Quarterlytics / Real Estate / REIT - Mortgage / Annaly Capital Management

Annaly Capital Management

nly · NYSE Real Estate
Claim this profile
Ticker nly
Exchange NYSE
Sector Real Estate
Industry REIT - Mortgage
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2000 Annual Report · Annaly Capital Management
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annaly  Mor tgage  Management, Inc.
A n n u a l   R e p o r t   2 0 0 0

In the year 2000, the
Company Experienced
Substantial Appreciation
in Book Value

Book Value Comparison

0
6
.
7
$

4
8
.
7
$

7
7
.
7
$

0
3
.
8
$

4
3
.
9
$

$10

$8

$6

$4

$2

0

12/31 3/31 6/30 9/30

12/31/00

2000 Dividend Yield and 
Return on Average Equity 

%
6
5
.
5
1

%
8
2
.
8
1

%
2
5
.
3
1

%
0
.
4
1

%
6
9
.
0
1

%
9
2
.
3
1

%
3
0
.
1
1

%
8
0
.
2
1

24%

18%

12%

6%

0

3/31

6/30

9/30

12/31

Dividend Yield
Return on Average Equity

Annaly provided 
double-digit returns
and yields for all four
quarters of 2000.

T i m o t h y   J . G u b a

J a m e s   P. F o r t e s c u e  

K a t h r y n   F. F a g a n

J e n n i f e r   A . S t e p h e n s

We l l i n g t o n   J . S t . C l a i r e

M i c h a e l   A . J . F a r r e l l

R o s e   M a r i e   M i l l e r

K r i s t o p h e r   R . K o n r a d

To Our Fellow Shareholders:

To Our Fellow 

from.The past several years have been among the rough-

est  bond  investment  climate  in  my  career. Wall  Street  is

now littered with discredited technology deals, prominent

investment  professionals  who  have  retired  in  the  face  of

“irrational  exuberance” and  the  task  of  cleaning  up  the

excesses of the last decade lies ahead

During  the  course  of  the  year, we  always  receive 

a number of inquiries asking the origin of the Company’s

name and the history behind it. I thought this year’s letter

offers  an  opportunity  to  discuss  the  Company, its  results

and  tie  it  all  together  with  a  sense  of  balance  against 

its history.

In  the  remarkable  four-year  history  of  the  firm, Annaly

My parents came to this country in 1948, from Dublin,

has been recognized as the top performing Company in

Ireland. My father, who served as a combat tank driver in

its  discipline. It  has, since  inception, generated  a  consis-

the British army’s Irish Guards during the War, left his late

tently positive earnings stream. It has prudently deployed

term pregnant wife in Dublin to come to New York and

its resources to take advantage of each opportunity as the

joined  the  thousands  of  immigrants  from  all  nations 

years have gone by. In year 2000, the Company’s manage-

who  were  laborers  building  post WWII  New York. My

ment was challenged early on to repeat its 1999 perform-

mother, after giving birth to my older brother in Dublin,

ance  where  it  outperformed  a  growth  stock  loaded

came to America a few months later, traveling alone with

Standard and Poor’s Index by over a full percentage point.

her baby on the maiden voyage of the Queen Mary.They

There  were  many  in  the  investment  community  that

came  to America, raised  a  family, prospered  as  so  many

doubted  the  ability  of  the  Company, recognized  as  a

other immigrants have.

value/income  vehicle, to  beat  the  Index  two  years  in  a

In medieval times, the Farrell clan was a leading family

row. As 2000 closed out, the jury is in and the verdict is

in  the  county  of  Longford, Ireland. The  ancestral  home

out.Annaly outperformed the index by 26%.The promise

was called Annaly.The crest that we use in our marketing

we have made to investors since inception has been and

materials is the Farrell family crest.

will continue to be met.

When we were exploring the capital markets in bring-

I  say  this  with  some  degree  of  confidence, but  it  is

ing a real estate investment trust to the development stage,

important  to  understand  where  that  confidence  comes

it seemed logical to somehow try to link it to property so

| two |

Shareholders

Annaly became the “project development” surname. Since

that they have been succeeding in such a brutal climate for

our  investment  activities  center  around  government

so long that they are only now beginning to realize what

issued, residential  mortgage  securities, the  name  stuck  as

my parents realized so long ago.After years of dealing with

we  began  bringing  the  Company  through  the  critical

the  Depression, then War  they  set  their  sights  on  new

stages of being funded and going public.

opportunities. They arrived at a time in their lives when

The  performance  of  our  Company’s  management  has

they  left  behind  everything  that  they  were  comfortable

been  remarkable. Since  inception, the  Company  has 

with, looked ahead and believed what I believe today;

provided  double-digit  returns  to  shareholders. The  team

The best is yet to come.

was able to provide shareholders with a 12.96% dividend

yield  for  the  year  and  an  appreciation  in  book  value  of

33%. Time  after  time  I  have  watched  them  rise  to  the

occasion,

identify  and  meet  the  challenge  and  move

ahead. No compromises in investment philosophy. No dis-

Michael A.J. Farrell

tractions from the task at hand.What is most interesting is

March 17, 2001

| three |

Annaly’s Management Team

Teamwork

Michael Farrell,

Chairman & CEO,

oversees daily 

trading activity

Rose Marie Miller,

Assistant Portfolio Manager

Wellington St. Claire,

Vice Chairman and 

Chief Portfolio Manager

Stability

James Fortescue,

Repurchase 

Agreement Trader

Senior Management brings to Annaly an average of 18 years of

and  capitalized  Annaly  Mortgage  Management,

Inc.

in

Wall  Street  trading, management  and  operations  experience,

November 1996. Successfully completing a Private Placement in

with a specialization in mortgage securities.This Group founded

February 1997, an IPO in October 1997 and a secondary offer-

| four |

Tim Guba,

President

Patience

Wellington and 

James discussing 

trading strategies

Trust

Kathryn Fagan, Chief

Financial Officer

Integrity

Jennifer Stephens, Secretary

and Portfolio Manager and

Kris Konrad, Portfolio

Manager executing a trade

ing  in  January  2001, Annaly  has  consistently  generated 

the  ability  of  its  strong  and  seasoned  management  team  to 

double-digit  returns  for  its  shareholders. Annaly  Mortgage

deliver these excellent results in the extremely volatile markets.

Management’s success, and future growth prospects are based on

| five |

Corporate Prof ile

Annaly  Mortgage  Management, Inc  owns  and  manages  a 
portfolio of mortgage-backed securities. Our principal business
objective  is  to  generate  net  income  for  distribution  to  our
stockholders  from  the  spread  between  the  interest  income 
on  our  mortgage-backed  securities  and  costs  of  borrowing  to

finance our acquisition of mortgage-backed securities.We have
elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (or REIT)
under the Internal Revenue Code. We commenced operations
on February 18, 1997.We are self-advised and self-managed.

Financial Highlights

(dollars in thousands, except for per share data)

Statement of Operations Data:

Days in period
Interest income
Interest expense

Net interest income
Gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities
General and administrative expenses (G&A expense)

Net income

Basic net income per average share
Diluted net income per average share
Dividends declared per average share

Balance Sheet Data:

Mortgage-Backed Securities, net
Total assets
Repurchase agreements
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Number of common shares outstanding

Other Data:

Average total assets
Average earning assets
Average borrowings
Average equity
Yield on interest earning assets 
Cost of funds on interest bearing liabilities 
Interest rate spread

Annualized Financial Ratios:

Net interest margin (net interest income/average total assets)
G&A expense as a percentage of average assets
G&A expense as a percentage of average equity
Return on average assets
Return on average equity

(1)Ratios for the 317-day period ended 

December 31, 1997 have been annualized.

For the 
Year Ended 
December 31, 2000

For the 
Year Ended
December 31, 1999

For the 
Year Ended 
December 31, 1998

February 18, 1997
(commencement
of operations)
through

December 31, 1997(1)

365
109,750
92,902

16,848
2,025
2,286

16,587

1.18
1.15
1.15

$

$

$

$
$
$

$ 1,978,219
2,035,029
1,628,359
1,899,386
135,642
14,522,978

$ 1,652,459
1,564,491
1,449,999
117,727
7.02%
6.41%
0.61%

1.02%
0.14%
1.94%
1.00%
14.09%

365
89,812
69,846

19,966
454
2,281

18,139

1.41
1.35
1.38

$

$

$

$
$
$

$ 1,437,793
1,491,322
1,338,296
1,388,050
103,272
13,581,316

$ 1,473,765
1,461,254
1,350,230
117,685
6.15%
5.17%
0.98%

1.35%
0.15%
1.94%
1.23%
15.41%

365
89,986
75,735

14,251
3,344
2,106

15,489

1.22
1.19
1.21

$

$

$

$
$
$

$ 1,520,289
1,527,352
1,280,510
1,401,481
125,871
12,648,424

$ 1,499,875
1,461,791
1,360,040
131,265
6.16%
5.57%
0.59%

0.95%
0.14%
1.60%
1.03%
11.80%

317
24,713
19,677

5,036 
735
852

4,919

0.83
0.80
0.79

$

$

$

$
$
$

$ 1,161,779
1,167,740
918,869
1,032,654
135,086
12,713,900

$

476,855
448,306
404,140
61,096
6.34%
5.61%
0.73%

1.22%
0.21%
1.61%
1.19%
9.27%

| six |

Financial ReviewManagement’s Discussion and 

| eight |

Analysis of Financial Condition 
and Result of Operations

| seventeen |

Statements of Financial Condition

| eighteen |

Statements of Operations

| nineteen |

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

| twenty |

Statement of Cash Flows

| twenty-one |

Notes to Financial Statements

| twenty-six |

Independent Auditors Report

| twenty-seven |

Common Stock and Market Information

| twenty-eight |

Corporate Information

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operation

Overview
We are a real estate investment trust that owns and manages a portfolio
of  mortgage-backed  securities. Our  principal  business  objective  is  to
generate net income for distribution to our stockholders from the spread
between  the  interest  income  on  our  mortgage-backed  securities  and 
the costs of borrowing to finance our acquisition of mortgage-backed
securities.

