1
Company Overview
As a leading Tier 1 global automotive supplier, AAM delivers
driveline and drivetrain systems and components around the
world. Our intense focus on engineering and manufacturing
allows us to build value for our customers through quality,
technology leadership, and operational excellence.
• Brazil
• China
• Germany
• India
• Japan
• Luxembourg
• Mexico
• Poland
• Scotland
• South Korea
• Sweden
• Thailand
• United States
• FOUNDED: 1994• CUSTOMERS: MORE THAN 100 WORLDWIDE• ASSOCIATES: APPROXIMATELY 12,600• LOCATIONS: MORE THAN 30 FACILITIES IN 13 COUNTRIES FINANCIAL
HIGHLIGHTS
(in millions, except per share data)
2014
$ 3,696.0
522.8
267.6
143.0
1.85
$
$
249.2
3,259.2
1,523.4
113.4
$
$
$
2013
3,207.3
478.7
240.3
94.5
1.23
154.0
3,027.5
1,559.1
40.5
Statement of income data
Net sales
Gross profit
Operating income
Net income
Diluted earnings per share
Balance sheet data
Cash and cash equivalents
Total assets
Total long-term debt
AAM stockholders’ equity
Statement of cash flows data
Cash provided by operating activities
Cash used in investing activities
$
318.4
(195.3)
$
223.0
(218.7)
CONTENTS
To Our Stakeholders ...............................4
Technology ...........................................12
Leadership ...........................................16
Stockholder Information .......................17
TO OUR
STAKEHOLDERS
2014 was another successful year for AAM,
characterized by sales growth that continues to
outpace the industry and financial performance
that was highlighted by solid profitability and
improved cash flow. We made great strides
in achieving global operational stability while
delivering world-class quality products. We
are confident in AAM’s future as our focus on
technology leadership and product innovation
has resulted in a solid new business backlog that
serves as the foundation for our strong profitable
growth opportunities.
David C. Dauch
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
4
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
In 2014, AAM’s net sales were nearly $3.7 billion, up approximately 15% on
a year-over-year basis—almost triple the growth rate for the industry. From
2009-2014, AAM’s compound annual growth rate of sales (CAGR) has
been nearly 20%. This is significantly faster than the industry growth rate
observed for the past five years, whether measured as growth in the U.S.
Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) of sales at 9.6% or North America
light vehicle builds at 14.7%.
For the full year of 2014, AAM delivered cash from operating activities of
nearly $320 million. AAM’s strong financial performance and cash flow
generation have allowed us to make great progress in improving our capital
structure. We now have the financial flexibility to invest in our future and
support the execution of AAM’s long-term strategic objectives.
5
SALES
GROWTH
AAM’s strong position in the light truck market in 2014, as well as our increased
presence in the all-wheel-drive (AWD) passenger car and crossover vehicle
markets, are the key drivers of our sales growth.
Sales supporting AAM’s North American light truck business were up
approximately 16% on a year-over-year basis, driven by higher production
volumes for our North American light truck programs—mainly GM’s full-size
pickup trucks and SUVs and Ram’s heavy-duty pickups.
Sales in our passenger car and crossover vehicle business were up an
impressive 73% versus 2013. This increase was primarily due to higher sales
of our EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system, which has now launched on the
2014 Jeep Cherokee and the 2015 Chrysler 200.
AAM’s non-GM sales grew nearly 30% on a year-over-year basis to approximately
$1.2 billion. This is almost double the growth rate for our company in total
this year.
6
© General Motors
DIVERSIFICATION
In 2014, AAM made excellent progress diversifying our
customer base, achieving new business wins and launching
new programs with customers such as Fiat Chrysler
Automobiles (FCA), Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, Ford, Nissan,
Jaguar Land Rover, Honda and others. This fast-paced growth
has allowed us to make significant gains in AAM’s business
diversification, examples of which include:
• Non-GM sales have more than tripled since 2009 –
tracking at $1.2 billion in 2014.
• Approximately 70% of AAM’s $825 million new and
incremental business backlog for 2015 to 2017 is for
customers other than GM.
• Approximately 75% of our new and incremental business
backlog for 2015 to 2017 supports passenger car and
CUV programs.
• Approximately 85% of AAM’s new and incremental
business backlog for 2015 to 2017 is for programs sourced
outside of the United States.
AAM’s new and incremental business backlog includes product
programs that feature new and innovative product technologies
including: AAM’s industry-first EcoTrac Disconnecting AWD
System; AAM’s high-efficiency technologies; e-AAM™
hybrid & electric driveline systems; and AAM’s SYLENT
driveshaft technology.
With a continued focus on product innovation and product-line
extensions, AAM successfully expanded and broadened our
product portfolio and customer base in 2014, and has gained
momentum for further diversification in the future.
7
LAUNCH ACTIVITY
AND KEY PROGRAMS
Over the past five years, AAM has completed
100 major product and facility launches. In
2014 alone, AAM successfully executed 16
product launches. These programs have
been key in supporting our sales growth
and instrumental in helping us achieve our
diversification and global growth objectives.
In 2014, AAM launched new and improved
driveline systems for two of our largest North
American light truck programs: GM’s next-
generation full-size SUVs and heavy-duty
series pickup trucks and Ram’s heavy-duty
pickup trucks. Our Guanajuato Manufacturing
Complex and our Three Rivers Manufacturing
Facility were instrumental in the success of
these program launches.
AAM’s innovative and fuel-efficient EcoTrac Disconnecting AWD System received both awards
and accolades in 2014. EcoTrac was featured on the 2014 Jeep Cherokee, named by MotorWeek
as the Best Small Utility Vehicle of the Year, and the Chrysler 200. AAM was also named a 2014
Automotive News PACE Award finalist for our first-to-market EcoTrac technology.
8
Also in 2014, MSP Industries, an AAM subsidiary based
in Oxford, Michigan, launched production of continuously
variable transmission (CVT) pulleys for Honda. As a
premier metal-formed product supplier, MSP is highly
experienced in the CVT pulley forging process. The
facility has been making CVT pulleys since 2006 and
currently supplies in excess of 3 million parts per year
to the automotive industry. The facility’s experience in
the market and its innovative processes were Honda’s
incentive to award MSP this multimillion-dollar program.
AAM Europe made great progress with the launch of
two exciting new products for Jaguar Land Rover’s next
generation of passenger car vehicles. The products
include a rear-drive unit (RDU) that launched in the fourth
quarter of 2014 at our Świdnica Manufacturing Facility,
along with three front-drive units (FDUs) that will launch
in 2015.
AAM’s market presence in China continued to grow and
diversify in 2014. For Mercedes-Benz, we will soon be
launching independent rear-drive axles for a crossover
vehicle program based off both the C-class and E-class
vehicles in China. And for FCA, we will be providing power
transfer units (PTUs) and rear drive modules (RDMs) for a
third EcoTrac derivative for the China market.
QUALITY
PERFORMANCE
Quality is one of AAM’s founding strategic principles. In 2014, AAM continued to operate at levels less than 10 discrepant parts
per million. We continue to emphasize quality, warranty, reliability and durability performance in everything that we do. AAM’s
stringent quality standards are demanded by our customers and the industry in general. We are very proud that we continue to
meet and exceed these standards year after year.
In addition to our strong quality and warranty performance, three AAM facilities: our Colfor-Malvern facility in Ohio, our
Changshu facility in China, and our DieTronik operations in Auburn Hills, Michigan, were all recognized with the GM Supplier
Quality Excellence Award for their outstanding performance. AAM’s commitment to the highest level of quality performance in
the industry is a critical differentiator in the marketplace and something that is valued by our customers.
9
TECHNOLOGY
LEADERSHIP
As the automotive industry continues to innovate
and evolve, AAM is working to develop new forward-
thinking technologies encompassing independent drive,
hybrid and electric vehicles. To meet these challenges, AAM
plans to substantially increase its investment in advanced product,
process and systems technology. That’s why, in 2014, AAM invested
approximately $104 million in research and development.
In 2014, we announced our continued commitment to technology leadership with
plans to open a new Advanced Technology Development Center (ATDC) in Detroit,
Michigan. AAM will invest $15 to $20 million in this facility, which is expected to open in 2015
and create up to 100 jobs in the City of Detroit.
The objective of the ATDC is to combine advanced product, process and systems development into a
single consolidated “innovation” setting. The ATDC will enable us to expand our benchmarking capabilities
and accelerate the development of critical competencies needed to successfully address the dominant
industry trends affecting future driveline systems. These include:
•
Improved Efficiency
• Mass Reduction
• Enhanced Vehicle Performance
10
OUTLOOK
FOR 2015
AND BEYOND
Building on the solid success of 2014, we expect our $825 million new and
incremental business backlog for 2015 to 2017 will continue to support our
plan to sustain solid profitability and improved cash flow performance. We
also expect to have measurable progress on business diversification, with
non-GM sales expected to grow faster than our total sales growth.
In 2015, AAM will execute 18 product and facility launches, which include:
• Rear axles for a light vehicle application in the Thailand market for Ford
• Driveline system components for a passenger car program
for Jaguar Land Rover
• Driveline system components for a global crossover vehicle
program for GM
•
Front and rear axles for a light-truck program for Nissan
We are excited for 2015 and beyond as AAM moves forward with a solid,
cost-competitive global manufacturing footprint; a diversified customer
base and product portfolio; and a new business backlog that will continue
to support our top line growth.
AAM remains focused on our business strategy of quality performance,
operational excellence and technology leadership. We believe our focus on
these three critical strategic objectives positively differentiates AAM within
the industry and will allow us to build value for all our stakeholders.
Thank you for your loyal and continued support of AAM.
Sincerely,
David C. Dauch
Chairman of the Board, President &
Chief Executive Officer
11
TECHNOLOGY:
THE POWER OF INNOVATION
EFFICIENCY
LIGHTWEIGHT
At AAM, we are passionate about technology leadership—
not just great products, but also the processes and systems
needed to consistently achieve industry-best quality,
warranty, reliability and delivery performance.
The automotive industry has changed greatly over the past
ten years and continues to be challenged by market and
regulatory conditions, such as ever-changing fuel prices
and strict CO2 emissions standards. AAM has responded to
these trends by emphasizing technology leadership through
significant investments in advanced product, process and
systems technologies.
In 2014, AAM proudly announced the creation of the Advanced
Technology Development Center (ATDC), where AAM engineers
will have cutting-edge tools at their disposal to prototype
revolutionary and evolutionary technologies into real-world
applications. The ATDC will also serve as a supplier collaboration
© General Motors
platform, providing our customers the opportunity to interact
with AAM early in their development cycles, further advancing
PERFORMANCE
AAM’s advantage of being a full system integrator. Additionally,
AAM will use the ATDC to showcase its technological vision
to both customers and the public in a hands-on environment.
This investment will allow AAM to maintain its position at the
forefront of the innovation curve when it comes to improved
efficiency, mass reduction and vehicle performance.
12
ROCHESTER
HILLS
TECHNICAL CENTER
With the dramatic expansion of AAM’s product portfolio over the past five years,
AAM has experienced a vast increase in the range and depth of its capabilities,
namely in the areas of electronic control software, actuators, wet clutch traction-
control devices, and electric drive axles, just to name a few.
AAM’s Technical Center in Rochester Hills, Michigan, has been at the center of
this technological growth and innovation. Since 1994, AAM has invested more
than $80 million in the Technical Center, creating a state-of-the-art facility that
rivals those of other Tier 1 automotive suppliers, and in certain aspects, of some
OEMs. The Technical Center is home to AAM’s most advanced prototypes and
teams of engineers who work closely together in an environment of technical
astuteness and global competitiveness.
ADVANCED
TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT TEAM
Being on the forefront of technological innovation, the Advanced Technical Development Team believes that the
best way to predict the future is to invent it. In fact, the team is developing a revolutionary way to manufacture
axles. This new technology will substantially reduce the weight of a traditional axle and it will also streamline
the manufacturing process, resulting in significant cost reductions.
This same team was also responsible for conceptualizing and introducing EcoTrac, AAM’s industry-first
disconnecting all-wheel-drive technology. The system is fully integrated into the car’s onboard computing
infrastructure and activates upon the detection of external risk factors, such as icy or slippery road conditions.
The Advanced Technical Development Team was responsible for the integration of the electrical components,
such as motors, actuators, and sensors, into the customer vehicles and holds numerous company patents in
software and advanced actuation technologies.
13
MECHATRONICS
TEAM
Current market trends indicate that the future of automotive development
is centered on mechanical designs enhanced with electrical impulsion.
This is where AAM’s Mechatronics Team has played a significant role,
developing a number of actuator-related patents. An actuator is a
sophisticated, electronically controlled “smart” device that communicates
with the vehicle’s electronic control unit through AAM patented software.
The Smart Multi Position Linear Actuator on AAM’s EcoTrac system best
illustrates this innovative technology. Actuators feature coils that generate
an electromagnetic field, when energized, and act upon an armature that
directly provides linear actuation of differential locking mechanisms. AAM’s
competencies of combining electronics with mechanical engineering have
triggered numerous research initiatives on how to increase power density
while also delivering more efficient power and torque.
NVH
Another discipline in which AAM possesses unique core competencies relates to Noise,
Vibration, and Harshness (NVH) engineering. The company’s well-proven NVH modeling
methodologies are widely recognized in the industry. AAM’s NVH team of finite element
analysis engineers works closely with customers to mitigate the risk of NVH issues early
in a vehicle’s design process. Three modern dynamometers are at this team’s disposal for
testing and development of advanced NVH designs. For instance, AAM’s new “SYLENT”
technology featured on GM’s next-generation full-size pickup trucks and SUVs represents
an industry-first liner designed to reduce an aluminum driveshaft’s tendency to amplify
noise and vibration. The result ... a quieter ride for drivers and their passengers.
14
e-AAM™
TROLLHÄTTAN
AAM’s Trollhättan Technical Center in Sweden plays a vital role in our global growth strategy.
It is the epicenter of e-AAMTM technologies, offering innovative state-of-the-art solutions to
customers worldwide.
The global demand for hybrid-electric and fully electric vehicles is on the rise, driven by:
CO2 legislation, fuel prices and tax incentives for consumers of hybrid and full-electric vehicles.
e-AAM hybrid and electric driveline systems deliver true engineering innovation to meet
that demand.
AAM’s goal is to become the forerunner in electrification solutions globally. Presently, e-AAM
offers mild hybrid, plug-in hybrid and full electric vehicle architectures. The core differentiator
of e-AAM is the unprecedented vectoring capabilities that provide maximum traction and ride
control. Torque vectoring enables the system to vary the power to each wheel and thereby
increases both lateral agility and stability. Enhanced handling of the e-AAM systems is combined
with AAM’s NVH expertise that also extends to electric-motor-driven rear drive modules.
The e-AAM team strives to establish and maintain industry leadership in eRDM NVH engineering
by focusing on three main areas:
• Development of driveline subsystem targets
• Using finite element analysis to correlate to physical test data
and conduct design optimizations
• Establishment of NVH test capabilities for eRDM systems
Currently, the team is in the exciting phase of bringing the e-AAM technology to market. Qoros
Auto Co., Ltd. (Qoros), an OEM headquartered in Shanghai, China, and a joint venture between
Chery Automobile Co. and Israel Corporation will feature e-AAM technology on a future
Qoros vehicle.
15
AAM
LEADERSHIP
OFFICERS
Michael J. Bly
President–AAM Europe
(Vice President–AAM Corporate)
David C. Dauch
Chairman, President &
Chief Executive Officer
David A. Culton
Vice President–
Material Cost Optimization
Nigel J. Francis
Vice President–Corporate Planning
Philip R. Guys
Vice President–
Product Engineering & Development
Donald L. Joseph
President–AAM Asia
(Vice President–AAM Corporate)
Terri M. Kemp
Vice President–Human Resources
Michael J. Lynch
Vice President–Finance & Controller
Allan R. Monich
Vice President–
Quality, Warranty & Customer
Satisfaction
John R. Morrison
President–AAM North America
(Vice President–AAM Corporate)
John S. Sofia
Vice President–
Global Program Management
Thomas J. Szymanski
Vice President–
Driveline Manufacturing Services
Norman Willemse
Vice President–
Metal Formed Products Business Unit
Michael K. Simonte
Executive Vice President
& Chief Financial Officer
Alberto L. Satine
Senior Vice President–
Global Driveline Operations
Terry J. Woychowski
Senior Vice President–
Advanced Engineering & Quality
Mark S. Barrett
Group Vice President–
Program Management,
Material Cost Optimization,
Procurement & Driveshaft
Business Unit
Steven J. Proctor
Group Vice President–
Strategic & Business
Development
16
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
David C. Dauch 1,6
Chairman, President &
Chief Executive Officer
Elizabeth A. Chappell 3, 4
President & Chief Executive Officer
Detroit Economic Club
Forest J. Farmer 1
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer & President The Farmer Group
Steven B. Hantler 3
Director of Policy Initiatives for
The Marcus Family Group
Richard C. Lappin 4, 5, 6
Executive Chairman
VOKAL Interactive
James A. McCaslin 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Retired President & Chief Operating Officer
Harley-Davidson Motor Company
William P. Miller II 2, 4, 5
Head of Asset Allocation
Saudi Arabian Investment Company
John F. Smith 2, 5, 6
Principal of Eagle Advisors LLC Retired
Group Vice President General Motors
Samuel Valenti III 1, 2, 3, 6
Chairman of the Board TriMas Corporation
and Chairman & Chief Executive Officer,
Valenti Capital and World Capital Partners
Thomas K. Walker 1
Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive
Officer Lackawanna Acquisition Corporation
Board Committee Assignments
1 Executive Committee
2 Audit Committee
3 Compensation Committee
4 Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
5 Technology Committee
6 Strategy Committee
STOCKHOLDER
INFORMATION
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
One Dauch Drive
Detroit, Michigan 48211-1198
Telephone: (313) 758-2000
Internet: www.aam.com
Corporate News Releases
Corporate news releases are available on our website
at www.aam.com.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on
April 30, 2015, at 8:00 a.m. EST at:
AAM World Headquarters
One Dauch Drive
Detroit, Michigan 48211-1198
Form 10-K Annual Report
AAM’s Form 10-K Annual Report for 2014, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, is available on our website or from:
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
Investor Relations
One Dauch Drive
Detroit, Michigan 48211-1198
Telephone: (313) 758-4823
Equity Securities
Inquiries related to shareholder records; change of name, address,
or ownership of stock; and lost or stolen stock certificates should be
directed to the transfer agent and registrar.
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43069
Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3069
Telephone: (877) 282-1168
Internet: www.computershare.com
Stock Listing
The New York Stock Exchange is the principal market for AAM
common stock. Ticker Symbol: AXL
Stockholders
As of March 3, 2015, there were 314 stockholders of record.
Stock Performance
Comparison of cumulative total return of AAM with the cumulative
total return of our competitor peer group (Autoliv Inc., BorgWarner
Inc., Dana Corporation, Lear Corporation, Magna International Inc.,
Meritor Inc., Tenneco Automotive Inc. and Visteon Corporation)
and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index assuming $100
invested on December 31, 2009, through December 31, 2014. The
closing price of AXL as of December 31, 2014, was $22.59.
COMPARISON OF 5 -YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, the S&P 500 Index,
SIC Code 3714 - Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories and Peer Group
$350
$300
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
12/09
12/10
12/11
12/12
12/13
12/14
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings
S&P 500
SIC Code 3714 - Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Peer Group
*$100 invested on 12/31/09 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.
Copyright© 2015 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
17
Graph produced by Research Data Group, Inc.
2/17/2015
NORTH AMERICA
World Headquarters, Detroit, Michigan
AccuGear, Inc., Fort Wayne, Indiana
AccuGear-Silao, Silao, Mexico
Colfor Manufacturing, Inc., Malvern, Ohio
Colfor Manufacturing, Inc., Minerva, Ohio
DieTronik, Auburn Hills, Michigan
Guanajuato Forge, Guanajuato, Mexico
Guanajuato Manufacturing Complex, Guanajuato, Mexico
Lancaster Manufacturing Facility, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
MSP Industries, Oxford, Michigan
Oxford Forge, Oxford, Michigan
Quality Engineering Technical Center, Auburn Hills, Michigan
Rochester Manufacturing Facility, Rochester, Indiana
Silao Manufacturing Facility, Silao, Mexico
Technical Center, Rochester Hills, Michigan
Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility, Three Rivers, Michigan
SOUTH AMERICA
Araucária Manufacturing Facility, Araucária, Brazil
EUROPE
AAM Winter Test Center, Arjeplog, Sweden
Trollhättan Technical Center, Trollhättan, Sweden
Europe Headquarters & Engineering Center, Bad Homburg, Germany
Luxembourg Business Office, Luxembourg
Glasgow Manufacturing Facility, Glasgow, Scotland
Świdnica Manufacturing Facility, Świdnica, Poland
ASIA
Asia Headquarters & Engineering Center, Shanghai, China
Changshu Manufacturing Facility, Changshu, China
Hefei - AAM I & II Manufacturing Facilities, Hefei, China
Rayong Manufacturing Facility, Rayong, Thailand
Seoul Business Office & Engineering Center, Seoul, South Korea
Tokyo Business Office, Tokyo, Japan
INDIA
Chennai Manufacturing Facility, Chennai, India
Pantnagar Manufacturing Facility, Pantnagar, India
Pune Business Office & Engineering Center, Pune, India
Pune Engineering & Development Center, Pune, India
Pune Manufacturing Facility, Pune, India
18
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
or
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission file number 1-14303
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
ONE DAUCH DRIVE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN
(Address of principal executive offices)
38-3161171
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
48211-1198
(Zip Code)
313-758-2000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE
PREFERRED SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE
Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of
“accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
(Do not check if small reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
No
The closing price of the Common Stock on June 30, 2014 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange was $18.89 per share and the aggregate market value of the
registrant's Common Stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $1,426.1 million.
As of February 19, 2015, the number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding was 75,761,739 shares.
Portions of the registrant's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2014 and Proxy Statement for use in connection with its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on April 30, 2015, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after
December 31, 2014, are incorporated by reference in Part I (Items 1, 1A, 1B, 2, 3 and 4), Part II (Items 5, 6, 7, 7A, 8, 9, 9A and 9B), Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and
14) and Part IV (Item 15) of this Report.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS - ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 2014
Part I
Item 1
Business
Item 1A Risk Factors
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2
Properties
Item 3
Legal Proceedings
Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures
Part II
Item 5 Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6
Selected Financial Data
Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Item 9A Controls and Procedures
Item 9B Other Information
Part III
Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11 Executive Compensation
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
Item 14 Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Part IV
Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Page
Number
2
13
18
19
20
20
20
21
22
37
38
81
81
82
83
83
83
83
83
84
1
Item 1.
Business
Part I
As used in this report, except as otherwise indicated in information incorporated by reference, references to
“our Company,” "we," "our," "us" or “AAM” mean American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) and its
subsidiaries and predecessors, collectively.
(a) General Development of Business
Holdings, a Delaware corporation, is a successor to American Axle & Manufacturing of Michigan, Inc., a
Michigan corporation, pursuant to a migratory merger between these entities in 1999.
(b) Financial Information About Segments
See Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 11 - Segment and Geographic Information”
included in this report.
(c) Narrative Description of Business
Company Overview
We are a Tier I supplier to the automotive industry. We manufacture, engineer, design and validate driveline
and drivetrain systems and related components and chassis modules for light trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUVs),
passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles. Driveline and drivetrain systems include components
that transfer power from the transmission and deliver it to the drive wheels. Our driveline, drivetrain and related
products include axles, driveheads, chassis modules, driveshafts, power transfer units, transfer cases, chassis and
steering components, transmission parts, electric drive systems and metal-formed products. In addition to locations
in the United States (U.S.) (Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania), we also have offices or facilities in Brazil,
China, Germany, India, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Poland, Scotland, South Korea, Sweden and Thailand.
We are the principal supplier of driveline components to General Motors Company (GM) for its full-size rear-
wheel drive (RWD) light trucks and SUVs manufactured in North America, supplying substantially all of GM's rear
axle and four-wheel drive and all-wheel drive (4WD/AWD) axle requirements for these vehicle platforms. Sales to
GM were approximately 68% of our consolidated net sales in 2014, 71% in 2013, and 73% in 2012.
We are the sole-source supplier to GM for certain axles and other driveline products for the life of each GM
vehicle program covered by Lifetime Program Contracts and Long Term Program Contracts (collectively, LPCs).
Substantially all of our sales to GM are made pursuant to the LPCs. The LPCs have terms equal to the lives of the
relevant vehicle programs or their respective derivatives, which typically run 5 to 7 years, and require us to remain
competitive with respect to technology, design and quality.
We also supply driveline system products to FCA US LLC, formerly known as Chrysler Group LLC (Chrysler),
for heavy-duty Ram full-size pickup trucks and its derivatives, as well as the AWD Jeep Cherokee and the AWD
Chrysler 200. Sales to Chrysler were approximately 18% of our consolidated net sales in 2014, 12% in 2013 and
10% in 2012. In addition to GM and Chrysler, we supply driveline systems and other related components to
Volkswagen AG (Volkswagen), Audi AG (Audi), Mack Trucks Inc. (Mack Truck), Harley-Davidson Inc., Nissan Motor
Co., Ltd. (Nissan), PACCAR Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Jaguar Land Rover Limited (JLR), Daimler Truck, Deere &
Company, Ford Motor Company (Ford) and other original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and Tier I supplier
companies such as Jatco Ltd. and Hino Motors Ltd. Our consolidated net sales to customers other than GM
increased 29% to $1,199.9 million in 2014 as compared to $926.7 million in 2013 and $792.6 million in 2012.
We estimate our principal served market to be approximately $36 billion based on information available at the
end of 2014. Our principal served market is the driveline market, which consists of driveline, drivetrain and related
components and chassis modules for light trucks, SUVs, passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial
vehicles, in the regions in which we compete.
2
The following chart sets forth the percentage of total revenues attributable to our products for the periods
indicated:
Year ended December 31,
2013
2012
2014
Axles and driveshafts ........................................................................
Drivetrain components, forged products and other ............................
Total ..............................................................................................
82%
18%
100%
82%
18%
100%
82%
18%
100%
Business Strategy
We are focused on profitable net sales growth and strengthening our balance sheet by capitalizing on our
competitive strengths and continuing to diversify our customer, product and geographic sales mix while providing
exceptional value to our customers. Over the past several years, we have taken necessary actions that allowed us
to make significant, sustainable structural cost reductions which have enabled us to be market cost competitive on
a global basis.
We have aligned our business strategy to build value for our key stakeholders. This strategy emphasizes a
commitment to deliver industry leading quality, technology leadership and operational excellence. By focusing on
this commitment, we can achieve our key critical business objectives of product and customer diversification,
globalization and solid financial performance. This strategy includes the following actions:
Maintain our high quality standards which are the foundation of our product durability and reliability.
• AAM has an outstanding daily track record for delivering quality products, having averaged less than 10
discrepant parts per million (PPM) since 2003, as measured by our largest customer.
• Our quality performance has resulted in improved warranty performance for our customers. As a result,
the cost per vehicle has improved an average of approximately 10% annually since 2006, as measured
by our largest customer.
• During 2014, our Colfor Minerva Facility in Ohio, Dietronik location in Michigan and Changshu
Manufacturing Facility in China were recognized with the GM Supplier Quality Excellence Award for
outstanding performance.
Achieve technology leadership by delivering innovative driveline products which improve the diversification of
our product portfolio while increasing our total global served market.
• AAM's significant investment in research and development (R&D) has resulted in the development of
advanced technology products designed to assist our customers in meeting the market demands for
improved fuel-efficiency; lower emissions; enhanced power density; advanced, sophisticated electronic
controls; improved safety, ride and handling performance; and enhanced reliability and durability for light
trucks, SUVs, passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles.
• AAM has established a high efficiency product portfolio that is designed to improve axle efficiency and
fuel economy through innovative product design technologies. As our customers look to reduce weight
through the use of aluminum and other conventional means, AAM is well positioned to offer innovative,
industry leading solutions for lightweighting. Our portfolio includes high efficiency axles, aluminum axles
and also AWD applications for plug-in hybrid electrical vehicles to full-electric vehicles.
3
• AAM's EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system is a fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly driveline
system that provides OEMs the option of an all-wheel-drive system that disconnects when not needed to
improve fuel efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions compared to conventional AWD systems. AAM's
EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system is featured on the AWD Jeep Cherokee, which was named by
Motor Week as its 2014 Best Small Utility Vehicle, and the AWD Chrysler 200. We are currently
designing the next generation of our EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system which is smaller, lighter in
weight and aims to recover up to 90% of fuel penalty, compared to 80% currently.
•
e-AAM Driveline Systems AB (e-AAM) was created to design and commercialize electric and hybrid
driveline systems designed to improve fuel efficiency, reduce CO2 emissions and provide AWD capability.
