More annual reports from Allianz:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Allianz:
Cooper-StandardAnnual and Sustainability Report 2023 CONTENT Autoliv at a Glance Year in Brief CEO Message – Transforming with a Changing Industry 70 Years of Saving More Lives Vision / Mission / Key Behaviors Financial Summary 2023 Financial and Sustainability Targets Strategy for Change Customer Focus Strengthening Our Position in a Changing Market Customer Collaboration Competitive Products and Solutions Products for Saving More Lives Innovation as an Enabler to Save More Lives Efficient Value Delivery Operational Excellence Value to Customers The Autoliv Way Outstanding People Embracing Change Sustainability A Driving Force in Sustainable Mobility Sustainability Materiality Assessment Sustainability Governance Road Safety – a Global Challenge Climate and Circularity TCFD Disclosure A Safe and Inclusive Workplace Responsible Business Sustainability Appendix The Autoliv Share Creating Shareholder Value Board and Management Board of Directors Executive Management Team Contacts Multi-Year Financial Summary 23 04 06 08 10 12 14 18 20 22 24 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 43 48 50 52 59 64 68 69 70 71 Forward-Looking Statements Except for historical information, matters discussed in the annual report are forward-looking statements and are based on management’s estimates, assumptions and projections. Actual results could vary materially. Please review the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, and subsequent SEC filings, for factors that could affect the Company’s performance and cause results to differ materially from management’s expectations. The information in this report reflected management’s estimates, assumptions and projections as of January 26, 2024. Autoliv has not made updates since then and makes no representation, express or implied, that the information is still current or complete. The Company is under no obligation to update any part of this document. This report includes content supplied by S&P Global. Copyright © Light Vehicle Production Forecast, January 2024. All rights reserved. Cover: One of our latest steering wheels include an interactive screen that enhances the driving experience. The display is integrated into the steering wheel, and feature mini-LED and multi-touch technologies to enable easier interactions, making driving safer. Location and Capabilities Headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. Incorporated in Delaware, United States Location 3) Headcount Tech center Production Sales support Other 2) BRAZIL1) CANADA CHINA1) ESTONIA1) FRANCE GERMANY HUNGARY1) INDIA1) INDONESIA1) JAPAN MALAYSIA1) 1,159 448 9,466 895 1,669 783 1,680 4,178 193 2,184 MEXICO1) 15,615 PHILIPPINES1) POLAND1) 1,291 2,343 ROMANIA1) 10,010 SOUTH AFRICA1) SOUTH KOREA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND THAILAND1) TUNISIA1) TURKEY1) 234 480 421 538 20 4,516 4,397 3,055 UNITED KINGDOM 250 USA 4,321 1) Defined as a best-cost country. 2) Includes weaving and sewing of textile cushions and seatbelt webbing, inflators, and components for airbag and seatbelt products. 3) Our operations in Russia are currently suspended and offices in Italy and the Netherlands are closing in 2024. 03 Headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. Incorporated in Delaware, United States Location 3) Headcount Tech center Production Sales support Other 2) BRAZIL1) CANADA CHINA1) ESTONIA1) FRANCE GERMANY HUNGARY1) INDIA1) INDONESIA1) JAPAN MALAYSIA1) PHILIPPINES1) POLAND1) SOUTH AFRICA1) SOUTH KOREA SPAIN SWEDEN SWITZERLAND THAILAND1) TUNISIA1) TURKEY1) 1,159 448 9,466 895 1,669 783 1,680 4,178 193 2,184 1,291 2,343 234 480 421 538 20 4,516 4,397 3,055 MEXICO1) 15,615 ROMANIA1) 10,010 UNITED KINGDOM 250 USA 4,321 AUTOLIV AT A GLANCE Year in Brief The World’s Largest Automotive Safety Supplier Share of total sales by division E U R O P E 27% A M E R I C A S 34% C H I N A 20% A S I A 19% A utoliv, Inc. (NYSE: ALV; Nasdaq Stockholm: ALIV.sdb) is the worldwide leader in automotive safety systems. At Autoliv, we challenge and redefine the standards of mobility safety to sus- tainably deliver leading solutions. We develop, manufacture and market protective systems, such as airbags, seatbelts, and steering wheels, for all major automotive manufactur- ers in the world. In 2023, our products saved 35,000 lives and reduced more than 450,000 injuries. A major focus area for us is new safety solutions driven by the evolution of the global automotive market trends. To extend into new market areas beyond light vehicles and oc- cupant safety, Autoliv’s Mobility Safety Solutions (MSS) complements our core business by pursuing new areas for profitable growth in adjacent markets. Our focus is on areas where we can leverage our technological know-how, opera- tional capabilities, and global footprint. In 2023, we focused on commercial vehicles, electrical safety solutions like py- rotechnical safety switches and safety products for motor- cycles and bikes. The rise of electric vehicles (EVs) and connected cars in the global market is one of the trends that are currently trans- forming the automotive industry. We are well-positioned to sustainably adapt to the business opportunities that come with these changes. 04 Key Figures 2023 $10.5b net sales 8.8% adj. operating margin* $982m operating cash flow 23% renewable electricity use 70,300 associates worldwide 45% market share 29% improvement in GHG emissions intensity $577m shareholder returns *) Non-U.S. GAAP Measure. See "Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures" section in the 10-K filed with the SEC. 35,000 Lives Saved Colleagues at Autoliv in Michigan U.S. celebrating Autoliv´s 70 years anniversary. 05 AUTOLIV AT A GLANCE CEO Message Transforming with a Changing Industry The world is changing at an accelerating pace and Autoliv launched a number of strategic initiatives in 2023 to meet the needs of its customers, to enhance shareholder value, and deliver safe mobility solutions for society. During the year, Autoliv delivered significantly improved profits supported by new collaborations, footprint optimization, structural cost reductions, cost compensations, and a committed focus on sustainability, innovation, and quality. Market development It was an intense and challenging year for the automotive indus- try. 2023 was marked by inflationary pressure and strong devel- opment for domestic Chinese OEMs (vehicle manufacturers). Despite the inflationary environment and rising interest rates, global car production increased by almost 10% and, according to S&P Global, is expected to grow by one million vehicles per year in the coming five years. We have also continued to see supply chain stability improvements, with reduced customer call off volatility throughout the year, although the progress stagnat- ed in the second half of the year. The rise of electric vehicles (EVs) and connected cars, and the emergence of Chinese OEMs on the global scene are some of the trends that are currently transforming the automotive in- dustry. We are well-positioned to sustainably manage the busi- ness opportunities that come with these changes. Strong financial performance Throughout 2023, we implemented several strategic initiatives to meet the needs of the evolving global automotive industry, such as successfully negotiating price adjustments, optimizing our footprint, and implementing structural cost reductions. As a result, we have delivered a significantly improved profit, in line with our guidance at the beginning of the year. At our Investor Day in June, we reiterated our target of a 12% adjusted operating margin*. We have built a solid founda- tion in 2023, and expect 2024 to be an important step towards our financial targets. Reshaping Autoliv to meet the market today and in the future In June, we announced forceful actions and footprint optimiza- tion to respond to a prolonged challenging market environment and our intention to reduce our workforce by up to 2,000 indirect employees. Most of these reductions are now communicated and we aim to complete these activities by 2026. This unfortu- nately means that we have to part ways with a number of Autoliv team members in order to secure our long-term competitive- ness. The footprint optimization is particularly focused on Europe, with consolidations in Germany, France and Sweden and planned site closures in the UK, Italy and the Netherlands. These actions will help to strengthen the company’s competitive position in the long term, adapting it to a substantially lower level of light vehicle production in postpandemic Europe. A relentless focus on quality and innovation Quality is at the heart of everything we do and we continuously strive to improve our performance. This requires us to always focus on quality across the value chain and, as part of our prod- uct life-cycle management program, we continue to develop a proactive End-to-End approach to achieve Zero Defects. Autoliv’s Mobility Safety Solutions (MSS) is complementing our core business by pursuing new, attractive areas for profitable growth in adjacent markets. We are focusing on areas where we can leverage our technological know-how, operational capabili- ties, and global footprint. In 2023, our efforts primarily focused on the products for commercial vehicles, electrical safety solu- tions like pyrotechnical safety switches, and safety systems for motorcycles and bikes. A strong position with fast-growing Chinese OEMs China manufactures the most EVs in the world and has become the leading light vehicle exporter. It is encouraging for our me- dium- and long-term potential that we continue to improve our position with China's fast-growing domestic OEMs. We announced several collaborations with Chinese OEMs in *) Non-U.S. GAAP Measure. See "Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures" section in the 10-k filed with the SEC. 06 2023 that are allowing us to bring new innovations to the mar- ket at a rapid pace. We signed strategic cooperation agreements with NIO, Chery, and Great Wall Motor. Together, we are driving innovation and developing advanced technologies with a focus on quality and addressing opportunities and challenges in the rapidly evolving global automotive market. progress in reducing GHG emissions from our own operations. For example, year-over-year we reduced GHG emissions from our own operations by 17%. I also want to highlight our use of renewable electricity, which has increased from 1% in 2021, to 13% in 2022, to 23% in 2023. I am proud of our team’s success and eager to see continued action throughout all parts of Autoliv. New safety products to meet evolving customer demands Already the market leader in safety products for light vehicles, we are well-positioned to meet the needs for additional safety for EVs as well as motorcycles and bikes. We view the strong elec- tric vehicle trend as positive as the electrification can create de- mand for new safety solutions and more advanced products. We are well-positioned regardless of how the demand for electric vehicles develops as we have a strong presence with both EV and internal combustion engine (ICE) platforms. The Bernoulli Airbag™ is a recent example of how we in- novate to sustainably adapt to the business opportunities that come with evolving customer and market demands. This new technology enables cost-efficient large airbags like the ones needed in newer electric vehicles with roomier cockpits and comfortable seating. We are also pioneering improved safety for more than 500 million road users through our holistic approach to motorcycle and bikes safety. The first new motorcycle safety product to reach the market will be the Bag-on-Bike airbag. This airbag can significantly reduce the risk of serious injury for powered two- wheeler riders in frontal crashes. Sustainability – an integral part of our business Sustainability is an integral part of our vision of Saving More Lives and a fundamental driver for market differentiation and stakeholder value creation. Our products save 35,000 lives and reduce more than 450,000 injuries every year. Our ambition is to save 100,000 lives per year. Our business directly contributes to the realization of sev- eral UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and, as a UN Global Compact signatory, we are committed to following its prin- ciples. Autoliv supports the UN Road Safety Fund (UNRSF) and its mission to increase awareness and availability of life-saving products where they are most needed. Through Autoliv’s col- laboration with the UNRSF, we contribute our knowledge and experience of global traffic safety challenges, while gaining ad- ditional insights into the most challenging road safety situations facing the world today. Autoliv is committed to providing safe and healthy working conditions for our employees. We make health and safety an integral part of everyday business by integrating it into our pro- duction system and throughout all our projects and processes. In 2023, we took several steps to better manage high-risk activities. Risk assessments and implementing new ways of working sup- port an even safer work environment. As part of our Green Factory program, we identify areas that will help us save both energy and costs. Our manufacturing fa- cilities carry out assessments covering energy use, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water, and waste, to assess their perfor- mance and identify opportunities for improvement. We are committed to climate action. During the year, we made For 70 years, we have been pioneers in automotive safety and we have delivered many world firsts to the market. Celebrating 70 years of Saving More Lives In 2023, we celebrated our 70th anniversary. Since our founding, we have been pioneers in automotive safety and we have deliv- ered many world firsts to the market. Brave decisions, a focus on quality and innovation, and a desire to remain at the technologi- cal forefront have made Autoliv the worldwide market leader. In 2023, our colleagues took part in global birthday celebra- tions. Together, we celebrated seven decades of Saving More Lives in our plants and offices across the world. I am proud of the outstanding efforts of the Autoliv team and what the team continues to achieve in a challenging environment. We have a strong foundation that we continue to build on. Going forward 2023 developed in line with our outlook at the beginning of the year. We laid a solid foundation in 2023 and expect 2024 to be an important step towards our 12% adjusted operating margin* target. Our order intake was strong in 2023 and we ended the year on a positive note, having executed on our strategic initia- tives, secured cost compensations, and delivered a sales growth of 18%, which is a gratifying result considering the environment in which we operate. Autoliv’s tax rate for 2023 was lower than previously antici- pated, with a full-year tax rate of around 20%. This is due to the ongoing reorganization of our global functions and European operations. These changes are also expected to reduce the nor- malized tax rate to be within a range of around 25-30% onwards. At Autoliv, our everyday work is guided by our important vi- sion of Saving More Lives. While celebrating our 70th anniver- sary with the team, I reflected on how well Autoliv has performed in a challenging market these past few years. I am convinced that Autoliv's clear vision and strategy for long-term growth, with a fo- cus on quality, technology, sustainability, and innovation, ensure that we are well-positioned to adapt to future market trends and demands. We welcome you to join us on this exciting continuing journey. Mikael Bratt President and CEO 07 AUTOLIV AT A GLANCE 70 Years of Saving More Lives 70 Years of Saving More Lives In 2023, Autoliv celebrated its 70 years anniversary. The Autoliv story began in 1953 when two brothers, Lennart and Stig Lindblad, founded a small automotive parts and service company in Vårgårda, Sweden. 1997 Autoliv Inc. is formed through a merger of Autoliv AB, Europe’s leading automotive safety company, and Morton ASP, the leading airbag manufacturer in North America and Asia. Morton ASP began airbag production in 1980. 1956 The founder Lennart Lindblad develops the company’s first seatbelt, a two-point static belt. 1953 The company is founded by Lennart Lindblad under the name Lindblads Autoservice AB. After 25 years, Lennart Lindblad leaves the company in 1977. 1980 Autoliv becomes a subsidiary of Electrolux when the house- hold goods manufacturing group acquires Gränges AB, an industrial conglomerate. In 1984, the Company’s name is changed to Electrolux Autoliv AB. 1998 Our inflatable curtain side airbag is introduced. It pro- tects the occupants’ heads in a side-impact collision and covers the upper side of the vehicle. 08 Celebrating 70 years all over the world For 70 years, we have been pioneers in automotive safety solutions and we have delivered many world firsts to the market. Brave decisions, a focus on quality and a desire to remain at the technological forefront have made Autoliv a worldwide market leader. 2012 The world's first outside pedestrian protection airbag. This helps car manufacturers meet stricter Euro NCAP requirements. Autoliv introduces the environmentally friendly airbag inflator APG, recognized by the PACE Award. 2023 Autoliv unveils a patented revolutionary new passenger airbag module based on Bernoulli’s principle that can inflate larger airbags more efficiently and reduce development time and costs. 2018 Autoliv spins off its electronics segment. The new independent company, Veoneer Inc., begins trading on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq Stockholm on July 2, 2018. 2022 Introducing airbag systems for powered two-wheelers. The system is mounted on the vehicle frame and will deploy in milliseconds, for greater rider safety. 09 AUTOLIV AT A GLANCE Vision/Mission/Key Behaviors Our Vision Our Mission Saving More Lives Providing World-Class Life-Saving Solutions for Mobility and Society Our Key Behaviors We are the market leader in our industry and what we do matters. This calls for a focused approach to our ways of working. Our Key Behaviors express the essence of our ways of working in a clear and consistent way and define how we strive to achieve success together with colleagues, customers, and partners. Take Ownership Be Curious Add Value Collaborate Make it Easy Driving Improvements in all Areas of Our Business Through the Autoliv Awards and Recognition Program, we ac- knowledge and recognize colleagues who exceed expectations in enhancing Autoliv’s performance and profitability. The award cat- egories and winning projects in 2023 are presented below, each of which made outstanding contributions in their respective areas: • Health, Safety and Sustainability: Machine safety improvements • Quality: Airbag cushion folding process • Operations Excellence – Production: Reducing helium consumption • Operations Excellence – Non-Production: Leadership Academy • Innovation: Successful design of a steering wheel with an illuminated logo These great achievements truly embody the desired Autoliv Key Behaviors and ways of working. 10 Survivor Story Every day, our products save lives. Every time they do, there is a person and a story behind it. I wanted to share an incident with you involving my 17-year old son Riley. On a Monday afternoon, he was on his way home from Fremont High School when he veered off the road in his 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee. He veered off the road directly before a canal. He jumped the canal in his Jeep and impacted on the far side bank with the front of his vehicle. When the front of the vehicle dug into the ground, the Jeep flipped over onto the roof coming to rest on the driveway of a house. Riley was able to get out of the vehicle almost unscathed. All he had was a small goose egg on his head. We are firm believers in seatbelts in our family and he was wearing his. I was a police officer for 20 years and have seen a lot of serious accidents. I truly believe if he had not been wearing his seatbelt, or had a vehicle without airbags, his injuries would have been severe. Even though the airbags are 21 years or older, they functioned perfectly! William Taylor Security Supervisor Autoliv Tremonton, United States 11 AUTOLIV AT A GLANCE Financial Summary 2023 2023 Summary We ended the year again with strong profit- ability and cash flow after managing to off- set significant market challenges, especially high inflationary pressure on costs for labor and energy and a volatile and unpredictable Light Vehicle Production (LVP). 2023 was another important step towards our targets. We continued to strengthen our position as the market leader through our high order intake, strong sales growth and the solid profitability and cash flow performance. In 2023, the high cost inflation continued to be driven by labor and energy costs rather than by raw materials as in 2022. Through price adjustments, we managed to gradu- ally offset the inflation, resulting in a year that generated new company records for sales, adjusted operating income*, op- erating cash flow as well as adjusted earnings per share*. in some markets resulted A continued strong end-consumer demand for new vehicles and re-stocking in global LVP growing by about 9%, and finally recovering to pre-pandemic level. All regions grew strongly, with Eu- rope leading the way with 13% growth. Despite some im- provements, we continued to experience late changes to call-offs with short notice as global car manufacturers (OEMs) managed to match availability of components. This negatively impacted our production ef- ficiency and profitability. their output Our sales increased organically* by 18%, outperforming global LVP by around 9 percentage points. This was the sixth consecutive year that we outperformed global LVP by 5 to 12 percentage points, driven by price increases, increased market shares and higher safety content per vehicle. Our adjusted operating margin* improved from 5.3% in the first quarter to 12.1% in the fourth quarter, as a result of success- ful negotiations regarding cost compensation and our strong focus on continuous improvements throughout the organi- zation. For the full year the adjusted operating margin* im- proved by 2 percentage points to 8.8%. Operating cash flow improved from prior year to a new record of $982 million, mainly due to higher adjusted oper- ating profit* and positive working capital effects. Free cash flow* amounted to $414 million, an increase of $186 million. Capex, net in relation to sales was 5.4%, and cash conver- sion improved to around 85%. In 2023, we paid $2.66 per share in dividends, an in- crease of around 3% from 2022, and repurchased and re- tired 3.67 million shares. In 2023, the GHG emissions in our own operations were reduced by 17% compared to 2022, and our use of renew- able electricity increased from 13% to 23%. *) Non-U.S. GAAP Measure. See "Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures" section in the 10-k filed with the SEC. 12 Sales and Global LVP US$ (Millions) and Units (Millions) Organic Growth* vs. LVP Change Percentage Points Sales by Division 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 95 75 55 35 15 8 6 4 2 0 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 Sales LVP Outperformance Americas 34% Asia 19% Europe 27% China 20% Japan 8% China 21% Americas 33% 27% Gross Profit & Gross Margin US$ (Millions) and in relation to sales % Adjusted Operating Profit & Margin* US$ (Millions) and in relation to sales % Operating Cash Flow & Cash Conversion* US$ (Millions) and in % 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 20 18 16 14 12 10 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 10 8 6 4 2 0 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 Gross Profit Gross Margin Adjusted Operating Income* Adjusted Operating Margin* Operating Cash Flow Cash Conversion* Return on Capital Employed % Return on Equity % Leverage Ratio Net Debt/ EBITDA 25 20 15 10 5 0 25 20 15 10 5 0 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Long-Term Target: 1.0x 0.5-1.5x Long-Term Range 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 13 AUTOLIV AT A GLANCE Financial and Sustainability Targets Leveraging Industry Trends into Sustainable Growth and Higher Profitability Financial targets Autoliv is providing world-class life-saving mobility solu- tions while transforming our operations for the new age of electrification and autonomous driving, as well as digitali- zation and automation throughout the whole value chain. Our ability to consistently outperform light vehicle pro- duction growth and leverage our growth into higher profit- ability is rooted in our continuous investment in new safety technologies, a strong focus on quality, and a superior and cost effective production and engineering footprint. In the medium-term, we intend to continue to grow our core busi- ness – airbags, seatbelts and steering wheels – through successful execution of the current product launch pro- grams and order book. In order to maintain the growth momentum, we are pursuing an ambitious innovation program that includes creating several world first safety products and investing in capabilities beyond the light vehicle market. To success- fully leverage growth into higher profitability, we rely on driving End-to-End operational excellence while providing superior quality to our customers in terms of product per- formance and delivery reliability. Sustainability targets Sustainability is an integral part of our business strat- egy and an important driver for market differentiation and stakeholder value creation, helping to ensure that our busi- ness will continue to thrive and contribute to sustainable development in the long term. Guided by our vision of Saving More Lives and our mis- sion to provide world-class, life-saving solutions for mobil- ity and society, we have set short- and long-term sustain- ability targets in key areas. Our sustainability targets and ambitions are anchored in well-established international frameworks such as the UN Global Compact and Science Based Targets. Our sustainability approach is based on four focus ar- eas – Saving More Lives, A Safe and Inclusive Workplace, Climate and Circularity and Responsible Business – each consisting of long-term ambitions and more specific short- term targets. 14 Financial Key Targets: Organic sales growth* 2022- 2024 LVP+~4% Average annual organic growth* Excluding cost compensations Long- Term (beyond 2024) 4-6% Average annual organic growth* Financial Key Target & Ambition: Profitability Target ~12% Adjusted operating margin* Long- Term Ambition ~13% Adjusted operating margin* Sustainability Key Targets and Ambitions Saving More Lives 100,000 Lives saved per year A Safe and Inclusive Workplace 0.35 Incident Rate by 2024 95% of senior and mid-level management trained in unconscious bias Year-on-year improvement in employee experience Climate and Circularity Carbon neutrality in own operations by 2030 Net-zero emissions across our supply chain by 2040 Year-on-year improvement in energy intensity 22% women in senior management by 2024 Year-on-year reduction in waste Responsible Business 100% in target group completed Antitrust training 100% in target group Code of Conduct certified 100% direct material suppliers sustainability audited 100% direct material suppliers respond to conflict minerals survey *) Non-U.S. GAAP Measure. See "Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures" section in the 10-k filed with the SEC. 15 STRATEGY FOR CHANGE Strategy for Change Autoliv's Strategic Framework consists of four elements that directly support our financial and sustainability objectives and targets. Our focus areas require everyone's commitment in order to realize our strategy and meet our objectives and targets: Customer Focus • We create value for the customer by creating a fit between the customer need and our offering Competitive Products and Solutions • Develop competitive products and solutions to meet the identified customer needs • Create efficient processes and actively manage our portfolio to deliver on our profitability targets Efficient Value Delivery • We align our value chain to ensure value is delivered to our customers at the right time, in the right place, at the right cost and with the right capital intensity The Autoliv Way • The Autoliv Way gives us a common view of what great looks like at Autoliv and how we get there 16 PROFITABLE & CAPITAL EFFICIENT GROWTH The Autoliv Way 17 STRATEGY FOR CHANGE Customer Focus Strengthening Our Position in a Changing Market Our strategy, business priorities and targets are deeply rooted in the growing global demand for traffic safety. 1.2 million lives are lost annually on the roads according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Vulnerable road users – pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists – make up about half of these fatalities. Road traffic accidents are a ma- jor cause of death among all age groups and the leading cause of death for children and young adults between the ages of 5 and 29. In addition, tens of millions suffer non- fatal traffic-related injuries, causing not only human suffer- ing, but also costs corresponding to about 10% of GDP in a majority of countries. This underlines the importance of our commitment to save more lives and reduce the num- ber of injuries on our roads. Market development The automotive safety market is driven by two fundamen- tal factors: Light Vehicle Production (LVP) and safety con- tent per vehicle (CPV). In the long term, new technologies such as autonomous driving and drivetrain electrification are expected to have positive effects on the safety con- tent per vehicle. With advanced protective systems for new flexible seating positions, safety integration in seats, human-machine interface (HMI) in steering wheels, and protection systems outside the vehicle for vulnerable road users, there is an increasing need for innovations in safety systems. In the medium-term, content per vehicle is expected to grow mainly due to increased government reg- ulations and test rating requirements in growth markets, as well as from higher installation rates of knee airbags, front-center airbags, more advanced steering wheels and more advanced seatbelt systems in more mature markets. Market position Our long-term focus on quality, delivery and cost in eve- rything we do is the foundation for our long-term success. We have been involved in only around 2% of recalls of air- bags and seatbelts in the last 10 years, an important indi- cator that we are delivering on our quality strategy. Since 2017, our market share has increased by 7 percentage points to 45% in 2023. Our market position is strong in all product categories, with 47% in airbags, 45% in seatbelts and 40% in steering wheels. All three product categories have substantially improved their positions since 2017. All of our largest regions have increased their market shares since 2017, to 48% in Americas, 50% in Europe, 36% in China and 44% in Asia excluding China. Global Light Vehicle Production LVP has increased at an average annual growth rate of 1.9% since 1997. However, global LVP has declined from the peak of 92 million in 2017, to 87 million in 2023. We expect that light vehicle production will continue to grow both in the medium and long-term. The growth is expected to take place in all regions. With many regions having al- ready rebuilt vehicle inventories, we see a short-term light vehicle production outlook that is more reliant on end-cus- tomer demand. 18 Safety Content Per Vehicle A global development towards increased safety stand- ards with stricter regulations and increasingly stringent rating frameworks is a strong driver of safety content in vehicles. Other drivers are the premium vehicle trend and the increasing focus on safety in medium- and low- income markets. By continuously researching, develop- ing and introducing new technologies with higher value- added features, Autoliv can influence safety content per vehicle. In 2023, global average CPV increased to around $261. As a result of the increase, the automo- tive safety market has outgrown LVP historically and we expect this trend to continue. Since 2017, CPV has in- creased in all regions, except in Japan, due to currency effects. In recent years, India introduced regulations leading to mandatory frontal airbags for all new models, and most vehicle manufacturers has also decided to make side airbag systems standard on future vehicles. Competitive landscape Although Autoliv is the undisputed leader in automotive safety, we face a variety of competitors in a landscape that is constantly evolving. We consider our key competitors to be ZF and Joyson Safety Systems (JSS), which we regard as global, full-scope competitors. ZF is a broad-based au- tomotive supplier. JSS was formed through the combina- tion of KSS and Takata and is owned by Ningbo Joyson Electronic. In Japan, Brazil, South Korea and China, we also compete with a number of domestic suppliers, often with close ties to domestic vehicle manufacturers. We also face competition from product specialists. Global Industry Leader 1) Market Share by Product Area1) 45% Airbags 47% Seatbelts 45% Steering wheels 40% Autoliv global market share Content per Vehicle1) US$ per vehicle Competitive Landscape 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Average 2023: ~$261 Global Full Scope China Challengers OEM Associated Product Specialists NA WEU Japan EEU China India 2023 2017 1) Company estimates. Includes seatbelts, airbags, steering wheels and pedestrian safety. 19 STRATEGY FOR CHANGE Customer Focus Customer Collaboration Building on a long history of collaboration with OEMs, Autoliv has one of the industry’s most diverse customer bases, re- flecting a strong sales mix with high-volume global vehicle manufacturers, global premium brands, as well new entrants to the automotive industry. Technology-driven trends are disrupting the automotive industry, necessitating collabora- tion to address the challenges and opportunities that the in- dustry is facing, notably connectivity, automation, emissions and safety. In 2023, Autoliv announced partnerships with three leading Chinese vehicle manufacturers to address opportunities and challenges in the rapidly evolving global automotive landscape. Autoliv currently delivers products to around 100 vehicle brands around the world and has a leading market position with almost all OEMs. During 2023, we launched a record number of new products on a number of important electric vehicles (EVs) and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICE), supporting our future growth. around 31% of our global sales, compared to their 29% share of global LVP. This is a result of our high order intake with Japanese OEMs in recent years, built on our strong lo- cal presence in Japan and our global manufacturing foot- print. Globally, European-based brands accounted for 29% of our sales in 2023. U.S.-based brands (including Chrysler and new EV OEMs) accounted for 23% of our global sales, while domestic Chinese OEMs accounted for around 6% of our sales in 2023. The fastest growing customer in 2023 was Honda followed by a global EV manufacturer and Toyota. The Company estimates that its sales in 2023 for EVs (not including plug-in hybrid vehicles) amounted to around $1.4 billion. The positive sales trend for EVs is expected to continue as around 45% of our total order intake in 2023 was for future EVs. Additionally, we have been successful in winning contracts with new automakers. New automakers, mainly in North America and China, accounted for around 25% of our order intake, up from 12% just two years ago. Sales by customer and vehicle type In 2023, our top five customers represented 48% of sales and the ten largest represented 78% of sales. This reflects the concentration in the automotive industry. The five larg- est customers in 2023 accounted for 46% of global Light Vehicle Production (LVP) and the ten largest for 66%. The top ten customer list includes many of the major Asian ve- hicle manufacturers as well as one pure EV manufacturer. Asian vehicle producers have steadily become increasingly important, mainly driven by growth among Japanese and Chinese OEMs. As a group, Japanese OEMs now represent Sales by region With operations in 25 countries and having one of the broad- est customer bases of any automotive supplier, Autoliv has the best global footprint in the industry. In 2023, the Asian market, the China and Asian divisions combined, accounted for 39% of Autoliv's sales. The second largest market was Americas, representing 34% of sales. The European mar- ket accounted for 27% of sales in 2023, which is roughly 10 percentage points less than a decade ago, reflecting a weak LVP as well as our strong market share gains in Asia and North America over the past few years. 20 Sales by Product Sales by Customer Sales by Division Nissan /Mitsubishi/Renault 10% Others 9% 67% 33% Stellantis 10% VW 9% Honda 9% Subaru 2% Volvo 2% BMW 3% Mercedes 4% EV Maker 5% Americas 34% Chinese OEMs 6% General Motors 6% Asia 19% Europe 27% China 20% Airbags and Steering Wheels Seatbelts Toyota 9% Ford 7% Hyundai/Kia 7% Japan 8% China 21% Americas 33% 27% Important Launches in 2023 Fisker Ocean Xpeng P7i Wey Blue Ocean Dodge Ram Rampage Toyota Alphard Zeekr X BMW i5/5-series Nio ES 6 Hyundai MUFASA 21 STRATEGY FOR CHANGE Competitive Products and Solutions Products for Saving More Lives Based on our extensive research into real-life accidents, we develop and engineer automotive safety solutions to save more lives and prevent injuries on the roads. What sets us apart from our competitors is the Autoliv Circle of Life, a research-based approach to Saving More Lives in real-life situations. INTEGRATED CHILD BOOSTER SEAT Provides protection and comfort 1 The integrated booster seat is specially designed to provide safety for children, together with the car's seatbelt. SIDE AIRBAG Protects in side collisions 2 Side airbags reduce the risk of chest injuries by approximately 25%. With dual-chamber side airbags, both the pelvis and the chest areas are protected which further reduces the risk of serious injuries in side-impact crashes. KNEE AIRBAG Reduces leg injuries 3 Knee airbags, which deploy from a vehicle’s lower dashboard, distribute the impact forces on an occupant's legs, thereby reducing leg and knee injuries. Additionally, they are designed to control the movement of the occupant so that the driver and passenger airbags can provide optimal protection. Reduces pedestrian head injuries 4 ACTIVE HOOD LIFTER Active hood lifters help to mitigate the impact of a pedestrian's head against the structure beneath the hood, meaning the engine, suspension, etc. 22 5 SEATBELT Top life-saving device Seatbelts are considered the primary restraint system, because of their vital role in occupant safety, and can reduce fatalities by as much as 45%. 6 FRONT CENTER AIRBAG Enhances front-row protection Front center airbag can prevent front-row passengers from colliding with each other during side impacts. 7 SIDE-CURTAIN AIRBAG Reduces head injuries Reduces the risk of life threatening head injuries by approximately 50%. 8 DRIVER AND PASSENGER AIRBAG Saves lives and reduces injuries The driver airbag reduces fatalities in frontal crashes by approximately 25% (for belted drivers) and reduces serious head injuries by over 60%. 9 STEERING WHEEL With the lives of others in your hands The steering wheel is a vital part of the safety system and controls many of the vehicle’s functions. 10 PEDESTRIAN AIRBAG Protects pedestrians The pedestrian airbag aims to mitigate and reduce the severity of a head impact in case of a pedestrian-vehicle accident. 11 PYRO SAFETY SWITCH Prevents fire and electrocution Pyro safety switches can disconnect or cut power during/after an accident. 23 STRATEGY FOR CHANGE Competitive Products and Solutions Innovation as an Enabler to Save More Lives The Bernoulli AirbagTM – our innovative and costefficient solution for very large airbags. At Autoliv, we are accelerating our innova- tion agenda which is shaped by industry megatrends, key industry technology and product development. A major focus area is new occupant safety solutions driven by the evolution of advanced driver assistance systems and new interiors. Shifting demographics, sustainability, and fast develop- ment of new technology will shape our industry’s future, and global megatrends like automation, electrification, and con- nectivity are changing and influencing the future transport system. Our understanding of these trends, paired with our approach to Real Life Safety, enables us to embrace and influence the new horizons in mobility. As trends and new technologies reshape the mobility landscape, staying com- petitive requires disruptive strategies – and innovation. Our research and innovation capability allow our develop- ment teams to redefine the standards of safety for future challenges such as electrified and autonomous cars and create specially designed safety procucts for motorcyclists and cyclists. The Autoliv Circle of Life The Autoliv Circle of Life is a research-based approach to Saving More Lives in real-life situations, beyond standard- ized test scenarios. This means that instead of using the ex- isting pre-defined load cases, Autoliv conducts traffic safety research to verify or develop new test methods and tools to continuously push the agenda of road safety. The effect of new innovations is estimated from real life data and can later be verified. This research-based approach has enabled Autoliv to be a leader in automotive safety. The Bernoulli Airbag™ Autoliv’s research-based approach, paired with Swiss mathematician and physicist Daniel Bernoulli's fundamen- tal principles of fluid dynamics, has resulted in a revolution- ary new passenger airbag. This new technology can inflate very large airbags, like the ones needed in newer electric ve- hicles with roomier cockpits and comfortable seating, with a smaller single stage inflator. The Bernoulli Airbag™ is an example of our commit- ment to saving lives and redefining the standards of safety so our customers can build the safest possible vehicles. By doing this, we can affect other aspects of the safety system and offer our customers options that do not exist today. The Bernoulli Airbag™ is a significant step forward in making vehicles safer in a more efficient and sustainable manner. 24 Real Life Safety Autoliv has a research-based approach to Saving More Lives in real-lite situations. This approach has allowed us to be a leader in automotive safety for 70 years. Start of Production Once validated, these new technologies move into the Autoliv produc- tion system. Real Life Safety Start of Production Crash Statistics on a Macro Level Validation of New Safety Systems We then validate the feasibility of these technologies in real-life traffic situations. Developing New Test Methods Continued research also drives us to develop new methods for testing real-life safety technologies. Validation of New Safety Systems for Real-Life Traffic The Autoliv Circle of Life for Traffic Safety © Copyright Autoliv Inc. All rights reserved. In-Depth Studies of Crashes and Incidents Developing New Test Methods Biomechanics and Human Factors Finding the Best Technology for Safety Needs Crash Statistics on a Macro Level Autoliv's research team gath- ers and analyzes Real Life Safety statistics on a global level to understand traffic crashes. ln-Depth Studies of Accidents and Incidents Autoliv partners with leading safety institutions to study traffic crashes, their causes and outcomes. Biomechanics and Human Factors Autoliv is a global leader in understanding how biomechanics and driver behavior affect safety in real-life traffic conditions. Finding the Best Technology Our research allows us to develop technologies that meet the needs of real-life traffic situations for all people. Developing safety for mobility and society Our innovation agenda supports our evolution into safety for mobility and society. Autoliv’s Mobility Safety Solutions (MSS) utilizes our research and technology to develop products and services for businesses adjacent to Autoliv’s core areas of airbags, steering wheels, and seatbelts for light passenger vehicles. Such adjacent products and ser- vices include electrical safety solutions with our pyrotech- nical safety switches, safety solutions for commercial ve- hicles, and providing components to customers outside of light vehicle markets. Motorcycles and bikes The number of motorcycles and bikes in the world con- tinues to rise. In many regions, they offer an affordable way to travel and in other parts of the world they are used for convenience or leisure. Motorcycle and bike riders have not benefited to the same extent as car occupants from the many developments in vehicle safety. Today, some motor- cycles are equipped with advanced safety systems, but there is a need for more safety products. Autoliv's exten- sive research into motorcycle and bike riding behavior and crashes has resulted in two sets of solutions: on-vehicle safety solutions and on-rider safety solutions (wearables). Our first product to reach the market will be an on-motor- cycle airbag system, which is planned to go into production for the first customer in 2025, that can improve rider pro- tection in frontal and oblique crashes. Our goal is to offer a complete and cost-efficient airbag system, that can improve rider protection in front and oblique crashes, to facilitate the introduction of this technology for a wide variety of motorcy- cles. The Autoliv airbag system will include an airbag and an in-house-developed electronic crash sensor. UNRSF collaboration – accelerating road safety progress in low- and middle-income countries Autoliv's global presence, in-depth knowledge of how peo- ple are injured, and effective solutions are all highly valu- able assets to support progress towards the global road safety targets. Since 2022, Autoliv supports the UN Road Safety Fund (UNRSF), which is the lead agency in charge of coordinating funding and deployment of road safety projects in low- and middle-income countries. Autoliv supports the UNRSF financially and with expertise to stimulate and guide global efforts to improve road safety policies, technical regula- tion, and safe system capacities. Autoliv has built strong cred- ibility among policymakers and key road safety stakeholders, as demonstrated by the election of Autoliv's CEO Mikael Bratt to the Advisory Board of the UNRSF. Through the col- laboration with UNRSF, Autoliv has gained greater access to the highest level of political forums and a stronger voice in the prioritization of policy actions to reach the Sustainable 25 STRATEGY FOR CHANGE Competitive Products and Solutions Inflatable Helmet Concept for Bike Riders Airbag System on Motorbike Integrated Seat Airbag for "Zero Gravity" Pyrotechnical Safety Switches Development Goals by 2030. As motorcycle safety is a high priority in low- and middle-income countries, Autoliv will focus its attention on efforts that drive progress in motorcycle safety and rider protection and continue to advocate for substantial enhancements to the safety of vulnerable road users. Equity in vehicle road safety – the SAFER Human Body Model Autoliv is a forerunner in road safety equity. Current occu- pant substitutes used for estimating injury risk in crash test- ing are limited to three sizes representing small, mid-size and large occupants, and are based on 1970s U.S. popula- tion height and weight distributions. In an effort to change this, Autoliv has been working with finite element human body models since 2008. These virtual representations of humans with bones and flesh are much more detailed than traditional crash test dummies. Together with SAFER, an open research arena for vehicle and traffic safety, our SAFER Human Body Model (HBM) can be morphed seam- lessly to represent any weight and height – for both males and females. The work culminated in a PhD thesis in 2023 on Human Body Model Morphing for Assessment of Crash Rib Fracture Risk for the Population of Car Occupants. There are various projects, both ongoing and planned, to make our SAFER HBM ever better. As presented at the 27th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) in Yokohama, Japan in April 2023, SAFER HBM can today predict human kinematics and injury risk for various human shapes and road user types. Assessing injury risk for a diverse population in a range of crashes will promote more personalized safety solutions for car occupants as well as for vulnerable road users. Electrical safety solutions With the further electrification of society, new innovative solutions are required to enable a safe transition to a more sustainable future. Utilizing Autoliv’s competence from our core business, we have developed several different products for electrical safety, with the common denomina- tor being utilization of pyrotechnics. The products range from highvolume, off-the-shelf products, primarily the Pyro Safety Switch, to tailor-made solutions. Today, most of our products for electrical safety target the automotive industry, but we also see potential to grow in new markets such as electricity transmission and energy storage. The triple helix model of innovation at Autoliv An ever-changing world presents us with challenges, and we cannot solve all problems ourselves. For Autoliv, collab- oration is a success factor. We often collaborate according 26 Low Carbon Footprint Cushions Steering Wheels with Multi-Zone Hands-on-Detection Belt in Seat The Bernoulli Airbag™ to the triple helix model of innovation, which refers to the open collaborative spirit between academia, industry, and government, and aims to foster economic and social devel- opment. Cross-sector collaboration ensures that the engine of private sector innovation is pointed in the right direction – towards targets with the greatest societal benefit, leveraging the opportunities of technology. Autoliv strategically choos- es its partners to develop its innovative capabilities, differen- tiate itself from its competitors, and become more efficient in manufacturing. Collaboration is an enabler to save more lives and creates growth and profitability for Autoliv. Autoliv has a global research and innovation network and specific research collaborations with world-leading uni- versities within biomechanics, human factors, and data sci- ence. We partner with universities, research institutes and policymakers, engaging with innovative start-ups and other industrial partners to innovate, develop and produce scal- able and quick-to-market safety innovations. Collaboration Industry partners Academia Policy Makers Innovative Capabilities Future Advantages Differentiating Capabilities Competitive Advantages Operational Capabilities Efficiency, Quality and Standardization Saving More Lives From 35,000 to 100,000 lives annually Growth Outgrowing the market New products and services New businesses 27 STRATEGY FOR CHANGE Efficient Value Delivery Operational Excellence Mega trends Market insights Safety research Autoliv strategy We align our value chain to ensure value is delivered to our customers at the right time, in the right location, with the right quality, at the right cost and with the right capital intensity. RD&E Effectiveness We are enhancing our engineering productivity through the Engineering 4.0 program. This program is aimed at streamlining our processes through different initiatives, such as one flow of project data and virtual engineering to optimize part and product development and to reduce prototype and testing. Furthermore, our engineering pro- cesses are made more efficient through digitalization, au- tomation and smart connectivity. Robust and competitive end-to-end supply chain The success of Autoliv is dependent on competitive and innovative suppliers and partners who are successful in their respective businesses. During the past years the global trade system has suf- fered from shortages, wars, natural disasters and geopo- litical tensions. This has required focus on building a cost- and capital efficient supply chain which at the same time is resilient, adaptive and sustainable. Autoliv will continue to combine commercial supplier initiatives, development of our supply chain and supplier portfolio with improved change management. This is central for our ability to continuously reduce product cost. We are identifying core and non-core processes in our make vs. buy studies and developing relevant associated strategies. Our supply chain has improved and reinforced its End-to-End and cross-functional abilities to reduce costs pre and post start of production. Quality assured projects with seamless launches We see increasing complexity and functionality of our products, in combination with shorter develop time expec- tations from our customers. To meet customer require- ments while achieving profitable and sustainable launches into serial production, we are strengthening the focus on proactive quality assurance, profitability improvement and program management capability. Cost reductions through operational excellence and optimized footprint Benchmark manufacturing in Autoliv will ensure that our manufacturing operations operate at benchmark levels. We will continue to drive our Autoliv Production System (APS), aiming for a top rating for all plants. We have al- ready raised a meaningful number of our plants to a top rating. APS principles are also be expanded to other non- manufacturing areas. We have developed a roadmap for our Manufacturing 4.0 program and will accelerate our path to the connected factory. Further, we are reviewing and optimizing our manufacturing and technical center footprint. We continously evaluate our footprint to be able to meet the customers demands and remain competitive. 28 Feedback loop for continuous improvement Built in Quality throughout the product lifecycle for Zero Defects at target cost Our products save lives. They do not get a second chance. Therefore, we have a Zero Defect mindset that empha- sizes the importance of getting things right the first time. It aims to eliminate defects, improve product or service quality, and reduce costs associated with waste. We work to build in quality in all dimensions across the product life- cycle, with the total cost and End-to-End process in mind. Operational excellence at Autoliv seatbelt plant in Tsukuba, Japan. 29 STRATEGY FOR CHANGE Efficient Value Delivery Value to Customers Every year, we compete in several hundred tenders for new business. To remain the pre- ferred choice for our customers, we work dili- gently with quality, reliability, technology and flexibility. This is, and has been, instrumental in building our brand and business over the last 70 years. The trust our customers have in Autoliv is further sup- ported by incorporating sustainability into everything we do. We are uniquely positioned to benefit from the industry transformation. Our ability to consistently outperform mar- ket growth is rooted in a strong focus on innovation, quality and a superior production system serving around 100 car brands globally. To ensure that we maintain and strengthen our position as the industry leader, we have developed a number of strategies. Brand Strength We are committed to further strengthening the visibility and recognition of the Autoliv brand. In a fast-changing world, company reputation and public responsibility are increas- ingly important to all stakeholders and can have a direct influence and impact on commercial potential. A strong Autoliv brand is equally important as we develop our new adjacent business areas. Based on our proven market suc- cess, we are taking further steps to increase our visibility beyond our current customer strongholds. Sustainability The automotive industry is undergoing a major transforma- tion, as sustainability becomes a defining issue for car buy- ers as well as governments and regulators. Our sustain- ability approach of Saving More Lives, safe and inclusive workplace, climate and circularity and responsible busi- ness is aligned with and supports our customers' broader sustainability agendas. Innovation (i) Our ability to consistently outperform market growth is de- pendent on our ability to provide new safety technologies. We have accelerated our innovation agenda, focusing on key industry technology and product trends. A major focus area is new passive safety solutions driven by the evolu- tion of new interiors for electrical and self-driving vehicles. Quality Leadership (Q5) Continued focus on quality is imperative for remaining the preferred choice of our customers. Accordingly, we are committed to delivering the highest quality, safety and per- formance in our products and services, in alignment with our vision of Saving More Lives. We continue to invest in our quality culture and Zero Defect mindset. We are adapt- ing our processes to incorporate quality earlier in the de- sign process and cooperate more closely with suppliers to further improve our Zero Defect performance by applying our Q5 methodology – quality in all dimensions. One Product One Process (1P1P) 1P1P is Autoliv’s journey towards a global standardization of products and processes. Its main objective is to create lower total cost by reduction of complexity through global management of knowledge. We thereby ensure the best technical solutions (product robustness), providing higher value for our customers (customer excellence). Essen- tially, the idea is that there should be only one process for every product and one product for every function. Autoliv Production System (APS) APS is how we stay competitive and grow towards excel- lence in our daily work. It contributes to every single part of Autoliv and it is particularly central to manufacturing. APS is the backbone of how we drive operations across our pro- duction network. Combined with digitalization of manufac- turing and automation of processes, we are continuously progressing our operational excellence journey. 30 APS 31 STRATEGY FOR CHANGE The Autoliv Way Outstanding People Embracing Change Our position as a worldwide leader in auto- motive safety systems, saving 35,000 lives every year, is achieved by our 70,000 out- standing colleagues around the world. Their diverse assets, breadth and depth of exper- tise and desire to develop, in combination with Autoliv’s ambition to enable fulfilling careers, supports our vision of Saving More Lives. Guided by our vision, 2023 was a dynamic year for Autoliv, with both highlights and challenging moments for our col- legues. Examples include the global celebration of Auto- liv’s 70th anniversary, during which our colleagues’ passion and pride in the company was clear, as well as the improve- ment and cost reduction activities carried out during the year, including reducing positions and closing some of our facilities. People development We want all our colleagues to achieve professional success and reach their full potential. This creates a clear win-win situation since we need high-performing people doing their utmost to deliver on our vision and safeguarding our market leading position. Key components of this continuous ambi- tion include Speak Up (page 55), our strategic workforce planning where we identify talent requirements, gaps and strategies to enable people to grow, and our Key Behaviors (page 10), which remind us all how to act to bring the best version of Autoliv to life every day. The dialogue between managers and team members, which includes all of these components, is a cornerstone of everyone’s growth. This dialogue is summarized in an an- nual Performance and Development Dialogue (PDD). Dur- ing 2023, 99% of targeted employees conducted a PDD with their managers. To further support our people’s growth, we use several de- velopment channels, such as facilitated and self-paced development programs, technical and specialist career paths, international assignments and continuous on-the- job training. Health and safety Ensuring a safe workplace is a top priority for us and our goals are clear: we want zero accidents, and we want to prevent all occupational injuries. Autoliv’s management is strongly committed to providing safe and healthy working conditions for all our employees and contractors, and we work actively to make health and safety an integrated part of our daily work, on all levels and across functions. Just like our vision, Saving More Lives, ensuring a safe work en- vironment is a collective achievement. In 2023, we contin- ued our safety leadership training and performed general awareness-raising activities as well as activities with a par- ticular focus on high-risk tasks. Diversity and inclusion Our workforce reflects the diversity of the countries and cultures in which we operate. The more diverse our organi- zation, the better we will be at anticipating, leveraging, and adapting to future needs and changes. We believe that eve- ryone should be respected and treated fairly, and we are committed to providing an inclusive and diverse workplace where everyone can be their authentic selves and deliver results. Inclusive ways of working are a fundamental part of our Key Behaviors. Labor rights We strive to offer fair terms and conditions of employment. Our Key Behaviors, Code of Conduct, talent development strategies and employment policies support the principles in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Labour Organization’s Funda- mental Principles and Labour Standards. 32 33 SUSTAINABILITY A Driving Force in Sustainable Mobility Our sustainability approach is designed to create long-term stakeholder value by focus- ing on the most material areas supported by long-term ambitions and concrete targets. Guided by our vision of Saving More Lives, our mission is to provide world-class, life-saving solutions for mobility and society. Sustainability is an integral part of our busi- ness strategy and a fundamental driver for market differ- entiation and stakeholder value creation, helping to ensure that our business will continue to thrive and contribute to sustainable development in the long term. To truly be a driving force in sustainable mobility, we strive to systemati- cally assess and manage key impacts, risks and opportuni- ties to society and the environment related to our business, operations and supply chain. We also engage with our cus- tomers to ensure that we are part of driving the transition to low-carbon and circular mobility, thus realizing new busi- ness potential for us and our customers. Our sustainability approach is based on four focus ar- eas with broad ambitions and more specific short-term targets defined for each area. These areas represent the strongest links to our business risks and opportunities and the greatest impact on key stakeholder groups, society and the environment. All four areas represent global challenges where we believe that our work can make a positive differ- ence, through our ways of working or by inspiring and col- laborating with others. We are a signatory of the UN Global Compact and our work and policies, such as our Code of Conduct, are aligned with international frameworks such as the ILO core conventions and the OECD Guidelines. Our core business and sustainability work contribute to our goal of the realization of a number of UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Our core business contrib- utes to reducing the number of road fatalities (SDG 3) and making transportation systems safer for everyone, includ- ing vulnerable road users (SDG 11). We support research and knowledge sharing that benefit developing markets (SDG 17). Over time, our climate and circularity agenda aims to not only reduce our own negative environmental im- pact (SDG 9, SDG 13) but also help drive green innovation (SDG 12) among direct material suppliers, vehicle manu- facturers and energy providers (SDG 7). By proactively managing health and safety risks and labor rights (SDG 8), promoting diversity and inclusion (SDG 5) and holding all employees to the highest ethical business standards (SDG 16), we lay the foundation for a high-performing organiza- tion where every employee has the means to speak up and drive improvement. For more information about performance data, defini- tions, etc., see the Sustainability Appendix on pages 59-63. 34 Focus Area Targets and Ambitions Contribution to UN Sustainable Development Goals Saving More Lives 100,000 lives saved per year A Safe and Inclusive Workplace • Zero accidents • Embrace inclusive ways of working Climate and Circularity • Carbon neutrality in own operations by 2030 • Net zero emissions across our supply chain by 2040 Responsible Business • Proactively prevent corruption and other unethical business practices • Respect human rights • Manage supply chain sustainability risks 35 SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability Materiality Assessment An integrated approach to assessing the impacts, risks and opportunities of our busi- ness allows us to focus on managing the most material topics. The starting point for sustainability management and report- ing is understanding our most material topics. Our materi- ality assessment process aims to identify the key sustain- ability topics in our own operations and our value chain. The process is based on the double materiality principle: both impact materiality (how Autoliv impacts people and the en- vironment) and financial materiality (how various sustain- ability topics impact Autoliv) are considered. The materiality assessment process is aligned with the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process with activities carried out continuously throughout the year. We continu- ously develop our materiality assessment process to align with future management and reporting requirements. Assessment activities during the year included: • Cross-functional workshops with internal topic experts and representatives from key functions to ensure a broad inside-out understanding of current and future material topics • Review of industry-related reports etc. regarding im- pacts, risks and opportunities • Market research as well as direct dialogue to understand our customers’ sustainability priorities, challenges and opportunities for collaboration • Review of investor-driven sustainability/ESG assess- ments as well as meetings with key shareholders • Review of the results of the quarterly employee surveys and reports filed through the Autoliv Helpline and other Speak Up channels For many topics, we also carry out topic-specific assess- ments to gain a deeper understanding of both impact and financial materiality. For example, for climate change, we have carried out a value chain GHG footprint assessment, identified emission sources and reduction levers, and identi- fied key transition and physical risks and opportunities that could impact our business. Sustainability impacts and performance of our supply chain cut across most of the above topics, in particular re- garding climate change, circularity, product safety, health and safety, labor rights and business ethics. While many of the topics listed above have been con- sidered as material for several years, some topics such as inclusion and circularity are growing in importance driven by trends of natural resources scarcity, digitalization, more complex operating environments and new legislation. The material topics are covered by our sustainability focus ar- eas, with targets and action plans defined to ensure that we make measurable progress. 