We  commenced  operations  on  February  18, 1997  upon  the 
consummation of a private placement. We completed our initial public
offering on October 14, 1997.The 317-day period ended December 31,
1997 was a short operating period and not a full twelve months.

Results of Operations 

Net Income Summary
For  the  year  ended  December  31, 2000, our  GAAP  net  income  was
$16.6 million, or $1.18 basic earnings per average share, as compared to
$18.1  million, or  $1.41  basic  earnings  per  average  share  for  the  year

Net Income Summary

ended December 31, 1999. For the year ended December 31, 1998, our
GAAP net income was $15.5 million, or $1.22 basic earnings per aver-
age share.We compute our GAAP net income per share by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of shares of outstanding com-
mon stock during the period, which was 14,089,436 for the year ended
December 31, 2000, 12,889,510 for the year ended December 31, 1999,
and 12,709,116 for the year ended December 31, 1998. Dividends per
weighted  average  number  of  shares  outstanding  for  the  year  ended
December  31, 2000  was  $1.15  per  share, or  $16.3  million  in  total.
Dividends  per  weighted  average  number  of  shares  outstanding  for  the
year  ended  December  31, 1999  was  $1.39  per  share, or  $18.0 
million  in  total. Dividends  per  weighted  average  number  of  shares 
outstanding for the year ended December 31, 1998 was $1.22 per share,
or $15.4 million in total. Our return on average equity was 14.09% for
the  year  ended  December  31, 2000, 15.41%  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 1999, and 11.80% year ended December 31, 1998. The
table  below  presents  the  net  income  summary  for  the  years  ended
December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, the period ended December 31, 1997.

(dollars in thousands,except per share data)

Interest Income
Interest Expense

Net Interest Income
Gain on Sale of Mortgage-Backed Securities
General and Administrative Expenses
Net Income

Average Number of Basic Shares Outstanding
Average Number of Diluted Shares Outstanding

Basic Net Income Per Share
Diluted Net Income Per Share

Average Total Assets
Average Equity

Annualized Return on Average Assets

Annualized Return on Average Equity

Year Ended
December 31,
2000

Year Ended
December 31,
1999

Year Ended
December 31,
1998

Year Ended
December 31,
1997

$

$

$

109,750
92,902

16,802
2,025
2,286
16,587

14,089,436
14,377,459

$
$

1.18
1.15

$ 1,652,459
117,727

1.00%

14.09%

$

$

$

89,812
69,846

19,966
454
2,281
18,139

12,889,510
13,454,007

$
$

1.41
1.35

$ 1,473,765
117,685

1.23%

15.41%

$

$

$

$
$

89,986
75,735

14,251
3,344
2,106
15,489

12,709,116
13,020,648

1.22
1.19

$

$

$

$
$

24,713
19,677

5,036 
735
852
4,919

5,952,126
6,300,623

0.83
0.80

$ 1,499,875
131,265

$ 476,855
61,096

1.03%

11.80%

1.19%

9.27%

Taxable Income and GAAP Income
For  the  years  ended  December  31, 2000, 1999, and  1998  our  income 
as calculated for tax purposes (taxable income) differed from income as
calculated according to GAAP (GAAP income). Our taxable income for
the  year  ended  December  31, 2000  was  approximately  $15.7  million,
or  $1.11  per  share, as  compared  to  taxable  income  of  $18.4 
million, or $1.43 per share, for the year ended December 31, 1999.The 
differences were in the calculations of premium and discount amortiza-
tion, gains  on  sale  of  mortgage-backed  securities, and  general  and 
administrative expenses.

The  distinction  between  taxable  income  and  GAAP  income  is
important  to  our  stockholders  because  dividends  are  declared  on  the
basis of taxable income.While we do not pay taxes so long as we satisfy
the  requirements  for  exemption  from  taxation  pursuant  to  the  REIT
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, each year we complete a cor-
porate tax form on which taxable income is calculated as if we were to
be taxed.This taxable income level determines the amount of dividends
we can pay out over time.The table below presents the major differences
between  our  GAAP  and  taxable  income  for  the  years  ended 
December  31, 2000, 1999, and  1998, the  period  ended  December  31,
1997, and the four quarters in 2000.

| eight |

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

Taxable Income

(dollars in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
For the Period Ended December 31, 1997

For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2000
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2000

GAAP Net
Income

$16,587
$ 18,139
$ 15,489
$ 4,919

$ 4,094
$ 3,806
$ 3,839
$ 4,848

Taxable 
General &
Administrative
Differences

Taxable
Mortgage
Amortization
Differences

Taxable Gain
on Sale of
Securities
Differences

$ 8
$ 9
$ 6
$ 3

—
$ 6
$ 1
$ 1

$ (503)
$ 814
$ 959
$ (92)

$ 116
$ (156)
$ (167)
$ (296)

$ (392)
$ (525)
23
$
54
$

$ (32)
$ (283)
$ (79)
2
$

Taxable Net 
Income

$ 15,700
$ 18,437
$ 16,477
$ 4,884

$ 4,178
$ 3,373
$ 3,594
$ 4,555

Interest Income and Average Earning Asset Yield
We  had  average  earning  assets  of  $1.6  billion  for  the  year  ended
December  31, 2000. We  had  average  earning  assets  of  $1.5  billion  for
both years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998. Our primary source of
income  for  the  years  ended  December  31, 2000, 1999, and  1998  was
interest  income. A  portion  of  our  income  was  generated  by  gains  on 
the  sales  of  our  mortgage-backed  securities. Our  interest  income  was
$109.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $89.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 1999, and $90.0 million for the year ended
December  31, 1998. Our  yield  on  average  earning  assets  was  7.02%,
6.15%, and 6.16% for the same respective periods. Our yield on average
earning assets increased by 0.87% and our average earning asset balance
increased  by  $10.3  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31, 2000  as

compared  to  the  year  ended  December  31, 1999. Interest  income
increased to $19.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 over
prior year, due to the increase in average earning asset balance and yield.
Our  average  earning  asset  balance  decreased  by  $756,000  for  the  year
ended December 31, 1999 as compared to the year ended December 31,
1998. Interest  income  decreased  by  $174,000  for  the  year  ended
December  31, 1999  over  prior  year, due  to  the  slight  decline  in  the 
average  earning  asset  balance  and  yield. The  table  below  shows  our 
average balance of cash equivalents and mortgage-backed securities, the
yields  we  earned  on  each  type  of  earning  assets, our  yield  on  average
earning assets and our interest income for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998, and the period ended December 31, 1997, and the
four quarters in 2000.

Average Earning Asset Yield

(dollars in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
For the Period Ended December 31, 1997

For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2000
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2000

Average
Cash
Equivalents

$ 263
$ 221
$
2
$ 30

$ 394
$ 188
$ 243
$ 226

Average
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities

$ 1,564,228
$ 1,461,033
$ 1,461,789
448,276
$

$ 1,741,985
$ 1,590,497
$ 1,476,283
$ 1,448,148

Yield on 
Yield on
Average
Average  Mortgage-
Backed
Securities

Average 
Earning

Cash
Assets  Equivalents

$1,564,491
$ 1,461,254
$ 1,461,791
$ 448,306

$1,742,379
$1,590,685
$1,476,526
$1,448,374

4.18%
4.10%
4.32%
4.20%

5.08%
5.43%
3.29%
1.79%

7.02%
6.15 %
6.16 %
6.34 %

7.16%
7.10%
6.97%
6.80%

Yield on
Average
Earning
Assets 

7.02%
6.15 %
6.16 %
6.34 %

7.15%
7.10%
6.97%
6.80%

Interest
Income

$109,750
$ 89,812
$ 89,986
$ 24,713

$ 31,160
$ 28,239
$ 25,734
$ 24,617

The constant prepayment rate (or CPR) on our mortgage-backed secu-
rities for the year ended December 31, 2000 was 11%, for the year ended
December 31, 1999 was 18%, and for the year ended December 31, 1998
was  23%. CPR  is  an  assumed  rate  of  prepayment  for  our 
mortgage-backed securities, expressed as an annual rate of prepayment
relative  to  the  outstanding  principal  balance  of  our  mortgage-backed
securities. CPR  does  not  purport  to  be  either  a  historical  description 
of  the  prepayment  experience  of  our  mortgage-backed  securities  or  a
prediction  of  the  anticipated  rate  of  prepayment  of  our  mortgage-
backed securities.

Principal prepayments had a negative effect on our earning asset yield
for  the  years  ended  December  31, 2000, 1999  and  1998  because  we
adjust  our  rates  of  premium  amortization  and  discount  accretion 

monthly  based  upon  the  effective  yield  method, which  takes  into 
consideration changes in prepayment speeds.

Interest Expense and the Cost of Funds
We  anticipate  that  our  largest  expense  will  be  the  cost  of  borrowed
funds. We  had  average  borrowed  funds  of  $1.4  billion  for  the  years
ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. Interest expense totaled of
$92.9  million, $69.8  million  and  $75.7  million  for  the  years  ended
December  31, 2000, 1999  and  1998. Our  average  cost  of  funds  was
6.41% for the year ended December 31, 2000, 5.17% for the year ended
December 31, 1999 and 5.57% for the year ended December 31, 1998.
The  cost  of  funds  rate  increased  by  1.24%  and  the  average  borrowed
funds increased by $99.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000
when  compared  to  the  year  ended  December  31, 1999; consequently,

| nine |

interest expense increased by 33%. Our average cost of funds was 5.17%
for the year ended December 31, 1999 and 5.57% for the year ended
December  31, 1998. The  cost  of  funds  rate  declined  0.40%  and  the 
average  borrowed  funds  declined  by  $9.8  million  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 1999 when compared to the year ended December 31,
1998; consequently, interest expense decreased by 8%.

