2015 Annual Report
SM
47376.indd 1
4/1/16 9:11 AM
Air Transport Services Group 2015 Annual Report
To Our Shareholders
2015 included a number of major achievements for
your company, including fi nancial results that were among
the best we have ever recorded, and some of the best
new-business developments in our history.
Our fi nancial results show that we are back in a growth
mode, at a time when much of the air cargo industry has
been fl at. Th at’s a testament to our strong commitment to
midsize cargo aircraft, especially the medium wide-body
Boeing 767 freighter now regarded the world over as the
premier freighter for regional express and e-commerce
networks. Our diff erentiated business model, focused on
the 767, adds signifi cant advantages. It includes leasing,
ACMI operating capability, maintenance, and ancillary
services we can leverage to deliver solutions that are
diffi cult to match in today’s marketplace.
We had forty-seven 767 freighters in service at the end
of 2015, more than any other provider off ering them on a
dedicated basis. We are adding more of them this year and
next to meet growing demand from customers who
recognize the model’s effi ciency and fl exibility.
We added $30 million in revenues last year versus 2014,
for a total of $619 million. We delivered strong net
earnings from continuing operations of $39 million, or
$0.60 per share, and set a record with operating cash fl ow
of $174 million. Th e key to those fi nancial results was
more freighter aircraft in service, including thirty of our
767 freighters under multi-year dry-lease arrangements by
year-end. We also kept the aircraft we operate—forty-one
at peak last year—in the air and serving our customers.
Cargo Aircraft Management, our leasing business, was
again the principal driver of our strong earnings progress
in 2015, and is poised for improved results in 2016.
CAM deployed six more 767 freighters in 2015 to
external lease customers. We expect double-digit growth
in its dry lease portfolio over the next two years, based on
demand from customers in the U.S., Europe and Asia.
Our ACMI Services segment sharply improved its
performance in 2015. Our airlines, ABX Air and Air
Transport International, delivered exceptional service to
both new and continuing customers during the peak
holiday season. We expect both to add to their operating
fl eets as the year progresses.
We invested $159 million in our business last year,
including the purchase and modifi cation of four 767-300
aircraft. All four were acquired with dry-lease customers
ready to take them when ready, and three have eight-year
lease commitments.
Th e year also included several strategic
accomplishments that will generate strong cash fl ow
streams across all of our businesses for years to come.
2015 began with a four-year extension of our
relationship with DHL, our largest customer, for whom
we remain the principal provider of U.S. air network
support. Th e extensions to our agreements to lease and
operate aircraft on DHL’s behalf took eff ect in April 2015
and had the eff ect of doubling the number of contracted
months for our dry-leased 767s in DHL’s network, and
47376.indd 2
4/1/16 9:11 AM
Air Transport Services Group 2015 Annual Report
included continued operating support from ABX Air
for fi fteen aircraft. Our DHL-leased fl eet has grown
signifi cantly since April 2015, and now includes fi ve
767-300 freighters.
We also signed a new multi-year heavy maintenance
agreement with Delta Air Lines for its fl eet of more than
eighty Boeing 717 passenger aircraft. Th at agreement,
which began last October, validates both the 2014
expansion of our hangar capacity in Wilmington and our
decades of experience servicing similar DC-9 airframes.
We have expanded our customer relationships abroad.
We deployed one 767 with Raya Airways in Asia and
another with a carrier in Europe. We also added dry
leases with Sweden’s West Atlantic, where we are a
signifi cant investor. Th ree of our 767s now operate in
West Atlantic’s European regional fl eet.
Our expanded global footprint included a pathway into
the China market through a joint venture. We have
partnered there with a regional airline, Okay Airways, the
e-commerce retailer Vipshop, and other investors in
China to establish a regional air cargo airline that will be
based in Tianjin, a major port and industrial center in the
northeast. We expect the venture to launch intra-China
cargo service in the second half of this year, initially with
Boeing 737 cargo aircraft. We anticipate that as it
grows, it will add 767 freighters, leveraging our expertise
and resources.
our 767-200 freighters with signifi cant logistics support
during the holiday season, and continues currently.
After proving the concept, we executed agreements in
March 2016 with Amazon for the lease and airline
operation of twenty 767s, to operate within a North
American network. Th e aircraft will include twelve of our
current 767-200s, plus eight more 767-300s that we will
acquire, convert to freighter confi guration, and deploy
through mid-year 2017. Th e fi ve-year operating
agreement covers our fl ight crews, maintenance and
insurance on the aircraft, plus logistical services in
multiple sites.
We know that our available 767s, and our access to
more, are compelling reasons to work with us in
developing a major air network. But we also regard our
supplemental services, including maintenance, freight
handling, and network management as equally important
elements of our solution set. Th e decades of experience
our employees have operating effi ciently within an air
express network doesn’t show up on our balance sheet, but
it is an attribute that is not lost on any of our customers
who want to utilize our aircraft and operating capabilities
in that environment.
Th e Amazon agreements include an equity component
that demonstrates Amazon’s confi dence in our business,
and their commitment to the air network they intend to
develop with our support.
Perhaps our most exciting development in 2015 was the
initiation of dedicated U.S. cargo service for Amazon. Th e
trial air operation we launched last September—less than a
month after concept approval—quickly expanded to fi ve of
We have started to issue warrants to Amazon towards
the purchase of up to 19.9 percent of ATSG’s common
shares, with vesting periods over the next fi ve years. Th is
component of our long-term relationship with Amazon
47376.indd 3
4/1/16 9:11 AM
Air Transport Services Group 2015 Annual Report
will require your vote in favor of a proposal on our 2016
proxy ballot to increase the number of shares we can issue.
Th is increase is essential to accommodate the warrants,
and for other corporate purposes. We have provided more
information about it in the proxy materials we are
providing for our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders.
In 2016, we expect to place six more 767s in service
while investing about $290 million overall, with most of
that spending allocated to the 767-300s we will deliver
to Amazon this year and next. Th ese investments are
well within the scope of our current cash fl ow outlook
and credit availability, thanks to our conservative
debt leverage.
We expect our fl eet investments, and new lease
agreements for current 767s, to increase our externally
leased 767 aircraft portfolio by fourteen this year to
forty-four, representing more than 80 percent of our
fi fty-three operating 767s at the end of 2016. Our airlines
could separately be contracted to operate as many as
thirty-one of those externally leased 767s.
Even as fl eet investments continue, we will continue to
create value through an array of capital allocation options,
including the share repurchase program we launched last
year. We spent $10.3 million to acquire 1.1 million of our
shares in 2015, and we are setting an increased pace of
repurchases thus far in 2016. We expect that our
conservative balance sheet, and the predictable cash fl ow
associated with long-term customer contracts, will
support a volume of share repurchases that signifi cantly
mitigates the dilutive eff ect of increasing the share count
to accommodate Amazon’s future exercise of warrants.
Th e Amazon relationship is important to us, and
represents major progress toward diversifying our revenue
base. We also expect some synergies to develop through
our coverage of two major U.S. air networks. As we ramp
up support for Amazon, however, we will make sure to
maintain excellent service to DHL, the U.S. Military, and
all of our other customers.
2015 was a very good year, and 2016 is shaping up to
be an even better one. Our converted 767 freighters are in
high demand, and we intend to acquire and deploy more
of them. Our more than 2,200 dedicated team members
in Ohio and around the world are already applying their
experience and skill sets to help customers achieve their
business goals. As we execute the plans we have prepared,
we appreciate your continued support, and hope to share
more good news about our progress as the year unfolds.
Joseph C. Hete
President & Chief Executive Officer
Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
47376.indd 4
4/1/16 9:11 AM
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
Commission file number 000-50368
________________________________________________________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
________________________________________________________________
Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
26-1631624
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
145 Hunter Drive, Wilmington, OH 45177
(Address of principal executive offices)
937-382-5591
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
________________________________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, Par Value $.01 per share
(Title of class)
Name of each exchange on which registered: NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES
NO
NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES
NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES
NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES
NO
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at
which the common equity was last sold, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter:
$551,045,344. As of March 14, 2016, 63,888,980 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held May 12, 2016 are incorporated by reference
into Part III.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations,” in Item 7, that are not historical facts are considered forward-looking statements (as that term is defined in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Words such as “projects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “will,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expects,”
“intends” and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based
on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date of this filing, and involve risks and uncertainties that are inherently difficult to predict.
Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements for any number of reasons, including those
described in “Risk Factors” starting on page 11 and in “Results of Operations” starting on page 24.
AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
2015 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART I
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Equity Securities
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
PART III
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
SIGNATURES
PART IV
Page
1
11
18
18
19
19
20
22
23
39
40
72
72
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
81
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General Development of Business
Air Transport Services Group, Inc. provides aircraft leasing, airline operations, aircraft maintenance and other
support services to the air cargo transportation and package delivery industries. We offer a range of complementary
services to delivery companies, freight forwarders, airlines and government customers. We provide standalone services
as well as customized, bundled solutions. (When the context requires, we may use the terms “Company” and “ATSG”
in this report to refer to the business of ATSG and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.) Our services are summarized
below.
Aircraft leasing: We lease cargo aircraft through ATSG's leasing subsidiary, Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc.
(“CAM”). CAM services global demand for medium range and medium capacity airlift by offering Boeing 767, 757
and 737 aircraft leases. CAM is able to provide competitive lease rates by converting passenger aircraft into cargo
freighters. CAM monitors the medium passenger aircraft sale markets and acquires passenger aircraft based on projected
into-service costs and rate of return targets, then manages the modification of passenger aircraft into freighters. As a
result, the converted freighters can be deployed into regional markets more economically than larger capacity aircraft,
newly built freighters or other competing alternatives. CAM's aircraft leases are typically under multi-year agreements.
ACMI services: ATSG wholly owns two airlines, ABX Air, Inc. (“ABX”) and Air Transport International, Inc.
(“ATI”), each independently certificated by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Company's airlines contract
directly with customers to supply a combination of aircraft, crews, maintenance and insurance services, commonly
referred to as ACMI services. ABX operates Boeing 767 freighter aircraft, while ATI operates Boeing 767 and Boeing
757 freighter and 757 "combi" aircraft. Combi aircraft are capable of carrying passengers and cargo containers on the
main flight deck. The airlines can conduct cargo operations worldwide.
Support services: Customers who lease our aircraft typically need related services, such as scheduled aircraft
maintenance, aircraft line maintenance, crew training and other transportation related solutions which our subsidiaries
can provide. The support services we provide to delivery companies, freight forwarders and other airlines provide us
with a competitive advantage for diversification and incremental revenues. Our businesses and subsidiaries providing
support services are summarized below.
• ABX provides flight crew training, flight simulator rental and aircraft line maintenance services;
• Airborne Maintenance and Engineering Services, Inc. (“AMES”) is an aircraft maintenance, repair and
overhaul business. AMES also provides aircraft line maintenance;
• AMES Material Services, Inc. ("AMS") resells and brokers aircraft parts;
• LGSTX Services, Inc. (“LGSTX”) provides material handling and ground equipment maintenance and ground
equipment rentals for aircraft support;
• LGSTX Distribution Services, Inc. ("LDS") operates mail and package sorting centers.
Our business development and marketing activities are led by the Company's Airborne Global Solutions, Inc.
("AGS") subsidiary. AGS assists our businesses in achieving their sales and marketing plans by identifying customers'
business and operational requirements and by providing sales leads to our subsidiaries. AGS develops bundled, turn-
key cargo airline solutions that leverage the entire portfolio of the Company's subsidiaries' capabilities to provide
flexible, customized services based on our experience in global cargo operations.
The Company is incorporated in Delaware and its headquarters is in Wilmington, Ohio. ATSG's common shares
are publicly traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol ATSG. ATSG was formed on December 31, 2007,
for the purpose of creating a holding company structure from the reorganization of ABX which was incorporated in
1980. Between 1980 and August 2003, ABX was an affiliate of Airborne, Inc. (“Airborne”), a former publicly traded,
integrated delivery service provider. On August 15, 2003, ABX was separated from Airborne and became an independent
publicly traded company, in conjunction with the acquisition of Airborne by an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
DHL Worldwide Express, B.V. In 2004, we established LDS to provide mail sorting services to the United States Postal
Service, ("USPS"). The Company acquired CAM, ATI and Capital Cargo International Airlines, Inc. ("CCIA") on
December 31, 2007. ATI began operations in 1979 and was an affiliate of BAX Global, Inc. (“BAX/Schenker”) prior
to 2006. In 2009, the aircraft maintenance operations of ABX, including a hangar facility in Wilmington, were spun-
1
out into AMES, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Similarly, in 2010, the material handling and aviation
ground support operations of ABX were spun-out into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, now known as
LGSTX. During 2013, we merged CCIA into ATI, with ATI as the surviving entity.
In January 2014, the Company acquired a 25 percent equity interest in West Atlantic AB of Gothenburg, Sweden.
West Atlantic AB, through its two airlines, Atlantic Airlines Ltd. and West Air Sweden AB, operates a fleet of
approximately 45 aircraft. West Atlantic AB operates its aircraft on behalf of European regional mail carriers and
express logistics providers. The airlines operate a combined fleet of British Aerospace ATPs, Bombardier CRJ-200-
PFs, and Boeing 767 and 737 aircraft.
In September 2015, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement to establish an express cargo airline serving
multiple destinations within the Peoples Republic of China (including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) and surrounding
countries. The airline will be based in in Tianjin, China with registered capital of 400 million RMB (US$63 million).
It will be established pending the receipt of required governmental approvals and plans to commence flight operations
in the second half of 2016. We expect to contribute approximately $16 million to the joint venture over the next six
months. We plan to offer the new airline aircraft leases to build its fleet.
In September, 2015, we began to operate a trial air network for Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. (“AFS”), a
subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”). The network grew to five dedicated Boeing 767 freighter aircraft during
2015 and includes services for cargo handling and logistical support. On March 8, 2016, the Company entered into an
Air Transportation Services Agreement (the “ATSA”) with AFS pursuant to which CAM will lease 20 Boeing 767
freighter aircraft to AFS, including 12 Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft for a term of five years and eight Boeing
767-300 freighter aircraft for a term of seven years. The ATSA, which has a term of five years, also provides for the
operation of those aircraft by the Company’s airline subsidiaries, and the performance of hub and gateway services by
LGSTX. CAM owns all of the Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft and either owns or has entered into commitments to
purchase all of the Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft that will be leased and operated under the ATSA. The ATSA
becomes effective April 1, 2016.
In conjunction with the execution of the ATSA, the Company and Amazon entered into an Investment Agreement
and a Stockholders Agreement. The Investment Agreement calls for the Company to issue warrants in three tranches,
which will grant Amazon the right to acquire up to 19.9% of the Company’s outstanding common shares measured as
further described below. The exercise price of the warrants will be $9.73 per share, which represents the closing price
of ATSG’s common shares on February 9, 2016. The first tranche of warrants, issued upon execution of the Investment
Agreement, grants Amazon a right to purchase approximately 12.81 million ATSG common shares, with the right to
purchase 7.69 million common shares vesting upon issuance and the right to purchase the remaining 5.12 million
common shares vesting as ATSG delivers additional aircraft leased under the ATSA or as the Company achieves specified
revenue targets in connection with the ATSA. The first tranche of warrants cannot be exercised prior to the earlier of
the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ATSG and July 8, 2016. The second tranche of warrants, which
will grant Amazon a right to purchase approximately 1.59 million ATSG common shares, will be issued on the second
anniversary of the date of the Investment Agreement and will vest immediately upon issuance. The third tranche of
warrants will be issued upon the date that is four years and six months after the date of the Investment Agreement, and
will also vest immediately upon issuance. The third tranche of warrants will grant Amazon the right to purchase such
additional number of ATSG common shares as is necessary to bring Amazon’s ownership to 19.9% of the Company’s
pre-transaction outstanding common shares measured on a GAAP-diluted basis, adjusted for share issuances and
repurchases by the Company following the date of the Investment Agreement, after giving effect to the issuance of the
warrants. Each of the three tranches of warrants will be exercisable in accordance with its terms through the fifth
anniversary of the date of the Investment Agreement. We anticipate making the common shares underlying the warrants
available through a combination of share repurchases and the issuance of additional shares. The Company’s stockholders
will be asked to approve an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company at the next annual meeting
of stockholders to increase the number of authorized common shares and to approve the exercise in full of the warrants
as required under the rules of the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Financial Information
The Company has two reportable segments, “ACMI Services" and "CAM." Due to the similarities among the
Company's airline operations, they are aggregated into the ACMI Services segment. Our other business operations,
including aircraft maintenance, engineering and modification services; aircraft part sales; equipment leasing and
2
maintenance; and mail and package handling do not constitute reportable segments due to their size. Customer revenues
for 2015 are summarized below. Additional financial information about our segments and geographical revenues is
presented in Note N to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
External revenues (in
thousands)
Subsidiaries and
businesses
CAM
$93,395
CAM
ACMI
Services
Support
services
$431,989
ABX, ATI
$93,880
ABX, AMES,
AMS, GFS,
LDS, LGSTX
DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. and its affiliates (individually and collectively, "DHL"), is the Company's
largest customer. The Company has had long-term contracts with DHL since August 2003. Business with DHL totaled
46% of the Company's consolidated revenues in 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the Company, through CAM leased
17 Boeing 767 aircraft to DHL; 15 of those were being operated by the Company's airlines for DHL. Additionally, the
airlines operated seven CAM-owned Boeing aircraft and one DHL leased aircraft under other operating arrangements
with DHL. The U.S. Military comprised 16% of the Company's consolidated revenues in 2015, stemming primarily
from revenue generated by operating four Boeing 757 combi aircraft.
Description of Business
CAM
CAM leases aircraft to ATSG's airlines and to external customers, including DHL, usually under multi-year contracts
with a schedule of fixed monthly payments. Under a typical lease arrangement, the customer maintains the aircraft in
serviceable condition at its own cost. At the end of the lease term, the customer is typically required to return the
aircraft in approximately the same maintenance condition that existed at the inception of the lease, as measured by
airframe and engine time since the last scheduled maintenance event. CAM examines the credit worthiness of potential
customers, their short and long term growth prospects, their financial condition and backing, the experience of their
management, and the impact of governmental regulation when determining the lease rate that is offered to the customer.
In addition, CAM monitors the customer’s business and financial status throughout the term of the lease.
As of December 31, 2015, CAM’s fleet consisted of 55 serviceable Boeing 767 and 757 cargo aircraft. A complete
list of the Company's aircraft is included in Item 2, Properties. Through CAM, we have expanded in recent years the
Company's combined fleet of Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft and retired less efficient Boeing 727 and McDonnell Douglas
DC-8 freighter aircraft. CAM has managed the modification of passenger aircraft into cargo aircraft as well as purchased
previously modified cargo aircraft. Since the beginning of 2013, CAM has deployed six Boeing 767-300 and five
Boeing 757 aircraft into its fleet.
ACMI Services
Through the Company's two airline subsidiaries, we provide airline operations to DHL, delivery companies, other
airlines, freight forwarders and the U.S. Military. A typical operating agreement requires our airline to supply, at a
specific rate per block hour and/or per month, a combination of aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance ("ACMI")
for specified cargo operations. The customer is responsible for substantially all other aircraft operating expenses,
including fuel, landing fees, parking fees and ground and cargo handling expenses. The airlines also operate charter
agreements, including with the U.S. Military, which require the airline to provide full service, including fuel and other
operating expenses, in addition to aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance, for a fixed, all-inclusive price.
Our airlines operate medium payload and medium wide-body aircraft freighters usually on intra-continental flights
and medium range inter-continental flights. The airlines typically operate our aircraft in the customers' regional networks
that connect to and from global cargo networks. We do not operate larger capacity, long haul inter-continental freighters
such as the Boeing 747 or Airbus A380 aircraft. The freighter types we operate have lower investment and ongoing
maintenance costs and can operate cost efficiently with smaller loads on shorter routes than the larger capacity freighters.
3
Commencing March 31, 2010, the Company and DHL executed commercial agreements under which DHL leased
thirteen Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft from CAM while ABX operates those aircraft under a separate crew,
maintenance and insurance (“CMI”) agreement. The initial term of the CMI agreement was five years while the terms
of the aircraft leases were seven years. In 2015, the Company and DHL amended and restated the CMI agreement
("restated CMI agreement"). As a result, effective April 1, 2015, the existing monthly aircraft lease rates for the Boeing
767-200 freighter aircraft declined approximately 5%, DHL agreed to lease an additional two Boeing 767 aircraft which
were previously supporting DHL under short-term operating arrangements, and all Boeing 767 aircraft lease terms with
DHL were extended through March 2019. Under the restated CMI agreement, ABX continues to operate and maintain
the aircraft through March 2019.
Similar to the previous agreement, pricing for services provided under the restated CMI agreement is based on
pre-defined fees scaled for the number of aircraft hours flown, aircraft scheduled and flight crews provided to DHL for
its network. Under the new pricing structure of the restated CMI agreement, ABX assumes responsibility for the cost
of complying with the Federal Aviation Administration, ("FAA"), airworthiness directives, the cost of Boeing 767
airframe maintenance and certain engine maintenance events for the DHL-leased aircraft that it operates. Although
provisions of the restated CMI agreement negatively impact the Company's operating results, we project that the reduced
earnings from the CMI operations for DHL will be offset through additional aircraft lease revenues, international ACMI
opportunities, cost controls and aircraft maintenance growth.
Our airlines provide airlift to the Air Mobility Command ("AMC") through contracts awarded by the U.S.
Transportation Command ("USTC"), both of which are organized under the U.S. Military. ATI contracts with the AMC
for the operation of its unique fleet of four Boeing 757 "combi" aircraft, which are capable of simultaneously carrying
passengers and cargo containers on the main flight deck. ATI has been operating combi aircraft for the U.S. Military
since 1993. During 2013, ATI retired its four DC-8 combi aircraft and replaced the aircraft with the more modern
Boeing 757 combi aircraft. The USTC awards flights to U.S. certificated airlines through annual contracts and awarded
ATI three international routes for combi aircraft through September of 2016. These routes are not based on or related
to conflicts in the Middle East.
Our airlines participate in the Department of Defense ("DOD") Civil Reserve Air Fleet ("CRAF") program which
entitles our airlines to bid for military cargo charter operations. Our airlines may operate temporary "expansion"
routes for the U.S Military using the Boeing 757 combi and Boeing 767 freighter aircraft. Our participation in the
CRAF program allows the DOD to requisition specified aircraft for military use during a national defense emergency.
Approximately 17% of the Company's consolidated revenues for 2015 were derived from providing airline
operations for customers other than DHL and the U.S. Military. These ACMI and charter operations are typically
provided to delivery companies, freight forwarders or other airlines.
Demand for air cargo services correlates closely with general economic conditions and the level of commercial
activity in a geographic area. Stronger general economic conditions and growth in a region typically increase the need
for product transportation. Historically, the cargo industry has experienced higher volumes during the fourth calendar
quarter of each year due to increased shipments during the holiday season. Generally, time-critical delivery needs,
such as just-in-time inventory management, increase the demand for air cargo delivery, while higher costs of aviation
fuel generally reduces the demand for air delivery services. When aviation fuel prices increase, shippers will consider
using ground transportation if the delivery time allows.
We have limited exposure to fluctuations in the price of aviation fuel under contracts with our customers. DHL,
like most of our ACMI customers, procures the aircraft fuel and fueling services necessary for their flights. Our charter
agreements with the U.S. Military are based on a preset pegged fuel price and include a subsequent true-up to the actual
fuel prices.
Aircraft Maintenance and Modification Services
We provide aircraft maintenance and modification services to other air carriers through our ABX and AMES
subsidiaries. ABX and AMES have technical expertise related to aircraft modifications as a result of ABX’s long history
in aviation. They own many Supplemental Type Certificates (“STCs”). An STC is granted by the FAA and represents
an ownership right, similar to an intellectual property right, which authorizes the alteration of an airframe, engine or
component.
4
AMES operates a Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) certificated 145 repair station in Wilmington, Ohio,
including hangars, a component shop and engineering capabilities. AMES is AS9100 quality certified for the aerospace
industry. AMES markets its capabilities by identifying aviation-related maintenance and modification opportunities
and matching them to its capabilities. AMES’ marketable capabilities include the installation of avionics systems and
flat panel displays for Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft. The flat panel display modernizes aircraft avionics equipment and
reduces maintenance costs by combining multiple display units into a single instrumentation panel. In 2014, the
Company completed the construction of a new hangar facility bringing the total hangar square footage to 310,000. The
hangar provides the capability of servicing airframes as large as the Boeing 747-400 and the Boeing 777 aircraft. AMES
has the capability to perform line maintenance and airframe maintenance on McDonnell Douglas DC-9, MD-80, Boeing
767, 757, 737, 777, 727 and Airbus A320 aircraft. AMES also has the capability to refurbish airframe components,
including approximately 60% of the components utilized by Boeing 767 aircraft.
Aircraft Parts Sales and Brokerage
AMS is an Aviation Suppliers Association 100 certified reseller and broker of aircraft parts. AMS carries an inventory
of Boeing 767, DC-9 and DC-8 spare parts and also maintains inventory on consignment from original equipment
manufacturers, resellers, lessors and other airlines. AMS customers include the commercial air cargo industry, passenger
airlines, aircraft manufacturers and contract maintenance companies serving the commercial aviation industry, as well
as other resellers.
Equipment and Facility Maintenance
LGSTX provides contract maintenance services for material handling equipment and aviation ground support
equipment throughout the U.S. LGSTX has a large inventory of ground support equipment, such as power units,
airstarts, deicers and pushback vehicles that it rents to airports, airlines and other customers. LGSTX is also licensed
to resell aircraft fuel.
Mail and Package Sorting
Since September 2004, we have provided mail sorting services under contracts with the USPS. Our subsidiary,
LDS, manages USPS mail sort centers in Indianapolis, Dallas and Memphis. Under each of these three contracts, we
are compensated at a firm price for fixed costs and an additional amount based on the volume of mail handled at each
sort center. LDS also provides labor for load transfer services to the USPS at two facilities. The contracts for the five
facilities we service have been extended from their original expiration dates in 2014, through March 2017 with renewal
options, at the discretion of the USPS, for periods into 2018. LDS also provides international mail forwarding services
through the Miami International Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport and the Los Angeles International
Airport.