36 In 2023, key material topics identified included: Environment Social Climate change Circularity Life-saving products and innovations Product safety Health and safety Inclusion Labor rights Governance Anti-corruption Antitrust Shaping the industry agenda Autoliv is engaged in several global and regional associa- tions and organizations, as well as academic and public- private partnerships, in order to contribute actively to driv- ing progress in our most material areas. Autoliv is an active member of committees that shape the organizations’ posi- tions and communication on key topics such as furthering traffic and vehicle safety standards in regulations and rat- ings, equity in crash safety, and how the automotive supplier industry can actively drive low-carbon mobility. Moreover, Autoliv is actively engaging to contribute to the resilience of the automotive supplier sector, to encourage enhancements in national and international traffic and vehi- cle safety standards, research funding and capacity, advo- cating for greater priority to road traffic safety in global policy and national legislation as well as how the industry can sup- port the transition towards low-carbon mobility. Examples of some of the organizations Autoliv is a mem- ber of include: • Since 2022, Autoliv is a Board member of the UN Road Safety Fund (UNRSF) Advisory Board. UNRSF’s aim is to promote road safety in developing countries in order to meet Sustainable Development Goal 3.6 of halving road traffic fatalities by 2030. Autoliv is advising the UNRSF about its direction and operational work. Through its part- nership with the UNRSF, Autoliv has been able to work more actively on the global policy level and communicate its recommendations, and to directly support the UN- funded initiatives carried out in low- and middle-income countries, both financially and with our expertise. • • In the U.S., the Automotive Safety Council (ASC) focus- es on promoting global deployment of automotive safety technology. ASC is active in providing industry guidance on road traffic safety-related legislation. In Europe, Autoliv is actively engaged in a number of working groups of the European Association of Auto- motive Suppliers (CLEPA). Much of the work relates to shaping future safety regulations as well as industry’s role in the EU sustainability agenda through collabora- tion with other automotive suppliers on topics such as circularity, the EU Taxonomy, corporate sustainability due diligence and reporting. 37 SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability Governance Autoliv’s sustainability work is managed within a well-defined governance structure, with clearly established ownership and re- sponsibilities at all levels in the organization. The underlying principle of our governance model is in- tegrating sustainability responsibilities into the ordinary course of business and company processes. This means that the ultimate responsibility for executing sustainability activities and targets lies with the line organization and is monitored through management reporting. According to our Key Behaviors, we expect every employee to take owner- ship of sustainability topics by proactively contributing im- provement ideas as well as by following company policies and standards. Ultimate oversight of the company’s sustainability ac- tivities lies with the Board of Directors. The Board sets the direction for sustainability activities and regularly monitors progress on Autoliv’s sustainability strategy and targets through its Nominating and Corporate Governance Com- mittee (NCGC). The Board reviews and approves the Code of Conduct as well as the Annual and Sustainability Report and the Modern Slavery Act Statement. Implementation responsibility for sustainability lies with the Executive Management Team (EMT). The EMT has appointed a Sustainability Board charged with providing regular direction and oversight. The Sustainability Board consists of the CEO and other EMT members and meets on a quarterly basis. The Sustainability Board reviews and approves Autoliv’s sustainability strategy, annual and long- term plans, targets and policies for key topics, and monitors implementation and performance. Integration of sustainability into Autoliv’s business is led by the HR & Sustainability function. The Vice President, Sustainability, who reports to the Executive Vice President, HR & Sustainability, coordinates, develops and monitors Autoliv’s sustainability agenda and facilitates the Sustain- ability Board meetings and other sustainability-related re- porting to management. Everyday sustainability topics are managed, as appropriate, by the HR & Sustainability func- tion, divisions and other corporate functions such as supply chain management, research, development and engineer- ing, and legal and compliance. Divisions and corporate functions have dedicated sustainability resources such as climate coordinators, health & safety coordinators, eco-de- sign/life-cycle assessment (LCA) experts and supply chain sustainability specialists. Risk management Autoliv has a global risk management organization and utilizes several different tools, such as an enterprise risk management (ERM) framework which includes annual, di- visional, functional and corporate risk mapping activities, monitoring of risk trends, implementation of risk improve- ment plans and follow-up of the effectiveness of risk miti- gation measures. Risk reporting is carried out on a regular basis to the Board of Directors and the Audit and Risk Com- mittee. With regard to sustainability-related risks, the ERM framework takes into consideration the double materiality perspective. This means assessing both how Autoliv’s op- erations impact people and the environment, and how vari- ous sustainability topics impact Autoliv’s business. Sustain- ability risks, such as product safety, climate change, natural resources scarcity, environmental compliance, health and safety and other labor rights, business ethics, business conduct and supply chain sustainability, are included in the ERM framework. We assess how sustainability relates to business risks, such as legal proceedings, regulatory changes, contingent liabilities, supply chain disruptions and operational disrup- tions. Furthermore, there are relevant corporate standards for topics such as site risk management, loss prevention, emergency procedures, business contingency planning and physical security. A more detailed description of Autoliv’s material operational, strategic and financial risks, including sustainability-related risks, can be found in the “Risk Fac- tors” and “Risks and Risk Management” sections of the 10-K filed with the SEC. More information on climate-related risks can be found in the TCFD disclosure, on pages 48-49. 38 Sustainability Governance Board of Directors Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Executive Management Team Sustainability Board EVP, HR & Sustainability VP, Sustainability Organization Functions Divisions All employees 39 SUSTAINABILITY Ambition: Road Safety – a Global Challenge 100,000 Lives saved per year 2023 outcome: 35,000 lives saved More than 450,000 injuries reduced As the global leader in automotive safety, our core business, supported by multi-level stakeholder engagement, is making a signif- icant contribution to global road safety. When the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were launched, road safety was made a global priority for good reason: according to the WHO global status report on road safety 2023, around 1.2 million people die in traffic in- cidents every year, a figure likely to increase significantly un- less disruptive action is taken. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death among young people between the ages of 5 and 29. As well as being a public health problem, road traffic injuries carry a huge cost for society: according to some estimates, the global macroeconomic cost of road traffic in- juries is around 10% of global GDP. Many families are driven into poverty by the loss of a breadwinner or by the expenses of prolonged medical care. In August 2020, the UN General Assembly adopted the resolution "Improving global road safety", proclaiming the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021-2030. The target, represented as SDG 3.6, is to reduce road traf- fic deaths and injuries by at least 50% by 2030. According to the resolution, vehicle safety is a key component and member states are encouraged to adopt vehicle safety regulations that make seatbelts, airbags and active safety systems standard equipment. In addition to safer vehicles, infrastructure improvements, road user behavior and pro- tective equipment are also key to achieving the target. Safe System Approach The countries most successful in curbing road traffic injuries apply a Safe System Approach - a combina- tion of five critical factors underpinned by collaboration between key stakeholders: • Safe vehicles • Safe speeds • Safe roads • Safe road user behavior • Post-crash care 40 Share of global population, road traffic deaths, paved inter-urban roads, and registered motor vehicles, by country income level, 2021 9% 16% 13% 8% 43% 32% 44% 35% <1% 28% 38% 34% <1% 2% 10% 88% Population Estimated road fatalities Powered vehicles Paved roads 1) High-income Upper middle-income Lower middle-income Low-income 1) Excludes expressways Our ambition and approach Saving More Lives is our core business and our most im- portant contribution to sustainable development and the realization of SDG 3.6. According to our estimations, our products in use already save 35,000 lives and reduce more than 450,000 injuries every year. Our long-term ambition is for our products to save 100,000 lives per year. Achieving this ambition is based on: • Retaining our strong market position and continuing to grow in our core business, including increasing content per vehicle. This needs to be done while maintaining the highest level of quality as our products never get a second chance. • Successfully expanding our business in new mobility seg- ments aimed at motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians • Proactively broadening the scope of research and devel- opment to also cover a wider range of occupant protec- tion parameters regarding height, weight, age and gender • Increased multi-stakeholder efforts, in particular educa- tion to increase seatbelt use since seatbelts are the most effective way of reducing fatalities and serious injuries Read more about our innovation agenda on pages 24-27. Research and development collaborations We proactively engage with national and international au- thorities as well as academia to further our impact. Below are some examples of our collaborations during 2023. • Research and development for improved motorcyclist safety continued in close dialogue with customers and partners. In addition to in-vehicle solutions, we are also Source: WHO global status report on road safety 2023. exploring how to increase the comfort and safety of per- sonal protective equipment, such as helmets with integrat- ed airbags that provide improved protection of the head and face and inflatable vests that improve protection of the thorax and shoulders. • To reach SDG 3.6, there is a need to accelerate technol- ogy adoption and a Safe System Approach in develop- ing countries. Even though Africa has only a few percent of the total motor vehicles in the world, more than 10% of traffic fatalities globally occur on African roads. Together with a regional Non Governmental Organisation (NGO) and other partners, Autoliv works in the project AfroSAFE to promote the Safe System Approach, build connections with key stakeholders and provide guidance on minimum safety standards. • Autoliv is a member of the multi-stakeholder Research Consortium for Crashworthiness in Automated Driving Systems, which aims to collaboratively work towards vali- dation methods for automated driving systems. We are also part of an Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) consortium on Advanced Vehicle Technology to bet- ter understand and increase safety related to automated driving. • Around 15% of the over 8,000 car occupant fatalities in the EU in 2020 occurred in crashes with Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs). In addition to supporting the Swedish Transport Administration with collision testing, Autoliv en- gaged in research around relevant injury criteria together with University of Virginia and potential protection systems together with Chalmers University of Technology, Volvo AB and the Swedish Transport Administration. 41 SUSTAINABILITY • In 2023, the UN created a working group to revise the UN vehicle safety regulations regarding occupant protection. The group's role is to determine how greater diversity in terms of representation of crashes and occupants should be implemented in crash safety regulations, and to as- sess virtual crash testing as a method to further improve equity in occupant protection. The group gathers around 50 participants and, as a member, Autoliv is actively con- tributing with relevant research findings and know-how. More information about our engagement in industry asso- ciations and other organizations is available in Materiality Assessment on pages 36-37. Collaboration with universities To ensure real-life benefits and to develop evidence-based test methods for product development, Autoliv engages in collaboration with universities globally. One such collabora- tion relates to Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs). Equity in vehicle safety Autoliv is a forerunner in the emerging area of equity in vehicle safety. Current occupant substitutes used for esti- mating injury risk in crash testing are limited to three sizes representing small, mid-size and large occupants, based on 1970’s U.S. population height and weight distributions. The mid-size male has historically been the one most frequently used in rating and regulatory testing. However, over the past decades, there has been a consistent trend of increasing population weight. Car crash injury statistics highlight that both obese male and female occupants are at increased risk of injury and death when compared to average weight males. Beyond sex and size, injury and fatality risks in- crease substantially with age. Autoliv researchers have looked upon safety-belt fit as an important safety aspect for many years, and how safety belts distribute forces on human bodies. Our hypothesis is that the belt system and how it distributes load on the body to protect people can still be developed further, pro- vided that next generation tools and evaluation methods 42 To be able to better protect VRUs, several studies have been initiated during last year with focus on two-wheelers. Current helmet standards and ratings do not consider the complexity of neither facial impact protection performance nor Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Both virtual and physical test methods are being developed and newly developed brain injury assessment tools and injury-specific risk func- tions will be used for evaluation and optimization of safety systems. In this area, we collaborate with the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden, and Imperial College London, and a Swedish helmet manufacturer with the aim of influ- encing standards and ratings. become ready to use and widely accepted. For this rea- son, to enable the development of safety systems that are as effective as possible for everyone, Autoliv is actively researching tools and methods that can be used to repre- sent the contemporary population in different crash sce- narios, for example through virtual crash testing with human body models representing the population variability in age, height, and weight for both males and females. According to research, the seatbelt is the top life-saving device, belts alone reduce occupant fatalities by 45%. 1) Kahane, 2015 Ambitions: Climate and Circularity Carbon neutrality in own operations Net-zero emissions across our supply chain Targets: Carbon neutrality in own operations by 2030 2023 Outcome: 358 kton CO2e Year-on-year improvement in energy intensity Continuous 2023 Outcome: 3% improvement Year-on-year reduction in waste Continuous 2023 Outcome: 12% increase Autoliv’s approach aims to reduce green- house gas (GHG) emissions and increase circular use of materials, also supporting its customers’ transition to lowcarbon friendly mobility. Ambition and approach We are committed to operating our business in an en- into account vironmentally sustainable manner, taking life-cycle of impact throughout the our environmental sourcing, design, production and end of life. Our key en- vironmental impacts are (GHG) emissions, energy use, waste generation and water use. With particular empha- sis on climate action, we actively engage with customers, suppliers and other stakeholders to take on the decarboni- zation challenge across the value chain and drive sustain- able mobility. Environmental management Autoliv’s environmental management system (EMS) em- phasizes continuous improvement and is aligned with ISO 14001 requirements. The EMS establishes the require- ments for a standardized approach to environmental man- agement, including identification of material environmental aspects, objective setting, competence development, per- formance follow-up and standardized reporting. At year end, 92% of all manufacturing facilities were externally certified in accordance with ISO 14001. Climate action In 2021, we launched an updated climate strategy including new long-term climate target and ambition: • Carbon neutrality in own operations by 2030 • Net-zero emissions across our supply chain by 2040 These climate ambitions, aligned with a 1.5°C trajectory, helping to ensure our competitiveness now and in the future. 43 SUSTAINABILITY In addition to these ambitions, we have adopted separate Science Based Targets for 2030 covering our own opera- tions (Scope 1+2) as well as our supply chain (Scope 3 up- stream). More information about the targets is available on page 60. Our GHG footprint To fully understand our GHG footprint as well as key climate- related risks and opportunities, we carried out a value chain GHG footprint assessment and scenario analysis in 2021. The assessment was carried out in accordance with the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Calculation Guidance. Scope 1 + 2 emissions were calculated based on actual operational data covering energy consumption and fugitive emissions,while Scope 3 emissions were modelled based on actual and es- timated sourcing data and generic emission factors. The assessment showed that for the emissions covered by our long-term ambitions, materials used in our production (in particular steel, textiles and other plastics, and magne- sium) were the largest contributors, followed by emissions from logistics and electricity used in our own operations. Downstream Scope 3 emissions, in particular use-phase emissions, constituted the largest share of the total GHG footprint. Since we consider our possibility to reduce down- stream Scope 3 emissions to be greatly limited (such reduc- tions are mainly driven by our customers' work on electrifica- tion), they are excluded from our long-term ambitions and Science Based Target covering Scope 3. Autoliv’s GHG footprint across own operations and our supply chain¹ 2023 (kton CO2e) 3,070 (74%) 460 (11%) 240 (6%) 100 (2%) 260 (6%) 4,130 (100%) Scope 1 Scope 2 Scope 3¹: Purchased goods and services Scope 3¹: Upstream transportation Scope 3¹: Other upstream Total Own operations Upstream activities GHG emissions from fossil fuels and fugitive emissions in operations GHG emissions from purchased electricity, heat and steam in operations GHG emissions from materials used in products and packaging (Scope 3 Category 1) GHG emissions from upstream transportation (Scope 3 Category 4) GHG emissions from business travel, employee commuting and more (Scope 3 Categories 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) 1) Considering the challenges related to accurately modelling upstream Scope 3 emissions, such as the accuracy of historical data and the availability and applicability of emission fac- tors, actual upstream Scope 3 emissions may differ materially from those modelled. The modelling primarily aims to identify the major sources of Scope 3 emissions across the value chain, which supports Autoliv in developing specific activities for improvement and implementing the relevant measures. Autoliv aims to, over time, increase the accuracy of reported upstream Scope 3 emissions by addressing material uncertainties. The illustration above does not include modelled downstream Scope 3 emissions, which include emissions from the use phase of vehicles where Autoliv's products are installed. Autoliv's climate program Based on the results of the GHG footprint assessment, we designed a climate program organized into a number of op- erational initiatives focusing on the most important decar- bonization levers or value creation and enabling activities. A number of cross-cutting initiatives related to governance, performance measurement, business strategy integration, risk management and competence development support the operational initiatives. Guided by our 1.5°C aligned long- term ambitions, the climate program and related processes such as risk assessments represent Autoliv’s low-carbon transition plan. Decarbonization levers The most impactful decarbonization levers identified within our own operations include: • Transitioning to low-carbon electricity at our facilities us- ing a mix of on-site solar generation, long-term Power Purchase Agreements (PPA), Renewable Energy Cer- tificates (REC) and Energy Attribute Certificates (EAC) • Continued focus on energy and materials efficiency • Phasing out current fossil-fuel equipment such as natu- ral gas furnaces with electric alternatives • Phasing out fugitive emissions 44 Low-Carbon1) Supply Chain Low-Carbon1) and Efficient Operations Low-Carbon1) Product Offering Low-carbon electricity in the supply chain Low-carbon material sourcing Low-carbon logistics Energy and resource efficiency Low-carbon product design Phase-down of natural gas equipment Low-carbon sales strategy Elimination of fugitive emissions Renewable energy for operations Cross-Cutting initiatives Program governance and performance measurement Business strategy integration Risk management Organization and compe- tence development Key initiatives that we intend to implement to reach net-zero emissions across our supply chain include: • Transitioning to recycled, bio-based and other low-car- bon materials in our products as well as in packaging • Requiring our suppliers to use low-carbon electricity in their production • Reducing the GHG footprint of our logistics through route, capacity and footprint optimization as well as a shift towards low-carbon transportation modes and ve- hicles Below is a summary of some of the work and key achieve- ments within the program during the year. Low-carbon supply chain In 2023, we carried out our regular climate survey to our direct material suppliers, with the purpose of better under- standing the current situation at our supply base: if suppliers can quantify their GHG emissions, whether they are using re- newable electricity, and whether their climate-related targets and roadmaps are aligned with Autoliv’s net-zero ambition. We also released our Sustainable Sourcing Requirements for direct material suppliers, that include climate-related re- quirements and expectations such as renewable electricity targets by 2024, 2025 and 2030. Low-carbon materials are crucial to meet our GHG emis- sion reduction targets. In 2023, we engaged with a broad range of raw material suppliers on sustainable material solutions, to systematically review and validate options for increasing the recycled content, bio-based and low-carbon materials in our product. Examples covering key materials include: • Textiles: We are assessing low-carbon alternatives based on higher recycled content or bio-based mate- rials, prioritizing new materials interchangeable with currently used materials • Steel: In addition to a fossil-free steel partnership with SSAB, we made progress on a broader low and fossil- free steel buying program • Magnesium: an estimated 20% of purchased magne- sium came from recycled sources, a significant improve- ment from an estimated less than 5% in 2022 In the low carbon logistics program, focus is on shifting transportation from air to sea, optimizing routes and im- proving capacity utilization. During the year, we continued work on developing division-level strategies based on local conditions, and set emissions reduction targets for logistics and packaging. We also carried out successful local pilots in Asia using hydrogen fuel cell and electric light goods vehi- cles as well as low-carbon packaging solutions with biode- gradable bags replacing plastic bags. Low-carbon and efficient operations With a focus on renewable electricity, we expanded purchas- ing of renewable electricity and initiated a long-term solar PPA agreement in the U.S. In 2023, 23% of our total elec- tricity consumption came from renewable instruments, up from 13% in 2022. In addition to renewable electricity instru- ments, several production have installed or are in the pro- cess of installing on-site solar generation capacity. While still representing less than 1% of our total energy consumption, we are working to grow this share over the coming years. As part of our Green Factory Program, we regularly con- duct assessments covering energy, water and waste in order to continuously improve environmental performance in our operations. To ensure better integration of our climate pro- gram into our operations, these assessments were made an integral part of Autoliv’s operational excellence assessment. As part of the program, we set site-level targets for GHG emissions and energy intensity for all manufacturing sites. With a greater focus on energy, we implemented a num- ber of energy efficiency projects in all divisions during the 1) Low-carbon is generally understood as referring to actions/solutions that reduce carbon emissions aligned with limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. 45 SUSTAINABILITY In addition to renewable electricity instruments, many sites have installed or are in the process of installing on-site solar generation capacity. Here represented by Autoliv in Utah, U.S. year, targeting areas such as air compressor leaks, waste heat recovery, installing LED lighting, and replacing older equipment with new, more efficient equipment. We im- proved the operational energy intensity, measured as total energy consumption per part delivered, by 3% compared to 2022. We also conducted energy management workshops and trainings in different divisions. To reduce our GHG emissions from natural gas in the production processes, we undertook several studies and trials to assess the potential for energy efficiency improve- ment, e.g. from gas reduction and heat recovery, and electrification of some equipment. The trials were conduct- ed to ensure that any abatement measures do not compro- mise product quality. Preliminary results showed significant improvement potential for some equipment, to be further assessed and implemented where feasible. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6 ), used in steering wheel pro- duction, is our largest source of fugitive emissions, mak- ing up around 6% of Autoliv’s total Scope 1+2 emissions. We launched an action plan in 2022 to fully phase out the remaining use of SF₆. As a first step, SF₆ emissions were reduced in 2023. Despite an increase in total energy consumption, our ef- forts in particular in increasing renewable electricity use and SF6 phase-out combined with updated emission factors lead to a 17% decrease in Scope 1+2 emissons compared to 2022. Low-carbon product offerings Our ambition is to develop attractive, low-carbon product offerings to support our customers in their transition to zero- emission, low environmental impact vehicles. We are see- ing constantly increasing ambition levels among our cus- tomers who are increasing requirements on us as a supplier. During the year, all product lines developed action plans for net-zero aligned product roadmaps as well as set emis- sions reduction targets. We continued our work to evalu- ate our products’ overall environmental footprint through- out their life cycle. These life-cycle assessments (LCAs) help prioritize actions in product development such as light-weighting and sourcing of low-carbon materials. The LCAs also allow us to proactively engage with customers, highlighting the carbon footprint of our products and how embedded emissions can be reduced. We already offer our customers specific products that support their carbon footprint reduction strategies, such as products with lower weight and higher content of recycled non-ferrous metals and low-carbon polymers. Examples include increased use of recycled magnesium and switching to textile fabrics with a significantly lower GHG footprint. Cross-cutting initiatives During the year, we extended our climate program train- ing to also include mid-level management and employees across divisions and corporate functions. 46 We continued the implementation of our Sustainabil- ity Guidelines for Capex investments, with specific climate impact guidance and assessment. The guidelines aim to ensure that all investments are aligned with our 2030 cli- mate ambitions and specify exclusion criteria for invest- ments that could lead to increased GHG emissions above certain emission thresholds beyond 2030. The guidelines also encourage investments with positive climate impact, such as, installation of solar panels, improvements to ener- gy efficiency, and replacement of fossil-fuel equipment with electric alternatives. To strengthen our capacity for accurate and transparent GHG accounting and forecasting, we are implementing a corporate-wide GHG accounting solution covering both our own operations and Scope 3 upstream activities with focus on direct materials and logistics. The solution enables better product carbon footprinting and target setting, and helps us track both climate and financial impacts of a large number of projects. During the year, we trained and onboarded 340 users across the organization and began tracking over 200 projects. Read more about climate-related governance and risk management in the TCFD disclosure, pages 48-49. Circularity and natural resources Waste and circularity In 2023, we expanded our approach to natural resources management in our own operations and value chain with the aim of implementing a comprehensive circularity approach. We undertook an assessment to evaluate our circularity-re- lated risks and opportunities, in order to set our priorities for the coming years. As part of the assessment, we evaluated our current status and identified a large number of potential circularity initiatives in three key areas: • materials recirculation, including share of recycled content in input materials • materials efficiency, including materials utilization and lightweighting rate • product utilization rate, ensuring the lifetime of our product lasts the lifetime of a vehicle Identified initiatives include, for example, circular prod- uct design principles, scrap optimization in the supply chain and within our operations for key input materials, further improvements in lightweighting, closed loop processes for select materials, increased recycled inputs for strategic materials, and packaging optimization and reuse. The work continues in 2024 with the aim of finalizing our circularity strategy including further validating and prioritizing the op- portunities and risks identified, setting our ambition and de- fining the roadmap. We continuously manage and monitor waste manage- ment practices at site level through the Green Factory pro- gram, in which waste management is part of the quarterly assessment. Directing waste away from landfill remains a priority at our production sites. The rate of reuse, recycling and energy recovery increased to 91% (90% in 2022) of to- tal waste reported. Water Our most water intensive operations are associated with the production of airbag components, accounting for around 60% of water withdrawal. Based on the WRI Aqueduct Wa- ter Risk Atlas, around 20% of Autoliv’s facilities are located in regions with high or extremely high water stress levels. Nevertheless, only one of the ten most water intensive pro- duction sites is located in high water stress region. During the year, we conducted water footprint analysis within our own operations and across key raw materials val- ue chain as well as water risk assessments for our facilities. Based on the ENCORE sectoral water impact methodol- ogy, the largest water footprint in the value chain came from steel, aluminium and textiles (PET). Biodiversity To better understand our impact on biodiversity, we con- ducted an initial assessment on biodiversity risks and de- pendencies, both faced by and associated with our opera- tions, and related to our supply chain. The assessment was based on both the recommended approach from the Task- force for Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) and EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. Using an established methodology (LEAP) and tool (ENCORE), we performed an initial screening of biodiversity risks at all our manufacturing sites and and certain materials value chains. Based on the initial results, we then conducted a more de- tailed assessment of biodiversity impacts and dependen- cies on select Autoliv sites and raw materials supply chains. In 2024, we will continue assessing biodiversity with the overall goal of implementing key aspects into existing pro- cesses such as environmental impact assessments. Materials management and substances of concern For Autoliv as a global automotive component manufac- turer, compliance with chemical and material regulations is essential for our business. At the core is our standard that defines Autoliv's requirements for material data reporting and substance use restrictions, applicable for both Autoliv and its suppliers. This standard is updated twice a year to reflect the latest legal and customer requirements. Through reporting to the automotive industry databases IMDS and CAMDS, we trace the content in our components delivered to customers and confirm compliance regarding applicable legal and customer requirements. We follow up continuously with our suppliers to find al- ternative materials in case a substance needs to be phased out. In 2023, special efforts were devoted to identifying PFAS used in our parts and assessing suitable alternatives. 47 SUSTAINABILITY TCFD Disclosure Autoliv considers the management of cli- mate-related risks and opportunities to be a key component of ensuring long-term busi- ness success. This disclosure is aligned with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. Governance The Board of Directors is ultimately responsible for the over- sight of sustainability-related matters, including climate change, and has delegated certain responsibilities to its committees. The Board of Directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (NCGC) receive regular updates on climate-related matters and perfor- mance. In 2021, the Board of Directors endorsed Autoliv’s current long-term climate ambitions as well as the strategic direction for reaching the ambitions. Throughout 2023, the Board and NCGC received updates on progress related to the climate program and our plans for 2024. The Executive Management Team (EMT) is respon- sible for implementation of sustainability-related matters, including climate change. The Sustainability Board, which consists of the CEO and several EMT members, has over- all operational oversight of Autoliv's climate program. Other relevant Management Boards, such as the Industrial & Prod- uct Board, Innovation Board and Commercial Board, focus on specific climate program initiatives such as low-carbon product design. Performance against climate-related targets is reviewed regularly by the EMT, divisional and other func- tional management teams and followed up in monthly busi- ness reviews. The underlying governance principle of the climate program is close integration into existing govern- ance structures. Supported by the VP Sustainability, the Executive Vice President HR & Sustainability, is ultimately responsible for the overall direction and governance of the program, and for ensuring implementation progress. For more information about sustainability governance, see pages 38-39. Strategy Scenario analysis In 2021, as part of the development of the updated climate strategy, we carried out our first climate scenario analysis. The analysis, which covered both transition and physical risks, was based on a 2°C (equivalent to RCP 4.5) sce- nario and a 3-4°C (equivalent to RCP 8.5) scenario. Transi- tion risks were assessed on a 2030-2040 timeframe, while physical risks were assessed on a 2050 timeframe. From a financial impact perspective, the most material tran- sition risks identified were: • • the risk of a global decrease in overall vehicles sales increasing prices for raw materials with a large carbon foot- print as a result of various carbon pricing mechanisms • potential revenue loss if Autoliv fails to meet increasingly strict supplier requirements from OEMs who themselves have set strict GHG emissions reduction targets 48 Climate risk assessment Transition risks Policy and legal Technology Market Reputational Physical risks Acute/short term Chronic/long term Most material risks Potential financial impacts Carbon pricing mechanisms leading to increasing prices for raw materials with a large carbon footprint Increased Opex Decrease in overall vehicle sales Loss of revenue Higher demand for renewable electricity and low-carbon raw materials Increased Opex Increasing stakeholder requirements or expectations on Autoliv to aggressively re- duce GHG emissions in its own operations and/or supply chain Loss of revenue, reduced access to capital Wildfires Extreme heat Flooding Extreme heat Water stress Loss of revenue related to production disruptions Disruption to water and energy supply Costs related to the need to relocate production The most material physical risks identified, generally con- nected to a 3-4°C scenario, were factors that would lead to significant production disruptions. These include wildfires, flooding and extreme heat. These risks were seen as par- ticularly high in countries and regions such as the South- west U.S., Mexico, India and China. These risks are also ex- pected to impact suppliers and customers in these regions. The most material opportunities identified pertained to building a strong position among climate-progressive OEMs including electric vehicel (EV) manufacturers as a supplier of low-carbon components as well as opportunities to increase operational energy and materials efficiency. Strategy and business impact integration Climate change is integrated into Autoliv’s business strate- gy, which is cascaded through established steering mecha- nisms such as annual business planning and target setting. To realize key climate-related business opportunities, we are continuously working on low-carbon product offer- ings and forming partnerships with customers to help them reduce the carbon footprint of their products. In addition, ef- forts to increase the energy and materials efficiency of our operations will support in reducing related Opex. As part of our climate transition plan, we aim to gradually further devel- op and use scenarios as a supporting tool in quantifying the financial impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities, including setting a price on carbon and other climate-related financial KPIs. Autoliv's strategic plan was updated in 2022, covering the years 2023-2025. Climate is included as one of the focus areas in the strategic plan. During 2023, we focused on fur- ther integrating climate considerations into the company's strategic product planning process and other key process- es, such as Capex decisions. Risk management Climate-related risks are generally integrated into the En- terprise Risk Management (ERM) process. For more infor- mation about ERM and management of sustainability risks, see pages 38-39. Transition risks are generally considered mitigated through continuous legal and market intelligence reviews, sales forecasting and external stakeholder engagement. Physical risks are generally considered mitigated through site risk and impact assessments as well as ongoing busi- ness continuity management. Metrics and targets In addition to Autoliv's long-term ambitions and Science Based Targets, the climate program covers a number of more detailed performance metrics and related targets. These cover the most important emissions reduction levers such as sourcing of low-carbon raw materials, low-carbon logistics and a transition towards renewable electricity use. Since 2022, GHG emissions from own operations (Scope 1+2) is a performance component to the long-term equity incentive program. The program covers around 300 participants, including the CEO and all EMT members. For more information on GHG emissions and target out- comes, see pages 61-62. 49 SUSTAINABILITY A Safe and Inclusive Workplace Ambitions: Zero accidents Embrace inclusive ways of working Targets: 0.35 Incident Rate by 2024 1 reported unsafe act or condition per employee per year 95% of senior and mid-level management trained in unconscious bias by 2023 Year-on-year improvement in Employee experience Continuous 2023 Outcome: Decrease 22% women in senior management by 2024 2023 Outcome: 19% 2023 Outcome: 0.381) 2023 Outcome: 1.4 2023 Outcome: 96% 1) See comments under Changes and corrections on page 60. Health, safety, and inclusion are pillars of our people strategy, ensuring that we create value from and for our most valuable asset - our employees. Health and Safety Our ambition and approach Autoliv is committed to providing safe and healthy working conditions for our employees and contractors. We believe that work-related injuries and illnesses are preventable and continually strive to eliminate all workplace accidents. The responsibility for health and safety (H&S) starts with senior management. All employees share a responsibility for iden- tifying and eliminating unsafe conditions and behaviors and speaking up. Health and safety management system We make H&S an integral part of everyday business by integrating H&S into our production system and all our 50 projects and processes that may affect the working environ- ment of our employees. All production sites are required to implement Autoliv’s health and safety management system (HSMS), which is aligned with ISO 45001 requirements. The cornerstone of our HSMS is the global safety assess- ment that is an integrated part of the Autoliv Production System. These quarterly assessments establish the princi- ples and internal standards by which H&S activities and op- erations are managed, provide a factual basis for identifying significant hazards and risks, and support in implementing continuous improvement activities to eliminate or mitigate these hazards and risks. The HSMS is supported by local leadership teams who encourage operators and visitors to engage in and proac- tively speak up about health and safety concerns and to take responsibility for safety. Implementation of the system is monitored through internal audits and external certifica- tion audits. At year end, 61% of production sites were ISO 45001 certified. Autoliv's H&S work principles Leadership commitment Leaders at all levels of the organization are ac- tively involved in creating a behavior that supports and promotes strong H&S performance and continu- ous improvement. Employee involvement Employees are actively engaged in all aspects of H&S performance, including establishing goals, identify- ing and reporting hazards/ risks, investigating incidents and tracking progress. Workplace safety is a condition for employment Every employee is responsible for contributing to their own workplace safety. Recognition and control of risks Processes and procedures are implemented to pro- actively identify, prevent, reduce and/or control potential hazards/risks. Continuous improvement Processes and proce- dures are implemented to monitor H&S, verify implementation, identify defects and provide opportunities for improvement. As part of our continuous focus on accident prevention, we are continuously expanding the use of leading H&S indica- tors. In 2022, we added identified unsafe acts and condi- tions to monthly management reporting and during 2023, the reporting of unsafe acts and conditions significantly in- creased surpassing the target of 1 per employee. This re- flects an increased awareness of the importance of report- ing safety issues. H&S training and awareness building During 2023, H&S continued to be a key topic at EMT and Divisional Management Team meetings. Leadership safety training continued throughout the year and in 2024 the train- ing will be deployed to team leaders in operations. All em- ployees working in production are trained in relevant H&S topics and H&S is included as a mandatory item in daily team meetings. In addition, they are trained in the use of on-site H&S reporting tools and empowered to immediately stop production if an actual or potential serious risk is identi- fied. Focus on high-risk activities During 2023, we continued the focus on high-risk activi- ties within our operations. To better control these risks, we have developed and implemented internal standards cov- ering a number of high-risk areas: • Working at height • Lock-out/tag-out • Traffic safety • Machine safety • Lifting and rigging • Contractor safety These standards are implemented and followed up through the global safety assessment. We are increasingly focusing on incidents that could have resulted in a serious injury or fatality. All such incidents are reviewed by the responsible management team and shared globally so that measures can be put in place to prevent re- peat incidents. Inclusion Our ambition and approach Inclusive ways of working are an asset and a fundamen- tal part of the Autoliv Key Behaviors that were launched in 2021. Including a multitude of perspectives is an integral aspect of successful decision-making in all parts of the or- ganization and helps drive innovation and create long-term sustainable shareholder value in a rapidly changing industry. We believe that everyone should be respected and treated fairly, and we are committed to providing an inclusive and di- verse workplace where everyone can be themselves, deliver results and bring their authentic selves to work. Activities during the year During 2023, we continued our activities to deliver on inclu- sion targets, including a focus on increasing the share of women in management. While we did not meet our target for the share of women in senior management compared to 2022, we took important steps to create a more diverse can- didate base, and began to use scientific selection methods to increase objectivity in both internal and external recruit- ment. We also continued unconscious bias training for sen- ior and middle management to enhance managers’ insight and ability to take diversity into account in everyday work. Measuring inclusion and Employee Experience The company-wide quarterly employee survey includes statements that measure key aspects of an inclusive work environment including: whether employees feel that they can be themselves at work (“Authenticity”) and whether they have the same opportunity to advance in the organization (“Perceived fairness”). The scores were lower in 2023 com- pared to 2022, largely attributable to a general decrease in employee sentiment related to organizational changes im- plemented from the second quarter. Women were, in gen- eral, more positive than men and had a more positive per- ception of inclusion within the company. For more information about employee development, see pages 32-33. 51 SUSTAINABILITY Ambitions: Responsible Business Proactively prevent corruption and other unethical business practices Respect human rights Manage supply chain sustainability risks Targets: 100% of target group completed Antitrust training Continuous 100% of target group Code of Conduct certified Continuous 100% direct material suppliers sustainability audited Continuous 100% direct material suppliers respond to conflict minerals survey Continuous 2023 Outcome: 98% 2023 Outcome: 93% 2023 Outcome: 99% 2023 Outcome: 97% Responsible business practices are key in ensuring that we understand the impacts of our business operations, comply with laws and regulations, and meet stakeholder ex- pectations. Our Responsible Business strategy Responsible business is a fundamental element of Autoliv’s sustainability framework. To recruit and retain the best talent and to build enduring relationships with our customers and suppliers, it is essential that Autoliv is known for the quality and integrity of its conduct as well as its products and ser- vices. Through our approach to responsible business, we work to continually strengthen how we: • Proactively prevent corruption and other illegal or unethical business practices wherever we operate • Respect human rights across our value chain • Manage sustainability risks and impacts across our supply chain Code of Conduct Saving Lives with Integrity 52 Compliance and Corporate Integrity Autoliv’s Compliance and Corporate Integrity Program Autoliv’s compliance program is designed in accordance with a number of frameworks and best practice guidance, such as guidelines for effective compliance programs under the Organizational Guidelines issued by the U.S. Sentenc- ing Commission, the U.S. Department of Justice - Evalua- tion of Corporate Compliance Programs, and the UK Bribery Act Guidance. The program serves to ensure that adequate procedures are in place to prevent Autoliv from taking part in any corrupt business practices, or other illegal and unethical behavior, and that the company adheres to applicable laws and regulations. The program also drives compliance with relevant standards including the Autoliv Code of Conduct, as well as corporate standards. Leading with Integrity Leading with Integrity is at the core of Autoliv’s Compliance and Corporate Integrity program. We strongly believe that leaders play the most important role in enabling, inspiring, and making it easy for employees to make responsible deci- sions. They also play an important role in fostering an open and transparent culture where all employees feel safe and encouraged to Speak Up. In 2023, we launched a number of initiatives under the “Leading with Integrity” umbrella. For example, we introduced the Leading with Integrity Library, which provides helpful resources and ready-to-use material Compliance and Corporate Integrity Program for leaders. Resources include Listen Up Leaders – creating a speak up culture, Respect in the Workplace workshop ma- terial, leader-led discussions about the purpose of our Code of Conduct as well as the “Integrity Check” game. Saving Lives with Integrity: Our Code of Conduct In 2022, Autoliv introduced a revised Code of Conduct. Sev- eral training courses and activities were arranged through- out 2023 with the aim to increase awareness of the new Code of Conduct. These included leader-led discussions focused on different aspects of our Code, responsible busi- ness approach and Code of Conduct training specifically for production staff. Autoliv’s onboarding process for new employees in- cludes an introduction to the Code of Conduct through team-based discussions on the role of our Code, our In- tegrity Check, what we should expect from each other, and speaking up. During 2023, over 8,000 new employees par- ticipated in face-to-face Code of Conduct trainings. In addi- tion, a new Code of Conduct e-learning was developed dur- ing the year, to be rolled out to all non-production employees in 2024. Each year, all Autoliv employees in a leadership role must complete a Code of Conduct certification. The certi- fication requires the disclosure of known violations of the Code and an acknowledgement that the leaders are aware of and promote the Code to their teams. At year end, 93% of target group employees had completed certification. Colleagues at Autoliv in Shanghai, China. 53 SUSTAINABILITY Autoliv's Integrity Check If you answer any of these questions with a “no” or “I’m not sure”, pause and seek additional guidance. Do I have all the information to support a good decision? Do I still feel proud of myself and Autoliv? Is it legal and consistent with our Code? Part of the training related to our Code of Conduct is an interactive game – Integrity Check. The aim is to help em- ployees get a deeper understanding and inspire discussions about decision making with integrity in a new and engaging way. The roll-out of the game is ongoing and will continue during 2024 with the aim that all top management leaders should complete the game activity with their teams. Do I know how to explain the decision to those impacted? Have I discussed with the right people? Anti-corruption At Autoliv, we compete vigorously and effectively while al- ways complying with applicable anti-corruption laws. We have zero tolerance for any form of corruption in our busi- ness dealings and expect the same standards from our business partners. Our anti-corruption program is intended to support the principles in the Autoliv Code of Conduct and internal anti-corruption policy by providing employees guid- ance with regards to: • Avoiding corruption and bribery • Proper interaction with public officials • Guidance on gifts and hospitality • Charitable donations and sponsorships • How to manage risks relating to third parties We perform due diligence on all high-risk third-party relation- ships and apply risk-based controls to support our third par- ties in applying our anti-corruption commitments. In 2023, work continued to strengthen the due diligence process for suppliers. We use a combination of face-to-face workshops and virtual training to maintain anti-corruption awareness and knowledge for certain employees within functions with in- creased risk exposure. Anti-corruption training is mandatory for selected employees in functions with high corruption risk exposure. Antitrust We will always thrive best in fair and open markets. There- fore, we rigorously follow all competition and antitrust laws that apply to our operations. Our Antitrust and Competition Policy provides detailed guidelines on how to deal with our legal obligations in competition and antitrust laws. To further increase knowledge about Antitrust & Fair Competition, a new antitrust e-learning course was rolled out in the first part of 2023. At year end, 98% of target group employees had completed the course. The new e-learning gathers information related to how confident employees feel about the topic and which questions are considered difficult. This additional data helps us identify areas where we need to provide additional guidance and support; as a result, fur- ther guidance concerning interactions with competitors and careful communication was added to the course. In addition to the e-learning, certain functions and roles with increased exposure to antitrust risks will receive additional targeted training suited to their job responsibilities and work context. 54 Speaking Up Autoliv has embraced a broad definition for Speaking Up: “any communication or discussion with the intent to bring positive change, show encouragement or highlight an issue for improvement”. To help ensure that our broad definition of Speaking Up is consistently referenced and promoted across workstreams and strategic initiatives, implementa- tion of the Speak Up policy is the joint responsibility of sev- eral functions: Compliance & Corporate Integrity, Health & Safety, Quality, and HR. Although we believe this broader definition will benefit our business in all aspects, we make it clear that Autoliv employees are responsible for immedi- ately reporting suspected or known violations of the Code of Conduct, the law or Autoliv’s policies. All employees are frequently informed of the multiple channels available for raising such issues. In most cases, this should be to their manager or a member of local management. When this is not possible (for any reason), colleagues in HR, the Legal Department, or Compliance Officers are always available, or the Autoliv Helpline can be used. In December 2022, we launched a Speaking Up e- learning for all employees and additional training for leaders on their role in creating a Speak Up culture. The e-learning takes employees through a series of situations where they are asked to make a decision about what to do next. By the end of 2023, 98% of employees had completed the Speak- ing Up e-learning and 97% of managers had completed the additional manager training. Awareness of Speak Up chan- nels and confidence in speaking up are measured in quar- terly employee surveys. In 2023, 68% of employees who participated in the sur- veys felt safe to speak up at Autoliv, same result as in 2022. While many teams report that they feel safe to speak up, we know this sentiment is not yet universal in all parts of Autoliv. The Code of Conduct and Speak Up policy firmly state that no employee or third party should be adversely affected for reporting in good faith or for refusing to carry out a directive believed to constitute a violation of the Code or other Autoliv policies, laws, or regulations. Speaking Up@Autoliv: “Any communication or discussion with the intent to bring positive change, show encouragement or highlight an issue for improvement”. In order to measure how well we have communicated to the employees about our Speak Up philosophy and program, we launched a Speak Up awareness survey for employees in our Europe, Asia and China divisions. The results of the survey are analyzed and discussed within the respective management teams and form the basis for continued com- munication and training about Speaking Up, both for em- ployees and for management. Direct line manager Helpline Other trusted local leaders Compliance team Specialist colleagues (e.g. HR, HSE, APS, Quality, Legal) Autoliv Helpline The Autoliv Helpline is a third-party operated reporting ser- vice available to all employees as well as any third party. Reports can be made anonymously (where allowed by law) and/or confidentially in the language of any country where Autoliv operates. All reports are investigated to determine whether there is any violation of the law, the Code of Con- duct or other Autoliv policies. Reporting In 2023, a total of 426 reports were received by the Compli- ance team. Around 89% were received via the Helpline re- porting system (phone or online) and the other reports were raised internally, meaning reported directly to management, HR, Legal or Compliance teams. Of the reports received, 70% were, opened for investigation. Of the investigations closed in 2023, 36% of the allegations or cases were sub- stantiated or partially substantiated. Compared to previous years, 2023 saw an increase in the number of reports related to harassment and conflict of interest. Substantiated cases are presented to appropriate management for decision on disciplinary action and other remediation activities. All high risk case are presented to Executive Management and Audit and Risk Committee of the Board on a regular basis. 55 SUSTAINABILITY Tax policy At Autoliv, tax planning is carried out in compliance with the Tax Policy approved by the Board of Directors. The basic principle is to respect all relevant laws, disclosure require- ments and regulations, while safeguarding shareholder in- terests and the Autoliv brand. All tax planning must be in line with Autoliv’s business purpose and no baseless organiza- tional structure is permitted. All Autoliv affiliates are required to pay all tax obligations and meet relevant payment dead- lines, to fully comply with all relevant tax laws and account- ing rules and regulations in the tax jurisdictions in which the business operates, and to be open and transparent with tax authorities about their tax liability. When disputes arise, Autoliv will proactively seek to work cooperatively with full transparency. Human rights Human rights are an integral part of Autoliv’s sustainability agenda and cut across all sustainability focus areas. We are committed to respecting the UN Universal Declaration of Hu- man Rights as well as human rights-related commitments laid out in the UN Global Compact Principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. We are continuously assessing the quickly evolving legislatory landscape as well as customer- and investor-related expectations. During 2023 we continued the work to further develop our human rights due diligence processes, with particular focus on mapping human rights-related risks for select raw materials supply chains. This work will continue in 2024. Human rights commitments are included in our Code of Conduct and our Supplier Code. These Codes are sup- ported by topic-specific policies that cover specific human rights, such as our Health & Safety Policy, Respect in the Workplace Policy and Conflict Minerals Policy. Implementa- tion of our commitments is ensured through management attention and reporting, management systems, standards, risk and impact assessments, other tools and training. Human rights are also a cross-cutting theme in our com- munity engagement activities. One such example is our and other large Swedish companies’ long-standing collabora- tion with the NGO Pratham to ensure effective education for 30,000 children in Assam in India. Key human rights-related commitments include: • Our products save lives, and we need to ensure the quality and safety of our products as they never get a second chance • We are committed to offering a safe and inclusive workplace and respecting all other labor rights • Our climate ambitions are aligned with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C, thereby mitigating the most severe impacts on societies and the environment • Our supply chain sustainability risk management processes consider human rights risks and impacts Human Rights in the Automotive Industry As a global automotive supplier, Autoliv faces human rights risks in a number of areas. As laid out in the report "Shifting Gears, An Assessment of Human Rights Risks & Due Diligence in the Automotive Industry", published by the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG), the most salient risks and issues include: Child labor and forced labor Workplace health and safety, discrimination and harassment Working conditions, wages and freedom of association Conflict minerals Climate change and environmental degradation Labor rights Autoliv is committed to offering fair terms and conditions of employment to all employees regardless of employment type, status, or location. These commitments extend across our supply chain. Our talent development strategies and employment policies support the International Labour Or- ganization’s Fundamental Principles and Labor Standards. We are committed to: • Providing fair and equitable wages, working hours, benefits, and other conditions of employment in accordance with applicable laws • Recognizing and respecting employees’ right to freedom of association and collective bargaining • Providing decent and safe working conditions • Prohibiting child, forced, and bonded labor • Promoting a safe workplace free from any form of discrimination or harassment 56 Autoliv is committed to engaging in open and transparent dialogue with all employees and, where applicable, with representatives of organized labor groups and unions. We recognize and respect employees' rights to freedom of as- sociation and collective bargaining. Approximately 50 per- cent of our work force is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. In addition, we have a number of different mech- anisms through which employees can bring up topics with management. These include Autoliv's Speak Up channels (including the Autoliv Helpline), an employee suggestion program, local health and safety committees, and opera- tional committees. The major unions representing Autoliv employees in different regions are disclosed as part of the 10-K filed with the SEC. During 2023, to accelerate structural cost reductions, announcements were made regarding site closures and in- direct headcount reductions. Autoliv is committed to man- aging any workforce reductions responsibly. In all cases, ne- gotiations were carried out with local unions and authorities in accordance with laws and regulations. Depending on the circumstances, certain employees were offered relocation, severance pay, early retirement packages, or other addition- al compensation. In the later parts of the year, Autoliv's operations in Queretaro, Mexico, were subject to mass media atten- tion related to alleged labor rights breaches and a review into its operations by the U.S Interagency Labor Commit- tee for Monitoring and Enforcement established under the United States- Mexico-Canada (USMCA) Agreement. With over 16,000 employees in Mexico, Autoliv's announced headcount reductions sparked conversations about labor practices, worker rights, and the dynamics of employee- employer relationships within the company. On December 6th, Autoliv's local subsidiary finalized a collective bargain- ing agreement for employees at the Queretaro facility. Supply chain sustainability Our ambition and approach Through responsible sourcing practices and supplier collab- oration, Autoliv aims to create positive social and environ- mental value across our supply chain. We expect suppliers and third parties to enact the same standards and process- es as we do when it comes to proactively managing key sus- tainability impacts and risks such as GHG emissions, labor rights, and anti-corruption. To manage our global supply chain in a responsible man- ner, we focus on integrating sustainability into relevant supply chain management processes. Suppliers are monitored in a live risk tool covering such factors as natural disasters, financial status, reputation, risks, and responsible sourcing practices. Autoliv’s lead buyers are updated regularly with information related to their suppliers, allowing them to take immediate action when necessary. While our main focus is on direct material suppliers, dur- ing 2023 we continued to expand the scope of our supply chain sustainability risk management to indirect suppliers. Our approach is to work with suppliers, to the greatest ex- tent possible, to resolve issues before determining to poten- tially phase out the supplier. Further information related to supply chain risks is available in the 10-K filed with the SEC. Supplier Code of Conduct and Sustainable Sourcing Requirements We expect our suppliers to comply with the laws and regula- tions in the areas where they operate and to follow Autoliv’s policies and procedures, including our Standards of Busi- ness Conduct and Ethics for Suppliers (Supplier Code of Conduct). In situations where an Autoliv requirement may differ from local laws or regulations, we expect our suppli- ers to follow the most stringent requirements. The Supplier Code conveys our expectation that suppliers will uphold our social, ethical and environmental standards in conducting their businesses in areas including human rights and work- ing conditions, environmental protection, and business con- duct and ethics. For direct material suppliers, the Supplier Code is included in the Autoliv Supplier Manual (ASM). All direct material suppliers are required to acknowledge their compliance with the ASM as part of our general terms and conditions and by signing a separate acknowledgement let- ter for the ASM. In the case of indirect suppliers, a reference to the Supplier Code is included in the general terms and conditions attached to purchasing orders. In early 2023, a revised Supplier Code of Conduct was rolled out to suppli- ers, with strengthened requirements in particular related to conflict minerals and environmental impacts. Launched in end of 2023, our Sustainable Sourcing Requirements are being communicated to direct material suppliers. The document contains further detailed require- ments and expectations related to the four focus areas of the Supplier Code of Conduct. Supplier audits Autoliv has dedicated teams responsible for the qual- ity management of our supply base, including mandatory steps such as pre-qualification audits for new direct mate- rial suppliers. Sustainability criteria are included as a mod- ule in these prequalification audits and must be met before becoming an Autoliv supplier. These audits ensure that our suppliers adhere to Autoliv’s standards as well as to appli- cable local laws and regulations, and establish a process for working with suppliers that fail to meet our policies and standards. If audited suppliers don’t meet our requirements, an internal escalation process is in place to ensure that non- conformities are corrected. At year-end, 99% of active di- rect material suppliers within audit scope had undergone a sustainability audit. Our audit practices are aligned with the AIAG guidelines. 