AeroCentury Corp. Annual Report 2011

← All annual reports

FY2011 Annual Report · AeroCentury Corp.

Loading PDF…

Annual Report Cover 3-10 3/3/10 11:55 AM Page 1

Worldwide • Regional Aircraft • Leasing

AeroCentury Corp.

1440 Chapin Ave., Suite 310
Burlingame, CA 94010
650-340-1888
Fax: 650-696-3929
www.aerocentury.com

2011 Annual Report

TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS

2011 was a challenging year for AeroCentury. Although the Company posted its first annual
loss following seven years of positive earnings, recording a $0.94 loss per diluted share, it had a
profitable fourth quarter of $0.79 earnings per diluted share.

Lower average utilization as well as a revenue reserve for one customer resulted in a $3.4 million
and a $3.7 million decrease in operating lease revenue and maintenance reserves revenue,
respectively, in 2011 compared to 2010. This was partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in
gain on disposal of assets in 2011 compared to 2010 related to the sale of two aircraft and receipt
of insurance proceeds for the loss of a third aircraft. It is important to note that, although the
Company recorded $10.9 million of maintenance expense in 2011, $7.8 million of that amount
was funded by non-refundable maintenance reserves.

In November 2011, the Company added the Saab 340B Plus aircraft model to its portfolio with
the acquisition of two of those aircraft on lease to a new customer in Asia. In January 2012, the
Company purchased a Bombardier Dash 8-Q314 aircraft on lease to another new customer in
Asia. The Company’s portfolio now consists of forty-three aircraft and three aircraft engines,
and covers nine different aircraft types. Our customer base continues to consist exclusively of
regional carriers – twenty different airlines operating passenger flights in all parts of the world.

The global airline industry is continuing to experience contraction and ensuing financial
difficulty due to the protracted downturn in the world economy. Passenger volume has fallen
significantly, and the loss of revenue has affected many carriers’ financial condition. The slow
recovery from this downturn and the current European financial crisis continue to create a
challenging environment for the Company.

In spite of this, the Company found opportunities in 2011 to refresh its portfolio with the sale and
purchase transactions mentioned above, while continuing to actively manage its portfolio, with
nine lease extensions during 2011 and the re-lease of seven aircraft that were off-lease in 2010.

I appreciate your interest and support.

Neal D. Crispin
President and Chairman of the Board

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 001-13387

AeroCentury Corp.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

94-3263974
(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1440 Chapin Avenue, Suite 310
Burlingame, California 94010
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (650) 340-1888

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share

Name of each exchange on which registered
NYSE AMEX Exchange

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated
by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer 
Non-accelerated filer 

Accelerated filer 
Smaller reporting company 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  No 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing price as
of June 30, 2011) was $15,631,500.

The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 9, 2012 was 1,543,257.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates information by reference from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its
2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Except as expressly incorporated by reference, the Registrant’s Proxy Statement shall not
be deemed to be a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Statements

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (“the Exchange Act”). All statements in this Report other than statements of historical fact are "forward-
looking statements" for purposes of these provisions, including any statements of plans and objectives for future
operations and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Statements that include the use of
terminology such as "may," "will," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "estimates," "potential," or "continue," or the
negative thereof, or other comparable terminology are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
include: (i) in Part I, Item 1, “Business,” the Company’s statements regarding its belief that the Company can
purchase assets at an appropriate price and maintain an acceptable overall on-lease rate for them; that the Company
is able to enter into transactions with a wider range of lessees than its competitors; that the Company’s available
cash and credit should be sufficient to meet the Company’s needs through the next twelve months; that the Company
expects it will have sufficient cash flow to cover expenses and provide excess cash flow; that the Company expects
to have sufficient cash flow or borrowing availability under the Credit Facility to fund unusually large maintenance
expenses; that competition may increase if competitors who have traditionally neglected the regional air carrier
market begin to focus on that market; that the Company has a competitive advantage due to its experience and
operational efficiency in financing the transaction sizes that are desired by many in the regional air carrier market;
that the Company has a competitive advantage because JMC has developed a reputation as a global participant in the
regional aircraft leasing market; and that neither compliance with laws regulating discharge of greenhouse gas
and/or aircraft noise regulations, nor remedial agreements or other actions relating to the environment, are expected
to have a material effect on the Company’s capital expenditures, financial condition, and results of operations or
competitive position; (ii) in Part II, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings,” the Company’s statement regarding its belief that
none of the current lessee collection litigation, if resolved adverse to the Company, is anticipated to have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations; (iii) in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources,” the
Company’s statements regarding its belief that it will continue to be in compliance with its Credit Facility covenants
in 2012; and that the Company will have adequate cash flow to fund operational needs and payments required under
the Credit Facility and that this belief is based on reasonable assumptions; (iv) in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations –– Outlook,” the Company’s statements
that the Company will likely experience lower on-lease utilization rates, longer lead times, as well as lower rental
rates for remarketed assets and that this will continue to affect the Company’s operating revenue in 2012; that there
is likely to be a significant decrease in the pool of customers requiring aircraft; that the Company’s portfolio growth
will continue to be slow; that it is possible that additional maintenance expense will be incurred in the process of
remarketing certain assets to new customers, and that the amount of such expense could exceed the amount of
reserves previously collected for the assets; that the availability under the Credit Facility should be sufficient to fund
its anticipated asset acquisitions through the end of 2012; that the Company will need to negotiate an extension or
replacement of the Credit Facility by April 2013; that the Company will be in compliance with all Credit Facility
covenants in 2012; and that the Company does not anticipate any trend developing that will result in additional
deferral agreements in 2012; (v) in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations – Factors that May Affect Future Results,” the Company’s statements regarding its belief
that it will have sufficient cash funds to make any payment that arises due to any collateral base limitations; that the
Company will continue to be in compliance with its Credit Facility covenants; that the availability under the Credit
Facility will be sufficient to fund projected acquisitions through the end of 2012; that the overall industry experience
of JMC’s personnel and its technical resources should permit the Company to effectively manage such new aircraft
types and engines; that there are effective mitigating factors against undue compensation-incented risk-taking by
JMC; that the costs of complying with environmental regulations will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company; that the Company has sufficient cyber-security measures in place commensurate with the risks to the
Company of a successful cyber-attack or breach of security; and that the Company believes that sufficient
replacement mechanisms exist in the event of an interruption in its internet communications ability; and (vi) in Part
II, Item 8, “Financial Statements,” the Company’s statements regarding its compliance with Credit Facility
covenants in 2012; its belief that future taxable income will not be sufficient to realize the tax benefits of all the
deferred tax assets on the balance sheet; and that it expects to deliver a Fokker-100 aircraft to a new lessee in the
second quarter of 2012.

These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and it is important to note that the Company's
actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in such forward-looking statements. Among
the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the factors detailed under the heading
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Factors That May
Affect Future Results," including the impact of the ongoing economic downturn on the Company’s customer base of
regional air carriers and certain current lessees of the Company, in particular; the compliance of the Company's
lessees with obligations under their respective leases; risks related to use of debt financing for acquisitions; the
Company’s success in finding appropriate assets to acquire with such financing; deviations from assumptions
regarding maintenance cost on returned aircraft and that future major maintenance expenses will be relatively evenly
spaced over the entire portfolio; and future trends and results which cannot be predicted with certainty. The
cautionary statements made in this Report should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking
statements wherever they appear herein. All forward-looking statements and risk factors included in this document
are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to the Company as of the date hereof, and the
Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or risk factor. You should consult the risk
factors listed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 1.

Business.

Business of the Company

AeroCentury Corp., a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1997 (the “Company”), acquires used regional aircraft
and aircraft engines for lease to foreign and domestic regional carriers.

The business of the Company is managed by JetFleet Management Corp. ("JMC"), pursuant to a management
agreement between the Company and JMC (the “Management Agreement”), which is an integrated aircraft
management, marketing and financing business and a subsidiary of JetFleet Holding Corp. ("JHC"). Certain
officers of the Company are also officers of JHC and JMC and hold significant ownership positions in both JHC and
the Company.

Since its formation, the Company has been engaged in the business of investing in used regional aircraft equipment
leased to foreign and domestic regional air carriers. The Company’s principal business objective is to increase
stockholder value by acquiring aircraft assets and managing those assets in order to provide a return on investment
through lease revenue and, eventually, sale proceeds. The Company strives to achieve its business objective by
reinvesting cash flow and using short-term and long-term debt and/or equity financing.

The Company’s success in achieving its objective depends in large part on its success in three areas: asset selection,
lessee selection and obtaining financing for acquisition of aircraft and engines.

The Company typically acquires additional assets in one of three ways. The Company may purchase an asset
already subject to a lease and assume the rights and obligations of the seller, as lessor under the existing lease.
Additionally, the Company may purchase an asset from an air carrier and lease it back to the seller. Finally, the
Company may purchase an asset from a seller and then immediately enter into a new lease for the aircraft with a
third party lessee. In this last case, the Company typically does not purchase an asset unless a potential lessee has
been identified and has committed to lease the asset. Occasionally, the Company may also acquire an asset for
which it does not have a potential lessee.

The Company generally targets used regional aircraft and engines with purchase prices between $3 million and $10
million, and lease terms less than five years. In determining assets for acquisition, the Company evaluates, among
other things, the type of asset, its current price and projected future value, its versatility or specialized uses, the
current and projected availability of and demand for that asset, and the type and number of future potential lessees.
Because JMC has extensive experience in purchasing, leasing and selling used regional aircraft, the Company
believes it can purchase these assets at an appropriate price and maintain an acceptable overall on-lease rate for the
Company’s assets.

In order to improve the remarketability of an aircraft after expiration of the lease, the Company focuses on having
lease provisions for its aircraft that contain required maintenance and return conditions such that when the lessee
returns the aircraft, the Company receives the aircraft in a condition which allows it to expediently re-lease or sell
the aircraft, or receives sufficient payments based on usage over the lease term to cover any maintenance or overhaul
of the aircraft required to bring the aircraft to such a state.

When considering whether to accept transactions with a lessee, the Company examines the creditworthiness of the
lessee, its short and long-term growth prospects, its financial status and backing, the experience of its management,
and the impact of pending governmental regulation or de-regulation of the lessee’s market, all of which are weighed
in determining the deal terms offered to the lessee. In addition, where applicable, it is the Company’s policy to
monitor the lessee’s business and financial performance closely throughout the term of the lease, and if requested,
provide assistance drawn from the experience of the Company’s management in many areas of the air carrier
industry. Because of its “hands-on” approach to portfolio management, the Company believes it is able and willing
to enter into transactions with a wider range of lessees than would be possible for traditional, large lending
institutions and leasing companies.

The Company has funded its asset acquisitions primarily through debt financing supplemented by free cash flow.
The Company’s primary source of debt financing has been secured credit facilities. The Company currently has a

$90 million secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) provided by a syndicate of banks, with Union Bank, N.A.
as agent, that expires on April 29, 2013.

An additional $14 million in debt financing was raised through the issuance of 16% senior unsecured subordinated
notes ("Subordinated Notes") in 2007 and 2008, the proceeds of which were used to pay down amounts previously
borrowed under the Credit Facility. The Subordinated Notes were fully repaid as required on December 30, 2011.
The Company has previously financed several asset acquisitions with lenders through asset-based term loans using
special purpose subsidiaries.

The Company believes that its current cash position, cash generated through operations, and unused credit available
under the Credit Facility should be sufficient to meet the Company’s needs through the next twelve months.

Working Capital Needs

The Company’s portfolio of assets has historically generated revenues that have exceeded the Company’s cash
expenses, which consist mainly of management fees, maintenance expense, principal and interest payments on debt,
professional fees, and insurance premiums.

The Company's management fees payable to JMC are based upon the size of the asset pool. Maintenance costs for
off-lease aircraft and costs funded by non-refundable reserves are recognized as an expense as incurred. Interest
expense is dependent on the outstanding balances of the Company’s indebtedness. Professional fees are paid to third
parties for expenses not covered by JMC under the Management Agreement. Insurance expense includes amounts
paid for directors and officers insurance, as well as product liability insurance and aircraft hull insurance for periods
when an aircraft is off lease.

So long as the Company succeeds in keeping the majority of its assets on lease and interest rates do not rise
significantly and rapidly, the Company’s cash flow should continue to be sufficient to cover these expenses and
provide excess cash flow. If the Company incurs unusually large maintenance expense in any given period, the
Company expects it will have sufficient cash flow, or borrowing availability under its credit facility, to fund such
maintenance.

Competition

The Company competes with other leasing companies, banks, financial institutions, and aircraft leasing partnerships
for customers who generally are regional commercial aircraft operators seeking to lease aircraft under an operating
lease. Management believes that competition may increase if competitors who have traditionally neglected the
regional air carrier market begin to focus on that market. Because competition is largely based on price and lease
terms, the entry of these new competitors into the market, and/or traditional large aircraft lessors into the regional
aircraft niche, particularly those with greater access to capital markets than the Company, could lead to fewer
acquisition opportunities for the Company and/or lease terms less favorable to the Company on new acquisitions, as
well as renewals of existing leases or new leases of existing aircraft, all of which could lead to lower revenues for
the Company.

The Company, however, believes that it has a competitive advantage due to its experience and operational efficiency
in financing the transaction sizes that are desired by many in the regional air carrier market. Management believes
that the Company also has a competitive advantage because JMC has developed a presence as a global participant in
the regional aircraft leasing market.

Dependence on Significant Customers

For the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company had three significant customers, which accounted for 19%,
14% and 13%, respectively, of lease revenue. Concentration of credit risk with respect to lease receivables will
diminish in the future only if the Company is able to lease additional assets or re-lease to new customers assets
currently on lease to significant customers.

