AutoZone Annual Report 2018

FY2018 Annual Report · AutoZone

Loading PDF…

2018 ANNUAL REPORT

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement

Corporate Proﬁle
AutoZone,
is the nation’s leading retailer and a
Inc.
leading distributor of automotive replacement parts and
accessories in the United States. We began operations in
1979 and at August 25, 2018, operated 5,618 stores in the
United States and Puerto Rico; 564 in Mexico; and 20 in
Brazil. Each store carries an extensive product line for cars,
sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new
and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance
items, accessories and non-automotive products. Many
of our stores also have a commercial sales program that
provides commercial credit and prompt delivery of parts and
other products to local, regional and national repair garages,
dealers, service stations and public sector accounts.

We also sell the ALLDATA brand automotive diagnostic
and repair software through www.alldata.com and
www.alldatadiy.com. Additionally, we sell automotive
hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-
automotive products through www.autozone.com and
our commercial customers can make purchases through
www.autozonepro.com. We do not derive revenue from
automotive repair or installation services.

• 6,202 stores (5,618 stores in 50 states, the

District of Columbia and Puerto Rico in the U.S.,
564 in Mexico, 20 in Brazil)

• 4,741 domestic Commercial programs

• 12 Distribution centers

(10 in the United States and 2 in Mexico)

• Approximately 90,000 AutoZoners

Selected Financial Highlights

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

Net Sales

Operating Proﬁt

Diluted Earnings per Share

After-TaxTT Return on Invested Capital

Domestic Same Store Sales Growth

Operating Margin

Cash Flow from Operations

2014

$9,475

$1,830

$31.57

32.1%

2.8 %

19.3 %

$1,365

2015

2016

$10,187

$10,636

$1,953

$36.03

31.2%

3.8 %

19.2 %

$1,573

$2,060

$40.70

31.3%

2.4%

19.4%

$1,641

2017

$10,889

$2,080

$44.07

29.9%

0.5%

19.1%

$1,571

2018

$11,221

$1,811

$48.77

32.1%

1.8%

16.1%

$2,080

AutoZone’s Pledge, est. 1986

AutoZoners always put customers ﬁrst!
We know our parts and products.
Our stores look great!
We’ve got the best merchandise at the right price.

Dear Customers, AutoZoners and Stockholders,

I want to thank all AutoZoners across the company for their hard work, dedication and commitment to Customer

Satisfaction this year and every year. And, while our sales performance improved in ﬁscal 2018, we certainly felt

there were ample opportunities to perform even better. I remain encouraged by the health of the consumer, the

health of our industry and the health of our business. And, I remain bullish on our business for ﬁscal 2019 and

beyond. Our teams continue to make good progress on initiatives that are aimed at improving our ability to say

YES to customers’ requests for parts and products more frequently, drive trafﬁc to our stores and websites and

accelerate our Commercial business.

Our largest business, U.S. Retail, is improving. Growth rebounded nicely from ﬁscal 2017, and I am optimistic

about our prospects in ﬁscal 2019. And, our U.S. Commercial business growth is accelerating. Commercial grew

7.3% in ﬁscal 2018 versus 5.7% the year before. The more promising statistic is fourth quarter ﬁscal 2018

Commercial sales grew 8.8%. I am very enthusiastic about Commercial growth going forward.

We now have 6,202 stores in three countries, and 84% of our U.S. stores have a Commercial program. And, every

store in Mexico and Brazil services Commercial customers. We continue to enhance the local market inventory

availability by building, relocating or expanding existing facilities, and ended the year with 170 regular hub stores

and 24 mega hubs. Additionally, a new distribution center was opened in Ocala, Florida and the Danville, Illinois

distribution center went through a major expansion and nearly doubled in size.

Also, our new, highly innovative, Next Day Delivery Program was announced. This unique offering allows over

80% of U.S. consumers to purchase as many as 100,000 parts or products via autozone.com as late at 10 p.m.

and have them delivered to their doorstep the very next day! This is the latest innovation from our team to build a

tremendous Omni-Channel offering for our customers to meet them when, where, and how they want to be met.

Summary of 2018 Results

During FY 2018, there were many successes. We reached a
record $11.2 billion in sales, with domestic same store sales
up 1.8% over ﬁscal 2017, and the company delivered a record
$48.77 in earnings per share, up 10.7% over ﬁscal 2017.

We opened 199 net new stores with 153 in the United States, 40
in Mexico and six in Brazil. Additionally, 149 net new Commercial
programs were opened in the U.S., ending the year with
Commercial programs in 84% of our domestic store base and
eight additional hub stores opened ﬁnishing the ﬁscal year with
194 hubs, including 24 mega hubs. And, our online offerings
and functionality at autozone.com and autozonepro.com were
signiﬁcantly expanded and improved.

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) was 32.1% for ﬁscal 2018,
$2.1 billion was generated in Operating Cash Flow, and a record
$1.6 billion in company shares were repurchased.

This success is directly attributable to approximately 90,000
great AutoZoners and their passion, dedication and commitment
to living our Pledge and Values and leveraging our unique and
powerful culture. I am so looking forward to 2019!

As mentioned at the outset, we also didn’t ﬁre on all cylinders in
ﬁscal 2018. After accelerating our market share growth in the
ﬁrst half of the year, we encountered some challenges in the
second half, and our market share gains subsided. In February
2018, we decided to cease our on-line only promotions as
we were concerned about potential current or future “channel
conﬂict” by having different pricing on ship to home merchandise
versus in-store purchases. Additionally, we had numerous
merchandise category changeovers, and several of them weren’t
executed to our standards, resulting in lower than acceptable

in-stock positions. And, with the opening of two new distribution
centers over 15 months while expanding another and ﬁnalizing
our frequency of delivery testing, our supply chain went through
a tremendous amount of change. As of the beginning of ﬁscal
2019, most of these issues have been resolved and we believe we
are well positioned again to accelerate our market share growth.

Finally, from a ﬁnancial reporting perspective, we had several
“adjustments” or unusual items in our results for ﬁscal 2018.
Typically, we pride ourselves on very straight forward, easy to
understand ﬁnancial results, but that was not the case this year.
During ﬁscal 2018, we had two business units, AutoAnything
and Interamerican Motor Corporation (IMC) that were both
impaired and sold resulting in pre-tax impairment charges of
$193.2 million. We purchased both of the businesses over the
last several years in an attempt to expand our understanding of
other sectors of the automotive aftermarket and develop new
growth opportunities. In hindsight, those acquisitions weren’t the
right strategic decisions, because in both instances, they were
too small to provide meaningful growth for our company, and
they took time, resources and attention away from focusing on
our core. Secondly, as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of
2017 (Tax Reform), we revalued our deferred tax positions and
experienced a lower effective tax rate. Finally, during the ﬁscal
year, we terminated and liquidated our previously frozen pension
plans, resulting in a pre-tax charge of $130.3 million. We are
very pleased to have eliminated any future charges, volatility or
risks related to our pension plans. As we look to ﬁscal 2019,
we expect to return to our more typical straightforward ﬁnancial
results, although the year will include a “53rd” week during the
fourth quarter.

The Automotive Aftermarket Industry

AutoZone operates in a remarkable industry. The long term
resiliency of the automotive aftermarket is simply amazing.
According to research by the Auto Care Association there
will be plenty of vehicles to be serviced by our industry for
years to come.

New car sales are back to near record highs and, because
vehicles are made better and last longer, the U.S. ﬂeet will
grow by more than 10% over the next three years ending
with more than 290 million vehicles on the road by 2021. And
while the growth in average age of the ﬂeet will slow some,
it’s forecasted to be 11 years and 8 months next year. More
cars on the road, an aging ﬂeet, miles driven on the increase
and gas prices currently below $3 a gallon all add up to a
formula for a healthy automotive aftermarket industry.

This industry has one of the more robust and stable sales
growth charts of any industry I have ever seen, growing
about 4% annually in DIY and about 4.5% in Commercial for
decades. But admittedly, the industry faces more “headline”
risks today than I can ever recall. Namely – On-line Only
Retailers, Electric Vehicles (EVs), Autonomous Vehicles and
Ride Sharing.

We are well aware of each of these risks, and we continue
to monitor and study them quite closely. Regarding the
emergence of On-line Only Retailers over the last decade and
a half, clearly they have grown their importance and gained
share. But market participants are always emerging

and contracting. Our industry has seen tremendous competitive
changes over the last several decades including the signiﬁcant
reduction of “Mom and Pop” players and the addition of
Mass Merchants. Over time, we have been able to adapt our
strategies and offerings and have very effectively competed
and continued to gain share. Good competition only
makes the strong better. Regarding vehicle technological
innovation, we leverage many of our partnerships across the
automotive industry to understand vehicle technology trends,
forecasts and their potential implications to our business. As we
have been studying these since their emergence or for more
than a decade in the case of EVs, we have seen widely varying
forecasts on their adoption levels. Our opinion is some, if not all
of these will be factors at some level over the next many years
or decades, but our opinion, at this time, is due to the size and
average age of the vehicle park and our expectation on adoption
rates, we don’t see any of these vehicle technological innovations
having a meaningful impact on the automotive aftermarket or our
business for the foreseeable future.

In this age of technological innovation, things can change quickly
and we will continue to monitor developments closely and adapt
our operations and strategies appropriately. But, with some of
the “doomsday” projections regarding the future of our industry,
I’m reminded of AutoZone’s ﬁrst annual report in 1991. In that
very ﬁrst annual report, our team was trying to rebuke the myth
that “DIY” was dying. Here is an insert from that annual report
that we believe is instructive in today’s environment…

The Future of the DIY Market

Is the DIY market likely to disappear as technological advances make cars too complex

for even the most mechanically proﬁcient DIYers?

As Scieii ntitt ﬁcﬁﬁ Americii an put it: “The remarkable development in the automobile industry,
and the swift advances in automobile construction within recent years, have produced
unexpected and unforeseen conditions, and one of the most striking phases in the situation
is the lack of men trained to manage and care for the high-powered cars.”

U.UU S. NeNN wsww & WoWW rldll Repe ortrr , utt

nder the subtitle “No more do-it-yourself”, proclaimed:
“Current models…defy even the most dedicated do-it-yourself mechanics. Professional
service has become a necessity.”

Sounds like AutoZone ought to be worried…but for one thing: Scieii ntitt ﬁcﬁﬁ Americii an’s’
article was published in 1908, and since U.S. News & World Report declared the DIY
market dead in 1968, the Commerce Department estimates it has grown by more than
seven-fold. Our point is that people have been predicting the demise of the DIY market for
so long now that we are reminded of the statement that Mark Twain once made: “Reports
of my death are greatly exaggerated.”

1991 Annual Report

Our Future
Our Future

So, it’s hard to believe, but we are in FY 2019. So, what’s new? There are some new and exciting things on the horizon. Our FY 2019 operating theme “Drive For
Excellence” is all about leadership, ﬂawless execution and WOW! Customer Service! As previously mentioned, we embarked on a tremendous amount of change
in 2018 and didn’t execute at our typical high levels. Rest assured, we are all highly committed to returning to our motto of evolution over revolution with ﬂawless
execution. And, as we provide more tools to our AutoZoners and less administrative burdens, the execution at the customer level will also improve. We continue to
be intensely focused on having the parts and products customers demand closer to where they want them and easily accessible through a wide variety of methods.
We…AutoZoners must take care of customers like never before – if we don’t, somebody else will. We must provide the trustworthy advice that is a cornerstone of the
AutoZone customer experience. There are choices customers can make on where to shop, and that cannont be taken for granted. Every interaction is an opportunity
for a customer to be surprised and delighted. Conversely, an opportunity to disappoint a customer is an unacceptable outcome. The challenge for ﬁscal 2019 is to
keep improving customer service.

Fiscal 2019 is going to be a year of intense focus on the basics while continuing to enhance our tools and focus on growing our Commercial business where our share
is roughly three percent. Tax Reform has signiﬁcantly improved our already robust cash ﬂow characteristics. And, as we looked at our business preparing for 2019,
we made the decision to invest a portion of those Tax Reform proceeds in the future of our business. We have decided to invest in additional wage and beneﬁts for
our most tenured hourly AutoZoners who are customer facing. And, we are going to invest in technological improvements aimed at accelerating our growth across the
business but in particular, Commercial. We believe these investments will pay dividends for our business and our shareholders for years to come.

We have a proven, time-tested, solid business model that is built on delivering consistent ﬁnancial results, and we are committed to a similar future. We are optimistic
about our sales potential for ﬁscal 2019. We intend to continue to grow global new store square footage at an annual rate of about three percent, continue to grow our
Commercial sales at an accelerated rate, leverage our historically strong and now enhanced, due to Tax Reform, cash ﬂows to repurchase shares to grow our earnings
per share. But our primary goal is to continue to invest in our AutoZoners and initiatives that provide us with an appropriate return. As our ROIC, at 32.1%, is one of the
best in all of hardlines retailing, our commitment remains to be good stewards of capital because we understand the capital we deploy is your capital.

I want to thank all AutoZoners for their dedication and hard work in ﬁscal 2018. Over the years, the company’s success is entirely due to their consistent commitment
to going the extra mile to help their customers. They embrace the AutoZone culture and continue to provide our customers with an exceptional experience. I would
also like to thank the vendors for their ongoing commitment to our collective success. Additionally, I would like to thank you, our stockholders, for the conﬁdence you
have placed in our team by your decision to invest in AutoZone. We remain committed to managing your capital wisely, achieving an appropriate return on incremental
projects and returning excess cash through an orderly share repurchase program.

I would also like to take a moment to thank a few very special people who have meant a tremendous amount to our success for decades.

First Rod Halsell, Senior Vice President, Supply Chain, will be retiring after a stellar 33 year career. In his career, he started as a 16 year old part-timer and emerged as
a tremendously passionate leader who led many teams to incredible success. We wish Rod and his wife Barbara much happiness in their next chapter!

Second, Bill Graves, Executive Vice President, Mexico, Brazil and Store Development has decided to retire after 25 years of service. Bill served two amazing organizations
in his career – the United States Army and AutoZone, and both were very fortunate to have his steady hand at the helm. Bill’s ability to consistently deliver impressive
results has been amazing. We all wish Bill and his wife Jamie all the best in their new advertures!

Finally, and with tremendous gratitude, respect, admiration and love, we say thank you to the person who had the vision to create this amazing organization dedicated
to providing the motoring public with a new, trusted partner in maintaining and enhancing their vehicles. On July 4th, 1979, our Founder, Pitt Hyde and his team,
opened the very ﬁrst AutoZone in Forest City, Arkansas. After a lifetime in the family businesses and nearly 40 years of leading AutoZone, Pitt has decided to not stand
for reelection to our Board of Directors. Pitt will be sorely missed as a member of our Board but in his typical fashion, he has promised he is only a phone call away.
And, I promise to our stockholders, his phone will continue to ring frequently as he has been a tremendous leader, advisor, mentor, coach and friend to me and so many
other current, former and I’m sure future AutoZoners. Pitt, we can’t thank you enough for building this amazing organization, that because of you, we all have had the
honor of helping continue to nurture and grow. We do stand on the shoulders of giants, and we thank you for being our foundation for nearly 40 years! We wish you
and Barbara all the best, and we thank you both for your passionate leadership of AutoZone, Memphis and philanthropy all these years!

At AutoZone, we have a unique and powerful culture that Pitt and team developed in our earliest days that has been reﬁned over the years. We remain passionate
about our Pledge, Values, and culture to earn our customers’ business every day. I continue to believe our best days are ahead. Thank you for staying in the Zone with
us for all these years!

Sincerely,

Bill Rhodes
Chairman, President and CEO
Customer Satisfaction

e of annuall meetiing off stockhold
Notice of annual meeting of stockholders
and proxy statement

AUTOZONE, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
DECEMBER 19, 2018

P
r
o
x
y

What:

When:

Where:

Stockholders
will vote regarding:

Record Date:

Memphis, Tennessee
October 26, 2018

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

December 19, 2018, 8:00 a.m. Central Standard Time

J. R. Hyde III Store Support Center
123 South Front Street
Memphis, Tennessee

• Election of eleven directors

• Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm
for the 2019 fiscal year

• Advisory vote on executive compensation

• The transaction of other business that may be properly

brought before the meeting

Stockholders of record as of October 22, 2018, may vote
at the meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,

Kristen C. Wright
Secretary

We encourage you to vote by telephone or Internet, both of which are convenient,
cost-effective and reliable alternatives to returning your proxy card by mail.

P
r
o
x
y

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
About this Proxy Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Information about Voting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate Governance Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Board Leadership Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Board Risk Oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate Governance Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Meetings and Attendance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Committees of the Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audit Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audit Committee Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Director Nomination Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Procedure for Communication with the Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Management and Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Proposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nominees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROPOSAL 2 – Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROPOSAL 3 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Discussion and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Committee Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Program Risk Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary Compensation Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Grants of Plan-Based Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Option Exercises and Stock Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Ratio of the Annual Total Compensation of the Median-Paid Employee to the CEO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Related Party Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity Compensation Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholder Proposals for 2019 Annual Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annual Report

Page

1
1
1
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
8
8
9
10
11
13
13
14
15
15
16
18
19
20
20
20
30
31
31
32
34
37
39
39
40
42
45
45
46
47
47
47

AutoZone, Inc.
123 South Front Street
Memphis, Tennessee 38103
Proxy Statement
for
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
December 19, 2018

The Meeting

P
r
o
x
y

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of AutoZone, Inc. will be held at AutoZone’s offices, the J. R. Hyde

III Store Support Center, 123 South Front Street, Memphis, Tennessee, at 8:00 a.m. CST on December 19, 2018.

About this Proxy Statement

Our Board of Directors has sent you this Proxy Statement to solicit your vote at the Annual Meeting. This
Proxy Statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters
brought before the Meeting. Please read it carefully.

In this Proxy Statement:

• “AutoZone,” “we,” “us,” and “the Company” mean AutoZone, Inc.

• “Annual Meeting” or “Meeting” means the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on December 19,
2018, at 8:00 a.m. CST at the J. R. Hyde III Store Support Center, 123 South Front Street, Memphis,
Tennessee.

• “Board” means the Board of Directors of AutoZone, Inc.

AutoZone will pay all expenses incurred in this proxy solicitation. We also may make additional

solicitations in person, by telephone, facsimile, e-mail, or other forms of communication. Brokers, banks, and
others who hold our stock for beneficial owners will be reimbursed by us for their expenses related to
forwarding our proxy materials to the beneficial owners.

This Proxy Statement is first being sent or given to security holders on or about October 26, 2018.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR
THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 19, 2018. This Proxy Statement and
the annual report to security holders are available at www.autozoneinc.com.

Information about Voting

What matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

1. to elect eleven directors;

2. to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting

firm for the 2019 fiscal year; and

3. to approve an advisory vote on executive compensation.

Stockholders also will transact any other business that may be properly brought before the Meeting.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

The record date for the Annual Meeting is October 22, 2018. Only stockholders of record at the close of
business on that date are entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. The only class of stock that can be
voted at the Meeting is our common stock. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters
that come before the Meeting. At the close of business on the record date, October 22, 2018, we had 25,559,353
shares of common stock outstanding.

P
r
o
x
y

How do I vote my shares?

You may vote your shares in person or by proxy:

By Proxy: You can vote by telephone, on the Internet or by mail. We encourage you to vote by
telephone or Internet, both of which are convenient, cost-effective, and reliable alternatives to returning
your proxy card by mail.

1. By Telephone: You may submit your voting instructions by telephone by following the

instructions printed on the enclosed proxy card. If you submit your voting instructions by telephone, you do
not have to mail in your proxy card.

2. On the Internet: You may vote on the Internet by following the instructions printed on the

enclosed proxy card. If you vote on the Internet, you do not have to mail in your proxy card.

3. By Mail:

If you properly complete and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it in the enclosed

envelope, it will be voted in accordance with your instructions. The enclosed envelope requires no
additional postage if mailed in the United States.

In Person: You may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. If you are a registered holder of

your shares (if you hold your stock in your own name), you need only to attend the Meeting. However, if
your shares are held in an account by a broker, you will need to present a written consent from your broker
permitting you to vote the shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

How will my vote be counted?

Your vote for your shares will be cast as you indicate on your proxy card. If you sign your card without
indicating how you wish to vote, your shares will be voted FOR our nominees for director, FOR Ernst & Young
LLP as independent registered public accounting firm, FOR the advisory vote on executive compensation, and
in the proxies’ discretion on any other matter that may properly be brought before the Meeting or any
adjournment of the Meeting.

The votes will be tabulated and certified by our transfer agent, Computershare. A representative of

Computershare will serve as the inspector of election.

Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy?

Yes, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Meeting by:

• giving written notice to our Secretary that you have revoked the proxy, or

• providing a later-dated proxy.

Any written notice should be sent to the Secretary at 123 South Front Street, Dept. 8074, Memphis,

Tennessee 38103.

P
r
o
x
y

How many shares must be present to constitute a quorum for the Meeting?

Holders of a majority of the shares of the voting power of the Company’s stock must be present in person
or by proxy in order for a quorum to be present. If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the Annual
Meeting, we may adjourn the Meeting, without notice other than announcement at the Meeting, until a quorum
is present or represented. Any business which could have been transacted at the Meeting as originally scheduled
can be conducted at the adjourned meeting.

Corporate Governance Matters

Independence

How many independent directors does AutoZone have?

Our Board has determined that eleven of our current twelve directors are independent: Douglas H. Brooks,
Linda A. Goodspeed, Earl G. Graves, Jr., Enderson Guimaraes, J. R. Hyde, III, D. Bryan Jordan, Gale V. King,
W. Andrew McKenna, George R. Mrkonic, Jr., Luis P. Nieto, Jr. and Jill A. Soltau. All of these directors meet
the independence standards of our Corporate Governance Principles and the New York Stock Exchange listing
standards.

How does AutoZone determine whether a director is independent?

In accordance with AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, a director is considered independent if

the director meets the independence requirements of the applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards,
and, with respect to the Audit Committee, the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

In determining the independence of our directors, the Board considers relationships involving directors and
their immediate family members that are relevant under applicable laws and regulations, the listing standards of
the New York Stock Exchange, and the standards contained in our Corporate Governance Principles. The Board
relies on information from Company records and questionnaires completed annually by each director.

As part of its most recent independence determinations, the Board noted that AutoZone does not have, and
did not have during fiscal 2018, significant commercial relationships with companies at which Board members
served as officers or directors, or in which Board members or their immediate family members held an
aggregate of 10% or more direct or indirect interest.

The Board considered the fact that Mr. Jordan is the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive

Officer and a member of the board of directors of First Horizon National Corporation, parent company of First
Tennessee Bank, which

• participates in one of AutoZone’s supplier confirmed receivables programs (under which some AutoZone

vendors are borrowers, but AutoZone is not);

• has established a Daylight Overdraft line which allows AutoZone to make large payments early in the

morning creating a “daylight” overdraft which is rectified at the end of the day;

• acted as Trustee for AutoZone’s pension plan;

• offers brokerage services to AutoZone employees exercising stock options, and

• holds various AutoZone deposit accounts.

During fiscal 2018, First Horizon National Corporation did business with AutoZone in arm’s length

transactions which were not, individually or cumulatively, material to either AutoZone or First Horizon National
Corporation and which did not materially benefit Mr. Jordan, either directly or indirectly.

The Board also considered the fact that Mr. Brooks is a member of the board of directors of Southwest

Airlines. During fiscal 2018, AutoZone purchased airline tickets from Southwest Airlines which were not,
individually or cumulatively, material to either AutoZone or Southwest Airlines and which did not materially
benefit Mr. Brooks, either directly or indirectly.

P
r
o
x
y

The Board also reviewed donations made by the Company to not-for-profit organizations with which Board

members or their immediate family members were affiliated by membership or service or as directors or
trustees.

Based on its review of the above matters, the Board determined that none of Messrs. Brooks, Graves,

Guimaraes, Hyde, Jordan, McKenna, Mrkonic, or Nieto or Mses. Goodspeed, King, or Soltau has a material
relationship with the Company and that all of them are independent within the meaning of the AutoZone
Corporate Governance Principles and applicable law and listing standards. The Board also determined that
Mr. Rhodes is not independent since he is an employee of the Company.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board believes that having a combined Chairman/CEO, independent members and chairs for each of
our Board committees, and an independent Lead Director currently provides the best board leadership structure
for AutoZone. This structure, together with our other corporate governance practices, provides strong
independent oversight of management while ensuring clear strategic alignment throughout the Company. Our
Lead Director is a non-employee director who is elected by the Board. Earl G. Graves, Jr., a director since 2002,
currently serves as our Lead Director.

Our Lead Director:

• Chairs Board meetings when the Chairman is not present, including presiding at all executive sessions of

the Board (without management present) at every regularly scheduled Board meeting;

• Works with management to determine the information and materials to be provided to Board members;

• Approves Board meeting agendas, schedules, and other information to be provided to the Board;

• Consults with the Chairman on such other matters as are pertinent to the Board and the Company;

• Has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;

• Is available for direct communication and consultation with major shareholders upon request; and

• Serves as liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors.

Board Risk Oversight

Oversight of risk management is a responsibility of the Board and is an integral part of the Board’s
oversight of AutoZone’s business. AutoZone’s management takes a variety of calculated risks in order to
enhance Company performance and shareholder value. The primary responsibility for the identification,
assessment and management of the various risks resides with AutoZone’s management. The Board is primarily
responsible for ensuring that management has established and adequately resourced processes for identifying
and preparing the Company to manage risks effectively. Additionally, the Board reviews the Company’s
principal strategic and operating risks as part of its regular discussion and consideration of AutoZone’s strategy
and operating results. The Board also reviews periodically with the General Counsel legal matters that may have
a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with laws, and
any material reports received from regulatory agencies.

P
r
o
x
y

The Audit Committee is involved in the Board’s oversight of risk management. At each of its regular
meetings, the Audit Committee reviews the Company’s major financial exposures and the steps management has
taken to identify, assess, monitor, control, remediate and report such exposures. The Audit Committee, along
with management, also evaluates the effectiveness of the risk avoidance and mitigation processes in place. Such
risk-related information is then summarized, reported and discussed at each quarterly Board meeting.

To assist with risk management and oversight, AutoZone has adopted the concept of enterprise risk
management (“ERM”) using the framework issued in 2004 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission. The Company’s Vice President of Internal Audit, who reports directly to the Audit
Committee, has been charged with leading the Company’s ERM processes with the assistance of Company
management. The Vice President of Internal Audit presents to the Audit Committee a comprehensive review of
the Company’s ERM processes annually. This presentation includes an overview of all significant risks that
have been identified and assessed and the strategies developed by management for managing such risks. The
Vice President of Internal Audit leads open discussions with the Audit Committee members to analyze the
significance of the risks identified and to verify that the list is all-inclusive. Company management is also
involved in these discussions to ensure that the Board gains a full understanding of the risks and the strategies
that management has implemented to manage the risks.

Other Board committees also consider significant risks within their areas of responsibility. The

Compensation Committee considers risk in connection with the design of AutoZone’s compensation programs.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks related to the Company’s governance
policies and practices.

Corporate Governance Documents

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Principles; charters for its Audit, Compensation, and
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees; a Code of Conduct for directors, officers and employees of
AutoZone; and a Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Executives. Each of these documents is available on our
corporate website at www.autozoneinc.com and is also available, free of charge, in print to any stockholder who
requests it.

Meetings and Attendance

How many times did AutoZone’s Board meet during the last fiscal year?

During the 2018 fiscal year, the Board held four meetings.

Did any of AutoZone’s directors attend fewer than 75% of the meetings of the Board and their assigned
committees?

All of our directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and their assigned committees
during the fiscal year or such portion of the fiscal year after their election or appointment if they did not serve
the entire fiscal year.

What is AutoZone’s policy with respect to directors’ attendance at the Annual Meeting?

As a general matter, all directors are expected to attend our Annual Meetings. At our 2017 Annual Meeting,

all directors were present.

Do AutoZone’s non-management directors meet regularly in executive session?

The non-management members of our Board regularly meet in executive sessions in conjunction with each

regularly scheduled Board meeting. Our Lead Director, Mr. Graves, presides at these sessions.

P
r
o
x
y

Committees of the Board

What are the standing committees of AutoZone’s Board?

AutoZone’s Board has three standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each consisting only of independent directors.

Audit Committee

What is the function of the Audit Committee?

The Audit Committee is responsible for:

• the integrity of the Company’s financial statements,

• the independent auditor’s qualification, independence and performance,

• the performance of the Company’s internal audit function, and

• the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Audit Committee performs its duties by:

• evaluating, appointing or dismissing, determining compensation for, and overseeing the work of the

independent public accounting firm employed to conduct the annual audit, which reports to the Audit
Committee;

• pre-approving all audit and permitted non-audit services performed by the independent auditor,

considering issues of auditor independence;

• conducting periodic reviews with Company officers, management, independent auditors, and the internal

audit function;

• reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditor the Company’s annual audited

financial statements, quarterly financial statements, internal controls report and the independent auditor’s
attestation thereof, and other matters related to the Company’s financial statements and disclosures;

• overseeing the Company’s internal audit function;

• reporting periodically to the Board and making appropriate recommendations; and

• preparing the report of the Audit Committee required to be included in the annual proxy statement.

Who are the members of the Audit Committee?

The Audit Committee consists of Ms. Goodspeed, Mr. Jordan, Mr. McKenna (Chair), Mr. Mrkonic, and

Mr. Nieto.

Are all of the members of the Audit Committee independent?

Yes, the Audit Committee consists entirely of independent directors under the standards of AutoZone’s
Corporate Governance Principles, the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the applicable
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

P
r
o
x
y

Does the Audit Committee have an Audit Committee Financial Expert?

The Board has determined that Ms. Goodspeed, Mr. Jordan, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Mrkonic and Mr. Nieto
each meet the qualifications of an audit committee financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. All members of the Audit Committee meet the New York Stock Exchange definition of financial
literacy.

How many times did the Audit Committee meet during the last fiscal year?

During the 2018 fiscal year, the Audit Committee held nine meetings.

Where can I find the charter of the Audit Committee?

The Audit Committee’s charter is available on our corporate website at www.autozoneinc.com and is also

available, free of charge, in print to any stockholder who requests it.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee of AutoZone, Inc. has reviewed and discussed AutoZone’s audited financial
statements for the year ended August 25, 2018, with AutoZone’s management. In addition, we have discussed
with Ernst & Young LLP, AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be
discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communications with Audit Committees, as amended and
as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and the charter of the Committee.

The Committee also has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required
by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the firm’s communications with the Audit Committee
concerning independence, and we have discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence from the
Company and its management. The Committee has discussed with AutoZone’s management and the auditing
firm such other matters and received such assurances from them as we deemed appropriate.

As a result of our review and discussions, we have recommended to the Board of Directors the inclusion of

AutoZone’s audited financial statements in the annual report for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2018, on
Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee

does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits or to determine that AutoZone’s financial statements are
complete, accurate, or in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; AutoZone’s management
and the independent auditor have this responsibility. Nor does the Audit Committee have the duty to assure
compliance with laws and regulations and the policies of the Board of Directors.

W. Andrew McKenna (Chair)
Linda A. Goodspeed
D. Bryan Jordan
George R. Mrkonic, Jr.
Luis P. Nieto

The above Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed
or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by reference
therein.

Compensation Committee

What is the function of the Compensation Committee?

P
r
o
x
y

The Compensation Committee has the authority, based on its charter and the AutoZone Corporate

Governance Principles, to:

• review and approve AutoZone’s compensation objectives;

• review and approve the compensation programs, plans, policies and awards for executive officers,

including recommending equity-based plans for stockholder approval;

• lead the independent directors in the evaluation of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”) in meeting established goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO;

• act as administrator as may be required by AutoZone’s short- and long-term incentive plans and stock or

stock-based plans; and

• review the compensation of AutoZone’s non-employee directors from time to time and recommend to the

full Board any changes that the Compensation Committee deems necessary.

The Compensation Committee may appoint subcommittees from time to time with such responsibilities as

it may deem appropriate; however, the committee may not delegate its authority to any other persons.

AutoZone’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation,

including the role of the Compensation Committee and compensation consultants, are described in the
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 20.

Who are the members of the Compensation Committee?

The Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Brooks, Ms. Goodspeed, Ms. King, Mr. McKenna, and
Mr. Mrkonic (Chair), all of whom are independent directors under the standards of AutoZone’s Corporate
Governance Principles and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

How many times did the Compensation Committee meet during the last fiscal year?

During the 2018 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee held six meetings.

Where can I find the charter of the Compensation Committee?

The Compensation Committee’s charter is available on our corporate website at www.autozoneinc.com and

is also available, free of charge, in print to any stockholder who requests it.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

What is the function of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee?

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ensures that:

• qualified candidates are presented to the Board for election as directors;

• the Board has adopted appropriate corporate governance principles that best serve the practices and

objectives of the Board; and

• AutoZone’s Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws are structured to best serve the interests of the

stockholders.

Who are the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee?

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Mr. Graves (Chair), Mr. Guimaraes,
Mr. Jordan, Mr. Nieto, and Ms. Soltau, all of whom are independent directors under the standards of AutoZone’s
Corporate Governance Principles and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

P
r
o
x
y

How many times did the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meet during the last fiscal
year?

During the 2018 fiscal year, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings.

Where can I find the charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee?

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter is available on our corporate website at

www.autozoneinc.com and is also available, free of charge, in print to any stockholder who requests it.

Director Nomination Process

What is the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s policy regarding consideration of director
candidates recommended by stockholders? How do stockholders submit such recommendations?

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s policy is to consider director candidate

recommendations from stockholders if they are submitted in writing to AutoZone’s Secretary in accordance with
the procedure set forth in Article III, Section 1 of AutoZone’s Seventh Amended and Restated By-Laws
(“By-Laws”), including biographical and business experience, information regarding the nominee and other
information required by said Article III, Section 1. Copies of the By-Laws will be provided upon written request
to AutoZone’s Secretary and are also available on AutoZone’s corporate website at www.autozoneinc.com.

What qualifications must a nominee have in order to be recommended by the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee for a position on the Board?

The Board believes each individual director should possess certain personal characteristics, and that the

Board as a whole should possess certain core competencies. Such personal characteristics are integrity and
accountability, informed judgment, financial literacy, mature confidence, high performance standards, and
passion. They should also have demonstrated the confidence to be truly independent, as well as be business
savvy, have an owner orientation and have a genuine interest in AutoZone. Core competencies of the Board as a
whole are accounting and finance, business judgment, management expertise, crisis response, industry
knowledge, international markets, strategy and vision. These characteristics and competencies are set forth in
more detail in AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, which are available on AutoZone’s corporate
website at www.autozoneinc.com.

How does the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identify and evaluate nominees for
director?

Prior to each annual meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected, the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee considers incumbent directors and other qualified individuals, if necessary, as
potential director nominees. In evaluating a potential nominee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee considers the personal characteristics described above, and also reviews the composition of the full

Board to determine the areas of expertise and core competencies needed to enhance the function of the Board.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider other factors such as the size of the
Board, whether a candidate is independent, how many other public company directorships a candidate holds, and
the listing standards requirements of the New York Stock Exchange.

P
r
o
x
y

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recognizes the importance of selecting directors

from various backgrounds and professions in order to ensure that the Board as a whole has a variety of
experiences and perspectives which contribute to a more effective decision-making process. The Board does not
have a specific diversity policy, but considers diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, age, cultural background and
professional experiences in evaluating candidates for Board membership.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying potential

nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee through current Board members, stockholders or other persons. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee may retain a search firm or other consulting firm from time to time to identify potential
nominees. Nominees recommended by stockholders in accordance with the procedure described above, i.e.,
submitted in writing to AutoZone’s Secretary, accompanied by the biographical and business experience
information regarding the nominee and the other information required by Article III, Section 1 of the By-Laws,
will receive the same consideration as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s other potential
nominees.

Procedure for Communication with the Board of Directors

How can stockholders and other interested parties communicate with the Board?

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board by writing to the Board, to any
individual director or to the non-management directors as a group c/o Corporate Secretary, AutoZone, Inc., 123
South Front Street, Dept. 8074, Memphis, Tennessee 38103. The Company’s General Counsel and Secretary
will review all such correspondence and will forward correspondence that, in her opinion, deals with the
function of the Board or that she otherwise determines requires the attention of any member, group or committee
of the Board. Communications addressed to the Board or to the non-management directors as a group will be
forwarded to the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and communications
addressed to a committee of the Board will be forwarded to the chair of that committee.

Compensation of Directors

Director Compensation Table

This table shows the compensation paid to our non-employee directors during the 2018 fiscal year. No
amounts were paid to our non-employee directors during the 2018 fiscal year that would be classified as “Option
Awards,” “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation,” “Changes in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings” or “All Other Compensation,” so these columns have been omitted from the table.

P
r
o
x
y

Name (1)

Douglas H. Brooks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Linda A. Goodspeed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sue E. Gove . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earl G. Graves, Jr.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Enderson Guimaraes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J.R. Hyde, III
D. Bryan Jordan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gale V. King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
W. Andrew McKenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
George R. Mrkonic, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Luis P. Nieto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jill A. Soltau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fees
Paid in Cash
($)
(2)

83,750
—
25,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
95,625
32,545

Stock
Awards
($)
(3)

129,996
227,496
—
259,999
214,997
214,997
227,496
136,065
239,995
247,500
129,996
82,274

Total
($)

213,746
227,496
25,000
259,999
214,997
214,997
227,496
136,065
239,995
247,500
225,621
114,819

(1) William C. Rhodes, III, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, serves on the Board but does

not receive any compensation for his service as a director. His compensation as an employee of the
Company is shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 32. Ms. Gove did not stand for re-election
to the Board at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Ms. King and Ms. Soltau joined the Board on
May 15, 2018.

(2) Under the Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the “Amended 2011
Equity Plan”), AutoZone’s non-employee directors receive their director compensation in the form of
Restricted Stock Units, which are contractual rights to receive in the future a share of AutoZone stock. Upon
timely election, non-employee directors may elect to receive $85,000 of the annual retainer fee, plus any
additional fees, in the form of cash, paid in quarterly installments in advance (on January 1, April 1, July 1
and October 1 of each calendar year). This column represents the portion of the Director Compensation that
was paid in cash and earned in fiscal year 2018. The amount shown for Sue Gove relates to her final
quarterly cash payment in 2017, during the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2018.

(3) The “Stock Awards” column represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 718 for awards of Restricted Stock Units under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan during
fiscal 2018. See Note B Share-Based Payments, to our consolidated financial statements in our 2018 Annual
Report for a discussion of our accounting for share-based awards and the assumptions used. The aggregate
number of outstanding awards of common stock under the AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan
(“Stock Units”) and Restricted Stock Units held by each director at the end of fiscal 2018 are shown in the
following footnote 4. See “Security Ownership of Management and Board of Directors” on page 13 for more
information about our directors’ stock ownership.

P
r
o
x
y

(4) As of August 25, 2018, each current non-employee director had the following aggregate number of

outstanding Stock Units, Restricted Stock Units and stock options:

Name

Douglas H. Brooks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Linda A. Goodspeed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earl G. Graves, Jr.
Enderson Guimaraes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J.R. Hyde, III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D. Bryan Jordan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gale V. King . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
W. Andrew McKenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
George R. Mrkonic, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Luis Nieto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jill A. Soltau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Stock
Units
(#)

—
—
3,417
—
7,505
—
—
4,247
1,405
1,136
—

Restricted
Stock
Units
(#)

Stock
Options
(#)

1,132
1,785
3,797
2,194
3,330
1,801
208
3,468
3,464
2,767
126

—
—
1,000
—
6,000
—
—
6,000
—
—
—

Narrative Accompanying Director Compensation Table

AutoZone’s current director compensation program became effective January 1, 2018.

Annual Retainer Fees. Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer fee of $215,000 (the “Annual
Retainer”). The lead director receives an additional fee (“Additional Fee”) of $30,000 annually, the chair of the
Audit Committee receives an Additional Fee of $25,000 per year, the chair of the Compensation Committee
receives an Additional Fee of $20,000 per year, the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee receives an Additional Fee of $15,000 per year, and the non-chair members of the Audit Committee
each receive an Additional Fee of $12,500 per year (such Additional Fees, together with the Annual Retainer,
the “Director Compensation”). There are no meeting fees.

Under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan, which replaced the AutoZone, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Award
Plan (the “2011 Equity Plan”), non-employee directors receive Director Compensation in the form of Restricted
Stock Units, which are contractual rights to receive in the future a share of AutoZone common stock. Upon
timely delivery of an election form, a non-employee director may elect to receive $85,000 of the Annual
Retainer plus any Additional Fees in the form of cash, paid in quarterly installments, with the remainder of the
Annual Retainer paid in the form of Restricted Stock Units. All Restricted Stock Units are granted on January 1
of the applicable calendar year.

If a non-employee director is elected to the Board, or assumes a different position, after the beginning of a

calendar quarter, he or she will receive the Annual Retainer and/or Additional Fees, prorated based on the
number of days remaining in the calendar year, for Restricted Stock Units or quarter, for cash, as appropriate.

Restricted Stock Units become payable on the earlier to occur of (1) the fifth anniversary of the grant date,

or (2) the date on which the non-employee director ceases to be a director (the “Payment Date”). Upon timely
delivery of an election form, a non-employee director may elect to receive payment on the date on which he or
she ceases to be a director. Restricted Stock Units are payable in shares of AutoZone common stock no later
than the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of the tax year in which such Payment Date occurs.

Other Predecessor Plans

The AutoZone, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan was terminated in

December 2002 and was replaced by the AutoZone, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2003 Director
Compensation Plan (the “2003 Director Compensation Plan”) and the AutoZone, Inc. First Amended and

P
r
o
x
y

Restated 2003 Director Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Director Stock Option Plan”). The 2003 Director
Compensation Plan and the 2003 Director Stock Option Plan were terminated in December 2010 and replaced
by the 2011 Equity Plan. The 2011 Equity Plan was terminated in December 2015 and replaced with the
Amended 2011 Equity Plan. However, grants made under those plans continue in effect under the terms of the
grant made and are included in the aggregate awards outstanding shown above.

