More annual reports from Alpha Pro Tech:
2020 ReportPeers and competitors of Alpha Pro Tech:
Mode Global Holdings PLCevolution.
Afterpay Limited FY20 Annual Report
Highlights
Performance
highlights.
Key Operating Metrics
$11.1b
Up
112%
Afterpay
Underlying
Sales 1
$5.2b
FY19
FY20
9.9m
Up
116%
Afterpay
Active
Customers 1, 2
4.6m
FY19
FY20
Key Financial Metrics
Group
Total
Income
Afterpay
Total
Income1
$519.2 million
Up 97% on prior year
$502.7 million
Up 103% on prior year
Group
Margin 2
Net Transaction
$261.3 million
Up 101% on prior year
Afterpay
Net Transaction
Margin
$250.2 million
Up 110% on prior year
2.3% 3
Afterpay
Active
Merchants 1, 2
2
55.4k
Up
72%
32.3k
Change calculations may not
equate due to rounding.
Notes: 1. Unaudited information.
2. Active is defined as having
transacted at least once in the
last 12 months.
EBITDA
(excluding
Significant items)
$44.4 million
Up 73% on prior year
FY19
FY20
Change calculations may not equate due to rounding. Notes: 1. Afterpay Total Income includes Afterpay Income and Other Income (Late Fees), excludes Pay Now
Revenue. 2. Group Net Transaction Margin is equal to Afterpay Net Transaction Margin and Pay Now Gross Margin. 3. Afterpay Net Transaction Margin as a percentage of
3
Afterpay Underlying Sales.
Performance
highlights.
Key Operating Metrics
$11.1b
Up
112%
$5.2b
4.6m
32.3k
FY19
FY20
9.9m
Up
116%
FY19
FY20
55.4k
Up
72%
Afterpay
Underlying
Sales 1
Afterpay
Active
Customers 1, 2
Afterpay
Active
Merchants 1, 2
2
Key Financial Metrics
Group
Total
Income
Afterpay
Total
Income1
$519.2 million
Up 97% on prior year
$502.7 million
Up 103% on prior year
Group
Net Transaction
Margin 2
$261.3 million
Up 101% on prior year
Afterpay
Net Transaction
Margin
$250.2 million
Up 110% on prior year
2.3% 3
Change calculations may not
equate due to rounding.
Notes: 1. Unaudited information.
2. Active is defined as having
transacted at least once in the
last 12 months.
EBITDA
(excluding
Significant items)
$44.4 million
Up 73% on prior year
FY19
FY20
Change calculations may not equate due to rounding. Notes: 1. Afterpay Total Income includes Afterpay Income and Other Income (Late Fees), excludes Pay Now
Revenue. 2. Group Net Transaction Margin is equal to Afterpay Net Transaction Margin and Pay Now Gross Margin. 3. Afterpay Net Transaction Margin as a percentage of
Afterpay Underlying Sales.
3
About Afterpay
Founded five years ago in Sydney,
Afterpay is deeply committed to
Australia, Afterpay has over 10 million
delivering positive outcomes for
customers and 55,000-plus merchants
customers. The majority of Afterpay’s
now using the platform globally across
income is derived from merchants,
Australia, US, UK (where it is called
rather than customers. If a customer
Clearpay) and New Zealand. Afterpay
misses a payment, they won’t be able
has also just launched in Canada.
to use Afterpay until the payments
Afterpay’s global team is currently
are up-to-date. Late payment fees are
made up of more than 650 people
charged but are fixed, capped and do
and growing.
Afterpay’s business model is
completely free for customers who
pay on time – helping people spend
not accumulate over time. Customers
are never entrapped in revolving
debt and never incur interest. We are
focused on supporting our community
responsibly without incurring interest,
of shoppers.
fees or extended debt. Afterpay
We trust in the next generation and
empowers customers to access the
share a vision of a more accessible
things they want and need, while still
and sustainable world in which people
allowing them to maintain financial
are rewarded for doing the right thing.
wellness and control, by splitting
payments in four, for both online
and in-store purchases.
Afterpay’s mission is to power an
economy in which everyone wins.
4
5
About Afterpay
Founded five years ago in Sydney,
Afterpay is deeply committed to
Australia, Afterpay has over 10 million
delivering positive outcomes for
customers and 55,000-plus merchants
customers. The majority of Afterpay’s
now using the platform globally across
income is derived from merchants,
Australia, US, UK (where it is called
rather than customers. If a customer
Clearpay) and New Zealand. Afterpay
misses a payment, they won’t be able
has also just launched in Canada.
to use Afterpay until the payments
Afterpay’s global team is currently
are up-to-date. Late payment fees are
made up of more than 650 people
charged but are fixed, capped and do
and growing.
Afterpay’s business model is
completely free for customers who
pay on time – helping people spend
not accumulate over time. Customers
are never entrapped in revolving
debt and never incur interest. We are
focused on supporting our community
responsibly without incurring interest,
of shoppers.
fees or extended debt. Afterpay
We trust in the next generation and
empowers customers to access the
share a vision of a more accessible
things they want and need, while still
and sustainable world in which people
allowing them to maintain financial
are rewarded for doing the right thing.
wellness and control, by splitting
payments in four, for both online
and in-store purchases.
Afterpay’s mission is to power an
economy in which everyone wins.
Contents
2 Highlights
6 FY20 in Review
24 Directors’ Report
52 Remuneration Report
84 Financial Report
140 Auditor’s Report
4
5
FY20 in Review
Letter from the Chair
2020 in
Review.
Dear Shareholders,
At the outset, I would like to thank all
of our employees for their amazing
efforts while working under the often
challenging conditions brought about
by COVID-19. Across all our locations,
all of our people adapted to the changed
circumstances and remained focused
and committed on providing the best
service for all our stakeholders.
The Afterpay
Evolution
The past five years has seen
the company scale rapidly and
it has had to mature quickly to
keep up with the expectations
of our stakeholders. As such, the
business has evolved substantially
over this time, which has been
both challenging and rewarding.
We have
transitioned from
a top 300 to a
top 100
company
and are one
of the top 50
largest
companies
in Australia by
market cap
We
operate in
5
countries
We have grown
from <30 employees
in FY16 to
>650
employees
in FY20
We have had
Our customers
five years of
Our merchant partners
operations which
Our regulators, and the
has helped us better
Expectations of our
understand:
Communities
Afterpay continued its strong
Our performance throughout FY20
Our FY20 achievements are a
Our people are our greatest asset.
The team at Afterpay have one thing
momentum in the 2020 financial year,
demonstrates the power of our
testament to the amazing team
The Afterpay team has expanded
in common – they are extremely
despite the impacts being felt globally
differentiated model and our ability to
at Afterpay. The commitment and
significantly over the past five years.
passionate about the business and the
as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
adapt despite adversity in economic
passion of our employees is reflected
With more than 650 employees,
value proposition to our customers
Our employees, customers, merchant
and social conditions. We have
in the successful execution of our
how we manage the wellbeing and
and retailers. Over the past 12 months,
partners and shareholders have all
continued to provide a budgeting
strategy over the past five years.
retention of our highly talented teams,
there has been a considerable focus
been impacted. The second half of
solution to our growing Gen Z and
It is important to reflect on what has
whilst continuing to attract new talent,
on growing the capacity and capability
the financial year was firmly focused
Millennial customer cohorts, which
been achieved in a relatively short
is of utmost importance.
of our teams, and ensuring we are well
on the wellbeing of our people and
enables them to pay for goods in four
period of time. I thank all our talented
providing support to our stakeholders
instalments, without incurring interest
employees for everything they have
wherever possible. The true impacts
or revolving debt.
of COVID-19 are yet to become clear
within communities around the world.
In the meantime, we will remain
flexible in our management of the
business day to day whilst progressing
our strategic objectives.
A business model in which profitability
relies on customers paying on time
is extremely valuable in periods of
economic uncertainty. This has been
evidenced through the continued
decline in credit card usage and the
continued shift towards debit during
the pandemic. Having a business
that is heavily weighted towards
e-commerce has been particularly
beneficial with the ever increasing
shift to online spending. This delivered
more customers to our platform and
attracted more retailers to our offering.
done, and continue to do, to deliver
value for both our shareholders and
stakeholders alike.
Our People
are what
makes us
great
Remuneration
As disclosed in our FY19 Remuneration
Report, we developed a new
remuneration framework for FY20.
Our global compensation framework
has been designed to attract the best
talent and treat people fairly. We strive
to be globally consistent and market
competitive while respecting local
market nuances. Our framework
is underpinned by the philosophy
of ‘Acting as Owners’ and delivering
strong outcomes for our customers,
merchants and shareholders.
The Remuneration Report outlines
our new FY20 executive remuneration
framework in detail as well as
remuneration outcomes for the FY20
financial year.
equipped to deliver our significant
growth aspirations.
Accompanying this rapid growth
of our workforce has been a number
of renewed policies and processes,
which ensure what we have in place
is fit for purpose. There have also
been a range of areas identified
where we can improve our employee
value proposition.
6
7
Letter from the Chair
2020 in
Review.
Dear Shareholders,
At the outset, I would like to thank all
of our employees for their amazing
efforts while working under the often
challenging conditions brought about
by COVID-19. Across all our locations,
all of our people adapted to the changed
circumstances and remained focused
and committed on providing the best
service for all our stakeholders.
The Afterpay
Evolution
The past five years has seen
the company scale rapidly and
it has had to mature quickly to
keep up with the expectations
of our stakeholders. As such, the
business has evolved substantially
over this time, which has been
both challenging and rewarding.
We have
transitioned from
a top 300 to a
top 100
company
and are one
of the top 50
largest
companies
in Australia by
market cap
We
operate in
5
countries
We have grown
from <30 employees
in FY16 to
>650
employees
in FY20
We have had
five years of
operations which
has helped us better
understand:
Our customers
Our merchant partners
Our regulators, and the
Expectations of our
Communities
Afterpay continued its strong
Our performance throughout FY20
Our FY20 achievements are a
Our people are our greatest asset.
The team at Afterpay have one thing
momentum in the 2020 financial year,
demonstrates the power of our
testament to the amazing team
The Afterpay team has expanded
in common – they are extremely
despite the impacts being felt globally
differentiated model and our ability to
at Afterpay. The commitment and
significantly over the past five years.
passionate about the business and the
as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
adapt despite adversity in economic
passion of our employees is reflected
With more than 650 employees,
value proposition to our customers
Our employees, customers, merchant
and social conditions. We have
in the successful execution of our
how we manage the wellbeing and
and retailers. Over the past 12 months,
partners and shareholders have all
continued to provide a budgeting
strategy over the past five years.
retention of our highly talented teams,
there has been a considerable focus
been impacted. The second half of
solution to our growing Gen Z and
It is important to reflect on what has
whilst continuing to attract new talent,
on growing the capacity and capability
the financial year was firmly focused
Millennial customer cohorts, which
been achieved in a relatively short
is of utmost importance.
of our teams, and ensuring we are well
on the wellbeing of our people and
enables them to pay for goods in four
period of time. I thank all our talented
providing support to our stakeholders
instalments, without incurring interest
employees for everything they have
wherever possible. The true impacts
or revolving debt.
of COVID-19 are yet to become clear
within communities around the world.
In the meantime, we will remain
flexible in our management of the
business day to day whilst progressing
our strategic objectives.
A business model in which profitability
relies on customers paying on time
is extremely valuable in periods of
economic uncertainty. This has been
evidenced through the continued
decline in credit card usage and the
continued shift towards debit during
the pandemic. Having a business
that is heavily weighted towards
e-commerce has been particularly
beneficial with the ever increasing
shift to online spending. This delivered
more customers to our platform and
attracted more retailers to our offering.
done, and continue to do, to deliver
value for both our shareholders and
stakeholders alike.
Our People
are what
makes us
great
equipped to deliver our significant
growth aspirations.
Accompanying this rapid growth
of our workforce has been a number
of renewed policies and processes,
which ensure what we have in place
is fit for purpose. There have also
been a range of areas identified
where we can improve our employee
value proposition.
Remuneration
As disclosed in our FY19 Remuneration
Report, we developed a new
remuneration framework for FY20.
Our global compensation framework
has been designed to attract the best
talent and treat people fairly. We strive
to be globally consistent and market
competitive while respecting local
market nuances. Our framework
is underpinned by the philosophy
of ‘Acting as Owners’ and delivering
strong outcomes for our customers,
merchants and shareholders.
The Remuneration Report outlines
our new FY20 executive remuneration
framework in detail as well as
remuneration outcomes for the FY20
financial year.
6
7
Diversity and Inclusion
As a company that was born of
thinking differently, a diverse and
inclusive culture is pivotal to our future
success. Being a global business, there
already exists a level of diversity in the
cultural norms associated with each
region. This will continue to expand
as we move into new geographies.
A new Diversity and Inclusion Policy
A new Diversity and Inclusion Policy
was developed which outlines our
commitment to all of our employees,
regardless of gender, marital or family
status, sexual orientation, gender
identity, age, disability, ethnicity,
religious beliefs, cultural background,
socio-economic background,
perspective and experience.
Our focus on gender diversity in FY20
has delivered positive outcomes
across the business and the Board
has set gender targets for Directors
and senior management of 40% male,
40% female, 20% open, by 2023.
Employee health
and wellbeing through
COVID-19
The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic
There have, and will continue to be,
are continuing to be felt by our
unintended consequences resulting
employees globally. Our immediate
from the various government imposed
response plan prioritised the health
restrictions. Mental health issues are
and wellbeing of our teams, and
continues to be our focus. In mid-
of particular concern for everyone and
is something we are focused on at
Afterpay. Health and wellbeing surveys
have been conducted to ensure we are
monitoring the mental health of our
employees and listening to how they
are feeling.
We will continue to monitor and identify
further ways to support our employees
during this challenging period.
In May 2020, events that occurred in
March all employees were asked to
the US saw the rise to prominence of
work from home to mitigate the risks
the Black Lives Matter movement on
of contracting the virus and to keep
a global scale. This movement raised
our people safe.
awareness within our business on
issues relating to racial injustice, and
other under-served communities
across the world. We will continue
to identify ways to support these
communities. In Australia we know
more needs to be done to educate and
raise awareness of issues impacting
Indigenous people. As part of our
Diversity and Inclusion strategy we will
identify ways in which we can support
and positively make a difference in the
countries in which we operate.
Further information on our Diversity
and Inclusion outcomes and strategy
are included in the Do The Right Thing
section of this Annual Report.
8
Our inbuilt risk settings
prevent customers revolving
in debt and the revenue
we generate from late fees
as a proportion of our income
continues to decline.
Continuing
to Engage with
Regulators
Afterpay has continued to engage
with regulators in all regions in FY20.
In an environment where the buy now
pay later sector is growing and diverse,
it is imperative that we continue to
engage with regulators to explain how
the Afterpay model is different and the
consumer benefits we generate from
our focus on responsible spending.
Our inbuilt risk settings prevent
customers revolving in debt, and the
revenue we generate from late fees
as a proportion of our total income
continues to decline.
During FY20 there were opportunities
for Afterpay to participate in various
Australian forums, such as the
development of a Buy Now Pay
Later Code of Practice which is still in
progress. Afterpay remains strongly
supportive of the Code.
AUSTRAC Update
The independent audit, in respect
of anti-money laundering/counter
terrorism financing (AML/CTF),
required by AUSTRAC, was completed
and a report was provided to the
regulator in November 2019. The
Report referred to matters of historic
non-compliance by Afterpay and
made recommendations in relation
to Afterpay’s ongoing AML/ CTF
compliance. Afterpay accepted and
acted on the recommendations made.
Pleasingly, the Independent Auditor
confirmed that Afterpay’s current
program is aligned with the AML/
CTF Act and that Afterpay is a low risk
business in regards to its likelihood of
being used for the purposes of money
laundering or terrorist financing. The
Auditor also noted that Afterpay has
Afterpay made submissions to both
a strong compliance culture.
the Senate Committee Inquiry into
Financial Technology and Regulatory
Technology and the Reserve Bank
of Australia’s Issues Paper on
payment system regulation. The
recommendations from the Senate
Committee Inquiry are due in 2020,
while the outcomes from the RBA
Issues Paper has been deferred to 2021.
AUSTRAC is still considering the
Independent Auditor’s report, and
we continue to fully cooperate with
the regulator.
Afterpay continues to proactively
engage with regulators in the US and
the UK to highlight its commitment to
consumer protection and responsibility
and compliance with applicable laws.
9
Diversity and Inclusion
As a company that was born of
thinking differently, a diverse and
inclusive culture is pivotal to our future
success. Being a global business, there
already exists a level of diversity in the
cultural norms associated with each
region. This will continue to expand
as we move into new geographies.
A new Diversity and Inclusion Policy
A new Diversity and Inclusion Policy
was developed which outlines our
commitment to all of our employees,
regardless of gender, marital or family
status, sexual orientation, gender
identity, age, disability, ethnicity,
religious beliefs, cultural background,
socio-economic background,
perspective and experience.
Our focus on gender diversity in FY20
has delivered positive outcomes
across the business and the Board
has set gender targets for Directors
and senior management of 40% male,
40% female, 20% open, by 2023.
awareness within our business on
issues relating to racial injustice, and
other under-served communities
across the world. We will continue
to identify ways to support these
communities. In Australia we know
more needs to be done to educate and
raise awareness of issues impacting
Indigenous people. As part of our
Diversity and Inclusion strategy we will
identify ways in which we can support
and positively make a difference in the
countries in which we operate.
Further information on our Diversity
and Inclusion outcomes and strategy
are included in the Do The Right Thing
section of this Annual Report.
8
Employee health
and wellbeing through
COVID-19
The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic
There have, and will continue to be,
are continuing to be felt by our
unintended consequences resulting
employees globally. Our immediate
from the various government imposed
response plan prioritised the health
restrictions. Mental health issues are
and wellbeing of our teams, and
continues to be our focus. In mid-
In May 2020, events that occurred in
March all employees were asked to
the US saw the rise to prominence of
work from home to mitigate the risks
the Black Lives Matter movement on
of contracting the virus and to keep
a global scale. This movement raised
our people safe.
of particular concern for everyone and
is something we are focused on at
Afterpay. Health and wellbeing surveys
have been conducted to ensure we are
monitoring the mental health of our
employees and listening to how they
are feeling.
We will continue to monitor and identify
further ways to support our employees
during this challenging period.
Our inbuilt risk settings
prevent customers revolving
in debt and the revenue
we generate from late fees
as a proportion of our income
continues to decline.
Continuing
to Engage with
Regulators
Afterpay has continued to engage
with regulators in all regions in FY20.
In an environment where the buy now
pay later sector is growing and diverse,
it is imperative that we continue to
engage with regulators to explain how
the Afterpay model is different and the
consumer benefits we generate from
our focus on responsible spending.
Our inbuilt risk settings prevent
customers revolving in debt, and the
revenue we generate from late fees
as a proportion of our total income
continues to decline.
During FY20 there were opportunities
for Afterpay to participate in various
Australian forums, such as the
development of a Buy Now Pay
Later Code of Practice which is still in
progress. Afterpay remains strongly
supportive of the Code.
AUSTRAC Update
The independent audit, in respect
of anti-money laundering/counter
terrorism financing (AML/CTF),
required by AUSTRAC, was completed
and a report was provided to the
regulator in November 2019. The
Report referred to matters of historic
non-compliance by Afterpay and
made recommendations in relation
to Afterpay’s ongoing AML/ CTF
compliance. Afterpay accepted and
acted on the recommendations made.
Pleasingly, the Independent Auditor
confirmed that Afterpay’s current
program is aligned with the AML/
CTF Act and that Afterpay is a low risk
business in regards to its likelihood of
being used for the purposes of money
laundering or terrorist financing. The
Auditor also noted that Afterpay has
Afterpay made submissions to both
a strong compliance culture.
the Senate Committee Inquiry into
Financial Technology and Regulatory
Technology and the Reserve Bank
of Australia’s Issues Paper on
payment system regulation. The
recommendations from the Senate
Committee Inquiry are due in 2020,
while the outcomes from the RBA
Issues Paper has been deferred to 2021.
AUSTRAC is still considering the
Independent Auditor’s report, and
we continue to fully cooperate with
the regulator.
Afterpay continues to proactively
engage with regulators in the US and
the UK to highlight its commitment to
consumer protection and responsibility
and compliance with applicable laws.
9
Fortifying the foundations
to deliver long term
shareholder value
In order to deliver long-term growth
Prior to the July 2020 capital raising,
to shareholders, we must continue
retail shareholders participated
to invest in our existing regions and
in another SPP that was announced
expedite our expansion into new
on 11 June 2019. This SPP was deferred
markets. A balance sheet that can
following the receipt of the notice from
support this investment is key, as it
AUSTRAC. The SPP was completed at
underpins the funding of our rapid
a price of $23 per share, which was the
growth in underlying sales and provides
same price at which shares were issued
the capacity to execute on potential
in a placement to institutional and
merger and acquisition opportunities.
professional investors in June 2019.
The Afterpay balance sheet was
The capital support from our
fortified in July 2020 by a fully
shareholder base demonstrates their
underwritten institutional placement
belief in the long term prospects of our
raising $650 million. The placement
business, and is further validation of
was complemented by a share
our differentiated business model.
purchase plan (SPP) that raised
approximately $136 million from
eligible Australian and New Zealand
retail investors. Shares in both the
placement and SPP were issued at $66.
Concurrent with the institutional
placement, the co-founders each sold
2.05 million shares, which equated
to 10% of their individual holdings
and 1.5% of total shares outstanding
in Afterpay. The founders remain
Afterpay’s largest shareholders.
The capital raising and sell down
was overseen by a sub-committee of
independent Non-Executive Directors.
The capital support from our
shareholder base demonstrates
their belief in the long term
prospects of our business,
and is further validation of our
differentiated business model.
11
Committed to good
Corporate Governance
As Afterpay has continued to grow
rapidly, so has our focus on corporate
governance. We understand that long
term sustainability relies on meeting
the governance expectations of our
stakeholders. In FY20 there was a
focus on delivering Board renewal
commitments and strengthening
our internal capabilities. The Board
continually reviews Afterpay’s
governance policies and practices to
ensure they are in line with corporate
Board Renewal
We were delighted to welcome three
new independent non-executive
Directors to the Afterpay Board
in FY20. Gary Briggs (January 2020)
and Sharon Rothstein (June 2020) are
based in the US. Pat O’Sullivan (March
2020) is based in Australia and is the
Chair of the Audit, Risk & Compliance
Committee. Cliff Rosenberg retired
from the Board in May 2020.
governance expectations and
The renewed majority independent
developments. Afterpay has reviewed
Board is a highly accomplished
its corporate governance framework
team that provides a diverse range
against the 4th edition of the ASX
of views and experience to support
Principles and Recommendations
the management team in setting the
and will be reporting against the 4th
strategic direction of the business.
edition for the financial year ending
Having Directors with global
30 June 2021.
10
knowledge and relationships across
the core functions of our business
is extremely valuable.
On behalf of the Board, I would like
to take this opportunity to thank Cliff
for his significant contribution to the
business and the Board. Cliff has had
a long association with Afterpay and
remains a major supporter of our
future prospects.
Fortifying the foundations
to deliver long term
shareholder value
In order to deliver long-term growth
Prior to the July 2020 capital raising,
to shareholders, we must continue
retail shareholders participated
to invest in our existing regions and
in another SPP that was announced
expedite our expansion into new
on 11 June 2019. This SPP was deferred
markets. A balance sheet that can
following the receipt of the notice from
support this investment is key, as it
AUSTRAC. The SPP was completed at
underpins the funding of our rapid
a price of $23 per share, which was the
growth in underlying sales and provides
same price at which shares were issued
the capacity to execute on potential
in a placement to institutional and
merger and acquisition opportunities.
professional investors in June 2019.
The Afterpay balance sheet was
The capital support from our
fortified in July 2020 by a fully
shareholder base demonstrates their
underwritten institutional placement
belief in the long term prospects of our
raising $650 million. The placement
business, and is further validation of
was complemented by a share
our differentiated business model.
purchase plan (SPP) that raised
approximately $136 million from
eligible Australian and New Zealand
retail investors. Shares in both the
placement and SPP were issued at $66.
Concurrent with the institutional
placement, the co-founders each sold
2.05 million shares, which equated
to 10% of their individual holdings
and 1.5% of total shares outstanding
in Afterpay. The founders remain
Afterpay’s largest shareholders.
The capital raising and sell down
was overseen by a sub-committee of
independent Non-Executive Directors.
The capital support from our
shareholder base demonstrates
their belief in the long term
prospects of our business,
and is further validation of our
differentiated business model.
Committed to good
Corporate Governance
As Afterpay has continued to grow
rapidly, so has our focus on corporate
governance. We understand that long
term sustainability relies on meeting
the governance expectations of our
stakeholders. In FY20 there was a
focus on delivering Board renewal
commitments and strengthening
our internal capabilities. The Board
continually reviews Afterpay’s
governance policies and practices to
ensure they are in line with corporate
Board Renewal
We were delighted to welcome three
new independent non-executive
Directors to the Afterpay Board
in FY20. Gary Briggs (January 2020)
and Sharon Rothstein (June 2020) are
based in the US. Pat O’Sullivan (March
2020) is based in Australia and is the
Chair of the Audit, Risk & Compliance
Committee. Cliff Rosenberg retired
from the Board in May 2020.
governance expectations and
The renewed majority independent
developments. Afterpay has reviewed
Board is a highly accomplished
its corporate governance framework
team that provides a diverse range
against the 4th edition of the ASX
of views and experience to support
Principles and Recommendations
the management team in setting the
and will be reporting against the 4th
strategic direction of the business.
edition for the financial year ending
Having Directors with global
30 June 2021.
knowledge and relationships across
the core functions of our business
is extremely valuable.
On behalf of the Board, I would like
to take this opportunity to thank Cliff
for his significant contribution to the
business and the Board. Cliff has had
a long association with Afterpay and
remains a major supporter of our
future prospects.
10
11
Acknowledging
all who contribute
to our success
My decision to formally take on the
role of Chair of Afterpay was made easy
by the people who are part of our world
class business. It is a privilege to take
on this important role and I am excited
to continue on this challenging, but
very rewarding journey.
None of what we have achieved would
be possible without the hard work
and dedication of the Afterpay team.
On behalf of the Board, I would like
to thank the founders, management
team and all employees for their
continued focus and dedication
through what has been a very
challenging year. I would also like
to acknowledge my fellow Board
members, old and new, for the time
they dedicate to our business and the
passion they share with the team.
Lastly and importantly, I would like
to take this opportunity to thank you,
our Afterpay shareholders for your
ongoing support and belief in our
ability to deliver long-term value to you,
and to achieve our mission to power
an economy in which everyone wins.
Elana Rubin
Independent Chair
Afterpay
12
Our FY20 achievements are a
testament to the amazing team
at Afterpay. The commitment
and passion of our employees
is reflected in the successful
execution of our strategy over
the past five years.
Acknowledging
all who contribute
to our success
My decision to formally take on the
role of Chair of Afterpay was made easy
by the people who are part of our world
class business. It is a privilege to take
on this important role and I am excited
to continue on this challenging, but
very rewarding journey.
None of what we have achieved would
be possible without the hard work
and dedication of the Afterpay team.
On behalf of the Board, I would like
to thank the founders, management
team and all employees for their
continued focus and dedication
through what has been a very
challenging year. I would also like
to acknowledge my fellow Board
members, old and new, for the time
they dedicate to our business and the
passion they share with the team.
Lastly and importantly, I would like
to take this opportunity to thank you,
our Afterpay shareholders for your
ongoing support and belief in our
ability to deliver long-term value to you,
and to achieve our mission to power
an economy in which everyone wins.
Elana Rubin
Independent Chair
Afterpay
12
Our FY20 achievements are a
testament to the amazing team
at Afterpay. The commitment
and passion of our employees
is reflected in the successful
execution of our strategy over
the past five years.
Message from the CEO
Dear fellow shareholders
The past 12 months has seen an accelerated
movement away from traditional credit and a shift to
online shopping. It has also been a year of continued
growth and expansion across our regions, despite
the challenges we have faced with COVID-19.
Our incredible team of over 650 people,
Our brand
not only transitioned seamlessly to
working from home during COVID-19,
they continued to work passionately to
help deliver the best for our customers
Grow
Innovate
Perform
and merchants. Our priority has been,
Do the right thing
and will continue to be, taking care
of our people above all else.
During the past year, the leadership
team has evaluated what long-term
success looks like for our business.
As we evolve with our customers,
merchants and stakeholders towards
a retail landscape that is increasingly
driven by e-commerce, we have
redefined our vision to reflect this shift.
Our next chapter will see this vision
Our Brand
Our renewed brand enables us to
more accurately reflect who our
customers are and why they choose
Afterpay. Our brand symbolises our
evolution. It’s defined by our vision, our
mission and our values. It represents
where we came from, and where we
come to life.
are heading.
With a focus on millennials and
Gen Z, we have redefined our vision
that aspires to fairness and financial
freedom for all – this is the world we
want to see. Our mission is to power
an economy in which everyone
wins – we will look to evolve in a way
that delivers a “win/win” for all of our
stakeholders.
Our values are reflective of the mindset
we encourage our employees to have
as we execute our strategy.
Our brand provides a platform that
allows us to clearly articulate who
we are and what we do. It captures
and celebrates the value we deliver
to merchants and customers. We
strive to influence better behaviours
by empowering people and seeking
a “win/win” for everyone.
Our mission provides us with
a north star and our values help us
navigate our future – one in which
we can continue to build a leading
We have the right strategy and we’re
company, driven by the success
evolving our priorities in FY21. We will
of all our stakeholders.
deliver our next chapter through:
14
Millennials at our core
With a focus on millennials and Gen Z,
we have redefined our vision that aspires
to fairness and financial freedom for all.
Underlying Sales
$11.1b
Up 112% on FY19
Active Customers
9.9 million
Up 116% on FY19
Active Merchants
55.4k
Up 72% on FY19
GrowGrowth has remained a key focus throughout FY20. Our global expansion has seen strong growth across all our markets and our key metrics of underlying sales, customers and merchants all performed extremely well.Pivotal milestones have been achieved – the US celebrated 5 million active customers within two years, and our UK team reached 1 million active customers in their first full financial year.In ANZ, new verticals were launched and key new merchants (now live or in the process of integrating), include: Qantas Frequent Flyer, eBay, Ticketek, Webjet, Chemist Warehouse and Priceline.Notwithstanding the challenges of COVID-19, we launched in-store with selected retail stores in the US. I am proud of the team and the support we could provide our merchant partners as they gradually re-opened for their customers.Merchant acceptance continues to be the ultimate driver of customer acquisition and, as we continue to expand into new markets, this will deepen our major enterprise merchant partnerships.We are now live in Canada with a small number of merchants in testing and initial launch phase. We have a strong pipeline and we’re building on our talented team in the US to drive growth in this new North American market. Preparations have also commenced to launch in Europe and Asia.InnovateThrough innovation, we will leverage our pay-in-four product to expand our differentiated value proposition, which ultimately drives value for merchants and customers through product enhancement.Innovation continues to be at the forefront of the service we offer.We have a strong product and innovation roadmap, reflecting feedback from our customers and merchants. Listening is how we ensure we are evolving with their expectations and needs in mind.In July 2020, we launched in the US our one-of-a-kind loyalty program, called Pulse, rewarding our customers who use Afterpay in a responsible way. ANZ and UK launches will follow. Pulse is the only mass market program of its kind, incentivising customers to make payments on time and rewarding them for it.We successfully launched a virtual in-store card in the US with Apple Pay and Google Pay. Apple Pay was also rolled out as a repayment method for customers globally, providing more options to purchase items in a way that suits their lifestyle.Our team is absolutely passionate about building innovative products that align with our vision and mission, and creates value that meets the needs of our customers.PulsePerformWe delivered a solid set of results in FY20 and I want to thank our incredible team – without them, we wouldn’t have realised these achievements.We achieved strong Underlying Sales and income growth was matched by strong margin performance in FY20.Our Group Total Income of $519.2m, 97% higher than FY19, was driven by strong performance of the Afterpay business which delivered income of $502.7m, 103% higher than FY19. We sustained merchant margins at 3.9% of underlying sales, supported by a growing number of SMB’s joining the platform.We achieved historically low loss rates with Gross Loss at 0.9% of Underlying Sales. Net Transaction Loss (NTL) of 0.4% was in line with FY19, with the benefit of lower Gross Loss offsetting a decreasing contribution from Late Fees.Afterpay Net Transaction Margin (NTM) as a percentage of Underlying Sales remained strong at 2.3% despite lower contribution from Late Fees and an increasing contribution from earlier life-cycle, initially lower-margin, international markets.Our EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) of $44.4m, up 73% on FY19, was driven by growth in Underlying Sales, income and NTM.While global trading and capital market conditions remain uncertain during this period, our already strong balance sheet and liquidity position was further enhanced by a successful capital raise in July 2020 which delivered net proceeds of $769.8m. Inclusive of the net proceeds of the capital raising, Afterpay has an extremely strong balance sheet position with over $1.3b of cash and over $2b of combined pro forma liquidity and growth capacity. The combined pro forma liquidity and growth capacity position can fund in excess of $30b in annualised underlying sales above the current run-rate of over $15b. This excludes additional liquidity that may be created by increasing existing or new debt warehouse facilities.15Message from the CEO
Dear fellow shareholders
The past 12 months has seen an accelerated
movement away from traditional credit and a shift to
online shopping. It has also been a year of continued
growth and expansion across our regions, despite
the challenges we have faced with COVID-19.
Our incredible team of over 650 people,
Our brand
not only transitioned seamlessly to
working from home during COVID-19,
they continued to work passionately to
help deliver the best for our customers
Grow
Innovate
Perform
and merchants. Our priority has been,
Do the right thing
and will continue to be, taking care
of our people above all else.
During the past year, the leadership
team has evaluated what long-term
success looks like for our business.
As we evolve with our customers,
merchants and stakeholders towards
a retail landscape that is increasingly
driven by e-commerce, we have
redefined our vision to reflect this shift.
Our next chapter will see this vision
Our Brand
Our renewed brand enables us to
more accurately reflect who our
customers are and why they choose
Afterpay. Our brand symbolises our
evolution. It’s defined by our vision, our
mission and our values. It represents
where we came from, and where we
come to life.
are heading.
With a focus on millennials and
Gen Z, we have redefined our vision
that aspires to fairness and financial
freedom for all – this is the world we
want to see. Our mission is to power
an economy in which everyone
wins – we will look to evolve in a way
that delivers a “win/win” for all of our
stakeholders.
Our values are reflective of the mindset
we encourage our employees to have
as we execute our strategy.
Our brand provides a platform that
allows us to clearly articulate who
we are and what we do. It captures
and celebrates the value we deliver
to merchants and customers. We
strive to influence better behaviours
by empowering people and seeking
a “win/win” for everyone.
Our mission provides us with
a north star and our values help us
navigate our future – one in which
we can continue to build a leading
We have the right strategy and we’re
company, driven by the success
evolving our priorities in FY21. We will
of all our stakeholders.
deliver our next chapter through:
14
Millennials at our core
With a focus on millennials and Gen Z,
we have redefined our vision that aspires
to fairness and financial freedom for all.
Underlying Sales
$11.1b
Up 112% on FY19
Active Customers
9.9 million
Up 116% on FY19
Active Merchants
55.4k
Up 72% on FY19
GrowGrowth has remained a key focus throughout FY20. Our global expansion has seen strong growth across all our markets and our key metrics of underlying sales, customers and merchants all performed extremely well.Pivotal milestones have been achieved – the US celebrated 5 million active customers within two years, and our UK team reached 1 million active customers in their first full financial year.In ANZ, new verticals were launched and key new merchants (now live or in the process of integrating), include: Qantas Frequent Flyer, eBay, Ticketek, Webjet, Chemist Warehouse and Priceline.Notwithstanding the challenges of COVID-19, we launched in-store with selected retail stores in the US. I am proud of the team and the support we could provide our merchant partners as they gradually re-opened for their customers.Merchant acceptance continues to be the ultimate driver of customer acquisition and, as we continue to expand into new markets, this will deepen our major enterprise merchant partnerships.We are now live in Canada with a small number of merchants in testing and initial launch phase. We have a strong pipeline and we’re building on our talented team in the US to drive growth in this new North American market. Preparations have also commenced to launch in Europe and Asia.InnovateThrough innovation, we will leverage our pay-in-four product to expand our differentiated value proposition, which ultimately drives value for merchants and customers through product enhancement.Innovation continues to be at the forefront of the service we offer.We have a strong product and innovation roadmap, reflecting feedback from our customers and merchants. Listening is how we ensure we are evolving with their expectations and needs in mind.In July 2020, we launched in the US our one-of-a-kind loyalty program, called Pulse, rewarding our customers who use Afterpay in a responsible way. ANZ and UK launches will follow. Pulse is the only mass market program of its kind, incentivising customers to make payments on time and rewarding them for it.We successfully launched a virtual in-store card in the US with Apple Pay and Google Pay. Apple Pay was also rolled out as a repayment method for customers globally, providing more options to purchase items in a way that suits their lifestyle.Our team is absolutely passionate about building innovative products that align with our vision and mission, and creates value that meets the needs of our customers.PulsePerformWe delivered a solid set of results in FY20 and I want to thank our incredible team – without them, we wouldn’t have realised these achievements.We achieved strong Underlying Sales and income growth was matched by strong margin performance in FY20.Our Group Total Income of $519.2m, 97% higher than FY19, was driven by strong performance of the Afterpay business which delivered income of $502.7m, 103% higher than FY19. We sustained merchant margins at 3.9% of underlying sales, supported by a growing number of SMB’s joining the platform.We achieved historically low loss rates with Gross Loss at 0.9% of Underlying Sales. Net Transaction Loss (NTL) of 0.4% was in line with FY19, with the benefit of lower Gross Loss offsetting a decreasing contribution from Late Fees.Afterpay Net Transaction Margin (NTM) as a percentage of Underlying Sales remained strong at 2.3% despite lower contribution from Late Fees and an increasing contribution from earlier life-cycle, initially lower-margin, international markets.Our EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) of $44.4m, up 73% on FY19, was driven by growth in Underlying Sales, income and NTM.While global trading and capital market conditions remain uncertain during this period, our already strong balance sheet and liquidity position was further enhanced by a successful capital raise in July 2020 which delivered net proceeds of $769.8m. Inclusive of the net proceeds of the capital raising, Afterpay has an extremely strong balance sheet position with over $1.3b of cash and over $2b of combined pro forma liquidity and growth capacity. The combined pro forma liquidity and growth capacity position can fund in excess of $30b in annualised underlying sales above the current run-rate of over $15b. This excludes additional liquidity that may be created by increasing existing or new debt warehouse facilities.15Our people are
focused and
committed to doing
the right thing – it
underpins everything
we do. It’s the reason
we exist.