We will continue engineering, developing and commercializing electric and hybrid driveline systems for
passenger cars and crossover vehicles. In 2013, we secured a new driveline systems contract featuring
patented e-AAMTM hybrid & electric driveline systems technology with Qoros Auto Co., Ltd. in China.
• AAM continues to invest in R&D in emerging technology such as torque biasing capability. AAM has
developed capabilities in the areas of control systems and mechatronics to further integrate electronic
components such as motors, actuators, and sensors into AAM's mechanical technology to enhance
vehicle performance and provide superior torque management.
• To accelerate AAM's technological advancements, we announced in 2014 our plan to construct an
Advanced Technology Development Center (ATDC) at our Detroit Campus. With a $15 to $20 million
investment and the estimated creation of 75 to 100 jobs, we plan to open the state-of-the-art center for
technology benchmarking, prototype development, advanced technology development, supplier
collaboration, customer showcasing and associate training on our future products, processes, and
systems by mid-2015.
Sustain our operational excellence and focus on cost management to deliver exceptional value to our
customers.
• Our top priority for 2014 has been to flawlessly launch 16 critical programs for our customers. These
launches included GM's next generation Heavy Duty pickups and SUVs (K2XX Program).
• Our focus on cost management has led to sustainable structural reductions in AAM's fixed cost structure.
We continue to focus on cost management through the implementation of the AAM Manufacturing
System to improve quality, eliminate waste, and reduce lead time and total costs globally.
• Our stand alone United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW)
agreement, that covers hourly associates at our Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility, ensures market
competitiveness at AAM's largest U.S. facility into 2017. The collective bargaining agreements that cover
our hourly associates at our MSP Industries Corporation and Colfor Manufacturing Inc. subsidiaries
expire in 2017 and 2018, respectively.
• With the closure of our Detroit Manufacturing Complex (DMC) and Cheektowaga Manufacturing Facility
(CKMF) in 2012, we have achieved market competitive labor cost structures at each of our global
locations.
Diversify our business through the growth of new and existing customer relationships and expansion of our
product portfolio.
•
In addition to maintaining and building upon our longstanding relationships with GM and Chrysler, we
have focused on generating profitable growth with new and existing global OEM customers. New
business launches in 2014 and 2015 include business with key international customers such as Ford,
Honda, Jaguar Land Rover, Nissan, Mercedes-Benz and others.
4
• We have accelerated the development and launch of products for passenger cars and crossover vehicles
and the global light truck and commercial vehicle markets. We have approximately $825 million of new
and incremental business backlog launching from 2015 to 2017, of which approximately 80% relates to
AWD and RWD applications for passenger cars, crossover vehicles and driveline applications for the
commercial vehicle market.
• Approximately 70% of our new and incremental business backlog launching from 2015 to 2017 is for
customers other than GM. In addition, we have over $1 billion in quoted and emerging new business
opportunities. These opportunities would allow us to continue the diversification and expansion of our
customer base, product portfolio and global footprint. Substantially all of these opportunities are for
customers other than GM.
• We also continue to evaluate and consider strategic growth investments to accelerate the profitable
growth and diversification of our business.
Achieve globalization by increasing our presence in global markets to support our customers' platforms.
• As our customers continue to design their products for global markets, they will continue to require global
support from their suppliers. For this reason, it is critical that we maintain a global presence in these
markets in order to remain competitive for new contracts. Over the past few years, we have significantly
increased our installed capacity in cost competitive global markets to support current programs and future
opportunities. Specific actions included expanding capacity in Brazil, China, Mexico, Poland, Thailand
and the U.S. and new facilities in Mexico and the U.S.
• Our joint venture (JV) with Hefei Automobile Axle Co., Ltd. (HAAC), a subsidiary of the JAC Group (Anhui
Jianghuai Automotive Group Co., Ltd.), which includes 100% of HAAC's light commercial axle business,
continues to be a strong advantage for building relationships with leading Chinese light truck
manufacturers. We supply front and rear beam axles to several leading Chinese light truck
manufacturers, including JAC and BAIC Foton, making AAM the second largest axle supplier in China's
light commercial truck segment.
• Approximately 60% of our $825 million of new and incremental business backlog launching from 2015 to
2017 is for end use markets outside the U.S. and approximately 85% has been sourced to our
manufacturing facilities outside the U.S.
Achieve solid financial performance to build value for our key stakeholders.
• Over the past five years, AAM's compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for sales has exceeded the
growth rate of the industry. We expect AAM's new and incremental business backlog will continue to
drive our sales to grow at a rate that is higher than the industry through 2017, based on current industry
estimates.
• We have established a cost competitive, operationally flexible global manufacturing, engineering and
sourcing footprint to increase our presence in global growth markets, support global product development
initiatives and establish regional cost competitiveness. This includes having manufacturing and
engineering facilities in Brazil, China, Germany, India, Mexico, Poland, Sweden, Thailand and the U.S.
•
In 2013, we successfully closed on over $1.25 billion in new and amended financing agreements. As a
result, we reduced our weighted average interest cost, extended our debt maturities and improved debt
covenant terms and conditions. By taking advantage of favorable market conditions, we improved our
flexibility to manage and grow our business and to support AAM's long-term strategic objectives. As of
December 31, 2014, we had over $800 million in available liquidity and no significant debt maturities until
2018.
5
Competition and Strengths
We compete with a variety of independent suppliers and distributors, as well as with the in-house operations of
certain OEMs. Our principal competitors include Dana Holding Corporation, GKN plc, Magna International Inc., ZF
Friedrichshafen AG, Linamar Corporation, Meritor Inc. and the in-house operations of various global OEMs. The
sector is also attracting new competitors, some of whom are entering our product segment through the acquisition
of non-core OEM operations.
With a focus on engineering and manufacturing, we support our business strategy and differentiate ourselves
through outstanding long-term daily track records on quality, warranty, reliability, delivery and launch performance.
We reduced our discrepant PPM performance, as measured by our largest customer, from 13,441 PPM in 1994 to
an average of less than 10 PPM for each of the last 10 years.
As global OEM’s race to meet tighter fuel efficiency emissions standards, the automotive industry is entering a
new, more advanced phase of innovation and design. This encompasses independent drive vehicles, hybrid and
electric vehicles, advanced powertrain applications and other equally sophisticated technologies. AAM is meeting
these challenges with an aggressive plan to increase our investment in advanced product, process and systems
technology.
All of our global facilities utilize the AAM Manufacturing System, a business philosophy focused on lean
manufacturing designed to facilitate cost reductions, improve quality, reduce inventory and improve our operating
flexibility. This philosophy is demonstrated through the following:
•
In the past, our largest two facilities, Guanajuato Manufacturing Complex and Three Rivers
Manufacturing Facility, were recognized for outstanding performance as a "Shingo Prize" recipient and by
being named by IndustryWeek Magazine as one of the 10 best plants in North America, respectively.
Industry Trends
See Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis - Industry Trends.”
Productive Materials
We believe that we have adequate sources of supply of productive materials and components for our
manufacturing needs. Most raw materials (such as steel) and semi-processed or finished items (such as castings)
are available within the geographical regions of our operating facilities from qualified sources in quantities sufficient
for our needs. We currently have contracts with our steel suppliers that ensure continuity of supply to our principal
operating facilities in North America. We also have validation and testing capabilities that enable us to strategically
qualify steel sources on a global basis. As we continue to expand our global manufacturing footprint, we will rely on
suppliers in local markets that have not yet proven their ability to meet our requirements.
Research and Development (R&D)
We continue to invest in the development of new products, processes and systems to improve efficiency and
flexibility in our operations and continue to deliver innovative new products, chassis modules and integrated
driveline systems to our customers.
In 2014, R&D spending, net of customer engineering, design and development recoveries, was $103.9 million
as compared to $103.4 million in 2013 and $123.4 million in 2012. The focus of this investment continues to be
developing innovative driveline and drivetrain systems and related components for light trucks, passenger cars,
SUVs, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles in the global marketplace. Product development in this area
includes power transfer units, transfer cases, driveline and transmission differentials, multi-piece driveshafts,
constant velocity joints, torque transfer devices, chassis modules and front and rear drive axles. We continue to
focus on electronic integration in our existing and future products to advance their performance. We also continue
to support the development of hybrid and electric vehicle systems. Special emphasis is also placed on the
development of products and systems that provide our customers with advancements in fuel efficiency and
emissions reduction and improved performance metrics such as noise vibration harshness (NVH) and power
6
density. Our efforts in these areas have resulted in the development of prototypes and various configurations of
these driveline systems for several OEMs throughout the world.
We have also developed and commercialized a disconnecting AWD system, which strengthens AAM's position
as a leader in global driveline systems technology. AAM's EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system is an industry-first
technology that seamlessly engages AWD functionality while improving fuel efficiency and reducing CO2 emissions.
This system is now featured on the award-winning Jeep Cherokee and the Chrysler 200.
AAM also develops and manufactures high-efficiency axle systems through the use of proprietary technologies
to optimize product design and lubrication management, while also significantly reducing friction and improving fuel
economy. In 2012, AAM launched a high efficiency axle on the Cadillac ATS compact luxury sport sedan and in
2014 we launched our high efficiency rear-drive modules on the Cadillac CTS, Motor Trend's 2014 Car of the Year.
Our e-AAM subsidiary engineers and develops electric and hybrid driveline systems to be commercialized for
passenger cars and crossover vehicles. These systems are designed to improve fuel efficiency by up to 30%,
reduce CO2 emissions and provide AWD capability with the additional benefit of improved vehicle stability when
compared to traditional mechanical AWD systems.
Through the development of our EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system, our high efficiency axles and our e-
AAM hybrid and electric driveline systems, we have significantly advanced our efforts to improve fuel efficiency and
ride and handling performance while reducing emissions.
As our customers move toward ways to reduce vehicle weight through the use of aluminum or other
conventional means, AAM is well positioned to offer innovative, industry leading solutions, through proprietary
technologies such as PowerLite® axles, PowerDense® gears and PowerFilm® lubricant for passenger car, light truck
and AWD applications.
Backlog
We typically enter into agreements with our customers to provide axles or other driveline or drivetrain products
for the life of our customers' vehicle programs. Our new and incremental business includes awarded programs and
incremental content and volume including customer requested engineering changes. Our backlog may be impacted
by various assumptions, many of which are provided by our customers based on their long range production plans.
These assumptions include future production volume estimates, changes in program launch timing and fluctuation
in foreign currency exchange rates.
Our new and incremental business backlog is approximately $825 million for programs launching from 2015 to
2017. Approximately 80% of our new and incremental business backlog relates to RWD and AWD applications for
passenger cars, crossover vehicles and driveline applications for the commercial vehicle markets. Approximately
60% of our new and incremental business backlog will be for end use markets outside the U.S. and approximately
85% has been sourced to our non-U.S. manufacturing facilities. Approximately 70% of our new and incremental
business backlog is for customers other than GM.
Patents and Trademarks
We maintain and have pending various U.S. and foreign patents, trademarks and other rights to intellectual
property relating to our business, which we believe are appropriate to protect our interest in existing products, new
inventions, manufacturing processes and product developments. We do not believe that any single patent or
trademark is material to our business nor would expiration or invalidity of any patent or trademark have a material
adverse effect on our business or our ability to compete.
Cyclicality and Seasonality
Our operations are cyclical because they are directly related to worldwide automotive production, which is itself
cyclical and dependent on general economic conditions and other factors. Our business is also moderately
seasonal as our major OEM customers historically have an extended shutdown of operations (typically 1 to 2
weeks) in conjunction with their model year changeover and an approximate one-week shutdown in December.
Accordingly, our quarterly results may reflect these trends.
7
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental and occupational safety and health
laws, regulations and ordinances, including those regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management
and environmental cleanup. We closely monitor our environmental conditions to ensure that we are in compliance
with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. We have made, and will continue to make, capital and other
expenditures to comply with environmental requirements, including recurring administrative costs. Such
expenditures were not significant in 2014, 2013 and 2012.
Associates
We employ approximately 12,820 associates on a global basis, including our joint venture affiliates, of which
approximately 3,810 are employed in the U.S. Approximately 2,300 associates are represented by the UAW.
Approximately 1,570 of our hourly associates at our Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility in Michigan are subject to
a stand alone UAW agreement that expires September 13, 2017. An additional 730 associates at our MSP
Industries Corporation and Colfor Manufacturing, Inc. subsidiaries are represented by the UAW under collective
bargaining agreements that expire April 18, 2017 and June 8, 2018, respectively. In addition, approximately 110
associates at our Albion Automotive subsidiary in Scotland, approximately 3,475 associates at our Guanajuato
Manufacturing Complex in Mexico and approximately 570 associates at our Araucaria Manufacturing Facility in
Brazil are represented by labor unions that are subject to collective bargaining agreements. The current collective
bargaining agreement at Albion will expire on March 31, 2017. The collective bargaining agreements in Mexico and
Brazil expire annually.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Name
Age
Position
David C. Dauch .........................................
Michael K. Simonte ...................................
Alberto L. Satine .......................................
Terry J. Woychowski..................................
Mark S. Barrett ..........................................
Steven J. Proctor ......................................
Michael J. Bly ............................................
David A. Culton .........................................
Nigel J. Francis ........................................
Philip R. Guys ..........................................
Donald L. Joseph......................................
Terri M. Kemp ...........................................
Michael J. Lynch .......................................
Allan R. Monich .........................................
Jon R. Morrison .........................................
John S. Sofia ............................................
Thomas J. Szymanski ...............................
Norman Willemse .....................................
50
51
58
59
54
58
47
49
54
52
59
49
51
61
56
55
53
58
Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Senior Vice President - Global Driveline Operations
Senior Vice President - Advanced Engineering & Quality
Group Vice President - Program Management, Material Cost
Optimization, Procurement and Driveshaft Business Unit
Group Vice President - Strategic & Business Development
President - AAM Europe, Vice President - AAM Corporate
Vice President - Material Cost Optimization
Vice President - Corporate Planning
Vice President - Product Engineering & Development
President - AAM Asia, Vice President - AAM Corporate
Vice President - Human Resources
Vice President - Finance & Controller
Vice President - Quality, Warranty & Customer Satisfaction
President - AAM North America, Vice President - AAM Corporate
Vice President - Global Program Management
Vice President - Driveline Manufacturing Services
Vice President - Metal Formed Products Business Unit
8
David C. Dauch, age 50, has been Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer since
September 2013 and has served on AAM's Board of Directors since April 2009. Prior to that, he served as President
and Chief Executive Officer (since September 2012), President & Chief Operating Officer (since June 2008),
Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer (since December 2007); Executive Vice President - Commercial
& Strategic Development (since January 2005); Senior Vice President, Commercial (since May 2004); Senior Vice
President, Sales, Marketing & Driveline Division (since September 2003); Vice President, Manufacturing - Driveline
Division (since January 2001); Vice President, Sales and Marketing (since 1998) and Director of Sales, GM Full-
Size Truck Programs (since May 1996). Mr. Dauch joined our Company in July 1995 as Manager, Sales
Administration. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Dauch held various positions and served on the Board of
Directors at Collins & Aikman Products Company. Presently, he serves on the Boards of Directors of Business
Leaders for Michigan, the Detroit Regional Chamber, the Great Lakes Council Boy Scouts of America, the Boys &
Girls Clubs of Southeastern Michigan, the Original Equipment Suppliers Association and Amerisure Mutual
Holdings, Inc. Mr. Dauch also serves on the Miami University Business Advisory Council.
Michael K. Simonte, age 51, has been Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer since December
2011. Simonte previously served as Executive Vice President - Finance & Chief Financial Officer (since February
2009), Group Vice President - Finance & Chief Financial Officer (since December 2007); Vice President - Finance &
Chief Financial Officer (since January 2006); Vice President & Treasurer (since May 2004); and Treasurer (since
September 2002). Simonte joined AAM in December 1998 as Director, Corporate Finance. Prior to joining our
Company, Simonte served as Senior Manager at the Detroit office of Ernst & Young LLP. Simonte is a certified
public accountant.
Alberto L. Satine, age 58, has been Senior Vice President - Global Driveline Operations since January 2014.
Prior to that, he served as Group Vice President - Global Sales & Business Development (since December 2011),
Vice President - Strategic & Business Development (since November 2005), Vice President - Procurement (since
January 2005); Executive Director, Global Procurement Direct Materials (since January 2004); General Manager,
Latin American Driveline Sales and Operations (since August 2003) and General Manager of International
Operations (since joining our Company in May 2001). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Satine held several
management positions at Dana Corporation, including the position of President of Dana's Andean Operations in
South America from 1997 to 2000 and General Manager of the Spicer Transmission Division in Toledo, Ohio from
1994 to 1997.
Terry J. Woychowski, age 59 , has been Senior Vice President - Advanced Engineering & Quality since
February 2013. Prior to joining AAM, Mr. Woychowski spent more than 30 years with General Motors, where he
held numerous senior management positions including Vice President, Global Quality & Vehicle Launches, Vice
President, Global Vehicle Program Management and Global Chief Engineer Full-size Trucks & Executive Director.
Mark S. Barrett, age 54, has been Group Vice President - Program Management, Material Cost Optimization,
Procurement and Driveshaft Business Unit since November 2014. Prior to that, he served as Group Vice President
- Procurement, Program Management and Driveshaft Business Unit (since August 2013), Group Vice President -
Procurement and Program Management (since February 2013), Group Vice President - Engineering & Procurement
(since November 2012), Group Vice President - Engineering, Product Development & Procurement (since
December 2011), Vice President - Engineering & Product Development (since October 2008), Executive Director,
Engineering & Product Development (since January 2008); Executive Director, Axle & Drivetrain (since November
2006); Executive Director, Powertrain, Driveshaft and Halfshaft Engineering (since January 2006); Executive
Director, Released and Domestic Programs (since January 2004); Director, Mid Size Axle Programs (since
December 1998) and Staff Project Engineer (since joining our Company in March 1994). Prior to joining our
Company, Mr. Barrett served at General Motors for nine years in a variety of manufacturing and engineering
positions.
Steven J. Proctor, age 58, has been Group Vice President - Strategic & Business Development since
December 2014. Prior to that, he served as Group Vice President - Global Sales and Business Development (since
January 2014); President - AAM Europe, Vice President - AAM Corporate (since June 2012), President - AAM Asia,
Vice President - AAM Corporate (since October 2008); Vice President - Sales & Marketing (since June 2004);
Executive Director, Driveline Sales & Marketing (since September 2003); President and Chief Operating Officer of
AAM do Brasil (since September 1999); Director, GMT-360, I-10/GMT-355 (since December 1998); Director,
Worldwide Programs (since February 1998); Director, Strategic Planning (since July 1996) and Director, General
Motors Programs (since joining our Company in March 1994). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Proctor worked for
9
General Motors for 20 years in the areas of product and industrial engineering, production, material management
and sales.
Michael J. Bly, age 47, has been President - AAM Europe, Vice President - AAM Corporate since joining our
Company in January 2014. Prior to joining AAM, he spent more than 27 years with General Motors in a variety of
management roles in the areas of powertrain, engineering and electrification. Mr. Bly's position prior to leaving
General Motors was Vice President of European Powertrain Engineering.
David A. Culton, age 49, has been Vice President - Material Cost Optimization since January 2014. Prior to
that, he served as President - AAM Americas, Vice President - AAM Corporate (since June 2012), President - AAM
Europe, Vice President - AAM Corporate (since November 2010), Vice President - Commercial (since September
2009); Vice President - Unibody Vehicle Business Unit (since October 2008); Controller (since April 2007);
Executive Director, Sales (since July 2006); Director, Commercial Analysis (since August 2004); Director, Finance -
Operations (Since June 2003); Finance Manager (since August 1999); and Assistant Finance Manager (since
joining our Company in September 1998). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Culton served at Chrysler Corporation
for 10 years in a variety of management, finance, engineering and manufacturing positions.
Nigel J. Francis, age 54, has been Vice President - Corporate Planning since joining our Company in
November 2014. Prior to joining AAM, Mr. Francis has nearly 30 years of experience in the global automotive
sector having held executive level positions at OEM and Tier I companies in North America and Europe including,
Senior Vice President Automotive Office State of Michigan and Senior Adviser to the Governor of Michigan, Chief
Engineering and Program Management - Tata Technologies, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer -
Trexa LLC, Executive Vice President - Bright Automotive; and Vice President of Vehicle Engineering - Mercedes-
Benz Technology. Mr. Francis has spent the majority of his career in advanced design and engineering product
development and in recent years has been closely involved with clean technology through hybrid and electric
vehicle development and strategic planning in the global automotive sector.
Philip R. Guys, age 52, has been Vice President - Product Engineering & Development since November 2012.
Prior to that, he served as Vice President - Product Engineering since joining AAM in December 2011. Prior to
joining our Company, Mr. Guys served for four years at Linamar Corporation in various senior management
positions, including Vice President - Engineering, and over 20 years in various engineering positions of increasing
responsibility at Ford Motor Company and General Motors.
Donald L. Joseph, age 59, has been President - AAM Asia, Vice President - AAM Corporate since January
2015. Mr. Joseph joined AAM in 1994 as a Manufacturing Manager at AAM's Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility.
Since then, he has served in various manufacturing and management positions with increasing responsibility
throughout AAM's global operations, including his most recent position of Managing Director - AAM Asia. Mr.
Joseph's professional career began with General Motors in 1977. While at General Motors, Mr. Joseph served in a
variety of positions with increasing responsibility at the Hydra-matic and Saginaw Divisions. He also spent time at
the NUMMI facility studying lean manufacturing.
Terri M. Kemp, age 49, has been Vice President - Human Resources since September 2012. Prior to that, she
served as Executive Director - Human Resources & Labor Relations (since November 2010); Executive Director -
Human Resources (since September 2009); Director - Human Resources Operations (since October 2008);
Director - Program Management (since March 2008); Director - Program Management, Mexico (since August 2006);
Launch Manager (since May 2006); Manager - Manufacturing (since August 2005); Manager - Manufacturing, Front
Axles and Gears (since June 2005); Area Manager - Plant 1 (since October 2004); Director - Personnel, Detroit
Gear & Axle (since January 2003); Area Manager - Plant 6 (since March 2002); Manager - Program Management
(since February 2001); Area Manager - Manufacturing Plant 8 (since June 1999); Supervisor - I.E. Plants 1, 6 and 8
(since August 1998); Production Coordinator (since September 1997); and Manager - Productivity since joining the
Company in July 1996. Prior to joining our Company, Mrs. Kemp served for nine years at Corning Incorporated,
where she progressed through a series of manufacturing positions with increasing responsibility, including Industrial
Engineer, Department Head and Operations Manager.
10
Michael J. Lynch, age 51, has been Vice President - Finance & Controller since September 2012. Prior to that,
he served as Executive Director & Controller (since October 2008); Director - Commercial Analysis (since July
2006); Director - Finance, Driveline Americas (since March 2006); Director - Investment & Commercial Analysis
(since November 2005); Director - Finance, Driveline (since October 2005); Director - Finance Operations, U.S.
(since April 2005); Manager - Finance (since June 2003); Manager - Finance, Forge Division (since September
2001); Finance Manager - Albion Automotive (since October 1998); Supervisor - Cost Estimating (since February
1998) and Financial Analyst at the Detroit Manufacturing Facility since joining AAM in September 1996. Prior to
joining our Company, Mr. Lynch served at Stellar Engineering for nine years in various capacities.
Allan R. Monich, age 61, has been Vice President - Quality, Warranty & Customer Satisfaction since
November 2010. Prior to that, he served as Executive Director - Warranty (since January 2010); Vice President -
Quality Assurance & Customer Satisfaction (since July 2006); Vice President - Program Management & Capital
Planning (since October 2005); Vice President - Program Management & Launch (since May 2004); Vice President,
Manufacturing Forging Division (since October 2001); Vice President, Human Resources (since 1998); Vice
President, Personnel (since November 1997) and Plant Manager for the Buffalo Gear & Axle Plant in Buffalo, NY
since the formation of our Company in March 1994. Prior to joining our Company in March 1994, Mr. Monich
worked for General Motors for 22 years in the areas of manufacturing, quality assurance, sales and engineering,
including four years as a Plant Manager.
Jon R. Morrison, age 56 , has been President - AAM North America, Vice President - AAM Corporate since
joining our Company in November 2014. Prior to joining AAM, Mr. Morrison has held executive level positions in the
automotive industry including Vice President Vehicle Dynamics and Controls - WABCO Holdings Inc., President and
General Manager - Meritor WABCO Vehicle Control Systems; General Manager, Plant Manager, Global Director of
Sales and Engineering - Dana Corp., President - PBR Knoxville LLC (a joint venture between PBR International and
Delphi Corp) and Vice President of Sales and Product Planning North America - PBR International. Morrison’s 30-
year automotive and heavy vehicle career includes responsibilities in Finance, Manufacturing, Sales and Marketing,
Engineering as well as managing global customer relationships.
John S. Sofia, age 55, has been Vice President - Global Program Management since November 2012. Prior to
that, he served as Vice President - Commercial Vehicle Business (since March 2008); Vice President - Product
Engineering, Commercial Vehicle Operations & Chief Technology Officer (since December 2007); Vice President -
Engineering & Product Development (since July 2006); Vice President - Quality Assurance & Customer Satisfaction
(since October 2004); Director, Advanced Quality Planning (since August 2002); Plant Manager, Detroit Forge
(since April 2001); Director, Product Engineering (since June 2000); Manager of the Current Production & Process
Engineering Group (since September 1997) and Engineering Manager (since joining our Company in May 1994).
Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Sofia served at Chrysler Corporation for 10 years in a variety of manufacturing
and engineering positions.
Thomas J. Szymanski, age 53, has been Vice President - Driveline Manufacturing Services since November
2014. Prior to that, he served as President - AAM North America, Vice President - AAM Corporate (since January
2014), Vice President - Operations - AAM Americas (since November 2012), Vice President - Global Manufacturing
Services (since November 2010); Executive Director - Manufacturing Planning (since October 2008); Executive
Director - Corporate Manufacturing Services Unibody Vehicles (since January 2008); Director - Cost Estimating &
Advanced Manufacturing Engineering (since August 2006); President & Chief Operating Officer - Colfor
Manufacturing, Inc. (since August 2004); Director - Corporate Manufacturing Engineering (since January 2003);
Plant Manager - Three Rivers Gear & Axle (since March 2000); Plant Manager - Tonawanda Forge (since
December 1998); Manufacturing Manager - Tonawanda Forge (since March 1994); and Area Manager, Axle
Assembly - Buffalo Gear & Axle (since the formation of our Company in March 1994). Prior to joining our Company
in March 1994, Mr. Szymanski worked for General Motors for 11 years in a variety of manufacturing and plant
management positions.
Norman Willemse, age 58, has been Vice President - Metal Formed Product Business Unit since December
2011. Prior to that, he served as Vice President - Global Metal Formed Product Business Unit (since October
2008), Vice President - Global Metal Formed Product Operations (since December 2007); General Manager - Metal
Formed Products Division (since July 2006) and Managing Director - Albion Automotive (since joining our Company
in August 2001). Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Willemse served at ATSAS for seven years as Executive
Director Engineering & Commercial and John Deere for over 17 years in various engineering positions of increasing
responsibility. Mr. Willemse is a professional certified mechanical engineer.
11
Internet Website Access to Reports
The website for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. is www.aam.com. Our Annual Reports on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge
through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains
reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the
SEC. The information contained in the Company's website is not included, or incorporated by reference, in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(d) Financial Information About Geographic Areas
International operations are subject to certain additional risks inherent in conducting business outside the U.S.,
such as changes in currency exchange rates, price and currency exchange controls, import restrictions,
nationalization, expropriation and other governmental action. Financial information relating to our operations by
geographic area is presented in the following table. Net sales are attributed to countries based upon location of
customer. Long-lived assets exclude deferred income taxes.
Net sales
United States ................................................................................. $
Canada ..........................................................................................
Mexico ...........................................................................................
South America ...............................................................................
Asia ...............................................................................................
Europe and other ...........................................................................
Total net sales................................................................................ $
Long-lived assets
United States ................................................................................. $
Mexico ...........................................................................................
South America ...............................................................................
Asia ...............................................................................................
Europe ...........................................................................................
Total long-lived assets ................................................................... $
2014
December 31,
2013
(in millions)
2012
2,073.6 $
64.6
1,055.5
156.5
238.6
107.2
3,696.0 $
885.9 $
513.2
80.5
177.3
94.0
1,750.9 $
1,682.0 $
74.4
865.6
201.1
255.2
129.0
3,207.3 $
850.0 $
469.3
100.2
176.7
93.2
1,689.4 $
1,576.6
75.0
755.1
216.4
214.5
93.3
2,930.9
865.3
417.7
113.3
159.0
72.5
1,627.8
12
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be
considered. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows
could be materially adversely affected.
