Quarterlytics / Consumer Cyclical / Restaurants / Ark Restaurants

Ark Restaurants

arkr · NASDAQ Consumer Cyclical
Claim this profile
Ticker arkr
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Restaurants
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2007 Annual Report · Ark Restaurants
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846A;003

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 1

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:41

07665

Ark
Restaurants
Corp.

2007 ANNUAL REPORT

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846B;003

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 2

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:41

50647

The Company

We are a New York corporation formed in 1983. As of the fiscal year ended September 29, 2007,
we owned and/or operated 23 restaurants and bars, 24 fast food concepts, catering operations, and
wholesale and retail bakeries through our subsidiaries. Initially our facilities were located only in New
York City. As of the fiscal year ended September 29, 2007, seven of our restaurant and bar facilities are
located in New York City, four are located in Washington, D.C., five are located in Las Vegas, Nevada,
two are located in Atlantic City, New Jersey, three are located at the Foxwoods Resort Casino in
Ledyard, Connecticut and one is located in the Faneuil Hall Marketplace in Boston, Massachusetts.

We will provide without charge a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
including financial statements and schedules thereto, to each of our
ended September 29, 2007,
shareholders of record on February 6, 2008 and each beneficial holder on that date, upon receipt of a
written request therefore mailed our offices, 85 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003 Attention:
Treasurer.

2

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846C;005

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 1

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

51054

February 11, 2008

Dear Shareholders:

Annually I sit down and try best to convey the past year’s events that impacted our balance sheet
and income statements as well as review the business principals which govern our actions. This year I
am compelled to repeat a good part of last year’s letter. I think in that writing I was able to produce a
document that clearly set forth management’s philosophy. While numbers do speak for themselves,
those numbers are better understood within a context of your management’s mission to maximize cash
flow and create value for shareholders.

If you have been a reader of these letters in past years you know that we are conservative. We have
no long term debt other than $827,000 remaining on a $1 Million purchase money mortgage in
connection with our purchase this past year of the Durgin Park restaurant. We have a strong balance
sheet and an envied working capital position. We pay our purveyors’ invoices on a ten day cycle. We
intend to keep things that way. Last fiscal year we paid regular dividends of $1.49 and a special dividend
of $3.00 for each common share. In the last quarter of fiscal 2007 we raised our quarterly dividend to
$0.44 per share from the prior $0.35 per share. Our cash, cash equivalents and short term investment
position at the end of the fiscal year was $13,210,000.

We do not have any inclinations to expand unless we can enter a business on terms which meet our
disciplined criteria. We do not guarantee our leases. The locations we choose must be in highly visible
landmarks with favorable demand (people vs. restaurant seats). This has led us to casinos, train stations
and public parks. By the way, this is no assurance of success. We have had less than acceptable returns
and occasional failure when our judgment led us to believe the stars were aligned in our favor.
Therefore every aspect of our negotiations becomes important. Our lease costs must be reasonable.
Generally in newly negotiated restaurant operations we try to pay 10% of our projected sales for rent,
real estate taxes, common area charges and utilities. We ask landlord/developers to participate in the
capital structure of our business by subsidizing our construction costs with tenant improvement money.
When this money is not available we seek partners to provide the capital for new opportunities when
we believe returns can be favorable to their investment and to our management effort. Our aim is to
lower risk; our cash is precious. Occasionally, we will find a situation where it is appropriate to invest
our own money and not take on partners. Significantly, we are in constant review of our portfolio of
restaurant businesses. We do not want to stick around when the economics of a business decline and
cannot be fixed locking up our capital or partners’ capital in underperforming assets. In such cases we
look to sell these businesses (or if need be, close them to prevent further cash losses).

In fiscal 2007 our balance sheet and cash position improved, EBITDA from continuing operations
was substantially higher from the prior year. One of the reasons for higher EBITDA was the better
utilization of outdoor caf seats in our Washington, D.C. and New York City restaurants as a result of
better weather this year as compared to that of last year during the spring and summer months. Also,
demand was generally strong in all venues. Our comparative sales were up 12.5% in New York City,
16.2% in Florida, 5.0% in Las Vegas and 9.3% in Washington DC. These numbers are impressive,
however, we should not take them for granted. They are the benefit of much hard work, a favorable
economy and as I mentioned some good luck with weather.

The year also benefited from the acquisition of the Boston landmark restaurant Durgin Park. This
has been a good acquisition for the Company. With the exception of this acquisition, we did not open
any new restaurants in fiscal 2007. We opened Yolos, a mexican grill and lounge at the Planet
Hollywood Hotel in Las Vegas on December 30, 2007, which is the first day of our second quarter of
the current fiscal year. In addition, in May 2008 we will open a substantial fast food operation at the
new MGM Grand Hotel Casino at Foxwoods Casino in Ledyard, Connecticut. Presently, we have
dialogues with developers for businesses that we anticipate will open in fiscal 2009. In December of
2007 we completed the sale of our Vivid property at the Venetian Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas.

3

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846C;005

Seq: 2

Job Seq: 2

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

04790

What was true in fiscal 2005 and 2006 was also influential in fiscal 2007. Minimum wage increases
continued to be phased into our operating costs in New York City and Washington, DC. Energy costs
continued to climb, as did accounting and legal costs as a result of securities law regulations.

I wish to thank every one working with us for their commitment to your Company.

Sincerely,

Michael Weinstein,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

4

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846D;005

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 3

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

67920

ARK RESTAURANTS CORP.

Corporate Office
Michael Weinstein, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Robert Towers, President, Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer
Robert Stewart, Chief Financial Officer
Vincent Pascal, Senior Vice President—Operations
Paul Gordon, Senior Vice President—Director of Las Vegas Operations
Walter Rauscher, Vice President—Corporate Sales & Catering
Nancy Alvarez, Controller
Marilyn Guy, Director of Human Resources
Colleen Hennigan, Director of Operations—Washington D.C.; Manager, Sequoia-Washington D.C.
John Oldweiler, Director of Purchasing
Luis Gomes, Director of Purchasing—Las Vegas Operation
Jennifer Sutton, Director of Operations and Financial Analysis
Joe Vazquez, Director of Facilities Management
Evyette Ortiz, Director of Marketing
Veronica Mijelshon, Director of Architecture and Design
Michael Buck, General Counsel and Secretary

Corporate Executive Chef
Bill Lalor

Executive Chefs
Chun Liao, Washington D.C.
Damien McEvoy, Las Vegas
Paul Savoy, Executive Sous Chef, Las Vegas Operations

Restaurant General Managers—New York
Bridgeen Hale, The Grill Room
Stephanie Torres, Columbus Bakery
Kelly Gallo, Canyon Road
Jennifer Baquierzo, El Rio Grande
Debra Lomurno, Sequoia
Donna Simms, Bryant Park Grill
Ridgley Trufant, Red
Ana Harris, Gonzalez y Gonzalez

Restaurant General Managers—Washington D.C.
Bender Gamiao, Thunder Grill
Matt Mitchell, America & Center Cafe´

Restaurant General Managers—Las Vegas
Charles Gerbino, Las Vegas Employee Dining Facility
Michael Credico, Gallagher’s Steakhouse
John Hausdorf, Las Vegas Room Service
Staci Green, Director of Sales, Las Vegas Operations
Mary Massa, Gonzalez y Gonzalez
Craig Tribus, America
Ivonne Escobedo, Village Streets
Gary Bogel, Stage Deli
Maria Medina, Venetian Food Court
Nitty Lee, V-Bar
Christopher Waltrip, Yolos

5

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846D;005

Seq: 2

Job Seq: 4

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

23700

Restaurant General Manager—Atlantic City
Donna McCarthy, Gallagher’s Steakhouse and Burger Bar

Restaurant General Managers—Florida
Mamunur Rosid, Hollywood Food Court
Darvin Prats, Tampa Food Court

Restaurant General Manager—Foxwoods
Patricia Reyes, The Grill at Two Trees, Lucky Seven and Fifth Street Cafe

Restaurant Chefs—New York
Armando Cortes, The Grill Room
Santiago Pascual, Sequoia
Santiago Moran, Red
Fermin Ramirez, El Rio Grande
Ruperto Ramirez, Canyon Road Grill
Mariano Veliz, Gonzalez y Gonzalez
Gadi Weinreich, Bryant Park Grill

Restaurant Chefs—Washington D.C.
Michael Foo, America & Center Cafe´
Chun Liao, Sequoia
Pang Sing Tang, Thunder Grill

Restaurant Chefs—Las Vegas
David Abraczinskas, Stage Deli
Hector Hernandez, America
Dave Simmons, Gallagher’s Steakhouse
Joshua Schlink, Banquets
Richard Harris, Las Vegas Employee Dining Facility
Sergio Salazar, Gonzalez y Gonzalez

Restaurant Chef—Atlantic City
Sergio Soto, Gallagher’s Steakhouse

Restaurant Chefs—Florida
Carlos Garcia Rios, Hollywood Food Court
Artemio Espinoza, Tampa Food Court

Restaurant Chef—Foxwoods
Rosalio Fuentes, The Grill at Two Trees, Lucky Seven and Fifth Street Cafe

6

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846E;004

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 5

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

66833

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

The following table sets forth certain financial data for the fiscal years ended in 2003 through 2007.
During fiscal year 2004, we sold three of our restaurants and closed one restaurant. During fiscal year
2005, we sold one of our restaurants which was considered held for sale in accordance with FAS 144
during part of fiscal year 2004 and part of fiscal year 2005. During fiscal year 2006, we classified one of
our restaurants as held for sale in accordance with FAS 144 and closed one restaurant. During fiscal
year 2007, we sold two of our restaurants and closed four of our restaurants. The operations of these
restaurants have been presented as discontinued operations for the 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 fiscal
years, and we have reclassified its statements of operations data for all periods presented, in accordance
with FAS 144. This information should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial
Statements and the notes thereto beginning at page F-1.

September 29,
2007

Years Ended
October 1,
2005

September 30,
2006

October 2,
2004
(In thousands, except per share data)

September 27,
2003

OPERATING DATA:

Total revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (income) expense, net. . . . . .
Income from continuing

operations before provision for
income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes. . . . . . . .
Limited partner interest in

income from variable interest
entity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from continuing

operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (loss) from discontinued
operations before provision
(benefit) for income taxes . . . . . .
Provision (benefit) for income taxes. . .
Income (loss) from discontinued

operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER

SHARE:

Continuing operations basic . . . . . .
Discontinued operations basic . . . .