Flight Support
ABX is FAA-certificated to offer flight crew training to customers and rent usage of its flight simulators for outside
training programs. ABX has three flight simulators in operation. ABX’s Boeing 767 and DC-9 flight simulators are
level C certified. The level C flight simulators allow ABX to qualify flight crewmembers under FAA requirements
without performing check flights in an aircraft. The DC-8 simulator is level B certified, which allows ABX to qualify
flight crewmembers by performing a minimum number of flights in an aircraft.
The Company's subsidiary, Global Flight Source, Inc., ("GFS") provides aircraft dispatch and flight monitoring to
ABX and ATI. GFS can provide these services to U.S certificated supplemental air carriers and foreign air carriers.
Competitive Conditions
Our airline subsidiaries compete with other cargo airlines to place aircraft under ACMI arrangements and charter
contracts. Other cargo airlines include Amerijet International, Inc., Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Kalitta Air
LLC, National Air Cargo Group, Inc. and Southern Air, Inc. The primary competitive factors in the air cargo industry
are operating costs, fuel efficiency, geographic coverage, aircraft range, aircraft reliability and capacity. The cost of
airline operations is significantly impacted by the cost of flight crewmembers, which can vary among airlines depending
on their collective bargaining agreements. Cargo airlines also compete for cargo volumes with passenger airlines that
5
have substantial belly cargo capacity. The air cargo industry is capital intensive and highly competitive, especially
during periods of excess capacity of aircraft compared to cargo volumes.
The scheduled delivery industry is dominated by integrated door-to-door carriers including DHL, TNT Holdings
B.V., the USPS, FedEx Corporation and United Parcel Service, Inc. Although the volume of our business is impacted
by competition among these integrated carriers, we do not usually compete directly with them.
Competition for aircraft lease placements is generally affected by aircraft type, aircraft availability and lease rates.
We target our leases to cargo airlines and delivery companies seeking medium widebody airlift. The Airbus A300-600
and A330 aircraft can provide capabilities similar to the Boeing 767 for medium widebody airlift. Competitors in the
aircraft leasing markets include GE Capital Aviation Services and Guggenheim Aviation Partners among others.
The aircraft maintenance industry is labor intensive and typically competes based on cost, capabilities and reputation
for quality. U.S. airlines may contract for aircraft maintenance with maintenance and repair organizations ("MROs")
in other countries or geographies with a lower labor wage base, making the industry highly cost competitive. Other
aircraft MROs include AAR Corp and Hong Kong Aircraft Engineering Co.
Airline Operations
Flight Operations and Control
Each of the Company's airline operations are conducted pursuant to authority granted to them by the FAA and the
Department of Transportation ("DOT"). Airline flight operations, including aircraft dispatching, flight tracking, crew
training and crew scheduling are planned and controlled by personnel within each airline. The Company staffs aircraft
dispatching and flight tracking 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
Aircraft Maintenance
Our airlines’ operations are regulated by the FAA for aircraft safety and maintenance. Each airline performs routine
inspections and airframe maintenance, including Airworthiness Directive and Service Bulletin compliance on all of
their aircraft. The airlines’ maintenance and engineering personnel coordinate routine and non-routine maintenance
requirements. Each airline’s maintenance program includes tracking the maintenance status of each aircraft, consulting
with manufacturers and suppliers about procedures to correct irregularities and training maintenance personnel on the
requirements of its FAA-approved maintenance program. The airlines contract with MROs, including AMES, to perform
heavy maintenance on airframes and engines. Each airline owns and maintains an inventory of spare aircraft engines,
auxiliary power units, aircraft parts and consumable items. The quantity of spare items maintained is based on the fleet
size, engine type operated and the reliability history of the item types.
Safety and Security
Management is committed to the safe operation of its aircraft. The Company’s airlines have instituted various
security procedures and protocols to comply with FAA and Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) regulations.
Extensive safety checks are conducted on a regular basis. In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries conduct
background checks on our respective employees, restrict access to aircraft, inspect aircraft for suspicious persons or
cargo, and inspect all dangerous goods. Comprehensive internal audit and evaluation programs are actively maintained.
Customers are required to inform the airlines in writing of the nature and composition of any freight which is
classified as “Dangerous Goods” by the DOT. Notwithstanding these procedures, our airline subsidiaries could
unknowingly transport contraband or undeclared hazardous materials for customers, which could result in fines and
penalties and possible damage to the aircraft.
Insurance
Our airline subsidiaries are required by the DOT to carry a minimum amount of aircraft liability insurance. Their
aircraft leases, loan agreements and ACMI agreements also require them to carry such insurance. The Company
currently maintains public liability and property damage insurance, and our airline subsidiaries currently maintain
aircraft hull and liability insurance and war risk insurance for their respective aircraft fleets in amounts consistent with
industry standards. CAM’s customers are also required to maintain similar insurance coverage.
6
Employees
As of December 31, 2015, the Company had approximately 2,170 full-time and part-time employees. The Company
employed approximately 330 flight crewmembers, 990 aircraft maintenance technicians and flight support personnel,
445 warehousing, sorting and logistics personnel, 210 employees for airport maintenance and logistics, 20 employees
for sales and marketing and 175 employees for administrative functions. In addition to full time and part time employees,
the Company typically has approximately 450 temporary employees mainly serving the USPS operations and aircraft
line maintenance operations. On December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately 1,810 full-time and part-time
employees.
Labor Agreements
The Company’s flight crewmembers are unionized employees. The table below summarizes the representation of
the Company’s flight crewmembers at December 31, 2015.
Airline
ABX
ATI
Labor Agreement Unit
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Air Line Pilots Association
Contract
Amendable
Date
12/31/2014
5/28/2014
Percentage of
the Company’s
Employees
9.6%
5.6%
Under the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), as amended, the crewmember labor agreements do not expire, so the existing
contract remains in effect throughout any negotiation process. If required, mediation under the RLA is conducted by
the National Mediation Board, which has the sole discretion as to how long mediation can last and when it will end.
In addition to direct negotiations and mediation, the RLA includes a provision for potential arbitration of unresolved
issues and a 30-day “cooling-off” period before either party can resort to self-help, including, but not limited to, a work
stoppage.
Training
The flight crewmembers are required to be licensed in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”),
with specific ratings for the aircraft type to be flown, and to be medically certified as physically fit to operate aircraft.
Licenses and medical certifications are subject to recurrent requirements as set forth in the FARs, to include recurrent
training and minimum amounts of recent flying experience.
The FAA mandates initial and recurrent training for most flight, maintenance and engineering personnel. Mechanics
and quality control inspectors must also be licensed and qualified to perform maintenance on Company operated and
maintained aircraft. Our airline subsidiaries pay for all of the recurrent training required for their flight crewmembers
and provide training for their ground service and maintenance personnel. Their training programs have received all
required FAA approvals. Similarly, our flight dispatchers and flight followers receive FAA approved training on the
airlines' requirements and specific aircraft.
Intellectual Property
The Company owns a small number of U.S. patents that have a nominal commercial value. The Company also
owns many STCs issued by the FAA. The Company uses these STCs mainly in support of its own fleets; however,
AMES has marketed certain STCs to other airlines.
Information Systems
We are increasingly dependent on technology to maintain regulatory compliance, improve information
communications and reduce costs in order to compete effectively. The Company has invested significant management
and financial resources in the development of information systems to facilitate flight and maintenance operations. We
utilize systems to maintain records about the maintenance status and history of each major aircraft component, as
required by FAA regulations. Using the systems, we track and control inventories and costs associated with each
maintenance task, including the personnel performing those tasks. In addition, the Company’s flight operations systems
7
coordinate flight schedules and crew schedules. We have developed and procured systems to track crewmember flight
and duty times, and crewmember training status.
Regulation
Our subsidiaries’ airline operations are generally regulated by the DOT, the FAA and the TSA. Those operations
must comply with numerous economic, safety, security and environmental laws, ordinances and regulations. In addition,
they must also comply with various other federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations.
Environment
Under current federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner
or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or clean-up of hazardous or toxic substances on,
under, or in such property. These laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was
responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, the presence of contamination from
hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to properly clean up contaminated property, may adversely affect the ability
of the owner of the property to use the property as collateral for a loan or to sell such property. Environmental laws
also may impose restrictions on the manner in which a property may be used or transferred or in which a business
located thereon may be operated and may impose remediation or compliance costs. Under its former air park sublease
with DHL, ABX and DHL are required to defend, indemnify and hold each other harmless from and against certain
environmental claims associated with the Air Park in Wilmington, Ohio.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") is authorized to regulate aircraft emissions and has historically
implemented emissions control standards adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization ("ICAO"). In 2015,
however, the EPA issued a proposed finding on GHG emissions from aircraft and its relationship to air pollution. The
final finding is a regulatory prerequisite to the EPA’s adoption of a new certification standard for aircraft emissions.
Our subsidiaries’ aircraft currently meet all known requirements for engine emission levels as applicable by engine
design date. Under the Clean Air Act, individual states or the EPA may adopt regulations requiring reductions in
emissions for one or more localities based on the measured air quality at such localities. These regulations may seek
to limit or restrict emissions by restricting the use of emission-producing ground service equipment or aircraft auxiliary
power units. Further, the U.S. Congress has, in the past, considered legislation that would regulate greenhouse gas
emissions, and some form of federal climate change legislation is possible in the future.
In addition, the European Commission has approved the extension of the European Union Emissions Trading
Scheme ("ETS") for greenhouse gas emissions to the airline industry. Currently, under the European Union’s ETS, all
ABX and ATI flights that are wholly within the European Union are covered by the ETS requirements, and each year
our airlines are required to submit emission allowances in an amount equal to the carbon dioxide emissions from such
flights. If the airline's flight activity during the year produced carbon emissions exceeding the number of carbon
emissions allowances that it had been awarded, the airline must acquire allowances from other airlines in the open
market. ABX and ATI currently operate intra-EU flights and management believes that such flights are operated in
compliance with ETS requirements.
To allow time for negotiations on a global market-based measure applying to aviation emissions, the EU's ETS
requirements were suspended for flights in 2012 to and from non-European countries. For the period 2013-2016, the
legislation has also been amended so that only emissions from flights within the European Economic Area fall under
the EU ETS. Exemptions for operators with low emissions have also been introduced. The EU made this change
following agreement by the ICAO Assembly in October 2013 to develop a global market-based mechanism addressing
international aviation emissions by 2016 and to apply it by 2020. The amended law provides for the European
Commission to report to the European Parliament and Council on the outcome of the 2016 ICAO Assembly and propose
measures as appropriate to take international developments into account with effect from 2017.
Recently, ICAO proposed for adoption greenhouse gas emissions rules applicable to aviation. If the rules are
adopted by the ICAO governing body, they would set emissions standards beginning in 2020. The mechanism to reduce
emissions is based on a reduction in the amount of fuel burned during the cruise portion of flight. The engines used
to power the aircraft currently operated by the Company's airlines comply with the newly proposed standard and would
not require modification to be able to continue to operate after the rule, if adopted as proposed, takes effect. Although
these rules, if adopted, will not apply to any of our airline subsidiaries’ existing aircraft, additional rules could be
8
adopted in the future that would either apply these more stringent noise and emissions standards to aircraft already in
operation or require that some portion of the fleet be converted over time to comply with these new standards.
The federal government generally regulates aircraft engine noise at its source. However, local airport operators
may, under certain circumstances, regulate airport operations based on aircraft noise considerations. The Airport Noise
and Capacity Act of 1990 provides that, in the case of Stage 3 aircraft (all of our operating aircraft satisfy Stage 3 noise
compliance requirements), an airport operator must obtain the carriers’ consent to, or the government’s approval of,
the rule prior to its adoption. We believe the operation of our airline subsidiaries’ aircraft either complies with or is
exempt from compliance with currently applicable local airport rules. However, some airport authorities have adopted
local noise regulations, and, to the extent more stringent aircraft operating regulations are adopted on a widespread
basis, our airline subsidiaries may be required to spend substantial funds, make schedule changes or take other actions
to comply with such local rules.
Department of Transportation
The DOT maintains authority over certain aspects of domestic air transportation, such as requiring a minimum level
of insurance and the requirement that a person be “fit” to hold a certificate to engage in air transportation. In addition,
the DOT continues to regulate many aspects of international aviation, including the award of international routes. The
DOT has issued ABX a Domestic All-Cargo Air Service Certificate for air cargo transportation between all points within
the U.S., the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The DOT has issued ATI certificate authority
to engage in scheduled interstate air transportation, which is currently limited to all-cargo operations. ATI's DOT
certificate authority also authorizes it to engage in interstate and foreign charter air transportation of persons, property
and mail. Additionally, the DOT has issued ABX and ATI Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity authorizing
each of them to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of cargo and mail between the U.S. and all current and
future U.S. open-skies partner countries, which currently consists of over 100 foreign countries. ABX also holds
exemption authorities issued by the DOT to conduct scheduled all-cargo operations between the U.S. and certain foreign
countries with which the U.S. does not have an open-skies air transportation agreement.
By maintaining these certificates, the Company, through its airline subsidiaries, can conduct all-cargo charter
operations worldwide subject to the receipt of any necessary foreign government approvals. Prior to issuing such
certificates, and periodically thereafter, the DOT examines a company’s managerial competence, financial resources
and plans, compliance, disposition and citizenship in order to determine whether the carrier is fit, willing and able to
engage in the transportation services it has proposed to undertake.
The DOT has the authority to impose civil penalties, or to modify, suspend or revoke our certificates and exemption
authorities for cause, including failure to comply with federal laws or DOT regulations. A corporation holding the
above-referenced certificates and exemption authorities must qualify as a citizen of the United States, which, pursuant
to federal law, requires that (1) it be organized under the laws of the U.S. or a state, territory or possession thereof,
(2) that its president and at least two-thirds of its Board of Directors and other managing officers be U.S. citizens,
(3) that less than 25% of its voting interest be owned or controlled by non-U.S. citizens, and (4) that it not otherwise
be subject to foreign control. We believe our airline subsidiaries possess all necessary DOT-issued certificates and
authorities to conduct our current operations and continue to qualify as a citizen of the United States.
Federal Aviation Administration
The FAA regulates aircraft safety and flight operations generally, including equipment, ground facilities,
maintenance, flight dispatch, training, communications, the carriage of hazardous materials and other matters affecting
air safety. The FAA issues operating certificates and operations specifications to carriers that possess the technical
competence to conduct air carrier operations. In addition, the FAA issues certificates of airworthiness to each aircraft
that meets the requirements for aircraft design and maintenance. ABX and ATI believe they hold all airworthiness and
other FAA certificates and authorities required for the conduct of their business and the operation of their aircraft,
although the FAA has the power to suspend, modify or revoke such certificates for cause, or to impose civil penalties
for any failure to comply with federal laws and FAA regulations.
The FAA has the authority to issue regulations, airworthiness directives and other mandatory orders relating to,
among other things, the inspection, maintenance and modification of aircraft and the replacement of aircraft structures,
components and parts, based on industry safety findings, the age of the aircraft and other factors. For example, the FAA
9
has required ABX to perform inspections of its Boeing 767 aircraft to determine if certain of the aircraft structures and
components meet all aircraft certification requirements. If the FAA were to determine that the aircraft structures or
components are not adequate, it could order operators to take certain actions, including but not limited to, grounding
aircraft, reducing cargo loads, strengthening any structure or component shown to be inadequate, or making other
modifications to the aircraft. New mandatory directives could also be issued requiring the Company’s airline subsidiaries
to inspect and replace aircraft components based on their age or condition. As a routine matter, the FAA issues
airworthiness directives applicable to the aircraft operated by our airline subsidiaries, and our airlines comply, sometimes
at considerable cost, as part of their aircraft maintenance program.
In addition to the FAA practice of issuing regulations and airworthiness directives as conditions warrant, the FAA
has adopted new regulations to address issues involving aging, but still economically viable, aircraft on a more systematic
basis. FAA regulations mandate that aircraft manufacturers establish aircraft limits of validity and service action
requirements based on aircraft flight cycles and flight hours before which widespread fatigue damage might occur.
Service action requirements include inspections and modifications to preclude development of widespread fatigue
damage in specific aircraft structural areas. The Boeing Company has provided its recommendations of the limits of
validity to the FAA, and the FAA has now approved the limits for the Boeing 757 and 767 model aircraft. Consequently,
after the limit of validity is reached for a particular model aircraft, air carriers will be unable to continue to operate the
aircraft without the FAA first granting an extension of time to the operator. There can be no assurance that the FAA
would extend the deadline, if one were to be requested. For the oldest aircraft in our fleets, we estimate the limit of
validity would not be reached for at least 20 years.
The FAA requires each of the airline subsidiaries to implement a drug and alcohol testing program with respect to
all employees and, unless already subject to testing, contractor employees that engage in safety sensitive functions.
Each of the airlines comply with these regulations.
Transportation Security Administration
The TSA, an administration within the Department of Homeland Security, is responsible for the screening of
passengers, baggage and cargo and the security of aircraft and airports. Our airline subsidiaries comply with all applicable
aircraft and cargo security requirements. The TSA has adopted cargo security-related rules that have imposed additional
burdens on our airlines and our customers. Among other things, the TSA requires each airline to perform criminal
history background checks on all employees. In addition, we may be required to reimburse the TSA for the cost of
security services it may provide to the Company’s airline subsidiaries in the future.
International Regulations
When operating in other countries, our airlines are subject to aviation agreements between the U.S. and the respective
countries or, in the absence of such an agreement, by principles of reciprocity. International aviation agreements are
periodically subject to renegotiation, and changes in U.S. or foreign governments could result in the alteration or
termination of the agreements affecting our international operations. Commercial arrangements such as ACMI
agreements between our airlines and our customers in other countries, may require the approval of foreign governmental
authorities. Foreign authorities may limit or restrict the use of our aircraft in certain countries. Also, foreign government
authorities often require licensing and business registration before beginning operations.
Other Regulations
Various regulatory authorities have jurisdiction over significant aspects of our business, and it is possible that new
laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations or the interpretations thereof could have a material adverse
effect on our operations. In addition to the above, other laws and regulations to which we are subject, and the agencies
responsible for compliance with such laws and regulations, include the following:
•
•
The labor relations of our airline subsidiaries are generally regulated under the Railway Labor Act, which
vests in the National Mediation Board certain regulatory powers with respect to disputes between airlines
and labor unions arising under collective bargaining agreements;
The Federal Communications Commission regulates our airline subsidiaries’ use of radio facilities pursuant
to the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended;
10
•
•
•
U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspects cargo imported from our subsidiaries’ international
operations;
Our airlines must comply with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services regulations regarding the
citizenship of our employees;
The Company and its subsidiaries must comply with wage, work conditions and other regulations of the
Department of Labor regarding our employees.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information about executive officers of the Company is provided in Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and
Corporate Governance, of this report, and is incorporated in this item by reference.
Available Information
Our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports, are available free of charge from
our website at www.atsginc.com as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC. The SEC maintains an
Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding Air Transport
Services Group, Inc. at www.sec.gov.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The risks described below could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. The risks below
are not the only risks that the Company faces. Additional risks that are currently unknown to us or that we currently
consider immaterial or unlikely could also adversely affect the Company.
The economic conditions in the U.S. and throughout the globe may negatively impact the demand for the Company’s
aircraft and services.
Air cargo transportation volumes are strongly correlated to general economic conditions, including the price of
aviation fuel. An economic downturn could reduce the demand for delivery services offered by DHL and other delivery
businesses, in particular expedited shipping services utilizing aircraft. Further, during an economic slowdown,
customers generally prefer to use ground-based or marine delivery services instead of more expensive air delivery
services. Accordingly, an economic downturn could reduce the demand for airlift and cargo aircraft leases. Additionally,
if the price of aviation fuel rises significantly, the demand for cargo aircraft and air delivery services may decline.
During periods of downward economic trends and rising fuel costs, freight forwarders and integrated delivery businesses
are more likely to defer market expansion plans. As a result, we may experience delays in the deployment of available
aircraft with customers under lease, ACMI or charter arrangements.
The restated CMI agreement with DHL may impact the Company’s operating results and financial condition differently
than historical results.
The restated CMI agreement, which was effective April 1, 2015, contains provisions that effect our operating
results differently than the previous CMI agreement. Under the restated CMI agreement, the cost of Boeing 767 airframe
maintenance is included in the pre-defined price for services that ABX charges to DHL. Previously, DHL was directly
responsible for the costs of airframe maintenance of leased aircraft. Similarly, ABX may be required, under the restated
CMI agreement, to pay certain costs associated with engine maintenance events, previously paid or reimbursed by
DHL.
Our costs incurred in providing airline services could be more than the contractual revenues generated.
Each airline develops business proposals for ACMI, charter, DHL and other operating contracts by projecting
operating costs, crew productivity and maintenance expenses. Projections contain key assumptions, including
maintenance costs, flight hours, aircraft reliability, crewmember productivity and crewmember compensation and
benefits. We may overestimate revenues, the level of crewmember productivity, and/or underestimate the actual costs
of providing services when preparing business proposals. If actual costs are higher than projected or aircraft reliability
is less than expected, future operating results may be negatively impacted.
11
The Company’s airlines rely on flight crews that are unionized. If collective bargaining agreements increase our
costs and we cannot recover such increases, it may be necessary for us to terminate customer contracts or curtail planned
growth. If disagreements arise, airline operations could be interrupted and business could be adversely affected until
agreements are reached with the crewmembers.
The rate of aircraft deployments may impact the Company’s operating results and financial condition.
The Company's future operating results and financial condition will depend in part on our subsidiaries’ ability to
successfully deploy aircraft in operations that provide a positive return on investment. Our success will depend, in
part, on their ability to secure additional cargo volumes from customers, in both U.S. and international markets.
Deploying aircraft in international markets can pose additional risks, regulatory requirements and costs.
The actual demand for Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft may be less than we anticipate. The actual lease rates for aircraft
available for lease may be less than we projected, or new leases may start later than we expect. Further, other airlines
and lessors may be willing to offer aircraft to the market under terms more favorable to lessees.
We may fail to meet the scheduled delivery date for aircraft required by the ATSA.
If CAM cannot meet the agreed delivery schedule for an aircraft lease, AFS may, at its discretion, cancel the aircraft
lease and all related lease payments.
Our airline operating agreements include on-time reliability requirements which can impact the Company's operating
results and financial condition.
Certain of our airline operating agreements contain monthly incentive payments for reaching specific on-time
reliability thresholds. Additionally, such airline operating agreements contain monetary penalties for aircraft reliability
below certain thresholds. As a result, our operating revenues may vary from period to period depending on the
achievement of monthly incentives or the imposition of penalties. Further, an airline could be found in default of an
agreement if it does not maintain minimum thresholds over an extended period of time. If our airlines are placed in
default due to failure to maintain reliability thresholds, the customer may elect to terminate all or part of the services
we provide under certain customer agreements after a cure period.
If ABX fails to maintain aircraft reliability above a minimum threshold under the restated CMI agreement for two
consecutive calendar months or three months in a rolling twelve month period, ABX would be in default of the restated
CMI agreement with DHL. In that event, DHL may elect to terminate the restated CMI agreement, unless ABX maintains
the minimum reliability threshold during a 60-day cure period. If DHL terminates the CMI agreement due to an ABX
event of default, ABX would be subject to a monetary penalty payable to DHL. The monetary penalty starts at $12
million through the first contract year, and amortizes to $3 million during the next two contract years of the restated
CMI agreement.
The Investment Agreement may be terminated by Amazon in the event that clearance under applicable antitrust laws
or DOT approval required for Amazon's exercise of the warrants is not obtained, or if stockholders do not approve an
increase in the number of authorized shares of ATSG common stock required for the warrants issuable to Amazon and
the exercise by Amazon to be exeercisable in full.
Under the recently executed agreements with Amazon, we have issued warrants which, upon their exercise in full,
would exceed the number of ATSG common shares currently authorized by stockholders. The Company’s stockholders
will be asked to approve an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company at the next annual meeting
of stockholders to increase the number of authorized common shares and to approve the exercise in full of the related
warrants. In the event that antitrust clearance or DOT approval is not obtained for Amazon's exercise of the warrants
within six months of the applicable regulatory filing, or if stockholders do not approve at the next annual meeting the
increase in the number of authorized common shares required for Amazon's exercise in full of the warrants, Amazon
may elect to terminate the Investment Agreement. In the event of the termination of the Investment Agreement, the
unvested portion of the warrants would be canceled and terminated. In addition, if Amazon terminated the Investment
Agreement because the Company's stockholders did not approve the increase in the number of common shares required
for Amazon's exercise in full of the warrants, under the terms of the ATSA, Amazon would have no obligation to (i)
pay certain increased monthly charges associated with the operation of each the first five aircraft prior to the third
anniversary of the ATSA and make a one-time payment in an amount constituting the difference between such increased
monthly charges and the monthly charge then in effect between the execution of the ATSA and the third anniversary
12
date; (ii) enter into any aircraft lease with respect to any additional aircraft for which the scheduled delivery date comes
after May 31, 2016; (iii) take delivery of any additional aircraft that are subject to a signed aircraft lease for which the
scheduled delivery date comes after May 31, 2016 (Amazon will be entitled to terminate any such aircraft lease without
penalty); or (iv) enter into any further work orders as provided under the ATSA.
The anticipated strategic and financial benefits of our relationship with Amazon may not be realized.
We entered into the agreements with Amazon with the expectation that the transactions would result in various
benefits including, among others, growth in revenues, improved cash flows and operating efficiencies. Achieving the
anticipated benefits from the agreements is subject to a number of challenges and uncertainties, such as the timing of
aircraft deliveries and unforeseen costs. If we are unable to achieve our objectives or if we experience delays in our
fleet expansion, the expected benefits may be only partially realized or not at all, or may take longer to realize than
expected, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.
The Company's future earnings and earnings per share, as reported under generally accepted accounting principles,
will be impacted by the stock warrants issuable to Amazon.
We expect that the warrants issuable to Amazon will increase the number of diluted shares reported. Further, we
expect that the warrants will be subject to fair value measurements during the periods that they are outstanding.
Accordingly, future fluctuations in the fair value of the warrants may adversely impact the Company's reported earnings
measures.
Under the provisions of airline operating and aircraft lease agreements with customers, customers may be able to
terminate the operating agreements or aircraft lease agreements, subject to early termination provisions.
Customers can typically terminate one or more of the aircraft from their related airline operating agreement for
convenience at any time during the term, subject to a 60 day notice period and paying the Company a fee. Additionally,
the lease agreements may contain provisions for terminating an aircraft lease for convenience, including a notice period
and paying a lump sum amount to the Company.
