Quarterlytics / AFC Energy PLC

AFC Energy PLC

afc · LSE
Claim this profile
Ticker afc
Exchange LSE
Sector
Industry
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2011 Annual Report · AFC Energy PLC
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
AFC Energy plc
Report and Accounts
for the year ended 31 October 2011

Stock Code: AFC

 21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our Business
Our Business

Who we are . . .

AFC Energy develops low-cost alkaline 
fuel cell systems that use hydrogen to 
produce clean electricity.

AFC Energy’s fuel cell systems are developed with commercial viability as  
the key driver and in this regard we have re-engineered proven alkaline fuel  
cell technology:

 • High efficiency levels. Using readily available hydrogen and air as the source of 
oxygen, electrical efficiency is up to 60% which compares to around 30% for 
conventional electricity generating technology.

 • Low cost production. Fabricating with low cost materials combined with 

industrially proven production processes.

 • Low temperature and pressure. Operating at less than 100 degrees Celsius 

enables us to use polymer mouldings for many parts.

 • Hydrogen sealing. Operating at low pressure, hydrogen is readily sealed within 

the system.

 • Thermal management. A circulating liquid electrolyte simplifies the thermal 

management of the system.

 • Balance of plant. The majority of components are off-the-shelf and mass 

manufactured for other uses enabling us to benefit from these economies 
of scale.

 • Value engineered for assembly. The component count has significantly reduced 

and commercial units are designed for easy assembly.

AFC Energy has significantly reduced the cost of its technology to make its fuel 
cell system a commercially compelling proposition.

AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Highlights

“AFC Energy has made great 
strides to deliver a commercial 
product this year. The transition to 
a successful, revenue generating 
company has started. Our team 
has all the right skill sets to build 
upon our partner/customer 
relationships to allow the delivery 
of increasingly larger systems. 
Momentum is building.”

Ian Williamson Chief Executive

See further information online:
afcenergy.com

FY11 Highlights

Post Period Highlights

 • Installed first commercial-scale Beta System 

unit at Dunsfold, UK

 • Installed two further Beta Systems with 
AkzoNobel at Bitterfeld, Germany

 • Strengthened the Board through the appointment 
of Ian Williamson as Chief Executive Officer and Sir 
John Sunderland as a Non-Executive Director

 • Generated first industrial power from Beta 

 • Progressed with partners, including: AkzoNobel, 

fuel cell system

John Lewis Partnership, Air Products, 
Waste2Tricity, N2telligence

 • Bolstered the technical team with the 

recruitment of a renowned fuel cell scientist

 • Awarded a grant of €405,600 as part of €2.9 
million European Union project “LASER-
CELL”

 • Made significant technological 

advancements, having frozen its system 
design, deployed it in the field and started 
to generate data that its customers can use

 • Increased activity on protection of 

intellectual property and registration of 
patents

 • Completed a successful fundraising of £3.93 

million (net) in July 2011

 • Cash as at 31 October 2011 £5.97 million (31 

October 2010: £5.35 million)

01

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our BusinessOur Business

Chairman’s Statement

“AFC Energy continues to make significant technological progress as it 
optimises the performance of its Beta fuel cell system using the highly 
valuable data generated by the field trials, and takes significant strides 
towards commercialisation. The first installations, commissioned by 
AkzoNobel, in the year have already provided initial evidence of the 
robustness and effectiveness of AFC Energy’s technology. The Board 
looks forward to increasing its commercial routes to market through 
partners, both new and existing, and looks forward to translating its 
technical excellence into commercial success in the near future.”

Tim Yeo, Chairman

cell. This is why AFC Energy has 
focused on re-engineering the fuel cell 
system so that it has the lowest 
life-time cost of ownership. 

However, as reported by Fuel Cell 
Today, the industry as a whole is set to 
benefit from the increasing worldwide 
focus on clean, renewable energy 
sources, a good example of which can 
be seen in South Korea. The 
Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) in 
South Korea will require electricity 
producers to generate 10% of their 
output using new and renewable 
technologies by 2022, equivalent to 
approximately 6,000MW of new 
capacity. Fuel cells are awarded the 
highest weighting of all renewables in 
the RPS demonstrating the massive 
opportunity for large scale stationary 
fuel cell systems in that country alone. 
The current feed-in tariff is $0.23 per 
kilowatt hour of electricity and a vast 
proportion of the 54.6MW installed in 
2011 globally was in South Korea.

Overview
Due to a year of excellent technical 
progress, full commercialisation of AFC 
Energy’s technology is a lot closer.

AFC Energy commissioned its first 
commercial-design unit, known as the 

Beta System, at Dunsfold in June and 
following the completion of a rigorous 
HAZOP (HAZardous OPerability) study 
in August, was then able to 
commission two further Beta Systems 
with AkzoNobel at its Bitterfeld 
chlor-alkali plant in October 2011. 
These units subsequently began 
producing electricity during late 2011. 
A comprehensive series of trials is 
continuing to allow AFC Energy to 
assess a number of important factors 
intrinsic to future deployment and 
development, such as longevity and 
power density of electrodes.

AkzoNobel was AFC Energy’s first 
major partner and we are grateful for 
their continued support and advice. 
The ability to test and modify these 
systems in the field as well as the 
laboratory environment has been and 
will continue to be invaluable.

The Centre for Process Innovation (CPI) 
continued its independent review of 
AFC Energy in May 2011 and January 
2012. We believe these reviews 
independently benchmark the progress 
of our technology. This is covered in 
more detail in the Operating Review 
but these positive assessments are also 
a testament to AFC Energy’s rapid 
progress over the last two years.

Market Background
During a period when major 
economies in the West are 
implementing austerity measures 
there is a danger that investment in 
more efficient, cleaner power 
generation will not get the priority 
that it deserves. Despite this risk, 
however, the rise of the fuel cell 
continues with global total shipments 
of stationary power units increasing in 
2011 to around 10,000 units (54.6MW), 
up from 7,400 units (32.9MW) in 2010*.

This rise has been spread across 
micro-CHP systems and uninterruptible 
power systems up to multi-megawatt 
prime power installations, supported in 
a number of instances by feed-in tariffs 
set by governments. One or two 
companies in particular have enjoyed 
high profile orders recently. We are all 
encouraged by the industry’s progress 
as a whole, but in our view it will 
remain a niche, albeit a growing one, 
until fuel cells can compete on level 
economic terms with the conventional 
power generation technologies of 
turbines and engines.

The only proven fuel cell type that is 
likely to be capable of competing on 
level economic terms with conventional 
electricity generation is the alkaline fuel 

* Source: Fuel Cell Today.

02

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Congratulations are due to the whole 
AFC Energy technical team, ably led by 
Gene Lewis, for these achievements.

The Company has continued to 
manage its cash resources carefully 
and at the end of October the net cash 
position was £5.97 million (31 October 
2010: £5.35 million). During the year, 
AFC Energy raised £3.93 million (net) 
by way of a placing of new shares, 
largely to existing investors. As a result 
of this Linc Energy increased its 
holding to 12%, which the Board 
welcomes as a vote of confidence from 
a significant shareholder.

Our Partners
As I have already mentioned, the work 
with our first major partner AkzoNobel 
continues and it remains our view that 
the chlor-alkali industry represents a very 
substantial opportunity given the 
quantities of high quality hydrogen that 
are produced as a part of the process. A 
significant proportion of this is either not 
used or has relatively low value and 
therefore provides an abundant source 
of fuel for our systems.

Linc Energy is AFC Energy’s partner in 
Australia and on underground coal 
gasification worldwide. During the 
year we continued to work closely 
with Linc Energy in preparation for 
future deployment into these markets.

In the UK, the John Lewis Partnership is 
making significant progress towards 
improving their energy efficiency and 
reducing their carbon emissions through 
a wide range of initiatives. AFC Energy 
plc was therefore delighted to sign a 
commercial Memorandum of 
Understanding (MoU) with them in April 
to evaluate the economic potential of 
using its fuel cell system to generate low 
carbon emission electricity for Waitrose 
supermarkets and John Lewis stores. 
The parties continue to work together to 
optimise the financial and environmental 
cases.

AFC Energy’s ‘Beta’ Fuel Cell 
generates first industrial power

AFC Energy’s Beta fuel cell systems have been 
generating electrical power at the AkzoNobel 
site since late last year.

The two Beta commercial-design fuel cell systems, installed since 
October 2011, have been equipped with electrodes for trials, and are 
fuelled using AkzoNobel’s industrially produced hydrogen. This work 
follows a series of trials that the Company has been carrying out using 
a Beta system installed at its UK facilities. AFC Energy uses its own in-
house pilot manufacturing to fabricate electrodes required for testing.

This is the first commercial reference site for the generation of data 
and demonstration of the whole Beta system. The Company expects 
to be able to publish results from the trials after their completion.

03

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our Business 
Our Business

Chairman’s Statement continued

AFC Energy’s relationship with 
N2telligence, entered into in May 
2011, opens the door for applications 
where exhaust air from fuel cells, with 
low oxygen content, can be used to 
help reduce the risk of fire spreading 
in buildings such as data centres and 
archives.

Waste2Tricity Ltd has been working 
on a number of long lead-time 
projects to deploy the most efficient 
economic technologies for the 
conversion of municipal waste into 
power. Since 2009, it has had a licence 
option from AFC Energy to deploy 
AFC Energy fuel cells on waste to 
energy projects in the UK. AFC Energy 
owns 25% of Waste2Tricity and  this 
investment is showing signs of 
bearing fruit. We are pleased to 
report that Waste2Tricity has made full 
repayment to AFC Energy of its loan 
and accumulated interest whcih 
stands at £152,500.

Amongst other things Waste2Tricity has 
the opportunity of deploying fuel cell 
systems at Billingham, Teesside as part 
of the Tees Valley Renewable Energy 
Facility. This project progressed during 
the year following the grant of planning 
permission in August 2011. This project 
is led by Air Products in partnership with 
AlterNRG Westinghouse with the aim of 
building a 49MW plant using municipal 
waste as feedstock.

Management and Board
The Board was delighted to have 
welcomed Ian Williamson as Chief 
Executive in September 2011. Ian 
joined AFC Energy from Air Products, 
where he had worked for 26 years, and 
was leading Air Products’ new venture 
into the renewable energy market. Ian 
was instrumental in Air Products 
obtaining the planning permission for 
the municipal waste feedstock project 
at Billingham in Teesside mentioned 
above. His experience within the 
industrial gas sector, particularly centred 
on the manufacture, provision, 
distribution and commercial sale of 
hydrogen, is expected to benefit AFC 
Energy enormously. Ian’s arrival has 
already had a positive impact on the 
Company.

