Quarterlytics / Consumer Defensive / Education & Training Services / American Public Education, Inc.

American Public Education, Inc.

apei · NASDAQ Consumer Defensive
Claim this profile
Ticker apei
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Consumer Defensive
Industry Education & Training Services
Employees 2493
← All annual reports
FY2014 Annual Report · American Public Education, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
111 WEST CONGRESS STREET‚ CHARLES TOWN‚ WEST VIRGINIA 25414 

www.americanpubliceducation.com

ADVANCING THE  
LEARNING EXPERIENCE.

EXPLORING NEW  
OPPORTUNITIES.

2014 Annual Report

ASHLEY CAVE
M.A., Management, AMU (2012) and Master of Public Health, AMU

ADVANCING THE  
LEARNING EXPERIENCE

American Public Education, Inc. (APEI) consists of American Public University  
System (APUS), which encompasses American Public University (APU) and  
American Military University (AMU); and National Education Seminars, Inc.,  
which we refer to as Hondros College of Nursing, our newest subsidiary.  
Together, these institutions serve more than 112,000 adult learners worldwide 
and offer more than 100 degree programs.

COVER PHOTO: AMU GRADUATE, CLASS OF 2014

Today, APEI is exploring new opportunities in higher education—by expanding 
into high-demand fields, building our healthcare platform and reaching out to 
more international students. Furthermore, we are creating a more advanced and 
differentiated learning experience by using new interactive technologies that 
engage students, improve collaboration and promote academic success—to fulfill 
our institutional mission.

EXPLORING NEW  
OPPORTUNITIES

GREGG THOMPSON, MSN, BSN, RN  
Nursing Faculty, Hondros College of Nursing

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS,

American Public Education, Inc. is built on a fundamental commitment to 
helping students achieve their potential. Toward that end, we are dedicated 
to providing learning experiences that are innovative and relevant in order 
to promote student-centered learning, engagement, collaboration and 
achievement. We strive to be the most respected provider of academic 
programs and education services, and to serve all our stakeholders with 
distinction—our students, our strategic partners, our shareholders and 
the broader community. 

We take great pride in the fundamental strength of our 
institutions. APUS has established a reputation for academic 
quality and affordability, offering an unparalleled value to 
adult learners. As the first online, for-profit institution to 
receive the prestigious Ralph E. Gomory Award for best 
practices from the Online Learning Consortium (OLC), APUS 
continues to earn recognition for the quality of its programs. 
In 2014, APUS received an unprecedented fourth Effective 
Practice award from OLC for a project to help students 
develop academic research skills and, in early 2015, was 
ranked in the top 10% among online undergraduate degree 
programs by U.S. News & World Report. 

AMU is a leading institution serving the U.S. military 
community. In 2015, Military Times magazine ranked AMU 
the number one school serving active duty military and the 
number nine school serving veterans. We believe AMU’s 
reputation in military-affiliated communities helped drive  
a 9% year-over-year increase in net course registrations by 
students using Veteran’s Administration benefits in 2014. 

facility in Cleveland, Ohio; added new evening and weekend 
classes at both its Cleveland and Columbus campuses; and 
prepared for a transition of its online classrooms to the Sakai 
Learning Management System, which is used by APUS. Further-
more, the college enhanced its outreach efforts through a new 
awareness campaign, a social media presence, and an outreach 
strategy based on building relationships, an approach similar 
to that of APUS. In 2014, compared to the prior year, Hondros 
College of Nursing achieved enrollment growth of 11% and 
new student enrollment growth of 16%, setting the stage for 
a great future.

APEI faced a number of challenges in 2014, including increased 
competition from both traditional and online universities; an 
uncertain regulatory environment; and changes to the military’s 
Voluntary Education Program, which contributed to an overall 
decline in APUS enrollments. Although net course registrations 
for APUS declined 1% year-over-year in 2014, APEI achieved 
year-over-year revenue growth of 6.2%, due to the inclusion  
of the results from Hondros College of Nursing (acquired on 
November 1, 2013). 

We are pleased with the progress of our new campus-based 
institution, Hondros College of Nursing. In 2014, the college 
completed a move to a larger, more visible and accessible 

Within our institutions, our aim is not simply to reach more 
students, but to enroll more qualified students and to help 

2

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.

DR. WALLACE E. BOSTON

President and Chief Executive Officer

them achieve success. I am pleased to report that, at the 
APUS spring 2014 commencement exercises, we celebrated 
a record class of more than 10,000 AMU and APU graduates 
and conferred degrees on the 430 graduate students and 
580 undergraduates who attended the ceremony—a 
tremendous accomplishment for these students and for APEI. 

A STRATEGY FOR THE FUTURE
We have set a clear course for the future. Our strategy is 
twofold. First, we are developing an advanced learning 
environment that we believe will enable us to continue to 
attract, engage and retain students and help them achieve 
their goals. Second, we are diversifying into high-demand 
fields and expanding into the international market to create 
new opportunities for growth. In support of our strategic 
objectives, we continue to innovate—by exploring new ways 
to promote persistence and student success, by investing in 
new technologies and by building strategic partnerships. In 
2014, we made significant progress toward these goals.

Developing an Advanced Learning Environment and 

Improving Persistence. Today’s students live in a digital 
world. We believe the classroom of the future, whether 

online or on campus, will be a collaborative environment that 
incorporates digital media and interactive tools to enhance the 
learning experience, engage learners and improve persistence. 
To set us apart from other institutions and further improve 
student outcomes, we expect to continue investing in new 
technologies to increase the interactivity and appeal of 
courses at APUS by adding new rich media, simulations, 
gamification and other enhancements. In 2014, we partnered 
with a game-based learning company that develops education 
software; and we began a collaboration with the University 
of Central Florida’s Institution for Simulation and Training 
and Mixed Emerging Technology Integration Lab on a 
simulation development project with student and faculty  
of the E2i (Engage to Innovate) Creative Studio partnership. 
We also launched our first MOOC (Massively Open Online 
Course), a course in International Politics developed in 
partnership with the Policy Studies Organization. 

In 2014, we made progress toward improving persistence and 
student success. We put new processes in place within APUS 
to identify at-risk students in the early weeks of classes, and 
we piloted ClearPath, a new Learning Relationship Manage-
ment (LRM) system developed by Fidelis, a company in which 

2014 ANNUAL REPORT

3

AMU & APU   as of December 31, 2014

HONDROS COLLEGE OF NURSING   as of December 31, 2014

46,000+ Alumni
111,000 Students

800+ Alumni
1,470 Students

we have a minority investment. APUS is the first university to 
deploy ClearPath, a social media tool that encourages collabo-
ration, mutual support and engagement. The initial results of 
this pilot, which involved 5,000 students, were impressive 
across a variety of measures of performance and persistence. 
Based on these initial results, we plan to open ClearPath to all 
undergraduate APUS students in 2015. 

Building Strategic Partnerships. In addition to maintaining 
approximately 100 relationships with community colleges, 
APUS now serves more than 200 corporations, associations 
and other organizations through corporate and strategic 
outreach. These relationships continue to be an important 
way to effectively and affordably enhance our reputation, 
grow brand awareness and expand our base of qualified 
students. We work closely with our partners to provide 
education and training programs that support their strategic 
objectives, and to offer affordable educational opportunities 
as an added benefit to their employees. In 2014, we signed 
agreements with a number of new corporate partners, 
including Keurig-Green Mountain Coffee, The Hartford and 
Save-Mart, a West Coast grocery chain. We believe the 
students we attract through these partnerships possess a 
higher degree of college readiness and academic intent,  
on average.

Enhancing the Quality and Range of Our Programs. In 
2014, we continued to advance in the field of healthcare 
education through the expanded outreach and growing 
reputation of Hondros College of Nursing. Within APUS, 
enrollment in its STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering 

DANIEL L. WELSCH, PH.D. 
Program Director, Science, APUS
Ph.D., University of Virginia, Environmental Sciences

“ There are not many online universities that 
teach science at the same level that we do. 
Until recently, no one has been able to figure 
out how to translate lab experience, which is 
so integral to science education, to an online 
environment. We have—and we are actually 
doing it in a very unique way. APUS is changing 
and improving the way science is being taught.” 

4

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.

STRONG REFERRALS AT APUS

45% 

of new students referred  
by others in 2014

45% 

of students return for  
a second degree1

1. Represents returning undergraduate students from 2012 conferrals.

AMU / APU  
GRADUATES

10,400
9,600

7,600

6,100

4,600

3,300

2,000

1,600

1,000

600 800

300

‘03

‘04

‘05

‘06

‘07

‘08

‘09

‘10

‘11

‘12

‘13

‘14

and Mathematics) programs—an area of national importance— 
increased approximately 10% year-over-year and now represents 
approximately 13% of our total enrollment. In 2014, APUS added 
new programs in high-demand fields such as Cybersecurity, 
Electrical Engineering and Public Policy; and, in January 2015, 
APUS launched a new dual master’s degree program in 
Homeland Security and Emergency & Disaster Management. 

The participation of APUS in the Lumina Foundation’s Degree  
Qualification Profile (DQP) initiative, which includes some 
400 participating colleges and universities, helps us improve 
and refine our degree programs. We are also engaged in 
two important collaborative initiatives—the three-year 
Gateways to Completion (G2C) program and the Foundations 
of Excellence program of the John N. Gardner Institute for 
Excellence in Undergraduate Education—aimed at improving 
quality and exploring new ways to improve persistence, 
particularly in high-enrollment gateway courses. As the first 
fully online program to participate in the Foundations of 
Excellence program, APUS has already implemented key 
initiatives recommended by the study group. APUS also 
participates in the Higher Learning Commission Academy 
for Student Persistence and Completion, a four-year study to 
help institutions increase persistence and graduation. As a 
member of the inaugural cohort of 20 institutions, we will 
be developing strategies directly aimed at improving 
student success. 

Exploring International Markets. In 2014, we launched 
two pilot programs aimed at expanding outreach to 
international students in order to increase the percentage  

of international students studying at APU. To help us  
reach our goals for international students, we entered into 
relationships with three New Horizons franchisees and 
several international education agents to provide information 
about APU to international students. New Horizons is an 
independent, global IT training company in which we have a 
minority investment. We are pleased by our relationship with 
and our investment in New Horizons, which has achieved 
profitability and continues to grow. 

In closing, I thank the faculty and staff of each of our 
institutions. Together, we accomplished a great deal in 
2014. I believe our progress reaffirms the strength of APEI 
as a recognized leader with the capability to address new 
opportunities in higher education. In the year ahead, we will 
continue to take steps to improve student success, increase 
the college readiness of incoming students and further 
differentiate our programs from the competition. Furthermore, 
we will continue to focus on providing unparalleled value, 
diversify and invest in technology to build the classroom of 
the future.

Dr. Wallace E. Boston 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
American Public Education, Inc.

2014 ANNUAL REPORT

5

EDUCATE.

Through a focus on teaching excellence, APUS has distin-
guished itself over the past two decades as a leading 
institution of higher learning that is committed to quality 
and value. As the first 100% online institution (and the first 
online, for-profit University) to be recognized by the Online 
Learning Consortium (OLC) for best practices in online 
education, APUS received an unprecedented fourth Effective 
Practice award from OLC in 2014. APUS has been named 
for the third consecutive year to U.S. News & World Report’s 

annual qualitative ranking of top online degree programs.  
In 2015, APUS ranked #27 nationally out of 292 schools 
evaluated which offer online bachelor’s degree programs, 
or in the top 10% overall—advancing seven places over its 
2014 ranking. 

We strive for excellence. Over the past two years, 22 APUS 
students and alumni have been named Presidential Man-
agement Fellowship finalists, and since 2008, four of our APUS 
staff members have received the prestigious Wagner Award 
for Distance Education. Our faculty of scholar-practitioners 
are leaders in their respective fields. In 2014, they published 
more than 500 books and papers; earned over 500 awards for 

6

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.

Of more than 46,000 alumni,  
3,000 have more than one  
degree from AMU/APU.

their professional practice, research and community service; 
and presented at more than 1,700 conferences, workshops 
and panels. Among the 97 degree programs offered at APUS, 
roughly half are highly specialized programs, such as Home-
land Security, Cybersecurity Studies and Transportation & 
Logistics Management, that differentiate our institution and 
attract a diverse array of motivated students. 

Today, APEI is building on the success of APUS by continuing 
to differentiate our programs; by expanding into growing 
fields such as healthcare, science and engineering; by 
increasing outreach to international students—and by 
delivering on our commitment to quality and value. 

B.S., Legal Studies, AMU (2013) and M.A., Security Management, AMU

JOHN MEIR 

“AMU is like being at a brick and mortar 
college, only better. I found out really quickly 
that an online education requires more  
dedication. You have to do the research. You 
have to do the writing. And you have to  
participate. So you learn more in-depth.“

A Patrol Supervisor with the Waynesville Police Department in Waynesville, Missouri, John Meir served for 24 years 

in the U.S. Army, including 12 deployments, and suffers from Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and Post-Traumatic Stress 

Disorder (PTSD). As part of the Patriot Paws program, he has a service dog, Apollo, that plays a tremendous role in 

helping him adjust to civilian life. Currently pursuing his second AMU degree, a Master’s in Security Management, 

Meir credits AMU with playing a role in his transition from military leadership to advancing in civilian management. 

2014 ANNUAL REPORT

7

ADVANCE.

APEI is committed to creating the classroom of the future. 
For example, APUS faculty works closely with our technology 
partners to develop course materials that are relevant to 
the curriculum, that promote rigorous problem-solving 
skills and that engage students. Through this process,  
we are not only strengthening our programs, but also  
driving new developments in education technology that 
may improve outcomes and create opportunities for  
future growth. 

Within APUS, we recently enhanced more than 50 courses 
with rich digital content that creates a stimulating, interac-
tive learning environment. We plan to redesign most of our 
courses over the next several months. Our new content is 
designed to be inquiry-based and project-driven, so as to 
further unleash the natural curiosity of students. At APUS, 
chemistry students conduct experiments in a virtual labo-
ratory that includes game-based learning and simulates the 
experience of a traditional laboratory. Geology students 
receive hands-on kits as part of their course materials that 
include rock and mineral samples for analysis. Throughout 
APUS science programs, students are now using digital 
instrumentation to gather, amass and analyze data. 

8

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.

ANEESAH AKBAR-UQDAH

M.A., Intelligence Studies, APU (2014)

“Taking classes at APU allowed me to engage 
with classmates from the Department of Defense 
and other agencies, advancing my interagency 
tactical competencies. Today, I work at the CDC in 
emergency response—where interagency cooper-
ation is critical to every mission accomplished.”

Aneesah Akbar-Uqdah graduated from APU in 2014 with a Master’s in Intelligence Studies. She also holds a Bachelor 

of Arts in Anthropology from Bryn Mawr College and a Master of Public Health in Health Policy and Management from 

Emory University. Her thesis appears in the Best Student Papers section of the APU library. Aneesah now works as a 

Public Health Analyst at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta and supports response efforts 

for the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Her responsibilities involve professional partnerships with the CDC’s new Global 

Health Security Division, the World Health Organization (WHO), the Department of Defense and the State Department.

We engage in a variety of collaborative partnerships to 
develop new learning technologies and course materials. For 
example, APUS participates in the Smart Science Network, 
a partnership with Smart Sparrow, an educational technology 
company partially funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates 
Foundation, whose aim is to develop the next generation  
of online science courses.

we expand our programs in the growing fields of Science, 
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Overall, 
we believe that our strategic investments and collaborative 
partnerships are enriching the classroom experience at 
APUS today—and opening new opportunities for APEI in 
the future.

Within APUS, we are finding innovative applications for 
new technology. We use networking tools to foster faculty 
collaboration and faculty-student interaction, and to promote 
engagement and persistence. We expect our evolving port-
folio of advanced learning technologies to be invaluable as 

2014 ANNUAL REPORT

9

ACHIEVE.

Our overarching goal is to help students achieve their  
full potential. Toward that end, we are involved in a wide 
range of research projects whose underlying aim is to  
improve distance learning and student outcomes. Our  
partners in this effort include the Lumina Foundation, the 
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institute for 
Learning Outcomes Assessment, The Higher Learning 
Commission and John Gardner Institute for Excellence in 
Undergraduate Education.

In 2014, a record 10,000 students earned graduate and  
undergraduate degrees from AMU and APU. We are taking 
steps to further improve success, particularly among new 
students in high-enrollment gateway courses. In 2014, we 
completed a successful pilot of the new ClearPath Learning 
Relationship Management (LRM) System, a social media 
tool that fosters engagement and collaboration. The results: 
ClearPath users, on average, completed the enrollment and 
transfer credit process at a higher rate, had lower with-
drawals and drops, exhibited a higher GPA in their initial 
courses, and registered for subsequent classes earlier than 
those in the larger student population. In 2015, we expect to 
open ClearPath  to all undergraduate APUS students as part 
of our ongoing effort to support their success.

10

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.

SARAH JACKSON 
PN (2013), ADN (2015), Hondros College of Nursing

Sarah Jackson was inspired to become a nurse during  
a mission trip to Bolivia. “I felt as though the Bolivians 
we met would have benefitted so much more if I’d  
had training in healthcare,” she says. Sarah recently 
graduated with a second degree from Hondros College 
of Nursing—an Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN).  
“It’s been a challenging and rewarding few years,” she 
says. “But with the range of clinical experience I’ve had 
here, I think I’ll be able to make a real difference in 
people’s lives.” 

ANTHONY SOTO 

B.A., Retail Management, APU (2013)

“The biggest benefit of getting my degree? 
It was seeing the pride and joy in my kids’ 
eyes—to see me study, to see me finish. I 
believe it’s engraved a sense of responsibility 
on them about the importance of doing your 
homework and getting an education.”

A Market Manager at Walmart in South Carolina, Anthony Soto earned his undergraduate degree through the Lifelong 

Learning program, our educational partnership with Walmart. Soto was able to apply prior college credit toward 

his degree, saving on tuition and reducing the time it took to finish. “When I heard about the program, I was pretty 

excited,” says Soto, a Walmart employee for 17 years. “I’d always thought about going back to school and getting my 

degree, but was challenged about the work/life balance. The Lifelong Learning program made it possible.”

2014 ANNUAL REPORT

11

EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP TEAM

FROM LEFT TO RIGHT:    Michael N. Netzer, Dr. Karan H. Powell, Harry T. Wilkins, CPA, Dr. Gwendolyn M. Hall, Richard W. Sunderland, CPA, Dr. Wallace E. Boston, Peter W. Gibbons,  

Carol S. Gilbert, Dr. Conrad D. Lotze, Michael P. Miotto

Dr. Wallace E. Boston* 
President and Chief Executive Officer; Member,  
Board of Trustees; Member, Board of Directors

Richard W. Sunderland, Jr., CPA*  
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Carol S. Gilbert* 
Executive Vice President, Programs and Marketing

Peter W. Gibbons* 
Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer

Dr. Gwendolyn M. Hall 
Senior Vice President and Associate Provost 

Dr. Conrad D. Lotze 
Senior Vice President and  
Associate Provost, Academic Affairs

Dr. Karan H. Powell* 
Executive Vice President and Provost

Michael P. Miotto 
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Harry T. Wilkins, CPA* 
Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer,  
American Public Education, Inc.; Chief Executive Officer, 
Hondros College of Nursing

Michael N. Netzer 
Senior Vice President and Associate Provost,  
Academic Program Development & Outreach 

Executive Leadership Team as of April 2015.

*Denotes executive officers for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act. 

12

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

[√]   Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

or

[  ]   Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission File Number: 001-33810

American Public Education, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 

01-0724376
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

111 West Congress Street 
Charles Town, West Virginia 25414 
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices) 

(304) 724-3700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class 
Common Stock, $.01 par Value 

Name of each exchange on which registered
The NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of class)

13

FORM 10-K 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities 
Act.  Yes  [  ]  No  [√ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the 
Act.  Yes  [  ]  No  [√ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such 
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   
Yes  [√ ]  No  [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website,  
if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this 
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such 
files).  Yes  [√ ]  No  [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of  
this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or 
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a 
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”  
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large  accelerated  filer  [√ ] 

    Accelerated  filer  [  ] 

    Non-accelerated  filer  [  ] 

    Smaller  reporting  company  [  ]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 
Yes  [  ]  No  [√ ]

The total number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 24, 2015, was 17,225,685.

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which 
the common equity was last sold as of June 30, 2014, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second 
fiscal quarter, was approximately $577 million. For purposes of this calculation, shares of common stock held by the Registrant’s 
chief executive officer, the Registrant’s chief financial officer, and the Registrant’s directors were excluded. Exclusion of such 
shares held by any person should not be construed to indicate that the person possesses the power, direct or indirect, to direct 
or cause the direction of the management or policies of the Registrant, or that the person is controlled by or under common 
control with the Registrant.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Certain portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (which is expected 
to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s 2014 fiscal year) are incorporated by reference 
into Part III of this Report.

14

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.INDEX

PART I

Item 1. 

Business 

Item 1A. 

Risk Factors 

Item 1B. 

Unresolved Staff Comments 

Item 2. 

Properties 

Item 3. 

Legal Proceedings 

Item 4. 

Mine Safety Disclosures 

PART II

Item 5. 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 

Item 6. 

Selected Financial Data 

Item 7. 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Item 7A. 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 

Item 8. 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 

Item 9. 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 

Item 9A. 

Controls and Procedures 

Item 9B. 

Other Information 

PART III

Item 10. 

Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance 

Item 11. 

Executive Compensation 

Item 12. 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 

Item 13. 

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence 

Item 14. 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services 

PART IV

Item 15. 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule 

17

59

96

96

97

97

98

100

102

123

124

151

151

155

156

156

156

157

157

158

15

FORM 10-KSpecial Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report, including the sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial 
Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Business,” contains forward-looking statements. We may, in some cases, use words 
such as “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “potentially,” “will,” 
or “may,” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements. 
Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report include, but are not limited to, statements about:

•  the pace of growth of our student enrollment and changes in the composition of our student body;

•  our ability to maintain, develop and grow our technology infrastructure to support a larger student body;

•  our conversion of prospective students to enrolled students and our retention of active students;

•  our ability to update and expand the content of existing programs and develop new programs in a cost-effective manner or 

on a timely basis;

•  our ability to integrate National Education Seminars, Inc., which we refer to as Hondros College of Nursing, into our opera-

tions and to use that acquisition to diversify and expand our programs;

•  our ability to leverage our investment in New Horizons Worldwide, Inc. to provide international students with greater access 

to our programs and to provide our students with new supportive technologies;

•  our maintenance and expansion of our relationships and partnerships with the United States Armed Forces, corporations and 

other organizations and the development of new relationships and partnerships;

•  actions by the Department of Defense or branches of the United States Armed Forces;

•  federal appropriations and other budgetary matters that affect the ability of our students to finance their education through 
programs administered by the Department of Education, the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs;

•  our ability to comply with the extensive regulatory framework applicable to our industry, including Title IV of the Higher 

Education Act of 1965, as amended, and the regulations thereunder, as well as state law and regulations and accrediting 
agency requirements;

•  the competitive environment in which we operate;

•  our cash needs and expectations regarding cash flow from operations;

•  our ability to manage, grow and diversify our business and execute our business and growth strategies; and

•  our financial performance generally.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee 
future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual 
results to differ materially from the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of 
this Annual Report. These important factors include those that we discuss in Item 1A “Risk Factors,” Item 7 “Management’s 
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere. You should read these factors and the 
other cautionary statements made in this Annual Report as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever 
they appear in this Annual Report. If one or more of these factors materialize, or if any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, 
our actual results, performance, or achievements may vary materially from any future results, performance, or achievements 
expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking 
statements after the date of this Annual Report, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as 
required by law.

16

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.PART I

Item 1.  Business
American Public Education, Inc., or APEI, provides online and on-campus postsecondary education to over 112,470 students 
through two subsidiary institutions. In this Annual Report, “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company” and similar terms refer to APEI and 
its subsidiary institutions collectively unless the context indicates otherwise.

This Item 1 of our Annual Report contains a Company Overview section that provides information regarding our subsidiary 
institutions, an explanation of our reporting segments, an overview of the postsecondary educational market and market 
opportunities, our competitive strengths, growth strategy, executive officers, the seasonality of our operations, and where 
investors can obtain available information. Item 1 also contains a section entitled “Our Institutions” that provides institution 
specific information regarding each of our two subsidiary institutions, and a section entitled “Regulatory Environment,” which 
contains information on some of the regulations that impact postsecondary educational institutions.

Company Overview

Subsidiary Institutions

Our institutions offer programs designed to prepare individuals for productive contributions to their professions and society, and 
to offer opportunities that may advance students in their current profession or help them prepare for their next career. Our 
wholly-owned operating subsidiary institutions include the following:

•  American Public University System, Inc., or APUS, provides online postsecondary education directed primarily at the needs 
of the military and public safety communities. APUS is an online university that includes American Military University, or 
AMU, and American Public University, or APU. APUS is regionally accredited by the Higher Learning Commission. APUS has 
approximately 111,000 students and offers 97 degree programs and 95 certificate programs in fields of study related to 
national security, military studies, intelligence, homeland security, criminal justice, technology, business administration, 
education, health science, and liberal arts. APUS employs approximately 420 full-time faculty members and 1,820 part-time 
faculty members.

Since APUS’s founding in 1991 as AMU, a distance learning graduate-level institution for military officers seeking an advanced 
degree in military studies, APUS has gradually broadened its focus to include other military communities, veterans, public safety, 
and certain other civilian professional communities. In 2002, AMU was reorganized into a single university system, APUS, with 
two components: AMU, which is focused on educating military students, and APU, which is focused on educating non-military 
students. As an online institution of higher learning, we believe APUS is well-suited to meet the needs of its military students 
who serve in positions requiring extended and irregular work schedules, are on-call for rapid response missions, participate in 
extended deployments and exercises, travel or relocate frequently or have limited financial resources. Although APUS’s focus 
has broadened, APUS continues to have an emphasis on its relationship with the military community. As of December 31, 2014, 
approximately 52% of APUS’s students self-reported that they served in the military on active duty at the time of initial 
enrollment. The remainder of APUS’s students were military-affiliated professionals (such as veterans, reservists or National 
Guard members), public safety professionals (such as law-enforcement personnel or other first responders) and other civilians 
(such as working adult students).

•  National Education Seminars, Inc., which we refer to as Hondros College of Nursing, or HCON, provides nursing education to 
students at four campuses in the State of Ohio, as well as online, to serve the needs of the nursing and healthcare commu-
nity. HCON’s programs are offered in a quarterly format to approximately 1,470 students.

17

FORM 10-KHCON offers a Diploma in Practical Nursing and an Associate Degree in Nursing at its Ohio campuses, which are located in the 
suburban areas of Cincinnati, Columbus, Dayton and Cleveland. HCON also offers an online Registered Nurse to Bachelor of 
Science in Nursing completion program, which we refer to as the RN-to-BSN Program, predominantly to students in Ohio. HCON 
is nationally accredited by the Accrediting Council of Independent Colleges and Schools and the RN-to-BSN Program is accred-
ited by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education. HCON’s locations and programs are approved by the Ohio State Board 
of Career Colleges and Schools and the RN-to-BSN Program is approved by the Ohio Board of Regents. In addition, the Diploma 
in Practical Nursing and Associate Degree in Nursing programs are approved by the Ohio Board of Nursing. HCON employs 
approximately 100 full-time faculty members and 50 part-time faculty members.

We acquired HCON on November 1, 2013. Our acquisition of HCON is consistent with our long-term strategic plan to diversify 
our education business and expand further into health science and technology focused programs. We believe HCON will 
potentially serve as a platform for future healthcare related program expansion. The HCON acquisition was completed for an 
adjusted aggregate purchase price of approximately $46.8 million. We assumed no long-term debt related to the acquisition 
of HCON.

Our Reporting Segments

Our operations are organized into two reporting segments:

•  American Public Education Segment, or APEI Segment. This segment reflects our historical operations prior to the 
acquisition of HCON and reflects the operational activities of APUS, other corporate activities, and minority investments.

•  Hondros College of Nursing Segment, or HCON Segment. This segment reflects the operational activities of HCON. 
We acquired HCON on November 1, 2013, and therefore the consolidated results for periods prior to November 1, 2013 do 
not include any results from HCON.

Our consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased to $350.0 million from $329.5 million in the year 
ended December 31, 2013. Net income was $40.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to net income of 
$42.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Financial information regarding each of our reporting segments is reported 
in this Annual Report in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Selected 
Financial Data,” and “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Postsecondary Education Market Structure and Market Opportunities

Today, the U.S. postsecondary education market comprises more than 4,000 colleges and universities serving both traditional 
college-aged students and adult learners. The market is highly fragmented with institutions varying by geography, program 
offerings, delivery method, ownership, affordability, level of academic quality and selectivity of admissions. No single institution 
holds a significant proportion of the overall postsecondary education market.

We believe that growth opportunities may exist for institutions that can better meet changing consumer expectations, despite 
demographics and economic conditions that are slowing near term demand. We also believe that many students are seeking an 
educational value that offers them the programs they want, at a competitive price, in an engaging and often mobile format that 
will support their immediate and long-term career aspirations, and that employers are seeking to hire graduates with competen-
cies aligned to their needs. Thus, institutions, such as ours, with affordable pricing, flexible delivery, and a robust catalog of 
strong online offerings aligned to workforce needs are well-positioned to address the current challenges and to meet the 
demands of a connected and mobile society.

18

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.We believe that with nearly 2.2 million active-duty military and reservists, the U.S. Armed Forces will continue to be a 
significant market for online education even with planned troop drawdowns. Because of their irregular schedules, geographic 
mobility and access to tuition assistance funding, we believe service members will continue to seek respected universities 
that provide military-focused support services coupled with online curriculum that is designed to prepare graduates for career 
advancement. As part of their longstanding tradition, military leaders often encourage service members to capitalize on their 
earned education benefits, and to enhance their qualifications through the military’s compensation, promotion, assignment, 
and performance systems.

At the same time, elected and private-industry leaders are heavily promoting new policies and campaigns to facilitate the hiring 
of veterans, with a priority on placing individuals who are transitioning from military service to the private sector. As these 
policies lower barriers to nonmilitary jobs and federal contracts for veteran-owned businesses, postsecondary distance universi-
ties offer valuable educational opportunities for military constituents regardless of where they live, work and learn.

The Department of Defense (DoD) uniform tuition assistance policy offers service members a variety of affordable education 
and financial aid options. Additionally, veterans (and certain service members) are entitled to educational benefits from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). For more information, refer to “Our Institutions” and “Regulatory Environment—Student 
Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements.”

Similar to the U.S. military community, we believe our nation’s public service professionals need access to affordable and 
flexible education that fits their changing schedules. More and more, we believe leadership advancement within many public 
service agencies requires an advanced degree. Often these professionals have extended and shifting schedules preventing 
them from attending traditional or in-class programs. Many traditional institutions lack the broad selection of degrees, certifica-
tions, or concentrations that are specifically relevant to public service careers. APUS fills this void by offering a broad array of 
industry-specific programs that are continually assessed against learning outcomes, and enhanced through guidance and input 
from selected industry leaders.

On a national level the expanding healthcare sector is driving demand for nursing education. According to the U.S. Bureau of 
Labor Statistics’ Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2014-15 Edition, job opportunities for registered nurses are expected to grow 
approximately 19% over the next 10 years, faster than the average growth for all occupations. Despite anticipated growth in job 
opportunities, a 2014 report from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing stated that over 53,000 qualified applications 
were not accepted by entry-level baccalaureate programs at nursing schools in 2013. These statistics suggest there may be 
unmet demand from qualified students for on-campus and online nursing educational programs. These statistics may not be 
indicative of demand on a regional or local level, including in Ohio.

Our institutions continue to face significant competition and other challenges related to federal policies governing education 
providers and financial aid. Most public institutions are aided by substantial government subsidies. Public and private nonprofit 
institutions benefit from government and foundation grants, in addition to tax-exempt status, tax-deductible contributions, and 
other financial resource not widely available to for-profit institutions. Many public competitors benefit from longstanding name 
recognition, and they are able to directly recruit students more cost-effectively, especially in their local markets. In addition, 
competitors are upgrading the way they deliver their academic programs, which involves a variety of traditional, blended, and 
asynchronous learning platforms. Several institutions are shifting their delivery models to include a mix of traditional, nontradi-
tional, credit-bearing and non-credit-bearing education programs, and massively open online courses (MOOCs) offered at little  
to no cost. This trend is accelerating as many institutions realign and adopt the flexible and cost-effective benefits that online 
education offers the modern learner.

19

FORM 10-KOur Competitive Strengths

We believe our institutions demonstrate the following competitive strengths:

•  Academic Excellence. We are committed to continually assessing and enhancing our academic programs and our student 
services to support successful outcomes for our students and graduates. APUS invests significant resources to provide 
strong academic programs and educational support to its learning community. APUS’s academic program offerings are 
overseen by an independent Board of Trustees that includes former college presidents, active accreditation evaluators, a 
former Commandant of the Marine Corps, a former Navy Admiral, and a former Department of the Army Inspector General. 
Additionally, APUS utilizes Industry Advisory Councils (IACs) to evaluate and inform the overall and program-specific 
academic learning strategy. This facilitates efforts to connect APUS’s curriculum to the industry and students it serves. 
Similarly, HCON focuses on educational support by hiring experienced industry professionals while enhancing student 
services to assist students with courses, labs, and clinical offerings. HCON’s faculty includes individuals with research  
and teaching experience, and specialized nursing credentials.

•  Affordable Tuition. The combined tuition, fees, and books at APUS are less expensive for undergraduate and graduate 

students than the average in-state cost at a public university. APUS’s undergraduate tuition is covered 100% by DoD tuition 
assistance and graduate tuition is 80% covered. Although APUS has not increased undergraduate tuition since 2000, it 
currently plans to increase graduate and undergraduate tuition, in the range of 5% to 8%, in the second half of 2015. To 
support its active duty military students, APUS will continue providing a tuition grant that will keep their cost of tuition at 
approximately its current level. APUS remains committed to affordability. Tuition, fees, and books at HCON are also designed 
to be affordable and competitive with those of other similar institutions offering the same level of flexibility, accessibility, 
and student experience.

•  Online Higher Education and Diverse Program Offerings. APUS designs courses and programs specifically for online 
delivery. APUS recruits and prepares its faculty exclusively to deliver engaging online instruction. Because students are 
located worldwide, APUS focuses on providing asynchronous, interactive education to students that fits their busy lives. 
APUS offers 97 degree programs in fields ranging from homeland security, space studies, and emergency and disaster 
management, to liberal arts and electrical engineering. HCON currently offers a diploma program and an associate degree 
program at its physical campuses, in addition to its online RN-to-BSN program.

•  APUS’s Effective Student Support Systems and Data-Driven Decision-Making. APUS has developed proprietary 
information systems and processes to support what we refer to as Partnership At a Distance™ (PAD). PAD is APUS’s patented 
approach to interacting with APUS’s students. PAD is an information system that we believe enables APUS to recognize that 
every student is unique and to provide support from pre-enrollment through and beyond graduation. PAD is the system APUS 
utilizes for, among other things, student advising, administrative support, and community networking. PAD provides the 
flexibility to maintain a highly-engaged partnership with learners based on their preferences. We believe that PAD enables 
APUS to scale and continuously improve the quality of our academic offerings and student support. Through PAD, students may 
access admissions, orientation, course registrations, tuition payments, book requests, grades, transcripts, and degree progress.

Growth Strategy

We believe our institutions’ growth in student enrollment and revenue has been driven primarily by high student satisfaction 
and referral rates, by the affordability of our institutions’ tuition and by the type of the degree programs offered. Between 2012 
and 2014, we grew our consolidated revenue 11.6% from $313.5 million to $350.0 million. Our revenues increased by 6.2% from 
$329.5 million in 2013 to $350.0 million in 2014, largely due to the inclusion of revenue from HCON. To grow our revenues and 
improve our financial performance, we plan to employ the following strategies:

•  Maintain Our Leading Position in the Military Market. APUS has always focused on the needs of the U.S. military 

community since being founded as American Military University. The combination of our online model, focused curriculum, 
and outreach to military communities enables APUS to gain market share from more established schools, many of which are 

20

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.traditional schools offering on-campus instruction that have served the military market for longer periods. APUS remains 
firmly committed to providing exceptional service and support to the military community. One example of this commitment 
and the resources dedicated to it is APUS’s Virtual Veterans Center, which is an online information repository, a gateway to 
personalized support services, and a gathering place for veteran and active-duty students and alumni. It provides users with 
branch-specific discussion boards, career services, academic advising, Student Veterans of America chapter information, and 
a range of other resources.

•  Broaden APUS’s Acceptance in the Civilian Market. APUS designs its curriculum to be relevant to public safety 

professionals and civilian professionals with extended and irregular work schedules, and other adult learners. We believe 
that today’s adult students, regardless of their specific career requirements, are looking for a highly-tailored educational 
experience that prepares them for success. While APUS’s quality, affordable, and diverse academic offerings are highly 
attractive options for students, we are also striving to meet an increasing demand to provide learning-on-the-go that 
enables students to choose their own course curriculum, pace, level of support, and credentials.

•  Add New Degree Programs at Our Institutions. Over the long term, we intend for our institutions to continue expanding 
their degree offerings to meet student needs and marketplace demands, with a focus on new programs in fields exhibiting 
higher than average growth. Our acquisition of HCON, and the type of program offerings at HCON, reflect this strategy. 
APUS is also preparing, academically and culturally, to potentially offer doctoral programs beginning in the next few years.

•  Pursue and Expand Strategic Partnerships. We believe that articulation agreements and partnerships with other 

institutions of higher learning, corporations, professional associations, and other organizations are important to institutional 
performance, enrollment growth and expanding access to higher education. We plan for our institutions to continue pursuing 
such relationships.

•  Explore International and Other Opportunities for APUS. APUS is developing partnerships, investments, and other 
initiatives aimed at expanding international access to its affordable online programs, and intends to actively market its 
programs in international markets. The objective is to increase the diversity of APUS’s student population, enhance the 
learning environment, and diversify revenues. We plan to pursue other relationships, partnerships, and business opportuni-
ties to expand our international reach, including the development of new corporate training programs and non-degree 
certifications. We believe our investment in New Horizons Worldwide, Inc., or New Horizons, a global information technology 
training company, may yield opportunities to provide international students greater access to APUS’s information technology 
programs and other similar programs.

•  Innovative Education Technology. APUS has developed proprietary technologies and systems to enhance student 
services, classroom instruction, learning outcomes, and the overall student experience. To further improve student out-
comes, satisfaction rates, access, our institutional efficiency and our brand differentiation, we are focused on providing a 
unique and advanced learning environment, including through enhancing our existing technologies and investing in emerging 
technologies and companies. For example, as a result of our investment in Fidelis Education, Inc., or Fidelis Education, we 
pursued a pilot program to provide students with access to Fidelis Education’s ClearPath system. The ClearPath system is 
designed to help online students interact with faculty and staff in meaningful ways outside the classroom, to improve 
persistence, and help students successfully prepare for career transitions. We expect to open the ClearPath system for all 
new APUS students during 2015 and transition current and returning students to the ClearPath system by the end of 2015.

•  Improve Student Persistence. Our ability to increase enrollment depends largely on our ability to attract new students 
and provide them with an effective university experience. We are focused on increasing the percentage of our students 
that are prepared for the rigors of higher education, successfully complete courses and graduate from our programs. We 
have launched several new projects at APUS to accomplish these goals, including initiatives to attract new college-ready 
students, increasing the level of engagement and collaboration in the classroom, and launching new classroom interventions 
to help students succeed academically. In addition, we research and explore new ways to improve student persistence and 
academic quality through collaborative initiatives with non-profit organizations and other universities.

21

FORM 10-KTo assist us in achieving elements of our growth strategy and further develop our business capabilities, we will continue to 
research and assess strategic investments and acquisitions. Future strategic investments or acquisitions could include invest-
ments in partnerships or joint ventures with, or the acquisition of, other schools, service providers, or education technology- 
related companies. Examples of our recent investments and acquisitions include:

•  Hondros College of Nursing. In November 2013, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of National 

Education Seminars, Inc., which we refer to as HCON, for an approximate adjusted aggregate purchase price of $46.8 million. 
As described more fully elsewhere in this annual report, HCON offers the Diploma in Practical Nursing, the Associate Degree 
in Nursing, and the online registered nurse to Bachelor of Science in Nursing completion program.

•  New Horizons Worldwide, Inc. In September 2012, we made a $6.8 million equity investment and a $6.0 million debt 

investment in a holding company that acquired New Horizons, a global information technology training company operating 
over 300 locations around the world through franchise arrangements in approximately 45 states and 70 countries. In connec-
tion with the investment we acquired approximately 19.9% of the fully diluted equity of New Horizons and are entitled to 
certain rights, including rights to representation on the Board of Directors of the holding company. In December 2014, New 
Horizons prepaid the $6.0 million loan we made in connection with the investment transaction.

•  Fidelis Education, Inc. In February 2013, we made a $4.0 million investment in preferred stock of Fidelis Education, 

representing approximately 21.6% of its fully diluted equity. Fidelis Education is developing a technology platform that will 
assist working adult students with education advising and career mentoring services as they pursue college degrees. In 
connection with the investment, APEI is entitled to certain rights, including the right to representation on the Board of 
Directors of Fidelis Education.

For additional information regarding these and our other investments and acquisitions, please refer to the “Financial Statements 
and Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Set forth below is certain information concerning our executive officers:

Name

Age

Position

Dr. Wallace E. Boston
Carol S. Gilbert
Dr. Karan Powell
Richard W. Sunderland, Jr., CPA
Dr. Sharon van Wyk
Harry T. Wilkins, CPA

Peter W. Gibbons

60
56
61
54
55
58

62

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Executive Vice President, Marketing
Executive Vice President, Provost of APUS
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer
Executive Vice President, Chief Development Officer and  

Chief Executive Officer of HCON

Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer

Dr. Wallace E. Boston joined us in September 2002 as Chief Financial Officer and, since June 2004, has served as President, 
Chief Executive Officer, and a member of our Board of Directors. From August 2001 to April 2002, Dr. Boston served as Chief 
Financial Officer of Sun Healthcare Group. From July 1998 to May 2001, Dr. Boston served as Chief Operating Officer and, later, 
President of NeighborCare, Inc. From February 1993 to May 1998, Dr. Boston served as Vice President of Finance and later, 
Senior Vice President of Acquisitions and Development of Manor Healthcare Corporation, now Manor Care, Inc. From  
November 1985 to December 1992, Dr. Boston served as Chief Financial Officer of Meridian Healthcare.

22

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Carol S. Gilbert joined us in May 2004 as Vice President, Programs and Marketing, was promoted to Senior Vice President, 
Marketing in January 2005 and was promoted to Executive Vice President, Marketing in January 2009. From August 1998 to 
October 2003, Ms. Gilbert served as Brand Vice President at Marriott International where she led the strategic planning efforts 
for the SpringHill Suites’ brand and directed business and marketing strategies for the Fairfield Inn brand, including the launch  
of the Fairfield Inn & Suites brand extension. From April 1996 to October 1997, Ms. Gilbert served as Vice President, Strategic 
Planning at Choice Hotels International (formerly owned by Manor Care, Inc.). From February 1991 to April 1996, Ms. Gilbert 
served as Senior Director, Marketing Strategy of Manor Care, Inc.

Dr. Karan Powell joined the Company in April 2004 as Interim Chancellor after serving on the Board of Trustees for two years. 
From October 2005 to December 2005, Dr. Powell served as the Dean of the School of Business, Management and Graduate 
studies. From January 2006 to July 2008, Dr. Powell served as Vice President and Academic Dean. In July 2008, Dr. Powell 
was promoted to Senior Vice President and served as Senior Vice President and Academic Dean until July 2011. Dr. Powell 
was promoted to Executive Vice President and Provost in August 2011. In 2010, Dr. Powell was invited to be a board member 
of Higher Education Resource Services (HERS) and she was elected to the HERS executive board as Secretary in 2014. From 
2011 to 2012, Dr. Powell served as Chair of the HERS’ 40th Anniversary Committee, and in 2012, was appointed as Program 
Committee Chair. Dr. Powell was elected to the Board for the Association of Chief Academic Officers in 2014 and has served on 
the Board of Trustees for Garrison Forest School in Baltimore, Maryland since 2012. Between 1988 and 2007, Dr. Powell served 
at Georgetown University in various roles, including Director of Professional Development in the School of Continuing Education, 
Director of Organization Development Programs, and Director of IRS Executive Development Program. While at Georgetown 
University, Dr. Powell also served as an Executive Instructor at the School of Business.

Richard W. Sunderland, Jr., CPA joined us in February 2011 as a consultant and became Senior Vice President of Finance  
at APUS in December 2012. Effective January 1, 2014, Mr. Sunderland was appointed as Executive Vice President and Chief 
Financial Officer of APEI. Prior to joining APUS, Mr. Sunderland served as the Chief Financial Officer of NovaSom, Inc. from 2008 
to 2010. In addition, Mr. Sunderland served as Chief Financial Officer of Active Day, Inc. between 2005 and 2008, and in various 
roles, including as Controller, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, at NeighborCare, Inc. from 1993 to 2004.

Dr. Sharon van Wyk joined the Company in August 2009 as Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer. From March 
2006 to April 2008, Dr. van Wyk served as Vice President of Process Excellence, Infrastructure & Online Customer Support at 
Intuit Inc. From 2001 to 2006, Dr. van Wyk served as Vice President of Process Excellence and New Market Development for 
Genworth Financial. From 1996 to 2001, Dr. van Wyk served as Manager, Global Risk Management and Six Sigma for GE Capital. 
From 1988 to 1996, Dr. van Wyk served as Associate Partner, Change Management for Accenture Consulting. Dr. van Wyk was 
an adjunct professor for the Executive MBA program at the University of Connecticut Business School and possesses several 
process improvement certifications including Master Black Belt and Six Sigma Instructor.

Harry T. Wilkins, CPA joined us in February 2007 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Effective January 1, 
2014, Mr. Wilkins was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer of APEI and Chief Executive Officer of 
APEI’s subsidiary National Education Seminars, Inc., which operates HCON. From December 2004 to February 2007, Mr. Wilkins 
served as a member of our Board of Directors, and from January 2005 to February 2007, he served on the Board of Trustees of 
APUS. Since 2002, Mr. Wilkins has also served as a founding partner of Grandizio, Wilkins, Little & Matthews, LLP, a Baltimore-
based CPA firm that specializes in consulting for postsecondary education clients. From May 1992 to August 2001, Mr. Wilkins 
served as Chief Financial Officer of Strayer Education, Inc. From November 1984 to April 1992, Mr. Wilkins served as Director at 
Wooden & Benson, an accounting firm specializing in audits of education companies. From January 1979 to November 1984, Mr. 
Wilkins served as a senior consultant with Deloitte, Haskins and Sells, now Deloitte & Touche.

23

FORM 10-KPeter W. Gibbons joined us in October 2002 as Vice President, Student Services and became Senior Vice President, Chief 
Operating Officer in January 2005. In May 2007, Mr. Gibbons’ title was changed to Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative 
Officer. From June 2000 to October 2002, Mr. Gibbons served as Vice President, Human Resources for Sitel Corporation. From May 
1975 to June 2000, Mr. Gibbons served as a field artillery officer in the United States Army. Mr. Gibbons commanded soldiers in 
combat, held senior staff positions at the Department of Army, and taught at the United States Military Academy for three years.

Seasonality

Our quarterly results fluctuate and, therefore, the results in any quarter may not represent the results we may achieve in any 
subsequent quarter or full year. Our revenues and operating results normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal or other variations 
in our enrollments. Our student population varies as a result of new enrollments, graduations, student attrition, the success of 
our marketing programs, and other reasons that we cannot always anticipate. We expect quarterly fluctuations in operating 
results to continue as a result of various enrollment patterns.

Available Information About Us

APEI was incorporated in Delaware in 2002, as the successor to a Virginia corporation incorporated in 1991. Our website is 
www.americanpubliceducation.com. The information on our website is expressly not incorporated by reference in this Annual 
Report on Form 10-K. We make available, free of charge through our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly 
Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 
13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the 
SEC. In addition to visiting our website, you may read and copy materials we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
or SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, NE, Washington DC 20549, or at www.sec.gov. You may obtain 
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

Our Institutions
We provide postsecondary education through two subsidiary institutions, APUS and HCON. Our institutions are licensed or 
otherwise authorized by state authorities, or are in the process of obtaining such licenses or authorizations, to offer postsec-
ondary education programs to the extent the institutions believe such licenses or authorizations are required, and are certified 
by the United States Department of Education, or ED, to participate in student financial aid programs authorized under Title IV  
of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or Title IV programs.

American Public University System

APUS is regionally accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, or HLC, and is based in Charles Town, West Virginia. In 2002, 
APUS was organized into a single university system, with two component universities, AMU, which is focused on appealing to 
military students, and APU, which is focused on appealing to non-military students. APUS traces its roots to AMU, which was 
founded as a distance learning graduate-level institution for military officers seeking an advanced degree in military studies. APUS 
has gradually broadened its focus to include other military communities, veterans, public safety, and certain other non-military 
communities. APUS is an online institution of higher learning, which we believe is well-suited to its students, especially its 
military students, who serve in positions requiring extended and irregular work schedules, are on-call for rapid response 
missions, participate in extended deployments and exercises, travel or relocate frequently and have limited financial resources.

Although APUS’s focus has broadened, it continues to have an emphasis on its relationship with the military community. As of 
December 31, 2014, approximately 52% of APUS’s students self-reported that they served in the military on active duty at the 
time of initial enrollment. The remainder of APUS’s students are military-affiliated professionals (such as veterans, reservists or 
National Guard members), public safety professionals (such as law-enforcement personnel or other first responders) and other 
civilians (such as working adult students).

24

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Curriculum and Scheduling

APUS offers 192 degree and certificate programs. Academic terms begin on the first Monday of each month, with nearly 2,200 
classes in over 1,200 unique courses that are offered in either eight- or sixteen-week formats. APUS’s programs are as follows:

Programs

Masters Degrees
Bachelors Degrees
Associates Degrees
Total Degree Programs

Certificates

Graduate
Undergraduate
Total Certificates
TOTAL PROGRAMS AND CERTIFICATES

Number

  32
  43
  22
  97

Number

  44
  51
  95
192

At the graduate level, APUS offers programs in the following fields of study:

Master of Arts in:

Criminal Justice

Intelligence Studies

National Security Studies

Emergency Management and  

International Relations and  

Political Science

Disaster Management

Conflict Resolution

Entrepreneurship

History

Homeland Security

Humanities

Master of Education1 in:

Legal Studies

Management

Military History

Military Studies

Psychology

Reverse Logistics Management

Security Management

Transportation Management  

and Logistics

Educational Leadership

School Counseling

Teaching

Master of Public Administration

Master of Public Health

Master of Public Policy

Master of Science in:

Accounting

Information Technology

Sports Management

Cybersecurity Studies

Space Studies

Environmental Policy and Management

Sports and Health Sciences

1. 

In December 2014, APUS determined that it will no longer enroll new students in any of its initial education licensure programs. APUS will 
continue to enroll new students in its post-licensure education programs.