Amazon may terminate the ATSA in its entirety after providing 180 days of advance notice after the first six months
of the term and paying to the Company a significant termination fee which reduces after the second anniversary of the
ATSA.
DHL may terminate the restated CMI agreement in its entirety after providing 180 days of advance notice after
the first six months of the term and paying a significant termination fee which amortizes down during the term.
The U.S. Military may not renew our contracts or may reduce the number of routes that we operate.
Our contracts with the U.S. Military are typically for one year and are not required to be renewed. The U.S. Military
may terminate the contracts for convenience or in the event we were to fail to satisfy reliability requirements or for
other reasons. The number and frequency of routes is sensitive to changes in military priorities and U.S. defense
budgets.
Our business could be negatively impacted by adverse audit findings by the U.S. Government.
Our U.S. Military contracts are subject to audit by government agencies, including with respect to performance,
costs, internal controls and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. If an audit uncovers improprieties, we
may be subject to civil or criminal penalties, including termination of such contracts, forfeiture of profits, fines and
suspension from doing business with the U.S. Military.
Our participation in the CRAF Program could adversely restrict our commercial business in times of national
emergency.
Both of our airlines participate in the U.S. Civil Reserve Air Fleet (“CRAF”) Program, which permits the U.S.
Department of Defense to utilize participants’ aircraft during national emergencies when the need for military airlift
exceeds the capability of military aircraft.
13
Proposed rules from the DOT, FAA and TSA could increase the Company's operating costs and reduce customer
utilization of airfreight.
New FAA rules for Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest Requirements (FMDRR) for passenger airline operations
became effective in January 2014. The new rules apply to our operation of combi aircraft for the U.S military and
impact the required amount and timing of rest periods for pilots between work assignments and modified duty and rest
requirements based on the time of day, number of scheduled segments, flight types, time zones and other factors. Failure
to remain in compliance with these rules may subject us to fines or other enforcement action.
If applied to cargo carriers, the new rules would require a pilot to have the opportunity to rest for nine hours before
reporting to flight duty and place other restrictions on the number of duty hours in particular time periods. In May
2012, the FAA indicated that it would reconsider its initial decision to exclude cargo pilots from these new requirements.
On reconsideration, the FAA’s original finding was confirmed by the agency. However, the FAA’s determination has
been appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, the outcome of which is currently pending. Also, efforts have been made
to mandate the FMDRR be applied to cargo carriers by amendment to the federal transportation statute. While not
currently required for the Company's cargo operations, if such rest requirements and restrictions were imposed on our
cargo operations, these rules could have a significant impact on the costs incurred by our airlines. The airlines would
attempt to pass such additional costs through to their customers in the form of price increases. Customers, as a result,
may seek to reduce their utilization of aircraft in favor of less expensive transportation alternatives.
The concentration of aircraft types and engines in the Company's airlines could adversely affect our operating and
financial results.
The combined aircraft fleet is concentrated in two aircraft types. If any of these aircraft types encounter technical
difficulties that resulted in significant FAA airworthiness directives or grounding, our ability to lease the aircraft would
be adversely impacted, as would our airlines' operations. The market growth in demand for the Boeing 767 and 757
aircraft types and configurations may be less than we anticipate. Customers may develop preferences for the Airbus
A300-600 and A330 aircraft or other mid-size aircraft types, instead of the Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft.
The cost of aircraft repairs and unexpected delays in the time required to complete aircraft maintenance could negatively
affect our operating results.
Our aircraft provide ACMI services throughout the world, sometimes operating in remote regions. Our aircraft
may experience maintenance events in locations that do not have the necessary repair capabilities or are difficult to
reach. As a result, we may incur additional expenses and lose billable revenues that we would have otherwise earned.
Under the restated CMI agreement with DHL, we are required to provide a spare aircraft while scheduled maintenance
is completed. If delays occur in the completion of aircraft maintenance, we may incur additional expense to provide
airlift capacity and forgo revenues.
Lessees of our aircraft may fail to make contractual payments or fail to maintain the aircraft as required.
Our financial results depend on our lease customers' ability to make rent payments and maintain the related aircraft.
Our customers' ability to make payments could be adversely impacted by changes to their financial liquidity,
competitiveness, economic conditions and other factors. A default of an aircraft lease by a customer could negatively
impact our operating results and cash flows and result in the repossession of aircraft.
While we often require leasing customers to pay monthly maintenance deposits, customers are normally responsible
for maintaining our aircraft during the lease term. Failure of a customer to perform required maintenance and maintain
the appropriate records during the lease term could result in higher maintenance costs, a decrease in the value of the
aircraft, a lengthy delay in or even our inability to place the aircraft in a subsequent lease, any of which could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We rely on third parties to modify aircraft and provide aircraft and engine maintenance.
We rely on certain third party aircraft modification service providers and aircraft and engine maintenance service
providers that have expertise or resources that we do not have. Third party service providers may seek to impose price
increases that could negatively affect our competitiveness in the airline markets. An unexpected termination or delay
involving service providers could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results. A delay in an
aircraft modification could adversely impact our revenues and our ability to place the aircraft in the market. We must
14
manage third party service providers to meet schedules and turn-times and to control costs in order to remain competitive
to our customers.
Delta TechOps, a division of Delta Airlines, Inc., is the primary engine maintenance provider for the Company's
General Electric CF6 engines that power our fleet of Boeing 767-200 aircraft. If Delta TechOps does not complete the
refurbishment of our engines within the contractual turn-times or if we must replace Delta TechOps as the maintenance
provider for some or all of the Company's CF6 engines, our operations and financial results may be adversely impacted.
The Company's operating results could be negatively impacted by disruptions of its information technology and
communication systems.
Our businesses depend heavily on information technology and computerized systems to communicate and operate
effectively. The Company's systems and technologies, or those of third parties on which we rely, could fail or become
unreliable due
to equipment failures, software viruses, cyberattacks, natural disasters, power failures,
telecommunication outages, or other causes. Certain disruptions could prevent our airlines from flying as scheduled,
possibly for an extended period of time, which could have a negative impact on our operating results and reliability.
We continually monitor the risks of disruption, take preventative measures, develop backup plans and maintain
redundancy capabilities. The measures we use may not prevent the causes of disruptions we could experience or help
us recover failed systems quickly.
The costs of maintaining preventive maintenance measures may continue to rise. Further, the costs of recovering
or replacing a failed system could be very expensive.
The costs of our aircraft maintenance facilities could negatively impact our financial results.
We lease and operate a 310,000 square foot aircraft maintenance facility and a 100,000 square foot component repair
shop in Wilmington, Ohio. Accordingly, a large portion of our MRO's operating costs are fixed. As a result, we need
to retain existing aircraft maintenance business levels to maintain a profitable operation. The actual level of revenues
may not be sufficient to cover our operating costs. Additionally, revenues from aircraft maintenance can vary among
periods due to the timing of scheduled maintenance events and the completion level of work during a period.
The Company could violate debt covenants.
The Senior Credit Agreement contains covenants including, among other requirements, limitations on certain
additional indebtedness and guarantees of indebtedness. The Senior Credit Agreement is collateralized by certain of
the Company's Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft that are not collateralized under aircraft loans. Under the terms of the
Senior Credit Agreement, the Company is required to maintain aircraft collateral coverage equal to 150% of the
outstanding balance of the term loan and the maximum capacity of the revolving credit facility or 175% of the outstanding
balance of the term loan and the total funded revolving credit facility, whichever is less. The Senior Credit Agreement
stipulates events of default, including unspecified events that may have material adverse effects on the Company. The
Senior Credit Agreement and aircraft loans cross default. If an event of default occurs, the Company may be forced
to repay, renegotiate or replace the Senior Credit Agreement and loans. In such an event, the Company’s cost of
borrowings could increase, and our ability to modify and deploy aircraft could be limited as a result.
The Company's share buy-back plan may reduce liquidity.
During 2014, the Company's Board of Directors approved a share repurchase plan to buy up to $50 million of
ATSG 's common stock. Future purchases, if any, would be funded from the Company's cash balances and could reduce
the Company's financial liquidity and indirectly add to the Company's indebtedness.
The Company's existing sources of liquidity may not be sufficient if opportunities to expand the aircraft fleet or make
strategic investment in other companies arise.
Opportunities to grow revenues could arise that require more aircraft, an aircraft type that we do not currently
have, or other strategic investments. As of December 31, 2015, the Company's liquidity included $17.7 million of cash
balances and $136.6 million available under the revolving credit facility through the Senior Credit Agreement and,
subject to the creditors consent, $50 million through an accordion feature of the Senior Credit Agreement. The existing
sources of liquidity may not be sufficient to support initiatives for fleet expansion or other strategic investments. Raising
additional sources of credit could result in an increase in our borrowing costs and additional covenant requirements.
15
Operating results may be affected by fluctuations in interest rates.
The Company enters into interest rate derivative instruments from time to time in conjunction with its debt levels.
The Company's Senior Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain derivative instruments for fluctuating
interest rates for at least 50% of the outstanding balance of the new unsubordinated term loan. We typically do not
designate the derivative instruments as hedges for accounting purposes. Future fluctuations in LIBOR interest rates
will result in the recording of gains and losses on interest rate derivatives that the Company holds.
Under the Senior Credit Agreement, interest rates are adjusted quarterly based on the prevailing LIBOR or prime
rates and a ratio of the Company's outstanding debt level to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
expenses ("EBITDA"). At the Company's current debt-to-EBITDA ratio, the unsubordinated term loan and the revolving
credit facility both bear a variable interest rate of 2.18%. Additional debt or lower EBITDA may result in higher interest
rates on the variable rate portion of the Company's debt.
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans and post-retirement healthcare plans for certain eligible
employees. The Company's related pension expense, plans' funded status and funding requirements are sensitive to
changes in interest rates. The plans' funded status and annual pension expense are recalculated at the beginning of each
calendar year using the fair value of plan assets and market-based interest rates at that point in time, as well as assumptions
for asset returns and other actuarial assumptions. Future fluctuations in interest rates including the impact on asset
returns, could result in the recording of additional expense for pension and other post-retirement healthcare plans.
The costs of insurance coverage or changes to our reserves for self-insured claims could affect our operating results
and cash flows.
The Company is self-insured for certain claims related to workers’ compensation, aircraft, automobile, general
liability and employee healthcare. We record a liability for reported claims and an estimate for incurred claims that
have not yet been reported. Accruals for these claims are estimated utilizing historical paid claims data and recent
claims trends. Changes in claim severity and frequency could impact our results of operations and cash flows.
The ability to use net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes
may be further limited.
Limitations imposed on the ability to use net operating losses (“NOLs”) to offset future taxable income could cause
U.S. federal income taxes to be paid earlier than otherwise would be paid if such limitations were not in effect and
could cause such NOLs to expire unused, in each case reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs. Similar rules
and limitations may apply for state income tax purposes.
Changes in the ownership of the Company on the part of significant shareholders could limit our ability to use
NOLs to offset future taxable income. In general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Code”), a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its
pre-change NOLs to offset future taxable income. In general, an ownership change occurs if the aggregate stock
ownership of significant stockholders increases by more than 50 percentage points over such stockholders’ lowest
percentage ownership during the testing period (generally three years).
We may need to reduce the carrying value of the Company’s assets.
The Company owns a significant amount of aircraft, aircraft parts and related equipment. Additionally, the balance
sheet reflects assets for income tax carryforwards and other deferred tax assets. The removal of aircraft from service
or continual losses from aircraft operations could require us to evaluate the recoverability of the carrying value of those
aircraft, related parts and equipment and record an impairment charge through earnings to reduce the carrying value.
We have recorded goodwill and other intangible assets related to acquisitions. If we are unable to achieve the
projected levels of operating results, it may be necessary to record an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value
of goodwill and related intangible assets. Similarly, if we were to lose a key customer or one of our airlines were to
lose its authority to operate, it could be necessary to record an impairment charge.
If the Company incurs operating losses or our estimates of expected future earnings indicate a decline, it may be
necessary to reassess the need for a valuation allowance for some or all of the Company’s net deferred tax assets.
16
Penalties, fines and sanctions levied by governmental agencies or the costs of complying with government regulations
could negatively affect our results of operations.
The operations of the Company’s subsidiaries are subject to complex aviation, transportation, security,
environmental, labor, employment and other laws and regulations. These laws and regulations generally require our
subsidiaries to maintain and comply with a wide variety of certificates, permits, licenses and other approvals. Their
inability to maintain required certificates, permits or licenses, or to comply with applicable laws, ordinances or
regulations could result in substantial fines or, in the case of DOT and FAA requirements, possible suspension or
revocation of their authority to conduct operations.
The costs of maintaining our aircraft in compliance with government regulations could negatively affect our results of
operations and require further investment in our aircraft fleet.
All aircraft in the Company’s fleet were manufactured prior to 1995. Manufacturer Service Bulletins and FAA
regulations and FAA airworthiness directives issued under its “Aging Aircraft” program cause operators of such aged
aircraft to be subject to additional inspections and modifications to address problems of corrosion and structural fatigue
at specified times. The FAA may issue airworthiness directives that could require significant inspections and major
modifications to such aircraft. The FAA may issue airworthiness directives that could limit the usability of certain
aircraft types. In 2012, the FAA issued an airworthiness directive that requires the replacement of the aft pressure
bulkhead on Boeing 767-200 aircraft based on a certain number of landing cycles. As a result, we expect that 24 of
the Company's Boeing 767-200 aircraft will be affected. The cost of compliance is estimated to be $1.0 million per
aircraft over the next ten years.
In addition, FAA regulations require that aircraft manufacturers establish limits on aircraft flight cycles to address
issues involving aging, but still economically viable, aircraft, as described in Item 1 of this report, under "Federal
Aviation Administration." These regulations may increase our maintenance costs and eventually limit the use of our
aircraft.
The FAA and ICAO are in the process of developing programs to modernize air traffic control and management
systems. The FAA's program, Next Generation Air Transportation Systems, is an integrated system that requires
updating aircraft navigation and communication equipment. The FAA has mandated the replacement of current ground
based radar systems with more accurate satellite based systems on our aircraft by 2020. The ICAO is phasing in similar
requirements for aircraft operating in Europe, beginning in 2015. These programs may increase our costs and limit the
use of our aircraft. Aircraft not equipped with advanced communication systems may be restricted to certain airspace.
Failure to maintain the operating certificates and authorities of our airlines would adversely affect our business.
The airline subsidiaries have the necessary authority to conduct flight operations pursuant to the economic authority
issued by the DOT and the safety based authority issued by the FAA. The continued effectiveness of such authority is
subject to their compliance with applicable statutes and DOT, FAA and TSA rules and regulations, including any new
rules and regulations that may be adopted in the future. The loss of such authority by an airline subsidiary could cause
a default of covenants within the Senior Credit Agreement and would materially and adversely affect its airline
operations, effectively eliminating the airline's ability to operate air services.
The Company may be affected by global climate change or by legal, regulatory or market responses to such potential
climate change.
The Company is subject to the regulations of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and state and local
governments regarding air quality and other matters. In part, because of the highly industrialized nature of many of the
locations where the Company operates, there can be no assurance that we have discovered all environmental
contamination or other matters for which the Company may be responsible.
Concern over climate change, including the impact of global warming, has led to significant federal, state and
international legislative and regulatory efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions. The European Commission has
mandated the extension of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme ("ETS") for greenhouse gas emissions to
the airline industry. Under the European Union ETS, all ABX and ATI flights that are wholly within the European
Union are now covered by the ETS requirements, and each year we are required to submit emission allowances in an
amount equal to the carbon dioxide emissions from such flights. Exceedance of the airlines' emission allowances would
require the airlines to purchase additional emission allowances on the open market.
17
Recently, ICAO proposed for adoption greenhouse gas emissions rules applicable to aviation. If the rules are
adopted by the ICAO governing body, they would set emissions standards beginning in 2020. The mechanism to reduce
emissions is based on a reduction in the amount of fuel burned during the cruise portion of flight. The engines used
to power the aircraft currently operated by the Company's airlines comply with the newly proposed standard and would
not require modification to be able to continue to operate after the rule, if adopted as proposed, takes effect.
The U.S. Congress and certain states have also considered legislation regulating greenhouse gas emissions. In
addition, even in the absence of such legislation, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency could regulate greenhouse
gas emissions, especially aircraft engine emissions. The cost to comply with potential new laws and regulations could
be substantial for the Company. These costs could include an increase in the cost of fuel and capital costs associated
with updating aircraft. Until the timing, scope and extent of any future regulation becomes known, we cannot predict
its effect on the Company’s cost structure or operating results. Further, even without such legislation or regulation,
increased awareness and adverse publicity in the global marketplace about greenhouse gas emitted by companies in
the airline and transportation industries could harm our reputation and reduce demand for our services.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company leases portions of the air park in Wilmington, Ohio, under lease agreements with a regional port
authority, the terms of which expire in May of 2019 and June 2036 with options to extend. The leases include corporate
offices, 310,000 square feet of maintenance hangars and a 100,000 square foot component repair shop at the air park.
ABX also has the non-exclusive right to use the airport, which includes one active runway, taxiways and ramp space.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company and its subsidiaries' in-service aircraft fleet consisted of 55 owned aircraft.
The aircraft were all formerly passenger aircraft that have been modified for cargo operations. The aircraft are generally
described as being mid-size or having medium wide-body cargo capabilities. The cargo aircraft carry gross payloads
ranging from approximately 58,000 to 129,000 pounds. These aircraft are well suited for intra-continental flights and
medium range inter-continental flights. Because an airline's flight operations can be hindered by inclement weather,
sophisticated landing systems and other equipment are utilized to minimize the effect that weather may have on flight
operations. For example, ABX’s Boeing 767-200 and 767-300 aircraft are operated for Category III landings. This
allows their crews to land under weather conditions with forward runway visibility of only 600 feet at airports with
Category III Instrument Landing Systems.
The table below shows the combined fleet of aircraft in service condition.
In-service Aircraft as of
December 31, 2015
Aircraft Type
Total Owned
Operating
Lease
Year of
Manufacture
Gross Payload
(Lbs.)
Still Air Range
(Nautical Miles)
767-200 SF (1)
767-300 SF (1)
757-200 PCF (1)
757-200 Combi (2)
Total in-service
36
11
5
4
56
36
11
4
4
55
—
—
1
—
1
1982 - 1987
85,000 - 100,000
1,700 - 5,300
1988 - 1994
121,000 - 129,000
3,200 - 7,100
1984 - 1991
1989 - 1992
68,000
58,000
2,100 - 4,800
2,600 - 4,300
____________________
(1)
These aircraft are configured for standard cargo containers loaded through large standard main deck cargo
doors.
These aircraft are configured as “combi” aircraft capable of carrying passenger and cargo containers on the
main flight deck.
(2)
18
In addition, as of December 31, 2015, CAM had one Boeing 767-200 and two Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft
that are not reflected in the table above. The Boeing 767-200 aircraft discontinued passenger service in 2015 when a
customer's operation ended. The two Boeing 767-300 aircraft were undergoing modification to a standard freighter
configuration and are expected to be completed in 2016.
We believe that our existing facilities and aircraft fleet are appropriate for our current operations. As described in
Note G to the accompany financial statements, we plan to invest in additional aircraft to meet our growth plans. We
may make additional investments in aircraft and facilities if we identify favorable opportunities in the markets that we
serve.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Brussels Noise Ordinance
The Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer ("BIM"), a governmental authority in the Brussels-Capital Region of
Belgium that oversees the enforcement of environmental matters, imposed four separate administrative penalties on
ABX in the approximate aggregate amount of €0.4 million ($0.4 million) for numerous alleged violations of an ordinance
limiting the noise caused by aircraft overflying the Brussels-Capital Region (which is located near the Brussels Airport)
during the period from May 2009 through December 2010. ABX exhausted its appeals with respect to all four of the
administrative penalties. In October 2015, ABX made a monetary payment in satisfaction of the fines.
Other
In addition to the foregoing matters, we are also currently a party to legal proceedings, including FAA enforcement
actions, in various federal and state jurisdictions arising out of the operation of the Company's business. The amount
of alleged liability, if any, from these proceedings cannot be determined with certainty; however, we believe that the
Company's ultimate liability, if any, arising from the pending legal proceedings, as well as from asserted legal claims
and known potential legal claims which are probable of assertion, taking into account established accruals for estimated
liabilities, should not be material to our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable
19
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Common Stock
ATSG's common stock is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol ATSG. The
following table shows the range of high and low prices per share of ATSG common stock for the periods indicated:
2015 Quarter Ended:
December 31, 2015
September 30, 2015
June 30, 2015
March 31, 2015
2014 Quarter Ended:
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
March 31, 2014
Low
High
8.42
7.60
9.04
7.80
6.93
7.27
7.38
5.81
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10.39
10.96
10.96
9.72
High
8.90
9.21
9.57
8.12
Low
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
On March 14, 2016, there were 1,545 stockholders of record of the ATSG’s common stock. The closing price of
the ATSG’s common stock was $14.20 on March 14, 2016.
Dividends
We are restricted from paying dividends on ATSG's common stock in excess of $50.0 million during any calendar
year under the provisions of the Senior Credit Agreement. No cash dividends have been paid or declared.
Stock Repurchases
On August 5, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $50.0 million of outstanding
common stock. The Board's authorization does not require the Company to repurchase a specific number of shares
and the Board may terminate the repurchase program at any time. Repurchases may be made from time to time on the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions. All of the repurchases done by the Company during the fourth
quarter of 2015 were in the open market. There is no expiration date for the repurchase program. The following table
summarizes the Company's repurchases of its common stock during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2015:
Period
October 1, 2015 through October 31,
2015
November 1, 2015 through November
30, 2015
December 1, 2015 through December
31, 2015
Total for the quarter
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
Average Price
paid Per Share
149,655
109,065
114,490
373,210
$
$
$
$
9.21
9.10
9.22
9.18
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans
For the response to this Item, see Item 12.
20
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Program
Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares
That May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Program
149,655
109,065
114,490
373,210
$
$
$
$
41,702,865
40,710,088
39,655,063
39,655,063
Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on a $100 investment in the ATSG’s common
stock with the cumulative total return of a $100 investment in the NASDAQ Composite Index and the cumulative total
return of a $100 investment in the NASDAQ Transportation Index for the period beginning on December 31, 2010 and
ending on December 31, 2015.
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
NASDAQ Composite Index
NASDAQ Transportation Index
100.00
100.00
100.00
59.75
100.53
90.09
50.76
116.92
95.46
102.41
166.19
130.08
108.35
188.78
181.38
127.59
199.95
153.54
21
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto and the information contained in Item 7 of Part II, “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The selected consolidated financial data and the
consolidated operations data below are derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.
2015
As of and for the Years Ended December 31
2013
(In thousands, except per share data)
2012
2014
2011
OPERATING RESULTS:
Continuing revenues
Operating expenses (1) (3)
Net interest expense and other non operating charges (2)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes
Income tax expense
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of
taxes (3)
Net earnings (loss)
$ 619,264
546,474
10,227
62,563
$ 589,592
525,067
12,749
51,776
$ 580,023
566,838
13,544
(359)
$ 607,438
528,750
12,368
66,320
$ 730,133
667,504
21,769
40,860
(23,408)
39,155
2,067
(19,702)
32,074
(2,214)
(19,266)
(19,625)
(3)
(24,672)
41,648
(774)
(16,995)
23,865
(673)
$
41,222
$
29,860
$ (19,628) $
40,874
$
23,192
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE FROM
CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
Basic
Diluted
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
Basic
Diluted
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL DATA:
$
$
0.61
0.60
$
$
0.50
0.49
$
$
(0.31) $
(0.31) $
0.66
0.65
$
$
0.38
0.37
64,242
65,127
64,253
65,211
63,992
63,992
63,461
64,420
63,284
64,085
Cash and cash equivalents
Property and equipment, net (1)
Goodwill and intangible assets (1)
Total assets (4)
Post-retirement liabilities (3)
Long term debt and current maturities, other than leases
Deferred income tax liability (4)
Stockholders’ equity
$
17,697
875,401
38,729
1,042,263
110,166
318,200
96,858
364,157
$
30,560
847,268
39,010
1,011,859
94,368
344,094
83,223
347,489
$
31,699
838,172
39,291
1,019,182
32,865
384,515
95,912
368,968
$
15,442
818,924
92,126
1,016,457
187,533
364,481
27,268
299,256
$
30,503
748,913
93,376
962,171
188,110
346,904
10,982
270,147
____________________
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
In 2011, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $22.1 million on aircraft, $2.8 million on goodwill and $2.3
million on acquired intangibles. In 2013, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $52.6 million on goodwill.
During 2011, in conjunction with the execution of the Senior Credit Agreement (see Note F to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements) the Company terminated its previous credit agreement, which resulted in the write-off
of $2.9 million of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with that credit agreement and recognized $3.9 million of
losses for certain interest rate swaps previously designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments stemming from the
former term loan.
During 2014, ABX offered vested, former employee participants of the qualified pension plan and vested employee
participants of the crewmembers qualified pension plan a one-time option to settle their pension benefit with the Company
through a single payment or a nonparticipating annuity contract. As a result, ABX settled $98.7 million of pension
obligation in December of 2014 from the pension plans assets. The settlement resulted in pre-tax charges of $6.7 million
to continued operations and $5.0 million to discontinued operations for 2014. As a result of fluctuating interest rates and
investment returns, the funded status of the Company's defined benefit pension and retiree medical plans vary from year
to year. (See notes H and K to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.)
In 2015, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-17,
Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (see Note A to the accompanying consolidated financial statements), and
reclassified the Company's deferred tax assets from a current asset to a noncurrent liability for all years presented.
22
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis has been prepared with reference to the historical financial
condition and results of operations of Air Transport Services Group, Inc., and its subsidiaries and should be read in
conjunction with the “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report, our historical financial statements, and the related notes
contained in this report.
INTRODUCTION
The Company leases aircraft, provides air cargo lift and performs aircraft maintenance and other support services
primarily to the air cargo transportation and package delivery industries. Through the Company's subsidiaries, we offer
a range of complementary services to delivery companies, freight forwarders, airlines and government customers. The
Company's principal subsidiaries include two independently certificated airlines, ABX Air, Inc. (“ABX”) and Air
Transport International, Inc. (“ATI”), and an aircraft leasing company, Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. (“CAM”).