57 SUSTAINABILITY Conflict minerals & Extended minerals Pursuant to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules, conflict minerals include certain minerals (tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, also known as 3TG) that origi- nated in the Democratic Republic of Congo or an adjoining country and are sold to benefit groups financing armed con- flicts in those regions. We recognize the need to end the ille- gal extraction and trade of natural resources, and the human rights violations, conflicts and environmental degradation that result from this trade. We have designed our conflict minerals approach in accordance with the internationally recognized OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsi- ble Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, specifically as it relates to our position as a downstream purchaser. The OECD Due Diligence Guid- ance has a broader scope and covers more minerals than 3TG. Our Conflict Minerals Policy provides further clarifica- tion regarding conflict minerals, and its principles are incor- porated into our Supplier Code of Conduct and the Sustain- able Sourcing Requirements. In order to comply with the SEC’s conflict minerals rules and regulations and to ensure responsible sourcing of com- ponents, parts or products containing conflict minerals, we continuously review our supply chain and work with our sup- pliers to identify and improve the traceability of potential conflict minerals. We support industry initiatives, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), and utilize exter- nal expert guidance to validate that the metals used in our products come from sustainable sources and do not con- tribute to conflicts. In cases where we find potential risks and conflicts with smelters identified within our supply chain, we take immediate action to mitigate the potential risks. In some cases, this means discontinuing sourcing from suppli- ers that are in violation of our requirements to ensure sourc- ing from designated RMI active or conformant suppliers. To ensure our understanding of the potential use of conflict minerals, we have implemented an annual conflict minerals campaign covering our direct material suppliers. The scope of the annual campaign includes all direct mate- rial suppliers that have conducted business with us during the current calendar year and have listed 3TG in their Bill of Materials. This information is extracted from the automotive industry standard reporting platform IMDS. The response rate to the latest completed campaign, which ended in May 2023, was 97%. Most non-responding suppliers were customer-directed suppliers. We are working with these customers to mitigate this issue for future conflict minerals campaigns. We publish an annual report on our conflict min- erals campaign on our website. 58 In addition to conflict minerals, we also have in place an an- nual reporting campaign related to tracing extended miner- als (cobalt and mica) used in components supplied to us. Autoliv does not permit the sourcing of cobalt or mica from high-risk smelters, and suppliers must be able to trace co- balt and mica content in components or raw materials by part number from their facility back to the supplier sourcing from the identified smelters. Airbag component manufacturing. Sustainability Appendix Pages 34-63 comprise Autoliv’s Sustainability Report 2023. Reporting scope The report covers Autoliv Inc. and all companies over which Autoliv Inc. directly or indirectly exercises control (opera- tional control approach). Reported information covers the full calendar year. Exceptions to this scope: • Health and safety reporting excludes office locations • Environmental reporting excludes office locations as well as other locations with an insignificant environmental impact • Scope 1+2 emissions for 2023 are based on actual ac- tivity data for January-November and estimated activity data for December. Estimations are based primarily on historical activity data (Q4 2022 and Q1-Q3 2023) The excluded locations are considered non-material in terms of their impact on total figures. GHG emissions and energy All GHG emissions are reported as CO₂e. Due to their na- ture or to availability, some emission factors used may only cover CO₂, however the difference has been assessed as non-material. Energy consumption and GHG emissions are based on activity data reported in volume or quantity in an internal re- porting system. The data is based primarily on invoices, but may be estimated if exact measurements or invoices do not exist. Scope 1+2 Regarding Scope 1+2 emissions, Autoliv applies the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. Autoliv's primary Scope 2 GHG accounting approach is market-based, and related GHG emissions targets and oth- er metrics are based on market-based Scope 2 emissions. The following emission factor sources were used to calcu- late 2023 GHG emissions: • Scope 1 energy fuels 1): Defra 2022 • Scope 1 fugitive emissions 2, 3): Defra 2022, IPCC AR5, producer stated GWP • Scope 2 location-based electricity and district heating/steam: IEA 2022 • Scope 2 market-based electricity: provided by supplier, or national grid average for the sites where suppliers were unable to provide a specific emission factor • Scope 2 market-based district heating/steam: IEA 2022 1) Gasoline, diesel, fuel oil, LPG. 2) Mainly SF6, fugitive CO2, N2O and various refrigerants. 3) The emission factor for SF6 at one facility has been adjusted down by 20% to account for not all gas being released into the atmosphere. The adjustment is based on tests at the facility and has been applied also to the SF₆ emission factor used for 2021 and 2022. The adjustment is a best estimate associated with inherent uncertainty as the exact reduction has not been established. 2021 and 2022 emissions have been calculated mainly using older sets of the same emission factor sources. The updated emission factors for 2023 represent around a 40 kton reduc- tion in Scope 1+2 emissions between 2021-2022 and 2023, impacting in particular market-based electricity emissions. 59 External reporting frameworks The following external reporting frameworks have been con- sidered for the structure and content of this Sustainability Report: • We consider the Sustainability Report aligned with the general requirements of the EU Non-Financial Report- ing Directive (NFRD). Autoliv’s assessment, supported by third party legal expertise, is that for the year 2023, Autoliv Inc. was not required to report in accordance with the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) or the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). • This Sustainability Appendix includes references to the voluntary SASB Auto Parts Sustainability Accounting Standard. • A TCFD Disclosure is included on pages 48-49. • A statement prepared to comply with the reporting ob- ligation of California’s Voluntary Carbon Market Disclo- sure Act (VCMDA) is available on autoliv.com. External assurance Scope 1+2 emissions for 2023, reported in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Report- ing Standard, have been subject to limited review carried out by EY. The limited review was conducted in accordance with ISAE 3410 assurance standard. The auditor's report is available on autoliv.com. An additional statement prepared to comply with the disclosure obligations of California’s Vol- untary Carbon Market Disclosure Act (VCMDA) is available on the Climate Action page on autoliv.com. UN Global Compact Communication on Progress This Sustainability Report serves as Autoliv’s Communica- tion on Progress related to the UN Global Compact. The following sections demonstrate our commitment to imple- menting the Global Compact principles: • Road Safety - a Global Challenge: Principle 1 • A Safe and Inclusive Workplace: Principle 6 • Climate and Circularity: Principles 7-9 • Responsible Business: Principles 1-6, 10 SUSTAINABILITY Scope 3 Reported Scope 3 emissions have been modelled in ac- cordance with the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Calculation Guid- ance based on a combination of spend data (e.g. logistics spend) and activity data (e.g. materials purchased). Gener- ic emission factors have been applied as supplier-specific emission factors are generally not available. Reporting is limited to Scope 3 upstream categories as those are consid- ered material for Autoliv and are covered by Autoliv's sup- ply chain climate ambition and the Scope 3 Science Based Target. Science Based Targets In January 2022, the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) approved Autoliv's Science Based Targets (SBTs): • Reduce absolute Scope 1+2 emissions by 75% from a 2018 base year • Reduce absolute Scope 3 upstream emissions by 15% from a 2018 base year The Scope 1+2 SBT is 1.5°C aligned and has a baseline of 423 kton. 2023 Scope 1+2 emissions of 358 kton is a 15% absolute reduction compared to the baseline. The scope 3 SBT is 2°C aligned and has a baseline of 3,100 kton. 2023 Scope 3 upstream emissions of 3,770 kton is an 18% absolute increase compared to the baseline. Energy Energy conversion for energy fuels have been taken from public data. The same energy conversion factors have been applied to all reported energy consumption 2021-2023 with the exception of natural gas. There has been a small change to the 2021-2022 factor and the higher conversion factor ap- plied to natural gas for 2023 represents an increase of 28 GWh direct energy in 2023 compared to 2021-2022 how- ever, does not impact Scope 1 emissions. Previously reported 2021 and 2022 Changes and corrections In 2023, there were no material changes in reporting scope. location-based Scope 2 emissions have been corrected due to earlier cal- culation error. The correction resulted in a change of loca- tion-based Scope 2 emissions from 285 to 291 kton CO2e for 2021 and from 276 to 316 kton CO2e for 2022. The cor- rection of location-based Scope emissions does not impact reported market-based Scope 2 emissions. The 2021-2023 Incident Rates differ from prior Autoliv reports and releases due to a previous miscalculation; they have been adjusted upwards to reflect the correct Incident Rate. The Company continues to focus on ways to reduce injuries and lower the Incident Rate. 60 Saving More Lives Targets & Metrics 2023 2022 2021 Comments 100,000 lives saved per year 35,000 Close to 35,000 Close to 35,000 We estimate that in addition to lives saved, our products reduce more than 450,000 injuries annually. Share of global recalls (%)1 ~2% ~2% ~2% The share is calculated as a ten year rolling average based on information from national official databases. 1) SASB TR-AP-250a 1. A Safe and Inclusive Workplace Targets & Metrics 2023 2022 2021 Comments Health and Safety 0.35 Incident Rate by 2024 0.38 0.38 0.48 Number of reportable injuries, i.e. injuries that require treatment beyond first aid or results in one or more days of lost time, per 200,000 employee hours of exposure. See comments under Changes and corrections on page 60. Work-related fatalities 0 2 1 Share of production sites ISO 45001 certified (%) 61% 56% Not available Comparable number for 2021 is not available. Inclusion 95% of senior and mid-level management trained in unconscious bias by 2023 Year-on-year improvement in Employee experience. Continuous 96% 52% 42% - Authenticity - Perceived fairness 73 59 80 73 80 73 22% women in senior management by 2024 19% 18% 17% Share of women in the workforce (%) 49% 49% 47% Share of women in the Executive Management Team (%) 8% 0% 8% Climate and Circularity 2021-2022 results are from the annual employ- ee survey, 2023 results from the Q3 quarterly employee survey. Results are comparable. Senior management consists of around 110 employees and include the Executive Management Team. Targets & Metrics 2023 2022 2021 Comments Carbon neutrality in own operations by 2030 358 kton CO2e 430 kton CO2e 435 kton CO2e Scope 1+2 market-based emissions. Year-on-year improvement Continuous Year-on-year reduction in waste Continuous 3% improve- ment 12% increase 2% improve- ment 9% increase 2% improve- ment 3% increase Total energy consumption per part delivered. Total waste. 61 SUSTAINABILITY Climate and Circularity Targets & Metrics GHG Emissions 2023 2022 2021 Comments GHG emissions intensity (Scope 1+2) 34.2 48.5 56.3 Ton CO2e per million USD sales (FX adjusted). Direct Scope 1 GHG emissions (kton CO2e) - Natural gas - Other energy fuels – SF6 - Other fugitive emissions Total Indirect Scope 2 GHG emissions (kton CO2e) - Electricity, market-based - District heating/steam, market-based Total, market-based - Electricity, location-based - District heating/steam, location-based Total, location-based Upstream Scope 3 emissions (kton CO2e) - Purchased goods and services (category 1) - Upstream transportation (category 4) - Other upstream (categories 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8) 57 9 22 7 95 247 16 263 290 16 306 3,070 460 240 52 10 35 5 51 9 37 6 102 103 316 15 331 276 15 291 311 17 328 299 17 316 3,000 510 190 Total Energy1 3,770 3,700 Energy intensity 100.5 110.5 119.5 MWh per million USD sales (FX adjusted). Energy use (GWh) - Direct - natural gas - Direct - other energy fuels Direct total - Indirect - electricity - Indirect - district heating/steam Indirect total 282 39 321 704 28 732 250 40 290 661 29 690 245 36 281 615 27 642 Total 1,053 980 923 Share of renewable energy/electricity (%) - Renewable energy - Renewable electricity 15% 23% 9% 13% 1% 1% Included in total direct energy use but not part of the breakdown is around 240 MWh of on-site solar PV generation. Renewable electricity is calculated as as the share of purchased electricity covered by a 'green tariff', EAC/REC/GO or PPA and may come from any renewable source. 100% of direct energy is considered non-renewable. 1) SASB TR-AP-130a Waste1 Waste (kton) Share of waste by type (%) - Non-hazardous - Hazardous Share of waste by treatment (%) - Reuse, recycling, energy recovery - Landfill 1) SASB TR-AP-150a 62 113 101 93 89% 11% 91% 9% 89% 11% 90% 10% 89% 11% 89% 11% Climate and Circularity Targets & Metrics 2023 2022 2021 Comments Other Water withdrawal (m3) 2,290,000 2,360,000 2,310,000 100% of water withdrawal is reported as coming from municipal or third party sources. Share of production sites ISO 14001 certified (%) Number of significant spills, and related fines Responsible Business 92% 96% 89% 0 0 0 A significant spill is defined as having a financial impact of USD 100,000 or more. Targets & Metrics 2023 2022 2021 Comments Business Ethics 100% in target group completed antitrust training Continuous 100% in target group Code of Conduct certified Continuous Supply Chain Sustainability 100% direct material suppliers sustainability audited Continuous 98% 99% 96% Target group is based on the risk exposure of certain employee groups. 93% 99% 99% Target group is employees in a leadership role. 99% 98% 81% Percentage is based on active direct material suppliers within audit scope who have undergone a sustainability audit. 100% direct material suppliers respond to conflict minerals survey Continuous 97% 89% 99% Compliance Speak Up Number of Compliance Speak Up reports 426 – Reported through Autoliv Helpline (%) – Reported through other channels (%) 89% 11% 318 89% 11% 284 88% 12% Other channels include internal reports directly to management, HR, the Legal or Compliance teams. Compliance Speak Up reports per 100 employees 0.61 0.46 0.47 Labor Rights Share of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements (%) ~50% ~50% ~50% Around 80% of the countries where Autoliv has employees have collective bargaining agre- ements. 63 THE AUTOLIV SHARE Creating Shareholder Value By ensuring customer satisfaction, main- taining tight cost control and developing new products, we generate cash for long-term growth, financial stability and competitive returns to our shareholders. Autoliv has a strong cash flow and cash generation focus. Our operating cash flow has always exceeded our capital expenditures. On average, our continuing operations ex- cluding antitrust payment in 2019 have generated $828 million in cash per year over the last five years, while our capital expenditures, net, have averaged $465 million per year during the same period. Capital efficiency Our strong cash flow reflects both Autoliv’s earnings perfor- mance and our capital efficiency. During 2023, our capital turnover rate, meaning our sales in relation to average capi- tal employed, increased from 2.4 to 2.7 times, significantly better than our 5-year average capital turnover rate of 2.2. Our cash flow model When analyzing how best to use each year’s cash flows from operations, Autoliv’s Executive Management and the Board of Directors use a model for creating shareholder value that considers variables such as the marginal cost of borrowing, the return on marginal investments and the price of Autoliv shares. When evaluating the various uses of cash, the need for flexibility is weighed against acquisitions and other potential uses of cash. Investing in operations To create long-term shareholder value, cash flow from op- erations should only be used to finance investments in op- erations until the point when the return on investment no longer exceeds the cost of capital. Our historical weighted average cost of capital has been approximately 10% to 13% in the past ten years. Autoliv’s pre-tax return on capital employed has generally exceeded this level, except during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. During the last five years, the return on capital employed has varied between 10% and 20%, i.e. about one to two times the pre- tax cost of capital. In 2023, $569 million was reinvested in the form of capital expenditures, net. This corresponds to 58% of the year’s operating cash flow of $982 million. Capital expendi- ture, net, was 51% higher than depreciation and amortiza- tion as we invest in footprint optimization, capacity increas- es and flexible automation to drive increased efficiency and support the sales growth we expect from executing on our strong order book in the coming years. 64 Cash flow vs. Capex US$ (Millions) Shareholder Returns US$ (Millions) 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 19 20 21 22 23 Operating cash flow Capital expenditures, net 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 19 20 21 22 23 Share buybacks Dividend Assets by Category US$ (Millions) Capital Turnover Rate Times, sales in relation to average capital employed 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 3 2 1 0 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 Trade working capital Property, plant and equipment Goodwill and other intangible assets Return on Capital Employed % Capex and D&A US$ (Millions) and in relation to sales % 25 20 15 10 5 0 600 525 450 375 300 225 150 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 Capex, net Capex, net % of sales D&A % of sales 65 THE AUTOLIV SHARE Autoliv's model for creating shareholder value US$ (millions) 2023 2022 165 982 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 352 226 569 113 713 115 226 485 Cash IN Cash OUT Cash IN Cash OUT CASH IN Operations Increase in net debt and other CASH OUT Capital expenditures, net Total dividends paid Stock repurchases Acquisitions, divestments and investments in assets In order to accelerate company growth and create share- holder value over time, we could use some of the cash flow generated for acquisitions and for investments in assets such as joint ventures and intellectual property. These in- vestments are typically made to consolidate our position in the industry, increase our vertical integration or expand into new markets. In the near future, we do not consider acquisi- tions as a high priority part of our strategy. Shareholder returns Autoliv has historically used both dividend payments and share repurchases to create shareholder value. Autoliv does not have a set dividend policy. Instead, the Board of Directors regularly analyzes which method is most effec- tive in order to create shareholder value. For the full year 2023, the dividend was increased from $2.58 to $2.66 per share. In total, $225 million was used to pay dividends to shareholders in 2023. Historically, the dividend has usually represented a yield of approximately 2-3% in relation to 66 Autoliv's average share price, except in 2020, when a divi- dend was only paid for one quarter as a response to the ef- fects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2023, this yield was around 2.9%. Repurchases of shares can create more value for shareholders than dividends, if the share price appreciates over the long term. This has been the case for Autoliv as the Company's existing 5.0 million treasury shares have been repurchased at an average cost of $56.13 per share while the closing share price at the end of 2023 was $110.19. During 2023, Autoliv repurchased and retired 3.67 mil- lion shares, equal to $352 million, under the current stock repurchase program authorized by the Board to repurchase up to $1.5 billion, or 17 million common shares (whichever comes first), between January 2022 and the end of 2024. At end of 2023, total number of shares repurchased under the program was approximately 5.1 million for a total of $467 million. Capital structure Our debt limitation policy is to maintain a financial leverage commensurate with a “strong investment grade credit rat- ing”. Our long-term target is to have a leverage ratio (Net Debt, including pension liability, in relation to EBITDA) of around 1 time and to be within the range of 0.5 and 1.5 times. In addition to the above, the objective is to provide the Company with sufficient flexibility to manage the in- herent risks and cyclicality in Autoliv’s business and allow the Company to realize strategic opportunities and fund growth initiatives while creating shareholder value. In 2023, Autoliv remained inside the target range as cash flow re- mained solid and EBITDA improved. On December 31, 2023, the leverage ratio was 1.2 times. Autoliv holds a “BBB with stable outlook” long-term credit rating from Standard & Poor's. We aim to maintain a strong investment grade rat- ing as our current capital structure should provide flexibility to generate further shareholder returns and the funding of our capital requirements. Shareholder information Autoliv’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) while Autoliv's Swedish depositary re- ceipts (SDRs) are traded on NASDAQ Stockholm’s list for large market cap companies. As of December 31, 2023, Autoliv estimates that approximately 36% of outstand- ing shares were SDRs (vs. 49% a year earlier) while 64% were common stock (vs. 51% a year earlier). In 2023, ap- proximately 84% of total volume was traded on the NYSE. During 2023, the number of shares outstanding decreased by more than 3.5 million to 82.6 million (excluding treasury shares). Stock options (if exercised) and granted restricted stock units and performance shares could increase the number of shares outstanding by 0.3 million shares in to- tal. Combined, this would add 0.4% to the Autoliv shares outstanding. Ownership distribution of institutional investors The largest shareholders, December 31st, 2023 1) Rest of Europe 11% Rest of World 3% 1. Cevian Capital United States 43% 2. Fidelity Management & Research Company 3. BlackRock 4. Alecta 1) Shareholders holding more than 5% at the end of 2023, based on the 13-D/G filings and company estimates, of outstanding shares United Kingdom 10% Sweden 33% Company estimates, end of 2023. 11% 7% 6% 6% 67 BOARD AND MANAGEMENT 4 10 11 5 3 2 7 1 9 8 6 Board of Directors 1. Jan Carlson Chairman since 2014. Director since 2007. 2. Mikael Bratt President and CEO of Autoliv Inc. Director since 2018. 3. Laurie Brlas Director since 2020. Member of the Audit and Risk Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. 4. Hasse Johansson Director since 2018. Member of the Audit and Risk Committee. 5. Leif Johansson Director since 2016. Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Member of the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee. 6. Franz-Josef Kortüm Director since 2014. Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. 7. Frédéric Lissalde Director since 2020. Chair of the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee. Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. 8. Xiaozhi Liu Director since 2011. Member of the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee. 9. Gustav Lundgren Director since 2022. Member of the Audit and Risk Committee. 10. Martin Lundstedt Director since 2021. Member of the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee. 11. Thaddeus “Ted” Senko Director since 2018. Chair of the Audit Committee. 68 7 2 11 8 12 1 6 4 3 5 10 9 Executive Management Team 1. Mikael Bratt President and CEO. Employed 2016. 2. Petra Albuschus Executive Vice President, Human Resources & Sustainability. Employed 2023. 3. Kevin Fox President, Autoliv Americas. Employed 1996. 4. Magnus Jarlegren President, Autoliv Europe. Employed 2019. 5. Jordi Lombarte Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer. Employed 1991. 6. Jonas Jademyr Executive Vice President, Quality and Program Management. Employed 2023. 7. Colin Naughton President, Autoliv Asia. Employed 1995. 8. Anthony Nellis Executive Vice President, Legal Affairs; General Counsel & Secretary. Employed 2002. 9. Staffan Olsson Acting Head of Operations. Employed 2020. 10. Christian Swahn Executive Vice President, Supply Chain Management. Employed 2019. 11. Fredrik Westin Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Employed 2020. 12. Sng Yih President, Autoliv China. Employed 2022. 69 Contacts and Calendar AUTOLIV, INC. Visiting address: Klarabergsviadukten 70, Section B, 7th Floor, Stockholm, Sweden Postal address: P.O. Box 70381, SE-107 24 Stockholm, Sweden Tel: +46 (0)8 587 20 600 E-mail: info@autoliv.com www.autoliv.com CONTACT OUR BOARD Autoliv, Inc. P.O. Box 70381, SE-107 24 Stockholm, Sweden Tel: +46 (0)8 587 20 600 E-mail: legalaffairs@autoliv.com The Board, individual directors and the committees of the Board can be contacted using the address above. Contact can be made anonymously and communication with individual directors is not screened. The relevant chairman receives all such communication after it has been determined that the content represents a message to such chairman. STOCK TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR www.computershare.com INVESTOR REQUESTS Autoliv, Inc., P.O. Box 70381, SE-107 24, Stockholm, Sweden Tel: +46 (0)8 587 20 600 E-mail: ir@autoliv.com 2024 PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL CALENDAR April 26, Financial Report Q1 May 10, Annual Stockholders Meeting July 19, Financial Report Q2 October 18, Financial Report Q3 Concept and Design: PCG Photos: Christian Wyrwa, Jason Loudermilk Photography, Kun Li, Getty Images, Shutterstock, JiaJia Zhuang, Björn Nilsson Graphics, NYSE, Spectrum Digitale Medien GmbH, Autoliv colleagues 70 Contacts and Calendar Multi-Year Financial Summary (Dollars in millions, except per share data, unaudited) 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Sales and Income Net sales Airbag sales1) Seatbelt sales Operating income Net income attributable to controlling interest Earnings per share – basic Earnings per share – assuming dilution2) Gross margin3) S,G&A in relation to sales R,D&E net in relation to sales Operating margin4) Adjusted operating margin5,6) Balance Sheet Trade working capital7) Trade working capital in relation to sales8) Receivables outstanding in relation to sales9) Inventory outstanding in relation to sales10) Payables outstanding in relation to sales11) Total equity Total parent shareholders’ equity per share Current assets excluding cash Property, plant and equipment, net Intangible assets (primarily goodwill) Capital employed Net debt6) Total assets Long-term debt Return on capital employed12) Return on total equity13) Total equity ratio Cash flow and other data Operating Cash flow Depreciation and amortization Capital expenditures, net Capital expenditures, net in relation to sales Free Cash flow6,14) Cash conversion6,15) Direct shareholder return16) Cash dividends paid per share Number of shares outstanding (millions)17) Number of employees, December 31 $10,475 $8,842 $8,230 7,055 3,420 690 488 5.74 5.72 17.4% (4.8)% (4.1)% 6.6% 8.8% 1,232 11.2% 20.0% 9.2% 18.0% 2,570 30.93 3,475 2,192 1,385 3,937 1,367 8,332 1,324 17.7% 19.0% 31% 982 378 569 5.4% 414 85% 577 5,807 3,035 659 423 4.86 4.85 15.8% (4.9)% (4.4)% 7.5% 6.8% 1,183 12.7% 20.4% 10.4% 18.1% 2,626 30.30 3,119 1,960 1,382 3,810 1,184 7,717 1,054 17.5% 16.3% 34% 713 363 485 5.5% 228 54% 339 5,380 2,850 675 435 4.97 4.96 18.4% (5.3)% (4.7)% 8.2% 8.3% 1,332 15.7% 20.0% 9.2% 13.5% 2,648 30.10 2,705 1,855 1,395 3,700 1,052 7,537 1,662 18.3% 17.1% 35% 754 394 454 5.5% 300 69% 165 $7,447 4,824 2,623 382 187 2.14 2.14 16.7% (5.2)% (5.0)% 5.1% 6.5% 1,366 13.6% 18.1% 7.9% 12.5% 2,423 27.56 3,091 1,869 1,412 3,637 1,214 8,157 2,110 10.0% 9.0% 30% 849 371 340 4.6% 509 270% 54 $8,548 5,676 2,871 726 462 5.29 5.29 18.5% (4.7)% (4.7)% 8.5% 9.1% 1,417 16.2% 18.6% 8.5% 10.8% 2,122 24.19 2,557 1,816 1,410 3,772 1,650 6,771 1,726 20.0% 23.0% 31% 641 351 476 5.6% 165 36% 217 2.66 2.58 1.88 0.62 2.48 82.6 86.2 87.5 87.4 87.2 62,900 61,700 55,900 61,000 58,900 1) Including steering wheels, inflators and initiators. 2) Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares. 3) Gross profit relative to sales. 4) Operating income relative to sales. 5) Excluding effects from capacity alignments, antitrust related matters and Andrews litigation settlement. 6) Non-U.S. GAAP measure, for reconciliation see Financial Report October – December 2023 filed with Form 8-K on January 26, 2024. 7) Outstanding receivables and outstanding inventory less outstanding payables. 8) Outstanding receivables and outstanding inventory less outstanding payables relative to annualized fourth quarter sales. 9) Outstanding receivables relative to annualized fourth quarter sales. 10) Outstanding inventory relative to annualized fourth quarter sales. 11) Outstanding payables relative to annualized fourth quarter sales. 12) Operating income and income from equity method investments, relative to average capital employed. 13) Income relative to average total equity. 14) Operating cash flow less Capital expenditures, net. 15) Free cash flow relative to Net income. 16) Dividends paid and Shares repurchased. 17) At year end, excluding dilution and net of treasury shares. 71 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _________ to _________ Commission file number: 001-12933 AUTOLIV, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) Klarabergsviadukten 70, Section B7, Box 70381, Stockholm, Sweden (Address of principal executive offices) 51-0378542 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) SE-107 24 (Zip Code) +46 8 587 20 600 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class: Common Stock (par value $1.00 per share) Trading Symbol(s): ALV Name of each exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes: ☒ No: ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes: ☒ No: ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Emerging growth company ☒ ☐ ☐ Accelerated filer Smaller reporting company ☐ ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262 (b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒ If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes: ☐ No: ☒ The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of Autoliv, Inc. held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter of 2023 amounted to $7,260 million. Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 12, 2024: 82,646,049. Auditor Firm Id: 1433 Auditor Name: Ernst & Young AB Auditor Location: Stockholm, Sweden Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the annual stockholders’ meeting to be held on May 10, 2024, to be dated on or around March 25, 2024 (the “2024 Proxy Statement”), are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The 2024 Proxy Statement will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2023. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Business Risk Factors Unresolved Staff Comments Cybersecurity Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures AUTOLIV, INC. Index PART I PART II Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities [Reserved] Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Controls and Procedures Other Information Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 1C. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9. Item 9A. Item 9B. PART III Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Compensation Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Principal Accountant Fees and Services Item 15. Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules PART IV 3 10 21 22 24 27 27 28 30 49 51 88 88 89 90 90 90 90 90 91 1 NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements that are not historical facts but rather forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include those that address activities, events or developments that Autoliv, Inc. (“Autoliv,” the “Company” or “we”) or its management believes or anticipates may occur in the future. All forward-looking statements are based upon our current expectations, various assumptions and/or data available from third parties. Our expectations and assumptions are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, there can be no assurance that such forward-looking statements will materialize or prove to be correct as forward-looking statements are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual future results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the future results, performance or achievements expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes,” “may,” “likely,” “might,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, the outcome could differ materially from those set out in the forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including without limitation: general economic conditions, including inflation; changes in light vehicle production; fluctuation in vehicle production schedules for which the Company is a supplier; global supply chain disruptions including port, transportation and distribution delays or interruptions; supply chain disruptions and component shortages specific to the automotive industry or the Company; disruptions and impacts relating to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and the ongoing conflict in the Red Sea; changes in general industry and market conditions or regional growth or decline; changes in and the successful execution of our capacity alignments: restructuring, cost reduction, and efficiency initiatives and the market reaction thereto; loss of business from increased competition; higher raw material, fuel, and energy costs; changes in consumer and customer preferences for end products; customer losses; changes in regulatory conditions; customer bankruptcies, consolidations or restructuring or divestiture of customer brands; unfavorable fluctuations in currencies or interest rates among the various jurisdictions in which we operate; component shortages; market acceptance of our new products; costs or difficulties related to the integration of any new or acquired businesses and technologies; continued uncertainty in pricing and other negotiations with customers; successful integration of acquisitions and operations of joint ventures; successful implementation of strategic partnerships and collaborations; our ability to be awarded new business; product liability, warranty and recall claims and investigations and other litigation, civil judgments or financial penalties and customer reactions thereto; higher expenses for our pension and other postretirement benefits, including higher funding needs for our pension plans; work stoppages or other labor issues; possible adverse results of pending or future litigation or infringement claims, and the availability of insurance with respect to such matters; our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; negative impacts of antitrust investigations or other governmental investigations and associated litigation relating to the conduct of our business; tax assessments by governmental authorities and changes in our effective tax rate; dependence on key personnel; legislative or regulatory changes impacting or limiting our business; our ability to meet our sustainability targets, goals and commitments; political conditions; dependence on and relationships with customers and suppliers; the conditions necessary to hit our financial targets; and other risks and uncertainties identified in Item 1A -“Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 1A, and Item 7 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report. For any forward-looking statements contained in this or any other document, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we assume no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events, except as required by law. 2 Item 1. Business General PART I Autoliv, Inc. (“Autoliv”, the “Company” or “we”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices in Stockholm, Sweden where it currently employs approximately 105 people. The Company functions as a holding corporation and owns two principal subsidiaries, Autoliv AB and Autoliv ASP, Inc. The Company's fiscal year ends on December 31. The Company is a leading developer, manufacturer, and supplier of passive safety systems to the automotive industry with a broad range of product offerings. Passive safety systems are primarily meant to improve safety for occupants in a vehicle. Passive safety systems include modules and components for frontal-impact airbag protection systems, side-impact airbag protection systems, seatbelts, steering wheels, inflator technologies, and battery cut-off switches. To expand its product offerings, the Company has formed Mobility Safety Solutions. By combining its core competence and industry experience, the Company also develops and manufactures mobility safety solutions such as pedestrian protection, battery cut-off switches, connected safety services, and safety solutions for riders of powered two-wheelers. The Company has 63 production facilities in 23 countries and its customers include the world’s largest car manufacturers. The Company’s sales in 2023 were $10.5 billion, approximately 67% of which consisted of airbag and steering wheel products and approximately 33% of which consisted of seatbelt products. The Company's business is conducted in the following geographical regions: The Americas, Europe, China, and Asia, excluding China. On December 31, 2023, the Company had approximately 70,300 personnel worldwide, with 11% being temporary personnel. Additional information required by this Item 1 regarding developments in the Company’s business during 2023 is contained under Item 7 in this Annual Report. Reportable Segment The Company has one reportable segment based on the way the Company evaluates its financial performance and manages its operations. The Company's business is comprised of passive safety products –principally airbags (including steering wheels and inflators) and seatbelts. For more information regarding the Company’s segment reporting, see Note 1, Basis of Presentation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. Products, Market, and Competition Products Providing life-saving solutions is a key priority as the world population grows and develops. However, population expansion in growth markets and the rise of megacities creates new complexities. To meet this challenge, the Company develops safety solutions for both mobility and society that work in real life situations. The Company's passive safety systems such as seatbelts and airbags substantially mitigate human consequences of traffic accidents. The airbag module is designed to inflate extremely rapidly and then quickly deflate during a collision or impact. It consists of the container, an airbag cushion, and an inflator. The purpose of the airbag is to provide the occupants a cushioning and restraint during a crash event to prevent any impact or impact-caused injuries between the occupant and the interior of the vehicle. Seatbelts can reduce the overall risk of serious injuries in frontal crashes by as much as 60% due to advanced seatbelt technologies such as pretensioners and load limiters. The Company also manufactures steering wheels that are crafted to ensure they meet safety requirements and are functional as well as stylish. Market and Competition Consumer research clearly shows that consumers want safe vehicles, and several significant trends are likely to positively influence overall safety content per vehicle. These include: 1) Society becoming increasingly focused on Vision Zero and its goal of reducing traffic fatalities and their associated costs; 2) Demographic trends of increased urbanization, aging driver populations, and increased safety focus in growth markets; 3) Evolving government regulations and test rating systems to improve the safety of vehicles in various markets, such as the updated European New Car Assessment Program (Euro NCAP), China NCAP, and USNCAP; and 4) The trend towards more electrical vehicles may lead to roomier interiors that may require more advanced passive safety systems, as well as products to cut the electrical power in case of an accident. The automotive passive safety market is driven by two primary factors: light vehicle production (LVP) and content per vehicle (CPV). 3 The first growth driver, LVP, has increased at an average annual growth rate of around 1.9% since the start of Autoliv in 1997 despite the substantial headwinds from recent supply chain disruptions and semiconductor shortages, including in 2022. According to S&P Global, LVP is forecasted to grow to close to 90 million by 2026 from approximately 87 million in 2023, due to growing demand and export in medium- and low-income markets. Unlike LVP, where Autoliv can only aim to be on the best-selling platforms, Autoliv can influence CPV more directly by continuously developing and introducing new technologies with higher value-added features. Over the long term, this increases average safety CPV and has caused the Company's markets to grow faster than the LVP. Since 1997, the Company’s sales compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for passive safety has been around 5% compared to the market rate of around 2.8% which includes an LVP growth of around 1.9%. The Company's outperformance is a result of a steady flow of new passive safety technologies, strong focus on quality and a superior global footprint both in products and engineering. This has enabled Autoliv to increase its global market share in passive safety from 27% in 1997 to around 45% in 2023. In high-income markets (Western Europe, North America, Japan, and South Korea) the average CPV is around $330. CPV growth in these regions mainly come from new safety systems such as active seatbelts, knee airbags, and front-center airbags along with improved protection for pedestrians and rear-seat occupants like bag-in-belt or more advanced seatbelts. In medium- and low-income markets (all markets other than the markets above), the Company sees great opportunities for CPV growth from more airbags and advanced seatbelt products. Average CPV in these markets is around $200 or almost $130 less than in the high- income markets. As a result of higher installation rates of airbags, more advanced seatbelt products, and more complex steering wheels, CPV is expected to increase at a similar pace in both high-income and medium- and low-income markets over the next three years. In the next three years all LVP growth is expected to come in medium- and low-income regions with lower CPV, leading to a dilution of the average global CPV. Despite this negative regional LVP mix effect, the annual passive safety market (seatbelts and airbags, including steering wheels), is expected to grow from around $23 billion in 2023 to more than $25 billion over the next three years, based on the current macro-economic outlook and the Company's internal market intelligence and estimates. The highest growth rate is expected in steering wheels, where Autoliv has a global market share of around 40%, generated by the trend toward higher-value steering wheels with leather and additional features. In seatbelts, Autoliv has reached a global market share of around 45%, primarily due to being the technology leader with several important innovations such as pretensioners and active seatbelts. The Company's strong market position is also a reflection of its superior global footprint. Seatbelts are the primary life-saving safety product globally and are also an important requirement in low-end vehicles in the medium- and low-income markets. This provides the Company with an excellent opportunity to benefit from the expected growth in this segment of the market. The market for airbags, where Autoliv has a global market share of around 47%, is expected to grow mainly as result of higher installation rates of inflatable curtains, side airbags, and knee airbags. Additionally, the front center airbag is expected to start to contribute to the market growth. The Company's ability to consistently outperform market growth is rooted in a steady flow of new safety technologies, a strong focus on quality, and a superior production and engineering footprint. The Company's competitors Autoliv is the clear market leader in passive safety components and systems for the automotive industry with an estimated global market share of around 45%. ZF, one of the Company's largest competitors, is a global leader in driveline and chassis technology as well as in passive safety technologies and is one of the largest global automotive suppliers. Another large competitor is Joyson Safety Systems (JSS), a subsidiary of Ningbo Joyson Electronic Corp. JSS is the result of the merger between Key Safety Systems (KSS) and Takata Corporation after KSS acquired Takata in 2018. In Japan, Brazil, South Korea, and China, there are a number of local suppliers that have close ties with the domestic vehicle manufacturers. For example, Toyota uses “keiretsu” (in-house) suppliers Tokai Rika for seatbelts and Toyoda Gosei for airbags and steering wheels. These suppliers generally receive most of the Toyota business in Japan, in the same way, Mobis, a major supplier to Hyundai/Kia in South Korea, generally receives a significant part of their business. Other competitors include Nihon Plast and Ashimori in Japan, Yanfeng and Jinheng in China, Samsong in South Korea, and Chris Cintos de Seguranca in South America. Collectively, these competitors account for the majority of the remaining market share in passive safety. Additional information concerning the Company's products, markets and competition is included in the “Risks and Risk Management” section under Item 7 of this Annual Report. 4 Manufacturing and Production See “Item 2. Properties” for a description of Autoliv’s principal properties. The component factories manufacture inflators, propellant, initiators, textile cushions, webbing, pressed steel parts, springs, and overmolded steel parts used in seatbelt and airbag assembly and steering wheels. The assembly factories source components from a number of parties, including Autoliv’s own component factories, and assemble complete restraint systems for “just-in-time” delivery to customers. The products manufactured by Autoliv’s consolidated subsidiaries in 2023 consisted of 148 million complete seatbelt systems (of which 100 million were fitted with pretensioners), 127 million side airbags (including curtain airbags and front center airbags), 63 million frontal airbags, 6 million other airbags and 22 million steering wheels. Autoliv’s “just-in-time” delivery system is designed to accommodate the specific requirements of each customer for low levels of inventory and rapid stock delivery service. “Just-in-time” deliveries require final assembly or, at least, distribution centers in geographic areas close to customers to facilitate rapid delivery. The fact that the major automobile manufacturers are continually expanding their production activities into more countries and require the same or similar safety systems as those produced in Europe, Japan, or the U.S. increases the importance for suppliers to have assembly capacity in several countries. Consolidation among the Company's customers also supports this trend. Autoliv’s assembly operations generally are not constrained by capacity considerations unless there is a disruption in the supply of raw materials and components. When dramatic shifts in LVP occur, Autoliv can generally adjust capacity in response to any changes in demand within a few days by adding or removing work shifts and within a few months by adding or removing standardized production and assembly lines. Most of Autoliv’s assembly factories can make sufficient space available to accommodate additional production lines to satisfy foreseeable increases in capacity. As a result, Autoliv can usually adjust its manufacturing capacity faster than its customers can adjust their capacity as a result of fluctuations in the general demand for vehicles or in the demand for a specific vehicle model, provided that customers promptly notify Autoliv when they become aware of such changes in demand. However, these types of adjustments can be costly and can impact Autoliv's operating margin. When significant volatility in LVP occur, as we have seen in 2022 and 2023 due to supply disruptions, or when there is a shift in regional LVP, the capacity adjustments can take more time and be more costly. Currently, the volatility of LVP and orders from the Company, while more stable, continue to be more volatile than prior to the Covid-19 pandemic. Additionally, when there is significant demand for a given product due to a major recall of a competitor’s product, like certain of the Company's customers have experienced, capacity adjustments may take time. The Company could experience disruption in its supply or delivery chain, which could cause one or more of its customers to halt or delay production. For more information, see Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. Quality Management Autoliv believes that superior quality is a prerequisite to being considered a leading global supplier of automotive safety systems and is key to the Company's financial performance, because quality excellence is critical for winning new orders, preventing recalls, and maintaining low scrap rates. Autoliv has for many years emphasized a “zero-defect” proactive quality policy and continues to strive to improve its working methods. Autoliv’s products are expected to always meet performance expectations and be delivered to its customers at the right times and in the right amounts. The Company believes its continued quality improvements further enhance the Company's reputation among its customers, employees, and governmental authorities. Although quality has always been paramount in the automotive industry, especially for safety products, automobile manufacturers have become increasingly focused on quality with even less tolerance for any deviations. This intensified focus on quality is partially due to an increase in the number of vehicle recalls for a variety of reasons (not just safety), including a few high-profile vehicle recalls. This trend is likely to continue as automobile manufacturers introduce even stricter quality requirements and regulating agencies and other authorities increase the level of scrutiny given to vehicle safety issues. The Company has not been immune to the recalls that have been impacting the automotive industry. The Company continues to drive its quality initiative called “Q5,” which was initiated in the summer of 2010. It is an integral part of the Company's strategy of shaping a proactive quality culture of zero defects. It is called “Q5” because it addresses quality in five dimensions: products, customers, growth, behavior, and suppliers. The goal of Q5 is to firmly tie together quality with value within all of the Company's processes and for all of its employees, thereby leading to the best value for its customers. Since 2010, the Company has continually focused on this quality initiative to provide additional skills training to more employees and suppliers. These activities have significantly improved the Company's quality performance. In the Company's pursuit of quality excellence, the Company developed a chain of four “defense lines” to deal with potential quality issues. The defense lines are: 1) robust product designs, 2) flawless components from suppliers and the Company's own in-house component companies, 3) manufacturing flawless products with a system for verifying that the Company's products conform with specifications, and 4) an advanced traceability system in the event of a recall. The Company's pursuit of quality excellence extends from the earliest phases of product development to the proper disposal of a product following many years of use in a vehicle. Autoliv’s comprehensive Autoliv Product Development System (“APS”) includes several key check points during the process of developing new products that are designed to ensure that such products are well-built and have no hidden defects. Through this process, the Company works closely with its suppliers and customers to set clear standards that help to ensure robust component design and lowest cost for function in order to proactively prevent problems and ensure the Company delivers only the best designs to the market. 5 The APS, based on the goals of improving quality and efficiency, is at the core of Autoliv’s manufacturing philosophy. APS integrates essential quality elements, such as mistake proofing, statistical process control and operator involvement, into the manufacturing processes so all Autoliv associates are aware of and understand the critical connection between themselves and the Company's lifesaving products. This “zero-defect” principle extends beyond Autoliv to the entire supplier base. All of the Company's suppliers must accept the strict quality standards in the global Autoliv Supplier Manual, which defines the Company's quality requirements and focuses on preventing bad parts from being produced by its suppliers and helps eliminate defective intermediate products in the Company's assembly lines as early as possible. In addition, Autoliv’s One Product One Process (“1P1P”) initiative is its strategy for developing and managing standardization of both core products and customer-specific features, leading not only to improved quality, but also greater cost efficiency and more efficient supply chain management. IATF 16949:2016 is one of the automotive industry’s most widely used international standards for quality management. All Autoliv facilities that ship products to OEMs are regularly certified according to the International Automotive Task Force (IATF) standards. Environmental and Safety Regulations For information on how environmental and safety regulations impact the Company's business, see “Risk Factors – ‘Our business may be adversely affected by laws or regulations, including environmental, occupational health and safety, and other governmental regulations’, “Global climate change could negatively affect our business”, “Our goals, targets, and ambitions related to sustainability and emissions reduction, and our public statements and disclosures regarding them, expose us to numerous risks” and “Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market”” in Item 1A and “Risks and Risk Management” in Item 7 of this Annual Report. Climate change The Company is committed to operating its business in an environmentally sustainable manner, meaning developing and producing products in a resource efficient way while limiting the Company's environmental impact in the most material areas of greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, waste, and water. With particular emphasis on climate action, the Company actively engages with its customers, suppliers, and others to drive sustainable mobility. In June 2021, the Company launched an updated climate strategy including new long-term climate ambitions: • • Carbon neutrality in own operations by 2030, and Net-zero emissions across our supply chain by 2040 These industry-leading climate ambitions are aligned with a 1.5°C trajectory and should position the Company as the supplier of choice for the most climate-focused customers, helping to ensure the Company's competitiveness now and in the future. In addition to these ambitions, the Company adopted Science Based Targets (SBTs) for 2030 covering its own operations as well as the supply chain. The targets were approved in January 2022 and are available at the SBTi website. For more information about how climate change impacts the Company's business, see "Risk factors – Global climate change could negatively affect our business” in Item 1A of this Annual Report. Raw Materials Direct material purchased from external suppliers represents approximately 55% of the Company's net sales in 2023. The Company mainly purchases manufactured components and raw materials for its operations. The Company takes several actions to manage the raw material fluctuations, such as competitive sourcing and looking for alternative materials. The Company is also taking necessary actions to gradually implement raw materials with a lower carbon emission footprint. For information on the sources and availability of raw materials, see "Operational Risks - Component costs" in Item 7 and “Risk Factors – Changes in the source, cost, availability of, and regulations pertaining to raw materials and components may adversely affect our profit margins” in Item 1A of this Annual Report. Intellectual Property The Company has developed a considerable amount of proprietary technology related to automotive safety systems and relies on many patents to protect such technology. The Company's intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining its competitive position in a number of the markets the Company serves. For information on the Company's use of intellectual property and its importance to the Company, see “Risk Factors – If our patents are declared invalid or our technology infringes on the proprietary rights of others, our ability to compete may be impaired” in Item 1A of this Annual Report. 6 Backlog The Company has frame contracts with automobile manufacturers and such contracts are typically entered into up to three years before the start of production of the relevant car model or platform and provide for a term covering the life of such car model or platform including service parts after a vehicle model is no longer produced. These contracts, however, do not typically provide minimum quantities, firm prices, or exclusivity but instead permit the automobile manufacturer to resource the relevant products at given intervals (or at any time) from other suppliers. We sometimes refer to this backlog as our order intake or order book. For more information about order intake see “Risk Factors – The cyclical nature of automotive sales and production can adversely affect our business. Our business is directly related to LVP in the global market and by our customers, and automotive sales and LVP are the most important drivers for our sales” in Item 1A of this Annual Report. Dependence on Customers In 2023, the Company's top five customers represented around 48% of its consolidated sales and the Company's top ten customers represented around 78% of its consolidated sales. This reflects the concentration of manufacturers in the automotive industry. The five largest OEMs in 2023 accounted for around 46% of global LVP, and the ten largest OEMs accounted for around 66% of global LVP. A delivery contract is typically for the lifetime of a vehicle model, which is normally between five and seven years depending on customer platform sourcing preferences and strategies. For information on the Company's dependence on customers, see “Risk Factors – Our business could be materially and adversely affected if we lost any of our largest customers or if they were unable to pay their invoices” in Item 1A of this Annual Report, and “Dependence on Customers” under the section “Strategic Risks” in Item 7 of this Annual Report, and Note 19 “Segment Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements Customer sales trends Asian vehicle producers have steadily become increasingly important, mainly driven by growth with Japanese and Chinese OEMs. As a group they represented around 44% of global sales in 2023, of which Japanese OEMs accounts for more than two thirds. This is a result of the Company's stronger market position based on its local presence in Japan. The Chinese OEMs as a group accounted for around 6% of the Company's global sales in 2023, with Great Wall representing more than 1% of the Company's global sales. European based brands accounted for 29% of the Company's global sales in 2023. The U.S. based OEMs (including Chrysler and new EV manufactures) accounted for 23% of the Company's global sales in 2023. Globally one of the Company's strongest growing customers from 2022 to 2023 was Honda, closely followed by Toyota. Research, Development and Engineering, net (R,D&E) No single customer project accounted for more than 4% of Autoliv’s total R,D&E, net spending during 2023. To support Autoliv’s product portfolio, additional expertise is brought in-house via technology partnerships and licensing agreements. During 2023, gross expenditures for R,D&E amounted to $618 million compared to $595 million in 2022. Of these amounts, $193 million in 2023 and $205 million in 2022 were related to customer-funded engineering projects and crash tests reimbursed by the customers. Net of this income, R,D&E expenditures in 2023 was $425 million compared to $390 million in 2022. Of the R,D&E, net expense in 2023, 85% was for projects and programs where the Company has customer orders, typically related to vehicle models in development. The remaining 15% was mainly for new innovations, products and standardizations that will yield benefits over time. Regulatory Costs The fitting of seatbelts in most types of motor vehicles is mandatory in almost all countries and many countries have strict laws regarding the use of seatbelts while in vehicles. In addition, most developed countries require that seats in intercity buses and commercial vehicles be fitted with seatbelts. In the U.S., federal legislation requires frontal airbags on the driver-side and the passenger-side of all new passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and vans. For information concerning the material effects on the Company's business relating to its compliance with government safety regulations, see “Risk Factors – ‘Our business may be adversely affected by laws or regulations, including environmental, occupational health and safety, and other governmental regulations’ and ‘Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market’” in Item 1A of this Annual Report and in Item 7 under the section “Risks and Risk Management” of this Annual Report. 