During the year, there were two 
further Board changes. David Smith, 
who is Chief Operating Officer at one 
of our partners Linc Energy, joined as 
a Non-Executive Director in October 
2011, while Ed Wilson, who was 
appointed as Managing Director in 
February 2011, resigned in May 2011.

We have also received notice that 
Simon Hunt, Non-Executive Director, 
has decided not to stand for re-
election at the AGM due to the 
potential for a conflict of business 
interests with his work on green 
projects elsewhere. I would like to 
take this opportunity to thank Simon 
for his contribution to the Board.

We are delighted that Sir John 
Sunderland has agreed to join the Board 
with effect from 8 March. Sir John brings 
to the Company extensive business 
experience which will be invaluable as 
the Company progresses towards 
commercialisation. Until July 2008 he 
was Chairman of Cadbury Schweppes 
PLC, having worked at Cadbury’s in 
various roles, including that of Chief 
Executive, since 1968. He is a Non-
Executive Director of Barclays, Chairman 
of Merlin Entertainments Limited, an 
Adviser to CVC Capital Partners and 
Chancellor of Aston University.

04

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Once again I would like to thank the 
Board and the outstanding team of 
hard-working people at AFC Energy 
as well as its partner companies and 
suppliers for their efforts during the 
year, and for the support we have 
received from investors.

Tim Yeo
Chairman
29 February 2012

Summary and Outlook
Fuel cells are gaining increasing 
acceptance worldwide as companies 
seek progressively to decarbonise, 
requiring them to embrace renewables 
technology. To date, however, AFC 
Energy believes that there has been 
little consideration of the cost per 
kilowatt hour of electricity produced 
when fuel cells are used.  This is likely 
to become an increasingly important 
component in any calculation and thus 
play to one of the many key strengths 
of AFC Energy’s fuel cells.

2011 was another year of strong 
progress towards commercialisation 
with the first Beta Systems deployed 
in the field. The further strengthening 
of the management team will enable 
AFC Energy to maximise its potential 
in 2012 and beyond. In a year which 
sees London hosting the Olympics it 
is perhaps apt to describe AFC as 
entering the home straight on its path 
to commercialisation.

05

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our BusinessOur Business

Operating and  
Financial Review

This has been a very successful year in terms of 
the technical development of our fuel cells

AFC Energy occupies a very clear space within the fuel cell and future energy landscape. 
We believe our technology will develop into one of the lowest cost, most efficient fuel 
conversion mechanisms available. Great strides continue to be made in development 
terms but also we see increased activity from many interested future customers that 
understand the potential of AFC Energy’s technology and are seeking to apply it to their 
own needs.

06

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Operating and Financial Review

Technical Progress
This has been a very successful year in 
terms of the technical development of 
our fuel cells. We have seen the first 
industrial deployment, testing and 
operation of Beta systems at 
AkzoNobel’s Bitterfeld plant in Germany. 
The focus of working with a prestigious 
partner at its site has quickened the pace 
of our development cycles. The 
availability of hydrogen has allowed us to 
test stack longevity and performance at 
minimal cost to the Company. Our 
modular Beta system design allows us to 
test multiple cartridges and balance of 
plant options. We have also been able to 
perform stack maintenance in the field, 
which builds on our assertion that this is 
a very robust technology.  

Over the course of the last few years, Dr 
Jon Helliwell, Project Manager of Fuel 
Cell Applications at the Centre for 
Process Innovation (CPI) has been 
engaged by AFC Energy to conduct 
periodic independent technical reviews. 
We believe these reports independently 
benchmark the progress of our 
technology. Reviews were conducted in 
May 2011 and January 2012, and the 
respective reports issued on 30 June 
2011 and 13 February. 

The following are extracts from his 
most recent report and sum up the 
technical progress achieved between 
May 2011 and January 2012:

Over the course of his reviews, the 
author has noted that AFC Energy has 
gradually developed a robust 
materials/electrode methodology and 
an effective and robust system 
development and engineering 
capability culminating in the Beta-
system design. The key development 
over the period is the establishment 
of two Beta systems at a customer site 
in Germany and a third on its own site 
in Dunsfold. These have run for 
significant periods of time and 
generated a lot of data. 

This has been an extremely significant 
period for AFC Energy. The author is 
highly encouraged that the company 
has frozen its system design, deployed 
it in the field and started to generate 
data that its customers can use. In an 
earlier review, the author stated that: 

‘The next phase of the development 
plan is a critical one for the company. It 
has to demonstrate the robustness of 
its Beta-system outside the laboratory 
environment and it has to ensure that it 
produces a lot of basic system data on 
both performance and durability.’

The author is highly encouraged by 
the actions of the company since the 
last review:
 •

It is demonstrating the robustness 
of its Beta-system outside the 
laboratory. 

 •

 •

 •

 •

It is producing a lot of basic 
system data.
It is sharing this data with a 
customer.
It has frozen its overall system 
designs.
It is generating highly useful 
feedback data in its trials that is 
enabling it to further optimise its 
systems.

The system has proved robust in 
operation and whilst there have been 
deviations from expected performance, 
the reasons for these have quickly been 
elucidated. The relationship with Akzo 
is clearly being managed properly and 
has progressed from a service provider/
customer relationship almost to that of 
development partners. AFC Energy 
agrees development plans with Akzo in 
advance of the work being performed 
and regularly communicates with the 
Akzo team. The author has reviewed a 
report summarising technical progress 
that was recently shared with Akzo. 
Indeed, the report was so thorough that 
the author felt that it was an internal 
report until told otherwise. This clearly 
demonstrates to the author the level of 
trust and buy-in that has been achieved 
with the customer.

The technical programme agreed with 
Akzo is realistic and this has undoubtedly 
increased the confidence of the 

07

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our BusinessOur Business

Operating and Financial Review continued

company has taken (particularly Gene 
Lewis) to build a strong team culture in 
a positive work environment.

Finally, the author firmly believes that 
AFC Energy is highly likely to deliver 
low cost, modular fuel cell systems to 
the stationary power industry. The 
systems are relatively simple, but use 
clever engineering and elegant design 
to minimise cost and complexity. The 
cells themselves have been designed 
for manufacture and are capable of 
using a range of materials. The 
organisation has examined its cost 
base in detail and is likely to increase 
the focus on cost moving forward. The 
technology is no longer simply a 
laboratory based technology and in 
what has been a very exciting period 
for the company, it is clearly starting to 
deliver the promise of its robust, low 
cost fuel cell systems.

The author therefore believes that the 
company is in a significantly stronger 
position than it was at the time of the last 
review and that it will deliver its 
technology in accordance with its stated 
technology and commercialisation plans.

The year has seen important progress 
in the transition of AFC Energy from a 
research and development 
organisation to a commercial company. 
The transition is not yet complete but 
technical progress has allowed the 
Company’s management to approve 
investment in a £180,000 production 
and process development capability 
for larger scale manufacturing since 
year end. The facility will enable the 
increased production of fuel cells with 
full cartridge assembly. In addition, it 
will provide an intermediate step 
between small-scale and high volume 
in-line production.

customer that AFC Energy will deliver on 
its promises. As the electrode design 
and the overall system design have 
effectively been frozen, it is now far 
easier for the organisation to focus on 
specific issues such as increasing the 
current density and durability of the fuel 
cell electrodes. In essence the 
development activities and 
manufacturing activities have been 
separated, but in such a way that they 
are not remote. This gives both areas a 
greater degree of focus. The 
improvements that have come from 
these initial field trials give the author a 
great deal of confidence that future Akzo 
milestones will be met.

The author would like to make the 
point that the AFC team has never 
been remote from manufacturing 
needs or the manufacturability of the 
product. The team has always 
recognised the need to produce 
products capable of low cost and 
volume manufacture with processes 
that are not unduly complicated or 
bespoke. Ian Williamson is 
undoubtedly correct in asserting that 
the organisation now needs to 
develop a Production and 
Manufacturing capability to meet its 
ongoing and future requirements. The 
author believes that Ian Williamson 
will ensure that the organisation 
becomes a manufacturing house and 
he sees this as an extremely positive 
development. This will allow the 
organisation to deliver its current 
milestones for Akzo and build 
production capability in parallel.

On the team front, it would have been 
understandable if progress had faltered 
during the senior personnel changes 
last year. What is highly encouraging is 
the fact that the technical team 
remained focused on their delivery 
plans. The author has commented in 
previous reviews on the steps the 

08

Financial Highlights
AFC Energy has continued to adopt a 
prudent approach to managing its 
cash resources against a backdrop of 
global economic uncertainty. It 
continually reviews cash balances and 
forward requirements and seeks to 
ensure that an adequate funding 
horizon is maintained whilst 
minimising shareholder dilution from 
additional fundraising. The Board was 
therefore very pleased to be able to 
take the opportunity to raise a total of 
£3.93 million after expenses by the 
placing of 9,999,555 new shares at 40 
pence per share, largely with existing 
investors, including Linc Energy Ltd.

The cash outflow from operating 
activities increased by £0.69 million 
compared to the previous year, largely 
as a result of a £0.38 million increase 
in R&D expenditure, connected with 
the construction of the first Beta 
systems and increased activity and 
expenditure on protection of its 
intellectual property and registration 
of patents.

AFC Energy continued to invest in 
equipment required for production of 
fuel cells and also expanded its fuel 
cell testing capability with a view to 
maintaining the flow of future 
generations of fuel cells. Total 
investment for the year was £0.58 
million.

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
Our Business
01

Who we are

02

06

12

18

Chairman’s Statement

Operating and Financial Review

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

We have ensured that the strategic 
plans set out for the Company have 
aligned the commerical and technical 
aims of the business via a set of 
focused targets for the coming 
period:

1  Deliver on our set of defined goals  
for the fuel cell system trials with  

  AkzoNobel.
2  Transfer electrode production from  
technical staff to manufacturing  
staff.

3  Expand, in a controlled way, the  
  number of ‘partner’ customers.  
  Where we have existing  

relationships we either progress  
them or move on.

4  Gain experience of more hydrogen  
  production methods and  
integration requirements.

5  Position the Company to access  
  other international markets.

At the year end, AFC Energy 
undertook a comprehensive review of 
fixed and intangible assets. It 
concluded that impairment of £30,000 
has arisen in respect of equipment 
and that certain of the specific 
intellectual property and patents, 
consisting mainly of items acquired 
from Eneco in 2006, were no longer 
core to AFC Energy’s development 
and will not contribute significantly to 
revenue generation in the future. This 
resulted in an impairment charge of 
£191,379.

A combination of these asset write-
downs, the increased R&D 
expenditure and consultancy support 
related to manufacturing scale-up 
account for the increase in 
administrative expenses for the year. 
Although no further options or 
warrants were issued during the year 
the charge to the income statement 
under IFRS 2 relating to historic 
options and warrants increased to 
£690,472. This is not a cash cost. 
Taken together with the increased 
administrative expenses described, 
this accounts for the increase in 
operating loss compared with the 
previous year.

