2003 Annual Report On Our WAY Acuity Brands, Inc. 1170 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2400 Atlanta, Georgia 30309-7676 404-853-1400 www.acuitybrands.com A c u i t y B r a n d s , I n c . 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t ACUITY BRANDS WAY The Acuity Brands Way is our creed – it provides the fundamentals for creating and sustaining value for our customers, employees, and shareholders. It is the spirit of our business life together; it is what we create together. There are four building blocks to the Acuity Brands Way: • Our mission Our mission is to take good companies and make them great companies. • Our values Great companies show integrity by consistently behaving in ways that reflect their core values. We place confidence in our employees who demonstrate our four values: resolute, team- oriented, creative, and aspirational. • How we work together We work together constructively by demonstrating leadership, respect, and commitment. We are trans- parent with others and share our successes. We empower our employees to make decisions and contribute to our communities. • How we create value Great companies consistently create more value for their customers, employees, and shareholders than other companies. We are committed to creating value through setting high aspirations, measuring performance, achieving operating plans, committing to continuous improvement, and making changes faster than our competitors. The Acuity Brands Way guides how we do business and how we treat one another. Through the Acuity Brands Way, we’re on our way to high performance. Acuity Brands, Inc., with fiscal year 2003 net sales of approximately $2.0 billion, is comprised of Acuity Brands Lighting and Acuity Specialty Products. Acuity Brands Lighting is a world leader in lighting fixtures and includes brands such as Lithonia Lighting®, Holophane®, Peerless®, Hydrel®, and American Electric Lighting®. Acuity Specialty Products is a leading provider of specialty chemicals and includes brands such as Zep®, Enforcer®, and Selig Industries™. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Acuity Brands employs approximately 11,400 people and has operations throughout North America and in Europe and Asia. You’ll know us by our brands. SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS ACUITY BRANDS, INC. 1170 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2400 Atlanta, Georgia 30309-7676 404-853-1400 www.acuitybrands.com ACUITY BRANDS LIGHTING One Lithonia Way Conyers, Georgia 30012-3957 770-922-9000 www.acuitybrandslighting.com ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 4401 Northside Parkway Suite 700 Atlanta, Georgia 30327-3093 404-352-1680 www.acuitysp.com INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Ernst & Young LLP 600 Peachtree Street Suite 2800 Atlanta, Georgia 30308-2215 404-874-8300 ANNUAL MEETING 1:00 P.M. EST, Thursday, December 18, 2003 Renaissance Waverly Hotel Chambers Amphitheatre 2450 Galleria Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30339-3177 REPORTS AVAILABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS Copies of the following company reports may be obtained, without charge: 2003 Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission, filed on Form 10-K, and Quarterly Reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission, filed on Form 10-Q. Requests should be directed to: Acuity Brands, Inc. Attention: Investor Relations 1170 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2400 Atlanta, Georgia 30309-7676 404-853-1400 www.acuitybrands.com STOCK LISTING New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol: AYI TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR Questions about shareholder accounts, dividend checks and lost stock certifi- cates should be directed to: The Bank of New York Shareholder Relations Department – 12E P. O. Box 11258 Church Street Station New York, NY 10286-1258 800-432-0140 shareowners@bankofny.com www.stockbny.com Send certificates for transfer and address change to: The Bank of New York Receive and Deliver Department – 11W P.O. Box 11002 Church Street Station New York, NY 10286-1258 BuyDIRECTSM Acuity Brands’ transfer agent, The Bank of New York, offers the BuyDIRECT invest- ment plan, a direct purchase and sale plan for investors wishing to purchase Acuity Brands common stock. Dividends can be automatically reinvested. The plan is not sponsored or administered by Acuity Brands. For information regarding the plan, contact: The Bank of New York Church Street Station P.O. Box 11258 New York, NY 10286-1258 800-432-0140 ACCOUNT ACCESS Shareholders can access their account information at the Web site of Acuity Brands’ transfer agent, The Bank of New York, at www.stockbny.com or at www.acuitybrands.com. Shareholders can securely view their account information and check their holdings 24 hours a day. CASH DIVIDENDS Acuity Brands offers direct deposit of divi- dends to bank, savings, or money market accounts. For more information contact The Bank of New York at 800-432-0140. REMITTANCE OF OPTIONAL CASH INVESTMENTS AND PLAN TRANSACTION REQUESTS Mail the tear-off portion of transaction advice or account statements to: The Bank of New York Investment Services Department/ Acuity Brands P.O. Box 1958 Newark, New Jersey 07101-9774 SHAREHOLDERS OF RECORD The number of shareholders of record of Acuity Brands common stock was 5,322 as of October 23, 2003. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This annual report includes forward- looking statements regarding: (a) expected future results and (b) the impact of initiatives in each of the Com- pany’s businesses. A variety of factors could cause actual results to differ mate- rially from expected results including: (a) the uncertainty of general business conditions; (b) the level of success of the Company’s initiatives; and (c) the other risk factors more fully described in the accompanying financial informa- tion, which is separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2003. © 2003 Acuity Brands, Inc. All referenced trademarks are the property of their respective owners. a t n a l t A / e y e e e s e e s y b d e c u d o r p d n a d e n g s e d i Members of the Acuity Leadership Team (left to right): JAMES H. HEAGLE Executive Vice President Acuity Brands, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc. KENYON W. MURPHY Senior Vice President and General Counsel Acuity Brands, Inc. KENNETH W. HONEYCUTT, JR. Executive Vice President Acuity Brands, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. JAMES S. BALLOUN Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. JOSEPH G. PARHAM, JR. Senior Vice President, Human Resources Acuity Brands, Inc. JOHN K. MORGAN Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. VERNON J. NAGEL Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. On the cover (left to right): WENDY MCBAY Strategic Pricing Manager Lithonia Lighting CHRIS TUTTLE Assistant Controller Acuity Brands, Inc. MAI TRAN OEM Sourcing Manager Acuity Brands Lighting 1 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS We’re on our way to becoming a great company. This pathway may stretch out several years, definitely beyond next year or even the next. But you can see the evidence of the momentum gathering in our Company now. to becoming a GREAT COMPANY PERFORMANCE IN 2003 In 2003, it was difficult to see this transformation taking place. Earnings per share were $1.15, including the $0.16 per share impact of a patent dispute settlement and an environmental matter, compared to $1.26 in 2002. Net income was close to $48 million, down slightly from 2002. So why are we encouraged? We knew we had to manage well in a tough environment, so we really focused on cash flow by reducing inventory, negotiating more favorable terms with key customers, and holding down spending. In the lighting business, for example, our inventory has been reduced by seven days, and improvements have also been made in accounts receivable. All of these efforts allowed us to shrink debt by $97 million, far more than expected, and reduce our debt-to-capital ratio to 52% from 58%, closer to our tar- geted 40%. We’ve paid down $198 million of the $644 million of debt we had when we formed Acuity Brands two years ago. up 4% while non-residential construction continued to decline at an estimated rate of 6% and office vacancy rates rose to a ten-year high. At Acuity Specialty Products (ASP), we realized a 3% gain in net sales at a time when small-business customers were tightening their belts. Overall our net sales grew almost 4% and we gained almost a full point in gross margins. As the year ended, we felt a sense of achievement. We prevailed in growing this Company in a weak economy, we paid down debt, we paid dividends, and we invested in our future. 2004 AND BEYOND In 2004 and beyond, we’re determined to fulfill our mission of moving from being a good company to being a great company, with the goal of performing in the top quartile of companies. What’s the evidence that this will happen for Acuity Brands? We also put our shoulders behind sales growth, increasing net sales from $1.97 billion to $2.05 billion at a time when there were fewer construction cranes in America’s skylines. Acuity Brands Lighting (ABL) pushed net sales • First, we’ve demonstrated strong financial disci- pline. Our officers have visited operations across the Company to raise the awareness of cash manage- ment. To follow both the letter and the spirit of the 3 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t 2 2 Shareholder letter continued . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we’ve improved the accounting systems in our business units and launched processes to bring our officers and Board into discussions of financial issues as soon as they arise. demand, and new ways of distributing products and services. When I consider the stories of individual and team successes you’ll find in this report, they give me a real sense of excitement. We’re gathering momentum. • Second, we’ve pledged ourselves to a creed we call the Acuity Brands Way. It’s our commitment to the mis- sion, values, and high-performance behaviors that drive the way we do business. Employees from across Acuity Brands helped shape this promise through extensive debates and discussions. This is important; the Acuity Brands Way commits us to the behaviors of high performance. • Third, we’ve implemented a new leadership develop- ment process in 2003. For the first time we have a consistent, systematic way of identifying future leaders, immersing them in the values and behaviors that lead to excellence, developing their skills in high-performance practices, and recognizing their performance with real consequences. • And fourth, we’ve pursued performance improvement initiatives that will have a significant impact in 2004 and beyond: strategic sourcing, channel expansion, sales force renewal, margin management, consolidation of distribution, and manufacturing network transfor- mation. In the following pages, you’ll see stories from these efforts that provide evidence of the hard work and sheer heart that our people are putting into them. This combination of cultural levers and management discipline is creating the sense of a new era in our Company. We know the way to greatness lies not simply in discipline and analysis. In the end it will be passion and creativity that take us there – new ways of approach- ing costs and pricing, new products that fill niches of Our Board has been a champion of the changes taking place inside our Company and a stabilizing force amid the changes taking place outside. During the year, we were pleased to add Robert F. McCullough, Chief Financial Officer of AMVESCAP PLC, and Jay M. Davis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of National Distributing Company, Inc., to our Board of Directors. We have a Board of ten Directors who take their obli- gations to you seriously and demonstrate strong ethics in their decisions. We thank Leslie M. (Bud) Baker, Jr., retired Chairman of Wachovia Corporation, who will be retiring from the Board at the end of his term in December 2003, for his service during a time of major restructuring. Acuity Brands is completing the second year of its life. We talked about high performance before our lighting and specialty chemicals businesses became Acuity Brands. Now we have the benefit of focusing on only those busi- nesses, and we’re getting traction. We don’t expect to be an overnight wonder. But we do expect over time to become one of America’s next great companies. This is the future that this leadership team is building for you. James S. Balloun Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. 2 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A 3 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS For the year ended August 31 (in thousands of dollars, except earnings per share) Operations: Net sales Gross profit % Operating profit Operating profit % Net income Earnings per share Basic earnings per share Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding Diluted earnings per share Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding Pro forma earnings per share (1) Basic earnings per share Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding Net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation and amortization Capital expenditures Employees At August 31 (in thousands of dollars) Financial Position: Total assets Total debt Total stockholders’ equity Total debt to capitalization Operating working capital (2) Operating working capital as a percentage of net sales 2003 2002 % Change $ 2,049,308 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 41.6 % 110,276 5.4 % 47,782 1.15 41,459 1.15 41,721 n/a n/a 160,345 46,039 28,154 11,400 2003 1,288,219 445,808 408,294 52.2 % 325,419 15.9 % $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,972,796 40.7 % 120,127 6.1 % 52,024 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.26 41,286 146,841 49,494 33,482 11,800 3.9 % (8.2) % (8.2) % 9.2 % (7.0) % (15.9) % (3.4) % 2002 % Change 1,357,954 543,121 401,952 57.5 % 377,964 19.2 % (5.1) % (17.9) % 1.6 % (13.9) % (1) Please see Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. (2) Operating working capital is defined as net receivables plus inventories minus accounts payable. Operating Working Capital Debt Debt to Capitalization IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN PERCENTAGES 477.6 399.3 378.0 325.4 636.4 608.8 543.1 445.8 59.0 61.4 57.5 52.2 2000 2001 2002 2003 2000 2001 2002 2003 2000 2001 2002 2003 5 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t 4 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A ACUITY BRANDS LIGHTING Acuity Brands Lighting (ABL) generated 4.3% sales growth and increased operating profit in fiscal year 2003 amid a continuing decline in non-residential construction. This performance was possible because of Acuity Brands Lighting’s recent expansion in other lighting channels, including national accounts, utilities, retail chains, and facilities maintenance. ABL expanded its presence at The Home Depot® from 30% of stores to virtually all stores and benefited from its 2002 selection as primary lighting fixture supplier to W.W. Grainger, Inc., which serves the facilities maintenance market. “There are a lot of ways of get- ting to the customer,” comments President and CEO Ken Honeycutt, “and no one is more broadly engaged than we are.” Three key improvement initiatives also contributed to improved sales and margins. These include supply chain management, strategic margin management, and selling effectiveness. The supply chain initiative has already created enormous change between ABL and its suppliers, which will ultimately be two-thirds fewer in number. “It’s moved from being about sav- ing money on components to changing the way we do business with suppliers,” says Honeycutt. The margin effort, too, has delivered results. With price erosion a continuing problem in the commer- cial lighting industry, ABL created a new Strategic Margin Management unit. Among other things, this unit has improved compliance with terms and conditions and has helped business units make better- informed pricing decisions by providing them with more comprehensive information. While in the past ABL has experienced annual price erosion of up to 3% a year during a down cycle, the Company substantially mitigated this impact in 2003. An investment in selling effectiveness has also produced good results; at the Antique Street Lamps unit, for instance, sales were up by nearly 13% in 2003, at a higher level of profitability. In 2004, these three initiatives are expected to have an even stronger impact. The supply chain initiative will include not only sourcing improvements but also distribution and manufacturing network effi- ciencies. Margin management will become more integrated into every facet of the business. And the selling effectiveness effort will include agency sales as well as all direct sales organizations. ABL will invest more heavily in new products to support these sales efforts, with the goal of sustaining its leading edge in product creation. At the same time, the Company is working to acquire a “customer-in” perspective to complement its “product-out” mentality. For exam- ple, after discussions with South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, ABL developed an exclusive Internet application that makes it easier for utilities to sell custom lighting fixtures to their customers. With the Company now selling through a greater number of channels to a growing number of segments, ABL is less vulnerable to cyclicality in any one segment. “Throughout our history we’ve 4 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A BRANDS PRODUCTS MARKETS American Electric Lighting® Antique Street Lamps™ Carandini™ Gotham® Holophane® Hydrel® Lithonia Lighting® MetalOptics® Peerless® SpecLight™ Fluorescent lighting Industrial lighting Outdoor area lighting Landscape lighting Roadway lighting Emergency lighting Architectural lighting Flexible wiring and lighting controls Downlighting and track lighting Decorative fluorescent lighting COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL, including offices, stores, schools, and public buildings INDUSTRIAL, including warehouses and manufacturing facilities INFRASTRUCTURE, including high- ways, airports, and ports CONSUMER, including home improve- ment centers and lighting showrooms 5 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t 1 2 3 1 High-performance Lithonia Lighting® H.I.D. fixtures make maintenance easier at Dobbins Air Force Base. 2 Antique Street Lamps’ new Eurotique® line features the HanoverTM luminaire. 3 Holophane’s historically styled MemphisTM fixtures, typically used outdoors, grace an indoor setting. reinvented ourselves,” says Honeycutt. “This is a transformation into a new kind of business model.” At the heart of the ABL strategy is the decision to provide a tailored value proposition to each key customer segment: • The core Lithonia Lighting unit and the American Electric unit focus on providing the “Best Value.” • The Gotham, Holophane, Peerless, and Hydrel units aspire to “Product Leadership.” • Other units such as Antique Street Lamps and MetalOptics offer “Specialized Solutions,” includ- ing such services as lighting audits. This segment-focused strategy and the continuing improvement initiatives are so broadly felt that they are transforming the culture at ABL. “The people of our organization understand where we are going as a company and the part every unit and every person plays,” says Honeycutt. 7 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t 6 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A ACUITY BRANDS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS BRANDS Enforcer® Selig IndustriesTM Zep® Zep CommercialTM DISTRIBUTION LICENSE: Armor All® Professional* PRODUCTS Cleaners Sanitizers Disinfectants Polishes Floor finishes Degreasers Deodorizers Pesticides Insecticides Hand soaps MARKETS INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL, including food processing and preparation, transportation, education, automotive, hospitality, and municipality RETAIL, including large and small home improvement centers and mass merchandisers 1 2 3 1 New reps receive instruction on products and selling skills at ASP’s new Sales Training Center in Atlanta. 2 At food processing plants, Zep® General Purpose Foam Cleaner cleans, removes stains, and deodorizes in one operation. 3 Zep® Triple Foam adds U.V. and rust corrosion protection to vehicles. Our specialty chemicals business, Acuity Specialty Products (ASP), also conveys a sense of growing strength and momentum. ASP’s response to material costs that rose by several million dollars in 2003 indicates the Company’s ability to deal quickly and effectively with changes in the environment. A team of 53 people tackled the issue and totally offset those increases through substitutions, changes in packaging, and manu- facturing efficiencies. The Company also resolved to continue special investments under way in sales force capabilities, consolidation of distribution, and new product development. While the result was lower profitability for the fiscal year, President and CEO Jim Heagle anticipates a strong 2004. “We’ve identified the pathway,” says Heagle. “We’re going to focus on four initiatives and do them well.” The first is consolidation and full integration of all supply chain functions of the organization into a single unit to achieve greater leverage and efficiencies. The other three are intended to increase sales by providing greater value to ASP’s customers. ASP will increase its focus on the retail channel, with a spec- ial unit dedicated to The Home Depot. And two programs are targeted at strengthening sales in the industrial and institutional channel: “Genesis,” a recruiting, training, and mentoring program for new sales reps, and “Cornerstone,” a program to train, motivate, and serve tenured reps. Top perfor- mers, the “Cornerstone Elite Reps,” have a special access line to Company specialists who respond quickly to their requests. All reps will receive more training and support. These four initiatives are generating a sense of greater focus and growth potential throughout the organization. *Armor All® is a registered trademark of Armor All Products Corporation. 6 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A BUILDING A GREAT COMPANY MEANS 7 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t . . . getting the right people in place; gathering the facts about our cus- tomers, our markets, and our own capabilities; setting a clear path; developing a culture of creativity and decisiveness; and unleashing the passion of our people. Every day we feel a sense of move- ment. It comes not from one flash of extraordinary effort but from multiple breakthrough initiatives that light up our Company’s landscape and show us the way to growth and improved profitability. These are the stories of our people, where greatness begins. 9 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t 8 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A Creating opportunities to GROW SALES AND MARGINS We’re bringing more energy and discipline to the things that drive profitable growth – sales and margins. ASP: PAVING THE WAY FOR NEW ZEP REPS Michele Choate is a harbinger of things to come at Acuity Specialty Products (ASP). Hired as a Zep Rep, Choate is bilingual and moves easily between Spanish-speaking and English-speaking managers at area hospitals and local car washes. There will be more “Michele Choates” in ASP’s future. Early in 2003, Jim Heagle, President and CEO of ASP, tapped Shane Beavers to solve the problem of new sales rep attrition. Beavers’ six teams surveyed 600 Zep Reps and interviewed 24 sales managers. They ran correlations of performance to a number of factors, including education and experience, and developed demographic profiles of typical customers. They found that because ASP’s customer base had evolved to a more diverse group, the sales group needed to become more diverse as well. Beavers’ six teams implemented a practical, but very different, way for ASP to hire and train reps. As a result: • The profile of the reps ASP seeks is now more reflective of customers. • Candidates take a test that predicts sales ambition and potential. • Managers now have week-by-week plans for training activities. • New reps have more tools to support their sales efforts. • Managers evaluate new reps at key intervals, using productivity measurements appropriate to their tenure. New recruits are now being trained under the new approach. Choate will soon be joined by others with the skill set and talent to renew the link with ASP’s customer base. ABL: TAKING A NOVEL APPROACH TO MARGIN IMPROVEMENT When Lithonia Lighting created a Strategic Margin Management unit in 2003, it was a unique response to a chronic problem. Price erosion has characterized the commercial lighting industry for most of the last decade, with prices retreating almost 2% a year for the last five years. Under the leadership of Rick Earlywine, the unit began to go after five opportunities: • Greater rigor in enforcing terms and conditions • Annual reviews to ensure that pricing reflects full costs and value • Better controls on product promotions • An improved negotiation process for project business • A customer profitability effort to develop mutual goals of improving business processes and reduc- ing transaction costs. By the end of fiscal year 2003, Earlywine and his team were able to report they had achieved their first-year goal of arresting price declines. 8 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A 9 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t MICHELE CHOATE New Rep Manager Zep SHANE BEAVERS Executive Director of New Rep Development ASP RICK EARLYWINE Vice President, Strategic Margin Management ABL/Lithonia Lighting 11 Taking bold steps to SHAKE UP SOURCING When we launched our sourcing initiatives two years ago, we believed we could employ better tools and processes to reduce costs. Today it’s clear we can transform the way we do business with suppliers. ABL: TRANSFORMING OUR APPROACH TO SOURCING “We decided to go after sourcing aggressively,” says Ken Honeycutt, President and CEO of Acuity Brands Lighting (ABL). “Materials and procurement are a huge part of our costs.” He chose Tom Naramore to lead the effort as Senior Vice President of Global Sourcing. Formerly head of the fluorescent product group of Lithonia Lighting, Naramore had built a reputation for strong relationships with suppliers. Naramore and his team set out to shake up the raw materials marketplace through electronically enabled bidding, negoti- ating, and other processes. They also began shrinking the number of suppliers: identifying the best in the world and working with them to reduce transaction costs, minimize inventory, and eliminate other cash-consuming practices. Ultimately, ABL expects to have one-third its current num- ber of suppliers. Naramore also strengthened his sourcing staff, recruiting skilled resources from the outside as well as ramping up skills internally. Finally, his team established an Asian sourcing office in Shanghai to tap the best sources in the region. Honeycutt has been delighted by what Naramore and his team have accomplished. “They’ve saved tens of millions annually, with more to come,” says Honeycutt. Even more important to ABL’s future, they’ve broken through traditional methods to create an entirely new approach to sourcing. “We had good, capable people 10 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A TOM NARAMORE Senior Vice President of Global Sourcing ABL GARY WALLPE Vice President of Sourcing ABL 11 11 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t in sourcing when they started,” Honeycutt says. “Today we have outstanding people, new tools and ideas, and a totally different way of working with suppliers. The change goes far beyond material costs. We’re opening up a new frontier that promises real improvements in cost, quality, and service.” ASP: COUNTERING INCREASES IN RAW MATERIAL COSTS The spring of 2003 pounded Acuity Specialty Products (ASP) with wave after wave of increases in the cost of raw materials. Bad weather quadrupled the price of d-Limonene, a citrus extract that serves as a natural solvent in many of ASP’s cleaners; the price of petroleum-based products spiked; and natural gas prices tripled. Additional costs were projected at several million dollars at a time when ASP could not pass along the increases to the customer. Ed Walczak, Vice President, Operations, recruited 53 team members to look for opportunities in raw material substitu- tion, packaging engineering, and manufacturing efficiency. One team, led by Bruce Steadman, developed an alterna- tive formulation using soybean extract in certain products, saving ASP $250,000. A team at the Seaboard Aerosol Plant, led by Gary Ayres, corrected an overfill problem on cans coming off the line, saving another $300,000. All together, Walczak’s teams largely offset the rise in raw material costs through their relentless efforts. ED WALCZAK Vice President, Operations ASP 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t 12 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A Finding new ways to REACH CUSTOMERS As the pathways to customers have multiplied, we have partnered with leading retail chains, buying co-ops, and other organizations to reach customers wherever they are. ASP: ENTERING THE CO-OP CHANNEL When U.S. Communities Purchasing and Finance Agency, a purchasing cooperative used nationally by cities, counties, states, schools, and other non-federal government agencies, sent out a request for proposals for janitorial supplies in 2002, Ross Harding, Executive Vice President, Zep U.S., responded that Zep was not the low-price supplier, but it could provide the low-cost solution. U.S. Communities challenged him to prove it. A combination of specialists took on the challenge. First, R&D technicians did a Total Cost of Ownership survey of products certain U.S. Communities agencies were buy- ing and found, among other things, that a “dilutable” floor stripper they were using had to be used at full strength to get the job done. They recommended a new slate of prod- ucts, and Acuity Specialty Products’ financial department developed a model demonstrating a 15% annual savings for one of the co-op’s counties. Zep won the account. A logistics team quickly planned the ramp-up in production and Brian Shelby took responsibility for the rollout. In the first 90 days, Zep was rated a “Best Supplier” by U.S. Communities. ABL: ROLLING OUT ABL LIGHTING TO ALL THE HOME DEPOT STORES In the summer of 2002, Acuity Brands Lighting (ABL) earned the opportunity to expand from one-third of The Home Depot stores to virtually all 1,500 during the next MARCO BARCENAS Director, Operations ABL – Monterrey Facility BRIAN SHELBY Vice President, National Accounts ASP RANDY ROTH Director, Logistics Planning ABL 12 13 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t 12 months. We believe The Home Depot chose ABL based on its strong brand recognition and its breadth of products and service capabilities to serve its expanding customer base. ABL had been selected as The Home Depot’s Supplier of the Year for 2002, having consistently delivered order fill rates in excess of 98%. Rick Dunlap, Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Consumer Products, got the Acuity Brands Lighting teams busy, tripling manufacturing and distribution volume for the account and rolling out product displays to an addi- tional 1,000 stores. When fill rates dropped from a high of 99% in December 2002 to unacceptable levels in April 2003, Dunlap knew they had to get performance up quickly. The team entered the chain’s forecasting data directly into ABL’s planning model and collaborated with purchasing, manufacturing, and scheduling on how to meet the requirements. Their actions paid off. In May 2003, Acuity Brands Lighting was back above a 98% fill rate and in June, it had again reached its historical high of 99%. The Home Depot cited ABL as a model for other vendors to follow in rapid ramp- ups of volume. RICK DUNLAP Vice President, Sales & Marketing ABL/Consumer Products Group 14 . c n I , s d n a r B y t i u c A Developing innovative products that STAND OUT IN A CROWD We’re building a deep bench of leaders creative enough to push the boundaries of what is possible and decisive enough to make it happen. ABL: BRINGING OPTICAL INNOVATION TO BILLBOARDS The billboards that dot America’s freeways were running up huge energy costs when several large industry players came to Holophane two years ago. Their question: Can you make a lighting system that uses less energy? With more than half the market share for this seg- ment, Holophane was an experienced supplier to the $5 billion media market through its SignVue® lighting products. The challenge was to reduce the number of lights it takes to make a 14-foot x 48-foot “bulletin” fully visible to drivers – traditionally four lights per bulletin. Diarmuid McSweeney, Vice President of Business Development for Holophane, named Dennis Blansit to lead the product development team, with Optical Engineer Bryan Harvey respon- sible for the optical breakthrough. Using newer anodized reflector material to reflect light from the lamps and glass prisms on top to refract it and throw it exactly where they wanted, the team came up with a home run: two super- efficient luminaires that cut energy costs by half. When they invited Clear Channel and Lamar to their facility to unveil the new product – called AdVueTM – the clients were elated. The team had exceeded expectations by giving them a product with a payback of less than two years. Introduction of the new AdVue lights started in October 2003. ASP: SIMPLIFYING CLEANING SOLUTIONS More than a year ago, Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport started looking for a way to simplify the cleaning of restrooms along its six concourses and its terminal. “Since they’re the world’s busiest airport, they have an enormous amount of traffic,” explains Richard Buchman, a Zep Rep who partners with Billy Light in serving the account. Buchman contacted Bruce Steadman, Director of Product Development for Acuity Specialty Products (ASP), and gave him the customer’s specs. “They wanted a single product that could be used at dif- ferent dilution rates to clean mirrors, floors, and toilets,” recalls Steadman, “and it needed to be a good deodorizer.” Steadman’s team experimented with formulations that would work for all those purposes. “Typically, if you put floor cleaner on glass it will streak and cause all kinds of problems,” he explains. ASP chem- ist Bob Beach developed an all-in-one cleaner called Zep AIO, and technicians designed a system that included an easy-to-use dispenser, a secondary point- of-use container, and color-coded labels for light and heavy duty cleaning. By mid-2003 the new product was installed near bathrooms all over Hartsfield, dispensing at the appropriate dilution rate with the push of a button. “Now we have a product that’s nice smelling, biodegradable, and very effective in cleaning and deodorizing any hard surface,” says Steadman. “The innovation,” he adds, “grew out of respond- ing to the specific needs of a customer.” 