With our current asset/liability management strategy, changes in our
cost  of  funds  are  expected  to  be  closely  correlated  with  changes  in
short-term  LIBOR, although  we  may  choose  to  extend  the  maturity 
of our liabilities at any time. Our average cost of funds was equal to aver-
age one-month LIBOR for the year ended December 31, 2000, 0.08%
below  average  one-month  LIBOR  for  the  year  ended  December  31,
1999  and  equal  to  average  one-month  LIBOR  for  the  year  ended
December  31, 1998. We  generally  have  structured  our  borrowings  to

adjust  with  one-month  LIBOR  because  we  believe  that  one-month
LIBOR  may  continue  to  be  lower  than  six-month  LIBOR  in  the 
present interest rate environment. During the year ended December 31,
2000, average one-month LIBOR, which was 6.41%, was 0.25% lower
than  average  six-month  LIBOR, which  was  6.66%. During  the  year
ended  December  31, 1999, average  one-month  LIBOR, which  was
5.25%, was  0.28%  lower  than  average  six-month  LIBOR, which  was
5.53%. During the year ended December 31, 1998, average one-month
LIBOR, which was 5.57%, was 0.03% higher than average six-month
LIBOR, which  was  5.54%. The  table  below  shows  our  average 
borrowed  funds  and  average  cost  of  funds  as  compared  to  average 
one-month  and  average  six-month  LIBOR  for  the  years  ended
December  31, 2000, 1999  and  1998, the  period  ended  December  31,
1997 and the four quarters in 2000.

Average Cost of Funds

(dollars in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
For the Period Ended December 31, 1997

For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2000
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2000

Average
Borrowed
Funds

$1,449,999
$1,350,230
$1,360,040
$ 404,140

$1,632,564
$1,477,112
$1,360,419
$1,329,900

Interest
Expense 

$92,902
$ 69,846
$ 75,735
$ 19,677

$27,377
$24,779
$21,453
$19,293

Average
Cost 
of Funds 

6.41 %
5.17 %
5.57 %
5.61 %

6.71 %
6.71 %
6.30 %
5.80 %

Average
One-
Month
LIBOR 

6.41%
5.25 %
5.57 %
5.67 %

6.65%
6.62%
6.46%
5.92%

Average 
One-Month
LIBOR
Relative to
Average 
Six-Month
LIBOR

Average Cost 
of Funds
Relative 
to Average 
One-Month
LIBOR

Average Cost
of Funds
Relative 
to Average 
Six-Month
LIBOR

(0.25 %)
(0.28 %)
0.03 %
(0.20 %)

0.03 %
(0.22 %)
(0.38 %)
(0.40 %)

—
(0.08%)
—
(0.06%)

0.06%
0.09%
(0.16%)
(0.12%)

(0.25%)
(0.36%)
0.03%
(0.26%)

0.09%
(0.13%)
(0.54%)
(0.52%)

Average
Six-
Month
LIBOR

6.66%
5.53%
5.54%
5.87%

6.62%
6.84%
6.84%
6.32%

Net Interest Rate Agreement Expense
We have not entered into any interest rate agreements to date. As part 
of our asset/liability management process, we may enter into interest rate
agreements such as interest rate caps, floors or swaps. These agreements
would  be  entered  into  with  the  intent  to  reduce  interest  rate 
or  prepayment  risk  and  would  be  designed  to  provide  us  income  and
capital  appreciation  in  the  event  of  certain  changes  in  interest  rates.
However, even after entering into these agreements, we would still be
exposed to interest rate and prepayment risks. We review the need for
interest  rate  agreements  on  a  regular  basis  consistent  with  our  capital
investment policy.

Net Interest Income
Our  net  interest  income, which  equals  interest  income  less  interest
expense, totaled $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000,
$20.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, and $14.3 million
for  the  year  ended  December  31, 1998. Our  net  interest  income
decreased  for  the  year  ended  December  31, 2000  because  of  higher
funding costs for the year. The substantial increase in interest expense 
for the year ended December 31, 2000 was only partially offset by the
increase in interest income. Our net interest income increased because
of  lower  funding  costs  for  the  year  for  the  year  ended  December  31,

1999, when compared to the year ended December 31, 1998. Our net
interest spread, which equals the yield on our average assets for the peri-
od less the average cost of funds for the period, was 0.61% for the year
ended  December  31, 2000  as  compared  to  0.98%  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 1999. This 0.37% decrease in spread income is reflected
in  the  $3.2  million  decrease  in  net  interest  income. Our  net  interest
spread was 0.98% for the year ended December 31, 1999 as compared
to 0.59% for the year ended December 31, 1998. This 0.39% increase
in spread income is reflected in the $5.7 million increase in net interest
income. Net interest margin, which equals net interest income divided
by  average  interest  earning  assets, was  1.02%  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2000, 1.35% for the year ended December 31, 1999, and
0.95% for the year ended December 31, 1998.The principal reason that
net interest margin exceeded net interest spread is that average interest
earning assets exceeded average interest bearing liabilities. A portion of
our assets is funded with equity rather than borrowings.We did not have
any interest rate agreement expenses to date.

The  table  below  shows  our  interest  income  by  earning  asset  type,
average  earning  assets  by  type, total  interest  income, interest  expense,
average  repurchase  agreements, average  cost  of  funds, and  net  interest
income  for  the  years  ended  December  31, 2000, 1999  and  1998, the
period ended December 31, 1997, and the four quarters in 2000.

| ten |

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

GAAP Net Interest Income

Average
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
Held

Interest
Income on
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities

Average
Cash
Equivalents

Total
Interest
Income

Yield on
Average
Interest
Earning
Assets

Average
Balance of
Repurchase
Agreements

Interest
Expense

Average
Cost 
of Funds

Net 
Interest 
Income

(dollars in thousands)

For the Year Ended

December 31, 2000

$1,564,228

$109,739

$263

$109,750

7.02%

$1,449,999

$ 92,902

6.41%

$16,848

For the Year Ended

December 31, 1999

$ 1,461,033

$ 89,801

$221

$ 89,812

6.15 %

$ 1,350,230

$ 69,846

5.17 %

$ 19,966

For the Year Ended

December 31, 1998
For the Period Ended 
December 31, 1997

For the Quarter Ended 
December 31, 2000
For the Quarter Ended 
September 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended

$ 1,461,789

$ 89,986

$ 2

$ 89,986

6.16 %

$ 1,360,040

$ 75,735

5.57 %

$ 14,251

$

448,276

$ 24,682

$ 31

$ 24,713

6.34 %

$ 404,140

$ 19,677

5.61 %

$ 5,036

$1,741,985

$ 31,154

$394

$ 31,160

7.16%

$1,632,564

$ 27,377

6.71%

$ 3,783

$1,590,497

$ 28,237

$188

$ 28,239

7.10%

$1,447,112

$ 24,779

6.71%

$ 3,460

June 30, 2000

$1,476,283

$ 25,732

$243

$ 25,734

6.97%

$1,360,419

$ 21,453

6.30%

$ 4,282

For the Quarter Ended 
March 31, 2000

$1,448,148

$ 24,616

$226

$ 24,617

6.80%

$1,329,900

$ 19,293

5.80%

$ 5,323

Gains and Losses on Sales of Mortgage-Backed Securities
For the year ended December 31, 2000, we sold mortgage-backed secu-
rities with an aggregate historical amortized cost of $487.8 million for
an  aggregate  gain  of  $2.0  million. For  the  year  ended  December  31,
1999, we  sold  mortgage-backed  securities  with  an  aggregate  historical
amortized cost of $122.1 million for an aggregate gain of $455,000. For
the year ended December 31, 1998, we sold mortgage-backed securities
with  an  aggregate  historical  amortized  cost  of  $565.2  million  for  an
aggregate gain of $3.3 million. As stated above, our gain on the sale of
assets increased substantially for the year ended December 31, 2000. For
the  year  ended  December  31, 1999, there  was  a  greater  emphasis  on
spread income and not gains.The difference between the sale price and
the historical amortized cost of our mortgage-backed securities is a real-
ized  gain  and  increases  income  accordingly. We  do  not  expect  to  sell
assets on a frequent basis, but may from time to time sell existing assets
to  move  into  new  assets, which  our  management  believes  might  have
higher risk-adjusted returns, or to manage our balance sheet as part of
our asset/liability management strategy.

GAAP G&A Expenses and Operating Expense Ratios

Credit Losses
We  have  not  experienced  credit  losses  on  our  mortgage-backed 
securities to date. We have limited our exposure to credit losses on our
mortgage-backed  securities  by  purchasing  only  securities, issued  or 
guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA, which, although not rated,
carry an implied “AAA” rating.

General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses (“G&A”) were $2.3 million for the
years  ended  December  31, 2000  and  1999. G&A  expenses  were  $2.1
million for the year ended December 31, 1998. G&A expenses as a per-
centage  of  average  assets  was  0.14%, 0.15%, and  0.14%  for  the  years
ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998 respectively. G&A expenses
in total were materially unchanged for the three year period. The table
below shows our total G&A expenses as compared to average assets and
average equity for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
the period ended December 31, 1997, and the four quarters in 2000.

(dollars in thousands)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
For the Period Ended December 31, 1997

For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2000
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2000

| eleven |

Total G&A
Expenses/ 
Average 
Assets
(annualized)

Total G&A
Expenses/

Average  
Equity
(annualized)

0.14%
0.15%
0.14%
0.21%

0.14%
0.13%
0.15%
0.16%

1.94%
1.94%
1.60%
1.61%

2.11%
1.84%
1.85%
2.19%

Total
G&A
Expenses

$2,286
$2,281
$2,106
$ 852

$ 670
$ 527
$ 507
$ 582

Net Income and Return on Average Equity
Our net income was $16.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2000, $18.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, and $15.5
million for the year ended December 31, 1998. Our return on average
equity was 14.1% for the year ended December 31, 2000, 15.4% for
the  year  ended  December  31, 1999, and  11.8%  for  the  year  ended
December  31, 1998. The  decrease  in  net  income  for  the  year  ended
December 2000, as compared to the year ended December 31, 1999,
is  a  direct  result  of  a  decrease  in  spread  income. As  previously  men-
tioned, the substantial increase in interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2000 was the primary reason that our earnings decrease.
The  Company  was  able  to  take  advantage  of  appreciation  in  asset

value. The gain on sale of securities increased by $1.6 million for the
year  ended  December  31, 2000, as  compared  to  the  prior  year. The
increase in net income for the year ended December 31, 1999, as com-
pared  to  the  year  ended  December  31, 1998, is  a  direct  result  of  an
increase in spread income. The substantial decline in interest expense
for the year ended December 31, 1999 was the primary reason that our
earnings  increased. The  G&A  expenses  remained  relatively  constant
during the three year period. The table below shows our net interest
income, gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities and G&A expens-
es  each  as  a  percentage  of  average  equity, and  the  return  on  average
equity for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, and 1997,
and for the four quarters in 2000.