Environmental Matters

Neither compliance with federal, state and local provisions regulating discharge of greenhouse gas emissions
(including carbon dioxide (CO2)) in the environment and/or aircraft noise regulations, nor remedial agreements or
other actions relating to the environment, has had, or is expected to have, a material effect on the Company’s capital
expenditures, financial condition, results of operations or competitive position.

Employees

Under the Company’s management contract with JMC, JMC is responsible for all administration and management
of the Company. Consequently, the Company does not have any employees.

Available Information

The headquarters of AeroCentury Corp. is located at 1440 Chapin Avenue, Suite 310, Burlingame, California
94010. The main telephone number is (650) 340-1888.

The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act (the “Exchange Act”).
Therefore, the Company files periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Such reports, proxy statements and other information may be obtained by
visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 or by calling the SEC
at (800) SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

Item 2.

Properties.

As of December 31, 2011, the Company did not own or lease any real property, plant or materially important
physical properties. The Company maintains its principal office at 1440 Chapin Avenue, Suite 310, Burlingame,
California 94010. However, since the Company has no employees and the Company’s portfolio of leased aircraft
assets is managed and administered under the terms of the Management Agreement with JMC, all office facilities
are provided by JMC.

At December 31, 2011, the Company owned one Bombardier Dash-8-Q400, eight Bombardier Dash-8-300, two
deHavilland DHC-8-100, one deHavilland DHC-6, fourteen Fokker 50, one Saab 340A, six Saab 340B, two Saab
340B Plus, and seven Fokker 100 aircraft, as well as three General Electric CF34-8E aircraft engines which are on
lease or held for lease.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings.

The Company is not involved in any material legal proceedings. The Company from time to time engages in
ordinary course litigation relating to collection matters against defaulting lessees. None of the current lessee
collection litigation, if resolved adverse to the Company, is anticipated to have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

The shares of the Company’s Common Stock are traded on the NYSE AMEX exchange (“AMEX”) under the
symbol “ACY.”

Market Information

The Company’s Common Stock has been traded on the AMEX since January 16, 1998. The following table sets
forth the high and low sales prices reported on the AMEX for the Company’s Common Stock for the periods
indicated:

Period

High

Low

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2011:

Fourth Quarter ...............................
Third Quarter ..................................
Second Quarter ...............................
First Quarter ...................................
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2010:

Fourth Quarter ...............................
Third Quarter ..................................
Second Quarter ...............................
First Quarter ...................................

8.20
14.48
15.00
24.00

18.18
22.38
25.00
21.50

5.30
6.27
9.54
11.51

14.33
13.00
17.65
13.33

On March 8, 2012, the closing sale price of the Company’s Common Stock on the NYSE AMEX exchange was
$10.03 per share.

Number of Security Holders

According to the Company’s transfer agent, the Company had approximately 1,700 stockholders of record as of
March 5, 2012. Because brokers and other institutions on behalf of beneficial stockholders hold many of the
Company’s shares of Common Stock, the Company is unable to estimate the total number of beneficial stockholders
represented by those record holders.

Dividends

No dividends have been declared or paid to date. The Company has no plans at this time to declare or pay
dividends, and intends to re-invest any earnings into the acquisition of additional revenue-generating aircraft
equipment.

The terms of the Credit Facility prohibit the Company from declaring or paying dividends on its Common Stock,
except for cash dividends in an aggregate annual amount not to exceed 50% of the Company's net income in the
immediately preceding fiscal year so long as immediately prior to and immediately following such dividend the
Company is not in default under the Credit Facility.

Stockholder Rights Plan

price, the number of units of preferred stock and the type of securities issuable upon exercise of the rights are subject
to adjustment. The rights expire at the close of business December 1, 2019 unless earlier redeemed or exchanged.
Until a right is exercised, the holder thereof, as such, has no rights as a stockholder of the Company, including the
right to vote or to receive dividends.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data.

This report does not include information described under Item 301 of Regulation S-K pursuant to the rules of the
SEC that permit “smaller reporting companies” to omit such information.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

The Company owns regional aircraft and engines, which are typically leased to customers under triple net operating
leases. The Company defines an “operating lease” as a lease with a term that is less than the useful life of the asset.
A “triple net operating lease” is an operating lease under which, in addition to monthly rental payments, the lessee is
generally responsible for the taxes, insurance and maintenance and repair of the aircraft arising from the use and
operation of the aircraft during the term of the lease. The acquisition of such equipment is generally made using
debt financing. The Company’s profitability and cash flow are dependent in large part upon its ability to acquire
equipment, obtain and maintain favorable lease rates on such equipment, and re-lease or sell equipment that comes
off lease. The Company is subject to the credit risk of its lessees, both as to collection of rental payments and as to
performance by lessees of their obligations to maintain the equipment. Since lease rates for assets in the Company’s
portfolio generally decline as the assets age, the Company’s ability to maintain revenue and earnings is primarily
dependent upon the Company’s ability to acquire and lease additional assets.

The Company’s primary uses of cash are for maintenance expense, purchase of aircraft and engines, debt service
payments, management fees, insurance and professional fees.

The Company's most significant non-cash expenses include aircraft and engine depreciation and, in some years,
impairment provisions, which are affected by significant estimates, and, through December 31, 2011, amortization
of costs associated with the Company’s Subordinated Notes, which is included in interest expense.

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates

The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. In the event that actual results differ from
these estimates or the Company adjusts these estimates in future periods, the Company’s operating results and
financial position could be materially affected.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Notes 1 and 3 to the financial statements. The
Company believes that the most critical accounting policies include the following: Aircraft Capitalization and
Depreciation; Impairment of Long-lived Assets; Maintenance Reserves and Accrued Costs; Accounting for Income
Taxes; and Revenue Recognition, Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.

Aircraft Capitalization and Depreciation

The Company’s interests in aircraft and aircraft engines are recorded at cost, which includes acquisition costs. Since
inception, the Company has purchased only used aircraft and aircraft engines. It is the Company’s policy to hold
aircraft for approximately twelve years unless market conditions dictate otherwise. Therefore, depreciation on
aircraft is initially computed using the straight-line method over the twelve-year period to an estimated residual
value based on appraisal. The Company estimates the period over which it will hold aircraft engines based upon
estimated usage, repair costs and other factors, and depreciates them to their appraised residual value over such
period using the straight-line method. The amount of the depreciation expense recognized by the Company during
any accounting period with respect to a particular asset depends upon the estimated holding period over which such
asset is depreciated.

The Company periodically reviews plans for lease or sale of its aircraft and aircraft engines and changes, as
appropriate, the remaining expected holding period for such assets. Estimated residual values are reviewed and
adjusted periodically, based upon updated appraised residual estimates and the expected holding periods. Decreases
in the market value of aircraft could affect not only the current value, discussed above, but also the estimated
residual value. A reduction in the estimated residual value of an asset results in an increase in the amount of
depreciation expense recognized by the Company during the remaining holding period of the asset.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews assets for impairment when there has been an event or a change in circumstances indicating
that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. In addition, the Company routinely reviews
all assets for impairment annually. Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to
the future estimated undiscounted cash flows (without interest charges) that the asset is expected to generate.
Estimates are based on currently available market data and independent appraisals and are subject to fluctuation
from time to time. If these estimated cash flows are less than the carrying value of an asset at the time of evaluation,
any impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its
fair value. Fair value is determined by reference to independent appraisals and other factors considered relevant by
management. Significant management judgment is required in the forecasting of future operating results that are
used in the preparation of future estimated undiscounted cash flows and, if different conditions prevail in the future,
material write-downs may occur. No impairment provision was recorded in 2011 or 2010.

Maintenance Reserves and Accrued Costs

Maintenance costs under the Company’s triple net operating leases are typically the responsibility of the lessees, and
the majority of the Company’s leases require the payment of monthly maintenance reserves. Maintenance reserves
and accrued costs in the accompanying balance sheets include: (i) refundable maintenance payments billed to
lessees, which are paid out as related maintenance is performed or at the end of the lease, (ii) for lessees that pay
non-refundable maintenance reserves, estimated maintenance costs accrued at the time a reimbursement claim or
sufficient information is received regarding maintenance work performed, and (iii) maintenance for work performed
for off-lease aircraft, which is not related to the release of reserves received from lessees.

Non-refundable maintenance reserves are reflected as revenue based on reported usage, if collectibility is reasonably
assured. The Company uses the direct expense method, under which maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Maintenance reserves are determined by mutual agreement of the Company and its lessee at inception of the lease
and are based on the Company's estimate of the total maintenance cost at some future point resulting from the
lessee’s usage. Reserve rates are typically subject to an annual adjustment provision that accounts for inflation of
maintenance costs. If a lessee is required to repair a component during the lease or perform a repair at lease end in
order to comply with aircraft return conditions, it will be entitled to collect the reserves related to that repair from
the Company, and any excess costs would then be the responsibility of the lessee. Therefore, if maintenance rates
do not accurately reflect the true cost of a repair, the Company will not incur any financial impact. If, however, the
Company repossesses an aircraft upon a lessee default, the Company would incur expense for the entire cost of the
maintenance. If maintenance rates under a defaulted lease inaccurately reflect amounts less than the costs of the
lessee's usage, such costs would be in excess of collected reserves. It is also possible that, in order to remarket a

repossessed aircraft, certain inspections and repairs may need to be performed earlier than otherwise required by the
manufacturer or regulatory specifications. In such a case, the collected reserves from the defaulted lessee, which
were established assuming a normal interval between repairs, would likely be insufficient to cover the total cost
incurred by the Company.

In 2010, several aircraft were returned to the Company prior to their respective lease expirations. The Company
incurred significant maintenance expense as a result of the returns, and, in some cases, the maintenance reserves
retained by the Company at the time of the returns were insufficient to cover the required maintenance.

Accounting for Income Taxes

As part of the process of preparing the Company’s financial statements, management is required to estimate income
taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. This process involves estimating the Company’s
current tax exposure under the most recent tax laws and assessing temporary and permanent differences resulting
from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“GAAP”) purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in
the balance sheet. Management must also assess the likelihood that the Company’s deferred tax assets will be
recovered from future taxable income, and, to the extent management believes it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the Company must establish a valuation allowance. To
the extent the Company establishes a valuation allowance or changes the allowance in a period, the Company
reflects the corresponding increase or decrease in the tax provision in the statements of operations. The Company
had no material unrecognized tax positions in 2011 or 2010, and had valuation allowances of $158,600 in 2011 and
$0 in 2010.

Significant management judgment is required in estimating the Company’s future taxable income for purposes of
assessing the Company’s ability to realize any benefit from its deferred taxes. If actual taxable income is less than
these estimates or if the Company adjusts its estimates of future taxable income, the Company may not realize any
benefit from its deferred tax assets and its operating results and financial condition could be materially affected.

Revenue Recognition, Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Revenue from leasing of aircraft assets is recognized as operating lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the
terms of the applicable lease agreements. A receivable for deferred rent is recorded when the cash rent received is
lower than the straight-line revenue recognized. Such receivables decrease over the term of the applicable leases.
Non-refundable maintenance reserves billed to lessees are accrued as maintenance reserves revenue based on
aircraft usage. In instances where collectibility is not reasonably assured, the Company recognizes revenue as cash
payments are received. The Company estimates and charges to income a provision for bad debts based on its
business experience and with each specific customer, the level of past due accounts, and its analysis of the lessee’s
overall financial condition. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers deteriorates, it could result in
actual losses exceeding the estimated allowances.

During 2011, due to uncertainty about the collectibility of the related receivables, the Company recorded a
$1,924,400 bad debt allowance and recorded related reduced operating lease revenue of $470,500, reduced
maintenance reserves revenue of $552,900, reduced maintenance reserves and accrued maintenance costs of
$12,300, and increased maintenance expense of $888,700.

Results of Operations

The Company’s net income decreased by $3,098,500 in the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010, due
primarily to decreased operating lease revenue and maintenance reserves revenue and increased maintenance,
general and administrative expense and insurance expense, the aggregate effect of which was partially offset by
decreased depreciation and interest expense and an increase in gain on disposal of assets.

Operating lease revenue decreased by $3,362,300 in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily because of: (i) a $2,716,900
decrease related to aircraft that were on lease in 2010 but off lease for all or part of the 2011 period; (ii) a
$1,803,900 decrease related to aircraft that were re-leased during 2010 and 2011 at lower rates; (iii) a $470,500

decrease related to two aircraft for which the Company recorded a bad debt allowance in 2011; and (iv) a $312,500
decrease related to aircraft dispositions in 2010 and 2011. The effects of these reductions were partially offset by a
$2,404,300 increase related to assets that were on lease in 2011 period but were off lease or subject to bad debt
allowances for all or part of the same period of 2010 and to two aircraft that were acquired and leased in 2011.

Maintenance reserves revenue decreased by $3,740,900 in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily as a result of lower
average usage by some lessees in the 2011 period and the effect of off-lease aircraft, as well as reduced maintenance
reserves revenue from two aircraft for which the Company recorded a revenue reserve in 2011. The 2010 period
included maintenance reserves revenue of $3,263,300 related to refundable maintenance reserves retained by the
Company when two aircraft were repossessed in early 2010. Such funds were used for maintenance required by the
return conditions of the leases.

Gain on disposal of assets increased by $955,000 in 2011 compared to 2010. During 2011, the Company recorded
net gains on the sale of two aircraft and a net gain related to insurance proceeds for the loss of an aircraft. During
2010, the Company recorded a net gain on insurance proceeds related to the loss of an aircraft, as well as gains on
the sale of spare parts and of an engine that was replaced on one of the Company’s aircraft.