The Company has two reportable segments: ACMI Services, which primarily includes the cargo transportation
operations of its airlines, and the CAM segment, which owns and leases cargo aircraft. The Company's other business
operations, which primarily provide support services to the transportation industry, include aircraft maintenance, aircraft
parts sales, ground equipment leasing and mail handling services. These operations do not constitute reportable segments
due to their size.
At December 31, 2015, the Company owned 55 cargo aircraft that were in revenue service. The combined fleets
consisted of 36 Boeing 767-200 aircraft, 11 Boeing 767-300 aircraft, four Boeing 757-200 aircraft and four Boeing
757 "combi" aircraft.
The Company has had long term contracts with DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. and its affiliates ("DHL"),
since August 2003. DHL is the Company's largest customer and accounted for 46%, 55% and 54% of the Company's
consolidated revenues during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In 2010 the Company
and DHL executed commercial agreements under which DHL leased thirteen Boeing 767 freighter aircraft from CAM
and ABX operates those aircraft under a separate crew, maintenance and insurance (“CMI”) agreement. The initial
term of the CMI agreement was five years while the terms of the aircraft leases were seven years. In 2015, the Company
and DHL amended and restated the CMI agreement ("restated CMI agreement"). As a result, effective April 1, 2015,
the existing monthly aircraft lease rates for the thirteen Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft declined approximately 5%,
DHL agreed to lease an additional two Boeing 767 aircraft which were previously supporting DHL under short-term
operating arrangements, and the Boeing 767 aircraft lease terms with DHL were extended through March 2019.
Under the restated CMI agreement, ABX continues to operate and maintain the aircraft through March 2019.
Similar to the previous agreement, pricing for services provided under the restated CMI agreement is based on pre-
defined fees scaled for the number of aircraft hours flown, aircraft scheduled and flight crews provided to DHL for its
network. Under the pricing structure of the restated CMI agreement, ABX assumed responsibility for the cost of
complying with FAA airworthiness directives, the cost of Boeing 767 airframe maintenance and certain engine
maintenance events for the DHL-leased aircraft that it operates. Although provisions of the restated CMI agreement
negatively impact the Company's operating results, we project that the reduced earnings from the CMI operations for
DHL will be offset through additional aircraft lease revenues, international ACMI opportunities, cost controls and
aircraft maintenance growth.
During June and November of 2015, DHL began a long-term lease for two more Boeing 767 aircraft from CAM
which ABX operates under the restated CMI agreement. As of December 31, 2015, the Company, through CAM, leased
17 Boeing 767 aircraft to DHL; 15 of those were being operated by the Company's airlines for DHL. Additionally, the
airlines operated seven CAM owned Boeing aircraft and one DHL leased aircraft under other operating arrangements
with DHL.
23
The U.S. Military comprised 16%, 16% and 17% of the Company's consolidated revenues during the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company's airlines contract their services to the Air Mobility
Command ("AMC"), through the U.S. Transportation Command ("USTC"), both of which are organized under the U.S.
Military. During 2013, ATI retired its four DC-8 combi aircraft and replaced them with three Boeing 757 combi aircraft
operating for the U.S. Military. Our fourth and final Boeing 757 combi aircraft entered service in the first quarter of
2014, after completing the necessary regulatory certification, and serves as a maintenance spare.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Summary
External customer revenues from continuing operations increased by $29.7 million to $619.3 million during 2015
compared to 2014. Excluding directly reimbursed revenues, customer revenues increased 6%, or by $32.6 million
during 2015 compared with 2014. Increased external customer revenues from CAM's leasing operations, aircraft
maintenance services and parcel handling operations were offset by lower revenues from ACMI Services during 2015,
which reflect six fewer Boeing 767 aircraft under ACMI operations compared to 2014.
The consolidated net earnings from continuing operations were $39.2 million for 2015 compared to $32.1 million
for 2014. The pre-tax earnings from continuing operations were $62.6 million for 2015 compared to $51.8 million,
which included a one-time charge of $6.7 million for pension obligation settlements, for 2014. Adjusted pre-tax earnings
from continuing operations, a non-GAAP measure (a definition and reconciliation of adjusted pre-tax earnings follows),
after removing the pension settlement charge, were $61.6 million for 2015 compared to $57.4 million for 2014. Adjusted
pre-tax earnings from continuing operations for 2015 improved compared to 2014 due to additional aircraft lease
revenues and better ACMI Services aircraft utilization, offset by higher aircraft depreciation and more employee
expenses, particularly in our support services businesses.
During 2014, we offered vested, former employee participants of the qualified pension plan and vested employee
participants of the crewmembers qualified pension plan a one-time option to settle their pension benefit with the
Company through a single payment or a nonparticipating annuity contract. As a result, ABX settled $98.7 million of
pension obligations in December of 2014 funded by pension plan assets. The settlement resulted in a pre-tax charge of
$6.7 million to continuing operations.
24
Fleet Summary
The Company’s cargo aircraft fleet is summarized below as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:
2015
2014
2013
ACMI
Services CAM Total
ACMI
Services CAM Total
ACMI
Services CAM Total
In-service aircraft
Aircraft owned
Boeing 767-200
Boeing 767-300
Boeing 757-200
Boeing 757-200 Combi
Total
Operating lease
Boeing 767-200
Boeing 767-300
Boeing 757-200
Total
Other aircraft
Owned Boeing 767-300
under modification
Owned Boeing 757-200
Combi under modification
Owned Boeing 767 available
or staging for lease
13
4
23
7
4 —
4 —
25
30
— —
— —
1 —
1 —
—
2
— —
— —
36
11
4
4
55
—
—
1
1
2
—
—
14
6
22
2
4 —
4 —
28
24
2 —
1 —
— —
3 —
— —
— —
—
1
36
8
4
4
52
2
1
—
3
—
—
1
16
20
6 —
4 —
3 —
29
20
4 —
2 —
— —
6 —
—
—
1
2
36
6
4
3
49
4
2
—
6
1
2
— —
—
As of December 31, 2015, ACMI Services leased 25 of its in-service aircraft internally from CAM. As of
December 31, 2015, 11 of CAM's 23 Boeing 767-200 aircraft shown above and four of the seven Boeing 767-300
aircraft, were leased to DHL and operated by ABX. CAM leased the other twelve Boeing 767-200 aircraft and three
Boeing 767-300 aircraft to external customers, including two Boeing 767-200 aircraft to DHL for another airline. The
carrying values of the total in-service fleet as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $742.6 million, $734.5 million
and $714.8 million, respectively. The table above does not reflect CAM's only Boeing 767-200 passenger aircraft.
Aircraft fleet activity during 2015 is summarized below:
- During the first quarter, two DHL-owned Boeing 767-200 aircraft, previously leased by ABX for operations
in DHL's network, were returned to DHL.
- CAM placed one recently modified Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft with an external customer in February
2015 under a multi-year lease.
- In February 2015, CAM purchased a Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft that ABX was leasing from an external
lessor and began to lease it to ABX.
- ABX returned three Boeing 767-200 freighters to CAM, two of which were leased to external lessees in April
and the third was leased to another external lessee in October.
- During the second quarter, DHL began to lease directly from CAM, three Boeing 767-300 aircraft that ABX
had been providing under shorter term arrangements. ABX continued to operate the aircraft.
- During the second quarter, ATI began to operate a Boeing 757 freighter that DHL leases from a third party.
- During the fourth quarter, DHL transitioned two CAM Boeing 767-200 aircraft leases to another airline in the
Middle East.
25
- External lessees returned two other Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft to CAM, which leased one to another
external customer and the other aircraft to ABX during the fourth quarter of 2015.
- CAM purchased one Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft in June and completed its modification to standard
freighter configuration in November. CAM began to lease that aircraft, which is operated by ABX, to DHL
under a multi-year lease.
- CAM purchased one Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft in July and another one in November, which were both
being modified to standard freighter configuration as of December 31, 2015.
A summary of our revenues and pre-tax earnings from continuing operations is shown below (in thousands):
Revenues from Continuing Operations:
CAM
ACMI Services
Airline services
Reimbursable
Total ACMI Services
Other Activities
Total Revenues
Eliminate internal revenues
Customer Revenues
Pre-Tax Earnings from Continuing Operations:
CAM, inclusive of interest expense
ACMI Services
Airline services
Pension settlement charge
Asset impairment charges
Total ACMI Services
Other Activities
Net unallocated interest expense
Net gain on derivative instruments
Pre-Tax Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Add Pension settlement charge
Add Asset impairment charges
Less Net gain on derivative instruments
Adjusted Pre-Tax Earnings
Years Ending December 31
2014
2013
2015
$
177,789
$
166,303
$
160,342
395,486
37,623
433,109
161,995
772,893
399,376
40,543
439,919
142,294
748,516
418,125
26,379
444,504
117,292
722,138
(153,629)
(158,924)
(142,115)
619,264
$
589,592
$
580,023
57,457
$
53,159
$
66,208
(2,654)
—
—
(2,654)
8,561
(1,721)
920
62,563
—
—
(920)
61,643
$
(5,381)
(6,700)
—
(12,081)
11,363
(1,761)
1,096
51,776
6,700
—
(1,096)
57,380
$
(25,601)
—
(52,585)
(78,186)
12,200
(1,212)
631
(359)
—
52,585
(631)
51,595
$
$
$
Reimbursable revenues shown above include revenues related to fuel, landing fees, navigation fees, aircraft rent
and certain other operating costs that are directly reimbursed to the airlines by their customers. Effective April 1, 2015,
the cost of engine and airframe maintenance for all CAM-owned aircraft operated for DHL are the responsibility of
the airlines, including Boeing 767-200 maintenance costs previously reimbursed directly by DHL. For all periods
presented above, airline services revenues include compensation for maintenance provided by the airlines on aircraft
operated for DHL. Reimbursable revenues declined during 2015 due to lower fuel prices and the return of four DHL-
owned Boeing 767-200 aircraft.
Adjusted pre-tax earnings, a non-GAAP measure, is pre-tax earnings excluding asset impairment charges, interest
rate derivative gains and losses and the pension settlement costs. Management uses adjusted pre-tax earnings to compare
the performance of core operating results between periods. Adjusted pre-tax earnings should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the Company's results as reported under GAAP.
26
2015 and 2014
CAM
CAM offers aircraft leasing and related services to external customers and also leases aircraft internally to the
Company's airlines. Aircraft leases normally cover a term of five to eight years. In a typical leasing agreement,
customers pay rent and maintenance deposits on a monthly basis.
CAM's revenues grew $11.5 million during 2015 compared to 2014, primarily as a result of additional aircraft
leases. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, CAM had 30 and 24 aircraft under lease to external customers, respectively.
Revenues from external customers totaled $93.4 million and $77.7 million for 2015 and 2014, respectively. CAM's
revenues from the Company's airlines totaled $84.4 million during 2015, compared to $88.6 million for 2014. Since
mid-2014, we have added four Boeing 767 freighter aircraft to CAM's lease portfolio through December 31, 2015.
CAM's pre-tax earnings, inclusive of an interest expense allocation, were $57.5 million and $53.2 million during
2015 and 2014, respectively. Increased earnings reflect additional external lease revenues and lower interest expense,
offset by higher depreciation expense for additional Boeing 767-300 and Boeing 757 aircraft and increased expenses
to place and support the larger fleet of Boeing aircraft.
During 2015, CAM purchased four 767-300 aircraft, one in each quarter. Two of the aircraft were in service by
the end of 2015, and two were being modified from passenger to freighter configuration. One of the aircraft was
completed and leased in February 2016, and we expect the second aircraft to compete conversion during the second
quarter of 2016. As described on page 2, under Item 1 of this report, CAM has entered an agreement to lease 20 Boeing
767 freighter aircraft to Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. ("AFS') a subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”),
including 12 Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft for a term of five years and eight Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft for
a term of seven years. Leases for six of these aircraft will commence April 1, 2016 and nine more aircraft leases are
expected to be executed by the end of 2016. To meet the 20 aircraft requirement for AFS, CAM plans to add eight
more Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft to its fleet by mid-2017. The remaining aircraft commitment for AFS will be
filled by five aircraft currently operated for AFS by the Company's airlines, expiring aircraft leases presently with
external CAM lessees, as well as aircraft currently being utilized by the Company's airlines for charter operations and
other customer services.
ACMI Services
The ACMI Services segment provides airline operations to its customers, typically under contracts providing for
a combination of aircraft, crews, maintenance and insurance ("ACMI"). Our customers are usually responsible for
supplying the necessary aviation fuel and cargo handling services and reimbursing our airline for other operating
expenses such as landing fees, ramp expenses, certain aircraft maintenance expenses and fuel procured directly by the
airline. Aircraft charter agreements, including those for the U.S. Military, usually require the airline to provide full
service, including fuel and other operating expenses for a fixed, all-inclusive price. As of December 31, 2015, ACMI
Services included 41 in-service aircraft, including 25 leased internally from CAM, one DHL-supplied aircraft operated
by ATI and 15 CAM-owned freighter aircraft which are under lease to DHL and operated by ABX under the restated
CMI agreement.
Revenues from ACMI Services declined $6.8 million during 2015 compared with 2014 to $433.1 million. Airline
services revenues from external customers, which do not include revenues for the reimbursement of fuel and certain
operating expenses, declined $3.9 million. Lower revenues reflect fewer aircraft being operated for our customers and
contract rate changes under the restated CMI agreement with DHL compared to 2014. Billable block hours declined
2% for 2015 compared to 2014. Excluding billable block hours for DHL, block hours grew 22% for 2015 compared
to 2014. Block hours flown for the U.S. Military were up 3% compared to 2014.
ACMI Services incurred pre-tax losses of $2.7 million during 2015, compared to pre-tax losses of $12.1 million
for 2014. Excluding pension settlement charges of $6.7 million recorded during 2014, ACMI Services incurred pre-
tax losses of $2.7 million and $5.4 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Smaller pre-tax losses in 2015 compared
to 2014 were primarily a result of improved fleet utilization and more routes for our customers, other than DHL. Since
mid 2014, ACMI Services returned under-utilized aircraft to CAM, which subsequently leased those aircraft to external
customers.
27
The ACMI Services segment contributed positively to the Company's pre-tax earnings for the fourth quarter of
2015, reflecting a fully deployed fleet and a trial air network in the U.S. for AFS. The network, which began in mid-
September 2015 and grew to utilize five aircraft, will expand during 2016 and 2017 to 20 CAM aircraft under an Air
Transportation Services Agreement executed with AFS (the “ATSA”) in March 2016. During 2016, we expect higher
expenses for start-up costs related to the AFS network, pension as actuarially determined, and aircraft maintenance
expenses due to the schedule of heavy maintenance checks. Achieving profitability in ACMI Services will depend on
a number of factors, including revenue levels for airline services, crewmember training costs, crewmember productivity,
employee benefits, aircraft maintenance schedules and the number of aircraft we operate.
Other Activities
The Company sells aircraft parts and provides aircraft maintenance and modification services primarily through
its aircraft maintenance and repair business, Airborne Maintenance and Engineering Services, Inc. ("AMES"). The
Company also provides services to the U.S. Postal Service (“USPS”), which mainly consists of mail and package sorting
services at five USPS facilities. The Company also leases and maintains ground support equipment and provides facility
maintenance services. Other activities also include the management of workers' compensation claims under an
agreement with DHL and gains from the reduction in employee post-retirement obligations.
External customer revenues from all other activities were $93.9 million and $72.0 million for 2015 and 2014,
respectively. Revenues from our mail and package handling services increased $13.3 million during 2015 compared
to 2014, reflecting higher contractual costs and increased mail volumes at the USPS facilities we operate, as well as
parcel handling services, during the fourth quarter of 2015, for the AFS trial U.S. network. Additionally, aircraft
maintenance revenues from external customers increased by $7.3 million. Revenues from aircraft maintenance can
vary among periods due to the timing of scheduled maintenance events and the completion level of work during a
period.
The pre-tax earnings from other activities decreased by $2.8 million to $8.6 million in 2015. Improved earnings
from increased revenues during 2015, were offset by lower gains from the reduction of employee benefit obligations
compared to 2014, and additional unallocated corporate expenses to support growth initiates.
Expenses from Continuing Operations
Salaries, wages and benefits expense increased $15.3 million during 2015 compared to 2014 driven by higher
headcount for maintenance and other support services. Pension expense for continuing operations, excluding the 2014
pension settlement expense of $6.7 million, increased $4.3 million due to a lower interest rate on pension plan obligations
at the beginning of 2015 and other retiree benefit expenses increased $2.8 million during 2015 compared to 2014.
While the number of airline employees increased 4% during 2015 compared to 2014, total headcount increased 20%
during 2015 compared to 2014 as we added employees for facility maintenance, package sorting and aircraft maintenance
operations, driven by additional revenue opportunities and expanded hangar capabilities. For 2016, we expect pension
expense for continuing operations to increase $9.5 million compared to 2015.
Fuel expense decreased by $0.9 million during 2015 compared to 2014. The average price per gallon of aviation
fuel decreased about 19% for 2015 compared to 2014. Fuel expense includes the cost of fuel to operate U.S. Military
charters, reimbursable fuel billed to DHL and other ACMI customers, as well as fuel used to position aircraft for service
and for maintenance purposes. The decrease in the average price per gallon of fuel was offset by a higher level of
customer reimbursed fuel which increased $3.7 million in 2015 compared to 2014.
Maintenance, materials and repairs expense increased by $4.5 million during 2015 compared to 2014. The increase
stemmed primarily from additional airframe checks and related component repairs, partially offset by lower engine
maintenance expense driven by fewer block hours flown. Aircraft maintenance expenses can vary among periods due
to the number of scheduled airframe maintenance checks and the scope of the checks that are performed.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $17.2 million during 2015 compared to 2014. The increase in
depreciation expense reflects incremental depreciation expense for four Boeing 767-300 aircraft added to the in-service
fleet since mid-2014 and additional aircraft engines, capitalized heavy maintenance and navigation technology upgrades.
We expect depreciation expense to increase during future periods in conjunction with our fleet expansion and capital
spending plans.
28
Travel expense increased by $0.3 million during 2015 compared to 2014. The increase reflects the higher level
of employee headcount in airline operations during 2015 compared to 2014.
Contracted ground and aviation services expense includes navigational services, aircraft and cargo handling services
and other airport services. Contracted ground and aviation services increased $5.7 million due to additional volumes
of mail and packages processed for customers compared to 2014.
Rent expense decreased by $15.0 million during 2015 compared to 2014. Rent expense decreased primarily due
to the purchase of two Boeing 767-300 aircraft in September 2014 and the return of four Boeing 767-200 aircraft which
were previously leased from an external provider during 2014.
Landing and ramp expense, which includes the cost of deicing chemicals, decreased by $0.6 million during 2015
compared to 2014. Landing and ramp fees can vary based on the flight schedules and the airports that are used in a
period.
Insurance expense decreased by $1.7 million during 2015 compared to 2014. Aircraft fleet insurance has decreased
due to fewer aircraft in ACMI operations during 2015 compared to 2014.
Other operating expenses increased by $3.2 million during 2015 compared to 2014. Other operating expenses
include professional fees, employee training, utilities, the cost of parts sold to customers and gains on the disposition
of equipment. Other operating expenses increased due to higher professional expenses to support growth initiatives,
higher taxes at certain locations, offset by larger gains from the disposition of equipment during 2015 compared to
2014. During 2016, we expect additional professional fees and other expenses in support of the ATSA.
Interest expense decreased by $2.7 million during 2015 compared to 2014. Interest expense decreased due to a
lower average debt level and interest rates on the Company's outstanding loans during 2015 compared to 2014.
The Company recorded pre-tax net gains on derivatives of $0.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2015
compared to $1.1 million during 2014, reflecting the impact of fluctuating market interest rates.
Income tax expense from continuing operations increased $3.7 million for 2015 compared to 2014, due to higher
pre-tax earnings. The Company's effective income tax rate from continuing operations was 37.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2015 as compared to 38.1% for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in the effective tax
rate primarily reflects a lower ratio of non-deductible expenses to pre-tax income in 2015 compared to 2014.
We estimate that the Company's effective tax rate for 2016 will be approximately 38.6% before giving effect to
the provisions of the recent agreements reached with Amazon in March 2016. We project this increase in the effective
tax rate due to the apportionment of more pre-tax earnings to states with higher income tax rates in 2016. As of
December 31, 2015, the Company had operating loss carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes of
approximately $78.9 million, which will begin to expire in 2025 if not utilized before then. We expect to utilize the
loss carryforwards to offset federal income tax liabilities in the future. As a result, we do not expect to pay federal
income taxes until 2019 or later. The Company may, however, be required to pay alternative minimum taxes and certain
state and local income taxes before then. The Company's taxable income earned from international flights are primarily
sourced to the United States under international aviation agreements and treaties. If we begin to operate in countries
without such agreements, the Company could incur additional foreign income taxes.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations relate to hub operations and aircraft fuel services that ABX provided to DHL under previous
agreements through 2009. The financial results of discontinued operations primarily reflect pension, workers'
compensation cost adjustments and other benefits for former employees previously associated with ABX's former hub
operations, package sorting and aircraft fueling services provided to DHL. Pre-tax earnings related to the former sorting
operations were $3.2 million for 2015 compared to pre-tax losses of $3.5 million for 2014. During 2014, pension
expense for discontinued operations included approximately $5.0 million due primarily to the effects of the pension
settlement charge for former sorting operation employees. Pre-tax earnings during 2015 were primarily a result of
pension credits due to the strong funded status of the pension plans at the beginning of 2015.
29
2014 compared to 2013
Summary
External customer revenues from continuing operations increased by $9.6 million to $589.6 million during 2014
compared to 2013. Excluding directly reimbursed revenues, customer revenues decreased 1%, or by $4.6 million during
2014 compared with 2013. Increased external customer revenues from CAM, aircraft maintenance and support services
were offset by lower revenues from airline services. Airline service revenues declined primarily due to the
discontinuation of ACMI service for DHL's Middle East operations in the first quarter of 2014.
The consolidated net earnings from continuing operations were $32.1 million for 2014 compared with a net loss
of $19.6 million for 2013. The pre-tax earnings from continuing operations were $51.8 million for 2014, including a
one-time charge of $6.7 million for pension obligation settlements. The pre-tax loss from continuing operations for
2013 was $0.4 million which included a goodwill impairment charge of $52.6 million that is not deductible for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. Adjusted pre-tax earnings from continuing operations, a non-GAAP measure (a definition
and reconciliation of adjusted pre-tax earnings follows), after removing the pension settlement charge and the
impairment charge, were $57.4 million for 2014 compared to $51.6 million for 2013. Adjusted pre-tax earnings from
continuing operations for 2014 increased compared to 2013 due to operating improvements primarily in the ACMI
Services segment. Improved earnings were driven by improved fleet utilization, including deployment of the more
fuel efficient Boeing 757 combi aircraft for the U.S. Military, reduced employee expenses and lower aircraft maintenance
expenses compared to 2013.
The notification from DHL that it would cease using three ATI Boeing 767 aircraft for services in the Middle East
by the end of February 2014 and stagnant growth conditions, including projections published by the U.S. Military that
reflected continued reductions in their demand for cargo (non combi) airlift caused us to allocate fewer Boeing 767
aircraft to ATI. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $52.6 million at the end of 2013 to write-off ATI's
goodwill. Subsequently, beginning in 2014, we have deployed more Boeing 767 aircraft with external airlines.
Fleet Summary 2014 & 2013
As of December 31, 2014, ACMI Services leased 28 aircraft internally from CAM. As of December 31, 2014, 13
of CAM's 22 Boeing 767-200 aircraft were leased to DHL and operated by ABX. CAM leased the other nine Boeing
767-200 and two Boeing 767-300 aircraft to external airlines. Aircraft fleet activity during 2014 is summarized below:
- CAM completed the modification of one Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft and it was available for lease until
it was placed with an external customer in February, 2015 under a multi-year lease.
- CAM completed the modification of one Boeing 757 combi aircraft and leased the aircraft internally to ATI,
which deployed the aircraft for the U.S. Military.
- ABX returned two Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft and ATI returned one Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft
and two Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft to CAM. CAM leased two Boeing 767-200 aircraft and two Boeing
767-300 aircraft to external customers and leased a Boeing 767-200 to ABX for peak season flying.
- Near the end of September 2014, CAM purchased the two Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft that ABX was
leasing from an external lessor and began to lease them to ABX.
- During the fourth quarter of 2014, ABX began leasing one Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft from an external
lessor. (CAM purchased this aircraft in February 2015 and subsequently leased it to ABX.)
- Two DHL-owned Boeing 767-200 aircraft, previously leased by ABX for operation in DHL's network, were
returned to DHL.
- CAM's only Boeing 767-200 passenger aircraft was under lease to an external airline at December 31, 2014.
As of December 31, 2013, ACMI Services leased 29 aircraft internally from CAM. As of December 31, 2013, 13
of CAM's 20 Boeing 767-200 aircraft were leased to DHL and operated by ABX. CAM leased the other seven Boeing
767-200 aircraft to external airlines. Aircraft fleet activity during 2013 is summarized below:
- CAM completed the modification of one Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft and leased the aircraft internally to
ABX.
30
- CAM completed the modification of one Boeing 757 freighter aircraft and leased the aircraft internally to ATI.
- CAM purchased two Boeing 757 combi aircraft that had not been certified for airworthiness. CAM completed
the airworthiness requirements for three Boeing 757 combi aircraft and leased them internally to ATI, which
deployed the aircraft for the U.S. Military.
- We removed four DC-8 combi aircraft from the in-service fleet.
CAM
As of December 31, 2014, CAM had 53 freighter aircraft either under or available for lease, 28 of them were leased
internally to the Company's airlines. CAM's revenues grew $6.0 million during 2014 compared to 2013, primarily as
a result of additional aircraft leases to external customers. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, CAM had 24 and 20
aircraft under lease to external customers, respectively. Revenues from external customers totaled $77.7 million and
$71.6 million for 2014 and 2013, respectively. CAM's revenues from the Company's airlines totaled $88.6 million
during 2014, compared to $88.7 million for 2013. CAM's 2014 revenues were temporarily reduced during the time
necessary to prepare and transfer four aircraft to external customers.
CAM's pre-tax earnings, inclusive of an interest expense allocation, were $53.2 million and $66.2 million during
2014 and 2013, respectively. Reduced earnings reflect additional external lease revenues offset by higher depreciation
expense for Boeing 767 and Boeing 757 aircraft and increased expenses to place and support the larger fleet of Boeing
767 and 757 aircraft.