17
17
Do the right thingOur people are focused and committed to doing the right thing – it underpins everything we do. It’s the reason we exist.It’s because of our global team that we delivered another year of solid results. The level of integrity and passion with which they did this is what I am most proud of.While a lot has changed in the five years since the company began, Afterpay’s core principles and purposefully different model remain, and continue to resonate with customers around the world.Our purposefully different approach and appeal to customers who want a budgeting tool is reflected in the fact that average outstanding balances have remained consistently low across the portfolio ($190), notwithstanding frequency has increased significantly over time and that approximately 90% of customers use a debit card on the Afterpay platform.As we continue to grow and mature, how we contribute to society is extremely important. We are committed to leading and educating consumers about financial wellbeing as we work towards our mission to power an economy in which everyone wins.The past 12 months we have seen our communities tested during particularly trying times. From the bushfires in Australia to the global COVID-19 pandemic, this has not only truly tested our business model but also how we support our communities during challenging circumstances.Shaping the futureI feel so privileged to be leading the Afterpay team. There is no doubt that the success we have seen is thanks to them and the passion they bring to Afterpay every single day. On behalf of Nick Molnar and the leadership team, I would like to say thank you.Thank you to our Board and leadership team for their support and guidance. It’s invaluable as we continue to scale and grow.I would also like to thank our customers and merchant partners, as well as our investors. You are such an integral part of our success and growth, and we are grateful for your loyalty and trust.Our future is exciting. Our achievements over the past five years have set the foundation for the successes to come.We have aspirational goals and a talented team ready to achieve them. We are committed to seeing a world of fairness and financial freedom for all. We will continue to work hard every day as we move towards our mission – to power an economy in which everyone wins.Anthony Eisen CEO & Managing Director AfterpayOur team supported our small-to-medium business partners through introducing Afterpay Access – a new one-stop-shop for small businesses that offers resource tools, and expert advice on how to grow during this challenging period and beyond.We partnered with charities in each region to help raise awareness and funds. One initiative we launched was our ‘Add $1 / £1’ at the checkout with the funds going directly to partner charities.We have also continued to attract global talent across our regions. We welcomed David Katz (Chief Product Officer), Geoff Seeley (Chief Marketing Officer), Cassandra Williams (Chief Enterprise Risk Officer), Marie Festa (Executive Vice President, Investor Relations and Communications) and Lee Hatton (Executive Vice President, New Platforms).Our team is absolutely passionateabout building innovative products that align with our vision and mission, and creates value that meets the needs of our customers.16Our people are
focused and
committed to doing
the right thing – it
underpins everything
we do. It’s the reason
we exist.
17
17
Do the right thingOur people are focused and committed to doing the right thing – it underpins everything we do. It’s the reason we exist.It’s because of our global team that we delivered another year of solid results. The level of integrity and passion with which they did this is what I am most proud of.While a lot has changed in the five years since the company began, Afterpay’s core principles and purposefully different model remain, and continue to resonate with customers around the world.Our purposefully different approach and appeal to customers who want a budgeting tool is reflected in the fact that average outstanding balances have remained consistently low across the portfolio ($190), notwithstanding frequency has increased significantly over time and that approximately 90% of customers use a debit card on the Afterpay platform.As we continue to grow and mature, how we contribute to society is extremely important. We are committed to leading and educating consumers about financial wellbeing as we work towards our mission to power an economy in which everyone wins.The past 12 months we have seen our communities tested during particularly trying times. From the bushfires in Australia to the global COVID-19 pandemic, this has not only truly tested our business model but also how we support our communities during challenging circumstances.Shaping the futureI feel so privileged to be leading the Afterpay team. There is no doubt that the success we have seen is thanks to them and the passion they bring to Afterpay every single day. On behalf of Nick Molnar and the leadership team, I would like to say thank you.Thank you to our Board and leadership team for their support and guidance. It’s invaluable as we continue to scale and grow.I would also like to thank our customers and merchant partners, as well as our investors. You are such an integral part of our success and growth, and we are grateful for your loyalty and trust.Our future is exciting. Our achievements over the past five years have set the foundation for the successes to come.We have aspirational goals and a talented team ready to achieve them. We are committed to seeing a world of fairness and financial freedom for all. We will continue to work hard every day as we move towards our mission – to power an economy in which everyone wins.Anthony Eisen CEO & Managing Director AfterpayOur team supported our small-to-medium business partners through introducing Afterpay Access – a new one-stop-shop for small businesses that offers resource tools, and expert advice on how to grow during this challenging period and beyond.We partnered with charities in each region to help raise awareness and funds. One initiative we launched was our ‘Add $1 / £1’ at the checkout with the funds going directly to partner charities.We have also continued to attract global talent across our regions. We welcomed David Katz (Chief Product Officer), Geoff Seeley (Chief Marketing Officer), Cassandra Williams (Chief Enterprise Risk Officer), Marie Festa (Executive Vice President, Investor Relations and Communications) and Lee Hatton (Executive Vice President, New Platforms).Our team is absolutely passionateabout building innovative products that align with our vision and mission, and creates value that meets the needs of our customers.16Our Vision (the world we want to see)
Fairness and
Financial Freedom
for all
Our Mission (Our role in achieving our vision)
To power an economy
in which everyone wins
Our Strategy
Our Values
Be Brave
Keep it Real
Do the Right Thing
Shape the Future
Brand
Grow
Innovate
Perform
Do the
Right
Thing
Sustainability
Looking after employees
The health and wellbeing
of our team is always
front of mind for our
leadership team.
Do the
Right Thing
Sustainability
Caring for
our people
It’s our team who have made us who
We keep our teams connected through
we are and the success we have seen.
Global All Hands, where our teams
Over the past 12 months we have
hear from our leaders and have the
grown from 447 to ~650 employees.
opportunity to ask questions that are
Through the challenges we faced
and continue to face during COVID-19
we have, and always will take care of
our people above all else. Our team
transitioned seamlessly to working
from home and, through a Culture
important to them. Further building
a listening culture is absolutely critical
as we evolve and grow. We will always
seek feedback and commit to fostering
an open and transparent culture.
As we enter our next chapter, our team
Amp Survey we conducted in the first
and the culture at Afterpay is more
few weeks, 94% of our team told us
important than ever.
they felt supported and informed.
The health and wellbeing of our
Through our new values – Be Brave,
Keep it Real, Do the Right Thing and
team is always front of mind for our
Shape the Future – we will drive the
leadership team. Initiatives such as
right behaviours in how we work
Mental Health First Aid training and
together and the decisions we make
to deliver a sustainable business.
our Employee Assistance Program
have been communicated broadly
to our team. We will continue to
provide resources and listen to ensure
our people are supported in the best
way we can.
> 650
employees
8 cities
Over the past 12 months
we have grown from 447
to over 650 employees
Through the
challenges we
faced and continue
to face during
COVID-19 we have,
and always will take
care of our people
above all else.
19
Sustainability
Looking after employees
The health and wellbeing
of our team is always
front of mind for our
leadership team.
Do the
Right Thing
Sustainability
Our Vision (the world we want to see)
Fairness and
Financial Freedom
for all
Our Mission (Our role in achieving our vision)
To power an economy
in which everyone wins
Our Values
Be Brave
Keep it Real
Do the Right Thing
Shape the Future
Our Strategy
Brand
Grow
Innovate
Perform
Do the
Right
Thing
Caring for
our people
It’s our team who have made us who
We keep our teams connected through
we are and the success we have seen.
Global All Hands, where our teams
Over the past 12 months we have
hear from our leaders and have the
grown from 447 to ~650 employees.
opportunity to ask questions that are
Through the challenges we faced
and continue to face during COVID-19
we have, and always will take care of
our people above all else. Our team
transitioned seamlessly to working
from home and, through a Culture
important to them. Further building
a listening culture is absolutely critical
as we evolve and grow. We will always
seek feedback and commit to fostering
an open and transparent culture.
As we enter our next chapter, our team
Amp Survey we conducted in the first
and the culture at Afterpay is more
few weeks, 94% of our team told us
important than ever.
they felt supported and informed.
The health and wellbeing of our
Through our new values – Be Brave,
Keep it Real, Do the Right Thing and
team is always front of mind for our
Shape the Future – we will drive the
leadership team. Initiatives such as
right behaviours in how we work
Mental Health First Aid training and
together and the decisions we make
our Employee Assistance Program
have been communicated broadly
to our team. We will continue to
provide resources and listen to ensure
our people are supported in the best
way we can.
to deliver a sustainable business.
> 650
employees
8 cities
Over the past 12 months
we have grown from 447
to over 650 employees
Through the
challenges we
faced and continue
to face during
COVID-19 we have,
and always will take
care of our people
above all else.
19
Throughout June it was Pride Month
Even though we couldn’t march in the streets
like we did last year, our Pride Community
at Afterpay still made sure we celebrated.
As we shape the future our focus will
In May this year, we were horrified
be on:
• Enhancing our recruitment
processes to ensure we are attracting
candidates from the widest pool of
people with diverse backgrounds,
experiences, skills and perspectives.
• Achieving gender targets of 40,40,20
for Directors and senior management
by FY23
• Understanding the baseline of our
diversity across our global team and
develop action plans and groups
to address the areas where we need
to focus
by the racial injustice experienced
in the US and supported the rise
of the Black Lives Matter movement
that rightfully gained global attention.
Led by our US team, Anthony Eisen
and Nick Molnar had the privilege
of joining a listening session with the
team to not only grieve what had
happened but to listen, to understand,
and to learn about experiences related
to racism and bias. Our team also led
a social media campaign to promote
and support Black-owned businesses.
This movement also forced us to
reflect on the injustices that occur
• Educating our leaders through
in Australia’s Indigenous communities
training to ensure they are equipped
and how we can play a part in raising
and can role model the changes
greater awareness.
we want to see
Throughout June it was Pride Month,
Our team has made some good
and even though we couldn’t march
progress on gender diversity.
in the streets like we did last year,
Gender balance remained a key focus
across the business in FY20. This year
we welcomed Lee Hatton, Cassandra
Williams and Marie Festa to our Global
Leadership team, which is now made
up of 40% women.
Across our regions we celebrated
International Women’s Day by hearing
stories from our team across all levels
of what equality means to them.
We shared our commitments and
our Pride Community at Afterpay still
made sure we celebrated. The team
had a Virtual LGBT History Experience,
developed a social media campaign
around the theme of hopefulness and
resilience, and developed a Global
Pride Employee Newsletter.
We know we have more to do, but
with our team, we will be a better
company and support a better society
through a more diverse and inclusive
ideas on how we can drive even greater
work environment.
equality across our teams.
Diversity and
Inclusion
Afterpay is a fast paced and dynamic
organisation that knows diversity
of thought and an inclusive culture
are at the heart of innovation.
Building a diverse and inclusive
culture is not only the right thing to
do but it also makes business sense.
Diversity means bringing different
insights and perspectives to help drive
sustainable growth.
This year we developed a new Diversity
and Inclusion Policy which outlines
our commitments. At the core, we are
about building and fostering a safe and
supportive culture, where individuals
feel confident and comfortable to be
who they are.
It’s important that our team reflects
the diversity of our customers and the
communities in which we operate.
As we continue to embed diversity and
inclusion into our DNA, the Afterpay
leadership team is committed to the
following strategy:
Grow: We will attract, retain and
develop a pipeline of talent from the
widest pool of people, who will bring
with them diverse backgrounds,
experiences, skills and perspectives
Perform: We will embed the
importance of Diversity and Inclusion
within our culture by encouraging
a commitment to inclusion by leaders
at all levels
Innovate: We will build innovation
through fostering our team’s diversity
of thought, skills and experience
Do the right thing: We will embrace,
role model and encourage our team
members to balance their work and
life commitments by building a holistic
flexible working culture
20
Caring for our communitiesFY20 was no doubt a year of challenges, including devastating bushfires in Australia and a global pandemic unlike anything we have ever experienced in our lifetime.During the Australian Summer, Australia witnessed devastating fires across the country. We are incredibly proud that our team supported the bushfire appeal through donating $250,000, with our customers, to the Red Cross Bushfire Appeal. We also provided hardship relief for affected customers and support for impacted merchants. COVID-19 created uncertainty for many in the community, especially our small-to-medium business partners (SMBs).Through our merchant partners we understand that running a SMB can be fulfilling and stimulating, but also challenging, even without the disruption of COVID-19.To help our SMB community we introduced Afterpay Access – a new one-stop-shop for small businesses that offers resource tools, and expert advice on how to grow during this challenging period and beyond.Our team also provide support such as:• Launching campaigns such as Afterpay Connect and Support Small, to showcase and connect small businesses with millions of Afterpay customers• Providing a suite of offers and online ‘how to guides’ to help SMBs efficiently and effectively move to online transactionsIn May, we partnered with five incredible charity partners in each of our regions – Thread Together in Australia, Dress for Success in New Zealand, Baby2Baby and Common Thread in the US, and NHS Charities Together in the UK.Our aim was to help make a difference to those who needed it, especially during these challenging times.“Thread Together is thrilled to be partnering with Afterpay. Afterpay’s support will go a long way in supporting Thread Together’s recent bushfire and COVID-19 relief efforts.Future contributions from Afterpay’s customers will help us even more as we continue to provide new clothing, a basic human right, to some of the most vulnerable families across the country during this very challenging time.”Anthony Chesler CEO, Thread TogetherCampaigns such as Afterpay Connect and Support Small showcase and connect small businesses with millions of Afterpay customers.One of the initiatives we launched was “Add $1 / £1 at the checkout”, which provided our customers the option to add $1 / £1 at checkout, with the funds going directly to the charities we have partnered with.Overall, our customers raised over $330,000 and our ‘at the checkout’ initiative has helped increase much needed awareness and support.21Throughout June it was Pride Month
Even though we couldn’t march in the streets
like we did last year, our Pride Community
at Afterpay still made sure we celebrated.
As we shape the future our focus will
In May this year, we were horrified
be on:
• Enhancing our recruitment
processes to ensure we are attracting
candidates from the widest pool of
people with diverse backgrounds,
experiences, skills and perspectives.
• Achieving gender targets of 40,40,20
for Directors and senior management
by FY23
• Understanding the baseline of our
diversity across our global team and
develop action plans and groups
to address the areas where we need
to focus
by the racial injustice experienced
in the US and supported the rise
of the Black Lives Matter movement
that rightfully gained global attention.
Led by our US team, Anthony Eisen
and Nick Molnar had the privilege
of joining a listening session with the
team to not only grieve what had
happened but to listen, to understand,
and to learn about experiences related
to racism and bias. Our team also led
a social media campaign to promote
and support Black-owned businesses.
This movement also forced us to
reflect on the injustices that occur
• Educating our leaders through
in Australia’s Indigenous communities
training to ensure they are equipped
and how we can play a part in raising
and can role model the changes
greater awareness.
we want to see
Throughout June it was Pride Month,
Our team has made some good
and even though we couldn’t march
progress on gender diversity.
in the streets like we did last year,
Gender balance remained a key focus
across the business in FY20. This year
we welcomed Lee Hatton, Cassandra
Williams and Marie Festa to our Global
Leadership team, which is now made
up of 40% women.
Across our regions we celebrated
International Women’s Day by hearing
stories from our team across all levels
of what equality means to them.
We shared our commitments and
our Pride Community at Afterpay still
made sure we celebrated. The team
had a Virtual LGBT History Experience,
developed a social media campaign
around the theme of hopefulness and
resilience, and developed a Global
Pride Employee Newsletter.
We know we have more to do, but
with our team, we will be a better
company and support a better society
through a more diverse and inclusive
ideas on how we can drive even greater
work environment.
equality across our teams.
Diversity and
Inclusion
Afterpay is a fast paced and dynamic
organisation that knows diversity
of thought and an inclusive culture
are at the heart of innovation.
Building a diverse and inclusive
culture is not only the right thing to
do but it also makes business sense.
Diversity means bringing different
insights and perspectives to help drive
sustainable growth.
This year we developed a new Diversity
and Inclusion Policy which outlines
our commitments. At the core, we are
about building and fostering a safe and
supportive culture, where individuals
feel confident and comfortable to be
who they are.
It’s important that our team reflects
the diversity of our customers and the
communities in which we operate.
As we continue to embed diversity and
inclusion into our DNA, the Afterpay
leadership team is committed to the
following strategy:
Grow: We will attract, retain and
develop a pipeline of talent from the
widest pool of people, who will bring
with them diverse backgrounds,
experiences, skills and perspectives
Perform: We will embed the
importance of Diversity and Inclusion
within our culture by encouraging
a commitment to inclusion by leaders
at all levels
Innovate: We will build innovation
through fostering our team’s diversity
of thought, skills and experience
Do the right thing: We will embrace,
role model and encourage our team
members to balance their work and
life commitments by building a holistic
flexible working culture
20
Caring for our communitiesFY20 was no doubt a year of challenges, including devastating bushfires in Australia and a global pandemic unlike anything we have ever experienced in our lifetime.During the Australian Summer, Australia witnessed devastating fires across the country. We are incredibly proud that our team supported the bushfire appeal through donating $250,000, with our customers, to the Red Cross Bushfire Appeal. We also provided hardship relief for affected customers and support for impacted merchants. COVID-19 created uncertainty for many in the community, especially our small-to-medium business partners (SMBs).Through our merchant partners we understand that running a SMB can be fulfilling and stimulating, but also challenging, even without the disruption of COVID-19.To help our SMB community we introduced Afterpay Access – a new one-stop-shop for small businesses that offers resource tools, and expert advice on how to grow during this challenging period and beyond.Our team also provide support such as:• Launching campaigns such as Afterpay Connect and Support Small, to showcase and connect small businesses with millions of Afterpay customers• Providing a suite of offers and online ‘how to guides’ to help SMBs efficiently and effectively move to online transactionsIn May, we partnered with five incredible charity partners in each of our regions – Thread Together in Australia, Dress for Success in New Zealand, Baby2Baby and Common Thread in the US, and NHS Charities Together in the UK.Our aim was to help make a difference to those who needed it, especially during these challenging times.“Thread Together is thrilled to be partnering with Afterpay. Afterpay’s support will go a long way in supporting Thread Together’s recent bushfire and COVID-19 relief efforts.Future contributions from Afterpay’s customers will help us even more as we continue to provide new clothing, a basic human right, to some of the most vulnerable families across the country during this very challenging time.”Anthony Chesler CEO, Thread TogetherCampaigns such as Afterpay Connect and Support Small showcase and connect small businesses with millions of Afterpay customers.One of the initiatives we launched was “Add $1 / £1 at the checkout”, which provided our customers the option to add $1 / £1 at checkout, with the funds going directly to the charities we have partnered with.Overall, our customers raised over $330,000 and our ‘at the checkout’ initiative has helped increase much needed awareness and support.21Responsible spendingEnableAfterpay has created a budgeting tool that is free for customers to use if they pay on time. Our business model is purposefully designed to benefit from positive repayment behaviours and is not about extending credit to customers over long periods. Customers can purchase an item today and pay for it in four equal instalments every two weeks.We want our customers to spend responsibly and pay on time, so that they can use our service again for their next purchase.Our business modelNew customers with Afterpay start on low limits. Customer spending limits only increase with proven positive repayment behaviour over time. Afterpay never charges interest, our late fees are low and capped, and we pause our service as soon as a customer misses a payment.Afterpay has built a successful model without the need for credit checks. Over half our customers do not have established credit histories. Our proprietary algorithm has been tested against credit bureau data and validated that credit checks would not help Afterpay make better decisions.The traditional credit reporting system is designed to benefit lenders by helping them recover debts from customers. The threat of adverse credit listings is applied to customers that are behind in repayments.Afterpay instead manages its credit risk by suspending customers from spending more on our platform as soon as they miss a repayment. This prevents customers spiraling in debt and means they are more likely to be able to pay us back and continue using our service. It also means we can keep our overall losses lower.SupportAfterpay’s primary focus is to prevent consumers from experiencing financial hardship. We do not approve all customers that seek to use our platform and approve individual transactions in real time.Now more than ever, we also recognise that a person’s circumstances can change. Afterpay has a well-established, broad and generous hardship program, and our approach to hardship assistance goes above and beyond what is required by the law for traditional lenders.We immediately freeze late fees for customers in hardship, and we offer a range of short-term and longer term solutions, depending on individual circumstances. Our hardship program is easily accessible and, unlike the majority of other lenders, we do not require any documentary evidence from customers to support their hardship requests.We are committed to continual improvement and have engaged with Financial Counselling Australia (FCA) to help us further enhance our hardship program. While Afterpay received the highest rating among buy now pay later companies in the FCA’s July 2020 report on hardship1, we know we can do even better.RewardConsistent with our commitment to responsible spending, Afterpay has designed a rewards program called Pulse, that recognises customers who spend responsibly. Customers can unlock the rewards available under our Pulse program by demonstrating a continued series of on-time repayments.1. https://www.financialcounsellingaustralia.org.au/docs/rank-the-banks-and-other-creditors-2019/Our business modelNew customers with Afterpay start on low limits. Customer spending limits only increase with proven positive repayment behaviour over time.EnvironmentAfterpay is achieving carbon neutralityAfterpay is committed to environmental sustainability and recognises the direct impact that our business has on the environment.Afterpay’s direct impact on the environment is driven primarily by the physical offices we occupy around the world, the use of data centres to power our platform, and business travel. In 2020, we independently calculated our carbon footprint across our global operations. To achieve carbon neutrality, Afterpay is purchasing the necessary carbon credits to offset our emissions. We are currently working towards achieving certification from Climate Active.Afterpay recognises its broader impactAfterpay is a platform that connects consumers with merchants. We recognise the important role we have in understanding and influencing the indirect environmental impacts generated by our suppliers and retail supply chains.Afterpay has started to take steps to encourage greater awareness of ethical and sustainable fashion.We have started to empower our customers to make informed choices about fashion through a new partnership with Good On You, the world’s leading source for sustainable fashion brand ratings. Good On You uses expert analysis and proprietary technology to give each fashion brand an easy-to-understand score based on ethical and sustainable criteria. Afterpay’s Shop Directory, which sends around 14.5 million referrals to retailers every month, has a Shop Sustainably category that will be powered by Good On You. To help grow this category, and increase the number of merchants that have a Good On You rating, Afterpay has committed to providing Good On You with funding to review and rate additional labels.Through our partnership with Thread Together we are committed to helping vulnerable people who need clothing by addressing the problem of excess new fashion ending up as landfill. In 2020, Afterpay became Thread Together’s principal partner, and is committed to ensuring that Thread Together receives at least $200,000 per year.Like Afterpay, Thread Together is an Australian start-up with strong roots in fashion and is the only charity organisation in Australia whose mission and focus is to source new clothing from fashion retailers and redistribute items to those in our communities that need it most.Hundreds of Australian fashion retailers donate excess stock to Thread Together, including brands and partners of Afterpay, such as THE ICONIC, Bec + Bridge, P.E. Nation, Under Armour, Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Bendon Lingerie and Retail Apparel Group. This has resulted in tonnes of new clothing being diverted from landfill to date and cemented Thread Together’s role as the highest ethical response to the textile waste problem in Australia.The Afterpay shop directory, which sends14.5 millionreferrals to retailers every month1, has a Shop Sustainably category that will soon be poweredby Good On YouSustainable fashionAfterpay has started to take steps to encourage greater awareness of ethical and sustainable fashion.1. Based on Q4 FY2023Responsible spendingEnableAfterpay has created a budgeting tool that is free for customers to use if they pay on time. Our business model is purposefully designed to benefit from positive repayment behaviours and is not about extending credit to customers over long periods. Customers can purchase an item today and pay for it in four equal instalments every two weeks.We want our customers to spend responsibly and pay on time, so that they can use our service again for their next purchase.Our business modelNew customers with Afterpay start on low limits. Customer spending limits only increase with proven positive repayment behaviour over time. Afterpay never charges interest, our late fees are low and capped, and we pause our service as soon as a customer misses a payment.Afterpay has built a successful model without the need for credit checks. Over half our customers do not have established credit histories. Our proprietary algorithm has been tested against credit bureau data and validated that credit checks would not help Afterpay make better decisions.The traditional credit reporting system is designed to benefit lenders by helping them recover debts from customers. The threat of adverse credit listings is applied to customers that are behind in repayments.Afterpay instead manages its credit risk by suspending customers from spending more on our platform as soon as they miss a repayment. This prevents customers spiraling in debt and means they are more likely to be able to pay us back and continue using our service. It also means we can keep our overall losses lower.SupportAfterpay’s primary focus is to prevent consumers from experiencing financial hardship. We do not approve all customers that seek to use our platform and approve individual transactions in real time.Now more than ever, we also recognise that a person’s circumstances can change. Afterpay has a well-established, broad and generous hardship program, and our approach to hardship assistance goes above and beyond what is required by the law for traditional lenders.We immediately freeze late fees for customers in hardship, and we offer a range of short-term and longer term solutions, depending on individual circumstances. Our hardship program is easily accessible and, unlike the majority of other lenders, we do not require any documentary evidence from customers to support their hardship requests.We are committed to continual improvement and have engaged with Financial Counselling Australia (FCA) to help us further enhance our hardship program. While Afterpay received the highest rating among buy now pay later companies in the FCA’s July 2020 report on hardship1, we know we can do even better.RewardConsistent with our commitment to responsible spending, Afterpay has designed a rewards program called Pulse, that recognises customers who spend responsibly. Customers can unlock the rewards available under our Pulse program by demonstrating a continued series of on-time repayments.1. https://www.financialcounsellingaustralia.org.au/docs/rank-the-banks-and-other-creditors-2019/Our business modelNew customers with Afterpay start on low limits. Customer spending limits only increase with proven positive repayment behaviour over time.EnvironmentAfterpay is achieving carbon neutralityAfterpay is committed to environmental sustainability and recognises the direct impact that our business has on the environment.Afterpay’s direct impact on the environment is driven primarily by the physical offices we occupy around the world, the use of data centres to power our platform, and business travel. In 2020, we independently calculated our carbon footprint across our global operations. To achieve carbon neutrality, Afterpay is purchasing the necessary carbon credits to offset our emissions. We are currently working towards achieving certification from Climate Active.Afterpay recognises its broader impactAfterpay is a platform that connects consumers with merchants. We recognise the important role we have in understanding and influencing the indirect environmental impacts generated by our suppliers and retail supply chains.Afterpay has started to take steps to encourage greater awareness of ethical and sustainable fashion.We have started to empower our customers to make informed choices about fashion through a new partnership with Good On You, the world’s leading source for sustainable fashion brand ratings. Good On You uses expert analysis and proprietary technology to give each fashion brand an easy-to-understand score based on ethical and sustainable criteria. Afterpay’s Shop Directory, which sends around 14.5 million referrals to retailers every month, has a Shop Sustainably category that will be powered by Good On You. To help grow this category, and increase the number of merchants that have a Good On You rating, Afterpay has committed to providing Good On You with funding to review and rate additional labels.Through our partnership with Thread Together we are committed to helping vulnerable people who need clothing by addressing the problem of excess new fashion ending up as landfill. In 2020, Afterpay became Thread Together’s principal partner, and is committed to ensuring that Thread Together receives at least $200,000 per year.Like Afterpay, Thread Together is an Australian start-up with strong roots in fashion and is the only charity organisation in Australia whose mission and focus is to source new clothing from fashion retailers and redistribute items to those in our communities that need it most.Hundreds of Australian fashion retailers donate excess stock to Thread Together, including brands and partners of Afterpay, such as THE ICONIC, Bec + Bridge, P.E. Nation, Under Armour, Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Bendon Lingerie and Retail Apparel Group. This has resulted in tonnes of new clothing being diverted from landfill to date and cemented Thread Together’s role as the highest ethical response to the textile waste problem in Australia.The Afterpay shop directory, which sends14.5 millionreferrals to retailers every month1, has a Shop Sustainably category that will soon be poweredby Good On YouSustainable fashionAfterpay has started to take steps to encourage greater awareness of ethical and sustainable fashion.1. Based on Q4 FY2023Directors’ Report
Directors’
Report.
Afterpay has built
a successful model
without the need for
credit checks. Over
half our customers do
not have established
credit histories.
Directors’
Report.
Afterpay has built
a successful model
without the need for
credit checks. Over
half our customers do
not have established
credit histories.
Directors’ Report
The Directors submit their report on the consolidated entity consisting of Afterpay
Limited (Company) and the entities it controlled (Group) at the end of, or during, the
year ended 30 June 2020.
Directors
As at the date of this report, the Directors of Afterpay Limited are:
Elana Rubin
Chair, Independent Non-Executive Director
Anthony Eisen
Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director
Nick Molnar
Global Chief Revenue Officer and Executive Director
Gary Briggs
Independent Non-Executive Director
Pat O’Sullivan
Independent Non-Executive Director
Sharon Rothstein
Independent Non-Executive Director
Dana Stalder
Independent Non-Executive Director
The Directors listed above each held office as a Director of Afterpay Limited throughout
the period and until the date of this report, other than:
• Gary Briggs, who was appointed as a Director on 1 January 2020;
• Pat O’Sullivan, who was appointed as a Director on 1 March 2020; and
• Sharon Rothstein, who was appointed as a Director on 1 June 2020.
The following individuals were a Director of Afterpay Limited for a portion of the year:
• David Hancock, who ceased to be a Director on 8 October 2019; and
• Clifford Rosenberg, who ceased to be a Director on 24 May 2020.
Principal Activities
The principal activities of the Group are to provide technology-driven payments
solutions for customers and merchants through its Afterpay and Pay Now services and
businesses.
Financial Result
The Group reported a Statutory Loss After Tax of $22.9 million for the year ended
30 June 2020 (2019: $43.8 million).
26
Operating & Financial
Review
The year ended 30 June 2020 was a period of continued financial growth and
international expansion for the Group. Overall, in the year ended 30 June 2020, Afterpay:
• doubled Underlying Sales to $11.1 billion with increases achieved across all regions
•
•
•
increased Afterpay Income Margin to 3.9% of Underlying Sales, with a broadened
merchant portfolio
recorded historically low losses with Receivables Impairment Expense (Gross Loss) at
0.9% of Underlying Sales, through proactive risk management during a period of
increased economic uncertainty
sustained Net Transaction Margin at over 2% of Underlying Sales, despite increasing
contribution from newer markets which are initially lower margin
• accelerated investment in line with a publicly stated ambition to exceed $20 billion in
Underlying Sales by the end of FY22
•
strengthened an already strong balance sheet position, with the ability to fund over
$30 billion in incremental Underlying Sales over the current Underlying Sales run rate of
$15 billion (Q4 annualised).
The final months of the year were overshadowed by the effects of the COVID-19
pandemic on the economies in which Afterpay operates. Underlying Sales, Total
Income, and Net Transaction Margin continued to grow notwithstanding the broader
economic consequences of COVID-19, with the platform benefiting from a shift from
in-store to online spending and from cash payments to digital payments.
Strong growth matched by strong margin
performance, notwithstanding:
• increased contribution from less-mature
markets which are initially lower margin;
• materially lower late fees as a percentage of
Afterpay Total Income
27
1. Group Summary
Total Income was $519.2 million for the year ended 30 June 2020, up 97% on the prior
year driven by growth in Underlying Sales and an expanding merchant margin.
Net Transaction Margin (NTM) for Afterpay was $250.2 million, up 110% on the prior year,
increasing broadly in line with Underlying Sales due to an expanding merchant margin
and stable variable cost margins.
The Group achieved EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) of $44.4 million for the year
ended 30 June 2020, up $18.7 million on the prior year, driven by growth in NTM which
more than offset planned increased investment in Employment and Operating
Expenses to support Afterpay’s continued expansion.
Table 1
Summary Financial Results
For the year ended 30 June
Total Income
Cost of Sales
2020
$m
519.2
2019
$m
Change
$m
Change
%
264.1
255.0
97%
(134.3)
(59.6)
(74.7)
(125%)
Receivables Impairment Expenses
(94.5)
(58.7)
(35.8)
(61%)
Employment Expenses
(86.1)
(51.4)
(34.7)
(67%)
Operating Expenses1,2
(146.3)
(73.2)
(73.1)
(100%)
Afterpay Net Transaction Margin3
250.2
119.3
130.8
110%
EBITDA (excl. Significant Items)2,4
44.4
25.7
Loss before tax
Loss for the year
(26.8)
(42.8)
18.7
16.0
73%
37%
(22.9)
(43.8)
20.9
48%
1. Operating Expenses include one-off items of $6.4 million (2019: $7.5 million) and foreign currency (FX) gain of $19.9 million
(2019: $3.0 million) which are not included in the calculation of EBITDA (excluding Significant Items). One-off items relate to
international expansion costs, business combination, AUSTRAC-related costs, and other one-off gains or costs.
2. The Group adopted AASB 16 Leases from 1 July 2019 using the modified retrospective method and has not restated comparatives for
the prior year, as per the specific transitional provisions. EBITDA in the year ended 30 June 2020 is $5.6 million higher due to the
adoption of AASB 16 than it would have been under the previous accounting standard, AASB 117 Leases.
3. Net Transaction Margin is a non-IFRS measure that is not audited but is a key financial metric used by management.
4. EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure that is not audited but is a key financial metric used by management at a Group level. EBITDA
(excluding Significant Items) excludes foreign currency gains, share-based payment expenses, net loss on financial liabilities
at fair value, share of loss of associate and one-off items.
2. Afterpay Platform Key Drivers
The financial results of Afterpay are supported by a number of underlying drivers
including Underlying Sales, Active Customers, and Active Merchants. Afterpay tracks,
and periodically reports, on these drivers in its half year and full year results
announcements.
Table 2
Summary Platform Drivers
For the year ended 30 June
2020
2019
Change
Change %
Underlying Sales ($m)
11,114
5,247
5,867
Active Customers (millions)1
Active Merchants (‘000s)1
9.9
55.4
4.6
32.3
5.3
23.1
112%
116%
72%
1. Active is defined as having transacted at least once in the last 12 months.
28
2.1 Underlying Sales
Underlying Sales were $11.1 billion in the year ended 30 June 2020, more than doubling
the prior year driven by strong growth across all regions.
Table 3
Underlying Sales
For the year ended 30 June
2020
2019
Change %
ANZ
US
UK
6,566.9
3,990.4
557.0
4,314.1
927.5
5.6
Underlying Sales ($m)
11,114.2
5,247.2
52%
330%
na
112%
Underlying Sales growth increased during the COVID-19 affected months of the year
ended 30 June 2020. In the nine months to 31 March 2020, Underlying Sales were up
105% on the prior year. From 1 April to 30 June 2020, during which time the impacts of
COVID-19 were in full effect, Afterpay achieved its highest Underlying Sales quarter on
record at $3.8 billion, an increase of 127% on Q4 of the prior year.
2.2 Active Customers
Afterpay ended the year with almost 10 million Active Customers1, an increase of 116% on
the prior year. The average number of orders per Active Customer in the period
(otherwise referred to as customer frequency) also increased across all regions.
Table 4
Active Customers
For the year ended 30 June
ANZ
US
UK
Active Customers (millions)
2020
3.3
5.6
1.0
9.9
2019
2.8
1.8
0.0
4.6
Change %
18%
219%
na
116%
1. Active is defined as having transacted at least once in the last 12 months.
2.3 Active Merchants
Afterpay had more than 55,000 Active Merchants1 by the end of the year, an increase of
more than 23,000, or 72%, on the prior year.
A broadening of the merchant portfolio to add more SMBs continued to be a focus for
Afterpay in the period. Enterprise merchants contributed 61% to Underlying Sales in
FY20, down from 63% in the prior year.
Table 5
Active Merchants
For the year ended 30 June
ANZ
US
UK
Active Merchants ('000s)
2020
42.8
11.5
1.1
55.4
2019
Change %
28.4
3.8
0.0
32.3
51%
202%
na
72%
1. Active is defined as having transacted at least once in the last 12 months.
29
3. Total Income by Service
Total Income for the Group was $519.2 million for the year ended 30 June 2020, an
increase of 97% on the prior year. Afterpay generates income from its Afterpay service
together with a smaller contribution from the Pay Now business, each of which are
discussed separately below.
3.1 Afterpay
Afterpay Total Income is comprised of Afterpay Income (income from merchants) and
Other Income.
In the year ended 30 June 2020, Afterpay Income increased by 116% on the prior year to
$433.8 million. Afterpay Income as a percentage of Afterpay Underlying Sales was 3.9%
in the year, an increase of 0.1 percentage points on the prior year.
Other Income (Late Fees) increased to $68.8 million from $46.1 million in the prior year.
Late Fees grew at a far slower rate than the increase in Underlying Sales and are now
less than 14% of Afterpay Total Income.
Table 6
Afterpay Total Income
For the year ended 30 June
2020
2019
Change %
Afterpay Income ($m)
433.8
200.9
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
3.9%
3.8%
Other Income ($m)
68.8
46.1
% of Afterpay Total Income
Afterpay Total Income ($m)
13.7%
502.7
18.7%
247.0
116%
0.1pp
49%
-5.0pp
103%
3.2 Pay Now
Pay Now Revenue declined by $0.6 million to $16.5 million for the year ended 30 June
2020. Pay Now Revenue in the prior year included $0.9 million of revenue associated
with the European e-Services business unit, which was divested in the prior year. Pay
Now Revenue would have increased year-on-year, after adjusting to exclude the
contribution of the European e-Services business unit in the prior year.
4. Expenses
Expenses increased in the year ended 30 June 2020 as the Group invested in
operational expansion to support its publicly stated ambition to exceed $20 billion of
Underlying Sales by the end of FY22. In particular, the year ended 30 June 2020
represented the first full year period of investment to successfully grow Afterpay’s UK
operations, as well as investment to maximise growth in Afterpay’s largest market
opportunity, the US, in its second full year of trading.
30
Afterpay quickly implemented a response plan that included a focus on limiting losses
during the uncertain COVID-19 period, which contributed to Gross Loss improving
during the COVID-19 period. The Group has continued to execute upon its mid-term
plan while managing risks; and did not receive any government grants or other COVID-
19-related benefits in the year.
The Group is well positioned to continue accelerating investment for growth in line with
a publicly stated ambition to exceed $20 billion in Underlying Sales by the end of FY22.
4.1 Cost of Sales
Cost of Sales for the year ended 30 June 2020 was $134.3 million, up 125% on the prior
year, largely due to increased processing and other variable costs associated with higher
Underlying Sales.
Cost of Sales represented 1.2% of Underlying Sales, an increase of 0.1 percentage points
on the prior year due to an increased contribution of Underlying Sales from the US and
UK regions which have higher processing costs relative to ANZ. Specifically, US and UK
contribution to total Underlying Sales grew from 18% in the year ended 30 June 2019 to
41% in the current year.
Afterpay contributed $128.9 million to Cost of Sales in the period relative to $5.4 million
for Pay Now.
Table 7
Cost of Sales
For the year ended 30 June
2020
2019
Change %
Cost of Sales ($m)
134.3
59.6
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
1.2%
1.1%
125%
0.1pp
4.2
Losses
4.2.1 Receivables Impairment Expense (Gross Loss)
Gross Loss was $94.5 million for the year ended 30 June 2020, representing 0.9% of
Underlying Sales and improving by 0.3 percentage points on the prior year. Gross Loss
improved notwithstanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and increased
Underlying Sales contribution from the newer US and UK markets which have higher
losses relative to ANZ, due to their earlier growth phase.
Improvements in risk management practices and a higher proportion of returning
customers (who are less risky) were key drivers of the improvement in Gross Loss
performance through the year. Notably, collections of instalment payments and Gross
Loss improved during the COVID-19 period.
Table 8
Gross Loss
For the year ended 30 June
2020
2019
Change %
Gross Loss ($m)
94.5
58.7
61%
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
0.9%
1.1%
-0.3pp
31
Net Transaction Loss
Gross Loss is a key input into Afterpay’s Net Transaction Loss (NTL), a management
metric comprised of the sum of Gross Loss, Chargebacks, Debt Recovery Costs, less
Afterpay Other Income (Late Fees). Chargebacks and Debt Recovery Costs are reported
within Other Operating Expenses.
NTL for the year ended 30 June 2020 was $42.8 million, or 0.4% of Underlying Sales. NTL
as a percentage of Underlying Sales was in line with the prior period with a reduction in
Gross Loss offsetting a reduction in Other Income (Late Fees).
Table 9
NTL
For the year ended 30 June
NTL ($m)
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
2020
42.8
0.4%
2019
Change %
22.2
0.4%
93%
0.0pp
Employment Expenses were $86.1 million for the year ended 30 June 2020, up 67% on
the prior year but declining as a percentage of Underlying Sales by 0.2 percentage
points.
The growth in Employment Expenses in dollar terms reflected the Group’s continued
investment in talent, particularly across the sales, technology and product functions, to
support Afterpay’s mid-term plan. Headcount was added in all regions with the Group
closing the year with 665 employees globally, up from 447 employees at 30 June 2019.
Afterpay plans to continue to invest in talent to accelerate market penetration and
global expansion in line with mid-term plans.
Table 10
Employment Expenses
For the year ended 30 June
2020
2019
Change %
Employment Expenses ($m)
86.1
51.4
67%
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
0.8%
1.0%
-0.2pp
Operating Expenses, which comprise Marketing and Other Operating Expenses, were
$146.3 million for the year ended 30 June 2020, up 100% on the prior year. Operating
Expenses represented 1.3% of Underlying Sales and were 0.1 percentage points lower
than the prior year.