The Company recognized $238,800 less in maintenance expense in 2011 than in 2010, primarily as a result of a
$1,253,700 decrease in maintenance performed by lessees using non-refundable reserves, the effect of which was
partially offset by a $464,000 increase in maintenance performed on off-lease aircraft, as well as a $523,400
increase in amounts that were advanced on behalf of customers in connection with maintenance performed on the
Company’s aircraft but for which repayment was not reasonably assured.

During 2011 and 2010, $7,834,600 and $8,860,800, respectively, of the Company’s maintenance expense for off-
lease aircraft and maintenance performed by lessees were funded by non-refundable maintenance reserves that had
been recorded as revenue when earned.

Depreciation expense decreased by $1,796,800 in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily due to changes in estimated
residual values, which the Company analyzes and adjusts periodically based on third party appraisals, the effect of
which was partially offset by depreciation related to aircraft purchased in late 2010 and 2011.

Professional fees, general and administrative and other expenses increased by approximately $321,000 in 2011
compared to 2010, as a result of higher legal and accounting expense and the forfeiture of a deposit when the
Company did not purchase an aircraft for which the Company had previously executed a letter of intent.

Insurance expense for off-lease aircraft increased by $316,900 in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily due to aircraft
that were on lease in 2010 but off lease in 2011.

In 2010, a customer that leased two Fokker 50 aircraft and another customer that leased three Fokker 100 aircraft
experienced severe financial difficulties, and all five aircraft were returned to the Company. The Fokker 100 lessee
was a significant customer based on 2010 lease revenue. The Company retained the entire $12,752,500 of non-
refundable maintenance reserves from both customers that were previously recorded as maintenance reserves
revenue. The Company has incurred significant maintenance expenses in order to prepare the five aircraft for lease
to new customers. Approximately $5,963,000 and $4,173,000 of such costs were incurred during the years ended
December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The two Fokker 50 aircraft were re-leased to a new customer during
2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company is currently financing its assets primarily through debt financing and excess cash flows.

(a)

Credit Facility

In April 2010, the Company’s previous $80 million credit facility was replaced with a new, two-year $75 million
Credit Facility provided by a syndicate of banks, with Union Bank, N.A. as agent. In June 2010, the Credit Facility
was increased to $90 million, with the addition of a new participant bank’s commitment of $15 million. In March

2012, the Credit Facility was extended for one year, to April 29, 2013, on terms similar to the original agreement.
The Credit Facility is secured by all of the assets of the Company, including its aircraft and engine portfolio.

During 2011, the Company borrowed $6,500,000 and repaid $4,300,000. As of September 30, 2011, the Company
was out of compliance with a financial ratio covenant of the Credit Facility, but was granted a waiver of compliance
with this covenant by the Credit Facility banks, applicable to the September 30, 2011 calculation. As of December
31, 2011 and 2010, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Facility agreement.
Although the Company believes it will continue to be in compliance with all of the Credit Facility covenants in
2012, there can be no assurance of such compliance. Any default under the Credit Facility, if not waived by the
lenders, could result in foreclosure upon any or all of the existing assets of the Company.

As of March 9, 2012, the Company had an outstanding balance of $72,600,000 under the Credit Facility. Although
the total maximum credit under the Credit Facility is currently $90,000,000, exclusion of certain assets from the
collateral base has decreased the available credit to $13,765,000.

The Company’s interest expense will generally increase and decrease with prevailing interest rates. The Company
has the ability to enter into interest rate swaps to economically hedge against interest rate increases in its floating
rate debt under the Credit Facility. The Company has done so in the past and may do so in the future.

(b)

Senior unsecured subordinated debt

In April 2007, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Subordinated Notes Agreement”),
whereby the Company would issue 16% Subordinated Notes, with an aggregate principal amount of $28 million to
certain note purchasers. In July 2008, the Company and the holders of Subordinated Notes agreed to amend the
Subordinated Notes Agreement to reduce the maximum amount of Subordinated Notes to be issued from $28
million to $14 million.

During 2011 and 2010, the Company repaid $2,343,500 and $4,538,000, respectively, of principal under the
Subordinated Notes. The final amortizing payment was made on December 30, 2011.

The purchasers of the Subordinated Notes hold warrants to purchase up to 81,224 shares of the Company's common
stock at an exercise price of $8.75 per share. The warrants are exercisable for a four-year period that commenced at
the maturity of the Subordinated Notes on December 30, 2011. Pursuant to an investors' rights agreement, the
warrants are subject to registration rights that require the Company to use commercially reasonable efforts to
register the shares issued upon exercise of the warrants on a registration statement filed with the SEC.

(c)

Cash flow

The Company’s primary sources of cash are (i) operating lease revenue and (ii) maintenance reserves billed monthly
to lessees based on aircraft usage. Cash collected by the Company for maintenance reserves is not required by the
leases to be segregated and is included in cash and cash equivalents on the Company’s balance sheets.

The Company’s primary uses of cash are for maintenance expense, management fees, professional fees, insurance,
purchase of aircraft and engines, Credit Facility interest payments and, through 2011, principal and interest
payments due for the Company’s Subordinated Notes, which were repaid in full on December 30, 2011. The
amount of interest paid by the Company depends on the outstanding balance of its Credit Facility, which carries a
floating interest rate as well as an interest rate margin, and is therefore also dependent on changes in prevailing
interest rates.

The timing and amount of the Company’s payments for maintenance vary, depending on the timing of lessee-
performed maintenance that is eligible for reimbursement, the aggregate amount of such claims and the timing and
amount of maintenance incurred in connection with preparation of off-lease assets for re-lease to new customers.
The Company’s maintenance payments constitute a large portion of its cash needs, and the Company may from time
to time borrow additional funds under the Credit Facility to provide funding for such payments.

Management believes that the Company will have adequate cash flow to meet its ongoing operational needs,
including required repayments under the Credit Facility, based upon its estimates of future revenues and
expenditures, which include assumptions regarding (i) revenues for assets to be re-leased, (ii) required debt
payments, (iii) interest rates, (iv) the cost and anticipated timing of maintenance to be performed and (v) timely use
of proceeds of unused debt capacity toward additional acquisitions of income producing assets.

Although the Company believes that the assumptions it has made in forecasting its cash flow are reasonable in light
of experience, actual results could deviate from such assumptions. Among the more significant factors that could
have an impact on the accuracy of cash flow assumptions are (i) lessee non-performance or non-compliance with
lease obligations, (ii) inability to locate new lessees for returned equipment within a reasonable remarketing period,
or at a rent level consistent with projected rental rates for the asset, (iii) lessee performance of maintenance, and
payment of related maintenance claims, earlier than anticipated, (iv) inability to locate and acquire a sufficient
volume of additional assets at prices that will produce acceptable net returns, (v) an increase in interest rates and (vi)
any one or a combination of the above factors that causes the Company to violate covenants of the Credit Facility
agreement, which may in turn require repayment of some or all of the amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility.

(i)

Operating activities

The Company’s cash flow from operations decreased by $1,714,800 in 2011 compared to 2010. As discussed
below, the change in cash flow was primarily a result of decreases in payments received for rent and security
deposits and an increase in payments for aircraft insurance, the effects of which were partially offset by decreases in
expenditures for maintenance, interest, and professional fees and general and administrative expenses.

Payments for operating lease revenue and security deposits

Several assets that were on lease in 2010 were off lease for all or part of 2011. In addition, the lessee for two of the
Company’s aircraft was in arrears in its obligations to the Company at the end of 2011. As a result, payments
received from lessees for rent decreased by $3,262,300 in 2011 compared to 2010.

The Company currently is receiving no lease revenue for its off-lease assets, comprised of three Fokker 100 and one
Saab 340-B aircraft.

The Company received $676,100 less for security deposits in 2011 compared to 2010. The decrease was primarily
due to funds received when the Company drew on a letter of credit that served as security for two aircraft leases that
were terminated in early 2010 as a result of the lessee’s bankruptcy. The security deposit was used to partially fund
maintenance required by the return conditions of the leases.

Payments for maintenance

Payments for maintenance decreased by $1,228,300 in 2011 compared to 2010 as a result of a decrease in
maintenance on off-lease aircraft, as well as a decrease in amounts reimbursed to lessees for maintenance reserves
claims. The amount of payments for maintenance in future periods will depend on the amount and timing of
maintenance paid as reimbursement to lessees for maintenance reserves claims, which are dependent upon
utilization and required maintenance intervals, and maintenance paid for off-lease assets.

Payments for interest

Payments for interest decreased by $1,337,900 in 2011, compared to 2010, primarily as a result of (i) a lower
average Subordinated Notes balance as a result of repayments and (ii) the use of longer-term LIBOR financing for a
portion of the Company’s Credit Facility indebtedness in the fourth quarter of 2011, for which interest was accrued
but was not payable until the loans matured in January 2012.

Payments for professional fees, general and administrative expenses and aircraft insurance

Payments for professional fees and general and administrative expenses decreased by $266,900 in 2011 compared to
2010, primarily as a result of lower expenditures for legal costs in 2011 related to the Company’s Credit Facility,
which commenced in 2010. Payments for aircraft insurance increased by $398,600 in 2011 compared to 2010
because more of the Company’s aircraft were off lease in 2011.

(ii)

Investing activities

During 2011, the Company received cash of $2,101,500 from the sale of two aircraft and $1,699,900 from the
collection of insurance proceeds for the loss of an aircraft. The Company used cash of $7,521,400 for the purchase
of two aircraft and for equipment that was installed on several aircraft and for acquisition costs related to an aircraft
purchased in December 2010, as well as for an engine maintenance contract related to the Company’s Bombardier
Dash-8-Q400, which was purchased in December 2010 and leased in August 2011.

During 2010, the Company received cash of $2,789,900 from the collection of insurance proceeds for (i) an aircraft
that was damaged and declared a total loss in January 2010 and (ii) an engine that was damaged in late 2009.
During 2010, the Company used cash of $9,098,900 for the purchase of an aircraft, equipment that was installed on
several aircraft and for acquisition costs related to aircraft engines purchased in the fourth quarter of 2009.

(iii)

Financing activities

The Company borrowed $6,500,000 and $13,000,000 under the Credit Facility during 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Company repaid $6,643,500 and $10,618,500 of its total outstanding debt in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Such
payments were funded by excess cash flow.

Outlook

(a)

General

The recent global downturn resulted in a significant reduction in airline passenger volume and, in reaction to that, a
reduction in the number of aircraft and aircraft engines needed for operation by carriers in nearly all geographic
areas, especially Europe. The slow recovery from this downturn and the current European financial crisis have
created a challenging environment for the Company in three respects:

(cid:78)

The global economic situation has increased the possibility of an unanticipated lessee default, particularly
by the Company’s less-established carriers. A lessee’s default and the unscheduled return of an asset to the
Company for remarketing could result not only in reduced operating lease revenue but also in
unanticipated, unrecoverable expenses arising from the lessee’s default on its maintenance and return
condition obligations. The Company monitors the performance of all of its customers and continues to note
indications of weakened financial conditions and operating results for the majority of its customers.

The reduction in demand for aircraft and aircraft engines has increased the possibility that the Company’s
current lessees will choose to return leased assets at lease expiration rather than renew the existing leases,
notwithstanding that any such lessee may incur significant expenses to satisfy return conditions. Due to
decreased demand for aircraft capacity, it is likely that the Company will experience lower on-lease
utilization rates and longer lead times for remarketing of returned assets, as well as lower rental rates for
remarketed assets, as was the case with several lease extensions and re-leases in 2010 and 2011. This trend
is expected to continue to affect the Company’s operating revenue in 2012.

Finally, the downturn also has created fewer opportunities for acquisitions for the Company. The
Company’s customers are generally carriers needing additional aircraft to expand their route systems or
increase frequencies. In the current environment of reduced demand for air travel and consequently
reduced capacity by carriers, there is likely to be a significant decrease in the pool of such customers
requiring aircraft. Therefore, it is possible that the Company’s portfolio growth will continue to be slow, as
fewer carriers seek to expand their fleets.

(b)

Remarketing Efforts

(i) Assets currently off lease

As of March 9, 2012, the Company is seeking release opportunities for the following of its assets that are off lease:

(cid:78)

Three Fokker 100 aircraft, which were returned to the Company prior to lease expiration in 2010; and

One Saab 340B aircraft, which was returned at lease expiration in March 2011.

The Company has incurred significant maintenance expenses in order to prepare its off-lease assets for lease to new
customers. Although the Company believes it has incurred the majority of such expenses, it is possible that
additional maintenance expenses will be incurred when new customers are identified for the Company’s remaining
off-lease assets. The amount of such maintenance could exceed the amount of reserves previously collected for the
assets.

(ii) Upcoming lease expirations

Unless they are renewed, leases for four of the Company’s assets will expire in the first half of 2012. The customers
for two of the assets have indicated their intent to extend the applicable leases.

(c)

Credit Facility

The Company believes that the availability under the Credit Facility should be sufficient to fund its anticipated asset
acquisitions through the end of 2012. The term of the current Credit Facility will expire in April 2013, and the
Company anticipates will need to negotiate an extension or a replacement of the Credit Facility by that date.

Although the Company believes it will be in compliance with the covenants of the Credit Facility in 2012, as
discussed below in “Factors that May Affect Future Results – Credit Facility Obligations,” there can be no
assurance of such compliance. Any default under the Credit Facility, if not waived by the lenders, could result in
foreclosure upon any or all of the existing assets of the Company.