25

FORM 10-KAt the undergraduate level, APUS offers programs in the following fields of study:

Bachelor of Arts in:

Criminal Justice

Hospitality Management

Political Science

Emergency and Disaster  

Human Development and  

Management

English

Entrepreneurship

General Studies

Government Contracting  

and Acquisition

History

Homeland Security

Family Studies

Intelligence Studies

International Relations

Management

Marketing

Middle Eastern Studies

Military History

Philosophy

Psychology

Religion

Retail Management

Reverse Logistics Management

Security Management

Sociology

Transportation and Logistics 

Management

Bachelor of Business Administration

Bachelor of Science in:

Accounting

Information System Security

Criminal Justice—Forensics

Information Technology

Nursing

Public Health

Cybersecurity

Electrical Engineering

Environmental Science

Information Technology Management

Space Studies

Legal Studies

Mathematics

Sports and Health Sciences

Sports Management

Fire Science Management

Natural Sciences

Associate of Arts in:

Business Administration

General Studies

Communication

Counter-Terrorism Studies

Criminal Justice

History

Hospitality

Management

Early Childhood Care and Education

Military History

Associate of Applied Science in Health Sciences

Real Estate Studies

Retail Management

Weapons of Mass Destruction 

Preparedness

Associate of Science in:

Accounting

Explosive Ordnance Disposal

Computer Applications

Fire Science

Database Application Development

Paralegal Studies

Public Health

Web Publishing

APUS’s certificate programs generally consist of a minimum of 18 semester hours and focus on a particular component of a 
broader degree program. Students may earn discrete certificates or earn certificates in combination with work toward a degree 
program. APUS also offers several Learning Tracks comprised of one two-week “Classroom Success” orientation course about 

26

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.online learning, and three academic courses in a related area of interest. A Learning Track allows students to pursue a course of 
study without having to commit to a degree or certificate program.

Enrollment and Student Body

The active student body of APUS consists of approximately 111,000 students, most of whom hold full-time employment. Active 
students are defined as those who have completed a course in the past twelve months, or are currently enrolled or registered 
for an upcoming course. APUS disenrolls students who fail to register for and complete at least one course in a calendar year, 
although students may apply for re-admission and active status. Students on extended military deployments may apply for a 
program hold, which keeps such students active until they return and are able to resume their studies.

Accreditation

APUS is regionally accredited by HLC which accredits degree-granting institutions located in a 19-state region, including West 
Virginia, and is recognized by ED. The status and meaning of this institutional accreditation is described more fully below in 
“Regulatory Environment—Accreditation.”

In addition to institutional accreditation by HLC, certain programs offered by APUS have received specialized accreditations or 
professional recognition. For example, the Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs, or ACBSP, accredits the 
following programs:

•  Associate of Science, Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Accounting;

•  Associate of Arts, Bachelor and Master of Business Administration;

•  Associate of Arts and Bachelor of Arts in Hospitality Management;

•  Associate of Arts, Bachelor of Arts, and Master of Arts in Management;

•  Associate of Arts in Real Estate Studies;

•  Associate of Arts and Bachelor of Arts in Retail Management;

•  Bachelor of Arts in Marketing; and

•  Bachelor and Master of Arts in Transportation and Logistics Management.

The Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education, or CCNE, accredits the Bachelor of Science in Nursing. Furthermore, APUS has 
obtained professional recognition for its Management program concentrations in Human Resources from the Society for Human 
Resource Management, certain courses in the Sports and Health Sciences program from the American Sport Education Program 
for Bronze Level Certification and the National Academy of Sports Medicine Performance Enhancement Specialist, for the Information 
Systems Security program from the National Security Agency—Information Assurance Courseware Evaluation, and certain 
courses in the Human Development and Family Studies program from the National Council on Family Relations for the Certified 
Family Life Educator. The meaning of these accreditations and recognitions is described more fully below in “Regulatory 
Environment—Accreditation.”

Student Recruitment and Marketing

APUS’s marketing strategy traditionally focused on building long-term, mutually beneficial relationships with organizations and 
individuals in military and public safety communities. The core of APUS’s referral strategy is rooted in our military and public safety 
outreach teams, which serve those primary communities and develop lasting partnerships. We believe APUS’s reputation as a trusted 
educator yields peer-to-peer referrals, and positions APUS as a respected institution among top federal and private sector employers. 
These relationships, as well as APUS’s student and alumni networks, also create personal referrals. This relationship-based 
marketing approach enables APUS to achieve student acquisition costs that we believe are less than the industry average.

27

FORM 10-KIn recent years, APUS supplemented relationship-based marketing with traditional media advertising and multifaceted interac-
tive marketing campaigns to create greater brand awareness, particularly for the APU brand outside the military and public 
safety communities, and to increase inquiries from potential students. In these campaigns, APUS utilized digital marketing 
channels such as organic search, pay-per-click, banner advertising, and online social media, among others. This aspect of APUS’s 
marketing strategy along with increased competition and more investment in marketing the less well known APU brand has 
resulted in increased student acquisition costs, and also has attracted students who generally did not perform as well as those 
who enrolled through relationship-based marketing. In the fourth quarter of 2014, APUS revised this strategy to use a more 
targeted and narrower geographical approach that was intended to attract students with greater college readiness.

International Student Recruitment Initiatives

APUS has marketed its programs to a limited number of international students in the past, but now intends to actively market 
its programs in international markets which could subject APUS to a variety of challenges not previously encountered. APUS 
intends to market its programs using foreign representatives and there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful. We 
do not have previous experience marketing APUS’s programs through foreign representatives and we may be unable to ade-
quately manage risks associated with these planned international efforts, including associated regulatory hurdles, which could 
adversely affect our ability to successfully attract, retain and serve students in international markets while negatively impacting 
our profitability and financial condition.

Student Admissions

APUS welcomes prospective students to apply for admission at any time through an online application process. The current 
qualifications for most undergraduate programs are a high school diploma or General Education Development certificate. 
Applicants for graduate programs must hold a baccalaureate degree from an accredited U.S. institution or an equivalent foreign 
institution. Certain programs may have additional admissions standards and restrictions. Following admission students are 
issued a student ID number and password, and are provided information on how to finalize their admission and apply for 
evaluation of transfer credits. Students are also provided information on how to register for courses, arrange for payment, and 
navigate the online student environment. As APUS continues to improve the learning experience and attract students who are 
more likely to persist in its programs, APUS intends to implement a number of important changes and initiatives to admit more 
college-ready students. Beginning in the second quarter of 2015, APUS plans to require that prospective students complete a 
free, non-credit admission course if they are not active duty military or veteran applicants, graduates from certified federal, 
state and local law enforcement and public safety academies, or prospective students with at least nine hours of transfer credit 
with a grade of “C” or better for each course from an accredited institution. These increased admissions standards may have an 
adverse effect on APUS’s enrollment and our financial condition. For additional information on the risks associated with such 
initiatives please refer to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

Cost of Attendance and Financial Aid

We believe that APUS’s ability to offer affordable programs is one of its competitive strengths. Many APUS students also transfer 
a significant number of previously earned academic credit hours, which reduces the cost and time of earning their degrees.

Undergraduate tuition at APUS is $250 per credit hour, or $750 per three-credit course. A full 121-credit hour undergraduate 
degree may be earned for $30,250 in tuition costs at current tuition rates. APUS’s graduate tuition is $325 per credit hour, or 
$975 per three-credit hour course, which means many APUS graduate degrees may be earned for less than $12,000 in tuition at 
current tuition rates. The combined tuition, fees and books at APUS are designed to be less expensive for undergraduate and 
graduate students than the average in-state cost at a public university.

28

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Eligible undergraduate students enrolled in courses for academic credit receive their textbooks and other course materials at no 
additional cost to them through a book grant program. This book grant represents an average potential savings over the course 
of a student’s undergraduate degree program of approximately $4,900 as compared to public four-year colleges and universities 
according to comparative information from The College Board’s Trends in College Pricing 2014 report. APUS also utilizes open 
access and online library materials where applicable and works with various publishers to reduce the cost of textbooks and 
course materials. In addition, APUS also works with a bookstore partner to lower the cost of textbooks and course materials  
for graduate students.

APUS does not charge an admission fee or fees for services such as registration, course drops, and similar events that trigger 
fees at many other institutions. Because APUS is an exclusively online institution, there are no required resident fees, such as 
for parking, food service, student union, and recreation. All students other than active duty members of the military who wish 
to have their transfer credits evaluated are required to pay a one-time flat fee. APUS also charges a technology fee, but 
provides a grant to cover the technology fee for students using DoD tuition assistance programs or VA education benefits. 
When applicable, APUS students are charged withdrawal, graduation, late registration, transcript request and comprehensive 
examination fees.

Except for members of the Coast Guard, DoD tuition assistance programs cover $750 of the tuition costs per course for military 
students, and these students may also be able to use VA education benefits or federal financial aid to cover any remaining cost, 
as described more fully below in “Sources of Student Financing” and “Regulatory Environment—Student Financing Sources and 
Related Regulations/Requirements.” APUS has currently set undergraduate per-course tuition so that the DoD tuition assistance 
program covers the full tuition cost of undergraduate courses for members of the military up to the annual maximum benefit, 
other than for members of the Coast Guard, who are subject to the Coast Guard’s policy of paying only 75% of tuition costs, up 
to $187.50 per semester hour.

APUS has not increased its undergraduate per semester hour tuition rate since the year 2000. However, APUS is planning a 
tuition increase in the second half of 2015, including to support further improvements in the online learning experience and 
other initiatives aimed at improving student success. The tuition increase for graduate and undergraduate tuition is anticipated 
to be in the range of 5% to 8%. To support its active duty military students, APUS will continue providing a tuition grant that will 
keep the cost of tuition for those students at approximately its current level. In 2016, we also expect to evaluate repositioning 
select degree programs by implementing differentiated pricing, primarily to better align tuition of certain programs with higher 
market demand. APUS expects to continue to focus on offering affordable programs.

Sources of Student Financing

APUS’s students finance their education through a combination of individual resources, DoD tuition assistance programs, VA 
education benefits, ED’s Title IV programs, private loans, state and federal grants, and corporate reimbursement programs. Most 
of APUS’s students rely on some form of financial aid in addition to their individual resources. The largest source (by dollar value) 
of financial aid used by APUS students is ED’s Title IV programs. Students utilizing ED’s Title IV programs accounted for 36% of 
APUS’s net course registrations in 2014, and we believe that the ability of our students to participate in these programs is 
essential to APUS’s growth. Participation in the DoD tuition assistance programs, VA education benefits and Title IV programs 
add to APUS’s regulatory burden, as described more fully below in “Regulatory Environment—Student Financing Sources and 
Related Regulations/Requirements.” Participation in these programs means that changes to or interruptions in federal appropri-
ations for these programs or other actions by the federal government will impact APUS’s operations and our financial condition.

As described more fully below in “Regulatory Environment—Recent Legislative and Regulatory Activity—Federal Legislative 
Activity—Sequestration and Budgetary Matters,” in March 2013, in response to automatic across-the-board reductions in 
federal spending (also known as “sequestration”), each of the military services suspended new enrollments in DoD’s tuition 

29

FORM 10-Kassistance programs. As a result of Congressional action, each of the services reinstated enrollments in DoD tuition assistance 
programs in April 2013. However, our results of operations in the second quarter of 2013 were negatively impacted by these 
actions, resulting in what we believe were fewer enrollments from service members than otherwise would have been expected.

In October 2013, DoD tuition assistance programs were temporarily suspended as a result of the partial U.S. government 
shutdown. On October 1, 2013, prior to the government shutdown, APUS’s course registrations for October 2013 were approxi-
mately 41,200. However, as of October 14, 2013, approximately 13,100 registrations had been dropped, resulting in a net course 
registration reduction of approximately 20% compared to October 2012. We believe that many of these dropped registrations 
resulted from the suspension of DoD tuition assistance programs. After the government shutdown ended, DoD resumed its 
tuition assistance programs; however, we do not believe that APUS’s registrations for subsequent periods replaced all of the 
dropped registrations.

As a result of continued uncertainty about the availability of funding, several of the military branches announced changes to 
their tuition assistance programs that took effect in federal fiscal year 2014. For example, the Air Force is no longer authorizing 
tuition assistance for associates degrees if the service member already has an associates degree from the Community College 
of the Air Force, the Army now requires service members to complete one year of service after graduation from Advanced 
Individual Training in order to be eligible for tuition assistance, the Army has reduced the total annual benefit per service 
member from $4,500 to $4,000, and, as mentioned above, the Coast Guard has reduced the benefit payable to 75% of tuition 
costs, not to exceed $187.50 per semester hour. For additional information regarding the risks associated with DoD tuition 
assistance programs, please refer to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

While DoD’s tuition assistance programs were reinstated, subject to the modifications described above, budgetary pressures 
remain, and we do not know what future action will be taken with respect to DoD tuition assistance programs, which could 
include eliminating those programs, reducing the funds or benefits (or both) available under those programs, or enacting new 
restrictions on participation in those programs. Any such changes, or any other reduction in the funding for DoD tuition assis-
tance programs, could have a material adverse effect on APUS’s enrollments and our financial condition. The potential risks 
associated with these and similar events are described more fully below in “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

Faculty and Staff

APUS’s faculty consists of approximately 2,240 faculty members with relevant teaching and practitioner experience as well as  
a professional staff of approximately 1,030 non-faculty employees administering APUS’s academic, technology, service, and 
business operations. Most of APUS’s non-faculty employees work at either its headquarters in Charles Town, West Virginia, or 
at its administrative offices in Manassas, Virginia. None of APUS’s employees are parties to any collective bargaining arrange-
ment. We believe that APUS has a good relationship with its employees.

Approximately 420 faculty members were designated as full-time faculty with the remainder designated as part-time. APUS 
establishes full-time and part-time positions based on program and course enrollment. Many of APUS’s full-time faculty began 
their careers with APUS as part-time faculty. We expect that APUS’s faculty headcount and the composition of full-time and 
part-time faculty will vary as APUS’s enrollment fluctuates.

We believe that APUS’s well-regarded faculty, which includes many former and current practitioners in their fields, attracts 
new students to APUS. A significant majority of APUS’s graduate faculty hold a doctorate in the relevant field, while virtually 
all undergraduate faculty have earned a graduate degree. Exceptions have been granted for a limited number of APUS’s 
faculty members who do not meet these degree standards but evidence significant experience and achievement in the field  
of study that they teach. Many APUS faculty members have relevant experience at leading universities and within military  
and government institutions.

30

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.We believe that the quality of APUS’s faculty is critical to its success because the majority of its interaction with its students  
is through its faculty members. APUS regularly reviews the performance of its faculty by, among other things, monitoring the 
amount of online contact that faculty have with students, reviewing student feedback, and evaluating the learning outcomes 
achieved by students. If APUS determines that a faculty member is not performing at an acceptable level it works with the 
faculty member to improve performance, including through assigning the faculty member a mentor. If the faculty member’s 
performance does not improve, APUS will no longer allow that faculty member to teach. APUS does not offer its faculty tenure.

We believe that the composition of APUS’s student body and curriculum are particularly attractive to potential faculty members 
because of the opportunity to teach relevant material to students who can implement classroom lessons at their workplaces. 
APUS recruits faculty members through referrals by current faculty members, advertisements in education and trade association 
journals, and its internet presence. Upon selection for a position, APUS requires each new faculty member to complete an 
orientation and training program that leads to their certification to teach at APUS and assignment to courses.

Information Technology

APUS has invested significant capital and resources into developing proprietary information systems and processes to support 
what we refer to as Partnership At a Distance™, or PAD. PAD is APUS’s patented approach to interacting with APUS’s students. 
PAD includes a dynamic information system that enables APUS to provide each student with individualized support at appropri-
ate times from pre-enrollment through and beyond graduation, including student advising, administrative support, and commu-
nity networking. PAD provides APUS with the flexibility to engage with its students based on their preferences and has allowed 
APUS to scale and improve the quality of its academic programs and student support.

APUS uses Sakai Collaboration and Learning Environment, or “Sakai CLE,” an open-source Learning Management System for its 
online classroom. There are approximately 350 educational institutions around the world reportedly using Sakai CLE to support 
teaching, learning, research, and collaboration. PAD and Sakai are APUS’s two core enterprise systems. APUS has several other 
systems that are used to support financial aid processing, financial management, human resources processes, marketing and 
decision support. APUS has decided to work towards being in a position to transition its financial aid processing system to its 
former third-party vendor. There will be significant costs and risks relating to the new vendor’s implementation. These costs will 
possibly include costs paid directly to the new vendor, costs related to the efforts of our employees and management, costs 
associated with the transition and the training of APUS employees, and costs incurred in terminating APUS’s relationship with 
its existing software vendor. For additional information regarding the risks of this potential transition please refer to “Risk 
Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

The backbone of APUS’s information technology, or IT, infrastructure consists of two data centers: one in Virginia, and one at  
a co-location facility in Texas. APUS’s technology environment is managed internally. Student access to APUS’s systems is 
provided through redundant data carriers in both data centers. We believe that APUS has established a functional and reliable 
technology system that helps support its mission. APUS continues to invest in technology systems and enhancements to 
support its systems and mission. For additional information regarding risks related to our information technology please refer  
to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

Intellectual Property

APUS exercises rights associated with patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, domain names, agreements, and registra-
tions to protect its intellectual property. APUS’s course syllabi are its property, may be used in current and future courses as 
needed to facilitate instruction, and may be modified to meet evolving course or curriculum requirements. Intellectual property of 
APUS’s individual faculty members remains the property of each such faculty member and is reserved specifically for use only by 

31

FORM 10-Kthe faculty member who owns it, unless the faculty member grants permission for use by others. APUS relies on agreements 
under which it obtains rights to use course content developed by faculty members and other third party content experts.

APUS has secured rights to trademarks for various names and terms used in its business, including “American Public University 
System,” “American Military University,” “American Public University” and logos incorporating the foregoing terms and acro-
nyms of those terms, as well as “Ready When You Are.,” “Educating those Who Serve,” “MAP,” “RESPECTED. AFFORDABLE. 
ONLINE.” and the term “Partnership At a Distance.” We believe these trademarks and brand names are important to how 
prospective students identify APUS and are central to a number of its marketing efforts. APUS also owns rights to more than 
200 internet domain names pertaining to APUS, AMU, APU and other unique descriptors. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 
issued APUS a patent for PAD in February 2011. APUS is also pursuing patents on several innovations that we believe enhance 
and support student’s academic achievement and streamline university operations.

Competition

Within the postsecondary education market, APUS competes primarily with not-for-profit public and private two-year and 
four-year colleges as well as other for-profit schools, particularly those that offer online learning programs. APUS also competes 
in specific targeted markets, such as those discussed below.

APUS has focused on serving the military community since its founding as AMU, and the military market continues to be the 
primary market for APUS. Within the military market, there are more than 2,500 institutions that serve military students and 
receive funds through the DoD tuition assistance program. The primary competitors for military students are other institutions 
offering online instruction and colleges and universities offering on-campus instruction located near military installations. Over 
the last several years, a number of APUS’s competitors have expanded their outreach and marketing efforts directed at active 
duty and reserve service members, as well as veterans.

We believe that APUS will continue to see increased competition in the military community from both non-profit and for-profit 
schools. We believe that competition from for-profit schools will continue to increase as those schools seek to attract students 
eligible for DoD tuition assistance programs and VA education benefits, rather than Title IV programs, in an attempt to comply 
with ED’s regulatory requirement known as the 90/10 Rule. This regulatory requirement is described more fully below in 
“Regulatory Environment—Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements.”

Within the market for public safety professionals, such as law-enforcement personnel or other first responders, and non-military 
professionals and other working adults with extended and irregular work schedules, APUS faces broad competition with 
not-for-profit public and private two-year and four-year colleges as well as other for-profit schools, particularly those that offer 
online learning programs.

Hondros College of Nursing

HCON is nationally accredited by the Accrediting Council of Independent Colleges and Schools, or ACICS. HCON’s programs are 
generally designed to prepare individuals for productive careers in the field of nursing. HCON’s students principally receive 
instruction on-campus at one of HCON’s four campuses in Ohio, which are located in the suburban areas of Cincinnati, Columbus, 
Dayton and Cleveland. HCON also offers certain courses and a program via online delivery. As discussed more fully below in 
“Regulatory Environment—Regulatory Actions and Restrictions on Operations—Change of Ownership Resulting in a Change of 
Control,” HCON participates in ED’s Title IV programs pursuant to a Temporary Provisional Program Participation Agreement.

32

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Curriculum and Scheduling

HCON offers on-campus instruction leading to a Diploma in Practical Nursing, or PN Program, and an Associate Degree in 
Nursing, or ADN program. Graduates of the PN Program are eligible to seek licensure as a licensed practical nurse after passing the 
NCLEX-PN exam. Graduates of the ADN Program are eligible to seek licensure as a registered nurse after passing the NCLEX-RN 
exam. HCON also offers online instruction leading to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, or RN-to-BSN Program, for students who 
already possess an associates degree in the field. HCON’s programs are offered in a quarter format. Academic terms for the PN 
and the ADN programs begin four times each year, with courses starting in January, April, July and October. In an effort to 
better serve students and increase enrollments, in 2014, HCON increased its offering of evening and weekend classes at its 
Columbus and Cleveland campuses.

Enrollment and Student Body

HCON’s student enrollment as of December 31, 2014, was approximately 1,470 students. This number includes those HCON 
students who enrolled in at least one course either on-campus or online during 2014.

Accreditation

HCON is accredited by ACICS, which is recognized by ED as a national accrediting agency. The RN-to-BSN Program has received 
programmatic accreditation from the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education, or CCNE. The status and meaning of these 
accreditations and recognitions is described more fully below in “Regulatory Environment—Accreditation.”

Student Recruitment and Marketing

HCON’s marketing strategy is focused on building long-term relationships with businesses, organizations and individuals in the 
healthcare community, primarily in Ohio. We believe this strategy will continue to generate a significant number of personal 
referrals. In addition, HCON utilizes traditional media as well as internet-focused marketing channels, including organic search, 
local display advertising and pay-per-click.

Student Admissions

HCON welcomes prospective students to apply for admission at any time by submitting an application along with an application 
fee. To be accepted into any HCON program, an applicant must be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident, be at least 18 years old 
at the time of starting the program, and hold a high school diploma or General Education Development certificate. HCON’s 
programs also have program-specific admissions requirements.

Applicants for both the PN Program and the ADN Program are required to complete an interview with an admissions representa-
tive and complete and pass a criminal background check and a drug screening. Applicants for the PN Program are also generally 
required to take and pass the Health Education Systems Admissions Assessment, or HESI Exam.

Applicants for the ADN program who graduated from the PN Program must have graduated from that program within two 
quarters of their enrollment in the ADN program, or must hold an active, unencumbered practical nurse license. Applicants for 
the ADN program who have not graduated from the PN Program must have completed their practical nursing training at an 
approved program, and must hold an active, unencumbered practical nurse license.

Applicants for the RN-to-BSN Program must hold an active, unencumbered registered nurse license in the state in which they 
desire to complete their practicum. Applicants must also have graduated from an approved registered nursing program with a 
cumulative grade point average of at least 2.0, and must complete an interview with an admissions representative. Applicants 
applying to begin the RN-to-BSN Program in the quarter immediately following graduation from the ADN Program may be 
admitted without a license, but are required to obtain one prior to their third quarter in the RN-to-BSN Program.

33

FORM 10-KCost of Attendance and Financial Aid

HCON’s tuition costs vary among its three programs. HCON’s PN Program may be completed for approximately $19,065 in tuition 
and fees, the ADN program may be completed for approximately $30,175 in tuition and fees, and the RN-to-BSN Program may 
be completed for approximately $16,790 in tuition and fees.

HCON’s students also incur costs for textbooks and supplies. These costs vary among HCON’s three programs and are paid for 
by HCON’s students as the textbooks or supplies are needed. HCON estimates that over the life of its programs a student’s 
costs related to textbooks and supplies will be approximately $2,894 for the PN Program, $4,012 for the ADN Program, and 
$1,600 for the RN-to-BSN Program.

HCON’s students pay various other fees and charges, including application fees and graduation fees. Additionally, students in 
HCON’s PN program and ADN program are charged a one-time fee of $698 for its technology package. HCON’s students also 
incur additional costs for uniforms, examination review materials, examination fees, and fees for applications with the Ohio 
Board of Nursing, among others. Some of these costs are payable to HCON and others are payable directly to third parties.

Sources of Student Financing

HCON’s students finance their education through a combination of individual resources, VA education benefits, ED’s Title IV 
programs, private loans, state and federal grants, and corporate reimbursement programs. Most HCON students rely on some 
form of financial aid in addition to their individual resources. The substantial majority of HCON’s revenues are derived from 
students utilizing ED’s Title IV programs, which, as discussed more fully below in “Regulatory Environment—Student Financing 
Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements—Department of Education—Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs—
The ‘90/10 Rule,’” results in increased regulatory risks. As a result, HCON’s management may find it necessary to decrease 
HCON’s exposure to Title IV students, which could have a negative impact on its operating results and our financial condition.

While HCON does not currently participate in DoD’s tuition assistance programs it may attempt to do so in the future. Should 
HCON choose to participate in the DoD tuition assistance program, it will be subject to such program’s requirements and 
restrictions, which are more fully discussed in the “Our Institutions—American Public University System—Sources of Student 
Financing,” “Regulatory Environment—Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements,” “Regulatory 
Environment—Recent Legislative and Regulatory Activity—Federal Legislative Activity—Sequestration and Budgetary 
Matters,” and “Risk Factors” sections of this Annual Report.

Faculty and Staff

HCON’s faculty consists of approximately 150 faculty members with relevant teaching and nursing or healthcare practitioner 
experience. HCON also employs approximately 80 staff members who administer HCON’s academic, technology, service, and 
business operations. HCON’s faculty and staff largely work at one of its four campuses. None of HCON’s employees are parties 
to any collective bargaining arrangement. We believe that HCON has a good relationship with its employees.

Approximately 100 of HCON’s faculty members are designated as full-time faculty with the remainder being designated as 
part-time faculty. All faculty whose instruction is focused within the PN Program must have earned the minimum of a bachelor’s 
degree in nursing. All faculty whose instruction is focused within the ADN Program and RN-BSN Program must have earned the 
minimum of a master’s degree. All HCON faculty whose instruction is nursing theory based must have an active license to 
practice as a Registered Nurse. In addition to the formal education of HCON’s faculty, many have also obtained specialized 
certifications in the field of nursing.

34

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.We believe that selecting well-educated and qualified faculty members is a key component to HCON’s success. In addition to 
having the necessary educational requirements, HCON seeks faculty who have demonstrated experience in the field of nursing. 
Almost all faculty who teach HCON’s nursing courses have nursing experience in a clinical setting, which we believe helps teach 
HCON’s students the skills needed to be effective and safe caregivers.

HCON trains and develops new faculty through a formal, structured on-boarding, training, and mentoring program. All new 
HCON faculty members receive a 90-day on-boarding experience, which includes a formal orientation to the organization, 
policies and procedures, teaching strategies, performance expectations and role responsibilities.

Information Technology

HCON’s IT infrastructure is largely hosted and maintained by a third-party affiliated with HCON’s previous ownership. We are 
currently evaluating consolidating HCON’s IT infrastructure with APUS’s.

In January 2015, HCON’s accounting system was transitioned to the Company’s accounting system and its online academic 
programs and courses were transitioned to the Sakai CLE hosted by APUS. For information regarding the security and reliability 
of APUS-provided systems please refer to “Our Institutions—American Public University System—Information Technology.” 
HCON has several other systems that are used to support financial management, human resources processes, marketing and 
decision support, which are not provided by APUS.

Intellectual Property

In connection with our acquisition of HCON, we received the right to the corporate name National Education Seminars, Inc. and 
a royalty-free, irrevocable, exclusive, transferable, sublicensable license to use the names “Hondros College” and “Hondros 
College of Nursing” (or, instead of “Nursing,” any other qualifier directly related to nursing, medicine or healthcare in connection 
with the business and operations of HCON).

HCON exercises rights associated with copyrights, trademarks, service marks, domain names, agreements, and registrations to 
protect its intellectual property.

Competition

HCON competes with other schools offering nursing programs in the regions where it has campuses, including for-profit and 
not-for-profit public and private colleges. Because HCON’s RN-to-BSN Program is offered online, it also competes in a broader 
market against other online nursing programs.

Regulatory Environment
In the United States, postsecondary education institutions are overseen by a three-part regulatory framework comprised of  
(1) accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education, (2) state regulatory bodies, and (3) the federal govern-
ment, through the U.S. Department of Education, or ED. Because APUS participates in military tuition assistance and APUS 
and HCON participate in veterans education benefits programs administered by the U.S. Department of Defense, or DoD, and 
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, or VA, respectively, we are also subject to oversight by those agencies. The regulations, 
standards, and policies of these organizations cover the vast majority of our operations, including our educational programs, 
facilities, instructional and administrative staff, administrative procedures, marketing, recruiting, financial operations, and 
financial condition.

The post secondary education regulatory environment continues to become more complex. Applicable regulations, standards, 
and policies frequently change, and changes in, or new interpretations of existing regulations, standards, and policies, as well as 

35

FORM 10-Kapplicable laws, could have material consequences for our accreditation, authorization to operate in various states, permissible 
activities, receipt of funds under federal student financial aid programs, and costs of doing business. In recent years ED has 
been actively issuing new rules which have had a substantial impact on the proprietary postsecondary education industry. For 
example, in 2010, ED adopted a new set of rules, which we refer to as the Program Integrity Regulations, which were generally 
effective on July 1, 2011, establishing significant new compliance requirements for institutions of higher education. Certain 
portions of the Program Integrity Regulations are discussed in this Annual Report.

Accreditation

Accreditation is a voluntary, non-governmental process through which an institution or a program submits to qualitative review 
by an organization of peer institutions, based on the standards of the accrediting agency and the stated aims and purposes of 
the institution or program. Accrediting agencies establish criteria for accreditation, conduct peer-review evaluations of institu-
tions or programs, and publicly recognize those institutions or programs that meet the stated criteria. Accredited schools and 
programs are subject to periodic review by accrediting agencies to ensure continued high performance, institutional and 
program improvement, and institutional and program integrity, and to confirm that accreditation criteria continue to be satisfied. 
An institution or program that is determined not to meet the criteria may have its accreditation limited, revoked, or not renewed.

Pursuant to provisions of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or the HEA, ED relies on accrediting agencies to 
determine whether the academic quality of an institution’s educational programs is sufficient to qualify the institution to 
participate in student financial aid programs authorized under Title IV of the HEA, or Title IV programs. Institutional accredita-
tion by an accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary of Education is also necessary to participate in DoD tuition assistance 
programs. To be recognized by the Secretary of Education, accrediting agencies must adopt specific standards and procedures 
for the review of educational institutions or programs. As described more fully above in each reporting segment’s “Regulatory 
Environment—Accreditation” section, each of our institutions is accredited by an institutional accrediting agency recognized by 
the Secretary of Education:

•  American Public University System, or APUS, is institutionally accredited by The Higher Learning Commission, or HLC,  
a regional accrediting agency. In July 2011, HLC reaffirmed the accreditation status of APUS. The next comprehensive 
evaluation is scheduled for the 2020-2021 academic year, with an interim progress report on the development of a 
university system-wide coordination and improvement of graduate studies due in July 2015.

HLC conducted a site visit in January 2015 to review several new proposed programs. HLC also from time to time may 
schedule site visits for other reasons, including a comprehensive evaluation in year four or year ten of an accreditation cycle; 
or a focused visit related to a change of control, structure or organization transaction, a substantive change, or conformity 
with HLC’s Criteria for Accreditation (related to topics such as teaching and learning, and resources).

•  Hondros College of Nursing, or HCON, is institutionally accredited by the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges  
and Schools, or ACICS, a national accrediting agency. On August 13, 2013, ACICS acted to award HCON a new grant of 
accreditation through December 31, 2016. After completion of our acquisition of HCON, ACICS acted to reinstate HCON’s 
accreditation through December 31, 2016, effective from the date of the acquisition. ACICS conducted on-site quality 
assurance visits in the summer of 2014 and found HCON to be in compliance with all accreditation criteria. For more 
information, see “Regulatory Environment—Regulatory Actions and Restrictions on Operations—Change in Ownership 
Resulting in a Change of Control.”

Institutional accreditation is an important attribute of our institutions. Colleges and universities depend, in part, on accreditation 
in evaluating transfers of credit and applications to graduate schools. Employers rely on the accredited status of institutions 
when evaluating a candidate’s credentials, and students, corporations, and government sponsors under tuition reimbursement 
programs look to accreditation for assurance that an institution maintains quality educational standards.

36

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.The National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, or NACIQI, is charged with advising the Secretary of 
Education on whether to recognize accrediting agencies for federal purposes, including for participation in Title IV programs. In 
December 2009, the ED Office of the Inspector General, or OIG, recommended that ED consider limiting, suspending, or terminat-
ing HLC’s recognition as an accreditor for purposes of determining institutional eligibility to participate in Title IV programs. HLC 
received additional scrutiny in June 2010 during a House Education and Labor Committee hearing focused on OIG’s findings with 
regard to credit hour policies. Increased scrutiny of accrediting agencies by the Secretary of Education and Congress in connec-
tion with ED’s recognition process may result in increased scrutiny of institutions by accrediting agencies.

In December 2010, NACIQI reviewed HLC’s status as a recognized accrediting agency. At that time, NACIQI voted to continue 
HLC’s recognition as an accrediting agency but also ordered the agency to submit an additional compliance report in one year.  
At its December 2011 meeting, NACIQI characterized HLC’s report as “informational” and noted that no vote was to be taken  
on it. In June 2013, NACIQI voted to recommend continuation of HLC’s recognition as an accrediting agency until it reaches a 
final decision on whether to re-recognize HLC. Before NACIQI reaches a final decision on HLC’s petition for renewal of recogni-
tion, HLC must demonstrate that it has implemented its new standards and policies that were effective January 2013, and must 
submit to NACIQI a compliance report to that effect. Although NACIQI was scheduled to review HLC for recognition purposes in 
the spring of 2014, the status of HLC’s recognition as an accrediting body was not on the June 2014 or December 2014 NACIQI 
meeting agendas. If HLC were to lose its recognition as an accrediting agency, APUS could lose its eligibility to participate in 
Title IV programs. For additional information regarding the risks associated with accreditation please refer to the “Risk 
Factors—Risks Related to the Regulation of Our Industry” section of this Annual Report.

In addition to institutional accreditation, we have obtained specialized accreditation or professional recognition for several 
specific programs at our institutions, as described more fully above in each reporting segment’s section entitled “Regulatory 
Environment—Accreditation.” Accreditation of a program by a specialized accrediting agency or granting of professional 
recognition by a professional organization signifies that the program meets the standards of that agency or organization. If  
we fail to satisfy the standards of these specialized accrediting agencies and professional organizations, we could lose the 
specialized accreditation or professional recognition for the relevant programs, which could result in materially reduced 
student enrollments in those programs, could prevent us from offering the programs in certain states, or could prevent our 
students from seeking and obtaining appropriate licensure in their desired fields or employment from particular employers.

State Licensure/Authorization

We are subject to extensive regulations by the states in which we are authorized to operate. The level of regulatory oversight 
varies substantially from state to state, and state regulations change frequently. State laws typically establish standards for 
instruction, qualifications of faculty, administrative procedures, marketing, recruiting, financial operations, and other operational 
matters. Some states may also prescribe regulations related to an institution’s financial condition, and some states require the 
posting of surety bonds. State laws and regulations may also affect our ability to offer educational programs, open locations, 
and award degrees. If we fail to comply with a state’s regulatory requirements, we may lose our state licensure or authorization, 
which would result in our inability to enroll students in that state, and could result in our inability to receive Title IV program 
funds and DoD tuition assistance funds, at least for students in that state.

Some states assert authority to regulate an institution if its educational programs are offered to residents of those states, 
regardless of whether the institution maintains a physical presence in the state where the student resides. The increased 
popularity of online education has led and may further lead to the adoption of new laws and regulatory practices and new 
interpretations of existing laws and regulations in various states. States may also revise their regulations in this area as a result 
of future ED regulations, as discussed more fully below in “State Licensure/Authorization Requirements.” New laws, regula-
tions, or interpretations related to doing business over the internet could increase our cost of doing business and affect our 
ability to recruit students in particular states, which could, in turn, negatively affect enrollments and revenues and have a 

37

FORM 10-Kmaterial adverse effect on our business. For additional information regarding the risks related to the regulation of the internet 
please refer to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

Changes in our business or changes in the nature or amount of our contact with or presence within a particular state could lead 
states that do not currently require us to be licensed or authorized to require such licensure or authorization in the future. For 
example, programs that include “on the ground” components that may be described as instructional activities, such as student 
teaching and clinical internships, may be viewed by some state regulatory agencies as constituting a physical presence for 
regulatory purposes. As those programs expand, there is a high probability that we will need to seek formal authorization to 
operate in some states where historically we have not been required to do so. The extent of this expansion in regulatory require-
ments, and the associated costs, are not known at this time, but we anticipate they may be significant. Furthermore, there may be 
some states where it takes a significant amount of time to meet the applicable regulatory requirements with respect to a new 
program initiative, or where we are not able to do so at all.

Many states also have specific requirements that an individual must satisfy in order to be licensed as a professional in a 
specified field. Students often seek to obtain professional licensure in their chosen fields after graduation. Their success in 
obtaining licensure typically depends on several factors, including, for example: the individual merits of the graduate; whether 
the institution and the program were approved by the state in which the graduate seeks licensure, or by a professional associa-
tion; whether the program meets all state requirements for professional licensure; and whether the institution or the specific 
program is accredited.

State Licensure/Authorization Requirements

“Home” State Authorization. The final Program Integrity Regulations adopted by ED address certain institutional and 
program eligibility issues, including state authorization. The Program Integrity Regulations specify how an institution may 
demonstrate that it is authorized to offer postsecondary educational programs by the state(s) where it is located, which we 
refer to as its “home” state. If requested by ED, an institution must be able to document its home state’s approval in order to 
participate in Title IV programs. In addition, the home state must have a process to review and take appropriate action on 
complaints concerning postsecondary institutions. ED has stated that it will not publish a list of states that meet, or fail to 
meet, these requirements. If ED determines that an institution does not have the required state approval, the institution will 
be ineligible to participate in Title IV programs. For institutions whose state authorization does not satisfy ED’s requirements, 
ED has delayed the implementation date twice provided certain conditions are met, such as the state is establishing an 
acceptable authorization process and the institution obtains an explanation from the state that supports application of the 
extension. The most recent such extension was announced in June 2014, and the delayed implementation date is July 1, 2015. 
We cannot predict the extent to which ED will determine that the institutional authorization or complaint review process of 
any state satisfies ED’s regulations. If one of our institutions were to lose its ability to participate in Title IV programs because 
it failed to obtain authorization by the state in which it is located or because a state’s institutional authorization and complaint 
process did not satisfy ED’s requirements, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results 
of operations, and cash flows.

State Authorization of Online Education. In November 2013, ED announced its intent to establish a negotiated rulemaking 
panel to consider regulations for, among other issues, state authorization of programs offered through distance education. 
Negotiated rulemaking sessions occurred in the winter and spring of 2014, but the negotiating committee did not reach consen-
sus. In June 2014 ED announced that it would delay the release of proposed rules regarding state authorization for distance 
education. ED had included provisions regarding state authorization for distance education in the Program Integrity Regulations, 
which provided that, if an institution offered postsecondary education through distance education to students in a state, it was 
required to obtain any necessary state approvals to do so. However, on July 12, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of 

38

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Columbia upheld ED’s power to promulgate regulations on state authorization for distance education but vacated on procedural 
grounds those provisions of the Program Integrity Regulations, and on June 5, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District  
of Columbia affirmed the district court’s ruling. In a Dear Colleague Letter dated July 27, 2012, ED warned that while it cannot 
enforce the vacated provision, institutions continue to be responsible for complying with all state laws as they relate to 
distance education. ED has stated publicly that it intends to issue a proposed rule in the coming months. No assurance can be 
given with respect to whether ED will adopt new rules on state authorization for distance education or, in the event that such 
regulations are adopted, our ability to comply with the new regulations.

SARA

The State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement, or SARA, is a voluntary agreement among member states, districts and 
territories that establishes comparable national standards for interstate offering of postsecondary distance education courses 
and programs. SARA is intended to make it easier for students to take online courses offered by postsecondary institutions 
based in another state. SARA is overseen by a National Council and administered by four regional education compacts, which 
accept applications from states in their regions to join SARA. SARA requires states to approve institutions in their state to 
participate in SARA, based upon institutional accreditation and financial stability, and to resolve student complaints. SARA 
membership is open to degree-granting postsecondary institutions from all sectors, including public colleges and universities as 
well as non-profit and for-profit independent institutions. An institution must be accredited by an agency recognized by the U.S. 
Secretary of Education. SARA member states agree to impose no additional (non-SARA) authorization requirements on institu-
tions from other SARA states. For SARA purposes, an institution’s “home state” is the state where its main campus or central 
unit holds its principal legal domicile. SARA shifts principal oversight responsibilities from the state in which the distance 
education is being received to the “home state” of the institution offering the instruction. Membership in SARA was opened to 
states in January 2014. The State of West Virginia joined SARA effective December 1, 2014, and APUS’s application to become 
a SARA institution was approved on December 8, 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the State of Ohio had not joined SARA and as 
a result HCON was not eligible for membership.

State Authorization/Licensure of Our Institutions

APUS is physically headquartered in the State of West Virginia, with administrative offices in the Commonwealth of Virginia.  
At present, APUS enrolls students from each of the 50 states, as well as the District of Columbia. APUS is currently authorized 
to offer its programs by the West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission, or WVHEPC, the regulatory agency governing 
postsecondary education in the State of West Virginia. We believe that under current law the only state authorization or 
licensure necessary for APUS to participate in DoD tuition assistance programs is its authorization from WVHEPC. We believe 
the same is true for Title IV programs. Failure to comply with the requirements of WVHEPC could result in APUS losing its 
authorization from WVHEPC, its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, or its ability to offer certain programs, any of which 
could force APUS to cease operations.

Due to APUS having administrative offices located in Virginia, under Virginia law APUS is also required to be authorized by the 
State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, or SCHEV. Accordingly, APUS has obtained SCHEV’s authorization to operate as 
an out-of-state institution in Virginia.

On December 8, 2014, APUS was approved as a participating institution in the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement, or 
SARA, which is described more fully above, resulting in APUS being authorized through reciprocity in 17 SARA states. Virginia is 
a SARA state but, as discussed above, APUS is required to be authorized in Virginia due to having administrative offices located 
within the Commonwealth; therefore, SCHEV’s regulation of APUS is outside the scope of SARA. Additionally, APUS has 
obtained licensure or authorization to operate or conduct activities in 14 states that have not joined SARA. APUS has sought 

39

FORM 10-Kand received confirmation that its operations do not require state licensure or authorization, or has been notified that it is 
exempt from licensure or authorization requirements, in 18 states.

HCON is physically headquartered in Westerville, Ohio, with four campuses in Ohio. HCON is currently authorized to offer its 
programs by the Ohio State Board of Career Colleges and Schools, the regulatory agency that is responsible for authorizing 
for-profit and non-profit private career schools offering associate degree, certificate, and diploma programs in the State of Ohio. 
HCON’s Practical Nursing Diploma and Associate Degree in Nursing programs are approved by the Ohio Board of Nursing. 
HCON’s online completion program leading to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing is approved by the Ohio Board of Regents, the 
regulatory agency in Ohio responsible for authorizing education programs at the bachelor’s degree level and above. HCON 
currently enrolls students in 14 states. HCON is approved as an out-of-state institution by the Indiana Board of Proprietary 
Education, the Kentucky Council on Post-Secondary Education, and the Nevada Commission on Post-Secondary Education.

Failure to comply with state authorization or licensure requirements could restrict our institutions’ ability to recruit or enroll 
students in certain states or result in other sanctions being imposed on our institutions, including fines and penalties. In some 
cases, state authorization or licensure may impose limitations on certain activities and may impose particular requirements with 
respect to certain programs. We review the licensure requirements of states to determine whether our institutions’ activities in 
those states may constitute a presence or otherwise may require authorization or licensure by the respective state education 
agencies. We cannot predict the extent to which SARA will impact our institutions’ regulatory burden and costs, whether states 
will join and retain membership in SARA, the manner in which SARA’s rules will be interpreted and enforced by SARA’s member 
states, our institutions’ ability to comply with SARA’s requirements and retain membership eligibility, or the impact that failure 
to meet the SARA requirements may have on our business. To date, state-specific limitations and requirements have not had a 
material effect on our institutions’ operations. However, new laws, regulations, interpretations, or changed circumstances related 
to our institutions’ educational programs could increase our cost of doing business and affect our ability to recruit students and 
offer programs in particular states, which could, in turn, adversely affect our institutions’ enrollments and revenues and have a 
material effect on our business.

Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements

Our students finance their education through a combination of Title IV programs administered by ED, tuition assistance programs 
administered by the DoD, education benefits administered by the VA, private loans, corporate reimbursement programs, and 
individual resources. Participation in federal student aid programs, including those administered by DoD and VA, adds to the 
regulation of our operations. In particular, the HEA and the regulations issued thereunder by ED subject us to significant 
regulatory scrutiny in the form of numerous standards we must satisfy in order to participate in and administer the federal 
student financial aid programs under Title IV.

Department of Education

The federal government provides a substantial part of its support for postsecondary education through HEA Title IV programs,  
in the form of grants and loans to eligible students who can use those funds at any institution that has been certified by ED to 
participate in Title IV programs, provided the student’s program satisfies Title IV program eligibility requirements. An institution 
may participate in Title IV programs only if it is certified to do so and it enters into a written program participation agreement, 
or PPA, with the Secretary of Education. The PPA conditions initial and continued participation in Title IV programs upon 
compliance with ED regulations, including regulations applicable to individual Title IV programs, and any additional conditions 
specified in the PPA.

Types of Title IV Financial Aid Programs. Title IV program aid is primarily awarded to students on the basis of financial 
need, generally defined as the difference between the cost of attending an institution and the amount a student can reasonably 

40

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.contribute to that cost. All recipients of Title IV program funds must maintain satisfactory academic progress and must progress 
in a timely manner toward completion of their program of study. In addition, each school must ensure that Title IV program funds 
are properly accounted for and disbursed in the correct amounts and in a timely manner to eligible students.

Students at our institutions receive grants and loans to fund their education under several Title IV programs, of which the two 
largest are Direct Loans and Pell Grants. Students at our institutions are eligible to participate in the following Title IV programs:

(1)  Federal Student and Parent Loans. ED’s most significant form of aid includes loans to students and their parents through 
the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, or Direct Loan Program. Direct Loan Program loans are made directly by the 
federal government to students or their parents. The Direct Loan Program offers Federal Stafford Loans, Federal Parent PLUS 
Loans, Federal Grad PLUS Loans and Federal Consolidation Loans. Prior to July 1, 2010, students could obtain loans made 
under the Federal Family Education Loan Program, or FFEL Program, in addition to or instead of Direct Loan Program loans, 
depending on the federal loan program in which their school participated. The FFEL Program was eliminated through legisla-
tion enacted in March 2010, and, after June 30, 2010, Federal Stafford Loans, Federal Parent PLUS Loans, and Federal Grad 
PLUS Loans, and Federal Consolidation Loans may only be made through the Direct Loan Program.

Federal Stafford Loans, or Stafford Loans, may either be subsidized or unsubsidized. A student with demonstrated financial 
need may be eligible to receive a subsidized Stafford Loan where ED pays the interest on the loan while the student is 
enrolled at least half-time in school and during the first six months after leaving school. A student without demonstrated 
financial need may be eligible to receive an unsubsidized Stafford Loan where the student is responsible for the interest that 
accrued while in school and after leaving school. Students who are eligible for a subsidized Stafford Loan may also be 
eligible to receive an unsubsidized Stafford Loan. Federal Parent PLUS Loans, or Parent PLUS Loans, may be obtained by the 
parents of a dependent undergraduate student in an amount not to exceed the difference between the total cost of that 
student’s education (including allowable expenses) and other aid to which that student is entitled. Students who are 
classified as independent, and dependent students whose parents are unable to obtain Parent PLUS Loans, can receive 
additional unsubsidized Stafford Loans. Federal Grad PLUS Loans, or Grad PLUS Loans, are available to graduate or profes-
sional students enrolled at least half-time. The obligation to begin repaying federal loans does not commence until six 
months after a student ceases enrollment as at least a half-time student. Federal Consolidation Loans allow a student who 
has graduated, left school, or dropped below half-time enrollment to combine multiple federal education loans into one loan 
with one interest rate and one monthly payment.

(2)  Federal Grant Programs. Pell Grants are ED’s primary program for grants to undergraduate students who demonstrate 

financial need. The maximum amount of availability of a Pell Grant is $5,645 for the 2013–2014 award year and is $5,730 for 
the 2014–2015 award year and $5,830 for the 2015–2016 award year. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, or the 
Appropriations Act, amended the HEA to reduce the income threshold for an automatic zero “expected family contribution” 
for both dependent and independent students, which for some students decreased the amount of their Pell Grants. The 
Appropriations Act also amended the HEA to reduce the duration of a student’s lifetime eligibility to receive a Pell Grant 
from 18 semesters (or its equivalent) to 12 semesters (or its equivalent). This may eliminate the ability of some of our 
students to continue to receive Pell Grants, depending on their prior receipt of Pell Grants from our institutions and from 
other institutions prior to enrolling in one of our schools.

The Federal Supplemental Education Opportunity Grant, or FSEOG, program provides grant awards designed to supplement 
Pell Grants for the neediest undergraduate students. The availability of FSEOG awards is limited by the amount of those 
funds allocated by ED to an institution under a formula that takes into account the size of the institution, its costs, and the 
income levels of students.

41

FORM 10-KThe Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grant, or TEACH Grant, program provides up to $4,000 a 
year in grant assistance to undergraduate, post-baccalaureate, and graduate students who agree to serve for at least four 
years as full-time “highly qualified” teachers in high-need fields in public or not-for-profit private elementary or secondary 
schools that serve students from low-income families.

(3)  Federal Work-Study. Under the Federal Work-Study program, ED pays up to 75% of the cost of part-time employment of 
eligible students, based on their financial need, to perform work for the institutions they attend, or for off-campus public or 
non-profit organizations.

In the second half of 2015, we plan to change the method by which we disburse Federal Student Aid from a single disbursement 
method to a multiple disbursement method for first-time APUS undergraduate students. While this change may adversely impact 
enrollment, we are making this change in order to potentially lower bad debt expense and to reduce the attractiveness of our 
programs to students who are seeking to take improper advantage of federal student aid programs. We have no assurance that 
this change will be successful at reducing bad debt.

Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs

To be eligible and certified to participate in Title IV programs, an institution must be accredited by an accrediting body recog-
nized by the Secretary of Education, must be authorized to operate by the appropriate regulatory authority in each state where 
the institution maintains a physical presence, and must comply with specific standards and procedures set forth in the HEA and 
the regulations issued thereunder by ED.