Table 11
Operating Expenses
For the year ended 30 June
Operating Expenses ($m)
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
Operating Expenses
(excl. Significant Items) ($m)
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
2020
146.3
1.3%
159.8
1.4%
2019
Change %
73.2
1.4%
68.7
1.3%
100%
-0.1pp
133%
0.1pp
32
4.4.1 Marketing Expenses
Marketing Expenses were $70.5 million in the year ended 30 June 2020, up by 208% and
0.2 percentage points of Underlying Sales compared to the prior year. Marketing
Expenses include both co-marketing initiatives with major brand merchant partners
and other marketing spend such as digital paid media and visual merchandising.
The increase in Marketing Expenses was in line with the Group’s statements at the half
year to increase marketing spend and partner with major brand merchants to
accelerate growth in Underlying Sales. Marketing Expenses in the year also supported
increased investment in brand, including the recent global Afterpay re-brand. Further
investment in marketing will continue next year in line with mid-term plans.
Table 12 Marketing expenses
For the year ended 30 June
2020
2019
Change %
Marketing Expenses ($m)
70.5
22.9
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
0.6%
0.4%
208%
0.2pp
4.4.2 Other Operating Expenses
Other Operating Expenses comprise technology costs which support the global
Afterpay service, costs for outsourced customer services teams, and corporate costs
such as legal, compliance, finance, and other general and administrative costs.
Other Operating Expenses were $75.8 million in the year ended 30 June 2020, up 51% on
the prior year but improving as a percentage of Underlying Sales due to operational
leverage. Increased investment in Other Operating Expenses was made to support
Underlying Sales growth and global expansion, in line with the Group’s mid-term plan,
and will continue to be an area of investment.
Other Operating Expenses included $6.4 million of one-off items (2019: $7.5 million) and
$19.9 million of foreign currency gains (2019: $3.0 million gain). Other Operating
Expenses excluding the net impact of these items would have been $89.3 million,
representing 0.8% of Afterpay Underlying Sales, 0.1 percentage points better than the
prior year.
Table 13
Other Operating Expenses
For the year ended 30 June
Other Operating Expenses ($m)
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
Other Operating Expenses
(excl. Significant Items) ($m)
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
2020
75.8
0.7%
89.3
0.8%
2019
Change %
50.3
1.0%
45.8
0.9%
51%
-0.3pp
95%
-0.1pp
33
5. Margin & EBITDA
5.1 Net Transaction Margin – Afterpay
Net Transaction Margin (NTM) is a non-IFRS measure that is not audited but is a key
financial metric used by management to track Afterpay’s gross profit inclusive of losses
and funding costs. Afterpay NTM is comprised of Afterpay Income less Afterpay variable
costs, including Cost of Sales, NTL, and direct Receivables funding costs.
Afterpay NTM was $250.2 million in the year ended 30 June 2020, up 110% on the prior
year. Afterpay NTM as a percentage of Underlying Sales was stable at 2.3%, reflecting a
stable NTL percentage and higher merchant margin offsetting a higher Cost of Sales
percentage.
Table 14
NTM – Afterpay
For the year ended 30 June
NTM – Afterpay ($m)
% of Afterpay Underlying Sales
2020
250.2
2.3%
2019
Change %
119.3
2.3%
110%
-0.0pp
A reconciliation of Statutory Gross Profit as presented in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income to NTM is set out in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Gross Profit bridge to NTM – Afterpay ($ millions)
384.9
(94.5)
(11.9)
261.3
250.2
(17.1)
(11.1)
Statutory Gross
Profit
Receivables
Impairment
Expenses
NTM Finance costs
Chargebacks and
Debt Recovery costs
Group NTM
Pay Now Margin
Afterpay NTM
Afterpay
receivables
impairment
expense reported
below Gross Profit
but is included in
NTM
Finance cost
associated with
external
receivables
funding reported
in interest
expense but
included in NTM1
Transaction costs
reported in
operating
expenses but
included in NTM
Pay Now revenue
less Pay Now cost
of sales
Note:
1. Finance cost associated with external receivables funding: reported in finance costs but included in NTM. Excludes
amortisation of capitalised borrowing costs, corporate bond interest, lease expense and interest income. Methodology
consistent with prior periods.
34
5.2 EBITDA (excluding Significant Items)
The Group’s EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) was $44.4 million in the year ended 30
June 2020, up 73% on the prior year. The increase in EBITDA (excluding Significant
Items) was driven by growth in Underlying Sales, Afterpay Income, and Net Transaction
Margin in the Afterpay business, partially offset by increased Employment and
Operating Expenses to support strong Underlying Sales growth.
Table 15
EBITDA (excluding Significant Items)
For the year ended 30 June
2020
2019
Change %
EBITDA (excl. Significant Items) ($m)
44.4
25.7
73%
A reconciliation from Loss for the year as presented in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income to EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) is set out in Figure 2
below. EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure that has not been audited but is a key financial
metric used by management to operate the business at a Group level.
Figure 2
Reconciliation from Loss for the year to EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) ($ millions)
44.4
(19.9)
2.0
30.5
6.4
21.1
1.1
(22.9)
(3.9)
(26.8)
30.0
Loss for the
year
Income Tax
Benefit
Loss Before
Tax
Depreciation
And
Amortisation
Share Of Loss
Of Associate
Net Finance
Cost
One-Off
Costs
Fair Value Of
Financial
Liabilities
Share Based
Payments
Foreign
Currency
Gains
EBITDA (excl.
significant
items)
6. Constant Currency
Afterpay’s reported results are impacted by movements in foreign exchange rates given
the extent of the Group’s global operations and the growth in contribution from
international markets outside of Australia.
Constant currency (CC) is provided to facilitate comparability of Afterpay’s operational
performance, excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. Constant currency
is a non-IFRS measure and has been calculated by translating the results for the year
ended 30 June 2020 at the effective exchange rates for the prior year ended 30 June
2019 for each of Underlying Sales and Afterpay Income.
Table 16
Constant Currency
For the year ended 30 June
2020 (CC)
2020
2019
Change
in CC %
Reported
change %
Underlying Sales ($m)
10,851.8
11,114.2
5,247.2
107%
Afterpay Income ($m)
423.8
433.8
200.9
111%
112%
116%
35
7. Financial Position
The Group’s financial position has increased to Net Assets of $946.4 million as at 30 June
2020, up from $648.5 million at 30 June 2019.
Total Assets were $1,608.5 million, an increase of $788.1 million, which is primarily due to
growth in Cash and Cash Equivalents (up $374.6 million) and Receivables (up $329.2
million). The increase in Receivables to $781.9 million at 30 June 2020 was due to the
continued growth in Underlying Sales.
Total Liabilities were $662.2 million, an increase of $490.2 million from 30 June 2019
primarily due to growth in Interest Bearing Loans and Borrowings (up $418.8 million)
and Trade and Other Payables (up $70.7 million). The increase in total Interest Bearing
Loans and Borrowings to $469.0 million at 30 June 2020 was due to increased use of
debt to fund the growth in Receivables.
8. Capital Management
The Group is focused on capital management to ensure that it has sufficient cash and
available facilities to meet current and future funding requirements and growth
aspirations. As at 30 June 2020, the Group’s Balance Sheet and Liquidity position
remained strong with the launch of new, and extension of existing, warehouse funding
facilities during the period. The Group’s Balance Sheet and Liquidity position was further
enhanced following an equity capital raising in July 2020.
8.1 Net Cash / Debt
As at 30 June 2020, reported Net Cash was $138.5 million, comprising Total Cash of
$607.6 million less Interest Bearing Loans and Borrowings of $469.0 million.
Reported Net Cash was $44.7 million lower than prior year due primarily to funding of
growth in Receivables which have increased by $329.2 million from the prior year,
partially offset by capital raisings during the year, which included the $200.0 million
Coatue capital raising completed in the first half of the financial year.
Table 17
Net Cash / (Debt)
As at 30 June
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Restricted Cash1
Total Cash
2020
$m
606.0
1.5
607.6
Interest Bearing Loans and Borrowings
(469.0)
Net Cash
138.5
2019
$m
231.5
2.0
233.5
(50.2)
183.3
Change
$m
374.6
(0.5)
374.1
(418.8)
(44.7)
1. Restricted Cash relates to cash assets held with banks as collateral for daily cash settlements with merchants and payments
to funding providers. Included within Other Financial Assets in the Financial Statements.
The Group completed a capital raising in July 2020, post the conclusion of the financial
year. After allowing for net proceeds from the July 2020 capital raising, Afterpay has pro
forma Total Cash of $1,377.3 million and pro forma net cash of $908.3 million.
36
Table 18
Pro Forma Net Cash / (Debt)
As at 30 June
Net Capital Raising Proceeds1
Pro Forma Total Cash
2020
$m
769.8
1,377.3
Pro Forma Net Cash
1. Relates to the $786.2 million capital raising in July 2020, net of capital raising fees.
908.3
2019
$m
-
233.5
183.3
Change
$m
769.8
1,143.9
725.0
8.2 Debt Funding
The Group’s debt funding is diversified by both source and maturity. During the year
ended 30 June 2020 and through to the date of this report, Afterpay:
> Established a US$200 million US receivables warehouse funding facility with
Goldman Sachs to mature in December 2021;
> Extended the US$200 million US receivables warehouse funding facility with Citi to
May 2022. The US facility with Citi was also reduced from US$300 million to US$200
million, concurrent to the establishment of the Goldman Sachs facility;
> Established a NZ$20 million New Zealand receivables warehouse funding facility
with Bank of New Zealand and subsequently increased the commitment to NZ$50
million and extended the facility to March 2022;
> Extended the $300 million Australian receivables warehouse funding facility with
NAB to December 2022;
> Extended the $200 million Australian receivables warehouse funding facility with Citi
to December 2022; and
> Repaid $50 million unsecured retail notes in Australia.
Afterpay has no debt maturity within the next 12 months (earliest maturity in December
2021), with an average debt facility maturity of ~2.0 years as at the date of this report.
The table below sets out the Group’s debt funding sources as at the date of this report.
Table 19
Debt funding sources
Facility
Region
Provider
Facility Size
Drawn
Maturity
Receivables Warehouse Funding
Receivables Warehouse Funding
Receivables Warehouse Funding
Receivables Warehouse Funding
Receivables Warehouse Funding
AU
AU
NZ
US
US
Citi
$200m
A$75.0m
Dec-22
NAB
$300m
A$80.0m
Dec-22
BNZ
NZ$50m
NZ$25.0m
Mar-22
GS US$200m US$193.0m
Dec-21
Citi US$200m
US$4.0m
May-22
8.3
Liquidity & Growth Capacity
The Group maintains a strong liquidity position and capacity to fund future growth.
Liquidity for Afterpay is calculated as:
>
the Cash and Cash Equivalents balance; plus
> undrawn capacity under receivables warehouse facilities.
Afterpay had Liquidity of $728.4 million at 30 June 2020.
37
The nature of Afterpay’s warehouse facilities is that funds become available in line with
the growth in Receivables. Growth Capacity for Afterpay reflects:
>
the facility limit; less
> drawn debt; less
>
the undrawn capacity under available receivables warehouse facilities.
Afterpay had Growth Capacity of $541.8 million at 30 June 2020.
The combination of Liquidity and Growth Capacity at 30 June 2020 was $1,270.2 million.
Inclusive of the net proceeds from the capital raising in July 2020, Afterpay has Pro
Forma Liquidity of $1,498.2 million. Combined Pro Forma Liquidity and Growth Capacity
is $2,039.9 million, which together provide the ability to fund in excess of $30 billion in
annualised Underlying Sales above the current annualised Underlying Sales run-rate of
$15 billion (Q4).
Figure 3
Afterpay Liquidity and Growth Capacity ($ millions).
606.0
122.4
728.4
541.8
1,270.2
769.8
2,039.9
Growth
Capacity
541.8
Pro Forma
Liquidity
1,498.2
Unrestricted Cash
Undrawn
Warehouse
Capacity
Liquidity
Growth
Capacity
Total Liquidity +
Growth Capacity
Net Capital
Raising Proceeds
Pro Forma
Total Liquidity
+ Growth Capacity
As at 30 June
Pro Forma
9. Outlook for FY21
Afterpay will further accelerate investment for growth in FY21. With new markets
tracking in line with ANZ blueprint, and additional markets coming online in FY21, we
will further accelerate our investment to:
• Enhance our platform and continue to grow our people resources
• Pursue co-marketing opportunities and invest in our retail partners
• Consolidate our market-leading position in existing markets
• Establish a footprint and first/early-mover advantage in new markets
10. Other
This Operating and Financial Review should be read in conjunction with the 2020 in
Review described earlier in this Annual Report.
Any other detail on likely developments in the operations of the consolidated entity and
prospects for future financial years have not been included in this report because the
Directors believe it to be commercial-in-confidence and therefore likely to result in
unreasonable prejudice to the Group.
38
Key Risks & Business
Challenges
The Group continues to establish its presence in the Australian, New Zealand, US and
the UK markets. The principal risks and business challenges for the Group are:
Key Risks
Loss of, or failure to attract, key management personnel
Ability to continue driving customer and merchant growth
• Ability to retain and grow Afterpay’s retail merchant client base;
• Ability to retain and grow Afterpay customers in all markets;
• Ability to increase transaction volumes, merchant and end customer numbers;
• Increased competition and new market entrants;
• Ability of the Group’s technology to integrate with third party platforms,
particularly websites, point of sale systems, and other merchant systems;
• Risks associated with the emergence of new technologies and customer
requirements; and
• Risks associated with macroeconomic factors, including a slowdown in merchant
and customer growth resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Risks related to technology infrastructure, performance and intellectual property
• Failures or disruption to technology systems and communication networks;
• Banking and payment processing performance;
• Exposure to potential security breaches and data protection issues;
• Protection and ownership of technology and intellectual property;
• Capacity constraints on platform and network infrastructure; and
• Risks that the Group’s technology may be superseded by other technology or
changes in business practice.
Credit, fraud and other related risks
• Risk of Afterpay end customers not repaying; and
• Risk of fraud.
Access to funding to support the growth in instalment payments receivables
• Access to equity funding sources; and
• Access to debt funding sources.
Risks associated with compliance and changes to the regulatory environment that
may impact the Group’s products, product delivery, brand and/or financial returns
(due to potential higher compliance costs). Some of these risks may include:
• Financial product regulation
• Payment system regulation
• Regulatory interpretation
• AML / CTF laws
• Privacy laws
A particular area of focus for the Group in the year ended 30 June 2020 has been to
build and expand its enterprise risk management focus and capability, including the
appointment of a Chief Enterprise Risk Officer, to proactively identify and mitigate risks.
The Group’s continued engagement with local regulatory and other stakeholder groups
on its product and service offering in all operating regions has also been a focus.
The Group also continues to strengthen and invest in its business development
resources and processes in sales and marketing as well as in its customer risk, product
and technology / engineering talent and capability with the aim of improving the
Afterpay platform and supporting continued growth.
39
Information on Directors
Elana Rubin
Anthony Eisen
Chair, Independent
Non-Executive Director
Chief Executive Officer and
Managing Director
Chair since 25 May 2020.
Chief Executive Officer and Managing
Independent Non-Executive Director
Director since 1 July 2019.
since 30 March 2017.
Executive Chairman from 5 July 2017
to 30 June 2019.
Background and Experience: Elana
previously served as an Interim Chair from 1
Background and Experience: Prior to his
current role, Anthony served as Executive
July 2019 and has been an Independent Non-
Chairman of Afterpay for two years. Anthony
Executive Director of Afterpay since
has over 25 years’ experience in investing,
2017. Elana has been a longstanding director
public company directorships and providing
of a number of public and private companies,
corporate advice across a variety of sectors.
with extensive experience in property,
Prior to co-founding Afterpay, he was the
insurance and financial services.
Chief Investment Officer at Guinness Peat
Other Roles: Elana is currently a Non-
Executive Director of ASX-listed Telstra
Corporation Limited and Slater and Gordon
Limited. She is also a director of several
unlisted companies and/or government
bodies. Elana was previously a Non-Executive
Group (GPG). He was actively involved in a
number of financial services, software and
technology companies in which GPG was a
major shareholder. Before joining GPG,
Anthony was involved in investment banking,
specialising in mergers and acquisitions.
Director of Mirvac Limited. She was the
Other Roles: Anthony is currently also a
former Chair of AustralianSuper and the
Director of Stone & Chalk Pty Ltd.
Victorian WorkCover Authority. Elana has
over 20 years’ experience as a Non-Executive
Director.
Interests in Shares and Options1:
• 64,847 ordinary shares in Afterpay Limited
Interests in Shares and Options1:
• 20,450,659 ordinary shares in Afterpay
Limited
• 1,500,000 unlisted options relating to equity
awards under the Group’s legacy
remuneration framework, with an exercise
price of $1.00 per option and an expiry date
of 31 December 2020
• 125,000 unlisted options, with an exercise
price of $37.31 per option and an expiry
date of 1 July 2024
1. As at 30 June 2020.
40
Nick Molnar
Gary Briggs
Global Chief Revenue Officer &
Executive Director
Independent Non-Executive
Director
Global Chief Revenue Officer & Executive
Independent Non-Executive Director since 1
Director since 1 July 2019.
January 2020.
Executive Director since 5 July 2017.
Background and Experience: Nick has
Background and Experience: Gary is
extensive experience in online retail. Prior to
currently the Chairman of Hawkfish, a digital
co-founding Afterpay, Nick launched the
agency focused on Democratic causes and
leading American online jeweller, Ice.com,
initiatives. From 2013-2018, Gary was the Chief
into Australia under the local brand
Marketing Officer of Facebook, responsible
Iceonline.com.au. Nick successfully grew Ice
for the Company’s brand, consumer, and
in Australia to become the largest online-only
product marketing. He was Facebook’s first
jewellery and watch retailer. Prior to
CMO. From 2010-13, Gary was at Google,
launching Ice, Nick was an Investment
where he led marketing efforts for search,
Analyst at venture capital fund M.H. Carnegie
maps, commerce, Chrome, Google+,
& Co., where he was primarily responsible for
Google.org, and the Google brand overall. He
growth stage investment opportunities in the
also led marketing for Motorola Mobility,
technology sector. Nick holds a Bachelor of
upon its acquisition by Google. Before
Commerce from Sydney University.
Google, Gary was CEO at Plastic Jungle, a gift
Interests in Shares and Options1:
• 20,450,659 ordinary shares in Afterpay
Limited
• 1,500,000 unlisted options relating to equity
awards under the Group’s legacy
remuneration framework, with an exercise
price of $1.00 per option and an expiry date
of 31 December 2020
card startup, where he joined from their
Board of Directors. Before that, Gary worked
at eBay from 2002-08 in roles as Vice
President of Consumer Marketing, General
Manager of eBay Canada, Global Marketing
Head of PayPal, and CMO of eBay North
America. Earlier in his career, Gary worked for
six years at Pepsi, where he launched
Aquafina, Pepsi's joint venture with Starbucks
• 125,000 unlisted options, with an exercise
price of $37.31 per option and an expiry
and was Director of Brand Pepsi. He also
spent two years at IBM running worldwide
date of 1 July 2024
1. As at 30 June 2020.
brand strategy and was an engagement
manager at McKinsey. He earned a Bachelor
of Arts degree in 1984 from Brown University
and a Masters in Management in 1989 from
the Kellogg School of
Management, Northwestern University.
Other Roles: Gary also serves on the Boards
of Etsy, Inc (NASDAQ: Etsy) and Petco, and is
an advisor to several early stage companies.
Interests in Shares and Options1:
Nil holdings in Afterpay Limited
41
Pat O’Sullivan
Sharon Rothstein
Independent Non-Executive
Director
Independent Non-Executive
Director
Independent Non-Executive Director since 1
Independent Non-Executive Director since 1
March 2020.
June 2020.
Background and Experience: Pat is
Background and Experience: Sharon
currently a director of several companies and
currently serves as an Operating Partner at
previously worked for 30 years in various
growth equity firm, Stripes Group, and is also
senior financial and operational roles in
a listed company director. Prior to her current
Ireland, the US, Australia and New Zealand
roles, Sharon was the Executive Vice
across a number of industries including
President, Global Chief Marketing Officer of
traditional and online media,
Starbucks Corporation for five years, following
telecommunications, fast moving consumer
her position as Senior Vice President of
goods and professional accounting. He was
Marketing at Sephora. Sharon has held senior
the Chief Financial Officer of Optus from 2001
marketing and brand management positions
to 2006 and was the Chief Operating Officer
with Godiva, Starwood Hotels and Resorts,
and Finance Director of Nine Entertainment
Nabisco Biscuit Company and Procter &
Co Pty Limited (formerly PBL Media Pty Ltd)
Gamble. Sharon holds a Bachelor of
from 2006 until 2012. Pat is a member of The
Commerce from the University of British
Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland
Columbia and an M.B.A. from the University
and Australia. He is a graduate of the Harvard
of California, Los Angeles.
Business School’s Advanced Management
Program.
Other Roles: Sharon is currently a Director of
Yelp Inc (NYSE: YELP), and Non-Executive
Other Roles: Pat is currently Chairman of
Director of InterContinental Hotels Group
carsales.com Limited (ASX:CAR), and Deputy
(LON: IHG).
Interests in Shares and Options1:
• Nil holdings in Afterpay Limited
Chair of Calvary Health. Pat was previously an
Independent Non-Executive Director of the
following ASX listed companies; APN Outdoor
(ASX: APO), iSentia (ASX:ISD), Marley Spoon
(ASX:MMM), iSelect (ASX:ISU) and iiNet (ASX:
IIN) and was previously Chairman
of HealthEngine. He is also Chairman of
dreams2live4 an Australian charity that
grants dreams to people with metastatic
cancer.
Interests in Shares and Options1:
• 7,169 ordinary shares in Afterpay Limited
1. As at 30 June 2020.
42
Dana Stalder
Independent Non-Executive
Director
Independent Non-Executive Director since
24 January 2018.
Background and Experience: Dana brings
over 20 years of experience as a technology
company operator and investor. His
experience spans multiple disciplines
including sales, marketing, finance,
technology and product management at
companies such as eBay, Netscape and
PayPal. Dana is an expert in FinTech and an
active FinTech and consumer internet
investor in Silicon Valley. Dana holds a
Bachelor of Science in Commerce from Santa
Clara University, and began his career at
Ernst & Young advising technology
companies. His executive experience extends
to positions held at Netscape
Communications, AOL, Respond.com, eBay
and PayPal before joining Matrix Partners in
2008 as a General Partner. His investments
focus primarily on FinTech, Consumer
Marketplaces, and Enterprise Software.
Other Roles: Dana currently serves on the
Board of Directors of several private US based
technology companies.
Interests in Shares and Options1:
• 19,300 ordinary shares in Afterpay Limited
• Dana is a General Partner in Matrix
Partners, which is the general partner of
Matrix Partners X, L.P. and Weston & Co. X
LLC, however he does not have a relevant
interest in the APT shares and convertible
notes held by those two entities
1. As at 30 June 2020.
43
Former Directors
Clifford Rosenberg
David Hancock
Former Independent
Non-Executive Director
Former Executive Director
Executive Director from 5 July 2017 to 8
Independent Non-Executive Director from 30
October 2019.
March 2017 to 24 May 2020.
Group Head from 5 July 2017 to 30 June 2019.
Independent Non-Executive Director from 30
March 2017 to 4 July 2017.
Background and Experience: Clifford has
spent more than 20 years working at digital
Background and Experience: David has over
30 years of broad experience in financial
companies leading innovation and change in
services. This experience includes being CEO
the industry both as an entrepreneur and
of listed Tower Limited, Executive General
senior executive. Clifford was previously a
Manager at the Commonwealth Bank of
senior executive at LinkedIn, serving as the
Australia, with a variety of roles, including
Managing Director of LinkedIn for South East
capital markets, fixed income and equities.
Asia, Australia and New Zealand. Prior to
Prior to that, he served in senior investment
LinkedIn, Clifford was Managing Director at
banking roles at JPMorgan where he was a
Yahoo Australia and New Zealand, and
Managing Director. Previous to that, David
previously the founder and Managing
spent approximately 10 years at Citi (formerly
Director of iTouch Australia and New Zealand,
County Natwest) where he was Managing
one of the biggest mobile content and
Director and Co-Head of Investment Banking.
application service providers in Australia.
Prior to iTouch Clifford was the Head of
Strategy for Vodafone Australasia. Clifford has
a Bachelor of Business Science (Honours) and
a Master of Science in Management.
Other Roles: Clifford is also a Non-Executive
Director of ASX listed companies Nearmap
Ltd, A2B Australia Limited and Technology
One Limited, a member of the Technology
Committee of AustralianSuper, and a Board
member of BidCorp (JSE). Clifford has
previously been a Director of ASX listed
Other Roles: David currently serves as
Chairman of FinClear Pty Ltd and has
previously been a Director of ASX listed
companies Tower Limited, Elmo Software
Limited and Freedom Insurance Group Ltd.
Interests in Shares and Options1:
• 950,000 ordinary shares in Afterpay Limited
• 200,000 unlisted options relating to equity
awards under the Group’s legacy
remuneration framework with an exercise
price of $1.00 per option and an expiry date
companies IXUP Limited and Pureprofile Ltd.
of 31 December 2020
Interests in Shares and Options1:
• 1,450,659 ordinary shares in Afterpay
Limited
• 2,699,087 unlisted options relating to
equity awards under the Group’s legacy
remuneration framework with an exercise
price of $2.70 per option and an expiry date
of 1 September 2022
1. As at the date of cessation of being a Director of Afterpay Limited.
44
Company Secretary
Amanda Street
Nat McKaig
Company Secretary
Deputy Company Secretary
Company Secretary since 18 August 2020.
Company Secretary since 15 May 2020.
Background and Experience: Amanda was
Background and Experience: Nat has over 15
formerly with Transurban Group, having been
years of legal and company secretariat
Company Secretary since February 2011.
experience. Before joining Afterpay, Nat held
Before joining Transurban, Amanda was
governance / company secretariat roles at
Assistant Company Secretary at AusNet
various listed entities, including BHP Limited,
Services, and Senior Corporate Counsel at
National Australia Bank Limited and Treasury
National Australia Bank. She has over 20 years
Wine Estates Limited. Prior to that, Nat was a
of legal, governance, company secretariat,
solicitor specialising in commercial and
and other relevant experience. Prior to her in-
corporate law. Nat has a Bachelor of Laws,
house work, Amanda was a solicitor
Graduate Diploma in Company Secretarial
specialising in M&A work with Australian law
Practice and is a Fellow of the Governance
firm, King & Wood Mallesons. Amanda has a
Institute of Australia.
Bachelor of Law (Honours) and Bachelor of
Commerce from the University of Melbourne.
45
Meetings of Directors
During the year ended 30 June 2020, Afterpay Limited held 19 meetings of the Board of
Directors, of which 10 were standard scheduled Board meetings and nine were held to
discuss additional business. Attendance of the Directors at meetings of the Board
during the year is set out below:
Table 20 Board Meetings
Scheduled
Additional
Eligible1
Attended
Eligible1
Attended
Elana Rubin
Anthony Eisen
Nick Molnar
Gary Briggs
Pat O’Sullivan
Sharon Rothstein
Dana Stalder
David Hancock
Clifford Rosenberg
10
10
10
5
4
1
10
2
9
10
10
9
5
4
1
10
0
8
9
9
9
2
1
–
9
4
9
Notes:
1. The number of meetings held during the time the Director was a member of the Board.
The Group as at 30 June 2020 had an:
• Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee (ARCC);
• People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee (PRNC); and
• AML/CTF Review Sub-Committee.
The current members of each committee are as follows:
8
9
8
2
1
–
5
4
6
Audit, Risk & Compliance
Committee (ARCC)
People, Remuneration &
Nomination Committee (PRNC)
AML/CTF Review
Sub-Committee
Pat O’Sullivan (Chair1)
Elana Rubin (Interim Chair2)
Elana Rubin (Chair)
Elana Rubin
Pat O’Sullivan
Anthony Eisen
Dana Stalder
Sharon Rothstein
Damian Kassabgi
Cassandra Williams
Leon Zwier3
Notes:
1. Pat O’Sullivan became Chair of the ARCC on 1 March 2020. Dana Stalder was Chair of the ARCC from 1 July 2019 to 29 February
2020.
2. Elana Rubin became Interim Chair of the PRNC on 1 June 2020. Clifford Rosenberg was Chair of the PRNC from 1 July 2019 to
24 May 2020.
3. Leon Zwier commenced a leave of absence from the AML/CTF Review Sub-Committee on 17 April 2020.
46
Attendance of the Directors at meetings of committees of the Board during the year is
set out below:
Table 21
Board Committee Meetings
Audit, Risk &
Compliance
People, Remuneration &
Nomination
AML/CTF Review Sub-
Committee4
Eligible1
Attended
Eligible1
Attended
Eligible1
Attended
Elana Rubin
Anthony Eisen
Nick Molnar
Gary Briggs
Pat O’Sullivan
Sharon Rothstein
Dana Stalder
David Hancock
Clifford Rosenberg
6
–
–
–
1
–
6
2
6
6 X
5 2
6 2
1 2
1 X
– X
6 X
2 X
4 X
7
–
–
–
1
1
–
–
6
7 X
7 2
6 2
2 2
2 3
1 X
3 2
1 2
6 X
34
34
–
–
–
–
–
19
–
33 X
34 5
–
–
–
–
–
9 X
–
Notes:
1. The number of meetings held during the time the Director was a member of the Board.
2. Denotes the Director is not a member of the relevant committee.
3. Pat O’Sullivan attended one meeting as an invitee and one meeting as a member of the relevant committee.
4. The AML/CTF Review Sub-Committee was established on 19 June 2019.
5. The meetings were attended by Anthony Eisen or his delegate.
Significant Changes in the
State of Affairs
In the opinion of the Directors, there were no significant changes in the state of affairs of
the consolidated entity during the financial period, except as otherwise noted in this
report.
Significant Events Subsequent to
the End of the Full Year
The Group completed a $786.2 million capital raising subsequent to 30 June 2020,
which comprised a $650.0 million Institutional Placement and a $136.2 million Share
Purchase Plan (SPP).
On 21 August 2020, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Group entered into a Share
Purchase Agreement (SPA) with NBQ Corporate SLU (NBQ) to acquire 100% of the
shares outstanding in Pagantis SAU and PMT Technology SLU (collectively, Pagantis).
Pagantis currently provides a range of buy now, pay later and traditional credit services
across Spain, France and Italy with regulatory approval to also operate in Portugal and a
pending application to passport its payment institution licence into Germany. Further
details are set out in Note 23 of the Financial Statements.
47
On 26 August 2020, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Group entered into a Share
Purchase Agreement (SPA) with PT Empat Kali Indonesia (EmpatKali). EmpatKali is a
small, Singapore-based, buy now, pay later company operating in Indonesia. Further
details are set out in Note 23 of the Financial Statements.
The Directors are not aware of any other matters or circumstances that have arisen
since 30 June 2020 that have significantly affected or may significantly affect the
operations of the consolidated entity in subsequent financial years, the results of those
operations, or the state of affairs of the consolidated entity in future financial years.
No dividends were declared or paid to shareholders during the year.
Details of share-based payment plans are set out in Note 20 of the Financial Statements.
Afterpay understands the importance of considering the impact of environmental and
social factors on the sustainability of its businesses. Pages 19 to 23 disclose climate
change information and sustainability initiatives that are in place across the Group.
The Group confirms that it is not subject to any particular or significant environmental
legislation under a law of the Commonwealth, State or Territory law of Australia or in any
of the other jurisdictions that Afterpay currently, or is soon to, have a presence in.
In recognising the need for the highest standards of corporate behaviour and
accountability, the Directors support and have adhered to the principles of corporate
governance.
The Board monitors the operational and financial position and performance of Afterpay
Limited and oversees its business strategy, including approving the strategic goals of
the Group and considering and approving its annual business plan and associated
budget. The Board is committed to generating appropriate levels of shareholder value
and financial return and achieving the growth and success of the Group. In conducting
the Group’s business in line with these objectives, the Board seeks to ensure that the
Group is properly managed to protect and enhance shareholder interests and that the
Group, its Directors, officers and personnel operate in an appropriate environment of
corporate governance. Accordingly, the Board has adopted a framework of corporate
governance including risk management practices and internal controls that it believes
appropriate for the Group’s businesses.
Details of the Group’s key policies and the charters for the Board and each of the
committees are available at https://www.afterpay.com/en-AU/corporate-governance/.
48
Remuneration Report
The Remuneration Report set out on pages 52 to 83 forms part of this Directors’ Report.
Insurance of Directors and
Officers
During the year, the Group paid a premium for a Directors and Officers Liability
Insurance Policy. This policy covers Directors and Officers of the Group and the
Consolidated entity. In accordance with normal commercial practices under the terms
of the insurance contracts, the disclosure of the nature of the liabilities insured against
and the amount of the premiums are prohibited by the policy.
Indemnification of Auditors
To the extent permitted by law, the Group has agreed to indemnify its auditors, Ernst &
Young, as part of the terms of its audit engagement agreement against claims by third
parties arising from the audit (for an unspecified amount). No payment has been made
to indemnify Ernst & Young during or since the financial year.
Proceedings on Behalf of the
Group
There are no proceedings brought or intervened in, or applications to bring or intervene
in proceedings, on behalf of the company by a member or other person entitled to do so
under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Non-Audit Services
The Group may decide to employ the auditor on assignments additional to their
statutory audit duties where the auditor’s expertise and experience with the Group
and/or the consolidated entity are important.
The Board of Directors has considered the position and, in accordance with the advice
received from the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee, is satisfied that the provision of
the non-audit services is compatible with the general standard of independence for
auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. The Directors are satisfied that the
provision of non-audit services by the auditor, as set out below, did not compromise the
auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 for the following
reasons:
49
• all non-audit services have been reviewed by the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee
to ensure they do not impact the impartiality and objectivity of the auditor; and
• none of the services undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence
as set out in APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, including reviewing
or auditing the auditor’s own work, acting in a management or a decision making
capacity for the Group, acting as advocate for the Group or jointly sharing economic risk
and rewards.
Details of the audit and non-audit fees paid or payable for services provided by the
auditor of the parent entity, and its related practices, are detailed in Note 24.
Auditor Independence
A copy of the Auditors’ Independence Declaration as required under Section 307C of the
Corporations Act 2001 is included in this Report.
Rounding Off of Amounts
The amounts contained in this report and in the financial report have been rounded to
the nearest $1,000 (unless otherwise stated) under the option available to the Group
under ASIC Corporations (Rounding in Financial/Directors’ Reports) Instruments
2016/191. The Group is an entity to which the legislative instrument applies.
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
Ernst & Young
8 Exhibition Street
Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
GPO Box 67 Melbourne VIC 3001
Tel: +61 3 9288 8000
Fax: +61 3 8650 7777
ey.com/au
Auditor’s Independence Declaration to the Directors of Afterpay Limited
As lead auditor for the audit of the financial report of Afterpay Limited for the financial year ended 30
June 2020, I declare to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
a) no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in
relation to the audit; and
b) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
This declaration is in respect of Afterpay Limited and the entities it controlled during the financial year.
Ernst & Young
David McGregor
Partner
27 August 2020
Elana Rubin
Chair, Independent Non-Executive Director
Melbourne
27 August 2020
50
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Ernst & Young
8 Exhibition Street
Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
GPO Box 67 Melbourne VIC 3001
Tel: +61 3 9288 8000
Fax: +61 3 8650 7777
ey.com/au
Auditor’s Independence Declaration to the Directors of Afterpay Limited
As lead auditor for the audit of the financial report of Afterpay Limited for the financial year ended 30
June 2020, I declare to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
a) no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in
relation to the audit; and
b) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
This declaration is in respect of Afterpay Limited and the entities it controlled during the financial year.
Ernst & Young
David McGregor
Partner
27 August 2020
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Remuneration Report
Remuneration
Report.
Through our new values –
Be Brave, Keep it Real, Do the
Right Thing and Shape the Future
– we will drive the right behaviours
in how we work together and the
decisions we make to deliver a
sustainable business.
Remuneration
Report.
Through our new values –
Be Brave, Keep it Real, Do the
Right Thing and Shape the Future
– we will drive the right behaviours
in how we work together and the
decisions we make to deliver a
sustainable business.
Remuneration Report
1. Executive Summary
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Afterpay Limited (Afterpay or the Group), we are pleased to present
the FY20 Remuneration Report (Report).
At Afterpay, our people are our greatest asset and our business is all about human connection. Having the
right culture and a team of people with shared values and a clear purpose is critical to the sustainability of
our business. We recognise that remuneration is only one of a number of reasons why our people come to
work for us every day. Further detail on people and culture at Afterpay is set out in the “Do the Right Thing”
section of this Annual Report.
1.1 FY20 – Strength in an uncertain environment
FY20 has presented a number of challenges for businesses globally. Most notably, the emergence of
COVID-19 has created wide ranging social and economic uncertainty.
During FY20, Afterpay acted quickly to implement its COVID-19 response plan to manage the business
through the current climate. Our response centred upon taking care of our people, preserving our strong
relationships with customers and merchants, limiting losses, preserving margins and maintaining our strong
balance sheet and capital position.
Despite challenging market conditions, our response plan and business delivered strong financial
performance in FY20 and we continued to achieve a number of significant operational milestones. Afterpay’s
share price increased 143% during FY20, the highest share price return in the benchmark S&P/ASX 200 Index;
the Group processed more than $11.1 billion of Underlying Sales on its platform, growing 112% on the prior
year; Afterpay expanded its market leading position in its home market of Australia (with 3.3 million Active
Customers at 30 June 2020); the US platform continued to grow above expectations (with 5.6 million Active
Customers reached in that market); the UK reached 1.0 million Active Customers in its first full year of
operations; and significant progress was made in preparing for further international expansion.
At Afterpay, one of our core strategic pillars is “Do the Right Thing”. We are focused on never losing sight of
our key stakeholders (including our customers, merchants, shareholders and other external parties) and
recognise that the impacts of COVID-19 have been widely felt across the community.
In this context, in April 2020 at the height of the uncertainty of the impact of COVID-19, and despite the
Group’s strong performance, the Group’s co-founders Anthony Eisen and Nick Molnar (the Co-Founders)
elected to take a 20% reduction in base salaries for three months from May 2020 and the Non-Executive
Directors (NEDs) elected to take a 20% reduction in their Board base member and Committee fees for the
same period.
Separate to the response to COVID-19, the Co-Founders also volunteered to forego the short-term incentive
and restricted stock unit components of the new FY20 executive remuneration framework, having regard to
their existing shareholdings which encourage a focus on long-term sustainable decision making.
Further detail in respect of the Group’s FY20 performance and remuneration outcomes for Executive Key
Management Personnel (Executive KMP) is outlined in sections 2 and 5.
53
1.2 Our new FY20 executive remuneration framework implemented
Competing for talent in the global technology talent pool
Afterpay is one of only a small group of ASX listed companies operating in the global technology sector. The
global market for technology talent is highly competitive, particularly in regions like the US. The
remuneration packages offered to top-tier talent within these markets are typically more leveraged to the
long-term than in the Australian market, and often place greater emphasis on equity grants which are
subject to continued employment only (rather than long-term performance hurdles). The weighting to equity
grants is also often a reflection of cash-conservation in an early start-up phase to re-invest in growth.
The Group’s legacy executive remuneration arrangements (which have previously comprised low cash base
salary, low cash short-term incentives and one-off equity awards subject to continued service and KPIs in
some cases (refer section 5.6)) were reflective of the Group’s need to attract top talent from this global
technology talent pool in a cash-constrained early growth phase.
These service-based equity arrangements were successful in attracting and securing key talent that the
Group would not have otherwise been able to attract as a smaller company. However, in line with the Group’s
growth, and as disclosed in the FY19 Remuneration Report, the Board spent considerable time and effort
listening to and addressing stakeholder feedback and developing a new FY20 Executive KMP remuneration
framework to meet the expectations of our stakeholders as a top S&P/ASX 100 company.