Components of Return on Average Equity

(Ratios for the Quarters Ended December 31, 2000,
September 30, 2000, June 30, 2000, March 31, 2000 and 
the Period ended December 31, 1997 are annualized)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
For the Period Ended December 31, 1997

For the Quarter Ended December 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2000

Net Interest
Income/
Average Equity 

Gain on Sale of
Mortgage-Backed
Securities/
Average Equity

G&A Expenses/
Average Equity

Return on 
Average Equity

14.31 %
16.97 %
10.85 %
9.49 %

11.90 %
12.08 %
15.61 %
20.07 %

1.72%
0.38 %
2.55 %
1.39 %

3.09%
3.05%
0.24%
0.40%

1.94%
1.94 %
1.60 %
1.61 %

2.11%
1.84%
1.85%
2.19%

14.09 %
15.41 %
11.80 %
9.27 %

12.88 %
13.29 %
14.00 %
18.28 %

Dividends and Taxable Income
We  have  elected  to  be  taxed  as  a  REIT  under  the  Internal  Revenue
Code. Accordingly, we  have  distributed  substantially  all  of  our  taxable
income  for  each  year  since  inception  to  our  stockholders, including
income resulting from gains on sales of our mortgage-backed securities.
From  inception  through  December  31, 2000, approximate  taxable 

income exceeded dividend declarations by $810,000, or $.05 per share,
based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding at period
end. The  table  below  shows  taxable  income  as  compared  to 
dividends paid for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
the period ended December 31, 1997, and the four quarters in 2000.

Dividend Summary

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
For the Period Ended December 31, 1997

For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2000
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2000
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2000

Taxable 
Net Income

Weighted 
Average 
Common Shares
Outstanding

Taxable 
Net Income 
Per Share

Dividends
Declared 
Per Share

$15,700
$ 18,437
$ 16,477
$ 4,884

$ 4,178
$ 3,373
$ 3,594
$ 4,555

14,089,436
12,889,510
12,709,116
5,952,123

14,413,578
14,238,680
14,039,741
13,660,539

$ 1.11
$ 1.43
$ 1.30
$ 0.82

$ 0.29
$ 0.24
$ 0.25
$ 0.33

$ 1.15
$ 1.39
$ 1.21
$ 0.79

$ 0.25
$ 0.25
$ 0.30
$ 0.35

Total 
Dividends

$16,333
$17,978
$15,437
$ 4,690

$ 3,631
$ 3,575
$ 4,262
$ 4,864

Dividend 
Pay-out 
Ratio

104.0 %
97.5 %
93.7 %
96.0 %

86.9 %
105.9 %
119.5 %
107.4 %

Cumulative
Undistributed
Taxable 
Income

$ 810
$1,697
$1,234
$ 194

$ 810
$ 726
$ 1159
$1,404

|twelve|

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

Financial Condition

Mortgage-Backed Securities
All of our mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2000, 1999, and
1998  were  adjustable-rate  or  fixed-rate  mortgage-backed  securities
backed  by  single-family  mortgage  loans. All  of  the  mortgage  assets
underlying  these  mortgage-backed  securities  were  secured  with  a  first
lien position on the underlying single-family properties. All our mort-
gage-backed  securities  were  FHLMC, FNMA  or  GNMA  mortgage
pass-through certificates or CMOs, which carry an implied “AAA” rat-
ing.We mark-to-market all of our earning assets at liquidation value.

We accrete discount balances as an increase in interest income over
the life of discount mortgage-backed securities and we amortize premi-
um balances as a decrease in interest income over the life of premium
mortgage-backed securities. At December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998 we
had on our balance sheet a total of $989,000, $1.1 million and $609,000,
respectively, of unamortized discount (which is the difference between
the  remaining  principal  value  and  current  historical  amortized  cost  of
our  mortgage-backed  securities  acquired  at  a  price  below  principal
value)  and  a  total  of  $24.3  million, $23.6  million  and  $24.9  million,

Mortgage-Backed Securities

respectively, of unamortized premium (which is the difference between
the  remaining  principal  value  and  the  current  historical  amortized 
cost  of  our  mortgage-backed  securities  acquired  at  a  price  above 
principal value).

We  received  mortgage  principal  repayments  of  $168.5  million  for 
the year ended December 31, 2000, $362.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 1999, and $486.3 million for the year ended December
31, 1998. Given our current portfolio composition, if mortgage princi-
pal  prepayment  rates  were  to  increase  over  the  life  of  our  mortgage-
backed securities, all other factors being equal, our net interest income
would decrease during the life of these mortgage-backed securities as we
would be required to amortize our net premium balance into income
over a shorter time period. Similarly, if mortgage principal prepayment
rates were to decrease over the life of our mortgage-backed securities, all
other factors being equal, our net interest income would increase during
the life of these mortgage-backed securities as we would amortize our
net premium balance over a longer time period.

The  table  below  summarizes  our  mortgage-backed  securities  at
December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997, September 30, 2000, June 30,
2000, and March 31, 2000.

(dollars in thousands)

Principal Value 

At December 31, 2000
At December 31, 1999
At December 31, 1998
At December 31, 1997

At September 30, 2000
At June 30, 2000
At March 31, 2000

$1,967,967
$ 1,452,917
$ 1,502,414
$ 1,138,365

$1,669,997
$1,464,968
$1,448,875

Net
Premium

$23,296
$ 22,444
$ 24,278
$ 21,390

$21,878
$20,893
$21,826

Amortized
Cost 

Amortized
Cost/Principal
Value 

Estimated Fair
Value

Estimated 
Fair Value/
Principal Value 

Weighted
Average
Yield

$1,991,263
$ 1,475,361
$ 1,526,692
$ 1,159,755

$1,691,875
$1,485,861
$1,470,701

101.18 %
101.54 %
101.62 %
101.88 %

101.31 %
101.43 %
101.51 %

$1,978,219
$ 1,437,793
$ 1,520,289
$ 1,161,779

$1,664,136
$1,450,853
$1,436,389

100.52 %
98.96 %
101.19 %
102.06 %

99.65 %
99.04 %
99.14 %

7.09 %
6.77 %
6.43 %
6.57 %

7.23 %
7.32 %
7.02 %

The tables below set forth certain characteristics of our mortgage-backed
securities.The index level for adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities

is  the  weighted  average  rate  of  the  various  short-term  interest  rate
indices, which determine the coupon rate.

Adjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed Security Characteristics

(dollars in thousands)

At December 31, 2000
At December 31, 1999
At December 31, 1998
At December 31, 1997

Principal
Value 

$1,454,356
$ 951,839
$ 1,030,654
$ 994,653

At September 30, 2000
At June 30, 2000
At March 31, 2000

$1,203,268
$ 986,046
$ 957,419

Weighted
Average 
Coupon
Rate 

7.61%
7.33%
6.84%
7.13%

7.64%
7.53%
7.18%

Weighted
Average 
Index Level 

Weighted
Average Net
Margin 

5.76%
5.84 %
5.18 %
5.52 %

5.93%
6.02%
5.63%

1.85%
1.49%
1.66%
1.61%

1.71%
1.51%
1.55%

Weighted
Average Term
to Next 
Adjustment

15 months
11 months
12 months
22 months

13 months
9 months
10 months

Weighted
Average
Lifetime Cap

11.47 %
10.30 %
10.63 %
10.78 %

11.01 %
10.41 %
10.59 %

| thirteen |

Weighted

Principal Value
at Period End 
as % of Total
Average  Mortgage-Backed
Securities

Asset Yield 

7.24%
7.64 %
6.42 %
6.50 %

7.36%
7.46%
7.06%

73.90%
65.51 %
68.60 %
87.38 %

72.05%
67.31%
66.08%

Fixed-Rate Mortgage-Backed Security Characteristics

(dollars in thousands)

At December 31, 2000
At December 31, 1999
At December 31, 1998
At December 31, 1997

At September 30, 2000
At June 30, 2000
At March 31, 2000

Principal Value

Weighted
Average 
Coupon Rate

Weighted

Principal Value
as % of Total
Average Mortgage-Backed
Securities

Asset Yield

$513,611
$ 501,078
$ 471,760
$ 143,712

$466,729
$478,922
$491,456

6.62%
6.58 %
6.55 %
7.50 %

6.58%
6.58%
6.58%

6.68%
7.01 %
6.47 %
7.08 %

6.92%
7.05%
7.04%

26.10%
34.49 %
31.40 %
12.62 %

27.95%
32.69%
33.92%

At December 31, 2000, 1999, and 2000 we held mortgage-backed securities with coupons linked to the one-year, three-year, and
five-year Treasury indices, one-month LIBOR and the six-month CD rate.

Adjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities by Index

December 31, 2000

Weighted Average Adjustment Frequency
Weighted Average Term to Next Adjustment
Weighted Average Annual Period Cap
Weighted Average Lifetime Cap at December 31, 2000
Mortgage Principal Value as Percentage of

Mortgage-Backed Securities at December 31, 2000

Adjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities by Index

December 31, 1999

Weighted Average Adjustment Frequency
Weighted Average Term to Next Adjustment
Weighted Average Annual Period Cap
Weighted Average Lifetime Cap at December 31, 1999
Mortgage Principal Value as Percentage of 

Mortgage-Backed Securities at December 31, 1999

Adjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities by Index

December 31, 1998

Weighted Average Adjustment Frequency
Weighted Average Term to Next Adjustment
Weighted Average Annual Period Cap
Weighted Average Lifetime Cap at December 31, 1998
Mortgage Principal Value as Percentage of

Mortgage-Backed Securities at December 31, 1998

One-Month 
LIBOR

Six-Month
CD Rate

1 mo.
1 mo.
None
9.11%

6 mo.
2 mo.
1.00 %
11.37 %

1-Year
Treasury
Index

12 mo.
23 mo.
1.98%
12.61%

3-Year
Treasury
Index

36 mo.
20 mo.
2.00%
13.24%

5-Year
Treasury
Index

60 mo.
40 mo.
1.76 %
12.42 %

24.08%

1.21 %

44.52%

2.97%

1.12 %

One-Month 
LIBOR

Six-Month
CD Rate

1 mo.
1 mo.
None
9.20%

6 mo.
2 mo.
1.00%
11.36%

1-Year
Treasury
Index

12 mo.
25 mo.
1.93%
11.19%

3-Year
Treasury
Index

36 mo.
16 mo.
1.57%
13.23%

5-Year
Treasury
Index

60 mo.
36 mo.
1.35%
11.68%

34.89%

2.12%

22.62%

5.22%

0.66%

One-Month 
LIBOR

Six-Month
CD Rate

1 mo.
1 mo.
None
9.16%

6 mo.
3 mo.
1.00%
11.04%

1-Year
Treasury
Index

12 mo.
23 mo.
1.83%
11.76%

3-Year
Treasury
Index

36 mo.
9 mo.
2.00%
13.07%

5-Year
Treasury
Index

60 mo.
2 mo.
2.00%
11.57%

29.60%

3.73%

33.33%

1.62%

0.32%

| fourteen |

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

Interest Rate Agreements
Interest rate agreements are assets that are carried on a balance sheet at
estimated liquidation value. We have not entered into any interest rate
agreements since our inception.