ED periodically revises its regulations and changes its interpretations of existing laws and regulations. Accrediting agencies  
and state education agencies also have responsibilities for overseeing compliance of institutions with Title IV program require-
ments. As a result, our institutions are subject to extensive oversight and review. For all these reasons, we cannot predict with 
certainty how Title IV program requirements will be applied in all circumstances. See “Recent Legislative and Regulatory 
Activity” below for more information. Key provisions relating to institutional participation in Title IV and the processing of 
Title IV aid that could adversely affect us include the following:

Eligibility and Certification Procedures. An institution must apply periodically to ED for continued certification to participate 
in Title IV programs. Recertification generally is required every six years, but may be required earlier, including when an institution 
undergoes a change of control. An institution may come under review when it expands its activities in certain ways, such as 
opening an additional location, adding a new program, or, in certain cases, when it modifies academic credentials that it offers.

ED may place an institution on provisional certification status if ED finds that the institution does not fully satisfy all Title IV 
requirements and in certain other circumstances, such as when an institution is initially certified or undergoes a change in 
ownership resulting in a change in control. During a period of provisional certification, the institution must comply with any 
additional conditions included in its PPA. In addition, ED may more closely review an institution that is provisionally certified  
if it applies for approval to open a new location, add an educational program, acquire another school, or make any other 
significant change. If ED determines that a provisionally certified institution is unable to meet its responsibilities under its PPA, 
it may seek to revoke the institution’s certification to participate in Title IV programs with fewer due process protections for 
the institution than if it were fully certified. Students attending provisionally certified institutions remain eligible to receive 
Title IV program funds.

APUS is fully certified to participate in Title IV programs through September 30, 2020. HCON was deemed to have undergone  
a change of ownership and control in November 2013, requiring review by ED in order to reestablish eligibility and continue 
participation in Title IV programs. As described more fully below in “Regulatory Actions and Restrictions on Operations—Change 

42

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.in Ownership Resulting in a Change of Control,” ED has granted HCON temporary provisional certification on a month-to-month 
basis until ED renders a decision on HCON’s application for approval of a change of ownership. HCON must comply with specific 
conditions while it is provisionally certified, as described more fully in “Restrictions on Adding Locations and Educational 
Programs,” below.

State Authorization. To participate in Title IV programs, a school must receive and maintain authorization by the appropriate 
state education agencies. As described more fully above in “State Licensure/Authorization,” ED has specified the types of state 
approvals that are acceptable to demonstrate that an institution is authorized to offer educational programs beyond the 
secondary level by the state where it is located.

Administrative Capability. Current ED regulations specify extensive criteria by which an institution must establish that it has 
the requisite “administrative capability” to participate in Title IV programs. To meet the administrative capability standards, an 
institution must, among other things:

•  comply with all applicable Title IV program regulations;

•  have capable and sufficient personnel to administer Title IV programs;

•  have acceptable methods of defining and measuring the satisfactory academic progress of its students;

•  not have cohort default rates above specified levels;

•  have various procedures in place for safeguarding federal funds;

•  not be, and not have any principal or affiliate who is, debarred or suspended from federal contracting or engaging in activity 

that is cause for debarment or suspension;

•  provide financial aid counseling to its students;

•  refer to ED’s Office of Inspector General any credible information indicating that any applicant, student, employee or agent of 

the institution has been engaged in any fraud or other illegal conduct involving Title IV programs;

•  submit in a timely manner all reports and financial statements required by the regulations;

•  report annually to the Secretary of Education on any reasonable reimbursements paid or provided by a private education 
lender or group of lenders to any employee who is employed in the institution’s financial aid office, or who otherwise has 
responsibilities with respect to education loans;

•  develop and apply an adequate system to identify and resolve discrepant information with respect to a student’s application 

for Title IV aid; and

•  not otherwise appear to lack administrative capability.

If an institution fails to satisfy any of these criteria, ED may require the repayment of federal student financial aid funds, transfer 
the institution from the “advance” system of payment of Title IV program funds to cash monitoring status or to the “reimburse-
ment” system of payment, place the institution on provisional certification status, or commence a proceeding to impose a fine or 
to limit, suspend, or terminate the participation of the institution in Title IV programs.

Financial Responsibility. The HEA and ED regulations establish extensive standards of financial responsibility that institu-
tions must satisfy in order to participate in Title IV programs. These standards generally require that an institution provide the 
services described in its official publications and statements, properly administer Title IV programs in which it participates, and 
meet all of its financial obligations, including required refunds and any repayments to ED for debts and liabilities incurred in 
programs administered by ED.

43

FORM 10-KED evaluates institutions on an annual basis for compliance with specified financial responsibility standards. The financial 
responsibility standards include a complex formula that uses line items from the institution’s audited financial statements. The 
formula focuses on three financial ratios: (1) equity ratio (which measures the institution’s capital resources, financial viability, and 
ability to borrow); (2) primary reserve ratio (which measures the institution’s viability and liquidity); and (3) net income ratio (which 
measures the institution’s profitability or ability to operate within its means). Generally, an institution’s financial ratios must yield  
a composite score of at least 1.5 for the institution to be deemed financially responsible without the need for further federal 
oversight. Under certain circumstances, an institution may be able to establish financial responsibility on an alternative basis.

ED may also apply the financial responsibility standards to an eligible institution’s parent ownership entities. At the request of 
ED, for purposes of evaluating the financial responsibility of our institutions, including the composite score calculation, we 
supply consolidated financial statements to ED.

Failure of one of our institutions to meet the “financial responsibility” requirements, because it does not meet the minimum 
composite score to establish financial responsibility or is unable to establish financial responsibility on an alternative basis or 
because it fails to meet other financial responsibility requirements, could cause the institution to lose access to Title IV program 
funding, or result in other penalties.

The “90/10 Rule.” A requirement of the HEA, commonly referred to as the “90/10 Rule,” applies only to “proprietary institu-
tions of higher education,” which includes for-profit schools like our institutions. Under this rule, a proprietary institution is 
prohibited from deriving from Title IV programs, on a cash accounting basis (except for certain institutional loans) for any fiscal 
year, more than 90% of its revenues (as computed for 90/10 Rule purposes). If an institution violates the 90/10 Rule for any 
fiscal year, the institution is placed on provisional status for two fiscal years. An institution that violates the rule for two 
consecutive fiscal years becomes ineligible to participate in Title IV programs for at least two fiscal years and is required to 
demonstrate compliance with Title IV eligibility and certification requirements for at least two fiscal years prior to resuming Title 
IV program participation. ED discloses on its website any proprietary institution of higher education that fails to meet the 90/10 
requirement, and reports annually to Congress the relevant ratios for each proprietary institution of higher education.

Using the applicable 90/10 formula, the following table contains the percentage of cash-basis revenues earned from Title IV 
program funds.

APUS
HCON

2011

42%
72%

2012

43%
75%

2013

46%
81%

The percentage of cash-based revenues derived by our institutions from Title IV program funds has increased as the population 
of students using Title IV program funds has increased. The population of our institutions’ students using these funds is growing 
at a faster rate than students who use other sources of revenues, and we continue to monitor compliance with the 90/10 Rule.

The 90/10 Rule has been a subject of interest over the past several Congresses which has resulted in several members of 
Congress introducing proposals and legislation that would modify the 90/10 Rule. One previous Congressional proposal would 
decrease the limit on Title IV funds from 90% to 85% and would have counted DoD tuition assistance (TA) and GI Bill education 
benefits (VA) toward that limit. Further, the President’s 2016 Budget proposes the inclusion of DoD tuition assistance and GI 
education benefits in the 90% portion of the 90/10 calculation. Such proposals, or other similar legislation, should they become 
law, could have a material adverse impact on the operations of APUS and potentially HCON.

44

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Incentive Payment Rule. As part of an institution’s Title IV program participation agreement with ED and in accordance with 
the HEA, an institution may not provide any commission, bonus or other incentive payment to any person or entity engaged in any 
student recruitment, admissions, or financial aid awarding activity based directly or indirectly on success in securing enrollments 
or federal student financial aid. Failure to comply with the incentive payment rule could result in termination of participation in 
Title IV programs, limitation on participation in Title IV programs, or financial penalties. Under regulations effective July 1, 2011, 
ED eliminated 12 “safe harbors” under the incentive payment rule and codified a stricter reading of the rule.

We believe that our current employee compensation and third-party contractual arrangements comply with the incentive payment 
rule currently in effect. However, certain ambiguities in the final rule, ED’s accompanying statements in the rule release, and 
guidance issued by ED in March 2011, create uncertainty as to how the revised rule will be interpreted and enforced by ED. In light 
of these uncertainties, or otherwise, we can make no assurances that ED would not find deficiencies in our past, current, or future 
employee compensation plans and relevant third-party contractual arrangements.

In addition, in recent years, other postsecondary educational institutions have been named as defendants to whistleblower 
lawsuits, known as “qui tam” cases, brought pursuant to the Federal False Claims Act, alleging that an institution’s compensa-
tion practices did not comply with the incentive compensation rule. Any such litigation could be costly and could divert manage-
ment’s time and attention away from the business, regardless of whether a claim has merit.

Gainful Employment. Under the HEA, as amended, proprietary schools are generally eligible to participate in Title IV programs 
only in respect of educational programs that prepare students for “gainful employment in a recognized occupation.” Historically, 
this concept has not been defined in detailed regulations. Final regulations adopted by ED, which generally became effective 
on July 1, 2011, and which we refer to as the Program Integrity Regulations, address certain institutional and program 
eligibility issues, including gainful employment. Under the Program Integrity Regulations, all institutions must use a template 
designed by ED to disclose to prospective students, with respect to each gainful employment program, occupations that the 
program prepares students to enter, total cost of the program, on-time graduation rate, job placement rate, if applicable, and 
the median loan debt of program completers for the most recently completed award year. The Program Integrity Regulations 
included additional rules pertinent to gainful employment programs. A federal court struck down these additional rules and 
left the disclosure requirements in place.

In September 2013, ED convened a negotiated rulemaking committee, which we refer to as the Gainful Employment Rulemaking 
Committee, to prepare proposed regulations to replace those struck down by the federal court. The Gainful Employment 
Rulemaking Committee met in the fall of 2013, but did not achieve consensus on regulatory language. On March 25, 2014, ED 
published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to gainful employment programs. On October 31, 2014, ED published the final 
gainful employment regulations, which we refer to as the Final GE Regulations. The Final GE Regulations are effective July 1, 2015.

The Final GE Regulations establish debt-related measures for determining whether certain postsecondary education programs 
prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation. The Final GE Regulations set forth two debt-to-earnings 
measures: an annual earnings rate, and a discretionary income rate. A program will pass the measures if the program’s gradu-
ates have annual loan payments:

• 

less than or equal to 8% of their total earnings; or

• 

less than or equal to 20% of their discretionary income.

A program that does not pass either of the debt-to-earnings measures and that has an annual earnings rate that is greater than 
8% and less than or equal to 12%, or a discretionary income rate that is greater than 20% and less than or equal to 30%, will be 
in a warning “zone.” A program fails the measures if its annual earnings rate is greater than 12% (or the denominator of the rate 

45

FORM 10-K(annual earnings) is zero) and its discretionary income rate is greater than 30% (or the income for the denominator of the rate 
(discretionary earnings) is negative or zero).

Pursuant to the Final GE Regulations, and subject to the potential for adjustments based on a transition period, a program will 
become ineligible for Title IV funding if it fails both debt-to-earnings measures twice in three consecutive years, or if the 
program is in the warning “zone” for four consecutive years. An institution will be required to provide warnings to students, 
including prospective students, when notified by ED that a program could become ineligible based on its final debt-to-earnings 
measures for the next award year.

In addition to the debt-to-earnings measures, the Final GE Regulations include new requirements related to gainful employment 
programs. For example, the Final GE Regulations require an institution’s most senior executive officer to certify, as part of the 
program participation agreement, that each of its eligible gainful employment programs offered by the institution satisfies 
certain requirements related to institutional and programmatic accreditation and professional licensure or certification exam 
requirements. Also, the Final GE Regulations expand upon the existing gainful employment program disclosure requirements. A 
failure to comply with the Final GE Regulations could result in our institutions losing eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, 
which could, in turn, adversely affect our institutions’ enrollments and revenues and have a material effect on our business.

Student Loan Defaults. Under the HEA, an educational institution may lose its eligibility to participate in some or all of the Title 
IV programs if defaults on the repayment of FFEL Program or Direct Loan Program loans by its students exceed certain levels.

Pursuant to the Higher Education Opportunity Act enacted in 2008, or the HEOA, which amended the HEA, an institution’s cohort 
default rate is calculated as the percentage of borrowers in the cohort who default before the end of the second fiscal year 
following the fiscal year in which the borrowers entered repayment. ED calculates a single cohort default rate for each federal 
fiscal year that includes in the cohort all current or former student borrowers at the institution who entered repayment on any 
FFEL Program or Direct Loan Program loan during that year. Beginning with the three-year cohort default rate for the 2011 cohort 
published by ED in September 2014, three-year cohort default rates are applied for purposes of measuring compliance with the 
requirements. Pursuant to these requirements, if the three-year cohort default rate for any year after 2011 exceeds 40%, an 
institution loses eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, and if the institution’s three-year cohort default rate exceeds 30% 
for three consecutive years, beginning with the 2009 cohort, the institution loses eligibility to participate in Title IV programs. If 
an institution’s cohort default rate is equal to or greater than 30% in any year it must establish a default prevention task force.

In September 2014, ED released APUS’s and HCON’s official three-year cohort default rates for federal fiscal year 2011. The final 
official ED cohort default rate for the federal fiscal years 2009, 2010, and 2011 are as follows:

APUS
HCON

2009

7.2%
6.4%

2010

11.9%
12.7%

2011

13.0%
12.1%

A default rate in excess of allowable levels could result in our institutions losing eligibility to participate in Title IV programs or 
incurring additional costs related to default prevention, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

College Affordability and Transparency Lists. As required by the HEOA, ED publishes on its website lists of the top 5%  
of institutions, in each of nine categories, with (1) the highest tuition and fees for the most recent academic year, (2) the highest 
“net price” for the most recent academic year, (3) the largest percentage increase in tuition and fees for the most recent three 
academic years, and (4) the largest percentage increase in net price for the most recent three academic years. An institution that 
is placed on a list for high percentage increases in either tuition and fees or in net price must submit a report to ED explaining the 

46

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.increases and the steps that it intends to take to reduce costs. ED reports annually to Congress on these institutions and pub-
lishes its reports on its website. ED also posts lists of the top 10% of institutions in each of the nine categories with lowest 
tuition and fees or the lowest net price for the most recent academic year. Under the HEOA, net price means average yearly price 
actually charged to first-time, full-time undergraduate students who receive student aid at a higher education institution after 
such aid is deducted. Currently, APUS is listed as the institution with the ninth lowest tuition among private for-profit, four-year or 
more institutions. APUS is also listed as the institution with the ninth lowest net price among private for-profit, four-year or more 
institutions. We cannot predict with certainty the effect such lists will have on our operations.

Third-Party Servicers. ED regulations permit an institution to enter into a written contract with a third-party servicer for the 
administration of any aspect of the institution’s participation in Title IV programs. The third-party servicer must, among other 
obligations, comply with Title IV requirements and be jointly and severally liable with the institution to the Secretary of 
Education for any violation by the servicer of any Title IV provision. An institution must report to ED new contracts with or any 
significant modifications to contracts with third-party servicers as well as other matters related to third-party servicers. If any 
third-party servicer that we engage does not comply with applicable statute and regulations including the HEA, we may be 
liable for its actions, and we could lose our eligibility to participate in Title IV programs.

Title IV Return of Funds. Under ED’s return of funds regulations, when a student withdraws, an institution must return 
unearned funds to ED in a timely manner. An institution must first determine the amount of Title IV program funds that a student 
“earned” before withdrawal. If the student withdraws during the first 60% of any period of enrollment or payment period, the 
amount of Title IV program funds that the student earned is equal to a pro rata portion of the funds for which the student would 
otherwise be eligible. If the student withdraws after the 60% threshold, then the student has earned 100% of the Title IV 
program funds. The institution must return to the appropriate Title IV programs, in a specified order, the lesser of (i) the 
unearned Title IV program funds or (ii) the institutional charges incurred by the student for the period multiplied by the percent-
age of unearned Title IV program funds. An institution must return the funds no later than 45 days after the date of the institu-
tion’s determination that a student withdrew.

If funds are not timely returned, an institution may be subject to adverse action, including being required to submit a letter of 
credit equal to 25% of the refunds the institution should have made in its most recently completed fiscal year. Under ED 
regulations, late returns of Title IV program funds for 5% or more of students sampled in the institution’s annual compliance 
audit constitute material noncompliance for which an institution generally must submit an irrevocable letter of credit. HCON’s 
Title IV compliance audit for the year ended December 31, 2012 identified a deficiency related to timely return of Title IV program 
funds. In a Preliminary Audit Determination Letter dated July 10, 2013, ED requested additional information from HCON about 
the situation and required HCON to conduct a file review to identify those files that reflected an inaccurate refund. HCON was 
required to post an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $128,290; such letter of credit expires in July 2016. ED has 
indicated that the matter will be addressed as part of its review of HCON’s application for a change of ownership, which is 
described more fully below in “Regulatory Actions and Restrictions on Operations—Change in Ownership Resulting in a Change 
of Control.”

Misrepresentation. Under the HEA and its implementing regulations, ED may fine, suspend or terminate the participation  
in Title IV programs by an institution that engages in substantial misrepresentation regarding the nature of its educational 
program, its financial charges, or the employability of its graduates. In the future, ED could promulgate regulations that expand 
its role in monitoring and enforcing prohibitions on misrepresentation.

Credit Hours. The HEA and current regulations use the term “credit hour” to define an eligible program and an academic year 
and to determine enrollment status and the amount of Title IV program funds an institution may disburse during a payment 
period. The Program Integrity Regulations define the previously undefined term “credit hour” in terms of a certain amount of 

47

FORM 10-Ktime in class and outside class, or an equivalent amount of work. The Program Integrity Regulations also require accrediting 
agencies to review the reliability and accuracy of an institution’s credit hour assignments. If an accreditor identifies systematic 
or significant noncompliance in one or more of an institution’s programs, the accreditor must notify the Secretary of Education.  
If ED determines that an institution is out of compliance with the credit hour definition, ED could require the institution to repay 
any incorrectly awarded amounts of Title IV program funds. In addition, if ED determines that an institution has significantly 
overstated the amount of credit hours assigned to a program, it may fine the institution, or limit, suspend, or terminate its 
participation in Title IV programs.

VAWA and Clery. On April 1, 2014, a negotiated rulemaking committee, convened by ED, reached consensus on proposed 
regulations to address implementation of the changes made by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, or 
VAWA, to section 485(f) of the HEA, otherwise known as the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus 
Crime Statistics Act, or the Clery Act. On October 20, 2014, ED promulgated final regulations to implement changes made by 
VAWA, the Final VAWA Regulations. The Clery Act requires an institution to report to ED and disclose in its annual security 
report, for the three most recent calendar years, statistics concerning the number of certain crimes that occurred on or within 
the institution’s so-called “Clery geography.” Under the Final VAWA Regulations, an institution must report and disclose 
statistics about, for example, crimes of “dating violence,” “domestic violence,” and “stalking,” as defined by the Final VAWA 
Regulations. Also, under the Final VAWA Regulations, an institution’s annual security report must include certain statements 
about what an institution will do to assist persons who allege that they have been a victim of dating violence, domestic 
violence, sexual assault, or stalking; in addition, an institution must publish in its annual security report procedures for institu-
tional disciplinary action in such cases. The Final VAWA Regulations require institutions to provide “primary prevention pro-
grams” for incoming students and new employees and “ongoing prevention and awareness campaigns” for students and 
employees, and to describe these programs and campaigns in their annual security report. A failure to comply with the Final 
VAWA Regulations could result in our institutions being fined or having our eligibility to participate in Title IV programs limited, 
suspended, or terminated, which could, in turn, adversely affect our institutions’ enrollments and revenues and have a material 
effect on our business.

Department of Defense

Service members of the United States Armed Forces are eligible to receive tuition assistance from their branch of service 
through the Uniform Tuition Assistance Program of the DoD, or DOD tuition assistance programs. Service members may use this 
tuition assistance to pursue postsecondary degrees at institutions that are accredited by accrediting agencies recognized by the 
Secretary of Education. For students in APUS undergraduate programs, we have established tuition rates per semester credit 
hour that can be 100% covered by DoD tuition assistance funds provided that the student does not exceed the annual limits per 
student, other than for service members serving in the Coast Guard, which in fiscal 2014 instituted a policy of paying only 75% 
of tuition costs, up to $187.50 per credit hour. At this time, HCON does not participate in DoD tuition assistance programs.

Under a DoD final rule effective January 7, 2013, each institution participating in DoD tuition assistance programs is required  
to sign a Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU, outlining certain commitments and agreements between the institution  
and DoD prior to being permitted to participate in the DoD tuition assistance programs. On May 15, 2014, DoD promulgated  
new regulations and a revised MOU, the 2014 MOU. On July 7, 2014, DoD released revisions to the 2014 MOU. Institutions  
were required to sign the 2014 MOU on or before September 5, 2014 in order to continue to participate in DoD tuition assistance 
programs. APUS signed the 2014 MOU in August 2014.

The 2014 MOU contains requirements and limitations that were not contained in previous MOUs to which APUS was a party. 
Pursuant to the 2014 MOU, among other requirements, institutions must: explain certain ED and Consumer Financial Protection 
Bureau (CFPB) tools to service members, such as ED’s “College Navigator” website or the CFPB’s “Paying for College” website; 
comply with requirements related to readmission policies for servicemembers; abide by new limitations on the use of funds 

48

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.derived from tuition assistance; provide additional academic and student support services; disclose information about transfer 
of credit; in certain circumstances, return tuition assistance funds to DoD (such as when a student ceases to attend or an 
institution cancels a course); offer to service members loan counseling before private student loans are offered or recom-
mended; and comply with ED’s Title IV “program integrity” rules, including rules related to incentive payments and misrepresen-
tation. The 2014 MOU also provides that an institution may only participate in DoD tuition assistance programs if it is accredited 
by an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education, approved for VA funding, and a participant in Title IV 
programs. Additional information regarding the potential risks associated with the 2014 MOU are addressed in the “Risk 
Factors” section of this Annual Report.

On March 14, 2013, DoD issued an instruction restricting the ability of service members in certain duty locations outside the 
continental United States, or overseas locations, to receive DoD tuition assistance for courses offered by institutions of higher 
education that are not parties to contracts with the DoD to provide DoD voluntary education programs at those locations. 
Because we do not have contracts with the DoD to provide instruction at overseas locations, service members who begin a 
postsecondary education program after arrival in an applicable overseas duty location may not use DoD tuition assistance 
programs to pay for their education in our programs until after they have already successfully completed a course with an 
institution that has entered into a contract to provide voluntary education programs at that overseas location. Service members 
who were already enrolled in one of our programs before arriving at an overseas duty location may continue to receive DoD 
tuition assistance for the in-progress program, but they will be encouraged to enroll in courses provided by institutions that 
have entered into contracts with the DoD to provide programs at the applicable overseas duty location.

On January 30, 2014, the DoD, VA, ED, and Federal Trade Commission, in collaboration with the Consumer Financial Protection 
Bureau and Department of Justice, announced a new online student complaint system for service members, veterans, and their 
families to report negative experiences at education institutions and training programs administering the Post-9/11 GI Bill, DoD 
tuition assistance programs, and other military-related education benefit programs. The complaint system is designed to help 
the government identify and address unfair, deceptive, and misleading practices. The complaint system is based on President 
Obama’s April 27, 2012 Executive Order 13607, EO 13607, which requires federal agencies to create a centralized complaint 
system for students receiving federal military and veterans educational benefits to register complaints that can be tracked and 
responded to by relevant agencies. An institution having recurring substantive complaints, or demonstrating an unwillingness to 
resolve complaints, may face a range of penalties, including revocation of its MOU and removal from participation in the DoD 
tuition assistance programs.

Department of Veterans Affairs

The VA administers education benefits provided by federal law, including the Montgomery GI Bill, or GI Bill, and the Post-9/11 
Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008, or Post-9/11 GI Bill. Pursuant to federal law related to those programs, APUS is 
approved to provide education to veterans and members of the selective reserve and their dependents by the state approving 
agencies in Virginia and West Virginia. Programs at each of HCON’s campuses are approved for VA benefits by the state 
approving agency in Ohio.

The Post-9/11 GI Bill expanded education benefits for veterans who have served on active duty since September 11, 2001, 
including reservists and members of the National Guard, as well as benefits available under the GI Bill. The Post-9/11 GI Bill also 
expanded the ability of service members to transfer their benefits to family members. The Post-9/11 GI Bill also provides veterans 
up to $1,000 per academic year for books, supplies, equipment, and other education costs. The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational 
Assistance Improvements Act of 2010, or Improvements Act, revised the calculations of benefits related to tuition and fees under 
the Post-9/11 GI Bill. For a veteran attending a non-public U.S. institution, the Improvements Act provides tuition and fees based 
on the net cost to the veteran (after accounting for state and federal student financial aid, scholarships, institutional aid, fee 
waivers, and similar assistance), up to $20,235.02 per year. Veterans pursuing a program of education on a more than half-time 

49

FORM 10-Kbasis at an on-campus location are eligible for a monthly housing allowance equal to the basic allowance for housing available  
to service members who are at a military pay grade E-5 and have dependents. Veterans pursuing a program of education solely 
through distance education on a more than half-time basis are eligible to receive $754.50 per month.

To the extent that DoD tuition assistance programs do not cover the full cost of tuition for service members, eligible service 
members may also use their benefits under the GI Bill or the Post-9/11 GI Bill through the “Top-Up” program. The “Top-Up” 
program allows active-duty service members to use their GI Bill or Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to pay the difference between the 
total cost of a college course and the amount of DoD tuition assistance that is paid by the military for the course, but is limited 
to 36 months of payments.

Additional Sources of Student Payments

In addition to the Title IV, DoD, and VA programs described above, eligible students may participate in several other financial aid 
programs or receive support from other governmental and private sources. Some of our students finance their own education or 
receive full or partial tuition reimbursement from their employers. Our institutions may offer interest free payment plans of less 
than 12 months to students to assist them with the financing of educational expenses. Our institutions enter into agreements 
with various employers who provide employee tuition reimbursement plans. Through these agreements our institutions agree to 
a variety of terms, including terms related to the provision of tuition grants to eligible employees. In certain circumstances, our 
students may access alternative loan programs from private lenders. Alternative loans from private lenders are intended to 
cover the difference between what the student receives from all financial aid sources and certain costs of the student’s 
education. Students can apply to a number of different private lenders for this funding. As part of an institution’s Title IV PPA, 
the institution must adopt a code of conduct pertaining to student loans, including alternative loans.

Consumer Protection

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, has pursued enforcement actions against certain for-profit institutions of 
higher education and has released several reports that directly address issues related to institutions of higher education. On 
August 29, 2012, the CFPB submitted a report to several congressional committees entitled “Private Student Loans.” The report 
contained specific suggestions for Congressional action to restructure the student lending experience, including possibly 
requiring institutions to certify that a student is not eligible for any further federal student financial aid funds before a private 
loan may be issued to such student. On October 18, 2012 the CFPB released a report entitled “The Next Front? Student Loan 
Servicing and the Cost to Our Men and Women in Uniform.” The report details the challenges that some service members have 
encountered when utilizing private and federal student loans. On October 16, 2014, the CFPB Student Loan Ombudsman released 
its third annual report analyzing more than 5,300 complaints the CFPB received from private student loan borrowers between 
October 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014. We do not know what enforcement actions the CFPB may pursue, or what steps 
Congress or federal agencies may take, in response to these reports and whether such actions (if any) will have an adverse 
effect on our business or results of operations.

On January 31, 2013, the CFPB encouraged institutions of higher education, students, and others to provide information to the 
CFPB about the financial products and services currently offered to students, and comments on how current and future arrange-
ments between higher education institutions and financial institutions could be structured in order to promote positive financial 
decision-making among consumers. In response to those comments, the CFPB issued its findings on campus banking products 
during a forum held in September 2013. In December 2013 and again in February 2014, the CFPB issued a request asking 
financial institutions to voluntarily make available on their websites agreements with colleges and universities to market deposit 
accounts, prepaid cards, debit cards, and other financial products to students. In February 2014, the Government Accountability 

50

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Office, or GAO, issued a report on college debit cards in which the GAO recommended that Congress consider requiring financial 
institutions that provide debit and prepaid card services to colleges and universities to publicly disclose their agreements. The 
GAO report included a letter from ED, concurring with GAO’s recommendations and indicating that the issue would be consid-
ered by the Program Integrity and Improvement negotiated rulemaking committee scheduled to meet in spring 2014. The 
negotiated rulemaking committee failed to reach consensus, and as result ED may propose language not considered by the 
negotiators. July 1, 2016 is the earliest that any proposed final rule could go into effect.

On February 21, 2013, the CFPB issued a Notice and Request for Information soliciting input on affordable repayment options for 
borrowers with existing student loans. Based on the comments received, in May 2013, the CFPB issued a report analyzing the 
impact of student loan burdens and proposing a number of policy and market-based solutions. On December 3, 2013, the CFPB 
issued a final rule that allows the CFPB to supervise certain “larger” nonbank federal and private student loan servicers for the 
first time, effective March 1, 2014.

In July 2013, the CFPB issued a bulletin stating that any entity subject to the CFPB’s jurisdiction, whether a third-party collector 
or a creditor collecting its own debts, can be held accountable for any unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices in collecting a 
consumer’s debts. In November 2013, the CFPB issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking announcing that it is 
considering whether rules governing the collection of debts are warranted under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, or 
FDCPA, or other CFPB authorities, and, if so, what types of rules would be appropriate. As part of its proposed rulemaking, the 
CFPB sought comments about applying a regulatory regime similar to the FDCPA, which applies only to third-party debt collec-
tors, to first-party debt collectors. Should the CFPB issue rules regulating first-party debt collectors such rules might apply to our 
institutions, which may adversely impact our collections efforts.

On December 23, 2014, the CFPB issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to establish disclosure requirements for 
prepaid accounts, such as reloadable cards that institutions may use to refund students’ credit balances. The proposed rule 
would require financial institutions to provide certain disclosures to consumers prior to and after the acquisition of a prepaid 
account, including disclosure of terms and fees, and posting sample account agreements online.

Other Issues Related to Consumer Protection and Complaints

Concurrent with release of the Final GE Regulations, ED announced that it will lead an effort to formalize an interagency task 
force to help ensure oversight of for-profit higher education institutions. In particular, ED and other federal and state agencies 
will coordinate their activities and promote information sharing to protect students from unfair, deceptive, and abusive policies 
and practices. ED explained that the task force will build on existing efforts among various federal agencies, and will include  
the Departments of Justice, Treasury and VA, the CFPB, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Securities and Exchange 
Commission. State attorneys general will be invited to participate as well. According to ED, the task force will formalize and 
strengthen a working group that has been working together over the past year and that has coordinated efforts in several 
reviews and investigatory work. The task force will meet at least once each quarter.

Many states have become more active in regulating proprietary education from a consumer protection perspective, specifically 
in regards to enforcement of consumer protection laws and implementation of new regulations by state attorneys general. For 
example, a group of state attorneys general, led by Attorney General Jack Conway of Kentucky, are examining the for-profit 
education industry. Attorney General Conway’s website reports that approximately 30 state attorneys general are participating. 
While we have a strong track record of regulatory compliance, such activities, even if not directed at one of our institutions, may 
make our operating environment more challenging.

51

FORM 10-KOur institutions are recipients of complaints filed with state regulatory authorities, the Better Business Bureau, and posted in 
online forums. Our institutions attempt to resolve such complaints in a cooperative manner. However, even if such complaints 
are resolved or are otherwise unfounded they may still harm the reputation of our institutions.

Compliance with Regulatory Standards and the Effect of Regulatory Violations

Compliance Reviews

Our institutions are subject to announced and unannounced compliance reviews and audits by various external agencies, 
including ED, its Office of Inspector General, state licensing agencies, agencies that guarantee FFEL Program loans, DoD, VA, and 
accrediting agencies. The HEA and ED regulations also require institutions to submit annually a compliance audit conducted by 
an independent certified public accountant in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and applicable ED Office of 
Inspector General audit standards. In addition, to enable the Secretary of Education to make a determination of financial 
responsibility, institutions must annually submit audited financial statements prepared in accordance with ED regulations.

The DoD MOU requires institutions to participate in the DoD Third Party Assessment to ensure that the institution is in compli-
ance with the MOU and that service members are provided quality voluntary education opportunities that meet their needs. A 
Third Party Assessment of AMU was conducted in June 2012 with a revised report submitted in October 2012. The report stated 
that, based on the assessment team’s findings, AMU and APUS were in compliance with the DoD MOU that APUS executed.

Potential Effect of Regulatory Violations

If we fail to comply with the regulatory standards governing Title IV programs, ED could impose one or more sanctions, including 
transferring us to the reimbursement or cash monitoring system of payment, seeking to require repayment of certain Title IV 
program funds, requiring us to post a letter of credit in favor of ED as a condition for continued Title IV certification, taking 
emergency action against us, referring the matter for criminal prosecution, or initiating proceedings to impose a fine or to limit, 
condition, suspend, or terminate our participation in Title IV programs. If such sanctions or proceedings were imposed against us 
and resulted in a substantial curtailment, or termination, of our participation in Title IV programs, our enrollments, revenues, and 
results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

If one of our institutions were to lose its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, or if the amount of available Title IV 
program funds were reduced, we could seek to arrange or provide alternative sources of revenue or financial aid for students. 
Although we believe that one or more private organizations would be willing to provide financial assistance to students 
attending our institutions, there is no assurance that this would be the case, and the interest rate and other terms of such 
financial aid might not be as favorable as those for Title IV program funds. We may be required to guarantee all or part of such 
alternative assistance or might incur other additional costs in connection with securing alternative sources of financial aid. 
Accordingly, the loss of our eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, or a reduction in the amount of available federal student 
financial aid, would be expected to have a material adverse effect on our growth plans and results of operations even if we 
could arrange or provide alternative sources of revenue or student financial aid.

In addition to the actions that may be brought against us as a result of our participation in Title IV, we also may be subject, 
from time to time, to complaints and lawsuits relating to regulatory compliance brought not only by our regulatory agencies, 
but also by other government agencies and third parties, such as present or former students or employees and other members 
of the public.

52

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Regulatory Actions and Restrictions on Operations

Many actions that we may wish to take in connection with our operations are also subject to regulation from a variety of 
agencies. ED’s regulations, state regulatory requirements and accrediting agency standards may, in certain instances, limit our 
ability to acquire or sell institutions, and to establish additional locations and programs. Many states require approval before 
institutions can add new programs, campuses, or teaching locations. HLC, WVHEPC, SCHEV, ACICS, the Ohio State Board of 
Career Colleges and Schools, and the Ohio Board of Regents generally require institutions to notify them, and sometimes require 
institutions to obtain their approval, in advance of opening a new location or implementing new programs.

Change in Ownership Resulting in a Change of Control

ED’s regulations, state regulatory requirements and accreditation standards may limit our ability to acquire, merge, or sell 
institutions, and may impose restrictions on activities following a transaction. These restrictions may impede our ability to grow 
by acquisition, or to dispose of assets, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

A change in control could occur as a result of future transactions in which we are involved, such as corporate reorganizations or 
changes in the Board of Directors. Moreover, as a publicly traded company, the potential adverse effects of a change in control 
could influence future decisions by us and our stockholders regarding the sale, purchase, transfer, issuance, or redemption of our 
stock. In addition, the regulatory burdens and risks associated with a change of control could discourage bids for your shares of 
common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of your shares.

U.S. Department of Education

The HEA provides that an institution which undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change in control loses its eligibility 
to participate in Title IV programs and must apply to ED in order to reestablish such eligibility. ED’s regulations provide that a 
change in control of a publicly traded company occurs in one of two ways: (i) if there is an event that would obligate the 
corporation to file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission disclosing a change in control, or 
(ii) if the corporation has a stockholder that owns at least 25% of the total outstanding voting stock of the corporation and is the 
largest stockholder of the corporation, and that stockholder ceases to own at least 25% of such stock, or ceases to be the 
largest stockholder. As a result, a significant purchase or disposition of our voting stock could be determined by ED to be a 
change in ownership and control pursuant to ED’s regulations.

Upon a change in ownership and control, an institution is ineligible to receive Title IV program funds during the period prior to 
recertification. The HEA provides that ED may temporarily provisionally certify an institution seeking approval of a change in 
ownership and control based on preliminary review of a materially complete application received within 10 business days after 
the transaction. ED may continue such temporary provisional certification on a month-to-month basis until it has rendered a 
final decision on the institution’s application. If ED determines to approve the application after a change in ownership and 
control, it issues a provisional certification, which extends for a period expiring not later than the end of the third complete 
award year following the date of provisional certification. ED’s regulations describe some transactions that constitute a 
change in ownership and control, including the transfer of a controlling interest in the voting stock of an institution or the 
institution’s parent corporation.

When a change in ownership and control occurs, ED applies certain financial tests to determine the financial responsibility of 
the institution in conjunction with its review and approval of the change. The institution generally is required to submit a 
same-day audited balance sheet reflecting the financial condition of the institution immediately following the change in 
ownership. The institution’s same-day balance sheet must demonstrate an acid test ratio of at least 1:1, which is calculated by 
adding cash and cash equivalents to current accounts receivable and dividing the sum by total current liabilities (and excluding 
all unsecured or uncollateralized related party receivables). The same-day balance sheet must demonstrate positive tangible net 

53

FORM 10-Kworth. In addition, when a change in ownership and control occurs and there is a new owner, the institution must submit to ED 
audited financial statements of the institution’s new owner’s two most recently completed fiscal years that are prepared and 
audited in accordance with ED requirements. ED may determine whether the financial statements meet financial responsibility 
standards with respect to the composite score formula. If the institution does not satisfy these requirements, ED may condition 
its approval of the change of ownership on the institution’s agreement to letters of credit, provisional certification, and addi-
tional monitoring requirements. The composite score formula and related ED conditions are described more fully above in 
“Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements—Department of Education—Regulation of Title IV 
Financial Aid Programs—Financial Responsibility.” If the new owner does not have the required audited financial statements, 
ED may impose certain restrictions on the institution, including with respect to adding locations and programs.

On November 1, 2013, as a result of our purchase of all of the outstanding stock in National Education Seminars, Inc., HCON  
was deemed to have undergone a change of ownership and control requiring review by ED in order to reestablish eligibility and 
continue participation in Title IV programs. As required under ED regulations, we timely submitted a change in ownership 
application and required documentation. ED has granted HCON temporary provisional certification until ED makes a determina-
tion on the application for approval of the change in ownership and control. Until that determination, HCON operates under a 
Temporary Provisional Program Participation Agreement, or TPPPA, which initially expired on December 31, 2013. If an institution 
provides requested documentation prior to the expiration of the TPPPA, ED may continue the institution’s provisional certifica-
tion on a month-to-month basis until it has rendered a final decision on the institution’s application. HCON timely submitted the 
necessary documentation prior to the expiration of the TPPPA. As part of ED’s post-closing review of our acquisition of HCON, 
we were notified in March 2014 that additional information regarding our consolidated financial status at the time of closing of 
the acquisition was required prior to ED being able to consider issuance of a final approval. Pursuant to ED’s request, this 
information was submitted to ED in April 2014. In addition, as part of ED’s post-closing review of our acquisition of HCON, in 
May and December 2014, ED requested additional information regarding the putative class action described in Item 3, “Legal 
Proceedings” of this Annual Report; we provided this information to ED shortly after it was requested. The change in ownership 
application for HCON has not yet been approved.

If ED determines to approve the application after a change in ownership and control, it will issue a provisional certification extend-
ing for a period expiring not later than the end of the third complete award year following the date of provisional certification.

State Regulatory Agencies

Many states require institutions of higher education to report or obtain approval of certain changes in ownership or other aspects 
of institutional status, but the types of and triggers for such reporting or approval vary among state regulatory agencies. Many 
states include the sale of a controlling interest of common stock in the definition of a change in control requiring approval. A 
change in control under the definitions of a state agency that regulates us may require us to obtain approval of the change in 
ownership and control in order to maintain our state approval. Under certain circumstances, WVHEPC and the SCHEV may require 
us to seek approval of changes in ownership and control in order to maintain APUS’s state authorization or licensure.

We were required to seek, and we obtained, approval from the Ohio State Board of Career Colleges and Schools and the Ohio 
Board of Regents for the change in ownership and control of HCON. In the future, if we attempt to acquire other institutions, the 
states regulating the target institutions may require us to seek approval, which may or may not be granted.

Accreditors

Many accrediting agencies require institutions of higher education to report or obtain approval for certain changes in ownership 
or other aspects of institutional status, but the types of and triggers for such reporting or approval vary among states and 
accrediting agencies.

54

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.HLC, the accrediting agency for APUS, requires HLC-accredited institutions to inform HLC in advance of any substantive change. 
Examples of substantive changes requiring advance notice to HLC include changes in the legal status, ownership, or form of 
control of the institution, such as the sale of a for-profit institution. HLC must approve a substantive change in advance in order 
to include the change in the institution’s accreditation status. HLC also requires an on-site evaluation within six months to 
confirm the appropriateness of the approval.

Pursuant to policies adopted in 2009 and 2010, HLC oversight extends to defined changes that occur in an institution’s parent or 
controlling entity, and not necessarily in the institution itself. Actions by, or relating to, an accredited institution, including a 
significant acquisition of another institution, significant changes in board composition or organizational documents, and accumu-
lations by one stockholder of greater than 25% of the capital stock could trigger additional reviews of the institution and 
possible change from accredited status to candidate status, which enhances the risks associated with these types of actions.  
In particular, a change from accredited status to candidate status could adversely impact an institution’s ability to participate in 
Title IV programs.

ACICS, the accrediting agency for HCON, requires ACICS-accredited institutions to inform ACICS in advance of any substantive 
change. Examples of substantive changes requiring advance notice to ACICS include changes in the legal status, form of control, 
or ownership of the institution. An institution must notify ACICS of a change of ownership at least 15 days before consummat-
ing the proposed change, and ACICS must act to reinstate the institution’s accreditation status after the change of ownership. 
ACICS also requires an on-site evaluation within six months to confirm the appropriateness of the approval. HCON timely 
notified ACICS of the November 1, 2013 change of ownership, and on December 20, 2013, ACICS granted to HCON a reinstate-
ment of accreditation through December 31, 2016, effective from the date of the change. ACICS conducted on-site quality 
assurance visits in the summer of 2014 and found HCON to be in compliance with accreditation criteria.

Should we attempt to enter into transactions with institutions accredited by other accreditors, we would be required to follow 
the requirements of such accreditors. Our management may not have experience with the accreditors of the target institution, 
which would increase the risks related to such a transaction and management of the institution subsequent to the transaction.

Other Agencies

Pursuant to federal law providing benefits for veterans and reservists, APUS is approved for education of veterans and members 
of the selective reserves and their dependents by the state approving agencies in West Virginia and Virginia. Programs at each 
of HCON’s campuses are approved for VA benefits by the state approving agency in Ohio. In certain circumstances, state 
approving agencies may require an institution to obtain approval for a change in ownership and control. The state approving 
agency in Ohio approved the November 1, 2013 change of ownership of HCON. However, there is no guarantee that relevant 
state approving agencies would approve future transactions.

Restrictions on Adding Locations and Educational Programs

ED may, as a condition of certification to participate in Title IV programs, require prior approval of new campus locations, 
programs or otherwise restrict the number of programs an institution may add. ED’s regulations also require that it approve any 
change in ownership resulting in a change of control. As described above in “Change in Ownership Resulting in a Change of 
Control,” HCON was deemed to have undergone a change of ownership and control on November 1, 2013 requiring review by ED 
in order to reestablish eligibility and continue participation in Title IV programs. ED has granted HCON temporary provisional 
certification on a month-to-month basis pending a decision on HCON’s application for approval of the change in ownership and 
control. While provisionally certified, HCON operates under a Temporary Provisional Program Participation Agreement, or TPPPA, 
which requires HCON to apply for and receive approval from the Secretary of Education for any substantial changes, such as 

55

FORM 10-Kestablishing additional locations, offering academic programs at higher than the bachelor’s degree level, adding a non-degree or 
short-term training program, and adding a degree program.

The HEA requires proprietary institutions of higher education to be in full operation for two years before qualifying to partici-
pate in Title IV programs. However, the applicable regulations in many circumstances permit an institution that is already 
qualified to participate in Title IV programs to establish additional campus locations that are exempt from the two-year rule. 
The new campus location must satisfy all other applicable requirements for institutional eligibility, including approval of the 
additional campus location by the relevant state authorizing agency and the institution’s accrediting agency. ED’s regulations 
also require institutions to report and, in certain cases (such as when an institution is provisionally certified), to seek approval 
for a new additional campus location at which at least 50% of an eligible program will be offered if the institution wants to 
disburse Title IV program funds to students enrolled at that location. Institutions are responsible for knowing whether they 
need approval, and institutions that add locations and disburse Title IV program funds without having obtained any necessary 
approval may be subject to administrative repayments and other sanctions. Under the TPPPA, HCON must obtain ED approval 
for the addition of any new campus location at which at least 50% of an eligible program will be offered and Title IV program 
funds will be disbursed.

A fully certified degree-granting institution generally is not obligated to obtain ED’s approval of an additional program leading to 
a degree at the same level previously approved by ED. Similarly, a fully certified institution generally is not required to obtain 
advance approval for a new program that both prepares students for gainful employment in the same or related recognized 
occupation as an educational program that has previously been designated as an eligible program at that institution and meets 
certain minimum-length requirements. However, as a condition of certification to participate in Title IV programs, ED could 
require prior approval of such programs or otherwise restrict the number of programs an institution may add. In the event that 
an institution is required to obtain ED’s approval for the addition of a new program, fails to do so, and erroneously determines 
that the new educational program is eligible for Title IV program funds, the institution could be liable for repayment of Title IV 
program funds received by the institution or students in connection with that program.

Recent Legislative and Regulatory Activity

Federal Legislative Activity

As a result of budgetary pressures, Congress has enacted several pieces of legislation that impact the funding of Title IV and 
other tuition assistance programs. Due to the substantial amount of federal funds disbursed to schools through Title IV pro-
grams, the large number of students and institutions participating in these programs, and considerable political interest in the 
cost of education, Congress continues to show considerable interest in regulation and oversight of institutions of higher 
education, especially those that are for-profit.

Sequestration and Budgetary Matters

On August 2, 2011, Congress passed the Budget Control Act of 2011 which put into place a series of automatic federal budget 
cuts, known as sequestration. The budget cuts, or sequestration, impact certain federal student aid programs. While the Pell 
Grant program was specifically exempted from the effects of sequestration in fiscal year 2013 and the Consolidated and Further 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 increased the maximum award to $5,830 in the 2015–2016 award year, the Pell Grant 
program could be subject to cuts or changes in the future. While sequestration does not otherwise change the amount or terms 
or conditions of Direct Loan Program loans, including Stafford Loans and PLUS Loans, it raises the loan fee paid by borrowers for 
Direct Loan Program loans disbursed after March 1, 2013. Cuts to ED’s administrative budget could lead to delays in student 
eligibility determinations, and delays in origination and processing of federal student loans.

56

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.After sequestration took effect in March 2013, the Army, Air Force, Coast Guard, and Marine Corps announced the suspension 
of their tuition assistance programs. Congress subsequently approved legislation requiring DoD to restore its tuition assis-
tance programs. In October 2013, the DoD tuition assistance programs were again temporarily suspended as a result of the 
U.S. government partial shutdown. Each branch of the military restored its tuition assistance program through fiscal year 2014. 
As a result of continued uncertainty about the availability of funding, several of the military branches announced changes to 
their tuition assistance programs that took effect in federal fiscal year 2014. For example, the Air Force is no longer authorizing 
tuition assistance for associate’s degrees if the servicemember already has an associate’s degree from the Community College 
of the Air Force, the Army now requires servicemembers to complete one year of service after graduation from Advanced 
Individual Training in order to be eligible for tuition assistance, the Army has reduced the total benefit per servicemember per 
year from $4,500 to $4,000, and the Coast Guard has reduced the benefit payable to 75% of tuition costs, not to exceed 
$187.50 per credit hour. Additional changes to the tuition assistance programs could occur due to congressional action or DoD 
policy and funding changes.

Higher Education Act

The HEA must be periodically reauthorized by the U.S. Congress and each Title IV program must be funded through appropria-
tions acts on an annual basis. The most recent comprehensive reauthorization occurred in 2008 when Congress reauthorized 
most HEA programs through the 2014 federal fiscal year by passing the Higher Education Opportunity Act. Although the current 
HEA authorization expired at the end of the 2014 federal fiscal year, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 
2015 extended funding for Title IV through September 30, 2016.

Congress continues to discuss reauthorization of the HEA. Amendments to the HEA could occur during reauthorization, which 
could require us to modify our business practices and increase administrative costs, thereby negatively impacting our results  
of operations.

Other Congressional Activity

Congress routinely holds committee hearings on issues related to our business or takes other actions that would otherwise 
impact us. During 2014, the Senate Committee on Health Education Labor & Pensions held hearings entitled “Promoting College 
Access and Success For Students With Disabilities”; “Strengthening the Federal Student Loan Program for Borrowers”; 
“Examining Access and Supports for Servicemembers and Veterans in Higher Education”; and “The Role of States in Higher 
Education.” During 2014, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce held hearings entitled “Improving Department 
of Education Policies and Programs Through Independent Oversight”; “Keeping College Within Reach: Meeting the Needs of 
Contemporary Students”; “Reviving Our Economy: How Career and Technical Education Can Strengthen the Workforce”; 
“Examining the Mismanagement of the Student Loan Rehabilitation Process”; and “Keeping College Within Reach: Sharing Best 
Practices for Serving Low-Income and First Generation Students.”

In the spring of 2014 the Senate Subcommittee on Financial & Contracting Oversight sent a survey regarding Title IX compliance 
and sexual violence to 440 four-year institutions of higher education, including APUS. The subcommittee released its report 
based upon its analysis of the responses on July 9, 2014; it found that many institutions are failing to comply with the law and 
best practices when addressing sexual violence among students. We anticipate that Congress and ED will continue to focus on 
compliance with Title IX and the prevention of sexual violence.

57

FORM 10-KRegulatory Activity

College Rating System

President Obama directed ED to develop and publish a new college ratings system by the 2015–2016 school year. On 
December 19, 2014, ED issued a framework for the college ratings system. The first version of the ratings will include predomi-
nantly four-year and two-year institutions; ED does not plan to initially include institutions that do not award degrees or that 
only award graduate degrees. As explained in ED’s framework document, the purpose of the new college ratings system 
includes, but is not limited to: (1) helping “colleges and universities measure, benchmark, and improve across shared principles 
of access, affordability, and outcomes”; (2) providing “better information about college value to students and families to support 
them as they search for and select a college”; and (3) generating “reliable, useful data that policymakers and the public can use 
to hold America’s colleges and universities accountable for key performance measures.” ED has not chosen the metrics that will 
be used in the ratings system, but it is considering using metrics such as completion rates, transfer rates, and labor market 
success. ED requested that the public submit comments on its proposed framework by February 17, 2015. We cannot predict the 
extent to which the college ratings system will impact our institutions’ enrollments or reputation, nor can we predict possible 
regulatory burdens and costs.