Looking ahead, AFC Energy does not 
anticipate a significant change in the 
costs of its development activities or 
the investment required for pilot scale 
manufacturing.

The fall in revenue compared to prior 
year reflects the fact that the 
Company did not make a delivery of a 
fully customer funded system in the 
year, instead focusing its development 
resources on the trial of the Beta 
system with its development partner 
AkzoNobel. 

Intellectual Property
AFC Energy continues to generate 
intellectual property as a result of its 
research and development activities. 
The Company regularly reviews this 
intellectual property to determine its 
value and the best way to protect it. 
AFC Energy is currently pursuing 12 
families of patents with two filed since 
the last annual report and others in 
preparation.

AFC Energy endeavours to anticipate 
future technical developments in the 
field of alkaline fuel cells and to apply 
for patent protection for inventions 
which are likely to be incorporated in 
future generations of its products. In 
January 2012 AFC Energy was 
delighted to recruit renowned fuel cell 
scientist Naveed Akhtar to help 
ensure that AFC Energy continues to 
secure the optimal intellectual 
property position going forward.

Health and Safety
The health and safety of our 
employees and those we work with is 
regularly reviewed by and on behalf of 
the Board.

Commercial Outlook
AFC Energy is on track to drive forward 
the process of commercialisation.

It is a critical time for any company, as it 
translates its technical excellence into 
commercial success. Where we need 
additional support we will add resource, 
whilst ensuring expenditure overall is 
carefully targeted and controlled. It is 
particularly encouraging that the 
Company has attracted a world class 
fuel cell scientist, Naveed Akhtar, to the 
team. Naveed’s experience is already 
contributing to the technical 
developments at AFC Energy.

09

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our Business 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our Business

Operating and Financial Review continued

AFC Energy occupies a very clear 
space within the fuel cell and future 
energy landscape. We believe our 
technology will develop into one of 
the lowest cost, most efficient fuel 
conversion mechanisms available. 
Great strides continue to be made in 
development terms but also we see 
increased activity from many 
interested future customers that 
understand the potential of AFC 
Energy’s technology and are seeking 
to apply it to their own needs.

The Company remains focused on the 
chlorine industry as its first commercial 
market; identified as the most likely 
for AFC Energy’s fuel cells to be able 
to offer the most efficient, robust 
energy conversion system for that 
industry. We achieved an important 
goal this year by beginning our scaled 
Beta testing at AkzoNobel and we 
have already generated significant 
amounts of valuable data. These trials 
will continue during the current year 
as further system derivations are 
tested and assessed with our partner.

One area of our testing is 
demonstrating that the design of the 
Beta Systems which has a low lifetime 
cost of ownership is easy to 
manufacture, install, operate and 
maintain using a relatively low skilled 
workforce. This we believe will greatly 
increase the accessible international 
market for AFC Energy’s alkaline fuel 
cell product.

Our commercial strategy remains 
largely focused around the ESCo 
model under which AFC Energy 
would obtain financing to build and 
supply fuel cell systems to a customer 
and then share the revenue generated 
by the installed equipment. Our 
financial modelling shows that there is 
a distinct benefit to the Company 
from doing this, especially as we 
expect, over time, that new 
generations of fuel cell cartridges will 
be increasingly lower cost per kilowatt 
hour of electricity generated and that 
our fuel cells will be retrofitted to 
already installed fuel cell systems.

The models show that payback can be 
expected to be achieved relatively 
quickly from sales of electricity 
generated. In some applications, the 
water and heat produced by the fuel 
cell system may also have a 
considerable value. This model 
appears attractive to chlorine 
manufacturers that AFC Energy has 
engaged in discussions with and we 
believe AFC Energy will have a highly 
attractive commercial product.

In addition, AFC Energy continues to 
work with partners to open other 
channels to market.

The Company took a 25% stake in 
Waste2Tricity Limited (Waste2Tricity) 
in June 2009 and continues to see 
both political support and commercial 
opportunities to help resolve the 
waste issues facing the UK. 

Waste2Tricity’s involvement with Air 
Products plc via the latter’s plans for a 
350,000MT/year waste-to-energy 
plant in Teesside, UK, continues. The 
plant remains a potential 
demonstration opportunity for AFC 
Energy’s alkaline fuel cell technology 
alongside conventional generating 
technologies. Waste2Tricity expects 
that its involvement in this project will 
enable it to purchase an exclusive UK 
licence for the Company’s fuel cell 
technology for use in the conversion 
of waste into electricity. The 
government’s review into the support 
for green energy provision in the UK 
has delayed the decision making 
progress somewhat, although it has 
highlighted the opportunity to the 
marketplace and other projects are 
also being progressed by 
Waste2Tricity. We are pleased that 
Waste2Tricity has been able to repay 
its loan in full. 

We continue to work with Linc Energy 
(ASX:LNC), a 12% shareholder in AFC 
Energy and our partner for clean 
power generation in the underground 
coal gasification market. Whilst 
opportunities to facilitate further 
demonstrations for this market 
segment have been limited during the 
year, we are currently working 
together on the next steps in our 
plans.

10

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01

Who we are

02

06

12

18

Chairman’s Statement

Operating and Financial Review

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

There are many other markets open to 
AFC Energy although we 
acknowledge that government 
funding support is frequently 
necessary to open these markets up 
fully and to equalise the playing-field 
vs. existing, mature, power generation 
options. To that end, AFC Energy has 
been active in both the European and 
national fuel cell targeted funding 
calls to leverage its near-term 
commercialisation plans. It should be 
noted that, in most cases, it is not the 
costs associated with the fuel cell 
which need support, but the delivery 
of the hydrogen itself. 

A large step forward was taken by the 
Company this year with the award by 
the Joint Technology Initiative of 
funding support for the Laser-Cell 
development project. The Laser-Cell 
project received a grant of €1.4 million 
to pursue the investigation of 
electrode design/manufacture. AFC 
Energy’s share of the grant is 
€405,600. The project has raised AFC 
Energy’s European profile and 
heightened its credibility within 
funding circles.

We held two open days for investors 
to visit and were delighted by both 
the response and the positive 
feedback we received from these 
events. We understand the desire for 
information concerning the 
Company’s plans and future. To this 
end we have decided to change the 
way we manage our communications 
and to move our external support 
provision to Luther Pendragon. We 
believe Luther can offer us a more 
joined up approach as they provide 
both financial and commercial 
communication services. This should 
lead to more information being 
available via increased variety of 
mechanisms.

We look forward to continuing to 
deliver real progress on AFC Energy’s 
drive to commercialisation.

Ian Williamson
Chief Executive Officer
29 February 2012

11

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our BusinessOur Business

Directors’ Report

The Directors present their report together with the audited financial statements for the year ended 31 October 2011. 
The comparative period was from 1 November 2009 to 31 October 2010.

Principal activity and review of business developments
The principal activity of AFC Energy plc (or ‘the Company’) is the development of fuel cells.

Reviews of operations, business developments and current projects are included in the Chairman’s Statement and the 
Operating and Financial Review.

Results and dividend
The results for the year are set out in the Statement of Comprehensive Income on page 20.

No dividends were paid in the year. The Directors do not intend to declare a dividend in respect of the year.

Principal risks and uncertainties
The major risk faced by the business relates to the technical progress in development of the commercial fuel cell system 
and the fulfilment of contractual obligations with AkzoNobel. Financial risks include the risk of additional development 
expenditure being required to produce a commercial product. The Company’s approach to the management of these 
risks is described in the Operating and Financial Review.

Key performance indicators
Given the nature of the business and that the Company is in the development phase of its products, the Directors are of the 
opinion that analysis using financial KPIs is not appropriate for an understanding of the development, performance or 
position of the business at this time. However, the Directors constantly review overall expenditure compared to budget and 
the Company’s cash position. At 31 October 2011, the Company’s cash balance was in line with the target set.

Cash and cash equivalents at the year end

Directors and their interests
The Directors who served during the year were:

2011
£

5,968,429

2010
£
5,345,716

Tim Yeo 
Ian Balchin 
Dr Gene Lewis 
David Marson 
Mitchell Field 
Simon Hunt 
David Smith 
Ed Wilson 
Ian Williamson 

Non-Executive Chairman
Deputy Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer (CEO prior to 21 February 2011)
Technical Director
Finance Director
Non-Executive
Non-Executive
Non-Executive (appointed 22 September 2011)
Managing Director (appointed 21 February 2011, resigned 27 May 2011)
Chief Executive Officer (appointed 7 November 2011)

A Director appointed during or after the year must stand for reappointment at the first Annual General Meeting after 
such appointment. Accordingly, David Smith and Ian Williamson offer themselves for reappointment. In addition, Tim 
Yeo is required to retire by rotation in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association and, being eligible, offers 
himself for reappointment.

12

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

On 31 October 2011 the beneficial interests of Directors and their families in the equity share capital of the Company were:

Tim Yeo
Ian Balchin
David Marson
Dr Gene Lewis
Mitchell Field
Simon Hunt
David Smith

On 31 October 2011 the Directors’ interests over share capital of the Company were:

Number of 
Ordinary
shares
of 0.1p
2011

377,272
50,000
50,000
10,000
2,210,027
–
–

Number of 
Ordinary 
shares
of 0.1p
2010
377,272
50,000
50,000
10,000
2,117,027
–
–

Options/
Warrants
granted
in year
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

1 Nov
2010
1,500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,306,000
500,000
586,000
1,000,000
1,954,000
350,000
750,000
500,000

Options/
Warrants
lapsed
in year

31 Oct
2011

– 1,500,000
– 1,000,000
– 1,500,000
– 2,306,000
500,000
–
–
586,000
– 1,000,000
– 1,954,000
350,000
–
750,000
–
500,000
–

Tim Yeo

Ian Balchin

David Marson

Dr Gene Lewis

Mitchell Field

Simon Hunt

Exercise
price

Date
from which
exercisable

Expiry
Type
date
Warrant
£0.031 18/04/2012 17/04/2019
Warrant
£0.240 14/04/2013 13/04/2020
Warrant
£0.031 18/04/2012 17/04/2019
Warrant
£0.240 14/04/2013 13/04/2020
Warrant
£0.031 18/04/2012 17/04/2019
£0.240 14/04/2013 13/04/2020
Warrant
£0.031 18/04/2012 17/04/2019 EMI option
Warrant
£0.240 14/04/2013 13/04/2020
Warrant
£0.031 18/04/2012 17/04/2019
Warrant
£0.240 14/04/2013 13/04/2020
Warrant
£0.240 14/04/2013 13/04/2020

Note: 
David Smith had no interest over share capital during the reporting period. Ian Williamson was appointed on  
7 November 2011 and was granted one million options to subscribe for shares of 0.1p each in the capital of the 
Company at an exercise price of 32 pence per share.