Key features of our new framework
An overview of our FY20 remuneration framework is provided in section 4 and the framework is outlined in
detail in section 5. Key features of the new Executive KMP remuneration framework include:
• delivery of Executive KMP remuneration packages in four elements (subject to transitionary
arrangements). Packages comprise a “fixed remuneration” component which is made up of two elements,
being fixed cash remuneration (base salary and superannuation), set below market, and an annual fixed
grant of restricted stock units (RSUs), which vest in equal parts annually over three years (subject to service).
The “variable remuneration” component of packages is also comprised of two elements being a moderate
cash short-term incentive (STI), and a formal long-term incentive program (LTI) comprising annual grants of
options, which are subject to formal long-term performance hurdles tested over three years. Our moderate
STI and formal LTI programs are aligned to Australian listed market expectations;
•
remuneration packages that are highly leveraged to the long-term and equity (as opposed to the short-
term and cash, respectively) to generate strong alignment between Executive KMP and shareholders,
encourage long-term sustainable decision making, and support our objective of remaining competitive
for talent in the US market and unlisted technology segments. The fixed cash remuneration component is
positioned below market in recognition of the annual fixed grant of RSUs (which serves as a retention
mechanism, creates shareholder alignment and supports in the attraction of key talent from global
technology markets where service-based equity is common practice). The combination of these two
elements (i.e. the ‘‘fixed remuneration’’ component) is positioned at or around the median of total fixed
remuneration of peer companies. Our cash STI program is also positioned conservatively relative to peer
companies, with the LTI component making up the majority of Executive KMP total remuneration;
• a new balanced scorecard approach for the FY20 STI, reflecting key financial and non-financial value
drivers for the business. Performance measures and targets are set at challenging levels in line with the
Group’s mid-term plan;
•
introduction of a formal performance-tested LTI. Annual LTI grants are tested against two equally
weighted measures, being absolute Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) (i.e. Underlying Sales) (50%) and Afterpay
Net Transaction Margin (NTM) (50%) assessed over three years. These measures represent core tenets of the
Group’s growth strategy and are key metrics used by the market to assess the Group’s performance. Delivery
of the LTI in options also encourages a focus on the Group’s share price performance as the LTI will only
deliver value to Executive KMP if both the share price increases above the exercise price and the performance
measures are met; and
54
• strengthening our consequence management mechanisms to set a clear “tone from the top” and
provide the Board with the ability to address any sub-optimal behaviour. Malus / clawback requirements
apply to all elements of the framework. In addition to overarching Board discretion, the STI is subject to a
Board discretion modifier for “doing the right thing”.
All new employees joining at the Executive KMP level from FY20 will commence on the framework and be
eligible to receive all four elements (outlined above). The former Global Chief Operating Officer’s employment
package was in line with the new framework when he commenced employment in FY20.
In respect of existing Executive KMP:
• The Co-Founders elected to forego any STI or RSU component under the FY20 framework having regard
to their existing shareholdings which already encourage a focus on long-term sustainable decision making.
•
It is intended that the Global Chief Financial Officer (Global CFO) will transition onto the equity components
of the new framework (i.e. the LTI and RSUs), having regard to the vesting dates of his legacy option grants
(which are not yet fully vested). The transitionary arrangements for the Global CFO will be disclosed in the
FY21 Remuneration Report.
55
2. FY20 Performance & Remuneration—
Snapshot
We set out below a snapshot of the Group’s FY20 performance highlights and how these have been reflected
in FY20 remuneration outcomes.
FY20 Group Performance
Group
performance
highlights
(SECTION 5.1)
• The Group achieved exceptional growth across all key platform metrics including
Underlying Sales of $11.1b (up 112% on FY19), Active Customers of 9.9m (up 116% on FY19) and
Active Merchants of 55.4k (up 72% on FY19).
• At the same time, the Group has delivered strong risk management outcomes with Net
Transaction Loss (NTL) maintained at 0.4% of Underlying Sales notwithstanding the
increasing contributions from newer, initially higher loss markets.
• Afterpay NTM of 2.3% remains above the Group’s mid-term target of approximately 2% by
FY22.
• EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) of $44.4m was up 73% on FY19 and a strong result
considering the investment for growth as planned.
FY20 Executive KMP Remuneration Outcomes
Fixed
remuneration
(SECTION 5.2)
FY20 STI
outcomes
(SECTION 5.3)
FY20 LTI
grants
(SECTION 5.4)
• FY20 fixed remuneration comprises a cash component (base salary and superannuation)
and RSUs (which vest over 3 years).
• The Co-Founders elected to forego the RSU component for FY20 and no RSUs were granted
to the Global CFO in recognition of his legacy one-off awards which are not yet fully vested.
• The Co-Founders’ fixed cash remuneration during FY20 was $450,000 (inclusive of
superannuation), on an annualised basis, which is positioned well below market. The Co-
Founders elected to take a 20% reduction in base salaries for three months from May 2020
in recognition of the impact of COVID-19 across the community.
• Despite the Group’s strong performance in FY20, the Global CFO was the only Executive
KMP who received an STI, for which vesting was 86% of the maximum.
•
In respect of other Executive KMP, the Co-Founders elected to forego an STI under the new
FY20 framework and the former Global Chief Operating Officer and Group Head were not
eligible for an STI (refer section 3).
• FY20 LTI grants were made to the Co-Founders (as approved by shareholders at the 2019
AGM) and the former Global Chief Operating Officer. In addition to being performance
tested, the exercise price on the Co-Founders’ option grants was set at a 20% premium to
market.
• No LTI grant was made to the Global CFO in recognition of his legacy one-off equity awards.
Legacy one-off
equity grants
(SECTION 5.6)
• No new one-off equity grants were made to Executive KMP during FY20 as the Group
transitioned to its new FY20 executive remuneration framework. The second tranche of the
Global CFO’s legacy one-off equity awards, which was due to vest in June 2020, has fully
vested. The third and final tranche of the Global CFO’s legacy one-off equity awards is due to
vest in June 2021.
Non-Executive Director Remuneration
• At the 2019 AGM, the Group’s shareholders approved a Non-Executive Director fee pool of $1,800,000.
• The Group’s new FY20 Non-Executive Director fee schedule (as disclosed in FY19) became effective during the
Reporting Period, accompanied by a new minimum shareholding requirement to further align the interests of
Non-Executive Directors with our shareholders.
•
In April 2020, the Group’s Non-Executive Directors elected to take a 20% reduction in their Board base member
and Committee fees for three months from May 2020, reflecting the uncertainty about the impact of COVID-19 on
key stakeholders and the community at that time.
Other Changes
• As previously disclosed, during FY19, Executive KMP volunteered for their FY19 STI awards to be withheld until the
outcomes of the final report from the independent external auditor of the AUSTRAC audit were known (with the
Board reserving discretion to make adjustments to final outcomes). FY19 STI awards and a portion of the former
Group Head’s options will continue to be withheld until the final determination of the AUSTRAC audit.
• The Group’s Remuneration & Nomination Committee was also expanded to a People, Remuneration &
Nomination Committee with greater oversight over people-related policies.
Underlying
Sales
112%
on FY19
Active
Customers
116%
on FY19
Active
Merchants
72%
on FY19
Net Transaction
Margin
2.3%
of underlying sales
Net Transaction
Loss
0.4%
of underlying sales
56
3. Who is covered by this Report
This Report outlines the remuneration arrangements in place for KMP of the Group in FY20, which comprises
all Non-Executive Directors and senior executives who have authority and responsibility for planning,
directing and controlling the activities of the Group. Table 1 below sets out the Group’s KMP during FY20.
Afterpay seeks to maintain a global organisational structure that enables and empowers our teams to deliver
on our strategic objectives. In FY20, we transitioned to a simpler leadership structure, with more focused
roles, to enable our leaders to better execute on a global scale and enhance our ability to respond quickly in a
rapidly changing business environment.
As part of these changes, it was determined that the broad accountabilities of the former Global Chief
Operating Officer (Frerk-Malte (Malte) Feller), including product and technology, would be allocated to
dedicated executive roles. The former Global Chief Operating Officer ceased as an Executive KMP on 12 June
2020 and, from this date, will work out a mutually agreed notice period until 25 November 2020 to facilitate
the transition of his role (as required), at which time he will cease formal employment with the Group. Refer
section 5.5 for further detail on the treatment of the former Global Chief Operating Officer’s equity
arrangements upon cessation of employment.
As part of our commitment to increasing the representation of independent Non-Executive Directors, and a
continuous focus on expanding our Board’s skillset, the Board also undertook an extensive global search
during FY20 for new talent. The Group announced the appointment of three highly experienced Non-
Executive Directors to the Board: Gary Briggs, Pat O’Sullivan and Sharon Rothstein. The Group was also
pleased to announce the appointment of Elana Rubin as Independent Chair of the Board in May 2020. Refer
section 6 for further detail on these changes.
Table 1
Overview of FY20 KMP
KMP
Position
Term as KMP
Executive KMP
Anthony Eisen1
Nick Molnar2
Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director
Full Year
Global Chief Revenue Officer and Executive
Director
Full Year
Luke Bortoli
Global Chief Financial Officer
Full Year
Frerk-Malte Feller3
Global Chief Operating Officer
Ceased as KMP on 12 June 2020
David Hancock4
Group Head and Executive Director
Ceased as KMP on 8 October 2019
Non-Executive Directors
Elana Rubin5
Dana Stalder
Independent Chair
Non-Executive Director
Full Year
Full Year
Clifford Rosenberg6
Non-Executive Director
Ceased as KMP on 24 May 2020
Gary Briggs7
Non-Executive Director
Effective 1 January 2020
Pat O’Sullivan8
Non-Executive Director
Sharon Rothstein9
Non-Executive Director
Effective 1 March 2020
Effective 1 June 2020
1. Anthony Eisen held the role of Executive Chairman during the 2019 financial year, i.e. until 30 June 2019. Anthony ceased in his role as Executive Chairman
on 30 June 2019 and assumed the role of Chief Executive Offer and Managing Director effective 1 July 2019.
2. Nick Molnar held the position of Executive Director and CEO, Afterpay during the 2019 financial year, i.e. until 30 June 2019. Nick assumed the role of Global
Chief Revenue Officer (reporting to the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director) effective 1 July 2019.
3. Frerk-Malte Feller held the position of Global Chief Operating Officer during the 2020 financial year effective from 1 July 2019. Malte ceased as KMP on 12
June 2020 and will cease formal employment with the Group on 25 November 2020.
4. David Hancock held the position of Group Head and Executive Director during the 2019 financial year, i.e. until 30 June 2019. David transitioned his role to
the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at the conclusion of FY19 and ceased as an Executive KMP on 8 October 2019 when he ceased as a
Director of Afterpay Limited.
5. Elana Rubin was appointed as Independent Interim Chair, effective 1 July 2019, and transitioned into the permanent role of Independent Chair effective 25
May 2020.
6. Clifford Rosenberg ceased as a Non-Executive Director, effective 24 May 2020.
7. Gary Briggs was appointed as a Non-Executive Director, effective 1 January 2020.
8. Pat O’Sullivan was appointed as a Non-Executive Director, effective 1 March 2020.
9. Sharon Rothstein was appointed as a Non-Executive Director, effective 1 June 2020.
57
4. FY20 Executive Remuneration
Framework
4.1 Snapshot
1. Our Strategic Priorities
Brand
Grow
Innovate
Perform
Do the Right Thing
It’s not pay in four, or BNPL,
it’s Afterpay.
Expand globally to deepen
retailer partnerships.
We are the verb and our own
category.
New visual identity to
enhance alignment with our
global customer base and
differentiation.
Increased focus on SMB
acceptance in newer
markets.
Utilise brand and innovation
to drive customer
acceptance and retention.
Drive greater ecosystem
value to customers and
merchants.
Customer-led differentiation
via platform enhancements.
Merchant insights, tools and
value-added outcomes.
Maintain focus in every
aspect of our performance.
Accelerate investment in the
global addressable market
opportunity.
Maintain focus on our
people, protecting the
business, caring for
communities and good
corporate governance.
2. Remuneration Policy & Principles
3. Our Executive KMP Remuneration Framework – Visualised
Acting like owners and pay for
performance
Strong alignment between executive
reward and shareholder outcomes
Drive an “ownership mindset” and
encourage a focus on long-term sustainable
decision making in the interests of all of our
stakeholders
Strategy-led and customer-centric
Aligned with the Group’s key value drivers
and strategic objectives
Support the Group’s high-performance
culture and focus executives on delivering
exceptional results and the best possible
user experience for our customers
Attract, motivate and retain world’s
best talent
Market competitive remuneration to attract
and retain world-class talent from the global
technology talent pool, with the skills and
experience to drive our global expansion
and shareholder returns
Fixed Cash Base Salary + Super
1 year
Positioned below median of peer companies (in recognition of the
annual RSU grant)
Fixed Annual RSU Grant
1 to 3 years
Annual RSU grants as part of fixed remuneration to reflect the higher
focus on equity under the framework
Vesting in equal annual tranches over 3 years (subject to service)
Subject to malus and clawback
Short-Term Incentive
1 year
Positioned below the median of peers
Paid in cash at end of financial year
Subject to clawback and a Board discretion modifier for “doing the
right thing”
Doing the right thing
LTI Performance Tested Options
Meeting the expectations of our
shareholders, customers, regulators and the
broader community
3 years
Annual LTI grants subject to formal performance testing
Positioned above the median of peers and subject to malus and
clawback
Fixed
Remuneration
Aggregate of cash
base salary and
super, and RSUs, is
positioned at or
around the median
of total fixed
remuneration of
peer companies
Variable
Remuneration
Heavy weighting in
variable
remuneration
towards LTI (as
against STI) to
support long-term
sustainable
decision making
4. A Pay Mix for Performance
Heavy weighting towards equity and the long-term to support alignment with shareholder interests
Co-Founders1
23%
77%
Other Executive KMP2
14%
19%
14%
52%
Fixed (cash base salary + super)
Fixed (RSUs)
Short-term incentive
Long-term incentive
1. The Co-Founders volunteered not to receive an STI or RSUs for FY20. Total fixed remuneration for the Co-Founders is shown on an annualised basis and does
not take into account the voluntary 20% reduction in base salaries for May and June 2020.
2. This pay mix reflects the annual FY20 package of the former Global Chief Operating Officer (Frerk-Malte Feller). It is intended that the Global CFO (Luke
Bortoli) will transition onto the equity components of the FY20 framework having regard to the vesting dates of his legacy option grant.
58
4.2 More Detail
We set out below a more detailed description of each element of the FY20 executive remuneration
framework and the rationale and positioning relative to peer companies.
Table 2
Detailed Overview of FY20 Executive Remuneration Framework
Element
Description
Positioning against peers and rationale
Fixed Remuneration
Fixed cash
remuneration
(SECTION 5.2)
• Comprises base salary and superannuation
• Set conservatively having regard to the individual’s role,
responsibilities, skills, experience and performance, and
remuneration levels offered by comparable companies
with whom the Group competes for talent
• Positioned below median of peer companies in
recognition of the annual RSU grant which is also
part of fixed compensation
• Reviewed periodically with adjustments only for
change in role or promotion, internal relativities and
significant market changes, including material
market relativity changes (not CPI / wage growth
increases)
Annual RSU
grant
(SECTION 5.2)
•
Instrument: RSUs (i.e. a right to a share upon satisfaction of
vesting conditions) granted annually
• Allocation methodology: Annual grants at market price
• Compensates for conservative positioning of fixed
cash remuneration and is awarded as part of fixed
remuneration to reflect the higher focus on equity
(i.e. face value allocation methodology)
• Restricted equity component generates strong
• Vesting period / conditions: three equal tranches vesting
annually over three years (subject to continued
employment at vesting dates)
• Subject to malus / clawback and no dividend or voting
rights over vesting period
alignment between executives and shareholders
and provides a retention mechanism for key talent
(as vesting is subject to continued employment at
the respective vesting dates)
Fixed cash remuneration is positioned low relative to peers in recognition of the annual RSU grant. The sum of these two elements represents
“total fixed remuneration” and is positioned at or around the median of peer companies (having regard to market capitalisation and
comparable companies in relevant industries), with a higher weighting to equity than cash to encourage alignment with shareholders
Variable Remuneration
Short-term
incentive
(SECTION 5.3)
•
Instrument: cash
• Performance period: financial year
• Vesting conditions: balanced scorecard comprising
financial (50%), customer (20%), merchants (10%),
innovation (10%), and people (10%) measures
• Subject to clawback and Board discretion modifier for
“doing the right thing” (i.e. downward adjustments for
conduct, risk, regulatory and reputational issues, and
quality of results)
• Positioned below the median of peer companies
in favour of heavy weighting towards LTI to provide
for a stronger alignment to shareholder interests
and to support long-term decision making
• To reward the achievement of challenging annual
goals set in line with the Group’s mid-term plan and
to reflect the key value drivers of the business to
deliver returns for shareholders
Long-term
incentive
(SECTION 5.4)
•
Instrument / allocation methodology: options granted
annually using a Binomial Model
• LTI opportunity is positioned above market (i.e.
packages are highly leveraged to LTI)
• Exercise price: set based on volume weighted average
• To reward for achievement of challenging long-term
price (VWAP) of Afterpay Limited shares based on the 10
day VWAP post release of full year results (with a 20%
premium for the Co-Founders for FY20)
• Performance period: three years
• Performance conditions: GMV (i.e. Underlying Sales) (50%)
and NTM (50%)
• Subject to malus and clawback
goals, generate strong alignment between
executives and shareholders, and encourage
sustainable decision making in the long-term
interests of shareholders
• Market price options (with a premium for the Co-
Founders for FY20) also encourage a focus on
growing the share price and shareholder return
Cash STI levels are conservative relative to peers, with packages highly leveraged to the LTI to support long-term sustainable decision making
and alignment with shareholders
FY20 Transitionary Approach – New and Existing Executive KMP
• All new employees joining
Afterpay at the Executive KMP
level from FY20 will commence
on the new framework and be
eligible to receive all four
elements
• Reflecting this, the FY20
remuneration package for the
former Global Chief Operating
Officer (who commenced on 1
July 2019) was aligned with the
new FY20 framework
• As previously disclosed, the Co-Founders
volunteered to forego the STI and RSU
components of the new framework for FY20,
having regard to their existing shareholdings
which encourage a focus on long-term
sustainable decision making
• The Co-Founders’ total remuneration for FY20
was positioned very conservatively relative to
market with a modest cash base salary and a
heavy weighting towards their LTI (which was
approved by shareholders at the 2019 AGM)
• The exercise price on the Co-Founders’ LTI
options was also set at a 20% premium
• The Global CFO only received fixed
remuneration and an STI for FY20 (i.e. he
was not granted RSUs or an LTI in FY20), in
recognition of his legacy option grant (refer
section 5.6)
•
It is intended that the Global CFO will
transition onto the equity components of
the new framework (i.e. the LTI and RSUs)
having regard to the vesting dates of his
legacy one-off option grant (refer section
5.5). The transitionary arrangements for the
Global CFO will be disclosed in the FY21
Remuneration Report
59
5. FY20 Executive Remuneration
Outcomes
5.1 Overview of Group performance
The Group is committed to ensuring strong alignment between the Group’s performance and shareholder
experience, and what is paid to its executives in remuneration. During FY20, the Group achieved strong
growth in respect of key financial and non-financial indicators set out in Table 3 below. Group performance is
only shown from FY18 as the Group was only formed in June 2017.
Table 3
FY20 Group performance relative to FY19 and FY18
$m (unless otherwise stated)
Change1 %
Share price performance as at y/e ($/sh)
143%
Total dividends paid
GMV (i.e. Underlying Sales)
Active Customers (m)
Active Merchants (‘000s)
Total Income2
Net Transaction Loss3
Afterpay Net Transaction Margin4
EBITDA (excluding Significant Items)5,6
-%
112%
116%
72%
97%
93%
110%
73%
FY20
60.99
-
FY19
25.07
-
FY18
9.35
-
11,114.2
5,247.2
2,184.6
9.9
55.4
519.2
(42.8)
250.2
44.4
4.6
32.3
264.1
(22.2)
119.3
25.7
2.0
16.0
142.3
(9.3)
55.7
33.8
1. Change percentage based on FY20 compared to FY19.
2. Total income comprises Afterpay income, Pay Now revenue and Other income.
3. NTL is comprised of receivables impairment expense (gross loss), chargebacks, debt recovery costs less Other income.
4. Afterpay NTM is a key financial metric used by management and reflects Afterpay income less variable costs, which includes cost of sales, NTL, and direct
receivables funding costs. A reconciliation of statutory gross profit to Afterpay net transaction margin is included in the Operating and Financial Review of
the 2020 Annual Report.
5. FY20 EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) excludes a favourable $19.9 million FX gain; FY19 has been restated to exclude a favourable $3.0 million FX gain;
and FY18 has been restated to exclude a favourable $1.4 million FX gain.
6. FY20 EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) includes a $5.6 million benefit from the adoption of AASB 16 Leases. FY19 and FY18 EBITDA (excluding Significant
Items) have not been restated for the adoption of AASB 16 Leases, as per the specific transitional provisions.
Delivery of strong operational and financial performance in the Reporting Period translated to strong returns
for Afterpay’s shareholders. The Group’s share price increased by 143% from a closing share price of $25.07 at
28 June 2019 (the last trading day of FY19) to $60.99 on 30 June 2020, representing the highest share price
return of all companies in the S&P/ASX 200 Index at period end. By comparison, the S&P/ASX 200 Index
declined by 11% from 6618.77 points to 5897.88 points. Moreover, total shareholder return when assessed over
the last two financial years is higher, with the Group’s share price increasing from $9.35 at 29 June 2018 (the
last trading day of FY18) to $60.99 on 30 June 2020, representing a total return of 552%.
60
Figure 1
FY20 APT share price performance compared to the S&P/ASX 200 Index
250%
220%
190%
160%
130%
100%
70%
40%
10%
)
0
0
1
=
9
1
0
2
y
l
u
J
1
(
e
c
i
r
P
d
e
x
e
d
n
I
143%
(11)%
Jun-2019
Aug-2019
Oct-2019
Dec-2019
Feb-2020
Apr-2020
Jun-2020
Financial Year 2020
APT
S&P/ASX 200 Index
Source: Bloomberg
5.2 Total fixed remuneration
5.2.1 Overview of FY20 total fixed remuneration levels
As outlined in section 4, under the FY20 remuneration framework, the fixed remuneration component for
Executive KMP comprises two elements being (1) fixed cash remuneration which includes cash base salary
and superannuation; and (2) fixed annual grant of RSUs which vests in equal tranches annually over 3 years
(subject to service at the respective vesting dates).
Table 4 below outlines Executive KMP’s contractual fixed remuneration on an annualised basis. As noted
above, in addition to electing to forego an RSU component for FY20 under the new framework, in April 2020
the Co-Founders elected to take a 20% reduction in their cash base salaries for three months from May 2020,
reflecting the uncertainty of the impact of COVID-19 on the community. The Global CFO did not receive an
RSU grant during FY20 having regard to his legacy one-off equity grant which is not yet fully vested.
Table 4
FY20 fixed remuneration levels for Executive KMP (contract values)
Total Fixed Remuneration (FY20)
Executive KMP
Anthony Eisen3
Nick Molnar3
Luke Bortoli
Frerk-Malte Feller (part year)4
Fixed cash
remuneration1
Face value of RSUs
Face value of RSUs
(% of fixed cash
remuneration)
Total fixed
remuneration2
$450,000
$450,000
$300,000
$300,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
$400,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
133%
$450,0003
$450,0003
$300,000
$700,000
1. Fixed cash remuneration represents the contract value and includes cash base salary and superannuation.
2. Total fixed remuneration represents the sum of fixed cash remuneration and the face value of RSUs (as applicable).
3. Total fixed remuneration for the Co-Founders is shown on an annualised basis and excludes the voluntary 20% reduction in salaries for May and June 2020.
4. Total fixed remuneration for the former Global Chief Operating Officer is shown on an annualised basis. Refer section 5.5 for further detail regarding the
treatment of the former Global Chief Operating Officer’s RSUs which will apply on cessation of employment.
61
5.2.2 FY20 RSUs key terms – further detail
Table 5 below sets out the key terms which apply to the RSUs granted as part of total fixed remuneration
during FY20. The former Global Chief Operating Officer was the only Executive KMP to receive RSU grants
during the period.
Table 5
RSUs – key terms
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) – Key Terms
Term
Further Detail
Allocation
methodology
Entitlement
Vesting
conditions and
schedule
RSUs were granted on a face value basis by dividing the participant’s RSU dollar value opportunity in Australian dollars for FY20
by the 10-day VWAP of Afterpay Limited shares traded in the period immediately following the release of the 2019 full year
results.
Upon satisfaction of the vesting conditions, each RSU entitles the participant to one fully paid ordinary share in Afterpay Limited
(or a cash equivalent payment in lieu of a share at the discretion of the Board). Participants are not required to pay any amount
(e.g. an exercise price) upon vesting of the RSUs.
The RSUs will vest subject to the participant remaining employed by, or continuing to provide services to, the Group at each
vesting date. The vesting schedule in respect of the RSUs granted during FY20 is set out below:
Tranche
Vesting Date
Percentage of FY20 RSUs
1
2
3
1 July 2020
1 July 2021
1 July 2022
One-third
One-third
One-third
Treatment on
cessation of
employment
If the participant ceases to be employed, any unvested RSUs will immediately lapse.
However, the Board may, in its absolute discretion and subject to any requirement for shareholder approval, determine to treat
any of the unvested RSUs in a different manner (e.g. in the case of a “good leaver”). A “good leaver” may include, for example, an
employee who leaves the company due to death, total or permanent disablement, illness, genuine redundancy, or other factors
determined by the Board to constitute sufficient reason to treat the person as a ‘‘good leaver’’. Refer to section 5.5 for further
detail regarding treatment of the former Global Chief Operating Officer’s FY20 RSUs upon cessation of his employment.
Malus and
clawback
Amongst other things, the Board may elect to forfeit any unvested awards (i.e. malus) or recoup any vested and paid awards (i.e.
clawback) in the following circumstances:
• a participant has engaged in serious misconduct (including but not limited to fraud, dishonesty, gross negligence or a
breach of employment conditions);
• a material misstatement in, or omission from the Group’s financial statements or a misstatement of an applicable vesting
condition;
• a participant has acted or failed to act in a way that has contributed to material reputational damage to the Group; or
•
in the opinion of the Board, acting in good faith, all or part of the initial RSU award is no longer justified having regard to the
circumstances or information which has subsequently come to light after a grant was made.
Change of
control
Where a transaction or event is proposed that, in the opinion of the Board, may result in a person becoming entitled to control
of Afterpay Limited, the Board retains the discretion (to be exercised consistently with the ASX Listing Rules) to determine that
a particular treatment will apply to unvested RSUs.
Where this discretion is not exercised and a change of control event (as defined) occurs, any unvested RSUs will vest on a pro-
rata basis to time, based on the portion of the vesting period that has passed at the time of the change of control event (unless
the Board determines otherwise).
Voting and
dividends
Hedging
RSUs do not carry any dividend or voting rights.
Participants are not permitted to enter into any arrangement for the purpose of hedging, borrowing or otherwise affecting their
economic exposure to RSUs.
62
5.3 FY20 short-term incentive outcomes
5.3.1 Overview of FY20 STI outcomes
The maximum STI awards that Executive KMP were eligible to receive in respect of FY20 are set out in Table 6
below.
As noted above, the Co-Founders elected not to be eligible for an STI award under the new FY20 Executive
KMP framework. The maximum FY20 STI opportunity levels for the remaining Executive KMP are positioned
conservatively relative to market.
FY20 STI awards were assessed against a balanced scorecard of annual objectives that are aligned with the
Group’s value drivers, achievement of our challenging mid-term plan and generation of long-term value for
our shareholders (with the introduction of new measures relating to “Innovation” and “People” to reflect their
importance to our business). The FY20 STI scorecard is set out at section 5.3.2 below.
Despite the Group’s strong performance, the Global CFO was the only Executive KMP to receive an STI in
FY20. In respect of other Executive KMP: the Co-Founders elected not to be eligible for an STI award
under the new framework; the Board determined that the former Global Chief Operating Officer will not
receive an STI; and the former Group Head was not eligible.
The final vesting outcome against the FY20 STI scorecard (for the Global CFO’s STI) is outlined in section 5.3.2.
The final outcome reflects the Group’s strong performance including exceptional growth across all key
platform metrics, strong risk management outcomes, and a strong EBITDA result notwithstanding the
accelerated investment in global expansion.
The Board is comfortable that the FY20 STI outcomes strike an appropriate balance between the Group’s
strong FY20 performance as well as recognising the broader implications of COVID-19 on the community.
Table 6
FY20 STI opportunities and outcomes
FY20 STI Opportunities and Outcomes
Executive KMP
Anthony Eisen3
Nick Molnar3
Luke Bortoli
Maximum STI
opportunity1 ($)
Maximum STI
opportunity (% of
fixed remuneration2)
STI awarded
% of maximum
FY20 STI
awarded
% of maximum
FY20 STI award
forfeited
N/A
N/A
$400,000
N/A
N/A
133%
43%
N/A
N/A
$344,000
-
N/A
N/A
86%
-
N/A
N/A
14%
100%
Frerk-Malte Feller (part year)4
$300,000
1. These figures represent the maximum STI that can be earned by Executive KMP when performance targets are met.
2. Total fixed remuneration is based on the figures disclosed in section 5.2. For the Global CFO, this represents total fixed cash remuneration. For the former
Global Chief Operating Officer, this represents the sum of fixed cash remuneration and the face value of RSUs.
3. As noted above, the Co-Founders volunteered not to be eligible for an STI award under the FY20 framework.
4. The Board determined that the former Global Chief Operating Officer will not receive an STI award for FY20.
63
5.3.2 Performance against the FY20 STI scorecard
Performance against the FY20 STI scorecard is set out below. Targets are set at challenging levels to ensure Executive KMP are rewarded for exceptional performance. For each
measure, 50% vesting occurs at threshold with up to 100% vesting at target (with straight line vesting in between). No vesting occurs below threshold. Threshold performance
is generally set at 90% of target. Final STI outcomes are subject to a Board discretion modifier for “doing the right thing” and assessment of the quality of results.
Figure 2
FY20 STI scorecard and performance
Measure
Weight
Strategic Link
Vesting Outcome1
Outcome Commentary
Financial measures (50%)
Threshold (50% vesting) Target (100% vesting)
GMV
(i.e. Underlying Sales)
EBITDA
25%
25%
Non-financial measures (50%)
Strong financial performance, including
EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) and GMV
(i.e. Underlying Sales), is critical to delivering
long-term shareholder value.
)
Active Customers
%
0
2
(
Net Transaction
Loss (NTL)
10%
10%
At Afterpay, we are committed to putting our
customers first and achieving our mission to
power an economy in which everyone wins.
Execution of our mid-term plan is underpinned
by strong customer expansion annually. STI
measures reflect both the number of active
customers and customer defaults.
Active Merchants
10%
Expansion of our global merchant base and
supporting more leading retailers is core to our
long-term success.
Achievement of
FY20 product
development
roadmap
milestones
)
Employee Net
%
0
1
(
Promoter Score
(eNPS)
10%
10%
We are a platform. We are focussed on
providing new and valuable experiences to
customers and merchants. “Innovation”
reflects achievement of key product,
technology and network build milestones.
Our people are at the heart of everything we
do. A high-performing and engaged workforce
are critical to delivering superior returns for our
shareholders. The Board will continue to review
our people measure (and other STI measures)
to ensure they are fit for purpose.
s
r
e
m
o
t
s
u
C
s
t
n
a
h
c
r
e
M
n
o
i
t
a
v
o
n
n
I
l
e
p
o
e
P
)
%
0
1
(
)
%
0
1
(
1. Vesting bar chart is a guide only and not to scale.
FY20 STI outcome 86%
64
While GMV of $11.1bn was marginally below the FY20 target, it was more than double FY19 (up
112%). The doubling of GMV was driven by growth across all regions both before and after the
impact of COVID-19 began to be felt across the regions in which the Group operates.
EBITDA (excluding Significant Items) of $44.4m was above target and up 73% on FY19,
notwithstanding the significant planned investment in global expansion.
Active Customers of 9.9m exceeded the FY20 target. Key Active Customer milestones were
achieved in both the US and UK, with the US reaching 5.6m and the UK 1.0m. Customer growth
and engagement was also strong in ANZ, our most mature market, which reached 3.3m active
customers.
NTL of 0.4% exceeded the FY20 target, as a result of the increasing sophistication in risk
management and a higher proportion of returning customers.
During FY20, the merchant acquisition strategy shifted to actively prioritising the onboarding of
Enterprise merchants to drive GMV and customer growth. This strategy was successful and
Afterpay onboarded significant marquee Enterprise brands including eBay, American Eagle,
Finish Line, ASOS and Marks & Spencer amongst others. Globally, SMB merchants are larger in
number than Enterprise and the target was not adjusted for the change in priority to the lower
volume Enterprise category. Overall active merchants grew by 72% on FY19, to 55.4k.
Achieved delivery of key product plan milestones including: preparing for Canada expansion in Q1
FY21; US in-store launch; international rollout of cross-border trade; variable first payment;
streamlining merchant integration via virtual card; risk innovations; limit transparency; and a
loyalty program that rewards customers for using the service responsibly.
Achieved positive results in employee engagement surveys assessed using the CultureAMP
methodology and continued to prioritize the health and wellbeing of employees through COVID-
19 including providing robust working from home arrangements.
5.3.3 FY20 STI terms - further detail
The table below outlines the key terms and conditions applying to the STI arrangements for Executive KMP
during FY20.
Table 7
Description of key terms of FY20 Executive KMP STI
FY20 STI – Key Terms
Term
Further Detail
Performance
period
STI awards are assessed over the 12-month financial year. Any STI award payments are made after performance is
tested at the end of the performance period.
Assessment of
performance
measures
Performance against the scorecard measures is assessed annually by the Board based on recommendations from the
People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee (with input from the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director)
after the end of the performance period, as part of the broader performance review process for each Executive KMP.
Financial and non-financial measures are assessed quantitatively against predetermined benchmarks where
applicable. When testing financial measures, financial results are extracted from the Group's accounting system.
These methods of assessing performance were chosen because they are, as far as practicable, objective and fair. The
use of the Group’s accounting system ensures the integrity of the measure and alignment with the true financial
performance of the Group.
In determining final outcomes, the Board will also have regard to the quality of the result in each category (facilitated
by contra / supplementary indicators, including customer complaints and customer Net Promoter Score (NPS)).
The Board retains absolute discretion in respect of STI awards and final vesting outcomes. As part of its overarching
discretion, the Board may reduce final STI outcomes having regard to affordability considerations and the Group’s
financial performance over the period.
In addition to this overarching discretion, final STI outcomes will be subject to a Board discretion modifier for “doing
the right thing” whereby the Board may make downward adjustments (including to zero) for regulatory issues,
conduct issues, brand and reputational issues, and non-financial and financial risk issues.
Subject to Board discretion, if an Executive KMP ceases to be employed:
•
•
in “bad leaver” circumstances (e.g. termination for cause) during the performance period, the Executive KMP will
not be eligible for an STI award (unless the Board determines otherwise); or
in “good leaver” circumstances (i.e. other than as a bad leaver), the treatment of their unvested STI awards will be at
the absolute discretion of the Board.
Board discretion
modifier for
“doing the right
thing”
Treatment on
cessation of
employment
Malus and
clawback
The Board may elect to forfeit an Executive KMP’s FY20 STI award (i.e. malus) or recoup any vested and paid awards (i.e.
clawback) in the circumstances specified in respect of the FY20 RSUs at section 5.2.2.
Change of control Where a transaction or event is proposed that, in the opinion of the Board, may result in a person becoming entitled to
control of Afterpay Limited during the performance period, the Board retains the discretion (to be exercised
consistently with the ASX Listing Rules) to determine that a particular treatment will apply to STI awards.
Where this discretion is not exercised and a change of control event (as defined) occurs during the performance
period, any unvested STI awards will vest on a pro-rata basis to time, based on the portion of the vesting period that
has passed at the time of the change of control event (unless the Board determines otherwise).
5.3.4 Withheld FY19 STI awards
As disclosed in the FY19 Remuneration Report, while the Board assessed performance of the FY19 STI awards,
the Executive KMP volunteered for their STI awards to be withheld until the outcomes of the final report of
the external AUSTRAC audit were known. The Board reserved the discretion to make any adjustments to final
STI outcomes (as appropriate), having regard to the outcomes of the AUSTRAC audit. FY19 STI awards will
continue to be withheld until the outcome of the final AUSTRAC determination is known.
65
•
•
•
5.4.3 FY20 LTI key terms – further detail
The table below outlines the key terms of the LTI awards granted to Executive KMP during FY20.
Table 9
Key terms of FY20 LTI awards granted to Executive KMP
Long-Term Incentive (FY20) – Key Terms
Term
Further Detail
Entitlement
Subject to the satisfaction of the performance conditions and payment of the exercise price, each LTI option entitles the
holder to one fully paid ordinary share in Afterpay Limited (or a cash equivalent payment at the discretion of the Board).
Allocation
methodology
The number of LTI options granted was calculated by dividing the participant’s dollar value LTI opportunity for FY20 (as
outlined in section 5.4.2 above) by the market value of the options.
The market value of options was calculated by using a Binomial Model, based on the 10-day VWAP of Afterpay Limited
shares in the period immediately following the release of full year results and the exercise price of the options outlined
below. The market value of options is not reduced for the likelihood of performance hurdles being met.
Exercise price
Participants are required to pay an exercise price to exercise their LTI options upon vesting. In respect of the FY20 LTI
awards, the exercise price for the:
• Co-Founders is $37.31. This was set at a 20% premium to the market value of Afterpay Limited shares, equal to the 10-
day VWAP of Afterpay Limited shares in the period immediately following the release of 2019 full year results; and
• Global Chief Operating Officer is $31.09. This was set at the market value of Afterpay Limited shares, being equal to the
10-day VWAP of Afterpay Limited shares in the period immediately following the release of 2019 full year results.
Expiry date
The FY20 LTI options will expire on 1 July 2024.
Performance
period
Performance
conditions and
vesting schedule
The performance period is 3 years, commencing on 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2022.
The options are subject to performance testing against the following performance conditions over the performance
period:
• GMV (i.e. Underlying Sales) – 50%. GMV is a measure of the total order value processed on the Afterpay platform; and
• Afterpay NTM – 50%. Afterpay NTM reflects Afterpay income less variable costs, which includes cost of sales, NTL, and
direct receivables funding costs. A reconciliation of statutory gross profit to Afterpay NTM is included in the Operating
and Financial Review of this Annual Report.
GMV performance condition
The vesting schedule in respect of the GMV performance condition is set out below. Vesting will occur on a straight-line
basis between target and maximum levels of performance. No vesting occurs if target performance is not achieved.
Level of
performance
Vesting of GMV-target
related measure (%)
GMV (targets)
Target
Maximum
50%
100%
$15b in final year of performance period.
$25b in final year of performance period.
Afterpay NTM performance condition
The vesting schedule in respect of the Afterpay NTM performance condition is set out below. Vesting will occur on a
straight-line basis between target and maximum levels of performance. No vesting occurs if target performance is not
achieved.
Specific targets in respect of Afterpay NTM will be disclosed at the end of the performance period due to commercial
sensitivity. A transparent disclosure of the calculation of Afterpay NTM (that reconciles to the statutory accounts) will also
be provided at the end of the performance period.
Level of
performance
Vesting of NTM-target
related measure (%)
Afterpay NTM (targets)
Target
50%
Maximum
100%
Targets to be disclosed at the end of the performance period
due to commercial sensitivity.
Targets to be disclosed at the end of the performance period
due to commercial sensitivity.