(d)

Deferral Agreements

Beginning in 2009, the Company granted deferral of certain overdue and/or future rental or reserves payment
obligations pursuant to agreements with certain customers that had experienced financial difficulties. The Company
currently has no deferral agreement balances outstanding. One of the Company’s customers, with which the
Company previously had a deferral agreement, has made timely payments to the Company since August 2011
following a change in management. At December 31, 2011, the Company had an allowance for doubtful accounts in
the amount of $1,924,400 for the amounts owed by that customer in excess of the security deposits held by the
Company. In January 2012, the Company and that customer signed a memorandum of understanding regarding the
arrearages owed to the Company. The memorandum of understanding calls for 50% of the arrearages to be paid
over time, with the remaining 50% forgiven by the Company upon receipt of all arrearage payments.

Although beginning in 2009 the Company agreed with several lessees to defer certain payments, based on its
evaluation of its current customers, the Company does not anticipate any trend developing that will result in
additional deferral agreements in 2012.

Factors that May Affect Future Results

Credit Facility Obligations. The total amount of borrowing under the credit facility is limited to a percentage of the
collateral base, and assets that come off lease and remain off-lease for a period of time may reduce the collateral
base. Past due lease payments may also affect an asset’s eligibility for inclusion in the collateral base, and the credit
facility agreement places certain limits on the use of deferral agreements to mitigate such arrearages for purposes of
inclusion of the subject asset in the collateral base. The Company believes it will have sufficient cash funds to make

any required principal repayment that arises due to any such collateral base limitations. At September 30, 2011, the
Company was out of compliance with one of its financial ratio covenants, but received a waiver from its lenders for
such non-compliance. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at the December 31, 2011 measurement
date. Although the Company believes, based in part on certain assumptions discussed below, that it will continue to
be in compliance with the covenants of the Credit Facility, there can be no assurance that the Company’s
assumptions will be correct, and if not, the Company will need to seek further waivers from its lenders. Any default
under the Credit Facility, if not waived by the lenders, could result in foreclosure upon any or all of the existing
assets of the Company.

The Company’s beliefs regarding compliance with its credit facility covenants are based on certain assumptions
regarding the timing of the incurrence of maintenance expense, remarketing of off-lease assets within the time
period anticipated by the Company, certain lease renewals, interest rate levels, the Company’s profitability, lessee
defaults or bankruptcies, and certain other matters that the Company deems reasonable in light of its experience in
the industry (See “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Cash flow,” above). There can be no assurance that the
Company’s assumptions will prove to be correct. If the assumptions are incorrect (for example, if the Company’s
off-lease aircraft are not re-leased in the time period currently anticipated by the Company as described in “Outlook
– (c) Credit Facility”) and the Company has not obtained an applicable waiver or amendment of applicable
covenants from its lenders to mitigate the situation, the Company may have to sell a significant portion of its
portfolio in order to avoid or cure a default under the Credit Facility agreement.

Risks of Debt Financing. The Company’s use of debt as the primary form of acquisition financing subjects the
Company to increased risks associated with leveraging. Indebtedness owed under the Credit Facility carries a higher
cost of capital relative to equity financing, resulting in relatively higher expense and reduced free cash flow. The
Company’s assets secure its debt financing. In addition to payment obligations, the Credit Facility also requires the
Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including a requirement of positive earnings and compliance
with interest coverage ratios and required net worth. Any default under the Credit Facility, if not waived by the
lenders, could result in foreclosure upon any or all of the existing assets of the Company. In addition, the term of
the current Credit Facility will expire in April 2013, and the Company will need to negotiate an extension or a
replacement of the Credit Facility by that date, and there can be no assurance of any such extension or replacement.

General Economic Conditions and Lowered Demand for Travel. The Company’s business is dependent upon
general economic conditions and the strength of the travel and transportation industry. The industry is continuing to
experience financial difficulty and contraction due to the protracted downturn in the global economy. Passenger
volume has fallen significantly for carriers, and the loss of revenue has affected many carriers’ financial condition.
The ongoing credit crisis has made it difficult or impossible for many regional carriers to find the additional debt
financing on which they have traditionally relied. The confluence of these economic factors increases the likelihood
of failures among the Company’s customers. The spread of a disease epidemic, the threat or execution of a terrorist
attack against aviation, a worsening financial/bank crisis in Europe, a natural event that interrupts air traffic (such as
the 2010 Iceland volcano eruption), political crises or other events that cause a prolonged spike in fuel prices, or
other like events could exacerbate an already weakened condition and lead to widespread failures in the air carrier
industry. If lessees experience financial difficulties and are unable to meet lease obligations, this will, in turn,
negatively affect the Company’s financial performance.

During the current period of economic contraction, many airlines have reduced capacity in response to lower
passenger loads, and as a result, there has been reduced demand for aircraft and aircraft engines and a corresponding
decrease in market lease rental rates and aircraft values for many aircraft types. This reduced market value could
affect the Company’s results if the market value of an asset or assets in the Company’s portfolio falls below carrying
value, and the Company determines that a write-down of the value on its balance sheet is appropriate. Furthermore,
if older, expiring leases are replaced with leases at decreased lease rates, the lease revenue from the Company’s
existing portfolio is likely to decline, with the magnitude of the decline dependent on the length of the downturn and
the depth of the decline in market rents.

Economic downturns can affect certain regions of the world more than others. As the Company’s portfolio is not
entirely globally diversified, a localized downturn in one of the key regions in which the Company leases assets
could have a significant adverse impact on the Company. Currently, 34%, 23%, 18%, 12% and 11% of the
Company’s lease revenue comes from the European, Caribbean, Asian, African and North American regions,

respectively, with, with six, two, two, three and four lessees, respectively. Therefore, Europe is currently the most
significant market to the Company and a regional downturn that affects the financial health of European regional
carriers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial results. In that respect, the current
European financial crisis and its potential impact on the European economy is a substantial area of concern for the
Company.

Over the last few years, several of the Company’s customers have experienced financial difficulties arising from a
combination of the weakened air carrier market and their own unique financial circumstances and have requested
and been granted deferral of certain overdue and/or future rental or reserve payment obligations. If the current
weakened air carrier environment continues, it is possible that the Company may enter into additional deferral
agreements. When a customer requests a deferral of lease obligations, the Company evaluates the lessee’s financial
plan, the likelihood that the lessee can remain a viable carrier, and whether the deferral will be repaid according to
the agreed schedule. If the Company feels that there is a risk that deferred obligations will not be repaid, the
Company records the rent and reserve payments from the applicable lessee on a cash basis. If the Company makes a
judgment that the lessee is likely to meet its deferred obligations, the Company continues to record the deferred
rental and reserve payments as revenue in the periods in which they accrue. It is possible that a lessee that the
Company judges to be likely to repay its deferred obligations could experience a worsening financial condition. In
that circumstance, the Company may determine that full repayment of the deferred obligations is no longer likely, in
which case the Company would record a bad debt expense or reduction of income. This could have a material effect
on the Company’s financial results in the period that such bad debt expense or income reduction is recorded.

Availability of Financing. The Company believes that the availability of financing under the Credit Facility will be
sufficient to fund projected acquisitions through the end of 2012. The Credit Facility term was recently extended for
one year to April 2013. The Company will either need to negotiate a longer-term facility with the current syndicate
of lenders or a replacement group within the coming year, or seek another short-term extension of the current Credit
Facility on its existing terms. In the longer term, however, the Company’s continued growth will depend on its
ability to obtain capital, either through debt or equity financings. The financial markets have experienced significant
setbacks that have made access to capital more costly and difficult. As a result, commercial lending origination has
dramatically decreased, and asset-based debt financing remains difficult to obtain. There is no assurance that the
Company will succeed in finding additional funding, and if such financing is found, it may be on terms less
favorable than the Company’s current debt financings.

Ownership Risks. Nearly all of the Company’s portfolio is leased under operating leases. The term of a lease is
typically less than the entire anticipated remaining useful life of the leased asset. The Company’s ability to recover
its purchase investment in an asset subject to such a lease is dependent upon the Company’s ability to profitably re-
lease or sell the asset after the expiration of the initial lease term. Some of the factors that have an impact on the
Company’s ability to re-lease or sell the asset include worldwide economic conditions, general aircraft market
conditions, regulatory changes that may make an asset’s use more expensive or preclude use unless the asset is
modified, changes in the supply or cost of aircraft equipment and technological developments that cause the asset to
become obsolete. If the Company is unable to remarket its assets on favorable terms when the leases for such assets
expire, the Company’s business, financial condition, cash flow, ability to service debt and results of operations could
be adversely affected.

In addition, a successful investment in an asset subject to a lease depends in part upon having the asset returned by
the lessee in the condition as required under the lease. Each lease typically obligates a customer to return an asset to
the Company in a specified condition, which generally requires it be returned in equal or better condition than at
delivery to the lessee. If the lessee becomes insolvent during the term of its lease and the Company has to repossess
the asset from the lessee, it is unlikely that the lessee will have the financial ability to meet these return obligations
and it is likely that the Company would be required to expend funds in excess of the maintenance reserves collected
to return the asset to a remarketable condition.

Several of the Company’s leases do not require payment of monthly maintenance reserves, which serve as the
lessee’s advance payment for its future repair and maintenance obligations. If repossession due to lessee default
occurs under such a lease, the Company will be left with the expense for the costs of unperformed repair and
maintenance under the applicable lease and the Company may incur an unanticipated expense in order to re-lease the
asset.

Furthermore, the occurrence of unexpected adverse changes that impact the Company’s estimates of expected cash
flows generated from an asset may result in an asset impairment charge against the Company’s earnings. The
Company periodically reviews long-term assets for impairment, in particular, when events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized
when the carrying amount of an asset is estimated to be not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The Company
may be required to recognize asset impairment charges in the future as a result of a prolonged weak economic
environment, challenging market conditions in the airline industry or events related to particular lessees, assets or
asset types.

Lessee Credit Risk. The Company carefully evaluates the credit risk of each customer and attempts to obtain a third
party guaranty, letters of credit or other credit enhancements, if it deems them necessary in addition to customary
security deposits. There can be no assurance, however, that such enhancements will be available, or that, if
obtained, will fully protect the Company from losses resulting from a lessee default or bankruptcy.

If a lessee that is a certified U.S. airline were in default under a lease and sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code, Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code would automatically prevent the Company
from exercising any remedies against such lessee for a period of 60 days. After the 60-day period had passed, the
lessee would have to agree to perform the lease obligations and cure any defaults, or the Company would have the
right to repossess the equipment. This procedure under the Bankruptcy Code has been subject to significant
litigation, however, and it is possible that the Company’s enforcement rights may be further adversely affected by a
declaration of bankruptcy by a defaulting lessee.

Most of the Company’s current and expected growth is expected outside of the United States, and non-U.S. lessees
are not subject to U.S. bankruptcy laws, although there may be debtor protection similar to U.S. bankruptcy laws
available in some jurisdictions. In any event, collection and enforcement may be more difficult and complicated in
foreign countries.

Since 2009, the Company has seen indications of a weakening in both the financial condition and operating results
of the majority of its customers, and several of the Company’s customers have experienced financial difficulties.
The Company closely monitors the performance of all of its lessees. If any of the Company’s current or future
lessees becomes unable to meet their lease obligations, the Company's future results could be materially and
adversely impacted.

Concentration of Lessees and Aircraft Type. For the month ended February 29, 2012, based on monthly operating
lease revenue and interest income from finance leases, the Company’s three largest customers were located in
Antigua, Germany and Norway and accounted for a total of approximately 39% of the Company’s monthly lease
revenue. A lease default by or collection problem with one or a combination of any of these significant customers
could have a disproportionate negative impact on the Company’s financial results and collateral base under the
Credit Facility, and, therefore, the Company’s operating results are especially sensitive to any negative
developments with respect to these customers in terms of lease compliance or collection. Such concentration of
lessee credit risk decreases as the Company leases additional assets to new lessees.

As of February 29, 2012, the Company owned seven Fokker 100, nine Bombardier Dash-8-300 and fourteen Fokker
50 aircraft, making these three aircraft types the dominant types in the portfolio and representing 26%, 28% and
17%, respectively, of net book value. As a result, a change in the desirability and availability of any of these types
of aircraft, which would in turn affect valuations of such aircraft, would have a disproportionately significant impact
on the Company’s portfolio value. Such aircraft type concentration will diminish if the Company acquires additional
assets of other types. Conversely, acquisition of these types of aircraft will increase the Company’s risks related to
its concentration of those aircraft types.

Risks Related to Regional Air Carriers. The Company’s continued focus on its customer base of regional air
carriers subjects the Company to additional risks. Some of the lessees in the regional air carrier market are
companies that are start-up, low-capital, and/or low-margin operators. Often, the success of such carriers depends
on contractual arrangements with major trunk carriers or franchises from governmental agencies that provide

subsidies for operating essential air routes, both of which may be subject to termination or cancellation with short
notice periods.

Investment in New Aircraft Types and Engines. The Company intends to continue to focus solely on regional
aircraft and engines. Although the Company has traditionally invested in a limited number of types of turboprop
aircraft and engines, the Company has also acquired several Fokker 100 regional jet aircraft and regional jet aircraft
engines, and may continue to seek acquisition opportunities for new types and models of regional jet and turboprop
aircraft and engines used in the Company’s targeted customer base of regional air carriers. Acquisition of aircraft
types and engines not previously acquired by the Company entails greater ownership risk due to the Company's lack
of experience managing those aircraft and engine types. The Company believes, however, that the overall industry
experience of JMC’s personnel and its technical resources should permit the Company to effectively manage such
new aircraft types and engines. Further, the broadening of the asset types in the aircraft portfolio may have a benefit
of diversifying the Company’s portfolio (see “Factors That May Affect Future Results – Concentration of Lessees
and Aircraft Type,” above).

