More annual reports from Apricus Biosciences Inc.:
2017 ReportPeers and competitors of Apricus Biosciences Inc.:
Incannex Healthcare LimitedUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, DC 20549FORM 10-K (Mark One)x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _____ to ______ Commission file number 0-22245 NEXMED, INC(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Nevada87-0449967(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 350 Corporate Boulevard, Robbinsville, NJ 08691(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (609) 208-9688(Registrant’s telephone number) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each ClassName of Exchange on Which RegisteredCommon Stock, par value $.001The NASDAQ National Market Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to suchfiling requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not becontained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K orany amendment to this Form 10-K. x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes x No o As of March 11, 2005, 51,701,446 shares of the common stock, par value $.001, of the registrant were outstanding and the aggregate marketvalue of the common stock held by non-affiliates, based upon the last sale price of the registrant’s common stock on June 30, 2004, was approximately$87,814,906. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of our Proxy Statement to be delivered to our stockholders in connection with the Company’s 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the“2005 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report. NEXMED, INC.INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FILED WITHTHE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONYEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 ITEMS IN FORM 10-K Page PART I. Item 1.BUSINESS.1 Item 2.PROPERTIES.10 Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.11 Item 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.11 PART II.Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDERMATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES11 Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA12Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION ANDRESULTS OF OPERATIONS12 Item 7AQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK18 Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA19 Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTINGAND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE40 Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES40 Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION40 PART III. Item 10.DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT41 Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION41 Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS41 Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS42 Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES42PART IV. Item 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 42 PART I.ITEM 1. BUSINESS.Some of the statements contained in this Report discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial condition orstate other “forward-looking” information. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company and itsmanagement team. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risksand uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties includebut are not limited to, those risks and uncertainties set forth under the heading “Factors That Could Affect Our Future Results” of Part I of this Report. In lightof the significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this Report, the inclusion of such statements should not beregarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.GeneralNexMed, Inc. (the “Company,” which may be referred to as “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a pharmaceutical and medical technology company. We developand commercialize therapeutic products based on proprietary delivery systems. We are currently focusing our efforts on new and patented pharmaceuticalproducts based on a penetration enhancement drug delivery technology known as NexACT®, which may enable an active drug to be better absorbed throughthe skin.Products & TechnologiesWe have been in existence since 1987. Since 1994, we have positioned ourselves as a pharmaceutical and medical technology company with a focuson developing and commercializing therapeutic products based on proprietary delivery systems.We are currently focusing our efforts on new and patented topical pharmaceutical products based on a penetration enhancement drug deliverytechnology known as NexACT®, which may enable an active drug to be better absorbed through the skin. The NexACT® transdermal drug deliverytechnology is designed to enhance the absorption of an active drug through the skin, overcoming the skin's natural barrier properties and enabling highconcentrations of the active drug to rapidly penetrate the desired site of the skin or extremity. Successful application of the NexACT® technology wouldimprove therapeutic outcomes and reduce gastrointestinal or other systemic side effects that often accompany oral and injectable medications. We intend to continue our efforts developing topical treatments including cream, lacquer, gel, patch and tape, based on the application ofNexACT® technology to drugs: (1) previously approved by the FDA, (2) with proven efficacy and safety profiles, (3) with patents expiring or expired and (4)with proven market track records and potential.We are focusing on our application of the NexACT® technology to Alprox-TD® cream for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction. We areexploring the application of the NexACT® technology to other drug compounds and delivery systems, and are in various stages of developing new topicaltreatments for female sexual arousal disorder, nail fungus, premature ejaculation, wound healing, arthritic pain, severe pain and the prevention of nausea andvomiting associated with post-operative surgical procedures and cancer chemotherapy.In addition, we have been entertaining inquiries from other pharmaceutical companies that want to work with us utilizing the application ofNexACT® technology to develop proprietary pharmaceutical products as new drug products or improved products in order to extend the life cycle of theirexisting products.Alprox-TD® is an alprostadil-based cream treatment intended for patients with mild, moderate or severe erectile dysfunction. Our clinical studieshave demonstrated that NexACT® enhancers promote the rapid absorption of alprostadil and improve clinical responses. In December 2002, we completedtwo pivotal Phase 3 studies for Alprox-TD®, which tested over 1,700 patients at 85 sites throughout the U.S. The two pivotal studies were randomized,double-blind, placebo-controlled, and designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of Alprox-TD® in patients with varying degrees of erectile dysfunction.1On July 1, 2004, we entered into a license, supply and distribution agreement with Schering AG, Germany (“Schering”). This agreement providesSchering with exclusive commercialization rights to Alprox-TD® in approximately 75 countries including countries in Europe and the Middle East as well asSouth Africa, Australia and New Zealand. We will retain the intellectual property relating to Alprox-TD® and will manufacture and supply the product toSchering. Under the terms of this partnership, we will receive future milestone payments as well as a share of the revenue through transfer price paymentsbased on the supply of Alprox-TD®. The overall financial terms are intended, depending upon performance levels, to approximate an equal sharing of thevalue of the product. We continue to engage in discussions with several pharmaceutical companies, and are engaged in draft contract negotiations with oneof them, for the commercialization of Alprox-TD® in other markets, including the U.S. However, consummation of such additional arrangement(s) is subjectto the negotiation of complex contractual relationships, and we may not be able to negotiate such agreement(s) on a timely basis, if at all, or on termsacceptable to us.We have scheduled meetings during the first half of 2005 with various European regulatory authorities in connection with the MarketingAuthorization Application (comparable to the New Drug Application in the U.S.) for Alprox-TD® in the European Union (EU) markets. The purpose of thesemeetings is to determine the requirements for filing and what additional studies, if any, may be needed to file the Marketing Authorization Application. Theoutcome of these meetings will allow us to better formulate and finalize our strategy for obtaining approval for Alprox-TD® in Europe. We also want toensure that all European Union requirements are incorporated into the 12-month open-label safety study that we intend to initiate and conduct in the U.S.Prior to filing a New Drug Application or the Marketing Authorization Application for Alprox-TD®, we will be required to initiate a new 12-monthopen-label safety study. We had previously initiated an open-label study, which was halted in November 2002 due to FDA concerns about results of ourtransgenic mice study. However, we have determined with the FDA that completion of the open-label study is not a prerequisite for our New DrugApplication submission provided that the 12-month safety update on 100 patients is filed within four months after the New Drug Application submission. Weare required to have three hundred patients complete six months of testing in the study at the time of New Drug Application submission, and 100 patientsmust complete the 12-month study prior to New Drug Application approval. Patient completion requirements may be different in the EU and other markets.In late 2003, we met with the FDA to evaluate our Alprox-TD® New Drug Application package and to discuss possible product improvements. Atthat time, the FDA suggested that we include a transfer study of Alprox-TD® in female subjects as part of our New Drug Application submission. During thesame meeting, we proposed to the FDA a new and improved formulation of Alprox-TD®, to include in our New Drug Application filing. The FDA haspermitted us to switch to the new formulation if we conduct two bridging studies to confirm the efficacy of the new formulation. We continue to be engagedin discussions with the FDA concerning the regulatory plan for Alprox-TD® and intend to schedule a follow-up meeting in June or July 2005. We intend toobtain the FDA’s concurrence with our plan prior to initiating the above-mentioned studies, which will be conducted concurrently with the open-label studyand completed prior to the New Drug Application filing.The timeframe for us to begin these studies largely depends on our ability to substantially pre-fund these studies through additional partneringagreements for Alprox-TD® or from other sources, and on regulatory concurrence. We believe that we will be able to file the New Drug Application in theU.S. and in Europe, approximately ten and six months, respectively, after the completion of patient enrollment for the open-label study. Pending the outcomeof the meetings discussed above with European regulatory authorities in the first half of 2005, we anticipate that the timeframe for EU filings may be earlierthan for U.S. filings. However, these timeframes may change if we encounter any delay in financing, clinical testing or regulatory review. If we are not able tosuccessfully arrange financing through additional partnering agreements or from other sources in order to substantially pre-fund the studies described aboveor obtain timely and satisfactory regulatory review, we may be required to discontinue the development of Alprox-TD®. In addition, it is possible that we maynot have successful clinical results or receive regulatory approval on a timely basis, if at all.2In April 2002, Alprox-TD® was launched in Hong Kong under the Befar® trademark. The product, which has been selling in China since October2001, is manufactured and marketed by a local affiliate of Vergemont International Limited, our Asian licensee. We receive from our Asian licensee royaltypayments and payments for manufacturing supplies in connection with the distribution of Befar® in China and may receive such payments in other Asianmarkets once Befar® is approved for marketing in such other markets. The sale of Befar® has been slower than anticipated for several reasons. The switchingof distributors by our Asian licensee in China and in Hong Kong during 2003 significantly disrupted the sale of the product in the two markets. In addition,China has a limited number of patients who can afford erectile dysfunction treatments. In December 2002 and February 2003, our Asian licensee entered intolicensing agreements for two of our NexACT®-based products with CJ Pharmaceuticals, one of the five largest pharmaceutical companies in South Korea. Itsparent company, CJ Corporation, is a major conglomerate in South Korea. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, CJ Pharmaceuticals will develop, file forregulatory approval, market and distribute Befar® and Femprox® in South Korea.We are exploring the application of the NexACT® technology to other drug compounds and delivery systems. The furthest advanced of theseproducts is Femprox®, which is an alprostadil-based cream product intended for the treatment of female sexual arousal disorder. We have completed onePhase 2 study for Femprox® and intend to continue with its U.S. clinical development pending the availability of additional partnering agreements. InNovember 2004, we completed enrollment of a 400-patient study for Femprox® in China. where the cost for conducting clinical studies is significantly lowerthan in the U.S. We anticipate that top-line results will be available during the second quarter of 2005. The clinical data from this study will be shared withpotential co-development partners. In addition, the experience gained from this study will guide us in designing future U.S. studies.In September 2004, we filed an Investigational New Drug application with the FDA for NM100060, our proprietary nail lacquer treatment foronychomycosis. We had previously completed overseas, a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, blinded efficacy and safety study, whichenrolled 120 patients with various severities of big toenail fungal infection. The study was designed to evaluate the dose-response relationship of the efficacyand safety of the NM100060 lacquer. The data suggest that all three tested doses of the NM100060 lacquer were well tolerated by the patients, and theprimary efficacy rate was up to 60%. NM100060 is topically applied, and incorporates terbinafine, a currently marketed oral anti-fungal drug, with theNexACT® technology, which facilitates the permeation of the drug through the nail and into the nail bed. As a result, the NM100060 lacquer incorporates asignificantly lower dose of less than 1% of the oral dose. On February 2, 2005, we announced the initiation of our U.S. Phase 1 testing which we anticipatewill be completed during second quarter 2005. We anticipate that the combined data from this Phase 1 study along with studies that have been conductedoverseas will allow us, with FDA concurrence, to move into Phase 3 trials by the end of 2005. We are in active discussions with potential pharmaceuticalpartners who are interested in co-developing the product with us for the U.S. and other international markets.During the last 24 months, we have entered into a series of research and development agreements with Japanese pharmaceutical companies, todevelop new topical treatments for different indications. These agreements provided for modest signing payments, followed by additional payments based onthe achievement of certain milestones. We have completed all research and development work associated with these agreements and have recognized allrelated revenue and will recognize no further revenue related to these agreements. We anticipate that we will enter into additional research and developmentagreements during the next twelve months but we cannot assure you that we will be able to conclude any arrangement on a timely basis, if at all, or on termsacceptable to us.PatentsWe have twelve U.S. patents either acquired or received out of a series of patent applications that we have filed in connection with our NexACT®technology and our NexACT®-based products under development, such as Alprox-TD®, Femprox®, and our non-steroidal anti-inflammatory cream. To furtherstrengthen our global patent position on our proprietary products under development, and to expand the patent protection to other markets, we have filedunder the Patent Cooperation Treaty, corresponding international applications for our issued U.S. patents and pending U.S. patent applications.3The following table identifies our twelve U.S. patents issued for NexACT® technology and/or our NexACT®-based products under development,and the year of expiration for each patent:Patent NameExpiration Date Biodegradable Absorption Enhancers2008Biodegradable Absorption Enhancers2009Compositions and Methods for Amelioration of Human Female Sexual Dysfunction2017Topical Compositions for PGE1 Delivery2017Topical Compositions for Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Delivery2017Medicament Dispenser2019Crystalline Salts of dodecyl 2-(N, N-Dimethylamino)2019Topical Compositions Containing Prostaglandin E12019CIP: Topical Compositions Containing Prostaglandin E12019Prostaglandin Composition and Methods of Treatment of Male Erectile Dysfunction2020CIP: Prostaglandin Composition and Methods of Treatment of Male Erectile Dysfunction2020Topical Stabilized Prostaglandin E Compound Dosage Forms2023In addition, we have over 200 International patents and U.S. and International patent applications pending.Research and Development.Governmental authorities in the U.S. and other countries heavily regulate the testing, manufacture, labeling, advertising, marketing and distributionof our proposed products. None of our proprietary products under development, including the Alprox-TD® cream utilizing the NexACT® technology, hasbeen approved for marketing in the U.S. Before we market any products we develop, we must obtain FDA and comparable foreign agency approval throughan extensive clinical study and approval process.The studies involved in the approval process are conducted in three phases. In Phase 1 studies, researchers assess safety or the most common acuteadverse effects of a drug and examine the size of doses that patients can take safely without a high incidence of side effects. Generally, 20 to 100 healthyvolunteers or patients are studied in the Phase 1 study for a period of several months. In Phase 2 studies, researchers determine the drug's efficacy with short-term safety by administering the drug to subjects who have the condition the drug is intended to treat, assess whether the drug favorably affects the condition,and begin to identify the correct dosage level. Up to several hundred subjects may be studied in the Phase 2 study for approximately 6 to 12 months,depending on the type of product tested. In Phase 3 studies, researchers further assess efficacy and safety of the drug. Several hundred to thousands of patientsmay be studied during the Phase 3 studies for a period lasting from 12 months to several years. Upon completion of Phase 3 studies, a New