13

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our BusinessOur Business

Directors’ Report continued

Directors’ remuneration

Name
Tim Yeo
Ian Balchin
David Marson (see note 24)
Dr Gene Lewis
Mitchell Field (see note 24)
Simon Hunt (see note 24)
David Smith (see note 24)
Ed Wilson (see note 24)

Share-based
payment
expense
£
59,290
136,723
34,744
120,949
44,467
29,645
–
–

Bonus
£
–
50,000
–
–
–
–
–
–

Other
compensation
£

–
2,387
70,318
3,293
14,583
31,417
1,667
29,020

Total
2011
£

104,290
309,110
105,062
232,575
59,050
61,062
1,667
29,020

Total
2010
£
111,927
269,047
89,296
218,624
46,250
42,728
–
–

Salary
£
45,000
120,000
–
108,333
–
–
–
–

Directors’ service contracts
Tim Yeo was appointed as Chairman and Non-Executive Director under the terms of a Non-Executive letter dated 
20 February 2007 for an indefinite term, subject to a minimum of six months’ notice.

Ian Williamson’s services are provided under a service agreement with the Company dated 7 November 2011 for an 
indefinite term, subject to six months’ notice by either party.

Ian Balchin’s services are provided under a service agreement with the Company dated 17 February 2011 for an indefinite 
term, subject to twelve months’ notice by the Company and six months’ notice by the Executive.

David Marson’s services are provided under an agreement between the Company and Hudson Raine Ltd dated 8 June 
2011, subject to three months’ notice by either party (see also note 24).

Dr Gene Lewis’s services are provided under a service agreement with the Company dated 3 June 2011 for an indefinite 
term, subject to twelve months’ notice by either party.

Mitchell Field’s services as a Non-Executive Director are provided under the terms of a Non-Executive letter dated  
10 April 2008 for an indefinite term, subject to a minimum of six months’ notice (see also note 24).

Simon Hunt’s services as a Non-Executive Director are provided under an agreement between the Company and 
Cornerstone Capital Ltd dated 13 April 2010, subject to a minimum of six months’ notice (see also note 24).

David Smith’s services as a Non-Executive Director are provided under an agreement between the Company and Linc 
Energy Ltd dated 2 September 2011, subject to a minimum of six months’ notice (see also note 24).

Board changes
Details of changes to the membership of the Board are disclosed in note 22 to the financial statements.

14

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Capital structure
Details of the Company’s share capital are disclosed in notes 16 and 17 the financial statements.

Shareholder funds have been used for the development and testing of an alpha fuel cell system, and latterly the beta 
fuel system that will become the Company’s initial commercial product.

On 29 February 2012, the Company was aware of the following holdings of 3% or more in the Company’s issued share 
capital:

Age of Reason Foundation
Linc Energy
TD Direct Investing Nominees (Europe) Limited
Barclayshare Nominees Limited
Eturab Trade Corporation
Harry Epstein
LR Nominees Limited
Hargreaves Landsdown (Nominees) Limited

Political and charitable donations
Charitable donations in the year amounted to nil (2010: nil).

Approximate
percentage
of the
Company’s
issued
share capital
(12.33%)
(12.00%)
(6.65%)
(5.51%)
(4.64%)
(3.82%)
(3.51%)
(3.33%)

Number
of shares
22,602,420
22,000,705
12,194,559
10,103,013
8,500,000
7,000,000
6,427,844
6,097,824

Corporate governance
The Directors seek, as far as is considered appropriate having regard to the size and nature of activities of the Company, 
to comply with the Combined Code on Corporate Governance applicable to listed companies. The Board is assisted in 
this regard by a number of committees with delegated authority.

The Company’s organisational structure has clearly documented and communicated levels of responsibility, delegated 
authority and reporting procedures. The professionalism and competence of employees is maintained through 
recruitment, performance appraisal, written job descriptions and personal training and development plans. The Board 
supports the highest levels of commitment and integrity from employees. Expected standards of behaviour are set out in 
the Staff Handbook, a copy of which is given to all employees.

Audit Committee
The Company’s Audit Committee members during the financial year were Mitchell Field (chairman), Tim Yeo and Simon 
Hunt. The Committee meets at least twice a year and at any other time when it is appropriate to discuss audit, 
accounting or control issues.

15

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our BusinessOur Business

Directors’ Report continued

The Committee’s principal responsibilities are:

 •

 •
 •
 •

 •
 •

to monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the Company, reviewing the annual and interim financial 
statements to ensure that they present a balanced assessment of the Company’s position;
to review accounting policies;
to review with management and the Company’s external Auditor the effectiveness of internal controls;
to oversee the publication of reserve and resource statements to ensure compliance with best practice under AIM 
rules;
to review with the Company’s external Auditor the scope and results of their audit;
to oversee the relationship with the Auditor.

The Auditor attends meetings of the Committee except when their appointment or performance is being reviewed. 
Executive Directors attend as and when appropriate.

Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee’s members during the financial year were Simon Hunt (chairman), Tim Yeo and Mitchell 
Field. The Committee reviews the performance of the Executive Directors and sets the scale and structure of their 
remuneration and the basis of their service agreements. In determining remuneration, the Committee seeks to enable 
the Company to attract and retain Executives of the highest calibre. The Committee also makes recommendations to the 
Board concerning allocation of share options to employees. No Directors participate in discussions or decisions 
concerning their own remuneration. This Committee is also responsible for nominating candidates, for the approval of 
the Board, to fill either Executive or Non-Executive vacancies or additional appointments to the Board.

Details of the Directors’ remuneration, service agreements and their interests in the share capital of the Company are 
disclosed in the Directors’ Report.

AIM Rules Compliance Committee
The AIM Rules Compliance Committee comprises Tim Yeo, Simon Hunt and Mitchell Field and meets as appropriate. 
The Committee monitors internal procedures, resources and controls to enable the Company to comply with AIM rules.

Payments to creditors
The Company’s policy is to settle the terms of payment with its suppliers when agreeing the terms of each transaction, 
either by accepting the suppliers’ terms or by making the suppliers aware of alternative terms, and to abide by the 
agreed terms. Trade creditors of the Company at 31 October 2011 represented 44 days (2010: 40 days) of annual 
purchases.

Liability insurance for Company officers
The Company maintains Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance cover for its Directors and officers to the extent 
permitted under the Companies Act 2006.

Financial risk management objectives
These are detailed in note 20 to the financial statements.

Research and development
The Company invests substantially in research and development and makes claims under the Government’s R&D tax 
credit scheme. In the year to 31 October 2011, relevant expenditure totalled £1,429,164 (2010: £1,053,371).

16

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Going concern
The Company raised £3,922,572 after expenses in July 2011. The Directors are satisfied that the Company has sufficient 
resources to continue its operations and to meet its commitments for the foreseeable future.

Post-balance sheet events
Details of post-balance sheet events are provided in note 22 to the financial statements.

Relations with Shareholders
The Board attaches great importance to maintaining good relationships with Shareholders. The Board regards the 
Annual General Meeting as an opportunity to communicate directly with investors, who are encouraged to attend and 
participate.

Auditor
A resolution to reappoint the Auditor of the Company, Jeffreys Henry LLP, will be proposed at the forthcoming Annual 
General Meeting. Jeffreys Henry LLP have expressed their willingness to continue as Auditor of the Company.

This report was approved by the Board of Directors on 29 February 2012.

David Marson
Company Secretary

17

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our BusinessOur Business

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Tim Yeo
Tim Yeo has been MP for South 
Suffolk since 1983. He held 
various Ministerial posts under 
Margaret Thatcher and John 
Major, including Minister of 
State at the Department of the 
Environment. Between 1998 and 
2005 he was a member of the 
Shadow Cabinet, shadowing a 
record seven different 
departments. Between 2005 and 
2010 he was Chair of the 
Environmental Audit Committee 
and since 2010 he has been the 
chairman of the ECC Select 
Committee. Tim holds a number 
of non-executive directorships in 
the energy and health sectors 
including Univent plc and ITI 
Energy Ltd. He was appointed 
chairman of AFC Energy in 2007.

Ian Williamson
Ian has significant experience 
within the industrial gas sector 
with Air Products particularly 
centred on the manufacture, 
provision, distribution and 
commercial sale of Hydrogen. He 
is very well known in the industry 
and his external positions include 
President of the European 
Hydrogen Association, Vice 
President of PATH (the 
Partnership for the Transition to 
Hydrogen), Director of CENEX 
(the UK’s Centre of Excellence for 
Low Carbon and Fuel Cell 
Technologies) and Board 
Member of the UK Hydrogen 
and Fuel Cell Association. Most 
recently Ian has been leading Air 
Products’ new venture into the 
renewable energy market and 
has been instrumental in 
obtaining planning permission 
for the proposed 49.9MW 
advanced gasification power 
plant to be built in Teesside.

Ian Balchin
Ian was CEO of Stanelco plc for 
five years during which time the 
company acquired Biotec 
Holdings. Prior to this Ian held 
senior management positions at 
AEA Technology, including 
director of New Ventures. Ian 
also has interests in polymer 
businesses, a technology 
commercialisation company and 
investments in several 
businesses focused on materials 
and material processing.

David Marson
David has been working with the 
Company since November 2008 as 
financial management consultant 
helping to improve its financial 
systems and business processes. 
He has an extensive track record in 
the financial and operational 
management of small and 
medium sized technology based 
businesses, having worked at AEA 
Technology plc where he held 
various senior roles as a divisional 
General Manager and as divisional 
Finance Director. In this period he 
was instrumental in the spin-out of 
a number of successful ventures, 
including Forensic Alliance Ltd, 
now a part of LGC Forensics, and 
Synexus Ltd, the clinical trials 
patient recruitment organisation. 
He also held a number of 
Non-Executive Directorships, 
including Benitec Ltd, a bio-
technology start-up company now 
listed on ASX. 

Directors
Tim Yeo
Ian Williamson
Ian Balchin
Mitchell Field
Simon Hunt
Dr Gene Lewis
David Marson (Company Secretary)
David Smith

Registered office
Finsgate
5–7 Cranwood Street
London
EC1V 9EE
Registered in England: 05668788

Financial Advisor, NOMAD and 
Broker
Allenby Capital plc
32 Davies Street
Mayfair
London
W1K 4ND

Bankers
Barclays Bank PLC
40/41 High Street
Chelmsford
Essex
CM1 1BE

Principal place of business
Unit 71.4 Dunsfold Park
Stovolds Hill
Cranleigh
Surrey
GU6 8TB
Tel: 01483 276726
Fax: 01483 266839

18

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
 
Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Gene Lewis
Dr Gene Lewis joined the 
Company in November 2008 as 
Chief Technical Officer, having 
previously worked at Ceres 
Power where he was 
instrumental in the development 
of their solid oxide fuel cell 
technology. Gene’s leadership 
skills and his background in fuel 
cell material science and 
engineering have significantly 
strengthened the technical 
team. Gene has overseen AFC 
Energy’s technical programme 
since February 2009.