15 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t DENNIS BLANSIT Project Manager ABL/Holophane Outdoor Group BILLY LIGHT Zep Sales Representative ASP THESE STORIES PROVIDE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF CONTRIBUTIONS OUR PEOPLE ARE MAKING TO BUILD A GREAT COMPANY. IT WILL TAKE MANY MORE OF THESE SUCCESS STORIES TO REACH OUR GOAL, BUT WE ARE ON OUR WAY. 16 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACUITY LEADERSHIP TEAM JAMES S. BALLOUN 1 Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. JAMES S. BALLOUN Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. JOHN K. MORGAN Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. JAMES H. HEAGLE Executive Vice President Acuity Brands, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc. KENNETH W. HONEYCUTT, JR. Executive Vice President Acuity Brands, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. VERNON J. NAGEL Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. KENYON W. MURPHY Senior Vice President and General Counsel Acuity Brands, Inc. JOSEPH G. PARHAM, JR. Senior Vice President, Human Resources Acuity Brands, Inc. LESLIE M. BAKER, JR. Former Chairman Wachovia Corporation PETER C. BROWNING Dean, McColl Graduate School of Business at Queens University of Charlotte; Non-Executive Chairman Nucor Corporation JOHN L. CLENDENIN 2 Chairman Emeritus, BellSouth Corporation JAY M. DAVIS Chairman and Chief Executive Officer National Distributing Company, Inc. EARNEST W. DEAVENPORT, JR. Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Eastman Chemical Company ROBERT F. MCCULLOUGH Chief Financial Officer, AMVESCAP PLC JULIA B. NORTH Former President of Consumer Services BellSouth Corporation; Former President and Chief Executive Officer VSI Enterprises, Inc. RAY M. ROBINSON 3 President, East Lake Golf Club; Former Southern Region President AT&T Corporation NEIL WILLIAMS 4 Former General Counsel AMVESCAP PLC 1 Chairman of Executive Committee 2 Chairman of Audit Committee 3 Chairman of Compensation Committee 4 Chairman of Governance Committee UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003. OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to . Commission file number 001-16583. ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2400, Atlanta, Georgia (Address of principal executive offices) 58-2632672 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 30309 (Zip Code) (404) 853-1400 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on which Registered Common Stock ($0.01 Par Value) Preferred Stock Purchase Rights New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ‘ Based on the closing price of $13.30 as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange on February 28, 2003, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant, was $548,567,225. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, was 41,772,985 shares as of October 23, 2003. Location in Form 10-K DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Incorporated Document Part II, Item 5 Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 Proxy Statement for 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Proxy Statement for 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders ACUITY BRANDS, INC. Table of Contents Page No. Part I Part II Part III Part IV Item 1. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-10 11 11-12 12 Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . Item 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Item 9. Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9a. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 14 14-31 31 32-65 66 66 67 67 67 67 67 Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68-77 Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 79 2 PART I Item 1. Business Acuity Brands, Inc. (“Acuity Brands” or the “Company”) operates in two business segments – lighting equipment and specialty products. The lighting equipment segment of the Company (“Acuity Brands Lighting” or “ABL”) manufactures and distributes a broad array of indoor and outdoor lighting fixtures for markets throughout North America and select international markets. The specialty products segment of Acuity Brands (“Acuity Specialty Products Group” or “ASP”) produces and distributes cleaning, maintenance, and sanitation chemicals and other products for customers primarily throughout the United States, Canada, and Western Europe. Of the Company’s fiscal 2003 net sales of approximately $2.0 billion, the lighting equipment segment generated approximately 75 percent of total net sales while the specialty products segment provided the remaining 25 percent. Information relating to the net sales, operating profits or losses, and total assets of the Company’s two segments for the past three fiscal years is reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. Prior to November 30, 2001, Acuity Brands was a wholly-owned subsidiary of National Service Industries, Inc. (“NSI”) owning and operating the lighting equipment and specialty products businesses. Acuity Brands was spun off from NSI into a separate publicly traded company with its own management and board of directors through a tax-free distribution (“Distribution” or “Spin-off”) of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of Acuity Brands on November 30, 2001. Each NSI stockholder of record as of November 16, 2001, the record date for the Distribution, received one share of Acuity Brands common stock for each share of NSI common stock held at that date. Business Segments Lighting Equipment The lighting equipment business of Acuity Brands is operated under Acuity Brands Lighting. Management of Acuity Brands believes that Acuity Brands Lighting is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of lighting fixtures for both new construction and renovation. Products include a full range of indoor and outdoor lighting for commercial and institutional, industrial, and residential applications. Lighting products are manufactured in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and Europe and are marketed under numerous brand names, including Lithonia®, Holophane®, Home-Vue®, Light Concepts®, Gotham®, Hydrel®, Peerless®, Antique Street Lamps™, American Electric®, SpecLight™, and Reloc®. ABL manufactures products in 21 plants in North America and in three plants in Europe. Principal customers include electrical distributors, retail home improvement centers, national accounts, lighting showrooms, and electric utilities located in North America and select international markets. In North America, ABL’s products are sold through independent sales agents and factory sales representatives who cover specific geographic areas and market segments. Products are delivered through a network of distribution centers, regional warehouses, and commercial warehouses using both common carriers and a company-owned truck fleet. To serve international customers, ABL employs a sales force that adopts distribution methods to meet individual customer or country requirements. In fiscal 2003, North American sales accounted for approximately 97 percent of ABL’s net sales. Specialty Products The specialty products business of Acuity Brands is operated under Acuity Specialty Products Group. ASP is a leading provider of specialty chemical products in the institutional and industrial (“I&I”) and retail markets. Products include cleaners, sanitizers, disinfectants, polishes, floor finishes, degreasers, deodorizers, pesticides, insecticides, and herbicides. ASP manufactures products in four North American plants and two European plants. Acuity Specialty Products Group sells products to customers primarily in North America and Western Europe. In fiscal 2003, North American sales accounted for approximately 94 percent of the net sales of ASP. 3 ASP serves a range of institutional and industrial customers, from small sole proprietorships to Fortune 1000 corporations and municipalities. Individual markets in the I&I channel include food processing and preparation, transportation, education, automotive, government, and hospitality and are serviced through a direct commissioned sales force. ASP also sells numerous products under such well-known brands as Enforcer®, Selig™, and Zep® through retail channels such as large and small home improvement centers, mass merchandisers, and hardware stores. Industry Overview Lighting Equipment The current size of the North American lighting fixture market is estimated at approximately $8.7 billion. The U.S. market, which represents approximately 94 percent of the North American market, is relatively fragmented. The Company estimates that the top four manufacturers (including Acuity Brands Lighting) represent approximately 50 percent of the total North American lighting market. The primary demand driver is non-residential construction, both new and renovation. Major industry trends include the on-going development of new and more efficient lamp sources and optical designs, increased adoption of new lighting ordinances, and continued emphasis on energy efficiency. There has been a significant increase in the size and relative presence of the retail home improvement center segment. In addition, imports of foreign sourced lighting fixtures continue to grow, driven by both the foreign production of U.S. manufacturers and imports of low-cost fixtures from Asian manufacturers. European-based electrical distributors have increased their presence in the U.S. with the acquisition of U.S.-based local and regional distributor chains, and smaller U.S. distributors continue to seek leverage through alignment with buying groups. Specialty Products The approximately $8.0 billion U.S. I&I market is highly fragmented. The Company estimates that five major players (including Acuity Specialty Products Group) represent approximately 50 percent of the total U.S. I&I market with the remainder divided among hundreds of regional players. In general, the Company estimates that the U.S. I&I market grows at a rate approximating Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”). To some extent, consumption of janitorial cleaning and sanitation products is discretionary, but in a health-driven, sophisticated market such as the U.S., the Company believes that health and safety regulations and customer expectations somewhat buffer demand downturns. Increasing legislation in the areas of food and occupational health that require increased ranges of application and frequency of use is fueling demand increases. In addition to the U.S. I&I market, there is a U.S. retail chemical market of approximately $4.3 billion, including a $2.8 billion market for cleaners and a $1.5 billion market for pest control. The Company believes that two major trends are reshaping the industry. First, health and safety regulations are shrinking the pool of available chemicals while at the same time increasing the total use rates. This has pushed development of improved physical product formulations and application methods. Second, increased centralized corporate buying and consolidation of the supply chain are threatening reselling distributors and requiring increased base manufacturing and logistics skills. Products Lighting Equipment Acuity Brands Lighting produces a wide variety of lighting fixtures used in the following applications: • Commercial & Institutional — Applications are represented by stores, hotels, offices, schools, and hospitals, as well as other government and public buildings. Products that serve these applications 4 include recessed, surface and suspended fluorescent lighting products, recessed downlighting, and track lighting, as well as “high-abuse” lighting products. The outdoor areas associated with these application segments are addressed by the lighting equipment business’ outdoor lighting products, such as area and floodlighting, decorative site lighting, and landscape lighting. • • Industrial — Applications primarily include warehouses and manufacturing facilities. The lighting equipment business serves these applications with a variety of glass and acrylic high intensity discharge (“HID”) and fluorescent lighting products. Infrastructure — Applications include highways, tunnels, airports, railway yards, and ports. Products that serve these applications include high-mast, off-set roadway, and sign lighting. • Consumer — Applications are addressed with a combination of decorative fluorescent and downlighting products, as well as utilitarian fluorescent products. • Other Applications & Products — Other products include emergency lighting fixtures, which are used in non-residential buildings, and lighting control and flexible wiring systems. Fluorescent lighting products accounted for approximately 25 percent of total consolidated net sales during fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001. No other product category accounted for more than 10 percent of total consolidated net sales for these periods. Specialty Products ASP produces and supplies a wide variety of specialty chemical products that are used in numerous applications in a broad range of markets. These include: • Food Process and Food Preparation – ASP provides a total solution approach to serving the sanitation needs of its customers. New products, integrated increased technical dispensing systems, and innovative approaches to antimicrobial control have been implemented to complement the existing cleaners and sanitizers. training for the sales reps, • Transportation – Applications include cleaning and maintenance products for numerous types of transportation equipment including individual or fleets of aircraft, public transport, trucks, and cars. New products have delivered increased efficiency, regulatory compliance, and integrated application equipment. Major products are used to provide exterior cleaning and enhanced appearance. • Education – Applications include schools and universities. The product range is broad and covers all cleaning and maintenance areas with specific emphasis on floor care and general cleaning and deodorizing. • Automotive – Applications include original equipment manufacturers, dealerships, and repair/service facilities. A comprehensive range of products includes aerosols, powders, solvents, absorbents, emulsions, acids, and aqueous alkaline cleaners and degreasers to satisfy necessary cleaning requirements. • Hospitality – Applications include hotels and motels. Products and dispensing systems are designed to supply maintenance, housekeeping, and laundry applications with a complete cleaning solution. • Contractors and Homeowners – Applications include contract cleaners, small business owners, and homeowners and are supplied through retail channels. Products provide a comprehensive range of floor care, general-purpose cleaners and sanitizers, drain maintenance, and pest control in convenient ready- to-use packaging. • Municipalities – Applications include city governments, airports, transit authorities, and police and fire departments. The broad product range covers all cleaning and maintenance areas. Emphasis is on the total cost of cleaning solutions. 5 Sales and Marketing Lighting Equipment Sales. ABL provides North American market coverage with separate sales forces targeted at delivering appropriate products and services to specific customer, channel, and geographic segments. In total, these sales forces are comprised of approximately 1,700 salespeople (200 factory-employed and 1,500 independent sales representatives in over 200 separate sales agencies). ABL also operates two separate European sales forces and an international sales group coordinating sales to the balance of the globe. Marketing. ABL markets its products through a broad spectrum of marketing and promotional vehicles, including direct customer contact, on-site training at training facilities, print advertising in industry publications, product brochures, and other literature, as well as electronic media. Direct customer contact is performed by specification sales managers, whose primary role is the promotion of select products to the many buying influences involved in the specification/bid process common in the industry. Most on-site training is conducted at a dedicated product training facility at ABL’s headquarters in Conyers, Georgia. Specialty Products Sales. The sales organization at ASP consists of 1,850 sales representatives worldwide. The compensation model in the I&I channel is primarily 100 percent commission. Net sales are primarily dependent on the hiring, training, and retention of the commissioned sales representatives. The ASP sales organization covers a wide geographic territory. The I&I market is serviced primarily through four U.S. divisions, as well as Canadian and European divisions. Each of the four U.S. divisions includes from 230 to 370 sales representatives supplemented by a complement of customer and technical service personnel. The Canadian and European operations have approximately 150 and 250 sales representatives, respectively. The retail sales division utilizes approximately 160 salaried sales and management personnel to focus on the do-it-yourself home center channel. Marketing. ASP’s marketing efforts are focused on supporting a sell-through program from ASP through the sales organization and to the customer. ASP’s primary focus is in four distinct areas. Market planning includes comprehensive strategic and tactical plan development and support emphasizing financial objectives and accountability. Product management includes new product development and chemical dispensing equipment management. Market-based pricing takes into account competitive analysis and leverages the flexibility of the ASP operating platform. Marketing services provides sales support tools and collateral sales information to ASP’s worldwide sales force and customer base. Customers A single customer in the home improvement channel, The Home Depot, accounted for 10 percent, 7 percent and 3 percent of the net sales of Acuity Brands in fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The loss of that customer would adversely affect the Company’s results of operations. Lighting Equipment Customers of Acuity Brands Lighting include electrical distributors, retail home improvement centers, national accounts, lighting showrooms, and electric utilities. In addition, there are a variety of other buying influences, which for any given project could represent a significant influence in the product specification process. These generally include engineers, architects, and lighting designers. For the year ended August 31, 2003, sales to electrical distributors represented approximately 63 percent of ABL’s net sales. For the same period, net sales to retail home improvement centers and national accounts each represented approximately 12 percent of the net sales of ABL. 6 Specialty Products Customers of ASP consist of I&I customers (approximately 80 percent of ASP net sales) and retail customers (approximately 20 percent of ASP net sales). I&I customers range from sole proprietorships to Fortune 1000 corporations and governmental agencies and are in various markets, including food processing and preparation, transportation, education, automotive, and hospitality. Retail customers primarily include large and small home improvement centers, mass merchandisers, and hardware stores. Manufacturing Acuity Brands operates 30 manufacturing facilities, including 16 facilities in the United States, three facilities in Canada, six facilities in Mexico, and five facilities in Europe. Lighting Equipment ABL utilizes a blend of internal and outsourced manufacturing processes and capabilities to fulfill a variety of customer needs in the most cost effective manner. Critical processes, such as reflector forming and anodizing and high-end glass production, are primarily performed at company-owned facilities, offering the ability to differentiate end products through superior capabilities. Investment is focused on improving product quality and manufacturing efficiency. The integration of local suppliers’ factories and warehouses also provides an opportunity to lower ABL-owned component inventory while maintaining high service levels via frequent just- in-time deliveries. ABL also utilizes contract manufacturing for certain products and purchases certain finished goods, primarily poles to complement its area lighting fixtures, and also a variety of residential and commercial lighting equipment, from Asian and European sources. U.S. operations represent approximately 52 percent of production; Mexico accounts for approximately 35 percent of production; Canada accounts for approximately three percent of production; and Europe accounts for approximately two percent of production. The remaining eight percent of production is outsourced using contract manufacturing and finished good suppliers. During fiscal 2004, management will continue to focus on initiatives to make the Company more globally competitive. One of these initiatives at ABL, related to enhancing its global supply chain, includes the consolidation of up to seven manufacturing facilities into its most efficient locations. Management believes this initiative will result in increased production in international locations, primarily Mexico, and greater sourcing from its network of worldwide vendors. Although this initiative is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations during fiscal 2004, management expects to realize benefits beginning in fiscal 2005. Specialty Products ASP manufactures products at six facilities located in the United States, Canada, Holland and Italy. The three U.S. facilities produce approximately 94 percent of total manufactured product; Canada accounts for approximately three percent of manufactured product; and Europe accounts for approximately three percent of manufactured product. Certain finished goods purchased from contract manufacturers and finished goods suppliers supplement line. Sales of outsourced product currently account for approximately 30 percent of the net sales volume of ASP. Management does not believe the loss of any one supplier of outsourced product would have a material adverse impact on the results of operations of ASP. the manufactured product Distribution Lighting Equipment Products are delivered through a network of strategically located distribution centers, regional warehouses, and commercial warehouses in North America using both common carriers and a company-owned truck fleet. For international customers, distribution methods are adapted to meet individual customer or country requirements. 7 Specialty Products Products sold to I&I markets are shipped from strategically located distribution centers throughout North America, while the retail products are distributed nationwide from the Georgia plants and warehouses. Products are primarily delivered through common carriers. Research and Development Lighting Equipment Research and development efforts at ABL are targeted toward the development of products with an ever- increasing performance-to-cost ratio, and close relationships with lamp and ballast manufacturers are maintained to understand and incorporate technology enhancements in ABL’s fixture designs. ABL operates six separate product development model shops and seven photometers for testing and optimizing fixture photometric performance. The Conyers, Georgia lab is approved by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for both fluorescent and high intensity discharge fixtures. For the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, research and development expense at ABL was $26.1 million, $20.3 million, and $14.5 million, respectively. Specialty Products At ASP, the research and development focus is directed towards product systems aimed at comprehensive solutions for a broad customer base. Efforts to enhance existing formulations by utilizing new raw materials or combinations of raw materials have resulted in both new and improved products. Technical expertise was employed to move proven technologies into new applications. Research and development expense at ASP for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, excluding technical services, was $1.3 million, $1.7 million, and $1.1 million, respectively. Competition Lighting Equipment The lighting equipment industry served by ABL is highly competitive, with the largest suppliers serving many of the same markets and competing for the same customers. Competition is based on numerous factors, including brand name recognition, price, product quality and design, customer relationships, and service capabilities. Main competitors in the lighting industry include Cooper Industries, Genlyte Thomas Group, and Hubbell. The management of Acuity Brands believes that the four largest lighting manufacturers (including ABL) possess approximately a 50 percent share of the total North American lighting market. Specialty Products The specialty products industry served by ASP is highly competitive. Overall, competition is fragmented, with numerous local and regional operators selling directly to customers as well as distributors and a few national competitors. Many of these competitors offer products in some, but not all, of the markets served by ASP. Competition is based primarily on brand name recognition, price, product quality, and customer service. Competitors industry include NCH, Rochester Midland, State Chemical, JohnsonDiversey, and Ecolab. Management estimates that the major players (including ASP) have approximately 50 percent of the total U.S. I&I market and the remainder is divided among hundreds of regional players. in the specialty products Environmental Regulation The operations of the Company are subject to comprehensive laws and regulations relating to the generation, storage, handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous substances and solid and hazardous 8 wastes and to the remediation of contaminated sites. Permits and environmental controls are required for certain of the Company’s operations to limit air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal, and revocation by issuing authorities. Acuity Brands believes that it is in substantial compliance with all material environmental laws, regulations, and permits. On an ongoing basis, Acuity Brands incurs capital and operating costs relating to environmental compliance. Environmental laws and regulations have generally become stricter in recent years, and the cost of responding to future changes may be substantial. See Item 3: Legal Proceedings below for a discussion of certain environmental matters. Raw Materials The products produced by Acuity Brands require certain raw materials, including aluminum, plastics, electrical components, solvents, surfactants, and certain grades of steel. Acuity Brands purchases most of these raw materials on the open market and relies on third parties for the sourcing of some finished goods. As such, the cost of products sold may be affected by changes in the market price of the above-mentioned raw materials or the sourcing of finished goods. Acuity Brands does not expect to engage in significant commodity hedging transactions for raw materials. Significant increases in the prices of Acuity Brands’ products due to increases in the cost of raw materials or sourcing could have a negative effect on demand for products and on profitability as well as a material adverse effect on the results of operations of Acuity Brands. ASP has a sole supplier of a critical packaging raw material. While this material only accounts for approximately three percent of the total raw material costs, it is used in products that account for approximately 10 percent of sales. Each business constantly monitors and investigates alternative suppliers and materials based on numerous attributes including quality, service, and price. Additionally, each business has conducted internet auctions as a method of competitive bidding. The Company’s ongoing efforts to improve the cost effectiveness of its products and services may result in a reduction in the number of its suppliers. A reduction in the number of suppliers could cause increased risk associated with reliance on a limited number of suppliers for certain raw materials, component parts, and finished goods. Backlog Orders The Company produces and stocks large quantities of inventory at key distribution centers and warehouses throughout North America. As a consequence, it satisfies a significant portion of customer demand within 24 to 48 hours from the time a customer order is placed. This is the situation at ASP and is becoming more the case at ABL, due to improved manufacturing ability, where the backlog currently represents approximately one month of net sales. Sales order backlogs of the lighting equipment business believed to be firm as of August 31, 2003 and 2002 were $136.1 million and $144.7 million, respectively. Sales order backlogs for the specialty products business were not material. Patents, Licenses and Trademarks Acuity Brands owns or has licenses to use various domestic and foreign patents, patent applications, and trademarks related to its products, processes, and businesses. These intellectual property rights, particularly the trademarks relating to the products of Acuity Brands, are important factors for the businesses of Acuity Brands. To protect these proprietary rights, Acuity Brands relies on copyright, patent, trade secret, and trademark laws. Despite these protections, unauthorized parties may attempt to infringe on the intellectual property of Acuity Brands. Management of Acuity Brands is not aware of any such material unauthorized use or of any pending claims that Acuity Brands does not have the right to use any intellectual property material to the businesses of Acuity Brands. While patents and patent applications in the aggregate are important to the competitive position of Acuity Brands, no single patent or patent application is material to the Company. 9 Seasonality and Cyclicality The businesses of Acuity Brands are somewhat seasonal, with net sales being affected by the impact of weather and seasonal demand on construction and installation programs, as well as the annual budget cycles of major customers. Because of these seasonal factors, Acuity Brands has experienced, and generally expects to experience, its highest sales in the last two quarters of its fiscal year ended August 31. A significant portion of the net sales of ABL relates to customers in the new construction and renovation industries primarily for commercial and industrial applications. These industries are cyclical in nature and subject to changes in general economic conditions. Volume has a major impact on the profitability of ABL and Acuity Brands as a whole. In addition, net sales at ASP are dependent on the retail, wholesale, and industrial markets, demand for which is generally associated with GDP in the United States. Economic downturns and the potential decline in key construction markets and demand for specialty chemicals may have a material adverse effect on the net sales and operating income of Acuity Brands. International Operations Acuity Brands manufactures and assembles products at numerous facilities, some of which are located outside the United States. Approximately 40 percent and six percent of the products of the lighting equipment and specialty products segments, respectively, are manufactured outside the United States, primarily in Mexico. Acuity Brands also obtains components and certain finished goods from suppliers located outside the United States. Approximately 35 percent of Acuity Brands’ lighting equipment products are produced in Mexico. These operations are authorized to operate as Maquiladoras by the Ministry of Economy of Mexico. Maquiladora status allows Acuity Brands to import certain items from the United States into Mexico duty-free, provided that such items, after processing, are re-exported from Mexico within 18 months. Maquiladora status, which is renewed every year, is subject to various restrictions and requirements, including compliance with the terms of the Maquiladora program and other local regulations. Many companies have established Maquiladora operations, increasing demand for labor, particularly skilled labor and professionals. This increase in demand, from new and existing Maquiladora operations, has in the past and could in the future result in increased labor costs. Acuity Brands may be required to make additional investments in automating equipment to partially offset potential increased labor costs. The Company’s initiatives to become more globally competitive include streamlining ABL’s global supply chain by reducing the number of manufacturing facilities and enhancing the Company’s worldwide procurement and sourcing capabilities. Management believes these initiatives will result in increased production in international locations, primarily Mexico, and will result in increased worldwide procurement and sourcing of certain raw materials, component parts, and finished goods. As a consequence, economic, political, military, or other events in a country where the Company manufactures, procures, or sources a significant amount of raw materials, component parts, or finished goods, could interfere with the Company’s operations and negatively impact the Company’s business. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003, net sales outside the U.S. represented approximately 12 percent and 15 percent of the total net sales of the lighting equipment and specialty products businesses, respectively. Employees Acuity Brands employs approximately 11,400 employees, of whom approximately 7,800 are employed in the United States, 2,400 in Mexico, 600 in Canada, and 600 in other international locations, including Europe and Asia/Pacific. Union recognition and collective bargaining arrangements are in place, covering approximately 3,900 persons (including approximately 2,100 in the United States). Management believes that it generally has a good relationship with both its unionized and non-unionized employees. 10 Item 2. Properties The general corporate offices of Acuity Brands are located in Atlanta, Georgia. Because of the diverse nature of operations and the large number of individual locations, it is neither practical nor meaningful to describe each of the operating facilities owned or leased by the Company. The following listing summarizes the significant facility categories by business: Division Owned Leased Nature of Facilities Lighting Equipment . . . . . Specialty Products . . . . . . . 17 1 2 8 4 10 1 — 7 8 5 20 2 41 3 9 Manufacturing Facilities Warehouses Distribution Centers Offices Manufacturing Facilities Warehouses/Branches Distribution Centers Offices The following table provides additional geographic information related to Acuity Brands’ manufacturing facilities: United States Canada Mexico Europe Total Lighting Equipment Owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2 Specialty Products Owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 3 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 1 1 — 1 3 4 2 6 — — 1 2 1 1 5 17 7 4 2 30 None of the individual properties of Acuity Brands is considered to have a value that is significant in relation to the assets of Acuity Brands as a whole. Though a loss at certain facilities could have an impact on the Company’s ability to serve the needs of its customers, the Company believes that the financial impact would be partially mitigated by various insurance programs in place. Acuity Brands believes that its properties are well maintained and are in good operating condition. Acuity Brands’ properties are suitable and adequate for its present needs. The Company believes that it has additional capacity available at most of its production facilities and that it could significantly increase production without substantial capital expenditures. As noted above, initiatives related to enhancing the global supply chain in the lighting equipment segment will result in the consolidation of up to seven manufacturing facilities over the next three years. However, the Company believes that the remaining facilities will have sufficient capacity to serve the needs of the customers of ABL. Item 3. Legal Proceedings General Acuity Brands is subject to various legal claims arising in the normal course of business, including patent infringement and product liability claims. Based on information currently available, and except as described below, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of pending and threatened legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Acuity Brands. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of such matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of Acuity Brands in future periods. Acuity Brands establishes reserves for legal claims when the costs associated with the claims become probable and can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be substantially higher than the amounts reserved for such claims. 11 Litigation In August 2003, ABL settled the patent infringement suit brought against it by Genlyte Thomas Group (“Genlyte”) in March 2000 in the United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky. In the suit, Genlyte claimed that a Lithonia Lighting® recessed downlighting product introduced in 1994 infringed a Genlyte patent. The Court had previously found that the product did infringe the patent but had not yet ruled whether the patent was invalid based on the contention of Acuity Brands that the claimed invention was obvious. The settlement agreement requires that Acuity Brands discontinue sales of the current version of the product by December 31, 2003, refrain from directly or indirectly challenging the validity of Genlyte’s patent, and pay $8.0 million to Genlyte. Acuity Brands recorded and paid the $8.0 million pre-tax settlement expense in its fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2003. Environmental Acuity Brands establishes reserves for known environmental claims when the costs associated with the claims become probable and can be reasonably estimated. The actual cost of environmental issues may be higher than that reserved due to difficulty in estimating such costs and potential changes in the status of government regulations. Certain environmental laws can impose liability regardless of fault. The federal Superfund law is an example of such an environmental law. However, management believes that the Company’s potential liability under Superfund is mitigated by the presence of other parties who will share in the costs associated with the clean up of sites. The extent of liability is determined on a case-by-case basis taking into account many factors, including the number of other parties whose status or activities also subjects them to liability regardless of fault. Acuity Brands is currently a party to, or otherwise involved in, legal proceedings in connection with state and federal Superfund sites. Based on information currently available, the Company believes its liability is immaterial at each of the currently active sites which it does not own where it has been named as a responsible party or a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) due to its limited involvement at the site and/or the number of viable PRPs. For example, the preliminary allocation among 48 PRPs at the Crymes Landfill site in Georgia indicates that Acuity Brands’ liability is not significant, and there are more than 1,000 PRPs at the M&J Solvents site in Georgia. For property that Acuity Brands owns on Seaboard Industrial Boulevard in Atlanta, Georgia, the Company has conducted an investigation on its property and adjoining properties and submitted a Compliance Status Report (“CSR”) and a proposed Corrective Action Plan (“CAP”) to the State of Georgia Environmental Protection Division (“EPD”) pursuant to the Georgia Hazardous Site Response Act. Until the EPD approves the CSR and CAP, Acuity Brands will not be able to determine whether corrective action will be required and what the costs of such action will be. In August 2003, ASP received a grand jury subpoena from the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia concerning the operation of ASP’s wastewater pretreatment plant and ASP’s management of hazardous waste at a facility in Atlanta, Georgia. The grand jury investigation appears to relate to the discharge of wastewater from the facility to the City of Atlanta’s sanitary sewer system and ASP’s practices in connection with the sampling of the facility’s wastewater discharges for permitting purposes. ASP is cooperating with the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and is in the process of completing the collection of the required documents. The U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation follows an inquiry by the City of Atlanta, which regulates the wastewater discharge at the facility. The Company has tentatively settled the matter with the City of Atlanta. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company recorded an aggregate charge of approximately $2.7 million to cover various costs including the estimated costs of resolution of these proceedings with the City of Atlanta and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, off-site disposal, and the estimated legal expenses to be incurred by the Company in these matters. The proceedings with the U.S. Attorney are at a preliminary stage, and developments in the investigation and the terms of any final settlement or adjudication of these matters could cause the Company to record additional charges in future periods. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders No matters were submitted for a vote of the security holders during the three months ended August 31, 2003. 12 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters The common stock of Acuity Brands is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AYI”. At October 23, 2003, there were 5,322 stockholders of record. The following table sets forth the New York Stock Exchange high and low sale prices and the dividend payments for Acuity Brands’ common stock for the periods indicated. 2003 First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2002 First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Price per Share High Low Dividends Per Share $15.60 $15.26 $16.57 $19.05 * $14.89 $19.40 $18.60 $11.00 $12.24 $12.71 $14.90 * $10.70 $14.00 $11.35 $0.15 $0.15 $0.15 $0.15 * $0.15 $0.15 $0.15 * Public trading of the Acuity Brands shares (other than on a when-issued basis) did not commence until December 3, 2001. The information required by this item with respect to equity compensation plans is included under the caption Disclosure with Respect to Equity Compensation Plans of the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held December 18, 2003, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference. 13 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated financial data of Acuity Brands, which have been derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements of Acuity Brands for each of the five years in the period ended August 31, 2003. The historical information may not be indicative of the Company’s future performance. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto. Operating expenses in the historical income statements prior to December 1, 2001 reflect direct expenses of the businesses of Acuity Brands together with allocations of certain NSI corporate expenses that were charged to Acuity Brands based on usage or other methodologies appropriate for such expenses. In the opinion of Acuity Brands management, these allocations have been made on a reasonable basis. Actual per-share data has not been presented since the businesses that comprise Acuity Brands were wholly-owned subsidiaries of NSI during all or a portion of such periods. Pro forma basic earnings per share as shown is calculated as net income divided by the historical NSI weighted average shares outstanding during the period. 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 Years Ended August 31, Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pro forma basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . $2,049,308 47,782 1.15 1.15 n/a (In thousands, except per-share data) $1,982,700 40,503 n/a n/a 0.99 $2,023,644 83,691 n/a n/a n/a $1,972,796 52,024 n/a n/a 1.26 $1,701,568 89,116 n/a n/a n/a Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt (excluding current portion) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends declared per common 1,288,219 1,357,954 1,330,575 1,422,880 1,337,038 391,469 445,808 410,630 543,121 373,707 608,830 380,518 636,434 435,199 544,577 share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.60 0.45 n/a n/a n/a In September 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Refer to Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the impact of the adoption of this standard on the Company’s net income and pro forma earnings per share. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Certain financial measures included in this section exclude items that are included in the most directly comparable U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) measures. A detailed reconciliation of these financial measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures is included below. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. References made to years are for fiscal year periods. Dollar amounts are in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated. The purpose of this discussion and analysis is to enhance the understanding and evaluation of the results of operations, financial position, cash flows, indebtedness, and other key financial information of Acuity Brands and its subsidiaries for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 and to describe certain potential risk factors associated with the Company. For a more complete understanding of this discussion, please read the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. Also, please refer to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2001 for additional information regarding the Company, its formation, and potential risk factors associated with the Spin-off. 14 Overview Company On November 7, 2001, the board of directors of National Service Industries, Inc. approved the Spin-off of its lighting equipment and specialty products businesses into a separate publicly traded company with its own management and board of directors. The Spin-off was effected on November 30, 2001 through a tax-free distribution to NSI stockholders of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of Acuity Brands, Inc., at that time a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSI owning and operating the lighting equipment and specialty products businesses. Each NSI stockholder of record as of November 16, 2001, the record date for the Distribution, received one share of Acuity Brands common stock for each share of NSI common stock held at that date. The Company operates on a fiscal year end of August 31. Therefore, the results of operations prior to November 30, 2001 are based on certain assumptions more fully described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Acuity Brands is a holding company that owns and manages two business units, each operating a collection of businesses, which sell products and provide services to customers in numerous channels, primarily for consumer, commercial, and industrial applications. The business units of Acuity Brands operate in two distinct segments based on the different products designed, manufactured, and distributed and the customers served: Acuity Brands Lighting (“ABL”) and Acuity Specialty Products Group (“ASP”). The Company believes ABL is one of the world’s leading manufacturers and distributors of lighting fixtures, with a broad, highly configurable product offering consisting of roughly 500,000 active products as part of over 2,000 product groups that are sold to approximately 5,000 customers. ABL operates 31 factories and distribution facilities to serve its extensive customer base. ASP is a leading producer and distributor of cleaning and maintenance products in North America and portions of Western Europe. ASP manufactures over 9,000 different products from six plants and serves over 300,000 customers through a network of distribution centers and warehouses. Acuity Brands, with its principal office in Atlanta, Georgia, has approximately 11,400 employees worldwide. While Acuity Brands is less than two years old, the two segments that make up the Company are comprised of organizations with long histories and well-known brands. Strategy A long-term objective of Acuity Brands is to be a broader, more diversified manufacturing and distribution organization capable of delivering consistent growth in earnings and cash flow. A broader and more diversified organization is one that creates less dependency on a single market or customer and generally reduces volatility in earnings and cash flow caused by the cyclicality of a dominant industry. Acuity Brands focused on the following four initiatives during fiscal 2003 directed at the achievement of the Company’s long-term financial goals of growing earnings per share in excess of 15 percent per annum, generating consolidated operating margins in excess of 10 percent, providing a return on stockholder’s equity of 15 percent or better, and reducing the Company’s debt to total capitalization ratio to below 40 percent: • Provide customers with superior, value-added products and services • Diversify the customer base and channels of distribution • Implement profit improvement and cost containment programs • Reduce debt Overall, fiscal 2003 proved to be a challenging year for Acuity Brands, enjoying success on many fronts while managing through a number of issues. These issues included difficult economic conditions that were more prolonged than many economists predicted at the start of the year. Although Gross Domestic Product in the United States, the Company’s primary area of operation, is expected to increase between two and three percent for calendar year 2003, continued weakness was particularly evident in certain key sectors of the economy, 15 including commercial construction, electrical utilities, and industrial manufacturing, many of which have reported declines from the previous year. For Acuity Brands, these conditions created a business environment characterized by weak demand in key markets, rising product-related costs (including steel and petroleum-based components), and pricing pressures from certain competitors. In addition, the Company experienced higher costs associated with non-discretionary spending for various insurance programs. The Company also resolved the patent litigation with Genlyte at ABL and addressed certain environmental matters at ASP. However, in spite of these issues, Acuity Brands grew sales by approximately four percent due primarily to initiatives to diversify the Company’s customer base and channels of distribution, largely through continued expansion into the home improvement channel at both ABL and ASP. Further, the Company made investments to expand and enlarge its global supply chain, to develop and introduce new products, to accelerate sales and marketing initiatives, and to implement new organizational development programs. The cost of many of these initiatives and the negative influences impacting the Company’s key markets was offset by profit improvement programs implemented to better manage working capital and control discretionary spending, to lower product costs, and to enhance manufacturing efficiencies. These actions allowed the Company to generate substantial cash flow and to reduce debt by $97.3 million during fiscal 2003 through a combination of operating income, improved working capital management, and the impact of profit improvement and cost containment programs implemented throughout the Company. During fiscal 2004, management intends to build on the success and momentum of initiatives implemented in prior years as well as new programs to enhance product development, productivity, and profitability. In 2004, the Company will focus on programs to enhance the following areas: • Pricing and selling effectiveness • Retail channel of distribution • Global supply chain • Information technology • Organizational development The expected outcome of these activities will be to better position the Company to deliver on its full potential, to provide a platform for future growth opportunities, and to allow the Company to achieve its long- term financial goals. See Outlook section below for additional information. Liquidity and Capital Resources Principal sources of liquidity for the Company are operating cash flows generated primarily from its business segments and various sources of borrowings. The capital structure of the Company is comprised principally of an asset-backed securitization program, borrowings from banks, senior notes, and the equity of its stockholders. The ability of the Company to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and to be able to access certain capital markets, including banks, is necessary for the Company to meet its obligations as they become due and maintain compliance with its debt covenants. The Company’s ongoing liquidity will depend on a number of factors, including available cash resources, cash flow from operations, and the Company’s ability to comply with covenants contained in certain of its financing agreements. Based on current earnings projections and prevailing market conditions, both for customer demand and various capital markets, the Company believes that over the next twelve months it will have sufficient liquidity and availability under its financing arrangements to fund its operations as currently planned and its anticipated capital investment and profit improvement initiatives, to repay borrowings as currently scheduled, to pay the same quarterly stockholder dividends in 2004 as were paid in 2003, and to make required contributions into the 16 Company’s defined benefit plans. The Company expects to invest between $50.0 million and $55.0 million for new plant and equipment during 2004. The increase in capital spending in fiscal 2004 compared to 2003 is due primarily to expenditures related to the consolidation of certain manufacturing facilities and enhancements to information technology capabilities within ABL and investments to improve manufacturing and waste management capabilities at ASP. Approximately 60 percent of the consolidated capital spending is expected to occur in the first half of 2004. As a consequence, the Company expects total indebtedness to increase by up to 10 percent in the first half of 2004 from $445.8 million reported at August 31, 2003. Overall, the Company expects to reduce total debt by the end of fiscal 2004 to approximately $400.0 million. See further information in the Outlook section below. Cash Flow The Company continues to generate substantial cash flow from operations. In 2003, the Company generated $160.3 million in cash flow from operations compared to $146.8 million and $183.7 million reported in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Earnings and improved working capital management in each segment were the primary contributors to the Company’s cash flow from operations in 2003, partially offset by the payment of approximately $8.0 million related to the settlement of litigation with Genlyte. The Company used its cash flow in 2003 primarily to reduce debt, to fund capital expenditures, and to fund quarterly dividend payments. Management believes that achieving the proper returns on its invested capital is a key factor in driving stockholder value. The Company spent $28.2 million and $33.5 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively, for new tooling, machinery and equipment. The decrease in spending in 2003 is due primarily to a slower pace of investment caused by the timing of the Company’s supply chain initiative at ABL. Over the last three years, the Company invested a total of $109.2 million for new plant, equipment and tooling primarily to improve increase manufacturing efficiencies, and enhance its customer service productivity and product quality, capabilities in each segment. As noted above, management expects capital spending to increase during 2004 primarily due to the consolidation of certain manufacturing facilities and enhancements to information technology capabilities within ABL and investments to improve manufacturing and waste management capabilities at ASP. The Company believes that these investments will enhance its operations and financial performance in the future. Consolidated working capital at August 31, 2003 was $199.1 million compared to $160.2 million at August 31, 2002, an increase of $38.9 million. Consolidated working capital at August 31, 2001 was $117.0 million. The increase in working capital in 2003 compared to 2002 was primarily due to reduced short-term borrowings partially offset by favorable declines in accounts receivable and inventory. More importantly, operating working capital (calculated by adding accounts receivable, net, plus inventory, and subtracting accounts payable) declined $52.6 million (14 percent) to $325.4 million at August 31, 2003 from the end of 2002 and $73.9 million (19 percent) from the end of 2001. The decline in operating working capital during 2003 was due primarily to lower accounts receivable resulting from more favorable terms negotiated with certain customers and lower inventory levels. The Company lowered inventory levels, primarily at ABL, because improved manufacturing efficiencies resulted in reduced cycle times and better coordination with vendors, while continuing to meet the needs of customers and increasing net sales. Operating working capital as a percentage of net sales at the end of 2003 declined to 16 percent from 19 percent in 2002. Despite the weak economic environment in 2003, the Company did manage to generate a significant amount of operating cash flow, which was used to reduce outstanding debt as more fully described below. At August 31, 2003, the current ratio of the Company improved to 1.55 compared to 1.37 at the end of 2002. The Company’s consolidated cash position grew to $16.1 million at August 31, 2003 compared to $2.7 million at August 31, 2002, primarily due to the timing of the availability of funds received from customers at year-end. 17 Contractual Obligations The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations at August 31, 2003: Long-term debt (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revolving Credit Facility (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term secured borrowings (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating leases (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other purchase obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total $392,808 5,000 48,000 89,454 390 Less than One Year $ 1,339 5,000 48,000 16,989 390 Payments Due by Period 1 to 3 Years 4 to 5 Years After 5 Years $19,988 — — 24,268 — $ 727 — — 13,440 — $370,754 — — 34,757 — Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $535,652 $71,718 $44,256 $14,167 $405,511 (1) These amounts are included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 4: Long-Term Debt and Lines of Credit for additional information regarding debt and other matters. (2) This amount is included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 4: Long-Term Debt and Lines of Credit for additional information regarding the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility. (3) This amount is included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Receivables pledged as security for borrowings under the Receivables Facility were $265.9 million at August 31, 2003. See Note 4: Long- Term Debt and Lines of Credit for additional information regarding the Company’s Receivables Facility. (4) The Company’s operating lease obligations are described in Note 6: Commitments and Contingencies. Capitalization Total debt outstanding at August 31, 2003 was $445.8 million compared to $543.1 million at August 31, 2002 and $643.7 million at November 30, 2001. This represents a decrease of $97.3 million (18 percent) and $197.9 million (31 percent) from August 31, 2002 and November 30, 2001, respectively. The decrease in fiscal 2003 was due primarily to the strong cash flow from operations, partially offset by capital expenditures and the payment of dividends. In April 2003, the Company modified certain terms and conditions of its Revolving Credit Facility primarily to extend the 364-day component of the credit facility and to incorporate changes to the Maximum Leverage Ratio, the ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation expense, and amortization expense) as such terms are defined in the Revolving Credit Facility. The Maximum Leverage Ratio, currently at 3.50, decreases to 3.25 at November 30, 2003, and then to 3.00 at May 31, 2004. The Leverage Ratio is computed at the end of each fiscal quarter. In addition, maximum available borrowings under the 364-day component of the Revolving Credit Facility, which now matures in April 2004, decreased to $92.5 million from $105.0 million. No changes were made to the maximum available borrowings or the maturity date of the three- year component of the credit facility. At August 31, 2003, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants in the Revolving Credit Facility and had additional borrowing capacity of $112.8 million under the most restrictive covenant in effect at that time. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding restrictions contained in the Revolving Credit Facility. During 2003, the Company’s consolidated stockholders’ equity increased $6.3 million to $408.3 million at August 31, 2003 as net income during 2003 was partially offset by dividend payments of $24.9 million and an after-tax adjustment of $22.5 million related to the Company’s pension obligations. The Company’s debt to total capital ratio was approximately 52 percent at August 31, 2003, down from approximately 58 percent at August 31, 2002. 18 Dividends The Company paid cash dividends on common stock of $24.9 million ($0.60 per share) during 2003 compared to $18.6 million in 2002. Prior to November 30, 2001, the Company was a subsidiary of NSI, as more fully described above, and did not pay dividends separately to stockholders of NSI. The Company does not currently have any plans to change its dividend rate; however, each quarterly dividend must be approved by the board of directors. Results of Operations Fiscal2003ComparedwithFiscal2002 Consolidated Results Consolidated net sales were $2.05 billion in 2003 compared to $1.97 billion reported in 2002, an increase of 3.9 percent. For the year ended August 31, 2003, the Company reported net income of $47.8 million compared to $52.0 million earned in 2002. Earnings per share were $1.15 in 2003 compared to $1.26 reported in 2002. Included in net income and earnings per share for 2003 were $8.0 million of pre-tax expense ($0.12 per share) related to the settlement of patent litigation with Genlyte (discussed below) and approximately $2.7 million of pre-tax expense ($0.04 per share) related to environmental matters at ASP (discussed below). In addition, the Company incurred approximately $2.0 million in legal costs over the past two years associated with the Genlyte patent litigation. Net sales increased approximately 4.3 percent and 2.5 percent at ABL and ASP, respectively, in spite of weak economic conditions in key markets. The increase in net sales at ABL was due primarily to greater shipments of products through channels of distribution serving national accounts and home improvement centers and to price increases for certain products. This was partially offset by lower shipments to certain other key commercial and industrial markets due primarily to the continued economic weakness that prevailed throughout the year. Net sales at ASP increased as greater shipments to mass merchandisers and home improvement centers and higher sales in Europe and Canada were partially offset by decreased net sales in the core industrial and institutional channel attributable to weak economic conditions. Consolidated operating profit was $110.3 million (5.4 percent of net sales) in 2003 compared to $120.1 million (6.1 percent of net sales) reported in 2002, a decrease of 8.2 percent. As noted above, 2003 operating profit included approximately $8.0 million of pre-tax expense related to the settlement of patent litigation with Genlyte and approximately $2.7 million of pre-tax expense related to certain environmental matters. Excluding these items, operating profit in 2003 would have been approximately $121.0 million (5.9 percent of net sales). The slight increase in operating profit in 2003, excluding the legal settlement and environmental matters, was due primarily to the additional contribution from the increase in sales noted above, offset primarily by pricing pressures from certain competitors, related costs (including steel and petroleum-based components), and non-discretionary spending for various insurance programs. The Company also made investments to expand its global supply chain, to develop and introduce new products, to accelerate sales and marketing initiatives, and to implement a new organizational development program. Overall in 2003, the Company was able to offset the cost of many of these new initiatives and the negative influences impacting the Company’s key markets through profit improvement programs implemented to better manage discretionary spending, to lower product costs (including strategic sourcing), and to enhance manufacturing efficiencies. rising product Consolidated gross profit margins increased to 41.6 percent of net sales in 2003 from 40.7 percent reported in 2002. Gross profit margins increased largely as a result of the higher net sales noted above and the impact of profit improvement initiatives that helped offset the cost of higher raw materials and expenses associated with the consolidation of certain manufacturing facilities at ABL. Operating expenses at Acuity Brands in 2003 were $741.2 million (36.2 percent of net sales) compared to $683.4 million (34.6 percent of net sales) in 2002. Benefits of cost containment programs throughout the Company were more than offset by increases in non- discretionary spending, the settlement of the Genlyte litigation, charges related to environmental matters at ASP, higher expenses for sales and marketing initiatives, higher logistics costs, and higher corporate expenses associated primarily with stock-based benefit programs. 