Aviat Networks
Annual Report 2014

Plain-text annual report

2014 Proxy Statement & Annual Report Aviat Networks, Inc. Letter to Stockholders January 23, 2015 To Our Stockholders: Over the past year, we made significant strides in strengthening our business despite external and internal challenges along the way. Specifically, the market for microwave backhaul proved challenging as we experienced reduced spending by two of our largest customers. In addition, the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system to streamline processes and increase operational efficiency resulted in issues that led to delays in our financial reporting. We have taken steps to address these issues, some of which I’ll elaborate on in this letter. We are proud of several accomplishments in 2014. In fiscal year 2014 we achieved our objectives of: • diversifying streams of mobile operator revenue; • expanding existing relationships and acquiring new customers; • • launching the CTR and WTM3300 platforms; improving operational costs and efficiencies; and • accelerating product innovation. We made significant progress updating our entire portfolio with new microwave, millimeter wave and IP routing solutions. We introduced the first versions of our CTR8000 platform with both CTR8440 and CTR8540 models. The CTR is a transformational microwave product line that efficiently integrates microwave transport and IP routing in a single solution. We also introduced our first millimeter wave solution, the WTM3300, in a very small form factor suited to dense urban and small cell applications. We continued to develop our Professional Services portfolio, providing managed network services to key customers in Africa and expanding the number of customer networks managed from our North America Network Operations Center (NOC). Our end to end support service capabilities are critical to our long- term strategy and differentiate us from other specialist microwave backhaul providers. To address the changing dynamics in the market for microwave backhaul, we took immediate actions to improve our cost structure, with particular focus on generating cash and operating leverage under a broad range of scenarios. As a result, we made year-over-year reductions in selling and administrative expenses and research and development spending, illustrating our focus on preserving cash and improving profitability. Further, we are encouraged by a stronger backlog as we entered fiscal 2015 as compared to the prior fiscal year. Notwithstanding this and the momentum of our new product platforms, we see further room for improving our business processes and balance sheet. We are dedicated to generating significantly better results for our stockholders in fiscal year 2015. Letter to Stockholders January 23, 2015 To Our Stockholders: Over the past year, we made significant strides in strengthening our business despite external and internal challenges along the way. Specifically, the market for microwave backhaul proved challenging as we experienced reduced spending by two of our largest customers. In addition, the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system to streamline processes and increase operational efficiency resulted in issues that led to delays in our financial reporting. We have taken steps to address these issues, some of which I’ll elaborate on in this letter. We are proud of several accomplishments in 2014. In fiscal year 2014 we achieved our objectives of: • diversifying streams of mobile operator revenue; • expanding existing relationships and acquiring new customers; • • • accelerating product innovation. launching the CTR and WTM3300 platforms; improving operational costs and efficiencies; and We made significant progress updating our entire portfolio with new microwave, millimeter wave and IP routing solutions. We introduced the first versions of our CTR8000 platform with both CTR8440 and CTR8540 models. The CTR is a transformational microwave product line that efficiently integrates microwave transport and IP routing in a single solution. We also introduced our first millimeter wave solution, the WTM3300, in a very small form factor suited to dense urban and small cell applications. We continued to develop our Professional Services portfolio, providing managed network services to key customers in Africa and expanding the number of customer networks managed from our North America Network Operations Center (NOC). Our end to end support service capabilities are critical to our long- term strategy and differentiate us from other specialist microwave backhaul providers. To address the changing dynamics in the market for microwave backhaul, we took immediate actions to improve our cost structure, with particular focus on generating cash and operating leverage under a broad range of scenarios. As a result, we made year-over-year reductions in selling and administrative expenses and research and development spending, illustrating our focus on preserving cash and improving profitability. Further, we are encouraged by a stronger backlog as we entered fiscal 2015 as compared to the prior fiscal year. Notwithstanding this and the momentum of our new product platforms, we see further room for improving our business processes and balance sheet. We are dedicated to generating significantly better results for our stockholders in fiscal year 2015. 1 Our Fiscal Year 2014 Financial Results Operational Focus for Fiscal Year 2015 For fiscal year 2014, we reported revenue of $346.0 million, compared with revenue of $471.3 million in the prior year, a 27% year-over-year decrease. GAAP net loss, including discontinued operations, for fiscal year 2014 was $(51.2) million, or $(0.83) per share, compared with a net loss of $(15.0) million, or $(0.25) per share, for fiscal year 2013. Further optimization of our business led to a reduction in non-GAAP operating expenses to $120.4 million from $127.6 million in the prior year. On a non-GAAP basis we reported income (loss) from continuing operations of $(35.7) million, or $(0.58) per share, compared with income from continuing operations of $11.0 million, or $0.18 per share, in the prior year. Our cash balance at the end of the year was $48.8 million, down from $90.0 million in the prior year. Contributing to the decline in cash were operating losses, a tax payment to a foreign jurisdiction related to prior periods, capital expenditure for the new ERP system and R&D spending on the necessary refresh of our product portfolio. Subsequent to the close of our fiscal year, we experienced issues with our year-end financial reporting process, resulting in delays to the filing of our fiscal year 2014 financial statements. Although the additional review process was procedurally lengthy, it did not result in any prior period restatements. With the filings behind us, we have identified areas within the business in which to invest to assure the timely filing of our future financial statements. Our Market Opportunity The volume of data to be transported across telecom networks will continue to grow rapidly. Cloud computing, music and video subscription services and even more capable wireless devices, sensors and appliances drive the need for high bandwidth connections that can only be delivered by microwave, millimeter wave or optical fiber. As mobile network operators address this capacity demand with the addition of smaller and smaller cell sizes, the opportunity for our wireless technologies will be significant. In emerging markets, mobile network operators now own and operate the most modern communications networks within their respective regions. They can further leverage these network assets to provide high speed broadband services to fixed locations such as small, medium and large business enterprises, airports, hotels, hospitals and educational institutions. Microwave and millimeter wave backhaul is ideally suited to providing high speed broadband connections to these end points. We continue to see attractive opportunities in additional market segments: • Fixed data communications service providers in developing countries are looking to cost- effectively enhance business enterprises’ access to the global internet. • Public safety and national security agencies are increasing the capabilities of their wireless networks to provide remote video surveillance, rapid access to central databases from the field and more secure communications. • Utility networks are increasingly using sophisticated control and automation in remote locations to more efficiently handle energy generation and distribution. We are confident that Aviat’s technology roadmap is well aligned with all of these evolving market requirements. 2 We will continue to improve our business processes to drive innovation, maximize our competitiveness, and increase efficiency. Our progress in these areas provides a solid foundation on which to successfully launch our full CTR 8000 family of products. Aviat began shipping the CTR platform in the fiscal third quarter of 2014. Volume is expected to ramp into fiscal year 2015. There are additional opportunities to improve our structure and processes, starting with reducing complexities in the business and subsequently lowering facilities, systems and product costs. Management remains focused on improving Aviat’s cash balance in order to achieve greater financial and operational flexibility. In Closing We are encouraged by some signs of recovery we see in the market and the results of the restructuring actions management has accomplished, but there is more work to be done. To maximize our opportunities, we will continue to diligently focus on profitable growth and to work closely with our Board of Directors to tactically and strategically steer the company. I want to thank our stockholders and our employees for their support as we position the business to capitalize on the increasing global demand for mobile connectivity and data. As we strive for profitable growth, we are optimistic that we will be able to improve our liquidity position, strengthen our balance sheet and deliver increased stockholder value. Michael Pangia President and Chief Executive Officer Aviat Networks, Inc. This Letter to Stockholders contains statements that qualify as “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, but not limited to our plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; product backlog for fiscal 2015; new products, services or developments; potential market opportunities; future economic conditions; financial and operational outlook; our ability to increase shareholder value; projected cost and operational efficiencies; our growth potential; our product roadmap; and the potential known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that the industry and markets we serve are subject to may cause our actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by each forward-looking statement. These risks, uncertainties and other factors are discussed in our fiscal year 2014 Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Fiscal Year 2014 Financial Results Operational Focus for Fiscal Year 2015 For fiscal year 2014, we reported revenue of $346.0 million, compared with revenue of $471.3 million in the prior year, a 27% year-over-year decrease. GAAP net loss, including discontinued operations, for fiscal year 2014 was $(51.2) million, or $(0.83) per share, compared with a net loss of $(15.0) million, or $(0.25) per share, for fiscal year 2013. Further optimization of our business led to a reduction in non-GAAP operating expenses to $120.4 million from $127.6 million in the prior year. On a non-GAAP basis we reported income (loss) from continuing operations of $(35.7) million, or $(0.58) per share, compared with income from continuing operations of $11.0 million, or $0.18 per share, in the prior year. Our cash balance at the end of the year was $48.8 million, down from $90.0 million in the prior year. Contributing to the decline in cash were operating losses, a tax payment to a foreign jurisdiction related to prior periods, capital expenditure for the new ERP system and R&D spending on the necessary refresh of our product portfolio. Subsequent to the close of our fiscal year, we experienced issues with our year-end financial reporting process, resulting in delays to the filing of our fiscal year 2014 financial statements. Although the additional review process was procedurally lengthy, it did not result in any prior period restatements. With the filings behind us, we have identified areas within the business in which to invest to assure the timely filing of our future financial statements. Our Market Opportunity The volume of data to be transported across telecom networks will continue to grow rapidly. Cloud computing, music and video subscription services and even more capable wireless devices, sensors and appliances drive the need for high bandwidth connections that can only be delivered by microwave, millimeter wave or optical fiber. As mobile network operators address this capacity demand with the addition of smaller and smaller cell sizes, the opportunity for our wireless technologies will be significant. In emerging markets, mobile network operators now own and operate the most modern communications networks within their respective regions. They can further leverage these network assets to provide high speed broadband services to fixed locations such as small, medium and large business enterprises, airports, hotels, hospitals and educational institutions. Microwave and millimeter wave backhaul is ideally suited to providing high speed broadband connections to these end points. We continue to see attractive opportunities in additional market segments: • Fixed data communications service providers in developing countries are looking to cost- effectively enhance business enterprises’ access to the global internet. • Public safety and national security agencies are increasing the capabilities of their wireless networks to provide remote video surveillance, rapid access to central databases from the field and more secure communications. • Utility networks are increasingly using sophisticated control and automation in remote locations to more efficiently handle energy generation and distribution. We are confident that Aviat’s technology roadmap is well aligned with all of these evolving market requirements. We will continue to improve our business processes to drive innovation, maximize our competitiveness, and increase efficiency. Our progress in these areas provides a solid foundation on which to successfully launch our full CTR 8000 family of products. Aviat began shipping the CTR platform in the fiscal third quarter of 2014. Volume is expected to ramp into fiscal year 2015. There are additional opportunities to improve our structure and processes, starting with reducing complexities in the business and subsequently lowering facilities, systems and product costs. Management remains focused on improving Aviat’s cash balance in order to achieve greater financial and operational flexibility. In Closing We are encouraged by some signs of recovery we see in the market and the results of the restructuring actions management has accomplished, but there is more work to be done. To maximize our opportunities, we will continue to diligently focus on profitable growth and to work closely with our Board of Directors to tactically and strategically steer the company. I want to thank our stockholders and our employees for their support as we position the business to capitalize on the increasing global demand for mobile connectivity and data. As we strive for profitable growth, we are optimistic that we will be able to improve our liquidity position, strengthen our balance sheet and deliver increased stockholder value. Michael Pangia President and Chief Executive Officer Aviat Networks, Inc. This Letter to Stockholders contains statements that qualify as “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, but not limited to our plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; product backlog for fiscal 2015; new products, services or developments; potential market opportunities; future economic conditions; financial and operational outlook; our ability to increase shareholder value; projected cost and operational efficiencies; our growth potential; our product roadmap; and the potential known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that the industry and markets we serve are subject to may cause our actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by each forward-looking statement. These risks, uncertainties and other factors are discussed in our fiscal year 2014 Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 3 SCHEDULE A AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 Summaries RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND REGULATION G DISCLOSURE To supplement the consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), we provide additional measures of gross margin, research and development expenses, selling and administrative expenses, operating income or loss, income tax provision or benefit, income or loss from continuing operations, basic and diluted income or loss per share from continuing operations, and adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA"), adjusted to exclude certain costs, charges, gains and losses, as set forth below. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered together with the GAAP financial measures provide information that is useful to investors in understanding period-over-period operating results separate and apart from items that may, or could, have a disproportionate positive or negative impact on results in any particular period. We also believe these non-GAAP measures enhance the ability of investors to analyze trends in our business and to understand our performance. In addition, we may utilize non-GAAP financial measures as a guide in our forecasting, budgeting and long-term planning process and to measure operating performance for some management compensation purposes. Any analysis of non-GAAP financial measures should be used only in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures with the most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP follow. AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. Fiscal Year 2014 Summary RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (1) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 % of Revenue % of Revenue (In millions, except percentages and per share amounts) GAAP gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 85.1 24.6 % $ 140.1 29.7 % Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E&O inventory write down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of purchased technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP research and development expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP selling and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional taxes assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP selling and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E&O inventory write down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of purchased technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional taxes assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.1 1.2 0.2 — 86.6 35.5 (0.3) 35.2 88.8 (3.0) (0.6) 85.2 3.4 1.2 0.2 — 0.6 0.4 11.1 (33.8) GAAP operating income (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (50.7) (14.7)% $ 0.5 — — 0.6 141.2 39.4 (1.0) 38.4 95.5 (4.9) (1.4) 89.2 1.7 6.4 — — 0.6 1.4 0.4 3.1 25.0 % 10.3 % $ 10.2 % 25.7 % $ 24.6 % 30.0 % 8.4 % 8.1 % 20.3 % 18.9 % 0.4 % (9.8)% 13.6 2.9 % This page intentionally left blank. SCHEDULE A AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 Summaries RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND REGULATION G DISCLOSURE To supplement the consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), we provide additional measures of gross margin, research and development expenses, selling and administrative expenses, operating income or loss, income tax provision or benefit, income or loss from continuing operations, basic and diluted income or loss per share from continuing operations, and adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA"), adjusted to exclude certain costs, charges, gains and losses, as set forth below. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered together with the GAAP financial measures provide information that is useful to investors in understanding period-over-period operating results separate and apart from items that may, or could, have a disproportionate positive or negative impact on results in any particular period. We also believe these non-GAAP measures enhance the ability of investors to analyze trends in our business and to understand our performance. In addition, we may utilize non-GAAP financial measures as a guide in our forecasting, budgeting and long-term planning process and to measure operating performance for some management compensation purposes. Any analysis of non-GAAP financial measures should be used only in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures with the most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP follow. AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. Fiscal Year 2014 Summary RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (1) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 % of Revenue June 28, 2013 % of Revenue (In millions, except percentages and per share amounts) $ $ $ $ GAAP gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E&O inventory write down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of purchased technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP research and development expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP selling and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional taxes assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP selling and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP operating income (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E&O inventory write down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of purchased technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional taxes assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.1 0.1 1.2 0.2 — 86.6 35.5 (0.3) 35.2 88.8 (3.0) (0.6) 85.2 (50.7) 3.4 1.2 0.2 — 0.6 0.4 11.1 (33.8) 24.6 % $ 25.0 % 10.3 % $ 10.2 % 25.7 % $ 24.6 % (14.7)% $ (9.8)% 140.1 0.5 — — 0.6 141.2 39.4 (1.0) 38.4 95.5 (4.9) (1.4) 89.2 1.7 6.4 — — 0.6 1.4 0.4 3.1 13.6 29.7 % 30.0 % 8.4 % 8.1 % 20.3 % 18.9 % 0.4 % 2.9 % Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 % of Revenue June 28, 2013 % of Revenue (In millions, except percentages and per share amounts) 0.1 % — % 2.8 % 0.6 % (2.3)% 2.3 % GAAP interest and other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other nonrecurring income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP interest and other income, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP income tax provision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustment to reflect pro forma tax rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E&O inventory write down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of purchased technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional taxes assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other nonrecurring income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustment to reflect pro forma tax rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) per share from continuing operations Basic: GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted: GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.1 — 0.1 1.5 0.5 2.0 (52.1) 3.4 1.2 0.2 — 0.6 0.4 11.1 — (0.5) (35.7) (0.85) (0.58) (0.85) (0.58) — % $ — % 0.4 % $ 0.6 % (15.1)% $ (10.3)% $ $ $ $ $ Shares used in computing income (loss) per share from continuing operations Basic: GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted: GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61.6 61.6 61.6 61.6 0.7 (0.7) — 13.3 (10.7) 2.6 (10.9) 6.4 — — 0.6 1.4 0.4 3.1 (0.7) 10.7 11.0 (0.18) 0.18 (0.18) 0.18 60.0 61.3 60.0 61.9 ADJUSTED EBITDA: GAAP loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (52.1) (15.1)% $ (10.9) (2.3)% Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 % of Revenue % of Revenue (In millions, except percentages and per share amounts) Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E&O inventory write down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of purchased technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional taxes assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other nonrecurring income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1 0.4 3.4 1.2 0.2 — 0.6 0.4 11.1 — 1.5 5.6 0.8 6.4 — — 0.6 1.4 0.4 3.1 (0.7) 13.3 20.0 Adjusted EBITDA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (26.2) (7.6)% $ 4.2 % _____________________________________________________ (1) The adjustments above reconcile our GAAP financial results to the non-GAAP financial measures used by us. Our non- GAAP income or loss from continuing operations excluded share-based compensation, E&O inventory write down, warehouse consolidation costs, amortization of purchased technology, transactional taxes assessments, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, other nonrecurring income, and adjustment to reflect pro forma tax rate. Adjusted EBITDA was determined by excluding depreciation and amortization on property, plant and equipment, interest expense, provision for income taxes and non-GAAP pre-tax adjustments, as set forth above, from the GAAP loss from continuing operations. We believe that the presentation of these non-GAAP items provides meaningful supplemental information to investors, when viewed in conjunction with, and not in lieu of, our GAAP results. However, the non-GAAP financial measures have not been prepared under a comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. Non-GAAP information should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, there are material limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures. Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 % of Revenue % of Revenue (In millions, except percentages and per share amounts) GAAP interest and other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Other nonrecurring income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP interest and other income, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP income tax provision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Adjustment to reflect pro forma tax rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP income tax provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — % $ — % 0.4 % $ 0.6 % GAAP loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (52.1) (15.1)% $ 0.1 % — % 2.8 % 0.6 % (2.3)% Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E&O inventory write down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of purchased technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional taxes assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other nonrecurring income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustment to reflect pro forma tax rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic: Diluted: Basic: Diluted: Income (loss) per share from continuing operations GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Shares used in computing income (loss) per share from continuing operations GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-GAAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.1 — 0.1 1.5 0.5 2.0 3.4 1.2 0.2 — 0.6 0.4 11.1 — (0.5) (35.7) (0.85) (0.58) (0.85) (0.58) 61.6 61.6 61.6 61.6 0.7 (0.7) — 13.3 (10.7) 2.6 (10.9) 6.4 — — 0.6 1.4 0.4 3.1 (0.7) 10.7 11.0 (0.18) 0.18 (0.18) 0.18 60.0 61.3 60.0 61.9 Non-GAAP income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . $ (10.3)% $ 2.3 % Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 % of Revenue June 28, 2013 % of Revenue (In millions, except percentages and per share amounts) ADJUSTED EBITDA: GAAP loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E&O inventory write down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of purchased technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional taxes assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other nonrecurring income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted EBITDA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ (52.1) 7.1 0.4 3.4 1.2 0.2 — 0.6 0.4 11.1 — 1.5 (26.2) (15.1)% $ (7.6)% $ (10.9) 5.6 0.8 6.4 — — 0.6 1.4 0.4 3.1 (0.7) 13.3 20.0 (2.3)% 4.2 % _____________________________________________________ (1) The adjustments above reconcile our GAAP financial results to the non-GAAP financial measures used by us. Our non- GAAP income or loss from continuing operations excluded share-based compensation, E&O inventory write down, warehouse consolidation costs, amortization of purchased technology, transactional taxes assessments, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, other nonrecurring income, and adjustment to reflect pro forma tax rate. Adjusted EBITDA was determined by excluding depreciation and amortization on property, plant and equipment, interest expense, provision for income taxes and non-GAAP pre-tax adjustments, as set forth above, from the GAAP loss from continuing operations. We believe that the presentation of these non-GAAP items provides meaningful supplemental information to investors, when viewed in conjunction with, and not in lieu of, our GAAP results. However, the non-GAAP financial measures have not been prepared under a comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. Non-GAAP information should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, there are material limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures. AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95054 Notice of 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders To Be Held on Tuesday, February 24, 2015 TO THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK OF AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Aviat Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at our facilities, located at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, on Tuesday, February 24, 2015, at 11:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes: 1. To elect eight directors to serve until the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. 2. To vote on the ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015. 3. To hold an advisory, non-binding vote to approve the Company’s named executive officer compensation. 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement or other delay thereof. Annual Meeting. Only holders of common stock at the close of business on January 15, 2015, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we urge you to submit a proxy to vote your shares . This will help ensure the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. By Order of the Board of Directors /s/ Meena Elliott _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary January 23, 2015 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on February 24, 2015 The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available at https://www.proxyonline.com/docs/aviatnetwork2015/ Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. The Board of Directors urges you to sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card by mail (using the enclosed postage-paid envelope) as promptly as possible, or vote electronically or by telephone as described in the attached proxy statement. If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please contact the Company’s proxy solicitor, D.F. King & Co., toll-free at (800) 622-1573. This page intentionally left blank.AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95054 Notice of 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders To Be Held on Tuesday, February 24, 2015 TO THE HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK OF AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Aviat Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at our facilities, located at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, on Tuesday, February 24, 2015, at 11:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes: 1. To elect eight directors to serve until the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. 2. To vote on the ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015. 3. To hold an advisory, non-binding vote to approve the Company’s named executive officer compensation. 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement or other delay thereof. Only holders of common stock at the close of business on January 15, 2015, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we urge you to submit a proxy to vote your shares . This will help ensure the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. By Order of the Board of Directors /s/ Meena Elliott _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary January 23, 2015 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on February 24, 2015 The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available at https://www.proxyonline.com/docs/aviatnetwork2015/ Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. The Board of Directors urges you to sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card by mail (using the enclosed postage-paid envelope) as promptly as possible, or vote electronically or by telephone as described in the attached proxy statement. If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please contact the Company’s proxy solicitor, D.F. King & Co., toll-free at (800) 622-1573. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Discussion and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Committee Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary Compensation Table. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Option Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity Compensation Plan Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Nominees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agreement with Certain Stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL NO. 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL NO. 3: ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OTHER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 Annual Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Form 10-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 20 20 27 27 28 30 30 32 33 33 36 36 36 36 37 37 39 39 39 39 ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What is the record date, and who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What are the voting rights of the holders of common stock at the Annual Meeting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Who may attend the Annual Meeting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How do I vote? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How can I access the proxy materials and annual report on the Internet? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Why is Aviat soliciting proxies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How do I revoke my proxy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What vote is required to approve each item? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How is the majority voting standard applied to the election of directors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What constitutes a quorum, abstention, and broker “non-vote”? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Who pays for the cost of solicitation? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What is the deadline for submitting proposals and director nominations for the 2015 Annual Meeting?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Who will count the votes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board Member Qualifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Directors’ Biographies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board Leadership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principles of Corporate Governance, Bylaws and other Governance Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board of Directors Committees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Audit Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Committee Interlock and Insider Participation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Governance and Nominating Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stockholder Communications with the Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Code of Conduct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year 2014 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Indemnification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 8 8 9 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 ii ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Discussion and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Committee Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary Compensation Table. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Option Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity Compensation Plan Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Nominees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agreement with Certain Stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL NO. 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL NO. 3: ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OTHER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 Annual Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Form 10-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 20 20 27 27 28 30 30 32 33 33 36 36 36 36 37 37 39 39 39 39 ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What is the record date, and who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What are the voting rights of the holders of common stock at the Annual Meeting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Who may attend the Annual Meeting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How do I vote? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How can I access the proxy materials and annual report on the Internet? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Why is Aviat soliciting proxies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How do I revoke my proxy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What vote is required to approve each item? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How is the majority voting standard applied to the election of directors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What constitutes a quorum, abstention, and broker “non-vote”? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Who pays for the cost of solicitation? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What is the deadline for submitting proposals and director nominations for the 2015 Annual Meeting?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Who will count the votes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board Member Qualifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Directors’ Biographies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board Leadership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principles of Corporate Governance, Bylaws and other Governance Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board of Directors Committees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Audit Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Committee Interlock and Insider Participation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Governance and Nominating Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stockholder Communications with the Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Code of Conduct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year 2014 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Indemnification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 8 8 9 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 i ii ii AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2015 This proxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”) applies to the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Aviat Networks, Inc. (which we refer to as “Aviat,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “ours”) for use at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournment, postponement or other delay thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), to be held at 11:00 a.m., local time, on Tuesday, February 24, 2015. The Annual Meeting will be held at our facilities located at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054. The telephone number at that location is (408) 567-7000. These proxy materials are being made available on or about January 23, 2015, to our stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting? The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to obtain stockholder action on the matters outlined in the notice of meeting included with this Proxy Statement. All holders of shares of common stock at the close of business on January 15, 2015, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders will vote (i) to elect eight directors; (ii) on the ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015; and (iii) on an advisory, non-binding resolution to approve the Company’s named executive officer compensation. What is the record date, and who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting? The record date for the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is January 15, 2015 (the “Record Date”). The Record Date was established by the Board as required by the Delaware General Corporation Law and our Bylaws. Owners of shares of our common stock at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote at the Annual Meeting. You may vote all shares that you owned as of the Record Date. What are the voting rights of the holders of common stock at the Annual Meeting? Each outstanding share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter considered at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 62,328,265 shares of our common stock outstanding. Who may attend the Annual Meeting? Subject to space availability, all stockholders as of the Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. Since seating is limited, admission to the Annual Meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. If your shares are held in “street name” (that is, through a bank, broker or other holder of record) and you wish to attend the Annual Meeting, you must bring to the Annual Meeting a copy of a bank or brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the Record Date. Each stockholder may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting. You may contact us by calling (408) 567-7000 for directions to the Annual Meeting. 1 This page intentionally left blank.AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2015 This proxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”) applies to the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Aviat Networks, Inc. (which we refer to as “Aviat,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “ours”) for use at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournment, postponement or other delay thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), to be held at 11:00 a.m., local time, on Tuesday, February 24, 2015. The Annual Meeting will be held at our facilities located at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054. The telephone number at that location is (408) 567-7000. These proxy materials are being made available on or about January 23, 2015, to our stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting? The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to obtain stockholder action on the matters outlined in the notice of meeting included with this Proxy Statement. All holders of shares of common stock at the close of business on January 15, 2015, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders will vote (i) to elect eight directors; (ii) on the ratification of the appointment by our Audit Committee of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015; and (iii) on an advisory, non-binding resolution to approve the Company’s named executive officer compensation. What is the record date, and who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting? The record date for the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is January 15, 2015 (the “Record Date”). The Record Date was established by the Board as required by the Delaware General Corporation Law and our Bylaws. Owners of shares of our common stock at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote at the Annual Meeting. You may vote all shares that you owned as of the Record Date. What are the voting rights of the holders of common stock at the Annual Meeting? Each outstanding share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter considered at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 62,328,265 shares of our common stock outstanding. Who may attend the Annual Meeting? Subject to space availability, all stockholders as of the Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. Since seating is limited, admission to the Annual Meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. If your shares are held in “street name” (that is, through a bank, broker or other holder of record) and you wish to attend the Annual Meeting, you must bring to the Annual Meeting a copy of a bank or brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the Record Date. Each stockholder may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting. You may contact us by calling (408) 567-7000 for directions to the Annual Meeting. 11 Proxy StatementHow do I vote? Stockholders of record can vote by proxy as follows: t n e m e t a t S y x o r P • Via the Internet: Stockholders may submit voting instructions through the Internet by following the instructions included with the proxy card. • By Telephone: Stockholders may submit voting instructions by telephone by following the instructions included with the proxy card. • By Mail: Stockholders may sign, date and return their proxy card in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided. Stockholders may not cumulate votes in the election of directors. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” all nominees. • Proposal No. 2 (ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm): the affirmative vote by the holders of common stock entitled to cast a majority of the voting power of all of the common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is necessary for approval of Proposal No. 2. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal No. 2. • Proposal No. 3 (advisory, non-binding vote on named executive officer compensation): the affirmative vote by the holders of common stock entitled to cast a majority of the voting power of all of the common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is necessary for approval of Proposal No. 3. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal No. 3. • At the Annual Meeting: If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person by ballot, even if you have previously returned a proxy card. How is the majority voting policy applied to the election of directors? If you hold your shares in “street name,” the bank, broker or other holder of record holding your shares will send you separate instructions describing the procedure for voting your shares. If you hold your shares in “street name,” you will not be able to vote in person by ballot at the Annual Meeting unless you have previously requested and obtained a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other holder of record and present it at the Annual Meeting. How can I access the proxy materials and annual report on the Internet? This Proxy Statement, the form of proxy card, the Notice and our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee will then recommend June 27, 2014 are available at www.proxyonline.com. Why is Aviat soliciting proxies? In lieu of personally attending and voting at the Annual Meeting, you may appoint a proxy to vote on your behalf. The Board has designated proxy holders to whom you may submit your voting instructions. The proxy holders for the Annual Meeting are Charles Kissner, Chairman of the Board, Michael Pangia, President and CEO, and Meena Elliott, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. How do I revoke my proxy? If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting by: • • • • delivering a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Secretary, Meena Elliott, at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054; signing, dating and returning a proxy card bearing a later date; submitting another proxy by Internet or telephone (the latest dated proxy will control); or attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person by ballot. If you hold your shares in “street name,” you should follow the directions provided by the bank, broker or other holder of record to revoke your proxy. Regardless of how you hold your shares, your attendance at the Annual Meeting after having executed and delivered a valid proxy card will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of your proxy. Who pays for the cost of solicitation? What vote is required to approve each item? • Proposal No. 1 (election of directors): the director nominees will be elected by a plurality. However, Aviat’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for certain procedures if a director nominee fails to receive more “for” votes than “withhold” votes. See “How is the majority voting policy applied to the election of directors?” below. We will bear the entire cost of solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, and mailing of this Proxy Statement, the proxy card, the Notice and any additional solicitation materials that may be furnished to our stockholders and the maintenance and operation of the website providing Internet access to these proxy materials. We will reimburse banks, brokers and other holders of record for reasonable expenses incurred in sending proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock and maintaining Internet access for such materials and the submission of proxies. We may supplement the original solicitation of proxies by mail through solicitation by telephone, email, over the Internet or by other means by our directors, officers and other employees. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services. 2 2 3 Aviat’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for a majority voting policy in uncontested elections of directors. An uncontested election is one in which the number of nominees for director does not exceed the number of directors to be elected. The director election taking place at this Annual Meeting is uncontested, and Aviat’s majority voting policy will apply. Under Aviat’s majority voting policy, in order for a nominee to remain on the Board, the votes cast “for” such nominee’s election must exceed the votes “withheld” from such nominee’s election. Aviat’s majority voting policy requires an incumbent director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his election than votes “for” his election to promptly offer his resignation from the Board for consideration by to the Board the action to be taken with respect to such offer of resignation, and the Board will determine whether to accept the nominee’s resignation. See “Majority Vote Policy in Director Elections” for additional information. What constitutes a quorum, abstention and broker “non-vote”? The presence at the Annual Meeting either in person or by proxy of the holders of common stock entitled to cast a majority of the voting power of all of the common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” are counted as present and are, therefore, included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. An abstention occurs when a stockholder does not vote for or against a proposal but specifically abstains from voting. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a bank, broker or other holder of record holding shares in street name for a beneficial owner signs and submits a proxy or votes with respect to shares of common stock held in a fiduciary capacity, but does not vote on a particular matter because the bank, broker or other holder of record does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that matter and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner or because the bank, broker or other holder of record elects not to vote on a matter as to which it does have discretionary voting power. Under the rules governing banks, brokers and other holders of record who are voting with respect to shares held in street name, such entities have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters but not on non-routine matters. Only Proposal No. 2 is a routine matter. For Proposal No. 1, abstentions and broker “non-votes” will be disregarded and have no effect on the outcome of the vote. For Proposals No. 2 and No. 3, abstentions will have the same effect as voting against the proposal, and broker non-votes, if any, will be disregarded and have no effect on the outcome of the vote. How do I vote? Stockholders of record can vote by proxy as follows: • Via the Internet: Stockholders may submit voting instructions through the Internet by following the instructions included with the proxy card. • By Telephone: Stockholders may submit voting instructions by telephone by following the instructions included • By Mail: Stockholders may sign, date and return their proxy card in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope with the proxy card. provided. Stockholders may not cumulate votes in the election of directors. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” all nominees. • • Proposal No. 2 (ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm): the affirmative vote by the holders of common stock entitled to cast a majority of the voting power of all of the common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is necessary for approval of Proposal No. 2. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal No. 2. Proposal No. 3 (advisory, non-binding vote on named executive officer compensation): the affirmative vote by the holders of common stock entitled to cast a majority of the voting power of all of the common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is necessary for approval of Proposal No. 3. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal No. 3. • At the Annual Meeting: If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person by ballot, even if you have previously returned a proxy card. How is the majority voting policy applied to the election of directors? If you hold your shares in “street name,” the bank, broker or other holder of record holding your shares will send you separate instructions describing the procedure for voting your shares. If you hold your shares in “street name,” you will not be able to vote in person by ballot at the Annual Meeting unless you have previously requested and obtained a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other holder of record and present it at the Annual Meeting. How can I access the proxy materials and annual report on the Internet? This Proxy Statement, the form of proxy card, the Notice and our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 are available at www.proxyonline.com. Why is Aviat soliciting proxies? In lieu of personally attending and voting at the Annual Meeting, you may appoint a proxy to vote on your behalf. The Board has designated proxy holders to whom you may submit your voting instructions. The proxy holders for the Annual Meeting are Charles Kissner, Chairman of the Board, Michael Pangia, President and CEO, and Meena Elliott, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. How do I revoke my proxy? Meeting by: If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before your shares are voted at the Annual • delivering a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Secretary, Meena Elliott, at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054; signing, dating and returning a proxy card bearing a later date; submitting another proxy by Internet or telephone (the latest dated proxy will control); or attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person by ballot. • • • If you hold your shares in “street name,” you should follow the directions provided by the bank, broker or other holder of record to revoke your proxy. Regardless of how you hold your shares, your attendance at the Annual Meeting after having executed and delivered a valid proxy card will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of your proxy. What vote is required to approve each item? • Proposal No. 1 (election of directors): the director nominees will be elected by a plurality. However, Aviat’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for certain procedures if a director nominee fails to receive more “for” votes than “withhold” votes. See “How is the majority voting policy applied to the election of directors?” below. Aviat’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for a majority voting policy in uncontested elections of directors. An uncontested election is one in which the number of nominees for director does not exceed the number of directors to be elected. The director election taking place at this Annual Meeting is uncontested, and Aviat’s majority voting policy will apply. Under Aviat’s majority voting policy, in order for a nominee to remain on the Board, the votes cast “for” such nominee’s election must exceed the votes “withheld” from such nominee’s election. Aviat’s majority voting policy requires an incumbent director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his election than votes “for” his election to promptly offer his resignation from the Board for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee will then recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to such offer of resignation, and the Board will determine whether to accept the nominee’s resignation. See “Majority Vote Policy in Director Elections” for additional information. What constitutes a quorum, abstention and broker “non-vote”? The presence at the Annual Meeting either in person or by proxy of the holders of common stock entitled to cast a majority of the voting power of all of the common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” are counted as present and are, therefore, included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. An abstention occurs when a stockholder does not vote for or against a proposal but specifically abstains from voting. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a bank, broker or other holder of record holding shares in street name for a beneficial owner signs and submits a proxy or votes with respect to shares of common stock held in a fiduciary capacity, but does not vote on a particular matter because the bank, broker or other holder of record does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that matter and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner or because the bank, broker or other holder of record elects not to vote on a matter as to which it does have discretionary voting power. Under the rules governing banks, brokers and other holders of record who are voting with respect to shares held in street name, such entities have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters but not on non-routine matters. Only Proposal No. 2 is a routine matter. For Proposal No. 1, abstentions and broker “non-votes” will be disregarded and have no effect on the outcome of the vote. For Proposals No. 2 and No. 3, abstentions will have the same effect as voting against the proposal, and broker non-votes, if any, will be disregarded and have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Who pays for the cost of solicitation? We will bear the entire cost of solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, and mailing of this Proxy Statement, the proxy card, the Notice and any additional solicitation materials that may be furnished to our stockholders and the maintenance and operation of the website providing Internet access to these proxy materials. We will reimburse banks, brokers and other holders of record for reasonable expenses incurred in sending proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock and maintaining Internet access for such materials and the submission of proxies. We may supplement the original solicitation of proxies by mail through solicitation by telephone, email, over the Internet or by other means by our directors, officers and other employees. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services. 2 3 3 Proxy Statement In addition, the Company has retained AST Phoenix Advisors to assist it in the solicitation of proxies. The Company has agreed to pay D.F. King & Co. a fee of $9,500, plus reimbursement for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The Company has also agreed to indemnify D.F. King & Co. against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities and expenses under the federal securities laws. t n e m e t a t S y x o r P What is the deadline for submitting proposals and director nominations for the 2015 Annual Meeting? In order for any stockholder to submit nominations of directors or propose business to be considered before our 2015 Annual Meeting, a stockholder of record must submit a written notice thereof, which notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting. We will announce the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting at least 70 days in advance. The full requirements for the submission of nominations of directors and proposals of business to be considered are contained in Article II, Sections 13 and 14, respectively, of our Bylaws, which are available for review at our website, www.aviatnetworks.com. Stockholder proposals intended for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) must be directed to the Corporate Secretary, Aviat Networks, Inc., at our principal executive offices, and must be received by September 25, 2015. In accordance with the rules of the SEC, the proxies solicited by the Board for the 2015 Annual Meeting will confer discretionary authority on the proxy holders to vote on any director nomination or stockholder proposal presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting if the Company fails to receive notice of such matter in accordance with the periods specified above. Who will count the votes? D.F. King & Co. will tabulate the votes cast by proxy. The Company has retained an independent inspector of elections in connection with Aviat’s solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. Aviat intends to notify stockholders of the results of the Annual Meeting by filing a Form 8-K with the SEC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE We believe in and are committed to sound corporate governance principles. Consistent with our commitment to and continuing evolution of corporate governance principles, we adopted a Code of Business Ethics, corporate governance guidelines and written charters for the Governance and Nominating Committee, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. Each of our Board committees is required to conduct an annual review of its charter and applicable guidelines. Board Members The authorized size of the Board is currently eight. Directors are nominated by the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. Directors’ Biographies In January 2015, we reconstituted the Board and Clifford H. Higgerson, Raghavendra Rau, Dr. Moshen Sohi and Edward F. Thompson retired from the Board. At that time, James R. Henderson, John Mutch, Robert G. Pearse and John J. Quicke were appointed to the Board. The Board thanks Messrs. Higgerson, Rau and Thompson and Dr. Sohi for their distinguished service to the Company. The following are the members of the Board as of the date of this Proxy Statement. See Proposal No. 1 for additional information regarding the nominees for director. Name Title and Positions Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, Chairman of the Board William A. Hasler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director James R. Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director John Mutch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Michael A. Pangia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, President and Chief Executive Officer Robert G. Pearse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director John J. Quicke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lead Independent Director The Board has determined that each of our current directors except Mr. Kissner and Mr. Pangia has no relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and is otherwise independent in accordance with listing rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market (the “NASDAQ Listing Rules”). All of our directors are requested to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. Seven of our directors serving at that time attended the 2013 Annual Meeting. Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance member served during fiscal year 2014. Board Member Qualifications During fiscal year 2014, the Board held nine meetings. Each of the Board members attended at least 77% of the total number of Board meetings and at least 78% of the total number of meetings of the committee or committees on which the Our Board believes that its members should encompass a range of talents, skills and expertise, which enables the Board to provide sound guidance with respect to the Company’s operations and interest. Our Board prefers a variety of professional experiences and backgrounds among its members. In addition to considering a candidate’s experiences and background, candidates are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board and evolving needs of our businesses. In particular, the Board has sought to include members that have experience in establishing, growing and leading communications companies in senior management positions and serving on the board of directors of other companies. In determining that each of the members of the Board is qualified to be a director, the Board has relied on the attributes listed below and, where applicable, on the direct personal knowledge of each of the members’ prior service on the Board. Our bylaws provide that a director may not be older than 75 years of age on the date of his or her election or appointment to the Board unless otherwise specifically approved by a resolution passed by the Board. The following is a brief description of the business experience and background of each nominee for director, including the capacities in which each has served during at least the past five years: Mr. Charles D. Kissner, age 67, currently serves as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Kissner served as our Executive Chairman from July 2011 to July 2012 and again from July 2014 to December 2014, and served as non-Executive Chairman from July 2012 to July 2014 and again after December 2014. Mr. Kissner served as CEO and Chairman of the Board of Aviat from July 2010 to July 2011. He was CEO of Stratex Networks, Inc., one of our predecessor companies (“Stratex”), from July 1995 through May 2000, and again from October 2001 to May 2006. He was elected a director of Stratex in July 1995 and Chairman in August 1996. Mr. Kissner also served as Vice President and General Manager of M/A-COM, Inc., a manufacturer of radio and microwave communications products, from July 1993 to July 1995. Prior to that, he was President and CEO of Aristacom International Inc. (“Aristacom”), a communications software company, and Executive Vice President and a Director of Fujitsu Network Switching, Inc. He also held a number of executive positions at AT&T (now Alcatel-Lucent). Mr. Kissner currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of ShoreTel, Inc., an IP business telephony systems company. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Meru Networks Inc., a provider of advanced enterprise wireless networking systems, Rambus, Inc., a technology licensing company focusing on the development of technologies that enrich the end-user experience of electronic systems, and KQED Public Media, a non-profit organization. 4 4 5  Director Director Director Director Director Name Title and Positions Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, Chairman of the Board William A. Hasler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . James R. Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . John Mutch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Michael A. Pangia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, President and Chief Executive Officer Robert G. Pearse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . John J. Quicke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lead Independent Director In addition, the Company has retained AST Phoenix Advisors to assist it in the solicitation of proxies. The Company has agreed to pay D.F. King & Co. a fee of $9,500, plus reimbursement for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The Company has also agreed to indemnify D.F. King & Co. against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities and expenses under the federal securities laws. What is the deadline for submitting proposals and director nominations for the 2015 Annual Meeting? In order for any stockholder to submit nominations of directors or propose business to be considered before our 2015 Annual Meeting, a stockholder of record must submit a written notice thereof, which notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting. We will announce the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting at least 70 days in advance. The full requirements for the submission of nominations of directors and proposals of business to be considered are contained in Article II, Sections 13 and 14, respectively, of our Bylaws, which are available for review at our website, www.aviatnetworks.com. Stockholder proposals intended for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) must be directed to the Corporate Secretary, Aviat Networks, Inc., at our principal executive offices, and must be received by September 25, 2015. In accordance with the rules of the SEC, the proxies solicited by the Board for the 2015 Annual Meeting will confer discretionary authority on the proxy holders to vote on any director nomination or stockholder proposal presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting if the Company fails to receive notice of such matter in accordance with the periods specified above. Who will count the votes? CORPORATE GOVERNANCE We believe in and are committed to sound corporate governance principles. Consistent with our commitment to and continuing evolution of corporate governance principles, we adopted a Code of Business Ethics, corporate governance guidelines and written charters for the Governance and Nominating Committee, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. Each of our Board committees is required to conduct an annual review of its charter and applicable guidelines. Board Members Committee of the Board. The authorized size of the Board is currently eight. Directors are nominated by the Governance and Nominating In January 2015, we reconstituted the Board and Clifford H. Higgerson, Raghavendra Rau, Dr. Moshen Sohi and Edward F. Thompson retired from the Board. At that time, James R. Henderson, John Mutch, Robert G. Pearse and John J. Quicke were appointed to the Board. The Board thanks Messrs. Higgerson, Rau and Thompson and Dr. Sohi for their distinguished service to the Company. The following are the members of the Board as of the date of this Proxy Statement. See Proposal No. 1 for additional information regarding the nominees for director. D.F. King & Co. will tabulate the votes cast by proxy. The Company has retained an independent inspector of elections in connection with Aviat’s solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. Aviat intends to notify stockholders of the results of Board Member Qualifications the Annual Meeting by filing a Form 8-K with the SEC. The Board has determined that each of our current directors except Mr. Kissner and Mr. Pangia has no relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and is otherwise independent in accordance with listing rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market (the “NASDAQ Listing Rules”). All of our directors are requested to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. Seven of our directors serving at that time attended the 2013 Annual Meeting. Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance During fiscal year 2014, the Board held nine meetings. Each of the Board members attended at least 77% of the total number of Board meetings and at least 78% of the total number of meetings of the committee or committees on which the member served during fiscal year 2014. Our Board believes that its members should encompass a range of talents, skills and expertise, which enables the Board to provide sound guidance with respect to the Company’s operations and interest. Our Board prefers a variety of professional experiences and backgrounds among its members. In addition to considering a candidate’s experiences and background, candidates are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board and evolving needs of our businesses. In particular, the Board has sought to include members that have experience in establishing, growing and leading communications companies in senior management positions and serving on the board of directors of other companies. In determining that each of the members of the Board is qualified to be a director, the Board has relied on the attributes listed below and, where applicable, on the direct personal knowledge of each of the members’ prior service on the Board. Our bylaws provide that a director may not be older than 75 years of age on the date of his or her election or appointment to the Board unless otherwise specifically approved by a resolution passed by the Board. Directors’ Biographies The following is a brief description of the business experience and background of each nominee for director, including the capacities in which each has served during at least the past five years: Mr. Charles D. Kissner, age 67, currently serves as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Kissner served as our Executive Chairman from July 2011 to July 2012 and again from July 2014 to December 2014, and served as non-Executive Chairman from July 2012 to July 2014 and again after December 2014. Mr. Kissner served as CEO and Chairman of the Board of Aviat from July 2010 to July 2011. He was CEO of Stratex Networks, Inc., one of our predecessor companies (“Stratex”), from July 1995 through May 2000, and again from October 2001 to May 2006. He was elected a director of Stratex in July 1995 and Chairman in August 1996. Mr. Kissner also served as Vice President and General Manager of M/A-COM, Inc., a manufacturer of radio and microwave communications products, from July 1993 to July 1995. Prior to that, he was President and CEO of Aristacom International Inc. (“Aristacom”), a communications software company, and Executive Vice President and a Director of Fujitsu Network Switching, Inc. He also held a number of executive positions at AT&T (now Alcatel-Lucent). Mr. Kissner currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of ShoreTel, Inc., an IP business telephony systems company. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Meru Networks Inc., a provider of advanced enterprise wireless networking systems, Rambus, Inc., a technology licensing company focusing on the development of technologies that enrich the end-user experience of electronic systems, and KQED Public Media, a non-profit organization. 4 5 5 Proxy Statement t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Mr. Kissner brings extensive knowledge of our business, having served on our Board as non-executive Chairman for over three years. He also brings nearly fifteen years of relevant CEO experience having served in that capacity at technology driven companies such as Stratex and Aristacom. Mr. Kissner also brings extensive public company directorship and committee experience to the Board, which has been an invaluable resource as our company regularly assesses its corporate governance, corporate compliance and risk management obligations. Mr. Kissner has also directly supervised nearly thirty merger and acquisition activities, which experience has been vital to the assessment and integration of acquisition opportunities. Mr. William A. Hasler, age 73, has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Globalstar, Inc. (“Globalstar”), a supplier of satellite communication services, and Rubicon, Ltd.(“Rubicon”), which holds subsidiaries focused in forestry biotechnology. Mr. Hasler served as a member of the Stratex Board of Directors from August 2001 through January 2007, and was Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Hasler served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Solectron Corporation from 2003 to 2007 and was a member of that Board from 1998 to 2007. He was co-CEO and a Director of Aphton Corp., a biopharmaceutical company, from 1998 to 2003. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Hasler was Dean of both the Graduate and Undergraduate Schools of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to his deanship at UC Berkeley, Mr. Hasler was Vice Chairman of KPMG Peat Marwick. He also served as a trustee of Schwab Funds. Mr. Hasler’s current and prior service on the boards of several technology-driven companies, including Globalstar and Rubicon, and his prior service as Chairman of a large publicly traded company provide him with an extensive knowledge base of complex management, financial, operational and governance issues faced by public companies with international operations. He is a member of the audit committee of various public and private companies. Mr. Hasler has extensive experience in Silicon Valley companies and this experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to corporate finance and accounting, strategic planning, manufacturing and operations. He brings valuable financial expertise, including extensive knowledge of accounting, auditing and investments in both public and private companies. Additionally, through his service on public company boards, Mr. Hasler has gained an understanding and expertise in public company governance. Mr. James R. Henderson, age 57, has served as a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of School Specialty, in 2004. Mr. Pearse has served as a director for Crossroads Systems, Inc., an intellectual property development company and Inc. (“School Specialty”), a distributor of supplies, furniture and both supplemental and curriculum products to the education marketplace, since June 2013 and served as its Chief Executive Officer from July 2013 to April 2014. From August 2013 to April 2014, Mr. Henderson also served as the interim Chief Executive Officer of School Specialty. Mr. Henderson has been a director of RELM Wireless Corporation, a maker of high-specification two-way communications equipment, since March 2014 and as a director of GenCorp Inc., a technology-based manufacturer of aerospace and defense products and systems, since 2008. Mr. Henderson served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Point Blank Solutions, Inc., a designer and producer of technologically advanced body armor systems, from June 2009 until October 2011, having previously served as its Chairman of the Board from August 2008 until June 2009 and as Acting Chief Executive Officer from April 2009 until June 2009. He subsequently served as Chief Executive Officer of Point Blank Enterprises, Inc., the successor to the business of Point Blank Solutions, Inc., from October 2011 to September 2012. Mr. Henderson was also a Managing Director and operating partner of Steel Partners LLC, a subsidiary of Steel Partners Holdings L.P., until April 2011. In addition, Mr. Henderson was associated with Steel Partners LLC and its affiliates from August 1999 until April 2011. Mr. Henderson served as a director of DGT Holdings Corp., a developer, manufacturer and marketer of medical and dental imaging systems and power conversion subsystems and components (“DGT”), from November 2003 until December 2011, as a director of SL Industries, Inc., a designer, manufacturer and marketer of power electronics, motion control, power protection, power quality electromagnetic and specialized communication equipment, from January 2002 to March 2010 and as a director of Angelica Corporation, a provider of textile rental and linen management services (“Angelica”), from August 2006 to August 2008. Mr. Henderson brings to the Board significant experience as a member of the Boards of Directors of several public President and Chief Executive Officer of DGT and as a director of Angelica, Layne Christensen Company, a global solutions companies. He also has extensive experience as a senior executive at a number of companies. provider for essential natural resources, NOVT Corporation, a vascular brachytherapy business, and H&H. Mr. John Mutch, age 58, has served on the Board of Directors of Steel Excel Inc., a provider of drilling and production Mr. Quicke brings to the Board significant experience as a member of the Boards of Directors of several public services to the oil and gas industry and a provider of event-based sports services and other health-related services (“Steel Excel”), since 2007. From December 2008 to January 2014, he served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Beyondtrust Software, a privately-held security software company. Mr. Mutch has been the founder and managing partner of MV Advisors LLC (“MV Advisors”), a strategic block investment firm that provides focused investment and strategic guidance to small and mid-cap technology companies, since December 2005. Prior to founding MV Advisors, in March 2003, Mr. Mutch was appointed by the U.S. Bankruptcy court to the Board of Directors of Peregrine Systems, Inc. (“Peregrine Systems”), a provider of enterprise asset and service management solutions. He assisted that company in a bankruptcy work-out proceeding and was named President and Chief Executive Officer in July 2003. Previous to running Peregrine Systems, Mr. Mutch served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of HNC Software, an enterprise companies. He also has extensive experience as a senior executive at a number of companies. Dr. James C. Stoffel, age 68, currently serves as our lead independent director and has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. Presently, Dr. Stoffel is on the Board of Directors of Harris Corporation, of which he has been a member since August 2003, and is also a member of its Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee and Corporate Governance Committee. Additionally, he serves as General Partner of Trillium International, LLC, a private equity company, and is a senior advisor to other private equity companies. He also serves on the boards of the following privately held companies:Display Data, Omni-ID Ltd., Quintel Ltd., Clear Momentum and Intrinsiq Ltd. Prior to his retirement, Dr. Stoffel was Senior Vice President, Chief Technical Officer and Director of Research and Development of Eastman Kodak Company 6 6 7 analytics software provider. Before HNC Software, Mr. Mutch spent seven years at Microsoft Corporation in a variety of executive sales and marketing positions. Mr. Mutch previously served on the Boards of Directors of Phoenix Technologies Ltd., a leader in core systems software products, services and embedded technologies, Edgar Online, Inc., a provider of financial data, analytics and disclosure management solutions, Aspyra, Inc., a provider of clinical and diagnostic information systems for the healthcare industry, Overland Storage, Inc., a provider of unified data management and data protection solutions, and Brio Software, Inc., a provider of business intelligence software. He has served as a director at Agilysys, Inc., a provider of information technology solutions, since March 2009. Mr. Mutch brings to the Board extensive experience as an executive in the technology sector. He also has experience as a director at several public companies in the technology sector. He is or has been a member of the audit committee of various public and private companies, and brings valuable financial expertise to the Board. Mr. Michael A Pangia, age 53, has been our President and CEO and a member of the Board since July 18, 2011. From March 2009 to July 2011, he served as our Chief Sales Officer where he was responsible for company-wide operations of the Global Sales and Services organization. Prior to joining Aviat, Mr. Pangia served as senior vice president, Global Sales Operations and Strategy, at Nortel, where he was responsible for all operational aspects of the Global Sales function. Prior to that, he was president of Nortel’s Asia region, where his key responsibilities included sales and overall business management for all countries in the region where Nortel did business. Mr. Pangia’s current and prior service as a senior executive officer with large technology driven companies with international operations provide him with an extensive knowledge base of complex management, financial, operational and governance issues faced by public companies with global operations. He also brings a high level of financial literacy to the Board through both formal education and over 15 years’ experience in multiple finance functional areas, including cost accounting, financial planning and analysis, and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Robert G. Pearse, age 55, currently serves as a Managing Partner at Yucatan Rock Ventures, a firm he co-founded global provider of data storage solutions, since 2013. From 2005 to 2012, Mr. Pearse served as Vice President of Strategy and Market Development at NetApp, Inc., a provider of storage solutions, from 1987 to 2004, Mr. Pearse held leadership positions at Hewlett-Packard, a global technology company, most recently as the vice president of Strategy and Corporate Development from 2001 to 2004. Mr. Pearse’s professional experience also includes positions at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Eastman Chemical Company and General Motors Company. Mr. Pearse brings to the Board extensive operational experience in the technology sector. Mr. John J. Quicke, age 65, has served on the Board of Directors of Steel Excel since 2007 and served as its Interim President and Chief Executive Officer from January 2010 until March 2013. In March 2013, he was named President and Chief Executive Officer of Steel Excel’s Steel Energy segment. Mr. Quicke is a Managing Director and operating partner of Steel Partners LLC, a subsidiary of Steel Partners Holdings L.P. Mr. Quicke has been associated with Steel Partners and its affiliates since September 2005. Previously, Mr. Quicke served in various capacities at Sequa Corporation, a diversified manufacturer, including Vice Chairman and Executive Officer, President, and as a director of the company. Mr. Quicke has served as a director of Rowan Companies, plc, an offshore contract drilling company, since January 2009. He has served as a director of JPS Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of mechanically formed glass and aramid substrate materials for specialty applications, since May 2013. Mr. Quicke also serves as a Vice President of Handy & Harman Ltd. (“H&H”), a diversified manufacturer of engineered niche industrial products, a position he has held since October 2005. Mr. Quicke previously served as a director, Mr. Kissner brings extensive knowledge of our business, having served on our Board as non-executive Chairman for over three years. He also brings nearly fifteen years of relevant CEO experience having served in that capacity at technology driven companies such as Stratex and Aristacom. Mr. Kissner also brings extensive public company directorship and committee experience to the Board, which has been an invaluable resource as our company regularly assesses its corporate governance, corporate compliance and risk management obligations. Mr. Kissner has also directly supervised nearly thirty merger and acquisition activities, which experience has been vital to the assessment and integration of acquisition opportunities. Mr. William A. Hasler, age 73, has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Globalstar, Inc. (“Globalstar”), a supplier of satellite communication services, and Rubicon, Ltd.(“Rubicon”), which holds subsidiaries focused in forestry biotechnology. Mr. Hasler served as a member of the Stratex Board of Directors from August 2001 through January 2007, and was Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Hasler served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Solectron Corporation from 2003 to 2007 and was a member of that Board from 1998 to 2007. He was co-CEO and a Director of Aphton Corp., a biopharmaceutical company, from 1998 to 2003. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Hasler was Dean of both the Graduate and Undergraduate Schools of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to his deanship at UC Berkeley, Mr. Hasler was Vice Chairman of KPMG Peat Marwick. He also served as a trustee of Schwab Funds. Mr. Hasler’s current and prior service on the boards of several technology-driven companies, including Globalstar and Rubicon, and his prior service as Chairman of a large publicly traded company provide him with an extensive knowledge base of complex management, financial, operational and governance issues faced by public companies with international operations. He is a member of the audit committee of various public and private companies. Mr. Hasler has extensive experience in Silicon Valley companies and this experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to corporate finance and accounting, strategic planning, manufacturing and operations. He brings valuable financial expertise, including extensive knowledge of accounting, auditing and investments in both public and private companies. Additionally, through his service on public company boards, Mr. Hasler has gained an understanding and expertise in public company governance. Mr. James R. Henderson, age 57, has served as a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of School Specialty, Inc. (“School Specialty”), a distributor of supplies, furniture and both supplemental and curriculum products to the education marketplace, since June 2013 and served as its Chief Executive Officer from July 2013 to April 2014. From August 2013 to April 2014, Mr. Henderson also served as the interim Chief Executive Officer of School Specialty. Mr. Henderson has been a director of RELM Wireless Corporation, a maker of high-specification two-way communications equipment, since March 2014 and as a director of GenCorp Inc., a technology-based manufacturer of aerospace and defense products and systems, since 2008. Mr. Henderson served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Point Blank Solutions, Inc., a designer and producer of technologically advanced body armor systems, from June 2009 until October 2011, having previously served as its Chairman of the Board from August 2008 until June 2009 and as Acting Chief Executive Officer from April 2009 until June 2009. He subsequently served as Chief Executive Officer of Point Blank Enterprises, Inc., the successor to the business of Point Blank Solutions, Inc., from October 2011 to September 2012. Mr. Henderson was also a Managing Director and operating partner of Steel Partners LLC, a subsidiary of Steel Partners Holdings L.P., until April 2011. In addition, Mr. Henderson was associated with Steel Partners LLC and its affiliates from August 1999 until April 2011. Mr. Henderson served as a director of DGT Holdings Corp., a developer, manufacturer and marketer of medical and dental imaging systems and power conversion subsystems and components (“DGT”), from November 2003 until December 2011, as a director of SL Industries, Inc., a designer, manufacturer and marketer of power electronics, motion control, power protection, power quality electromagnetic and specialized communication equipment, from January 2002 to March 2010 and as a director of Angelica Corporation, a provider of textile rental and linen management services (“Angelica”), from August 2006 to August 2008. Mr. Henderson brings to the Board significant experience as a member of the Boards of Directors of several public companies. He also has extensive experience as a senior executive at a number of companies. analytics software provider. Before HNC Software, Mr. Mutch spent seven years at Microsoft Corporation in a variety of executive sales and marketing positions. Mr. Mutch previously served on the Boards of Directors of Phoenix Technologies Ltd., a leader in core systems software products, services and embedded technologies, Edgar Online, Inc., a provider of financial data, analytics and disclosure management solutions, Aspyra, Inc., a provider of clinical and diagnostic information systems for the healthcare industry, Overland Storage, Inc., a provider of unified data management and data protection solutions, and Brio Software, Inc., a provider of business intelligence software. He has served as a director at Agilysys, Inc., a provider of information technology solutions, since March 2009. Mr. Mutch brings to the Board extensive experience as an executive in the technology sector. He also has experience as a director at several public companies in the technology sector. He is or has been a member of the audit committee of various public and private companies, and brings valuable financial expertise to the Board. Mr. Michael A Pangia, age 53, has been our President and CEO and a member of the Board since July 18, 2011. From March 2009 to July 2011, he served as our Chief Sales Officer where he was responsible for company-wide operations of the Global Sales and Services organization. Prior to joining Aviat, Mr. Pangia served as senior vice president, Global Sales Operations and Strategy, at Nortel, where he was responsible for all operational aspects of the Global Sales function. Prior to that, he was president of Nortel’s Asia region, where his key responsibilities included sales and overall business management for all countries in the region where Nortel did business. Mr. Pangia’s current and prior service as a senior executive officer with large technology driven companies with international operations provide him with an extensive knowledge base of complex management, financial, operational and governance issues faced by public companies with global operations. He also brings a high level of financial literacy to the Board through both formal education and over 15 years’ experience in multiple finance functional areas, including cost accounting, financial planning and analysis, and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Robert G. Pearse, age 55, currently serves as a Managing Partner at Yucatan Rock Ventures, a firm he co-founded in 2004. Mr. Pearse has served as a director for Crossroads Systems, Inc., an intellectual property development company and global provider of data storage solutions, since 2013. From 2005 to 2012, Mr. Pearse served as Vice President of Strategy and Market Development at NetApp, Inc., a provider of storage solutions, from 1987 to 2004, Mr. Pearse held leadership positions at Hewlett-Packard, a global technology company, most recently as the vice president of Strategy and Corporate Development from 2001 to 2004. Mr. Pearse’s professional experience also includes positions at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Eastman Chemical Company and General Motors Company. Mr. Pearse brings to the Board extensive operational experience in the technology sector. Mr. John J. Quicke, age 65, has served on the Board of Directors of Steel Excel since 2007 and served as its Interim President and Chief Executive Officer from January 2010 until March 2013. In March 2013, he was named President and Chief Executive Officer of Steel Excel’s Steel Energy segment. Mr. Quicke is a Managing Director and operating partner of Steel Partners LLC, a subsidiary of Steel Partners Holdings L.P. Mr. Quicke has been associated with Steel Partners and its affiliates since September 2005. Previously, Mr. Quicke served in various capacities at Sequa Corporation, a diversified manufacturer, including Vice Chairman and Executive Officer, President, and as a director of the company. Mr. Quicke has served as a director of Rowan Companies, plc, an offshore contract drilling company, since January 2009. He has served as a director of JPS Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of mechanically formed glass and aramid substrate materials for specialty applications, since May 2013. Mr. Quicke also serves as a Vice President of Handy & Harman Ltd. (“H&H”), a diversified manufacturer of engineered niche industrial products, a position he has held since October 2005. Mr. Quicke previously served as a director, President and Chief Executive Officer of DGT and as a director of Angelica, Layne Christensen Company, a global solutions provider for essential natural resources, NOVT Corporation, a vascular brachytherapy business, and H&H. Mr. John Mutch, age 58, has served on the Board of Directors of Steel Excel Inc., a provider of drilling and production Mr. Quicke brings to the Board significant experience as a member of the Boards of Directors of several public services to the oil and gas industry and a provider of event-based sports services and other health-related services (“Steel Excel”), since 2007. From December 2008 to January 2014, he served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Beyondtrust Software, a privately-held security software company. Mr. Mutch has been the founder and managing partner of MV Advisors LLC (“MV Advisors”), a strategic block investment firm that provides focused investment and strategic guidance to small and mid-cap technology companies, since December 2005. Prior to founding MV Advisors, in March 2003, Mr. Mutch was appointed by the U.S. Bankruptcy court to the Board of Directors of Peregrine Systems, Inc. (“Peregrine Systems”), a provider of enterprise asset and service management solutions. He assisted that company in a bankruptcy work-out proceeding and was named President and Chief Executive Officer in July 2003. Previous to running Peregrine Systems, Mr. Mutch served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of HNC Software, an enterprise companies. He also has extensive experience as a senior executive at a number of companies. Dr. James C. Stoffel, age 68, currently serves as our lead independent director and has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. Presently, Dr. Stoffel is on the Board of Directors of Harris Corporation, of which he has been a member since August 2003, and is also a member of its Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee and Corporate Governance Committee. Additionally, he serves as General Partner of Trillium International, LLC, a private equity company, and is a senior advisor to other private equity companies. He also serves on the boards of the following privately held companies:Display Data, Omni-ID Ltd., Quintel Ltd., Clear Momentum and Intrinsiq Ltd. Prior to his retirement, Dr. Stoffel was Senior Vice President, Chief Technical Officer and Director of Research and Development of Eastman Kodak Company 6 7 7 Proxy Statement(“Kodak”). He held this position from 2000 to April 2005. He joined Kodak in 1997 as Vice President and Director, Electronic Imaging Products Research and Development, and became Director of Research and Engineering in 1998. Prior to joining Kodak, he was with Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”), where he began his career in 1972. His most recent position with Xerox was Vice President, Corporate Research and Technology. Dr. Stoffel serves on the Advisory Board for Research and Graduate Studies at the University of Notre Dame and is a member of the advisory board of the Applied Science and Technology Research Institute, Hong Kong. Dr. Stoffel’s prior service as a senior executive of large, publicly traded, technology driven companies, and his more than 30 years’ experience focused on technology development, provide him with an extensive knowledge of the complex technical research and development, management, financial and governance issues faced by a public company with international operations. This experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to research and development, new product introductions, strategic planning, manufacturing, operations and corporate finance. His experience as an advisor to private equity firms also provides him with additional knowledge related to strategic planning, capital raising, mergers and acquisitions and economic analysis. Dr. Stoffel also has gained an understanding of public company governance and executive compensation through his service on public company boards, including as a lead independent director. t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Board Leadership The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board. The members of the Board possess considerable experience and unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities that the Company faces, and are in the best position to evaluate the needs of the Company and how to best organize the capabilities of the directors and management to meet those needs. When the CEO also serves as Chairman of the Board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for the appointment of a lead independent director. Accordingly, when our Chairman, Charles Kissner, was appointed CEO in June 2010, the Board appointed Dr. Stoffel, an independent director, as lead independent director. Although, currently, the roles of the CEO and the Chairman remain separate, upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has determined to continue the role of the lead independent director for the present time. The lead independent director is responsible for coordinating the activities of the other independent directors and has the authority to preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors. The lead independent director may also recommend the retention of outside advisors and consultants who report directly to the Board. The Board believes that appointing a lead independent director to serve along with a CEO and a non-executive Chairman of the Board has enhanced the Board’s oversight of, and independence from, Company management, the ability of the Board to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of our stockholders and our overall corporate governance. The Board has determined that having Mr. Kissner serve as Chairman is in the best interest of the Company at this time. This structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of the Company and active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing Board priorities and procedures, and is useful in establishing a system of corporate checks and balances. Separating the Chairman position from the CEO position allows the CEO to focus on setting the strategic direction of the Company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman leads the Board in its role of, among other things, providing advice to, and overseeing the performance of, the CEO. In addition, managing the Board can be a time-intensive responsibility, and this structure permits Mr. Pangia, our CEO, to focus on the management of the Company’s day-to-day operations. In January 2015, Mr. Kissner announced that he would step down as Chairman after the Annual Meeting. The Board has selected Mr. Mutch to serve as Chairman after the Annual Meeting. The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight Assessing and managing risk is the responsibility of the management of the Company. The Board, through the Governance and Nominating Committee, oversees and reviews certain aspects of the Company’s risk management efforts, focusing on the adequacy of the Company’s risk management and risk mitigation processes. At the Board’s request, management proposed a process for identifying, evaluating and monitoring material risks and such process has been approved by the Board and is currently in effect. This risk management program is overseen by senior management who, in connection with their regular review of the overall business, identify and prioritize a broad range of material risks (e.g., financial, strategic, compliance and operational). Senior management also discusses mitigation plans to address such material risks. Prioritized risks and management’s plans for mitigating such risks are regularly presented to the full Board for discussion and in order to ensure monitoring. In addition to the risk management program, the Board encourages management to promote a corporate culture that incorporates risk management into the Company’s corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. A discussion of risk factors in the Company’s compensation design can be found below under the heading “Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program.” Principles of Corporate Governance, Bylaws and Other Governance Documents The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance documents that supplement certain provisions of our Bylaws and relate to, among other things, the composition, structure, interaction and operation of the Board. Some of the key governance features of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Bylaws and other governance documents are summarized below. Majority Vote Policy in Director Elections. Aviat’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any nominee for director in an uncontested election (i.e., an election where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected) who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his election than votes “for” such election must, promptly following certification of the stockholder vote, offer his resignation to the Board for consideration in accordance with the following procedures. All of these procedures will be completed within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. The Board, through its Qualified Independent Directors (as defined below), will evaluate the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and decide the action to be taken with respect to such offered resignation, which can include, without limitation: (i) accepting the resignation; (ii) accepting the resignation effective as of a future date not later than 180 days following certification of the stockholder vote; (iii) rejecting the resignation but addressing what the Qualified Independent Directors believe to be the underlying cause of the withhold votes; (iv) rejecting the resignation but resolving that the director will not be re-nominated in the future for election; or (v) rejecting the resignation. In reaching their decision, the Qualified Independent Directors will consider all factors they deem relevant, including but not limited to: (i) any stated reasons why stockholders withheld votes from such director; (ii) the extent to which the “withhold” votes exceed the votes “for” the election of the director and whether the “withhold” votes represent a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock; (iii) any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes; (iv) the director’s tenure; (v) the director’s qualifications; (vi) the director’s past and expected future contributions to the Company; (vii) the overall composition of the Board, including whether accepting the resignation would cause the Company to fail or potentially fail to comply with any applicable law, rule or regulation of the SEC or the NASDAQ Listing Rules; and (viii) whether such director’s continued service on the Board for a specified period of time is appropriate in light of current or anticipated events involving the Company. Following the Board’s determination, the Company will, within four business days, disclose publicly in a document furnished or filed with the SEC the Board’s decision as to whether or not to accept the resignation offer. The disclosure will also include a description of the process by which the decision was reached, including, if applicable, the reason or reasons for rejecting the offered resignation. A director who is required to offer his or her resignation in accordance with this policy may not be present during the deliberations or voting whether to accept his or her resignation or, except as otherwise provided below, a resignation offered by any other director in accordance with this policy. Prior to voting, the Qualified Independent Directors may afford the affected director an opportunity to provide any information or statement that he or she deems relevant. For purposes of this policy, “Qualified Independent Directors” means all directors who (i) are independent directors (as defined in accordance with the NASDAQ Listing Rules); and (ii) are not required to offer their resignation in connection with an election in accordance with this majority voting policy. If there are fewer than three independent directors then serving on the Board who are not required to offer their resignations in accordance with this majority voting policy, then the Qualified Independent Directors means all of the independent directors, and each independent director who is required to offer his resignation in accordance with this majority voting policy must recuse himself from the deliberations and voting only with respect to his individual offer to resign. All nominees for election as a director in an uncontested election are deemed to have agreed to abide by this majority voting policy and will offer to resign and will resign if requested to do so in accordance with this majority voting policy (and 8 8 9 (“Kodak”). He held this position from 2000 to April 2005. He joined Kodak in 1997 as Vice President and Director, Electronic Imaging Products Research and Development, and became Director of Research and Engineering in 1998. Prior to joining Kodak, he was with Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”), where he began his career in 1972. His most recent position with Xerox was Vice President, Corporate Research and Technology. Dr. Stoffel serves on the Advisory Board for Research and Graduate Studies at the University of Notre Dame and is a member of the advisory board of the Applied Science and Technology Research Institute, Hong Kong. Dr. Stoffel’s prior service as a senior executive of large, publicly traded, technology driven companies, and his more than 30 years’ experience focused on technology development, provide him with an extensive knowledge of the complex technical research and development, management, financial and governance issues faced by a public company with international operations. This experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to research and development, new product introductions, strategic planning, manufacturing, operations and corporate finance. His experience as an advisor to private equity firms also provides him with additional knowledge related to strategic planning, capital raising, mergers and acquisitions and economic analysis. Dr. Stoffel also has gained an understanding of public company governance and executive compensation through his service on public company boards, including as a lead independent director. Board Leadership The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board. The members of the Board possess considerable experience and unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities that the Company faces, and are in the best position to evaluate the needs of the Company and how to best organize the capabilities of the directors and management to meet those needs. When the CEO also serves as Chairman of the Board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for the appointment of a lead independent director. Accordingly, when our Chairman, Charles Kissner, was appointed CEO in June 2010, the Board appointed Dr. Stoffel, an independent director, as lead independent director. Although, currently, the roles of the CEO and the Chairman remain separate, upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has determined to continue the role of the lead independent director for the present time. The lead independent director is responsible for coordinating the activities of the other independent directors and has the authority to preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors. The lead independent director may also recommend the retention of outside advisors and consultants who report directly to the Board. The Board believes that appointing a lead independent director to serve along with a CEO and a non-executive Chairman of the Board has enhanced the Board’s oversight of, and independence from, Company management, the ability of the Board to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of our stockholders and our overall corporate governance. The Board has determined that having Mr. Kissner serve as Chairman is in the best interest of the Company at this time. This structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of the Company and active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing Board priorities and procedures, and is useful in establishing a system of corporate checks and balances. Separating the Chairman position from the CEO position allows the CEO to focus on setting the strategic direction of the Company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman leads the Board in its role of, among other things, providing advice to, and overseeing the performance of, the CEO. In addition, managing the Board can be a time-intensive responsibility, and this structure permits Mr. Pangia, our CEO, to focus on the management of the Company’s day-to-day operations. In January 2015, Mr. Kissner announced that he would step down as Chairman after the Annual Meeting. The Board has selected Mr. Mutch to serve as Chairman after the Annual Meeting. The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight Assessing and managing risk is the responsibility of the management of the Company. The Board, through the Governance and Nominating Committee, oversees and reviews certain aspects of the Company’s risk management efforts, focusing on the adequacy of the Company’s risk management and risk mitigation processes. At the Board’s request, management proposed a process for identifying, evaluating and monitoring material risks and such process has been approved by the Board and is currently in effect. This risk management program is overseen by senior management who, in connection with their regular review of the overall business, identify and prioritize a broad range of material risks (e.g., financial, strategic, compliance and operational). Senior management also discusses mitigation plans to address such material risks. Prioritized risks and management’s plans for mitigating such risks are regularly presented to the full Board for discussion and in order to ensure monitoring. In addition to the risk management program, the Board encourages management to promote a corporate culture that incorporates risk management into the Company’s corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. A discussion of risk factors in the Company’s compensation design can be found below under the heading “Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program.” Principles of Corporate Governance, Bylaws and Other Governance Documents The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance documents that supplement certain provisions of our Bylaws and relate to, among other things, the composition, structure, interaction and operation of the Board. Some of the key governance features of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Bylaws and other governance documents are summarized below. Majority Vote Policy in Director Elections. Aviat’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any nominee for director in an uncontested election (i.e., an election where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected) who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his election than votes “for” such election must, promptly following certification of the stockholder vote, offer his resignation to the Board for consideration in accordance with the following procedures. All of these procedures will be completed within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. The Board, through its Qualified Independent Directors (as defined below), will evaluate the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and decide the action to be taken with respect to such offered resignation, which can include, without limitation: (i) accepting the resignation; (ii) accepting the resignation effective as of a future date not later than 180 days following certification of the stockholder vote; (iii) rejecting the resignation but addressing what the Qualified Independent Directors believe to be the underlying cause of the withhold votes; (iv) rejecting the resignation but resolving that the director will not be re-nominated in the future for election; or (v) rejecting the resignation. In reaching their decision, the Qualified Independent Directors will consider all factors they deem relevant, including but not limited to: (i) any stated reasons why stockholders withheld votes from such director; (ii) the extent to which the “withhold” votes exceed the votes “for” the election of the director and whether the “withhold” votes represent a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock; (iii) any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes; (iv) the director’s tenure; (v) the director’s qualifications; (vi) the director’s past and expected future contributions to the Company; (vii) the overall composition of the Board, including whether accepting the resignation would cause the Company to fail or potentially fail to comply with any applicable law, rule or regulation of the SEC or the NASDAQ Listing Rules; and (viii) whether such director’s continued service on the Board for a specified period of time is appropriate in light of current or anticipated events involving the Company. Following the Board’s determination, the Company will, within four business days, disclose publicly in a document furnished or filed with the SEC the Board’s decision as to whether or not to accept the resignation offer. The disclosure will also include a description of the process by which the decision was reached, including, if applicable, the reason or reasons for rejecting the offered resignation. A director who is required to offer his or her resignation in accordance with this policy may not be present during the deliberations or voting whether to accept his or her resignation or, except as otherwise provided below, a resignation offered by any other director in accordance with this policy. Prior to voting, the Qualified Independent Directors may afford the affected director an opportunity to provide any information or statement that he or she deems relevant. For purposes of this policy, “Qualified Independent Directors” means all directors who (i) are independent directors (as defined in accordance with the NASDAQ Listing Rules); and (ii) are not required to offer their resignation in connection with an election in accordance with this majority voting policy. If there are fewer than three independent directors then serving on the Board who are not required to offer their resignations in accordance with this majority voting policy, then the Qualified Independent Directors means all of the independent directors, and each independent director who is required to offer his resignation in accordance with this majority voting policy must recuse himself from the deliberations and voting only with respect to his individual offer to resign. All nominees for election as a director in an uncontested election are deemed to have agreed to abide by this majority voting policy and will offer to resign and will resign if requested to do so in accordance with this majority voting policy (and 8 9 9 Proxy Statement will if requested submit an irrevocable resignation letter, subject to this majority voting policy, as a condition to being nominated for election). In January 2015, the Board reconstituted the membership of its committees as follows: t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Prohibition Against Pledging Aviat Securities and Hedging Transactions. In accordance with Aviat’s Code of Conduct, directors and executive officers are prohibited from pledging Aviat securities and engaging in hedging transactions with respect to Aviat securities. Aviat specifically prohibits directors and executive officers from holding Aviat securities in any margin account for investment purposes or otherwise using Aviat securities as collateral for a loan. Such persons are also prohibited from purchasing certain instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, and collars) and engaging in transactions designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the value of Aviat securities. Board Committees The Board maintains an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Governance and Nominating Committee. Copies of the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee are available on our website at www.investors.aviatnetworks.com/documents.cfm. The following table shows, for fiscal year 2014, the Chairman and members of each committee, the number of committee meetings held and the principal functions performed by each committee. Committee Audit . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of Meetings in Fiscal Year 2014 19 Members Edward F. Thompson* William A. Hasler Raghavendra Rau Principal Functions • Selects our independent registered public accounting firm • Reviews reports of our independent registered public accounting firm • Reviews and pre-approves the scope and cost of all services, including all non-audit services, provided by the firm selected to conduct the audit • Monitors the effectiveness of the audit process • Reviews management’s assessment of the adequacy of financial reporting and operating controls • Monitors corporate compliance program Compensation . . . . . Governance and Nominating . . . . . 4 5 Dr. James C. Stoffel* Clifford H. Higgerson Dr. Mohsen Sohi • Reviews our executive compensation policies and strategies • Oversees and evaluates our overall compensation structure and programs William A. Hasler* James C. Stoffel Clifford H. Higgerson • Develops and implements policies and practices relating to corporate governance • Reviews and monitors implementation of our policies and procedures • Reviews the process by which management identifies and mitigates key areas of risk and reviews critical risk areas with the Board • Assists in developing criteria for open positions on the Board • Reviews and recommends nominees for election of directors to the Board • Reviews and recommends policies, if needed for selection of candidates for directors ______________________ * Chairman of Committee Audit Committee Governance and Nominating Committee Compensation Committee John J. Quicke* Robert G. Pearse William A. Hasler Dr. James C. Stoffel* John J. Quicke Robert G. Pearse John Mutch* James R. Henderson William A. Hasler ______________________ * Chairman of Committee Audit Committee The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for selecting, and approving the services performed by, our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as reviewing our accounting practices, corporate financial reporting and system of internal controls over financial reporting. During fiscal year 2014, the Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. Thompson (Chairman), Hasler and Rau. No material amendments to the Audit Committee Charter were made during fiscal year 2014. During fiscal year 2014, the Audit Committee was comprised of independent, non-employee members of our Board who were “financially sophisticated” under the NASDAQ Listing Rules. For fiscal year 2014, the Board has determined that each of Messrs. Thompson and Hasler qualified as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under Item 407(d)(5)(i) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act. Following the reconstitution of the Board, the Board determined that each of Messrs. Hasler and Mutch qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.” Such status does not impose on any director duties, liabilities or obligations that are greater than the duties, liabilities or obligations otherwise imposed on a director as members of our Audit Committee and the Board. Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee has the authority and responsibility to approve our overall executive compensation strategy, to administer our annual and long-term compensation plans and to review and make recommendations to the Board regarding executive compensation. The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rules. During fiscal year 2014, the Compensation Committee utilized Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) as an independent, third-party consulting firm. Compensation Committee Interlock and Insider Participation During fiscal year 2014, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Stoffel (Chairman), Higgerson and Sohi. None of these individuals was an officer or employee or former officer of the Company. None of our executive officers currently serves or in the past year has served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee. Governance and Nominating Committee During fiscal year 2014, the Governance and Nominating Committee consisted of Messrs. Hasler (Chairman), Higgerson and Stoffel. Each member of the Governance and Nominating Committee met the independence requirements of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Governance and Nominating Committee develops and implements policies and practices related to corporate governance consistent with sound corporate governance principles. The Governance and Nominating Committee also reviews the process by which management identifies and mitigates key areas of risk and reviews critical risk areas with the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee also recommends candidates to the Board and periodically reviews whether a more formal selection policy should be adopted. There is no difference in the manner in which the committee members evaluate nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder. We currently do not pay a third party to identify or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees, although we may in the future utilize the services of such third parties. 10 10 11 will if requested submit an irrevocable resignation letter, subject to this majority voting policy, as a condition to being In January 2015, the Board reconstituted the membership of its committees as follows: Prohibition Against Pledging Aviat Securities and Hedging Transactions. In accordance with Aviat’s Code of Conduct, directors and executive officers are prohibited from pledging Aviat securities and engaging in hedging transactions with respect to Aviat securities. Aviat specifically prohibits directors and executive officers from holding Aviat securities in any margin account for investment purposes or otherwise using Aviat securities as collateral for a loan. Such persons are also prohibited from purchasing certain instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, and collars) and engaging in transactions designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the value of Aviat securities. nominated for election). Board Committees The Board maintains an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Governance and Nominating Committee. Copies of the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee are available on our website at www.investors.aviatnetworks.com/documents.cfm. The following table shows, for fiscal year 2014, the Chairman and members of each committee, the number of committee meetings held and the principal functions performed by each committee. Committee Members Principal Functions Audit . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward F. Thompson* • Selects our independent registered public accounting William A. Hasler Raghavendra Rau firm • Reviews reports of our independent registered public accounting firm • Reviews and pre-approves the scope and cost of all services, including all non-audit services, provided by the firm selected to conduct the audit • Monitors the effectiveness of the audit process • Reviews management’s assessment of the adequacy of financial reporting and operating controls • Monitors corporate compliance program Compensation . . . . . • Reviews our executive compensation policies and Dr. James C. Stoffel* Clifford H. Higgerson Dr. Mohsen Sohi strategies • Oversees and evaluates our overall compensation structure and programs Governance and Nominating . . . . . William A. Hasler* James C. Stoffel Clifford H. Higgerson • Develops and implements policies and practices relating to corporate governance • Reviews and monitors implementation of our policies and procedures Number of Meetings in Fiscal Year 2014 19 4 5 • Reviews the process by which management identifies and mitigates key areas of risk and reviews critical risk areas with the Board • Assists in developing criteria for open positions on the Board • Reviews and recommends nominees for election of directors to the Board • Reviews and recommends policies, if needed for selection of candidates for directors ______________________ * Chairman of Committee Audit Committee Governance and Nominating Committee Compensation Committee John J. Quicke* Robert G. Pearse William A. Hasler Dr. James C. Stoffel* John J. Quicke Robert G. Pearse John Mutch* James R. Henderson William A. Hasler ______________________ * Chairman of Committee Audit Committee The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for selecting, and approving the services performed by, our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as reviewing our accounting practices, corporate financial reporting and system of internal controls over financial reporting. During fiscal year 2014, the Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. Thompson (Chairman), Hasler and Rau. No material amendments to the Audit Committee Charter were made during fiscal year 2014. During fiscal year 2014, the Audit Committee was comprised of independent, non-employee members of our Board who were “financially sophisticated” under the NASDAQ Listing Rules. For fiscal year 2014, the Board has determined that each of Messrs. Thompson and Hasler qualified as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under Item 407(d)(5)(i) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act. Following the reconstitution of the Board, the Board determined that each of Messrs. Hasler and Mutch qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.” Such status does not impose on any director duties, liabilities or obligations that are greater than the duties, liabilities or obligations otherwise imposed on a director as members of our Audit Committee and the Board. Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee has the authority and responsibility to approve our overall executive compensation strategy, to administer our annual and long-term compensation plans and to review and make recommendations to the Board regarding executive compensation. The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rules. During fiscal year 2014, the Compensation Committee utilized Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) as an independent, third-party consulting firm. Compensation Committee Interlock and Insider Participation During fiscal year 2014, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Stoffel (Chairman), Higgerson and Sohi. None of these individuals was an officer or employee or former officer of the Company. None of our executive officers currently serves or in the past year has served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee. Governance and Nominating Committee During fiscal year 2014, the Governance and Nominating Committee consisted of Messrs. Hasler (Chairman), Higgerson and Stoffel. Each member of the Governance and Nominating Committee met the independence requirements of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Governance and Nominating Committee develops and implements policies and practices related to corporate governance consistent with sound corporate governance principles. The Governance and Nominating Committee also reviews the process by which management identifies and mitigates key areas of risk and reviews critical risk areas with the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee also recommends candidates to the Board and periodically reviews whether a more formal selection policy should be adopted. There is no difference in the manner in which the committee members evaluate nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder. We currently do not pay a third party to identify or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees, although we may in the future utilize the services of such third parties. 10 11 11 Proxy Statement DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS The form and amount of director compensation is reviewed and assessed from time to time by the Compensation Committee with changes, if any, recommended to the Board for action. Director compensation may take the form of cash, equity, and other benefits ordinarily available to directors. Directors who are not employees of ours received the following fees, as applicable, for their services on our Board during fiscal year 2014: • $60,000 basic annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, which a director may elect to receive in the form of shares of common stock; • $18,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as the lead independent director of our Board; • • Nominating Committee; Committee; $10,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Audit Committee; $5,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Governance and • $8,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Compensation • Annual grant of restricted shares of common stock valued (based on market prices on the date of grant) at $30,000, with 100% vesting in one year, subject to continuing service as a director; and • Annual grant of options to purchase common stock valued (based on U.S. GAAP (as defined below) values of the options on the date of grant) at $30,000, with an exercise price per share equal to the market price on the date of grant and with 100% vesting in one year, subject to continuing service as a director. During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Kissner received $130,000 for services provided concerning strategic transactions and investor relations, and was not paid a cash retainer in connection with this service as a director or as Chairman. Directors are eligible to defer payment of all or a portion of the retainer fees and restricted stock awards that are payable to them. Directors may choose either a lump sum or installment distribution of such fees and awards. Installment distributions are payable in annual installments over a period no longer than 10 years. We reimburse each non-employee director for reasonable travel expenses incurred and in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings on our behalf, and for expenses such as supplies and continuing director education costs, including travel for one course per year. Employee directors are not compensated for service as a director. In reviewing potential candidates for the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers the individual’s experience and background. Candidates for the position of director should exhibit proven leadership capabilities, high integrity, exercise high level responsibilities within their chosen career, and possess an ability to quickly grasp complex principles of business, finance, international transactions and communications technologies. In general, candidates who have held an established executive level position in business, finance, law, education, research, government or civic activity will be preferred. Although the Governance and Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy with regard to the selection of director nominees, diversity is one of the factors that the committee considers in identifying director nominees. When identifying and recommending director nominees, the Governance and Nominating Committee views diversity expansively to include, without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other qualities or attributes that contribute to board diversity. As part of this process, the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates how a particular candidate would strengthen and increase the diversity of the Board in terms of how that candidate may contribute to the Board’s overall balance of perspectives, backgrounds, knowledge, experience, skill sets and expertise in substantive matters pertaining to the Company’s business. t n e m e t a t S y x o r P In making its recommendations, the Governance and Nominating Committee bears in mind that the foremost responsibility of a director of a corporation is to represent the interests of the stockholders as a whole. The Governance and Nominating Committee intends to continue to evaluate candidates for election to the Board on the basis of the foregoing criteria. Stockholder Communications with the Board Stockholders who wish to communicate directly with the Board may do so by submitting a comment via the Company’s website at www.investors.aviatnetworks.com/contactBoard.cfm or by sending a letter addressed to: Aviat Networks, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054. The Corporate Secretary monitors these communications and provides a summary of all received messages to the Board at its regularly scheduled meetings. When warranted by the nature of communications, the Corporate Secretary will request prompt attention by the appropriate committee or independent director of the Board, independent advisors or management. The Corporate Secretary may decide in her judgment whether a response to any stockholder communication is appropriate. Code of Conduct We implemented our Code of Conduct effective January 26, 2007. All of our employees, including the CEO, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer, are required to abide by the Code of Conduct to help ensure that our business is conducted in a consistently ethical and legal manner. The Audit Committee has adopted a written policy, and management has implemented a reporting system, intended to encourage our employees to bring to the attention of management and the Audit Committee any complaints regarding the integrity of our internal system of controls over financial reporting, or the accuracy or completeness of financial or other information related to our financial statements. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS During fiscal year 2014, we believe there were no transactions, or series of similar transactions, to which we were or are to be a party in which the amount exceeded $120,000, and in which any of our directors or executive officers, any holders of more than 5% of our common stock or any members of any such person’s immediate family, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation described in the sections titled “Director Compensation and Benefits” and “Executive Compensation.” It is the policy and practice of our Board to review and assess information concerning transactions involving related persons. Related persons include our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members. If the determination is made that a related person has a material interest in a transaction involving us, then the disinterested members of our Board would review and approve or ratify it, and we would disclose the transaction in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. If the related person is a member of our Board, or a family member of a director, then that director would not participate in any discussion involving the transaction at issue. Our Code of Conduct prohibits all employees, including our executive officers, from benefiting personally from any transactions with us other than approved compensation benefits. 12 12 13 In reviewing potential candidates for the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers the individual’s experience and background. Candidates for the position of director should exhibit proven leadership capabilities, high integrity, exercise high level responsibilities within their chosen career, and possess an ability to quickly grasp complex principles of business, finance, international transactions and communications technologies. In general, candidates who have held an established executive level position in business, finance, law, education, research, government or civic activity will be preferred. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS The form and amount of director compensation is reviewed and assessed from time to time by the Compensation Committee with changes, if any, recommended to the Board for action. Director compensation may take the form of cash, equity, and other benefits ordinarily available to directors. Directors who are not employees of ours received the following fees, as applicable, for their services on our Board Although the Governance and Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy with regard to the during fiscal year 2014: • • • • • $60,000 basic annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, which a director may elect to receive in the form of shares of common stock; $18,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as the lead independent director of our Board; $10,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Audit Committee; $5,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee; $8,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Compensation Committee; • Annual grant of restricted shares of common stock valued (based on market prices on the date of grant) at $30,000, with 100% vesting in one year, subject to continuing service as a director; and • Annual grant of options to purchase common stock valued (based on U.S. GAAP (as defined below) values of the options on the date of grant) at $30,000, with an exercise price per share equal to the market price on the date of grant and with 100% vesting in one year, subject to continuing service as a director. During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Kissner received $130,000 for services provided concerning strategic transactions and investor relations, and was not paid a cash retainer in connection with this service as a director or as Chairman. Directors are eligible to defer payment of all or a portion of the retainer fees and restricted stock awards that are payable to them. Directors may choose either a lump sum or installment distribution of such fees and awards. Installment distributions are payable in annual installments over a period no longer than 10 years. We reimburse each non-employee director for reasonable travel expenses incurred and in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings on our behalf, and for expenses such as supplies and continuing director education costs, including travel for one course per year. Employee directors are not compensated for service as a director. selection of director nominees, diversity is one of the factors that the committee considers in identifying director nominees. When identifying and recommending director nominees, the Governance and Nominating Committee views diversity expansively to include, without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other qualities or attributes that contribute to board diversity. As part of this process, the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates how a particular candidate would strengthen and increase the diversity of the Board in terms of how that candidate may contribute to the Board’s overall balance of perspectives, backgrounds, knowledge, experience, skill sets and expertise in substantive matters pertaining to the Company’s business. In making its recommendations, the Governance and Nominating Committee bears in mind that the foremost responsibility of a director of a corporation is to represent the interests of the stockholders as a whole. The Governance and Nominating Committee intends to continue to evaluate candidates for election to the Board on the basis of the foregoing criteria. Stockholder Communications with the Board Stockholders who wish to communicate directly with the Board may do so by submitting a comment via the Company’s website at www.investors.aviatnetworks.com/contactBoard.cfm or by sending a letter addressed to: Aviat Networks, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054. The Corporate Secretary monitors these communications and provides a summary of all received messages to the Board at its regularly scheduled meetings. When warranted by the nature of communications, the Corporate Secretary will request prompt attention by the appropriate committee or independent director of the Board, independent advisors or management. The Corporate Secretary may decide in her judgment whether a response to any stockholder communication is appropriate. Code of Conduct We implemented our Code of Conduct effective January 26, 2007. All of our employees, including the CEO, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer, are required to abide by the Code of Conduct to help ensure that our business is conducted in a consistently ethical and legal manner. The Audit Committee has adopted a written policy, and management has implemented a reporting system, intended to encourage our employees to bring to the attention of management and the Audit Committee any complaints regarding the integrity of our internal system of controls over financial reporting, or the accuracy or completeness of financial or other information related to our financial statements. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS During fiscal year 2014, we believe there were no transactions, or series of similar transactions, to which we were or are to be a party in which the amount exceeded $120,000, and in which any of our directors or executive officers, any holders of more than 5% of our common stock or any members of any such person’s immediate family, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation described in the sections titled “Director Compensation and Benefits” and “Executive Compensation.” It is the policy and practice of our Board to review and assess information concerning transactions involving related persons. Related persons include our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members. If the determination is made that a related person has a material interest in a transaction involving us, then the disinterested members of our Board would review and approve or ratify it, and we would disclose the transaction in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. If the related person is a member of our Board, or a family member of a director, then that director would not participate in any discussion involving the transaction at issue. Our Code of Conduct prohibits all employees, including our executive officers, from benefiting personally from any transactions with us other than approved compensation benefits. 12 13 13 Proxy StatementFiscal Year 2014 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors Our non-employee directors received the following aggregate amounts of compensation in respect of fiscal year 2014. Indemnification t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Name William A. Hasler . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson . Charles D. Kissner. . . . Raghavendra Rau . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel. . . Edward F. Thompson. . ___________________ Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (1) Stock Awards (2) Option Awards (2) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Changes in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings All Other Compensation ($) 65,000 60,000 130,000 60,000 60,000 86,000 70,000 ($) 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 ($) 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 ($) ($) ($) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total ($) 123,492 118,492 188,492 118,492 118,492 144,492 128,492 (1) (2) During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Kissner received $130,000 for services provided concerning strategic transactions and investor relations, and was not paid a cash retainer in connection with this service as a director or as Chairman. The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards and option awards granted to our non-employee directors computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in determining the fair values of our stock awards and option awards are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our fiscal year 2014 Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, as filed with the SEC on December 22, 2014. As of June 27, 2014, our non-employee directors held the following numbers of unvested restricted shares of common stock and stock options, all of which were granted under the 2007 Plan: Name William A. Hasler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raghavendra Rau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward F. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unvested Stock Awards Unvested Option Awards 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 Our Bylaws require us to indemnify each of our directors and officers with respect to their activities as a director, officer, or employee of ours, or when serving at our request as a director, officer, or trustee of another corporation, trust, or other enterprise, against losses and expenses (including attorney fees, judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement) incurred by them in any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, to which they are, or are threatened to be made, a party(ies) as a result of their service to us. In addition, we carry directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which includes similar coverage for our directors and executive officers. We will indemnify each such director or officer for any one or a combination of the following, whichever is most advantageous to such director or officer: • The benefits provided by our Bylaws in effect on the date of the indemnification agreement or at the time expenses are incurred by the director or officer; • The benefits allowable under Delaware law in effect on the date the indemnification bylaw was adopted, or as such law may be amended; • The benefits available under liability insurance obtained by us; and • Such benefits as may otherwise be available to the director or officer under our existing practices. Under our Bylaws, each director or officer will continue to be indemnified even after ceasing to occupy a position as an officer, director, employee or agent of ours with respect to suits or proceedings arising from his or her service with us. 14 14 15 Fiscal Year 2014 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors Our non-employee directors received the following aggregate amounts of compensation in respect of fiscal year 2014. Indemnification Our Bylaws require us to indemnify each of our directors and officers with respect to their activities as a director, officer, or employee of ours, or when serving at our request as a director, officer, or trustee of another corporation, trust, or other enterprise, against losses and expenses (including attorney fees, judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement) incurred by them in any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, to which they are, or are threatened to be made, a party(ies) as a result of their service to us. In addition, we carry directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which includes similar coverage for our directors and executive officers. We will indemnify each such director or officer for any one or a combination of the following, whichever is most advantageous to such director or officer: • The benefits provided by our Bylaws in effect on the date of the indemnification agreement or at the time expenses are incurred by the director or officer; • The benefits allowable under Delaware law in effect on the date the indemnification bylaw was adopted, or as such law may be amended; • The benefits available under liability insurance obtained by us; and • Such benefits as may otherwise be available to the director or officer under our existing practices. Under our Bylaws, each director or officer will continue to be indemnified even after ceasing to occupy a position as an officer, director, employee or agent of ours with respect to suits or proceedings arising from his or her service with us. Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (1) Stock Awards (2) Option Awards (2) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Compensation Earnings All Other Compensation ($) ($) ($) Name William A. Hasler . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson . Charles D. Kissner. . . . Raghavendra Rau . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel. . . Edward F. Thompson. . ___________________ ($) 65,000 60,000 130,000 60,000 60,000 86,000 70,000 ($) 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 ($) 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 Changes in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total ($) 123,492 118,492 188,492 118,492 118,492 144,492 128,492 — — — — — — — (1) During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Kissner received $130,000 for services provided concerning strategic transactions and investor relations, and was not paid a cash retainer in connection with this service as a director or as Chairman. (2) The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards and option awards granted to our non-employee directors computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in determining the fair values of our stock awards and option awards are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our fiscal year 2014 Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, as filed with the SEC on December 22, 2014. As of June 27, 2014, our non-employee directors held the following numbers of unvested restricted shares of common stock and stock options, all of which were granted under the 2007 Plan: Name William A. Hasler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raghavendra Rau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward F. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unvested Stock Unvested Option Awards Awards 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 14 15 15 Proxy Statement SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT (2) Shares of common stock that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days are deemed to be outstanding and t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Except as noted below, the following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of November 18, 2014 by each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than 5 percent of our common stock, by our directors, by our named executive officers and by all our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons listed in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the beneficial owners identified is c/o Aviat Networks, Inc., 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054. As of November 18, 2014, there were 62,223,790 shares of our common stock outstanding. Shares Beneficially Owned as of November 18, 2014(1) Number of Shares of Common Stock(2) Percentage of Voting Power of Common Stock Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Steel Partners Holdings L.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,020,865 (3) 12.89% 590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor New York, NY PENN Capital Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,665,602 (4) 5.89% Navy Yard Corporate Center Three Crescent Drive, Suite 400 Philadelphia, PA 19112 Schneider Capital Management Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,654,866 (5) 5.87% 460 E. Swedesford Road, Suite 2000 Wayne, PA 19087 Dimensional Fund Advisors LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,558,261 (6) 5.72% Palisades West, Building One 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One Austin, TX 78746 Royce & Associates, LLC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,484,244 (7) 5.60% 745 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10151 Named Executive Officers and Directors Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . William A. Hasler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . James R. Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . John Mutch. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331,514 (8) 199,124 (9) 784,246 (10) — (11) 805,583 (12) 408,035 (13) 100,000 (11) Michael Pangia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,113,516 (14) Robert G. Pearse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . John J. Quicke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Michael Shahbazian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,000 (11) — (11) 44,444 (15) 190,436 (16) 425,787 (17) * * 1.25% * 1.29% * * 1.77% * * * * * All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,412,685 (18) 6.80% __________________________ * Less than one percent (1) Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules and regulations of the SEC, and generally includes voting or dispositive power with respect to such shares. beneficially owned by that person for the purpose of computing the total number of shares beneficially owned by that person and the percentage ownership of that person, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person or group. Accordingly, the amounts in the table include shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of November 18, 2014 by the exercise (3) Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 5 to the Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on November 10, 2014 by Steel Excel Inc., Steel Partners Holdings L.P., SPH Group LLC, SPH Group Holdings LLC and Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc. Each of the foregoing entities reported shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of of stock options. such shares. (4) Based solely on a review of the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013 by PENN Capital Management. PENN Capital Management reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all such shares. (5) Based solely on a review of the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 by Schneider Capital Management Corporation. Schneider Capital Management Corporation reported sole voting power with respect to 3,630,240 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. (6) Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2014 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reported sole voting power with respect to 3,449,131 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all such shares. (7) Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 2 to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 6, 2015 by Royce & Associates, LLC. Royce & Associates, LLC reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all such shares. (8) Includes 231,882 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of November 18, 2014. (9) Includes 118,745 shares of common stock that are subject to option or restricted stock units that may be exercised or that will vest within 60 days of November 18, 2014. (10) Includes 550,987 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Information is as of January 12, 2015. (11) (12) Includes 360,561 shares of common stock that are subject to option or restricted stock units that may be exercised or that will vest within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 239,041 shares of common stock held by, or in trusts for, members of Mr. Kissner’s family. Mr. Kissner disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in trust. (13) Includes 276,472 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of (14) Includes 722,939 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of (15) Information is as of January 12, 2015. Represents restricted stock units that will vest within 60 days of January 12, (16) Includes 118,745 shares of common stock that are subject to option or restricted stock units that may be exercised or that will vest within 60 days of November 18, 2014. (17) Includes 308,807 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of November 18, 2014. November 18, 2014. 2015. November 18, 2014. (18) Includes 2,689,138 shares of common stock that are subject to option or restricted stock units that may be exercised or that will vest within 60 days of November 18, 2014. 16 16 17 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) Shares of common stock that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by that person for the purpose of computing the total number of shares beneficially owned by that person and the percentage ownership of that person, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person or group. Accordingly, the amounts in the table include shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of November 18, 2014 by the exercise of stock options. Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 5 to the Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on November 10, 2014 by Steel Excel Inc., Steel Partners Holdings L.P., SPH Group LLC, SPH Group Holdings LLC and Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc. Each of the foregoing entities reported shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. Based solely on a review of the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013 by PENN Capital Management. PENN Capital Management reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all such shares. Based solely on a review of the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 by Schneider Capital Management Corporation. Schneider Capital Management Corporation reported sole voting power with respect to 3,630,240 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2014 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reported sole voting power with respect to 3,449,131 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all such shares. Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 2 to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 6, 2015 by Royce & Associates, LLC. Royce & Associates, LLC reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all such shares. Includes 231,882 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 118,745 shares of common stock that are subject to option or restricted stock units that may be exercised or that will vest within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 550,987 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Information is as of January 12, 2015. Includes 360,561 shares of common stock that are subject to option or restricted stock units that may be exercised or that will vest within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 239,041 shares of common stock held by, or in trusts for, members of Mr. Kissner’s family. Mr. Kissner disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in trust. Includes 276,472 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 722,939 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Information is as of January 12, 2015. Represents restricted stock units that will vest within 60 days of January 12, 2015. Includes 118,745 shares of common stock that are subject to option or restricted stock units that may be exercised or that will vest within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 308,807 shares of common stock that are subject to option that may be exercised within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 2,689,138 shares of common stock that are subject to option or restricted stock units that may be exercised or that will vest within 60 days of November 18, 2014. 1717 Proxy StatementREPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES t n e m e t a t S y x o r P For fiscal year 2014, the Audit Committee consisted of three members of the Board, each of whom was independent of the Company and its management, as defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Board has adopted, and periodically reviews, the Audit Committee charter. The charter specifies the scope of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities and how it carries out those responsibilities. The Audit Committee reviews management’s procedures for the design, implementation, and maintenance of a comprehensive system of internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures focused on the accuracy of our financial statements and the integrity of our financial reporting systems. The Audit Committee provides the Board with the results of its examinations and recommendations and reports to the Board as it may deem necessary to make the Board aware of significant financial matters requiring the attention of the Board. The Audit Committee does not conduct auditing reviews or procedures. The Audit Committee monitors management’s activities and discusses with management the appropriateness and sufficiency of our financial statements and system of internal control over financial reporting. Management has primary responsibility for the Company’s financial statements, the overall reporting process and our system of internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm audits the financial statements prepared by management, expresses an opinion as to whether those financial statements fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and discusses with the Audit Committee any issues they believe should be raised with us. The Audit Committee reviews reports from our independent registered public accounting firm with respect to their annual audit and approves in advance all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee also considers, in advance of the provision of any non-audit services by our independent registered public accounting firm, whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining their independence. In accordance with its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements for the year ended June 27, 2014 and the process designed to achieve compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Audit Committee has also discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and letter from KPMG LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence, including whether KPMG LLP’s provision of non-audit services is compatible with its independence. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended June 27, 2014 be included in Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Audit Committee of the Board of Directors William A. Hasler KPMG LLP has been approved by our Audit Committee to act as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 27, 2014. Representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting , will have opportunity to make a statement should they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. Audit and other fees billed to us for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 are as follows: Audit Fees(3). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,989,380 $ 1,428,917 Audit-Related Fees(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax Fees(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All Other Fees(6). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 104,356 10,000 7,500 64,185 — Total Fees for Services Provided. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,103,736 $ 1,500,602 Fiscal Year 2014(2) Fiscal Year 2013(1) ________________________ (1) On September 6, 2012, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of KPMG LLP as its new independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending June 28, 2013. The appointment of KPMG LLP was ratified by our stockholders at our 2012 Annual Meeting held on November 13, 2012. (2) Includes the following fees billed to us by KPMG LLP for the period June 27, 2014 through December 19, 2014: audit fees totaling $1,488,698 and tax fees totaling $16,601. (3) Audit fees include fees associated with the annual audit, as well as reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, SEC registration statements, accounting and reporting consultations and statutory audits required internationally for our subsidiaries. (4) (5) (6) Fees. Audit-related fees include fees for completion of certain statutory registration requirements. Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance and tax planning services. Other fees include fees billed for other services rendered not included within Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees or Tax KPMG LLP did not perform any professional services related to financial information systems design and implementation for us in fiscal year 2014 or fiscal year 2013. The Audit Committee has determined in its business judgment that the provision of non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP's independence. Information regarding our principal accountant fees and services will appear in our definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. 18 18 19 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES For fiscal year 2014, the Audit Committee consisted of three members of the Board, each of whom was independent of the Company and its management, as defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Board has adopted, and periodically reviews, the Audit Committee charter. The charter specifies the scope of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities and how it carries out those responsibilities. The Audit Committee reviews management’s procedures for the design, implementation, and maintenance of a comprehensive system of internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures focused on the accuracy of our financial statements and the integrity of our financial reporting systems. The Audit Committee provides the Board with the results of its examinations and recommendations and reports to the Board as it may deem necessary to make the Board aware of significant financial matters requiring the attention of the Board. The Audit Committee does not conduct auditing reviews or procedures. The Audit Committee monitors management’s activities and discusses with management the appropriateness and sufficiency of our financial statements and system of internal control over financial reporting. Management has primary responsibility for the Company’s financial statements, the overall reporting process and our system of internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm audits the financial statements prepared by management, expresses an opinion as to whether those financial statements fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and discusses with the Audit Committee any issues they believe should be raised with us. The Audit Committee reviews reports from our independent registered public accounting firm with respect to their annual audit and approves in advance all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee also considers, in advance of the provision of any non-audit services by our independent registered public accounting firm, whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining their independence. In accordance with its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements for the year ended June 27, 2014 and the process designed to achieve compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Audit Committee has also discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees” issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and letter from KPMG LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence, including whether KPMG LLP’s provision of non-audit services is compatible with its independence. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended June 27, 2014 be included in Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Audit Committee of the Board of Directors William A. Hasler KPMG LLP has been approved by our Audit Committee to act as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 27, 2014. Representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting , will have opportunity to make a statement should they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. Audit and other fees billed to us for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 are as follows: Audit Fees(3). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Audit-Related Fees(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax Fees(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All Other Fees(6). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Fees for Services Provided. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________ Fiscal Year 2014(2) 2,989,380 $ Fiscal Year 2013(1) 1,428,917 $ — 104,356 10,000 7,500 64,185 — $ 3,103,736 $ 1,500,602 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) On September 6, 2012, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of KPMG LLP as its new independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending June 28, 2013. The appointment of KPMG LLP was ratified by our stockholders at our 2012 Annual Meeting held on November 13, 2012. Includes the following fees billed to us by KPMG LLP for the period June 27, 2014 through December 19, 2014: audit fees totaling $1,488,698 and tax fees totaling $16,601. Audit fees include fees associated with the annual audit, as well as reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, SEC registration statements, accounting and reporting consultations and statutory audits required internationally for our subsidiaries. Audit-related fees include fees for completion of certain statutory registration requirements. Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance and tax planning services. Other fees include fees billed for other services rendered not included within Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees or Tax Fees. KPMG LLP did not perform any professional services related to financial information systems design and implementation for us in fiscal year 2014 or fiscal year 2013. The Audit Committee has determined in its business judgment that the provision of non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP's independence. Information regarding our principal accountant fees and services will appear in our definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. 18 19 19 Proxy Statement EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Compensation Discussion and Analysis Overview and Summary t n e m e t a t S y x o r P This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which has been prepared by management, is intended to help our stockholders understand our executive compensation philosophy, objectives, elements, policies, practices, and decisions. It is also intended to provide context for the compensation information for our CEO, CFO and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (our “named executive officers”) detailed in the Summary Compensation Table below and in the other tables and narrative discussion that follow. To understand our approach to executive compensation, you should read the entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis that follows. The following brief summary introduces the major topics covered: • • • • • • the cornerstone of our executive compensation program is pay for performance. Accordingly, while we pay competitive base salaries and other benefits, the majority of our named executive officers’ compensation opportunity is based on variable pay. the objectives of our executive compensation program are to reward superior performance, motivate our executives to achieve our goals and attract and retain a world-class management team. the Compensation Committee oversees our compensation program. The Compensation Committee makes most executive compensation decisions, but also makes recommendations on certain aspects of the program to the full Board. The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors. In its work, the Compensation Committee is assisted by independent compensation consultants engaged by the Compensation Committee. in reviewing the elements of our executive compensation program — base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives and post-termination compensation — our Compensation Committee reviews market data from similar companies. our competitive positioning philosophy is to set compensation at the 50th percentile of compensation at peer group companies with allowances for internal factors such as tenure, individual performances and the specific importance of the job to the Company. our annual incentive program is based on specific Company financial performance goals for the fiscal year, and includes provisions to “claw back” any excess amounts paid in the event of a later correction or restatement of our financial statements. The Company believes the compensation program for the named executive officers supported our strategic priorities and aligned compensation earned with the Company’s financial performance in fiscal year 2014. Moreover, we believe that in emphasizing long term stockholder value creation over short term operating results the structure of our executive compensation program has benefited our Company. Executive Compensation Process Compensation Governance Best Practices The Compensation Committee believes that a demonstrated commitment to best practices in compensation governance comprised solely of independent directors, reviews and approves the features and design of our executive compensation is itself an essential component of our approach to executive compensation. The following practices are some examples of this commitment: • Pay for Performance: A substantial portion of our executives’ compensation opportunity is tied to achieving specified corporate objectives. In fiscal year 2014, for example, 100% of the awards made to our executive officers under the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) were performance based and at-risk, subject to achievement of earnings per share (“EPS”) objectives. Under the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), 100% of fiscal year 2014 equity awards were in the form of stock options, which provide no value to our executives if our share price does not increase above the exercise price and vest ratably over three years, reinforcing the long-term focus of our executive compensation programs. 20 20 21 • Mix of short term and long-term compensation: Short term compensation for our executive officers is comprised of base salaries and the AIP, which pays out only to the extent that the Company meets its financial targets. Long term compensation is composed of stock options which vest over a three year period. • Independent Compensation Consultant: The Compensation Committee directly retains the services of Pearl Meyer, an independent compensation consultant, to advise it in determining reasonable and market-based compensation policies. • Prohibition on hedging: Our executive officers, together with all other employees, are prohibited from engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities. • No perquisites: Our executive officers are not provided with club memberships, personal use of corporate aircraft or any other perquisite or special benefits other than our occasional provision of relocation expense reimbursement. • No single trigger change of control acceleration: All change of control arrangements with our executive officers provide for acceleration of vesting for outstanding equity awards only in the event that we are both subject to a change in control and the executive officer’s employment terminates thereafter for specified reasons. • Strong compensation risk management: The Compensation Committee reviews and analyzes the risk profile of our compensation programs and practices at least annually. The primary objectives of our total executive compensation program are to recruit, retain, and develop exceptional executives, incentivize those individuals to achieve strategic, operational, and financial goals, rewarding superior performance and aligning the long term interests of our executives with our stockholders. The following principles guide our overall Compensation Philosophy and Objectives compensation program: • reward superior performance; • motivate our executives to achieve strategic, operational, and financial goals; • • enable us to attract and retain a world-class management team; and align outcomes and rewards with stockholder expectations. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the executive compensation program to ensure our executive compensation policies and programs remain appropriately aligned with evolving business needs and to consider best compensation practices. Our executive compensation programs are reviewed to ensure that they achieve a balance between providing strong retention and performance incentives to our executives while accommodating a meaningful and continuing effort to manage both the Company’s share burn rate and the dilutive effects of equity awards to the Company’s stockholders. The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and implementing executive compensation policies and programs in a manner consistent with our compensation objectives and principles. The Compensation Committee, which is program, and approves the compensation levels, individual bonus objectives and total compensation targets for our executive officers other than our CEO. The Board approves the compensation level, individual bonus objectives, and financial targets for our CEO. The Compensation Committee also monitors executive succession planning and monitors our performance as it relates to overall compensation policies for employees, including benefit and savings plans. In discharging its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee may engage outside consultants and consult with our Human Resources Department as well as internal and external legal or accounting advisors, as the Compensation Committee determines to be appropriate. The Compensation Committee considers recommendations from our CEO and senior management when making decisions regarding our executive compensation program and compensation of our executive officers. Following each fiscal year end, our CEO, assisted by our Human Resources Department, assesses the performance of all named executive officers and other officers. Following this annual performance review process, our CEO recommends base EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Compensation Discussion and Analysis Overview and Summary This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which has been prepared by management, is intended to help our stockholders understand our executive compensation philosophy, objectives, elements, policies, practices, and decisions. It is also intended to provide context for the compensation information for our CEO, CFO and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (our “named executive officers”) detailed in the Summary Compensation Table below and in the other tables and narrative discussion that follow. To understand our approach to executive compensation, you should read the entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis that follows. The following brief summary introduces the major topics covered: • the cornerstone of our executive compensation program is pay for performance. Accordingly, while we pay competitive base salaries and other benefits, the majority of our named executive officers’ compensation opportunity is based on variable pay. • the objectives of our executive compensation program are to reward superior performance, motivate our executives to achieve our goals and attract and retain a world-class management team. • the Compensation Committee oversees our compensation program. The Compensation Committee makes most executive compensation decisions, but also makes recommendations on certain aspects of the program to the full Board. The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors. In its work, the Compensation Committee is assisted by independent compensation consultants engaged by the Compensation Committee. • Mix of short term and long-term compensation: Short term compensation for our executive officers is comprised of base salaries and the AIP, which pays out only to the extent that the Company meets its financial targets. Long term compensation is composed of stock options which vest over a three year period. • Independent Compensation Consultant: The Compensation Committee directly retains the services of Pearl Meyer, an independent compensation consultant, to advise it in determining reasonable and market-based compensation policies. • Prohibition on hedging: Our executive officers, together with all other employees, are prohibited from engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities. • No perquisites: Our executive officers are not provided with club memberships, personal use of corporate aircraft or any other perquisite or special benefits other than our occasional provision of relocation expense reimbursement. • No single trigger change of control acceleration: All change of control arrangements with our executive officers provide for acceleration of vesting for outstanding equity awards only in the event that we are both subject to a change in control and the executive officer’s employment terminates thereafter for specified reasons. • Strong compensation risk management: The Compensation Committee reviews and analyzes the risk profile of our compensation programs and practices at least annually. Compensation Philosophy and Objectives The primary objectives of our total executive compensation program are to recruit, retain, and develop exceptional executives, incentivize those individuals to achieve strategic, operational, and financial goals, rewarding superior performance and aligning the long term interests of our executives with our stockholders. The following principles guide our overall compensation program: • in reviewing the elements of our executive compensation program — base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives and post-termination compensation — our Compensation Committee reviews market data from similar • reward superior performance; companies. • our competitive positioning philosophy is to set compensation at the 50th percentile of compensation at peer group companies with allowances for internal factors such as tenure, individual performances and the specific importance of the job to the Company. • our annual incentive program is based on specific Company financial performance goals for the fiscal year, and includes provisions to “claw back” any excess amounts paid in the event of a later correction or restatement of our financial statements. The Company believes the compensation program for the named executive officers supported our strategic priorities and aligned compensation earned with the Company’s financial performance in fiscal year 2014. Moreover, we believe that in emphasizing long term stockholder value creation over short term operating results the structure of our executive compensation program has benefited our Company. Compensation Governance Best Practices The Compensation Committee believes that a demonstrated commitment to best practices in compensation governance is itself an essential component of our approach to executive compensation. The following practices are some examples of this commitment: • Pay for Performance: A substantial portion of our executives’ compensation opportunity is tied to achieving specified corporate objectives. In fiscal year 2014, for example, 100% of the awards made to our executive officers under the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) were performance based and at-risk, subject to achievement of earnings per share (“EPS”) objectives. Under the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), 100% of fiscal year 2014 equity awards were in the form of stock options, which provide no value to our executives if our share price does not increase above the exercise price and vest ratably over three years, reinforcing the long-term focus of our executive compensation programs. • motivate our executives to achieve strategic, operational, and financial goals; • • enable us to attract and retain a world-class management team; and align outcomes and rewards with stockholder expectations. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the executive compensation program to ensure our executive compensation policies and programs remain appropriately aligned with evolving business needs and to consider best compensation practices. Our executive compensation programs are reviewed to ensure that they achieve a balance between providing strong retention and performance incentives to our executives while accommodating a meaningful and continuing effort to manage both the Company’s share burn rate and the dilutive effects of equity awards to the Company’s stockholders. Executive Compensation Process The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and implementing executive compensation policies and programs in a manner consistent with our compensation objectives and principles. The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, reviews and approves the features and design of our executive compensation program, and approves the compensation levels, individual bonus objectives and total compensation targets for our executive officers other than our CEO. The Board approves the compensation level, individual bonus objectives, and financial targets for our CEO. The Compensation Committee also monitors executive succession planning and monitors our performance as it relates to overall compensation policies for employees, including benefit and savings plans. In discharging its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee may engage outside consultants and consult with our Human Resources Department as well as internal and external legal or accounting advisors, as the Compensation Committee determines to be appropriate. The Compensation Committee considers recommendations from our CEO and senior management when making decisions regarding our executive compensation program and compensation of our executive officers. Following each fiscal year end, our CEO, assisted by our Human Resources Department, assesses the performance of all named executive officers and other officers. Following this annual performance review process, our CEO recommends base 20 21 21 Proxy Statement salary and incentive and equity awards for our named executive officers and other officers to the Compensation Committee. Based on input from our CEO and management, as well as from independent consultants, if any are used, and, in the case of the CEO’s compensation, the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the CEO’s performance, the Compensation Committee determines what changes, if any, should be made to the executive compensation program and either sets or recommends to the full Board the level of each compensation element for all of our officers. t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Independent Compensation Consultant for Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to engage the services of outside advisors, experts and others to assist it. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has hired Pearl Meyer as an independent consultant to advise the Compensation Committee on matters related to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. All services that Pearl Meyer provided Aviat in fiscal year 2014 were approved by the Compensation Committee and were related to executive or Board compensation. Pearl Meyer provides an annual review of the Company’s compensation practices, reviews and makes recommendations regarding the compensation peer groups, and provides independent input to the Compensation Committee on programs and practices. Compensation Committee Advisor Independence The Compensation Committee has considered the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules and related SEC rules finalized in 2012, and has found no conflict of interest in Pearl Meyer continuing to provide advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is also regularly advised by the Company’s primary outside counsel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (“WSGR”). Pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules and related SEC rules finalized in 2012, the Compensation Committee has found no conflict of interest in WSGR continuing to provide advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee intends to reassess the independence of its advisors at least annually. Consideration of Say on Pay Results We conducted our advisory vote on executive compensation last year at our annual meeting. Although this vote was not binding on the Board or us, we believe that it is important for our stockholders to have an opportunity to express their views regarding our executive compensation philosophy, program and practices as disclosed in our proxy statement on an annual basis. The Board and our Compensation Committee value stockholders’ opinions and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the compensation of our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are warranted or appropriate. At our 2013 Annual Meeting, 93.85% of the votes cast on the advisory vote on executive compensation supported our named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement. Our Compensation Committee reviewed the favorable results of this advisory vote, noting the widespread support from our stockholders. Although none of our Compensation Committee’s subsequent actions or decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers were directly attributable to the results of the vote, our Compensation Committee took the vote outcome into consideration in the course of its deliberations. Our Compensation Committee believes that stockholder feedback and concerns on executive compensation matters should be considered as part of its deliberations and intends to consider the results of future advisory votes in its compensation review process. Competitive Benchmarking Our compensation program for all of our officers is addressed in the context of competitive compensation practices. Our management and Compensation Committee consider external data to assist in benchmarking total target compensation. For fiscal year 2014, targets for total cash and cash based compensation (base salary and short-term incentive), long-term incentives and total direct compensation (base salary and short-term and long-term incentives) for all officers were set based on data collected from our peer group companies (for Messrs. Pangia, Hayes and Stumpe) and from a published survey source, the Radford Global Technology Survey for our other named executive officers . In considering data from the Radford Global Technology Survey , we focused on results for technology companies with annual revenues of less than $500 million. The peer group companies selected for benchmarking are reflective of our market for executive talent and business line competitors. Also, the overall composition of the peer group reflects companies of similar complexity and size to us. For fiscal year 2014, these peer group companies included: ADTRAN Inc. Bel Fuse, Inc. Calix, Inc. Harmonic Inc. Ixia Extreme Networks, Inc. Riverbed Technology, Inc. Symmetricom, Inc. Comtech Telecommunications Corp. Aruba Networks, Inc. Black Box Corp. Finisar Corp. Infinera Corp. Plantronics Inc. Sonus Networks, Inc. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the appropriateness of the comparison group used for assessing the compensation of our CEO and other named executive officers. Modifications to the peer group since fiscal year 2013 included removal of Loral Space & Communications, Inc. following the divestiture of its principal subsidiary Space Systems/Loral, removal of Opnext, Inc. following its acquisition by Oclaro, removal of PowerWave Technologies following its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in January 2013, and removal of NETGEAR, Inc. and ViaSat, Inc. in recognition that these two companies had become dissimilar to us in size. We also added Bel Fuse, Inc. and Infinera Corp. to replace these removals and also to better align the revenue size of each of our peer group companies with our own. Data for our peer group companies was collected directly from these companies’ proxy statements. Total Compensation Elements Our executive compensation program includes four major elements: base salary annual cash incentive • • • • long-term compensation — equity incentives post-termination compensation Each named executive officer’s performance is measured against factors such as long and short-term strategic goals and financial measures of our performance, including factors such as revenue, operating income, cash flow from operations and earnings per share. Our compensation policy and practice is to target total compensation levels for all officers, including our named executive officers, nominally at the 50th percentile for similar positions as derived from the market composite data, assuming experience in the position and competent performance. The Compensation Committee may decide to target total compensation above or below the 50th percentile for similar positions in unique circumstances based on an individual’s background, experience, or position. Though compensation levels may differ among our named executive officers based upon competitive factors and the role, responsibilities and performance of each named executive officer, there are no material differences in our compensation policies or in the manner in which total direct compensation opportunity is determined for any of our named executive officers. Because our CEO has significantly greater duties, responsibilities and accountabilities than our other named executive officers, the total compensation opportunity for the CEO is higher than for our other named executive officers. In determining CEO and other named executive officer compensation, the Board also considers the ratio between our CEO’s compensation and the average compensation of our other named executive officers as compared with similar ratios for peer group companies. For fiscal year 2014, that ratio was 1.97, compared to a median ratio of 1.37 in the peer group companies. Base Salary Base salaries are provided as compensation for day-to-day responsibilities and services to us. Executive salaries are reviewed annually. Our CEO generally makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee in August of each year regarding the base pay of each named executive officer (other than himself). The Compensation Committee considers each executive officer’s responsibilities, as well as the Company’s performance and recommended increases in base salary for select named executive officers and other officers. In fiscal year 2014, the CEO recommended and the Compensation Committee 22 22 23 salary and incentive and equity awards for our named executive officers and other officers to the Compensation Committee. Based on input from our CEO and management, as well as from independent consultants, if any are used, and, in the case of the CEO’s compensation, the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the CEO’s performance, the Compensation Committee determines what changes, if any, should be made to the executive compensation program and either sets or recommends to the full Board the level of each compensation element for all of our officers. Independent Compensation Consultant for Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to engage the services of outside advisors, experts and others to assist it. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has hired Pearl Meyer as an independent consultant to advise the Compensation Committee on matters related to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. All services that Pearl Meyer provided Aviat in fiscal year 2014 were approved by the Compensation Committee and were related to executive or Board compensation. Pearl Meyer provides an annual review of the Company’s compensation practices, reviews and makes recommendations regarding the compensation peer groups, and provides independent input to the Compensation Committee on programs and practices. Compensation Committee Advisor Independence The Compensation Committee has considered the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules and related SEC rules finalized in 2012, and has found no conflict of interest in Pearl Meyer continuing to provide advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is also regularly advised by the Company’s primary outside counsel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (“WSGR”). Pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules and related SEC rules finalized in 2012, the Compensation Committee has found no conflict of interest in WSGR continuing to provide advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee intends to reassess the independence of its advisors at least annually. Consideration of Say on Pay Results We conducted our advisory vote on executive compensation last year at our annual meeting. Although this vote was not binding on the Board or us, we believe that it is important for our stockholders to have an opportunity to express their views regarding our executive compensation philosophy, program and practices as disclosed in our proxy statement on an annual basis. The Board and our Compensation Committee value stockholders’ opinions and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the compensation of our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are warranted or appropriate. At our 2013 Annual Meeting, 93.85% of the votes cast on the advisory vote on executive compensation supported our named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement. Our Compensation Committee reviewed the favorable results of this advisory vote, noting the widespread support from our stockholders. Although none of our Compensation Committee’s subsequent actions or decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers were directly attributable to the results of the vote, our Compensation Committee took the vote outcome into consideration in the course of its deliberations. Our Compensation Committee believes that stockholder feedback and concerns on executive compensation matters should be considered as part of its deliberations and intends to consider the results of future advisory votes in its compensation review process. Competitive Benchmarking Our compensation program for all of our officers is addressed in the context of competitive compensation practices. Our management and Compensation Committee consider external data to assist in benchmarking total target compensation. For fiscal year 2014, targets for total cash and cash based compensation (base salary and short-term incentive), long-term incentives and total direct compensation (base salary and short-term and long-term incentives) for all officers were set based on data collected from our peer group companies (for Messrs. Pangia, Hayes and Stumpe) and from a published survey source, the Radford Global Technology Survey for our other named executive officers . In considering data from the Radford Global Technology Survey , we focused on results for technology companies with annual revenues of less than $500 million. The peer group companies selected for benchmarking are reflective of our market for executive talent and business line competitors. Also, the overall composition of the peer group reflects companies of similar complexity and size to us. For fiscal year 2014, these peer group companies included: ADTRAN Inc. Bel Fuse, Inc. Calix, Inc. Extreme Networks, Inc. Harmonic Inc. Ixia Riverbed Technology, Inc. Symmetricom, Inc. Aruba Networks, Inc. Black Box Corp. Comtech Telecommunications Corp. Finisar Corp. Infinera Corp. Plantronics Inc. Sonus Networks, Inc. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the appropriateness of the comparison group used for assessing the compensation of our CEO and other named executive officers. Modifications to the peer group since fiscal year 2013 included removal of Loral Space & Communications, Inc. following the divestiture of its principal subsidiary Space Systems/Loral, removal of Opnext, Inc. following its acquisition by Oclaro, removal of PowerWave Technologies following its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in January 2013, and removal of NETGEAR, Inc. and ViaSat, Inc. in recognition that these two companies had become dissimilar to us in size. We also added Bel Fuse, Inc. and Infinera Corp. to replace these removals and also to better align the revenue size of each of our peer group companies with our own. Data for our peer group companies was collected directly from these companies’ proxy statements. Total Compensation Elements Our executive compensation program includes four major elements: • • • • base salary annual cash incentive long-term compensation — equity incentives post-termination compensation Each named executive officer’s performance is measured against factors such as long and short-term strategic goals and financial measures of our performance, including factors such as revenue, operating income, cash flow from operations and earnings per share. Our compensation policy and practice is to target total compensation levels for all officers, including our named executive officers, nominally at the 50th percentile for similar positions as derived from the market composite data, assuming experience in the position and competent performance. The Compensation Committee may decide to target total compensation above or below the 50th percentile for similar positions in unique circumstances based on an individual’s background, experience, or position. Though compensation levels may differ among our named executive officers based upon competitive factors and the role, responsibilities and performance of each named executive officer, there are no material differences in our compensation policies or in the manner in which total direct compensation opportunity is determined for any of our named executive officers. Because our CEO has significantly greater duties, responsibilities and accountabilities than our other named executive officers, the total compensation opportunity for the CEO is higher than for our other named executive officers. In determining CEO and other named executive officer compensation, the Board also considers the ratio between our CEO’s compensation and the average compensation of our other named executive officers as compared with similar ratios for peer group companies. For fiscal year 2014, that ratio was 1.97, compared to a median ratio of 1.37 in the peer group companies. Base Salary Base salaries are provided as compensation for day-to-day responsibilities and services to us. Executive salaries are reviewed annually. Our CEO generally makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee in August of each year regarding the base pay of each named executive officer (other than himself). The Compensation Committee considers each executive officer’s responsibilities, as well as the Company’s performance and recommended increases in base salary for select named executive officers and other officers. In fiscal year 2014, the CEO recommended and the Compensation Committee 22 23 23 Proxy Statement approved, that named executive base salaries be held flat at fiscal year 2013 levels. Additional details concerning the compensation for our named executive officers for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. encourage share ownership and maintain a direct link between our executive compensation program and the value and appreciation in the value of our stock. Annual Incentive t n e m e t a t S y x o r P The short-term incentive element of our executive compensation program is currently comprised of our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”). The CEO reviews his recommendations for each named executive officer with the Compensation Committee, taking into account benchmarked market data obtained from Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant. Based on recommendations by the CEO, and as specified in any applicable employment agreement, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board an annual incentive compensation target, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each executive officer in August. Each named executive officer’s target annual incentive percentage is benchmarked against the 50th percentile within the market composite for his or her specific role. The Compensation Committee also recommends to the Board specific Company financial performance measures and targets including the relative weighting and payout thresholds. The financial targets are aligned with our Board-approved annual operating plan, and during the year periodic reports are made to the Board about our performance compared with the targets. Under the AIP, a significant portion of the executive’s annual compensation is tied directly to our financial performance. The target amount of annual incentive compensation under our AIP, expressed as a percentage of base salary, generally increases with an executive’s level of management responsibility. AIP target incentive can represent up to 100% of the base cash compensation for our named executive officers and may be paid in the form of cash, stock or a combination of the two. If performance results meet target levels, our executives can earn up to a maximum of 100% of their target incentive. No incentive can be earned for performance below the minimum threshold. Equity awards under the AIP are granted under the 2007 Plan. For fiscal year 2014, the AIP provided for a cash payout and contained minimum, target and maximum performance thresholds based on the performance measures, using EPS as the performance metric. The threshold amounts were established in August 2013, and the plan provided for no payout if the minimum threshold was not met, a 50% payout if the minimum threshold was met and a 100% payout if the target was achieved. If the maximum target threshold was met, the plan was capped at 150% payout. The EPS performance thresholds for fiscal year 2014 were based on a non-GAAP measure that excluded share-based compensation, amortization of purchased technology, transactional tax assessments, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, excess and obsolete inventory writedowns associated with legacy products, costs related to liquidation of foreign subsidiaries, property plant and equipment impairment charges, adjustments to the pro forma tax rate, non-recurring income and other non-recurring charges. Table 1 Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan Metric Tiers Results-Driven Entitlement Performance Payout (As % of Financial Target) (As % of Award Target) Earnings Per Share Minimum Threshold. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Target . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maximum Threshold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50% 100% 150% 50% 100% 150% In fiscal year 2014, the AIP did not guarantee payout of the target amounts, and the Compensation Committee considered the EPS performance thresholds to be challenging. During the 2014 fiscal year, we did not achieve the minimum threshold target for AIP awards; therefore, no named executive officer received a cash payout. The minimum threshold target required the Company to achieve an EPS target of $0.26, a target of EPS of $0.31 or a maximum target of $0.36 in order to achieve the respective payouts. Long-Term Compensation — Equity Incentives The Compensation Committee uses the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) as a means for determining awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards to our officers and other executives based on multi-year performance. All of the awards are granted under the 2007 Plan. Our LTIP is designed to motivate our executives to focus on achievement of our long-term financial goals. Equity awards motivate our executives to achieve our long-term goals and to the extent our results affect our stock price, link such results with the performance of our stock over a three to four -year period. Using equity awards helps us to retain executives, In fiscal year 2014, LTIP awards were composed solely of stock options. Stock options vested one third on the first anniversary of the grant date, with one third vesting each year thereafter. The Committee believes that stock options provide clear alignment with stockholder interests. Performance Shares. In past fiscal years, the Compensation Committee recommended performance share awards that are earned, if the performance criteria are met, at the end of a three year plan cycle. The maximum possible entitlement to performance shares will occur if 100% of the target is achieved. In addition, irrespective of Company performance versus target, there is no entitlement to performance shares unless the award recipient continues to be employed throughout the multi- year period. Performance shares are subject to repurchase by the Company at $0.01 per share if eligible employment ends during the performance measurement period and to the extent the maximum performance is not achieved during the performance measurement period. For fiscal year 2014, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, all of the performance based restricted shares under the fiscal year 2011 LTIP, were repurchased by the Company since the Compensation Committee determined that the threshold targets had not been met. For compensation planning purposes, awards of performance-based restricted stock are valued at the fair market value of the shares on the date of award, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. Stock Options. The Compensation Committee believes that stock options directly align the interests of executives and stockholders as the options only result in gain to the recipient if our stock price increases above the exercise price of the options. In addition, options are intended to help retain key employees because they vest over a period of time, and to assist in the hiring of new executives by replacing the value of stock options that may have been forfeited as a result of leaving a former employer. Generally, options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date. Typically, the Compensation Committee awards stock options that vest and become exercisable solely on the basis of continued employment, or other service, over three or four years. Duration of stock options (subject to the terms of the 2007 Plan) is seven years from grant date. For compensation planning purposes, awards of stock options are valued using the Black-Scholes valuation method, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. In fiscal year 2014, the Black-Scholes valuations were approximately 50% of the grant-date exercise price value of the shares subject to the option. Service-Based Restricted Stock. Service-based restricted stock awards are awards of stock at the start of a vesting period which is subject to repurchase for nominal consideration if the specified vesting conditions are not satisfied. In addition to their use as a component of the LTIP, awards of service-based restricted stock may be made on a selective basis to individual executives primarily to facilitate retention and succession planning or to replace the value of equity awards that may have been forfeited as a result of the executive’s leaving a former employer. For compensation planning purposes, awards of service-based restricted stock are valued at the fair market value of the shares on the date of award, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. Typically, the Compensation Committee awards restricted stock that vests and becomes exercisable solely on the basis of continued employment, or other service, usually over three years, with 33 1/3 % vesting on the first anniversary of the date of the grant and an additional 33 1/3 % vesting on the second and third anniversaries of the date of the grant. Unvested shares are subject to repurchase by the Company at $0.01 per share if employment ends before the third anniversary of the grant date. Recovery of Executive Compensation Our executive compensation program permits us to recover or “clawback” all or a portion of any performance-based compensation if our financial statements are restated as a result of errors, omissions, or fraud. The amount which may be recovered will be the amount by which the affected compensation exceeded the amount that would have been payable had the financial statements been initially filed as restated, or any greater or lesser amount that the Compensation Committee or our Board shall determine. In no case will the amount to be recovered by us be less than the amount required to be repaid or recovered as a matter of law. Recovery of such amounts by us would be in addition to any actions imposed by law, enforcement agencies, regulators, or other authorities. Hedging Prohibition Our executive officers, as well as other employees, are prohibited from engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities where the transaction is designed or intended to decrease the risks associated with holding our securities. This prohibition includes transactions involving puts, call, collars or other derivative securities. 24 24 25 approved, that named executive base salaries be held flat at fiscal year 2013 levels. Additional details concerning the compensation for our named executive officers for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. encourage share ownership and maintain a direct link between our executive compensation program and the value and appreciation in the value of our stock. Annual Incentive The short-term incentive element of our executive compensation program is currently comprised of our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”). The CEO reviews his recommendations for each named executive officer with the Compensation Committee, taking into account benchmarked market data obtained from Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant. Based on recommendations by the CEO, and as specified in any applicable employment agreement, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board an annual incentive compensation target, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each executive officer in August. Each named executive officer’s target annual incentive percentage is benchmarked against the 50th percentile within the market composite for his or her specific role. The Compensation Committee also recommends to the Board specific Company financial performance measures and targets including the relative weighting and payout thresholds. The financial targets are aligned with our Board-approved annual operating plan, and during the year periodic reports are made to the Board about our performance compared with the targets. Under the AIP, a significant portion of the executive’s annual compensation is tied directly to our financial performance. The target amount of annual incentive compensation under our AIP, expressed as a percentage of base salary, generally increases with an executive’s level of management responsibility. AIP target incentive can represent up to 100% of the base cash compensation for our named executive officers and may be paid in the form of cash, stock or a combination of the two. If performance results meet target levels, our executives can earn up to a maximum of 100% of their target incentive. No incentive can be earned for performance below the minimum threshold. Equity awards under the AIP are granted under the 2007 Plan. For fiscal year 2014, the AIP provided for a cash payout and contained minimum, target and maximum performance thresholds based on the performance measures, using EPS as the performance metric. The threshold amounts were established in August 2013, and the plan provided for no payout if the minimum threshold was not met, a 50% payout if the minimum threshold was met and a 100% payout if the target was achieved. If the maximum target threshold was met, the plan was capped at 150% payout. The EPS performance thresholds for fiscal year 2014 were based on a non-GAAP measure that excluded share-based compensation, amortization of purchased technology, transactional tax assessments, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, excess and obsolete inventory writedowns associated with legacy products, costs related to liquidation of foreign subsidiaries, property plant and equipment impairment charges, adjustments to the pro forma tax rate, non-recurring income and other non-recurring charges. Table 1 Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan Metric Tiers Results-Driven Entitlement Performance Payout (As % of Financial Target) (As % of Award Target) Earnings Per Share Minimum Threshold. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Target . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maximum Threshold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50% 100% 150% 50% 100% 150% In fiscal year 2014, the AIP did not guarantee payout of the target amounts, and the Compensation Committee considered the EPS performance thresholds to be challenging. During the 2014 fiscal year, we did not achieve the minimum threshold target for AIP awards; therefore, no named executive officer received a cash payout. The minimum threshold target required the Company to achieve an EPS target of $0.26, a target of EPS of $0.31 or a maximum target of $0.36 in order to achieve the respective payouts. Long-Term Compensation — Equity Incentives The Compensation Committee uses the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) as a means for determining awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards to our officers and other executives based on multi-year performance. All of the awards are granted under the 2007 Plan. Our LTIP is designed to motivate our executives to focus on achievement of our long-term financial goals. Equity awards motivate our executives to achieve our long-term goals and to the extent our results affect our stock price, link such results with the performance of our stock over a three to four -year period. Using equity awards helps us to retain executives, In fiscal year 2014, LTIP awards were composed solely of stock options. Stock options vested one third on the first anniversary of the grant date, with one third vesting each year thereafter. The Committee believes that stock options provide clear alignment with stockholder interests. Performance Shares. In past fiscal years, the Compensation Committee recommended performance share awards that are earned, if the performance criteria are met, at the end of a three year plan cycle. The maximum possible entitlement to performance shares will occur if 100% of the target is achieved. In addition, irrespective of Company performance versus target, there is no entitlement to performance shares unless the award recipient continues to be employed throughout the multi- year period. Performance shares are subject to repurchase by the Company at $0.01 per share if eligible employment ends during the performance measurement period and to the extent the maximum performance is not achieved during the performance measurement period. For fiscal year 2014, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, all of the performance based restricted shares under the fiscal year 2011 LTIP, were repurchased by the Company since the Compensation Committee determined that the threshold targets had not been met. For compensation planning purposes, awards of performance-based restricted stock are valued at the fair market value of the shares on the date of award, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. Stock Options. The Compensation Committee believes that stock options directly align the interests of executives and stockholders as the options only result in gain to the recipient if our stock price increases above the exercise price of the options. In addition, options are intended to help retain key employees because they vest over a period of time, and to assist in the hiring of new executives by replacing the value of stock options that may have been forfeited as a result of leaving a former employer. Generally, options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date. Typically, the Compensation Committee awards stock options that vest and become exercisable solely on the basis of continued employment, or other service, over three or four years. Duration of stock options (subject to the terms of the 2007 Plan) is seven years from grant date. For compensation planning purposes, awards of stock options are valued using the Black-Scholes valuation method, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. In fiscal year 2014, the Black-Scholes valuations were approximately 50% of the grant-date exercise price value of the shares subject to the option. Service-Based Restricted Stock. Service-based restricted stock awards are awards of stock at the start of a vesting period which is subject to repurchase for nominal consideration if the specified vesting conditions are not satisfied. In addition to their use as a component of the LTIP, awards of service-based restricted stock may be made on a selective basis to individual executives primarily to facilitate retention and succession planning or to replace the value of equity awards that may have been forfeited as a result of the executive’s leaving a former employer. For compensation planning purposes, awards of service-based restricted stock are valued at the fair market value of the shares on the date of award, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. Typically, the Compensation Committee awards restricted stock that vests and becomes exercisable solely on the basis of continued employment, or other service, usually over three years, with 33 1/3 % vesting on the first anniversary of the date of the grant and an additional 33 1/3 % vesting on the second and third anniversaries of the date of the grant. Unvested shares are subject to repurchase by the Company at $0.01 per share if employment ends before the third anniversary of the grant date. Recovery of Executive Compensation Our executive compensation program permits us to recover or “clawback” all or a portion of any performance-based compensation if our financial statements are restated as a result of errors, omissions, or fraud. The amount which may be recovered will be the amount by which the affected compensation exceeded the amount that would have been payable had the financial statements been initially filed as restated, or any greater or lesser amount that the Compensation Committee or our Board shall determine. In no case will the amount to be recovered by us be less than the amount required to be repaid or recovered as a matter of law. Recovery of such amounts by us would be in addition to any actions imposed by law, enforcement agencies, regulators, or other authorities. Hedging Prohibition Our executive officers, as well as other employees, are prohibited from engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities where the transaction is designed or intended to decrease the risks associated with holding our securities. This prohibition includes transactions involving puts, call, collars or other derivative securities. 24 25 25 Proxy Statement Post-Termination Compensation Employment agreements have been established with each of our named executive officers. These agreements provide discussed in more detail below. We have determined that such payments and benefits are an integral part of a competitive compensation package for our named executive officers. For additional information regarding our employment agreements with our named executive officers, see the discussion under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.” The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors Dr. James C. Stoffel, Chairman Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program The Compensation Committee, pursuant to its charter, is responsible for reviewing and overseeing the compensation benefits structure applicable to our employees, generally. We do not believe that our compensation policies and practices for our employees give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the following factors: • Our compensation program is designed to provide a mix of both fixed and “at risk” incentive compensation. • The incentive elements of our compensation program (annual incentives and multi-year equity LTIP awards) are designed to reward both annual performance (under the annual incentive plan) and longer-term performance (under the LTIP). We believe this design mitigates any incentive for short-term risk-taking that could be detrimental to our company’s long-term best interests. • Maximum payouts under our annual incentive plan are currently capped at 100% of target payouts. We believe these limits mitigate excessive risk-taking, since the maximum amount that can be earned is limited. • Finally, our annual incentive plan and our long-term incentive plan both contain provisions under which awards may be recouped or forfeited if the recipient has not complied with our policies. In addition, our performance- based plans (cash incentive and performance shares) both contain provisions under which awards may be recouped or forfeited if the financial results for a period affecting the calculation of an award are later restated. Perquisites Our executive officers participate in the same group insurance and employee benefit plans as our other full-time U.S. for certain payments and benefits to the employee if his or her employment with us is terminated. These arrangements are employees. We do not provide special benefits or other perquisites to our executive officers. Stock Ownership Guidelines While we do not have a minimum stock ownership requirement for members of the Board and our named executive officers, the corporate governance guidelines adopted by the Board encourage the ownership of our common stock. The Compensation Committee is satisfied that the stock and other equity holdings among our executive officers are sufficient at this time to provide appropriate motivation to align this group’s long-term interests with those of our stockholders. Compensation Committee Report t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Tax and Accounting Considerations Tax Considerations. The Compensation Committee generally considers the federal income tax and financial accounting consequences of the various components of the executive compensation program in making decisions about executive compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that achieving the compensation objectives discussed above is more important than the benefit of tax deductibility and the executive compensation programs may, from time to time, limit the tax deductibility of compensation. Nevertheless, when not inconsistent with these objectives, the Compensation Committee endeavors to award compensation that will be deductible for income tax purposes. Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) may limit the tax deductions that a public company can claim for compensation to some of its named executive officers. The Company does not guarantee that any compensation intended to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) so qualifies. Accounting Considerations. The Compensation Committee also considers the accounting implications of various forms of executive compensation. In its financial statements, the Company records salaries and performance-based compensation such as bonuses as expenses in the amount paid or to be paid to the named executive officers. Accounting rules also require the Company to record an expense in its financial statements for equity awards, even though equity awards are not paid as cash to employees. The accounting expense of equity awards to employees is calculated in accordance with GAAP. The Compensation Committee believes that the many advantages of equity compensation, as discussed above, more than compensate for the non-cash accounting expense associated with them. Benefits under the 401(k) Plan and Generally Available Benefit Programs In fiscal year 2014, our named executive officers were eligible to participate in the health and welfare programs that are generally available to all full-time U.S.-based employees, including medical, dental, vision, life, short-term and long-term disability, employee assistance, flexible spending and accidental death and dismemberment. In addition, the named executive officers and all other eligible U.S.-based employees can participate in our tax- qualified 401(k) Plan. Under the 401(k) Plan, all eligible employees can receive matching contributions from the Company; however, the Company suspended matching effective January 1, 2014 for an indefinite period of time. Our company-matching contribution for the 401(k) Plan prior to January 1, 2014 was 100% of the first 5% of contributions by the employee to the 401 (k) Plan. Employees under the age of 50 can contribute a maximum per participating employee of $17,500 during each calendar year, and employees over the age of 50 can contribute a maximum per participating employee of $23,000. We do not provide defined benefit pension plans or defined contribution retirement plans to the named executive officers or other employees other than the 401(k) Plan, or as required in certain countries other than the United States, for legal or competitive reasons. We adopted an employee stock purchase plan effective November 19, 2009 and commencing on July 3, 2010, under which named executive officers and all other eligible U.S.-based employees can elect, on a quarterly basis, to apply a portion of their cash compensation to purchase shares of our common stock at a 5% discount. An employee’s total purchases in any year cannot exceed $25,000 in value or 15% of his or her salary, whichever is less. Furthermore, an employee may not purchase more than 608 shares of common stock annually under the employee stock purchase plan. The 401(k) Plan, employee stock purchase plan and the other benefit programs allow us to remain competitive and enhance employee loyalty and productivity. These benefit programs are primarily intended to provide all eligible employees with competitive and quality healthcare, financial contributions for retirement and to enhance hiring and retention. 26 26 27 Our executive officers participate in the same group insurance and employee benefit plans as our other full-time U.S. employees. We do not provide special benefits or other perquisites to our executive officers. Perquisites Stock Ownership Guidelines While we do not have a minimum stock ownership requirement for members of the Board and our named executive officers, the corporate governance guidelines adopted by the Board encourage the ownership of our common stock. The Compensation Committee is satisfied that the stock and other equity holdings among our executive officers are sufficient at this time to provide appropriate motivation to align this group’s long-term interests with those of our stockholders. Tax and Accounting Considerations Tax Considerations. The Compensation Committee generally considers the federal income tax and financial accounting consequences of the various components of the executive compensation program in making decisions about executive compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that achieving the compensation objectives discussed above is more important than the benefit of tax deductibility and the executive compensation programs may, from time to time, limit the tax deductibility of compensation. Nevertheless, when not inconsistent with these objectives, the Compensation Committee endeavors to award compensation that will be deductible for income tax purposes. Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) may limit the tax deductions that a public company can claim for compensation to some of its named executive officers. The Company does not guarantee that any compensation intended to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) so qualifies. Accounting Considerations. The Compensation Committee also considers the accounting implications of various forms of executive compensation. In its financial statements, the Company records salaries and performance-based compensation such as bonuses as expenses in the amount paid or to be paid to the named executive officers. Accounting rules also require the Company to record an expense in its financial statements for equity awards, even though equity awards are not paid as cash to employees. The accounting expense of equity awards to employees is calculated in accordance with GAAP. The Compensation Committee believes that the many advantages of equity compensation, as discussed above, more than compensate for the non-cash accounting expense associated with them. Benefits under the 401(k) Plan and Generally Available Benefit Programs In fiscal year 2014, our named executive officers were eligible to participate in the health and welfare programs that are generally available to all full-time U.S.-based employees, including medical, dental, vision, life, short-term and long-term disability, employee assistance, flexible spending and accidental death and dismemberment. In addition, the named executive officers and all other eligible U.S.-based employees can participate in our tax- qualified 401(k) Plan. Under the 401(k) Plan, all eligible employees can receive matching contributions from the Company; however, the Company suspended matching effective January 1, 2014 for an indefinite period of time. Our company-matching contribution for the 401(k) Plan prior to January 1, 2014 was 100% of the first 5% of contributions by the employee to the 401 (k) Plan. Employees under the age of 50 can contribute a maximum per participating employee of $17,500 during each calendar year, and employees over the age of 50 can contribute a maximum per participating employee of $23,000. We do not provide defined benefit pension plans or defined contribution retirement plans to the named executive officers or other employees other than the 401(k) Plan, or as required in certain countries other than the United States, for legal or competitive reasons. We adopted an employee stock purchase plan effective November 19, 2009 and commencing on July 3, 2010, under which named executive officers and all other eligible U.S.-based employees can elect, on a quarterly basis, to apply a portion of their cash compensation to purchase shares of our common stock at a 5% discount. An employee’s total purchases in any year cannot exceed $25,000 in value or 15% of his or her salary, whichever is less. Furthermore, an employee may not purchase more than 608 shares of common stock annually under the employee stock purchase plan. The 401(k) Plan, employee stock purchase plan and the other benefit programs allow us to remain competitive and enhance employee loyalty and productivity. These benefit programs are primarily intended to provide all eligible employees with competitive and quality healthcare, financial contributions for retirement and to enhance hiring and retention. Post-Termination Compensation Employment agreements have been established with each of our named executive officers. These agreements provide for certain payments and benefits to the employee if his or her employment with us is terminated. These arrangements are discussed in more detail below. We have determined that such payments and benefits are an integral part of a competitive compensation package for our named executive officers. For additional information regarding our employment agreements with our named executive officers, see the discussion under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.” Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors Dr. James C. Stoffel, Chairman Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program The Compensation Committee, pursuant to its charter, is responsible for reviewing and overseeing the compensation benefits structure applicable to our employees, generally. We do not believe that our compensation policies and practices for our employees give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the following factors: • Our compensation program is designed to provide a mix of both fixed and “at risk” incentive compensation. • The incentive elements of our compensation program (annual incentives and multi-year equity LTIP awards) are designed to reward both annual performance (under the annual incentive plan) and longer-term performance (under the LTIP). We believe this design mitigates any incentive for short-term risk-taking that could be detrimental to our company’s long-term best interests. • Maximum payouts under our annual incentive plan are currently capped at 100% of target payouts. We believe these limits mitigate excessive risk-taking, since the maximum amount that can be earned is limited. • Finally, our annual incentive plan and our long-term incentive plan both contain provisions under which awards may be recouped or forfeited if the recipient has not complied with our policies. In addition, our performance- based plans (cash incentive and performance shares) both contain provisions under which awards may be recouped or forfeited if the financial results for a period affecting the calculation of an award are later restated. 26 27 27 Proxy Statement Summary Compensation Table The following table summarizes the total compensation for each of our fiscal years ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 of our named executive officers, who consisted of our CEO, CFO and the next three other most highly compensated executive officers. t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Name/Principal Position Michael Pangia, Chief Executive Officer (2) . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2). . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe, Senior Vice President and Chief Sales Officer (formerly Chief Operations Officer) (2) . . . . . . Shaun McFall, Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing and Strategy Officer . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year (1) 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 _______________________ Salary (3) ($) 550,000 550,000 542,500 360,000 360,000 345,000 340,385 325,000 320,000 315,385 300,000 300,000 300,000 295,385 Stock Awards (5) Option Awards (6) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (7) Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (8) All Other Compensation (9) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) Bonus (4) ($) Total ($) 235,385 75,000 355,937 458,068 96,250 — — 495,542 — 539,809 160,999 — — — 405,533 366,576 275,000 — — 243,265 — 264,997 79,036 — — — — 217,588 — 187,405 70,693 97,476 60,887 89,977 — 237,026 92,430 — 204,146 85,320 — — — — — 162,178 — 176,665 — 85,320 52,691 89,977 — — 97,500 — — 90,000 — — 90,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2,142 1,047,684 92,778 1,343,586 234,689 1,824,298 6,284 609,549 14,996 719,029 54,426 1,275,066 2,415 2,379 2,260 5,940 14,170 9,181 4,569 13,414 13,584 565,003 650,483 614,666 513,345 594,588 574,478 466,747 542,770 574,266 (8) (9) Name (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Our fiscal year 2014 ended June 27, 2014, fiscal year 2013 ended June 28, 2013 and our fiscal year 2012 ended June 29, 2012. The amounts in this table represent total compensation paid or earned for our fiscal year as included in our annual financial statements. Effective July 18, 2011, Mr. Pangia was appointed President and CEO. Effective October 31, 2011, Mr. Hayes was appointed Senior Vice President and CFO. Effective June 24, 2012, Mr. Stumpe was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Sales Officer. The annual base salary for Mr. Pangia as our CEO is $550,000. The amount in the Summary Compensation table for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2012 of $542,500 reflects Mr. Pangia’s salary as our Chief Sales Officer for the period July 2, 2011 through July 17, 2011 and as our CEO for the period July 18, 2011 through June 29, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. Hayes is $360,000. The amount in the Summary Compensation table for fiscal year 2012 of $235,385 reflects Mr. Hayes’ salary for the period October 31, 2011 through June 29, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. Stumpe is $345,000 effective July 1, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. McFall is $320,000 effective August 15, 2012. Represents a one-time bonus earned by Mr. Hayes in respect of fiscal year 2012 performance for the achievement of certain management objectives. Georgia. The “Stock Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the performance shares (at target) and restricted stock granted in fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively. The grant date fair value of the performance shares and restricted stock was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards. The grant date fair value for performance awards and restricted stock was based on the closing market price of our common stock on the respective award dates, except for the performance shares granted during fiscal year 2011 as discussed above. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 28 28 29 June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. (6) The “Option Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the stock options granted in fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The grant date fair value of the stock option awards was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. (7) There was no non-equity incentive compensation under the AIP for fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. For fiscal year 2012, this figure represents amounts earned in respect of fiscal year 2012 performance under the fiscal year 2012 AIP as though 100% of revenue and operating income (non-GAAP) targets had been achieved with actual achievement of 100% of both targets. We do not currently have our own pension plan or deferred compensation plan. The following table describes the components of the “All Other Compensation” column. Life Insurance (a) ($) Other Bonus (b) Relocation Benefits (c) Total All Other Compensation ($) ($) ($) ($) Company Matching Contributions Under 401(k) Plan (d) 2,142 2,142 2,100 2,534 2,534 1,657 2,415 2,379 2,260 1,190 1,170 1,104 1,107 914 709 50,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 90,636 232,589 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,750 12,462 2,769 — — — — — — 4,750 13,000 8,077 3,462 12,500 12,875 2,142 92,778 234,689 6,284 14,996 54,426 2,415 2,379 2,260 5,940 14,170 9,181 4,569 13,414 13,584 Year 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 Michael Pangia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _____________________ (a) (b) (c) Represents premiums paid for life insurance that represent taxable income for the named executive officer. Represents a sign-on bonus paid to Mr. Hayes. Represents taxable benefits paid in connection with the relocation of Mr. Pangia’s household to California from (d) Represents matching contributions made by us to the 401(k) account of the respective named executive. Summary Compensation Table The following table summarizes the total compensation for each of our fiscal years ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 of our named executive officers, who consisted of our CEO, CFO and the next three other most highly compensated executive officers. Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred (8) ($) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (7) ($) Compensation Earnings All Other Compensation Name/Principal Position Michael Pangia, Chief Executive Officer (2) . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2). . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe, Senior Vice President and Chief Sales Officer (formerly Chief Operations Officer) (2) . . . . . . Shaun McFall, Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing and Strategy Officer . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year (1) 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 (3) ($) 550,000 550,000 542,500 360,000 360,000 345,000 340,385 325,000 320,000 315,385 300,000 300,000 300,000 295,385 _______________________ Salary Bonus Stock Awards Option Awards (4) ($) (5) ($) (6) ($) — — 495,542 — 539,809 160,999 — 405,533 366,576 275,000 235,385 75,000 355,937 458,068 96,250 — — 243,265 — 264,997 79,036 — 217,588 — 187,405 70,693 97,476 60,887 89,977 — 237,026 92,430 — 204,146 85,320 — — — — — — 162,178 — 176,665 — 85,320 52,691 89,977 — — — — — — — — — — 97,500 90,000 90,000 (9) ($) Total ($) 2,142 1,047,684 92,778 1,343,586 234,689 1,824,298 6,284 609,549 14,996 719,029 54,426 1,275,066 2,415 2,379 2,260 5,940 14,170 9,181 4,569 13,414 13,584 565,003 650,483 614,666 513,345 594,588 574,478 466,747 542,770 574,266 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — June 29, 2012. The amounts in this table represent total compensation paid or earned for our fiscal year as included in our annual financial statements. (2) Effective July 18, 2011, Mr. Pangia was appointed President and CEO. Effective October 31, 2011, Mr. Hayes was appointed Senior Vice President and CFO. Effective June 24, 2012, Mr. Stumpe was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Sales Officer. (3) The annual base salary for Mr. Pangia as our CEO is $550,000. The amount in the Summary Compensation table for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2012 of $542,500 reflects Mr. Pangia’s salary as our Chief Sales Officer for the period July 2, 2011 through July 17, 2011 and as our CEO for the period July 18, 2011 through June 29, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. Hayes is $360,000. The amount in the Summary Compensation table for fiscal year 2012 of $235,385 reflects Mr. Hayes’ salary for the period October 31, 2011 through June 29, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. Stumpe is $345,000 effective July 1, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. McFall is $320,000 effective (4) Represents a one-time bonus earned by Mr. Hayes in respect of fiscal year 2012 performance for the achievement of August 15, 2012. certain management objectives. (5) The “Stock Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the performance shares (at target) and restricted stock granted in fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively. The grant date fair value of the performance shares and restricted stock was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards. The grant date fair value for performance awards and restricted stock was based on the closing market price of our common stock on the respective award dates, except for the performance shares granted during fiscal year 2011 as discussed above. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. The “Option Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the stock options granted in fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The grant date fair value of the stock option awards was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. There was no non-equity incentive compensation under the AIP for fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. For fiscal year 2012, this figure represents amounts earned in respect of fiscal year 2012 performance under the fiscal year 2012 AIP as though 100% of revenue and operating income (non-GAAP) targets had been achieved with actual achievement of 100% of both targets. We do not currently have our own pension plan or deferred compensation plan. The following table describes the components of the “All Other Compensation” column. (6) (7) (8) (9) Name Year ($) ($) (1) Our fiscal year 2014 ended June 27, 2014, fiscal year 2013 ended June 28, 2013 and our fiscal year 2012 ended Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Michael Pangia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _____________________ 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2,142 2,142 2,100 2,534 2,534 1,657 2,415 2,379 2,260 1,190 1,170 1,104 1,107 914 709 — — — — — 50,000 — — — — — — — — — ($) — 90,636 232,589 — — — — — — — — — — — — Life Insurance (a) Other Bonus (b) Relocation Benefits (c) Company Matching Contributions Under 401(k) Plan (d) Total All Other Compensation ($) ($) — — — 3,750 12,462 2,769 — — — 4,750 13,000 8,077 3,462 12,500 12,875 2,142 92,778 234,689 6,284 14,996 54,426 2,415 2,379 2,260 5,940 14,170 9,181 4,569 13,414 13,584 (a) (b) (c) Represents premiums paid for life insurance that represent taxable income for the named executive officer. Represents a sign-on bonus paid to Mr. Hayes. Represents taxable benefits paid in connection with the relocation of Mr. Pangia’s household to California from Georgia. (d) Represents matching contributions made by us to the 401(k) account of the respective named executive. 28 29 29 Proxy Statementt n e m e t a t S y x o r P Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 The following table lists our grants and incentives during our fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 of plan-based awards, both equity and non-equity based and including our Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan, to the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table. There is no assurance that the grant date fair value of stock and option awards will ever be realized. Estimated Possible Payouts Under Short-Term Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 (2) Estimated Future Payments Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 (3) Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Target Maximum All Other Stock Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 Number of Shares of Stock or Units Number of Securities Underlying Options (4) Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (5) ($) ($) ($) (#) (#) (#) (#) (#) ($/Share) ($) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 416,667 204,545 182,955 157,576 136,364 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 495,542 243,265 217,588 187,405 162,178 Name Grant Date (1) Michael Pangia. . . . . 9/9/2013 Edward J. Hayes, Jr.. 9/9/2013 Heinz H. Stumpe . . . 9/9/2013 Shaun McFall . . . . . . 9/9/2013 Meena Elliott . . . . . . 9/9/2013 ______________________ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Grant Date of Common Stock under the 2007 Plan. Heinz H. Stumpe . . . 09/09/2013 182,955 (1) There were no Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards granted under our fiscal year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan. There were no Equity Incentive Plan Awards granted under our fiscal year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan. Stock options vest in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. The “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the stock options granted in fiscal year 2014. The grant date fair value of the stock options was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards in the event the vesting provisions are achieved. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014 The following table provides information regarding outstanding unexercised stock options and unvested stock awards held by each of our named executive officers as of June 27, 2014. Each grant of options or unvested stock awards is shown separately for each named executive officer. The vesting schedule for each award of options is shown in the footnotes following this table based on the option grant date. The material terms of the option awards, other than exercise price and vesting are generally described in the 2007 Plan. 30 30 Option Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) (#) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($) Name Michael Pangia. . . . . 09/09/2013 Edward J. Hayes, Jr. . 09/09/2013 204,545 (1) Award Grant Date 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 03/30/2009 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 — — 68,750 225,965 — 50,000 49,052 80,586 33,750 222,175 101,959 — — — — — — 30,187 60,086 — 55,000 30,100 37,326 — — 26,000 55,464 — 55,000 26,198 29,796 — — 22,500 55,464 — 40,000 22,297 16,428 416,667 (1) — 68,750 (2) 75,322 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 33,750 (2) 74,059 (2) 33,987 (2) — — — — 30,188 (2) 20,029 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 157,576 (1) — 26,000 (2) 18,488 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 136,364 (1) — 22,500 (2) 18,488 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) Shaun McFall . . . . . . 09/09/2013 Meena Elliott . . . . . . 09/09/2013 Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (4) ($) Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (3) (#) Stock Awards Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares Units or Other Rights that have not Vested Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have not Vested (3) (#) ($) 22,298 (5) 27,873 — 32,592 40,740 10,946 (5) 13,683 30,487 11,738 38,109 14,673 9,791 (5) 12,239 — 4,333 5,416 11/11/2017 — — 8,433 (5) 10,541 7,298 (5) 9,123 — 4,000 5,000 — 4,000 5,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — __ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Option Expiration Date 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 3/30/2016 9/9/2020 10/3/2019 10/31/2018 10/31/2018 — — — — 9/9/20 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 2.60 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 4.05 2.6 — 2.28 2.05 2.05 — — 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ______________________ (1) Stock options vest in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. (2) Stock options vest in installments of 50% one year from the grant date, 25% two years from the grant date and 25% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. (3) Restricted stock that vests in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. (4) Market value is based on the $1.25 closing price of a share of our common stock on June 27, 2014, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 31 Stock Awards Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (4) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares Units or Other Rights that have not Vested Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (3) (#) ($) (#) Award Grant Date Name Michael Pangia. . . . . 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 03/30/2009 Edward J. Hayes, Jr. . 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 Grant Date of Common Stock under the 2007 Plan. Heinz H. Stumpe . . . 09/09/2013 There were no Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards granted under our fiscal year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan. There were no Equity Incentive Plan Awards granted under our fiscal year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan. Stock options vest in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. (5) The “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the stock options granted in fiscal year 2014. The grant date fair value of the stock options was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards in the event the vesting provisions are achieved. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 Shaun McFall . . . . . . 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by Meena Elliott . . . . . . 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 ______________________ Option Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) (#) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($) — — 68,750 225,965 — 50,000 49,052 80,586 — — 33,750 222,175 101,959 — — — — 30,187 60,086 — 55,000 30,100 37,326 — — 26,000 55,464 — 55,000 26,198 29,796 — — 22,500 55,464 — 40,000 22,297 16,428 416,667 (1) — 68,750 (2) 75,322 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 204,545 (1) — 33,750 (2) 74,059 (2) 33,987 (2) — — 182,955 (1) — 30,188 (2) 20,029 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 157,576 (1) — 26,000 (2) 18,488 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 136,364 (1) — 22,500 (2) 18,488 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.60 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 4.05 2.6 — 2.28 2.05 2.05 — — 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 The following table lists our grants and incentives during our fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 of plan-based awards, both equity and non-equity based and including our Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan, to the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table. There is no assurance that the grant date fair value of stock and option awards will ever be realized. Name ($) ($) ($) (#) (#) (#) (#) (#) ($/Share) Estimated Possible Payouts Under Short-Term Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 (2) Estimated Future Payments Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 (3) Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Target Maximum Number of Shares of Stock or Units Number of Securities Underlying Options (4) Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards All Other Stock Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 416,667 204,545 182,955 157,576 136,364 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (5) ($) 495,542 243,265 217,588 187,405 162,178 Grant Date (1) Michael Pangia. . . . . 9/9/2013 Edward J. Hayes, Jr.. 9/9/2013 Heinz H. Stumpe . . . 9/9/2013 Shaun McFall . . . . . . 9/9/2013 Meena Elliott . . . . . . 9/9/2013 ______________________ (1) (2) (3) (4) the named executive officers. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014 The following table provides information regarding outstanding unexercised stock options and unvested stock awards held by each of our named executive officers as of June 27, 2014. Each grant of options or unvested stock awards is shown separately for each named executive officer. The vesting schedule for each award of options is shown in the footnotes following this table based on the option grant date. The material terms of the option awards, other than exercise price and vesting are generally described in the 2007 Plan. Option Expiration Date 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 — — — — — — — — — 32,592 40,740 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 3/30/2016 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 10/31/2018 10/31/2018 — — 9/9/20 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — __ — 30,487 11,738 38,109 14,673 — — — — — — — — — 4,333 5,416 11/11/2017 — — 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4,000 5,000 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4,000 5,000 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 — — — — — — Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have not Vested (3) ($) — 27,873 — — — — — — — — 22,298 (5) — — — — — — — 10,946 (5) 13,683 — — — — — — — — — — — — 9,791 (5) 12,239 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 8,433 (5) 10,541 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7,298 (5) 9,123 — — — — — — — — — — — — (1) (2) (3) (4) Stock options vest in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. Stock options vest in installments of 50% one year from the grant date, 25% two years from the grant date and 25% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. Restricted stock that vests in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. Market value is based on the $1.25 closing price of a share of our common stock on June 27, 2014, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. 30 31 31 Proxy Statement (5) Performance shares were granted under the fiscal year 2013 LTIP, and vest if performance target is met: 1/3 upon performance target is met, 1/3 at the end of fiscal year 2014 and 1/3 at the end of fiscal year 2015. The performance target is $0.17 of Non-GAAP EPS for fiscal year 2013. The shares may vest following the end of our fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, based on continuous employment and achievement of performance results as stated above. The first one-third of the performance shares vested on August 28, 2013. t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Option Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2014 The following table provides information for each of our named executive officers regarding the number of shares of our common stock acquired upon the vesting of stock awards during fiscal year 2014. No options to purchase common stock were exercised during fiscal year 2014. Stock awards vesting during fiscal year 2014 consisted of restricted stock with service- based and performance-based vesting provisions. Name Michael Pangia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _________________________ Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) Value Realized on Exercise ($) Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) Value Received on Vesting ($) (3) — — — — — — — — — — 40,926 (1) 205,365 (2) 42,226 (1) 100,816 (2) 13,499 (1) 90,174 (2) 13,166 (1) 77,665 (2) 10,666 (1) 67,210 (2) 101,006 498,355 86,986 244,647 29,786 218,823 28,927 188,467 23,852 163,096 (1) (2) (3) Vested number of shares of service-based restricted common stock. Vested number of shares of performance-based restricted common stock. Amount shown is the aggregate market value of the vested shares of restricted common stock based on the closing price of our stock on the vesting date. Equity Compensation Plan Summary The following table provides information as of June 27, 2014, relating to our equity compensation plan pursuant to which grants of options, restricted stock and performance shares may be granted from time to time and the option plans and agreements assumed by us in connection with the Stratex acquisition: Number of Securities Remaining Available for Further Issuance Under Equity Compensation Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected Options, Warrants and Rights (1) Outstanding Options (2) in the First Column) Equity Compensation plan approved by security holders(3) . . . . . . . Equity Compensation plans not approved by security holders(4) . . . Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,708,529 32,625 7,741,154 $ $ $ 3.21 24.60 3.30 3,599,382 — 3,599,382 Plan Category _____________________ (1) Under the 2007 Plan, in addition to options, we have granted share-based compensation awards in the form of performance shares, restricted stock, performance share units and restricted stock units. As of June 27, 2014, there were 389,612 such awards outstanding under that plan. The outstanding awards consisted of (i) performance share awards at target and restricted stock awards, for which all 197,457 shares were issued and outstanding; and (ii) 192,155 performance share unit awards at target and restricted stock unit awards, for which all 192,155 were payable in shares but for which no shares were yet issued and outstanding. The 7,708,529 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights as listed in the first column consisted of shares to be issued in respect of the exercise of 7,516,374 outstanding options and in respect of the 192,155 combined performance share awards, performance share unit awards, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units awards payable in shares. (2) Excludes weighted average fair value of performance share awards, performance share unit awards, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units at issuance date. Consists solely of the 2007 Plan. Consists of common stock that may be issued pursuant to option plans and agreements assumed pursuant to the Stratex acquisition. The Stratex plans were duly approved by the stockholders of Stratex prior to the merger with us. No shares are available for further issuance. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control Employment agreements have been established with each of the continuing named executive officers, which provide for such executives to receive certain payments and benefits if their employment with us is terminated. These arrangements are set forth in detail below assuming a termination event on June 27, 2014 based on our stock price on that date. The Board has determined that such payments and benefits are an integral part of a competitive compensation package for our executive (3) (4) officers. The table below reflects the compensation and benefits due to each of the named executive officers in the event of termination of employment by us without cause or termination by the executive for good reason (other than within 18 months after a Change of Control, as defined below) and in the event of disability and in the event of termination of employment by us without cause or termination by the executive for good reason within 18 months after a Change of Control. The amounts shown in the table are estimates of the amounts that would be paid upon termination of employment. There are no compensation and benefits due to any named executive officer in the event of death, or of termination of employment by us for cause or voluntary termination. The actual amounts would be determined only at the time of the termination of employment. 32 32 33 (5) Performance shares were granted under the fiscal year 2013 LTIP, and vest if performance target is met: 1/3 upon Equity Compensation Plan Summary performance target is met, 1/3 at the end of fiscal year 2014 and 1/3 at the end of fiscal year 2015. The performance target is $0.17 of Non-GAAP EPS for fiscal year 2013. The shares may vest following the end of our fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, based on continuous employment and achievement of performance results as stated above. The first one-third of the performance shares vested on August 28, 2013. The following table provides information as of June 27, 2014, relating to our equity compensation plan pursuant to which grants of options, restricted stock and performance shares may be granted from time to time and the option plans and agreements assumed by us in connection with the Stratex acquisition: Option Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2014 The following table provides information for each of our named executive officers regarding the number of shares of our common stock acquired upon the vesting of stock awards during fiscal year 2014. No options to purchase common stock were exercised during fiscal year 2014. Stock awards vesting during fiscal year 2014 consisted of restricted stock with service- based and performance-based vesting provisions. Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) Value Realized on Exercise ($) Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) Value Received on Vesting ($) (3) Name Michael Pangia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — — — — — 40,926 (1) 205,365 (2) 42,226 (1) 100,816 (2) 13,499 (1) 90,174 (2) 13,166 (1) 77,665 (2) 10,666 (1) 67,210 (2) 101,006 498,355 86,986 244,647 29,786 218,823 28,927 188,467 23,852 163,096 _________________________ Vested number of shares of service-based restricted common stock. Vested number of shares of performance-based restricted common stock. (1) (2) (3) Amount shown is the aggregate market value of the vested shares of restricted common stock based on the closing price of our stock on the vesting date. Plan Category Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1) Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options (2) Equity Compensation plan approved by security holders(3) . . . . . . . Equity Compensation plans not approved by security holders(4) . . . Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,708,529 32,625 7,741,154 $ $ $ 3.21 24.60 3.30 _____________________ Number of Securities Remaining Available for Further Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column) 3,599,382 — 3,599,382 (1) (2) (3) (4) Under the 2007 Plan, in addition to options, we have granted share-based compensation awards in the form of performance shares, restricted stock, performance share units and restricted stock units. As of June 27, 2014, there were 389,612 such awards outstanding under that plan. The outstanding awards consisted of (i) performance share awards at target and restricted stock awards, for which all 197,457 shares were issued and outstanding; and (ii) 192,155 performance share unit awards at target and restricted stock unit awards, for which all 192,155 were payable in shares but for which no shares were yet issued and outstanding. The 7,708,529 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights as listed in the first column consisted of shares to be issued in respect of the exercise of 7,516,374 outstanding options and in respect of the 192,155 combined performance share awards, performance share unit awards, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units awards payable in shares. Excludes weighted average fair value of performance share awards, performance share unit awards, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units at issuance date. Consists solely of the 2007 Plan. Consists of common stock that may be issued pursuant to option plans and agreements assumed pursuant to the Stratex acquisition. The Stratex plans were duly approved by the stockholders of Stratex prior to the merger with us. No shares are available for further issuance. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control Employment agreements have been established with each of the continuing named executive officers, which provide for such executives to receive certain payments and benefits if their employment with us is terminated. These arrangements are set forth in detail below assuming a termination event on June 27, 2014 based on our stock price on that date. The Board has determined that such payments and benefits are an integral part of a competitive compensation package for our executive officers. The table below reflects the compensation and benefits due to each of the named executive officers in the event of termination of employment by us without cause or termination by the executive for good reason (other than within 18 months after a Change of Control, as defined below) and in the event of disability and in the event of termination of employment by us without cause or termination by the executive for good reason within 18 months after a Change of Control. The amounts shown in the table are estimates of the amounts that would be paid upon termination of employment. There are no compensation and benefits due to any named executive officer in the event of death, or of termination of employment by us for cause or voluntary termination. The actual amounts would be determined only at the time of the termination of employment. 