Stock Ownership Requirement

The Board has established a stock ownership requirement for non-employee directors. Each director is
required to own AutoZone common stock and/or restricted stock units having a cumulative fair market value in
an amount equal to three times the value of the base annual retainer payable pursuant to the Director
Compensation Program within five years of joining the Board, and to maintain such ownership level thereafter.
Exceptions to this requirement may only be made by the Board under compelling mitigating circumstances.
Shares, Stock Units and Restricted Stock Units issued under the AutoZone, Inc. Second Amended and Restated
Director Compensation Plan, the 2003 Director Compensation Plan, the 2011 Equity Plan and the Amended
2011 Equity Plan count toward this requirement. The in-the-money value of vested stock options does not count
toward this requirement. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, each director meets or exceeds his or her
obligations under the requirement.

Security Ownership of Management and Board of Directors

OTHER INFORMATION

This table shows the beneficial ownership of common stock by each director, the Principal Executive
Officer, the Principal Financial Officer and the other three most highly compensated executive officers, and all
current directors and executive officers as a group. Unless stated otherwise in the notes to the table, each person
named below has sole authority to vote and invest the shares shown.

Beneficial Ownership as of October 22, 2018

Name of Beneficial Owner

Douglas H. Brooks . . . . . . . .
Linda A. Goodspeed . . . . . . .
Earl G. Graves, Jr.
. . . . . . . .
Enderson Guimaraes . . . . . .
J. R. Hyde, III(4)
. . . . . . . . .
D. Bryan Jordan . . . . . . . . . .
Gale V. King . . . . . . . . . . . .
W. Andrew McKenna . . . . .
George R. Mrkonic, Jr. . . . . .
Luis P. Nieto . . . . . . . . . . . . .
William C. Rhodes, III(5)
. .
Jill A. Soltau . . . . . . . . . . . . .
William T. Giles(6) . . . . . . .
William W. Graves(7) . . . . .
Mark A. Finestone(8) . . . . . .
Thomas B. Newbern . . . . . . .
All current directors and
executive officers as a
group (25 persons) . . . . . .

* Less than 1%.

Deferred
Stock
Units(1)

Options(2)

Restricted
Stock
Units(3)

0
0
3,417
0
7,505
0
0
4,247
1,405
1,136
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
1,000
0
6,000
0
0
6,000
0
0
92,161
0
76,112
29,067
51,767
26,592

1,132
1,785
3,797
2,194
3,330
1,801
208
3,468
3,464
2,767
0
126
0
0
0
0

772
0
0
0
68,600
240
0
3,800
0
0
48,231
0
8,995
7,066
3,996
12,668

Total

1,904
1,785
8,214
2,194
85,435
2,041
208
17,515
4,869
3,903
140,392
126
85,107
36,133
55,763
39,260

Ownership
Percentage

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

164,154

17,710

506,671

24,072

712,607

2.8%

P
r
o
x
y

(1) Includes shares that may be acquired immediately upon termination as a director by conversion of Stock

Units.

(2) Includes shares that may be acquired upon exercise of stock options either immediately or within sixty

(60) days of October 22, 2018.

(3) Includes Restricted Stock Units that may be acquired within sixty (60) days of termination of service as a

director.

(4) Does not include 2,000 shares owned by Mr. Hyde’s wife.

(5) Includes 847 shares held as custodian for Mr. Rhodes’ children, 1,009 shares held as trustee of trusts for
Mr. Rhodes’ children, 777 shares held as trustee of trusts for Mr. Rhodes’ nieces and nephews, 11,290
shares owned by a trust for Mr. Rhodes’ wife and 17,342 shares owned by two (2) grantor retained annuity
trusts. Also includes 2,634 shares held by a charitable foundation for which Mr. Rhodes is president and a
director and for which he shares investment and voting power.

(6) Includes 4,000 shares owned by a grantor retained annuity trust.

(7) Includes 3,600 shares owned by two (2) grantor retained annuity trusts.

(8) Includes 102 shares held in trusts for Mr. Finestone’s children and 2,575 shares owned by two (2) grantor

retained annuity trusts.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following entities are known by us to own more than five percent of our outstanding common stock:

Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner

Ownership
Percentage(1)

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,349,639

9.2%

PO Box 2600, V26
Valley Forge, PA 19482
JPMorgan Chase & Co.(3)

270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,949,590

7.6%

Blackrock, Inc.(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,858,515

7.3%

55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055

FMR LLC(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,314,703

5.1%

245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210

(1) The ownership percentages are calculated based on the number of shares of AutoZone common stock

outstanding as of October 22, 2018.

(2) The source of this information is the Form 13F filed by The Vanguard Group, Inc. on August 14, 2018 for
the quarter ending June 30, 2018. The shares are beneficially owned by a group consisting of Vanguard
Group Inc. (2,307,128 shares); Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co. (26,707 shares); and Vanguard Investments
Australia, Ltd. (15,804 shares).

(3) The source of this information is the Form 13F filed by J.P. Morgan on August 14, 2018 for the quarter

ending June 30, 2018. The shares are beneficially owned by a group consisting of J.P. Morgan Investment
Management Inc. (1,663,059); JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (193,238 shares); JPMorgan Asset
Management (UK) Ltd. (58,470 shares); JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc. (23,494 shares);
J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC (6,527 shares); JF Asset Management Ltd. (3,470 shares); JPMorgan Asset
Management (Japan) Ltd. (880 shares); J.P. Morgan Trust Co. of Delaware (332 shares); and JPMorgan
Funds (Asia) Ltd. (120 shares).

(4) The source of this information is the Form 13F filed by Blackrock, Inc. on August 9, 2018 for the quarter
ending June 30, 2018. The shares are beneficially owned by a group consisting of BlackRock Institutional

Trust Company, N.A. (730,716 shares); BlackRock Fund Advisors (648,393 shares); BlackRock Investment
Management (UK) Limited (101,069 shares); BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited (87,496
shares); BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. (74,985 shares); BlackRock Investment Management, LLC
(57,380 shares); BlackRock Japan Co. Ltd (33,938 shares); BlackRock Life Limited (28,416 shares);
BlackRock Fund Managers Limited (27,755 shares); BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited
(21,848 shares); BlackRock Capital Management, Inc. (11,944 shares); BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited
(11,180 shares); BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited (8,976 shares); BlackRock
Advisors LLC (6,762 shares); BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V. (3,855 shares); BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A.
(1,550 shares); BlackRock International Limited (1,126 shares); BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG
(562 shares); BlackRock (Singapore) Limited (348 shares); and BlackRock Asset Management North Asia
Ltd (216 shares).

(5) The source of this information is the Form 13F filed by FMR LLC on August 10, 2018 for the quarter

ending June 30, 2018. The shares are beneficially owned by a group consisting of Fidelity Management &
Research Co. and FMR Co. Inc. (1,268,003 shares); Strategic Advisers LLC (31,731 shares); FIAM LLC
(11,197 shares); and Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Trust Co., (3,772 shares).

P
r
o
x
y

PROPOSAL 1 — Election of Directors

THE PROPOSALS

Eleven directors will be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve until the next annual meeting of
stockholders in 2019. Pursuant to AutoZone’s Seventh Amended and Restated By-Laws, in an uncontested
election of directors, a nominee for director is elected to the Board if the number of votes cast for such
nominee’s election exceed the number of votes cast against such nominee’s election. (If the number of nominees
were to exceed the number of directors to be elected, i.e., a contested election, directors would be elected by a
plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.) Pursuant to AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles,
incumbent directors must agree to tender their resignation if they fail to receive the required number of votes for
re-election, and in such event the Board will act within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote to
determine whether to accept the director’s resignation. These procedures are described in more detail in our
Corporate Governance Principles, which are available on our corporate website at www.autozoneinc.com. The
Board may consider any factors it deems relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation. If a
director’s resignation offer is not accepted by the Board, that director will continue to serve until AutoZone’s
next annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until the
director’s earlier death, resignation, or removal.

Any director nominee who is not an incumbent director and who does not receive a majority vote in an
uncontested election will not be elected as a director, and a vacancy will be left on the Board. The Board, in its
sole discretion, may either fill a vacancy resulting from a director nominee not receiving a majority vote
pursuant to the By-Laws or decrease the size of the Board to eliminate the vacancy.

Broker non-votes occur when shares held by a brokerage firm are not voted with respect to a proposal
because the firm has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and the firm does
not have the authority to vote the shares in its discretion. Shares abstaining from voting and shares as to which a
broker non-vote occurs are considered present for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, but are not
considered votes cast or shares entitled to vote with respect to such matter. Accordingly, abstentions and broker
non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 1.

The Board recommends that the stockholders vote FOR each of these nominees. These nominees have

consented to serve if elected. Should any nominee be unavailable to serve, your proxy will be voted for the
substitute nominee recommended by the Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors on the Board.

With the exception of Gale V. King and Jill A. Soltau, each of the nominees named below was elected a

director at the 2017 annual meeting. J. R. Hyde, III is not standing for re-election to the Board.

Nominees

The nominees are:

P
r
o
x
y

Douglas H. Brooks, 66, has been a director since 2013. He is retired. Until his retirement in 2013, he

had held various positions with Brinker International, including serving as Non-Executive Chairman of the
Board of Brinker International from January 2013 until December 2013; Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Brinker from 2004 until January 2013, and President and Chief Operating Officer
from 1999 to 2004. He served on the Brinker board of directors from 1999 through 2013 and on the Club
Corp. board of directors from 2013 through 2017. Mr. Brooks is also a director of Southwest Airlines.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications: The Board believes Mr. Brooks is qualified to serve as a
director of the Company based on his strategic and operational business background, his knowledge of
international operations, his experience as a chief executive officer of a public company, his experience
managing a company with a focus on customer service, his owner orientation, and his board experience as
well as his integrity, energy, and willingness to spend time on and interest in AutoZone.

Linda A. Goodspeed, 56, has been a director since 2013. She retired in 2017 as the Chief Operating
Officer and a Managing Partner at WealthStrategies Financial Advisors, positions she had held since 2007.
She had served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of ServiceMaster from 2011 to
2014. From 2008 to September 2011, Ms. Goodspeed served as Vice President, Information Systems and
Chief Information Officer for Nissan North America, Inc., a subsidiary of Nissan Motor Company, a global
manufacturer of vehicles. From 2001 to 2008, Ms. Goodspeed served as Executive Vice President at
Lennox International, Inc., a global manufacturer of air conditioning, heating and commercial refrigeration
equipment. She is also a director of American Electric Power Co., Inc., and Darling Ingredients Inc., and
was a director of Global Power Equipment Group through April 2018.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications: The Board believes Ms. Goodspeed is qualified to serve as a
director of the Company based on her experience in key strategic and operational roles with several large
global companies, her expertise in information technology and previous position as the chief information
officer of a service company, her owner orientation, her board experience and her executive management
skills, as well as her integrity, energy, and willingness to spend time on and interest in AutoZone.

Earl G. Graves, Jr., 56, has been a director since 2002 and was elected Lead Director in January 2009.

He has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Black Enterprise, publisher of Black Enterprise
Magazine, since January 2006, and was President and Chief Operating Officer from 1998 to 2006.
Mr. Graves has been employed by the same company in various capacities since 1988.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications: The Board believes Mr. Graves is qualified to serve as a

director of the Company based on his business, management and strategic planning experience, his
knowledge of advertising and marketing, his owner orientation, and his board experience, as well as his
integrity, energy, and willingness to spend time on and interest in AutoZone.

Enderson Guimaraes, 59, has been a director since 2012. In 2017, he retired as the President and Chief

Operating Officer for Laureate Education, Inc., positions he had held since 2015. He was Executive Vice
President, Global Categories and Operations of PepsiCo, Inc. from January 2015 through July 2015. He
served as Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo Europe and Sub-Sahara Africa from September 2012 through
January 2015. He was also President of PepsiCo Global Operations from October 2011 to September 2012.
Mr. Guimaraes previously had served as Executive Vice President of Electrolux and Chief Executive
Officer of its major appliances business in Europe, Africa and the Middle East from 2008 to 2011. Prior to
this, Mr. Guimaraes spent 10 years at Philips Electronics, first as a regional marketing executive in Brazil
and ultimately as Senior Vice President and head of Global Marketing Management and general manager
of the WidiWall LED display business. He also served as CEO of Philips’ Lifestyle Incubator group, an
innovation engine which created new businesses and developed them over several years. Earlier,

P
r
o
x
y

Mr. Guimaraes worked in various marketing positions at Danone and Johnson & Johnson. He is also a
director of Refresco Group B.V. and Sunshine Top B.V.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications: The Board believes Mr. Guimaraes is qualified to serve as a

director of the Company based on his business, management and strategic planning experience, his
knowledge of advertising, marketing and international operations, and his owner orientation as well as his
integrity, energy, and willingness to spend time on and interest in AutoZone.

D. Bryan Jordan, 56, has been a director since 2013. He has served as Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of First Horizon National Corporation since January 1, 2012, and has
held the positions of President and Chief Executive Officer and director since 2008. From May 2007 until
September 2008 Mr. Jordan was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Horizon and
First Tennessee Bank National Association, and prior to that he served in various positions at Regions
Financial Corporation and its subsidiary Regions Bank, including (beginning in 2002) as Chief Financial
Officer.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications:

The Board believes Mr. Jordan is qualified to serve as a

director of the Company based on his extensive experience in the banking and financial services industry,
his experience serving as the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of public companies, his
knowledge of corporate finance and management, and his owner orientation, as well as his integrity,
energy, and willingness to spend time on and interest in AutoZone.

Gale King, 62, has been a director since May 2018. She has been the Executive Vice President and

Chief Administrative Officer for Nationwide Insurance Company since 2012, and served as the Executive
Vice President – Chief Human Resources Officer from 2009 to 2012.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications:

The Board believes Ms. King is qualified to serve as a

director of the Company based on her extensive experience in human resources, her owner orientation and
her executive management skills, as well as her integrity, energy, and willingness to spend time on and
interest in AutoZone.

W. Andrew McKenna, 72, has been a director since 2000 and served as Lead Director from June 2007

through January 2009. He is retired. Until his retirement in 1999, he had held various positions with The
Home Depot, Inc., including Senior Vice President–Strategic Business Development from 1997 to 1999;
President, Midwest Division from 1994 to 1997; and Senior Vice President–Corporate Information Systems
from 1990 to 1994. Prior to joining Home Depot he was a Partner, Management Consulting, with
Deloitte & Touche for 10 years. He was also President of SciQuest.com, Inc. in 2000. Mr. McKenna was a
director of Danka Business Systems PLC from 2002 to 2008, serving as Chairman of the Board from
March 2005 to March 2006. Mr. McKenna was a director of Bally Technologies from 2011 to 2014, when
the company was sold.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications: The Board believes Mr. McKenna is qualified to serve as a
director of the Company based on his executive experience in the retail industry and other industries, his
expertise in strategic business development, his background in finance, audit and information technology,
his owner orientation, and his board experience, as well as his integrity, energy, and willingness to spend
time on and interest in AutoZone.

George R. Mrkonic, Jr., 66, has been a director since 2006. He is the non-Executive Chairman of Maru

Group, a London, UK based research, insight and advisory services firm. Previously, he was the
Non-Executive Chairman of Paperchase Products Limited, London, UK, a retailer of cards, stationery,
wraps and gifts in the UK, Europe and the Middle East, since 2005, and has been a director since 1999.
Prior to that, he was President of Borders Group, Inc. from 1994 to 1997 and Vice Chairman of Borders
Group, Inc. from 1994 to 2002. He is also a director of Brinker International, Inc., and Ulta Salon,
Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. Mr. Mrkonic was a director of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. from 2007
to 2015 and Syntel, Inc. from 2009 to May 2016.

P
r
o
x
y

Experience, Skills and Qualifications: The Board believes Mr. Mrkonic is qualified to serve as a
director of the Company based on his experience as a senior executive in retail companies, his knowledge
of corporate strategy, finance, and management, his owner orientation, and his board experience, as well as
his integrity, energy, and willingness to spend time on and interest in AutoZone.

Luis P. Nieto, 63, has been a director since 2008. He is president of Nieto Advisory LLC which
provides advisory services to small consumer food companies. He was president of the Consumer Foods
Group of ConAgra Foods Inc., one of the largest packaged foods companies in North America, from 2008
until his retirement in June 2009. Previously, he was president of ConAgra Refrigerated Foods from 2006
to 2008 and ConAgra Meats from 2005 to 2006. Prior to joining ConAgra, Mr. Nieto was President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Federated Group, a leading private label supplier to the retail grocery and
foodservice industries from 2002 to 2005. From 2000 to 2002, he served as President of the National
Refrigerated Products Group of Dean Foods Company. He held other positions at Dean Foods Group from
1998 to 2000. Prior to joining Dean Foods, Mr. Nieto held positions in brand management and strategic
planning with Mission Foods, Kraft Foods and the Quaker Oats Company. Mr. Nieto is also a director of
Ryder Systems, Inc.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications: The Board believes Mr. Nieto is qualified to serve as a
director of the Company based on his expertise in brand management and marketing, including experience
managing a diverse portfolio of brands and products, as well as his knowledge of finance and operations,
his executive management experience, his owner orientation and his board experience, as well as his
integrity, energy, and willingness to spend time on and interest in AutoZone.

William C. Rhodes, III, 53, was elected Chairman in June 2007. He has been President, Chief
Executive Officer, and a director since 2005. Prior to his appointment as President and Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Rhodes was Executive Vice President–Store Operations and Commercial. Prior to fiscal 2005,
he had been Senior Vice President–Supply Chain and Information Technology since fiscal 2002, and prior
thereto had been Senior Vice President–Supply Chain since 2001. Prior to that time, he served in various
capacities within the Company since 1994. Prior to 1994, Mr. Rhodes was a manager with Ernst & Young
LLP. Mr. Rhodes is also a director of Dollar General Corporation.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications: The Board believes Mr. Rhodes, AutoZone’s Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, is qualified to serve as a director of the Company based on his 20
plus years’ experience with the Company, which have included responsibility for corporate strategy,
executive management, operations, finance, supply chain and information technology; his knowledge and
understanding of the automotive aftermarket and retail industries; his financial background and his owner
orientation, as well as his integrity and energy.

Jill Ann Soltau, 51, has been a director since May 2018. She has been the Chief Executive Officer of J.

C. Penney Company, Inc. since October 15, 2018. She was the President and Chief Executive Officer of
JOANN Stores, the nation’s largest craft and fabric retailer, from February 2015 through October 2018.
Prior to joining JOANN, Ms. Soltau served as President of Shopko Stores and has held senior level
positions in national and regional retailers, including Kohl’s and former Saks Inc. subsidiaries.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications: The Board believes Ms. Soltau is qualified to serve as a
director of the Company based on her experience as a senior executive, including being a chief executive
officer, in the retail industry, her owner orientation, and her executive management skills, as well as her
integrity, energy, and willingness to spend time on and interest in AutoZone.

PROPOSAL 2 — Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ernst & Young LLP, our independent auditor for the past thirty-one fiscal years, has been selected by the

Audit Committee to be AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 fiscal year.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to make a statement if they so
desire and to answer any appropriate questions.

P
r
o
x
y

The Audit Committee recommends that you vote FOR ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as

AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Under Nevada law and the Company’s By-Laws, if a quorum is present, Ernst & Young LLP will be
ratified as AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm if the number of votes cast in favor of the
matter exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the matter. Broker non-votes occur when shares held by
a brokerage firm are not voted with respect to a proposal because the firm has not received voting instructions
from the beneficial owner of the shares and the firm does not have the authority to vote the shares in its
discretion. Shares abstaining from voting and shares as to which a broker non-vote occurs are considered present
for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, but are not considered votes cast or shares entitled to vote
with respect to such matter. Accordingly, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome
of Proposal 2. The Audit Committee is not bound by a vote either for or against the firm. The Audit Committee
will consider a vote against the firm by the stockholders in selecting our independent registered public
accounting firm in the future.

During the past two fiscal years, the aggregate fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young

LLP were as follows:

2018

2017

Audit Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audit-Related Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax and other Non-Audit-Related Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,949,700
—

148,161(2)

$2,176,597

5,935(1)
78,326(2)

(1) Audit-Related Fees for 2017 were for services rendered for AutoZone de Mexico related to Banco Nacional

de Mexico, S.A.’s Foreign Exchange Correspondents certification process.

(2) Tax and other Non-Audit-Related Fees for 2018 and 2017 were for state, local and international tax services.

The Audit Committee pre-approves all services performed by the independent registered public accounting
firm under the terms contained in the Audit Committee charter, a copy of which can be obtained at our website
at www.autozoneinc.com. The Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of the services provided by Ernst & Young
LLP during the 2018 and 2017 fiscal years. The Audit Committee considers the services listed above to be
compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence.

PROPOSAL 3 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation — “Say-on-Pay”

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act, we are asking stockholders to approve the

following advisory resolution on the compensation of our Principal Executive Officer, our Principal Financial
Officer and our other three most highly paid executive officers (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) at
the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to AutoZone’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this

Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related
narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

This advisory vote, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to

endorse or not endorse our executive pay program. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” this resolution
because it believes that AutoZone’s executive compensation program, described in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, is effective in achieving the Company’s goals of rewarding financial and operating
performance and the creation of stockholder value.

Our Board and Compensation Committee believe that there should be a strong relationship between pay
and corporate performance, and our executive compensation program reflects this belief. While the overall level
and balance of compensation elements in our compensation program are designed to ensure that AutoZone can

P
r
o
x
y

retain key executives and, when necessary, attract qualified new executives to the organization, the emphasis of
AutoZone’s compensation program is linking executive compensation to business results and intrinsic value
creation, which is ultimately reflected in increases in stockholder value.

AutoZone sets challenging financial and operating goals, and a significant amount of an executive’s annual

cash compensation is tied to these objectives and therefore “at risk”—payment is earned only if performance
warrants it.

AutoZone’s compensation program is intended to support long-term focus on stockholder value, so it
emphasizes long-term rewards. At target levels, the majority of an executive officer’s total compensation
package each year is the potential value of his or her stock options, which yield value to the executive only if the
stock price appreciates.

Our management stock ownership requirement effectively promotes meaningful and significant stock

ownership by our Named Executive Officers and further aligns their interests with those of our stockholders.

We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, as well as the Summary Compensation

Table and related compensation tables and narrative, appearing on pages 20 through 45, which provide detailed
information on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices and the compensation of our Named
Executive Officers.

Because the vote on this proposal is advisory in nature, it is not binding on AutoZone, the Board or the
Compensation Committee. The vote on this proposal will, therefore, not affect any compensation already paid or
awarded to any Named Executive Officer and will not overrule any decisions made by the Board or the
Compensation Committee. Because we highly value the opinions of our stockholders, however, the Board and
the Compensation Committee will consider the results of this advisory vote when making future executive
compensation decisions.

Under Nevada law and the Company’s By-Laws, if a quorum is present, this matter will be approved if the
number of votes cast in favor of the matter exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the matter. Broker
non-votes occur when shares held by a brokerage firm are not voted with respect to a proposal because the firm
has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and the firm does not have the
authority to vote the shares in its discretion. Shares abstaining from voting and shares as to which a broker
non-vote occurs are considered present for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, but are not
considered votes cast or shares entitled to vote with respect to such matter. Accordingly, abstentions and broker
non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 3.

The Board recommends that the stockholders vote FOR this proposal.

Other Matters

We do not know of any matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those discussed in this

Proxy Statement. If, however, other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, your proxies will
be able to vote those matters in their discretion.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides a principles-based overview of AutoZone’s

executive compensation program. It discusses our rationale for the types and amounts of compensation that our
executive officers receive and how compensation decisions affecting these officers are made. It also discusses
AutoZone’s total rewards philosophy, the key principles governing our compensation program, and the
objectives we seek to achieve with each element of our compensation program.

P
r
o
x
y

What are the Company’s key compensation principles?

Pay for performance. The primary emphasis of AutoZone’s compensation program is linking executive

compensation to business results and intrinsic value creation, which is ultimately reflected in increases in
stockholder value. Base salary levels are intended to be competitive in the U.S. marketplace for executives, but
the more potentially valuable components of executive compensation are annual cash incentives, which depend
on the achievement of pre-determined business goals, and to a greater extent, long-term compensation, which is
based on the value of our stock.

Attract and retain talented AutoZoners. The overall level and balance of compensation elements in our
compensation program are designed to ensure that AutoZone can retain key executives and, when necessary,
attract qualified new executives to the organization. We believe that a company which provides quality products
and services to its customers, and delivers solid financial results, will generate long-term stockholder returns,
and that this is the most important component of attracting and retaining executive talent.

What are the Company’s overall executive compensation objectives?

Drive high performance. AutoZone sets challenging financial and operating goals, and a significant
amount of an executive’s annual cash compensation is tied to these objectives and therefore “at risk”—payment
is earned only if performance warrants it.

Drive long-term stockholder value. AutoZone’s compensation program is intended to support long-term
focus on stockholder value, so it emphasizes long-term rewards. At target levels, the majority of an executive
officer’s total compensation package each year is the potential value of his or her stock options.

The table below illustrates how AutoZone’s compensation program weights the base salary and “at-risk”

components of its Named Executive Officers’ fiscal 2018 total compensation. See the Summary Compensation
Table on page 32 for additional details about fiscal 2018 compensation for all of the Named Executive Officers
(“NEOs”).

Executive

Base Salary Annual Incentive Long-Term Incentive Total At-Risk

William C. Rhodes III*

All Other NEOs

16%

26%

20%

64%

54%

84%

74%

* Mr. Rhodes’ long-term incentive consists of fiscal 2018 stock and option grants, plus one-fifth of the total

annualized value of his one-time grant of 50,000 stock options in fiscal 2016. The one-time award vests 50%
on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date.

Who participates in AutoZone’s executive compensation programs?

The Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers, as well as the other senior executives

comprising AutoZone’s Executive Committee, participate in the compensation program outlined in this
Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The Executive Committee consists of the Chief Executive Officer and
officers with the title of senior vice president or executive vice president (a total of 13 executives at the end of
fiscal 2018). However, many elements of the compensation program also apply to other levels of AutoZone
management. The intent is to ensure that management is motivated to pursue, and is rewarded for achieving, the
same financial, operating and stockholder objectives.

P
r
o
x
y

What are the key elements of the Company’s overall executive compensation program?

The table below summarizes the key elements of AutoZone’s executive compensation program and the
objectives they are designed to achieve. More details on these elements follow throughout the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis and this Proxy Statement, as appropriate.

Description

Objectives

Base salary

• Annual fixed cash compensation.

Annual cash incentive

• Annual variable pay tied to the
achievement of economic profit
objectives, as operationalized by our
primary measures:
• Earnings before interest and taxes,

and

• Return on invested capital.

• Actual payout depends on the results
achieved. Individual potential payout
is capped at $4 million; however,
payout is zero if threshold targets are
not achieved.

• The Compensation Committee may

reduce payouts in its discretion when
indicated by individual performance
or other reasons, but does not have
discretion to increase payouts.

• Attract and retain talented executives.
• Recognize differences in relative
size, scope and complexity of
positions as well as individual
performance over the long term.

• Communicate key financial and

operating objectives.

• Drive high levels of performance by
ensuring that executives’ total cash
compensation is linked to
achievement of financial and
operating objectives.

• Support and reward consistent,
balanced growth and returns
performance with links to stockholder
returns.

• Drive cross-functional collaboration
and a total-company perspective.

Stock options and
other equity
compensation

• Senior executives receive

• Align long-term compensation with

stockholder results. Opportunities for
significant wealth accumulation by
executives are tightly linked to
stockholder returns.

• Provide retention incentives to ensure
business continuity, and facilitate
succession planning and executive
knowledge transfer.

non-qualified stock options (NQSOs).

• All stock options are granted at fair

market value on the grant date
(discounted options are prohibited).

• AutoZone’s equity compensation
plan prohibits re-pricing of stock
options and does not include a
“reload” program.

• AutoZone may occasionally grant
awards of performance-restricted
stock units, as well as awards
of restricted stock with time-based
vesting.

Stock purchase plans

• AutoZone maintains a broad-based

employee stock purchase plan (ESPP)
which is qualified under Section 423
of the Internal Revenue Code. The
Employee Stock Purchase Plan

• Allow all AutoZoners to participate
in the growth of AutoZone’s stock.

• Encourage ownership, and therefore

alignment of executive and
stockholder interests.

P
r
o
x
y

Description

Objectives

allows AutoZoners to make quarterly
purchases of AutoZone shares at 85%
of the fair market value on the first or
last day of the calendar quarter,
whichever is lower. The annual
contribution limit under the ESPP is
$15,000.

• The Company has implemented an
Executive Stock Purchase Plan so
that executives may continue to
purchase AutoZone shares beyond
the limit the IRS and the Company
set for the Employee Stock Purchase
Plan. An executive may make
purchases using up to 25% of their
prior fiscal year’s eligible
compensation.

• Executive officers must meet
specified minimum levels of
ownership, using a multiple of base
salary approach.

Management stock
ownership requirement

• Encourage ownership by requiring
executive officers to meet specified
levels of ownership.

• Alignment of executive and

stockholder interests.

Retirement plans

• The Company maintains two

• Provide competitive executive

retirement plans:

retirement benefits.

• 401(k) defined contribution plan;

and

• Non-qualified deferred
compensation plan

• During fiscal 2018, the Company

terminated its frozen defined benefit
retirement plans, as described under
Pension Benefits on page 39.

• The non-qualified plan enables
executives to defer 25% of base
salary and 75% of annual cash
incentives, independent of the IRS
limitations set for the qualified
401(k) plan.

Health and other
benefits

• Executives are eligible for a variety

• Provide competitive benefits.

of benefits, including:

• Minimize perquisites while ensuring

• Medical, dental and vision plans;

• Life and disability insurance plans;

a competitive overall rewards
package.

and

• Charitable contribution match

program.

Annual cash compensation. Annual cash compensation consists of base salary and annual cash incentives.

Base Salary. Salaries are determined within the context of a targeted total cash compensation level for

each position. Base salary is a fixed portion of the targeted annual cash compensation, with the specific portion
varying based on differences in the size, scope or complexity of the jobs as well as the tenure and individual
performance level of incumbents in the positions. Points are assigned to positions using a job evaluation system

developed by Korn Ferry Hay Group (“Hay Group”), a global management and human resources consulting
firm, and AutoZone maintains salary ranges based on these job evaluations. These salary ranges are usually
updated annually based on broad-based survey data; in addition to Hay Group survey data, AutoZone also
subscribes to survey information from a variety of providers for this purpose, as discussed below.

The survey data used to periodically adjust salary ranges is broad-based, including data submitted by

hundreds of companies. Examples of the types of information contained in salary surveys include summary
statistics (e.g., mean, median, 25th percentile, etc.) related to:

P
r
o
x
y

• base salaries

• variable compensation

• total annual cash compensation

• long-term incentive compensation

• total direct compensation

The salary surveys cover both the retail industry and compensation data on a broader, more general public

company universe. Multiple salary surveys are used, so that ultimately the data represent hundreds of companies
and positions and thousands of incumbents, or people holding those positions. The surveys generally list the
participating companies, and for each position “matched”, the number of companies and incumbents associated
with the position. Subscribers cannot determine which information comes from which company.

The salary ranges which apply to the Named Executive Officers, including the Principal Executive Officer,

are part of the structure applicable to thousands of AutoZone’s employees. AutoZone positions are each
assigned to a salary grade. This is generally accomplished at the creation of a position, using the Hay Group job
evaluation method, and jobs tend to remain in the same grade as long as there are no significant job content
changes. Each grade in the current salary structure has a salary range associated with it. This range has a
midpoint, to which we compare summary market salary data (generally median pay level) of the types discussed
above.

Over time, as the median pay levels in the competitive market change, as evidenced by the salary survey
data, AutoZone will make appropriate adjustments to salary range midpoints so that on average, these midpoints
are positioned at roughly 95% of the market median value as revealed by the surveys. This positioning relative
to the market allows for competitive base salary levels, while generally leaving actual average base pay slightly
below the survey market level. This fits our stated philosophy of delivering competitive total rewards at or
above the market median through performance-based variable compensation.

In making decisions related to compensation of the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation
Committee uses the survey data and salary ranges as context in reviewing compensation levels and approving
pay actions. Other elements that the Compensation Committee considers are individual performance, Company
performance, individual tenure, internal equity, position tenure, and succession planning.

Annual Cash Incentive. Executive officers and certain other employees are eligible to receive annual cash

incentives each fiscal year based on the Company’s attainment of certain Company performance objectives set
by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the fiscal year. The annual cash incentive target for each
position, expressed as a percentage of base salary, is based on both salary range and level within the
organization, and therefore does not change annually. As a general rule, as an executive’s level of management
responsibility increases, the portion of his or her total compensation dependent on Company performance
increases.

P
r
o
x
y

The threshold and target percentage amounts for the Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2018 are shown in

the table below.

Principal Position

Chairman, President & CEO

Executive Vice President

Threshold Target

62.5% 125%

37.5%

75%

Annual cash incentives for executive officers are paid pursuant to the AutoZone, Inc. 2015 Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan (“EICP”), our performance-based short-term incentive plan. Pursuant to the plan,
the Compensation Committee establishes incentive objectives at the beginning of each fiscal year. For more
information about the EICP, see Discussion of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 35.

The actual incentive amount paid depends on Company performance relative to the target objectives. A
minimum pre-established goal must be met in order for any incentive award to be paid, and the incentive award
as a percentage of annual salary will increase as the Company achieves higher levels of performance.

The Compensation Committee may in its sole discretion reduce the calculated incentive awards paid to

Named Executive Officers. Under the EICP, the Compensation Committee may not exercise discretion in
granting awards in cases where no awards are indicated, nor may the Compensation Committee increase any
calculated awards. Any such “positive” discretionary changes, were they to occur, would be paid outside of the
EICP and reported under the appropriate Bonus column in the Summary Compensation Table on page 32;
however, the Compensation Committee has not historically exercised this discretion.

The Compensation Committee, as described in the EICP, may (but is not required to) disregard the effect of

one-time charges and extraordinary events such as asset write-downs, litigation judgments or settlements,
changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, accruals for
reorganization or restructuring, and any other extraordinary non-recurring items, acquisitions or divestitures and
any foreign exchange gains or losses on the calculation of performance.

The incentive objectives for fiscal 2018 were set during a September 2017 Compensation Committee
meeting, and were based on the achievement of specified levels of earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”)
and return on invested capital (“ROIC”), as are the incentive objectives for fiscal 2019, which were set during a
Compensation Committee meeting held in September 2018. The total incentive award is determined based on
the impact of EBIT and ROIC on AutoZone’s economic profit for the year, rather than by a simple allocation of
a portion of the award to achievement of the EBIT target and a portion to achievement of the ROIC target. EBIT
and ROIC are key inputs to the calculation of economic profit (sometimes referred to as “economic value
added”), and have been determined by our Compensation Committee to be important factors in enhancing
stockholder value. If both the EBIT and ROIC targets are achieved, the result will be a 100%, or target, payout.
However, the payout cannot exceed 100% unless the EBIT target is exceeded (i.e., unless there is “excess EBIT”
to fund the additional incentive payout). Additionally, when the aggregate incentive amount is calculated, if the
resulting payout amount in excess of target exceeds a specified percentage of excess EBIT (currently 20%), then
the incentive payout will be reduced until the total amount of the incentive payment in excess of target is within
that specified limit.

The specific targets are tied to achievement of the Company’s operating plan for the fiscal year. In 2018,

the target objectives were EBIT of $2,152 million and ROIC of 27.5%. The 2018 incentive awards for each
named executive officer were based on the following performance:

EICP Target . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actual (as adjusted) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Difference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,152.0
2,141.6
(10.5)

27.5%
28.3%

83 bps

EBIT ($MMs)

ROIC

Effect of Performance on Total Annual Cash Compensation. Because AutoZone emphasizes pay for

performance, it is only when the Company exceeds its target objectives that an executive’s total annual cash

P
r
o
x
y

compensation begins to climb relative to the median market level. Similarly, Company performance below
target will cause an executive’s total annual cash compensation to drop below market median. As discussed
below, AutoZone does not engage in strict benchmarking of compensation levels, i.e., we do not use specific
data to support precise targeting of compensation, such as setting an executive’s base pay at the 50th percentile
of an identified group of companies.

Incentive Compensation Recovery Policy. During fiscal 2017, AutoZone implemented an incentive
compensation recovery, or “clawback”, policy. The purpose of the policy is to enable AutoZone’s Board, at its
discretion, to recover excess incentive compensation in the event that the Company is required to prepare an
accounting restatement to correct an error that is material to the previously issued financial statements. “Excess”
compensation is generally the amount of performance-based compensation paid above what would have been
received had the statements in question been accurate. The Company will revise and administer this policy in
compliance with the Dodd-Frank Act provisions, once the rules implementing those provisions become
effective.

Stock compensation. To emphasize achievement of long-term stockholder value, AutoZone’s executives

receive a significant portion of their targeted total compensation in the form of non-qualified stock options.
Although stock options have potential worth at the time they are granted, they only confer actual value if
AutoZone’s stock price appreciates between the grant date and the exercise date. For this reason, we believe
stock options are a highly effective long-term compensation vehicle to reward executives for creating
stockholder value. We want our executives to realize total compensation levels well above the market norm,
because when they do, such success is the result of achievement of Company financial and operating objectives
that leads to growth in the per-share value of AutoZone common stock.

AutoZone grants stock options annually. Currently, the annual grants are reviewed and approved by the
Compensation Committee in the meeting (typically in late September or early October) at which it reviews prior
year results, determines incentive payouts, and takes other compensation actions affecting its executive officers.
The Compensation Committee has not delegated its authority to grant stock options; all grants are directly
approved by the Compensation Committee. Option grant amounts for the Chief Executive Officer’s direct
reports and other senior executives are recommended to the Compensation Committee by the Chief Executive
Officer, based on individual performance and the size and scope of the position held. AutoZone’s practice is to
limit the total option shares granted to its employees during the annual grant process to approximately one
percent of common shares outstanding. The annual grant is typically made near the beginning of the fiscal year
and does not include a limited number of promotional or new hire grants that may be made during the fiscal
year. The Compensation Committee reserves the right to deviate from this policy as it deems appropriate.

Newly promoted or hired officers may receive an option grant shortly after their hire or promotion. New

hire or promotional stock options are individually approved at a regularly scheduled meeting of the
Compensation Committee, or by unanimous written consent of the Compensation Committee. The grants are
recommended to the Compensation Committee by the Chief Executive Officer based on individual
circumstances (e.g., what may be required in order to attract a new executive). Internal promotional grants are
prorated based on the time elapsed since the officer received a regular annual grant of stock options.

On October 7, 2015, the Compensation Committee authorized a one-time award of 50,000 nonqualified
stock options to Mr. Rhodes. The options, which have an expiration date of October 8, 2025, vest in one-half
increments on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant. The purpose of this one-time award is to solidify
Mr. Rhodes’ commitment to AutoZone as well as to motivate continued high performance in a way that is
aligned with both stockholder results as well as AutoZone’s leadership team incentives.

Stock purchase plans. AutoZone maintains the Seventh Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. Employee

Stock Purchase Plan (“Employee Stock Purchase Plan”) which enables all employees to purchase AutoZone
common stock at a discount, subject to IRS-determined limitations. Based on IRS rules, we limit the annual
purchases in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan to no more than $15,000, and no more than 10% of eligible
compensation. To support and encourage stock ownership by our executives, AutoZone also established a

non-qualified stock purchase plan. The AutoZone, Inc. Sixth Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase
Plan (“Executive Stock Purchase Plan”) permits participants to acquire AutoZone common stock in excess of
the purchase limits contained in AutoZone’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Because the Executive Stock
Purchase Plan is not required to comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, it
has a higher limit on the percentage of a participant’s compensation that may be used to purchase shares (25%)
and places no dollar limit on the amount of a participant’s compensation that may be used to purchase shares
under the plan.

The Executive Stock Purchase Plan operates in a similar manner to the tax-qualified Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, in that it allows executives to contribute after-tax compensation for use in making quarterly
purchases of AutoZone common stock. Options are granted under the Executive Stock Purchase Plan each
calendar quarter and consist of two parts: a restricted share option and an unvested share option. Shares are
purchased under the restricted share option at 100% of the closing price of AutoZone stock at the end of the
calendar quarter (i.e., not at a discount), and a number of shares are issued under the unvested share option at no
cost to the executive, so that the total number of shares acquired upon exercise of both options is equivalent to
the number of shares that could have been purchased with the contributions at a price equal to 85% of the stock
price at the end of the quarter. The unvested shares are subject to forfeiture if the executive does not remain with
the company for one year after the grant date. After one year, the shares vest, and the executive owes taxes
based on the share price on the vesting date (unless a so-called 83(b) election was made on the date of grant).

The table below can be used to compare and contrast the stock purchase plans. For more information about

our stock-based plans, including the Executive Stock Purchase Plan, see Discussion of Plan-Based Awards
Table on page 35.

P
r
o
x
y

Contributions

Discount

Vesting

Taxes — Individual

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Executive Stock Purchase Plan

After tax, limited to lower of 10%
of eligible compensation or
$15,000

After tax, limited to 25% of
eligible compensation

15% discount based on lowest
price at beginning or end of the
quarter

None (one-year holding period
only)

Ordinary income in amount of
spread; capital gains for
appreciation; taxed when shares
sold

15% discount based on
quarter-end price

Shares granted to represent 15%
discount vest after one year;
one-year holding period for
shares purchased at fair market
value

Ordinary income when
restrictions lapse (83(b) election
optional)

Taxes — Company

No deduction unless
“disqualifying disposition”

Deduction when included in
employee’s income

How does the Compensation Committee consider and determine executive and director compensation?

Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee establishes the compensation level for the Chief

Executive Officer, including base salary, annual cash incentive compensation, and stock-based awards. The
Chief Executive Officer’s compensation is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee in conjunction
with a review of his individual performance by the non-management directors, taking into account all forms of
compensation, including base salary, annual cash incentive, stock options and other stock-based awards, and the
value of other benefits received.