19 Other income (expense), net, for Acuity Brands was made up primarily of interest expense and other miscellaneous, non-operating activity including the gain or loss on the sale of assets, certain restructuring charges, and gains or losses on foreign currency transactions. Interest expense, net was $37.4 million and $40.7 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Interest expense, net was down 8.1 percent in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily because of reduced levels of debt outstanding throughout the period. The Company generated a pre-tax gain of $1.4 million in fiscal 2003 compared to $3.2 million in fiscal 2002 on the sale of certain non-core assets. The effective tax rate reported by the Company was 36.0 percent and 37.2 percent in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Acuity Brands Lighting Acuity Brands Lighting reported net sales of approximately $1.54 billion and $1.47 billion for the years ending August 31, 2003, and 2002, respectively, an increase of 4.3 percent. The increase in net sales during 2003 was due primarily to greater shipments of products through channels of distribution serving national accounts and home improvement centers and the impact of price increases for certain products. This was partially offset by lower shipments to certain other key commercial and industrial markets due to the continued economic weakness that prevailed throughout the year. The backlog at ABL decreased $8.6 million, or 5.9 percent, to $136.1 million at August 31, 2003 from August 31, 2002. Operating profit increased 8.1 percent in 2003 to $96.8 million from $89.6 million reported in 2002. Operating profit in 2003 included $8.0 million of pre-tax expense related to the settlement of litigation with Genlyte discussed below. Excluding this item, operating profit would have increased 17.1 percent to $104.8 million. The increase in operating profit in 2003 was primarily the result of the contribution margin from the higher sales noted above and continuous improvement programs, including sourcing initiatives to lower product costs and improvements in the manufacturing operations at many ABL locations. These items were partially offset by costs associated with the consolidation of certain manufacturing facilities, higher raw materials costs, greater spending for sales and marketing initiatives associated with new product introductions and penetration of the home improvement channel, and higher logistics costs. In August 2003, ABL settled a patent infringement suit brought against it by Genlyte in March 2000 in the United States District Court, Western District of Kentucky. Acuity Brands recorded and paid the $8.0 million pre-tax settlement expense in its fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2003. See Item 3: Legal Proceedings for more information regarding the settlement. ABL will discontinue sales of the product as currently designed and will begin manufacturing an alternative design late in calendar 2003 so that it will be available by January 1, 2004. The Company does not expect any disruption of service to customers. Acuity Specialty Products Net sales at ASP were $510.6 million in 2003 compared with $497.9 million in 2002. The increase in 2003 net sales was primarily due to greater shipments to mass merchandisers and home improvement centers and higher net sales in Europe and Canada, partially offset by softness in the core industrial and institutional channel attributable to weak economic conditions. In the retail channel, sales increased in 2003 due primarily to the number of home improvement centers served and greater shipments to mass merchandisers. Operating profit decreased 30.3 percent in 2003 to $31.3 million from $44.9 million reported in 2002. The decrease in operating profit in 2003 was primarily the result of the higher costs for certain initiatives, including new product introductions, increased spending to penetrate the mass merchandise channel, and expanded sales, marketing and logistics programs; rising costs for certain raw materials, partially offset by various initiatives to reduce expenses; a $2.7 million charge related to environmental matters; and a $1.9 million charge to reflect the fair market value of certain inventories. See Item 3: Legal Proceedings for more information regarding the environmental matters at ASP. 20 Corporate Corporate expenses increased to $17.9 million in 2003 from $14.4 million reported in 2002. The increase in corporate expense in 2003 was primarily due to increased expenses associated with certain stock-based benefit programs, liability insurance, and expanded audit services. Fiscal 2002 Compared with Fiscal 2001 Consolidated Results Fiscal 2002 can best be characterized as managing well to modestly mitigate the effects of a difficult economic environment. While many economists were predicting a soft landing for the economy, with a rebound expected in the second half of the Company’s fiscal year, it became evident early on that this was not going to be the case, particularly in the Company’s largest market, the non-residential, commercial construction industry. The impact on Acuity Brands of this weak economic environment was lower shipments of products to customers in many of its key sales channels in both segments and severe price competition for remaining orders, primarily in the commercial construction market. This, along with rising costs in non-discretionary areas such as insurance, made expanding profitability very difficult. As a consequence, management initiated programs to adapt to these changing market conditions by focusing on other levers to drive financial performance, including generating additional revenue from new products and channels of distribution, implementing various profit improvement and cost containment programs to limit spending and improve manufacturing efficiencies, and generating free cash flow through better working capital utilization. These concerted actions allowed the Company to generate substantial cash flow in 2002 and modest earnings while continuing to serve its vast customer base. Overall, consolidated net sales were $1.97 billion in 2002 compared to $1.98 billion reported in 2001. For the year ended August 31, 2002, the Company reported net income of $52.0 million compared to $40.5 million earned in 2001. Earnings per share were $1.26 in 2002 compared to $0.99 reported in 2001. Excluding the results from the divestiture of certain foreign operations of ASP in fiscal 2001 and the acquisition of American Electric Lighting® (“American Electric”) in early fiscal 2002, net sales would have been $1.91 billion in 2002 and $1.96 billion in 2001. Similarly, excluding the pre-tax impact of $3.2 million in gains on the sale of assets and $0.9 million for the reversal of certain restructuring expenses, net income in 2002 would have been $49.5 million, or $1.20 per share. In 2001, net income would have been $66.7 million, or $1.63 per share, excluding the pre-tax impact of the $15.3 million loss from the divested operations at ASP, $4.1 million for restructuring and impairment charges, $3.1 million for the termination of a purchase obligation, and $12.1 million in discontinued amortization expense from the adoption of SFAS No. 142. Please refer to Notes 2 and 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which more fully describe the discontinuation of amortization of goodwill and certain intangibles, the acquisition of American Electric, and the divestiture of the foreign operations of ASP. Excluding the acquisition of American Electric and the divesture of the foreign operations noted above, net sales at Acuity Brands decreased approximately three percent in 2002 when compared to 2001. The decline occurred at ABL and was partially offset by a modest increase at ASP. The decline was primarily due to soft demand and lower selling prices at ABL for certain types of fixtures for industrial and office applications, partially offset by an increase in sales through the retail channel at both ABL and ASP. Consolidated operating profit was down 13.9 percent in 2002 to $120.1 million (6.1 percent of net sales) from $139.6 million (7.0 percent of net sales) reported in 2001. The decline in operating profit in 2002 was primarily a result of the lost contribution margin on the lower sales noted above, including price erosion experienced in certain key lighting fixture markets, and higher spending for non-discretionary items, partially offset by various profit improvement and cost containment programs and lower corporate expenses. Consolidated gross profit margins declined to 40.7 percent of net sales in 2002 from 42.4 percent reported in 2001. The decline in gross profit margins occurred primarily at ABL due to the impact of significant price competition noted above, partially offset by lower costs and expenses due to various profit improvement initiatives and cost containment programs implemented in 2002. Gross profit margins remained essentially flat at ASP over the two-year period. Operating expenses at Acuity Brands in 2002 were $683.4 million (34.6 percent of net sales) compared to 21 $701.8 million (35.4 percent of net sales) in 2001. Excluding amortization expense, operating expenses as a percentage of sales in 2002 remained essentially the same as 2001. Benefits of cost containment programs throughout the Company were primarily offset by increases in non-discretionary spending. Other income (expense), net, for Acuity Brands is made up primarily of interest expense and other miscellaneous, non-operating activity including the gain or loss on the sale of assets, certain restructuring charges, and gains or losses on foreign currency transactions. Interest expense, net was $40.7 million and $48.8 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Interest expense, net was down 16.6 percent in 2002 compared to 2001 primarily because of reduced levels of debt outstanding throughout the period and lower interest rates for much of 2002. In 2002, the Company generated a pre-tax gain of $3.2 million on the sale of certain non-core assets. In 2001, the Company incurred other expenses associated with non-operating activities totaling a pre-tax loss of $21.6 million, primarily for the loss associated with the disposal of certain foreign assets at ASP and restructuring and other charges related to non-operating activities of the Company. The effective tax rate reported by the Company was 37.2 percent and 41.4 percent in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decline in the tax rate was primarily the result of the legal entity restructuring that occurred in connection with the Spin-off and the elimination of amortization of goodwill. Acuity Brands Lighting Acuity Brands Lighting reported net sales of approximately $1.47 billion for each of the years ending August 31, 2002 and 2001. Excluding net sales contributed from the acquisition of American Electric Lighting in October 2001, net sales would have decreased approximately 4.1 percent during 2002. The decline in net sales during 2002 was due primarily to lower shipments to certain commercial and industrial markets and reduced selling prices for certain key products due to intense price competition for available orders. Operating profit was down 24.6 percent in 2002 to $89.6 million (6.1 percent of net sales) from $118.8 million (8.1 percent of net sales) reported in 2001. The decline in operating profit in 2002 was primarily the result of the lost contribution on the lower sales noted above due principally to product mix changes and price erosion experienced in certain lighting fixture markets, higher spending for non-discretionary items such as medical and property insurance, and greater investments in certain sales and marketing programs. This decline was partially offset by profit improvement initiatives and cost containment programs that reduced costs and improved productivity in key factories in 2002. These programs included efforts to source materials more effectively, streamline production through better integration with suppliers and eliminate costs associated with non-value added activities. Also, ABL expanded its channels of distribution and the types of customers served in 2002. The adoption of a new accounting standard that eliminated amortization of goodwill and certain intangibles contributed approximately $10.0 million to operating profit at ABL. Acuity Specialty Products Net sales at ASP were $497.9 million in 2002, compared with $514.1 million reported in 2001. Excluding the results from the divestiture of certain foreign operations during 2001, net sales would have been $493.7 million in 2001. The increase in 2002 net sales was primarily due to continued strength in the retail sector and, to a lesser extent, in certain niche markets. Operating profit increased 8.7 percent in 2002 to $44.9 million (9.1 percent of net sales) from $41.3 million (8.1 percent of net sales) reported in 2001. Excluding the results from the divestiture of certain foreign operations during 2001, operating profit would have been $42.0 million in 2001. The increase in operating profit in 2002 was primarily the result of the profit contribution on higher volumes, the impact of profit improvement programs, and the elimination of approximately $2.1 million of amortization expense. These items were partially offset by greater investments in sales initiatives and higher insurance costs. ASP implemented programs such as sourcing initiatives, cost containment programs and aggressive marketing strategies that allowed the segment to produce solid financial performance while expanding penetration of key market niches and further diversifying the customer base. Unfortunately in 2002, many of those efforts merely offset the impact of rising costs for insurance programs. 22 Corporate Corporate expenses decreased 30.2 percent in 2002 to $14.4 million from $20.6 million reported in 2001. The decrease in corporate expense in 2002 was primarily due to cost containment programs and the reorganization of the corporate staff. Outlook Management projects total year earnings for 2004 to be between $1.25 and $1.45 per share compared to $1.15 per share reported in 2003. The range for 2004 is based on the current economic environment and assumes that the Company’s key markets do not deteriorate further. Included in the projected earnings per share range for 2004 for Acuity Brands are incremental expenses anticipated for stock-based plans (approximately $7.2 million pre-tax, or $0.11 per share), primarily related to stock-based awards expected to be granted in the second quarter of 2004, and for pension expense (approximately $3.8 million, pre-tax, or $0.06 per share), due primarily to declines in the discount rates used to compute the 2004 expense and the August 31, 2003 pension obligations. In 2004, the Company anticipates that various profit improvement programs and changes in product mix will more than offset expected higher costs for wages and employee benefits, insurance programs, and raw materials, all of which could be significant, and the potential impact of pricing pressures driven by over-capacity and weak customer demand in key markets in North America. The Company expects earnings in the first half of 2004 to approximate those reported in the same period in 2003, given the negative impact of the items noted above and current economic conditions, and expects improvement in the second half of fiscal 2004 due primarily to the anticipated seasonal pattern and the benefit of profit improvement programs, some of which are just now getting underway. Management of Acuity Brands remains confident in the long-term potential of the businesses that comprise Acuity Brands and the expected impact of the initiatives the Company continues to implement. However, management continues to be cautious about near-term results due primarily to uncertainty in the economic environment, particularly for non-residential construction and certain industrial markets. While some economists and forecasting organizations continue to predict that the domestic economy will improve in the near-term, management does not expect any significant rebound until late in 2004 nor does management expect that this late recovery will meaningfully impact 2004. As a consequence, the Company is preparing for another year of very difficult conditions. Based on management’s current view of the economy and demand in the Company’s key markets, management expects net sales to improve nominally in 2004 compared to 2003. Therefore, the Company expects that a substantial portion of any improvement in earnings in 2004 compared to 2003 will be due primarily to benefits from profit improvement initiatives aimed at creating a stronger, more capable organization. The focus of the organization will remain on improving the products and services provided to customers, becoming more productive and efficient, and enhancing profitability while continuing to diversify and expand the many end markets and customers served. As part of that effort in 2003, the Company commenced an initiative to improve the capabilities and cost structure of the manufacturing, distribution and procurement base at ABL. This multi-faceted initiative, which will take almost three years to complete, will result in the consolidation of certain facilities into ABL’s most productive and efficient plants as well as expand the worldwide sourcing capabilities of ABL. A significant portion of the capital investment for this initiative will occur in 2004, while the expenses associated with the consolidation for severance and relocation are expected to be largely offset by cost savings and asset sales from the program. While the timing of expense recognition will depend on the actual dates of certain events and may impact the Company’s quarterly results differently than management currently anticipates, management expects that the program will have a relatively neutral impact on 2004 earnings per share. The Company expects the benefits from this program to have a positive impact on earnings in 2005. 23 Critical Accounting Policies Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses the financial condition and results of operations as reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. As discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to inventory valuation; depreciation, amortization and the recoverability of long-lived assets, including intangible assets; medical, product warranty and other litigation; and environmental matters. Management bases its estimates and judgments on its substantial historical experience and other relevant factors, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of the accounting policies of Acuity Brands. reserves; The management of Acuity Brands believes the following represent the Company’s critical accounting policies: Inventories Acuity Brands records inventory at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. Management reviews inventory quantities on hand and records a provision for excess or obsolete inventory primarily based on estimated future demand and current market conditions. A significant change in customer demand or market conditions could render certain inventory obsolete and thus could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operating results in the period the change occurs. Long-Lived and Intangible Assets and Goodwill Acuity Brands reviews goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for impairment on an annual basis or on an interim basis if an event occurs that might reduce the fair value of the long-lived asset below its carrying value. All other long-lived and intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized based on the difference between the carrying value of the asset and its estimated fair value, which would be determined based on either discounted future cash flows or other appropriate fair value methods. In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS No. 142”), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Acuity Brands adopted SFAS No. 142 as of September 1, 2001. SFAS No. 142 requires companies to cease amortizing goodwill that existed at June 30, 2001 and establishes a new method for testing goodwill for impairment. SFAS No. 142 also requires that an identifiable intangible asset that is determined to have an indefinite useful economic life not be amortized, but be separately tested for impairment using a fair-value-based approach. The evaluation of goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives for impairment requires management to use significant judgments and estimates including, but not limited to, projected future net sales, operating results, and cash flow of each of the Company’s businesses. Although management currently believes that the estimates used in the evaluation of goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives are reasonable, differences between actual and expected net sales, operating results, and cash flow could cause these assets to be deemed impaired. If this were to occur, the Company would be required to charge to earnings the write-down in value of such assets, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial position. 24 Specifically, Acuity Brands has two unamortized trade names with an aggregate carrying value of $65.0 million. Management estimates the fair value of these unamortized trade names using a fair value model based on discounted future cash flows. Future cash flows associated with each of the Company’s unamortized trade names are calculated by applying a theoretical royalty rate a willing third party would pay for use of the particular trade name to estimated future net sales. The present value of the resulting after-tax cash flow is management’s current estimate of the fair value of the trade names. This fair value model requires management to make several significant assumptions, including estimated future net sales, the royalty rate, and the discount rate. Differences between expected and actual results can result in significantly different valuations. If future operating results are unfavorable compared to forecasted amounts, the Company may be required to reduce the theoretical royalty rate used in the fair value model. A reduction in the theoretical royalty rate would result in lower expected, future after-tax cash flow in the valuation model. Accordingly, an impairment charge would be recorded at that time. To illustrate the potential impact of unfavorable changes in the assumptions underlying the fair value model, a one hundred basis point reduction in the theoretical royalty rate related to the 2003 valuation of the Holophane trade name acquired in 1999 would result in a pre-tax impairment charge of approximately 28 percent, or $17.6 million, of the carrying value of the trade name. Self-Insurance It is the policy of the Company to self-insure for certain insurable property and casualty risks consisting loss to property, business interruptions resulting from property losses, workers’ primarily of physical compensation, comprehensive general liability, and auto liability. Insurance coverage is obtained for catastrophic property and casualty exposures as well as those risks required to be insured by law or contract. Based on an independent actuary’s estimate of the aggregate liability for claims incurred, a provision for claims under the self-insured program is recorded and revised annually. The actuarial estimates are subject to uncertainty from various sources, including, among others, changes in claim reporting patterns, claim settlement patterns, judicial decisions, legislation, and economic conditions. Although Acuity Brands believes that the actuarial estimates are reasonable, significant differences related to the items noted above could materially affect the Company’s self- insurance obligations and future expense. The Company is also self-insured for the majority of its medical benefit plans. The Company estimates its aggregate liability for claims incurred by applying a lag factor to the Company’s historical claims and administrative cost experience. The appropriateness of the Company’s lag factor is evaluated and revised, if the current estimates are reasonable, significant necessary, annually. Although management believes that differences related to claim reporting patterns, legislation, and general economic conditions could materially affect the Company’s medical benefit plan liabilities and future expense. Product Warranty Acuity Brands records an allowance for the estimated amount of future warranty costs when the related revenue is recognized, primarily based on historical experience. Although historical warranty costs have been within expectations, there can be no assurance that future warranty costs will not exceed historical amounts. If actual future warranty costs exceed historical amounts, additional allowances may be required, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operating results in future periods. Litigation Acuity Brands recognizes expense for legal claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and can be reasonably estimated. Due to the difficulty in estimating costs of resolving legal claims, actual costs may be substantially higher than the amounts reserved. 25 Environmental Matters The Company recognizes expense for known environmental claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. The actual cost of resolving environmental issues may be higher than that reserved primarily due to difficulty in estimating such costs and potential changes in the status of government regulations. Summary of Non-GAAP Financial Measures (Amounts in thousands, except per-share data) Net sales, net income, and operating profit before certain items is reported GAAP net sales, net income, and operating profit excluding certain charges or gains recognized during fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001 and certain acquired or divested operations. Net sales, net income, and operating profit before these items should not be considered as a substitute for GAAP net sales, net income, or operating profit as an indicator of the Company’s financial performance. However, the Company believes these measures enable stockholders to perform meaningful comparisons of operating results from year to year. A detailed reconciliation of GAAP net sales, net income, and operating profit to net sales, net income, and operating profit before these items is set forth in the tables below: Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002 Net Income and Earnings per Share Reconciliation Year Ended August 31, Net Income Diluted Earnings Per Share Pro Forma Earnings Per Share (1) 2003 2002 2003 2002 Net income before patent litigation settlement and wastewater- related charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Patent litigation settlement Wastewater-related charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $54,630 (5,120) (1,728) $52,024 — — $ 1.31 (0.12) (0.04) GAAP net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $47,782 $52,024 $ 1.15 $1.26 — — $1.26 Operating Profit Reconciliation ABL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended August 31, 2003 GAAP Operating Profit Patent Litigation Settlement Wastewater-related Charges $ 96,825 31,313 (17,862) $110,276 $8,000 — — $8,000 $ — 2,700 — $2,700 Operating Profit Before Patent Litigation Settlement and Wastewater-related Charges $104,825 34,013 (17,862) $120,976 26 Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001 Fiscal 2001 Net Sales Reconciliation ABL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended August 31, 2001 GAAP Net Sales $1,468,558 514,142 $1,982,700 American Electric Certain Foreign Operations at ASP $— — $— $ — 20,482 $20,482 Net Sales Excluding American Electric and Certain Foreign Operations at ASP $1,468,558 493,660 $1,962,218 Fiscal 2002 Net Sales Reconciliation ABL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended August 31, 2002 GAAP Net Sales $1,474,882 497,914 $1,972,796 American Electric $66,799 — $66,799 Certain Foreign Operations at ASP Net Sales Excluding American Electric and Certain Foreign Operations at ASP $— — $— $1,408,083 497,914 $1,905,997 Net Income and Earnings per Share Reconciliation Year Ended August 31, Pro Forma Earnings per Share (1) Net Income 2002 2001 Net income before certain items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructure charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on sale of certain foreign operations at ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . Termination of purchase contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discontinued amortization expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $49,470 2,018 536 — — — $ 66,745 — (2,572) (10,836) (1,953) (10,881) GAAP net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $52,024 $ 40,503 2002 $1.20 0.05 0.01 — — — $1.26 Consolidated Operating Expense Reconciliation Year Ended August 31, Percent of Net Sales 2001 2002 Operating expenses before amortization expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $679,071 4,316 34.4% $683,793 17,965 2001 $ 1.63 — (0.06) (0.26) (0.05) (0.27) $ 0.99 Percent of Net Sales 34.5% GAAP operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $683,387 34.6% $701,758 35.4% ASP Operating Profit Reconciliation Operating profit before certain foreign operations at ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Certain foreign operations at ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP operating profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended August 31, 2001 $42,032 (695) $41,337 (1) Actual per share data has not been presented for periods prior to the second quarter of fiscal year 2002 since the businesses that comprise Acuity Brands were wholly owned subsidiaries of National Service Industries, Inc. during those periods. Additionally, public trading of the Acuity Brands shares (other than on a when-issued basis) did not commence until December 3, 2001; therefore, no historical market share prices exist for the calculation of the potential dilutive effect of stock options for the periods prior to the second quarter of fiscal year 2002. As a result, pro forma diluted earnings per share is not presented for those periods. 27 Calculation of Working Capital, Operating Working Capital, and Ratio of Debt-to-Total Capitalization (Amounts in thousands) Detailed calculations related to various liquidity measures included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are set forth in the tables below. Calculation of Working Capital Current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 558,552 (359,451) $ 590,997 (430,807) $ 559,116 (442,067) Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 199,101 $ 160,190 $ 117,049 2003 August 31, 2002 2001 Calculation of Operating Working Capital 2003 August 31, 2002 2001 Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 302,276 188,799 (165,656) $ 322,735 216,942 (161,713) $ 296,900 210,783 (108,380) Operating working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 325,419 $ 377,964 $ 399,303 Ratio of Debt-to-Total Capitalization Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $445,808 408,294 $543,121 401,952 Total capitalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $854,102 $945,073 Debt-to-total capitalization ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52% 58% August 31, 2003 2002 Risk Factors Risks Relating to the Distribution Prior to November 30, 2001, Acuity Brands was a wholly-owned subsidiary of National Service Industries, Inc. owning and operating the lighting equipment and specialty products businesses. Acuity Brands was spun off from NSI into a separate publicly traded company with its own management and board of directors through a tax- free distribution of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of Acuity Brands on November 30, 2001. Each NSI stockholder of record as of November 16, 2001, the record date for the Distribution, received one share of Acuity Brands common stock for each share of NSI common stock held at that date. The following risks associated with Acuity Brands relate principally to the Distribution. If any of these risks develops into an actual event, the business, financial condition or results of operations of Acuity Brands could be materially adversely affected. Creditors of NSI May Challenge the Distribution as a Fraudulent Conveyance On November 7, 2001, the NSI board of directors made a determination, based on information provided by management and financial experts, that the Distribution was permissible under applicable dividend and solvency laws. There is no certainty, however, that a court would find the decision of the NSI board to be binding on creditors of NSI and Acuity Brands or that a court would reach the same conclusions as the NSI board in 28 determining whether NSI or Acuity Brands was insolvent at the time of, or after giving effect to, the Distribution. If a court in a lawsuit by an unpaid creditor or representative of creditors, such as a trustee in bankruptcy, were to find that at the time NSI effected the Distribution, NSI or Acuity Brands (1) was insolvent; (2) was rendered insolvent by reason of the Distribution; (3) was engaged in a business or transaction for which their respective remaining assets constituted unreasonably small capital; or (4) intended to incur, or believed it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay as such debts matured, such court may be asked to void the Distribution (in whole or in part) as a fraudulent conveyance and require that the stockholders return the Acuity Brands shares (in whole or in part) to NSI or require Acuity Brands to fund certain liabilities for the benefit of creditors. The measure of insolvency for purposes of the foregoing would vary depending upon the jurisdiction whose law is being applied. Generally, however, NSI or Acuity Brands would be considered insolvent if the fair value of their respective assets was less than the amount of their respective liabilities or if they incurred debt beyond their ability to repay such debt as it matures. As noted above, the NSI board of directors determined that the Distribution was permissible under applicable dividend and solvency laws. This conclusion was based on numerous factors including, but not limited to, the allocation of assets and liabilities contemplated by the Spin-off. The allocation of assets and liabilities associated with the Distribution left NSI appropriately capitalized with approximately $5.0 million in debt. In addition, certain assets with substantial market value, such as the real property related to NSI’s corporate headquarters, remained with NSI. Accordingly, management believes the likelihood that creditors of NSI could successfully challenge the Distribution is remote. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, a third party acquired NSI through a merger approved by NSI shareholders. Management believes that this transaction is strong confirmation that NSI was solvent at the time of the Distribution and remained solvent when it was acquired by the third party. The acquirer invested equity as well as funds borrowed from secured lenders. The willingness of the acquirer to invest funds, as well as the willingness of the lenders to loan funds to acquire NSI, represents an independent market assessment of NSI’s continuing solvency, which the Company believes further diminishes the likelihood that creditors of NSI could successfully challenge the Distribution. Failure to Qualify as a Tax-Free Transaction Could Result in Substantial Liability that for U.S. Federal NSI and Acuity Brands intended for the Distribution to be tax-free for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, and management of Acuity Brands believes the Distribution was tax-free for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. The Distribution was conditioned upon the receipt by each of NSI and Acuity Brands of opinions from each of King & Spalding, counsel to NSI and Acuity Brands, and Ernst & Young LLP, special tax advisor to NSI and Acuity Brands, income tax purposes the receipt of Acuity Brands shares by NSI stockholders was tax-free. Neither NSI nor Acuity Brands requested an advance ruling from the Internal Revenue Service as to the tax consequences of the Distribution. The opinions of King & Spalding and Ernst & Young LLP are subject to certain assumptions and the accuracy and completeness of certain factual representations and statements made by NSI and Acuity Brands and certain other data, documentation and other materials that each of King & Spalding and Ernst & Young LLP deemed necessary for purposes of their respective opinions. If these assumptions and factual representations were incorrect or incomplete in a material respect, the conclusions set forth in the opinions may not be correct. These opinions represent the views of King & Spalding and Ernst & Young LLP as to the interpretation of existing tax law and accordingly, such opinions are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or the courts and no assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service or the courts will agree with their opinions. If the Distribution does not qualify for tax-free treatment, a substantial corporate tax would be payable by the consolidated group of which NSI is the common parent measured by the difference between (1) the aggregate fair market value of the Acuity Brands shares on the Distribution Date and (2) NSI’s adjusted tax basis in the Acuity Brands shares on the Distribution Date. The corporate level tax would be payable by NSI. However, Acuity Brands agreed under certain circumstances to indemnify NSI for all or a portion of this tax liability. This 29 indemnification obligation, if triggered, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial position of Acuity Brands. In addition, under the applicable treasury regulations, each member of NSI’s consolidated group (including Acuity Brands) is severally liable for such tax liability. Furthermore, if the Distribution does not qualify as tax-free, each NSI stockholder who received Acuity Brands shares in the Distribution would be taxed as if he had received a cash dividend equal to the fair market value of his Acuity Brands shares on the Distribution Date. Even if the Distribution qualifies as tax-free, NSI could nevertheless incur a substantial corporate tax liability under Section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if NSI or Acuity Brands were to undergo a change in control (whether by acquisition, additional share issuance or otherwise) pursuant to a plan or series of related transactions which include the Distribution. Any transaction, which occurs within the four- year period beginning two years prior to the Distribution, is presumed to be part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the Distribution unless NSI establishes otherwise. Under certain circumstances, Acuity Brands would be obligated to indemnify NSI for all or a portion of this substantial corporate tax liability under the tax disaffiliation agreement. This indemnification obligation would have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial position of Acuity Brands. As required under the tax disaffiliation agreement, King & Spalding issued an opinion to NSI to the effect that the third party acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of NSI through a merger and the transactions contemplated therein will not cause Section 355(e) or 355(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to apply to NSI’s spin-off of Acuity Brands. Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information This filing contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that involve risks and uncertainties. Consequently, actual results may differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Statements made herein that may be considered forward- looking include statements that relate to future performance or results of the Company, including in particular statements concerning: (a) the expected impact (including the timing of the expected benefits) of the Company’s global supply chain initiative at ABL including a reduction and consolidation of up to seven manufacturing facilities, increased production in international locations, a reduction in the number of suppliers, increased worldwide procurement and sourcing of certain raw materials, component parts, and finished goods, the ability of the Company to continue to serve the needs of its customers after the consolidation of the manufacturing facilities, and the impact of this initiative on future earnings and capital investment; (b) the potential impact of the loss of any one supplier of outsourced product at ASP; (c) the potential impact of the loss of certain of the Company’s facilities and the related impact of various insurance programs in place; (d) the Company’s expectations regarding liquidity and availability under its financing arrangements to fund its operations, capital investments, profit improvement initiatives, debt payments, dividend payments, and required contributions into its pension plans; (e) planned spending of between $50.0 million and $55.0 million for new plant and equipment during 2004 (including the timing of these expenditures) and the expected future impact of these expenditures on the Company’s future operations and performance; (f) expected changes in total indebtedness (including the timing of the changes in total indebtedness); (g) management’s expectations regarding the production of an alternative design related to the Genlyte patent litigation and the impact of this change on customer service levels; (h) future revenue and earnings (including the timing of the future revenue and earnings within fiscal 2004); (i) anticipated future expenses associated with stock-based plans and pension obligations; (j) expected future benefits of the Company’s profit improvement programs and changes in product mix; and (k) management’s expectations regarding a recovery in the domestic economy. A variety of risks and uncertainties could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties include without limitation the following: (a) the uncertainty of general business and economic 30 conditions, including the potential for a more severe slowdown in non-residential construction and other industrial markets, changes in interest rates, and fluctuations in commodity and raw material prices or foreign currency rates; (b) the Company’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits of initiatives expected to reduce costs, improve profits, enhance customer service, increase manufacturing efficiency, reduce debt, and expand product offerings and brands in the market through a variety of channels; (c) the risk that the Company will be unable to execute its various initiatives within expected timeframes; (d) unexpected developments in the Company’s legal and environmental matters, including the matter related to the operation of ASP’s wastewater pretreatment plant and ASP’s management of hazardous waste at a facility in Atlanta, Georgia; (e) the risk that projected future cash flows from operations are not realized; (f) the potential that additional shares under the Company’s long-term incentive program are not approved by shareholders; (g) the possibility that a new accounting standard related to the recognition of expense associated with stock-based compensation will be promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board; (h) the impact of competition; (i) unexpected changes in the Company’s share price and (j) the risk that underlying assumptions or expectations related to Distribution prove to be inaccurate or unrealized. Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk General. Acuity Brands is exposed to market risks that may impact the Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income, and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows due primarily to changing interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Acuity Brands does not currently participate in any significant hedging activities, nor does it currently utilize any significant derivative financial instruments. Acuity Brands does not engage in speculative transactions, nor does Acuity Brands hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. The following discussion provides additional information regarding Acuity Brands’ market risks. Interest Rates. Interest rate fluctuations expose Acuity Brands’ variable-rate debt to changes in interest expense and cash flows. The variable-rate debt of Acuity Brands, primarily short-term secured borrowings and amounts outstanding under the Company’s Term Loan, amounted to $85.8 million at August 31, 2003. Based on outstanding borrowings at year-end, a 10 percent increase in market interest rates at August 31, 2003 would have resulted in additional annual after-tax interest expense of approximately $0.1 million. A fluctuation in interest rates would not affect interest expense or cash flows related to the $360.0 million publicly traded notes, Acuity Brands’ primary fixed-rate debt. A 10 percent increase in market interest rates at August 31, 2003 would have decreased the fair value of these notes by approximately $11.1 million. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s long-term debt. Foreign Exchange Rates. The substantial majority of Acuity Brands’ revenue, expense, and capital purchases are transacted in U.S. dollars. Acuity Brands does not believe a 10 percent fluctuation in average foreign currency rates would have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. 31 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Index to Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Report of Independent Auditors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Report of Independent Public Accountants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 31, 2003 and 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended Page 33 34 35 36 37 38 August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 40-65 79 32 REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ACUITY BRANDS, INC. The management of Acuity Brands, Inc. is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the financial information in this annual report. These financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, using informed judgments and estimates where appropriate. The information in other sections of this report is consistent with the financial statements. The Company maintains a system of internal controls and accounting policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and transactions are executed and recorded in accordance with management’s authorization. The audit committee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of outside directors, is responsible for monitoring the Company’s accounting and reporting practices. The audit committee meets regularly with management, the internal auditors, and the independent auditors to review the work of each and to assure that each performs its responsibilities. Both the internal auditors and Ernst & Young LLP have unrestricted access to the audit committee allowing open discussion, without management’s presence, on the quality of financial reporting and the adequacy of internal accounting controls. James S. Balloun Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer Vernon J. Nagel Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 33 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Board of Directors and Stockholders Acuity Brands, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Acuity Brands, Inc. (formerly the National Service Industries, Inc. lighting equipment and specialty products businesses) as of August 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These consolidated financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedule based on our audit. The consolidated financial statements and schedule of the National Service Industries, Inc. lighting equipment and specialty products businesses for the year ended August 31, 2001, were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and whose report dated October 12, 2001 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements and schedule. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Acuity Brands, Inc. at August 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in 2002 the Company ceased amortization of goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As discussed above, the financial statements of the National Service Industries, Inc. lighting equipment and specialty products businesses for the year ended August 31, 2001, were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. As described in Note 2, the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended August 31, 2001 have been revised to include transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which was adopted by the Company as of September 1, 2001. Our audit procedures with respect to the disclosures in Note 2 with respect to 2001 included (a) agreeing the previously reported net income to the previously issued financial statements and the adjustments to reported net income representing amortization expense (including any related tax effects) recognized in those periods related to goodwill and other intangible assets that are no longer being amortized as a result of initially applying Statement No. 142 (including any related tax effects) to the Company’s underlying records obtained from management, and (b) testing the mathematical accuracy of the reconciliation of adjusted net income to reported net income and the related earnings-per-share amounts. In our opinion, the disclosures for 2001 in Note 2 are appropriate. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 financial statements of the Company other than with respect to such disclosures and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2001 financial statements taken as a whole. Atlanta, Georgia October 2, 2003 Ernst & Young LLP 34 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS NOTE: This is a copy of a report previously issued by Arthur Andersen LLP, the Company’s former independent accountants. The Arthur Andersen LLP report refers to certain financial information for the years ended August 31, 2000 and 1999 and certain balance sheet information at August 31, 2001 and 2000, which are no longer included in the accompanying financial statements. Arthur Andersen LLP has not reissued this report in connection with the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. To National Service Industries, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of the National Service Industries, Inc. lighting equipment and chemicals businesses (to be reorganized as Acuity Brands, Inc. — Note 1) as of August 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related combined statements of income, parent’s equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2001. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of the National Service Industries, Inc. lighting equipment and chemicals businesses as of August 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Atlanta, Georgia October 12, 2001 Arthur Andersen LLP 35 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except share data) ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $8,634 at August 31, 2003 and $8,560 at August 31, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepayments and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, Plant, and Equipment, at cost: Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings and leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment Total Property, Plant, and Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less-Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, Plant, and Equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Assets: Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long term assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Other Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 31, 2003 2002 $ 16,053 $ 2,694 302,276 188,799 23,047 28,377 558,552 14,060 164,974 350,549 529,583 307,025 222,558 345,676 129,843 31,590 507,109 322,735 216,942 24,247 24,379 590,997 14,746 162,296 339,198 516,240 275,561 240,679 344,218 133,030 49,030 526,278 Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,288,219 $1,357,954 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current maturities of long-term debt Short-term secured borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued salaries, commissions, and bonuses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-Term Debt, less current maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Self-Insurance Reserves, less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Long-Term Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,339 48,000 5,000 — 165,656 49,217 90,239 359,451 391,469 15,190 16,126 97,689 $ 746 129,200 — 2,545 161,713 36,459 100,144 430,807 410,630 23,480 16,517 74,568 Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 6) Stockholders’ Equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 41,674,996 and 41,379,154 shares issued and outstanding at August 31, 2003 and August 31, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unearned compensation on restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 417 407,621 44,755 (1,734) (42,765) 408,294 414 403,389 21,884 (500) (23,235) 401,952 Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,288,219 $1,357,954 The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 36 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands, except per-share data) Years Ended August 31, 2003 2002 2001 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of products sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,049,308 1,197,787 $1,972,796 1,169,282 $1,982,700 1,141,353 Gross Profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 851,521 803,514 841,347 Selling, distribution, and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating Profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 739,330 1,915 110,276 683,163 224 120,127 701,535 223 139,589 Other Expense (Income): Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring and other charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on sale of businesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Miscellaneous (income) expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Other Expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before Provision for Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37,383 — 227 (1,915) 35,695 74,581 26,799 40,690 (853) — (2,546) 37,291 82,836 30,812 48,797 4,083 14,557 3,000 70,437 69,152 28,649 Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 47,782 $ 52,024 $ 40,503 Earnings Per Share: Basic Earnings per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.15 Basic Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding . . . . 41,459 Diluted Earnings per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.15 Diluted Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding . . . 41,721 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Pro Forma Earnings Per Share (Unaudited): Basic Earnings per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding . . . . n/a n/a $ 1.26 $ 0.99 41,286 41,068 Dividends Declared per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.60 $ 0.45 n/a The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 37 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on the sale of property, plant, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on sale of businesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for losses on accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring and other charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in assets and liabilities net of effect of acquisitions and divestitures - Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepayments and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash Provided by (Used for) Investing Activities: Purchases of property, plant, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sale of businesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Cash Used for Investing Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities: Net (repayments) borrowings of notes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayments of commercial paper, net (less than 90 days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuances of commercial paper (greater than 90 days) Repayments of commercial paper (greater than 90 days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Repayments) borrowings from revolving credit facility, net . . . . . . . . . . (Repayments) proceeds from short-term secured borrowings . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from issuances of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayments of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee stock purchase plan issuances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net activity with NSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Cash Used for Financing Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Supplemental Cash Flow Information: Years Ended August 31, 2003 2002 2001 $ 47,782 $ 52,024 $ 40,503 46,039 (699) 227 4,399 — 15,935 28,043 6,108 (3,782) 3,987 2,707 9,599 160,345 (28,154) 1,907 (92) — (26,339) (2,545) — — — (35,000) (81,200) 22,202 (770) 1,666 128 (24,911) — (120,430) (217) 13,359 2,694 $ 16,053 $ 49,494 (3,214) — 5,445 (853) (31,822) 4,471 (2,920) 1,328 50,415 30,643 (8,170) 146,841 (33,482) 8,358 — (24,765) (49,889) 62,911 (194) 14,557 4,930 4,083 35,258 23,189 (4,433) (3,948) 6,951 (1,814) 1,660 183,653 (47,611) 1,837 1,632 — (44,142) (22,121) — — — (65,000) 24,100 — (2,688) 830 — (18,606) (18,632) (102,117) (147) (5,312) 8,006 2,694 4,381 (221,801) 1,370 (15,200) 105,000 105,100 — (7,601) — — — (103,386) (132,137) 173 7,547 459 8,006 $ Income taxes paid during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest paid during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25,674 37,650 $ 11,869 41,231 $ 32,659 43,416 The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 38 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In thousands, except share and per-share data) Comprehensive Income NSI Investment Common Stock Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Items Unearned Compensation On Restricted Stock Total Balance, September 1, 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 455,543 $— $ — $ — $(12,741) $ — $442,802 Comprehensive income: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . Reclassification adjustment for translation loss included in net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of tax of $1,402) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . $ 40,503 40,503 — (2,374) 503 (2,386) (4,257) — — — — — — Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 36,246 Net transactions with NSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, August 31, 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allocation of NSI Investment Comprehensive income: (95,750) — 400,296 — (400,296) 413 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of tax of $3,507) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . $ 52,024 (267) (5,970) (6,237) Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 45,787 Amortization and forfeitures of restricted stock grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee Stock Purchase Plan issuances (1) . . . . . . Cash Dividends of $0.45 per share paid on common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net transactions with NSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, August 31, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: $ 47,782 Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . Reclassification adjustment for translation loss included in net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of tax of $13,197) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . 2,757 185 (22,472) (19,530) Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 28,252 Amortization, issuance, and forfeitures of restricted stock grants (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee Stock Purchase Plan issuances (3) . . . . . . Stock issued in connection with long-term incentive plan (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends of $0.60 per share paid on common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock options exercised (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — — — — 1 — — — — — — 1 2 — — — — — — — — — 400,560 — — — — — — — — (2,374) 503 (2,386) — (16,998) — — 52,024 — — — — 829 — — — — — (18,606) (11,534) 2,000 (267) (5,970) — — — — — — — — — — (677) — — — 40,503 (2,374) 503 (2,386) (95,750) 383,298 — 52,024 (267) (5,970) 177 — — — 177 830 (18,606) (9,534) 414 403,389 21,884 (23,235) (500) 401,952 — 47,782 — 2,757 185 (22,472) — — — — 47,782 2,757 185 (22,472) — — — 2,259 1,664 181 — — — — — — — (24,911) 128 — — — — — — (1,234) — — — — 1,026 1,666 181 (24,911) 128 Balance, August 31, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $417 $407,621 $ 44,755 $(42,765) $(1,734) $408,294 (1) 67,332 shares. (2) 120,191 shares. (3) 144,280 shares. (4) 22,923 shares. (5)8,448shares. The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 39 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Note 1: Description of Business and Basis of Presentation Acuity Brands, Inc. (“Acuity Brands” or the “Company”) operates in two business segments – lighting equipment and specialty products. The lighting equipment segment produces a full range of indoor and outdoor lighting fixtures for commercial and institutional, industrial, and residential applications for markets throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, and overseas. The specialty products segment produces specialty chemical products including cleaners, deodorizers, and pesticides for industrial and institutional, commercial, and residential applications for markets throughout North America and Western Europe. Prior to November 30, 2001, Acuity Brands was a wholly-owned subsidiary of National Service Industries, Inc. (“NSI”) owning and operating the lighting equipment and specialty products businesses. Acuity Brands was spun off from NSI into a separate publicly traded company with its own management and board of directors through a tax-free distribution (“Distribution” or “Spin-off”) of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of Acuity Brands on November 30, 2001. Each NSI stockholder of record as of November 16, 2001, the record date for the Distribution, received one share of Acuity Brands common stock for each share of NSI common stock held at that date. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Acuity Brands and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. (“ABL”) and Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc. (“ASP”). For periods prior to December 1, 2001, these financial statements were derived from the historical financial statements of NSI. Acuity Brands was allocated certain corporate assets, liabilities, and expenses of NSI during the periods prior to December 1, 2001 based on an estimate of the proportion of such amounts allocable to Acuity Brands, utilizing such factors as total revenue, employee headcount, and other relevant factors. The Company believes these allocations were made on a reasonable basis. The Company believes all amounts allocated to Acuity Brands are a reasonable representation of the costs that would have been incurred if Acuity Brands had performed these functions as a stand-alone company. In conjunction with the Spin-off, Acuity Brands and NSI entered into various agreements that addressed the allocation of assets and liabilities and defined the Company’s relationship with NSI after the Distribution, including a distribution agreement, a tax disaffiliation agreement, and a transition services agreement. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the Company’s contractual relationship with NSI. Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Acuity Brands and its wholly-owned subsidiaries after elimination of significant intercompany transactions and accounts. Revenue Recognition and Product Warranty Acuity Brands records revenue as products are shipped and title passes. A provision for estimated returns, allowances, and warranty costs is recorded when products are shipped based on historical experience. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions, which include estimates of NSI costs 40 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) allocated to Acuity Brands, that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash in excess of daily requirements is invested in time deposits and marketable securities and is included in the accompanying balance sheets at fair value. Acuity Brands considers time deposits and marketable securities purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Concentrations of Credit Risk Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables, which are unsecured, are generally limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets using Acuity Brands’ products, as well as their dispersion across many different geographic areas. As of August 31, 2003, receivables from The Home Depot were approximately $40.2 million. No other single customer accounted for more than ten percent of consolidated receivables at August 31, 2003. Reclassifications Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market and consist of the following: Raw materials and supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 74,091 22,201 104,932 $ 97,036 19,884 108,659 Less: reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201,224 (12,425) 225,579 (8,637) $188,799 $216,942 August 31, 2003 2002 Goodwill and Other Intangibles In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 required companies to cease amortizing goodwill that existed at June 30, 2001 and established a new method for testing goodwill for impairment on an annual basis (or an interim basis if an event occurs that might reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value). Any goodwill resulting from acquisitions completed after June 30, 2001 will not be amortized. SFAS No. 142 also required that an identifiable intangible asset which is determined to have an indefinite useful economic life not be amortized, but be separately tested for impairment using a fair-value-based approach. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 effective September 1, 2001 resulting in a decrease in amortization expense of approximately $12.1 million during the year ended August 31, 2002 when compared to the year ended August 31, 2001. 41 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Summarized information for the Company’s acquired intangible assets is as follows: August 31, 2003 August 31, 2002 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Amortized intangible assets: Trade names and trademarks . . . . Distribution network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,030 53,000 17,080 $83,110 $ (1,782) (7,216) (9,283) $(18,281) Unamortized intangible assets: Trade names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $65,014 $ (1,347) (5,448) (8,295) $(15,090) $13,030 53,000 17,076 $83,106 $65,014 The Company amortizes trade names with definite lives, trademarks, and the distribution network over their estimated useful lives of 30 years. Other amortized intangible assets consist primarily of patented technology and restrictive covenant agreements, which are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 12 years and 3 years, respectively. The Company recorded amortization expense of $3.2 million and $4.3 million related to intangible assets with definite lives during fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively. Projected amortization expense is approximately $3.2 million in each of the next five years. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the period are summarized as follows: Balance as of August 31, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sale of business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $314,103 — 1,093 $30,115 (230) 595 $344,218 (230) 1,688 Balance as of August 31, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $315,196 $30,480 $345,676 ABL ASP Total ABL and ASP each test goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for impairment on an annual basis, as required by SFAS No. 142, using a combination of valuation techniques including the expected present value of future cash flows, a market multiple approach, and a comparable transaction approach. This analysis did not result in an impairment during fiscal 2003 or 2002. 