During 2014, CAM's fourth and final Boeing 757 combi aircraft completed its airworthiness certification and began
operations for ATI. CAM purchased two Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft in September of 2014 and leased the aircraft
to ABX. CAM completed the modification of a Boeing 767-300 in the first quarter of 2014. As of December 31, 2014,
CAM had one Boeing 767-300 aircraft available for lease. The aircraft was subsequently placed with an external
customer in February 2015 under a multi-year lease.
ACMI Services
Revenues from ACMI Services declined $4.6 million during 2014 compared with 2013 to $439.9 million. Airline
services revenues from external customers, which do not include revenues for the reimbursement of fuel and certain
operating expenses, declined $18.7 million. Lower revenues resulted primarily from operating fewer international
cargo lanes for our customers, including the DHL routes in the Middle East and for the U.S. Military. Billable block
hours declined 7% for 2014 compared to 2013. Excluding billable block hours for DHL's Middle East operations which
ATI stopped servicing in February 2014, block hours grew 2% for 2014 compared to 2013. Block hours flown for the
U.S. Military were down 1% compared to 2013, due to fewer ad hoc and expansion flying opportunities.
ACMI Services incurred pre-tax losses of $12.1 million during 2014, compared to pre-tax losses of $78.2 million
for 2013. Excluding pension settlement charges of $6.7 million and asset impairment charges of $52.6 million recorded
during 2014 and 2013, respectively, ACMI Services incurred pre-tax losses of $5.4 million and $25.6 million in 2014
and 2013, respectively. Smaller pre-tax losses in 2014 compared to 2013 were primarily a result of improved fleet
utilization, lower aircraft maintenance expense and reduced airline personnel expenses. During 2014, ACMI Services
returned under-utilized aircraft to CAM, which subsequently leased those aircraft to external customers. Additionally,
the number of scheduled airframe heavy checks that were expensed declined by three during 2014 compared to 2013.
Beginning in May of 2014, DHL terminated the services of three of the Company's Boeing 767 aircraft which
ABX operated under short term contracts in lower volume U.S. markets and replaced them with smaller Boeing 737
aircraft operated by another airline. ABX submitted bids to DHL to retain the operation of four Boeing 767-200 aircraft
owned by DHL and which were operated by ABX under the CMI agreement. However, in August 2014, ABX received
termination notices for these four aircraft and at the end of 2014, two of the DHL-owned Boeing 767-200 aircraft were
returned to DHL. The last two DHL-owned Boeing 767-200 aircraft were returned to DHL by the end of the first
quarter of 2015.
31
Other Activities
External customer revenues from all other activities were $72.0 million and $63.9 million for 2014 and 2013,
respectively. Revenues from services provided to the USPS increased $3.9 million during 2014 primarily due to
increased volumes handled by the facilities that we operate for the USPS. In addition to the increased revenues from
the USPS, aircraft maintenance revenues from external customers increased by $3.2 million.
The pre-tax earnings from other activities were $11.4 million and $12.2 million for 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The decrease of $0.8 million of pre-tax earnings for 2014 compared to 2013 primarily reflected additional personnel
costs to support increased business volumes processed for the USPS and the start up of expanded aircraft maintenance
operations which began in mid-2014.
In 2014, AMES expanded into a new 100,000 square foot aircraft hangar facility adjacent to the existing aircraft
maintenance facility in Wilmington, Ohio. We began to make lease payments for the new hangar during 2014.
Additionally, we incurred other incremental costs associated with the new hangar, including the costs of aircraft
maintenance personnel, as we sought to grow aircraft maintenance revenues utilizing the expanded hangar capabilities.
Expenses from Continuing Operations
Salaries, wages and benefits expense decreased $8.9 million during 2014 compared to 2013 due to lower pension
expense and a reduced number of airline employees. Pension expense for continuing operations decreased $7.5 million
during 2014 due to strong investment returns on pension plan assets and the impact of a higher interest rate on pension
plan obligations at the beginning of 2014. The number of airline employees declined 18% during 2014 compared to
2013. Total headcount increased slightly during 2014 compared to 2013 as we added employees for facility and aircraft
maintenance operations, driven by additional revenue and expanded hangar capabilities.
Fuel expense increased by $4.1 million during 2014 compared to 2013. Fuel expense reflects the cost of fuel to
operate U.S. Military charters, reimbursable fuel billed to DHL and fuel used to position aircraft for service and for
maintenance purposes. The increase reflects a higher level of customer reimbursed fuel which increased $16.2 million
in 2014 compared to 2013. The cost of fuel that is not reimbursed declined due to lower prices for aviation fuel and
the operation of more fuel efficient Boeing 757 combi aircraft, which replaced the DC-8 aircraft previously operated
for the U.S Military. The average price per gallon of fuel decreased about 3.4% for 2014 compared to 2013.
Maintenance, materials and repairs expense decreased by $5.5 million during 2014 compared to 2013. Maintenance
expense decreased due to fewer block hours flown and fewer airframe heavy checks performed during 2014 compared
to 2013.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $16.5 million during 2014 compared to 2013. The increase in
depreciation expense reflects incremental depreciation expense for four Boeing 767 aircraft, one Boeing 757 freighter
aircraft and four Boeing 757 combi aircraft added to the in-service fleet since mid-2013, offset by the removal of the
DC-8 combi aircraft from service.
Travel expense decreased by $1.0 million during 2014 compared to 2013. The decrease reflects the lower level
of employee headcount in airline operations and less international travel needed to support fewer international flight
operations during 2014 compared to 2013.
Rent expense decreased by $0.8 million during 2014 compared to 2013. Rent expense decreased primarily due to
the purchase of two Boeing 767-300 aircraft in 2014 which were previously leased from an external provider.
Landing and ramp expense decreased by $0.9 million during 2014 compared to 2013. The decrease was due to
the reduction in block hours and flights operated in 2014 compared to 2013.
Insurance expense decreased by $0.9 million during 2014 compared to 2013. While aircraft fleet insurance has
declined as the DC-8 aircraft were retired, the cost of employee insurance rose during 2014 compared to 2013.
Other operating expenses increased by $1.5 million during 2014 compared to 2013. Other operating expenses
increased due to additional parts sold to aircraft maintenance customers and lower gains from the sale of spare equipment
during 2014.
Interest expense decreased by $0.3 million during 2014 compared to 2013. Interest expense decreased due to a
lower average debt level and interest rates on the Company's outstanding loans during 2014 compared to 2013. Lower
32
interest expenses were partially offset by less capitalized interest during 2014. Capitalized interest was $0.9 million
higher in 2013 while aircraft were undergoing the freighter modification process.
The Company recorded pre-tax net gains on derivatives of $1.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2014
compared to $0.6 million during 2013, reflecting the impact of fluctuating market interest rates.
Income tax expense from continuing operations increased $0.4 million for 2014 compared to 2013, due to higher
pre-tax earnings. The Company's effective income tax rate from continuing operations was 38.1% for the year ended
December 31, 2014. The effective tax rate from continuing operations was approximately 36.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2013 after adjusting for $52.6 million of non-deductible impairment charges. The increase in the effective
tax rate primarily reflects increased state income taxes as proportionally more earnings occurred in the U.S. during
2014 compared to 2013.
Discontinued Operations
Pre-tax losses related to the former hub and sorting operations were $3.5 million for 2014 compared to pre-tax
losses of less than $0.1 million for 2013. During 2014, pension expense for discontinued operations increased
approximately $3.6 million due primarily to the effects of the pension settlement charge for former sorting operation
employees.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
Net cash generated from operating activities totaled $173.7 million, $148.8 million and $94.4 million in 2015,
2014 and 2013, respectively. Improved cash flows generated from operating activities during 2015 compared to 2014,
reflecting additional aircraft leases which are typically paid faster than revenues related to ACMI services, additional
collections from DHL and the timing of vendor payments at the end of the year. Cash flows generated from operating
activities increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to additional payments received from DHL, decreased
pension contributions and better operating profitability. Cash outlays for pension contributions were $6.2 million, $6.1
million and $27.5 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Capital spending levels were primarily the result of aircraft modification costs and the acquisition of aircraft for
freighter modification. Cash payments for capital expenditures were $158.7 million, $112.2 million and $112.7 million
in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Capital expenditures in 2015 included $78.3 million for the acquisition of four
Boeing 767-300 aircraft, freighter modification costs and next generation navigation modifications; $45.3 million for
required heavy maintenance; and $35.1 million for other equipment, including purchases of aircraft engines and rotables.
Our capital expenditures in 2014 included $61.9 million for the acquisition of two Boeing 767-300 aircraft and next
generation navigation modifications; $26.0 million for required heavy maintenance; $7.3 million for construction of
the new aircraft hangar; and $17.0 million for other equipment, including purchases of aircraft engines and rotables.
Our capital expenditures in 2013 included $79.0 million for the acquisition of two Boeing 757 combi aircraft and the
costs of Boeing 757 and Boeing 767 aircraft modifications; $23.9 million for required heavy maintenance; $6.7 million
for construction of the new aircraft hangar; and $3.1 million for other equipment costs. During 2014, we made an
investment in West Atlantic AB for $15 million.
Cash proceeds of $6.8 million, $3.6 million and $1.5 million were received in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively,
for the sale of aircraft engines, airframes and parts.
Net cash used for financing activities was $34.7 million and $26.3 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Net
cash provided by financing activities was $26.2 million in 2013. Our borrowing activities were necessary to acquire
and modify aircraft for deployment into air cargo markets and modernize the combi fleet we operate for the U.S.
Military. During 2015, we drew $45.0 million from the revolving credit facility under the Senior Credit Agreement to
fund capital spending and we made debt principal payments of $69.3 million. Since May 2015, we have spent $10.3
million to buy 1,079,167 shares of the Company's common stock in the open market through December 31, 2015,
pursuant to a share repurchase plan authorized in 2014 by the Board of Directors to repurchase up to $50 million of
the Company's common stock.
33
Commitments
The table below summarizes the Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments (in thousands)
as of December 31, 2015.
Contractual Obligations
Payments Due By Period
Total
Less Than
1 Year
2-3
Years
4-5
Years
After 5
Years
Long term debt, including interest payments
$ 345,189
$
42,468
$ 59,676
$ 243,045
$
—
Facility leases
Aircraft and modification obligations
Other leases
35,611
174,562
675
7,612
131,662
394
11,465
42,900
247
3,586
12,948
—
34
—
—
Total contractual cash obligations
$ 556,037
$ 182,136
$ 114,288
$ 246,665
$ 12,948
The long term debt bears interest at 2.55% to 7.36% per annum. For additional information about the Company's
debt obligations, see Note F of the accompanying financial statements.
The Company provides defined benefit pension plans to certain employee groups. The table above does not include
cash contributions for pension funding, due to the absence of scheduled maturities. The timing of pension and post-
retirement healthcare payments cannot be reasonably determined, except for $7.0 million expected to be funded in
2016. For additional information about the Company's pension obligations,see Note H of the accompanying financial
statements.
We estimate that capital expenditures for 2016 will total $290 million of which $75 million will be for aircraft
maintenance and other equipment and $215 million will be related to aircraft purchases and freighter modifications.
Actual capital spending for any future period will be impacted by aircraft acquisitions, maintenance and modification
processes. We expect to finance the capital expenditures from current cash balances, future operating cash flow and
the Senior Credit Agreement. The Company outsources a significant portion of the aircraft freighter modification
process to a non-affiliated third party. The modification primarily consists of the installation of a standard cargo door
and loading system. For additional information about the Company's aircraft modification obligations, see Note G of
the accompanying financial statements.
In September 2015, we entered into a joint venture agreement to establish an express cargo airline serving multiple
destinations within the Peoples Republic of China (including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) and surrounding countries.
The airline will be based in Tianjin, China with registered capital of 400 million RMB (US$63 million). It will be
established pending the receipt of required governmental approvals and plans to commence flight operations in
mid-2016. We expect to contribute $16 million to the joint venture over the next six months. We plan to offer the new
airline aircraft leases to build its fleet.
Liquidity
The Company has a Senior Credit Agreement with a consortium of banks that includes an unsubordinated term
loan of $101.3 million and a revolving credit facility from which the Company has drawn $180.0 million, net of
repayments, as of December 31, 2015. On May 8, 2015, the Company executed the fifth amendment to the Senior
Credit Agreement (the "Fifth Credit Amendment"). The Fifth Credit Amendment increased the capacity of the revolving
credit facility by $50.0 million to $325.0 million, increased the permitted additional indebtedness by $50.0 million to
$150.0 million, and retained the accordion feature whereby the Company can draw up to an additional $50.0 million
subject to the lenders' consent. The Senior Credit Agreement is collateralized by the Company's fleet of Boeing 767
and 757 aircraft that are not collateralized under aircraft loans. Under the amended terms of the Senior Credit Agreement,
the Company is required to maintain collateral coverage equal to 150% of the outstanding balances of the term loan
and the maximum capacity of the revolving credit facility or 175% of the outstanding balance of the term loan and the
total funded revolving credit facility, whichever is less. The minimum collateral coverage which must be maintained
is 50% of the outstanding balance of the term loan plus the revolving credit facility commitment of $325 million. From
May 5, 2016, and each year thereafter through May 6, 2019, the Company may request a one year extension of the
final maturity date, subject to the lenders' consent.
34
Under the Senior Credit Agreement, the Company is subject to covenants and warranties that are usual and
customary including, among other things, limitations on certain additional indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness,
as well as a total debt to EBITDA ratio and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The Senior Credit Agreement stipulates
events of default including unspecified events that may have a material adverse effect on the Company. If an event of
default occurs, the Company may be forced to repay, renegotiate or replace the Senior Credit Agreement.
Additional debt or lower EBITDA may result in higher interest rates. Under the Senior Credit Agreement, interest
rates are adjusted quarterly based on the prevailing LIBOR or prime rates and a ratio of the Company's outstanding
debt level to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses). At the Company's
current debt-to-EBITDA ratio, the unsubordinated term loan and the revolving credit facility both bear a variable interest
rate of 2.18%.
At December 31, 2015, the Company had $17.7 million of cash balances. The Company had $136.6 million available
under the revolving credit facility, net of outstanding letters of credit, which totaled $8.4 million. As specified under
the terms of ABX's CMI agreement with DHL, the unsecured note payable to DHL extinguished without payment at
March 31, 2015. We believe that the Company's current cash balances and forecasted cash flows provided from its
operating agreements, combined with its Senior Credit Agreement, will be sufficient to fund operations, scheduled debt
payments, required pension funding and planned capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities
(“SPEs”), which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we were not involved in any material
unconsolidated SPE transactions.
Certain of our operating leases and agreements contain indemnification obligations to the lessor or one or more
other parties that are considered usual and customary (e.g. use, tax and environmental indemnifications), the terms of
which range in duration and are often limited. Such indemnification obligations may continue after the expiration of
the respective lease or agreement. No amounts have been recognized in our financial statements for the underlying fair
value of guarantees and indemnifications.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as certain
disclosures included elsewhere in this report, are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation
of these financial statements requires us to select appropriate accounting policies and make estimates and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingencies.
In certain cases, there are alternative policies or estimation techniques which could be selected. On an ongoing basis,
we evaluate our selection of policies and the estimation techniques we use, including those related to revenue recognition,
post-retirement liabilities, bad debts, self-insurance reserves, valuation of spare parts inventory, useful lives, salvage
values and impairment of property and equipment, income taxes, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates
on historical experience, current conditions and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances. Those factors form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources, as well as for identifying and assessing our accounting treatment with
respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions
or conditions. We believe the following significant and critical accounting policies involve the more significant
judgments and estimates used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues generated from airline service agreements are typically recognized based on hours flown or the amount
of aircraft and crew resources provided during a reporting period. Certain agreements include provisions for incentive
payments based upon on-time reliability. These incentives are typically measured on a monthly basis and recorded to
revenue in the corresponding month earned. Revenues for operating expenses that are reimbursed through customer
35
agreements, including consumption of aircraft fuel, are generally recognized as the costs are incurred. Revenues from
charter service agreements are recognized on scheduled and non-scheduled flights when the specific flight has been
completed. Aircraft lease revenues are recognized as operating lease revenues on a straight-line basis over the term of
the applicable lease agreements. Revenues from the sale of aircraft parts and engines are recognized when the parts
are delivered. Revenues earned and expenses incurred in providing aircraft-related maintenance, repair or technical
services are recognized in the period in which the services are completed and delivered to the customer. Revenues
derived from sorting parcels are recognized in the reporting period in which the services are performed. Revenue is
not recognized until collectibility is reasonably assured.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We assess in the fourth quarter of each year whether the Company’s goodwill acquired in acquisitions is impaired
in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic
350-20 Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. Additional assessments may be performed on an interim basis whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are
not amortized but are assessed for impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators occur. Finite-lived
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful economic lives and are periodically reviewed for impairment.
The application of the goodwill impairment test requires significant judgment, including the determination of the
fair value of each reporting unit that has goodwill. We estimate the fair value using a market approach and an income
approach utilizing discounted cash flows applied to a market-derived rate of return. The market approach utilizes
market multiples from comparable publicly traded companies. The market multiples include revenues and EBITDA
(earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). We derive cash flow assumptions from many factors
including recent market trends, expected revenues, cost structure, aircraft maintenance schedules and long term strategic
plans for the deployment of aircraft. Key assumptions under the discounted cash flow models include projections for
the number of aircraft in service, capital expenditures, long term growth rates, operating cash flows and market-derived
discount rates.
The first step of the goodwill impairment test requires a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit to its
respective carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit is less than its fair value, no indication of impairment
exists and a second step is not performed. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit is higher than its fair value, there
is an indication that an impairment may exist and a second step is performed. In the second step, fair values are assigned
to all of the assets and liabilities of a reporting unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets, and the implied fair
value of goodwill is calculated. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill, an impairment
loss is recorded for the difference and charged to operations.
We have used the assistance of an independent business valuation firm in estimating an expected market rate of
return, and in the development of a market approach for CAM using multiples of EBITDA and revenues from comparable
publicly traded companies. Based on our analysis, as of December 31, 2015, CAM's fair value exceeded its carrying
value by more than 25%. The Company's key assumptions used for goodwill testing include uncertainties, including
the level of demand for cargo aircraft by shippers, the U.S. Military and freight forwarders and CAM's ability to lease
aircraft and the lease rates that will be realized. The demand for customer airlift is projected based on input from
customers, management's interface with customer planning personnel and aircraft utilization trends. Certain events or
changes in circumstances could negatively impact our key assumptions. Customer preferences for cargo aircraft may
be impacted by changes in aviation fuel prices. Key customers, including DHL and the U.S. Military, may decide that
they do not need as many aircraft as projected, or they may find alternatives.
Long-lived assets
Aircraft and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Factors which may cause an impairment include termination
of aircraft from a customer's network, extended operating cash flow losses from the assets and management's decisions
regarding the future use of assets. To conduct impairment testing, we group assets and liabilities at the lowest level
for which identifiable cash is largely independent of cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For assets that are to be
held and used, impairment is recognized when the estimated undiscounted cash flows associated with an asset group
is less than the carrying value. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the assets down to fair value, and
a loss is recorded as the difference between the carrying value and fair value. Fair values are determined considering
quoted market values, discounted cash flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable.
36
Depreciation
Depreciation of property and equipment is provided on a straight-line basis over the lesser of an asset’s useful life
or lease term. We periodically evaluate the estimated service lives and residual values used to depreciate our property
and equipment. The acceleration of depreciation expense or the recording of significant impairment losses could result
from changes in the estimated useful lives of our assets. We may change the estimated useful lives due to a number of
reasons, such as the existence of excess capacity in our air networks, or changes in regulations grounding or limiting
the use of aircraft.
Self-Insurance
We self-insure certain claims related to workers’ compensation, aircraft, automobile, general liability and employee
healthcare. We record a liability for reported claims and an estimate for incurred claims that have not yet been reported.
Accruals for these claims are estimated utilizing historical paid claims data and recent claims trends. Changes in claim
severity and frequency could result in actual claims being materially different than the costs provided for in our results
of operations. We maintain excess claim coverage with common insurance carriers to mitigate our exposure to large
claim losses.
Contingencies
We are involved in legal matters that have a degree of uncertainty associated with them. We continually assess the
likely outcomes of these matters and the adequacy of amounts, if any, provided for these matters. There can be no
assurance that the ultimate outcome of these matters will not differ materially from our assessment of them. There also
can be no assurance that we know all matters that may be brought against us at any point in time.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 740-10 Income Taxes. The objectives of
accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred
tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial
statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of expected future
tax consequences could materially impact the Company’s financial position or its results of operations.
The Company has significant deferred tax assets including net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL CFs”) for federal
income tax purposes which begin to expire in 2025. Based upon projections of taxable income, we determined that it
was more likely than not that the NOL CF’s will be realized prior to their expiration. Accordingly, we do not have an
allowance against these deferred tax assets at this time.
We recognize the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based
on the technical merits of the position.
Post-retirement Obligations
The Company sponsors qualified defined benefit pension plans for ABX’s flight crewmembers and other eligible
employees. The Company also sponsors non-qualified, unfunded excess plans that provide benefits to executive
management and crewmembers that are in addition to amounts permitted to be paid through our qualified plans under
provisions of the tax laws. Employees are no longer accruing benefits under any of the defined benefit pension plans.
The Company also sponsors unfunded post-retirement healthcare plans for ABX’s flight crewmembers and non-flight
crewmember employees.
The accounting and valuation for these post-retirement obligations are determined by prescribed accounting and
actuarial methods that consider a number of assumptions and estimates. The selection of appropriate assumptions and
estimates is significant due to the long time period over which benefits will be accrued and paid. The long term nature
of these benefit payouts increases the sensitivity of certain estimates on our post-retirement costs. In actuarially valuing
our pension obligations and determining related expense amounts, key assumptions include discount rates, expected
long term investment returns, retirement ages and mortality. Actual results and future changes in these assumptions
could result in future costs that are materially different than those recorded in our annual results of operations.
Our actuarial valuation includes an assumed long term rate of return on pension plan assets of 6.25%. Our assumed
rate of return is based on a targeted long term investment allocation of 30% equity securities, 65% fixed income securities
37
and 5% real estate. The actual asset allocation at December 31, 2015 was 28% equities, 67% fixed income, 4% real
estate and 1% cash. The pension trust includes $58.4 million of investments (9% of the plans' assets) whose fair values
have been estimated in the absence of readily determinable fair values. Such investments include private equity, hedge
fund investments and real estate funds. Management’s estimates are based on information provided by the fund managers
or general partners of those funds.
In evaluating our assumptions regarding expected long term investment returns on plan assets, we consider a
number of factors, including our historical plan returns in connection with our asset allocation policies, assistance from
investment consultants hired to provide oversight over our actively managed investment portfolio, and long term
inflation assumptions. The selection of the expected return rate materially affects our pension costs. Our expected long
term rate of return was 6.25% after analyzing expected returns on investment vehicles and considering our long term
asset allocation expectations. Fluctuations in long-term interest rates can have an impact on the actual rate of return.
If we were to lower our long term rate of return assumption by a hypothetical 100 basis points, expense in 2015 would
be increased by approximately $6.6 million. We use a market value of assets as of the measurement date for determining
pension expense.
In selecting the interest rate to discount estimated future benefit payments that have been earned to date to their
net present value (defined as the projected benefit obligation), we match the plan’s benefit payment streams to high-
quality bonds of similar maturities. The selection of the discount rate not only affects the reported funded status
information as of December 31 (as shown in Note H to the accompanying consolidated financial statements), but also
affects the succeeding year’s pension and post-retirement healthcare expense. The discount rates selected for
December 31, 2015, based on the method described above, were 4.70% for crewmembers and 4.75% for non-
crewmembers. If we were to lower our discount rates by a hypothetical 50 basis points, pension expense in 2015 would
be increased by approximately $6.1 million.
Our mortality assumptions at December 31, 2015, reflect the most recent projections released by the Actuaries
Retirement Plans Experience Committee, a committee within the Society of Actuaries, a professional association in
North America. The assumed future increase in salaries and wages is not a significant estimate in determining pension
costs because each defined benefit pension plan was frozen during 2009 with respect to additional benefit accruals.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the aforementioned assumptions on our pension expense, pension
obligation and accumulated other comprehensive income (in thousands):
Change in assumption
100 basis point decrease in rate of return
50 basis point decrease in discount rate
Aggregate effect of all the above changes
Discontinued Operations
Effect of change
December 31, 2015
2015
Pension
expense
Pension
obligation
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (pre-tax)
$
6,569
$
— $
6,137
12,706
(50,212)
(50,212)
—
50,212
50,212
In accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 205-20 Presentation of Financial Statements, a business
component whose operations are discontinued is reported as discontinued operations if the cash flows of the component
have been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company and represents a strategic shift that had a major
impact on the Company. The results of discontinued operations are aggregated and presented separately in the
consolidated statement of operations. FASB ASC Topic 205-20 requires the reclassification of amounts presented for
prior years to reflect their classification as discontinued operations.
38
New Accounting Pronouncements
For information regarding recently issued accounting pronouncements and the expected impact on our annual
statements, see Note A "SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION AND SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES" in the accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item
8 of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk for changes in interest rates and changes in the price of jet fuel. The risk
associated with jet fuel, however, is largely mitigated by reimbursement through the agreements with our customers.
The Company's Senior Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain derivative instruments for fluctuating
interest rates, for at least fifty percent of the outstanding balance of the unsubordinated term loan. Accordingly, in July
2011, the Company entered into an interest rate swap instrument. Additionally, the Company entered into another
interest rate swap in June 2013. As a result, future fluctuations in LIBOR interest rates will result in the recording of
unrealized gains and losses on interest rate derivatives held by the Company. The notional values were $50.6 million
as of December 31, 2015. See Note J in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our
accounting treatment for these hedging transactions.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company has $36.9 million of fixed interest rate debt and $281.3 million of variable
interest rate debt outstanding. Variable interest rate debt exposes us to differences in future cash flows resulting from
changes in market interest rates. Variable interest rate risk can be quantified by estimating the change in annual cash
flows resulting from a hypothetical 20% increase in interest rates. A hypothetical 20% increase or decrease in interest
rates would have resulted in a change in interest expense of approximately $1.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2015.