Borrowings
To date, our debt has consisted entirely of borrowings collateralized by a
pledge of our mortgage-backed securities. These borrowings appear on
our balance sheet as repurchase agreements. At December 31, 2000, we
had  established  uncommitted  borrowing  facilities  in  this  market  with
twenty-three lenders in amounts, which we believe, are in excess of our
needs. All  of  our  mortgage-backed  securities  are  currently  accepted  as
collateral for these borrowings. However, we limit our borrowings, and
thus our potential asset growth, in order to maintain unused borrowing
capacity and thus increase the liquidity and strength of our balance sheet.
For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, the term to
maturity  of  our  borrowings  ranged  from  one  day  six  months, with  a
weighted average original term to maturity of 56 days at December 31,
2000, 50 days at December 31, 1999, and 49 days at December 31, 1998.
At December 31, 2000, the weighted average cost of funds for all of our
borrowings  was  6.55%  and  the  weighted  average  term  to  next  rate
adjustment  was  29  days. At  December  31, 1999, the  weighted  average
cost of funds for all of our borrowings was 5.26% and the weighted aver-
age term to next rate adjustment was 20 days. At December 31, 1998,
the weighted average cost of funds for all of our borrowings was 5.21%
and the weighted average term to next rate adjustment was 29 days.

Liquidity
Liquidity, which is our ability to turn non-cash assets into cash, allows us
to purchase additional mortgage-backed securities and to pledge addi-
tional  assets  to  secure  existing  borrowings  should  the  value  of  our
pledged  assets  decline. Potential  immediate  sources  of  liquidity  for  us
include cash balances and unused borrowing capacity. Unused borrow-
ing capacity will vary over time as the market value of our mortgage-
backed securities varies. Our balance sheet also generates liquidity on an
on-going basis through mortgage principal repayments and net earnings
held prior to payment as dividends. Should our needs ever exceed these
on-going sources of liquidity plus the immediate sources of liquidity dis-
cussed above, we believe that our mortgage-backed securities could in
most circumstances be sold to raise cash.The maintenance of liquidity is
one of the goals of our capital investment policy. Under this policy, we

limit  asset  growth  in  order  to  preserve  unused  borrowing  capacity  for 
liquidity management purposes.

Stockholders’ Equity
We use “available-for-sale” treatment for our mortgage-backed securi-
ties; we carry these assets on our balance sheet at estimated market value
rather than historical amortized cost. Based upon this “available-for-sale”
treatment, our equity base at December 31, 2000 was $135.6 million, or
$9.34 per share. If we had used historical amortized cost accounting, our
equity base at December 31, 2000 would have been $148.6 million, or
$10.24 per share. Our equity base at December 31, 1999 was $103.3 mil-
lion, or  $7.60  per  share. If  we  had  used  historical  amortized  cost
accounting, our  equity  base  at  December  31, 1998  would  have  been
$140.8 million, or $10.37 per share. Our equity base at December 31,
1998 was $125.9 million, or $9.95 per share. If we had used historical
amortized cost accounting, our equity base at December 31, 1998 would
have been $132.3 million, or $10.46 per share. During the years ended
December 31, 2000 and 1999, the Company raised additional capital in
the amount of $7.4 million and $8.2 million through its direct purchase
program. The Company completed a secondary offering of 9.8 million
shares  of  common  stock  on  January  29, 2001. The  aggregate  net  pro-
ceeds to the Company (after deducting estimated expenses) are estimat-
ed to be $87.4 million.The underwriters exercised an option to purchase
1.4 million additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments
on  February  22, 2001, providing  the  company  with  net  proceeds  of
$12.1 million.

With our “available-for-sale” accounting treatment, unrealized fluc-
tuations in market values of assets do not impact our GAAP or taxable
income  but  rather  are  reflected  on  our  balance  sheet  by  changing  the
carrying value of the asset and stockholders’ equity under “Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).” By accounting for our assets in
this manner, we hope to provide useful information to stockholders and
creditors  and  to  preserve  flexibility  to  sell  assets  in  the  future  without
having to change accounting methods.

As a result of this mark-to-market accounting treatment, our book
value and book value per share are likely to fluctuate far more than if we
used historical amortized cost accounting. As a result, comparisons with
companies  that  use  historical  cost  accounting  for  some  or  all  of  their 
balance sheet may not be meaningful.

The table below shows unrealized gains and losses on the mortgage-

backed securities in our portfolio.

Unrealized Gains and Losses

(dollars in thousands)

Unrealized Gain 
Unrealized Loss
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)

Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) as % of Mortgage-Backed Securities Principal Value
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) as % of Mortgage-Backed Securities Amortized Cost

At December 31,

2000

1999

1998

$ 3,020
(16,064)
$(13,044)

(0.66%)
(0.66%)

$ 1,531
(39,100)
$(37,569)

(2.59%)
(2.54%)

$ 3,302
(9,706)
$ (6,404)

(0.43%)
(0.42%)

1997

$ 3,253
(1,229)
$ 2,024

0.18%
0.17%

Unrealized  changes  in  the  estimated  net  market  value  of  mortgage-
backed  securities  have  one  direct  effect  on  our  potential  earnings  and
dividends: positive  market-to-market  changes  increase  our  equity  base
and allow us to increase our borrowing capacity while negative changes
tend to limit borrowing capacity under our capital investment policy. A
very  large  negative  change  in  the  net  market  value  of  our  mortgage-
backed securities might impair our liquidity position, requiring us to sell
assets  with  the  likely  result  of  realized  losses  upon  sale. “Unrealized

Losses on Available for Sale Securities” was $13.0 million, or 0.66% of
the amortized cost of our mortgage-backed securities at December 31,
2000.“Unrealized Losses on Available for Sale Securities” was $37.6 mil-
lion or 2.54% of the amortized cost of our mortgage-backed securities
at  December  31, 1999. “Unrealized  Losses  on  Available  for  Sale
Securities” was  $6.4  million  or  0.42%  of  the  amortized  cost  of  our
mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 1998.

| fifteen |

The table below shows our equity capital base as reported and on a
historical amortized cost basis at December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, and
1997, and  September  30, 2000, June  30, 2000  and  March  31, 2000.
Issuances of common stock, the level of GAAP earnings as compared to

dividends declared, and other factors influence our historical cost equi-
ty capital base.The GAAP reported equity capital base is influenced by
these  factors  plus  changes  in  the  “Net  Unrealized  Losses  on  Assets
Available for Sale” account.

Stockholders’ Equity

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

At December 31, 2000
At December 31, 1999
At December 31, 1998
At December 31, 1997

At September 30, 2000
At June 30, 2000
At March 31, 2000

Historical
Amortized Cost
Equity Base

Net Unrealized
Gains on Assets
Available for Sale

GAAP
Reported
Equity Base
(Book Value)

Historical
GAAP
Amortized Reported Equity
(BookValue)
Cost Equity
Per Share
Per Share

$148,686
$ 140,841
$ 132,275
$ 133,062

$146,446
$145,448
$143,279

$ (13,044)
$ (37,569)
$ (6,404)
2,024
$

$ (27,739)
$ (35,008)
$ (34,313)

$135,642
$103,272
$125,871
$135,086

$118,707
$110,440
$108,966

$10.24
$10.37
$10.46
$10.47

$10.24
$10.24
$10.31

$ 9.34
$ 7.60
$ 9.95
$10.62

$ 8.30
$ 7.77
$ 7.84

Leverage
Our debt-to-GAAP reported equity ratio at December 31, 2000, 1999,
and 1998 was 12.0:1, 12.9:1, and 10.1:1 respectively.We generally expect
to maintain a ratio of debt-to-equity of between 8:1 and 12:1, although
the  ratio  may  vary  from  this  range  from  time  to  time  based  upon 
various factors, including our management’s opinion of the level of risk
of  our  assets  and  liabilities, our  liquidity  position, our  level  of  unused
borrowing capacity and over-collateralization levels required by lenders
when we pledge assets to secure borrowings.

Inflation
Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are financial in nature.As a result,
interest rates and other factors drive our performance far more than does
inflation. Changes  in  interest  rates  do  not  necessarily  correlate  with
inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Our financial statements are
prepared  in  accordance  with  GAAP  and  our  dividends  based  upon 
our net income as calculated for tax purposes; in each case, our activities
and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost or fair
market value without considering inflation.

Our target debt-to-GAAP reported equity ratio is determined under
our  capital  investment  policy. Should  our  actual  debt-to-equity  ratio
increase above the target level due to asset acquisition or market value
fluctuations in assets, we will cease to acquire new assets. Our manage-
ment will, at that time, present a plan to our Board of Directors to bring
us back to our target debt-to-equity ratio; in many circumstances, this
would be accomplished in time by the monthly reduction of the balance
of our mortgage-backed securities through principal repayments.

Asset/Liability Management and 
Effect of Changes in Interest Rates
We  continually  review  our  asset/liability  management  strategy  with
respect to interest rate risk, mortgage prepayment risk, credit risk and the
related issues of capital adequacy and liquidity. We seek attractive risk-
adjusted stockholder returns while maintaining a strong balance sheet.