42 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, $3,460 of goodwill associated with a 1969 acquisition was not amortized. Remaining amounts of goodwill ($327,903 at August 31, 2001) were amortized over estimated useful lives ranging from 10 years to 40 years. Had the Company accounted for goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 142 in prior periods, the Company’s net income would have been affected as follows: Year ended August 31, 2002 2001 2003 Reported net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back: Goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back: Trade name amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $47,782 — — $52,024 — — $40,503 9,891 990 Adjusted net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $47,782 $52,024 $51,384 Basic earnings per share*: Reported net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back: Goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back: Trade name amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.15 — — $ 1.26 — — $ 0.99 0.24 0.03 Adjusted net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.15 $ 1.26 $ 1.26 * Earnings per share for the years ended August 31, 2002 and 2001 are pro forma. See Note 5 for additional information. The Company is required to test its goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives for impairment on a periodic basis, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements if these assets are deemed impaired. Other Long-Term Assets Other long-term assets consisted of the following: August 31, 2003 2002 Long term investments (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid pension costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible pension asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Note receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt issue costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25,805 — 1,654 1,052 2,038 1,041 $28,677 12,693 1,580 2,165 2,385 1,530 $31,590 $49,030 (1) Long term investments - The Company maintains certain investments that generate returns that offset changes in certain liabilities related to deferred compensation arrangements. The investments primarily consist of marketable equity securities and fixed income securities, are stated at fair value, and are classified as trading in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income and generally offset the change in the deferred compensation liability. 43 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Other Long-Term Liabilities Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following: Accrued pension liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Postretirement benefits other than pensions (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director stock unit plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Postemployment benefit obligation (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40,245 54,602 1,605 430 807 $15,622 56,380 970 497 1,099 $97,689 $74,568 August 31, 2003 2002 (1) Postretirement benefits other than pensions - The Company maintains several non-qualified retirement plans for the benefit of eligible employees, primarily deferred compensation plans. The deferred compensation plans provide for elective deferrals of an eligible employee’s compensation and, in some cases, matching contributions by the Company. In addition, one plan provides for an automatic contribution by the Company of three percent of an eligible employee’s compensation. Deferred compensation associated with these plans, together with the Company’s contributions and accumulated earnings, is generally distributable in cash pursuant to the terms of the plans, either after specified periods of time or after retirement. The Company maintains life insurance policies on certain current and former officers and other key employees as a means of satisfying a portion of these obligations. (2) Postemployment benefit obligation - SFAS No. 112, Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits, requires the accrual of the estimated cost of benefits provided by an employer to former or inactive employees after employment but before retirement. Acuity Brands’ accrual relates primarily to the liability for life insurance coverage for certain eligible employees. Earnings per Share Earnings per share data for periods prior to fiscal 2003 has not been presented since the businesses that comprise Acuity Brands were wholly-owned subsidiaries of NSI, or businesses thereof, during a portion of or for all of the periods presented and were recapitalized as part of the Distribution. Pro Forma Earnings Per Share (Unaudited) Pro forma basic earnings per share is calculated as net income divided by the pro forma weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding has been computed by applying the distribution ratio of one share of Acuity Brands common stock to the historical NSI weighted average shares outstanding for the same period presented. Pro forma earnings per share information is unaudited and has been presented for the years ended August 31, 2002 and 2001 only. Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs In September 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs. EITF 00-10 requires shipping and handling fees billed to customers to be classified as 44 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) revenue and shipping and handling costs to be either classified as cost of sales or disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. The Company includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers in Net sales. Shipping and handling costs associated with inbound freight are generally recorded in Cost of products sold. Other shipping and handling costs are included in Selling, distribution, and administrative expenses and totaled $120.4 million, $114.1 million, and $114.6 million in fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. Stock-Based Compensation The Company issues stock options to employees and directors under certain of its benefit plans. Under all stock option plans, the options expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The Company accounts for the employee and director plans under the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for these stock option plans in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Acuity Brands has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure an Amendment to FASB Statement No. 123. The Company expects to begin using the fair value approach to account for stock-based compensation, in accordance with the prospective method as prescribed by SFAS No. 148, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards during fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, consistent with the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been impacted as follows: Net income, as reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Compensation expense related to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Stock-based compensation determined under fair value based Year Ended August 31, 2003 2002 (1) $47,782 $52,024 287 201 method for stock option awards, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,326 2,541 Pro forma net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $45,169 $49,282 Earnings per share: Basic earnings per share – as reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per share – pro forma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share – as reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share – pro forma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 1.15 1.09 1.15 1.08 $ $ 1.26 1.19 n/a n/a (1) Weighted average shares outstanding for the year ended August 31, 2002 has been computed by applying the distribution ratio of one share of Acuity Brands common stock to the historical NSI weighted average shares outstanding for the same period presented. The above pro-forma calculations only include the effects of options granted subsequent to the Distribution. Accordingly, the pro forma effect of applying SFAS No. 123 may not be representative of the effect on reported net income in future years because options vest over several years and varying amounts of awards are generally made each year. 45 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) The following weighted average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted in the fiscal year: Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected life of options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4% 43.8% 3.0% 4.3% 34.0% 5.2% 8 years 10 years 2003 2002 See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. Depreciation For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is determined principally on a straight-line basis using estimated useful lives of plant and equipment (20 to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 15 years for machinery and equipment) while accelerated depreciation methods are used for income tax purposes. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease or the useful life of the improvement whichever is shorter. Research and Development Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses amounted to $27.4 million, $22.0 million, and $15.6 million during fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. Advertising Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and were $16.3 million, $18.1 million, and $13.8 million during fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency for the foreign operations of Acuity Brands is the local currency. The translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted average exchange rate during the year. The gains or losses resulting from the translation are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Items in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income and are excluded from net income. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in Miscellaneous (income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income and were insignificant in fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001. Interest Expense, Net Interest expense, net, is comprised primarily of interest expense on long-term debt, revolving credit facility borrowings, and short-term secured borrowings partially offset by interest income on cash and cash equivalents. 46 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) The following table summarizes the components of interest expense, net: Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $37,804 (421) $41,196 (506) $49,421 (624) Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $37,383 $40,690 $48,797 Years Ended August 31, 2003 2002 2001 Miscellaneous (Income) Expense, Net Miscellaneous (income) expense, net, is comprised primarily of gains or losses resulting from the sale of assets and gains or losses on foreign currency transactions. Additionally, during 2001, Miscellaneous (income) expense, net, includes a charge of approximately $3.1 million related to the early termination of a purchase contract. Accounting Standards Adopted in Fiscal 2003 In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Retirement Obligations. This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. A legal obligation is an obligation that a party is required to settle as a result of an existing or enacted law, statute, ordinance, or written or oral contract or by legal construction of a contract under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. This statement amends FASB Statement No. 19, Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Acuity Brands adopted this statement effective September 1, 2002. Adoption of this statement did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of and supersedes the provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations – Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions with regard to reporting the effects of a disposal of a segment of a business. SFAS No. 144 provides a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of and significantly changes the criteria required to classify an asset as held-for-sale. Under SFAS No. 144, more dispositions will qualify for discontinued operations treatment in the income statement and expected future operating losses from discontinued operations will be displayed in discontinued operations in the period in which the losses are incurred. SFAS No. 144 is effective for all fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Acuity Brands adopted this statement effective September 1, 2002. Adoption of this statement did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). 47 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) The principal difference between SFAS No. 146 and Issue No. 94-3 relates to the requirements for recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Acuity Brands adopted SFAS No. 146 effective September 1, 2002. Adoption of this statement did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN No. 45”), Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN No. 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of the guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. This interpretation does not prescribe a specific approach for subsequently measuring the guarantor’s recognized liability over the term of the related guaranty. This interpretation also supersedes and incorporates the guidance in FASB Interpretation No. 34, Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN No. 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of FIN No. 45, including those related to product warranties, are effective for financial statements for interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. Acuity Brands adopted FIN No. 45 effective December 1, 2002. Adoption of this interpretation did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. Accounting Standards Yet to Be Adopted On December 31, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure-an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The alternative methods include the prospective method, the modified prospective method, and the retroactive restatement method. The prospective method requires application of the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 for awards granted after the beginning of the fiscal year in which the adoption is made. Acuity Brands expects to adopt the prospective method for transitioning to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation as prescribed by SFAS No. 123 during the first quarter of fiscal 2004. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure of the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements, regardless of the method used to account for stock-based employee compensation. The annual disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 are effective for all fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. The Company expects to incur incremental expense of approximately $7.2 million related to its stock-based plans in fiscal 2004, including approximately $4.3 million in connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 123 on a prospective basis. In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—An Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. FIN No. 46 requires the consolidation of entities in which an enterprise absorbs a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual interests or other financial interests in the entity. FIN No. 46 is effective for all new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN No. 46 must be 48 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) applied during the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2003. Acuity Brands will adopt FIN No. 46 effective in fiscal 2004. Adoption of this interpretation is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. Note 3: Pension and Profit Sharing Plans Acuity Brands has several pension plans covering certain hourly and salaried employees. Benefits paid under these plans are based generally on employees’ years of service and/or compensation during the final years of employment. Acuity Brands makes annual contributions to the plans to the extent indicated by actuarial valuations. Plan assets are invested primarily in equity and fixed income securities. The following tables reflect the status of Acuity Brands’ domestic (U.S. based) and international pension plans at August 31, 2003 and 2002: Domestic Plans August 31, International Plans August 31, 2003 2002 2003 2002 Change in Benefit Obligation: Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plan amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Curtailment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 76,041 2,729 5,532 (506) — 19,412 (4,220) (444) $ 71,726 2,778 5,383 46 — 454 (4,346) — $18,623 928 1,196 — — 905 (270) 291 $15,496 659 1,151 — (952) 2,518 (1,565) 1,316 Benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 98,544 $ 76,041 $21,673 $18,623 Change in Plan Assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 67,447 (88) 1,591 — (4,220) — $ 69,248 (1,200) 3,745 — (4,346) — $11,715 (358) 629 286 (259) 201 $14,241 (2,678) 1,083 226 (1,565) 408 Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 64,730 $ 67,447 $12,214 $11,715 Funded Status: Funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized transition asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net amount recognized at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Consist of: $(33,814) $ (8,594) $ (9,459) $ (6,908) 9,213 — — 41,107 (370) 1,295 $ 8,218 16,555 (503) 2,153 $ 9,611 11,584 — — $ 2,125 $ 2,305 Prepaid benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued benefit liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net amount recognized at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ 12,693 (11,161) 1,580 6,499 $ 9,611 (33,503) 1,654 40,067 $ 8,218 $ — $ — (6,742) — 8,867 $ 2,125 (4,461) — 6,766 $ 2,305 49 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for domestic defined benefit pension plans with both projected and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $98.5 million, $98.2 million, and $64.7 million, respectively, as of August 31, 2003, and $33.0 million, $32.7 million, and $22.4 million, respectively, as of August 31, 2002. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for international defined benefit pension plans with both projected and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $21.7 million, $19.1 million, and $12.2 million, respectively, as of August 31, 2003, and $18.6 million, $16.1 million, and $11.7 million, respectively, as of August 31, 2002. Components of net periodic pension cost for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 included the following: Domestic Plans International Plans 2003 2002 2001 2003 2002 2001 Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,729 $ 2,778 $ 1,933 $ 928 $ Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of transitional asset . . . . . . . . . . Recognized actuarial loss (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . 1,196 5,156 (964) (6,745) 418 — (140) — (16) 5,383 (6,390) 434 (126) 207 5,532 (6,261) 385 (133) 764 (257) 659 1,151 (1,210) — — (2) 620 1,114 (1,293) — — (2) Net periodic pension cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,016 $ 2,286 $ 606 $ 903 $ 598 $ 439 Weighted average assumptions in fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001 included the following: Domestic Plans International Plans 2003 2002 2001 2003 2002 2001 Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.0% 7.5% 7.8% 5.5% 6.0% 7.4% 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% 7.0% 8.0% 8.5% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 4.3% 4.3% 4.9% It is Acuity Brands’ policy to adjust, on an annual basis, the discount rate used to determine the projected benefit obligation to approximate rates on high-quality, long-term obligations. The Company estimates that each 100 basis point reduction in the discount rate would result in additional net domestic periodic pension cost, the Company’s primary pension obligations, of approximately $1.4 million. The expected return on plan assets is derived from a periodic study of long-term historical rates of return on the various asset classes included in the Company’s targeted pension plan asset allocation. As a result of this study during 2003, the expected return on plan assets for the Company’s domestic plans will decrease by 100 basis points to 8.5 percent in 2004. The Company estimates that each 100 basis point reduction in the expected return on plan assets would result in additional net domestic periodic pension cost of $0.6 million. The rate of compensation increase is also evaluated and is adjusted by the Company, if necessary, annually. 50 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Acuity Brands’ pension plan asset allocation at August 31, 2003 and 2002 by asset category is as follows: % of Plan Assets Domestic Plans 2002 2003 International Plans 2003 2002 Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59.0% 50.0% 79.6% 78.8% 33.0% 40.0% 13.5% 15.2% 3.2% 5.0% 2.8% 3.0% 3.3% 3.6% 5.0% 5.0% Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Acuity Brands also has defined contribution plans to which both employees and the Company make contributions. The cost to Acuity Brands for these plans was $5.5 million in 2003, $5.0 million in 2002, and $4.3 million in 2001. Effective February 2002, participants in all of the Company’s defined contribution plans were permitted to direct the investments of all funds in their respective plan, thereby eliminating the nonparticipant- directed funds. Employer matching amounts are allocated in accordance with the participants’ investment elections for elective deferrals. At August 31, 2003, assets of the defined contribution plans included shares of the Company’s common stock with a market value of approximately $9.6 million, which represented approximately three percent of the total fair market value of the assets in the Company’s defined contribution plans. Note 4: Long-Term Debt and Lines of Credit Long-term debt at August 31, 2003 and 2002, consisted of the following: 3-Year Revolving Credit Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6% notes due February 2009 with an effective interest rate of 6.04%, net of unamortized discount of $226 in 2003 and $268 in 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.375% notes due August 2010 with an effective interest rate of 8.398%, net of unamortized discount of $170 in 2003 and $195 in 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other notes, payable in installments to 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less — Amounts payable within one year included in current liabilities . . . . 2003 2002 $ — $ 40,000 159,774 159,732 199,830 33,204 392,808 1,339 199,805 11,839 411,376 746 $391,469 $410,630 Future annual principal payments of long-term debt are as follows: Fiscal Year 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amount $ 1,339 1,528 18,460 485 242 370,754 $392,808 51 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) In May 2001, NSI entered into a three-year agreement (“Receivables Facility”) to borrow, on an ongoing basis, up to $150.0 million secured by undivided interests in a defined pool of trade accounts receivable of the lighting equipment and specialty products businesses. Borrowings under the Receivables Facility are subject to the annual renewal of a supporting line of credit. Effective November 30, 2001, Acuity Brands assumed all of the outstanding borrowings and other obligations under the Receivables Facility. Net trade accounts receivable pledged as security for borrowings under the Receivables Facility totaled $265.9 million at August 31, 2003. Borrowings at August 31, 2003 and 2002 under the Receivables Facility totaled $48.0 million and $129.2 million, respectively. Interest rates under the Receivables Facility vary with commercial paper rates plus an applicable margin. The interest rate, including the commitment and usage fee was approximately 1.95 percent and 2.18 percent at August 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. During fiscal 2002, the Company entered into financing agreements (“Revolving Credit Facility”) with a group of domestic and international banks that had two components allowing for borrowings of up to $210.0 million. The first component was a $105.0 million, 364-day committed credit facility that was scheduled to mature in April 2003. The second component was a three-year credit facility that allowed for borrowings up to $105.0 million and was scheduled to mature in April 2005. The Revolving Credit Facility contained financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expense), subject to certain adjustments, and a minimum interest coverage ratio. In April 2003, the Company modified certain terms and conditions of its Revolving Credit Facility primarily to extend the 364-day component of the credit facility and to incorporate changes to the Maximum Leverage Ratio, the ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation expense, and amortization expense) as such terms are defined in the Revolving Credit Facility. The Maximum Leverage Ratio, currently at 3.50, decreases to 3.25 at November 30, 2003, and then to 3.00 at May 31, 2004. The Leverage Ratio is computed at the end of each fiscal quarter. In addition, maximum available borrowings under the 364-day component of the Revolving Credit Facility, which now matures in April 2004, decreased to $92.5 million from $105.0 million. No changes were made to the maximum available borrowings or the maturity date of the three- year component of the credit facility. At August 31, 2003, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants in the Revolving Credit Facility. At August 31, 2003, the Company had $5.0 million in outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and had additional borrowing capacity of $112.8 million under the Revolving Credit Facility under the most restrictive covenant in effect at that time. The Company’s Receivable Facility and Revolving Credit Facility each contain “Material Adverse Effect” provisions. Generally, if the Company were to experience an event causing a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, operations, or properties, as defined in the agreements, additional future borrowings under either facility may be denied. None of the Company’s existing debt instruments include provisions that would require an acceleration of repayments based solely on changes in the Company’s credit ratings. In October 2002, Acuity Brands entered into a new loan agreement (“Term Loan”), secured by certain land and buildings of the Company. Proceeds from the Term Loan were used to reduce borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and to provide the Company additional liquidity. In April 2003, the financial covenants included in the Term Loan were modified to be consistent with the new financial covenants contained in the Revolving Credit Facility noted above. Interest rates under the Term Loan are based on one-month LIBOR plus a margin. Outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan were $19.5 million at August 31, 2003. The interest rate was approximately 2.6 percent at August 31, 2003. During fiscal 2003, the Company replaced approximately $2.5 million of borrowings outstanding on an uncommitted revolving foreign credit line with a five-year note. The note is denominated in Euros and bears 52 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) interest at a variable rate, 3.2 percent at August 31, 2003. Principal payments are made in equal semi-annual installments. In addition, Acuity Brands also had uncommitted foreign bank lines of credit totaling $2.0 million at August 31, 2003. There were no outstanding borrowings under the foreign bank lines at August 31, 2003. At August 31, 2003, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $30.1 million primarily for the purpose of securing collateral requirements under the casualty insurance programs for both Acuity Brands and NSI and for providing credit support for the Company’s industrial revenue bonds. A total of $18.4 million of the letters of credit were issued under the three-year component of the Revolving Credit Facility thereby reducing the total availability under the line by such amount. In January 1999, NSI issued $160.0 million in ten-year publicly traded notes bearing a coupon rate of 6.0 percent. In August 2000, NSI issued $200.0 million in ten-year publicly traded notes bearing a coupon rate of 8.375 percent. Pursuant to a supplemental indenture executed in contemplation of the Distribution, Acuity Brands and its principal operating subsidiaries have become the obligors of the notes, and NSI, effective as of the Distribution, was relieved of all obligations with respect to the notes. Because the $160.0 million and the $200.0 million notes trade infrequently, it is difficult to obtain an accurate fair market value of the notes. However, based on a comparison of notes of similar size, ratings, and tenor, the fair values of the $160.0 million and $200.0 million notes are believed to approximate $163.4 million and $228.5 million, respectively. Excluding the $160.0 million and $200.0 million notes, long-term debt recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value based on similar instruments with similar terms and average maturities. Note 5: Common Stock and Related Matters Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement Prior to the Spin-off, the Company’s board of directors adopted a Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”). The Rights Agreement contains provisions that are intended to protect the Company’s stockholders in the event of an unsolicited offer to acquire the Company, including offers that do not treat all stockholders equally and other coercive, unfair, or inadequate takeover bids and practices that could impair the ability of the Company’s board of directors to fully represent stockholders’ interests. Pursuant to the Rights Agreement, the Company’s board of directors declared a dividend of one “Right” for each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock as of November 16, 2001. The Rights will be represented by, and trade together with, the Company’s common stock until and unless certain events occur, including the acquisition of 15% or more of the Company’s common stock by a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (with certain exceptions, “Acquiring Persons”). Unless previously redeemed by the Company’s board of directors, upon the occurrence of one of the specified triggering events, each Right that is not held by an Acquiring Person will entitle its holder to purchase one share of common stock or, under certain circumstances, additional shares of common stock at a discounted price. The Rights will cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire the Company on terms not approved by the Company’s board of directors. Thus, the Rights are intended to encourage persons who may seek to acquire control of the Company to initiate such an acquisition through negotiation with the board of directors. Preferred Stock The Company has 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, 5,000,000 of which have been reserved for issuance under the Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement. No shares of preferred stock had been issued at August 31, 2003 and 2002. 53 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Earnings per Share The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Under this statement, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similarly but reflects the potential dilution that would occur if dilutive options were exercised and restricted stock awards were vested. Pro forma basic earnings per share is calculated as net income divided by the pro forma weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding has been computed by applying the Distribution ratio of one share of Acuity Brands common stock to the historical NSI weighted average shares outstanding for the same period presented. Public trading of Acuity Brands stock did not commence until December 3, 2001; therefore, no historical market share prices exist for the calculation of the potential dilutive effect of stock options for periods prior to the second quarter of fiscal 2002. As a result, pro forma diluted earnings per share are not presented for the years ended August 31, 2002 and 2001. The following table calculates basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share for the year ended August 31, 2003 and pro forma basic earnings per common share for the years ended August 31, 2002 and 2001: Years Ended August 31, 2003 2002 PRO FORMA 2001 PRO FORMA Basic earnings per share: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding . . . . . . . $47,782 41,459 $52,024 41,286 $40,503 41,068 Basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.15 $ 1.26 $ 0.99 Diluted earnings per share: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $47,782 Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding . . . . . . . Add – Shares of common stock issuable upon assumed exercise of diluted options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add – Unvested restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,459 134 128 Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding . . . . . 41,721 Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.15 Stock-Based Compensation Pursuant to the employee benefits agreement, NSI stock options held by employees of Acuity Brands were converted to, and replaced by, Acuity Brands stock options at the time of the Distribution. Acuity Brands multiplied the number of shares purchasable under each converted stock option by a ratio determined at the time of the Distribution, based on the respective trading prices of NSI and Acuity Brands shares, and divided the exercise price per share of each option by the same ratio. Fractional shares were rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares. All other terms of the converted stock options remain the same as those in effect immediately prior to the Distribution. Accordingly, no compensation expense resulted from the replacement of the options. 