Other Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves base salaries for

AutoZone’s executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer) based on each executive officer’s

individual performance during the past fiscal year and on the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer.
The Compensation Committee approves the annual cash incentive amounts for the executive officers, which are
determined by objectives approved by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year as
discussed above. The actual incentive amount paid depends on performance relative to the target objectives.

P
r
o
x
y

The Compensation Committee approves awards of stock options to many levels of management, including
executive officers. Stock options are granted to executive officers upon initial hire or promotion, and thereafter
are typically granted annually in accordance with guidelines established by the Compensation Committee as
discussed above. The actual grant is determined by the Compensation Committee based on the guidelines and
the performance of the individual in the position. The Compensation Committee considers the recommendations
of the Chief Executive Officer. Other than grants of stock made pursuant to the stock purchase plans discussed
above, from time to time the Compensation Committee has sole authority to approve any other individual
awards of stock-based compensation.

Management Stock Ownership Requirement. To further reinforce AutoZone’s objective of driving long-

term stockholder results, AutoZone maintains a stock ownership requirement for all Executive Committee
members (a total of 13 individuals at the end of fiscal 2018). Covered executives must attain a specified
minimum level of stock ownership, based on a multiple of their base salary, within 5 years of the executive’s
placement into a covered position. Executives who are promoted into a position with a higher multiple will have
an additional 3 years to attain the increased required ownership level. In order to calculate whether each
executive meets the ownership requirement, we total the value of each executive’s holdings of whole shares of
stock and the intrinsic (or “in-the-money”) value of vested stock options, based on the fiscal year-end closing
price of AutoZone stock, and compare that value to the appropriate multiple of fiscal year-end base salary. As of
the date of this Proxy Statement, all Executive Committee members exceed the ownership requirement.

To encourage full participation in our equity plans, all AutoZone stock acquired under those plans is
included in the executive’s holdings for purposes of calculating his or her ownership. This includes vested stock
options and vested shares which have restrictions on sale.

Key features of the stock ownership requirement are summarized in the table below:

Ownership Requirement

• Chief Executive Officer

• Executive Vice President

• Senior Vice President

5 times base salary

3 times base salary

2 times base salary

Holding Requirements

• Individuals who have not achieved the ownership requirement within
the specified period will be required to hold 50% of net after-tax
shares upon exercise of any stock option, and may not sell any shares
of AZO.

• Guidelines will no longer apply after an executive reaches age 62, in

order to facilitate appropriate financial planning as potential
retirement approaches. The Compensation Committee may waive the
guidelines for any other executive at its discretion.

Ownership Definition

• Shares of stock directly owned;

• Unvested Shares acquired via the Executive Stock Purchase Plan; and

• Vested stock options (based on the “in-the-money” value).

Are there any restrictions on the ability of our executive officers to engage in transactions involving our
stock?

AutoZone has adopted comprehensive and detailed policies that regulate trading in our securities by our
officers, directors and employees, including blackout periods when trading in our securities is not permitted.

P
r
o
x
y

AutoZone’s officers, directors, and employees are strictly prohibited from hedging our securities. Directors,
Named Executive Officers and other senior executives are strictly prohibited from pledging our securities as
collateral.

What roles do the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers play in the determination of
executive compensation?

The Chief Executive Officer attends most meetings of the Compensation Committee and participates in the

process by answering Compensation Committee questions about pay philosophy and by ensuring that the
Compensation Committee’s requests for information are fulfilled. He also assists the Compensation Committee
in determining the compensation of the executive officers by providing recommendations and input about such
matters as individual performance, tenure, and size, scope and complexity of their positions. The Chief
Executive Officer makes specific recommendations to the Compensation Committee concerning the
compensation of his direct reports and other senior executives, including the executive officers. These
recommendations usually relate to base salary increases, changes to annual incentive targets and stock option
grants. The Chief Executive Officer also recommends pay packages for newly hired executives. Management
provides the Compensation Committee with data, analyses and perspectives on market trends and annually
prepares information to assist the Compensation Committee in its consideration of such recommendations.
Annual incentive awards are based on achievement of business objectives set by the Compensation Committee,
but the Compensation Committee may exercise negative discretion, and if it does so, it is typically in reliance on
the Chief Executive Officer’s assessment of an individual’s performance.

The Chief Executive Officer is not a party to the deliberations of the Compensation Committee regarding

his own compensation. The Senior Vice President, Human Resources has direct discussions with the
Compensation Committee Chair regarding the Compensation Committee’s recommendations on the Chief
Executive Officer’s compensation. The Compensation Committee may seek input from the Chief Executive
Officer regarding his compensation; however, Compensation Committee discussions of specific pay actions
related to the Chief Executive Officer are held outside his presence.

Does AutoZone use compensation consultants?

The Compensation Committee has authority, pursuant to its charter, to hire consultants of its selection to

advise it with respect to AutoZone’s compensation programs, and it may also limit the use of the Compensation
Committee’s compensation consultants by AutoZone’s management as it deems appropriate. Although
historically AutoZone has hired consultants to provide services from time to time, it is not AutoZone’s usual
practice, and, neither the Compensation Committee nor AutoZone’s management regularly engages consultants
as part of the annual review and determination of executive compensation.

What are AutoZone’s peer group and compensation benchmarking practices?

AutoZone reviews publicly-available data from a peer group of companies to help us ensure that our overall

compensation remains competitive. The peer group data we use is from proxy filings and other published
sources – it is not prepared or compiled especially for AutoZone.

We periodically review the appropriateness of this peer group. It typically has changed when such events as

acquisitions and spin-offs have occurred, and in the event a member company experiences significant
performance challenges. The criteria used to select the peer group companies include:

• Direct competitors;

• Companies with which we compete for talent, customers and capital; and

• Companies with key financial measures within a reasonable range compared to those same measures for

AutoZone (e.g., revenues between 50% and 200% of AutoZone’s).

P
r
o
x
y

Advance Auto Parts
Bed Bath & Beyond
Darden Restaurants
Dick’s Sporting Goods
Dollar General
Dollar Tree
Foot Locker

AutoZone Peer Group

Gamestop
Gap Stores
Genuine Parts
L Brands
LKQ Corporation
O’Reilly Automotive

Ross Stores
Sherwin Williams
Starbucks
Tractor Supply Company
W.W. Grainger
Yum! Brands

We do not use information from the peer group or other published sources to set precise compensation
targets or make individual compensation decisions. AutoZone does not engage in “benchmarking,” such as
targeting base salary at peer group median for a given position. Rather we use such data as context in reviewing
AutoZone’s overall compensation levels and approving recommended compensation actions. Broad survey data
and peer group information are just two elements that we find useful in maintaining a reasonable and
competitive compensation program. Other elements that we consider are individual performance, Company
performance, individual tenure, position tenure, and succession planning.

What is AutoZone’s policy concerning the taxation of compensation?

Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform”) that was signed into law December 22, 2017, the

Compensation Committee considered the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code which
allowed the Company to take an income tax deduction for compensation up to $1 million and for certain
compensation exceeding $1 million paid in any taxable year to a “covered employee” as that term is defined in
the Code. There was an exception for qualified performance-based compensation, and AutoZone’s
compensation program was designed to maximize the tax deductibility of compensation paid to executive
officers, where possible. The Tax Reform includes substantial changes to Section 162(m), which generally
eliminate tax deductions for any compensation in excess of $1 million paid to covered employees.

The Tax Reform allows certain compensation to be grandfathered, which will enable the Company to
continue to take a tax deduction for amounts exceeding $1 million. Fiscal 2018-related payments made pursuant
to AutoZone’s Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, as well as the stock options granted to the Company’s
named executive officers through fiscal 2018 under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan, should qualify as
performance-based compensation. However, final guidance from the Internal Revenue Service is required for
confirmation. Base salaries (less deferred compensation), restricted stock awards, Executive Stock Purchase
Plan vested shares, and certain benefits and perquisites do not qualify as performance-based under 162(m). For
fiscal 2018, the sum of this compensation for each of AutoZone’s “covered employees” did not exceed
$1 million; therefore, the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and the other “covered employees” was
fully deductible.

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code was created with the passage of the American Jobs Creation

Act of 2004. These tax regulations create strict rules related to non-qualified deferred compensation earned and
vested on or after January 1, 2005. The Internal Revenue Service periodically releases Notices and other
guidance related to Section 409A, and AutoZone continues to take actions necessary to comply with the
Section’s requirements by the deadlines established by the Internal Revenue Service.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has reviewed and discussed
with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”). Based on the review and discussions,
the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement.

P
r
o
x
y

Members of the Compensation Committee:
George R. Mrkonic, Jr. (Chair)
Douglas H. Brooks
Linda A. Goodspeed
Gale V. King
W. Andrew McKenna

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent, non-employee directors. The members

of the Compensation Committee of the Board during the 2018 fiscal year are listed above.

Compensation Program Risk Assessment

AutoZone’s management conducts periodic assessments of the compensation plans and programs that apply

throughout the Company, including those plans and programs in which our executives participate. The
assessments are performed by key members of AutoZone’s human resources, finance, operations, and legal
teams, and entails thorough discussions of each plan’s or program’s design and operation. Significant findings
are reviewed by senior management prior to being reviewed and discussed with the Compensation Committee.

Plan elements which are reviewed include participants, performance measures, performance and payout
curves or formulas, how target level performance is determined (including whether any thresholds and caps
exist), how frequently payouts occur, and the mix of fixed and variable compensation which the plan delivers.
The plans and programs are also reviewed from the standpoint of reasonableness (e.g., how target and above-
target pay levels compare to similar plans for similar populations at other companies, and how payout amounts
relate to the results which generate the payment), how well the plans and programs are aligned with AutoZone’s
goals and objectives, and from an overall standpoint, whether these plans and programs represent an appropriate
mix of short- and long-term compensation.

The purpose of these reviews is to determine whether the risks related to the design and operation of these

plans and programs, if present, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. We
believe that our compensation plans, policies and practices do not encourage excessive risk-taking and are not
reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The various mitigating factors which
support this conclusion include:

• Oversight of the management incentive plan and all stock-based compensation by the Compensation

Committee of the Board;

• Senior management oversight of key plans and programs, including approving target level payouts,

setting financial and operating goals, and approving payouts;

• Administration and oversight of plans and programs by multiple functions within the Company (e.g.,

finance, operations, legal and human resources);

• Existence of an incentive compensation recovery (“clawback”) policy;

• Interrelationship between measures (e.g., correlation between economic profit performance and

appreciation in the per-share price of AutoZone’s stock);

• Vesting and stock ownership requirements for executive officers which encourage long-term perspectives

among participants; and

• A preference for performance measures which result in payments only upon achievement of ultimate

financial results.

P
r
o
x
y

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

This table shows the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers during the 2018, 2017 and 2016

fiscal years.

Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary
($)

Bonus
($)(1)

Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3)

Option
Awards
($)(3)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)

William C. Rhodes III . . . . . . . . 2018 1,000,000 — 89,621
1,735,439
2017 1,000,000 — 89,920
1,054,789
2016 1,000,000 — 90,300 12,490,176

Chairman, President &
Chief Executive Officer

1,250,000
1,018,750
1,543,750

William T. Giles . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018
CFO/Executive Vice President, 2017
2016
Finance & IT
William W. Graves . . . . . . . . . . . 2018
2017
2016

Executive Vice President,
Mexico, Brazil & Store
Development

Mark A. Finestone . . . . . . . . . . . 2018
2017
2016

Executive Vice President,
Merchandising, Supply
Chain & Marketing

Thomas B. Newbern . . . . . . . . . . 2018
2017
2016

Executive Vice President,
Store Operations, Commercial,
ALLDATA & Loss Prevention

641,923 — 26,717
622,387 — 27,507
601,090 — 27,452

528,962 — 14,540
512,692 — 17,550
492,154 — 18,637

1,259,639
1,425,138
1,737,659

1,068,741
1,209,492
1,475,371

528,962 — 13,663
512,692 — 18,997
492,154 — 26,373

1,068,741
1,209,492
1,803,231

528,962 —
512,692 —
492,154 —

— 1,068,741
— 1,209,492
— 1,803,231

481,443
380,435
556,761

396,722
313,383
446,624

Change In
Pension Value
& Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(5)

All Other
Compensation
($)(6)

Total
($)

—
—
39,196

—
—
—

—
1,179
28,313

—
—
—

—
1,425
66,149

145,559
171,779
186,549

98,400
104,553
104,348

91,555
96,955
97,232

90,291
92,991
94,412

56,346
67,425
57,519

4,220,619
3,335,238
15,349,971

2,508,122
2,560,020
3,027,310

2,100,520
2,151,251
2,558,331

2,098,379
2,147,555
2,862,794

2,050,771
2,104,417
2,865,677

(1) Annual incentive awards were paid pursuant to the EICP and therefore appear in the “non-equity incentive

plan compensation” column of the table.

(2) Represents shares acquired pursuant to the Executive Stock Purchase Plan. See “Compensation Discussion
and Analysis” on page 20 for more information about the Executive Stock Purchase Plan. See Note B,
Share-Based Payments, to our consolidated financial statements in our 2018 Annual Report for a description
of the Executive Stock Purchase Plan and the accounting and assumptions used in calculating expenses in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(3) The value of stock awards and option awards was determined as required by FASB ASC Topic 718. There is
no assurance that these values will be realized. See Note B, Share-Based Payments, to our consolidated
financial statements in our 2018 Annual Report for details on assumptions used in the valuation.

(4) Incentive amounts were earned for the 2018 fiscal year pursuant to the EICP and were paid in October 2018.

See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 20 for more information about this plan.

(5) During fiscal 2018, the Company terminated the defined benefit pension plans; as a result, there is no

actuarial present value to report for fiscal year end. See the Pension Benefits table on page 39 for more
information, including the values of lump sum payments made to eligible executives. We did not provide
above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation in 2018, 2017 or 2016.

P
r
o
x
y

(6) All Other Compensation includes the following:

Name

William C. Rhodes III

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

William T. Giles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

William W. Graves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Mark A. Finestone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Thomas B. Newbern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Perquisites
and Personal
Benefits
($)(A)

60,090(B)
61,516(B)
64,728(B)
55,475(B)
55,127(B)
45,943(B)
57,017(B)
57,733(B)
59,833(B)
54,851(B)
53,806(B)
58,319(B)
18,250
25,549
18,216

Tax
Gross-
ups
($)(C)

—
3,113
5,641
—
—
2,431
—
131
2,431
—
—
2,431
3,449
3,014
5,641

2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016
2018
2017
2016

Company
Contributions to
Defined
Contribution
Plans
($)(D)

Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)

80,788
101,750
100,300
40,640
46,969
42,973
33,458
38,011
30,235
33,567
37,782
30,245
33,567
37,782
30,245

4,681
5,400
15,880
2,285
2,457
13,001
1,080
1,080
4,733
1,873
1,403
3,417
1,080
1,080
3,417

(A) Perquisites and personal benefits for all Named Executive Officers include Company-provided home
security system and/or monitoring services, airline club memberships and status upgrades, Company-
paid spouse business-related travel, Company-paid long-term disability insurance premiums, and
matching charitable contributions under the AutoZone Matching Gift Program.

(B) The perquisites or personal benefits which exceeded the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount
of perquisites and personal benefits for an executive officer, which consisted of matching charitable
contributions made under the AutoZone Matching Gift program, under which executives may
contribute to qualified charitable organizations and AutoZone provides a matching contribution to the
charities in an equal amount, up to $50,000 in the aggregate for each executive officer annually, are as
follows:

Name

William C. Rhodes III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
William T. Giles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
William W. Graves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mark A. Finestone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2018
($)

50,000
50,000
50,000
49,000

2017
($)

50,000
50,000
50,000
48,024

2016
($)

50,000
38,000
50,000
50,000

(D) Represents employer contributions to the AutoZone, Inc. 401(k) Plan and the AutoZone, Inc.

Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table sets forth information regarding plan-based awards granted to the Company’s Named

Executive Officers during the 2018 fiscal year.

P
r
o
x
y

Name

Estimated Future Payments
Under Non-equity Incentive
Plans(1)

Threshold
($)

Target
($)

Maximum
($)

Equity
Plans
Grant Date

All other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
shares of
Stock or
Units (#)
(2)

All other
Option
Awards:
Number of
securities
underlying
options (#)
(3)

Exercise
or
base
price of
option
awards
($)

Grant
date fair
value of
stock
and
option
awards
($)

William C. Rhodes III . . . . . .

625,000 1,250,000 N/A

9/26/2017
9/30/2017
12/31/2017
3/31/2018
6/30/2018

William T. Giles . . . . . . . . . .

241,875

483,750 N/A

9/26/2017
9/30/2017
12/31/2017
3/31/2018
6/30/2018

William W. Graves . . . . . . . .

199,313

398,625 N/A

9/26/2017
9/30/2017
12/31/2017
3/31/2018
6/30/2018

Mark A. Finestone . . . . . . . .

199,313

398,625 N/A

9/26/2017
9/30/2017
12/31/2017
3/31/2018
6/30/2018

Thomas B. Newbern . . . . . . .

199,313

398,625 N/A

9/26/2017

21
76
19
16

12
9
11
9

2
16
2
1

6
4
6
5

12,000

8,710

7,390

587.13 1,735,439
12,497
54,064
12,325
10,735

1,825,060

587.13 1,259,639
7,141
6,402
7,136
6,038

1,286,356

587.13 1,068,741
1,190
11,382
1,297
671

1,083,281

587.13 1,068,741
3,571
2,845
3,892
3,355

1,082,404

7,390

587.13 1,068,741

1,068,741

(1) Represents potential threshold, target and maximum incentive compensation for the 2018 fiscal year under

the EICP based on each officer’s salary on the date the 2018 fiscal year targets were approved. The amounts
actually paid for the 2018 fiscal year are described in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”
column in the Summary Compensation Table. The “threshold” is the minimum payment level under the
EICP which is 50% of the target amount. There is no overall percentage maximum; however, awards paid to
any individual pursuant to the EICP may not exceed $4 million. See “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis” at page 20 and the discussion following this table for more information on the EICP.

(2) Represents shares awarded pursuant to the Executive Stock Purchase Plan. See “Compensation Discussion
and Analysis” at page 20 and the discussion following this table for more information on the Executive
Stock Purchase Plan.

(3) Represents options awarded pursuant to the Amended 2011 Equity Plan. See “Compensation Discussion and

Analysis” at page 20 and the discussion following this table for more information on equity plans.

Discussion of Plan-Based Awards Table

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. The EICP was designed to be a performance-based

compensation plan under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company’s executive officers, as
determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board, are eligible to participate in the EICP. At the
beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee establishes a goal, which may be a range from a
minimum to a maximum attainable bonus, based on one or more of the following measures:

P
r
o
x
y

• Earnings
• Earnings per share
• Sales
• Market share
• Operating or net cash flows
• Pre-tax profits
• Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT)

• Return on invested capital
• Economic value added
• Return on inventory
• EBIT margin
• Sales per square foot
• Comparable store sales

The EICP provides that the goal may be different for different executives. The goals can change annually to
support our business objectives. After the end of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee must certify the
attainment of goals under the EICP and direct the amount to be paid to each participant in cash. The EICP, along
with other plans designed in accordance with Section 162(m), will be reviewed for needed changes as guidance
is released by the Internal Revenue Service. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 20 for more
information about the EICP.

Executive Stock Purchase Plan. The Executive Stock Purchase Plan permits participants to acquire
AutoZone common stock in excess of the purchase limits contained in AutoZone’s Employee Stock Purchase
Plan. Because the Executive Stock Purchase Plan is not required to comply with the requirements of Section 423
of the Internal Revenue Code, it has a higher limit on the percentage of a participant’s compensation that may be
used to purchase shares (25%) and places no dollar limit on the amount of a participant’s compensation that may
be used to purchase shares under the plan. For more information about the Executive Stock Purchase Plan, see
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 20.

Stock Options. Stock options are awarded to many levels of management, including executive officers, to
align the long-term interests of AutoZone’s management and our stockholders. During the 2018 fiscal year, 781
AutoZone employees received stock options. The stock options shown in the table were granted pursuant to the
Amended 2011 Equity Plan.

Both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options, or a combination of both, can be granted

under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan. Incentive stock options have a maximum term of ten years, and
non-qualified stock options have a maximum term of ten years and one day. The stock options subject to
Mr. Rhodes’ one-time grant in 2015 vest in equal increments on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant
date. All options granted during the 2018 fiscal year vest in one-fourth increments over a four-year period. All
options granted under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of
AutoZone common stock on the date of grant, which is defined as the closing price on the grant date. Option
repricing is expressly prohibited by the terms of the Amended 2011 Equity Plan.

Each grant of stock options is governed by the terms of a Stock Option Agreement entered into between the

Company and the executive officer at the time of the grant. The Stock Option Agreements provide vesting
schedules and other terms of the grants in accordance with the Amended 2011 Equity Plan.

P
r
o
x
y

Under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan, participants may receive equity-based compensation in the form of

stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units, dividend equivalents, deferred stock, stock
payments, performance share awards and other incentive awards structured by the Compensation Committee and
the Board within parameters set forth in the Amended 2011 Equity Plan.

The aggregate number of shares of AutoZone common stock available for equity grants pursuant to the

Amended 2011 Equity Plan will be reduced by two shares for every share delivered in settlement of an award
other than (i) a stock option, (ii) a stock appreciation right or (iii) any other award for which the holder pays the
intrinsic value existing as of the date of grant (such awards, “Full Value Awards”). To the extent that any award
other than a Full Value Award is forfeited, expires or is settled in cash without the delivery of shares to the
holder, then any shares subject to the award will again be available for the grant of an award pursuant to the
Amended 2011 Equity Plan; if such forfeited, expired or cash-settled award is a Full Value Award, then the
number of shares available under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan will be increased by two shares for each share
subject to the award that is forfeited, expired or cash-settled. However, shares tendered or withheld in payment
of the exercise price of an option or in satisfaction of any tax withholding obligations with respect to an award,
shares subject to a stock appreciation right that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the
stock appreciation right on exercise thereof, and shares purchased on the open market with the cash proceeds
from the exercise of options, will not again be available for the grant of an award pursuant to the Amended 2011
Equity Plan. Any shares of restricted stock repurchased by AutoZone at the same price paid by the participant,
so that such shares are returned to AutoZone, will again be available for awards granted pursuant to the
Amended 2011 Equity Plan. The payment of dividend equivalents in cash in conjunction with any outstanding
awards will not be counted against the shares available for issuance under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding stock option awards under the Amended
2011 Equity Plan, the 2011 Equity Plan, the AutoZone, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan the (“2006 Stock Option
Plan”), other outstanding equity awards under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan and the 2011 Equity Plan, and
unvested shares under the Executive Stock Purchase Plan for the Company’s Named Executive Officers as of
August 25, 2018:

Name

Grant Date

Exercisable Unexercisable

Number of securities
underlying unexercised
options(1)

Number
of shares of
stock that
have
not vested(2)

Market
value
of shares
of stock
that have
not
vested(3)

Option
Exercise
Price

Option
Expiration
Date

Option Awards

Stock Awards

P
r
o
x
y

William C. Rhodes III . . . . . . .

9/29/2010
9/27/2011
9/27/2012
10/1/2013
9/23/2014
10/6/2015
10/7/2015
9/23/2016
9/26/2017
9/30/2017
12/31/2017
3/31/2018
6/30/2018

23,700
20,800
22,500
19,200
13,050
3,924

— $228.20 9/30/2020
— $326.00 9/28/2021
— $371.47 9/28/2022
— $425.11 10/2/2023
$507.79 9/24/2024
$744.62 10/7/2025
— 50,000(4) $736.00 10/8/2025
$744.85 9/24/2026
$587.13 9/27/2027

5,063
— 12,000

4,350
3,926

1,687

Totals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104,861

75,339

William T. Giles . . . . . . . . . . . .

13,500
125
12,000
13,600
11,600
7,950
5,300
2,280
—

— $225.74 9/29/2020
— $326.00 9/27/2021
— $326.00 9/28/2021
— $371.47 9/28/2022
— $425.11 10/2/2023
$507.79 9/24/2024
$744.62 10/7/2025
$744.85 9/24/2026
$587.13 9/27/2027

2,650
5,300
6,840
8,710

9/28/2010
9/27/2011
9/27/2011
9/27/2012
10/1/2013
9/23/2014
10/6/2015
9/23/2016
9/26/2017
9/30/2017
12/31/2017
3/31/2018
6/30/2018

Totals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66,355

23,500

William W. Graves . . . . . . . . . .

9,500
9,400
8,700
5,925
4,500
1,935
—

— $326.00 9/28/2021
— $371.47 9/28/2022
— $425.11 10/2/2023
$507.79 9/24/2024
$744.62 10/7/2025
$744.85 9/24/2026
$587.13 9/27/2027

1,975
4,500
5,805
7,390

9/27/2011
9/27/2012
10/1/2013
9/23/2014
10/6/2015
9/23/2016
9/26/2017
9/30/2017
12/31/2017
3/31/2018
6/30/2018

Totals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39,960

19,670

21
76
19
16
132

$ 16,181
$ 58,560
$ 14,640
$ 12,328
$101,709

12
9
11
9
41

2
16
2
1
21

9,246
$
6,935
$
8,476
$
$
6,935
$ 31,592

$
1,541
$ 12,328
1,541
$
$
771
$ 16,181

P
r
o
x
y

Name

Grant Date

Exercisable Unexercisable

Number of securities
underlying unexercised
options(1)

Number
of shares of
stock that
have
not vested(2)

Market
value
of shares
of stock
that have
not
vested(3)

Option
Exercise
Price

Option
Expiration
Date

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Mark A. Finestone . . . . . . . . . .

Totals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Thomas B. Newbern . . . . . . . . .

Totals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9/27/2011
9/27/2012
10/1/2013
9/23/2014
10/6/2015
9/23/2016
9/26/2017
9/30/2017
12/31/2017
3/31/2018
6/30/2018

9/27/2012
10/1/2013
9/23/2014
10/6/2015
9/23/2016
9/26/2017

11,800
9,400
8,700
5,925
5,500
1,935
—

43,260

2,350
4,350
3,950
5,500
1,935
—
18,085

— $326.00 9/28/2021
— $371.47 9/28/2022
— $425.11 10/2/2023
$507.79 9/24/2024
$744.62 10/7/2025
$744.85 9/24/2026
$587.13 9/27/2027

1,975
5,500
5,805
7,390

20,670

— $371.47 9/28/2022
— $425.11 10/2/2023
$507.79 9/24/2024
$744.62 10/7/2025
$744.85 9/24/2026
$587.13 9/27/2027

1,975
5,500
5,805
7,390
20,670

6
4
6
5
21

4,623
$
3,082
$
4,623
$
$
3,853
$ 16,181

(1) Unless indicated otherwise, stock options vest annually in one-fourth increments over a four-year period.

Both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options have been awarded.

(2) Represents shares acquired pursuant to unvested shares granted under the Executive Stock Purchase Plan.
Such shares vest on the first anniversary of the date the option was exercised under the plan, and will vest
immediately upon a participant’s termination of employment without cause or the participant’s death or
disability.

(3) Based on the closing price of AutoZone common stock on August 25, 2018 ($770.52 per share).

(4) Represents a one-time grant of non-qualified stock options pursuant to the 2011 Equity Plan. Fifty percent

(50%) of the shares vest on the fourth anniversary of the grant, and the other fifty percent (50%) vest on the
fifth anniversary of the grant.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table sets forth information regarding stock option exercises and vested stock awards for the

Company’s Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended August 25, 2018:

Name

William C. Rhodes III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
William T. Giles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
William W. Graves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mark A. Finestone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thomas B. Newbern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Number
of shares
acquired
on exercise
(#)

28,100
24,200
11,900
13,500
—

Value
realized
on exercise
($)(1)

15,577,515
13,846,687
6,132,919
6,555,938
—

Number
of shares
acquired
on vesting
(#)(2)

121
39
23
26
—

Value
realized
on vesting
($)(3)

82,382
25,509
15,923
17,399
—

P
r
o
x
y

(1) If the shares were sold immediately upon exercise, the value realized on exercise of the option is the

difference between the actual sales price and the exercise price of the option. Otherwise, the value realized is
the difference between the closing price of AutoZone common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
the date of exercise and the exercise price of the option.

(2) Represents shares acquired pursuant to the Executive Stock Purchase Plan. See “Compensation Discussion

and Analysis” on page 20 for more information about this plan.

(3) Based on the closing price of AutoZone common stock on the vesting date.

The following table sets forth information regarding pension benefits for the Company’s Named Executive

Officers as of August 25, 2018:

PENSION BENEFITS

Name

William C. Rhodes III

Plan Name

. . . . . . . . . . . AutoZone, Inc. Associates
Pension Plan
AutoZone, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan

William T. Giles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A

William W. Graves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AutoZone, Inc. Associates

Pension Plan
AutoZone, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan

Mark A. Finestone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A

Thomas B. Newbern . . . . . . . . . . . . . AutoZone, Inc. Associates

Pension Plan
AutoZone, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan

Number of
Years of
Credited
Service

Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)(1)

Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)(2)

112,381

67,712

148,531

22,748

285,808

62,931

—

(1) The accumulated benefit is zero, as during fiscal 2018, the Company terminated the AutoZone, Inc.
Associates Pension Plan. The defined benefit portion of the AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan was also terminated. See Note L, Pension and Savings Plans, to our consolidated
financial statements in our 2018 Annual Report for a discussion of the costs associated with the termination
of the AutoZone, Inc. Associates Pension Plan.

(2) The values in this column represent the lump sum payments made to the listed executives during fiscal 2018
in connection with the termination of the AutoZone, Inc. Associates Pension Plan and the defined benefit
portion of the AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

P
r
o
x
y

Prior to January 1, 2003, substantially all full-time AutoZone employees were covered by a defined benefit

pension plan, the AutoZone, Inc. Associates Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”). The Pension Plan was a
traditional defined benefit pension plan which covered full-time AutoZone employees who were at least 21
years old and had completed one year of service with the Company. The benefits under the Pension Plan were
based on years of service and the employee’s highest consecutive five-year average compensation.

AutoZone also maintained a supplemental defined benefit pension plan for certain highly compensated

employees to supplement the benefits under the Pension Plan as part of our Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan (the “Supplemental Pension Plan”). The purpose of the Supplemental Pension Plan was to provide any
benefit that could not be provided under the qualified plan due to IRS limitations on the amount of salary that
could be recognized in the qualified plan. The benefit under the Supplemental Pension Plan was (a) the amount
of benefit determined under the Pension Plan formula but using the participant’s total compensation without
regard to any IRS limitations on salary that can be recognized under the qualified plan, less (b) the amount of
benefit determined under the Pension Plan formula reflecting the IRS limitations on compensation that can be
reflected under a qualified plan.

In December 2002, both the Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan were frozen. Accordingly, all
benefits to all participants in the Pension Plan were fixed and could not increase, and no new participants could
join the plans.

During fiscal 2018, the Company terminated both the AutoZone, Inc. Associates Pension Plan and the
Supplemental Pension Plan. Messrs. Rhodes, Graves and Newbern were participants in the Pension Plan and the
Supplemental Pension Plan, and each received lump sum payments equal to the present value of their frozen
benefits calculated by our independent actuaries.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information regarding nonqualified deferred compensation for the

Company’s Named Executive Officers as of and for the year ended August 25, 2018.

Name

Plan

William C. Rhodes III . . . Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan

William T. Giles . . . . . . . Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan

William W. Graves . . . . . Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan

Mark A. Finestone . . . . . . Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan

Thomas B. Newbern . . . . Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan

Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)

Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(2)

Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)(3)

Aggregate
withdrawals /
distributions
($)

Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)

455,625

69,950

2,092,414

— 14,624,688

132,919

29,540

166,252 (278,838) 1,174,048

162,336

22,437

93,931

— 1,843,708

115,509

22,437

180,143

— 1,335,569

168,342

22,437

3,282

(75,416) 1,434,268

(1) Represents contributions by the Named Executive Officers under the AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan (the “EDCP”). Such contributions are included under the appropriate “Salary” and
“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns for the Named Executive Officers in the Summary
Compensation Table.

(2) Represents matching contributions by the Company under the EDCP. Such contributions are included under
the “All Other Compensation” column for the Named Executive Officers in the Summary Compensation
Table.

(3) Represents the difference between the aggregate balance at end of fiscal 2018 and the end of fiscal 2017,

excluding (i) contributions made by the executive officer and the Company during fiscal 2018 and (ii) any
withdrawals or distributions during fiscal 2018. None of the earnings in this column were included in the
Summary Compensation Table because they were not preferential or above market.

Officers of the Company with the title of vice president or higher based in the United States are eligible to

participate in the EDCP after their first year of employment with the Company. As of August 25, 2018, there
were 49 such officers of the Company. The EDCP is a nonqualified plan that allows officers to make a pretax
deferral of base salary and bonus compensation. Officers may defer up to 25% of base salary and up to 75% of
bonus compensation. The Company match is calculated based on 100% of the first 3% of deferred compensation
and 50% of the next 2% deferred, less the maximum value of the Company match available generally to
participants in AutoZone’s 401(k) Plan. Participants may select among various mutual funds in which to invest
their deferral accounts. Participants may elect to receive distribution of their deferral accounts at retirement or
starting in a specific future year of choice before or after anticipated retirement (but not later than the year in
which the participant reaches age 75). If a participant’s employment with AutoZone terminates other than by
retirement or death, the account balance will be paid in a lump sum payment six months after termination of
employment. There are provisions in the EDCP for withdrawal of all or part of the deferral account balance in
the event of an extreme and unforeseen financial hardship.

P
r
o
x
y

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Our Named Executive Officers may receive certain benefits if their employment terminates under specified

circumstances. These benefits derive from Company policies, plans, agreements and arrangements described
below.

Agreement with Mr. Rhodes

In 2008, Mr. Rhodes and AutoZone entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) providing that if
Mr. Rhodes’ employment is terminated by the Company without cause, he will receive severance benefits
consisting of an amount equal to 2.99 times his then-current base salary, a lump sum prorated share of any
unpaid annual bonus incentive for periods during which he was employed, and AutoZone will pay the cost of
COBRA premiums to continue his medical, dental and vision insurance benefits for up to 18 months to the
extent such premiums exceed the amount Mr. Rhodes had been paying for such coverage during his
employment. The Agreement further provides that Mr. Rhodes will not compete with AutoZone or solicit its
employees for a three-year period after his employment with AutoZone terminates.

Executive Officer Agreements (Messrs. Giles, Graves, Finestone and Newbern)

AutoZone’s executive officers who do not have written employment agreements, including Messrs. Giles,

Finestone, Graves and Newbern, have entered into agreements (“Severance and Non-Compete Agreements”)
with the Company providing that if their employment is involuntarily terminated without cause, and if they sign
an agreement waiving certain legal rights, they will receive severance benefits in the form of salary continuation
for a period of time ranging from 12 months to 24 months, depending on their length of service at the time of
termination. Mr. Giles presently has 12 years of service, Mr. Graves has 25 years of service, Mr. Finestone has
16 years of service and Mr. Newbern has 33 years of service.

Years of Service

Severance
Period

Less than 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12 months

2 – less than 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

18 months

5 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24 months

The executives will also receive a lump sum prorated share of their annual bonus incentive when such
incentives are paid to similarly-situated executives. Medical, dental and vision insurance benefits generally
continue through the severance period up to a maximum of 18 months, with the Company paying the cost of
COBRA premiums to the extent such premiums exceed the amount the executive had been paying for such
coverage. An appropriate level of outplacement services may be provided based on individual circumstances.

The Severance and Non-Compete Agreement further provides that the executive will not compete with
AutoZone or solicit its employees for a two-year period after his or her employment with AutoZone terminates.

Equity Plans

All outstanding, unvested stock options, including those held by the Named Executive Officers, will vest

immediately upon the option holder’s death pursuant to the terms of the stock option agreements.

Unvested shares under our Executive Stock Purchase Plan, which normally are subject to forfeiture if a

participant’s employment terminates prior to the first anniversary of their acquisition, will vest immediately if
the termination is by reason of the participant’s death, disability, termination by the Company without cause, or
retirement on or after the participant’s normal retirement date. The plan defines “disability,” “cause,” and
“normal retirement date.”

Life Insurance

AutoZone provides all salaried employees in active full-time employment in the United States a company-

paid life insurance benefit in the amount of two times annual earnings. “Annual earnings” exclude stock

compensation and gains realized from stock option exercises, but include salary and incentive compensation
received. Additionally, salaried employees are eligible to purchase additional life insurance subject to
insurability above certain amounts. The maximum benefit of the company-paid and the additional coverage
combined is $5,000,000. All of the Named Executive Officers are eligible for this benefit.

Disability Insurance

All full-time officers at the level of vice president and above are eligible to participate in two executive
long-term disability plans. Accordingly, AutoZone purchases individual disability policies for its executive
officers that pay 70% of the first $7,143 of insurable monthly earnings in the event of disability. Additionally,
the executive officers are eligible to receive an executive long-term disability plan benefit in the amount of 70%
of the next $35,714 of insurable monthly earnings to a maximum benefit of $25,000 per month. AutoZone
purchases insurance to cover this plan benefit. These two benefits combined provide a maximum benefit of
$30,000 per month. The benefit payment for these plans may be reduced by deductible sources of income and
disability earnings.

P
r
o
x
y

The following table shows the amounts that the Named Executive Officers would have received if their
employment had been terminated under specified circumstances on August 25, 2018. This table does not include
amounts related to the Named Executive Officers’ vested benefits under our deferred compensation and pension
plans or pursuant to stock option awards, all of which are described in the tables above.

P
r
o
x
y

Name

William C. Rhodes, III(1)

Severance Pay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annual Incentive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits Continuation . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unvested Stock Options . . . . . . . . . . .
Unvested Stock Awards . . . . . . . . . . .
Disability Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Life Insurance Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

William T. Giles(2)

William W. Graves(2)

Mark A. Finestone(2)

Thomas B. Newbern(2)

Severance Pay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annual Incentive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits Continuation . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unvested Stock Options . . . . . . . . . . .
Disability Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Life Insurance Benefits . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Voluntary or
For Cause
Termination
($)

Involuntary
Termination
Not For Cause
($)

Change in
Control
($)

Disability
($)

Death
($)

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—

2,990,000
1,250,000
24,588
—
101,709
—
—
4,366,297

1,290,000
481,443
26,944
—
31,592
—
—
1,829,979

1,063,000
396,722
23,552
—
16,181
—
—
1,499,455

1,063,000
396,722
26,944
—
—
—
1,486,666

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
1,250,000
1,250,000
—
3,181
— 5,301,206
101,709
—
— 5,000,000
11,656,096

101,709
4,441,366

5,793,075

—
—
481,443
481,443
—
2,945
— 2,606,414
31,592
—
— 2,154,000
5,276,394

31,592
2,191,497

2,704,532

—
—
396,722
396,722
—
2,945
— 2,139,708
16,181
—
— 1,000,000
3,555,556

16,181
2,461,308

2,874,211

—
—
396,722
396,722
—
2,945
— 2,165,608
16,181
—
— 1,898,000
4,479,456

16,181
2,641,308

3,054,211

—
—
396,722
396,722
—
2,945
— 2,165,608
—
— 1,000,000
3,565,275

3,608,219

3,211,497

Normal
Retirement
($)

—
1,250,000
—
—
—
—
—
1,250,000

—
481,443
—
—
—
—
—
481,443

—
396,722
—
—
—
—
—
396,722

—
396,722
—
—
—
—
396,722

(1) Severance Pay, Annual Incentive and Benefits Continuation amounts shown under the “Involuntary

Termination Not for Cause” column reflect the terms of Mr. Rhodes’ Agreement described above. Unvested

P
r
o
x
y

stock options are those outstanding, unvested stock options which will vest immediately upon the option
holder’s death. Unvested stock awards are shares under the Executive Stock Purchase Plan, which vest upon
involuntary termination not for cause, disability, or death. Annual Incentive is shown at actual annual
incentive amount for the 2018 fiscal year; it would be prorated if the triggering event occurred other than on
the last day of the fiscal year. Disability Benefits are benefits under a Company-paid individual long-term
disability insurance policy. Life Insurance Benefits are benefits under a Company-paid life insurance policy.

(2) Severance Pay, Annual Incentive and Benefits Continuation amounts shown under the “Involuntary

Termination Not for Cause” column reflect payments to Mr. Giles, Mr. Graves, Mr. Finestone and
Mr. Newbern under the Severance and Non-Compete Agreements described above. Annual Incentive is
shown at actual annual incentive amount for the 2018 fiscal year; it would be prorated if the triggering event
occurred other than on the last day of the fiscal year. Benefits Continuation refers to medical, dental and
vision benefits. Unvested stock options are those outstanding, unvested stock options which will vest
immediately upon the option holder’s death. Unvested stock awards are share options under the Executive
Stock Purchase Plan, which vest upon involuntary termination not for cause, disability, or death. Disability
Benefits are benefits under Company-paid individual long-term disability insurance policy. Life Insurance
Benefits are benefits under a Company-paid life insurance policy.

Ratio of the Annual Total Compensation of the Median-Paid Employee to the CEO

Pursuant to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we have conducted an analysis of our global employee

population in order to estimate and disclose the total compensation paid to our median paid employee, not
including our CEO, as well as the ratio of the total compensation paid to said median employee as compared to
the total compensation paid to our CEO. The analysis, which is briefly described below, yielded the following
results:

Total compensation for the median employee for fiscal 2018 (not including the CEO): . .
Total compensation for the CEO (see page 32):
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resulting CEO-to-median employee pay ratio: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

23,546
$
$4,220,619
179:1

Measurement date. We identified the median employee from our population as of June 30, 2018.

Compensation measure. The regulations require us to use a “consistently applied compensation measure”,

or CACM, to identify the median employee. Based on an analysis of the AutoZone workforce, we determined
that fixed or guaranteed compensation, including overtime and earnings for paid time off, plus variable
compensation (e.g., bonus or commission pay) closely approximate the annual total direct compensation of our
employees. We converted the earnings paid in local (non-U.S.) currency to U.S. dollars using published
exchange rates as of June 30, 2018. We did not apply pay adjustments allowed by the rules in order to ensure a
conservative estimate (i.e., it is unlikely that the estimate could have been higher than that calculated).