Mitchell Field
Mitchell owns Richards and 
Appleby Limited, the company 
is engaged in the manufacture, 
sales and distribution of 
branded toiletries and 
cosmetics. Among these are 
well-known heritage brands, 
including ‘Cyclax’ which holds a 
Royal Warrant from Her Majesty 
the Queen. His principal role is 
sales and marketing, dealing 
with blue-chip companies in the 
UK and exporting to over 60 
companies internationally. 
Mitchell has investments and 
management interests in 
fashion, restaurants, property 
development, and importation 
and trading companies, and 
lives in South Wales.

David Smith
David is Chief Operating Officer 
and President of Australian 
Operations at Linc Energy with 
responsibilities of technology 
development and 
demonstration, exploration, 
procurement and people. He is 
also a representative Linc Energy 
director at the Yerostigaz 
Underground Coal Gasification 
(UCG) facility in Uzbekistan. 
David has an Engineer honours 
degree, Masters of Business & 
Administration and is a fellow of 
the Australian Institute of 
Company Directors. Adam 
Bond, President – European 
Operations at Linc Energy, will 
act as Linc Energy’s alternate 
director when required. Adam is 
responsible for the development 
and delivery of Linc Energy’s 
European expansion in the 
United Kingdom, mainland 
Europe and Russia.

Simon Hunt
Simon trained as a corporate 
lawyer, specialising in corporate 
finance and M&A (Macfarlanes 
and Gouldens, now Jones Day), 
before moving into venture 
capital management with 
Gartmore Investment 
Management Limited, focusing 
mainly on technology businesses 
in the US. He later added public 
company operational 
experience and investment 
banking including corporate 
finance, fund raising and M&A. 
Simon has worked with 
companies at all stages of their 
development both in the UK and 
the US. He is a founder and 
Executive Chairman of IPSO 
Ventures plc which is an 
innovation investment company 
and non-executive Chairman of 
GEM Biofuels plc and Strathdon 
Investments plc as well as a 
number of private companies.

Registrars
Computershare Investor Services PLC
The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol
BS99 6ZY

Auditor
Jeffreys Henry LLP
Finsgate
5–7 Cranwood Street
London
EC1V 9EE

Solicitors
Eversheds LLP
1 Wood Street
London
EC2V 7WS

19

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our Business 
 
 
Our Business

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and financial statements in accordance with applicable 
law and International Financial Reporting Standards.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial period. Under that law the 
Directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting 
Standards as adopted for use in the European Union. The financial statements are required by law to give a true and fair 
view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for that period. In preparing those 
financial statements, the Directors are required to:

select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

 •
 • make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
 •

state whether applicable accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and 
explained in the financial statements; and

 • prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company 

will continue in business.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any 
time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the 
Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking 
reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website (www.afcenergy.com) and 
legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from 
legislation in other jurisdictions.

Statement of disclosure to Auditor
So far as the Directors are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s Auditor is unaware, and 
each Director has taken all the steps that he ought to have taken as Director in order to make himself aware of any 
relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s Auditor is aware of that information.

20

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Independent Auditor’s Report to the
Shareholders of AFC Energy plc

We have audited the financial statements of AFC Energy plc for the year ended 31 October 2011 which comprise the 
Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Financial Position, the Cash Flow Statement, the Statement of 
Changes in Equity and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is 
applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the 
Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those 
matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted 
by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a 
body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

Respective responsibilities of Directors and Auditors
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities set out on page 18, the Directors are responsible for the 
preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and 
express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK 
and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s (APB’s) Ethical Standards for Auditors.

Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give 
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. 
This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances and 
have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made 
by the Directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements.

In addition, we read all financial and non-financial information in the Chairman’s Statement, the Operating and Financial 
Review and the Directors’ Report to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. If we become 
aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.

Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the financial statements:

 • give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 31 October 2011 and of its loss for the year then ended;
 • have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union; and
 • have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion:

 •

the information given in the Directors’ Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is 
consistent with the financial statements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

adequate accounting records have not been kept; or
 •
the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
 •
 •
certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
 • we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

Jonathan Isaacs
(Senior statutory Auditor) Date 29 February 2012
for and on behalf of Jeffreys Henry LLP, Statutory Auditor
Chartered Accountants & Registered Auditors
Finsgate, 5–7 Cranwood Street, London, EC1V 9EE

21

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

Statement of Comprehensive Income

for the year ended 31 October 2011

Revenue
Cost of sales

Gross profit

Other income
Administrative expenses
Analysed as:
Administrative expenses
Equity-settled share-based payments

Operating loss

Financial income

Loss before tax

Taxation

Loss for the financial year and total comprehensive loss attributable to 
owners of the Company

Basic loss per share
Diluted loss per share

All amounts relate to continuing operations.

The notes on pages 24 to 39 form part of these financial statements.

Year ended
31 October
2011
£

35,468
27,498

Year ended
31 October
2010
(restated)
£
180,607
–

Note

7,970

180,607

3,996
(4,402,158)

3,996
(3,236,371)

(3,711,686)
(690,472)

(2,708,666)
(527,705)

17c

5

(4,390,192)

(3,051,768)

 8

10

11
11

44,930

30,461

(4,345,262)

(3,021,307)

354,822

250,358

(3,990,440)

(2,770,949)

(2.26)p
(2.26)p

(1.87)p
(1.87)p

22

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Financial Position

as at 31 October 2011

Assets
Non-current assets
Intangible assets
Property and equipment
Investment in associate

Current assets
Work in progress
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents

Total assets

Capital and reserves attributable to owners of the Company
Share capital
Share premium
Other reserve
Retained deficit

Total equity attributable to Shareholders

Current liabilities
Trade and other payables

Total equity and liabilities

31 October
2011
£

Note

31 October
2010
(restated)
£

12
13
9a

149,498
824,264
2,500

976,262

318,851
632,657
2,500

954,008

9b & 14
15

96,242
734,684
5,968,429

123,740
569,924
5,345,716

6,799,355

6,039,380

7,775,617

6,993,388

16

183,339
18,966,789
1,820,485
(13,721,105)

173,339
15,044,217
1,130,013
(9,730,665)

7,249,508

6,616,904

18

526,109

526,109

376,484

376,484

7,775,617

6,993,388

The notes on pages 24 to 39 form part of these financial statements.

These financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board on 29 February 2012.

Tim Yeo 
Chairman 

David Marson
Finance Director

AFC Energy plc
Registered number: 05668788

23

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our Financials 
Our Financials

Statement of Changes in Equity

for the year ended 31 October 2011

Balance at 1 November 2009 (restated)
Loss after tax for the year

Total recognised in income and expense
for the year
Issue of equity shares
Share issue expenses
Equity-settled share-based payments

Share
Capital
£
127,683
–

–
45,656
–
–

Share
Premium
£
8,940,379
–

–
6,298,863
(195,025)
–

Other
Reserve
£
602,308
–

–
–
–
527,705

Retained
Loss
£
(6,959,716)
(2,770,949)

Total
Equity
£
2,710,654
(2,770,949)

(2,770,949)
–
–
–

(2,770,949)
6,344,519
(195,025)
527,705

Balance at 31 October 2010 (restated)

173,339

15,044,217

1,130,013

(9,730,665)

6,616,904

Loss after tax for the year

–

–

–

(3,990,440)

(3,990,440)

Total recognised in income and expense
for the year
Issue of equity shares
Share issue expenses
Equity-settled share-based payments

–
10,000
–
–

–
3,989,822
(67,250)
–

–
–
–
690,472

(3,990,440)
–
–
–

(3,990,440)
3,999,822
(67,250)
690,472

Balance at 31 October 2011

183,339 18,966,789

1,820,485 (13,721,105)

7,249,508

Share capital is the amount subscribed for shares at nominal value.

Share premium represents the excess of the amount subscribed for share capital over the nominal value of these shares 
net of share issue expenses.

Other reserve represents the credit to equity in respect of equity-settled share-based payments.

Retained earnings represent the cumulative loss of the Company attributable to equity Shareholders.

24

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.comOur Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

Cash Flow Statement

for the year ended 31 October 2011

Cash flows from operating activities
Loss before tax for the year
Adjustments for:
Depreciation and amortisation
Loss on disposal of plant and equipment
Impairment of plant and equipment
Impairment of intangible assets
Equity-settled share-based payment expenses
Finance income

Cash flows from operating activities before changes 
in working capital and provisions
Corporation tax received
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other payables

Cash absorbed by operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of plant and equipment
Acquisitions of patents
Interest received

Net cash absorbed by investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from the issue of share capital
Costs of issue of share capital

Net cash from financing activities

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at start of year

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 October

31 October
2011
£

Note

31 October
2010
(restated)
£

(4,345,262)

(3,021,307)

377,258
–
30,000
191,379
690,472
(44,930)

284,173
2,765
–
–
527,705
(30,461)

17c

(3,101,083)
258,076
(40,516)
149,625

(2,237,125)
220,643
(83,565)
57,059

(2,733,898)

(2,042,988)

13
12
8

(577,796)
(43,094)
44,930

(575,960)

(630,543)
(29,308)
30,461

(629,390)

3,999,822
(67,250)

6,344,519
(195,025)

3,932,572

6,149,494

622,713
5,345,716

3,477,115
1,868,601

15

5,968,429

5,345,716

25

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

1.  Corporate information
AFC Energy plc (‘the Company’) is a public limited company incorporated in England & Wales and quoted on the 
Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange.

The address of its registered office is Finsgate, 5–7 Cranwood Street, London, EC1V 9EE.

2.  Basis of preparation and accounting policies
These consolidated financial statements of AFC Energy plc have been prepared in accordance with International Financial 
Reporting Standards (IFRSs), International Accounting Standards (IASs) and International Financial Reporting Interpretations 
Committee (IFRIC) interpretations (collectively ‘IFRSs’) as adopted for use in the European Union and as issued by the 
International Accounting Standards Board and with those parts of the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies 
reporting under IFRS.

The accounting policies set out below have, unless otherwise stated, been applied consistently in these financial statements.

The comparative period from 1 November 2009 to 31 October 2010 has been restated to reverse the previous equity 
accounting treatment of investment in Waste2Tricity. This has reduced the prior year loss after tax by £17,781 and 
increased the total equity attributable to Shareholders at 31 October 2010 by £44,432.