PLUS Loans

On October 23, 2014, ED promulgated final regulations addressing one of the other topics covered by the Program Integrity and 
Improvement negotiated rulemaking committee, namely amendments to the Federal Direct PLUS Loan Program. Although the 
Federal Direct PLUS Loan Program amendments are not effective until July 1, 2015, ED announced that it will exercise its 
authority to implement the regulations as soon as possible.

Pending Federal Rulemakings

On December 3, 2014, ED issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that proposes to implement requirements for the teacher 
preparation program accountability system under HEA, and amend the regulations governing the Teacher Education Assistance 
for College and Higher Education (TEACH) Grant Program under HEA such that TEACH Grant program funding would be condi-
tioned on teacher preparation program quality. We cannot predict the extent to which these proposed rules will impact our 
institutions’ enrollments or reputation, nor can we predict possible regulatory burdens and costs.

In spring 2014, the Program Integrity and Improvement negotiated rulemaking committee failed to reach consensus. As a result, 
ED may develop and issue notices of proposed rulemaking addressing cash management issues, such as the regulation of 
campus debit cards, and state authorization of distance education. Because ED failed to issue proposed regulations before 
November 1, 2014, the earliest these regulations could take effect is July 1, 2016. In addition, on December 19, 2014, ED 
announced its intention to form a negotiated rulemaking committee to (1) prepare proposed regulations to establish a new Pay 
as You Earn repayment plan for those not covered by the existing Pay as You Earn Repayment Plan in the Federal Direct Loan 
Program, and (2) establish procedures for Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program loan holders to use to identify U.S. 
military servicemembers who may be eligible for a lower interest rate on their FFEL Program loans under section 527 of the 
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA). ED reserves the right to add to or remove these tentative topics for the proposed 
negotiated rulemaking. We cannot predict the extent to which any rules promulgated by ED will impact our institution, nor can 
we predict possible regulatory burdens and costs.

The States

As discussed above in “Consumer Protection—Other Issues Related to Consumer Protection and Complaints,” many states have 
become more active in regulating proprietary education from a consumer protection perspective, specifically in regards to 

58

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.enforcement of consumer protection laws and implementation of new regulations by state attorneys general. Since our 
institutions operate in many jurisdictions our institutions may be subject to regulations promulgated by a variety of regulators.

Item 1A. Risk Factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making an investment in our common stock, you should 
carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other information contained in this Annual Report, including our “Financial 
Statements and Supplementary Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of 
Operations.” Any of the risk factors described below could significantly and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial 
condition, and results of operations. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks 
and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not material may also adversely affect our business, 
financial condition, operating results, cash flows, and prospects. As a result of the risks and uncertainties described below as 
well as such additional risks and uncertainties, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part 
of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

The ability of active duty service members to enroll in APUS’s courses can be impacted by factors that we do not 
anticipate, which can impact APUS’s registrations and make it more difficult for us to accurately forecast 
expected enrollment.

Due to the variability of military activity and other factors over which we have no control, at times it may be difficult to predict 
APUS’s military enrollments. For example, beginning with registrations for the third quarter of 2010, growth of our net course 
registrations from active duty service members slowed more than we expected. While we do not know all of the factors that 
caused this to occur, we believe that the changes we saw in net course registrations from students who are active service 
members in the United States Armed Forces were in part due to increased operations activity and overseas deployments 
across all branches of the military, particularly the level of activity in the United States Marine Corps. We believe that 
increased demands on many active duty service members, combined with limited internet access associated with some 
deployments, impacted the ability of certain active duty military students to pursue higher education in 2010. The occurrence 
of these or other factors in the future could make it more difficult to predict enrollments. Any decline in APUS enrollments, or 
decline in the growth of enrollments, from active duty military students could have an adverse impact on our total net course 
registrations and revenues.

Tuition assistance programs offered to service members of the United States Armed Forces constituted 
approximately 35% of APUS’s adjusted net course registrations for 2014, and our revenues and number of 
students would decrease if APUS is no longer able to receive funds under these tuition assistance programs  
or tuition assistance is reduced, eliminated, or temporarily suspended.

Service members of the United States Armed Forces are eligible to receive tuition assistance from their branch of service 
through the Uniform Tuition Assistance Program of the Department of Defense, or DoD tuition assistance programs. Service 
members may use DoD tuition assistance programs to pursue postsecondary education at institutions that are accredited by 
accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education and that satisfy other requirements, including execution of, 
and compliance with, a Memorandum of Understanding that specifies terms and conditions of participation in DoD tuition 
assistance programs. A significant portion of our students rely on DoD tuition assistance programs to pay for their education at 
APUS. These programs constituted approximately 35% of APUS’s adjusted net course registrations for 2014. At this time, HCON 
does not participate in DoD tuition assistance programs.

59

FORM 10-KEven temporary suspensions of DoD tuition assistance programs adversely affect our operations. In March 2013, in response  
to automatic, across-the-board reductions in federal spending (also known as “sequestration”), each of the military services 
suspended new enrollments in DoD tuition assistance programs. As a result of Congressional action, each of the services 
reinstated enrollments in DoD tuition assistance programs in April 2013. However, our results of operations in the second 
quarter of 2013 were negatively impacted by these actions, resulting in what we believe were fewer enrollments from service 
members than otherwise would have been expected. In October 2013, DoD tuition assistance programs were temporarily 
suspended as a result of the U.S. government partial shutdown. On October 1, 2013, prior to the government shutdown, APUS 
course registrations for October 2013 were approximately 41,200. As of October 14, 2013, however, approximately 13,100 
registrations had been dropped, resulting in a net course registration reduction of approximately 20% compared to October 
2012. We believe that many of these dropped registrations resulted from the suspension of DoD tuition assistance programs. 
Although DoD resumed its tuition assistance programs after the government shutdown ended, we do not believe that the 
registrations for subsequent months served to replace, or make up, all of the registrations that had been dropped. The U.S. 
Congress has passed legislation to extend government funding for the DoD through September 30, 2015; however, if funding  
is not extended beyond that date, another government shutdown could occur, resulting in another suspension of DoD tuition 
assistance programs. Any future government shutdown or suspension of DoD tuition assistance programs could have a material 
adverse effect on our operations.

While DoD tuition assistance programs were reinstated and the government shutdown ended, budgetary pressures remain, and 
we do not know the full scale of future actions that may be taken with respect to DoD tuition assistance programs, which could 
include eliminating those programs, reducing the funds or benefits (or both) available under those programs or enacting new 
restrictions on participation in those programs. If funds available under DoD tuition assistance programs are reduced or 
eliminated, we believe that most service members would be eligible and able to finance out-of-pocket tuition costs resulting 
from this shortfall using their benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill or the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 
2008, as amended, or the Post-9/11 GI Bill, through the “Top-Up” program. The “Top-Up” program allows active-duty service 
members to use their GI Bill or Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to pay the difference between the total cost of a college course and the 
amount of DoD tuition assistance that is paid by the military for the course. However, we do not know whether in the long-term 
service members would be willing to use the Top-Up option, or whether the increased administrative process in using the 
Top-Up option or covering the shortfall through other funding sources would lead to service members deciding not to enroll or  
to enroll at a slower rate.

Other administrative changes to DoD programs could also have negative effects on our enrollments. For example, in March 
2013, DoD issued an instruction restricting the ability of service members in certain overseas duty locations outside the 
continental United States, or overseas locations, to receive DoD tuition assistance for courses offered by institutions of higher 
education that are not parties to contracts with the DoD to provide DoD voluntary education programs at those locations. 
Because we do not have a contract with the DoD to provide instruction at overseas locations, service members who begin a 
postsecondary education program after arrival at an applicable overseas duty location may not use DoD tuition assistance 
programs to pay for their education in our programs until after they have successfully completed a course with an institution 
that has a contract to provide voluntary education programs at that overseas location. Service members who were already 
enrolled in one of our programs before arriving at an overseas duty location may continue to receive DoD tuition assistance  
for the in-progress program, but they will be encouraged to enroll in courses provided by institutions that have entered into  
a contract with the DoD to provide programs at the applicable overseas duty location.

We are not able to estimate the effect of future expected changes to DoD tuition assistance programs or whether the services 
would impose other criteria in addition to the level of reimbursement that would impact enrollments from service members. 
Changes to the DoD tuition assistance programs have already occurred and we expect changes to the programs in the future. 
For example, the Air Force has decided that it will no longer authorize tuition assistance for associate’s degrees if the service 

60

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.member already has an associate’s degree from the Community College of the Air Force, the Army now requires service 
members to complete one year of service after graduation from Advanced Individual Training in order to be eligible for tuition 
assistance, the Army has reduced the total benefit per service member per year from $4,500 to $4,000, and the Coast Guard has 
reduced the benefit payable to 75% of tuition costs, not to exceed $187.50 per credit hour.

We are also not able to estimate the responses that our competitors would take to reduced DoD tuition assistance payments or 
the willingness of service members to use their Top-Up option or other VA education benefits. In this regard, our competitors, 
particularly those with larger student populations or a smaller concentration of students from the military, may be better 
situated to lower the cost of tuition for service members. If we are no longer able to receive funds from DoD tuition assistance 
programs or those programs are reduced, eliminated, or temporarily suspended, our enrollments and revenues could be signifi-
cantly reduced, which would result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The DoD’s revised Memorandum of Understanding includes terms and conditions that impose extensive new 
regulatory requirements on APUS with respect to participation in DoD tuition assistance programs.

Under a DoD final rule, effective January 7, 2013, each institution participating in DoD tuition assistance programs is required to 
sign a Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU, outlining certain commitments and agreements between the institution and 
DoD prior to accepting funds from DoD tuition assistance programs. On May 15, 2014, DoD promulgated new regulations and a 
revised MOU, the 2014 MOU. On July 7, 2014 DoD released revisions to the 2014 MOU. Institutions were required to sign the 
2014 MOU on or before September 5, 2014 in order to continue to participate in DoD tuition assistance programs. APUS signed 
the 2014 MOU and continues to participate in the DoD tuition assistance program subject to its terms. HCON does not partici-
pate in DoD tuition assistance programs and therefore has not signed the 2014 MOU; however, HCON may participate in DoD 
tuition assistance programs in the future and would become subject to the DoD requirements related to tuition assistance and 
associated risks at that time. The 2014 MOU contains many requirements and limitations that were not contained in previous 
MOUs to which APUS was a party. Pursuant to the 2014 MOU, among other requirements, institutions must: explain certain ED 
and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) tools to service members, such as ED’s “College Navigator” website and the 
CFPB’s “Paying for College” website; comply with requirements related to readmission policies for servicemembers; abide by 
new limitations on the use of funds derived from tuition assistance; provide additional academic and student support services; 
disclose information about transfer of credit; in certain circumstances, return tuition assistance funds to DoD (such as when a 
student ceases to attend or an institution cancels a course); offer to service members loan counseling before private student 
loans are offered or recommended; and comply with ED’s Title IV “program integrity” rules, including rules related to incentive 
payments and misrepresentation. The 2014 MOU also provides that an institution may only participate in DoD tuition assistance 
programs if it is accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by ED, approved for VA funding, and a participant in Title IV 
programs. We cannot predict how DoD will interpret and enforce these requirements or what type of immediate sanctions, if 
any, will be implemented before an institution loses the ability to participate in DoD tuition assistance programs for failure to 
comply with certain provisions of the 2014 MOU. If we fail to comply with the requirements of the 2014 MOU, we will not be 
able to participate in DoD tuition assistance programs, which could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations 
and financial condition.

If APUS does not maintain continued strong relationships with various military bases and educational service 
officers, and if APUS is unable to expand the use of articulation agreements, our future growth may be impaired.

APUS has non-exclusive articulation agreements or memoranda of understanding with various educational institutions of the 
United States Armed Forces and other governmental education programs. Articulation agreements and memoranda of under-
standing are agreements pursuant to which we agree to award academic credits toward our degrees for learning in educational 
programs offered by others. Additionally, APUS relies on relationships with educational service offices on military bases and 

61

FORM 10-Kbase education officers to distribute information about APUS to interested service members. If APUS’s relationships with 
educational service offices or base education counselors deteriorate or end, our efforts to recruit students from those bases 
could be impaired. If APUS’s articulation agreements and memoranda of understanding are eliminated, or if APUS’s relationships 
with educational service offices or base education counselors deteriorate, this could materially and adversely affect our 
financial condition.

Furthermore, the 2014 MOU and the related increased focus by the DoD on relationships and oversight of educational providers 
could lead to changes in the nature of our relationships with military bases and educational service officers, which could be 
adverse in nature.

Our business could be harmed if our institutions experience a disruption in their ability to process student loans 
under the Federal Direct Loan Program.

We collected a substantial portion of our fiscal year 2014 consolidated revenue from receipt of Title IV financial aid program 
funds. Any processing disruptions by ED, by our institutions, or by third-party service providers may impact the ability of our 
institutions’ students to obtain student loans on a timely basis. If our institutions experience a disruption in their ability to 
process student loans through the Federal Direct Loan Program, either because of administrative challenges on their part or the 
part of their vendors, or the inability of ED to process Title IV funds on a timely basis, it could have a material adverse effect on 
our institutions’ business and on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

As part of our business strategy, we have entered into, and may enter into or seek to enter into, business 
combinations and acquisitions that may be difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value  
or divert management attention.

On November 1, 2013, we completed our acquisition of National Education Seminars, Inc., which we refer to as Hondros College 
of Nursing, or HCON. We may seek to enter into additional business combinations or acquisitions in the future. Acquisitions are 
typically accompanied by a number of risks, including:

•  difficulties in consolidating operations and in integrating information technology and other systems, as well as the inability 

to maintain uniform standards, controls, policies and procedures;

•  distraction of management’s attention from normal business operations during the acquisition and integration processes;

• 

inability to obtain, or delay in obtaining, approval of the acquisition from the necessary regulatory agencies, or the imposition 
of operating restrictions or a letter of credit requirement on us or on the acquired institution;

•  challenges relating to conforming non-compliant financial reporting procedures to those required of a subsidiary of a U.S. 

reporting company, including procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

•  expenses associated with the integration efforts; and

•  unidentified issues not discovered in our due diligence process, including legal contingencies.

Any inability to integrate completed acquisitions in an efficient and timely manner, including the HCON acquisition, could have 
an adverse impact on our results of operations. Further, acquisitions have resulted in us recording goodwill and may again in the 
future. If such acquisitions are not successful, our goodwill may become impaired, which would have an adverse impact on our 
financial condition. In addition, our acquisition of an educational institution could be considered a change in ownership and 
control of the acquired institution under applicable regulatory standards, as in the HCON acquisition. For such an acquisition, we 
may need approval from ED, applicable state agencies and accrediting agencies, and possibly other regulatory bodies. Our 
inability to obtain such approvals with respect to a completed acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our business, 
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If we are not successful in completing acquisitions, we may incur 

62

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.substantial expenses and devote significant management time and resources without a productive result. In addition, future 
acquisitions could require use of substantial portions of our available cash, as in the HCON acquisition, dilutive issuances of 
securities, or issuances of debt, which could adversely affect our business.

We have continued to experience increases in our institutions’ administrative and infrastructure expenses, 
unpredictability in our institutions’ enrollment and exposure to bad debt.

Since American Public University System, or APUS, began participating in Title IV programs, a significant portion of our growth 
has been attributable to students using funds from those programs. As a result, we have experienced a change in the composi-
tion of our student body, which has resulted, and will continue to result, in a need to provide a greater level of services to our 
students. The HCON acquisition has further changed the composition of our student body, increasing the number of students 
using Title IV program funds, as well as adding students who attend classes at physical campuses. Our costs and expenses have 
increased due in part to increased general and administrative expenses related to these changes and primarily attributable to 
an increase in expenditures for financial aid processing, expenditures for technology required to support the increase in 
non-military students at APUS and increased bad debt primarily associated with non-military students at APUS. In order to 
support the number of APUS students we now have, plan for the future, and provide the technology experience and access 
across a variety of platforms that we believe students have come to expect, we anticipate that we will continue to make 
significant investments in our technology infrastructure and financial aid processing capabilities.

We have experienced an increase in our bad debt expense over the last several years, particularly at APUS. We believe our 
increase in bad debt expense is primarily driven by a change in our student body at APUS, operational policies, processing 
challenges, and collection management. In the second half of 2015, we plan to change the method by which we disburse Federal 
Student Aid from a single disbursement method to a multiple disbursement method for first-time APUS undergraduate students. 
While this change may adversely impact enrollment, we are making this change in order to potentially lower bad debt expense 
and to reduce the attractiveness of our programs to students who are seeking to take improper advantage of federal student aid 
programs. We have no assurance that this change will be successful at reducing bad debt. If we are unable to make appropriate 
improvements, or if our improvements are not as effective as anticipated, our bad debt expense could increase, which could 
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

We rely on third-party vendors whose service and responsiveness may be less than ours and whose compliance 
practices may increase our operational and compliance risk.

We rely on third-party vendors to provide certain services to our institutions and their students. While we monitor and assess 
the service of these vendors, it is possible that the quality of their service and the timeliness of their responses may be less 
than the service and responsiveness that we or our institutions would provide. These third-party vendors may lack adequate 
business continuity planning. Using third-party vendors increases compliance risk that the vendors may not adequately protect 
personal information regarding our institutions’ students and their families, or that they may not comply with applicable federal 
or state regulations applicable to our institutions’ businesses. Further, transitioning from existing vendors or from in-house 
processes to new providers involves inherent risks, including the risk of significant disruptions of integral processes. In the event 
third-party vendors fail to provide services, lack adequate continuity planning, or fail to provide necessary implementation or 
transition services, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

63

FORM 10-KWe have encountered ongoing problems related to the software and services of a third-party vendor that we use 
to assist with APUS’s financial aid processing, which could result in adverse regulatory actions and reputational 
problems and negatively affect our operating results, and we may experience risks and costs related to any 
potential transition of these services to a different third-party vendor.

In the beginning of the third quarter of 2013, APUS transitioned from using the services of a third-party servicer to assist with 
the administration and management of APUS’s participation in Title IV programs to utilizing an internal solution that relies, in 
part, on software and services provided by a third-party vendor. We have continued to experience unexpected delays in 
financial aid processing as a result of various software and programming errors and limitations, resulting in ED rejecting certain 
student records, an inability to disburse Title IV program funds to some students and other related issues. While we had 
anticipated that in connection with the transition there would be a delay in processing financial aid for a short period of time, 
the delays were longer than expected and there were more errors than expected. In addition, when the decision was made to 
move financial aid processing in-house using software supplied by a third-party vendor, we anticipated being able to automate 
certain manual processes. Errors in the software, as well as lack of experience with the software by many of our financial aid 
staff, required manual work outside the system, increasing the time to process financial aid.

APUS has worked with the vendor to identify the causes of the delays, errors and problems. Many have been resolved, but 
some remain, and APUS continues to perform manual work outside the automated system to process financial aid. In addition  
to regulatory problems, the challenges with the processing of financial aid have led to, and could lead to further, reputational 
problems, adverse effects on our operating results, reduced course enrollments, and increased costs. APUS has decided to work 
towards being in a position to transition its financial aid processing system to its former third-party vendor. There would be 
significant costs and risks relating to a new vendor’s implementation. These costs will possibly include costs paid directly to a 
new vendor, costs related to the efforts of employees and management, costs associated with the transition and training of 
employees, and costs incurred in terminating APUS’s relationship with its existing software vendor. Further, a transition may 
divert management’s attention, which could adversely impact our overall business.

We have described additional risks related to this situation, Title IV compliance, and the use of third-party servicers in these 
Risk Factors. Those risks and the issues explained in this risk factor may have a material adverse effect on our operations and 
financial condition.

We may have unanticipated tax liabilities that could adversely impact our results of operations and  
financial condition.

We and our institutions are subject to multiple types of taxes in the U.S. and may be subject to taxation in the future in various 
foreign jurisdictions. The determination of our provision for income taxes and other tax accruals involves various judgments, and 
therefore the ultimate tax determination is subject to uncertainty. In addition, changes in tax laws, regulations, or rules, or 
application of state sales taxes, may adversely affect our future reported financial results, may impact the way in which we 
conduct our business, or may increase the risk of audit by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or other tax authorities. Although 
we believe our tax accruals are reasonable, the final determination of tax returns under review or returns that may be reviewed 
in the future and any related litigation could result in tax liabilities that materially differ from our historical income tax provisions 
and accruals. In addition, an increasing number of states are adopting new laws or changing their interpretation of existing laws 
regarding the apportionment of service revenues for corporate income tax purposes in a manner that could result in a larger 
proportion of our income being taxed by the states in which we sell services. These legislative and administrative changes could 
have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

64

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.We rely on dividends, distributions and other payments, advances and transfers of funds from our operating 
subsidiaries to meet our obligations and to fund acquisitions and certain investments.

We rely on dividends, distributions and other payments, advances and transfers of funds from our operating subsidiaries to meet 
our obligations and to fund acquisitions and certain investments. We conduct all of our operations through our subsidiaries, and 
as of December 31, 2014 had no significant assets other than cash, the capital stock of our respective subsidiaries, and assets 
related to several investments. As a result, we rely on dividends and other payments or distributions from our operating 
subsidiaries to meet our obligations and to fund acquisitions and investments. The ability of our operating subsidiaries to pay 
dividends or to make distributions or other payments to us depends on their respective operating results and may be restricted 
by, among other things, the laws of their respective jurisdictions of organization, regulatory and accreditation requirements, 
agreements entered into by those operating subsidiaries, and the covenants of any future obligations that we or our subsidiaries 
may incur.

Prior to our acquisition of HCON we had no experience operating physical campuses where students attend 
class and otherwise participate in educational activities. Having students physically present on such 
campuses may result in threats to student safety and other issues with which we had no experience prior to the 
HCON acquisition.

Prior to the HCON acquisition, we owned one institution, APUS, which is a provider of exclusively online postsecondary 
education. As a result of the HCON acquisition, we now manage and monitor on-the-ground operations at four physical cam-
puses where HCON students attend classes and participate in educational activities. The presence of students on physical 
campuses requires us to consider and respond to issues related to student safety, security, and violence. Prior to our acquisition 
of HCON we had no experience with these or other issues that may arise in connection with on-the-ground operations on 
physical campuses. Failure to prevent, or adequately respond to, threats to student and employee safety or other problems could 
harm our reputation, causing enrollment and revenues to decline or could result in costly and resource-intensive litigation.

In connection with our operation of HCON’s physical campuses, we face new regulatory requirements of a type with which we 
have no experience. HCON must comply with the campus safety and security reporting requirements as well as other require-
ments in the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, or Clery Act, including recent 
changes made to the Clery Act by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, or VAWA. On October 20, 2014,  
ED published a final rule implementing those statutory changes. The final rule requires, among other things, that institutions 
maintain statistics about the number of incidents of dating violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking that meet 
the definitions of those terms as set forth in the final rule; institutions provide incoming students and new employees with, and 
describe in their annual security reports, their primary prevention and awareness programs; institutions provide students and 
employees with, and describe in their annual security reports, their ongoing prevention and awareness campaigns; and that 
institutions provide and describe in their annual security reports each type of disciplinary proceeding used by the institution, 
which must be prompt, fair, and impartial. The new regulations are effective July 1, 2015. Compliance with these new regula-
tions could increase HCON’s administrative costs, which would have a negative impact on our results of operations. Failure to 
comply with the Clery Act requirements or regulations promulgated by ED could result in action by ED to fine our institutions or 
to limit or suspend our institutions’ participation in Title IV programs.

Natural disasters or other extraordinary events may cause us to close one or more of HCON’s campuses or may 
cause HCON’s enrollment and revenues to decline.

HCON may experience business interruptions resulting from natural disasters, inclement weather, transit disruptions or other 
events in one or more of the cities in Ohio in which it operates. These events could cause HCON to close campuses—temporarily 

65

FORM 10-Kor permanently. Further, a regional or national outbreak of influenza or other illness easily spread by human contact could cause us 
to close one or more of HCON’s campuses for an extended period of time. These events could affect student recruiting opportuni-
ties in those locations, causing enrollment and revenues to decline.

We have limited experience in making investments in other entities, and any such investments may not result in 
strategic benefits for us or could expose us to other risks.

To assist us in achieving elements of our growth strategy or to further develop our business capabilities, from time to time we 
will consider and may pursue strategic investments and acquisitions. These transactions could include, among other things, 
investments in, partnerships or joint ventures with, or the acquisition of other schools, service providers or education technology 
related companies, among other types of entities. Investing in another entity requires expertise in evaluating another entity’s 
business and identifying strategic benefits of a potential investment in such entity, among other expertise. These types of 
investments involve significant challenges and risks, including that the investment does not advance our business strategy, that 
it has an adverse effect on our results of operations, that we do not realize a satisfactory return on our investment, that we 
acquire unknown liabilities, or that management’s attention is diverted from our core business. These events could harm our 
operating results or financial condition. Any investments in other entities may also subject us to the operating and financial risks 
of such entities, and we rely on the internal controls and financial reporting controls of such entities.

Since 2012, we have made minority investments in entities in which we do not have sole control, which present risks in addition 
to those that apply to other investments or acquisitions. These investments include our $6.8 million equity investment in a 
holding company that acquired and now operates New Horizons Worldwide, Inc., or New Horizons, our $4.0 million investment 
in preferred stock of Fidelis Education, Inc., or Fidelis Education, and our $1.5 million investment in preferred stock of Second 
Avenue Software, Inc., or Second Avenue. Although we have the right to representation on the Board of Directors of the holding 
company of New Horizons, the Board of Directors of Fidelis Education, and the Board of Directors of Second Avenue, we do not 
have the ability to control the policies, management or affairs of these entities, and generally we would not have that ability in 
any minority investment in an entity. The interests of persons who control the entities in which we have and may invest may 
differ from our interests, and they may cause such entities to take actions that are not in our best interest, and we may become 
involved in disputes with such persons. Our inability to control entities in which we make minority investments could negatively 
affect our ability to realize the strategic benefits of those investments.

We have made minority investments to realize strategic benefits for our business, rather than to generate income or capital gains 
from these investments, and we anticipate that we would make future minority investments for similar purposes. We cannot 
ensure that we will realize any strategic benefits from these investments in the near-term or at all. To the extent that the strategic 
benefits of any investment are not timely realized, or the investment otherwise underperforms, we may wish to dispose of the 
investment. Because our interests in entities in which we have made minority investments, such as New Horizons, Fidelis 
Education, and Second Avenue are highly illiquid and not traded in any public market, we may not be able to timely dispose of 
these interests, or may have to sell at less than our carrying value. Further, should the value of these investments become 
impaired, we may be required to reduce the carrying value of these investments. Our inability to dispose of our interest in such an 
entity, or a reduction in the carrying value of such an entity on our books, would negatively affect our operating results.

The loss of any key member of our management team may impair our ability to operate effectively and may harm 
our business.

Our success depends largely upon the continued services of our executive officers and other key management and technical 
personnel. The loss of one or more of our key personnel could harm our business. While we have employment agreements with 
each of our Executive Vice Presidents, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Boston, and certain HCON employees, we 

66

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.do not have employment agreements with other executives or personnel, and the employment agreements that we do have do 
not prevent our executives from voluntarily ceasing to work for us.

If we are unable to attract and retain management, faculty, administrators and skilled personnel, our business 
and growth prospects could be severely harmed.

We must attract and retain highly qualified management, faculty, administrators, and skilled personnel to our institutions. 
Competition for hiring these individuals is intense, especially with regard to faculty in specialized areas, or executives with 
relevant industry expertise. Our institutions’ past growth created constant demands to find qualified individuals across all 
levels, and we believe that we need to continue to expand and strengthen our management team to support the operations  
of our institutions. If we fail to attract new management, faculty, administrators, or skilled personnel or fail to retain and 
motivate our existing management, faculty, administrators, and skilled personnel, our institutions and our ability to serve our 
students and expand our programs could be severely harmed. ED’s incentive payment rule may also affect the manner in 
which we attract, retain, and motivate new and existing employees, as described more fully below in “Risks Related to the 
Regulation of our Industry.”

If our institutions fail to maintain adequate systems and processes to detect and prevent fraudulent activity  
in student enrollment and financial aid, our institutions may lose the ability to participate in Title IV programs  
or Department of Defense tuition assistance programs, or have participation in these programs conditioned  
or limited.

Institutions offering online education, including APUS, have experienced fraudulent activity related to Title IV program funds. 
Grants and loans to students under Title IV programs are primarily awarded on the basis of financial need, generally defined as 
the difference between the cost of attending an institution and the amount a student can be expected to contribute to that 
cost. In order to account for living expenses and other costs that our students may reasonably incur in the context of pursuing a 
degree or certificate, the cost of attending each of our institutions is an amount that exceeds the cost of its tuition. While some 
students elect to receive grants and loans that cover only the cost of tuition and fees, others elect to receive amounts up to the 
full cost of attendance. When one of our institutions receives Title IV program funds on a student’s behalf, it credits those funds 
to the student’s account. If a student has elected to receive funds in excess of the cost of tuition and fees, a credit balance 
occurs, and the institution must pay that credit balance to the student unless the student has authorized the institution to hold 
the credit balance or take other permissible action with respect to the credit balance. The availability of Title IV program funds, 
including any credit balance payment, is an important part of enabling some students to pursue a degree or certificate. However, 
some individuals seek to take advantage of Title IV programs by enrolling for the purpose of obtaining funds they may receive 
directly through a credit balance payment. On September 26, 2011, ED’s Inspector General released a report about an increasing 
number of cases involving large, loosely affiliated groups of individuals, so-called “fraud rings,” who conspire to defraud Title IV 
programs through enrollment in distance education programs. These fraud rings take advantage of the availability of credit 
balance payments under Title IV.

Our institutions have been the target of fraudulent activity related to Title IV program funds, as well as other fraudulent 
activities, and as our institutions grow they may be susceptible to an increased risk of such activities. The potential for outside 
parties to perpetrate fraud in connection with the award and disbursement of Title IV program funds at APUS, including as a 
result of identity theft, may be heightened due to its being an exclusively online education provider and its relatively low tuition. 
Our institutions must maintain systems and processes to identify and prevent fraudulent applications for enrollment and 
financial aid. We cannot be certain that our institutions’ systems and processes will continue to be adequate in the face of 
increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes, or that we will be able to expand such systems and processes at a pace consistent 
with our growth.

67

FORM 10-KED requires institutions that participate in Title IV programs to refer to the ED Office of the Inspector General, or OIG, credible 
information about fraud or other illegal conduct involving Title IV programs, and in the past we have referred to the OIG 
information with respect to potential fraud by applicants and students. If the systems and processes that our institutions have 
established to detect and prevent fraud are inadequate, ED may find that our institutions do not satisfy ED’s “administrative 
capability” requirements. If our institutions fail to satisfy the “administrative capability” requirements, ED may require the 
repayment of federal student financial aid funds, transfer our institutions from the “advance” system of payment of Title IV 
program funds to cash monitoring status, or to the “reimbursement” system of payment, place our institutions on provisional 
certification status, or commence a proceeding to impose a fine or to limit, suspend, or terminate our institutions’ participation 
in Title IV programs, which would limit our institutions’ potential for growth and adversely affect our institutions’ enrollment, 
revenues, and results of operations. In addition, our institutions’ ability to participate in Title IV programs and DoD tuition 
assistance programs is conditioned on maintaining accreditation by an accrediting agency that is recognized by the Secretary of 
Education. The significance of accreditation is described more fully above in “Regulatory Environment—Accreditation.” Any 
significant failure to adequately detect fraudulent activity related to student enrollment and financial aid could cause our 
institutions to fail to meet their accreditors’ standards. Furthermore, under the Higher Education Opportunity Act, accrediting 
agencies that evaluate institutions offering online programs like APUS’s must require such institutions to have processes 
through which the institution establishes that a student who registers for such a program is the same student who participates 
in and receives credit for the program. Failure to meet the standards of our institutions’ accrediting agencies could result in the 
loss of accreditation of one or more of our institutions, which could result in their loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV 
programs, DoD tuition assistance programs, or both.

Our limited ability to obtain exclusive proprietary rights and protect our intellectual property, as well as disputes 
we may encounter from time to time with third parties regarding our use of their intellectual property, could 
harm our operations and prospects.

In the ordinary course of business, our institutions develop intellectual property of many kinds that is or will be the subject of 
patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, domain names, agreements, and other registrations. Our institutions have 
secured rights to trademarks for various names and terms used in our business, own rights to more than 200 internet domain 
names pertaining to APUS, AMU, APU, HCON and other unique descriptors, have been issued a patent for PAD, and have 
pursued patents on several innovations that we believe enhance and support students’ academic achievement and streamline 
university operations. Our institutions rely on agreements under which we obtain rights to use course content developed by 
faculty members and other third-party content experts.

We cannot assure you that these measures, or any measures that our institutions take, will be adequate, or that they have 
secured, or will be able to secure, appropriate protections for all of our institutions’ proprietary rights in the United States or 
foreign jurisdictions, or that third parties will not infringe upon or violate the proprietary rights of our institutions. Despite our 
efforts to protect these rights, third parties may attempt to develop competing programs or copy aspects of our institutions’ 
curriculum, online resource material, quality management, and other proprietary content. Any such attempt, if successful, could 
adversely affect our institutions’ business. Protecting these types of intellectual property rights can be difficult, particularly as  
it relates to the development by our institutions’ competitors of competing courses and programs.

Our institutions may encounter disputes from time to time over rights and obligations concerning intellectual property, and may 
not prevail in these disputes. Third parties may raise a claim against our institutions alleging an infringement or violation of the 
intellectual property of that third party. In July 2006, APUS settled a dispute with another institution regarding the use of 
certain marks that allowed us to continue to use the marks at issue, but we may not be able to favorably resolve future dis-
putes. Some third-party intellectual property rights may be extremely broad, and it may not be possible for our institutions to 
conduct operations in such a way as to avoid disputes regarding those intellectual property rights. Any such dispute could 

68

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.subject our institutions to costly litigation and impose a significant strain on our financial resources and management personnel 
regardless of whether that dispute has merit. Our general liability and cyber liability insurance may not cover potential claims of 
this type adequately or at all, and our institutions may be required to alter the content of their courses or pay monetary dam-
ages, which may be significant.

We may incur liability for the unauthorized duplication or distribution of class materials posted online for  
class discussions.

In some instances, our institutions’ faculty members or students may post various articles or other third-party content online in 
class discussion boards or in other venues. The laws governing the fair use of these third-party materials are imprecise and 
adjudicated on a case-by-case basis, which makes it challenging to adopt and implement appropriately balanced institutional 
policies governing these practices. We and our institutions may incur liability for the unauthorized duplication or distribution of 
this material posted online. Third parties may raise claims against us and our institutions for the unauthorized duplication of this 
material. Any such claims could subject us and our institutions to costly litigation and impose a significant strain on financial 
resources and management personnel regardless of whether the claims have merit. Our institutions’ faculty members or 
students could also post classified material on class discussion boards, which could expose us to civil and criminal liability and 
harm our institutions’ reputations and relationships with members of the military and government. Our general liability insurance 
may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at all, and we may be required to pay monetary damages and our 
institutions may be required to alter the content of their courses.

Legal proceedings, particularly class action lawsuits, may require human and financial resources, distract our 
management and negatively affect our reputation and operating results.

From time to time, we and our institutions have been and may be involved in various legal proceedings. In recent years, we have 
observed an increase in litigation brought against for-profit schools, including class actions brought by students and prospective 
students based on alleged misrepresentations about a school’s programs, and an increase in “qui tam” lawsuits, which are 
described below in the first risk factor under the heading “Risks Related to the Regulation of our Industry.” For example, in 
November 2013, a putative class action was brought against HCON relating to a time period prior to our ownership. The lawsuit 
asserted claims for fraud and fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, breach of implied-in-fact contract, promis-
sory estoppel, unjust enrichment, and violation of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, for, among other things, the alleged 
provision of false or misleading information to the named plaintiffs and other putative class members in 2011 and 2012 regard-
ing the status of accreditation by National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission of HCON’s Associate Degree in Nursing, 
or ADN, program offered at its Independence, Ohio campus. HCON and the named plaintiffs entered into a settlement agree-
ment on November 19, 2014 under which the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss their case for a de minimis settlement payment. HCON 
admitted to no wrongdoing in the settlement agreement and the case was dismissed with prejudice. The significant human and 
financial resources required to investigate and respond to claims brought in any future litigation may distract management’s 
attention from operating our business or lead to larger payments or liabilities, including adverse regulatory action, and, as a 
result, negatively affect our operating results.

Changes our institutions may make to their operations to enhance their ability to identify and enroll students 
who are likely to succeed and to improve the student experience may adversely affect our institutions’ 
enrollment, growth rate, profitability, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In order to increase our institutions’ focus on improving the learning experience and attracting students who are likely to persist 
in our institutions’ programs, our institutions may implement changes and initiatives to more effectively admit college-ready 
students, support those students and help improve those student’s educational outcomes, including through initiatives to 

69

FORM 10-Kincrease the level of engagement and collaboration in the classroom. Beginning in the second quarter of 2015, for instance, 
APUS plans to require that prospective students complete a free, non-credit admission course if they are not active duty military 
or veteran applicants, graduates from certified federal, state and local law enforcement and public safety academies, or 
prospective students with at least nine hours of transfer credit with a grade of “C” or better for each course from an accredited 
institution. Additional initiatives may include, but are not limited to, the following:

•  other changes to admissions standards and requirements;

• 

implementing more stringent satisfactory academic progress standards;

•  changing tuition costs and payment options;

•  transitioning student facing services, including student financial aid and advising, to new platforms, as well as the use of the 

ClearPath system;

•  experimenting with competency-based learning and other alternative delivery methods; and

•  altering our institutions’ marketing programs to target the appropriate prospective students.

These initiatives may adversely impact our institutions’ business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, 
particularly in the near term. These initiatives require significant time, energy and resources, and involve many significant 
interrelated and simultaneous changes in our processes and programs. We may not succeed in achieving our objectives due to 
organizational, operational, regulatory or other constraints. If our efforts are not successful, we may experience reduced 
enrollment, increased expense or other impacts on our business that materially and adversely impact our financial condition.

The growth rate of our business is uncertain, and we may not be able to assess our future growth  
prospects effectively.

The growth rate of our business is uncertain, our business may not grow, and we may not be able to assess our future growth 
prospects effectively. Our ability to act on any growth model is dependent on a number of factors, including the success of our 
institutions, the ability to obtain timely regulatory approvals, identify locations and market segments, and recruit and retain 
high-quality academic and administrative personnel. Due to a rapidly evolving industry, a challenging regulatory and government 
budget environment, and broader economic uncertainty, it has become more challenging to forecast our institutions’ enrollments 
and consequently our financial results. These challenges may result in an inefficient deployment of resources, uncertainty in our 
financial results and volatility in our stock price, which may have an adverse effect on the return on an investment in our 
common stock.

Growth may place a strain on resources that could adversely affect our systems, controls and operating 
efficiency, including those of our institutions.

The growth we have experienced in the past, as well as any future growth that we may experience, could place a significant 
strain on our resources and the resources of our institutions and increase demands on our management information and 
reporting systems and financial management controls. We do not have experience scheduling courses and administering 
programs for more students than are currently enrolled at our institutions, and if growth negatively impacts our ability to do  
so, the learning experience for students could be adversely affected, resulting in a higher rate of student attrition and fewer 
student referrals. We also have limited experience adding to our courses, programs and operations through acquisitions. Prior  
to the acquisition of Hondros College of Nursing, or HCON, we had no experience operating physical campuses where students 
attend class and otherwise participate in educational activities, and we have no experience opening new campus locations. 
Future growth will also require continued improvement of our internal controls and systems, particularly those related to 
complying with federal regulations under the Higher Education Act of 1965, or HEA, as administered by the U.S. Department of 
Education, or ED, including as a result of our institutions’ participation in student financial aid programs authorized under Title IV 

70

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.of the HEA, or Title IV programs. We have described some of the most significant regulatory risks that apply to us and our 
institutions, including those related to Title IV programs, under the heading “Risks Related to the Regulation of our Industry” 
below. If we are unable to manage our growth or successfully carry out and integrate acquisitions, including the HCON integra-
tion, we may also experience operating inefficiencies that could increase our costs and adversely affect our profitability and 
results of operations.

The change in the composition of our student body has also made it harder for us to make forecasts about student enrollments. 
We have had more difficulty forecasting the number of students who will enroll and have noticed a decrease in the predictabil-
ity of the rate at which we convert leads into enrolled students, which we attribute, in part, to the growth in non-military 
students, and particularly the growth in non-military students from outside of public safety communities. If we are unable to 
adapt to changes in the composition of our student body and control the growth of related expenditures, we may experience 
operating inefficiencies that could increase our costs and adversely affect our profitability and results of operations. Further, if 
we are unable to attract and retain Title IV students, our financial condition may be adversely impacted.

Future growth or increased technology demands will require continued investment of capital, time, and 
resources to develop and update our institutions’ technology, and if we are unable to increase the capacity  
of our institutions’ resources appropriately, our institutions’ ability to handle growth and to attract or retain 
students, and our financial condition and results of operations, could be adversely affected.

Our expectations for future growth require an increase in the capacity and capabilities of our institutions’ technology infrastruc-
ture. Increasing the capacity and capabilities of our institutions’ technology infrastructure will require us to invest capital, time, 
and resources, which we expect from time to time will lead to increased spending on technology infrastructure, not all of which 
can be capitalized. There is no assurance that, even with sufficient investment, our systems will be scalable to accommodate 
future growth. We will also need to invest capital, time, and resources to update our institutions’ technology in response to 
competitive pressures in the marketplace, including increased demands for interactive solutions and access from mobile 
platforms, as well as to allow for differential pricing, and we will have to make similar investments to integrate the technology 
systems of HCON and any other business we may acquire in the future. If we are unable to increase the capacity of our 
institutions’ resources or update their resources appropriately, their ability to handle growth and to attract or retain students, 
and our financial condition and results of operations, could be adversely affected. Similarly, even if we are able to increase the 
capacity of our institutions’ resources and update their resources appropriately, our financial condition and results of operations 
could be adversely affected by an increased level of spending.

We may need additional capital in the future, but there is no assurance that funds will be available on  
acceptable terms.

We may need additional capital in the future for various reasons, including to finance business acquisitions and investments in 
technology, but there is no assurance that capital will be available on acceptable terms. We may need to raise additional capital 
in order to achieve growth or fund other business initiatives. Capital may not be available in sufficient amounts or on terms 
acceptable to us and may be dilutive to existing stockholders. Additionally, any securities issued to raise capital may have rights, 
preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. If adequate capital is not available or is not available on 
acceptable terms, our and our institutions’ ability to expand, develop or enhance services or products, or respond to competitive 
pressures, will be limited.

Our access to capital markets and sourcing for additional funding to expand or operate our business may be adversely 
impacted by disruptions and volatility in the credit and equity markets worldwide and concerns regarding the industry in 
general and us in particular. The credit and equity markets of both mature and developing economies have experienced 

71

FORM 10-Kextraordinary volatility, asset erosion and uncertainty during the last several years. Until these market disruptions diminish, it 
may be more difficult to access the capital markets to obtain funding needed to expand our business by acquisition, organi-
cally, or otherwise. In addition, changes in the capital or other legal requirements applicable to lenders and investors may 
affect the availability or increase the cost of raising capital. Credit concerns regarding the proprietary postsecondary educa-
tion industry as a whole also may impede our access to capital markets. If we are unable to obtain needed capital on terms 
acceptable to us, we may have to limit growth initiatives or take other actions that materially adversely affect our business, 
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our business has been and may in the future be adversely affected by a general economic slowdown or 
recession in the U.S. or abroad.

Our business has been and may in the future be adversely affected by a general economic slowdown or recession in the U.S. or 
abroad. Over the past several years, the United States and other industrialized countries have experienced reduced economic 
activity, increased unemployment, substantial uncertainty about their financial services markets and, in some cases, economic 
recession. We believe that these events negatively impacted our results during this time period and may continue to reduce the 
demand for our programs among students in the future, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial 
condition, results of operations and cash flows. These adverse economic developments also may result in a reduction in the 
number of jobs available to our graduates and lower salaries being offered in connection with available employment, which, in 
turn, may result in declines in our placement and persistence rates. In addition, these events could adversely affect the ability or 
willingness of our former students to repay student loans, which could increase our student loan cohort default rate and require 
increased time, attention and resources to manage these defaults. Our institutions’ students are able to borrow Title IV loans in 
excess of their tuition. The excess is received by such students as a stipend. However, if a student withdraws, our institutions 
must return any unearned Title IV funds including stipends and must seek to collect from the student any resulting amounts 
owed to the institution. A protracted economic slowdown could negatively impact such students’ ability to satisfy debts to the 
institution, including debts that result from returns of Title IV amounts. As a result, the amount of Title IV funds we would have 
to return without repayment from our institutions’ students could increase, and our financial results could suffer. Further, the 
impact of economic conditions abroad have not historically had a significant impact on our operations except to the extent they 
impact the U.S. economy, but should we increase our international enrollments the broader global economy will increasingly 
have an impact on our results.

Efforts to diversify our business outside of the traditional areas served by our institutions may adversely impact 
our financial performance.

As we seek opportunities to expand our business and serve markets beyond those traditionally served by our institutions, we 
may encounter strategic and operational challenges different than those within our existing institutions. If we are unable to 
successfully capitalize on these opportunities, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be 
adversely impacted.

Strong competition in the postsecondary education market generally and in the military market could decrease 
our institutions’ market share and increase their cost of acquiring students.

Within the postsecondary education market, our institutions compete primarily with not-for-profit public and private two-year 
and four-year colleges as well as other for-profit schools, particularly those that offer online learning programs. Public institu-
tions receive substantial government subsidies, and public and private not-for-profit institutions have access to government and 
foundation grants, tax-deductible contributions, and other financial resources generally not available to for-profit schools. These 
institutions may have instructional and support resources that are superior to those of our institutions and other for-profit 

72

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.schools. Some of our competitors also have substantially greater name recognition and financial and other resources than we 
have, which may enable them to compete more effectively for potential students. These institutions are increasingly differenti-
ating themselves in the way that they deliver online course offerings, and we believe that in the future students seeking online 
instruction will be attracted to an institution in part because of the technology used by the institution to deliver instruction and 
other elements of the student experience. To compete for these students will require continued innovations and our people and 
technology platforms may not be capable of delivering competitive solutions that are desirable to students. In recent years, 
competing institutions and others have also started providing non-traditional, credit-bearing and non-credit-bearing education 
programs, including massively open online courses, or MOOCs, without charge or at low costs. We have also observed an 
increase in institutions offering competency-based programs, which permit students to learn at their own pace and progress in 
a program by demonstrating that they have achieved certain skills or knowledge rather than by earning credit hours, and ED has 
issued guidance addressing access to Title IV programs for students in these programs. We believe that our institutions will 
continue to face new competition from such programs, including competition from lower cost alternatives. Our institutions may 
not be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors and may face competitive pressures that could 
adversely affect their business or results of operations. These competitive factors could cause our institutions’ enrollments, 
revenues and profitability to decrease significantly.

Within the postsecondary education market generally, we anticipate increased competition. The total postsecondary student 
population has been declining. According to the National Student Clearinghouse, enrollment in Title IV postsecondary 
degree-granting institutions in the fall of 2014 decreased 1.3%, compared to fall 2013, with a decrease of 0.4% taking place 
among four-year for-profit schools. Longer term projections suggest that previous growth in enrollment in postsecondary 
degree-granting institutions is slowing. According to a February 2014 report from ED, such enrollment was projected to grow 14% 
over the 11-year period ending in fall of 2022, compared to 45% growth over the 14-year period that ended in the fall of 2011. The 
report also projects that enrollment in private postsecondary degree-granting institutions is projected to increase 14% for the 
11-year period ending in fall of 2022, compared to 78% growth over the 14-year period that ended in fall of 2011. The same report 
indicates that the number of high school graduates is projected to decrease 2% over the 13-year period ending in 2023 compared 
to 27% growth over the 12-year period that ended in 2010. The combination of reduced growth or declines in the postsecondary 
student population and increased capacity in the postsecondary education market will further intensify competition.

We also anticipate that APUS will continue to see increased competition within the military market, which continues to be a primary 
market for APUS, including from for-profit schools as those schools seek to attract students eligible for DoD tuition assistance pro-
grams, VA education benefits, or both, to comply with a regulatory requirement of ED known as the 90/10 Rule. This regulatory 
requirement is described more fully in “Regulatory Environment—Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements—
Department of Education—Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs—The “90/10 Rule.” Public and private not-for-profit 
institutions are also providing increased competition, including commitments to participate in the VA Yellow Ribbon Program through 
which such institutions agree to make additional financial aid funds available to veterans receiving Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.

Because APUS provides exclusively online education, it is dependent on continued growth and acceptance of 
exclusively online education and, if the recognition by students and employers of the value of online education 
does not continue to grow, its ability to grow could be adversely impacted.

We believe that continued growth in online education will be largely dependent on additional students and employers recogniz-
ing the value of degrees earned online. Increasingly, employers demand that, in addition to technical or substantive skills, their 
new employees possess appropriate “soft” skills, such as communication, critical thinking and teamwork skills, which can 
evolve rapidly in a changing economic and technological environment and may be, or may be perceived to be, more difficult to 
develop through online education. If students and employers are not convinced that online institutions are an acceptable 
alternative to traditional schools, or that an online education provides value, or if growth in the market penetration of online 

73

FORM 10-Keducation slows, growth in the industry and at APUS could be adversely affected. Because our business model for APUS is 
based on exclusively online education, if the acceptance of online education does not grow, our ability to grow APUS’s business 
and our financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

If our institutions are unable to update and expand the content of existing programs and develop new programs 
and specializations on a timely basis and in a cost-effective manner, our future growth may be impaired.

The updates and expansions of our institutions’ existing programs and the development of new programs and specializations 
may not be accepted by their accreditors, state regulators, ED, existing or prospective students or employers. If we cannot 
respond to changes in market requirements, our business may be adversely affected. Even if our institutions are able to develop 
acceptable new programs, they may not be able to introduce these new programs as quickly as students require or as quickly  
as competitors introduce competing programs. To offer a new academic program, our institutions may be required to obtain 
appropriate federal, state and accrediting agency approvals, which may be conditioned or delayed in a manner that could 
significantly affect our growth plans. If we are unable to respond adequately to changes in market requirements due to financial 
constraints, regulatory limitations, or other factors, our institutions’ ability to attract and retain students could be impaired and 
our financial results could suffer.

Establishing new academic programs or modifying or eliminating existing programs requires our institutions to make investments 
in management and capital expenditures, incur marketing expenses, and reallocate other resources. Our institutions may have 
limited experience providing courses in new fields of study and may need to modify systems and strategy or enter into arrange-
ments with other institutions to provide new programs effectively and profitably. If our institutions are unable to increase the 
number of students enrolling in new academic programs, offer programs in a cost-effective manner, or otherwise manage 
effectively the operations of those programs, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We intend to market APUS programs in international markets, which could subject us to a variety of risks not 
previously encountered and negatively impact our profitability and liquidity.