Drug Applicationis submitted to the FDA or foreign governmental regulatory authority for review and approval.Segment and Geographic Area InformationYou can find information about our business segment and geographic areas of business in Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated FinancialStatements.EmployeesAs of March 1, 2005, we had 52 full time employees, 9 of whom have Ph.D degrees, 3 of whom are executive management and 36 of whom areengaged in research and development activities. We also rely on a number of consultants. None of our employees is represented by a collective bargainingagreement. We believe that we have a good relationship with our employees.4 Executive Officers of the RegistrantThe Executive Officers of the Company are set forth below.NameAge*TitleY. Joseph Mo, Ph.D.57Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer Vivian H. Liu43Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Kenneth F. Anderson58Vice President, Commercial Development * As of March 1, 2005Y. Joseph Mo, Ph.D., is, and has been since 1995, our Chief Executive Officer and President and Chairman and a member of our board of directors.His current term as member of our board of directors expires in 2005. Prior to joining us in 1995, Dr. Mo was President of Sunbofa Group, Inc., a privately-held investment consulting company. From 1991 to 1994, he was President of the Chemical Division, and from 1988 to 1994, the Vice President ofManufacturing and Medicinal Chemistry, of Greenwich Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Prior to that, he served in various executive positions with several majorpharmaceutical companies, including Johnson & Johnson, Rorer Pharmaceuticals, and predecessors of SmithKline Beecham. Dr. Mo received his Ph.D. inIndustrial and Physical Pharmacy from Purdue University in 1977.Vivian H. Liu is, and has been, our Vice President of Corporate Affairs and Secretary since September 1995 and Chief Financial Officer since January2004. In 1994, while we were in a transition period, Ms. Liu served as our Chief Executive Officer. From September 1995 to September 1997, Ms. Liu was ourTreasurer. From 1985 to 1994, she was a business and investment adviser to the government of Quebec and numerous Canadian companies with respect toproduct distribution, technology transfer and investment issues. Ms. Liu received her MPA in International Finance from the University of SouthernCalifornia and her BA from the University of California, Berkeley.Kenneth F. Anderson is and has been, our Vice President of Commercial Development since November 2000. Mr. Anderson has extensive experiencein the pharmaceutical industry. From 1997 to September 2000, Mr. Anderson was Senior Vice President, Director of Strategy and Business Development forHarrison Wilson & Associates, a consulting and marketing firm specializing in healthcare products and services. From 1980 to 1997, Mr. Anderson was atBristol-Myers Squibb where he served in various management positions, including Senior Manager for Marketing and Director for Worldwide BusinessDevelopment. From 1969 to 1979, Mr. Anderson was with Parke-Davis, a division of Warner Lambert. Mr. Anderson received his BA from Boston University.WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATIONWe file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and we have anInternet website address at http://www.nexmed.com. We make available free of charge on our internet website address our annual report on Form 10-K,quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. You may also read and copy anydocument we file at the Securities and Exchange Commission's public reference room located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please callthe Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-732-0330 for further information on the operation of such public reference room. You also can requestcopies of such documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the Securities and Exchange Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington,D.C. 20549 or obtain copies of such documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov.5FACTORS THAT COULD AFFECT OUR FUTURE RESULTSRISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANYWe have a continuing need for additional financing.Our cash position as of March 1, 2005 was approximately $6.2 million, following successful completion of a private placement in December 2004 ofcommon stock and warrants, yielding gross proceeds to us of approximately $7 million. We have been actively seeking financing from the sale of equity orissuance of debt from private and public sources as well as from collaborative licensing and/or marketing arrangements with third parties, and since December31, 2002, we have raised approximately $42 million gross proceeds through the sale of Preferred Stock, the exercise of warrants to purchase shares of ourcommon stock and the issuance by the Company of notes, Common Stock and warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock. Our anticipated cashrequirements for Alprox-TD® through the anticipated New Drug Application filing, including completion of an open-label and other studies, will beapproximately $15 million. Initiation, but not completion of an open-label study is a prerequisite for our new drug application submission. There is noassurance that we will be successful in obtaining financing on acceptable terms, if at all. If additional financing cannot be obtained on reasonable terms,future operations may need to be scaled back or discontinued.We continue to incur operating losses.Our current business operations began in 1994 and we have a limited operating history. We may encounter delays, uncertainties and complicationstypically encountered by development stage businesses. We have generated minimal revenues from the limited sales of Befar® in Asia and our existingresearch and development agreements with our Japanese partners, and have not marketed or generated revenues in the U.S. from our products underdevelopment. We are not profitable and have incurred an accumulated deficit of $102,245,183 since our inception and through December 31, 2004. Ourability to generate revenues and to achieve profitability and positive cash flow will depend on the successful commercialization of our products currentlyunder development. However, even if we eventually generate revenues from sales of our products currently under development, we expect to incur significantoperating losses over the next several years. Our ability to become profitable will depend, among other things, on our (1) development of our proposedproducts, (2) obtaining of regulatory approvals of our proposed products on a timely basis and (3) success in manufacturing, distributing and marketing ourproposed products.Our independent registered public accounting firm has doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. As a result of our losses to date, expected losses in the future, limited capital resources and accumulated deficit, our independent registered publicaccounting firm has concluded that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern, and accordingly, our independent registeredpublic accounting firm has modified their report on our December 31, 2004 consolidated financial statements included herein in the form of an explanatoryparagraph describing the events that have given rise to this uncertainty. These factors may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional funding to meetour obligations. Our continuation is dependent upon our ability to generate or obtain sufficient cash to meet our obligations on a timely basis and ultimatelyto attain profitable operations. We anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses at least until successful commercialization of one or more of ourproducts, and we may never operate profitably in the future.We will need significant additional funding to continue with our research and development efforts. Our research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, were $10,684,477, $8,439,340 and $21,615,787,respectively. Since January 1, 1994, when we repositioned ourselves as a medical and pharmaceutical technology company, and through December 31, 2004we have spent $69,819,165 on research and development. While our expenses for research and development were significantly lower in 2003 than in 2002,they increased in 2004. Given our current level of cash reserves and low rate of revenue generation, we will not be able to fully advance the development ofour products unless we raise additional cash through financing from the sale of our securities and/or through additional partnering agreements. If we aresuccessful in entering into additional partnering agreements for our products under development, we may receive milestone payments, which will offset someof our research and development expenses.6As indicated above, our anticipated cash requirements for Alprox-TD® through the anticipated New Drug Application filing, including completionof an open-label and other studies, will be approximately $15 million. Initiation, but not completion of an open-label study is a prerequisite for our New DrugApplication filing.We will also need significant funding to pursue our overall product development plans. In general, our products under development will requiresignificant time-consuming and costly research and development, clinical testing, regulatory approval and significant additional investment prior to theircommercialization. The research and development activities we conduct may not be successful; our products under development may not prove to be safeand effective; our clinical development work may not be completed; and the anticipated products may not be commercially viable or successfully marketed.Commercial sales of our products cannot begin until we receive final FDA approval. The earliest time for such final approval of the first product which maybe approved, Alprox-TD®, is sometime in late 2006. We intend to focus our current development efforts on the Alprox-TD® cream treatment, which is in thelate clinical development stage. We currently have no sales force or marketing organization and will need, but may be unable, to attract or afford qualified or experienced marketingand sales personnel. In order to market Alprox-TD® in areas not covered under the Schering AG agreement and for our other proprietary products underdevelopment, additional marketing partner(s) will need to spend significant funds to inform potential customers, including third-party distributors, of thedistinctive characteristics and benefits of our products. Our operating results and long term success will depend, among other things, on our ability toestablish (1) successful arrangements with domestic and additional international distributors and marketing partners and (2) an effective internal marketingorganization. We are currently engaged in discussions with several pharmaceutical companies regarding possible strategic marketing partnership(s) for theAlprox-TD® cream in markets not covered under the Schering AG agreement, including the U.S. However, in each case consummation of the transaction issubject to the negotiation of complex contractual relationships, and we may not be able to negotiate such agreements on a timely basis, if at all, or on termsacceptable to us.Pre-clinical and clinical trials are inherently unpredictable. If we do not successfully complete these trials, we will not be able to market our products. Through pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, we must demonstrate that our products are safe and effective for their indicated uses. Results frompre-clinical studies and early clinical trials may not allow us to predict results in later-stage testing. Our future clinical trials may not demonstrate the safetyand effectiveness of our products or may not result in regulatory approval to market our products. The failure of the FDA to approve our products forcommercial sales will have a material adverse effect on our prospects.Patents and intellectual property rights are important to us but could be challenged.Proprietary protection for our pharmaceutical products is of material importance to our business in the U.S. and most other countries. We havesought and will continue to seek proprietary protection for our products to attempt to prevent others from commercializing equivalent products insubstantially less time and at substantially lower expense. Our success may depend on our ability to (1) obtain effective patent protection within the U.S. andinternationally for our proprietary technologies and products, (2) defend patents we own, (3) preserve our trade secrets, and (4) operate without infringingupon the proprietary rights of others.While we have obtained patents and have several patent applications pending, the extent of effective patent protection in the U.S. and othercountries is highly uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions. No consistent policy addresses the breadth of claims allowed in or the degreeof protection afforded under patents of medical and pharmaceutical companies. Patents we currently own or may obtain might not be sufficiently broad toprotect us against competitors with similar technology. Any of our patents could be invalidated or circumvented.There have been patents issued to others such as Vivus, Inc. and MacroChem Corporation on the use of alprostadil for the treatment of male orfemale sexual dysfunction. While we believe that our patents will prevail in any potential litigation, the holders of these competing patents could determineto commence a lawsuit against us and even prevail in any such lawsuit. Litigation could result in substantial cost to and diversion of effort by us, which mayharm our business. In addition, our efforts to protect or defend our proprietary rights may not be successful or, even if successful, may result in substantial costto us.7We depend upon third party manufacturers for our chemical manufacturing supplies.We depend on third party chemical manufacturers for alprostadil, the active drugs in Alprox-TD® and in other NexACT®-based products underdevelopment, and for the supply of our NexACT® enhancers that are essential in the formulation and production of our products, on a timely basis and atsatisfactory quality levels. If our validated third party chemical manufacturers fail to produce quality products on time and in sufficient qualities, our resultswould suffer, as we would encounter costs and delays in revalidating new third party suppliers.We may not successfully validate our manufacturing facility for GMP compliance.In 2002, we completed the construction of a 31,500 square foot industrial facility, located in East Windsor, New Jersey, which we are in the processof developing and validating as a manufacturing facility designed to meet the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards as required by the FDA. Weanticipate that our manufacturing facility will have the capacity to meet our anticipated needs for full-scale commercial production. However, we are initiallyutilizing the facility to manufacture Alprox-TD® and other NexACT®-based products under development for continuing clinical testing purposes and at thesame time validating the facility for GMP compliance, which is a requirement for our new drug application filing with the FDA. If we do not successfully passthe Pre-Approved Inspection conducted by the FDA, our new drug application filing will be delayed.We face severe competition.We are engaged in a highly competitive industry. We expect competition from numerous existing companies, including large internationalenterprises, and others entering the industry. Most of these companies have greater research and development, manufacturing, marketing, financial,technological, personnel and managerial resources. Acquisitions of competing companies by large pharmaceutical or healthcare companies could furtherenhance such competitors' financial, marketing and other resources. Competitors may complete clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals and commencecommercial sales of their products before we could enjoy a significant competitive advantage. Products developed by our competitors may be more effectivethan our products.Certain treatments for erectile dysfunction, such as needle injection therapy, vacuum constriction devices, penile implants, transurethral absorptionand oral medications, currently exist, have been approved for sale in certain markets and are being improved. Currently known products for the treatment oferectile dysfunction developed or under development by our competitors include the following: (1) Caverject®, Pfizer, Inc.'s needle injection therapy; (2)Viagra®, Pfizer, Inc.'s oral product to treat erectile dysfunction; (3) Cialis®, an oral formulation marketed in the U.S. through a joint venture between ICOSand Eli Lilly & Co.; (4) Levitra®, an oral medication marketed through a collaborative effort of Schering-Plough and GlaxoSmithKline, Inc. and (5) Muse®,Vivus, Inc.'s device for intra-urethral delivery of a suppository containing alprostadil. In addition, products currently under development include thefollowing: (1) Topiglan®, a topical treatment containing alprostadil based on a proprietary drug delivery system under development by MacroChemCorporation; (2) PT-141, an intra-nasal treatment containing a new peptide under development by Palatin Technologies; and (3) an intranasal apomorphinetreatment under development by Nastech.We have been the subject of several lawsuits and may be subject of potential product liability and other claims, creating risk and expense.A lawsuit was filed with the Superior court of New Jersey on April 1, 2003 by a former employee against the Company for a $800,000 bonus amountthat he believes he should have received upon completion of the construction of the Company's East Windsor manufacturing facility. The Company hasengaged counsel to defend its position. The Company intends to defend itself vigorously against this claim and believes it has a valid defense; however, thecase is still in the preliminary stages and the likely outcome cannot be predicted, nor can a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss, if any, be made. 8We are also exposed to potential product liability risks inherent in the development, testing, manufacturing, marketing and sale of humantherapeutic products. Product liability insurance for the pharmaceutical industry is extremely expensive, difficult to obtain and may not be available onacceptable terms, if at all. We currently have liability insurance to cover claims related to our products that may arise from clinical trials, with coverage of $1million for any one claim and coverage of $3 million in total, but we do not maintain product liability insurance and we may need to acquire such insurancecoverage prior to the commercial introduction of our products. If we obtain such coverage, we have no guarantee that the coverage limits of such insurancepolicies will be adequate. A successful claim against us if we are uninsured, or which is in excess of our insurance coverage, if any, could have a materialadverse effect upon us and on our financial condition.Our Stock may be delisted from Nasdaq, which may make it more difficult for you to sell your shares.Currently, our common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market. NASD Marketplace Rule 4450 provides that a company must comply withcontinuing listing criteria to maintain its Nasdaq listing. Included in such criteria is a minimum bid price per share of $1.00. Failure to maintain such price fora period of time and beyond a grace period could lead to delisting from the Nasdaq National Market.If we were to be delisted from the Nasdaq National Market, our common stock would be listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, assuming we meetthose listing requirements. If we failed to meet the Nasdaq SmallCap listing requirements, our stock would be considered a penny stock under regulations ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission and would therefore be subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers whosell our securities. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements could discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions inour common stock, which could severely limit the market liquidity of the common stock and your ability to sell our securities in the secondary market. Inaddition, if we fail to obtain a SmallCap listing, we will be subject to cash penalties under the Investor Rights Agreement and other investor rightsagreements to which we are a party until a listing is obtained.INDUSTRY RISKSWe are subject to numerous and complex government regulations which could result in delay and expense.Governmental authorities in the U.S. and other countries heavily regulate the testing, manufacture, labeling, distribution, advertising and marketingof our proposed products. None of our proprietary products under development has been approved for marketing in the U.S. Before we market any productswe develop, we must obtain FDA and comparable foreign agency approval through an extensive clinical study and approval process.Our failure to obtain requisite governmental approvals for our products under development in a timely manner or at all would delay or preclude usfrom licensing or marketing our products or limit the commercial use of our products, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition andresults of operations.Because we intend to sell and market our products outside the U.S., we will be subject to foreign regulatory requirements governing the conduct ofclinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursements. These requirements vary widely from country to country. Our failure to meet each foreigncountry's requirements could delay the introduction of our proposed products in the respective foreign country and limit our revenues from sales of ourproposed products in foreign markets.Successful commercialization of our products may depend on the availability of reimbursement to the consumer from third-party healthcare payers,such as government and private insurance plans. Even if we succeed in bringing one or more products to market, reimbursement to consumers may not beavailable or sufficient to allow us to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development or to sell our products on a competitive basis. Inaddition, in certain foreign markets, pricing or profitability of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental controls. In the U.S., federal and stateagencies have proposed similar governmental control and the U.S. Congress has recently considered legislative and regulatory reforms that may affectcompanies engaged in the healthcare industry. Pricing constraints on our products in foreign markets and possibly in the U.S. could adversely affect ourbusiness and limit our revenues.9We are vulnerable to volatile market conditions.The market prices for securities of biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including ours, have been highly volatile. The market has fromtime to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. In addition, futureannouncements, such as the results of testing and clinical trials, the status of our relationships with third-party collaborators, technological innovations ornew therapeutic products, governmental regulation, developments in patent or other proprietary rights, litigation or public concern as to the safety ofproducts developed by us or others and general market conditions, concerning us, our competitors or other biopharmaceutical companies, may have asignificant effect on the market price of our common stock.RISKS RELATED TO OWNING OUR COMMON STOCKWe do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.Although our shareholders may receive dividends, if as and when declared by our board of directors, we do not intend to pay dividends on ourCommon Stock in the foreseeable future. Therefore, you should not purchase our Common Stock if you need immediate or future income by way ofdividends from your investment.We may issue additional shares of our capital stock that could dilute the value of your shares of Common Stock.We are authorized to issue 90,000,000 shares of our capital stock, consisting of 80,000,000 shares of our Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares ofour preferred stock, of which 1,000,000 are designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and 800 are designated as Series B 8% CumulativeConvertible Preferred Stock. As of March 11, 2005, 51,701,446 shares of our Common Stock were issued and outstanding and 17,891,169 shares of ourCommon Stock were issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants, or other convertible securities (including warrants and convertible notesheld by certain selling shareholders). There were no shares of Preferred Stock outstanding at March 11, 2005. In light of our need for additional financing, wemay issue authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock at below current market prices or additional convertible securities that could dilute the earningsper share and book value of your shares of our Common Stock.In addition to provisions providing for proportionate adjustments in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, reverse stock splits and similarevents, certain warrants provide (with certain exceptions) for an adjustment of the exercise price if we issue shares of common stock at prices lower than theexercise price or the then prevailing market price. This means that if we need to raise equity financing at a time when the market price for our common stockis lower than the exercise price, or if we need to provide a new equity investor with a discount from the then prevailing market price, then the exercise pricewill be reduced and the dilution to shareholders increased.ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.We currently have our principal executive offices and laboratories in Robbinsville, NJ. We lease approximately 24,000 square feet of space forapproximately $25,500 per month pursuant to a lease which expires in March 2006. We also lease approximately 5,000 square feet of laboratory space inMonmouth Junction, NJ for approximately $14,000 per month pursuant to a lease which expires in May 2006.We own our 31,500 square foot manufacturing facility in East Windsor, New Jersey. We purchased the facility for $2.2 million and have investedapproximately $7.2 million for construction, equipment and FDA GMP development.NexMed International Limited subleases 1,000 square feet of office space in Hong Kong for approximately $3,000 per month pursuant to a month-to-month arrangement.10ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. A lawsuit was filed with the Superior court of New Jersey on April 1, 2003 by a former employee against the Company for a $800,000 bonus amountthat he believes he should have received upon completion of the construction of the Company's East Windsor manufacturing facility. The Company hasengaged counsel to defend its position. The Company intends to defend itself vigorously against this claim and believes it has a valid defense; however, thecase is still in the preliminary stages and the likely outcome cannot be predicted, nor can a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss, if any, be made.ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2004. PART II. ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OFEQUITY SECURITIES.Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market System ( “NASDAQ”) under the symbol “NEXM.” The following table sets forth the range of the high and low sales prices as reported by NASDAQ for each quarter from January 1, 2003 to December31, 2004. Price of Common Stock ($) High Low 2003 First Quarter 2.20 0.75 Second Quarter 5.25 1.09 Third Quarter 4.83 2.56 Fourth Quarter 5.65 3.35 2004 First Quarter 4.70 2.20 Second Quarter 3.45 1.46 Third Quarter 2.44 1.25 Fourth Quarter 1.69 1.20 On March 11, 2005, the last reported sales price for our Common Stock on NASDAQ was $1.27 per share, and we had 250 holders of record of ourCommon Stock.Dividends We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not have any plans to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our board ofdirectors anticipates that any earnings that might be available to pay dividends will be retained to finance our business.11ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.The following selected financial information is qualified by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s consolidatedfinancial statements and the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” containedelsewhere herein. Income Statement Data 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Revenue Product sales and royalties $9,519 $6,206 $63,417 $68,089 0 Research and development fees $349,850 $104,537 $84,611 0 0 Net Loss $(17,023,648)$(17,233,566)$(27,641,519)$(16,174,861)$(8,720,553)Basic and Diluted Loss per Share ($0.39)$(0.60)$(1.03)$(0.63)$(0.40)Weighted Average Common SharesOutstanding Used for Basic and DilutedLoss per Share 43,603,546 33,649,774 26,937,200 25,486,465 21,868,267 Balance Sheet Data December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Assets $20,272,661 $23,133,679 $14,140,127 $27,314,713 $39,989,682 Total Long Term Liabilities $6,801,826 $7,335,877 $5,782,518 $724,577 $0 Stockholders’ Equity $11,401,285 $12,723,408 $3,223,492 $24,107,865 $38,744,175 We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.General We are focusing our application of the NexACT® technology to Alprox-TD® cream for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction. We have exploredthe application of the NexACT® technology to other drug compounds and delivery systems, and are in various stages of developing new treatments forfemale sexual arousal disorder, nail fungus, premature ejaculation, wound healing, arthritic pain, severe pain, and the prevention of nausea and vomitingassociated with post-operative surgical procedures and cancer chemotherapy.We intend to pursue our research, development, and execute a business strategy with the goal of achieving a level of development sufficient toenable us to attract potential strategic partners with resources sufficient to further develop and market our proprietary products both domestically andinternationally. Liquidity and Capital ResourcesWe have experienced net losses and negative cash flow from operations each year since our inception. Through December 31, 2004, we had anaccumulated deficit of $102,245,183. Our operations have principally been financed through private placements of equity securities and debt financing.Funds raised in past periods should not be considered an indication of our ability to raise additional funds in any future periods. Pursuant to a Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated December 17, 2004, we raised over $7 million in gross proceeds. We sold5,495,310 shares of our common stock at $1.28 per share. The investors received five-year warrants to purchase 2,198,126 shares of common stock,exercisable beginning six months after closing at a price of $1.47 per share. In addition, the investors also received one-year warrants to purchase 549,536shares of common stock, exercisable at a price of $2.00 per share. The proceeds from this financing are being used for general corporate purposes and for ourproduct development programs based on the NexACT® technology.12As a result of our losses to date, expected losses in the future, limited capital resources and accumulated deficit, our independent registered publicaccounting firm has concluded that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time, and havemodified their report in the form of an explanatory paragraph describing the events that have given rise to this uncertainty. These factors may make it moredifficult for us to obtain additional funding to meet our obligations. Our continuation is based on our ability to generate or obtain sufficient cash to meet ourobligations on a timely basis and ultimately to attain profitable operations. We anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses at least untilsuccessful commercialization of one or more of our products. There can be no assurance that we can operate profitably in the future.At December 31, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securities and short-term investments of approximately $9.13 million ascompared to $10.98 million at December 31, 2003. To date, we have spent approximately $66 million on the Alprox-TD® development program, andanticipate that we will spend approximately an additional $15 million to complete the clinical program and file the new drug application for Alprox-TD®.During 2004, we expended approximately $15.7 million in cash, which consisted of a $1.3 million to a contract research organization for set-up andinitiation costs for the planned clinical studies for Alprox-TD®, approximately $500,000 paid to employees for the 2003 bonuses accrued in December of2003, approximately $2.1 million in out of pocket development costs related to other NexACT® -based products, including approximately $1.9 millionrelated to the NM100060 lacquer, approximately $540,000 in legal fees related to ongoing lawsuits as well as approximately $520,000 in professional feesrelated to additional compliance activities mandated by the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, as well as our fixed monthly overhead costs of approximately$900,000 per month. We project that our cash reserves are sufficient to sustain operations for 5 months at our current expenditure level, which includes fixedmonthly overhead expenses and the projected out of pocket project costs related to NexACT® -based products other than Alprox-TD®. We anticipate that ourmonthly rate of cash expenditures will increase significantly upon initiating the planned clinical studies for Alprox-TD® and the NM100060 lacquer. Thetimeframe for us to begin these studies largely depends on our ability to obtain financing through additional partnering agreements for Alprox-TD® and theNM100060 lacquer or from other sources, and on regulatory review.At December 31, 2004, we recorded significantly less non-cash interest expense charges from convertible notes than at December 31, 2003, since in2003 we wrote-off the discount attributable to the $5 million convertible notes converted to common stock in 2003.At December 31, 2004 we recorded significantly higher non-cash compensation expense as compared to 2003. The increase is largely attributable toour CEO’s 2003 bonus of approximately $400,000 that was paid in stock in 2004. At December 31, 2004, we had $277,660 in payroll related liabilities as compared to $1,273,303 at December 31, 2003. The decrease is attributableto 2003 bonuses of $1,074,400 that were accrued in 2003 but paid in 2004. We did not approve bonuses for 2004, and therefore there are no bonuses accruedat December 31, 2004.At December 31, 2004, we had no deferred revenue as compared to $128,708 at December 31, 2003. The decrease is the result of our recognition ofall of the revenue deferred at December 31, 2003 related to our research and development projects for our Japanese partners. We have completed all researchand development work associated with these agreements and have recognized all related revenue.We have spent approximately $9.4 million in total for the land, building, manufacturing and lab equipment, and GMP development as related to ourEast Windsor manufacturing facility and estimate that an additional $2 million, approximately, will be spent prior to the FDA pre-approval inspection for thefacility. 13We lease office space and research facilities under operating lease agreements expiring through 2007. We also lease equipment from GE Capitalunder capital leases expiring through 2006 (Note 6 of the Financial Statements). The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and the periodsin which payments are due as of December 31. 2004: Less than 1 - 3 3 - 5 More than Contractual Obligations Total 1 year years years 5 years Long-term debt * $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 Capital lease obligations 931,915 690,816 241,099 0 0 Operating leases 572,301 469,378 102,923 0 0 Purchase obligations ** 11,541,922 2,560,859 8,981,063 0 0 Other long-term liabilities*** 2,625,000 0 0 0 2,625,000 Total $21,671,138 $3,721,053 $15,325,085 $0 $2,625,000 *Long-term debt consists of two notes that are convertible to common stock at the option of the noteholders.**Purchase obligations consist of clinical research agreements that can be cancelled at any time with thirty days notice. The penalty for ourcancellation of one of the agreements totaling $10,246,000 is 10% of the oustanding contract amount at the time of cancellation.***Represents the fully vested payments to be made according to a deferred compensation agreement. The partially vested present value of $568,000 ofthis obligation is reflected on our balance sheet in other long term liabilities. In February 2001, we entered into a financial arrangement with GE Capital Corporation for a line of credit, which provided for the financing of up to$5 million of equipment and expired in March 2002. As of March 31, 2002, we had financed $1,113,459 of equipment purchases under this GE credit line,and as of December 31, 2004, there was an outstanding balance due GE of $57,832 under this facility which is payable in monthly installments throughvarious dates in 2005 and which is reflected in the above table under capital lease obligations.In January 2002, GE approved a new credit line, which provided for the financing of up to $3 million of equipment and expired on December 31,2002. We accessed $1,111,427 of this credit line, and as of December 31, 2004, there was an outstanding balance due GE of $375,571 under the January2002 facility, which is payable in 42 monthly installments from the date of take-down and which is reflected in the above table under capital leaseobligations.In July 2003, GE approved a new credit line, which expired in July 2004 and provided for the financing of up to $1.85 million of equipment. Weaccessed $738,731 of this credit line, and as of December 31, 2004, there was an outstanding balance due GE of $444,473 under the July 2003 facility whichis payable in 36 monthly installments from the date of take-down and which is reflected in the above table under capital lease obligations.Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsWe do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.Critical Accounting EstimatesOur discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which havebeen prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Note 2 in the Notes to the ConsolidatedFinancial Statements, includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our Consolidated FinancialStatements. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts ofassets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Our accounting policies affect our more significantjudgments and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following is a briefdescription of the more significant accounting policies and related estimate methods that we follow:Income Taxes - In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates of our current tax exposure and temporary differences resulting from timingdifferences for reporting items for book and tax purposes. We recognize deferred taxes by the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets andliabilities at enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in taxrates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In addition, valuation allowances are established when necessary to reducedeferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.14Critical Estimate: In consideration of our accumulated losses and lack of historical ability to generate taxable income to utilize our deferred taxassets, we have estimated that we will not be able to realize any benefit from our temporary differences and have recorded a full valuation allowance. If webecome profitable in the future at levels which cause management to conclude that it is more likely than not that we will realize all or a portion of the netoperating loss carry-forward, we would immediately record the estimated net realized value of the deferred tax asset at that time and would then provide forincome taxes at a rate equal to our combined federal and state effective rates, which would be approximately 40% under current tax laws. Subsequentrevisions to the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary significantly from period to period.Long-lived assets -- We review for the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of anasset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of theasset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. If such assets are considered impaired, the amount of the impairment loss recognized ismeasured as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, fair value being determined based upon discounted cashflows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset. We have not identified any such impairment losses.Critical Estimate: Estimated undiscounted future cash flows are based on sales projections for our products under development for which the long-lived assets are used. In 2004, we performed a review for impairment of our manufacturing facility based on projections of sales of our product candidates, forwhich the facility is anticipated to be ultimately utilized. Overestimating the future cash flows resulting from the commercialization of Alprox TD may leadto overstating the carrying value of the manufacturing facility by not identifying an impairment loss.Revenue recognition -- Revenues from product sales are recognized upon delivery of products to customers, less allowances for returns anddiscounts. Royalty revenue is recognized upon the sale of the related products, provided the royalty amounts are fixed or determinable and the amounts areconsidered collectible. Revenues earned under research and development contracts are recognized in accordance with the cost-to-cost method outlined inStaff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, as amended, whereby the extent of progress toward completion is measured on the cost-to-cost basis; however, revenuerecognized at any point will not exceed the cash received. If the current estimates of total contract revenue and contract cost indicate a loss, a provision forthe entire loss on the contract would be made. All costs related to these agreements are expensed as incurred and classified within “Research anddevelopment” expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Research and development expenses include costs directlyattributable to the conduct of our research and development, including salaries, payroll taxes, employee benefits, materials, supplies, depreciation on andmaintenance of research equipment, costs related to research and development fee agreements, the cost of services provided by outside contractors, includingservices related to our clinical trials, clinical trial expenses, the full cost of manufacturing drugs for use in research, pre-clinical and clinical development, andthe allocable portion of facility costs.Critical Estimate: In calculating the progress made toward completion of a research contract, we must compare costs incurred to date to the totalestimated cost of the project. We estimate the cost of any given project based on our past experience in product development as well as the past experience ofour research staff in their areas of expertise. Underestimating the total cost of a research contract may cause us to accelerate the revenue recognized undersuch contract. Conversely, overestimating the cost may cause us to delay revenue recognized.Stock based compensation -- In preparing our financial statements, we must calculate the value of stock options issued to employees as well as non-employee contractors. The fair value of each option and warrant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is a generally accepted method of estimating the value of stock options and warrants.15Critical Estimate: The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires us to estimate the Company’s dividend yield rate, expected volatility and riskfree interest rate over the life of the option. Inaccurately estimating any one of these factors may cause the value of the option to be under or over estimated.See Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the current estimates used in the Black -Scholes pricing model.Comparison of Results of Operations between the Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.Revenues. We recorded revenues of $359,369 during the twelve months of operations in 2004 as compared to $110,743 during the same period in2003. The revenue consisted of $9,519 and $6,206, respectively, in royalties on sales of Befar® in Hong Kong and China received from our Asian licenseeand $349,850 and $104,537, respectively, of revenue recognized on our research and development agreements with Japanese pharmaceutical companies. Theincrease in research and development fee revenue in 2004 is the result of the completion in 2004 of all research and development work associated with theseagreements and the recognition of all related revenue. Research and Development Expenses. Our research and development expenses for 2004 and 2003 were $10,684,477 and $8,439,340 respectively.Research and development expenses included $2,811,523 attributable to Alprox-TD® in 2004, and $2,279,848 attributable to NM100060 with the balanceattributable to other NexACT® technology based products and indirect overhead related to research and development, as compared to $2,885,020 for Alprox-TD® and $393,858 for NM 100060 during the same period in 2003. There was a significant increase in expenses related to NM 100060 as preclinical activityincreased with the filing of the investigational new drug application in 2004 and with the planned clinical trials to begin in 2005. We anticipate that,assuming available funding, total research and development spending in 2005 will increase significantly with the completion of the remaining Alprox-TDclinical studies which will cost approximately $15 million and the anticipated filing of the new drug application for Alprox-TD in 2006; the increase inefforts and resources on the application of the NexACT® technology to other drug compounds and delivery systems for the development of new productsincluding the planned clinical development program for NM 100060; and the filing of investigational new drug applications for some of the NexACT®-based products under development which would include the initiation of Phase 1 and 2 clinical studies in the U.S. General and Administrative Expenses. Our general and administrative expenses were $6,979,730 in 2004 as compared to $5,900,569 in 2003. Theincrease is largely attributable to increased legal fees related to lawsuits as well as professional fees related to additional compliance activities mandated bythe Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Additionally, we have been steadily increasing expenses since the second half of 2003 in order to return to the general andadministrative support levels that are necessary to operate the Company under the scaled up Alprox-TD® and other NexACT®-based products developmentprograms. We anticipate that General and Administrative expenses in 2005 will remain consistent with 2004 expenses.Other income (expense). Other income was $82,271 during 2004 as compared to other expense of $152,867 during the same period in 2003. Theother income for 2004 consists of a one-time payment that the Company received upon cancellation of a research and development agreement with aJapanese pharmaceutical company partially offset by a loss on the sale of marketable securities. The 2003 expense was attributable to the sale at a loss ofmarketable securities and the disposition of equipment at a loss in order to generate additional cash.Interest Expense. We recognized $425,128 in interest expense in 2004 as compared to $3,159,338 in interest expense during 2003. The significantdecrease is the result of a decrease in the amortization of note discounts related to our convertible notes.Net Loss. The net loss was $17,023,648 and $17,233,566 in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The slight decrease is primarily attributable to increasedrevenues and a significant decrease in interest expense offset by an increase in research and development expenses related to our product developmentprograms for Alprox-TD® and NM100060 as well as increased legal fees related to lawsuits and increased professional fees related to additional complianceactivities mandated by the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. We anticipate that net loss in 2005 will increase significantly with the increased expenses related toclinical activities and new drug application filing for Alprox-TD®, and planned development activities for other NexACT®-based products underdevelopment including the clinical development program for NM 100060.16Net Loss applicable to Common Stock. The net loss applicable to common stock was $17,023,648 or $0.39 per share for 2004 as compared to$20,351,410 or $0.60 per share for 2003. The decrease in net loss applicable to common stock is primarily attributable to a deemed dividend related to thebeneficial conversion feature of our preferred stock issued in 2003 as well as an increase in the total number of weighted average shares outstanding from33,649,744 to 43,603,546.Comparison of Results of Operations between the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.Revenues. We recorded revenues of $110,743 during the twelve months of operations in 2003 as compared to $148,028 during the same period in2002. The 2003 revenues consisted of $6,206 in royalties on sales received from our Asian licensee and $104,537 of revenue recognized on our research anddevelopment agreements with Japanese pharmaceutical companies. During 2003, we received an additional $128,708 from research and developmentagreements with Japanese pharmaceutical companies, which we recognized as revenues in 2004. Cost of Products Sold. Our cost of products sold was nil and $27,030 in 2003 and 2002, respectively and is attributable to our cost for themanufacturing supplies sold to our Asian licensee for the production of Befar in China. Our Asian licensee had a sufficient inventory of the manufacturingsupplies during 2003.Research and Development Expenses. Our research and development expenses for 2003 and 2002 were $8,439,340 and $21,615,787, respectively.Research and development expenses attributable to Alprox-TD® and Femprox® for 2003 were $2,885,020 and $35,699, respectively with the balanceattributable to NexACT® technology based products and indirect overhead related to research and development, as compared to approximately $15,835,000and $642,000, respectively in 2002. The significant decrease was attributable to the completion of the costly Phase 3 trials for Alprox-TD® in December 2002and a significant reduction in expenses and non-essential personnel under our cash conservation program implemented in November 2002. The significantdecrease in research and development expenses was partially offset by an expense of $418,933 in 2003 for bonuses to be paid in 2004 to employees.Research and development expenses include all costs associated with our research and development agreements.General and Administrative Expenses. Our general and administrative expenses were $5,900,569 in 2003 as compared to $6,065,347 during 2002.The decrease was primarily attributable to the significant reduction in expenses and non-essential personnel under our cash conservation programimplemented in November 2002 which was offset by an expense of $655,467 in 2003 for bonuses to be paid in 2004 to employees of which approximately$400,000 was to be paid in the Company’s common stock. Other expense. Other expense was $152,867 in 2003 as compared to $81,008 in 2002. The increase was attributable to a loss on the disposition ofproperty and equipment of $114,542. In 2003, we sold some lab equipment that was no longer in use in order to generate some additional cash inflow.Interest Expense. We recognized $3,159,338 in interest expense during 2003 as compared to $384,286 during 2002. The significant increase ininterest expense was a result of an increase in interest expense charges from convertible notes, including the write-off of the discount attributable to theconversion of $5 million of our convertible notes into common stock in 2003, and increased borrowings under our GE Capital facility.Net Loss. The net loss was $17,233,566 for 2003, as compared to $27,641,519 for 2002. The significant decrease was primarily attributable to thecompletion of the two pivotal Phase 3 trials for Alprox-TD® in December 2002 and a significant reduction in expenses and non-essential personnel under ourcash conservation program implemented in November 2002.Net Loss applicable to Common Stock. The net loss applicable to common stock was $20,351,410 or $0.60 per share for 2003, as compared to$27,641,519 or $1.03 per share for 2002. The decrease in net loss applicable to common stock was primarily attributable to decreased spending resultingfrom the completion of the two pivotal Phase 3 trials for Alprox-TD® in December 2002 and a significant reduction in expenses and non-essential personnelunder our cash conservation program implemented in November 2002. The decrease in operating expenses was partially offset by the 2003 bonuses and thedeemed dividend related to the beneficial conversion feature of the preferred stock as discussed in Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements.17Quarterly ResultsThe following table sets forth selected unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004. The operatingresults are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 June 30, 2004 September 30,2004 December 31,2004 Total Revenues $104,199 $189,266 $63,457 $2,447 Loss from Operations ($3,890,187) ($4,045,544) ($4,632,220) ($4,736,887)Net Loss ($3,981,566) ($4,047,634) ($4,716,253) ($4,278,195)Basic & Diluted LossPer Share $(0.10)$(0.10)$(0.10)$(.09) March 31,2003 June 30, 2003 September 30,2003 December 31,2003 Total Revenues $1,713 $971 $64,552 $43,507 Loss from Operations ($3,088,667) ($3,413,698) ($2,848,266) ($4,878,535)Net Loss ($3,451,327) ($3,973,247) ($3,181,847) ($6,627,145)Basic & Diluted LossPer Share $(0.12)$(0.24)$(0.09)$(.20)ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.We do not hold derivative financial investments, derivative commodity investments, engage in foreign currency hedging or other transactions thatexpose us to material market risk. 18ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 20 Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2004 and 2003 22 Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003and 2002 23 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 24 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 25 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 26 Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 43 19 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of NexMed, Inc.:We have completed an integrated audit of NexMed, Inc.’s 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.Consolidated financial statements and financial statement scheduleIn our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position ofNexMed, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in theperiod ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion,the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read inconjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of theCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. Weconducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Thosestandards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingthe accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe thatour audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations, has limited capital resourcesand expects to incur future losses. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans inregard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might resultfrom the outcome of this uncertainty. 20Internal control over financial reportingAlso, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A,that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established in Internal Control -Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects,based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Company’s management isresponsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financialreporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whethereffective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includesobtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design andoperating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our auditprovides a reasonable basis for our opinions.A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal controlover financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairlyreflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permitpreparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are beingmade only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention ortimely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation ofeffectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliancewith the policies or procedures may deteriorate.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 15, 2005 21NexMed, Inc.Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, Assets 2004 2003 Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $7,747,285 $10,479,214 Marketable securities and short term investments 1,384,000 501,204 Note receivable — 48,341 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,399,514 1,482,426 Total current assets 10,530,799 12,511,185 Fixed assets, net 9,714,450 10,583,733 Debt issuance cost, net of accumulated amortization of $12,139 and $794 27,412 38,761 Total assets $20,272,661 $23,133,679 Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Current liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses $1,147,840 $773,522 Payroll related liabilities 277,660 1,273,303 Deferred revenue — 128,708 Capital lease obligations 644,050 898,861 Total current liabilities 2,069,550 3,074,394 Long term liabilities Convertible notes payable 6,000,000 6,000,000 Other long term liabilities 568,000 458,000 Capital lease obligations, net of current portion 233,826 877,877 Total liabilities 8,871,376 10,410,271 Commitments and contingincies (Note 12) Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding — — Common stock, $.001 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized, 51,687,046 and 40,123,127 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 51,688 40,124 Additional paid-in capital 113,604,968 97,924,314 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (10,188) (163)Deferred compensation — (19,332)Accumulated deficit (102,245,183) (85,221,535) Total stockholders' equity 11,401,285 12,723,408 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $20,272,661 $23,133,679 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.22NexMed, Inc.Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 2003 2002 Revenue Product sales and royalties $9,519 $6,206 $63,417 Research and development fees 349,850 104,537 84,611 Total revenue 359,369 110,743 148,028 Costs and expenses Cost of products sold — — 27,030 Research and development 10,684,477 8,439,340 21,615,787 General and administrative 6,979,730 5,900,569 6,065,347 Total costs and expenses 17,664,207 14,339,909 27,708,164 Loss from operations (17,304,838) (14,229,166) (27,560,136) Other income (expense) Other income (expense) 82,271 (152,867) (81,008)Interest income 85,000 75,574 141,266 Interest expense (425,128) (3,159,338) (384,286)Total other expense (257,857) (3,236,631) (324,028) Loss before benefit from income taxes (17,562,695) (17,465,797) (27,884,164) Benefit from income taxes 539,047 232,231 242,645 Net loss (17,023,648) (17,233,566) (27,641,519) Deemed dividend to preferred shareholders from beneficial conversion feature — (2,942,656) — Preferred dividend — (175,188) — Net loss applicable to common stock (17,023,648) (20,351,410) (27,641,519) Other comprehensive loss Foreign currency translation adjustments (13,671) 3,348 (223)Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities — (3,646) 2,562 Comprehensive loss $(17,037,319)$(17,233,864)$(27,639,180) Basic and diluted loss per share $(.39)$(.60)$(1.03) Weighted average common shares outstanding used for basic and diluted loss per share 43,603,546 33,649,774 26,937,200 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.23NexMed, Inc.Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity Accumulated other comprehensive income(loss) Foreign Unrealized Common Common Preferred Preferred Additional Currency loss on Total Stock Stock Stock Stock Paid-In Accumulated Deferred translation marketable Stockholders' (Shares) (Amount) (Shares) (Amount) Capital Deficit Compensation securities Equity Balance at January 1, 2002 25,541,934 25,542 — $0 $64,538,838 $(40,346,450)$ (6,704)$358 $ (103,719)$24,107,865 Issuance of common stock from private placement, net ofcommission paid 2,666,670 2,667 5,729,204 — — — — 5,731,871 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options 53,000 53 18,447 — — — — 18,500 Issuance of compensatory optionsand warrants toconsultants — — 71,840 — — — — 71,840 Issuance of common stock to Boardof Directors 32,115 32 56,468 — (15,000) — — 41,500 Issuance of common stock toemployees as bonus — — 104,392 — (78,294) — — 26,098 Issuance of warrants as debt issuancecost — — 66,861 — — — — 66,861 Discount on convertible note payable — — 795,701 — — — — 795,701 Amortization of deferredcompensation expense — — — — 2,436 — — 2,436 Unrealized loss from available-for-sale securities — — — — — — 2,562 2,562 Cumulative translation adjustment — — — — — (223) — (223)Net loss — — — (27,641,519) — — — (27,641,519) Balance at December 31, 2002 28,293,719 28,294 — — 71,381,751 (67,987,969) (97,562) 135 (101,157) 3,223,492 Issuance of common stock from private placement, net ofcommission paid 3,126,655 3,127 — — 10,246,854 — — — — 10,249,981 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options andwarrants 750,795 751 — — 916,011 — — — — 916,762 Issuance of compensatory optionsand warrants toconsultants — — 253,402 — — — — 253,402 Issuance of common stock to Boardof Directors 15,268 15 — — 54,988 — (35,000) — — 20,003 Stock based compensation toemployees 186,938 187 — — 15,832 — 78,294 — — 94,313 Issuance of preferred stock withdetachable warrants and beneficial conversion feature,net of issue costs — — 800 1 7,396,623 — — — — 7,397,424 Issuance of common stock uponconversion of preferred stock, includingdividends paid in stock 5,170,907 5,171 (800) (1) (5,171) — — — — (801)Discount on convertible notes,including beneficial conversion features and fair valueof detachable warrants — — — — 2,141,417 — — — — 2,141,417 Issuance of common stock uponconversion of convertible notes, includinginterest paid in stock 2,603,160 2,603 — — 5,641,970 — — — — 5,644,573 Stock surrendered by officer andretired in paymentof loan (24,315) (24) — — (119,363) — — — — (119,387)Realized loss on sale of securities — — — — — — — — 101,157 101,157 Amortization of deferredcompensation expense — — — — — — 34,936 — — 34,936 Unrealized loss from available-for-sale securities — — — — — — — — (3,646) (3,646)Cumulative translation adjustment — — — — — — — 3,348 — 3,348 Net loss — — — — — (17,233,566) — — — (17,233,566) Balance at December 31, 2003 40,123,127 40,124 — — 97,924,314 ($85,221,535) (19,332)$3,483 ($3,646) 12,723,408 Issuance of common stock from private placement, net ofcommission paid 11,011,978 11,012 — — 14,194,674 — — — — 14,205,686 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options andwarrants 200,482 200 — — 187,472 — — — — 187,672 Issuance of compensatory optionsand warrants toconsultants — — — — 330,215 — — — — 330,215 Issuance of common stock inpayment of interest onconvertible notes 130,673 131 — — 243,202 — — — — 243,333 Issuance of common stock toemployees as bonus 101,850 102 — — 544,427 — — — — 544,529 Issuance of common stock insettlement of lawsuit 118,936 119 — — 180,664 — — — — 180,783 Amortization of deferredcompensation expense — — — — — — 19,332 — — 19,332 Realized loss on sale of securities — — — — — — — 3,646 3,646 Cumulative translation adjustment — — — — — — — (13,671) — (13,671)Net loss — — — — — (17,023,648) — — — (17,023,648) Balance at December 31, 2004 51,687,046 51,688 — $0 $113,604,968 $ (102,245,183)$0 $ (10,188)$0 $11,401,285 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.24NexMed, Inc.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 2003 2002 Cash flows from operating activities Net loss $(17,023,648)$(17,233,566)$(27,641,519)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities Depreciation and amortization 996,043 1,250,667 882,854 Non-cash interest, amortization of debt discount and deferred financing costs 254,682 3,166,072 183,582 Non-cash compensation expense 1,074,859 408,636 141,874 Non-cash insurance expense (income) — 3,501 (2,155)Net loss on sale of marketable securities 8,421 94,824 142,291 Loss on disposal of property and equipment 18,982 114,542 — Decrease (increase) in prepaid expense and other assets 82,912 (1,109,109) 381,449 (Decrease) increase in deferred revenue (128,708) 128,708 — (Decrease) increase in payroll related liabilities (995,643) 918,311 354,992 Increase in other long term liabilities 110,000 108,000 350,000 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses 374,318 (3,395,927) 1,974,719 Net cash used in operating activities (15,227,782) (15,545,341) (23,231,913)Cash flows from investing activities Capital expenditures (145,809) (441,297) (4,698,900)Issuance of note receivable — — (309,575)Proceeds from collection of note receivable 48,341 198,348 62,886 Purchases of short term investments and marketable securities (1,897,584) (504,850) (3,610,747)Proceeds from sale/redemption of certificates of deposits, — marketable securities and short term investments 1,010,079 545,200 8,763,279 Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (984,973) (202,599) 206,943 Cash flows from financing activities Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs 14,205,686 10,869,392 5,744,371 Proceeds from exercise of stock options 187,672 297,349 6,000 Issuance of preferred stock, net of offering costs — 7,396,623 — Issuance of notes payable, net of debt issue costs — 7,510,445 4,696,399 Repayment of notes payable — (950,000) — Proceeds from capital lease financing for equipment — 738,731 1,111,427 Principal payments on capital lease obligations (898,861) (673,883) (411,658)Net cash provided by financing activities 13,494,497 25,188,657 11,146,539 Effect of foreign exchange on cash (13,671) 3,348 (223)Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (2,731,929) 9,444,065 (11,878,654)Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of year 10,479,214 1,035,149 12,913,803 End of year $7,747,285 $10,479,214 $1,035,149 Cash paid for interest $120,962 $142,850 $196,955 Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: Property and equipment acquired through capital lease obligations $— $738,731 $1,111,427 Conversion of debt to common stock — 5,600,000 — Payment of interest in common stock 243,333 275,448 — Conversion of preferred stock to common stock — 2,019,826 — Preferred stock dividend paid in common stock — 175,188 — Amortization of debt discount — 2,811,110 126,006 Deemed dividend to preferred shareholders — 2,942,656 — Deemed dividend to warrant holders — 120,717 — Repayment of officer loan in stock — 119,387 — The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.25NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1.Organization and Basis of Presentation The Company was incorporated in Nevada in 1987. In January 1994, the Company began research and development of a device for the treatment ofherpes simplex. The Company, since 1995, has conducted research and development both domestically and abroad on proprietary pharmaceuticalproducts, with the goal of growing through acquisition and development of pharmaceutical products and technology. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction ofliabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $102,245,183 at December 31, 2004 andexpects that it will incur additional losses in the future completing the research, development and commercialization of its technologies. Thesecircumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management anticipates that it will requireadditional financing, which it is actively pursuing, to fund operations, including continued research, development and clinical trials of the Company’sproduct candidates. Although management continues to pursue these plans, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtainingfinancing on terms acceptable to the Company. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing, operations will need to be discontinued. Thefinancial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 2.Summary of Significant Accounting Principles Significant accounting principles followed by the Company in preparing its financial statements are as follows: Principles of consolidationThe consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accountsand transactions have been eliminated. ReclassificationsReclassifications of certain amounts for prior years have been recorded to conform to the current year presentation.Translation of foreign currenciesThe functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiary located in Hong Kong is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of the Company’sforeign subsidiaries are translated to United States dollars based on exchange rates at the end of the reporting period. Income and expense items aretranslated at average exchange rates prevailing during the reporting period. Translation adjustments are accumulated in a separate component ofstockholder’s equity. Transaction gains or losses are included in the determination of operating results. Cash and cash equivalentsFor purposes of the balance sheets and the statements of cash flows, cash equivalents represent all highly liquid investments with an original maturitydate of three months or less. Marketable securities and short term investmentsMarketable securities consist of high quality corporate and government securities, which have original maturities of more than three months, at thedate of purchase, and equity investments in publicly-traded companies. The Company classifies all debt securities and equity securities with readilydeterminable market value as “available for sale” in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and EquitySecurities.” These investments are carried at fair market value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders’equity. Gross unrealized losses were none and $3,646 for 2004 and 2003, respectively. All unrealized losses were less than 12 months in nature. Grossrealized gains from the sales of securities classified as available for sale were none, $17,016, and $143,971 and gross realized losses were $8,421,$111,840, and $1,680 for 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively. For the purpose of determining realized gains and losses, the cost of securities sold wasbased on specific identification. The Company reviews investments on a quarterly basis for reductions in market value that are other than temporary.When such reductions occur, the cost of the investment is adjusted to its fair value through a charge to other income (expense) in the periods incurred. 26NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements A significant amount of our short term investments are comprised of investment grade variable rate debt obligations, which are asset-backed andcategorized as available-for-sale. Accordingly, our investments in these securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value due to theirvariable interest rates, which typically reset every 28 days. Despite the long-term nature of their contractual maturities, we have the ability and intentliquidate these securities within one year. As a result of the resetting variable rates, we had no cumulative gross unrealized or realized holding gains orlosses from these investments. All income generated from these investments was recorded as interest income. Fair value of financial instrumentsThe carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, convertible notes payable and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates fair value due tothe relatively short maturity of these instruments. Fixed assetsProperty and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of equipment and furniture and fixtures is provided on astraight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally three to ten years. Depreciation of buildings is provided on a straight-linebasis over the estimated useful life of 31 years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is provided on a straight-line basis over the shorter of theirestimated useful life or the lease term. The costs of additions and betterments are capitalized, and repairs and maintenance costs are charged tooperations in the periods incurred. Long-lived assetsThe Company reviews for the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may notbe recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assetand its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount. If such assets are considered impaired, the amount of the impairment loss recognized ismeasured as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, fair value being determined based upon discountedcash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset. No such impairment losses have been recorded by the Company during 2004,2003 or 2002. Revenue recognitionRevenues from product sales are recognized upon delivery of products to customers, less allowances for estimated returns and discounts. Royaltyrevenue is recognized upon the sale of the related products, provided the royalty amounts are fixed or determinable and the amounts are consideredcollectible. 27NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Revenues earned under research and development contracts are recognized in accordance with the cost-to-cost method outlined in Staff AccountingBulletin No. 101, as amended, whereby the extent of progress toward completion is measured on the cost-to-cost basis; however, revenue recognized atany point will not exceed the cash received. When the current estimates of total contract revenue and contract cost indicate a loss, a provision for theentire loss on the contract is made in the period which it becomes probable. All costs related to these agreements are expensed as incurred andclassified within “Research and development” expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income. Research and developmentResearch and development costs are expensed as incurred and include the cost of salaries, building costs, utilities, allocation of indirect costs, andexpenses to third parties who conduct research and development, pursuant to development and consulting agreements, on behalf of the Company. Income taxesIncome taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income taxes are recorded for temporary differences between financialstatement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the tax rates expected to be in effect forthe years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferredtax assets will not be realized. Loss per common shareBasic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common sharesoutstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Thecomputation of diluted earnings per share does not assume conversion, exercise or contingent exercise of securities that would have an antidilutiveeffect on per share amounts. At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, outstanding options to purchase 5,215,081, 5,414,617, and 4,750,755 shares of common stock, respectively,with exercise prices ranging from $.55 to $16.25 have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as they are antidilutive.Outstanding warrants to purchase 11,436,691, 7,272,261, and 2,044,908 shares of common stock, respectively, with exercise prices ranging from $1.00to $4.04 have also been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as they are antidilutive. Promissory notes convertible into 1,200,000and 923,077 shares of common stock (see Note 5) in 2004 and 2003 respectively have also been excluded from the computation of diluted loss pershare, as they are antidilutive. Accounting for stock based compensationAs provided by SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”) as amended by SFAS 148, the Company has elected to continueto account for its stock-based compensation programs according to the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting forStock Issued to Employees.” Accordingly, compensation expense has been recognized to the extent of employee or director services rendered based onthe intrinsic value of compensatory options or shares granted under the plans. The Company has adopted the disclosure provisions required by SFAS123. 28NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Had the Company's stock-based compensation been determined by the fair-value based method of SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-BasedCompensation," the Company's net loss and loss per share would have been as follows: For the year ended 2004 2003 2002 Net loss applicable to common stock, as reported $(17,023,648)$(20,351,410)$(27,641,519)Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net loss 355,800 408,636 141,874 Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair-value based method for all awards (1,672,545) (2,211,685) (2,591,717)Proforma net loss applicable to common stock $(18,340,393)$(22,154,459)$(30,091,362) Basic and diluted loss per share: As reported $(0.39)$(0.60)$(1.03)Proforma $(0.42)$(0.66)$(1.12) Additional disclosures required under SFAS 123 are presented in Note 7. Concentration of credit riskFrom time to time, the Company maintains cash in bank accounts that exceed the FDIC insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losseson its cash accounts. Comprehensive lossWe have recorded comprehensive loss in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 130, “Reporting ComprehensiveIncome” (“SFAS 130”), which requires the presentation of the components of comprehensive loss in the Company’s financial statements.Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in the Company’s equity during a financial reporting period from transactions and other circumstancesfrom non-owner sources (including cumulative translation adjustments and unrealized gains/losses on available for sale securities). Accumulated othercomprehensive (loss) income included in the Company’s balance sheet is comprised of translation adjustments from the Company’s foreignsubsidiaries and unrealized gains and losses on investment in marketable securities. Accounting estimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to makeestimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues andexpenses during the reporting period. The Company’s most significant estimates relate to the valuation of its long-lived assets, estimated cost tocomplete under its research contracts, and valuation allowances for its deferred tax benefit. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Recent accounting pronouncementsIn December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.123(R),Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123(R) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments forgoods and services. Under SFAS 123(R), companies will no longer be able to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsicmethod in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Instead, companies willbe required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and to recognize compensation expense over the period during which anemployee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. The provisions of SFAS 123(R) are effective for periods beginning after June 15,2005, and apply to all awards that vest after the required effective date and to awards that are granted, modified, repurchased, or cancelled after thatdate. For an approximate impact on 2005 results please refer to the pro forma information above in the Accounting for Stock Based CompensationNote. 29NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 03-6, “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No.128”. This statement provides additional guidance on the calculation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share. The FASB concluded inEITF 03-6 that companies with multiple classes of common stock or participating securities, as defined by SFAS No. 128, should calculate anddisclose earnings per share based on the two-class method. The adoption of this statement does not have an impact to the Company’s financialstatement presentation as the Company is currently in a loss position. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 46 "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN46"). Variable Interest Entities ("VIEs") are entities where control is achieved through means other than voting rights. FIN 46 provides guidance on theidentification of and financial reporting for VIEs. A VIE is required to be consolidated if the company is subject to the majority of the risk of loss fromthe VIE's activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns, or both. Certain provisions of FIN 46 were effective during 2003;however generally FIN 46 must be applied to the first reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption of this Interpretation does not haveany impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 3.Research and Development Agreements In November 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with a Japanese pharmaceutical company whereby NexMed would provide contractdevelopment services for an innovative topical treatment for a form of herpes. The Company received $100,000 as a signing payment in 2003,approximately $87,000 of which the Company recognized as revenue in 2004 and approximately $13,000 of which it recognized as revenue in 2003.In 2004, the Company recognized revenueof approximately $217,000 and incurred expenses of approximately $116,000 related to this agreement.The $217,000 of revenue consisted of the $87,000 deferred from 2003 and $130,000 in milestone payments received in 2004. In September of 2004,the Company completed all development work for this project and will recognize no further revenue. In November 2003, the Company entered into an R&D agreement with a Japanese pharmaceutical company to develop a new local anesthetics geldesigned for pain relief associated with dental procedures, superficial skin surgery and skin graft harvesting, and needle insertions. The Companyrecognized revenue of approximately $41,000 in 2004 and $5,000 in 2003 related to this project. In 2004, the Company incurred expenses ofapproximately $32,000, completed all development work and will recognize no further revenue related to this project. 30NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements In October 2003, the Company entered into an R&D agreement with a Japanese pharmaceutical company to develop a tape/patch treatment for chronicpain. The Company recognized revenue of approximately $21,000 in 2003. The second milestone payment of approximately $69,000 was receivedand recognized as research and development fee revenue in 2004. In 2004, the Company incurred expenses of approximately $40,500 related to thisagreement and completed the first phase of development. Upon completion of the first phase of development, the development partner decided tosuspend all remaining development work on this project due to new regulatory developments in Japan. As such, there will be no additional revenuefrom the Japanese pharmaceutical company should the Company continue to develop this product further. In August 2003, the Company entered into an R&D agreement with a Japanese pharmaceutical company to develop NM 20138, a new once-a-daypatch treatment for bronchial asthma, which incorporates an off-patent anti-asthmatic drug compound and the NexACT® technology. The Companyrecognized revenue related to this project of approximately $21,000 in 2003. The second milestone payment of approximately $23,000 was receivedand recognized as research and development fee revenue in 2004. In 2004, the Company incurred expenses of approximately $62,000 related to thisagreement and completed the first phase of development. Upon completion of the first phase of development, the partner elected not to take the projectto the next stage of development due to proprietary reasons. As such, there will be no additional revenue from the Japanese pharmaceutical companyshould the Company continue to develop this product further. The Company negotiated and received a one-time payment of $90,538 uponcancellation of this agreement, which amount is recorded in other income (expense) in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations. 4.Fixed Assets Fixed assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were comprised of the following: 2004 2003 Land 363,909 363,909 Building 7,457,791 7,210,118 Machinery and equipment 993,385 1,191,707 Capital lease - Equipment 2,861,335 2,881,220 Computer software 565,158 565,158 Furniture and fixtures 342,724 343,971 Leasehold improvements 637,907 637,907 13,222,209 13,193,990 Less: accumulated depreciation (3,507,759) (2,610,257) $9,714,450 $10,583,733 Depreciation and amortization expense was $996,043, $1,250,667, and $882,855 for 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively, of which $410,833, $424,778and $268,716 related to capital leases for the respective years. Accumulated amortization of assets under capital leases was $1,207,027 and $796,144at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. 31NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 5.Convertible Notes Payable On December 12, 2003, the Company issued convertible notes (the “Notes”) in an aggregate principal amount of $6 million. The Notes are payable onMay 31, 2007 and are collateralized by the Company’s manufacturing facility in East Windsor, New Jersey which has a carrying value ofapproximately $6.9 million. The Notes were initially convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price initially equal to$6.50 per share (923,077 shares). Pursuant to the terms of the Notes, the conversion price was adjusted on June 14, 2004 to the volume weightedaverage price of the Company’s stock over the six-month period ending on such date Since the volume weighted average price of the Company’s stockduring this period was below $5.00, the conversion price was adjusted to $5.00 (1,200,000 shares). Interest accretes on the Notes on a semi-annualbasis at a rate of 5% per annum, and the Company may pay such amounts in cash or by effecting the automatic conversion of such amount into theCompany’s common stock at a 5% premium to the then average market prices. In April and October 2004, respectively, the Company issued 32,913 shares and 97,760 shares of its common stock as payment of an aggregate of$243,333 in interest on the Notes. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded amortization of the debt discount of none and $2,811,110, respectively andamortization of debt issuance costs of $11,349 and $82,807, respectively. 6.Line of Credit In February 2001, the Company entered into a financial arrangement with GE Capital Corporation for a line of credit, which provided for the financingof up to $5 million of equipment (i) for its new East Windsor, NJ manufacturing facility and (ii) for its expanded corporate and laboratory facilities inRobbinsville, NJ. Equipment financed through this facility was in the form of a 42-month capital lease. As of December 31, 2002, the Company hadfinanced $1,113,459 of equipment purchases under the GE credit line. The $5 million credit line expired in March 2002, and as of December 31, 2004,there was an outstanding balance due GE of $57,832 under this facility. This balance is payable in monthly installments through various dates in2005. In January 2002, GE approved a new credit line, which provided for the financing of up to $3 million of equipment and expired on December 31,2002. During 2002, the Company accessed $1,111,427 of the credit line. As of December 31, 2004, there was an outstanding balance due GE of$375,571 under the January 2002 facility. Balances due are payable in 42 monthly installments from date of take-down. In July 2003, GE approved a new credit line, which expired on July 2004 and provided for the financing of up to $1.85 million of equipment. During2003 and 2004, the Company accessed $738,731 of this credit line. As of December 31, 2004, there was an outstanding balance due GE of $444,473under the July 2003 facility, payable in 36 monthly installments from the date of take-down. 32NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7.Stock Options During October 1996 the Company adopted a Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (“Stock Option Plan”) and reserved 100,000 shares of common stockfor issuance pursuant to the Plan. During December 1996, the Company also adopted The NexMed, Inc. Stock Option and Long-Term IncentiveCompensation Plan (“the Incentive Plan”) and The NexMed, Inc. Recognition and Retention Stock Incentive Plan (“the Recognition Plan”). A total of2,000,000 shares were set aside for these two plans. In May 2000, the Stockholders’ approved an increase in the number of shares reserved for theIncentive Plan and Recognition Plan to a total of 7,500,000. Options granted under the Company’s plans generally vest over a period of one to fiveyears, with exercise prices of currently outstanding options ranging between $0.55 to $16.25. The maximum term under these plans is 10 years. A summary of stock option activity is as follows: Weighted Average Number of Exercise Shares Price Outstanding at December 31, 2001 3,834,575 $3.72 Granted 1,555,573 1.35 Exercised (53,000) 0.35 Cancelled (586,393) 4.04 Outstanding at December 31, 2002 4,750,755 $2.92 Granted 1,110,350 2.80 Exercised (326,074) 0.88 Cancelled (120,414) 6.37 Outstanding at December 31, 2003 5,414,617 $2.94 Granted 731,150 2.41 Exercised (192,986) 0.90 Cancelled (737,700) 3.22 Outstanding at December 31, 2004 5,215,081 $2.91 Exercisable at December 31, 2004 3,975,628 $2.93 Exercisable at December 31, 2003 4,269,617 $2.92 Exercisable at December 31, 2002 3,162,900 $3.46 Options available for grant at December 31, 2004 1,167,973 33NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at December 31, 2004: Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Weighted Average Range of Number Remaining Weighted Average Number Weighted Average Exercise Prices Outstanding Contractual Life Exercise Price Exercisable Exercise Price $ .55 - 1.85 1,458,531 7.74 years $1.12 944,378 $0.88 2.00 - 3.99 2,030,650 3.50 years 2.52 1,561,100 2.31 4.00 - 5.50 1,614,000 5.86 years 4.21 1,358,250 4.09 7.00 - 8.00 15,000 5.40 years 8.00 15,000 8.00 12.00 - 16.25 96,900 5.83 years 15.79 96,900 15.79 5,215,081 $2.91 3,975,628 $2.93 The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $2.46, $2.60 and $1.23, respectively. The fair value of each option and warrant (note 10) is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The followingassumptions were used in the model: 2004 2003 2002 Dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Risk-free yields 1.35% - 4.58% 1.35% - 4.58% 1.35% - 3.00% Expected volatility 100% 100% 100% Expected option life 1 - 10 years 1 - 10 years 1 - 10 years 8.Common Stock Pursuant to a Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated December 17, 2004, the Company closed a private placement of its securities andraised over $7 million in gross proceeds. The Company sold 5,495,310 shares of its common stock at $1.28 per share. The investors also received five-year warrants to purchase 2,198,126 shares of common stock, exercisable beginning six months after closing at a price of $1.47 per share. In addition,the investors also received one-year warrants to purchase 549,536 shares of common stock, exercisable at a price of $2.00 per share. In June 2004, the Company raised over $8.27 million in gross proceeds from a private placement of its securities. The Company sold 5,516,668 sharesof its common stock at $1.50 per share. The investors also received five-year warrants to purchase 1,930,834 shares of common stock, exercisablebeginning six months after closing, at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. 34NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements On July 2, 2003, the Company closed a private placement of its common stock at $3.60 per share and issued a total of 2,916,669 shares and 1,020,832four-year warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at $5.04 per share. One third of the warrants are callable by the company if themarket price of the Company’s common stock closes above $10.00 for seven consecutive trading days. The Company received $10.5 million in grossproceeds. On March 21, 2003, the Company closed a private placement of its common stock at $1.50 per share. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company issued atotal of 210,000 shares and 157,500 three-year warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $2.00 per share and received $315,000 in grossproceeds. 9.Stockholder Rights Plan On April 3, 2000, the Company declared a dividend distribution of one preferred share purchase right (the "Right") for each outstanding share of theCompany's common stock to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 21, 2000. One Right will also be distributed for each share ofCommon Stock issued after April 21, 2000, until the Distribution Date described in the next paragraph. Each Right entitles the registered holder topurchase from the Company a unit consisting of one one-hundredths of a share (a "Unit") of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $.001 parvalue per share (the "Preferred Stock"), at a Purchase Price of $100.00 per Unit, subject to adjustment. 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s preferredstock have been set-aside for the Rights Plan. Initially, the Rights will be attached to all Common Stock certificates representing shares then outstanding, and no separate Rights Certificates will bedistributed. The Rights will separate from the Common Stock and a Distribution Date will occur upon the earlier of (i) ten (10) business days followinga public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (an "Acquiring Person") has acquired, or obtained the right to acquire,beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (the "Stock Acquisition Date"), or (ii) ten (10) business daysfollowing the public announcement of a tender offer or exchange offer that would, if consummated, result in a person or group beneficially owning15% or more of such outstanding shares of Common Stock, subject to certain limitations. Under the terms of the Rights Agreement, Dr. Y. Joseph Mo, who beneficially owned approximately 12.12% of the outstanding shares of theCompany's Common Stock as of April 2000, will be permitted to continue to own such shares and to increase such ownership to up to 25% of theoutstanding shares of Common Stock, without becoming an Acquiring Person and triggering a Distribution Date. 35NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 10.Warrants A summary of warrant activity is as follows: Weighted Common Shares Average Issuable upon Exercise Exercise Price Outstanding at January 1, 2002 2,206,549 $11.59 Issued 1,183,850 3.27 Redeemed (1,345,491) 14.31 Outstanding at December 31, 2002 2,044,908 5.03 Issued 5,959,990 2.10 Redeemed (424,811) 3.96 Cancelled (307,826) 14.37 Outstanding at December 31, 2003 7,272,261 2.32 Issued 5,128,496 1.86 Redeemed (7,500) 1.94 Cancelled (956,566) 3.67 Outstanding at December 31, 2004 11,436,691 $1.91 11.Income Taxes The Company has incurred losses since inception, which have generated net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $65.1 million for federaland state income tax purposes. These carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income and expire beginning in 2014 through 2024 forfederal income tax purposes. In addition, the Company has general business and research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately$1.8 million. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 places a limitation on the utilization of Federal net operating loss carryforwards when an ownershipchange, as defined by tax law, occurs. Generally, an ownership change, as defined, occurs when a greater than 50 percent change in ownership takesplace during any three-year period. The actual utilization of net operating loss carryforwards generated prior to such changes in ownership will belimited, in any one year, to a percentage of fair market value of the Company at the time of the ownership change. Such a change may have alreadyresulted from the additional equity financing obtained by the Company since its formation. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company was approved by the State of New Jersey to sell a portion of its state tax credits pursuant to the Technology TaxCertificate Transfer Program. The Company has approximately $4.6 million in NJ tax credits, and was approved to sell $605,671 in 2004, $261,000 in2003 and $279,000 in 2002. The Company received net proceeds of $539,047, $232,231, and $242,645 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, as aresult of the sale of the tax credits. The net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards resulted in a noncurrent deferred tax benefit at December 31, 2004 and 2003 ofapproximately $28.5 million and $23.1 million, respectively. In consideration of the Company’s accumulated losses and the uncertainty of its abilityto utilize this deferred tax benefit in the future, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of an equal amount on such date to fully offset thedeferred tax benefit amount. 36NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The reconciliation of income taxes computed using the statutory U.S. income tax rate and the provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years endedDecember 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows: For the years endedDecember 31, 2004 2003 2002 Federal statutory tax rate (35%) (35%) (35%) State taxes, net of federal benefit (6%) (6%) (6%) Valuation allowance (41%) (41%) (41%) Sale of state net operating losses (3.16%) (1.33%) (0.87%) Provision (benefit) for income taxes (3.16%) (1.33%) (0.87%) For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company’s effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate principally due to netoperating losses and other temporary differences for which no benefit was recorded, state taxes and other permanent differences. Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, certain substantial changes in the Company’s ownership may result in a limitation on the amountof net operating loss carryforwards. 12.Commitments and Contingencies The Company is a party to clinical research agreements totaling approximately $12.8 million. These agreements provide that upon cancellation, theCompany will owe 10% of the outstanding contract amount at the time of cancellation. At December 31, 2004, this amounts to approximately$1,100,000. The Company anticipates that the clinical research in connection with the agreements will be completed in 2006. The Company is a party to several short-term consulting and research agreements that, generally, can be cancelled at will by either party. A lawsuit was filed with the Superior court of New Jersey on April 1, 2003 by one former employee against the Company for an unspecified bonusamount that he believes he should have received upon completion of the construction of the Company's East Windsor manufacturing facility. TheCompany has engaged counsel to defend its position and intends to defend itself vigorously against the above-mentioned claim and believes it hasvalid defenses; however, the case is still in the preliminary stages and the likely outcomes cannot be predicted, nor can a reasonable estimate of theamount of loss, if any, be made. 37NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The Company leases office space and research facilities under operating lease agreements expiring through 2006. The Company also leases equipmentfrom GE Capital under capital leases expiring through 2006 (Note 7). Future minimum payments under noncancellable operating and capital leaseswith initial or remaining terms of one year or more, consist of the following at December 31, 2004: Operating Capital 2005 469,378 690,816 2006 100,823 241,099 2007 2,100 — Total minimum lease payments $572,301 931,915 Less: amount representing interest (54,039)Present value of future minimum lease payments 877,876 Less: current portion (644,050) Capital lease obligations, net of current portion $233,826 The Company also leases office space under short-term lease agreements. Total rent expense was $484,053, $460,643, and $452,052 in 2004, 2003,and 2002 respectively. On February 27, 2002, the Company entered in to an employment agreement with Y. Joseph Mo, Ph.D., that has a constant term of five years, andpursuant to which Dr. Mo will serve as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and President. During his employment with the Company, Dr. Mo willreceive an annual base salary of at least $250,000 (to be raised to $350,000 after the Company sustains gross revenues of $10 million for twoconsecutive fiscal quarters), subject to annual cost of living increases. Under the employment agreement, Dr. Mo is entitled to deferred compensationin an annual amount equal to one sixth of the sum of his base salary and bonus for the 36 calendar months preceding the date on which the deferredcompensation payments commence subject to certain limitations, including annual vesting through January 1, 2007, as set forth in the employmentagreement. The deferred compensation will be payable monthly for 180 months commencing on termination of employment. As of December 31, 2004and 2003, the Company has accrued approximately $568,000 and $458,000 respectively, which is included in other long-term liabilities, based uponthe estimated present value of the vested portion of the obligation.38NexMed, Inc.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 13.Segment and Geographic Information The Company is active in one business segment: designing, developing, manufacturing and marketing pharmaceutical products. The Companymaintains development and business development operations in the United States and Hong Kong. Geographic information as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows: For the years ended December 31, 2004 2003 2002 Net revenues United States $216,891 $12,718 $— Hong Kong 142,478 98,025 148,028 $359,369 $110,743 $148,028 December 31, 2004 2003 2002 Long-lived assets United States $9,714,450 $10,583,733 $11,507,564 Hong Kong — — — $9,714,450 $10,583,733 $11,507,564 39 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH AUDITORS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURENone.ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURESDisclosure Controls and Procedures and Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, the Company’s management carried out an evaluation with participation of theCompany’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, of theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of December 31, 2004 that the Company’s disclosure control and procedures are effective. Therewere no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation by the Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer that occurred during the Company’s fourth quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.Our Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined inExchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principalfinancial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control -Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under such framework,our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004.Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited byPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.None.40PART III.ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.Other than as set forth below, information called for by Item 10 is set forth under the heading “Election of Directors” and “Committees of the Board”in our 2005 Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference, and “Executive Officers of the Registrant” of Part I of this Report.The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and to all of its other officers,directors and employees. The code of ethics is available at the Corporate Governance section of the Investor’s Info. page on the Company’s website athttp://www.nexmed.com. The Company intends to disclose future amendments to, or waivers from, certain provisions of its code of ethics, if any, on theabove website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.Information called for by Item 11 is set forth under the heading “Executive Compensation” in our 2005 Proxy Statement, which is incorporatedherein by reference. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.Other than as set forth below, information called for by Item 12 is set forth under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners andManagement” in our 2005 Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONThe following table gives information as of December 31, 2004, about shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options,warrants and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans (together, the "Equity Plans"): (a)(b)(c)Plan categoryNumber of securities to be issuedupon exercise of outstandingoptions, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise priceof outstanding options, warrantsand rightsNumber of securities remaining available for futureissuance under equity compensation plans (excludingsecurities reflected in column (a))Equity compensation plansapproved by security holders5,215,081 (1)$2.911,167,973 (2)Equity compensation plans notapproved by security holders------Total5,215,081 1,167,973(1) Consists of options outstanding at December 31, 2004 under The NexMed Inc. Stock Option and Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") and TheNexMed Inc. Recognition and Retention Stock Incentive Plan (the "Recognition Plan").(2) Consists of 885,173 and 282,800 shares of common stock that remain available for future issuance, at December 31, 2004, under the Incentive Plan andRecognition Plan, respectively.41ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.Information called for by Item 13 is set forth under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in our 2005 Proxy Statement,which is incorporated herein by reference.ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.Information called for by item 14 is set forth under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in our 2005 Proxy Statement, which isincorporated herein by reference. PART IV. ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a) 1. Financial Statements:The information required by this item is included in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.2. Financial Statement Schedules Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. 42SCHEDULE IINEXMED, INC.SCHEDULE OF VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS Description Balance atBeginningof Year Charged toCosts andExpenses Charged toOtherAccounts Deductions Balance atEnd of Year Year ended December 31, 2004Valuation allowance - deferred tax asset $23,098,077 $5,422,293 -- -- $ 28,520,370 Year ended December 31, 2003Valuation allowance - deferred tax asset $17,901,534 $5,196,543 -- -- $23,098,077 Year ended December 31, 2002Valuation allowance - deferred tax asset $8,699,708 $9,201,826 -- -- $ 17,901,534 All other schedules have been omitted because the information is not applicable or is presented in the Financial Statements or Notesthereto. 3. Exhibits EXHIBITSNO.DESCRIPTION3.1Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed with the Company'sForm 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 1997). 3.2Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2003). 43 3.3Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company, dated June 22, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit3.2 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003). 4.1Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Company's Form 10-SB filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 1997). 4.2Rights Agreement and form of Rights Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filedwith the Commission on April 10, 2000). 4.3Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to our CurrentReport on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 10, 2000). 4.4Certificate of Designation of the Company's Series B 8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference toExhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2003). 4.5Form of Warrant dated April 21, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2003). 4.6Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated July 2, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’sRegistration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2003). 4.7Form of Warrant dated June 18, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on June 25, 2004). 10.1*Amended and Restated NexMed, Inc. Stock Option and Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit10.1 filed with the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2001). 10.2*The NexMed, Inc. Recognition and Retention Stock Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with the Company'sForm 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 28, 2004). 10.3*Form of Agreement dated November 15, 1995 between NexMed, Inc. and each of Y. Joseph Mo, Ph.D., Vivian H. Liu and Gilbert S.Banker, Ph.D, which are collectively commonly referred to by NexMed, Inc. as the Non-Qualified Performance Incentive Program (filed asExhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 1999,including any amendment or report filed for the purpose of updating such information, and incorporated herein by reference). 10.4 License Agreement dated March 22, 1999 between NexMed International Limited and Vergemont International Limited (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2000). 10.5*The NexMed, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.6 filed with the Company's Form 10-SB/Afiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 1997). 44 10.6*Employment Agreement dated February 26, 2002 by and between NexMed, Inc. and Dr. Y. Joseph Mo (incorporated by reference toExhibit 10.7 of the Company's Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2002 ). 10.7Letter Agreement dated February 6, 2001, by and among NexMed, Inc. and General Electric Capital Corporation (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2002). 10.8Letter Agreement dated January 2, 2002, by and among NexMed, Inc. and General Electric Capital Corporation (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2002). 10.9Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and The Tailwind Fund Ltd. and Solomon Strategic Holdings, Inc. dated June 11,2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on August 14, 2002). 10.10Mortgage, Security Agreement and Assignment of Leases and Rents by NexMed (U.S.A.), Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of theCompany, in favor of The Tailwind Fund Ltd. and Solomon Strategic Holdings, Inc. dated June 11, 2002 (incorporated herein byreference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002). 10.11Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2003, between the Company and the Purchasers identified onSchedule 1 to the Purchase Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2003). 10.12Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2003, between the Company and the Purchasers identified on Schedule 1 to the InvestorRights Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on May 14, 2003). 10.13Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2003, between the Company and the Purchasers identified onSchedule 1 to the Purchase Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement onForm S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2003). 10.14Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of July 2, 2003, between the Company and the Purchasers identified on Schedule 1 to the InvestorRights Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2003). 10.15Letter Agreement dated July 12, 2003, between NexMed, Inc. and General Electric Capital Corporation (incorporated herein by referenceto Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2003). 10.16*Employment Agreement dated September 26, 2003 by and between NexMed, Inc. and James L. Yeager (incorporated herein by referenceto Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2003). 10.17*Employment Agreement dated September 26, 2003 by and between NexMed, Inc. and Kenneth F. Anderson (incorporated herein byreference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2003). 45 10.18*Employment Agreement dated September 26, 2003 by and between NexMed, Inc. and Vivian H. Liu (incorporated herein by reference toExhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2003). 10.19*Amendment dated September 26, 2003 to Employment Agreement by and between Dr. Y. Joseph Mo and NexMed, Inc. dated February26, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on November 12, 2003). 10.20Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2003, between the Company and the Purchasers named therein (incorporated herein byreference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onJanuary 13, 2004). 10.21Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2003, between the Company and the Purchasers named therein (incorporatedherein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on January 13, 2004). 10.22Form of 5% Convertible Note due May 31, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s RegistrationStatement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2004). 10.23First Amendment of Mortgage, Security Agreement and Assignment of Leases and Rents by NexMed (U.S.A.), Inc., in favor of The TailWind Fund Ltd. and Solomon Strategic Holdings, Inc., dated as of December 12, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2004). 10.24Subsidiary Guaranty by NexMed (U.S.A.), Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, in favor of The Tailwind Fund Ltd. andSolomon Strategic Holdings, Inc. dated December 12, 2003. 10.25Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2004, between NexMed, Inc. and the Purchases set forth onSchedule 1 thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on June 25, 2004). 10.26Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2004, between the Company and the Purchasers identified on Schedule 1 thereto(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 25,2004). 10.27License, Supply and Distribution Agreement between the Company and Schering AG, Germany, dated July 1, 2004 (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2004). 10.28*Stock Option Grant Agreement between the Company and Leonard A. Oppenheim dated November 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference toExhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2004). 10.29*Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement between the Company and its Directors. 21Subsidiaries. 23Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. 46 31.1Chief Executive Officer's Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2Chief Financial Officer's Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1Chief Executive Officer's Certificate, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002. 