Net basic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Continuing operations diluted . . . .
Discontinued operations diluted . .
Net diluted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average number of shares. . .
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

BALANCE SHEET DATA

(end of year):

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Working capital (deficit). . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shareholders’ equity per share. . . .
Facilities in operation—end of

year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 124,207
(112,871)
11,336
(1,157)

$ 110,519
(102,379)
8,140
(796)

$107,057
(97,963)
9,094
(756)

$105,041
(96,128)
8,913
(592)

$ 99,153
(94,069)
5,084
(404)

12,493
3,853

8,936
2,965

9,850
3,046

9,505
2,623

5,488
1,325

(236)

8,404

7,090
2,481

4,609
13,013

$
$

$
$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$
$

2.34
1.29

3.63
2.33
1.28
3.61

3,582
3,607

—

—

—

—

5,971

6,804

6,882

4,163

(1,124)
(373)

(751)
5,220

1.72
(0.22)

1.50
1.68
(0.21)
1.47

3,472
3,548

(326)
(101)

(225)
6,579

$
$

$
$
$
$

$
1.98
(0.06) $

$
1.92
$
1.92
(0.07) $
$
1.85

3,436
3,555

(311)
(86)

(225)
6,657

2.08
(0.07)

2.01
2.00
(0.07)
1.93

3,305
3,444

(1,112)
(268)

(844)
3,319

1.31
(0.27)

1.04
1.29
(0.26)
1.03

3,181
3,213

$
$

$
$
$
$

$ 52,181
11,571
704
38,090
10.63

$ 52,120
8,398
—
39,753
11.45

$ 47,435
3,399
—
37,413
10.89

$ 44,894
1,893
—
34,200
10.35

$ 43,635
(4,802)
7,226
24,826
7.80

48

48

48

41

47

7

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846F;009

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 6

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

84918

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Accounting period

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest September 30. We report fiscal years under a 52/53-
week format. This reporting method is used by many companies in the hospitality industry and is meant
to improve year-to-year comparisons of operating results. Under this method, certain years will contain
53 weeks. The fiscal years ended October 1, 2005, September 30, 2006 and September 29, 2007 each
included 52 weeks.

Overview

We have reclassified our statements of operations data for the prior periods presented below, in
the

accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”), as a result of the:
• sale of one of our restaurants during the fiscal year ended October 1, 2005;
• classification of one of our restaurants as held for sale and the closure of one of our restaurants

during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006; and

• sale of two of our restaurants and the closure of four of our restaurants during the fiscal year

ended September 29, 2007.

The operations of these restaurants have been presented as discontinued operations for the fiscal
years ended October 1, 2005, September 30, 2006 and September 29, 2007. See “Item 1—Recent
Restaurant Dispositions and Charges”, “Item 7—Recent Restaurant Dispositions” and Note 3 of
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenues

Total revenues increased by 12.4% from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007 and increased by 3.2% from fiscal
2005 to fiscal 2006. Revenues for fiscal 2007 were reduced by $2,686,000, revenues for fiscal 2006 were
reduced by $6,609,000 and revenues for fiscal 2005 were reduced by $10,190,000 as a result of the sale of
three facilities, the classification of one facility as “held for sale”, the closure of four of our facilities and
their reclassification to discontinued operations.

Same store sales increased 8.6%, or $8,900,000, on a Company-wide basis from fiscal 2006 to fiscal
2007. Same store sales in Las Vegas increased by $2,728,000, or 5%, in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal
2006. Same store sales in New York increased $3,775,000, or 12.5%, during fiscal 2007. Same store sales
in Washington D.C. increased by $1,558,000, or 9.3%, during fiscal 2007. The increase in New York and
Washington, D.C. was principally due to unusually good weather. Same store sales in Atlantic City
increased by $839,000 or 42.8% in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. The increase in Atlantic City was
primarily due to last year’s low level of sales following the start-up of these operations and the
rebranding of our Luna Lounge as Gallagher’s Burger Bar. The Company does not anticipate similar
percentage increases in Atlantic City after this fiscal year.

Other operating income, which consists of

the sale of merchandise at various restaurants,
management fee income and door sales were $2,145,000 in fiscal 2007, $2,423,000 in fiscal 2006 and
$1,826,000 in fiscal 2005.

Costs and Expenses

Food and beverage cost of sales as a percentage of total revenue was 25.8% in fiscal 2007, 25.3% in

fiscal 2006 and 25.2% in fiscal 2005.

Total costs and expenses increased by $10,492,000, or 10.2%, from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007
primarily due to increased sales and a $408,000 expense related to our share-based compensation plan.

Total costs and expenses increased by $4,416,000, or 4.5%, from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006 primarily
due to an increase in the minimum wage in New York and Washington, D.C., a $748,000 expense
related to our share-based compensation plan and increased occupancy costs.

8

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846F;009

Seq: 2

Job Seq: 7

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

71000

Payroll expenses as a percentage of total revenues was 30.4% in fiscal 2007 compared to 31.9% in
fiscal 2006 and 31.1% in fiscal 2005. Payroll expense was $37,767,000, $35,213,000 and $33,307,000 in
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In fiscal 2007, increased sales resulted in an increase in payroll
expenses. In fiscal 2005 and 2006, the increase of the minimum wage in New York and Washington,
D.C. resulted in an increase in payroll expenses. We continually evaluate our payroll expenses as they
relate to sales.

We typically incur significant pre-opening expenses in connection with our new restaurants that are
expensed as incurred. Furthermore, it is not uncommon that such restaurants experience operating
losses during the early months of operation.

In fiscal 2007, we:
• converted our bar, Luna Lounge, at the Resorts Atlantic City Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City,

New Jersey, into a restaurant, Gallagher’s Burger Bar;

• expanded our operations at the Foxwoods Resort Casino by opening The Grill at Two Trees in
the Two Trees Inn, a facility owned by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and a part of the
Foxwoods Resort Casino, in Ledyard, Connecticut;

• began construction of a Mexican restaurant and lounge, Yolos, at

the rethemed Planet

Hollywood Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada; and

• began operating the Durgin Park Restaurant and the Black Horse Tavern in Boston,

Massachusetts.

We purchased the Durgin Park facility from the previous owner for $2,000,000 in cash and a

$1,000,000 five year promissory note bearing interest at a rate of 7% per year.

We experienced $129,000 in pre-opening and early operating losses at our Yolos facility in fiscal
2007. Also during fiscal 2007, we entered into an agreement to design and lease a food court at the to
be constructed MGM Grand Casino at the Foxwoods Resort Casino. The obligation to pay rent for this
facility is not effective until the food court opens for business. We anticipate the food court will open
during our third quarter of the 2008 fiscal year. All pre-opening expenses will be borne by outside
investors who will invest in a limited liability company established to develop, construct, operate and
manage the food court. We will be the managing member of this limited liability company and, through
this limited liability company, we will lease and manage the operations of the food court in exchange
for a monthly management fee equal to five-percent of the gross receipts of the food court. Neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries will contribute any capital to this limited liability company. None of the
obligations of this limited liability company will be guaranteed by us and investors in this limited
liability company will have no recourse against us or any of our assets.

In fiscal 2006, we established operations in Atlantic City, New Jersey by opening a bar, Luna
Lounge, and a separate restaurant, a Gallagher’s Steakhouse, in the Resorts Atlantic City Hotel and
Casino. We experienced $447,000 in pre-opening and early operating losses at these facilities in fiscal
2006. Further during fiscal 2006, we established operations at the Foxwoods Resort Casino in Ledyard,
Connecticut by opening a restaurant, The Fifth Street Cafe, in its newly expanded poker room in March
2006 and a fast-casual restaurant, Lucky Seven, in the Bingo Hall in May 2006. All pre-opening
expenses were borne by outside investors who invested in a limited liability company established to
develop, construct, operate and manage these facilities. We did not open any new restaurants and no
pre-opening expenses and early operating losses were incurred during fiscal 2005.

General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenue, were 7.3% in fiscal 2007,

6.5% in fiscal 2006 and 6.8% in fiscal 2005.

During the fiscal year ended September 29, 2007, we managed one consolidated restaurant we did
not own (El Rio Grande) and also managed our Tampa and Hollywood Florida food court operations
and our Foxwoods operations. We managed two restaurants we did not own (The Saloon and El Rio
Grande) and also managed our Tampa and Hollywood Florida food court operations and our Foxwoods
operations at September 30, 2006. We managed two restaurants we did not own (The Saloon and El Rio
Grande) and also managed the Tampa and Hollywood Florida food court operations at October 1, 2005.
Due to adoption of new accounting pronouncements, $3,873,000 in sales of El Rio Grande were

9

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846F;009

Seq: 3

Job Seq: 8

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

53941

included in consolidated sales for fiscal 2007. Sales of El Rio Grande, which are not included in
consolidated sales during fiscal 2006 and 2005, were $3,519,000 and $3,345,000, respectively. Our lease
of The Saloon was converted into a management agreement effective as of August 22, 2004, whereby
we received a management fee of $7,000 per month regardless of the results of operations of this
restaurant. This restaurant closed effective July 25, 2006. During fiscal 2004, we entered into agreements
to manage 11 fast food restaurants located in the Hard Rock Casinos in Hollywood and Tampa, Florida.
Sales from these operations totaled $12,170,000 during the 2007 fiscal year, $10,469,000 during the 2006
fiscal year and $8,843,000 during the 2005 fiscal year. During fiscal 2006, we established operations at
the Foxwoods Resort Casino in Ledyard, Connecticut by managing a restaurant, The Fifth Street Cafe,
in its newly expanded poker room and a fast-casual restaurant, Lucky Seven, in the Bingo Hall. Sales
from these operations totaled $4,471,000 during the 2007 fiscal year and $2,389,000 during the 2006
fiscal year.

Interest expense was $65,000 in fiscal 2007, $8,000 in fiscal 2006 and $16,000 in fiscal 2005. Interest
income was $417,000 in fiscal 2007, $90,000 in fiscal 2006 and $100,000 in fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2007
we began an investment program utilizing our large cash balances. Investments are made in government
securities and investment quality corporate instruments.

Other income, which generally consists of purchasing service fees and other income at various

restaurants, was $805,000, $714,000 and $672,000 for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes reflects Federal income taxes calculated on a consolidated basis and
state and local income taxes calculated by each New York subsidiary on a non-consolidated basis. Most
of the restaurants we own or manage are owned or managed by a separate subsidiary.

For state and local income tax purposes, the losses incurred by a subsidiary may only be used to
offset that subsidiary’s income, with the exception of the restaurants operating in the District of
Columbia. Accordingly, our overall effective tax rate has varied depending on the level of losses
incurred at individual subsidiaries.