Treatment on
cessation of
employment
Malus and
clawback
Change of
control
Voting and
dividend rights
Hedging
Subject to Board discretion, if an Executive KMP ceases to be employed:
•
•
in “bad leaver” circumstances (e.g. termination for cause) during the performance period, all of the unvested LTI
options will lapse (unless the Board determines otherwise); and
in “good leaver” circumstances (i.e. other than as a bad leaver), the treatment of unvested LTI options will be at the
discretion of the Board (subject to applicable law). The Board’s intention is that the LTI options would be pro-rated to
time served in employment and left on foot to be tested and vest in the ordinary course.
The Board may elect to forfeit any unvested LTI awards (i.e. malus) or recoup any vested and paid LTI awards (i.e.
clawback) in the circumstances specified in respect of the FY20 RSUs at section 5.2.2.
Where a transaction or event is proposed that, in the opinion of the Board, may result in a person becoming entitled to
control of Afterpay Limited, the Board retains the discretion (to be exercised consistently with the ASX Listing Rules) to
determine that a particular treatment will apply to unvested LTI awards.
Where this discretion is not exercised and a change of control event (as defined) occurs, any unvested LTI awards will
vest on a pro-rata basis to time served in employment, based on the portion of the vesting period that has passed at the
time of the change of control event (unless the Board determines otherwise).
LTI awards do not carry any dividend or voting rights over the performance period.
Participants are not permitted to enter into any arrangement for the purpose of hedging, borrowing or otherwise
affecting their economic exposure to LTI options.
67
5.5 Treatment of equity arrangements for the former Global Chief
Operating Officer
As noted in section 3, the former Global Chief Operating Officer, Frerk-Malte (Malte) Feller, ceased as an
Executive KMP on 12 June 2020 and will cease as an employee of the Group on 25 November 2020.
The Board determined that Malte will be considered a “good leaver” upon cessation of employment and his
equity arrangements would be treated as set out in Table 10 below.
Table 10
Treatment of equity arrangements (the former Global Chief Operating Officer)
Equity Awards
Treatment on cessation of employment
FY20 RSUs
(refer section 5.2)
In accordance with the terms of the awards, the first tranche of service-based RSUs vested in the ordinary course on 1
July 2020. The remaining two tranches of the RSUs will lapse on cessation of employment in November 2020.
FY20 LTI
(refer section 5.4)
The Board exercised its discretion to pro-rata the LTI options to time served, and will leave one-third on foot to be tested
against the original performance hurdles and vest in the ordinary course at the end of the original three year
performance period (being 30 June 2022). The remaining two-thirds will lapse on cessation of employment in November
2020.
Buy-out
Payment
During FY20 and as previously disclosed to the market, the former Global Chief Operating Officer was granted a “buy-out
payment” (Buy-out Payment) in the form of RSUs with a total face value of $900,000. The Buy-out Payment was granted
to compensate Malte for equity foregone at his former employer (for which all hurdles other than employment had been
satisfied) and to align his interests with the interests of the Group and its shareholders.
The Buy-out Payment was considered necessary to attract an executive of Malte’s calibre and wealth of experience at
fast-growing, globally expanding technology enterprises including Facebook, eBay and PayPal, to the Group.
Consistent with market practice, the number of RSUs granted was determined by dividing the face value of the award
by the 10-day VWAP of Afterpay Limited shares up to (and excluding) Malte’s commencement date of 1 July 2019. All of
the other terms of the Buy-out Payment (including the vesting schedule) were consistent with the FY20 RSUs (as
outlined in section 5.2.2).
In accordance with the terms of the award, the first tranche of the “Buy-out Payment” vested at the original vesting date
of 1 July 2020. Given the purpose of the award of RSUs was to compensate for equity foregone by Malte at his former
employer (for which all hurdles other than employment had been satisfied) and that Malte was leaving in “good leaver”
circumstances, the Board exercised its discretion to allow the remaining two tranches of his “Buy-out Payment” to
remain on foot to vest at the original vesting dates of 1 July 2021 and 1 July 2022.
5.6
Legacy one-off equity awards
5.6.1 Overview of legacy one-off equity awards
As part of the Group’s legacy executive remuneration arrangements, Executive KMP received one-off grants
of equity (in the form of options, loans shares or rights) at the time they commenced employment with the
Group, which were subject to continued employment and the achievement, in some cases, of KPIs.
The Group’s legacy one-off equity awards reflected the need to compete for talent (as a small company with
limited financial resources) in the global technology sector where these arrangements are commonly used
and provided a strong retention mechanism for key talent during the start-up phase by requiring Executive
KMP to remain employed until the end of the vesting period to realise the incentive.
However, as noted above, the Group has transitioned to a formal performance-tested LTI program under the
new FY20 remuneration framework (refer section 5.4) and no new one-off equity awards were granted to
Executive KMP during FY20.
68
5.6.2 Legacy one-off equity awards vesting in FY20
Group Head (Former)
The Group’s shareholders approved a grant of options to the former Group Head (David Hancock) at the 2018
AGM (in satisfaction of David’s contractual award arrangements). The arrangements were necessary to attract
an executive of David’s expertise and experience to oversee the merger of Afterpay and Touchcorp.
The second (and final) tranche of these options (1,492,555 options with an exercise price of $2.70 and expiry
date of 1 September 2022) were subject to the achievement of KPIs and David’s continued employment with
the Group. David’s KPIs included financial KPIs relating to EBITDA and revenue, and non-financial KPIs in
respect of customer NPS, merchant NPS and employee NPS.
The second (and final) tranche of options vested on the vesting date at 1 September 2019. However, as a
consequence of the AUSTRAC audit in 2019, 200,000 of these options were withheld pending the outcomes
of the final report of the external audit and AUSTRAC’s final determination. The Board reserves discretion to
lapse any of these options. These options will continue to be withheld until the outcome of the final AUSTRAC
determination is known.
Global CFO
In June 2018, Global CFO Luke Bortoli was granted 1,350,000 options under the Group’s legacy one-off equity
arrangements (with an exercise price of $5.00 and expiry date of 31 December 2022). The options were eligible
to vest in equal tranches over three years.
The options were necessary to attract an executive of Luke’s calibre, skillset and experience to the Group in
May 2018, with Luke having held a number of senior finance and strategy roles in the technology / gaming
sector and investment banking.
The second tranche of Luke’s options vested in full on 1 June 2020, reflecting that the service conditions were
met and certain individual KPIs were achieved, including managing financing costs to below budget targets,
overseeing various capital management initiatives to strengthen the Group’s balance sheet, as well as
continuing to build a scalable global Finance function to support the Group’s global growth aspirations.
Luke’s final tranche is eligible to vest on 1 June 2021.
69
5.6.3 Legacy one-off equity awards terms – further detail
Table 11 below outlines the key terms and conditions applying to the legacy one-off equity award
arrangements in respect of Executive KMP vesting during the Reporting Period. No one-off equity grants
were made during FY20 to Executive KMP (as the Group has transitioned onto its new FY20 remuneration
framework).
Table 11
Key terms of legacy one-off equity awards for Executive KMP
Legacy one-off equity awards – Key terms
Element
Overview
Form of award
Vesting period
Description
Under the Group’s legacy arrangements, Executive KMP were eligible to receive one-off equity awards (in the
form of options, loan shares or rights) in Afterpay Limited equity at the time they commenced employment.
Options entitle the holder to one share in the Group for every option exercised, subject to payment of the exercise
price at the end of the vesting period and continued employment. Options are granted for nil consideration.
Option awards were negotiated on a bilateral basis with varying vesting periods for each individual Executive
KMP. Options granted to Executive KMP typically vest in two or three equal tranches after one, two or three years
following the grant date (as appropriate).
Vesting conditions
Option awards are subject to continued employment at the end of the vesting period and only convert to shares
after payment of the exercise price.
In some cases, options may also be subject to the achievement of KPIs over the vesting period. KPIs may take the
form of financial and non-financial performance conditions that are aligned with the Group’s financial, strategic,
capital management and governance plans over the vesting period (in addition to continued employment).
Measurement of
performance
conditions
Performance against KPIs is assessed for each member of the Executive KMP after each of the relevant vesting
dates by the Board, based on recommendations from the People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee and
the Chief Executive Officer (where appropriate).
Disposal restrictions
Options are subject to dealing restrictions until they are exercised. Upon exercise and payment of the exercise
price, participants are allocated fully paid ordinary shares in the Group.
Participants are free to deal with the shares allocated to them following vesting (and exercise where applicable)
subject to the Group’s Securities Trading Policy.
Treatment on
cessation of
employment
Change of control
Clawback
Options only vest at the applicable vesting date if the participant:
• remains employed with the Group on that date; or
• has ceased employment as a ‘‘good leaver’’ and the Board exercises discretion to allow the options to vest.
If a takeover bid is made, or a scheme of arrangement, selective capital reduction or other transaction is initiated
that has an effect similar to a full takeover bid for shares in the Group, the Board has discretion to waive any
outstanding performance conditions.
The Board has clawback powers that it may exercise in specific circumstances if, for example, a participant has
acted fraudulently or unlawfully, or engaged in conduct in material breach of the Group's policies and codes of
conduct, and this contributed to the vesting of their options.
70
5.8 Actual remuneration snapshot
Table 13 below provides a summary of the actual take-home pay received by Executive KMP during the Reporting Period. Unlike the statutory remuneration tables in section
5.7, the below table has not been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Australian Accounting Standards and is unaudited. It is included on a voluntary basis to
show the remuneration actually received by Executive KMP during the Reporting Period.
The options vested and exercised in FY20 by the Global CFO represent the legacy one-off equity arrangements outlined in section 5.6.2. The value delivered from these options
is aligned with the value delivered to shareholders over the vesting period. As noted previously, the Group has now moved to a formal annual LTI program (subject to formal
performance hurdles assessed over a 3 year period).
Table 13
FY20—Actual Remuneration—Executive KMP
Actual Remuneration
KMP
Anthony Eisen
Nick Molnar
Luke Bortoli
Frerk-Malte Feller (part year)4
David Hancock (part year)5
Fixed remuneration1
(1)
Other monetary benefits
(2)
Non-monetary benefits2
(3)
Cash Bonus
(4)
495,897
489,353
321,199
300,620
82,336
-
-
-
100,000
-
-
79,861
9,797
71,056
-
-
-
-
-
-
Options vested and
exercised in FY203
(5)
Total actual remuneration
(1) + (2) + (3) + (4) + (5)
-
-
495,897
569,214
31,293,000
31,623,996
-
-
471,676
82,336
1. Fixed remuneration includes base salary and superannuation. This figure excludes the tranches of Malte’s FY20 RSUs and Buy-out Payment which vested on 1 July 2020, as vesting occurred during FY21.
2. Non-monetary benefits represent benefits such as insurance, rent and relocation expenses.
3. Options vested and exercised is calculated as the difference between the share price at the date of exercise less the exercise price, and includes options vested in prior years that were exercised in FY20.
4. Frerk-Malte Feller ceased as KMP on 12 June 2020. Malte’s other monetary benefits relate to a $100,000 one-off cash payment received at the commencement of his employment for his relocation from San Francisco to Sydney. Malte was not entitled
to an FY20 STI cash bonus.
5. David Hancock ceased as KMP on 8 October 2019.
72
6. Non-Executive Director Remuneration
6.1 Overview of FY20
6.1.1 COVID-19 response
One of our core strategic pillars is “Doing the Right Thing”. We are focussed on never losing sight of our key
stakeholders (including our customers, merchants, shareholders and other external parties). In this context, in
April 2020 the Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) elected to forego 20% of their Board base member and
Committee fees for three months from May 2020, reflecting the uncertain impact of COVID-19 on key
stakeholders and the community at that time.
6.1.2 Evolving composition of the Group’s Board
The Group is committed to ensuring it meets the highest standards of corporate governance and external
expectations, which includes the composition and independence of its Board.
As part of this commitment, the Group took a number of steps during FY20 towards its objective of having a
majority independent Board with an independent Chair.
Effective from 1 July 2019, Elana Rubin was appointed as Independent Interim Chair (with Anthony Eisen
transitioning from Executive Chairman to the role of Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director). On 25
May 2020, Elana was appointed permanently to the position of Independent Chair following her strong
performance as Interim Independent Chair and significant contribution to Afterpay as a Director since March
2017.
The Group also undertook a global search for additional Non-Executive Directors and was pleased to
announce the appointment of three independent Non-Executive Directors onto the Group’s Board: Gary
Briggs, Pat O’Sullivan and Sharon Rothstein, to complement and further strengthen the skillsets of the
Board’s existing high-calibre Directors.
Gary Briggs brings extensive marketing knowledge and expertise to the Group’s Board in the digital and
technology sectors. Gary has worked in a number of senior executive positions including, most recently, Chief
Marketing Officer at Facebook, as well as other marketing roles at industry leading technology companies
including Motorola Mobility, Google, eBay and PayPal. He also brings board experience as Chairman of
Hawkfish, and as a board member of Etsy and Petco.
Pat O’Sullivan also brings a wide range of experience to complement the current Afterpay Board, having
worked in various financial and operational roles in Ireland, the US, Australia and New Zealand for over 30
years across a number of sectors. Pat is also a seasoned Non-Executive Director, as Chairman of carsales.com
and previously a board member of a number of ASX-listed companies including APN Outdoor, iSentia, Marley
Spoon, iSelect and iiNet and was previously Chairman of HealthEngine.
Sharon Rothstein brings deep expertise and experience across leading consumer brands and her
background will provide the Board and management with key retailer insights and assist in the development
of new relationships and networks globally. Sharon is currently serving as Operating Partner at growth equity
firm Stripes Group, and previously held senior marketing positions at market leaders Starbucks and Sephora.
Sharon is currently a member of the Board of Yelp and InterContinental Hotels Group.
The composition of the Board has been significantly strengthened over FY20 and its composition will be
continually monitored going forward to ensure that the Board has the right mix of skills, expertise,
experience and values to support the Group’s continued growth, global expansion and long-term success
(refer section 2 of the Group’s FY20 Corporate Governance Statement for further detail).
73
6.2 Remuneration policy and arrangements
The Board sets the fees for its Non-Executive Directors in line with the key objectives of the Group’s Non-
Executive Director remuneration policy set out below. The People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee
makes recommendations to the Board regarding remuneration for Non-Executive Directors (refer section 7.1
for further detail regarding “Remuneration Governance”).
As in previous years, the Group’s Executive Directors (Anthony Eisen and Nick Molnar) are not entitled to be
paid Directors’ fees.
The Group does not make sign-on payments to new Non-Executive Directors nor provide for retirement
allowances / benefits for Non-Executive Directors (other than superannuation for Australian based Directors).
Figure 3 Non-Executive Director remuneration policy
Market competitive to secure and retain
talented, qualified Directors
Preserving and safeguarding
independence and impartiality
Aligning Director and security holder
interests
The Board’s policy is to remunerate Non-
Executive Directors at market-competitive
rates to attract and retain Non-Executive
Directors of the highest calibre and requisite
expertise having regard to:
Director remuneration consists of base fees,
and additional fees for the Chair and
members of any Board Committee (with
the exception of the role of independent
Chair who receives an all-inclusive fee).
•
fees paid by comparable companies;
• the size, complexity and international
spread of the Group’s operations; and
• the workload and time commitment of
Non-Executive Directors.
No element of Non-Executive Director
remuneration is “at risk” (i.e. Non-Executive
Directors are not entitled to any
performance-related remuneration) to
preserve the Directors' independence and
impartiality.1
Directors are encouraged to hold
securities in the Group to create
alignment between the interests of
Directors and shareholders.
A formal minimum shareholding policy
for Non-Executive Directors became
effective in FY20 to further strengthen
this alignment (refer section 6.4).
1. Clifford Rosenberg was granted options under legacy arrangements (in respect of pre-IPO advisory services and service on the Board of Afterpay at the time
of IPO), which were exchanged for APT options as part of the merger of the Afterpay and Touchcorp businesses. These relate to legacy one-off
arrangements and have now fully vested.
6.3 Fees and other benefits
6.3.1 Board and Committee fees
The table below sets out the fees (inclusive of superannuation) payable to the Non-Executive Directors of the
Group in respect of FY20 (i.e. effective 1 July 2019). Committee fees are paid in addition to the Non-Executive
Director base fee, with the exception of fees payable to the Independent Chair who receives an “all-inclusive
fee” (i.e. is not eligible for additional Committee fees).
As outlined in the FY19 Remuneration Report, the Board undertook a review of Non-Executive Directors’ fees
during FY19, having regard to market data provided by independent remuneration consultants. The Board
and Committee fees for FY20 were set having regard to the following considerations:
•
•
the need to be market competitive for world-class Non-Executive Director talent. It is critical that the
Group’s Non-Executive Director fees are set at competitive levels (having regard to the Group’s current
market capitalisation, complexity, geographic spread and the global technology sector within which it
operates) in order to support the attraction and retention of high calibre Non-Executive Directors, such as the
Group’s new Non-Executive Director appointments of Gary Briggs, Pat O’Sullivan and Sharon Rothstein; and
the significant workload of directors in light of the international expansion of the Group into new markets
(including the UK, Canada and further proposed new markets) and the increasing complexity of the
regulatory environment in which the Group operates.
As shown in the table below, the Group’s fees are positioned conservatively relative to market and their
appropriateness will continue to be reviewed going forward. In addition, to support the attraction and
retention of overseas directors (particularly out of the US where director fee levels are significantly higher
than Australian fees), the Board retains the discretion to provide overseas Directors with an uplift to the base
member fee (as set out below) of up to 50% (as required). This uplift was provided to Gary Briggs and Sharon
Rothstein as new US-based director appointments in FY20.
74
Table 14
FY20 Non-Executive Director fees
Board and Committee fees (per annum)
Chair of the Board – base fee
Non-Executive Director – base fee
Committee Chair (Audit, Risk & Compliance)
Committee Chair (People, Remuneration & Nomination)
Committee Member (Audit, Risk & Compliance)
Committee Member (People, Remuneration &
Nomination)
FY20 (effective 1 July 2019)1
$350,000 (all inclusive)3
$150,0004
$30,000
$25,000
$15,000
Median fee ($) in
comparator group2
$495,000
$170,000
$41,500
$36,000
$20,300
$12,500
$19,500
1. These fees are on an annualised basis and do not include the temporary reduction in Board base member and Committee fees as noted in section 6.1.1.
2. These figures represent the median fee (i.e. 50th percentile) of a comparator group comprising companies with a market capitalisation ranging from $4.3b
to $15.9b based on a 12 month rolling average market capitalisation up to 1 June 2020. The comparator group was selected based on 50% to 200% of APT’s
market capitalisation of $8.3b on a 12 month rolling average up to and excluding 1 June 2020. The Group’s spot market capitalisation at the end of FY20
(based on the Group’s closing share price of $60.99 on 30 June 2020) of $16.3b was significantly higher than $8.3b. Any temporary reductions in NED fees
within the comparator group as a consequence of COVID-19 have been excluded from the market data.
3. Elana Rubin assumed the role of Independent Interim Chair effective 1 July 2019 and was appointed as Independent Chair effective 25 May 2020. Elana’s fee
is all-inclusive, i.e. she will not receive additional Committee fees for permanent Committees.
4. The Board will retain the discretion to provide overseas directors with an uplift to the base member fee of up to 50% (as required).
In addition to Board fees, Non-Executive Directors are entitled to be reimbursed for all reasonable business-
related expenses, including travel, as may be reasonably incurred in the discharge of their duties.
6.3.2 Aggregate fee pool
The FY20 aggregate fee pool for Non-Executive Directors’ fees (including Committee fees) is $1,800,000 and
was approved by the Group’s shareholders at the 2019 AGM. Afterpay’s aggregate fee pool is positioned
conservatively relative to market, with the median fee pool of companies within the market capitalisation
comparator group (noted above) being $2,400,000.
6.3.3 Further information
In late FY19, the Group’s subsidiary (Afterpay Pty Ltd) received a notice requiring it to appoint an external
auditor to carry out an audit in respect of its AML / CTF Compliance. The Group takes its regulatory
responsibilities very seriously and established a dedicated AML / CTF Review Sub-Committee, charged with
assisting the Board with the oversight and management of the associated external audit program.
Elana Rubin was charged with leading the dedicated Sub-Committee. In recognition of the additional duties,
responsibilities and workload associated with this role, Elana received a special exertion allowance of $10,000
per month (inclusive of superannuation) for a period of 5 months only from July 2019 to November 2019.
However, as noted above, Elana does not receive additional fees for permanent Committees.
6.4 Minimum shareholding requirements
As outlined in the FY19 Remuneration Report, the Group’s Board resolved to introduce a minimum
shareholding requirement (which became effective during FY20). The purpose of this requirement was to
facilitate share ownership and further strengthen the alignment between Directors and Group’s
shareholders. The table below sets out key information regarding this policy.
75
Table 15
Overview of minimum shareholding requirements
Minimum shareholding requirement
Quantum
Timeframe
1 x base member fee1
Non-Executive Directors are required to build a shareholding with a monetary value equal to
1 x base member fee within a three-year timeframe, being the later of:
• three years from the effective date of the policy of 16 October 2019; and
• three years from date of commencement as a Non-Executive Director for those appointed
after 16 October 2019
1. As noted above, the Group’s base member fee is currently AUD$150,000. In the final Policy adopted by the Board, the base member fee is calculated as
gross of income tax (rather than net of income tax) to facilitate greater share ownership amongst Non-Executive Directors
The shareholdings of the Group’s Non-Executive Directors at the end of the Reporting Period are outlined in
detail in section 7.4 of this Report. Elana Rubin, Dana Stalder and Pat O’Sullivan have shareholdings well in
excess of the minimum shareholding requirement (being 1 x base member fee of AUD$150,000). Gary Briggs
and Sharon Rothstein, who were appointed as Non-Executive Directors on 1 January 2020 and 1 June 2020
respectively, have not yet met this requirement.
6.5 Non-Executive Directors – statutory remuneration
The fees paid or payable to the Non-Executive Directors of the Group in respect of FY20 are set out in the
table below. These fees include the temporary reduction in Board base member and Committee fees as
noted in section 6.1.1 above.
Table 16
Non-Executive Directors – statutory remuneration
Afterpay remuneration ($)
for the years ending 30 June 2020
and 30 June 2019
Financial
year
Short-term
Benefits
Long-term
Benefits
Share-based
payments
Salary & Fees
Superannuation
Options
Total
Elana Rubin
Dana Stalder
Clifford Rosenberg (part year)
Gary Briggs (part year)
Pat O’Sullivan (part year)
Sharon Rothstein (part year)
Total
2020
2019
2020
20191
20202
2019
20204
20205
20206
2020
2019
377,832
109,589
169,500
90,000
170,996
105,000
105,000
50,266
15,833
889,427
304,589
10,501
10,411
-
-
-
-
-
4,775
-
15,276
10,411
-
388,333
-
120,000
-
169,500
-
90,000
-
170,996
1,7903
106,790
-
-
-
-
105,000
55,041
15,833
904,703
1,790
316,790
1. Dana Stalder was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on 24 January 2018.
2. Clifford Rosenberg ceased as a Non-Executive Director effective 24 May 2020.
3. Clifford Rosenberg was granted options under legacy arrangements (in respect of pre-IPO advisory services and service on the Board of Afterpay at the time
of IPO), which were exchanged for APT options as part of the merger of the Afterpay and Touchcorp businesses. These relate to legacy one-off
arrangements and have now fully vested.
4. Gary Briggs was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on 1 January 2020. As a newly appointed overseas based director, the base member fee payable to
Gary Briggs included an uplift of 50% to the Board member fee payable to Australia based directors.
5. Pat O’Sullivan was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on 1 March 2020.
6. Sharon Rothstein was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on 1 June 2020. As a newly appointed overseas based director, the base member fee payable
to Sharon Rothstein included an uplift of 50% to the Board member fee payable to Australian based directors.
76
In recognition of the value we place on our people at Afterpay, during FY20, the Board resolved to expand the
Remuneration & Nomination Committee to the People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee, with
additional oversight and responsibilities in respect of monitoring corporate culture, employee engagement,
and other people-related policies (including talent identification, training and development, and diversity).
These expanded responsibilities were reflected in the People, Remuneration & Nomination Charter.
The People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee represents one element of the Group’s robust
remuneration governance framework (summarised below), which aims to ensure that the Group’s
remuneration practices are fair, reasonable, aligned with best practice and consistent with the Group’s
remuneration principles outlined in section 4.1.
In addition to maintaining a robust remuneration governance framework, Afterpay meets with shareholders
and proxy advisors regularly in relation to feedback on remuneration practices and outcomes.
Figure 4 Overview of the Group’s remuneration governance framework
Afterpay Board
Review and approve remuneration policy and principles, remuneration framework for executives and Non-Executive
Directors, and specific remuneration outcomes for Executive KMP (including exercise of discretion).
People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee
Role and Responsibilities
The Board has adopted a Remuneration Policy. In line with that Policy, the People, Remuneration & Nomination
Committee is responsible for assisting the Board to set the Remuneration Policy and determine the appropriate
remuneration for Directors and senior management. The People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee refers to
the Policy when developing Board recommendations about the structure and quantum of Executive KMP
remuneration, as well as final outcomes.
The People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee Charter sets out the Committee's role and responsibilities,
composition, structure and membership requirements. As noted above, the People, Remuneration & Nomination
Committee’s responsibilities were expanded during FY20, which was reflected in the Committee’s Charter.
Composition
It is critical that the People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee is independent of management when making
decisions affecting employee remuneration. Accordingly, the People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee
consists entirely of Non-Executive Directors, all of whom are independent. Where appropriate, the Group’s two
Executive Directors (Anthony Eisen and Nick Molnar), Global Human Resources Director, Global Head of
Remuneration and Benefits, and Global CFO attend Committee meetings. However, they do not participate in formal
decision-making or in discussions relating to their own remuneration.
The People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee also has appropriate access to the Chief Enterprise Risk Officer
and Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee to ensure that risk considerations (both financial and non-financial) are
reflected in final remuneration outcomes for Executive KMP.
Management
Remuneration Advisers
Proposals on executive remuneration outcomes and
implementing remuneration policies
External and independent remuneration advice and
information (refer section 7.2 for further detail).
For further details of the composition and responsibilities of the People, Remuneration & Nomination
Committee (including a copy of the Committee’s Charter), please refer to the Corporate Governance section
on our website (https://www.afterpay.com/en-AU/corporate-governance/).
77
7.2 Use of remuneration consultants
The People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee (through the Chair of the Committee) may seek and
consider advice from external advisers from time to time to assist the Committee to discharge its duties. Any
advice from consultants is used as a reference point by the Committee and the Board and does not serve as a
substitute for thorough consideration by the Non-Executive Directors.
During the Reporting Period, KPMG was engaged by the People, Remuneration & Nomination Committee to
provide independent advice on a range of matters. In FY20, KPMG provided remuneration recommendations
as defined in section 9B of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the structure and quantum of Executive
KMP remuneration, as well as advice in respect of remuneration arrangements of Executive KMP on
termination of employment. KPMG was paid $95,000, excluding GST, for these services.
The Board is satisfied that the recommendations were made free from undue influence by the member or
members of Executive KMP to whom the recommendations relate. In addition to adhering to Board-
approved protocols, KPMG provided a formal declaration in this regard to the Chair of the People,
Remuneration & Nomination Committee.
KPMG as a firm also provided other advice relating to the provision of data and market practice as well as
legal, tax, accounting, governance, external communications and engagement, and sustainability services
during FY20. KPMG was paid a total of $844,368, excluding GST, and disbursements for services provided to
the Group during FY20.
7.3 Details of Executive Service Agreements
All Executive KMP have a written Executive Service Agreement with the Group. The key terms of these
agreements are detailed in the table below.
As previously disclosed, updates to the terms of the Executive Service Agreements of the Co-Founders were
made following the 2019 AGM to reflect best practice and to be in line with their new roles from 1 July 2019.
Table 17
Key terms of Executive KMP contracts in FY20
Executive service agreements
Element
Duration
Further detail
Ongoing term
Periods of notice required to
terminate
Either party may terminate the contract by giving:
• six months’ written notice for Anthony Eisen and Nick Molnar; and
• three months’ written notice for Luke Bortoli and Frerk-Malte Feller.
For all Executive KMP, the Group may terminate the service agreement immediately
without notice in certain circumstances, including (but not limited to) where the relevant
Executive KMP engages in a serious breach of agreement or serious misconduct.
Termination payments
Members of the Executive KMP are not entitled to any termination payments. A payment
may be made in lieu of notice at the discretion of the Board where termination occurs other
than for cause.
1. As noted in sections 3 and 5.5, by mutual agreement, it was agreed that Frerk-Malte Feller would work out an extended notice period on a passive basis
from 12 June 2020 to 25 November 2020 to facilitate the transition of his role (as required). He will cease employment with the Group on 25 November 2020.
As noted in section 3, Afterpay’s former Group Head and Executive Director (David Hancock) ceased as a
Director and KMP of Afterpay Limited on 8 October 2019.
In order to facilitate the transition of his role to the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, and other
members of the leadership team, a variation was made to David’s executive service agreement (effective 1
July 2019) where he was employed in the role of Senior Group Advisor reporting to the Chief Executive Officer
and, if requested, the Board.
78
In accordance with his varied service agreement:
•
the term of David’s employment in this role was for a period of 6 months (i.e. until 31 December 2019) or until
terminated by either party, with an option to extend the term of his employment for an additional period of
time, as agreed in writing by both parties; and
• during this 6 month term, David’s employment could be terminated by the Group by providing a payment in
lieu of notice in respect of the remaining balance of the 6 month term. With the exception of a payment in
lieu of notice, David was not entitled to any other termination payments (e.g. redundancy payments or other
compensation).
By mutual agreement, David’s employment ceased with the Group on 8 October 2019 and he received fixed
remuneration and statutory entitlements up to that date and no other compensation.
7.4 Executive KMP and Director share ownership
The two tables below set out the number of shares held directly, indirectly or beneficially by Directors and
Executive KMP (including their related parties).
As disclosed to the market in July 2020, concurrent with the Group’s Share Purchase Plan, the Co-Founders
each agreed to sell 2.05 million shares, representing 10% of their respective holdings in the Group. Anthony
and Nick remain fully committed to Afterpay and remain the two largest shareholders in the Group.
Table 18. Movements in shareholdings not held under an employee share plan
Non-Executive Directors
Elana Rubin
Dana Stalder
Opening balance
1-Jul-19
Purchase of shares
Disposal of shares
57,141
-
7,706
19,300
-
-
Balance
30-Jun-20
64,847
19,300
Clifford Rosenberg (part year)
650,574
900,085
(100,000)
1,450,6591
Gary Briggs (part year)
Pat O’Sullivan (part year)
Sharon Rothstein (part year)
Executive KMP
Anthony Eisen
Nick Molnar
Luke Bortoli
Frerk-Malte Feller (part year)
-2
-3
-4
20,450,574
20,450,574
-
-
David Hancock (part year)
950,000
-
7,169
-
85
85
-
-
-
-
-
900,000
(900,000)
-
-
-
-
-
7,169
-
20,450,659
20,450,659
-
-
950,0005
1. Ending balance at 24 May 2020, being the date that Clifford Rosenberg ceased as a Non-Executive Director.
2. Opening balance at 1 January 2020, being the date that Gary Briggs was appointed as a Non-Executive Director.
3. Opening balance at 1 March 2020, being the date that Pat O’Sullivan was appointed as a Non-Executive Director.
4. Opening balance at 1 June 2020, being the date that Sharon Rothstein was appointed as a Non-Executive Director.
5. Ending balance at 8 October 2019, being the date that David Hancock ceased as a KMP and Director.
79
Table 19 Movements in shareholdings held under an employee share plan
Instrument
Opening
balance
1-Jul-19
Granted
Exercised
Lapsed /
cancelled
Balance
30-Jun-20
Exercisable
30-Jun-20
Non-Executive Directors
Elana Rubin
Dana Stalder
-
-
-
-
Clifford Rosenberg (part year)
Options1
900,000
Gary Briggs (part year)
Pat O’Sullivan (part year)
Sharon Rothstein (part year)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Executive KMP
Anthony Eisen
Nick Molnar
Luke Bortoli
Frerk-Malte Feller
(part year)
Options
1,500,000
125,000
Options
1,500,000
125,000
Options
1,350,000
-
(900,000)
Options
RSUs
-
-
80,704
50,240
-
-
(900,000)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,625,000
1,500,000
1,625,000
1,500,000
450,000
80,7042
50,2403
2,899,0874
-
-
-
-
David Hancock (part year)
Options
2,899,087
-
1. Clifford Rosenberg was granted options under legacy arrangements (in respect of pre-IPO advisory services and service on the Board of Afterpay at the time
of IPO), which were exchanged for APT options as part of the merger of the Afterpay and Touchcorp businesses. These relate to legacy one-off
arrangements and have now fully vested. Ending balance at 24 May 2020, being the date that Clifford Rosenberg ceased as a Non-Executive Director.
2. Ending balance is shown at 12 June 2020, being the date that Frerk-Malte Feller ceased as KMP. As described in section 5.5, the Board exercised its
discretion to pro-rate the LTI options to time served, and have determined to leave one-third on foot to be tested against the original performance hurdles
and vest (as applicable) in the ordinary course at 30 June 2022. The remaining LTI options will lapse on cessation of Malte’s employment in November 2020.
3. Ending balance is shown at 12 June 2020, being the date that Frerk-Malte Feller ceased as a KMP. As described in section 5.5, the first tranche of Malte’s
FY20 service-based RSUs (4,289 RSUs) and Buy-out Payment (12,459 RSUs) vested in the ordinary course on 1 July 2020. The remaining 8,576 FY20 service-
based RSUs will lapse on cessation of his employment in November 2020 and the remaining 24,916 Buy-out Payment RSUs will remain on foot to vest at the
original vesting dates of 1 July 2021 and 1 July 2022.
4. Ending balance is shown at 8 October 2019, being the date that David Hancock ceased as a KMP and Director. As noted in section 5.6.2, as a consequence of
the AUSTRAC audit in 2019, 200,000 options were withheld pending the outcomes of the final report of the external audit and AUSTRAC’s final
determination. The Board reserves discretion to lapse any of these options. These options will continue to be withheld until the outcome of the final
AUSTRAC determination is known.
80
8. Further Information
8.1 US ESOP
The Afterpay US, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (US ESOP) is a share option plan established in 2018 under
which the Group may issue options to eligible participants to acquire shares in Afterpay US, Inc., the Group’s
US based subsidiary. The Group has limited the total US ESOP pool to options over a maximum of 10% of
Afterpay US, Inc. fully diluted shares on issue and the Group has confirmed that there is no intention to
expand this pool. The Group has previously confirmed that the US ESOP is currently at or near the maximum
10% issuance.
The US ESOP was established to facilitate the attraction and retention of top-tier talent in the US, who have
been critical to delivering the Group’s US growth aspirations. While successful in achieving these aims, as
previously announced, the US ESOP is closed to new offers and new incentive awards made to US
employees are being provided by way of awards over APT equity to ensure a globally aligned and
consistent approach going forward and to provide greater transparency for our stakeholders. All existing
US ESOP grants will remain on foot to be tested (as appropriate) and vest in the ordinary course. No
Executive KMP participated in the US ESOP.
In order to provide eligible participants with a mechanism to liquidate their exercised shares, the exercised
shares in Afterpay US, Inc. may be exchanged for fully paid ordinary APT shares in specified circumstances
(subject to a cap). Further detail in respect of the US ESOP, including the exchange mechanism and
maximum dilution impact, is outlined in detail in Notes 5 and 20 of the Notes to the Financial Statements.
8.2 UK ESOP
The Group has previously confirmed that it would establish an equity incentive plan comprising equity
options in Afterpay’s UK based subsidiary ClearPay Finance Limited (Clearpay) (UK ESOP), in accordance
with the terms of the acquisition of Clearpay from ThinkSmart. As part of these terms, ThinkSmart agreed to
provide for an equity pool of 3.5% Clearpay shares on issue (out of its remaining 10% shareholding in Clearpay)
that could be used for the purposes of a UK ESOP in the form of options over the 3.5% of Clearpay shares. In
this way, the UK ESOP will not dilute Afterpay’s 90% shareholding in Clearpay.
The terms of the UK ESOP have now been finalised and the Board of Afterpay and Clearpay have adopted the
UK ESOP Rules. The Group is currently in the process of allocating the 3.5% pool noted above. As previously
disclosed, after the UK ESOP pool has been fully allocated to UK employees, new incentive awards made
to UK employees will be provided by way of awards over APT equity to ensure consistency with market
practice and transparency for our shareholders going forward. No Executive KMP will participate in the UK
ESOP.
As previously disclosed, on exercise of the UK ESOP options, eligible participants will be allocated shares in
Clearpay (exercised shares). In order to provide eligible participants with a mechanism to liquidate their
exercised shares, the exercised shares may be exchanged for fully paid ordinary APT shares or cash (at the
Group’s election) in specific circumstances (subject to a cap on the number of APT shares that may be
exchanged). Further detail in respect of the UK ESOP, including the exchange mechanism and maximum
dilution impact, is outlined in detail in Notes 5 and 20 of the Notes to the Financial Statements.
81
8.3 Movement of securities
The table below discloses the number of options or RSUs granted, vested or lapsed during FY20 for Executive KMP.
Table 20 Options or RSUs awarded, vested and lapsed during the reporting period for Executive KMP
Key Management
Personnel
Executive KMP
Financial
year
Instrument
Awarded
during the
reporting
period
Award date
Fair value at
award date1
$
Vesting
date2
Exercise
price
$
Expiry date
No. vested
during the
reporting
period
No. lapsed
during the
reporting
period
Anthony Eisen
2020
Options
125,000
13/11/2019
10.37
30/06/2022
37.31
01/07/2024
Nick Molnar
Luke Bortoli4
Frerk-Malte
Feller5 (part year)
David Hancock6
(part year)
2020
Options
125,000
13/11/2019
10.37
30/06/2022
37.31
01/07/2024
2020
Options
-
-
-
-
-
-
450,000
2020
Options
80,704
1/7/2019
13.63
30/06/2022
31.09
01/07/2024
RSUs
50,240
1/7/2019
24.40
01/09/2022
2020
Options
-
-
-
-
-
-
31/12/2022
-
1,492,555
-
-
-
-
Value
granted
during the
reporting
period
$
972,373
972,373
Value of
options
exercised
during the
reporting
period
$3
-
-
-
31,293,000
1,099,753
1,225,856
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1. The fair value of options are calculated using the Binomial Model.
2. Vesting date is the earliest date the vested options can be exercised.
3. Options vested and exercised is calculated as the difference between the share price at the date of exercise less the exercise price, and includes options vested in prior years that were exercised in FY20.
4. The second tranche of Luke Bortoli’s options vested on 1 June 2020 (i.e. 450,000 options), with the third and final tranche (i.e. 450,000 options) to be tested against vesting conditions on 1 June 2021.
5. Frerk-Malte Feller ceased as KMP on 12 June 2020.
6. David Hancock had 1,492,555 options tested for vesting conditions at 1 September 2019. As a consequence of the AUSTRAC audit in 2019, 200,000 options were withheld pending the outcomes of the final report of the external audit and AUSTRAC’s final
determination. The Board reserves discretion to lapse any of these options. These options will continue to be withheld until the outcome of the final AUSTRAC determination is known.
82
8.4 Other transactions and balances with Executive KMP
8.4.1 Loans to Executive KMP
No Executive KMP or their related parties held any loans with the Group during the Reporting Period.
8.4.2 Other Executive KMP transactions
The Group did not engage in any transactions with Executive KMP or their related parties during the
Reporting Period.
83
Financial Report
FY20 Financial Statements.Growth momentum continues in all markets with FY20 global underlying sales increasing 112% to $11.1b, with annualised run rate now over $15b.Contents.