Our business is significantly dependent on sales to GM and Chrysler.
We are the principal supplier of driveline components to GM for its full-size RWD light trucks and SUVs
manufactured in North America, supplying substantially all of GM's rear axle and 4WD/AWD axle requirements for
these vehicle platforms. Sales to GM were approximately 68% of our consolidated net sales in 2014, 71% in 2013,
and 73% in 2012. A reduction in our sales to GM or a reduction by GM of its production of RWD light trucks or
SUVs, as a result of market share losses of GM or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
We also supply driveline system products for Chrysler's heavy-duty Ram full-size pickup trucks and its
derivatives, as well as the AWD Jeep Cherokee and the AWD Chrysler 200. Sales to Chrysler accounted for
approximately 18% of our consolidated net sales in 2014, 12% in 2013 and 10% in 2012. A reduction in our sales
to Chrysler or a reduction by Chrysler of its production of the Ram program, as a result of market share losses of
Chrysler or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our business may also be adversely affected by reduced demand for the product programs we currently
support, or if we do not obtain sales orders for successor programs that replace our current product programs.
Our business is dependent on the rear-wheel drive light truck and SUV market segments in North
America.
A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from products supporting RWD light truck and SUV platforms in
North America. Sales and production levels of light trucks and SUVs are being affected by many factors, including
changes in consumer demand; product mix shifts favoring other types of light vehicles, such as front-wheel drive
based crossover vehicles and passenger cars; fuel prices; and government regulation, such as the corporate
average fuel economy (CAFE) regulations and related emissions standards promulgated by federal and state
regulators. In 2012, the Obama Administration announced new CAFE standards for cars and light-duty trucks,
raising the standard to the equivalent of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. Our customers are currently planning for
these regulations and the potential impact on consumer preferences and demand for vehicles. A reduction in the
market segment we currently supply could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial
condition.
We are under continuing pressure from our customers to reduce our prices.
Annual price reductions are a common practice in the automotive industry. The majority of our products are sold
under long-term contracts with prices scheduled at the time the contracts are established. Many of our contracts
require us to reduce our prices in subsequent years and most of our contracts allow us to adjust prices for
engineering changes. If we must accommodate a customer's demand for higher annual price reductions and are
unable to offset the impact of any such price reductions through continued technology improvements, cost
reductions or other productivity initiatives, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
13
Our business faces substantial competition.
The automotive industry is highly competitive. Our competitors include the driveline component manufacturing
facilities controlled by OEMs, as well as many other domestic and foreign companies possessing the capability to
produce some or all of the products we supply. Some of our competitors are affiliated with OEMs and others have
economic advantages as compared to our business, such as patents, existing underutilized capacity and lower
wage and benefit costs. Technology, design, quality, delivery and cost are the primary elements of competition in
our industry segment. As a result of these competitive pressures and other industry trends, OEMs and suppliers
are developing strategies to reduce costs. These strategies include supply base consolidation and global sourcing.
Our business may be adversely affected by increased competition from suppliers benefiting from OEM affiliate
relationships or financial and other resources that we do not possess. Our business may also be adversely affected
if we do not sustain our ability to meet customer requirements relative to technology, design, quality, delivery and
cost.
Our business could be adversely affected by disruptions in our supply chain and our customers' supply
chain.
We depend on a limited number of suppliers for certain key components and materials needed for our products.
We rely upon, and expect to continue to rely upon, certain suppliers for critical components and materials that are
not readily available in sufficient volume from other sources. As we continue to expand our global manufacturing
footprint, we need to rely on suppliers in local markets that have not yet proven their ability to meet our
requirements. These supply chain characteristics make us susceptible to supply shortages and price increases. In
addition, over the past several years, many of our direct material suppliers have filed for bankruptcy protection and
restructured their operations to significantly reduce their installed capacity. If production volumes increase rapidly,
there can be no assurance that the suppliers of critical components and materials will be able or willing to meet our
future needs on a timely basis. A significant disruption in the supply of these materials could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Natural disasters, such as the earthquake in Japan and floods in Thailand, affected the automotive industry's
supply chain in 2011. Although our direct supply chain did not suffer material adverse effects from these natural
disasters, future natural disasters could cause a disruption in the supply of critical components to us and our
customers and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
A failure of our information technology (IT) networks and systems, or the inability to successfully
implement upgrades to our enterprise resource planning systems, could adversely impact our business
and operations.
We rely upon information technology networks and systems to process, transmit and store electronic
information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes or activities. Additionally, we and certain of
our third-party vendors collect and store personal information in connection with human resources operations and
other aspects of our business. The secure operation of these information technology networks and systems and the
proper processing and maintenance of this information are critical to our business operations. Despite the
implementation of security measures, our IT systems are at risk to damages from computer viruses, unauthorized
access, cyber attack and other similar disruptions. The occurrence of any of these events could compromise our
networks, and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed or lost. Any such access,
disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties
under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, the disruption of our operations or damage to our
reputation. We may be required to incur significant costs to protect against damage caused by these disruptions or
security breaches in the future.
Further, we are continually expanding and updating our networks and systems in response to the changing
needs of our business. We are currently in the process of developing and testing global enterprise resource
planning (ERP) systems to upgrade many of our existing operating and financial systems. We began implementing
these ERP systems in the first quarter of 2015. Such an implementation is a major undertaking, both financially and
from a management and personnel perspective. Should the systems not be implemented successfully, or if the
systems do not perform in a satisfactory manner once implementation is complete, our business and operations
could be disrupted and our results of operations could be adversely affected, including our ability to report accurate
and timely financial results.
14
General global economic conditions may have an adverse impact on our operating performance and
results of operations.
The automotive industry has continued to improve over the past five years after suffering the effects of the
global financial crisis experienced in 2008 and 2009. The U.S. Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate of sales (SAAR)
has returned to a more normalized rate of 16.4 million units in 2014 from 15.5 million in 2013 and 14.4 million in
2012, as the automotive industry has recovered from the effects of the unprecedented decline in consumer demand
and production volumes. Deteriorating conditions in the U.S. or global economy that result in another reduction or
depressed levels of automotive production and sales by our largest customers may adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, in a flat or declining economic environment, we may
experience the negative effects of increased competitive pricing pressure and customer turnover.
Our company's global operations are subject to risks and uncertainties.
We have business and technical offices and manufacturing facilities in many foreign countries, including Brazil,
China, India, Mexico, Poland, Scotland, Sweden and Thailand. Approximately 9,010 of our 12,820 associates are
located outside of the U.S. International operations are subject to certain risks inherent in conducting business
outside the U.S., such as changes in currency exchange rates, tax laws, price and currency exchange controls,
import restrictions, nationalization, expropriation and other governmental action. Our global operations may also be
adversely affected by political events and domestic or international terrorist events and hostilities. These
uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on the continuity of our business and our results of operations
and financial condition. As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will depend, in part, on our
ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks.
We may incur material losses and costs as a result of product recall or field action, product liability and
warranty claims, litigation and other disputes and claims.
We are exposed to warranty, product recall or field action and product liability claims in the event that our
products fail to perform as expected, and we may be required to participate in a recall of such products. Historically,
we have experienced negligible warranty charges from our customers due to the quality, reliability and durability
performance of our products. We are not responsible for certain warranty claims that may be incurred by our
customers. This includes returned components for which no trouble was found upon inspection, discretionary acts
of dealer goodwill, defects related to certain directed buy components, or build to print design issues. We review
warranty claim activity in detail, and we may have disagreements with our customers as to responsibility for these
types of costs incurred by our customer. In addition, as we continue to diversify our customer base, we have an
increased obligation to share in the cost of providing warranties as part of our agreements with new customers.
Costs and expenses associated with warranties, field actions, product recalls and product liability claims could have
a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition and may differ materially from the
estimated liabilities that we have recorded in our consolidated financial statements.
In addition to warranty claims relating directly to products we produce, potential product recalls for our
customers and their other suppliers, and the potential reputational harm that may result from such product recalls,
could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
We are also involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Although we believe that none of
these matters are likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition, there
can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any such legal proceeding or any future legal proceedings.
15
Our business could be adversely affected if we fail to maintain satisfactory labor relations or if our
customers fail to maintain satisfactory labor relations.
The majority of our hourly associates worldwide are members of industrial trade unions employed under the
terms of collective bargaining agreements. Substantially all of our hourly associates in the U.S. are represented by
the UAW. Approximately 4,045 of our hourly associates at our facilities in Mexico and Brazil are also covered by
collective bargaining agreements which expire annually. There can be no assurance that future negotiations with
our labor unions will be resolved favorably or that we will not experience a work stoppage or disruption that could
have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, there can be no
assurance that such future negotiations will not result in labor cost increases or other terms and conditions that
could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition or our ability to compete for future business.
Further, the inability of our largest customers to maintain satisfactory labor relations with the UAW could also
impact our operations. If our largest customers fail to successfully negotiate labor contracts on or before their
expiration in 2015, potential work stoppages and disruptions in production schedules could result, which may have
a material adverse impact to our results of operations and financial condition.
Our company or our customers may not be able to successfully and efficiently manage the timing and
costs of new product program launches.
Certain of our customers are preparing to launch, or have recently launched, new product programs for which
we will supply newly developed driveline system products and related components. There can be no assurance
that we will successfully complete the transition of our manufacturing facilities and resources to support these new
product programs or other future product programs on a timely and cost efficient basis. Accordingly, the launch of
new product programs may adversely affect production rates or other operational efficiency and profitability
measures at our facilities. We may also experience difficulties with the performance of our supply chain on program
launches, which could result in our inability to meet our contractual obligations to key customers. Production
shortfalls or production delays, if any, could result in our failure to effectively manage our material and freight costs
relating to these program launches. In addition, our customers may delay the launch or fail to successfully execute
the launch of these new product programs, or any additional future product program for which we will supply
products. Our revenues, operating results and financial condition could be adversely impacted if our customers fail
to timely launch such programs or if we are unable to manage the timing requirements and costs of new product
program launches.
Our company may not realize all of the revenue expected from our new and incremental business
backlog.
The realization of incremental revenues from awarded business is inherently subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, including the accuracy of customer estimates relating to the number of vehicles to be produced in
new and existing product programs and the timing of such production. It is also possible that our customers may
delay or cancel a product program that has been awarded to us. Our revenues, operating results and financial
condition could be adversely affected relative to our current financial plans if we do not realize substantially all the
revenue from our new and incremental business backlog.
Negative or unexpected tax consequences could adversely affect our results of operations.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well as various states and foreign jurisdictions. We
are also subject to examinations of these income tax returns by the relevant tax authorities. As of December 31,
2014 and 2013, we have recorded a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits and related interest and penalties
of $59.5 million and $25.8 million, respectively. Based on the status of these audits and the protocol of finalizing
audits by the relevant tax authorities, it is not possible to estimate the impact of changes, if any, to previously
recorded uncertain tax positions. Any negative or unexpected outcomes of these examinations and audits could
have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
16
Our business could be adversely affected by volatility in the price of raw materials.
Worldwide commodity market conditions have resulted in volatility in the cost of steel and other metallic
materials in recent years. As general economic conditions have improved and customer demand has increased,
the cost of steel and metallic materials needed for our products has increased. If we are unable to pass cost
increases on to our customers, this could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
We may be unable to consummate and successfully integrate acquisitions and joint ventures.
As we continue to expand globally and accelerate our diversification efforts, we may pursue strategic growth
initiatives with greater frequency going forward. Engaging in acquisitions and joint ventures involves potential risks,
including failure to successfully integrate and realize the expected benefits of such acquisitions and joint ventures.
Integrating acquired operations is a significant challenge and there is no assurance that we will be able to manage
the integrations successfully. Failure to successfully integrate acquired operations or to realize the expected
benefits of such acquisitions may have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our company's ability to operate effectively could be impaired if we lose key personnel.
Our success depends, in part, on the efforts of our executive officers and other key associates, such as
engineers and global operational leadership. In addition, our future success will depend on, among other factors,
our ability to continue to attract and retain qualified personnel, particularly engineers and other employees with
critical expertise and skills that support key customers and products. The loss of the services of our executive
officers or other key associates, unexpected turnover, or the failure to attract or retain associates, could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We use important intellectual property in our business. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property
or if a third party makes assertions against us or our customers relating to intellectual property rights, our
business could be adversely affected.
We own important intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, and are
involved in numerous licensing arrangements. Our intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining our
competitive position in a number of the markets that we serve. Our competitors may develop technologies that are
similar to our proprietary technologies or design around the patents we own or license. Further, as we expand our
operations in jurisdictions where the protection of intellectual property rights is less robust, the risk of others duplicating
our proprietary technologies increases, despite efforts we undertake to protect them. Developments or assertions by
or against us relating to intellectual property rights, and any inability to protect these rights, could materially adversely
affect our business and our competitive position.
17
Our financial condition and operations may be adversely affected by a violation of financial and other
covenants.
Our revolving credit facility contains financial covenants related to secured and unsecured indebtedness
leverage and interest coverage. The revolving credit facility limits our ability to make certain investments, loans and
guarantees, declare dividends or distributions on capital stock, redeem or repurchase capital stock and certain debt
obligations, incur liens, incur indebtedness, enter into certain restrictive agreements, merge, make acquisitions or
sell all or substantially all of our assets. The indenture governing our senior unsecured notes also restricts our
ability to incur debt secured by liens, engage in consolidations or mergers or sell all or substantially all of our assets,
and engage in certain sale and leaseback transactions. The revolving credit facility also significantly restricts our
ability to incur additional secured debt. The revolving credit facility and the indentures governing our senior
unsecured notes also include customary events of default. Obligations under the revolving credit facility, the 7.75%
senior unsecured notes due 2019 (7.75% Notes), the 6.625% senior unsecured notes due 2022 (6.625% Notes),
the 6.25% senior unsecured notes due 2021 (6.25% Notes) and our 5.125% senior unsecured notes due 2019
(5.125% Notes) are required to be guaranteed by most of our U.S. subsidiaries that hold domestic assets. In
addition, the revolving credit facility is secured on a first priority basis by all or substantially all of the assets of AAM,
Inc., the assets of Holdings and each guarantor's assets, including a pledge of capital stock of our U.S. subsidiaries
that hold domestic assets, including each guarantor, and a portion of the capital stock of the first tier foreign
subsidiaries of AAM. A violation of any of these covenants or agreements could result in a default under these
contracts, which could permit the lenders or note holders to accelerate repayment of any borrowings or notes
outstanding at that time and levy on the collateral granted in connection with these contracts. A default or
acceleration under the revolving credit facility or the indentures governing the senior unsecured notes may result in
increased capital costs and defaults under our other debt agreements and may adversely affect our ability to
operate our business, our subsidiaries' and guarantors' ability to operate their respective businesses and our results
of operations and financial condition.
Our company faces substantial pension and other postretirement benefit obligations.
We have significant pension and other postretirement benefit obligations to certain of our associates and
retirees. Our ability to satisfy the funding requirements associated with these obligations will depend on our cash
flow from operations and our ability to access credit and the capital markets. The funding requirements of these
benefit plans, and the related expense reflected in our financial statements, are affected by several factors that are
subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty and volatility, including governmental regulation. Key assumptions
used to value these benefit obligations and the cost of providing such benefits, funding requirements and expense
recognition include the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on pension assets, mortality rates and
the health care cost trend rate. If the actual trends in these factors are less favorable than our assumptions, this
could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is subject to costs associated with environmental, health and safety regulations.
Our operations are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing, among
other things, emissions to air, discharge to waters and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment
and disposal of waste and other materials. We believe that our operations and facilities have been and are being
operated in compliance, in all material respects, with such laws and regulations, many of which provide for
substantial fines and criminal sanctions for violations. The operation of our manufacturing facilities entails risks in
these areas, however, and there can be no assurance that we will not incur material costs or liabilities. In addition,
potentially significant expenditures could be required in order to comply with evolving environmental, health and
safety laws, regulations or other pertinent requirements that may be adopted or imposed in the future by
governmental authorities.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
18
Item 2.
Properties
We operate in 13 countries and have 37 manufacturing, engineering and business office facilities worldwide of
which the principal facilities are:
Name
Three Rivers Manufacturing Facility
Three Rivers, MI .......................
Lancaster Manufacturing Facility
Lancaster, Pennsylvania...........
Colfor Manufacturing, Inc.
Malvern, OH
Minerva, OH ..............................
MSP Industries
Oxford, MI .................................
Oxford Forge
Oxford, MI .................................
AccuGear, Inc.
Fort Wayne, IN .........................
DieTronik
Auburn Hills, MI ........................
Guanajuato Manufacturing
Complex
Guanajuato, Mexico ..................
Type of
Interest
Owned
Function
Front and rear axles, rear drive modules, power transfer
units, driveheads and steering linkages
Leased
Assembly of axles and driveheads for commercial vehicles
Owned
Leased
Forged products
Forged and machined products and rear axles
Forged and machined products
Owned
Forged products
Owned
Forged and machined products
Owned
Tool & die manufacturer and machined products
Owned
Rear axles and driveshafts, front axles, front auxiliary
driveshafts, forging products, rear drive modules, power
transfer units and transfer cases
Silao Manufacturing Facility
Leased
Machined products
Silao, Mexico.............................
AccuGear - Silao
Silao, Mexico ............................
Araucária Manufacturing Facility
Araucária, Brazil........................
Rayong Manufacturing Facility
Rayong, Thailand ......................
Owned
Forged and machined products
Owned
Front and rear axles, machining of forged and cast
products and constant velocity joints
Owned
Front and rear axles and driveshafts
Albion Automotive
Glasgow, Scotland ....................
Leased
Front and rear axles for medium and heavy-duty trucks
and buses and transfer cases
Changshu Manufacturing Facility
Owned
Changshu, China ......................
Front axles, independent rear drive axles, rear drive
modules, gear sets and machined cases
Pantnagar Manufacturing Facility
Pantnagar, India ........................
Pune Manufacturing Facility
Pune, India ................................
Chennai Manufacturing Facility
Chennai, India ...........................
Swidnica Manufacturing Facility
Swidnica, Poland ......................
World Headquarters
Detroit, MI .................................
Quality Engineering Technical
Center
Auburn Hills, MI .........................
Technical Center
Rochester Hills, MI ....................
Owned
Rear axles and driveshafts
Owned
Rear axles and driveheads
Owned
Assembly of front and rear axles
Owned
Transmission differentials and machined products
Owned
Executive and administrative offices
Owned
Prototypes, R&D and design engineering
Owned
R&D, design engineering, metallurgy, testing and validation
We believe that our property and equipment is properly maintained and in good operating condition. We will
continue to evaluate capacity requirements in light of current and projected market conditions. We also intend to
continue redeploying assets in order to increase our capacity utilization and reduce future capital expenditures to
support program launches.
19
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Although the outcome of these matters
cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will
have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental and occupational safety and health
laws, regulations and ordinances, including those regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management
and environmental cleanup. We closely monitor our environmental conditions to ensure that we are in compliance
with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. We have made, and will continue to make, capital and other
expenditures to comply with environmental requirements, including recurring administrative costs. Such
expenditures were not significant in 2014, 2013 and 2012.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
under the symbol “AXL.”
Stockholders and High and Low Sales Prices
2014
2013
High .......... $
Low ........... $
High .......... $
Low ........... $
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
Full Year
21.15 $
17.84 $
13.72 $
11.03 $
19.61 $
17.29 $
18.63 $
11.94 $
19.81 $
16.77 $
20.94 $
18.65 $
22.79 $
16.40 $
20.45 $
17.41 $
22.79
16.40
20.94
11.03
Prices are the quarterly high and low closing sales prices for our common stock as reported by the NYSE. We
had approximately 315 stockholders of record as of February 19, 2015.
Dividends
We did not declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in 2014. Our revolving credit agreement
limits our ability to declare or pay dividends or distributions on capital stock.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The information regarding our securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is
incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement.
20
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
FIVE YEAR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2011
(in millions, except per share data)
2012
2010
Statement of income data
Net sales ............................................... $ 3,696.0
522.8
Gross profit ............................................
Selling, general and
administrative expenses .....................
Operating income ..................................
Net interest expense .............................
Net income ............................................
Net income attributable to AAM.............
Diluted earnings per share .................... $
267.6
(97.8)
143.0 (a)
143.0 (a)
1.85
255.2
Balance sheet data
Cash and cash equivalents ................... $
Total assets ...........................................
Total long-term debt ..............................
Total AAM stockholders' equity (deficit)
Dividends declared per share................
249.2
3,259.2
1,523.4
113.4
—
$ 3,207.3
478.7
$2,930.9
399.7
$2,585.0
$2,283.0
458.0 (f)
407.2 (f)
238.4
240.3
(115.3)
94.5 (b)
94.5 (b)
1.23
$
243.3
156.4
(101.0)
366.7 (b)(c)(d)
367.7 (b)(c)(d)
4.87
$
231.7
226.3 (f)
(82.7)
139.5 (b)(e)(f)
145.2 (b)(e)(f)
1.93 (f)
$
197.6
209.6 (f)
(85.2)
119.0 (f)
119.9 (f)
1.61 (f)
154.0
3,027.5 (f)
1,559.1
40.5 (f)
—
$
62.4
2,864.5 (f)
1,454.1
(113.9) (f)
—
$ 169.2
2,327.2 (f)
1,180.2
(418.6) (f)
—
$ 244.6
2,113.7 (f)
1,010.0
(475.0) (f)
—
$
$
Statement of cash flows data
Cash provided by (used in) operating
activities ............................................. $
Cash used in investing activities ...........
Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities .............................................
318.4
(195.3)
$
223.0
$ (175.5)
(218.7)
(185.4)
$ (56.3)
(184.1)
$ 240.3
(107.0)
(21.4)
88.8
253.5
167.2
(66.4)
Other data
Depreciation and amortization............... $
Capital expenditures .............................
Purchase buyouts of leased equipment
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of
equipment ..........................................
199.9
206.5
—
—
$
177.0
$ 152.2
$ 139.4
251.9
—
24.1
207.6
—
12.1
163.1
13.4
—
$ 131.6
108.3
7.8
—
(a)
Includes a settlement charge of $23.1 million, net of tax, related to our terminated vested lump-sum pension payout in the U.S.
(b)
Includes charges of $35.1 million, net of tax, in 2013, $19.8 million in 2012, and $3.1 million in 2011 related to debt refinancing and
redemption costs.
(c)
Includes net special charges, curtailment gains, asset impairments and asset redeployment and other restructuring costs associated
with plant closures of $40.6 million (including $28.7 million of expense related to contractual termination benefits provided to certain
eligible UAW associates as a result of the DMC and CKMF plant closures).
(d)
Includes the impact of the reversal of our valuation allowance on U.S. federal deferred tax assets of $337.5 million in the fourth
quarter of 2012.
(e)
Includes asset impairments, other non-recurring costs and tax refunds of $16.6 million in 2011 (including $0.5 million related to the
non-controlling interest portion of a $1.6 million asset impairment recorded by e-AAM).
(f) Due to the immaterial error discussed in Note 1, these balances have been revised. For further discussion of the revision, see Note 1
- Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
21
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
COMPANY OVERVIEW
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) and its subsidiaries (collectively, we, our, us or AAM)
is a Tier I supplier to the automotive industry. We manufacture, engineer, design and validate driveline and
drivetrain systems and related components and chassis modules for light trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUVs),
passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles. Driveline and drivetrain systems include components
that transfer power from the transmission and deliver it to the drive wheels. Our driveline, drivetrain and related
products include axles, chassis modules, driveshafts, power transfer units, transfer cases, chassis and steering
components, driveheads, transmission parts, electric drive systems and metal-formed products. In addition to
locations in the United States (U.S.) (Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania), we also have offices or facilities in
Brazil, China, Germany, India, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Poland, Scotland, South Korea, Sweden and Thailand.
We are the principal supplier of driveline components to General Motors Company (GM) for its full-size rear-
wheel drive (RWD) light trucks and SUVs manufactured in North America, supplying substantially all of GM's rear
axle and four-wheel drive and all-wheel drive (4WD/AWD) axle requirements for these vehicle platforms. Sales to
GM were approximately 68% of our consolidated net sales in 2014, 71% in 2013, and 73% in 2012.
We are the sole-source supplier to GM for certain axles and other driveline products for the life of each GM
vehicle program covered by Lifetime Program Contracts and Long Term Program Contracts (collectively, LPCs).
Substantially all of our sales to GM are made pursuant to the LPCs. The LPCs have terms equal to the lives of the
relevant vehicle programs or their respective derivatives, which typically run 5 to 7 years, and require us to remain
competitive with respect to technology, design and quality.
We also supply driveline system products to FCA US LLC, formerly known as Chrysler Group LLC (Chrysler),
for heavy-duty Ram full-size pickup trucks and its derivatives, as well as the AWD Jeep Cherokee and the AWD
Chrysler 200. Sales to Chrysler were approximately 18% of our consolidated net sales in 2014, 12% in 2013 and
10% in 2012. In addition to GM and Chrysler, we supply driveline systems and other related components to
Volkswagen AG (Volkswagen), Audi AG (Audi), Mack Trucks Inc. (Mack Truck), Harley-Davidson Inc., Nissan Motor
Co., Ltd. (Nissan), PACCAR Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Jaguar Land Rover Limited (JLR), Daimler Truck, Deere &
Company, Ford Motor Company (Ford) and other original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and Tier I supplier
companies such as Jatco Ltd. and Hino Motors Ltd. Our consolidated net sales to customers other than GM
increased 29% to $1,199.9 million in 2014 as compared to $926.7 million in 2013 and $792.6 million in 2012.
INDUSTRY TRENDS
There are a number of significant trends affecting the highly competitive automotive industry. As general
economic and industry specific conditions have stabilized and improved, the global automotive industry continues to
experience intense competition, volatility in fuel, steel, metallic and other commodity prices and significant pricing
pressures. At the same time, the industry is intently focused on investing in future products that will incorporate the
latest technology, meet changing customer demands and comply with more stringent government regulations.
In 2014, the U.S. SAAR increased to 16.4 million units, which compares to 15.5 million units in 2013 and 14.4
million units in 2012, as the U.S. economy and domestic automotive industry continued to recover. As a result of a
reduction in oil prices, pent-up demand and the increasing age of vehicles currently on the road, we believe that the
U.S. domestic OEMs and their suppliers will continue to be able to capitalize on these trends and provide improved
financial performance.
MORE STRINGENT GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS FOR FUEL-EFFICIENCY AND EMISSIONS
REDUCTIONS With a shift towards aggressive, environmentally focused legislation in the U.S., there has been an
increased demand for technologies designed to help reduce emissions, increase fuel economy and minimize the
environmental impact of vehicles. In 2012, the Obama Administration announced the new CAFE standard for cars
and light-duty trucks, raising the standard to the equivalent of 54.5 miles per gallon, by 2025. As a result, OEMs
and suppliers are competing intensely to develop and market new and alternative technologies, such as electric
vehicles, hybrid vehicles, fuel cells, diesel engines and efficiency improvements of driveline systems to improve fuel
economy and emissions.
22
We are responding to the continuing change in vehicle mix in the North American market as well as expected
increases in CAFE regulations, with ongoing research and development (R&D) efforts that focus on fuel economy,
emission reduction and environmental improvements. These efforts have led to new business awards for products
that support AWD and RWD passenger cars and crossover vehicles and further position us to compete as this
product mix shift continues. We are continuing to invest in the development of advanced products focused on fuel
economy, mass reductions, vehicle safety and performance, while leveraging electronics and technology. We have
increased our focus on alternative energy and electronics by investing in product development that is consistent
with the continued shift in market demand. Approximately 75% of AAM's new and incremental business backlog
launching from 2015 to 2017, which is an estimated $825 million, relates to AAM's newest AWD systems for
passenger cars and crossover vehicles. These systems are designed to improve fuel efficiency by up to 30%,
reduce CO2 emissions and provide AWD capability with the additional benefit of improved vehicle stability when
compared to traditional mechanical AWD systems. We have also developed and commercialized a disconnecting
AWD system, which strengthens AAM's position as a leader in global driveline systems technology. AAM's
EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system is an industry-first technology that seamlessly engages AWD functionality
while improving fuel efficiency and reducing CO2 emissions. The system is featured on the award-winning Jeep
Cherokee and Chrysler 200.
AAM has established a high-efficiency product portfolio that is designed to improve axle efficiency and fuel
economy through innovative product design technology. Our lineup of high efficiency axles for rear-wheel drive and
AWD applications is featured on multiple new vehicles, including GM's Cadillac ATS, which was named the 2013
North American Car of the Year. Our high efficiency rear-drive module is also featured on the Cadillac CTS, Motor
Trend's 2014 Car of the Year. Through the development of our EcoTrac® Disconnecting AWD system, our high
efficiency axles, PowerLite® axles, PowerDense® gears and our e-AAM hybrid and electric driveline systems, we
have significantly advanced our efforts to improve fuel efficiency and ride and handling performance while reducing
emissions and mass.