We seek to manage the extent to which our net income changes as
a function of changes in interest rates by matching adjustable-rate assets
with variable-rate borrowings. In addition, although we have not done
so to date, we may seek to mitigate the potential impact on net income
of periodic and lifetime coupon adjustment restrictions in our portfolio
of mortgage-backed securities by entering into interest rate agreements
such as interest rate caps and interest rate swaps.

Changes in interest rates may also have an effect on the rate of mort-
gage principal prepayments and, as a result, prepayments on mortgage-
backed securities. We will seek to mitigate the effect of changes in the
mortgage principal repayment rate by balancing assets we purchase at a
premium with assets we purchase at a discount. To date, the aggregate
premium  exceeds  the  aggregate  discount  on  our  mortgage-backed 
securities. As  a  result, prepayments, which  result  in  the  expensing  of
unamortized premium, will reduce our net income compared to what
net income would be absent such prepayments.

Other Matters
We calculate that our qualified REIT assets, as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code, are 99.9% of our total assets at December 31, 2000 and
1999  and  99.5%  at  December  31, 1998, as  compared  to  the  Internal
Revenue  Code  requirement  that  at  least  75%  of  our  total  assets  be 
qualified REIT assets.We also calculate that 98.1%, 99.5% and 96.4% of
our revenue qualifies for the 75% source of income test, and 100% of its
revenue  qualifies  for  the  95%  source  of  income  test, under  the  REIT
rules for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, respec-
tively. We also met all REIT requirements regarding the ownership of
our common stock and the distribution of our net income.Therefore, as
of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 we believe that we qualified as a
REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.

We at all times intend to conduct our business so as not to become
regulated  as  an  investment  company  under  the  Investment  Company
Act. If we were to become regulated as an investment company, then our
use  of  leverage  would  be  substantially  reduced. The  Investment
Company  Act  exempts  entities  that  are  “primarily  engaged  in  the 
business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens
on  and  interests  in  real  estate” (qualifying  interests). Under  current 
interpretation of the staff of the SEC, in order to qualify for this exemp-
tion, we must maintain at least 55% of our assets directly in qualifying
interests. In addition, unless certain mortgage securitites represent all the
certificates issued with respect to an underlying pool of mortgages, the
mortgage-backed  securities  may  be  treated  as  securities  separate  from
the  underlying  mortgage  loans  and, thus, may  not  be  considered 
qualifying interests for purposes of the 55% requirement. We calculate
that as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 we were in compliance
with this requirement.

| sixteen |

Statements of Financial Condition

December 31,

Assets

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Mortgage-Backed Securities—At fair value
Receivable for Mortgage-Backed Securities Sold
Accrued Interest Receivable
Other Assets

Total Assets

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Repurchase agreements
Payable for Mortgage-Backed Securities purchased
Accrued interest payable
Dividends payable
Accounts payable

Total liabilities

Stockholders’ Equity:

Common stock: par value $.01 per share;

100,000,000 authorized, 14,522,978 and 13,581,316
shares issued and outstanding, respectively

Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Retained earnings

Total stockholders’ equity

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

See notes to financial statements.

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

2000

1999

$

113,061
1,978,219,376
44,933,631
11,502,482
260,238

$2,035,028,788  

$ 1,628,359,000
258,798,138
8,314,414
3,630,745  
284,105

1,899,386,402

$
71,918
1,437,792,631
46,402,360
6,857,683
197,896

$1,491,322,488

$1,338,295,750
38,154,012
6,682,687
4,753,461
164,100

1,388,050,010

145,230  

147,844,861
(13,044,259)
696,554

135,642,386  

135,813
140,262,657
(37,568,510)

442,518  

103,272,478  

$ 2,035,028,788

$1,491,322,488

| seventeen |

Statements of Operations

Years Ended December 31,

Interest Income:

Mortgage-Backed Securities
Other interest income

Total interest income

Interest Expense:

Repurchase agreements

Net Interest Income

Gain on sale of Mortgage-Backed Securities

General and Administrative Expenses

Net Income

Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss):

Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

Other comprehensive gain (loss)

Comprehensive Income

Net Income Per Share:

Basic
Diluted

Average Number of Shares Outstanding:

Basic
Diluted

See notes to financial statements.

2000

1999

$109,739,302
11,104
109,750,406

$ 89,801,353  
10,641  

89,811,994

92,901,697

16,848,709

2,025,205

2,286,626

69,846,206

19,965,788

454,782  

2,281,290  

16,587,288

18,139,280  

26,549,456
(2,025,205)
24,524,251

(30,709,453) 
(454,782) 
(31,164,235) 

$ 41,111,539

$(13,024,955) 

$
$

1.18
1.15

$
$

1.41  
1.35  

14,089,436
14,377,459

12,889,510  
13,454,007  

| eighteen |

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

Balance, December 31, 1998

$ 126,484  

$ 131,868,108  

— $

280,992

$

(6,404,275) 

$125,871,309 

Common
Stock
Par Value

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Comprehensive
Income

Retained
Earnings

Other
Comprehensive
Income

Total

Net income
Other comprehensive income:

Unrealized net losses on securities,
net of reclassification adjustment

Comprehensive income

Exercise of stock options
Proceeds from direct purchase
Dividends declared for the year ended

December 31, 1999, $1.39 per average share

—

—

—

572
8,757

—

232,704  
8,161,845  

—

—

$ 18,139,280  

18,139,280

—

—

—

(31,164,235) 

$(13,024,955) 

(31,164,235) 

—

—

—
—

(17,977,754) 

—
—

—

—

—

—
—

—

(13,024,955) 

233,276  
8,170,602  

(17,977,754) 

Balance, December 31, 1999

135,813  

140,262,657  

442,518  

(37,568,510) 

103,272,478

—      

—

$ 16,587,288  

16,587,288  

—

Net income
Other comprehensive income:

Unrealized net gains on securities,
net of reclassification adjustment

Comprehensive income

Exercise of stock options
Proceeds from direct purchase
Dividends declared for the year ended

December 31, 2000, $1.15 per average share

—

—

475
8,942

—

—

24,524,251  

$ 41,111,539  

198,287  
7,383,917  

—   
—

—

—

—
—

24,524,251  

—

—
—

41,111,539 

198,762
7,392,859

—

(16,333,252) 

— (16,333,252) 

—

—

—

—

Balance, December 31, 2000

$ 145,230   $ 147,844,861  

— $

696,554

$ (13,044,259) 

$135,642,386  

See notes to financial statements.

| nineteen |

Statement of Cash Flows

Years ended December 31,

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

2000

1999

$

16,587,288

$

18,139,280  

Amortization of mortgage premiums and discounts, net
Gain on sale of Mortgage-Backed Securities
Increase in accrued interest receivable
Decrease (increase) in other assets
Increase in accrued interest payable
Increase in accounts payable

Net cash provided by operating activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Purchase of Mortgage-Backed Securities
Proceeds from sale of Mortgage-Backed Securities
Principal payments on Mortgage-Backed Securities

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from repurchase agreements
Principal payments on repurchase agreements
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Proceeds from direct equity offering
Dividends paid

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equvalents

Cash and Cash Equvalents, Beginning of Year

Cash and Cash Equvalents, End of Year

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

Interest paid

Noncash Financing Activities:

Net change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities

Dividends declared, not yet paid

See notes to financial statements 

2,646,753
(2,025,205) 
(4,644,799)
(62,342) 

1,631,727
120,005 
14,253,427

(952,737,643)
489,809,698
168,516,759
(294,411,186)

14,196,953,221
(13,906,889,971)
198,762
7,392,859  
(17,455,969) 
280,198,902

41,143

71,918 

113,061

91,269,970

24,524,251

3,630,745

$

$

$

$

6,103,239  
(454,782) 
(98,310) 
36,988  
1,630,061  
24,864  

25,381,340

(559,695,956) 
122,552,293  
362,657,549  
(74,486,114) 

11,202,660,000  
(11,144,874,250)
233,276  
8,170,602  
(17,081,956) 
49,107,672  

2,898  

69,020  

71,918  

68,216,145  

(31,164,235) 

4,753,461 

$

$

$

$

| twenty |

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporat-
ed in Maryland on November 25, 1996.The Company commenced its
operations  of  purchasing  and  managing  an  investment  portfolio  of
Mortgage-Backed Securities on February 18, 1997, upon receipt of the
net  proceeds  from  the  private  placement  of  equity  capital. An  initial
public offering was completed on October 14, 1997.

A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies follows:

Cash  and  Cash  Equivalents —Cash  and  cash  equivalents  includes
cash on hand and money market funds. The carrying amounts of cash
equivalents approximates their value.

Mortgage-Backed  Securities—The  Company  invests  primarily  in
mortgage  pass-through  certificates, collateralized  mortgage  obligations
and other mortgage-backed securities representing interests in or obli-
gations  backed  by  pools  of  mortgage  loans  (collectively, “Mortgage-
Backed Securities”).

Statement  of  Financial Accounting  Standards  No. 115, Accounting
for  Certain  Investments  in  Debt  and  Equity  Securities  (“SFAS  115”),
requires the Company to classify its investments as either trading invest-
ments, available-for-sale  investments  or  held-to-maturity  investments.
Although the Company generally intends to hold most of its Mortgage-
Backed Securities until maturity, it may, from time to time, sell any of its
Mortgage-Backed Securities as part of its overall management of its bal-
ance sheet. Accordingly, this flexibility requires the Company to classify
all of its Mortgage-Backed Securities as available-for-sale. All assets clas-
sified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains
and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component
of stockholders’ equity.

Unrealized losses on Mortgage-Backed Securities that are considered
other than temporary, as measured by the amount of decline in fair value
attributable to factors other than temporary, are recognized in income
and the cost basis of the Mortgage-Backed Securities is adjusted.There
were  no  such  adjustments  for  the  years  ended  December  31, 2000 
and 1999.

Interest  income  is  accrued  based  on  the  outstanding  principal
amount of the Mortgage-Backed Securities and their contractual terms.
Premiums and discounts associated with the purchase of the Mortgage-

Backed Securities are amortized into interest income over the lives of
the securities using the effective yield method.