Our overall effective tax rate in the future will be affected by factors such as the level of losses
incurred at our New York facilities, which cannot be consolidated for state and local tax purposes, pre-
tax income earned outside of New York City and the utilization of state and local net operating loss
carry forwards. Nevada has no state income tax and other states in which we operate have income tax
rates substantially lower in comparison to New York. In order to utilize more effectively tax loss carry
forwards at restaurants that were unprofitable, we have merged certain profitable subsidiaries with
certain loss subsidiaries.

The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 provides tax credits to us for FICA taxes paid on tip
income of restaurant service personnel. The net benefit to us was $799,000 in fiscal 2007, $733,000 in
fiscal 2006 and $779,000 in fiscal 2005.

During fiscal 2006, we and the Internal Revenue Service finalized the adjustments to our Federal
income tax returns for fiscal years 1999 through 2004. This settlement did not have a material effect on
our consolidated financial statements.

Our tax return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 is currently under audit by the Internal
Revenue Service. Our tax returns for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 are
currently under audit by New York State. We expect no material adjustments will result from these
examinations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary source of capital has been cash provided by operations and funds available from our
main bank, Bank Leumi USA. We have, from time to time, also utilized equipment financing in
connection with the construction of a restaurant and seller financing in connection with the acquisition
of a restaurant. We utilize capital primarily to fund the cost of developing and opening new restaurants,
acquiring existing restaurants owned by others and remodeling existing restaurants we own.

10

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846F;009

Seq: 4

Job Seq: 9

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

65433

The net cash provided by investing activities in fiscal 2007 was $260,000. Cash was used for the
replacement of fixed assets at existing restaurants, converting our bar, Luna Lounge, at the Resorts
Atlantic City Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey, into a restaurant, Gallagher’s Burger Bar,
opening The Grill at Two Trees in the Two Trees Inn, a facility owned by the Mashantucket Pequot
Tribal Nation and a part of the Foxwoods Resort Casino, in Ledyard, Connecticut, purchasing the
Durgin Park Restaurant and the Black Horse Tavern in Boston, Massachusetts from the previous owner
for $2,000,000 in cash and a $1,000,000 five year promissory note bearing interest at a rate of 7% per
year, and the construction of Yolos, a Mexican restaurant, at the Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino
(formerly known as the Aladdin Resort and Casino) in Las Vegas, Nevada. Cash was also used to
purchase investment securities. Cash provided by investing activities was generated from the sale of
discontinued operations and the sale of investment securities. The net cash used in investing activities in
fiscal 2006 of $4,934,000 was primarily used for the replacement of fixed assets at existing restaurants,
the construction of a restaurant and bar in Atlantic City, New Jersey and the construction of Yolos. The
net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2005 of $4,236,000 was primarily used for the replacement
of fixed assets at existing restaurants and the construction of a restaurant and bar in Atlantic City, New
Jersey.

The net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2007 of $15,309,000, $3,628,000 in fiscal 2006 and

$4,397,000 in fiscal 2005 was principally used for the payment of dividends.

We had a working capital surplus of $11,571,000 at September 29, 2007 as compared to a working

capital surplus of $8,398,000 at September 30, 2006.

Our Revolving Credit and Term Loan Facility (the “Facility”) with our main bank (Bank Leumi
USA), which included a $8,500,000 credit line to finance the development and construction of new
restaurants and for working capital purposes at our existing restaurants, matured on March 12, 2005.
We do not currently plan to enter into another credit facility and expect required cash to be provided
by operations.

A quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.35 per share was declared on October 12, 2004.
Subsequent to October 12, 2004, quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.35 per share were
declared on January 12, April 12, July 12, October 10, December 20, 2006 and April 12, 2007. We
declared an increase in our quarterly cash dividend to $0.44 per share on May 23, 2007 and a
subsequent quarterly cash dividend reflecting this increased amount was declared on October 12, 2007.
In addition, we declared a special cash dividend in the amount of $3.00 per share on December 20,
2006. Prior to this, we had not paid any cash dividends since our inception. We intend to continue to
pay such quarterly cash dividend for the foreseeable future, however, the payment of future dividends is
at the discretion of our Board of Directors and is based on future earnings, cash flow, financial
condition, capital requirements, changes in U.S. taxation and other relevant factors.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

To facilitate an understanding of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments, the

following data is provided:

Payments Due by Period

Total

Within
1 year

2-3 years

4-5 years

After 5
years

(in thousands of dollars)

Contractual Obligations:

Operating Leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$40,666

$5,837

$10,138

$11,236

$13,455

Total Contractual Cash

Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$40,666

$5,837

$10,138

$11,236

$13,455

Other Commercial Commitments:

Letters of Credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total Commercial Commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$154

$154

$—

$—

$154

$154

$—

$—

$—

$—

Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period

Total

Within
1 year

2-3 years

4-5 years

After 5
years

(in thousands of dollars)

11

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846F;009

Seq: 5

Job Seq: 10

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

08577

Restaurant Expansion

During the fiscal year ended September 29, 2007, we:
• converted our bar, Luna Lounge, at the Resorts Atlantic City Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City,

New Jersey, into a restaurant, Gallagher’s Burger Bar;

• expanded our operations at the Foxwoods Resort Casino by opening The Grill at Two Trees in
the Two Trees Inn, a facility owned by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation and a part of the
Foxwoods Resort Casino, in Ledyard, Connecticut;

• began construction of a Mexican restaurant and lounge, Yolos, at

the rethemed Planet

Hollywood Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada; and

• began operating the Durgin Park Restaurant and the Black Horse Tavern in Boston,

Massachusetts.

We purchased the Durgin Park facility from the previous owner for $2,000,000 in cash and a

$1,000,000 five year promissory note bearing interest at a rate of 7% per year.

Also during the fiscal year ended September 29, 2007, we entered into an agreement to design and
lease a food court at the to be constructed MGM Grand Casino at the Foxwoods Resort Casino. The
obligation to pay rent for this facility is not effective until the food court opens for business. We
anticipate the food court will open during our third quarter of the 2008 fiscal year. All pre-opening
expenses will be borne by outside investors who will invest in a limited liability company established to
develop, construct, operate and manage the food court. We will be the managing member of this limited
liability company and, through this limited liability company, we will lease and manage the operations
of the food court in exchange for a monthly management fee equal to five-percent of the gross receipts
of the food court.

Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries will contribute any capital to this limited liability company.
None of the obligations of this limited liability company will be guaranteed by us and investors in this
limited liability company will have no recourse against us or any of our assets.

The opening of a new restaurant is invariably accompanied by substantial pre-opening expenses
and early operating losses associated with the training of personnel, excess kitchen costs, costs of
supervision and other expenses during the pre-opening period and during a post-opening “shake out”
period until operations can be considered to be functioning normally. The amount of such pre-opening
expenses and early operating losses can generally be expected to depend upon the size and complexity
of the facility being opened. We incurred $129,000 in pre-opening expenses in fiscal 2007.

Our restaurants generally do not achieve substantial increases in revenue from year to year, which
we consider to be typical of the restaurant industry. To achieve significant increases in revenue or to
replace revenue of restaurants that lose customer favor or which close because of lease expirations or
other reasons, we would have to open additional restaurant facilities or expand existing restaurants.
There can be no assurance that a restaurant will be successful after it is opened, particularly since in
many instances we do not operate our new restaurants under a trade name currently used by us, thereby
requiring new restaurants to establish their own identity.

Apart from these agreements, we are not currently committed to any projects. We may take
advantage of opportunities we consider to be favorable, when they occur, depending upon the
availability of financing and other factors.

Recent Restaurant Dispositions and Charges

We entered into a sale and leaseback agreement with GE Capital in November 2000 to refinance
the purchase of various restaurant equipment at our food and beverage facilities at Desert Passage, the
retail complex at the Aladdin Resort & Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. In 2002, the operations at the
Aladdin were abandoned. The lease matured in November 2005 and, in connection therewith, we made
an unprovided for lump sum payment of $142,000 due under this lease. This lump sum payment was
included in discontinued operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2006.

12

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846F;009

Seq: 6

Job Seq: 11

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

51487

Our bar/nightclub facility Venus, located at the Venetian Casino Resort, experienced a steady
decline in sales and we felt that a new concept was needed at this location. During the first quarter of
2005, this bar/nightclub facility was closed for re-concepting and re-opened as “Vivid” on February 4,
2005. Total conversion costs were approximately $400,000. Sales at the new bar/nightclub facility
subsequently failed to reach a level sufficient to achieve the results we required and we have identified
a buyer for this facility. As of December 31, 2005, we classified the assets and liabilities of this
bar/nightclub facility as “held for sale” in accordance with SFAS No. 144 based on the fact that the
facility has met the criteria under SFAS No. 144. Based on the offers made for this facility, we recorded
an impairment charge of $537,000 during the first fiscal quarter of 2007. An additional impairment
charge of $34,000 was recorded during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2007 as a result of the sale of the
facility. We recorded operating losses of $188,000 and $486,000, respectively, during the fiscal years
ended September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006. The impairment charges and operating losses are
included in discontinued operations.

Effective August 22, 2004, our lease for The Saloon at the Neonopolis Center at Fremont Street
was converted into a management agreement whereby we received a management fee of $7,000 per
month regardless of the results of operations of this restaurant. In June 2006, the owner of the
Neonopolis Center at Fremont Street sold the building to a new entity who, on June 25, 2006, exercised
its option to terminate the management agreement upon thirty days written notice to us.

On July 6, 2006, the landlord for the Vico’s Burrito’s fast food facility at the Venetian Casino
Resort, General Growth Properties,notified us that the landlord was exercising an option granted to it
pursuant to the lease for the facility to terminate the lease in exchange for the landlord providing us
with the unamortized portion of the non-removable improvements located in the facility. On August 10,
2006, we and our landlord for this facility entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which the
landlord agreed to pay us $200,000 for the unamortized portion of the non-removable improvements
located in the facility.

During fiscal 2006, the landlord for our Metropolitan Caf and one of our Columbus Bakery
facilities notified us that he was planning on demolishing the building where these facilities are located
and, therefore, would not be renewing these leases at the end of their term. The leases at these facilities
terminated on October 1, 2006.

Also during fiscal 2006, we were approached by the Venetian Casino Resort who indicated that,
due to the expansion of the Grand Canal Shoppes, our Lutece and Tsunami locations, as well as a
portion of our Vivid location, in the Grand Canal Shoppes were desired by other tenants. The Venetian
Casino Resort offered to purchase these locations from us for an aggregate of $14,000,000. After
evaluating the offer, we determined that such offer made it advantageous for us to redeploy these
assets. Effective December 1, 2006, our subsidiaries that leased each of our Lutece, Tsunami and Vivid
locations at the Venetian Resort Hotel Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada, entered into an agreement to sell
Lutece, Tsunami and a portion of the Vivid location used by Lutece as a prep kitchen to Venetian
Casino Resort, LLC for an aggregate of $14,000,000. Our Lutece location closed on December 3, 2006
and our Tsunami location closed on January 3, 2007. We realized a gain of $7,814,000 ($5,196,000 after
taxes, or $1.45 per share) on the sale of these facilities. We recorded operating income of $34,000 for
the fiscal year ended September 29, 2007. The gain on sale and income are included in discontinued
operations.