INCREASE IN DEMAND FOR ELECTRONIC INTEGRATION The electronic content of vehicles continues to
expand, largely driven by consumer demand for greater vehicle performance, functionality, and affordable
convenience options. This demand is a result of increased communication abilities in vehicles as well as
increasingly stringent regulatory standards for energy efficiency, emissions reduction and increased safety. As
these electronics continue to become more reliable and affordable, we expect this trend to continue. The increased
use of electronics provides greater flexibility in vehicles and enables the OEMs to better control vehicle stability, fuel
efficiency and safety while improving the overall driving experience. Suppliers with enhanced capability in
electronic integration have greater sourcing opportunities with OEMs and may be able to obtain more favorable
pricing for these products.
GLOBAL AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTION The trend toward the globalization of automotive production
continues to intensify in regions such as Asia (particularly China, India, South Korea and Thailand), Eastern Europe
and South America. Automotive production in these regions is expected to continue to grow while production in the
traditional automotive centers such as North America and Western Europe have improved from recent declines. As
our customers continue to design their products for global markets, they will continue to require global support from
their suppliers. For this reason, it is critical that we maintain a global presence in these markets in order to remain
competitive for new contracts. We have significantly increased our global installed capacity to support current
programs and future opportunities. We have expanded our capacity in Brazil, China, Mexico, Poland, Thailand and
the U.S. and constructed new facilities in Mexico and the U.S. We also have offices in China, India and South
Korea to support these developing markets. We expect our business activity in these markets to increase
significantly over the next several years. Approximately 60% of our new and incremental business backlog is for
end use markets outside the U.S. and approximately 85% has been sourced to our manufacturing facilities outside
the U.S.
23
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NET SALES Net sales increased by 15% to $3,696.0 million in 2014 as compared to $3,207.3 million in 2013
and $2,930.9 million in 2012.
The increase in sales in 2014, as compared to 2013, primarily reflects an increase of approximately 8% in
production volumes for the North American light truck and SUV programs we currently support for GM and Chrysler
and higher sales in support of Chrysler's AWD Jeep Cherokee.
Our sales in 2013, as compared to 2012, reflect an increase in global launch activity principally related to
higher production volumes for the major North American light truck programs we currently support, additional
content on GM and Chrysler's next generation full-size pickup truck programs and a 17% increase in non-GM sales.
Our content-per-vehicle (CPV) (as measured by the dollar value of our products supporting our customers'
North American light truck and SUV programs) increased to $1,667 in 2014 as compared to $1,550 in 2013 and
$1,473 in 2012. The increases in CPV in 2014 as compared to 2013, and 2013 as compared to 2012, principally
reflect additional content on GM and Chrysler's next generation full-size pickup truck programs.
Our 4WD/AWD penetration rate increased to 68.5% in 2014 as compared to 66.1% in 2013 and 64.4% in 2012.
We define 4WD/AWD penetration as the total number of front axles we produce divided by the total number of rear
axles we produce for the vehicle programs we support.
GROSS PROFIT Gross profit increased to $522.8 million in 2014 as compared to $478.7 million in 2013 and
$399.7 million in 2012. Gross margin was 14.1% in 2014 as compared to 14.9% in 2013 and 13.6% in 2012. The
increase in gross profit in 2014 as compared to 2013 is primarily due to the profit contribution from higher sales,
including our largest North American light truck programs and other global launches. Gross profit in 2014 also
included the adverse impact of a $31.2 million settlement charge related to a voluntary lump-sum pension payout
which was offered to eligible terminated vested participants in our U.S. hourly pension plans.
The increase in gross profit in 2013 as compared to 2012 is primarily due to the profit contribution from higher
sales, including our largest North American light truck programs and other global launches. The increase in gross
profit in 2013 also reflected lower warranty accruals and the impact of stabilized levels of global launch activity,
which includes lower material and freight costs, as compared to 2012. In addition, our gross profit in 2013 also
included the impact of receiving $11.4 million related to settling a capacity increase cancellation claim with one of
our largest customers, which is partially offset by other costs associated with this capacity increase.
Gross profit in 2012 included special charges of $28.7 million of expense related to contractual termination
benefits provided to certain eligible UAW associates as a result of the DMC and CKMF plant closures and $32.5
million of expense primarily related to asset impairments, asset redeployment and other restructuring costs
associated with the closure of DMC and CKMF. The impact on gross profit as a result of these special charges was
partially offset by a $21.8 million other postretirement benefits (OPEB) curtailment gain recorded as a result of the
DMC and CKMF hourly associates who have terminated employment from AAM as a result of our plant closures
and a $5.2 million settlement gain related to the termination of the UAW Legal Services Plan. Also included in
gross profit in 2012, is a gain of $2.2 million related to the sale of CKMF.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (SG&A) SG&A (including R&D) was $255.2 million
in 2014 as compared to $238.4 million in 2013 and $243.3 million in 2012. SG&A as a percentage of net sales was
6.9% in 2014, 7.4% in 2013 and 8.3% in 2012. R&D spending in product, process and systems, net of customer
engineering, design and development (ED&D) recoveries, was $103.9 million in 2014 as compared to $103.4
million in 2013 and $123.4 million in 2012. The change in SG&A in 2014 as compared to 2013 is primarily due to
an increase in costs associated with upgrades to our enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. SG&A in 2014
also included the adverse impact of a $4.3 million settlement charge related to a voluntary lump-sum pension
payout which was offered to eligible terminated vested participants in our U.S. salaried pension plan.
The change in SG&A in 2013 as compared to 2012 primarily reflects the favorable impact of lower R&D
expense, which included customer ED&D recoveries. This was partially offset by higher incentive compensation
accruals and stock-based compensation expense.
24
OPERATING INCOME Operating income increased to $267.6 million in 2014 as compared to $240.3 million in
2013 and $156.4 million in 2012. Operating margin was 7.2% in 2014 as compared to 7.5% in 2013 and 5.3% in
2012. The changes in operating income and operating margin in 2014, 2013 and 2012 were due to the factors
discussed in Sales, Gross Profit and SG&A.
INTEREST EXPENSE Interest expense was $99.9 million in 2014, $115.9 million in 2013 and $101.6 million in
2012. The decrease in interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 reflects the decrease in our weighted-
average interest rate and lower average outstanding borrowings during 2014 as compared to 2013. The increase in
interest expense in 2013 as compared to 2012 reflects higher average outstanding borrowings.
The weighted-average interest rate of our total debt outstanding was 6.3%, 7.3% and 7.8% during 2014, 2013
and 2012, respectively.
INVESTMENT INCOME Investment income was $2.1 million in 2014 and $0.6 million in both 2013 and 2012.
Investment income includes interest and dividends earned on cash and cash equivalents during the period.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) Following are the components of Other Income (Expense) for 2014, 2013 and
2012:
Debt refinancing and redemption costs In 2013, we expensed $36.8 million of unamortized debt issuance
costs, discount and prepayment premiums related to the termination of our class C loan facility, the purchase and
voluntary redemption of $300.0 million of our 7.875% senior unsecured notes (7.875% Notes) and the voluntary
redemption of the remaining $340.0 million of our 9.25% senior secured notes (9.25% Notes). In 2012, we
expensed $19.8 million of unamortized debt issuance costs, discount and prepayment premiums related to our
amended and restated revolving credit agreement, the purchase and redemption of $250.0 million of our 5.25%
senior unsecured notes and the voluntary redemption of $42.5 million of our 9.25% Notes.
Other, net Other, net, which includes the net effect of foreign exchange gains and losses and our proportionate
share of earnings from equity in unconsolidated subsidiaries, was income of $6.9 million in 2014, and expense of
$1.9 million and $4.1 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) Income tax expense (benefit) was expense of $33.7 million in 2014 as
compared to a benefit of $8.2 million and $335.2 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our effective income tax
rate was 19.1% in 2014 as compared to negative 9.5% in 2013 and negative 1,064.2% in 2012.
The following is a reconciliation of our provision for income taxes to the expected amounts using statutory rates:
Federal statutory .....................................................................
Foreign income taxes .............................................................
Change in enacted tax rates ...................................................
State and local ........................................................................
Tax credits...............................................................................
Valuation allowance ................................................................
U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings .................................
Uncertain tax positions ...........................................................
Other .......................................................................................
Effective income tax rate .........................................................
2014
2013
2012
35.0%
(25.1)
—
0.1
(11.4)
4.5
1.9
13.0
1.1
19.1%
35.0 %
(48.5)
(9.9)
0.2
—
12.4
(0.2)
(0.5)
2.0
(9.5)%
35.0 %
(85.0)
—
3.5
—
(985.0)
(29.5)
(5.2)
2.0
(1,064.2)%
Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2014 and 2013 primarily reflect favorable foreign tax rates,
along with our inability to realize a tax benefit for current foreign losses. In 2014, we recorded tax expense of $23.1
million for changes to prior year uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing and expense of $3.4 million for a
change in estimate for U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings. We also recorded a net tax benefit of $20.1 million
in 2014 related to our ability to utilize tax credits in future periods resulting in the recognition of a deferred tax asset.
25
In 2013, new Mexican tax reform was enacted that, among other things, increased the tax rate related to
Maquiladora Companies from 17.5% to 30%. We recorded a tax benefit of $8.5 million as a result of revaluing our
deferred tax assets at the newly enacted rate. In 2013, we recorded tax expense of $4.8 million relating to changes
in estimates in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. Our income tax benefit and effective tax rate for 2013 also
reflects the impact of recording a tax benefit of $1.5 million relating to the release of a prior year unrecognized tax
benefit due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations and a tax benefit of $3.3 million relating to an
election we made in 2013 regarding the treatment of foreign exchange gains and losses in a foreign jurisdiction.
During 2013, we also settled various income tax audits resulting in a reduction of our liability for unrecognized
income tax benefits of $8.4 million and a cash payment of $4.7 million.
In 2012, our business returned to a position of cumulative profitability on a pre-tax basis, considering our
operating results for the three years ended December 31, 2012. We concluded that this record of cumulative
profitability in recent years, in addition to the restructuring of our U.S. operations and our long range forecast
showing continued profitability, provided sufficient positive evidence that our net U.S. federal tax benefits more likely
than not would be realized. Accordingly, in 2012, we released the valuation allowance against our net federal
deferred tax assets for entities in the U.S., resulting in a $337.5 million benefit in our 2012 provision for income
taxes. Our income tax benefit and effective tax rate in 2012 reflected the impact of this valuation allowance
reversal.
Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2012 also reflect a net tax expense of $1.3 million related to
the amendment of state income tax returns as a result of the settlement of federal income tax audits for the tax
years 2004 through 2007.
As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we have a valuation allowance of $156.9 million and $163.7
million, respectively, related to net deferred tax assets in several foreign jurisdictions and U.S. state and local
jurisdictions. See "Critical Accounting Estimates – Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets and Other Tax Liabilities" below
for more detail on the impact of this reversal.
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO AAM AND EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS) Net income attributable to
AAM was $143.0 million in 2014 as compared to $94.5 million in 2013 and $367.7 million in 2012. Diluted earnings
per share was $1.85 in 2014 as compared to $1.23 per share in 2013 and $4.87 per share in 2012. Net Income
and EPS were primarily impacted by the factors discussed in Gross Profit, SG&A, Interest Expense, Debt
Refinancing and Redemption Costs and Income Tax Expense (Benefit).
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures, debt service obligations and our working capital
requirements. We believe that operating cash flow, available cash and cash equivalent balances and available
committed borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet these needs.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net cash provided by operating activities was $318.4 million in 2014 as compared
to net cash provided by operating activities of $223.0 million in 2013 and net cash used in operating activities of
$175.5 million in 2012.
Sales and production volumes Cash provided by operating activities was favorably impacted by higher
profits related to an increase in sales and production activity in 2014, 2013 and 2012.
Deferred Revenue In the first quarter of 2014, we reached an agreement with GM to increase installed
capacity and adjust product mix for our largest vehicle program. As a result of this agreement, we received $32.8
million in 2014 and recorded the payments as deferred revenue, of which we recognized $5.4 million of revenue
related to this agreement in 2014. As of December 31, 2014, we have $6.9 million of deferred revenue that is
classified as a current liability and $20.5 million of deferred revenue that is recorded as a noncurrent liability on our
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Also in the first quarter of 2014, we reached an agreement with GM to recover certain costs related to the delay
of another major product program. We initially recorded deferred revenue of $9.3 million related to this agreement.
We began recognizing this deferred revenue as revenue in the third quarter of 2014 when this program launched in
certain markets. In 2014, we recognized revenue of $0.5 million related to this agreement. As of December 31,
26
2014 we have recorded deferred revenue of $8.8 million, $1.1 million of which is classified as a current liability and
$7.7 million which is recorded as a noncurrent liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Interest paid Interest paid in 2014 was $91.1 million as compared to $123.2 million in 2013 and $88.9 million
in 2012. The decrease in interest paid in 2014 as compared to 2013 primarily relates to a reduction in interest
expense driven by lower average outstanding borrowings and lower average interest rates in 2014 as compared to
2013. The increase in interest paid in 2013, as compared to 2012, primarily reflects higher average outstanding
borrowings during the year and the early payment of interest related to debt refinancing.
Pension and OPEB Due to our significant pension contributions made in 2012, we were not required to make
any cash payments in 2014 or 2013 to satisfy our regulatory funding requirements. We contributed $225.4 million
to our pension trusts in 2012, which included our regulatory funding requirements of $35.0 million. These funding
figures compare to our annual pension expense, including special and contractual termination benefits and
settlements of $32.0 million in 2014, $5.7 million in 2013 and $24.6 million in 2012.
In 2012, AAM and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation entered into an agreement regarding any liability
that may have arisen under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in connection with the closures
of DMC and CKMF. As part of this agreement, in 2012, we contributed $114.7 million in excess of our statutory
minimum to our U.S. hourly pension plan, which is included in the contributions described above.
Our cash outlay for OPEB, net of GM cost sharing, was $11.8 million in 2014, $11.2 million in 2013, and $11.5
million in 2012. This compares to our annual postretirement cost, including special and contractual termination
benefits, curtailment gains and settlements, of $13.4 million in 2014, $12.7 million in 2013, and $3.3 million in 2012.
We expect our cash outlay for other postretirement benefit obligations in 2015, net of GM cost sharing, to be
approximately $16 million.
On September 22, 2014, we announced a plan to offer a voluntary one-time lump sum payment option to
certain eligible terminated vested participants in our U.S. pension plans that, if accepted, would settle our pension
obligations to them (“AAM Pension Payout Offer”). The lump sum settlements, which were paid from plan assets,
reduced our liabilities and administrative costs going forward.
The AAM Pension Payout Offer was open from October 2, 2014 through November 12, 2014 to approximately
6,000 of our 14,000 total U.S. pension plan participants. In addition to the lump sum payment option, the AAM
Pension Payout Offer allowed participants to commence payment of their monthly benefits early.
In total, 3,335 participants accepted the offer and we made a one-time lump sum payment from our pension
trust of $104.2 million on December 19, 2014. As a result of this settlement, we remeasured the assets and
liabilities of our U.S. pension plans, which reduced our projected benefit obligation by $131.1 million and resulted in
a non-cash charge of $35.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 related to the accelerated recognition of certain
deferred losses.
Accounts receivable Accounts receivable at year-end 2014 were $532.7 million as compared to $458.5
million at year-end 2013 and $463.4 million at year-end 2012. The increase in our year-end 2014 accounts
receivable balance was primarily due to increased sales in November and December 2014 as compared to
November and December of 2013, as well as the timing of weekly payments from GM.
Inventories At year-end 2014, inventories were $248.8 million as compared to $261.8 million at year-end
2013 and $224.3 million at year-end 2012. The decrease in inventory in 2014, as compared to 2013, primarily
reflects a reduction in launch related activities at year-end, as well as inventory reduction initiatives. The increase
in inventory in 2013, as compared to 2012, primarily reflects increased materials on hand to support increased
production levels in our current programs and new programs launched in 2014.
Accounts payable At year-end 2014, accounts payable were $444.3 million as compared to $437.4 million at
year-end 2013 and $387.7 million at year-end 2012. The increase in accounts payable at year-end 2013, as
compared to year-end 2012, primarily reflects an increase in sales and production volumes.
Cash paid for special charges In 2012, we made cash payments of $37.9 million for special charges
primarily related to asset redeployment, capital expenditures and other costs associated with the closure of DMC
and CKMF in 2012.
27
GM Payment Terms As a result of a change in the administration of GM supplier payment terms from pay on
shipment to pay on receipt, our operating cash flow was negatively impacted by approximately $33.1 million in
2012.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES Capital expenditures were $206.5 million in 2014, $251.9 million in 2013 and $207.6
million in 2012. Our capital spending primarily supported our significant global program launches within our new
and incremental business backlog, as well as the upgrades to our ERP systems.
We expect our capital spending in 2015 to be approximately 5% of sales, which includes support for our global
program launches in 2015 and 2016 within our new and incremental business backlog.
In the first quarter of 2014, we sold our Detroit Manufacturing Complex and received net proceeds of $9.2
million related to this transaction. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we have classified $7.2 million of these
proceeds, which represents the amount related to the land and building for which we will have no future continuing
involvement, in the Investing Activities section of our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
In 2013 and 2012, we entered into various sale-leaseback transactions for equipment recently purchased. We
received proceeds of $24.1 million and $12.1 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to these transactions.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES Net cash used in financing activities was $21.4 million in 2014 as compared to cash
provided by financing activities of $88.8 million in 2013 and $253.5 million in 2012. Total debt outstanding was
$1,536.4 million at year-end 2014, $1,559.1 million at year-end 2013 and $1,454.1 million at year-end 2012. The
decrease in total debt outstanding at year-end 2014, as compared to year-end 2013, was primarily due to
repayments on certain current maturities of long-term debt. The increase in total debt outstanding at year-end
2013, as compared to year-end 2012, was primarily due to the issuance of $400.0 million of 6.25% senior
unsecured notes, $200.0 million of 5.125% senior unsecured notes (5.125% Notes) and $150.0 million drawn under
our term facility, which was partially offset by using these proceeds to purchase and redeem $300.0 million of our
7.875% Notes and to redeem the remaining $340.0 million of our 9.25% Notes.
REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AND TERM FACILITY As of December 31, 2014, the revolving credit facility
provided up to $523.5 million of revolving bank financing commitments through September 13, 2018. At
December 31, 2014, $505.5 million was available under the revolving credit facility, which reflected a reduction of
$18.0 million for standby letters of credit issued against the facility.
The credit agreement provides for a senior secured term loan A facility in an aggregate principal amount of
$150.0 million (term facility). During 2014, we made principal payments of $7.5 million on our term facility. We also
paid remaining debt issuance costs of $0.1 million in 2014 associated with the execution of amending our revolving
credit facility and term facility. In 2013 and 2012, we paid debt issuance costs of $6.9 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, associated with the amendments and restatements of our revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the revolving credit facility and term facility bear interest at rates based on adjusted LIBOR or
an alternate base rate, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for LIBOR-based loans will be between
1.5% and 3.0%.
Under the revolving credit facility, certain negative covenants were revised to provide increased flexibility. In the
event AAM achieves investment grade corporate credit ratings from S&P and Moody's, AAM may elect to release all
of the collateral from the liens granted pursuant to the collateral agreement, subject to notice requirements and
other conditions. The revolving credit facility and term facility are secured on a first priority basis by all or
substantially all of the assets of AAM and each guarantor under the collateral agreement dated as of November 7,
2008, as amended and restated as of September 13, 2013.
The revolving credit facility provides back-up liquidity for our foreign credit facilities. We intend to use the
availability of long-term financing under the revolving credit facility to refinance any current maturities related to
such debt agreements that are not otherwise refinanced on a long-term basis in their local markets, except where
otherwise reclassified to current portion of long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
28
In the first quarter of 2013, we terminated our class C loan facility of $72.8 million, which would have matured
on June 30, 2013. Upon termination, we expensed $0.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the
class C facility. We had been amortizing the debt issuance costs over the expected life of the borrowing.
9.25% NOTES In 2009, we issued $425.0 million of 9.25% Notes. The notes were issued at a discount of $5.5
million. Net proceeds from these notes were used for the repayment of certain indebtedness.
In 2012, we elected to exercise an option to redeem 10% of the original amount of our 9.25% Notes
outstanding at a redemption price of 103% of the principal amount. This resulted in a principal payment of $42.5
million and $1.3 million for the redemption premium, as well as payment of accrued interest. We expensed $1.0
million in 2012 for the write-off of a proportional amount of unamortized debt discount and issuance costs related to
this debt that we had been amortizing over the expected life of the borrowing.
Pursuant to the terms of our 9.25% Notes, in the fourth quarter of 2013, we voluntarily redeemed the remaining
outstanding 9.25% Notes using the proceeds from the term facility and the issuance of the 5.125% Notes. This
resulted in a principal payment of $340.0 million and $18.9 million for redemption premiums, as well as payments of
accrued interest. We expensed $6.7 million in 2013 related to the write-off of the remaining unamortized debt
discount and issuance costs related to our 9.25% Notes that we had been amortizing over the expected life of the
borrowing.
7.875% NOTES In the first quarter of 2013, we voluntarily purchased and redeemed $300.0 million of our
7.875% Notes, and paid accrued interest. Upon purchase and redemption, we expensed $8.5 million related to
redemption premiums, $0.1 million of professional fees and unamortized debt issuance costs of $2.1 million related
to this debt. We had been amortizing the debt issuance costs over the expected life of the borrowing.
7.75% NOTES In 2011, we issued $200.0 million of 7.75% senior unsecured notes due 2019 (7.75% Notes).
Net proceeds from these notes were used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of certain
amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
6.625% NOTES In 2012, we issued $550.0 million of 6.625% senior unsecured notes due 2022 (6.625%
Notes). Net proceeds from the 6.625% Notes were used to fund the purchase and redemption of $250.0 million of
the outstanding 5.25% Notes, including the payment of interest, the redemption of $42.5 million aggregate principal
amount of our 9.25% Notes, certain pension obligations and for other general corporate purposes. We paid debt
issuance costs of $8.9 million related to the 6.625% Notes in 2012.
6.25% NOTES In 2013, we issued $400.0 million of 6.25% senior unsecured notes due 2021 (6.25% Notes).
Net proceeds from the 6.25% Notes were used to fund the purchase and redemption of our 7.875% Notes and for
other general corporate purposes. We paid debt issuance costs of $6.6 million in 2013 related to the 6.25% Notes.
5.125% NOTES In the fourth quarter of 2013, we issued $200.0 million of 5.125% senior unsecured notes due
2019 (5.125% Notes). Net proceeds from the 5.125% Notes were used to redeem the remaining $190.0 million
outstanding under our 9.25% Notes. We paid debt issuance costs related to the 5.125% Notes of $0.2 million and
$3.1 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Foreign credit facilities We utilize local currency credit facilities to finance the operations of certain foreign
subsidiaries. At December 31, 2014, $38.9 million was outstanding under these facilities and an additional $51.1
million was available.
29
Credit ratings To access public debt capital markets, the Company relies on credit rating agencies to assign
short-term and long-term credit ratings to our securities as an indicator of credit quality for fixed income investors. A
credit rating agency may change or withdraw its ratings based on its assessment of our current and future ability to
meet interest and principal repayment obligations. Credit ratings affect our cost of borrowing under our revolving
credit facility and may affect our access to debt capital markets and other costs to fund our business. The credit
ratings and outlook currently assigned to our securities by the rating agencies are as follows:
Standard & Poor's ........................................
Moody's Investors Services .........................
Fitch Ratings ................................................
Corporate Family
Rating
BB-
B1
BB-
Senior Unsecured
Notes Rating
B+
B2
BB-
Outlook
Stable
Stable
Stable
Dividend program We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock in 2014, 2013 or
2012.
Purchase of noncontrolling interest In 2012, we paid $4.0 million to acquire the remaining shares of e-AAM.
e-AAM, previously a JV between AAM and Saab Automobile AB, was created to design and commercialize electric
and hybrid driveline systems designed to improve fuel efficiency, reduce CO2 emissions and provide AWD capability
with the additional benefit of improved vehicle stability when compared to traditional mechanical AWD systems.
Stock repurchase In 2014, we repurchased shares of AAM common stock for $0.3 million; in 2013, we
repurchased shares of AAM common stock for $0.4 million; and in 2012, we repurchased 0.5 million shares of AAM
common stock for $5.9 million, each to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of our
restricted stock grants.
Exercise of employee stock options We received $1.2 million in 2014, $1.1 million in 2013, and $0.1 million
in 2012 related to the exercise of employee stock options.
Off-balance sheet arrangements Our off-balance sheet financing relates principally to operating leases for
machinery and equipment, commercial office and production facilities, vehicles and other assets. We lease certain
machinery and equipment under operating leases with various expiration dates. In 2013 and 2012, we entered into
various sale-leaseback transactions for $24.1 million and $12.1 million, respectively, for machinery and equipment.
Pursuant to these operating leases, we may have the option to purchase the underlying equipment on specified
dates. Remaining lease repurchase options are $17.9 million through 2017.
Contractual obligations The following table summarizes payments due on our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2014:
Current and long-term debt ........................ $
Interest obligations .....................................
Capital lease obligations ............................
Operating leases (1) ........................................
Purchase obligations (2) ..............................
Other long-term liabilities (3) ..........................
Total ........................................................... $
Payments due by period
Total
<1yr
1,531.4
$
591.5
5.0
75.0
109.8
631.3
34.8
97.0
0.4
19.9
98.8
55.5
1-3 yrs
(in millions)
35.3
$
190.0
0.9
33.6
11.0
127.7
3-5 yrs
>5 yrs
$
511.3
$
169.2
1.3
11.4
—
128.7
950.0
135.3
2.4
10.1
—
319.4
2,944.0
$
306.4
$
398.5
$
821.9
$
1,417.2
(1) Operating leases include all lease payments through the end of the contractual lease terms, which includes elections for
repurchase options and excludes any non-exercised purchase options. These commitments include machinery and
equipment, commercial office and production facilities, vehicles and other assets.
30
(2) Purchase obligations represent our obligated purchase commitments for capital expenditures and related project
expense.
(3) Other long-term liabilities represent our estimated pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, net of GM cost
sharing, that were actuarially determined through 2024, lease payments due to our continuing involvement with a building
we sold during 2014, as well as our unrecognized income tax benefits.
CYCLICALITY AND SEASONALITY
Our operations are cyclical because they are directly related to worldwide automotive production, which is itself
cyclical and dependent on general economic conditions and other factors. Our business is also moderately
seasonal as our major OEM customers historically have an extended shutdown of operations (typically 1-2 weeks)
in conjunction with their model year changeover and an approximate one-week shutdown in December. Accordingly,
our quarterly results may reflect these trends.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Although the outcome of these matters
cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will
have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental and occupational safety and health
laws, regulations and ordinances, including those regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management
and environmental cleanup. We closely monitor our environmental conditions to ensure that we are in compliance
with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. We have made, and will continue to make, capital and other
expenditures (including recurring administrative costs) to comply with environmental requirements, including
recurring administrative costs. Such expenditures were not significant in 2014, 2013 and 2012.
EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
On January 1, 2014, new accounting guidance became effective regarding financial statement presentation of
an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit
carryforward exists. The new guidance requires entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an
unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for an NOL carryforward,
a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except when one is not available as of the reporting date or the entity
does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose. This guidance does not affect the tabular
reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, as the tabular reconciliation presents the gross
amount of unrecognized tax benefits. The adoption of this new guidance has had no impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In May 2014, new accounting guidance was issued that outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use
in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition
guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The guidance is based on the principle that an entity should recognize
revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which
the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires additional
disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts,
including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract.
Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the
new standard. This guidance becomes effective for AAM at the beginning of our 2017 fiscal year and early adoption
is not permitted. We are currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
31
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
In order to prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts and disclosures in our consolidated financial statements. These estimates are subject to an
inherent degree of uncertainty and actual results could differ from our estimates.
Other items in our consolidated financial statements require estimation. In our judgment, they are not as critical
as those disclosed below. We have discussed and reviewed our critical accounting estimates disclosure with the
Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS In calculating our assets, liabilities and expenses
related to pension and OPEB, key assumptions include the discount rate, expected long-term rates of return on
plan assets and rates of increase in health care costs.