86 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
87 Consolidated statement of financial position
88 Consolidated statement of changes in equity
89 Consolidated statement of cash flows
90 Notes to the financial statements
121 Group structure
90 Note 1-Basis of preparation
91 Group performance
91 Note 2-Segment information
94 Note 3-Expenses
95 Note 4-Taxation
99 Note 5-Earnings per share (EPS)
102 Assets and liabilities
102 Note 6-Cash and cash equivalents
103 Note 7-Receivables
106 Note 8-Other financial assets
106 Note 9-Property, plant and equipment
107 Note 10-Right-of-use assets
108 Note 11-Intangible assets
111 Capital structure, financing
& risk management
111 Note 12-Equity
112 Note 13-Interest bearing loans and borrowings
114 Note 14-Other financial liabilities
115 Note 15-Financial risk management
objectives and policies
121 Note 16-Business combinations
123 Note 17-Related party disclosure
124 Note 18-Information relating to Afterpay
Limited (formerly known as Afterpay
Touch Group Limited) (The Parent)
124 Note 19-Deed of cross guarantee
127 Employee remuneration
127 Note 20-Share-based payment plans
133 Note 21-Key management personnel
134 Items not recognised in
the financial statements
134 Note 22-Commitments and contingencies
135 Note 23-Events occurring after
the reporting period
137 Other information
137 Auditor’s remuneration
137 Other significant accounting policies
139 Directors’ declaration
140 Auditor’s Report
147 Additional Securities
Exchange Information
151 Corporate information
FY20 Financial Statements.Growth momentum continues in all markets with FY20 global underlying sales increasing 112% to $11.1b, with annualised run rate now over $15b.Consolidated statement of
comprehensive income
For the year ended 30 June 2020
Afterpay income
Pay Now revenue
Other income
Total income
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Depreciation and amortisation expenses1
Employment expenses
Share-based payment expenses
Receivables impairment expenses
Net loss on financial liabilities at fair value
Operating expenses
Operating loss
Share of loss of associate
Finance income
Finance costs1
Loss before tax
Income tax benefit/(expense)
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive loss
Note
2
2
2
3
3
7
14
3
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
433,815
200,868
16,493
17,095
68,843
46,149
519,151
264,112
(134,295)
(59,562)
384,856
204,550
(30,035)
(22,371)
(86,129)
(51,445)
(30,454)
(30,545)
(94,493)
(58,675)
(1,999)
-
(146,305)
(73,210)
(4,559)
(31,696)
(1,101)
1,408
-
563
(22,530)
(11,653)
(26,782)
(42,786)
4
3,925
(1,013)
(22,857)
(43,799)
Other comprehensive loss to be reclassified to profit or loss in
subsequent periods (net of tax)
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations
Total comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax
Loss attributable to
Owners of Afterpay Limited
Non-controlling interests
Earnings per share for loss attributable to the ordinary equity
holders of the company
5
Basic loss per share
Diluted loss per share
(17,904)
(776)
(40,761)
(44,575)
(19,780)
(42,861)
(3,077)
(938)
$
(0.08)
(0.08)
$
(0.18)
(0.18)
1. The Group adopted AASB 16 Leases using the modified retrospective method and has not restated comparatives for 2019.
The 2019 comparatives are not comparable to 2020 for recognition and measurement, as disclosed further in Note 25.
The above Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
86
Consolidated statement of
financial position
As at 30 June 2020
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables
Other financial assets
Other assets
Total Current Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property, plant and equipment
Right-of-use assets1
Intangible assets
Deferred tax assets
Investment in associate
Other financial assets
Other assets
Total Non-Current Assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Employee benefit provision
Contract liability
Interest bearing loans and borrowings1
Other financial liabilities
Income tax payable
Total Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
Employee benefit provision
Other provisions
Other financial liabilities
Interest bearing loans and borrowings1
Total Non-Current Liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Issued capital
Accumulated losses
Reserves
Equity attributable to the owners of Afterpay Limited
Non-controlling interest
TOTAL EQUITY
Note
2020
$’000
2019
$’000
6
7
8
9
10
11
4
8
13
14
4
14
13
12
606,041
781,895
10,660
6,695
231,456
452,699
3,003
9,130
1,405,291
696,288
5,127
6,999
106,589
78,291
5,166
893
170
4,213
-
89,072
27,280
-
3,035
580
203,235
124,180
1,608,526
820,468
180,730
109,981
5,279
224
4,278
1,883
1,158
2,585
100
597
1,772
5,370
193,552
120,405
513
305
3,038
464,767
468,623
662,175
946,351
317
565
1,039
49,626
51,547
171,952
648,516
975,317
(90,355)
58,711
674,769
(70,575)
41,365
943,673
645,559
2,678
2,957
946,351
648,516
1. The Group adopted AASB 16 Leases using the modified retrospective method and has not restated comparatives for 2019.
The 2019 comparatives are not comparable to 2020 for recognition and measurement, as disclosed further in Note 25.
The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
87
Consolidated statement of
changes in equity
For the year ended 30 June 2020
At 1 July 2019
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive loss
Total comprehensive loss for the year
Transactions
Issue of share capital
Share issue expenses (net of tax)
Share options exercised (net of tax)
Share-based payments
Accumulated
Losses
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Reserve
Other
Reserves
$’000
$’000
$’000
Issued
Capital
$’000
Non-
Controlling
Interest
$’000
Total
$’000
Total
$’000
674,769
(70,575)
(821)
42,186
645,559
2,957
648,516
-
-
-
(19,780)
-
-
(17,904)
(19,780)
(17,904)
233,012
(1,782)
69,318
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(19,780)
(3,077)
(22,857)
(17,904)
-
(17,904)
(37,684)
(3,077)
(40,761)
233,012
(1,782)
-
-
233,012
(1,782)
6,637
75,955
957
76,912
28,613
28,613
1,841
30,454
At 30 June 2020
975,317
(90,355)
(18,725)
77,436
943,673
2,678
946,351
For the year ended 30 June 2019
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Issued
Capital
Accumulated
Losses
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Reserve
Other
Reserves
Non-
Controlling
Interest
$’000
Total
$’000
Total
$’000
At 1 July 2018
192,628
(22,195)
(45)
13,167
183,555
-
183,555
Initial application of AASB 9 and AASB 15
-
(5,519)
-
-
(5,519)
-
(5,519)
Restated balance at 1 July 2018
192,628
(27,714)
(45)
13,167
178,036
-
178,036
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive loss
Total comprehensive loss for the year
Transactions
-
-
-
(42,861)
-
-
(776)
-
-
(42,861)
(938)
(43,799)
(776)
-
(776)
(42,861)
(776)
-
(43,637)
(938)
(44,575)
Issue of share capital
459,269
Share issue expenses (net of tax)
(10,050)
Issue of ordinary shares, as
consideration for a business
combination, net of transaction costs
and tax
17,826
Non-controlling interest on acquisition
of subsidiary
-
Share options exercised (net of tax)
15,096
Share-based payments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
459,269
-
459,269
(10,050)
17,826
-
-
(10,050)
17,826
-
(1,039)
(1,039)
1,981
942
-
-
(3,678)
11,418
372
11,790
33,736
33,736
1,542
35,278
At 30 June 2019
674,769
(70,575)
(821)
42,186
645,559
2,957
648,516
The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
88
Consolidated statement of
cash flows
For the year ended 30 June 2020
Cash flows from operating activities
Receipts from customers (inclusive of GST)
Payments to employees
Note
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
9,954,963
4,823,012
(80,895)
(39,827)
Payments to merchants and suppliers (inclusive of GST)
(10,103,761)
(4,916,304)
Income taxes paid
(4,260)
(9,073)
Net cash outflow from operating activities
6
(233,953)
(142,192)
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received
Decrease/(Increase) in term deposits
Payments for development of intangible assets
Purchase of intangibles
Purchase of plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of business
Contributions to associates
Net cash outflow from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings
Repayment of borrowings
Decrease in restricted cash
Proceeds from exercise of share options
Proceeds from issue of shares, net
Capital raising expenses
Payment of lease liabilities1
Interest and bank fees paid1
1,476
560
686
(866)
(40,754)
(21,055)
(1,452)
(485)
(3,389)
(2,070)
-
7,500
(5,088)
-
(48,647)
(16,290)
1,386,247
414,988
(970,826)
(526,493)
494
21,711
30,550
13,631
233,012
459,269
(5,208)
(11,424)
(5,307)
-
(19,514)
(14,549)
Net cash inflow from financing activities
649,448
357,133
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Foreign exchange on cash balance
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
366,848
198,651
7,737
246
231,456
32,559
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
6
606,041
231,456
1. The Group adopted AASB 16 Leases using the modified retrospective method and has not restated comparatives for 2019.
The 2019 comparatives are not comparable to 2020 for recognition and measurement, as disclosed further in Note 25.
The above Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
89
Notes to the financial
statements
1.
Basis of preparation
Afterpay Limited (formerly known as Afterpay Touch Group Limited) is a for-profit
company incorporated on 30 March 2017 and domiciled in Australia. The securities of
Afterpay Limited (the Company) are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX).
Afterpay Limited’s ASX code is ‘APT’. The activities of Afterpay Limited and its
subsidiaries (together referred to as ‘the Group’) are described in the Directors’ Report.
The Group’s principal place of business is 406 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria,
Australia.
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Afterpay Limited as at and for the year ended
30 June 2020 were authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors
on 27 August 2020.
These financial statements:
• are general-purpose financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative pronouncements of the
Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB), and the Corporations Act 2001;
• comply with Australian Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board;
• have been prepared on a going concern basis using historical cost basis, except for the
revaluation of certain financial instruments that are measured at fair value;
• are presented in Australian dollars. All values are rounded to the nearest thousand
($’000), except when otherwise indicated, in accordance with the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission (ASIC) Corporations Instrument 2016/191;
• where necessary, comparative information has been restated to conform to changes in
presentation in the current year; and
• apply significant accounting policies consistently to all periods presented, unless
otherwise stated.
Significant judgements, estimates and assumptions
Management has identified a number of accounting policies for which significant
judgements, estimates and assumptions are made. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions and conditions and may materially affect
financial results or the financial position reported in future periods.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic remains uncertain. To the extent necessary, the
Group has used judgements, estimates and assumptions that reflect this uncertainty.
Further details of significant judgements, estimates and assumptions may be found in
the following notes to the financial statements:
• Note 4 Taxation;
• Note 7 Receivables;
• Note 11 Intangible assets; and
• Note 20 Share-based payment plans.
90
Group performance
2.
Segment information
The Group’s reportable operating segments have been identified based on the financial
information currently provided to the Chief Operating Decision Makers (CODMs). The
CODMs, who are responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the
operating segments, have been identified as the Chief Executive Officer and Managing
Director, Global Chief Revenue Officer and Executive Director and Global Chief Financial
Officer. The business operates under the following segments:
• Afterpay ANZ: Comprises the Afterpay Australia and New Zealand platforms;
• Afterpay US: Comprises the Afterpay United States platform;
• Clearpay: Comprises the Clearpay United Kingdom platform;
• Pay Now: Comprises Mobility, Health and e-Services; and
• Corporate: Comprises Group expenses that are not directly attributable or allocated to
the Afterpay, Clearpay or Pay Now segments.
Non-IFRS financial measures are reviewed by the CODMs for decision making purposes.
EBITDA (excluding significant items) has been disclosed as it is the most IFRS-like
measure reported to the CODMs.
The number of operating segments has increased from the 30 June 2019 financial
statements as a reflection of the growth of the Clearpay business (previously included
within Afterpay Other) and changes to reporting reviewed by the CODMs (Afterpay New
Zealand was previously included within Afterpay Other but is now managed within
Afterpay ANZ). The 2019 comparatives have been restated in line with the current year
presentation.
The Group continuously reviews its global operating model, financial reporting systems
and relevant financial measures reviewed by the CODMs for decision making purposes
in light of its expansion into markets outside of Australia. The Group’s reportable
operating segments may change in the future in line with this expansion and review.
Services provided between operating segments are on an arm’s-length basis and are
eliminated on consolidation.
91
Year ended 30 June 2020
Total segment income1
Segment results
Segment EBITDA
(excl. significant items)2,3
Foreign currency gains
Share-based payment expenses
Net loss on financial liabilities at fair value
Share of loss of associate
One-off items
EBITDA
Depreciation and amortisation
Net finance cost
Loss before income tax
Income tax benefit
Loss for the year
Year ended 30 June 20194
Total segment income1
Segment results
Segment EBITDA
(excl. significant items)2,3
Foreign currency gains
Share-based payment expenses
One-off items
EBITDA
Depreciation and amortisation
Net finance cost
Loss before income tax
Income tax expense
Loss for the year
Afterpay
ANZ
Afterpay
US
Clearpay
Pay Now
Corporate
Total
Segments
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
313,687
162,724
26,247
16,493
-
519,151
142,177
(47,000)
(12,922)
6,532
(44,387)
44,400
19,948
(30,454)
(1,999)
(1,101)
(6,419)
24,375
(30,035)
(21,122)
(26,782)
3,925
(22,857)
Afterpay
ANZ
Afterpay
US
Clearpay
Pay Now
Corporate
Total
Segments
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
207,870
39,002
145
17,095
-
264,112
87,860
(24,554)
(4,402)
4,930
(38,119)
25,715
2,961
(30,545)
(7,456)
(9,325)
(22,371)
(11,090)
(42,786)
(1,013)
(43,799)
1. Total segment income includes Afterpay income, Pay Now revenue and Other income, which relates to Afterpay’s late fees.
2. Segment EBITDA (excluding significant items) excludes the impact of share-based payment expenses, foreign currency
gains, net loss on financial liabilities at fair value, share of loss of associate and one-off items. No government grants or other
COVID-19-related benefits have been recognised in the year (2019: nil).
3. EBITDA in the year ended 30 June 2019 has not been restated for the adoption of AASB 16 Leases. EBITDA in the year ended
30 June 2020 includes a $5.6 million benefit from the adoption of AASB 16. The Group adopted AASB 16 using the modified
retrospective method and has not restated comparatives for the prior year, as per the specific transitional provisions.
4. The prior year comparative has been restated to be comparable with the current year segment classifications.
92
Significant accounting policies
Afterpay income
Afterpay income is derived from the difference between the consumer’s
underlying order value processed on the Afterpay platform and the amount paid
to the merchant by Afterpay, referred to as Merchant fees. Afterpay generally
pays merchants the net amount of the order value less the Merchant fees, which
consists of fixed and variable rates, and Afterpay then assumes all non-
repayment risk from the consumer. There are no interest or fees charged by
Afterpay, other than late fees described below.
Merchant fees are recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income using the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) method, accreting the Merchant
fees over the average period from initial payment to the merchant by Afterpay to
the final instalment paid by the consumer to Afterpay. The Group defers Afterpay
income over the average time it takes for the collection of the receivable to
occur, with the current average weighted duration to recoup end-consumer
payments being approximately 25 days or less (2019: 30 days or less). This
deferred income is recorded as a reduction in the consumer receivables balance
in Note 7.
Pay Now Revenue
The Pay Now business primarily generates its revenue via transaction fees for
delivery of completed transactions and integration fees to connect new, or grant
existing customers access to additional service models. The transaction revenue
is generated from facilitating the sales of electronic products and services where
the Group receives a fee (either fixed or a percentage of the transaction volume)
for every successful transaction. Revenue is recognised on completion of a
successful transaction or when products are delivered and activated by end-
customers. The Group is generally remunerated for the transactional services on
a weekly and monthly basis.
Revenue from integration services is considered a distinct service, and is
recognised by reference to the stage of completion of a contract or contracts in
progress at balance date, as required by AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with
Customers. Stage of completion is measured by reference to labour hours of
each contract, which aligns with the transfer of the services. Where there is a
final customer acceptance condition in the contract, revenue is recognised only
upon customer acceptance.
Contract liabilities are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position in respect of any unsatisfied performance obligations. The Group does
not have any contract assets due to the invoicing and payment terms generally
being in advance of the service provision. The Group does not have contracts
where the period between the transfer of the promised goods or services to the
customer and payment by the customer exceeds 1 year. Therefore, the Group
does not adjust any of the transaction prices for the time value of money.
Payments from customers are generally collected within 30 days of the provision
of services.
Other income – Late fees
Late fee charges are currently used by Afterpay as an incentive to encourage
end-customers to pay their outstanding balances as and when they fall due. Late
fees are recognised as Other income when late fees become payable and are
expected to be recovered.
93
3.
Expenses
Depreciation and amortisation expenses
Depreciation
Amortisation
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
(7,607)
(1,978)
(22,428)
(20,393)
Total depreciation and amortisation expenses
(30,035)
(22,371)
Employment expenses
Wages and salaries
Employee on-costs
Total employment expenses
Operating expenses
(74,113)
(42,429)
(12,016)
(9,016)
(86,129)
(51,445)
Debt recovery costs, including chargebacks
(17,135)
(9,721)
Consulting and contractor costs
Marketing expenses
Communication and technology
Operating lease expenses1
Foreign currency gains
Net gain on sale of business2
AUSTRAC related costs
General and administrative expenses
Total operating expenses
(32,896)
(17,177)
(70,520)
(22,877)
(18,536)
(8,202)
(1,159)
19,948
-
(4,122)
2,961
1,271
(3,723)
(1,079)
(22,284)
(14,264)
(146,305)
(73,210)
1.
Includes expenses relating to short-term leases and leases of low value assets. The 2019 comparatives relate to operating
lease expenses recognised under AASB 117 Leases. AASB 117 was replaced with AASB 16 Leases from 1 July 2019. These
expenses are not comparable year on year as disclosed further in Note 25.
2. Represents the net gain on sale of the European e-Services business, which was completed on 1 November 2018. The
European e-Services business did not represent a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations.
Significant accounting policies
Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are
measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the
entity operates (the functional currency). The Consolidated Financial Statements
are presented in Australian dollars ($), which is the Company’s functional and
presentation currency. Exchange differences arising on translation of the foreign
controlled entities are recognised in other comprehensive income and
accumulated in the Foreign currency translation reserve within equity. The
cumulative amount is reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income upon disposal of any net investment in foreign
controlled entities.
94
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using
the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and
losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions, and from the
translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies
at year end exchange rates, are generally recognised in the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income. They are deferred in equity if they relate to
qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges or are
attributable to part of the net investment in a foreign operation.
Foreign exchange gains and losses are presented in the Consolidated Statement
of Comprehensive Income on a net basis within operating expenses.
4.
Taxation
Income tax expense
The major components of Income tax expense:
Current income tax charge
Current Income tax expense
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
(21,945)
(15,263)
Adjustments in respect of current income tax of previous years
734
55
Deferred income tax
Relating to origination/reversal of temporary differences
25,619
14,082
Adjustment in relation to deferred income tax of previous years
Income tax benefit/(expense) as reported in the income
statement
(483)
3,925
113
(1,013)
Statement of changes in equity
Current income tax related to share-based payments
2020
$'000
(46,420)
2019
$'000
-
Deferred income tax related to opening retained earnings
-
(2,362)
Deferred income tax related to capital raising costs
(764)
(4,293)
Total income tax related to items credited directly to equity
(47,184)
(6,655)
95
Numerical reconciliation between aggregate Income tax expense recognised in
the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and Income tax expense
calculated per the statutory income tax rate
A reconciliation between tax expense and the product of accounting loss before income
tax multiplied by the Group's applicable income tax rate is as follows:
Accounting loss before tax
At the Group's statutory rate of 30% (2019: 30%)
Expenditure not allowed for income tax purposes
Foreign tax rate differential
Amount under provided in prior years
Non-recoverable foreign taxes
Utilisation of tax losses not previously recognised
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
(26,782)
(42,786)
8,035
(2,199)
(1,339)
252
(824)
-
12,836
(12,150)
(1,911)
168
-
44
Income tax benefit/(expense)
3,925
(1,013)
Deferred income tax
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
Deferred income tax at 30 June relates to the following:
Deferred tax liabilities
Capitalisation of development expenditure
Prepayments
Customer contracts
Unrealised foreign exchange
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred receivables
Other
Gross deferred tax liabilities
Deferred tax assets
Capitalisation of development expenditure
Employee benefits
Other provisions
Capital raising costs
Research and development tax offsets
Property, plant and equipment
Provision for expected credit losses
Deferred receivables
Losses
Other
Gross deferred tax assets
Net deferred tax assets
-
112
1,530
1,331
-
5,772
2,200
10,945
708
5,768
580
3,314
1,000
640
10,028
2,583
47
262
1,805
758
159
1,449
796
5,276
-
3,754
1,429
3,790
-
-
8,328
2,305
63,434
11,774
1,181
1,176
89,236
32,556
78,291
27,280
96
Significant accounting judgements, estimates and
assumptions
Timing of recognition of deferred tax balances
The value of the net deferred tax recognised requires judgement regarding the
assessment of probable future profits. Differences between the future profits of
the Group (and the timing of these profits) and the tax positions in the financial
report could necessitate future adjustments to deferred tax balances recorded.
Significant accounting policies
Income tax
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is
recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income except for
those items recognised directly in equity.
Current tax in respect of the taxable income for the year is measured at the
amount expected to be recovered from, or paid to, the taxation authorities. The
tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or
substantively enacted by the reporting date.
Deferred tax is recognised using the balance sheet method in which temporary
differences are calculated based on the difference between the tax bases of
assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected
to apply in the year when the asset is realised, or the liability is settled, based on
tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the
reporting date. Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary
differences and unused tax credits and tax losses only to the extent that it is
probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the assets can
be utilised.
Unrecognised deferred tax assets are reassessed at each reporting date and are
recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit
will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally
enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities
and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and
the same taxation authority.
Tax consolidation legislation
Afterpay Limited and its wholly-owned Australian controlled subsidiaries formed
a tax consolidated group effective from 15 August 2017. Afterpay Limited and the
members of the tax consolidated group recognise their own current tax and
deferred tax assets and liabilities arising from temporary differences using the
‘standalone taxpayer approach’ by reference to the carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities in the separate financial statements of each entity and the tax
values applying under tax consolidation. In addition to its current and deferred
tax balances, Afterpay Limited, as the head entity, has assumed the current tax
liabilities and any deferred tax assets arising from unused tax credits or losses of
the members in the tax consolidated group.
97
Nature of tax funding arrangements and tax sharing arrangements
Entities in the tax consolidated group entered into a tax funding agreement with
the head entity. The arrangements require payments to/(from) the head entity
equal to the current tax liability/(asset) assumed by the head entity and any
deferred taxes relating to unused tax losses or unused tax credits transferred to
the head entity, resulting in the head entity recognising an inter-entity
receivable/(payable) equal in amount to the tax liability/(asset) assumed.
The inter-entity receivables/(payables) are at call. Contributions to fund the
current tax liabilities are payable as per the tax funding agreement. The head
entity, in conjunction with other members of the tax consolidated group, has
entered into a tax sharing agreement. The tax sharing agreement provides for
the determination of the allocation of income tax liabilities between the entities
should the head entity default on its tax payment obligations.
No amounts have been recognised in the financial statements in respect of this
agreement as payment of any amounts under the tax sharing agreement is
considered remote.
Other taxes
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and
services tax (GST) except:
• when the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not
recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised
as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as
applicable; and
•
receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is
included as part of receivables or payables in the Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position.
Cash flows are included in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on a gross
basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing
activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority, is
classified as operating cash flows. Commitments and contingencies are
disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation
authority.
98
5.
Earnings per share (EPS)
The following table outlines the loss and share data used in the basic and diluted EPS
calculations:
Loss attributable to owners of Afterpay Limited for basic
earnings
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
(19,780)
(42,861)
No.'000
No.'000
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic EPS
259,147
231,919
Adjustment for calculation of diluted EPS1
Weighted average number of ordinary shares adjusted for the
effect of dilution
6,839
11,827
265,986
243,746
1. Includes the effect of dilution from share options, loan shares and rights (e.g. restricted stock units and performance rights).
Basic EPS amounts are calculated by dividing the loss for the period attributable to
ordinary equity holders of Afterpay Limited by the weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted EPS amounts are calculated by dividing the loss attributable to ordinary equity
holders of Afterpay Limited by the sum of the weighted average number of ordinary
shares outstanding during the period and the weighted average number of ordinary
shares that would be issued if all securities which have the potential to cause dilution
are converted into ordinary shares.
The adjustment for the calculation of diluted EPS in the table above does not take into
account any options or similar conversion or exchange rights issued under the two
convertible notes issued to Matrix Partners X L.P and Weston & Co X LLC (Matrix
Convertible Notes), options granted under the Afterpay US, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive
Plan (US ESOP), the put and call option to acquire the remaining shares in ClearPay
Finance Limited (Clearpay Put and Call Option) or the equity incentive plan comprising
options over equity in ClearPay Finance Limited (UK ESOP).
The potential number of APT shares that could be issued under these arrangements
were excluded from the adjustment for the calculation of diluted EPS in the table above
given the number of APT shares to be issued will only be determined on exercise and
conversion or exchange (as applicable) which will occur at a future date and based on
future valuations which are unable to be reliably estimated today. In all arrangements,
the number of APT shares which may be issued on conversion or exchange is subject to
maximum levels.
Matrix Convertible Notes
On 19 January 2018, Afterpay US, Inc. issued two convertible notes to Matrix Partners X
L.P and Weston & Co X LLC (Matrix Convertible Notes). The Matrix Convertible Notes
may be converted into APT shares in certain circumstances between 5 and 7 years from
the date of issue of the notes (being 19 January 2018), with conversion at the
noteholder’s election. Conversion of the Matrix Convertible Notes may also be
accelerated, at the Group’s election, in the event of a change in control of APT.
The number of APT shares which may be issued on conversion is determined by a
conversion value calculated based on 10% of the future value of Afterpay US, Inc. in
excess of US$50 million (to be determined by an independent valuation at the time of
conversion) divided by the volume weighted average price (‘VWAP’) of APT shares over
the 30 trading days up to (but excluding) the date on which an exercise notice is
delivered.
99
The maximum number of shares in APT that may be issued on conversion of the Matrix
Convertible Notes is capped at 21,777,661 being 10% of the number of APT shares on
issue at the date the Matrix Convertible Notes were issued. This now equates to less
than 8% of current APT shares on issue due to subsequent share issues since the Matrix
Convertible Notes were issued. The Group considers it unlikely that the maximum
number of APT shares would be issued on conversion because for this to happen it
would mean that the value of APT (excluding Afterpay US, Inc.) is negligible or very low
in comparison to the assessed value of Afterpay US, Inc.
US ESOP
The Afterpay US, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (US ESOP) is a share option plan
established in 2018 under which the Group may issue options to eligible participants to
acquire shares in Afterpay US, Inc., the Group’s US based subsidiary. On vesting and
exercise of US ESOP options, eligible participants are allocated shares in Afterpay US,
Inc. (exercised shares). In order to provide eligible participants with a mechanism to
liquidate their exercised shares, the exercised shares may be exchanged for fully paid
ordinary APT shares in specific circumstances.
The number of APT shares which are issued in exchange for exercised shares in Afterpay
US, Inc. will be based on the future value of Afterpay US, Inc. shares (based on the same
valuation as referred to in the Matrix Convertible Notes, or based on an independent
valuation in the case of exchange occurring at the discretion of the APT Board, as
applicable).
The maximum number of APT shares that can be issued under the US ESOP in
exchange for exercised shares cannot exceed 21,777,661 APT shares, being 10% of the
number of APT shares on issue at the date the Matrix Convertible Notes were issued.
This now equates to less than 8% of current APT shares on issue due to subsequent
share issues since the Matrix Convertible Notes were issued. For the reasons set out
above in respect of the Matrix Convertible Notes, the Group considers it unlikely that the
maximum number of APT shares would be issued upon exchange.
Further detail in respect of the US ESOP, including the exchange mechanism, is
outlined in Note 20.
Clearpay Put and Call Option
On 23 August 2018, the Group acquired 90% of the issued shares in ClearPay Finance
Limited (Clearpay) (an unlisted entity based in the United Kingdom, 100% owned by
ThinkSmart Limited) (ThinkSmart) for total consideration of 1.0 million APT shares. The
Group has a call option to acquire the remaining Clearpay shares held by ThinkSmart,
which is exercisable any time after 5 years from the completion of the acquisition of 90%
of Clearpay (being 23 August 2018). If the Group does not exercise its call option within
that period, then ThinkSmart has a put option to sell all the remaining shares it holds in
Clearpay to the Group, exercisable any time after 5.5 years from the abovementioned
date of completion.
APT has the right to exercise the call option earlier than 5 years from the
abovementioned date of completion in the event of a change of control of either APT or
ThinkSmart. APT may also exercise the call option early on certain events of default or
insolvency events in relation to ThinkSmart, in which case the exercise price will be
based on Clearpay's net tangible assets instead of the valuation principles described
below.
100
Consideration for the remaining Clearpay shares held by ThinkSmart at the time of
exercise of the put or call option will be determined by agreement, or failing agreement,
by an independent expert valuation of Clearpay shares. Consideration may be paid by
the Group in cash or APT shares, at APT's election. The number of APT shares that may
be issued and exchanged as consideration for the remaining Clearpay shares will be
based on the value of the remaining Clearpay shares divided by the volume weighted
average price (VWAP) of APT shares over the 5 trading days up to the date of option
exercise. The maximum number of APT shares that may be issued or exchanged for the
remaining Clearpay shares held by ThinkSmart as a result of its exercise of the put
option is capped at 5% of APT shares on issue at the time of exchange.
UK ESOP
The Group had previously confirmed that it would establish an equity incentive plan
comprising options over equity in Afterpay’s UK based subsidiary ClearPay Finance
Limited (Clearpay) (UK ESOP), in accordance with the terms of the acquisition of
Clearpay from ThinkSmart. As part of these terms, ThinkSmart agreed to provide for an
equity pool of 3.5% Clearpay shares on issue (out of its remaining 10% shareholding in
Clearpay) that could be used for the purposes of a UK ESOP in the form of options over
the 3.5% of Clearpay shares. In this way, the UK ESOP will not dilute Afterpay’s 90%
shareholding in Clearpay. The terms of the UK ESOP have now been finalised and the
Board of Afterpay and Clearpay adopted the UK ESOP Rules on 24 June 2020. The Group
is currently in the process of allocating the 3.5% pool noted above.
On exercise of UK ESOP options, eligible participants will be allocated shares in Clearpay
(exercised shares). In order to provide eligible participants with a mechanism to
liquidate their exercised shares, it is intended that exercised shares may be exchanged
for fully paid ordinary APT shares or cash (at the Group’s election) in specified
circumstances. It is intended that exercised shares in Clearpay will be exchanged into
APT shares or cash at the same valuation of Clearpay shares as the Clearpay Put and Call
Option (as applicable) outlined above.
The maximum number of APT shares that can be issued in exchange for exercised
Clearpay shares under the UK ESOP is subject to a cap of 3% of APT shares on issue at
the date of adoption of the UK ESOP Rules, being 267,967,466 shares on 24 June 2020.
The Group considers it unlikely that the maximum number of APT shares of 8% across
the Clearpay Put and Call Option (with a cap of 5% as outlined above) and the UK ESOP
(with a cap of 3% as outlined in this section) would be issued because for this to happen
it would necessarily mean that the value of APT (excluding Clearpay) is negligible or very
low in comparison to the assessed value of Clearpay at the time of exchange.
Further detail in respect of the UK ESOP, including the exchange mechanism, is
outlined in Note 20.
101
Assets and liabilities
6. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash at bank
Short-term deposits
Total cash and cash equivalents
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
512,984
121,365
93,057
110,091
606,041
231,456
Reconciliation from the net loss before tax to the net cash outflow from
operations
Loss before tax
Adjustments for:
Depreciation and amortisation expenses
Share-based payment expenses
Net loss on financial liabilities at fair value
Share of loss of associate
Finance costs
Finance income
2020
$’000
2019
$’000
(26,782)
(42,786)
30,035
30,454
1,999
1,101
22,530
(1,408)
22,371
30,545
-
-
11,653
(563)
Gain on sale of European e-Services business
Foreign currency gains
-
(1,271)
(19,948)
(2,535)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in total receivables
Impact of accounting standard changes on
receivables
(Increase)/Decrease in other financial assets and
other assets
Increase in trade and other payables, contract
liabilities and provisions
Tax paid
(329,196)
(213,631)
-
(7,847)
(11,981)
2,861
73,503
68,084
(4,260)
(9,073)
Net cash outflow from operating activities
(233,953)
(142,192)
Significant accounting policies
Cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
comprises cash at bank and in hand, cash in transit and cash in escrow for daily
receipts and settlements that is settled within one to seven days. Cash and cash
equivalents also comprise short-term deposits with an original maturity of three
months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which
are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. For the purposes of the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents consists of
cash and cash equivalents as defined above.
102
7.
Receivables
Consumer receivables - face value
Consumer receivables - recognised over time1
Consumer receivables
2020
$’000
2019
$’000
816,812
482,123
(16,678)
(9,647)
800,134
472,476
Trade and other receivables
15,712
7,983
Total receivables before provision for expected credit losses
815,846
480,459
Provision for expected credit losses
Opening balance
Provided in the year
Debts written off/collected
Total provision for expected credit losses
(27,760)
(18,054)
(94,493)
(58,675)
88,302
48,969
(33,951)
(27,760)
Total receivables
781,895
452,699
1. Recognised over time represents the consumer transactions completed by period end but earned over the collection period of
the consumer receivables. Refer to Note 2 for further details.
Significant accounting judgements, estimates and
assumptions
Judgement is applied in measuring the Provision for expected credit losses and
determining whether the risk of default has increased significantly since initial
recognition of the Consumer receivable. The Group considers both quantitative
and qualitative information, including historical loss experience, internal expert
risk assessment and data examination, and forward-looking information and
analysis. Historical balances, as well as the proportion of those balances that have
defaulted over time, are used as a basis to determine the probability of default.
The Group also considers forward looking adjustments, including macro-
economic seasonality trends that are not captured within the base expected
credit loss (ECL) calculations. The inclusion of forward-looking information
increases the degree of judgement required to assess effects on the Group’s
ECLs. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic remains uncertain and represents a
material downside risk to the economy. However, the Group’s collections
subsequent to year end have not deteriorated relative to past experience. While
the methodologies applied to the ECL calculations remained unchanged from
those applied in 2019, the Group has incorporated judgements, estimates and
assumptions specific to the impact of COVID-19, where relevant, in the
measurement of ECL.
The assumptions and methodologies applied are reviewed regularly.
103
Significant accounting policies
Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables are primarily amounts due from merchants as a
result of transactions with consumers. A receivable represents the Group’s right
to an amount of consideration that is unconditional (i.e. only the passage of time
is required before payment of the consideration is due). The Group’s business
model is to hold the receivables with the objective to collect the contractual cash
flows. Trade and other receivables are measured at amortised cost and generally
have 1 - 30 day payment terms. There are no contract assets at 30 June 2020
(2019: nil).
Collectability of trade and other receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis.
Individual debts that are known to be non-collectable are written off when
identified. The Group has established a provision matrix that is based on the
Group’s historical credit experience adjusted for forward-looking factors specific
to the debtors and the economic environment.
The Group applies a simplified approach in calculating the ECLs for trade
receivables based on lifetime expected credit losses.
Consumer receivables
Consumer receivables are amounts due from consumers for outstanding
instalment payments on orders processed on the Afterpay platform. The Group’s
business model is to hold the receivables with the objective to collect the
contractual cash flows. Consumer receivables are measured at amortised cost
using the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) method. They are generally due within 14 –
56 days.
Provision for expected credit losses (ECLs)
The Group applies the general provision approach permitted under AASB 9
Financial Instruments to account for ECLs on Consumer receivables measured
at amortised cost. ECLs are based on the difference between the contractual
cash flows due in accordance with the Afterpay terms and all the cash flows that
the Group expects to receive. Due to the short-term nature of the Consumer
receivables, the ECLs are based on the lifetime ECL.
The Group uses ageing of Consumer receivables as the basis for ECL
measurement given the short duration of consumer payment terms (maximum
56 days). For consumers on hardship cases, payment terms may be extended
which is determined on a per case basis.
At each reporting date, the Group assesses impairment risk on initial recognition
of the Consumer receivable and movements in the ageing of outstanding
Consumer receivables to estimate the ECL.
The Group also applies the general provision approach permitted under AASB 9
Financial Instruments to account for ECLs on other receivables measured at
amortised cost. Due to the short-term nature of the other receivables (due on
invoice) and the Group’s historical credit experience, the other receivables are
written off once overdue and there is no reasonable expectation of recovery.
104
Under this impairment approach, AASB 9 requires the Group to classify
Consumer receivables into three stages, which measure the ECL based on credit
migration between the stages. The Group has defined these stages as follows:
Ageing
Measurement basis
Stage
Stage 1
Stage 2
Not yet due
1 to 61 days
past due
While the Consumer receivables are not yet due, an ECL has
been determined based on a probability of a default event
occurring over the life of the Consumer receivables.
Although there is usually no objective evidence of impairment,
when a consumer has not paid by the due date, it is an
indication that credit risk has increased. As a result, the loss
allowance for that Consumer receivable is measured at an
amount equal to the lifetime ECL for increased credit risk.
Lifetime ECL is the expected credit losses that result from all
possible default events over the expected life of the Consumer
receivables.
When the Consumer receivable is greater than 61 days past due,
there is considered to be objective evidence of impairment.
Ageing greater than 61 days is considered to have an adverse
impact on the estimated future cash flows of the Consumer
receivable.
Stage 3
Greater than 61
days past due
Receivables are written off when the Group has no reasonable expectation of
recovery. Prior period receivable balances are either fully written off or collected
during the current financial year. Any subsequent recoveries following write off
are credited to Receivables impairment expenses within the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income in the period in which they were
recovered.
20201
$'000
$'000
Consumer receivables - face value2
783,679
25,007
$'000
8,126
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Total
$'000
816,812
Provision for expected credit losses
(11,473)
(14,910)
(7,568)
(33,951)
Net consumer receivables
772,206
10,097
558
782,861
20191
Consumer receivables - face value2
453,266
21,880
6,977
482,123
Provision for expected credit losses
(6,434)
(14,440)
(6,886)
(27,760)
Net consumer receivables
446,832
7,440
91
454,363
1. The simplified approach prescribed in AASB 9 is used for Trade receivables, therefore the related provision for
expected credit losses is excluded from the ECL staging table for both 2020 and 2019. While the general approach
is used for other receivables, staging has not been provided as all balances that are at risk of non-recovery have
been written off. The provision for expected credit losses related to Trade and other receivables was nil (2019: nil).
2. ECL for Consumer receivables is calculated on the Consumer receivables – face value.
As the Group’s receivables are short-term in nature, the staging transfer
disclosures have not been provided.
105
8. Other financial assets
Restricted cash
Short-term deposits
Other
2020
$'000
1,536
3,448
6,569
2019
$'000
2,030
4,008
-
Total other financial assets
11,553
6,038
Total Current
Total Non-Current
Total other financial assets
10,660
893
3,003
3,035
11,553
6,038
Restricted cash are cash assets held with AA-/BBB+ banks as collateral for daily cash
settlements with merchants and payments to funding providers. Refer to Note 13 for
further information on the Group’s receivables warehouse facilities. Short-term deposits
are cash assets held with AA-/BBB+ banks as collateral for bank guarantees (see Note
22) and as part of the Group’s normal business operations.
9.
Property, plant and equipment
The net book value of property, plant and equipment of $5.1 million (2019: $4.2 million)
primarily includes computer equipment, furniture fittings and leasehold improvements.
During the period, the Group purchased property, plant and equipment of $3.4 million
(2019: $2.4 million), reclassified $0.3 million to Right-of-use assets (see Note 25), disposed
$nil million (2019: $0.2 million) and recognised depreciation of $2.2 million (2019: $2.0
million) in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Significant accounting policies
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated
depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.
Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful life
of the specific assets of 3 - 5 years.
106
10. Right-of-use assets
Cost
At 1 July (Note 25)
Additions
Modifications
Terminations
At 30 June
Accumulated depreciation
At 1 July
Depreciation
Terminations
At 30 June
Net book value
At 30 June 2020
Commercial property leases
8,614
4,480
(749)
(1,255)
11,090
2020
$'000
8,614
4,480
(749)
(1,255)
11,090
-
-
(5,338)
(5,338)
1,247
1,247
(4,091)
(4,091)
6,999
6,999
Significant accounting policies
The determination of whether an arrangement is or contains a lease is based on
the substance of the arrangement and requires an assessment of whether the
fulfilment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of the specific asset and
whether the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset.