As a result of the above mentioned sales or closures, we allocated $100,000 and $75,000 of goodwill

to these restaurants and reduced goodwill by these amounts in fiscal 2007 and 2005, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies

Financial Reporting Release No. 60, published by the SEC, recommends that all companies include
a discussion of critical accounting policies used in the preparation of their financial statements. Our
significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial
statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact our financial condition and results of
operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those
policies that have the most significant impact on our consolidated financial statements and require

13

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846F;009

Seq: 7

Job Seq: 12

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

17981

management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those
estimates.

We believe that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other
reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause a material effect on our consolidated
results of operations, financial position or cash flows for the periods presented in this report.

Below are listed certain policies that management believes are critical:

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements requires the application of certain accounting policies,
which may require us to make estimates and assumptions of future events. In the process of preparing
its consolidated financial statements, we estimate the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and
liabilities, which are not readily apparent from other sources. The primary estimates underlying our
financial statements include allowances for potential bad debts on accounts and notes receivable, the
useful lives and recoverability of its assets, such as property and intangibles, fair values of financial
instruments and share-based compensation, the realizable value of its tax assets and other matters.
Management bases its estimates on certain assumptions, which they believe are reasonable in the
circumstances and actual results could differ from those estimates.

Long-Lived Assets

We annually assess any impairment in value of long-lived assets to be held and used. We evaluate
the possibility of impairment by comparing anticipated undiscounted cash flows to the carrying amount
of the related long-lived assets. If such cash flows are less than carrying value we then reduce the asset
to its fair value. Fair value is generally calculated using discounted cash flows. Various factors such as
sales growth and operating margins and proceeds from a sale are part of this analysis. Future results
could differ from our projections with a resulting adjustment to income in such period.

Leases

We are obligated under various lease agreements for certain restaurants. We recognize rent
expense on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term, including option periods as described
below. Within the provisions of certain leases there are escalations in payments over the base lease
term, as well as renewal periods. The effects of the escalations have been reflected in rent expense on a
straight-line basis over the expected lease term, which includes option periods when it is deemed to be
reasonably assured that we would incur an economic penalty for not exercising the option. Percentage
rent expense is generally based upon sales levels and is expensed as incurred. Certain leases include
both base rent and percentage rent. We record rent expense on these leases based upon reasonably
assured sales levels. The consolidated financial statements reflect the same lease terms for amortizing
leasehold improvements as were used in calculating straight-line rent expense for each restaurant. Our
judgments may produce materially different amounts of amortization and rent expense than would be
reported if different lease terms were used.

Deferred Income Tax Valuation Allowance

We provide such allowance due to uncertainty that some of the deferred tax amounts may not be
realized. Certain items, such as state and local tax loss carry forwards, are dependent on future earnings
or the availability of tax strategies. Future results could require an increase or decrease in the valuation
allowance and a resulting adjustment to income in such period.

Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

During 2001, the FASB issued FAS 142, which requires that for us, effective September 28, 2002,
goodwill, including the goodwill included in the carrying value of investments accounted for using the
equity method of accounting, and certain other intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite useful
life, cease amortizing. FAS 142 requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets be assessed for

14

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846F;009

Seq: 8

Job Seq: 13

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

63856

impairment using fair value measurement techniques. Specifically, goodwill impairment is determined
using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential
impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit (the Company is being treated as one
reporting unit) with its net book value (or carrying amount), including goodwill. If the fair value of the
reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired
and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the
amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the
implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the
carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is
determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That
is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including
any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination
and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The
impairment test for other intangible assets consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible
asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

Determining the fair value of the reporting unit under the first step of the goodwill impairment test
and determining the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit (including
unrecognized intangible assets) under the second step of the goodwill impairment test is judgmental in
nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Similarly, estimates and
assumptions are used in determining the fair value of other intangible assets. These estimates and
assumptions could have a significant impact on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized and
also the magnitude of any such charge. To assist in the process of determining goodwill impairment, we
obtain appraisals from independent valuation firms. In addition to the use of independent valuation
firms, we perform internal valuation analyses and consider other market information that is publicly
available. Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using discounted cash flows and market
comparisons and recent transactions. These approaches use significant estimates and assumptions
including projected future cash flows (including timing), discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in
future cash flows, perpetual growth rate, determination of appropriate market comparables and the
determination of whether a premium or discount should be applied to comparables. Based on the above
policy no impairment charges were recorded during the fiscal years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005.

Share-Based Compensation

Effective October 2, 2005 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”), and related interpretations and began expensing the
grant-date fair value of employee stock options. Prior to October 2, 2005, the Company applied
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related
interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. Accordingly, prior to October 2, 2005, no
compensation expense has been recognized in net income for employee stock options, as options
granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant.

Upon adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company elected to value employee stock options using the
Black-Scholes option valuation method that uses assumptions that relate to the expected volatility of
the Company’s common stock, the expected dividend yield of our stock, the expected life of the options
and the risk free interest rate. The assumptions used for the options granted on December 21, 2004,
which were unvested at the time of the adoption of SFAS 123R, included a risk free interest rate of
3.37%, volatility of 37%, a dividend yield of 3% and an expected life of three years.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective transition method and
therefore has not restated prior periods. Under this transition method, compensation cost associated
with employee stock options recognized during fiscal 2006 includes amortization related to the

15

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846F;009

Seq: 9

Job Seq: 14

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

12018

remaining unvested portion of stock awards granted prior to October 2, 2005, 105,000 options were
granted during fiscal 2007. No options were granted during fiscal year 2006.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has recently issued the following accounting

pronouncements:

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken
or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company is
required to adopt the provisions of FIN 48 during fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated results of operations and
financial position.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), “Fair Value
Measurements.” SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
all financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is
currently assessing the impact of SFAS 157 on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities—including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS
159 permits entities to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.
Upon adoption of SFAS 159, an entity may elect the fair value option for eligible items that exist at the
adoption date. Subsequent to the initial adoption, the election of the fair value option should only be
made at initial recognition of the asset or liability or upon a remeasurement event that gives rise to
new-basis accounting. SFAS 159 does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain
assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value nor does it eliminate disclosure requirements included in
other accounting standards. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial position and
results of operations.

On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS
141(R)”), and SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an
amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). These new standards will significantly change the
accounting for and reporting for business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority)
interests in consolidated financial statements. SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160 are required to be adopted
simultaneously and are effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December
15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS
141(R) and SFAS 160 on our consolidated financial statements.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

None.

16

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846G;006

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 15

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

91144

Market For The Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market for Our Common Stock

Our Common Stock, $.01 par value, is traded in the over-the-counter market on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol “ARKR.” The high and low sale prices for our Common Stock from
October 2, 2005 through September 29, 2007 are as follows:

High

Low

Calendar 2005

Fourth Quarter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$31.23

$26.70

Calendar 2006

First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Calendar 2007

First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30.50
30.50
28.57
32.89

35.37
36.99
37.63

27.00
27.11
23.09
26.55

30.60
33.01
35.71

Dividend Policy

A quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.35 per share was declared on October 12, 2004.
Subsequent to October 12, 2004, quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.35 per share were
declared on January 12, April 12, July 12, October 10 and December 20, 2006 and on April 12, 2007.
We declared an increase in our quarterly cash dividend to $0.44 per share on May 23, 2007 and a
subsequent quarterly cash dividend reflecting this increased amount was declared on October 12, 2007.
In addition, we declared a special cash dividend in the amount of $3.00 per share on December 20,
2006. Prior to this, we had not paid any cash dividends since our inception. We intend to continue to
pay such quarterly cash dividend for the foreseeable future, however, the payment of future dividends is
at the discretion of our Board of Directors and is based on future earnings, cash flow, financial
condition, capital requirements, changes in U.S. taxation and other relevant factors.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On August 22, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which
up to four million dollars of our common stock could be acquired in the open market over the twelve
months following such authorization at our discretion. The shares could have been purchased from time
to time at prevailing market prices through open market or unsolicited negotiated transactions,
depending on market conditions. Under the program, the purchases were to be funded from available
working capital, and the repurchased shares would be held in treasury or used for ongoing stock
issuances. At September 29, 2007, no shares had been purchased by us under the program.

As of December 14, 2007, there were 34 holders of record of our Common Stock, $.01 par value.
This does not include the number of persons whose stock is in nominee or “street name” accounts
through brokers.

17

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846G;006

Seq: 2

Job Seq: 16

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

47665

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846H;002

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 17

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:48

69270

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Ark Restaurants Corp.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ark Restaurants Corp. and
Subsidiaries as of September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 29, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Ark Restaurants Corp. and Subsidiaries as of September
29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, and their consolidated results of operations and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended September 29, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in
which it accounts for share-based compensation in fiscal year 2006.