The discount rates used in the valuation of our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations were based on an actuarial
review of a hypothetical portfolio of long-term, high quality corporate bonds matched against the expected payment
stream for each of our plans. In 2014, the weighted average discount rates determined on that basis were 4.10%
for the valuation of our pension benefit obligations and 4.15% for the valuation of our OPEB obligations. The
discount rate used in the valuation of our U.K. pension obligation was based on a review of long-term bonds,
including published indices in the applicable market. In 2014, the discount rate determined on that basis was
3.70%. The expected long-term rates of return on our plan assets were 7.50% for our U.S. plans and 5.00% for our
U.K. plan in 2014. We developed these rates of return assumptions based on future capital market expectations for
the asset classes represented within our portfolio and a review of long-term historical returns. The asset allocation
for our plans was developed in consideration of the demographics of the plan participants and expected payment
stream of the liability. Our investment policy allocates approximately 30-65% of the U.S. plans' assets to equity
securities, depending on the plan, with the remainder invested in fixed income securities, hedge fund investments
and cash. The rates of increase in health care costs are based on current market conditions, inflationary
expectations and historical information.
All of our assumptions were developed in consultation with our actuarial service providers. While we believe
that we have selected reasonable assumptions for the valuation of our pension and OPEB obligations at year-end
2014, actual trends could result in materially different valuations.
The effect on our pension plans of a 0.5% decrease in both the discount rate and expected return on assets is
shown below as of December 31, 2014, our valuation date.
Decline in funded status .................................................................................... $
Increase in 2014 expense ................................................................................. $
Discount
Rate
Expected
Return on
Assets
(in millions)
51.0
1.4 $
N/A
3.3
No changes in benefit levels or in the amortization of gains or losses have been assumed. The increase in
2014 expense excludes the impact of the settlement charge.
For 2015, we assumed a weighted average annual increase in the per-capita cost of covered health care
benefits of 7.0% for OPEB. The rate is assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% by 2023 and remain at that level
thereafter. A 0.5% decrease in the discount rate for our OPEB would have decreased total expense in 2014 and
increased the postretirement obligation, net of GM cost sharing, at December 31, 2014 by $0.7 million and $25.8
million, respectively. A 1.0% increase in the assumed health care trend rate would have increased total service and
interest cost in 2014 and the postretirement obligation, net of GM cost sharing, at December 31, 2014 by $1.6
million and $41.3 million, respectively.
32
AAM and GM share in the cost of OPEB for eligible retirees proportionally based on the length of service an
employee had with AAM and GM. We estimate the future cost sharing payments and present it as an asset on our
Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2014, we estimated $287.8 million in future GM cost sharing. If,
in the future, GM were unable to fulfill this financial obligation, our OPEB obligations may be different than our
current estimates.
VALUATION OF DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND OTHER TAX LIABILITIES Because we operate in many
different geographic locations, including several foreign, state and local tax jurisdictions, the evaluation of our ability
to use all recognized deferred tax assets is complex.
We are required to estimate whether recoverability of our deferred tax assets is "more likely than not," based on
forecasts of taxable income in the related tax jurisdictions. In these estimates, we use historical results, projected
future operating results based upon approved business plans, eligible carryforward periods, tax planning
opportunities and other relevant considerations. This includes the consideration of tax law changes, prior
profitability performance and the uncertainty of future projected profitability.
Under applicable GAAP, a sustained period of profitability in our operations is required before we would change
our judgment regarding the need for a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets. In 2012, our
business returned to a position of cumulative profitability on a pre-tax basis, considering our operating results for
the three years ended December 31, 2012. We concluded that this record of cumulative profitability in recent years,
in addition to the restructuring of our U.S. operations and our long range forecast showing continued profitability,
had provided sufficient positive evidence that our net U.S. federal tax benefits more likely than not will be realized.
Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of 2012, we released the valuation allowance against our net federal deferred
assets for entities in the U.S., resulting in a $337.5 million benefit in our 2012 provision for income taxes.
As of December 31, 2014, we have a valuation allowance of approximately $156.9 million related to net
deferred tax assets in several foreign jurisdictions and U.S. state and local jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2013
and 2012, our valuation allowance was $163.7 million and $166.1 million, respectively.
If, in the future, we generate taxable income on a sustained basis in foreign and U.S. state jurisdictions for
which we have recorded valuation allowances, our current estimate of the recoverability of our deferred tax assets
could change and result in the future reversal of some or all of the valuation allowance. While we believe we have
made appropriate valuations of our deferred tax assets, unforeseen changes in tax legislation, regulatory activities,
audit results, operating results, financing strategies, organization structure and other related matters may result in
material changes in our deferred tax asset valuation allowances or our tax liabilities.
We record uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process whereby: (1) we determine whether it is
"more likely than not" that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position: and (2)
for those positions that meet the "more likely than not" recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax
benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. We
record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions in income tax expense (benefit).
As of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we have recorded a liability for unrecognized income tax benefits
and related interest and penalties of $59.5 million, $25.8 million and $30.9 million, respectively. Based on the
status of the IRS audits and audits outside the U.S., and the protocol of finalizing audits by the relevant tax
authorities, it is not possible to estimate the impact of changes, if any, to previously recorded uncertain tax
positions. Although it is not possible to predict the timing of the conclusion of all ongoing audits with certainty, we
anticipate that the current U.S. IRS audit will be completed during 2015. It is also possible that the current 2007
and 2008 audits with the Mexican tax authorities will be completed before the end of 2016. Although it is difficult to
estimate with certainty the amount of an audit settlement for the years currently under audit, we do not expect any
settlements will be materially different from what we have recorded in unrecognized tax benefits. We will continue to
monitor the progress and conclusions of all ongoing audits and will adjust our estimated liability as necessary.
33
PRODUCT WARRANTY We record a liability and related charge to cost of goods sold for estimated warranty
obligations at the dates our products are sold or when specific warranty issues are identified. Product warranties
not expected to be paid within one year are recorded as a non-current liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Our estimated warranty obligations for products sold are based on significant management estimates, with input
from our warranty, sales, engineering, quality and legal departments. For products and customers with actual
warranty payment experience, we estimate warranty costs principally based on past claims history. For certain
products and customers, actual warranty payment experience does not exist or is not mature. In these cases, we
estimate our costs based on the contractual arrangements with our customers, existing customers' warranty
program terms and internal and external warranty data, which includes a determination of our responsibility for
potential warranty issues or claims and estimates of repair costs. We actively study trends of our warranty claims
and take action to improve product quality and minimize warranty claims. We continuously evaluate these
estimates and our customers' administration of their warranty programs. We closely monitor actual warranty claim
data and adjust the liability, as necessary, on a quarterly basis.
In addition to our ordinary warranty provisions with our customers, we are also liable for product recalls and
field actions, which are recorded at the time our obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. For
warranty obligations of this nature, we bear the full responsibility of these costs. We recorded $2.3 million and $9.9
million of expense in 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to a specific field action with our largest customer.
Our warranty accrual, including both our ordinary warranty and specific field action accruals, was $12.4 million
as of December 31, 2014 and $14.3 million as of December 31, 2013. In 2013, we made warranty payments of
$12.3 million, of which $11.3 million related to the field action. During 2014 and 2013, we also made adjustments to
our warranty accrual to reflect revised estimates regarding our projected future warranty obligations. Actual
experience could differ from the amounts estimated requiring adjustments to these liabilities in future periods. It is
possible that changes in our assumptions or future warranty issues could materially affect our financial position and
results of operations.
GOODWILL We record goodwill when the purchase price of acquired businesses exceeds the value of their
identifiable net tangible and intangible assets acquired. We periodically evaluate goodwill for impairment in
accordance with the accounting guidance for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles that are not amortized.
We review our goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter. In addition, we review goodwill for
impairment whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment. This review
utilizes a two-step impairment test which is performed at a consolidated level, as AAM has a single reporting unit.
The first step involves a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including
goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not
considered impaired and thus the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of the
reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the process involves a measurement and comparison of the
fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the fair
value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
The determination of our reporting unit and impairment indicators require us to make significant judgments. In
order to approximate the fair value of our reporting unit for purposes of testing recoverability, we use the total
market capitalization of AAM, a market approach, which is then compared to the total carrying amount of AAM.
Under the market approach, the fair value is based on observed market prices. We performed our annual
impairment test in the fourth quarter and determined there was no impairment to goodwill in 2014.
34
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS Long-lived assets, excluding goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets, to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever adverse events or changes in
circumstances indicate a possible impairment. Recoverability of each “held for use” asset group affected by
impairment indicators is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted cash flows of the operations to
which the assets relate to their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds the
undiscounted cash flows and is therefore nonrecoverable, the assets in this group are written down to their
estimated fair value. We estimate fair value based on market prices, when available, or on a discounted cash flow
analysis. Long-lived assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to
sell. Significant judgments and estimates used by management when evaluating long-lived assets for impairment
include:
• An assessment as to whether an adverse event or circumstance has triggered the need for an impairment
review;
• Determination of asset groups, the primary asset within each group, and the primary asset's average
estimated useful life;
• Undiscounted future cash flows generated by the assets; and
• Determination of fair value when an impairment is deemed to exist, which may require assumptions related to
future general economic conditions, future expected production volumes, product pricing and cost estimates,
working capital and capital investment requirements, discount rates and estimated liquidation values.
In 2012, we recorded asset impairment charges of $5.8 million related to previously purchased lease buyouts of
equipment that we no longer expect to use in our operations.
ESTIMATED USEFUL LIVES FOR DEPRECIATION At December 31, 2014, approximately 80% of our
capitalized investment in property, plant and equipment was related to productive machinery and equipment used in
support of our manufacturing operations. The selection of appropriate useful life estimates for such machinery and
equipment is a critical element of our ability to properly match the cost of such assets with the operating profits and
cash flow generated by their use. We currently depreciate productive machinery and equipment on the straight-line
method using composite useful life estimates up to 12 years.
While we believe that the useful life estimates currently being used for depreciation purposes reasonably
approximate the period of time we will use such assets in our operations, unforeseen changes in product design
and technology standards or cost, quality and delivery requirements may result in actual useful lives that differ
materially from the current estimates.
35
Forward-Looking Statements
In this MD&A and elsewhere in this Annual Report, we make statements concerning our expectations, beliefs, plans,
objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or performance. Such statements are “forward-looking” statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and relate to trends and events that may affect our
future financial position and operating results. The terms such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “believe,” “expect,”
“anticipate,” “intend,” “project,” "target," and similar words or expressions, as well as statements in future tense, are
intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be
accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements
are based on information available at the time those statements are made and/or management’s good faith belief as of that
time with respect to future events and are subject to risks and may differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by
the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:
• reduced purchases of our products by General Motors Company (GM), FCA US LLC, formerly known as Chrysler
Group LLC (Chrysler), or other customers;
• reduced demand for our customers' products (particularly light trucks and sport utility vehicles (SUVs) produced by
GM and Chrysler);
• our ability to develop and produce new products that reflect market demand;
• lower-than-anticipated market acceptance of new or existing products;
• our ability to attract new customers and programs for new products;
• our ability to respond to changes in technology, increased competition or pricing pressures;
• our ability to achieve the level of cost reductions required to sustain global cost competitiveness;
• supply shortages or price increases in raw materials, utilities or other operating supplies for us or our customers as
a result of natural disasters or otherwise;
• our ability to successfully implement upgrades to our enterprise resource planning systems;
• global economic conditions;
• risks inherent in our international operations (including adverse changes in political stability, taxes and other law
changes, potential disruptions of production and supply, and currency rate fluctuations);
• liabilities arising from warranty claims, product recall or field actions, product liability and legal proceedings to which
we are or may become a party, or the impact of product recall or field actions on our customers;
• our ability to maintain satisfactory labor relations and avoid work stoppages;
• our suppliers', our customers' and their suppliers' ability to maintain satisfactory labor relations and avoid work
stoppages;
• our ability or our customers' and suppliers' ability to successfully launch new product programs on a timely basis;
• our ability to realize the expected revenues from our new and incremental business backlog;
• negative or unexpected tax consequences;
• price volatility in, or reduced availability of, fuel;
• our ability to consummate and integrate acquisitions and joint ventures;
• our ability to attract and retain key associates;
• our ability to protect our intellectual property and successfully defend against assertions made against us;
• availability of financing for working capital, capital expenditures, research and development (R&D) or other general
corporate purposes including acquisitions, as well as our ability to comply with financial covenants;
• our customers' and suppliers' availability of financing for working capital, capital expenditures, R&D or other general
corporate purposes;
• changes in liabilities arising from pension and other postretirement benefit obligations;
• risks of noncompliance with environmental laws and regulations or risks of environmental issues that could result in
unforeseen costs at our facilities;
• adverse changes in laws, government regulations or market conditions affecting our products or our customers'
products (such as the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations);
• our ability or our customers' and suppliers' ability to comply with the Dodd-Frank Act and other regulatory
requirements and the potential costs of such compliance; and
• other unanticipated events and conditions that may hinder our ability to compete.
It is not possible to foresee or identify all such factors and we make no commitment to update any forward-looking
statement or to disclose any facts, events or circumstances after the date hereof that may affect the accuracy of any
forward-looking statement.
36
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
MARKET RISK
Our business and financial results are affected by fluctuations in world financial markets, including interest rates
and currency exchange rates. Our hedging policy has been developed to manage these risks to an acceptable
level based on management's judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost. We do not
hold financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
CURRENCY EXCHANGE RISK From time to time, we use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the
effects of fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily relating to the Mexican Peso, Euro, Swedish Krona, Polish Zloty
and Pound Sterling. At December 31, 2014, we had forward contracts with a notional amount of $99.3 million
outstanding. The potential decrease in fair value of foreign exchange contracts, assuming a 10% adverse change
in the foreign currency exchange rates, would be approximately $9.0 million and $6.1 million at December 31, 2014
and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Future business operations and opportunities, including the expansion of our business outside North America,
may further increase the risk that cash flows resulting from these activities may be adversely affected by changes in
currency exchange rates. If and when appropriate, we intend to manage these risks by utilizing local currency
funding of these expansions and various types of foreign exchange contracts.
INTEREST RATE RISK We are exposed to variable interest rates on certain credit facilities. From time to
time, we have used interest rate hedging to reduce the effects of fluctuations in market interest rates. As of
December 31, 2014, there are no interest rate swaps in place. The pre-tax earnings and cash flow impact of a one-
percentage-point increase in interest rates (approximately 16% of our weighted-average interest rate at
December 31, 2014) on our long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 would be
approximately $1.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively, on an annualized basis.
37
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Consolidated Statements of Income
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions, except per share data)
2012
Net sales ....................................................................................... $
3,696.0 $
3,207.3 $
2,930.9
Cost of goods sold .........................................................................
3,173.2
2,728.6
2,531.2
Gross profit ....................................................................................
Selling, general and administrative expenses ...............................
Operating income ..........................................................................
522.8
255.2
267.6
478.7
238.4
240.3
399.7
243.3
156.4
Interest expense ............................................................................
(99.9)
(115.9)
(101.6)
Investment income ........................................................................
Other income (expense)
Debt refinancing and redemption costs .....................................
Other, net ..................................................................................
2.1
—
6.9
Income before income taxes .........................................................
176.7
0.6
0.6
(36.8)
(1.9)
86.3
(19.8)
(4.1)
31.5
Income tax expense (benefit) ........................................................
33.7
(8.2)
(335.2)
Net income .................................................................................... $
143.0 $
94.5 $
366.7
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests .............................
—
—
1.0
Net income attributable to AAM ..................................................... $
143.0 $
94.5 $
367.7
Basic earnings per share ............................................................... $
1.85 $
1.23 $
Diluted earnings per share ............................................................ $
1.85 $
1.23 $
4.88
4.87
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
38
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
(in millions)
Net income ................................................................................................. $
143.0 $
94.5 $
366.7
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Defined benefit plans, net of $23.2 million, $(41.3) million and $32.3
million of tax in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively ...............................
Foreign currency translation adjustments ..............................................
Change in derivatives ............................................................................
Other comprehensive income (loss) ...........................................................
(42.7)
(30.3)
(7.7)
(80.7)
76.6
(26.2)
(2.0)
48.4
(58.9)
(9.4)
7.8
(60.5)
Comprehensive income ..............................................................................
62.3
142.9
306.2
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests .....................................
Foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling
interests .................................................................................................
—
—
—
—
1.0
0.3
Comprehensive income attributable to AAM............................................... $
62.3 $
142.9 $
306.9
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
39
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions, except per share data)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents ................................................................................... $
Accounts receivable, net .......................................................................................
Inventories, net .....................................................................................................
Deferred income taxes ..........................................................................................
Prepaid expenses and other .................................................................................
Total current assets ..................................................................................................
Property, plant and equipment, net ..........................................................................
Deferred income taxes .............................................................................................
Goodwill ...................................................................................................................
GM postretirement cost sharing asset .....................................................................
Other assets and deferred charges ..........................................................................
Total assets .............................................................................................................. $
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt .......................................................................... $
Accounts payable ..................................................................................................
Accrued compensation and benefits .....................................................................
Deferred revenue ..................................................................................................
Deferred income taxes ..........................................................................................
Other accrued expenses .......................................................................................
Total current liabilities ...............................................................................................
Long-term debt .........................................................................................................
Deferred income taxes .............................................................................................
Deferred revenue .....................................................................................................
Postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities .............................................
Total liabilities ...........................................................................................................
Stockholders' equity
Series A junior participating preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share;
0.1 million shares authorized; no shares outstanding in 2014 or 2013 ................
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 10.0 million shares
authorized; no shares outstanding in 2014 or 2013 .............................................
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 150.0 million shares authorized;
81.9 million and 81.6 million shares issued as of December 31, 2014 and
2013, respectively ................................................................................................
Series common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 40.0 million
shares authorized; no shares outstanding in 2014 or 2013 .................................
Paid-in capital ........................................................................................................
Accumulated deficit ................................................................................................
Treasury stock at cost, 6.1 million shares in 2014 and 6.0 million shares in 2013
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Defined benefit plans ..........................................................................................
Foreign currency translation adjustments ...........................................................
Unrecognized gain (loss) on derivatives .............................................................
Total AAM stockholders' equity ................................................................................
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries ...............................................................
Total stockholders' equity .........................................................................................
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.................................................................... $
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
40
249.2 $
532.7
248.8
40.2
68.6
1,139.5
1,061.1
368.8
155.0
274.5
260.3
3,259.2 $
13.0 $
444.3
109.1
22.1
0.1
98.6
687.2
1,523.4
9.1
94.2
831.9
3,145.8
—
—
0.8
—
623.7
(31.4)
(182.8)
(240.6)
(48.9)
(7.4)
113.4
—
113.4
3,259.2 $
154.0
458.5
261.8
34.9
87.1
996.3
1,058.5
341.8
156.4
242.0
232.5
3,027.5
—
437.4
110.1
17.0
0.1
94.1
658.7
1,559.1
9.8
76.4
683.0
2,987.0
—
—
0.8
—
612.8
(174.4)
(182.5)
(197.9)
(18.6)
0.3
40.5
—
40.5
3,027.5
2014
2013
(in millions)
2012
143.0
$
94.5
$
366.7
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31,
Operating Activities
Net income .................................................................................................... $
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
Asset impairments and related indirect inventory obsolescence ..................
Depreciation and amortization .....................................................................
Deferred income taxes ................................................................................
Stock-based compensation .........................................................................
Pensions and other postretirement benefits, net of contributions .................
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment, net ...............................
Debt refinancing and redemption costs ........................................................
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable ..................................................................................
Inventories ................................................................................................
Accounts payable and accrued expenses .................................................
Deferred revenue ......................................................................................
Other assets and liabilities ........................................................................
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ........................................
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment ..................................................
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment ....................................
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of equipment .................................................
Proceeds from government grants .................................................................
Net cash used in investing activities ...............................................................
Financing activities
Net short-term borrowings (repayments) under credit facilities .......................
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and other .....................................
Payments of other long-term debt, capital lease obligations and other...........
Debt issuance costs .......................................................................................
Purchase of noncontrolling interest ................................................................
Employee stock option exercises, including tax benefit ..................................
Purchase of treasury stock .............................................................................
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities .........................................
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash ......................................................
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ..................................
—
199.9
(9.2)
9.7
31.8
(2.6)
—
(78.3)
10.9
13.7
24.5
(25.0)
318.4
(206.5)
9.1
—
2.1
(195.3)
—
5.0
(27.0)
(0.3)
—
1.2
(0.3)
(21.4)
(6.5)
95.2
—
177.0
(18.7)
10.8
6.5
(3.5)
9.2
(0.3)
(42.5)
66.3
(5.6)
(70.7)
223.0
(251.9)
9.1
24.1
—
(218.7)
(29.9)
786.7
(652.0)
(16.7)
—
1.1
(0.4)
88.8
(1.5)
91.6
62.4
5.8
152.2
(343.8)
2.4
(208.4)
(1.9)
1.5
(130.6)
(49.9)
60.9
(21.6)
(8.8)
(175.5)
(207.6)
10.1
12.1
—
(185.4)
10.4
562.6
(299.1)
(10.6)
(4.0)
0.1
(5.9)
253.5
0.6
(106.8)
169.2
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ............................................
154.0
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ..................................................... $
249.2
$
154.0
$
62.4
Supplemental cash flow information
Interest paid .............................................................................................. $
.............................................................................. $
Income taxes paid, net
91.1
11.3
$
$
123.2
11.6
$
$
88.9
14.7
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
41
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Common Stock
Income (Loss) Noncontrolling
Shares
Par
Paid-in
Accumulated
Treasury
Attributable to
Interests in
Outstanding
Value
Capital
Deficit
Stock
AAM
Subsidiaries
(in millions)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Balance at January 1, 2012, as
revised (see Note 1) .......................
Net income .......................................
Change in derivatives .......................
Foreign currency translation .............
Defined benefit plans, net.................
Exercise of stock options and
vesting of restricted stock .................
Stock-based compensation ..............
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest
Purchase of treasury stock ...............
Balance at December 31, 2012 ......
Net income .......................................
Change in derivatives .......................
Foreign currency translation .............
Defined benefit plans, net.................
Exercise of stock options and
vesting of restricted stock .................
Stock-based compensation ..............
Purchase of treasury stock ...............
Balance at December 31, 2013 ......
Net income .......................................
Change in derivatives .......................
Foreign currency translation .............
Defined benefit plans, net.................
Exercise of stock options and
vesting of restricted stock .................
Stock-based compensation ..............
Purchase of treasury stock ...............
Balance at December 31, 2014 ......
73.8 $
0.8 $
597.2 $
(636.6) $
(176.2) $
(203.8) $
367.7
0.1
2.4
1.2
0.8
600.9
(268.9)
(5.9)
(182.1)
94.5
1.1
10.8
7.8
(9.7)
(58.9)
(264.6)
(2.0)
(26.2)
76.6
1.5
(0.5)
74.8
0.8
—
75.6 $
0.8 $
612.8 $
(174.4) $
143.0
(0.4)
(182.5) $
(216.2) $
(7.7)
(30.3)
(42.7)
5.9
(1.0)
0.3
(5.2)
—
—
—
—
0.2
—
1.2
9.7
75.8 $
0.8 $
623.7 $
(31.4) $
(0.3)
(182.8) $
(296.9) $
—
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
42
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
ORGANIZATION American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) and its subsidiaries (collectively,
we, our, us or AAM) is a Tier I supplier to the automotive industry. We manufacture, engineer, design and validate
driveline and drivetrain systems and related components and chassis modules for light trucks, sport utility vehicles
(SUVs), passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles. Driveline and drivetrain systems include
components that transfer power from the transmission and deliver it to the drive wheels. Our driveline, drivetrain
and related products include axles, chassis modules, driveshafts, power transfer units, transfer cases, chassis and
steering components, driveheads, transmission parts, electric drive systems and metal-formed products. In addition
to locations in the United States (U.S.) (Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania), we also have offices or facilities
in Brazil, China, Germany, India, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Poland, Scotland, South Korea, Sweden and
Thailand.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION We include the accounts of Holdings and its subsidiaries in our
consolidated financial statements. We eliminate the effects of all intercompany transactions, balances and profits in
our consolidation.
REVISION OF PRIOR PERIOD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In connection with the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, we determined that entries recorded in
the third quarter of 2014 to reduce certain accrued accounts payable balances by $8.4 million were previously
recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold but should have been recorded as an adjustment to opening
accumulated deficit because the amounts giving rise to the correction originated in periods prior to January 1, 2012.
In accordance with ASC 250 Accounting Changes and Error Corrections as well as the SEC's Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 99, Materiality, we evaluated the materiality of this error on prior period financial statements and
determined that it did not result in a material misstatement to the financial conditions, results of operations, or cash
flows for any of the periods presented.
We also determined that the effect of recording the correction during the third quarter of 2014 was material to
the financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2014. As a result, prior period financial
statements have been revised in accordance with ASC 250 and the SEC's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements, and accumulated deficit at January 1, 2012 was reduced by $6.9 million. Consequently, the previously
reported December 31, 2013 balances for accounts payable of $445.8 million, accumulated deficit of $181.3 million
and current deferred income tax assets of $36.4 million were reduced by $8.4 million, $6.9 million and $1.5 million,
respectively.
REVENUE RECOGNITION We recognize revenue when products are shipped to our customers and title
transfers under standard commercial terms or when realizable in accordance with our commercial agreements. If
we are uncertain as to whether we will be successful collecting a balance in accordance with our understanding of a
commercial agreement, we do not recognize the revenue or cost recovery until such time as the uncertainty is
removed.
In the first quarter of 2014, we reached an agreement with General Motors Company (GM) to increase installed
capacity and adjust product mix for our largest vehicle program. As a result of this agreement, we received $32.8
million in 2014 and recorded the payments as deferred revenue. We will recognize this deferred revenue into sales
over the life of the program on a straight line basis over approximately 5 years, which is the period we expect GM to
benefit from this capacity and mix change. In 2014, we recognized revenue of $5.4 million related to this
agreement. As of December 31, 2014, we have $6.9 million of deferred revenue that is classified as a current
liability and $20.5 million of deferred revenue that is recorded as a noncurrent liability on our Consolidated Balance
Sheet.
43
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Also in the first quarter of 2014, we reached an agreement with GM to recover certain costs related to the delay
of another major product program. We received $9.3 million in 2014 related to this agreement and initially recorded
deferred revenue of $9.3 million. We will recognize this deferred revenue into sales over the life of the program on
a straight-line basis over approximately 8 years, which is the period we expect GM to benefit from this agreement.
We began recognizing this deferred revenue as revenue in the third quarter of 2014 when this program launched in
certain markets. In 2014, we recognized revenue of $0.5 million related to this agreement. As of December 31,
2014, we have recorded deferred revenue of $8.8 million, $1.1 million of which is classified as a current liability and
$7.7 million which is recorded as a noncurrent liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In 2009, we entered into a settlement and commercial agreement (2009 Settlement and Commercial
Agreement) with General Motors Company (GM). As part of this agreement, we received $110.0 million from GM,
of which we recorded $79.7 million as deferred revenue. As of December 31, 2014, our deferred revenue related to
the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement is $37.5 million, $8.0 million of which is classified as a current
liability and $29.5 million of which is recorded as a noncurrent liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We
recognize this deferred revenue into revenue on a straight-line basis over 120 months, which ends September 2019
and is the period that we expect GM to benefit under the 2009 Settlement and Commercial Agreement. We
recognized revenue of $8.0 million, in 2014, 2013 and 2012 related to this agreement.
As of December 31, 2014, the majority of the remaining deferred revenue primarily relates to customer
payments to implement capacity programs, which is generally recognized into revenue over the life of these
programs. We recognized $7.5 million, $10.5 million and $13.1 million of revenue for these programs in 2014, 2013
and 2012, respectively.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D) COSTS We expense R&D, as incurred, in selling, general and
administrative expenses on our Consolidated Statement of Income. R&D spending, net of engineering, design and
development recoveries, was $103.9 million, $103.4 million and $123.4 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012,
respectively.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid
investments in money market funds with maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE The majority of our accounts receivable are due from original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) in the automotive industry and are past due when payment is not received within the stated
terms. Trade accounts receivable for our largest customer, GM, are generally due within approximately 50 days
from the date of receipt.
Amounts due from customers are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts. We determine our allowances
by considering factors such as the length of time accounts are past due, our previous loss history, the customer's
ability to pay its obligation to us, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The
allowance for doubtful accounts was $4.6 million and $4.9 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
We write-off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible.
CUSTOMER TOOLING AND PRE-PRODUCTION COSTS RELATED TO LONG-TERM SUPPLY
AGREEMENTS Engineering, R&D, and other pre-production design and development costs for products sold on
long-term supply arrangements are expensed as incurred unless we have a contractual guarantee for
reimbursement from the customer. Costs for tooling used to make products sold on long-term supply arrangements
for which we have either title to the assets or the noncancelable right to use the assets during the term of the supply
arrangement are capitalized in property, plant and equipment. Capitalized items and customer receipts in excess of
tooling costs specifically related to a supply arrangement are amortized over the shorter of the term of the
arrangement or over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.