The debt issued at fixed interest rates is exposed to fluctuations in fair value resulting from changes in market
interest rates. Fixed interest rate risk can be quantified by estimating the increase in fair value of our long term debt
through a hypothetical 20% increase in interest rates. As of December 31, 2015, a 20% increase in interest rates would
have decreased the fair value of our fixed interest rate debt by approximately $0.2 million.
The Company is exposed to concentration of credit risk primarily through cash deposits, cash equivalents, marketable
securities and derivatives. As part of our risk management process, we monitor and evaluate the credit standing of the
financial institutions with which we do business. The financial institutions with which we do business are generally
highly rated. The Company is exposed to counterparty risk, which is the loss we could incur if a counterparty to a
derivative contract defaulted.
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans and post-retirement healthcare plans for certain eligible
employees. The Company's related pension expense, plans' funded status, and funding requirements are sensitive to
changes in interest rates. The funded status of the plans and the annual pension expense is recalculated at the beginning
of each calendar year using the fair value of plan assets. market-based interest rates at that point in time, as well as
assumptions for asset returns and other actuarial assumptions. Higher interest rates could result in a lower fair value
of plan assets and increased pension expense in the following years. At December 31, 2015, ABX's defined benefit
pension plans had total investment assets of $672.2 million under investment management. See Note H in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion of these assets.
39
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
40
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
Wilmington, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Air Transport Services Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2015. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Table of Contents at Item 15a (2).
These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of the Company as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United State of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.
As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s two principal customers account
for a substantial portion of the Company’s revenue. The Company’s financial security is dependent on its ongoing
relationship with its principal customers existing as of December 31, 2015.
We have also audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 based on the criteria established
in Internal Controls - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 14, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
March 14, 2016
41
AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $415 in 2015 and $812 in 2014
Inventory
Prepaid supplies and other
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
Property and equipment, net
Other assets
Goodwill and acquired intangibles
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits
Accrued expenses
Current portion of debt obligations
Unearned revenue
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
Long term debt
Post-retirement obligations
Other liabilities
Deferred income taxes
TOTAL LIABILITIES
Commitments and contingencies (Note G)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
December 31, December 31,
2015
2014
$
17,697
57,986
12,963
12,660
101,306
875,401
26,827
38,729
$ 1,042,263
$
30,560
43,513
10,665
12,613
97,351
847,268
28,230
39,010
$ 1,011,859
$
$
44,417
27,454
8,107
33,865
12,963
126,806
284,335
108,194
61,913
96,858
678,106
40,608
25,633
8,201
24,344
12,914
111,700
319,750
92,050
57,647
83,223
664,370
Preferred stock, 20,000,000 shares authorized, including 75,000 Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 75,000,000 shares authorized;
64,077,140 and 64,854,950 shares issued and outstanding in 2015 and 2014,
respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated deficit
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
—
—
641
518,259
(55,731)
(99,012)
364,157
$ 1,042,263
649
526,669
(96,953)
(82,876)
347,489
$ 1,011,859
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
REVENUES
OPERATING EXPENSES
Salaries, wages and benefits
Depreciation and amortization
Maintenance, materials and repairs
Fuel
Travel
Contracted ground and aviation services
Rent
Landing and ramp
Insurance
Pension settlement
Impairment of goodwill
Other operating expenses
OPERATING INCOME
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest income
Net gain on derivative instruments
Interest expense
EARNINGS (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME
TAXES
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
EARNINGS (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
EARNINGS (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAXES
NET EARNINGS (LOSS)
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
TOTAL BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
TOTAL DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
Basic
Diluted
$
$
$
$
$
$
Year Ended December 31
2014
589,592
2015
619,264
$
$
2013
580,023
181,785
125,443
96,044
52,615
18,007
18,983
11,677
9,727
3,645
—
—
28,548
546,474
72,790
85
920
(11,232)
(10,227)
62,563
(23,408)
39,155
2,067
166,526
108,254
91,528
53,521
17,662
13,245
26,650
10,305
5,304
6,700
—
25,372
525,067
64,525
92
1,096
(13,937)
(12,749)
51,776
(19,702)
32,074
(2,214)
175,383
91,749
97,053
49,376
18,693
12,953
27,468
11,204
6,216
—
52,585
24,158
566,838
13,185
74
631
(14,249)
(13,544)
(359)
(19,266)
(19,625)
(3)
41,222
$
29,860
$
(19,628)
0.61
0.03
0.64
0.60
0.03
0.63
$
$
$
$
0.50
(0.04)
0.46
0.49
(0.03)
0.46
$
$
$
$
(0.31)
—
(0.31)
(0.31)
—
(0.31)
64,242
65,127
64,253
65,211
63,992
63,992
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
Years Ended December 31
2014
2013
2015
NET EARNINGS (LOSS)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
Defined Benefit Pension
Defined Benefit Post-Retirement
Gains and Losses on Derivatives
Foreign Currency Translation
$
41,222
$
29,860
$
(19,628)
(16,111)
315
(4)
(336)
(50,119)
(1,875)
(5)
(1,059)
90,530
(3,032)
(29)
—
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax
$
25,086
$
(23,198) $
67,841
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Years Ended December 31
2014
2013
2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Impairment of goodwill and acquired intangibles
Depreciation and amortization
Pension and post-retirement
Deferred income taxes
Amortization of stock-based compensation
Amortization of DHL promissory note
Net gain on derivative instruments
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
Inventory and prepaid supplies
Accounts payable
Unearned revenue
Accrued expenses, salaries, wages, benefits and other liabilities
Pension and post-retirement assets
Other
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures
Proceeds from property and equipment
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliate
Other proceeds
NET CASH (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Principal payments on long term obligations
Proceeds from borrowings
Purchase of common stock
Funding for hangar construction
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized
Federal alternative minimum and state income taxes paid
SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INFORMATION:
Debt extinguished
Accrued capital expenditures
$
39,155
2,067
$
32,074
(2,214)
$ (19,625)
(3)
—
125,443
6,920
23,691
2,454
(1,550)
(920)
(14,410)
(3,896)
4,424
(1,116)
8,375
(16,098)
(840)
173,699
—
108,254
8,492
17,757
2,924
(6,200)
(1,096)
9,582
(4,164)
(803)
1,148
344
(14,662)
(2,651)
148,785
52,585
91,749
7,061
18,772
2,732
(6,200)
(631)
(4,994)
(900)
2,012
(6,205)
(112)
(38,352)
(3,478)
94,411
(158,714)
6,841
—
—
(151,873)
(112,184)
3,602
(15,000)
—
(123,582)
(112,712)
1,521
—
6,803
(104,388)
(69,344)
45,000
(10,345)
—
(34,689)
(12,863)
30,560
17,697
10,748
870
1,550
7,033
$
$
$
$
$
(79,221)
45,000
—
7,879
(26,342)
(1,139)
31,699
30,560
13,576
604
6,200
7,648
(53,766)
80,000
—
—
26,234
16,257
15,442
31,699
13,752
1,313
6,200
1,055
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
Common Stock
Number
Amount
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
64,130,056
$
641
$ 523,087
$
(107,185) $
(117,287) $ 299,256
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2013
Stock-based compensation plans
Grant of restricted stock
Issuance of common shares, net of
withholdings
Forfeited restricted stock
Tax benefit from common stock
compensation
Amortization of stock awards and
restricted stock
258,800
238,049
(8,600)
3
2
—
(3)
(1,050)
—
187
2,732
Total comprehensive income (loss)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2013 64,618,305
Stock-based compensation plans
$
646
$ 524,953
$
(19,628)
(126,813) $
Grant of restricted stock
Issuance of common shares, net of
withholdings
Forfeited restricted stock
Tax benefit from common stock
compensation
Amortization of stock awards and
restricted stock
196,000
49,545
(8,900)
2
1
—
(2)
(939)
—
(267)
2,924
Total comprehensive income (loss)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2014 64,854,950
Stock-based compensation plans
$
649
$ 526,669
$
Grant of restricted stock
Issuance of common shares, net of
withholdings
Forfeited restricted stock
Purchase of common stock
Tax benefit from common stock
compensation
Amortization of stock awards and
restricted stock
170,800
137,457
(6,900)
(1,079,167)
2
1
—
(11)
(2)
(1,311)
—
(10,334)
783
2,454
Total comprehensive income (loss)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2015 64,077,140
$
641
$ 518,259
$
—
(1,048)
—
187
2,732
67,841
87,469
(29,818) $ 368,968
—
(938)
—
(267)
29,860
(96,953) $
2,924
(53,058)
(23,198)
(82,876) $ 347,489
—
(1,310)
—
(10,345)
783
41,222
(55,731) $
2,454
(16,136)
25,086
(99,012) $ 364,157
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A—SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION AND SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
Air Transport Services Group, Inc. is a holding company whose principal subsidiaries include an aircraft leasing
company and two independently certificated airlines. The Company provides airline operations, aircraft leases, aircraft
maintenance and other support services primarily to the cargo transportation and package delivery industries. Through
the Company's subsidiaries, it offers a range of complementary services to delivery companies, freight forwarders,
airlines and government customers.
The Company's leasing subsidiary, Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. (“CAM”), leases aircraft to each of the
Company's airlines as well as to non-affiliated airlines and other lessees. The airlines, ABX Air, Inc. (“ABX”) and Air
Transport International, Inc. (“ATI”), each have the authority, through their separate U.S. Department of Transportation
("DOT") and Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") certificates, to transport cargo worldwide. ATI provides
passenger transportation, primarily to the U.S. Military, using "combi" aircraft, which are certified to carry passengers
as well as cargo on the main deck.
The Company serves a base of concentrated customers who typically have a diverse line of international cargo
traffic. The Company provides aircraft and airline operations to its customers, typically under contracts providing for
a combination of aircraft, crews, maintenance and insurance ("ACMI") services. In addition to its airline operations
and aircraft leasing services, the Company sells aircraft parts, provides aircraft and equipment maintenance services,
and operates mail and package sorting facilities for the U.S. Postal Service (“USPS”).
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Investments in an affiliate in which the Company has significant influence but does
not exercise control are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Using the equity method, the Company’s
share of a nonconsolidated affiliate's income or loss is recognized in the consolidated statement of earnings and
cumulative post-acquisition changes in the investment are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment.
Inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated. The financial statements of the Company are prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP").
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Estimates and assumptions are used
to record allowances for uncollectible amounts, self-insurance reserves, spare parts inventory, depreciation and
impairments of property, equipment, goodwill and intangibles, post-retirement obligations, income taxes, contingencies
and litigation. Changes in estimates and assumptions may have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company classifies short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time
of purchase as cash and cash equivalents. These investments, consisting of money market funds, are recorded at cost,
which approximates fair value. Substantially all deposits of the Company’s cash are held in accounts that exceed
federally insured limits. The Company deposits cash in common financial institutions which management believes are
financially sound.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
The Company's accounts receivable is primarily due from its significant customers (see Note B), other airlines, the
USPS, delivery companies and freight forwarders. The Company performs a quarterly evaluation of the accounts
47
receivable and the allowance for uncollectible accounts by reviewing specific customers' recent payment history, growth
prospects, financial condition and other factors that may impact a customer's ability to pay. The Company establishes
an allowance for uncollectible accounts for probable losses due to a customer's potential inability or unwillingness to
make contractual payments. Account balances are written off against the allowance when the Company ceases collection
efforts.
Inventory
The Company’s inventory is comprised primarily of expendable aircraft parts and supplies used for aircraft
maintenance. Inventory is generally charged to expense when issued for use on a Company aircraft. The Company
values its inventory of aircraft parts and supplies at weighted-average cost and maintains a related obsolescence reserve.
The Company records an obsolescence reserve on a base stock of inventory for each fleet type. The amortization of
base stock for the obsolescence reserve corresponds to the expected life of each fleet type. Additionally, the Company
monitors the usage rates of inventory parts and segregates parts that are technologically outdated or no longer used in
its fleet types. Slow moving and segregated items are actively marketed and written down to their estimated net
realizable values based on market conditions.
Management analyzes the inventory reserve for reasonableness at the end of each quarter. That analysis includes
consideration of the expected fleet life, amounts expected to be on hand at the end of a fleet life, and recent events and
conditions that may impact the usability or value of inventory. Events or conditions that may impact the expected life,
usability or net realizable value of inventory include additional aircraft maintenance directives from the FAA, changes
in DOT regulations, new environmental laws and technological advances.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company assesses, during the fourth quarter of each year, the carrying value of goodwill. The first step of
the assessment is the estimation of fair value of each reporting unit, which is compared to the carrying value. If step
one indicates that impairment potentially exists, a second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment, if
any. Goodwill impairment exists when the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value. The Company
also conducts impairment assessments of goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and finite-lived intangible assets
whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate an impairment may have occurred. Finite-lived intangible assets
are amortized over their estimated useful economic lives.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment held for use is stated at cost, net of any impairment recorded. The cost and accumulated
depreciation of disposed property and equipment are removed from the accounts with any related gain or loss reflected
in earnings from operations.
Depreciation of property and equipment is provided on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the asset’s useful life
or lease term. Depreciable lives are summarized as follows:
Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft and flight equipment
Ground equipment
Leasehold improvements, facilities and office equipment
10 to 18 years
3 to 10 years
3 to 25 years
The Company periodically evaluates the useful lives, salvage values and fair values of property and equipment.
Acceleration of depreciation expense or the recording of significant impairment losses could result from changes in
the estimated useful lives of assets due to a number of reasons, such as excess aircraft capacity or changes in regulations
governing the use of aircraft.
Aircraft and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying value of
the assets may not be recoverable. To conduct impairment testing, the Company groups assets and liabilities at the
lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For
assets that are to be held and used, impairment is recognized when the estimated undiscounted cash flows associated
with the asset group is less than the carrying value. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the assets
down to fair value, and a loss is recorded as the difference between the carrying value and fair value. Fair values are
48
determined considering quoted market values, discounted cash flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable.
For assets held for sale, impairment is recognized when the fair value less the cost to sell the asset is less than the
carrying value.
The Company’s accounting policy for major airframe and engine maintenance varies by subsidiary and aircraft
type. The costs for ABX's Boeing 767-200 airframe maintenance, which is the majority of the Company's aircraft fleet,
are expensed as they are incurred. The costs of major airframe maintenance for the Company's other aircraft are
capitalized and amortized over the useful life of the overhaul. Most of the Company's General Electric CF6 engines
that power the Boeing 767-200 aircraft are maintained under “power by the hour” agreements with an engine
maintenance provider. Under the power by the hour agreements, the engines are maintained by the service provider
for a fixed fee per flight hour; accordingly, the cost of engine maintenance is generally expensed as flight hours occur.
Maintenance for the airlines’ other aircraft engines, including those on the Boeing 767-300 and Boeing 757 aircraft,
are typically contracted to service providers on a time and material basis and the costs of those engine overhauls are
capitalized and amortized over the useful life of the overhaul.
In the event the Company leases aircraft from external lessors, the Company may be required to make periodic
payments to the lessor under certain aircraft leases for future maintenance events such as engine overhauls and major
airframe maintenance. Such payments are recorded as deposits until drawn for qualifying maintenance costs. The
maintenance costs are expensed or capitalized in accordance with the airline's accounting policy for major airframe
and engine maintenance. The Company evaluates at the balance sheet date, whether it is probable that an amount on
deposit will be returned by the lessor to reimburse the costs of the maintenance activities. When an amount on deposit
is less than probable of being returned, it is recognized as additional maintenance expense.
Capitalized Interest
Interest costs incurred while aircraft are being modified are capitalized as an additional cost of the aircraft until the
date the asset is placed in service. Capitalized interest was $0.2 million, $0.1 million and $1.1 million for the years
ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Discontinued Operations
A business component whose operations are discontinued is reported as discontinued operations if the cash flows
of the component have been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company and represents a strategic shift
that had a major impact on the Company. The results of discontinued operations are aggregated and presented separately
in the consolidated statements of operations.
Self-Insurance
The Company is self-insured for certain workers’ compensation, employee healthcare, automobile, aircraft, and
general liability claims. The Company maintains excess claim coverage with common insurance carriers to mitigate
its exposure to large claim losses. The Company records a liability for reported claims and an estimate for incurred
claims that have not yet been reported. Accruals for these claims are estimated utilizing historical paid claims data and
recent claims trends. Other liabilities included $23.3 million and $25.8 million at December 31, 2015 and December 31,
2014, respectively, for self-insured reserves. Changes in claim severity and frequency could result in actual claims
being materially different than the costs accrued.
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits
The funded status of the Company's defined benefits pension or post-retirement health care plan is the difference
between the fair value of plan assets and the accumulated benefit obligations to plan participants. The over funded or
underfunded status of a plan is reflected in the consolidated balance sheet as an asset for over funded plans, or as a
liability for underfunded plans.
The funded status is ordinarily remeasured annually at year end using the fair value of plans assets, market based
discount rates and actuarial assumptions. Changes in the funded status of the plans as a result of remeasuring plan
assets and benefit obligations, are recorded to accumulated comprehensive loss and amortized into operating expense
using a corridor approach. The Company's corridor approach amortizes variances in plan assets and benefit obligations
49
that are a result of the previous measurement assumptions into earnings when the net deferred variances exceed 10%
of the greater of the market value of plan assets or the benefit obligation at the beginning of the year. The amount in
excess of the corridor is amortized over the average remaining service period to retirement date of active plan participants.
Costs adjustments for plan amendments are also deferred and amortized over the expected working life or the life
expectancy of plan participants.
Security and Maintenance Deposits
The Company's customer leases typically obligate the lessee to maintain the Company's aircraft in compliance with
regulatory standards for flight and aircraft maintenance. The Company may require an aircraft lessee to pay a security
deposit or provide a letter of credit until the expiration of the lease. Additionally, the Company's leases may require a
lessee to make monthly payments toward future expenditures for scheduled heavy maintenance events. The Company
records security and maintenance deposits in other liabilities. If a lease requires monthly maintenance payments, the
Company is typically required to reimburse the lessee for costs they incur for scheduled heavy maintenance events
after completion of the work and receipt of qualifying documentation. Reimbursements to the lessee are recorded
against the previously paid maintenance deposits.
Income Taxes
Income taxes have been computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred income taxes are
provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets
and liabilities. Deferred taxes are measured using provisions of currently enacted tax laws. A valuation allowance
against net deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that such assets will not be fully realized. Tax
credits are accounted for as a reduction of income taxes in the year in which the credit originates.
The Company recognizes the benefit of a tax position taken on a tax return, if that position is more likely than not
of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. An uncertain income tax position is not
recognized if it has a less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. The Company recognizes interest and penalties
accrued related to uncertain tax positions in operating expense.
In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (ASU 2015-17), which simplifies the presentation of deferred
income taxes by classifying all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial
position. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within
those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. The Company elected to early adopt
ASU 2015-17 as of December 31, 2015, as permitted by the FASB, and has retrospectively applied the standard to all
periods presented in the consolidated balance sheets. The adoption of ASU 2015-17 resulted in a $19.8 million and
$14.0 million reclassification of the Company's deferred tax assets from a current asset to a noncurrent liability in the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 respectively.
Purchase of Common Stock
The Company's Board of Directors has authorized management to repurchase outstanding common stock of the
Company from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The authorization does not
require the Company to repurchase a specific number of shares and the Company may terminate the repurchase program
at any time. Upon the retirement of common stock repurchased, the excess purchase price over the par value for retired
shares of common stock is recorded to additional paid-in-capital.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net earnings and other comprehensive income or loss. Other comprehensive
income or loss results from certain changes in the Company’s liabilities for pension and other post retirement benefits,
gains and losses associated with interest rate hedging instruments and fluctuations in currency exchange rates related
to the foreign affiliate.
50
Fair Value Information
Assets or liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value are reported using the exchange price that would
be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for
the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC Topic
820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes three levels of input that may be used to measure fair
value:
•
•
•
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical,
unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities;
quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to
the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include items where the determination
of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
Revenue Recognition
Aircraft lease revenues are recognized as operating lease revenues on a straight-line basis over the term of the
applicable lease agreements. Revenues generated from airline service agreements are typically recognized based on
hours flown or the amount of aircraft and crew resources provided during a reporting period. Certain agreements
include provisions for incentive payments based upon on-time reliability. These incentives are typically measured on
a monthly basis and recorded to revenue in the corresponding month earned. Revenues for operating expenses that are
reimbursed through airline service agreements, including consumption of aircraft fuel, are generally recognized as the
costs are incurred. Revenues from charter service agreements are recognized on scheduled and non-scheduled flights
when the specific flight has been completed. Revenues from the sale of aircraft parts and engines are recognized when
the parts are delivered. Revenues earned and expenses incurred in providing aircraft-related maintenance, repair or
technical services are recognized in the period in which the services are completed and delivered to the customer.
Revenues derived from sorting parcels are recognized in the reporting period in which the services are performed.
Revenue is not recognized until collectibility is reasonably assured.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU")
No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 is a
comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of
goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those
goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty
of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments
and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with earlier adoption permitted for reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and
the effect the standard is expected to have on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows and related disclosures.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the
Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" ("ASU 2015-03"). ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs related to a
recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of that debt
liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not
affected by ASU 2015-03. The amendments in ASU 2015-03 are effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not
expect the impact of adopting ASU 2015-03 to be material to the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures.
In July 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset
Value per Share, which removes the requirement for companies to disclose the fair value hierarchy for assets calculated
51
at net asset value per share in common commingled trusts, for example. This standard is effective January 1, 2016 for
the Company. This amendment must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented.
In July 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory" ("ASU
2015-11"). ASU 2015-11 more closely aligns the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of inventory
in International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). The amendment in ASU 2015-11 is for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendment
should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting
period. The Company does not expect the impact of adopting ASU 2015-11 to be material to the Company's financial
statements and related disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" which will require the recognition of right
to-use-assets and lease liabilities for leases previously classified as operating leases by lessees. The standard will take
effect for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim reporting periods. Early
application will be permitted for all entities upon issuance of the final standard. In addition, the FASB has decided to
require a lessee to apply a modified retrospective transition approach for capital and operating leases existing at, or
entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements (the date of
initial application). The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that
expired before the date of initial application. The FASB decided to not permit a full retrospective transition approach.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the standard on its financial statements and disclosures.
NOTE B—SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
DHL
The Company's largest customer is DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. and its affiliates ("DHL"). The Company
has had long term contracts with DHL since August 2003. Revenues from continuing operations performed for DHL
were approximately 46%, 55% and 54% of the Company's consolidated revenues from continuing operations for the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s balance sheets include accounts
receivable with DHL of $9.8 million and $12.2 million as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
The Company leases Boeing 767 aircraft to DHL under both long-term and short-term lease agreements. Under
a separate crew, maintenance and insurance (“CMI”) agreement, the Company operates Boeing 767 aircraft that DHL
leases from the Company and aircraft that DHL owns. Pricing for services provided through the CMI agreement is
based on pre-defined fees, scaled for the number of aircraft operated and the number of flight crews provided to DHL
for its U.S. network. The Company provides DHL with scheduled maintenance services for aircraft that DHL leases
or owns. The Company also provides Boeing 767 and Boeing 757 air cargo transportation services for DHL through
additional ACMI agreements in which the Company provides the aircraft, crews, maintenance and insurance under a
single contract. Revenues generated from the ACMI agreements are typically based on hours flown. The Company
also provides ground equipment, such as power units, air starts and related maintenance services to DHL under separate
agreements.
U.S. Military
A substantial portion of the Company's revenues are also derived from the U.S. Military. The U.S. Military awards
flights to U.S. certificated airlines through annual contracts and through temporary "expansion" routes. Revenues from
services performed for the U.S. Military were approximately 16%, 16% and 17% of the Company's total revenues from
continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company's balance
sheets included accounts receivable with the U.S. Military of $9.7 million and $6.0 million as of December 31, 2015
and December 31, 2014, respectively.
NOTE C—GOODWILL, ACQUIRED INTANGIBLES AND EQUITY INVESTMENTS
As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the goodwill amounts were retested for impairment. To perform the
first step of the goodwill impairment test, the Company determined the fair values of ATI and CAM separately using
industry market multiples and discounted cash flows utilizing a market-derived rate of return (level 3 fair value inputs).
The goodwill included in the CAM segment was not impaired. The ATI goodwill, included in ACMI Services segment,
52
was found to be impaired as of December 31, 2013. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $52.6 million in
2013 to write-off the ATI goodwill. As a result of past events and market changes, the Company did not expect ATI to
generate the forecasted net cash flows from ATI's Boeing 767 operations as previously expected. In December 2013
and in January 2014, the Company received notification from DHL that it would cease using ATI's Boeing 767 services
in the Middle East by the end of February 2014. Further, as a result of persistent stagnant growth conditions at the end
of 2013 and excess airlift capacity, including the projections published by the U.S. Military that reflected continued
reductions in their demand for cargo (non combi) airlift, the Company allocated fewer Boeing 767 aircraft to ATI than
previously expected. The Company instead deployed more Boeing 767 aircraft with other airlines since 2014.
The carrying amounts of goodwill are as follows (in thousands):
Carrying value as of December 31, 2013
Impairment
Carrying value as of December 31, 2014
Impairment
Carrying value as of December 31, 2015
CAM
34,395
—
34,395
—
34,395
$
$
$
The Company's intangible assets relate to the ACMI Services segment and are as follows (in thousands):
Carrying value as of December 31, 2013
Amortization
Carrying value as of December 31, 2014
Amortization
Carrying value as of December 31, 2015
Customer
Airline
Relationships
Certificates
Total
$
$
$
1,896
(281)
1,615
(281)
1,334
$
$
$
3,000
—
3,000
—
3,000
$
$
$
4,896
(281)
4,615
(281)
4,334
The customer relationship intangible amortizes through 2020. The Company recorded amortization expense for
the customer relationship intangible asset of $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million for the years ending December
31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The airline certificates have an indefinite life and therefore are not amortized.
In January 2014, the Company acquired a 25 percent equity interest in West Atlantic AB of Gothenburg, Sweden
("West"). West, through its two airlines, Atlantic Airlines Ltd. and West Air Sweden AB, operates a fleet of approximately
45 aircraft. West operates its aircraft on behalf of European regional mail carriers and express logistics providers. The
airlines operate a combined fleet of British Aerospace ATPs, Bombardier CRJ-200-PFs, and Boeing 767 and 737 aircraft.
West leases three Boeing 767 aircraft from the Company.