Excluded population. We excluded from the analysis AutoZone employees in Brazil, Canada, China,
Germany and the United Kingdom, pursuant to the de minimus exemption under the rules. The 370 employees in
these locations represent less than 5% of the total employee population of 87,600 as of June 30, 2018.

Related Party Transactions

Our Board has adopted a Related Person Transaction Policy (the “Policy”) which requires the Audit
Committee of the Board to review and approve or ratify all Related Person Transactions. The Audit Committee
is to consider all of the available relevant facts and circumstances of each transaction, including but not limited
to the benefits to the Company; the impact on a director’s independence in the event the Related Person is a
director, an immediate family member of a director or an entity in which a director is a partner, shareholder or
executive officer; the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; the terms of the
transaction; and the terms available to unrelated third parties generally. Related Person Transactions must also
comply with the policies and procedures specified in our Code of Conduct and Corporate Governance
Principles, as described below.

The Policy also requires disclosure of all Related Person Transactions that are required to be disclosed in
AutoZone’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in accordance with all applicable legal and
regulatory requirements.

P
r
o
x
y

A “Related Person Transaction” is defined in the Policy as a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or

any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) that occurred since the beginning of the
Company’s most recent fiscal year in which the Company (including any of its subsidiaries) was, is or will be a
participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any Related Person had, has or will have a
direct or indirect material interest. “Related Persons” include a director or executive officer of the Company, a
nominee to become a director of the Company, any person known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of
any class of the Company’s voting securities, any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons,
and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a partner or
principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest.

Our Board has adopted a Code of Conduct (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to the Company’s

directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct prohibits directors and executive officers from engaging
in activities that create conflicts of interest, taking corporate opportunities for personal use or competing with
the Company, among other things. Our Board has also adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial
Executives (the “Financial Code of Conduct”) that applies to the Company’s officers and employees who hold
the position of principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller
as well as to the Company’s officers and employees who perform similar functions (“Financial Executives”).
The Financial Code of Conduct requires the Financial Executives to, among other things, report any actual or
apparent conflicts of interest between personal or professional relationships involving the Company’s
management or any other Company employee with a role in financial reporting disclosures or internal controls.
Additionally, our Corporate Governance Principles require each director who is faced with an issue that
presents, or may give the appearance of presenting, a conflict of interest to disclose that fact to the Chairman of
the Board and the Secretary, and to refrain from participating in discussions or votes on such issue unless a
majority of the Board determines, after consultation with counsel, that no conflict of interest exists as to such
matter.

We have concluded there are no material Related Party Transactions or agreements that were entered into
during the fiscal year ended August 25, 2018, and through the date of this proxy statement requiring disclosure
under these policies.

Equity Compensation Plans

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders

Our stockholders have approved the Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Award
Plan, the AutoZone, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan, the 2006 Stock Option Plan, the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the Executive Stock Purchase Plan, the 2003 Director Compensation Plan and the 2003 Director
Stock Option Plan.

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders

The AutoZone, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan was approved by the
Board, but was not submitted for approval by the stockholders as then permitted under the rules of the New
York Stock Exchange. This plan was terminated in December 2002 and was replaced by the 2003 Director
Compensation Plan, after the stockholders approved it. No further grants can be made under the terminated plan.
However, any grants made under this plan will continue under the terms of the grant made. Only treasury shares
are issued under the terminated plan.

Under the Second Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan, a non-employee director could
receive no more than one-half of the annual retainer and meeting fees immediately in cash, and the remainder of
the fees were taken in common stock or deferred in stock appreciation rights.

The following table sets forth certain information as of August 25, 2018, with respect to compensation

plans under which shares of AutoZone common stock may be issued.

Summary Table

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
warrants and rights

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in the
first column)

P
r
o
x
y

Plan Category

Equity compensation plans

approved by security holders . .

1,600,981

Equity compensation plans not

approved by security holders . .

7,284

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,608,265

$561.46

38.18

$559.09

1,088,401

—

1,088,401

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Securities laws require our executive officers, directors, and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of

our common stock to file insider trading reports (Forms 3, 4, and 5) with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the New York Stock Exchange relating to the number of shares of common stock that they
own, and any changes in their ownership. To our knowledge, all persons related to AutoZone that are required to
file these insider trading reports have filed them in a timely manner. Copies of the insider trading reports can be
found on the AutoZone corporate website at www.autozoneinc.com.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

Stockholder proposals for inclusion in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting in 2019 must be
received by June 28, 2019. In accordance with our By-Laws, stockholder proposals received after August 21,
2019, but by September 20, 2019, may be presented at the Annual Meeting, but will not be included in the Proxy
Statement. Any stockholder proposal received after September 20, 2019, will not be eligible to be presented for
a vote to the stockholders in accordance with our By-Laws. Any proposals must be mailed to AutoZone, Inc.,
Attention: Secretary, Post Office Box 2198, Dept. 8074, Memphis, Tennessee 38101-2198.

A copy of our Annual Report is being mailed with this Proxy Statement to all stockholders of record.

ANNUAL REPORT

Memphis, Tennessee
October 26, 2018

By order of the Board of Directors,

Kristen C. Wright
Secretary

P
r
o
x
y

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Form 10-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________

FORM 10-K

(cid:55)

Annual Report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 25, 2018, or

(cid:133)

Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______.

Commission file number 1-10714

1
0
-
K

AUTOZONE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

62-1482048
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

123 South Front Street, Memphis, Tennessee
(Address of principal executive offices)

38103
(Zip Code)

(901) 495-6500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Common Stock
($.01 par value)

Name of each exchange
on which registered
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes (cid:55) No (cid:133)

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of
the Act. Yes (cid:133) No (cid:55)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes (cid:55) No (cid:133)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes (cid:55) No (cid:133)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of
this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. (cid:55)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.

Large accelerated filer (cid:55)
Non-accelerated filer (cid:133)(cid:3)(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)(cid:3)
Emerging growth company (cid:133)

Accelerated filer (cid:133)
Smaller reporting company (cid:133)

1
0
-
K

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended
transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to
Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.(cid:3)(cid:133)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes (cid:133)
No (cid:55)

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by
reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such
common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was
$19,597,989,296.

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 22, 2018, was 25,559,353.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days of August 25, 2018, pursuant to Regulation
14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held December 19,
2018, are incorporated by reference into Part III.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Business .................................................................................................................................................................
Item 1.
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................
Marketing and Merchandising Strategy .............................................................................................................
Commercial ........................................................................................................................................................
Store Operations .................................................................................................................................................
Store Development .............................................................................................................................................
Purchasing and Supply Chain .............................................................................................................................
Competition ........................................................................................................................................................
Trademarks and Patents ......................................................................................................................................
Employees ..........................................................................................................................................................
AutoZone Websites ............................................................................................................................................
Executive Officers of the Registrant ..................................................................................................................
Item 1A. Risk Factors ...........................................................................................................................................................
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments ..................................................................................................................................
Properties ...............................................................................................................................................................
Item 2.
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings ..................................................................................................................................................
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures ........................................................................................................................................

PART II ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities ................................................................................................................................................................
Selected Financial Data ..........................................................................................................................................
Item 6.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations .................................
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ...............................................................................
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ......................................................................................................
Item 8.
Item 9.
Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.................................
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures .........................................................................................................................................
Item 9B. Other Information ...................................................................................................................................................

PART III ....................................................................................................................................................................................
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance .....................................................................................
Item 11. Executive Compensation .......................................................................................................................................
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters ..............
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence .......................................................
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services ................................................................................................................

PART IV.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ..........................................................................................................
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary .............................................................................................................................................

5
5
5
6
8
8
9
9
10
10
10
10
11
13
19
19
19
20

21
23
24
38
40
75
75
75

76
76
76
76
76
76

77
77
82

1
0
-
K

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this annual report constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to the
safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements
typically use words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “should,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “expect,” “estimate,”
“project,” “positioned,” “strategy,” “seek,” “may,” “could” and similar expressions. These are based on
assumptions and assessments made by our management in light of experience and perception of historical trends,
current conditions, expected future developments and other factors that we believe to be appropriate. These
forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation:
product demand; energy prices; weather; competition; credit market conditions; access to available and feasible
financing; the impact of recessionary conditions; consumer debt levels; changes in laws or regulations; war and
the prospect of war, including terrorist activity; inflation; the ability to hire and retain qualified employees;
construction delays; the compromising of confidentiality, availability or integrity of information, including cyber
attacks; and raw material costs of suppliers. Certain of these risks are discussed in more detail in the “Risk
Factors” section contained in Item 1A under Part 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
August 25, 2018, and these Risk Factors should be read carefully. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ from those
contemplated by such forward-looking statements, and events described above and in the “Risk Factors” could
materially and adversely affect our business. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. Except
as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Actual results may materially differ from
anticipated results.

1
0
-
K

Item 1. Business

Introduction

PART I

AutoZone, Inc. (“AutoZone,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is the nation’s leading retailer, and a leading
distributor, of automotive replacement parts and accessories in the United States. We began operations in 1979
and at August 25, 2018, operated 5,618 stores in the United States, including Puerto Rico; 564 stores in Mexico;
and 20 stores in Brazil. Each store carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light
trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-
automotive products. At August 25, 2018, in 4,741 of our domestic stores, we also had a commercial sales
program that provides commercial credit and prompt delivery of parts and other products to local, regional and
national repair garages, dealers, service stations and public sector accounts. We also have commercial programs in
stores in Mexico and Brazil. We also sell the ALLDATA brand automotive diagnostic and repair software through
www.alldata.com and www.alldatadiy.com. Additionally, we sell automotive hard parts, maintenance items,
accessories and non-automotive products through www.autozone.com, and our commercial customers can make
purchases through www.autozonepro.com. We do not derive revenue from automotive repair or installation
services.

At August 25, 2018, our stores were in the following locations:

Alabama ..........................................................................................................................................
Alaska ..............................................................................................................................................
Arizona ............................................................................................................................................
Arkansas ..........................................................................................................................................
California ........................................................................................................................................
Colorado ..........................................................................................................................................
Connecticut .....................................................................................................................................
Delaware .........................................................................................................................................
Florida .............................................................................................................................................
Georgia ............................................................................................................................................
Hawaii .............................................................................................................................................
Idaho................................................................................................................................................
Illinois .............................................................................................................................................
Indiana .............................................................................................................................................
Iowa .................................................................................................................................................
Kansas .............................................................................................................................................
Kentucky .........................................................................................................................................
Louisiana .........................................................................................................................................
Maine ..............................................................................................................................................
Maryland .........................................................................................................................................
Massachusetts ..................................................................................................................................
Michigan .........................................................................................................................................
Minnesota ........................................................................................................................................
Mississippi ......................................................................................................................................
Missouri ..........................................................................................................................................
Montana ..........................................................................................................................................
Nebraska ..........................................................................................................................................
Nevada ............................................................................................................................................
New Hampshire ...............................................................................................................................
New Jersey ......................................................................................................................................
New Mexico ....................................................................................................................................
New York ........................................................................................................................................
North Carolina .................................................................................................................................

Store
Count

113
8
142
66
602
90
49
16
334
201
8
29
238
156
32
53
97
124
13
78
82
194
54
95
113
13
21
65
23
102
62
198
221

1
0
-
K

North Dakota ...................................................................................................................................
Ohio .................................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma ........................................................................................................................................
Oregon .............................................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ...................................................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ......................................................................................................................................
Rhode Island....................................................................................................................................
South Carolina .................................................................................................................................
South Dakota ...................................................................................................................................
Tennessee ........................................................................................................................................
Texas ...............................................................................................................................................
Utah .................................................................................................................................................
Vermont ..........................................................................................................................................
Virginia ...........................................................................................................................................
Washington .....................................................................................................................................
Washington, DC ..............................................................................................................................
West Virginia ..................................................................................................................................
Wisconsin ........................................................................................................................................
Wyoming .........................................................................................................................................
Total Domestic stores ......................................................................................................................
Mexico ............................................................................................................................................
Brazil ...............................................................................................................................................
Total stores ......................................................................................................................................

5
266
74
47
189
45
17
88
8
166
610
59
2
131
92
5
44
69
9
5,618
564
20
6,202

Marketing and Merchandising Strategy

We are dedicated to providing customers with superior service and trustworthy advice as well as quality
automotive parts and products at a great value in conveniently located, well-designed stores. Key elements of this
strategy are:

Customer Service
Customer service is the most important element in our marketing and merchandising strategy, which is based
upon consumer marketing research. We emphasize that our AutoZoners (employees) should always put customers
first by providing prompt, courteous service and trustworthy advice. Our electronic parts catalog assists in the
selection of parts as well as identifying any associated warranties that are offered by us or our vendors. We sell
automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive parts through www.autozone.com for
pick-up in store or to be shipped directly to a customer’s home or business. Additionally, we offer a smartphone
app that provides customers with store locations, driving directions, operating hours, ability to purchase products
and product availability.

Our stores generally open at 7:30 or 8 a.m. and close between 8 and 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday and
typically open at 9 a.m. and close between 6 and 9 p.m. on Sunday. However, some stores are open 24 hours, and
some have extended hours of 6 or 7 a.m. until midnight seven days a week.

We also provide specialty tools through our Loan-A-Tool program. Customers can borrow a specialty tool, such
as a steering wheel puller, for which a do-it-yourself (“DIY”) customer or a repair shop would have little or no use
other than for a single job. AutoZoners also provide other free services, including check engine light readings
where allowed by law, battery charging, the collection of used oil for recycling, and the testing of starters,
alternators and batteries.

Merchandising
The following tables show some of the types of products that we sell by major category of items:

Maintenance

Antifreeze & Windshield Washer Fluid
Brake Drums, Rotors, Shoes & Pads
Chemicals, including Brake & Power
Steering Fluid, Oil & Fuel Additives
Oil & Transmission Fluid
Oil, Air, Fuel & Transmission Filters
Oxygen Sensors
Paint & Accessories
Refrigerant & Accessories
Shock Absorbers & Struts
Spark Plugs & Wires
Windshield Wipers

Discretionary

Air Fresheners
Cell Phone Accessories
Drinks & Snacks
Floor Mats & Seat Covers
Interior & Exterior Accessories
Mirrors
Performance Products
Protectants & Cleaners
Sealants & Adhesives
Steering Wheel Covers
Stereos & Radios
Tools
Wash & Wax

Failure
A/C Compressors
Batteries & Accessories
Bearings
Belts & Hoses
Calipers
Carburetors
Chassis
Clutches
CV Axles
Engines
Fuel Pumps
Fuses
Ignition
Lighting
Mufflers
Radiators
Starters & Alternators
Thermostats
Tire Repair
Water Pumps

We believe that the satisfaction of our customers is often impacted by our ability to provide specific automotive
products as requested. Each store carries the same basic products, but we tailor our hard parts inventory to the
makes and models of the vehicles in each store’s trade area, and our sales floor products are tailored to the local
store’s demographics. Our hub stores (including mega hubs, which carry an even broader assortment) carry a
larger assortment of products that are delivered to local satellite stores. We are constantly updating the products
we offer to ensure that our inventory matches the products our customers need or desire.

Pricing
We want to be the value leader in our industry, by consistently providing quality merchandise at the right price,
backed by a satisfactory warranty and outstanding customer service. For many of our products, we offer multiple
value choices in a good/better/best assortment, with appropriate price and quality differences from the “good”
products to the “better” and “best” products. A key differentiating component versus our competitors is our
exclusive line of in-house brands, which includes the AutoZone, Duralast, Duralast Max, Duralast Gold, Duralast
Platinum, Duralast ProPower, Duralast GT, Valucraft, SureBilt and ProElite. We believe that our overall value
compares favorably to that of our competitors.

Brand Marketing: Advertising and Promotions
We believe that targeted advertising and promotions play important roles in succeeding in today’s environment.
We are constantly working to understand our customers’ wants and needs so that we can build long-lasting, loyal
relationships. We utilize promotions, advertising and loyalty programs primarily to highlight our great value and
the availability of high quality parts. Broadcast and internet media are our primary advertising methods of driving
retail traffic to our stores, while we leverage a dedicated sales force and our ProVantage loyalty program to drive
commercial sales. In the stores, we utilize in-store signage, in-store circulars, and creative product placement and
promotions to help educate customers about products that they need.

Store Design and Visual Merchandising
We design and build stores for high visual impact. The typical store utilizes colorful exterior and interior signage,
exposed beams and ductwork and brightly lit interiors. Maintenance products, accessories and non-automotive
items are attractively displayed for easy browsing by customers. In-store signage and special displays promote
products on floor displays, end caps and shelves.

1
0
-
K

Commercial

Our commercial sales program operates in a highly fragmented market, and we are one of the leading distributors
of automotive parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service stations and
public sector accounts in the United States, Puerto Rico, Mexico and Brazil. As a part of the domestic store
program, we offer credit and delivery to our customers, as well as online ordering through
www.autozonepro.com. Through our hub stores, we offer a greater range of parts and products desired by
professional technicians. We have dedicated sales teams focused on independent repair shops as well as national,
regional and public sector commercial accounts.

Store Operations

Store Formats
Substantially all stores are based on standard store formats, resulting in generally consistent appearance,
merchandising and product mix. Approximately 85% to 90% of each store’s square footage is selling space. In our
satellite stores, approximately 40% to 45% of our space is dedicated to hard parts inventory, while our hub stores
and mega hubs have 75% to 85% of their space utilized for hard parts. The hard parts inventory area is generally
fronted by counters or pods that run the depth or length of the store, dividing the hard parts area from the
remainder of the store. The remaining selling space contains displays of maintenance, accessories and non-
automotive items.

We believe that our stores are “destination stores,” generating their own traffic rather than relying on traffic
created by adjacent stores. Therefore, we situate most stores on major thoroughfares with easy access and good
parking.

Store Personnel and Training
We provide on-the-job training as well as formal training programs, including an annual national sales meeting
with related cascading meetings at our distribution centers, regional offices and stores; store meetings on specific
sales and product topics; standardized computer-based training to support culture, safety, salesmanship,
compliance and product and job knowledge; and several specialist, vendor and third-party programs to support
learning and development in areas requiring technical expertise and specific job knowledge. All domestic
AutoZoners are encouraged to complete our in-house product knowledge program and Parts Expert certification,
which is developed in partnership with our key suppliers. Training is supplemented with frequent store visits by
management. Advanced leadership training is an additional area of investment that is used to deepen bench
strength and support succession planning.

Store managers, sales representatives, commercial sales managers, and managers at various levels across the
organization receive financial incentives through performance-based bonuses. In addition, our growth has
provided opportunities for the promotion of qualified AutoZoners. We believe these opportunities are important to
attract, motivate and retain high quality AutoZoners.

All store support functions are centralized in our store support centers located in Memphis, Tennessee; Monterrey,
Mexico; Chihuahua, Mexico and Sao Paulo, Brazil. We believe that this centralization enhances consistent
execution of our merchandising and marketing strategies at the store level, while reducing expenses and cost of
sales.

Store Automation
All of our stores have Z-net, our proprietary electronic catalog that enables our AutoZoners to efficiently look up
the parts that our customers need and to provide complete job solutions, advice and information for customer
vehicles. Z-net provides parts information based on the year, make, model and engine type of a vehicle and also
tracks inventory availability at the store, at other nearby stores and through special order. The Z-net display
screens are placed on the hard parts counter or pods, where both the AutoZoner and customer can view the screen.

Our stores utilize our computerized proprietary Store Management System, which includes bar code scanning and
point-of-sale data collection terminals. The Store Management System provides administrative assistance and
improved personnel scheduling at the store level, as well as enhanced merchandising information and improved

inventory control. We believe the Store Management System also enhances customer service through faster
processing of transactions and simplified warranty and product return procedures.

Store Development

The following table reflects our location development during the past five fiscal years:

Locations:
Beginning ...........................................
Acquired(1) ..........................................
Sold(2) .................................................
New ....................................................
Closed.................................................
Net new ..............................................
Relocated ............................................
Ending ................................................

2018

2017

Fiscal Year
2016

2015

2014

6,029
–
26
201
2
199
7
6,202

5,814
–
–
215
–
215
5
6,029

5,609
–
–
205
–
205
6
5,814

5,391
17
–
202
1
201
5
5,609

5,201
–
–
190
–
190
8
5,391

(1) 17 Interamerican Motor Corporation (“IMC”) branches acquired on September 27, 2014.
(2) 26 IMC branches sold on April 4, 2018. See “Note M – Sale of Assets” for more information.

We believe that expansion opportunities exist in markets that we do not currently serve, as well as in markets
where we can achieve a larger presence. We undertake substantial research prior to entering new markets. The
most important criteria for opening a new store is the projected future profitability and the ability to achieve our
required investment hurdle rate. Key factors in selecting new site and market locations for stores include
population, demographics, vehicle profile, customer buying trends, commercial businesses, number and strength
of competitors’ stores and the cost of real estate. In reviewing the vehicle profile, we also consider the number of
vehicles that are seven years old and older, or “our kind of vehicles”; these vehicles are generally no longer under
the original manufacturers’ warranties and require more maintenance and repair than newer vehicles. We seek to
open new stores in high visibility sites in high traffic locations within or contiguous to existing market areas and
attempt to cluster development in markets in a relatively short period of time. In addition to continuing to lease or
develop our own locations, we evaluate and may make strategic acquisitions.

Purchasing and Supply Chain

Merchandise is selected and purchased for all stores through our store support centers located in Memphis,
Tennessee; Monterrey, Mexico and Sao Paulo, Brazil. Additionally, we have an office in Shanghai, China to
support our sourcing efforts in Asia. In fiscal 2018, one class of similar products accounted for approximately 12
percent of our total sales, and one vendor supplied approximately 12 percent of our purchases. No other class of
similar products accounted for 10 percent or more of our total sales, and no other individual vendor provided more
than 10 percent of our total purchases. We believe that alternative sources of supply exist, at similar costs, for
most types of product sold. Most of our merchandise flows through our distribution centers to our stores by our
fleet of tractors and trailers or by third-party trucking firms.

We ended fiscal 2018 with 194 domestic hub stores, which have a larger assortment of products as well as regular
replenishment items that can be delivered to a store in its network within 24 hours. Hub stores are generally
replenished from distribution centers multiple times per week. Hub stores have increased our ability to distribute
products on a timely basis to many of our stores and to expand our product assortment.

In recent years, we closely studied our hub distribution model, store inventory levels and product assortment,
which led to strategic tests on increased frequency of delivery to our domestic stores and significantly expanding
parts assortment in select domestic stores we call mega hubs. During fiscal 2018, we completed our testing and
implemented new frequencies resulting in approximately 25% of our stores, representing 40% of our retail sales
volume and nearly 50% of our commercial sales volume, receiving distribution center deliveries three or more
times per week.

1
0
-
K

A mega hub store carries inventory of 80,000 to 100,000 unique SKUs, approximately twice what a hub store
carries. Mega hubs provide coverage to both surrounding stores and other hub stores multiple times a day or on an
overnight basis. Currently, we have over 4,800 stores with access to mega hub inventory. A majority of these
4,800 stores currently receive their service on an overnight basis, but as we expand our mega hubs, more of them
will receive this service same day and many will receive it multiple times per day. We ended fiscal 2018 with 24
mega hubs, an increase of eight since fiscal 2017.

Competition

The sale of automotive parts, accessories and maintenance items is highly competitive in many areas, including
name recognition, product availability, customer service, store location and price. AutoZone competes in the
aftermarket auto parts industry, which includes both the retail DIY and commercial do-it-for-me (“DIFM”) auto
parts and products markets.

Competitors include national, regional and local auto parts chains, independently owned parts stores, online parts
stores, wholesale distributors, jobbers, repair shops, car washes and auto dealers, in addition to discount and mass
merchandise stores, department stores, hardware stores, supermarkets, drugstores, convenience stores, home
stores, and other online retailers that sell aftermarket vehicle parts and supplies, chemicals, accessories, tools and
maintenance parts. AutoZone competes on the basis of customer service, including the trustworthy advice of our
AutoZoners; merchandise quality, selection and availability; price; product warranty; store layouts, location and
convenience; and the strength of our AutoZone brand name, trademarks and service marks.

1
0
-
K

Trademarks and Patents

We have registered several service marks and trademarks in the United States Patent and Trademark Office as
well as in certain other countries, including our service marks, “AutoZone” and “Get in the Zone,” and
trademarks, “AutoZone,” “Duralast,” “Duralast Gold,” “Duralast Platinum,” “Duralast ProPower,” “Duralast
ProPower Plus,” “Duralast ProPower Ultra,” “Duralast ProPower AGM,” “Duralast Max,” “Valucraft,”
“ProElite,” “SureBilt,” “ALLDATA,” “Loan-A-Tool” and “Z-net.” We believe that these service marks and
trademarks are important components of our marketing and merchandising strategies.

Employees

As of August 25, 2018, we employed approximately 90,000 persons, approximately 61 percent of whom were
employed full-time. About 90 percent of our AutoZoners were employed in stores or in direct field supervision,
approximately 6 percent in distribution centers and approximately 4 percent in store support and other functions.
Included in the above numbers are approximately 9,000 persons employed in our Mexico and Brazil operations.

We have never experienced any material labor disruption and believe that relations with our AutoZoners are good.

AutoZone Websites

AutoZone’s primary website is at http://www.autozone.com. We make available, free of charge, at our investor
relations website, http://www.autozoneinc.com, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports
on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, registration statements and amendments to those
reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as soon as reasonably feasible after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Our website and the information contained therein or linked thereto are not
intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following list describes our executive officers. The title of each executive officer includes the words
“Customer Satisfaction” which reflects our commitment to customer service. Senior officers are elected by and
serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

William C. Rhodes, III, 53—Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Customer Satisfaction
William C. Rhodes, III, was named Chairman of AutoZone during fiscal 2007 and has been President, Chief
Executive Officer and a director since March 2005. Prior to his appointment as President and Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Rhodes was Executive Vice President – Store Operations and Commercial. Previously, he held
several key management positions with the Company. Prior to 1994, Mr. Rhodes was a manager with Ernst &
Young LLP. Mr. Rhodes is a member of the Board of Directors for Dollar General Corporation.

William T. Giles, 59—Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President – Finance and Information
Technology, Customer Satisfaction
William T. Giles was named Chief Financial Officer during May 2006. He has also held other responsibilities at
various times including Executive Vice President of Finance, Information Technology, ALLDATA and Store
Development. From 1991 to May 2006, he held several positions with Linens N’ Things, Inc., most recently as the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to 1991, he was with Melville, Inc. and
PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Giles is a member of the Board of Directors for Brinker International.

Mark A. Finestone, 57—Executive Vice President – Merchandising, Supply Chain and Marketing, Customer
Satisfaction
Mark A. Finestone was named Executive Vice President – Merchandising, Supply Chain and Marketing during
October 2015. Previously, he was Senior Vice President – Merchandising and Store Development since 2014,
Senior Vice President – Merchandising from 2008 to 2014, and Vice President – Merchandising from 2002 to
2008. Prior to joining AutoZone in 2002, Mr. Finestone worked for May Department Stores for 19 years where he
held a variety of leadership roles which included Divisional Vice President, Merchandising. Mr. Finestone also
serves as Chairman of the Auto Care Association.

1
0
-
K

William W. Graves, 58—Executive Vice President – Mexico, Brazil and Store Development, Customer
Satisfaction
William W. Graves was named Executive Vice President – Mexico, Brazil and Store Development during
October 2015. Previously, he was Senior Vice President – Supply Chain and International since 2012. Prior
thereto, he was Senior Vice President – Supply Chain from 2006 to 2012 and Vice President – Supply Chain from
2000 to 2006. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Graves served in various capacities within the Company. On September
27, 2018, Mr. Graves announced his retirement from the Company, which will be effective early January 2019.

Thomas B. Newbern, 56—Executive Vice President – Store Operations, Commercial, Loss Prevention and
ALLDATA, Customer Satisfaction
Thomas B. Newbern was named Executive Vice President – Store Operations, Commercial, Loss Prevention and
ALLDATA during February 2017. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President – Store Operations, Commercial
and Loss Prevention since October 2015. Previously, he held the titles Senior Vice President – Store Operations
and Loss Prevention from 2014 to 2015, Senior Vice President – Store Operations and Store Development from
2012 to 2014, Senior Vice President – Store Operations from 2007 to 2012 and Vice President – Store Operations
from 1998 to 2007. Prior thereto, he served in various capacities within the Company.

Philip B. Daniele, 49—Senior Vice President – Commercial, Customer Satisfaction
Philip B. Daniele was elected Senior Vice President – Commercial during November 2015. Prior to that, he was
Vice President – Commercial since 2013 and Vice President – Merchandising from 2008 to 2013. Previously, he
was Vice President – Store Operations from 2005 to 2008. From 1993 until 2008, Mr. Daniele served in various
capacities within the Company.

1
0
-
K

Ronald B. Griffin, 64—Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Customer Satisfaction
Ronald B. Griffin was elected Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer during June 2012. Prior to
that, he was Senior Vice President, Global Information Technology at Hewlett-Packard Company. During his
tenure at Hewlett-Packard Company, he also served as the Chief Information Officer for the Enterprise Business
Division. Prior to that, Mr. Griffin was Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Fleming
Companies, Inc. He also spent over 12 years with The Home Depot, Inc., with the last eight years in the role of
Chief Information Officer. Mr. Griffin also served at Deloitte & Touche LLP and Delta Air Lines, Inc.

William R. Hackney, 53—Senior Vice President – Merchandising, Customer Satisfaction
William R. Hackney was named Senior Vice President, Merchandising in October 2015. His career with
AutoZone began in 1983, and he has held several key management roles within the Company, including Vice
President – Store Operations Support and Vice President – Merchandising.

Rodney C. Halsell, 50—Senior Vice President – Supply Chain, Customer Satisfaction
Rodney C. Halsell was named Senior Vice President – Supply Chain during October 2015. Prior to that, he was
Vice President – Distribution since 2005. From 1985 to 2005, he held several management positions and served in
various capacities within the Company. On August 27, 2018, Mr. Halsell announced his retirement from the
Company, which will be effective November 10, 2018.

Domingo Hurtado, 57—Senior Vice President – International, Customer Satisfaction
Domingo José Hurtado Rodríguez was named Senior Vice President, International in September 2018. Prior to
that, he was President, AutoZone de México. Mr. Hurtado has served in various capacities within the Company
since 2001, which included leading the Company’s expansion into Mexico. Prior to 2001, he held different
positions with RadioShack including Director General in Mexico and General Manager in Venezuela.

Charlie Pleas, III, 53—Senior Vice President and Controller, Customer Satisfaction
Charlie Pleas, III, was elected Senior Vice President and Controller during 2007. Prior to that, he was Vice
President and Controller since 2003. Previously, he was Vice President – Accounting since 2000, and Director of
General Accounting since 1996. Prior to joining AutoZone, Mr. Pleas was a Division Controller with Fleming
Companies, Inc. where he served in various capacities since 1988. Mr. Pleas is a member of the Board of
Directors for Kirkland’s Inc.

Albert Saltiel, 54—Senior Vice President – Marketing and E-Commerce, Customer Satisfaction
Albert Saltiel was named Senior Vice President – Marketing and E-Commerce during October 2014. Previously,
he was elected Senior Vice President – Marketing since 2013. Prior to that, he was Chief Marketing Officer and a
key member of the leadership team at Navistar International Corporation. Mr. Saltiel has also been with Sony
Electronics as General Manager, Marketing, and Ford Motor Company where he held multiple marketing roles.

Richard C. Smith, 54—Senior Vice President – Human Resources, Customer Satisfaction
Richard C. Smith was elected Senior Vice President – Human Resources in December 2015. He has been an
AutoZoner since 1985, previously holding the position of Vice President of Stores since 1997. Prior thereto, he
served in various capacities within the Company.

Kristen C. Wright, 42—Senior Vice President – General Counsel & Secretary, Customer Satisfaction
Kristen C. Wright was named Senior Vice President – General Counsel & Secretary effective January 2014. She
previously held the title of Vice President – Assistant General Counsel & Assistant Secretary since January 2012.
Before joining AutoZone, she was a partner with the law firm of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business is subject to a variety of risks. The risks and uncertainties described below could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and stock price. The following information
should be read in conjunction with the other information contained in this report and other filings that we make
with the SEC. These risks are not the only ones we face. Our business could also be affected by additional factors
that are presently unknown to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial to our business.

If demand for our products slows, then our business may be materially adversely affected.

Demand for the products we sell may be affected by a number of factors we cannot control, including:

•

the number of older vehicles in service. Vehicles seven years old or older are generally no longer under
the original vehicle manufacturers’ warranties and tend to need more maintenance and repair than newer
vehicles.

rising energy prices. Increases in energy prices may cause our customers to defer purchases of certain of
our products as they use a higher percentage of their income to pay for gasoline and other energy costs
and may drive their vehicles less, resulting in less wear and tear and lower demand for repairs and
maintenance.

the economy. In periods of declining economic conditions, consumers may reduce their discretionary
spending by deferring vehicle maintenance or repair. Additionally, such conditions may affect our
customers’ ability to obtain credit. During periods of expansionary economic conditions, more of our
DIY customers may pay others to repair and maintain their vehicles instead of working on their own
vehicles, or they may purchase new vehicles.

1
0
-
K

the weather. Milder weather conditions may lower the failure rates of automotive parts, while extended
periods of rain and winter precipitation may cause our customers to defer maintenance and repair on
their vehicles. Extremely hot or cold conditions may enhance demand for our products due to increased
failure rates of our customers’ automotive parts.

technological advances. Advances in automotive technology, such as electric vehicles, and parts design
can result in cars needing maintenance less frequently and parts lasting longer.

the number of miles vehicles are driven annually. Higher vehicle mileage increases the need for
maintenance and repair. Mileage levels may be affected by gas prices and other factors.

the quality of the vehicles manufactured by the original vehicle manufacturers and the length of the
warranties or maintenance offered on new vehicles.

restrictions on access to telematics and diagnostic tools and repair information imposed by the original
vehicle manufacturers or by governmental regulation. These restrictions may cause vehicle owners to
rely on dealers to perform maintenance and repairs.

All of these factors could result in a decline in the demand for our products, which could adversely affect our
business and overall financial condition.

If we are unable to compete successfully against other businesses that sell the products that we sell, we
could lose customers and our sales and profits may decline.

The sale of automotive parts, accessories and maintenance items is highly competitive, and sales volumes are
dependent on many factors, including name recognition, product availability, customer service, store location and
price. Competitors are opening locations near our existing locations. AutoZone competes as a provider in both the
DIY and DIFM auto parts and accessories markets.

1
0
-
K

Our competitors include national, regional and local auto parts chains, independently owned parts stores, online
automotive parts stores or marketplaces, wholesale distributors, jobbers, repair shops, car washes and auto dealers,
in addition to discount and mass merchandise stores, hardware stores, supermarkets, drugstores, convenience
stores, home stores, and other retailers that sell aftermarket vehicle parts and supplies, chemicals, accessories,
tools and maintenance parts. Although we believe we compete effectively on the basis of customer service,
including the knowledge and expertise of our AutoZoners; merchandise quality, selection and availability; product
warranty; store layout, location and convenience; price; and the strength of our AutoZone brand name, trademarks
and service marks, some of our competitors may gain competitive advantages, such as greater financial and
marketing resources allowing them to sell automotive products at lower prices, larger stores with more
merchandise, longer operating histories, more frequent customer visits and more effective advertising. Online and
multi-channel retailers often focus on delivery services, offering customers faster, guaranteed delivery times and
low-price or free shipping. Some online businesses have lower operating costs than we do. In addition, because
our business strategy is based on offering superior levels of customer service to complement the products we
offer, our cost structure is higher than some of our competitors, which also puts pressure on our margins.

Consumers are embracing shopping online and through mobile commerce applications. With the increasing use of
digital tools and social media, and our competitors’ increased focus on optimizing customers’ online experience,
our customers are quickly able to compare prices, product assortment, and feedback from other customers before
purchasing our products either online, in the physical stores, or through a combination of both offerings. We
believe that we compete effectively on the basis of merchandise availability as a result of investments in inventory
available for immediate sale, the development of a robust hub and mega hub distribution network providing
efficient access to obtain products required on-demand, options to order products online or by telephone and pick
them up in stores and options for special orders directly from our vendors. We also offer hassle-free returns to our
customers. In addition, we believe that customers value the personal interaction with a salesperson that is
qualified to offer trustworthy advice and provide other free services such as parts testing.

We also utilize promotions, advertising and our loyalty programs to drive customer traffic and compete more
effectively, and we must regularly assess and adjust our efforts to address changes in the competitive marketplace.
If we are unable to continue to manage readily-available inventory demand and competitive delivery options as
well as develop successful competitive strategies, including the maintenance of effective promotions, advertising
and loyalty card programs, or if our competitors develop more effective strategies, we could lose customers and
our sales and profits may decline.

We may not be able to sustain our historic rate of sales growth.

We have increased our store count in the past five fiscal years, growing from 5,201 locations at August 31, 2013,
to 6,202 locations at August 25, 2018, an average store increase per year of 4%. Additionally, we have increased
annual revenues in the past five fiscal years from $9.148 billion in fiscal 2013 to $11.221 billion in fiscal 2018, an
average increase per year of 5%. Annual revenue growth is driven by the opening of new stores, the development
of new commercial programs and increases in same store sales. We open new stores only after evaluating
customer buying trends and market demand/needs, all of which could be adversely affected by persistent
unemployment, wage cuts, small business failures and microeconomic conditions unique to the automotive
industry. Same store sales are impacted both by customer demand levels and by the prices we are able to charge
for our products, which can also be negatively impacted by the economic pressures. We cannot provide any
assurance that we will continue to open stores at historical rates or continue to achieve increases in same store
sales.

Consolidation among our competitors may negatively impact our business.

Historically some of our competitors have merged. Consolidation among our competitors could enhance their
market share and financial position, provide them with the ability to achieve better purchasing terms and provide
more competitive prices to customers for whom we compete, and allow them to utilize merger synergies and cost
savings to increase advertising and marketing budgets to more effectively compete for customers. Consolidation
by our competitors could also increase their access to local market parts assortment.

These consolidated competitors could take sales volume away from us in certain markets, could achieve greater
market penetration, could cause us to change our pricing with a negative impact on our margins or could cause us
to spend more money to maintain customers or seek new customers, all of which could negatively impact our
business.

If we cannot profitably increase our market share in the commercial auto parts business, our sales growth
may be limited.

Although we are one of the largest sellers of auto parts in the commercial market, we must effectively compete
against national and regional auto parts chains, independently owned parts stores, wholesalers and jobbers in order
to increase our commercial market share. Although we believe we compete effectively in the commercial market
on the basis of customer service, merchandise quality, selection and availability, price, product warranty,
distribution locations, and the strength of our AutoZone brand name, trademarks and service marks, some
automotive aftermarket participants have been in business for substantially longer periods of time than we have,
and as a result have developed long-term customer relationships and have large available inventories. If we are
unable to profitably develop new commercial customers, our sales growth may be limited.

A downgrade in our credit ratings or a general disruption in the credit markets could make it more
difficult for us to access funds, refinance our debt, obtain new funding or issue securities.

Our short-term and long-term debt is rated investment grade by the major rating agencies. These investment-grade
credit ratings have historically allowed us to take advantage of lower interest rates and other favorable terms on
our short-term credit lines, in our senior debt offerings and in the commercial paper markets. To maintain our
investment-grade ratings, we are required to meet certain financial performance ratios. A change by the rating
agencies in these ratios, an increase in our debt, and/or a decline in our earnings could result in downgrades in our
credit ratings. A downgrade in our credit ratings could limit our access to public debt markets, limit the
institutions willing to provide credit facilities to us, result in more restrictive financial and other covenants in our
public and private debt and would likely significantly increase our overall borrowing costs and adversely affect
our earnings.

Moreover, significant deterioration in the financial condition of large financial institutions during the Great
Recession resulted in a severe loss of liquidity and availability of credit in global credit markets and in more
stringent borrowing terms. During brief time intervals, there was limited liquidity in the commercial paper
markets, resulting in an absence of commercial paper buyers and extraordinarily high interest rates. We can
provide no assurance that such similar events that occurred during the Great Recession will not occur again in the
foreseeable future. Conditions and events in the global credit markets could have a material adverse effect on our
access to short-term and long-term debt and the terms and cost of that debt.

Significant changes in macroeconomic and geo-political factors could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.

Macroeconomic conditions impact both our customers and our suppliers. Job growth in the United States was
stagnated and unemployment was at historically high levels during the Great Recession; however, in recent years,
the unemployment rate has improved to below pre-recession levels. Moreover, the United States government
continues to operate under historically large deficits and debt burden. Continued distress in global credit markets,
business failures, inflation, foreign exchange rate fluctuations, significant geo-political conflicts, continued
volatility in energy prices and other factors continue to affect the global economy. Moreover, rising energy prices
could impact our merchandise distribution, commercial delivery, utility and product costs. Over the short-term,
such factors could positively impact our business. Over a longer period of time, all of these macroeconomic and
geo-political conditions could adversely affect our sales growth, margins and overhead, which could adversely
affect our financial condition and operations.

Our business depends upon hiring and retaining qualified employees.

We believe that much of our brand value lies in the quality of the approximately 90,000 AutoZoners employed in
our stores, distribution centers, store support centers and ALLDATA. Our workforce costs represent our largest
operating expense, and our business is subject to employment laws and regulations, including requirements

1
0
-
K

related to minimum wage and benefits. In addition, the implementation of potential regulatory changes relating to
overtime exemptions and benefits for certain employees under federal and state laws could result in increased
labor costs to our business and negatively impact our operating results. We cannot be assured that we can continue
to hire and retain qualified employees at current wage rates since we operate in a competitive labor market and
there is a risk of market increases in compensation.

If we are unable to hire, properly train and/or retain qualified employees, we could experience higher employment
costs, reduced sales, losses of customers and diminution of our brand, which could adversely affect our earnings.
If we do not maintain competitive wages, our customer service could suffer due to a declining quality of our
workforce or, alternatively, our earnings could decrease if we increase our wage rates. A violation or change in
employment laws and/or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.

Inability to acquire and provide quality merchandise at competitive prices could adversely affect our sales
and results of operations.