/s/ J.H. COHN LLP

Jericho, New York
December 21, 2007

F-1

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846H1;002

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 18

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

67213

ARK RESTAURANTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term investments in available-for-sale securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Related party receivables, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term receivables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIXED ASSETS—At cost:

Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture, fixtures and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIXED ASSETS—Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTANGIBLE ASSETS—Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GOODWILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TRADEMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Accounts payable—trade. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued income taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of note payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OPERATING LEASE DEFERRED CREDIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOTE PAYABLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIMITED PARTNER INTEREST IN VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY . . . . . . .
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Common stock, par value $.01 per share—authorized, 10,000 shares; issued,
5,667 shares and 5,632 shares at September 29, 2007 and September 30,
2006, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less stock option receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less treasury stock of 2,070 shares at September 29, 2007 and September 30,
2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4,009
9,201
2,657
1,318
316
114
1,410
649
1,120
20,794
352

27,094
25,692
1,142
53,928
33,880
20,048
80
5,107
721
4,763
316
$52,181

$ 2,404
5,503
1,135
181
9,223
3,771
704
229
13,927
164

57
21,756
49
24,780
46,642
(166)

(8,386)
38,090
$52,181

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

$ 7,671
—
2,587
1,446
394
131
1,675
700
1,657
16,261
1,025

34,807
28,408
159
63,374
39,230
24,144
100
3,440
—
6,305
845
$52,120

$ 2,193
4,218
1,452
—
7,863
4,203
—
301
12,367
—

57
20,403
—
27,845
48,305
(166)

(8,386)
39,753
$52,120

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846H1;002

Seq: 2

Job Seq: 19

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

10006

ARK RESTAURANTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Years Ended

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

October 1,
2005

REVENUES:

Food and beverage sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$122,062
2,145

$108,096
2,423

$105,231
1,826

Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

124,207

110,519

107,057

COST AND EXPENSES:

Food and beverage cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payroll expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total cost and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OPERATING INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

32,058
37,746
16,288
15,012
9,046
2,721
112,871

11,336

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE:

Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65
(417)
(805)

Total other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1,157)

Income from continuing operations before provision for income

taxes and limited partner interest in variable interest entity . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Limited partner interest in income of variable interest entity. . . . .
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12,493
3,853
(236)
8,404

27,942
35,213
16,129
13,330
7,231
2,534
102,379

8,140

8
(90)
(714)

(796)

8,936
2,965
—
5,971

26,991
33,307
15,546
12,496
7,318
2,305
97,963

9,094

16
(100)
(672)

(756)

9,850
3,046
—
6,804

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

Income (loss) from operations of discontinued restaurants
(includes net gain on disposal of $7,814 for the year
ended September 29, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision (benefit) for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,090
2,481

(1,124)
(373)

(326)
(101)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS . . .
NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,609
$ 13,013

(751)
$ 5,220

(225)
$ 6,579

PER SHARE INFORMATION—BASIC AND DILUTED:

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BASIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from continuing operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

DILUTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

$

$

$

2.34
1.29
3.63

2.33
1.28

3.61

$

$

$

$

1.72
(0.22)
1.50

1.68
(0.21)

1.47

$

$

$

$

1.98
(0.06)
1.92

1.92
(0.07)

1.85

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES—BASIC . . .

3,582

3,472

3,436

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES—

DILUTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,607

3,548

3,555

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846H2;003

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 20

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

03389

ARK RESTAURANTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by

operating activities:

Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment loss on assets held for sale of discontinued

operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Limited partner interest in income of consolidated variable

interest entity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating lease deferred credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Related party receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable - trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash received from landlord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operating

activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Purchases of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment for purchase of Durgin Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments received on long-term receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in continuing investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in discontinued investing activities . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Tax benefit on exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal payments on note payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments received on stock option receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Distributions to limited partners of consolidated variable

interest entity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in financing activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW

INFORMATION:

Cash paid during the period for:

Years Ended

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

October 1,
2005

(In thousands)

$ 13,013

$ 5,220

$ 6,579

1,542
408
2,721
(7,814)

537

235
(339)

(70)
128
78
30
51
148
211
(317)
1,285
—
11,847

(83)
11,764

(3,655)
14,000
(29,189)
20,037
(2,000)
690
(117)
—
(117)

81
(115)
(16,078)
864
—

(61)
(15,309)
(3,662)
7,671
$ 4,009

$

64

(996)
748
3,778
—

—

—
23

(217)
(995)
(100)
(60)
1,019
(116)
(547)
448
(538)
3,000
10,667

(157)
10,510

(5,352)
—
—
—
—
418
(4,934)
—
(4,934)

595
—
(4,847)
624
—

187
—
3,694
—

—

—
(21)

(826)
176
36
116
198
43
510
(583)
(25)
—
10,084

(163)
9,921

(4,252)
—
—
—
—
416
(3,836)
(400)
(4,236)

—
(251)
(4,801)
457
198

—
(3,628)
1,948
5,723
$ 7,671

—
(4,397)
1,288
4,435
$ 5,723

$

8

$ 2,136

$

25

$ 3,341

Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 5,969

Non-cash financing activity:

Debt incurred in connection with acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,000

$ —

$ —

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846H2;003

Seq: 2

Job Seq: 21

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

69062

ARK RESTAURANTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHODLERS’ EQUITY
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2007, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND OCTOBER 1, 2005

Common Stock
Shares Amount

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

Retained
Earnings

Stock
Option
Receivable

Treasury
Stock

Total
Shareholders’
Equity

BALANCE—October 2, 2004 . . . . . . . 5,462
71

Exercise of stock options. . . . . . . .
Tax benefit on exercise of stock
options. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Payment on stock options

receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Payment of dividends—$1.40

per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

BALANCE—October 1, 2005 . . . . . . . 5,533
99

Exercise of stock options. . . . . . . .
Tax benefit on exercise of stock
options. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation. . . . . . .

Payment of dividends—$1.40 per

share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

BALANCE—September 30, 2006. . . . 5,632
35

Exercise of stock options. . . . . . . .
Tax benefit on exercise of stock
options. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation. . . . . . .
Payment of dividends—$4.49

per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Unrealized gain on available-

for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

—
—

—
—

—
—

—
—

—

—
—

(In thousands)

$54
2

$17,202
455

$—
—

$ 25,694
—

$(364)
—

$(8,386)
—

$ 34,200
457

—

—

—
—

56
1

—
—

—
—

57
—

—
—

—

—
—

780

—

—
—

18,437
623

595
748

—
—

20,403
864

81
408

—

—
—

—

—

—
—

—
—

—
—

—
—

—
—

—
—

—

49
—

—

—

(4,801)
6,579

27,472
—

—
—

(4,847)
5,220

27,845
—

—
—

(16,078)

—
13,013

—

198

—
—

—

—

—
—

(166)
—

(8,386)
—

—
—

—
—

—
—

—
—

(166)
—

(8,386)
—

—
—

—

—
—

—
—

—

—
—

780

198

(4,801)
6,579

37,413
624

595
748

(4,847)
5,220

39,753
864

81
408

(16,078)

49
13,013

BALANCE—September 29, 2007. . . . 5,667

$57

$21,756

$49

$ 24,780

$(166)

$(8,386)

$ 38,090

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 22

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

38771

ARK RESTAURANTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2007, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND OCTOBER 1, 2005

1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Ark Restaurants owns and operates 23 restaurants and bars, 24 fast food concepts, catering
operations and wholesale and retail bakeries. Seven restaurants are located in New York City, four are
located in Washington, D.C., five are located in Las Vegas, Nevada, two are located in Atlantic City,
New Jersey, three are located at the Foxwoods Resort Casino in Ledyard, Connecticut and one is
located in Boston, Massachusetts. The Las Vegas operations include three restaurants within the New
York-New York Hotel & Casino Resort and operation of the hotel’s room service, banquet facilities,
employee dining room and nine food court concepts; one bar within the Venetian Casino Resort as well
as three food court concepts. In Las Vegas, the Company also owns and operates one restaurant within
the Forum Shops at Caesar’s Shopping Center. The Company manages two fast food courts in Florida
consisting of five fast food facilities in Tampa, Florida and eight fast food facilities in Hollywood,
Florida, each at a Hard Rock Hotel and Casino operated by the Seminole Indian Tribe at these
locations. In Atlantic City, New Jersey, the Company operates a restaurant and a bar in the Resorts
Atlantic City Hotel and Casino. In Boston, Massachusetts, the Company operates a restaurant in the
Faneuil Hall Marketplace.

Accounting Period—The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest September 30. The

fiscal years ended September 29, 2007, September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 included 52 weeks.

Significant Estimates—In the process of preparing its consolidated financial statements,
the
Company estimates the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and liabilities which are not readily
apparent from other sources. The primary estimates underlying the Company’s financial statements
include allowances for potential bad debts on receivables, the useful lives and recoverability of its
assets, such as property and intangibles,
instruments and share-based
financial
compensation, the realizable value of its tax assets and other matters.

fair values of

Principles of Consolidation—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and all of its wholly owned subsidiaries, partnerships and other entities in which it has a
controlling interest. Also included in the consolidated condensed financial statements are certain
variable interest entities, as discussed below. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications—Certain reclassifications of prior year balances have been made to conform to
the current year presentation. In connection with the planned or actual sale or closure of various
restaurants, the operations of these businesses have been presented as discontinued operations in the
the Company has reclassified its statements of
consolidated financial statements. Accordingly,
operations and cash flow data for the prior periods presented,
in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”). These dispositions are discussed below in “Recent Restaurant
Dispositions.”

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—In June 2005,

the Emerging Issues Task Force
(“EITF”) issued EITF No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a
Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain
Rights” (“EITF 04-5”). EITF 04-5 presumes that a general partner controls a limited partnership and
therefore should consolidate the partnership. This presumption can be overcome of the limited partners
have kick-out or substantive participating rights. EITF 04-5 was effective for the Company’s quarter
ended December 30, 2006 and accordingly management has made an assessment of the limited
partnership or similar entities that the Company provides management services to where it is also the
general partner in the entity that owns the property. Effective October 1, 2006 the Company
determined that one of its managed restaurants, El Rio Grande (“Rio”), should be presented on a
consolidated basis in accordance with EITF 04-5 and as a result included Rio in its consolidated

F-6

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 2

Job Seq: 23

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

63383

financial statements. The impact of such consolidation was not material to the Company’s consolidated
financial position or results of operations for any period presented.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents, which primarily consist of money market
funds, are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. For financial statement presentation purposes,
the Company considers all highly liquid investments having original maturities of three months or less
to be cash equivalents. Outstanding checks in excess of account balances, typically vendor payments,
payroll and other contractual obligations disbursed on or near the last day of a reporting period are
reported as a current liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company
maintains the majority of its cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions. Deposits
held with banks exceed insurance limits. These deposits may be redeemed upon demand and therefore
bear minimal risk.

Available-For-Sale Securities—Available-for-sale securities consist of United States Treasury Bills,
commercial paper, government bonds, corporate bonds and other fixed income securities, all of which
have a high degree of liquidity and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income. The cost of investments in available-for-sale securities is
determined on a specific identification basis. Realized gains or losses and declines in value judged to be
other than temporary, if any, are reported in other income, net. The Company evaluates its investments
periodically for possible impairment and reviews factors such as the length of time and extent to which
fair value has been below cost basis and the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a
period of time which may be sufficient for anticipated recovery in market value.

Accounts Receivable—Accounts receivable is primarily composed of normal business receivables

such as credit card receivables that are paid off in a short period of time.

Inventories—Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market, and consist of

food and beverages, merchandise for sale and other supplies.

Revenue Recognition—The Company-owned restaurant sales are composed almost entirely of food
and beverage sales. The Company records revenue at the time of the purchase of products by
customers.

Management fees, which are included in Revenues–Other Income, are related to the Company’s
managed restaurants and are based on either gross restaurant sales or cash flow. The Company
recognizes management fee income in the period sales are made or cash flow is generated.