We intend to market APUS’s programs in international markets, which could subject us to a variety of risks not previously 
encountered and negatively impact our profitability and liquidity. We have marketed APUS’s programs to a limited number of 
international students in the past and we intend to increase these efforts in the future. APUS intends to market its programs 
using foreign representatives and other methods. We do not have previous experience marketing APUS’s programs through 
foreign representatives and we may be unable to adequately manage risks associated with these planned international efforts, 
which could adversely affect our ability to successfully attract, retain and serve students in international markets and nega-
tively impact our profitability and liquidity.

These international risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

•  uncertainty of acceptance of our offerings by students in international markets;

•  difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;

•  challenges finding, managing, and retaining foreign representative relationships;

•  compliance with foreign legal and regulatory requirements and unforeseen changes in such requirements;

• 

investment and execution missteps due to a failure to understand the local culture and market;

•  political and economic instability in the countries in which we market;

•  potentially adverse tax consequences; and

•  compliance with certain U.S. laws and regulations such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

74

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.If we are unable to pursue successfully HCON’s program initiatives and expansions, including opening new 
HCON campuses and increasing online education, our future growth may be impaired.

The success of the HCON acquisition will depend on our ability to maintain and increase student enrollments in HCON’s 
programs and to grow HCON’s on-campus and online program offerings. As part of our strategy, we intend to open new 
campuses for HCON. Such actions require us to obtain appropriate federal, state and accrediting agency approvals. In addition, 
adding new locations may require significant financial investments, human resource capabilities, and new clinical placement 
relationships. If we are unable to, or suffer any delay in our ability to, obtain appropriate approvals, attract additional students 
to new campus locations, offer programs at new campuses in a cost-effective manner, identify appropriate clinical placements, 
or otherwise manage effectively the operations of newly established campuses, our results of operations and financial condition 
could be adversely affected. As a result of the pending change in ownership application, at this time HCON cannot obtain ED’s 
approval to award Title IV program funds at new HCON locations.

Outside Ohio, other states’ regulatory bodies have regulations that apply to HCON programs. For example, a number of states 
may require that we obtain additional authorizations for HCON students enrolled in the online registered nurse to bachelor of 
science in nursing completion program to participate in practicum courses in those states, even where HCON has no other 
physical presence in the state. These types of provisions may make it more difficult to offer online education programs in those 
states. The inability to expand efficiently or successfully existing programs and pursue new program initiatives would harm our 
ability to grow the business and could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

If our institutions do not have adequate continued personal referrals and marketing and advertising programs 
that are effective in developing awareness among, attracting and retaining students, our financial performance 
in the future would suffer.

Building awareness of our institutions and the programs they offer among potential students is critical to our institutions’ ability 
to attract new students. In order to maintain and increase our revenues and profits, our institutions must continue to attract 
new students in a cost-effective manner, and these students must remain active in our institutions’ programs. In addition, 
because our institutions experience declines in their student population as a result of graduation, transfers to other academic 
institutions, military deployments and other reasons, in order to grow we need to first attract sufficient students to replace 
those that have left. Our marketing strategy for APUS has traditionally focused on building long-term, mutually beneficial 
relationships with organizations and individuals in the military and public safety communities. In recent years, APUS has 
supplemented its relationship-based marketing with multi-faceted interactive marketing campaigns to create a greater brand 
awareness, particularly of our APU brand outside the military and public safety communities, and to increase inquiries from 
potential students. Similarly, HCON’s marketing strategy has focused on building long-term relationships with businesses, 
organizations and individuals in the healthcare community, primarily in Ohio, where HCON’s campuses are located. In addition, 
HCON utilizes traditional media as well as internet-focused marketing channels, including organic search, local display advertis-
ing and pay-per-click.

Some of the factors that could prevent us from successfully advertising and marketing our institutions’ programs and from 
successfully enrolling and retaining students in those programs include, but are not limited to:

•  the emergence of more, and more successful, competitors;

•  factors related to our institutions’ marketing, including the costs of internet advertising and multi-faceted interactive 

marketing campaigns;

•  challenges in designing marketing campaigns that successfully attract college-ready students;

75

FORM 10-K• 

limits on our ability to attract and retain effective employees because of the incentive payment rule, as described more fully 
below in “Risks Related to the Regulation of our Industry”;

•  performance problems with our institutions’ online systems;

•  our institutions’ failure to maintain accreditation, state authorization, eligibility for Title IV programs, or other approvals;

• 

increased regulation of online education, including in states in which we do not have a physical presence;

•  regulatory investigations or litigation that may damage our reputation;

•  student dissatisfaction with our institutions’ services and programs;

•  failure to develop a message or image for APUS that resonates well with non-military students;

•  a dilution of our brand as a result of the HCON acquisition or other expansion;

•  adverse publicity regarding us, our institutions, our competitors, or online or for-profit education generally;

•  adverse developments in APUS’s relationships with military officers and other leaders in the military community;

• 

inability to integrate the HCON acquisition in an efficient and timely manner;

•  a decline in the acceptance of online education generally; and

•  a decrease in the perceived or actual economic benefits that students derive from our institutions’ programs or programs 

provided by for-profit schools generally.

To continue to grow and diversify the student body of APUS, we will need to identify marketing channels that support that 
growth and diversification while also attracting students who perform well at APUS upon enrollment. However, because our 
tuition is generally lower than that of most of our competitors, we have fewer dollars available to spend on marketing and 
advertising than they do. As a result, we may decide to implement new marketing tactics and channels with which we have no 
experience and no guarantee of success. Accordingly, we may find it increasingly difficult to continue to compete and grow and 
diversify our enrollments at APUS. If we are unable to continue to develop awareness of our institutions and the programs we 
offer, and to enroll and retain students in military and non-military markets, our enrollments would suffer and our ability to 
increase revenues and maintain profitability would be significantly impaired.

The success of the HCON acquisition depends, in part, on our ability to maintain and increase student enrollments in HCON’s 
programs. Prior to the HCON acquisition, we had no experience with attracting new students to and retaining students in 
educational programs offered primarily on physical campuses. If we are unable to retain HCON’s marketing personnel and to 
develop our expertise in marketing such programs, we may not be able to successfully execute our long-term strategic plan to 
diversify our business and expand our programs, which would negatively affect our operating results.

System disruptions and security breaches to our online computer networks, technology infrastructure, or 
online classroom infrastructure, or to the networks, infrastructures and systems of third parties, could 
negatively impact our ability to generate revenue and could damage our reputation, limiting our ability to 
attract and retain students.

The performance and reliability of our and our institutions’ networks and technology infrastructure, including those of third-
party systems we use, is critical to our institutions’ reputation and ability to attract and retain students. Any system error or 
failure, or a sudden and significant increase in bandwidth usage, could interrupt our or our institutions’ ability to operate and 
could result in the unavailability of our institutions’ online classrooms (which is particularly relevant to APUS), preventing 
students from accessing their courses and adversely affecting our results of operations.

76

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Our systems at APUS, particularly those proprietary information systems and processes that we refer to as Partnership At a 
Distance™, or PAD, have been predominantly developed in-house, with limited support from outside vendors. To the extent that 
we have utilized third-party vendors to provide certain software products for our systems, we have generally needed to 
integrate those products into, and ensure that they function with, PAD. We continuously work on upgrades to PAD, and our 
employees devote substantial time to its development, and to the successful integration of third-party products into PAD. To the 
extent that we face system disruptions or malfunctions with PAD, we may not have the capacity to address such disruptions or 
malfunctions with our internal resources, and we may not be able to identify outside contractors with expertise relevant to our 
custom system.

Our institutions’ technology infrastructure, and the technology infrastructure of our third-party vendors, could be vulnerable to 
interruption or malfunction due to events beyond our control, including natural disasters, cyber attacks, hacker or terrorist 
activities, and telecommunications failures. Our computer networks, and the networks of our third-party vendors, may also be 
vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer hackers, computer viruses and other security problems. A user who circumvents 
security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or personal information about our students or employees, or 
could cause interruptions or malfunctions in operations. If we or third parties with access to our systems, or to our proprietary 
information or personal information about our students or employees, experience security breaches in the future, we may be 
required to expend significant resources to protect against the threat of these security breaches or to alleviate problems caused 
by such breaches, which could include litigation from our students or employees or the impositions of penalties.

We engage multiple security assessment providers on a periodic basis to review and assess our security. We utilize this informa-
tion to audit ourselves to ensure that we are adequately monitoring the security of our technology infrastructure. However, we 
cannot assure you that these security assessments and audits will protect our computer networks against the threat of security 
breaches. Similarly, although we require our third-party vendors to maintain a level of security that is acceptable to us and work 
closely with our third-party vendors to address potential and actual security concerns and attacks, we cannot assure you that we 
and our systems and proprietary information or personal information about our students or employees will be protected against 
the threat of security attacks on our third-party vendors that affect our systems or such information. System disruptions and 
security breaches to our online computer networks, technology infrastructure, or online classroom infrastructure, or to the 
networks, infrastructures and systems of third parties could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

The personal information that we collect may be vulnerable to breach, theft or loss that could adversely affect 
our reputation and operations.

Possession and use of personal information in our institutions’ operations subjects us to risks and costs that could harm our 
business. Our institutions may collect, use, and retain large amounts of personal information regarding our students and their 
families, including social security numbers, tax return information, personal and family financial data, bank account information, 
and credit card numbers. Our institutions also collect and maintain personal information of employees in the ordinary course of 
our business. Some of this personal information is held and managed by certain third-party vendors, including our third-party 
servicers and IT vendors. Although our institutions use security and business controls to limit access and use of personal 
information, a third party may be able to circumvent those security and business controls, which could result in a breach of 
student or employee privacy. In addition, errors in the storage, use or transmission of personal information could result in a 
breach of student or employee privacy. Possession and use of personal information in our institutions’ operations also subjects 
us to legislative and regulatory burdens that could restrict the use of personal information and require notification of data 
breaches. We cannot guarantee that a breach, loss or theft of personal information will not occur. A violation of any laws or 
regulations relating to the collection or use of personal information could result in the imposition of fines or lawsuits against us 
or our institutions. As a result, we may be required to expend significant resources to protect against the threat of these 
security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches. A breach, theft, or loss of personal information regarding 

77

FORM 10-Kour institutions’ students and their families or our institutions’ employees that is held by our institutions or third-party vendors 
could have a material adverse effect on our institutions’ reputations and results of operations and result in liability under 
foreign, state and federal privacy statutes and legal actions by state attorneys general and private litigants, any of which could 
divert management’s attention and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and 
cash flows.

We face an ever increasing number of threats to our computer systems, including unauthorized activity and access, malicious 
penetration, system viruses, malicious code and organized cyber-attacks, which could breach our security and disrupt our 
systems. These risks increase when we make changes to our IT systems or implement new ones. Our size makes us a prominent 
target for hacking and other cyber attacks within the education industry. From time to time we experience security events and 
incidents, and these reflect an increasing level of malicious sophistication, organization and innovation. We have devoted and 
will continue to devote significant resources to the security of our computer systems, but they may still be vulnerable to these 
threats. A user who circumvents security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions or 
malfunctions in operations, perhaps over an extended period of time prior to detection. As a result, we may be required to 
expend significant additional resources to protect against the threat of or alleviate problems caused by these system disruptions 
and security breaches. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. 
Although we maintain insurance in respect of these types of events, there is no assurance that available insurance proceeds 
would be adequate to compensate us for damages sustained due to these events.

Failure to comply with privacy laws or regulations could have an adverse effect on our business.

Various federal, state and international laws and regulations govern the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of 
consumer data. This area of the law is evolving, and interpretations of applicable laws and regulations differ. Legislative activity 
in the privacy area may result in new laws that are relevant to us and the operations of our institutions, for example, use of 
consumer data for marketing or advertising. Claims of failure to comply with our institutions’ privacy policies or applicable laws 
or regulations could form the basis of governmental or private-party actions against us. Such claims and actions may cause 
damage to our institutions’ reputation and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Any significant interruption in the operation of data centers hosting our institutions’ technology infrastructure 
could cause a loss of data and disrupt the ability to manage our institutions’ technology infrastructure.

Any significant interruption in the operation of our institutions’ data centers or server rooms could cause a loss of data and 
disrupt the ability to manage network hardware and software and technological infrastructure. Even with redundancy, a 
significant interruption in the operation of these facilities or the loss of institutional and operational data due to a natural 
disaster, fire, power interruption, act of terrorism or other unanticipated catastrophic event may not be preventable. Any 
significant interruption in the operation of these facilities, including an interruption caused by the failure to successfully expand 
or upgrade systems or manage transitions and implementations, could reduce the ability to manage network and technological 
infrastructure, which could adversely affect our institutions’ operations and reputations. Additionally, our institutions do not 
necessarily control the operation of the facilities hosting our technology infrastructure and may be required to rely on other 
parties to provide physical security, facilities management and communications infrastructure services. If any third-party 
vendors encounter financial difficulty such as bankruptcy or other events beyond our control that causes them to fail to secure 
adequately and maintain their facilities or provide necessary data communications capacity, our institutions’ students may 
experience interruptions in service or the loss or theft of important data, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

78

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Government regulations relating to the internet could increase our cost of doing business and affect our  
ability to grow.

Government regulations relating to the internet could increase our cost of doing business and affect our ability to grow. The 
increasing reliance on and use of the internet and other online services has led and may continue to lead to the adoption of new 
laws and regulatory practices in the United States or foreign countries and to new interpretations of existing laws and regula-
tions. These new laws and interpretations may relate to issues such as online privacy, internet neutrality, copyrights, trade-
marks and service marks, sales taxes, fair business practices, and the requirement that online education institutions qualify to 
do business as foreign corporations or be licensed in one or more jurisdictions where they have no physical location. New laws, 
regulations or interpretations related to doing business over the internet could increase our costs of compliance or doing 
business and materially affect our institutions’ ability to offer online courses, which would have a material effect on our 
business and financial condition.

Risks Related to the Regulation of Our Industry

If we or our institutions fail to comply with the extensive regulatory requirements for the operation of 
postsecondary education institutions, we and our institutions could face penalties and significant restrictions on 
operations, including loss of access to DoD tuition assistance programs and federal student loans and grants.

We and our institutions are subject to extensive regulation by (1) accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of 
Education, (2) state regulatory bodies, and (3) the federal government, through ED. Because APUS participates in DoD tuition 
assistance and VA education benefits programs administered by DoD and the VA, respectively, and HCON participates in VA 
benefit programs, they are also subject to oversight by those agencies. The regulations, standards, and policies of these 
organizations cover the vast majority of our institutions’ operations, including their educational programs, facilities, instructional 
and administrative staff, administrative procedures, marketing, recruiting, financial operations, and financial condition. These 
regulatory requirements can also affect the ability to acquire new institutions, to open new locations, to add new or expand 
existing educational programs, to change our corporate structure or ownership, and to make other substantive changes. These 
requirements can also increase our cost of operations.

Findings of noncompliance with these laws, regulations, standards, and policies could result in any of the relevant regulatory 
agencies taking action including: imposing monetary fines, penalties, or injunctions; limiting operations, including restricting our 
institutions’ ability to offer new programs of study or to open new locations, or imposing limits on our growth; limiting or 
terminating our ability to grant degrees; restricting or revoking our institutions’ accreditation, licensure, or other approval to 
operate; limiting, suspending, or terminating our institutions’ eligibility to participate in Title IV, DoD tuition assistance, or other 
financial aid programs by requiring us to repay funds, post a letter of credit, become subject to payment methods for Title IV 
programs that are not the advance payment system; subjecting us to civil or criminal penalties; or other actions that could have 
a material adverse effect on our business.

The regulations, standards, and policies of ED, state regulatory bodies, and our institutions’ accrediting agencies change 
frequently and are subject to interpretive ambiguities, particularly where they are written for institutions that offer on-campus 
instruction, such as HCON, rather than online institutions, such as APUS. Recent and pending changes in, or new interpretations 
of, applicable laws, regulations, standards, or policies, or our noncompliance with any applicable laws, regulations, standards, or 
policies, could have a material adverse effect on our accreditation, authorization to operate in various states, permissible 
activities, receipt of funds under DoD tuition assistance programs, our ability to participate in Title IV programs, our ability to 
participate in VA education benefit programs, or costs of doing business. We cannot predict with certainty how all of these 
regulatory requirements will be applied or whether we will be able to comply, or will be deemed by others to have complied, 

79

FORM 10-Kwith all of the requirements. In the section entitled “Regulatory Environment” of this Annual Report and these Risk Factors,  
we have described some of the more significant risks related to the ability of our institutions to comply with the regulations, 
standards, and policies of ED, state regulatory bodies, and our accrediting agencies.

In addition, in some circumstances of noncompliance or alleged noncompliance, we may be subject to “qui tam” lawsuits under 
the Federal False Claims Act or various, similar, state false claim statutes, and various “whistleblower” statutes. In Federal False 
Claims Act actions, private plaintiffs seek to enforce remedies under the Federal False Claims Act on behalf of the U.S. and, if 
successful, are entitled to recover their costs and to receive a portion of any amounts recovered by the U.S. in the lawsuit. A 
similar process applies to state false claim statutes. These lawsuits can be prosecuted by a private plaintiff in respect of some 
action taken by us, even if ED or another regulatory body does not agree with plaintiff’s theory of liability, or the government 
can intervene and become a party to the lawsuit. Qui tam lawsuits have the potential to generate very significant damages 
linked to our receipt of Title IV funding.

If our institutions fail to maintain their institutional accreditation, they would lose the ability to participate in 
DoD tuition assistance programs and also to participate in Title IV programs.

As described more fully above in each operating segment’s section on “Business—Company Overview—Accreditation” and 
“Regulatory Environment—Accreditation,” each of our institutions is accredited by an institutional accrediting agency recog-
nized by the Secretary of Education. Accreditation by an accrediting agency that is recognized by the Secretary of Education is 
required for participation in DoD tuition assistance programs and for an institution to become and remain eligible to participate 
in Title IV programs. APUS participates in DoD tuition assistance programs and Title IV programs, and HCON participates in  
Title IV programs.

Our institutions’ accrediting agencies may impose restrictions on their accreditation or may terminate their accreditation. To 
remain accredited, our institutions must continuously meet certain criteria and standards relating to, among other things, 
performance, governance, institutional integrity, educational quality, faculty, administrative capability, resources, and financial 
stability. Failure to meet any of these criteria or standards could result in the loss of accreditation at the discretion of the 
accrediting agencies. The complete loss of accreditation would, among other things, render our institutions’ and their students 
ineligible to participate in DoD tuition assistance programs or Title IV programs, and have a material adverse effect on our 
enrollments, revenues, and results of operations.

Our institutions’ student enrollments could decline if they fail to maintain accreditation.

Institutional accreditation is an important attribute of our institutions. Colleges and universities depend, in part, on accreditation 
in evaluating transfers of credit and applications to graduate schools; some institutions will accept transfer credit only from 
regionally accredited institutions. Employers rely on the accredited status of institutions when evaluating a candidate’s creden-
tials, and students, corporations, and government sponsors under tuition reimbursement programs look to accreditation for 
assurance that an institution maintains quality educational standards. Failure to maintain our institutional accreditation would 
have a material adverse effect on our enrollments, revenues, and results of operations. In addition, certain of our individual 
programs are accredited by specialized accrediting agencies, or recognized by professional organizations. If we fail to satisfy the 
standards of these specialized accrediting agencies and professional organizations, we could lose the specialized accreditation 
or professional recognition for the affected programs, which could result in materially reduced student enrollments in those 
programs and have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, in certain cases, professional licensure will not be granted if an 
applicant for licensure earned the relevant educational credential from an institution or educational program that lacks regional 
or specialized accreditation. Failure to obtain or maintain specialized accreditation or professional recognition for certain 
programs could result in materially reduced student enrollments in affected programs and have a material adverse effect on us.

80

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Increased scrutiny of accrediting agencies by the Secretary of Education and the U.S. Congress may result  
in increased scrutiny of institutions, particularly for-profit institutions, by accrediting agencies, and if the 
accrediting agency of one of our institutions would lose its ability to serve as an accrediting agency for  
Title IV program purposes, that institution may lose its ability to participate in Title IV programs.

APUS is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, or HLC. In December 2009, the ED Office of the Inspector General, or 
OIG, recommended that ED consider limiting, suspending, or terminating HLC’s recognition as an accreditor for purposes of 
determining institutional eligibility to participate in Title IV programs. HLC received additional scrutiny in June 2010 during a 
House Education and Labor Committee hearing focused on OIG’s findings with regard to credit hour policies. Increased scrutiny 
of accrediting agencies by the Secretary of Education and Congress in connection with ED’s recognition process may result in 
increased scrutiny of institutions by accrediting agencies.

In December 2010, the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, or NACIQI, the panel charged with 
advising ED on whether to recognize accrediting agencies for Title IV purposes, reviewed HLC’s status as a recognized accredit-
ing agency. At that time, NACIQI voted to continue HLC’s recognition as an accrediting agency but also ordered the agency to 
submit an additional compliance report in one year. At its December 2011 meeting, NACIQI characterized HLC’s report as 
“informational” and noted that no vote was to be taken on it. In June 2013, NACIQI voted to recommend continuation of HLC’s 
recognition as an accrediting agency until it reaches a final decision on whether to re-recognize HLC. Although NACIQI was next 
scheduled to review HLC for recognition purposes in the spring of 2014, HLC was not on the June 2014 or December 2014 
NACIQI meeting agendas. We cannot predict the outcome of NACIQI’s review of HLC’s recognition.

HCON is accredited by the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools, or ACICS. In June 2011, NACIQI reviewed 
ACICS’s status as a recognized accrediting agency. At that time, NACIQI voted to continue ACICS’s recognition as an accrediting 
agency but also ordered the agency to bring itself into compliance and submit within one year a report demonstrating its efforts 
to address concerns related to, among other things, the agency’s experience in accrediting doctoral programs, the composition 
of its review teams and decision-making bodies, access to institutional files, and review and monitoring of student achievement, 
and reporting of the results to the institution. In June 2013, upon review of the compliance report submitted by ACICS, NACIQI 
voted to renew ACICS’s recognition for a period of three years.

If ED ceased to recognize one of our institutional accrediting agencies for any reason, the institution accredited by that agency 
would not be eligible to participate in Title IV programs unless the institution was accredited by another accrediting agency 
recognized by ED, or ED continued to certify the eligibility of the institution to participate in Title IV programs. ED may continue to 
certify an institution for a period no longer than 18 months after the date such recognition ceased. The ineligibility of our institu-
tions to participate in Title IV programs would have a material adverse effect on enrollments, revenues, and results of operations.

National or regional accreditation agencies may prescribe more rigorous accreditation standards for our 
institutions, which could have a material adverse effect on our student enrollment, revenues and cash flows.

The accreditation standards of the national or regional accreditation agencies that accredit our institutions can and do vary, and 
the accreditation agencies may prescribe more rigorous standards than are currently in place. Complying with more rigorous 
accreditation standards could require significant changes to the way we operate our business and increase our administrative 
and other costs. No assurances can be given that our institutions would be able to comply with more rigorous accreditation 
standards in a timely manner or at all. If one of our institutions does not meet its accreditation requirements, its accreditation 
could be limited, modified, suspended, or terminated. Failure to maintain accreditation would make such institution ineligible to 
participate in DoD tuition assistance and Title IV programs, which could have a material adverse effect on the institution’s 
student enrollment and revenues.

81

FORM 10-KBecause of rapid growth in, and increased scrutiny of, the for-profit education sector, accrediting bodies may adopt new or 
revised criteria, standards, and policies that are intended to monitor, regulate, or limit the growth of for-profit institutions like 
ours. For example, in June 2009, HLC adopted new policies related to institutional control, structure, and organization. The 
policies extend HLC’s oversight to transactions that change, or have the potential to change, the control of an institution or its 
fundamental structure and organization. Under the policies, HLC also now extends its oversight to defined changes that occur in 
a parent or controlling entity, and not necessarily in the institution itself. Actions by, or relating to, an accredited institution, 
including a significant acquisition of another institution, significant changes in board composition or organizational documents, 
and accumulations by one stockholder of greater than 25% of the capital stock, could result in additional reviews by HLC and 
possible change from an accredited status to candidate status, which enhances the risks associated with these types of 
actions. In particular, the change from accredited status to candidate status could adversely impact an institution’s ability to 
participate in Title IV programs. For-profit institutions may also be less attractive acquisition candidates because HLC has 
enhanced its scrutiny of change in control transactions, obtained the explicit ability to move an institution from accredited 
status to candidate status, and will be examining more closely entities that own accredited institutions.

Beginning in 2012, ACICS, HCON’s accreditor, established compliance standards to measure student retention, graduate 
placement and licensure passage rates. In the event that a campus or program offered by a campus fails to meet the minimum 
compliance standard for two consecutive years after notice from ACICS and does not satisfy the requirement for a waiver, 
ACICS may withdraw accreditation from the campus or program. The compliance standards for retention and graduate place-
ment increased substantially from 2012 to 2013. If one of the HCON campuses fails to meet the compliance standards for either 
student retention or graduate placement enrollment in such HCON campuses, programs could decline, which could have a 
material adverse impact on HCON’s student enrollment, revenues and cash flows.

If our institutions fail to maintain state authorization in the states where they are physically located, the  
institutions would lose their ability to grant degrees and other credentials in that state and to participate  
in Title IV programs.

As discussed in the “Regulatory Environment—State Licensure/Authorization” section of this Annual Report, to participate in 
Title IV programs, an institution must be legally authorized by the relevant education agency of the state in which it is physically 
located. Loss of state authorization by one of our institutions in the state in which it is physically located would cause that 
institution to be ineligible to participate in Title IV programs and to lose its ability to grant credentials.

APUS is physically headquartered in the State of West Virginia and is currently authorized to offer its programs by the West 
Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission, or WVHEPC, the regulatory agency governing postsecondary education in the 
State of West Virginia. Such authorization may be lost, limited or withdrawn if APUS fails to comply with material require-
ments under West Virginia statutes and rules for continued authorization. Under current law, if APUS were to lose its 
regional accreditation by HLC, WVHEPC may suspend, withdraw, or revoke APUS’s authorization. In addition, in order to 
maintain our eligibility for accreditation by HLC, we must remain headquartered and have a substantial presence in one of 
the states in its region, which includes West Virginia. Thus, if APUS were to lose its authorization from WVHEPC, APUS 
would be unable to provide educational services in West Virginia, we would lose our eligibility for Title IV programs, and 
APUS would lose its HLC accreditation.

HCON is located in the State of Ohio and is authorized by the Ohio State Board of Career Colleges and Schools and the Ohio 
Board of Regents. Such authorization may be limited, suspended, or revoked if HCON fails to submit renewal applications or 
other required submissions to the state in a timely manner, or if HCON fails to comply with material requirements under 
applicable Ohio statutes and rules for continued authorization. Continued state authorization is required in order to maintain 
ACICS accreditation. If HCON were to lose its authorization from the Ohio State Board of Career Colleges and Schools, HCON 

82

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.would be unable to provide educational services in Ohio, HCON would lose its eligibility for Title IV programs, and HCON would 
lose its accreditation. If HCON were to lose its authorization from the Ohio Board of Regents, HCON would be unable to offer 
the online registered nurse to bachelor of science in nursing completion program in Ohio. If HCON were to lose approval from 
the Ohio Board of Nursing for the Diploma in Practical Nursing or the Associate Degree in Nursing, students in the program 
lacking approval would not be eligible to apply for licensure by examination to practice nursing in Ohio.

Effective July 1, 2011, ED regulations provide that a proprietary institution is considered legally authorized by a state if the state 
has a process to review and appropriately act on complaints concerning the institution, including enforcing applicable state 
laws, and the institution complies with any applicable state approval or licensure requirements consistent with the new rules.  
If a state in which one of our institutions is located fails to comply in the future with the provisions of that regulation, our 
institutions’ ability to operate in that state and to participate in Title IV programs could be limited or terminated. For additional 
information on these regulations please refer to the “Regulatory Environment—ED’s State Licensure/Authorization Regulatory 
Requirements” section of this Annual Report.

Our institutions’ failure to comply with regulations of various states could result in actions taken by those states 
that would have a material adverse effect on our enrollments, revenues, and results of operations.

Various states impose regulatory requirements on educational institutions operating within their boundaries. Many states 
assert jurisdiction over online educational institutions that have no physical location or other presence in the state but offer 
educational services to students who reside in the state or advertise to or recruit prospective students in the state. State 
regulatory requirements for online education are inconsistent among states and not well developed in many jurisdictions. As 
such, these requirements change frequently and, in some instances, are not clear or are left to the discretion of state regulators.

For information about those jurisdictions in which APUS and HCON are authorized, see “Regulatory Environment—State 
Licensure/Authorization” in this Annual Report. To the extent that we have obtained, or obtain in the future, additional authori-
zations or licensure, changes in state laws and regulations and the interpretation of those laws and regulations by the applica-
ble regulators may limit our ability to offer educational programs and award degrees. Some states may also prescribe financial 
regulations that are different from those of ED. If we fail to comply with state licensing or authorization requirements, we may 
be subject to the loss of state licensure or authorization. If we fail to comply with state requirements to obtain licensure or 
authorization, we may be the subject of injunctive actions or penalties.

As described in “Regulatory Environment—State Licensure/Authorization” in this Annual Report, ED’s Program Integrity 
Regulations provided that if an institution offered postsecondary education through distance education to students in a state, it 
was required to obtain any necessary approvals to do so. However, on July 12, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of 
Columbia upheld ED’s power to promulgate regulations on state authorization for distance education but vacated on procedural 
grounds those provisions of the Program Integrity Regulations, and on June 5, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of 
Columbia affirmed the district court’s ruling. In November 2013, ED announced its intent to establish a negotiated rulemaking 
panel to consider regulations for, among other issues, state authorization of programs offered through distance education. 
Negotiated rulemaking sessions occurred in the winter and spring of 2014, but the negotiating committee did not reach consen-
sus. In June 2014, ED announced that it would delay the release of proposed rules regarding state authorization for distance 
education. No assurance can be given with respect to whether ED will adopt new rules on state authorization for distance 
education or, in the event that such regulations are adopted, our ability to comply with the new regulations. Should ED adopt 
new rules addressing licensing requirements for distance education, and if one of our institutions fails to obtain or maintain 
required state authorization to provide postsecondary distance education in a specific state, the institution could lose its ability 
to award Title IV aid to students in that state.

83

FORM 10-KThe inability of our institutions’ graduates to obtain professional licensure, employment or other outcomes in 
their chosen fields of study could reduce our enrollments and revenues, and potentially lead to litigation that 
could be costly to us.

Certain of our institutions’ graduates seek professional licensure, employment or other outcomes in their chosen fields following 
graduation. Their success in obtaining these outcomes depends on several factors, including, for example, the individual merits 
of the graduate; whether the institution and the program were approved by the state in which the graduate seeks licensure, or 
by a professional association; whether the program from which the student graduated meets all state requirements for profes-
sional licensure; and whether the institution or program has any required accreditation. Certain states have refused to license or 
certify students from particular APUS programs on grounds that the program did not meet one or more of the state’s specific 
licensure requirements or was not approved by the state for purposes of professional licensure. Based on challenges related to 
satisfying varying state rules regarding eligibility for teacher licensure in a state, APUS determined not to enroll new students in 
any of its initial teacher licensure programs as of December 2014.

To apply for licensure to practice nursing in Ohio, an applicant must have successfully completed a nursing education program 
that is approved by the Ohio Board of Nursing. Regulations of the Ohio Board of Nursing, which approves the HCON Practical 
Nurse, or PN program, and Associates Degree in Nursing, or ADN programs, require that a nursing education program such as 
the HCON PN and ADN programs must have a pass rate on the relevant NCLEX licensure exam that is at least ninety-five 
percent of the national average for first-time candidates in a calendar year. If a program does not attain such pass rate, the 
program may face sanctions, including, after four consecutive years of failing to meet that standard, placement on provisional 
approval status. If a program on provisional approval continues to fail to meet the requirements of the Ohio Board of Nursing, 
the Ohio Board of Nursing may withdraw its approval of the program.

The state requirements for licensure are subject to change, as are the professional certification standards, and we may not 
become aware of changes that may impact our students in certain instances. In addition, requirements for employment vary 
from employer to employer and from field to field. In the event that one or more states refuses to recognize our institutions’ 
students for professional licensure based on factors relating to our institutions or programs, the potential growth of our 
institutions’ programs would be negatively impacted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial 
condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, to the extent our graduates fail to satisfy requirements for employment 
by particular employers or in a particular profession based on characteristics of their program, the potential growth of our 
institutions’ programs would be negatively impacted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial 
condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, we and our institutions could be exposed to litigation that would 
force us to incur legal and other expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results 
of operations and cash flows.

Our institutions must periodically seek recertification to participate in Title IV programs, and may, in certain 
circumstances, be subject to review by the Department of Education prior to seeking recertification, and our 
future success may be adversely affected if our institutions are unable to successfully maintain certification or 
obtain recertification.

An institution generally must seek recertification from ED at least every six years and possibly more frequently depending on 
various factors, such as whether it is provisionally certified. ED may also review an institution’s continued eligibility and 
certification to participate in Title IV programs, or scope of eligibility and certification, in the event the institution undergoes a 
change in ownership resulting in a change of control, or expands its activities in certain ways, such as the addition of certain 
types of new programs, addition of new locations, or, in certain cases, changes to the academic credentials that it offers. In 

84

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.certain circumstances, ED must provisionally certify an institution, such as when it is an initial participant in Title IV programs, 
or has undergone a change in ownership and control.

A provisionally certified institution must apply for and receive ED approval of substantial changes and must comply with any 
additional conditions included in its program participation agreement. If ED determines that a provisionally certified institution is 
unable to meet its responsibilities under its program participation agreement, it may seek to revoke the institution’s certification 
to participate in Title IV programs with fewer due process protections for the institution than if it were fully certified.

APUS is fully recertified to participate in Title IV programs through September 30, 2020. APUS will be required to apply timely 
for recertification in order to continue to participate in the Title IV programs after September 30, 2020. HCON was deemed to 
have undergone a change of ownership and control in November 2013, requiring review by ED in order to reestablish eligibility 
and continue participation in Title IV programs. As described more fully in “Regulatory Environment—Student Financing Sources 
and Related Regulations/Requirements—Regulatory Actions and Restrictions on Operations—Change in Ownership Resulting 
in a Change of Control,” ED has granted HCON temporary provisional certification on a month-to-month basis until ED makes a 
determination on HCON’s application for approval of the change of ownership and control. ED has requested various pieces of 
supplemental information which is more fully described in the applicable section of the “Business—Regulatory Environment” 
section of this Annual Report. Until that determination, HCON operates under a Temporary Provisional Program Participation 
Agreement, or TPPPA. HCON must comply with specific conditions while it is provisionally certified. If ED approves an applica-
tion after a change in ownership and control, it will issue a provisional certification extending for a period expiring not later than 
the end of the third complete award year following the date of provisional certification.

If ED were to withdraw or not renew our institutions’ certification to participate in Title IV programs, our students would no 
longer be able to receive Title IV program funds, which would have a material adverse effect on our enrollments, revenues, and 
results of operations. Our students would also no longer be able to use DoD tuition assistance to pay for our programs because 
the DoD MOU requires an institution to participate in the Title IV programs in order to be able to participate in the DoD tuition 
assistance program. Loss of participation in the DoD tuition assistance program would have a material adverse effect on our 
enrollments, revenues and results of operations.

A failure to demonstrate “administrative capability” may result in the loss of eligibility to participate in  
Title IV programs.

ED regulations specify extensive criteria an institution must satisfy to establish that it has the requisite “administrative 
capability” to participate in Title IV programs and the sanctions ED may impose if an institution fails to satisfy any of those 
criteria. To meet the administrative capability standards, an institution must, among other things, comply with all applicable 
Title IV requirements, including with respect to the administration of Title IV programs and the processing of Title IV program 
funds. See “Regulatory Environment—Federal Support and Regulation of Postsecondary Education—Regulation of Title IV 
Financial Aid Programs—Administrative Capability.” If an institution fails to satisfy any of the administrative capability require-
ments, ED may require the repayment of federal student financial aid funds, transfer the institution from the “advance” system 
of payment of Title IV program funds to cash monitoring status, or to the “reimbursement” method of payment, place the 
institution on provisional certification status, or commence a proceeding to impose a fine or to limit, suspend, or terminate the 
participation of the institution in Title IV programs.

If one of our institutions is found not to have satisfied ED’s “administrative capability” requirements, it could be limited in its 
access to, or lose, Title IV program funding, which would limit our potential for growth and adversely affect our enrollment, 
revenues, and results of operations.

85

FORM 10-KA failure to demonstrate “financial responsibility” may result in the loss of eligibility by one of our institutions to 
participate in Title IV programs or require the posting of a letter of credit in order to maintain eligibility to 
participate in Title IV programs.

To participate in Title IV programs, an eligible institution must satisfy specific measures of financial responsibility prescribed by 
ED, or post a letter of credit in favor of ED and possibly accept other conditions, such as provisional certification, additional 
reporting requirements, or regulatory oversight of its participation in Title IV programs. ED may also apply such measures of 
financial responsibility to a parent company of an eligible institution and, if such measures are not satisfied by the parent 
company, require the institution to post a letter of credit in favor of ED, and possibly accept other conditions on its participation 
in Title IV programs. An obligation to post a letter of credit, or to accept other conditions, such as a change in our system of Title 
IV payment from ED for purposes of disbursement, could increase our costs of regulatory compliance, or affect our cash flow. If 
one of our institutions is found not to have satisfied ED’s “financial responsibility” requirements, it could be limited in its access 
to, or lose, Title IV program funds, which would limit our potential for growth and adversely affect our enrollment, revenues, and 
results of operations. If we, as the parent company of an eligible institution, are found not to have satisfied ED’s financial 
responsibility requirements, all of our institutions could be limited in their access to, or lose, Title IV program funds.

If our institutions do not comply with the 90/10 Rule, they will lose eligibility to participate in federal student 
financial aid programs.

A provision of the HEA requires all proprietary education institutions to comply with what is commonly referred to as the 90/10 
Rule, which imposes sanctions on participating institutions that derive more than 90% of their total revenue on a cash account-
ing basis from Title IV programs as calculated under the regulations. For more information including the 90/10 calculations for 
our institutions, see “Regulatory Environment—Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements—
Department of Education—Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs—The 90/10 Rule.”

The 90/10 Rule percentage for our institutions could increase in the future, depending on the impact of future changes in our 
enrollment mix, and regulatory and other factors outside our control, including any reduction in tuition assistance provided by 
the DoD for service members and education benefits provided by the VA for veterans, or changes in the treatment of such 
funding for purposes of the 90/10 Rule calculation. Currently, DoD tuition assistance and VA education benefits are not treated 
as Title IV revenue under the 90/10 Rule and, therefore, for APUS, a majority of such funding is included in the “10%” portion of 
the rule calculation. A reduction in the availability of this type of funding, or a change (through legislation, regulatory action or 
an executive order) that requires that those funds be treated in the same manner as Title IV funding under the 90/10 Rule, would 
increase our 90/10 Rule percentage. If any of our institutions violates the 90/10 Rule and loses eligibility to participate in Title IV 
programs, its ineligibility to participate in Title IV programs would have a material adverse effect on our enrollments, revenues, 
results of operations and cash flows.

Our institutions’ failure to comply with the Department of Education’s incentive payment rule could result  
in sanctions.

If one of our institutions pays a bonus, commission, or other incentive payment in violation of applicable ED rules, that institu-
tion could be subject to sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As described in “Regulatory 
Environment—Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements—Department of Education—Regulation of 
Title IV Financial Aid Programs—Incentive Payment Rule,” abolition of regulatory safe harbors that described permissible 
arrangements, and other recent changes in the regulation, may create uncertainty about what constitutes impermissible 
incentive payments. The modified incentive payment rule and related uncertainty as to how it will be interpreted also may 
influence our approach, or limit our alternatives, with respect to employment policies and practices and consequently may affect 

86

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.negatively our ability to recruit and retain employees, and, as a result, our business could be materially and adversely affected. 
In addition, the Government Accountability Office, or GAO, has issued a report critical of ED’s enforcement of the incentive 
payment rule, and ED has undertaken to increase its enforcement efforts.

If ED determines that one of our institutions violated the incentive payment rule, it may require the institution to modify its 
payment arrangements to ED’s satisfaction. ED may also fine the institution or initiate action to limit, suspend, or terminate the 
institution’s participation in Title IV programs. ED may also seek to recover Title IV funds disbursed in connection with the 
prohibited incentive payments. In addition, third parties may file “qui tam” or “whistleblower” suits on behalf of ED alleging 
violation of the incentive payment provision. Such suits may prompt ED investigations, and the government may determine to 
intervene in the lawsuits. Particularly in light of the uncertainty surrounding the modified incentive payment rule, the existence 
of, the costs of responding to, and the outcome of, qui tam or whistleblower suits or ED investigations could have a material 
adverse effect on our reputation causing our enrollments to decline, could cause us to incur costs that are material to our 
business, and could impact the ability of our institutions to participate in Title IV programs, among other things. As a result, our 
business could be materially and adversely affected.

A failure to comply with the Department of Education’s “gainful employment” regulations could result in the loss 
of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs.

Under the HEA proprietary schools are generally eligible to participate in Title IV programs only in respect of educational 
programs that prepare students for “gainful employment in a recognized occupation.” Historically, this concept has not been 
defined in detailed regulations. On October 29, 2010 and June 13, 2011, the Department of Education (“ED”) published final 
regulations on gainful employment. For more information, see “Regulatory Environment—Federal Support and Regulation of 
Postsecondary Education—Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs—Gainful Employment” in this Annual Report. In 
response to a legal challenge to ED’s gainful employment regulations, on June 30, 2012 the U.S. District Court for the District of 
Columbia struck down the debt measures and all other gainful employment requirements except the disclosure requirements. On 
March 19, 2013, the court denied ED’s motion to reinstate certain of those regulations. Because the disclosure requirements 
were not stuck down, we are required to comply with the disclosure requirements. ED convened a negotiated rulemaking 
committee in September 2013 specifically on the topic of gainful employment programs. For more information about the 
committee’s work, see “Regulatory Environment—Recent Legislative and Regulatory Matters—Regulatory Activity—Pending 
Rulemakings” in this Annual Report. On March 14, 2014, ED released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to gainful 
employment programs.

On October 31, 2014, ED released final regulations, which will go into effect on July 1, 2015. The final regulations establish 
debt-related measures for determining whether certain postsecondary education programs prepare students for gainful 
employment in a recognized occupation. The final regulations set forth two debt-to-earnings measures: an annual earnings rate 
and a discretionary income rate. Under the final rule, a program will pass the measures if its graduates have annual loan 
payments less than or equal to 8% of their total earnings or less than or equal to 20% of their discretionary income. A program 
that does not pass either of the debt-to-earnings measures and that has an annual earnings rate that is greater than 8% and 
less than or equal to 12%, or a discretionary income rate that is greater than 20% and less than or equal to 30%, would be 
considered to be in a warning “zone.” Subject to the potential for adjustments based on a transition period, a program will fail 
the measures if its annual earnings rate is greater than 12% (or the denominator of the rate (annual earnings) is zero) and its 
discretionary income rate is greater than 30% (or the income for the denominator of the rate (discretionary earnings) is negative 
or zero).

A program will become ineligible for Title IV funding if it fails both debt-to-earnings measures twice in three consecutive years, 
or if the program is in the “zone” for four consecutive years. An institution will be required to provide warnings to students, 

87

FORM 10-Kincluding prospective students, when notified by ED that a program could become ineligible based on its final debt-to-earnings 
measures for the next award year.

In addition to the debt-to-earnings measures, the final regulations include additional requirements related to gainful employment 
programs. For example, the final regulations require an institution’s most senior executive officer to certify, as part of the 
program participation agreement, that each of its eligible gainful employment programs offered by the institution satisfies 
certain requirements related to institutional and programmatic accreditation and professional licensure, or certification exam 
requirements. Also, the final regulation expands upon current gainful employment program disclosure requirements.

The gainful employment regulations could put the continuing Title IV eligibility of our educational programs at risk due to factors 
beyond our control, such as changes in the actual or deemed income level of our graduates, changes in student borrowing 
levels, increases in interest rates, changes in the federal poverty income level relevant for calculating discretionary income, and 
other factors. Failure to satisfy the gainful employment measures could reduce the ability of our institutions to offer or continue 
certain types of programs for which there is market demand, which could therefore impact our ability to maintain or grow our 
business. Additionally, the expanded gainful employment program disclosure requirements could adversely impact student 
enrollment, persistence, and retention if our institutions’ disclosed program information compares unfavorably with disclosed 
information of other educational institutions.

Our institutions may lose eligibility to participate in Title IV programs if their student loan default rates are too 
high, and if our institutions lose that eligibility our future growth could be impaired.

To remain eligible to participate in Title IV programs, an educational institution’s federal student loan cohort default rates must 
remain below certain specified levels. Each cohort is the group of students who first enter into student loan repayment during a 
federal fiscal year (ending September 30). The measurement period for the student loan cohort default rates has been increased 
from two to three years starting with the 2009 cohort. For more information including the default rates of our institutions, see 
“Regulatory Environment—Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements—Department of Education—
Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs—Student Loan Defaults.” Given that APUS and HCON only relatively recently 
began to participate in Title IV programs and that the number of students receiving Title IV program funds has grown signifi-
cantly over time, the cohort default rates in the first few years of participation may not be indicative of the rates that will be 
applicable to both institutions over the long term as a greater number of students enter repayment.

If an institution’s three-year cohort default rate equals or exceeds 30% for any given year, it must establish a default prevention 
task force and develop a default prevention plan with measurable objectives for improving the cohort default rate. Beginning 
with the three-year cohort default rate for the 2011 cohort published in September 2014, only three-year cohort default rates 
will be applied for purposes of measuring compliance. Educational institutions will lose eligibility to participate in Title IV 
programs if their three-year cohort default rate exceeds 40% for any given year or is equal to or greater than 30% for three 
consecutive years.

If one of our institutions is required to develop a default prevention plan it may increase our administrative costs which would 
adversely impact our results of operations. Recently there has been increased attention by members of Congress and others on 
default aversion activities of proprietary education institutions. If such attention leads to congressional or regulatory action 
restricting the types of default aversion assistance that educational institutions are permitted to provide, the default rates of 
our former students may be negatively impacted. Such attention could also lead to Congressional proposals to increase the 
measuring period, which could negatively impact our default rates. If one of our institutions loses its eligibility to participate in 
Title IV programs because of high student loan default rates, students would no longer be eligible to use Title IV program funds 

88

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.at that institution, which would significantly reduce our enrollments and revenues and have a material adverse effect on our 
results of operations.

We rely on third parties to administer our institutions’ participation in Title IV programs and their failure to 
perform services as agreed or to comply with applicable regulations could cause us to lose our eligibility to 
participate in Title IV programs.

ED’s regulations permit an institution to enter into a written contract with a third-party servicer for the administration of any 
aspect of the institution’s participation in Title IV programs. The third-party servicer must, among other obligations, comply with 
Title IV requirements and be jointly and severally liable with the institution to the Secretary of Education for any violation by the 
servicer of any Title IV provision. APUS has previously utilized third-party servicers for the processing of financial aid and may 
do so again in the future. Our institutions have third-party servicers for other specific matters, such as default management and 
processing student credit balance refunds, and may consider using third-party servicers for other functions in the future that are 
currently managed directly by our institutions. If any third-party servicer that we have engaged does not comply with applicable 
statutes and regulations including the HEA, our institutions may be liable for its actions, and our institutions could lose eligibility 
to participate in Title IV programs. In the event that one of our third-party servicers fails to perform the services as agreed it 
may impact our ability to operate, negatively impact our eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, and otherwise negatively 
materially impact our financial condition. Further, in the event that our institutions transition to or from a third-party servicer 
there would be costs and risks related to the transition which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Our institutions will be subject to sanctions that could be material to our results and damage our reputation  
if the Department of Education determines that our institutions failed to correctly calculate and return timely 
Title IV program funds for students who withdraw before completing their educational program.

An institution participating in Title IV programs must correctly calculate the amount of unearned Title IV program funds that 
have been disbursed to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completion, and must return those 
unearned funds to the Title IV programs in a timely manner, generally within 45 days after the date the school determines that 
the student has withdrawn. Under ED regulations, late returns of Title IV program funds for 5% or more of students sampled in 
connection with the institution’s annual compliance audit constitute material noncompliance for which an institution generally 
must submit an irrevocable letter of credit.

HCON’s Title IV compliance audit for the year ended December 31, 2012 identified a deficiency related to timely return of Title IV 
program funds. In a Preliminary Audit Determination Letter dated July 10, 2013, ED requested additional information from HCON 
about the situation and required HCON to conduct a file review to identify those files that reflected an inaccurate refund. ED has 
said that the matter will be addressed as part of its review of HCON’s application for a change of ownership that HCON filed in 
connection with our acquisition of it on November 1, 2013. If ED determines that Title IV funds were not properly calculated and 
timely returned, we may have to repay Title IV funds, post a letter of credit with ED in an amount equal to 25% of the total dollar 
amount of unearned Title IV funds that the institution was required to return with respect to withdrawn students during the 
most recently completed fiscal year, or otherwise be sanctioned by ED, which could increase HCON’s cost of regulatory compli-
ance and adversely affect our financial condition.

Our institutions’ failure to comply with ED’s substantial misrepresentation rules could result in sanctions.

ED may take action against an institution in the event of substantial misrepresentation by the institution concerning the nature 
of its educational programs, its financial charges, or the employability of its graduates. The Program Integrity Regulations 
expanded the definition of “substantial misrepresentation” to cover additional representatives of the institution and additional 

89

FORM 10-Ksubstantive areas, expanded the parties to whom a substantial misrepresentation cannot be made, and increased actions ED 
may take if it determines that an institution has engaged in substantial misrepresentation. An institution engages in substantial 
misrepresentation when the institution itself, one of its representatives, or an organization or person with which the institution 
has an agreement to provide educational programs, marketing, advertising, or admissions services, makes a substantial 
misrepresentation directly or indirectly to a student, prospective student or any member of the public, or to an accrediting 
agency, a state agency, or to the Secretary of Education.

If ED determines that an institution has engaged in substantial misrepresentation, ED may (i) if the institution is provisionally 
certified, revoke an institution’s program participation agreement or impose limitations on its participation in Title IV programs, 
(ii) deny participation applications made on behalf of the institution, or (iii) initiate a proceeding against the institution to fine the 
institution or to limit, suspend or terminate the institution’s participation in Title IV programs. We expect that there could be an 
industry-wide increase in administrative actions and litigation claiming substantial misrepresentation. If such administrative 
actions or litigation were brought against us or our institutions, we would incur legal costs related to their investigation and 
defense, which could materially and adversely impact our financial condition.

Failure to comply with ED’s credit hour requirements could result in sanctions.

In the Program Integrity Regulations, ED defined “credit hour” for Title IV purposes as an institutionally established equivalency 
that reasonably approximates certain specified time in class and outside class, or an equivalent amount of work for other 
academic activities. The Program Integrity Regulations also require institutional accreditors to review the reliability and 
accuracy of an institution’s credit hour assignments. An accreditor must take appropriate actions to address an institution’s 
credit hour deficiencies and to notify ED if it finds systemic noncompliance or significant noncompliance in one or more pro-
grams. ED has indicated that if it finds an institution to be out of compliance with the credit hour definition for Title IV purposes, 
it may require the institution to repay the amount of Title IV awarded under the incorrect assignment of credit hours and, if it 
finds significant overstatement of credit hours, it may fine the institution or limit, suspend, or terminate its participation in Title 
IV programs. Any such action could materially and adversely affect the business of our institutions. For more information, see 
the “Regulatory Environment—Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements—Department of 
Education—Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs—Credit Hours” section of this Annual Report.