7 Human Capital Management The Company's drive for excellence is what makes Autoliv the world’s leading supplier of automotive safety systems. From the earliest stages of product development to sales and design to the final delivery of the finished product, Autoliv's employees are driven by the Company's mission to Save More Lives. The successful execution of the Company's strategies relies on its ability to shape a quality and performance-oriented culture, and to adapt quickly to sudden shifts in its circumstances, such as supply chain disruptions and geopolitical instability. As the Company moves forward its workforce (employees plus temporary personnel) strives to respond with agility to new possibilities to grow and improve the Company's business whilst delivering with excellence to its customers. The Company builds a winning team by focusing on creating a work environment that attracts, retains, and engages its employees. The table below shows the Company's total workforce as of December 31, 2023, and 2022. Total workforce Whereof: Direct workforce in manufacturing Indirect workforce Temporary workforce Diversity and Inclusion 2023 2022 70,300 52,500 17,800 11% 69,100 50,600 18,500 11% When attracting, developing and retaining talent, the Company seeks individuals who hold varied experiences and viewpoints to create an inclusive and diverse workplace that allows each employee to do their best work and drive the Company's collective success. The Company's workforce reflects the diversity of the countries and cultures in which it operates. At the end of 2023, 49% of the Company's workforce and 20% of the Company's senior management positions were held by women. The Company has operations in 25 countries, with 18% of its workforce located in Asia (excluding China), 31% in the Americas, 14% in China, and 37% in Europe (including South Africa, Tunisia and Turkey). The table below show the Company's workforce by age group and gender in % at the end of 2023. % of Men 1% 5% 10% 18% 15% 2% Age group >60 51-60 41-50 31-40 21-30 <20 % of Women 1% 5% 11% 16% 14% 2% Talent Attraction, Development, and Retention The Company believes that attraction, development, and retention of talent is essential to its success, especially in today's environment. The Company offers an inclusive work environment where its employees are challenged and achieve great things together. Supporting the development of the employees is essential in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment. An important cornerstone of each employee’s growth is the ongoing dialogue between the team member and manager, which is summarized during an annual Performance and Development Dialogue (PDD). During the year, 99% of targeted employees conducted a PDD with their managers. To provide opportunities for professional and personal growth of the employees, the Company has a multitude of development channels, including technical and specialist career paths, international assignments, and other such programs. The Company provides market-based competitive compensation through its salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentive programs and benefits packages that promote employee well-being across all aspects of their lives. Health and Safety The Company is committed to providing a zero accident work environment that promotes the health, safety, and welfare of its employees. Autoliv’s production facilities implement the Company's health and safety management system, which is supported by leadership teams. Implementation of the system as well as the ISO 45001 health and safety management system is monitored through internal and external audits. At the end of 2023, 61% of production facilities were certified according to ISO 45001. The Company further supports employees’ health and well-being by providing the means necessary to allow many of its employees to work remotely. 8 Labor Relations The Company offers fair terms and conditions of employment. The Company's overall purpose, Code of Conduct, talent development strategies, and employment policies support the principles in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Labor Organization’s Fundamental Principles and Labor Standards. The Company considers its relationship with its employees to be good. While there have been a small number of minor labor disputes historically, such disputes have not had a significant or lasting impact on the Company's relationship with its employees, and customer perception of its employee practices or its business results. Major unions in Europe to which some of the Company's employees belong include: IG Metall in Germany; Unite the union in the United Kingdom; Confédération Générale des Travailleurs (CGT), Confédération Française Démocratique du Travail (CFDT), Confédération Française de l’Encadrement Confédération Générale des cadres (CFE-CGC), Force Ouvrière (FO), Confédération Française des Travailleurs Chrétiens (CFTC), Solidaires, Unitaires, Démocratiques (SUD) and Conféderation Autonome du Travail (CAT) in France; Union General de Trabajadores (UGT), Union Sindical Obrera (USO), Comisiones Obereras (CCOO) and Confederacion General de Trabajadores (CGT) in Spain; IF Metall, Unionen, Sveriges Ingenjörer and Ledarna in Sweden; Industriaal- ja Metallitöötajate Ametiühingute Liit (IMTAL) in Estonia; Vasas Szakszervezeti Szövetség (Hungarian Metallworkers‘ Federation) in Hungary; Samorzadny NiezalezĪny Zwiazek Zawodowy Pracownikow and Zakladowa Organizacja Związkowa NSZZ Solidarnosc in Poland; National Union of Metal Workers South Africa (NUMSA) in South Africa; Union Générale des Travailleurs Tunisiens (UGTT) and Union des travailleurs Tunisiens (UTT) in Tunisia, and Türk Metal Sendikasi in Turkey. In addition, the Company’s employees in other regions are represented by the following unions: Unifor in Canada; Sindicato de Jornaleros y Obreros Industriales y de la Industria Maquiladora de H.Matamoros, Tamaulipas (CTM); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria Metalúrgica y Similares, Federación Valle de Toluca (CTM); Sindicato Nacional “Nueva Cultura Laboral” de trabajadores de la fabricación, manufactura, ensamble de autopartes mecánicas y eléctricas y componentes de la Industria Automotriz, C.R.O.C.; Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria Arnesera, Eléctrica, Automotriz y Aeronáutica de la República Mexicana; “Nueva Cultura Laboral” “de trabajadores de la fabricación, manufactura, ensamble de autopartes mecánicas y eléctricas y componentes de la industria Automotriz (CROC); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria de Autopartes en General y/o Similares, Conexos y sus Servicios de la República Mexicana, in Mexico; Sindicato Industrial de Trabajadores de la Transformación, Construcción, Automotriz, Agropecuaria, Plásticos y de la Industria en General, del Comercio y Servicios, Similares, anexos y conexos del Estado de Querétaro “Ángel Castillo Resendiz”; Sindicato dos Metalúrgicos de Taubaté e Região in Brazil; Autoliv India Employees Association, Bangalore & Mysore in India; Korean Metal Workers Union (FKTU) in South Korea; Autoliv Japan Roudou Kumiai in Japan, and All-China Federation of Trade Unions in China. In many European countries, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and South Korea, wages, salaries and general working conditions are negotiated with local unions and/or are subject to centrally negotiated collective bargaining agreements. The terms of the Company's various agreements with unions typically range between one to three years. Some of the Company's subsidiaries in Europe, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and South Korea must negotiate with the applicable local unions with respect to important changes in operations, working and employment conditions. Twice a year, members of the Company’s management conduct a meeting with the European Works Council (EWC) to provide employee representatives with important information about the Company and a forum for the exchange of ideas and opinions. In many Asia Pacific countries, the central or regional governments provide guidance each year for salary adjustments or statutory minimum wage for workers. The Company's employees may join associations in accordance with local legislation and rules, although the level of unionization varies significantly throughout its operations. Available Information The Company files or furnishes with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) periodic reports and amendments thereto, which include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and other information. Such reports, amendments, proxy statements, and other information are made available free of charge on the Company's corporate website at www.autoliv.com and are available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with the SEC. The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters, code of conduct, and other documents governing the Company are also available on its corporate website at www.autoliv.com. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy statements and other information at www.sec.gov. Hard copies of the above-mentioned documents can be obtained free of charge by contacting the Company at: Autoliv, Inc., P.O. Box 70381, SE-107 24, Stockholm, Sweden. 9 Item 1A. Risk Factors Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows may be impacted by a number of factors. A discussion of the risks associated with these material risk factors is included below. RISKS RELATED TO GEOPOLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS Although we have minimal operations in Russia no operations in the Middle East, we face risks related to the war in Ukraine and the Red Sea Conflict, which has had, and is expected to continue to have, an adverse impact on our business and financial performance The macro-economic uncertainty has been exacerbated by the war in Ukraine, the war in Israel/Gaza and the Red Sea Conflict. Although the length and impact of the ongoing war/conflicts is highly unpredictable, it exacerbated volatility in commodity prices, energy prices, inflationary pressures, credit markets, foreign exchange rates and supply chain disruptions. Furthermore, governments in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and European Union have each imposed export controls on certain products and financial and economic sanctions on certain industry sectors and parties in Russia. Existing or additional sanctions could further adversely affect the global economy and further disrupt the global supply chain. Inflation is also currently high world-wide and may continue for an unforeseen time. Due in part to the negative impact of the war in Ukraine, we have experienced exacerbated increases in raw materials and increased costs for transportation, energy, and commodities. Although have negotiated and continue to negotiate with our customers with respect to these additional costs, commercial negotiations with our customers may not be successful or may not offset all of the adverse impact of higher transportation, energy and commodity costs. Additionally, even if we are successful with respect to negotiations with customers relating to cost increases, there may be delay before we recover any increased costs. These may have a material negative impact on our business and results of operations. RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY The cyclical nature of automotive sales and production can adversely affect our business. Our business is directly related to LVP in the global market and by our customers, and automotive sales and LVP are the most important drivers for our sales Automotive sales and production are highly cyclical and can be affected by general or regional economic or industry conditions, the level of consumer demand, recalls and other safety issues, labor relations issues, technological changes, fuel prices and availability, vehicle safety regulations and other regulatory requirements, governmental initiatives, trade agreements, political volatility (especially in energy producing countries and growth markets), changes in interest rate levels and credit availability, and other factors. Some regions around the world may at various times be more particularly impacted by these factors than other regions. Economic declines that result in a significant reduction in automotive sales and production by our customers have in the past had, and may in the future have, a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Our sales are also affected by inventory levels of our customers. We cannot predict when our customers will decide to either increase or reduce inventory levels or whether new inventory levels will approximate historical inventory levels. This may exacerbate variability in our production schedules and order intake and, as a result, our revenues and financial condition. Uncertainty regarding inventory levels may be exacerbated by consumer financing programs initiated or terminated by our customers or governments as such changes may affect the timing of their sales. Changes in automotive sales and LVP and/or customers’ inventory levels will have an impact on our financial targets, earnings guidance, and estimates. In addition, we base our growth projections in part on business awards, or order intake, made by our customers. However, actual production orders from our customers may not approximate the awarded business or our estimated order intake. Any significant reduction in automotive sales and/or LVP by our customers, whether due to general economic conditions or any other factors relevant to sales or LVP, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Growth rates in safety content per vehicle, which can be impacted by changes in consumer trends, political decisions, crash test ratings and safety regulations could affect our results in the future The Company estimates that the average global content of passive safety systems per light vehicle increased in 2023 to around $261. Vehicles produced in different markets may have various passive safety content values. For example, in high-income markets, the premium vehicle segment has an average passive safety content values of over $350 per vehicle, whereas in growth markets such as China and India the average passive safety content per vehicle is approximately $209 and $104, respectively. Due to the majority of the growth in global LVP over time being concentrated in growth markets, our operating results may be impacted if the passive safety content per vehicle remains low and if the penetration of automotive safety systems does not increase in these regions. As passive safety content per vehicle is also an indicator of our sales development, should these trends continue, the average value of passive safety systems per vehicle could decline. We operate in a highly competitive market The market for passive safety systems is highly competitive. We compete with a number of other companies that produce and sell similar products. Among other factors, our products compete on the basis of price, quality, manufacturing and distribution capability, design and performance, technological innovation, delivery, and service. Some of our competitors are subsidiaries (or divisions, units or similar) of companies that are larger and have greater financial and other resources than us. Some of our competitors may also have a “preferred status” as a result of special relationships or ownership interests with certain customers. Our ability to compete successfully depends, in large part, on our success in continuing to innovate and manufacture products that have commercial success with our customer and end- consumers, differentiating our products from those of our competitors, continuing to deliver quality products in the time frames required by our customers, and maintaining best-cost production. We continue to invest in technology and innovation which we believe will be 10 critical to our long-term growth. Our ability to maintain and improve existing products, while successfully developing and introducing distinctive new and enhanced products that anticipate changing customer and consumer preferences and capitalize upon emerging technologies will be a significant factor in our ability to remain competitive. If we are unsuccessful or are less successful than our competitors in predicting the course of market development, developing innovative products, processes, and/or use of materials or adapting to new technologies or evolving regulatory, industry or customer requirements, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage. For example, our customers are increasingly focused on developing electric vehicles. If we fail to be awarded business on electric vehicle models, or these electric vehicles are not successful commercially, it will harm our future business prospects. Our competitive environment continues to change, including increased competition from entrants outside the traditional automotive industry, creating uncertainty about the future competitive landscape. Given the competitive nature of our business, the amount of awards we are awarded relative to our peers may decrease over time and our past order intake is not an indicator of future levels or order intake. Additionally, OEMs rigorously evaluate our performance and products against those of our competitors on the basis of product quality, reliability and cost-effectiveness. If one or more of our OEM customers determine that they could achieve overall better financial results by incorporating a competitor’s new or existing product, it could affect our ability to be competitive and may decrease our current market share. The inability to compete successfully could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. The discontinuation, lack of commercial success, or loss of business with respect to a particular vehicle model for which we are a significant supplier could reduce our sales and harm our business A number of our customer contracts generally require us to supply a customer’s annual requirements for a particular vehicle model and assembly facilities, rather than for manufacturing a specific quantity of products. Such contracts range from one year to the life of the model, which is generally four to seven years. These contracts are often subject to renegotiation, sometimes as frequently as annually, which may affect product pricing, and generally may be terminated by our customers at any time. Therefore, the discontinuation of, the loss of business with respect to, or a lack of commercial success of a particular vehicle model or brand for which we are a significant supplier could reduce our sales and harm our business prospects, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition. We are working to expand our product offerings beyond light passenger vehicles to include other mobility safety solutions. If we are not successful in expanding our product offerings or if it takes longer or costs are more than expected, it could harm our business The Company is working to expand its product offerings to focus on mobility safety solutions. Because mobility safety product offerings are currently in the development stages, it is difficult for us to anticipate the level of sales they may generate. The expansion of our product offering will require us to invest time and resources to develop innovative products, such as wearables and helmets, that keep pace with continuing changes in industry standards and to reach new customers who have rapidly changing preferences. Our product offerings might not receive customer acceptance if customer preferences shift to other products, and our future success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and respond to these changes. If we are not successful in expanding our product offerings or if it takes longer or costs are more than expected, it could negatively impact our financial results, competitive position, and future business prospects. RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS We may incur material losses and costs as a result of product liability, warranty, and recall claims that may be brought against us or our customers We face risks related to product liability claims, warranty claims, and recalls in the event that any of our products actually or allegedly are defective, fail to perform as expected, or the use of our products results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. We may not be able to anticipate all of the possible performance or reliability problems that could arise with our products after they are released to the market. Additionally, increasing regulation and reporting requirements regarding potentially defective products, particularly in the U.S., may increase the possibility that we become involved in additional product liability or recall investigations or claims. See – “Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market”. Although we currently carry product liability and product recall insurance in excess of our self-insured amounts, no assurance can be made that such insurance will provide adequate coverage against potential claims, such insurance is available or will continue to be available in the appropriate markets, or that we will be able to obtain such insurance on acceptable terms in the future. The cost of such insurance has risen in recent years and our self-insured amounts have risen as well. Although we have invested and will continue to invest in our engineering, design, and quality infrastructure, we cannot give any assurance that our products will not suffer from defects or other deficiencies or that we will not experience material warranty claims or product recalls. In the future, we could experience material warranty or product liability losses and incur significant costs to process and defend these claims. A successful claim brought against us in excess of available insurance coverage, if any, or a requirement to participate in any product recall, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, cash flows, or financial condition. Future recalls could result in costs not covered by insurance in excess of our self-insurance, further government inquiries, litigation, reputational harm, and could divert management’s attention away from other matters. The main variables affecting the costs of a recall are the number of vehicles ultimately determined to be affected by the issue, the cost per vehicle associated with a recall, the determination of proportionate responsibility among the customer, the Company, and any relevant sub-suppliers, and actual insurance recoveries. Every vehicle manufacturer has its own practices regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers, and the performance and remedial requirements vary between jurisdictions. Due to recall activity in the automotive industry over the past decade, some vehicle manufactures have become even more sensitive to product recall risks. As suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process and assume more of the vehicle assembly functions, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly looking to their suppliers for contribution when faced with recalls and product liability claims. Product recalls in our industry, even when they do not involve our products, can harm the reputations of our customers, competitors, and us, particularly if those recalls cause consumers to question the safety or reliability of products similar to those we produce. In addition, with global platforms and procedures, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly evaluating our quality performance on a global basis; any one or more quality, warranty or other recall issue(s) (including issues affecting few units and/or having a small financial impact) may cause a vehicle manufacturer to implement measures which may have a severe impact on our operations, such as a global, temporary or prolonged suspension of new orders. In addition, as our products more frequently use 11 global designs and are based on or utilize the same or similar parts, components or solutions, there is a risk that the number of vehicles affected globally by a failure or defect will increase significantly with a corresponding increase in our costs. A warranty, recall or product liability claim brought against us in excess of our available insurance may have a material adverse effect on our business. Vehicle manufacturers are also increasingly requiring their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and bear the costs of repair and replacement of such products under new vehicle warranties. A vehicle manufacturer may attempt to hold us responsible for some or the entire repair or replacement costs of defective products under new vehicle warranties when the product supplied did not perform as represented. Accordingly, the future costs of warranty claims by our customers may be material. However, the final amounts determined to be due related to these matters could differ materially from our recorded warranty estimates and our business prospects, operating results, cash flows or financial condition may be materially impacted as a result. In addition, as we adopt new technology, we face an inherent risk of exposure to the claims of others that we have allegedly violated their intellectual property rights. We cannot assure that we will not experience any material warranty, product liability or intellectual property claim losses in the future or that we will not incur significant costs to defend such claims. See “If our patents are declared invalid or our technology infringes on the proprietary rights of others, our ability to compete may be impaired”. Escalating pricing pressures from our customers may adversely affect our business The automotive industry continues to experience aggressive pricing pressure from customers. This trend is partly attributable to the major automobile manufacturers’ strong purchasing power. As with other automotive component manufacturers, we are often expected to quote fixed prices or are forced to accept prices with annual price reduction commitments for long-term sales arrangements or discounted reimbursements for engineering work. Price reductions have impacted our sales and profit margins and are expected to continue to do so in the future. Our future profitability will depend upon, among other things, our ability to continuously reduce our cost per unit and maintain our cost structure, enabling us to remain cost-competitive. Our profitability is also influenced by our success in designing and marketing technological improvements in automotive safety systems, which helps us offset price reductions by our customers. If we are unable to offset continued price reductions through improved operating efficiencies and reduced expenditures, these price reductions may have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, operating results, cash flows or financial condition. We could experience disruption in our supply or delivery chain, which could cause one or more of our customers to halt or delay production We, as with other component manufactures in the automotive industry, ship our products to customer vehicle assembly facilities throughout the world on a “just-in-time” basis for our customers to maintain low inventory levels. Our suppliers (external suppliers as well as our own production sites) use a similar method in providing raw materials to us. However, this “just-in-time” method makes the logistics supply chain in our industry very complex and vulnerable to disruption. Disruptions in our supply chain may result for many reasons, including closures of one of our own or one of our suppliers’ facilities or critical manufacturing lines due to strikes or other labor disputes, mechanical failures, electrical outages, fires, explosions, critical pollution levels, critical health and safety and other working conditions issues (including epidemics and pandemics), natural disasters, war, political upheaval, as well as logistical complications due to labor disruptions, weather or natural disasters, acts of terrorism or violence (such as the conflict in the Red Sea), mechanical failures, and legislation or regulation regarding the transport of hazardous goods. Additionally, we may experience disruptions if there are newly imposed trade restrictions or delays in customs processing, including if we are unable to obtain government authorization to export or import certain materials, including materials that may be viewed as dangerous such as the propellant used for our inflators. As we continue to expand in growth markets, the risk of such disruptions is heightened. The unavailability of even a single small subcomponent necessary to manufacture one of our products, for whatever reason, could force us to cease production of that product, possibly for a prolonged period. Similarly, a potential quality issue could force us to halt deliveries while we validate the products. Even when products are ready to be shipped, or have been shipped, delays may arise before they reach our customer. Also, similar difficulties for other suppliers may force our customers to halt production, which may in turn impact our sales shipments to such customers. When we fail to timely deliver, we may have to absorb our own costs for identifying and resolving the ultimate problem as well as expeditiously producing and shipping replacement components or products. Generally, we must also carry the costs associated with “catching up,” such as overtime and premium freight. If we are the cause of a customer being forced to halt production, the customer may seek to recoup all of its losses and expenses from us. These losses and expenses could be very significant and may include consequential losses such as lost profits. Where a customer halts production because of another supplier failing to deliver on time, we may not be fully compensated, if at all. Thus, any such supply chain disruptions could severely impact our operations and/or those of our customers and force us to halt production for prolonged periods of time which could expose us to material claims for compensation and have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, operating results, or financial condition. Adverse developments affecting our suppliers could harm our profitability Any significant disruption in our supplier relationships, particularly relationships with single-source suppliers, could harm our profitability. Furthermore, some of our suppliers may not be able to sufficiently manage the currency commodity cost volatility and/or sharply changing volumes while still performing as we expect. For example, recalls or field actions from our customers can stress the capacity of our supply chain and may inhibit our ability to timely deliver order volumes. We may incur costs as we try to make contingency plans to manage the risks for delivery delays, production delays, production issues or delivery of non-conforming products by our suppliers. Changes in the source, cost, availability of and regulations pertaining to raw materials and components may adversely affect our profit margins Our business uses a broad range of raw materials and components in the manufacture of our products, nearly all of which are generally available from a number of qualified suppliers. Our industry may be affected from time to time by limited supplies or price fluctuations of certain key components and materials. Strong worldwide demand for certain raw materials has had a significant impact on prices and short-term availability in recent years. Such price increases have and could materially increase our operating costs and materially and adversely affect our profit margin, as direct material costs amounted to approximately 55% of our net sales in 2023, of which approximately half is the raw material cost portion. Inflation is currently high world-wide and may continue for some time. Commercial negotiations with our customers and suppliers may not always offset all of the adverse impact of higher raw material, energy, labor, logistics, and commodity costs. Even where we are able to pass price increases along to our customer, there may be (i) a lapse of time before we are able to do 12 so such that we must absorb the cost increase, and (ii) a negative impact on our relationships with such customers and suppliers which may limit our success in securing future awards from customers and securing acceptable supplies from suppliers. In addition, no assurances can be given that the magnitude and duration of such cost increases or any future cost increases could not have a larger adverse impact on our profitability and consolidated financial position than currently anticipated. Furthermore, if costs for raw materials go down, the price for our products may decrease as well as the price is indexed to the cost of raw materials. Additionally, various government regulators require companies that manufacture products containing certain minerals and their derivatives that are known as “conflict minerals”, originating from the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries to perform due diligence and report the source of such materials. There are significant resources associated with complying with these requirements, including diligence efforts to determine the sources of conflict minerals used in our products and potential changes to our processes or supplies as a consequence of such diligence efforts. As there may be only a limited number of suppliers able to offer certified “conflict free” conflict minerals, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain necessary conflict free minerals from such suppliers in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. We may face reputational challenges if we determine that certain of our products contain minerals not determined to be conflict free or if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all minerals used in our products through the procedures we may implement. Furthermore, our customers are also increasingly requiring us to track sustainable sources of certain raw materials, which also requires additional diligence efforts and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain these materials in a cost-efficient and sustainable manner. Accordingly, these rules and customer requirements may adversely affect our business prospects, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition. Our business could be materially and adversely affected if we lost any of our largest customers or if they were unable to pay their invoices We are dependent on a few large customers with strong purchasing power. This is the result of customer consolidation in the last few decades. In 2023, our top five customers represented around 48% of our consolidated sales, and our largest customer contract accounted for around 2.8% of our consolidated sales. Although business with any given customer is typically split into several contracts (either on the basis of one contract per vehicle model or on a broader platform basis), the loss of business from any of our major customers (whether by lower overall demand for vehicles, cancellation of existing contracts or the failure to award us new business) could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Similarly, further consolidation of our customers in the future could make us more reliant upon a smaller group of customers for a significant portion of our consolidated sales and negatively impact our bargaining power when contracting with such customers. Customers may put us on a “new business hold,” which would limit our ability to quote or be awarded all or part of their future vehicle contracts if quality or other issues arise in the vehicles for which we were a supplier. This could have a significant negative impact on our order intake. Such new business holds range in length and scope and are generally accompanied by a certain set of remedial conditions that must be met before we are eligible to bid for new business. Meeting any such conditions within the prescribed timeframe may require additional Company resources. A failure to satisfy any such conditions may have a material adverse impact on our financial results in the long term. There is a risk that one or more of our major customers may be unable to pay our invoices as they become due or that a customer will simply refuse to make such payments given its financial difficulties. If a major customer would enter into bankruptcy proceedings or similar proceedings whereby contractual commitments are subject to stay of execution and the possibility of legal or other modification, or if a major customer otherwise successfully procures protection against us legally enforcing its obligations, it is likely, absent special relief such as having a “preferred status”, that we will be forced to record a substantial loss. Additional information concerning our major customers is included in Note 19, Segment Information, of the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. Our inability to effectively manage the timing, quality and costs of new program launches could adversely affect our financial performance To compete effectively in the automotive supply industry, we must be able to launch new products to meet our customers’ timing, performance, and quality standards. At times, we face an uneven number of launches and some launches, for various reasons, may have shortened launch lead times. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to install and certify the equipment needed to produce products for new programs in time for the start of production, or that the transitioning of our manufacturing facilities and resources to full production for such new programs will not impact production rates or other operational efficiency measures at our facilities. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that our customers will execute on schedule the launch of their new product programs, for which we might supply products. Additionally, as a Tier 1 supplier, we must effectively coordinate the activities of numerous suppliers in order to launch programs successfully. Given the complexity of new program launches, especially involving new and innovative technologies, we may experience difficulties managing product quality, timeliness and associated costs. In addition, new program launches require a significant ramp up of costs; however, the sales related to these new programs generally are dependent upon the timing and success of the introduction of new vehicles by the Company’s customers. Our inability to effectively manage the timing, quality and costs of these new program launches could adversely affect our business prospects, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition. Changes in our product mix may impact our financial performance We sell products that have varying profit margins. Our financial performance can be impacted depending on the mix of products we sell during a given period. Our earnings guidance, estimates, and financial targets assume a certain geographic sales mix as well as a product sales mix. If actual results vary significantly from this projected geographic and product mix of sales, our operating results and financial condition could be negatively impacted. We are involved from time to time in legal proceedings and our business may suffer as a result of adverse outcomes of current or future legal proceedings We are, from time to time, involved in litigation, regulatory proceedings, and commercial or contractual disputes that may be significant. These matters may include, without limitation, disputes with our suppliers and customers, intellectual property claims, shareholder litigation, government investigations, class action lawsuits, personal injury claims, product liability claims, environmental issues, antitrust, 13 customs and VAT disputes, and employment and tax issues. In such matters, government agencies or private parties may seek to recover from us very large, indeterminate amounts in penalties or monetary damages (including, in some cases, treble or punitive damages) or seek to limit our operations in some way. The possibility exists that claims may be asserted against us and their magnitude may remain unknown for long periods of time. These types of lawsuits could require a significant amount of management’s time and attention and a substantial legal liability or adverse regulatory outcome and the substantial expenses to defend the litigation or regulatory proceedings may have a material adverse effect on our customer relationships, business prospects, reputation, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition. No assurances can be given that such proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse impact on our profitability and consolidated financial position or that our established reserves or our available insurance will mitigate such impact. We may be subject to civil antitrust litigation that could negatively impact our business The Company may be subject to civil antitrust lawsuits in the future in countries that permit such civil claims, including lawsuits or other actions by our customers. The Company was previously the subject of an investigation by the European Commission (“EC”) regarding possible anti-competitive behavior among certain suppliers to the automotive vehicle industry. The Company paid a fine to resolve these matters in 2019. As a result of the outcome of the EC investigation, we are and we could be, subject to subsequent civil disputes with non-governmental third parties and civil or stockholder litigation stemming from the same facts and circumstances underlying the EC investigation. These types of lawsuits require significant management time and attention and could result in significant expenses as well as unfavorable outcomes that could have a material adverse impact on our customer relationships, business prospects, reputation, operating results, cash flows or financial condition, and our insurance may not mitigate such impact. See Note 17, Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. Work stoppages, slow-downs or other labor issues at our customers’ facilities or at our facilities could adversely affect our operations Because the automotive industry relies heavily on “just-in-time” delivery of components during the assembly and manufacture of vehicles, a work stoppage or slow-down at one or more of the Company’s facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business. Similarly, if any of our customers were to experience a work stoppage or slow-down, that customer may halt or limit the purchase of our products. Similarly, a work stoppage or slow-down at another supplier could interrupt production at one of our customers’ facilities which would have the same effect. While labor contract negotiations at our facilities historically have rarely resulted in work stoppages, no assurances can be given that we will be able to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions or that our failure to do so will not result in work stoppages. A work stoppage or other labor disruption at one or more of our facilities or our customers’ facilities could cause us to shut down production facilities supplying these products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Our ability to operate our company effectively could be impaired if we fail to attract and retain executive officers and other key personnel Our ability to operate our business and implement our strategies effectively depends, in part, on the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees. In addition, our future success will depend on, among other factors, our ability to attract, develop, and retain other qualified personnel, particularly engineers and other employees with software and technical expertise. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees or the failure to attract, develop, or retain other qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business. Restructuring, efficiency, and strategic initiatives and capacity alignments are complex and difficult and at any time additional restructuring steps may be necessary, possibly on short notice and at significant cost Our restructuring, efficiency, and strategic initiatives and capacity alignments include efforts to adjust our manufacturing capacity, direct and indirect labor workforce, and cost structure to meet current and projected operational and market requirements, including plant closures, transfer of sourcing to best cost countries, consolidation of our supplier base, and standardization of products to reduce our overhead costs and consolidate our operational centers. The successful implementation of our restructuring activities and capacity alignments will involve sourcing, logistics, technology, and employment arrangements. Because these restructuring, efficiency, and strategic initiatives and capacity alignments can be complex, there may be difficulties or delays in the implementation of any such initiatives and capacity alignments or they may not be immediately effective, resulting in an adverse material impact on our performance. In addition, there is a risk that inflation, high-turnover rates, and increased competition may reduce the efficiencies now available in best- cost countries to levels that no longer allow for cost-beneficial restructuring opportunities. Therefore, there can be no assurances that any future restructurings or capacity alignments will be completed as planned or achieve the desired results. See Note 11, Restructuring, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. A prolonged recession and/or a downturn in our industry could result in us having insufficient funds to continue our operations and external financing may not be available to us or available only on materially different terms than what has historically been available Our ability to generate cash from our operations is highly dependent on automotive sales and LVP, the global economy, and the economies of our important markets. If LVP were to remain on low levels for an extended period of time, we would experience a significantly negative cash flow. Similarly, if cash losses for customer defaults rise sharply, we would experience a negative cash flow. Such negative cash flow could result in our having insufficient funds to continue our operations unless we can procure external financing, which may not be possible. Our access to debt, securitization, or derivative markets around the world at competitive rates or in sufficient amounts could be affected by credit rating downgrades, market volatility, market disruption, regulatory requirements, or other factors. Our ability to obtain unsecured funding at a reasonable cost is dependent on our credit ratings or our perceived creditworthiness. Our current 14 credit rating could be lowered as a result of us experiencing significant negative cash flows, increasing our indebtedness and leverage, or a dire financial outlook, which may affect our ability to procure financing. We may also for the same, or other reasons, find it difficult to secure new long-term credit facilities, at reasonable terms, when our principal credit facility expires in 2027. Further, even our existing unutilized credit facilities may not be available to us as agreed, or only at additional cost, if participating banks are unable to raise the necessary funds, where, for instance, financial markets are not functioning as expected or one or more banks in our principal credit facility syndicate were to default. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will continue to have sufficient liquidity to meet our operating needs. In the event that we do not have sufficient external financing, we may be required to seek additional capital, sell assets, reduce or cut back our operating activities or otherwise alter our business strategy. Information concerning our credit facilities and other financings are included in Item 7 in this Annual Report in the section headed “Treasury Activities” and in Note 13, Debt and Credit Agreements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. Our indebtedness may harm our financial condition and results of operations As of December 31, 2023, we have outstanding debt of $1.9 billion. We may incur additional debt for a variety of reasons. Although our significant credit facilities and debt agreements do not have any financial covenants, our level of indebtedness will have several important effects on our future operations, including, without limitation: a portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to the payment of any interest or could be used for amortization required with respect to outstanding indebtedness; increases in our outstanding indebtedness and leverage will increase our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions, as well as to competitive pressure; depending on the levels of our outstanding debt, our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures, general corporate and other purposes may be limited; and potential future tightening of the availability of capital both from financial institutions and the debt markets may have an adverse effect on our ability to access additional capital. Governmental restrictions may impact our business adversely Some of our customers are (or may be) owned by a governmental entity, receive various forms of governmental aid or support or are subject to governmental influence in other forms, which may impact us as a supplier to these customers. As a result, they may be required to partner with local entities or procure components from local suppliers to achieve a specific local content or be subject to other restrictions regarding localized content or ownership. The nature and form of any such restrictions or protections, whatever their basis, is very difficult to predict as is their potential impact. However, they are likely to be based on political rather than economical or operational considerations and may materially impact our business. Impairment charges relating to our assets, goodwill and other intangible assets could adversely affect our financial performance We periodically review the carrying value of our assets, goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment indicators. If one or more of our customers’ facilities cease production or decrease their production volumes, the assets we carry related to our facilities serving such customers may decrease in value because we may no longer be able to utilize or realize them as intended. Where such decreases are significant, such impairments may have a material adverse impact on our financial results. We monitor the various factors that impact the valuation of our goodwill and other intangible assets, including expected future cash flow levels, global economic conditions, market price for our stock, and trends with our customers. Impairment of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets may result from, among other things, deterioration in our performance and especially the cash flow performance of these goodwill assets, adverse market conditions and adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations. If there are changes in these circumstances or the other variables associated with the estimates, judgments and assumptions relating to the valuation of goodwill, when assessing the valuation of our goodwill items, we may determine that it is appropriate to write down a portion of our goodwill or intangible assets and record related non-cash impairment charges. In the event that we determine that we are required to write-down a portion of our goodwill items and other intangible assets and thereby record related non-cash impairment charges, our financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected. For additional information, see Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates – Goodwill and Intangibles”. We face risks related to our defined benefit pension plans and employee benefit plans, including the need for additional funding as well as higher costs and liabilities Our defined benefit pension plans and employee benefit plans may require additional funding or give rise to higher related costs and liabilities which, in some circumstances, could reach material amounts and negatively affect our operating results. We are required to make certain year-end assumptions regarding our pension plans. Our pension obligations are dependent on several factors, including factors outside our control such as changes in interest rates, the market performance of the diversified investments underlying the pension plans, actuarial data and adjustments and an increase in the minimum funding requirements or other regulatory changes governing the plans. Adverse equity market conditions and volatility in the credit market may have an unfavorable impact on the value of our pension assets and our future estimated pension liabilities. Internal factors such as an adjustment to the level of benefits provided under the plans may also lead to an increase in our pension liability. If these or other internal and external risks were to occur, alone or in combination, our required contributions to the plans and the costs and net liabilities associated with the plans could increase substantially and have a material effect on our business. Information concerning our benefit plans is included in Note 18, Retirement Plans, of the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. We may not be able to, or we may decide not to, pay dividends or repurchase shares at a level anticipated by our shareholders, which could reduce shareholder returns The extent to which we pay dividends on our common stock and repurchase our common stock in the future is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and depends upon a number of factors, including our earnings, financial condition, cash and capital needs, indebtedness and leverage, and general economic or business conditions. No assurance can be given that we will be able to or will choose to pay any dividends or repurchase any shares in the foreseeable future. 15 Cybersecurity incidents or other damage to our technology infrastructure could disrupt business operations, result in the loss of critical and confidential information, and adversely impact our reputation and operating results We rely extensively on information technology (“IT”) networks and systems, our global data centers and services provided over the internet to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes or activities across our facilities worldwide. In addition, a greater number of our employees are working remotely which may increase cybersecurity vulnerabilities and risk to our IT networks and systems. The secure operation of our IT networks and systems and the proper processing and maintenance of this information are critical to our business operations. We have been, and likely will continue to be, subject to cyber- attacks. Although we seek to deploy comprehensive security measures to prevent, detect, address and mitigate these threats, there has been an increased level of activity, and an associated level of sophistication, in cyber-attacks against large multinational companies. The ever-evolving threats mean we and our third-party service providers and vendors must continually evaluate and adapt our respective systems and processes and overall security environment, as well as those of any companies we acquire. There is no guarantee that these measures will be fully implemented, complied with, or effective in safeguarding against all data security breaches, system compromises or misuses of data. Our security measures may be breached due to human or technological error, employee malfeasance, system malfunctions or attacks from uncoordinated individuals or sophisticated and targeted measures known as advanced persistent threats, directed at the Company, its products, its customers, its third-party service providers, and/or other entities with whom we do business. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Disruptions and attacks on our IT systems or the systems of third parties storing our data or employee malfeasance or human or technological error could result in the misappropriation, loss, destruction or corruption of our critical data and confidential or proprietary information, personal information of our employees, the leakage of our or our customers’ confidential information, improper use of our systems and networks, production downtimes and both internal and external supply shortages, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. It may also result in the theft of intellectual property or other misappropriation of assets, or otherwise compromise our confidential or proprietary information and materially disrupt our operations. The potential consequences of a material cybersecurity incident include reputational damage, damaged customer relationships, loss of revenue, lower order intake in the future, theft of intellectual property, litigation with third parties, diminution in the value of our investment in research, development and engineering, diversion of the attention of management away from the operation of our business and increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs, legal claims and liability, regulatory scrutiny, sanctions, fines or penalties (which may not be covered by our insurance policies), negative publicity, release of sensitive and/or confidential information, increases in operating expenses, or lost revenues which in turn could adversely affect our competitiveness and results of operations. To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a misappropriation, loss, destruction or corruption of our customer’s information, it could affect our relationships with our customers, create significant expense for us to investigate and remediate damage, lead to claims against the Company and ultimately harm our business, strategy, result of operations, or financial condition. In addition, we may be required to incur significant costs to protect against damage caused by these disruptions or security breaches in the future. In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs. Furthermore, our technology systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural disasters, power loss and telecommunication failures. We continuously seek to maintain a robust program of information security and controls, however, any future significant compromise or breach of our data security, whether external or internal, or misuse of customer, associate, supplier or Company data, could result in significant costs, lost sales, fines, lawsuits, and damage to our reputation. Third parties that maintain certain of our confidential and proprietary information could experience a cybersecurity incident We rely on third parties to provide or maintain some of our IT systems, data centers and related services and do not exercise direct control over these systems. Despite the implementation of security measures at third party locations, these IT systems, data centers and cloud services are also vulnerable to security breaches or other disruptions. Additionally, we and certain of our third-party vendors, collect and store personal information in connection with human resources operations and other aspects of our business. While we obtain assurances that any third parties we provide data to will protect this information and, where we believe appropriate, monitor the protections employed by these third parties, there is a risk the confidentiality of data held by us or by third parties may be compromised and expose us to liability for such breach. Global climate change could negatively affect our business Increased public awareness and concern regarding global climate change will likely result in more regional and/or national requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, our shareholders and customers also expect us to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. There continues to be a lack of consistent climate legislation, which creates economic and regulatory uncertainty. Any future regulations aimed at mitigating climate change may negatively impact the prices of raw materials and energy as well as the demand for certain of our customer’s products which could in turn impact demand for our products and impact our results of operations. The costs of compliance and any changes to our operations mandated by new or amended laws, may be significant. We may also face unexpected delays in obtaining permits and approvals required by such laws in connection with our manufacturing facilities, which would hinder our operation of these facilities. Furthermore, any violations of these laws may result in substantial fines and penalties, remediation costs, third party damages, or a suspension or cessation of our operations. We also face physical and transition risks from climate change. The manifestations of climate change, such as extreme weather conditions or more frequent extreme weather events, including wildfires, flooding, water stress and extreme heat, could disrupt our operations, damage our facilities, disrupt our supply chain, including our customers or suppliers, impact the availability and cost of materials needed for manufacturing or increase insurance and other operating costs. As a result, severe weather or a natural disaster that results in a prolonged disruption to our operations, or the operations of our customers or suppliers, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, cash flows or financial condition. Our goals, targets and ambitions related to sustainability and emissions reduction, and our public statements and disclosures regarding them, expose us to numerous risks We have developed, and will continue to develop and set, goals, targets, ambitions and other objectives related to sustainability matters, including our net-zero emission targets both for ourselves and our supply chain. Some of these are based on our internal scenario analysis, which may not prove to be accurate and carries inherent uncertainties. Statements related to these goals, targets, ambitions 16 and objectives reflect our current plans and do not constitute a guarantee that they will be achieved. Our efforts to research, establish, accomplish, and accurately report on these goals, targets, and objectives expose us to numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal, and other risks. Additionally, greenhouse gas emissions, particular emissions that come from individuals and entities up and down the value chain (otherwise known as Scope 3 emissions), are very difficult to estimate and our estimates may be materially different than actual emissions. Additionally, accepted methodologies or regulatory requirements for estimating emissions, particularly Scope 3 emissions, continue to evolve. The manner in which we estimate and disclose Scope 3 emissions may differ from other companies and may be different than future regulatory requirements, and currently, we do not include downstream Scope 3 emissions in our targets and ambitions. If future governmental regulations require us to modify the basis of our Scope 3 emissions disclosure, our historically disclosed Scope 3 emissions may change materially. Our ability to achieve any stated goal, target, ambition or objective, including with respect to emissions reduction, is subject to numerous factors and conditions, some of which are outside of our control. For example, we have announced that we are collaborating with Polestar to develop a climate neutral car. Such an endeavor requires the innovation and collaboration with a number of partners and is subject to certain inherent risks, including the timetable in which it is achieved. We may also have to purchase carbon offsets in order to meet our targets and objectives, which may not be available or may no longer be considered acceptable to use to meet such targets. Our business may face increased scrutiny from investors and other stakeholders related to our sustainability activities, including the goals, targets, and objectives that we announce, and our methodologies and timelines for pursuing them. If our sustainability practices do not meet investor or other stakeholder expectations and standards, which continue to evolve, our reputation, our ability to attract or retain employees, and our attractiveness as an investment or business partner could be negatively affected. Similarly, our failure or perceived failure to pursue or fulfill our sustainability-focused goals, targets, ambitions and objectives, to comply with ethical, environmental, or other standards, regulations, or expectations, or to satisfy various reporting standards with respect to these matters, within the timelines we announce, or at all, could adversely affect our business or reputation, as well as expose us to government enforcement actions and private litigation. Our business is exposed to risks inherent in international operations RISKS RELATED TO INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS We currently conduct operations in various countries and jurisdictions, including locating certain of our manufacturing and distribution facilities internationally, which subjects us to the legal, political, regulatory and social requirements and economic conditions in these jurisdictions. Some of these countries are considered growth markets and emerging markets. International sales and operations, especially in growth markets, subject us to certain risks inherent in doing business abroad, including: exposure to local economic conditions; unexpected changes in laws, regulations, trade, or monetary or fiscal policy, including interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and changes in inflation rates; foreign tax consequences; inability to collect, or delays in collecting, value-added taxes and/or other receivables associated with remittances and other payments by subsidiaries; exposure to local political turmoil and challenging labor conditions; changes in general economic and political conditions in countries where we operate, particularly in emerging markets; expropriation and nationalization; enforcing legal agreements or collecting receivables through foreign legal systems; wage inflation; currency controls, including lack of liquidity in foreign currency due to governmental restrictions, trade protection policies and currency controls, which may create difficulty in repatriating profits or making other remittances; compliance with the requirements of an increasing body of applicable anti-bribery laws; reduced intellectual property protection in various markets; investment restrictions or requirements; and the imposition of product tariffs and the burden of complying with a wide variety of international and U.S. export laws. The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) continues its base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) project begun in 2015 with new proposals for a global minimum tax, further development of a coordinated set of rules for taxation and the allocation of taxing rights between jurisdictions. These proposals, if adopted by countries in which we operate, could result in changes to tax policies, including transfer pricing policies, that could ultimately impact our tax liabilities. On December 12, 2022, the European Union member states