44
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
INVENTORIES We state our inventories at the lower of cost or market. The cost of our inventories is
determined using the FIFO method. When we determine that our gross inventories exceed usage requirements, or
if inventories become obsolete or otherwise not saleable, we record a provision for such loss as a component of our
inventory accounts.
Inventories consist of the following:
Raw materials and work-in-progress ................................................................ $
Finished goods .................................................................................................
Gross inventories ..............................................................................................
Inventory valuation reserves .............................................................................
Inventories, net ................................................................................................. $
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
243.8 $
32.9
276.7
(27.9)
248.8 $
263.4
25.7
289.1
(27.3)
261.8
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT We state property, plant and equipment, including amortizable tooling,
at historical cost, as adjusted for impairments. Construction in progress includes costs incurred for the construction
of buildings and building improvements, and machinery and equipment in process. Repair and maintenance costs
that do not extend the useful life or otherwise improve the utility of the asset beyond its existing useful state are
expensed in the period incurred.
We record depreciation and tooling amortization on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the depreciable assets. Depreciation and tooling amortization amounted to $166.5 million, $151.8 million and
$130.9 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:
Estimated
Useful Lives
(years)
Land ....................................................................................................
Land improvements ............................................................................
Buildings and building improvements ..................................................
Machinery and equipment ...................................................................
Construction in progress .....................................................................
10-15
15-40
3-12
December 31,
2014
2013
$
(in millions)
26.2 $
19.0
314.3
1,770.7
91.4
2,221.6
29.5
18.9
306.6
1,648.6
95.1
2,098.7
Accumulated depreciation and amortization .......................................
Property, plant and equipment, net .....................................................
(1,160.5)
1,061.1 $
(1,040.2)
1,058.5
$
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS When impairment indicators exist, we evaluate the carrying value of
long-lived assets for potential impairment. We consider projected future undiscounted cash flows, trends and other
circumstances in making such estimates and evaluations. If impairment is deemed to exist, the carrying amount of
the asset is adjusted based on its fair value. Recoverability of assets “held for use” is determined by comparing the
forecasted undiscounted cash flows of the operations to which the assets relate to their carrying amount. When the
carrying value of an asset group exceeds its fair value and is therefore nonrecoverable, those assets are written
down to fair value. Fair value is determined based on market prices, when available, or a discounted cash flow
analysis performed using management estimates.
45
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
GOODWILL We record goodwill when the purchase price of acquired businesses exceeds the value of their
identifiable net tangible and intangible assets acquired. We periodically evaluate goodwill for impairment in
accordance with the accounting guidance for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles. We completed
impairment tests in 2014 and 2013 and concluded that there was no impairment of our goodwill. The following table
provides a reconciliation of changes in goodwill:
Beginning balance ............................................................................................. $
Foreign currency translation ...............................................................................
Ending balance ................................................................................................... $
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
156.4 $
(1.4)
155.0 $
156.4
—
156.4
INTANGIBLE ASSETS We are currently in the process of testing, validating and launching global enterprise
resource planning (ERP) systems, at certain key locations, to upgrade many of our existing operating and financial
systems. In connection with the development of these ERP systems, we have recorded an intangible asset of
$19.2 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014. The intangible asset is related to costs
incurred to obtain software licenses from a third party, as well as costs to design and develop this internal-use
software. We incurred and capitalized $11.4 million and $7.8 million of these costs in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
This intangible asset is classified as other assets and deferred charges on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and will
be amortized over the estimated useful life of our ERP systems. We recorded $0.4 million and $0.1 million of
expense for the amortization of these intangible assets in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In connection with our e-AAM subsidiary, we have in-process research and development intangible assets
which represent the technology that will be utilized in products to be launched in 2016. Accordingly, we will begin
amortizing this asset on a straight-line basis at the start of production through the expected life cycle of the related
products, which is expected to be approximately 5-7 years. These intangible assets are classified as other assets
and deferred charges on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The following table provides a reconciliation of changes
in the carrying value of our in-process research and development intangible assets:
Beginning balance ............................................................................................. $
Foreign currency translation ..............................................................................
Ending balance .................................................................................................. $
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
7.4 $
(1.2)
6.2 $
7.4
—
7.4
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS The costs related to the issuance or modification of long-term debt are deferred and
amortized into interest expense over the life of each debt issue. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013,
our unamortized debt issuance costs were $29.5 million and $35.6 million, respectively. Deferred amounts
associated with the extinguishment of debt are expensed and classified as debt refinancing and redemption costs
on our Consolidated Statement of Income.
DERIVATIVES We recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value and we are not subject to a
master netting agreement. If a derivative qualifies under the accounting guidance as a hedge, depending on the
nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are either offset against the change in fair value of
the hedged asset, liability or firm commitment through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until
the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value, and
changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify as hedges, are immediately recognized in earnings. See
Note 3 - Derivatives and Risk Management, for more detail on our derivatives.
CURRENCY TRANSLATION We translate the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries to U.S. dollars
at end-of-period exchange rates. We translate the income statement elements of our foreign subsidiaries to U.S.
dollars at average-period exchange rates. We report the effect of translation for our foreign subsidiaries that use
the local currency as their functional currency as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Gains and losses
46
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
resulting from the remeasurement of assets and liabilities in a currency other than the functional currency of a
subsidiary are reported in current period income. We also report any gains and losses arising from transactions
denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of a subsidiary in current period income. These
foreign currency gains and losses resulted in a gain of $6.4 million and losses of $4.2 million and $6.3 million, for
the years ended 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
USE OF ESTIMATES In order to prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), we are required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in our consolidated financial statements. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS On January 1, 2014, new accounting guidance became
effective regarding financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss (NOL)
carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The new guidance requires entities to present an
unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a
deferred tax asset for an NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except when one is not
available as of the reporting date or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose. This
guidance does not affect the tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, as the tabular
reconciliation presents the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits. The adoption of this new guidance has had
no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, new accounting guidance was issued that outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use
in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition
guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The guidance is based on the principle that an entity should recognize
revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which
the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires additional
disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts,
including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract.
Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the
new standard. This guidance becomes effective for AAM at the beginning of our 2017 fiscal year and early adoption
is not permitted. We are currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
2. LONG-TERM DEBT AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS
Long-term debt consists of the following:
December 31,
2014
2013
Revolving Credit Facility ............................................................................ $
Term Facility ..............................................................................................
7.75% Notes ..............................................................................................
6.625% Notes ............................................................................................
6.25% Notes ..............................................................................................
5.125% Notes ............................................................................................
Foreign credit facilities ...............................................................................
Capital lease obligations ............................................................................
Debt ...........................................................................................................
Less: Current portion of long-term debt .................................................
(in millions)
— $
142.5
200.0
550.0
400.0
200.0
38.9
5.0
1,536.4
13.0
Long-term debt .......................................................................................... $
1,523.4 $
—
150.0
200.0
550.0
400.0
200.0
53.8
5.3
1,559.1
—
1,559.1
47
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AND TERM FACILITY As of December 31, 2014, the revolving credit facility
provided up to $523.5 million of revolving bank financing commitments through September 13, 2018. At
December 31, 2014, $505.5 million was available under the revolving credit facility, which reflected a reduction of
$18.0 million for standby letters of credit issued against the facility.
The credit agreement provides for a senior secured term loan A facility in an aggregate principal amount of
$150.0 million (term facility). During 2014, we made principal payments of $7.5 million on our term facility. We paid
remaining debt issuance costs of $0.1 million in 2014 associated with the execution of amending our revolving
credit facility and term facility. In 2013 and 2012, we paid debt issuance costs of $6.9 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, associated with the amendments and restatements of our revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the revolving credit facility and term facility bear interest at rates based on adjusted LIBOR or
an alternate base rate, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for LIBOR-based loans will be between
1.5% and 3.0%.
In the event AAM achieves investment grade corporate credit ratings from S&P and Moody's, AAM may elect to
release all of the collateral from the liens granted pursuant to the collateral agreement, subject to notice
requirements and other conditions. The revolving credit facility and term facility are secured on a first priority basis
by all or substantially all of the assets of AAM and each guarantor under the collateral agreement dated as of
November 7, 2008, as amended and restated as of September 13, 2013. The revolving credit facility limits our
ability to make certain investments, loans and guarantees, declare dividends or distributions on capital stock,
redeem or repurchase capital stock and certain debt obligations, incur liens, incur indebtedness, enter into certain
restrictive agreements, merge, make acquisitions or sell all or substantially all of our assets.
The revolving credit facility provides back-up liquidity for our foreign credit facilities. We intend to use the
availability of long-term financing under the revolving credit facility to refinance any current maturities related to
such debt agreements that are not otherwise refinanced on a long-term basis in their local markets, except where
otherwise reclassified to current portion of long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In the first quarter of 2013, we terminated our class C loan facility of $72.8 million, which would have matured
on June 30, 2013. Upon termination, we expensed $0.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the
class C facility. We had been amortizing the debt issuance costs over the expected life of the borrowing.
9.25% NOTES In 2009, we issued $425.0 million of 9.25% senior secured notes due 2017 (9.25% Notes). The
notes were issued at a discount of $5.5 million. Net proceeds from these notes were used for the repayment of
certain indebtedness.
In 2012, we elected to exercise an option to redeem 10% of the original amount of our 9.25% Notes
outstanding at a redemption price of 103% of the principal amount. This resulted in principal payments of $42.5
million and $1.3 million for the redemption premium, as well as payments of accrued interest in both 2012. We
expensed $1.0 million in 2012 for the write-off of a proportional amount of unamortized debt discount and issuance
costs related to this debt that we had been amortizing over the expected life of the borrowing.
Pursuant to the terms of our 9.25% Notes, in the fourth quarter of 2013, we voluntarily redeemed the remaining
outstanding 9.25% Notes using the proceeds from the Term Facility and the issuance of the 5.125% Notes. This
resulted in a principal payment of $340.0 million and $18.9 million for redemption premiums, as well as payments of
accrued interest. We expensed $6.7 million in 2013 related to the write-off of the remaining unamortized debt
discount and issuance costs related to our 9.25% Notes that we had been amortizing over the expected life of the
borrowing.
7.875% NOTES In 2007, we issued $300.0 million of 7.875% senior unsecured notes due 2017 (7.875%
Notes). Net proceeds from these notes were used for general corporate purposes, including payment of amounts
outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
In the first quarter of 2013, we voluntarily purchased and redeemed $300.0 million of our 7.875% Notes, and
paid accrued interest. Upon purchase and redemption, we expensed $8.5 million related to redemption premiums,
$0.1 million of professional fees and unamortized debt issuance costs of $2.1 million related to this debt. We had
been amortizing the debt issuance costs over the expected life of the borrowing.
48
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7.75% NOTES In 2011, we issued $200.0 million of 7.75% senior unsecured notes due 2019 (7.75% Notes).
Net proceeds from these notes were used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of certain
amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
6.625% NOTES In 2012, we issued $550.0 million of 6.625% senior unsecured notes due 2022 (6.625%
Notes). Net proceeds from the 6.625% Notes were used to fund the purchase and redemption of $250.0 million of
the outstanding 5.25% senior unsecured notes, including the payment of interest, the redemption of $42.5 million
aggregate principal amount of our 9.25% Notes, certain pension obligations and for other general corporate
purposes. We paid debt issuance costs of $8.9 million related to the 6.625% Notes in 2012.
6.25% NOTES In 2013, we issued $400.0 million of 6.25% senior unsecured notes due 2021 (6.25% Notes).
Net proceeds from the 6.25% Notes were used to fund the purchase and redemption of our 7.875% Notes and for
other general corporate purposes. We paid debt issuance costs of $6.6 million in 2013 related to the 6.25% Notes.
5.125% NOTES In the fourth quarter of 2013, we issued $200.0 million of 5.125% senior unsecured notes due
2019 (5.125% Notes). Net proceeds from the 5.125% Notes were used to redeem the remaining $190.0 million
outstanding under our 9.25% Notes. We paid debt issuance costs related to the 5.125% Notes of $0.2 million and
$3.1 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
LEASES We lease certain facilities under capital leases expiring at various dates. The gross asset cost of our
capital lease was $6.7 million at both December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The net book value included in
property, plant and equipment, net on the balance sheet was $5.0 million and $5.3 million at December 31, 2014
and 2013, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on this capital lease obligation at December 31, 2014
was 8.9%.
We also lease certain manufacturing machinery and equipment, commercial office and production facilities,
vehicles and other assets under operating leases expiring at various dates. In 2013 and 2012, we entered into
various sale-leaseback transactions for equipment to be used in production starting in 2013. We received proceeds
of $24.1 million and $12.1 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, as a result of these transactions. Future minimum
payments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows: $19.9 million in 2015, $18.5 million in 2016, $15.1
million in 2017, $7.9 million in 2018, and $3.5 million in 2019. Our total expense relating to operating leases was
$23.6 million, $17.6 million and $9.0 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
FOREIGN CREDIT FACILITIES We utilize local currency credit facilities to finance the operations of certain
foreign subsidiaries. These credit facilities, some of which are guaranteed by Holdings and/or AAM, Inc., expire at
various dates through July 2019. At December 31, 2014, $38.9 million was outstanding under these facilities and
an additional $51.1 million was available.
DEBT MATURITIES Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in millions):
2015 ................................................................................................................................................ $
2016 ................................................................................................................................................
2017 ................................................................................................................................................
2018 ................................................................................................................................................
2019 ................................................................................................................................................
Thereafter .......................................................................................................................................
Total ................................................................................................................................................ $
35.2
17.1
19.1
109.2
403.4
952.4
1,536.4
INTEREST EXPENSE AND INVESTMENT INCOME Interest expense was $99.9 million in 2014, $115.9
million in 2013 and $101.6 million in 2012. The decrease in interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 is
primarily due to the decrease in our weighted-average interest rate for the full year 2014 as compared to full year
2013. The decrease is also driven by lower average outstanding borrowings in 2014 as compared to 2013. The
increase in interest expense in 2013 as compared to 2012 reflects higher average outstanding borrowings, during
those comparable periods.
49
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
We capitalized interest of $5.8 million in 2014, $6.6 million in 2013 and $8.2 million in 2012. The weighted-
average interest rate of our long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2014 was 6.4% as compared to 6.3% and
7.9% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Investment income was $2.1 million in 2014 as compared to $0.6 million in both 2013 and 2012. Investment
income includes interest and dividends earned on cash and cash equivalents and realized and unrealized gains
and losses on our short-term investments during the period.
3. DERIVATIVES AND RISK MANAGEMENT
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk
associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage a portion of these
inherent risks, we may purchase certain types of derivative financial instruments based on management's judgment
of the trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for
trading or speculative purposes. The ineffective portion of any hedge is included in current earnings. The impact of
hedge ineffectiveness was not significant in any of the periods presented.
CURRENCY FORWARD CONTRACTS From time to time, we use foreign currency forward contracts to
reduce the effects of fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily relating to the Mexican Peso, Euro, Swedish Krona,
Polish Zloty and Pound Sterling. We had forward contracts with a notional amount of $99.3 million and $67.2
million outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, that hedge our exposure to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates for our payroll expenses, indirect inventory and other working capital items.
The following table summarizes the reclassification of pre-tax derivative gains (losses) into net income from
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Location of Gain
Reclassified into
Net Income
Gain Reclassified During
the Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
Loss Expected to
be Reclassified
During the Next
12 Months
(in millions)
Currency forward contracts .................... Cost of Goods Sold
$
0.9 $
2.8 $
(7.2)
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK In the normal course of business, we provide credit to customers.
We periodically evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers and we maintain reserves for potential credit losses.
Sales to GM were approximately 68% of our consolidated net sales in 2014, 71% in 2013, and 73% in 2012 .
Accounts and other receivables due from GM were $343.1 million at year-end 2014 and $278.5 million at year-end
2013. Sales to FCA US LLC, formerly known as Chrysler Group LLC, (Chrysler) were approximately 18% of our
consolidated net sales in 2014, 12% in 2013 and 10% in 2012. Accounts receivable due from Chrysler were $99.3
million at year-end 2014 and $85.9 million at year-end 2013. No other single customer accounted for more than
10% of our consolidated net sales in any year presented.
In addition, our total GM postretirement cost sharing asset was $287.8 million as of December 31, 2014 and
$255.9 million as of December 31, 2013. See Note 5 - Employee Benefit Plans for more detail on this cost sharing
asset.
We diversify the concentration of invested cash and cash equivalents among different financial institutions and
we monitor the selection of counterparties to other financial instruments to avoid unnecessary concentrations of
credit risk.
50
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
4. FAIR VALUE
The fair value accounting guidance defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The
definition is based on an exit price rather than an entry price, regardless of whether the entity plans to hold or sell
the asset. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy to prioritize inputs used in measuring fair value as
follows:
•
•
•
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or
indirectly; and
Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting
entity to develop its own assumptions.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The estimated fair values of our financial assets and liabilities that are recognized
at fair value on a recurring basis, using available market information and other observable data are as follows:
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Input
(in millions)
(in millions)
Balance Sheet Classification
Cash equivalents ........................................ $
Prepaid expenses and other
Currency forward contracts.....................
Other accrued expenses
Currency forward contracts ....................
Other long-term liabilities
Currency forward contracts ....................
35.3 $
35.3 $
6.1 $
6.1
Level 1
—
8.3
0.1
—
8.3
0.1
0.7
0.4
—
0.7
Level 2
0.4
Level 2
—
Level 2
The carrying values of our cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate
their fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying values of our borrowings under
the foreign credit facilities approximate their fair values due to the frequent resetting of the interest rates. We
estimated the fair value of our outstanding debt using available market information and other observable data to be
as follows:
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Input
(in millions)
(in millions)
Revolving Credit Facility ............................. $
Term Facility ...............................................
7.75% Notes ...............................................
6.625% Notes .............................................
6.25% Notes ...............................................
5.125% Notes .............................................
— $
— $
— $
142.5
200.0
550.0
400.0
200.0
141.1
224.0
583.0
419.0
202.6
150.0
200.0
550.0
400.0
200.0
—
147.8
227.5
578.9
423.0
206.0
Level 2
Level 2
Level 2
Level 2
Level 2
Level 2
Investments in our defined benefit pension plans are stated at fair value. See Note 5 - Employee Benefit Plans
for additional fair value disclosures of our pension plan assets.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS In 2012 as part of our impairment analysis, we were required to measure the fair value
of certain long-lived assets. We considered the expected future use of certain long-lived assets remaining at our
Detroit Manufacturing Complex (DMC). Assets that were not to be redeployed to other AAM facilities were
determined to be fully impaired.
51
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes impairments of long-lived assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis subsequent to initial recognition:
Balance Sheet Classification
Fair Value
Measurements using
Level 3 Inputs
Asset Impairment
Recorded in Twelve
Months ended
December 31, 2012
Property, plant and equipment, net ....................................... $
— $
5.8
In 2012, we reassessed the expected future use of certain assets remaining at DMC that were previously
leased assets that had been purchased in 2011 for $18.6 million. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of
$5.8 million related to the assets that we no longer intended to redeploy and use at another AAM facility.
5. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS We sponsor various qualified and
non-qualified defined benefit pension plans for our eligible associates. We also maintain hourly and salaried benefit
plans that provide postretirement medical, dental, vision and life insurance benefits (OPEB) to our eligible retirees
and their dependents in the U.S.
AAM and GM share proportionally in the cost of OPEB for eligible retirees based on the length of service an
employee had with AAM and GM. We have included in our OPEB obligation the amounts expected to be received
pursuant to this agreement of $287.8 million and $255.9 million at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013,
respectively. We have also recorded a corresponding asset for these amounts on our Consolidated Balance Sheet,
$13.3 million that is classified as a current asset and $274.5 million that is classified as a noncurrent asset as of
December 31, 2014.
Actuarial valuations of our benefit plans were made as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. The principal
weighted-average assumptions used in the year-end valuation of our U.S. and U.K. plans appear in the following
table. The U.S. discount rates are based on an actuarial review of a hypothetical portfolio of long-term, high quality
corporate bonds matched against the expected payment stream for each of our plans. The U.K. discount rate is
based on a review of long-term bonds, in consideration of the average duration of plan liabilities. The assumptions
for expected return on plan assets are based on future capital market expectations for the asset classes
represented within our portfolios and a review of long-term historical returns. The rates of increase in compensation
and health care costs are based on current market conditions, inflationary expectations and historical information.
Pension Benefits
OPEB
2014
2013
2012
2014
2013
2012
U.S.
U.K
U.S.
U.K
U.S.
U.K.
Discount rate ..............
4.10%
3.70% 5.00%
4.50% 4.10%
4.30% 4.15% 4.95% 4.05%
Expected return on
plan assets .................
Rate of compensation
increase .....................
7.50%
5.00% 7.50%
5.15% 7.50%
4.35%
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.00%
3.30% 4.00%
3.60% 4.00%
3.15% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%
52
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $723.9 million and $744.5 million
at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the accumulated benefit
obligation for our underfunded defined benefit pension plans was $586.5 million, the projected benefit obligation
was $598.3 million and the fair value of assets for these plans was $496.3 million. The following table summarizes
the changes in projected benefit obligations and plan assets and reconciles the funded status of the benefit plans,
which is the net benefit plan liability:
Pension Benefits
December 31,
OPEB
December 31,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in millions)
(in millions)
842.8 $
3.4
577.9 $
0.3
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year .................... $
Service cost ............................................................
Interest cost ............................................................
Plan amendments ...................................................
Actuarial loss (gain) ................................................
Change in GM portion of OPEB obligation ..............
Participant contributions ..........................................
Settlements .............................................................
Benefit payments ....................................................
Currency fluctuations ..............................................
Net change ..............................................................
Benefit obligation at end of year .............................. $
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year......... $
Actual return on plan assets....................................
Employer contributions ............................................
Participant contributions ..........................................
Benefit payments ....................................................
Settlements .............................................................
Currency fluctuations ..............................................
Net change ..............................................................
Fair value of plan assets at end of year .................. $
755.4 $
3.5
36.1
—
119.3
—
0.4
(131.1)
(36.5)
(8.3)
(16.6)
738.8 $
33.8
—
(92.6)
—
0.4
—
(35.3)
2.9
(87.4)
755.4 $
713.4 $
695.4 $
77.2
1.9
0.4
(36.5)
(104.2)
(8.5)
(69.7)
643.7 $
49.2
0.8
0.4
(35.3)
—
2.9
18.0
713.4 $
601.3
0.4
13.2
(8.1)
(0.7)
(17.0)
—
—
(11.2)
—
(23.4)
577.9
—
—
11.2
—
(11.2)
—
—
—
—
15.3
—
41.2
31.8
—
—
(11.8)
—
76.8
654.7 $
— $
—
11.8
—
(11.8)
—
—
—
— $
During 2014, the society of actuaries issued updated mortality tables for our U.S. benefit plans. These new
mortality tables increased our projected benefit obligations for our U.S. pension and OPEB plans by $25.2 million
and $19.0 million, respectively.
53
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Amounts recognized in our balance sheets are as follows:
Pension Benefits
December 31,
OPEB
December 31,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in millions)
(in millions)
Noncurrent assets ...................................................... $
6.9 $
9.3 $
— $
Current liabilities .........................................................
Noncurrent liabilities ...................................................
(3.0)
(99.0)
(2.3)
(49.0)
(29.6)
(625.1)
Net liability .................................................................. $
(95.1) $
(42.0) $
(654.7) $
—
(30.8)
(547.1)
(577.9)
Pre-tax amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI), not yet recognized in net
periodic benefit cost as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, consists of:
Net actuarial gain (loss) .............................................. $
Net prior service credit ...............................................
Total amounts recorded.............................................. $
Pension Benefits
December 31,
OPEB
December 31,
2014
2013
2014
2013
(in millions)
(215.3) $
0.7
(214.6) $
(194.3) $
0.8
(193.5) $
(in millions)
(35.7) $
15.4
(20.3) $
4.9
18.1
23.0
The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
Pension Benefits
2014
2013
2012
2014
(in millions)
OPEB
2013
(in millions)
2012
Service cost .................................... $
Interest cost ....................................
Expected asset return ....................
Amortized actuarial loss .................
Amortized prior service cost
(credit) ............................................
Special and contractual
termination benefits ...................
Curtailment gain .............................
Settlement charge (gain) ................
Net periodic benefit cost ................. $
3.5 $
3.4 $
3.1 $
0.3 $
0.4 $
36.1
(48.4)
5.4
(0.1)
—
—
35.5
32.0 $
33.8
(45.8)
8.9
5.4
—
—
—
5.7 $
35.1
(34.7)
7.8
0.5
15.3
—
0.5
13.2
—
0.9
0.4
15.1
—
0.6
(2.7)
(1.8)
(2.0)
12.8
—
—
24.6 $
—
—
—
13.4 $
—
—
—
12.7 $
16.2
(21.8)
(5.2)
3.3
Our postretirement cost sharing asset from GM is measured on the same basis as the portion of the obligation
to which it relates. The actuarial gains and losses related to the GM portion of the OPEB obligation are recognized
immediately in the Consolidated Statement of Income as an offset against the gains and losses related to the
change in the corresponding GM postretirement cost sharing asset. These items are presented net in the change
in benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost components disclosed above. Remaining actuarial gains and
losses are deferred and amortized over the expected future service periods of the active participants.
54
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service credit for the defined benefit pension plans that is expected to
be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost in 2015 are $6.9 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The
estimated net actuarial loss and prior service credit for the other defined benefit postretirement plans that is
expected to be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost in 2015 are $0.7 million and $2.7 million,
respectively.
For measurement purposes, a weighted average annual increase in the per-capita cost of covered health care
benefits of 7.0% was assumed for 2015. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% by 2023 and to
remain at that level thereafter. Health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the
health care plans. A 1.0% increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have increased total service
and interest cost in 2014 and the postretirement obligation, net of GM cost sharing, at December 31, 2014 by $1.6
million and $41.3 million, respectively. A 1.0% decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have
decreased total service and interest cost in 2014 and the postretirement obligation, net of GM cost sharing, at
December 31, 2014 by $1.3 million and $34.1 million, respectively.
The expected future pension and other postretirement benefits to be paid, net of GM cost sharing, for each of
the next five years and in the aggregate for the succeeding five years thereafter are as follows: $55.3 million in
2015; $55.4 million in 2016; $56.4 million in 2017; $56.6 million in 2018; $56.9 million in 2019 and $293.6 million for
2020 through 2024. These amounts were estimated using the same assumptions that were used to measure our
2014 year-end pension and OPEB obligations and include an estimate of future employee service.
Contributions In 2012, AAM and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation entered into an agreement
regarding any liability that may have arisen under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 in
connection with the closures of DMC and CKMF. As part of this agreement, in 2012, we contributed $114.7 million
in excess of our statutory minimum to our U.S. hourly pension plan.
Due to our significant pension contributions made in 2012, we do not expect to make any cash payments in
2015 to satisfy our regulatory funding requirements. We expect our cash outlay, net of GM cost sharing, for OPEB
to be approximately $16 million in 2015.
Labor relations In 2012, we recorded a gain of $21.8 million in cost of goods sold for the curtailment of certain
OPEB. This resulted primarily from the reduction in expected future OPEB related to the DMC and CKMF hourly
associates who have terminated employment from AAM as a result of our plant closures. These curtailment gains
resulted in an increase in our accumulated other comprehensive loss of $21.8 million pre-tax.
Also in 2012, we notified hourly associates of the termination of a benefit plan, which provided legal services to
certain eligible hourly associates represented by the International UAW. As a result of terminating this plan, we
recorded a settlement gain of $5.2 million in cost of goods sold in 2012. Recognition of this settlement gain
reduced postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities by $4.7 million and also reduced our accumulated
other comprehensive loss by $0.5 million pre-tax.
Terminated vested lump sum payout offer On September 22, 2014, we announced a plan to offer a
voluntary one-time lump sum payment option to certain eligible terminated vested participants in our U.S. pension
plans that, if accepted, would settle our pension obligations to them (“AAM Pension Payout Offer”). The lump sum
settlements, which were paid from plan assets, reduced our liabilities and administrative costs going forward.
The AAM Pension Payout Offer was open from October 2, 2014 through November 12, 2014 to approximately
6,000 of our 14,000 total U.S. pension plan participants. In addition to the lump sum payment option, the AAM
Pension Payout Offer allowed participants to commence payment of their monthly benefits early.
In total, 3,335 participants accepted the offer and we made a one-time lump sum payment from our pension
trust of $104.2 million on December 19, 2014. As a result of this settlement, we remeasured the assets and
liabilities of our U.S. pension plans, which reduced our projected benefit obligation by $131.1 million and resulted in
a non-cash charge of $35.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 related to the accelerated recognition of certain
deferred losses.