54 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Effective November 30, 2001, Acuity Brands adopted the Acuity Brands, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of officers and other key management personnel (“Participants”). An aggregate of 8.1 million shares are authorized for issuance under the Plan. Stock options generally become exercisable over a three or four-year period from the date of grant. The Plan also provides for the issuance of performance-based and restricted stock awards. In December 2002, the Company reserved approximately 490,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock for issuance to officers and other key employees under the Plan. The shares are granted in 25 percent increments upon the achievement of at least two of three progressive defined performance measures and the completion of related target years (as defined in the agreement). The performance measures relate to specified levels of debt reduction, cumulative earnings per share measured at each fiscal quarter-end for the trailing four quarters, and stock price targets. The shares vest at the later of (a) determination by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors that at least two of the three performance measures are achieved or (b) November 30 of the specified target year. Two-thirds of the value of the restricted shares at the vesting date is paid to the participants in unrestricted shares of the Company and the remainder is paid in cash. Participants may elect to defer payments under this performance-based restricted stock plan into a separate deferred compensation plan. In the event payments are deferred into the deferred compensation plan, the value of the restricted shares would be converted to share units that ultimately would be paid in cash. As of August 31, 2003, approximately 120,000 shares had been issued under this plan. Compensation expense recognized related to this plan was $1.6 million in fiscal 2003. In October 2000, the Company reserved approximately 240,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock for issuance to officers and other key employees under the Plan. Under this award, restricted shares are granted in 20 percent increments when the Company’s stock price equals or exceeds certain stock price targets for thirty consecutive calendar days (the vesting start date) and vest ratably in four equal annual installments beginning one year from the vesting start date. At the time of the Distribution and in accordance with the employee benefits agreement, each employee of Acuity Brands holding outstanding shares of NSI restricted stock received a dividend of one Acuity Brands restricted share for each NSI restricted share held. Acuity Brands restricted shares received as a dividend on NSI restricted stock are subject to the same restrictions and terms, including vesting provisions, of the NSI restricted stock. Restricted share awards that had not reached a vesting start date, and their related stock price targets, were converted to Acuity Brands restricted share awards in the same manner as stock options. Shares that have not reached a vesting start date expire five years from the date of the grant. All other terms of the converted grants remain the same as those in effect immediately prior to the Distribution. As of August 31, 2003, approximately 50,000 shares had been issued under this plan. Compensation expense recognized related to this plan was $0.3 million, $0.2 million, and $0.2 million in fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. In November 2001, the Acuity Brands adopted the Acuity Brands, Inc. 2001 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, under which 300,000 shares are authorized for issuance. The stock options granted under this plan become exercisable one year from the date of grant. As of August 31, approximately 60,000 shares had been issued under this plan. Under all stock option plans, the options generally expire 10 years from the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Shares available for grant under all plans were approximately 710,000 and 1,060,000 at August 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. 55 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Stock option transactions for the stock option plans and stock option agreements during the years ended August 31, 2002 and 2003 were as follows: Outstanding Exercisable Number of Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Number of Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Outstanding at August 31, 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — NSI options converted at the Spin-off . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,278,325 3,004,051 (1,053) (200,025) Outstanding at August 31, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,081,298 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132,500 (8,448) (265,211) Outstanding at August 31, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,940,139 Range of option exercise prices: $10.00 - $15.00 (average life – 8.3 years) . . . . . . $15.01 - $20.00 (average life – 7.2 years) . . . . . . $20.01 - $25.00 (average life – 5.3 years) . . . . . . $25.01 - $30.00 (average life – 3.7 years) . . . . . . $30.01 - $40.00 (average life – 3.7 years) . . . . . . 2,962,575 1,723,954 958,566 809,585 485,459 — $22.97 $13.84 $16.50 $16.38 $19.15 $14.26 $13.80 $20.68 $19.08 $13.82 $16.60 $23.37 $28.61 $35.67 — — 2,712,343 $25.25 4,179,243 $21.78 1,072,619 977,925 839,217 804,023 485,459 $13.83 $16.64 $23.33 $28.61 $35.67 Employee Stock Purchase Plan In November 2001, Acuity Brands adopted the Acuity Brands, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the benefit of eligible employees. Under the plan, employees may purchase, the Company’s common stock at a 15 percent discount. Shares are purchased quarterly at 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the first business day of the quarterly plan period or the last business day of the quarterly plan period. There were 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for purchase under the plan, of which approximately 1,290,000 shares remain available for purchase under the plan. Employees may participate at their discretion. through payroll deduction, Note 6: Commitments and Contingencies Self-Insurance It is the current policy of Acuity Brands to self insure, up to certain limits, for certain insurable risks consisting primarily of physical loss to property; business interruptions resulting from such loss; and workers’ compensation, comprehensive general, and auto liability. Insurance coverage is obtained for catastrophic property and casualty exposures as well as those risks required to be insured by law or contract. Based on an independent actuary’s estimate of the aggregate liability for claims incurred, a provision for claims under the self-insured program is recorded and revised annually. The Company is also self-insured for the majority of its medical benefits plans. The Company estimates its aggregate liability for claims incurred by applying a lag factor to the Company’s historical claims and administrative cost experience. The appropriateness of the Company’s lag factor is evaluated and revised annually, if necessary. 56 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Leases Acuity Brands leases certain of its buildings and equipment under noncancelable lease agreements. Minimum lease payments under noncancelable leases for years subsequent to August 31, 2003, are as follows: 2004 — $17.0 million; 2005 — $14.4 million; 2006 — $9.9 million; 2007 — $7.5 million; 2008 — $5.9 million; after 2008 — $34.8 million. Total rent expense was $23.4 million in 2003, $17.8 million in 2002, and $12.3 million in 2001. Collective Bargaining Agreements Approximately 34 percent of the Company’s total work force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. Collective bargaining agreements representing approximately 24 percent of the Company’s work force will expire within one year. Litigation Acuity Brands is subject to various legal claims arising in the normal course of business, including patent infringement and product liability claims. Based on information currently available, and except as described below, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of pending and threatened legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Acuity Brands. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of such matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of Acuity Brands in future periods. Acuity Brands establishes reserves for legal claims when the costs associated with the claims become probable and can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be substantially higher than the amounts reserved for such claims. Environmental Matters The operations of the Company are subject to comprehensive laws and regulations relating to the generation, storage, handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous substances and solid and hazardous wastes and to the remediation of contaminated sites. Permits and environmental controls are required for certain of the Company’s operations to limit air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal, and revocation by issuing authorities. Acuity Brands believes that it is in substantial compliance with all material environmental laws, regulations, and permits. On an ongoing basis, Acuity Brands incurs capital and operating costs relating to environmental compliance. Environmental laws and regulations have generally become stricter in recent years, and the cost of responding to future changes may be substantial. Acuity Brands establishes reserves for known environmental claims when the costs associated with the claims become probable and can be reasonably estimated. The actual cost of environmental issues may be higher than that reserved due to difficulty in estimating such costs and potential changes in the status of government regulations. Certain environmental laws can impose liability regardless of fault. The federal Superfund law is an example of such an environmental law. However, management believes that the Company’s potential liability under Superfund is mitigated by the presence of other parties who will share in the costs associated with the clean up of sites. The extent of liability is determined on a case-by-case basis taking into account many factors, including the number of other parties whose status or activities also subjects them to liability regardless of fault. Acuity Brands is currently a party to, or otherwise involved in, legal proceedings in connection with state and federal Superfund sites. Based on information currently available, the Company believes its liability is 57 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) immaterial at each of the currently active sites which it does not own where it has been named as a responsible party or a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) due to its limited involvement at the site and/or the number of viable PRPs. For example, the preliminary allocation among 48 PRPs at the Crymes Landfill site in Georgia indicates that Acuity Brands’ liability is not significant, and there are more than 1,000 PRPs at the M&J Solvents site in Georgia. For property that Acuity Brands owns on Seaboard Industrial Boulevard in Atlanta, Georgia, the Company has conducted an investigation on its property and adjoining properties and submitted a Compliance Status Report (“CSR”) and a proposed Corrective Action Plan (“CAP”) to the State of Georgia Environmental Protection Division (“EPD”) pursuant to the Georgia Hazardous Site Response Act. Until the EPD approves the CSR and CAP, Acuity Brands will not be able to determine whether corrective action will be required and what the costs of such action will be. In August 2003, ASP received a grand jury subpoena from the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia concerning the operation of ASP’s wastewater pretreatment plant and ASP’s management of hazardous waste at a facility in Atlanta, Georgia. The grand jury investigation appears to relate to the discharge of wastewater from the facility to the City of Atlanta’s sanitary sewer system and ASP’s practices in connection with the sampling of the facility’s wastewater discharges for permitting purposes. ASP is cooperating with the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and is in the process of completing the collection of the required documents. The U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation follows an inquiry by the City of Atlanta, which regulates the wastewater discharge at the facility. The Company has tentatively settled the matter with the City of Atlanta. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company recorded an aggregate charge of approximately $2.7 million to cover various costs including off-site disposal, the estimated costs of resolution of these proceedings with the City of Atlanta and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the estimated legal expenses to be incurred by the Company in these matters. The proceedings with the U.S. Attorney are at a preliminary stage, and developments in the investigation and the terms of any final settlement or adjudication of these matters could cause the Company to record additional charges in future periods. Guarantees and Indemnities The Company is a party to contracts entered into in the normal course of business in which it is common for the Company to agree to indemnify third parties for certain liabilities that may arise out of or relate to the subject matter of the contract. In some cases, the Company cannot estimate the potential amount of future payments under these indemnities until events arise that would result in a liability under the indemnities. In connection with the sale of assets and the divestiture of businesses, the Company from time to time agrees to indemnify the purchaser from liabilities relating to events occurring prior to the sale and conditions existing at the time of the sale. These indemnities generally include potential environmental liabilities, general representations and warranties concerning the asset or business, and certain other liabilities not assumed by the purchaser. Indemnities associated with the divestiture of businesses are generally limited in amount to the sales price of the specific business or are based on a negotiated amount and expire at various times, depending on the nature of the indemnified matter, but in some cases do not expire until the applicable statute of limitations expires. The Company does not believe that any amounts that it may be required to pay under these indemnities will be material to the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. Additionally, in conjunction with the separation of their businesses, Acuity Brands and NSI entered into various agreements that addressed the allocation of assets and liabilities and defined the Company’s relationship with NSI after the Distribution, including a distribution agreement, a transition services agreement, and a tax 58 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) disaffiliation agreement. The Company has previously accrued for those liabilities existing at the time of the Distribution that were considered probable and reasonably estimable. The Company has not accrued any additional amounts as a result of the following indemnities: Distribution Agreement- The distribution agreement provides that Acuity Brands will indemnify NSI for pre-Distribution liabilities related to the businesses that comprise Acuity Brands and previously owned businesses in the lighting equipment and specialty products segments. This indemnity does not expire and there is no stated maximum potential liability. To satisfy its obligations under the distribution agreement with respect to the lighting equipment and specialty products segments, Acuity Brands provides letters of credit on behalf of NSI for collateral requirements under NSI’s casualty programs for incurred and projected losses resulting from those segments prior to the Distribution which are covered by NSI casualty programs. This collateral is $2.4 million for fiscal year 2004, down from $5.2 million for fiscal year 2003. Transition Services Agreement- In addition to other services described in the agreement (all of which are complete), the transition services agreement provides that Acuity Brands will, for a fee, provide letters of credit to secure NSI’s obligations under various casualty insurance programs of NSI not to exceed the following amounts: Period Beginning Ending Letters of Credit November 1, 2002 November 1, 2003 November 1, 2004 October 31, 2003 October 31, 2004 October 31, 2005 $ 8.0 million $ 5.0 million $ 2.0 million Under this provision, at August 31, 2003, Acuity Brands had approximately $7.8 million of outstanding standby letters of credit that were issued for the benefit of NSI. In the event NSI is unable to fulfill its obligations under certain of its casualty insurance programs, the standby letters of credit could be drawn upon and Acuity Brands would be required to fund the drawn amount. In such event, NSI would be obligated to reimburse Acuity Brands for such amounts. The management of Acuity Brands currently believes it is unlikely that these letters of credit will be drawn upon. Tax Disaffiliation Agreement- The tax disaffiliation agreement provides that Acuity Brands will indemnify NSI for certain taxes and liabilities that may arise related to the Distribution and, generally, for deficiencies, if any, with respect to federal, state, local, or foreign taxes of NSI for periods before the Distribution. Liabilities determined under the tax disaffiliation agreement terminate upon the expiration of the applicable statute of limitation for such liability. There is no stated maximum potential liability included in the tax disaffiliation agreement. The Company does not believe that any amounts that it may be required to pay under these indemnities will be material to the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. The Company cannot estimate the potential amount of future payments under these indemnities until events arise that would result in a liability under the indemnities. 59 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Product Warranty Acuity Brands records an allowance for the estimated amount of future warranty claims when the related revenue is recognized, primarily based on historical experience. Although historical warranty costs have been within expectations, there can be no assurance that future warranty costs will not exceed historical amounts. If actual future warranty costs exceed historical amounts, additional allowances may be required, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operating results in future periods. The changes in product warranty reserve during the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 are summarized as follows: Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warranty expense during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments made during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warranty liability recorded in an acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,879 1,809 (4,399) — $ 1,823 3,003 (4,156) 6,209 $ 1,164 1,806 (1,147) — Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,289 $ 6,879 $ 1,823 2003 2002 2001 Risks Relating to the Distribution Prior to November 30, 2001, Acuity Brands was a wholly-owned subsidiary of National Service Industries, Inc. (“NSI”) owning and operating the lighting equipment and specialty products businesses. Acuity Brands was spun off from NSI into a separate publicly traded company with its own management and board of directors through a tax-free distribution (“Distribution” or “Spin-off”) of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of Acuity Brands on November 30, 2001. Each NSI stockholder of record as of November 16, 2001, the record date for the Distribution, received one share of Acuity Brands common stock for each share of NSI common stock held at that date. The following risks associated with Acuity Brands relate principally to the Distribution. If any of these risks develops into an actual event, the business, financial condition or results of operations of Acuity Brands could be materially adversely affected. Creditors of NSI May Challenge the Distribution as a Fraudulent Conveyance On November 7, 2001, the NSI board of directors made a determination, based on information provided by management and financial experts, that the Distribution was permissible under applicable dividend and solvency laws. There is no certainty, however, that a court would find the decision of the NSI board to be binding on creditors of NSI and Acuity Brands or that a court would reach the same conclusions as the NSI board in determining whether NSI or Acuity Brands was insolvent at the time of, or after giving effect to, the Distribution. If a court in a lawsuit by an unpaid creditor or representative of creditors, such as a trustee in bankruptcy, were to find that at the time NSI effected the Distribution, NSI or Acuity Brands (1) was insolvent; (2) was rendered insolvent by reason of the Distribution; (3) was engaged in a business or transaction for which their respective remaining assets constituted unreasonably small capital; or (4) intended to incur, or believed it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay as such debts matured, such court may be asked to void the Distribution (in whole or in part) as a fraudulent conveyance and require that the stockholders return the Acuity Brands shares (in whole or in part) to NSI or require Acuity Brands to fund certain liabilities for the benefit of creditors. The measure of 60 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) insolvency for purposes of the foregoing would vary depending upon the jurisdiction whose law is being applied. Generally, however, NSI or Acuity Brands would be considered insolvent if the fair value of their respective assets was less than the amount of their respective liabilities or if they incurred debt beyond their ability to repay such debt as it matures. As noted above, the NSI board of directors determined that the Distribution was permissible under applicable dividend and solvency laws. This conclusion was based on numerous factors including, but not limited to, the allocation of assets and liabilities contemplated by the Spin-off. The allocation of assets and liabilities associated with the Distribution left NSI appropriately capitalized with approximately $5.0 million in debt. In addition, certain assets with substantial market value, such as the real property related to NSI’s corporate headquarters, remained with NSI. Accordingly, management believes the likelihood that creditors of NSI could successfully challenge the Distribution is remote. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, a third party acquired NSI through a merger approved by NSI shareholders. Management believes that this transaction is strong confirmation that NSI was solvent at the time of the Distribution and remained solvent when it was acquired by the third party. The acquirer invested equity as well as funds borrowed from secured lenders. The willingness of the acquirer to invest funds, as well as the willingness of the lenders to loan funds to acquire NSI, represents an independent market assessment of NSI’s continuing solvency which the Company believes further diminishes the likelihood that creditors of NSI could successfully challenge the Distribution. Failure to Qualify as a Tax-Free Transaction Could Result in Substantial Liability NSI and Acuity Brands intend for the Distribution to be tax-free for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, and management of Acuity Brands believes the Distribution was tax-free for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. The Distribution was conditioned upon the receipt by each of NSI and Acuity Brands of opinions from each of King & Spalding, counsel to NSI and Acuity Brands, and Ernst & Young LLP, special tax advisor to NSI and Acuity Brands, that for U.S. Federal income tax purposes the receipt of Acuity Brands shares by NSI stockholders was tax-free. Neither NSI nor Acuity Brands requested an advance ruling from the Internal Revenue Service as to the tax consequences of the Distribution. The opinions of King & Spalding and Ernst & Young LLP are subject to certain assumptions and the accuracy and completeness of certain factual representations and statements made by NSI and Acuity Brands and certain other data, documentation and other materials that each of King & Spalding and Ernst & Young LLP deemed necessary for purposes of their respective opinions. If these assumptions and factual representations were incorrect or incomplete in a material respect, the conclusions set forth in the opinions may not be correct. These opinions represent the views of King & Spalding and Ernst & Young LLP as to the interpretation of existing tax law and accordingly, such opinions are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or the courts and no assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service or the courts will agree with their opinions. If the Distribution does not qualify for tax-free treatment, a substantial corporate tax would be payable by the consolidated group of which NSI is the common parent measured by the difference between (1) the aggregate fair market value of the Acuity Brands shares on the Distribution Date and (2) NSI’s adjusted tax basis in the Acuity Brands shares on the Distribution Date. The corporate level tax would be payable by NSI. However, Acuity Brands agreed under certain circumstances to indemnify NSI for all or a portion of this tax liability. This indemnification obligation, if triggered, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial position of Acuity Brands. In addition, under the applicable treasury regulations, each member of NSI’s consolidated group (including Acuity Brands) is severally liable for such tax liability. 61 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Furthermore, if the Distribution does not qualify as tax-free, each NSI stockholder who received Acuity Brands shares in the Distribution would be taxed as if he had received a cash dividend equal to the fair market value of his Acuity Brands shares on the Distribution Date. Even if the Distribution qualifies as tax-free, NSI could nevertheless incur a substantial corporate tax liability under Section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code” or the “Code”), if NSI or Acuity Brands were to undergo a change in control (whether by acquisition, additional share issuance or otherwise) pursuant to a plan or series of related transactions which include the Distribution. Any transaction, which occurs within the four-year period beginning two years prior to the Distribution, is presumed to be part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the Distribution unless NSI establishes otherwise. Under certain circumstances, Acuity Brands would be obligated to indemnify NSI for all or a portion of this substantial corporate tax liability under the tax disaffiliation agreement. This indemnification obligation would have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial position of Acuity Brands. As required under the tax disaffiliation agreement, King & Spalding issued an opinion to NSI to the effect that the third party acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of NSI through a merger and the transactions contemplated therein will not cause Section 355(e) or 355(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to apply to NSI’s spin-off of Acuity Brands. Note 7: Acquisition and Dispositions In October 2001, Acuity Brands acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the American Electric Lighting® and Dark-to-Light® product lines of the Thomas & Betts Corporation. The allocation of purchase price resulted in goodwill of approximately $9.3 million. Additionally, the Company recorded $2.5 million related to the trade names American Electric Lighting® and Dark-to-Light®. The Company will not amortize these trade names, as the Company believes the useful lives are indefinite. The Company believes that the acquisition provides the lighting equipment segment with greater presence in the utility and transportation infrastructure markets and adds breadth to the current utility offerings in high-end decorative street and area lighting. The allocation of the purchase price was as follows: Current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant, and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11,601 8,493 2,451 9,263 (7,043) $24,765 During fiscal 2001, as part of an initiative to refocus the overseas operations of the specialty products segment, Acuity Brands sold its Australian subsidiary resulting in a pre-tax loss of $5.6 million. In addition, Acuity Brands sold its French operations, as well as certain trademarks and formulas for a pre-tax loss of $9.0 million. The combined pre-tax loss of $14.6 million is included in Loss on sale of businesses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Note 8: Restructuring Expense and Other Charges During fiscal 2002, management realized lower than anticipated costs associated with severance charges in the lighting equipment segment. Accordingly, the related reserve was reversed and $0.9 million in income was recorded and is included in Restructuring and other charges in the Consolidated Statements of Income. 62 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) During fiscal 2001, the lighting equipment segment incurred severance charges of $1.6 million for the termination of 116 manufacturing and salaried employees, all of whom were terminated prior to the end of the fiscal year. Additionally, the specialty products segment recorded $0.7 million of severance costs related to the termination of 18 manufacturing and salaried employees, all of whom were terminated prior to the end of the fiscal year. Unrelated to the severance charges, the lighting equipment and specialty products segments disposed of certain fixed assets, resulting in losses of $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The resulting losses were included in the Consolidated Statements of Income under the caption Restructuring and other charges. Note 9: Income Taxes Prior to the Distribution, Acuity Brands was included in the consolidated federal income tax return of NSI. The Company’s provision for income taxes in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income, prior to the Distribution, reflects Federal, state, and foreign income taxes calculated using the separate return basis. Acuity Brands accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability approach as prescribed by SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This approach requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and the tax basis of an asset or liability. The provision for income taxes consists of the following components: Years Ended August 31, 2003 2002 2001 Provision for current federal taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for current state taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for current foreign taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for deferred taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $16,168 1,097 6,623 2,911 $23,509 2,225 4,189 889 $29,171 1,744 5,058 (7,324) Total provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $26,799 $30,812 $28,649 A reconciliation from the federal statutory rate to the total provision for income taxes is as follows: Federal income tax computed at statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State income tax, net of federal income tax Benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign and other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $26,103 891 (195) $28,993 1,657 162 $24,203 1,342 3,104 Total provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $26,799 $30,812 $28,649 Years Ended August 31, 2003 2002 2001 63 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Components of the net deferred income tax asset at August 31, 2003 and 2002 include: August 31, 2003 2002 Deferred Income Tax Liabilities: Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,054 52,041 183 $ 1,745 47,900 718 Total deferred income tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54,278 50,363 Deferred Income Tax Assets: Self-insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bonuses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign tax losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accruals not yet deductible . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8,953) (15,112) (23,578) (969) (605) (11,898) (1,020) (9,991) (4,060) (25,245) — (959) (10,025) (850) Total deferred income tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (62,135) (51,130) Net deferred income tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (7,857) $ (767) At August 31, 2003, Acuity Brands had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $1.8 million that can be carried forward indefinitely. Note 10: Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) Net Sales Gross Profit Income Before Taxes Net Income Basic Earnings Per Share Pro Forma Basic Earnings Per Share* Diluted Earnings Per Share 2003 1st Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2nd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3rd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4th Quarter 2002 1st Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2nd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3rd Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4th Quarter $505,226 489,387 521,041 533,654 $206,960 195,333 218,624 230,604 $16,390 12,002 23,941 22,248 $10,490 7,681 15,322 14,289 $481,691 468,245 507,576 515,284 $196,510 189,982 208,392 208,630 $18,600 17,033 23,506 23,697 $11,534 10,558 14,571 15,361 $0.25 0.19 0.37 0.34 n/a $0.26 0.35 0.37 n/a n/a n/a n/a $0.28 n/a n/a n/a $0.25 0.19 0.37 0.34 n/a $0.26 0.35 0.37 * Earnings per share for the periods prior to second quarter fiscal 2002 are pro forma. See Note 5 for additional information. 