32 33 33 Proxy Statement Name Michael Pangia . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr. . . t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . Conditions for Payouts Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Number of Months (#) Base per Month (1) ($) Months Times Base ($) Total Severance Payments ($) Accelerated Equity Vesting (3) ($) Continuation of Insurance Benefit (4) ($) Out- Placement Services (5) ($) Total ($) 12 45,833 550,000 550,000 — 20,362 30,000 600,362 24 45,833 1,100,000 1,100,000 68,613 40,724 30,000 1,239,337 12 30,000 360,000 360,000 — 18,072 30,000 408,072 24 30,000 720,000 720,000 66,464 36,145 30,000 852,609 12 28,750 345,000 345,000 — 16,520 30,000 391,520 24 28,750 690,000 690,000 17,655 33,040 30,000 770,695 12 26,667 320,000 320,000 — 25,124 30,000 375,124 24 26,667 640,000 640,000 15,541 50,247 30,000 735,788 Employment agreements are in effect for the other current named executive officers, which provide that if they are terminated without cause or should they resign for good reason or become disabled and they sign a general release they will be entitled to receive the following severance benefits: 12 25,000 300,000 300,000 — 18,072 30,000 348,072 severance payments at their final base salary for a period of 12 months following termination; 24 25,000 600,000 600,000 14,123 36,145 30,000 680,268 employer’s group health insurance plan; ______________________ (1) (2) (3) (4) The monthly base salary represents the total gross monthly payments to each named executive officer at the current salary. Reflects acceleration of outstanding equity awards as of June 27, 2014. The insurance benefit provided is paid directly to the insurer benefit provider and includes amounts for COBRA. The estimated dollar amounts for outplacement services would be paid directly to an outplacement provider selected by us. 34 34 35 The employment agreements with our named executive officers define a “Change of Control” as follows: • any merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition, unless immediately following such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition of at least 50% of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the entity resulting from such merger, consolidation or share exchange, or the entity which has acquired all or substantially all of our assets (in the case of an asset sale that satisfies the criteria of an acquisition) (in either case, the “Surviving Entity”); or • if applicable, the ultimate parent entity that directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 50% or more of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Surviving Entity is represented by our securities that were outstanding immediately prior to such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition (or, if applicable, is represented by shares into which such Company securities were converted pursuant to such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition); or • any person or group of persons (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership (determined pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of securities possessing more than 30% of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities pursuant to a tender or exchange offer made directly to the our stockholders that the Board does not recommend such stockholders accept, other than: (i) an employee benefit plan of ours or any of our affiliates; (ii) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of our or any of our affiliates; or (iii) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities; or • over a period of 36 consecutive months or less, there is a change in the composition of the Board such that a majority of the Board members (rounded up to the next whole number, if a fraction) ceases, by reason of one or more proxy contests for the election of Board members, to be composed of individuals each of whom meet one of the following criteria: (i) have been a Board member continuously since the adoption of this plan or the beginning of such 36-month period; (ii) have been appointed by Harris Corporation; or (iii) have been elected or nominated during such 36-month period by at least a majority of the Board members that belong to the same Class of director as such Board member; and (iv) satisfied one of the above criteria when they were elected or nominated; or a majority of the Board determines that a Change of Control has occurred; or the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company. • • • • payment of premiums necessary to continue their group health insurance under COBRA (or to purchase other comparable health coverage on an individual basis if the employee is no longer eligible for COBRA coverage) until the earlier of (i) 12 months; or (ii) the date on which they first became eligible to participate in another • the prorated portion of any incentive bonus they would have earned during the incentive bonus period in which their employment was terminated; • any equity compensation subject to service-based vesting granted to the executive officer will stop vesting as of their termination date; however, they will be entitled to purchase any vested share(s) of stock that are subject to the outstanding options until the earlier of: (i) 12 months; or (ii) the date on which the applicable option(s) expire; and • outplacement assistance selected and paid for by us. In addition, these agreements provide that if there is a Change of Control, and employment with us is terminated by us without cause or by the employee for good reason within 18 months after the Change of Control and they sign a general release of known and unknown claims in a form satisfactory to us, (i) the severance benefits described shall be increased by an additional 12 months; (ii) they will receive a payment equal to the greater of (a) the average of the annual incentive bonus payments received by them, if any, for the previous three years; or (b) their target incentive bonus for the year in which their Conditions for Payouts Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Name Michael Pangia . . . . . . Number Months of (#) 12 Base per Month Months Times (1) ($) Base ($) Total Severance Payments ($) Accelerated Equity Vesting (3) Continuation of Insurance Benefit (4) ($) ($) Out- Placement Services (5) ($) Total ($) 45,833 550,000 550,000 — 20,362 30,000 600,362 24 45,833 1,100,000 1,100,000 68,613 40,724 30,000 1,239,337 Edward J. Hayes, Jr. . . 12 30,000 360,000 360,000 — 18,072 30,000 408,072 24 30,000 720,000 720,000 66,464 36,145 30,000 852,609 Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . 12 28,750 345,000 345,000 — 16,520 30,000 391,520 24 28,750 690,000 690,000 17,655 33,040 30,000 770,695 Shaun McFall . . . . . . . 12 26,667 320,000 320,000 — 25,124 30,000 375,124 The employment agreements with our named executive officers define a “Change of Control” as follows: • • • • • • any merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition, unless immediately following such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition of at least 50% of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the entity resulting from such merger, consolidation or share exchange, or the entity which has acquired all or substantially all of our assets (in the case of an asset sale that satisfies the criteria of an acquisition) (in either case, the “Surviving Entity”); or if applicable, the ultimate parent entity that directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 50% or more of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Surviving Entity is represented by our securities that were outstanding immediately prior to such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition (or, if applicable, is represented by shares into which such Company securities were converted pursuant to such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition); or any person or group of persons (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership (determined pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of securities possessing more than 30% of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities pursuant to a tender or exchange offer made directly to the our stockholders that the Board does not recommend such stockholders accept, other than: (i) an employee benefit plan of ours or any of our affiliates; (ii) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of our or any of our affiliates; or (iii) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities; or over a period of 36 consecutive months or less, there is a change in the composition of the Board such that a majority of the Board members (rounded up to the next whole number, if a fraction) ceases, by reason of one or more proxy contests for the election of Board members, to be composed of individuals each of whom meet one of the following criteria: (i) have been a Board member continuously since the adoption of this plan or the beginning of such 36-month period; (ii) have been appointed by Harris Corporation; or (iii) have been elected or nominated during such 36-month period by at least a majority of the Board members that belong to the same Class of director as such Board member; and (iv) satisfied one of the above criteria when they were elected or nominated; or a majority of the Board determines that a Change of Control has occurred; or the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company. 24 26,667 640,000 640,000 15,541 50,247 30,000 735,788 Employment agreements are in effect for the other current named executive officers, which provide that if they are terminated without cause or should they resign for good reason or become disabled and they sign a general release they will be entitled to receive the following severance benefits: Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . 12 25,000 300,000 300,000 — 18,072 30,000 348,072 24 25,000 600,000 600,000 14,123 36,145 30,000 680,268 ______________________ (2) (3) (4) salary. by us. (1) The monthly base salary represents the total gross monthly payments to each named executive officer at the current Reflects acceleration of outstanding equity awards as of June 27, 2014. The insurance benefit provided is paid directly to the insurer benefit provider and includes amounts for COBRA. The estimated dollar amounts for outplacement services would be paid directly to an outplacement provider selected • • • • severance payments at their final base salary for a period of 12 months following termination; payment of premiums necessary to continue their group health insurance under COBRA (or to purchase other comparable health coverage on an individual basis if the employee is no longer eligible for COBRA coverage) until the earlier of (i) 12 months; or (ii) the date on which they first became eligible to participate in another employer’s group health insurance plan; the prorated portion of any incentive bonus they would have earned during the incentive bonus period in which their employment was terminated; any equity compensation subject to service-based vesting granted to the executive officer will stop vesting as of their termination date; however, they will be entitled to purchase any vested share(s) of stock that are subject to the outstanding options until the earlier of: (i) 12 months; or (ii) the date on which the applicable option(s) expire; and • outplacement assistance selected and paid for by us. In addition, these agreements provide that if there is a Change of Control, and employment with us is terminated by us without cause or by the employee for good reason within 18 months after the Change of Control and they sign a general release of known and unknown claims in a form satisfactory to us, (i) the severance benefits described shall be increased by an additional 12 months; (ii) they will receive a payment equal to the greater of (a) the average of the annual incentive bonus payments received by them, if any, for the previous three years; or (b) their target incentive bonus for the year in which their 34 35 35 Proxy Statementemployment terminates; and (iii) the vesting of all unvested stock option(s) and unvested equity-compensation awards subject to service-based vesting will accelerate, such that all of such stock option(s) and equity-compensation awards will be fully vested as of the date of their termination/resignation. t n e m e t a t S y x o r P Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% holders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on our review of Forms 3 and 4 received during fiscal year 2014, and Forms 5 (or any written representations) received with respect to fiscal year 2014, we believe that all directors, officers, executive officers and 10% stockholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal year 2014. PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS At the Annual Meeting, directors are being nominated for election to serve until the 2015 Annual Meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified. In the unanticipated event that a nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, all proxies received by the proxy holders will be voted for any subsequent nominee named by the Board to fill the vacancy created by the earlier nominee’s withdrawal from the election. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board is not aware of any director nominee who is unable or will decline to serve as a director. Each of the nominees has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve as a director if elected. Ages are as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Director Nominees Name Title Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chairman of the Board William A. Hasler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . James R. Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director John Mutch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Michael A. Pangia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, President and CEO Robert G. Pearse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director John J. Quicke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lead Independent Director Director Age 67 73 57 58 53 55 65 68 Agreement with Certain Stockholders On January 11, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with Steel Partners Holdings L.P. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Steel Partners”) and Lone Star Value Management, LLC and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Lone Star,” and together with Steel Partners, the “Stockholder Parties”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company agreed to appoint Messrs. Henderson, Mutch, Pearse and Quicke to the Board following the retirements of Messrs. Higgerson, Rau, Sohi and Thompson. In addition, the Company has agreed that its slate of nominees at the Annual Meeting will be Messrs. Kissner, Hasler, Henderson, Mutch, Pangia, Pearse and Quicke and Dr. Stoffel. In connection with entering into the Agreement, Lone Star and its affiliates withdrew their nomination of six candidates to the Board. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Stockholder Parties have agreed to vote for the Board’s slate of nominees for directors at the Annual Meeting. In addition, the Stockholder Parties have agreed, until 30 days prior to the advance notice deadline for the submission of director nominations in respect of the 2015 Annual Meeting (such period, the “Restricted Period”) to customary standstill provisions during that time that provide, among other things, that the Stockholder Parties will not (a) engage in or in any way participate in a solicitation of proxies or consents with respect to the Company; or (b) initiate any shareholder proposals. Prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period, Steel Partners has agreed not to acquire beneficial ownership of more than 24.9% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The Company and Steel Partners have agreed that the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware will not be applicable to Steel Partners unless it acquires more than 24.9% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period, Lone Star has agreed not to acquire beneficial ownership of more than 9.9% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES. PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015 and our Board has ratified such appointment. During fiscal year 2014, KPMG LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm and provided certain tax and other audit related services. See “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees.” Notwithstanding its selection, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If the appointment is not ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee may reconsider whether it should appoint another independent registered public accounting firm. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE’S APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015. 36 36 37 employment terminates; and (iii) the vesting of all unvested stock option(s) and unvested equity-compensation awards subject to service-based vesting will accelerate, such that all of such stock option(s) and equity-compensation awards will be fully vested as of the date of their termination/resignation. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% holders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on our review of Forms 3 and 4 received during fiscal year 2014, and Forms 5 (or any written representations) received with respect to fiscal year 2014, we believe that all directors, officers, executive officers and 10% stockholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal year 2014. PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS At the Annual Meeting, directors are being nominated for election to serve until the 2015 Annual Meeting or until their successors are elected and qualified. In the unanticipated event that a nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, all proxies received by the proxy holders will be voted for any subsequent nominee named by the Board to fill the vacancy created by the earlier nominee’s withdrawal from the election. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board is not aware of any director nominee who is unable or will decline to serve as a director. Each of the nominees has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve as a director if elected. Ages are as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Director Nominees Name Title Age Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chairman of the Board William A. Hasler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director James R. Henderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director John Mutch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Michael A. Pangia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, President and CEO Robert G. Pearse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director John J. Quicke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lead Independent Director 67 73 57 58 53 55 65 68 Agreement with Certain Stockholders On January 11, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with Steel Partners Holdings L.P. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Steel Partners”) and Lone Star Value Management, LLC and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Lone Star,” and together with Steel Partners, the “Stockholder Parties”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company agreed to appoint Messrs. Henderson, Mutch, Pearse and Quicke to the Board following the retirements of Messrs. Higgerson, Rau, Sohi and Thompson. In addition, the Company has agreed that its slate of nominees at the Annual Meeting will be Messrs. Kissner, Hasler, Henderson, Mutch, Pangia, Pearse and Quicke and Dr. Stoffel. In connection with entering into the Agreement, Lone Star and its affiliates withdrew their nomination of six candidates to the Board. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Stockholder Parties have agreed to vote for the Board’s slate of nominees for directors at the Annual Meeting. In addition, the Stockholder Parties have agreed, until 30 days prior to the advance notice deadline for the submission of director nominations in respect of the 2015 Annual Meeting (such period, the “Restricted Period”) to customary standstill provisions during that time that provide, among other things, that the Stockholder Parties will not (a) engage in or in any way participate in a solicitation of proxies or consents with respect to the Company; or (b) initiate any shareholder proposals. Prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period, Steel Partners has agreed not to acquire beneficial ownership of more than 24.9% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The Company and Steel Partners have agreed that the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware will not be applicable to Steel Partners unless it acquires more than 24.9% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Prior to the expiration of the Restricted Period, Lone Star has agreed not to acquire beneficial ownership of more than 9.9% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES. PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015 and our Board has ratified such appointment. During fiscal year 2014, KPMG LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm and provided certain tax and other audit related services. See “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees.” Notwithstanding its selection, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If the appointment is not ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee may reconsider whether it should appoint another independent registered public accounting firm. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE’S APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015. 36 37 37 Proxy Statement PROPOSAL NO. 3 OTHER MATTERS ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION t n e m e t a t S y x o r P A “say on pay” advisory vote is required for all U.S. public companies under Section 14A of the Exchange Act . We are asking stockholders to approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative, in this Proxy Statement. The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the advisory, non-binding vote on executive compensation because it believes that the policies and practices described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section are effective in achieving the Company’s goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance and leadership excellence, aligning the executives’ long-term interests with those of the stockholders and motivating the executives to remain with the Company for long and productive careers. Named executive officer compensation of the past three years reflects amounts of cash and long-term equity awards consistent with periods of economic stress and lower earnings, and equity incentives aligning with our actions to stabilize the Company and to position it for a continued recovery. We urge stockholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables, notes and narrative, which provide detailed information on the Company’s compensation policies and practices and the compensation of our named executive officers. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION. 2014 Annual Report this Proxy Statement. Form 10-K www.aviatnetworks.com. Other Business Our annual report for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 will be available over the Internet and is being mailed with We filed an annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 with the SEC on December 22, 2014. Stockholders may obtain a copy of the annual report on Form 10-K, without charge, by writing to our Corporate Secretary, at the address of our offices located at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, or through our website at The Board is not aware of any other matter that may be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. Should any other matter properly come before the Annual Meeting, your shares of common stock will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders. 38 38 39 ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION 2014 Annual Report PROPOSAL NO. 3 OTHER MATTERS A “say on pay” advisory vote is required for all U.S. public companies under Section 14A of the Exchange Act . We are asking stockholders to approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative, in this Proxy Statement. The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the advisory, non-binding vote on executive compensation because it believes that the policies and practices described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section are effective in achieving the Company’s goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance and leadership excellence, aligning the executives’ long-term interests with those of the stockholders and motivating the executives to remain with the Company for long and productive careers. Named executive officer compensation of the past three years reflects amounts of cash and long-term equity awards consistent with periods of economic stress and lower earnings, and equity incentives aligning with our actions to stabilize the Company and to position it for a continued recovery. We urge stockholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables, notes and narrative, which provide detailed information on the Company’s compensation policies and practices and the compensation of our named executive officers. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION. Our annual report for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 will be available over the Internet and is being mailed with this Proxy Statement. Form 10-K We filed an annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 with the SEC on December 22, 2014. Stockholders may obtain a copy of the annual report on Form 10-K, without charge, by writing to our Corporate Secretary, at the address of our offices located at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, or through our website at www.aviatnetworks.com. Other Business The Board is not aware of any other matter that may be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. Should any other matter properly come before the Annual Meeting, your shares of common stock will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders. 38 39 39 Proxy Statement SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNITED STATES Washington, D.C. 20549 ________________________________ Form 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 or Commission File Number 001-33278 ______________________________ AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ______________________________ (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Delaware 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, California (Address of principal executive offices) 20-5961564 95054 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 567-7000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ Global Select Market) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None _____________________________________________ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company Accelerated filer Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No As of December 27, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $102.7 million based upon the closing price for shares of the registrant’s common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date. For purposes of this calculation, the registrant has assumed that its directors, executive officers and holders of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock are affiliates. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of December 9, 2014 was 62,223,790 shares. None. _________________________________ DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE This page intentionally left blank. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ________________________________ (Mark One) Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission File Number 001-33278 ______________________________ AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ______________________________ Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, California (Address of principal executive offices) 20-5961564 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 95054 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 567-7000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: A n n u a l R e p o r t Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ Global Select Market) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None _____________________________________________ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the No Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company Accelerated filer Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes As of December 27, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $102.7 million based upon the closing price for shares of the registrant’s common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date. For purposes of this calculation, the registrant has assumed that its directors, executive officers and holders of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock are affiliates. No The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of December 9, 2014 was 62,223,790 shares. None. _________________________________ DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K For the Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 Table of Contents Item 1. Item 1A. PART I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unresolved Staff Comments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Legal Proceedings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. t r o p e R l a u n n A PART II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9. Item 9A. Item 9B. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. . . . . . . . . . Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART IV. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules Signatures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schedule II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5 5 14 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 30 43 44 81 81 83 84 84 92 110 113 113 115 115 120 121 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they do not materialize or prove correct, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including statements of, about, concerning or regarding: our plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; our research and development efforts and new product releases and services; trends in revenue; drivers of our business and the markets in which we operate; future economic conditions; performance or outlook and changes in our industry and the markets we serve; the outcome of contingencies; the value of our contract awards; beliefs or expectations; the sufficiency of our cash and our capital needs and expenditures; our intellectual property protection; our compliance with regulatory requirements and the associated expenses; expectations regarding litigation; our intention not to pay cash dividends; the seasonality of our business; the impact of foreign exchange and inflation; taxes; our ongoing business restructuring efforts; and assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “strategy,” “projects,” “targets,” “goals,” “seeing,” “delivering,” “continues,” “forecasts,” “future,” “predict,” “might,” “could,” “potential,” or the negative of these terms, and similar words or expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on estimates reflecting the current beliefs of the senior management of Aviat Networks. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should therefore be considered in light of various important factors, including those set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10- K. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in the forward-looking statements include the following: • material weaknesses identified in our system of internal control and associated remediation efforts and investments and actions needed to remedy those material weaknesses; continued price and margin erosion as a result of increased competition in the microwave transmission industry; the impact of the volume, timing and customer, product and geographic mix of our product orders; our ability to meet financial covenant requirements which could impact our liquidity; our ability to meet projected new product development dates or anticipated cost reductions of new products; our suppliers’ inability to perform and deliver on time as a result of their financial condition, component shortages or other supply chain constraints; customer acceptance of new products; the ability of our subcontractors to timely perform; continued weakness in the global economy affecting customer spending; retention of our key personnel; our ability to manage and maintain key customer relationships; uncertain economic conditions in the telecommunications sector combined with operator and supplier consolidation; the timing of our receipt of payment for products or services from our customers; our failure to protect our intellectual property rights or defend against intellectual property infringement claims by others; the results of our restructuring efforts; the effects of currency and interest rate risks; and the impact of political turmoil in countries where we have significant business. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Other factors besides those listed here also could adversely affect us. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding factors that may cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K For the Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 Table of Contents Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9. Item 9A. Item 9B. Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. PART I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unresolved Staff Comments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Legal Proceedings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. . . . . . . . . . Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART IV. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules Signatures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Schedule II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5 14 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 30 43 44 81 81 83 84 84 92 110 113 113 115 115 120 121 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they do not materialize or prove correct, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including statements of, about, concerning or regarding: our plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; our research and development efforts and new product releases and services; trends in revenue; drivers of our business and the markets in which we operate; future economic conditions; performance or outlook and changes in our industry and the markets we serve; the outcome of contingencies; the value of our contract awards; beliefs or expectations; the sufficiency of our cash and our capital needs and expenditures; our intellectual property protection; our compliance with regulatory requirements and the associated expenses; expectations regarding litigation; our intention not to pay cash dividends; the seasonality of our business; the impact of foreign exchange and inflation; taxes; our ongoing business restructuring efforts; and assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “strategy,” “projects,” “targets,” “goals,” “seeing,” “delivering,” “continues,” “forecasts,” “future,” “predict,” “might,” “could,” “potential,” or the negative of these terms, and similar words or expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on estimates reflecting the current beliefs of the senior management of Aviat Networks. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should therefore be considered in light of various important factors, including those set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10- K. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in the forward-looking statements include the following: A n n u a l R e p o r t • material weaknesses identified in our system of internal control and associated remediation efforts and investments and actions needed to remedy those material weaknesses; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • continued price and margin erosion as a result of increased competition in the microwave transmission industry; the impact of the volume, timing and customer, product and geographic mix of our product orders; our ability to meet financial covenant requirements which could impact our liquidity; our ability to meet projected new product development dates or anticipated cost reductions of new products; our suppliers’ inability to perform and deliver on time as a result of their financial condition, component shortages or other supply chain constraints; customer acceptance of new products; the ability of our subcontractors to timely perform; continued weakness in the global economy affecting customer spending; retention of our key personnel; our ability to manage and maintain key customer relationships; uncertain economic conditions in the telecommunications sector combined with operator and supplier consolidation; the timing of our receipt of payment for products or services from our customers; our failure to protect our intellectual property rights or defend against intellectual property infringement claims by others; the results of our restructuring efforts; the effects of currency and interest rate risks; and the impact of political turmoil in countries where we have significant business. Other factors besides those listed here also could adversely affect us. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding factors that may cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 3 You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s opinions only as of the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, along with provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we undertake no obligation, other than as imposed by law, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect further developments or information obtained after the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document. PART I Item 1. Business t r o p e R l a u n n A 4 Aviat Networks, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is a global supplier of microwave networking solutions, backed by an extensive suite of professional services and support. Aviat Networks, Inc. may be referred to as “the Company,” “AVNW,” “Aviat Networks,” “we,” “us” and “our” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were incorporated in Delaware in 2006 to combine the businesses of Harris Corporation’s Microwave Communications Division (“MCD”) and Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”). On January 28, 2010, we changed our corporate name from Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. to Aviat Networks, Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, and our telephone number is (408) 567-7000. Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol AVNW. As of June 27, 2014, we employed approximately 960 people, compared with approximately 1,000 people as of June 28, 2013. Overview and Description of the Business We design, manufacture and sell a range of wireless networking products, solutions and services to mobile and fixed public network operators, private network operators, government agencies, transportation, energy and utility companies, public safety agencies and broadcast network operators around the world. We sell products and services directly to our customers and also use agents and distributors. Our products utilize microwave and millimeter wave technologies to create point to point wireless links for short, medium and long distance interconnections. Our products incorporate Ethernet switching and IP routing capabilities to form complete networking solutions. We also provide network management software tools to enable our customers to deploy, monitor and manage our systems; third party equipment such as antennas, routers, optical transmission equipment and other equipment necessary to build and deploy a complete telecommunications transmission network. We provide a full suite of professional services. Our wireless systems deliver urban, suburban, regional and country-wide communications links as the primary alternative to fiber optic connections. In dense urban and suburban areas, short range wireless solutions are faster to deploy and lower cost per mile than new fiber deployments. In developing nations, fiber infrastructure is scarce and wireless systems are used for both long and short distance connections. Wireless systems also have advantages over optical fiber in areas with rugged terrain, and to provide connections over bodies of water such as between islands or even oil and gas production platforms. Revenue from our North America and international regions represented approximately 41% and 59%, respectively, of our revenue in fiscal 2014, 38% and 62%, respectively, of our revenue in fiscal 2013, and 37% and 63%, respectively, of our revenue in fiscal 2012. Information about our revenue attributable to our geographic regions is set forth in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 11 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that future demand for microwave and millimeter wave transmission systems will be influenced by a number of factors across several market segments. Market Overview Mobile Networks As Mobile Networks expand, add subscribers and increase the number of wirelessly connected devices, sensors and machines, they require investment in backhaul infrastructure. Whether Mobile Network operators choose to self- build this backhaul infrastructure or lease backhaul services from other network providers, the evolution of the network drives demand for transmission technologies such as microwave and millimeter wave wireless backhaul. Within this overall scope there are multiple individual drivers for investment in backhaul infrastructure. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s opinions only as of the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, along with provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we undertake no obligation, other than as imposed by law, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect further developments or information obtained after the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document. PART I Item 1. Business Aviat Networks, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is a global supplier of microwave networking solutions, backed by an extensive suite of professional services and support. Aviat Networks, Inc. may be referred to as “the Company,” “AVNW,” “Aviat Networks,” “we,” “us” and “our” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were incorporated in Delaware in 2006 to combine the businesses of Harris Corporation’s Microwave Communications Division (“MCD”) and Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”). On January 28, 2010, we changed our corporate name from Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. to Aviat Networks, Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, California 95054, and our telephone number is (408) 567-7000. Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol AVNW. As of June 27, 2014, we employed approximately 960 people, compared with approximately 1,000 people as of June 28, 2013. Overview and Description of the Business We design, manufacture and sell a range of wireless networking products, solutions and services to mobile and fixed public network operators, private network operators, government agencies, transportation, energy and utility companies, public safety agencies and broadcast network operators around the world. We sell products and services directly to our customers and also use agents and distributors. Our products utilize microwave and millimeter wave technologies to create point to point wireless links for short, medium and long distance interconnections. Our products incorporate Ethernet switching and IP routing capabilities to form complete networking solutions. We also provide network management software tools to enable our customers to deploy, monitor and manage our systems; third party equipment such as antennas, routers, optical transmission equipment and other equipment necessary to build and deploy a complete telecommunications transmission network. We provide a full suite of professional services. A n n u a l R e p o r t Our wireless systems deliver urban, suburban, regional and country-wide communications links as the primary alternative to fiber optic connections. In dense urban and suburban areas, short range wireless solutions are faster to deploy and lower cost per mile than new fiber deployments. In developing nations, fiber infrastructure is scarce and wireless systems are used for both long and short distance connections. Wireless systems also have advantages over optical fiber in areas with rugged terrain, and to provide connections over bodies of water such as between islands or even oil and gas production platforms. Revenue from our North America and international regions represented approximately 41% and 59%, respectively, of our revenue in fiscal 2014, 38% and 62%, respectively, of our revenue in fiscal 2013, and 37% and 63%, respectively, of our revenue in fiscal 2012. Information about our revenue attributable to our geographic regions is set forth in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 11 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Market Overview We believe that future demand for microwave and millimeter wave transmission systems will be influenced by a number of factors across several market segments. Mobile Networks As Mobile Networks expand, add subscribers and increase the number of wirelessly connected devices, sensors and machines, they require investment in backhaul infrastructure. Whether Mobile Network operators choose to self- build this backhaul infrastructure or lease backhaul services from other network providers, the evolution of the network drives demand for transmission technologies such as microwave and millimeter wave wireless backhaul. Within this overall scope there are multiple individual drivers for investment in backhaul infrastructure. 5 t r o p e R l a u n n A • New RAN Technologies. The evolution of Mobile Radio Access Network (“RAN”) technologies from 2G to 3G (HSPA) or 4G (HSPA+ and LTE) technologies is providing subscribers with faster speed access to the internet, social media, and video streaming services. The rapid increases in data to be transported through the RAN and across the backhaul infrastructure drives requirements for higher data transport links necessitating upgrades to or replacement of the existing backhaul infrastructure. • Subscriber Growth. Traffic on the backhaul infrastructure increases as the number of unique subscribers grows. • Connected Devices. The number of devices connected to the Mobile Network is far greater than the number of unique subscribers due to demand for multiple mobile device types. Wireless sensors and machines are enabling new revenue streams for Mobile Network operators in healthcare, agriculture, transportation and education, all of which increases the data traffic crossing the backhaul infrastructure. • RAN Capacity. RAN frequency spectrum is a limited resource and shared between all of the devices and users within the coverage area of each base station. Meeting the combined demand of increasing subscribers and devices will requires the deployment of much higher densities of base stations with smaller and smaller range (small cells) each requiring backhaul. • Geographic Coverage. Expanding the geographic area covered by a Mobile Network requires the deployment of additional Cellular Base Station sites. Each additional base station site also needs to be connected to the core of the Mobile Network through expansion of the backhaul system. • License Mandates. Mobile Operators are licensed telecommunications service providers. Licenses will typically mandate a minimum geographic footprint within a specific period of time and/or a minimum proportion of a national or regional population served. This can pace backhaul infrastructure investment and cause periodic spikes in demand. • Evolution to IP. Network Infrastructure capacity, efficiency and flexibility is greatly enhanced by transitioning from legacy SDH (synchronous digital hierarchy) / SONET (synchronous optical network) / TDM (time division multiplexing) to IP (internet protocol) infrastructure. Our products offer integrated IP transport and routing functionality increasing the value they bring in the backhaul network. • Expansion of Offered Services. Mobile Network operators especially in emerging markets now own and operate the most modern communications networks within their respective regions. These network assets can be further leveraged to provide high speed broadband services to fixed locations such as Small Medium and Large Business Enterprises, Airports, Hotels, Hospitals, and Educational institutions. Microwave and Millimeter Wave backhaul is ideally suited to providing high speed broadband connections to these end points due to the lack of fiber infrastructure. Other Vertical Markets In addition to mobile backhaul, we see increasing demand for microwave technology in other vertical markets, including utility, public safety, financial institution and broadcast. • Many utility companies around the world are actively investing in Smart Grid solutions and energy demand management, which drive the need for network modernization and increased capacity of networks. • In the public safety vertical market investment in network modernization can significantly enhance the capabilities of security agencies. Improving border patrol effectiveness, enabling interoperable emergency communications services for local or state police, providing access to timely information from centralized databases, or utilizing video and imaging devices at the scene of an incident requires a high bandwidth and reliable network. The mission critical nature of Public Safety and National security networks can require that these networks are built, operated and maintained independently of other public network infrastructure and microwave is very well suited to this environment because it is a cost-effective alternative to fiber. • New opportunities have emerged in some other niche markets in non-mobile sectors as well, such as the low latency application for high frequency trading in financial industry, for which demand has been growing at a higher rate than the wireless industry as a whole. With lower latency and shorter line of sight distance between transmission sites than fiber, microwave technology has been selected over fiber by more and more financial institutions for such applications. There is also the broadcast market, where terrestrial TV broadcasting is progressively going digital on a global basis and has presented new opportunities for microwave vendors. 6 These factors are combining to create a range of opportunities for continued investment in backhaul and transport networks favoring microwave and millimeter wave technologies. As we focus on our execution of the future generations of our technology, our goal is to make wireless a viable choice for an ever broadening range of network types. Strategy Over the past year, we made significant strides in updating our entire product portfolio with new microwave, millimeter wave and IP Routing solutions. We introduced the first versions of our CTR (converged transport router) 8000 platform with both CTR 8440 and CTR 8540 models. The CTR is a transformational microwave product line since it efficiently integrates microwave transport and IP routing in a single solution. We also introduced our first millimeter wave solution, the WTM3300, in a very small form factor suited to dense urban and small cell applications. We continued to develop our professional services portfolio as a key to our long term strategy and differentiation. During the year, we added managed network services to a key customer in Africa and expanded the number of customer networks managed from our North America Network Operations Center. Our strategy includes partnering with companies with technical expertise in areas outside of our core competencies to meet our customers' demand for an end-to-end solution. Our partner product strategy enables us to go beyond wireless transmission to combat the vendor consolidation trend whereby customers are “buying more from fewer vendors” and in doing so providing expanding market share opportunity. A comprehensive solutions portfolio comprised of our wireless product and intelligent partner products can allow us to compete with vendors that offer turnkey solution portfolios and serve to focus our research and development (“R&D”) efforts on core competency wireless innovations. Having a broader portfolio will enable us to further differentiate our offerings from other independent microwave equipment suppliers. We expect to continue to serve and expand upon our existing customer base and develop business with new customers. We have sold more than 1,000,000 microwave radios in over 140 countries and are present in more than 350 mobile networks worldwide. We intend to leverage our customer base, our longstanding presence in many countries, our distribution channels, our comprehensive product line, our superior customer service and our turnkey solution capability to continue to sell existing and new products and services to current and future customers. Products and Solutions We offer a comprehensive product and solutions portfolio that meets the needs of service providers and network operators in every region of the world and addresses a broad range of applications, frequencies, capacities and network topologies. Our product categories include point-to-point microwave and millimeter wave radios that are licensed (subject to local frequency regulatory requirements), lightly-licensed and license-exempt (operating in license-exempt frequencies), and element and network management software. In addition, we provide a full suite of professional services enabling us to deliver end-to-end turnkey networks, including complete design, deployment, maintenance, and managed services, while being an attentive and adaptable partner for our customers — a key competitive differentiator for us. • Broad product and solution portfolio. We offer a comprehensive suite of wireless transmission networking systems for microwave and millimeter-wave networking applications. Our solution consists of tailored offerings of our own wireless products and our own integrated ancillary equipment or that of other manufacturers and providers of element and network management systems and professional services. These solutions address a wide range of transmission frequencies, ranging from 2.4 MHz to 90 GHz, and a wide range of transmission capacities, ranging up to 4 Gbps and beyond. The major product families included in these solutions are CTR 8000, Eclipse, WTM 3000, WTM 6000 and ProVision, our network management software. • Low total cost of ownership. Our wireless-based solutions offer a relatively low total cost of ownership, including savings on the combined costs of initial acquisition, installation and ongoing operation and maintenance. Our latest generation system designs reduce rack space requirements, require less power, are software-configurable to reduce spare parts requirements, and are simple to install, operate, upgrade and maintain. Our advanced wireless features can also enable operators to save on related costs, including spectrum fees and tower rental fees. • Futureproof network. Our solutions are designed to protect the network operator’s investment by incorporating software-configurable capacity upgrades and plug-in modules that provide a smooth migration path to Carrier Ethernet and IP/MPLS-based networking, without the need for costly equipment • New RAN Technologies. The evolution of Mobile Radio Access Network (“RAN”) technologies from 2G to 3G (HSPA) or 4G (HSPA+ and LTE) technologies is providing subscribers with faster speed access to the internet, social media, and video streaming services. The rapid increases in data to be transported through the RAN and across the backhaul infrastructure drives requirements for higher data transport links necessitating upgrades to or replacement of the existing backhaul infrastructure. • Subscriber Growth. Traffic on the backhaul infrastructure increases as the number of unique subscribers grows. • Connected Devices. The number of devices connected to the Mobile Network is far greater than the number of unique subscribers due to demand for multiple mobile device types. Wireless sensors and machines are enabling new revenue streams for Mobile Network operators in healthcare, agriculture, transportation and education, all of which increases the data traffic crossing the backhaul infrastructure. • RAN Capacity. RAN frequency spectrum is a limited resource and shared between all of the devices and users within the coverage area of each base station. Meeting the combined demand of increasing subscribers and devices will requires the deployment of much higher densities of base stations with smaller and smaller range (small cells) each requiring backhaul. • Geographic Coverage. Expanding the geographic area covered by a Mobile Network requires the deployment of additional Cellular Base Station sites. Each additional base station site also needs to be connected to the core of the Mobile Network through expansion of the backhaul system. • License Mandates. Mobile Operators are licensed telecommunications service providers. Licenses will typically mandate a minimum geographic footprint within a specific period of time and/or a minimum proportion of a national or regional population served. This can pace backhaul infrastructure investment and cause periodic spikes in demand. • Evolution to IP. Network Infrastructure capacity, efficiency and flexibility is greatly enhanced by transitioning from legacy SDH (synchronous digital hierarchy) / SONET (synchronous optical network) / TDM (time division multiplexing) to IP (internet protocol) infrastructure. Our products offer integrated IP transport and routing functionality increasing the value they bring in the backhaul network. • Expansion of Offered Services. Mobile Network operators especially in emerging markets now own and operate the most modern communications networks within their respective regions. These network assets can be further leveraged to provide high speed broadband services to fixed locations such as Small Medium and Large Business Enterprises, Airports, Hotels, Hospitals, and Educational institutions. Microwave and Millimeter Wave backhaul is ideally suited to providing high speed broadband connections to these end points due to the lack of fiber infrastructure. Other Vertical Markets In addition to mobile backhaul, we see increasing demand for microwave technology in other vertical markets, including utility, public safety, financial institution and broadcast. • Many utility companies around the world are actively investing in Smart Grid solutions and energy demand management, which drive the need for network modernization and increased capacity of networks. • In the public safety vertical market investment in network modernization can significantly enhance the capabilities of security agencies. Improving border patrol effectiveness, enabling interoperable emergency communications services for local or state police, providing access to timely information from centralized databases, or utilizing video and imaging devices at the scene of an incident requires a high bandwidth and reliable network. The mission critical nature of Public Safety and National security networks can require that these networks are built, operated and maintained independently of other public network infrastructure and microwave is very well suited to this environment because it is a cost-effective alternative to fiber. • New opportunities have emerged in some other niche markets in non-mobile sectors as well, such as the low latency application for high frequency trading in financial industry, for which demand has been growing at a higher rate than the wireless industry as a whole. With lower latency and shorter line of sight distance between transmission sites than fiber, microwave technology has been selected over fiber by more and more financial institutions for such applications. There is also the broadcast market, where terrestrial TV broadcasting is progressively going digital on a global basis and has presented new opportunities for microwave vendors. These factors are combining to create a range of opportunities for continued investment in backhaul and transport networks favoring microwave and millimeter wave technologies. As we focus on our execution of the future generations of our technology, our goal is to make wireless a viable choice for an ever broadening range of network types. Strategy Over the past year, we made significant strides in updating our entire product portfolio with new microwave, millimeter wave and IP Routing solutions. We introduced the first versions of our CTR (converged transport router) 8000 platform with both CTR 8440 and CTR 8540 models. The CTR is a transformational microwave product line since it efficiently integrates microwave transport and IP routing in a single solution. We also introduced our first millimeter wave solution, the WTM3300, in a very small form factor suited to dense urban and small cell applications. We continued to develop our professional services portfolio as a key to our long term strategy and differentiation. During the year, we added managed network services to a key customer in Africa and expanded the number of customer networks managed from our North America Network Operations Center. Our strategy includes partnering with companies with technical expertise in areas outside of our core competencies to meet our customers' demand for an end-to-end solution. Our partner product strategy enables us to go beyond wireless transmission to combat the vendor consolidation trend whereby customers are “buying more from fewer vendors” and in doing so providing expanding market share opportunity. A comprehensive solutions portfolio comprised of our wireless product and intelligent partner products can allow us to compete with vendors that offer turnkey solution portfolios and serve to focus our research and development (“R&D”) efforts on core competency wireless innovations. Having a broader portfolio will enable us to further differentiate our offerings from other independent microwave equipment suppliers. We expect to continue to serve and expand upon our existing customer base and develop business with new customers. We have sold more than 1,000,000 microwave radios in over 140 countries and are present in more than 350 mobile networks worldwide. We intend to leverage our customer base, our longstanding presence in many countries, our distribution channels, our comprehensive product line, our superior customer service and our turnkey solution capability to continue to sell existing and new products and services to current and future customers. A n n u a l R e p o r t Products and Solutions We offer a comprehensive product and solutions portfolio that meets the needs of service providers and network operators in every region of the world and addresses a broad range of applications, frequencies, capacities and network topologies. Our product categories include point-to-point microwave and millimeter wave radios that are licensed (subject to local frequency regulatory requirements), lightly-licensed and license-exempt (operating in license-exempt frequencies), and element and network management software. In addition, we provide a full suite of professional services enabling us to deliver end-to-end turnkey networks, including complete design, deployment, maintenance, and managed services, while being an attentive and adaptable partner for our customers — a key competitive differentiator for us. • Broad product and solution portfolio. We offer a comprehensive suite of wireless transmission networking systems for microwave and millimeter-wave networking applications. Our solution consists of tailored offerings of our own wireless products and our own integrated ancillary equipment or that of other manufacturers and providers of element and network management systems and professional services. These solutions address a wide range of transmission frequencies, ranging from 2.4 MHz to 90 GHz, and a wide range of transmission capacities, ranging up to 4 Gbps and beyond. The major product families included in these solutions are CTR 8000, Eclipse, WTM 3000, WTM 6000 and ProVision, our network management software. • Low total cost of ownership. Our wireless-based solutions offer a relatively low total cost of ownership, including savings on the combined costs of initial acquisition, installation and ongoing operation and maintenance. Our latest generation system designs reduce rack space requirements, require less power, are software-configurable to reduce spare parts requirements, and are simple to install, operate, upgrade and maintain. Our advanced wireless features can also enable operators to save on related costs, including spectrum fees and tower rental fees. • Futureproof network. Our solutions are designed to protect the network operator’s investment by incorporating software-configurable capacity upgrades and plug-in modules that provide a smooth migration path to Carrier Ethernet and IP/MPLS-based networking, without the need for costly equipment 7 substitutions and additions. Our products include key technologies we believe will be needed by operators for their network evolution to support new broadband services. manufacturers for all products. We continue to perform our system integration and customer acceptance and testing in an Aviat Networks facility co-located with one of our contract manufacturers in the United States. t r o p e R l a u n n A • Flexible, easily configurable products. We use flexible architectures with a high level of software configurable features. This design approach produces high-performance products with reusable components while at the same time allowing for a manufacturing strategy with a high degree of flexibility, improved cost and reduced time-to-market. The software features of our products offer our customers a greater degree of flexibility in installing, operating and maintaining their networks. • Comprehensive network management. We offer a range of flexible network management solutions, from element management to enterprise-wide network management and service assurance that we can optimize to work with our wireless systems. • Complete professional services. In addition to our product offerings, we provide network planning and design, site surveys and builds, systems integration, installation, maintenance, network monitoring, training, customer service and many other professional services. Our services cover the entire evaluation, purchase, deployment and operational cycle and enable us to be one of the few complete turnkey solution providers in the industry. Business Operations Sales and Service We believe that a direct and continuing relationship with service providers is a competitive advantage in attracting new customers and satisfying existing ones. As a result, we offer our products and services through our own direct sales, service and support organization, which allows us to closely monitor the needs of our customers. We have offices in Canada and the United States in North America; Brazil and Mexico in Central and South America; Slovenia, Poland, France, Russia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in Europe; Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Algeria and South Africa in Africa; the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Lebanon in the Middle East; and Australia, India, New Zealand, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand in the Asia Pacific region. Our local offices provide us with a better understanding of our customers’ needs and enable us to respond to local issues and unique local requirements. We also have informal, and in some cases formal, relationships with original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and system integrators. Such relationships increase our ability to pursue a limited number of major contract awards each year. In addition, such relationships provide our customers with easier access to financing and integrated system providers with a variety of equipment and service capabilities. In selected countries, we also market our products through independent agents and distributors, as well as through system integrators. We use indirect sales channels, including dealers, distributors and sales representatives, in the marketing and sale of some lines of products and equipment on a global basis. These independent representatives may buy for resale or, in some cases, solicit orders from commercial or governmental customers for direct sales by us. Prices to the ultimate customer in many instances may be recommended or established by the independent representative and may be above or below our list prices. These independent representatives generally receive a discount from our list prices and are free to set the final sales prices paid by the customer. We have repair and service centers in India, Nigeria, Ghana, Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, the United Kingdom and the United States. We have customer service and support personnel who provide customers with training, installation, technical support, maintenance and other services on systems under contract. We install and maintain customer equipment directly in some cases and contract with third-party service providers in other cases, depending on the equipment being installed and customer requirements. The specific terms and conditions of our product warranties vary depending upon the product sold and country in which we do business. On direct sales, warranty periods generally start on the delivery date and continue for one to three years. Manufacturing Our global manufacturing strategy is an entirely outsourced manufacturing model using multiple contract manufacturers in both the United States and Asia locations. Our strategy is to use a select number of contract 8 In accordance with our global logistics requirements and customer geographic distribution, we are engaged with contract manufacturing partners in Asia and the United States. All manufacturing operations have been certified to International Standards Organization 9001, a recognized international quality standard. We have also been certified to the TL 9000 standard, a telecommunication industry-specific quality system standard. Backlog Our backlog by geographic region is as follows: North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total backlog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 (In millions) 112.0 97.3 209.3 $ $ 79.4 79.1 158.5 Our backlog consists primarily of contracts or purchase orders for both product and service deliveries scheduled within the next 12 months and extended service warranties. We regularly review our backlog to ensure that our customers continue to honor their purchase commitments and have the financial means to purchase and deploy our products and services in accordance with the terms of their purchase contracts. We expect to substantially fill the backlog as of June 27, 2014 during fiscal 2015, but we cannot be assured that this will occur. Product orders in our current backlog are subject to changes in delivery schedules or to cancellation at the option of the purchaser without significant penalty. Accordingly, although useful for scheduling production, backlog as of any particular date may not be a reliable measure of sales for any future period because of the timing of orders, delivery intervals, customer and product mix and the possibility of changes in delivery schedules and additions or cancellations of orders. The backlog figures exclude advance payments and unearned income amounts. As of June 27, 2014, the Mobile Telephone Networks Group (“MTN Group”) in Africa accounted for 16% of our total backlog and no other customers accounted for 10% or more of our total backlog. Principal customers for our products and services include domestic and international wireless/mobile service providers, OEMs, and private network users such as public safety agencies, government institutions, and utility, pipeline, railroad and other industrial enterprises that operate wireless networks. During fiscal 2014, the MTN Group in Africa accounted for 17% of our total revenue compared with 25% in fiscal 2013 and 17% in fiscal 2012. We have entered into separate and distinct contracts with MTN Group as well as separate arrangements with MTN Group subsidiaries. During fiscal 2013, revenue from Verizon Wireless accounted for 11% of our total revenue. The loss of all or a substantial portion of MTN Group's business or of Verizon Wireless' business could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. Although we have a large customer base, during any given fiscal year or quarter a small number of customers may account for a significant portion of our revenue. In certain circumstances, we sell our products to service providers through OEMs, which provide the service providers with access to financing and in some instances, protection from fluctuations in international currency exchange rates. Customers Competition The microwave and millimeter wave wireless networking business is a specialized segment of the wireless telecommunications industry that is sensitive to technological advancements and is extremely competitive. Our principal competitors include business units of large mobile and IP network infrastructure manufacturers such as Ericsson, Huawei, NEC and Alcatel-Lucent, as well as a number of other smaller public and private microwave specialists companies such as Ceragon, DragonWave and SIAE. Some of our larger competitors may have greater name recognition, broader product lines (some including non- wireless telecommunications equipment and managed services), a larger installed base of products and longer-standing substitutions and additions. Our products include key technologies we believe will be needed by operators for their network evolution to support new broadband services. manufacturers for all products. We continue to perform our system integration and customer acceptance and testing in an Aviat Networks facility co-located with one of our contract manufacturers in the United States. • Flexible, easily configurable products. We use flexible architectures with a high level of software configurable features. This design approach produces high-performance products with reusable components while at the same time allowing for a manufacturing strategy with a high degree of flexibility, improved cost and reduced time-to-market. The software features of our products offer our customers a greater degree of flexibility in installing, operating and maintaining their networks. • Comprehensive network management. We offer a range of flexible network management solutions, from element management to enterprise-wide network management and service assurance that we can optimize to work with our wireless systems. • Complete professional services. In addition to our product offerings, we provide network planning and design, site surveys and builds, systems integration, installation, maintenance, network monitoring, training, customer service and many other professional services. Our services cover the entire evaluation, purchase, deployment and operational cycle and enable us to be one of the few complete turnkey solution providers in the industry. Business Operations Sales and Service We believe that a direct and continuing relationship with service providers is a competitive advantage in attracting new customers and satisfying existing ones. As a result, we offer our products and services through our own direct sales, service and support organization, which allows us to closely monitor the needs of our customers. We have offices in Canada and the United States in North America; Brazil and Mexico in Central and South America; Slovenia, Poland, France, Russia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in Europe; Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Algeria and South Africa in Africa; the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Lebanon in the Middle East; and Australia, India, New Zealand, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand in the Asia Pacific region. Our local offices provide us with a better understanding of our customers’ needs and enable us to respond to local issues and unique local requirements. We also have informal, and in some cases formal, relationships with original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and system integrators. Such relationships increase our ability to pursue a limited number of major contract awards each year. In addition, such relationships provide our customers with easier access to financing and integrated system providers with a variety of equipment and service capabilities. In selected countries, we also market our products through independent agents and distributors, as well as through system integrators. We use indirect sales channels, including dealers, distributors and sales representatives, in the marketing and sale of some lines of products and equipment on a global basis. These independent representatives may buy for resale or, in some cases, solicit orders from commercial or governmental customers for direct sales by us. Prices to the ultimate customer in many instances may be recommended or established by the independent representative and may be above or below our list prices. These independent representatives generally receive a discount from our list prices and are free to set the final sales prices paid by the customer. We have repair and service centers in India, Nigeria, Ghana, Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, the United Kingdom and the United States. We have customer service and support personnel who provide customers with training, installation, technical support, maintenance and other services on systems under contract. We install and maintain customer equipment directly in some cases and contract with third-party service providers in other cases, depending on the equipment being installed and customer requirements. The specific terms and conditions of our product warranties vary depending upon the product sold and country in which we do business. On direct sales, warranty periods generally start on the delivery date and continue for one to three years. Manufacturing Our global manufacturing strategy is an entirely outsourced manufacturing model using multiple contract manufacturers in both the United States and Asia locations. Our strategy is to use a select number of contract In accordance with our global logistics requirements and customer geographic distribution, we are engaged with contract manufacturing partners in Asia and the United States. All manufacturing operations have been certified to International Standards Organization 9001, a recognized international quality standard. We have also been certified to the TL 9000 standard, a telecommunication industry-specific quality system standard. Backlog Our backlog by geographic region is as follows: North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total backlog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 (In millions) 112.0 97.3 209.3 $ $ 79.4 79.1 158.5 Our backlog consists primarily of contracts or purchase orders for both product and service deliveries scheduled within the next 12 months and extended service warranties. We regularly review our backlog to ensure that our customers continue to honor their purchase commitments and have the financial means to purchase and deploy our products and services in accordance with the terms of their purchase contracts. We expect to substantially fill the backlog as of June 27, 2014 during fiscal 2015, but we cannot be assured that this will occur. Product orders in our current backlog are subject to changes in delivery schedules or to cancellation at the option of the purchaser without significant penalty. Accordingly, although useful for scheduling production, backlog as of any particular date may not be a reliable measure of sales for any future period because of the timing of orders, delivery intervals, customer and product mix and the possibility of changes in delivery schedules and additions or cancellations of orders. The backlog figures exclude advance payments and unearned income amounts. As of June 27, 2014, the Mobile Telephone Networks Group (“MTN Group”) in Africa accounted for 16% of our total backlog and no other customers accounted for 10% or more of our total backlog. A n n u a l R e p o r t Customers Principal customers for our products and services include domestic and international wireless/mobile service providers, OEMs, and private network users such as public safety agencies, government institutions, and utility, pipeline, railroad and other industrial enterprises that operate wireless networks. During fiscal 2014, the MTN Group in Africa accounted for 17% of our total revenue compared with 25% in fiscal 2013 and 17% in fiscal 2012. We have entered into separate and distinct contracts with MTN Group as well as separate arrangements with MTN Group subsidiaries. During fiscal 2013, revenue from Verizon Wireless accounted for 11% of our total revenue. The loss of all or a substantial portion of MTN Group's business or of Verizon Wireless' business could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. Although we have a large customer base, during any given fiscal year or quarter a small number of customers may account for a significant portion of our revenue. In certain circumstances, we sell our products to service providers through OEMs, which provide the service providers with access to financing and in some instances, protection from fluctuations in international currency exchange rates. Competition The microwave and millimeter wave wireless networking business is a specialized segment of the wireless telecommunications industry that is sensitive to technological advancements and is extremely competitive. Our principal competitors include business units of large mobile and IP network infrastructure manufacturers such as Ericsson, Huawei, NEC and Alcatel-Lucent, as well as a number of other smaller public and private microwave specialists companies such as Ceragon, DragonWave and SIAE. Some of our larger competitors may have greater name recognition, broader product lines (some including non- wireless telecommunications equipment and managed services), a larger installed base of products and longer-standing 9 customer relationships. They may from time to time leverage their extensive overall portfolios into completely outsourced and managed network offerings restricting opportunities for specialist suppliers. In addition, some competitors may offer seller financing, which can be a competitive advantage under certain economic climates. issues causing short-term material shortages are within the normal frequency and impact range experienced by high-tech manufacturing companies. They are due primarily to the highly technical nature of many of our purchased components. Looking ahead, we anticipate standard lead times for our raw materials and supplies. Some of our larger competitors may also act as systems integrators through which we sometimes distribute and sell products and services to end users. Patents and Other Intellectual Property t r o p e R l a u n n A The smaller independent private and public specialist competitors typically leverage new technologies and low products costs, but are generally less capable of offering a complete solution including professional services, especially in the North America and Africa regions which form the majority of our addressed market. We concentrate on market opportunities that we believe are compatible with our resources, overall technological capabilities and objectives. Principal competitive factors are cost-effectiveness, product quality and reliability, technological capabilities, service, ability to meet delivery schedules and the effectiveness of dealers in international areas. We believe that the combination of our network and systems engineering support and service, global reach, technological innovation, agility and close collaborative relationships with our customers are the key competitive strengths for us. However, customers may still make decisions based primarily on factors such as price, financing terms and/or past or existing relationships, where it may be difficult for us to compete effectively or profitably. Research and Development We believe that our ability to enhance our current products, develop and introduce new products on a timely basis, maintain technological competitiveness and meet customer requirements is essential to our success. Accordingly, we allocate, and intend to continue to allocate, a significant portion of our resources to research and development efforts in two major product areas: backhaul solutions and network management systems. In addition, we are investing in key innovation that will help separate these products from the competition. The majority of such research and development resources will be used for point-to-point digital microwave radio systems for access, backhaul, trunking and license- exempt applications. Our research and development expenditures totaled $35.5 million, or 10.3% of revenue, in fiscal 2014, $39.4 million, or 8.4% of revenue, in fiscal 2013, and $36.0 million, or 8.1% of revenue, in fiscal 2012. Research and development are primarily directed to the development of new products and to building technological capability. We are an industry innovator and intend to continue to focus significant resources on product development in an effort to maintain our competitiveness and support our entry into new markets. We maintain development programs intended to result in new products, such as additions to our WTM3000, Eclipse and new CTR product platforms. Our product development teams numbered 195 employees as of June 27, 2014, and were located in Santa Clara, California; Wellington, New Zealand; Singapore; Ljubljana, Slovenia; and Montreal, Canada. Raw Materials and Supplies Because of the range of our products and services, as well as the wide geographic dispersion of our facilities, we use numerous sources for the wide array of raw materials needed for our operations and for our products, such as electronic components, printed circuit boards, metals and plastics. We are dependent upon suppliers and subcontractors for a large number of components and subsystems and upon the ability of our suppliers and subcontractors to adhere to customer or regulatory materials restrictions and meet performance and quality specifications and delivery schedules. Our strategy for procuring raw material and supplies includes dual sourcing on strategic assemblies and components. In general, we believe this reduces our risk with regard to the potential financial difficulties in our supply base. In some instances, we are dependent upon one or a few sources, either because of the specialized nature of a particular item or because of local content preference requirements pursuant to which we operate on a given project. Examples of sole or limited source categories include metal fabrications and castings, for which we own the tooling and therefore limit our supplier relationships, and MMICs (a type of integrated circuit used in manufacturing microwave radios), which we procure at volume discount from a single source. Our supply chain plan includes mitigation plans for alternative manufacturing sources and identified alternate suppliers. Although we have been affected by performance issues of some of our suppliers and subcontractors, we have not been materially adversely affected by the inability to obtain raw materials or products. In general, any performance 10 We consider our patents and other intellectual property rights, in the aggregate, to constitute an important asset. We own a portfolio of patents, trade secrets, know-how, confidential information, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property. We also license intellectual property to and from third parties. As of August 22, 2014, we held 143 U.S. patents and 113 international patents and had 60 U.S. patent applications pending and 113 international patent applications pending. We do not consider our business to be materially dependent upon any single patent, license or other intellectual property right, or any group of related patents, licenses or other intellectual property rights. From time to time, we might engage in litigation to enforce our patents and other intellectual property or defend against claims of alleged infringement. Any of our patents, trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and other proprietary rights could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or may not provide competitive advantages. Numerous trademarks used on or in connection with our products are also considered to be valuable assets. In addition, to protect confidential information, including our trade secrets, we require our employees and contractors to sign confidentiality and invention assignment agreements. We also enter into non-disclosure agreements with our suppliers and appropriate customers to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. Although our ability to compete may be affected by our ability to protect our intellectual property, we believe that, because of the rapid pace of technological change in the wireless telecommunications industry, our innovative skills, technical expertise and ability to introduce new products on a timely basis will be more important in maintaining our competitive position than protection of our intellectual property. Trade secret, trademark, copyright and patent protections are important but must be supported by other factors such as the expanding knowledge, ability and experience of our personnel, new product introductions and product enhancements. Although we continue to implement protective measures and intend to vigorously defend our intellectual property rights, there can be no assurance that these measures will be successful. Environmental and Other Regulations Our facilities and operations, in common with those of our industry in general, are subject to numerous domestic and international laws and regulations designed to protect the environment, particularly with regard to wastes and emissions. We believe that we have complied with these requirements and that such compliance has not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Based upon currently available information, we do not expect expenditures to protect the environment and to comply with current environmental laws and regulations over the next several years to have a material impact on our competitive or financial position, but can give no assurance that such expenditures will not exceed current expectations. From time to time, we receive notices from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or equivalent state or international environmental agencies that we are a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, which is commonly known as the Superfund Act and equivalent laws. Such notices may assert potential liability for cleanup costs at various sites, which include sites owned by us, sites we previously owned and treatment or disposal sites not owned by us, allegedly containing hazardous substances attributable to us from past operations. We are not presently aware of any such liability that could be material to our business, financial condition or operating results, but due to the nature of our business and environmental risks, we cannot provide assurance that any such material liability will not arise in the future. Electronic products are subject to environmental regulation in a number of jurisdictions. Equipment produced by us is subject to domestic and international requirements requiring end-of-life management and/or restricting materials in products delivered to customers. We believe that we have complied with such rules and regulations, where applicable, with respect to our existing products sold into such jurisdictions. Radio communications are also subject to governmental regulation. Equipment produced by us is subject to domestic and international requirements to avoid interference among users of radio frequencies and to permit interconnection of telecommunications equipment. We believe that we have complied with such rules and regulations with respect to our existing products, and we intend to comply with such rules and regulations with respect to our future customer relationships. They may from time to time leverage their extensive overall portfolios into completely outsourced and managed network offerings restricting opportunities for specialist suppliers. In addition, some competitors may offer seller financing, which can be a competitive advantage under certain economic climates. issues causing short-term material shortages are within the normal frequency and impact range experienced by high-tech manufacturing companies. They are due primarily to the highly technical nature of many of our purchased components. Looking ahead, we anticipate standard lead times for our raw materials and supplies. Some of our larger competitors may also act as systems integrators through which we sometimes distribute and sell products and services to end users. Patents and Other Intellectual Property The smaller independent private and public specialist competitors typically leverage new technologies and low products costs, but are generally less capable of offering a complete solution including professional services, especially in the North America and Africa regions which form the majority of our addressed market. We concentrate on market opportunities that we believe are compatible with our resources, overall technological capabilities and objectives. Principal competitive factors are cost-effectiveness, product quality and reliability, technological capabilities, service, ability to meet delivery schedules and the effectiveness of dealers in international areas. We believe that the combination of our network and systems engineering support and service, global reach, technological innovation, agility and close collaborative relationships with our customers are the key competitive strengths for us. However, customers may still make decisions based primarily on factors such as price, financing terms and/or past or existing relationships, where it may be difficult for us to compete effectively or profitably. Research and Development We believe that our ability to enhance our current products, develop and introduce new products on a timely basis, maintain technological competitiveness and meet customer requirements is essential to our success. Accordingly, we allocate, and intend to continue to allocate, a significant portion of our resources to research and development efforts in two major product areas: backhaul solutions and network management systems. In addition, we are investing in key innovation that will help separate these products from the competition. The majority of such research and development resources will be used for point-to-point digital microwave radio systems for access, backhaul, trunking and license- exempt applications. Our research and development expenditures totaled $35.5 million, or 10.3% of revenue, in fiscal 2014, $39.4 million, or 8.4% of revenue, in fiscal 2013, and $36.0 million, or 8.1% of revenue, in fiscal 2012. Research and development are primarily directed to the development of new products and to building technological capability. We are an industry innovator and intend to continue to focus significant resources on product development in an effort to maintain our competitiveness and support our entry into new markets. We maintain development programs intended to result in new products, such as additions to our WTM3000, Eclipse and new CTR product platforms. Our product development teams numbered 195 employees as of June 27, 2014, and were located in Santa Clara, California; Wellington, New Zealand; Singapore; Ljubljana, Slovenia; and Montreal, Canada. Raw Materials and Supplies Because of the range of our products and services, as well as the wide geographic dispersion of our facilities, we use numerous sources for the wide array of raw materials needed for our operations and for our products, such as electronic components, printed circuit boards, metals and plastics. We are dependent upon suppliers and subcontractors for a large number of components and subsystems and upon the ability of our suppliers and subcontractors to adhere to customer or regulatory materials restrictions and meet performance and quality specifications and delivery schedules. Our strategy for procuring raw material and supplies includes dual sourcing on strategic assemblies and components. In general, we believe this reduces our risk with regard to the potential financial difficulties in our supply base. In some instances, we are dependent upon one or a few sources, either because of the specialized nature of a particular item or because of local content preference requirements pursuant to which we operate on a given project. Examples of sole or limited source categories include metal fabrications and castings, for which we own the tooling and therefore limit our supplier relationships, and MMICs (a type of integrated circuit used in manufacturing microwave radios), which we procure at volume discount from a single source. Our supply chain plan includes mitigation plans for alternative manufacturing sources and identified alternate suppliers. Although we have been affected by performance issues of some of our suppliers and subcontractors, we have not been materially adversely affected by the inability to obtain raw materials or products. In general, any performance We consider our patents and other intellectual property rights, in the aggregate, to constitute an important asset. We own a portfolio of patents, trade secrets, know-how, confidential information, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property. We also license intellectual property to and from third parties. As of August 22, 2014, we held 143 U.S. patents and 113 international patents and had 60 U.S. patent applications pending and 113 international patent applications pending. We do not consider our business to be materially dependent upon any single patent, license or other intellectual property right, or any group of related patents, licenses or other intellectual property rights. From time to time, we might engage in litigation to enforce our patents and other intellectual property or defend against claims of alleged infringement. Any of our patents, trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and other proprietary rights could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or may not provide competitive advantages. Numerous trademarks used on or in connection with our products are also considered to be valuable assets. In addition, to protect confidential information, including our trade secrets, we require our employees and contractors to sign confidentiality and invention assignment agreements. We also enter into non-disclosure agreements with our suppliers and appropriate customers to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. Although our ability to compete may be affected by our ability to protect our intellectual property, we believe that, because of the rapid pace of technological change in the wireless telecommunications industry, our innovative skills, technical expertise and ability to introduce new products on a timely basis will be more important in maintaining our competitive position than protection of our intellectual property. Trade secret, trademark, copyright and patent protections are important but must be supported by other factors such as the expanding knowledge, ability and experience of our personnel, new product introductions and product enhancements. Although we continue to implement protective measures and intend to vigorously defend our intellectual property rights, there can be no assurance that these measures will be successful. A n n u a l R e p o r t Environmental and Other Regulations Our facilities and operations, in common with those of our industry in general, are subject to numerous domestic and international laws and regulations designed to protect the environment, particularly with regard to wastes and emissions. We believe that we have complied with these requirements and that such compliance has not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Based upon currently available information, we do not expect expenditures to protect the environment and to comply with current environmental laws and regulations over the next several years to have a material impact on our competitive or financial position, but can give no assurance that such expenditures will not exceed current expectations. From time to time, we receive notices from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or equivalent state or international environmental agencies that we are a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, which is commonly known as the Superfund Act and equivalent laws. Such notices may assert potential liability for cleanup costs at various sites, which include sites owned by us, sites we previously owned and treatment or disposal sites not owned by us, allegedly containing hazardous substances attributable to us from past operations. We are not presently aware of any such liability that could be material to our business, financial condition or operating results, but due to the nature of our business and environmental risks, we cannot provide assurance that any such material liability will not arise in the future. Electronic products are subject to environmental regulation in a number of jurisdictions. Equipment produced by us is subject to domestic and international requirements requiring end-of-life management and/or restricting materials in products delivered to customers. We believe that we have complied with such rules and regulations, where applicable, with respect to our existing products sold into such jurisdictions. Radio communications are also subject to governmental regulation. Equipment produced by us is subject to domestic and international requirements to avoid interference among users of radio frequencies and to permit interconnection of telecommunications equipment. We believe that we have complied with such rules and regulations with respect to our existing products, and we intend to comply with such rules and regulations with respect to our future 11 t r o p e R l a u n n A products. Reallocation of the frequency spectrum also could impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are in the process of developing comprehensive policies and procedures concerning conflict minerals compliance. Employees As of June 27, 2014 we employed approximately 960 people, compared with approximately 1,000 as of the end of fiscal 2013 and approximately 1,000 as of the end of fiscal 2012. Approximately 320 of our employees are located in the U.S. We also utilized approximately 76 independent contractors as of June 27, 2014. None of our employees in the U.S. are represented by a labor union. In certain international subsidiaries, our employees are represented by workers’ councils or statutory labor unions. In general, we believe that our relations with our employees are good. Executive Officers of the Registrant The name, age, position held with us, and principal occupation and employment during at least the past 5 years for each of our executive officers as of December 19, 2014, are as follows: There is no family relationship between any of our executive officers or directors, and there are no arrangements or understandings between any of our executive officers or directors and any other person pursuant to which any of them was appointed or elected as an officer or director, other than arrangements or understandings with our directors. Web site Access to Aviat Networks’ Reports; Available Information We maintain an Internet Web site at http://www.aviatnetworks.