agreed to implement the OECD’s Pillar 2 global corporate minimum tax at a rate of 15% on companies with revenues of at least $790 million, which went into effect in 2024. The Pillar 2 rules are also in effect in the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and South Korea, among others. Similarly, the United States passed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which also imposes, among other things, a 15% corporate minimum tax for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022, on certain U.S. based companies that have average revenues over a three-year period of at least $1 billion. Other countries including Canada and Australia are also actively considering changes to their tax laws to adopt certain parts of the OECD’s proposals. The timing or impact of these proposals and recommendations is unclear at this point. Changes in tax laws or policies by the U.S. or foreign jurisdictions could result in a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings, and any such change could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, cash flows, operating results and financial condition. Our international operations also depend upon favorable trade relations between the countries where we manufacture and sell products and those foreign countries in which our customers and suppliers have operations. Changes in national policy, other governmental action related to tariffs or international trade agreements, changes in social, political regulatory, and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories and countries where the Company currently manufactures and sells products, and any resulting negative sentiments towards the Company as a result of such changes could depress economic activity and restrict our access to suppliers or customers and have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, operating results and financial condition. Increasing our manufacturing footprint in the growth markets and our business relationships with automotive manufacturers in these markets are particularly important elements of our strategy. As a result, our exposure to the risks described above may be greater in the future, and our exposure to risks associated with developing countries, such as the risk of political upheaval and reliability of local infrastructure, may increase. Our foreign operations may subject us to risks relating to laws governing international relations Due to our global operations, we are subject to many laws governing international relations (including, but not limited to, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other anti-bribery regulations in foreign jurisdictions where we do business), which prohibit improper payments to government officials and restrict where and how we can do business, what information or products we can supply to certain countries 17 and what information we can provide to authorities in governmental authorities. We also export components and products that are subject to certain trade-related U.S. laws, including the U.S. Export Administration Act and various economic sanctions programs administered by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. Although we have procedures and policies in place that should mitigate the risk of violating these laws, there is no guarantee that they will be sufficiently effective. If and when we acquire new businesses, we may not be able to ensure that the pre-existing controls and procedures meant to prevent violations of these laws were effective, and violations may occur if we are unable to timely implement corrective and effective controls and procedures when integrating newly acquired businesses. Any allegations of noncompliance with these laws could harm our reputation, divert management attention and result in significant expenses, and could therefore materially harm our business prospects, operating results and financial condition. Our business in Asia is subject to aggressive competition and is sensitive to economic, market, and political conditions We operate in the automotive supply market throughout Asia including the highly competitive markets in China, South Korea, and India. In each of these markets we face competition from both international and smaller domestic manufacturers. Due to the significance of the Asian markets for our profit and growth, we are exposed to risks in China, South Korea, and India. We anticipate that additional competitors, both international and domestic, may seek to enter the Chinese, South Korean, and/or Indian markets resulting in increased competition. Increased competition may result in lower sales volumes, price reductions, reduced margins and our inability to gain or hold market share. There have been periods of increased market volatility and moderation in the levels of economic growth in China, which resulted in periods of lower automotive production growth rates in China than those previously experienced. Our business in Asia is sensitive to economic and market conditions that drive automotive sales volumes in China, South Korea, and India and may be impacted if there are reductions in vehicle demand in those markets. There are also trade and political tensions between China and other countries in the western world. If we are unable to maintain our position in the Asian markets, the pace of growth slows, or vehicle sales in these markets decrease, our business prospects, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Our business in Europe is sensitive to economic and market conditions We operate in the automotive supply market throughout Europe and are increasingly subject to the risks arising from adverse changes in the European economy. A significant deterioration in economic conditions, increased volatility, further declines in the European credit, equity, and foreign currency markets or geopolitical disruptions, including the war in Ukraine, could have negative impacts on our business operations in Europe and may lead to delays in or cancellations of customer orders. We also face competition from both international and smaller domestic manufacturers who may seek to enter the European markets resulting in increased competition. Increased competition may result in lower sales volumes, price reductions, reduced margins, and our inability to gain or hold market share. Global integration may result in additional risks Because of our efforts to manage costs by integrating our operations globally, we face the additional risk that, should any of the other risks discussed herein materialize, the negative effects could be more pronounced. For example, while supply delays of a component have typically only affected a few customer vehicle models, such a delay could now affect several vehicle models of several customers in several geographic areas. Similarly, any recall or warranty issue we face due to a product defect or failure is now more likely to involve a larger number of units in several geographic areas. Our business faces exchange rate risks As a result of our global presence, a significant portion of our revenues and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We are therefore subject to foreign currency risks and foreign exchange exposure. Such risks and exposures include: transaction exposure, which arises because the cost of a product originates in one currency and the product is sold in another currency; revaluation effects, which arise from valuation of assets denominated in other currencies than the reporting currency of each unit; translation exposure in the income statement, which arises when the income statements of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars; translation exposure in the balance sheet, which arises when the balance sheets of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars; and changes in the reported U.S. dollar amounts of cash flows. We cannot predict exchange rate volatility or the extent of its impact on our future financial results. We typically denominate foreign transactions in foreign currencies to achieve a natural hedge. However, a natural hedge cannot be achieved for all our currency flows; therefore, a net transaction exposure remains within the group. The net exposure can be significant and creates a transaction exposure risk for the Company. The Company does not hedge translation exposure. However, we do engage in foreign exchange rate hedging from time to time related to foreign currency transactions. For additional information, see Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk - Currency risks. RISKS RELATED TO ACQUISITIONS We face risks in connection with acquisitions, joint ventures, partnerships, and other strategic transactions Our growth has been enhanced through strategic transactions, including acquisitions of businesses, products and technologies, partnerships, strategic alliances, and joint development agreements that we believe will complement our business. We regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities, frequently engage in acquisition discussions, conduct due diligence activities in connection with possible acquisitions, and, where appropriate, engage in acquisition negotiations. We may not be able to successfully identify suitable acquisition and joint venture candidates or complete transactions on acceptable terms, integrate acquired operations into our existing operations or expand into new markets. Our failure to identify suitable strategic transactions may restrict our ability to grow our business. These strategic transactions also involve numerous additional risks to us and our investors, including: risks related to retaining acquired management and employees; difficulties in integrating acquired technologies, products, operations, services and personnel with our existing businesses; diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns; assumption of contingent liabilities; potential adverse financial impacts, including from the amortization of expenses related to intangible assets and from potential impairment of goodwill; incurrence of indebtedness; and potential damage to existing customer relationships or lack of customer acceptance or inability to attract new customers as a result of these transactions. In the future, we may pursue acquisitions of businesses or products that are 18 complementary to our business but for which we have historically had little or no direct experience. These transactions can involve significant challenges and risks as well as significant time and resources that may divert management’s attention from other business activities. If we fail to adequately manage these risks, the acquisitions and other strategic transactions may not result in revenue growth, operational synergies or service or technology enhancements, which could adversely affect our financial condition. RISKS RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY If our patents are declared invalid or our technology infringes on the proprietary rights of others, our ability to compete may be impaired We have developed a considerable amount of proprietary technology related to automotive safety systems and rely on a number of patents to protect such technology. Our intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining our competitive position in a number of the markets we serve. At present, we hold more than 6,500 patents and patent applications covering a large number of innovations and product ideas, mainly in the fields of seatbelt and airbag technologies. In addition to our in-house research and development efforts, we seek to acquire rights to new intellectual property through corporate acquisitions, asset acquisitions, licensing and joint venture arrangements. Our patents and licenses expire on various dates during the period from 2024 to 2043. We do not expect the expiration of any single patent or license to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Developments or assertions by or against us relating to intellectual property rights could negatively impact our business. We primarily protect our innovations with patents and vigorously protect and defend our patents, trademarks and know-how against infringement and unauthorized use. If we are not able to protect our intellectual property and our proprietary rights and technology, we could lose those rights and incur substantial costs policing and defending those rights. We also generate license revenue from these patents, which we may lose if we do not adequately protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights. Our means of protecting our intellectual property, proprietary rights and technology may not be adequate, and our competitors may independently develop technologies that are similar or superior to our proprietary technologies, duplicate our technologies, or design around the patents we own or license. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as the laws of the U.S. and we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. This could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or misappropriation of our other intellectual property rights. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate. We may not be able to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights, which could result in the loss of our rights or increased costs Although we believe that our products and technology do not infringe the proprietary rights of others, third parties may assert infringement claims against us in the future. Additionally, we license proprietary technology, from third parties, that is covered by patents, and we cannot be certain that any such patents will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented. Such licenses may also be non-exclusive, meaning our competition may also be able to access such technology. Further, we expect to continue to expand our products and services and expand into new businesses, including through developing new products, acquisitions, joint ventures and joint development agreements, which could increase our exposure to patent and other intellectual property claims from competitors and other parties. If claims alleging patent, copyright or trademark infringement are brought against us and are successfully prosecuted against us, they could result in substantial costs. If a successful claim is made against us and we fail to develop non-infringing technology, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, certain of our products utilize components that are developed by third parties and licensed to us. If claims alleging patent, copyright or trademark infringement are brought against such licensors and successfully prosecuted, they could result in substantial costs, and we may not be able to replace the functions provided by these licensors. Alternate sources for the technology currently licensed to us may not be available in a timely manner, may not provide the same functions as currently provided or may be more expensive than products currently used. We may develop proprietary information through our in-house research and development efforts, consulting arrangements or research collaborations with other entities or organizations. We may seek to protect this proprietary information by entering into confidentiality agreements or consulting, services or employment agreements that contain non-disclosure and non-use provisions with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and other third parties. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breached or may otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation of our proprietary information. We may not be able to respond quickly enough to changes in technology and technological risks and to develop our intellectual property into commercially viable products Changes in legislative, regulatory, or industry requirements or in competitive technologies may render certain of our products obsolete or less attractive to our customers. We currently license certain proprietary technology to third parties and, if such technology becomes obsolete or less attractive, those licensees could terminate our license agreements, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Our ability to anticipate changes in technology and regulatory standards and to successfully develop and introduce new and enhanced products on a timely basis will be a significant factor in our ability to remain competitive. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to achieve the technological advances that may be necessary for us to remain competitive or that certain of our products will not become obsolete. We are also subject to the risks generally associated with new product introductions and applications, including lack of market acceptance, delays in product development and failure of products to operate properly. As part of our business strategy, we may from time to time seek to acquire businesses or assets that provide us with additional intellectual property. We may experience problems integrating acquired technologies into our existing technologies and products, and such acquired intellectual property may be subject to known or contingent liabilities such as infringement claims. 19 Some of our products and technologies may use “open source” software, which may restrict how we use or distribute our products or require that we release the source code of certain products subject to those licenses Some of our products and technologies may incorporate software licensed under so-called “open source” licenses. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on origin of the software. Additionally, open source licenses typically require that source code subject to the license be made available to the public and that any modifications or derivative works to open source software continue to be licensed under open source licenses. These open source licenses typically mandate that proprietary software, when combined in specific ways with open source software, become subject to the open source license. If we combine our proprietary software in such ways with open source software, we could be required to release the source code of our proprietary software. We take steps to ensure that our proprietary software is not combined with, and does not incorporate, open source software in ways that would require our proprietary software to be subject to an open source license. However, few courts have interpreted open source licenses; therefore, the way these licenses may be interpreted and enforced is subject to some uncertainty. RISKS RELATED TO GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS AND TAXES Our business may be adversely affected by laws or regulations, including environmental, occupational health and safety, and other governmental regulations We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations, including those related to the requirements of environmental, occupational health and safety, financial, and other matters. We cannot predict the substance or impact of pending or future legislation or regulations, or the application thereof. The introduction of new laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations, or the interpretations thereof, could increase the costs of doing business for us or our customers or suppliers or restrict our actions and adversely affect our business prospects, operating results, cash flows or financial condition. Our operations are subject to environmental and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things, emissions to air, discharges to waters and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste and other materials. The operation of automotive parts manufacturing facilities entails risks in these areas, and we cannot assure that we will not incur material costs or liabilities as a result. Additionally, environmental laws, regulations, and permits and the enforcement thereof change frequently and have tended to become increasingly stringent over time, which may necessitate substantial capital expenditures or operating costs or may require changes of production processes. Although we have no known pending material environmental issues, there is no assurance that we will not be adversely impacted by any environmental costs, liabilities, or claims in the future either under present laws and regulations or those that may be adopted or imposed in the future. Our costs, liabilities, and obligations relating to environmental matters may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition. Our facilities in the U.S. are subject to regulation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), which regulates the protection of the health and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard requires that we maintain information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that we provide this information to employees, state and local governmental authorities and residents. We are also subject to occupational safety regulations in other countries. Our failure to comply with government occupational safety regulations, including OSHA requirements, or general industry standards relating to employee health and safety, keep adequate records or monitor occupational exposure to regulated substances could expose us to liability, enforcement, and fines and penalties, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition. Although we employ safety procedures in the design and operation of our facilities, there is a risk that an accident or injury to one of our employees could occur in one of our facilities. Any accident or injury to our employees could result in litigation, manufacturing delays and harm to our reputation, which could negatively affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. 20 Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market Government vehicle safety regulations are a key driver in our business. Historically, these regulations have imposed ever more stringent safety regulations for vehicles. Safety regulations have a positive impact on driver awareness and acceptance of automotive safety products and technology. These more stringent safety regulations often require vehicles to have more safety content per vehicle and more advanced safety products, which has thus been a driver of growth in our business. However, these regulations are subject to change based on a number of factors that are not within our control, including new scientific or medical data, adverse publicity regarding the industry recalls and safety risks of airbags or seatbelts (for instance, to children and small adults), domestic and foreign political developments or considerations, and litigation relating to our products and our competitors’ products. Changes in government regulations in response to these and other considerations could have a severe impact on our business. Although we believe that over time safety will continue to be a regulatory priority, if government priorities shift and we are unable to adapt to changing regulations, our business may suffer material adverse effects. The regulatory obligation of complying with safety regulations could increase as federal and local regulators impose more stringent compliance and reporting requirements in response to product recalls and safety issues in our industry. We are subject to existing stringent requirements under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (the “Vehicle Safety Act”), including a duty to report, subject to strict timing requirements, safety defects with our products. The Vehicle Safety Act imposes potentially significant civil penalties for violations including the failure to comply with such reporting actions. We are also subject to the existing U.S. Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation (TREAD) Act, which requires equipment manufacturers, such as Autoliv, to comply with “Early Warning” requirements by reporting certain information to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) such as: information related to defects or reports of injury related to our products. TREAD imposes criminal liability for violating such requirements if a defect subsequently causes death or bodily injury. In addition, the Vehicle Safety Act authorizes NHTSA to require a manufacturer to recall and repair vehicles that contain safety defects or fail to comply with U.S. federal motor vehicle safety standards. Sales into foreign countries may be subject to similar regulations. Due to the record recall of airbag inflators of one of our competitors, NHTSA has become more active in requesting information from suppliers and vehicle manufactures regarding potential product defects. Negative or unexpected tax developments could adversely affect our effective tax rate, operating results and financial condition Changes in, or changes in the application of, U.S. or foreign tax laws, regulations or accounting principles with respect to matters such as tax base, tax rates, transfer pricing, dividends and restrictions on certain forms of tax relief or limitations on favorable tax treatment could affect the calculation of our income taxes and other tax liabilities, our effective tax rate, and the carrying value of our deferred tax assets. Our annual tax rate is based on our income and the tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Because of our global operations we face uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. Significant judgment and estimation are required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions, in many cases where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of our tax liability may be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world and in a number of jurisdictions, we are currently under examination, which inherently creates uncertainty. Although we periodically assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes, negative or unexpected results from one or more of such reviews and audits, including any related interest or penalties imposed by governmental authorities, could increase our effective tax rate and adversely impact our operating results, cash flows or financial condition. The effective tax rates used for interim reporting are based on our projected full-year geographic earnings mix and take into account projected tax costs on intercompany dividends from lower tier subsidiaries. Changes in currency exchange rates, earnings mix among taxing jurisdictions, or the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends could impact our reported effective tax rates, or cause fluctuations in the tax rate from quarter to quarter. Certain anti-trust judgments or settlements may not be tax deductible, which could have a material negative impact to our annual tax rate. A number of other factors may also increase our effective tax rate, which could have an adverse impact on our profitability and operating results. Due to our numerous foreign operations, our tax rate may be impacted by our global mix of earnings if our pre-tax income is lower than anticipated in countries with lower statutory tax rates and/or is higher than anticipated in countries with higher statutory tax rates. Based on U.S. regulatory rules, we do not record current or deferred tax liabilities on permanent investments in our foreign subsidiaries. See Note 5, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. We may not be able to fully realize our deferred tax assets We currently carry deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, resulting from deductible temporary differences and tax loss carry- forwards, both of which will reduce taxable income in the future. However, deferred tax assets may only be realized against taxable income. The amount of our deferred tax assets could be reduced, from time to time, due to adverse changes in our operations or in estimates of future taxable income from operations during the carry-forward period as a result of a deterioration in market conditions or other circumstances. Any such reduction would adversely affect our income in the period of the adjustment. Additional information on our deferred tax assets is included in Note 5, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Not applicable. 21 Item 1C. Cybersecurity Autoliv maintains a cybersecurity program designed to identify, assess, manage, mitigate, and respond to cybersecurity threats as an integrated part of the Company’s overall operations. The objective is to provide protection against cybersecurity threats to our employees, operations, data, and products. Cybersecurity risk management and strategy Cybersecurity risk management for the Company is undertaken both through dedicated cybersecurity risk management processes and within the Company’s overall Enterprise Risk Management program, which is overseen by the Audit and Risk Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. Autoliv has established an Enterprise Risk Management framework aligned to the ISO 31000:2019 to ensure that the context, principles, and processes for risk management are embedded and integrated with the operations of the company. All risks across the Autoliv risk universe, including cybersecurity, are assessed with bottom-up risk assessments and subsequently are aggregated and reported to the Audit and Risk Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. Autoliv utilizes the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) Cybersecurity Framework in combination with other corresponding and partially mandated frameworks to guide cybersecurity risk management. This approach includes the identification, assessment, response, and management of risks arising from cybersecurity threats that may result in material adverse effects on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our business, data and information systems. The Company contracts with third parties to assess Autoliv’s cybersecurity program relative to its peers, utilizing the NIST framework as a baseline. Furthermore, Autoliv is pursuing, under TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange), an assessment and exchange mechanism for information security in the automotive industry, as well as compliance with road vehicle cybersecurity requirements as applicable to the supply chain under ISO 21434. Frequent testing/auditing activities, bottom-up cybersecurity risk assessments, vulnerability scanning, monitoring of external threat intelligence and supplier risk sources, and 24/7 incident monitoring are executed by the cybersecurity function to inform our understanding of the cybersecurity risk landscape, including solutions from third-party service providers, and what areas of enhancement to prioritize. Further input is gained from regular maturity assessments executed by third parties as well as TISAX assessments executed by external audit bodies. Autoliv combines expertise from our internal cybersecurity function with additional specialist capacities from external consultants and partners as may be from time to time. Separately, because we understand the risks associated with engaging third party vendors, such as service providers, consultants and partners, in our cybersecurity risk management processes, we conduct security assessments pre- engagement and monitor their work to mitigate any identified risks. Autoliv has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant. Despite our efforts, there can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management processes and measures described will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our systems and information. We face risks from cybersecurity threats that, if realized, are reasonably likely to materially affect our business strategy, result of operations or financial condition. For a full discussion of these cybersecurity risks, please see our Risk Factors in Item 1A. Board and management governance Management's Role The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) is responsible for overseeing the Company’s cybersecurity practices. Our CISO joined Autoliv in 2015. He has 29 years of information technology experience, including six years as CISO. The CISO reports directly to the CFO but, in line with the corporate governance model, the CISO’s activities are formally governed through a management board, the “Digitalization and IT Management Board” (“DITM Board”) comprised of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and certain members of Autoliv’s Executive Management Team (“EMT”) representing engineering, supply chain management, operations and manufacturing, quality and project management, finance, information technology, and divisional teams. The DITM Board meets at least quarterly with cybersecurity as a standing agenda item. In addition to the standing DITM Board meetings, the CISO, when needs arise, meets with the full EMT typically at least semi-annually to report on, or discuss, specific cybersecurity-related topics. The Cybersecurity function in Autoliv reports to the CISO. The cybersecurity function includes team members in all of the Company’s divisions including technical security architects and incident response team members. The core team is supported by the broader organization with security coordinators in each plant and tech center and additional functional security experts as deemed relevant, such as in supply chain management and engineering. The function has the responsibility to operate day-to-day activities (e.g., testing, incident monitoring and response, vulnerability scanning and awareness training) as well as to drive prioritized improvements (as identified through the risk management processes), together with other relevant Autoliv functions and stakeholders. The security operations center (“SOC”), part of the Cybersecurity function, monitors Autoliv for cyber incidents 24/7. A documented incident response process and numerous documented playbooks provide the SOC guidance on how to respond for each type of incident, including categorization and principles 22 for escalation. Incidents are escalated in the organization according to defined criteria to engage a level of authority that is deemed appropriate, such as the Corporate Crisis Management Team if necessary. Board of Directors Oversight Our Board, in coordination with the Audit and Risk Committee, oversees the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management process, including the management of risks arising from cybersecurity threats. Our Board has delegated the primary responsibility to oversee cybersecurity matters to the Audit and Risk Committee. Both the Board and the Audit and Risk Committee periodically review the measures we have implemented to identify and mitigate cybersecurity risks. The Audit and Risk Committee receives information from the CISO and other members of management on at least a quarterly basis which is supplemented by a more extensive briefing from the CISO and management on at least a semi-annual basis on cybersecurity matters, including updates on cybersecurity training programs and the results of external assessments, as applicable. The CISO provides at least an annual briefing to the Board of Directors on these same topics. The routine reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee and the Board includes as appropriate the highlights from the full spectrum of work done within the Company’s cybersecurity program. The briefings by the CISO to the Audit and Risk Committee and Board also include the review of certifications and cybersecurity maturity assessments by management and third parties. 23 Item 2. Properties Autoliv’s principal executive offices are located at Klarabergsviadukten 70, Section B7, SE-111 64, Stockholm, Sweden. Autoliv’s various businesses operate in a number of production facilities and offices. Autoliv believes that its properties are adequately maintained and suitable for their intended use and that the Company’s production facilities have adequate capacity for the Company’s current and foreseeable needs. All of Autoliv’s production facilities and offices are owned or leased by operating (either subsidiary or joint venture) companies. AUTOLIV MANUFACTURING FACILITIES Location of Facility Items produced at Facility Owned/Leased Country/Company Brazil Autoliv do Brasil Ltda. Canada Autoliv Canada, Inc. VOA Canada, Inc. China Autoliv (Baoding) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd Autoliv (Changchun) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd. Autoliv (China) Steering Wheel Co., Ltd. Autoliv (Guangzhou) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd. Autoliv (Nanjing) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd. Autoliv Shenda (Nanjing) Automotive Components Co., Ltd. Autoliv (Shanghai) Vehicle Safety Systems Co., Ltd. Autoliv Shenda (Tai Cang) Automotive Safety Systems Co., Ltd. Autoliv (Jiangsu) Automotive Safety Components Co., Ltd. Autoliv (China) Automotive Safety Systems Co., Ltd. Mei-An Autoliv Co., Ltd. Estonia AS Norma France Autoliv France SNC Autoliv Isodelta SAS Livbag SAS N.C.S. Pyrotechnie et Technologies SAS Hungary Autoliv Kft. India Autoliv India Private Ltd. Indonesia P.T. Autoliv Indonesia Japan Autoliv Japan Ltd. Taubaté Nova Goiana Seatbelts, airbags, steering wheels and seatbelt webbing Seatbelts and steering wheels Tilbury Collingwood Airbag cushions Seatbelt webbing Baoding Changchun Fengxian/Shanghai Guangzhou Nanjing Nanjing Shanghai Shanghai Airbags Airbags and seatbelts Steering wheels Airbags and seatbelts Seatbelts Seatbelt webbing Airbags Seatbelt webbing Jintan Nantong Taipei Propellant, Airbag initiators and Airbag inflators Airbag cushions Seatbelts and airbags Owned Leased Owned Owned Leased Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Leased Tallinn Seatbelts and belt components Owned Gournay-en-Bray Chiré-en-Montreuil Pont-de-Buis Survilliers Airbags Steering wheels and covers Airbag inflators Airbag initiators and seatbelt micro gas generators Sopronkövesd Seatbelts Seatbelts, airbags Seatbelt webbing and Airbag Cushions Airbags and steering wheels Airbag and Airbag cushions Airbag inflators Seatbelts, airbags and steering wheels Airbags and steering wheels Airbags Airbag inflators Airbags, seatbelts and steering wheels Bangalore Mysore Badli Pune Chennai Jakarta Chubu Hiroshima Taketoyo Tsukuba 24 Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Leased Leased Owned Owned Owned Owned Leased Owned Malaysia Autoliv-Hirotako Sdn Bhd Mexico Autoliv Mexico East S.A. de C.V. Autoliv Mexico S.A. de C.V. Autoliv Safety Technology de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Autoliv Steering Wheels Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. Autoliv Steering Wheels Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. Autoliv Mexico S.A. de C.V. Philippines Autoliv Cebu Safety Manufacturing, Inc. Poland Autoliv Poland Sp. zo.o. Romania Autoliv Romania S.R.L. Kuala Lumpur Seatbelts, airbags and steering wheels Owned Matamoros Lerma Tijuana Querétaro Querétaro Aguascalientes Steering wheels Seatbelts Seatbelts Airbag cushions Airbags Steering wheels Cebu Steering wheels Olawa Jelcz-Laskowice Airbag cushions Airbags Brasov Lugoj Resita Sfantu Georghe Onesti Rovinari Seatbelts, seatbelt webbing, seatbelt components, airbag inflators, steering wheels Airbag cushions Airbag cushions Steering wheels Steering wheels Seatbelts South Africa Autoliv Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd. Krügersdorp Seatbelts and airbags South Korea Autoliv Corporation Spain Autoliv BKI S.A.U. Sweden Autoliv Sverige AB Thailand Autoliv Thailand Ltd. Tunisia STE ASW3 Nadour STE ASW3 Nadour Hwasung Airbags Valencia Airbags Vårgårda Airbag inflators Chonburi Chonburi El Fahs Nadhour Seatbelts, Airbags and Steering wheels Seatbelt components Steering wheels Steering wheels Turkey Autoliv Cankor Otomotiv Emniyet Sistemleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. Autoliv Cankor Otomotiv Emniyet Sistemleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. Gebze-Subesi Gebze-Kocaeli Seatbelts Gebze-Kocaeli Airbags, Steering wheels and Seatbelt components United Kingdom Airbags International Ltd USA Autoliv ASP, Inc. Congleton Airbag cushions Brigham City Ogden Ogden Promontory Tremonton Airbag inflators Airbags Airbags and service parts Propellant Airbag initiators and seatbelt micro gas generators 25 Owned Owned Leased Leased Leased Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Leased Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Leased Owned & Leased Owned Owned Leased Owned Owned Owned Leased Owned Owned AUTOLIV TECHNICAL CENTERS AND CRASH TEST TRACKS Country/Company China Autoliv (Shanghai) Vehicle Safety System Technical Center Co., Ltd. Location Shanghai Product(s) supported Inflators and pyrotechnics customer applications, airbags, steering wheels and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with full-scale test laboratory France Autoliv France SNC Livbag SAS Autoliv Isodelta SAS Germany Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG India Autoliv India Private Ltd. Japan Autoliv Japan Ltd. Poland Autoliv Poland Sp. zo.o. Romania Autoliv Romania S.R.L. South Korea Autoliv Corporation Sweden Autoliv Development AB Autoliv Sverige AB USA Autoliv ASP, Inc. Gournay-en-Bray Pont-de-Buis Chiré-de-Montreuil Airbags and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with full-scale test laboratory Inflator and pyrotechnic development Steering wheels development and customer applications Dachau Elmshorn Customer applications and platform development, airbags with full-scale test laboratory Seatbelts with full-scale test laboratory Bangalore Airbags and seatbelts with sled testing Tsukuba Jelcz Brasov Seoul Vårgårda Vårgårda Airbags and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with sled test laboratory Airbags applications and platform development Seatbelts with sled test laboratory Airbags and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with sled test laboratory Research center Airbags customer applications, inflator and special safety products development with full- scale test laboratory Auburn Hills Ogden Airbags, steering wheels, and seatbelts customer applications and platform development with sled test laboratory Airbags, inflators and pyrotechnics customer applications and platform development 26 Item 3. Legal Proceedings In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is subject to legal proceedings brought by or against the Company and its subsidiaries. See Note 17, Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report for a summary of certain ongoing legal proceedings. Such information is incorporated into this Part I, Item 3 – “Legal Proceedings” by reference. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. 27 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Shareholder information The primary exchange market for Autoliv’s securities is the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) where Autoliv’s common stock trades under the symbol “ALV”. Autoliv’s Swedish Depositary Receipts (SDRs) are traded on NASDAQ Stockholm’s list for large market cap companies under the symbol “ALIV SDB”. Options in SDRs trade on Nasdaq Stockholm under the name “Autoliv SDB”. Options in Autoliv shares are traded on NASDAQ OMX PHLX and on NYSE Amex Options under the symbol “ALV”. Stock Performance Graph The graph and table below show the cumulative total shareholder return for our common stock since December 31, 2018. The graph compares our performance to that of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the Dow Jones US Auto Parts Index. The comparison assumes $100 was invested at the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2018. Each of the returns shown assumes that all dividends paid were reinvested. (USD) Autoliv, Inc. SP500TR Dow Jones US Auto Parts Index $ 12-31-2018 12-31-2019 12-31-2020 12-31-2021 12-31-2022 100.00 $ 100.00 100.00 124.38 $ 131.49 125.27 136.81 $ 155.68 145.34 156.65 $ 200.37 174.14 119.99 $ 164.08 126.42 12-31-2023 177.63 207.21 124.70 28 Number of shares As of December 31, 2023, the number of shares outstanding, net of treasury shares, was 82.6 million, compared to 86.2 million as of December 31, 2022. Approximately 3.7 million shares were retired during 2023. During 2023, the weighted average number of shares outstanding (excluding dilution and treasury shares) decreased to 85.0 million from 87.1 million in 2022. Assuming dilution, the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the full year 2023 decreased to 85.2 million from 87.2 million in 2022. Stock options (if exercised) and granted Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and Performance Shares (PSs) could increase the number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2023 by 0.3 million shares in the aggregate. Combined, this would add 0.4% to the number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2023. On December 31, 2023, the Company had 4.9 million treasury shares. The Company intends to retire treasury shares following repurchases on a regular basis. Shareholders Of the shares held by institutional investors, Autoliv estimates that around 33% were held by Sweden-based shareholders, around 43% by US-based shareholders and around 10% by UK-based shareholders. Dividends Autoliv has a history of paying quarterly cash dividends. Declared dividends are announced in press releases and published on Autoliv’s corporate website. The Board of Directors revisits dividends on a quarterly basis. There can be no assurance that the Board of Directors will declare dividends in the future. See Autoliv’s corporate website for additional details regarding historical dividends. Stock incentive plan Autoliv employees participate in the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Stock Incentive Plan”) and receive Autoliv stock-based awards from time to time. Additional information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan is included in Item 12 of this Annual Report. Autoliv has adopted a Stock Ownership Policy for Executives requiring the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to accumulate and hold the number of Autoliv shares having a value of twice his annual base salary. For other executives, the minimum requirement is, over time, a holding equal to each executive’s annual base salary. Stock repurchase program On November 16, 2021, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $1.5 billion or up to 17 million shares, whichever comes first, between January 2022 and the end of 2024. The table in Exhibit 26 provides information with respect to total common stock repurchases made by the Company during the three months period ended December 31, 2023 on NYSE. Period October 1-31, 2023 November 1-30, 2023 December 1-31, 2023 New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) Average Price Paid per Share (USD) (2) 258,925 859,965 393,043 $ $ $ 94.07 99.14 102.76 Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (3) Aggregate Maximum Number of Shares that Yet May Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (3) 3,858,816 4,718,781 5,111,824 13,141,184 12,281,219 11,888,176 (1) The repurchases are being executed from time to time, subject to general business and market conditions and other investment opportunities, through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans. For accounting purposes, shares repurchased under our stock repurchase programs are recorded based upon the settlement date of the applicable trade. (2) The average price paid per share in U.S. dollars exclude brokerage commissions and other costs of execution. (3) On November 16, 2021, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $1.5 billion or up to 17 million common shares, whichever comes first, between January 2022 and the end of 2024. Item 6. [RESERVED] 29 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations IMPORTANT TRENDS The discussions and analysis in this section are focused on the Company’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. Discussions of the Company's results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021 can be found in Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2022. Autoliv, Inc. (the “Company”) provides automotive safety systems to the automotive industry with a broad range of product offerings, primarily passive safety systems. In the year ended December 31, 2023, a number of factors influenced the Company’s results of operations, including: • • • • • • Industry supply chain disruptions caused high customer call-off volatility Cost inflation, especially for labor, logistics and utilities, and corresponding inflation compensation negotiations with customers Continued growth above LVP driven by price, higher content per vehicle, and execution of strong order book Order intake adding to an already strong customer base Strategic and structural initiatives Continued focus on operational excellence and quality 2023 2022 YEARS ENDED DEC. 31 (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT EPS) 7.7 % Global light vehicle production (in thousands) 7.4 % Consolidated net sales (2.3) % Operating income (0.7) pp Operating margin, % (2.7) % Net income attributable to controlling interest Earnings per share2) (2.2) % (5.4) % Net cash provided by operating activities Return on capital employed, % (0.8) pp 1) Reported figures impacted by costs for capacity alignments and antitrust related matters. See section Items affecting comparability and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. 2) Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares. Reported1) 79,818 8,842 659 7.5 423 4.85 713 17.5 Reported1) 87,323 10,475 690 6.6 488 5.72 982 17.7 9.4 % 18 % $ 4.7 % (0.9) pp 15 % 18 % 38 % 0.2 pp change change $ SUPPLY CHAIN 2023 saw global LVP growth year-over-year by around 9.4% (according to S&P Global January 2024). We saw an improvement in call- off volatility in 2023 as supply chains were less strained compared to a year earlier. However, customer call-off volatility remained higher than pre-pandemic levels, and low customer demand visibility and changes to customer call-offs with short notice still had a negative impact on our production efficiency and profitability. The unfolding situation in the Red Sea did not have any measurable impact on our operations in 2023. It is too early to estimate what impact this situation will have on our operations, directly or through our customers, going forward. INFLATION Cost pressures from labor, logistics, utilities, and other items had a negative impact on our profitability in 2023. Most of the inflationary cost pressure was offset by customer price and other compensations. Changes in raw material costs had a negligible impact on our profitability in 2023. The Company expects the raw material price changes in 2024 to be largely reflected in price changes in our products, albeit with delays of several months. We also expect continued cost pressure from inflation relating mainly to labor, but also to a lesser extent to utilities and other items, especially in Europe and the Americas. The Company continues to execute on productivity and cost reduction activities to offset these cost pressures, and we continue to seek inflation compensation from our customers. The Company believes price adjustments will gradually offset the cost inflation, with limited positive effects in the first quarter and gradual improvement as the year progresses. 30 GROWTH IMPACTED BY LIGHT VEHICLE PRODUCTION, SAFETY CONTENT PER VEHICLE, AND STRONG ORDER BOOK The most important driver for Autoliv’s sales is the LVP. During the past ten years, LVP has shown year-over-year growth with the exception of the years 2018-2020. Global LVP grew by 9.4% in 2023 - much above the 3.5% expected by S&P Global in the beginning of the year. For Europe, the LVP growth of 5.3% that was expected in the beginning of the year became an increase of 13%, as previous years' production limitations eased and some inventory restocking could take place. LVP in China also grew significantly more than what was expected in the beginning of the year, driven mainly by a multitude of successful launches of new models by domestic Chinese OEMs. Light Vehicle Production1) 2023 (000´) units % global 2022 (000´) units % global Change 2023 vs 2022 (000´) units % Americas Europe Asia North America South America China Japan South Korea India Other Asia Other Global Total 1) Source: S&P Global, January 2024 17,248 14,351 2,897 17,667 50,148 27,844 8,422 4,166 5,414 4,302 2,260 87,323 20% 16% 3% 20% 57% 32% 10% 5% 6% 5% 3% 15,861 13,064 2,797 15,698 46,049 25,513 7,263 3,695 5,105 4,473 2,210 79,818 20% 16% 4% 20% 58% 32% 9% 5% 6% 6% 3% 1,387 1,287 100 1,969 4,099 2,331 1,159 471 309 (171) 50 7,505 9% 10% 4% 13% 9% 9% 16% 13% 6% (4)% 2% 9% Chinese LVP, the world’s largest automotive market, increased by 2.3 million units or by 9.1% from 2022 to 2023. In Europe, an important market for automotive safety systems, LVP increased by 13% or by approximately 2.0 million light vehicles during the same period. In North America, LVP increased by 1.4 million units, or by 8.7% compared to 2022. During 2023, both the Americas' and Europe’s share of global LVP remained at around 20% each. China’s share was also unchanged, at 32%, while Japan’s share increased to 10% from 9% and India's share remained at 6%. Despite macro-economic uncertainties in parts of the world, we expect light vehicle markets to grow both in the medium and long term, driven by pent-up end user demand, rebuilding of new vehicle inventories and a growing GDP/capita. Due to more stringent crash test rating requirements, by institutes such as Euro NCAP, increased government regulations and increasing consumer demand for more safety in emerging markets, the Company sees vehicle manufacturers installing more airbags and more advanced seatbelt systems in vehicles. This generally takes place when new models are introduced. The safety standards of vehicles are increasing in China, India, and other growth markets such as Brazil, partially due to new government regulations and crash test rating programs. For example, the Indian government has decided on a new traffic regulation that mandates more rigid crash test standards for light vehicles. This is supporting higher installation rates of airbags and more advanced seatbelts, impacting CPV positively. Commercial customer recoveries compensating for increased raw material costs also added to CPV in 2023, partly offset by negative effects from continued productivity related pricing pressure from vehicle manufacturers. The overall increase in global CPV in 2023 was around 3% which together with the execution of the Company's strong order book, supported an organic growth (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) of around 9 percentage points above growth in global LVP. The average global safety CPV (airbags, pedestrian safety, seatbelts, and steering wheels) amounted to around $261 million in 2023. The Company believes that the more stringent crash rating requirements and consumer demand for more safety should enable the global automotive safety market to grow around 1-2 percentage points per year faster than the global LVP in the medium and long term. This excludes the impact from cost inflation related price increases. The past years’ high order intake share has resulted in the Company's sales development outperforming the underlying LVP significantly. In the past 5 years, the Company's organic sales development outpaced global LVP between 5 and 9 percentage points every year . During 2023, growth was positively affected through recent launches of several new models, including Subaru Impreza/Crosstrek, Mercedes E-Class, BMW 5 Series, and several Zeekr models. The Company estimates that the sales to Electric Vehicles (not including PHEVs) amounted to around $1.4 billion in 2023. WELL BALANCED GLOBAL FOOTPRINT The Company's regional sales mix continues to be balanced with 27% of sales in Europe, 34% in the Americas and 39% in Asia in 2023, compared to 27%, 33% and 40%, respectively, in 2022. In Asia, the Company's sales in the important Chinese market was 20% of total sales in 2023 compared to 21% in 2022. The balanced regional sales mix has been achieved through timely investments and strengthening of technical and support capabilities in growth markets. 31 ORDER INTAKE ADDING TO AN ALREADY STRONG CUSTOMER BASE The Company's order intake in 2023, with high win rates for new EV platforms with both new and traditional OEMs as well as for ICE platforms, added to the Company's already strong base, which includes supplying products to more than 1,300 vehicle models and around 100 car brands. The order intake in 2023 supports the Company's ability to defend its around 45% sales market share in the near and medium term. The Company estimates that its market share increased from around 43% in 2022 to around 45% in 2023. The lead time from order intake to start of production is typically 1-3 years. During this period the products are engineered into the vehicle to provide the expected protection for occupants in case of a crash and to meet legal and regulatory requirements, as well as other requirements from the vehicle manufacturer. This investment in new products is the main factor of RD&E expenses, net. Additionally, the Company has to build up production capacity, in the form of new lines, to meet future product launches. The Company's order intake share for 2023 continued on a high level. The estimated life-time sales for all orders booked in 2023 is around $11.8 billion, an increase compared to around $10.7 billion in 2022. The 2023 order intake included high win rates with relatively new automakers and for new EV platforms as well as ICE platforms with traditional OEMs. The Company estimates that around 45% of total order intake in 2023 was for EV platforms, while order intake from new automakers accounted for around 25% of all order intake. In China, the Company estimates that around 50% of order intake in 2023 was with domestic Chinese OEMs, which supports our expectation that domestic OEMS in China will account for close to 40% of the Company's sales in China in 2024. This is an increase from 28% in 2023. New order intake is defined as the sales value of awards for future business, received within that year. The life time value is calculated using detailed assumptions of price and volumes over the years of production and the exchange rates prevailing at the time of receiving the order. STRATEGIC INITIATIVES AND STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS 2023 light vehicle market was impacted by a distressed global automotive supply chain with continued high customer call-off volatility and inflationary pressure on costs for labor, logistics and utilities. In response, Autoliv management continued to implement strict cost control measures, as well as initiating significant structural cost reduction measures. In June 2023, the Company communicated a cost reduction framework which included the intent to reduce our indirect headcount by up to 2,000, and to improve direct labor productivity equivalent to up to a 6,000 direct workforce reduction. More details on these initiatives were communicated on July 13, 2023, October 5, 2023, and on October 30, 2023. Based on the intended indirect workforce reductions in these three announcements, the Company estimates that the annual cost reductions will amount to around $130 million in total annual savings when fully implemented, with around $50 million in savings in 2024, which is expected to increase to around $100 million in 2025. We do not expect to announce further major reduction initiative details within this framework. Further reduction of global headcount as part of the structural initiative is expected to be through minor actions and natural attrition with limited accruals. At the end of 2023, around 75% of the planned indirect reductions were detailed and announced. We also saw positive results on direct labor efficiency towards the end of 2023. The provision, net of reversals, for restructuring activities in 2023 amounted to $210 million compared to $13 million in 2022. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had $213 million reserved in its balance sheet related to restructuring compared to $32 million last year. For more information, see Note 11, Restructuring, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. In addition to the structural improvements outlined above, the Company continues to implement the strategic initiatives to improve the efficiency of its value chain from end to end, not least through the Autoliv Production System and increased digitalization and automation. With several hundred projects in implementation or undergoing development, the Company has a high pace in the planning and implementation of the strategic initiatives and structural improvements. These initiatives are key drivers to the Company's targets and building the foundation to continue to create shareholder value. 32 IMPROVED EFFICIENCIES THROUGH OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE Pricing pressure is an inherent part of the automotive supplier business. Price reductions are generally higher on newer products with strong volume growth compared to older products, where both the possibilities to re-design the product to reduce costs and market growth are less. Price reductions can also depend on the business cycle and raw material price development. For the five-year period 2017- 2021, the Company estimates the average reduction of product prices on existing programs to have been in the range of around 2-4% annually. In 2022, the pricing environment changed to some extent due to high raw material price and cost increases, which led to renegotiations with customers regarding commercial terms. These discussions resulted in a net positive price development, gradually implemented throughout the year. This was also the case in 2023, and is expected for 2024 as well. A key strategy for Autoliv to be and to remain cost competitive is to reduce labor costs, through continuously implementing productivity improvement programs, optimizing the Company's production footprint, and instituting restructuring and capacity alignment activities as well as other actions to address the Company's cost structure. The Company's productivity improvement target is to achieve at least 5% savings per year. To meet this target, Autoliv has developed a set of strategies to reduce costs in manufacturing: • • • Autoliv production system (APS) is based on lean manufacturing methodology which aims to continuously increase output with less resources. APS provides the target conditions and tools to achieve the delivery of goods and services at the right time, in the right amount, at the required quality and at the lowest cost possible to all the Company's customers. Autoliv One Product One Process (1P1P) strategy focuses on product and process standardization and reducing cost and complexity. The 1P1P strategy, combined with initiatives to reduce costs for components from external suppliers, ensures that the Company continuously optimize its supply base footprint, consolidate purchase volumes to fewer suppliers, improve productivity in the Company's supply chain, standardize components and redesign its products. Strategic Initiatives, including Automation, Digitalization, Supply Chain Management Effectiveness and RD&E Effectiveness. The Company's historic experience is that the continuous improvement strategies have enabled productivity improvement at or above its target of 5%. However, the Company has not achieved its 5% productivity target since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, due to the related decline in LVP in 2020 and the high volatility in customer call-offs in 2021, 2022 and 2023 driven by the industry wide supply chain instability, especially for semiconductors. The Company foresees opportunities for further productivity on organic sales growth and increased call-off stability when global supply chains have stabilized at pre-pandemic levels, but also from increasing use of automation in its assembly for lean manufacturing processes. Additionally, automated cells typically perform the manufacturing process with reduced variability. This results in greater control and consistency of product quality. FOCUS ON QUALITY The number of vehicle recalls in the automotive industry continues on a relatively high level. The Company expects overall recall numbers to remain high for years to come and, although the Company strives for the highest quality in its processes, it cannot be ruled out that the Company may also be adversely impacted by a future recall. Quality has been and always will be the Company's number one priority, and the Company continues to sharpen its focus in this area. The Company now holds a global market share in passive safety of around 45%, while the Company has been involved in around 2% of recalls in the industry in the past ten years. This indicates that the Company is delivering on its quality strategy. For more information see product warranty and recalls in Note 12, Product Related Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. CHANGES IN COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE During the past eight years, Autoliv experienced significant changes in its competitive landscape. In 2015, TRW, a key competitor in passive safety, was acquired by German group ZF Friedrichshafen. In 2016, Key Safety Systems (“KSS”) was acquired by Ningbo Joyson Electronic Corp. Beginning in 2014, Takata, Autoliv's largest competitor at the time, experienced severe issues and recalls related to malfunctioning airbag inflators, leading the company to file for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. and Japan. In 2018, KSS substantially acquired all of Takata's global assets and operations and combined it with KSS, forming the new company Joyson Safety Systems (JSS). 