55
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Amendments to pension and OPEB plans and contractual termination benefits In the third quarter of
2013, we remeasured the AAM Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) due to the passing of our Co-
Founder and former Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. As a result of this remeasurement, we recorded
$4.7 million in selling, general and administrative expense related to the acceleration of prior service cost.
As a result of our election to apply the provisions of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act
(MAP-21), in addition to certain actions we took in 2012, we agreed to provide pension and postretirement benefits
to certain eligible UAW associates whose employment had been terminated in connection with the DMC and CKMF
plant closures. In 2012, we recorded $28.7 million in cost of goods sold, for these pension and postretirement
benefits. These incremental pension and postretirement benefits were also agreed to in connection with the lawsuit
filed by the International UAW against AAM. See Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies for more detail on this
lawsuit.
Pension plan assets The weighted-average asset allocations of our pension plan assets at December 31,
2014 and 2013 appear in the following table. The asset allocation for our plans is developed in consideration of the
demographics of the plan participants and expected payment stream of the benefit obligation.
U.S.
Target
U.K.
Target
2014
2013
Allocation
2014
2013
Allocation
Equity securities ..................
33.1%
42.5%
30% - 65%
28.7%
30.7%
25% - 35%
Fixed income securities .......
Hedge funds ........................
Cash ....................................
47.3
18.3
1.3
48.5
8.8
0.2
35% - 55%
0% - 20%
0% - 5%
61.1
10.1
0.1
59.0
10.2
0.1
55% - 65%
5% - 15%
0% - 5%
Total.....................................
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
The primary objective of our pension plan assets is to provide a source of retirement income for participants
and beneficiaries. Our primary financial objectives for the pension plan assets have been established in
conjunction with a comprehensive review of our current and projected financial requirements. These objectives
include having the ability to pay all future benefits and expenses when due, maintaining flexibility and minimizing
volatility. These objectives are based on a long-term investment horizon.
56
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets Investments in our defined benefit plans are stated at fair value. Level 1
assets are valued using quoted market prices that represent the asset value of the shares held by the trusts. The
level 2 assets are investments in pooled funds, which are valued using a model to reflect the valuation of their
underlying assets that are publicly traded with observable values. The fair value of our level 3 postretirement
benefit plan assets are measured by compiling the portfolio holdings and independently valuing the securities in
those portfolios. The fair values of our pension plan assets are as follows:
December 31, 2014
Asset Categories
Cash & Cash Equivalents ............................ $
Equity
U.S. Large Cap ...........................................
U.S. Small/Mid Cap ....................................
World Equity ...............................................
Fixed Income Securities
Government & Agencies.............................
Corporate Bonds - Investment Grade.........
Corporate Bonds - Non-investment Grade
Emerging Market Debt................................
Other ..........................................................
Hedge Funds
Property Funds ...........................................
Multi Strategy Hedge Fund .........................
Total Plan Assets.......................................... $
December 31, 2013
Asset Categories
Cash & Cash Equivalents ............................ $
Equity
U.S. Large Cap ...........................................
U.S. Small/Mid Cap ....................................
World Equity ...............................................
Fixed Income Securities
Government & Agencies.............................
Corporate Bonds - Investment Grade.........
Corporate Bonds - Non-investment Grade
Emerging Market Debt................................
Other ..........................................................
Hedge Funds
Property Funds ...........................................
Multi Strategy Hedge Fund .........................
Total Plan Assets.......................................... $
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
(in millions)
6.7 $
— $
— $
6.7
87.3
25.2
94.2
67.9
139.9
31.9
19.0
7.2
—
—
—
—
—
58.8
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
48.3
57.3
479.3 $
58.8 $
105.6 $
87.3
25.2
94.2
126.7
139.9
31.9
19.0
7.2
48.3
57.3
643.7
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
1.5 $
(in millions)
— $
— $
1.5
128.0
49.4
109.3
70.5
167.1
25.8
17.4
16.9
—
—
—
—
—
63.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7.1
57.4
585.9 $
63.0 $
64.5 $
128.0
49.4
109.3
133.5
167.1
25.8
17.4
16.9
7.1
57.4
713.4
57
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The changes in the fair value of our level 3 assets in the Property Funds and Multi Strategy Hedge Fund are as
follows:
Beginning balance .......................................................................................... $
Actual return on plan assets:
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date ..........................................
Purchases, sales and settlements, net .........................................................
Ending balance ............................................................................................... $
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
64.5 $
3.3
37.8
105.6 $
47.6
3.5
13.4
64.5
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS Most of our salaried U.S. associates are eligible to participate in voluntary
savings plans. Our maximum match is 50% of eligible salaried associates' contribution up to 10% of their eligible
salary. Matching contributions amounted to $3.9 million in 2014, $3.9 million in 2013 and $3.3 million in 2012. U.S.
salaried associates are eligible to receive an additional annual retirement contribution (ARC) benefit between 3% to
5% of eligible salary, depending on years of service. We made ARC contributions of $4.9 million, $4.6 million and
$4.4 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Certain UAW represented associates at our original U.S. locations are eligible for a Company match on
associate contributions made to the voluntary savings plans. Our maximum match is 25% of hourly associates'
contribution up to the first 6% of their contributions. Matching contributions amounted to $0.1 million in 2014, 2013
and 2012. Certain UAW represented associates are also eligible to receive an ARC benefit of 5% of eligible wages,
which also began in 2009. We made ARC contributions of $2.6 million in 2014, $1.9 million in 2013 and $1.6 million
in 2012 related to these associates.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN Certain U.S. associates are eligible to participate in a non-qualified
deferred compensation plan. Payments of $1.2 million, $6.1 million and $0.8 million have been made in 2014, 2013
and 2012, respectively, to eligible associates that have elected distributions. Included in these payments, in 2013,
was a distribution of $5.6 million to the beneficiary of the plan upon the passing of our Co-Founder and former
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. This payment resulted in a $5.6 million reduction in postretirement
benefits and other long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and was partially offset by proceeds of
$5.0 million, which AAM received as the beneficiary of a key man life insurance policy in 2013.
At December 31, 2014 and 2013, our deferred compensation liability was $5.6 million and $6.2 million,
respectively. Due to the changes in the value of this deferred compensation plan we increased our liability by $0.3
million, $0.8 million and $1.3 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
58
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
At December 31, 2014, we had grants outstanding under stock incentive compensation plans approved by our
stockholders. Under these plans, a total of 18.5 million shares have been authorized for issuance to our directors,
officers and certain other associates in the form of options, unvested restricted stock or other awards that are based
on the value of our common stock. Shares available for future grants at December 31, 2014 were 2.2 million. The
current stock plan will expire in April 2022.
STOCK OPTIONS Under the terms of the plans, stock options are granted at the market price of the stock on
the grant date. The contractual term of outstanding stock options is 10 years. We issue new shares to satisfy
stock-based awards.
Stock option awards become exercisable in three approximately equal annual installments beginning one year
from the date of grant.
The following table summarizes activity relating to our stock options:
Weighted-
Number of
Average Exercise
Shares
Price Per Share
(in millions, except per share data)
Outstanding at January 1, 2012 .........................................................
Options granted ..................................................................................
Options exercised ...............................................................................
Options canceled ................................................................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 ....................................................
Options granted ..................................................................................
Options exercised ...............................................................................
Options canceled ................................................................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 ....................................................
Options granted ..................................................................................
Options exercised ...............................................................................
Options canceled ................................................................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 ....................................................
Exercisable at December 31, 2012 .....................................................
Exercisable at December 31, 2013 .....................................................
Exercisable at December 31, 2014 .....................................................
3.9 $
0.2
(0.1)
(1.0)
3.0 $
—
(0.1)
(0.9)
2.0 $
—
(0.1)
(1.0)
0.9 $
2.8 $
2.0 $
0.9 $
26.95
9.19
2.81
25.12
27.08
—
10.59
24.28
29.22
—
13.87
37.70
20.66
28.02
29.22
20.66
As of December 31, 2014, there were no unvested stock options. The total intrinsic value of options
outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2014 was $3.4 million. The total intrinsic value of stock options
exercised was $0.5 million in 2014, $0.8 million in 2013 and $0.5 million in 2012.
59
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The following is a summary of the range of exercise prices for stock options that are outstanding and
exercisable at December 31, 2014:
Range of
Exercise Prices
$9.19 - $15.58 .....
$19.54 - $26.65 ...
Weighted-
Average
Stock Options
Exercise
Price Per Share
Outstanding
(in millions, except per share data)
13.22
0.4 $
0.5
0.9 $
26.05
20.66
Weighted-
Average
Contractual Life
(in years)
3.2
1.2
2.0
Weighted-
Average
Stock Options
Exercise
Price Per Share
Exercisable
(in millions, except per share data)
13.22
0.4 $
0.5
0.9 $
26.05
20.66
OTHER STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION We awarded performance accelerated restricted stock, restricted
stock and restricted stock units (PARS, RS and RSUs, respectively). The total amount of compensation expense
associated with the RSUs settled in cash is recorded as an accrued liability when incurred while the total amount of
compensation expense associated with PARS, RS and RSUs settled in stock is recorded to paid-in-capital. The
PARS and RSUs vest over three years contingent upon the satisfaction of future financial performance targets
specified by the plan and the RS vests over three years. The unearned compensation is expensed over the
expected vesting period.
The following table summarizes activity relating to our PARS, RS and RSUs:
Weighted Average
Number of
Grant Date Fair
Shares/Units
Value per Share/Unit
(in millions, except per share data)
Outstanding at January 1, 2012 ....................................................
Granted ........................................................................................
Vested ..........................................................................................
Canceled ......................................................................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 ...............................................
Granted ........................................................................................
Vested ..........................................................................................
Canceled ......................................................................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 ...............................................
Granted ........................................................................................
Vested ..........................................................................................
Canceled ......................................................................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 ...............................................
1.6 $
1.0
(1.4)
(0.1)
1.1 $
0.9
(0.7)
—
1.3 $
0.5
(0.1)
(0.1)
1.6 $
10.74
10.31
10.19
26.02
11.08
12.79
11.06
—
12.24
19.58
13.95
12.76
14.54
As of December 31, 2014, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs totaled $10.4 million.
The weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is approximately one year. In 2014
and 2013, the total fair market value of RS and RSUs vested was $1.7 million and $13.8 million, respectively.
We made cash payments of $0.2 million related to vested RSUs in 2012.
60
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
PERFORMANCE SHARES As of December 31, 2014, we have performance shares (PS) outstanding under
our 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan. We granted performance shares payable in stock to officers which vest in full
over a three-year performance period. The payout of these stock-based awards is based equally on a total
shareholder return (TSR) measure and AAM's three-year earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and
amortization margin (EBITDA). The TSR metric compares our TSR over the three-year performance period relative
to the TSR of our pre-defined competitor peer group. Share price appreciation and dividends paid are measured
over the performance period to determine TSR. As these awards are settled in stock, the compensation expense
booked ratably over the vesting period is recorded to paid-in-capital.
The following table summarizes activity relating to our performance shares:
EBITDA
Outstanding at January 1, 2014 ....................................................
Granted ........................................................................................
Vested ..........................................................................................
Canceled ......................................................................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 ...............................................
TSR
Outstanding at January 1, 2014 ....................................................
Granted ........................................................................................
Vested ..........................................................................................
Canceled ......................................................................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 ...............................................
Number of
Shares
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value per Share
(in millions, except per share data)
— $
0.2
—
—
0.2 $
— $
0.2
—
—
0.2 $
—
27.66
—
—
27.66
—
21.11
—
—
21.11
We estimated the fair value of our performance shares related to EBITDA on the date of grant using our
estimated three-year EBITDA margin, based on AAM's budget and long-range plan assumptions at that time. We
estimated the fair value of our performance shares related to TSR on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo
simulation approach. The Monte Carlo simulation approach utilizes inputs on volatility assumptions, risk free rates,
the price of the Company’s and our competitor peer group's common stock and their correlation as of each
valuation date. Volatility assumptions are based on historical and implied volatility measurements.
Based on the current fair value, the estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested PS totaled
$5.3 million, as of December 31, 2014. The weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be
recognized is approximately two years.
PERFORMANCE AWARDS As of December 31, 2014, we have performance awards outstanding under our
2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which are fully vested. We granted performance awards payable in cash to our
officers and executives which vest in full over a three year performance period. The payout of these awards is
based on a TSR measure that compares our TSR over the three-year performance period relative to the TSR of our
pre-defined competitor peer group. Share price appreciation and dividends paid is measured over the performance
period to determine TSR.
According to the applicable accounting guidance, these awards are considered to be stock-based
compensation because the final payout amount is based “at least in part” on the price of our shares. However, as
these awards are settled in cash, they are determined to be liability awards and have been remeasured at the end
of each reporting period until settlement. The fair value of the performance awards was calculated on a quarterly
basis using the Monte Carlo simulation approach, described above, and the liability was adjusted accordingly based
on changes to the fair value and the percentage of time vested.
61
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
We recognized compensation expense associated with the performance awards of approximately $1.4 million in
2014, $7.9 million in 2013 and $3.0 million in 2012. We have a liability of $3.7 million recorded as of December 31,
2014, which will be paid out in the first quarter of 2015. As of December 31, 2014, there is no unrecognized
compensation cost related to the performance awards.
7.
INCOME TAXES
Income before income taxes for U.S. and non-U.S. operations was as follows:
2014
2013
(in millions)
2012
U.S. income (loss) .................................................................... $
Non - U.S. income ....................................................................
Total income before income taxes............................................ $
12.0 $
164.7
176.7 $
(23.8) $
110.1
86.3 $
(6.0)
37.5
31.5
The following is a summary of the components of our provisions for income taxes:
Current
Federal ..................................................................................... $
Other state and local ................................................................
Foreign .....................................................................................
Total current ............................................................................. $
Deferred
Federal ..................................................................................... $
Foreign .....................................................................................
Total deferred ...........................................................................
Total income tax expense (benefit)........................................... $
2014
2013
(in millions)
2012
0.6 $
0.1
44.2
44.9 $
(11.6) $
0.4
(11.2)
33.7 $
(1.3) $
0.1
12.1
10.9 $
(9.3) $
(9.8)
(19.1)
(8.2) $
(3.3)
1.1
10.2
8.0
(347.1)
3.9
(343.2)
(335.2)
The following is a reconciliation of our provision for income taxes to the expected amounts using statutory rates:
Federal statutory ......................................................................
Foreign income taxes ...............................................................
Change in enacted tax rate ......................................................
State and local .........................................................................
Tax Credits ...............................................................................
Valuation allowance .................................................................
U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings ...................................
Uncertain tax positions .............................................................
Other ........................................................................................
Effective income tax rate ..........................................................
2014
2013
2012
35.0%
(25.1)
—
0.1
(11.4)
4.5
1.9
13.0
1.1
35.0 %
(48.5)
(9.9)
0.2
—
12.4
(0.2)
(0.5)
2.0
35.0 %
(85.0)
—
3.5
—
(985.0)
(29.5)
(5.2)
2.0
19.1%
(9.5)%
(1,064.2)%
62
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Our income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2014 and 2013 primarily reflect favorable foreign tax rates,
along with our inability to realize a tax benefit for current foreign losses. In 2014, we recorded tax expense of $23.1
million for changes to prior year uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing and expense of $3.4 million for a
change in estimate for U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings. We also recorded a net tax benefit of $20.1 million
in 2014 related to our ability to utilize tax credits in future periods resulting in the recognition of a deferred tax asset.
In 2013, new Mexican tax reform was enacted that, among other things, increased the tax rate related to
Maquiladora Companies from 17.5% to 30%. We recorded a tax benefit of $8.5 million as a result of revaluing our
deferred tax assets at the newly enacted rate. In 2013, we recorded tax expense of $4.8 million relating to changes
in estimates in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. Our income tax benefit and effective tax rate for 2013 also
reflects the impact of recording a tax benefit of $1.5 million relating to the release of a prior year unrecognized tax
benefit due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations and a tax benefit of $3.3 million relating to an
election we made in 2013 regarding the treatment of foreign exchange gains and losses in a foreign jurisdiction.
During 2013, we also settled various income tax audits resulting in a reduction of our liability for unrecognized
income tax benefits of $8.4 million and a cash payment of $4.7 million.
In 2012, our business returned to a position of cumulative profitability on a pre-tax basis, considering our
operating results for the three years ended December 31, 2012. We concluded that this record of cumulative
profitability in recent years, in addition to the restructuring of our U.S. operations and our long range forecast
showing continued profitability, provided sufficient positive evidence that our net U.S. federal tax benefits more likely
than not would be realized. Accordingly, in 2012, we released the valuation allowance against our net federal
deferred assets for entities in the U.S., resulting in a $337.5 million benefit in our 2012 provision for income taxes.
Our income tax benefit and effective tax rate in 2012 reflect the impact of this valuation allowance reversal. Our
income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2012 also reflect a net tax expense of $1.3 million related to the
amendment of state income tax returns as a result of the settlement of federal income tax audits for the tax years
2004 through 2007.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we have refundable income taxes of $5.6 million and $4.9 million,
respectively, classified as prepaid expenses and other on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We also have income
taxes payable of $3.0 million and $2.6 million classified as other accrued expenses on our Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we have accrued
value added tax payable of $36.1 million and $38.3 million, respectively, classified as other accrued expenses on
our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The following is a summary of the significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities:
Current deferred tax assets
Employee benefits ................................................................................................ $
Inventory ...............................................................................................................
Prepaid taxes and other .......................................................................................
Valuation allowance ..............................................................................................
Total current deferred tax assets .......................................................................... $
Current deferred tax liabilities
Unrealized foreign exchange gain and other ........................................................
Current deferred tax asset, net ............................................................................. $
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
26.0 $
7.5
16.9
(10.2)
40.2 $
(0.1)
40.1 $
14.5
8.0
24.6
(10.7)
36.4
(0.1)
36.3
63
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Current deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
U.S. federal and state deferred tax asset, net ...................................................... $
Other foreign deferred tax asset, net ....................................................................
Current deferred tax asset, net ............................................................................. $
27.0 $
13.1
40.1 $
17.1
19.2
36.3
The following is a summary of the significant components of our noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities:
Noncurrent deferred tax assets
Employee benefits ................................................................................................ $
Net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards ...............................................................
Tax credit carryforwards .......................................................................................
Capital allowance carryforwards ...........................................................................
Fixed assets .........................................................................................................
Deferred revenue .................................................................................................
Capitalized expenditures ......................................................................................
Other ....................................................................................................................
Valuation allowances ............................................................................................
Noncurrent deferred tax assets ............................................................................
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
U.S. tax on unremitted foreign earnings ...............................................................
Fixed assets and other .........................................................................................
Noncurrent deferred tax asset, net ....................................................................... $
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
193.9 $
104.7
69.8
14.4
6.6
12.6
111.2
2.3
(146.7)
368.8
—
(9.1)
359.7 $
161.5
176.9
82.9
16.0
10.3
15.7
113.6
2.9
(153.0)
426.8
(85.0)
(9.8)
332.0
Noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:
U.S. federal and state deferred tax asset, net ...................................................... $
Other foreign deferred tax asset (liability), net ......................................................
Noncurrent deferred tax asset, net ....................................................................... $
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
362.2 $
(2.5)
359.7 $
337.2
(5.2)
332.0
64
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND VALUATION ALLOWANCES The deferred
income tax assets and liabilities previously summarized reflect the impact of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the basis of such assets and liabilities
as measured by tax laws. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had deferred tax assets from
domestic and foreign NOL and tax credit carryforwards of $188.9 million and $275.8 million, respectively.
Approximately $85.6 million of the deferred tax assets at December 31, 2014 relate to tax credits that can be
carried forward indefinitely with the remainder having carryover periods of 5 to 20 years. The deferred tax asset
relating to U.S. net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards as of December 31, 2014 is lower than the actual
amount reported and expected to be reported on our U.S. tax returns by $3.2 million. This difference is the result of
tax deductions in excess of financial statement amounts for stock based compensation. When this amount is
realized, we will record a credit to additional paid in capital and reduce our income taxes payable.
Accounting guidance for income taxes requires a deferred tax liability be established for the U.S. tax impact of
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless it can be shown that these earnings will be permanently
reinvested outside the U.S. Deferred income taxes have not been provided on $502.2 million of undistributed
earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries as such amounts are considered permanently reinvested. The remittance of
these undistributed earnings may subject us to U.S. income taxes and certain foreign withholding taxes at the time
of remittance, however, the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability relating to the
remittance of undistributed earnings is not practicable.
In accordance with the accounting guidance for income taxes, we estimate whether recoverability of our
deferred tax assets is “more likely than not,” based on forecasts of taxable income in the related tax jurisdictions. In
this estimate, we use historical results, projected future operating results based upon approved business plans,
eligible carry forward periods, tax planning opportunities and other relevant considerations.
As described above, in 2012, we released the valuation allowance against our net federal deferred tax assets
for entities in the United States, resulting in a $337.5 million benefit in our 2012 provision for income taxes. As of
December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we have a valuation allowance of $156.9 million and $163.7 million,
respectively, related to net deferred tax assets in several foreign jurisdictions and U.S. state and local jurisdictions.
UNRECOGNIZED INCOME TAX BENEFITS To the extent our uncertain tax positions do not meet the “more
likely than not” threshold, we have derecognized such positions. To the extent our uncertain tax positions meet the
“more likely than not” threshold, we have measured and recorded the highest probable benefit, and have
established appropriate reserves for benefits that exceed the amount likely to be sustained upon examination.
65
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized income tax benefits is as follows:
Balance at January 1, 2012 .................................................................. $
Increase in prior year tax positions .....................................................
Decrease in prior year tax positions ...................................................
Increase in current year tax positions .................................................
Settlement ..........................................................................................
Balance at December 31, 2012 ............................................................. $
Increase in prior year tax positions .....................................................
Decrease in prior year tax positions ...................................................
Increase in current year tax positions .................................................
Settlement ..........................................................................................
Balance at December 31, 2013 ............................................................. $
Increase in prior year tax positions .....................................................
Decrease in prior year tax positions ...................................................
Increase in current year tax positions .................................................
Balance at December 31, 2014 ............................................................. $
Unrecognized
Income Tax
Benefits
Interest and
Penalties
(in millions)
25.8 $
—
(1.1)
0.4
(4.4)
20.7 $
6.1
(4.4)
4.0
(4.7)
21.7 $
10.5
(0.5)
15.6
47.3 $
7.4
2.8
—
—
—
10.2
0.1
(6.2)
—
—
4.1
8.1
—
—
12.2
At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $47.3 million and $21.7 million of net unrecognized
income tax benefits, respectively. Changes to prior and current year tax positions for the year ended December 31,
2014 relate primarily to transfer pricing, income tax credits and the effect of changes in exchange rates.
In 2014, 2013, and 2012, we recognized expense of $8.1 million, benefit of $6.1 million and expense of $2.8
million, respectively, related to interest and penalties in income tax expense on our Consolidated Statement of
Income. We have a liability of $12.2 million and $4.1 million related to the estimated future payment of interest and
penalties at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well as various states and foreign jurisdictions. The
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commenced an examination of our U.S. income tax returns for 2010 and 2011 in
2013. The Mexican tax authorities commenced a transfer pricing examination of our income tax return for 2008 in
2013 and continue with its transfer pricing examination of our 2007 income tax return. In 2014, the India Tax
Authorities commenced a transfer pricing examination for the 2010/2011 tax year. We are no longer subject to U.S.
federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007. At this time,
we are not aware of any examinations underway in any other foreign jurisdictions.
The U.S. federal income tax examination for the years 2008 and 2009 and the Mexico transfer pricing
examination for the year 2006 were settled in 2013. These settlements resulted in a reduction of a portion of our
liability for unrecognized income tax benefits and a cash payment of $4.7 million in 2013.
Based on the status of the IRS audits and audits outside the U.S., and the protocol of finalizing audits by the
relevant tax authorities, it is not possible to estimate the impact of changes, if any, to previously recorded uncertain
tax positions. Although it is not possible to predict the timing of the conclusion of all ongoing audits with certainty,
we anticipate that the current U.S. IRS audit will be completed during 2015. It is also possible that the current 2007
and 2008 audits with the Mexican tax authorities will be completed before the end of 2016. Although it is difficult to
estimate with certainty the amount of an audit settlement for the years currently under audit, we do not expect any
settlements will be materially different from what we have recorded in unrecognized tax benefits. We will continue
to monitor the progress and conclusions of all ongoing audits and will adjust our estimated liability as necessary.
66
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
We present earnings per share (EPS) using the two-class method. This method allocates undistributed
earnings between common shares and non-vested share based payment awards that entitle the holder to
nonforfeitable dividend rights. Our participating securities include non-vested restricted stock units.
The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted EPS available to shareholders of
common stock (excluding participating securities):
2014
2013
2012
(in millions, except per share data)
Numerator
Net income attributable to AAM .......................................................... $
Less: Net income attributable to participating securities .................
Net income attributable to common shareholders - Basic ................... $
Undistributed earnings reallocated to common shareholders
under two step dilutive method .......................................................
Net income attributable to common shareholders - Dilutive ................ $
143.0 $
(2.9)
140.1 $
—
140.1 $
94.5 $
(1.9)
92.6 $
—
92.6 $
Denominators
Basic common shares outstanding -
Weighted-average shares outstanding ...........................................
Less: Participating securities ......................................................
Weighted-average common shares outstanding ............................
77.3
(1.6)
75.7
76.7
(1.5)
75.2
367.7
(2.6)
365.1
—
365.1
75.3
(0.5)
74.8
Effect of dilutive securities -
Dilutive stock-based compensation ................................................
0.2
0.1
0.1
Diluted shares outstanding -
Adjusted weighted-average shares after assumed conversions.....
75.9
75.3
74.9
Basic EPS ........................................................................................... $
1.85 $
1.23 $
4.88
Diluted EPS ........................................................................................ $
1.85 $
1.23 $
4.87
Certain exercisable stock options were excluded in the computations of diluted EPS because the exercise price
of these options was greater than the average annual market prices of our stock. The number of stock options
outstanding excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS was 0.5 million at year-end 2014, 2.0 million at year-end
2013 and 3.3 million at year-end 2012. The ranges of exercise prices related to these stock options were $19.54 -
$26.65 at year-end 2014, $19.54 - $40.83 at year-end 2013 and $15.58 - $40.83 at year-end 2012.
67
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
PURCHASE COMMITMENTS Obligated purchase commitments for capital expenditures and related project
expenses were approximately $109.8 million at December 31, 2014 and $161.4 million at December 31, 2013.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS We are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our business. Although the
outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that any of these matters,
individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental and occupational safety and health
laws, regulations and ordinances, including those regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management
and environmental cleanup. We will continue to closely monitor our environmental conditions to ensure that we are
in compliance with all laws, regulations and ordinances. We have made, and will continue to make, capital and
other expenditures to comply with environmental requirements, including recurring administrative costs. Such
expenditures were not significant during 2014, 2013 and 2012.
In 2012, the International UAW filed suit against AAM alleging that we violated certain provisions of the
collective bargaining agreement covering represented hourly associates at the DMC and CKMF related to pension
and postretirement benefits. In 2012, we recorded $28.7 million in cost of goods sold related to pension and
postretirement benefits to be provided to certain eligible UAW associates as a result of our election to apply
MAP-21 and the subsequent recertification of our U.S. hourly pension plan. This suit was settled in 2012.
ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS Due to the nature of our manufacturing operations, we have legal
obligations to perform asset retirement activities pursuant to federal, state, and local requirements. The process of
estimating environmental liabilities is complex. Significant uncertainty may exist related to the timing and method of
the settlement of these obligations. Therefore, these liabilities are not reasonably estimable until a triggering event
occurs that allows us to estimate a range and assess the probabilities of potential settlement dates and the potential
methods of settlement.
In the future, we will update our estimated costs and potential settlement dates and methods and their
associated probabilities based on available information. Any update may change our estimate and could result in a
material adjustment to this liability.
68
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
PRODUCT WARRANTIES We record a liability for estimated warranty obligations at the dates our products
are sold. These estimates are established using sales volumes and internal and external warranty data where
there is no payment history and historical information about the average cost of warranty claims for customers with
prior claims. We estimate our costs based on the contractual arrangements with our customers, existing customer
warranty terms and internal and external warranty data, which includes a determination of our warranty claims and
take actions to improve product quality and minimize warranty claims. We continuously evaluate these estimates
and our customers' administration of their warranty programs. We closely monitor actual warranty claim data and
adjust the liability, as necessary, on a quarterly basis.