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, proxy statements, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) are available free of charge on our Web site as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our website and the information posted thereon are not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any current or other periodic report that we file or furnish to the SEC. We will also provide the reports in electronic or paper form, free of charge upon request. All reports we file with or furnish to the SEC are also available free of charge via EDGAR through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Name and Age Position Currently Held and Past Business Experience Michael A. Pangia, 53 . . . . . . Mr. Pangia has been our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Additional information relating to our business and operations is set forth in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Edward J. (“Ned”) Hayes, 59 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board since July 18, 2011. From March 2009 to July 2011, he served as our Chief Sales Officer responsible for company-wide operations of the global sales and services organization. Prior to joining Aviat Networks, from 2008 to 2009, Mr. Pangia served as Senior Vice President, global sales operations and strategy at Nortel, where he was responsible for all operational aspects of the global sales function. From 2006 to 2008, he was President of Nortel’s Asia region where his key responsibilities included sales and overall business management for all countries where Nortel did business in the region. Mr. Hayes joined Aviat Networks in October 2011 and serves as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and is responsible for the finance and IT organizations. Prior to joining Aviat Networks, from 2006 to October 2011, Mr. Hayes was the Chief Financial Officer at Pillar Data Systems, Inc., an enterprise data storage company, which was acquired by Oracle Corporation. Before joining Pillar Data, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Corporation, a data storage company. Mr. Hayes currently serves as a senior advisor to the CEO of Super Micro Computer, Inc., where he previously served as an independent director and Chair of the Audit Committee. He also currently serves as an independent director and non-executive Chairman of the Board of Alaska Communications Systems, a provider of high-speed wireless, mobile broadband, internet, local, long-distance and advanced broadband solutions for businesses and consumers in Alaska. Meena Elliott, 51 . . . . . . . . . . Ms. Elliott was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary on September 1, 2011 and is responsible for the legal and human resources organizations. From July 2009 to August 2011, she served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and in August 2011, was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. She joined our company as Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary in January 2007 when Harris Corporation's MCD and Stratex Networks merged. Ms. Elliott joined MCD as Division Counsel in March 2006. Prior to joining MCD, she was Chief Counsel at the Department of Commerce from 2002 to 2006. Heinz H. Stumpe, 59 . . . . . . . Mr. Stumpe was appointed Chief Sales Officer on June 25, 2012. Before his appointment as Chief Sales Officer, Mr. Stumpe was our Senior Vice President and Chief Operation Officer since June 30, 2008. Previously, he was Vice President, Global Operations for Aviat Networks and Stratex Networks. He joined Stratex Networks as Director of Marketing in 1996. He was promoted to Vice President, Global Accounts in 1999, Vice President, Strategic Accounts in 2002 and Vice President, Global Operations in April 2006. Shaun McFall, 54 . . . . . . . . . . Mr. McFall has been our Chief Marketing Officer since July 2008. Previously, from 2000 to 2008, he served as Vice President, Marketing for Aviat Networks and Stratex Networks. He has been with us since 1989. 12 products. Reallocation of the frequency spectrum also could impact our business, financial condition and results of We are in the process of developing comprehensive policies and procedures concerning conflict minerals operations. compliance. Employees As of June 27, 2014 we employed approximately 960 people, compared with approximately 1,000 as of the end of fiscal 2013 and approximately 1,000 as of the end of fiscal 2012. Approximately 320 of our employees are located in the U.S. We also utilized approximately 76 independent contractors as of June 27, 2014. None of our employees in the U.S. are represented by a labor union. In certain international subsidiaries, our employees are represented by workers’ councils or statutory labor unions. In general, we believe that our relations with our employees are good. Executive Officers of the Registrant The name, age, position held with us, and principal occupation and employment during at least the past 5 years for each of our executive officers as of December 19, 2014, are as follows: There is no family relationship between any of our executive officers or directors, and there are no arrangements or understandings between any of our executive officers or directors and any other person pursuant to which any of them was appointed or elected as an officer or director, other than arrangements or understandings with our directors. Web site Access to Aviat Networks’ Reports; Available Information We maintain an Internet Web site at http://www.aviatnetworks.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, proxy statements, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) are available free of charge on our Web site as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our website and the information posted thereon are not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any current or other periodic report that we file or furnish to the SEC. We will also provide the reports in electronic or paper form, free of charge upon request. All reports we file with or furnish to the SEC are also available free of charge via EDGAR through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Name and Age Position Currently Held and Past Business Experience Michael A. Pangia, 53 . . . . . . Mr. Pangia has been our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Additional information relating to our business and operations is set forth in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. A n n u a l R e p o r t Edward J. (“Ned”) Hayes, 59 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Hayes joined Aviat Networks in October 2011 and serves as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and is responsible for the finance and IT Board since July 18, 2011. From March 2009 to July 2011, he served as our Chief Sales Officer responsible for company-wide operations of the global sales and services organization. Prior to joining Aviat Networks, from 2008 to 2009, Mr. Pangia served as Senior Vice President, global sales operations and strategy at Nortel, where he was responsible for all operational aspects of the global sales function. From 2006 to 2008, he was President of Nortel’s Asia region where his key responsibilities included sales and overall business management for all countries where Nortel did business in the region. organizations. Prior to joining Aviat Networks, from 2006 to October 2011, Mr. Hayes was the Chief Financial Officer at Pillar Data Systems, Inc., an enterprise data storage company, which was acquired by Oracle Corporation. Before joining Pillar Data, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Corporation, a data storage company. Mr. Hayes currently serves as a senior advisor to the CEO of Super Micro Computer, Inc., where he previously served as an independent director and Chair of the Audit Committee. He also currently serves as an independent director and non-executive Chairman of the Board of Alaska Communications Systems, a provider of high-speed wireless, mobile broadband, internet, local, long-distance and advanced broadband solutions for businesses and consumers in Alaska. September 1, 2011 and is responsible for the legal and human resources organizations. From July 2009 to August 2011, she served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and in August 2011, was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. She joined our company as Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary in January 2007 when Harris Corporation's MCD and Stratex Networks merged. Ms. Elliott joined MCD as Division Counsel in March 2006. Prior to joining MCD, she was Chief Counsel at the Department of Commerce from 2002 to 2006. appointment as Chief Sales Officer, Mr. Stumpe was our Senior Vice President and Chief Operation Officer since June 30, 2008. Previously, he was Vice President, Global Operations for Aviat Networks and Stratex Networks. He joined Stratex Networks as Director of Marketing in 1996. He was promoted to Vice President, Global Accounts in 1999, Vice President, Strategic Accounts in 2002 and Vice President, Global Operations in April 2006. Heinz H. Stumpe, 59 . . . . . . . Mr. Stumpe was appointed Chief Sales Officer on June 25, 2012. Before his Shaun McFall, 54 . . . . . . . . . . Mr. McFall has been our Chief Marketing Officer since July 2008. Previously, from 2000 to 2008, he served as Vice President, Marketing for Aviat Networks and Stratex Networks. He has been with us since 1989. Meena Elliott, 51 . . . . . . . . . . Ms. Elliott was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary on 13 t r o p e R l a u n n A Item 1A. Risk Factors In addition to the risks described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in certain of our other filings with the SEC, the following risks and uncertainties, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by us or by any forward-looking statement contained herein. Prospective and existing investors are strongly urged to carefully consider the various cautionary statements and risks set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other public filings. We have many business risks including those related to our financial performance, investments in our common stock, operating our business and legal matters. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are not aware of or focused on may also impair our business operations. If any of these risks actually occur, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Our success will depend on new products introduced to the marketplace in a timely manner, successfully completing product transitioning and achieving customer acceptance. The market for our products is characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards and frequent new product introductions. Our future success will depend, in part, on continuous, timely development and introduction of new products and enhancements that address evolving market requirements and are attractive to customers. If we fail to develop or introduce on a timely basis new products or product enhancements or features that achieve market acceptance, our business may suffer. Additionally, we work closely with a variety of third party partners to develop new product features and new platforms. Should our partners face delays in the development process, then the timing of the rollout of our new products may be significantly impacted which may negatively impact our revenue and gross margin. Another factor impacting our future success is the growth in the customer demand of our new products. Rapidly changing technology, frequent new products introductions and enhancements, short product life cycles and changes in customer requirements characterize the markets for our products. We believe that successful new product introductions provide a significant competitive advantage because of the significant resources committed by customers in adopting new products and their reluctance to change products after these resources have been expended. We have spent, and expect to continue to spend, significant resources on internal research and development to support our effort to develop and introduce new products and enhancements. As we transition to new product platforms, we face significant risk that the development of our new products may not be accepted by our current customers or by new customers. To the extent that we fail to introduce new and innovative products that are adopted by customers, we could fail to obtain an adequate return on these investments and could lose market share to our competitors, which could be difficult or impossible to regain. Similarly we may face decreased revenue, gross margins and profitability due to a rapid decline in sales of current products as customers hold spending to focus purchases on new product platforms. We could incur significant costs in completing the transition, including costs of inventory write-downs of the current product as customers transition to new product platforms. In addition, products or technologies developed by others may render our products noncompetitive or obsolete and result in significant reduction in orders from our customers and the loss of existing and prospective customers. Our average sales prices may decline in the future. We are experiencing, and are likely to continue to experience, declining sales prices. This price pressure is likely to result in downward pricing pressure on our products and services. As a result, we are likely to experience declining average sales prices for our products. Our future profitability will depend upon our ability to improve manufacturing efficiencies, reduce costs of materials used in our products and to continue to introduce new lower-cost products and product enhancements. If we are unable to respond to increased price competition, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be harmed. Because customers frequently negotiate supply arrangements far in advance of delivery dates, we may be required to commit to price reductions for our products before we are aware of how, or if, cost reductions can be obtained. As a result, current or future price reduction commitments and any inability on our part to respond to increased price competition could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our sales cycle may be lengthy, and the timing of sales, along with additional services such as warehousing, inventory management, installation and implementation of our products within our customers' networks, may extend over more than one period, which can make our operating results difficult to predict. We anticipate difficulty in accurately predicting the timing of the sale of products and amounts of revenue generated from sales of our products, primarily in developing countries. The establishment of a business relationship with a potential customer is a lengthy process, generally taking several months and sometimes longer. Following the establishment of the 14 relationship, the negotiation of purchase terms can be time-consuming, and a potential customer may require an extended evaluation and testing period. We expect that our product sales cycle, which results in our products being designed into our customers' networks, could take 12 to 24 months. A number of factors can contribute to the length of the sales cycle, including technical evaluations of our products, the design process required to integrate our products into our customers' networks and warehousing and/or inventory management services that may be requested by certain large customers. In anticipation of product orders, we may incur substantial costs before the sales cycle is complete and before we receive any customer payments. Specifically, should a customer require warehousing and/or inventory management services, such services may impact our operating results in any period due to the costs associated with providing such services and the fact that the timing of the revenue recognition may be delayed. As a result, in the event that a sale is not completed or is canceled or delayed, we may have incurred substantial expenses, making it more difficult for us to become profitable or otherwise negatively impacting our financial results. Furthermore, because of our lengthy sales cycle, our recognition of revenue from our selling efforts may be substantially delayed, our ability to forecast our future revenue may be more limited and our revenue may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Once a purchase agreement has been executed, the timing and amount of revenue, if applicable, may remain difficult to predict. The completion of services such as warehousing and inventory management, installation and testing of the customer’s networks and the completion of all other suppliers network elements are subject to the customer’s timing and efforts, and other factors outside our control which may prevent us from making predictions of revenue with any certainty and could cause us to experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in our operating results. We have not been profitable and must increase our revenues and reduce costs if we hope to achieve profitability. As measured under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), we incurred net losses of $51.2 million in fiscal 2014, $15.0 million in fiscal 2013 and $24.1 million in fiscal 2012 and have been unprofitable since we became a public company in January 2007. We also have incurred losses from operations in all fiscal years since we became a public company, although we previously generated cash from operations in fiscal 2013, 2012, 2010 and 2009. Throughout fiscal 2014 we experienced strong price competition for new business in all regions while major customer consolidations also put pressure on revenue and gross margin. We saw pricing pressures in all markets, with increased pressure in international markets where we compete for the business of large carrier customers. In all markets, telecommunication operating companies consolidated through mergers or acquisitions, leading to fewer, but larger customers. This consolidation may have a negative impact on our revenue if Aviat is not selected as a vendor. In order to counter pricing pressures, we invested heavily in product improvements to reduce unit costs and enhance product features, exited manufacturing facilities and shifted production to fewer contract manufacturers, and worked with our vendors to attain more favorable pricing. If we are unable to reduce product unit costs associated with enhanced product features, including payments to contract manufacturers and other suppliers, we may not achieve profitability. We cannot be certain that these actions or others that we may take in the future will result in operating profitability or net income as determined under U.S. GAAP. We may not be able to obtain capital when desired on favorable terms, if at all, or without dilution to our stockholders. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, the available line of credit under our credit facility and future cash collections from customers will be sufficient to provide for our anticipated requirements for working capital and capital expenditures for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future. However, it is possible that we may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or otherwise have the capital resources to meet our future capital needs. If this occurs, we may need to sell assets, reduce capital expenditures, or obtain additional financing. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders could be significantly diluted, and these newly-issued securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. We cannot assure you that additional financing will be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms if and when needed, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. We may undertake further restructuring activities, which may adversely impact our operations, and we may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of these activities or any potential future restructurings. Any restructuring activities may harm our business. We continue to evaluate our business to determine the potential need to realign our resources as we continue to transform our business in order to achieve desired cost savings in an increasingly competitive market. In prior years and Item 1A. Risk Factors In addition to the risks described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in certain of our other filings with the SEC, the following risks and uncertainties, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by us or by any forward-looking statement contained herein. Prospective and existing investors are strongly urged to carefully consider the various cautionary statements and risks set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other public filings. We have many business risks including those related to our financial performance, investments in our common stock, operating our business and legal matters. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are not aware of or focused on may also impair our business operations. If any of these risks actually occur, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Our success will depend on new products introduced to the marketplace in a timely manner, successfully completing product transitioning and achieving customer acceptance. The market for our products is characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards and frequent new product introductions. Our future success will depend, in part, on continuous, timely development and introduction of new products and enhancements that address evolving market requirements and are attractive to customers. If we fail to develop or introduce on a timely basis new products or product enhancements or features that achieve market acceptance, our business may suffer. Additionally, we work closely with a variety of third party partners to develop new product features and new platforms. Should our partners face delays in the development process, then the timing of the rollout of our new products may be significantly impacted which may negatively impact our revenue and gross margin. Another factor impacting our future success is the growth in the customer demand of our new products. Rapidly changing technology, frequent new products introductions and enhancements, short product life cycles and changes in customer requirements characterize the markets for our products. We believe that successful new product introductions provide a significant competitive advantage because of the significant resources committed by customers in adopting new products and their reluctance to change products after these resources have been expended. We have spent, and expect to continue to spend, significant resources on internal research and development to support our effort to develop and introduce new products and enhancements. As we transition to new product platforms, we face significant risk that the development of our new products may not be accepted by our current customers or by new customers. To the extent that we fail to introduce new and innovative products that are adopted by customers, we could fail to obtain an adequate return on these investments and could lose market share to our competitors, which could be difficult or impossible to regain. Similarly we may face decreased revenue, gross margins and profitability due to a rapid decline in sales of current products as customers hold spending to focus purchases on new product platforms. We could incur significant costs in completing the transition, including costs of inventory write-downs of the current product as customers transition to new product platforms. In addition, products or technologies developed by others may render our products noncompetitive or obsolete and result in significant reduction in orders from our customers and the loss of existing and prospective customers. Our average sales prices may decline in the future. We are experiencing, and are likely to continue to experience, declining sales prices. This price pressure is likely to result in downward pricing pressure on our products and services. As a result, we are likely to experience declining average sales prices for our products. Our future profitability will depend upon our ability to improve manufacturing efficiencies, reduce costs of materials used in our products and to continue to introduce new lower-cost products and product enhancements. If we are unable to respond to increased price competition, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be harmed. Because customers frequently negotiate supply arrangements far in advance of delivery dates, we may be required to commit to price reductions for our products before we are aware of how, or if, cost reductions can be obtained. As a result, current or future price reduction commitments and any inability on our part to respond to increased price competition could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our sales cycle may be lengthy, and the timing of sales, along with additional services such as warehousing, inventory management, installation and implementation of our products within our customers' networks, may extend over more than one period, which can make our operating results difficult to predict. We anticipate difficulty in accurately predicting the timing of the sale of products and amounts of revenue generated from sales of our products, primarily in developing countries. The establishment of a business relationship with a potential customer is a lengthy process, generally taking several months and sometimes longer. Following the establishment of the relationship, the negotiation of purchase terms can be time-consuming, and a potential customer may require an extended evaluation and testing period. We expect that our product sales cycle, which results in our products being designed into our customers' networks, could take 12 to 24 months. A number of factors can contribute to the length of the sales cycle, including technical evaluations of our products, the design process required to integrate our products into our customers' networks and warehousing and/or inventory management services that may be requested by certain large customers. In anticipation of product orders, we may incur substantial costs before the sales cycle is complete and before we receive any customer payments. Specifically, should a customer require warehousing and/or inventory management services, such services may impact our operating results in any period due to the costs associated with providing such services and the fact that the timing of the revenue recognition may be delayed. As a result, in the event that a sale is not completed or is canceled or delayed, we may have incurred substantial expenses, making it more difficult for us to become profitable or otherwise negatively impacting our financial results. Furthermore, because of our lengthy sales cycle, our recognition of revenue from our selling efforts may be substantially delayed, our ability to forecast our future revenue may be more limited and our revenue may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Once a purchase agreement has been executed, the timing and amount of revenue, if applicable, may remain difficult to predict. The completion of services such as warehousing and inventory management, installation and testing of the customer’s networks and the completion of all other suppliers network elements are subject to the customer’s timing and efforts, and other factors outside our control which may prevent us from making predictions of revenue with any certainty and could cause us to experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in our operating results. We have not been profitable and must increase our revenues and reduce costs if we hope to achieve profitability. As measured under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), we incurred net losses of $51.2 million in fiscal 2014, $15.0 million in fiscal 2013 and $24.1 million in fiscal 2012 and have been unprofitable since we became a public company in January 2007. We also have incurred losses from operations in all fiscal years since we became a public company, although we previously generated cash from operations in fiscal 2013, 2012, 2010 and 2009. A n n u a l R e p o r t Throughout fiscal 2014 we experienced strong price competition for new business in all regions while major customer consolidations also put pressure on revenue and gross margin. We saw pricing pressures in all markets, with increased pressure in international markets where we compete for the business of large carrier customers. In all markets, telecommunication operating companies consolidated through mergers or acquisitions, leading to fewer, but larger customers. This consolidation may have a negative impact on our revenue if Aviat is not selected as a vendor. In order to counter pricing pressures, we invested heavily in product improvements to reduce unit costs and enhance product features, exited manufacturing facilities and shifted production to fewer contract manufacturers, and worked with our vendors to attain more favorable pricing. If we are unable to reduce product unit costs associated with enhanced product features, including payments to contract manufacturers and other suppliers, we may not achieve profitability. We cannot be certain that these actions or others that we may take in the future will result in operating profitability or net income as determined under U.S. GAAP. We may not be able to obtain capital when desired on favorable terms, if at all, or without dilution to our stockholders. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, the available line of credit under our credit facility and future cash collections from customers will be sufficient to provide for our anticipated requirements for working capital and capital expenditures for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future. However, it is possible that we may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or otherwise have the capital resources to meet our future capital needs. If this occurs, we may need to sell assets, reduce capital expenditures, or obtain additional financing. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders could be significantly diluted, and these newly-issued securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. We cannot assure you that additional financing will be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms if and when needed, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. We may undertake further restructuring activities, which may adversely impact our operations, and we may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of these activities or any potential future restructurings. Any restructuring activities may harm our business. We continue to evaluate our business to determine the potential need to realign our resources as we continue to transform our business in order to achieve desired cost savings in an increasingly competitive market. In prior years and 15 again in fiscal 2014, we have undertaken a series of steps to restructure our operations involving, among other things and depending on the year, reductions of our workforce, the relocation of our corporate headquarters and the reduction and outsourcing of manufacturing activities. We incurred restructuring charges of $11.1 million, $3.1 million and $2.3 million in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We have based our restructuring efforts on assumptions and plans regarding the appropriate cost structure of our business based on our product mix and projected sales among other factors. Some of our assumptions include that the relocation of personnel and the outsourcing of certain functions would reduce our operating expenses and the transition risk is low. These assumptions may not be correct and we may not be able to operate in accordance with our plans. Should this occur we may determine that we must incur additional restructuring charges in the future. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will realize all of the anticipated benefits of our restructuring actions or that we will not further reduce or otherwise adjust our workforce or exit, or dispose of, certain businesses and product lines. Any decision to further limit investment, exit, or dispose of businesses or product lines may result in the recording of additional restructuring charges. As a result, the costs actually incurred in connection with the restructuring efforts may be higher than originally planned and may not lead to the anticipated cost savings and/or improved results. For example, if we consolidate additional facilities in the future, we may incur additional restructuring and related expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. t r o p e R l a u n n A Our restructuring actions could harm our relationships with our employees and impact our ability to recruit new employees. Employees, whether or not directly affected by any restructuring actions that we undertake, may seek employment with our business partners, customers or competitors. We cannot assure you that the confidential nature of our proprietary information will not be compromised by any such employees who terminate their employment with us. Further, we believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled personnel. We may have difficulty attracting and retaining such personnel as a result of a perceived risk of future workforce reductions, and we may terminate the employment of employees as part of a restructuring and later determine that such employees were important to the success of the ongoing business. Our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to attract and retain key personnel. Our success and ability to invest and grow depend largely on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, systems integrators through whom we market and sell our products, which means our business success may depend on professional, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Historically, competition for these key personnel has been intense. The loss of services of any of our key personnel (including key personnel joining our company through acquisitions), the inability to retain and attract qualified personnel in the future, delays in hiring required personnel, particularly engineering and sales personnel, or the loss of key personnel to competitors could make it difficult to meet key objectives, such as timely and effective product introductions and financial goals. Due to the volume of our international sales, we may be susceptible to a number of political, economic and geographic risks that could harm our business. We are highly dependent on sales to customers outside the U.S. In fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, our sales to international customers accounted for 60%, 62% and 64%, respectively, of total revenue. Significant portions of our international sales are in less developed countries. Our international sales are likely to continue to account for a large percentage of our products and services revenue for the foreseeable future. As a result, the occurrence of any international, political, economic or geographic event could result in a significant decline in revenue. In addition, compliance with complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations increases our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions. These numerous and sometimes conflicting laws and regulations include internal control and disclosure rules, data privacy and filtering requirements, anti-corruption laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials, and anti-competition regulations, among others. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business and on our ability to offer our products and services in one or more countries, and could also materially affect our brand, our international expansion efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees, our business, and our operating results. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate our policies. Some of the risks and challenges of doing business internationally include: • unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; 16 fluctuations in international currency exchange rates including its impact on unhedgeable currencies and our forecast variations for hedgeable currencies; imposition of tariffs and other barriers and restrictions; • management and operation of an enterprise spread over various countries; the burden of complying with a variety of laws and regulations in various countries; application of the income tax laws and regulations of multiple jurisdictions, including relatively low-rate and relatively high-rate jurisdictions, to our sales and other transactions, which results in additional complexity • general economic and geopolitical conditions, including inflation and trade relationships; • • • • • • • • and uncertainty; • war and acts of terrorism; kidnapping and high crime rate; natural disasters; currency exchange controls; and changes in export regulations. While these factors and the impacts of these factors are difficult to predict, any one or more of them could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations in the future. We face strong competition for maintaining and improving our position in the market, which can adversely affect our revenue growth and operating results. The wireless access, interconnection and backhaul business is a specialized segment of the wireless telecommunications industry and is extremely competitive. We expect competition in this segment to increase. Some of our competitors have more extensive engineering, manufacturing and marketing capabilities and significantly greater financial, technical and personnel resources than we have. In addition, some of our competitors have greater name recognition, broader product lines, a larger installed base of products and longer-standing customer relationships. Our competitors include established companies, such as Ericsson, Huawei, NEC and Alcatel-Lucent, as well as a number of other public and private companies such as Ceragon, DragonWave and SIAE. Some of our competitors are OEMs or these competitors to some extent. One or more of our largest customers could internally develop the capability to manufacture products similar to those manufactured or outsourced by us and, as a result, the demand for our products and services may decrease. In addition, we compete for acquisition and expansion opportunities with many entities that have substantially greater resources than we have. Our competitors may enter into business combinations in order to accelerate product development or to compete more aggressively and we may lack the resources to meet such enhanced competition. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on a number of factors, including price, quality, availability, customer service and support, breadth of product lines, product performance and features, rapid time-to-market delivery capabilities, reliability, timing of new product introductions by us, our customers and competitors, the ability of our customers to obtain financing and the stability of regional sociopolitical and geopolitical circumstances, and the ability of large competitors to obtain business by providing more seller financing especially for large transactions. We can give no assurances that we will have the financial resources, technical expertise, or marketing, sales, distribution, customer service and support capabilities to compete successfully, or that regional sociopolitical and geographic circumstances will be favorable for our successful operation. The effects of the prolonged global financial and economic downturn has had, and may continue to have, significant effects on our customers and suppliers, and has in the past, and may in the future have, a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and stock price. The effects of the global financial and economic downturn include, among other things, significant reductions in available capital and liquidity from banks and other providers of credit, substantial reductions and/or fluctuations in equity and currency values worldwide, and concerns that the worldwide economy has entered into or may enter into a further prolonged recessionary period. This financial downturn has adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our customers’ access to capital and/or willingness to spend capital on our products, and/or their levels of cash liquidity and/or their ability and/or willingness to pay for products that they will order or have already ordered from us, or result in their ceasing operations. again in fiscal 2014, we have undertaken a series of steps to restructure our operations involving, among other things and depending on the year, reductions of our workforce, the relocation of our corporate headquarters and the reduction and outsourcing of manufacturing activities. We incurred restructuring charges of $11.1 million, $3.1 million and $2.3 million in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We have based our restructuring efforts on assumptions and plans regarding the appropriate cost structure of our business based on our product mix and projected sales among other factors. Some of our assumptions include that the relocation of personnel and the outsourcing of certain functions would reduce our operating expenses and the transition risk is low. These assumptions may not be correct and we may not be able to operate in accordance with our plans. Should this occur we may determine that we must incur additional restructuring charges in the future. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will realize all of the anticipated benefits of our restructuring actions or that we will not further reduce or otherwise adjust our workforce or exit, or dispose of, certain businesses and product lines. Any decision to further limit investment, exit, or dispose of businesses or product lines may result in the recording of additional restructuring charges. As a result, the costs actually incurred in connection with the restructuring efforts may be higher than originally planned and may not lead to the anticipated cost savings and/or improved results. For example, if we consolidate additional facilities in the future, we may incur additional restructuring and related expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our restructuring actions could harm our relationships with our employees and impact our ability to recruit new employees. Employees, whether or not directly affected by any restructuring actions that we undertake, may seek employment with our business partners, customers or competitors. We cannot assure you that the confidential nature of our proprietary information will not be compromised by any such employees who terminate their employment with us. Further, we believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled personnel. We may have difficulty attracting and retaining such personnel as a result of a perceived risk of future workforce reductions, and we may terminate the employment of employees as part of a restructuring and later determine that such employees were important to the success of the ongoing business. Our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to attract and retain key personnel. Our success and ability to invest and grow depend largely on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, professional, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Historically, competition for these key personnel has been intense. The loss of services of any of our key personnel (including key personnel joining our company through acquisitions), the inability to retain and attract qualified personnel in the future, delays in hiring required personnel, particularly engineering and sales personnel, or the loss of key personnel to competitors could make it difficult to meet key objectives, such as timely and effective product introductions and financial goals. Due to the volume of our international sales, we may be susceptible to a number of political, economic and geographic risks that could harm our business. We are highly dependent on sales to customers outside the U.S. In fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, our sales to international customers accounted for 60%, 62% and 64%, respectively, of total revenue. Significant portions of our international sales are in less developed countries. Our international sales are likely to continue to account for a large percentage of our products and services revenue for the foreseeable future. As a result, the occurrence of any international, political, economic or geographic event could result in a significant decline in revenue. In addition, compliance with complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations increases our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions. These numerous and sometimes conflicting laws and regulations include internal control and disclosure rules, data privacy and filtering requirements, anti-corruption laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials, and anti-competition regulations, among others. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business and on our ability to offer our products and services in one or more countries, and could also materially affect our brand, our international expansion efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees, our business, and our operating results. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate our policies. Some of the risks and challenges of doing business internationally include: • unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; • • fluctuations in international currency exchange rates including its impact on unhedgeable currencies and our forecast variations for hedgeable currencies; imposition of tariffs and other barriers and restrictions; • management and operation of an enterprise spread over various countries; • • the burden of complying with a variety of laws and regulations in various countries; application of the income tax laws and regulations of multiple jurisdictions, including relatively low-rate and relatively high-rate jurisdictions, to our sales and other transactions, which results in additional complexity and uncertainty; • general economic and geopolitical conditions, including inflation and trade relationships; • war and acts of terrorism; • • • • kidnapping and high crime rate; natural disasters; currency exchange controls; and changes in export regulations. While these factors and the impacts of these factors are difficult to predict, any one or more of them could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations in the future. We face strong competition for maintaining and improving our position in the market, which can adversely affect our revenue growth and operating results. The wireless access, interconnection and backhaul business is a specialized segment of the wireless telecommunications industry and is extremely competitive. We expect competition in this segment to increase. Some of our competitors have more extensive engineering, manufacturing and marketing capabilities and significantly greater financial, technical and personnel resources than we have. In addition, some of our competitors have greater name recognition, broader product lines, a larger installed base of products and longer-standing customer relationships. Our competitors include established companies, such as Ericsson, Huawei, NEC and Alcatel-Lucent, as well as a number of other public and private companies such as Ceragon, DragonWave and SIAE. Some of our competitors are OEMs or systems integrators through whom we market and sell our products, which means our business success may depend on these competitors to some extent. One or more of our largest customers could internally develop the capability to manufacture products similar to those manufactured or outsourced by us and, as a result, the demand for our products and services may decrease. A n n u a l R e p o r t In addition, we compete for acquisition and expansion opportunities with many entities that have substantially greater resources than we have. Our competitors may enter into business combinations in order to accelerate product development or to compete more aggressively and we may lack the resources to meet such enhanced competition. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on a number of factors, including price, quality, availability, customer service and support, breadth of product lines, product performance and features, rapid time-to-market delivery capabilities, reliability, timing of new product introductions by us, our customers and competitors, the ability of our customers to obtain financing and the stability of regional sociopolitical and geopolitical circumstances, and the ability of large competitors to obtain business by providing more seller financing especially for large transactions. We can give no assurances that we will have the financial resources, technical expertise, or marketing, sales, distribution, customer service and support capabilities to compete successfully, or that regional sociopolitical and geographic circumstances will be favorable for our successful operation. The effects of the prolonged global financial and economic downturn has had, and may continue to have, significant effects on our customers and suppliers, and has in the past, and may in the future have, a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and stock price. The effects of the global financial and economic downturn include, among other things, significant reductions in available capital and liquidity from banks and other providers of credit, substantial reductions and/or fluctuations in equity and currency values worldwide, and concerns that the worldwide economy has entered into or may enter into a further prolonged recessionary period. This financial downturn has adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our customers’ access to capital and/or willingness to spend capital on our products, and/or their levels of cash liquidity and/or their ability and/or willingness to pay for products that they will order or have already ordered from us, or result in their ceasing operations. 17 t r o p e R l a u n n A Further, we have experienced an increasing number of our customers, principally in emerging markets, requesting longer payment terms, lease or vendor financing arrangements, longer terms for the letters of credit securing purchases of our products and services, which could potentially negatively impact our orders, revenue conversion cycle, and cash flows. In seeking to reduce their expenses, we have also seen significant pressure from our customers to lower prices for our products as they try to improve their operating performance and procure additional capital equipment within their reduced budget levels. To the extent that we lower prices on our products and services, our orders, revenues, and gross margins may be negatively impacted. Additionally, certain emerging markets are particularly sensitive to pricing as a key differentiator. Where price is a primary decision driver, we may not be able to effectively compete or we may choose not to compete due to unacceptable margins. In addition, a financial downturn could materially adversely affect our suppliers’ access to capital and liquidity with control, including: which to maintain their inventories, production levels, and/or product quality, could cause them to raise prices or lower production levels, or result in their ceasing operations. Further, with respect to our credit facility discussed under “Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Strategies” in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, if the global financial crisis adversely affects Silicon Valley Bank, our ability to access the funds available under our credit facility could be materially adversely affected. The potential effects of these economic factors are difficult to forecast and mitigate. As a consequence, our operating results for a particular period are difficult to predict, and, therefore, prior results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods. Any of the foregoing effects could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition and could adversely affect our stock price. If we fail to accurately forecast our manufacturing requirements or customer demand, we could incur additional the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; costs, which would adversely affect our business and results of operations. If we fail to accurately predict our manufacturing requirements or forecast customer demand, we may incur additional costs of manufacturing and our gross margins and financial results could be adversely affected. If we overestimate our requirements, our contract manufacturers may experience an oversupply of components and assess us charges for excess or obsolete components that could adversely affect our gross margins. If we underestimate our requirements, our contract manufacturers may have inadequate inventory or components, which could interrupt manufacturing and result in higher manufacturing costs, shipment delays, damage to customer relationships and/or our payment of penalties to our customers. Our contract manufacturers also have other customers and may not have sufficient capacity to meet all of their customer's needs, including ours, during periods of excess demand. Part of our inventory may be written off, which would increase our cost of revenues. In addition, we may be exposed to inventory-related losses on inventories purchased by our contract manufacturers. During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recorded charges to reduce the carrying value of our inventory to the lower of cost or market totaling $7.2 million, $9.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively. Such charges equaled 2.1%, 2.1% and 1.1% of our revenue in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These charges were primarily due to excess and obsolete inventory, including deferred cost of sales, resulting from product transitioning and discontinuance. Inventory of raw materials, work in-process or finished products may accumulate in the future, and we may encounter losses due to a variety of factors, including: • • rapid technological change in the wireless telecommunications industry resulting in frequent product changes; the need of our contract manufacturers to order raw materials that have long lead times and our inability to estimate exact amounts and types of items thus needed, especially with regard to the frequencies in which the final products ordered will operate; and • cost reduction initiatives resulting in component changes within the products. We depend on sole or limited sources for some key components and failure to receive timely delivery of any of Further, our inventory of finished products may accumulate as the result of cancellation of customer orders or our customers’ refusal to confirm the acceptance of our products. Our contract manufacturers are required to purchase inventory based on manufacturing projections we provide to them. If actual orders from our customers are lower than these manufacturing projections, our contract manufacturers will have excess inventory of raw materials or finished products which we would be required to purchase. In addition, we require our contract manufacturers from time to time to purchase more inventory than is immediately required, and to partially assemble components, in order to shorten our delivery time in case of an increase in demand for our products. In the absence of such increase in demand, we may need to compensate our contract manufacturers. If we are required to purchase excess inventory from our contract 18 manufacturers or otherwise compensate our contract manufacturers for purchasing excess inventory, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. We also may purchase components or raw materials from time to time for use by our contract manufacturers in the manufacturing of our products. These purchases are based on our own manufacturing projections. If our actual orders are lower than these manufacturing projections, we may accumulate excess inventory, which we may be required to write-off. If we are forced to write-off this inventory other than in the normal course of business, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Our effective tax rate could be highly volatile and could adversely affect our operating results. Our future effective tax rate may be adversely affected by a number of factors, many of which are outside of our • • • • • • • • • • the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed; adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns; increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of acquired in-process research and development and impairment of goodwill in connection with acquisitions; changes in available tax credits; changes in share-based compensation expense; changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; changes in domestic or international tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws; the tax effects of purchase accounting for acquisitions and restructuring charges that may cause fluctuations between reporting periods; and taxes that may be incurred upon a repatriation of cash from foreign operations. Any significant increase in our future effective tax rates could impact our results of operations for future periods adversely. If we fail to effectively manage our contract manufacturer relationships, we could incur additional costs or be unable to timely fulfill our customer commitments, which would adversely affect our business and results of operations and, in the event of an inability to fulfill commitments, would harm our customer relationships. We outsource all of our manufacturing and a substantial portion of our repair service operations to independent contract manufacturers and other third parties. Our contract manufacturers typically manufacture our products based on rolling forecasts of our product needs that we provide to them on a regular basis. The contract manufacturers are responsible for procuring components necessary to build our products based on our rolling forecasts, building and assembling the products, testing the products in accordance with our specifications and then shipping the products to us. We configure the products to our customer requirements, conduct final testing and then ship the products to our customers. Although we currently partner with multiple major contract manufacturers, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter problems as we are dependent on contract manufacturers to provide these manufacturing services or that we will be able to replace a contract manufacturer that is not able to meet our demand. In addition, if we fail to effectively manage our relationships with our contract manufacturers or other service providers, or if one or more of them should not fully comply with their contractual obligations or should experience delays, disruptions, component procurement problems or quality control problems, then our ability to ship products to our customers or otherwise fulfill our contractual obligations to our customers could be delayed or impaired which would adversely affect our business, financial results and customer relationships. these components could result in deferred or lost sales. In some instances, we are dependent upon one or a few sources, either because of the specialized nature of a particular item or because of local content preference requirements pursuant to which we operate on a given project. Examples of sole or limited sourcing categories include metal fabrications and castings, for which we own the tooling and therefore limit our supplier relationships, and MMICs (a type of integrated circuit used in manufacturing microwave radios), which we procure at a volume discount from a single source. Our supply chain plan includes mitigation plans for alternative manufacturing sources and identified alternate suppliers. However, if these alternatives cannot address our requirements when our existing sources of these components fail to deliver them on time, we could suffer delayed Further, we have experienced an increasing number of our customers, principally in emerging markets, requesting longer payment terms, lease or vendor financing arrangements, longer terms for the letters of credit securing purchases of our products and services, which could potentially negatively impact our orders, revenue conversion cycle, and cash flows. In seeking to reduce their expenses, we have also seen significant pressure from our customers to lower prices for our products as they try to improve their operating performance and procure additional capital equipment within their reduced budget levels. To the extent that we lower prices on our products and services, our orders, revenues, and gross margins may be negatively impacted. Additionally, certain emerging markets are particularly sensitive to pricing as a key differentiator. Where price is a primary decision driver, we may not be able to effectively compete or we may choose not to compete due to unacceptable margins. which to maintain their inventories, production levels, and/or product quality, could cause them to raise prices or lower production levels, or result in their ceasing operations. Further, with respect to our credit facility discussed under “Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Strategies” in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, if the global financial crisis adversely affects Silicon Valley Bank, our ability to access the funds available under our credit facility could be materially adversely affected. The potential effects of these economic factors are difficult to forecast and mitigate. As a consequence, our operating results for a particular period are difficult to predict, and, therefore, prior results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods. Any of the foregoing effects could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition and could adversely affect our stock price. If we fail to accurately forecast our manufacturing requirements or customer demand, we could incur additional costs, which would adversely affect our business and results of operations. If we fail to accurately predict our manufacturing requirements or forecast customer demand, we may incur additional costs of manufacturing and our gross margins and financial results could be adversely affected. If we overestimate our requirements, our contract manufacturers may experience an oversupply of components and assess us charges for excess or obsolete components that could adversely affect our gross margins. If we underestimate our requirements, our contract manufacturers may have inadequate inventory or components, which could interrupt manufacturing and result in higher manufacturing costs, shipment delays, damage to customer relationships and/or our payment of penalties to our customers. Our contract manufacturers also have other customers and may not have sufficient capacity to meet all of their customer's needs, including ours, during periods of excess demand. Part of our inventory may be written off, which would increase our cost of revenues. In addition, we may be exposed to inventory-related losses on inventories purchased by our contract manufacturers. During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recorded charges to reduce the carrying value of our inventory to the lower of cost or market totaling $7.2 million, $9.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively. Such charges equaled 2.1%, 2.1% and 1.1% of our revenue in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These charges were primarily due to excess and obsolete inventory, including deferred cost of sales, resulting from product transitioning and discontinuance. Inventory of raw materials, work in-process or finished products may accumulate in the future, and we may encounter losses due to a variety of factors, including: rapid technological change in the wireless telecommunications industry resulting in frequent product the need of our contract manufacturers to order raw materials that have long lead times and our inability to estimate exact amounts and types of items thus needed, especially with regard to the frequencies in which the final products ordered will operate; and • • changes; Further, our inventory of finished products may accumulate as the result of cancellation of customer orders or our customers’ refusal to confirm the acceptance of our products. Our contract manufacturers are required to purchase inventory based on manufacturing projections we provide to them. If actual orders from our customers are lower than these manufacturing projections, our contract manufacturers will have excess inventory of raw materials or finished products which we would be required to purchase. In addition, we require our contract manufacturers from time to time to purchase more inventory than is immediately required, and to partially assemble components, in order to shorten our delivery time in case of an increase in demand for our products. In the absence of such increase in demand, we may need to compensate our contract manufacturers. If we are required to purchase excess inventory from our contract In addition, a financial downturn could materially adversely affect our suppliers’ access to capital and liquidity with control, including: manufacturers or otherwise compensate our contract manufacturers for purchasing excess inventory, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. We also may purchase components or raw materials from time to time for use by our contract manufacturers in the manufacturing of our products. These purchases are based on our own manufacturing projections. If our actual orders are lower than these manufacturing projections, we may accumulate excess inventory, which we may be required to write-off. If we are forced to write-off this inventory other than in the normal course of business, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Our effective tax rate could be highly volatile and could adversely affect our operating results. Our future effective tax rate may be adversely affected by a number of factors, many of which are outside of our • • • • • • • • • • the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed; adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns; increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of acquired in-process research and development and impairment of goodwill in connection with acquisitions; changes in available tax credits; changes in share-based compensation expense; changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; changes in domestic or international tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; the tax effects of purchase accounting for acquisitions and restructuring charges that may cause fluctuations between reporting periods; and taxes that may be incurred upon a repatriation of cash from foreign operations. A n n u a l R e p o r t Any significant increase in our future effective tax rates could impact our results of operations for future periods adversely. If we fail to effectively manage our contract manufacturer relationships, we could incur additional costs or be unable to timely fulfill our customer commitments, which would adversely affect our business and results of operations and, in the event of an inability to fulfill commitments, would harm our customer relationships. We outsource all of our manufacturing and a substantial portion of our repair service operations to independent contract manufacturers and other third parties. Our contract manufacturers typically manufacture our products based on rolling forecasts of our product needs that we provide to them on a regular basis. The contract manufacturers are responsible for procuring components necessary to build our products based on our rolling forecasts, building and assembling the products, testing the products in accordance with our specifications and then shipping the products to us. We configure the products to our customer requirements, conduct final testing and then ship the products to our customers. Although we currently partner with multiple major contract manufacturers, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter problems as we are dependent on contract manufacturers to provide these manufacturing services or that we will be able to replace a contract manufacturer that is not able to meet our demand. In addition, if we fail to effectively manage our relationships with our contract manufacturers or other service providers, or if one or more of them should not fully comply with their contractual obligations or should experience delays, disruptions, component procurement problems or quality control problems, then our ability to ship products to our customers or otherwise fulfill our contractual obligations to our customers could be delayed or impaired which would adversely affect our business, financial results and customer relationships. • cost reduction initiatives resulting in component changes within the products. We depend on sole or limited sources for some key components and failure to receive timely delivery of any of these components could result in deferred or lost sales. In some instances, we are dependent upon one or a few sources, either because of the specialized nature of a particular item or because of local content preference requirements pursuant to which we operate on a given project. Examples of sole or limited sourcing categories include metal fabrications and castings, for which we own the tooling and therefore limit our supplier relationships, and MMICs (a type of integrated circuit used in manufacturing microwave radios), which we procure at a volume discount from a single source. Our supply chain plan includes mitigation plans for alternative manufacturing sources and identified alternate suppliers. However, if these alternatives cannot address our requirements when our existing sources of these components fail to deliver them on time, we could suffer delayed 19 shipments, canceled orders and lost or deferred revenues, as well as material damage to our customer relationships. Should this occur, our operating results, cash flows and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Credit and commercial risks and exposures could increase if the financial condition of our customers declines. this trend to continue. Some operators in this industry have experienced financial difficulty and have filed, or may file, for t r o p e R l a u n n A A substantial portion of our sales are to customers in the telecommunications industry. These customers may require their suppliers to provide extended payment terms, direct loans or other forms of financial support as a condition to obtaining commercial contracts. We expect that we may provide or commit to financing where appropriate for our business. Our ability to arrange or provide financing for our customers will depend on a number of factors, including our credit rating, our level of available credit and our ability to sell off commitments on acceptable terms. In addition, if local currencies cannot be hedged, we have an inherent exposure in our ability to convert monies at favorable rates from or to U.S. dollars. More generally, we expect to routinely enter into long-term contracts involving significant amounts to be paid by our customers over time. Pursuant to these contracts, we may deliver products and services representing an important portion of the contract price before receiving any significant payment from the customer. As a result of the financing that may be provided to customers and our commercial risk exposure under long-term contracts, our business could be adversely affected if the financial condition of our customers erodes. Over the past few years, certain of our customers have filed with the courts seeking protection under the bankruptcy or reorganization laws of the applicable jurisdiction, or have experienced financial difficulties. The financial healthiness may be exacerbated in many emerging markets, where our customers are being affected not only by recession, but by deteriorating local currencies and a lack of credit. Upon the financial failure of a customer, we may experience losses on credit extended and loans made to such customer, losses relating to our commercial risk exposure and the loss of the customer’s ongoing business. If customers fail to meet their obligations to us, we may experience reduced cash flows and losses in excess of reserves, which could materially adversely impact our results of operations and financial position. Our customers may not pay for products and services in a timely manner, or at all, which would decrease our cash flows and adversely affect our working capital. Our business requires extensive credit risk management that may not be adequate to protect against customer nonpayment. A risk of non-payment by customers is a significant focus of our business. We expect a significant amount of future revenue to come from international customers, many of whom will be startup telecommunications operators in developing countries. We do not generally expect to obtain collateral for sales, although we require letters of credit or credit insurance as appropriate for international customers. For information regarding the percentage of revenue attributable to certain key customers, see the risks discussed in the following risk factor. Our historical accounts receivable balances have been concentrated in a small number of significant customers. Unexpected adverse events impacting the financial condition of our customers, bank failures or other unfavorable regulatory, economic or political events in the countries in which we do business may impact collections and adversely impact our business, require increased bad debt expense or receivable write-offs and adversely impact our cash flows, financial condition and operating results, which could also result in a breach of our bank covenants. Because a significant amount of our revenue may come from a limited number of customers, the termination of any of these customer relationships may adversely affect our business. Sales of our products and services historically have been concentrated in a small number of customers. Principal customers for our products and services include domestic and international wireless/mobile service providers, OEMs, as well as private network users such as public safety agencies; government institutions; and utility, pipeline, railroad and other industrial enterprises that operate broadband wireless networks. We had revenue from two customers that each exceeded 10% of our total revenue during fiscal 2013, and one customer in each of 2014 and 2012. Although we have a large customer base, during any given quarter a small number of customers may account for a significant portion of our revenue. It is possible that a significant portion of our future product sales also could become even more concentrated in a limited number of customers as currently, one of our customers, MTN, represented over 10% of our revenue. In addition, product sales to major customers have varied widely from period to period. The loss of any existing customer, a significant reduction in the level of sales to any existing customer, or our inability to gain additional customers could result in declines in our revenue or an inability to grow revenue. In addition, further consolidation of our potential customer base could result in purchasing decision delays as consolidating customers integrate their operations and could generally reduce our opportunities to win new customers to the extent that the number of potential customers decreases. Furthermore, as our customers become larger, they may have more leverage to negotiate better pricing which could adversely affect our revenues and gross margins. 20 Consolidation within the telecommunications industry could result in a decrease in our revenue. The telecommunications industry has experienced significant consolidation among its participants, and we expect bankruptcy protection. Other operators may merge and one or more of our competitors may supply products to the customers of the combined company following those mergers. This consolidation could result in purchasing decision delays and decreased opportunities for us to supply products to companies following any consolidation. This consolidation may also result in lost opportunities for cost reduction and economies of scale. We continually evaluate strategic opportunities which could involve merger and/or acquisition activities that could disrupt our operations and harm our operating results. Our growth depends upon market growth, our ability to enhance our existing products and our ability to introduce new products on a timely basis. We intend to continue to address the need to develop new products and enhance existing products through acquisitions, or “tuck-ins,” product lines, technologies, and personnel. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following: difficulties in integrating the operations, systems, technologies, products, and personnel of the acquired companies, particularly companies with large and widespread operations and/or complex products; diversion of management's attention from normal daily operations of the business and the challenges of managing larger and more widespread operations resulting from acquisitions; potential difficulties in completing projects associated with in-process research and development intangibles; difficulties in entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience and where competitors in each market have stronger market positions; initial dependence on unfamiliar supply chains or relatively small supply partners; insufficient revenue to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions; and the potential loss of key employees, customers, distributors, vendors and other business partners of the companies we acquire following and continuing after announcement of acquisition plans. Acquisitions may also cause us to: issue common stock that would dilute our current stockholders; use a substantial portion of our cash resources, or incur debt; significantly increase our interest expense, leverage and debt service requirements if we incur additional debt to pay for an acquisition; assume material liabilities; record goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that are subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges; incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets; incur tax expenses related to the effect of acquisitions on our intercompany R&D cost sharing arrangement and legal structure; incur large and immediate write-offs and restructuring and other related expenses; and become subject to intellectual property or other litigation. Mergers and acquisitions of high-technology companies are inherently risky and subject to many factors outside of our control. No assurance can be given that our previous or future acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions could materially harm our business and operating results. Even when an acquired company has already developed and marketed products, there can be no assurance that product enhancements will be made in a timely fashion or that pre-acquisition due diligence will have identified all possible issues that might arise with respect to such products. Our quarterly results may be volatile, which can adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Our quarterly operating results may vary significantly for a variety of reasons, many of which are outside our control. These factors could harm our business and include, among others: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • shipments, canceled orders and lost or deferred revenues, as well as material damage to our customer relationships. Should this occur, our operating results, cash flows and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Credit and commercial risks and exposures could increase if the financial condition of our customers declines. A substantial portion of our sales are to customers in the telecommunications industry. These customers may require their suppliers to provide extended payment terms, direct loans or other forms of financial support as a condition to obtaining commercial contracts. We expect that we may provide or commit to financing where appropriate for our business. Our ability to arrange or provide financing for our customers will depend on a number of factors, including our credit rating, our level of available credit and our ability to sell off commitments on acceptable terms. In addition, if local currencies cannot be hedged, we have an inherent exposure in our ability to convert monies at favorable rates from or to U.S. dollars. More generally, we expect to routinely enter into long-term contracts involving significant amounts to be paid by our customers over time. Pursuant to these contracts, we may deliver products and services representing an important portion of the contract price before receiving any significant payment from the customer. As a result of the financing that may be provided to customers and our commercial risk exposure under long-term contracts, our business could be adversely affected if the financial condition of our customers erodes. Over the past few years, certain of our customers have filed with the courts seeking protection under the bankruptcy or reorganization laws of the applicable jurisdiction, or have experienced financial difficulties. The financial healthiness may be exacerbated in many emerging markets, where our customers are being affected not only by recession, but by deteriorating local currencies and a lack of credit. Upon the financial failure of a customer, we may experience losses on credit extended and loans made to such customer, losses relating to our commercial risk exposure and the loss of the customer’s ongoing business. If customers fail to meet their obligations to us, we may experience reduced cash flows and losses in excess of reserves, which could materially adversely impact our results of operations and financial position. Our customers may not pay for products and services in a timely manner, or at all, which would decrease our cash flows and adversely affect our working capital. Our business requires extensive credit risk management that may not be adequate to protect against customer nonpayment. A risk of non-payment by customers is a significant focus of our business. We expect a significant amount of future revenue to come from international customers, many of whom will be startup telecommunications operators in developing countries. We do not generally expect to obtain collateral for sales, although we require letters of credit or credit insurance as appropriate for international customers. For information regarding the percentage of revenue attributable to certain key customers, see the risks discussed in the following risk factor. Our historical accounts receivable balances have been concentrated in a small number of significant customers. Unexpected adverse events impacting the financial condition of our customers, bank failures or other unfavorable regulatory, economic or political events in the countries in which we do business may impact collections and adversely impact our business, require increased bad debt expense or receivable write-offs and adversely impact our cash flows, financial condition and operating results, which could also result in a breach of our bank covenants. Because a significant amount of our revenue may come from a limited number of customers, the termination of any of these customer relationships may adversely affect our business. Sales of our products and services historically have been concentrated in a small number of customers. Principal customers for our products and services include domestic and international wireless/mobile service providers, OEMs, as well as private network users such as public safety agencies; government institutions; and utility, pipeline, railroad and other industrial enterprises that operate broadband wireless networks. We had revenue from two customers that each exceeded 10% of our total revenue during fiscal 2013, and one customer in each of 2014 and 2012. Although we have a large customer base, during any given quarter a small number of customers may account for a significant portion of our revenue. It is possible that a significant portion of our future product sales also could become even more concentrated in a limited number of customers as currently, one of our customers, MTN, represented over 10% of our revenue. In addition, product sales to major customers have varied widely from period to period. The loss of any existing customer, a significant reduction in the level of sales to any existing customer, or our inability to gain additional customers could result in declines in our revenue or an inability to grow revenue. In addition, further consolidation of our potential customer base could result in purchasing decision delays as consolidating customers integrate their operations and could generally reduce our opportunities to win new customers to the extent that the number of potential customers decreases. Furthermore, as our customers become larger, they may have more leverage to negotiate better pricing which could adversely affect our revenues and gross margins. Consolidation within the telecommunications industry could result in a decrease in our revenue. The telecommunications industry has experienced significant consolidation among its participants, and we expect this trend to continue. Some operators in this industry have experienced financial difficulty and have filed, or may file, for bankruptcy protection. Other operators may merge and one or more of our competitors may supply products to the customers of the combined company following those mergers. This consolidation could result in purchasing decision delays and decreased opportunities for us to supply products to companies following any consolidation. This consolidation may also result in lost opportunities for cost reduction and economies of scale. We continually evaluate strategic opportunities which could involve merger and/or acquisition activities that could disrupt our operations and harm our operating results. Our growth depends upon market growth, our ability to enhance our existing products and our ability to introduce new products on a timely basis. We intend to continue to address the need to develop new products and enhance existing products through acquisitions, or “tuck-ins,” product lines, technologies, and personnel. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following: • • • • • • • difficulties in integrating the operations, systems, technologies, products, and personnel of the acquired companies, particularly companies with large and widespread operations and/or complex products; diversion of management's attention from normal daily operations of the business and the challenges of managing larger and more widespread operations resulting from acquisitions; potential difficulties in completing projects associated with in-process research and development intangibles; difficulties in entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience and where competitors in each market have stronger market positions; initial dependence on unfamiliar supply chains or relatively small supply partners; insufficient revenue to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions; and the potential loss of key employees, customers, distributors, vendors and other business partners of the companies we acquire following and continuing after announcement of acquisition plans. A n n u a l R e p o r t Acquisitions may also cause us to: • • • • • • • • • issue common stock that would dilute our current stockholders; use a substantial portion of our cash resources, or incur debt; significantly increase our interest expense, leverage and debt service requirements if we incur additional debt to pay for an acquisition; assume material liabilities; record goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that are subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges; incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets; incur tax expenses related to the effect of acquisitions on our intercompany R&D cost sharing arrangement and legal structure; incur large and immediate write-offs and restructuring and other related expenses; and become subject to intellectual property or other litigation. Mergers and acquisitions of high-technology companies are inherently risky and subject to many factors outside of our control. No assurance can be given that our previous or future acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions could materially harm our business and operating results. Even when an acquired company has already developed and marketed products, there can be no assurance that product enhancements will be made in a timely fashion or that pre-acquisition due diligence will have identified all possible issues that might arise with respect to such products. Our quarterly results may be volatile, which can adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Our quarterly operating results may vary significantly for a variety of reasons, many of which are outside our control. These factors could harm our business and include, among others: 21 • • • seasonality in the purchasing habits of our customers; If we fail to develop and maintain distribution and licensing relationships, our revenue may decrease. the volume and timing of product orders and the timing of completion of our product deliveries and installations; our ability and the ability of our key suppliers to respond to changes on demand as needed; t r o p e R l a u n n A • margin variability based on geographic and product mix; • • • • • • • • • • our suppliers’ inability to perform and deliver on time as a result of their financial condition, component shortages or other supply chain constraints; retention of key personnel; the length of our sales cycle; litigation costs and expenses; continued timely rollout of new product functionality and features; increased competition resulting in downward pressure on the price of our products and services; unexpected delays in the schedule for shipments of existing products and new generations of the existing platforms; failure to realize expected cost improvement throughout our supply chain; order cancellations or postponements in product deliveries resulting in delayed revenue recognition; restructuring and streamlining of our operations; • war and acts of terrorism; • • • • • • natural disasters; the ability of our customers to obtain financing to enable their purchase of our products; fluctuations in international currency exchange rates; regulatory developments including denial of export and import licenses; general economic conditions worldwide that affect demand and financing for microwave and millimeter wave telecommunications networks; and the timing and size of future restructuring plans and write-offs. Our quarterly results are expected to be difficult to predict and delays in product delivery or closing a sale can cause revenue, margins and net income or loss to fluctuate significantly from anticipated levels. A substantial portion of our contracts are completed in the latter part of a quarter and a significant percentage of these are large orders. Because a significant portion of our cost structure is largely fixed in the short term, revenue shortfalls tend to have a disproportionately negative impact on our profitability and can increase our inventory. The number of large new transactions also increases the risk of fluctuations in our quarterly results because a delay in even a small number of these transactions could cause our quarterly revenues and profitability to fall significantly short of our predictions. In addition, we may increase spending in response to competition or in pursuit of new market opportunities. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurances that we will be able to achieve profitability in the future or that if profitability is attained, that we will be able to sustain profitability, particularly on a quarter-to-quarter basis. If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, we may be deprived of legal recourse against those who misappropriate our intellectual property. Our ability to compete will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce intellectual property protection for our technology in the U.S. and internationally. We rely upon a combination of trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights, patents and contractual rights to protect our intellectual property. In addition, we enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, and enter into non-disclosure agreements with our suppliers and appropriate customers so as to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. We cannot give assurances that any steps taken by us will be adequate to deter misappropriation or impede independent third-party development of similar technologies. In the event that such intellectual property arrangements are insufficient, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. We have significant operations in the U.S., United Kingdom, Singapore and New Zealand, and outsourcing arrangements in Asia and the U.S. We cannot provide assurances that the protection provided to our intellectual property by the laws and courts of particular nations will be substantially similar to the protection and remedies available under U.S. law. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurances that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us based on intellectual property rights and laws in other nations that are different from those established in the U.S. 22 Although a majority of our sales are made through our direct sales force, we also market our products through indirect sales channels such as independent agents, distributors, OEMs and systems integrators. These relationships enhance our ability to pursue major contract awards and, in some cases, are intended to provide our customers with easier access to financing and a greater variety of equipment and service capabilities, which an integrated system provider should be able to offer. We may not be able to maintain and develop additional relationships. If additional relationships are developed, they may not be successful. Furthermore, as we consider increasing licensing revenue based on upgraded technology, we may not be successful in transitioning customers to the planned software upgrades. Our inability to establish or maintain these distribution and licensing relationships could restrict our ability to market our products and thereby result in significant reductions in revenue. If these revenue reductions occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be harmed. If sufficient radio frequency spectrum is not allocated for use by our products, or we fail to obtain regulatory approval for our products, our ability to market our products may be restricted. We will be affected by the allocation and auction of the radio frequency spectrum by governmental authorities both in the U.S. and internationally. These governmental authorities may not allocate sufficient radio frequency spectrum for use by our products or we may not be successful in obtaining regulatory approval for our products from these authorities. Historically, in many developed countries, the unavailability of frequency spectrum has inhibited the growth of wireless telecommunications networks. In addition, to operate in a jurisdiction, we must obtain regulatory approval for our products. Each jurisdiction in which we market our products has its own regulations governing radio communications. Products that support emerging wireless telecommunications services can be marketed in a jurisdiction only if permitted by suitable frequency allocations, auctions and regulations. The process of establishing new regulations is complex and lengthy. If we are unable to obtain sufficient allocation of radio frequency spectrum by the appropriate governmental authority or obtain the proper regulatory approval for our products, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be harmed. Radio communications are subject to regulation by U.S. and foreign laws and international treaties. Generally, our products need to conform to a variety of United States and international requirements established to avoid interference among users of transmission frequencies and to permit interconnection of telecommunications equipment. Any delays in compliance with respect to our future products could delay the introduction of such products. Our business is subject to changing regulation of corporate governance, public disclosure and anti-bribery measures which have resulted in increased costs and may continue to result in additional costs in the future and/or potential liabilities. We are subject to rules and regulations of federal and state regulatory authorities, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) and financial market entities charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and foreign and domestic legislative bodies. During the past few years, these entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC, NASDAQ and several foreign governments such as the governments of the United Kingdom and Brazil, have issued requirements, laws and regulations and continue to develop additional requirements, laws and regulations, most notably the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), and recent laws and regulations regarding bribery and unfair competition. Our efforts to comply with these requirements and regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of substantial management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Moreover, because these laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs potentially necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. Finally, if we are unable to ensure compliance with such requirements, laws, or regulations, we may be subject to costly prosecution and liability, and resulting reputational harm, from such noncompliance. We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements. In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 27, 2014, we have concluded that there are material weaknesses relating to our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • the volume and timing of product orders and the timing of completion of our product deliveries and installations; our ability and the ability of our key suppliers to respond to changes on demand as needed; • margin variability based on geographic and product mix; our suppliers’ inability to perform and deliver on time as a result of their financial condition, component shortages or other supply chain constraints; retention of key personnel; the length of our sales cycle; litigation costs and expenses; continued timely rollout of new product functionality and features; increased competition resulting in downward pressure on the price of our products and services; unexpected delays in the schedule for shipments of existing products and new generations of the existing platforms; failure to realize expected cost improvement throughout our supply chain; order cancellations or postponements in product deliveries resulting in delayed revenue recognition; restructuring and streamlining of our operations; • war and acts of terrorism; natural disasters; the ability of our customers to obtain financing to enable their purchase of our products; fluctuations in international currency exchange rates; regulatory developments including denial of export and import licenses; general economic conditions worldwide that affect demand and financing for microwave and millimeter wave telecommunications networks; and the timing and size of future restructuring plans and write-offs. Our quarterly results are expected to be difficult to predict and delays in product delivery or closing a sale can cause revenue, margins and net income or loss to fluctuate significantly from anticipated levels. A substantial portion of our contracts are completed in the latter part of a quarter and a significant percentage of these are large orders. Because a significant portion of our cost structure is largely fixed in the short term, revenue shortfalls tend to have a disproportionately negative impact on our profitability and can increase our inventory. The number of large new transactions also increases the risk of fluctuations in our quarterly results because a delay in even a small number of these transactions could cause our quarterly revenues and profitability to fall significantly short of our predictions. In addition, we may increase spending in response to competition or in pursuit of new market opportunities. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurances that we will be able to achieve profitability in the future or that if profitability is attained, that we will be able to sustain profitability, particularly on a quarter-to-quarter basis. If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, we may be deprived of legal recourse against those who misappropriate our intellectual property. Our ability to compete will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce intellectual property protection for our technology in the U.S. and internationally. We rely upon a combination of trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights, patents and contractual rights to protect our intellectual property. In addition, we enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, and enter into non-disclosure agreements with our suppliers and appropriate customers so as to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. We cannot give assurances that any steps taken by us will be adequate to deter misappropriation or impede independent third-party development of similar technologies. In the event that such intellectual property arrangements are insufficient, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. We have significant operations in the U.S., United Kingdom, Singapore and New Zealand, and outsourcing arrangements in Asia and the U.S. We cannot provide assurances that the protection provided to our intellectual property by the laws and courts of particular nations will be substantially similar to the protection and remedies available under U.S. law. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurances that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us based on intellectual property rights and laws in other nations that are different from those established in the U.S. seasonality in the purchasing habits of our customers; If we fail to develop and maintain distribution and licensing relationships, our revenue may decrease. Although a majority of our sales are made through our direct sales force, we also market our products through indirect sales channels such as independent agents, distributors, OEMs and systems integrators. These relationships enhance our ability to pursue major contract awards and, in some cases, are intended to provide our customers with easier access to financing and a greater variety of equipment and service capabilities, which an integrated system provider should be able to offer. We may not be able to maintain and develop additional relationships. If additional relationships are developed, they may not be successful. Furthermore, as we consider increasing licensing revenue based on upgraded technology, we may not be successful in transitioning customers to the planned software upgrades. Our inability to establish or maintain these distribution and licensing relationships could restrict our ability to market our products and thereby result in significant reductions in revenue. If these revenue reductions occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be harmed. If sufficient radio frequency spectrum is not allocated for use by our products, or we fail to obtain regulatory approval for our products, our ability to market our products may be restricted. We will be affected by the allocation and auction of the radio frequency spectrum by governmental authorities both in the U.S. and internationally. These governmental authorities may not allocate sufficient radio frequency spectrum for use by our products or we may not be successful in obtaining regulatory approval for our products from these authorities. Historically, in many developed countries, the unavailability of frequency spectrum has inhibited the growth of wireless telecommunications networks. In addition, to operate in a jurisdiction, we must obtain regulatory approval for our products. Each jurisdiction in which we market our products has its own regulations governing radio communications. Products that support emerging wireless telecommunications services can be marketed in a jurisdiction only if permitted by suitable frequency allocations, auctions and regulations. The process of establishing new regulations is complex and lengthy. If we are unable to obtain sufficient allocation of radio frequency spectrum by the appropriate governmental authority or obtain the proper regulatory approval for our products, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be harmed. A n n u a l R e p o r t Radio communications are subject to regulation by U.S. and foreign laws and international treaties. Generally, our products need to conform to a variety of United States and international requirements established to avoid interference among users of transmission frequencies and to permit interconnection of telecommunications equipment. Any delays in compliance with respect to our future products could delay the introduction of such products. Our business is subject to changing regulation of corporate governance, public disclosure and anti-bribery measures which have resulted in increased costs and may continue to result in additional costs in the future and/or potential liabilities. We are subject to rules and regulations of federal and state regulatory authorities, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) and financial market entities charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and foreign and domestic legislative bodies. During the past few years, these entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC, NASDAQ and several foreign governments such as the governments of the United Kingdom and Brazil, have issued requirements, laws and regulations and continue to develop additional requirements, laws and regulations, most notably the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), and recent laws and regulations regarding bribery and unfair competition. Our efforts to comply with these requirements and regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of substantial management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Moreover, because these laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs potentially necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. Finally, if we are unable to ensure compliance with such requirements, laws, or regulations, we may be subject to costly prosecution and liability, and resulting reputational harm, from such noncompliance. We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements. In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 27, 2014, we have concluded that there are material weaknesses relating to our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. 23 Specifically, we identified material weaknesses relating to (i) our controls pertaining to the control environment, risk computer programmers and hackers, or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such t r o p e R l a u n n A assessment, monitoring activities and information and communication activities; (ii) ensuring that we identified, accumulated and documented appropriate information necessary to support manual journal entries; (iii) ensuring that account reconciliations were reviewed and approved for accuracy and completeness and that we identified, accumulated and documented appropriate information necessary to support account balances; and (iv) ensuring that the reported amount and timing of revenue recognition was accurate. For additional information on these matters, see Part II, Item 9A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result of these material weaknesses, management has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting were not effective as of June 27, 2014. Subsequent to our June 27, 2014 fiscal year end, we began taking a number of actions, including designing and implementing new controls and revising existing controls, in order to remediate the material weaknesses described above. We expect to continue our remediation efforts, including testing of operating effectiveness of new controls during the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015. We expect to incur additional costs remediating these material weaknesses. We may need to take additional measures to fully mitigate the material weaknesses, and the measures we have taken, and expect to take, to improve our internal controls may not be sufficient to address the issues identified, to ensure that our internal controls are effective or to ensure that the identified material weaknesses will not result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements. In addition, other material weaknesses or deficiencies may be identified in the future. If we are unable to correct material weaknesses or deficiencies in internal controls in a timely manner, our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information accurately and within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC will be adversely affected. This failure could negatively affect the market price and trading liquidity of our common stock, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, subject us to civil and criminal investigations and penalties, and generally materially and adversely impact our business and financial condition. Our products are used in critical communications networks which may subject us to significant liability claims. Because our products are used in critical communications networks, we may be subject to significant liability claims if our products do not work properly. We warrant to our current customers that our products will operate in accordance with our product specifications. If our products fail to conform to these specifications, our customers could require us to remedy the failure or could assert claims for damages. The provisions in our agreements with customers that are intended to limit our exposure to liability claims may not preclude all potential claims. In addition, any insurance policies we have may not adequately limit our exposure with respect to such claims. Liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or to pay significant damages. Any such claims, whether or not successful, would be costly and time-consuming to defend, and could divert management’s attention and seriously damage our reputation and our business. We may be subject to litigation regarding intellectual property associated with our wireless business. This litigation could be costly to defend and resolve, and could prevent us from using or selling the challenged technology. The wireless telecommunications industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights, which has resulted in often protracted and expensive litigation. Any litigation regarding patents or other intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert our management and key personnel from our business operations. The complexity of the technology involved and the uncertainty of intellectual property litigation increase these risks. Such litigation or claims could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources. In the event of an adverse result in any such litigation, we could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the use and transfer of allegedly infringing technology or the sale of allegedly infringing products and expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or obtain licenses for the infringing technology. We can give no assurances that we would be successful in developing such non-infringing technology or that any license for the infringing technology would be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. This could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operation, financial condition, competitive position and prospects. System security risks, data protection breaches, and cyber-attacks could compromise our proprietary information, disrupt our internal operations and harm public perception of our security products, which could cause our business and reputation to suffer and adversely affect our stock price. In the ordinary course of business, we store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and proprietary information of our customers, suppliers and business partners, on our networks. The secure maintenance of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Increasingly, companies, including Aviat Networks are subject to a wide variety of attacks on their networks on an ongoing basis. Despite our security measures, Aviat Networks' information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to penetration or attacks by 24 breach could compromise our networks, creating system disruptions or slowdowns and exploiting security vulnerabilities of our products, and the information stored on our networks could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen, which could subject us to liability to our customers, suppliers, business partners and others, and cause us reputational and financial harm. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of our networks. If an actual or perceived breach of network security occurs in our network or in the network of a customer of our security products, regardless of whether the breach is attributable to our products, the market perception of the effectiveness of our products could be harmed. Because the techniques used by computer programmers and hackers, many of whom are highly sophisticated and well-funded, to access or sabotage networks change frequently and generally are not recognized until after they are used, we may be unable to anticipate or immediately detect these techniques. This could impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution or other critical functions. In addition, the economic costs to us to eliminate or alleviate cyber or other security problems, bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software systems and security vulnerabilities could be significant and may be difficult to anticipate or measure because the damage may differ based on the identity and motive of the programmer or hacker, which are often difficult to identify. Anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law and provisions in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws could make a third-party acquisition of us difficult. Because we are a Delaware corporation, the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the change in control would be supported by our stockholders. We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware, which prohibits us from engaging in certain business combinations, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. In addition, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws also contain certain provisions that may make a third-party acquisition of us difficult, including the ability of the Board of Directors to issue preferred stock and the requirement that nominations for directors and other proposals by stockholders must be made in advance of the meeting at which directors are elected or the proposals are voted upon. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties As of June 27, 2014, we leased approximately 374,000 square feet of facilities worldwide, with approximately 63% in North America, mostly in California, Texas, North Carolina and Montreal. Our corporate headquarters are located in Santa Clara, California, and consist of a building of approximately 129,000 square feet. The lease for our headquarters expires in April 2020 and we plan to sublease a portion of the facility as part of our restructuring plan. We also lease approximately 40,000 square feet of office and assembly facilities in San Antonio and Austin, Texas. Internationally, we lease approximately 144,000 square feet of facilities throughout Europe, Central America, South America, Africa and Asia regions, including offices in Singapore, Slovenia, Philippine Islands, India, Mexico, South Africa, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, France, Kenya, Poland, Australia Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Thailand, and Malaysia. In addition, we own approximately 110,000 square feet of facilities in Wellington, New Zealand and Lanarkshire, Scotland. We maintain our facilities in good operating condition, and believe that they are suitable and adequate for our current and projected needs. We continuously review our anticipated requirements for facilities and may, from time to time, acquire additional facilities, expand existing facilities, or dispose of existing facilities or parts thereof, as we deem necessary. For more information about our lease obligations, see “Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies” of notes to consolidated financial statements, which are included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Specifically, we identified material weaknesses relating to (i) our controls pertaining to the control environment, risk assessment, monitoring activities and information and communication activities; (ii) ensuring that we identified, accumulated and documented appropriate information necessary to support manual journal entries; (iii) ensuring that account reconciliations were reviewed and approved for accuracy and completeness and that we identified, accumulated and documented appropriate information necessary to support account balances; and (iv) ensuring that the reported amount and timing of revenue recognition was accurate. For additional information on these matters, see Part II, Item 9A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result of these material weaknesses, management has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting were not effective as of June 27, 2014. Subsequent to our June 27, 2014 fiscal year end, we began taking a number of actions, including designing and implementing new controls and revising existing controls, in order to remediate the material weaknesses described above. We expect to continue our remediation efforts, including testing of operating effectiveness of new controls during the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015. We expect to incur additional costs remediating these material weaknesses. We may need to take additional measures to fully mitigate the material weaknesses, and the measures we have taken, and expect to take, to improve our internal controls may not be sufficient to address the issues identified, to ensure that our internal controls are effective or to ensure that the identified material weaknesses will not result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements. In addition, other material weaknesses or deficiencies may be identified in the future. If we are unable to correct material weaknesses or deficiencies in internal controls in a timely manner, our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information accurately and within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC will be adversely affected. This failure could negatively affect the market price and trading liquidity of our common stock, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, subject us to civil and criminal investigations and penalties, and generally materially and adversely impact our business and financial condition. Our products are used in critical communications networks which may subject us to significant liability claims. Because our products are used in critical communications networks, we may be subject to significant liability claims if our products do not work properly. We warrant to our current customers that our products will operate in accordance with our product specifications. If our products fail to conform to these specifications, our customers could require us to remedy the failure or could assert claims for damages. The provisions in our agreements with customers that are intended to limit our exposure to liability claims may not preclude all potential claims. In addition, any insurance policies we have may not adequately limit our exposure with respect to such claims. Liability claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or to pay significant damages. Any such claims, whether or not successful, would be costly and time-consuming to defend, and could divert management’s attention and seriously damage our reputation and our business. We may be subject to litigation regarding intellectual property associated with our wireless business. This litigation could be costly to defend and resolve, and could prevent us from using or selling the challenged technology. The wireless telecommunications industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights, which has resulted in often protracted and expensive litigation. Any litigation regarding patents or other intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert our management and key personnel from our business operations. The complexity of the technology involved and the uncertainty of intellectual property litigation increase these risks. Such litigation or claims could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources. In the event of an adverse result in any such litigation, we could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the use and transfer of allegedly infringing technology or the sale of allegedly infringing products and expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or obtain licenses for the infringing technology. We can give no assurances that we would be successful in developing such non-infringing technology or that any license for the infringing technology would be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. This could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operation, financial condition, competitive position and prospects. and reputation to suffer and adversely affect our stock price. In the ordinary course of business, we store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and proprietary information of our customers, suppliers and business partners, on our networks. The secure maintenance of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Increasingly, companies, including Aviat Networks are subject to a wide variety of attacks on their networks on an ongoing basis. Despite our security measures, Aviat Networks' information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to penetration or attacks by computer programmers and hackers, or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks, creating system disruptions or slowdowns and exploiting security vulnerabilities of our products, and the information stored on our networks could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen, which could subject us to liability to our customers, suppliers, business partners and others, and cause us reputational and financial harm. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including “bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of our networks. If an actual or perceived breach of network security occurs in our network or in the network of a customer of our security products, regardless of whether the breach is attributable to our products, the market perception of the effectiveness of our products could be harmed. Because the techniques used by computer programmers and hackers, many of whom are highly sophisticated and well-funded, to access or sabotage networks change frequently and generally are not recognized until after they are used, we may be unable to anticipate or immediately detect these techniques. This could impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution or other critical functions. In addition, the economic costs to us to eliminate or alleviate cyber or other security problems, bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software systems and security vulnerabilities could be significant and may be difficult to anticipate or measure because the damage may differ based on the identity and motive of the programmer or hacker, which are often difficult to identify. Anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law and provisions in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws could make a third-party acquisition of us difficult. Because we are a Delaware corporation, the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the change in control would be supported by our stockholders. We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware, which prohibits us from engaging in certain business combinations, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. In addition, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws also contain certain provisions that may make a third-party acquisition of us difficult, including the ability of the Board of Directors to issue preferred stock and the requirement that nominations for directors and other proposals by stockholders must be made in advance of the meeting at which directors are elected or the proposals are voted upon. A n n u a l R e p o r t Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties As of June 27, 2014, we leased approximately 374,000 square feet of facilities worldwide, with approximately 63% in North America, mostly in California, Texas, North Carolina and Montreal. Our corporate headquarters are located in Santa Clara, California, and consist of a building of approximately 129,000 square feet. The lease for our headquarters expires in April 2020 and we plan to sublease a portion of the facility as part of our restructuring plan. We also lease approximately 40,000 square feet of office and assembly facilities in San Antonio and Austin, Texas. Internationally, we lease approximately 144,000 square feet of facilities throughout Europe, Central America, South America, Africa and Asia regions, including offices in Singapore, Slovenia, Philippine Islands, India, Mexico, South Africa, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, France, Kenya, Poland, Australia Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Thailand, and Malaysia. In addition, we own approximately 110,000 square feet of facilities in Wellington, New Zealand and Lanarkshire, Scotland. We maintain our facilities in good operating condition, and believe that they are suitable and adequate for our current and projected needs. We continuously review our anticipated requirements for facilities and may, from time to time, acquire additional facilities, expand existing facilities, or dispose of existing facilities or parts thereof, as we deem necessary. System security risks, data protection breaches, and cyber-attacks could compromise our proprietary information, disrupt our internal operations and harm public perception of our security products, which could cause our business For more information about our lease obligations, see “Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies” of notes to consolidated financial statements, which are included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 25 Item 3. Legal Proceedings PART II From time to time, we may be involved in various legal claims and litigation that arise in the normal course of our operations. We record accruals for our outstanding legal proceedings, investigations or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We evaluate, at least on a quarterly basis, developments in legal proceedings, investigations or claims that could affect the amount of any accrual, as well as any developments that would result in a loss contingency to become both probable and reasonably estimable. While the results of such claims and litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that we are not a party to any litigation the final outcome of which is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, should we not prevail in any such litigation; it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results, cash flows or financial position. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. t r o p e R l a u n n A Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Information and Price Range of Common Stock Our common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, is listed and primarily traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, under the ticker symbol AVNW (prior to January 28, 2010 our ticker symbol was HSTX). There was no established trading market for shares of our common stock prior to January 29, 2007. According to the records of our transfer agent, as of September 4, 2014, there were approximately 4,413 holders of record of our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for a share of our common stock on NASDAQ Global Select Market for the periods indicated during our fiscal years 2014 and 2013: First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.74 $2.57 $2.31 $1.66 $2.39 $1.97 $1.60 $1.00 $2.80 $3.32 $3.75 $3.35 $2.11 $2.28 $3.26 $2.57 Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2013 High Low High Low Dividend Policy We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain any earnings for use in our business. In addition, the covenants of our credit facility may restrict us from paying dividends or making other distributions to our stockholders under certain circumstances. Sales of Unregistered Securities Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities Performance Graph During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we did not issue or sell any unregistered securities. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we did not repurchase any equity securities. The following graph and accompanying data compares the cumulative total return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the Total Return Index for The NASDAQ Composite Market (U.S. Companies) and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index for the five-year period ended June 27, 2014. The stock price performance shown on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. Note that this graph and accompanying data is “furnished,” not “filed,” with the SEC. 26 Item 3. Legal Proceedings PART II From time to time, we may be involved in various legal claims and litigation that arise in the normal course of our operations. We record accruals for our outstanding legal proceedings, investigations or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We evaluate, at least on a quarterly basis, developments in legal proceedings, investigations or claims that could affect the amount of any accrual, as well as any developments that would result in a loss contingency to become both probable and reasonably estimable. While the results of such claims and litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that we are not a party to any litigation the final outcome of which is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, should we not prevail in any such litigation; it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results, cash flows or financial position. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Information and Price Range of Common Stock Our common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, is listed and primarily traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, under the ticker symbol AVNW (prior to January 28, 2010 our ticker symbol was HSTX). There was no established trading market for shares of our common stock prior to January 29, 2007. According to the records of our transfer agent, as of September 4, 2014, there were approximately 4,413 holders of record of our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for a share of our common stock on NASDAQ Global Select Market for the periods indicated during our fiscal years 2014 and 2013: First Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.74 $2.57 $2.31 $1.66 $2.39 $1.97 $1.60 $1.00 $2.80 $3.32 $3.75 $3.35 $2.11 $2.28 $3.26 $2.57 Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2013 High Low High Low Dividend Policy We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain any earnings for use in our business. In addition, the covenants of our credit facility may restrict us from paying dividends or making other distributions to our stockholders under certain circumstances. A n n u a l R e p o r t Sales of Unregistered Securities During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we did not issue or sell any unregistered securities. Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we did not repurchase any equity securities. Performance Graph The following graph and accompanying data compares the cumulative total return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the Total Return Index for The NASDAQ Composite Market (U.S. Companies) and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index for the five-year period ended June 27, 2014. The stock price performance shown on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. Note that this graph and accompanying data is “furnished,” not “filed,” with the SEC. 27 COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Aviat Networks, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 7/3/09 t r o p e R l a u n n A 7/2/10 7/1/11 6/29/12 6/28/13 6/27/14 Aviat Networks, Inc. NASDAQ Composite NASDAQ Telecommunications June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 July 1, 2011 July 2, 2010 Aviat Networks, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NASDAQ Composite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NASDAQ Telecommunications. . . . . . . 100.00 100.00 100.00 56.91 117.49 100.95 64.39 159.65 118.79 45.53 168.23 103.87 42.60 197.84 133.40 20.33 258.87 154.98 7/3/2009 7/2/2010 7/1/2011 6/29/2012 6/28/2013 6/27/2014 ____________________________ * Assumes (i) $100 invested on July 3, 2009 in Aviat Networks, Inc. common stock, the Total Return Index for The NASDAQ Composite Market (U.S. companies) and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index; and (ii) immediate reinvestment of all dividends. Item 6. Selected Financial Data The following table summarizes our selected historical financial information for each of the last five fiscal years that has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. Data presented for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012 are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This table should be read in conjunction with our other financial information, including “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 28 June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 July 1, 2011 July 2, 2010 Fiscal Year Ended (In millions) Revenue from product sales and services . . . . . . . $ 346.0 $ 471.3 $ 444.0 $ 452.1 $ Cost of product sales and services. . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic and diluted loss per common share: 260.9 (52.1) (51.2) 331.2 (10.9) (15.0) 312.3 (15.5) (24.1) 324.0 (58.8) (90.5) Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.85) $ (0.18) $ (0.26) $ (1.00) $ Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (0.83) (0.25) (0.41) (1.54) June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 July 1, 2011 July 2, 2010 As of (In millions) Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 253.2 $ 305.8 $ 329.6 $ 383.9 $ Long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total net assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.7 102.6 24.8 149.9 24.7 157.5 15.1 177.7 The following table summarizes certain charges, expenses and gains included in our net losses for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended June 27, 2014: Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.4 $ 6.4 $ $ 4.8 $ Goodwill impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rebranding and transitional costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charges for product transition, product discontinuances and inventory mark-downs . . . Amortization of purchased technology and intangible assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of the fair value adjustments related to fixed assets and inventory . . . . . . . . . Gains from sale of building and Telsima acquisition purchase price settlement . . . . . . . . NetBoss bad debt expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . Loss on sale of NetBoss assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional tax assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liquidation of entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — 1.2 0.4 11.1 — — — — 0.6 — 0.2 — — — — — 1.0 3.1 — — — — 1.4 — Fiscal Year Ended (In millions) 5.2 5.6 — — — 1.0 2.3 2.3 — — 0.8 — 0.6 — — 3.4 15.4 — — — 0.9 6.6 0.2 — — 4.6 2.8 0.8 (0.9) Other adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (0.7) $ 16.9 $ 11.2 $ 17.8 $ 38.6 $ 112.6 465.5 332.7 (108.4) (130.2) (1.82) (2.19) 447.0 17.2 263.2 3.1 — 57.7 8.7 8.4 16.9 12.3 7.1 0.6 (2.2) — — — — — COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Aviat Networks, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 7/3/09 7/2/10 7/1/11 6/29/12 6/28/13 6/27/14 Aviat Networks, Inc. NASDAQ Composite NASDAQ Telecommunications Aviat Networks, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NASDAQ Composite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NASDAQ Telecommunications. . . . . . . 100.00 100.00 100.00 56.91 117.49 100.95 64.39 159.65 118.79 45.53 168.23 103.87 42.60 197.84 133.40 20.33 258.87 154.98 7/3/2009 7/2/2010 7/1/2011 6/29/2012 6/28/2013 6/27/2014 * Assumes (i) $100 invested on July 3, 2009 in Aviat Networks, Inc. common stock, the Total Return Index for The NASDAQ Composite Market (U.S. companies) and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index; and (ii) immediate ____________________________ reinvestment of all dividends. Item 6. Selected Financial Data The following table summarizes our selected historical financial information for each of the last five fiscal years that has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. Data presented for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012 are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This table should be read in conjunction with our other financial information, including “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 July 1, 2011 July 2, 2010 Fiscal Year Ended Revenue from product sales and services . . . . . . . $ Cost of product sales and services. . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic and diluted loss per common share: (In millions) 346.0 $ 471.3 $ 444.0 $ 452.1 $ 465.5 260.9 (52.1) (51.2) 331.2 (10.9) (15.0) 312.3 (15.5) (24.1) 324.0 (58.8) (90.5) 332.7 (108.4) (130.2) Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . $ Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (0.85) $ (0.83) (0.18) $ (0.25) (0.26) $ (0.41) (1.00) $ (1.54) (1.82) (2.19) June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 July 1, 2011 July 2, 2010 (In millions) As of Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total net assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253.2 $ 305.8 $ 329.6 $ 383.9 $ 19.7 102.6 24.8 149.9 24.7 157.5 15.1 177.7 447.0 17.2 263.2 The following table summarizes certain charges, expenses and gains included in our net losses for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended June 27, 2014: A n n u a l R e p o r t June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 July 1, 2011 July 2, 2010 Fiscal Year Ended (In millions) 3.4 $ 6.4 $ $ 4.8 $ Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . $ Goodwill impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rebranding and transitional costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charges for product transition, product discontinuances and inventory mark-downs . . . Amortization of purchased technology and intangible assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of the fair value adjustments related to fixed assets and inventory . . . . . . . . . Gains from sale of building and Telsima acquisition purchase price settlement . . . . . . . . NetBoss bad debt expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . Loss on sale of NetBoss assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional tax assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liquidation of entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — 1.2 0.4 11.1 — — — — 0.6 — 0.2 5.2 5.6 — — — 1.0 2.3 2.3 — — 0.8 — 0.6 — — 3.1 — 57.7 8.7 8.4 16.9 12.3 7.1 0.6 (2.2) — — — — — — — — 0.9 6.6 3.4 15.4 0.2 — — 4.6 2.8 0.8 (0.9) 38.6 $ 17.8 $ $ 112.6 — — — — — 1.0 3.1 — — — — 1.4 — (0.7) 11.2 $ 16.9 $ 29 t r o p e R l a u n n A Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Overview of Business; Operating Environment and Key Factors Impacting Fiscal 2014 and 2015 Results The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand our results of operations and financial condition. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. In the discussion below, our fiscal year ending July 3, 2015 is referred to as “fiscal 2015” or “2015”; our fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 is referred to as “fiscal 2014” or “2014”; our fiscal year ended June 28, 2013 is referred to as “fiscal 2013” or “2013”; and our fiscal year ended June 29, 2012 is referred to as “fiscal 2012” or “2012.” We generate revenue by designing, developing, manufacturing and supporting a range of wireless networking products, solutions and services for mobile and fixed communications service providers, private network operators, government agencies, transportation and utility companies, public safety agencies and broadcast system operators across the globe. Our products include point-to-point (PTP) digital microwave transmission systems designed for first/last mile access, middle mile/backhaul, and long distance trunking applications. We also provide network management software solutions to enable operators to deploy, monitor and manage our systems, third party equipment such as antennas, routers, and multiplexers, necessary to build and deploy a wireless transmission network, and a full suite of turnkey support services. We work continuously to improve our established brands and to create new products that meet our customers’ evolving needs and preferences. Our fundamental business goal is to generate superior returns for our stockholders over the long term. We believe that increases in revenue, operating profits and earnings per share are the key measures of financial performance for our business. Our strategic focus in fiscal 2015 will be to continue to accelerate innovation and optimize our product portfolio, improve costs and operational efficiencies, grow our revenue and create a sustainable, profitable business model. To do this, we continue to examine our products, markets, facilities, development programs, and operational flows to ensure we are focused on what we do well and what will differentiate us in the future. We will continue working to streamline management processes to attain the efficiency levels required by the markets in which we do business. Although the general trend of increasing demand for bandwidth to support mobile networks applies in all markets, we expect to see quarter-to-quarter fluctuations within markets and with individual customers based on customers' past purchasing patterns. Seasonality is also a factor that impacts our business. Our fiscal third quarter revenue and orders have historically been lower than the revenue and orders in our second fiscal quarter because many of our customers utilize a significant portion of their capital budgets at the end of their fiscal years, which is typically the calendar year end and coincides with our second fiscal quarter. The majority of our customers begin a new fiscal year on January 1, and capital expenditures tend to be lower in an organization’s first quarter than in its fourth quarter. We anticipate that this seasonality will continue. The seasonality between the second quarter and third quarter may be affected by a variety of additional factors, including changes in the global economy. During fiscal 2015, we expect to provide increased managed services, including network design, inventory management, final configuration and warehousing services, to certain customers in certain geographies. Our operating results may be impacted by providing these services to the extent that we may need to postpone the recognition of revenue and incur upfront and ongoing expenses that are not offset with additional revenue from product sales associated with these services until a future period. Operations Review The market for mobile backhaul continues to be our primary addressable market segment and, over the long term, the demand for increasing the backhaul capacity in our customers' networks continues to grow. In North America we supported long-term evolution ("LTE") deployments of our mobile operator customers, public safety network deployments for state and local governments, and private network implementations for utilities and other customers. Internationally, our business continued to rely on a combination of customers increasing their capacity to handle subscriber growth, the ongoing build-out of some large 3G deployments, and the emergence of early stage LTE deployments. Our position continues to be to support our customers for LTE readiness and ensure that our technology roadmap is well aligned with evolving market requirements. We continue to find that our strength in turnkey and after- sale support services is a differentiating factor that wins business for us and enables us to expand our business with existing customers in all markets. However, as disclosed above and in the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A of this 30 Annual Report on Form 10-K, a number of factors could prevent us from achieving our objectives, including ongoing pricing pressures attributable to competition and macroeconomic conditions in the geographic markets that we service. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, in line with the decrease in revenue that we experienced and our reduced forecast for the immediate future, we announced a new restructuring plan. Our restructuring expenses incurred during fiscal 2014 related to two restructuring plans we initiated in fiscal 2014 (the “Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan”) and fiscal 2013 (the “Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan”). We intend to complete a majority of the remaining restructuring activities under the current plans by the end of second quarter of fiscal 2015. See “Restructuring Charges” below. Revenue We manage our sales activities primarily on a geographic basis in North America and three international geographic regions: (1) Africa and Middle East, (2) Europe and Russia and (3) Latin America and Asia Pacific. Revenue by region for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 and the related changes were shown in the table below: Fiscal Year $ Change % Change (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 142.0 $ 180.5 $ 164.9 $ (38.5) $ Africa and Middle East . . . . . . . Europe and Russia . . . . . . . . . . . Latin America and Asia Pacific . 108.9 36.0 59.1 182.2 48.0 60.6 147.7 53.6 77.8 (73.3) (12.0) (1.5) 15.6 34.5 (21.3)% (40.2)% 9.5 % 23.4 % (5.6) (25.0)% (10.4)% (17.2) (2.5)% (22.1)% Total Revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 346.0 $ 471.3 $ 444.0 $ (125.3) $ 27.3 (26.6)% 6.1 % Our revenue in North America decreased $38.5 million, or 21.3%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. Revenue from wireless operator customers was down as they reach completion of their LTE network building period. We also saw lower revenue from private government and utility networks due to the timing of purchases and project deliveries to those customers. Our revenue in North America increased $15.6 million, or 9.5%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. In fiscal 2013, we saw improved sales to North American mobile operators which were attributable to their ongoing buildout of LTE networks in the region. At the same time, North America sales to non-mobile customers, such as power utilities and state and local government private networks, were flat in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. Our revenue in Africa and Middle East decreased $73.3 million, or 40.2%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The majority of the decrease came from reduced capital spending by our largest customer in the region. Revenue in Europe and Russia declined $12.0 million, or 25.0%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. This decrease was mostly from completion of a large project in fiscal 2013 that was not repeated in fiscal 2014 and from timing of customer purchases in fiscal 2014. Revenue in Latin America and Asia Pacific declined $1.5 million, or 2.5%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The decrease was primarily due to reduced sales in Thailand and Afghanistan. Our revenue in Africa and Middle East increased $34.5 million, or 23.4%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The majority of the increase came in the first half of fiscal 2013 and was attributable to demand from mobile operator customers in Africa investing in network transmission capacity in order to accommodate growth in network data traffic and to increase their service competitiveness. Revenue from mobile operators in Europe and Russia declined $5.6 million, or 10.4%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. We believe the decrease was related to economic difficulties experienced generally throughout Europe. Revenue in Latin America and Asia Pacific declined $17.2 million, or 22.1%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in customer purchases in Asia as some of our larger customers, who were beginning to roll out LTE service, continued to deploy large orders that we delivered in the past year. Our revenue from product sales decreased $114.1 million, or 33.9%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The decrease was primarily due to reduced purchases of our products and services made by larger customers in Africa, North America and Europe compared to the previous year and continued reduction in fiscal 2014. Asia Pacific product sales were also down compared to fiscal 2013, with a small increase in Latin America. Our service revenue decreased $10.7 million, or 7.9%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The main reason for the decline was the reduced revenue in North America owing to the reduction in business with wireless network operators. Other regions had relatively flat service revenue performance between the years. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Overview of Business; Operating Environment and Key Factors Impacting Fiscal 2014 and 2015 Results The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand our results of operations and financial condition. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. In the discussion below, our fiscal year ending July 3, 2015 is referred to as “fiscal 2015” or “2015”; our fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 is referred to as “fiscal 2014” or “2014”; our fiscal year ended June 28, 2013 is referred to as “fiscal 2013” or “2013”; and our fiscal year ended June 29, 2012 is referred to as “fiscal 2012” or “2012.” We generate revenue by designing, developing, manufacturing and supporting a range of wireless networking products, solutions and services for mobile and fixed communications service providers, private network operators, government agencies, transportation and utility companies, public safety agencies and broadcast system operators across the globe. Our products include point-to-point (PTP) digital microwave transmission systems designed for first/last mile access, middle mile/backhaul, and long distance trunking applications. We also provide network management software solutions to enable operators to deploy, monitor and manage our systems, third party equipment such as antennas, routers, and multiplexers, necessary to build and deploy a wireless transmission network, and a full suite of turnkey support services. We work continuously to improve our established brands and to create new products that meet our customers’ evolving needs and preferences. Our fundamental business goal is to generate superior returns for our stockholders over the long term. We believe that increases in revenue, operating profits and earnings per share are the key measures of financial performance for our business. Our strategic focus in fiscal 2015 will be to continue to accelerate innovation and optimize our product portfolio, improve costs and operational efficiencies, grow our revenue and create a sustainable, profitable business model. To do this, we continue to examine our products, markets, facilities, development programs, and operational flows to ensure we are focused on what we do well and what will differentiate us in the future. We will continue working to streamline management processes to attain the efficiency levels required by the markets in which we do business. Although the general trend of increasing demand for bandwidth to support mobile networks applies in all markets, we expect to see quarter-to-quarter fluctuations within markets and with individual customers based on customers' past purchasing patterns. Seasonality is also a factor that impacts our business. Our fiscal third quarter revenue and orders have historically been lower than the revenue and orders in our second fiscal quarter because many of our customers utilize a significant portion of their capital budgets at the end of their fiscal years, which is typically the calendar year end and coincides with our second fiscal quarter. The majority of our customers begin a new fiscal year on January 1, and capital expenditures tend to be lower in an organization’s first quarter than in its fourth quarter. We anticipate that this seasonality will continue. The seasonality between the second quarter and third quarter may be affected by a variety of additional factors, including changes in the global economy. During fiscal 2015, we expect to provide increased managed services, including network design, inventory management, final configuration and warehousing services, to certain customers in certain geographies. Our operating results may be impacted by providing these services to the extent that we may need to postpone the recognition of revenue and incur upfront and ongoing expenses that are not offset with additional revenue from product sales associated with these services until a future period. Operations Review The market for mobile backhaul continues to be our primary addressable market segment and, over the long term, the demand for increasing the backhaul capacity in our customers' networks continues to grow. In North America we supported long-term evolution ("LTE") deployments of our mobile operator customers, public safety network deployments for state and local governments, and private network implementations for utilities and other customers. Internationally, our business continued to rely on a combination of customers increasing their capacity to handle subscriber growth, the ongoing build-out of some large 3G deployments, and the emergence of early stage LTE deployments. Our position continues to be to support our customers for LTE readiness and ensure that our technology roadmap is well aligned with evolving market requirements. We continue to find that our strength in turnkey and after- sale support services is a differentiating factor that wins business for us and enables us to expand our business with existing customers in all markets. However, as disclosed above and in the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A of this A n n u a l R e p o r t Annual Report on Form 10-K, a number of factors could prevent us from achieving our objectives, including ongoing pricing pressures attributable to competition and macroeconomic conditions in the geographic markets that we service. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, in line with the decrease in revenue that we experienced and our reduced forecast for the immediate future, we announced a new restructuring plan. Our restructuring expenses incurred during fiscal 2014 related to two restructuring plans we initiated in fiscal 2014 (the “Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan”) and fiscal 2013 (the “Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan”). We intend to complete a majority of the remaining restructuring activities under the current plans by the end of second quarter of fiscal 2015. See “Restructuring Charges” below. Revenue We manage our sales activities primarily on a geographic basis in North America and three international geographic regions: (1) Africa and Middle East, (2) Europe and Russia and (3) Latin America and Asia Pacific. Revenue by region for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 and the related changes were shown in the table below: Fiscal Year $ Change % Change (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Africa and Middle East . . . . . . . Europe and Russia . . . . . . . . . . . Latin America and Asia Pacific . Total Revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 142.0 $ 180.5 $ 108.9 36.0 59.1 182.2 48.0 60.6 164.9 147.7 53.6 77.8 346.0 $ 471.3 $ 444.0 $ (38.5) $ (73.3) (12.0) (1.5) $ (125.3) $ 15.6 34.5 (5.6) (17.2) 27.3 (21.3)% (40.2)% 9.5 % 23.4 % (25.0)% (10.4)% (2.5)% (22.1)% (26.6)% 6.1 % Our revenue in North America decreased $38.5 million, or 21.3%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. Revenue from wireless operator customers was down as they reach completion of their LTE network building period. We also saw lower revenue from private government and utility networks due to the timing of purchases and project deliveries to those customers. Our revenue in North America increased $15.6 million, or 9.5%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. In fiscal 2013, we saw improved sales to North American mobile operators which were attributable to their ongoing buildout of LTE networks in the region. At the same time, North America sales to non-mobile customers, such as power utilities and state and local government private networks, were flat in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. Our revenue in Africa and Middle East decreased $73.3 million, or 40.2%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The majority of the decrease came from reduced capital spending by our largest customer in the region. Revenue in Europe and Russia declined $12.0 million, or 25.0%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. This decrease was mostly from completion of a large project in fiscal 2013 that was not repeated in fiscal 2014 and from timing of customer purchases in fiscal 2014. Revenue in Latin America and Asia Pacific declined $1.5 million, or 2.5%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The decrease was primarily due to reduced sales in Thailand and Afghanistan. Our revenue in Africa and Middle East increased $34.5 million, or 23.4%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The majority of the increase came in the first half of fiscal 2013 and was attributable to demand from mobile operator customers in Africa investing in network transmission capacity in order to accommodate growth in network data traffic and to increase their service competitiveness. Revenue from mobile operators in Europe and Russia declined $5.6 million, or 10.4%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. We believe the decrease was related to economic difficulties experienced generally throughout Europe. Revenue in Latin America and Asia Pacific declined $17.2 million, or 22.1%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in customer purchases in Asia as some of our larger customers, who were beginning to roll out LTE service, continued to deploy large orders that we delivered in the past year. Our revenue from product sales decreased $114.1 million, or 33.9%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The decrease was primarily due to reduced purchases of our products and services made by larger customers in Africa, North America and Europe compared to the previous year and continued reduction in fiscal 2014. Asia Pacific product sales were also down compared to fiscal 2013, with a small increase in Latin America. Our service revenue decreased $10.7 million, or 7.9%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The main reason for the decline was the reduced revenue in North America owing to the reduction in business with wireless network operators. Other regions had relatively flat service revenue performance between the years. 31 Our revenue from product sales increased $1.2 million, or 0.4%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The increase came primarily from strong sales in Africa, offset in part by reductions in Asia Pacific, Europe and a small year- to-year decrease in North America. Our services revenue increased $26.1 million, or 24.1%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The increase in fiscal 2013 came from additional services delivered in North America, Africa and a small increase in Europe, offset in part by a decrease in Asia Pacific. During fiscal 2014, the MTN Group in Africa accounted for 17% of our total revenue compared with 25% in fiscal 2013 and 17% in fiscal 2012. We have entered into separate and distinct contracts with MTN Group as well as separate arrangements with various MTN Group subsidiaries. For fiscal 2013, revenue from Verizon Wireless accounted for 11% of our total revenue. The loss of all or a substantial portion of MTN Group's business or of Verizon Wireless' business could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. Gross Margin (In millions, except percentages) Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 346.0 260.9 Cost of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.1 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2014 Fiscal Year 2013 $ 471.3 331.2 $ 140.1 $ Change % Change % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.7% 20.3% 22.4% 2012 $ 444.0 312.3 $ 131.7 2014/2013 $(125.3) (70.3) (55.0) 2013/2012 27.3 $ 18.9 8.4 2014/2013 (26.6)% (21.2)% (39.3)% 2013/2012 6.1% 6.1% 6.4% t r o p e R l a u n n A % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Product margin % . . . . . . . . . . . Service margin %. . . . . . . . . . . . 24.6 % 22.4 % 28.5 % 29.7 % 28.8 % 31.9 % 29.7 % 30.4 % 27.4 % Gross margin for fiscal 2014 decreased $55.0 million, or 39.3%, compared with fiscal 2013, primarily due to reduced sales volume. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 5.1 percentage points less in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. Product margin as a percentage of product revenue for fiscal 2014 decreased 6.4 percentage points compared with fiscal 2013. The product margin rate reduction resulted from competitive pricing pressure and from spreading our fixed costs into a smaller volume of product revenue. Service margin as a percentage of service revenue for fiscal 2014 decreased 3.4 percentage points compared with fiscal 2013. Market pricing pressure as well as spreading of our fixed costs over a smaller revenue volume contributed to the decline in service margin rate. Gross margin for fiscal 2013 increased $8.4 million, or 6.4%, compared with fiscal 2012, primarily due to higher sales volume. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue remained approximately the same in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. Product margin as a percentage of product revenue for fiscal 2013 decreased 1.6 percentage points compared with fiscal 2012. The slight reduction resulted from competitive pricing pressures in the international markets, offset in part by a small increase in margin on product sales in North America. Service margin as a percentage of service revenue for fiscal 2013 increased 4.5 percentage points compared with fiscal 2012. Service revenue volume increased substantially in fiscal 2013, which enabled us to spread our fixed costs over a larger base of service business in North America as well as in international markets, resulting in improved service margin rate. Research and Development Expenses Fiscal Year $ Change % Change (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35.5 $ 39.4 $ 36.0 $ (3.9) $ 3.4 (9.9)% 9.4% 10.3% 8.4% 8.1% Our R&D expenses decreased $3.9 million, or 9.9%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. As a percentage of revenue, R&D expenses increased to 10.3% in fiscal 2014 from 8.4% in fiscal 2013. The decrease in R&D expenses of $3.9 million consisted primarily of a $3.8 million decrease of personnel expenses as a result of the restructuring programs we implemented and a $0.7 million decrease in stock based compensation, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in expenses related to our investment in new product development. We continue to invest in new product features, new functionality and lower cost platforms that we believe will enable our product lines to retain their technology leads in a cost effective manner. 32 Our R&D expenses increased $3.4 million, or 9.4%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. As a percentage of revenue, R&D expenses also increased to 8.4% in fiscal 2013 from 8.1% in fiscal 2012. The increase in R&D expenses of $3.4 million consisted primarily of a $2.0 million increase of personnel expenses and a $0.6 million increase in material supplies due to our investment in new product development. In addition, depreciation expenses increased by $0.4 million due to additions of new lab equipment. We continue to invest in new product features, new functionality and lower cost platforms that we believe will enable our product lines to retain their technology leads in a cost effective manner. Selling and Administrative Expenses (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Fiscal Year $ Change % Change Selling and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 88.8 $ 95.5 $ 99.5 $ (6.7) $ (4.0) (7.0)% (4.0)% Our selling and administrative expenses decreased $6.7 million, or 7.0%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The decrease was due primarily to a $2.9 million reduction in personnel expenses as a result of the restructuring programs we implemented, a $1.5 million reduction in bad debt expenses, a $1.9 million decrease in share-based compensation expenses, and a $1.8 million decrease in agent commissions. This was partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in expenses for information technology projects. We will continue to seek ways to improve our operating efficiency in fiscal 2015. Our selling and administrative expenses decreased $4.0 million, or 4.0%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The decrease was due primarily to a $2.1 million reduction in professional services, a $1.2 million reduction in personnel expenses, a $1.4 million reduction in telecommunications expense and a $0.7 million reduction in bad debt expenses, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in share-based compensation expenses and a $0.8 million increase in transactional taxes assessments related to certain international entities. Restructuring Charges During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, in line with the decrease in revenue that we experienced and our reduced forecast for the immediate future, we initiated the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan to reduce our operating costs, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan primarily related to reductions in force and additional downsizing of our Santa Clara, California headquarters. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we initiated the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan that was intended to bring our cost structure in line with the changing business environment of the worldwide microwave radio and telecommunication markets, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan included the downsizing of our Santa Clara, California headquarters and certain international field offices, and reductions in force to reduce our operating expenses. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we initiated a restructuring plan (the “Fiscal 2011 Plan”) to reduce our operational costs primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2011 Plan included the reductions in force to reduce our operating expenses and downsizing or closures of our Morrisville, North Carolina, Santa Clara, California, Montreal, Canada offices and certain international field offices. The Fiscal 2011 Plan has been completed as of the end of fiscal 2013. Our restructuring charges by plan for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 are summarized in the table below: (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Restructuring charges: . . . . . . . . $ 11.1 $ 3.1 $ 2.3 $ 8.0 $ 0.8 258.1 % 34.8 % Fiscal Year $ Change % Change By Plan: Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan . . . . . . Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan . . . . . . Fiscal 2011 Plan. . . . . . . . . . . 5.8 5.3 — — 1.8 1.3 — — 2.3 5.8 3.5 (1.3) — 1.8 N/A 194.4 % N/A N/A (1.0) (100.0)% (43.5)% Our revenue from product sales increased $1.2 million, or 0.4%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The increase came primarily from strong sales in Africa, offset in part by reductions in Asia Pacific, Europe and a small year- to-year decrease in North America. Our services revenue increased $26.1 million, or 24.1%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The increase in fiscal 2013 came from additional services delivered in North America, Africa and a small increase in Europe, offset in part by a decrease in Asia Pacific. During fiscal 2014, the MTN Group in Africa accounted for 17% of our total revenue compared with 25% in fiscal 2013 and 17% in fiscal 2012. We have entered into separate and distinct contracts with MTN Group as well as separate arrangements with various MTN Group subsidiaries. For fiscal 2013, revenue from Verizon Wireless accounted for 11% of our total revenue. The loss of all or a substantial portion of MTN Group's business or of Verizon Wireless' business could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position. Gross Margin Fiscal Year $ Change % Change (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 346.0 $ 471.3 $ 444.0 $(125.3) $ Cost of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260.9 331.2 312.3 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 85.1 $ 140.1 $ 131.7 (70.3) (55.0) 27.3 18.9 8.4 (26.6)% (21.2)% (39.3)% 6.1% 6.1% 6.4% % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Product margin % . . . . . . . . . . . Service margin %. . . . . . . . . . . . 