Judgements made by the Directors in the application of these accounting policies that have significant effect on the 
financial statements and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustment in the next year are discussed in note 3.

a.  New and amended standards adopted by the Company
 •

Amendment to IAS 32 ‘Classification of Rights Issues’ (effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 
1 February 2010). This amendment has been endorsed for use in the EU.

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

Amendment to IFRS 1 ‘Additional Exemptions for First-time Adopters’ (effective for accounting periods beginning 
on or after 1 January 2010). This amendment has been endorsed for use in the EU.

IFRIC 19 ‘Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments’ (effective for accounting periods beginning on 
or after 1 July 2010). This interpretation has been endorsed for use in the EU.

IFRS 2 (Amended) ‘Group Cash-settled Share-based Payment Transactions’ (effective for accounting periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2010). This was endorsed by the EU on 23 March 2010.

IFRS 7 (amended) ‘Limited exemption from Comparative IFRS 7 Disclosures for first time adopters’ (effective for 
accounting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2010). This amendment has been endorsed for use in the EU.

The IASB 2009 annual improvement project includes further minor amendments to various accounting standards 
and is effective from various dates from 1 January 2010 onwards. This was endorsed by the EU on 23 March 2010.

b.  Standards, amendments and interpretations to published standards not yet effective
At the date of authorisation of these consolidated financial statements, the IASB and IFRIC have issued the following 
standards and interpretations which are effective for annual accounting periods beginning on or after the stated effective 
date. These standards and interpretations are not effective for and have not been applied in the preparation of these 
consolidated financial statements:

 •

Amendment to IFRIC 14 ‘Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement’ (effective for accounting periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2011). This amendment has not yet been endorsed for use in the EU.

26

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

2.  Basis of preparation and accounting policies continued
 •

Revised IAS 24 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ (effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011). 
This revision has not yet been endorsed for use in the EU.

 •

 •

 •

 •

 •

IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ (effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013). This standard 
has not yet been endorsed for use in the EU.

IFRS 7 ‘Financial instruments: disclosures (amendment)’  is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 
2011. The amendments requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures relating to transfers of financial 
assets, where financial assets are derecognised in their entirety, but where the entity has a continuing involvement 
in them and where financial assets are not derecognised in their entirety. The adoption of this will have no effect on 
the financial statements of the Company.

IAS 12 ‘Income taxes (amendment) – Deferred taxes: recovery of underlying assets’, is effective for annual periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2012. It introduces a rebuttable presumption that deferred tax on investment 
properties measured at fair value will be derecognised on a sale basis, unless an entity has a business model that 
would indicate the investment property will be consumed in the business. If consumed a use basis would need 
to be adopted. The amendments also introduce the requirement that deferred tax on non-depreciable assets 
measured using the revaluation model in IAS 16 should always be measured on a sale basis. The adoption of this 
interpretation will have no effect on the financial statements of the Company.

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements, IFRS 12 Disclosures of Interests with 
Other Entities along with related amendments to IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements and IAS 28 Investments in 
Associates and Joint Ventures will have an effective date of 1 January 2013. Early adoption of these standards is 
permitted, but only if all five are early adopted together. The Company does not expect the adoption of this to have 
a significant impact on its financial position and performance.

Improvements to IFRS (issued in May 2010). The IASB issued improvement to IFRSs, an omnibus of amendments to 
its IFRS standards. The amendments have not been adopted as they become effective for annual periods on or after 
1 January 2011 or 1 July 2010. The amendments listed below are considered to have a reasonable possible impact 
on the Company:

IFRS 3 Business combinations
IFRS 7 Financial instruments: disclosures
IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements
IAS 27 Consolidated and separate financial statements
IFRIC 13 Customer loyalty programmes
IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting

The Company expects no impact from the adoption of the above amendments on its financial position or performance.

c.  Capital Policy
The Company manages its equity as capital. Equity comprises the items detailed within the principal accounting policy 
for equity and financial details can be found in the Statement of Financial Position. The Company adheres to the capital 
maintenance requirements as set out in the Companies Act.

d.  Revenue
Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Company and the 
revenue can be reliably measured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received, excluding discounts, 
rebates, and other sales taxes or duty. Revenue arising from the provision of services is recognised when and to the extent 
that the Company obtains the right to consideration in exchange for the performance of its contractual obligations.

27

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our Financials 
 
 
 
 
 
Our Financials

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements continued

2.  Basis of preparation and accounting policies continued
e.  Development costs
Development expenditure does not meet the strict criteria for capitalisation under IAS 38 and has been recognised as an 
expense.

Foreign currency

f. 
The financial statements of the Company are presented in the currency of the primary economic environment in which it 
operates (the functional currency) which is pounds sterling. In accordance with IAS 21, transactions entered into by the 
Company in a currency other than the functional currency are recorded at the rates ruling when the transactions occur. 
At each balance sheet date, monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing at 
the balance sheet date.

g.  Work in Progress
Work in progress is valued at cost, less the cost of work invoiced on incomplete contracts and less foreseeable losses. 
Cost comprises purchase cost plus production overheads.

h.  Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables arise principally through the provision by the Company of goods and services to customers 
(trade debtors). They also include other types of contractual monetary assets. These assets are initially recognised at fair 
value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost less any provision for impairment.

Loans and other receivables

i. 
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted 
in an active market. After initial measurement, loans and receivables are carried at amortised cost using the effective 
interest method less any allowance for impairment. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the loans and 
receivables are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.

The Company’s loans and receivables include cash and cash equivalents. These include cash in hand, and deposits held 
at call with banks.

Property and equipment

j. 
Property and equipment are stated at cost less any subsequent accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.

Where parts of an item of property and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items of 
property and equipment.

Leases in which the Company assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the leased asset are 
classified as finance leases. Leased assets acquired by way of finance lease are stated at an amount equal to the lower 
of their fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments at inception of the lease, less accumulated 
depreciation and impairment losses.

Depreciation is charged to the income statement within cost of sales and administrative expenses on a straight-line basis 
over the estimated useful lives of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment. The estimated useful lives are
as follows:

–  Leasehold improvements 

1 to 3 years

–  Fixtures, fittings and equipment 

1 to 3 years

–  Vehicles 

3 to 4 years

28

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

2.  Basis of preparation and accounting policies continued
Expenses incurred in respect of the maintenance and repair of property and equipment are charged against income 
when incurred. Refurbishment and improvement expenditure, where the benefit is expected to be long lasting, is 
capitalised as part of the appropriate asset.

The useful economic lives of property, plant and equipment and the carrying value of tangible fixed assets are assessed 
annually and any impairment is charged to the income statement.

Intangible assets

k. 
Expenditure on research activities is recognised in the income statement as an expense as incurred.

Other intangible assets that are acquired by the Company are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and 
impairment losses.

Amortisation of intangible assets is charged using the straight-line method to administrative expenses over the following period:

–  Patents 

20 years

Useful lives are based on the management’s estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue, which are 
periodically reviewed for continued appropriateness and any impairment is charged to the income statement.

l.  Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and call deposits with major banking institutions realisable within 
180 days.

m.  Other financial liabilities
The Company classifies its financial liabilities as:

Trade and other payables
These are initially recognised at invoiced value. These arise principally from the receipt of goods and services. There is 
no material difference between the invoiced value and the value calculated on an amortised cost basis or fair value.

Deferred income
This is the carrying value of income received from a customer in respect of the order for five systems which has not been 
fully recognised in the Income Statement pending delivery to the customer. The carrying value is fair value.

Leases

n. 
Finance leases
Finance leases, which transfer to the Company substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased 
item, are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the present value of 
the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease 
liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are reflected 
in profit or loss. Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the 
lease term, if there is no reasonable certainty that the Company will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term.

Operating leases
Operating lease rentals are charged to the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

29

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements continued

2.  Basis of preparation and accounting policies continued
o.  Financial assets
All of the Company’s financial assets are loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets 
with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets at fair 
value and comprise trade and other receivables and cash and cash equivalents.

p.  Share-based payment transactions
The Company awards share options and warrants to certain Directors and employees to acquire shares of the Company. The 
fair value of options and warrants granted is recognised as an employee expense with a corresponding increase in equity. 
The fair value is measured at grant date and spread over the period during which the Directors and employees become 
unconditionally entitled to the options or warrants. The fair value of the options and warrants granted is measured using a 
binomial option valuation model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options and warrants were 
granted. The amount recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options and warrants that 
vest only where vesting is dependent upon the satisfaction of service and non-market vesting conditions or where the vesting 
periods themselves are amended by the introduction of new schemes and the absorption of earlier schemes by agreement 
between the Company and the relevant Directors and employees. Where options or warrants granted are cancelled, all future 
charges arising in respect of the grant are charged to the income statement on the date of cancellation.

q.  Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation as a result of a past event and it is probable that 
the Group will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are measured at the present value of management’s best 
estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date and are discounted to 
present value where the effect is material.

Taxation

r. 
Tax on the profit or loss for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the income statement 
except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it is recognised in equity.

Current tax is the expected tax payable or recoverable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or 
substantively enacted at the balance sheet date together with any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.

Deferred tax assets are not recognised due to the uncertainty of their recovery.

3.  Significant accounting estimates and judgements
Carrying values of property and equipment
The Company monitors internal and external indicators of impairment relating to its property and equipment. 
Management has considered whether any indicators of impairment have arisen over certain assets relating to these 
assets. After assessing these, management has concluded that impairment has arisen in respect of assets with a gross 
book value of £238,798 during the year and subsequent to 31 October 2011. This has resulted in an impairment charge of 
£30,000 to the Statement of Comprehensive Income in the year to 31 October 2011.

Useful lives and impairment of intangible assets, and property and equipment
Intangible assets, and property and equipment are amortised or depreciated over their useful lives. Useful lives are based 
on the management’s estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue, which are periodically reviewed for 
continued appropriateness. After undertaking a comprehensive review of intangible assets, including the £299,182 
intangible assets acquired from Eneco Ltd in 2006 and the subsequent expenditure incurred in pursuing grant of acquired 
patent rights, management has concluded that certain of the specific intellectual property and patents acquired from Eneco 
are no longer core to the Company’s development and will not contribute significantly to revenue generation in the future. 
Accordingly, management has concluded that partial impairment has arisen with respect to intangible assets with a gross 
book value of £389,126 during the year and subsequent to 31 October 2011. This has resulted in an impairment charge of 
£191,379 to the Statement of Comprehensive Income in the year to 31 October 2011.

30

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

3.  Significant accounting estimates and judgements continued
Income taxes and withholding taxes
The Company believes that its receivables for tax recoverable are adequate for all open audit years based on its 
assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law. This assessment relies on estimates 
and assumptions and may involve a series of complex judgements about future events. To the extent that the final tax 
outcome of these matters is different from the amounts recorded, such differences will impact income tax expense in the 
period in which such determination is made.