Leasing Risks. The Company’s successful negotiation of lease extensions, re-leases and sales is critical to achieving
its financial objectives and involves a number of risks. Demand for lease or purchase of the assets depends on the
economic condition of the airline industry, which is, in turn, sensitive to general economic conditions. The ability to
re-lease equipment at acceptable rates may depend on the demand and market values at the time of remarketing.
The Company acquires used aircraft equipment. The market for used aircraft equipment has been cyclical, and
generally reflects economic conditions and the strength of the travel and transportation industry. The demand for
and value of many types of used aircraft in the recent past has been depressed by such factors as airline financial
difficulties, increased fuel costs, the number of new aircraft on order and the number of aircraft coming off lease.
Values may also increase for certain aircraft types that become desirable based on market conditions and changing
airline capacity. If the Company were to purchase an aircraft during a period of increasing values, it would in turn
need to lease such aircraft at a corresponding higher lease rate to compensate for its higher purchase price.

Engine Leasing Risk. The Company currently has three engines in its portfolio, making up 8% of the Company’s
total aircraft and aircraft engines net book value. The Company may from time to time lease one or more of these
engines under industry standard short-term engine leases, which place the risk of an engine failure not caused by
lessee negligence or foreign object damage upon the lessor. It is not economically practicable for an engine lessor to
insure against that risk. If an engine failure occurs and is not covered by a manufacturer’s warranty or caused by
circumstances that under its lease the lessee is required to cover, the Company’s investment in the engine could be a
significant loss.

Interest Rate Risk. The Credit Facility carries a floating interest rate based upon short-term interest rate indices.
Lease rates typically, but not always, move over time with interest rates, but market demand and numerous other
asset-specific factors also affect lease rates. Because the Company’s typical lease rates are fixed at the origination of
leases, interest rate changes during the term of a lease have no effect on existing lease rental payments. Therefore, if
interest rates rise significantly and there is relatively little lease origination by the Company following such rate
increases, the Company could experience decreased net income as additional interest expense outpaces revenue
growth. Further, even if significant lease origination occurs following such rate increases, other contemporaneous
aircraft market forces may result in lower or flat rental rates, thereby decreasing net income.

International Risks. The Company leases assets primarily in overseas markets. Leases with foreign lessees,
however, may present different risks than those with domestic lessees.

Foreign laws, regulations and judicial procedures may be more or less protective of lessor rights than those that
apply in the United States. The Company could experience collection or repossession problems related to the
enforcement of its lease agreements under foreign local laws and remedies in foreign jurisdictions. The protections
potentially offered by Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code do not apply to non-U.S. carriers, and applicable local
law may not offer similar protections. Certain countries do not have a central registration or recording system with
which to locally establish the Company’s interest in equipment and related leases. This could make it more difficult
for the Company to recover an aircraft in the event of a default by a foreign lessee.

A lease with a foreign lessee is subject to risks related to the economy of the country or region in which such lessee
is located, which may be weaker than the U.S. economy. An economic downturn in a particular country or region
may impact a foreign lessee’s ability to make lease payments, even if the U.S. and other foreign economies remain
stable.

In addition, foreign lessees are subject to risks related to currency conversion fluctuations. Although the Company’s
current leases are all payable in U.S. dollars, the Company may agree in the future to leases that permit payment in
foreign currency, which would subject such lease revenue to monetary risk due to currency fluctuations. In addition,
if the Company undertakes certain obligations under a lease to contribute to a repair or improvement and if the work
is performed in a foreign jurisdiction and paid for in foreign currency, currency fluctuations causing a weaker dollar
between the time such agreement is made and the time payment for the work is made may result in an unanticipated
increase in U.S. dollar-denominated cost for the Company.

Even with U.S. dollar-denominated lease payment provisions, the Company could still be affected by a devaluation
of the lessee’s local currency that would make it more difficult for a lessee to meet its U.S. dollar-denominated
payments, increasing the risk of default of that lessee, particularly if its revenue is primarily derived in the local
currency.

Foreign lessees that operate internationally may also face restrictions on repatriating foreign revenue to their home
country. This could create a cash flow crisis for an otherwise profitable carrier, affecting its ability to meet its lease
obligations.

Finally, ownership of a leased asset operating in a foreign country and/or by a foreign carrier may subject the
Company to additional tax liabilities that are not present with aircraft operated in the United States. Depending on
the jurisdiction, laws governing such tax liabilities may be complex, not well formed or not uniformly enforced. In
such jurisdictions, the Company may decide to take an uncertain tax position based on the best advice of the local
tax experts it engages, which position may be challenged by the taxing authority. If the taxing authority later
assesses a liability, the Company may be required to pay penalties and interest on the assessed amount, which
penalties and interest would not give rise to a corresponding foreign tax credit on the Company’s U.S. tax return.

Reliance on JMC. All management of the Company is performed by JMC under a Management Agreement between
the Company and JMC, which is in the fifteenth year of a 20-year term and provides for an asset-based management
fee. JMC is not a fiduciary to the Company or its stockholders. The Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”)
has ultimate control and supervisory responsibility over all aspects of the Company and owes fiduciary duties to the
Company and its stockholders. The Board has no control over the internal operations of JMC, but the Board does
have the ability and responsibility to manage the Company’s relationship with JMC and the performance of JMC's
obligations to the Company under the Management Agreement, as it would have for any third party service provider
to the Company. While JMC may not owe any fiduciary duties to the Company by virtue of the Management
Agreement, all of the officers of JMC are also officers of the Company, and in that capacity owe fiduciary duties to
the Company and its stockholders. In addition, certain officers of the Company hold significant ownership positions
in the Company and JHC, the parent company of JMC.

The Management Agreement may be terminated if JMC defaults on its obligations to the Company. However, the
agreement provides for liquidated damages in the event of its wrongful termination by the Company. Certain
directors of the Company are also directors of JMC and, as discussed above, the officers of the Company are also
officers of JMC and certain officers hold significant ownership positions in both the Company and JHC, the holding
company for JMC. Consequently, the directors and officers of JMC may have a conflict of interest in the event of a
dispute between the Company and JMC. Although the Company has taken steps to prevent conflicts of interest
arising from such dual roles, such conflicts may still occur.

JMC has acted as the management company for two other aircraft portfolio owners, JetFleet III, which raised
approximately $13,000,000 in bond issuance proceeds, and AeroCentury IV, Inc. (“AeroCentury IV”), which raised
approximately $5,000,000 in bond issuance proceeds. In the first quarter of 2002, " IV defaulted on certain bond
obligations. In June 2002, the indenture trustee for AeroCentury IV’s bondholders repossessed AeroCentury IV’s
assets and took over management of AeroCentury IV’s remaining assets. JetFleet III defaulted on its bond

obligation of $11,076,400 in May 2004. The indenture trustee for JetFleet III bondholders repossessed JetFleet III’s
unsold assets in late May 2004.

Management Fee Structure. All decisions regarding acquisitions and disposal of aircraft from the Company’s
portfolio are made by JMC. JMC is paid a management fee based on the net asset value of the Company’s
portfolio. It may also receive a one-time asset acquisition fee upon purchase of an asset by the Company, and a one-
time remarketing fee in connection with the sale or re-lease of an asset. Optimization of the results of the Company
depends on timing of the acquisition, lease yield on the acquired assets, and re-lease or sale of its portfolio
assets. Under the current management fee structure, a larger volume of acquisitions generates acquisition fees and
also increases the periodic management fee by increasing the size of the aircraft portfolio. Since the Company’s
current business strategy involves continued growth of its portfolio and a “buy and hold” strategy, a compensation
structure that results in greater compensation with an increased portfolio size is not inherently inconsistent with that
strategy. The compensation structure does, nonetheless, create a situation where a decision by JMC for the
Company to forego an asset transaction deemed to be an unacceptable business risk due to the lessee or the aircraft
type is in conflict with JMC’s own pecuniary interest. As a result, the compensation structure could act to incent
greater risk-taking by JMC in asset acquisition decision-making. All acquisition decisions by JMC on behalf of the
Company, however, currently require Credit Facility lender approval of the asset acquired and the lessee in order to
be included in the Credit Facility collateral base, and the Company has established objective target guidelines for
yields on acquired assets. Further, the Company’s Board, including a majority of the outside independent directors,
must approve any acquisition that involves a new asset type. While the Company currently believes the foregoing
are effective mitigating factors against undue compensation-incented risk-taking by JMC, there is no assurance that
such mechanisms can entirely and effectively eliminate such risk.

Government Regulation. There are a number of areas in which government regulation may result in costs to the
Company. These include aircraft registration, safety requirements, required equipment modifications and aircraft
noise requirements. Although it is contemplated that the burden and cost of complying with such requirements will
fall primarily upon lessees of equipment, there can be no assurance that the cost will not fall on the Company.
Furthermore, future government regulations could cause the value of any non-complying equipment owned by the
Company to decline substantially.

Competition. The aircraft leasing industry is highly competitive. The Company competes with aircraft
manufacturers, distributors, airlines and other operators, equipment managers, leasing companies, equipment leasing
programs, financial institutions and other parties engaged in leasing, managing or remarketing aircraft, many of
which have significantly greater financial resources. Nevertheless, the Company believes that it is competitive
because of JMC’s experience and operational efficiency in identifying and obtaining financing for the transaction
types desired by regional air carriers. This market segment, which is characterized by transaction sizes of less than
$10 million and in many cases privately-held customers without well-established third party credit ratings, is not
well served by the Company’s larger competitors. JMC has developed a reputation as a global participant in this
segment of the market, and the Company believes that JMC’s reputation benefits the Company. There is, however,
no assurance that competition from larger aircraft leasing companies will not increase significantly or that JMC’s
reputation will continue to be strong in this market segment.

Casualties, Insurance Coverage. The Company, as owner of transportation equipment, may be named in a suit
claiming damages for injuries or damage to property caused by its assets. As a triple-net lessor, the Company is
generally protected against such claims, since the lessee would be responsible for, insure against and indemnify the
Company for such claims. The Company defines an “operating lease” as a lease with a term that is less than the
useful life of the asset. A “triple net operating lease” is an operating lease under which, in addition to monthly rental
payments, the lessee is generally responsible for the taxes, insurance and maintenance and repair of the aircraft
arising from the use and operation of the aircraft during the term of the lease. Although the United States Aviation
Act may provide some protection with respect to the Company’s aircraft assets, it is unclear to what extent such
statutory protection would be available to the Company with respect to most of the Company’s assets, which are
operated in foreign countries where such provisions of the United States Aviation Act may not apply.

The Company’s leases generally require a lessee to insure against likely risks of loss or damage to the leased asset,
and liability to passengers and third parties pursuant to industry standard insurance policies and require lessees to
provide insurance certificates documenting the policy periods and coverage amounts. The Company tracks receipt

of the certificates and calendars their expiration dates. Prior to the expiration of an insurance certificate, if a
replacement certificate has not been received, the Company reminds the lessee of its obligation to provide current
insurance certificates.

Despite these requirements and procedures, there may be certain cases where the loss is not entirely covered by the
lessee or its insurance. The possibility of such an event is remote, but any such uninsured loss with respect to the
equipment or insured loss for which insurance proceeds are inadequate might result in a loss of invested capital in
and any profits anticipated from, such equipment, as well as a potential claim directly against the Company.

Compliance With Future Environmental Regulations. Compliance with future environmental regulations may harm
the Company’s business. Many aspects of aircraft operations are subject to increasingly stringent environmental
regulations, and growing concerns about climate change may result in the imposition by the U.S and foreign
governments of additional regulation of carbon emissions, aimed at either requiring adoption of technology to
reduce the amount of carbon emissions or putting in place a fee or tax system on carbon emitters. It is likely that
any such regulation will be directed at the Company’s customers, as operators of aircraft, or at the Company, as
owners of aircraft. Under the Company’s triple-net arrangements, the Company would likely shift responsibility for
compliance to its lessees, but there might be some costs of regulation that the Company could not shift and would
itself have to bear. Although it is not expected that the costs of complying with current environmental regulations
will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, no
assurance can be given that the costs of complying with environmental regulations adopted in the future will not
have such an effect.

Cyber-Security Risks. The Company believes that it has sufficient cyber-security measures in place commensurate
with the risks to the Company of a successful cyber-attack or breach of security. The Company’s main vulnerability
to a cyber-attack would be interruption of the Company’s email communications internally and with third parties,
and loss of document sharing between the Company’s offices and remote workers. Such an attack could temporarily
impede the efficiency of the Company’s operations; however, the Company believes that sufficient replacement
mechanisms exist in the event of such an interruption that there would not be a material adverse financial impact on
the Company’s business.

Warrant Issuance. As part of the Subordinated Notes financing, warrants were issued to the holders of Subordinated
Notes to purchase up to 81,224 shares of the Company’s common stock that are currently exercisable and represent
approximately 5% of the post-exercise fully diluted capitalization of the Company. The exercise price under the
warrants is $8.75 per share. If the warrants to purchase shares are exercised at a time when the exercise price is less
than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock, there will be dilution to the existing holders of common
stock. This dilution of the Company’s common stock could depress its trading price.

Possible Volatility of Stock Price. The market price of the Company’s common stock may be subject to fluctuations
following developments relating to the Company’s operating results, changes in general conditions in the economy,
the financial markets, the airline industry, changes in accounting principles or tax laws applicable to the Company or
its lessees, or other developments affecting the Company, its customers or its competitors, or arising from other
investor sentiment unknown to the Company. Because the Company has a relatively small capitalization of
approximately 1.5 million shares outstanding, there is a correspondingly limited amount of trading and float of the
Company’s shares. Consequently, the Company’s stock price is more sensitive to a single large trade or a small
number of simultaneous trades along the same trend than a company with larger capitalization and higher trading
volume and float.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

This report does not include information described under Item 305 of Regulation S-K pursuant to the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission that permit “smaller reporting companies” to omit such information.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

(a)

Financial Statements and Schedules

(1)

Financial statements for the Company:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
Notes to Financial Statements

(2)

Schedules:

All schedules have been omitted since the required information is presented in the financial
statements or is not applicable.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
AeroCentury Corp.
Burlingame, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of AeroCentury Corp. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011
and 2010 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were
we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of AeroCentury Corp. at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the two years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.