Government and regulatory agencies and third parties may conduct compliance reviews, bring claims, or  
initiate litigation against us, any of which could disrupt our institutions’ operations and adversely affect  
their performance.

Because our institutions operate in a highly regulated industry, we are subject to audits, compliance reviews, inquiries, com-
plaints, investigations, claims of noncompliance, and lawsuits by government agencies, regulatory agencies, and third parties, 
including claims brought by third parties on behalf of the federal government. For example, ED regularly conducts program reviews 
of educational institutions that are participating in Title IV programs and the ED Office of Inspector General regularly conducts 
audits and investigations of such institutions. If the results of compliance reviews or other proceedings are unfavorable to us, or if 
we are unable to defend successfully against lawsuits or claims, our institutions may be required to pay monetary damages or be 
subject to fines, limitations, loss of Title IV funding, injunctions, or other penalties, including the requirement to make refunds. 
Even if our institutions adequately address issues raised by an agency review or successfully defend a lawsuit or claim, we may 
have to divert significant financial and management resources from our ongoing business operations to address issues raised by 
those reviews or to defend against those lawsuits or claims. Claims and lawsuits brought against us or one of our institutions may 
result in reputational damage, even if such claims and lawsuits are without merit. Any one of these sanctions could materially 
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and result in the imposition of significant 
restrictions on us and our institutions, which may materially adversely affect our ability to operate.

90

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Investigations by state Attorneys General, Congress, and governmental agencies may result in increased 
regulatory burdens and costs.

We and other proprietary postsecondary education providers have been subject to increased regulatory scrutiny and litigation  
in recent years. State Attorneys General have increasingly focused on allegations of improper recruiting compensation and 
deceptive marketing practices, among other issues. A number of state Attorneys General have launched investigations into 
proprietary postsecondary education institutions. In July 2011, the Attorney General of Kentucky announced a national biparti-
san effort, which now includes approximately 30 states, to examine potential abuses by proprietary educational institutions. 
While the initial goal of the joint investigation is sharing information among the Attorneys General about potential violations  
of consumer protection laws, the Attorney General of Kentucky indicated that the Attorneys General may ultimately attempt to 
compel proprietary institutions located in their respective jurisdictions to revise their recruiting practices. In January 2014, many 
of the publicly traded for-profit postsecondary institutions, not including us, received demands for information from a network  
of 12 state Attorneys General relating to, among other matters, the recruitment of students, admissions standards, graduate 
placement statistics, graduate certification and licensing results, and student lending activities. In June 2014, the 
Massachusetts’ Attorney General released several consumer protection regulations, which among other things require certain 
disclosures that apply to for-profit and occupational schools operating in the state. Actions by state Attorneys General and other 
governmental agencies, whether or not involving us or our institutions, could damage our reputation and the reputation of our 
institutions and limit the ability to recruit and enroll students, which could reduce student demand for our institutions’ programs 
and adversely impact our revenue and cash flow from operations.

In addition, in recent years, the student lending practices of postsecondary educational institutions, financial aid officers, and 
student loan providers have been subjected to several investigations by state Attorneys General, Congress, and governmental 
agencies. These investigations concern, among other things, possible deceptive practices in the marketing of private student 
loans and loans provided by lenders pursuant to Title IV programs. The Higher Education Opportunity Act, or HEOA, contains 
new requirements pertinent to relationships between lenders and institutions. In addition, the HEOA imposes substantive and 
disclosure obligations on institutions that make available a list of recommended lenders for potential borrowers. In addition, 
new procedures introduced and recommendations made by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau create uncertainty about 
whether Congress will impose new burdens on private student lenders. State legislators have also passed or may be consider-
ing legislation related to relationships between lenders and institutions. In addition, several federal agencies announced a new 
online student complaint system for service members, veterans, and their families to report negative experiences at education 
institutions and training programs administering the Post-9/11 GI Bill, DoD tuition assistance programs, and other military- 
related education benefit programs. We can neither know nor predict with certainty the effects of such developments. 
Governmental action may impose increased administrative and regulatory costs and adversely affect our financial condition.

If we undergo a change in ownership and control, the Department of Education will place our institutions on 
provisional certification, and the terms of that provisional certification could limit our institutions’ potential for 
growth and adversely affect our institutions’ enrollment, and our revenues and results of operations.

ED’s regulations provide that a change of control of a publicly traded corporation occurs if: (i) there is an event that would 
obligate the corporation to file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing a change of control; or (ii) the corporation 
has a stockholder that owns at least 25% of the total outstanding voting stock of the corporation and is the largest stockholder 
of the corporation, and that stockholder ceases to own at least 25% of such stock or ceases to be the largest stockholder. A 
significant purchase or disposition of our voting stock could be determined by ED to be a change in ownership and control under 
this standard. Under the HEA, an institution whose parent undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change in control 
loses its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs and must apply to ED in order to reestablish such eligibility.

91

FORM 10-KFuture transactions could constitute a change in ownership or control under ED regulations and could cause ED to place our 
institutions on provisional certification as required by the HEA. The conditions of provisional certification or closer review by 
ED could impact, among other things, our institutions’ ability to add educational programs, add additional locations, our ability 
to acquire other institutions, or make other significant changes. In addition, if ED were to determine that our institutions were 
unable to meet their responsibilities while they were provisionally certified, ED could seek to revoke our institutions’ certifica-
tion to participate in Title IV programs with fewer due process protections than if they were fully certified. Limitations on our 
institutions’ operations could, and the loss of our institutions’ certification to participate in Title IV programs would, adversely 
affect our institutions’ ability to grow in addition to having adverse effects on their enrollment, and our revenues and results 
of operations.

If regulators do not approve or delay their approval of transactions involving a change of control of our company 
or of institutions that we own or acquire, our and our institutions’ ability to operate could be impaired.

If we or one of our institutions experiences a change of ownership or control under the standards of applicable state regulatory 
bodies, accrediting agencies, ED, or other regulators, we or the institution governed by such agencies must notify or seek the 
approval of each relevant regulatory agency. Transactions or events that constitute a change of control include significant 
acquisitions or dispositions of an institution’s common stock, significant changes in the composition of an institution’s Board of 
Directors, internal restructurings, acquisitions of institutions from other owners, or certain other transactions. Some of these 
transactions or events may be beyond our control. Our or our institutions’ failure to obtain, or a delay in receiving, approval of 
any change of control from the relevant regulatory agencies following a transaction involving a change of ownership or control 
could result in a suspension of operating authority or suspension or loss of federal student financial aid funding, which could 
have a material adverse effect on our institutions and our financial condition. Our failure to obtain, or a delay in receiving, 
approval of any change of control from other states in which we are currently licensed or authorized could require our institu-
tions to suspend activities in that state or otherwise impair our institutions’ operations. The potential adverse effects of a 
change of control could influence future decisions by us and our stockholders regarding the sale, purchase, transfer, issuance,  
or redemption of our stock. In addition, the regulatory burdens and risks associated with a change of control also could have  
an adverse effect on the market price of your shares.

The U.S. Congress has been examining the for-profit postsecondary education sector, which could result  
in legislation, heightened oversight, or additional Department of Education rulemaking that may limit or  
condition Title IV program participation of proprietary schools in a manner that may materially and adversely 
affect our business.

In recent years, the U.S. Congress has increased its focus on for-profit education institutions, including a review of their 
participation in Title IV programs. This increased focus has resulted in the introduction of various pieces of legislation, the 
holding of several hearings by various Congressional committees, and Congressional investigations and inquiries. We have 
previously incurred significant legal and other costs to respond to congressional inquiries, and could incur significant legal and 
other costs to respond to any future inquiries. We cannot predict the extent to which, or whether, these hearings and investiga-
tions will result in legislation, further rulemaking affecting our participation in Title IV programs, or litigation alleging statutory 
violations, regulatory infractions or common law causes of action. The adoption of any law or regulation that reduces funding for 
federal student financial aid programs or the ability of our institutions or students to participate in these programs could have a 
material adverse effect on our student population and revenue. Legislative action also may increase our administrative costs 
and require our institutions to modify their practices in order to comply with applicable requirements. Additionally, actions by 
state Attorneys General and other governmental agencies could damage our reputation and limit our institutions’ ability to 
recruit and enroll students, which could reduce student demand for our institutions’ programs and adversely impact our revenue 
and cash flow from operations.

92

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Congressional examination of Department of Defense oversight of tuition assistance used for distance education 
and proprietary institutions and pending rulemaking by the Department of Defense could result in legislative or 
regulatory changes that may materially and adversely affect our business.

In recent years, the U.S. Congress has increased its focus on Department of Defense, DoD, tuition assistance that is used for 
distance education and programs at proprietary institutions. In September 2010, the Subcommittee on Oversight and 
Investigations of the U.S. House of Representatives’ Armed Services Committee held a hearing titled “A Question of Quality and 
Value: Department of Defense Oversight of Tuition Assistance Used for Distance Learning and For-Profit Colleges.” Witnesses 
and Subcommittee members expressed concern about DoD’s oversight of distance education programs, especially those offered 
by proprietary institutions. In addition, in December 2010, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, or HELP, 
released a report entitled “Benefitting Whom? For-Profit Education Companies and the Growth of Military Educational Benefits,” 
which raised questions about the growing share of DoD tuition assistance received by proprietary institutions. In March 2011, 
the GAO published a report entitled “DoD Education Benefits: Increased Oversight of Tuition Assistance Program is Needed,” 
which offered several recommendations for improving accountability within the tuition assistance program. In September 2011, 
the Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International 
Security held a hearing focused on the classification of military education benefits under the 90/10 Rule. Some of the panelists 
suggested that the classification of military benefits as non-Title IV revenue for purposes of the 90/10 Rule has led some 
for-profit institutions to recruit aggressively and sometimes illegally members of the military in order to ensure compliance with 
the 90/10 Rule.

The 90/10 Rule has been a subject of interest over the past several Congresses, which has resulted in several members of 
Congress introducing proposals and legislation that would modify the 90/10 Rule. One past proposal would decrease the limit 
from 90% to 85% and would count DoD tuition assistance (TA) and GI Bill education benefits (VA) toward that limit. Such a 
proposal or other similar legislation, should it become law, could have a material adverse impact on the operations of APUS and 
potentially HCON. We cannot predict the extent to which, or whether, congressional hearings will affect DoD’s current rulemak-
ing or result in legislation or further rulemaking affecting our institutions’ ability to participate in DoD tuition assistance 
programs or Title IV programs. Members of Congress have stated, both in committee hearings and in the HELP Committee 
report, that Congress should revise the 90/10 Rule to count DoD tuition assistance and VA veterans educational benefits toward 
the 90% limit. In January 2012 and again in November 2013, Senator Durbin and former Senator Harkin introduced a bill to 
modify the 90/10 Rule by reducing the threshold to 85% and counting Title IV programs, DoD tuition assistance program, and VA 
education benefits programs as sources from which an institution may derive no more than 85% of its revenue. A companion bill 
was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives in November 2013. In February 2012, companion bills were introduced in 
the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives that would modify the 90/10 Rule to count DoD tuition assistance and VA 
veterans educations benefits toward the 90% limit, along with Title IV programs. We cannot predict the likelihood that Congress 
will amend the 90/10 Rule to count DoD tuition assistance and VA education benefits toward the 90% limit or to lower the ratio 
to 85/15, nor can we predict the likelihood that Congress or the President will take some other action to limit the use of DoD 
tuition assistance and VA education benefits at proprietary institutions. To the extent that any laws or regulations are adopted 
that limit or condition the participation of proprietary schools or distance education programs in DoD tuition assistance pro-
grams or in Title IV programs, or that limit or condition the amount of DoD tuition assistance for which proprietary schools or 
distance education programs are eligible to receive, our financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

93

FORM 10-KCongress has in the past changed, and may in the future change, eligibility standards and funding levels for 
federal student financial aid programs, military tuition assistance, and other programs. Other governmental or 
regulatory bodies may also change similar laws or regulations relating to such programs, which could adversely 
affect our student population, revenues and profit margin.

Political and budgetary concerns can significantly affect Title IV programs, military tuition assistance programs, and other laws 
and regulations governing federal and state aid programs.

Title IV programs are made available pursuant to the provisions of the HEA, and the HEA comes up for reauthorization by 
Congress approximately every five to six years. Authorization of appropriations for most HEA programs is provided through federal 
fiscal year 2016, by the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015. In the past, Congress has passed short-
term nonsubstantive extensions of the HEA pending comprehensive reauthorization legislation. Further, when Congress does not 
act on comprehensive reauthorization through a single piece of legislation, it may act through multiple pieces of legislation. 
Congress completed the most recent reauthorization through multiple pieces of legislation and may reauthorize the HEA in a 
piecemeal manner in the future. Additionally, Congress determines the funding level for each Title IV program on an annual basis.

Future Congressional action, including in reauthorizations or appropriations acts, may result in numerous legislative changes, 
including those that could adversely affect the ability of our institutions to participate in Title IV programs, military tuition 
assistance programs, and the availability of such funding sources for our students. Members of Congress frequently propose 
legislation to alter or amend the terms under which our institutions participate in the federal student financial aid programs. Any 
action by Congress that significantly reduces funding for Title IV programs or the ability of our institutions or students to 
participate in these programs could materially harm our institutions’ business. A reduction in government funding levels could 
lead to lower enrollments at our institutions and require our institutions to arrange for alternative sources of financial aid for 
their students. Lower student enrollments at our institutions or their inability to arrange alternative sources of funding could 
adversely affect our financial condition. Congressional action may also require our institutions to modify their practices in ways 
that could result in increased administrative and regulatory costs and decreased profit margins.

We are not in a position to predict with certainty whether any legislation will be passed by Congress or signed into law in the 
future. The reallocation of funding among Title IV programs, material changes in the requirements for participation in such 
programs, or the substitution of materially different Title IV programs could reduce the ability of certain students to finance their 
education at our institutions and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

New rulemaking by ED could result in regulatory changes that materially and adversely affect our operations, 
business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow.

On December 3, 2014, ED issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that proposes to implement requirements for the teacher 
preparation program accountability system under HEA, and amend the regulations governing the Teacher Education Assistance 
for College and Higher Education (TEACH) Grant Program under HEA such that TEACH Grant program funding would be condi-
tioned on teacher preparation program quality. We cannot predict the extent to which these proposed rules will impact our 
institutions’ enrollments or reputation, nor can we predict possible regulatory burdens and costs.

Also, in the spring of 2014, the Program Integrity and Improvement negotiated rulemaking committee failed to reach consensus. 
As a result, ED may develop and issue notices of proposed rulemaking addressing cash management issues, such as the 
regulation of campus debit cards, and state authorization of distance education. Because ED failed to issue proposed regula-
tions before November 1, 2014, the earliest these regulations could take effect is July 1, 2016. In addition, on December 19, 
2014, ED announced its intention to form a negotiated rulemaking committee to “(1) prepare proposed regulations to establish a 

94

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.new Pay as You Earn repayment plan for those not covered by the existing Pay as You Earn Repayment Plan in the Federal Direct 
Loan Program, and (2) establish procedures for Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program loan holders to identify U.S. 
military servicemembers who may be eligible for a lower interest rate on their FFEL Program loans under section 527 of the 
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA).” ED reserves the right to add to or remove these tentative topics for the proposed 
negotiated rulemaking. We cannot predict the nature of any final rules that may be adopted through this negotiated rulemaking 
process or their impact on our financial condition.

Our regulatory environment and our reputation may be negatively influenced by the actions of other  
for-profit institutions.

Our institutions are two of a much larger number of for-profit institutions serving the postsecondary education market. In recent 
years, regulatory investigations and civil litigation have been commenced against several for-profit educational institutions. 
These investigations and lawsuits have alleged, among other things, deceptive trade practices and noncompliance with ED 
regulations. These allegations have attracted adverse media coverage and have been the subject of federal and state legislative 
hearings. Broader allegations against the overall for-profit school sector may negatively affect public perceptions of for-profit 
educational institutions, including our institutions. In addition, in recent years, reports on student lending practices of various 
lending institutions and schools, including for-profit schools, and investigations by a number of state attorneys general, 
Congress and governmental agencies have led to adverse media coverage of postsecondary education. Adverse media coverage 
regarding others in our industry, or regarding us or our institutions directly, could damage our reputation, could result in lower 
enrollments at our institutions, lower revenues and operating profit, and could have a negative impact on our stock price. Such 
allegations could also result in increased scrutiny and regulation by ED, Congress, accrediting bodies, state legislatures, state 
attorneys general, or other governmental authorities with respect to all for-profit institutions, including us and our institutions.

Risks Related to Owning our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may be volatile, and as a result returns on an investment in our common stock 
may be volatile.

For a significant portion of the time since our initial public offering, we have had relatively limited public float, and trading in our 
common stock has also been limited and, at times, volatile. An active trading market for our common stock may not be sus-
tained, and the trading price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate as a result of:

•  price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;

•  significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of comparable companies;

•  actual or anticipated changes in our earnings, our institutions’ enrollments or net course registrations, or fluctuations in our 

operating results or in the expectations of securities analysts;

•  the actual, anticipated or perceived impact of changes in government policies, laws and regulations, or similar changes made 

by accrediting bodies;

•  the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;

•  general economic conditions and trends;

•  catastrophic events;

•  sales of large blocks of our stock; or

•  recruitment or departure of key personnel.

95

FORM 10-KIn the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has 
often been brought against that company. Because of the potential volatility of our stock price, we may become the target of 
securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and monetary damages and could divert 
management’s attention and resources from our business.

Seasonal and other fluctuations in our results of operations could adversely affect the trading price of our 
common stock.

Our quarterly results fluctuate and, therefore, the results in any quarter may not represent the results we may achieve in any 
subsequent quarter or full year. Our revenues and operating results normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal or other variations 
in our institutions’ enrollments and associated expenses. Student population at our institutions varies as a result of new 
enrollments, graduations, student attrition, the success of our marketing programs, and other reasons that we cannot always 
anticipate. We expect quarterly fluctuations in operating results to continue as a result of seasonal enrollment patterns at our 
institutions and related fluctuations in expenses. These fluctuations may result in volatility in our results of operations, have an 
adverse effect on the market price of our common stock, or both.

Provisions in our organizational documents and in the Delaware General Corporation Law may prevent takeover 
attempts that could be beneficial to our stockholders.

Provisions in our charter and bylaws and in the Delaware General Corporation Law may make it difficult and expensive for a 
third party to pursue a takeover attempt we oppose even if a change in control of our company would be beneficial to the 
interests of our stockholders. These provisions include:

•  the ability of our Board of Directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the 
powers, preferences and rights of each series without stockholder approval, which may discourage unsolicited acquisition 
proposals or make it more difficult for a third party to gain control of our company;

•  a requirement that stockholders provide advance notice of their intention to nominate a director or to propose any other 

business at an annual meeting of stockholders;

•  a prohibition against stockholder action by means of written consent unless otherwise approved by our Board of Directors in 

advance; and

•  Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits us from engaging in mergers and other 
business combinations with stockholders that beneficially own 15% or more of our voting stock, or with their affiliates, 
unless our directors or stockholders approve the business combination in the prescribed manner.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

Item 2.  Properties
American Public Education, Inc., or APEI, and American Public University System, Inc., or APUS, together operate administrative 
facilities in Charles Town, West Virginia and in Manassas, Virginia, which are within a one hour drive of each other and located 
within the Washington, DC metropolitan area. The corporate headquarters and administrative offices are located in the 
immediate Charles Town area, occupying 14 owned facilities totaling approximately 253,000 square feet. These properties 
include approximately 40,000 square feet that is under construction. APUS also owns two and a half acres of land in Charles 
Town for future development to support potential growth and expansion. APUS’s student services, graduations and marketing 
operations are located in Manassas in leased facilities totaling approximately 63,000 square feet. In 2015, APUS intends to 

96

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.terminate leases for approximately 38,000 square feet in Manassas, but will continue to lease approximately 25,000 square 
feet in Manassas pursuant to a lease which expires in 2018.

Hondros College of Nursing, or HCON, operates four Ohio campuses in the suburban areas of Cincinnati, (West Chester), 
Columbus (Westerville), Dayton (Fairborn) and Cleveland (Independence). These campuses include a total of eight leased 
facilities with approximately 90,000 square feet combined. The facilities are primarily used for instructional activities. The main 
campus in Westerville, Ohio also serves as HCON’s corporate offices and houses additional administrative services, such as the 
technology, marketing and student services departments. Lease terms and extension options vary by facility, with termination 
dates ranging from 2022 to 2029.

The Company believes its existing facilities are in good operating condition and are adequate and suitable for the conduct of  
its business.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we have been and may be involved in various legal proceedings. We currently have no material legal 
proceedings pending. However, on or about November 18, 2013, a putative class action styled Tabatha Vickery, Bryan Lynn,  
on behalf of themselves and a similarly situated class v. Hondros College, Inc. and John G. Hondros, was filed in the Court of 
Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, as Case No. CV 13 817299. National Education Seminars, Inc., which we refer to as 
Hondros College of Nursing, or HCON, was not named in the lawsuit, but a then member of HCON’s Board of Directors, John 
Hondros, was named in the lawsuit, and the allegations made in the Complaint related to HCON’s operations and not the 
operations of the entity named in the lawsuit. The lawsuit asserted claims for fraud and fraudulent inducement, negligent 
misrepresentation, breach of implied-in-fact contract, promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment, and violation of the Ohio 
Consumer Sales Practices Act, for, among other things, the alleged provision of false or misleading information to the named 
plaintiffs and other putative class members in 2011 and 2012 regarding the status of accreditation by the National League for 
Nursing Accrediting Commission of HCON’s Associate Degree in Nursing, or ADN, program offered at its Independence, Ohio 
campus. The plaintiffs alleged that the putative class consisted of more than 60 former students who in the summer or fall 
quarters of 2011 enrolled in the ADN or the licensed practical nursing, or LPN, program at the Independence campus with the 
intention of pursuing a degree in nursing, but who withdrew from the ADN or LPN program. On February 11, 2014, the plaintiffs 
filed their First Amended Complaint, which removed Hondros College, Inc. as a defendant and added HCON as a defendant. In 
order to avoid further litigation related expenses, HCON and the named plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement on 
November 19, 2014 under which the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss their First Amended Complaint in exchange for a de minimis 
settlement payment. HCON admitted to no wrongdoing in the settlement agreement. On December 17, 2014, the parties filed  
a voluntary stipulation with the court dismissing the case with prejudice.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.

97

FORM 10-KPART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder  

Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “APEI.” The following table sets forth, for the 
period indicated, the high and low sales price of the Company’s common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

Year Ended December 31, 2013
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

Year Ended December 31, 2014
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

Low

$29.20
$31.95
$36.65
$34.40

$33.47
$32.51
$26.98
$26.24

High

$42.17
$39.85
$41.15
$46.69

$46.62
$38.00
$36.47
$37.40

Holders
As of February 24, 2015, there were approximately 462 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends
We have not historically paid dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on 
our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of any dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board  
of Directors and will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, contractual 
restrictions, outstanding indebtedness, and other factors deemed relevant by our board.

98

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative five-year total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total 
returns of the S&P 500 index, the NASDAQ Composite index and a customized peer group of ten companies that includes: Apollo 
Education Group Inc.; Bridgepoint Education Inc.; Capella Education Company; Career Education Corporation; Corinthian Colleges 
Inc.; DeVry Education Group Inc.; Grand Canyon Education Inc.; ITT Educational Services Inc.; National American University 
Holdings, Inc.; and Strayer Education, Inc. We have removed Education Management Corporation from the customized peer 
group because it is no longer a listed public company. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock, 
in each index, and in the peer group (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on December 31, 2009 and tracks the value 
of those investments, respectively, through December 31, 2014.

Comparison of 5-Year Cumulative Total Return*

Among American Public Education, Inc., the S&P 500 Index, the NASDAQ Composite Index, and a Peer Group

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

0

12/09

12/10

12/11

12/12

12/13

12/14

American Public Education, Inc.
S&P 500

NASDAQ Composite
Peer Group

*$100 invested on 12/31/09 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 31.
Copyright© 2015 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.

The information contained in the performance graph shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities 
and Exchange Commission nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference into any prior or future filing under 
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.

Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
Not applicable.

99

FORM 10-KPurchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
On May 14, 2012, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $20 million of shares of our common stock. 
On March 14, 2013, our Board of Directors increased the authorization by an additional $15 million of shares and on June 13, 
2014, our Board of Directors increased the authorization by an additional $15 million of shares. Subject to market conditions, 
applicable legal requirements and other factors, the repurchases may be made from time to time in open market transactions or 
privately negotiated transactions. The authorization does not obligate us to acquire any shares, and purchases may be com-
menced or suspended at any time based on market conditions and other factors that we deem appropriate.

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2014, we repurchased 530,962 shares under our repurchase programs for an 
aggregate amount of $18.5 million. As of December 31, 2014, $15.0 million remained authorized for repurchase under the 
expanded programs.

The following table presents the share repurchases by the Company during the quarter ended December 31, 2014. For additional 
information regarding the Company’s share repurchases please refer to “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes 
to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7. Stockholders’ Equity—Repurchase.”

Total Number  
of Shares 
Purchased as 
Part of Publicly 
Announced Plans 
or Programs

Maximum 
Number of Shares 
that May Yet  
Be Purchased 
Under the Plans 
or Programs(1)

Maximum Number 
(or Approximate 
Dollar Value)  
of Shares that May 
Yet Be Purchased 
Under the Plans  
or Programs(2,3)

Total Number  
of Shares 
Purchased

Average  
Price Paid  
per Share

  30,000
  84,634
114,634

$35.48
$34.09
$34.45

  30,000
  84,634
114,634

114,634
  84,634
       —
       —

$15,027,043
$15,027,043
$15,027,043
$15,027,043

Period

October 1, 2014–October 31, 2014
November 1, 2014–November 30, 2014
December 1, 2014–December 31, 2014
Total

(1)  On December 9, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for its common stock, under which we may annually 

purchase up to the cumulative number of shares issued or deemed issued under our equity incentive and stock purchase plans. Repurchases 
may be made from time to time in the open market at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions based on business and 
market conditions. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time, and will be funded using our available cash. 
On October 10, 2014, we issued 114,634 common shares under our equity incentive plan, and in November and December 2014 we purchased on 
the open market 114,634 common shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program.

(2)  On May 14, 2012, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $20 million of shares of our common stock. On March 14, 2013, 
our Board of Directors increased this authorization by $15 million of shares and on June 13, 2014, our Board of Directors increased the authoriza-
tion by an additional $15 million of shares. Subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors, the repurchases may be 
made from time to time in open market transactions or privately negotiated transactions. The authorization does not obligate us to acquire any 
shares, and purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time based on market conditions and other factors that we deem appropriate.

(3)  During the quarter ended December 31, 2014 the Company was deemed to have repurchased 2,682 shares of common stock forfeited by 

employees to satisfy minimum tax-withholding requirements in connection with the vesting of restricted stock grants and to cover the exercise 
and minimum tax-withholding requirements of expiring stock options. These repurchases were not part of the stock repurchase programs 
authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial and operating data as of the dates and for the periods 
indicated. You should read this data together with “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and 
Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

The selected consolidated statement of operations data for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, 
and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, have been derived from our audited 
consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected consolidated statements  

100

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, and selected consolidated balance sheet data as of 
December 31, 2010, 2011, and 2012 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this 
Annual Report. We acquired Hondros College of Nursing, or HCON, on November 1, 2013, and therefore the consolidated results 
for periods prior to November 1, 2013 do not include any results from HCON. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of 
the results of operations to be expected for future periods.

(In thousands, except per share and net registration data)

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Year Ended December 31,

Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues
Costs and expenses:

Instructional costs and services
Selling and promotional
General and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Total costs and expenses

Income from continuing operations before  

interest income and income taxes

Interest income, net
Income from continuing operations before  

income taxes
Income tax expense
Investment income (loss), net of taxes
Net income attributable to common stockholders
Net income attributable to common stockholders  

per common share:
Basic
Diluted

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

Basic
Diluted

Other Data:
Net cash provided by operating activities
Capital expenditures
Stock-based compensation
Adjusted net/APUS Net course registrations(1)

$198,174

$260,377

$313,516

$329,479

$350,020

75,309
34,296
32,045
6,502
148,152

50,022
111

50,133
20,265
—
$  29,868

95,216
44,713
48,350
9,239
197,518

62,859
109

62,968
22,211
—
$  40,757

110,192
59,761
63,615
11,146
244,714

68,802
135

112,784
65,687
70,063
13,508
262,042

67,437
309

123,765
69,229
75,073
16,121
284,188

65,832
361

68,937
26,528
(86)
$  42,323

67,746
25,645
(67)
$  42,034

66,193
25,150
(166)
$  40,877

$      1.63
$      1.59

$      2.28
$      2.23

$      2.38
$      2.35

$      2.38
$      2.35

$      2.36
$      2.33

18,281
18,837

17,877
18,295

17,772
18,041

17,656
17,921

17,357
17,543

$  47,078
$  22,454
$    2,805
259,389

$  70,438
$  24,925
$    3,189
341,669

$  52,838
$  35,014
$    3,818
402,205

$  59,414
$  20,649
$    4,024
409,719

$  61,030
$  24,596
$    5,369
403,920

101

FORM 10-K(In thousands)

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

As of December 31,

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents
Working capital(2)
Total assets
Stockholders’ equity

$  81,352
$  60,417
$141,839
$  97,300

$119,006
$  82,034
$198,891
$133,833

$114,901
$  86,004
$237,603
$171,153

$  94,820
$  62,327
$271,655
$207,069

$115,634
$  87,968
$297,904
$234,218

(In thousands)

Net income attributable to common stockholders
Interest (income), net
Income tax expense
Investment loss, net of taxes
Depreciation and amortization
EBITDA from continuing operations

2010

$29,868
(111)
20,265
—
6,502
$56,524

As of December 31,

2011

$40,757
(109)
22,211
—
9,239
$72,098

2012

$42,323
(135)
26,528
86
11,146
$79,948

2013

$42,034
(309)
25,645
67
13,508
$80,945

2014

$40,877
(361)
25,150
166
16,121
$81,953

(1)  APUS net course registrations represent the aggregate number of courses for which students remain enrolled after the date by which they may 
drop a course without financial penalty. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, one-credit lab courses were combined 
with their related three-credit courses.

(2)  Working capital is calculated by subtracting total current liabilities from total current assets.

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of  

Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion together with the financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this 
Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectations, 
estimates and projections about our business and operations, and involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ 
materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, 
including those we discuss under “Risk Factors,” “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” and elsewhere in this 
Annual Report.

Overview
American Public Education, Inc., or APEI, which together with its subsidiaries is referred to as the “Company,” is a provider of 
online and on-campus postsecondary education to approximately 112,470 students through two subsidiary institutions. We 
provide online postsecondary education primarily directed at the needs of the military and public safety communities through 
American Public University System, or APUS, a regionally accredited online university that includes American Military University, 
or AMU, and American Public University, or APU. We provide on-campus nursing education to students in Ohio through National 
Education Seminars, Inc., which we refer to as Hondros College of Nursing, or HCON. HCON operates four campuses in the 
State of Ohio, as well as an online RN-to-BSN Program, in order to serve the needs of the nursing and healthcare community. 
Additional information regarding our subsidiary institutions and their regulation is included in the “Business—Company 
Overview” and “Business—Regulatory Environment” sections of this Annual Report.

Our revenues are largely driven by the number of students enrolled at our institutions and the number of courses that they take. 
Our consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased to $350.0 million from $329.5 million in the year 
ended December 31, 2013. Our consolidated revenue increased to $329.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 from 

102

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.$313.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2012. The revenue increase which occurred in 2014 was caused by the inclusion 
of HCON in our operating results for the entire year, while the revenue increase which occurred in 2013 was caused largely by 
increases in enrollments in our APEI Segment.

Our operations are organized into two reportable segments:

•  American Public Education Segment, or APEI Segment. This segment reflects our historical operations prior to the 
acquisition of HCON and reflects the operational activities of APUS, other corporate activities, and minority investments.

•  Hondros College of Nursing Segment, or HCON Segment. This segment reflects the operational activities of HCON. 
We acquired HCON on November 1, 2013, and therefore the consolidated results for periods prior to November 1, 2013 do 
not include any results from HCON.

Financial information regarding each of our reportable segments is reported in this Annual Report in this “Management’s 
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Operating Results by Reportable Segment Year 
Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial 
Condition and Results of Operations—Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012,” and 
“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Acquisition of HCON. We acquired HCON on November 1, 2013, and we continue to make efforts to grow HCON and improve 
its efficiency. These efforts may result in increased expenses and capital investments, which may not result in improved 
revenues and net income. As required by the Department of Education’s, or ED’s, change in ownership and control regulations, 
HCON is operating under a Temporary Provisional Program Participation Agreement, which requires HCON to comply with 
specific conditions while provisionally certified. If ED approves our application for the change in ownership and control of HCON, 
ED will issue a provisional certification extending for a period expiring not later than the end of the third complete award year 
following the date of such provisional certification. ED generally will not review and approve substantive changes to an 
institution’s scope of certification while a change in ownership application is pending. While HCON’s change in ownership 
application is pending, HCON is therefore unable to obtain approval to award Title IV program funds at new campuses, which 
we believe negatively impacts HCON’s ability to grow. The potential risks associated with the HCON transaction are further 
addressed in the “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business” section of this Annual Report.

Changing Student Body. Although APUS’s focus has broadened, it continues to have an emphasis on its relationship with the 
military community. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 52% of APUS’s students self-reported that they served in the 
military on active duty at the time of initial enrollment, and as a result APUS is particularly reliant on DoD’s tuition assistance 
programs and DoD’s budget. Since APUS began participating in ED’s Title IV financial aid programs, or Title IV programs, a 
significant portion of our growth has been attributable to students using funds from these programs and, as a result, APUS has 
experienced a change in the composition of its student body, which has resulted, and will continue to result, in a need to provide 
a greater level of services to its students. The HCON acquisition has further changed the composition of our student body, 
adding students who attend classes at physical campuses, as well as additional students using Title IV program funds.

The change in the composition of our institutions’ student bodies has made it harder for us to make long-range forecasts about 
student enrollments. We have had increased difficulty forecasting the number of students who will enroll and have noticed a 
decrease in the predictability of the rate at which our institutions convert prospective students into enrolled students. For 
APUS, we attribute this, in part, to the growth in non-military students, and particularly the growth of non-military students 
from outside of public safety communities. If we are unable to manage changes in the composition of our institutions’ student 
bodies and control the growth of related expenditures, we may experience operating inefficiencies that could increase our costs 

103

FORM 10-Kand adversely affect our profitability and results of operations. For more information about the risks related to these challenges 
please see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

Increased Costs and Expenses; Our Initiatives. Our costs and expenses have increased due in part to increased general 
and administrative expenses related to the addition of HCON’s physical campuses, a changing student body, an increase in 
expenditures for financial aid processing, expenditures for technology required to support the increase in non-military students 
at APUS, and increased bad debt primarily associated with non-military students at APUS. Our revenues may decline and our 
costs and expenses may increase as our institutions adjust to changes in their student composition and undertake initiatives to 
improve the learning experience, through initiatives to increase the level of engagement and collaboration in the classroom, and 
attract students who are more likely to persist in their programs. Beginning in the second quarter of 2015, for instance, APUS 
plans to require that prospective students complete a free, non-credit admission course if they are not active duty military or 
veteran applicants, graduates from certified federal, state and local law enforcement and public safety academies, or prospec-
tive students with at least nine hours of transfer credit with a grade of “C” or better for each course from an accredited 
institution. Additional initiatives may include, but are not limited to, the following:

•  other changes to increasing admissions standards and requirements;

• 

implementing more stringent satisfactory academic progress standards;

•  changing tuition costs and payment options;

•  transitioning student facing services, including student financial aid and advising, to new platforms, as well as the use of the 

ClearPath system;

•  experimenting with competency-based learning and other alternative delivery methods; and

•  altering our institutions’ marketing programs to target the appropriate prospective students.

In order to support the current student population at APUS and to provide the technology experience and access across a 
variety of platforms that we believe students have come to expect, we anticipate that we will continue to make significant 
investments in our technology infrastructure and financial aid processing capabilities, including in 2015. These investments will 
result in an increased level of spending, not all of which can be capitalized.

Financial Aid Processing Transition. APUS has decided to work towards transitioning its financial aid processing system 
to its former third-party vendor. There will be significant costs and risks relating to the implementation of this vendor. These 
costs may include costs paid directly to the new vendor, costs related to the efforts of our employees and management, 
costs associated with the transition and training of APUS employees, and costs incurred in terminating APUS’s relationship 
with its existing software vendor. For more information regarding the risks associated with APUS’s financial aid processing 
systems and the transition back to its former financial aid processing service provider, please see “Risk Factors—Risks 
Related to Our Business.”

Increased Bad Debt Expense. We have seen increases in our bad debt expense in our APEI Segment over the past several 
years. We have observed that some students enroll or attempt to enroll at APUS solely to obtain funds from Title IV programs, 
and some students who might not otherwise pursue a degree or certificate are attracted to enroll in APUS’s programs because 
of the availability of such funds. We believe these students may be more likely than other students to cease pursuing a degree 
or certificate due to other factors, such as becoming employed or not having the level of commitment necessary to successfully 
complete the required coursework. As described more fully above in “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business,” we have 
also been the target of suspected fraudulent activities by outside parties with respect to student enrollment and Title IV 
programs, and as we continue to grow we may be susceptible to an increased risk of such activities. We believe the factors 
discussed in this paragraph have been the primary drivers for our increased bad debt expense. We are not able to estimate the 

104

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.number of students who fall into these enrollment categories, and our ability to estimate the impact on our enrollments over 
time is limited, as is our ability to estimate any additional impact that this could have on our exposure to bad debt or the number 
of our students who default on their Title IV student loans. In the second half of 2015, we plan to change the method by which 
we disburse Federal Student Aid from a single disbursement method to a multiple disbursement method for first-time APUS 
undergraduate students. While this change may adversely impact enrollment, we are making this change in order to potentially 
lower bad debt expense and to reduce the attractiveness of our programs to students who are seeking to take improper 
advantage of federal student aid programs. We have no assurance that this change will be successful at reducing bad debt.

Impact of Government Budgetary Pressures. On August 2, 2011, Congress passed the Budget Control Act of 2011, which 
put into place a series of automatic federal budget cuts known as sequestration. The budget cuts, or sequestration, impact 
certain federal student aid programs, as well as Department of Defense, or DoD, tuition assistance programs. As a result of 
sequestration, the size of the military may decrease and amounts available under DoD tuition assistance programs could be 
significantly curtailed or even eliminated, and the time for the various services to process requests for tuition assistance could 
be lengthened. The Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 increased the maximum Pell award to $4,860 
in the 2015–2016 award year, and The Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act provides for an automatic annual increase 
based on changes in the Consumer Price Index—through award year 2017–2018—to the appropriated Federal Pell Grant 
maximum award, resulting in a 2015–2016 maximum award of $5,775. The Pell Grant program could be subject to cuts or 
changes in the future. Cuts to ED’s administrative budget could lead to delays in student eligibility determinations and delays in 
the origination and processing of federal student loans. These events could make it more difficult for students to obtain funding 
for their education, either in a timely manner or at all, and would have an adverse effect on our financial condition. For more 
information on sequestration and other legislative activity that may impact our results, please refer to “Regulatory 
Environment—Recent Legislative and Regulatory Activity.”

In March 2013, in response to sequestration, each of the military services suspended new enrollments in DoD tuition assistance 
programs. As a result of Congressional action, each of the services reinstated enrollments in DoD tuition assistance programs in 
April 2013. However, our results of operations in the second quarter of 2013 were negatively impacted by these actions, 
resulting in what we believe were fewer enrollments at APUS from service members than otherwise would have been achieved. 
In October 2013, DoD tuition assistance programs were temporarily suspended as a result of the U.S. government partial 
shutdown. On October 1, 2013, prior to the government shutdown, APUS course registrations for October 2013 were approxi-
mately 41,200. As of October 14, 2013, however, approximately 13,100 registrations had been dropped, resulting in a net course 
registration reduction of approximately 20% compared to October 2012. We believe that many of these dropped registrations 
resulted from the suspension of DoD tuition assistance programs. After the government shutdown ended, DoD resumed its 
tuition assistance programs; however, we do not believe that APUS’s registrations for subsequent months served to replace, or 
make up, all of the registrations that were dropped. We believe that continued uncertainty regarding the availability of DoD’s 
tuition assistance programs and the impact from the October 2013 temporary suspension may also have negatively impacted our 
net course registrations during 2014.

While DoD tuition assistance programs were reinstated and the government shutdown ended, budgetary pressures remain, and 
we do not know the full scale of future actions that may be taken with respect to DoD tuition assistance programs, which could 
include eliminating those programs, reducing the funds or benefits (or both) available under those programs, or enacting new 
restrictions on participation in those programs. If funds available under DoD tuition assistance programs are reduced or 
eliminated, we believe that most service members would be eligible and able to finance out-of-pocket tuition costs resulting 
from this shortfall using their benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill or the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 
2008, as amended, or the Post-9/11 GI Bill, through the “Top Up” program. The “Top-Up” program allows active-duty service 
members to use their GI Bill or Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to pay the difference between the total cost of a college course and the 
amount of DoD tuition assistance that is paid by the military for the course. However, we do not know whether in the long-term 

105

FORM 10-Kservice members will be willing to use the Top-Up option, or whether the increased administrative process in using the Top-Up 
option or covering the shortfall through other funding sources will lead to service members deciding not to enroll or enrolling at 
a slower rate.

New DoD MOU. Under a DoD final rule, effective January 7, 2013, each institution participating in DoD tuition assistance 
programs is required to sign a Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU, outlining certain commitments and agreements 
between the institution and DoD prior to accepting funds from DoD tuition assistance programs. Since August 14, 2013, DoD has 
issued a series of proposed revisions to the MOU. On July 7, 2014, the DoD released a revised MOU (the “2014 MOU”) and 
institutions were informed that they were required to sign the 2014 MOU on or before September 5, 2014 in order to continue to 
participate in DoD tuition assistance programs. In August 2014, APUS signed the 2014 MOU. Additional information regarding 
the 2014 MOU and potential risks associated with it are further addressed in the “Regulatory Environment—Student Financing 
Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements” and the “Risk Factors” sections of this Annual Report.

Regulated Industry. Our institutions operate in a highly regulated industry. For more information on the regulations to which 
our institutions are subject, please refer to the “Business—Regulatory Environment” section of this Annual Report. Such 
regulations may impact our financial results in a way that we cannot predict, and may have an adverse impact on our financial 
condition.

Our Key Financial Results Metrics

Revenues

In reviewing our revenues we consider the following components: net course registrations and enrollment; tuition rate charged; 
tuition net of scholarships; and other fees.

Net course registrations and enrollment. For financial reporting and analysis purposes, APUS measures its student 
population in terms of aggregate course enrollments, or net course registrations. Course enrollments, or net course registra-
tions, which include one-credit lab courses combined with their related three-credit courses, represent the aggregate number of 
courses in which students remain enrolled after the date by which they may drop the course without financial penalty. HCON 
measures student population in terms of student enrollments. Student enrollment represents the number of students enrolled in 
one or more courses after the date by which they may drop the course without financial penalty.

Course enrollments, or net course registrations, at APUS represent the aggregate number of courses in which students remain 
enrolled after the date by which they may drop the course without financial penalty.

Because we recognize revenues over the length of a course, net course registrations in a financial reporting period do not 
correlate directly with revenues for that period because revenues recognized from courses are not necessarily recognized in 
the financial reporting period in which the course registrations occur. For example, revenues in a quarter reflect a portion of 
the revenue from courses that began in a prior quarter and continued into the quarter, all revenue from courses that began and 
ended in the quarter, and a portion of the revenue from courses that began but did not end in the quarter.

In recent years, in part because our students can access Title IV programs, APUS has been increasing its focus on public safety 
professionals and other civilian markets. Title IV programs require participating students to take more courses per semester 
than students participating in DoD tuition assistance programs. As a result, we expect that our increased focus on markets that 
utilize Title IV programs may cause the average number of courses per student per semester to increase.

106

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.While we have experienced substantial growth in some recent periods, you should not rely on the results of any prior periods as 
an indication of our future growth in net course registrations at APUS, student enrollments at HCON, or consolidated revenue, 
as we do not expect that our historical growth rates are sustainable. Similarly, you should not rely on our operating margins in 
any prior periods as an indication of our future operating margins.

Tuition rate. Providing affordable programs is an important element of our strategy for growth. Since 2000, APUS has not 
raised undergraduate tuition and has only increased graduate tuition by modest amounts in 2007, 2010 and 2011. However, 
APUS is planning a tuition increase in the second half of 2015, including to support further improvements in the online learning 
experience and other initiatives aimed at improving student success. The tuition increase for graduate and undergraduate 
tuition is anticipated to be in the range of 5% to 8%. To support its active duty military students, APUS will continue providing a 
tuition grant that will keep the cost of tuition for those students at approximately its current level. In 2016, we also expect to 
evaluate repositioning select degree programs by implementing differentiated pricing, primarily to better align tuition of certain 
programs with higher market demand. APUS expects to continue to focus on offering affordable programs. Tuition, fees and 
books at HCON are also designed to be affordable and competitive with other similar institutions offering the same level of 
flexibility, accessibility and student experience.

Net tuition. Tuition revenues vary from period to period based on the aggregate number of students attending classes and the 
number of classes they are attending during the period, the mix of programs that students are attending during the period, as 
well as the number of students starting classes each month during the period and the timing of the start of a class each month 
or term. Tuition revenue is adjusted to reflect amounts for students who withdraw from a course in the month or term the 
withdrawal occurs. We also provide scholarships to certain students to assist them financially with their educational goals. The 
cost of these scholarships is netted against tuition revenue in the period incurred for purposes of establishing net tuition 
revenue. Scholarships typically represent less than 1% of revenues.

Other fees. Other fees at APUS include charges for transcript credit evaluation, which includes assistance in securing official 
transcripts on behalf of the student and evaluating transcripts for transfer credit, and a technology fee per course. APUS 
students are also charged withdrawal, graduation, late registration, transcript request and comprehensive examination fees, 
when applicable. APUS provides a grant to cover the technology fee for students using DoD tuition assistance programs or VA 
education benefits. For the year ended December 31, 2014, technology fee revenue was approximately $7.4 million, or 2.2% of 
revenue. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605-50, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration 
Received from a Vendor, other fees also include book purchase commissions that APUS receives for graduate student book 
purchases and ancillary supply purchases that students make directly from our preferred book vendor. HCON students are 
charged application, enrollment, and graduation fees, when applicable.

Costs and Expenses

We categorize our costs and expenses as (i) instructional costs and services, (ii) selling and promotional, (iii) general and 
administrative, and (iv) depreciation and amortization.

Instructional costs and services. Instructional costs and services are expenses directly attributable to the educational 
services we provide our students. This expense category includes salaries and benefits for full-time faculty, administrators  
and academic advisors, and costs associated with part-time faculty. Instructional costs and services expenses also includes 
costs associated with academic records and graduation, as well as other services provided by our institutions, such as 
evaluating transcripts.

107

FORM 10-KAt APUS, instructional costs and services also includes expenses related to our undergraduate book grant program and 
instructional pay for part-time faculty that is primarily dependent on the number of students taught. Beginning with the year 
ended December 31, 2014, instructional costs and services also includes operating expenses directly associated with HCON’s 
campus operations.

Selling and promotional. Selling and promotional expenses include salaries and benefits of personnel engaged in recruitment 
and promotion, as well as costs associated with advertising and the production of marketing materials related to both new 
enrollments and current students. Our selling and promotional expenses are generally affected by the cost of advertising media, 
the efficiency of our selling efforts, salaries and benefits for our selling and admissions personnel, and the number of advertising 
initiatives for new and existing academic programs. We believe the availability of Title IV program funds to students has 
increased our marketability in non-military markets, but the nature of these markets and the rising cost of internet and other 
advertising has caused our student acquisition costs to increase. As we continue to focus on students outside of public service 
communities who use Title IV funds, this trend may continue and our student acquisition costs may increase.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses include salaries and benefits of employees engaged in 
corporate management, finance, information technology, human resources, facilities, compliance and other corporate functions. 
In addition, the cost of renting and maintaining APUS facilities, technology expenses, and costs for professional services are 
included in general and administrative costs. General and administrative expenses also include bad debt expense.

Depreciation and amortization. We incur depreciation and amortization expenses for costs related to the capitalization of 
property, equipment, software and program development on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. 
In addition, we incur depreciation and amortization expenses for the amortization of identified intangible assets with a definite 
life resulting from our acquisition of HCON on November 1, 2013.

Interest Income, Net

Interest income, net consists primarily of interest income earned on our notes receivable and on cash and cash equivalents, net 
of any interest expense.

Equity Investment Loss, Net of Tax

Equity investment loss, net of tax consists primarily of our proportional share of after-tax earnings or losses attributable to our 
investments in certain companies. We use the equity method of accounting for an investment in a company in which our 
ownership is 20% or greater but less than or equal to 50% or when we have the ability to exercise significant influence over 
operating and financial policies of the investment. We refer to these companies as investees.

Under the equity method, our investments in and amounts due to and from an investee are included in the consolidated balance 
sheets. Our share of the investee’s earnings or losses are included in the consolidated statement of income as equity invest-
ment income (loss), net of tax. Dividends, cash distributions, loans or other cash received from the investee, additional cash 
investments, loan repayments or other cash paid to the investee are included in the consolidated statement of cash flows. 
Additionally, when circumstances warrant, the carrying value of investments accounted for using the equity method of account-
ing are adjusted downward to reflect any other-than-temporary declines in value.

As of December 31, 2014, our equity method investments include an approximate 19.9% investment in preferred stock of 
NWHW Holdings, Inc., or NWHW Holdings, a holding company that operates New Horizons Worldwide, Inc., an investment in 
preferred stock of Fidelis Education, Inc., or Fidelis, representing approximately 21.6% of its fully diluted equity, and investment 
in preferred stock of Second Avenue Software, Inc., or Second Avenue Software, representing approximately 25.9% of its fully 

108

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.diluted equity. In connection with these investments, we are entitled to certain rights, including the right to representation on 
the Boards of Directors of NWHW Holdings, Fidelis Education, and Second Avenue Software.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been 
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. During the preparation of 
these financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, 
liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assump-
tions, including those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of 
long-lived assets, contingencies, income taxes and stock-based compensation expense. We base our estimates on historical 
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results of our 
analysis form the basis for making assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent 
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and the impact of 
such differences may be material to our consolidated financial statements.

A summary of our critical accounting policies follows:

Revenue recognition. The company records all tuition as deferred revenue when a student begins a class, in the case of 
APUS, or starts a term, in the case of HCON. At the beginning of each class or term, revenue is recognized on a pro rata basis 
over the period of the class or term, which is, for APUS, either an eight- or sixteen-week period and for HCON, a quarterly term. 
This results in deferred revenue on the Company’s balance sheet that includes future revenues that have not yet been earned 
for classes and terms that are in progress.