Leases are recognised as a right-of-use asset and a corresponding liability in the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at the date at which the leased
asset is available for use by the Group.
Right-of-use assets are measured at cost comprising the following:
•
the amount of the initial measurement of lease liability (see Note 13);
• any lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any
lease incentives received; and
• any initial direct costs.
Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line basis over the shorter of the asset’s
useful life and the lease term. Rental contracts are typically made for fixed
periods between 12 months and 4 years but may include extension options.
107
11.
Intangible assets
Cost
At 1 July 2018
Core
Technology
Customer
Contracts
Other
Intangibles
Goodwill
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
Total
$'000
53,803
15,352
140
23,575
92,870
Additions - internally generated
21,538
Other additions
Acquisition of a subsidiary
-
-
-
-
-
-
689
-
-
21,538
689
3,985
16,232
20,217
Disposals
(6,473)
(1,248)
-
-
(7,721)
At 30 June 2019
68,868
14,104
4,814
39,807
127,593
Additions - internally generated
38,884
Other additions
Disposals
-
-
-
-
-
228
834
-
-
-
-
39,112
834
-
At 30 June 2020
107,752
14,104
5,876
39,807
167,539
Accumulated Amortisation
At 1 July 2018
Amortisation
Disposals
(15,473)
(4,882)
(20)
(13,369)
(4,605)
(2,419)
1,692
555
-
-
-
-
(20,375)
(20,393)
2,247
At 30 June 2019
(27,150)
(8,932)
(2,439)
-
(38,521)
Amortisation
Disposals
(19,029)
(2,591)
(809)
-
-
-
At 30 June 2020
(46,179)
(11,523)
(3,248)
-
-
-
(22,429)
-
(60,950)
Net book value
At 30 June 2019
At 30 June 2020
41,718
5,172
2,375
39,807
89,072
61,573
2,581
2,628
39,807
106,589
Significant accounting judgements, estimates and
assumptions
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. The impairment assessment
requires management judgement with respect to an estimate of the recoverable
amount of the cash generating unit (CGU) using a discounted cash flow
methodology. This calculation uses cash flow projections based on operating
budgets and strategic business plans, after which a terminal value is applied,
based on management’s view of the expected long-term growth profile of the
business. The determination of cash flows over the life of an asset requires
management judgement in assessing the future number of merchant
acquisitions, customer usage, potential price changes as well as any changes to
the costs of the product and of other operating costs incurred by the Group. The
implied pre-tax discount rate is calculated with reference to long-term
government bond rates, external analyst views and the Group’s pre-tax cost of
debt and equity.
108
Significant accounting policies
Goodwill
On acquisition, goodwill is initially measured as the excess of the purchase
consideration of the acquired business over the fair value of the identifiable net
assets.
Goodwill is allocated to each of the cash generating units expected to benefit
from the business combination. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life and is not
amortised but is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually.
Intangible assets (excluding goodwill)
Intangible assets, including Core technology, Customer contracts and Other
intangible assets are measured at cost on initial recognition. Intangible assets
acquired as a result of a business combination are measured at fair value as at
the date of acquisition. Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried
at cost less accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses.
Internally generated intangibles, excluding capitalised development costs, are
not capitalised and the related expenditure is reflected in the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income in the period in which the expenditure is
incurred.
Core technology
Core technology includes internally generated software being developed as
research and development projects. Research costs are expensed as incurred.
Development expenditures on an individual project are recognised as an
intangible asset when the Group can demonstrate:
•
the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that the asset
will be available for use or sale;
its intention to complete, and its ability to use or sell the asset;
•
• how the asset will generate future economic benefits;
•
•
the ability to use the intangible asset generated.
the ability to reliably measure the expenditure during development; and
Following initial recognition of the development expenditure as an asset, the
asset is carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and any accumulated
impairment losses. Amortisation of the asset begins when development is
complete, and the asset is available for use. It is amortised over the period of
expected future benefit.
A summary of the policies applied to the Group’s intangible assets (excluding
goodwill) is as follows:
Core technology
Customer contracts
Other intangibles
Internally Generated/
Acquired
Internally generated
and acquired
Acquired
Acquired
Useful Lives
Finite: 3 - 5 years
Finite: 3 - 5 years
Finite: 2 - 7 years
Amortisation Method Used
Straight-line
Straight-line
Straight-line
Impairment
Amortisation method is reviewed at every reporting period. Reviewed
annually for indicators of impairment.
109
Impairment tests for intangible assets, including goodwill
The Group initially considers the relationship between its market capitalisation
and its book value, among other factors specific to each cash generating unit
(CGU), when reviewing for indicators of impairment.
As the Group continues to acquire operations and reorganise the way operations
are managed, reporting structures may change giving rise to a reassessment of
CGUs and/or the allocation of goodwill to those CGUs.
The Group performed a detailed impairment review of goodwill and concluded
that there was no impairment for the financial year ended 30 June 2020. At 30
June 2020, the market capitalisation of the Group was significantly greater than
the Group’s equity book value, further supporting no impairment of goodwill or
other assets of the CGUs.
For the purpose of the impairment test, goodwill is allocated to CGUs. The
carrying amount of each CGU is compared to its recoverable amount. In
assessing for impairment, the Group’s assets are grouped at the lowest level of
separately identifiable cash inflows, which are largely independent of the cash
flows from other assets or CGUs. Assets apart from goodwill that have previously
recognised impairment in the past are reviewed for possible reversal at the end
of each reporting period. A summary of the goodwill allocation and impairment
testing assumptions are presented below:
Afterpay AU
Clearpay
Pay Now
TOTAL
Goodwill allocation
$'000
21,220
$'000
16,232
Risk-weighted pre-tax discount rate
17.6%
34.8%
Risk adjusted growth rate beyond 5
years
2%
N/A
$'000
2,355
13.6%
(1%)
Revenue multiple beyond 2 years
N/A
1.4x
N/A
$'000
39,807
N/A
N/A
N/A
The Group has performed a detailed sensitivity analysis as part of its impairment
testing to ensure that the results of its testing are reasonable. The discount rate
for Pay Now would need to increase by approximately 20 basis points, or the
terminal value growth rate would need to decrease by approximately 30 basis
points, before the recoverable amount would equal its carrying value.
Afterpay AU and Pay Now
The recoverable amounts have been determined based on a value-in-use
calculation using five-year post-tax cash flow projections. The post-tax cashflow
projections are based on the Group’s expectations of growth, excluding the
impact of possible future acquisitions, business improvement and restructuring.
Clearpay
The recoverable amount has been determined based on a fair value less costs of
disposal calculation using a number of inputs including cash flow projections
based on two years of financial forecasts approved by senior management. The
valuation is measured using inputs that are not based on observable market
data. Therefore, they are considered to be level 3 within the fair value hierarchy as
per AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement. Cash flows are projected over a two-year
period to reflect the current economic conditions and the growth profile of the
business, which commenced trading in May 2019. Cash flows beyond the two-
year period are extrapolated using a revenue multiple.
110
Issued and fully paid
At 1 July 2018
Shares issued
Share options and loan shares exercised
Acquisition of a subsidiary
Capital raising costs (net of tax)
At 30 June 2019
Shares issued
Share options and loan shares exercised
Capital raising costs (net of tax)
At 30 June 20201
2020
$’000
2019
$’000
975,317
674,769
No.'000
216,204
$'000
192,628
22,131
459,269
12,157
15,096
1,000
17,826
-
(10,050)
251,492
674,769
8,453
7,680
-
233,012
69,318
(1,782)
267,625
975,317
1. The total number of ordinary shares on issue excludes 0.4m loan shares.
For the financial year ended 30 June 2020, Afterpay Limited raised capital totalling
$233.0 million. This comprised:
$200.0 million Institutional Placement completed on 27 November 2019; and
$33.0 million Share Purchase Plan (SPP) completed on 10 February 2020.
Subsequent to 30 June 2020 the Group completed a $786.2 million capital raising, which
comprised a $650.0 million Institutional Placement and a $136.2 million Share Purchase
Plan (SPP). See Note 23.
For the financial year ended 30 June 2019, Afterpay Limited raised capital totalling
$459.3 million. This comprised:
$117.0 million Institutional Placement and $25.0 million SPP, completed by September
2018; and $317.3 million Institutional Placement completed in June 2019.
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to
the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax,
from the proceeds raised via the issue of new shares.
Information relating to employee options, including details of options issued,
exercised and lapsed during the financial year and options outstanding at the
end of the reporting period, is disclosed in Note 20.
111
13.
Interest bearing loans and borrowings
Secured interest bearing borrowings
Senior unsecured notes
Matrix convertible notes
Total interest bearing borrowings
Lease liabilities
2020
$'000
461,444
-
156
2019
$'000
-
49,737
144
461,600
49,881
7,445
342
Total interest bearing loans and borrowings
469,045
50,223
Total Current
Total Non-Current
4,278
597
464,767
49,626
Total interest bearing loans and borrowings
469,045
50,223
Secured interest bearing borrowings
The Group’s Australian receivables warehouse funding facility totalling $500.0 million
(2019: $500.0 million) is provided by National Australia Bank (NAB) ($300.0 million) and
Citi ($200.0 million) and is secured against Afterpay AU receivables, which are
transferred into the facility. As at 30 June 2020, the carrying value of Afterpay AU
consumer receivables is $368.0 million (2019: $339.7 million) and the facilities have $155.0
million drawn (2019: undrawn). For the year ended 30 June 2020, drawings under these
facilities incurred a weighted average interest rate of 2.2% p.a. (2019: 3.6%). Both facilities
mature in December 2022.
The Group’s US receivables warehouse funding facilities totalling US$400 million ($582.8
million) are provided by Citi (US$200 million) and Goldman Sachs (US$200 million). The
facilities are secured against Afterpay US receivables, which are transferred into the
facility. As at 30 June 2020, the carrying value of Afterpay US consumer receivables is
US$226.4 million ($329.9 million) (2019: $84.0 million). As at 30 June 2020 the Citi facility
has US$4.0 million ($5.9 million) drawn (2019: undrawn), and the Goldman Sachs facility
has US$193.0 million ($281.2 million) drawn. For the year ended 30 June 2020, drawings
under these facilities incurred a weighted average interest rate of 3.2% p.a. (2019: nil). The
Citi facility matures in May 2022 and the Goldman Sachs facility matures in December
2021.
The Group increased its receivables warehouse facility with Bank of New Zealand (BNZ)
by NZ$30 million to NZ$50.0 million ($46.7 million) in June 2020. The facility is secured
against Afterpay NZ receivables, which are transferred into the facility. As at 30 June
2020, the carrying value of Afterpay NZ consumer receivables is NZ$37.9 million ($35.4
million), and the facility has NZ$25.0 million ($23.4 million) drawn (2019: undrawn). For
the year ended 30 June 2020, drawings under this facility incurred a weighted average
interest rate of 1.65% p.a. (2019: nil). The facility matures in March 2022.
The Group has capitalised $4.9 million of borrowing costs at 30 June 2020 (2019: $4.6
million). The effective interest rates used to determine the amount of borrowing costs
eligible for capitalisation is specific to the individual facilities.
Borrowings are classified as non-current when there is no obligation or expectation that
the liability will be settled within the next 12 months at the reporting date.
112
Senior unsecured notes
Senior unsecured notes with a carrying value of $50.0 million were issued to institutional
and professional investors on 27 April 2018 for a fixed rate of 7.25% over a four-year term
(interest payable semi-annually). The notes were redeemed on 27 April 2020.
Matrix convertible notes
On 19 January 2018, Afterpay US, Inc. issued two convertible notes to Matrix Partners X
L.P and Weston & Co X LLC (Matrix Convertible Notes). The Matrix Convertible Notes
have a carrying value of US$0.1 million, carry a fixed interest rate of 6.0% for a 7-year
maximum term and may be converted into APT shares in certain circumstances
(subject to a cap) between 5 and 7 years from the date of issue of the notes (being 19
January 2018), with conversion at the noteholder’s election. Further detail in respect of
the Matrix Convertible Notes, including the conversion mechanism and maximum
dilution impact, is outlined in Note 5.
Lease liabilities
The Group leases various offices across Australia, New Zealand, the United States and
the United Kingdom. Rental contracts are typically made for fixed periods of more than
12 months to 4 years but may have extension options. Lease terms are negotiated on an
individual basis and contain a wide range of different terms and conditions.
Prior to 1 July 2019, leases of property, plant and equipment were classified as operating
leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the
lessor) were charged to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
See Note 25 for impact of the adoption of AASB 16 Leases on 1 July 2019.
From 1 July 2019, at the inception of a contract, the Group assesses whether a contract is,
or contains, a lease.
Liabilities arising from a lease are initially measured on a present value basis. Lease
liabilities include the net present value of the following lease payments:
•
fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments), less any lease incentives
receivable;
• variable lease payment that are based on an index or a rate;
• amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees;
•
•
the lease component of contracts that include non-lease components and other
services, within the lease liability;
the extension option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option; and
• payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee
exercising that option.
The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease. If that
rate cannot be determined, the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is used, being the
rate that the lessee would have to pay to borrow the funds necessary to obtain an asset
of similar value in a similar economic environment with similar terms and conditions.
Refer to Note 15(d) for maturity of future lease payments.
Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance cost. The finance cost
is charged to profit or loss over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic
rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period.
Payments associated with short-term leases, leases of low-value assets and variable
leases are recognised as operating expenses as incurred. Short-term leases are leases
with a lease term of less than 12 months. Low-value assets comprise point of sale
equipment (terminals) and small items of office furniture.
113
14. Other financial liabilities
Exercised options not yet settled
Clearpay put option
Other
Total other financial liabilities
Total Current
Total Non-Current
Total other financial liabilities
Clearpay put option
Note
20
2020
$'000
1,672
2019
$'000
1,772
3,038
1,039
211
-
4,921
2,811
1,883
3,038
4,921
1,772
1,039
2,811
As outlined in Note 5, the Group has a call option to acquire the remaining Clearpay
Finance Limited (Clearpay) shares held by ThinkSmart Limited (ThinkSmart), which is
exercisable any time after 5 years from the date of completion of the acquisition of 90%
of Clearpay (being 23 August 2018). If the Group does not exercise its call option within
that period, then ThinkSmart has a put option to sell the remaining shares it holds in
Clearpay to the Group, exercisable any time after 5.5 years from the abovementioned
date of completion.
A discounted cash flow model has been used to obtain the fair value of the put option
held by ThinkSmart at 30 June 2020. Significant inputs to the valuation are consistent
with those used in the Clearpay goodwill impairment assessment included in Note 11.
The measurement basis of the put option is fair value through profit and loss and is
classified as a level 3 financial liability in accordance with AASB 13 Fair Value
Measurement. Gains or losses are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income.
Further detail in respect of the Clearpay put option is outlined in Note 5.
Reconciliation of liabilities arising from financing activities
Cash
movements
Non-cash movements
Opening
balance
Cash flows2 Amortisation
Other1
2020
Secured interest bearing
borrowings
$'000
$'000
-
449,638
$'000
5,567
Senior unsecured notes
49,737
(50,000)
263
Matrix convertible notes
Lease liabilities
Total interest bearing
loans and borrowings
144
342
-
(4,867)
-
-
50,223
394,771
5,830
18,221
$'000
6,239
-
12
11,970
Fair value
loss
Closing
balance
$'000
$'000
-
-
-
-
-
461,444
-
156
7,445
469,045
Other financial liabilities
2,811
939
-
(828)
1,999
4,921
Total liabilities arising
from financing activities
53,034
395,710
5,830
17,393
1,999
473,966
Includes foreign exchange movement and impact of adoption of AASB 16 Leases. Refer to Note 25 for further details.
1.
2. Movements include the net cash inflows (e.g. drawdowns) and outflows (e.g. repayments and interest payments)
114
Cash
movements
Non-cash movements
Opening
balance
Cash flows2 Amortisation
2019
$'000
$'000
$'000
Secured interest bearing
borrowings
111,593
(111,593)
-
Other1
$'000
-
Senior unsecured notes
49,491
294
(48)
-
-
(94)
128
393
161,605
(111,687)
294
-
-
16
43
11
Matrix convertible notes
Lease liabilities
Total interest bearing
loans and borrowings
Clearpay
put option
Closing
balance
$'000
$'000
-
-
-
-
-
-
49,737
144
342
50,223
Other financial liabilities
-
2,164
-
Total liabilities arising
from financing activities
161,605
(109,523)
294
(392)
(381)
1,039
2,811
1,039
53,034
Includes foreign exchange movements and other non-cash movements.
1.
2. Movements include the net cash inflows (e.g. drawdowns) and outflows (e.g. repayments and interest payments)
15. Financial risk management objectives and policies
The Group’s principal financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents,
receivables, other financial assets, trade and other payables, other financial liabilities and
interest bearing loans and borrowings.
The Group manages its exposure to key financial risks, including interest rate, foreign
currency, credit and liquidity risk in accordance with the Group's financial risk
management policy; the objective of which is to support the delivery of the Group's
financial targets, while protecting future financial security.
These mitigations include monitoring levels of exposure to interest rate and foreign
exchange risk and assessments of market forecasts for interest rate and foreign
exchange, and by depositing funds with several different banking institutions. Ageing
analysis and monitoring of specific credit allowances are undertaken to manage credit
risk. Liquidity risk is monitored through the development of future rolling cash flow
forecasts.
115
(a)
Interest rate risk
The Group’s exposure to market interest rates relate primarily to the Group’s Cash and
cash equivalents, Other financial assets (Restricted cash and Short-term deposits) and
Secured interest bearing borrowings. At balance date, the Group had the following mix
of financial assets and liabilities exposed to variable interest rate risk:
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Other financial assets
Total financial assets
Financial Liabilities
Secured interest bearing borrowings
Total financial liabilities
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
606,041
231,456
4,984
6,038
611,025
237,494
(461,444)
(461,444)
-
-
Net Exposure
149,581
237,494
The following sensitivity analysis is based on the interest rate risk exposures in existence
at the reporting date.
At 30 June 2020, if interest rates had moved, as illustrated in the table below, with all
other variables held constant, loss for the year and equity would have been affected as
follows:
Judgements of reasonably possible movements:
-0.25% (25 basis points)
+1.00% (100 basis points)
Loss for the year
(Higher)/Lower
Equity
(Higher)/Lower
2020
$'000
(262)
1,047
2019
$'000
(416)
2020
$'000
262
2019
$'000
416
1,662
(1,047)
(1,662)
The Matrix Convertible Notes are on a fixed interest rate basis. The Group’s receivables
warehouse funding facilities are on a variable rate (30 day) basis. This aligns closely to
the weighted average life of the Afterpay consumer receivables they finance.
The financial liabilities as disclosed in Note 14 comprise the put option held by
ThinkSmart and early exercised unvested options, which are not exposed to interest rate
risks.
There are no other financial liabilities subject to interest rate risk as at 30 June 2020. The
Group has not hedged any interest rate risk during the year or at 30 June 2020.
116
(b) Foreign currency risk
Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates may impact the Group’s results. The Group’s
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position can be affected by movements in the US
Dollar, New Zealand Dollar, and Great British Pound.
The Group has not hedged any foreign currency risk during the year or at 30 June 2020.
At 30 June 2020, the Group has the following exposure to foreign currency that is not
designated in cash flow hedges:
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
NZD
USD
GBP
Other
Receivables and other financial assets
NZD
USD
GBP
Financial Liabilities
Trade and other payables
NZD
USD
GBP
Other
Financial liabilities
NZD
USD
GBP
Net exposure
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
15,582
193,062
33,383
-
4,173
31,379
4,512
2
34,616
17,846
331,594
84,597
52,275
3,296
660,512
145,805
3,541
94,320
20,866
235
23,214
284,547
3,038
2,950
37,559
3,683
-
-
1,916
1,039
429,761
47,147
230,751
98,658
The following sensitivity analysis is based on the foreign currency risk exposures in
existence at the reporting date.
117
At 30 June 2020, if exchange rates had moved, as illustrated in the table below, with all
other variables held constant, loss for the year and equity would have been affected as
follows:
Judgements of reasonably possible movements:
AUD/NZD +10%
AUD/NZD -5%
AUD/USD +10%
AUD/USD -5%
AUD/GBP+10%
AUD/GBP -5%
AUD/Other +10%
AUD/Other -5%
(c) Credit risk
Loss for the year
(Higher)/Lower
Equity
(Higher)/Lower
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
(1,492)
(1,213)
2020
$'000
1,492
864
703
(864)
2019
$'000
1,213
(703)
(9,277)
(4,868)
9,277
4,868
5,371
2,818
(5,371)
(2,818)
(3,930)
(196)
3,930
2,275
114
(2,275)
15
(9)
-
-
(15)
9
196
(114)
-
-
Credit risk arises from the financial assets of the Group. The Group’s exposure to credit
risk arises from potential default of the Consumer receivables, with a maximum
exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments.
The Group utilises its proprietary fraud engine and risk decisioning rules to mitigate
credit risk for its Consumer receivables. The Group regularly reviews the adequacy of the
provision for doubtful debts to ensure that it is sufficient to mitigate credit risk exposure
in terms of financial reporting. The provision for doubtful debts represents
management’s best estimate at reporting date of the expected credit losses based on
their experienced judgement. Further details have been provided in Note 7.
Credit risk also arises from cash held with bank and financial institutions, and from the
investment of financial assets when they are available with designated counterparties.
(d) Liquidity risk
The Group’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and
flexibility through the use of credit facilities. The Group mitigates funding and liquidity
risks by ensuring it has (1) sufficient funds on hand to meet its working capital and
investment objectives; (2) is focused on improving operational cash flow; and (3) has
adequate flexibility in financing facilities to balance the growth objectives with short-
term and long-term liquidity requirements.
The Group’s receivables warehouse funding facilities all have maturity dates greater
than 12 months after balance date as per below.
118
Maturity analysis of financial assets and liabilities
The table below reflects all contractually fixed payments and receivables for settlement,
repayments and interest resulting from recognised financial assets and liabilities.
Year ended 30 June 2020
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
< 1 year
1-2 years
2-3 years
> 3 years
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
606,041
Receivables
Other financial assets
781,895
10,660
Total financial assets
1,398,596
-
-
893
893
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables
180,730
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,499
316,947
157,705
Secured interest bearing
borrowings
Matrix convertible notes
Financial liabilities
Lease liabilities
-
1,883
4,517
-
-
-
-
207
207
3,038
4,921
1,774
1,003
573
7,867
Total
$'000
606,041
781,895
11,553
1,399,489
180,730
481,151
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total financial liabilities
193,629
318,721
158,708
3,818
674,876
Net maturity
1,204,967
(317,828)
(158,708)
(3,818)
724,613
Year ended 30 June 2019
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
< 1 year
1-2 years
2-3 years
> 3 years
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
231,456
Receivables
Other financial assets
Total financial assets
Financial liabilities
452,699
3,003
687,158
Trade and other payables
109,981
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,035
3,035
-
Senior unsecured notes
3,625
3,625
53,625
-
-
-
-
-
-
Matrix convertible notes
Financial liabilities
Lease liabilities
-
1,772
94
-
-
94
-
-
258
199
1,039
-
Total
$'000
231,456
452,699
6,038
690,193
109,981
60,875
199
2,811
446
Total financial liabilities
115,472
3,719
53,883
1,238
174,312
Net maturity
571,686
(3,719)
(50,848)
(1,238)
515,881
The carrying value of financial assets and liabilities approximates their fair value.
119
Capital management
The Group reviews its capital management position on a regular basis to ensure that it
maintains adequate funding for near-term and medium-term obligations.
In particular, the Group periodically reviews its capital management strategy to ensure
that funding initiatives are in place to support medium-term growth objectives and, as
detailed in Note 12, the Group raised $233.0 million in the year (2019: $459.3 million) for
the purpose of funding medium-term underlying sales and other working capital. As
detailed in Note 23, a further $786.2 million was raised subsequent to 30 June 2020.
As detailed in Note 13, the Group has receivable warehouse funding facilities. The
receivables warehouse funding facilities contain portfolio parameters. The Group
satisfied the portfolio parameters during the financial year ended and at 30 June 2020.
The Group’s cash and net debt position as at the end of the reporting period is as
follows:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
606,041
231,456
1,536
2,030
Interest bearing loans and borrowings
(469,045)
(50,223)
Net cash/(debt) position
138,534
183,263
Fair value measurement
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial
statements are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based
on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
• Level 1 — Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities;
• Level 2 — Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the
fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable; and
• Level 3 — Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the
fair value measurement is unobservable.
The following table summarises the levels of the fair value hierarchy for financial
liabilities held at fair value:
Year ended 30 June 2020
$'000
$'000
Clearpay put option (Note 14)
Total financial liabilities
-
-
-
-
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$'000
3,038
Total
$'000
3,038
3,038
3,038
Year ended 30 June 2019
$'000
$'000
Clearpay put option (Note 14)
Total financial liabilities
-
-
-
-
$'000
1,039
1,039
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
$'000
1,039
1,039
If the discount rate increased/decreased by 250 basis points, the valuation of the liability
would decrease/increase by $0.3 million. If the revenue multiple increased/decreased by
0.1x, the valuation of the liability would increase/decrease by $0.7 million.
120
Group structure
16. Business combinations
On 23 August 2018 (the completion date), the Group acquired 90% of the issued shares
in ClearPay Finance Limited (Clearpay) (an unlisted entity based in the United Kingdom,
100% owned by ThinkSmart Limited) (ThinkSmart) for total consideration of 1.0 million
APT shares.
The acquisition of Clearpay met the recognition criteria for consolidation, with the
transaction treated as though the Group had effectively acquired 100% of Clearpay at
the completion date. The financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2019 therefore
included 100% of the results of Clearpay for the ten-month period from the completion
date.
Clearpay contributed income of $0.14 million and incurred $8.1 million of losses to the
Group for the period from 23 August 2018 to 30 June 2019 (the majority being the one-
off costs to launch the business). If the acquisition had taken place on 1 July 2018, total
income would have been approximately $0.2 million and the loss for the period would
have been approximately $8.6 million.
The Group acquired Clearpay to accelerate and de-risk the Group’s launch of the
Afterpay product into the UK market, which is consistent with its NZ and US expansion
strategies to partner with local market participants. Goodwill is the difference between
the fair value of the net assets of ClearPay Finance Limited and the deemed purchase
consideration. Details of the purchase consideration and the fair values of the
identifiable assets and liabilities of Clearpay as at the date of acquisition were as follows:
Fair value recognised
on acquisition
Assets
Current assets
Intangible assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Deferred tax liabilities
Total identifiable net assets at fair value
Less: non-controlling interest
Add: Goodwill arising on acquisition
Purchase consideration transferred
$'000
355
3,985
4,340
52
713
3,575
(1,981)
16,232
17,826
Acquisition-related costs of approximately $0.9 million were included in operating
expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended
30 June 2019.
For the non-controlling interests in Clearpay retained by ThinkSmart, the Group elected
to recognise the non-controlling interests at its proportionate fair value.
121
Significant accounting policies
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost
of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred,
which is measured at acquisition date fair value, and the amount of any non-
controlling interests in the acquiree. For each business combination, the Group
elects whether to measure the non-controlling interests in the acquiree at fair
value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets.
Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and included in
administrative expenses.
When the Group acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities
assumed for appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the
contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the
acquisition date.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost (being the excess of the aggregate of the
consideration transferred and the amount recognised for non-controlling
interests and any previous interest held over the net identifiable assets acquired
and liabilities assumed).
If the fair value of the net assets acquired is in excess of the aggregate
consideration transferred, the Group re-assesses whether it has correctly
identified all of the assets acquired and all of the liabilities assumed and reviews
the procedures used to measure the amounts to be recognised at the
acquisition date. If the reassessment still results in an excess of the fair value of
the net assets acquired over the aggregate consideration transferred, the gain is
recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
122
17. Related party disclosure
The ultimate controlling entity is Afterpay Limited, otherwise described as the parent
company.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the financial statements of Afterpay
Limited and its subsidiaries. These are listed in the following table:
Name
Afterpay Australia Pty Ltd (formerly known as
Afterpay Pty Ltd) 1
Afterpay Holdings Pty Ltd 1
Afterpay Warehouse Trust
Afterpay Touch Group Employee Share Plan
Trust
Country of
incorporation
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
% Equity interest
2020
100%
100%
100%
100%
2019
100%
100%
100%
100%
Afterpay Touch Group No.2 Pty Ltd 1
Australia
100%
100%
Afterpay US, Inc. 4
United States
Afterpay Receivables Warehouse-C LLC 2
United States
Afterpay Receivables Warehouse-GS LLC 2,5
United States
Afterpay US Services, LLC 2
Afterpay NZ Limited
Afterpay NZ Warehouse Trust 5
ClearPay Finance Limited
ClearPay Finance HCB Limited 3
Afterpay Canada Limited 5
Touchcorp Limited 1
Afterpay China Holdings Pty Ltd 5
Afterpay Information Technology Service
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd5
Touch Holdings Pty Ltd 1
Touch Networks Australia Pty Ltd 1
Touch Australia Pty Ltd 1
Touch Networks Pty Ltd 1
Touchcorp Singapore Pte Ltd
United States
New Zealand
New Zealand
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Canada
Bermuda
Australia
China
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Singapore
Touch Networks Payments (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd 6
Malaysia
96%
96%
96%
96%
100%
100%
90%
90%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-
99%
99%
-
99%
100%
-
90%
90%
-
100%
-
-
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
1. Refer to Note 19 for further information on the parties subject to a deed of cross guarantee.
2. Wholly owned subsidiaries of Afterpay US, Inc.
3. Wholly owned subsidiary of Clearpay Finance Limited.
4. The Group’s equity interest in Afterpay US, Inc is approximately 96% due to vested and exercised options under the US ESOP.
Refer to Note 20 for further information.
5. New legal entity established during the year.
6. Legal entity wound-up during the year.
123
The following table provides the total amount of transactions that have been entered
into with related parties for the year ended 30 June 2020. There were no similar
transactions or balances for the year ended 30 June 2019.
Statement of Comprehensive Income
Statement of Financial Position
Sales to
related parties
Purchases
from related
parties
Share of loss of
associate
Amounts
owed by
related parties
Amounts
owed to
related parties
Contributions
made to
associate
Year ended 30 June 2020
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
Associate
AP Ventures Limited 1
(‘APV’)
1,180
-
(1,101)
-
-
6,587
1. Afterpay owns 43.9% of the common shares of APV (2019: 4.6%), is entitled to 24.2% of the voting rights (2019: 4.6%), has no
representation on the Board and has no involvement in the management of APV through contractual arrangements.
18.
Information relating to Afterpay Limited (formerly known
as Afterpay Touch Group Limited) (The Parent)
Current Assets
Non-Current Assets
Total Assets
Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Net Assets
Issued Capital
Reserves
Accumulated Losses
Total Equity
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
57,486
12,085
971,893
720,087
1,029,379
732,172
6,754
-
6,754
12,008
49,140
61,148
1,022,625
671,024
957,932
641,949
82,409
(17,716)
45,193
(16,118)
1,022,625
671,024
Loss of the Parent entity
(1,598)
(14,943)
Total comprehensive loss of the Parent entity
(1,598)
(14,943)
19. Deed of cross guarantee
The subsidiaries identified in Note 17 ‘Related Party Disclosure’ are parties to a deed of
cross guarantee under which each guarantees the debts of the others. By entering into
the Deed, the wholly-owned entities have been relieved of the requirement to prepare a
financial report and Directors’ Report under ASIC Corporations (Wholly-owned
Companies) Instruments 2016/785. These subsidiaries and Afterpay Limited together
referred to as the ‘Closed Group’, originally entered into the Deed on 29 November 2017.
The effect of the Deed is that each party to it has guaranteed to pay any deficiency in
the event of the winding up of any of the entities in the Closed Group.
124
The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position of the Closed Group is as follows:
As at 30 June
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables
Other financial assets
Other assets
Total Current Assets
Non-Current Assets
Investments in associates
Investments in subsidiaries
Property, plant and equipment
Rights-of-use assets
Intangible assets
Deferred tax asset
Other financial assets
Other assets
Related party receivables
Total Non-Current Assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Provisions
Contract liabilities
Interest bearing loans and borrowings
Income tax payable
Total Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
Provisions
Interest bearing loans and borrowings
Related party payables
Financial liabilities
Total Non-Current Liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Contributed equity
Retained earnings/(losses)
Reserves
TOTAL EQUITY
2020
$'000
2019
$'000
185,154
369,518
3,015
5,314
171,842
347,660
857
5,106
563,001
525,465
5,166
570,527
4,164
5,318
73,280
43,144
893
170
-
702,662
1,265,663
-
17,826
3,627
-
67,151
15,446
2,450
580
180,798
287,878
813,343
61,700
70,447
5,131
226
3,159
917
2,511
100
597
5,122
71,133
78,777
513
3,167
121,474
3,038
128,192
199,325
1,066,338
975,317
17,266
73,755
1,066,338
882
49,480
-
1,039
51,401
130,178
683,165
674,769
(29,759)
38,155
683,165
125
The Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income of the subsidiaries that are
members of the Closed Group is as follows:
For the year ended 30 June
Profit before income tax
Income tax expense
2020
$'000
65,991
2019
$'000
1,855
(19,805)
(11,969)
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year, net of
46,186
(10,114)
tax
126
Employee remuneration
20. Share-based payment plans
Overview of plans
(a) Purpose of incentive plans
Employees of the Group may receive remuneration in the form of share-based
payments under the Group’s equity incentive plans, whereby employees render services
as consideration for equity instruments (i.e. equity-settled transactions).
The purpose of these plans is to:
• Attract, retain and motivate world-class talent from the global technology talent pool to
deliver on the Group’s growth aspirations;
• Align the interests of employees with the Group’s shareholders; and
• Encourage long-term decision making and drive sustainable performance in the
interests of the Group’s shareholders, customers and other stakeholders.
(b) Plans operated during the year
During the year ended 30 June 2020, the Group operated share-based payment plans
across the following instruments:
• Awards over APT equity comprising of options and restricted stock units (RSUs) under
the Group’s new Afterpay Equity Incentive Plan (approved at the 2019 AGM on 13
November 2019). The new plan reflects best practice and was developed and adopted to
operationalise the new FY20 Remuneration Framework outlined in the Remuneration
Report;
• Awards over APT equity comprising of options, loan shares and performance rights
under the Group’s legacy remuneration plan, the Afterpay Employee Incentive Plan
(which was adopted prior to listing in July 2017); and
• Equity in Afterpay US, Inc. (a subsidiary of Afterpay Limited) under the Afterpay US, Inc.
2018 Equity Incentive Plan (US ESOP).
The Group had previously confirmed that it would establish an equity incentive plan
comprising options over equity in Afterpay’s UK based subsidiary ClearPay Finance
Limited (Clearpay) (UK ESOP), in accordance with the terms of the acquisition of
Clearpay from ThinkSmart. As part of these terms (and as set out in the “UK ESOP”
section of this Note below), ThinkSmart agreed to provide for an equity pool of 3.5% of
Clearpay shares on issue (out of its remaining 10% shareholding) that could be used for
the purposes of a UK ESOP in the form of options over the 3.5% of Clearpay shares. The
terms of the UK ESOP have now been finalised and the Board of Afterpay and Clearpay
adopted the UK ESOP Rules on 24 June 2020. No options had been granted under the
UK ESOP as at 30 June 2020; the Group is currently in the process of allocating the 3.5%
pool noted above.
(c) Approach to subsidiary plans going forward
The Group is committed to providing greater transparency in respect of its employee
incentive plans for its stakeholders. To this end, the Group has committed to providing
new awards to employees globally in the form of awards over APT equity. This creates
alignment of future equity incentive awards in all Afterpay’s markets and provides a
path towards greater visibility of the impact of incentive plans on APT issued share
capital.
127
In particular, the US ESOP is now closed to new offers and new incentive awards made
to US employees are being made in the form of APT equity. In respect of the UK, once
the UK ESOP equity pool noted above has been allocated, new awards to UK employees
will also be provided in the form of APT equity. Refer to the sections “US ESOP” and “UK
ESOP” of this Note for further detail.
Significant accounting judgements, estimates and
assumptions
The fair value of options is determined in accordance with the fair market value
of the shares available at the grant date. The fair value of the options has been
calculated using the ten-day VWAP of the five trading days immediately
preceding the grant date.
The value of the US and UK businesses are a significant estimate used to
determine the fair value of the options issued under the US ESOP, the fair value
of the share-based payments component of the Matrix convertible notes and the
options to acquire the remaining 6.5% of Clearpay owned by ThinkSmart. These
fair values are determined by valuations conducted by independent valuers.
Some inputs to the Binomial Model require the application of judgement. The
fair value of options granted during year were estimated on the grant date using
the assumptions set out below:
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life of share
options (years)
Dividend yield
FY20
FY19
FY20
FY19
APT
US ESOP
50-80%
1.00%
4
0%
50%
2.20%
4
0%
60%
1.39%
5
0%
60%
2.51%
5
0%
The expected volatility and life of share options are based on historical data and
current expectations and are not necessarily indicative of actual outcomes.
The weighted average fair value of the awards granted under the APT ESOP and
US ESOP during the year was $32.85 and $2.64, respectively (2019: $10.31 and
$0.27, respectively).
Significant accounting policies
The cost of equity-settled transactions is determined by the fair value at the date
when the grant is made using the Binomial Model. That cost is recognised in
employee benefits expense together with a corresponding increase in equity
reserves over the period in which the service and, where applicable, the
performance conditions are fulfilled (the vesting period).
Where the transaction is with a non-employee, the cost is based on the fair value
of the asset or service received. That cost is recognised, together with a
corresponding increase in other capital reserves or share capital in equity, over
the period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled and/or
the asset or service is delivered/received.
128
Settlement of share options upon vesting are recognised as contributed equity.
The share-based payments expense considers the impact of any non-vesting
conditions but ignores the effect of any service and non-market performance
vesting conditions. Non-market vesting conditions are taken into account when
considering the number of options expected to vest and at the end of each
reporting period, the Group revisits the estimate. Revisions to the prior period
estimate are recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income.
Awards over APT equity
(a) Overview
As noted above, the new Afterpay Equity Incentive Plan was approved by the Group’s
shareholders at the 2019 AGM. Under this plan, eligible employees may be granted
equity awards in the listed company (including options, rights (e.g. RSUs) and restricted
shares), which are subject to vesting conditions. The Group also has a legacy Afterpay
Employee Incentive Plan (adopted prior to listing).
(b) Detail of APT equity awards during the period
Set out below is an overview of the APT equity awards for the year ended 30 June 2020.
Options
During the year, 1,341,092 options were granted to employees, comprising:
• 330,704 LTI options granted to Key Management Personnel (KMP) under the new
Afterpay Equity Incentive Plan approved at the 2019 AGM and in accordance with the
FY20 Executive KMP Remuneration Framework (as detailed in the Remuneration
Report); and
•
1,010,388 LTI options granted to other eligible employees, comprising 401,326 options
granted under the new Afterpay Equity Incentive Plan (approved partway through the
period at the 2019 AGM) and 609,062 LTI options granted under the legacy Afterpay
Employee Incentive Plan (adopted prior to listing).
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
During the year, 1,005,767 RSUs were granted under the new Afterpay Equity Incentive
Plan approved at the 2019 AGM, comprising:
• 50,240 RSUs granted to KMP in accordance with the FY20 Executive KMP
Remuneration Framework (as detailed in the Remuneration Report);
•
135,532 RSUs granted as part of a once-off Global Award to existing Afterpay employees
who had not received share-based awards previously (under any of Afterpay’s equity
incentive plans). These once-off awards are aligned with Afterpay’s “ownership culture”
and create even greater alignment with Afterpay’s shareholders, customers and other
stakeholders; and
• 819,995 RSUs granted to other eligible employees.