The Company offers customers the opportunity to purchase gift certificates. At the time of
purchase by the customer, the Company records a gift certificate liability for the face value of the
certificate purchased. The Company recognizes the revenue and reduces the gift certificate liability
when the certificate is redeemed. The Company does not reduce its recorded liability for potential non-
use of purchased gift cards.

Fixed Assets—Leasehold improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the respective assets (three to seven years). Amortization of improvements to
leased properties is computed using the straight-line method based upon the initial term of the
applicable lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements, whichever is less, and ranges from 5
to 30 years. For leases with renewal periods at the Company’s option, if failure to exercise a renewal
option imposes an economic penalty to the Company, management may determine at the inception of
the lease that renewal is reasonably assured and include the renewal option period in the determination
of appropriate estimated useful lives.

The Company includes in construction in progress improvements in restaurants that are under
construction. Once the projects have been completed, the Company will begin depreciating and
amortizing the assets. Start-up costs incurred during the construction period of restaurants, including
rental of premises, training and payroll, are expensed as incurred.

The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which requires impairment losses to be recorded
on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted
cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the asset’s carrying amount. In the

F-7

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 3

Job Seq: 24

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

12017

evaluation of the fair value and future benefits of long-lived assets, the Company performs an analysis
of the anticipated undiscounted future net cash flows of the related long-lived assets. If the carrying
value of the related asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to its fair
value. Various factors including future sales growth and profit margins are included in this analysis.
Management believes at this time that carrying values and useful lives continue to be appropriate.

For the years ended September 29, 2007, September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, no impairment

charges were deemed necessary.

Intangible Assets, Goodwill and Trademarks—Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill,
trademarks, purchased leasehold rights and noncompete agreements. Trademarks acquired in
connection with the Durgin Park acquisition (see Note 2) are considered to have an indefinite life
and are not being amortized. As of September 29, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS
No. 142, Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This statement requires that for
goodwill, including the goodwill included in the carrying value of investments accounted for using the
equity method of accounting, and certain other intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite useful
life, the Company cease amortization. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets
be assessed for impairment using fair value measurement techniques. Specifically, goodwill impairment
is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is to identify
potential impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit (the Company is being treated as
one reporting unit) with its net book value (or carrying amount), including goodwill. If the fair value of
the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired
and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the
amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the
implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the
carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is
determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That
is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including
any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination
and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The
impairment test for other intangible assets consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible
asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

Determining the fair value of the reporting unit under the first step of the goodwill impairment test
and determining the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit (including
unrecognized intangible assets) under the second step of the goodwill impairment test is judgmental in
nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Similarly, estimates and
assumptions are used in determining the fair value of other intangible assets. These estimates and
assumptions could have a significant impact on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized and
also the magnitude of any such charge. To assist in the process of determining goodwill impairment, the
Company obtains appraisals from independent valuation firms. In addition to the use of independent
the Company performs internal valuation analyses and considers other market
valuation firms,
information that is publicly available. Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using discounted
cash flows, market comparisons and recent transactions. These approaches use significant estimates and
assumptions including projected future cash flows (including timing), a discount rate reflecting the risk
inherent in future cash flows, perpetual growth rate, determination of appropriate market comparables
and the determination of whether a premium or discount should be applied to comparables. Based on
the above policy, no impairment charges were recorded during the fiscal years ended 2007, 2006 and
2005.

Costs associated with acquiring leases and subleases, principally purchased leasehold rights, have
been capitalized and are being amortized on the straight-line method based upon the initial terms of the
applicable lease agreements, which range from 9 to 20 years.

F-8

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 4

Job Seq: 25

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

96361

Covenants not to compete arising from restaurant acquisitions are amortized over the contractual

period, typically five years.

Amortization expense for intangible assets not including goodwill was $20,000, $29,000 and $28,000

for fiscal years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Leases—The Company is obligated under various lease agreements for certain restaurants. The
Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term, including option
periods as described below. Within the provisions of certain leases there are escalations in payments
over the base lease term, as well as renewal periods. The effects of the escalations have been reflected
in rent expense on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term, which includes option periods
when it is deemed to be reasonably assured that the Company would incur an economic penalty for not
exercising the option. Percentage rent expense is generally based upon sales levels and is expensed as
incurred. Certain leases include both base rent and percentage rent. The Company records rent expense
on these leases based upon reasonably assured sales levels. The consolidated financial statements reflect
the same lease terms for amortizing leasehold improvements as were used in calculating straight-line
rent expense for each restaurant. The judgments of the Company may produce materially different
amounts of amortization and rent expense than would be reported if different lease terms were used.

Operating Lease Deferred Credit—Several of the Company’s operating leases contain predeter-
mined increases in the rentals payable during the term of such leases. For these leases, the aggregate
rental expense over the lease term is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The excess
of the expense charged to operations in any year and amounts payable under the leases during that year
are recorded as deferred credits that reverse over the lease term.

Occupancy Expenses—Occupancy expenses include rent, rent taxes, real estate taxes, insurance and

utility costs.

Income Taxes—Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to the temporary
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in tax rates is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Income Per Share of Common Stock—Basic net income per share is computed in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 128, Earnings Per Share, and is calculated
on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted
net income per share reflects the additional dilutive effect of potentially dilutive shares (principally
those arising from the assumed exercise of stock options).

Share-based Compensation—Effective October 2, 2005,

the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), and related
interpretations and began expensing the grant-date fair value of employee stock options. Prior to
October 2, 2005, the Company applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans.
Accordingly, prior to October 2, 2005, no compensation expense has been recognized for employee
stock options, as options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of grant. Upon adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company elected to value
employee stock options using the Black-Scholes option valuation method that uses assumptions that
relate to the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock, the expected dividend yield of our
stock, the expected life of the options and the risk free interest rate. The assumptions used for the
options granted on December 21, 2004, which were unvested at the time of the adoption of SFAS 123R,
included a risk free interest rate of 3.37%, volatility of 37%, a dividend yield of 3% and an expected life
of three years.

F-9

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 5

Job Seq: 26

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

31055

On October 2, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition
method and therefore has not restated prior periods. Under this transition method, compensation cost
associated with employee stock options recognized during fiscal 2006 includes amortization related to
the remaining unvested portion of stock awards granted prior to October 2, 2005. During fiscal year
2007, the Company granted options to purchase 105,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$32.15. No options were granted during fiscal year 2006.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company presented tax benefits resulting from share-
based compensation as operating cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows. SFAS 123R
requires that cash flows resulting from tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized in the
financial statements be classified as an operating cash outflow and a financing cash inflow.

Compensation cost charged to operations for the fiscal years ended 2007 and 2006 for share-based
compensation programs was $408,000 and $748,000, before tax benefits of $139,000 and $256,000,
respectively. The compensation cost recognized is classified as payroll expense in the consolidated
statements of operations.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123R-3 “Transition Election
Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards” (“FAS 123R-3”). The
Company has elected to adopt the alternative transition method provided in this FASB Staff Position
for calculating the tax effects of share-based compensation pursuant to FAS 123R-3. The alternative
transition method includes a simplified method to establish the beginning balance of the additional
paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the effects of employee share-based compensation, which is
available to absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123R.

A summary of stock option activity is presented below:

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Fair
Value

Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term (Yrs.)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Options

Outstanding as September 30, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding at September 29, 2007. . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares

202,000
105,000
(35,500)
271,500

$28.68
$32.15
$24.25
$30.59

$ 8.06
$10.94
$ 6.76
$ 9.22

Exercisable at September 29, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . .

166,500

$29.60

$ 8.13

7.91
9.23
—
8.01

7.23

$1,695,195

$1,203,795

Had the Company accounted for its share-based awards under the fair value method for the fiscal

year ended October 1, 2005 the impact on its financial statements would have been as follows:

Net income as reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deduct share-based compensation expense computed under the
fair value method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income—pro forma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net income per share as reported—basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income per share as reported—diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income per share pro forma—basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income per share pro forma—diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended
October 1, 2005
(In thousands, except
per share amounts)
$6,579

494
$6,085

$ 1.92
$ 1.85
$ 1.77
$ 1.71

As of September 29, 2007, there was approximately $846,000 of unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately
three years.

The Company, generally, issues new shares upon the exercise of employee stock options.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements—In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes–an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”
(“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial

F-10

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 6

Job Seq: 27

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

40330

statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of FIN 48 during fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on
its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), “Fair Value
Measurements.” SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
all financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is
currently assessing the impact of SFAS 157 on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities–including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159
permits entities to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.
Upon adoption of SFAS 159, an entity may elect the fair value option for eligible items that exist at the
adoption date. Subsequent to the initial adoption, the election of the fair value option should only be
made at initial recognition of the asset or liability or upon a remeasurement event that gives rise to
new-basis accounting. SFAS 159 does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain
assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value nor does it eliminate disclosure requirements included in
other accounting standards. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial position and
results of operations.

On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS
141(R)”), and SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an
amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). These new standards will significantly change the
accounting for and reporting for business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority)
interests in consolidated financial statements. SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160 are required to be adopted
simultaneously and are effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 141(R)
and SFAS 160 on our consolidated financial statements.

2. Acquisition

On January 8, 2007, the Company acquired the operating assets and leasehold for the Durgin Park
Restaurant and the Black Horse Tavern in Boston, Massachusetts for $2,000,000 in cash and a $1,000,000
five year promissory note bearing interest at a rate of 7% per year.

The following summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired at the acquisition date:

Fixed Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademarks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Purchase Price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 513
721
1,766
$3,000

The difference between the aggregate purchase price and fair value of the assets acquired has been

recorded as goodwill and trademarks based on a valuation of the assets acquired.

Unaudited pro forma financial

information has not been presented as it has been deemed

immaterial to the financial position, results of operations and cash flows by management.

3. Recent Restaurant Dispositions

In November 2000 the Company entered into a sale and leaseback agreement to refinance the
purchase of various restaurant equipment at its food and beverage facilities at Desert Passage, the retail

F-11

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 7

Job Seq: 28

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

14375

complex at the Aladdin Resort & Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. In 2002, the operations at the Aladdin
were abandoned. During fiscal 2006 the Company made an unprovided for lump sum payment of
$142,000 due under this lease which is included in discontinued operations for fiscal year 2006.