Revenue Recognition—American Public University System

APUS’s tuition revenues vary from period to period based on the number of net course registrations. Students may remit tuition 
payments through the online registration process at any time or they may elect various payment options, including payments by 
sponsors, alternative loans, financial aid, or the DoD tuition assistance program which remits payments directly to APUS. These 
other payment options can delay the receipt of payment up until the class starts or longer, resulting in the recording of a 
receivable from the student and deferred revenue at the beginning of each session. Tuition revenue for sessions in progress that 
has not been earned by APUS is presented as deferred revenue in the accompanying balance sheet.

APUS refunds 100% of tuition for courses that are dropped by students before the conclusion of the first seven days of a course. 
Because courses begin the first Monday of every month and penalty free drops occur by the second Monday of every month, we 
do not recognize revenue for dropped courses. After a course begins, if a student does not drop the course within the first seven 
days, the following refund policy is used:

8-Week Course—Tuition Refund Schedule

Withdrawal Request Date

Before or During Week 1
During Week 2
During Weeks 3 and 4
During Weeks 5 through 8

Tuition Refund Percentage

100%
  75%
  50%
No Refund

109

FORM 10-K16-Week Course—Tuition Refund Schedule

Withdrawal Request Date

Before or During Week 1
During Week 2
During Weeks 3 and 4
During Weeks 5 through 8
During Weeks 9 through 16

Tuition Refund Percentage

100%
100%
  75%
  50%
No Refund

Additional refund policies may apply to students of certain states in accordance with specific state and other local requirements.

APUS recognizes revenue on a pro rata basis over the period of its courses as APUS completes the tasks entitling it to the 
benefits represented by such revenue. If a student withdraws during the academic term, APUS recognizes as revenue the 
remaining non-refundable amount due from the student in the period the withdrawal occurs. The calculation of the remaining 
non-refundable amount is based upon the APUS student refund policy. For those students who have an outstanding receivable 
balance at the date of withdrawal, APUS assesses collectability and only recognizes as revenue those amounts where collect-
ability is reasonably assured based on APUS’s history with similar student accounts. This policy was implemented on January 1, 
2015. Prior to this, APUS recognized revenue for all student withdrawals and established an allowance for those receivables 
considered uncollectible. The Company does not believe that this change in policy will have a material effect on its results of 
operations or financial condition.

Other revenue includes charges for transcript credit evaluation, which includes assistance in securing official transcripts on 
behalf of the student in addition to evaluating transcripts for transfer credit, and a technology fee per course. APUS provides a 
grant to cover the technology fee for students using DoD tuition assistance programs or VA education benefits. Students also 
are charged withdrawal, graduation, late registration, transcript request and comprehensive examination fees, when applicable. 
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605-50, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received 
from a Vendor, other fees also include book purchase commissions APUS receives for graduate student book purchases and 
ancillary supply purchases students make directly from APUS’s preferred book vendor.

Revenue Recognition—Hondros College of Nursing

HCON’s tuition revenues vary from period to period based on the number of students enrolled. HCON students may remit tuition 
payments at any time, or they may elect various payment options that can delay receipt of payment up until the term starts or 
longer. These other payment options include payments by sponsors, financial aid, alternative loans, or payment plan options. If 
one of the various other payment options are confirmed as secured, the student is allowed to start the term. Students have 
access to their account statements on the student portal prior to the start of the term. Sponsor invoices are prepared and sent 
according to their billing terms. All financial aid is awarded prior to the start of the term and requests for authorization of 
disbursement begin in the first week of the term. Tuition revenue for the term in progress that has not been earned by HCON is 
presented as deferred revenue in the accompanying balance sheet.

HCON refund policy complies with the rules of the Ohio State Board of Career Colleges and Schools and is applicable to each 
term. For a course with an on-campus or other in-person component, the date of withdrawal is determined by a student’s last 
attended day of clinical offering, laboratory session, or lecture. For an online course, the date of withdrawal is determined by a 
student’s last submitted assignment in the course. HCON uses the following refund policy:

110

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Withdrawal Request Date

Before first full calendar week of the quarter
During first full calendar week of the quarter
During second full calendar week of the quarter
During third full calendar week of the quarter
During fourth full week of the quarter

Tuition Refund Percentage

100%, plus registration fee
75%, plus registration fee
50%, plus registration fee
25%, plus registration fee
No Refund

Additional refund policies may apply to students of certain states in accordance with specific state and other local regulations.

Accounts receivable. Course tuition is recorded as accounts receivable and deferred revenue at the time students begin a 
class or term. Students may remit tuition payments at any time or they may elect various payment options, which can delay the 
receipt of payment up until the class or term starts or longer. These other payment options include payments by sponsors, 
financial aid, alternative loans, payment plan options, or tuition assistance programs that remit payments directly to us. When a 
student remits payment after a class or term has begun, accounts receivable is reduced. If payment is made prior to the start of 
a class or term, the payment is recorded as a student deposit, and the student is provided access to the online classroom when 
classes start, in the case of APUS, or allowed to start the term, in the case of HCON. If one of the various other payment options 
are confirmed as secured, the student is provided access to the online classroom or allowed to start the term. If no receipt is 
confirmed or payment option secured, the student will be dropped from the online class or not allowed to start the term. 
Therefore, billed amounts represent charges that have been prepared and sent to students or the applicable third party payor 
according to the terms agreed upon in advance.

DoD tuition assistance programs are billed by branch of service on a course-by-course basis when a student starts class, 
whereas Title IV programs are billed based on the classes included in a student’s semester. Billed accounts receivable are 
considered past due if the invoice has been outstanding for more than 30 days. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on 
management’s evaluation of the status of existing accounts receivable. Among other factors, management considers the age of 
the receivable, the anticipated source of payment and the company’s historical allowance considerations. Consideration is also 
given to any specific known risk areas among the existing accounts receivable balances. Recoveries of receivables previously 
written off are recorded when received. We do not charge interest on our past due accounts receivable.

Property and equipment. All property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation, except the acquired 
assets of HCON, which were recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. Depreciation and amortization are calculated on a 
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Our proprietary system, Partnership At a Distance TM, or PAD, 
is a customized student information and services system used by APUS to manage admissions, online orientation, course 
registrations, tuition payments, grade reporting, progress toward degrees, and various other functions. Costs associated with 
the system have been capitalized in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software 
Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, and classified as property and equipment. These costs are amortized over the estimated 
useful life of five years. The Company also capitalizes certain costs for academic program development. These costs are 
transferred to property and equipment upon completion of each program and amortized over an estimated life not to exceed 
three years.

Investments. On September 30, 2012, the Company made a $6.8 million investment in preferred stock of NWHW Holdings, Inc. 
or NWHW Holdings, a holding company which operates New Horizons Worldwide Inc., or New Horizons, representing approxi-
mately 19.9% of the fully diluted equity of NWHW Holdings. New Horizons is a global IT training company operating over 300 
locations around the world through franchise arrangements in 45 states and 70 countries. In connection with the investment, 
the Company is entitled to certain rights, including the right to representation on the Board of Directors of NWHW Holdings. The 

111

FORM 10-KCompany accounts for its investment in NWHW Holdings under the equity method of accounting. Therefore, the Company 
recorded the investment at cost and recognizes its share of earnings or losses in the investee in the periods for which they are 
reported with a corresponding adjustment in the carrying amount of the investment.

On February 20, 2013, the Company made a $4.0 million investment in preferred stock of Fidelis Education, Inc., or Fidelis 
Education, representing approximately 21.6% of its fully diluted equity. Fidelis Education is developing a learning relationship 
management system that will assist working adult students with education advising and career mentoring services as they 
pursue college degrees. In connection with the investment, the Company is entitled to certain rights, including the right to 
representation on the Board of Directors of Fidelis Education. The Company accounts for its investment in Fidelis Education 
under the equity method of accounting. Therefore, the Company recorded the investment at cost and will recognize its share of 
earnings or losses in the investee in the periods for which they are reported with a corresponding adjustment in the carrying 
amount of the investment.

On April 2, 2014, the Company made a $1.5 million investment in preferred stock of Second Avenue Software, Inc., or Second 
Avenue Software, representing approximately 25.9% of its fully diluted equity. Second Avenue Software is a game-based 
education software company that develops software on a proprietary and “work-for-hire” basis. In connection with the invest-
ment, the Company is entitled to certain rights, including the right to representation on the Board of Directors. The Company 
accounts for its investment in Second Avenue Software under the equity method of accounting. Therefore, the Company 
recorded the investment at cost and will recognize its share of earnings or losses in the investee in the periods for which they 
are reported with a corresponding adjustment in the carrying amount of the investment.

Note Receivable. In connection with the Company’s minority investment in NWHW Holdings, Inc., we extended $6.0 million in 
credit to New Horizons in exchange for a subordinated note. On December 16, 2014, New Horizons prepaid the $6.0 million loan 
we made in connection with the investment transaction, including pro rata interest owed.

We evaluate loans receivable by analyzing the borrower’s creditworthiness, cash flows and financial status, and the condition and 
estimated value of the collateral. We consider a loan to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, we believe 
it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.

Income taxes. Deferred taxes are determined using the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for 
deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary 
differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. As those differences 
reverse, they will enter into the determination of future taxable income. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation 
allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will 
not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of 
enactment of such changes.

Stock-based compensation. Prior to 2012, the Company used a mix of stock options and restricted stock, but since 2011, the 
Company has not issued stock options. We apply FASB ASC Topic 718, Share-Based Payment, which requires the measurement 
and recognition of compensation expense for stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including 
employee stock options.

Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock grants is expensed over the vesting period using the straight-
line method for Company employees and the graded-vesting method for members of the Board of Directors, and is measured 
using APEI’s stock price on the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is estimated at the date of grant using a 
Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses certain assumptions which have been noted in “Financial Statements and 

112

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Supplementary Data—Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Stockholders’ Equity.” Prior to 2012, the Company 
calculated the expected term of stock option awards using the “simplified method” in accordance with Securities and 
Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletins No. 107 and 110 because the Company lacked historical data and was unable 
to make reasonable assumptions regarding the future. The Company also estimates forfeitures of share-based awards at the 
time of grant and revises such estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from original projections. The 
Company makes assumptions with respect to expected stock price volatility based on the average historical volatility of the 
stock prices of peers with similar attributes. In addition, the Company determines the risk free interest rate by selecting the 
U.S. Treasury five-year constant maturity, quoted on an investment basis in effect at the time of grant for that business day. 
Estimates of fair value are subjective and are not intended to predict actual future events, and subsequent events are not 
indicative of the reasonableness of the original estimates of fair value made under FASB ASC Topic 718.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired 
business over the amount assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible 
asset are assessed at least annually for impairment, or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change between 
annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the respective reporting unit below its carrying amount. 
Under Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, the 
Company is permitted, but not required, to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the 
quantitative goodwill impairment test.

Our goodwill and other intangibles by reportable segment are summarized below (in thousands):

American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment(1)
Total

Annual 
Impairment  
Test Date

N/A
10/31/2014

Goodwill as of December 31,

Other Intangibles as of December 31,

2013

$      —
  38,148
$38,148

2014

$      —
  38,634
$38,634

2013

$    —
$8,082
$8,082

2014

$    —
$8,082
$8,082

(1)  Effective November 1, 2013, we acquired HCON which resulted in recognition of $38.6 million of goodwill and $8.1 million in other identifiable 

intangibles assets. Additional information regarding the recognition of goodwill related to the HCON acquisition is contained in Notes 2 and 11 
of our “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” A goodwill impairment test was conducted on October 31, 2014. We currently intend to 
test goodwill for impairment on each anniversary date of the acquisition.

Valuation of long-lived assets. We account for the valuation of long-lived assets under FASB ASC Topic 360, Accounting for 
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. FASB ASC Topic 360 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable 
intangible assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount 
of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the long-lived asset is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount 
of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be 
impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the 
estimated fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reportable at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value, less 
costs to sell.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). The 
standard is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner to depict the 
transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for 
those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after 
December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Accordingly, the standard will only be effective for us for periods 

113

FORM 10-Kbeginning on or after January 1, 2017. We will evaluate the impact that the standard will have on our financial condition, results 
of operations, and disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going 
Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”). The standard requires management to evaluate, at each interim and annual reporting period, whether 
there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one 
year after the date the financial statements are issued, and provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual 
periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter, and early adoption is permitted. We do 
not expect to early adopt ASU 2014-15, which will be effective for us for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, and we do 
not believe the standard will have a material impact on our financial statements.

Results of Operations
We acquired HCON on November 1, 2013, and therefore our consolidated results for periods prior to November 1, 2013 do not 
include any results from HCON, while periods after the date of HCON’s acquisition include HCON’s results.

The following table sets forth statements of operations data as a percentage of revenues for each of the periods indicated:

Revenues
Costs and expenses:

Instructional costs and services
Selling and promotional
General and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Total costs and expenses

Income from operations before interest income and income taxes
Interest income, net
Income from operations before income taxes
Income tax expense
Equity investment loss, net of taxes
Net income

2012

100.0%

2013

100.0%

2014

100.0%

35.2%
19.1%
20.3%
3.5%
78.1%
21.9%
—%
21.9%
8.5%
—%
13.4%

34.2%
19.9%
21.3%
4.1%
79.5%
20.5%
0.1%
20.6%
7.8%
—%
12.8%

35.4%
19.8%
21.3%
4.6%
81.1%
18.9%
0.1%
19.0%
7.2%
(0.1)%
11.9%

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

Revenues

Our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $350.0 million, an increase of $20.5 million or 6.2%, 
compared to $329.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was the result of the inclusion of the results of 
the HCON Segment for the year ended December 31, 2014, partially offset by decreased revenue in our APEI Segment due to a 
decrease in net course registrations.

APEI Segment net course registrations, which include one-credit lab courses combined with their related three-credit course, 
decreased to approximately 404,000 in the year ended December 31, 2014 from approximately 409,700 in the year ended 
December 31, 2013, a decrease of approximately 1.4%. We believe that the decrease in the APEI Segment’s net course registra-
tions for the year ended December 31, 2014 was primarily attributable to uncertainty in the military market accompanied by 

114

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.increased competition for students, as well as to a more targeted and narrower geographical approach to marketing that was 
intended to attract students with greater college readiness. We believe that continued uncertainty regarding the availability of 
DoD’s tuition assistance programs and the impact from the October 2013 temporary suspension of such programs may have 
negatively impacted our net course registrations during 2014. For more information on the impact of the temporary suspensions 
of DoD’s tuition assistance programs please refer to “Overview” above.

Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses were $284.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $22.1 million, or 8.4%, compared 
to $262.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase was primarily the result of the inclusion of the results of 
the HCON Segment for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the specific factors discussed below.

Costs and expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 81.1% in the year ended December 31, 2014 from 79.5% in the 
year ended December 31, 2013. Similarly, our income before interest income and income taxes, or our operating margin, 
decreased to 18.9% from 20.5% over that same period. Our costs and expenses as a percentage of revenue increased due to 
the inclusion of the operating results of the HCON Segment, which has higher costs and expenses as a percentage of revenue 
than our APEI Segment largely because HCON offers the majority of its courses at physical campuses, which have a higher cost 
structure than courses delivered fully online, and also due to the specific factors discussed below.

Instructional costs and services. Instructional costs and services expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 were 
$123.8 million, an increase of $11.0 million, or 9.8%, compared to $112.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. 
Instructional costs and services expenses as a percentage of revenues were 35.4% for the year ended December 31, 2014, 
compared to 34.2% for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in instructional costs and services expenses was 
primarily the result of the inclusion of the results of the HCON Segment for the year ended December 31, 2014, partially offset 
by decreases in instructional costs and services expenses in our APEI Segment as the result of lower net course registrations. 
For the year ended December 31, 2014, instructional costs and services expenses include campus-level operating expenses for 
the HCON Segment.

Selling and promotional. Selling and promotional expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $69.2 million, an 
increase of $3.5 million, or 5.3%, compared to $65.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase was due to 
increased advertising expenses in our APEI Segment and the inclusion of the results of the HCON Segment for the year ended 
December 31, 2014. Selling and promotional expenses as a percentage of revenues were 19.8% for the year ended 
December 31, 2014 and 19.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013. Selling and promotional expenses as a percentage of 
revenues were largely unchanged year over year due to higher spending in our APEI Segment offset by our HCON Segment 
which spends less on such expenses as a percentage of revenue than our APEI Segment.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $75.1 million, 
an increase of $5.0 million, or 7.1% compared to $70.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in general and 
administrative expenses was primarily a result of the inclusion of the results of the HCON Segment for the year ended 
December 31, 2014, and increases in salary expenses and bad debt expense in our APEI Segment. General and administrative 
expenses as a percentage of revenues were 21.3% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Bad debt expense increased to $19.2 million, or approximately 5.5% of revenue, in the year ended December 31, 2014, from 
$14.3 million, or approximately 4.3% of revenue, in the year ended December 31, 2013. We believe the increase in bad debt 
expense is primarily due to non-military students in our APEI Segment utilizing funds from Title IV programs and not completing 
their academic period, resulting in a return of federal student aid and a resulting unpaid balance due directly from the student, 

115

FORM 10-Kwhich in turn can result in bad debt. For further information regarding our accounting policies for the students discussed in the 
previous sentence, please refer to “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates” above.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $16.1 million for the year ended December 31, 
2014, compared to $13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, or an increase of 19.3%. This increase resulted from 
greater capital expenditures and higher depreciation and amortization on a larger fixed-asset base in our APEI Segment, and the 
inclusion of the results of the HCON Segment for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation included in instructional costs and services, selling and promotional, 
and general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $5.4 million in the aggregate, representing 
an increase of $1.4 million, or 33.4%, compared to $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase resulted 
primarily from a higher number of employees being eligible for stock-based compensation.

The table below reflects our stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of income for the 
years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 (in thousands):

Instructional costs and services
Selling and promotional
General and administrative
Total stock-based compensation expense

Income Tax Expense

Year Ended December 31,

2013

$   876
444
2,704
$4,024

2014

$1,274
568
3,527
$5,369

We recognized tax expense from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 of $25.1 million and 
$25.6 million, respectively, or effective tax rates of 38.0% and 37.9%, respectively.

Net Income

Net income was $40.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to net income of $42.0 million for the year ended 
December 31, 2013, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 2.6%. This decrease was related to the factors discussed above.

116

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Operating Results by Reportable Segment—Year Ended December 31, 2014  
Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013
The table below details our operating results by reportable segment for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2013

2014

$ Change

% Change

Revenue

American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment

Total Revenue
Income from continuing operations before interest income 

and income taxes
American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment

$325,678
3,801
$329,479

$319,879
30,141
$350,020

$(5,799)
26,340
$20,541

$67,161
276

$62,499
3,333

$(4,662)
3,057

Total income from continuing operations before interest 

income and income taxes

$67,437

$65,832

$(1,605)

(2)%
—
6%

(7)%
—

(2)%

APEI Segment

For the year ended December 31, 2014, our APEI Segment earned approximately $319.9 million in revenues, a $5.8 million, or 
1.8%, decrease as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, which is primarily attributable to lower net course registra-
tions. Income from continuing operations before interest income and income taxes was approximately $62.5 million for the year 
ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $4.7 million, or 6.9%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 as a result of the 
decrease in net course registrations and increases in general and administrative expenses and in selling and promotional 
expenses partially offset by a decrease in instructional costs and services expenses. For information regarding the APEI 
Segment’s net course registrations please refer to “Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 
2013—Revenues” above.

HCON Segment

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the HCON Segment earned $30.1 million in revenues and $3.3 million in income from 
continuing operations before interest income and income taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we reported $3.8 million 
in revenues from our HCON Segment and $0.3 million in income from continuing operations before interest income and income 
taxes. The increases in revenue and income from continuing operations before interest income and income taxes for the year 
ended December 31, 2014 is a result of including the results of the HCON Segment for the entire year.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

Revenues

Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $329.5 million, an increase of $16.0 million, or 5.1%, compared to 
$313.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily the result of higher net course registrations in 
our APEI Segment. Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 also included $3.8 million in revenues earned by our HCON 
Segment following its acquisition on November 1, 2013.

APEI Segment net course registrations, which include one-credit lab courses combined with their related three-credit course, 
increased to approximately 409,700 in the year ended December 31, 2013 from approximately 402,200 in the year ended 

117

FORM 10-KDecember 31, 2012, an increase of approximately 1.9%. The increase in net course registrations was primarily attributable to 
increased marketing efforts to non-military students interested in the affordability and diversity of our academic programs, and 
to some degree as a result of students who enrolled solely to obtain funds from Title IV programs and some students who might 
not otherwise pursue a degree or certificate but are attracted to enroll in our programs because of the availability of these 
funds and economic hardships resulting from today’s economic climate. We believe that net course registrations and revenues in 
the second and fourth quarters of the year ended December 31, 2013 were negatively impacted, in part, by the temporary 
suspensions of DoD tuition assistance programs in March and October 2013, resulting in fewer enrollments and less tuition 
revenue from service members than otherwise would have been anticipated.

Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses were $262.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $17.4 million, or 7.1%, compared 
to $244.7 million for prior year ended December 31, 2012. This increase was due to the specific factors discussed below. Costs 
and expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 79.5% in 2013 from 78.1% in 2012. Similarly, our income before interest 
income and income taxes, or our operating margin, decreased to 20.5% from 21.9% over that same period. This increase in 
costs and expenses as a percentage of revenues and decrease in operating margins resulted from the factors described below. 
Overall, our costs and expenses as a percentage of revenue increased primarily as a result of increases in selling and promo-
tional expenses attributable to higher advertising costs and costs associated with attracting non-military students, and an 
increase in general and administrative expenses related to higher expenditures for information technology, as well as slowing 
revenue growth due, in part, to the temporary suspension of DoD tuition assistance programs in March and October 2013. Costs 
and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 also included expenses incurred by our HCON Segment following its 
acquisition on November 1, 2013.

Instructional costs and services. Instructional costs and services expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were 
$112.8 million, an increase of $2.6 million, or 2.4%, compared to $110.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. This 
increase was directly related to an increase in the number of course sections offered due to the increase in net course registra-
tions in our APEI Segment. Instructional costs and services expense as a percentage of revenues decreased to 34.2% for the 
year ended December 31, 2013 from 35.2% for year ended December 31, 2012. This decrease was primarily due to the number of 
full-time academic support staff at APUS increasing at a slower rate than revenue, and lower textbook costs.

Selling and promotional. Selling and promotional expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $65.7 million, an 
increase of $5.9 million, or 9.9% compared to $59.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase was primarily 
due to an increase in the cost of internet and other advertising in our APEI Segment. Selling and promotional expenses as a 
percentage of revenues increased to 19.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013 from 19.1% for the year ended December 31, 
2012 due to an increase in the cost of internet and other advertising, as well as slowing revenue growth due, in part, to the 
temporary suspension of DoD tuition assistance programs in March and October 2013.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $70.1 million, 
an increase of $6.5 million, or 10.2%, compared to $63.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in expendi-
tures was primarily due to costs associated with an increase in non-military students and increased expenditures for informa-
tion technology in our APEI Segment. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 21.3% for 
the year ended December 31, 2013 from 20.3% for the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase was primarily due to costs 
associated with an increase in non-military students and slowing revenue growth in our APEI Segment due, in part, to the 
temporary suspension of DoD tuition assistance programs in March and October 2013.

Bad debt expense increased to $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $13.6 million for the year ended 
December 31, 2012, or approximately 4.3% of revenue in both years. The increase in bad debt expense is due to non-military 

118

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.students that utilize funds from Title IV programs and that do not complete their academic period, resulting in a return of federal 
student aid and a resulting unpaid balance due directly from the student, which in turn can result in bad debt.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 
2013, or an increase of 21.6% as compared to $11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase resulted from 
greater capital expenditures and higher depreciation and amortization on a larger fixed asset base that included, among other 
items, an increase in expenses related to a new administrative facility constructed in 2012.

Stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation included in instructional costs and services, selling and promotional, 
and general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $4.0 million in the aggregate, representing 
an increase of 33.4% from $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in stock-based compensation 
expense is primarily attributable to an increase in new restricted stock grants.

The table below reflects our stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of income for the 
years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 (in thousands):

Instructional costs and services
Selling and promotional
General and administrative
Total stock-based compensation expense

Income Tax Expense

Year Ended December 31,

2012

$   896
378
2,544
$3,818

2013

$   876
444
2,704
$4,024

We recognized tax expense from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 of $25.6 million and 
$26.5 million, respectively, or effective tax rates of 37.9% and 38.5%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate was 
due to the tax benefit of stock options exercised in 2013.

Net Income

Net income was $42.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to net income of $42.3 million for the year ended 
December 31, 2012, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 0.7%. This decrease was related to the factors discussed above.

119

FORM 10-KOperating Results by Reportable Segment—Year Ended December 31, 2013  
Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

The table below details our operating results by reportable segment for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2013

$ Change

% Change

Revenue

American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment

Total Revenue
Income from continuing operations before interest income 

and income taxes
American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment

$313,516
—
$313,516

$325,678
3,801
$329,479

$  12,162
3,801
$  15,963

$  68,802
—

$  67,161
276

$(1,641.0)
276

Total income from continuing operations before interest 

income and income taxes

$  68,802

$  67,437

$   (1,365)

4%
—
5%

(2)%
—

(2)%

APEI Segment

For the year ended December 31, 2013 the APEI Segment earned approximately $325.7 million in revenues, a 3.9% increase as 
compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, which was primarily attributable to higher net course registrations. Income 
from continuing operations before interest income and income taxes was approximately $67.2 million, a decrease of $1.6 million, 
or 2.4% as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the APEI Segment’s expenses increasing at a faster 
rate than revenue as well as slowing revenue growth due, in part, to the temporary suspension of DoD tuition assistance 
programs in March and October 2013. For information regarding the APEI Segment’s net course registrations please refer to 
“Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012—Revenues” above.

HCON Segment

Our HCON segment reflects the operations of HCON, which was acquired effective November 1, 2013. We did not consolidate 
the financial results of the segment prior to this date.

120

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Quarterly Results

The following table presents our unaudited quarterly results of operations for each of our eight last quarters prior to 
December 31, 2014. You should read the following table in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related 
notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. We have prepared the unaudited information on the same basis as our 
audited consolidated financial statements. Results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any 
future quarters or for a full year (in thousands).

(Unaudited)

Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues
Costs and expenses:
Instructional costs and services
Selling and promotional
General and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Total costs and expenses
Income before taxes
Interest income, net
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense (benefit)
Investment income (loss),  

net of taxes

Net income

Other Data:
Stock-based compensation
Net cash provided by  
operating activities
Capital expenditures
APUS Net course registrations

March 31, 
2013

June 30, 
2013

Sept. 30, 
2013

Dec. 31, 
2013

March 31, 
2014

June 30, 
2014

Sept. 30, 
2014

Dec. 31, 
2014

Quarter Ended

$83,840

$80,925

$81,777

$82,937

$88,553

$85,463

$84,707

$91,297

28,405
16,539
17,479
3,207
65,630
18,210
64
18,274
6,850

27,207
16,045
17,158
3,312
63,722
17,203
88
17,291
6,543

28,139
15,989
16,766
3,376
64,270
17,507
77
17,584
6,612

29,033
17,114
18,660
3,613
68,420
14,517
80
14,597
5,640

31,348
17,067
19,524
3,889
71,828
16,725
81
16,806
6,327

30,197
16,982
18,491
3,958
69,628
15,835
98
15,933
6,173

30,626
17,948
17,432
4,054
70,060
14,647
98
14,745
5,877

31,594
17,232
19,626
4,220
72,672
18,625
84
18,709
6,773

$     (48)
$11,376

$        2
$10,750

$     (61)
$10,911

$      40
$  8,997

$      43
$10,436

$     (42)
$  9,802

$      26
$  8,842

$    139
$11,797

$  1,015

$    968

$  1,022

$  1,019

$  1,156

$  1,267

$  1,267

$  1,679

$20,603
$  5,947
109,700

$14,037
$  4,974
99,500

$19,559
$  4,172
105,200

$  5,215
$  5,556
95,400

$12,449
$  4,612
105,800

$  9,776
$  4,603
96,100

$24,945
$  6,043
100,200

$13,860
$  9,338
101,800

Liquidity and Capital Resources
We financed our operating activities and capital expenditures during the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 
primarily through cash provided by operating activities. Cash and cash equivalents were $115.6 million and $94.8 million at 
December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, representing an increase of $20.8 million, or 22.0%, during the year 
ended December 31, 2014. Cash and cash equivalents were $114.9 million at December 31, 2012. The $20.1 million decrease in 
cash, or a decrease of 17.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2013 was largely due to our purchase of HCON on November 1, 
2013, partially offset by cash provided by operating activities.

In the year ended December 31, 2014, we used cash to repurchase stock and for our minority investment in Second Avenue 
Software, while in the year ended December 31, 2013, we used cash to repurchase stock and for our minority investment in 
Fidelis Education.

121

FORM 10-KWe derive a significant portion of our revenues from our participation in Title IV programs, for which disbursements are gov-
erned by federal regulations. We have typically received disbursements under Title IV programs within 30 days of the start of 
the applicable class. Another significant source of revenue for our APEI Segment is derived from tuition assistance programs 
from the DoD. Generally, these funds are received within 60 days of the start of the classes to which they relate. These factors, 
together with the number of classes starting each month, affect our operating cash flow.

Our costs and expenses have increased due to changes in the composition of our student body, increased overhead, and the 
acquisition and operation of HCON. We expect to continue to fund these costs and expenses through cash generated from 
operations. Based on our current level of operations, we believe that our cash flow from operations and other sources of 
liquidity, including cash and cash equivalents, will provide adequate funds for ongoing operations and planned capital expendi-
tures for the foreseeable future. We may need additional capital, however, in connection with any change in our current level of 
operations, including were we to pursue significant business acquisitions or investment opportunities, or determine to make 
other significant investments in our business.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $61.0 million, $59.4 million and $52.9 million for the years ended December 31, 
2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The increase in cash flow in operations in 2014 was primarily the result of the consolidation 
of HCON, which was acquired effective November 1, 2013, primarily offset by lower income. The increase in cash flow from 
operations in the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily due to timing differences related to the remittance of tuition 
assistance payments by the DoD in 2012 and 2013, which decreased accounts receivable in the year ended December 31, 2013.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $21.3 million, $69.2 million and $48.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 
2013, and 2012 respectively. The differences in cash used in investing activities is primarily related to differing amounts of funds 
being used each year to fund acquisitions and capital expenditures.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, cash used in investing activities for capital expenditures was primarily related to the 
following within our APEI segment: software development; on-going software development related to Partnership At a 
Distance; our customized student information and services system; buildings to support our operations; and computers and 
equipment to support staff. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2014, our APEI Segment made a $1.5 million equity 
investment in Second Avenue Software, which is offset by New Horizons’ prepayment of the $6.0 million loan we made in 
connection with our investment in that company.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, our APEI Segment made a $4.0 million equity investment in Fidelis Education, and 
purchased HCON for an adjusted purchase price of approximately $47 million. In the year ended December 31, 2012 we incurred 
higher capital expenditures related to the expansion of our facilities and technology as a result of our then rapid growth.

We expect that we will continue to make investments related to strategic opportunities and to enhance our business capabilities, 
such as our investments in New Horizons, Fidelis Education and Second Avenue Software. Capital expenditures could be higher in 
the future as a result of the acquisition or lease of existing structures or potential new construction projects and necessary tenant 
improvements that arise as a result of our ongoing evaluation of our space needs and opportunities for physical growth, and as a 
result of expenditures on technology and other business capabilities. We also expect that in the future capital expenditures in our 
HCON Segment may be higher as a percentage of revenue than those in our APEI Segment as a result of investments related to 
HCON’s physical classroom operations. We will continue to explore opportunities to invest in the education industry, which could 
include purchasing or investing in other education-related companies or companies developing new technologies.

122

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $18.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $10.2 million and 
$8.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in cash used in financing activities for 
the year ended December 31, 2014 was primarily related to more cash being expended for the repurchase of our common stock, 
partially offset by a decrease in the amount of cash received in exchange for the issuance of our common stock. The increase in 
cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily related to a decrease in the excess tax 
benefit from stock based compensation.

Contractual and Capital Commitments

We have various contractual obligations consisting of purchase obligations and operating leases. Purchase obligations include 
agreements with consultants, construction contracts, contracts with third party service providers and other future contracts or 
agreements. The following table sets forth our future contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

Operating lease obligations
Purchase obligations
Total contractual obligations

Payments Due by Period

Total

20,211
4,452
$24,663

Less than 1 Year

1–3 Years

3–5 Years

More than 5 Years

2,242
3,564
$5,806

4,682
888
$5,570

3,933
—
$3,933

9,354
—
$9,354

In the fall of 2014, APUS began construction of a new facility in Charles Town, West Virginia to house our information technol-
ogy staff. We anticipate that the total cost of constructing the facility will be approximately $8.6 million, all of which will be 
funded using our cash on hand.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have off-balance sheet financing arrangements, including any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial 
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities.

Impact of Inflation

We do not believe that inflation had a material impact on our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014,  
2013 or 2012. There can be no assurance that future inflation will not have an adverse impact on our operating results and 
financial condition.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are subject to the impact of interest rate changes and may be subject to changes in the market values of future invest-
ments. We invest our excess cash in bank overnight deposits. We have no material derivative financial instruments or derivative 
commodity instruments as of December 31, 2014.

Market Risk
We have no material derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. We maintain our cash and cash 
equivalents in bank deposit accounts, which may exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such 
accounts. We believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents. Due to the short-term 
duration of our investment portfolio and the low risk profile of our investments, an immediate 100 basis point change in interest 
rates would not have a material effect on the fair market value of our portfolio.

123

FORM 10-KInterest Rate Risk
We are subject to risk from adverse changes in interest rates, primarily relating to our investing of excess funds in cash 
equivalents bearing variable interest rates, which are tied to various market indices. Our future investment income will vary due 
to changes in interest rates. At December 31, 2014, a 10% increase or decrease in interest rates would not have a material 
impact on our future earnings, fair values, or cash flows related to investments in cash equivalents.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

American Public Education, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page
125
126
127
128
130
131

124

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders 
American Public Education, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Public Education, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of 
December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each 
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of American 
Public Education, Inc. and Subsidiaries listed in Item 15(a). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the 
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and 
schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). 
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial 
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts 
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant 
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits 
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial 
position of American Public Education, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their 
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. 
generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in 
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the informa-
tion set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), 
American Public Education, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on 
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 
Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated February 26, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness  
of American Public Education, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ McGladrey LLP

McLean, Virginia 
February 26, 2015

125

FORM 10-KConsolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Assets
Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $13,175 in 2013 and $10,699 in 2014
Prepaid expenses
Income tax receivable
Deferred income taxes

Total current assets
Property and equipment, net
Note receivable
Investments
Goodwill
Other assets, net
Total assets

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:

Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Deferred revenue and student deposits

Total current liabilities
Deferred income taxes
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 4 and 8)

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; Authorized shares—10,000;  

no shares issued or outstanding

Common Stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—100,000;  
17,578 issued and outstanding in 2013; 17,152 issued  
and outstanding in 2014

Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

As of December 31,

2013

2014

$  94,820
9,520
5,598
3,215
3,432
116,585
90,733
6,000
10,597
38,148
9,592
$271,655

$  11,563
17,866
24,829
54,258
10,328
64,586

$115,634
6,130
6,379
2,029
6,046
136,218
102,424
—
12,051
38,634
8,577
$297,904

$  11,029
13,416
23,805
48,250
15,436
63,686

—

—

176
164,913
41,980
207,069
$271,655

172
169,654
64,392
234,218
$297,904

126

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Revenues
Costs and expenses:

Instructional costs and services
Selling and promotional
General and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Total costs and expenses

Income before interest income and income taxes
Interest income, net
Income from operations before income taxes
Income tax expense
Equity investment loss, net of tax
Net income
Net income per common share:

Basic
Diluted

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

Basic
Diluted

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

Year Ended December 31,

2012

$313,516

110,192
59,761
63,615
11,146
244,714
68,802
135
68,937
26,528
$       (86)
$  42,323

$     2.38
$     2.35

17,772
18,041

2013

$329,479

112,784
65,687
70,063
13,508
262,042
67,437
309
67,746
25,645
$       (67)
$  42,034

$     2.38
$     2.35

17,656
17,921

2014

$350,020

123,765
69,229
75,073
16,121
284,188
65,832
361
66,193
25,150
$     (166)
$  40,877

$     2.36
$     2.33

17,357
17,543

127

FORM 10-KConsolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(In thousands, except shares)

Balance as of December 31, 2011
Stock issued for cash
Stock issued for director compensation
Repurchased shares of common and restricted stock from stockholders
Stock-based compensation
Repurchased and retired shares of common stock
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation
Net income
Balance as of December 31, 2012
Stock issued for cash
Stock issued for director compensation
Repurchased shares of common and restricted stock from stockholders
Stock-based compensation
Repurchased and retired shares of common stock
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation
Net income
Balance as of December 31, 2013
Stock issued for cash
Stock issued for director compensation
Repurchased shares of common and restricted stock from stockholders
Stock-based compensation
Repurchased and retired shares of common stock
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation
Net income
Balance as of December 31, 2014

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

Preferred Stock

Shares

Amount

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

$—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$—

Common Stock

Repurchased Stock

Amount

$      178

Shares

Amount

$       —

Additional  

Paid-In  

Capital

$147,053

(Accumulated 

Stockholders’ 

Shares

17,844,296

408,739

3,098

(10,697)

(493,491)

—

—

—

237,482

2,802

(20,540)

394,064

—

—

—

133,643

2,535

(30,973)

(530,962)

—

—

—

17,751,945

178

17,577,625

176

5

—

—

—

(5)

—

—

2

—

—

—

(4)

—

—

1

—

—

—

(5)

—

—

(493,491)

(15,399)

493,491

15,399

(394,064)

(13,584)

394,064

13,584

(530,962)

(18,470)

530,962

18,470

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

17,151,868

$      172

$       —

$169,654

Retained 

Earnings 

Deficit)

$(13,398)

(15,399)

42,323

13,526

(13,580)

42,034

41,980

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(18,465)

40,877

$ 64,392

Total 

Equity

$133,833

4,058

116

(15,856)

3,818

(5)

2,866

42,323

171,153

3,312

104

(14,423)

4,024

42,034

207,069

(19,712)

5,107

—

865

537

90

—

250

40,877

$234,218

4,053

116

(457)

3,818

—

2,866

—

157,449

3,310

104

(839)

4,024

164,913

—

865

—

536

90

—

250

—

(1,242)

5,107

128

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC. 
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Repurchased shares of common and restricted stock from stockholders

Repurchased shares of common and restricted stock from stockholders

(In thousands, except shares)

Balance as of December 31, 2011

Stock issued for cash

Stock issued for director compensation

Stock-based compensation

Repurchased and retired shares of common stock

Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation

Net income

Balance as of December 31, 2012

Stock issued for cash

Stock issued for director compensation

Stock-based compensation

Repurchased and retired shares of common stock

Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation

Net income

Balance as of December 31, 2013

Stock issued for cash

Stock issued for director compensation

Stock-based compensation

Repurchased and retired shares of common stock

Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation

Net income

Balance as of December 31, 2014

Repurchased shares of common and restricted stock from stockholders

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

Preferred Stock

Shares

Amount

$—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

$—

Common Stock

Repurchased Stock

Shares

17,844,296
408,739
3,098
(10,697)
—
(493,491)
—
—
17,751,945
237,482
2,802
(20,540)
—
394,064
—
—
17,577,625
133,643
2,535
(30,973)
—
(530,962)
—
—
17,151,868

Amount

$      178
5
—
—
—
(5)
—
—
178
2
—
—
—
(4)
—
—
176
1
—
—
—
(5)
—
—
$      172

Shares

—
—
—
(493,491)
—
493,491
—
—
—
—
—
(394,064)
—
394,064
—
—
—
—
—
(530,962)
—
530,962
—
—
—

Amount

$       —
—
—
(15,399)
—
15,399
—
—
—
—
—
(13,584)
—
13,584
—
—
—
—
—
(18,470)
—
18,470
—
—
$       —

Additional  
Paid-In  
Capital

Retained 
Earnings 
(Accumulated 
Deficit)

Total 
Stockholders’ 
Equity

$147,053
4,053
116
(457)
3,818
—
2,866
—
157,449
3,310
104
(839)
4,024
—
865
—
164,913
536
90
(1,242)
5,107
—
250
—
$169,654

$(13,398)
—
—
—
—
(15,399)
—
42,323
13,526
—
—
—
—
(13,580)
—
42,034
41,980
—
—
—
—
(18,465)
—
40,877
$ 64,392

$133,833
4,058
116
(15,856)
3,818
(5)
2,866
42,323
171,153
3,312
104
(14,423)
4,024
—
865
42,034
207,069
537
90
(19,712)
5,107
—
250
40,877
$234,218

129

FORM 10-K 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

Operating activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating 

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2013

2014

$  42,323

$  42,034

$  40,877

activities, net of assets and liabilities acquired
Depreciation and amortization
Stock-based compensation
Loss on disposal
Investment loss
Stock issued for director compensation
Deferred income taxes
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for bad debt
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Income tax receivable
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Income taxes payable
Deferred revenue and student deposits

Net cash provided by operating activities

Investing activities
Capital expenditures
Equity investment
Note receivable
Acquisition, net of cash acquired
Capitalized program development costs and other assets
Net cash used in investing activities

Financing activities
Cash paid for repurchase of common/restricted stock
Cash received from issuance of common stock
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
Net cash used in financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Income taxes paid

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

130

11,146
3,818
91
86
116
161

(929)
1,080
(3,350)
933
(2,444)
—
(107)
52,924

(35,014)
(6,750)
(6,000)
—
(328)
(48,092)

(15,861)
4,058
2,866
(8,937)
(4,105)
119,006
$114,901

13,508
4,024
62
67
104
2,018

2,720
(1,262)
1,738
(5,903)
5,047
—
(4,743)
59,414

(20,649)
(4,000)
—
(44,356)
(244)
(69,249)

(14,423)
3,312
865
(10,246)
(20,081)
114,901
$  94,820

16,121
5,369
115
166
90
2,494

3,390
(512)
1,186
(534)
(6,708)
—
(1,024)
61,030

(24,596)
(1,620)
6,000
—
(1,075)
(21,291)

(19,711)
536
250
(18,925)
20,814
94,820
$115,634

$  26,851

$  21,014

$  21,631

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.  Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
American Public Education, Inc., or APEI, which together with its subsidiaries is referred to as the “Company,” is a provider  
of online and campus-based postsecondary education to approximately 112,470 students through the operations of two 
subsidiary institutions:

•  American Public University System, Inc., or APUS, provides online postsecondary education directed primarily at the needs 

of the military and public safety communities through American Military University, or AMU, and American Public University, 
or APU. APUS is regionally accredited by the Higher Learning Commission.

•  National Education Seminars, Inc., which is referred to in these financial statements as Hondros College of Nursing, or 

HCON, provides nursing education to students at four campuses in the State of Ohio as well as online to serve the needs of 
the nursing and healthcare community. HCON is nationally accredited by the Accrediting Council of Independent Colleges 
and Schools and the RN-to-BSN Program is accredited by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education. HCON was 
acquired by APEI on November 1, 2013.

The Company’s institutions are licensed or otherwise authorized, or are in the process of obtaining such licenses or authoriza-
tions, to offer postsecondary education programs by state authorities to the extent the Company believes such licenses or 
authorizations are required, and are certified by the United States Department of Education, or ED, to participate in student 
financial aid programs authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or Title IV programs.

Our operations are organized into two reportable segments:

•  American Public Education Segment, or APEI Segment. This segment reflects the historical operations of APEI prior 
to the acquisition of HCON and reflects operational activities at APUS, other corporate activities, and minority investments.

•  Hondros College of Nursing Segment, or HCON Segment. This segment reflects the operational activities of HCON. 
The Company acquired HCON on November 1, 2013, and therefore the consolidated results for periods prior to November 1, 
2013 do not include any results from HCON.

A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies follows:

Basis of accounting. The accompanying financial statements are presented in accordance with the accrual basis of account-
ing, whereby revenue is recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when incurred.

Principles of consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include accounts of APEI and its wholly- 
owned subsidiaries. All material inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and cash equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of ninety days or 
less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash. Cash and cash equivalents includes funds held for students for unbilled educational services that were 
received from Title IV program funds. As a trustee of these Title IV program funds, we are required to maintain and restrict 
these funds pursuant to the terms of our program participation agreement with the U.S. Department of Education. Restricted 
cash on our Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013 and 2014 is recorded as $6.3 million and $3.9 million, respectively. Changes 
in restricted cash that represent funds held for students as described above are included in cash flows from operating activities 
on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows because these restricted funds are a core activity of our operations.

131

FORM 10-KAccounts receivable. Course tuition is recorded as accounts receivable and deferred revenue at the time students begin a 
class or term. Students may remit tuition payments at any time or they may elect various other payment options which can delay 
the receipt of payment up until the class or term starts or longer. These other payment options include payments by sponsors, 
financial aid, alternative loans, or a tuition assistance program that remits payments directly to the subsidiary. When a student 
remits payment after a class or term has begun, accounts receivable is reduced. If payment is made prior to the start of a class 
or term, the payment is recorded as a student deposit, and the student is provided access to the online classroom when classes 
start, in the case of APUS, or allowed to start the term, in the case of HCON. If one of the various other payment options are 
confirmed as secured, the student is provided access to the online classroom or allowed to start the term. Generally, if no 
receipt is confirmed or payment option secured, the student will be dropped from the online class or not allowed to start the 
term. Therefore, billed amounts represent charges that have been prepared and sent to students or the applicable third party 
payor according to the terms agreed upon in advance.

DoD tuition assistance programs are billed by branch of service on a course-by-course basis when a student starts class, 
whereas Title IV programs are billed based on the classes included in a student’s semester. Billed accounts receivable are 
considered past due if the invoice has been outstanding for more than 30 days. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on 
management’s evaluation of the status of existing accounts receivable. Among other factors, management considers the age of 
the receivable, the anticipated source of payment and the Company’s historical allowance considerations. Consideration is also 
given to any specific known risk areas among the existing accounts receivable balances. Recoveries of receivables previously 
written off are recorded when received. The Company does not charge interest on our past due accounts receivable.

Property and equipment. All property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation, except the acquired 
assets of HCON, which were recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. Depreciation and amortization are calculated on a 
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Our proprietary system, Partnership At a Distance™, or PAD, is  
a customized student information and services system used by APUS to manage admissions, online orientation, course registra-
tions, tuition payments, grade reporting, progress toward degrees, and various other functions. Costs associated with this 
system have been capitalized in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification, or 
FASB ASC, Topic 350, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, and classified as 
property and equipment. These costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of five years. The Company also capitalizes 
certain costs for academic program development. These costs are transferred to property and equipment upon completion of 
each program and amortized over an estimated life not to exceed three years.

Investments. On September 30, 2012, the Company made a $6.8 million investment in preferred stock of NWHW Holdings, Inc., 
or NWHW Holdings, a holding company which operates New Horizons Worldwide, Inc., or New Horizons, representing approxi-
mately 19.9% of the fully diluted equity of NWHW Holdings. New Horizons is a global IT training company operating over 300 
locations around the world through franchise arrangements in 45 states and 70 countries. In connection with the investment, 
the Company is entitled to certain rights, including the right to representation on the Board of Directors of NWHW Holdings. The 
Company accounts for its investment in New Horizons under the equity method of accounting. Therefore, the Company recorded 
the investment at cost and recognizes its share of earnings or losses in the investee in the periods for which they are reported 
with a corresponding adjustment in the carrying amount of the investment.

On February 20, 2013, the Company made a $4.0 million investment in preferred stock of Fidelis Education, Inc., or Fidelis 
Education, representing approximately 21.6% of its fully diluted equity. Fidelis Education is developing a learning relationship 
management system that will assist working adult students with education advising and career mentoring services as they 
pursue college degrees. In connection with the investment, the Company is entitled to certain rights, including the right to 
representation on the Board of Directors of Fidelis Education. The Company accounts for its investment in Fidelis Education 
under the equity method of accounting. Therefore, the Company recorded the investment at cost and recognizes its share of 

132

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.earnings or losses in the investee in the periods for which they are reported with a corresponding adjustment in the carrying 
amount of the investment.

On April 2, 2014, the Company made a $1.5 million investment in preferred stock of Second Avenue Software, Inc., or Second 
Avenue Software, representing approximately 25.9% of its fully diluted equity. Second Avenue Software is a game-based 
education software company that develops software on a proprietary and “work-for-hire” basis. In connection with the invest-
ment, the Company is entitled to certain rights, including the right to representation on the Board of Directors of Second Avenue 
Software. The Company accounts for its investment in Second Avenue Software under the equity method of accounting. 
Therefore, the Company recorded the investment at cost and recognizes its share of earnings or losses in the investee in the 
periods for which they are reported with a corresponding adjustment in the carrying amount of the investment.

Note Receivable. In connection with the Company’s minority investment in NWHW Holdings, the Company extended $6.0 mil-
lion in credit to New Horizons in exchange for a subordinated note. The note was interest only and was scheduled to mature on 
September 28, 2018. Interest was payable monthly at a rate of 5.0% per annum during the first five years of the note and 
monthly at a rate of 6.0% per annum in the sixth year. On December 16, 2014, New Horizons prepaid the note receivable in full, 
including pro rata interest owed.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired 
business over the amount assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible 
assets are assessed at least annually for impairment, or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change between 
annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the respective reporting unit below its carrying amount. 
Under Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, the 
Company is permitted, but not required, to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a 
quantitative goodwill impairment test.

Valuation of long-lived assets. The Company accounts for the valuation of long-lived assets under FASB ASC Topic 360, 
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. FASB ASC Topic 360 requires that long-lived assets and certain 
identifiable intangible assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the 
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the long-lived asset is measured by a comparison of the 
carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are 
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the 
assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reportable at the lower of the carrying 
amount or fair value, less costs to sell.

Revenue recognition. The Company records all tuition as deferred revenue when a student begins a class, in the case of 
APUS, or starts a term, in the case of HCON. At the beginning of each class or term, revenue is recognized on a pro rata basis 
over the period of the class or term, which is, for APUS, either an eight- or sixteen-week period and, for HCON, a quarterly term. 
This results in deferred revenue on the Company’s balance sheet that includes future revenues that have not yet been earned 
for classes and terms that are in progress. The revenue recognition policies of each of the Company’s reportable segments is 
discussed below.

American Public University System

APUS’s tuition revenues vary from period to period based on the number of net course registrations. Students may remit tuition 
payments through the online registration process at any time or they may elect various payment options, including payments by 
sponsors, alternative loans, financial aid, or the DoD tuition assistance program which remits payments directly to APUS. These 
other payment options can delay the receipt of payment up until the class starts or longer, resulting in the recording of a 

133

FORM 10-Kreceivable from the student and deferred revenue at the beginning of each session. Tuition revenue for sessions in progress that 
has not been earned by APUS is presented as deferred revenue in the accompanying balance sheet.