33 CAPITAL STRUCTURE The Company’s net debt stood at $1,367 million on December 31, 2023. This was an increase of $184 million compared to December 31, 2022. Total interest-bearing debt at December 31, 2023 amounted to $1,862 million, an increase of $96 million compared to December 31, 2022. Cash flow from operations was $982 million in 2023 and $713 million in 2022. Capital expenditures, net amounted to $569 million in 2023 and $485 million in 2022. During 2023 and 2022 the Company paid dividends of $225 million and $224 million, respectively. It is the Company’s policy to maintain a financial leverage commensurate with a “strong investment grade credit rating”. The long-term target is to have a leverage ratio (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) of around 1.0x and to be within the range of 0.5x to 1.5x. At December 31, 2023, the current leverage ratio is 1.2x. The Company monitors its capital structure and the financial markets closely and intends to maintain a high level of financial flexibility while being shareholder friendly. As part of the adjustment of the capital structure, the Company historically has repurchased shares of its common stock. During 2023 and 2022, the Company repurchased and retired 3.67 million and 1.44 million shares, respectively, under the stock repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors in November 2021. This stock repurchase program authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $1.5 billion or up to 17 million shares (whichever comes first) between January 2022 and the end of 2024. In addition, in 2022, the Company retired 10 million shares of common stock that has been held in treasury. These shares were acquired between 2008 and 2014 under the prior stock repurchase program. After the retirement, the Company continues to hold around 4.9 million shares of common stock in treasury. OUTLOOK FOR 2024 The Company's guidance for 2024 is mainly based on our customer call-offs, a full year 2024 global LVP decline of around 1%, our achievement of our targeted cost compensation effects and a reduction in customer call-off volatility. Financial measure Organic sales growth Foreign currency impact on net sales Adjusted operating margin 1) Tax rate 2) Operating cash flow 3) Capital expenditures, net % of sales 1) Excluding effects from capacity alignments, antitrust related matters and other discrete items. 2) Excluding unusual tax items. 3) Excluding unusual items. Full year indication Around 5% Around 0% Around 10.5% Around 28% Around $1.2 billion Around 5.5% The forward-looking non-U.S. GAAP financial measures above are provided on a non-U.S. GAAP basis. Autoliv has not provided a U.S. GAAP reconciliation of these measures because items that impact these measures, such as costs related to capacity alignments and antitrust matters, cannot be reasonably predicted or determined. As a result, such reconciliation is not available without unreasonable efforts and Autoliv is unable to determine the probable significance of the unavailable information. SIGNIFICANT LEGAL MATTERS See Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Note 17 Contingent Liabilities to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. 34 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Consolidated net sales in 2023 increased by 18.5% compared to 2022. Excluding positive currency translation effects of 0.3%, the organic sales increased (Non-U.S. GAAP measure, see reconciliation table below) by 18.2%. Sales by Product Airbags, Steering Wheels and Other2) Seatbelt products and Other2) Total 1) Effects from currency translations. 2) Including Corporate and Other sales. $ $ Airbags, Steering Wheels and Other Years ended December 31, Components of change in net sales 2023 2022 Reported change Currency effects 1) Organic 3) 7,055 3,420 10,475 $ $ 5,807 3,035 8,842 21 % 13 % 18 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 0.3 % 21 % 12 % 18 % Sales for all major product categories increased organically (Non-U.S. GAAP measure, see reconciliation table above) during the year. The largest contributor to the increase was steering wheels and inflatable curtains, followed by side airbags and passenger airbags. Seatbelt Products and Other Sales for seatbelt products and other increased organically (Non-U.S. GAAP measure, see reconciliation table above) in all major regions during the year. The main contributor to the increase was Europe, followed by Asia excluding China, the Americas and China. Sales by Region Years ended December 31, Components of change in net sales 2023 2022 Reported change Currency effects 1) Organic 3) Asia Whereof: China Asia excl. China Americas Europe Total 1) Effects from currency translations. $ $ 4,072 2,105 1,968 3,526 2,877 10,475 $ $ 3,521 1,883 1,638 2,967 2,355 8,842 16 % 12 % 20 % 19 % 22 % 18 % (4.3)% (4.8)% (3.8)% 3.5 % 3.1 % 0.3 % 20 % 17 % 24 % 15 % 19 % 18 % Autoliv’s global sales increased organically (Non-U.S. GAAP measure, see reconciliation table above) by 18.2% compared to 2022, which was around 9 percentage points better than global LVP (according to S&P Global, January 2024). Sales increased organically in all regions. The around 9pp outperformance was driven by new product launches and price increases. Autoliv outperformed LVP by around 15pp in Asia excluding China, by around 8pp in China, by around 7pp in Europe and by around 7pp in the Americas. 2023 Organic Growth1) Autoliv Main growth drivers Main decline drivers Americas 15% Honda, Nissan, Mercedes Ford, BMW, Renault Europe 19% China 17% Asia excl. China 24% Global 18% Stellantis, VW, Mercedes Honda, Great Wall, Mercedes Toyota, Hyundai, Subaru Honda, Toyota, Mercedes Mitsubishi Nissan, Renault, BMW Renault Ford 35 Condensed Statement of Income (Dollars in millions, except per share data) Net Sales Gross profit % of sales S, G&A % of sales R, D&E, net % of sales Amortization of Intangibles Other income (expense), net Operating income % of sales Adjusted operating income1) % of sales Financial and non-operating items, net Income before taxes Income taxes Tax rate Net income Earnings per share, diluted2) Adjusted earnings per share, diluted1,2) 1) Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares. 2) Non-U.S. GAAP Measure. Gross Profit Years ended December 31, 2022 2023 $ 10,475 1,822 $ 8,842 1,396 17.4 % (498) (4.8)% (425) (4.1)% (2) (207) 690 6.6 % 920 8.8 % (77) 612 (123) 20.1% 489 5.72 8.19 15.8 % (437) (4.9)% (390) (4.4)% (3) 93 659 7.5 % 598 6.8 % (56) 603 (178) 29.5% 425 4.85 4.40 Change 18 % 30 % 1.6 pp 14 % 0.2 pp 8.8 % 0.4 pp (24)% n/a 4.7 % (0.9)pp 54 % 2.0 pp 39 % 1.5 % (31)% (9.4)pp 15 % 18 % 86 % In 2023, gross profit increased by $425 million and the gross margin increased by 1.6 pp compared to 2022. The gross profit increase was primarily driven by price increases, volume growth and lower costs for premium freight. This was partly offset by increased costs for personnel related to higher volumes and wage inflation as well as higher costs for energy Operating Income Operating income increased in 2023 by $31 million, mainly due to higher gross profit, partly offset by the changes in Other income (expense), net and the higher costs for S,G&A and R,D&E, net. Selling, General and Administrative (S,G&A) expenses increased in 2023 by $61 million, mainly due to increased costs for personnel and projects. S,G&A costs in relation to sales decreased from 4.9 % to 4.8%. Research, Development & Engineering (R,D&E) expenses, net increased in 2023 by $35 million, mainly due to higher costs for personnel and lower engineering income. R,D&E, net, in relation to sales decreased from 4.4% to 4.1%. Other income (expense), net decreased by $300 million in 2023 compared to the previous year, mainly due to that the prior year was positively impacted by around an $80 million gain from the sale of a property in Japan and around $20 million from a patent litigation settlement, partly offset by around $10 million in capacity alignment provisions for the closure of a plant in South Korea while 2023 was negatively impacted by around $218 million in accrual for capacity alignment. Financial and Non-operating Items, net Financial and non-operating items, net, costs decreased by $22 million in 2023 compared to previous year, mainly due to increased interest expense as an effect of higher debt and higher interest rates. Income Taxes The tax rate for 2023 was 20.1%, compared to 29.5% in 2022. Discrete tax items, net, decreased the tax rate in 2023 by 17.3pp. The decrease is mainly related to a net deferred tax asset recognized in the fourth quarter due to the transfer of certain assets and operations as part of restructuring activities. Discrete tax items, net decreased the tax rate in 2022 by 2.5pp. 36 Net Income and Earnings Per Share Net income in 2023 increased by $64 million compared to 2022. Earnings per share, diluted increased by $0.87 compared to a year earlier, where the main drivers was $0.35 from higher operating income and $0.63 from lower income tax, partly mitigated by $0.27 from financial items. The weighted average number of shares outstanding assuming dilution in 2023 was 85.2 million compared to 87.2 million in 2022. NON-U.S. GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES In this annual report, the Company sometimes refers to non-U.S. GAAP measures that the Company and securities analysts use in measuring Autoliv’s performance. The Company believes that these measures assist management and investors in analyzing trends in the Company’s business for the reasons given below. Investors should not consider these non-U.S. GAAP measures as substitutes for, but rather as additions to, financial reporting measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-U.S. GAAP measures have been identified, as applicable, in each section of this annual report with tabular presentations provided below, reconciling them to U.S. GAAP. It should be noted that these measures, as defined, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Organic Sales The Company analyzes its sales trends and performance as changes in “organic sales growth” or “organic sales decline”, because the Company currently generates approximately three quarters of net sales in currencies other than the reporting currency (i.e. U.S. dollars) and currency rates have proven to be rather volatile. Organic sales present the increase or decrease in the overall U.S. dollar net sales on a comparable basis, allowing separate discussions of the impact of acquisitions/divestitures and exchange rates. See tabular reconciliations above, that present changes in “organic sales growth” as reconciled to the change in total U.S. GAAP net sales. Trade working capital Due to the need to optimize cash generation to create value for the Company's shareholders, management focuses on operationally derived trade working capital as defined in the table below. The reconciling items used to derive this measure are, by contrast, managed as part of the Company's overall management of cash and debt, but they are not part of the responsibilities of day-to-day operations management. Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP measure to “Trade working capital” (dollars in millions) DECEMBER 31 Receivables, net Inventories, net Accounts payable Trade working capital Net debt $ $ 2023 2022 2,198 1,012 (1,978) 1,232 $ $ 1,907 969 (1,693) 1,183 As part of efficiently managing the Company’s overall cost of funds, the Company routinely enter into “debt-related derivatives” (DRD) as part of its debt management. Creditors and credit rating agencies use net debt adjusted for DRD in their analyses of the Company’s debt and therefore the Company provides this non-U.S. GAAP measure. See reconciliation table below. DRD are fair value adjustments to the carrying value of the underlying debt. Also included in the DRD is the unamortized fair value adjustment related to discontinued fair value hedges, which will be amortized over the remaining life of the debt. By adjusting for DRD, the total financial liability of net debt is disclosed without grossing debt up with currency or interest fair values. Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP measure to “Net debt” (dollars in millions) DECEMBER 31 Short-term debt Long-term debt Total debt Cash and cash equivalents Debt issuance cost/Debt-related derivatives, net Net debt $ $ 2023 2022 538 1,324 1,862 (498) 3 1,367 $ $ 711 1,054 1,766 (594) 12 1,184 37 Adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin and adjusted EPS Adjusted operating margin and adjusted EPS are non-U.S. GAAP measures the Company uses to evaluate its business, because the Company believes it assists investors and analysts in comparing the Company's performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that are non-operational or non-recurring in nature (such as costs related to capacity alignments, costs related to antitrust matters and for EPS unusual tax items) and that the Company does not believe are indicative of its core operating performance and underlying business trends. Adjusted operating margin and adjusted EPS, as shown in the table below, should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP, including operating margin and EPS. Items affecting comparability (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT EPS) Operating income Operating margin, % Income before income taxes Net income attributable to controlling interest Capital employed Return on capital employed, % 2) Return on total equity, % 3) Earnings per share, diluted 4 2023 Adjust- ments1) 230 $ 2.2% 230 210 210 5.3% 7.2% $ 2.46 Reported 690 $ 6.6% 612 488 3,937 17.7% 19.0% 5.72 $ Non- U.S. GAAP 920 $ 8.8% 842 697 4,147 23.1% 26.2% $ 8.19 $ Reported 659 $ 7.5% 603 423 3,810 17.5% 16.3% 4.85 2022 Adjust- ments1) (61) $ (0.7)% (61) (39) (39) (1.5)% (1.3)% $ (0.45) Non- U.S. GAAP $ $ 598 6.8% 542 384 3,771 16.0% 15.0% 4.40 1) Represents costs for capacity alignments, antitrust related matters and the Andrews litigation settlement. See table below for a disaggregation of these costs. 2) Operating income and income from equity method investments, relative to average capital employed. 3) Net Income relative to average total equity for the year. 4) Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares. Adjustment Per share $ (0.70) — — (0.70) 0.25 (0.45) 87.2 $ Items included in Non-U.S. GAAP adjustments (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT EPS) Capacity alignment The Andrews litigation settlement Antitrust related matters Total adjustments to Operating income Tax on Non-U.S. GAAP adjustments1) Total adjustments to Net Income Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted2) Adjustment Return on capital employed Adjustment Return on capital employed, % Adjustment Return on total equity Adjustment Return on total equity, % 2023 2022 Adjustment Millions Adjustment Per share Adjustment Millions $ $ $ $ 218 8 4 230 (20) 210 230 5.3 % 210 7.2 % $ $ 2.56 0.09 0.05 2.70 (0.24) 2.46 85.2 $ $ $ $ (61) — — (61) 22 (39) (61) (1.5)% (39) (1.3)% 1) The tax is calculated based on the tax laws in the respective jurisdiction(s) of the adjustment(s). 2) Annualized average number of outstanding shares. 38 LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES, AND FINANCIAL POSITION (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) Net cash provided by operating activities Net cash used in investing activities Net cash used in financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents Decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES Years ended December 31 2022 2023 982 (569) (490) (20) (96) 594 498 $ $ 713 (485) (531) (73) (375) 969 594 $ $ Cash flow from operations, together with available financial resources and credit facilities, are expected to be sufficient to fund the Company’s anticipated working capital requirements, capital expenditures and future dividend payments. Net cash provided by operating activities was $982 million in 2023 compared to $713 million in 2022. The increase of $269 million was mainly due to more positive working capital effects. At December 31, 2023, trade working capital (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures above) amounted to $1,232 million corresponding to 11% of net sales compared to $1,183 million and 13% at December 31, 2022. Receivables outstanding in relation to sales (see Glossary and Definitions for definition) were 20% at December 31, 2023, compared to 20% at December 31, 2022. Factoring agreements did not have any material impact on receivables outstanding for 2023 or 2022. Inventory outstanding in relation to sales (see Glossary and Definitions for definition) was 9% at December 31, 2023, compared to 10% at December 31, 2022. Payables outstanding in relation to sales (see Glossary and Definitions for definition) were 18% at December 31, 2023 compared to 18% at December 31, 2022. NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES In 2023 and 2022, net cash used in investing activities amounted to $569 million and $485 million, respectively. The Company's investing activities primarily consist of investments in property, plant and equipment. Net cash generated by operating activities continued to sufficiently cover capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment. The net increase of $84 million compared to previous year was mainly due to the impact on the prior year by $95 million in proceeds from the sale of property in Japan. In relation to net sales, capital expenditures, net was 5.4% compared to 5.5% in previous year. Depreciation and amortization totaled $378 million in 2023 compared to $363 million in 2022. During the years 2023 and 2022, a majority of the Company's investments were for production capacity to support new product launches and automation projects for improved efficiency. NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES Net cash used in financing activities amounted to $490 million and $531 million for the years 2023 and 2022, respectively. In 2023, the Company paid dividends of $225 million. In 2022, the Company paid dividends of $224 million. INCOME TAXES The Company has reserves for taxes that may become payable in future periods as a result of tax audits. At any given time, the Company is undergoing tax audits covering multiple years in several tax jurisdictions. Ultimate outcomes are uncertain but could, in future periods, have a significant impact on the Company’s cash flows. See discussions of income taxes under Significant Accounting Policies in this section, Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 5, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. PENSION ARRANGEMENTS The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering nearly half of the U.S. employees. As of December 31, 2021, the main U.S defined benefit plan was frozen for further benefits. Many of the Company’s non-U.S. employees are also covered by pension arrangements. At December 31, 2023, the Company’s net pension liability (i.e. the actual funded status) for its U.S. and non-U.S. plans was $159 million compared to $154 million at December 31, 2022. 39 The plans had a total net unamortized actuarial loss before tax of $39 million recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2023, compared to $44 million at December 31, 2022. The amortization of the loss is expected to be $2 million in 2024. Total pension expense associated with the defined benefit plans was $21 million in 2023 and $11 million in 2022, and is expected to be $18 million in 2024. The $10 million increase in 2023 pension expense was mainly due to the higher interest cost for the non-U.S plans in 2023 as well as 2022 was positively impacted by gains from curtailments and settlements. The Company contributed $11 million to its defined benefit plans in 2023 and $22 million in 2022. The Company expects to contribute $16 million to these plans in 2024 and is currently projecting a yearly funding at approximately the same level in the subsequent years. For further information about retirement plans see Note 18, Retirement Plans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. SHAREHOLDER RETURNS In 2023 and 2022, the Company paid cash dividends of $225 million and $224 million in dividends, respectively. The Company repurchased shares to an amount of $352 million and $115 million in 2023 and 2022, respectively. EQUITY During 2023, total equity decreased by $56 million to $2,570 million as of December 31, 2023. The change was mainly due to dividends paid to shareholders of $226 million, share repurchases of $356 million, partly offset by $489 million from net income and positive foreign exchange effects of $20 million. TREASURY ACTIVITES DEBT AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS The Company's total debt as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $1,862 million and $1,766 million, respectively. The Company had a net debt position (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures) at December 31, 2023 and 2022 of $1,367 million and $1,184 million, respectively. In February 2024, the Company issued 5.5-year notes for a total of €500 million in the Eurobond market. The notes carry a coupon of 3.625% and matures in August 2029. In March 2023, the Company issued 5-year notes for a total of €500 million in the Eurobond market. The notes carry a coupon of 4.25% and matures in March 2028. In May 2022, the Company refinanced its existing revolving credit facility (RCF) of $1,100 million. The facility, syndicated among 11 banks, matures in May 2028 and has an extension option for an additional year. The Company pays a commitment fee on the undrawn amount of 0.15%, representing 35% of the applicable margin, which is 0.425% (given the Company’s rating of “BBB” from S&P Global Ratings). Borrowings under the facility are unsecured. At December 31, 2023, the Company’s unutilized long-term credit facilities were $1,100 million, represented by the RCF. This facility is not subject to any financial covenants nor is any other substantial financing of Autoliv. In June 2020, the Company utilized its SEK 3,000 million facility with Swedish Export Credit Corporation which was signed in May 2020. The SEK 3,000 million loan mature in 2025 carrying a floating interest rate of 3M STIBOR +1.85%. In 2014, the Company issued and sold long-term debt securities in a U.S. Private Placement pursuant to a Note Purchase and Guaranty Agreement dated April 23, 2014, by and among Autoliv ASP Inc., the Company and the purchasers listed therein. As of December 31, 2023, $767 million remains outstanding from the 2014 issuance. The Company has a €3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Program in place for being able to issue notes to be traded on the Global Exchange Market of Euronext Dublin. At December 31, 2023, €500 million had been issued under this program. At December 31, 2023, Autoliv’s long-term credit rating from S&P Global Ratings was BBB with stable outlook. The Company aims to maintain a strong investment grade credit rating. For additional information about the Company's debt and credit arrangements, see Note 13, Debt and Credit Agreements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. FACTORING During 2023 and 2022, the Company sold receivables and discounted notes related to selected customers. These factoring arrangements increase cash while reducing accounts receivable and customer risks. At December 31, 2023, the Company had received $209 million for sold receivables without recourse and discounted notes with a discount cost of $3 million during the year, compared to $174 million at December 31, 2022 with a discount cost of $2 million recorded in Other non-operating items, net. 40 NUMBER OF SHARES At December 31, 2023, 82.6 million shares were outstanding (net of 4.9 million treasury shares), a 4.1% decrease from 86.2 million one year earlier. The number of shares outstanding is expected to increase by 0.3 million when all Restricted Stock Units (RSU) and Performance Shares (PSs) vest and if all stock options (SOs) to key employees are exercised, see Note 16, Stock Incentive Plans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. In 2023, the Company repurchased and retired 3.67 million shares equal to $352 million. During 2022, Autoliv repurchased and retired 1.44 million shares, equal to $115 million. In 2022, the Company also retired 10 million shares of common stock that had been repurchased under a prior stock repurchase program and since held in treasury. Under the current stock repurchase program authorized by the Board to repurchase up to $1.5 billion, or 17 million common shares (whichever comes first), between January 2022 and the end of 2024. Contractual Obligations and Commitments Contractual obligations include debt, sponsored defined benefit plans, lease and purchase obligations that are enforceable and legally binding on the Company. For material contractual debt obligations as of December 31, 2023, see Note 13, Debt and Credit Agreements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. Operating lease obligations represent the payment obligations (undiscounted cash flows) under leases classified as operating leases. Capital lease obligations are not material. See Note 3, Leases, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. There are no unconditional purchase obligations other than short-term obligations related to inventory, services, tooling, and property, plant and equipment purchased in the ordinary course of business. Purchase agreements with suppliers entered into in the ordinary course of business do not generally include fixed quantities. Quantities and delivery dates are established in “call off plans” accessible electronically for all customers and suppliers involved. Communicated “call off plans” for production material from suppliers are normally reflected in equivalent commitments from Autoliv customers. The Company sponsors defined benefit plans that cover a significant portion of the Company's U.S. employees and certain non-U.S. employees. The pension plans in the U.S. are funded in conformity with the minimum funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Funding for the Company's pension plans in other countries is based upon plan provisions, actuarial recommendations and/or statutory requirements. Due to volatility associated with future changes in interest rates and plan asset returns, the Company cannot predict with reasonable reliability the timing and amounts of future funding requirements. The Company may elect to make contributions in excess of the minimum funding requirements for the U.S. plans in response to investment performance and changes in interest rates, or when the Company believes that it is financially advantageous to do so and based on other capital requirements. See Note 18, Retirement Plans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. Risks and Risk Management The Company is exposed to several categories of risks. They can broadly be categorized as operational risks, strategic risks and financial risks. Some of the major risks in each category are described below. There are also other risks that could have a material effect on the Company’s results and financial position, and the description below is not complete but should be read in conjunction with the discussion of risks described in Item 1A above, which contains a description of the Company's material risks. As described below, the Company has taken several mitigating actions, applied numerous strategies, adopted policies, and introduced control and reporting systems to reduce and mitigate these risks. In addition, the Company from time to time identifies and evaluates emerging or changing risks to the Company in order to ensure that identified risks and related risk management are updated in this fast- moving environment. Operational Risks LIGHT VEHICLE PRODUCTION Around 30% of Autoliv’s costs are fixed; therefore, short-term earnings are dependent on sales volumes and highly dependent on capacity utilization in the Company’s plants. Global LVP is an indicator of the Company’s sales development. Ultimately, however, sales are determined by the production levels for the individual vehicle models for which Autoliv is a supplier (see Dependence on Customers). The Company’s sales are split over several hundred contracts covering more than 1,300 vehicle models. This moderates the effect of changes in vehicle demand of individual countries and regions as well as production issues. The risk of fluctuating sales has also been mitigated by Autoliv’s rapid expansion in Asia and other growth markets, which has reduced the Company’s former high dependence on sales in Europe to a diversified mix with Europe, the Americas and Asia each accounting for approximately 27%, 34% and 39%, respectively, of the Company's 2023 total sales. It is the Company’s strategy to reduce the risks associated with fluctuating LVP by using temporary personnel in direct production, when appropriate. During 2023 and 2022, the level of temporary personnel in relation to total personnel in direct production remained flat at 41 13%. To reduce the potential impact of unusual fluctuations in the production of vehicle models supplied by the Company such as during the financial crisis in 2008-2009 and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021 – it is also necessary for the Company to be prepared to quickly adapt the level of permanent employees as well as fixed cost production capacity. PRICING PRESSURE Pricing pressure from customers is an inherent part of the automotive components business. The historical extent of price reductions varies from year to year and takes the form of one time give backs, reductions in direct sales prices and/or discounted reimbursements for engineering work. In response, Autoliv is continuously engaged in efforts to reduce costs and to provide customers added value by developing new products. Generally, the speed by which these cost-reduction programs generate results will, to a large extent, determine the future profitability of the Company. The various cost-reduction programs are, to a considerable extent, interrelated. This interrelationship makes it difficult to isolate the impact of costs on any single program, therefore, the Company monitors key measures such as costs in relation to sales and productivity. In 2023, due to cost pressures from labor, logistics, utilities, and other items the Company engaged in extensive negotiations with its customers regarding compensations. COMPONENT COSTS AND RAW MATERIAL PRICES The cost of direct materials was approximately 55% of sales in 2023. The main raw materials being used as input material for the Company's operations are steel, textiles, plastic and non-ferrous metals. The Company still sees effects coming from import tariffs and trade barriers across borders. These barriers are impacting the raw material market and creating pricing and availability uncertainties. There is also volatility in the sea freight rates driven by geopolitical events. Inflation was significant across raw materials and services in 2023. The Company took actions, including pricing discussions with customers and suppliers, competitive sourcing and exploring alternative materials. LEGAL The Company is involved from time to time in regulatory, commercial, and contractual legal proceedings that may be significant, and the Company’s business may suffer as a result of adverse outcomes of current or future legal proceedings. These claims may include, without limitation, commercial or contractual disputes, including disputes with the Company’s suppliers and customers, intellectual property matters, alleged violations of laws, rules or regulations, governmental investigations, personal injury claims, product liability claims, environmental issues, tax and customs matters, and employment matters. A substantial legal liability or adverse regulatory outcome and the substantial cost to defend the litigation or regulatory proceedings may have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results, financial condition, cash flows and reputation. No assurances can be given that such proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s profitability and consolidated financial position, or that reserves or insurance will mitigate such impact. See Note 17, Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein and Item 3 – Legal Proceedings. PRODUCT WARRANTY AND RECALLS If our products are alleged to fail to perform as expected or are defective, the Company may be exposed to various claims for damages and compensation. Such claims may result in costs and other losses to the Company even where the relevant product is eventually found to have functioned properly. If a product (actually or allegedly) fails to perform as expected or is defective, we may face warranty and recall claims. If such actual or alleged failure or defect results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage, we may also face product liability and other claims. The Company may experience material warranty, recall, product or other liability claims or losses in the future, and the Company may incur significant cost to defend against such claims. The Company may be required to participate in a recall involving its products. Each vehicle manufacturer has its own practices regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers. Government safety regulators also have policies and practices with respect to recalls. As suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process and assume more of the vehicle assembly functions, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly looking to their suppliers for contribution when faced with recalls and product liability claims. In addition, with global platforms and procedures, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly evaluating our quality performance on a global basis. Any one or more quality, warranty or other recall issue(s), including the ones affecting few units and/or having a small financial impact, may cause a vehicle manufacturer to implement measures which may have a severe impact on the Company’s operations, such as a temporary or prolonged suspension of new orders or the Company’s ability to bid for new business. In addition, over time, there is a risk that the number of vehicles affected by a failure or defect will increase significantly (as would the Company’s costs), since our products often use global designs and are increasingly based on or utilize the same or similar parts, components, or solutions. Although quality has always been a central focus in the automotive industry, especially for safety products, our customers and regulators have become increasingly attentive to quality with even less tolerance for any deviations, which has resulted in an increase in the number of automotive recalls. This trend is likely to continue as automobile manufacturers introduce even stricter quality requirements and 42 regulating agencies and other authorities increase the level of scrutiny given to vehicle safety issues. A warranty recall or a product liability claim brought against the Company in excess of the Company’s insurance may have a material adverse effect on its business and/or financial results. Vehicle manufacturers are also increasingly requiring their external suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and bear the costs of repair and replacement of such products under new vehicle warranties. A vehicle manufacturer may attempt to hold the Company responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement costs of defective products under new vehicle warranties when the product supplied did not perform as represented. Additionally, a customer may not allow us to bid for expiring or new business until certain remedial steps have been taken. Accordingly, the future costs of warranty claims by the Company’s customers may be material. The Company’s warranty reserves are based upon management’s best estimates of amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims. Management regularly evaluates the appropriateness of these reserves and adjusts them when we believe it is appropriate to do so. However, the final amounts determined to be due could differ materially from the Company’s recorded estimates. We believe our established reserves are adequate to cover potential warranty settlements typically seen in our business. The Company’s strategy is to follow a stringent procedure when developing new products and technologies and to apply a proactive “zero-defect” quality policy (see section Quality Management). In addition, the Company maintains a program of insurance, which includes commercial insurance, self-insurance, or a combination of both approaches, for potential recall and product liability claims in amounts and on terms that it believes are reasonable and prudent based on our prior claims experience. However, such insurance may not be sufficient to cover every possible claim that can arise in the Company’s businesses, now or in the future, or may not always will be available should the Company, now or in the future, wish to extend, renew, increase or otherwise adjust such insurance. In recent years, the cost of recall and product liability insurance as well as the Company’s level of self-insurance and deductibles has increased. Management’s decision regarding what insurance to procure is also impacted by the cost for such insurance. As a result, the Company may face material losses in excess of the insurance coverage procured. A substantial recall or liability in excess of coverage levels could therefore have a material adverse effect on the Company. ENVIRONMENTAL Most of the Company’s manufacturing processes consist of the assembly of components. As a result, the environmental impact from the Company’s plants is generally modest. While the Company’s businesses from time to time are subject to environmental investigations, there are no material environmental-related cases pending against the Company. Therefore, Autoliv does not incur (or expect to incur) any material costs or capital expenditures associated with maintaining facilities compliant with U.S. or non-U.S. environmental requirements. To reduce environmental risk, the Company has implemented an environmental management system in all plants globally and has adopted an environmental policy (see corporate website www.autoliv.com). Autoliv is subject to a number of environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations. Such requirements are complex and are generally becoming more stringent over time. There can be no assurance that these requirements will not change in the future, or that the Company will at all times be in compliance with all such requirements and regulations, despite its intention to be. The Company may also find itself subject, possibly due to changes in legislation or other regulation, to environmental liabilities based on the activities of its predecessor entities or of businesses acquired. Such liability could be based on activities which are not related to the Company’s current activities. TRADE Autoliv is subject to various international trade regulations and regimes and changes in these regimes could lead to increased compliance costs and costs of raw materials and other components. In addition, political conditions leading to trade conflicts and the imposition of tariffs or other trade barriers between countries in which the Company does business could increase its costs of doing business. Strategic Risks REGULATIONS In addition to vehicle production, the Company’s market is driven by the safety content per vehicle, which is affected by new regulations and new vehicle rating programs, in addition to consumer demand for new safety technologies. The most important regulations are the seatbelt installation laws that exist in all vehicle-producing countries. Many countries also have strict enforcement laws on the wearing of seatbelts. Another significant vehicle safety regulation is the U.S. federal law that, since 1997, requires frontal airbags for both the driver and the front-seat passenger in all new vehicles sold in the U.S. In 2007, the U.S. adopted new regulations for head impact and enhanced thorax protection in side impact crashes, which now have been fully phased-in. China introduced a vehicle rating program in 2006 and during the past 16 years this China NCAP, together with the additional Chinese rating program, CIASI, from 2017, drive Chinese vehicle safety performance and safety content with regards to crashworthiness and occupant protection. Latin America introduced a basic rating program in 2010 followed by ASEAN NCAP in Southeast Asia in 2011, and Global NCAP is rating vehicles sold in significant emerging markets. Several countries, e.g., Malaysia and Thailand, are increasingly adopting the UN Regulations regarding vehicle safety under the UN 1958 agreement, and Malaysia started a world first motorcycle safety rating program in 2021. The United States upgraded its vehicle rating program, US NCAP, in 2010, which now is in the process of being updated by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Europe upgraded the Euro NCAP rating system during 2018, and is now completing a new upgrade, intended to be fully implemented by 2025. Japan and South Korea are continuously upgrading their respective vehicle rating programs, JNCAP and KNCAP respectively. India requires frontal airbags for the driver from July 2019, and passenger airbags from 2021 for all new passenger vehicles (M1), moreover has announced that side airbags shall become mandatory in 2023. In addition, India has announced that its Bharat NCAP shall start in 2023. 43 Vehicles with automated driving systems (ADS) are expected to provide additional opportunities through integration of protective safety systems with ADAS technologies, as well as new vehicle interior layouts and seating configurations. This development is likely to become subject to legal requirements. There are also other plans for improved automotive safety through new or changed regulations, both in these countries and others that could affect the Company’s market. However, there can be no assurance that changes in regulations will not adversely affect the demand for the Company’s products or, at least, result in a slower increase in the demand for them. DEPENDENCE ON CUSTOMERS As a result of this highly consolidated market, the Company is dependent on a relatively small number of customers with strong purchasing power. In 2023, the five largest vehicle manufacturers accounted for around 46% of global LVP and the ten largest manufacturers accounted for around 66% of global LVP. In 2023, the Company’s five largest customers accounted for around 48% of consolidated sales and the ten largest customers accounted for around 78% of consolidated sales. The Company's largest customer contract accounted for around 3% of consolidated sales in 2023. Customer Renault/Nissan/Mitsubishi Stellantis VW Honda Toyota Hyundai Ford General Motors Major EV maker Mercedes 1) Source: S&P Global % of Autoliv sales % of Global LVP1) 10% 10% 9% 9% 9% 7% 7% 6% 5% 4% 8% 7% 10% 5% 13% 8% 4% 5% 2% 3% Although business with every major customer is split into at least several contracts (usually one contract per vehicle platform) and although the customer base has become more balanced and diversified as a result of the Company's significant expansion in China and other rapidly-growing markets, the loss of all business from a major customer (whether by a cancellation of existing contracts or not awarding Autoliv new business), the consolidation of one or more major customers or a bankruptcy of a major customer could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, a quality issue, shortcomings in the Company's service to a customer or uncompetitive prices or products could result in the customer not awarding the Company new business, which will gradually have a negative impact on the Company's sales when current contracts start to expire. See also Note 19, Segment Information, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. 44 CUSTOMER PAYMENT RISK Another risk related to the Company's customers is the risk that one or more of its customers will be unable to pay their invoices that become due. The Company seeks to limit this customer payment risk by invoicing its major customers through their local subsidiaries in each country, even for global contracts. By invoicing this way, the Company attempts to avoid having the receivables with a multinational customer group exposed to the risk that a bankruptcy or similar event in one country would put all receivables with such customer group at risk. In each country, the Company also monitors invoices becoming overdue. Even so, if a major customer is unable to fulfill its payment obligations, it is likely that the Company would be forced to record a substantial loss on such receivables. DEPENDENCE ON SUPPLIERS The Company relies on internal and/or external suppliers in order to meet its delivery commitments to the customers. In some cases, suppliers are dictated by the customers. The Company's supply chain organization continually reviews sourcing risks and actively works on mitigating related supply chain risks. The Company’s ambition is to maintain an optimal number of suppliers in all significant component technologies. NEW COMPETITION Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced margins and the Company's inability to gain or hold market share. OEMs rigorously evaluate suppliers on the basis of product quality, price, reliability and delivery as well as engineering capabilities, technical expertise, product innovation, financial viability, application of lean principles, operational flexibility, customer service, and overall management. To maintain the Company's competitiveness and position as a market leader, it is important to focus on all these aspects of supplier evaluation and selection. Although the market for occupant restraint systems has undergone a significant consolidation during the past ten years, the passive safety market remains very competitive. It cannot be excluded that additional competitors, both global and local, will seek to enter the market or grow beyond their current Keiretsu group or traditional customer base. Particularly in China, South Korea, and Japan there are numerous small domestic competitors often supplying just one OEM group. PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY The Company’s strategy is to protect its innovations with patents, and to vigorously protect and defend its patents, trademarks, and know- how against infringement and unauthorized use. At the end of 2023, the Company held more than 6,500 patents and patents applications. These patents expire on various dates during the period from 2024 to 2043 The expiration of any single patent is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial results. Although the Company believes that its products and technology do not infringe upon the proprietary rights of others, there can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against the Company in the future. Also, there can be no assurance that any patent now owned by the Company will afford protection against competitors that develop similar technology. As the Company continues to expand its products and expand into new businesses, it will increase its exposure to intellectual property claims. Financial Risks The Company is exposed to financial risks through its operations. To reduce the financial risks and to take advantage of economies of scale, the Company has a central treasury department supporting operations and management. The treasury department handles external financial transactions and functions as the Company’s in-house bank for its subsidiaries. The Board of Directors monitors compliance with the financial risk policy on an on-going basis. For information about specific financial risks, see Item 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. 45 Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS The Company has considered all applicable recently issued accounting standards. The Company has summarized in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements each of the recently issued accounting standards and stated the impact or whether management is continuing to assess the impact. APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. Senior management has discussed the development and selection of critical accounting estimates and disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The application of accounting policies necessarily requires judgments and the use of estimates by a Company’s management. Actual results could differ from these estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on the Company's historical experience, terms of existing contracts, and management’s evaluation of trends in the industry, information provided by the Company's customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. The Company considers an accounting estimate to be critical if: • • It requires management to make assumptions about matters that were uncertain at the time of the estimate, and Changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected would have had a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. The accounting estimates that require management’s most significant judgments include the estimation of variable considerations, assessment of recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets, estimation of pension benefit obligations based on actuarial assumptions, estimation of accruals for warranty and recalls, restructuring charges, uncertain tax positions, valuation allowances and legal proceedings. The Company has summarized its critical accounting policies requiring judgment below. These might change over time based on the current facts and circumstances. REVENUE RECOGNITION In accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, revenue is measured based on consideration specified in a contract with a customer, adjusted for any variable consideration (i.e., price concessions) and estimated at contract inception. The estimated amount of variable consideration that will be received by the Company are based on historical experience and trends, management´s understanding of the status of negotiations with customers and anticipated future pricing strategies. The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product to a customer. In addition, from time to time, the Company may make payments to customers in connection with ongoing and future business. These payments to customers are generally recognized as a reduction to revenue at the time of the commitment to make these payments unless the payment concession can be clearly linked to the future business award. If the payments are capitalized, the amounts are amortized to revenue as the related goods are transferred. INVENTORY RESERVES Inventories are evaluated based on individual or, in some cases, groups of inventory items. Reserves are established to reduce the value of inventories to the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Excess inventories are quantities of items that exceed anticipated sales or usage for a reasonable period. The Company has guidelines for calculating provisions for excess inventories based on the number of months of inventories on hand compared to anticipated sales or usage. Management uses its judgment to forecast sales or usage and to determine what constitutes a reasonable period. There can be no assurance that the amount ultimately realized for inventories will not be materially different than that assumed in the calculation of the reserves. GOODWILL The Company performs an annual impairment test of goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year following the Company’s annual forecasting process. As of October 2023, the Company concluded that there were no impairments of goodwill. For further information, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 46 RECALL PROVISIONS AND WARRANTY OBLIGATIONS The Company records liabilities for product recalls when probable claims are identified and when it is possible to reasonably estimate costs. Recall costs are costs incurred when the customer decides to formally recall a product due to a known or suspected safety concern. Product recall costs are estimated based on the expected cost of replacing the product and the customer´s cost of carrying out the recall, which is affected by the number of vehicles subject to recall and the cost of labor and materials to remove and replace the defective product. The Company maintains a program of insurance, which may include commercial insurance, self-insurance, or a combination of both approaches, for potential recall and product liability claims in amounts and on terms that it believes are reasonable and prudent based on our prior claims experience. The Company’s insurance policies generally include coverage of the costs of a recall, although costs related to replacement parts are generally not covered. Actual costs incurred could differ from the amounts estimated, requiring adjustments to these reserves in future periods. It is possible that changes in our assumptions or future product recall issues could materially affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Estimating warranty obligations requires the Company to forecast the resolution of existing claims and expected future claims on products sold. The Company bases the estimate on historical trends of units sold and payment amounts, combined with our current understanding of the status of existing claims and discussions with our customers. These estimates are re-evaluated on an ongoing basis. Actual warranty obligations could differ from the amounts estimated requiring adjustments to existing reserves in future periods. Due to the uncertainty and potential volatility of the factors contributing to developing these estimates, changes in our assumptions could materially affect our results of operations. RESTRUCTURING PROVISIONS The Company defines restructuring expense to include costs directly associated with capacity alignment programs, plus exit or disposal activities. Estimates of restructuring charges are based on information available at the time such charges are recorded. In general, management anticipates that restructuring activities will be completed within a time frame such that significant changes to the exit plan are not likely. Due to inherent uncertainty involved in estimating restructuring expenses, actual amounts paid for such activities may differ from amounts initially estimated. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS The Company has defined benefit pension plans in thirteen countries. The most significant plans exist in the U.S. These U.S. plans represent approximately 51% of the Company’s total pension benefit obligation. See Note 18, Retirement Plans to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. The Company, in consultation with its actuarial advisors, determines certain key assumptions to be used in calculating the projected benefit obligation and annual pension expense. For the U.S. plans, the assumptions used for calculating the 2023 pension expense were a discount rate of 5.41% and an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 5.05%. The assumptions used in calculating the U.S. benefit obligations disclosed, as of December 31, 2023 were a discount rate of 5.13%. The discount rate for the U.S. plans has been set based on the rates of return of high-quality fixed-income investments currently available at the measurement date and are expected to be available during the period the benefits will be paid. The expected rate of long-term return on plan assets are determined based on several factors and must consider long-term expectations and reflect the financial environment in the respective local markets. At December 31, 2023, 31% of the U.S. plan assets were invested in equities, which is close to the target of 32%. The table below illustrates the sensitivity of the U.S. net periodic benefit cost and projected U.S. benefit obligation to a 1pp change in the discount rate and decrease in return on plan assets for the U.S. plans (in millions). The use of actuarial assumptions is an area of management’s estimate. Assumption (in millions) Discount rate Discount rate Return on plan assets 2023 net periodic benefit cost increase (decrease) 2023 projected benefit obligation increase (decrease) $ 1 (1) 2 (17) 20 n/a Change 1pp increase 1pp decrease 1pp decrease $ 47 INCOME TAXES Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Many of these uncertainties arise because of intercompany transactions. Although the Company believes that its tax return positions are supportable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be materially different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material effect on the income tax provisions or benefits in the periods in which such determinations are made. See also the discussion of reserves for uncertain tax positions, and the determinations of valuation allowances on the Company's deferred tax assets in Note 5, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Various claims, lawsuits and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries, covering a range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities with respect to commercial, product liability or other matters. The Company diligently defends itself in such matters and, in addition, carries insurance coverage to the extent reasonably available against insurable risks. The Company records liabilities for claims, lawsuits and proceedings when they are probable and it is possible to reasonably estimate the cost of such liabilities. Legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with a loss contingency are expensed as such costs are incurred. A loss contingency is accrued by a charge to income if it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss should be accrued management evaluates, among other factors, the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. Changes in these factors could materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements. 48 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk The Company is exposed to several markets risks in the ordinary course of business including risks related to currencies, interest rates, financing, capital structure and credit ratings and impairment. See also Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements included with this Annual Report for information about how these risks are quantified. CURRENCY RISKS 1. Transaction Exposure and Revaluation effects Transaction exposure arises because the cost of a product originates in one currency and the product is sold in another currency. Revaluation effects come from valuation of assets and liabilities denominated in other currencies than the reporting currency of each unit. The Company's net transaction exposure in 2023 was approximately $1.8 billion. The four largest net exposures are U.S. dollars (sell) against the Mexican Peso, Romanian Lei (buy) against the Euro, U.S. dollars (buy) against Korean Won and U.S. dollars (buy) against Japanese Yen. Together these currencies accounted for approximately 50% of the Company’s net currency transaction exposure. Since the Company can only effectively hedge these currency flows in the short term, periodic hedging would only reduce the impact of fluctuations temporarily. Over time, periodic hedging would postpone but not reduce the impact of fluctuations. In addition, the net exposure is limited to only around one quarter of net sales and is made up of around 50 different currency pairs with exposures of more than $1 million each. The Company generally does not hedge these flows. 2. Translation Exposure in the Income Statement and Balance Sheet Another effect of exchange rate fluctuations arises when the income statements of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars. Outside the U.S., the Company’s most significant currency is the Euro. The Company estimates that 28% of its consolidated net sales will be denominated in Euro or other European currencies during 2024, while 19% of its consolidated net sales are estimated to be denominated in U.S. dollars. The Company estimates that a 1% increase in the value of the U.S. dollar versus European currencies will decrease reported U.S. dollar annual net sales in 2024 by $31 million, while operating income for 2024 will decline by $3 million, assuming reported corporate average margin. The Company’s policy is not to hedge this type of translation exposure. A translation exposure also arises when the balance sheets of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars. The policy of the Company is to finance major subsidiaries in the country’s local currency and to minimize the amounts held by subsidiaries in foreign currency accounts. Consequently, changes in currency rates relating to funding and foreign currency accounts normally have a small impact on the Company’s income. In 2023 and 2022, the impact from the Company’s currency exposure were not material. INTEREST RATE RISK Interest rate risk refers to the risk that interest rate changes will affect the Company’s borrowing costs. The Company's interest rate risk policy states that the average interest rate fixing period should be minimum 1 year and maximum 5 years. At December 31, 2023, the average interest rate fixing period for the Company’s outstanding debt was 2.1 years, and at December 31, 2022, the average interest rate fixing period for the Company’s outstanding debt was 1.6 years. Given the Company’s current capital structure, we estimate that a one-percentage point interest rate increase would decrease net interest expense by approximately $0.4 million on an annual basis. This is based on the capital structure at the end of 2023 when the gross fixed- rate debt was $1,024 million while the Company had a net debt position of $1,367 million (see section Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures). Thus, a change in the interest rate environment would not have a notable impact on the Company’s interest expense. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had $498 million in cash and cash equivalents of which the majority were subject to a floating interest rate. Taking the cash and cash equivalents of $498 million (which is primarily subject to floating interest rates) minus the portion of debt carrying floating interest rates, we estimated that a one-percentage point interest rate increase would decrease net interest expense by approximately $0.4 million on an annual basis. Fixed interest rate debt can be achieved both by issuing fixed rate notes and through interest rate swaps. The most notable debt carrying fixed interest rates is the €500 million bond issued in 2023, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. 49 FINANCING RISK Financing risk refers to the risk that it will be difficult and/or expensive to finance new or existing debt to meet the financing needs of the Autoliv Group. The management of the financing risk ensures access to funding in a cost-efficient way by diversification of funding sources and debt maturities. Autoliv has diversified its long-term funding sources by issuing notes in the USPP and Eurobond markets, and by signing a long-term credit agreement with 11 banks. The Company also has a lending facility with the Swedish Export Credit Corporation. The Company has a Medium Term Note Program in place for being able to issue notes to be traded on the Global Exchange Market of Euronext Dublin. The Company also has established programs for short-term issuance of commercial papers in the Swedish and US markets and short-term credit agreements, e.g., bank overdrafts and money market loans. To ensure diversification of debt maturities no more than 20% of the Autoliv Group’s total debt may mature the next 12 months, unless such maturities (in excess of 20%) are covered by unutilized committed credit facilities with maturity in excess of 12 months. Per December 31, 2023, 29% corresponding to $538 million of the Autoliv Group’s total debt had maturity less than 12 months. This amount was fully covered by unutilized committed credit facilities with maturity in excess of 12 months. CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND CREDIT RATING The overall objective relating to Autoliv’s target capital structure and credit rating is to provide the Company with sufficient flexibility to manage the inherent risks and cyclicality in Autoliv’s business and allow the Company to realize strategic opportunities and fund growth initiatives while creating shareholder value. Autoliv is committed to maintain a “strong investment grade credit rating." As of December 31, 2023, the Company had a long-term credit rating from S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) of BBB. The amount of interest-bearing debt held impacts the future financial flexibility as well as the credit rating. Management uses the non- U.S. GAAP measure “Leverage Ratio” to analyze the amount of debt the Company can incur under its debt policy. Management believes that this policy also provides guidance to credit and equity investors regarding the extent to which the Company would be prepared to leverage its operations. Autoliv’s long-term target for the leverage ratio (sum of net debt plus pension liabilities divided by EBITDA) is 1.0x with the aim to operate within the range of 0.5x to 1.5x. At December 31, 2023, the leverage ratio (non-U.S. GAAP measure, see calculation table below) was 1.2x. For details and calculation of leverage ratio, refer to the table below. CALCULATION OF LEVERAGE RATIO (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) Net debt1) Pension liabilities Debt per the Policy Net income2) Income taxes2) Interest expense, net2,3) Other non-operating items, net2) Income from equity method investments2) Depreciation and amortization of intangibles2) Capacity alignments costs and antitrust related matters2) EBITDA per the Policy (Adjusted EBITDA) Leverage ratio $ $ December 31, 2023 2022 1,367 159 1,527 489 123 80 3 (5) 378 230 1,297 1.2 $ $ 1,184 154 1,338 425 178 54 5 (3) 363 (61) 961 1.4 1) Net debt is short- and long-term debt and debt-related derivatives less cash and cash equivalents (non-U.S. GAAP measure). 2) Latest 12 months. 3) Interest expense, net is interest expense including cost for extinguishment of debt, if any, less interest income. 50 CREDIT RISK IN FINANCIAL MARKETS Credit risk refers to the risk of a financial counterparty being unable to fulfill an agreed-upon obligation. In the Company’s financial operations, credit risk arises when cash is deposited with banks and when entering into forward exchange agreements, swap contracts or other financial instruments. The policy of the Company is to work with banks that have a high credit rating and that participate in Autoliv’s financing. To further reduce credit risk, deposits and financial instruments can only be entered into with core banks up to a calculated risk amount of $200 million per bank for banks rated A- or above and up to $50 million for banks rated BBB+. In addition, deposits can be made in U.S. and Swedish government short-term notes and certain AAA rated money market funds, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. At December 31, 2023, the Company held $290 million in AAA rated money market funds. IMPAIRMENT RISK Impairment risk refers to the risk that the Company will write down a material amount of its goodwill of close to $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2023. This risk is assessed at least annually in the fourth quarter each year when the Company performs its impairment testing. In 2023, the Company performed a quantitative impairment testing by calculating the fair value of its goodwill. The estimated fair market value of goodwill is determined by the discounted cash flow method. The Company discounts projected operating cash flows using its weighted average cost of capital. Estimating the fair value requires the Company to make judgments about appropriate discount rates, growth rates, relevant comparable company earnings multiples and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. It has been concluded that presently the Company's goodwill is not “at risk”. However, there can be no assurance that goodwill will not be impaired due to future significant declines in LVP, due to the Company's technologies or products becoming obsolete or for any other reason. The Company could also acquire companies where goodwill could turn out to be less resilient to deteriorations in external conditions. See also discussion under Goodwill and Intangible Assets in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 10, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data The Consolidated Balance Sheets of Autoliv as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 and the Consolidated Statements of Income, Comprehensive Income, Cash Flows and Total Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and the Reports of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are included below. All of the schedules specified under Regulation S-X to be provided by Autoliv have been omitted either because they are not applicable, are not required or the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto. 51 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Autoliv, Inc. Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Autoliv, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, total equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 20, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Critical Audit Matters The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate. Description of the Matter Revenue recognition – Variable consideration related to price concessions As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company measures revenue based on consideration specified in a contract with a customer, adjusted for any variable consideration. Variability in consideration typically results from price concessions. The estimated variable consideration that will be received by the Company related to price concessions is based on assumptions that include historical experience and trends, management’s assessment of the probable outcome of its negotiations with customers and anticipated future pricing strategies. Estimating variable consideration to be received related to price concessions requires significant judgments by management that affect the amount of revenue recorded in the financial statements. Auditing the amount of variable consideration expected to be received related to price concessions was complex because of the uncertainty inherent in the factors discussed above that management uses in its assumptions and calculations. How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of internal controls related to variable consideration. To test the estimated variable consideration expected to be received related to price concessions, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the Company’s estimation methodology and testing the significant factors used in the calculations, as discussed above. These procedures included obtaining information from management and sales department representatives who were responsible for negotiations with customers to assess the reasonableness of assumptions related to variable considerations relative to current negotiations. We also performed journal entry testing focused on unusual and manual entries affecting revenue. 52 Description of the Matter How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit Product recall liabilities As discussed in Notes 2 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is exposed to product liability claims in the event its products fail to perform as represented and such failure results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury, and/or property damage or other loss. The Company records liabilities for product recalls when probable claims are identified and when it is possible to reasonably estimate costs. Actual costs incurred could differ from the amounts estimated, requiring adjustments to these reserves in future periods. Provisions for product recalls are estimated based on the expected cost of replacing the product and the customer’s cost of carrying out the recall, which is affected by the number of vehicles subject to recall and the cost of labor and materials to remove and replace the defective product. Auditing the product recall liabilities was complex due to the uncertainty inherent in the assumptions and estimates management uses to calculate these liability balances. These significant assumptions and estimates include the nature, likelihood, timing, and anticipated cost of known and potential claims. We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of internal controls over the Company’s product recall liabilities process. To test product recall liabilities, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the Company’s estimation methodology and testing the significant assumptions. We obtained information from Company personnel who are responsible for monitoring the status of product recalls with customers to assess the reasonableness of assumptions used. We evaluated the Company’s ability to estimate by comparing actual results to previous estimates and judgments made by management. We also obtained letters from the Company’s external legal counsel addressing material claims against the Company, if any, and examined relevant third-party automotive safety regulatory information to identify potential unrecorded product recall liabilities. /s/ Ernst & Young AB We have served as the Company´s auditor since 1984. Stockholm, Sweden February 20, 2024 53 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Autoliv, Inc. Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited Autoliv, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Autoliv, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, total equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes and our report dated February 20, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ Ernst & Young AB Stockholm, Sweden February 20, 2024 54 Consolidated Statements of Income (DOLLARS AND SHARES IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Selling, general and administrative expenses Research, development and engineering expenses, net Amortization of intangibles Other income (expense), net Operating income Income from equity method investment Interest income Interest expense Other non-operating items, net Income before income taxes Income tax expense Net income Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest Net income attributable to controlling interest Earnings per share - basic Earnings per share - diluted Weighted average number of shares outstanding, net of treasury shares (in millions) Weighted average number of shares outstanding, assuming dilution and net of treasury shares (in millions) Cash dividend per share - declared Cash dividend per share - paid See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Note 19 $ Note 10 Notes 11, 17 Note 8 Note 13 Note 5 $ $ $ $ $ Years ended December 31 2022 2021 2023 10,475 (8,654) 1,822 (498) (425) (2) (207) 690 5 13 (93) (3) 612 (123) 489 1 488 5.74 5.72 85.0 85.2 2.66 2.66 $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,842 (7,446) 1,396 (437) (390) (3) 93 659 3 6 (60) (5) 603 (178) 425 2 423 4.86 4.85 87.1 87.2 2.58 2.58 $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,230 (6,719) 1,511 (432) (391) (10) (3) 675 3 4 (60) (7) 614 (177) 437 2 435 4.97 4.96 87.5 87.7 1.88 1.88 55 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) Net income Other comprehensive income (loss)before tax: Change in cumulative translation adjustments Net change in unrealized components of defined benefit plans Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax Tax effect allocated to other comprehensive income (loss) Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax Comprehensive income Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Years ended December 31 2022 2021 2023 $ 489 $ 425 $ 20 7 27 (1) 25 514 1 513 $ (136) 29 (107) (9) (116) 309 0 309 $ $ 437 (86) 37 (49) (11) (60) 377 2 375 56 Consolidated Balance Sheets (DOLLARS AND SHARES IN MILLIONS) Assets Cash and cash equivalents Receivables, net Inventories, net Income tax receivable Prepaid expenses and accrued income Other current assets Total current assets Property, plant and equipment, net Operating lease right-of-use assets Goodwill and intangible assets, net Other non-current assets Total non-current assets Total assets Liabilities and equity Short-term debt Accounts payable Accrued expenses Income tax payable Operating lease liabilities, current Other current liabilities Total current liabilities Long-term debt Pension liability Operating lease liabilities, non-current Other non-current liabilities Total non-current liabilities Commitments and contingencies Common stock1) Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Treasury stock (4.9 and 5.0 million shares, respectively) Total controlling interest’s equity Non-controlling interest Total equity Total liabilities and equity At December 31 2023 2022 498 2,198 1,012 60 173 33 3,974 2,192 176 1,385 606 4,358 8,332 538 1,978 1,135 122 39 223 4,035 1,324 159 135 109 1,728 88 1,044 2,289 (496) (368) 2,557 13 2,570 8,332 $ $ 594 1,907 969 55 160 29 3,714 1,960 160 1,382 502 4,003 7,717 711 1,693 915 75 39 207 3,642 1,054 154 119 121 1,450 91 1,113 2,310 (522) (379) 2,613 13 2,626 7,717 $ Note 6 Note 7 Note 12, 17 Note 9 Note 3 Note 10 Note 8, 17 Note 13 Notes 11, 12 Note 3 Note 13 Note 18 Note 3 Note 17 Note 14 $ 1) Number of shares: 350 million authorized for both years, 87.5 and 91.2 million issued, and 82.6 and 86.2 million outstanding, net of treasury shares, for 2023 and 2022, respectively. See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 57 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) Operating activities Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Gain on divestiture of property Deferred income taxes Undistributed earnings from equity method investments, net of dividends Other, net Net change in operating working capital: Receivables and other assets, gross Inventories, gross Accounts payable and accrued expenses Income taxes Net cash provided by operating activities Investing activities Expenditures for property, plant and equipment Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment Net cash used in investing activities Financing activities Net increase (decrease) in other short-term debt Proceeds from long-term debt Repayment of long-term debt Dividends paid Stock repurchases Common stock options exercised Dividends paid to non-controlling interest Net cash used in financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents Decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Years ended December 31 2022 2021 2023 $ 489 $ 425 $ 378 — (109) (1) (10) (213) (22) 426 43 982 (573) 4 (569) 61 559 (533) (225) (352) 1 (1) (490) (20) (96) 594 498 $ 363 (80) (40) (1) (13) (297) (243) 596 2 713 (585) 101 (485) 167 — (357) (224) (115) 0 (2) (531) (73) (375) 969 594 $ $ 437 394 — (20) (3) 8 283 (19) (314) (12) 754 (458) 4 (454) (11) — (295) (165) — 3 (1) (469) (39) (209) 1,178 969 58 Consolidated Statements of Total Equity Number of shares Common stock Additional paid in capital Retained earnings 103 $ 103 $ 1,329 $ 2,471 435 (165) Accumulated other com- prehensive (loss) income1) (347) $ (87) 26 435 (87) 26 375 15 (165) 15 Treasury stock Total parent shareholders’ equity Non- controlling interest Total equity $ (1,147) $ 2,409 $ 14 $ 2,423 103 $ 103 $ 1,329 $ 2,742 $ (408) $ (1,133) $ 2,633 $ (11) (11) (216) 423 (631) (224) (134) 20 744 10 423 (134) 20 309 (115) 10 (224) 91 $ 91 $ 1,113 $ 2,310 $ (522) $ (379) $ 2,613 $ (4) (4) (70) 488 (282) (225) 20 6 11 488 20 6 513 (356) 11 (225) 88 $ 88 $ 1,044 $ 2,289 $ (496) $ (368) $ 2,557 $ 2 0 2 (1) 15 2 (1) 0 (2) 13 1 (0) 1 437 (86) 26 377 15 (165) (1) 2,648 $ 425 (136) 20 309 (115) 10 (224) (2) 2,626 $ 489 20 6 514 (356) 11 (225) (1) 13 $ (1) 2,570 (DOLLARS AND SHARES IN MILLIONS) Balance at December 31, 2020 Comprehensive Income: Net income Foreign currency translation Pension liability Total Comprehensive Income Stock-based compensation Cash dividends declared Dividends paid to non-controlling interest on subsidiary shares Balance at December 31, 2021 Comprehensive Income: Net income Foreign currency translation Pension liability Total Comprehensive Income Retired and repurchased shares Stock-based compensation Cash dividends declared Dividends paid to non-controlling interest on subsidiary shares Balance at December 31, 2022 Comprehensive Income: Net income Foreign currency translation Pension liability Total Comprehensive Income Retired and repurchased shares Stock-based compensation Cash dividends declared Dividends paid to non-controlling interest on subsidiary shares Balance at December 31, 2023 1) See Note 14 for further details – includes tax effects where applicable. See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 59 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 1. Basis of Presentation NATURE OF OPERATIONS Through its operating subsidiaries, the Company is a leading developer, manufacturer and supplier of passive safety systems to the automotive industry with a broad range of product offerings. Passive safety systems are primarily meant to improve safety for occupants in a vehicle. Passive safety systems include modules and components for frontal-impact airbag protection systems, side-impact airbag protection systems, seatbelts, steering wheels and inflator technologies. The Company also develops and manufactures mobility safety solutions such as pedestrian protection, battery cut-off switches, connected safety services, and safety solutions for riders of powered two wheelers. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States (U.S.) Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and include Autoliv, Inc. and all companies over which Autoliv, Inc. directly or indirectly exercises control, which as a general rule means that the Company owns more than 50% of the voting rights. Consolidation is also required when the Company has both the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity (VIE) and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. All intercompany accounts and transactions within the Company have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements. Investments in affiliated companies in which the Company exercises significant influence over the operations and financial policies, but does not control, are reported using the equity method of accounting. Generally, the Company owns between 20-50% of such investments. SEGMENT REPORTING In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting, the operating segments are determined based on the information provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) on a regular basis and used for the purpose of assessing performance and allocating resources within the Company. The CEO is deemed to be the CODM of Autoliv since he is the person who makes all major decisions on how to allocate the resources and assess the performance of the Company for both strategic and operational initiatives. ASC 280 indicates that a component is an operating segment if it meets the following criteria: • • • It engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses. Its operating results are regularly reviewed by the CODM to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance. Its discrete financial information is available. The Company as a whole has met the definition of an operating segment as it engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, the consolidated operating results are regularly reviewed by the CEO/CODM to allocate resources and assess performance, and discrete financial information is available. Additionally, as Autoliv supplies customers on a global basis it also manages the business on a global basis. Therefore, based on the above analysis, the Company has concluded that the Company is the single operating and reportable segment under ASC 280, Segment Reporting. For more information on the Company's segment, see Note 19. RECLASSIFICATIONS AND ROUNDINGS Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements and associated notes may not reconcile due to rounding. All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts. 60 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENT Investments accounted for under the equity method, means that a proportional share of the equity method investment’s net income increases the investment, and a proportional share of losses and payment of dividends decreases it. In the Consolidated Statements of Income, the proportional share of the net income (loss) is reported as Income from equity method investment. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. The accounting estimates that require management’s most significant judgments include the estimation of variable consideration for the Company's contracts with customers, valuation of stock-based compensation payments, assessment of recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets, estimation of pension benefit obligations based on actuarial assumptions, estimation of accruals for warranty and recalls, restructuring charges, uncertain tax positions, valuation allowances and legal proceedings. Actual results could differ from those estimates. REVENUE RECOGNITION In accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, revenue is measured based on consideration specified in a contract with a customer, adjusted for any variable consideration (i.e., price concessions) and estimated at contract inception. The estimated amount of variable consideration that will be received by the Company is based on historical experience and trends, management´s understanding of the status of negotiations with customers and anticipated future pricing strategies. The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product to a customer. In addition, from time to time, the Company may make payments to or receive additional consideration from customers in connection with ongoing and future business. These payments to or cash receipts from customers are generally recognized to revenue at the time of the commitment unless the payments to customers can be clearly linked to the future business. If the payments to customers are capitalized, the amounts are amortized to revenue as the related goods are transferred. Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by the Company from a customer, are excluded from revenue. Shipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight before control of a product has transferred to a customer are accounted for as a fulfillment cost and are included in cost of sales. Nature of goods and services The Company generates revenue from the sale of parts, which includes airbag and seatbelt products and components, to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). The Company accounts for individual products separately if they are distinct (i.e., if a product is separately identifiable from other items and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer). The consideration for each of the products, including any price concessions, is based on their stand-alone selling prices. The stand-alone selling prices are determined based on the cost-plus margin approach. The Company recognizes revenue for parts primarily at a point in time. For parts with revenue recognized at a point in time, the Company recognizes revenue upon shipment to the customers and transfer of title and risk of loss under standard commercial terms (typically FOB shipping point). There are certain contracts where the criteria to recognize revenue over time have been met (e.g., there is no alternative use to the Company and the Company has an enforceable right to payment). In such cases, at period end, the Company recognizes revenue and a related asset and associated cost of goods sold and reduction in inventory. However, the financial impact of these contracts is immaterial considering the very short production cycles and limited inventory days on hand. The contract balances with customers, included in other current assets, amounted to $20 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. The amount of revenue recognized is based on the purchase order price and adjusted for variable consideration (i.e., price concessions). Customers typically pay for the parts based on customary business practices. GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE The Company’s operations are impacted by various government incentives, grants, programs, rebates, and other arrangements. Government assistance received is recorded in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with their purpose, either as a reduction of expense or an offset to the related capital asset. The benefit is recorded when all performance obligations attached to the assistance have been met or are expected to be met and there is reasonable assurance of their receipt. Government assistance received by the Company is immaterial for all periods presented since the adoption of ASU 2021-10. 61 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING, NET (R,D & E) Research and development and most engineering expenses are expensed as incurred. These expenses are reported net of expense reimbursements from contracts to perform engineering design and product development fulfillment activities related to the production of parts. For the years 2023, 2022 and 2021 total reimbursements from customers were $192 million, $204 million and $205 million, respectively. Certain engineering expenses related to long-term supply arrangements are capitalized when defined criteria, such as the existence of a contractual guarantee for reimbursement, are met. The aggregate amount of such assets is not significant in any period presented. Tooling is generally agreed upon as a separate contract or a separate component of an engineering contract, as a pre-production project. Capitalization of tooling costs is made only when the specific criteria for capitalization of customer funded tooling is met or the criteria for capitalization as Property, Plant & Equipment (P,P&E) for tools owned by the Company are fulfilled. Depreciation on the Company’s own tooling is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Cost of sales. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The compensation costs for all of the Company’s stock-based compensation awards are determined based on the fair value method as defined in ASC 718, Compensation –Stock Compensation. The Company records the compensation expense for awards under the Stock Incentive Plan, including Restricted Stock Units (RSUs), Performance Shares (PSUs) and stock options (SOs), over the respective vesting period. For further details, see Note 16. INCOME TAXES Current tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the estimated taxes payable or refundable on the tax returns for the current year. In certain circumstances, payments or refunds may extend beyond twelve months, in such cases amounts would be classified as non- current taxes payable or receivable. Deferred tax liabilities or assets are recognized for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards that result from events that have been recognized in either the financial statements or the tax returns, but not both. The measurement of current and deferred tax liabilities and assets is based on provisions of enacted tax laws. Deferred tax assets are reduced by the amount of any tax benefits that are not expected to be realized. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Evaluation of the realizability of deferred tax assets is subject to significant judgment requiring careful consideration of all facts and circumstances. The Company classifies deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Tax assets and liabilities are not offset unless attributable to the same tax jurisdiction and netting is possible according to law and, as it relates to payables and receivables, expected to take place in the same period. Tax benefits associated with tax positions taken in the Company’s income tax returns are initially recognized when it is more likely than not that those tax positions will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authorities. The Company’s evaluation of its tax benefits is based on the probability of the tax position being upheld if challenged by the taxing authorities (including through negotiation, appeals, settlement and litigation). Whenever a tax position does not meet the initial recognition criteria, the tax benefit is subsequently recognized if there is a substantive change in the facts and circumstances that cause a change in judgment concerning the sustainability of the tax position upon examination by the relevant taxing authorities. In cases where tax benefits meet the initial recognition criterion, the Company continues, in subsequent periods, to assess its ability to sustain those positions. A previously recognized tax benefit is derecognized when it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination. Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits are classified as non-current unless the payment of the liability is expected to be made within the next 12 months. 62 EARNINGS PER SHARE The Company calculates basic earnings per share (EPS) by dividing net income attributable to controlling interest by the weighted- average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period (net of treasury shares). The Company’s unvested RSUs and PSUs, of which some include the right to receive non-forfeitable dividend equivalents, are considered participating securities. The diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if common stock was issued for awards under the Stock Incentive Plan and is calculated using the treasury stock method. The treasury stock method assumes that the Company uses the proceeds from the exercise of stock option awards to repurchase ordinary shares at the average market price during the period. For unvested restricted stock, assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method will include unamortized compensation cost and windfall tax benefits or shortfalls. For further details, see Notes 16 and 20. CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all highly liquid investment instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. RECEIVABLES AND ALLOWANCE FOR EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES In addition to individually assess overdue customer balances for expected credit losses, the Company also calculates an allowance that reflects the expected credit losses on receivables considering both historical experience as well as forward looking assumptions. The method calculates the expected credit loss for a group of customers by using the customer groups’ average short-term default rates based on officially published credit ratings and the Company’s historical experience. These default rates are considered the Company’s best estimate of the customer’s ability to pay. The Company regularly reassess the customer groups and the applied customer group’s default rates by using its best judgment when considering changes in customer’s credit ratings, customer’s historical payments and loss experience, current market and economic conditions and the Company’s expectations of future market and economic conditions. There can be no assurance that the amount ultimately realized for receivables will not be materially different than that assumed in the calculation of the allowance for expected credit losses. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES All derivatives are recognized at fair value. Hedge accounting is not applied either because non-hedge accounting treatment creates the same accounting result or the hedge does not meet the hedge accounting requirements, although entered into applying the same rationale concerning mitigating market risk that occurs from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates. For further details on the Company’s financial instruments, see Note 4. INVENTORIES The cost of inventories is computed according to the first-in first-out method (FIFO). Cost includes the cost of materials, direct labor and the applicable share of manufacturing overhead. Inventories are evaluated based on individual or, in some cases, groups of inventory items. Reserves are established to reduce the value of inventories to the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Excess inventories are quantities of items that exceed anticipated sales or usage for a reasonable period. The Company calculates provisions for excess inventories based on the number of months of inventories on hand compared to anticipated sales or usage. Management uses its judgment to forecast sales or usage and to determine what constitutes a reasonable period. There can be no assurance that the amount ultimately realized for inventories will not be materially different than that assumed in the calculation of the reserves. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Property, Plant and Equipment is recorded at historical cost. Construction in progress generally involves short-term projects for which capitalized interest is not significant. The Company provides for depreciation of property, plant and equipment computed under the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, or in the case of leasehold improvements over the shorter of the useful life or the lease term. Amortization on finance leases is recognized with depreciation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income over the shorter of the assets’ expected life or the lease contract term. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. 63 LEASES In accordance with ASC 842, Leases, the Company recognizes contracts that is, or contains, a lease when the contract conveys the right to control the use of a physically identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration in the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and lease liability. The Company recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at lease commencement. The lease liability for both finance and operating leases is measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted at the Company's incremental borrowing rate (if the implicit interest rate in the lease contract is not readily determinable). The right-of-use asset (ROU) for finance and operating leases is initially measured at the sum of the initial lease liability plus initial direct costs plus prepaid lease payments minus lease incentives received. Lease payments include undiscounted fixed payments plus optional payments that are reasonably certain to be owed. Lease payments do not include variable lease payments other than those that depend on an index or rate. Variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate are included in the calculation of lease payments and in the measurement of the lease liability. If the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate. The Company uses its best judgement when determining the incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term to the lease payments in a similar currency. The Company has elected the practical expedient of not separating lease components from non-lease components for all its classes of underlying assets. The Company has also elected to recognize the lease payments for short-term leases in its consolidated statement of income on a straight-line basis over the lease term and recognize the variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. Finance lease right-of-use assets are presented together with other property, plant and equipment assets and finance lease liabilities are presented together with other current and non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Finance leases were not material as of December 31, 2023. For further details on the Company’s leases, see Note 3. LONG-LIVED ASSET IMPAIRMENT The Company evaluates the carrying value and useful lives of long-lived assets, other than goodwill and intangible assets, when indications of impairment are evident or it is likely that the useful lives have decreased, in which case the Company depreciates the assets over the remaining useful lives. Impairment testing is primarily done by using the cash flow method based on undiscounted future cash flows. Estimated undiscounted cash flows for a long-lived asset being evaluated for recoverability are compared with the respective carrying amount of that asset. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying amount of the assets, the carrying amounts of the long-lived asset are considered recoverable and an impairment cannot be recorded. However, if the carrying amount of a group of assets exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an entity must then measure the long-lived assets’ fair value to determine whether an impairment loss should be recognized, generally using a discounted cash flow model. Generally, the lowest level of cash flows for impairment assessment is customer platform level. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but subject to at least an annual review for impairment. Other intangible assets, principally related to acquired technology, are amortized over their useful lives which range from 3 to 25 years. The Company performs its annual impairment testing in the fourth quarter of each year. Impairment testing is required more often than annually if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment, or decline in value, may have occurred. The Company uses either a qualitative assessment or a quantitative calculation for its impairment testing. The qualitative assessment permits the Company to assess whether it is more than likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of greater than 50%) that goodwill or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If the Company concludes based on the qualitative assessment that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, it would not have to quantitatively determine the asset’s fair value. The Company also consider external factors that could affect the significant inputs used to determine fair value. In 2023, the Company performed a quantitative impairment test by calculating the fair value of its goodwill. The estimated fair market value of goodwill is determined by the discounted cash flow method. The Company discounts projected operating cash flows using its weighted average cost of capital. Estimating the fair value requires the Company to make judgments about appropriate discount rates, growth rates, relevant comparable company earnings multiples and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the excess of carrying amount over the fair value of the respective reporting unit. To supplement this analysis, the Company compares the market value of its equity, calculated by reference to the quoted market prices of its shares, with the book value of its equity. There were no impairments of goodwill from 2021 through 2023. 64 WARRANTIES AND RECALLS The Company records liabilities for product recalls when probable claims are identified and when it is possible to reasonably estimate costs. Recall costs are costs incurred when the customer decides to formally recall a product due to a known or suspected safety concern. Product recall costs are estimated based on the expected cost of replacing the product and the customer´s cost of carrying out the recall, which is affected by the number of vehicles subject to recall and the cost of labor and materials to remove and replace the defective product. Insurance receivables, related to recall issues covered by the insurance, are included within other current and non-current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Provisions for warranty claims are estimated based on prior experience, likely changes in performance of newer products and the mix and volume of products sold. The provisions are recorded on an accrual basis. RESTRUCTURING PROVISIONS The Company defines restructuring expense to include costs directly associated with rightsizing, exit or disposal activities. Estimates of restructuring charges are based on information available at the time such charges are recorded. In general, management anticipates that restructuring activities will be completed within a timeframe such that significant changes to the exit plan are not likely. Due to inherent uncertainty involved in estimating restructuring expenses, actual amounts paid for such activities may differ from amounts initially estimated. PENSION OBLIGATIONS The Company provides for both defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans. A defined contribution plan generally specifies the periodic amount that the employer must contribute to the plan and how that amount will be allocated to the eligible employees who perform services during the same period. A defined benefit pension plan is one that contains pension benefit formulas, which generally determine the amount of pension benefits that each employee will receive for services performed during a specified period of employment. The amount recognized as a defined benefit liability is the net total of projected benefit obligation (PBO) minus the fair value of plan assets (if any) (see Note 18). CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Various claims, lawsuits and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries, covering a range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities with respect to commercial, product liability or other matters (see Note 12). The Company diligently defends itself in such matters and, in addition, carries insurance coverage to the extent reasonably available against insurable risks. The Company records liabilities for claims, lawsuits and proceedings, when they are probable and it is possible to reasonably estimate the cost of such liabilities. Legal costs expected to be incurred in connection with a loss contingency are expensed as such costs are incurred. The Company believes, based on currently available information, that the resolution of outstanding matters, other than any antitrust related matters described in Note 17 after taking into account recorded liabilities and available insurance coverage, should not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. However, due to the inherent uncertainty associated with such matters, there can be no assurance that the final outcomes of these matters will not be materially different than currently estimated. TRANSLATION OF NON-U.S. SUBSIDIARIES The assets and liabilities of subsidiaries with functional currency other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars based on the current exchange rate prevailing at each balance sheet date and any resulting translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries whose local currency is not their functional currency are remeasured from their local currency to their functional currency and then translated to U.S. dollars. Revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rates prevailing for each period presented. RECEIVABLES AND LIABILITIES IN NON-FUNCTIONAL CURRENCIES Receivables and liabilities not denominated in functional currencies are converted at year-end exchange rates. Net transaction losses, reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income, amounted to $(30) million in 2023, $(25) million in 2022 and $(29) million in 2021, and are recorded in operating income if they relate to operational receivables and liabilities or are recorded in other non-operating items, net if they relate to financial receivables and liabilities. 65 NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS Changes to U.S. GAAP are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in the form of accounting standards updates (“ASUs”) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have an immaterial impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Adoption of New Accounting Standards In September 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-04, Liabilities-Supplier Finance Programs (Subtopic 405-50), Disclosure of Supplier Finance Program Obligations, which requires that a buyer in a supplier finance program disclose sufficient information about the program to allow a user of financial statements to understand the program’s nature, activity during the period, changes from period to period and potential magnitude. During the fiscal year of adoption, the information on the key terms of the programs and the balance sheet presentation of the program obligations, which are annual disclosure requirements, should be disclosed in each interim period. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to each period in which a balance sheet is presented, except for the amendment on roll-forward information, which should be applied prospectively. The Company adopted ASU 2022-04 as of January 1, 2023. The Company has an agreement with an external payment service provider to facilitate the payments to certain suppliers. The outstanding obligations confirmed towards the external payment service provider are recorded in Accounts Payable in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet until payment has been effected. The Company has undertaken to make sure the payment is effected on the original invoice maturity date. The average payment terms during 2023 was 115 days. The roll-forward of the Company's outstanding obligations confirmed as valid under its supplier finance program for the year ended December 31, 2023 is as follows (dollars in millions): December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 As of Confirmed obligations outstanding at beginning of the period Invoices confirmed during the period Confirmed invoices paid during the period Confirmed obligations outstanding at end of the period1) 1) Amount of obligations confirmed under the program that remains unpaid by the Company is reported as Accounts Payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. 314 1,436 (1,405) 345 $ $ $ n/a n/a n/a 314 Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280), Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, which improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The amendments in this update require that a public entity make additional disclosures related to segments if it has them. A public entity that has a single reportable segment would be required to provide all the disclosures required by the amendments in this update and all existing segment disclosures in Topic 280. The amendments in this update are affective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2023-07 will have on its financial statements and will adopt the amendments in this update upon the effective date. In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures as well as improve the effectiveness of income tax disclosures. The amendments in this update require that public business entities on an annual basis (1) disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and (2) provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. The amendments in this update also require that all entities disclose on an annual basis certain detailed information about income taxes paid. The amendments in this update related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disclosures improve the transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring (1) consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and (2) income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. The amendments allow investors to better assess, in their capital allocation decisions, how an entity’s worldwide operations and related tax risks and tax planning and operational opportunities affect its income tax rate and prospects for future cash flows. The amendments in this update are affective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this update should be applied on a prospective basis. Retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2023-09 will have on its financial statements and will adopt the amendments in this update prospectively upon the effective date. 66 3. Leases The Company has operating leases for offices, manufacturing and research buildings, machinery, cars, data processing and other equipment. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of 1-44 years, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to 25 years, and some of which include options to terminate the leases within one year. As of December 31, 2023, the Company has no additional material operating leases that have not yet commenced. The following tables provide information about the Company’s operating leases. The Company has not identified any material finance leases as of December 31, 2023; therefore, the finance lease components have not been disclosed in the tables below. 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 54 8 5 (1) 66 $ $ 50 9 4 (1) 62 $ $ 44 10 4 (2) 56 Year ended or as of December 31, $ 2023 47 70 9.4 years $ 2022 42 74 9.7 years 3.2% 2.8% Maturities 40 33 24 19 13 77 206 (31) 175 $ $ Lease cost (Dollars in millions) Operating lease cost Short-term lease cost Variable lease cost Sublease income Total lease cost Other information (Dollars in millions) Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases Maturities of operating lease liabilities (undiscounted cash flows) are as follows: (Dollars in millions) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Thereafter Total operating lease payments Less imputed interest Total operating lease liabilities 67 4. Fair Value Measurements ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, other current liabilities and short-term debt approximate their fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company uses derivative financial instruments, “derivatives”, as part of its debt management to mitigate the market risk that occurs from its exposure to changes in interest and foreign exchange rates. The Company does not enter into derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes. The Company’s use of derivatives is in accordance with the strategies contained in the Company’s overall financial policy. All derivatives are recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. Certain derivatives are from time to time designated either as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges in line with the hedge accounting criteria. For certain other derivatives hedge accounting is not applied either because non-hedge accounting treatment creates the same accounting result or the hedge does not meet the hedge accounting requirements, although entered into applying the same rationale concerning mitigating market risk that occurs from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of the instruments generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Pricing observability is impacted by several factors, including the type of asset or liability, whether the asset or liability has an established market and the characteristics specific to the transaction. Instruments with readily active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of pricing observability and a lesser degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, assets rarely traded or not quoted will generally have less, or no, pricing observability and a higher degree of judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Under U.S. GAAP, there is a disclosure framework hierarchy associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels defined by the hierarchy are as follows: Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date. Level 2 - Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed. Level 3 - Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. The Company’s derivatives are all classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The tables below present information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. The carrying value is the same as the fair value as these instruments are recognized in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. Although the Company is party to close-out netting agreements (ISDA agreements) with all derivative counterparties, the fair values in the tables below and in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 have been presented on a gross basis. According to the close-out netting agreements, transaction amounts payable to a counterparty on the same date and in the same currency can be netted. The amounts subject to netting agreements that the Company choose not to offset are presented below. DERIVATIVES DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS There were no derivatives designated as hedging instruments as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. 68 DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, relate to economic hedges and are marked to market with all amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The derivatives not designated as hedging instruments outstanding at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 were foreign exchange swaps. For 2023, the Company recognized a gain of $2 million in other non-operating items, net for derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments. For 2022, the Company recognized a gain of $2 million. For 2021, the Company recognized a loss of $33 million. The realized part of the losses referred to above are reported under financing activities in the statement of cash flows. For 2023, 2022 and 2021, the gains and losses recognized as interest expense were immaterial. DECEMBER 31, 2023 Fair Value Measurements Derivative asset (Other current assets) Derivative liability (Other current liabilities) Nominal volume DECEMBER 31, 2022 Fair Value Measurements Derivative asset (Other current assets) Derivative liability (Other current liabilities) Nominal volume $ (Dollars in millions) DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS Foreign exchange swaps, less than 6 months TOTAL DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS 1) Net nominal amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $1,895 million. 2) Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $22 million. 3) Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $12 million. 4) Net nominal amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $2,616 million. 5) Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $22 million. 6) Net amount after deducting for offsetting swaps under ISDA agreements is $15 million. 1,895 1) $ 22 2) $ 12 3) $ 1,895 22 12 $ $ $ $ 2,616 4) $ 22 5) $ 15 6) 2,616 $ 22 $ 15 FAIR VALUE OF DEBT The fair value of long-term debt is determined either from quoted market prices as provided by participants in the secondary market or for long-term debt without quoted market prices, estimated using a discounted cash flow method based on the Company’s current borrowing rates for similar types of financing. The Company has determined that each of these fair value measurements of debt reside within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. During the first quarter of 2023, the Company issued a five year €500 million Eurobond. These notes were issued as green bonds. The fair value and carrying value of debt are summarized in the table below (dollars in millions). LONG-TERM DEBT Bonds Loans TOTAL SHORT-TERM DEBT Short-term portion of long-term debt Overdrafts and other short-term debt TOTAL 1) Debt as reported in balance sheet. DECEMBER 31, 2023 DECEMBER 31, 2022 CARRYING VALUE1) FAIR VALUE CARRYING VALUE1) FAIR VALUE $ $ $ $ 1,023 301 1,324 297 241 538 $ $ $ $ 1,022 306 1,328 297 241 538 $ $ $ $ 767 287 1,054 533 178 711 $ $ $ $ 735 292 1,027 527 178 705 ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NON-RECURRING BASIS In addition to assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company also has assets and liabilities in its balance sheet that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis including certain long-lived assets, including equity method investments, goodwill and other intangible assets, typically as it relates to impairment. The Company has determined that the fair value measurements included in each of these assets and liabilities rely primarily on Company- specific inputs and the Company’s assumptions about the use of the assets and settlements of liabilities, as observable inputs are not available. The Company has determined that each of these fair value measurements reside within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. To determine the fair value of long-lived assets as of the reporting date, the Company utilizes the projected cash flows expected to be generated by the long-lived assets, then discounts the future cash flows over the expected life of the long-lived assets. For the period 2021-2023, the Company did not record any material impairment charges on its long-lived assets for its continuing operations. 69 5. Income Taxes INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES (Dollars in millions) U.S. Non-U.S. Total PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES (Dollars in millions) Current U.S. federal Non-U.S. U.S. state and local Deferred U.S. federal Non-U.S. U.S. state and local Total income tax expense 2023 2022 2021 $ $ $ $ 29 583 612 2023 19 210 3 (7) (101) (1) 123 $ $ $ $ (3) $ 606 603 2022 32 181 5 (20) (17) (3) 178 $ $ $ (38) 652 614 2021 8 191 (2) (8) (10) (2) 177 2022 2023 2021 EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE (%) 21.0 % U.S. federal income tax rate (0.1) Non-Deductible Expenses 3.1 Foreign tax rate variances (2.2) Tax credits (0.1) Change in Valuation Allowances 0.6 Changes in tax reserves (0.2) Provision to Return (0.1) Earnings of equity investments 4.5 Withholding taxes (0.5) State taxes, net of federal benefit 0.6 Tax Audits Other Deferred Tax Asset Recognized1) 0.0 0.0 U.S. FDII Deduction 1.1 U.S. GILTI Tax — Impact of Translation Rates 1.2 Other, net Effective income tax rate 28.9 % 1) Deferred tax asset recognized in 2023 due to the transfer of certain assets and operations as part of the Company's restructuring activities. 21.0 % 1.8 4.6 (3.9) 11.6 2.7 (0.2) (0.2) 5.2 0.3 0.0 (26.7) (0.4) 3.4 1.1 (0.2) 20.1 % 21.0 % 0.5 3.6 (3.5) (1.7) (0.2) 0.6 (0.1) 4.0 0.4 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.2 0.3 29.5 % 70 Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. On December 31, 2023, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards (NOL’s) of approximately $513 million, of which approximately $419 million have no expiration date. The remaining losses expire on various dates through 2037. The Company also has $25 million of U.S. Foreign Tax Credit carry forwards, which begin to expire in 2026. Valuation allowances have been established which partially offset the related deferred assets. Such allowances are primarily provided against NOL’s of companies that have perennially incurred losses, as well as the NOL’s of companies that are start-up operations and have not established a pattern of profitability. The Company assesses all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine the amount of any required valuation allowance. During 2023, the Company recorded valuation allowances against deferred tax assets of tax losses in certain companies and a partial valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset recognized due to the transfer of certain assets and operations as part of the Company’s restructuring activities, on the basis of management’s assessment of the amount of the related deferred tax assets that are not more likely than not to be realized. The foreign tax rate variance reflects the fact that approximately two-thirds of the Company’s non-U.S. pre-tax income is generated by business operations located in tax jurisdictions where the tax rate is between 20-30%. The tax rate from quarter to quarter and from year to year is also impacted by the mix of earnings and tax rates in various jurisdictions compared to the same periods or prior years. The Company has reserves for income taxes that may become payable in future periods as a result of tax audits. These reserves represent the Company’s best estimate of the potential liability for tax exposures. Inherent uncertainties exist in estimates of tax exposures due to changes in tax law, both legislated and concluded through the various jurisdictions’ court systems. The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction, and various states and non-U.S. jurisdictions. At any given time, the Company is undergoing tax audits in several tax jurisdictions, covering multiple years. The Company is no longer subject to income tax examination by the U.S. Federal tax authorities for years prior to 2015. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examination by U.S. state or local tax authorities or by non-U.S. tax authorities for years before 2011. The Company is undergoing tax audits in several non-U.S. jurisdictions and several U.S. state jurisdictions, covering multiple years. As of December 31, 2023, as a result of those tax examinations, the Company is not aware of any proposed income tax adjustments that would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, however, other audits could result in additional increases or decreases to the unrecognized tax benefits in some future period or periods. The Company believes that some of these audits will conclude within the next 12 months and that it is reasonably possible the amount of uncertain income tax positions, including interest, may decrease by $10- $15 million due to settlement of audits and expiration of statues of limitations. The Company recognizes interest and potential penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. As of December 31, 2022, the Company recorded $46 million for unrecognized tax benefits, including $11 million of accrued interest and penalties. During 2023, the Company recorded a net increase of $8 million to income tax reserves for unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken in prior years. Also, during 2023, the Company recorded a net increase of $7 million to income tax reserves for unrecognized tax benefits based on tax positions taken in the current year. The Company had $14 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties as of December 31, 2023. Of the total unrecognized tax benefits of $64 million recorded at December 31, 2023, $33 million is classified as current income tax payable, and $31 million is classified as non-current tax payable included in Other Non-Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Substantially all of these reserves would impact the effective tax rate if released into income. 71 The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits (dollars in millions): UNRECOGNIZED TAX BENEFITS Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year Increases as a result of tax positions taken during a prior period Increases as a result of tax positions taken during the current period Decreases as a result of tax positions taken during a prior period Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities Decreases resulting from the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations Translation Difference 2023 2022 2021 $ 67 $ 65 $ 8 7 0 0 0 1 83 $ 0 7 0 (4) 0 (1) 67 $ 63 3 5 0 (4) (1) (1) 65 Total unrecognized tax benefits at end of year $ The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards that comprise significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows (dollars in millions). DEFERRED TAXES Assets Provisions Costs capitalized for tax Other Deferred Tax Asset1) Property, plant and equipment Retirement Plans Tax receivables, principally NOL’s Deferred tax assets before allowances Valuation allowances Total 2023 December 31, 2022 2021 $ $ 126 57 160 11 40 133 527 (129) 398 $ 99 43 0 12 42 123 319 (46) 273 136 29 0 0 46 109 320 (59) 261 Liabilities (6) Statutory tax allowances (6) Distribution taxes (3) Other (15) Total Net deferred tax asset 246 1) Deferred tax asset recognized in 2023 due to the transfer of certain assets and operations as part of the Company’s restructuring activities, and is partially offset by the increased valuation allowances. 0 (3) (1) (4) 394 0 (3) (2) (5) 268 $ $ $ The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s valuation allowances (dollars in millions): VALUATION ALLOWANCES AGAINST DEFERRED TAX ASSETS 2023 December 31, 2022 2021 Allowances at beginning of year Benefits reserved current year Benefits recognized current year1) Translation difference Allowances at end of year 1) Benefits reserved in the current year include the partial reserve against deferred tax assets recognized in 2023 due to the transfer of certain assets and operations as part of the Company's restructuring activities. 46 81 (2) 4 129 59 14 (27) 0 46 68 5 (9) (5) 59 $ $ $ $ $ $ 72 6. Receivables (Dollars in millions) Receivables Allowance for credit loss at beginning of year addition to allowance Write-off against allowance Translation difference Allowance for credit loss at end of year Total receivables, net of allowance 7. Inventories (Dollars in millions) Raw material Work in progress Finished products Inventories Inventory reserve at beginning of year Reversal of (addition to) reserve Translation difference Inventory reserve at end of year Total inventories, net of reserve 8. Other Non-Current Assets (Dollars in millions) Equity method investments Deferred tax assets Income tax receivables Insurance receivables Other non-current assets Total other non-current assets $ $ $ $ 2023 December 31, 2022 2021 2,206 (10) (2) 3 (0) (8) 2,198 $ $ 1,916 (8) (4) 2 0 (10) 1,907 $ $ 1,707 (12) (0) 4 1 (8) 1,699 2023 December 31, 2022 2021 457 347 296 1,100 (91) 3 (0) (89) 1,012 $ $ 445 350 265 1,060 (91) (6) 5 (91) 969 $ $ December 31, 2023 2022 $ $ 11 433 22 75 66 606 $ $ 395 283 190 867 (93) (3) 5 (91) 777 12 289 22 139 40 502 As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had one equity method investment. The Company owns 49% of Autoliv-Hirotako Safety Sdn, Bhd (parent and subsidiaries) in Malaysia which it currently does not control, but in which it exercises significant influence over operations and financial position. 73 9. Property, Plant and Equipment (Dollars in millions) Land and land improvements Buildings Machinery and equipment Construction in progress Property, plant and equipment Less accumulated depreciation Net of depreciation DEPRECIATION INCLUDED IN Cost of sales Selling, general and administrative expenses Research, development and engineering expenses, net Total December 31, 2023 2022 Estimated life 136 1,065 4,545 548 6,294 (4,102) 2,192 $ $ 125 957 4,156 522 5,760 (3,801) 1,960 n/a to 15 20-40 3-12 n/a 2023 2022 2021 340 12 24 376 $ $ 329 11 20 360 $ $ 348 13 23 384 $ $ $ $ No significant fixed asset impairments related to the Company’s operations were recognized during 2023, 2022 or 2021. The net book value of machinery and equipment and buildings and land under finance lease contracts recorded at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 were immaterial. The amortization expense related to finance leases is included with depreciation expenses disclosed in the table above. 10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets GOODWILL (Dollars in millions) Carrying amount at beginning of year Translation differences Carrying amount at end of year 2023 2022 $ $ 1,375 2 1,378 $ $ 1,387 (11) 1,375 Approximately $1.2 billion of the Company’s goodwill is associated with the 1997 merger of Autoliv AB and the Automotive Safety Products Division of Morton International, Inc. No goodwill impairment charges were recognized during 2023, 2022 or 2021. AMORTIZABLE INTANGIBLES (Dollars in millions) Gross carrying amount Accumulated amortization Carrying value 2023 2022 $ $ 391 (384) 7 $ $ 387 (380) 7 At December 31, 2023, intangible assets subject to amortization mainly relate to acquired technology. No significant impairments of intangible assets were recognized during 2023, 2022 or 2021. Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $2 million, $3 million and $10 million in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense is immaterial for all future periods. 74 11. Restructuring Restructuring provisions are made on a case-by-case basis and primarily include severance costs incurred in connection with employee reductions and plant consolidations. Restructuring costs other than employee related costs are immaterial for all periods presented and are included in the table below. The Company expects to finance restructuring programs over the next several years through cash generated from its ongoing operations or through cash available under its existing credit facilities. The Company does not expect that the execution of these programs will have an adverse impact on its liquidity position. The changes in the employee-related reserves in the table below have been charged against Other income (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The restructuring reserve balance is included within Accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. (Dollars in millions) Reserve at beginning of the period Provision - charge Provision - reversal Cash payments Translation difference Reserve at end of the period 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 32 212 (1) (35) 7 213 $ $ 88 17 (4) (64) (5) 32 $ $ 126 39 (31) (37) (8) 88 The restructuring charges in 2023 of $212 million relate to the global structural cost reduction program activities initiated in 2023, primarily in Europe. Cash payments of $35 million in 2023 mainly relate to restructuring activities in Europe. As of December 31, 2023, the majority of the restructuring reserve balance is attributed to global structural cost reduction program activities initiated in 2023 in Europe. The restructuring charges in 2022 of $17 million mainly related to footprint optimization activities in Asia and Europe. Cash payments of $64 million in 2022 were related to the structural efficiency program initiated in 2020, footprint optimization activities initiated in Europe in 2020 and in Asia in 2022. The restructuring charges in 2021 of $39 million mainly related to footprint optimization activities primarily in Asia. Reversals mainly related to the structural efficiency program initiated in 2020. Cash payments in 2021 related to the structural efficiency program initiated in 2020 and other footprint activities. 