The Company has significant influence, but does not exercise control, over West. Accordingly, the investment in
West is accounted for using the equity method of accounting and was initially recognized at cost. The Company’s
carrying value of West was $13.1 million and $13.8 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, including
$5.5 million of excess purchase price over the Company's proportional fair value of West's net assets in January of
2014. The carrying value is reflected in “Other Assets” in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE D—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company’s money market funds and interest rate swaps are reported on the Company’s consolidated balance
sheets at fair values based on market values from identical or comparable transactions. The fair value of the Company’s
money market funds and interest rate swaps are based on observable inputs (Level 2) from comparable market
transactions. The use of significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) was not necessary in determining the fair value of
the Company’s financial assets and liabilities.
53
The following table reflects assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2015
Fair Value Measurement Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets
Cash equivalents—money market
Total Assets
Liabilities
Interest rate swap
Total Liabilities
As of December 31, 2014
Assets
Cash equivalents—money market
Total Assets
Liabilities
Interest rate swap
Total Liabilities
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
— $
— $
— $
— $
8,711
8,711
$
$
(499) $
(499) $
— $
— $
— $
— $
8,711
8,711
(499)
(499)
Fair Value Measurement Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
20
20
$
$
— $
— $
2,306
2,306
$
$
(1,419) $
(1,419) $
— $
— $
— $
— $
2,326
2,326
(1,419)
(1,419)
As a result of lower market interest rates compared to the stated interest rates of the Company’s fixed and variable
rate debt obligations, the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations, based on Level 2 observable inputs, was
approximately $1.3 million more than the carrying value, which was $318.2 million at December 31, 2015. As of
December 31, 2014, the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations was approximately $2.5 million more than the
carrying value, which was $344.1 million. The non-financial assets, including goodwill, intangible assets and property
and equipment are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
NOTE E—PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The Company's property and equipment consists primarily of cargo aircraft, aircraft engines and other flight
equipment. Property and equipment, to be held and used, is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Flight equipment
Ground equipment
Leasehold improvements, facilities and office equipment
Aircraft modifications and projects in progress
Accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment, net
$
December 31,
2015
1,372,099
36,593
25,327
52,717
1,486,736
(611,335)
875,401
$
$
December 31,
2014
1,285,966
33,677
25,180
18,612
1,363,435
(516,167)
847,268
$
CAM owned aircraft with a carrying value of $369.2 million and $289.5 million that were under leases to external
customers as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Minimum future lease payments for aircraft and equipment
leased to external customers as of December 31, 2015 is scheduled to be $76.6 million, $70.5 million, $65.8 million,
$33.5 million and $15.3 million for each of the next five years ending December 31, 2020.
The carrying value of Boeing 727 and DC-8 freighter aircraft and engines available for sale totaled $0.3 million
and $0.7 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
54
NOTE F—DEBT OBLIGATIONS
Long term obligations consisted of the following (in thousands):
Unsubordinated term loan
Revolving credit facility
Aircraft loans
Promissory note due to DHL, unsecured
Total long term obligations
Less: current portion
Total long term obligations, net
December 31,
December 31,
2015
2014
$
101,250
$
180,000
36,950
—
318,200
(33,865)
284,335
$
$
116,250
180,000
46,294
1,550
344,094
(24,344)
319,750
The Company executed a syndicated credit agreement ("Senior Credit Agreement") in May 2011 which includes
an unsubordinated term loan and a revolving credit facility. On May 8, 2015, the Company executed an amendment
to the Senior Credit Agreement (the "Fifth Credit Amendment"). The Fifth Credit Amendment extended the maturity
of the term loan and revolving credit facility to May 5, 2020, increased the capacity of the Revolving credit facility by
$50.0 million to $325.0 million, increased the permitted additional indebtedness by $50.0 million to $150.0 million,
and retained the accordion feature whereby the Company can draw up to an additional $50.0 million subject to the
lenders' consent. Under the amended terms of the Senior Credit Agreement, the Company is required to maintain
collateral coverage equal to 150% of the outstanding balances of the term loan and the maximum capacity of revolving
credit facility or 175% of the outstanding balance of the term loan and the total funded revolving credit facility, whichever
is less. The minimum collateral coverage which must be maintained is 50% of the outstanding balance of the term
loan plus the revolving credit facility commitment which was $325.0 million as of May 8, 2015. Each year, through
May 6, 2019, the Company may request a one year extension of the final maturity date, subject to the lenders' consent.
Under the terms of the Senior Credit Agreement, interest rates are adjusted quarterly based on the Company's
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses ("EBITDA"), its outstanding debt level and
prevailing LIBOR or prime rates. At the Company's current debt-to-EBITDA ratio, the LIBOR based financing for
the unsubordinated term loan and revolving credit facility bear a variable interest rate of 2.18% and 2.18%, respectively.
The Senior Credit Agreement provides for the issuance of letters of credit on the Company's behalf. As of December
31, 2015, the unused revolving credit facility totaled $136.6 million, net of draws of $180.0 million and outstanding
letters of credit of $8.4 million.
The aircraft loans are collateralized by six aircraft, and amortize monthly with a balloon payment of approximately
20% with maturities between 2016 and early 2018. Interest rates range from 6.74% to 7.36% per annum payable
monthly.
The scheduled annual principal payments on long term debt, as of December 31, 2015, for the next five years are
as follows (in thousands):
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021 and beyond
55
$
Principal
Payments
33,865
29,445
18,640
15,000
221,250
—
$
318,200
The promissory note payable to DHL was amortized ratably without cash payment in exchange for services provided
under the term of the CMI agreement and, thus, was completely amortized on March 31, 2015. The promissory note
beared interest at a rate of 5% per annum, and DHL reimbursed ABX the interest expense from the note.
The Senior Credit Agreement is collateralized by certain of the Company's Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft that are
not collateralized under aircraft loans. The Senior Credit Agreement contains covenants including, among other things,
limitations on certain additional indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness, as well as a total debt to EBITDA ratio and
a fixed charge coverage ratio. The Senior Credit Agreement stipulates events of default, including unspecified events
that may have material adverse effects on the Company. If an event of default occurs, the Company may be forced to
repay, renegotiate or replace the Senior Credit Agreement. The Senior Credit Agreement limits the amount of dividends
the Company can pay and the amount of common stock it can repurchase to $50.0 million during any calendar year,
provided the Company's total debt to EBITDA ratio is under 2.5 times, after giving effect to the dividend or repurchase.
NOTE G—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Commitments
The Company leases portions of the air park in Wilmington, Ohio, under lease agreements with a regional port
authority, the terms of which expire in May of 2019 and June of 2036 with options to extend the leases. The leased
facilities include corporate offices, 310,000 square feet of maintenance hangars and a 100,000 square foot component
repair shop at the air park. ABX also has the non-exclusive right to use the airport, which includes one active runway,
taxi ways and ramp space. Additionally, the Company leases certain equipment and airport facilities, office space,
maintenance facilities at locations outside of the airpark in Wilmington. The future minimum lease payments of the
Company as of December 31, 2015 are scheduled below (in thousands):
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021 and beyond
Total minimum lease payments
Customer Commitment
Facility
Leases
Other
Leases
$
7,612 $
6,115
5,350
2,639
947
12,948
394
148
99
34
—
—
$
35,611 $
675
On March 8, 2016, the Company entered into an Air Transportation Services Agreement (the “ATSA”) with Amazon
Fulfillment Services, Inc. ("AFS"), a subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”), pursuant to which the Company
will lease 20 Boeing 767 freighter aircraft to AFS, including 12 Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft for a term of five
years and eight Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft for a term of seven years. The ATSA, which has a term of five years,
also provides for the operation of those aircraft by the Company’s airline subsidiaries. The Company owns all of the
Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft and either owns or has entered into purchase agreements for the eight Boeing 767-300
aircraft that are committed to be leased and operated under the ATSA. The ATSA becomes effective April 1, 2016. In
conjunction with the execution of the ATSA, the Company and Amazon entered into agreements under which the
Company issues warrants that grant Amazon the right to purchase such number of common shares as is necessary to
bring Amazon’s ownership to 19.9% of the Company’s outstanding common shares after giving effect to the issuance
of the warrants, subject to stockholder approval.
Purchase Commitments
The Company has agreements with Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. ("IAI") for the conversion of Boeing 767
passenger aircraft into a standard freighter configuration. The conversions primarily consists of the installation of a
standard cargo door and loading system. At December 31, 2015, the Company owned two Boeing 767-300 aircraft
that were in the freighter modification process. Also, the Company had committed to the purchase of additional aircraft
56
and to induct nine more aircraft into the freighter modification process during 2016, four of which are expected to be
completed by the end of 2016. As of December 31, 2015 the Company's commitments to acquire and complete these
aircraft conversions totaled $174.6 million.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
Certain leases and agreements of the Company contain guarantees and indemnification obligations to the lessor, or
one or more other parties that are considered reasonable and customary (e.g. use, tax and environmental
indemnifications), the terms of which range in duration and are often limited. Such indemnification obligations may
continue after expiration of the respective lease or agreement.
Other
In September 2015, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement to establish an express cargo airline serving
multiple destinations within the People's Republic of China (including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan) and surrounding
countries. The airline will be based in Tianjin, China with registered capital of 400 million RMB (US$63 million). It
will be established pending the receipt of required governmental approvals and plans to commence flight operations
in mid-2016. The Company may offer the new airline aircraft leases to build its fleet. The Company expects to
contribute $16 million to the joint venture over the next six months.
In addition to the foregoing matters, the Company is also currently a party to legal proceedings, including FAA
enforcement actions, in various federal and state jurisdictions arising out of the operation of the Company's business.
The amount of alleged liability, if any, from these proceedings cannot be determined with certainty; however, the
Company believes that its ultimate liability, if any, arising from the pending legal proceedings, as well as from asserted
legal claims and known potential legal claims which are probable of assertion, taking into account established accruals
for estimated liabilities, should not be material to our financial condition or results of operations.
Employees Under Collective Bargaining Agreements
As of December 31, 2015, the flight crewmember employees of ABX and ATI were represented by the labor unions
listed below:
Airline
ABX
ATI
Labor Agreement Unit
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Air Line Pilots Association
Percentage of
the
Company’s
Employees
9.6%
5.6%
NOTE H—PENSION AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Benefit and Post-retirement Healthcare Plans
ABX sponsors a qualified defined benefit pension plan for ABX crewmembers and a qualified defined benefit
pension plan for a major portion of its other ABX employees that meet minimum eligibility requirements. ABX also
sponsors non-qualified defined benefit pension plans for certain employees. These non-qualified plans are unfunded.
Employees are no longer accruing benefits under any of the defined benefit pension plans. ABX also sponsors a post-
retirement healthcare plan for its ABX employees, which is unfunded. Benefits for covered individuals terminate upon
reaching age 65 under the post-retirement healthcare plans.
The accounting and valuation for these post-retirement obligations are determined by prescribed accounting and
actuarial methods that consider a number of assumptions and estimates. The selection of appropriate assumptions and
estimates is significant due to the long time period over which benefits will be accrued and paid. The long term nature
of these benefit payouts increases the sensitivity of certain estimates of our post-retirement costs. The assumptions
considered most sensitive in actuarially valuing ABX’s pension obligations and determining related expense amounts
are discount rates and expected long term investment returns on plan assets. Additionally, other assumptions concerning
retirement ages, mortality and employee turnover also affect the valuations. Actual results and future changes in these
assumptions could result in future costs significantly higher than those recorded in our results of operations.
57
ABX measures plan assets and benefit obligations as of December 31 of each year. Information regarding ABX’s
sponsored defined benefit pension plans and post-retirement healthcare plans follow below. The accumulated benefit
obligation reflects pension benefit obligations based on the actual earnings and service to-date of current employees.
During 2014, ABX offered vested, former employee participants of the qualified pension plan and vested employee
participants of the crewmembers qualified pension plan a one-time option to settle their pension benefit with the
Company through a single payment or a nonparticipating annuity contract. As a result, ABX settled $98.7 million of
pension obligations in December of 2014 from the pension plans assets. The settlement resulted in pre tax charges of
$6.7 million to continued operations and $5.0 million to discontinued operations for 2014 due to the reclassification
of $11.7 million of pre-tax losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Funded Status (in thousands):
Accumulated benefit obligation
Change in benefit obligation
Obligation as of January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Plan transfers
Benefits paid
Settlement payments
Actuarial (gain) loss
Obligation as of December 31
Change in plan assets
Fair value as of January 1
Actual gain on plan assets
Plan transfers
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Settlement payments
Fair value as of December 31
Funded status
Underfunded plans
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Pension Plans
$
$
$
$
2015
777,320
807,992
—
34,584
2,558
(32,696)
—
(35,118)
777,320
719,787
(23,677)
2,558
6,181
(32,696)
— $
$
672,153
2014
807,992
761,774
—
39,517
2,659
(29,961)
(98,738)
132,741
807,992
$
$
$
$
751,246
88,453
2,659
6,128
(29,961)
(98,738) $
$
719,787
Post-retirement
Healthcare Plans
2015
2014
4,999
6,163
177
192
—
(788)
—
(745)
4,999
$
$
$
— $
—
—
788
(788)
— $
— $
6,163
7,482
239
286
—
(1,623)
—
(221)
6,163
—
—
—
1,623
(1,623)
—
—
(1,346) $
(103,821) $
(1,506) $
(86,699) $
(626) $
(4,373) $
(812)
(5,351)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
58
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
ABX’s net periodic benefit costs for its defined benefit pension plans and post-retirement healthcare plans for the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, are as follows (in thousands):
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Settlements
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of net (gain) loss
Net periodic benefit cost
Pension Plans
Post-Retirement Healthcare Plan
2015
2014
2013
2015
2014
2013
$
— $
— $
— $
34,584
39,517
35,957
(44,082)
(46,111)
(45,990)
—
—
7,170
11,660
—
(2)
—
—
12,296
$
(2,328) $
5,064
$
2,263
$
$
177
192
—
—
239
286
—
—
275
264
—
—
(542)
(3,487)
(5,654)
292
119
321
419
$
(2,641) $
(4,696)
Unrecognized Net Periodic Benefit Expense
The pre-tax amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not yet been recognized as components
of net periodic benefit expense at December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
Unrecognized prior service cost
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
Pension Plans
Post-Retirement
Healthcare Plans
2015
2014
2015
2014
$
— $
— $
144,402
118,932
(153) $
449
(696)
1,486
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
$ 144,402
$ 118,932
$
296
$
790
The following table sets forth the amounts of unrecognized net actuarial loss and (gain) recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive loss that is expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit expense during 2016
(in thousands):
Amortization of actuarial loss
Prior Service Cost
Assumptions
Post-
Retirement
Healthcare
Plans
Pension
Plans
$ 13,472
$
—
160
(102)
Assumptions used in determining the funded status of ABX’s pension plans at December 31 were as follows:
Discount rate - crewmembers
Discount rate - non-crewmembers
Expected return on plan assets
2015
4.70%
4.75%
6.25%
Pension Plans
2014
4.35%
4.40%
6.25%
2013
5.25%
5.35%
6.25%
Net periodic benefit cost was based on the discount rate assumptions at the end of the previous year.
The discount rate used to determine post-retirement healthcare obligations was 3.65% for pilots and 3.35% for non-
pilots at December 31, 2015. The discount rate used to determine post-retirement healthcare obligations was 3.35%
59
for pilots and 3.30% for non-pilots at December 31, 2014. The discount rate used to determine post-retirement healthcare
obligations was 4.15% for pilots and 3.85% for non-pilots at December 31, 2013. Post-retirement healthcare plan
obligations have not been funded. The Company's retiree healthcare contributions have been fixed for each participant,
accordingly, healthcare cost trend rates do not effect the post-retirement healthcare obligations.
Plan Assets
The weighted-average asset allocations by asset category are as shown below:
Asset category
Cash
Equity securities
Fixed income securities
Real estate
Composition of Plan Assets
as of December 31
2015
2014
1%
28%
67%
4%
100%
—%
28%
68%
4%
100%
ABX uses an investment management firm to advise it in developing and executing an investment policy. The
portfolio is managed with consideration for diversification, quality and marketability. The investment policy permits
the following ranges of asset allocation: equities – 15% to 35%; fixed income securities – 60% to 80%; real estate –
0% to 5%; cash – 0% to 5%. Except for U.S. Treasuries, no more than 10% of the fixed income portfolio and no more
than 5% of the equity portfolio can be invested in securities of any single issuer.
The overall expected long term rate of return was developed using various market assumptions in conjunction with
the plans’ targeted asset allocation. The assumptions were based on historical market returns.
Cash Flows
In 2015 and 2014, the Company made contributions to its defined benefit plans of $6.2 million and $6.1 million,
respectively and $98.7 million for settlement payments in 2014. The Company estimates that its contributions in 2016
will be approximately $6.3 million for its defined benefit pension plans and $0.6 million for its post-retirement healthcare
plans.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid out
of the respective plans as follows (in thousands):
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Years 2021 to 2025
Fair Value Measurements
Pension
Benefits
Post-retirement
Healthcare
Benefits
$
34,766
$
40,373
40,064
42,234
44,237
245,721
626
629
592
584
573
2,477
The pension plan assets are valued at fair value. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used
for the investments measured at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
valuation hierarchy.
Common Trust Funds—Common trust funds are composed of shares or units in non-publicly traded funds
whereby the underlying assets in these funds (cash, cash equivalents, fixed income securities and equity securities)
60
are publicly traded on exchanges and price quotes for the assets held by these funds are readily available. Holdings
of common trust funds are classified as Level 2 investments.
Corporate Stock—This investment category consists of common and preferred stock issued by domestic and
international corporations that are regularly traded on exchanges and price quotes for these shares are readily
available. These investments are classified as Level 1 investments.
Mutual Funds—Investments in this category include shares in registered mutual funds, unit trust and
commingled funds. These funds consist of domestic equity, international equity and fixed income strategies.
Investments in this category that are publicly traded on an exchange and have a share price published at the close
of each business day are classified as Level 1 investments and holdings in the other mutual funds are classified as
Level 2 investments.
Fixed Income Investments—Securities in this category consist of U.S. Government or Agency securities, state
and local government securities, corporate fixed income securities or pooled fixed income securities. Securities
in this category that are valued utilizing published prices at the close of each business day are classified as Level
1 investments. Those investments valued by bid data prices provided by independent pricing sources are classified
as Level 2 investments.
Real Estate—The real estate investment in a commingled trust account consists of publicly traded real estate
investment trusts and collateralized mortgage backed securities as well as private market direct property
investments. The valuations for the holdings in these investments are not based on readily observable inputs and
are classified as Level 3 investments.
Hedge Funds and Private Equity—These investments are not readily tradeable and have valuations that are
not based on readily observable data inputs. The fair value of these assets is estimated based on information provided
by the fund managers or the general partners. Therefore, these assets are classified as Level 3.
The pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2015
Fair Value Measurement Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Plan assets
Common trust funds
Corporate stock
Mutual funds
Fixed income investments
Real estate
Hedge funds and private equity
Total plan assets
As of December 31, 2014
Plan assets
Common trust funds
Corporate stock
Mutual funds
Fixed income investments
Real estate
Hedge funds and private equity
Total plan assets
$
$
$
— $
4,354
$
— $
14,832
46,991
4,954
—
—
—
99,056
443,600
—
—
—
—
—
29,717
28,649
4,354
14,832
146,047
448,554
29,717
28,649
66,777
$
547,010
$
58,366
$
672,153
Fair Value Measurement Using
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
— $
4,238
$
— $
17,878
51,568
1,978
—
—
—
100,252
488,399
—
—
—
—
—
26,057
29,417
4,238
17,878
151,820
490,377
26,057
29,417
$
71,424
$
592,889
$
55,474
$
719,787
61
ABX’s pension investments include hedge funds, private equity and real estate funds whose fair values have been
estimated in the absence of readily determinable fair values. Management’s estimates are based on information provided
by the fund managers or general partners of those funds. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant Level 3 unobservable inputs (in thousands):
January 1, 2014
Unrealized gains
Purchases & settlements
December 31, 2014
Unrealized gains
Purchases & settlements
December 31, 2015
Defined Contribution Plans
Hedge Funds &
Private Equity
Real Estate
Investments
Total
$
$
$
29,339
$
19,561
$
2,376
(2,298)
29,417
1,418
(2,186)
28,649
$
$
6,496
—
26,057
$
3,660
—
29,717
$
48,900
8,872
(2,298)
55,474
5,078
(2,186)
58,366
The Company sponsors defined contribution capital accumulation plans (401k) that are funded by both voluntary
employee salary deferrals and by employer contributions. Expenses for defined contribution retirement plans were
$5.7 million, $5.4 million and $5.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
NOTE I—INCOME TAXES
At December 31, 2015, the Company had cumulative net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL CFs”) for federal
income tax purposes of approximately $78.9 million, which begin to expire in 2025 if not utilized before then. The
deferred tax asset balance includes $2.0 million net of a $0.2 million valuation allowance related to state NOL CFs,
which have remaining lives ranging from one to twenty years. These NOL CFs are attributable to excess tax deductions
related primarily to the accelerated tax depreciation of fixed assets. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
determined that, based upon projections of taxable income, it was more likely than not that the NOL CF’s will be
realized prior to their expiration, accordingly, no allowance against these deferred tax assets was recorded.
62
The significant components of the deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 are
as follows (in thousands):
Deferred tax assets:
December 31
2015
2014
Net operating loss carryforward and federal credits
$
30,981
$
Post-retirement employee benefits
Employee benefits other than post-retirement
Inventory reserve
Deferred revenue
Other
Deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Accelerated depreciation
Partnership items
State taxes
Valuation allowance against deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax (liability)
36,589
13,773
2,924
8,650
2,344
95,261
35,902
31,067
16,489
2,930
9,154
1,810
97,352
(175,572)
(9,489)
(6,830)
(229)
(192,120)
(96,859) $
(164,858)
(9,493)
(5,995)
(229)
(180,575)
(83,223)
$
The following summarizes the Company’s income tax provisions (benefits) (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31
2015
2014
2013
$
524
$
338
$
—
371
21,073
—
1,440
22,513
23,408
1,178
—
345
17,411
—
1,608
19,019
$
$
19,702
$
(1,262) $
67
—
425
17,902
—
872
18,774
19,266
(2)
Current taxes:
Federal
Foreign
State
Deferred taxes:
Federal
Foreign
State
Total deferred tax expense
Total income tax expense from continuing operations
Income tax expense (benefit) from discontinued operations
$
$
63
The reconciliation of income tax from continuing operations computed at the U.S. statutory federal income tax rates
to effective income tax rates is as follows:
Statutory federal tax rate
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
Tax effect of non-deductible goodwill
Tax effect of other non-deductible expenses
Other
Effective income tax rate
Years Ended December 31
2015
2014
2013
35.0 %
1.9 %
— %
0.9 %
(0.4)%
37.4 %
35.0 %
2.5 %
— %
0.8 %
(0.2)%
38.1 %
35.0 %
(234.7)%
(5,121.2)%
(26.4)%
(19.3)%
(5,366.6)%
The reconciliation of income tax from discontinued operations computed at the U.S. statutory federal income tax
rates to effective income tax rates is as follows:
Statutory federal tax rate
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
Effective income tax rate
Years Ended December 31
2014
2015
2013
35.0%
1.3%
36.3%
(35.0)%
(1.3)%
(36.3)%
(35.0)%
(1.3)%
(36.3)%
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various international, state and local
jurisdictions. The returns may be subject to audit by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other jurisdictional
authorities. International returns consist primarily of disclosure returns where the Company is covered by the sourcing
rules of U.S. international treaties. The Company recognizes the impact of an uncertain income tax position in the
financial statements if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits
of the position. At December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company's unrecognized tax benefits were $0.0 million,
$0.0 million and $0.0 million respectively. Accrued interest and penalties on tax positions are recorded as a component
of interest expense. Interest and penalties expense was immaterial for 2015, 2014 and 2013.
The Company began to file, effective in 2008, federal tax returns under a common parent of the consolidated group
that includes ABX and all the wholly-owned subsidiaries. The returns for 2014, 2013 and 2012 related to the current
consolidated group remain open to examination. The consolidated federal tax returns prior to 2012 remain open to
federal examination only to the extent of net operating loss carryforwards carried over from or utilized in those years.
State and local returns filed for 2005 through 2014 are generally also open to examination by their respective
jurisdictions, either in full or limited to net operating losses.
64
NOTE J—DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company's Senior Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain derivative instruments for protection
from fluctuating interest rates, for at least fifty percent of the outstanding balance of term loan. As a result, the Company
entered into an interest rate swaps described in the table below. Under the swap expiring in 2016, the Company pays
a fixed rate of 2.02% and receives a floating rate that resets quarterly based on LIBOR. Under the swap expiring in
2017, the Company pays a fixed rate of 1.1825% and receives a floating rate that resets monthly based on LIBOR.