We are dependent upon our domestic and international vendors continuing to supply us with quality merchandise
at favorable prices and payment terms. If our merchandise offerings do not meet our customers’ expectations
regarding quality and safety, we could experience lost sales, increased costs and exposure to legal and reputational
risk. All of our vendors must comply with applicable product safety laws, and we are dependent on them to ensure
that the products we buy comply with all safety and quality standards. Events that give rise to actual, potential or
perceived product safety concerns could expose us to government enforcement action or private litigation and
result in costly product recalls and other liabilities. To the extent our suppliers are subject to added government
regulation of their product design and/or manufacturing processes, the cost of the merchandise we purchase may
rise. In addition, negative customer perceptions regarding the safety or quality of the products we sell could cause
our customers to seek alternative sources for their needs, resulting in lost sales. In those circumstances, it may be
difficult and costly for us to rebuild our reputation and regain the confidence of our customers. Moreover, our
vendors are impacted by global economic conditions. Credit market and other macroeconomic conditions could
have a material adverse effect on the ability of our suppliers to finance and operate their businesses, resulting in
increased product costs and difficulties in meeting our inventory demands. If we experience transitions or
changeover with any of our significant vendors, or if they experience financial difficulties or otherwise are unable
to deliver merchandise to us on a timely basis, or at all, we could have product shortages in our stores that could
adversely affect customers’ perceptions of us and cause us to lose customers and sales.

We directly imported approximately 13% of our purchases in fiscal 2018, but many of our domestic vendors
directly import their products or components of their products. Disruptions in the price or flow of these goods for
any reason, such as political unrest or acts of war, currency fluctuations, disruptions in maritime lanes, port labor
disputes and economic conditions and instability in the countries in which foreign suppliers are located, the
financial instability of suppliers, suppliers' failure to meet our standards, issues with labor practices of our
suppliers or labor problems they may experience (such as strikes, stoppages or slowdowns, which could also
increase labor costs during and following the disruption), the availability and cost of raw materials to suppliers,
increased import duties or tariffs, merchandise quality or safety issues, transport availability and cost, increases in
wage rates and taxes, transport security, inflation and other factors relating to the suppliers and the countries in
which they are located or from which they import, are beyond our control and could adversely affect our
operations and profitability. In addition, the United States' foreign trade policies, tariffs and other impositions on
imported goods, trade sanctions imposed on certain countries, the limitation on the importation of certain types of
goods or of goods containing certain materials from other countries and other factors relating to foreign trade and
port labor agreements are beyond our control. These and other factors affecting our suppliers and our access to
products could adversely affect our business and financial performance. As we increase our imports of
merchandise from foreign vendors, the risks associated with these imports will also increase.

Our ability to grow depends in part on new location openings, existing location remodels and expansions
and effective utilization of our existing supply chain and hub network.

Our continued growth and success will depend in part on our ability to open and operate new locations and
expand and remodel existing locations to meet customers’ needs on a timely and profitable basis. Accomplishing
our new and existing location expansion goals will depend upon a number of factors, including the ability to
partner with developers and landlords to obtain suitable sites for new and expanded locations at acceptable costs,

the hiring and training of qualified personnel and the integration of new locations into existing operations. There
can be no assurance we will be able to achieve our location expansion goals, manage our growth effectively,
successfully integrate the planned new locations into our operations or operate our new, remodeled and expanded
locations profitably.

In addition, we extensively utilize our hub network, our supply chain and logistics management techniques to
efficiently stock our locations. We have made, and plan to continue to make, significant investments in our supply
chain to improve our ability to provide the best parts at the right price and to meet consumer product needs. If we
fail to effectively utilize our existing hubs and/or supply chains or if our investments in our supply chain
initiatives, including directly sourcing some products from outside the United States, do not provide the
anticipated benefits, we could experience sub-optimal inventory levels in our locations or increases in our
operating costs, which could adversely affect our sales volume and/or our margins.

Our failure to protect our reputation could have a material adverse effect on our brand name and
profitability.

We believe our continued strong sales growth is driven in significant part by our brand name. The value in our
brand name and its continued effectiveness in driving our sales growth are dependent to a significant degree on
our ability to maintain our reputation for safety, high product quality, friendliness, service, trustworthy advice,
integrity and business ethics. Any negative publicity about these areas could damage our reputation and may
result in reduced demand for our merchandise. The increasing use of technology also poses a risk as customers are
able to quickly compare products and prices and use social media to provide feedback in a manner that is rapidly
and broadly dispersed. Our reputation could be impacted if customers have a bad experience and share it over
social media.

Failure to comply with ethical, social, product, labor, environmental, and anti-corruption standards could also
jeopardize our reputation and potentially lead to various adverse actions by consumer or environmental groups,
employees or regulatory bodies. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, to maintain an effective
system of internal controls or to provide accurate and timely financial statement information could also hurt our
reputation. If we fail to comply with existing or future laws or regulations, we may be subject to governmental or
judicial fines or sanctions, while incurring substantial legal fees and costs. In addition, our capital and operating
expenses could increase due to implementation of and compliance with existing and future laws and regulations or
remediation measures that may be required if we are found to be noncompliant with any existing or future laws or
regulations. The inability to pass through any increased expenses through higher prices would have an adverse
effect on our results of operations.

Damage to our reputation or loss of consumer confidence for any of these or other reasons could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition, as well as require additional resources to
rebuild our reputation.

Our success in international operations is dependent on our ability to manage the unique challenges
presented by international markets.

The various risks we face in our U.S. operations generally also exist when conducting operations in and sourcing
products and materials from outside of the U.S., in addition to the unique costs, risks and difficulties of managing
international operations. Our expansion into international markets may be adversely affected by local laws and
customs, U.S. laws applicable to foreign operations, and political and socio-economic conditions.

Risks inherent in international operations also include potential adverse tax consequences, potential changes to
trade policies and trade agreements, compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and local anti-bribery and
anti-corruption laws, greater difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights, challenges to identify and gain
access to local suppliers, and possibly misjudging the response of consumers in foreign countries to our product
assortment and marketing strategy.

1
0
-
K

In addition, our operations in international markets are conducted primarily in the local currency of those
countries. Since our Consolidated Financial Statements are denominated in U.S. dollars, amounts of assets,
liabilities, net sales, and other revenues and expenses denominated in local currencies must be translated into U.S.
dollars using exchange rates for the current period. As a result, foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in
those rates may adversely impact our financial performance.

Failure to protect or effectively respond to a breach of the privacy and security of customers’, suppliers’,
AutoZoners’ or Company information could damage our reputation, subject us to litigation, and cause us
to incur substantial costs.

Our business, like that of most retailers and distributors, involves the receipt, storage and transmission of personal
information about our customers, suppliers and AutoZoners, some of which is entrusted to third-party service
providers and vendors. Failure to protect the security of our customers’, suppliers’, employees’ and company
information could subject us to costly regulatory enforcement actions, expose us to litigation and impair our
reputation, which may have a negative impact on our sales. While we and our third-party service providers and
vendors take significant steps to protect customer, supplier, employee and other confidential information,
including maintaining compliance with payment card industry standards, these security measures may be
breached in the future due to cyber-attack, employee error, system compromises, fraud, trickery, hacking or other
intentional or unintentional acts, and unauthorized parties may obtain access to this data. Failure to effectively
respond to system compromises may undermine our security measures. The methods used to obtain unauthorized
access are constantly evolving, and may be difficult to anticipate or detect for long periods of time. As the
regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly
rigorous, compliance with these requirements could also result in significant additional costs.

We accept payments using a variety of methods, including cash, checks, credit, debit, electronic payments and gift
cards, and we may offer new payment options over time, which may have information security risk implications.
As a retailer accepting debit and credit cards for payment, we are subject to various industry data protection
standards and protocols, such as the American National Standards Institute encryption standards and payment
network security operating guidelines and Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. Even though we
comply with these standards and protocols and other information security measures, we cannot be certain that the
security measures we maintain to protect all of our information technology systems are able to prevent, contain or
detect any cyber-attacks, cyber terrorism, or security breaches from known cyber-attacks or malware that may be
developed in the future. To the extent that any cyber-attack or intrusion in our or one of our third-party service
provider’s information systems results in the loss, damage or misappropriation of information, we may be
materially adversely affected by claims from customers, financial institutions, regulatory authorities, payment
card networks and others. In certain circumstances, payment card association rules and obligations to which we
are subject under our contracts with payment card processors make us liable to payment card issuers if
information in connection with payment cards and payment card transactions that we hold is compromised, which
liabilities could be substantial. In addition, the cost of complying with stricter and more complex data privacy,
data collection and information security laws and standards could be significant to us.

We rely heavily on our information technology systems for our key business processes. Any failure or
interruption in these systems could have a material adverse impact on our business.

We rely extensively on our information technology systems, some of which are managed or provided by third-
party service providers, to manage inventory, communicate with customers, process transactions and summarize
results. Our systems and the third-party systems we rely on are subject to damage or interruption from power
outages, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches, malicious cyber-attacks, catastrophic
events, and design or usage errors by our AutoZoners, contractors or third-party service providers. Although we
and our third-party service providers work diligently to maintain our respective systems, we may not be successful
in doing so.

If our systems are damaged or fail to function properly, we may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them,
and may experience loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in our ability to manage inventories or process
transactions, which could result in lost sales, inability to process purchase orders and/or a potential loss of
customer loyalty, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Business interruptions may negatively impact our location hours, operability of our computer and other
systems, availability of merchandise and otherwise have a material negative effect on our sales and our
business.

War or acts of terrorism, political unrest, unusual weather conditions, hurricanes, tornadoes, windstorms, fires,
earthquakes, floods and other natural or other disasters or the threat of any of them, may result in certain of our
locations being closed for a period of time or permanently or have a negative impact on our ability to obtain
merchandise available for sale in our locations. Some of our merchandise is imported from other countries. If
imported goods become difficult or impossible to bring into the United States, and if we cannot obtain such
merchandise from other sources at similar costs, our sales and profit margins may be negatively affected.

In the event that commercial transportation is curtailed or substantially delayed, our business may be adversely
impacted, as we may have difficulty shipping merchandise to our distribution centers and locations resulting in
lost sales and/or a potential loss of customer loyalty. Transportation issues could also cause us to cancel purchase
orders if we are unable to receive merchandise in our distribution centers.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

The following table reflects the square footage and number of leased and owned properties for our stores as of
August 25, 2018:

Leased .......................................................................................................
Owned .......................................................................................................
Total ..........................................................................................................

No. of
Stores

3,251
2,951
6,202

Store Square
Footage
21,124,799
19,941,207
41,066,006

1
0
-
K

We have approximately 5.8 million square feet in distribution centers servicing our stores, of which
approximately 1.8 million square feet is leased and the remainder is owned. Our 12 distribution centers are located
in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and two in
Mexico. Our primary store support center is located in Memphis, Tennessee, and consists of approximately
260,000 square feet. We also have three additional store support centers located in Monterrey, Mexico;
Chihuahua, Mexico and Sao Paulo, Brazil. The ALLDATA headquarters in Elk Grove, California is leased, and
we also own or lease other properties that are not material in the aggregate.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In 2004, we acquired a store site in Mount Ephraim, New Jersey that had previously been the site of a gasoline
service station and contained evidence of groundwater contamination. Upon acquisition, we voluntarily reported
the groundwater contamination issue to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) and
entered into a Voluntary Remediation Agreement providing for the remediation of the contamination associated
with the property. We have conducted and paid for (at an immaterial cost to us) remediation of contamination on
the property.

We have also voluntarily investigated and addressed potential vapor intrusion impacts in downgradient residences
and businesses. The NJDEP has asserted, in a Directive and Notice to Insurers dated February 19, 2013 and again
in an Amended Directive and Notice to Insurers dated January 13, 2014 (collectively the “Directives”), that we
are liable for the downgradient impacts under a joint and severable liability theory. By letter dated April 23, 2015,
NJDEP has demanded payment from us, and other parties, in the amount of approximately $296 thousand for
costs incurred by NJDEP in connection with contamination downgradient of the property. By letter dated January
29, 2016, we were informed that NJDEP has filed a lien against the property in connection with approximately
$355 thousand in costs incurred by NJDEP in connection with contamination downgradient of the property. We
have contested, and will continue to contest, any such assertions due to the existence of other entities/sources of

contamination, some of which are named in the Directives and the April 23, 2015 Demand, in the area of the
property. Pursuant to the Voluntary Remediation Agreement, upon completion of all remediation required by the
agreement, we believe we should be eligible to be reimbursed up to 75% of qualified remediation costs by the
State of New Jersey. We have asked the state for clarification that the agreement applies to off-site work.
Although the aggregate amount of additional costs that we may incur pursuant to the remediation cannot currently
be ascertained, we do not currently believe that fulfillment of our obligations under the agreement or otherwise
will result in costs that are material to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2014, we received a subpoena from the District Attorney of the County of Alameda, along with other
environmental prosecutorial offices in the state of California, seeking documents and information related to the
handling, storage and disposal of hazardous waste. We received notice that the District Attorney will seek
injunctive and monetary relief. We are cooperating fully with the request and cannot predict the ultimate outcome
of these efforts, although we have accrued all amounts we believe to be probable and reasonably estimable. We do
not believe the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.

Arising out of an April 2016 letter from the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”), one of our formerly-
owned subsidiaries was sued in March 2018 by CARB seeking penalties, among other relief, for alleged
violations of the California Health and Safety Code, Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations and the
California Vehicle Code related to the sale and advertisement of certain aftermarket motor vehicle pollution
control parts in the State of California. On February 26, 2018, we completed our transaction to sell substantially
all of the assets, net of assumed liabilities related to our AutoAnything operations. As part of the sale, we retained
the liability related to this lawsuit. We are cooperating fully with the lawsuit and cannot predict the ultimate
outcome of these efforts. We do not believe that any resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business, including, but not
limited to, several lawsuits containing class-action allegations in which the plaintiffs are current and former
hourly and salaried employees who allege various wage and hour violations and unlawful termination practices.
We do not currently believe that, either individually or in the aggregate, these matters will result in liabilities
material to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

1
0
-
K

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AZO.” On October 22, 2018,
there were 2,233 stockholders of record, which does not include the number of beneficial owners whose shares
were represented by security position listings.

We currently do not pay a dividend on our common stock. Our ability to pay dividends is subject to limitations
imposed by Nevada law. Any future payment of dividends would be dependent upon our financial condition,
capital requirements, earnings and cash flow.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of common stock, as reported by the New
York Stock Exchange, for the periods indicated:

Price Range of Common Stock

Fiscal Year ended August 25, 2018:
Fourth quarter .............................................................................................
Third quarter ...............................................................................................
Second quarter ............................................................................................
First quarter ................................................................................................

Fiscal Year Ended August 26, 2017:
Fourth quarter .............................................................................................
Third quarter ...............................................................................................
Second quarter ............................................................................................
First quarter ................................................................................................

High
$ 771.37
$ 735.90
$ 796.95
$ 629.43

$ 709.98
$ 741.05
$ 809.87
$ 779.61

Low
$ 602.00
$ 595.84
$ 632.40
$ 522.38

$ 493.15
$ 682.99
$ 714.99
$ 722.44

During 1998, the Company announced a program permitting the Company to repurchase a portion of its
outstanding shares not to exceed a dollar maximum established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The
program was most recently amended on September 26, 2018 to increase the repurchase authorization by $1.25
billion, bringing total value of authorized share repurchases to $20.9 billion.

Shares of common stock repurchased by the Company during the quarter ended August 25, 2018, were as follows:

1
0
-
K

Period
May 6, 2018, to June 2, 2018 ..........
June 3, 2018, to June 30, 2018 ........
July 1, 2018, to July 28, 2018 .........
July 29, 2018, to August 25, 2018 ..
Total ................................................

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased

Average
Price Paid
per Share
646.72
676.58
691.25
719.41
682.56
$

228,067 $
264,892
283,073
198,036
974,068

Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs

228,067
264,892
283,073
198,036
974,068

Maximum Dollar
Value that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs

749,051,559
569,831,573
374,157,362
231,688,900
231,688,900

The Company also repurchased, at market value, an additional 11,816, 12,455 and 12,460 shares in fiscal years
2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, from employees electing to sell their stock under the Company’s Sixth
Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Employee Plan”), qualified under Section 423 of the
Internal Revenue Code, under which all eligible employees may purchase AutoZone’s common stock at 85% of
the lower of the market price of the common stock on the first day or last day of each calendar quarter through
payroll deductions. Maximum permitted annual purchases are $15,000 per employee or 10 percent of
compensation, whichever is less. Under the Employee Plan, 14,523, 14,205 and 12,662 shares were sold to
employees in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At August 25, 2018, 163,777 shares of common stock
were reserved for future issuance under the Employee Plan.

Once executives have reached the maximum purchases under the Employee Plan, the Fifth Amended and Restated
Executive Stock Purchase Plan (the “Executive Plan”) permits all eligible executives to purchase AutoZone’s
common stock up to 25 percent of his or her annual salary and bonus. Purchases by executives under the
Executive Plan were 1,840, 1,865 and 1,943 shares in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At August 25,
2018, 238,048 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under the Executive Plan.

Stock Performance Graph
The graph below presents changes in the value of AutoZone’s stock as compared to Standard & Poor’s 500
Composite Index (“S&P 500”) and to Standard & Poor’s Retail Index (“S&P Retail Index”) for the five-year
period beginning August 31, 2013 and ending August 25, 2018.

1
0
-
K

200%

180%

160%

140%

120%

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

AutoZone

S&P 500

S&P Retail
Index

Aug-13

Aug-14

Aug-15

Aug-16

Aug-17

Aug-18

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

(in thousands, except per share data, same store sales and selected
operating data)
Income Statement Data
Net sales .............................................................................................
Cost of sales, including warehouse and delivery expenses .................
Gross profit .........................................................................................
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses(1) ..................
Operating profit(1) ...............................................................................
Interest expense, net ...........................................................................
Income before income taxes ...............................................................
Income tax expense(2)(3) .......................................................................
Net income(2)(3) ....................................................................................

2018

Fiscal Year Ended August
2016

2015

2017

$ 11,221,077
5,247,331
5,973,746
4,162,890
1,810,856
174,527
1,636,329
298,793
1,337,536

$ 10,888,676
5,149,056
5,739,620
3,659,551
2,080,069
154,580
1,925,489
644,620
1,280,869

$ 10,635,676
5,026,940
5,608,736
3,548,341
2,060,395
147,681
1,912,714
671,707
1,241,007

$ 10,187,340
4,860,309
5,327,031
3,373,980
1,953,051
150,439
1,802,612
642,371
1,160,241

Diluted earnings per share(2) ...............................................................

48.77

44.07

40.70

Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share(2) ..................

27,424

29,065

30,488

36.03

32,206

2014

9,475,313
4,540,406
4,934,907
3,104,684
1,830,223
167,509
1,662,714
592,970
1,069,744

31.57

33,882

Same Store Sales
Increase in domestic comparable store net sales(4) ..............................

Balance Sheet Data
Current assets .....................................................................................
Working capital (deficit) ....................................................................
Total assets .........................................................................................
Current liabilities ................................................................................
Debt ....................................................................................................
Long-term capital leases .....................................................................
Stockholders’ (deficit) ........................................................................

Selected Operating Data
Number of locations at beginning of year ...........................................
Acquired locations(5) .........................................................................
Sold locations(6) ................................................................................
New locations ...................................................................................
Closed locations ...............................................................................
Net new locations .............................................................................
Relocated locations ..........................................................................
Number of locations at end of year ....................................................

AutoZone domestic commercial programs .........................................
Inventory per location (in thousands) .................................................
Total AutoZone store square footage (in thousands) ...........................
Average square footage per AutoZone store .......................................
Increase in AutoZone store square footage .........................................
Average net sales per AutoZone store (in thousands) .........................
Net sales per AutoZone store square foot ...........................................
Total employees at end of year (in thousands) ....................................
Inventory turnover(7) ...........................................................................
Accounts payable to inventory ratio ...................................................
After-tax return on invested capital(8)..................................................
Adjusted debt to EBITDAR(9) ............................................................

Net cash provided by operating activities (in thousands)(2) .................
Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt
(in thousands)(10) .................................................................................
Share repurchases (in thousands) .......................................................
Number of shares repurchased (in thousands) ....................................

1.8%

0.5%

2.4%

3.8%

2.8%

4,635,869
(392,812)
9,346,980
5,028,681
5,005,930
102,013
(1,520,355)

4,611,255
(155,046)
9,259,781
4,766,301
5,081,238
102,322
(1,428,377)

4,239,573
(450,747)
8,599,787
4,690,320
4,924,119
102,451
(1,787,538)

3,970,294
(742,579)
8,102,349
4,712,873
4,624,876
87,639
(1,701,390)

3,580,612
(960,482)
7,497,163
4,541,094
4,323,106
83,098
(1,621,857)

6,029
–
26
201
2
199
7
6,202

4,741
636
41,066
6,621
3.5%
1,778
269
89
1.3x
111.8%
32.1%
2.5

2,080,292

1,596,367
1,592,013
2,398

$
$

5,814
–
–
215
–
215
5
6,029

4,592
644
39,684
6,611
3.9%
1,756
266
87
1.4x
107.4%
29.9%
2.6

1,570,612

1,017,585
1,071,649
1,495

$
$

5,609
–
–
205
–
205
6
5,814

4,390
625
38,198
6,600
3.8%
1,773
269
84
1.4x
112.8%
31.3%
2.5

1,641,060

1,166,987
1,452,462
1,903

$
$

5,391
17
–
202
1
201
5
5,609

4,141
610
36,815
6,587
3.9%
1,761
268
81
1.4x
112.9%
31.2%
2.5

$
$

5,201
–
–
190
–
190
8
5,391

3,845
582
35,424
6,571
4.0%
1,724
263
76
1.5x
114.9%
32.1%
2.5

1,573,018

1,365,005

1,018,440 $
1,271,416
$
2,010

924,706
1,099,212
2,232

1
0
-
K

(1) Fiscal 2018 was negatively impacted by the pension termination charges of $130.3 million (pre-tax)

recognized in the fourth quarter and asset impairments of $193.2 million (pre-tax) recognized in the second
quarter of fiscal 2018. See “Note M – Sale of Assets” and “Note L – Pension and Savings Plans” of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

(2) Fiscal 2018 and 2017 include excess tax benefits from stock option exercises of $31.3 million and $31.2
million, respectively, related to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation
(Topic 718): Improvement to Employee Share-based Payment Accounting. The Company adopted ASU 2016-
09 effective August 28, 2016 and applied the recognition of excess tax deficiencies and tax benefits in the

1
0
-
K

income statement on a prospective basis. Income tax expense, net income and diluted earnings per share
amounts presented for prior periods were not restated. The Company applied ASU 2016-09 relating to the
presentation of the excess tax benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows retrospectively. Prior
period amounts for net cash provided by operating activities for all years presented above were restated to
conform to the current period presentation.

(3) Fiscal 2018 includes a benefit to net income related to Tax Reform. See“Note D – Income Taxes”of the Notes

to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

(4) The domestic comparable sales increases are based on sales for all AutoZone domestic stores open at least
one year. Relocated stores are included in the same store sales computation based on the year the original
store was opened. Closed store sales are included in the same store sales computation up to the week it
closes, and excluded from the computation for all periods subsequent to closing. All sales through our
www.autozone.com website, including consumer direct ship-to-home sales, are also included in the
computation.

(5) 17 IMC branches acquired on September 27, 2014.
(6) 26 IMC branches were sold on April 4, 2018. See “Note M – Sale of Assets”of the Notes to Consolidated

Financial Statements for more information.

(7) Inventory turnover is calculated as cost of sales divided by the average merchandise inventory balance over

the trailing 5 quarters.

(8) After-tax return on invested capital is defined as after-tax operating profit (excluding rent charges) divided by
invested capital (which includes a factor to capitalize operating leases). For fiscal 2018, after-tax operating
profit was adjusted for impairment charges, pension termination charges and the impact of the revaluation of
deferred tax liabilities, net of repatriation tax. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

(9) Adjusted debt to EBITDAR is defined as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and annual rents times
six; divided by net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and share-based compensation
expense. For fiscal 2018, net income was adjusted for impairment charges and pension termination charges
before tax impact. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

(10) Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt is defined as the change in cash and cash

equivalents less the change in debt plus treasury stock purchases. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial
Measures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We are the nation’s leading retailer, and a leading distributor, of automotive replacement parts and accessories in
the United States. We began operations in 1979 and at August 25, 2018, operated 5,618 stores in the United
States, including Puerto Rico; 564 stores in Mexico; and 20 stores in Brazil. Each store carries an extensive
product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive
hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products. At August 25, 2018, in 4,741 of our
domestic stores, we also had a commercial sales program that provides commercial credit and prompt delivery of
parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service stations and public sector
accounts. We also have commercial programs in stores in Mexico and Brazil. We also sell the ALLDATA brand
automotive diagnostic and repair software through www.alldata.com and www.alldatadiy.com. Additionally, we
sell automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products through
www.autozone.com, and our commercial customers can make purchases through www.autozonepro.com. We do
not derive revenue from automotive repair or installation services.

Executive Summary

For fiscal 2018, we achieved record net income of $1.338 billion, a 4.4% increase over the prior year, and sales
growth of $332.4 million, a 3.1% increase over the prior year. Both our retail sales and commercial sales grew this
past year, as we continue to make progress on our initiatives that are aimed at improving our ability to say yes to
our customers more frequently, drive traffic to our stores and accelerate our commercial growth.

Our business is impacted by various factors within the economy that affect both our consumer and our industry,
including but not limited to fuel costs, wage rates, and other economic conditions. Given the nature of these
macroeconomic factors, we cannot predict whether or for how long certain trends will continue, nor can we
predict to what degree these trends will impact us in the future.

One macroeconomic factor affecting our customers and our industry during fiscal 2018 was gas prices. During
fiscal 2018, the average price per gallon of unleaded gasoline in the United States was $2.67 per gallon, compared
to $2.31 per gallon during fiscal 2017. We believe fluctuations in gas prices impact our customers’ level of
disposable income. With approximately 12 billion gallons of unleaded gas consumption each month across the
U.S., each $1 increase at the pump reduces approximately $12 billion of additional spending capacity to
consumers each month. Given the unpredictability of gas prices, we cannot predict whether gas prices will
increase or decrease, nor can we predict how any future changes in gas prices will impact our sales in future
periods.

We have also experienced accelerated pressure on wages in the United States during fiscal 2018. Some of this is
attributed to regulatory changes in certain states and municipalities, while the larger portion is being driven by
general market pressures with lower unemployment rates and some specific actions taken in recent years by other
retailers. The regulatory changes are going to continue, as evidenced by the areas that have passed legislation to
increase their wages substantially over the next few years, but we are still assessing to what degree these changes
will impact our earnings growth in future periods.

During fiscal 2018, failure and maintenance related categories represented the largest portion of our sales mix, at
approximately 84% of total sales, with failure related categories continuing to comprise our largest set of
categories. While we have not experienced any fundamental shifts in our category sales mix as compared to
previous years, in our domestic stores we did experience a slight increase in mix of sales of the failure category as
compared to last year. We believe the improvement in this sales category was driven by differences in regional
weather patterns and improved merchandise assortments due to the products we have added over the last year.
Our sales mix can be impacted by severe or unusual weather over a short term period. Over the long term, we
believe the impact of the weather on our sales mix is not significant.

1
0
-
K

Our primary response to fluctuations in the demand for the products we sell is to adjust our advertising message,
store staffing and product assortment. In recent years, we closely studied our hub distribution model, store
inventory levels and product assortment, which led to strategic tests on increased frequency of delivery to our
domestic stores and significantly expanding parts assortment in select domestic stores we call mega hubs. During
fiscal 2018, we completed our testing and implemented new frequencies resulting in approximately 25% of our
stores, representing 40% of our retail sales volume and nearly 50% of our commercial sales volume, receiving
distribution center deliveries three or more times per week.

The two statistics we believe have the closest correlation to our market growth over the long-term are miles driven
and the number of seven year old or older vehicles on the road.

Miles Driven
We believe that as the number of miles driven increases, consumers’ vehicles are more likely to need service and
maintenance, resulting in an increase in the need for automotive hard parts and maintenance items. While over the
long-term we have seen a close correlation between our net sales and the number of miles driven, we have also
seen certain time frames of minimal correlation in sales performance and miles driven. During the periods of
minimal correlation between net sales and miles driven, we believe net sales have been positively impacted by
other factors, including the number of seven year old or older vehicles on the road. Since the beginning of the
fiscal year and through July 2018 (latest publicly available information), miles driven in the U.S. increased by
0.5% compared to the same period in the prior year.

Seven Year Old or Older Vehicles
New vehicles sales declined 1.5% during 2018 as compared to the prior year, which is the first year-over-year
decrease since 2009. We estimate vehicles are driven an average of approximately 12,500 miles each year. In
seven years, the average miles driven equates to approximately 87,500 miles. Our experience is that at this point
in a vehicle’s life, most vehicles are not covered by warranties and increased maintenance is needed to keep the
vehicle operating.

According to the latest data provided by the Auto Care Association, as of January 1, 2018, the average age of
vehicles on the road was 11.7 years. For the seventh consecutive year, the average age of vehicles has exceeded
11 years.

We expect the aging vehicle population to continue to increase as consumers keep their cars longer in an effort to
save money. As the number of seven year old or older vehicles on the road increases, we expect an increase in
demand for the products we sell.

Results of Operations

Fiscal 2018 Compared with Fiscal 2017
For the fiscal year ended August 25, 2018, we reported net sales of $11.221 billion compared with $10.889 billion
for the year ended August 26, 2017, a 3.1% increase from fiscal 2017. This growth was driven primarily by net
sales of $196.5 million from new domestic stores and a domestic same store sales increase of 1.8%. Domestic
commercial sales increased $151.4 million, or 7.3%, over domestic commercial sales for fiscal 2017.

At August 25, 2018, we operated 5,618 domestic stores, 564 in Mexico and 20 in Brazil, compared with 5,465
domestic stores, 524 in Mexico, 14 in Brazil and 26 IMC branches at August 26, 2017. We reported a total auto
parts segment (domestic, Mexico, Brazil and IMC through April 4, 2018) sales increase of 4.1% for fiscal 2018.

1
0
-
K

Gross profit for fiscal 2018 was $5.974 billion, or 53.2% of net sales, a 53 basis point increase compared with
$5.740 billion, or 52.7% of net sales for fiscal 2017. The increase in gross margin was attributable to the favorable
impact of the sale of two businesses (+34 basis points) and higher merchandise margins, partially offset by higher
supply chain costs.

Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2018 increased to $4.163 billion, or 37.1% of net
sales, from $3.660 billion, or 33.6% of net sales for fiscal 2017. The increase in operating expenses, as a
percentage of sales, was primarily due to second quarter impairment charges (-172 basis points), and fourth
quarter charges related to the termination of our pension plans (-116 basis points). See “Note M – Sale of Assets”
and “Note L – Pension and Savings Plan” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest expense, net for fiscal 2018 was $174.5 million compared with $154.6 million during fiscal 2017. This
increase was primarily due to higher borrowing rates. Average borrowings for fiscal 2018 were $4.997 billion,
compared with $5.070 billion for fiscal 2017, and weighted average borrowing rates were 3.2% for fiscal 2018,
compared to 2.8% for fiscal 2017.

Our effective income tax rate was 18.3% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2018 compared to 33.5% for fiscal 2017.
The lower tax rate resulted primarily from the enactment of Tax Reform during the second quarter ended February
10, 2018 (see “Note D - Income Taxes” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Net income for fiscal 2018 increased by 4.4% to $1.338 billion, and diluted earnings per share increased 10.7% to
$48.77 from $44.07 in fiscal 2017. The impact on the fiscal 2018 diluted earnings per share from stock
repurchases was an increase of $1.36.

Fiscal 2017 Compared with Fiscal 2016
For the fiscal year ended August 26, 2017, we reported net sales of $10.889 billion compared with $10.636 billion
for the year ended August 27, 2016, a 2.4% increase from fiscal 2016. This growth was driven primarily by net
sales of $172.5 million from new domestic AutoZone stores and domestic same store sales increase of 0.5%.
Domestic commercial sales increased $110.9 million, or 5.7%, over domestic commercial sales for fiscal 2016.

At August 26, 2017, we operated 5,465 domestic AutoZone stores, 524 in Mexico, 14 in Brazil, and 26 IMC
branches compared with 5,297 domestic AutoZone stores, 483 in Mexico, eight in Brazil and 26 IMC branches at
August 27, 2016. We reported a total auto parts (domestic, Mexico, Brazil and IMC) sales increase of 2.6% for
fiscal 2017.

Gross profit for fiscal 2017 was $5.740 billion, or 52.7% of net sales, a 2 basis point decrease compared with
$5.609 billion, or 52.7% of net sales for fiscal 2016. The slight decline in gross margin was attributable to higher
supply chain costs (-20 basis points) associated with current year inventory initiatives, partially offset by higher
merchandise margins.

Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2017 increased to $3.660 billion, or 33.6% of net
sales, from $3.548 billion, or 33.4% of net sales for fiscal 2016. The increase in operating expenses, as a
percentage of sales, was primarily due to deleverage on occupancy costs (-23 basis points) and domestic store
payroll driven by higher wage pressure.

Interest expense, net for fiscal 2017 was $154.6 million compared with $147.7 million during fiscal 2016. This
increase was primarily due to higher borrowing levels and rates. Average borrowings for fiscal 2017 were $5.070
billion, compared with $4.860 billion for fiscal 2016, and weighted average borrowing rates were 2.8% for fiscal
2017, compared to 2.7% for fiscal 2016.

Our effective income tax rate was 33.5% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2017 compared to 35.1% for fiscal 2016.
The decrease in the tax rate was primarily due to the Company’s adoption of the new accounting guidance for
share-based payments, which lowered the effective tax rate by 162 basis points.

Net income for fiscal 2017 increased by 3.2% to $1.281 billion, and diluted earnings per share increased 8.3% to
$44.07 from $40.70 in fiscal 2016. The impact of the fiscal 2017 stock repurchases on diluted earnings per share
in fiscal 2017 was an increase of approximately $1.03.

Seasonality and Quarterly Periods

Our business is somewhat seasonal in nature, with the highest sales typically occurring in the spring and summer
months of February through September, in which average weekly per-store sales historically have been about 10%
to 20% higher than in the slower months of December and January. During short periods of time, a store’s sales
can be affected by weather conditions. Extremely hot or extremely cold weather may enhance sales by causing
parts to fail; thereby increasing sales of seasonal products. Mild or rainy weather tends to soften sales, as parts
failure rates are lower in mild weather and elective maintenance is deferred during periods of rainy weather. Over
the longer term, the effects of weather balance out, as we have locations throughout the United States, Puerto
Rico, Mexico and Brazil.

Each of the first three quarters of our fiscal year consists of 12 weeks, and the fourth quarter consisted of 16
weeks in 2018, 2017 and 2016. Because the fourth quarter contains seasonally high sales volume and consists of
16 weeks, compared with 12 weeks for each of the first three quarters, our fourth quarter represents a
disproportionate share of the annual net sales and net income. The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2018 represented
31.7% of annual sales and 29.9% of net income; the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 represented 32.3% of
annual sales and 33.9% of net income; and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 represented 32.0% of annual sales and
34.4% of net income.

Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform”) into law. Tax
Reform contains several key provisions that affected the Company during fiscal 2018. The enacted provisions
impacting the current financial statements include a mandatory one-time transition tax on certain earnings of
foreign subsidiaries and a permanent reduction of the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35 to 21%, effective
January 1, 2018. As the Company has an August 25th fiscal year-end, the impact of the lower rate will be blended
resulting in a U.S. statutory federal tax rate of approximately 25.9% for the fiscal year ending August 25, 2018,
and a 21% U.S. statutory federal rate for fiscal years thereafter. Other enacted provisions which may impact the
Company beginning in fiscal 2019 include: eliminating U.S. federal taxation of future remitted foreign earnings;
other new international provisions requiring current inclusion of certain earnings of controlled foreign
corporations; immediate expensing of capital assets; and limitations on other tax deductions such as deductibility
of executive compensation, interest expense, lobbying expenses, meals and entertainment expenses, and the
domestic production activities deduction.

1
0
-
K

The Company has withdrawn its assertion regarding the permanent reinvestment of current and accumulated
earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries, but maintained its permanent reinvestment assertion on other basis differences
related to non-U.S. subsidiaries.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118) to
address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations where a registrant does not have the necessary information
available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for
certain income tax effects of Tax Reform. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax
effects of Tax Reform is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional
estimate in the financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the
financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were
in effect immediately before the enactment of Tax Reform. The ultimate impact may differ from provisional
amounts recorded, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations
and assumptions the Company has made, and additional regulatory guidance that may be issued. The accounting
is expected to be completed within one year from the enactment date of Tax Reform.

Based on our current analysis, we recorded a provisional income tax benefit of $131.5 million in our Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended August 25, 2018. We were able to determine a reasonable estimate for the
mandatory one-time transition tax as an increase tax expense of $25.8 million and for the re-measurement of our
net U.S. federal deferred tax liability at the lower rate, a reduction to tax expense of $157.3 million. Our analysis
of these items is incomplete at this time. We will complete the accounting for these items during the measurement
period, which will not extend beyond one year from the enactment date.

Our effective income tax rate was 18.3% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2018 compared to 33.5% for fiscal 2017.
The lower tax rate resulted from the $131.5 million provisional amount discussed above, $31.3 million of excess
tax benefits from option exercises, and a $119.2 million benefit from the reduction of the U.S. statutory rate from
35% to approximately 25.9%.

1
0
-
K

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The primary source of our liquidity is our cash flows realized through the sale of automotive parts, products and
accessories. Net cash provided by operating activities was $2.080 billion in 2018, $1.571 billion in 2017, and
$1.641 billion in fiscal 2016. Cash flows from operations are favorable compared to last year primarily due to the
timing of payment of accounts payable and growth in net income due to the benefits of Tax Reform.

Our primary capital requirement has been the funding of our continued new-location development program and
the building of new distribution centers. From the beginning of fiscal 2016 to August 25, 2018, we have opened
621 new locations. We opened two distribution centers in fiscal 2017 and one in fiscal 2018. Net cash flows used
in investing activities were $521.9 million in fiscal 2018, compared to $553.6 million in fiscal 2017 and $505.8
million in fiscal 2016. We invested $521.8 million in capital assets in fiscal 2018, compared to $553.8 million in
fiscal 2017 and $488.8 million in fiscal 2016. The decrease in capital expenditures from fiscal 2017 was primarily
attributable to the construction of the one distribution center in fiscal 2018 compared to two distribution centers in
fiscal 2017. We had new location openings of 201 for fiscal 2018, 215 for fiscal 2017, and 205 for fiscal 2016.
Cash flows were also used in the purchase of other intangibles for $10 million in fiscal 2016. We invest a portion
of our assets held by our wholly owned insurance captive in marketable securities. We purchased $104.5 million
in marketable securities in fiscal 2018, $85.7 million in fiscal 2017 and $130.2 million in fiscal 2016. We had
proceeds from the sale of marketable securities of $69.6 million in fiscal 2018, $83.0 million in fiscal 2017 and
$120.5 million in fiscal 2016.

Net cash used in financing activities was $1.632 billion in 2018, $914.3 million in 2017 and $1.117 billion in
fiscal 2016. The net cash used in financing activities reflected purchases of treasury stock which totaled $1.592
billion for fiscal 2018, $1.072 billion for fiscal 2017 and $1.452 billion for fiscal 2016. The treasury stock
purchases in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 were primarily funded by cash flows from operations. The Company did
not issue any new debt in fiscal 2018 compared to $600 million for fiscal 2017 and $650 million for fiscal 2016.
In fiscal 2018, we used commercial paper borrowings to repay the $250 million Senior Notes due in August 2018.
In fiscal 2017, the proceeds from the issuance of debt were used for the repayment of a portion of our outstanding
commercial paper borrowings, which were used to repay the $400 million Senior Notes due in January 2017.

In fiscal 2016, the proceeds from the issuance of debt were used for general corporate purposes, including for
working capital requirements, capital expenditures, store openings and stock repurchases. In fiscal 2016, we used
commercial paper borrowings to repay the $300 million Senior Notes due in November 2015 and the $200 million
Senior Notes due in June 2016. Net proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper and short-term borrowings
for fiscal 2018 were $170.2 million. In 2017, we made net repayments of commercial paper and short-term
borrowings in the amount of $42.4 million. Net proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper and short-term
borrowings for fiscal 2016 were $149.9 million.

During fiscal 2019, we expect to increase the investment in our business as compared to fiscal 2018. Our
investments are expected to be directed primarily to new locations, supply chain infrastructure, enhancements to
existing locations and investments in technology. The amount of investments in our new locations is impacted by
different factors, including such factors as whether the building and land are purchased (requiring higher
investment) or leased (generally lower investment), located in the United States, Mexico or Brazil, or located in
urban or rural areas. During fiscal 2018, our capital expenditures decreased by approximately 6% compared to the
prior year period. In 2017 and 2016, our capital expenditures increased by approximately 13% and 2%,
respectively, as compared to the prior year.

In addition to the building and land costs, our new locations require working capital, predominantly for
inventories. Historically, we have negotiated extended payment terms from suppliers, reducing the working
capital required and resulting in a high accounts payable to inventory ratio. We plan to continue leveraging our
inventory purchases; however, our ability to do so may be limited by our vendors’ capacity to factor their
receivables from us. Certain vendors participate in financing arrangements with financial institutions whereby
they factor their receivables from us, allowing them to receive payment on our invoices at a discounted rate. In
recent years, we initiated a variety of strategic tests focused on increasing inventory availability, which increased
our inventory per location. Many of our vendors have supported our initiative to update our product assortments
by providing extended payment terms. These extended payment terms have allowed us to continue our high
accounts payable to inventory ratio. We had an accounts payable to inventory ratio of 111.8% at August 25, 2018,
107.4% at August 26, 2017, and 112.8% at August 27, 2016. The increase from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2018 was
primarily due to more favorable vendor terms.