Mortgage-Backed  Securities  transactions  are  recorded  on  the  date
the securities are purchased or sold. Purchases of newly issued securities
are recorded when all significant uncertainties regarding the characteris-
tics  of  the  securities  are  removed, generally  shortly  before  settlement
date. Realized gains and losses on Mortgage-Backed Securities transac-
tions are determined on the specific identification basis.

Credit Risk —At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the Company has lim-
ited  its  exposure  to  credit  losses  on  its  portfolio  of  Mortgage-Backed
Securities  by  only  purchasing  securities  from  Federal  Home  Loan
Mortgage  Corporation  (“FHLMC”), Federal  National  Mortgage
Association (“FNMA”), or Government National Mortgage Association
(“GNMA”).The payment of principal and interest on the FHLMC and
FNMA Mortgage-Backed Securities are guaranteed by those respective
agencies  and  the  payment  of  principal  and  interest  on  the  GNMA
Mortgage-Backed  Securities  are  backed  by  the  full-faith-and-credit  of
the  U.S. government. At  December  31, 2000  and  1999, all  of  the
Company’s Mortgage-Backed Securities have an implied “AAA” rating.

Income Taxes—The Company has elected to be taxed as a Real Estate
Investment Trust (“REIT”) and intends to comply with the provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) with
respect  thereto. Accordingly, the  Company  will  not  be  subjected  to
Federal income tax to the extent of its distributions to shareholders and
as long as certain asset, income and stock ownership tests are met.

Use  of  Estimates —The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  con-
formity with generally accepted accounting principles requires manage-
ment  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities  at  the  date  of  the  financial  statements  and  the  reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.

2. Mortgage-backed Securities
The  following  table  pertains  to  the  Company’s  Mortgage-Backed
Securities classified as available-for-sale as of December 31, 2000, which
are carried at their fair value:

Mortgage-Backed Securities, gross
Unamortized discount
Unamortized premium

Amortized cost
Gross unrealized gains
Gross unrealized losses

Estimated fair value

Federal
Home Loan
Mortgage
Corporation

Federal
National
Mortgage
Association

$1,029,045,622  
(221,944) 
11,203,043  

1,040,026,721  

2,220,525
(5,426,076)

$ 853,777,836  
(767,116) 

11,569,619

864,580,339
798,984
(9,503,333)

Government
National
Mortgage
Association

$85,143,889
—
1,512,687

86,656,576
—
(1,134,360)

Total
Mortgage
Assets

$1,967,967,347
(989,060)
24,285,349

1,991,263,636 
3,019,509
(16,063,769) 

$1,036,821,170  

$ 855,875,990

$85,522,216

$1,978,219,376  

| twenty-one |

The  following  table  pertains  to  the  Company’s  Mortgage-Backed  Securities  classified  as  available-for-sale  as  of  December  31, 1999, which  are 
carried at their fair value:

Mortgage-Backed Securities, gross

Unamortized discount
Unamortized premium

Amortized cost

Gross unrealized gains
Gross unrealized losses

Estimated fair value

Federal
Home Loan
Mortgage
Corporation

Federal
National
Mortgage
Association

Government
National
Mortgage
Association

Total
Mortgage
Assets

$454,711,462  

$ 900,782,563

$97,423,038

$1,452,917,063

(171,241)
8,454,547

(964,133)
13,359,448 

—
1,765,457

(1,135,374)
23,579,452 

462,994,768

913,177,878

99,188,495

1,475,361,141 

359,888
(12,091,145)

1,171,250
(22,966,353)

—
(4,042,150)

1,531,138  
(39,099,648) 

$451,263,511

$ 891,382,775

$95,146,345

$1,437,792,631

The adjustable rate Mortgage-Backed Securities are limited by period-
ic caps (generally interest rate adjustments are limited to no more than
1% every six months) and lifetime caps. The weighted average lifetime
cap was 11.5% and 10.6% at December 31, 2000 and 1999.

During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company realized
$2,025,205 in gains from sales of Mortgage-Backed Securities. During
the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company realized $563,259 in
gains from sales of Mortgage-Backed Securities. Losses totaled $108,477
for the year ended December 31, 1999.

3. Repurchase Agreements
The Company had outstanding $1,628,359,000 and $1,338,295,750 of
repurchase  agreements  with  a  weighted  average  borrowing  rate  of
6.55% and 5.26% and a weighted average remaining maturity of  29 days
and  20  days  as  of  December  31, 2000  and  1999, respectively. At
December  31, 2000  and  1999, Mortgage-Backed  Securities  actually
pledged  had  an  estimated  fair  value  of  $1,668,161,860  and
$1,376,684,559, respectively.

At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the repurchase agreements had the following remaining maturities:

Within 30 days
30 to 59 days
60 to 89 days
90 to 119 days
Over 120 days

2000

1999

$1,135,886,000
63,810,000
48,845,000
—
79,818,000

$1,197,416,250
25,767,000

—    

115,112,500
— 

$1,628,359,000

$1,338,295,750

4. Common Stock
During  the  year  ended  December  31, 2000, 47,499  options  were 
exercised  at  $198,762. Also, 894,163  shares  were  purchased  in  direct
offerings, totaling  $7,392,859. During  the  year  ended  December  31,
1999, 57,204 options were exercised at $233,276. Also, 875,688 shares
were purchased in direct offerings, totaling $8,170,602.

During  the  Company’s  year  ending  December  31, 2000,
the
Company  declared  dividends  to  shareholders  totaling  $16,333,252,
or  $1.15  per  weighted  average  share, of  which  $12,702,507  was  paid
during the year and $3,630,745 was paid on January 30, 2001.

During  the  Company’s  year  ending  December  31, 1999,
the
Company  declared  dividends  to  shareholders  totaling  $17,977,754,
or  $1.39  per  weighted  average  share, of  which  $13,224,293  was  paid
during the year and $4,753,461 was paid on January 27, 2000.

| twenty-two |

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

5. Earnings Per Share (EPS)
In  February  1997, the  Financial Accounting  Standards  Board  (FASB)
issued Statement of Financial Accounting No. 128, Earnings Per Share
(SFAS  No. 128), which  requires  dual  presentation  of  Basic  EPS  and
Diluted EPS on the face of the income statement for all entities with 

complex capital structures. SFAS No. 128 also requires a reconciliation
of  the  numerator  and  denominator  of  Basic  EPS  and  Diluted  EPS 
computation. For the year ended December 31, 2000, the reconciliation
is as follows:

Year Ended
December 31, 2000

Net income

Basic EPS
Effect of dilutive securities:
Dilutive stock options
Diluted EPS

Income
(Numerator)

Shares
(Denominator)

Per-Share
Amount

$ 16,587,288

16,587,288

14,089,436

$1.18

—
$ 16,587,288

288,023  

14,377,459

$1.15  

Options  to  purchase  334,881  shares  were  outstanding  during  the  year
(Note  6)  and  were  dilutive  as  the  exercise  price  (between  $4.00  and
$8.13)  was  less  than  the  average  stock  price  for  the  year  for  the
Company of $8.51. Options to purchase 568,926 shares of stock were

For the year ended December 31, 1999, the reconciliation is as follows:

outstanding  and  not  considered  dilutive. The  exercise  price  (between
$8.63 and $11.25) was greater than the average stock price for the year
of $8.51.

Year Ended
December 31, 1999

Net income

Basic EPS

Effect of dilutive securities:
Dilutive stock options

Diluted EPS

Income
(Numerator)

Shares
(Denominator)

Per-Share
Amount

$18,139,280  

18,139,280 

12,889,510

$ 1.41  

—

564,497

$18,139,280

13,454,007  

$ 1.35  

Options to purchase 708,380 shares were outstanding during the year
(Note  6)  and  were  dilutive  as  the  exercise  price  (between  $4.00  and
$8.94)  was  less  than  the  average  stock  price  for  the  year  for  the
Company of $9.58. Options to purchase 135,676 shares of stock were
outstanding  and  not  considered  dilutive. The  exercise  price  (between
$10.00 and $11.25) was greater than the average stock price for the year
of $9.58.

6. Long Term Stock Incentive Plan
The Company has adopted a Long Term Stock Incentive Plan for exec-
utive officers, key employees and nonemployee directors (the “Incentive
Plan”).The Incentive Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee of
the  Board  of  Directors  to  grant  awards, including  incentive  stock
options as defined under section 422 of the Code (“ISOs”) and options

not  so  qualified  (“NQSOs”). The  Incentive  Plan  authorizes  the 
granting of options or other awards for an aggregate of the greater of
500,000  shares  or  9.95%  of  the  outstanding  shares  of  the  Company’s
common stock.

The Company adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement
of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No. 123, “Accounting  for  Stock-
Based  Compensation.” Accordingly, no  compensation  cost  for  the
Incentive Plan has been determined based on the fair value at the grant
date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123. For the
Company’s  pro  forma  net  earnings, the  compensation  cost  will  be 
amortized  over  the  vesting  period  of  the  options. The  Company’s  net
earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts
indicated below:

December 31,

Net earnings—as reported
Net earnings—pro forma
Earnings per share—as reported
Earnings per share—pro forma

2000

1999

$16,587,288
16,468,550
1.18
$
1.17
$

$ 18,139,280  
18,010,908  
1.41  
1.40  

$
$

| twenty-three |

The  fair  value  of  each  option  grant  is  estimated  on  the  date  of  grant
using  the  Black-Scholes  option-pricing  model  with  the  following
weighted  average  assumptions  used  for  grants  in  the  year  ended
December  31, 2000: dividend  yield  of  12.69%; expected  volatility  of

28.33%; risk-free  interest  rate  of  5.16%; and  the  weighted  average
expected  lives  of  nine  years. For  the  year  ended  December  31, 1999,
dividend yield of 15%; expected volatility of 32%; risk-free interest rate
of 5.61%; and the weighted average expected lives of seven years.