March 9, 2012
San Francisco, California

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

AeroCentury Corp.
Balance Sheets

ASSETS

Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, including deferred rent of $1,923,300 and $1,054,400,

net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,924,400 and $0 at

December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
Finance lease receivable
Aircraft and aircraft engines held for lease, net of accumulated
depreciation of $48,935,200 and $47,185,900 at
December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
Prepaid expenses and other

December 31, December 31,

2011

2010

$ 995,500

$ 1,949,400

2,936,100
1,271,400

2,005,000
-

124,245,000
1,378,000

126,822,600
2,234,300

$130,826,000

$133,011,300

Total assets

Liabilities:

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Notes payable and accrued interest
Maintenance reserves and accrued maintenance costs
Security deposits
Unearned revenues
Deferred income taxes
Taxes payable

Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, 1,606,557 shares issued and outstanding
Paid-in capital
Retained earnings

Treasury stock at cost, 63,300 shares

Total stockholders’ equity

$ 368,100
65,672,700
5,814,700
5,607,300
558,200
12,094,400
20,400

$ 627,800
65,375,500
6,861,900
4,661,800
577,200
12,766,500
-

90,135,800

90,870,700

1,600
14,780,100
26,412,600
41,194,300
(504,100)

1,600
14,780,100
27,863,000
42,644,700
(504,100)

40,690,200

42,140,600

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$130,826,000

$133,011,300

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

AeroCentury Corp.
Statements of Operations

Revenues and other income:

Operating lease revenue, net
Maintenance reserves revenue, net
Gain on disposal of assets
Other income
Recovery of bad debt

Expenses:

Maintenance
Depreciation
Interest
Management fees
Professional fees, general and administrative and other
Insurance
Other taxes

For the Years Ended December 31,

2011

2010

$19,403,900
3,340,100
1,371,000
437,700
-

$22,766,200
7,080,900
416,000
229,500
208,000

24,552,700

30,700,600

10,933,700
5,598,900
3,934,800
3,715,400
1,333,400
878,900
90,200

11,172,500
7,395,700
4,298,600
3,644,800
1,012,500
562,000
90,100

26,485,300

28,176,200

(Loss)/income before income tax provision

(1,932,600)

2,524,400

Income tax (benefit)/provision

(482,200)

876,300

Net (loss)/income

(Loss)/earnings per share:
Basic

Diluted
Weighted average shares used in (loss)/earnings per share computations:
Basic
Diluted

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

$(1,450,400)

$ 1,648,100

$ (0.94)

$ 1.07

$ (0.94)

$ 1.04

1,543,257
1,543,257

1,543,257
1,584,464

AeroCentury Corp.
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Common
Stock

Paid-in
Capital

Retained
Earnings

Treasury
Stock

Total

Balance, December 31, 2009

$1,600

$14,780,100

$26,214,900

$(504,100)

$40,492,500

Net income

1,648,100

Balance, December 31, 2010

1,600

14,780,100

27,863,000

(504,100)

42,140,600

Net loss

(1,450,400)

Balance, December 31, 2011

$1,600

$14,780,100

$26,412,600

$(504,100)

$40,690,200

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

AeroCentury Corp.
Statements of Cash Flows

Operating activities:
Net (loss)/income
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Gain on disposal of assets
Depreciation
Non-cash interest
Non-cash income
Provision for bad debts, net of recoveries
Deferred taxes
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
Finance lease receivable
Taxes receivable
Prepaid expenses and other
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Accrued interest on notes payable
Maintenance reserves and accrued costs
Security deposits
Prepaid rent
Taxes payable
Net cash provided by operating activities

Investing activities:

Proceeds from sale of aircraft and aircraft engine, net of re-sale fees
Proceeds from insurance
Purchases of aircraft and aircraft engines

Net cash used in investing activities

Financing activities:

Borrowings under Credit Facility
Repayments of Credit Facility

Repayments of Subordinated Notes
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities

For the Years Ended December 31,

2011

2010

$(1,450,400)

$1,648,100

(1,371,000)
5,598,900
1,338,900
-
-
(672,100)

(928,900)
225,200
6,000
(152,200)
(194,400)
349,900
(889,800)
1,048,100
(19,000)
20,400
2,909,600

2,101,500
1,699,900
(7,521,400)
(3,720,000)

6,500,000
(4,300,000)
(2,343,500)
(143,500)

(416,000)
7,395,700
1,270,600
(8,000)
75,800
778,800

577,700
-
(7,000)
(2,380,500)
(18,600)
17,300
(3,050,800)
(799,100)
(454,500)
(5,100)
4,624,400

2,789,900
-
(9,098,900)
(6,309,000)

13,000,000
(3,500,000)
(7,118,500)
2,381,500

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

(953,900)

696,900

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

1,949,400

1,252,500

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

$ 995,500

$1,949,400

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company paid interest totaling $3,048,600 and
$4,386,500, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company paid income taxes
totaling $0 and $14,000, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a)

The Company and Basis of Presentation

AeroCentury Corp. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1997, acquires used regional aircraft
and engines for lease to foreign and domestic regional carriers.

(b)

Use of Estimates

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable for making judgments that are not readily apparent from other sources.

The most significant estimates with regard to these financial statements are the residual values of the aircraft, the
useful lives of the aircraft, the amount and timing of cash flow associated with each aircraft that are used to evaluate
whether assets are impaired, accrued maintenance costs, the estimated fair value of financial instruments, accounting
for income taxes, and the amounts recorded as allowances for doubtful accounts.

(c)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments readily convertible into known amounts of cash, with original
maturities of 90 days or less from the date of acquisition, as cash equivalents.

(d)

Aircraft Capitalization and Depreciation

The Company’s interests in aircraft and aircraft engines are recorded at cost, which includes acquisition costs. Since
inception, the Company has purchased only used aircraft and aircraft engines. It is the Company’s policy to hold
aircraft for approximately twelve years unless market conditions dictate otherwise. Therefore, depreciation of
aircraft is initially computed using the straight-line method over the twelve-year period to an estimated residual
value based on appraisal. The Company estimates the period over which it will hold aircraft engines based upon
estimated usage, repair costs and other factors, and depreciates them to their appraised residual value over such
period using the straight-line method.

Assets that are held for sale are not subject to depreciation and are separately classified on the balance sheet. There
were no assets held for sale at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

(e)

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit
price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs, to the extent possible. The standard describes a fair
value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs. The first two are considered observable and the last unobservable.

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair
value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table shows by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s assets at fair value:

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Total

Level
1

Level
2

Level
3

Total

Level
1

Level
2

Level
3

Money
market funds
included in
cash and cash
equivalents

$736,000

$ -

$1,733,000

$ -

Total

$736,000

$ -

$1,733,000

$ -

As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no liabilities that are required to be measured and
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company determines fair value of long-lived assets held and used, such as aircraft and aircraft engines held for
lease, by reference to independent appraisals, quoted market prices (e.g., offers to purchase) and other factors. An
impairment charge is recorded when the Company believes that the carrying value of an asset will not be recovered
through future net cash flows and that carrying value exceeds its fair value. During the years ended December 31,
2011 and 2010, there was no recorded write-down of long-lived assets recorded.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

(e)

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments, other than cash and cash equivalents, consist principally of accounts
receivable, accounts payable, amounts borrowed under a credit facility and borrowings under notes payable. The
fair value of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates the carrying value of these financial
instruments because of their short-term nature.

Borrowings under the Company’s Credit Facility bear floating rates of interest that reset periodically to a market
benchmark rate plus a credit margin. The Company believes the effective interest rates of its various debt
agreements approximate current market rates for such indebtedness at the balance sheet date. The Company
believes the carrying amount of its floating and fixed rate debt at the balance sheet dates approximates their fair
values, which were estimated by calculation of the present value of future repayment obligations using estimates of
borrowing rates that would be available to the Company for such instruments.

(f)

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews assets for impairment when there has been an event or a change in circumstances indicating
that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. In addition, the Company routinely reviews
all assets for impairment annually. Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to
the future estimated undiscounted cash flows (without interest charges) that the asset is expected to generate.
Estimates are based on currently available market data and independent appraisals and are subject to fluctuation
from time to time. If these estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of an asset at the time of
evaluation, any impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset
exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined by reference to independent appraisals and other factors considered
relevant by management. Significant management judgment is required in the forecasting of future operating results
that are used in the preparation of estimated future undiscounted cash flows and, if different conditions prevail in the
future, material write-downs may occur.

(g)

Deferred Financing Costs and Commitment Fees

Costs incurred in connection with term debt financing are deferred and amortized over the term of the debt using the
effective interest method or, in certain instances where the differences are not material, using the straight-line
method. Costs incurred in connection with the Company’s Credit Facility are deferred and amortized using the
straight-line method.

Commitment fees for unused funds are expensed as incurred.

(h)

Security deposits

The Company’s leases are typically structured so that if any event of default occurs under a lease, the Company may
apply all or a portion of the lessee’s security deposit to cure such default. If such application of the security deposit
is made, the lessee typically is required to replenish and maintain the full amount of the deposit during the remaining
term of the lease. All of the security deposits received by the Company are refundable to the lessee at the end of the
lease, upon satisfaction of all lease terms.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

(i)

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Taxes

As part of the process of preparing the Company’s financial statements, management is required to estimate income
taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. This process involves estimating the Company’s
current tax exposure under the most recent tax laws and assessing temporary differences resulting from differing
treatment of items for tax and GAAP purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which
are included in the balance sheet. Management must also assess the likelihood that the Company’s deferred tax
assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and, to the extent management believes it is more likely than
not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the Company establishes a valuation
allowance. To the extent the Company establishes a valuation allowance or changes the allowance in a period, the
Company reflects the corresponding increase or decrease within the tax provision in the statement of operations.
Significant management judgment is required in determining the Company’s future taxable income for purposes of
assessing the Company’s ability to realize any benefit from its deferred taxes.

The Company accrues non-income based sales, use, value added and franchise taxes as other tax expense in the
statements of operations.

(j)

Revenue Recognition, Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Revenue from leasing of aircraft assets is recognized as operating lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the
terms of the applicable lease agreements. Deferred payments are recorded as accrued rent when the cash rent
received is lower than the straight-line revenue recognized. Such receivables decrease over the term of the
applicable leases. Non-refundable maintenance reserves are based on usage and are accrued as maintenance reserves
revenue.

In instances where collectibility is not reasonably assured, the Company recognizes revenue as cash payments are
received. The Company estimates and charges to income a provision for bad debts based on its experience with
each specific customer, the level of past due accounts, and its analysis of the lessee’s overall financial condition. If
the financial condition of any of the Company’s customers deteriorates, it could result in actual losses exceeding any
estimated allowances.

The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $1,924,400 and $0,
respectively. The December 31, 2011 allowance related to one of the Company’s customers with which the
Company had previously agreed to defer a portion of rent and reserves payments due during 2010. In January 2012,
the Company and this customer signed an agreement governing the repayment of the past due amounts, a portion of
which will be forgiven by the Company upon receipt of all payments due under the agreement.

(k)

Comprehensive Income

The Company does not have any comprehensive income other than the revenue and expense items included in the
statements of operations. As a result, comprehensive income equals net income for the years ended December 31,
2011 and 2010.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

(l)

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Reclassifications

Certain of the prior period financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income or cash flows. Amounts
reported for maintenance expense for the year ended December 30, 2010 in the accompanying statements of
operations include $283,800 of bad debt expense recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Such amount,
advanced on behalf of a lessee, was related to maintenance and was subject to reimbursement. The
Company determined the amount was uncollectible and recorded a bad debt allowance at June 30, 2010. This
amount has been reclassified to maintenance expense, as the Company believes that this classification better
describes the nature of the expense.

(m)

Finance Leases

The lease for one of the Company’s aircraft contains a purchase option for the lessee for an amount substantially
below the estimated residual value of the asset at the date for purchase under such option. Consequently, the
Company considers the purchase option to be a “bargain purchase option” and has classified such lease as a finance
lease for financial accounting purposes. As discussed in note 2, the Company previously had a second finance lease
until June 2011. The Company does not include the value, purchase price or accumulated depreciation of finance
lease assets on its balance sheet. Instead, for any finance lease, the discounted present value of (i) future minimum
lease payments (including bargain purchase options) and (ii) any residual value not subject to a bargain purchase
option are reported as a finance lease receivable. Rental revenue and depreciation expense are not recognized on
finance leases. Rather, the Company accrues interest on the balance of the finance lease receivable based on the
interest rate inherent in the lease. The Company’s results for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 included
$243,500 and $0 respectively, of interest earned on finance leases

Aircraft and Aircraft Engines Held for Lease

At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s aircraft and aircraft engines, which were on lease or
held for lease, consisted of the following.