Depending on the timing and magnitude of our future investments (either in the form of leased or purchased
properties or acquisitions), we anticipate that we will rely primarily on internally generated funds and available
borrowing capacity to support a majority of our capital expenditures, working capital requirements and stock
repurchases. The balance may be funded through new borrowings. We anticipate that we will be able to obtain
such financing in view of our credit ratings and favorable experiences in the debt markets in the past.

Our cash balances are held in various locations around the world. As of August 25, 2018, and August 26, 2017,
cash and cash equivalents of $98.8 million and $148.4 million, respectively, were held outside of the U.S. and
were generally utilized to support liquidity needs in our foreign operations.

For the fiscal year ended August 25, 2018, our after-tax return on invested capital (“ROIC”) was 32.1% as
compared to 29.9% for the comparable prior year period. ROIC is calculated as after-tax operating profit
(excluding rent charges) divided by invested capital (which includes a factor to capitalize operating leases). For
fiscal 2018, after-tax operating profit was adjusted for impairment charges, pension termination charges and Tax
Reform’s impact on the revaluation of deferred tax liabilities, net of the repatriation tax. The increase in ROIC is
primarily due to the decrease in average debt, along with increased net income due to Tax Reform. We use ROIC
to evaluate whether we are effectively using our capital resources and believe it is an important indicator of our
overall operating performance. Refer to the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for
further details of our calculation.

Debt Facilities
We entered into a Master Extension, New Commitment and Amendment Agreement dated as of November 18,
2017 (the “Extension Amendment”) to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
November 18, 2016, as amended, modified, extended or restated from time to time (the “Revolving Credit
Agreement”). Under the Extension Amendment: (i) our borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit
Agreement was increased from $1.6 billion to $2.0 billion; (ii) our option to increase the borrowing capacity
under the Revolving Credit Agreement was “refreshed” and the amount of such option remained at $400 million;

1
0
-
K

the maximum borrowing under the Revolving Credit Agreement may, at our option, subject to lenders approval,
be increased from $2.0 billion to $2.4 billion; (iii) the termination date of the Revolving Credit Agreement was
extended from November 18, 2021 until November 18, 2022; and (iv) we have the option to make one additional
written request of the lenders to extend the termination date then in effect for an additional year. Under the
Revolving Credit Agreement, we may borrow funds consisting of Eurodollar loans, base rate loans or a
combination of both. Interest accrues on Eurodollar loans at a defined Eurodollar rate, defined as LIBOR plus the
applicable percentage, as defined in the Revolving Credit Agreement, depending upon our senior,
unsecured, (non-credit enhanced) long-term debt ratings. Interest accrues on base rate loans as defined in the
Revolving Credit Agreement. As of August 25, 2018, we had $3.3 million of outstanding letters of credit under
the Revolving Credit Agreement.

The Revolving Credit Agreement requires that our consolidated interest coverage ratio as of the last day of each
quarter shall be no less than 2.5:1. This ratio is defined as the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before interest,
taxes and rents to (ii) consolidated interest expense plus consolidated rents. Our consolidated interest coverage
ratio as of August 25, 2018 was 5.8:1.

As of August 25, 2018, $1.325 billion of commercial paper borrowings and the $250 million 1.625% Senior Notes
due April 2019 were classified as long-term in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as we have the ability and intent
to refinance on a long-term basis through available capacity in our revolving credit facilities. As of August 25,
2018, we had $1.997 billion of availability under our $2.0 billion revolving credit facility, which would allow us
to replace these short-term obligations with long-term financing facilities.

1
0
-
K

We also maintain a letter of credit facility that allows us to request the participating bank to issue letters of credit
on our behalf up to an aggregate amount of $75 million. The letter of credit facility is in addition to the letters of
credit that may be issued under the Revolving Credit Agreement. As of August 25, 2018 we had $71.0 million in
letters of credit outstanding under the letter of credit facility, which expires June 2019.

In addition to the outstanding letters of credit issued under the committed facilities discussed above, we had $32.5
million in letters of credit outstanding as of August 25, 2018. These letters of credit have various maturity dates
and were issued on an uncommitted basis.

On April 18, 2017, we issued $600 million in 3.750% Senior Notes due June 2027 under our shelf registration
statement filed with the SEC on April 15, 2015 (the “2015 Shelf Registration”). The 2015 Shelf Registration
allowed us to sell an indeterminate amount of debt securities to fund general corporate purposes, including
repaying, redeeming or repurchasing outstanding debt and for working capital, capital expenditures, new location
openings, stock repurchases and acquisitions. Proceeds from the debt issuance were used for general corporate
purposes.

On April 21, 2016, we issued $400 million in 3.125% Senior Notes due April 2026 and $250 million in 1.625%
Senior Notes due April 2019 under the 2015 Shelf Registration. Proceeds from the debt issuances were used for
general corporate purposes.

All senior notes are subject to an interest rate adjustment if the debt ratings assigned to the senior notes are
downgraded (as defined in the agreements). Further, the senior notes contain a provision that repayment of the
senior notes may be accelerated if we experience a change in control (as defined in the agreements). Our
borrowings under our senior notes contain minimal covenants, primarily restrictions on liens. Under our revolving
credit facilities, covenants include restrictions on liens, a maximum debt to earnings ratio, a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio and a change of control provision that may require acceleration of the repayment
obligations under certain circumstances. All of the repayment obligations under our borrowing arrangements may
be accelerated and come due prior to the scheduled payment date if covenants are breached or an event of default
occurs.

As of August 25, 2018, we were in compliance with all covenants related to our borrowing arrangements and
expect to remain in compliance with those covenants in the future.

For the fiscal year ended August 25, 2018, our adjusted debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization, rent and share-based compensation expense (“EBITDAR”) ratio was 2.5:1 as compared to 2.6:1 as
of the comparable prior year end. We calculate adjusted debt as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and
rent times six; and we calculate EBITDAR by adding interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and share-
based compensation expense to net income. For fiscal 2018, net income was adjusted to exclude impairment
charges and pension termination charges before tax impact as these charges are not reflective of ongoing
operations. We target our debt levels to a specified ratio of adjusted debt to EBITDAR in order to maintain our
investment grade credit ratings and believe this is important information for the management of our debt levels.

To the extent EBITDAR continues to grow in future years, we expect our debt levels to increase; conversely, if
EBITDAR declines, we would expect our debt levels to decrease. Refer to the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP
Financial Measures” section for further details of our calculation.

Stock Repurchases
During 1998, we announced a program permitting us to repurchase a portion of our outstanding shares not to
exceed a dollar maximum established by our Board of Directors (the “Board”). On March 20, 2018, the Board
voted to increase the authorization by $1.0 billion. This raised the total value of shares authorized to be
repurchased to $19.65 billion. From January 1998 to August 25, 2018, we have repurchased a total of 144.7
million shares at an aggregate cost of $19.418 billion. We repurchased 2.4 million shares of common stock at an
aggregate cost of $1.592 billion during fiscal 2018, 1.5 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of
$1.072 billion during fiscal 2017, and 1.9 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $1.452 billion
during fiscal 2016. Considering cumulative repurchases as of August 25, 2018, we had $231.7 million remaining
under the Board’s authorization to repurchase our common stock.

For the fiscal year ended August 25, 2018, cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt was $1.596
billion as compared to $1.018 billion during the comparable prior year period. Cash flow before share repurchases
and changes in debt is calculated as the net increase or decrease in cash and cash equivalents less increases in debt
plus share repurchases. We use cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt to calculate the cash flows
remaining and available in an effort to increase shareholder value in the form of share repurchases. We believe
this is important information regarding our allocation of available capital where we prioritize investments in the
business and utilize the remaining funds to repurchase shares, while maintaining debt levels that support our
investment grade credit ratings. If we allowed these funds to accumulate on our balance sheet instead of
repurchasing our shares, we believe our earnings per share and stock price would be negatively impacted. Refer to
the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for further details of our calculation.

On September 26, 2018, the Board voted to increase the authorization by $1.25 billion. This brings the total value
of shares authorized to $20.9 billion. Subsequent to August 25, 2018, we have repurchased 346,979 shares of
common stock at an aggregate cost of $263.4 million. Considering the cumulative repurchases and the increase in
authorization subsequent to August 25, 2018, we have $1.22 billion remaining under the Board’s authorization to
repurchase our common stock.

1
0
-
K

Financial Commitments
The following table shows our significant contractual obligations as of August 25, 2018:

(in thousands)

Total
Contractual
Obligations

Less than
1 year

Payment Due by Period
Between
3-5 years

Between
1-3 years

Over
5 years

Debt(1)................................................ $ 5,025,300 $ 1,575,300 $ 750,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,400,000
Interest payments(2) ...........................
153,500
Operating leases(3) .............................
823,969
Capital leases(4) .................................
–
Self-insurance reserves(5) ..................
42,452
–
Construction commitments ...............
$ 8,274,060 $ 2,179,604 $ 1,696,929 $ 1,977,606 $ 2,419,921

657,250
2,141,163
165,686
243,337
41,324

158,687
460,023
24,329
34,567
–

121,063
300,866
52,290
88,761
41,324

224,000
556,305
89,067
77,557
–

1
0
-
K

(1) Debt balances represent principal maturities, excluding interest, discounts, and debt issuance costs.
(2) Represents obligations for interest payments on long-term debt.
(3) Operating lease obligations are inclusive of amounts accrued within deferred rent and closed store

obligations reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(4) Capital lease obligations include related interest.
(5) Self-insurance reserves reflect estimates based on actuarial calculations. Although these obligations do not
have scheduled maturities, the timing of future payments are predictable based upon historical patterns.
Accordingly, we reflect the net present value of these obligations in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Our tax liability for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, was $16.5 million at August 25,
2018. Approximately $1.1 million is classified as current liabilities and $15.4 million is classified as long-term
liabilities. We did not reflect these obligations in the table above as we are unable to make an estimate of the
timing of payments of the long-term liabilities due to uncertainties in the timing and amounts of the settlement of
these tax positions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The following table reflects outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds as of August 25, 2018:

(in thousands)

Standby letters of credit ..........................................................................................................
Surety bonds ...........................................................................................................................

Total
Other
Commitments

106,773
23,571
130,344

A substantial portion of the outstanding standby letters of credit (which are primarily renewed on an annual basis)
and surety bonds are used to cover reimbursement obligations to our workers’ compensation carriers.
There are no additional contingent liabilities associated with these instruments as the underlying liabilities are
already reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The standby letters of credit and surety bond arrangements
expire within one year, but have automatic renewal clauses.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

“Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” include certain financial measures not derived in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (“GAAP”). These non-GAAP financial measures provide additional information for determining our
optimum capital structure and are used to assist management in evaluating performance and in making appropriate
business decisions to maximize stockholders’ value.

Non-GAAP financial measures should not be used as a substitute for GAAP financial measures, or considered in
isolation, for the purpose of analyzing our operating performance, financial position or cash flows. However, we
have presented the non-GAAP financial measures, as we believe they provide additional information that is useful

to investors as it indicates more clearly our comparative year-to-year operating results. Furthermore, our
management and Compensation Committee of the Board use the above-mentioned non-GAAP financial measures
to analyze and compare our underlying operating results and use select measurements to determine payments of
performance-based compensation. We have included a reconciliation of this information to the most comparable
GAAP measures in the following reconciliation tables.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: Cash Flow Before Share Repurchases and Changes in Debt
The following table reconciles net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents to cash flow before share
repurchases and changes in debt, which is presented in “Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:

(in thousands)

2018

Net cash provided by/(used in):
Operating activities(1) ..................... $ 2,080,292
Investing activities .........................
(521,860)
Financing activities(1) ..................... (1,632,154)
Effect of exchange rate changes

Fiscal Year Ended August
2016

2015

2017

2014

$ 1,570,612
(553,599)
(914,329)

$ 1,641,060
(505,835)
(1,116,528)

$ 1,573,018
(567,911)
(944,597)

$ 1,365,005
(447,968)
(935,328)

on cash ........................................

(1,724)

852

(4,272)

(9,686)

585

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and

cash equivalents .............................

(75,446)

$ 103,536

14,425

50,824

(17,706)

Less: (Decrease)/increase in debt,

excluding deferred financing costs .

(79,800)
Plus: Share repurchases .................... 1,592,013
Cash flow before share repurchases

157,600
1,071,649

299,900
1,452,462

303,800
1,271,416

156,800
1,099,212

and changes in debt ........................

$ 1,596,367

$ 1,017,585

$ 1,166,987

$ 1,018,440

$ 924,706

1
0
-
K

(1) The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation

(Topic 718): Improvement to Employee Share-based Payment Accounting, as of August 28, 2016. We
have applied ASU 2016-09 relating to the presentation of the excess tax benefits on the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows retrospectively. Prior period amounts for net cash provided by operating and
financing activities for all years presented above were restated to conform to the current period
presentation.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: After-tax ROIC
The following table calculates the percentage of ROIC. ROIC is calculated as after-tax operating profit (excluding
rent) divided by invested capital (which includes a factor to capitalize operating leases). For Fiscal 2018, after-tax
operating profit was adjusted for impairment charges, pension settlement charges and the impact of the
revaluation of deferred tax liabilities, net of repatriation tax. The ROIC percentages are presented in “Selected
Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:

(in thousands, except percentages)

2018

Fiscal Year Ended August
2016

2017

2015

2014

Net income ....................................... $ 1,337,536 $ 1,280,869 $ 1,241,007 $ 1,160,241 $ 1,069,744
Adjustments:

Impairment before tax impact .....
Pension termination charges

before tax impact .....................
Interest expense ..........................
Rent expense ..............................
Tax effect(1).................................
Deferred tax liabilities, net of

193,162

–

130,263
174,527
315,580
(211,806)

–
154,580
302,928
(153,265)

–

147,681
280,490
(150,288)

150,439
269,458
(149,483)

–

–
167,509
253,813
(150,412)

repatriation tax ........................

–
After-tax return ................................. $ 1,807,149 $ 1,585,112 $ 1,518,890 $ 1,430,655 $ 1,340,654

(132,113)

–

1
0
-
K

Average debt(2) ................................. $ 5,013,678 $ 5,061,502 $ 4,820,402 $ 4,458,114 $ 4,258,796
Average (deficit)(3) ........................... (1,433,196)
(1,730,559) (1,774,329) (1,619,596) (1,709,778)
Rent x 6(4) ......................................... 1,893,480
1,682,940 1,616,748 1,522,878
1,817,568
Average capital lease obligations(5)
108,475
150,066
156,198
Invested capital ................................. $ 5,630,160 $ 5,298,577 $ 4,860,021 $ 4,581,362 $ 4,180,371
32.1%
ROIC ................................................

126,096

131,008

31.2%

31.3%

29.9%

32.1%

(1) The effective tax rate during fiscal 2018 was 24.2% for impairment, 28.1% for pension termination and

26.2% for interest and rent expense. For fiscal 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014 the effective tax rate was 33.5%,
35.1%, 35.6% and 35.7%, respectively.

(2) Average debt is equal to the average of our debt measured as of the previous five quarters.
(3) Average deficit is equal to the average of our stockholders’ (deficit) measured as of the previous five

quarters.

(4) Rent is multiplied by a factor of six to capitalize operating leases in the determination of pre-tax invested

capital.

(5) Average capital lease obligations is computed as the average of our capital lease obligations over the

previous five quarters.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR
The following table calculates the ratio of adjusted debt to EBITDAR. Adjusted debt to EBITDAR is calculated
as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and annual rents times six; divided by net income plus interest,
taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and share-based compensation expense. For fiscal 2018, net income was
adjusted to exclude impairment charges and pension termination charges before tax impact. The adjusted debt to
EBITDAR ratios are presented in “Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:

(in thousands, except ratios)

2018

Fiscal Year Ended August
2016

2017

2015

2014

Net income ..................................... $ 1,337,536 $ 1,280,869 $ 1,241,007 $ 1,160,241 $ 1,069,744
–
Add: Impairment before tax impact

193,162

–

Pension termination charges

before tax impact ...............
Interest expense .....................
Income tax expense ...............

130,263
174,527
298,793
EBIT ............................................... 2,134,281
Add: Depreciation and

–

–
150,439
642,371
2,080,069 2,060,395 1,953,051

147,681
671,707

154,580
644,620

–
167,509
592,970
1,830,223

345,084
315,580
43,674

323,051
302,928
38,244

amortization expense .........
Rent expense .........................
Share-based expense .............

251,267
253,813
39,390
EBITDAR ...................................... $ 2,838,619 $ 2,744,292 $ 2,678,107 $ 2,533,423 $ 2,374,693
Debt ................................................ $ 5,005,930 $ 5,081,238 $ 4,924,119 $ 4,624,876 $ 4,323,106
119,603
Capital lease obligations .................
154,303
1,522,878
Rent x 6 .......................................... 1,893,480
Adjusted debt.................................. $ 7,053,713 $ 7,049,262 $ 6,754,344 $ 6,369,791 $ 5,965,587
2.5
Adjusted debt to EBITDAR ...........

128,167
1,817,568 1,682,940 1,616,748

297,397
280,490
39,825

269,919
269,458
40,995

147,285

150,456

2.5

2.6

2.5

1
0
-
K

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note A of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion on recent accounting
pronouncements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions affecting the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period and related disclosures of contingent liabilities. In the notes to our
consolidated financial statements, we describe our significant accounting policies used in preparing the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Our policies are evaluated on an ongoing basis and are drawn from historical
experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could
differ under different assumptions or conditions. Our senior management has identified the critical accounting
policies for the areas that are materially impacted by estimates and assumptions and have discussed such policies
with the Audit Committee of our Board. The following items in our Consolidated Financial Statements represent
our critical accounting policies that require significant estimation or judgment by management:

Inventory Reserves and Cost of Sales
LIFO
We state our inventories at the lower of cost or market. Inventory cost has been determined using the last-in, first-
out (“LIFO”) method for domestic inventories and the weighted average cost method for Mexico and Brazil
inventories. Due to price deflation on our merchandise purchases, we have exhausted our LIFO reserve balance.
Our policy is to not write up inventory in excess of replacement cost, which is based on average cost. The
difference between LIFO cost and replacement cost, which will be reduced upon experiencing price inflation on
our merchandise purchases, was $452.4 million at August 25, 2018.

Inventory Obsolescence and Shrinkage
Our inventory, primarily hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products, is used on
vehicles that have rather long lives; and therefore, the risk of obsolescence is minimal and the majority of excess
inventory has historically been returned to our vendors for credit. In the isolated instances where less than full
credit will be received for such returns and where we anticipate that items will be sold at retail prices that are less
than recorded costs, we record a charge (less than $5 million in each of the last three years) through cost of sales
for the difference. These charges are based on management’s judgment, including estimates and assumptions
regarding marketability of products and the market value of inventory to be sold in future periods.

Historically, we have not encountered material exposure to inventory obsolescence or excess inventory, nor have
we experienced material changes to our estimates. However, we may be exposed to material losses should our
vendors alter their policy with regard to accepting excess inventory returns.

Additionally, we reduce inventory for projected losses related to shrinkage, which is estimated based on historical
losses and current inventory loss trends resulting from previous physical inventories. Shrinkage may occur due to
theft, loss or inaccurate records for the receipt of goods, among other things. Throughout the year, we take
physical inventory counts of our stores and distribution centers to verify these estimates. We make assumptions
regarding upcoming physical inventory counts that may differ from actual results.

Each quarter, we evaluate the accrued shrinkage in light of the actual shrink results from physical inventory
counts. To the extent our actual physical inventory count results differ from our estimates, we may experience
material adjustments to our financial statements. Historically, we have not experienced material adjustments to
our shrinkage estimates and do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in
the future estimates or assumptions we use. Over the last three years, there has been less than a 50 basis point
fluctuation in our shrinkage rate (shrink loss as a percent of sales).

1
0
-
K

A 10% difference in our inventory reserves as of August 25, 2018, would have affected net income by
approximately $8.6 million in fiscal 2018.

Vendor Allowances
We receive various payments and allowances from our vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements,
including allowances for warranties, advertising and general promotion of vendor products. Vendor allowances
are treated as a reduction of inventory, unless they are provided as a reimbursement of specific, incremental,
identifiable costs incurred by the Company in selling the vendor’s products. Approximately 83% of the vendor
funds received are recorded as a reduction of the cost of inventories and recognized as a reduction to cost of sales
as these inventories are sold.

Based on our vendor agreements, a significant portion of vendor funding we receive is earned as we purchase
inventory. Therefore, we record receivables for funding earned but not yet received as we purchase inventory.
During the year, we regularly review the receivables from vendors to ensure vendors are able to meet their
obligations. We generally have not recorded a reserve against these receivables as we have not experienced
significant losses and typically have a legal right of offset with our vendors for payments owed them. Historically,
we have had write-offs less than $1 million in each of the last three years.

Goodwill and Intangibles
We evaluate goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of each fiscal
year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying values exceed the current fair values.
We evaluate the likelihood of impairment by considering qualitative factors, such as macroeconomic, industry,
market, or any other factors that could impact the reporting unit’s fair value. If these factors indicate impairment,
we perform a quantitative assessment to determine if the carrying value exceeds the fair value. Goodwill is
evaluated at the reporting unit level and involves valuation methods including forecasting future financial
performance, estimates of discount rates and other factors. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill
exceeds the fair value, we recognize an impairment loss.

Indefinite-lived intangibles are evaluated by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the future discounted
cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset
exceeds the fair value based on the future discounted cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss. These
impairment analyses require a significant amount of subjective judgment by management, and as a result these
estimates are uncertain and our actual results may be different from our estimates.

The carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles at August 25, 2018 was $302.6 million related to
our Domestic Auto Parts reporting unit. The carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles at
August 26, 2017 was $418.8 million with $302.6 million related to our Domestic Auto Parts reporting unit, $89.8
million relating to our AutoAnything reporting unit and $26.4 million relating to our Interamerican Motor
Corporation reporting unit. During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company recorded impairment charges
related to its IMC and AutoAnything businesses as the Company determined that the approximate fair value less
costs to sell the businesses was significantly lower than the carrying value of the net assets. These businesses were
subsequently sold. See “Note M – Sale of Assets” for more information.

Self-Insurance Reserves
We retain a significant portion of the risks associated with workers’ compensation, employee health, general and
products liability, property and vehicle liability; and we obtain third party insurance to limit the exposure related
to certain of these risks. Our self-insurance reserve estimates totaled $223.0 million at August 25, 2018, and
$220.5 million at August 26, 2017. This change is primarily reflective of our growing operations, including
inflation, increases in healthcare costs, the number of vehicles and the number of hours worked, as well as our
historical claims experience.

The assumptions made by management in estimating our self-insurance reserves include consideration of
historical cost experience, judgments about the present and expected levels of cost per claim and retention levels.
We utilize various methods, including analyses of historical trends and actuarial methods, to estimate the cost to
settle reported claims and claims incurred but not yet reported. The actuarial methods develop estimates of the
future ultimate claim costs based on the claims incurred as of the balance sheet date. When estimating these
liabilities, we consider factors, such as the severity, duration and frequency of claims, legal costs associated with
claims, healthcare trends, and projected inflation of related factors. In recent history, our methods for determining
our exposure have remained consistent, and our historical trends have been appropriately factored into our reserve
estimates. As we obtain additional information and refine our methods regarding the assumptions and estimates
we use to recognize liabilities incurred, we will adjust our reserves accordingly.

Management believes that the various assumptions developed and actuarial methods used to determine our self-
insurance reserves are reasonable and provide meaningful data and information that management uses to make its
best estimate of our exposure to these risks. Arriving at these estimates, however, requires a significant amount of
subjective judgment by management, and as a result these estimates are uncertain and our actual exposure may be
different from our estimates. For example, changes in our assumptions about healthcare costs, the severity of
accidents and the incidence of illness, the average size of claims and other factors could cause actual claim costs
to vary materially from our assumptions and estimates, causing our reserves to be overstated or understated. For
instance, a 10% change in our self-insurance liability would have affected net income by approximately $16.6
million for fiscal 2018.

Our liabilities for workers’ compensation, general and product liability, property and vehicle claims do not have
scheduled maturities; however, the timing of future payments is predictable based on historical patterns and is
relied upon in determining the current portion of these liabilities. Accordingly, we reflect the net present value of
the obligations we determine to be long-term using the risk-free interest rate as of the balance sheet date.
If the discount rate used to calculate the present value of these reserves changed by 50 basis points, net income
would have been affected by approximately $2.2 million for fiscal 2018. Our liability for health benefits is
classified as current, as the historical average duration of claims is approximately six weeks.

1
0
-
K

Income Taxes
Our income tax returns are audited by state, federal and foreign tax authorities, and we are typically engaged in
various tax examinations at any given time. Tax contingencies often arise due to uncertainty or differing
interpretations of the application of tax rules throughout the various jurisdictions in which we operate. The
contingencies are influenced by items such as tax audits, changes in tax laws, litigation, appeals and prior
experience with similar tax positions.

We regularly review our tax reserves for these items and assess the adequacy of the amount we have recorded. As
of August 25, 2018, we had approximately $16.5 million reserved for uncertain tax positions.

We evaluate potential exposures associated with our various tax filings by estimating a liability for uncertain tax
positions based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining
if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on
audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate
and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate
settlement.

We believe our estimates to be reasonable and have not experienced material adjustments to our reserves in the
previous three years; however, actual results could differ from our estimates, and we may be exposed to gains or
losses that could be material. Specifically, management has used judgment and made assumptions to estimate the
likely outcome of uncertain tax positions. Additionally, to the extent we prevail in matters for which a liability has
been established, or must pay in excess of recognized reserves, our effective tax rate in any particular period could
be materially affected.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from, among other things, changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and fuel
prices. From time to time, we use various derivative instruments to reduce interest rate and fuel price risks. To
date, based upon our current level of foreign operations, no derivative instruments have been utilized to reduce
foreign exchange rate risk. All of our hedging activities are governed by guidelines that are authorized by the
Board. Further, we do not buy or sell derivative instruments for trading purposes.

Interest Rate Risk
Our financial market risk results primarily from changes in interest rates. At times, we reduce our exposure to
changes in interest rates by entering into various interest rate hedge instruments such as interest rate swap
contracts, treasury lock agreements and forward-starting interest rate swaps.

We have historically utilized interest rate swaps to convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt and to lock in fixed
rates on future debt issuances. We reflect the current fair value of all interest rate hedge instruments as a
component of either other current assets or accrued expenses and other. Our interest rate hedge instruments are
designated as cash flow hedges.

Unrealized gains and losses on interest rate hedges are deferred in stockholders’ deficit as a component of
Accumulated other comprehensive loss. These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income as a decrease or
increase to interest expense in the period in which the related cash flows being hedged are recognized in expense.
However, to the extent that the change in value of an interest rate hedge instrument does not perfectly offset the
change in the value of the cash flow being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in earnings.

The fair value of our debt was estimated at $4.948 billion as of August 25, 2018, and $5.171 billion as of August
26, 2017, based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar debt issues or on the current rates available to
us for debt having the same remaining maturities. Such fair value is less than the carrying value of debt by $57.5
million at August 25, 2018, which reflects its face amount, adjusted for any unamortized debt issuance costs and
discounts. At August 26, 2017, the fair value was greater than the carrying value of debt by $90.3 million. We had
$1.325 billion of variable rate debt outstanding at August 25, 2018, and $1.155 billion of variable rate debt
outstanding at August 26, 2017. In fiscal 2018, at this borrowing level for variable rate debt, a one percentage
point increase in interest rates would have had an unfavorable impact on our pre-tax earnings and cash flows of
approximately $13.3 million. The primary interest rate exposure on variable rate debt is based on LIBOR.

We had outstanding fixed rate debt of $3.681 billion, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $19.4 million, at
August 25, 2018, and $3.926 billion, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $23.9 million, at August 26, 2017.
A one percentage point increase in interest rates would reduce the fair value of our fixed rate debt by
approximately $153.6 million at August 25, 2018.

Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency exposures arising from transactions include firm commitments and anticipated transactions
denominated in a currency other than our entities’ functional currencies. To minimize our risk, we generally enter
into transactions denominated in the respective functional currencies. We are exposed to Brazilian reals, Canadian
dollars, euros, Chinese yuan renminbi and British pounds, but our primary foreign currency exposure arises from
Mexican peso-denominated revenues and profits and their translation into U.S. dollars. Foreign currency
exposures arising from transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are not material.

We view our investments in Mexican subsidiaries as long-term. As a result, we generally do not hedge these net
investments. The net asset exposure in the Mexican subsidiaries translated into U.S. dollars using the year-end
exchange rates was $590.7 million at August 25, 2018 and $519.3 million at August 26, 2017. The year-end
exchange rates with respect to the Mexican peso decreased by approximately 6% with respect to the U.S. dollar
during fiscal 2018 and increased by approximately 4% during fiscal 2017. The potential loss in value of our net
assets in the Mexican subsidiaries resulting from a hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in quoted foreign
currency exchange rates at August 25, 2018 and August 26, 2017, would be approximately $53.7 million and
approximately $47.2 million, respectively. Any changes in our net assets in the Mexican subsidiaries relating to
foreign currency exchange rates would be reflected in the foreign currency translation component of Accumulated
other comprehensive loss, unless the Mexican subsidiaries are sold or otherwise disposed.

A hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in average exchange rates would not have a material impact on our
results of operations.

1
0
-
K

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting ................................................................... 41
Certifications .......................................................................................................................................................... 41
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ................................................................................. 42
Consolidated Statements of Income ....................................................................................................................... 45
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income ............................................................................................. 45
Consolidated Balance Sheets.................................................................................................................................. 46
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ................................................................................................................ 47
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit ................................................................................................. 48
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements .......................................................................................................... 49

1
0
-
K

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our
internal control over financial reporting includes, among other things, defined policies and procedures for
conducting and governing our business, sophisticated information systems for processing transactions and
properly trained staff. Mechanisms are in place to monitor the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting, including regular testing performed by the Company’s internal audit team. Actions are taken to correct
deficiencies as they are identified. Our procedures for financial reporting include the active involvement of senior
management, our Audit Committee and a staff of highly qualified financial and legal professionals.

Management, with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers, assessed our internal control
over financial reporting as of August 25, 2018, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission 2013 framework.

Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of August 25, 2018.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, audited the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP’s attestation report on the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of August 25, 2018 is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

1
0
-
K

/s/ WILLIAM C. RHODES, III
William C. Rhodes, III
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ WILLIAM T. GILES
William T. Giles
Chief Financial Officer and Executive
Vice President – Finance and Information
Technology
(Principal Financial Officer)

Certifications

Compliance with NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards
On January 3, 2018, the Company submitted to the New York Stock Exchange the Annual CEO Certification
required pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual.

Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
The Company has filed, as exhibits to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2018,
the certifications of its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer required pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AutoZone, Inc.

Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited AutoZone Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 25, 2018, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, AutoZone, Inc. (the Company)
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 25, 2018,
based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of AutoZone, Inc. as of August 25, 2018 and August
26, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ deficit, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 25, 2018, and the related notes and our report
dated October 24, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

1
0
-
K

Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and
for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial
reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Memphis, Tennessee
October 24, 2018

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

1
0
-
K

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AutoZone, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AutoZone, Inc. (the Company) as of August
25, 2018 and August 26, 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 25, 2018, and the
related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at August 25,
2018 and August 26, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended August 25, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of August 25, 2018, based
on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated October 24, 2018, expressed
an unqualified opinion thereon.

1
0
-
K

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1988.
Memphis, Tennessee
October 24, 2018

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except per share data)

Year Ended

August 25,
2018
(52 weeks)

August 26,

2017
(52 weeks)

August 27,
2016
(52 weeks)

Net sales ...................................................................................
Cost of sales, including warehouse and delivery expenses .......
Gross profit ...............................................................................
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses ..........
Operating profit ........................................................................
Interest expense, net .................................................................
Income before income taxes .....................................................
Income tax expense ..................................................................
Net income ...............................................................................

$11,221,077
5,247,331
5,973,746
4,162,890
1,810,856
174,527
1,636,329
298,793
$ 1,337,536

$10,888,676
5,149,056
5,739,620
3,659,551
2,080,069
154,580
1,925,489
644,620
$ 1,280,869

$10,635,676
5,026,940
5,608,736
3,548,341
2,060,395
147,681
1,912,714
671,707
$ 1,241,007

Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share..............
Effect of dilutive stock equivalents ..........................................
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share ...........

26,970
454
27,424

28,430
635
29,065

29,889
599
30,488

Basic earnings per share ...........................................................
Diluted earnings per share ........................................................

$
$

49.59
48.77

$
$

45.05
44.07

$
$

41.52
40.70

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(in thousands)

August 25,
2018
(52 weeks)

Year Ended
August 26,

2017
(52 weeks)

August 27,

2016
(52 weeks)

Net income ..........................................................................................

$ 1,337,536

$ 1,280,869

$1,241,007

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Pension liability adjustments, net of taxes(1) ....................................
Foreign currency translation adjustments .........................................
Unrealized (losses) gains on marketable securities, net of taxes(2) ...
Net derivative activity, net of taxes(3) ...............................................
Total other comprehensive income (loss) ............................................

72,376
(53,085)
(862)
323
18,752

16,514
35,198
(131)
1,391
52,972

(18,095)
(39,524)
146
(538)
(58,011)

Comprehensive income .......................................................................

$ 1,356,288

$ 1,333,841

$1,182,996

(1) Pension liability adjustments are presented net of taxes of $46,523 in 2018, which includes $13,122 related to the

adoption of ASU 2018-02, $10,542 in 2017 and $11,394 in 2016.

(2) Unrealized (losses) gains on marketable securities are presented net of taxes of $234 in 2018, $69 in 2017 and $79

in 2016.

(3) Net derivative activities are presented net of taxes of $1,882 in 2018, which includes $1,367 related to the adoption

of ASU 2018-02, $814 in 2017 and $315 in 2016.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

1
0
-
K

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands)

Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ....................................................................................
Accounts receivable .............................................................................................
Merchandise inventories ......................................................................................
Other current assets ..............................................................................................
Total current assets .........................................................................................

Property and equipment:
Land .....................................................................................................................
Buildings and improvements................................................................................
Equipment ............................................................................................................
Leasehold improvements .....................................................................................
Construction in progress ......................................................................................

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization ..............................................

1
0
-
K

Goodwill ................................................................................................................
Deferred income taxes ...........................................................................................
Other long-term assets ...........................................................................................

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable .................................................................................................
Accrued expenses and other .................................................................................
Income taxes payable ...........................................................................................
Total current liabilities ....................................................................................

Long-term debt ......................................................................................................
Deferred income taxes ...........................................................................................
Other long-term liabilities .....................................................................................

Commitments and contingencies ...........................................................................

Stockholders’ deficit:

Preferred stock, authorized 1,000 shares; no shares issued ................................
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 200,000 shares; 27,530
shares issued and 25,742 shares outstanding in 2018 and 28,735 shares issued
and 27,833 shares outstanding in 2017...............................................................
Additional paid-in capital ...................................................................................
Retained deficit ..................................................................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive loss .............................................................
Treasury stock, at cost ........................................................................................
Total stockholders’ deficit ..............................................................................

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

August 25,
2018

August 26,
2017

$ 217,824
258,136
3,943,670
216,239
4,635,869

$ 293,270
280,733
3,882,086
155,166
4,611,255

1,107,092
3,698,010
1,841,330
504,656
140,535
7,291,623
3,073,223
4,218,400

302,645
34,620
155,446
492,711
$ 9,346,980

$ 4,409,372
606,894
12,415
5,028,681

5,005,930
285,204
547,520

–

1,056,187
3,423,056
1,704,653
470,998
218,299
6,873,193
2,842,175
4,031,018

391,887
35,308
190,313
617,508
$ 9,259,781

$ 4,168,940
563,350
34,011
4,766,301

5,081,238
371,111
469,508

–

275
1,155,426
(1,208,824)
(235,805)
(1,231,427)
(1,520,355)
$ 9,346,980

287
1,086,671
(1,642,387)
(254,557)
(618,391)
(1,428,377)
$ 9,259,781

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income ..................................................................................
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment

and intangibles .....................................................................
Amortization of debt origination fees .....................................
Deferred income taxes ............................................................
Share-based compensation expense ........................................
Pension plan contributions ......................................................
Pension termination charges ...................................................
Asset impairment ....................................................................

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable.............................................................
Merchandise inventories ......................................................
Accounts payable and accrued expenses .............................
Income taxes payable ..........................................................
Other, net .............................................................................
Net cash provided by operating activities ........................

Cash flows from investing activities:

Capital expenditures ................................................................
Purchase of intangibles ...........................................................
Proceeds from sale of assets ....................................................
Purchase of marketable securities ...........................................
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities ...........................
(Payments) proceeds from disposal of capital assets and
other, net .................................................................................
Net cash used in investing activities ................................

Cash flows from financing activities:

Year Ended

August 25,
2018
(52 weeks)

August 26,

August 27,

2017
(52 weeks)

2016
(52 weeks)

$ 1,337,536

$ 1,280,869

$ 1,241,007

345,084
8,393

(124,261)
43,674
(11,596)
130,263
193,162

7,534
(188,782)
319,609

(6,438)
26,114
2,080,292

323,051
8,369
74,902
38,244
(17,761)
–
–

297,397
7,980
45,019
39,825
(52,721)
–
–

7,795

(236,807)
82,614
(3,659)
12,995
1,570,612

(41,447)
(227,518)
271,198
50,122
10,198
1,641,060

(521,788)

–
35,279
(104,536)
69,644

(553,832)

–
–

(85,711)
82,993

(488,791)
(10,000)
–
(130,170)
120,472

(459)

(521,860)

2,951
(553,599)

2,654
(505,835)

Net proceeds from (payments of) commercial paper ..............
Proceeds from issuance of debt ...............................................
Repayment of debt ..................................................................
Net proceeds from sale of common stock ...............................
Purchase of treasury stock .......................................................
Payments of capital lease obligations......................................
Other, net.................................................................................
Net cash used in financing activities ................................

170,200
–

(250,000)
89,715
(1,592,013)
(49,004)
(1,052)
(1,632,154)

(42,400)
600,000
(400,000)
54,686
(1,071,649)
(47,604)
(7,362)
(914,329)

149,900
650,000
(500,000)
80,289
(1,452,462)
(36,320)
(7,935)
(1,116,528)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash ....................................

(1,724)

852

(4,272)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents .................
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year .........................
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ...................................

(75,446)
293,270
$ 217,824

103,536
189,734
$ 293,270

14,425
175,309
$ 189,734

Supplemental cash flow information:

Interest paid, net of interest cost capitalized ...........................
Income taxes paid....................................................................
Assets acquired through capital lease......................................

$ 163,965
$ 427,161
98,782
$

$ 135,331
$ 579,925
84,011
$

$ 136,731
$ 582,384
94,052
$

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

1
0
-
K

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit

(in thousands)

Balance at August 29, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of 1,903 shares of treasury stock . . . . . . . .
Retirement of treasury shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock under stock options and
stock purchase plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock

options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance at August 27, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of 1,495 shares of treasury stock . . . . . . . .
Retirement of treasury shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock under stock options and
stock purchase plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance at August 26, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of 2,398 shares of treasury stock . . . . . . . .
Retirement of treasury shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock under stock options and
stock purchase plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adoption of ASU 2018-02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1
0
-
K

Common
Shares
Issued

Common
Stock

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

32,098

321

$ 938,355

Retained
Deficit

$(1,418,738)
1,241,007

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

(249,518)

(58,011)

Treasury
Stock

Total

$ (971,810) $ (1,701,390)
1,241,007
(58,011)
(1,452,462)

(1,452,462)
1,491,499

(2,132)

(21)

(67,023)

(1,424,455)

363

80,286
39,298

63,731

30,329

303

1,054,647

(1,602,186)
1,280,869

(1,804)

(18)

(64,943)

(1,321,070)

210

54,684
42,283

28,735

287

1,086,671

(1,642,387)
1,337,536

(1,512)

(15)

(60,500)

(918,462)

307

89,712

39,543

14,489

(307,529)

(932,773)

52,972

(1,071,649)
1,386,031

(254,557)

(618,391)

18,752

(1,592,013)
978,977

–

80,289
39,298

63,731

(1,787,538)
1,280,869
52,972
(1,071,649)

–

54,686
42,283

(1,428,377)
1,337,536
18,752
(1,592,013)

–

89,715
14,489
39,543

Balance at August 25, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27,530

275

$ 1,155,426

$(1,208,824) $

(235,805) $ (1,231,427) $ (1,520,355)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note A – Significant Accounting Policies

Business: AutoZone, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“AutoZone” or the “Company”) are principally a
retailer and distributor of automotive replacement parts and accessories. At the end of fiscal 2018, the Company
operated 5,618 stores in the United States, including Puerto Rico; 564 stores in Mexico; and 20 stores in Brazil.
Each store carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new
and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products. At the
end of fiscal 2018, 4,741 of the domestic stores had a commercial sales program that provides commercial credit
and prompt delivery of parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service
stations and public sector accounts. The company also had commercial programs in stores in Mexico and Brazil.
The Company also sells the ALLDATA brand automotive diagnostic and repair software through
www.alldata.com and www.alldatadiy.com. Additionally, the Company sells automotive hard parts, maintenance
items, accessories, and non-automotive products through www.autozone.com, and its commercial customers can
make purchases through www.autozonepro.com. The Company does not derive revenue from automotive repair
or installation services.

Fiscal Year: The Company’s fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the last Saturday in August. Fiscal
2018, 2017 and 2016 represented 52 weeks.

Basis of Presentation: The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of AutoZone, Inc. and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.

Use of Estimates: Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the
reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities to prepare these financial statements.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of 90 days or less
at the date of purchase. Cash equivalents include proceeds due from credit and debit card transactions with
settlement terms of less than five days. Credit and debit card receivables included within cash and cash
equivalents were $51.0 million at August 25, 2018 and $48.3 million at August 26, 2017.

Cash balances are held in various locations around the world. Cash and cash equivalents of $98.8 million and
$148.4 million were held outside of the U.S. as of August 25, 2018, and August 26, 2017, respectively, and were
generally utilized to support liquidity needs in foreign operations.

Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable consists of receivables from commercial customers and vendors, and
is presented net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. AutoZone routinely grants credit to certain of its
commercial customers. The risk of credit loss in its trade receivables is substantially mitigated by the Company’s
credit evaluation process, short collection terms and sales to a large number of customers, as well as the low dollar
value per transaction for most of its sales. Allowances for potential credit losses are determined based on
historical experience and current evaluation of the composition of accounts receivable. Historically, credit losses
have been within management’s expectations and the balance of the allowance for uncollectible accounts was
$6.1 million at August 25, 2018, and $5.9 million at August 26, 2017.

Merchandise Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Merchandise inventories include
related purchasing, storage and handling costs. Inventory cost has been determined using the last-in, first-out
(“LIFO”) method for domestic inventories and the weighted average cost method for Mexico and Brazil
inventories. Due to price deflation on the Company’s merchandise purchases, the Company has exhausted its
LIFO reserve balance. The Company’s policy is to not write up inventory in excess of replacement cost.
The difference between LIFO cost and replacement cost, which will be reduced upon experiencing price inflation
on the Company’s merchandise purchases, was $452.4 million at August 25, 2018, and $414.9 million at August
26, 2017.

1
0
-
K

Marketable Securities: The Company invests a portion of its assets held by the Company’s wholly owned
insurance captive in marketable debt securities and classifies them as available-for-sale. The Company includes
these securities within the Other current assets and Other long-term assets captions in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets and records the amounts at fair market value, which is determined using quoted
market prices at the end of the reporting period. A discussion of marketable securities is included in “Note E –
Fair Value Measurements” and “Note F – Marketable Securities.”

Property and Equipment: Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed
principally using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: buildings, 40 to 50 years;
building improvements, 5 to 15 years; equipment, including software, 3 to 10 years; and leasehold improvements,
over the shorter of the asset’s estimated useful life or the remaining lease term, which includes any reasonably
assured renewal periods. Depreciation and amortization include amortization of assets under capital lease.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. When such
an event occurs, the Company compares the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows of the asset
(asset group) with the carrying amounts of the asset. If the undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than
the carrying value of the assets, the Company measures the amount of impairment loss as the amount by which
the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

1
0
-
K

Goodwill: The cost in excess of fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired is recorded as
goodwill. Goodwill has not been amortized since fiscal 2001, but an analysis is performed at least annually to
compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying amount to determine if any impairment exists. The
Company performs its annual impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, unless
circumstances dictate more frequent assessments. Refer to “Note N – Goodwill and Intangibles” for additional
disclosures regarding the Company’s goodwill and impairment assessment.

Intangible Assets: Intangible assets consist of customer relationships purchased relating to ALLDATA
operations. Amortizing intangible assets are amortized over periods ranging from 3 to 10 years. Refer to “Note N
– Goodwill and Intangibles” and “Note M – Sale of Assets” for additional disclosures regarding the Company’s
intangible assets and impairment assessment.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities: AutoZone is exposed to market risk from, among other things,
changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and fuel prices. From time to time, the Company uses various
derivative instruments to reduce such risks. To date, based upon the Company’s current level of foreign
operations, no derivative instruments have been utilized to reduce foreign exchange rate risk. All of the
Company’s hedging activities are governed by guidelines that are authorized by AutoZone’s Board of Directors
(the “Board”). Further, the Company does not buy or sell derivative instruments for trading purposes.

AutoZone’s financial market risk results primarily from changes in interest rates. At times, AutoZone reduces its
exposure to changes in interest rates by entering into various interest rate hedge instruments such as interest rate
swap contracts, treasury lock agreements and forward-starting interest rate swaps. All of the Company’s interest
rate hedge instruments are designated as cash flow hedges. Refer to “Note H – Derivative Financial Instruments”
for additional disclosures regarding the Company’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. Cash flows
related to these instruments designated as qualifying hedges are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows in the same categories as the cash flows from the items being hedged. Accordingly,
cash flows relating to the settlement of interest rate derivatives hedging the forecasted issuance of debt have been
reflected upon settlement as a component of financing cash flows. The resulting gain or loss from such settlement
is deferred to Accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified to interest expense over the term of the
underlying debt. This reclassification of the deferred gains and losses impacts the interest expense recognized on
the underlying debt that was hedged and is therefore reflected as a component of operating cash flows in periods
subsequent to settlement.

Foreign Currency: The Company accounts for its Mexican, Brazilian, Canadian, European, Chinese and British
operations using the local market currency and converts its financial statements from these currencies to U.S.
dollars. The cumulative loss on currency translation is recorded as a component of Accumulated other
comprehensive loss (see “Note G – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss”).

Self-Insurance Reserves: The Company retains a significant portion of the risks associated with workers’
compensation, employee health, general, products liability, property and vehicle insurance. Through various
methods, which include analyses of historical trends and utilization of actuaries, the Company estimates the costs
of these risks. The costs are accrued based upon the aggregate of the liability for reported claims and an estimated
liability for claims incurred but not reported. Estimates are based on calculations that consider historical lag and
claim development factors. The long-term portions of these liabilities are recorded at the Company’s estimate of
their net present value.

Deferred Rent: The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the course of the lease term,
which includes any reasonably assured renewal periods, beginning on the date the Company takes physical
possession of the property (see “Note O – Leases”). Differences between this calculated expense and cash
payments are recorded as a liability within the Accrued expenses and other and Other long-term liabilities
captions in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, based on the terms of the lease. Deferred rent
approximated $139.6 million as of August 25, 2018, and $130.2 million as of August 26, 2017.

Financial Instruments: The Company has financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, other current assets and accounts payable. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments
approximate fair value because of their short maturities. A discussion of the carrying values and fair values of the
Company’s debt is included in “Note I – Financing,” marketable securities is included in “Note F – Marketable
Securities,” and derivatives is included in “Note H – Derivative Financial Instruments.”

Income Taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities
and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to
reverse. Our effective tax rate is based on income by tax jurisdiction, statutory rates, and tax saving initiatives
available to the Company in the various jurisdictions in which we operate.

1
0
-
K

The Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain income tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step
is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is
more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or
litigation processes, if any. The second step requires the Company to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the
largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and
subjective to estimate such amounts, as the Company must determine the probability of various possible
outcomes. The Company reevaluates these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis or when new information
becomes available to management. These reevaluations are based on factors including, but not limited to, changes
in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, successfully settled issues under audit, expirations due to statutes
and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement could result in the recognition of a tax
benefit or an increase to the tax accrual.

The Company classifies interest related to income tax liabilities, and if applicable, penalties, as a component of
Income tax expense. The income tax liabilities and accrued interest and penalties that are expected to be payable
within one year of the balance sheet date are presented within the Accrued expenses and other caption in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining portion of the income tax liabilities and accrued
interest and penalties are presented within the Other long-term liabilities caption in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets because payment of cash is not anticipated within one year of the balance sheet date.
Refer to “Note D – Income Taxes” for additional disclosures regarding the Company’s income taxes.

Sales and Use Taxes: Governmental authorities assess sales and use taxes on the sale of goods and services. The
Company excludes taxes collected from customers in its reported sales results; such amounts are included within
the Accrued expenses and other caption until remitted to the taxing authorities.

Dividends: The Company currently does not pay a dividend on its common stock. The ability to pay dividends is
subject to limitations imposed by Nevada law. Under Nevada law, any future payment of dividends would be
dependent upon the Company’s financial condition, capital requirements, earnings and cash flow.

Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes sales at the time the sale is made and the product is delivered to
the customer. Revenue from sales are presented net of allowances for estimated sales returns, which are based on
historical return rates.

A portion of the Company's transactions include the sale of auto parts that contain a core component. The core
component represents the recyclable portion of the auto part. Customers are not charged for the core component
of the new part if a used core is returned at the point of sale of the new part; otherwise the Company charges
customers a specified amount for the core component. The Company refunds that same amount upon the customer
returning a used core to the store at a later date. The Company does not recognize sales or cost of sales for the
core component of these transactions when a used part is returned or expected to be returned from the customer.

Vendor Allowances and Advertising Costs: The Company receives various payments and allowances from its
vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements. Monies received from vendors include rebates,
allowances and promotional funds. The amounts to be received are subject to the terms of the vendor agreements,
which generally do not state an expiration date, but are subject to ongoing negotiations that may be impacted in
the future based on changes in market conditions, vendor marketing strategies and changes in the profitability or
sell-through of the related merchandise.

Rebates and other miscellaneous incentives are earned based on purchases or product sales and are accrued
ratably over the purchase or sale of the related product. These monies are generally recorded as a reduction of
merchandise inventories and are recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the related inventories are sold.

1
0
-
K

For arrangements that provide for reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs incurred by the
Company in selling the vendors’ products, the vendor funds are recorded as a reduction to Operating, selling,
general and administrative expenses in the period in which the specific costs were incurred.

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense, net of vendor promotional funds, was
$95.2 million in fiscal 2018, $93.1 million in fiscal 2017, and $98.3 million in fiscal 2016. Vendor promotional
funds, which reduced advertising expense, amounted to $25.3 million in fiscal 2018, $28.3 million in fiscal 2017,
and $21.4 million in fiscal 2016.

Cost of Sales and Operating, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses: The following illustrates the
primary costs classified in each major expense category:

Cost of Sales

(cid:120) Total cost of merchandise sold, including:

o Freight expenses associated with moving merchandise inventories from the Company’s vendors

to the distribution centers;

o Vendor allowances that are not reimbursements for specific, incremental and identifiable costs

(cid:120) Costs associated with operating the Company’s supply chain, including payroll and benefit costs,

warehouse occupancy costs, transportation costs and depreciation; and
Inventory shrinkage

(cid:120)

Operating, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

(cid:120) Payroll and benefit costs for store, field leadership and store support employees;
(cid:120) Occupancy costs of store and store support facilities;
(cid:120) Depreciation and amortization related to store and store support assets;
(cid:120) Transportation costs associated with field leadership, commercial sales force and hub deliveries;
(cid:120) Advertising;
(cid:120) Self insurance costs; and
(cid:120) Other administrative costs, such as credit card transaction fees, legal costs, supplies, and travel and

lodging

Warranty Costs: The Company or the vendors supplying its products provides the Company’s customers limited
warranties on certain products that range from 30 days to lifetime. In most cases, the Company’s vendors are
primarily responsible for warranty claims. Warranty costs relating to merchandise sold under warranty not
covered by vendors are estimated and recorded as warranty obligations at the time of sale based on each product’s

historical return rate. These obligations, which are often funded by vendor allowances, are recorded within the
Accrued expenses and other caption in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For vendor allowances that are in excess
of the related estimated warranty expense for the vendor’s products, the excess is recorded in inventory and
recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the related inventory is sold.

Shipping and Handling Costs: The Company does not generally charge customers separately for shipping and
handling. Substantially all the costs the Company incurs to ship products to our stores are included in cost of
sales.

Pre-opening Expenses: Pre-opening expenses, which consist primarily of payroll and occupancy costs, are
expensed as incurred.

Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average outstanding common shares.
Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the effect of
common stock equivalents, which are primarily stock options. There were 847,279 stock options excluded from
the diluted earnings per share calculation because they would have been anti-dilutive as of August 25, 2018. There
were 620,025 stock options excluded for the year ended August 26, 2017, and 329,900 stock options excluded for
the year ended August 27, 2016, because they would have been anti-dilutive.

Share-Based Payments: Share-based payments include stock option grants and certain other transactions under
the Company’s stock plans. The Company recognizes compensation expense for its share-based payments over
the requisite service period based on the fair value of the awards. See “Note B – Share-Based Payments” for
further discussion.

Risk and Uncertainties: In fiscal 2018, one class of similar products accounted for approximately 12 percent of
the Company’s total revenues, and one vendor supplied approximately 12 percent of the Company’s total
purchases. No other class of similar products accounted for 10 percent or more of total revenues, and no other
individual vendor provided more than 10 percent of total purchases.

1
0
-
K

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:
In March 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update
(“ASU”) No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 118. ASU 2018-05 provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the U.S. Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform”) pursuant to the Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which allows companies to
complete the accounting under Accounting Standard Codificiation (“ASC”) 740 within a one-year measurement
period from Tax Reform enactment date, which occurred for the purposes of the Company’s financial statements
during the quarter ended February 10, 2018, when the necessary information is not available, prepared, or
analyzed in sufficient detail to complete the accounting. The Company has applied this amendment. Refer to
“Note D – Income Taxes” in the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income:
Reclassification of Certain Tax effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows for the
reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") to retained earnings for the tax effects
on deferred tax items included within AOCI (referred to in the ASU as "stranded tax effects") resulting from the
reduction of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to 21% from 35% that was effected by the 2017 U.S. Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Tax Act"). ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company early adopted
ASU 2018-02 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, resulting in a $14.5 million reclassification from accumulated
other comprehensive income to retained deficit on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and a decrease in the
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU, along with
subsequent ASU’s issued to clarify certain provisions of ASU 2014-09, is a comprehensive new revenue
recognition model that expands disclosure requirements and requires a company to recognize revenue to depict
the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in
exchange for those goods or services. It also requires more detailed disclosures to enable users of financial
statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from
contracts with customers. Companies that transition to this new standard may either retrospectively restate each
prior reporting period or reflect the cumulative effect of initially applying the updates with an adjustment to
retained earnings at the date of adoption. The Company will adopt this standard using the modified retrospective
method beginning with our first quarter ending November 17, 2018. Results for annual reporting periods
beginning after August 25, 2018, will be presented under ASU 2014-09, while prior period amounts will not be
adjusted and will continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for the prior periods. The
Company’s primary source of revenue is derived from the sale of automotive aftermarket parts to our customers,
and generally, these performance obligations are satisfied the same day contracts with customers are initiated. As
such, the adoption of the new standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows, business process, controls or systems.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to
recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for all leases with terms greater than 12 months. Recognition,
measurement and presentation of expenses will depend on classification as a finance or operating lease. The
amendments also require certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures about leasing arrangements. Early
adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this standard using the required modified retrospective approach
at the beginning of fiscal 2020. The Company established a cross-functional implementation team to evaluate and
identify the impact of ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Based on the preliminary work completed, the Company has concluded its assessment on its leasing
arrangements, evaluated the impact of applying the practical expedients and accounting policy elections and is
currently working on implementing software to meet the reporting requirements of this standard. The Company is
also in the process of identifying changes to its business processes and controls to support adoption of the new
standard. The team is continuing to understand the full analysis of the adoption, but is unable to quantify the
impact at this time. The Company anticipates the adoption of this new standard to result in a significant increase
in lease-related assets and liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The impact on the Company’s
As the impact of this standard is non-cash in nature,
Consolidated Statements of Income is currently being evaluated.
the Company does not anticipate its adoption to have an impact on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of
Cash Flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets
Other than Inventory. ASU 2016-16 requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-
entity transfer of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The guidance must be applied using the
modified retrospective basis. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2016-16 to have a material
impact on its financial statements. This update will be effective for the Company at the beginning of its fiscal
2019 year.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of
a Business. ASU 2017-01 provides guidance to assist entities in evaluating whether transactions should be
accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The updated guidance requires a prospective
adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2017-01 to have a
material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements. This update will be effective for the Company at the
beginning of its fiscal 2019 year.

Note B – Share-Based Payments

Total share-based compensation expense (a component of Operating, selling, general and administrative
expenses) was $43.7 million for fiscal 2018, $38.2 million for fiscal 2017, and $39.8 million for fiscal 2016. As of
August 25, 2018, share-based compensation expense for unvested awards not yet recognized in earnings is $33.1
million and will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.82 years. As a result of the adoption of the
new accounting guidance for share-based payments in 2017, cash flows related to tax deductions in excess of
recognized compensation cost are classified as operating cash flows for each period presented. Retrospective
application of the cash flow presentation resulted in increases to both net cash provided by operations and net cash
required for financing activities of $63.7 million for fiscal 2016.

On December 15, 2010, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the “2011
Plan”), allowing the Company to provide equity-based compensation to non-employee directors and employees
for their service to AutoZone or its subsidiaries or affiliates. Prior to the Company’s adoption of the 2011 Plan,
equity-based compensation was provided to employees under the 2006 Stock Option Plan and to non-employee
directors under the 2003 Director Compensation Plan (the “2003 Comp Plan”) and the 2003 Director Stock
Option Plan (the “2003 Option Plan”).

During fiscal 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved the Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2011 Equity
Incentive Award Plan (the “Amended 2011 Equity Plan”). The Amended 2011 Equity Plan imposes a maximum
limit on the compensation, measured as the sum of any cash compensation and the aggregate grant date fair value
of awards granted under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan, which may be paid to non-employee directors for such
service during any calendar year. The Amended 2011 Equity Plan also applies a ten-year term on the Amended
2011 Equity Plan through December 16, 2025 and extends the Company’s ability to grant incentive stock options
through October 7, 2025.

The Company grants options to purchase common stock to certain of its employees under its plan at prices equal
to the market value of the stock on the date of grant. Options have a term of 10 years or 10 years and one day
from grant date. Employee options generally vest in equal annual installments on the first, second, third and fourth
anniversaries of the grant date and generally have 30 or 90 days after the service relationship ends, or one year
after death, to exercise all vested options. The fair value of each option grant is separately estimated for each
vesting date. The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis
between the grant date for the award and each vesting date.

In addition to the 2011 Plan, on December 15, 2010, the Company adopted the 2011 Director Compensation
Program (the “2011 Program”), which stated that non-employee directors would receive their compensation in
awards of restricted stock units under the 2011 Plan. Under the 2011 Program, restricted stock units are granted
the first day of each calendar quarter. The number of restricted stock units granted each quarter is determined by
dividing one-fourth of the amount of the annual retainer by the fair market value of the shares of common stock as

1
0
-
K

of the grant date. The restricted stock units are fully vested on the date they are issued and are paid in shares of the
Company’s common stock subsequent to the non-employee director ceasing to be a member of the Board.

The 2011 Program replaced the 2003 Comp Plan and the 2003 Option Plan. Under the 2003 Comp Plan, non-
employee directors could receive no more than one-half of their director fees immediately in cash, and the
remainder of the fees was required to be taken in common stock or stock appreciation rights. The director had the
option to elect to receive up to 100% of the fees in stock or defer all or part of the fees in units with value
equivalent to the value of shares of common stock as of the grant date. At August 25, 2018, the Company had
$13.6 million accrued related to 17,710 outstanding units issued under the 2003 Comp Plan and prior plans, and
there was $9.5 million accrued related to 17,990 outstanding units issued as of August 26, 2017. No additional
shares of stock or units will be issued in future years under the 2003 Comp Plan.

Under the 2003 Option Plan, each non-employee director received an option grant on January 1 of each year, and
each new non-employee director received an option to purchase 3,000 shares upon election to the Board, plus a
portion of the annual directors’ option grant prorated for the portion of the year actually served. These stock
option grants were made at the fair market value as of the grant date and generally vested three years from the
grant date. There were 13,000 and 19,000 outstanding options under the 2003 Option Plan as of August 25, 2018
and August 26, 2017, respectively. No additional shares of stock will be issued in future years under the 2003
Option Plan.

During fiscal 2014, the Company adopted the 2014 Director Compensation Program (the “Program”), which
states that non-employee directors will receive their compensation in awards of restricted stock units under the
2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan, with an option for a certain portion of a director’s compensation to be paid in
cash at the non-employee director’s election. The Program replaced the 2011 Director Compensation Program.
Under the Program, restricted stock units are granted January 1 of each year (the “Grant Date”). The number of
restricted stock units is determined by dividing the amount of the annual retainer by the fair market value of the
shares of common stock as of the Grant Date. The restricted stock units are fully vested on January 1 of each year
and are paid in shares of the Company’s common stock on the fifth anniversary of the Grant Date or the date the
non-employee director ceases to be a member of the Board (“Separation from Service”), whichever occurs first.
Non-employee directors may elect to defer receipt of the restricted stock units until their Separation from Service.
The cash portion of the award, if elected, is paid ratably over the remaining calendar quarters.

The Company has estimated the fair value of all stock option awards as of the date of the grant by applying the
Black-Scholes-Merton multiple-option pricing valuation model. The application of this valuation model involves
assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense. The
following table presents the weighted average for key assumptions used in determining the fair value of options
granted and the related share-based compensation expense:

August 25,
2018

Year Ended
August 26,
2017

August 27,
2016

Expected price volatility ................................................
Risk-free interest rates ...................................................
Weighted average expected lives (in years) ...................
Forfeiture rate ................................................................
Dividend yield................................................................

20%
1.9%
5.1
10%
0%

18%
1.2%
5.1
10%
0%

18%
1.5%
5.1
10%
0%

The following methodologies were applied in developing the assumptions used in determining the fair value of
options granted:

Expected price volatility – This is a measure of the amount by which a price has fluctuated or is expected to
fluctuate. The Company uses actual historical changes in the market value of its stock to calculate the
volatility assumption as it is management’s belief that this is the best indicator of future volatility. The
Company calculates daily market value changes from the date of grant over a past period representative of the
expected life of the options to determine volatility. An increase in the expected volatility will increase
compensation expense.

Risk-free interest rate – This is the U.S. Treasury rate for the week of the grant having a term equal to the
expected life of the option. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense.

Expected lives – This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding
and is based on historical experience. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise
behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Options granted have a maximum term of ten
years or ten years and one day. An increase in the expected life will increase compensation expense.

Forfeiture rate – This is the estimated percentage of options granted that are expected to be forfeited or
canceled before becoming fully vested. This estimate is based on historical experience at the time of
valuation and reduces expense ratably over the vesting period. An increase in the forfeiture rate will decrease
compensation expense. This estimate is evaluated periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures
differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.

Dividend yield – The Company has not made any dividend payments nor does it have plans to pay dividends
in the foreseeable future. An increase in the dividend yield will decrease compensation expense.

The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options granted was $129.12 during fiscal 2018, $139.80
during fiscal 2017, and $156.20 during fiscal 2016. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $123.1 million in
fiscal 2018, $93.9 million in fiscal 2017, and $178.0 million in fiscal 2016. The total fair value of options vested
was $35.7 million in fiscal 2018, $34.7 million in fiscal 2017, and $32.2 million in fiscal 2016.

The Company generally issues new shares when options are exercised. The following table summarizes
information about stock option activity for the year ended August 25, 2018:

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

493.18
587.57
298.02
672.61
534.74

446.07
664.77

Number
of Shares

1,798,055
284,335
(297,616)
(77,908)
1,706,866

1,014,819
622,842
686,577

Outstanding – August 26, 2017...
Granted .......................................
Exercised .....................................
Cancelled ....................................
Outstanding – August 25, 2018...

Exercisable ..................................
Expected to vest ..........................
Available for future grants ..........

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)

6.06

4.73
8.02

402,631

329,352
38,387

The Company recognized $2.1 million in expense related to the discount on the selling of shares to employees and
executives under various share purchase plans in fiscal 2018, $1.8 million in fiscal 2017 and $2.0 million in fiscal
2016. The Sixth Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Employee Plan”),
which is qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, permits all eligible employees to purchase
AutoZone’s common stock at 85% of the lower of the market price of the common stock on the first day or last
day of each calendar quarter through payroll deductions. Maximum permitted annual purchases are $15,000 per

1
0
-
K

employee or 10 percent of compensation, whichever is less. Under the Employee Plan, 14,523 shares were sold to
employees in fiscal 2018, 14,205 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2017, and 12,662 shares were sold to
employees in fiscal 2016. The Company repurchased 11,816 shares at market value in fiscal 2018, 12,455 shares
in fiscal 2017 and 12,460 shares in fiscal 2016 from employees electing to sell their stock. Issuances of shares
under the Employee Plan are netted against repurchases and such repurchases are not included in share
repurchases disclosed in “Note K – Stock Repurchase Program.” At August 25, 2018, 163,777 shares of common
stock were reserved for future issuance under the Employee Plan.

Once executives have reached the maximum purchases under the Employee Plan, the Fifth Amended and Restated
Executive Stock Purchase Plan (the “Executive Plan”) permits all eligible executives to purchase AutoZone’s
common stock up to 25 percent of his or her annual salary and bonus. Purchases under the Executive Plan were
1,840 shares in fiscal 2018, 1,865 shares in fiscal 2017 and 1,943 shares in fiscal 2016. At August 25, 2018,
238,048 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under the Executive Plan.

Note C – Accrued Expenses and Other

Accrued expenses and other consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

1
0
-
K

Accrued compensation, related payroll taxes and benefits ........................
Property, sales, and other taxes ..................................................................
Medical and casualty insurance claims (current portion) ...........................
Capital lease obligations ............................................................................
Accrued interest .........................................................................................
Accrued gift cards ......................................................................................
Accrued sales and warranty returns ...........................................................
Other ..........................................................................................................

August 25,
2018

August 26,

2017

$ 195,004
106,050
88,761
52,290
36,902
27,401
20,025
80,461
$ 606,894

$ 181,591
98,829
84,756
48,134
41,047
24,192
19,520
65,281
$ 563,350

The Company retains a significant portion of the insurance risks associated with workers’ compensation,
employee health, general, products liability, property and vehicle insurance. A portion of these self-insured losses
is managed through a wholly owned insurance captive. The Company maintains certain levels for stop-loss
coverage for each self-insured plan in order to limit its liability for large claims. The retained limits are per claim
and are $2.0 million for workers’ compensation, $3.0 million for vehicles, $21.5 million for property, $0.7 million
for employee health, and $1.0 million for general and products liability.

Note D – Income Taxes

The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes are as follows:

(in thousands)

Domestic ..........................................................................
International .....................................................................

August 25,
2018

Year Ended
August 26,
2017

August 27,
2016

$ 1,412,963
223,366
$ 1,636,329

$ 1,737,401
188,088
$ 1,925,489

$ 1,737,727
174,987
$ 1,912,714

The provision for income tax expense consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

Current:

August 25,
2018

Year Ended
August 26,
2017

August 27,
2016

Federal .........................................................................
State .............................................................................
International .................................................................

$ 328,963
36,389
57,702
423,054

$ 487,492
31,733
50,493
569,718

$ 534,621
39,223
52,844
626,688

Deferred:

Income tax expense .........................................................

(131,926)
8,167
(502)
(124,261)
$ 298,793

72,208
7,769
(5,075)
74,902
$ 644,620

48,509
9,453
(12,943)
45,019
$ 671,707

A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the amount computed by applying the federal statutory tax
rate to income before income taxes is as follows:

(in thousands)

Federal tax at statutory U.S. income tax rate ..................
State income taxes, net ....................................................
Transition tax ..................................................................
Share-based compensation ..............................................
Impact of tax reform .......................................................
Other ...............................................................................
Effective tax rate .............................................................

1
0
-
K

August 25,
2018

25.9%
1.9%
1.6%
(1.6%)
(9.6%)
0.1%
18.3%

Year Ended
August 26,
2017

35.0%
1.3%
–
(1.4%)
–
(1.4%)
33.5%

August 27,
2016

35.0%
1.6%
–
–
–
(1.5%)
35.1%

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform”) was enacted into law. Tax Reform
significantly revises the U.S. federal corporate income tax by, among other things, lowering the statutory federal
corporate rate from 35% to 21%, eliminating certain deductions, imposing a mandatory one-time transition tax on
accumulated earnings of foreign subsidiaries, and changing how foreign earnings are subject to U.S. federal tax.

As a result of the decrease in the federal tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018, the Company has
computed its income tax expense for the year ended August 25, 2018 using a blended federal tax rate of 25.9%,
which provided a benefit of $119.2 million on fiscal 2018 earnings before taxes. The Company’s federal statutory
tax rate will be 21% for the year ending August 31, 2019 and each subsequent year.

For the year ended August 25, 2018 and August 26, 2017, the Company recognized excess tax benefits from stock
option exercises of $31.3 million and $31.2 million, respectively.

The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of GAAP in
situations where a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including
computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of Tax Reform. To
the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of Tax Reform is incomplete but it is able to
determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. If a company
cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply
ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of
Tax Reform. The ultimate impact may differ from provisional amounts recorded, possibly materially, due to,
among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made, and
additional regulatory guidance that may be issued. The accounting must be completed within one year from the
enactment date of Tax Reform.

1
0
-
K

As a result of the statutory rate changes of Tax Reform, the Company must remeasure its deferred tax assets and
liabilities using the federal tax rate that will apply when the related temporary differences are expected to reverse.
During the year ended August 25, 2018, the Company recorded a provisional tax benefit of $157.3 million related
to the remeasurement of deferred taxes as a result of Tax Reform. The Company is continuing to analyze certain
aspects of Tax Reform and is refining its calculations which could potentially affect the measurement of these
balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts.

As part of the transition to the new territorial tax system, Tax Reform imposes a one-time transition tax on
deemed repatriation of historical earnings of foreign subsidiaries. For the year ended August 25, 2018, the
Company recorded a provisional tax expense of $25.8 million related to the transition tax. Our analysis of the
transition tax is not completed as of the year ended August 25, 2018, as the Company continues to finalize the
calculation of foreign earnings and profits and the amounts held in cash or other specified assets. The provisional
amount may also change as new guidance and clarifications are issued by the US federal and state jurisdictions.
The Company will complete the accounting for these items during the measurement period. The Company intends
to file an election to pay the transition tax liability over the following eight years as prescribed under the enacted
law.

The other provisions of Tax Reform are either immaterial or not applicable for the year ended August 25, 2018.
The provisions applicable for the year ended August 25, 2018, including the deductibility of certain expenditures,
are provisional amounts that may also change as new guidance and clarifications are issued.

Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:

(in thousands)

Deferred tax assets:

Net operating loss and credit carryforwards ...........................................
Accrued benefits .....................................................................................
Other .......................................................................................................
Total deferred tax assets ......................................................................
Less: Valuation allowances ........................................................................
Net deferred tax assets .................................................................................
Deferred tax liabilities:

Property and equipment ..........................................................................
Inventory .................................................................................................
Prepaid expenses .....................................................................................
Other .......................................................................................................
Total deferred tax liabilities ................................................................
Net deferred tax liabilities ...........................................................................

August 25,
2018

August 26,

2017

47,190
62,867
46,375
156,432
(19,619)
136,813

(101,049)
(242,138)
(42,019)
(2,191)
(387,397)
$ (250,584)

48,062
96,664
56,052
200,778
(13,501)
187,277

(117,580)
(333,422)
(60,920)
(11,158)
(523,080)
$ (335,803)

The Company has historically asserted its intention to indefinitely reinvest foreign current and accumulated
earnings and other basis differences in certain foreign subsidiaries. During the year ended August 25, 2018, the
Company has reevaluated its assertion as a result of the enactment of Tax Reform and, with few exceptions, no
longer considers the current and accumulated earnings to be indefinitely reinvested in our foreign subsidiaries.
Where necessary, withholding tax provisions resulting from foreign distributions of current and accumulated
earnings have been considered in the Company’s provision for income taxes.

The Company maintains its assertion related to other basis differences in foreign subsidiaries. It is impracticable
for the Company to determine the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability on these indefinitely reinvested
basis differences.

At August 25, 2018 and August 26, 2017, the Company had deferred tax assets of $30.9 million and $30.8
million, respectively, from net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income
totaling approximately $219.1 million and $198.2 million, respectively. Certain NOLs have no expiration date and
others will expire, if not utilized, in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2038. At August 25, 2018 and August
26, 2017, the Company had deferred tax assets for income tax credit carryforwards of $16.3 million and $17.2
million, respectively. Income tax credit carryforwards will expire, if not utilized, in various years from fiscal 2023
through 2028.

At August 25, 2018 and August 26, 2017, the Company had a valuation allowance of $19.6 million and $13.5
million, respectively, on deferred tax assets associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards for which
management has determined it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Management
believes it is more likely than not that the remaining deferred tax assets will be fully realized.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

(in thousands)

Beginning balance ......................................................................................
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year ..................
Additions for tax positions of prior years ...............................................
Reductions for tax positions of prior years .............................................
Reductions due to settlements.................................................................
Reductions due to statute of limitations ..................................................
Ending balance ...........................................................................................

August 25,
2018

August 26,

2017

22,201
8,184
1,404
(482)
(1,930)
(3,300)
26,077

27,726
7,089
278
(6,954)
(1,964)
(3,974)
22,201

Included in the August 25, 2018 and the August 26, 2017 balances are $13.5 million and $9.9 million,
respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate.

The Company accrues interest on unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Penalties, if
incurred, would be recognized as a component of income tax expense. The Company had $0.7 million and $1.2
million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits at August 25,
2018 and August 26, 2017, respectively.

The Company files U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and international income tax returns. With few exceptions,
the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, or Non-U.S. examinations by tax
authorities for fiscal year 2013 and prior. The Company is typically engaged in various tax examinations at any
given time by U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and Non-U.S. taxing jurisdictions. As of August 25, 2018, the
Company estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by approximately $1.1 million
over the next twelve months as a result of tax audit settlements. While the Company believes that it is adequately
accrued for possible audit adjustments, the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this
time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates.

Note E – Fair Value Measurements

The Company defines fair value as the price received to transfer an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, the Company uses the fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to
measure fair value. The hierarchy, as defined below, gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of
the fair value hierarchy are set forth below:

Level 1 inputs — unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
Company can access at the measurement date.

Level 2 inputs — inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable, either
directly or indirectly, for the asset or liability.

1
0
-
K

Level 3 inputs — unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are based on the Company’s own
assumptions as there is little, if any, observable activity in identical assets or liabilities.

Financial Assets & Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

(in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair Value

August 25, 2018

Other current assets .................................
Other long-term assets ............................

$ 55,711
58,973
$ 114,684

3,733
16,259
19,992

–
–
–

59,444
75,232
$ 134,676

(in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair Value

August 26, 2017

Other current assets .................................
Other long-term assets ............................

$ 18,453
53,319
$ 71,772

120
28,981
29,101

–
–
–

18,573
82,300
$ 100,873

1
0
-
K

At August 25, 2018, the fair value measurement amounts for assets and liabilities recorded in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheet consisted of short-term marketable securities of $59.4 million, which are included
within Other current assets and long-term marketable securities of $75.2 million, which are included in Other
long-term assets. The Company’s marketable securities are typically valued at the closing price in the principal
active market as of the last business day of the quarter or through the use of other market inputs relating to the
securities, including benchmark yields and reported trades.

A discussion on how the Company’s cash flow hedges are valued is included in “Note H – Derivative Financial
Instruments,” while the fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets are disclosed in “Note L – Pension and
Savings Plans.”

Non-Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Certain non-financial assets and liabilities are required to be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in
certain circumstances, including the event of impairment. These non-financial assets and liabilities could include
assets and liabilities acquired in an acquisition as well as goodwill, intangible assets and property, plant and
equipment that are determined to be impaired. At August 25, 2018, the Company did not have any other
significant non-financial assets or liabilities that had been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis
subsequent to initial recognition.

Financial Instruments not Recognized at Fair Value
The Company has financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current
assets and accounts payable. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate fair value because
of their short maturities. A discussion of the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s debt is included in
“Note I – Financing.”

Note F – Marketable Securities

The Company’s basis for determining the cost of a security sold is the “Specific Identification Model.” Unrealized
gains (losses) on marketable securities are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. The Company’s
available-for-sale marketable securities consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

August 25, 2018

Amortized
Cost
Basis

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

Fair
Value

Corporate securities ..................................
Government bonds ....................................
Mortgage-backed securities ......................
Asset-backed securities and other .............

50,306
28,777
3,248
53,445
$ 135,776

–
–
–
–
–

(684)
(173)
(90)
(153)
(1,100)

49,622
28,604
3,158
53,292
$ 134,676

(in thousands)

Corporate securities .................................
Government bonds ...................................
Mortgage-backed securities .....................
Asset-backed securities and other ............

August 26, 2017

Amortized
Cost
Basis

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

39,917
31,076
4,850
25,042
$ 100,885

73
49
2
28
152

(13)
(74)
(42)
(35)
(164)

Fair
Value

$ 39,977
31,051
4,810
25,035
$ 100,873

The debt securities held at August 25, 2018, had effective maturities ranging from less than one year to
approximately three years. The Company did not realize any material gains or losses on its marketable securities
during fiscal 2018, 2017 or 2016.

The Company holds 121 securities that are in an unrealized loss position of approximately $1.1 million at August
25, 2018. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until recovery of fair value or
maturity, and does not deem the investments to be impaired on an other than temporary basis. In evaluating
whether the securities are deemed to be impaired on an other than temporary basis, the Company considers factors
such as the duration and severity of the loss position, the credit worthiness of the investee, the term to maturity
and its intent and ability to hold the investments until maturity or until recovery of fair value.

Included above in total marketable securities are $85.6 million and $85.4 million of marketable securities
transferred by the Company’s insurance captive to a trust account to secure its obligations to an insurance
company related to future workers’ compensation and casualty losses as of August 25, 2018 and August 26, 2017,
respectively.

1
0
-
K

Note G – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Accumulated other comprehensive loss includes certain adjustments to pension liabilities, foreign currency
translation adjustments, certain activity for interest rate swaps and treasury rate locks that qualify as cash flow
hedges and unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities. Changes in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

Pension
Liability

Foreign
Currency(4)

Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Securities

Derivatives

Total

Balance at August 27, 2016…………
Other comprehensive income (loss)

before reclassifications…………..

Amounts reclassified from

Accumulated other comprehensive
loss(1) ………………………….
Balance at August 26, 2017…………
Other comprehensive income (loss)

before reclassifications…………..

Amounts reclassified from

Accumulated other comprehensive
loss(1) ………………………….

Adoption of ASU 2018-
02(2)…………………
Balance at August 25, 2018…………

$ (88,890)

$ (211,012)

120

$ (7,747)

$ (307,529)

8,046

35,198

(60)

–

43,184

8,468(3)
(72,376)

–
(175,814)

(71)(5)

(11)

1,391(6)
(6,356)

9,788
(254,557)

77,774

(53,085)

(800)

–

23,889

7,724(3)

–

(62)(5)

1,690(6)

9,352

(13,122)
–

–
$ (228,899)

–
$ (873)

(1,367)
$ (6,033)

(14,489)
$ (235,805)

1
0
-
K

(1) Amounts in parentheses indicate debits to Accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL).
(2) Represents the tax effects from deferred tax items reclassified from AOCL to retained earnings related to the adoption of

ASU 2018-02.

(3) The amounts reclassified from AOCL associated with our pension plans have been reclassified to Operating, selling,

general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income as a result of the termination of the plans.
See “Note L – Pension and Savings Plans” for further discussion.

(4) Foreign currency is shown net of U.S. tax to account for foreign currency impacts of certain undistributed non-U.S.

subsidiaries earnings. Other foreign currency is not shown net of additional U.S. tax as other basis differences of non-U.S.
subsidiaries are intended to be permanently reinvested.

(5) Represents realized losses on marketable securities, net of taxes of $234 in fiscal 2018 and $38 in fiscal 2017, which is

recorded in Operating, selling, general, and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. See “Note
F – Marketable Securities” for further discussion.

(6) Represents gains and losses on derivatives, net of taxes of $515 in fiscal 2018 and $814 in fiscal 2017, which is recorded in
Interest expense, net, on the Consolidated Statements of Income. See “Note H – Derivative Financial Instruments” for
further discussion.

Note H – Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company periodically uses derivatives to hedge exposures to interest rates. The Company does not hold or
issue financial instruments for trading purposes. For transactions that meet the hedge accounting criteria, the
Company formally designates and documents the instrument as a hedge at inception and quarterly thereafter
assesses the hedges to ensure they are effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the underlying
exposures. Derivatives are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value, determined using
available market information or other appropriate valuation methodologies. In accordance with ASC Topic 815,
Derivatives and Hedging, the effective portion of a financial instrument’s change in fair value is recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive loss for derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges and any ineffective
portion of an instrument’s change in fair value is recognized in earnings.

At August 25, 2018, the Company had $7.9 million recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to
net realized losses associated with terminated interest rate swap and treasury rate lock derivatives which were
designated as hedging instruments. Net losses are amortized into Interest expense over the remaining life of the

associated debt. During the fiscal 2018 and 2017, the Company reclassified $2.2 million of net losses from
Accumulated other comprehensive loss to Interest expense and expects the same level of expense in fiscal 2019.

Note I – Financing

The Company’s debt consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

7.125% Senior Notes due August 2018, effective interest rate of 7.28% ..........
1.625% Senior Notes due April 2019, effective interest rate of 1.77% .............
4.000% Senior Notes due November 2020, effective interest rate of 4.43% .....
2.500% Senior Notes due April 2021, effective interest rate of 2.62% .............
3.700% Senior Notes due April 2022, effective interest rate of 3.85% .............
2.875% Senior Notes due January 2023, effective interest rate of 3.21% .........
3.125% Senior Notes due July 2023, effective interest rate of 3.26% ...............
3.250% Senior Notes due April 2025, effective interest rate 3.36%..................
3.125% Senior Notes due April 2026, effective interest rate of 3.28% .............
3.750% Senior Notes due June 2027, effective interest rate of 3.83% ..............
Commercial paper, weighted average interest rate of 2.29% and 1.44% at

August 25, 2018 and August 26, 2017, respectively ...................................
Total debt before discounts and debt issuance costs ..........................................
Less: Discounts and debt issuance costs ......................................................
Long-term debt ..................................................................................................

August 25,
2018

August 26,
2017

$ –
250,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
300,000
500,000
400,000
400,000
600,000

1,325,300
5,025,300
19,370
$ 5,005,930

250,000
250,000
500,000
250,000
500,000
300,000
500,000
400,000
400,000
600,000

1,155,100
5,105,100
23,862
$ 5,081,238

As of August 25, 2018, the commercial paper borrowings and the $250 million 1.625% Senior Notes due April
2019 are classified as long-term in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as the Company has the ability
and intent to refinance on a long-term basis through available capacity in its revolving credit facilities. As of
August 25, 2018, the Company had $1.997 billion of availability under its $2.0 billion revolving credit facilities,
which would allow it to replace these short-term obligations with long-term financing facilities.