Information regarding options at December 31, 2000 is as follows:

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$8.03
8.00
9.17
4.18

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

7.42
8.63
4.08
—

$8.03  

Shares

844,056  
122,500
(15,250)
(47,499)

903,807

$

0.43  

$

Shares

593,760
307,500
(57,204) 

—

844,056

$

0.63  

Outstanding, January 1, 2000

Granted (36,500 ISOs, 86,000 NQSOs)
Exercised
Expired

Outstanding, December 31, 2000

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year (per share)

Information regarding options at December 31, 1999 is as follows:

Outstanding, January 1, 1999

Granted (298,068 ISOs, 545,988 NQSOs)
Exercised
Expired

Outstanding, December 31, 1999

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year (per share)

The following table summarizes information about stock options 
outstanding at December 31, 2000:

Range of
Exercise Prices

$ 4.00  
7.94  
8.13  
8.63  
8.94  
9.06  
10.00  
10.75  
11.25  

Options
Outstanding

Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (Yrs.)

65,128  
116,250  
269,753  
300,000  
6,250  
6,250  
131,500  
6,250  
2,426  
903,807  

1  
10  
8  
9  
2  
3  
1  
2  
2  
6.9  

At December 31, 2000 and 1999, 341,013 and 162,389 options were
vested and not exercised, respectively.

7. Comprehensive Income
The  Company  adopted  FASB  Statement  No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive  Income. Statement  No. 130  requires  the  reporting  of
comprehensive  income  in  addition  to  net  income  from  operations.
Comprehensive income is a more inclusive financial reporting method-
ology  that  includes  disclosure  of  certain  financial  information  that 

historically has not been recognized in the calculation of net income.
The Company at December 31, 2000 and 1999 held securities classified
as  available-for-sale. At  December  31, 2000, the  net  unrealized  losses
totaled  $13,044,259  and  at  December  31, 1999, the  net  unrealized 
losses totaled $37,568,510.

8. Lease Commitments
The  Corporation  has  a  noncancelable  lease  for  office  space, which 
commenced in April 1998 and expires in December 2007.

| twenty-four |

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

The  Corporation’s  aggregate  future  minimum  lease  payments  are 

as follows:

2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008

Total remaining lease payments

$ 97,868
100,515
110,261
113,279
116,388
119,590
122,888

$ 780,789

Company acquired 99,960 nonvoting shares, at a cost of $49,980. The
officers and directors of Annaly International Money Management Inc.
are also officers and directors of the Company.

10. Subsequent Event
The  Company  completed  a  secondary  offerings  of  9,800,000  shares 
of  company  common  stock  on  January  29, 2001. The  aggregate  net 
proceeds  to  the  company  (after  deducting  estimated  expenses)  are 
estimated to be $87.4 million.The underwriters exercised an option to
purchase  1,350,000  additional  shares  of  common  stock  to  cover 
over-allotments on Feruary 22, 2001, providing the Company with net
proceeds of $12.1 million.

9. Related Party Transaction
Included  in “Other Assets” on  the  Balance  sheet  is  an  investment  in
Annaly International Money Management, Inc. On June 24, 1998, the

11. Summarized Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
The following is a presentation of the quarterly results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2000.

Quarters Ending

Interest income from Mortgage-
Backed Securities and cash

Interest expense on repurchase agreements

Net interest income

Gain on sale of

Mortgage-Backed Securities
General and administrative expenses

Net income

Net income per share:

Basic

Dilutive

Average number of shares outstanding:

Basic

Dilutive

March 31,
2000

June 30,
2000

September 30,
2000

December 31,
2000

$24,616,782
19,292,954

$25,734,520
21,453,016

$28,239,125
24,779,096

$31,159,979  
27,376,631

5,323,828

4,281,504

3,460,029

3,783,348  

106,853
582,319

64,774
507,322

872,949
526,881

980,629
670,104

$ 4,848,362

$ 3,838,956

$ 3,806,097

$ 4,093,873  

$

$

0.35

0.35 

$

$

0.27

0.26

$

$

0.27

0.26

$

$

0.28

0.28

13,660,539

14,039,741

14,238,680

14,413,578

13,971,112

14,631,940

14,529,142

14,702,189

The following is a presentation of the quarterly results of operations for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Quarters Ending

Interest income from Mortgage-
Backed Securities and cash

Interest expense on repurchase agreements

Net interest income

Gain on sale of 

Mortgage-Backed Securities
General and administrative expenses

Net income

Net income per share:

Basic

Dilutive

Average number of shares outstanding:

Basic

Dilutive

March 31,
1999

June 30,
1999

September 30,
1999

December 31,
1999

$22,014,941
17,151,041

4,863,900

$22,264,930
16,865,824

$22,161,272
17,232,086

$23,370,851  
18,597,255

5,399,106

4,929,186

4,773,596  

64,560
610,004 

25,853
561,010

97,656
513,600

266,713  
596,676  

$ 4,318,456

$ 4,863,949

$ 4,513,242

$ 4,443,633  

$

$

0.34 

0.33 

$

$

0.38

0.37

$

$

0.35

0.35 

$

$

0.33  

0.32  

12,657,884 

12,697,338

12,745,416

13,383,426  

12,952,822

13,110,275

13,025,096

13,992,414

| twenty-five |

Independent Auditors’ Report

To the Stockholders of
Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  statements  of  financial  condition 
of  Annaly  Mortgage  Management, Inc.
(the  “Company”)  as  of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity  and  cash  flows  for  the  years  then  ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s man-
agement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial 
statements based on our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  auditing  standards 
generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America. Those  standards
require  that  we  plan  and  perform  the  audits  to  obtain  reasonable 
assurance  about  whether  the  financial  statements  are  free  of  material
misstatement. An  audit  includes  examining, on  a  test  basis, evidence 
supporting  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the  financial  statements.
An  audit  also  includes  assessing  the  accounting  principles  used  and 
significant  estimates  made  by  management, as  well  as  evaluating  the
overall  financial  statement  presentation. We  believe  that  our  audits 
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2000
and  1999  and  the  results  of  its  operations  and  its  cash  flows  for  the 
years  then  ended  in  conformity  with  accounting  principles  generally 
accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche, L.L.P.
New York, New York
February 5, 2001

| twenty-six |

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.

Common Stock and Market Data

The Company’s Common Stock began trading October 8, 1997 on

the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol NLY.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low,
and closing sales prices per share of common stock as reported on the
New York  Stock  Exchange  composite  tape  and  the  cash  dividends
declared per share of our common stock.

Stock Prices

First Quarter ended March 31, 2000
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2000
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2000
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2000

First Quarter ended March 31, 1999
Second Quarter ended June 30, 1999
Third Quarter ended September 30, 1999
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 1999

First Quarter ended March 31, 2000
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2000
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2000
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2000

First Quarter ended March 31, 1999
Second Quarter ended June 30, 1999
Third Quarter ended September 30, 1999
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 1999

High

$ 9.25
$ 9.38
$ 9.50
$ 9.50

$ 10.25
$ 11.38
$ 11.50
$ 9.44

Low

Close

$ 8.88
$ 8.88
$ 9.13
$ 9.06

$10.25
$11.25
$ 9.31
$ 8.75

$ 7.19
$ 8.19
$ 8.06
$ 7.88

$ 7.94
$ 9.31
$ 9.19
$ 8.06

Cash 
Dividends
Declared 
Per Share

$ 0.35
$ 0.30
$ 0.25
$ 0.25

$ 0.33
$ 0.35
$ 0.35
$ 0.35

We intend to pay quarterly dividends and to make distributions to our
stockholders in amounts that all or substantially all of our taxable income
in  each  year  (subject  to  certain  adjustments)  is  distributed. This  will
enable us to qualify  for the tax benefits accorded to a REIT under the 

Code. All distributions will be made at the discretion of our Board and
will  depend  on  our  earnings, our  financial  condition, maintenance  of
our REIT status and such other factors as our Board of Directors may
deem relevant from time to time.

| twenty-seven |

Corporate Information

Corporate Officers

Board of Directors

Corporate Headquarters

Michael A.J. Farrell
Chairman of the Board &
Chief Executive Officer

Wellington J. St. Claire
Vice Chairman & 
Chief Investment Officer

Michael A.J. Farrell
Chairman of the Board &
Chief Executive Officer

Wellington J. St. Claire
Vice Chairman & 
Chief Investment Officer

Timothy J. Guba
President & Chief Operating Officer

Timothy J. Guba
President & Chief Operating Officer

Kathryn F. Fagan
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer

Kevin P. Brady
Founder & Principal 
KPB Associates

Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.
12 East 41st Street, Suite 700
New York, New York 10017
(888) 8ANNALY  

Legal Counsel

Brown & Wood L.L.P.
1666 K. Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20006-1208

Auditors

Deloitte & Touche L.L.P.
Two World Financial Center
New York, New York 10281-1434

Stock Transfer Agent

Jennifer A. Stephens
Senior Vice President & 
Corporate Secretary

James P. Fortescue
Vice President

Kristopher R. Konrad
Assistant Vice President

Rose-Marie Miller
Assistant Vice President

Spencer I. Browne
Former President & Chief Executive Officer
Asset Investors Corporation

Jonathan D. Green
President & Chief Executive Officer 
Rockefeller Group Development Corporation 

Shareholder inquiries concerning dividend 
payments, lost certificates, change of address:

John A. Lambiase
Former Managing Director 
Salomon Brothers, Inc.

Donnell A. Segalas
Phoenix Investment Partners, Ltd.

| twenty-eight |

Mellon Investor Services, L.L.C
PO Box 3315
South Hackensack, New Jersey  
07606-1915
(800) 370-1163
www.mellon-investor.com

Stock Exchange Listing

The common stock is listed on the New York
Stock Exchange (symbol: NLY)

Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be
held Thursday, May 17th, 2001 at 10 a.m. at:
The Union League Club
38 East 37th Street
New York, New York
Grant Room, 3M

Shareholder Communications

Copies of the Company’s Annual Report and
Financials may be obtained by writing the
Corporate Secretary, by calling the investor
relations hot line at 888-8ANNALY, or by
visiting our website at www.annaly.com

)

m
o
c
.
n
g
i
s
e
d
i
w

r
(

I

W
R

:

n
g
i
s
e
d

 
Annaly Mortgage Management, Inc.
12  East  41st  Street, Suite  700
New York, New York  10017

Phone: 212.696.0010
Fax: 212.696.9809

1-888-8ANNALY
annaly.com