Capitalisation of development expenditure
The Company uses the criteria of IAS 38 to determine whether development expenditure should be capitalised. After 
assessing these, management has concluded it would not be appropriate to capitalise development expenditure 
incurred during the year ended 31 October 2011.

Share-based payments
Certain employees (including Directors and senior Executives) of the Company receive remuneration in the form of 
share-based payment transactions, whereby employees render services as consideration for equity instruments 
(‘equity-settled transactions’).

The fair value is determined by an external valuer using an appropriate pricing model.

The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the 
period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant 
employees become fully entitled to the award (‘the vesting date’). The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled 
transactions at each reporting date until the vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and 
the Company’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. The profit or loss charge or 
credit for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of 
that period.

No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional 
upon a market condition, which are treated as vesting irrespective of whether or not the market condition is satisfied, 
provided that all other performance and/or service conditions are satisfied. Where the terms of an equity-settled award 
are modified, the minimum expense recognised is the expense as if the terms had not been modified. An additional 
expense is recognised for any modification which increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement, 
or is otherwise beneficial to the employee as measured at the date of modification. Where an equity-settled award 
is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the 
award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award, and designated as a 
replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new awards are treated as if they were a modification 
of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.

4.  Segmental analysis
A segment is a distinguishable component of the Company that is engaged in providing products or services in a 
particular business sector (business segment) or in providing products or services in a particular economic environment 
(geographic segment), which is subject to risks and rewards that are different in those other segments. The Company 
operated in the year in one business segment, the development of fuel cells, and in three principal geographic 
segments, the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. All revenue was derived from one customer in each of Germany 
(£27,498)and Australia (£7,970). All of the gross profit was from Australia. All assets and liabilities were in the UK at the 
year end.

31

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements continued

5.  Operating loss

This has been stated after charging:
Depreciation/Impairment of property and equipment
Research and Development expenditure
Amortisation/Impairment of intangible assets
Equity-settled share-based payment expense
Auditor’s remuneration – audit
Auditor’s remuneration – tax
Auditor’s remuneration – other services

6.  Staff numbers and costs, including Directors
The average numbers of employees in the year were:

Support, operations and technical
Administration

The aggregate payroll costs for these persons were:

Wages and salaries (including Directors’ emoluments)
Social security
Equity-settled share-based payment expense

7.  Directors’ remuneration

Wages and salaries
Social security
Equity-settled share-based payment expense
Other compensation (see note 24)

The emoluments of the Chairman

The emoluments of the highest-paid Director

Year ended
31 October
2011
£

386,189
1,429,164
212,448
690,472
16,000
1,000
3,050

Year ended
31 October
2010 
£
267,956
1,053,371
18,982
527,705
17,500
2,500
1,550

Year ended
31 October
2011
Number

26
5

31

£

Year ended
31 October
2010 
Number
20
5

25

£

1,121,323
129,553
536,854

1,067,526
116,718
345,811

1,787,730

1,530,055

Year ended
31 October
2011
£

323,333
35,745
425,818
152,685

937,581

Year ended
31 October
2010 
£
312,262
31,800
447,199
69,322

860,583

104,290

111,927

309,110

269,047

The remuneration, details of share options and interests in the Company’s shares of each Director are shown in the 
Directors’ Report on pages 12 to 17.

32

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

8.  Financial income

Bank interest receivable
Loan interest receivable

Total interest receivable

Year ended
31 October
2011
£

43,425
1,505

44,930

Year ended
31 October
2010 
£
28,986
1,475

30,461

9a.  Investment in Associate
The Company acquired 25% of the share capital of Waste2Tricity Ltd (W2T) (a company registered in England & Wales) 
on 17 June 2009 for £2,500 by converting £2,500 of the £150,000 loan provided to W2T under an agreement of February 
2009. The loan accrues interest at 0.5% above base rate. The loan is shown in Current Assets – Trade and Other 
Receivables.

The Company’s share of the results of its associate was as follows:

Revenue
Profit/(loss)
Assets
Liabilities

9b.  Loan to Associate

Loan to W2T at 1 November, including accrued interest
Loan interest receivable

Loan at 31 October

Year ended
31 October
2011
£

–
(5,951)
3,932
76,113

Year ended
31 October
2010 
£
–
(17,781)
1,771
30,876

Year ended
31 October
2011
£

150,475
1,505

151,980

Year ended
31 October
2010 
£
149,000
1,475

150,475

33

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements continued

10.  Taxation

Recognised in the income statement
Research and development tax credit – current year
Research and development tax credit – prior year adjustment

Total tax credit

Reconciliation of effective tax rates

Loss before tax

Tax using the domestic rate of corporation tax of 26.7% (2010: 28%)

Effect of:
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
Research and development allowance
Research and development tax credit
Depreciation in excess of capital allowances
Losses surrendered for research and development
Other adjustments
Unutilised losses carried forward

Total tax credit for the year

Year ended
31 October
2011
£

354,822
–

354,822

Year ended
31 October
2010 
£
258,076
(7,718)

250,358

(4,345,262)

(3,039,088)

1,160,185

850,945

186,110
(348,630)
354,822
72,090
730,217
–
520,398

354,822

156,239
(221,208)
258,076
9,410
516,152
–
390,352

250,358

11.  Loss per share
The calculation of the basic loss per share is based upon the net loss after tax attributable to ordinary Shareholders of 
£3,990,440 (2010: loss of £2,770,949) and a weighted average number of shares in issue for the year.

Basic loss per share (pence)
Diluted loss per share (pence)
Loss attributable to equity Shareholders

Weighted average number of shares in issue

Year ended
31 October
2011

(2.26)p
(2.26)p
(3,990,440)

Year ended
31 October
2010 
(1.87)p
(1.87)p
(2,770,949)

Number

Number

176,599,336 148,396,520

Diluted earnings per share
The diluted loss per share is the same as the basic loss per share, as the loss for the year has an anti-dilutive effect.

34

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

12.  Intangible assets

Cost
Balance at 1 November
Additions

Balance at 31 October

Amortisation
Balance at 1 November
Charge for the year
Impairment

Balance at 31 October

Net book value

For details of impairment charge, see note 3.

13.  Property and equipment

Cost
At 31 October 2009
Additions
Reclassification
Disposals

At 31 October 2010
Additions

At 31 October 2011

Depreciation
At 31 October 2009
Charge for the year
Reclassification
Disposals

At 31 October 2010
Charge for the year
Impairment

At 31 October 2011

Net Book Value
At 31 October 2011
At 31 October 2010

2011
Patents
£

397,712
43,094

440,806

78,860
21,069
191,379

291,308

149,498

2010
Patents 
£

368,403
29,308

397,712

59,878
18,982
–

78,860

318,852

Leasehold
improvements
£

Fixtures,
fittings and
equipment
£

Total
£

150,152
19,820
14,037
–

184,009
32,188

216,197

143,258
3,140
10,672
–

157,070
21,268
–

178,337

706,379
610,723
(14,037)
(48,788)

856,531
630,543
–
(48,788)

1,254,278
545,608

1,438,286
577,796

1,799,886

2,016,083

443,204
262,051
(10,672)
(46,023)

648,560
334,921
30,000

586,462
265,191
–
(46,023)

805,630
356,189
30,000

1,013,481

1,191,819

37,860
26,939

786,404
605,718

824,264
632,657

For details of impairment charge, see note 3. There are no assets held under finance leases.

35

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements continued

14.  Trade and other receivables

Trade receivables
Corporation Tax receivable
Other receivables

2011
£

—
354,822
306,121

734,684

2010 
£
391
250,358
260,016

569,924

There were no trade and other receivables that were past due or considered to be impaired. The trade and other 
receivables balances are categorised as loans and other receivables. There is no significant difference between the 
fair value of the trade and other receivables and the values stated above.

15.  Cash and cash equivalents

Cash at bank
Bank deposits

2011
£

738,821
5,229,608

2010 
£
–
5,345,716

5,968,429

5,345,716

Cash at bank and bank deposits consist of cash. There is no material foreign exchange movement in respect of cash and 
cash equivalents.

16.  Issued share capital

At 31 October 2009
Issue of shares on 10 December 20091
Issue of shares on 2 February 20102
Issue of shares on 22 February 20102
Issue of shares on 1 March 20102
Issue of shares on 25 October 20103
At 31 October 2010
Issue of shares on 4 July 20114
At 31 October 2011

Ordinary
shares
£
127,683
21,500
840
450
400
22,466
173,339
10,000
183,339

Number
127,682,854
21,500,000
840,000
450,000
400,000
22,466,353
173,339,207
9,999,555
183,338,762

Total
£

Share
premium
£
8,940,380
1,992,494
83,160
44,550
39,600
3,944,032

9,068,063
2,013,994
84,000
45,000
40,000
3,966,499
15,044,217 15,217,556
3,932,572
18,966,789 19,150,128

3,922,572

1 

 21,500,000 ordinary shares with a par value of 0.1p per share were issued at 10p per ordinary share by way of a placing to UK investors. Gross 

proceeds from the issue amounted to £2,150,000.

2 

3 

 1,690,000 options and warrants were exercised between 2 February and 1 March 2010 at an exercise price of 10p per ordinary share.

 16,763,650 ordinary shares with a par value of 0.1p per share were issued at 17.72p per ordinary share by way of a placing to Linc Energy and a further 

5,702,703 ordinary shares with a par value of 0.1p per share were issued at 18.5p per ordinary share by way of a placing to a group of investors.

4 

 9,999,555 ordinary shares with a par value of 0.1p per share were issued at 40.00p per ordinary share by way of a placing to Linc Energy and to a 

group of investors.

36

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

16.  Issued share capital continued
The total authorised number of Ordinary shares is 700,000,000 shares (2010: 700,000,000 shares) with a par value of 
0.1p per share (2010: 0.1p per share). All issued shares are fully paid.

The Company considers its capital and reserves attributable to equity Shareholders to be the Company’s capital. In 
managing its capital, the Company’s primary long-term objective is to provide a return for its equity Shareholders 
through capital growth. Going forward the Company will seek to maintain a gearing ratio that balances risks and returns 
at an acceptable level and also to maintain a sufficient funding base to enable the Company to meet its working capital 
needs. The Company’s activities are at a pre-revenue stage and management considers that no useful target debt to 
equity gearing ratio can be identified at this time.

Details of the Company’s capital are disclosed in the Company statement of changes in equity.

There have been no other significant changes to the Company’s management objectives, policies and processes in the 
year nor has there been any change in what the Company considers to be capital.