32.2Chief Financial Officer's Certificate, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002. *Management compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(c) of Form 10-K. 47SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to besigned on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. NEXMED, INC. Date: March 16, 2005By: /s/ Y. Joseph Mo Y. Joseph Mo Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of theregistrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. SIGNATURE TITLE DATE /s/ Y. Joseph Mo Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer March 16, 2005Y. JOSEPH MO /s/ Vivian H. Liu Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary March 16, 2005VIVIAN H. LIU /s/ Mark Westgate Controller and principal accounting officer March 16, 2005MARK WESTGATE /s/ Richard J. Berman Director March 16, 2005RICHARD J. BERMAN /s/ Arthur D. Emil Director March 16, 2005ARTHUR D. EMIL /s/ Sami A. Hashim Director March 16, 2005SAMI A. HASHIM /s/ Leonard A. Oppenheim Director March 16, 2005LEONARD A. OPPENHEIM /s/ Martin Wade III Director March 16, 2005MARTIN WADE III 48EXHIBIT INDEX EXHIBITS NO.DESCRIPTION10.29Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement between the Company and its Directors 21Subsidiaries. 23Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. 31.1Chief Executive Officer's Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2Chief Financial Officer's Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1Chief Executive Officer's Certificate, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002. 32.2Chief Financial Officer's Certificate, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002. NEXMED, INC.AGREEMENT EVIDENCING THE GRANT OF ANON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION UNDER THENEXMED, INC. RECOGNITION AND RETENTIONSTOCK INCENTIVE PLAN TO _______________Agreement (this "Agreement") effective as of November 1, 2004 (the "Grant Date"), between NexMed, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the"Company"), and _________ ("Grantee").1. Grant of Option. Pursuant to the NexMed, Inc. Recognition and Retention Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), the Company herebygrants to Grantee, as of the Grant Date, a non-qualified stock option (the "Option"), to purchase an aggregate of ______ shares (the "Option Shares") ofCommon Stock of the Company (the "Common Stock") at a price of $_____ per share subject to adjustment and the other terms and conditions set forthherein and in the Plan.2. Grantee Bound by Plan. Enclosed is a copy of the Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. The Plan shallgovern all aspects of this Agreement except as otherwise specifically stated herein. Grantee hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees tobe bound by all the terms and provisions thereof. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaningsascribed to them in the Plan. The Plan should be carefully examined before any decision is made to exercise this Option.3. Exercise of Option. (a) Vesting. Subject to the earlier termination of the Option as provided herein and in the Plan, the Option may beexercised, by written notice to the Company at any time and from time to time after the Grant Date, but, except as otherwise provided below, such Optionshall not be exercisable for more than the number of Option Shares which are then vested. This Option shall vest in _______ installments as follows:(i) ___% of the Stock Option Shares (which represents _______ Stock Option Shares) shall vest immediately;(ii) ___% of the Stock Option Shares (which represents _______ Stock Option Shares) shall vest on the date of the____ Annual Meeting of Shareholders.(b) Early Expiration of Option. (i) Upon the termination of the Grantee's service with the Company (including any subsidiarythereof) for any reason, including death, any portion of the Option granted hereunder that is not vested and exercisable on the date of such termination shallautomatically expire and be forfeited as of such date and the vested portion of the Option shall expire in accordance with subsections (ii) and (iii) of Section3(b), or, in the event of the Grantee's death, Section 5, as applicable;1(ii) In the event that the Grantee's service with the Company (including any subsidiary thereof) is terminated for Cause, theGrantee shall automatically forfeit his right to exercise any portion of the Option granted hereunder which shall automatically be cancelled effective on thedate of such termination. (iii) If, however, the Grantee's service is terminated for any reason other than for Cause, any portion of the Option grantedhereunder that is vested but has not been exercised as of the date of such termination shall automatically expire, if not exercised, on the ninetieth (90th) dayfollowing Grantee’s termination of service with the Company, provided, however, that if the Grantee’s service terminates due to his retirement or permanentdisability, the portion of the Option that is vested but has not been exercised as of the date of the Grantee’s termination of service due to retirement orpermanent disability shall remain exercisable, subject to the terms and conditions of Section 3 (c) of this Agreement, for a period of one year following thedate of the Grantee’s termination of service with the Company.(c) Normal Expiration of Option. This Option shall not be exercisable after the tenth anniversary of the Grant Date. This Option maynot be exercised for a fraction of a share of Common Stock. Unvested Options are subject to cancellation as provided in the Plan. (d) Accelerated Vesting. All of the Grantee's outstanding but unvested stock options shall vest immediately upon the occurrence of aChange in Control (as defined in Appendix A hereto).4. Conditions to Exercise. This Option may not be exercised by Grantee unless the following conditions are met:(a) Securities Requirements. Legal counsel for the Company must be satisfied at the time of exercise that the issuance of Option Sharesupon exercise will be in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and applicable United States federal, state, local andforeign laws; and (b) Payment of Exercise Price. At the time of exercise of all or any portion of the Option, the Grantee must pay the full purchase price forthe Option Shares being purchased hereunder (i) in cash (or by certified check) or (ii) by delivery of shares of Common Stock previously acquired by theGrantee or (iii) through a combination of option (i) and (ii). Details with respect to the methods for exercise, payment and delivery of Option Shares,including requirements for the payment of withholding taxes applicable thereto are as set forth in the Plan.5. Transferability. This Option may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of by Grantee, exceptby will or the laws of descent and distribution (in which case, such transferee shall succeed to the rights and obligations of Grantee hereunder). DuringGrantee's lifetime, the Option shall only be exercisable by Grantee. If Grantee or anyone claiming under or through Grantee attempts to violate this Section 5,such attempted violation shall be null and void and without effect, and the Company's obligation hereunder shall terminate. If at the time of Grantee's deaththis Option has not been fully exercised, Grantee's estate or any person who acquires the right to exercise this Option by bequest or inheritance or by reasonof Grantee's death may, at any time within one year after the date of Grantee's death (but in no event after the expiration of two years from the Grant Date),exercise this Option with respect to the number of shares, determined under Section 3 above, as to which Grantee could have exercised the Option at the timeof Grantee's death. The applicable requirements of Section 4 above must be satisfied in full at the time of such exercise.26. Administration. Any action taken or decision made by the Company, the Board or the Committee or its delegates arising out of or inconnection with the construction, administration, interpretation or effect of the Plan or this Agreement shall lie within its sole and absolute discretion, as thecase may be, and shall be final, conclusive and binding on Grantee and all persons claiming under or through Grantee. By accepting this grant or otherbenefit under the Plan, Grantee and each person claiming under or through Grantee shall be conclusively deemed to have indicated acceptance andratification of, and consent to, any action taken under the Plan by the Company, the Board or the Committee or its delegates.7. No Rights as Stockholder. Unless and until a certificate or certificates representing shares of Common Sock shall have been issued toGrantee (or any person acting under Section 5 above), Grantee shall not be or have any of the rights or privileges of a stockholder of the Company withrespect to shares of Common Stock acquirable upon exercise of the Option.8. Investment Representation. Grantee hereby acknowledges that the shares of Common Stock which Grantee may acquire by exercisingthe Option shall be acquired for investment without a view to distribution, within the meaning of the Securities Act, and shall not be sold, transferred,assigned, pledged or hypothecated in the absence of an effective registration statement for the shares of Common Stock under the Securities Act andapplicable state securities laws or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws.Grantee also agrees that the shares of Common Stock which Grantee may acquire by exercising the Option will not be sold or otherwise disposed of in anymanner which would constitute a violation of any applicable securities laws, whether federal or state.9. Listing and Registration of Common Stock. The Company, in its discretion, may postpone the issuance and/or delivery of shares ofCommon Stock upon an exercise of this Option until registration, or other qualification of such shares under any state and/or federal law, rule or regulation asthe Company may reasonably in good faith consider appropriate.10. Notices. Any notice hereunder to the Company shall be addressed to the Company, NexMed, Inc., 350 Corporate Blvd., Robbinsville,NJ 08691, Attention: Secretary, and any notice hereunder to Grantee shall be addressed to Grantee at Grantee's last address on the records of the Company,subject to the right of either party to designate at any time hereafter in writing some other address. Any notice shall be deemed to have been duly given whendelivered personally, one day following dispatch if sent by reputable overnight courier, fees prepaid, or three days following mailing if sent by registeredmail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as set forth above.311. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successors to the Company and all personslawfully claiming under Grantee.12. Governing Law. The validity, construction, interpretation administration and effect of the Plan, and of its rules and regulations, andrights relating to the Plan and to this Agreement, shall be governed by the substantive laws, but not the choice of law rules, of the State of Nevada.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Grantee have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. NexMed, Inc.______________________ 4GRANTEE ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT, NOR IN THE NEXMED, INC. RECOGNITION AND RETENTIONSTOCK INCENTIVE PLAN WHICH IS INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE, SHALL CONFER UPON GRANTEE ANY RIGHT WITH RESPECT TOCONTINUATION OF SERVICE BY THE COMPANY, NOR SHALL IT INTERFERE IN ANY WAY WITH GRANTEE’S RIGHT OR THE COMPANY’SRIGHT TO TERMINATE SERVICE AT ANY TIME, WITH OR WITHOUT CAUSE. Grantee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and represents that he is familiar with the terms and provisions thereof, and hereby accepts this Optionsubject to all of the terms and provisions of the Plan thereof except as otherwise specifically stated in this Option Agreement. Grantee has reviewed the Planand this Option Agreement in this entirety, has had an opportunity to obtain the advice of counsel prior to executing this Option Agreement and fullyunderstands all provisions of this Option Agreement. Grantee hereby agrees to accept as binding, conclusive and final all decisions or interpretations of theBoard upon any questions arising under the Plan. GRANTEE______________________ 5 Appendix AChange in ControlFor the purpose of this Agreement, a "Change in Control" shall be deemed to have taken place if:A. Individuals who, on the date hereof, constitute the Board (the "Incumbent Directors") cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board,provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof, whose election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which suchperson is named as a nominee for director, without written objection to such nomination) shall be an Incumbent Director; provided, however, that, noindividual initially elected or nominated as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to directors or as aresult of any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any person other than the Board shall be deemed to be anIncumbent Director;B. Any "Person" (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) is or becomes a "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of theCompany representing 25% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities eligible to vote for the election of the Board(the "Voting Securities"); provided, however, that, the event described in this paragraph B shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control by virtue of any ofthe following acquisitions: (i) by the Company or any subsidiary of the Company in which the Company owns more than 25% of the combined voting powerof such entity (a "Subsidiary"), (ii) by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary, (iii) by anyunderwriter temporarily holding the Company's Voting Securities pursuant to a public offering of such Voting Securities, (iv) pursuant to a Non-QualifyingTransaction (as defined in paragraph C immediately below), (v) pursuant to any acquisition by Executive or by any Person which is an "affiliate" (within themeaning of 17 C.F.R. § 230.405) of Executive (an "Excluded Person");C. The consummation of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or similar form of corporate transaction involving the Company or any of itsSubsidiaries that requires the approval of the Company's stockholders, whether for such transaction or the issuance of securities in the transaction (a"Business Combination"), unless immediately following such Business Combination: (i) more than 25% of the total voting power of (A) the corporationresulting from such Business Combination (the "Surviving Corporation"), or (B) if applicable, the ultimate parent corporation that directly or indirectly hasbeneficial ownership of 100% of the voting securities eligible to elect directors of the Surviving Company (the "Parent Corporation"), is represented by theCompany's Voting Securities that were outstanding immediately prior to such Business Combination (or, if applicable, is represented by shares into whichthe Company's Voting Securities were converted pursuant to such Business Combination), and such voting power among the holders thereof is insubstantially the same proportion as the voting power of the Company's Voting Securities among the holders thereof immediately prior to the BusinessCombination, (ii) no Person (other than (A) any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Surviving Corporation or the ParentCorporation or (B) an Excluded Person is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 25% or more of the total voting power of the outstandingvoting securities eligible to elect directors of the Parent Corporation (or, if there is no Parent Corporation, the Surviving Corporation) and (iii) at least amajority of the members of the board of directors of the Parent Corporation (or, if there is no Parent Corporation, the Surviving Corporation) following theconsummation of the Business Combination were Incumbent Directors at the time of the Board's approval of the execution of the initial agreement providingfor such Business Combination (any Business Combination which satisfies all of the criteria specified in (i), (ii) and (iii) above shall be deemed to be a "Non-Qualifying Transaction");6D. A sale of all or substantially all of the Company's assets, other than to an Excluded Person;E. The stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; orF. Such other events as the Board may designate.Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control of the Company shall not be deemed to occur solely because any person acquires beneficialownership of more than 25% of the Company's Voting Securities as a result of the acquisition of the Company's Voting Securities by the Company whichreduces the number of the Company's Voting Securities outstanding; provided, that, if after such acquisition by the Company such person becomes thebeneficial owner of additional Company Voting Securities that increases the percentage of outstanding Company Voting Securities beneficially owned bysuch person, a Change in Control of the Company shall then occur.7Exhibit 21SUBSIDIARIES OF NEXMED, INC.1. NexMed Holdings, Inc., incorporated in Delaware on February 28, 1997.2. NexMed (U.S.A.), Inc., incorporated in Delaware on June 18, 1997.3. NexMed International Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands on August 2, 1996.(a) NexMed International (Hong Kong) Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NexMed International Limited incorporated in Hong Kong on March 14,2001. Exhibit 23CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-91957, 333-46976, 333-96813, 333-105509, 333-107137, 333-111894, 333-117717 and 333-122114) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-93435) of our report dated March 15, 2005relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 15, 2005 Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION I, Y. Joseph Mo, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NexMed, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (b) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; (c) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (d) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and (e) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ Y. Joseph Mo Y. Joseph Mo Chief Executive Officer Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATION I, Vivian H. Liu, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NexMed, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ Vivian H. LiuName: Vivian H. LiuTitle: Chief Financial Officer Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Y. Joseph Mo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report ofNexMed, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of NexMed, Inc. Date: March 16, 2005By: /s/ Y. Joseph Mo Y. Joseph Mo Chief Executive Officer Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Vivian H. Liu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report ofNexMed, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of NexMed, Inc. Date: March 16, 2005By: /s/ Vivian H. Liu Vivian H. Liu Chief Financial Officer
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above