Legacy arrangements—loan shares and performance rights
Historically, and as part of Afterpay’s legacy remuneration arrangements, Afterpay has
issued performance rights to certain employees under the legacy Afterpay Employee
Incentive Plan (adopted prior to listing) which vest over a one to two-year period and
loan shares (non-interest bearing, limited recourse loans from the Group for the sole
purpose of acquiring shares in APT) which vest over a one to four-year period. Under
AASB 2 Share-based payment, these performance rights and loan shares are treated as
‘in substance options’ even where the equity instrument itself is not a share option. No
new loan shares or performance rights were granted during the period.
129
Detailed breakdown of APT equity awards
The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the movement in APT equity
awards during the period.
2020
2019
2020
2019
2020
2019
Share options
Loan Shares
Rights1 & RSUs
No.
’000
WAEP
No. WAEP
No. WAEP
No. WAEP
$
’000
$
’000
$
’000
$
14,907
5.49
21,005
1.66
1,143
3.91
1,910
3.62
No.
’000
-
Outstanding at the
beginning of the year
Granted during the year
1,341
32.85
5,444
10.31
Forfeited during the year
(63)
21.61
(187)
1.08
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,006
(8)
No.
’000
35
-
-
Exercised during the
year
Outstanding at the end
of the year2
Exercisable at the end
of the year2
(6,794)
4.12
(11,355)
0.80
(724)
3.56
(767)
3.18
-
(35)
9,391
10.28
14,907
5.49
419
4.50
1,143
3.91
998
5,668
3.65
7,589
1.93
264
3.69
813
3.46
-
-
-
1. Performance rights relating to legacy remuneration arrangements were fully exercised in the prior comparable period and
no further awards have been granted.
2. The outstanding and exercisable share options at the end of the year includes 4,506,000 options which have an exercise price
of between $1.00 and $2.77.
(a) Overview
The Afterpay US, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (US ESOP) is a share option plan
established in 2018 under which the Group may issue options to eligible participants to
acquire shares in Afterpay US, Inc., the Group’s US based subsidiary. The Group has
limited the total US ESOP pool to options over a maximum of 10% of Afterpay US, Inc.
fully diluted shares on issue.
US ESOP options typically vest over a four-year period and are subject to vesting
conditions. On vesting and exercise of US ESOP options, eligible participants are
allocated shares in Afterpay US, Inc. (exercised shares). In order to provide eligible
participants with a mechanism to liquidate their exercised shares, the exercised shares
may be exchanged for fully paid ordinary APT shares in specified circumstances.
Specifically, the exercised shares in Afterpay US, Inc. will be automatically exchanged for
APT shares if conversion of the Matrix Convertible Notes occurs between 5 and 7 years
from the date of issue of the notes (being 19 January 2018) (the Matrix Convertible Note
conversion mechanism is outlined in Note 5).
Exchange for APT shares may also occur at the discretion of the APT Board if the Matrix
Convertible Notes are not converted and are no longer on issue, at least 5 years have
elapsed since the US ESOP was initially adopted and other specified corporate events
have not occurred. Holders of exercised shares do not have a separate right to require
exchange for APT shares.
The number of APT shares which are issued in exchange for exercised shares in Afterpay
US, Inc. will be based on the future value of Afterpay US, Inc. shares (based on the same
valuation as referred to in the Matrix Convertible Notes, or based on an independent
valuation in the case of exchange occurring at the discretion of the APT Board, as
applicable) compared to the volume weighted average price (VWAP) of APT shares over
the 30 trading days up to (but excluding) the date of conversion of the Matrix
Convertible Notes or the date of discretionary conversion by APT (as applicable).
130
The maximum number of APT shares that can be issued under the US ESOP in
exchange for exercised shares cannot exceed 21,777,661 APT shares, being 10% of the
number of APT shares on issue at the date the Matrix Convertible Notes were issued.
This now equates to less than 8% of current APT shares on issue due to subsequent
share issues since the Matrix Convertible Notes were issued. The Group considers it
unlikely that the maximum number of APT shares would be issued on exchange
because for this to happen it would necessarily mean that the value of APT (excluding
Afterpay US, Inc.) is negligible or very low in comparison to the assessed value of
Afterpay US, Inc.
As outlined above, the total US ESOP pool is limited to options over a maximum of 10%
of Afterpay US, Inc. fully diluted shares on issue and the Group has confirmed that there
is no intention to expand this pool. In light of this limit, the Group’s ownership interest in
Afterpay US, Inc. will not decline below 90% due to the exercise of options on Afterpay
US, Inc. shares under the US ESOP and will increase back to 100% following the
exchange of exercised shares for APT shares (assuming no other issues of shares in
Afterpay US, Inc. in the intervening period). The Group has previously confirmed that the
US ESOP is currently at or near the maximum 10% issuance.
The US ESOP was established in 2018 to facilitate the attraction and retention of top-tier
talent in the US, who have been critical to delivering the Group’s US growth aspirations.
While successful in achieving these aims, as noted above, the US ESOP is now closed to
new offers and new incentive awards made to US employees are being provided by way
of awards over APT equity to ensure a globally aligned and consistent approach going
forward.
(b) Detail of US ESOP awards during the period
The table below provides a breakdown of the movement in US ESOP share options
during the period.
Outstanding at the beginning of the year
Granted during the year
Forfeited during the year
Exercised during the year
Outstanding at the end of the year2
Exercisable at the end of the year
2020
2019
Share options
No.
’000
8,998
392
(756)
(2,870)
5,764
1,136
WAEP
$
0.27
2.641
0.30
0.30
0.42
0.43
No.
’000
6,992
4,078
(428)
(1,644)
8,998
382
WAEP
$
0.25
0.27
-
0.27
0.27
0.27
1. The weighted average exercise price (WAEP) of the options granted during the year was $2.64 or US$1.81 per share (2019:
$0.27 or US$0.18). The exercise price is set on a periodic basis by reference to a third-party valuation of Afterpay US, Inc. which
is conducted for US tax purposes.
2. This number includes options that have been exercised early but remain subject to vesting and a re-purchase right by
Afterpay US, Inc.
During the year, the Group received $0.1 million (2019: $2.2 million) from US ESOP option
holders who elected to early exercise unvested options. An early exercise mechanism is
provided under the US ESOP whereby option holders may elect to exercise options and
receive unvested shares in Afterpay US, Inc. before full vesting of the options occurs. Any
unvested options and any such unvested shares may be subject to, among other things,
a repurchase right whereby Afterpay US, Inc. can, at its election, repurchase those
securities if the Board determines it to be appropriate (e.g. if the vesting conditions are
not met).
131
If Afterpay US, Inc. elects to exercise the repurchase right, it has the contractual
obligation to return the funds to the option holder in accordance with the terms of the
US ESOP. The repurchase price is set at the lower of the fair market value and the early
exercise price. A financial liability of $1.1 million (30 June 2019: $1.8 million) has been
recognised as a current financial liability in the financial statements to account for this
potential repurchase event.
The US ESOP provides for options on non-voting shares in Afterpay US, Inc. and when
vested and exercised will be recognised as a non-controlling interest in Afterpay US, Inc.
in accordance with AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements.
UK ESOP
(a) Overview
The Group had previously confirmed that it would establish an equity incentive plan
comprising options over equity in Afterpay’s UK based subsidiary ClearPay Finance
Limited (Clearpay) (UK ESOP), in accordance with the terms of the acquisition of
Clearpay from ThinkSmart. As part of these terms, ThinkSmart agreed to provide for an
equity pool of 3.5% Clearpay shares on issue (out of its remaining 10% shareholding in
Clearpay) that could be used for the purposes of a UK ESOP in the form of options over
the 3.5% of Clearpay shares.
The terms of the UK ESOP have now been finalised and the Board of Afterpay and
Clearpay adopted the UK ESOP Rules on 24 June 2020. The UK ESOP options have both
continued service and performance-based vesting conditions. On exercise of UK ESOP
options, eligible participants will be allocated shares in Clearpay (exercised shares). In
order to provide eligible participants with a mechanism to liquidate their exercised
shares, it is intended that exercised shares may be exchanged for fully paid ordinary APT
shares or cash (at the Group’s election) in specified circumstances. Specifically, the
exercised shares in Clearpay may only be exchanged for APT shares or cash at the same
time as the exercise of the Clearpay Put and Call Option by APT or ThinkSmart, as
applicable (the Clearpay Put and Call Option mechanism is outlined in Note 5). If UK
ESOP options are not exercised and exchanged with such event, the UK ESOP options
will lapse. This mechanism is intended to ensure that there are no outstanding UK ESOP
options once APT moves to a 100% shareholding in Clearpay via exercise of the Clearpay
Put and Call Option.
Further, it is intended that exercised shares in Clearpay will be exchanged into APT
shares or cash at the same valuation of Clearpay shares as the Clearpay Put and Call
Option (as applicable). Consistent with the Clearpay Put and Call Option, the number of
APT shares that may be issued and exchanged as consideration for the exercised shares
in Clearpay will be based on the value of the exercised shares in Clearpay divided by the
volume weighted average price (VWAP) of APT shares over the 5 trading days up to the
date of option exercise.
As noted above, consideration for exercised shares may be paid by the Group in cash or
APT shares (at the Group’s election). The maximum number of APT shares that can be
issued in exchange for exercised Clearpay shares under the proposed UK ESOP will be
subject to a cap of 3% of APT shares on issue at the date of first adoption of the UK ESOP
Rules on 24 June 2020, being 267,967,466 shares. Separately, and as outlined in Note 5,
any exchange of Clearpay shares held by ThinkSmart as a result of its exercise of the put
option is capped at 5% of APT shares on issue at the time of exchange. The Group
considers it unlikely that the maximum number of APT shares of 8% across the Clearpay
Put and Call Option and the UK ESOP would ever be issued because for this to happen
it would necessarily mean that the value of APT (excluding Clearpay) is negligible or very
low in comparison to the assessed value of Clearpay.
The UK ESOP was contemplated in the terms of the acquisition of Clearpay to facilitate
the attraction and retention of top-tier talent in the UK, who will be critical to delivering
132
the Group’s UK growth aspirations. As noted above, after the UK ESOP pool has been
fully allocated to UK employees, new incentive awards made to UK employees will be
provided by way of awards over APT equity to ensure a globally aligned and consistent
approach going forward.
(b) Detail of UK ESOP awards during the period
As noted above, the Board of Afterpay and Clearpay adopted the UK ESOP Rules on 24
June 2020. No options had been granted under the UK ESOP as at 30 June 2020; the
Group is currently in the process of allocating the 3.5% pool noted above.
Matrix Convertible Notes
The Group determined the US$0.1 million Matrix Convertible Notes included a share-
based payment component, for services to be delivered by Matrix. The fair value of the
Matrix Convertible Notes when issued of US$1.7 million exceeded their face value and
were determined to be a share-based payment in accordance with AASB 2 Share-based
payment.
The fair value of the Convertible Notes was determined by using a multi-stage process,
including calculating the equity value of Afterpay US, Inc., which was then used as an
input into the Binomial Model. The share-based payments will be recognised over the
expected period the services will be performed.
The Matrix Convertible Notes are outlined in Note 5.
21. Key management personnel
Compensation of Key Management Personnel
Short-term employee benefits
Post-employment benefits
Other long-term benefits
Share-based payments
Total compensation
2020
$
2019
$
3,083,648
2,997,685
115,174
107,316
24,796
10,257
4,269,242
17,530,018
7,492,860
20,645,276
Compensation of Key Management Personnel (KMP) includes Executive KMP and Non-
Executive Directors. Compensation details for KMP are included in Sections 5.7 and 6.5
of the Remuneration Report.
133
Items not recognised in the
financial statements
22. Commitments and contingencies
Contingent liabilities and contingent assets
Details of contingent liabilities and contingent assets where the probability of future
payments is not considered remote are set out below as well as details of contingent
liabilities, which although considered remote, the Directors consider should be
disclosed as they are not disclosed elsewhere in the notes to the financial statements.
(a) Contingent liabilities – AUSTRAC
On 12 June 2019, AUSTRAC issued a notice (the ‘Notice’) requiring an external audit of
Afterpay Pty Ltd (Afterpay) to examine its compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering
and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF), the ‘Notice’.
Mr Neil Jeans of AML/CTF firm ‘Initialism’ was appointed as the auditor on 29 July 2019.
The Final Audit Report (Final Report) was provided to AUSTRAC on 22 November 2019.
The Final Report refers to matters of historic non-compliance by Afterpay and makes
recommendations in relation to Afterpay’s ongoing AML/CTF compliance. The Final
Report states that the majority of these matters have been addressed.
Subsequent to receipt of the Final Report, AUSTRAC requested clarification of a number
of matters included in the Final Report. AUSTRAC is considering the Final Report,
together with the Group’s subsequent responses, and will determine whether it will
take further action. In cases of non-compliance with the AML/CTF Act, the AUSTRAC
Chief Executive Officer may apply for civil penalty orders under s176 of the AML/CTF Act.
If the Federal Court is satisfied that a reporting entity has contravened a civil penalty
provision, then the Federal Court may order a pecuniary penalty to be paid to the
Commonwealth.
Currently, it is not possible to determine the extent or timing of any potential financial
impact to the Group that might result from the AML/CTF compliance audit.
Consequently, no amounts have been included as contingent liabilities at the reporting
date.
(b) Legal commitments and claims
Claims can be raised by customers and suppliers against the Group in the ordinary
course of business. There were no outstanding claims at 30 June 2020 or 30 June 2019
which required recognition of a provision or contingent liability.
(c) Bank guarantees
The Group had entered into bank guarantee arrangements totalling $2.9 million of
which $2.0 million has been cross guaranteed as part of a Consolidated sub-agency
agreement. The remaining guarantee is part of the Group’s normal business operations.
134
23. Events occurring after the reporting period
With the exception of the items listed below, no other matters or circumstances have
occurred subsequent to 30 June 2020 that have significantly affected, or may
significantly affect, the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the
state of affairs of the Group in subsequent financial years.
(a) Capital raising
Subsequent to 30 June 2020, the Group completed a $786.2 million capital raising,
which comprised a $650.0 million Institutional Placement and a $136.2 million Share
Purchase Plan (SPP).
(b) Pagantis Acquisition
On 21 August 2020, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Group entered into a Share
Purchase Agreement (SPA) with NBQ Corporate SLU (NBQ) to acquire 100% of the
shares outstanding in Pagantis SAU and PMT Technology SLU (collectively, Pagantis).
Pagantis currently provides a range of buy now, pay later and traditional credit services
across Spain, France and Italy with regulatory approval to also operate in Portugal and a
pending application to passport its payment institution licence into Germany.
Afterpay is acquiring the Pagantis corporate entities, regulatory licences, multilingual
technology stack and platform, intellectual property, contracts with relevant service
providers, and an experienced, fully staffed team (69 FTEs) with local knowledge of the
EU market and regulatory landscape. Pagantis is authorised and supervised by the Bank
of Spain and has a Payment Institution licence (Licence). This Licence is eligible for
“passporting” to other EU member states and will provide Afterpay with the regulatory
structure that is required to operate across all EU member states (subject to regulatory
approval from the Bank of Spain to the proposed change of control).
Pagantis' existing consumer fee instalment and credit card offerings will be
discontinued post completion of the acquisition.
As part of the SPA, NBQ will receive a minimum €50m in consideration (subject to
customary adjustments), payable as follows:
• Upfront Consideration - €5 million in cash payable at completion; and
• Deferred Consideration in the form of a Convertible Note - €45 million in cash, payable 3
years post completion. Deferred Consideration can exceed €45 million, with any excess
being payable in cash or shares in Afterpay Limited (at Afterpay’s election), provided the
equity value of Pagantis exceeds €45 million, 3 years post completion.
Deferred Consideration received by NBQ will be determined by reference to the equity
value (Equity Value) of Pagantis, 3 years post completion.
If the Equity Value of Pagantis:
•
Is less than or equal to €45m; NBQ will receive €45m in Deferred Consideration payable
in cash; or
• Exceeds €45m; NBQ will receive €45 million, payable in cash, plus:
> 50% of any Equity Value above €45 million, up to €100 million; plus
> 40% of any Equity Value above €100 million, up to €150 million; plus
>
10% of any Equity Value above €150 million in Deferred Consideration.
Any Deferred Consideration above the €45 million minimum is payable in cash or
Afterpay scrip, at Afterpay’s election. The maximum Deferred Consideration payable
(whether in cash or Afterpay shares) will be capped at 3% of the total Afterpay shares on
issue at completion, multiplied by the 5-day volume weighted average price, 3 years
post completion.
135
The Equity Value will be determined by agreement between Afterpay and NBQ or,
failing that, independent experts with reference to agreed valuation principles.
Payment of Deferred Consideration may be accelerated if Afterpay is subject to a
change of control.
The acquisition will accelerate the planned launch into Europe and continues the
preferred model of partnering with a local market presence to de-risk global expansion
(consistent with the Company’s successful UK expansion strategy). Pagantis currently
provides a range of buy now, pay later and traditional credit services across Spain,
France and Italy, with regulatory approval to also operate in Portugal and a pending
application to passport its payment institution licence into Germany.
The financial effects of this transaction have not been recognised at 30 June 2020. The
operating results and assets and liabilities of Pagantis will be consolidated following
completion of the transaction.
Completion of the acquisition is expected to occur in or before December 2020, and is
subject to certain conditions being satisfied, principally regulatory approval for the
acquisition being granted by the Bank of Spain.
(c) EmpatKali Acquisition
On 26 August 2020, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Group entered into a Share
Purchase Agreement (SPA) to acquire 100% of the shares outstanding from the
founders (Founders) of PT Empat Kali Indonesia (EmpatKali). EmpatKali is a small,
Singapore-based, buy now, pay later company operating in Indonesia.
As part of the SPA, the Founders will receive a total of US$2m in consideration (subject
to customary adjustments) payable in Afterpay Limited (APT) shares.
The financial effects of this transaction have not been recognised at 30 June 2020. The
operating results and assets and liabilities of EmpatKali will be consolidated following
completion of the transaction. Completion of the acquisition is expected to occur before
December 2020.
136
Other information
24. Auditor’s remuneration
2020
$
2019
$
Amounts received or due and receivable by EY (Australia) for:
Total audit or review of the financial report of the entity and any
other entity in the consolidated Group
1,383,886
997,061
Support of new accounting standards implementation
-
206,760
Other assurance services
Other non-audit services
81,920
73,840
-
-
Total auditor's remuneration
1,465,806
1,277,661
25. Other significant accounting policies
New and amended standards adopted by the Group
The following new accounting standards and interpretations became applicable and
were adopted during the current reporting period:
• AASB 16 Leases; and
• AASB Interpretation 23 Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments.
The Group has also chosen to early adopt the following amendment:
• Amendments to AASB 101 and AASB 108 Definition of material
The impact of the adoption of AASB 16 is disclosed below. The adoption of AASB
Interpretation 23 and the amendments to AASB 101 and AASB 108 did not have a
material impact on the Group’s accounting policies and do not require retrospective
adjustments.
A number of other amendments also became effective during the period, but did not
have a material impact on the Group’s accounting policies.
AASB 16 Leases
The Group adopted AASB 16 using the modified retrospective method with the date of
initial application of 1 July 2019 and, as required under the specific transitional provisions
in the standard, the Group has not restated comparatives for the 2019 reporting period.
The reclassifications and the adjustments arising from the new leasing rules are
therefore recognised in the opening balance sheet on 1 July 2019.
On adoption of AASB 16, the Group recognised lease liabilities in relation to leases which
had previously been classified as ‘operating leases’ under the principles of AASB 117
Leases. These liabilities were measured at the present value of the remaining lease
payments, discounted using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate as of 1 July 2019.
The Group recognised a right-of-use asset at the date of initial application at the
amount equal to the lease liability, adjusted by the amount of any prepaid or accrued
lease payments relating to that lease recognised in the statement of financial position
immediately before the date of initial application.
137
For leases previously classified as finance leases in accordance with AASB 117, the
carrying amount of the right-of-use asset and the lease liability at the date of initial
application was the carrying amount of the lease asset and lease liability immediately
before that date measured applying AASB 117.
The table below presents a reconciliation of the operating lease commitments as
disclosed in the Group’s 30 June 2019 financial statements, to the lease liabilities
recognised on the transition date:
Reconciliation of operating lease commitments
Operating lease commitments disclosed as at 30 June 2019
(Less): discounting using the lessee's incremental borrowing rate at the date of
initial application of 4.70% (weighted average incremental borrowing rate)
Add: finance lease liabilities recognised as at 30 June 2019
Add: adjustments as a result of a different treatment of extension options
(Less): contracts reassessed as low value assets
Lease liabilities recognised as at 1 July 2019
Of which are:
Current lease liabilities
Non-current lease liabilities
$’000
7,119
(261)
342
1,382
(115)
8,467
4,427
4,040
The change in accounting policy affected the following items in the Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position on 1 July 2019:
• Right-of-use assets – increase by $8.6 million
• Property, plant and equipment – decrease by $0.3 million
• Prepayments (included in Other assets) – decrease by $0.4 million
• Lease liabilities (included in Interest bearing loans and borrowings) – increase by $8.1
million
• Other provisions – decrease by $0.2 million
• Net impact on retained earnings on 1 July 2019 was $nil.
In applying AASB 16 for the first time, the Group has used the following practical
expedients required by the standard:
•
•
•
•
•
the use of a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with reasonably similar
characteristics;
reliance on previous assessments on whether leases are onerous;
the accounting for leases with a remaining lease term of less than 12 months as at 1 July
2019 as short-term leases;
the exclusion of initial direct costs for the measurement of the right-of-use asset at the
date of initial application; and
the use of hindsight in determining the lease term where the contract contains options
to extend or terminate the lease.
The Group has also elected not to reassess whether a contract is or contains a lease at
the date of initial application. Instead, for contracts entered into before the transition
date the Group relied on its assessment made applying AASB 117 and Interpretation 4
Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease.
138
Directors’ declaration
In accordance with a resolution of the Directors of Afterpay Limited, I state that:
In the opinion of the Directors:
(a)
The financial statements and notes of Afterpay Limited for the year ended 30 June 2020
are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
(i)
giving a true and fair view of its financial position as at 30 June 2020 and of the
Group’s performance for the year ended on that date; and
(ii)
complying with Accounting standards (including the Australian Accounting
Interpretations) and Corporations Regulations 2001.
(b)
There are reasonable grounds to believe that the Group will be able to pay its debts as
and when they become due and payable;
(c)
The remuneration disclosures set out in the Directors’ Report comply with Accounting
Standards AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures and the Corporations Regulations 2001;
and
(d)
The financial statements and notes also comply with International Financial Reporting
Standards as disclosed in the financial statements.
The Directors have been given the declarations by the Chief Executive Officer and
Managing Director required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.
On behalf of the Board.
Elana Rubin
Chair, Independent Non-Executive Director
Melbourne
27 August 2020
139
Auditor’s Report
Auditor’s
Report.
Ernst & Young
8 Exhibition Street
Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
GPO Box 67 Melbourne VIC 3001
Tel: +61 3 9288 8000
Fax: +61 3 8650 7777
ey.com/au
Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Afterpay Limited
Report on the Audit of the Financial Report
Opinion
We have audited the financial report of Afterpay Limited (the Company) and its subsidiaries (collectively
the Group), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2020, the
consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and
consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes to the financial statements, including
a summary of significant accounting policies, and the directors' declaration.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act
giving a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of the Group as at 30 June 2020
and of its consolidated financial performance for the year ended on that date; and
complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under
those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Report section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the auditor
independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and the ethical requirements of the Accounting
Professional and Ethical Standards Board’s APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
(including Independence Standards) (the Code) that are relevant to our audit of the financial report in
Australia. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
2001, including:
a)
b)
Basis for Opinion
our opinion.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our
audit of the financial report of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit
of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, but we do not provide a separate
opinion on these matters. For each matter below, our description of how our audit addressed the matter
is provided in that context.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
88
Auditor’s
Report.
Ernst & Young
8 Exhibition Street
Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
GPO Box 67 Melbourne VIC 3001
Tel: +61 3 9288 8000
Fax: +61 3 8650 7777
ey.com/au
Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Afterpay Limited
Report on the Audit of the Financial Report
Opinion
We have audited the financial report of Afterpay Limited (the Company) and its subsidiaries (collectively
the Group), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2020, the
consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and
consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes to the financial statements, including
a summary of significant accounting policies, and the directors' declaration.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act
2001, including:
a)
b)
giving a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of the Group as at 30 June 2020
and of its consolidated financial performance for the year ended on that date; and
complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under
those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Report section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the auditor
independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and the ethical requirements of the Accounting
Professional and Ethical Standards Board’s APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
(including Independence Standards) (the Code) that are relevant to our audit of the financial report in
Australia. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our opinion.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our
audit of the financial report of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit
of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, but we do not provide a separate
opinion on these matters. For each matter below, our description of how our audit addressed the matter
is provided in that context.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
88
We have fulfilled the responsibilities described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Financial Report section of our report, including in relation to these matters. Accordingly, our audit
included the performance of procedures designed to respond to our assessment of the risks of material
misstatement of the financial report. The results of our audit procedures, including the procedures
performed to address the matters below, provide the basis for our audit opinion on the accompanying
financial report.
Capitalisation of internally generated intangible assets
Why significant
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
The Group’s income is generated through the
processing of transactions with its customers
through its internally developed software
platforms disclosed as Core Technology in Note
11 of the financial report.
Software development is core to the Company’s
operations and requires judgement as to whether
it meets the capitalisation criteria as per AASB
138 Intangible Assets. Costs incurred during the
year that were capitalised to the Core
Technology totalled $38.9 million and the net
book value of Core Technology amounted to
$61.6 million.
The capitalisation of internally generated
intangible assets was a key audit matter due to
the significant management judgements,
including:
• whether the costs incurred relate to research
costs that should be expensed or
development costs that are eligible for
capitalisation;
•
•
the assessment of future economic benefits
and the technical feasibility of the product;
and
the timing of amortisation and the useful
lives for projects.
Our audit procedures included the following:
• We selected a sample of projects to determine
the nature and status of the project and assessed
whether the project met the capitalisation
requirements of the Australian Accounting
Standards.
•
For a sample of capitalised employee and sub-
contractor costs we agreed the pay rates to
employment contracts, supplier invoices and
obtained evidence to support the time charged to
development projects.
• We assessed the useful lives and amortisation
rate allocated to capitalised development costs
as well as recalculating the amortisation expense
for the period for all intangible assets.
• We assessed the consistency of the capitalisation
methodology applied by the Group in comparison
to prior reporting periods.
• We assessed the adequacy of the related
disclosures in the financial report in respect of
the capitalised costs.
Provision for expected credit losses on Afterpay consumer receivables
Why significant
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
The nature of the Group’s business is to
Our audit procedures included the following:
assume the credit risk of merchant
transactions with consumers. Under AASB 9
Financial Instruments, the Group has applied
the forward-looking expected credit loss (ECL)
model.
With the Coronavirus outbreak being declared a
pandemic by the World Health Organization in
March 2020, the Group has assessed the
impact to trading over the last three months of
the financial year and has incorporated any
changes in loss rates along with forward-
looking factors in the measurement of the ECL.
A provision of $34.0 million has been
recognised at 30 June 2020.
This was a key audit matter as significant
judgement is involved in determining the
provision for expected credit losses based on
the estimated loss rates on outstanding
receivables.
The Group’s disclosure for the receivables
impairment on consumer receivables is
disclosed in Note 7 of the financial report.
• We assessed whether the methodology applied by
management in the model is in accordance with
the requirements of AASB 9.
• We assessed the mathematical accuracy of the
model and recalculated the aging of the consumer
receivables at period end.
• We assessed the integrity of assumptions around
current and historical loss rates for receivables
throughout the period. We compared these
assumptions to those of the prior period and
investigated any significant variances.
• We assessed the impact of the Coronavirus
outbreak on the loss rates along with forward-
looking factors in the measurement of the ECL.
• We assessed the adequacy of the provision by
comparing the post period end cash receipts to the
outstanding consumer receivables at period end.
• We assessed the adequacy of the related
disclosures in the financial report in respect of the
consumer receivables.
Information Other than the Financial Report and Auditor’s Report Thereon
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information
included in the Company’s 2020 Annual Report, but does not include the financial report and our
auditor’s report thereon.
Our opinion on the financial report does not cover the other information and accordingly we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon, with the exception of the Remuneration Report and
our related assurance opinion.
In connection with our audit of the financial report, our responsibility is to read the other information and,
in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial report or
our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other
information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
We have fulfilled the responsibilities described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Financial Report section of our report, including in relation to these matters. Accordingly, our audit
included the performance of procedures designed to respond to our assessment of the risks of material
misstatement of the financial report. The results of our audit procedures, including the procedures
performed to address the matters below, provide the basis for our audit opinion on the accompanying
financial report.
Capitalisation of internally generated intangible assets
Why significant
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
The Group’s income is generated through the
Our audit procedures included the following:
processing of transactions with its customers
through its internally developed software
platforms disclosed as Core Technology in Note
11 of the financial report.
• We selected a sample of projects to determine
the nature and status of the project and assessed
whether the project met the capitalisation
requirements of the Australian Accounting
Software development is core to the Company’s
Standards.
operations and requires judgement as to whether
it meets the capitalisation criteria as per AASB
138 Intangible Assets. Costs incurred during the
year that were capitalised to the Core
Technology totalled $38.9 million and the net
book value of Core Technology amounted to
$61.6 million.
The capitalisation of internally generated
intangible assets was a key audit matter due to
the significant management judgements,
including:
• whether the costs incurred relate to research
costs that should be expensed or
development costs that are eligible for
capitalisation;
the assessment of future economic benefits
and the technical feasibility of the product;
•
•
and
the timing of amortisation and the useful
lives for projects.
•
For a sample of capitalised employee and sub-
contractor costs we agreed the pay rates to
employment contracts, supplier invoices and
obtained evidence to support the time charged to
development projects.
• We assessed the useful lives and amortisation
rate allocated to capitalised development costs
as well as recalculating the amortisation expense
for the period for all intangible assets.
• We assessed the consistency of the capitalisation
methodology applied by the Group in comparison
to prior reporting periods.
• We assessed the adequacy of the related
disclosures in the financial report in respect of
the capitalised costs.
Provision for expected credit losses on Afterpay consumer receivables
Why significant
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
The nature of the Group’s business is to
assume the credit risk of merchant
transactions with consumers. Under AASB 9
Financial Instruments, the Group has applied
the forward-looking expected credit loss (ECL)
model.
With the Coronavirus outbreak being declared a
pandemic by the World Health Organization in
March 2020, the Group has assessed the
impact to trading over the last three months of
the financial year and has incorporated any
changes in loss rates along with forward-
looking factors in the measurement of the ECL.
A provision of $34.0 million has been
recognised at 30 June 2020.
This was a key audit matter as significant
judgement is involved in determining the
provision for expected credit losses based on
the estimated loss rates on outstanding
receivables.
The Group’s disclosure for the receivables
impairment on consumer receivables is
disclosed in Note 7 of the financial report.
Our audit procedures included the following:
• We assessed whether the methodology applied by
management in the model is in accordance with
the requirements of AASB 9.
• We assessed the mathematical accuracy of the
model and recalculated the aging of the consumer
receivables at period end.
• We assessed the integrity of assumptions around
current and historical loss rates for receivables
throughout the period. We compared these
assumptions to those of the prior period and
investigated any significant variances.
• We assessed the impact of the Coronavirus
outbreak on the loss rates along with forward-
looking factors in the measurement of the ECL.
• We assessed the adequacy of the provision by
comparing the post period end cash receipts to the
outstanding consumer receivables at period end.
• We assessed the adequacy of the related
disclosures in the financial report in respect of the
consumer receivables.
Information Other than the Financial Report and Auditor’s Report Thereon
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information
included in the Company’s 2020 Annual Report, but does not include the financial report and our
auditor’s report thereon.
Our opinion on the financial report does not cover the other information and accordingly we do not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon, with the exception of the Remuneration Report and
our related assurance opinion.
In connection with our audit of the financial report, our responsibility is to read the other information and,
in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial report or
our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other
information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Responsibilities of the Directors for the Financial Report
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true
and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for
such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial
report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
In preparing the financial report, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters relating to going concern and using the
going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Report
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report as a whole is free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes
our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if,
individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of
users taken on the basis of this financial report.
As part of an audit in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards, we exercise professional
judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
•
•
•
•
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud
or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence
that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a
material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud
may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of
internal control.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures made by the directors.
Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and,
based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If
we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s
report to the related disclosures in the financial report or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to
modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our
auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to continue as
a going concern.
•
•
Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial report, including the
disclosures, and whether the financial report represents the underlying transactions and events in a
manner that achieves fair presentation.
Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or
business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the financial report. We are
responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group audit. We remain solely
responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the
audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we
identify during our audit.
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements
regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may
reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, actions taken to eliminate
threats or safeguards applied.
From the matters communicated to the directors, we determine those matters that were of most
significance in the audit of the financial report of the current year and are therefore the key audit
matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public
disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should
not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be
expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on the Audit of the Remuneration Report
Opinion on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 53 to 83 of the directors' report for the year
ended 30 June 2020.
In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Afterpay Limited for the year ended 30 June 2020, complies
with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Responsibilities of the Directors for the Financial Report
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true
and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for
such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial
report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
In preparing the financial report, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters relating to going concern and using the
going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Report
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report as a whole is free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes
our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if,
individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of
users taken on the basis of this financial report.
As part of an audit in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards, we exercise professional
judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
•
•
•
•
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud
or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence
that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a
material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud
may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of
internal control.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures made by the directors.
Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and,
based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If
we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s
report to the related disclosures in the financial report or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to
modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our
auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to continue as
a going concern.
•
•
Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial report, including the
disclosures, and whether the financial report represents the underlying transactions and events in a
manner that achieves fair presentation.
Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or
business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the financial report. We are
responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group audit. We remain solely
responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the
audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we
identify during our audit.
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements
regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may
reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, actions taken to eliminate
threats or safeguards applied.
From the matters communicated to the directors, we determine those matters that were of most
significance in the audit of the financial report of the current year and are therefore the key audit
matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public
disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should
not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be
expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
Report on the Audit of the Remuneration Report
Opinion on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 53 to 83 of the directors' report for the year
ended 30 June 2020.
In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Afterpay Limited for the year ended 30 June 2020, complies
with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Responsibilities
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration
Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian
Auditing Standards.
Ernst & Young
David McGregor
Partner
Melbourne
27 August 2020
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration
Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian
Responsibilities
Auditing Standards.
Ernst & Young
David McGregor
Partner
Melbourne
27 August 2020
Additional Securities
Exchange Information
In accordance with ASX Listing Rule 4.10, the Company provides the following
information to shareholders not elsewhere disclosed in this Annual Report. The
information provided is current as at 21 August 2020.
Corporate Governance Statement
The Company’s Directors and management are committed to conducting the Group’s
business in an ethical manner and in accordance with high standards of corporate
governance. The Board continually reviews the Company’s governance policies and
practices to ensure that they remain appropriate in light of changes in corporate
governance expectations and developments. The Company has reviewed its corporate
governance framework against the 4th edition of the ASX Principles and
Recommendations and will be reporting against the 4th edition for the financial year
ending 30 June 2021. The Company’s corporate governance policies and charters are all
available at https://www.afterpay.com/en-AU/corporate-governance/.
For the year ended 30 June 2020, the Company's governance practices were consistent
with the 3rd edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations
(ASX Principles and Recommendations) unless otherwise indicated in the Corporate
Governance Statement. Further details of the Company’s corporate governance
framework and practices are described in the Company's Corporate Governance
Statement.
The Company's Corporate Governance Statement, together with the ASX Appendix 4G,
have been lodged with the ASX and are available at https://www.afterpay.com/en-AU
/corporate-governance/.
Substantial holders
As at 21 August 2020, the names of the substantial holders of the Company and the
number of equity securities in which those substantial holders and their associates have
a relevant interest, as disclosed in substantial holding notices given to the Company, are
as follows:
Holder of Equity Securities
Anthony Eisen
Nicholas Molnar
Vanguard Group
Mitsubishi UFK Financial Group, Inc
Tencent Holdings Limited and Tencent
Mobility Limited
Number of Equity
Securities held
% of total issued
securities capital in
relevant class
18,405,963
18,405,963
15,714,991
13,928,673
13,355,399
6.62
6.62
5.61
5.01
5.00
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
147
Number of holders
As at 21 August 2020, the number of holders in each class of equity securities is as
follows:
Class of Equity Securities
Fully paid ordinary shares
Options to acquire ordinary shares
Convertible Note
Restricted Stock Units
Number of holders
57,208
75
2
428
Less than marketable parcels of ordinary shares (UMP Shares)
The number of holders of less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares based on the
closing market price at 21 August 2020 is as follows:
Total Shares
UMP Shares
UMP Holders
% of issued shares held by UMP
holders
280,107,063
7
459
0.0003
Voting rights of equity securities
The only class of equity securities on issue in the Company which carries voting rights is
fully paid ordinary shares. As at 21 August 2020, there were 57,208 holders of a total of
280,107,063 ordinary shares of the Company.
At a general meeting of the Company, every holder of ordinary shares present in person
or by proxy, attorney or representative has one vote on a show of hands and, on a poll,
one vote for each ordinary share held. On a poll, every member (or his or her proxy,
attorney or representative) is entitled to vote for each fully paid share held and, in
respect of each partly paid share, is entitled to a fraction of a vote equivalent to the
proportion which the amount paid up (not credited) on that partly paid share bears to
the total amounts paid and payable (excluding amounts credited) on that share.
Amounts paid in advance of a call are ignored when calculating the proportion.
Distribution of holders of equity securities
The distribution of holders of equity securities on issue in the Company as at 21 August
2020 is as follows:
Distribution of ordinary shareholders
Holdings Ranges
1 – 1,000
1,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 – 100,000
100,001 – 999,999,999
Holders
50,461
5,664
590
442
51
Total Units
9,942,865
11,682,874
4,121,274
10,077,863
244,282,187
Totals
57,208
280,107,063
%
3.55
4.17
1.47
3.60
87.21
100
148
Holders
Total Units
Distribution of option holders
Holdings Ranges
1 – 1,000
1,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 – 100,000
100,001 – 999,999,999
Totals
-
4
4
51
16
75
Distribution of Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) holders
Holdings Ranges
1 – 1,000
1,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 – 100,000
100,001 – 999,999,999
Holders
334
52
27
14
1
-
20,000
27,666
2,222,655
6,929,667
9,199,988
Total Units
132,235
150,259
201,889
361,776
134,819
Totals
428
980,978
%
-
0.22
0.30
24.16
75.32
100
%
13.48
15.32
20.58
36.88
13.74
100
The Company has issued one convertible note to each of two holders, Matrix Partners X
L.P and Weston & Co X LLC.
Class of restricted
securities
Type of restriction
Number of
securities
End date of escrow period
Ordinary shares
Voluntary escrow
7,017,544
29 November 2020
Ordinary shares
Voluntary escrow
1,440,213
16 January 2021
Ordinary shares
Voluntary escrow
1,440,213
16 January 2025
Ordinary shares
Voluntary escrow
418,926
On APT’s instructions
The number of each class of unquoted equity securities on issue, and the number of
holders in each such class, are as follows:
Class of Equity Securities
Convertible Note
Options to acquire ordinary shares
Restricted Stock Units
Number of unquoted
Equity Securities
Number of holders
2
9,199,988
980,978
2
75
428
No person holds 20% or more of any class of Unquoted Equity Securities on issue.
149
Twenty largest shareholders
The Company only has one class of quoted securities, being ordinary shares. The names
of the 20 largest holders of ordinary shares, and the number of ordinary shares and
percentage of capital held by each holder is as follows:
Rank
Holder Name
Balance at 21
August 2020
%
HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
60,547,145
21.62
J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
39,815,164
14.21
CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED
24,643,428
8.80
Afterpay Limited ACN 618 280 649
HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED-GSCO ECA
18,485,366
6.60
ANTHONY MATHEW EISEN
18,405,963
6.57
NICHOLAS MOLNAR PTY LTD
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above