The Company entered into a Master Extension, New Commitment and Amendment Agreement dated as of
November 18, 2017 (the “Extension Amendment”) to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated
as of November 18, 2016, as amended, modified, extended or restated from time to time (the “Revolving Credit
Agreement”). Under the Extension Amendment: (i) the Company’s borrowing capacity under the Revolving
Credit Agreement was increased from $1.6 billion to $2.0 billion; (ii) the Company’s option to increase its
borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Agreement was “refreshed” and the amount of such option
remained at $400 million; the maximum borrowing under the Revolving Credit Agreement may, at the
Company’s option, subject to lenders approval, be increased from $2.0 billion to $2.4 billion; (iii) the termination
date of the Revolving Credit Agreement was extended from November 18, 2021 until November 18, 2022; and
(iv) the Company has the option to make one additional written request of the lenders to extend the termination
date then in effect for an additional year. Under the Revolving Credit Agreement, the Company may borrow funds
consisting of Eurodollar loans, base rate loans or a combination of both. Interest accrues on Eurodollar loans at a
defined Eurodollar rate, defined as LIBOR plus the applicable percentage, as defined in the Revolving Credit
Agreement, depending upon the Company’s senior, unsecured, (non-credit enhanced) long-term debt ratings.
Interest accrues on base rate loans as defined in the Revolving Credit Agreement. As of August 25, 2018, the
Company had $3.3 million of outstanding letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Agreement.

1
0
-
K

The Revolving Credit Agreement requires that the Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio as of the last
day of each quarter shall be no less than 2.5:1. This ratio is defined as the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before
interest, taxes and rents to (ii) consolidated interest expense plus consolidated rents. The Company’s consolidated
interest coverage ratio as of August 25, 2018 was 5.8:1.

As of August 25, 2018, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under each of the revolving credit facilities,
and $3.3 million of outstanding letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Agreement.

The Company also maintains a letter of credit facility that allows it to request the participating bank to issue
letters of credit on its behalf up to an aggregate amount of $75 million. The letter of credit facility is in addition to
the letters of credit that may be issued under the Revolving Credit Agreement. As of August 25, 2018, the
Company had $71.0 million in letters of credit outstanding under the letter of credit facility.

In addition to the outstanding letters of credit issued under the committed facilities discussed above, the Company
had $32.5 million in letters of credit outstanding as of August 25, 2018. These letters of credit have various
maturity dates and were issued on an uncommitted basis.

On April 18, 2017, the Company issued $600 million in 3.750% Senior Notes due June 2027 under its shelf
registration statement filed with the SEC on April 15, 2015 (the “2015 Shelf Registration”). The 2015 Shelf
Registration allowed the Company to sell an indeterminate amount in debt securities to fund general corporate
purposes, including repaying, redeeming or repurchasing outstanding debt and for working capital, capital
expenditures, new location openings, stock repurchases and acquisitions. Proceeds from the debt issuance were
used for general corporate purposes.

On April 21, 2016, the Company issued $400 million in 3.125% Senior Notes due April 2026 and $250 million in
1.625% Senior Notes due April 2019 under its 2015 Shelf Registration. Proceeds from the debt issuances were
used for general corporate purposes.

All senior notes are subject to an interest rate adjustment if the debt ratings assigned to the senior notes are
downgraded (as defined in the agreements). Further, the senior notes contain a provision that repayment of the
senior notes may be accelerated if the Company experiences a change in control (as defined in the agreements).
The Company’s borrowings under its senior notes contain minimal covenants, primarily restrictions on liens.
Under its revolving credit facilities, covenants include restrictions on liens, a maximum debt to earnings ratio, a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a change of control provision that may require acceleration of the
repayment obligations under certain circumstances. All of the repayment obligations under its borrowing
arrangements may be accelerated and come due prior to the scheduled payment date if covenants are breached or
an event of default occurs.

1
0
-
K

As of August 25, 2018, the Company was in compliance with all covenants related to its borrowing arrangements.
All of the Company’s debt is unsecured. Scheduled maturities of debt are as follows:

(in thousands)

2019 .......................................................................................................................................
2020 .......................................................................................................................................
2021 .......................................................................................................................................
2022 .......................................................................................................................................
2023 .......................................................................................................................................
Thereafter ...............................................................................................................................
Subtotal ..........................................................................................................................
Discount and debt issuance costs ...........................................................................................
Total Debt

Scheduled
Maturities

$ 1,575,300
–
750,000
500,000
800,000
1,400,000
5,025,300
19,370
$ 5,005,930

The fair value of the Company’s debt was estimated at $4.948 billion as of August 25, 2018, and $5.171 billion as
of August 26, 2017, based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates
available to the Company for debt of the same terms (Level 2). Such fair value is less than the carrying value of
debt by $57.5 million at August 25, 2018, which reflects face amount, adjusted for any unamortized debt issuance
costs and discounts. At August 26, 2017, the fair value was greater than the carrying value of debt by $90.3
million.

Note J – Interest Expense

Net interest expense consisted of the following:

1
0
-
K

(in thousands)

Interest expense .............................................................
Interest income ..............................................................
Capitalized interest .......................................................

Note K – Stock Repurchase Program

August 25,
2018

$ 181,668
(5,636)
(1,505)
$ 174,527

Year Ended
August 26,
2017

$ 159,329
(3,502)
(1,247)
$ 154,580

August 27,
2016

$ 150,961
(2,371)
(909)
$ 147,681

During 1998, the Company announced a program permitting the Company to repurchase a portion of its
outstanding shares not to exceed a dollar maximum established by the Board. The program was amended on
March 20, 2018 to increase the repurchase authorization to $19.65 billion from $18.65 billion. From January 1998
to August 25, 2018, the Company has repurchased a total of 144.7 million shares at an aggregate cost of $19.418
billion.

The Company’s share repurchase activity consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

August 25,
2018

Year Ended
August 26,
2017

August 27,
2016

Amount ..........................................................................
Shares .............................................................................

$ 1,592,013
2,398

$ 1,071,649
1,495

$ 1,452,462
1,903

During fiscal year 2018, the Company retired 1.5 million shares of treasury stock which had previously been
repurchased under the Company’s share repurchase program. The retirement increased Retained deficit by $918.5
million and decreased Additional paid-in capital by $60.5 million. During the comparable prior year period, the
Company retired 1.8 million shares of treasury stock, which increased Retained deficit by $1.321 billion and
decreased Additional paid-in capital by $64.9 million.

On September 26, 2018, the Board voted to increase the authorization by $1.25 billion. This brings the total value
of the shares authorized to $20.9 billion. Subsequent to August 25, 2018, the Company has repurchased 346,979
shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $263.4 million. Considering the cumulative repurchases and the
increase in authorization subsequent to August 25, 2018, the Company has $1.22 billion remaining under the
Board’s authorization to repurchase its common stock.

Note L – Pension and Savings Plans

Prior to January 1, 2003, substantially all full-time employees were covered by a defined benefit pension plan.
The benefits under the plan were based on years of service and the employee’s highest consecutive five-year
average compensation. On January 1, 2003, the plan was frozen, resulting in pension plan participants earning no
new benefits under the plan formula and no new participants joining the pension plan.

On January 1, 2003, the Company’s supplemental defined benefit pension plan for certain highly compensated
employees was also frozen, resulting in pension plan participants earning no new benefits under the plan formula
and no new participants joining the pension plan.

On December 19, 2017, the Board of Directors approved a resolution to terminate both of the Company’s pension
plans, effective March 15, 2018. The Company offered plan participants the option to receive an annuity
purchased from an insurance carrier or a lump-sum cash payment based on a number of factors. During the fourth
quarter of 2018, the Company contributed $11.4 million to the pension plans to ensure that sufficient assets were
available for the lump-sum payments and annuity purchases, completed the transfer of all lump sum payments,
transferred all remaining benefit obligations related to the pension plans to a highly rated insurance company, and
recognized $130.3 million of non-cash pension termination charges in Operating, selling, general and
administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company will no longer have any
remaining defined pension benefit obligation and thus no periodic pension benefit expense.

1
0
-
K

The following table sets forth the plans’ funded status and amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated
Balance Sheets:

(in thousands)

Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year .....................................
Interest cost ...............................................................................................
Actuarial (gains) losses .............................................................................
Annuities purchased ..................................................................................
Benefits and settlements paid ...................................................................
Benefit obligations at end of year ............................................................

Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year ...........................................
Actual return on plan assets ......................................................................
Employer contributions .............................................................................
Annuities purchased ..................................................................................
Benefits and settlements paid ...................................................................
Asset reversion upon termination .............................................................
Fair value of plan assets at end of year .....................................................

August 25,
2018

August 26,
2017

$ 314,724
10,356
(676)
(157,589)
(166,815)
–

$ 316,267
(3,428)
11,596
(157,589)
(166,815)
(31)
–

$ 328,511
10,335
(8,746)
–
(15,376)
$ 314,724

$ 289,386
24,496
17,761
–
(15,376)
–
$ 316,267

Amount Recognized in the Statement of Financial Position:
Current liabilities ......................................................................................
Long-term assets .......................................................................................
Long-term liabilities..................................................................................
Net amount recognized .............................................................................

–
–
–
–

(283)
8,686
(6,860)
$ 1,543

Amount Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
and not yet reflected in Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
Net actuarial loss .......................................................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ....................................................

$
$

–
–

$ (118,889)
$ (118,889)

Net periodic benefit expense consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

August 25,
2018

Year Ended
August 26,
2017

Interest cost ....................................................................
Expected return on plan assets .......................................
Recognized net actuarial losses ......................................
Settlement loss ...............................................................
Net periodic benefit expense ..........................................

10,356
(18,997)
10,736
130,263
$ 132,358

10,335
(20,056)
13,873
–
4,152

August 27,
2016

$ 11,272
(16,512)
10,506
–
5,266

The blended actuarial assumptions used in determining the projected benefit obligation include the following:

August 25,
2018

Year Ended
August 26,
2017

August 27,
2016

Discount rate to determine benefit obligation ................
Discount rate to determine net interest cost ...................
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets ...........

3.86%
3.36%
6.00%

3.86%
3.21%
7.00%

3.72%
3.90%
7.00%

1
0
-
K

The Company has a 401(k) plan that covers all domestic employees who meet the plan’s participation
requirements. The plan features include Company matching contributions, immediate 100% vesting of Company
contributions and a savings option up to 25% of qualified earnings. The Company makes matching contributions,
per pay period, up to a specified percentage of employees’ contributions as approved by the Board. The Company
made matching contributions to employee accounts in connection with the 401(k) plan of $23.1 million in fiscal
2018, $21.0 million in fiscal 2017, and $19.7 million in fiscal 2016.

Note M – Sale of Assets

During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company determined that the approximate fair value less costs to
sell its IMC and AutoAnything businesses was significantly lower than the carrying value of the net assets based
on recent offers received and recorded impairment charges totaling $193.2 million within Operating, selling,
general and administrative expenses in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Company recorded an impairment charge of $93.6 million for its IMC business, which is reflected as a
component of Auto Parts Locations in its segment reporting. Impairment charges for AutoAnything, which is
reflected as a component of the Other category in the Company’s segment reporting, totaled $99.6 million.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company completed the IMC and AutoAnything transactions for total
consideration that approximated the remaining net book value at the closing date.

Note N – Goodwill and Intangibles

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:

(in thousands)

Net balance as of August 27, 2016 ........................
Goodwill added through acquisition .................
Goodwill adjustments .......................................
Net balance as of August 26, 2017 ........................
Goodwill added through acquisition .................
Goodwill adjustments .......................................
Net balance as of August 25, 2018 ........................

Auto Parts
Locations

326,703
–
–
326,703
–
(24,058)
302,645

Other

Total

65,184
–
–
65,184
–
(65,184)
–

391,887
–
–
391,887
–
(89,242)
302,645

During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company recorded impairment charges related to its IMC and
AutoAnything businesses as the Company determined that the approximate fair value less costs to sell the
businesses was significantly lower than the carrying value of the net assets. The impairment charge for the IMC
business is reflected as a component of Auto Parts Locations, and the impairment charge for AutoAnything is
reflected as a component of the Other category in our segment reporting. See “Note M – Sale of Assets” for
further discussion.

1
0
-
K

The Company performs its annual goodwill and intangibles impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal
year. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company concluded its remaining goodwill was not impaired. In the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company concluded that its goodwill was not impaired. Total accumulated
goodwill impairment as of August 25, 2018 is $107.5 million compared to $18.3 million as of August 26, 2017.

The carrying amounts of intangible assets are included in Other long-term assets as follows:

August 25, 2018

(in thousands)

Estimated
Useful
Life

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Carrying
Amount

Amortizing intangible assets:

Technology ....................................
Customer relationships ....................

3-5 years
3-10 years

Total intangible assets other than goodwill

870
29,376
$ 30,246

(870)
(19,587)
(20,457)

August 26, 2017

$ –
9,789
9,789

9,789

(in thousands)

Amortizing intangible assets:

Estimated
Useful
Life

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Carrying
Amount

Technology ....................................
Noncompete agreements ..................
Customer relationships ....................

3-5 years
5 years
3-10 years

$ 10,570
1,300
49,676
$ 61,546

(9,994)
(1,223)
(24,730)
(35,947)

Non-amortizing intangible asset:

Trade names .....................................

Total intangible assets other than goodwill

$ 576
77
24,946
25,599

26,900

52,499

During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company recorded $26.9 million of impairment charges related to
AutoAnything’s and IMC’s trade names as the Company determined that the approximate fair value less costs to
sell the businesses was significantly lower than the carrying value of the net assets. See “Note M – Sale of Assets”
for further discussion. Trade names at August 25, 2018 and August 26, 2017 reflect a total accumulated
impairment of $31.0 million and $4.1 million, respectively.

Amortization expense of intangible assets for the years ended August 25, 2018 and August 26, 2017 was $5.1
million and $8.5 million, respectively.

Total future amortization expense for intangible assets that have finite lives, based on the existing intangible
assets and their current estimated useful lives as of August 25, 2018, is estimated as follows:

(in thousands)

2019 ........................................................................................................................................
2020 .........................................................................................................................................
2021 .........................................................................................................................................
Thereafter ................................................................................................................................

Total

4,173
4,173
1,443
–
9,789

Note O – Leases

The Company leases some of its retail stores, distribution centers, facilities, land and equipment, including
vehicles. Other than vehicle leases, most of the leases are operating leases, which include renewal options made at
the Company’s election and provisions for percentage rent based on sales. Rental expense was $315.6 million in
fiscal 2018, $302.9 million in fiscal 2017, and $280.5 million in fiscal 2016. Percentage rentals were insignificant.

1
0
-
K

The Company records rent for all operating leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including any
reasonably assured renewal periods and the period of time prior to the lease term that the Company is in
possession of the leased space for the purpose of installing leasehold improvements. Differences between
recorded rent expense and cash payments are recorded as a liability in Accrued expenses and other and Other
long-term liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, based on the terms of the lease. The
deferred rent approximated $139.6 million on August 25, 2018, and $130.2 million on August 26, 2017.

The Company has a fleet of vehicles used for delivery to its commercial customers and stores and travel for
members of field management. The majority of these vehicles are held under capital leases. At August 25, 2018,
the Company had capital lease assets of $156.8 million, net of accumulated amortization of $79.9 million, and
capital lease obligations of $154.3 million, of which $52.3 million is classified as Accrued expenses and other as
it represents the current portion of these obligations. At August 26, 2017, the Company had capital lease assets of
$152.0 million, net of accumulated amortization of $70.2 million, and capital lease obligations of $150.5 million,
of which $48.1 million is classified as Accrued expenses and other as it represents the current portion of these
obligations.

Future minimum annual rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases and capital leases were as
follows at the end of fiscal 2018:

(in thousands)

2019 .............................................................................................................
2020 .............................................................................................................
2021 .............................................................................................................
2022 .............................................................................................................
2023 .............................................................................................................
Thereafter ....................................................................................................
Total minimum payments required .............................................................
Less: Interest ...............................................................................................
Present value of minimum capital lease payments ......................................

Note P – Commitments and Contingencies

Operating
Leases

Capital
Leases

$ 300,866
289,007
267,298
244,786
215,237
823,969
$ 2,141,163

52,290
50,777
38,290
21,211
3,118
–
165,686
(11,383)
$ 154,303

Construction commitments, primarily for new stores, totaled approximately $41.3 million at August 25, 2018.

1
0
-
K

The Company had $106.8 million in outstanding standby letters of credit and $23.6 million in surety bonds as of
August 25, 2018, which all have expiration periods of less than one year. A substantial portion of the outstanding
standby letters of credit (which are primarily renewed on an annual basis) and surety bonds are used to cover
reimbursement obligations to our workers’ compensation carriers. There are no additional contingent liabilities
associated with these instruments as the underlying liabilities are already reflected in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The standby letters of credit and surety bonds arrangements have automatic renewal clauses.

Note Q – Litigation

In July 2014, the Company received a subpoena from the District Attorney of the County of Alameda, along with
other environmental prosecutorial offices in the state of California, seeking documents and information related to
the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous waste. The Company received notice that the District Attorney
will seek injunctive and monetary relief. The Company is cooperating fully with the request and cannot predict
the ultimate outcome of these efforts, although the Company has accrued all amounts it believes to be probable
and reasonably estimable. The Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a
material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Arising out of an April 2016 letter from the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”), one of the Company’s
formerly-owned subsidiaries was sued in March 2018 by CARB seeking penalties, among other relief, for alleged
violations of the California Health and Safety Code, Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations and the
California Vehicle Code related to the sale and advertisement of certain aftermarket motor vehicle pollution
control parts in the State of California. On February 26, 2018, the Company completed its transaction to sell
substantially all of the assets, net of assumed liabilities related to its AutoAnything operations. As part of the sale,
the Company retained the liability related to this lawsuit. The Company is cooperating fully with the lawsuit and
cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these efforts. The Company does not believe that any resolution of the
matter will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.

The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business, including,
but not limited to, several lawsuits containing class-action allegations in which the plaintiffs are current and
former hourly and salaried employees who allege various wage and hour violations and unlawful termination
practices. The Company does not currently believe that, either individually or in the aggregate, these matters will
result in liabilities material to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Note R – Segment Reporting

The Company’s operating segments (Domestic Auto Parts, Mexico and Brazil; and IMC results through April 4,
2018) are aggregated as one reportable segment: Auto Parts Locations. The criteria the Company used to identify
the reportable segment are primarily the nature of the products the Company sells and the operating results that
are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about the resources to
be allocated to the business units and to assess performance. The accounting policies of the Company’s reportable
segment are the same as those described in “Note A – Significant Accounting Policies.”

The Auto Parts Locations segment is a retailer and distributor of automotive parts and accessories through the
Company’s 6,202 locations in the United States, Puerto Rico, Mexico and Brazil. Each location carries an
extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured
automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products.

The Other category reflects business activities of three operating segments that are not separately reportable due
to the materiality of these operating segments. The operating segments include ALLDATA, which produces, sells
and maintains diagnostic and repair information software used in the automotive repair industry; E-commerce,
which includes direct sales to customers through www.autozone.com for sales that are not fulfilled by local stores;
and AutoAnything, which includes direct sales to customers through www.autoanything.com, prior to the
Company’s sale of substantially all of its assets on February 26,2018.

The Company evaluates its reportable segment primarily on the basis of net sales and segment profit, which is
defined as gross profit. The following table shows segment results for the following fiscal years:

(in thousands)

Net Sales:
Auto Parts Locations ...........................................................
Other ....................................................................................
Total ....................................................................................

Segment Profit:
Auto Parts Locations ...........................................................
Other ....................................................................................
Gross profit ..........................................................................
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses(1) ..
Interest expense, net ............................................................
Income before income taxes ................................................

Segment Assets:
Auto Parts Locations ...........................................................
Other ....................................................................................
Total ....................................................................................

Capital Expenditures:
Auto Parts Locations ...........................................................
Other ....................................................................................
Total ....................................................................................

Auto Parts Locations Sales by Product Grouping:
Failure .................................................................................
Maintenance items...............................................................
Discretionary .......................................................................
Auto Parts Locations net sales .............................................

August 25,
2018

Year Ended
August 26,
2017

August 27,
2016

1
0
-
K

$ 10,951,498
269,579
$ 11,221,077

$ 10,523,272
365,404
$ 10,888,676

$ 10,261,112
374,564
$ 10,635,676

$ 5,805,561
168,185
5,973,746
(4,162,890)
(174,527)
$ 1,636,329

$ 5,544,494
195,126
5,739,620
(3,659,551)
(154,580)
$ 1,925,489

$ 5,410,477
198,259
5,608,736
(3,548,341)
(147,681)
$ 1,912,714

$ 9,231,021
115,959
$ 9,346,980

$ 8,964,371
295,410
$ 9,259,781

$ 8,351,883
247,904
$ 8,599,787

499,762
22,026
521,788

533,304
20,528
553,832

470,631
18,160
488,791

$ 5,338,890
3,914,546
1,698,062
$ 10,951,498

$ 5,100,702
3,774,386
1,648,184
$ 10,523,272

$ 4,913,423
3,721,240
1,626,449
$ 10,261,112

(1) Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2018 include $130.3 million related to pension

termination charges and $193.2 million related to impairment charges.

Note S – Quarterly Summary(1)
(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

Twelve Weeks Ended

November 18,
2017

February 10,
2018(3)(5)

May 5,
2018(5)

Sixteen
Weeks Ended
August 25,
2018(2)(4)(5)

Net sales .......................................
Gross profit ...................................
Operating profit ............................
Income before income taxes .........
Net income ...................................
Basic earnings per share ...............
Diluted earnings per share ............

$ 2,589,131
1,365,848
468,754
429,865
281,003
10.17
10.00

$ 2,413,026
1,277,046
205,098
165,758
289,530
10.58
10.38

$ 2,660,152
1,422,974
545,765
503,807
366,721
13.62
13.42

3,558,769
1,907,879
591,239
536,899
400,282
15.27
15.02

(in thousands, except per share data)

Twelve Weeks Ended

November 19,
2016

February 11,
2017

May 6,
2017

Sixteen
Weeks Ended
August 26,
2017(2)

1
0
-
K

$ 2,467,845
1,301,542
458,902
425,596
278,125
9.61
9.36

$ 2,289,219
1,205,536
383,969
349,771
237,145
8.28
8.08

$ 2,619,007
1,378,418
529,570
493,895
331,700
11.70
11.44

3,512,605
1,854,125
707,628
656,227
433,899
15.52
15.27

(1) The sum of quarterly amounts may not equal the annual amounts reported due to rounding. In addition, the
earnings per share amounts are computed independently for each quarter while the full year is based on the
annual weighted average shares outstanding.

(2) The fourth quarter for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 are based on a 16-week period. All other quarters presented

are based on a 12-week period.

(3) The second quarter of fiscal 2018 includes impairment charges of $193.2 million. See “Note M – Sale of

Assets.”

(4) The fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 includes pension termination charges of $130.3 million. See “Note L -

Pension and Savings Plans.”

(5) Net income of the second, third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 benefitted from changes due to Tax Reform.

See “Note D – Income Taxes.”

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

As of August 25, 2018, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of
AutoZone’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as amended. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of August 25, 2018.

Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
August 25, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.

1
0
-
K

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

PART III

The information set forth in Part I of this document in the section entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant,”
is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item. Additionally, the information contained in AutoZone,
Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 26, 2018, in the sections entitled “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors” and
“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to
this item.

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Executives that applies to its chief executive
officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and other financial executives. The Company has made the
Code of Ethical Conduct available on its investor relations website at http://www.autozoneinc.com.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 26, 2018, in the section entitled
“Executive Compensation,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters

1
0
-
K

The information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 26, 2018, in the sections entitled
“Security Ownership of Management and Board of Directors,” “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners” and “Equity Compensation Plans – Summary Table” is incorporated herein by reference in response to
this item.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Not applicable.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 26, 2018, in the section entitled
“Proposal 2 – Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” is incorporated herein by
reference in response to this item.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

The following information required under this item is filed as part of this report.

(a) Financial Statements

The following financial statements, related notes and reports of independent registered public accounting firm are
filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K in Part II, Item 8:

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended August 25, 2018, August 26, 2017, and August

27, 2016

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended ended August 25, 2018, August

26, 2017, and August 27, 2016

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 25, 2018, and August 26, 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended ended August 25, 2018, August 26, 2017,

and August 27, 2016

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the fiscal years ended ended August 25, 2018, August

26, 2017, and August 27, 2016

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(b) Exhibits

The following exhibits are being filed herewith:

3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 13, 1999.

3.2 Seventh Amended and Restated By-Laws of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1

to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2018.

4.1 Indenture dated as of August 8, 2003, between AutoZone, Inc. and Bank One Trust Company, N.A.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-
107828) filed August 11, 2003.

4.2 Officers’ Certificate dated August 4, 2008, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 11,
2003, setting forth the terms of the 7.125% Senior Notes due 2018. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008.

4.3 Form of 7.125% Senior Note due 2018. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated August

4, 2008.

4.4 Officers’ Certificate dated November 15, 2010, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated

August 8, 2003, setting forth the terms of the 4.000% Notes due 2020. Incorporated by reference to
4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 15, 2010.

4.5 Form of 4.000% Senior Note due 2020. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated

November 15, 2010.

4.6 Officers’ Certificate dated April 24, 2012, pursuant to section 3.2 of the indenture dated August 8,
2003, setting forth the terms of the 3.700% Senior Notes due 2022. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 24, 2012.

4.7 Form of 3.700% Senior Notes due 2022. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated April

24, 2012

1
0
-
K

4.8 Officers’ Certificate dated November 13, 2012, pursuant to section 3.2 of the indenture dated August
8, 2003, setting forth the terms of the 2.875% Senior Notes due 2023. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 13, 2012.

4.9 Form of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2023. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated

November 13, 2012.

4.10 Officers’ Certificate dated April 29, 2013, pursuant to section 3.2 of the indenture dated August 8,

2003, setting forth the terms of the 3.125% Senior Notes due 2023. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 29, 2013.

4.11 Form of 3.125% Senior Notes due 2023. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K

dated April 29, 2013.

4.12 Officers’ Certificate dated April 29, 2015, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 8,

2003, setting forth the terms of the 2.500% Senior Notes due 2021. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 29, 2015.

4.13 Form of 2.500% Note dated 2021. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report on

Form 8-K dated April 29, 2015.

1
0
-
K

4.14 Officers’ Certificate dated April 29, 2015, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 8,

2003, setting forth the terms of the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2025. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 29, 2015.

4.15 Form of 3.250% Note due 2025. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Current Report on

Form 8-K dated April 29, 2015.

4.16 Officers’ Certificate dated April 21, 2016, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 8,

2003, setting forth the terms of the 1.625% Senior Notes due 2019. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2016.

4.17 Form of 1.625% Senior Notes due 2019. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Current

Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2016.

4.18 Officers’ Certificate dated April 21, 2016, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 8,

2003, setting forth the terms of the 3.125% Senior Notes due 2026. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2016.

4.19

Form of 3.125% Senior Notes due 2026. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2016.

4.20 Officers’ Certificate dated April 18, 2017, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 8,

2003, setting forth the terms of the 3.750% Senior Notes due 2027. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 2017.

4.21 Form of 3.750% Senior Notes due 2027. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current

Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 2017.

*10.1 Second Amended and Restated 1998 Director Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to

Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2000.

*10.2 AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the
definitive proxy statement dated November 1, 2002, for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held
December 12, 2002.

*10.3 AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix D to the
definitive proxy statement dated November 1, 2002, for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held
December 12, 2002.

*10.4 Third Amendment to the AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Incorporated by

reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated December 12, 2012.

*10.5 AutoZone, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the definitive

proxy statement dated October 25, 2006, for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held December 13,
2006.

*10.6 Form of Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report

on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2007.

*10.7 Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference

to Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 4, 2008.

*10.8 Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference

to Exhibit 99.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 4, 2008.

*10.9 AutoZone, Inc. Enhanced Severance Pay Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the

Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.

*10.10 Form of non-compete and non-solicitation agreement for Section 16 executive officers and by

AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated
February 15, 2008.

1
0
-
K

*10.11

Form of non-compete and non-solicitation agreement approved by AutoZone’s Compensation
Committee for execution by non-executive officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.

*10.12 Agreement dated February 14, 2008, between AutoZone, Inc. and William C. Rhodes, III.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 15,
2008.

*10.13 Form of non-compete and non-solicitation agreement for Non-Section 16 officers and by AutoZone,
Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended May 3, 2008.

*10.14 AutoZone, Inc. 2010 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
A to the definitive proxy statement dated October 26, 2009, for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
held December 16, 2009.

*10.15 AutoZone, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the
definitive proxy statement dated October 25, 2010, for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held
December 15, 2010.

*10.16 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2006 Stock Option Plan, effective September 2010.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated December 16,
2010.

*10.17 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2006 Stock Option Plan for certain executive officers,

effective September 2010. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q dated December 16, 2010.

1
0
-
K

*10.18 Form of Letter Agreement dated as of December 14, 2010, amending certain Stock Option

Agreements of executive officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q dated December 16, 2010.

*10.19 AutoZone, Inc. 2011 Director Compensation Program. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated December 16, 2010.

*10.20 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated March 17, 2011.

*10.21 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan for officers effective
September 27, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2011.

*10.22 First Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. Enhanced Severance Pay Plan. Incorporated by

reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated March 17, 2011.

*10.23 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan for officers effective
September 27, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2011.

*10.24 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan for certain executive

officers effective September 27, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2011.

*10.25 Sixth Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by

reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 27,
2011.

*10.26 Second Amended AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference

to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2011.

*10.27 Offer letter dated April 26, 2012, to Ronald B. Griffin. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 of

Annual Report on Form 10-K dated October 22, 2012.

*10.28 Offer letter dated February 7, 2013, to Albert Saltiel. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated June 12, 2013.

*10.29 Third Amendment to the AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan incorporated by

reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated December 12, 2012.

*10.30 Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan dated December 17,
2013. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated March
25, 2014.

*10.31 AutoZone, Inc. Director Compensation Program effective January 1, 2014. Incorporated by

reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated March 25, 2014.

*10.32

Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Award Plan dated December 16,
2015. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the definitive proxy statement dated October 26,
2015, for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held December 16, 2015.

10.33 Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 18, 2016, among AutoZone,

Inc., as Borrower, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 21,
2016.

10.34 364-Day Credit Agreement Dated as of November 18, 2016, among AutoZone, Inc. as Borrower, the

lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank National Association as Administrative Agent,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 21,
2016.

*10.35 AutoZone, Inc. Sixth Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by

reference to Exhibit A to the definitive proxy statement dated October 24, 2016, for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders held December 14, 2016.

10.36 Master Extension, New Commitment and Amendment Agreement dated as of November 18, 2017

among AutoZone, Inc. as Borrower; Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent and Swingline
Lender; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Syndication Agent; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Joint Lead Arrangers; Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.,
U.S. Bank National Association, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Barclay’s Capital as Joint Book
Runners; SunTrust Bank, U.S. Bank National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
and Barclay’s Bank PLC as Documentation Agents; and the several lenders party thereto.

12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted Pursuant

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted Pursuant

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

1
0
-
K

101.INS XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Document

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Document

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Schedules are omitted because the information is not required or because the information required is included in
the financial statements or notes thereto.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

1
0
-
K

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

AUTOZONE, INC.

By:

/s/ WILLIAM C. RHODES, III
William C. Rhodes, III
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: October 24, 2018

1
0
-
K

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

SIGNATURE

TITLE

DATE

/s/ WILLIAM C. RHODES, III
William C. Rhodes, III

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

October 24, 2018

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ WILLIAM T. GILES
William T. Giles

Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
President – Finance and Information Technology

October 24, 2018

(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ CHARLIE PLEAS, III
Charlie Pleas, III

Senior Vice President and Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

1
0
-
K

/s/ DOUGLAS H. BROOKS
Douglas H. Brooks

Director

/s/ LINDA A. GOODSPEED
Linda A. Goodspeed

Director

/s/ EARL G. GRAVES, JR.
Earl G. Graves, Jr.

Director

/s/ ENDERSON GUIMARAES
Enderson Guimaraes

Director

/s/ J.R. HYDE, III
J.R. Hyde, III

/s/ D. BRYAN JORDAN
D. Bryan Jordan

/s/ GALE V. KING
Gale V. King

Director

/s/ W. ANDREW MCKENNA
W. Andrew McKenna

Director

/s/ GEORGE R. MRKONIC, JR.
George R. Mrkonic, Jr.

Director

/s/ LUIS P. NIETO
Luis P. Nieto

/s/ JILL A. SOLTAU
Jill A. Soltau

Director

October 24, 2018

Exhibit 12.1

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except ratios)

2018
(52 weeks)

Fiscal Year Ended August
2016
(52 weeks)

2017
(52 weeks)

2015
(52 weeks)

2014
(52 weeks)

Earnings:
Income before income taxes(1) ..............................
Fixed charges ........................................................
Less: Capitalized interest ......................................
Adjusted earnings .............................................

Fixed charges:
Gross interest expense ..........................................
Amortization of debt expense ...............................
Interest portion of rent expense ............................
Fixed charges ....................................................

$ 1,636,329
280,033
(1,505)
$ 1,914,857

$ 1,925,489
253,751
(1,247)
$ 2,177,993

$ 1,912,714
238,389
(909)
$ 2,150,194

$ 1,802,612
236,996
(963)
$ 2,038,645

$ 1,662,714
249,513
(1,041)
$ 1,911,186

$ 173,276
8,392
98,365
$ 280,033

$ 150,960
8,369
94,422
$ 253,751

$ 142,981
7,980
87,428
$ 238,389

$ 146,777
6,230
83,989
$ 236,996

$ 163,544
6,856
79,113
$ 249,513

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................

6.8

8.6

9.0

8.6

7.7

(1) Fiscal 2018 income before income taxes includes $130.3 million related to pension termination charges and $193.2 million

related to impairment charges.

1
0
-
K

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Exhibit 21.1

NAME

ALLDATA LLC
AutoZone.com, Inc.
AutoZone de México, S. de R.L. de C.V.
AutoZone Development LLC
AutoZone IP LLC
AutoZone Northeast LLC
AutoZone Parts, Inc.
AutoZone Puerto Rico, Inc.
AutoZone Stores LLC
AutoZone Texas LLC
AutoZone West LLC
Riverside Captive Insurance Company

STATE OR COUNTRY OF
ORGANIZATION OR INCORPORATION
Nevada
Virginia
Mexico
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Puerto Rico
Nevada
Nevada
Nevada
Arizona

In addition, 30 subsidiaries operating in the United States and 24 subsidiaries operating outside of the United
States have been omitted as they would not, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, constitute a
significant subsidiary as defined by Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.

1
0
-
K

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

Exhibit 23.1

Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-42797) pertaining to the AutoZone, Inc. Amended and Restated
Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-88241) pertaining to the AutoZone, Inc. Amended and Restated
Director Compensation Plan

Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75140) pertaining to the AutoZone, Inc. Executive Stock Purchase
Plan

Registration Statement (Form S-3ASR No. 333-152592) pertaining to a shelf registration to sell debt
securities

Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-171186) pertaining to the AutoZone, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive
Award Plan

Registration Statement (Form S-3ASR No. 333-180768) pertaining to a shelf registration to sell debt
securities

Registration Statement (Form S-3ASR No. 333-203439) pertaining to a shelf registration to sell debt
securities

of our reports dated October 24, 2018, with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of AutoZone, Inc. and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of AutoZone, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of AutoZone, Inc. for the year ended August 25, 2018.

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

1
0
-
K

Memphis, Tennessee
October 24, 2018

1
0
-
K

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William C. Rhodes, III, certify that:

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AutoZone, Inc. (“registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;

conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred

during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial

reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in

the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

October 24, 2018

/s/ WILLIAM C. RHODES, III
William C. Rhodes, III
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William T. Giles, certify that:

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AutoZone, Inc. (“registrant”);

conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred

1
0
-
K

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial

reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in

the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

October 24, 2018

/s/ WILLIAM T. GILES
William T. Giles
Chief Financial Officer and Executive
Vice President – Finance and Information
Technology
(Principal Financial Officer)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AutoZone, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25,
2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William C. Rhodes, III,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Exhibit 32.1

(i)

(ii)

October 24, 2018

1
0
-
K

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

/s/ WILLIAM C. RHODES, III
William C. Rhodes, III
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AutoZone, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25,
2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William T. Giles, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

(i)

(ii)

October 24, 2018

/s/ WILLIAM T. GILES
William T. Giles
Chief Financial Officer and Executive
Vice President – Finance and Information
Technology
(Principal Financial Officer)

1
0
-
K

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Corporate information

Corporate Information
Corporate Information

AutoZone’s CEO Team
AutoZone’s CEO Team

Our current leadership team works tirelessly to support and continue to enhance the AutoZone that exists today. We lead as a team and we win as a team.
Through their support and guidance, but most importantly through the commitment and passion of approximately 90,000 AutoZoners, the Company is well
positioned for future growth and prosperity.

Ofﬁcers
Customer Satisfaction

Executive Vice Presidents
Customer Satisfaction

William C. Rhodes, III†
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Ofﬁcer

Mark A. Finestone†
Merchandising, Supply
Chain and Marketing

William T. Giles†
Chief Financial Ofﬁcer,
Finance and Information
Technology

William W. Graves†
Mexico, Brazil and
Store Development

Thomas B. Newbern†
Store Operations,
Commercial, Loss
Prevention and ALLDATA

Senior Vice Presidents
Customer Satisfaction

Philip B. Daniele†
Commercial

William R. Hackney†
Merchandising

Domingo Hurtado†
International

Rodney C. Halsell†
Supply Chain

Charlie Pleas, III†
Controller

Ronald B. Grifﬁn†
Chief Information
Ofﬁcer, IT

Vice Presidents
Customer Satisfaction

Albert Saltiel†
Marketing and
E-Commerce

Richard C. Smith†
Human Resources

Kristen Collier Wright†
General Counsel and
Secretary

Jennie E. Anderson
Loss Prevention

Catherine M. Culnane
IT

Timothy J. Goddard
Store Development

John L. Lammers
Merchandising

Edward Beltran
Stores

Anthony J. Dudek
IT

Eric S. Gould
Replenishment

Maria M. Leggett
Assistant General Counsel
and Assistant Secretary

Raymond A. Pohlman
Government and
Community Relations

Anthony D. Rose, Jr.
Visual Merchandising

B. Craig Blackwell
Stores

Robert A. Durkin
Distribution

Matthew C. Harmon
Beneﬁts, Compensation
and HR Systems

Dennis W. LeRiche
Stores

Joe L. Sellers, Jr.
Commercial Sales

James W. Blair
Global Sourcing

William R. Edwards II
Merchandising

Matt Henson
Field Human Resources

Mitchell C. Major
Commercial Support

Brett L. Shanaman
Marketing

Charles D. Blank
Stores

Joseph Espinosa
Stores

Troy L. Hitchcock
Merchandising

S. Jame Maki
E-Commerce

Steven M. Stoll
Merchandising

Mauricio Braz
Presidente
AutoZone do Brasil

Duane M. Findley
Stores

Robert C. Hunter
Merchandising Pricing
and Analysis

Michael B. Campanaro
IT

Preston B. Frazer
Operations Support

Joyce L. Johns
Internal Audit

Brian L. Campbell
Tax, Treasury and
Investor Relations

Patricia N. Glancy
Talent Development
Diversity and
Communications

Thomas A. Kliman
Tax

Satwinder Mangat
President
ALLDATA

Grant E. McGee
Stores

J. Scott Murphy
Strategic Planning and
Business Development

Patrick D. B. Webb
Presidente
AutoZone de Mexico

Solomon A. Woldeslassie
Transportation

Lawrence H. Yeske
Merchandising

† Required to ﬁle under Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

Board of Directors

Douglas H. Brooks (2)
Former Chairman, President and
CEO – Brinker International

Linda A. Goodspeed (1,2)
Former Managing Partner and COO
WealthStrategies Financial Advisors

Earl G. Graves, Jr. (3*,†)
President and CEO
Black Enterprise

Enderson Guimaraes (3)
Former President and COO
Laureate Education Inc.

J.R. Hyde, III
AutoZone Founder
Lead Director
GTx, Inc.

D. Bryan Jordan (1,3)
Chairman, President and CEO
First Horizon National Corporation

Gale V. King (2)
Executive Vice President & Chief
Administrative Ofﬁcer
Nationwide

W. Andrew McKenna (1*,2)
Former Senior Vice President
The Home Depot, Inc.

George R. Mrkonic, Jr. (1, 2*)
Non-Executive Chairman
MARU Group

Luis P. Nieto (1,3)
President
Nieto Advisory LLC

William C. Rhodes, III
Chairman, President and CEO
AutoZone, Inc.

Jill Soltau (3)
CEO
J.C. Penney Company, Inc.

(1) Audit Committee, (2) Compensation Committee, (3) Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee, * Committee Chair, † Lead Director

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Investor Relations Website

Form of 10-K / Quarterly Report

Computershare Investor Services
P.O. Box 43069
Providence, RI 02940-3069
(877) 282-1168
(781) 575-2723
www.computershare.com

Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
AutoZone will be held at 8:00 a.m. CST, oTT n
December 19, 2018, at the J.R. Hyde III
Store Support Center, 123 South Front Street,
Memphis, Tennessee.

www.autozoneinc.com

Company Websites

www.autozone.com
www.autozonepro.com
www.alldata.com

Stock Exchange Listing

New York Stock Exchange
Ticker Symbol: AZO

Auditors

Ernst & YouYY ng, LLP
Memphis, Tennessee

Code of Ethical Conduct

AutoZone’s Code of Ethical Conduct is
available on its Investor Relations website
at www.autozoneinc.com.

Stockholders may obtain, free of charge, a
copy of AutoZone’s annual report on Form
10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
as ﬁled with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and quarterly press releases
by contacting
• Investor Relations
P.O. Box 2198
Memphis, TN 38101

• Phoning (901) 495-7185 or
• Emailing investor.relations@autozone.com

Copies of all documents ﬁled by AutoZone
with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including Annual Reports on Form 10-K and
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, are also
available at the SEC’s EDGAR server at
www.sec.gov.

Stockholders of Record

As of August 25, 2018, there were 2,268
stockholders of record, excluding the number
of beneﬁcial owners whose shares were
represented by security position listing.