Model

Fokker 100
Bombardier Dash-8-300
Fokker 50
General Electric CF34-8E5 engine
Bombardier Dash-8-Q400
Saab 340B
Saab 340B Plus
deHavilland DHC-8-100
deHavilland DHC-6
Saab 340A

December 31, 2011
% of net
book value

Number
owned

December 31, 2010
% of net
book value

Number
owned

7
8
14
3
1
6
2
2
1
1

28%
23%
18%
8%
8%
6%
4%
4%
1%
-

7
8
14
3
1
6
-
2
3
2

30%
23%
19%
8%
7%
6%
-
4%
1%
2%

Net book value at December 31, 2011 excludes the Company’s Saab 340A aircraft, which is subject to a finance
lease.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Aircraft and Aircraft Engines Held for Lease (continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company purchased two Saab 340B Plus aircraft. The Company
also paid $936,500 for equipment that was installed on several aircraft and for acquisition costs related to aircraft
purchased in December 2010 and January 2012. The Company also capitalized $1,855,900 for an engine
maintenance contract related to one of the Company’s aircraft. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the
Company purchased a Bombardier Dash-8-Q400 aircraft, and paid $301,700 for equipment that was installed on
several aircraft and for acquisition costs related to aircraft engines purchased in December 2009.

During 2011, the Company sold two of its deHavilland DHC-6 aircraft to the lessee and recorded a gain of
approximately $1,053,000. The Company also recorded a gain on insurance proceeds of approximately $318,000 in
connection with the total loss of an asset that was subject to a finance lease.

During 2010, the Company recorded a net gain on insurance proceeds of $331,000 in connection with the total loss
of an aircraft. The Company also recorded a gain of $85,000 on the sale of parts from an engine that was replaced
on another of the Company’s aircraft.

During 2011, the Company extended the leases for nine of its assets and leased seven assets that had been off lease
at December 31, 2010.

In January 2011, the Company determined that the leases for its two Saab 340A aircraft should be treated as finance
leases. The Company recorded a receivable of approximately $2,883,000 for the present value of the rents due
under the leases and a related reduction in aircraft net book value. One of the aircraft sustained significant damage
and was declared a total loss during the second quarter of 2011, resulting in the $318,000 gain discussed above. At
December 31, 2011, the balance of the finance lease receivable was $1,271,400.

In February 2011, the Company amended its deferral agreement with one customer to extend the due date to May
31, 2011. The Company also agreed to pay $284,800 to a maintenance vendor on behalf of the customer in
connection with maintenance performed on one of the Company’s aircraft. Under the agreement, the customer was
required to reimburse the Company for the vendor payment no later than May 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011, the
Company had an allowance for doubtful accounts related to that customer in the amount of $1,924,400 for the
amounts owed in excess of payments received and the security deposits held by the Company. As discussed in Note
11, in early 2012, the Company and the customer signed a memorandum of understanding regarding the arrearages
owed to the Company.

At December 31, 2011, five of the Company’s assets, comprised of three Fokker 100 aircraft, one Saab 340B
aircraft and one General Electric CF34-8E5 engine, were off lease. As discussed in Note 11, the engine was re-
leased in March 2012. The Company is seeking re-lease opportunities for the off-lease aircraft.

Maintenance and Accrued Costs

Maintenance costs under the Company’s triple net operating leases are generally the responsibility of the lessees.
Most of the Company’s leases require payment of maintenance reserves (based upon usage) that are intended to
accumulate funds that are expected to cover most or all of the cost of the lessees’ performance of certain
maintenance obligations under the leases. Some of these payments for maintenance reserves are refundable, and
some are non-refundable.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Maintenance and Accrued Costs (continued)

Refundable maintenance reserves received by the Company are based on lessee-reported usage during the applicable
month and are accounted for as a liability, which is reduced when maintenance work is performed during the lease.
Maintenance reserves that are refundable to the lessee are refunded after all return conditions specified in the lease
and, in some cases, any other payments due under the lease are satisfied. Any refundable reserves retained by the
Company to satisfy return conditions are recorded as revenue when the aircraft is returned.

Non-refundable maintenance reserves billed to lessees are recorded monthly as maintenance reserves revenue
(assuming cash is received or collections are reasonably assured) based on the lessee-reported asset usage during the
applicable month.

The Company uses the direct expensing method to account for maintenance costs that are paid pursuant to non-
refundable maintenance reserve provisions of its leases or that are incurred by the Company directly (usually
associated with off-lease aircraft). Maintenance costs associated with non-refundable reserves are expensed in the
period in which sufficient information is received from the lessee to estimate maintenance costs, or when a
reimbursement claim is made by the lessee for maintenance incurred where no earlier estimate was possible.

The timing difference between recording maintenance reserves revenue as usage occurs and recording maintenance
expense as maintenance is performed can have material effects on the volatility of reported earnings.

The accompanying balance sheets reflect refundable maintenance payments billed to lessees based on usage and
accrued maintenance costs as liabilities for maintenance reserves. At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
the Company’s maintenance reserves and accruals consisted of the following:

Refundable maintenance reserves
Accrued maintenance costs

December 31,
2011

December 31,
2010

$4,801,300
1,013,400
$5,814,700

$4,415,100
2,446,800
$6,861,900

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Maintenance and Accrued Costs (continued)

Additions to and deductions from the Company’s accrued maintenance costs during the years ended December 31,
2011 and 2010 for aircraft maintenance were as follows:

Balance, beginning of year

Additions:

Charged to expense

Reversals of previously accrued maintenance costs
Total maintenance expense
Capital equipment
Accrued claims related to refundable maintenance reserves
Other
Total additions

Deductions:
Payments
Prepaid maintenance
Other

For Years Ended
December 31,

2011

2010

$ 2,446,800

$ 2,433,700

11,466,100
(532,400)
10,933,700
487,800
83,500
-
11,505,000

11,785,300
374,200
778,900
12,938,400

12,965,500
(1,793,000)
11,172,500
226,000
2,798,500
375,200
14,572,200

13,764,800
-
794,300
14,559,100

Net (decrease)/increase in accrued maintenance costs

(1,433,400)

13,100

Balance, end of year

$ 1,013,400

$ 2,446,800

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Operating Segments

The Company operates in one business segment, the leasing of regional aircraft to foreign and domestic regional
airlines, and therefore does not present separate segment information for lines of business.

Approximately 9% and 12% of the Company’s operating lease revenue was derived from lessees domiciled in the
United States during 2011 and 2010, respectively. All revenues relating to aircraft leased and operated
internationally are denominated and payable in U.S. dollars.

The tables below set forth geographic information about the Company’s operating lease revenue for leased aircraft
and aircraft equipment, grouped by domicile of the lessee:

Operating Lease Revenue

Europe and United Kingdom
Caribbean
North America
Africa
Asia
South America
Central America

Net Book Value of Aircraft and
Aircraft Engines Held for Lease

Europe and United Kingdom
Caribbean
Off lease
Africa
North America
Asia
South America

Concentration of Credit Risk

For the Years Ended December 31,

2011

2010

$8,335,400
4,725,800
2,726,200
1,998,100
1,336,600
281,800
-
$19,403,900

$8,743,600
6,160,000
2,982,600
1,467,400
424,100
553,000
2,435,500
$22,766,200

December 31,

2011

2010

$38,875,100
23,585,000
20,657,100
16,392,100
11,623,700
11,072,400
2,039,600
$124,245,000

$37,934,200
24,526,900
35,840,200
6,562,600
13,031,300
3,913,100
5,014,300
$126,822,600

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash
deposits and receivables. The Company places its deposits with financial institutions and other creditworthy issuers
and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one party.

For the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company had three significant customers, which accounted for 19%,
14% and 13%, respectively, of lease revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2010 the Company had five
significant customers, which accounted for 16%, 12%, 12%, 11% and 11%, respectively, of lease revenue.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Concentration of Credit Risk (continued)

At December 31, 2011, the Company had a receivable from one lessee of $2,246,800, representing 76% of the
Company’s total receivables. Of that amount, $130,400 was paid in early 2012. As discussed in Note 11, in January
2012, the Company and the customer signed a memorandum of understanding regarding the repayment of the
balance owed.

At December 31, 2010, the Company had a receivable from one lessee of $536,600, representing 56% of the
Company’s total receivables. The lessee was a significant customer based on 2010 lease revenue. Of the $536,600,
$157,400 was paid in 2011 and $379,200 was payable in 2011 pursuant to a deferral agreement. As discussed
above, the Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts related to this customer in 2011 and, in January
2012, reached a settlement regarding repayment of the amounts due.

As of December 31, 2011, minimum future lease revenue payments receivable under noncancelable leases were as
follows:

Years ending

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

Operating
leases

Finance
lease

$19,317,600
11,998,800
5,592,500
1,671,100
772,100
$39,352,100

$ 264,000
1,158,000
-
-
-
$1,422,000

Minimum lease payments due under the Company’s finance lease include interest income totaling $150,600.

Notes Payable and Accrued Interest

At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company’s notes payable and accrued interest consisted of the
following:

Credit Facility principal
Credit Facility accrued interest
Subordinated Notes principal
Subordinated Notes discount

(a)

Credit Facility

December 31,

2011

2010

$65,200,000
472,700
-
-
$65,672,700

$63,000,000
122,800
2,343,500
(90,800)
$65,375,500

In April 2010, the Company’s previous $80 million credit facility was replaced with a new, two-year $75 million
credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) provided by a syndicate of banks. In June 2010, the Credit Facility was
increased to $90 million, with the addition of a new participant bank’s commitment of $15 million. The Credit
Facility is secured by all of the assets of the Company, including its aircraft and engine portfolio. In March 2012,
the Credit Facility was extended for one year, to April 29, 2013, on terms similar to the original agreement.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Notes Payable and Accrued Interest (continued)

(a)

Credit Facility (continued)

Although the total maximum credit under the Credit Facility was $24,800,000 and $27,000,000 as of December 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, exclusions of certain assets from the collateral base resulted in
approximately $17,388,300 and $5,200,000 of available borrowing ability at December 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively.

The weighted average interest rate on the Credit Facility was 4.17% at December 31, 2011 and 4.34% at December
31, 2010.

(b)

Senior unsecured subordinated debt (“Subordinated Notes”)

During 2011 and 2010, the Company repaid $2,343,500 and $7,118,500, respectively, of principal under the
Subordinated Notes. The final amortizing payment was made in December 2011.

The Subordinated Notes purchasers hold warrants to purchase up to 81,224 shares of the Company's common stock
at an exercise price of $8.75 per share. The warrants are exercisable for a four-year period after the final maturity of
the related Subordinated Notes. Pursuant to an investor’s rights agreement, the warrants are subject to registration
rights that require the Company to use commercially reasonable efforts to register the shares issued upon exercise of
the warrants on a registration statement filed with the SEC.

(c)

Future maturities of notes payable

As of December 31, 2011, principal payments due under the Company’s Credit Facility were as follows:

Year ending December 31, 2013

$65,200,000

As discussed above, in March 2012, the maturity date of the Company’s Credit Facility was extended to April 29,
2013.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Stockholder Rights Plan

In December 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a stockholder rights plan granting a dividend of one
stock purchase right for each share of the Company’s common stock outstanding as of December 18, 2009 and the
Company entered into a rights agreement dated December 1, 2009 in connection therewith. The rights become
exercisable only upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the rights agreement, including the acquisition of
15% of the Company’s outstanding common stock by a person or group in certain circumstances. Each right allows
the holder, other than an “acquiring person,” to purchase one one-hundredth of a share (a unit) of Series A Preferred
Stock at an initial purchase price of $97.00 under circumstances described in the rights agreement. The purchase
price, the number of units of preferred stock and the type of securities issuable upon exercise of the rights are subject
to adjustment. The rights expire at the close of business December 1, 2019 unless earlier redeemed or exchanged.
Until a right is exercised, the holder thereof, as such, has no rights as a stockholder of the Company, including the
right to vote or to receive dividends.

Income Taxes

The items comprising income tax expense are as follows:

Current tax provision:

Federal
State
Foreign
Current tax provision

Deferred tax provision:

Federal
State
Valuation allowance
Deferred tax (benefit)/provision

For the Years Ended December 31,

2011

2010

$ -
800
189,100
189,900

(837,400)
6,700
158,600
(672,100)

$ -
2,000
95,600
97,600

751,500
27,200
-
778,700

Total income tax (benefit)/provision

$(482,200)

$876,300

Total income tax expense differs from the amount that would be provided by applying the statutory federal income
tax rate to pretax earnings as illustrated below:

Income tax provision at statutory federal income tax rate
State tax (benefit)/provision, net of federal benefit
Valuation allowance
Other

For the Years Ended December 31,

2011

2010

$(657,100)
(7,700)
158,600
24,000

$858,300
10,000
-
8,000

Total income tax (benefit)/provision

$(482,200)

$876,300

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Income Taxes (continued)

Temporary differences and carry-forwards that give rise to a significant portion of deferred tax assets and liabilities
as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

Deferred tax assets:

Current year tax losses
Foreign tax credit carryover
Maintenance
Prior year minimum tax credit
Bad debt allowance and other
Deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities:

Accumulated depreciation on aircraft and aircraft engines

Minimum lease payments receivable
Deferred income
Subordinated Notes loan fees and discount

Net deferred tax liabilities before valuation allowance

Valuation allowance

Net deferred tax liabilities

December 31,

2011

2010

$ 2,520,200
1,459,000
305,700
100,800
921,300
$ 5,307,000

(16,403,900)
(437,300)
(401,600)
-
(11,935,800)
(158,600)
$(12,094,400)

$ 1,354,100
1,213,100
68,100
100,800
568,400
$ 3,304,500

(15,931,300)
-
(128,800)
(10,900)
(12,766,500)
-
$(12,766,500)

The current year tax losses are available to offset federal taxable income in the two preceding years and in future
years through 2031. The foreign tax credit carryover is available to offset federal tax expense in the first preceding
tax year and in future years. The foreign tax credit carryover expires beginning in 2013 and extends through 2021.
The minimum tax credit is available to offset federal tax expense in excess of the alternative minimum tax in future
years and does not expire.