12. Product Related Liabilities Autoliv is exposed to product liability and warranty claims in the event that the Company’s products fail to perform as represented and such failure results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury, and/or property damage or other loss. The Company has reserves for product risks. Such reserves are related to product performance issues including recall, product liability and warranty issues. For further information, see Note 17. The Company records liabilities for product related risks when probable claims are identified and when it is possible to reasonably estimate costs. Changes in reserve for warranty claims are estimated based on prior experience, likely changes in performance of newer products, and the mix and volume of the products sold. The changes in reserve are recorded on an accrual basis. In 2023, the changes in reserve and cash payments mainly related to the Andrews litigation settlement with the reserve partly offset by reversal of recall related issues. In 2022, the changes in reserve and cash payments mainly related to warranty related issues. In 2021, the cash payments mainly related to recall related issues, whereof the main part was related to the “Toyota Recall” issue. The reserve for product related liabilities is included in accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. A majority of the Company’s recall related issues as of December 31, 2023 are covered by insurance. Insurance receivables are included within other current and non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had total insurance receivables related to recall issues of $81 million ($142 million as of December 31, 2022). The table below summarizes the change in the balance sheet position of the product related liabilities (dollars in millions). (Dollars in millions) Reserve at beginning of the year Change in reserve Cash payments Translation difference Reserve at end of the year 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 145 25 (74) 0 96 $ $ 144 20 (17) (2) 145 $ $ 341 49 (245) (1) 144 75 13. Debt and Credit Agreements SHORT-TERM DEBT As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, total short-term debt was $538 million and $711 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, short-term debt consisted mainly of a $297 million U.S. Private Placement and $215 million commercial paper. The Company’s subsidiaries have credit agreements, principally in the form of overdraft facilities with several local banks. Total available short-term facilities as of December 31, 2023, excluding commercial paper facilities as described below, amounted to $393 million, of which approximately $26 million was utilized. The weighted average interest rate on total short-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2023 and 2022, excluding the short-term portion of long-term debt, was 6% and 5%, respectively. LONG-TERM DEBT As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, total long-term debt was $1,324 million and $1,054 million, respectively. In March 2023, the Company priced and issued 5-year notes for a total of €500 million in the Eurobond market. The notes carry a coupon of 4.25% and matures in March 2028. In June 2020, the Company utilized its SEK 3,000 million facility with Swedish Export Credit Corporation which was signed in May 2020. The SEK 3,000 million facility matures in 2025 and carries a floating interest rate of 3M STIBOR +1.85%. In 2014, the Company issued long-term debt securities in a U.S. Private Placement. As of December 31, 2023 the total long-term debt outstanding from the 2014 issuance of $767 million consist of $285 million aggregate principal amount of 12-year senior notes with an interest rate of 4.24%; and $185 million aggregate principal amount of 15-year senior notes with an interest rate of 4.44%. CREDIT FACILITIES In May 2022, the Company entered a $1,100 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility with 11 banks. The facility matures in May 2028 and has a one-year extension option. The Company pays a commitment fee on the undrawn amount. The commitment fee is 35% of the applicable margin. The applicable margin is related to the Company's credit rating. Given the Company's current rating of BBB from S&P Global Ratings, the applicable margin is 0.425%. As of December 31, 2023, the facility was not utilized. The Company has a €3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Program in place for being able to issue notes to be traded on the Global Exchange Market of Euronext Dublin. At December 31, 2023, €500 million had been issued under this program. The Company has two commercial paper programs: one SEK 7 billion ($701 million) Swedish program and a $1 billion U.S. program. At December 31, 2023, the total amount outstanding was $215 million. The Company is not subject to any financial covenants, i.e., performance related restrictions, in any of its significant long-term borrowings or commitments. CREDIT RISK In the Company’s financial operations, credit risk arises in connection with cash deposits with banks and when entering into forward exchange agreements, swap contracts or other financial instruments. In order to reduce this risk, deposits and financial instruments are only entered with a limited number of banks up to a calculated risk amount of $200 million per bank for banks rated A- or above and up to $50 million for banks rated BBB+. The policy of the Company is to work with banks that have a strong credit rating and that participate in the Company’s financing. In addition to this, deposits of up to an aggregate amount of $2 billion can be placed in U.S. and Swedish government paper and in certain AAA rated money market funds. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had placed $290 million in money market funds compared to $237 million as of December 31, 2022. The table below shows debt maturity as cash flow. For a description of hedging instruments used as part of debt management, see the Financial Instruments section of Note 2 and Note 4. DEBT PROFILE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT BY EXPECTED MATURITY (dollars in millions) Bonds Loans Commercial papers Other short-term debt Total principal amount 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 $ $ 297 — 215 26 538 $ — $ 301 — — 301 $ $ 285 — — — 285 $ — $ — — $ — $ 554 — — — 554 Thereafter 185 $ — — — 185 $ Total long- term $ 1,024 301 — — $ 1,324 Total $ 1,321 301 215 26 $ 1,862 76 14. Shareholders’ Equity The number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2023 was 82,642,524. During 2023, the Company has retired 3,671,252 shares. DIVIDENDS Cash dividend paid per share Cash dividend declared per share OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS / ENDING BALANCE1) (Dollars in millions) Cumulative translation adjustments Net pension liability Total (ending balance) Deferred taxes on the pension liability 1) The components of Other Comprehensive Loss are net of any related income tax effects. 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 2.66 2.66 $ $ 2.58 2.58 $ $ 1.88 1.88 2023 2022 (466) (30) (496) 10 $ $ $ (492) (30) (522) 9 $ $ $ Cumulative translation effects of $12 million related to liquidated entities during 2023 have been recycled and reported as part of the net change of cumulative translation adjustment in the Comprehensive income statement and Equity statement. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM In November 2021, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $1.5 billion or up to 17 million shares (whichever comes first) between January 2022 and the end of 2024. During 2023 the Company repurchased and retired 3,671,252 shares for approximately $352 million. During 2022 the Company repurchased and retired 1,440,572 shares for approximately $115 million. In total, the Company has repurchased and retired 5,111,824 shares for approximately $467 million under the new stock repurchase program as of December 31, 2023. 15. Supplemental Cash Flow Information Payments for interest and income taxes were as follows: (Dollars in millions) Interest Income taxes 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 80 192 $ 64 215 60 207 77 16. Stock Incentive Plan The Company maintains the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Stock Incentive Plan”), pursuant to which it has granted to eligible employees and non-employee directors stock options (SOs), restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance shares (PSUs). The fair value of the RSUs and PSUs is calculated as the grant date fair value of the shares expected to be issued. The RSUs and PSUs granted in 2023, 2022 and 2021 entitle the grantee to receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional RSUs and PSUs subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying RSUs and PSUs. For the grants made during 2023, 2022 and 2021, the fair value of a RSU and a PSU was calculated by using the closing stock price on the grant date and, with respect to a PSU, assumed target performance. The grant date fair value for the RSUs and PSUs granted during 2023 was approximately $7 million and approximately $8 million, respectively. Pursuant to the Company’s non-employee director compensation policy effective May 1, 2023, the Company’s non-employee directors receive an annual RSU grant having a grant date value equal to $145,000 and the Chairman of the Board of Directors also receives an additional annual RSU grant having a grant date value equal to $85,000. All RSUs granted to non-employee directors vest in one installment on the earlier of the next AGM or the first anniversary of the grant date, in each case subject to the grantee’s continued service as a non-employee director on the vesting date with limited exceptions. The RSUs granted to the Company’s non-employee directors entitle the grantee to receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional RSUs subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying RSUs. The grant date fair value for the RSUs granted in 2023 to the Company’s non-employee directors was approximately $2 million. The source of the shares issued upon vesting of awards is generally from treasury shares. The Stock Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of up to 9,585,055 common shares for awards. At December 31, 2023, 7,027,781 of these shares have been issued for awards and 2,557,274 shares remain available for future grants. In 2015 and earlier, stock awards were granted in the form of SOs and RSUs. All SOs were granted for 10-year terms, had an exercise price equal to the fair market value per share of common stock at the date of grant, and became exercisable after one year of continued employment following the grant date. The average grant date fair values of SOs were calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Company used historical exercise data for determining the expected life assumption. Expected volatility was based on historical and implied volatility. The Company recorded approximately $14 million, $4 million and $10 million stock-based compensation expense related to RSUs and PSUs for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized is $15 million for RSUs and PSs and the weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is approximately 1.9 years. There are no remaining unrecognized compensation costs associated with SOs. Information on the number of RSUs, PSUs and SOs related to the Stock Incentive Plan during the period of 2021 to 2023 is as follows. RSUs Weighted average fair value at grant date 2023 2022 2021 $ 91.81 $ 87.56 $ 94.01 Outstanding at beginning of year Granted Shares issued Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired Outstanding at end of year 200,764 96,243 (94,055) (12,986) 189,966 218,268 85,985 (84,848) (18,641) 200,764 244,901 81,866 (99,399) (9,100) 218,268 The aggregate intrinsic value for RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2023 was approximately $21 million. PSUs Weighted average fair value at grant date 2023 2022 2021 $ 91.80 $ 88.05 $ 93.90 Outstanding at beginning of year Change in performance conditions Granted Shares issued Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired Outstanding at end of year 101,828 18,211 93,962 (26,331) (75,789) 111,881 179,311 (69,924) 82,914 (64,397) (26,076) 101,828 158,128 (44,385) 74,427 — (8,859) 179,311 The PSUs granted include assumptions regarding the ultimate number of shares that will be issued based on the probability of achievement of the performance conditions. Changes in those assumptions result in changes in the estimated shares to be issued which is reflected in the “Change in performance conditions” line above. 78 SOs Outstanding at December 31, 2020 Exercised Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired Outstanding at December 31, 2021 Exercised Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired Outstanding at December 31, 2022 Exercised Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired Outstanding at December 31, 2023 OPTIONS EXERCISABLE At December 31, 2021 At December 31, 2022 At December 31, 2023 Number of options Weighted average exercise price $ 90,175 (40,112) (188) 49,875 (8,614) (10,150) 31,111 (15,537) (485) 15,089 $ 49,875 31,111 15,089 68.13 67.49 51.74 68.71 59.28 70.40 70.77 65.12 58.63 76.97 68.71 70.77 76.97 The following summarizes information about SOs outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2023: EXERCISE PRICE $67.29 $80.40 Number outstanding & exercisable Remaining contract life (in years) Weighted average exercise price 3,945 11,144 15,089 0.14 $ 1.13 0.87 67.29 80.40 76.97 The total aggregate intrinsic value, which is the difference between the exercise price and $110.19 (closing price per share at December 31, 2023), for all “in the money” SOs, both outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2023, was immaterial. 79 17. Contingent Liabilities LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Various claims, lawsuits and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries, covering a range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities with respect to commercial, product liability and other matters. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of any litigation cannot be assured. After discussions with counsel, and with the exception of losses resulting from the antitrust proceedings described below, it is the opinion of management that the various legal proceedings and investigations to which the Company currently is a party will not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial position of Autoliv, but the Company cannot provide assurance that Autoliv will not experience material litigation, product liability or other losses in the future. ANTITRUST MATTERS Authorities in several jurisdictions have conducted broad, and in some cases, long-running investigations of suspected anti-competitive behavior among parts suppliers in the global automotive vehicle industry. These investigations included, but are not limited to, the products that the Company sells. In addition to concluded matters, authorities of other countries with significant light vehicle manufacturing or sales may initiate similar investigations. PRODUCT WARRANTY, RECALLS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Autoliv is exposed to various claims for damages and compensation if its products fail to perform as expected. Such claims can be made, and result in costs and other losses to the Company, even where the product is eventually found to have functioned properly. Where a product (actually or allegedly) fails to perform as expected or is defective, the Company may face warranty and recall claims. Where such (actual or alleged) failure or defect results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage, the Company may also face product liability and other claims. There can be no assurance that the Company will not experience material warranty, recall or product (or other) liability claims or losses in the future, or that the Company will not incur significant costs to defend against such claims. The Company may be required to participate in a recall involving its products. Each vehicle manufacturer has its own practices regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers. As suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process and assume more of the vehicle assembly functions, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly looking to their suppliers for contribution when faced with recalls and product liability claims. Government safety regulators may also play a role in warranty and recall practices. Recall decisions regarding the Company’s products may require a significant amount of judgment by us, our customers and safety regulators and are influenced by a variety of factors. Once a recall has been made, the cost of a recall is also subject to a significant amount of judgment and discussions between the Company and its customers. A warranty, recall or product-liability claim brought against the Company in excess of its insurance may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. Vehicle manufacturers are also increasingly requiring their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and bear the costs of repair and replacement of such products under new vehicle warranties. A vehicle manufacturer may attempt to hold the Company responsible for some, or all, of the repair or replacement costs of products when the product supplied did not perform as represented by us or expected by the customer in either a warranty or a recall situation. Accordingly, the future costs of warranty or recall claims by the customers may be material. However, the Company believes its established reserves are adequate. Autoliv’s warranty reserves are based upon the Company’s best estimates of amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims. The Company regularly evaluates the adequacy of these reserves, and adjusts them when appropriate. However, the final amounts actually due related to these matters could differ materially from the Company’s recorded estimates. In addition, as vehicle manufacturers increasingly use global platforms and procedures, quality performance evaluations are also conducted on a global basis. Any one or more quality, warranty or other recall issue(s) (including those affecting few units and/or having a small financial impact) may cause a vehicle manufacturer to implement measures such as a temporary or prolonged suspension of new orders, which may have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations. The Company maintains a program of insurance, which may include commercial insurance, self-insurance, or a combination of both approaches, for potential recall and product liability claims in amounts and on terms that it believes are reasonable and prudent based on our prior claims experience. The Company’s insurance policies generally include coverage of the costs of a recall, although costs related to replacement parts are generally not covered. In addition, a number of the agreements entered into by the Company, including the Spin-off Agreements, require Autoliv to indemnify the other parties for certain claims. Autoliv cannot assure that the level of coverage will be sufficient to cover every possible claim that can arise in our businesses or with respect to other obligations, now or in the future, or that such coverage always will be available should we, now or in the future, wish to extend, increase or otherwise adjust our insurance. As noted in Note 12 above, as of December 31, 2023, the Company has accrued $96 million for total product related liabilities. The majority of the total product liability accrual as of December 31, 2023, relates to recalls, which are generally covered by insurance. Insurance receivables for such recall related liabilities total $83 million as of December 31, 2023. 80 Product Liability: On September 18, 2014, Jamie Andrews filed a wrongful death products liability suit against several Autoliv entities stemming from a fatal car accident in 2013 where the plaintiff’s husband was fatally injured. The lawsuit alleged that Autoliv should be liable for a designed driver seatbelt. On December 31, 2021, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entered a Final Order and Judgment concluding that Mr. Andrews’s seatbelt was defectively designed and Autoliv was strictly liable for the design. Autoliv was ordered to pay approximately $118 million in compensatory and punitive damages and pre-judgment interests. On July 18, 2023, the Company, without admitting any liability, executed settlement agreements and resolved the lawsuit with all interested parties, concluding the matter. The final amount by which the product liability accrual exceeded the product liability insurance receivable is $8 million and includes self-insurance retention costs and deductibles. Autoliv and several of its subsidiaries have been named in a class action lawsuit that has been consolidated in a multi-district litigation (MDL) Northern District of Georgia. The plaintiffs in the MDL (the "ARC Inflator Class Action") generally allege that the defendants have violated various state competition, warranty, and trade practice laws relating to ARC inflators included in airbag modules that Autoliv or its subsidiaries allegedly supplied after Autoliv acquired certain Delphi assets (the "Delphi Acquisition") in December 2009. The Company denies these allegations. Autoliv is not aware of any performance issues regarding ARC inflators included with its airbags at the directions of its customers that it shipped following the Delphi Acquisition. The proceedings remain ongoing. The Company has determined pursuant to ASC 450 that a loss is reasonably possible with respect to the ARC Inflator Class Action. However, the Company continues to evaluate this matter, no accrual has been made, and no estimated range of potential loss can be determined at this time. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the ARC Inflator Class Action. On September 5, 2023, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (the “NHTSA”) issued an initial decision to recall approximately 52 million frontal driver and passenger airbag inflators manufactured by ARC and Delphi Automotive Systems because the NHTSA determined that the airbag inflators contain a safety defect resulting in field ruptures. Some of the ARC inflators included in the airbag modules that Autoliv or its subsidiaries supplied after the Delphi Acquisition were included in such initial decision. The NHTSA has yet to release its final decision. If NHTSA final decision results in a recall, it is anticipated that such decision will be challenged in US federal court. The Company has determined pursuant to ASC 450 that a loss is reasonably possible with respect to the NHTSA ARC recall. However, the Company continues to evaluate this matter, no accrual has been made, and no estimated range of potential loss can be determined at this time. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the NHTSA ARC recall. Specific Recalls: In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company was made aware of a potential recall by American Honda Motor Co. and the recall of approximately 449,000 vehicles relating to the malfunction of front seat belt buckles was announced on March 9, 2023 (the “Honda Buckle Recall”). The Company determined pursuant to ASC 450 that a loss with respect to the Honda Buckle Recall is probable and accrued an amount that is reflected in the total product liability accrual in the fourth quarter of 2020, increased the accrual in the fourth quarter of 2021, and reduced the accrual in the fourth quarter of 2023 based on vehicle repair cost data. Following the accrual reduction in the fourth quarter of 2023, the amount by which the product liability accrual exceeds the product liability insurance receivable with respect to the Honda Buckle Recall is $10 million and includes self-insurance retention costs and deductibles. The ultimate loss to the Company of the Honda Buckle Recall could be materially different from the amount the Company has accrued. Volvo Car USA, LLC (together with its affiliates, “Volvo”) has recalled approximately 762,000 vehicles relating to the malfunction of inflators produced by ZF (the “ZF Inflator Recall”). The recalled ZF inflators were included in airbag modules supplied by the Company only to Volvo. The recall commenced in November 2020 and later expanded in September 2021. Because the Company’s airbags were involved with the ZF Inflator Recall, the Company has determined pursuant to ASC 450 that a loss is reasonably possible with respect to the ZF Inflator Recall. The Company continues to evaluate this matter with Volvo and ZF and no accrual has been made. Although the Company currently estimates a range of $0 to $43 million with respect to this potential loss, the Company anticipates that any losses net of insurance claims and claims against ZF will be immaterial. Intellectual property: In its products, the Company utilizes technologies which may be subject to intellectual property rights of third parties. While the Company does seek to procure the necessary rights to utilize intellectual property rights associated with its products, it may fail to do so. Where the Company so fails, the Company may be exposed to material claims from the owners of such rights. Where the Company has sold products which infringe upon such rights, its customers may be entitled to be indemnified by the Company for the claims they suffer as a result thereof. Such claims could be material. The table in Note 12 above summarizes the change in the balance sheet position of the product related liabilities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. 81 18. Retirement Plans DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS Many of the Company’s employees are covered by government sponsored pension and welfare programs. Under the terms of these programs, the Company makes periodic payments to various government agencies. In addition, in some countries the Company sponsors or participates in certain non-governmental defined contribution plans. Contributions to defined contribution plans for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 were $26 million, $24 million, and $18 million, respectively. MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS The Company participates in a multiemployer plan in Sweden. This ITP-2 plan is funded through Alecta and covers employees born before 1979, for whom it provides a final pay pension benefit based on all service with participating employers. The Company must pay for wage increases in excess of inflation on service earned with previous employers. The plan also provides disability and family benefits and is more than 100% funded. The Company´s contributions to this multiemployer plan for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 were $4 million, $6 million and $5 million, respectively. DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS The Company has a number of defined benefit pension plans, both contributory and non-contributory, in the U.S., France, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, Philippines, Poland, Sweden, South Korea, Thailand, Turkey and the United Kingdom. There are funded as well as unfunded plan arrangements which provide retirement benefits to both U.S. and non-U.S. participants. The main plan is the U.S. plan for which the benefits are based on an average of the employee’s earnings and on credited service earned through December 31, 2021. In a prior year, the Company closed participation in the Autoliv ASP, Inc. Pension Plan to exclude those employees hired after December 31, 2003. Within the U.S. there is also a non-qualified restoration plan that provides benefits to employees whose benefits in the primary U.S. plan are restricted by limitations on the compensation that can be considered in calculating their benefits. Effective December 31, 2021, the Autoliv ASP, Inc. Pension Plan is frozen to new accruals and, by extension, the non- qualified restoration plan is also frozen. Settlement accounting has been recognized each quarter in 2023 and 2022 for the U.S. plans because the lump-sum payments made to plan participants during 2023 and 2022 exceeded the sum of service cost and interest cost. For the Company’s non-U.S. defined benefit plans the most significant individual plan is in the U.K. The Company has closed participation in the U.K. defined benefit plan to exclude all employees hired after April 30, 2003 with few members currently accruing benefits. CHANGES IN BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS AND PLAN ASSETS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 (Dollars in millions) Benefit obligation at beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial (gain) loss due to: Change in discount rate Experience Other assumption changes Benefits paid Plan settlements/curtailments Plan amendments Other Translation difference Benefit obligation at end of year Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Company contributions Benefits paid Plan settlements Translation difference Fair value of plan assets at end of year Pension liability recognized in the balance sheet U.S. Non-U.S. 2023 2022 2023 2022 227 — 12 5 2 2 (4) (17) — — — 226 201 24 0 (4) (17) — 204 21 $ $ $ $ $ 381 — 12 (111) 15 — (4) (66) — — — 227 343 (75) 3 (4) (66) — 201 26 $ $ $ $ $ 192 9 10 (22) (1) 24 (10) (2) 1 0 7 208 63 3 11 (10) (0) 3 70 138 $ $ $ $ $ 260 9 6 (65) 4 18 (20) (3) 2 — (19) 192 101 (27) 19 (20) — (10) 63 129 $ $ $ $ $ The U.S. plan provides that benefits may be paid in the form of a lump sum, if so elected by the participant. In order to more accurately reflect a market-derived pension obligation, Autoliv adjusts the assumed lump sum interest rate to reflect market conditions as of each December 31. This methodology is consistent with the approach required under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, which provides the rules for determining minimum funding requirements in the U.S. 82 COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLANS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 (Dollars in millions) Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of actuarial loss Settlement loss Net periodic benefit cost (Dollars in millions) Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of prior service costs Amortization of actuarial loss Settlement/curtailment (gain) loss Net periodic benefit cost 2023 U.S. 2022 2021 — $ 12 (10) 0 1 3 $ — $ 12 (14) 0 6 4 $ 2023 Non-U.S. 2022 2021 9 10 (3) 1 1 0 18 $ $ 9 6 (2) 1 1 (8) 7 $ $ 8 10 (18) 2 5 7 12 5 (2) 0 1 0 17 $ $ $ $ The service cost and amortization of prior service cost components are reported among other employee compensation costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The remaining components, interest cost, expected returns on plan assets and amortization of actuarial loss, are reported as Other non-operating items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Amortization of the net actuarial loss from accumulated other comprehensive income is made over the estimated average remaining lifetime of the plan participants (27 to 31 years) for the U.S. plans, and the estimated average remaining service lives or lifetimes of the plan participants for the non-U.S. plans, the periods varying over a wide range between the different countries depending on the age of the population concerned. COMPONENTS OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS BEFORE TAX AS OF DECEMBER 31 (Dollars in millions) Net actuarial loss Prior service cost Total accumulated other comprehensive loss recognized in the balance sheet U.S. Non-U.S. 2023 2022 2023 2022 $ $ $ 15 — 15 $ $ 22 — 22 $ $ 19 4 24 $ 18 4 22 CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS BEFORE TAX FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 (Dollars in millions) Total retirement benefit recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of year Net actuarial loss (gain) Amortization or curtailment recognition of prior service credit (cost) Amortization or settlement recognition of net gain (loss) Translation difference Total retirement benefit recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of year U.S. Non-U.S. 2023 2022 2023 2022 $ $ 22 (6) — (1) — $ 35 (7) — (6) — $ 22 2 (1) (1) 2 $ 15 $ 22 $ 24 $ 33 (15) 1 5 (2) 22 The accumulated benefit obligation for the U.S. non-contributory defined benefit pension plans was $226 million and $227 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans was $173 million and $154 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Pension plans for which the accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) is notably in excess of the plan assets reside in the following countries: U.S., Mexico, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Sweden, Thailand and Turkey. 83 PENSION PLANS FOR WHICH ABO EXCEEDS THE FAIR VALUE OF PLAN ASSETS AS OF DECEMBER 31 (Dollars in millions) Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) Accumulated Benefit Obligation (ABO) Fair value of plan assets U.S. Non-U.S. 2023 2022 2023 2022 $ 226 $ 226 204 $ 227 227 201 145 $ 116 2 134 102 2 The Company, in consultation with its actuarial advisors, determines certain key assumptions to be used in calculating the projected benefit obligation and annual net periodic benefit cost. ASSUMPTIONS USED TO DETERMINE THE BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31 (% Weighted average / % Weighted average range) Discount rate Rate of increases in compensation level 1) The % weighted average ranges in the tables above represent significant non-U.S. plans only. 5.13 n/a 2023 2022 5.41 n/a U.S. Non-U.S.1) 2023 1.00-10.25 2.25-5.00 2022 0.75-9.75 2.10-5.00 ASSUMPTIONS USED TO DETERMINE THE NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 (% Weighted average) Discount rate Rate of increases in compensation level Expected long-term rate of return on assets 2023 5.41 n/a 5.05 (% Weighted average range) Discount rate Rate of increases in compensation level Expected long-term rate of return on assets 1) The % weighted average ranges in the tables above represent significant non-U.S. plans only. 2023 0.75-9.75 2.10-5.00 4.20-4.80 U.S. 2022 2.77 n/a 5.05 Non-U.S.1) 2022 0.25-8.00 1.80-5.00 1.70-2.20 2021 2.37 2.65 5.05 2021 0.25-7.25 1.80-5.00 1.40-2.25 The discount rate for the U.S. plans has been set based on the rates of return on high-quality fixed-income investments currently available at the measurement date and expected to be available during the period the benefits will be paid. The expected timing of cash flows from the plan has also been considered in selecting the discount rate. In particular, the yields on bonds rated AA or better on the measurement date have been used to set the discount rate. The discount rate for the U.K. plan has been set based on the weighted average yields on long-term high-grade corporate bonds and is determined by reference to financial markets on the measurement date. The expected rate of increase in compensation levels and long-term rate of return on plan assets are determined based on a number of factors and must take into account long-term expectations and reflect the financial environment in the respective local market. The expected return on assets for the U.S. and U.K. plans are based on the fair value of the assets as of December 31. The level of equity exposure is currently targeted at approximately 32% for the primary U.S. plan. The investment objective is to provide an attractive risk-adjusted return that will ensure the payment of benefits while protecting against the risk of substantial investment losses. Correlations among the asset classes are used to identify an asset mix that Autoliv believes will provide the most attractive returns. Long- term return forecasts for each asset class using historical data and other qualitative considerations to adjust for projected economic forecasts are used to set the expected rate of return for the entire portfolio. The Company has assumed a long-term rate of return on the U.S. plan assets of 5.05% for calculating the 2023 expense. The Company has assumed a long-term rate of return on the non-U.S. plan assets in a range of 4.20-4.80% for 2023. The closed U.K. plan, which has a targeted allocation of almost 100% debt instruments, accounts for approximately 73% of the total non-U.S. plan assets. Autoliv made contributions to the U.S. plans during 2023 and 2022 amounting to $0 million and $3 million, respectively. Contributions to the U.K plan during 2023 and 2022 amounted to $2 million and $2 million, respectively. The Company expects to contribute $1 million to its U.S. pension plans in 2024 and is currently projecting a yearly funding at the same level in the years thereafter. For the U.K. pension plan, which is the most significant non-U.S. plan, the Company expects to contribute $2 million in 2024 and in the years thereafter. 84 FAIR VALUE OF TOTAL PLAN ASSETS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 ASSETS CATEGORY (% Weighted average) Equity securities % Debt instruments % Other assets % Total % U.S. Target allocation 32 68 — 100 U.S. Non-U.S. 2023 2022 2023 2022 31 68 1 100 23 76 1 100 0 64 36 100 0 60 40 100 The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plan assets: (Dollars in millions) Assets Non-U.S. Bonds Government Corporate Insurance Contracts Other Investments Assets at fair value Level 2 Investments measured at net asset value (NAV): Common collective trusts Total Fair value measurement at December 31, 2023 2022 $ $ $ 24 21 17 10 71 203 274 $ 15 23 14 11 63 201 264 The fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Certain assets that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. Plan assets not measured using the NAV are classified as Level 2 in the table above. Plan assets measured using the NAV mainly relate to the U.S. defined benefit pension plans and are separately disclosed as Common collective trusts below the Level 2 assets in the table above. The estimated future benefit payments for the pension benefits reflect expected future service, as appropriate. The amount of benefit payments in a given year may vary from the projected amount, especially for the U.S. plan since historically this plan pays the majority of benefits as a lump sum, where the lump sum amounts vary with market interest rates. PENSION BENEFITS EXPECTED PAYMENTS (dollars in millions) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Years 2029-2033 POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS $ U.S. Non-U.S. $ 14 17 20 19 21 91 17 12 12 14 14 84 The Company currently provides postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to a limited group of U.S. retirees. In general, the terms of the plans provide that U.S. employees who retire after attaining age 55, with 15 years of service (5 years before December 31, 2006), are reimbursed for qualified medical expenses up to a maximum annual amount. Spouses for certain retirees are also eligible for reimbursement under the plan. Life insurance coverage is available for those who elect coverage under the retiree health plan. During 2014, the plan was amended to move from a self-insured model where employees were charged an estimated premium based on anticipated plan expenses for continued coverage, to a plan where retirees are provided a fixed contribution to a Health Retirement Account (HRA). Retirees can use the HRA funds to purchase insurance through a private exchange. Employees hired on or after January 1, 2004 are not eligible to participate in the plan. 85 As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the benefit obligation for postretirement benefit plans other than pensions were $13 million and $13 million, respectively. The liability for postretirement benefits other than pensions is classified as other non-current liabilities in the balance sheet. The components of the net periodic benefit costs associated with these plans were immaterial for the years 2023, 2022 and 2021. The average discount rate used to determine the U.S. postretirement benefit obligation was 5.16% in 2023 and 5.39% in 2022. The average discount rate used in determining the postretirement benefit cost was 5.39% in 2023, 2.91% in 2022 and 2.60% in 2021. The accumulated other comprehensive income before tax associated with the postretirement benefit plans other than pensions recognized in the balance sheet as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 were $6 million and $7 million, respectively. The components of the accumulated other comprehensive income were immaterial for the years 2023 and 2022. The estimated future benefit payments for the postretirement benefits, which reflect expected future service as appropriate, are expected to be immaterial for all the future years. 19. Segment Information The Company has one operating segment which includes Autoliv’s airbag and seatbelt products and components. The operating results of the operating segment are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to assess the performance of the operating segment and make decisions about resources to be allocated to the operating segment. The Company’s customers consist of all major European, U.S. and Asian automobile manufacturers. Sales to individual customers representing 10% or more of net sales were: In 2023: Renault 10% (including Nissan and Mitsubishi) and Stellantis 10%. In 2022: Renault 11% (including Nissan and Mitsubishi), Stellantis 11% and VW 10%. In 2021: Renault 13% (including Nissan and Mitsubishi), Stellantis 11% and VW 10%. NET SALES BY REGION (Dollars in millions) China Asia, excl. China Americas Europe Total 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 2,105 1,968 3,526 2,877 10,475 $ $ 1,883 1,638 2,967 2,355 8,842 $ $ 1,766 1,641 2,535 2,289 8,230 The Company has attributed net sales to the geographic area based on the location of the entity selling the final product. External sales in the U.S. amounted to $2,342 million, $2,029 million and $1,724 million in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Of the external sales, exports from the U.S. to other regions amounted to approximately $343 million, $298 million and $280 million in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. NET SALES BY PRODUCT (Dollars in millions) Airbag, Steering Wheels and Other1) Seatbelt Products1) Total net sales 1) Including Corporate and other sales. LONG-LIVED ASSETS (Dollars in millions) China Asia, excl China Americas Europe Total 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 7,055 3,420 10,475 $ $ 5,807 3,035 8,842 $ $ 2023 2022 $ $ 592 408 570 797 2,367 $ $ 5,380 2,850 8,230 541 315 511 752 2,119 Long -lived assets in the table above consists of Property, Plant and Equipment and Operating Lease right-of-use asset. Long-lived assets in the U.S. amounted to $261 million and $257 million for 2023 and 2022, respectively. 86 20. Earnings Per Share The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows (dollars and shares in millions): Numerator: Basic and diluted: Net income attributable to common shareholders Denominator: Basic weighted average common stock Added: Weighted average stock options/share awards Diluted weighted average common stock Net earnings per share - basic Net earnings per share - diluted 2023 2022 2021 $ $ $ 488 $ 423 $ 85.0 0.2 85.2 5.74 5.72 $ $ 87.1 0.2 87.2 4.86 4.85 $ $ 435 87.5 0.2 87.7 4.97 4.96 Anti-dilutive shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 were immaterial. 21. Subsequent Events There were no reportable events subsequent to December 31, 2023. 87 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure There have been no changes to and no disagreements with our independent auditors regarding accounting or financial disclosure matters in our two most recent fiscal years. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures An evaluation has been carried out by the Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Internal Control over Financial Reporting (a) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: • • • pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the effectiveness of Autoliv’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013 framework). Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2023, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective. (b) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm Ernst & Young AB has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein as the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm under Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for the year ended December 31, 2023. (c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15-(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 88 Item 9B. Other Information On November 6, 2023, Jonas Jademyr, Executive Vice President, Quality and Project Management, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell 50% of his shares of Autoliv, Inc. common stock he would acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units and performance stock units in February 2024. These sales are intended to cover vesting taxes and would occur between February 20, 2024 and February 28, 2024. On November 6, 2023, Mikael Hagstrom, Vice President, Corporate Controller, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell 50% of his shares of Autoliv, Inc. common stock he would acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units and performance stock units in February 2024. These sales are intended to cover vesting taxes and would occur between February 20, 2024 and February 28, 2024. On November 8, 2023, Christian Swahn, Executive Vice President, Supply Chain Management, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell 50% of his shares of Autoliv, Inc. common stock he would acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units and performance stock units in February 2024. These sales are intended to cover vesting taxes and would occur between February 20, 2024 and February 28, 2024. On November 10, 2023, Fredrik Westin, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell 50% of his shares of Autoliv, Inc. common stock he would acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units and performance stock units in February 2024 and February 2025. These sales are intended to cover vesting taxes and would occur between (i) February 20, 2024 and February 28, 2024 and (ii) February 21, 2025 and February 28, 2025. On November 13, 2023, Mikael Bratt, President & Chief Executive Officer, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell 50% of his shares of Autoliv, Inc. common stock he would acquire upon the vesting of performance stock units on February 20, 2024. These sales are intended to cover vesting taxes and would occur between February 20, 2024 and February 28, 2024. On November 13, 2023, Jordi Lombarte, Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell 50% of his shares of Autoliv, Inc. common stock he would acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units and performance stock units in February 2024 net of shares withheld for taxes. These sales would occur between February 20, 2024 and February 28, 2024. On November 14, 2023, Colin Naughton, President, Autoliv Asia, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell 45% of his shares of Autoliv, Inc. common stock he would acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units and performance stock units in February 2024. These sales are intended to cover vesting taxes and would occur between February 20, 2024 and February 28, 2024. On November 14, 2023, Magnus Jarlegren, President, Autoliv Europe, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell 50% of his shares of Autoliv, Inc. common stock he would acquire upon the vesting of restricted stock units and performance stock units in February 2024. These sales are intended to cover vesting taxes and would occur between February 20, 2024 and February 28, 2024. On November 15, 2023, Anthony Nellis, President & Chief Executive Officer, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell up to 760 of shares of Autoliv, Inc. common stock, which would be acquired upon the exercise of vested stock options expiring in 2025, with any such sales to occur between (i) February 20, 2024 and March 22, 2024, (ii) May 1, 2024 and June 14, 2024, (iii) July 24, 2024 and September 13, 2024, and (iv) October 23, 2024 and December 13, 2024, subject to certain conditions. 89 PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance The information required by Item 10. regarding executive officers, directors and nominees for election as directors of Autoliv, Autoliv’s Audit Committee, Autoliv’s code of ethics, and compliance with Section 16(A) of the Securities Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference from the information under the captions “Executive Officers of the Company” and “Proposal 1: Election of Directors”, “Committees of the Board” and “Audit and Risk Committee Report”, “Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Conduct”, and “Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports”, respectively, in the Company’s 2024 Proxy Statement. Information on Board meeting attendance is provided under the caption “Board Meetings” in the 2024 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information required by Item 11. regarding executive compensation for the year ended December 31, 2023 is included under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the 2024 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by the same item regarding Leadership Development and Compensation Committee is included in the sections “Leadership Development and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Leadership Development and Compensation Committee Report” in the 2024 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The information required by Item 12. regarding beneficial ownership of Autoliv’s common stock is included under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the 2024 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Shares Previously Authorized for Issuance Under the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan The following table provides information as of December 31, 2023, about the common stock that may be issued under the Autoliv, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan. The Company does not have any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by its stockholders. (a) Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights(2) (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))(3) 316,936 $ — 316,936 $ 76.97 — 76.97 2,557,274 — 2,557,274 Plan Category Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders Total (1) (2) (3) Autoliv, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 6, 2009, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated December 17, 2010 and Amendment No. 2 dated May 8, 2012. Excludes restricted stock units and performance shares which convert to shares of common stock for no consideration. All such shares are available for issuance pursuant to grants of full-value stock awards. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Information regarding the Company’s policy and procedures concerning related party transactions is included under the caption “Related Person Transactions” in the 2024 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding director independence can be found under the caption “Board Independence” in the 2024 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services The information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A regarding principal accounting fees and the information required by Item 14 regarding the pre-approval process of accounting services provided to Autoliv is included under the caption “Proposal 3. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Appointment” in the 2024 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. 90 Item 15. Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules PART IV (a) (1) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) Documents Filed as Part of this Report Financial Statements Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021; Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021; Consolidated Balance Sheets – as of December 31, 2023 and 2022; Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021; Consolidated Statements of Total Equity – as of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021; Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements; and (vii) Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB Auditor ID No. 1433). (2) Financial Statement Schedules All of the schedules specified under Regulation S-X to be provided by Autoliv have been omitted either because they are not applicable, they are not required, or the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto. (3) Exhibits Exhibit No. Description 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 Distribution Agreement, dated June 28, 2018, between Veoneer, Inc. and Autoliv, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 2, 2018). Autoliv’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 22, 2015). Autoliv’s Third Restated By-Laws, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date December 18, 2015). Indenture, dated March 30, 2009, between Autoliv, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Autoliv’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 30, 2009) Second Supplemental Indenture (including Form of Global Note), dated March 15, 2012, between Autoliv, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 15, 2012). Form of Note Purchase and Guaranty Agreement dated April 23, 2014, among Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv, Inc. and the purchasers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 25, 2014). Amendment and Waiver 2014 Note Purchase and Guaranty Agreement, dated May 24, 2018 among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and the noteholders named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018). Agency Agreement dated June 26, 2018 among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP Inc. and HSBC Bank PLC, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018). Description of Registrant´s Securities, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 19, 2021). Amended and Restated Agency Agreement, dated February 22, 2022, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and the dealers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 22, 2022). Base listing Particulars Agreement, dated February 17, 2023, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and the dealers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 16, 2023). Amended and Restated Programme Agreement, dated February 17, 2023, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and the dealers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001- 12933, filing date March 16, 2023). 91 10.1+ 10.2+ 10.3+ 10.4+ 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8+ 10.9+ 10.10+ 10.11 10.12+ 10.13 10.14+ 10.15+ 10.16 10.17+ 10.18+* 10.19+ 10.20+ Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 6, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of the Definitive Proxy Statement of Autoliv, Inc. on Schedule 14A (filing date March 23, 2009). Amendment No. 1 to the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan as amended and restated on May 6, 2009, dated December 17, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 23, 2011). Amendment No. 2 to the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on May 6, 2009, dated May 8, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 20, 2012). Amendment No. 3 to the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, dated April 24, 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 28, 2017). Form of Note Purchase and Guaranty Agreement, dated April 23, 2014, among Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv, Inc. and the purchasers named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 25, 2014). General Terms and Conditions for Swedish Depository Receipts in Autoliv, Inc. representing common shares in Autoliv, Inc., effective as of May 30, 2018, with Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) serving as custodian, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018). Tax Matters Agreement, dated June 28, 2018, between Veoneer, Inc. and Autoliv, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 2, 2018). Employment Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Mikael Bratt, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018). Employment Agreement, dated March 21, 2018 and effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Jordi Lombarte incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018). Employment Agreement, effective as of June 29, 2018, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Anthony J. Nellis, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 27, 2018). Cooperation Agreement, dated March 1, 2019, between Autoliv, Inc. and Cevian Capital II GP Limited, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date March 1, 2019). Employment Agreement, dated March 18, 2019, between Autoliv, Inc. and Christian Swahn, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 25, 2019). Form of Indemnification Agreement between Autoliv, Inc. and its directors and certain of its executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 25, 2019). Employment Agreement, dated November 26, 2019 and effective as of March 1, 2020, between Autoliv, Inc. and Fredrik Westin, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 21, 2020). Form of Employee performance share units grant agreement (2020) to be used under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 24, 2020). Facility Agreement, dated May 28, 2020, by and among Autoliv AB, as borrower, Autoliv, Inc. and Autoliv ASP, as guarantors, and AB Svensk Exportkredit, as lender, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 17, 2020). Employment Agreement, dated June 8, 2020 and effective as of June 15, 2020, by between Autoliv, Inc. and Kevin Fox, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 17, 2020). Amendment No. 1, effective as of July 1, 2020, to Employment Agreement, effective March 21, 2018, by and between Autoliv Inc. and Jordi Lombarte, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 16, 2023). Employment Agreement, effective as of August 17, 2020, by and between Autoliv AB and Mikael Hagström incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 23, 2020). Employment Agreement, dated October 1, 2020 and effective as of November 1, 2020, by and between Autoliv Inc. and Colin Naughton incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021). 92 10.21+ 10.22+ 10.23+ 10.24+ 10.25+ 10.26+ 10.27+ 10.28 10.29+ 10.30+ 10.31+ 10.32+ 10.33+ 10.34+ 10.35+ 10.36+ Amendment No. 2, effective as of March 9, 2021, to Employment Agreement, effective March 21, 2018, by and between Autoliv Inc. and Jordi Lombarte incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021). Form of Employee restricted stock units grant agreement (2021) to be used under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021). Form of Employee performance share units grant agreement (2021) to be used the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021). Amendment No. 1, effective as of April 1, 2021, to Employment Agreement, effective March 18, 2019, by and between Autoliv Inc. and Christian Swahn incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 23, 2021). Employment Agreement, dated December 14, 2021 and effective as of January 19, 2021, by and between Autoliv Inc. and Sng Yih incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 22, 2022). Form of Employee restricted stock units grant agreement (2022) to be used under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 22, 2022). Form of Employee performance share units grant agreement (2022) to be used promised under the Autoliv, Inc 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date April 22, 2022). Facilities Agreement, dated May 23, 2022, among Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Citibank, N.A., London Branch, Mizuho Bank, Ltd., Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ), and the other parties and lenders named therein, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 22, 2022). Autoliv, Inc. Non-employee Director Compensation Policy, effective November 1, 2022 incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 21, 2022). Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2022 and effective as of January 15, 2023, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Jonas Jademyr, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 16, 2023). Amendment, dated and effective December 5, 2022, to Employment Agreement, effective as of January 23, 2020, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Svante Mogefors, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-12933, filing date February 16, 2023). Autoliv, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy effective May 1, 2023, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 21, 2023). Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement (2023) to be used under the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 21, 2023). Employment Agreement, dated May 17, 2023, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Petra Albuschus incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 21, 2023). Mutual Separation Agreement, dated July 10, 2023, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Frithjof Oldorff incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date July 21, 2023). Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated October 1, 2023, by and between Autoliv, Inc. and Colin Naughton incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-12933, filing date October 20, 2023). 10.37+* Employment Agreement, dated November 21, 2023, by and between Autoliv Switzerland GmbH and Magnus Jarlegren. 21* 23* 31.1* 31.2* 32.1* Autoliv’s List of Subsidiaries. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 93 32.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 97.1* Autoliv, Inc. Compensation Recoupment Policy. 101.INS* Inline XBRL Instance Document – The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Date File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document. 101.SCH* Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema with Embedded Linkbase Document. 104* Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the inline XBRL document). * Filed herewith. + Management contract or compensatory plan. † Confidential treatment requested as to portions of the exhibit. Confidential materials omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 94 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, as of February 20, 2024. AUTOLIV, INC. (Registrant) By /s/ Fredrik Westin Fredrik Westin Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated, as of February 20, 2024. Title Name Chairman of the Board of Directors /s/ Jan Carlson Jan Carlson Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) and Director /s/ Mikael Bratt Mikael Bratt Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer) /s/ Fredrik Westin Fredrik Westin Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director /s/ Laurie Brlas Laurie Brlas /s/ Hasse Johansson Hasse Johansson /s/ Leif Johansson Leif Johansson /s/ Franz-Josef Kortüm Franz-Josef Kortüm /s/ Frédéric Lissalde Frédéric Lissalde /s/ Xiaozhi Liu Xiaozhi Liu /s/ Gustav Lundgren Gustav Lundgren /s/ Martin Lundstedt Martin Lundstedt /s/ Thaddeus Senko Thaddeus Senko 95 Glossary and Definitions In this report, the following company or industry specific terms and abbreviations are used: CAPITAL EMPLOYED Total equity and net debt (net cash). CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Investments in property, plant and equipment. CPV Content Per Vehicle, i.e. value of the safety products in a vehicle. EARNINGS PER SHARE Net income attributable to controlling interest relative to weighted average number of shares (net of treasury shares) assuming dilution and basic, respectively. EBITDA Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization GROSS MARGIN Gross profit relative to sales. MEDIUM AND LOW INCOME MARKETS Includes all markets except North America, Western Europe, Japan and South Korea. HEADCOUNT Employees plus temporary personnel. HIGH INCOME MARKETS Includes North America, Western Europe, Japan and South Korea. INVENTORY OUTSTANDING IN RELATION TO SALES Outstanding inventory relative to annualized fourth quarter sales. LEVERAGE RATIO Debt per the Policy (Net debt adjusted for pension liabilities) in relation to EBITDA per the Policy (Adjusted EBITDA) (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, other non-operating items, net, income from equity method investments and capacity alignments), see Item 7 for a calculation of this non-U.S. GAAP measure. LVP Light vehicle production of light motor vehicles with a gross weight of up to 3.5 metric tons. This 10-K includes content supplied by S&P Global; Copyright © Light Vehicle Production Forecast, January 2024. All rights reserved. S&P Global is a global supplier of independent industry information. The permission to use S&P Global copyrighted reports, data and information does not constitute an endorsement or approval by S&P Global of the manner, format, context, content, conclusion, opinion or viewpoint in which S&P Global reports, data and information or its derivations are used or referenced herein. NET DEBT Short and long-term debt including debt-related derivatives less cash and cash equivalents, see Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures in Item 7 for a reconciliation of this non-U.S. GAAP measure. 96 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES Employees with a continuous employment agreement, recalculated to full time equivalent heads. OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer referring to customers assembling new vehicles. OPERATING MARGIN Operating income relative to sales. OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL Current assets excluding cash and cash equivalents less current liabilities excluding short-term debt. Any current derivatives reported in current assets and current liabilities related to net debt are excluded from operating working capital. See Non-U.S. GAAP Performance Measures in Item 7 for reconciliation of this non-U.S. GAAP measure. PAYABLES OUTSTANDING IN RELATION TO SALES Outstanding payables relative to annualized fourth quarter sales. RECEIVABLES OUTSTANDING IN RELATION TO SALES Outstanding receivables relative to annualized fourth quarter sales. RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED Operating income and equity in earnings of affiliates, relative to average capital employed. RETURN ON TOTAL EQUITY Net income relative to average total equity. TRADE WORKING CAPITAL Outstanding receivables and outstanding inventory less outstanding payables. 97 Each year, Autoliv’s products save 35,000 lives.
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above