We recorded $2.3 million and $9.9 million of expense in 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to a field action
with our largest customer. In 2013, we made warranty payments of $12.3 million, of which $11.3 million related to
this field action. During 2014 and 2013, we also made adjustments to our warranty accrual to reflect revised
estimates regarding our projected future warranty obligations.
The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in the product warranty liability:
Beginning balance ............................................................................................. $
Accruals .............................................................................................................
Settlements ........................................................................................................
Adjustments to prior period accruals ..................................................................
Foreign currency translation ...............................................................................
Ending balance ................................................................................................... $
December 31,
2014
2013
(in millions)
14.3 $
9.3
(2.2)
(8.7)
(0.3)
12.4 $
29.1
12.8
(12.3)
(15.0)
(0.3)
14.3
69
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. RECLASSIFICATIONS OUT OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Reclassification adjustments and other activity impacting accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(AOCI) during the year ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows (in millions):
Defined
Benefit Plans
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Unrecognized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Total
Balance at December 31, 2013 ..... $
(197.9)
$
(18.6) $
0.3
$
(216.2)
Other comprehensive loss before
reclassifications .............................
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) into net income........
Net current period other
comprehensive loss.......................
(68.1) (a)
(30.3)
(6.8)
(105.2)
25.4 (a)(b)(d)
—
(0.9) (c)
24.5
(42.7)
(30.3)
(7.7)
(80.7)
Balance at December 31, 2014 ..... $
(240.6)
Balance at December 31, 2012 ..... $
Defined
Benefit Plans
(274.5)
$
$
(48.9) $
(7.4)
$
(296.9)
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Unrecognized
Gain on
Derivatives
Total
7.6
$
2.3
$
(264.6)
Other comprehensive income
(loss) before reclassifications ........
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) into net income........
Net current period other
comprehensive income (loss)........
67.7 (a)
(26.2)
0.8
42.3
8.9 (a)(b)
—
(2.8) (c)
6.1
76.6
(26.2)
(2.0)
48.4
Balance at December 31, 2013 ..... $
(197.9)
$
(18.6) $
0.3
$
(216.2)
(a) These amounts are net of tax of $36.6 million and $(13.4) million for the other comprehensive loss before
reclassifications and the amounts reclassified from AOCI, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014,
and $(36.7) million and $(4.6) million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013.
(b) The net amount reclassified from AOCI included $23.6 million in cost of goods sold (COGS) and $1.8 million
in selling, general & administrative expenses (SG&A) for the year ended December 31, 2014 and $4.7 million in
COGS and $4.2 million in SG&A for the year ended December 31, 2013.
(c) The amounts reclassified from AOCI are included in COGS.
(d) Includes a reclassification of $23.1 million, net of tax, in the fourth quarter of 2014, related to our terminated
vested lump-sum pension payout in the U.S.
70
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
We operate in one reportable segment: the manufacture, engineer, design and validation of driveline systems
and related components and chassis modules for light trucks, SUVs, passenger cars, crossover vehicles and
commercial vehicles. Financial information relating to our operations by geographic area is presented in the
following table. Net sales are attributed to countries based upon location of customer. Long-lived assets exclude
deferred income taxes.
Net sales
United States ...................................................................................... $
Canada ...............................................................................................
Mexico ................................................................................................
South America ....................................................................................
Asia .....................................................................................................
Europe and other ................................................................................
Total net sales ..................................................................................... $
Long-lived assets
United States ...................................................................................... $
Mexico ................................................................................................
South America ....................................................................................
Asia .....................................................................................................
Europe ................................................................................................
Total long-lived assets......................................................................... $
2014
December 31,
2013
(in millions)
2012
2,073.6 $
64.6
1,055.5
156.5
238.6
107.2
3,696.0 $
885.9 $
513.2
80.5
177.3
94.0
1,750.9 $
1,682.0 $
1,576.6
74.4
865.6
201.1
255.2
129.0
75.0
755.1
216.4
214.5
93.3
3,207.3 $
2,930.9
850.0 $
469.3
100.2
176.7
93.2
865.3
417.7
113.3
159.0
72.5
1,689.4 $
1,627.8
71
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
12. UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
2014
Net sales ......................................................... $
Gross profit ......................................................
Net income ......................................................
Net income attributable to AAM .......................
Basic EPS (1) .................................................... $
Diluted EPS (1) ................................................. $
2013
Net sales ......................................................... $
Gross profit ......................................................
Net income ......................................................
Net income attributable to AAM .......................
Basic EPS (1) .................................................... $
Diluted EPS (1) ................................................. $
Three Months Ended,
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
(in millions, except per share data)
858.8 $
946.9 $
950.8 $
121.9
33.6
33.6
149.0
52.2
52.2
0.44 $
0.44 $
0.67 $
0.67 $
755.6 $
104.3
7.3
7.3
0.10 $
0.10 $
799.6 $
122.2
25.8
25.8
0.34 $
0.34 $
140.7
44.0
44.0
0.57 $
0.57 $
820.8 $
125.3
31.6
31.6
0.41 $
0.41 $
939.5
111.2
13.2
13.2
0.17
0.17
831.3
126.9
29.8
29.8
0.39
0.39
(1) Full year basic and diluted EPS will not necessarily agree to the sum of the four quarters because each
quarter is a separate calculation.
72
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
13. SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Amounts have been revised for the effects of the error as discussed in Note 1 - Organization and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies.
Holdings has no significant assets other than its 100% ownership in AAM, Inc. and no direct subsidiaries other than
AAM, Inc. The 7.75% Notes, 6.625% Notes, 6.25% Notes and 5.125% Notes are senior unsecured obligations of AAM
Inc.; all of which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Holdings and substantially all domestic subsidiaries of AAM,
Inc., which are 100% indirectly owned by Holdings.
These Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements are prepared under the equity method of accounting whereby
the investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for the parent's share of the subsidiaries' cumulative
results of operations, capital contributions and distributions, and other equity changes.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
2014
Net sales
Holdings
AAM Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
(in millions)
Elims
Consolidated
External .............................................................. $
— $
1,099.5
$
225.1
$
2,371.4
$
— $
3,696.0
(281.6)
(281.6)
(281.6)
—
3,696.0
3,173.2
522.8
255.2
267.6
(90.9)
176.7
33.7
—
143.0
—
143.0
(80.7)
62.3
Intercompany ......................................................
Total net sales ........................................................
Cost of goods sold ..................................................
Gross profit .............................................................
Selling, general and administrative expenses ........
Operating income (loss) .........................................
Non-operating income (expense), net ....................
Income (loss) before income taxes .........................
Income tax expense (benefit) .................................
Earnings (loss) from equity in subsidiaries .............
Net income (loss) before royalties and dividends ...
Royalties and dividends ..........................................
Net income after royalties and dividends ................
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax .....................
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
143.0
143.0
—
143.0
(80.7)
13.1
1,112.6
1,112.4
0.2
194.0
(193.8)
(103.0)
(296.8)
(11.8)
204.0
(81.0)
224.0
143.0
(80.7)
246.9
472.0
396.1
75.9
0.2
75.7
9.0
84.7
0.9
(23.3)
60.5
—
60.5
(23.5)
21.6
2,393.0
1,946.3
446.7
61.0
385.7
3.1
388.8
44.6
—
344.2
(224.0)
120.2
(34.8)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(323.7)
(323.7)
—
(323.7)
139.0
Comprehensive income .......................................... $
62.3
$
62.3
$
37.0
$
85.4
$
(184.7) $
73
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Holdings
AAM Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Elims
Consolidated
2013
Net sales
External .............................................................. $
— $
773.6
$
226.0
$
2,207.7
$
— $
3,207.3
Intercompany ......................................................
Total net sales ........................................................
Cost of goods sold ..................................................
Gross profit .............................................................
Selling, general and administrative expenses ........
Operating income (loss) .........................................
Non-operating income (expense), net ....................
Income (loss) before income taxes .........................
Income tax expense (benefit) .................................
Earnings (loss) from equity in subsidiaries .............
Net income (loss) before royalties and dividends ...
Royalties and dividends ..........................................
Net income after royalties and dividends ................
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax ......
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
94.5
94.5
—
94.5
48.4
15.3
788.9
769.4
19.5
182.4
(162.9)
(155.1)
(318.0)
(24.9)
167.0
(126.1)
220.6
94.5
48.4
226.1
452.1
389.0
63.1
0.1
63.0
10.7
73.7
0.9
(21.7)
51.1
—
51.1
(7.2)
14.0
2,221.7
1,825.6
396.1
55.9
340.2
(9.6)
330.6
15.8
—
314.8
(220.6)
94.2
(10.8)
(255.4)
(255.4)
(255.4)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(239.8)
(239.8)
—
(239.8)
(30.4)
—
3,207.3
2,728.6
478.7
238.4
240.3
(154.0)
86.3
(8.2)
—
94.5
—
94.5
48.4
Comprehensive income .......................................... $
142.9
$
142.9
$
43.9
$
83.4
$
(270.2) $
142.9
2012
Net sales
Holdings
AAM Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Elims
Consolidated
External ............................................................... $
— $
704.8
$
214.4
$
2,011.7
$
— $
2,930.9
Intercompany .......................................................
Total net sales ........................................................
Cost of goods sold ..................................................
Gross profit .............................................................
Selling, general and administrative expenses ........
Operating income (loss) .........................................
Non-operating income (expense), net ....................
Income (loss) before income taxes .........................
Income tax expense (benefit) .................................
Earnings (loss) from equity in subsidiaries .............
Net income before royalties and dividends .............
Royalties and dividends ..........................................
Net income after royalties and dividends ................
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests ......
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
367.7
367.7
—
367.7
—
18.6
723.4
709.8
13.6
186.5
(172.9)
(135.2)
(308.1)
(343.9)
79.0
114.8
252.9
367.7
—
226.8
441.2
389.8
51.4
—
51.4
(2.2)
49.2
(5.5)
(49.2)
5.5
—
5.5
—
25.2
2,036.9
1,702.2
334.7
56.8
277.9
12.5
290.4
14.2
—
276.2
(252.9)
23.3
1.0
(270.6)
(270.6)
(270.6)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(397.5)
(397.5)
—
(397.5)
—
Net income attributable to AAM .............................. $
367.7
$
367.7
$
5.5
$
24.3
$
(397.5) $
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax .....................
(60.5)
(60.5)
(10.1)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
attributable to noncontrolling interests .................
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AAM. $
(3.6)
0.3
74.2
(0.6)
0.3
0.3
—
306.9
$
306.9
$
(4.6) $
20.4
$
(322.7) $
74
—
2,930.9
2,531.2
399.7
243.3
156.4
(124.9)
31.5
(335.2)
—
366.7
—
366.7
1.0
367.7
(60.5)
0.3
306.9
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
2014
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents ............................ $
Accounts receivable, net ................................
Intercompany receivables ..............................
Inventories, net ..............................................
Other current assets ......................................
Total current assets ............................................
Property, plant and equipment, net ....................
Goodwill .............................................................
Intercompany notes and accounts receivable ....
Other assets and deferred charges ....................
Investment in subsidiaries ..................................
Total assets ........................................................ $
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt ................... $
Accounts payable ...........................................
Intercompany payables ..................................
Other current liabilities ...................................
Total current liabilities.........................................
Intercompany notes and accounts payable ........
Long-term debt ..................................................
Investment in subsidiaries obligation .................
Other long-term liabilities ...................................
Total liabilities .....................................................
Total stockholders' equity ...................................
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.............. $
2013
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents ............................ $
Accounts receivable, net ................................
Intercompany receivables ..............................
Inventories, net ..............................................
Other current assets ......................................
Total current assets ............................................
Property, plant and equipment, net ....................
Goodwill .............................................................
Intercompany notes and accounts receivable ....
Other assets and deferred charges ....................
Investment in subsidiaries ..................................
Total assets ........................................................ $
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable ........................................... $
Intercompany payables ..................................
Other current liabilities ...................................
Total current liabilities.........................................
Intercompany notes and accounts payable ........
Long-term debt ..................................................
Investment in subsidiaries obligation .................
Other long-term liabilities ...................................
Total liabilities .....................................................
Total stockholders' equity ...................................
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.............. $
Holdings
AAM Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Elims
Consolidated
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
433.8
433.8
$
— $
—
—
—
—
320.4
—
—
—
320.4
113.4
433.8
$
69.7
137.5
231.0
64.9
53.6
556.7
230.0
—
509.4
736.6
1,134.6
3,167.3
9.4
127.3
177.0
121.0
434.7
6.9
1,483.1
—
808.8
2,733.5
433.8
3,167.3
(in millions)
$
— $
23.9
174.1
32.3
2.6
232.9
87.9
147.9
219.1
45.7
—
733.5
$
— $
38.9
105.3
4.4
148.6
—
4.9
53.8
0.6
207.9
525.6
733.5
$
$
$
$
179.5
371.3
10.0
151.6
52.6
765.0
743.2
7.1
—
121.3
—
1,636.6
3.6
278.1
132.8
104.5
519.0
401.2
35.4
—
125.8
1,081.4
555.2
1,636.6
Holdings
AAM Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
363.7
363.7
$
— $
—
—
323.2
—
—
—
323.2
40.5
363.7
$
36.9
102.7
180.5
62.4
43.8
426.3
239.8
—
327.0
671.7
1,240.1
2,904.9
106.2
117.4
120.4
344.0
3.7
1,500.0
—
693.5
2,541.2
363.7
2,904.9
75
$
— $
25.6
116.6
34.2
3.2
179.6
83.0
147.8
201.5
44.8
—
656.7
44.5
98.6
4.1
147.2
—
5.3
15.2
0.5
168.2
488.5
656.7
$
$
$
$
$
$
117.1
330.2
9.2
165.2
75.0
696.7
735.7
8.6
—
99.8
—
1,540.8
286.7
90.3
96.8
473.8
201.6
53.8
—
75.2
804.4
736.4
1,540.8
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
— $
—
(415.1)
—
—
(415.1)
—
—
(728.5)
—
(1,568.4)
(2,712.0) $
— $
—
(415.1)
—
(415.1)
(728.5)
—
(53.8)
—
(1,197.4)
(1,514.6)
(2,712.0) $
249.2
532.7
—
248.8
108.8
1,139.5
1,061.1
155.0
—
903.6
—
3,259.2
13.0
444.3
—
229.9
687.2
—
1,523.4
—
935.2
3,145.8
113.4
3,259.2
Elims
Consolidated
— $
—
(306.3)
—
—
(306.3)
—
—
(528.5)
—
(1,603.8)
(2,438.6) $
— $
(306.3)
—
(306.3)
(528.5)
—
(15.2)
—
(850.0)
(1,588.6)
(2,438.6) $
154.0
458.5
—
261.8
122.0
996.3
1,058.5
156.4
—
816.3
—
3,027.5
437.4
—
221.3
658.7
—
1,559.1
—
769.2
2,987.0
40.5
3,027.5
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
2014
Holdings
AAM Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
(in millions)
Elims
Consolidated
Net cash provided by operating activities.......... $
— $
83.4
$
41.9
$
193.1
$
— $
318.4
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment ..........
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and
equipment ..............................................................
Proceeds from government grants .........................
Intercompany activity ..............................................
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of equipment..........
Net cash used in investing activities .......................
Financing activities
Net debt activity ......................................................
Debt issuance costs ...............................................
Employee stock option exercises ...........................
Purchase of treasury stock .....................................
Intercompany activity ..............................................
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash...............
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents ............
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period .
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(0.3)
0.3
—
—
—
—
(51.3)
(18.6)
(136.6)
7.9
—
—
—
(43.4)
(7.8)
(0.3)
1.2
—
(0.3)
(7.2)
—
32.8
36.9
0.4
—
(23.3)
—
(41.5)
0.8
2.1
—
—
(133.7)
(0.4)
(13.8)
—
—
—
—
(0.4)
—
—
—
—
—
—
23.3
9.5
(6.5)
62.4
117.1
—
—
—
23.3
—
23.3
—
—
—
—
(23.3)
(23.3)
—
—
—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period........... $
— $
69.7
$
— $
179.5
$
— $
(206.5)
9.1
2.1
—
—
(195.3)
(22.0)
(0.3)
1.2
(0.3)
—
(21.4)
(6.5)
95.2
154.0
249.2
2013
Holdings
AAM Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Elims
Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities ................................................................ $
— $
(35.9) $
64.9
$
194.0
$
— $
223.0
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment ..........
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and
equipment ..............................................................
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of equipment..........
Intercompany activity ..............................................
Net cash used in investing activities .......................
Financing activities
Net debt activity ......................................................
Debt issuance costs ...............................................
Employee stock option exercises ...........................
Purchase of treasury stock .....................................
Intercompany activity ..............................................
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash...............
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents ............
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period .
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(0.4)
0.4
—
—
—
—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period........... $
— $
(61.2)
(12.5)
(178.2)
0.5
—
(52.6)
(64.6)
(0.3)
—
—
—
—
(0.3)
—
—
—
3.5
—
—
(174.7)
(5.0)
(0.1)
—
—
52.6
47.5
(1.5)
65.3
51.8
—
—
—
52.6
52.6
—
—
—
—
(52.6)
(52.6)
—
—
—
(251.9)
9.1
24.1
—
(218.7)
104.8
(16.7)
1.1
(0.4)
—
88.8
(1.5)
91.6
62.4
$
— $
117.1
$
— $
154.0
5.1
24.1
—
(32.0)
110.1
(16.6)
1.1
—
(0.4)
94.2
—
26.3
10.6
36.9
76
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2012
Holdings
AAM Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Elims
Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities ................................................................ $
— $
(274.3) $
46.6
$
52.2
$
— $
(175.5)
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment ..........
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and
equipment ..............................................................
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of equipment..........
Intercompany activity ..............................................
Net cash used in investing activities .......................
Financing activities
Net debt activity ......................................................
Debt issuance costs ...............................................
Employee stock option exercises, including tax
benefit ....................................................................
Purchase of treasury stock .....................................
Purchase of noncontrolling interest ........................
Intercompany activity ..............................................
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash...............
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents ...........
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period .
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(5.9)
—
5.9
—
—
—
—
(59.4)
(9.0)
(139.2)
7.0
12.1
(40.3)
257.9
(10.6)
0.1
—
—
(5.9)
241.5
—
(73.1)
83.7
—
—
(37.4)
(46.4)
3.1
—
(136.1)
(0.2)
16.2
—
—
—
—
—
(0.2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(4.0)
37.4
49.6
0.6
(33.7)
85.5
—
—
—
37.4
37.4
—
—
—
—
—
(37.4)
(37.4)
—
—
—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period........... $
— $
10.6
$
— $
51.8
$
— $
(207.6)
10.1
12.1
—
(185.4)
273.9
(10.6)
0.1
(5.9)
(4.0)
—
253.5
0.6
(106.8)
169.2
62.4
77
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
Detroit, Michigan
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2015 expressed an adverse opinion
on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 23, 2015
78
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
Detroit, Michigan
We have audited American Axle and Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company's") internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control —
Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for
its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on that risk, and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over
financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting,
such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified
and included in management's assessment: management has identified a material weakness in the operating
effectiveness of the Corporate Finance oversight of accounting for changes in certain accrued accounts payable
balances at a single location. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent
of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2014 of the Company and this report does not affect our report on such
financial statements and financial statement schedule.
79
In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness identified above on the achievement of the objectives
of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2014, of the Company and our report dated February 23, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 23, 2015
80
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. As discussed in our Form 10-Q/A for the
interim period ended September 30, 2014 and as discussed below, we identified a material weakness in our internal
control over financial reporting with respect to our accounting for changes in certain accrued accounts payable
balances at a single location. As a result, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a - 15(e) or 15d - 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) were not effective
as of December 31, 2014.
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our
internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors
regarding the preparation and fair presentation of our consolidated financial statements. Our management
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this
assessment, we used criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting,
such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
As of December 31, 2014, a material weakness in the operating effectiveness of the Corporate Finance
oversight of accounting for changes in certain accrued accounts payable balances at a single location existed.
Corporate Finance executives were not sufficiently involved in the review and analysis of the underlying support
for changes in the accrued accounts payable balances at the location. As a result, Corporate Finance lacked
sufficient information to properly assess the accounting for the correction of an overstatement of such accounts
under generally accepted accounting principles. The effect of this material weakness in internal control was a
misstatement of the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the third fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2014. This was corrected by restating the interim financial statements on Form 10-Q/
A.
Based on our assessment, and the identification of this material weakness, management concluded that, as of
December 31, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the criteria established
in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.
The attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting is included in Item 8 - ”Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
81
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2014, and in connection with the preparation of our consolidated annual
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 which occurred in the first fiscal quarter of 2015, we
have implemented new procedures, including enhanced documentation, analysis and review of changes in the
accrued accounts payable balances. We have retrained Finance executives at the location where the
overstatement of accrued accounts payable originated, as well as those working in Corporate Finance, as to the
importance of appropriate communication and review of non-routine changes in accruals so that any such changes
can be properly assessed under generally accepted accounting principles.
Except as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
As of February 23, 2015, management believes our remediation efforts have been effective with respect to our
internal control over financial reporting and that the previous material weakness in our internal control over financial
reporting has been remediated.
Item 9B. Other Information
None
82
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by Item 401(b), (d) (e) and (f) of Regulation S-K about our executive officers is
furnished in Part I of this Form 10-K, Annual Report under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant.” All
other information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement which we
expect to file on or about March 19, 2015.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and
the senior financial executives who report directly to our Chief Financial Officer. This code of ethics is available on
our website at www.aam.com. We will post on our website any amendment to or waiver from the provisions of the
code of ethics or our code of business conduct that applies to executive officers or directors of the Company.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by Item 13 under Items 404 and 407(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference
from our Proxy Statement.
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by Item 8(e) of Schedule 14A is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement.
83
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
1. All Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013
and 2012 is filed as part of this Form 10-K.
All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required.
3. Exhibits
The following exhibits were previously filed unless otherwise indicated:
Number
Description of Exhibit
3.01
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3.02
4.01
4.02
4.03
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-53491))
Amended and Restated Bylaws of American Axle & Manufacturing Inc.
Specimen Certificate for shares of the Company's Common Stock
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-53491))
Form of Indenture, among American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing
Holdings, Inc., as guarantor, certain subsidiary guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as
trustee
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated July 12,
2011.)
Indenture, dated as of November 3, 2011, among American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., the
Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee
(Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31,
2011.)
4.04
Form of 7.75% Senior Notes due 2019
(Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31,
2011.)
84
Number
Description of Exhibit
4.05
Form of 6.625% Notes due 2022
(Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 17,
2012.)
4.06
Form of 6.25% Notes due 2021
(Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 28,
2013.)
4.07
Form of 5.125% Notes due 2019
(Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 12,
2013.)
10.01
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 18, 1994, between AAM, Inc. and GM, and all
amendments thereto
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-53491))
10.02
Lifetime Program Contract for GMT-900 Products, between GM and AAM, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003.)
++10.03
Letter Agreement dated April 22, 2004 by and between DaimlerChrysler Corporation and AAM,
Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004.)
‡10.04
Forms of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Agreements under 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004.)
‡10.05
Form of 2004 Stock Option Agreement
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26,
2005.)
‡10.06
Form of 2005 Stock Option Agreement
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26,
2005.)
‡10.07
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26,
2005.)
‡10.08
Restated 1999 American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Compensation Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.)
85
Number
Description of Exhibit
++10.09
Letter Agreement between General Motors Corporation and American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.
dated June 29, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 29,
2007.)
‡10.10
Form of 2008 Stock Option Award Agreement for executive officers of American Axle &
Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.)
10.11
Agreement between General Motors Corporation and American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. dated
May 3, 2008, as amended May 16, 2008
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 23, 2008.)
‡10.12
Amended and Restated AAM 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 filed with American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.)
++10.13
Settlement and Commercial Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2009, among General Motors
Company, American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.62 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2009.)
10.14
First Lien Intercreditor Agreement dated as of December 18, 2009, among American Axle &
Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., certain domestic subsidiaries
of the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association and any additional
authorized representative from time to time party hereto
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21,
2009.)
‡10.15
Special Incentive Award Agreement dated March 15, 2010 between American Axle &
Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and David C. Dauch
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2010.)
‡10.16
Special Incentive Award Agreement dated March 15, 2010 between American Axle &
Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. and Michael K. Simonte
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2010.)
‡10.17
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.18
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.19
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-employee Directors under the 2012
Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
86
Number
Description of Exhibit
‡10.20
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Cliff Vesting) for Executive Officers under the
2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.21
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Installment Vesting) for Executive Officers under
the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.22
Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement for Executive Officers under the 2012 Omnibus
Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 1, 2012.)
‡10.23
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement
Program Document
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated July 27,
2012.)
10.24
10.25
10.26
10.27
10.28
Amendment and Restatement Agreement dated as of September 13, 2013, among American Axle
& Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and as
Collateral Agent, and each financial institution party thereto as a lender, including as Exhibit A
thereto, the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004 and amended
and restated as of September 13, 2013 among American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., American
Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
as Administrative Agent
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16,
2013.)
Guarantee Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004, as amended and restated as of September
13, 2013, among American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc., certain subsidiaries of American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. identified therein, and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent for the lenders referred to therein
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16,
2013.)
Collateral Agreement dated as of November 7, 2008, as amended and restated as of September
13, 2013, among American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., American Axle & Manufacturing,
Inc., certain subsidiaries of American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. identified therein and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Collateral Agent
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16,
2013.)
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated September 27, 2013 by and between the
Company and David C. Dauch
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 3,
2013.)
Amended and Restated American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan for
Executive Officers effective as of January 1, 2013
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated November
1, 2013.)
10.29
Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (Relative TSR) for Executive Officers under the
2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 07,
2014.)
87
Number
Description of Exhibit
10.30
Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (EBITDA) for Executive Officers under the 2012
Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 07,
2014.)
10.31
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Cliff Vesting) for Executive Officers under the
2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 07,
2014.)
10.32
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Board of Directors under the 2012 Omnibus
Incentive Plan
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated May 02,
2014.)
*12
*21
*23
*31.1
*31.2
*32
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
**101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
**101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
**101.PRE
XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
**101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
**101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
**101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
(All other exhibits are not applicable.)
++
‡
*
**
Confidential Treatment Request Granted by the SEC
Reflects Management or Compensatory Contract
Shown only in the original filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
Submitted electronically with the original filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
88
Schedule II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Balance at
Additions -
Charged to Deductions -
Beginning of Costs and
Expenses
Period
See Notes
Below
(in millions)
Balance
At End of
Period
Year Ended December 31, 2012:
Allowance for doubtful accounts ........................... $
5.5 $
2.0 $
1.0 (1) $
6.5
Allowance for deferred taxes ................................
Inventory valuation allowance ...............................
426.9
26.7
Year Ended December 31, 2013:
Allowance for doubtful accounts ...........................
6.5
Allowance for deferred taxes ................................
166.1
Inventory valuation allowance ...............................
21.0
Year Ended December 31, 2014:
Allowance for doubtful accounts ...........................
4.9
Allowance for deferred taxes ................................
163.7
Inventory valuation allowance ...............................
27.3
80.9
7.9
2.3
14.0
19.4
1.3
13.8
10.6
341.7 (3)
166.1
13.6 (2)
21.0
3.9 (1)
4.9
16.4
163.7
13.1 (2)
27.3
1.6 (1)
4.6
20.6 (4)
156.9
10.0 (2)
27.9
(1) Uncollectible accounts charged off net of recoveries.
(2) Primarily relates to inventory adjustments for physical quantity discrepancies and write-offs of excess and
obsolete inventories.
(3) Primarily relates to the reversal of the valuation allowance against our net U.S. federal deferred tax assets.
(4) Primarily relates to the reversal of a valuation allowance against an expiring net operating loss in China.
89
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Signatures
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING
HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
/s/ Michael K. Simonte
Michael K. Simonte
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(Chief Accounting Officer)
Date: February 23, 2015
90
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ David C. Dauch
David C. Dauch
/s/ Michael K. Simonte
Michael K. Simonte
/s/ Elizabeth A. Chappell
Elizabeth A. Chappell
/s/ Forest J. Farmer
Forest J. Farmer
/s/ Steven B. Hantler
Steven B. Hantler
/s/ Richard C. Lappin
Richard C. Lappin
/s/ James A. McCaslin
James A. McCaslin
/s/ William P. Miller II
William P. Miller II
/s/ John F. Smith
John F. Smith
/s/ Samuel Valenti III
Samuel Valenti III
/s/ Thomas K. Walker
Thomas K. Walker
Chairman of the Board, President &
February 23, 2015
Chief Executive Officer
Executive Vice President &
February 23, 2015
Chief Financial Officer
February 23, 2015
February 23, 2015
February 23, 2015
February 23, 2015
February 23, 2015
February 23, 2015
February 23, 2015
February 23, 2015
February 23, 2015
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
91
www.aam.com
21
www.aam.com
22