A significant portion of the deferred tax assets recognized relates to net operating loss and foreign tax credit
carryovers. A valuation allowance was deemed necessary on certain foreign tax credit carryovers at December 31,
2011, as the Company has concluded that, based on an assessment of all available evidence, it is more likely than
not that future taxable income will not be sufficient to realize these tax benefits. Where a valuation allowance was
not recorded, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that future taxable income (including reversal of
temporary differences) will be sufficient to realize the tax benefits for the balance of deferred tax assets on the
balance sheet at December 31, 2011.

No valuation allowance was deemed necessary for the deferred tax assets on the balance sheet at December 31,
2010, as the Company has concluded that, based on an assessment of all available evidence, it was more likely than
not that future taxable income (including reversal of temporary differences) would be sufficient to realize the tax
benefits.

At December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had no material unrecognized tax positions.

The Company accounts for interest related to uncertain tax positions as interest expense, and for income tax
penalties as tax expense.

All of the Company's tax years remain open to examination other than as barred in the various jurisdictions by
statutes of limitation.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

Computation of (Loss)/Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted (loss)/earnings per share are calculated as follows:

For the Years Ended December 31,

2011

2010

Net (loss)/income

$(1,450,400)

$1,648,100

Weighted average shares outstanding for the period
Dilutive effect of warrants
Weighted average diluted shares used in calculation
of diluted (loss)/earnings per share

Basic (loss)/earnings per share
Diluted (loss)/earnings per share

1,543,257
-

1,543,257
41,207

1,543,257

1,584,464

$ (0.94)
$ (0.94)

$ 1.07
$ 1.04

Basic (loss)/earnings per common share is computed using net (loss)/income and the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are computed using net income
and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, assuming dilution. Weighted average common
shares outstanding, assuming dilution, includes potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period.
Potentially dilutive common shares include the assumed exercise of warrants using the treasury stock method. For
the year ended December 31, 2011, the potential dilutive effect of outstanding warrants was 22,921 shares.
However, the effect of these potentially outstanding shares was not included in the calculation of diluted loss per
share for the current period because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

10.

Related Party Transactions

The Company’s portfolio of leased aircraft assets is managed and administered under the terms of a management
agreement with JetFleet Management Corp. (“JMC”), which is an integrated aircraft management, marketing and
financing business and a subsidiary of JetFleet Holding Corp. ("JHC"). Certain officers of the Company are also
officers of JHC and JMC and hold significant ownership positions in both JHC and the Company. Under the
Management Agreement, JMC receives a monthly management fee based on the net asset value of the assets under
management. JMC also receives an acquisition fee for locating assets for the Company, provided that the aggregate
purchase price, including chargeable acquisition costs and any acquisition fee, does not exceed the fair market value
of the asset based on appraisal, and may receive a remarketing fee in connection with the sale or re-lease of the
Company’s assets. The Company recorded management fees of $3,715,400 and $3,644,800 during the years ended
December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company paid acquisition fees totaling $184,000 and $297,400 to
JMC during 2011 and 2010, respectively, which were included in the cost basis of the asset purchased. During
2011, the Company paid remarketing fees of $363,500 to JMC. The Company paid no remarketing fees to JMC
during 2010.

In August 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Lee G. Beaumont in which Mr. Beaumont assigned to
the Company his rights to purchase certain aircraft engines from an unrelated third party seller. In January 2012,
Mr. Beaumont became a “related person” with respect to the Company due to his acquisition on the open market of
shares representing over 5% of the Company’s Common Stock. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and
2010, the Company paid Mr. Beaumont $66,700 and $66,700, respectively, in connection with the engine
purchases. A balance of $66,700 is payable in 2012.

AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2011

10.

Related Party Transactions (continued)

As discussed in Note 6, the Subordinated Notes purchasers hold warrants to purchase up to 81,224 shares of the
Company’s common stock. The Warrants became exercisable on December 30, 2011, and the shares issuable upon
exercise of the Warrants constitute over 5% of the Common Stock of the Company. As a result, the Subordinated
Notes purchasers became “related persons” with respect to the Company on October 31, 2011. During the year
ended December 31, 2011, the Company made interest payments totaling $228,200 to the Subordinated Notes
purchasers.

11.

Subsequent Events

In January 2012, the Company purchased a Bombardier Dash 8-Q314 aircraft on lease to a new customer in Asia,
with a lease term expiring in January 2018.

As discussed in Note 5, at December 31, 2011, the Company had a receivable from one customer of $2,246,800,
$130,400 of which was paid in early 2012. In January 2012, the Company and the customer signed a memorandum
of understanding regarding the balance owed to the Company. The memorandum of understanding specifies that the
customer will pay $1,270,000 of the arrearages over three years, with the balance forgiven upon receipt of all
payments due under the agreement. Since collectability of this receivable is not reasonably assured, the Company
will record these payments on a cash basis when received.

In February 2012, the Company and a current customer signed a letter of intent for the three-year lease of one of the
Company’s off-lease Fokker 100 aircraft. Delivery is expected to occur in the second quarter of 2012.

In March 2012, the Company’s Credit Facility was extended for one year, until April 29, 2013, on terms similar to
the original agreement.

In March 2012, the Company re-leased its off-lease General Electric CF34-8E5 engine to a customer in the United
States for a term of three months.

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures.

CEO and CFO Certifications. Attached as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) are
certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer
(the “CFO”), which are required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Section 302
Certifications”). This section of the Report includes information concerning the evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this should be read in conjunction with the Section 302
Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Evaluation of the Company’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures
(“Disclosure Controls”) are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), such as
this Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.

The Company’s management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of the design
and operation of the Company’s Disclosure Controls and concluded that the Company’s Disclosure Controls were
effective as of December 31, 2011.

Management’s Annual Report on the Company’s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Internal control
over financial reporting (“Internal Control”) is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of
records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. The Company’s management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate Internal Control. Management evaluated the Company’s Internal Control
based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework and concluded that the Company’s Internal Control was effective as of
December 31, 2011. This report does not include an attestation report on Internal Control by the Company’s
registered public accounting firm since the Company is a smaller reporting company under the rules of the SEC.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. No change in Internal Control occurred during the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s Internal Control.

Item 9B.

Other Information.

None.

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

PART III

The information required by this item is included under (i) “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” as it relates to
members of the Company’s Board of Directors, including the Company’s Audit Committee and the Company’s
Audit Committee financial experts, any changes to procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees
to the Company’s Board of Directors, (ii) “Information Regarding the Company’s Directors and Officers” as it
relates to the Company’s executive officers, and (iii) “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”
as it relates to information concerning Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance, in the Company’s
definitive proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”), to be filed in connection with the Company’s 2012 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Company has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics, or code of conduct. The code of conduct qualifies
as a “code of ethics” within the meaning of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules
promulgated thereunder. A copy of the code of conduct is available on the Company’s website at
www.aerocentury.com or upon written request to the Investor Relations Department, 1440 Chapin Avenue, Suite
310, Burlingame, California 94010. To the extent required by law, any amendments to, or waivers from, any
provision of the code will be promptly disclosed publicly. To the extent permitted by such requirements, the
Company intends to make such public disclosure on its website in accordance with SEC rules.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation.

Incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Information Regarding the Company’s
Directors and Officers — Employee Compensation.”

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.

Incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management.”

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Related Party Transactions.”

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Information Regarding Auditors – Audit
Fees.”

Item 15.

Exhibits.

(b)

Exhibits

PART IV

3.1

3.2

Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.08 to the registration
statement on Form S-4/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 24, 1997 SEC File
No. 333-24743, Film No. 97644740.

Form of Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.07 to the registration statement on Form S-4/A filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 10, 1997 SEC File No. 333-24743, Film No. 97622056.

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

4.1

4.2

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company dated January 22, 1999, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22, 1999, SEC File No. 001-13387 Film No. 98581428

Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated May 6, 2008,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 7, 2008

Amendment to Bylaws, dated January 30, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 3, 2009

Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of the Company dated December 1, 2009, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
December 7, 2009

Reference is made to Exhibit 3.6

Rights Agreement by and between the Company and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company dated
December 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on December 7, 2009

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of its directors and officers,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 1998, SEC File No.
001-13387 Film No. 98581428

Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated April 23, 1998, between the Company and JetFleet
Management Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2000
SEC File No. 001-13387 Film No. 566570

Aircraft Sale and Purchase Agreement with Denim Air Lease & Finance B.V. incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December
28, 2005, SEC File No. 001-13387 Film No. 051288291

Aircraft Sale and Purchase Agreement with VLM Airlines, N.V. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 28, 2005,
SEC File No. 001-13387 Film No. 051288291

and Satellite Fund V, LLC

Securities Purchase Agreement between Satellite Fund II, LP, Satellite Fund IV, LP, The Apogee Group
LLC,
the
(collectively
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2007

"Subordinated Lenders")

and

the

Form of Warrant issued to the Subordinated Lenders incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2007

Investors Rights Agreement between the Company and the Subordinated Lenders incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on April 18, 2007

10.8

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between the Company, National City Bank, as agent,
and National City Bank, California Bank & Trust, Bridge Bank, National Association, and First Bank dba
First Bank & Trust, as lenders, dated April 17, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2007

10.9

10.10

10.11

10.12

10.13

to Securities Purchase Agreement between

Amendment
the
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 19, 2008

the Subordinated Lenders and

Second Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement between the Subordinated Lenders and the
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on July 23, 2008

Form of Amended and Restated Warrant issued to the Subordinated Lenders incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 23,
2008

Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, between the Company, PNC Bank, N.A. as
agent, and the participating lenders thereunder, dated March 31, 2010, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99 to the Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31,
2010.

Loan and Security Agreement, between the Company, Union Bank, N.A. as agent, and the participating
lenders thereunder, dated April 28, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Report on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 14, 2011

10.14

Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement, between the Company, Union Bank, N.A. as agent, and the
Subordinated Creditors thereunder, dated April 28, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the
Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 14, 2011

10.15 Management Fee Subordination Agreement, between the Company, JetFleet Management Corp. and
Union Bank, N.A. as agent, dated April 28, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Report
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 14, 2011

10. 16 Form of Revolving Note dated June 4, 2010, delivered to Umpqua Bank, issued under the Loan and
Security Agreement between the Company and Union Bank, as Agent, dated April 28, 2010, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2010, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2011

10.17

Loan Modification Agreement, between the Company, Union Bank, N.A., California Bank & Trust,
Umpqua Bank and U.S. Bank National Association, dated May 13, 2011, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed with Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 21, 2011

10.18 Second Loan Modification Agreement, between the Company, Union Bank, N.A., California Bank &

Trust, Umpqua Bank and U.S. Bank National Association, dated March 8, 2012

31.1

31.2

32.1

Certification of Neal D. Crispin, Chief Executive Officer of AeroCentury Corp., dated March 9, 2012,
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of Toni M. Perazzo, Chief Financial Officer of AeroCentury Corp., dated March 9, 2012,
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of Neal D. Crispin, Chief Executive Officer of AeroCentury Corp., dated March 9, 2012,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

Certification of Toni M. Perazzo, Chief Financial Officer of AeroCentury Corp., dated March 9, 2012,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

AEROCENTURY CORP.

/s/ Toni M. Perazzo
-------------------------------
Toni M. Perazzo
Senior Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer

Date March 9, 2012

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and
appoints Neal D. Crispin and Toni M. Perazzo, and each of them, his or her attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of
substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K and to file
the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his or her substitute or
substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 9, 2012.

Signature

Title

Dated

/s/ Neal D. Crispin
----------------------
Neal D. Crispin

/s/ Toni M. Perazzo
----------------------
Toni M. Perazzo

/s/ Roy E. Hahn
----------------------
Roy E. Hahn

/s/ Thomas W. Orr
----------------------
Thomas W. Orr

/s/ Evan M. Wallach
----------------------
Evan M. Wallach

Director, President and Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Registrant (Principal Executive Officer)

March 9, 2012

Director, Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary of the
Registrant (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

March 9, 2012

Director

March 9, 2012

CORPORATE INFORMATION

Officers and Directors

Neal D. Crispin
President and Chairman of the Board

Transfer Agent and Registrar
Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company
17 Battery Place, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10004

Toni M. Perazzo
Director, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and
Senior Vice President - Finance

Legal Counsel
Morrison & Foerster LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304

Christopher B. Tigno
General Counsel

Roy E. Hahn
Director and
Managing Director of Marbridge Group, LLC

Thomas W. Orr
Director, Audit Committee Chair and
Accounting Consultant

Registered Independent Public Accountants
BDO USA, LLP
One Market - Spear Tower, Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94105

Corporate Headquarters
AeroCentury Corp.
1440 Chapin Ave., Suite 310
Burlingame, CA 94010

Evan M. Wallach
Director and
Managing Director, Aviation/Transportation Markets
of Jefferies & Co.

Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at:
The Hiller Aviation Museum
601 Skyway Road
San Carlos, CA, on May 3, 2012 at 12:00 P.M.

Form 10-K
The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for 2011 may be obtained by writing:
AeroCentury Corp.
1440 Chapin Ave., Suite 310
Burlingame, CA 94010

Stock Price and Shareholder Data
The Company’s common stock is traded on
the NYSE Amex exchange under
the symbol ACY.

Annual Report Cover 3-10 3/3/10 11:55 AM Page 1

Worldwide • Regional Aircraft • Leasing

AeroCentury Corp.

1440 Chapin Ave., Suite 310
Burlingame, CA 94010
650-340-1888
Fax: 650-696-3929
www.aerocentury.com

2011 Annual Report