The Company’s bar/nightclub facility Venus, located at the Venetian Casino Resort, experienced a
steady decline in sales and the Company felt that a new concept was needed at this location. During the
first quarter of 2005, this bar/nightclub facility was closed for re-concepting and re-opened as “Vivid”
on February 4, 2005. Total conversion costs were approximately $400,000. Sales at
the new
bar/nightclub facility failed to reach the level sufficient to achieve the results the Company required.
As of December 31, 2005, the Company classified the assets and liabilities of this facility as “held for
sale” in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”) based on the fact that the facility has met
the criteria for such under SFAS 144. The Company recorded impairment charges of $571,000 during
fiscal 2007 as a result of the sale of this facility. The Company recorded net operating losses of $188,000
and $486,000 for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively. The
impairment charges and operating losses are included in discontinued operations.

On July 6, 2006, the landlord for the Vico’s Burrito’s fast food facility at the Venetian Casino
Resort notified the Company that they were exercising their option to terminate the lease in exchange
the non-removable
for the landlord providing the Company with the unamortized portion of
improvements located in the facility. On August 10, 2006, the Company entered into a letter
agreement pursuant to which the landlord agreed to pay $200,000 for the unamortized portion of the
non-removable improvements located in the facility. The Company realized a loss on the closure of this
restaurant of $70,000 which is included in discontinued operations. Operating income of $35,000 and
operating losses of $425,000 is included in discontinued operations for the fiscal years ended
September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.

During 2006, the Company was approached by the Venetian Casino Resort who indicated that, due
to the expansion of the Grand Canal Shoppes, the Company’s Lutece and Tsunami locations, as well as
a portion of the Company’s Vivid location, in the Grand Canal Shoppes were desired by other tenants.
The Venetian Casino Resort offered to purchase these locations from the Company for an aggregate of
$14,000,000. After evaluating the offer, the Company determined that such offer made it advantageous
for the Company to redeploy these assets. Effective December 1, 2006, the Company’s subsidiaries that
leased each of Lutece, Tsunami and Vivid locations at the Venetian Resort Hotel Casino in Las Vegas,
Nevada, entered into an agreement to sell Lutece, Tsunami and a portion of the Vivid location used by
Lutece as a prep kitchen to Venetian Casino Resort, LLC for an aggregate of $14,000,000. The
Company’s Lutece location closed on December 3, 2006 and the Company’s Tsunami location closed on
January 3, 2007. The Company realized a gain of $7,814,000 ($5,196,000 after taxes, or $1.45 per share)
on the sale of these facilities. In addition, the gain was reduced by an allocation of goodwill in the
amount of $100,000. The Company recorded operating income of $34,000 and losses of $425,000 fiscal
years of 2007 and 2006, respectively, for both facilities. The gain on sale and losses are included in
discontinued operations.

In accordance with SFAS 144, all prior years included in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations and cash flows have been reclassified to separately show the results of operations and cash
flows of discontinued operations. Total revenues of discontinued operations were $2,686,000, $6,609,000
and $10,190,000 in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

F-12

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 8

Job Seq: 29

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

61483

4. Investment Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses, and fair value

of available-for-sale securities by major type and class at September 29, 2007 are as follows:

Amortized
Cost

Gross Unrealized
Holding Gains

Gross Unrealized
Holding Losses

Fair Value

At September 29, 2007
Available for sales short-term:

Government debt securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

At September 29, 2007
Available for sales long-term:

Corporate debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,130
5,427

$8,557

$ 595
$ 595

$14
35

$49

$—
$—

$—
—

$—

$—
$—

$3,144
5,462

$8,606

$ 595
$ 595

5. Long-Term Receivables

Long-term receivables consist of the following:

Note receivable collateralized by fixed assets and lease
at a restaurant sold by the Company, at 8% interest;
due in monthly installments through December
2006 (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note receivable collateralized by fixed assets and lease

at a restaurant sold by the Company, at 7.5%
interest; due in monthly installments through
December 2008 (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note receivable collateralized by fixed assets and lease
at a restaurant sold by the Company, at 6% interest,
due in monthly installments through June 2011 (c) . . .

Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

(In thousands)

$ —

$

23

—

558

466

466
114

$352

575

1,156
131

$1,025

(a) In December 1996, the Company sold a restaurant for $900,000. Cash of $50,000 was received on

sale and the balance was paid in full during fiscal 2007.

(b) In October 1997, the Company sold a restaurant for $1,750,000, of which $200,000 was paid in cash
and the balance was due in monthly installments under the terms of two notes bearing interest at
7.5%. One note, with an initial principal balance of $400,000, was paid in 24 monthly installments of
$19,000 through April 2000. The second note, with an initial principal balance of $1,150,000, was
paid in full during fiscal 2007.

(c) In March 2005, the Company sold a restaurant for $1,300,000. Cash of $600,000 was included on the
sale. Of the $600,000 cash, $200,000 was paid to the Company as a fee to manage the restaurant for
four months prior to closure and the balance was paid directly to the landlord. The remaining
$700,000 was received in the form of a note payable in installments through June 2011. The
Company recognized a gain of $644,000 during the year ended October 1, 2005 in connection with
this sale.

The carrying value of the Company’s long-term receivables approximates their current aggregate

fair value.

F-13

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 9

Job Seq: 30

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

30362

6. Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following:

Purchased leasehold rights (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncompete agreements and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less accumulated amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

(In thousands)

$2,377
412
2,789
2,709

$

80

$490
483
973
873

$100

(a) Purchased leasehold rights arise from acquiring leases and subleases of various restaurants.

7. Goodwill and Trademarks

is not presently amortized but

Goodwill is the excess of cost over fair market value of tangible and intangible net assets acquired.
Goodwill
tested for impairment annually or when the facts or
circumstances indicate a possible impairment of goodwill as a result of a continual decline in
performance or as a result of fundamental changes in a market in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Trademarks, which have indefinite lives, are not currently
amortized and are tested for impairment annually or when facts or circumstances indicate a possible
impairment as a result of a continual decline in performance or as a result of fundamental changes in a
market.

8. Other Assets

Other assets consist of the following:

Deposits and other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landlord receivable (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

(In thousands)

$316
—
$316

$465
380
$845

(a) This balance represents certain costs paid by the Company on behalf of a landlord, which under an
agreement with the landlord was to be used as a future offset to contingent rent payments for
certain Las Vegas restaurants. The balance was written off in connection with the sale of these
restaurants.

9. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

Sales tax payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued wages and payroll related costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer advance deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-14

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

(In thousands)

$ 694
1,355
1,666
1,788

$5,503

$ 696
1,094
1,120
1,308

$4,218

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 10

Job Seq: 31

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

16841

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases—The Company leases its restaurants, bar facilities, and administrative headquarters through
its subsidiaries under terms expiring at various dates through 2021. Most of the leases provide for the
payment of base rents plus real estate taxes, insurance and other expenses and, in certain instances, for
the payment of a percentage of the restaurants’ sales in excess of stipulated amounts at such facility.

As of September 29, 2007, future minimum lease payments under noncancelable leases are as

follows:

Fiscal Year

2008. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2009. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total minimum payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Amount
(In thousands)
$ 5,837
5,231
4,907
4,993
6,243
13,455
$40,666

In connection with certain of the leases included in the table above, the Company obtained and
delivered irrevocable letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $466,000 as security deposits under
such leases.

Rent expense was $12,408,000, $12,299,000 and $11,978,000 during the fiscal years ended
September 29, 2007, September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. Contingent rentals,
included in rent expense, were $4,353,000, $4,392,000, and $4,160,000 for the fiscal years ended
September 29, 2007, September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively.

In August 2004, the Company entered into a lease agreement to operate a Gallagher’s Steakhouse
and separate bar, Luna Lounge, at the Resorts International Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, New
Jersey. In connection with this lease the landlord contributed $3,000,000 towards the construction of
these facilities. The Company received the $3,000,000 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
As a result of cost overruns the landlord provided the Company with a rent credit which totaled
$500,000. These amounts are included in the Operating Lease Deferred Credit Liability and are
credited to income over the remaining life of the related lease on a straight-line basis.

In September 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to lease space for a Mexican
restaurant, Yolos, at the Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino (formerly known as the Aladdin Resort
and Casino) in Las Vegas, Nevada. Lease payments do not commence until construction of this
restaurant is completed. This restaurant is expected to open during the first fiscal quarter of 2008.

The future minimum lease payments from the above noted leases are included in the above

schedule.

Legal Proceedings—In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is a party to various
lawsuits arising from accidents at its restaurants and worker’s compensation claims, which are generally
handled by the Company’s insurance carriers.

The employment by the Company of management personnel, waiters, waitresses and kitchen staff
at a number of different restaurants has resulted in the institution, from time to time, of litigation
alleging violation by the Company of employment discrimination laws. The Company does not believe
that any of such suits will have a materially adverse effect upon the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.

Other—The Company’s tax return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 is currently under
audit by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company’s tax returns for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 are currently under audit by New York State. The Company
expects no material adjustments will result from these examinations.

F-15

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 11

Job Seq: 32

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

55712

11. Common Stock Repurchase Plan

In August 2006, the Company authorized the repurchase of up to $4,000,000 of the Company’s
outstanding common stock which may be acquired in open market purchases over the twelve months
following the date of the authorization. For the fiscal years ended September 29, 2007 and September
30, 2006, there were no repurchases of common stock.

12. Stock Options

The Company has options outstanding under two stock option plans, the 1996 Stock Option Plan
(the “1996 Plan) and the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “2004 Plan”). In 2004 the Company terminated
the 1996 Plan. This action terminated the 257,000 authorized but unissued options under the 1996 Plan
but it did not affect any of the options previously issued under the 1996 Plan.

Options granted under the 1996 Plan are exercisable at prices at least equal to the fair market
value of such stock on the dates the options were granted. The options expire five years after the date
of grant and are generally exercisable as to 25% of the shares commencing on the first anniversary of
the date of grant and as to an additional 25% commencing on each of the second, third and fourth
anniversaries of the grant date.

Options granted under the 2004 Plan are exercisable at prices at least equal to the fair market
value of such stock on the dates the options were granted. The options expire ten years after the date of
grant. During fiscal 2005, options to purchase 194,000 shares of common stock were granted and are
exercisable as to 50% of the shares commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and as to
an additional 50% commencing on the second anniversary of the date of grant. During fiscal 2007,
options to purchase 105,000 shares of common stock were granted and are exercisable as to 25% of the
shares commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and as to an additional 25%
commencing on each of the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

Additional information as of the end of each respective fiscal year is as follows:

Outstanding, beginning of year . . . .
Options:

Granted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled or expired . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding, end of year (a) . . . . . .