APUS refunds 100% of tuition for courses that are dropped by students before the conclusion of the first seven days of a course. 
Because courses begin the first Monday of every month and penalty free drops occur by the second Monday of every month, the 
Company does not recognize revenue for dropped courses. After a course begins, if a student does not drop the course within 
the first seven days, APUS uses the following refund policy:

8-Week Course—Tuition Refund Schedule

Withdrawal Request Date

Before or During Week 1
During Week 2
During Weeks 3 and 4
During Weeks 5 through 8

16-Week Course—Tuition Refund Schedule

Withdrawal Request Date

Before or During Week 1
During Week 2
During Weeks 3 and 4
During Weeks 5 through 8
During Weeks 9 through 16

Tuition Refund Percentage

100%
  75%
  50%
No Refund

Tuition Refund Percentage

100%
100%
  75%
  50%
No Refund

Additional refund policies may apply to students of certain states in accordance with specific state and other local requirements.

APUS recognizes revenue on a pro rata basis over the period of its courses as APUS completes the tasks entitling it to the 
benefits represented by such revenue. If a student withdraws during the academic term, APUS recognizes as revenue the 
remaining non-refundable amount due from the student in the period the withdrawal occurs. The calculation of the remaining 
non-refundable amount is based upon the APUS student refund policy. For those students who have an outstanding receivable 
balance at the date of withdrawal, APUS assesses collectability and only recognizes as revenue those amounts where collect-
ability is reasonably assured based on APUS’s history with similar student accounts. This policy was implemented on January 1, 
2015. Prior to this, APUS recognized revenue for all student withdrawals and established an allowance for those receivables 
considered uncollectible. The Company does not believe that this change in policy will have a material effect on its results of 
operations or financial condition.

Other revenue includes charges for transcript credit evaluation, which includes assistance in securing official transcripts on 
behalf of the student in addition to evaluating transcripts for transfer credit, and a technology fee per course. APUS provides a 
grant to cover the technology fee for students using DoD tuition assistance programs or VA education benefits. Students also 
are charged withdrawal, graduation, late registration, transcript request and comprehensive examination fees, when applicable. 
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605-50, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received 
from a Vendor, other fees also include book purchase commissions APUS receives for graduate student book purchases and 
ancillary supply purchases students make directly from APUS’s preferred book vendor.

134

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Hondros College of Nursing

HCON’s tuition revenues vary from period to period based on the number of students enrolled. Students may remit tuition 
payments at any time, or they may elect various payment options that can delay receipt of payment up until the term starts or 
longer. These other payment options include payments by sponsors, financial aid, alternative loans, or payment plan options. If 
one of the various other payment options are confirmed as secured, the student is allowed to start the term. Students have 
access to their account statements on the student portal prior to the start of the term. Sponsor invoices are prepared and sent 
according to their billing terms. All financial aid is awarded prior to the start of the term and requests for authorization of 
disbursement begin in the first week of the term. Tuition revenue for the term in progress that has not been yet earned by HCON 
is presented as deferred revenue in the accompanying balance sheet.

HCON’s refund policy complies with the rules of the Ohio State Board of Career Colleges and Schools and is applicable to each 
term. For a course with an on-campus or other in-person component, the date of withdrawal is determined by a student’s last 
attended day of clinical offering, laboratory session, or lecture. For an online course, the date of withdrawal is determined by a 
student’s last submitted assignment in the course. HCON uses the following refund policy:

Withdrawal Request Date

Before first full calendar week of the quarter
During first full calendar week of the quarter
During second full calendar week of the quarter
During third full calendar week of the quarter
During fourth full week of the quarter

Tuition Refund Percentage

100%, plus registration fee
75%, plus registration fee
50%, plus registration fee
25%, plus registration fee
No Refund

Additional refund policies may apply to students of certain states in accordance with specific state and other local requirements.

Deferred Revenue and Student Deposits. Deferred revenue and student deposits at December 31, 2013 and 2014 consisted 
of the following (in thousands):

Deferred revenue
Student deposits
Total deferred revenue and student deposits

As of December 31,

2013

$14,188
  10,641
$24,829

2014

$13,367
  10,438
$23,805

The Company provides scholarships to certain students to assist them financially and promote their registration. Scholarship 
assistance of $2,832,000, $2,855,000 and $2,589,000 was provided for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, 
respectively, and are included as a reduction to revenue in the accompanying statements of income.

Advertising costs. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012, 
2013 and 2014 were $41,929,000, $46,995,000 and $50,950,000 respectively, and are included in selling and promotion costs in 
the accompanying statements of income.

Income taxes. Deferred taxes are determined using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for 
deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary 
differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. As these differ-
ences reverse, they will enter into the determination of future taxable income. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation 

135

FORM 10-Kallowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets 
will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the 
date of enactment of such changes.

There were no material uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014. Interest and penalties associated with 
uncertain income tax positions would be classified as income tax expense. The Company has not recorded any material interest 
or penalties during any of the years presented.

Stock-based compensation. The Company applies FASB ASC Topic 718, Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to 
expense share-based compensation based on fair value.

The following amounts of stock-based compensation have been included in the operating expense line-items indicated  
(in thousands):

Instructional costs and services
Selling and promotional
General and administrative
Total stock-based compensation expense

Year Ended December 31,

2012

$   896
378
2,544
$3,818

2013

$   876
444
2,704
$4,024

2014

$1,274
568
3,527
$5,369

Income per common share. Basic net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of 
common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share increases the shares used in the per share 
calculation by the dilutive effects of options, warrants, and restricted stock.

There were no outstanding options to purchase common shares that were excluded in the computation of diluted net income per 
common share for the year ended December 31, 2013. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2014, respectively, there 
were 265,965 and 365,832 anti-dilutive stock options excluded from the calculation.

Fair value of financial instruments. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, tuition receivable, accounts 
payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Concentration of credit risk. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts with various 
financial institutions. Cash and cash equivalent balances may exceed the FDIC insurance limit. The Company has not experi-
enced any losses in such accounts.

Estimates. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the 
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, 
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 2.  Acquisition Accounting
On November, 1, 2013, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of HCON for an initial adjusted aggregate 
purchase price of approximately $46.3 million. The HCON acquisition was accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 805 Business 
Combinations which requires the acquisition method to be used for all business combinations. Under FASB ASC Topic 805, the 
assets and liabilities of an acquired company are reported at business fair value along with the fair value of unrecorded 

136

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.intangible assets at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over 
the amount assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets. 
The initial purchase price allocation resulted in $38.1 million of goodwill, which is deductible for tax purposes. Intangible assets 
are amortized over their estimated useful lives unless they are deemed to have an indefinite life. Identified intangible assets 
with an indefinite life are trade name, accreditation, licensing and Title IV, and affiliate agreements as they benefit the Company 
indefinitely. Because HCON is wholly owned by the Company as a result of the acquisition, management has determined that 
push-down accounting is appropriate.

As part of the transaction, the Company and the selling shareholders of HCON agreed to an election under Section 338(h)(10) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as it relates to the acquisition of HCON by the Company. A Section 338(h)(10) 
election is an election made jointly by buyer(s) and seller(s) to treat a stock acquisition as an asset acquisition for U.S. federal 
income tax purposes. The acquisition resulted in a preliminary estimate of fair value of its liability to the selling shareholders 
related to the Section 338(h)(10) election in the amount of $150,000, which was included in the initial $38.1 million goodwill 
allocation. Prior to December 31, 2014, the Company revised its estimate of the fair value of its liability to HCON’s selling 
shareholders related to the Section 338(h)(10) election to approximately $636,000. As a result, the total adjusted aggregate 
purchase price and the amount of goodwill have been revised to $46.8 million and $38.6 million, respectively.

The fair value of identified intangible assets acquired was determined using one of the following three valuation methodologies:

•  Cost approach;

• 

Income approach; or

•  Market approach.

(in thousands)

Fair value consideration transferred:
Cash
Fair Value of IRC 338(h)(10) election

Total fair value consideration transferred

Recognized amounts of identifiable tangible assets  

acquired and liabilities assumed:

Assets acquired
Liabilities assumed

Assets acquired in excess of liabilities assumed

Recognized identified intangible assets:
Student contracts and relationships
Trade name
Curricula
Accreditation, licensing and Title IV
Affiliate agreements
Non-compete agreements

Total recognized identified intangible assets

Goodwill

Useful Life

December 31, 2014

$46,128
636
$46,764

$  4,834
4,786
$      48

$  3,870
1,998
405
1,686
37
86
$  8,082
38,634

6 years

3 years

5 years

137

FORM 10-KNote 3.  Property and Equipment
Property and equipment at December 31, 2013 and 2014 consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

Land
Building and building improvements
Leasehold improvements
Office equipment
Computer equipment
Furniture and fixtures
Other Capitalizable Assets
Software development
Program development

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

Useful Life

—
27.5–39 years
up to 15 years
5 years
3 years
7 years
1–5 years
5 years
3 years

2013

$   8,196
47,420
2,179
2,500
18,777
7,476
107
51,755
3,162
141,572
50,839
$  90,733

2014

$   9,244
52,938
2,391
2,351
22,615
7,533
708
64,593
4,110
166,483
64,059
$102,424

During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $10,996,000, 
$13,225,000 and $14,980,000, respectively. In addition, the Company recorded amortization expense related to other assets  
of $150,000, $283,000, and $1,141,000 during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Note 4.  Operating Leases
The APEI Segment leases office space in Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia under operating leases that expire through 
September 2018. HCON operates on four campuses in Ohio, located in the suburban areas of Cincinnati, Columbus, Dayton and 
Cleveland under operating leases that expire through June 2029. Rent expense related to the APEI Segment’s operating leases 
was $1,656,000, $1,647,000 and $1,666,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Rent expense 
related to the HCON Segment’s operating leases was $317,000 for the two-month period ended December 31, 2013 and 
$2,212,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014. HCON was acquired by APEI on November 1, 2013.

The minimum rental commitment due under the operating leases is as follows (in thousands):

Years Ending December 31,

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019 and beyond
Total minimum rental commitment

138

Combined

$  2,242
2,310
2,372
2,041
11,246
$20,211

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Note 5.  Income Taxes
The components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands):

Current income tax expense:

Federal
State

Deferred tax expense:

Federal
State

Income Tax Expense

2012

2013

2014

$22,937
3,430
26,367

150
11
161
$26,528

$20,533
3,094
23,627

1,858
160
2,018
$25,645

$19,404
3,252
22,656

2,623
(129)
2,494
$25,150

The tax effects of principal temporary differences are as follows (in thousands):

Deferred tax assets:

Property and equipment
Stock option compensation expense
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Accrued vacation and severance
Restricted stock
Investment

Deferred tax liabilities:

Income tax deductible capitalized software development costs
Prepaid expenses

Total tax effects

2013

2014

$   5,472
1,685
4,432
542
1,180
(39)
13,272

(18,626)
(1,542)
(20,168)
$  (6,896)

$   9,215
1,556
3,846
549
1,818
100
17,084

(24,750)
(1,724)
(26,474)
$  (9,390)

Income tax expense differs from the amount of tax determined by applying the United States Federal income tax rates to pretax 
income and loss due to permanent tax differences, research and development tax credits related to capitalized software 
development costs, and the application of state apportionment laws, as follows (in thousands):

Tax expense at statutory rate
State taxes, net
Permanent differences
Other

2012

2013

2014

Amount

$24,135
2,241
154
(2)
$26,528

%

35.00
3.25
0.22
—
38.47

Amount

$23,688
2,069
(275)
163
$25,645

%

35.00
3.06
(0.41)
0.24
37.89

Amount

$23,110
1,985
228
(173)
$25,150

%

35.00
3.01
0.35
(0.27)
38.09

139

FORM 10-KPermanent differences in the table above are mainly attributable to minority investment losses, nondeductible meals and 
entertainment expenses and non-deductible employer contributions to the American Public Education, Inc. Employee Stock 
Purchase Plan, or ESPP.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income taxes as well as income tax of multiple state jurisdictions. For federal and state 
tax purposes, tax years 2011–2013 remain open to examination.

Note 6.  Other Employee Benefits
The Company has established a tax deferred 401(k) retirement plan that provides retirement benefits to all of its eligible 
employees. Participants may elect to contribute up to 60% of their gross annual earnings not to exceed ERISA and IRS limits. 
The plan provides for Company discretionary profit sharing contributions at matching percentages. Employees immediately vest 
100% in all salary reduction contributions and employer contributions. On June 20, 2008, the Company filed a Form S-8 to 
register 100,000 shares of common stock that may be purchased in the open market and subsequently issued pursuant to the 
retirement plan. The Company made discretionary contributions to the plan of $2,447,000, $2,753,000 and $3,270,000 for the 
years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

In November 2007, the Company adopted the American Public Education, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the ESPP, which 
was implemented effective July 1, 2008 with quarterly enrollment periods. Eligible participants may only enter the plan and 
establish their withholdings at the start of an enrollment period. Participating employees may withdraw from the plan and end 
payroll deductions any time up to five days before the share purchase date and funds will be returned to them. Under the ESPP, 
participating employees may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain limitations, at 85% of its fair 
market value on the last day of the quarterly period. The total value of contributions per participant may not exceed $21,000 
annually (or the value of the common stock cannot exceed $25,000). There were initially 100,000 shares of common stock 
available for purchase by participating employees under the ESPP. On June 13, 2014, the Company’s shareholders approved an 
amendment to the ESPP to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the plan 
by 100,000 shares, extend the term of the ESPP to March 7, 2024, and make other administrative changes. Shares purchased in 
the open market for employees for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014 were as follows:

Purchase Date

March 31, 2012
June 30, 2012
September 30, 2012
December 31, 2012
Total/Weighted Average
March 31, 2013
June 30, 2013
September 30, 2013
December 31, 2013
Total/Weighted Average
March 31, 2014
June 30, 2014
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2014
Total/Weighted Average

140

Shares

4,749
6,214
4,517
5,093
20,573
4,760
4,726
4,226
4,556
18,268
4,961
5,180
5,246
3,931
19,318

Common Stock  
Fair Value

Purchase  
Price

Compensation  
Expense

$38.00
$32.00
$36.43
$36.12
$35.38
$34.89
$37.16
$37.80
$43.47
$38.29
$35.08
$34.38
$26.99
$36.87
$33.06

$32.30
$27.20
$30.97
$30.70
$30.07
$29.66
$31.59
$32.13
$36.95
$32.55
$29.82
$29.22
$22.94
$31.34
$28.10

$  27,069
$  29,827
$  24,663
$  27,604
$109,163
$  24,895
$  26,324
$  23,961
$  29,705
$104,885
$  26,095
$  26,729
$  21,246
$  21,738
$  95,808

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Note 7.  Stockholders’ Equity

Stock Incentive Plans

On March 15, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the American Public Education, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, 
or the 2011 Incentive Plan, and the Company’s stockholders approved the 2011 Incentive Plan on May 6, 2011, at which time the 
2011 Incentive Plan became effective. Upon effectiveness of the 2011 Incentive Plan, the Company ceased making awards under 
the American Public Education, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, or the 2007 Incentive Plan. The 2011 Incentive Plan allows the 
Company to grant up to 2,000,000 shares plus any shares of common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 
2007 Incentive Plan or the American Public Education, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan, or the 2002 Stock Plan, that terminate due to 
expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise without the issuance of such shares. As of December 31, 2014, there were 
361,297 shares subject to outstanding awards under the 2011 Incentive Plan and 433,873 shares subject to outstanding awards 
under the 2002 Stock Plan and the 2007 Incentive Plan. Awards under the 2011 Incentive Plan may include the following award 
types: stock options, which may be either incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options; stock appreciation rights; 
restricted stock; restricted stock units; dividend equivalent rights; performance shares; performance units; cash-based awards; 
other stock-based awards, including unrestricted shares; or any combination of the foregoing. Prior to 2012, the Company used a 
mix of stock options and restricted stock, but since 2011 the Company has not issued any stock options.

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, the Company recognized $3,818,000, $4,024,000 and $5,369,000 in 
stock-based compensation expense as required under FASB ASC Topic 718, and recognized a total income tax benefit of 
$1,512,000, $1,594,000 and $2,022,000, respectively.

Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants is expensed over the vesting 
period using the straight-line method for Company employees and the graded-vesting method for members of the Board of 
Directors, and is measured using APEI’s stock price on the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is estimated at the 
date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Prior to 2012, 
the Company calculated the expected term of stock option awards using the “simplified method” in accordance with Securities 
and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletins No. 107 and 110 because the Company lacked historical data and was 
unable to make reasonable assumptions regarding the future. The Company also estimates forfeitures of share-based awards at 
the time of grant and revises such estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from original projections. The 
Company makes assumptions with respect to expected stock price volatility based on the average historical volatility of peers 
with similar attributes. In addition, the Company determines the risk free interest rate by selecting the U.S. Treasury five-year 
constant maturity, quoted on an investment basis in effect at the time of grant for that business day. Estimates of fair value are 
subjective and are not intended to predict actual future events, and subsequent events are not indicative of the reasonableness 
of the original estimates of fair value made under FASB ASC Topic 718.

141

FORM 10-KA summary of the status of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plans as of December 31, 2012 and the changes during the periods 
then ended is as follows:

(in thousands)

Outstanding, December 31, 2011
Options granted
Awards exercised
Options forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2012
Exercisable, December 31, 2012

Number  
of Options

1,067,511
—
(369,918)
(6,511)
691,082
513,201

Weighted Average 
Exercise Price

Weighted Average 
Contractual Life  
(years)

Aggregate  
Intrinsic Value

$21.22
$    —
$10.97
$34.03
$26.59
$23.10

3.86
3.57

$6,926
$6,849

A summary of the status of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plans as of December 31, 2013 and the changes during the periods 
then ended is as follows:

Number  
of Options

Weighted Average 
Exercise Price

Weighted Average 
Contractual Life  
(years)

Aggregate  
Intrinsic Value 
(in thousands)

Outstanding, December 31, 2012
Options granted
Awards exercised
Options forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2013
Exercisable, December 31, 2013

691,082
—
(171,897)
(17,983)
501,202
445,564

$26.59
$    —
$18.92
$37.64
$28.82
$27.73

3.05
2.93

$7,343
$7,012

A summary of the status of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plans as of December 31, 2014 and the changes during the periods 
then ended is as follows:

Number  
of Options

Weighted Average 
Exercise Price

Weighted Average 
Contractual Life  
(years)

Aggregate  
Intrinsic Value 
(in thousands)

Outstanding, December 31, 2013
Options granted
Awards exercised
Options forfeited
Outstanding, December 31, 2014
Exercisable, December 31, 2014

501,202
—
(46,198)
(20,603)
434,401
434,401

$28.82
$    —
$13.66
$37.04
$30.04
$30.04

The following table summarizes information regarding stock option exercises:

(In thousands)

Proceeds from stock options exercised
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised
Tax benefit from exercises

2012

$4,058
$9,580
$3,459

2.14
2.14

2013

$3,253
$3,667
$1,348

$3,080
$3,080

2014

$   631
$1,033
$   193

142

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.There were no outstanding options to purchase common shares that were excluded in the computation of diluted net income per 
common share for the year ended December 31, 2013. There were 265,965 and 365,832 anti-dilutive stock options excluded 
from the calculation for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2014, respectively.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

The table below sets forth the restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2012:

Non vested, December 31, 2011
Shares granted
Vested shares
Shares forfeited
Non vested, December 31, 2012

Number  
of Shares

79,075
97,240
(38,821)
(1,097)
136,397

Weighted Average 
Grant Price and  
Fair Value

$37.44
  40.09
  37.80
  38.87
$39.21

The table below sets forth the restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2013:

Non vested, December 31, 2012
Shares granted
Vested shares
Shares forfeited
Non vested, December 31, 2013

Number  
of Shares

136,397
123,951
(65,585)
(4,002)
190,761

Weighted Average 
Grant Price and  
Fair Value

$39.21
37.50
37.70
39.94
$38.61

The table below sets forth the restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2014:

Non vested, December 31, 2013
Shares granted
Vested shares
Shares forfeited
Non vested, December 31, 2014

Number  
of Shares

190,761
272,550
(87,445)
(15,097)
360,769

Weighted Average 
Grant Price and  
Fair Value

$38.61
36.73
38.69
41.64
$37.03

There were no shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units excluded in the computation of diluted net income per 
common share for the year ended December 31, 2014. The Company recognized an income tax benefit of $948,000,  
$1,294,000 and $1,880,000 from vested restricted stock and restricted stock units for the years ended December 31, 2012, 
2013 and 2014, respectively.

At December 31, 2014, total unrecognized compensation expense in the amount of $8.7 million relates to non-vested restricted 
stock and restricted stock units which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

143

FORM 10-KDuring the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, the Company accepted for forfeiture 10,697 shares for $456,000, 
4,002 shares for $159,840, and 15,097 shares for $628,639, respectively, as a result of termination of employment.

Repurchase

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company repurchased 493,491 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value 
$0.01 per share. The chart below provides further detail as to the Company’s repurchases during the period.

Total Number  
of Shares 
Purchased  
as Part of 
Publicly 
Announced 
Plans or 
Programs

Maximum 
Number of 
Shares that 
May Yet Be 
Purchased 
Under the 
Plans or 
Programs(1)

Maximum 
Approximate 
Dollar Value of 
Shares that 
May Yet Be 
Purchased 
Under the 
Plans or 
Programs(2,3)

—
—
87,033
87,033
87,033
127,033
240,459
313,869
396,336
409,636
409,636
493,491
493,491
493,491

87,033
87,033
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
$20,000,000
18,851,824
15,515,168
13,409,230
11,163,298
10,724,643
10,724,643
7,992,647
7,992,647
$  7,992,647

Total Number  
of Shares 
Purchased

Average  
Price Paid  
per Share

—
—
87,033
—
—
40,000
113,426
73,410
82,467
13,300
—
83,855
—
493,491

$    —
$    —
$39.02
$    —
$    —
$28.70
$29.42
$28.69
$27.23
$32.98
$    —
$32.58
$    —
$31.21

January 1, 2012
February 1, 2012–February 29, 2012
March 1, 2012–March 31, 2012
April 1, 2012–April 30, 2012
May 14, 2012
May 1, 2012–May 31, 2012
June 1, 2012–June 30, 2012
July 1, 2012–July 31, 2012
August 1, 2012–August 31, 2012
September 1, 2012–September 30, 2012
October 1, 2012–October 31, 2012
November 1, 2012–November 30, 2012
December 1, 2012–December 31, 2012
Total

144

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company repurchased 394,064 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value 
$0.01 per share. The chart below provides further detail as to the Company’s repurchases during the period.

Total Number 
of Shares 
Purchased as 
Part of 
Publicly 
Announced 
Plans or 
Programs

Maximum 
Number of 
Shares that 
May Yet Be 
Purchased 
Under the 
Plans or 
Programs(1)

Total Number 
of Shares 
Purchased

Average 
Price Paid 
Per Share

January 1, 2013
January 1, 2013–January 31, 2013
February 1, 2013–February 28, 2013
March 14, 2013
March 1, 2013–March 31, 2013
April 1, 2013–April 30, 2013
May 1, 2013–May 31, 2013
June 1, 2013–June 30, 2013
July 1, 2013–July 31, 2013
August 1, 2013–August 31, 2013
September 1, 2013–September 30, 2013
October 1, 2013–October 31, 2013
November 1, 2013–November 30, 2013
December 1, 2013–December 31, 2013
Total

—
3,638
—
—
150,587
2,164
60,000
—
—
—
10,000
167,675
—
—
394,064

$    —
$34.79
$    —
$    —
$32.30
$33.00
$32.55
$    —
$    —
$    —
$37.91
$36.86
$    —
$    —
$34.47

—
3,638
3,638
3,638
154,225
156,389
216,389
216,389
216,389
216,389
226,389
394,064
394,064
394,064
394,064

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

Maximum 
Number (or 
Approximate 
Dollar Value)  
of Shares that 
May Yet Be 
Purchased 
Under the 
Plans or 
Programs(2,3)

$  7,992,647
7,866,068
7,866,068
22,866,068
18,001,740
17,930,337
15,977,321
15,977,321
15,977,321
15,977,321
15,598,221
9,417,721
9,417,721
9,417,721
$  9,417,721

145

FORM 10-KDuring the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company repurchased 530,962 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value 
$0.01 per share. The chart below provides further detail as to the Company’s repurchases during the period.

Total Number 
of Shares 
Purchased as 
Part of 
Publicly 
Announced 
Plans or 
Programs

Maximum 
Number of 
Shares that 
May Yet Be 
Purchased 
Under the 
Plans or 
Programs(1)

Total Number 
of Shares 
Purchased

Average 
Price Paid 
Per Share

—
—
—
—
40,000
185,000
139,568
51,760
—
—
—
30,000
84,634
530,962

$    —
$    —
$    —
$    —
$35.26
$34.60
$35.11
$34.95
$    —
$    —
$    —
$35.48
$34.09
$34.78

—
—
—
—
40,000
185,000
139,568
51,760
—
—
—
30,000
84,634
530,962

—
147,284
147,284
147,284
107,284
14,784
—
—
—
—
114,634
84,634
—
—

Maximum 
Number (or 
Approximate 
Dollar Value)  
of Shares that 
May Yet Be 
Purchased 
Under the 
Plans or 
Programs(2,3)

$  9,417,721
9,417,721
9,417,721
9,417,721
9,417,721
6,217,221
1,836,055
27,043
15,027,043
15,027,043
15,027,043
15,027,043
15,027,043
$15,027,043

January 1, 2014
January 20, 2014
January 1, 2014—January 30, 2014
February 1, 2014—February 28, 2014
March 1, 2014—March 31, 2014
April 1, 2014—April 30, 2014
May 1, 2014—May 31, 2014
June 1, 2014—June 30, 2014
June 13, 2014
July 1, 2014—September 31, 2014
October 1, 2014—October 31, 2014
November 1, 2014—November 30, 2014
December 1, 2014—December 31, 2014
Total

(1)  On December 9, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for its common stock, under which the Company 

may annually purchase up to the cumulative number of shares issued or deemed issued under the Company’s equity incentive and stock 
purchase plans. Repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transac-
tions based on business and market conditions. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time, and will be 
funded using the Company’s available cash. Pursuant to this authorization, for the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company repurchased 
147,284 and 114,634 restricted shares granted to employees under the Company’s equity incentive and stock purchase plans on January 20, 
2014 and October 1, 2014, respectively.

(2)  On May 14, 2012, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $20 million of shares of the Company’s common stock. On 
March 14, 2013, our Board of Directors increased this authorization by $15 million of shares, and on June 13, 2014, the Company’s Board of 
Directors increased the authorization by an additional $15 million of shares. Subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and 
other factors, the repurchases of the Company’s common stock may be made from time to time in open market transactions or privately 
negotiated transactions. The authorization does not obligate the Company to acquire any shares, and purchases may be commenced or 
suspended at any time based on market conditions and other factors that we deem appropriate.

(3)  The Company was deemed to have repurchased 10,697 and 20,540 shares of common stock forfeited by employees to satisfy minimum 

tax-withholding requirements in connection with the vesting of restricted stock grants during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 
2013, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, the Company was deemed to have repurchased 30,973 shares of 
common stock forfeited by employees to satisfy minimum tax-withholding requirements in connection with the vesting of restricted stock 
grants and to cover the exercise and minimum tax-withholding requirements of expiring stock options. These repurchases were not part of the 
stock repurchase programs authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors.

During the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013, and 2014, the Company retired 493,491, 394,064 and 530,962 shares of 
common stock, respectively, that had been previously repurchased and held in the Company’s treasury.

146

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Note 8.  Contingencies
From time to time the Company may be involved in litigation in the normal course of its business. The Company is not currently 
subject to any pending material legal proceedings.

Note 9.  Concentration
APUS students utilize various payment sources and programs to finance tuition. These programs include funds from DoD 
tuition assistance programs, education benefit programs administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, or VA,  
and federal student aid from Title IV programs, as well as cash and other sources. Reductions in or changes to DoD tuition 
assistance, VA education benefits, Title IV programs and other payment sources could have a significant impact on the 
Company’s operations. As of December 31, 2014 approximately 52% of APUS students self-reported that they served in the 
military on active duty at the time of initial enrollment. Active duty military students generally take fewer classes per year 
on average than non-military students.

A summary of APEI Segment revenues derived from students by primary funding source for the years ended December 31, 2012, 
2013 and 2014 is as follows:

Title IV programs
DoD tuition assistance programs
VA education benefits
Cash and other sources

2012

36%
38%
13%
13%

2013

38%
34%
16%
12%

2014

36%
35%
18%
11%

As of December 31, 2014 approximately 3% of the HCON Segment’s revenues were derived from students who were eligible  
for veteran’s education benefits and approximately 83% of the HCON Segment’s revenues were derived from students who 
received federal student aid.

A reduction in or change to any of these programs could have a significant impact on the Company’s operations and  
financial condition.

Note 10. Segment Information
On November 1, 2013, APEI acquired HCON and subsequently revised the Company’s segment reporting to maintain consis-
tency with the method management uses to evaluate performance and allocate resources, as well as to provide additional 
information to shareholders. Accordingly, the Company has identified two operating segments that are managed in the 
following reportable segments:

•  American Public Education Segment, or APEI Segment

•  Hondros College of Nursing Segment, or HCON Segment

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, the chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the  
Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources  
and assessing performance for APEI and HCON.

147

FORM 10-KA summary of financial information by reportable segment is as follows (in thousands):

Revenue

American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment

Total Revenue
Depreciation and Amortization

American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment

Total Depreciation and Amortization
Income from continuing operations before  

interest income and income taxes
American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment

Total income from continuing operations  

before interest income and income taxes

Capital Expenditures

American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment

Total Capital Expenditures

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2013

2014

$313,516
—
$313,516

11,146
—
11,146

$68,802
—

$68,802

$35,014
—
$35,014

$325,678
3,801
$329,479

13,344
164
13,508

$67,161
276

$67,437

$20,642
7
$20,649

$319,879
30,141
$350,020

14,859
1,262
16,121

$62,499
3,333

$65,832

$24,273
323
$24,596

A summary of the Company’s consolidated assets by reportable segment is as follows (in thousands):

Assets

American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment

Total Assets

Year Ended December 31,

2012

2013

2014

$237,603
—
$237,603

$221,426
50,229
$271,655

$245,544
52,360
$297,904

Note 11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill in the amount of $38.6 million was recorded in connection with the acquisition of HCON by the Company on 
November 1, 2013. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the amount assigned to the net assets acquired 
and the fair value assigned to identified intangible assets. In addition to goodwill, HCON recorded identified intangible assets 
with an indefinite useful life in the aggregate amount of $3.7 million, which includes trade names, accreditation, licensing and 
Title IV, and affiliate agreements.

148

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.At the acquisition date, the fair value assigned to identified intangible assets with a definite useful life was $4.4 million. 
Identified intangible assets with a definite life are as follows:

Student contracts and relationships
Curricula
Non-compete agreements

The future amortization of intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019 and beyond
Total

Useful Life

6 years
3 years
5 years

$   894
710
598
563
322
$3,087

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment during fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 are as follows 
(in thousands):

Goodwill as of December 31, 2013
Goodwill acquired(1)
Impairment
Section 338(h)(10) adjustment

Goodwill as of December 31, 2014

APEI Segment

HCON Segment

Total Goodwill

$—
—
—
—
$—

$38,148
—
—
486
$38,634

$38,148
—
—
486
$38,634

(1)  On November 1, 2013, the Company acquired Hondros College of Nursing, which resulted in recognizing $38.6 million of goodwill and $8.1 million 

in other identifiable intangible assets. The Company intends to conduct an annual impairment test on each anniversary date of the acquisition. 
For additional information please refer to Note 2, “Acquisition Accounting” of these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table presents the components of the net carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment as of December 31, 
2014 (in thousands):

Gross carrying amount of Goodwill  

as of December 31, 2014

Accumulated impairment
Net Carrying amount of Goodwill  

as of December 31, 2014

APEI Segment

HCON Segment

Total Goodwill

$—
—

$—

$38,634
—

$38,634

$38,634
—

$38,634

149

FORM 10-KOther intangible assets consist of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):

Finite-lived intangible assets

Curricula
Non-compete agreements
Student contracts and relationships

Total finite-lived intangible assets

Indefinite-lived intangible assets

Trade name
Accreditation, licensing and Title IV
Affiliation agreements

Total indefinite-lived intangible assets

Total intangible assets

Gross Carrying  
Amount

2014

Accumulated 
Amortization

Net Carrying  
Amount

$   405
86
3,870
4,361

1,998
1,686
37
3,721
$8,082

$   158
20
1,096
1,274

—
—
—
—
$1,274

$   247
66
2,774
3,087

1,998
1,686
37
3,721
$6,808

Identified intangible assets are amortized in a manner that reflects the estimated economic benefit of the intangible assets. 
Curricula and Non-compete agreements are amortized on a straight-line basis. Student contracts and relationships are amor-
tized using an accelerated method.

Note 12. Subsequent Events
The Company has reviewed its business activities and has no subsequent events to report.

150

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Note 13. Quarterly Financial Summary (unaudited)
The following unaudited consolidated interim financial information presented should be read in conjunction with other informa-
tion included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the following unaudited 
consolidated financial information reflects all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the results of interim periods. 
The Company acquired HCON on November 1, 2013, and therefore the consolidated results for periods prior to November 1, 2013 
do not include any results from HCON. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be 
expected for future periods. The following tables set forth selected unaudited quarterly financial information for each of the 
Company’s last eight quarters:

(in thousands, except per share data)

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter

4th Quarter

2014
Revenues
Income before income taxes
Net income
Net income per common share:

Basic
Diluted

2013
Revenues
Income before income taxes
Net income
Net income per common share:

Basic
Diluted

$88,553
16,806
10,436

$    0.59
$    0.59

$83,840
18,274
11,376

$    0.64
$    0.63

$85,463
15,933
9,802

$    0.56
$    0.56

$80,925
17,291
10,750

$    0.61
$    0.60

$84,708
14,745
8,842

$    0.51
$    0.51

$81,777
17,584
10,911

$    0.62
$    0.61

$91,297
18,709
11,797

$    0.69
$    0.68

$82,937
14,597
8,997

$    0.51
$    0.51

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants  
on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and the participation of our management, including our principal 
executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and 
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the 
Securities Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2014. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal 
financial officer concluded that, as of the end of that period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing 
reasonable assurance that (a) the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the 
Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities 
and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (b) such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, 
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding 
required disclosure.

151

FORM 10-KChanges in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by 
Rules 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2014 that has materially affected or is reasonably 
likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

152

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the 
Company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive 
and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide 
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external 
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

•  pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions 

of the assets of the company;

•  provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in 
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being 
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

•  provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the 

company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. 
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate 
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management 
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, 
our management used the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring 
Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting is 
effective based on those criteria.

Our independent auditors, McGladrey LLP, have issued an audit report on our internal control over financial reporting. This report 
appears below.

153

FORM 10-KReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders 
American Public Education, Inc.

We have audited American Public Education, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 
2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring 
Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. American Public Education, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible 
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control 
over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. 
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). 
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal 
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal 
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and 
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures 
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the 
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally 
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that 
(a) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions 
of the assets of the company; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit prepara-
tion of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of 
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (c) 
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the 
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, 
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate 
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, American Public Education, Inc and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control 
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued 
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 
consolidated balance sheets of American Public Education, Inc and its Subsidiaries’ as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the 
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 
December 31, 2014, and our report dated February 26, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ McGladrey LLP

McLean, VA 
February 26, 2015

154

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Item 9B. Other Information
None.

155

FORM 10-KPART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

Executive Officers
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, information regarding our executive officers is set forth in Part I of this 
Annual Report under the caption Item 1. “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

Code of Ethics
As part of our system of corporate governance, our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that 
is applicable to all of our employees, and also contains provisions only applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and senior 
financial officers. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Corporate Governance page of our website at 
http://www.americanpubliceducation.com. We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K 
regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our chief 
executive officer or senior financial officers, by posting such information on our website at the address above. The information 
on our website is expressly not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Additional Information
The additional information regarding directors, executive officers and corporate governance required by this Item is hereby 
incorporated by reference from the information contained under the captions “Corporate Governance Standards and Director 
Independence,” “Board Committees and Their Functions,” “Director Nominations and Communication with Directors,” “Proposal 
No. 1—Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting and Compliance” in the Company’s Proxy 
Statement, which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days following December 31, 2014 with respect to our 2015 Annual 
Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information contained under the captions 
“Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation” in the Company’s Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following December 31, 2014 with respect to our 2015 Annual 
Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and  
Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information contained under the captions 
“Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Company’s Proxy Statement, 
which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following December 31, 2014 with 
respect to our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

156

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,  

and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information contained under the captions 
“Certain Relationships and Related Persons Transactions” and “Board Independence” in the Company’s Proxy Statement, which 
will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following December 31, 2014 with respect to 
our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by reference from the information contained under the captions 
“Principal Accountant Fees and Services” and “Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures” in the Company’s Proxy 
Statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following December 31, 
2014 with respect to our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

157

FORM 10-KPART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule

(a)  List of documents filed as part of this Annual Report:

(1)  The required financial statements are included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.

(2)  The required financial statement schedules are included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.

(3)  A complete listing of exhibits is included in the Index to Exhibits.

(b)  A complete listing of exhibits is included in the Index to Exhibits.

(c)  Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

Other schedules are omitted because they are not required.

158

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Schedule II

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Year ended December 31, 2014:
American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment
Allowance for receivables

Year ended December 31, 2013:
American Public Education Segment
Hondros College of Nursing Segment
Allowance for receivables

Year ended December 31, 2012:
American Public Education Segment
Allowance for receivables

Balance at  
Beginning of Period

Additions/
(Reductions)(1)

Write-Offs

Balance at  
End of Period

$11,452
1,723
13,175

$11,106
—
$11,106

$  4,996
$  4,996

$17,480
1,344
18,824

$14,011
1,723
$15,734

$13,610
$13,610

$(20,471)
(829)
(21,300)

$(13,665)
—
$(13,665)

$  (7,500)
$  (7,500)

$  8,461
2,238
10,699

$11,452
1,723
$13,175

$11,106
$11,106

(1)  Hondros College of Nursing additions include $1.461 million beginning balance as of November 1, 2013.

159

FORM 10-KSignatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this 
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: February 26, 2015

American Public Education, Inc.

By:

/s/ Dr. Wallace E. Boston

Name: Dr. Wallace E. Boston
Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons 
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Name

/s/ Dr. Wallace E. Boston
Dr. Wallace E. Boston

Date

Title

February 26, 2015

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Richard W. Sunderland, Jr.
Richard W. Sunderland, Jr.

February 26, 2015

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

February 26, 2015

Chairman of the Board of Directors

February 26, 2015

Director

February 26, 2015

Director

February 26, 2015

Director

February 26, 2015

Director

February 26, 2015

Director

February 26, 2015

Director

/s/ Timothy T. Weglicki
Timothy T. Weglicki

/s/ Eric C. Andersen
Eric C. Andersen

/s/ Barbara G. Fast
Barbara G. Fast

/s/ Jean C. Halle
Jean C. Halle

/s/ Barbara Kurshan
Barbara Kurshan

/s/ Timothy J. Landon
Timothy J. Landon

/s/ Wes Moore
Wes Moore

160

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Index To Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Exhibit Description

3.1

3.2

4.1

10.1+

10.2+

10.3+

10.4+

Fifth Amended Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company(1)

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company(1)

Form of certificate representing the Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the Company(2)

American Public Education, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended(2)

American Public Education, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan(2)

Form of Indemnification Agreement with directors and executive officers(2)

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated April 28, 2014, by and between American Public University 

System, Inc., American Public Education, Inc. and Wallace E. Boston, Jr.(3)

10.5+

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated April 28, 2014, by and among American Public University 

System, Inc., American Public Education, Inc. and Harry T. Wilkins(3)

10.6+

Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2014 by and among American Public University System, Inc., American Public 

Education, Inc. and Carol Gilbert(4)

10.7+

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2014, by and among American Public University 

System, Inc., American Public Education, Inc. and Karan Powell(4)

10.8+

Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2014, by and among American Public University System, Inc., American 

Public Education, Inc. and Richard W. Sunderland, Jr.(4)

10.9+

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2014, by and among American Public University 

System, Inc., American Public Education, Inc. and Sharon van Wyk(4)

10.10+

American Public Education, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan(2)

10.10a+

Amendment to the American Public Education, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan(5)

10.11+

10.12+

10.13

21.1

23.1

31.1

31.2

32.1

American Public Education, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan(6)

APUS Non-Qualified Plan(7)

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 28, 2013, by and among, the Company National Education Seminars, Inc., 

the Selling Stockholders, the Founders and the Stockholder Representative(8)

List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith)

Consent of McGladrey LLP (filed herewith)

Certification of Chief Executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as 

adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as 

adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906  

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

161

FORM 10-KExhibit No.

Exhibit Description

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906  

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

EX-101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

EX-101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

EX-101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

EX-101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

EX-101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

EX-101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Unless otherwise noted, all exhibits are incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-1 Registration Statement  
(No. 333-145185), as amended.

+  Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(1)  Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-33810), filed with the Commission  

on November 14, 2007.

(2)  Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-145185).
(3)  Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-33810), filed with the Commission  

on May 2, 2014.

(4)  Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014  

(File No. 001-33810), filed with the Commission on August 5, 2014.

(5)  Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-33810), filed with the Commission  

on June 17, 2014.

(6)  Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Registrant’s 2011 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-33810), filed  

with the Commission on March 22, 2011.

(7)  Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013  

(File No. 001-33810), filed with the Commission on February 27, 2014.

(8)  Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended  

September 30, 2013 (File No. 001-33810), filed with the Commission on November 5, 2013.

162

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries

Entity

American Public University System, Inc.
National Education Seminars, Inc.

State of Organization

West Virginia
Ohio

163

FORM 10-KExhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (333-197086, 333-174105, 333-151789, and  
333-150454) on Form S-8 of American Public Education, Inc. of our reports dated February 26, 2015, relating to our audits  
of the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule and internal control over financial reporting, 
which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Public Education, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended 
December 31, 2014.

/s/ McGladrey LLP

McLean, Virginia 
February 26, 2015

164

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Wallace E. Boston, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Public Education, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact 

necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not 
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all 
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods 
presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and 

procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined 
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under 
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is 
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be 

designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the 
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our 

conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this 
report based on such evaluation; and

d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the 
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has 
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over 
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons 
performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting 
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial 
information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the 

registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  

February 26, 2015

By:

/s/ Dr. Wallace E. Boston

Name: Dr. Wallace E. Boston
Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

165

FORM 10-KExhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Richard W. Sunderland, Jr., certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Public Education, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact 

necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not 
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all 
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods 
presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and 

procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined 
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under 
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is 
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be 

designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the 
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our 

conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this 
report based on such evaluation; and

d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the 
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has 
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over 
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons 
performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting 
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial 
information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the 

registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  

February 26, 2015

By:

/s/ Richard W. Sunderland, Jr.

Name:
Title:

Richard W. Sunderland, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

166

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of American Public Education, Inc. (“the Company”), hereby certifies that, to his 
knowledge, on the date hereof:

(a)  The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2013 filed on the date hereof with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations 

of the Company.

Date:  

February 26, 2015

By:

/s/ Dr. Wallace E. Boston

Name: Dr. Wallace E. Boston
Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or 
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required  
by Section 906, has been provided to American Public Education, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to  
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

167

FORM 10-KExhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of American Public Education, Inc. (“the Company”), hereby certifies that, to his 
knowledge, on the date hereof:

(a)  The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2013 filed on the date hereof with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations 

of the Company.

Date:  

February 26, 2015

By:

/s/ Richard W. Sunderland, Jr.

Name:
Title:

Richard W. Sunderland, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or 
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required  
by Section 906, has been provided to American Public Education, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to  
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

168

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.This page intentionally left blank.

169

FORM 10-KLEADERSHIP TEAMS

Dr. Patricia Campbell 
Vice President and  
Assistant Provost, 
Graduate Studies,  
Research & Innovation 

Dr. Jennifer Stephens-Helm 
Assistant Provost,  
Assessment and Accreditation

Melissa Frey 
Vice President, Finance Operations

Jeffrey McCafferty 
Vice President, Strategic Planning

Robert Funk 
Vice President,  
Application Development 

Amy Panzarella, SPHR, SHRM-SCP 
Vice President, Human Resources 

Caroline Simpson 
Vice President, Student Services

Jim Sweizer 
Vice President, Military Relations

HONDROS COLLEGE  
OF NURSING

Harry Wilkins, CPA 
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Development Officer, 
American Public Education, Inc.

Chief Executive Officer,  
Hondros College of Nursing 

Carol Thomas 
President, Hondros College  
of Nursing

Dan Benjamin 
Dean, School of Science, 
Technology, Engineering and Math

Claudine Stubblefield 
Vice President, Controller

Dr. G. Wynn Berry 
Vice President and Dean,  
Program Development

Brian Freeland 
Dean, School of Health Sciences

Lyn Geer 
Vice President, Registrar

Dr. Linda Moynihan 
Dean, School of Arts and Humanities

Dr. Chad Patrizi 
Dean, School of Business

Dr. Chris Reynolds 
Vice President, Academic 
Communication and Outreach

Dr. Mark Riccardi 
Dean, School of Security  
and Global Studies

Dr. Tammy Woody 
Dean, School of Education

FINANCE, INFORMATION  
TECHNOLOGY AND  
HUMAN RESOURCES

Richard Sunderland, Jr., CPA 
Executive Vice President and  
Chief Financial Officer 

Peter Gibbons 
Senior Vice President and  
Chief Administrative Officer

Michael Miotto 
Senior Vice President and  
Chief Information Officer

Chris Symanoskie 
Vice President, Investor Relations 

Amy Weber 
Vice President, Internal Audit

Keith Wellings 
Vice President, Financial Aid  
and Compliance

Michael White, CPA 
Vice President, Budgeting,  
Tax and Facilities Management 

Tracy Woods 
Vice President, Technology 
Operations and Services

MARKETING,  
ENROLLMENT AND  
STUDENT SERVICES

Carol Gilbert 
Executive Vice President, 
Programs and Marketing 

Elizabeth LaGuardia Cooper 
Vice President, Marketing 

Terry Grant 
Vice President, Enrollment 
Management and Student Support

Mike Harbert 
Vice President, Strategic Markets  
and Relationships

Paul Humphreys 
Consultant, International 
Development

AMERICAN PUBLIC 
UNIVERSITY SYSTEM

OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 

Dr. Wallace Boston 
President and  
Chief Executive Officer

Thomas Beckett 
Vice President, Legal Affairs

Dr. John Hough 
Vice President,  
Community Relations

Dr. Philip Ice 
Vice President,  
Research and Development 

Dr. Russell Kitchner 
Vice President, Regulatory and 
Government Relations 

Lynn Wright 
Vice President,  
Ombudsman

ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP 

Dr. Karan Powell 
Executive Vice President  
and Provost

Dr. Gwendolyn Hall 
Senior Vice President and  
Associate Provost

Dr. Conrad Lotze 
Senior Vice President  
and Associate Provost,  
Academic Affairs 

Michael Netzer 
Senior Vice President and  
Associate Provost, Academic 
Program Development & Outreach

Hedi BenAicha 
Vice President and  
Assistant Provost, 
Library & Academic Resources

170

AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION, INC.CORPORATE INFORMATION

Corporate and Administrative Offices
American Public Education, Inc.
111 West Congress Street
Charles Town, WV 25414
Phone: (304) 724-3700
Toll Free: (877) 468-6268

Stock Exchange Listing 
The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol 
“APEI”.

Annual Shareholder Meeting 
The Annual Meeting of American Public Education, Inc. 
shareholders will be held at the Gaylord National Resort  
& Conference Center, 201 Waterfront Street, National 
Harbor, Maryland 20745 on June 12, 2015 at 7:30 a.m. ET. 

Investor Relations 
Chris Symanoskie 
Vice President, Investor Relations 
American Public Education, Inc. 
111 West Congress Street 
Charles Town, WV 25414 
Phone: (703) 334-3880  
csymanoskie@apus.edu 

Accountants 
McGladrey LLP 
1861 International Drive, Suite 400 
McLean, VA 22102 
Phone: (703) 336-6400

Transfer Agent 
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company 
6201 15th Avenue 
Brooklyn, NY 11219 
Attn: Shareholder Services 
Toll Free: (800) 937-5449

Online Information 
Investor Relations 
www.AmericanPublicEducation.com

APUS Board of Trustees

APEI Board of Directors

Eric C. “Ric” Andersen, Director 
Partner, Milestone Partners

Dr. Wallace E. Boston, Director 
President and Chief Executive Officer, 
American Public Education, Inc. 

Major General (Retired)  
Barbara G. Fast, Director 
Senior Vice President, CGI Federal

Jean C. Halle, Director 
Independent Consultant

Dr. Barbara L. “Bobbi” Kurshan, 
Director 
Executive Director and Senior Fellow, 
Academic Innovation, University of 
Pennsylvania Graduate School of 
Education 

Timothy J. Landon, Director 
CEO, Aggrego, LLC

Wes Moore, Director 
Author, Chairman of Omari 
Productions 

Timothy T. Weglicki, Chair 
Founding Partner, ABS Capital 
Partners

Frank Ball, Chair 
Independent Consultant 

Faculty Member,  
Georgetown University

Dr. Wallace E. Boston, Member 
President and Chief Executive Officer, 
American Public Education, Inc. 

General (Retired)  
Alfred M. Gray,  
Chairman Emeritus and Member 
Chairman, Board of Regents, 
Potomac Institute for Policy Studies 

Chancellor, Marine Military Academy

29th Commandant of the Marine Corps

Dr. Lucie Lapovsky, Member 
Principal, Lapovsky Consulting

Former President, Mercy College

Dr. Katy E. Marre, Member 
Professor, University of Dayton

Former Assoc. Vice President, 
Graduate Studies and Research, 
University of Dayton

Major General (Retired)  
Robert L. Nabors, Member 
Executive Advisor,  
Booz Allen Hamilton

Vice Admiral (Retired)  
Dr. Ann E. Rondeau, Vice-Chair 
Independent Consultant 

Lieutenant General (Retired)  
Richard G. Trefry, Member 
Senior Fellow, Institute of  
Land Warfare

Former Program Manager, The Army 
Force Management School

Dr. Katherine Zatz, Member 
Vice President, Allpar LLC

Member, Registry of College 
Presidents

m
o
c
.
e
v
i
t
a
e
r
c
c
f
.

i

w
w
w

D
M

,
a
d
s
e
h
t
e
B

e
v
i
t
a
e
r

C

I

C
F
:
n
g
s
e
D

i

.
c
n
I

,
n
o
i
t
a
c
u
d
E
c

i
l

b
u
P
n
a
c
i
r
e
m
A
5
1
0
2
©

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
111 WEST CONGRESS STREET‚ CHARLES TOWN‚ WEST VIRGINIA 25414 

www.americanpubliceducation.com

VISIT OUR SOCIAL COMMUNITIES FOR APUS, AMU & APU  
www.apus.edu/communities

VISIT OUR SOCIAL COMMUNITIES FOR HONDROS COLLEGE OF NURSING
facebook.com/HondrosCollegeNursingPrograms 
twitter.com/HondrosNursing