17a. Share options

At 31 October 2009
Options granted in the year
Options exercised in the year
Options lapsed in the year
At 31 October 2010
Options lapsed in the year

At 31 October 2011

17b. Warrants

At 31 October 2009
Warrants granted in the year
Warrants exercised in the year
Warrants lapsed in the year
At 31 October 2010

At 31 October 2011

Number
of options
10,144,990
5,100,000
(840,000)
(3,204,990)
11,200,000
(370,000)

10,830,000

Exercise
price
3.13–23p
17.5–24p
10p
3.13–23p
3.13–24p
17.5–24p

3.13–24p

Number
of warrants
8,789,980
7,206,000
(850,000)
(3,189,980)
11,956,000

11,956,000

Exercise
price
3.13–22p
24–30p
10p
10–22.3p
3.13–30p

3.13–30p

Weighted
 average
remaining
contractual
life

6.62 yrs

5.69 yrs

Weighted
 average
remaining
contractual
life

8.87 yrs

7.87 yrs

37

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements continued

17c. Equity-settled share-based payments charge
Share options

Option
price
(p)
10
22
23
23
3.13
17.5
24
20.80

Average
grant date
share price
(p)
9
20
21
14
3.13
18.75
23.75
20

Average
expected
volatility
(p.a.)
46%
46%
46%
46%
113.8%
188%
188%
188%

Average
risk-free
interest rate
(p.a.)
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%

Average
dividend
yield
(p.a.)
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%

Average
implied
option life
(years)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.0

Average
fair value
per option
(p)
2.5
6
6
2
2
14.07
17.80
15

Adjustment for changes in assumptions – vesting
Adjustments – prior year
Adjustments for expected leavers on current options – 10%

Total charge for the year (2010: £50,267)

Warrants

Warrant
price
(p)
10
22
3.13
24
30

Average
grant date
share price
(p)
20
20
3.13
23.75
23.75

Average
expected
volatility
(p.a.)
46%
46%
113.8%
188%
188%

Average
risk-free
interest rate
(p.a.)
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%

Average
dividend
yield
(p.a.)
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%

Average
implied
option life
(years)
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.5
3.5

Average
fair value
per option
(p)
10
6
2
17.8
17.64

Adjustment for performance conditions (non-market)
Adjustment for changes in assumptions – vesting
Adjustments for expected leavers on current warrants – 0%

Total charge for the year (2010: £477,439)

Total equity-settled share-based payment charge (2010: £527,705)

Amount
expensed
in the
2011
accounts
£
–
–
–
–
23,443
99,474
26,377
155,641

(24,433)
–
(26,461)

254,041

Amount
expensed
in the
2011
accounts
£
–
–
–
421,315
5,874

–
9,242
–

436,430

690,472

Expected volatility has been based on the historical volatility of share price returns over one year to the date of grant of the 
options and warrants. Vesting requirements are one year and three years for the exercise of warrants and options respectively.

The fair value of services received in return for share options and other share-based incentives granted is measured by 
reference to the fair value of share options and incentives granted. This estimate is based on a Black–Scholes model, 
adjusted for non-vesting market-related conditions, which is considered most appropriate considering the effects of the 
vesting conditions, expected exercise period and the dividend policy of the Company.

38

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

18.  Trade and other payables

Trade payables
Deferred income
Other payables
Accruals

19.  Operating lease commitments

Non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
Within one year
Between one and five years

Greater than five years

2011
£

322,241
96,242
36,075
71,550

526,109

2011
£

89,081
90,672

—

2010 
£
139,743
123,740
35,064
77,937

376,484

2010 
£

75,253
120,247

—

179,753

195,500

The lease commitments relate to accommodation and three vehicles.

20.  Financial instruments
In common with other businesses, the Company is exposed to risks that arise from its use of financial instruments. This note 
describes the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing those risks and the methods used to measure 
them. Further quantitative information in respect of these risks is presented throughout these financial statements. The 
significant accounting policies regarding financial instruments are disclosed in note 2 and the significant accounting 
estimates and judgements are set out in note 3.

Principal financial instruments
The principal financial instruments used by the Company, from which financial instrument risk arises, are as follows:

Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other payables

2011
£

734,684
5,968,429
526,109

2010 
£
569,924
5,345,716
376,484

General objectives, policies and processes
The Board has overall responsibility for the determination of the Company’s risk management objectives and policies 
and, while retaining ultimate responsibility for them, it has delegated part of the authority for designing and operating 
processes that ensure the effective implementation of the objectives and policies to the Company’s finance team. The 
Board receives reports from financial team through which it reviews the effectiveness of the processes put in place and 
the appropriateness of the objectives and policies it sets.

The overall objective of the Board is to set policies that seek to reduce ongoing risk as far as possible without unduly 
affecting the Company’s competitiveness and flexibility. Further details regarding these policies are set out overleaf.

39

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements continued

20.  Financial instruments continued
Credit risk
Credit risk arises principally from the Company’s trade and other receivables and cash and cash equivalents. It is the risk 
that the counterparty fails to discharge its obligation in respect of the instrument. The maximum exposure to credit risk 
equals the carrying value of these items in the financial statements as shown below:

Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents

2011
£

734,684
5,968,429

2010 
£
569,924
5,345,716

The Company’s principal trade and other receivables arose from: a) work in progress on the contract with AkzoNobel 
for which the Company has already received payment (held as a payment in advance pending completion of the work), 
b) a loan to W2T; and c) an R&D tax credit. The recoverability of the W2T amount shown is expected without material 
adjustment during the first half of 2011/12. Credit risk with cash and cash equivalents is reduced by placing funds with 
banks with acceptable credit ratings and government support where applicable.

Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk arises from the Company’s management of working capital and the amount of funding required for the 
development programme. It is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting its financial obligations as 
they fall due. The Company’s policy is to ensure that it will always have sufficient cash to allow it to meet its liabilities 
when they become due. The Company raised £3.95 million net of costs in July 2011 to provide additional financial 
resources.

The principal liabilities of the Company are trade and other payables in respect of the ongoing product development 
programme. Trade and other payables are all payable within two months with the exception of the payment in advance 
noted above. The Board receives cash flow projections on a regular basis as well as information on cash balances.

Interest rate risk
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk in respect of surplus funds held on deposit.

Fair value of financial liabilities

Trade and other payables

2011
£

526,109

2010 
£
376,484

There is no difference between the fair value and book value of trade and other payables.

Currency risk
The Company does not currently enter into forward exchange contracts or otherwise hedge its potential foreign 
exchange exposure. The Board considers that this exposure is not material pending commercialisation of the Company’s 
products. The Board monitors and reviews its policies in respect of currency risk on a regular basis. At 31 October 2011 
the Company held no monetary assets or liabilities in currencies other than the functional currency of the operating units 
involved (2010: nil).

40

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 
Our Business
01 Who we are

02

Chairman’s Statement

06 Operating and Financial Review

12

18

Directors’ Report

Directors, Company Secretary and Advisors

Our Financials
20

Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

21

22

23

24

Independent Auditor’s Report

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Position

Statement of Changes in Equity

25

26

Cash Flow Statement

Notes forming part of the Financial Statements

21.  Capital commitments
The Company had capital commitments of £30,014 for testing equipment outstanding at 31 October 2011 
(2010: £158,115).

22.  Board changes and post-balance sheet events
Ian Williamson was appointed as Chief Executive Officer on 7 November 2011.

23.  Ultimate controlling party
There is no ultimate controlling party.

24.  Related party transactions
During the year ended 31 October 2011:

£69,618 (plus VAT) was invoiced by Hudson Raine Ltd (a company registered in England & Wales) for the services of 
David Marson as a Director and Company Secretary of AFC Energy plc (2010: £52,006). Mr Marson is also a Director and 
Shareholder of Hudson Raine Ltd. At 31 October 2011, the sum owing to Hudson Raine Ltd was nil (2010: nil).

£31,417 (plus VAT) was invoiced by Cornerstone Capital Ltd (a company registered in England & Wales) for the services of 
Simon Hunt as a Director of AFC Energy plc (2010: £13,083). Mr Hunt is also a Director and Shareholder of Cornerstone 
Capital Ltd. At 31 October 2010, the sum owing to Cornerstone Capital Ltd was nil (2010: nil).

£139,000 (plus VAT) was invoiced by Cranwood Management Ltd (a company registered in England & Wales) for 
consultancy services. The company is owned by Adam White. Members of Mr White’s family are nominated beneficiaries 
of the Age of Reason Foundation, which is a major Shareholder in the Company. At 31 October 2011, the sum owing to 
Cranwood Ltd was nil (2010: nil).

£15,319 (plus VAT) was invoiced by Richards and Appleby Ltd (a company registered in England & Wales) for the services 
of Mitchell Field as a Director of AFC Energy plc (2010: nil). Mr Field is also a Director and Shareholder of Richards and 
Appleby Ltd. At 31 October 2011, the sum owing to Richards and Appleby Ltd was nil (2010: nil). 

£1,667 was invoiced by Linc Energy Ltd (a company registered in Australia) for the services of David Smith as a Director of 
AFC Energy plc (2010: nil). Linc Energy Ltd is a major shareholder in the Company. At 31 October 2011 the amount owing 
to Linc Energy Ltd was £1,667 (2010: nil).

£103,453 (plus VAT) was incoiced by Parilis Ltd (a company registered in England & Wales) for consultancy services and 
latterly, for the services of Ed Wilson as a Director of AFC Energy plc (2010: nil). Mr Wilson is also a Director and 
Shareholder of Parilis Ltd. At 31 October 2011, the sum owing to Parilis was nil (2010: nil)

£1,505 loan interest was receivable from Waste2Tricity (a company registered in England & Wales). The sum owing to 
Waste2Tricity at 31 October 2011 was nil (2010: nil). During the year ended 31 October 2009, AFC Energy plc provided 
Waste2Tricity with an interest bearing loan of £150,000 under the terms of an agreement to supply AFC fuel cells to 
Waste2Tricity for integration into its system for the conversion of municipal solid waste. The Company subsequently 
converted £2,500 of the loan to equity for a 25% share of Waste2Tricity (see note 9). The Shareholders in Waste2Tricity 
include Adam White, Eturab Corporation and Ian Balchin. Members of the White family are nominated beneficiaries of 
the Age of Reason Foundation. Both the Age of Reason Foundation and Eturab Corporation are substantial 
Shareholders in AFC Energy. Ian Balchin’s shareholding in Waste2Tricity was granted in lieu of payment for work done for 
Waste2Tricity before he was employed by AFC Energy. 

41

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

Shareholder Notes

42

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com43

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4Our FinancialsOur Financials

44

21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 October 2011afcenergy.com 21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4AFC Energy plc
Unit 71.4 Dunsfold Park
Stovolds Hill
Cranleigh
Surrey
GU6 8TB

Tel: 01483 276726

Fax: 01483 266839

info@afcenergy.com
www.afcenergy.com

www.afcenergy.com

 21208-04  03/03/2012 Proof 4