2007

2006

2005

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Shares

Shares

202,000 $28.68

301,000 $ 21.32

178,000 $ 7.91

105,000
(35,500)
—

271,500

32.15
24.35
—

30.59

—
(99,000)
—

—
6.30

194,000
(71,000)

29.60
6.47

202,000

28.68

301,000

21.32

Exercise price, outstanding options $29.60–32.15
Weighted average years . . . . . . . . . . .
8.01 Years
Shares available for future

$ 6.30–29.60
7.91 Years

$ 6.30–29.60
6.38 Years

grant (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Options exercisable (a) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of options granted. . . . . .

151,000
166,500
105,000

29.60
10.94

256,000
105,000

27.82
— 194,000

256,000
107,000
8.13

6.30

(a) Options become exercisable at various times expiring through 2016.

(b) The 2004 Stock Option Plan, which was approved by shareholders, is the Company’s only equity
compensation plan currently in effect. Under the 2004 Stock Option Plan, 450,000 options were
authorized for future grant and 194,000 of these options were issued during fiscal 2005. During
fiscal 2007, the Company issued an additional 105,000 of these options. The Company, with the
approval of the shareholders, terminated the 1996 Stock option Plan. This action terminated the
257,000 authorized but unissued options under the 1996 Stock Option Plan but it did not affect any
of the options previously issued under the 1996 Stock Option Plan.

F-16

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 12

Job Seq: 33

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

27854

13. Management Fee Income

As of September 29, 2007, the Company provides management services to two fast food courts and
two restaurants it does not own. In accordance with the contractual arrangements, the Company earns
management fees based on gross sales or cash flow as defined by the agreements. Management fee
income relating to these services was $1,929,000, $1,980,000 and $1,568,000 for the years ended
September 29, 2007, September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. Such amount for the year
ended September 29, 2007 included $629,000 for management
fees and $1,300,000 for profit
distributions. Such amount for the year ended September 30, 2006 included $932,000 for management
fees and $1,048,000 for profit distributions. Such amount for the year ended October 1, 2005 included
$851,000 for management fees and $717,000 for profit distributions.

Receivables from managed restaurants, classified as Related Party receivable in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets, were $1,318,000 and $1,446,000 at September 29, 2007 and September 30,
2006, respectively. Such amount at September 29, 2007 included $206,000 for management fees and
$1,112,000 for expense advances. Such amount at September 30, 2006 included $161,000 for
management fees, $250,000 for profit distributions and $1,035,000 for expense advances.

Managed restaurants had sales of $20,514,000, $16,377,000 and $12,105,000 during the management
periods within the years ended September 29, 2007, September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005,
respectively, which are not included in consolidated net sales of the Company.

14. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes reflects Federal income taxes calculated on a consolidated basis and
state and local income taxes calculated by each subsidiary on a nonconsolidated basis. For state and
local
income tax purposes, the losses incurred by a subsidiary may only be used to offset that
subsidiary’s income.

The provision (benefit) for income taxes attributable to continuing and discontinued operations

consists of the following:

Current provision:

Federal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Deferred provision (benefit):

Federal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

October 1,
2005

(In thousands)

$4,579
213

4,792

1,166
376

1,542
$6,334

$2,985
603

3,588

(967)
(29)

(996)
$2,592

$2,189
569

2,758

413
(226)

187
$2,945

The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the Federal

statutory rate due to the following

Provision at Federal statutory rate (35% in 2007 and 34% in

2006 and 2005) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local income taxes net of Federal tax benefit . . . . . . .
Tax credits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local net operating loss carryforward allowance

adjustment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

October 1,
2005

(In thousands)

$6,845
341
(819)

27
(60)

$2,656
502
(484)

(134)
52

$3,238
309
(514)

(125)
37

$6,334

$2,592

$2,945

F-17

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 13

Job Seq: 34

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

74082

Deferred tax assets or liabilities are established for: (a) temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax
purposes, and (b) operating loss carryforwards. The tax effects of items comprising the Company’s net
deferred tax asset are as follows:

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

(In thousands)

Long-term deferred tax assets (liabilities):

Operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating lease deferred credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Carryforward tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred gains. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension withdrawal liability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total long-term net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,330
1,497
777
(44)
(266)
(252)
632
89
4,763

$4,763

$2,513
1,407
2,574
53
(416)
(224)
284
114
6,305

$6,305

A valuation allowance for deferred taxes is required if, based on the evidence, it is more likely than
not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company believes that uncertainty
exists with respect to future realization of certain operating loss carryforwards, related to state taxes,
and operating lease deferred credits. Therefore, the Company provided a valuation allowance of
$252,000 and $224,000 at September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively. The Company
decreased its allowance for the utilization of the deferred tax asset arising from state and local
operating loss carryforwards by $134,000 and $125,000 for the years ended September 30, 2006 and
October 1, 2005, respectively, based on the merger of certain unprofitable subsidiaries into profitable
ones. The Company has state operating loss carryforwards of $19,576,000, which expire in the years
2007 through 2020.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, the Company agreed to a settlement with the
Internal Revenue Service which covered fiscal years ended October 2, 1999 through October 2, 2004.
The final adjustments primarily related to the timing of deductions made during the fiscal year ended
September 28, 2003 relating to the abandonment of the Company’s restaurant and food court
operations at Desert Passage which adjoins the Aladdin Casino Resort in Las Vegas, Nevada. This
settlement did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition.

15. Other Income

Other income consists of the following:

Purchasing service fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16. Income Per Share of Common Stock

Years Ended

September 29,
2007

September 30,
2006

October 1,
2005

$ 76
729

$805

(In thousands)

$ 60
654

$714

$ 41
631

$672

A reconciliation of

the basic and diluted per share
computations for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2007, September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005
follows:

the numerators and denominators of

F-18

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 14

Job Seq: 35

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

51363

Net
Income
(Numerator)

Per-Share
Amount
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Shares
(Denominator)

Year ended September 29, 2007:

Basic EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended September 30, 2006:

Basic EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended October 1, 2005:

Basic EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$13,013
—

$13,013

$ 5,220
—

$ 5,220

$ 6,579
—
$ 6,579

3,582
25

3,607

3,472
76

3,548

3,436
119
3,555

$ 3.63
(0.02)

$ 3.61

$ 1.50
(0.03)

$ 1.47

$ 1.92
(0.07)
$ 1.85

For the fiscal years ended September 29, 2007 and October 1, 2005 all outstanding stock options
were included in the computation of diluted EPS. For the year ended September 30, 2006, stock options
for 194,000 shares were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have
been antidilutive.

17. Quarterly Information (Unaudited)

The following tables set forth certain unaudited results of operations for each quarter during 2007
and 2006. The unaudited information has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated
financial statements and includes all adjustments which management considers necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial data shown. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be attained for any future period. Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
are computed independently for each of the periods presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly
earnings (loss) per share may not agree to the total for the year.

The quarterly financial results for the fiscal quarter ended December 30, 2006 as presented, differ
from the Company’s previously filed 10Q as they do not separately disclose a cummulative effect of a
change in accounting principle. This amount is deemed immaterial to the financial statements and has
been included with income from continuing operations.

December 30,
2006

Fiscal Quarters Ended
March 31,
June 30,
2007
2007

September 29,
2007

(In thousands except per share amounts)

2007
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$28,202

$25,867

$36,064

$34,074

Income from continuing operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . .

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Per share information—basic and diluted:
Continuing operations basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,831
4,759

$ 6,590

$

0.51
1.33

Net basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1.84

Continuing operations diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

0.51
1.33

Net diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1.84

$

$

447
(69)

378

$ 3,520
(49)

$ 2,606
(32)

$ 3,471

$ 2,574

$ 0.13
(0.02)

$ 0.11

$ 0.12
(0.02)

$ 0.10

$

$

$

$

0.98
(0.01)

0.97

0.97
(0.01)

0.96

$

$

$

$

0.73
(0.01)

0.72

0.72
(0.01)

0.71

F-19

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846I;006

Seq: 15

Job Seq: 36

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:49

15310

2006
Revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$25,963

$24,120

$31,085

$29,351

December 31,
2005

Fiscal Quarters Ended
April 1,
2006

July 1,
2006

September 30,
2006

(In thousands except per share amounts)

Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,307
(391)
916

$

$

124
(275)

$ 2,625
(137)
$ (151) $ 2,488

Per share information—basic and diluted:
Continuing operations basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 0.37
(0.11)

$

0.04
(0.08)

$

0.76
(0.04)

Net basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 0.26

$ (0.04) $

0.72

Continuing operations diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 0.37
(0.11)

$

0.04
(0.08)

$

0.74
(0.04)

Net diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 0.26

$ (0.04) $

0.70

$ 1,914
53
$ 1,967

$

$

$

$

0.55
0.01

0.56

0.54
0.01

0.55

18. Stock Option Receivables

Stock option receivables include amounts due from officers and directors totaling $166,000 at
September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006. Such amounts which are due from the exercise of stock
options in accordance with the Company’s Stock Option Plan are payable on demand with interest
(8.25% at September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006).

19. Related Party Transactions

Receivables due from officers and directors, excluding stock option receivables, totaled $37,000 at
September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006. Other employee loans totaled $279,000 at September 29,
2007 and $357,000 at September 30, 2006. Such loans bear interest at the minimum statutory rate
(4.88% at September 29, 2007 and 4.96% at September 30, 2006).

Receivables due from unconsolidated restaurants, totaled $1,318,000 net of an allowance of

$174,000 at September 29, 2007 and $1,446,000 with no allowance at September 30, 2006.

20. Subsequent Events

On December 1, 2007 the Company completed the sale of its Vivid facility at the Venetian Casino

Resort in Las Vegas, Nevada, for an aggregate of $1,120,000.

* * * * * *

F-20

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846J;008

Seq: 1

Job Seq: 3

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:41

46045

CORPORATE INFORMATION

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Michael Weinstein
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Robert Towers
President, Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer

Vincent Pascal
Senior Vice President—Operations and Secretary

Paul Gordon
Senior Vice President—Director of Las Vegas Operations

Marcia Allen
President, Allen & Associates

Bruce Lewin
President and Director, Continental Hosts, Ltd.

Steve Shulman
President, Managing Director, Hampton Group Inc.

Arthur Stainman
Senior Managing Director, First Manhattan Co.

Stephen Novick
Senior Advisor, Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies

EXECUTIVE OFFICE
85 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
(212) 206-8800

TRANSFER AGENT
Continental Stock Transfer
17 Battery Place
New York, NY 10004

AUDITORS
J.H. Cohn LLP
1212 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

Command Financial/R.S. Rosenbaum (212) 274-0070

Cust: ARK RESTAURANTS

Doc: ANNUAL REPORT

User: COURTNEY

Job: 51846-004

File: 51846J;008

Seq: 2

Job Seq: 4

Clean: 1

8-FEB-08

11:41

31618