The outstanding interest rate swaps are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. The effects of future
fluctuations in LIBOR interest rates on derivatives held by the Company will result in the recording of unrealized gains
and losses into the statement of operations. The Company recorded nets gains on derivatives of $0.9 million, $1.1
million and $0.6 million for the years ending December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The liability for
outstanding derivatives is recorded in other liabilities and in accrued expenses. The table below provides information
about the Company’s interest rate swaps (in thousands):
Expiration Date
May 9, 2016
June 30, 2017
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2014
Stated
Interest
Rate
2.020%
1.183%
Notional
Amount
50,625
50,625
Market
Value
(Liability)
(247)
(252)
Notional
Amount
58,125
58,125
Market
Value
(Liability)
(1,071)
(348)
65
NOTE K—ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes the following items by components for the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Defined
Benefit Post-
Retirement
Gains and
Losses on
Derivative
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Total
Balance as of January 1, 2013
(121,602)
4,277
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
reclassifications:
Actuarial gain (loss) for retiree liabilities
129,856
474
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income:
Actuarial costs (reclassified to salaries, wages
and benefits)
Negative prior service cost (reclassified to
salaries, wages and benefits)
Hedging gain (reclassified to interest expense)
Income Tax (Expense) or Benefit
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Balance as of December 31, 2013
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
reclassifications:
Actuarial gain (loss) for retiree liabilities
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income:
Pension settlement
Actuarial costs (reclassified to salaries, wages
and benefits)
Negative prior service cost (reclassified to
salaries, wages and benefits)
Hedging gain (reclassified to interest expense)
Income Tax (Expense) or Benefit
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
reclassifications:
Actuarial gain (loss) for retiree liabilities
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income:
Actuarial costs (reclassified to salaries, wages
and benefits)
Negative prior service cost (reclassified to
salaries, wages and benefits)
Hedging gain (reclassified to interest expense)
Income Tax (Expense) or Benefit
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Balance as of December 31, 2015
12,296
419
(5,654)
—
1,729
(3,032)
1,245
220
—
—
321
(3,487)
—
1,071
(1,875)
(630)
745
—
292
(542)
—
(180)
315
(315)
—
—
(51,622)
90,530
(31,072)
(90,400)
—
11,660
(2)
—
—
28,623
(50,119)
(81,191)
(32,640)
—
7,170
—
—
9,359
(16,111)
(97,302)
66
38
—
—
—
(50)
21
(29)
9
—
—
—
—
—
(42)
37
(5)
4
—
—
—
—
(50)
46
(4)
—
— (117,287)
— 130,330
—
—
—
—
—
—
12,715
(5,654)
(50)
(49,872)
87,469
(29,818)
—
(1,629)
(90,180)
(1,629)
—
—
—
—
570
(1,059)
(1,059)
11,660
319
(3,487)
(42)
30,301
(53,058)
(82,876)
—
(517)
(31,895)
(517)
—
—
—
181
(336)
(1,395)
7,462
(542)
(50)
9,406
(16,136)
(99,012)
NOTE L—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company's Board of Directors has granted stock incentive awards to certain employees and board members
pursuant to a long term incentive plan which was approved by the Company's stockholders in May 2005. Employees
have been awarded non-vested stock units with performance conditions, non-vested stock units with market conditions
and non-vested restricted stock. The restrictions on the non-vested restricted stock awards lapse at the end of a specified
service period, which is typically approximately three years from the date of grant. Restrictions could lapse sooner
upon a business combination, death, disability or after an employee qualifies for retirement. The non-vested stock units
will be converted into a number of shares of Company stock depending on performance and market conditions at the
end of a specified service period, lasting approximately three years. The performance condition awards will be converted
into a number of shares of Company stock based on the Company's average return on invested capital during the service
period. Similarly, the market condition awards will be converted into a number of shares depending on the appreciation
of the Company's stock compared to the NASDAQ Transportation Index. Board members were granted time-based
awards with vesting periods of approximately six or twelve months. The Company expects to settle all of the stock
unit awards by issuing new shares of stock. The table below summarizes award activity.
Year Ended December 31
2015
2014
2013
Number of
Awards
Weighted
average
grant-date
fair value
Number of
Awards
Weighted
average
grant-date
fair value
Number of
Awards
Weighted
average
grant-date
fair value
Outstanding at beginning of period
1,406,550
$
Granted
Converted
Expired
Forfeited
Outstanding at end of period
Vested
390,200
(498,491)
(126,800)
(13,800)
1,157,659
511,109
$
$
6.21
9.61
5.97
5.52
7.36
7.52
6.03
1,477,762
$
467,567
(404,179)
(116,800)
(17,800)
1,406,550
555,927
$
$
5.83
7.52
6.49
5.70
6.26
6.21
5.73
1,463,272
$
627,488
(526,848)
(68,950)
(17,200)
1,477,762
506,644
$
$
5.97
5.73
5.72
8.25
7.07
5.83
4.47
The average grant-date fair value of each performance condition award, non-vested restricted stock award and time-
based award granted by the Company was $9.22, $7.44 and $5.46 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, the fair value
of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The average grant-date fair value of each market condition award granted
was $10.99, $7.83 and $6.78 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The market condition awards were valued using
a Monte Carlo simulation technique based on volatility over three years for the awards granted in 2015, 2014 and 2013
using daily stock prices and using the following variables:
Risk-free interest rate
Volatility
2015
0.9%
41.5%
2014
0.8%
48.9%
2013
0.4%
61.0%
For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded expense of $2.5 million, $2.9
million and $2.7 million, respectively, for stock incentive awards. At December 31, 2015, there was $2.5 million of
unrecognized expense related to the stock incentive awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.5 years. As of December 31, 2015, none of the awards were convertible, 329,059 units of the Board members
time-based awards had vested and none of the outstanding shares of the restricted stock had vested. These awards
could result in a maximum number of 1,397,659 additional outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock
depending on service, performance and market results through December 31, 2017.
67
NOTE M—EARNINGS PER SHARE
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
December 31
2015
2014
2013
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
Weighted-average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share
$
39,155
$
32,074
$
(19,625)
64,242
64,253
63,992
Common equivalent shares:
Effect of stock-based compensation awards
Weighted-average shares outstanding assuming dilution
Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
885
65,127
0.61
0.60
$
$
958
65,211
0.50
0.49
$
$
—
63,992
(0.31)
(0.31)
$
$
Basic weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of basic earnings per share are less than the shares
outstanding due to 348,600 shares, 435,600 shares and 481,900 shares of restricted stock for 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively, which are accounted for as part of diluted weighted average shares outstanding in diluted earnings per
share. The number of equivalent shares that were not included in weighted average shares outstanding assuming
dilution, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive, was 11,000, none and none at December 31, 2015, 2014
and 2013, respectively.
NOTE N—SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates in two reportable segments. The CAM segment consists of the Company's aircraft leasing
operations and its segment earnings includes an allocation of interest expense. The ACMI Services segment consists
of the Company's airline operations, including the CMI agreement with DHL as well as ACMI and charter service
agreements that the Company has with other customers. Due to the similarities among the Company's airline operations,
the airline operations are aggregated into a single reportable segment, ACMI Services. The Company's other activities,
which include contracts with the USPS, the sale of aircraft parts and maintenance services, facility and ground equipment
maintenance services and management services for workers' compensation while managed separately, are not large
enough to constitute reportable segments and are combined in “All other” with inter-segment profit eliminations. Inter-
segment revenues are valued at arms-length, market rates. Cash, cash equivalents and deferred tax assets are reflected
in Assets - All other below.
68
The Company's segment information from continuing operations is presented below (in thousands):
Total revenues:
CAM
ACMI Services
All other
Eliminate inter-segment revenues
Total
Customer revenues:
CAM
ACMI Services
All other
Total
Depreciation and amortization expense:
CAM
ACMI Services
All other
Total
Other Charges
ACMI Services - pension settlement
ACMI Services - goodwill impairment
Total
Segment earnings (loss):
CAM
ACMI Services
All other
Net unallocated interest expense
Net gain on derivative instruments
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Year Ended December 31
2014
2013
2015
177,789
$
166,303
$
433,109
161,995
439,919
142,294
160,342
444,504
117,292
(153,629)
(158,924)
(142,115)
619,264
$
589,592
$
580,023
93,395
$
77,668
$
431,989
93,880
439,919
72,005
619,264
$
589,592
$
87,765
$
78,866
$
37,526
152
29,929
(541)
125,443
$
108,254
$
—
—
6,700
—
— $
6,700
$
57,457
$
53,159
$
(2,654)
8,561
(1,721)
920
(12,081)
11,363
(1,761)
1,096
71,604
444,504
63,915
580,023
64,096
27,546
107
91,749
—
52,585
52,585
66,208
(78,186)
12,200
(1,212)
631
(359)
Pre-tax earnings from continuing operations
$
62,563
$
51,776
$
The Company's assets are presented below by segment (in thousands):
Assets:
CAM
ACMI Services
Discontinued operations
All other
Total
December 31, December 31, December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
805,318
$
799,164
$
154,852
—
82,093
133,861
—
78,834
806,943
140,354
294
71,591
$
1,042,263
$
1,011,859
$
1,019,182
Interest expense allocated to CAM was $9.4 million, $11.8 million and $12.4 million for the years ending
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
69
During 2015, the Company had capital expenditures of $40.0 million and $114.8 million for the ACMI Services
and CAM segments, respectively. The ACMI Services segment reflects a goodwill impairment charge of $52.6 million
recorded in 2013.
Entity-Wide Disclosures
The Company had revenues of approximately $206.5 million, $205.0 million and $235.1 million for 2015, 2014
and 2013, respectively, derived from aircraft leases in foreign countries or routes with flights departing from or arriving
in foreign countries. All revenues from the CMI agreement with DHL are attributed to U.S. operations. As of December
31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had 17 and 11 aircraft, respectively, outside of the United States.
CAM's revenues include $12.6 million, $11.5 million and $9.9 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, for
engine and other maintenance related payments from customers. The Company's external customers revenues from
other activities for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are presented below (in thousands):
Mail and package handling services
Aircraft maintenance and part sales
Facility and ground equipment maintenance
Other
Total customer revenues
NOTE O—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
47,307
$
34,025
$
33,687
11,490
1,396
26,393
11,119
468
30,117
23,175
10,030
593
$
93,880
$
72,005
$
63,915
The Company's results of discontinued operations consist primarily of pension benefits, adjustments to workers
compensation liabilities and other benefits for former employees previously associated with ABX's former freight
sorting and aircraft fueling services provided to DHL through 2009. ABX sponsors defined benefit plans for retirees
that include the former employees of the hub operations. Additionally, ABX is self-insured for medical coverage and
workers' compensation. The Company may incur expenses and cash outlays in the future related to pension obligations,
reserves for medical expenses and wage loss for former employees. Carrying amounts of significant assets and liabilities
of the discontinued operations are below (in thousands):
Liabilities
Employee compensation and benefits
Post-retirement
Total Liabilities
December 31
2015
2014
$
$
23,400
10,929
34,329
$
$
25,997
10,086
36,083
The revenues and pre-tax earnings of the discontinued operations are below (in thousands):
Pre-tax earnings (loss)
$
3,245
$
(3,477) $
(5)
2015
December 31
2014
2013
70
NOTE P—QUARTERLY RESULTS (Unaudited)
The following is a summary of quarterly results of operations (in thousands, except per share amounts):
2015
Revenues from continuing operations
$
147,025
$
148,353
$
142,305
$ 181,581
1st
Quarter
2nd
Quarter
3rd
Quarter
4th
Quarter
Operating income from continuing operations
Net earnings from continuing operations
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations
Weighted average shares:
Basic
Diluted
Earnings per share from continuing operations
Basic
Diluted
2014 (1)
Revenues from continuing operations
Operating income from continuing operations
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
Net loss from discontinued operations
Weighted average shares:
Basic
Diluted
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
Basic
Diluted
17,529
8,895
214
64,454
65,337
0.14
0.14
143,593
13,836
6,522
211
64,148
65,141
$
$
$
19,794
10,570
214
64,541
65,471
0.16
0.16
149,618
18,117
9,298
211
64,285
65,207
12,917
6,347
214
64,239
65,171
22,550
13,343
1,425
63,742
64,536
$
$
$
0.10
0.10
$
$
0.21
0.21
138,443
$ 157,938
18,287
9,595
312
64,286
65,271
14,285
6,659
(2,948)
64,289
65,222
0.10
0.10
$
$
0.14
0.14
$
$
0.15
0.15
$
$
0.10
0.10
$
$
$
$
$
1.
In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company recorded pre-tax pension settlement charges of $6.7 million to continued
operations and $5.0 million to discontinued operations (see Note H).
71
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2015, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation
of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")). Based upon the evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and
presentation.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2015. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013).
Based on management’s assessment of those criteria, management believes that, as of December 31, 2015, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
March 14, 2016
72
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
Wilmington, Ohio
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Air Transport Services Group, Inc. and subsidiaries
(the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
company’s principle financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board
of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions
and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of the inherent limitation of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion
or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial
reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standard of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December
31, 2015 of the Company and our report dated March 14, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial
statements and financial statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s two
principal customers.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
March 14, 2016
73
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance,” and “Corporate Governance and Board Matters.”
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information about the Company’s executive officers. The executive officers serve at
the pleasure of the Company’s Board of Directors.
Name
Joseph C. Hete
Age
61
Quint O. Turner
53
Richard F. Corrado
56
W. Joseph Payne
52
Information
President and Chief Executive Officer, Air Transport Services Group,
Inc., since December 2007 and Chief Executive Officer, ABX Air, Inc.,
since August 2003.
Mr. Hete was President of ABX Air, Inc. from January 2000 to February
2008. Mr. Hete was Chief Operating Officer of ABX Air, Inc. from
January 2000 to August 2003. From 1997 until January 2000, Mr. Hete
held the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
of ABX Air, Inc. Mr. Hete served as Senior Vice President,
Administration of ABX Air, Inc. from 1991 to 1997 and Vice President,
Administration of ABX Air, Inc. from 1986 to 1991. Mr. Hete joined
ABX Air, Inc. in 1980.
Chief Financial Officer, Air Transport Services Group, Inc., since
February 2008 and Chief Financial Officer, ABX Air, Inc. since
December 2004.
Mr. Turner was Vice President of Administration of ABX Air, Inc. from
February 2002 to December 2004. Mr. Turner was Corporate Director
of Financial Planning and Accounting of ABX Air, Inc. from 1997 to
2002. Prior to 1997, Mr. Turner held positions of Manager of Planning
and Director of Financial Planning of ABX Air, Inc. Mr. Turner joined
ABX Air, Inc. in 1988.
Chief Commercial Officer, Air Transport Services Group, Inc., and
President of Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. since April 2010.
President of Airborne Global Solutions, Inc. since July 2010.
Before joining ATSG, Mr. Corrado was President of Transform
Consulting Group from July 2006 through March 2010 and Chief
Operating Officer of AFMS Logistics Management from February
2008 through March 2010. He was Executive Vice President of Air
Services and Business Development for DHL Express from September
2003 through June of 2006; and Senior Vice President of Marketing
for Airborne Express from August 2000 through August 2003.
Senior Vice President, Corporate General Counsel and Secretary, Air
Transport Services Group, Inc., since February 2008 and Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary ABX Air, Inc. since January
2004.
Mr. Payne was Corporate Secretary/Counsel of ABX Air, Inc. from
January 1999 to January 2004, and Assistant Corporate Secretary from
July 1996 to January 1999. Mr. Payne joined ABX Air, Inc. in April
1995.
74
The executive officers of the Company are appointed annually at the Board of Directors meeting held in conjunction
with the annual meeting of stockholders. There are no family relationships between any directors or executive officers
of the Company.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation.”
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The responses to this Item are incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016
Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Equity Compensation Plan Information,” “Voting at the Meeting,”
“Stock Ownership of Management” and “Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.”
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Related Person Transactions” and “Independence.”
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Fees of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
List of Documents filed as part of this report:
(1)
Consolidated Financial Statements
The following are filed in Part II, item 8 of this Form 10-K Annual Report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2)
Financial Statement Schedules
75
Description
Accounts receivable reserve:
Year ended:
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Account
Balance at
beginning
of period
Additions
charged to
cost and expenses
Deductions
Balance at end
of period
$
$
811,875
716,913
748,929
$
138,310
137,555
193,046
$
534,849
42,593
225,062
415,336
811,875
716,913
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or are not required, or because the required
information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(3)
Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference into this report.
Exhibit No.
Description of Exhibit
Articles of Incorporation
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
Certificate of Incorporation of Air Transport Services Group, Inc. (formerly known as ABX
Holdings, Inc.). (6)
Bylaws of Air Transport Services Group, Inc. (formerly known as ABX Holdings, Inc.). (6)
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
reflecting corrections and amendments through May 17, 2013. [This document represents the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Air Transport Services Group, Inc. in
compiled form, incorporating all corrections and amendments. This compiled document has not
been filed with the Delaware Secretary of State.] (20)
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Air Transport Services Group, Inc., reflecting amendments
through May 10, 2013. (20)
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
reflecting corrections and amendments through August 16, 2013. [This document represents the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Air Transport Services Group, Inc. in
compiled form, incorporating all corrections and amendments. This compiled document has not
been filed with the Delaware Secretary of State.] (21)
Material Contracts
Director compensation fee summary. (9)
Aircraft Loan and Security Agreement and related promissory note, dated August 24, 2006, by
and among ABX Air, Inc. and Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc. (2)
Aircraft Loan and Security Agreement and related promissory note, dated October 10, 2006, by
and among ABX Air, Inc. and Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc. (3)
Aircraft Loan and Security Agreement and related promissory note, dated February 16, 2007, by
and among ABX Air, Inc. and Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc. (4)
Aircraft Loan and Security Agreement and related promissory note, dated April 25, 2007, by
and among ABX Air, Inc. and Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc. (5)
76
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
Aircraft Loan and Security Agreement and related promissory note, dated October 26, 2007, by
and among ABX Air, Inc. and Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc. (8)
Aircraft Loan and Security Agreement and related promissory note, dated December 19, 2007,
by and among ABX Air, Inc. and Chase Equipment Leasing, Inc. (8)
Amended and Restated First Non-Negotiable Promissory Note between ABX Air, Inc., as
maker, and DHL Express (USA), Inc., as holder, dated May 8, 2009. (7)
Guaranty by Air Transport Services Group, Inc. in favor of DHL Express (USA), Inc., dated
May 8, 2009. (7)
Lease Assumption and Option Agreement between DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. and
ABX Air, Inc., dated May 29, 2009. (7)
Air Transportation Services Agreement between DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. and
ABX Air, Inc., dated March 29, 2010. (10)
Mutual Termination Agreement and Release, made among DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc., DHL
Network Operations (USA), Inc., DHL Express (USA), Inc., Air Transport Services Group, Inc.,
and ABX Air, Inc., dated March 29, 2010. (10)
Second Amendment to Lease Assumption and Option Agreement and Exercise of Lease Option,
between DHL Network Operations (USA), Inc. and ABX Air, Inc., dated March 29, 2010. (10)
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement under Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
2005 Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan. (11)
Form of Performance-Based Stock Unit Award Agreement under Air Transport Services Group,
Inc. 2005 Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan. (11)
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under Air Transport Services Group, Inc. 2005
Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan. (22)
Conversion Agreement dated August 3, 2010, between Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc., M&B
Conversions Limited and Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. (12)
Letter Agreement, dated October 15, 2010, between Precision Conversions, LLC and Cargo
Aircraft Management, Inc. (13)
Credit Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2011, among Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc., as
Borrower, Air Transport Services Group, Inc., the Lenders from time to time party thereto,
SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, Regions Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Syndication Agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agent. (14)
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2011, made by Cargo Aircraft
Management, Inc. and certain of its Affiliates in favor of SunTrust Bank, as Administrative
Agent. (14)
Amendment to Confidentiality and Standstill Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2012, between
Air Transport Services Group, Inc. and Red Mountain Capital Partners LLC. (15)
Form of amended and restated change-in-control agreement in effect between Air Transport
Services Group, Inc. and its executive officers. (17)
Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated July 20, 2012, among Cargo Aircraft Management,
Inc., as Borrower, Air Transport Services Group, Inc., the Lenders from time to time party
thereto, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, Regions Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., as Syndication Agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agent. (16)
77
10.24
10.25
10.26
10.27
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
10.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
10.36
Purchase and sale agreement, dated December 17, 2012, between Cargo Aircraft Management,
Inc., and National Air Cargo Group, Inc. for the purchase of three Boeing 757-200 aircraft.
Those portions of the Agreement marked with an [*] have been omitted pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the SEC. (18)
Amended and Restated Lease Agreement, dated December 27, 2012, between Clinton County
Port Authority and Air Transport Services Group, Inc. (18)
Loan Agreement, Chapter 166, Ohio Revised Code, dated December 1, 2012, between the
Director of Development Services Agency of Ohio and Clinton County Port Authority. (18)
Guaranty Agreement, dated December 1, 2012, among Air Transport Services Group, Inc.,
Airborne Maintenance and Engineering Services, Inc., Air Transport International, LLC,
Clinton County Port Authority, the Directory of Development Services Agency of Ohio, and the
Huntington National Bank. (18)
Lease Agreement for the Jump Hangar Facility, dated December 1, 2012, between Clinton
County Port Authority and Air Transport International, LLC. (18)
Leasehold Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Financing
Statement, dated December 1, 2012, among Air Transport International, LLC and the Director
of Development Services Agency of Ohio. (18)
Bond Purchase Agreement, dated December 13, 2012, among the State of Ohio, acting by and
through its Treasurer of State, the Development Services Agency of Ohio, acting by and through
a duly authorized representative, Clinton County Port Authority, Air Transport International,
LLC and Stifel, Niolaus & Company, Inc. (18)
Air Transport Services Group, Inc. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, last modified
March 18, 2013. (19)
Air Transport Services Group, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, dated October
31, 2013. (21)
Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated October 22, 2013, among Cargo Aircraft
Management, Inc., as Borrower, Air Transport Services Group, Inc., the Lenders from time to
time party thereto, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, Regions Bank and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation
Agents. (21)
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and First Amendment to Guarantee and Collateral
Agreement, dated May 6, 2014, by and among Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc., as Borrower,
Air Transport Services Group, Inc., each of the Guarantors party thereto, each of the financial
institutions party thereto as "Lenders", and SunTrust Bank as Administrative Agent. (23)
Amended and Restated Air Transportation Services Agreement between DHL Network
Operations (USA), Inc., ABX Air, Inc. and Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc., dated January 14,
2015. Those portions of the Agreement marked with an [*] have been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the SEC. (24)
Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 8, 2015, by and among Cargo Aircraft
Management, Inc., as Borrower, Air Transport Services Group, Inc., each of the Guarantors
party thereto, each of the financial institutions party thereto as "Lenders" and SunTrust Bank, in
its capacity as Administrative Agent. (25)
10.37
Description of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors. (25)
78
14.1
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
Code of Ethics
Code of Ethics—CEO and CFO. (1)
List of Significant Subsidiaries
List of Significant Subsidiaries of Air Transport Services Group, Inc., filed within.
Consent of experts and counsel
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, filed herewith.
Certifications
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
101.INS
101.SCH
101.CAL
101.DEF
101.LAB
101.PRE
XBRL Instance Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
____________________
(1)
(2)
The Company's Code of Ethics can be accessed from the Company's Internet website at www.atsginc.com.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 9, 2006.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed on August 14, 2007 with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 14, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 14, 2007.
Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A/A of ABX Holdings, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
on January 2, 2008.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 10, 2009.
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 17, 2008 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,
Corporate Governance and Board Matters, filed March 28, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 10, 2010. Those portions of the Agreement marked with an [*] have been
omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the SEC.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 10, 2010.
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
79
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 3, 2010. Those portions of the Agreement marked with an [*] have been
omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the SEC.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 8, 2011. Those portions of the Agreement marked with an [*] have been
omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the SEC.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 3, 2011.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 18, 2012.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on July 24, 2012.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 2, 2012.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 4, 2013. Those portions of the Agreement marked with an [*] have been
omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the SEC.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 18, 2013.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 8, 2013.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 6, 2013.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 12, 2014.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 5, 2014.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 8, 2015, as amended by the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2015.
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 7, 2015.
Exhibits can be viewed by accessing Air Transport Services Group, Inc. Form 10-K at www.atsginc.com or www.sec.gov.
80
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
Signature
Title
Date
/S/ JOSEPH C. HETE
Joseph C. Hete
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
March 14, 2016
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated:
Signature
Title
Date
/S/ RANDY D. RADEMACHER
Randy D. Rademacher
Director and Chairman of the Board
March 14, 2016
/S/ RICHARD M. BAUDOUIN
Richard M. Baudouin
Director
/S/ JOSEPH C. HETE
Joseph C. Hete
/S/ ARTHUR J. LICHTE
Arthur J. Lichte
/S/ J. CHRISTOPHER TEETS
J. Christopher Teets
/S/ JEFFREY J. VORHOLT
Jeffrey J. Vorholt
/S/ QUINT O. TURNER
Quint O. Turner
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Director
Director
Director
March 14, 2016
March 14, 2016
March 14, 2016
March 14, 2016
March 14, 2016
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
March 14, 2016
81
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Air Transport Services Group 2015 Annual Report
Investor Information
Stock Information
NASDAQ: ATSG
Company documents electronically filed with
the SEC also may be found at www.atsginc.com.
Independent Auditors
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Dayton, Ohio
Registrar and Transfer Agent
Computershare Investor Services
(877) 581-5548 or (781) 575-2879
www.computershare.com/investor
Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of stockholders
will be May 12, 2016, at 11 a.m. local
time at The Roberts Centre, 123 Gano
Road, Wilmington, Ohio.
By mail:
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
By courier:
250 Royall Street
Canton, MA 02021
Investor Relations
Telephone inquiries may be directed
to (937) 434-2700.
Board of Directors
Randy D. Rademacher
Chief Financial Offi cer of Reading Rock, Inc., a
privately owned manufacturer and distributor of
concrete products and other building materials. Mr.
Rademacher has been a Director of the Company
since December 2006 and Chairman of the Board
since May 2015. He also is a member of the
Nominating and Governance Committee and the
Audit Committee.
Richard M. Baudouin
Principal at Infi nity Aviation Capital LLC, an
investment fi rm involved in aircraft leasing. Mr.
Baudouin has been a Director of the Company since
January 2013 and is the Chairman of the Audit
Committee and the Nominating and Governance
Committee and a member of the Audit Committee.
Joseph C. Hete
President and Chief Executive Offi cer of Air
Transport Services Group, Inc. and Chief Executive
Offi cer of ABX Air, Inc. Mr. Hete has been with the
company since 1980.
General Arthur J. Lichte, USAF (retired)
Retired four-star general of the U.S. Air Force
and former Commander of the Air Mobility
Command at Scott Air Force Base. General
Lichte has been a Director of the Company
since February 2013 and is a member of the
Audit Committee and the Compensation
Committee.
J. Christopher Teets
Partner of Red Mountain Capital Partners
LLC. Mr. Teets has been a Director of the
Company since February 2009. He is the
Chairman of the Compensation Committee
and a member of the Nominating and
Governance Committee.
Jeff rey J. Vorholt
Independent consultant and private investor.
Mr. Vorholt has been a Director of the
Company since January 2004. He is the
Chairman of the Audit Committee and is a
member of the Compensation Committee.
.
m
a
h
g
n
n
n
u
C
i
l
u
a
P
:
i
n
g
s
e
D
-
.
c
n
I
,
p
u
o
r
G
s
e
c
v
r
e
S
i
t
r
o
p
s
n
a
r
T
r
i
A
6
1
0
2
©
47376.indd 5
4/1/16 9:11 AM
Air Transport Services Group, Inc.
145 Hunter Drive
Wilmington, Ohio 45177
www.atsginc.com
47376.indd 6
4/1/16 9:11 AM