64 ACUITY BRANDS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated) Note 11: Business Segment Information Net Sales Operating Profit (Loss) Total Assets Depreciation Expense Amortization Expense Capital Expenditures and Acquisitions 2003 ABL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,538,751 510,557 ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ 96,825 31,313 (17,862) $1,033,532 215,116 39,571 $33,664 8,356 829 $ 3,158 32 — $2,049,308 $110,276 $1,288,219 $42,849 $ 3,190 2002 ABL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,474,882 ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 497,914 Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ 89,553 44,931 (14,357) $1,100,175 220,165 37,614 $36,323 8,047 808 $1,972,796 $120,127 $1,357,954 $45,178 2001 ABL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,468,558 ASP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514,142 Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $118,829 41,337 (20,577) $1,082,676 211,579 36,320 $36,197 8,131 618 $1,982,700 $139,589 $1,330,575 $44,946 $ 4,196 120 — $ 4,316 $14,861 3,104 — $17,965 $20,063 8,024 67 $28,154 $47,342 10,456 449 $58,247 $37,389 8,912 1,310 $47,611 The geographic distribution of Acuity Brands’ net sales, operating profit, and long-lived assets is summarized in the following table: Net Sales (1) Domestic (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Operating profit Domestic (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Long-lived assets (2) Domestic (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International 2003 2002 2001 $1,779,569 269,739 $1,749,387 223,409 $1,749,498 233,202 $2,049,308 $1,972,796 $1,982,700 $ 94,325 15,951 $ 114,877 5,250 $ 130,044 9,545 $ 110,276 $ 120,127 $ 139,589 $ 663,355 66,312 $ 696,447 70,510 $ 730,590 40,869 $ 729,667 $ 766,957 $ 771,459 (1) Net Sales are attributed to each country based on the selling location. (2) Long-lived assets include net property, plant, and equipment, goodwill and intangibles, and other long-term assets. (3) Domestic amounts include net sales, operating profit, and long-lived assets for U.S. based operations. 65 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure At a meeting held on April 29, 2002, the Audit Committee of the board of directors of Acuity Brands voted to dismiss Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent accountant effective April 30, 2002 and approved the engagement of Ernst & Young LLP as its independent auditor for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2002. Further information is contained in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on April 30, 2002 and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 9a. Controls and Procedures Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As required by Commission rules, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of August 31, 2003. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at a reasonable assurance level. In addition, consistent with past practices, the Company has continued to enhance its disclosure controls and procedures during fiscal 2003 including formalizing certain policies and procedures, primarily those involving analyzing and reporting the financial results of its businesses. However, because all disclosure procedures must rely to some degree on actions or decisions made by employees throughout the organization, such as reporting of material events, the Company and its reporting officers believe that they cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company will be detected. Limitations within any control system, including the Company’s control system, include faulty judgments in decision-making or simple errors or mistakes. In addition, controls can be circumvented by an individual, by collusion between two or more people, or by management override of the control. Because of these limitations, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (a) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. There were no significant changes to the Company’s internal control structure over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 66 Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant PART III The information required by this item, with respect to directors, is included under the captions Director Nominees for Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2006 Annual Meeting and Directors with Terms Expiring at the 2004 and 2005 Annual Meetings of the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held December 18, 2003, filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by this item, with respect to executive officers, is included under the caption Management – Executive Officers of the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held December 18, 2003, filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by this item, with respect to beneficial ownership reporting, is included under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance of the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held December 18, 2003, filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information required by this item is included under the captions Compensation of Directors, Other Information Concerning the Board and its Committees, Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation, Summary Compensation Table, Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year, Aggregated Option Exercises and Fiscal Year-End Option Values, Employment Contracts, Severance Arrangements, and Other Agreements, and Pension and Supplemental Retirement Benefits of the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held December 18, 2003, filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The information required by this item is included under the captions Beneficial Ownership of the Corporation’s Securities and Disclosure with Respect to Equity Compensation Plans of the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held December 18, 2003, filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions The information required by this item is included under the caption Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions of the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held December 18, 2003, filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services The information required by this item is included under the caption Fees Billed by Independent Auditors of the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held December 18, 2003, filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference. 67 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K. (a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report: (1) Report of Management Report of Independent Auditors (Ernst & Young LLP) Report of Independent Public Accountants (Arthur Andersen LLP) Consolidated Balance Sheets –as of August 31, 2003 and 2002 Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (2) Financial Statement Schedules: Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Any of schedules I through V not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. (3) Exhibits filed with this report (begins on next page): Copies of exhibits will be furnished to stockholders upon request at a nominal fee. Requests should be sent to Acuity Brands, Inc., Investor Relations Department, 1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2400, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. (b) The Company filed Current Reports on Form 8-K on June 25, 2003 related to the Company’s third quarter 2003 earnings release, on August 25, 2003 related to the appointment of Jay M. Davis to the Company’s Board of Directors, and on August 29, 2003 related to the settlement of the patent infringement suit brought against it by Genlyte Thomas Group, LLC. 68 INDEX TO EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 2 Agreement and Plan of Distribution by and between National Service Industries, Inc. and Acuity Brands, Inc., dated as of November 30, 2001. Reference is made to Exhibit 2.1 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. EXHIBIT 3 (a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Acuity Brands, Inc. (b) Amended and Restated By-Laws of Acuity Brands, Inc. EXHIBIT 4 (a) Form of Certificate representing Acuity Brands, Inc. Common Stock. Reference is made to Exhibit 3.1 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 3.2 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 4.1 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. (b) Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2001, between Acuity Brands, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. Reference is made to Exhibit 4.2 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. (c) Letter Agreement appointing Successor Rights Agent. (d) First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 23, 2001, to Indenture dated January 26, 1999, between National Service Industries, Inc., L&C Spinco, Inc., L&C Lighting Group, Inc., The Zep Group, Inc. and SunTrust Bank. (e) Indenture dated as of January 26, 1999. (f) Form of 6% Note due February 1, 2009. (g) Form of 8.375% Note due August 1, 2010. Reference is made to Exhibit 4(c) of registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on July 14, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10.10 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration filed by L&C Statement on Form 10, Spinco, Inc. on September 6, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form 10, filed by L&C Spinco, Inc. on September 6, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10.13 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form 10, filed by L&C Spinco, Inc. on September 6, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. 69 EXHIBIT 10(i)A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Tax Disaffiliation Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2001, by and between National Service Industries, Inc. and Acuity Brands, Inc. Transition Services Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2001, by and between Inc. and National Service Industries, Acuity Brands, Inc. Agreement and Plan of Distribution, dated as of November 30, 2001, by and between National Service Industries, Inc. and Acuity Brands, Inc. Employee Benefits Agreement, by and between National Service Industries, Inc. and Acuity Brands, Inc., dated as of November 30, 2001. Put Option Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2001, by and between Inc. and National Service Industries, Acuity Brands, Inc. Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2001, by and between National Service and Acuity Brands, Inc. Industries, Inc. 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2001, among L&C the Subsidiary Borrowers Spinco, Inc., from time to time parties hereto, the Lenders from time to time parties hereto, Bank One, NA, as Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent as SunTrust and Documentation Agent. Bank 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of April 8, 2002, among Acuity Brands, Inc., the Subsidiary Borrowers the from time to time parties hereto, Lenders, from time to time parties hereto, Bank One, NA as Administrative Agent, and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent. 70 Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, by incorporated is which reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.2 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 2.1 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.4 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.24 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.9 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.23 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on Form 10, filed by L&C Inc. on October 29, 2001, Spinco, by is which reference. incorporated herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10(i)A(1) of registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on April 12, 2002, by incorporated is which reference. herein (9) (10) (11) Assignment Agreement and Amendment to Increase Aggregate Commitment to 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2002, by and among Bank One, NA and Wachovia Bank, N.A., Dresdner Bank AG New York & Grand Cayman Branches, Acuity Brands, Inc., Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. and Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., and Bank One, NA, in its capacity as Administrative Agent. 3-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of April 8, 2002, among Acuity Brands, Inc., the Subsidiary Borrowers from time to time parties hereto, Bank One, NA as Administrative Agent, and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent. Assignment Agreement and Amendment to to Increase Aggregate Commitment 3-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2002, by and among Bank One, NA and Wachovia Bank, N.A., Dresdner Bank AG New York & Grand Cayman Branches, Acuity Brands, Inc., Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. and Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., and Bank One, NA, in its capacity as Administrative Agent. (12) Deed to Secure Debt and Security Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2002. (13) Promissory Note, dated as of October 11, 2002. (14) and Restated Amended 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of April 4, 2003 among Acuity Brands, Inc., the Subsidiary Borrowers from time to time hereto, the Lenders from time to time parties hereto, Bank One, NA, as Administrative Agent, and Wachovia Bank, N.A. as Syndication Agent. 71 to Reference Exhibit is made 10(i)A(1) of registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on July 12, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference. to Exhibit is made Reference 10(i)A(2) of registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with on April 12, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference. the Commission to Reference Exhibit is made 10(i)A(2) of registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on July 12, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (i)A(12) of the registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on as November is incorporated by reference. 2002, which 12 Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (i)A(13) of the registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on as November is incorporated by reference. 2002, which 12, Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (i)A(1) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on as April 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. (15) Amendment No. 1 to 3-Year Revolving Credit Agreement. (16) First Modification to Deed to Secure Debt and Security Agreement. (17) Letter Agreement amending Agreement and Plan of Distribution. (18) Agreement and Consent Relating to Tax Disaffiliation Agreement. (19) (20) (21) (22) Credit and Security Agreement dated as of September 2, 2003 among Acuity Enterprise, Inc. and Acuity Unlimited Inc., as Borrowers, Acuity Lighting Group, Specialty Products Group, Inc., as Servicers, Blue the Ridge Asset Funding Corporation, Liquidity Banks from time to time party hereto and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Agent. and Acuity Inc. Sale and Contribution Receivables Agreement dated as of September 2, 2003 between Acuity Specialty Products Group, and Acuity as Seller, Enterprise, Inc., as Buyer. Inc., Amended and Restated Receivables Sale and Contribution Agreement dated as of September 2, 2003 between Acuity to Lighting Group, Inc., as National Service Industries, Seller, Inc., and Acuity Unlimited, formerly know as L&C Funding, Inc., as Buyer. successor Inc., Performance Undertaking dated as of September 2, 2003, executed by Acuity of Acuity Brands, Unlimited, Inc.. favor Inc. in 72 Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (i)A(2) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on April 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (i)A(3) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on as July 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (i)A(4) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on July 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (i)A(5) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on July 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. (23) Performance Undertaking dated as of September 2, 2003, executed by Acuity Brands, of Acuity Enterprise, Inc.. favor Inc. in EXHIBIT 10(iii)A Management Contracts and Compensatory Arrangements: (1) Acuity Brands, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. (2) Acuity Brands, Inc. 2001 Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Option Plan. (3) Amendment No. 1 to Acuity Brands, Inc. Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, dated December 20, 2001. (4) Form of Indemnification Agreement. (5) Form of Agreement. Severance Protection (6) Acuity Brands, Deferred Savings Plan. Inc. Supplemental (7) Acuity Brands, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan. (8) Acuity Brands, Inc. Senior Management Benefit Plan. 73 Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. Reference is made to Exhibit 10.5 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.6 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, by incorporated is which reference. herein to Reference Exhibit is made 10(iii)A(3) of registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on as January is which 2002, incorporated herein by reference. 14, Reference is made to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registration Statement on Form 10, filed by L&C Spinco, Inc. with the Commission on July 3, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10.8 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, by incorporated is which reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.14 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.15 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.16 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, by incorporated is which reference. herein (9) Acuity Brands, Director Deferred Stock Unit Plan. Inc. Nonemployee (10) Acuity Brands, Inc. Executive Benefits Trust. (11) (12) Acuity Brands, Retirement Plan for Executives. Inc. Supplemental Acuity Compensation and Incentive Plan. Brands, Inc. Management (13) Acuity Brands, Inc. Benefits Protection Trust. (14) (15) (16) (17) Assumption Letter of Acuity Brands, Inc. with respect to Employment Letter Agreement between National Service Industries, Inc. and James S. Balloun. Employment Letter Agreement between National Service Industries, Inc. and James S. Balloun, dated February 1, 1996. Assumption Letter of Acuity Brands, Inc. to Employment Letter with respect Agreement between National Service Industries, Inc. and Joseph G. Parham, Jr. Employment Letter Agreement between National Service Industries, Inc. and Joseph G. Parham, Jr., dated May 3, 2000. 74 Reference is made to Exhibit 10.17 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, by incorporated is which reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.18 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.19 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.20 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, by incorporated is which reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit 10.21 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein to Exhibit is made Reference 10.22(a)(i) of registrant’s Form 8-K as on filed with December is incorporated herein by reference. the Commission 2001, which 14, is made Exhibit to Reference 10(iii)A(2) of the Form 10-Q of National Service Industries, Inc. for the quarter ended November 30, 1997, which by incorporated is reference. herein to Reference Exhibit is made 10.22(b)(i) of registrant’s Form 8-K as on filed with December is incorporated herein by reference. the Commission 2001, which 14, is made Exhibit to Reference 10(iii)A(2) of the Form 10-Q of National Service Industries, Inc. for the quarter ended May 31, 2000, by incorporated is which reference. herein (18) Assumption Letter of Acuity Brands, Inc., with respect to Employment Letter Agreement between National Service Industries, Inc. and James H. Heagle. Reference is made to Exhibit 10.22(c) of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference. (19) Employment Letter Agreement between National Service Industries, Inc. and James H. Heagle, dated March 28, 2000. (20) Employment Letter Agreement between Acuity Brands, Inc. and Vernon J. Nagel, dated as of October 30, 2001. (21) Form of Acuity Brands, regarding Bonuses. Inc. Letter (22) Amended Management Incentive Plan. Acuity Brands, Compensation Inc. and Reference is made to Exhibit 10.22(d) to Amendment No. the Registration Statement on Form 10, on filed September is incorporated herein by reference. Inc. 2001, which by L&C Spinco, 27, to 3 to Reference Exhibit is made 10(iii)A(20) of registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on as is which 2002, January incorporated herein by reference. 14, Reference is made to Exhibit 10.25 of registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which by incorporated is reference. herein Reference is made to Exhibit A of for the registrant’s proxy statement Annual Meeting of Stockholders as on filed with November is incorporated herein by reference. the Commission 2002, which 12, (23) Amendment No. 1 to Acuity Brands, Inc. Supplemental Deferred Savings Plan. (24) Amendment No. 1 to Acuity Brands, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan. (25) Amendment No. 1 to Acuity Brands, Inc. Supplemental Retirement for Executives. Plan (26) Acuity Brands, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (iii)A(2) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on as is 2003, 14, January incorporated by reference. which Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (iii)A(3) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on as January is 2003, 14, incorporated by reference. which Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (iii)A(2) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on April 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (iii)A(3) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on April 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. 75 (27) (28) (29) (30) Agreement Letter to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan between Acuity Brands, Inc. and James H. Heagle. relating Agreement Letter to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan between Acuity Brands, Inc. and Vernon J. Nagel. relating Agreement to Letter Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan between Acuity Brands, Inc. and Joseph G. Parham, Jr. relating Agreement Letter to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan between Acuity Brands, Inc. and Kenyon W. Murphy. relating (31) Amendment No. 2 to Acuity Brands, Inc. Supplemental Deferred Savings Plan. (32) Form of Severance Agreement. EXHIBIT 14 Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. EXHIBIT 16 Letter of Arthur Andersen regarding Change in Certifying Accountant. EXHIBIT 21 List of Subsidiaries. EXHIBIT 23 Consent of Independent Auditors. EXHIBIT 24 Powers of Attorney. 76 Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (iii)A(3) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on July 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (iii)A(4) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on as July 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (iii)A(5) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on July 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (iii)A(6) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on July 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Reference is made to Exhibit 10 (iii)A(8) of the registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on as July 14, 2003, which is incorporated by reference. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10- K. Reference is made to Exhibit 16 of registrant’s Form 8-K/A as filed with the Commission on May 1, 2002, by incorporated is which reference. herein Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10- K. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10- K. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10- K. EXHIBIT 31 (a) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification, signed by James S. Balloun. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. (b) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification, signed by Vernon J. Nagel. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. EXHIBIT 32 (a) Section 1350 Certification, signed by James S. Balloun. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. (b) Section 1350 Certification, signed by Vernon J. Nagel. Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this Form 10-K. 77 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES Date: October 31, 2003 By: /s/ Vernon J. Nagel ACUITY BRANDS, INC. Vernon J. Nagel Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature /s/ James S. Balloun James S. Balloun /s/ Vernon J. Nagel Vernon J. Nagel L. M. Baker, Jr. * Peter C. Browning * John L. Clendenin Jay M. Davis * Earnest W. Deavenport, Jr. * Robert F. McCullough * Julia B. North * Ray M. Robinson * Neil Williams Title Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer and Director Date October 31, 2003 Executive Vice President and Chief October 31, 2003 Financial Officer Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director October 31, 2003 October 31, 2003 October 31, 2003 October 31, 2003 October 31, 2003 October 31, 2003 October 31, 2003 October 31, 2003 October 31, 2003 *By: /s/ Kenyon W. Murphy Attorney-in-Fact October 31, 2003 Kenyon W. Murphy 78 Schedule II Acuity Brands, Inc. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended August 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 (In thousands) Balance at Beginning of Year Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses Other Accounts(1) Deductions Balance at End of Year Year Ended August 31, 2003: Reserve for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,560 Reserve for estimated warranty costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,879 4,399 1,809 Reserve for estimated returns and allowances . . . . . . . . $ 4,317 57,166 Self-insurance reserve (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21,650 14,165 — — — — 4,325 $ 8,634 4,399 $ 4,289 56,180 $ 5,303 12,407 $23,408 Year Ended August 31, 2002: Reserve for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,195 Reserve for estimated warranty costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,823 5,445 3,003 55 5,135 $ 8,560 6,209 4,156 $ 6,879 Reserve for estimated returns and allowances . . . . . . . . $ 4,079 57,206 Self-insurance reserve (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17,938 13,007 Reserve for restructuring (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,130 (853) Year Ended August 31, 2001: Reserve for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,570 Reserve for warranty costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,164 4,930 1,806 Reserve for estimated returns and allowances . . . . . . . . $ 4,006 37,266 Self-insurance reserve (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,621 11,254 Reserve for restructuring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — 2,298 — — — — — — — — 56,968 $ 4,317 9,295 $21,650 1,277 $ — 3,305 $ 8,195 1,147 $ 1,823 37,193 $ 4,079 6,937 $17,938 168 $ 2,130 Includes reserves for workers’ compensation, auto, product, and general liability claims. (1) Recoveries credited to the reserve and reserves recorded in acquisitions. (2) (3) During fiscal 2002, management realized lower than anticipated costs associated with severance charges in the lighting equipment segment. Accordingly, the related reserve was reversed and $0.9 million in income was recorded and is included in Restructuring and other charges in the Consolidated Statements of Income. 79 Acuity Brands, Inc., with fiscal year 2003 net sales of approximately $2.0 billion, is comprised of Acuity Brands Lighting and Acuity Specialty Products. Acuity Brands Lighting is a world leader in lighting fixtures and includes brands such as Lithonia Lighting®, Holophane®, Peerless®, Hydrel®, and American Electric Lighting®. Acuity Specialty Products is a leading provider of specialty chemicals and includes brands such as Zep®, Enforcer®, and Selig Industries™. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Acuity Brands employs approximately 11,400 people and has operations throughout North America and in Europe and Asia. You’ll know us by our brands. SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS ACUITY BRANDS, INC. 1170 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2400 Atlanta, Georgia 30309-7676 404-853-1400 www.acuitybrands.com ACUITY BRANDS LIGHTING One Lithonia Way Conyers, Georgia 30012-3957 770-922-9000 www.acuitybrandslighting.com ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 4401 Northside Parkway Suite 700 Atlanta, Georgia 30327-3093 404-352-1680 www.acuitysp.com INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Ernst & Young LLP 600 Peachtree Street Suite 2800 Atlanta, Georgia 30308-2215 404-874-8300 ANNUAL MEETING 1:00 P.M. EST, Thursday, December 18, 2003 Renaissance Waverly Hotel Chambers Amphitheatre 2450 Galleria Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30339-3177 REPORTS AVAILABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS Copies of the following company reports may be obtained, without charge: 2003 Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission, filed on Form 10-K, and Quarterly Reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission, filed on Form 10-Q. Requests should be directed to: Acuity Brands, Inc. Attention: Investor Relations 1170 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2400 Atlanta, Georgia 30309-7676 404-853-1400 www.acuitybrands.com STOCK LISTING New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol: AYI TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR Questions about shareholder accounts, dividend checks and lost stock certifi- cates should be directed to: The Bank of New York Shareholder Relations Department – 12E P. O. Box 11258 Church Street Station New York, NY 10286-1258 800-432-0140 shareowners@bankofny.com www.stockbny.com Send certificates for transfer and address change to: The Bank of New York Receive and Deliver Department – 11W P.O. Box 11002 Church Street Station New York, NY 10286-1258 BuyDIRECTSM Acuity Brands’ transfer agent, The Bank of New York, offers the BuyDIRECT invest- ment plan, a direct purchase and sale plan for investors wishing to purchase Acuity Brands common stock. Dividends can be automatically reinvested. The plan is not sponsored or administered by Acuity Brands. For information regarding the plan, contact: The Bank of New York Church Street Station P.O. Box 11258 New York, NY 10286-1258 800-432-0140 ACCOUNT ACCESS Shareholders can access their account information at the Web site of Acuity Brands’ transfer agent, The Bank of New York, at www.stockbny.com or at www.acuitybrands.com. Shareholders can securely view their account information and check their holdings 24 hours a day. CASH DIVIDENDS Acuity Brands offers direct deposit of divi- dends to bank, savings, or money market accounts. For more information contact The Bank of New York at 800-432-0140. REMITTANCE OF OPTIONAL CASH INVESTMENTS AND PLAN TRANSACTION REQUESTS Mail the tear-off portion of transaction advice or account statements to: The Bank of New York Investment Services Department/ Acuity Brands P.O. Box 1958 Newark, New Jersey 07101-9774 SHAREHOLDERS OF RECORD The number of shareholders of record of Acuity Brands common stock was 5,322 as of October 23, 2003. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This annual report includes forward- looking statements regarding: (a) expected future results and (b) the impact of initiatives in each of the Com- pany’s businesses. A variety of factors could cause actual results to differ mate- rially from expected results including: (a) the uncertainty of general business conditions; (b) the level of success of the Company’s initiatives; and (c) the other risk factors more fully described in the accompanying financial informa- tion, which is separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2003. © 2003 Acuity Brands, Inc. All referenced trademarks are the property of their respective owners. a t n a l t A / e y e e e s e e s y b d e c u d o r p d n a d e n g s e d i Members of the Acuity Leadership Team (left to right): JAMES H. HEAGLE Executive Vice President Acuity Brands, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc. KENYON W. MURPHY Senior Vice President and General Counsel Acuity Brands, Inc. KENNETH W. HONEYCUTT, JR. Executive Vice President Acuity Brands, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. JAMES S. BALLOUN Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. JOSEPH G. PARHAM, JR. Senior Vice President, Human Resources Acuity Brands, Inc. JOHN K. MORGAN Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. VERNON J. NAGEL Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Acuity Brands, Inc. On the cover (left to right): WENDY MCBAY Strategic Pricing Manager Lithonia Lighting CHRIS TUTTLE Assistant Controller Acuity Brands, Inc. MAI TRAN OEM Sourcing Manager Acuity Brands Lighting 2003 Annual Report On Our WAY Acuity Brands, Inc. 1170 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2400 Atlanta, Georgia 30309-7676 404-853-1400 www.acuitybrands.com A c u i t y B r a n d s , I n c . 2 0 0 3 A n n u a l R e p o r t ACUITY BRANDS WAY The Acuity Brands Way is our creed – it provides the fundamentals for creating and sustaining value for our customers, employees, and shareholders. It is the spirit of our business life together; it is what we create together. There are four building blocks to the Acuity Brands Way: • Our mission Our mission is to take good companies and make them great companies. • Our values Great companies show integrity by consistently behaving in ways that reflect their core values. We place confidence in our employees who demonstrate our four values: resolute, team- oriented, creative, and aspirational. • How we work together We work together constructively by demonstrating leadership, respect, and commitment. We are trans- parent with others and share our successes. We empower our employees to make decisions and contribute to our communities. • How we create value Great companies consistently create more value for their customers, employees, and shareholders than other companies. We are committed to creating value through setting high aspirations, measuring performance, achieving operating plans, committing to continuous improvement, and making changes faster than our competitors. The Acuity Brands Way guides how we do business and how we treat one another. Through the Acuity Brands Way, we’re on our way to high performance.