24.6 % 22.4 % 28.5 % 29.7 % 28.8 % 31.9 % 29.7 % 30.4 % 27.4 % Gross margin for fiscal 2014 decreased $55.0 million, or 39.3%, compared with fiscal 2013, primarily due to reduced sales volume. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 5.1 percentage points less in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. Product margin as a percentage of product revenue for fiscal 2014 decreased 6.4 percentage points compared with fiscal 2013. The product margin rate reduction resulted from competitive pricing pressure and from spreading our fixed costs into a smaller volume of product revenue. Service margin as a percentage of service revenue for fiscal 2014 decreased 3.4 percentage points compared with fiscal 2013. Market pricing pressure as well as spreading of our fixed costs over a smaller revenue volume contributed to the decline in service margin rate. Gross margin for fiscal 2013 increased $8.4 million, or 6.4%, compared with fiscal 2012, primarily due to higher sales volume. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue remained approximately the same in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. Product margin as a percentage of product revenue for fiscal 2013 decreased 1.6 percentage points compared with fiscal 2012. The slight reduction resulted from competitive pricing pressures in the international markets, offset in part by a small increase in margin on product sales in North America. Service margin as a percentage of service revenue for fiscal 2013 increased 4.5 percentage points compared with fiscal 2012. Service revenue volume increased substantially in fiscal 2013, which enabled us to spread our fixed costs over a larger base of service business in North America as well as in international markets, resulting in improved service margin rate. Research and Development Expenses (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35.5 $ 39.4 $ 36.0 $ (3.9) $ 3.4 (9.9)% 9.4% Fiscal Year $ Change % Change % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.3% 8.4% 8.1% Our R&D expenses decreased $3.9 million, or 9.9%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. As a percentage of revenue, R&D expenses increased to 10.3% in fiscal 2014 from 8.4% in fiscal 2013. The decrease in R&D expenses of $3.9 million consisted primarily of a $3.8 million decrease of personnel expenses as a result of the restructuring programs we implemented and a $0.7 million decrease in stock based compensation, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in expenses related to our investment in new product development. We continue to invest in new product features, new functionality and lower cost platforms that we believe will enable our product lines to retain their technology leads in a cost effective manner. Our R&D expenses increased $3.4 million, or 9.4%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. As a percentage of revenue, R&D expenses also increased to 8.4% in fiscal 2013 from 8.1% in fiscal 2012. The increase in R&D expenses of $3.4 million consisted primarily of a $2.0 million increase of personnel expenses and a $0.6 million increase in material supplies due to our investment in new product development. In addition, depreciation expenses increased by $0.4 million due to additions of new lab equipment. We continue to invest in new product features, new functionality and lower cost platforms that we believe will enable our product lines to retain their technology leads in a cost effective manner. Selling and Administrative Expenses (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Fiscal Year $ Change % Change Selling and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 88.8 25.7% $ 95.5 20.3% 99.5 22.4% $ (6.7) $ (4.0) (7.0)% (4.0)% Our selling and administrative expenses decreased $6.7 million, or 7.0%, in fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. The decrease was due primarily to a $2.9 million reduction in personnel expenses as a result of the restructuring programs we implemented, a $1.5 million reduction in bad debt expenses, a $1.9 million decrease in share-based compensation expenses, and a $1.8 million decrease in agent commissions. This was partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in expenses for information technology projects. We will continue to seek ways to improve our operating efficiency in fiscal 2015. Our selling and administrative expenses decreased $4.0 million, or 4.0%, in fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012. The decrease was due primarily to a $2.1 million reduction in professional services, a $1.2 million reduction in personnel expenses, a $1.4 million reduction in telecommunications expense and a $0.7 million reduction in bad debt expenses, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in share-based compensation expenses and a $0.8 million increase in transactional taxes assessments related to certain international entities. A n n u a l R e p o r t Restructuring Charges During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, in line with the decrease in revenue that we experienced and our reduced forecast for the immediate future, we initiated the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan to reduce our operating costs, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan primarily related to reductions in force and additional downsizing of our Santa Clara, California headquarters. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we initiated the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan that was intended to bring our cost structure in line with the changing business environment of the worldwide microwave radio and telecommunication markets, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan included the downsizing of our Santa Clara, California headquarters and certain international field offices, and reductions in force to reduce our operating expenses. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we initiated a restructuring plan (the “Fiscal 2011 Plan”) to reduce our operational costs primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2011 Plan included the reductions in force to reduce our operating expenses and downsizing or closures of our Morrisville, North Carolina, Santa Clara, California, Montreal, Canada offices and certain international field offices. The Fiscal 2011 Plan has been completed as of the end of fiscal 2013. Our restructuring charges by plan for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 are summarized in the table below: (In millions, except percentages) Restructuring charges: . . . . . . . . $ By Plan: Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan . . . . . . Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan . . . . . . Fiscal 2011 Plan. . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year $ Change % Change 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 11.1 $ 3.1 $ 2.3 $ 8.0 $ 0.8 258.1 % 34.8 % 5.8 5.3 — — 1.8 1.3 33 — — 2.3 5.8 3.5 (1.3) — 1.8 (1.0) N/A 194.4 % N/A N/A (100.0)% (43.5)% t r o p e R l a u n n A Our restructuring expenses consisted primarily of severance and related benefit charges and facilities costs related to obligations under non-cancelable leases for facilities that we ceased to use. Restructuring charges for fiscal 2014 included a $4.7 million facilities charge primarily related to ceasing to use a portion of our Santa Clara headquarters building and a $6.4 million employee termination charge primarily related to our Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan. Restructuring charges for fiscal 2013 included a $3.0 million employee termination charge primarily related to our Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan and Fiscal 2011 Plan. Restructuring charges for fiscal 2012 included a $0.9 million employee termination charge and a $1.4 million facilities charge associated with the sublease and relocation of our Morrisville, North Carolina facility under our Fiscal 2011 Plan. We have substantially completed our activities under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan and intend to complete a majority of the remaining restructuring activities under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2015. Other Income, Interest Income and Interest Expense (In millions) Other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 — $ 0.5 (0.4) $ 0.7 0.8 (0.8) — 0.6 (1.3) We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and recording the related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations (In millions) Fiscal Year $ Change 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . $ 0.9 $ (4.1) $ (8.6) $ 5.0 $ 4.5 Our discontinued operations consist of the WiMAX business, which was sold to EION Networks, Inc. (“EION”) on September 2, 2011. We completed the business transition with EION in fiscal 2012. The income incurred in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to recovery of certain WiMAX customer receivables that was previously written down. The loss incurred in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to $4.2 million write-downs of certain WiMAX deferred cost of sales that were not transferred to EION and certain expenses we incurred to support a remaining customer obligation. The loss was partially offset by a $0.3 million write down of our payable to EION related to customer receivables and $0.1 million contingent payments we received from EION. The loss in fiscal 2012 included operating expenses we incurred to transition the business and a $1.9 million loss on disposition of the WiMAX business. Other income of $0.7 million for fiscal 2013 reflected a nonrecurring benefit related to a customer contract. Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Strategies Interest income reflected interest earned on our cash equivalents which were comprised of money market funds Sources of Cash and certificates of deposit. Interest expense was primarily related to interest associated with borrowings, term loans and letters of credit under the SVB Credit Facility. In fiscal 2012, interest expense also included preference dividends on our $8.25 million redeemable preference shares. The $8.25 million preference shares were redeemed at their carrying value on January 30, 2012, funded by a two-year term loan of $8.25 million under our credit facility at a fixed interest rate of 5% per annum. Income Taxes (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (50.6) Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 As % of income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3.0)% $ 2.4 13.3 $ (14.0) $ 1.5 (53.0) $ (11.8) 16.4 11.8 554.2% (10.7)% Fiscal Year $ Change The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 was $1.5 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax expense at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax loss of $50.6 million was primarily attributable to losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit and increase in foreign withholding taxes. The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal 2013 was $13.3 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax benefit at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax income of $2.4 million was primarily attributable to a $11.7 million increase in our reserves for uncertain tax positions, losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit and increase in foreign withholding taxes. The increase in our unrecognized tax benefits was the result of additional information obtained during recent tax examinations in certain countries. The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal 2012 was $1.5 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax benefit at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax loss of $14.0 million was primarily attributable to losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit. The tax expense for fiscal 2012 of $1.5 million was primarily attributable to profitable foreign entities for which we have accrued income taxes. 34 As of June 27, 2014, our total cash and cash equivalents were $48.8 million. Approximately $8.2 million, or 16.8%, was held by entities domiciled in the United States. The remaining balance of $40.6 million, or 83.2%, was held by entities outside the United States. Of the amount of cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries at June 27, 2014, $30.1 million was held in jurisdictions where our undistributed earnings are indefinitely reinvested, and if repatriated, would be subject to U.S. taxes which are currently nominal. As of June 27, 2014, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of the $48.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, $19.7 million of available credit under our $40.0 million credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”), and future collections of receivables from customers. We regularly require letters of credit from some customers and, from time to time, these letters of credit are discounted without recourse shortly after shipment occurs in order to meet immediate liquidity requirements and to reduce our credit and sovereign risk. Historically our primary sources of liquidity have been cash flows from operations, credit facilities and cash proceeds from sale of our equity securities. During fiscal 2014, our total cash and cash equivalents decreased by $41.2 million primarily due to $29.3 million of cash used in operating activities, $9.4 million of cash used for capital expenditures and $2.8 million repayments on our debt. Cash used in operating activities was $29.3 million in fiscal 2014, primarily due to our net loss of $51.2 million adjusted by non-cash expense items of $18.8 million, decreases in reserve for uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes of $14.9 million and in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $9.1 million, and an increase in inventories of $7.0 million, partially offset by decreases in accounts receivables of $8.2 million, in unbilled costs of $5.1 million and in net prepaid income taxes of $2.7 million, and increases in customer advance payments and unearned income of $14.6 million and in accrued restructuring liabilities of $2.5 million. The decrease in the reserve for uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes was primarily due a $13.2 million tax payment made to a jurisdiction during the second quarter of fiscal 2014. The decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses were primarily due to the timing of payments to our contract manufacturers and suppliers as well as the payout of employee bonuses. The decrease in unbilled costs was due to the timing of billing of projects. The increase in inventories was due to the timing of customer shipments. The decrease in accounts receivable was due to collections during fiscal 2014 exceeding billings. The decrease in net prepaid income taxes was due to a tax refund that we received from a tax jurisdiction during the period. The increase in customer advance payments and unearned income was due to the timing of revenue recognition on several large contracts. The increase in restructuring liabilities was primarily related to severance related expenses we accrued under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan and the facility exit cost liability we incurred associated with our Santa Clara headquarters building under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan. We used $8.6 million in cash during fiscal 2014 on expenses related to restructuring liabilities. For fiscal 2015, we expect to spend approximately $6.3 million for capital expenditures, primarily on equipment for development and manufacturing of new products and to support customer managed services. Our restructuring expenses consisted primarily of severance and related benefit charges and facilities costs related We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in to obligations under non-cancelable leases for facilities that we ceased to use. Restructuring charges for fiscal 2014 included a $4.7 million facilities charge primarily related to ceasing to use a portion of our Santa Clara headquarters building and a $6.4 million employee termination charge primarily related to our Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan. Restructuring charges for fiscal 2013 included a $3.0 million employee termination charge primarily related to our Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan and Fiscal 2011 Plan. Restructuring charges for fiscal 2012 included a $0.9 million employee termination charge and a $1.4 million facilities charge associated with the sublease and relocation of our Morrisville, North Carolina facility under our Fiscal 2011 Plan. We have substantially completed our activities under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan and intend to complete a majority of the remaining restructuring activities under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2015. Other Income, Interest Income and Interest Expense (In millions) Other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.5 (0.4) $ 0.7 0.8 (0.8) — 0.6 (1.3) Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and recording the related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations (In millions) Fiscal Year $ Change 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . $ 0.9 $ (4.1) $ (8.6) $ 5.0 $ 4.5 Our discontinued operations consist of the WiMAX business, which was sold to EION Networks, Inc. (“EION”) on September 2, 2011. We completed the business transition with EION in fiscal 2012. The income incurred in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to recovery of certain WiMAX customer receivables that was previously written down. The loss incurred in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to $4.2 million write-downs of certain WiMAX deferred cost of sales that were not transferred to EION and certain expenses we incurred to support a remaining customer obligation. The loss was partially offset by a $0.3 million write down of our payable to EION related to customer receivables and $0.1 million contingent payments we received from EION. The loss in fiscal 2012 included operating expenses we incurred to transition the business and a $1.9 million loss on disposition of the WiMAX business. Other income of $0.7 million for fiscal 2013 reflected a nonrecurring benefit related to a customer contract. Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Strategies Interest income reflected interest earned on our cash equivalents which were comprised of money market funds Sources of Cash and certificates of deposit. Interest expense was primarily related to interest associated with borrowings, term loans and letters of credit under the SVB Credit Facility. In fiscal 2012, interest expense also included preference dividends on our $8.25 million redeemable preference shares. The $8.25 million preference shares were redeemed at their carrying value on January 30, 2012, funded by a two-year term loan of $8.25 million under our credit facility at a fixed interest rate of 5% per annum. Income Taxes (In millions, except percentages) 2014 2013 2012 2014/2013 2013/2012 Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (50.6) $ $ (14.0) $ (53.0) $ Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 1.5 (11.8) 2.4 13.3 16.4 11.8 As % of income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3.0)% 554.2% (10.7)% Fiscal Year $ Change The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 was $1.5 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax expense at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax loss of $50.6 million was primarily attributable to losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit and increase in foreign withholding taxes. The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal 2013 was $13.3 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax benefit at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax income of $2.4 million was primarily attributable to a $11.7 million increase in our reserves for uncertain tax positions, losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit and increase in foreign withholding taxes. The increase in our unrecognized tax benefits was the result of additional information obtained during recent tax examinations in certain countries. The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal 2012 was $1.5 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax benefit at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax loss of $14.0 million was primarily attributable to losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit. The tax expense for fiscal 2012 of $1.5 million was primarily attributable to profitable foreign entities for which we have accrued income taxes. As of June 27, 2014, our total cash and cash equivalents were $48.8 million. Approximately $8.2 million, or 16.8%, was held by entities domiciled in the United States. The remaining balance of $40.6 million, or 83.2%, was held by entities outside the United States. Of the amount of cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries at June 27, 2014, $30.1 million was held in jurisdictions where our undistributed earnings are indefinitely reinvested, and if repatriated, would be subject to U.S. taxes which are currently nominal. As of June 27, 2014, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of the $48.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, $19.7 million of available credit under our $40.0 million credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”), and future collections of receivables from customers. We regularly require letters of credit from some customers and, from time to time, these letters of credit are discounted without recourse shortly after shipment occurs in order to meet immediate liquidity requirements and to reduce our credit and sovereign risk. Historically our primary sources of liquidity have been cash flows from operations, credit facilities and cash proceeds from sale of our equity securities. During fiscal 2014, our total cash and cash equivalents decreased by $41.2 million primarily due to $29.3 million of cash used in operating activities, $9.4 million of cash used for capital expenditures and $2.8 million repayments on our debt. Cash used in operating activities was $29.3 million in fiscal 2014, primarily due to our net loss of $51.2 million adjusted by non-cash expense items of $18.8 million, decreases in reserve for uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes of $14.9 million and in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $9.1 million, and an increase in inventories of $7.0 million, partially offset by decreases in accounts receivables of $8.2 million, in unbilled costs of $5.1 million and in net prepaid income taxes of $2.7 million, and increases in customer advance payments and unearned income of $14.6 million and in accrued restructuring liabilities of $2.5 million. The decrease in the reserve for uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes was primarily due a $13.2 million tax payment made to a jurisdiction during the second quarter of fiscal 2014. The decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses were primarily due to the timing of payments to our contract manufacturers and suppliers as well as the payout of employee bonuses. The decrease in unbilled costs was due to the timing of billing of projects. The increase in inventories was due to the timing of customer shipments. The decrease in accounts receivable was due to collections during fiscal 2014 exceeding billings. The decrease in net prepaid income taxes was due to a tax refund that we received from a tax jurisdiction during the period. The increase in customer advance payments and unearned income was due to the timing of revenue recognition on several large contracts. The increase in restructuring liabilities was primarily related to severance related expenses we accrued under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan and the facility exit cost liability we incurred associated with our Santa Clara headquarters building under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan. We used $8.6 million in cash during fiscal 2014 on expenses related to restructuring liabilities. For fiscal 2015, we expect to spend approximately $6.3 million for capital expenditures, primarily on equipment for development and manufacturing of new products and to support customer managed services. 35 A n n u a l R e p o r t We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, the available line of credit under the SVB Credit Facility Restructuring Payments t r o p e R l a u n n A and future cash collections from customers will be sufficient to provide for our anticipated requirements for working capital and capital expenditures for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future. There can be no assurance, however, that our business will generate cash flow, we will be in compliance with the quarterly financial covenants contained in the SVB Credit Facility, or that anticipated operational improvements will be achieved. If we are not in compliance with the financial covenants, the availability of our credit facility is not certain or may be diminished. If we are unable to maintain cash balances or generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our obligations that may arise in the future, we may be required to sell assets, reduce capital expenditures, or obtain financing. If we need to obtain additional financing, we cannot be assured that it will be available on favorable terms, or at all. Our ability to make scheduled principal payments or pay interest on or refinance any future indebtedness depends on our future performance and financial results, which, to a certain extent, are subject to general conditions in or affecting the microwave communications market and to general economic, political, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors beyond our control. Available Credit Facility, Borrowings and Repayment of Debt On March 28, 2014, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with SVB (the “SVB Credit Facility"). This agreement amends and restates our existing First Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, which was entered into on September 27, 2013 and amended on October 29, 2013, November 20, 2013 and February 10, 2014, respectively, providing for certain amendments to the maximum borrowing limit and financial covenants. On September 27, 2013, we repaid the remaining $1.7 million outstanding balance of the original $8.3 million two-year term loan that we borrowed on January 30, 2012. As of June 27, 2014, our outstanding debt under the SVB Credit Facility consisted of the $6.0 million borrowings that we advanced under a previous SVB credit facility in fiscal 2011. The SVB Credit Facility provides for a committed amount of up to $40.0 million, decreased from the $50.0 million credit limit under the first amended and restated credit facility, with a $30.0 million sublimit that can be borrowed by our Singapore subsidiary. Borrowings may be advanced under the SVB Credit Facility at the lesser of $40.0 million or a borrowing base equal to a specified percentage of the value of eligible accounts receivable and U.S. unbilled accounts of the Company, subject to certain reserves and eligibility criteria. The SVB Credit Facility can also be utilized to issue letters of credit. Principal, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, is due and payable on September 26, 2016. We may prepay loans under the SVB Credit Facility in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. As of June 27, 2014, available credit under the SVB Credit Facility was $19.7 million reflecting the calculated borrowing base of $31.4 million less existing borrowings of $6.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $5.7 million. Borrowings under the SVB Credit Facility carry an interest rate computed at the daily prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal plus a spread of 0.50% to 1.50%, with such spread determined based on our adjusted quick ratio. If a minimum adjusted quick ratio requirement is satisfied, LIBOR advances are offered at LIBOR plus a spread of 2.75%. Interest is due and payable in arrears monthly for prime rate loans and, for LIBOR rate loans, at the end of an interest period or at each 3-month interval if the interest period is greater than three months. During fiscal 2014, the weighted average interest rate on our $6.0 million loan was 3.38%. The previous $8.3 million two-year term loan bore a fixed interest rate of 5% per annum. The SVB Credit Facility contains quarterly financial covenants including minimum adjusted quick ratio and minimum profitability (EBITDA) requirements. In the event our adjusted quick ratio falls below a certain level, cash received in our accounts with SVB may be directly applied to reduce outstanding obligations under the credit facility. The SVB Credit Facility also imposes certain restrictions on our ability to dispose of assets, permit a change in control, merge or consolidate, make acquisitions, incur indebtedness, grant liens, make investments, make certain restricted payments and enter into transactions with affiliates under certain circumstances. Certain of our assets, including accounts receivable, inventory, and equipment, are pledged as collateral for the SVB Credit Facility. Upon an event of default, outstanding obligations would be immediately due and payable. Under certain circumstances, a default interest rate will apply on all obligations during the existence of an event of default at a per annum rate of interest equal to 2.00% above the applicable interest rate. As of June 27, 2014, we were in compliance with the quarterly financial covenants contained in the SVB Credit Facility. However, as a result of the uncertainty on our ability to meet the financial covenants and the fact that the SVB Credit Facility contains subjective acceleration clauses that could be triggered by the lender, the $6.0 million borrowing was classified as a current liability as of June 27, 2014. 36 We have a liability for restructuring activities totaling $5.2 million as of June 27, 2014, of which $2.8 million is classified as current liability and expected to be paid out in cash over the next year. We expect to fund these future payments with available cash and cash flow provided by operations. Contractual Obligations As of June 27, 2014, cash payments due under our contractual obligations were estimated as follows: Obligations Due by Fiscal Year (In millions) Total 2015 2016-2017 2018-2019 After 2019 Other Borrowings under credit facility . . . . . . $ 6.0 $ 6.0 $ — $ — $ — $ Purchase obligations(1)(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating lease commitments(3). . . . . . . Capital lease commitments . . . . . . . . . . Reserve for uncertain tax positions(2). . . 48.3 20.2 0.1 1.0 48.3 5.0 0.1 — — 7.0 — — — 5.8 — — — 2.4 — — Total contractual cash obligations . . . $ 75.6 $ 59.4 $ 7.0 $ 5.8 $ 2.4 $ — — — — 1.0 1.0 ___________________________ (1) From time to time in the normal course of business we may enter into purchasing agreements with our suppliers that require us to accept delivery of, and remit full payment for, finished products that we have ordered, finished products that we requested be held as safety stock, and work in process started on our behalf in the event we cancel or terminate the purchasing agreement. Because these agreements do not specify fixed or minimum quantities, do not specify minimum or variable price provisions, and do not specify the approximate timing of the transaction, and we have no present intention to cancel or terminate any of these agreements, we currently do not believe that we have any future liability under these agreements. (2) Liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $1.0 million were included in long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments related to this amount due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes. (3) These items are not recorded on our balance sheet. Commercial Commitments We have entered into commercial commitments in the normal course of business including surety bonds, standby letters of credit and other arrangements with financial institutions and insurers primarily relating to the guarantee of future performance on certain tenders and contracts to provide products and services to customers. As of June 27, 2014, we had commercial commitments on outstanding surety bonds and standby letters of credit as follows: Payment guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ — $ (In millions) Standby letters of credit used for: Performance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Surety bonds used for: Bids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax and payment guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Performance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expiration of Commitments by Fiscal Year Total 2015 2016 2017 After 2017 1.0 5.2 6.2 0.1 4.8 34.7 39.6 45.8 0.2 4.1 4.3 0.1 4.8 34.7 39.6 43.9 0.6 1.0 1.6 — — — — 0.1 0.1 — — — — 0.2 — 0.2 — — — — 0.2 Total commercial commitments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ 1.6 $ 0.1 $ and future cash collections from customers will be sufficient to provide for our anticipated requirements for working capital and capital expenditures for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future. There can be no assurance, however, that our business will generate cash flow, we will be in compliance with the quarterly financial covenants contained in the SVB Credit Facility, or that anticipated operational improvements will be achieved. If we are not in compliance with the financial covenants, the availability of our credit facility is not certain or may be diminished. If we are unable to maintain cash balances or generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our obligations that may arise in the future, we may be required to sell assets, reduce capital expenditures, or obtain financing. If we need to obtain additional financing, we cannot be assured that it will be available on favorable terms, or at all. Our ability to make scheduled principal payments or pay interest on or refinance any future indebtedness depends on our future performance and financial results, which, to a certain extent, are subject to general conditions in or affecting the microwave communications market and to general economic, political, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors beyond our control. Available Credit Facility, Borrowings and Repayment of Debt On March 28, 2014, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with SVB (the “SVB Credit Facility"). This agreement amends and restates our existing First Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, which was entered into on September 27, 2013 and amended on October 29, 2013, November 20, 2013 and February 10, 2014, respectively, providing for certain amendments to the maximum borrowing limit and financial covenants. On September 27, 2013, we repaid the remaining $1.7 million outstanding balance of the original $8.3 million two-year term loan that we borrowed on January 30, 2012. As of June 27, 2014, our outstanding debt under the SVB Credit Facility consisted of the $6.0 million borrowings that we advanced under a previous SVB credit facility in fiscal 2011. The SVB Credit Facility provides for a committed amount of up to $40.0 million, decreased from the $50.0 million credit limit under the first amended and restated credit facility, with a $30.0 million sublimit that can be borrowed by our Singapore subsidiary. Borrowings may be advanced under the SVB Credit Facility at the lesser of $40.0 million or a borrowing base equal to a specified percentage of the value of eligible accounts receivable and U.S. unbilled accounts of the Company, subject to certain reserves and eligibility criteria. The SVB Credit Facility can also be utilized to issue letters of credit. Principal, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, is due and payable on September 26, 2016. We may prepay loans under the SVB Credit Facility in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. As of June 27, 2014, available credit under the SVB Credit Facility was $19.7 million reflecting the calculated borrowing base of $31.4 million less existing borrowings of $6.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $5.7 million. If a minimum adjusted quick ratio requirement is satisfied, LIBOR advances are offered at LIBOR plus a spread of 2.75%. Interest is due and payable in arrears monthly for prime rate loans and, for LIBOR rate loans, at the end of an interest period or at each 3-month interval if the interest period is greater than three months. During fiscal 2014, the weighted average interest rate on our $6.0 million loan was 3.38%. The previous $8.3 million two-year term loan bore a fixed interest rate of 5% per annum. The SVB Credit Facility contains quarterly financial covenants including minimum adjusted quick ratio and minimum profitability (EBITDA) requirements. In the event our adjusted quick ratio falls below a certain level, cash received in our accounts with SVB may be directly applied to reduce outstanding obligations under the credit facility. The SVB Credit Facility also imposes certain restrictions on our ability to dispose of assets, permit a change in control, merge or consolidate, make acquisitions, incur indebtedness, grant liens, make investments, make certain restricted payments and enter into transactions with affiliates under certain circumstances. Certain of our assets, including accounts receivable, inventory, and equipment, are pledged as collateral for the SVB Credit Facility. Upon an event of default, outstanding obligations would be immediately due and payable. Under certain circumstances, a default interest rate will apply on all obligations during the existence of an event of default at a per annum rate of interest equal to 2.00% above the applicable interest rate. As of June 27, 2014, we were in compliance with the quarterly financial covenants contained in the SVB Credit Facility. However, as a result of the uncertainty on our ability to meet the financial covenants and the fact that the SVB Credit Facility contains subjective acceleration clauses that could be triggered by the lender, the $6.0 million borrowing was classified as a current liability as of June 27, 2014. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, the available line of credit under the SVB Credit Facility Restructuring Payments We have a liability for restructuring activities totaling $5.2 million as of June 27, 2014, of which $2.8 million is classified as current liability and expected to be paid out in cash over the next year. We expect to fund these future payments with available cash and cash flow provided by operations. Contractual Obligations As of June 27, 2014, cash payments due under our contractual obligations were estimated as follows: (In millions) Total 2015 2016-2017 2018-2019 After 2019 Other Obligations Due by Fiscal Year Borrowings under credit facility . . . . . . $ Purchase obligations(1)(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating lease commitments(3). . . . . . . Capital lease commitments . . . . . . . . . . Reserve for uncertain tax positions(2). . . Total contractual cash obligations . . . $ ___________________________ 6.0 $ 6.0 $ — $ — $ — $ 48.3 20.2 0.1 1.0 48.3 5.0 0.1 — — 7.0 — — — 5.8 — — — 2.4 — — 75.6 $ 59.4 $ 7.0 $ 5.8 $ 2.4 $ — — — — 1.0 1.0 (1) From time to time in the normal course of business we may enter into purchasing agreements with our suppliers that require us to accept delivery of, and remit full payment for, finished products that we have ordered, finished products that we requested be held as safety stock, and work in process started on our behalf in the event we cancel or terminate the purchasing agreement. Because these agreements do not specify fixed or minimum quantities, do not specify minimum or variable price provisions, and do not specify the approximate timing of the transaction, and we have no present intention to cancel or terminate any of these agreements, we currently do not believe that we have any future liability under these agreements. (2) Liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $1.0 million were included in long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments related to this amount due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes. (3) These items are not recorded on our balance sheet. A n n u a l R e p o r t Borrowings under the SVB Credit Facility carry an interest rate computed at the daily prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal plus a spread of 0.50% to 1.50%, with such spread determined based on our adjusted quick ratio. Commercial Commitments We have entered into commercial commitments in the normal course of business including surety bonds, standby letters of credit and other arrangements with financial institutions and insurers primarily relating to the guarantee of future performance on certain tenders and contracts to provide products and services to customers. As of June 27, 2014, we had commercial commitments on outstanding surety bonds and standby letters of credit as follows: (In millions) Standby letters of credit used for: Payment guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Performance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Surety bonds used for: Bids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax and payment guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Performance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total commercial commitments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Expiration of Commitments by Fiscal Year Total 2015 2016 2017 After 2017 1.0 5.2 6.2 0.1 4.8 34.7 39.6 45.8 $ $ 0.2 4.1 4.3 0.1 4.8 34.7 39.6 43.9 $ $ 0.6 1.0 1.6 — — — — 1.6 $ $ — $ 0.1 0.1 — — — — 0.1 $ 0.2 — 0.2 — — — — 0.2 37 As we have not historically had to pay out on any of our performance guarantees, the outstanding commercial commitments have not been recorded in our consolidated balance sheet. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Currency In accordance with the definition under SEC rules (Item 303(a) (4) (ii) of Regulation S-K), any of the following qualify as off-balance sheet arrangements: • • • • any obligation under certain guarantee contracts; a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets; any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under certain derivative instruments; and any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a material variable interest held by the registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with the registrant. Currently we are not participating in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, including variable interest entities, and we do not have any material retained or contingent interest in assets as defined above. As of June 27, 2014, we did not have material financial guarantees or other contractual commitments that are reasonably likely to adversely affect liquidity. In addition, we are not currently a party to any related party transactions that materially affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Due to the downsizing of certain of our operations pursuant to divestitures, restructuring plans or otherwise, some properties leased by us have been sublet to third parties. In the event any of these third parties vacate any of these premises, we would be legally obligated under master lease arrangements. We believe that the financial risk of default by such sublessors is not likely to be individually or in the aggregate material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. t r o p e R l a u n n A Financial Risk Management In the normal course of doing business, we are exposed to the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates. We employ established policies and procedures governing the use of financial instruments to manage our exposure to such risks. Exchange Rate Risk We conduct business globally in numerous currencies and are therefore exposed to foreign currency risks. We use derivative instruments to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We do not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes or make speculative investments in foreign currencies. We use foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge forecasted foreign currency transactions relating to forecasted sales and purchase transactions. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges and are carried at fair value. The effective portion of the gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified into the income or expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. We also enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate the change in fair value of specific non-functional currency assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. All balance sheet hedges are marked to market through earnings every period. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are largely offset by re-measurement of the underlying assets and liabilities. As of June 27, 2014, we had foreign currency forward contracts outstanding with a total notional amount of $21.1 million consisting of 11 different currencies. The following is a summary of the gross notional amount of our outstanding contracts grouped by the underlying foreign currency as of June 27, 2014: 38 Notional Contract Amount (Local Currency) Notional Contract Amount (USD) (In millions) $ Australian dollar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canadian dollar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Euro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Indian rupee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Philippine peso . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Polish zloty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Republic of South Africa rand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other currencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.4 1.6 6.8 204.8 127.3 3.4 14 N/A 0.3 1.5 9.2 3.4 2.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 Total of all currency forward contracts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21.1 Net foreign exchange loss recorded in our consolidated statements of operations during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 totaled $0.8 million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively. A 10% adverse change in currency exchange rates for our foreign currency derivatives held as of June 27, 2014 would have an impact of approximately $2.1 million on the fair value of such instruments. This quantification of exposure to the market risk associated with foreign exchange financial instruments does not take into account the offsetting impact of changes in the fair value of our foreign denominated assets, liabilities and firm commitments. Certain of our international business was transacted in non-U.S. dollar currency. As discussed above, we utilize foreign currency hedging instruments to minimize the currency risk of international transactions. The impact of translating the assets and liabilities of foreign operations to U.S. dollars is included as a component of stockholders’ equity. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, the cumulative translation adjustment decreased our stockholders’ equity by $2.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash equivalents and borrowings Interest Rate Risk under our credit facility. Exposure on Cash Equivalents We had $48.8 million in total cash and cash equivalents as of June 27, 2014. Cash equivalents totaled $13.7 million as of June 27, 2014 and were comprised of money market funds and certificates of deposit. Cash equivalents have been recorded at fair value on our balance sheet. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our short-term investment portfolio. We invest in high-credit quality issues and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer and country. The portfolio includes only marketable securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity. The portfolio is also diversified by maturity to ensure that funds are readily available as needed to meet our liquidity needs. This policy reduces the potential need to sell securities in order to meet liquidity needs and therefore the potential effect of changing market rates on the value of securities sold. The primary objective of our short-term investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing yields, without significantly increasing risk. Our cash equivalents earn interest at fixed rates; therefore, changes in interest rates will not generate a gain or loss on these investments unless they are sold prior to maturity. Actual gains and losses due to the sale of our investments prior to maturity have been immaterial. The weighted average days to maturity for cash equivalents held as of June 27, 2014 was three days, and these investments had an average yield of 0.17% per annum. A 10% change in interest rates on our cash and cash equivalents is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Exposure on Borrowings During fiscal 2014, we had $6.0 million of demand borrowings outstanding under our credit facility that incurred interest at the prime rate or prime rate plus a spread of 0.50% to 1.50%. We also recorded interest on our $8.3 million borrowing drawn on January 30, 2012 and paid off on September 27, 2013 at the fixed rate of 5% per annum. During As we have not historically had to pay out on any of our performance guarantees, the outstanding commercial commitments have not been recorded in our consolidated balance sheet. In accordance with the definition under SEC rules (Item 303(a) (4) (ii) of Regulation S-K), any of the following Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements qualify as off-balance sheet arrangements: any obligation under certain guarantee contracts; • • • • a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets; any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under certain derivative instruments; and any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a material variable interest held by the registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with the registrant. Currently we are not participating in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, including variable interest entities, and we do not have any material retained or contingent interest in assets as defined above. As of June 27, 2014, we did not have material financial guarantees or other contractual commitments that are reasonably likely to adversely affect liquidity. In addition, we are not currently a party to any related party transactions that materially affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Due to the downsizing of certain of our operations pursuant to divestitures, restructuring plans or otherwise, some properties leased by us have been sublet to third parties. In the event any of these third parties vacate any of these premises, we would be legally obligated under master lease arrangements. We believe that the financial risk of default by such sublessors is not likely to be individually or in the aggregate material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Financial Risk Management Exchange Rate Risk currencies. In the normal course of doing business, we are exposed to the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates. We employ established policies and procedures governing the use of financial instruments to manage our exposure to such risks. We conduct business globally in numerous currencies and are therefore exposed to foreign currency risks. We use derivative instruments to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We do not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes or make speculative investments in foreign We use foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge forecasted foreign currency transactions relating to forecasted sales and purchase transactions. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges and are carried at fair value. The effective portion of the gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified into the income or expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. We also enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate the change in fair value of specific non-functional currency assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. All balance sheet hedges are marked to market through earnings every period. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are largely offset by re-measurement of the underlying assets and liabilities. As of June 27, 2014, we had foreign currency forward contracts outstanding with a total notional amount of $21.1 million consisting of 11 different currencies. The following is a summary of the gross notional amount of our outstanding contracts grouped by the underlying foreign currency as of June 27, 2014: Currency Australian dollar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canadian dollar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Euro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Indian rupee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Philippine peso . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Polish zloty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Republic of South Africa rand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other currencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total of all currency forward contracts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notional Contract Amount (Local Currency) Notional Contract Amount (USD) (In millions) $ 0.4 1.6 6.8 204.8 127.3 3.4 14 N/A $ 0.3 1.5 9.2 3.4 2.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 21.1 Net foreign exchange loss recorded in our consolidated statements of operations during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 totaled $0.8 million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively. A 10% adverse change in currency exchange rates for our foreign currency derivatives held as of June 27, 2014 would have an impact of approximately $2.1 million on the fair value of such instruments. This quantification of exposure to the market risk associated with foreign exchange financial instruments does not take into account the offsetting impact of changes in the fair value of our foreign denominated assets, liabilities and firm commitments. Certain of our international business was transacted in non-U.S. dollar currency. As discussed above, we utilize foreign currency hedging instruments to minimize the currency risk of international transactions. The impact of translating the assets and liabilities of foreign operations to U.S. dollars is included as a component of stockholders’ equity. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, the cumulative translation adjustment decreased our stockholders’ equity by $2.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. A n n u a l R e p o r t Interest Rate Risk Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash equivalents and borrowings under our credit facility. Exposure on Cash Equivalents We had $48.8 million in total cash and cash equivalents as of June 27, 2014. Cash equivalents totaled $13.7 million as of June 27, 2014 and were comprised of money market funds and certificates of deposit. Cash equivalents have been recorded at fair value on our balance sheet. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our short-term investment portfolio. We invest in high-credit quality issues and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer and country. The portfolio includes only marketable securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity. The portfolio is also diversified by maturity to ensure that funds are readily available as needed to meet our liquidity needs. This policy reduces the potential need to sell securities in order to meet liquidity needs and therefore the potential effect of changing market rates on the value of securities sold. The primary objective of our short-term investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing yields, without significantly increasing risk. Our cash equivalents earn interest at fixed rates; therefore, changes in interest rates will not generate a gain or loss on these investments unless they are sold prior to maturity. Actual gains and losses due to the sale of our investments prior to maturity have been immaterial. The weighted average days to maturity for cash equivalents held as of June 27, 2014 was three days, and these investments had an average yield of 0.17% per annum. A 10% change in interest rates on our cash and cash equivalents is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Exposure on Borrowings During fiscal 2014, we had $6.0 million of demand borrowings outstanding under our credit facility that incurred interest at the prime rate or prime rate plus a spread of 0.50% to 1.50%. We also recorded interest on our $8.3 million borrowing drawn on January 30, 2012 and paid off on September 27, 2013 at the fixed rate of 5% per annum. During 39 t r o p e R l a u n n A fiscal 2014, our weighted average interest rate was 3.5% and we recorded total interest expense of $0.2 million on these borrowings. A 10% change in interest rates on the current borrowings or on future borrowings is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows since interest on our borrowings is not material to our overall financial position. Critical Accounting Estimates Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following: • • • • revenue recognition; inventory valuation and provision for excess and obsolete inventory losses; impairment of long-lived assets; and income taxes and tax valuation allowances. In some cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result. Our senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The following is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies or estimates. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in “Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the notes to consolidated financial statements. In preparing our financial statements and accounting for the underlying transactions and balances, we apply those accounting policies. We consider the estimates discussed below as critical to an understanding of our financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on our judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Besides estimates that meet the “critical” accounting estimate criteria, we make many other accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. All estimates, whether or not deemed critical, affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are based on experience and other information available prior to the issuance of the financial statements. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known, including for estimates that we do not deem “critical.” Revenue Recognition We generate substantially all of our revenue from the sales or licensing of our microwave radio and wireless access systems, network management software, and professional services including installation and commissioning and training. Principal customers for our products and services include domestic and international wireless/mobile service providers, original equipment manufacturers, distributors, system integrators, as well as private network users such as public safety agencies, government institutions, and utility, pipeline, railroad and other industrial enterprises that operate broadband wireless networks. Our customers generally purchase a combination of our products and services as part of a multiple element arrangement. Our assessment of which revenue recognition guidance is appropriate to account for each element in an arrangement can involve significant judgment. This assessment has a significant impact on the amount and timing of revenue recognition. 40 Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria have been met: • Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. Contracts and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. • Delivery has occurred. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. • The fee is fixed or determinable. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. • Collectability is reasonably assured. We assess collectability based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history. We often enter into multiple contractual agreements with the same customer. Such agreements are reviewed to determine whether they should be evaluated as one arrangement. If an arrangement, other than a long-term contract, requires the delivery or performance of multiple deliverables or elements, we determine whether the individual elements represent “separate units of accounting”. The determination as to whether multiple contractual agreements should be evaluated as one arrangement and the identification of units of accounting in an arrangement requires significant judgment and impacts the amount of product and service revenue recognized in a given period. In accordance with ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Element Arrangements, based on the terms and conditions of the product arrangements, we believe that our products and services can be accounted for separately as our products and services have value to our customers on a stand-alone basis. Accordingly, amounts related to services not yet performed at the time of product shipment are deferred based on their relative selling price and recognized as revenue as such services are performed. The relative selling price of any undelivered products is also deferred at the time of shipment and recognized as revenue when these products are delivered. There is generally no customer right of return in our sales agreements. The sequence for typical multiple-element arrangements is as follows: we deliver our products, perform installation services and then provide post-contract support services. Vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value is based on the price charged when the element is sold separately. For multiple element arrangements, if VSOE cannot be established, we establish, where available, the selling price based on third-party evidence (“TPE”). TPE requires judgment and is determined based on evidence of competitor pricing for similar deliverables when sold separately. When we cannot determine VSOE or TPE, which is typically the case, we use the estimated selling price (“ESP”) in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would typically transact a stand-alone sale of the product or service. In determining ESP, we apply significant judgment as we weigh a variety of factors including our pricing policies, internal costs and gross margin objectives, method of distribution, information gathered from experience in customer negotiations, market research and information, recent technological trends, competitive landscape and geographies. The determination of ESP is approved by our management taking into consideration our pricing strategy. We regularly review VSOE, TPE and ESP and maintain internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates. We do not expect a material impact in future periods from changes in VSOE, TPE or ESP. Revenues related to long-term contracts for customized network solutions are recognized using the percentage-of- completion method. In using the percentage-of-completion method, we generally apply the cost-to-cost method of accounting where sales and profits are recorded based on the ratio of costs incurred to estimated total costs at completion. Contracts are combined when specific aggregation criteria are met including when the contracts are in substance an arrangement to perform a single project with a customer; the contracts are negotiated as a package in the same economic environment with an overall profit objective; the contracts require interrelated activities with common costs that cannot be separately identified with, or reasonably allocated to the elements, phases or units of output and the contracts are performed concurrently or in a continuous sequence under the same project management at the same location or at different locations in the same general vicinity. Recognition of profit on long-term contracts requires estimates of the total contract value, the total cost at completion and the measurement of progress towards completion. Significant judgment is required when estimating total contract costs and progress to completion on the arrangements as well as whether a loss is expected to be incurred on the contract. Amounts representing contract change orders, claims or other items are included in sales only when they can be reliably estimated and realization is probable. When adjustments in contract value or estimated costs are determined, any changes from prior estimates are reflected in earnings in the current period. Anticipated losses on contracts or programs in progress are charged to earnings when identified. fiscal 2014, our weighted average interest rate was 3.5% and we recorded total interest expense of $0.2 million on these Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria have been met: A 10% change in interest rates on the current borrowings or on future borrowings is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows since interest on our borrowings is not borrowings. material to our overall financial position. Critical Accounting Estimates Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following: • • • • revenue recognition; inventory valuation and provision for excess and obsolete inventory losses; impairment of long-lived assets; and income taxes and tax valuation allowances. In some cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result. Our senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The following is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies or estimates. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in “Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the notes to consolidated financial statements. In preparing our financial statements and accounting for the underlying transactions and balances, we apply those accounting policies. We consider the estimates discussed below as critical to an understanding of our financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on our judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Besides estimates that meet the “critical” accounting estimate criteria, we make many other accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. All estimates, whether or not deemed critical, affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are based on experience and other information available prior to the issuance of the financial statements. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known, including for estimates that we do not deem “critical.” Revenue Recognition We generate substantially all of our revenue from the sales or licensing of our microwave radio and wireless access systems, network management software, and professional services including installation and commissioning and training. Principal customers for our products and services include domestic and international wireless/mobile service providers, original equipment manufacturers, distributors, system integrators, as well as private network users such as public safety agencies, government institutions, and utility, pipeline, railroad and other industrial enterprises that operate broadband wireless networks. Our customers generally purchase a combination of our products and services as part of a multiple element arrangement. Our assessment of which revenue recognition guidance is appropriate to account for each element in an arrangement can involve significant judgment. This assessment has a significant impact on the amount and timing of revenue recognition. • Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. Contracts and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. • Delivery has occurred. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. • The fee is fixed or determinable. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. • Collectability is reasonably assured. We assess collectability based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history. We often enter into multiple contractual agreements with the same customer. Such agreements are reviewed to determine whether they should be evaluated as one arrangement. If an arrangement, other than a long-term contract, requires the delivery or performance of multiple deliverables or elements, we determine whether the individual elements represent “separate units of accounting”. The determination as to whether multiple contractual agreements should be evaluated as one arrangement and the identification of units of accounting in an arrangement requires significant judgment and impacts the amount of product and service revenue recognized in a given period. In accordance with ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Element Arrangements, based on the terms and conditions of the product arrangements, we believe that our products and services can be accounted for separately as our products and services have value to our customers on a stand-alone basis. Accordingly, amounts related to services not yet performed at the time of product shipment are deferred based on their relative selling price and recognized as revenue as such services are performed. The relative selling price of any undelivered products is also deferred at the time of shipment and recognized as revenue when these products are delivered. There is generally no customer right of return in our sales agreements. The sequence for typical multiple-element arrangements is as follows: we deliver our products, perform installation services and then provide post-contract support services. A n n u a l R e p o r t Vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value is based on the price charged when the element is sold separately. For multiple element arrangements, if VSOE cannot be established, we establish, where available, the selling price based on third-party evidence (“TPE”). TPE requires judgment and is determined based on evidence of competitor pricing for similar deliverables when sold separately. When we cannot determine VSOE or TPE, which is typically the case, we use the estimated selling price (“ESP”) in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would typically transact a stand-alone sale of the product or service. In determining ESP, we apply significant judgment as we weigh a variety of factors including our pricing policies, internal costs and gross margin objectives, method of distribution, information gathered from experience in customer negotiations, market research and information, recent technological trends, competitive landscape and geographies. The determination of ESP is approved by our management taking into consideration our pricing strategy. We regularly review VSOE, TPE and ESP and maintain internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates. We do not expect a material impact in future periods from changes in VSOE, TPE or ESP. Revenues related to long-term contracts for customized network solutions are recognized using the percentage-of- completion method. In using the percentage-of-completion method, we generally apply the cost-to-cost method of accounting where sales and profits are recorded based on the ratio of costs incurred to estimated total costs at completion. Contracts are combined when specific aggregation criteria are met including when the contracts are in substance an arrangement to perform a single project with a customer; the contracts are negotiated as a package in the same economic environment with an overall profit objective; the contracts require interrelated activities with common costs that cannot be separately identified with, or reasonably allocated to the elements, phases or units of output and the contracts are performed concurrently or in a continuous sequence under the same project management at the same location or at different locations in the same general vicinity. Recognition of profit on long-term contracts requires estimates of the total contract value, the total cost at completion and the measurement of progress towards completion. Significant judgment is required when estimating total contract costs and progress to completion on the arrangements as well as whether a loss is expected to be incurred on the contract. Amounts representing contract change orders, claims or other items are included in sales only when they can be reliably estimated and realization is probable. When adjustments in contract value or estimated costs are determined, any changes from prior estimates are reflected in earnings in the current period. Anticipated losses on contracts or programs in progress are charged to earnings when identified. 41 depends on meeting certain criteria in ASC 740, Income Taxes. One of the major criteria is the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character (for example, ordinary income or capital gain) within the carryback or carryforward periods available under the tax law. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change due to many factors, including future market conditions and our ability to successfully execute our business plans and/or tax planning strategies. Should there be a change in our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, our tax provision would increase or decrease in the period in which the assessment is changed. The accounting estimates related to the liability for uncertain tax position require us to make judgments regarding the sustainability of each uncertain tax position based on its technical merits. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate our reserves for the uncertain tax positions. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will be same as these estimates. These estimates are updated quarterly based on factors such as change in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, new audit activity, and effectively settled issues. Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements See Note 1 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a full description of recently issued accounting pronouncements, including the respective expected dates of adoption and effects on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. In the normal course of doing business, we are exposed to the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates. We employ established policies and procedures governing the use of financial instruments to manage our exposure to such risks. For a discussion of such policies and procedures and the related risks, see “Financial Risk Management” in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A. Inventory Valuation and Provisions for Excess and Obsolete Losses Our inventories have been valued at the lower of cost or market. We balance the need to maintain prudent inventory levels to ensure competitive delivery performance with the risk of excess or obsolete inventory due to changing technology and customer requirements, and new product introductions. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the manufacturing of our products was handled primarily by contract manufacturers. Our contract manufacturers procure components and manufacture our products based on our forecast of product demand. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand, the stage of the product life cycle, anticipated end of product life and production requirements. Several factors may influence the sale and use of our inventories, including decisions to exit a product line, technological change, new product development and competing product offerings. These factors could result in a change in the amount of obsolete inventory quantities on hand. Additionally, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory may be overstated or understated. In the future, if we determine that our inventory is overvalued, we would be required to recognize such costs in cost of product sales and services in our Statement of Operations at the time of such determination. In the case of goods which have been written down below cost at the close of a fiscal quarter, such reduced amount is considered the new lower cost basis for subsequent accounting purposes, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. We did not make any material changes in the valuation methodology during the past three fiscal years. t r o p e R l a u n n A Our customer service inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. We carry service parts because we generally provide product warranty for 12 to 36 months and earn revenue by providing enhanced and extended warranty and repair service during and beyond this warranty period. Customer service inventories consist of both component parts, which are primarily used to repair defective units, and finished units, which are provided for customer use permanently or on a temporary basis while the defective unit is being repaired. We record adjustments to reduce the carrying value of customer service inventories to their net realizable value. Factors influencing these adjustments include product life cycles, end of service life plans and volume of enhanced or extended warranty service contracts. Estimates of net realizable value involve significant estimates and judgments about the future, and revisions would be required if these factors differ from our estimates. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the assets. If impairment exists, the impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows from other asset groups. Our estimate of future cash flows is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance, growth rates and other factors. The actual cash flows realized from these assets may vary significantly from our estimates due to increased competition, changes in technology, fluctuations in demand, consolidation of our customers, reductions in average selling prices and other factors. Assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates are therefore subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Income Taxes and Tax Valuation Allowances We record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities of amounts reported in our consolidated balance sheet, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the opening and closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences may result in an increase or decrease to our tax provision in a subsequent period in which such determination is made. We record deferred taxes by applying enacted statutory tax rates to the respective jurisdictions and follow specific and detailed guidelines in each tax jurisdiction regarding the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet and provide necessary valuation allowances as required. Future realization of deferred tax assets ultimately 42 Inventory Valuation and Provisions for Excess and Obsolete Losses Our inventories have been valued at the lower of cost or market. We balance the need to maintain prudent inventory levels to ensure competitive delivery performance with the risk of excess or obsolete inventory due to changing technology and customer requirements, and new product introductions. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the manufacturing of our products was handled primarily by contract manufacturers. Our contract manufacturers procure components and manufacture our products based on our forecast of product demand. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand, the stage of the product life cycle, anticipated end of product life and production requirements. Several factors may influence the sale and use of our inventories, including decisions to exit a product line, technological change, new product development and competing product offerings. These factors could result in a change in the amount of obsolete inventory quantities on hand. Additionally, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory may be overstated or understated. In the future, if we determine that our inventory is overvalued, we would be required to recognize such costs in cost of product sales and services in our Statement of Operations at the time of such determination. In the case of goods which have been written down below cost at the close of a fiscal quarter, such reduced amount is considered the new lower cost basis for subsequent accounting purposes, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. We did not make any material changes in the valuation methodology during the past three fiscal years. Our customer service inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. We carry service parts because we generally provide product warranty for 12 to 36 months and earn revenue by providing enhanced and extended warranty and repair service during and beyond this warranty period. Customer service inventories consist of both component parts, which are primarily used to repair defective units, and finished units, which are provided for customer use permanently or on a temporary basis while the defective unit is being repaired. We record adjustments to reduce the carrying value of customer service inventories to their net realizable value. Factors influencing these adjustments include product life cycles, end of service life plans and volume of enhanced or extended warranty service contracts. Estimates of net realizable value involve significant estimates and judgments about the future, and revisions would be required if these factors differ from our estimates. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the assets. If impairment exists, the impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows from other asset groups. Our estimate of future cash flows is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance, growth rates and other factors. The actual cash flows realized from these assets may vary significantly from our estimates due to increased competition, changes in technology, fluctuations in demand, consolidation of our customers, reductions in average selling prices and other factors. Assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates are therefore subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Income Taxes and Tax Valuation Allowances We record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities of amounts reported in our consolidated balance sheet, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the opening and closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences may result in an increase or decrease to our tax provision in a subsequent period in which such determination is made. We record deferred taxes by applying enacted statutory tax rates to the respective jurisdictions and follow specific and detailed guidelines in each tax jurisdiction regarding the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet and provide necessary valuation allowances as required. Future realization of deferred tax assets ultimately depends on meeting certain criteria in ASC 740, Income Taxes. One of the major criteria is the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character (for example, ordinary income or capital gain) within the carryback or carryforward periods available under the tax law. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change due to many factors, including future market conditions and our ability to successfully execute our business plans and/or tax planning strategies. Should there be a change in our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, our tax provision would increase or decrease in the period in which the assessment is changed. The accounting estimates related to the liability for uncertain tax position require us to make judgments regarding the sustainability of each uncertain tax position based on its technical merits. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate our reserves for the uncertain tax positions. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will be same as these estimates. These estimates are updated quarterly based on factors such as change in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, new audit activity, and effectively settled issues. Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements See Note 1 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a full description of recently issued accounting pronouncements, including the respective expected dates of adoption and effects on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. In the normal course of doing business, we are exposed to the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates. We employ established policies and procedures governing the use of financial instruments to manage our exposure to such risks. For a discussion of such policies and procedures and the related risks, see “Financial Risk Management” in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A. A n n u a l R e p o r t 43 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Index to Financial Statements Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations for Fiscal Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 . Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for Fiscal Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Fiscal Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for Fiscal Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statement Schedule: Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 45 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 121 t r o p e R l a u n n A Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders Aviat Networks, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aviat Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries ("the Company") as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 27, 2014. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts and reserves. These consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aviat Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 27, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Aviat Networks, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated December 19, 2014 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Santa Clara, CA December 19, 2014 /s/ KPMG LLP 44 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Index to Financial Statements Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations for Fiscal Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 . Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for Fiscal Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Fiscal Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for Fiscal Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statement Schedule: Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Page 45 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders Aviat Networks, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aviat Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries ("the Company") as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 27, 2014. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts and reserves. These consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aviat Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 27, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. A n n u a l R e p o r t We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Aviat Networks, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated December 19, 2014 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Santa Clara, CA December 19, 2014 /s/ KPMG LLP 45 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statements referring to corrective actions taken after June 27, 2014, relative to the aforementioned material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Santa Clara, CA December 19, 2014 /s/ KPMG LLP t r o p e R l a u n n A The Board of Directors and Stockholders Aviat Networks, Inc.: We have audited Aviat Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (“the Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Material weaknesses related to the Company’s control environment, risk assessment processes, information and communication, monitoring activities, as well as control activities specific to manual journal entries, account reconciliations, and revenue recognition related to percentage-of- completion contracts, have been identified and included in management’s assessment in Item 9A(a). We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, cash flows, and financial statement schedule of the Company. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2014 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our audit opinion dated December 19, 2014, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).. 46 The Board of Directors and Stockholders Aviat Networks, Inc.: We have audited Aviat Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (“the Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Material weaknesses related to the Company’s control environment, risk assessment processes, information and communication, monitoring activities, as well as control activities specific to manual journal entries, account reconciliations, and revenue recognition related to percentage-of- completion contracts, have been identified and included in management’s assessment in Item 9A(a). We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, cash flows, and financial statement schedule of the Company. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2014 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our audit opinion dated December 19, 2014, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statements referring to corrective actions taken after June 27, 2014, relative to the aforementioned material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Santa Clara, CA December 19, 2014 /s/ KPMG LLP A n n u a l R e p o r t 47 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Aviat Networks, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows of Aviat Networks, Inc. for the year ended June 29, 2012. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of the operations and cash flows of Aviat Networks, Inc. for the year ended June 29, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. Redwood City, California September 4, 2012 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP t r o p e R l a u n n A AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In millions, except per share amounts) Revenues: Revenue from product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 Revenue from services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of revenues: Cost of product sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total cost of revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses: Research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling and administrative expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of identifiable intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss from continuing operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222.6 123.4 346.0 172.7 88.2 260.9 85.1 35.5 88.8 0.4 — 11.1 135.8 (50.7) — 0.5 (0.4) (50.6) 1.5 (52.1) 0.9 336.7 134.6 471.3 239.6 91.6 331.2 140.1 39.4 95.5 138.4 0.4 — 3.1 1.7 0.7 0.8 (0.8) 2.4 13.3 (10.9) (4.1) Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (51.2) $ (15.0) $ Basic and diluted loss per common share: Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61.6 (0.85) $ 0.01 $ (0.83) $ (0.18) $ (0.07) $ (0.25) $ 60.0 335.5 108.5 444.0 233.5 78.8 312.3 131.7 36.0 99.5 1.6 5.6 2.3 145.0 (13.3) — 0.6 (1.3) (14.0) 1.5 (15.5) (8.6) (24.1) (0.26) (0.15) (0.41) 59.0 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 48 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Aviat Networks, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows of Aviat Networks, Inc. for the year ended June 29, 2012. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of the operations and cash flows of Aviat Networks, Inc. for the year ended June 29, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. Redwood City, California September 4, 2012 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In millions, except per share amounts) Revenues: Revenue from product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Revenue from services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of revenues: Cost of product sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total cost of revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses: Research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling and administrative expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of identifiable intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss from continuing operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Basic and diluted loss per common share: Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 $ 222.6 123.4 346.0 172.7 88.2 260.9 85.1 35.5 88.8 0.4 — 11.1 135.8 (50.7) — 0.5 (0.4) (50.6) 1.5 (52.1) 0.9 (51.2) $ (0.85) $ $ 0.01 (0.83) $ 61.6 $ 336.7 134.6 471.3 239.6 91.6 331.2 140.1 39.4 95.5 0.4 — 3.1 138.4 1.7 0.7 0.8 (0.8) 2.4 13.3 (10.9) (4.1) (15.0) $ (0.18) $ (0.07) $ (0.25) $ 60.0 335.5 108.5 444.0 233.5 78.8 312.3 131.7 36.0 99.5 1.6 5.6 2.3 145.0 (13.3) — 0.6 (1.3) (14.0) 1.5 (15.5) (8.6) (24.1) (0.26) (0.15) (0.41) 59.0 A n n u a l R e p o r t See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 49 AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In millions) Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Other comprehensive income (loss): Cash flow hedges: Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 (51.2) $ (15.0) $ (24.1) ASSETS Current Assets Change in unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassification adjustment for realized net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges included in net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activities . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.3) 0.2 (0.1) 0.5 0.1 — 0.1 0.6 0.4 (50.8) $ 0.7 (14.3) $ 0.9 (0.8) 0.1 (1.4) (1.3) (25.4) t r o p e R l a u n n A See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ (In millions, except share and par value amounts) June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ Receivables, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unbilled costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer service inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-Term Assets Property, plant and equipment, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Identifiable intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total long-term assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218.2 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities Short-term debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued compensation and benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Advance payments and unearned income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reserve for uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130.9 Long-Term Liabilities Unearned income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reserve for uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150.6 Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13) Stockholders’ Equity Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; none issued . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 62,218,226 shares as of June 27, 2014 and 61,252,494 shares as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . Additional paid-in-capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 48.8 77.2 23.8 38.1 11.4 1.5 17.4 29.3 0.4 3.4 1.9 35.0 253.2 6.0 46.1 10.1 32.4 33.3 — 0.2 2.8 8.5 5.0 1.0 5.2 — 0.6 807.0 (702.1) (2.9) 102.6 253.2 90.0 86.3 28.9 35.0 16.2 0.9 17.0 274.3 28.8 0.8 1.4 0.5 31.5 305.8 8.8 50.6 12.4 33.7 18.6 3.6 1.1 2.3 131.1 8.5 2.3 12.3 1.7 155.9 — 0.6 803.5 (650.9) (3.3) 149.9 305.8 50 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In millions, except share and par value amounts) June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (51.2) $ (15.0) $ (24.1) Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 (In millions) Other comprehensive income (loss): Cash flow hedges: Change in unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassification adjustment for realized net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges included in net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activities . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (0.3) 0.2 (0.1) 0.5 0.4 0.1 — 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.9 (0.8) 0.1 (1.4) (1.3) Comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (50.8) $ (14.3) $ (25.4) See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Receivables, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unbilled costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer service inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-Term Assets Property, plant and equipment, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Identifiable intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total long-term assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities Short-term debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued compensation and benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Advance payments and unearned income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reserve for uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-Term Liabilities Unearned income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reserve for uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13) Stockholders’ Equity Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; none issued . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 62,218,226 shares as of June 27, 2014 and 61,252,494 shares as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . Additional paid-in-capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 51 $ $ 48.8 77.2 23.8 38.1 11.4 1.5 17.4 218.2 29.3 0.4 3.4 1.9 35.0 253.2 6.0 46.1 10.1 32.4 33.3 — 0.2 2.8 130.9 8.5 5.0 1.0 5.2 150.6 A n n u a l R e p o r t 90.0 86.3 28.9 35.0 16.2 0.9 17.0 274.3 28.8 0.8 1.4 0.5 31.5 305.8 8.8 50.6 12.4 33.7 18.6 3.6 1.1 2.3 131.1 8.5 2.3 12.3 1.7 155.9 — — 0.6 807.0 (702.1) (2.9) 102.6 253.2 $ 0.6 803.5 (650.9) (3.3) 149.9 305.8 AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 (In millions) Common Stock Shares Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Accumulated Other Total Accumulated Deficit Comprehensive Income (Loss) Stockholders’ Equity (51.2) $ (15.0) $ (24.1) Balance as of July 1, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.6 $ 0.6 $ 791.6 $ (611.8) $ (2.7) $ 0.4 7.1 — 0.8 3.4 7.2 — (0.1) 8.2 5.1 (7.0) 1.5 (2.7) (6.4) 14.6 2.7 (14.9) 2.0 (29.3) — (9.4) (9.4) — (2.8) 0.1 — (0.1) (2.8) 0.3 (41.2) 90.0 48.8 $ $ $ — (1.3) (4.0) — — — 0.7 — — — 0.4 — — (3.3) 177.7 (24.1) (1.3) 157.5 (15.0) — 5.2 0.7 0.3 6.4 0.4 0.1 3.4 149.9 (51.2) Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of stock related to employee share-based awards . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of stock related to employee share-based awards . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of stock related to employee share-based awards . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 0.7 — 61.3 — — — — 61.3 — — 0.9 — — — — — 0.6 — — — — 0.6 — — — — 796.8 (635.9) (15.0) 803.5 (650.9) (51.2) (24.1) — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.2 — — 0.3 6.4 — — 0.1 3.4 Balance as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.2 $ 0.6 $ 807.0 $ (702.1) $ (2.9) $ 102.6 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 1.0 5.6 — 2.5 6.4 9.7 (0.4) (0.1) 1.9 (3.1) 13.6 0.9 (7.1) (3.2) (14.1) (1.6) 11.5 (0.1) 8.4 (0.1) (10.4) (10.5) — (4.1) 0.3 — (0.1) (3.9) — (6.0) 96.0 90.0 0.8 3.0 0.4 $ $ $ $ 2.3 4.9 5.6 3.9 5.2 4.8 1.9 — 38.4 (1.1) (9.0) 0.7 (18.3) (6.2) (4.6) 0.1 (0.5) 4.4 8.4 (1.5) (5.9) (7.4) 8.3 (1.4) 0.1 (8.3) — (1.3) (1.9) (2.2) 98.2 96.0 1.3 1.3 — t r o p e R l a u n n A (In millions) Operating Activities Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Amortization of identifiable intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bad debt expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charges for inventory and customer service inventory write-downs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on disposition of WiMAX business. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other non-cash items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unbilled costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer service inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Advance payments and unearned income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable or receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reserve for uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets and liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investing Activities Cash disbursed related to sale of WiMAX business, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financing Activities Proceeds from debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayments of debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from share-based compensation awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Redemption of preference shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments on capital lease obligations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in financing activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents, end of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Cash paid for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.4 14.7 Non-cash investing activities: Property and equipment acquired under capital lease. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 52 AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 (In millions) Common Stock Shares Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Accumulated Deficit Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total Stockholders’ Equity Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (51.2) $ (15.0) $ (24.1) Balance as of July 1, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.6 $ 0.6 $ 791.6 $ (611.8) $ (2.7) $ Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of stock related to employee share-based awards . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of stock related to employee share-based awards . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of stock related to employee share-based awards . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 0.7 — 61.3 — — — — 61.3 — — 0.9 — — — — — 0.6 — — — — 0.6 — — — — — — — 5.2 796.8 — — 0.3 6.4 803.5 — — 0.1 3.4 (24.1) — — — (635.9) (15.0) — — — (650.9) (51.2) — — — — (1.3) — — (4.0) — 0.7 — — (3.3) — 0.4 — — 177.7 (24.1) (1.3) — 5.2 157.5 (15.0) 0.7 0.3 6.4 149.9 (51.2) 0.4 0.1 3.4 Balance as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.2 $ 0.6 $ 807.0 $ (702.1) $ (2.9) $ 102.6 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements A n n u a l R e p o r t (In millions) Operating Activities Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Amortization of identifiable intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bad debt expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charges for inventory and customer service inventory write-downs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on disposition of WiMAX business. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other non-cash items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unbilled costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer service inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Advance payments and unearned income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable or receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reserve for uncertain tax positions and deferred taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets and liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investing Activities Financing Activities Cash disbursed related to sale of WiMAX business, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayments of debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from share-based compensation awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Redemption of preference shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments on capital lease obligations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in financing activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents, end of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.4 7.1 — 0.8 3.4 7.2 — (0.1) 8.2 5.1 (7.0) 1.5 (2.7) (6.4) 14.6 2.7 (14.9) 2.0 (29.3) — (9.4) (9.4) — (2.8) 0.1 — (0.1) (2.8) 0.3 (41.2) 90.0 48.8 0.4 14.7 1.0 5.6 — 2.5 6.4 9.7 (0.4) (0.1) 1.9 (3.1) 13.6 0.9 (7.1) (3.2) (14.1) (1.6) 11.5 (0.1) 8.4 (0.1) (10.4) (10.5) — (4.1) 0.3 — (0.1) (3.9) — (6.0) 96.0 90.0 0.8 3.0 0.4 2.3 4.9 5.6 3.9 5.2 4.8 1.9 — 38.4 (1.1) (9.0) 0.7 (18.3) (6.2) (4.6) 0.1 (0.5) 4.4 8.4 (1.5) (5.9) (7.4) 8.3 (1.4) 0.1 (8.3) — (1.3) (1.9) (2.2) 98.2 96.0 1.3 1.3 — Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Cash paid for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Non-cash investing activities: Property and equipment acquired under capital lease. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 53 AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Company We design, manufacture and sell a range of wireless networking solutions and services to mobile and fixed telephone service providers, private network operators, government agencies, transportation and utility companies, public safety agencies and broadcast system operators across the globe. Our products include broadband wireless access base stations and customer premises equipment for fixed and mobile, point-to-point digital microwave radio systems for access, backhaul, trunking and license-exempt applications, supporting new network deployments, network expansion, and capacity upgrades. We were incorporated in Delaware in 2006 to combine the businesses of Harris Corporation’s Microwave Communications Division (“MCD”) and Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”). On January 28, 2010, we changed our corporate name from Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. to Aviat Networks, Inc. (“Aviat Networks,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) to more effectively reflect our business and communicate our brand identity to customers. Additionally, the change of our corporate name was to comply with the termination of the Harris Corporation (“Harris”) trademark licensing agreement resulting from the spin-off by Harris of its interest in our stock to its stockholders in May 2009. Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aviat Networks and its wholly-owned and majority owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. t r o p e R l a u n n A Our fiscal year ends on the Friday nearest June 30. This was June 27 for fiscal 2014, June 28 for fiscal 2013 and (In millions) June 29 for fiscal 2012. All fiscal years presented each included 52 weeks. In these notes to consolidated financial statements, we refer to our fiscal years as “fiscal 2014”, “fiscal 2013” and “fiscal 2012.” Customer letters of credit discounted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments affecting the amounts reported and related disclosures. Estimates are based upon historical factors, current circumstances and the experience and judgment of our management. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and may employ outside experts to assist us in making these evaluations. Changes in such estimates, based on more accurate information, or different assumptions or conditions, may affect amounts reported in future periods. Such estimates affect significant items, including revenue recognition, provision for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, uncertainties in income taxes, restructuring obligations, product warranty obligations, share-based awards, contingencies and useful lives of intangible assets, property, plant and equipment. Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents that are restricted as to withdrawal or usage under the terms of contractual agreements are recorded as restricted cash. At June 27, 2014, restricted cash included cash balances in our disability insurance voluntary plan account that cannot be used by us for any operating purposes other than to pay benefits to the insured employees and was recorded in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. The corresponding liabilities were recorded under other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Cash equivalents are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these investments. Amortization or accretion of premium or discount is included in interest income on the consolidated statements of operations. We hold cash and cash equivalents at several major financial institutions, which often significantly exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. However, a substantial portion of the cash equivalents is invested in prime money market funds which are backed by the securities in the fund. Historically, we have not experienced any losses due to such concentration of credit risk. 54 We invest our excess cash in high-quality marketable debt securities to ensure that cash is readily available for use in our current operations. Investments with original maturities greater than three months but less than one year are accounted for as short-term and are classified as such at the time of purchase. Marketable securities are classified as “available-for-sale” and are classified as short-term because we view our entire portfolio as available for use in our As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, all of our high-quality marketable debt securities were classified as cash current operations. equivalents. Accounts Receivable, Major Customers and Other Significant Concentrations We typically invoice our customers for the sales order (or contract) value of the related products delivered at various milestones, including order receipt, shipment, installation and acceptance and for services when rendered. Our trade receivables are derived from sales to customers located in North America, Africa, Europe, the Middle East, Russia, Asia-Pacific and Latin America. Accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts to reflect any loss anticipated on the collection of accounts receivable balances. We calculate the allowance based on our history of write- offs, level of past due accounts and economic status of the customers. The fair value of our accounts receivable approximates their net realizable value. We regularly require letters of credit from some customers and we generally discount these letters of credit with various financial institutions. Under these arrangements, collection risk is fully transferred to the financial institutions. We record the cost of discounting these letters of credit as interest expense. Total customer letters of credit discounted and related interest expense are as follows: Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 $ $ 1.8 $ — $ 36.8 0.2 $ $ 59.1 0.3 During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, we had one international customer in Africa, Mobile Telephone Networks Group (“MTN Group”) that accounted for 17%, 25% and 17%, respectively, of our total revenue. In addition, Verizon Wireless accounted for 11% of our total revenue during fiscal 2013. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, MTN Group accounted for approximately 17% and 12%, respectively, of our accounts receivable. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of our revenue or accounts receivable for the years presented. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents, marketable debt securities, trade accounts receivable and financial instruments used in foreign currency hedging activities. We invest our excess cash primarily in prime money market funds and certificates of deposit. We are exposed to credit risks related to such instruments in the event of default or decrease in credit-worthiness of the issuers of the investments. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and generally do not require collateral on accounts receivable, as the majority of our customers are large, well-established companies. However, in certain circumstances, we may require letters of credit, additional guarantees or advance payments. We maintain allowances for collection losses, but historically have not experienced any significant losses related to any particular geographic area since our business is not concentrated within any particular geographic region. Our customers are primarily in the telecommunications industry, so our accounts receivable are concentrated within one industry and exposed to concentrations of credit risk within that industry. Accounts receivable are written off when attempts to collect outstanding amounts have been exhausted or there are other indicators that the amounts are no longer collectible. We rely on sole providers for certain components of our products and rely on a limited number of contract manufacturers and suppliers to provide manufacturing services for our products. The inability of a contract manufacturer or supplier to fulfill our supply requirements could materially impact future operating results. We have entered into agreements relating to our foreign currency contracts with large, multinational financial institutions. The amounts subject to credit risk arising from the possible inability of any such parties to meet the terms of their contracts are generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which such party’s obligations exceed our obligations to that party. AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Company We design, manufacture and sell a range of wireless networking solutions and services to mobile and fixed telephone service providers, private network operators, government agencies, transportation and utility companies, public safety agencies and broadcast system operators across the globe. Our products include broadband wireless access base stations and customer premises equipment for fixed and mobile, point-to-point digital microwave radio systems for access, backhaul, trunking and license-exempt applications, supporting new network deployments, network expansion, and capacity upgrades. We were incorporated in Delaware in 2006 to combine the businesses of Harris Corporation’s Microwave Communications Division (“MCD”) and Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”). On January 28, 2010, we changed our corporate name from Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. to Aviat Networks, Inc. (“Aviat Networks,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) to more effectively reflect our business and communicate our brand identity to customers. Additionally, the change of our corporate name was to comply with the termination of the Harris Corporation (“Harris”) trademark licensing agreement resulting from the spin-off by Harris of its interest in our stock to its stockholders in May 2009. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aviat Networks and its wholly-owned and majority owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. Our fiscal year ends on the Friday nearest June 30. This was June 27 for fiscal 2014, June 28 for fiscal 2013 and June 29 for fiscal 2012. All fiscal years presented each included 52 weeks. In these notes to consolidated financial statements, we refer to our fiscal years as “fiscal 2014”, “fiscal 2013” and “fiscal 2012.” Basis of Presentation Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments affecting the amounts reported and related disclosures. Estimates are based upon historical factors, current circumstances and the experience and judgment of our management. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and may employ outside experts to assist us in making these evaluations. Changes in such estimates, based on more accurate information, or different assumptions or conditions, may affect amounts reported in future periods. Such estimates affect significant items, including revenue recognition, provision for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, uncertainties in income taxes, restructuring obligations, product warranty obligations, share-based awards, contingencies and useful lives of intangible assets, property, plant and equipment. Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents that are restricted as to withdrawal or usage under the terms of contractual agreements are recorded as restricted cash. At June 27, 2014, restricted cash included cash balances in our disability insurance voluntary plan account that cannot be used by us for any operating purposes other than to pay benefits to the insured employees and was recorded in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. The corresponding liabilities were recorded under other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Cash equivalents are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these investments. Amortization or accretion of premium or discount is included in interest income on the consolidated statements of operations. We hold cash and cash equivalents at several major financial institutions, which often significantly exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. However, a substantial portion of the cash equivalents is invested in prime money market funds which are backed by the securities in the fund. Historically, we have not experienced any losses due to such concentration of credit risk. We invest our excess cash in high-quality marketable debt securities to ensure that cash is readily available for use in our current operations. Investments with original maturities greater than three months but less than one year are accounted for as short-term and are classified as such at the time of purchase. Marketable securities are classified as “available-for-sale” and are classified as short-term because we view our entire portfolio as available for use in our current operations. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, all of our high-quality marketable debt securities were classified as cash equivalents. Accounts Receivable, Major Customers and Other Significant Concentrations We typically invoice our customers for the sales order (or contract) value of the related products delivered at various milestones, including order receipt, shipment, installation and acceptance and for services when rendered. Our trade receivables are derived from sales to customers located in North America, Africa, Europe, the Middle East, Russia, Asia-Pacific and Latin America. Accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts to reflect any loss anticipated on the collection of accounts receivable balances. We calculate the allowance based on our history of write- offs, level of past due accounts and economic status of the customers. The fair value of our accounts receivable approximates their net realizable value. We regularly require letters of credit from some customers and we generally discount these letters of credit with various financial institutions. Under these arrangements, collection risk is fully transferred to the financial institutions. We record the cost of discounting these letters of credit as interest expense. Total customer letters of credit discounted and related interest expense are as follows: (In millions) Customer letters of credit discounted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 2014 2013 2012 1.8 $ — $ 36.8 0.2 $ $ 59.1 0.3 Fiscal Year A n n u a l R e p o r t During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, we had one international customer in Africa, Mobile Telephone Networks Group (“MTN Group”) that accounted for 17%, 25% and 17%, respectively, of our total revenue. In addition, Verizon Wireless accounted for 11% of our total revenue during fiscal 2013. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, MTN Group accounted for approximately 17% and 12%, respectively, of our accounts receivable. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of our revenue or accounts receivable for the years presented. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents, marketable debt securities, trade accounts receivable and financial instruments used in foreign currency hedging activities. We invest our excess cash primarily in prime money market funds and certificates of deposit. We are exposed to credit risks related to such instruments in the event of default or decrease in credit-worthiness of the issuers of the investments. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and generally do not require collateral on accounts receivable, as the majority of our customers are large, well-established companies. However, in certain circumstances, we may require letters of credit, additional guarantees or advance payments. We maintain allowances for collection losses, but historically have not experienced any significant losses related to any particular geographic area since our business is not concentrated within any particular geographic region. Our customers are primarily in the telecommunications industry, so our accounts receivable are concentrated within one industry and exposed to concentrations of credit risk within that industry. Accounts receivable are written off when attempts to collect outstanding amounts have been exhausted or there are other indicators that the amounts are no longer collectible. We rely on sole providers for certain components of our products and rely on a limited number of contract manufacturers and suppliers to provide manufacturing services for our products. The inability of a contract manufacturer or supplier to fulfill our supply requirements could materially impact future operating results. We have entered into agreements relating to our foreign currency contracts with large, multinational financial institutions. The amounts subject to credit risk arising from the possible inability of any such parties to meet the terms of their contracts are generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which such party’s obligations exceed our obligations to that party. 55 Inventories Property, Plant and Equipment t r o p e R l a u n n A Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using standard cost, which approximates actual cost on a weighted-average basis. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements. Inventory adjustments are measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and charged to the provision for inventory, which is a component of cost of sales. At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established, and any subsequent improvements in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. Customer Service Inventories Our customer service inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. We carry service parts because we generally provide product warranty for 12 to 36 months and earn revenue by providing enhanced and extended warranty and repair service during and beyond this warranty period. Customer service inventories consist of both component parts, which are primarily used to repair defective units, and finished units, which are provided for customer use permanently or on a temporary basis while the defective unit is being repaired. We record adjustments to reduce the carrying value of customer service inventories to their net realizable value. Factors influencing these adjustments include product life cycles, end of service life plans and volume of enhanced or extended warranty service contracts. Estimates of net realizable value involve significant estimates and judgments about the future, and revisions would be required if these factors differ from our estimates. Income Taxes and Related Uncertainties We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, as measured by tax rates at which temporary differences are expected to reverse as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) is the result of changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established to offset any deferred tax assets if, based upon the available information, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We are required to compute our income taxes in each federal, state, and international jurisdiction in which we operate. This process requires that we estimate the current tax exposure as well as assess temporary differences between the accounting and tax treatment of assets and liabilities, including items such as accruals and allowances not currently deductible for tax purposes as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. The income tax effects of the differences we identify are classified as current or long-term deferred tax assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Our judgments, assumptions, and estimates relative to the current provision for income taxes take into account current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax laws, and possible outcomes of current and future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax authorities. Changes in tax laws or our interpretation of tax laws and the resolution of current and future tax audits could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations. We must also assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income and, based on this assessment, establish a valuation allowance, if required. Our determination of our valuation allowance is based upon a number of assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and the relative proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various domestic and international jurisdictions in which we operate. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change the valuation allowance in a period, we reflect the change with a corresponding increase or decrease to our tax provision in our consolidated statements of operations. We use a two-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this requires us to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision in the period. 56 Property, plant and equipment are stated on the basis of cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. We capitalize costs of software, consulting services, hardware and other related costs incurred to purchase or develop internal-use software. We expense costs incurred during preliminary project assessment, re-engineering, training and application maintenance. Leasehold improvements made either at the inception of the lease or during the lease term are amortized over the remaining current lease term, or estimated life, if shorter. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvements. The useful lives of the assets are generally as follows: Buildings and leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 to 45 years Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 to 5 years Machinery and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 to 5 years Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are removed from the respective property accounts, and any gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the assets. If impairment exists, the impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows from other asset groups. Our estimate of future cash flows is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance, growth rates and other factors. The actual cash flows realized from these assets may vary significantly from our estimates due to increased competition, changes in technology, fluctuations in demand, consolidation of our customers, reductions in average selling prices and other factors. Assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates are therefore subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Other Accrued Expenses and Other Assets No accrued liabilities or expenses within other accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets exceeded 5% of our total current liabilities as of June 27, 2014 or June 28, 2013. Other accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets primarily consists of accruals for sales commissions, warranties and severance. No current assets other than those already disclosed in the consolidated balance sheets exceeded 5% of our total current assets as of June 27, 2014 or June 28, 2013. No assets within other assets in the consolidated balance sheets exceeded 5% of total assets as of June 27, 2014 or June 28, 2013. Warranties On product sales we provide for future warranty costs upon product delivery. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary depending upon the product sold and country in which we do business. In the case of products sold by us, our warranties generally start from the delivery date and continue for one to three years, depending on the terms. Many of our products are manufactured to customer specifications and their acceptance is based on meeting those specifications. Factors that affect our warranty liabilities include the number of product units subject to warranty protection, historical experience and management’s judgment regarding anticipated rates of warranty claims and cost per claim. We assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liabilities every quarter and make adjustments to the liabilities as necessary. Inventories Property, Plant and Equipment Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using standard cost, which approximates actual cost on a weighted-average basis. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements. Inventory adjustments are measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and charged to the provision for inventory, which is a component of cost of sales. At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established, and any subsequent improvements in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. Customer Service Inventories Our customer service inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. We carry service parts because we generally provide product warranty for 12 to 36 months and earn revenue by providing enhanced and extended warranty and repair service during and beyond this warranty period. Customer service inventories consist of both component parts, which are primarily used to repair defective units, and finished units, which are provided for customer use permanently or on a temporary basis while the defective unit is being repaired. We record adjustments to reduce the carrying value of customer service inventories to their net realizable value. Factors influencing these adjustments include product life cycles, end of service life plans and volume of enhanced or extended warranty service contracts. Estimates of net realizable value involve significant estimates and judgments about the future, and revisions would be required if these factors differ from our estimates. Income Taxes and Related Uncertainties We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, as measured by tax rates at which temporary differences are expected to reverse as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) is the result of changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established to offset any deferred tax assets if, based upon the available information, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We are required to compute our income taxes in each federal, state, and international jurisdiction in which we operate. This process requires that we estimate the current tax exposure as well as assess temporary differences between the accounting and tax treatment of assets and liabilities, including items such as accruals and allowances not currently deductible for tax purposes as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. The income tax effects of the differences we identify are classified as current or long-term deferred tax assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Our judgments, assumptions, and estimates relative to the current provision for income taxes take into account current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax laws, and possible outcomes of current and future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax authorities. Changes in tax laws or our interpretation of tax laws and the resolution of current and future tax audits could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations. We must also assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income and, based on this assessment, establish a valuation allowance, if required. Our determination of our valuation allowance is based upon a number of assumptions, judgments, and estimates, including forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and the relative proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various domestic and international jurisdictions in which we operate. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change the valuation allowance in a period, we reflect the change with a corresponding increase or decrease to our tax provision in our consolidated statements of operations. We use a two-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this requires us to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision in the period. Property, plant and equipment are stated on the basis of cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. We capitalize costs of software, consulting services, hardware and other related costs incurred to purchase or develop internal-use software. We expense costs incurred during preliminary project assessment, re-engineering, training and application maintenance. Leasehold improvements made either at the inception of the lease or during the lease term are amortized over the remaining current lease term, or estimated life, if shorter. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvements. The useful lives of the assets are generally as follows: Buildings and leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 to 45 years Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 to 5 years Machinery and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 to 5 years A n n u a l R e p o r t Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are removed from the respective property accounts, and any gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the assets. If impairment exists, the impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows from other asset groups. Our estimate of future cash flows is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance, growth rates and other factors. The actual cash flows realized from these assets may vary significantly from our estimates due to increased competition, changes in technology, fluctuations in demand, consolidation of our customers, reductions in average selling prices and other factors. Assumptions underlying future cash flow estimates are therefore subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Other Accrued Expenses and Other Assets No accrued liabilities or expenses within other accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets exceeded 5% of our total current liabilities as of June 27, 2014 or June 28, 2013. Other accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets primarily consists of accruals for sales commissions, warranties and severance. No current assets other than those already disclosed in the consolidated balance sheets exceeded 5% of our total current assets as of June 27, 2014 or June 28, 2013. No assets within other assets in the consolidated balance sheets exceeded 5% of total assets as of June 27, 2014 or June 28, 2013. Warranties On product sales we provide for future warranty costs upon product delivery. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary depending upon the product sold and country in which we do business. In the case of products sold by us, our warranties generally start from the delivery date and continue for one to three years, depending on the terms. Many of our products are manufactured to customer specifications and their acceptance is based on meeting those specifications. Factors that affect our warranty liabilities include the number of product units subject to warranty protection, historical experience and management’s judgment regarding anticipated rates of warranty claims and cost per claim. We assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liabilities every quarter and make adjustments to the liabilities as necessary. 57 Network management software products generally carry a 30-day to 90-day warranty from the date of customer acceptance. Our liability under these warranties is to provide a corrected copy of any portion of the software found not to be in substantial compliance with the agreed-upon specifications. Operating Leases We lease facilities and equipment under various operating leases. These lease agreements generally include rent escalation clauses, and many include renewal periods at our option. We recognize expense for scheduled rent increases on a straight-line basis over the lease term beginning with the date we take possession of the leased space. Leasehold improvements made either at the inception of the lease or during the lease term are amortized over the current lease term, or estimated life, if shorter. Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency of our subsidiaries located in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Mexico, Algeria and New Zealand is the U.S. dollar. Determination of the functional currency is dependent upon the economic environment in which an entity operates as well as the customers and suppliers the entity conducts business with. Changes in facts and circumstances may occur which could lead to a change in the functional currency of that entity. Accordingly, all of the monetary assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are re-measured into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate as of the applicable balance sheet date, and all non-monetary assets and liabilities are re-measured at historical rates. Income and expenses are re-measured at the average exchange rate prevailing during the period. Gains and losses resulting from the re-measurement of these subsidiaries’ financial statements are included in the consolidated statements of operations. Our other international subsidiaries use their respective local currency as their functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the local current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and income and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rates during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. t r o p e R l a u n n A Gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions and translation of monetary assets and liabilities in non-functional currencies are included in cost of product sales and services in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Net foreign exchange losses recorded in our consolidated statements of operations during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 totaled $0.8 million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Retirement Benefits As of June 27, 2014, we provided retirement benefits to substantially all employees primarily through our defined contribution retirement plans. These plans have matching and savings elements. Contributions by us to these retirement plans are based on profits and employees’ savings with no other funding requirements. We may make additional contributions to the plan at our discretion. However, effective from the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we halted making matching contributions to the plan for an indefinite period of time. Contributions to retirement plans are expensed as incurred. Retirement plan expense amounted to $2.5 million, $2.9 million and $2.8 million in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Revenue Recognition We generate substantially all of our revenue from the sales or licensing of our microwave radio and wireless access systems, network management software, and professional services including installation and commissioning and training. Principal customers for our products and services include domestic and international wireless/mobile service providers, original equipment manufacturers, distributors, system integrators, as well as private network users such as public safety agencies, government institutions, and utility, pipeline, railroad and other industrial enterprises that operate broadband wireless networks. Our customers generally purchase a combination of our products and services as part of a multiple element arrangement. Our assessment of which revenue recognition guidance is appropriate to account for each element in an arrangement can involve significant judgment. Revenue from product sales is generated predominately from the sales of products manufactured by third party manufacturers to whom we have outsourced our manufacturing processes. In general, printed circuit assemblies, mechanical housings, and packaged modules are manufactured by contract manufacturing partners, with periodic business reviews of material levels and obsolescence. Product assembly, product testing, complete system integration and system testing may either be performed within our own facilities or at the locations of our third party manufacturers. 58 Revenue from services includes certain installation, extended warranty, customer support, consulting, training and education. It also can include certain revenue generated from the resale of equipment purchased on behalf of customers for installation service contracts we perform for customers. Such equipment may include towers, antennas, and other related materials. Revenue from warranty services are recognized ratably over the service period. Under our revenue recognition policy, revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria have been met: • Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. Contracts and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. • Delivery has occurred. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. • The fee is fixed or determinable. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. • Collectibility is reasonably assured. We assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history. We often enter into multiple contractual agreements with the same customer. Such agreements are reviewed to determine whether they should be evaluated as one arrangement. If an arrangement, other than a long-term contract, requires the delivery or performance of multiple deliverables or elements, we determine whether the individual elements represent “separate units of accounting”. Based on the terms and conditions of our typical product sales arrangement, we believe that our products and services can be accounted for as separate units because our products and services have value to our customers on a stand-alone basis. When a sale involves multiple deliverables, the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative selling price of each deliverable. When applying the relative selling price method, we determine the selling price for each deliverable using vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of selling price, if it exists, or third-party evidence (“TPE”) of selling price. If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exist for a deliverable, which is typically the case, we use our best estimate of selling price (“ESP”) for that deliverable. Revenue allocated to each element is then recognized when the other revenue recognition criteria are met for each element. Accordingly, services not yet performed at the time of product shipment are deferred based on their relative selling price and recognized as revenue as such services are performed. The relative selling price of any undelivered products is also deferred at the time of shipment and recognized as revenue when these products are delivered. There is generally no customer right of return in our sales agreements. The sequence for typical multiple element arrangements: we deliver our products, perform installation services and then provide post-contract support services. VSOE of fair value is based on the price charged when the element is sold separately. For multiple element arrangements, if VSOE cannot be established, we establish, where available, the selling price based on TPE. TPE is determined based on evidence of competitor pricing for similar deliverables when sold separately. When we cannot determine VSOE or TPE, which is typically the case, we use ESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would typically transact a stand-alone sale of the product or service. ESP is determined by considering a number of factors including our pricing policies, internal costs and gross margin objectives, method of distribution, information gathered from experience in customer negotiations, market research and information, recent technological trends, competitive landscape and geographies. The determination of ESP is approved by our management taking into consideration our pricing strategy. We regularly review VSOE, TPE and ESP and maintain internal controls over the establishment and updating of these estimates. For our proprietary and OEM products, we determine ESP using a discount off list methodology. Under this approach, reasonably available data points, including deals bid and won in the past rolling four quarters and competitor pricing data, for each part number are gathered. Then similar parts are grouped together and the average net price and the discount off the list price are calculated for each group of products. Since we have determined that pricing varies significantly by geography, the data is further stratified by geography. Within geographies, the data is stratified based on type of customer, distribution channel and estimated deal size or customer volume as larger opportunities with multiple deliverables bundled are more likely to receive preferential pricing. Based on all the available information (pricing practices and trends, competition, market, potential pricing limitations set by the competitors for the similar or identical product, functionality and expected technological life of the product, etc.), the final discount off list percentage is determined. Using the discount off list price percentage, the best estimated selling price for each product is determined. For services ESP, we also stratify data based on geography, type of customer and estimated deal size. For training and extended support services, we determine ESP using a discount off list methodology as discussed above. For technical Network management software products generally carry a 30-day to 90-day warranty from the date of customer acceptance. Our liability under these warranties is to provide a corrected copy of any portion of the software found not to be in substantial compliance with the agreed-upon specifications. We lease facilities and equipment under various operating leases. These lease agreements generally include rent escalation clauses, and many include renewal periods at our option. We recognize expense for scheduled rent increases on a straight-line basis over the lease term beginning with the date we take possession of the leased space. Leasehold improvements made either at the inception of the lease or during the lease term are amortized over the current lease term, Operating Leases or estimated life, if shorter. Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency of our subsidiaries located in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Mexico, Algeria and New Zealand is the U.S. dollar. Determination of the functional currency is dependent upon the economic environment in which an entity operates as well as the customers and suppliers the entity conducts business with. Changes in facts and circumstances may occur which could lead to a change in the functional currency of that entity. Accordingly, all of the monetary assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are re-measured into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate as of the applicable balance sheet date, and all non-monetary assets and liabilities are re-measured at historical rates. Income and expenses are re-measured at the average exchange rate prevailing during the period. Gains and losses resulting from the re-measurement of these subsidiaries’ financial statements are included in the consolidated statements of operations. Our other international subsidiaries use their respective local currency as their functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the local current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and income and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rates during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions and translation of monetary assets and liabilities in non-functional currencies are included in cost of product sales and services in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Net foreign exchange losses recorded in our consolidated statements of operations during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 totaled $0.8 million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Retirement Benefits As of June 27, 2014, we provided retirement benefits to substantially all employees primarily through our defined contribution retirement plans. These plans have matching and savings elements. Contributions by us to these retirement plans are based on profits and employees’ savings with no other funding requirements. We may make additional contributions to the plan at our discretion. However, effective from the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we halted making matching contributions to the plan for an indefinite period of time. Contributions to retirement plans are expensed as incurred. Retirement plan expense amounted to $2.5 million, $2.9 million and $2.8 million in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Revenue Recognition We generate substantially all of our revenue from the sales or licensing of our microwave radio and wireless access systems, network management software, and professional services including installation and commissioning and training. Principal customers for our products and services include domestic and international wireless/mobile service providers, original equipment manufacturers, distributors, system integrators, as well as private network users such as public safety agencies, government institutions, and utility, pipeline, railroad and other industrial enterprises that operate broadband wireless networks. Our customers generally purchase a combination of our products and services as part of a multiple element arrangement. Our assessment of which revenue recognition guidance is appropriate to account for each element in an arrangement can involve significant judgment. Revenue from product sales is generated predominately from the sales of products manufactured by third party manufacturers to whom we have outsourced our manufacturing processes. In general, printed circuit assemblies, mechanical housings, and packaged modules are manufactured by contract manufacturing partners, with periodic business reviews of material levels and obsolescence. Product assembly, product testing, complete system integration and system testing may either be performed within our own facilities or at the locations of our third party manufacturers. A n n u a l R e p o r t Revenue from services includes certain installation, extended warranty, customer support, consulting, training and education. It also can include certain revenue generated from the resale of equipment purchased on behalf of customers for installation service contracts we perform for customers. Such equipment may include towers, antennas, and other related materials. Revenue from warranty services are recognized ratably over the service period. Under our revenue recognition policy, revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria have been met: • Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. Contracts and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. • Delivery has occurred. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. • The fee is fixed or determinable. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. • Collectibility is reasonably assured. We assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history. We often enter into multiple contractual agreements with the same customer. Such agreements are reviewed to determine whether they should be evaluated as one arrangement. If an arrangement, other than a long-term contract, requires the delivery or performance of multiple deliverables or elements, we determine whether the individual elements represent “separate units of accounting”. Based on the terms and conditions of our typical product sales arrangement, we believe that our products and services can be accounted for as separate units because our products and services have value to our customers on a stand-alone basis. When a sale involves multiple deliverables, the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative selling price of each deliverable. When applying the relative selling price method, we determine the selling price for each deliverable using vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of selling price, if it exists, or third-party evidence (“TPE”) of selling price. If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exist for a deliverable, which is typically the case, we use our best estimate of selling price (“ESP”) for that deliverable. Revenue allocated to each element is then recognized when the other revenue recognition criteria are met for each element. Accordingly, services not yet performed at the time of product shipment are deferred based on their relative selling price and recognized as revenue as such services are performed. The relative selling price of any undelivered products is also deferred at the time of shipment and recognized as revenue when these products are delivered. There is generally no customer right of return in our sales agreements. The sequence for typical multiple element arrangements: we deliver our products, perform installation services and then provide post-contract support services. VSOE of fair value is based on the price charged when the element is sold separately. For multiple element arrangements, if VSOE cannot be established, we establish, where available, the selling price based on TPE. TPE is determined based on evidence of competitor pricing for similar deliverables when sold separately. When we cannot determine VSOE or TPE, which is typically the case, we use ESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would typically transact a stand-alone sale of the product or service. ESP is determined by considering a number of factors including our pricing policies, internal costs and gross margin objectives, method of distribution, information gathered from experience in customer negotiations, market research and information, recent technological trends, competitive landscape and geographies. The determination of ESP is approved by our management taking into consideration our pricing strategy. We regularly review VSOE, TPE and ESP and maintain internal controls over the establishment and updating of these estimates. For our proprietary and OEM products, we determine ESP using a discount off list methodology. Under this approach, reasonably available data points, including deals bid and won in the past rolling four quarters and competitor pricing data, for each part number are gathered. Then similar parts are grouped together and the average net price and the discount off the list price are calculated for each group of products. Since we have determined that pricing varies significantly by geography, the data is further stratified by geography. Within geographies, the data is stratified based on type of customer, distribution channel and estimated deal size or customer volume as larger opportunities with multiple deliverables bundled are more likely to receive preferential pricing. Based on all the available information (pricing practices and trends, competition, market, potential pricing limitations set by the competitors for the similar or identical product, functionality and expected technological life of the product, etc.), the final discount off list percentage is determined. Using the discount off list price percentage, the best estimated selling price for each product is determined. For services ESP, we also stratify data based on geography, type of customer and estimated deal size. For training and extended support services, we determine ESP using a discount off list methodology as discussed above. For technical 59 t r o p e R l a u n n A and installation services, we determine ESP using an estimated margin methodology. Under this methodology, ESP’s are determined based on estimated margins anticipated. We consider historical margins as well as current pricing trends and market conditions when determining the estimated margin. Some of our products have both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality. Accordingly, these products are not within the scope of the software revenue recognition rules, ASC 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition. In addition to the software in our core microwave product which is not within the scope of the software revenue recognition rules, some of our sales arrangements have multiple deliverables containing software and related software support components. Such sale arrangements are subject to the accounting guidance in ASC 985-605, Software-Revenue Recognition. Under the software revenue recognition guidance, we use the residual method to recognize revenue when a multiple element arrangement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and VSOE of all undelivered elements exists. If VSOE cannot be established for the undelivered elements of an arrangement, we defer revenue until the earlier of delivery, or fair value of the undelivered element exists, unless the undelivered element is a service, in which the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the period during which the services are expected to be performed. Revenues related to long-term contracts for customized network solutions are recognized using the percentage-of- completion method. In using the percentage-of-completion method, we generally apply the cost-to-cost method of accounting where sales and profits are recorded based on the ratio of costs incurred to estimated total costs at completion. Contracts are combined when specific aggregation criteria are met including when the contracts are in substance an arrangement to perform a single project with a customer; the contracts are negotiated as a package in the same economic environment with an overall profit objective; the contracts require interrelated activities with common costs that cannot be separately identified with, or reasonably allocated to the elements, phases or units of output and the contracts are performed concurrently or in a continuous sequence under the same project management at the same location or at different locations in the same general vicinity. Recognition of profit on long-term contracts requires estimates of the total contract value, the total cost at completion and the measurement of progress towards completion. Significant judgment is required when estimating total contract costs and progress to completion on the arrangements as well as whether a loss is expected to be incurred on the contract. Amounts representing contract change orders, claims or other items are included in sales only when they can be reliably estimated and realization is probable. When adjustments in contract value or estimated costs are determined, any changes from prior estimates are reflected in earnings in the current period. Anticipated losses on contracts or programs in progress are charged to earnings when identified. Royalty income is recognized on the basis of terms specified in the contractual agreements. Cost of Product Sales and Services Cost of sales consists primarily of materials, labor and overhead costs incurred internally and amounts incurred to contract manufacturers to produce our products, personnel and other implementation costs incurred to install our products and train customer personnel, and customer service and third party original equipment manufacturer costs to provide continuing support to our customers. Also included in cost of sales is the amortization of purchased technology intangible assets. Shipping and handling costs are included as a component of costs of product sales in our consolidated statements of operations because we include in revenue the related costs that we bill our customers. Presentation of Transactional Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Government Authorities We present transactional taxes such as sales and use tax collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a net basis. Share-Based Compensation We have issued stock options, restricted stock and performance shares under our 2007 Stock Equity Plan and have assumed stock options from the acquisition of Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”). We estimate the grant date fair value of our share-based awards and amortize this fair value to compensation expense over the requisite service period or vesting term. To estimate the fair value of our stock option awards, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The determination of the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by 60 our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. Due to the inherent limitations of option valuation models, including consideration of future events that are unpredictable and the estimation process utilized in determining the valuation of the share-based awards, the ultimate value realized by our employees may vary significantly from the amounts expensed in our financial statements. For restricted stock and performance share awards, we measure the grant date fair value based upon the market price of our common stock on the date of the grant. We generally recognize compensation cost for share-based payment awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For awards with a performance condition vesting feature, we recognize share-based compensation costs for the performance awards when achievement of the performance conditions is considered probable. Any previously recognized compensation cost would be reversed if the performance condition is not satisfied or if it is not probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ significantly from initial estimates. Share-based compensation expense is recorded net of estimated forfeitures such that expense was recorded only for those share-based awards that are expected to vest. Cash flows, if any, resulting from the gross benefit of tax deductions related to share-based compensation in excess of the grant date fair value of the related share-based awards are presented as part of cash flows from financing activities. This amount is shown as a reduction to cash flows from operating activities and an increase to cash flow from financing activities. Net Income (Loss) per Share of Common Stock We compute net income (loss) per share of common stock using the two-class method. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and participating securities outstanding. Our unvested restricted shares (including restricted stock awards and performance share awards) contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends and therefore are considered to be participating securities and would be included in the calculations of net income per basic and diluted common share. However, we incurred a net loss in all periods presented. In accordance with ASC subtopic 260-10, undistributed losses are not allocated to unvested restricted shares due to the fact that the unvested restricted shares are not contractually obligated to share in the losses of the company. Restructuring Charges Our restructuring charges represent expenses incurred in connection with certain cost reduction programs that we have implemented, and consist of the costs of employee termination benefits, facilities charges and other costs of exiting activities or geographies. A liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity is measured at its fair value when the liability is incurred. Expenses for one-time termination benefits are recognized at the date we notify the employee, unless the employee must provide future service, in which case the benefits are expensed ratably over the future service period. We recognize severance benefits provided as part of an ongoing benefit arrangement when the payment is probable and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. Liabilities related to an operating lease/contract are measured and recognized at fair value when the contract does not have any future economic benefit to the entity and the fair value of the liability is determined based on the present value of the remaining lease obligations, adjusted for the effects of deferred items recognized under the lease, and reduced by estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably obtained for the property. The assumptions in determining such estimates include anticipated timing of sublease rentals and estimates of sublease rental receipts and related costs based on market conditions. We expense all other costs related to an exit or disposal activity as incurred. Research and Development Costs period in which they are incurred. Recently Issued Accounting Standards Our sponsored research and development costs, which include costs in connection with new product development, improvement of existing products, process improvement, and product use technologies, are charged to operations in the On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for us beginning in our fiscal year and installation services, we determine ESP using an estimated margin methodology. Under this methodology, ESP’s are determined based on estimated margins anticipated. We consider historical margins as well as current pricing trends and market conditions when determining the estimated margin. Some of our products have both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality. Accordingly, these products are not within the scope of the software revenue recognition rules, ASC 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition. In addition to the software in our core microwave product which is not within the scope of the software revenue recognition rules, some of our sales arrangements have multiple deliverables containing software and related software support components. Such sale arrangements are subject to the accounting guidance in ASC 985-605, Software-Revenue Recognition. Under the software revenue recognition guidance, we use the residual method to recognize revenue when a multiple element arrangement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and VSOE of all undelivered elements exists. If VSOE cannot be established for the undelivered elements of an arrangement, we defer revenue until the earlier of delivery, or fair value of the undelivered element exists, unless the undelivered element is a service, in which the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the period during which the services are expected to be performed. Revenues related to long-term contracts for customized network solutions are recognized using the percentage-of- completion method. In using the percentage-of-completion method, we generally apply the cost-to-cost method of accounting where sales and profits are recorded based on the ratio of costs incurred to estimated total costs at completion. Contracts are combined when specific aggregation criteria are met including when the contracts are in substance an arrangement to perform a single project with a customer; the contracts are negotiated as a package in the same economic environment with an overall profit objective; the contracts require interrelated activities with common costs that cannot be separately identified with, or reasonably allocated to the elements, phases or units of output and the contracts are performed concurrently or in a continuous sequence under the same project management at the same location or at different locations in the same general vicinity. Recognition of profit on long-term contracts requires estimates of the total contract value, the total cost at completion and the measurement of progress towards completion. Significant judgment is required when estimating total contract costs and progress to completion on the arrangements as well as whether a loss is expected to be incurred on the contract. Amounts representing contract change orders, claims or other items are included in sales only when they can be reliably estimated and realization is probable. When adjustments in contract value or estimated costs are determined, any changes from prior estimates are reflected in earnings in the current period. Anticipated losses on contracts or programs in progress are charged to earnings when identified. Royalty income is recognized on the basis of terms specified in the contractual agreements. Cost of Product Sales and Services Cost of sales consists primarily of materials, labor and overhead costs incurred internally and amounts incurred to contract manufacturers to produce our products, personnel and other implementation costs incurred to install our products and train customer personnel, and customer service and third party original equipment manufacturer costs to provide continuing support to our customers. Also included in cost of sales is the amortization of purchased technology intangible assets. Shipping and handling costs are included as a component of costs of product sales in our consolidated statements of operations because we include in revenue the related costs that we bill our customers. Presentation of Transactional Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Government Authorities authorities on a net basis. Share-Based Compensation We have issued stock options, restricted stock and performance shares under our 2007 Stock Equity Plan and have assumed stock options from the acquisition of Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”). We estimate the grant date fair value of our share-based awards and amortize this fair value to compensation expense over the requisite service period or vesting term. To estimate the fair value of our stock option awards, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The determination of the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. Due to the inherent limitations of option valuation models, including consideration of future events that are unpredictable and the estimation process utilized in determining the valuation of the share-based awards, the ultimate value realized by our employees may vary significantly from the amounts expensed in our financial statements. For restricted stock and performance share awards, we measure the grant date fair value based upon the market price of our common stock on the date of the grant. We generally recognize compensation cost for share-based payment awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For awards with a performance condition vesting feature, we recognize share-based compensation costs for the performance awards when achievement of the performance conditions is considered probable. Any previously recognized compensation cost would be reversed if the performance condition is not satisfied or if it is not probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ significantly from initial estimates. Share-based compensation expense is recorded net of estimated forfeitures such that expense was recorded only for those share-based awards that are expected to vest. Cash flows, if any, resulting from the gross benefit of tax deductions related to share-based compensation in excess of the grant date fair value of the related share-based awards are presented as part of cash flows from financing activities. This amount is shown as a reduction to cash flows from operating activities and an increase to cash flow from financing activities. Net Income (Loss) per Share of Common Stock We compute net income (loss) per share of common stock using the two-class method. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and participating securities outstanding. Our unvested restricted shares (including restricted stock awards and performance share awards) contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends and therefore are considered to be participating securities and would be included in the calculations of net income per basic and diluted common share. However, we incurred a net loss in all periods presented. In accordance with ASC subtopic 260-10, undistributed losses are not allocated to unvested restricted shares due to the fact that the unvested restricted shares are not contractually obligated to share in the losses of the company. Restructuring Charges Our restructuring charges represent expenses incurred in connection with certain cost reduction programs that we have implemented, and consist of the costs of employee termination benefits, facilities charges and other costs of exiting activities or geographies. A liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity is measured at its fair value when the liability is incurred. Expenses for one-time termination benefits are recognized at the date we notify the employee, unless the employee must provide future service, in which case the benefits are expensed ratably over the future service period. We recognize severance benefits provided as part of an ongoing benefit arrangement when the payment is probable and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. Liabilities related to an operating lease/contract are measured and recognized at fair value when the contract does not have any future economic benefit to the entity and the fair value of the liability is determined based on the present value of the remaining lease obligations, adjusted for the effects of deferred items recognized under the lease, and reduced by estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably obtained for the property. The assumptions in determining such estimates include anticipated timing of sublease rentals and estimates of sublease rental receipts and related costs based on market conditions. We expense all other costs related to an exit or disposal activity as incurred. A n n u a l R e p o r t We present transactional taxes such as sales and use tax collected from customers and remitted to governmental Research and Development Costs Our sponsored research and development costs, which include costs in connection with new product development, improvement of existing products, process improvement, and product use technologies, are charged to operations in the period in which they are incurred. Recently Issued Accounting Standards On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for us beginning in our fiscal year 61 t r o p e R l a u n n A 2018. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. In July 2013, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforward exists. This new guidance requires entities, if certain criteria are met, to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward when such items exist in the same taxing jurisdiction. This new guidance is to be adopted prospectively and is effective for us beginning in our first quarter of fiscal 2015. The adoption of this standard will have no effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. Note 2. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss The changes in components of our accumulated other comprehensive loss during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows: Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment (“CTA”) Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Hedging Derivatives (In millions) Balance as of July 1, 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Foreign currency translation gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (2.6) $ (1.4) — (4.0) 0.6 — (3.4) 0.5 — (2.9) $ (0.1) $ — 0.1 — — 0.1 0.1 — (0.1) — $ (2.7) (1.4) 0.1 (4.0) 0.6 0.1 (3.3) 0.5 (0.1) (2.9) Note 3. Net Loss per Share of Common Stock As we incurred net loss for all periods in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, all potential dilutive securities from stock options, restricted stocks and units and performance shares and units have been excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculations, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. The following table summarizes the potential weighted average shares of common stock outstanding that have been excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculations: Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stocks and units and performance shares and units. . . . . . . . . Total potential shares of common stock excluded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 Fiscal Year 2013 (In millions) 5.0 1.2 6.2 7.3 0.4 7.7 2012 5.0 2.0 7.0 62 Note 4. Balance Sheet Components Receivables, net Our net receivables are summarized below: Accounts receivable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Less: allowances for collection losses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories Our inventories are summarized below: Finished products. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Work in process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raw materials and supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred cost of sales included within finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Consigned inventories included within raw materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 (In millions) 84.6 (7.4) 77.2 $ $ 96.5 (10.2) 86.3 June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 (In millions) 25.3 $ 5.3 7.5 38.1 3.2 6.6 $ $ $ 22.3 3.9 8.8 35.0 3.1 7.9 $ $ During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recorded charges to adjust our inventory and customer service inventory to the lower of cost or market. These charges were primarily due to excess and obsolete inventory resulting from product transitioning and discontinuance or customer insolvency. Such charges incurred during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 were classified in cost of product sales as follows: Excess and obsolete inventory charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer service inventory write-downs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2012 Fiscal Year 2013 (In millions) $ $ $ $ 4.0 3.2 7.2 2.1% $ $ 4.0 1.5 5.5 1.2% 3.1 1.7 4.8 1.1% During fiscal 2013, we also incurred $4.2 million charges to write down deferred costs of revenue that were unlikely to derive revenue due to disposition of our WiMAX business. The charges were included in discontinued operations in our consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2013. 2018. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. In July 2013, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance on the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforward exists. This new guidance requires entities, if certain criteria are met, to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward when such items exist in the same taxing jurisdiction. This new guidance is to be adopted prospectively and is effective for us beginning in our first quarter of fiscal 2015. The adoption of this standard will have no effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. Note 2. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss as follows: The changes in components of our accumulated other comprehensive loss during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 were Note 4. Balance Sheet Components Receivables, net Our net receivables are summarized below: Accounts receivable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Less: allowances for collection losses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Inventories Our inventories are summarized below: Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment (“CTA”) Accumulated Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Hedging Derivatives (In millions) Finished products. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Work in process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raw materials and supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 $ (In millions) 84.6 (7.4) 77.2 $ 96.5 (10.2) 86.3 June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 $ (In millions) 25.3 5.3 7.5 38.1 $ 22.3 3.9 8.8 35.0 3.1 7.9 A n n u a l R e p o r t Deferred cost of sales included within finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Consigned inventories included within raw materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.2 6.6 $ $ During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recorded charges to adjust our inventory and customer service inventory to the lower of cost or market. These charges were primarily due to excess and obsolete inventory resulting from product transitioning and discontinuance or customer insolvency. Such charges incurred during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 were classified in cost of product sales as follows: Excess and obsolete inventory charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer service inventory write-downs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As % of revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 Fiscal Year 2013 2012 $ $ $ $ (In millions) 4.0 1.5 5.5 1.2% $ $ 4.0 3.2 7.2 2.1% 3.1 1.7 4.8 1.1% During fiscal 2013, we also incurred $4.2 million charges to write down deferred costs of revenue that were unlikely to derive revenue due to disposition of our WiMAX business. The charges were included in discontinued operations in our consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2013. 63 Balance as of July 1, 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (2.6) $ (0.1) $ Foreign currency translation gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1.4) — (4.0) (3.4) 0.6 — 0.5 — Balance as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (2.9) $ — 0.1 — — 0.1 0.1 — (0.1) — $ Note 3. Net Loss per Share of Common Stock As we incurred net loss for all periods in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, all potential dilutive securities from stock options, restricted stocks and units and performance shares and units have been excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculations, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. The following table summarizes the potential weighted average shares of common stock outstanding that have been excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculations: Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stocks and units and performance shares and units. . . . . . . . . Total potential shares of common stock excluded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2012 Fiscal Year 2013 (In millions) 5.0 1.2 6.2 7.3 0.4 7.7 (2.7) (1.4) 0.1 (4.0) 0.6 0.1 (3.3) 0.5 (0.1) (2.9) 5.0 2.0 7.0 Property, Plant and Equipment, net Our property, plant and equipment are summarized below: June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 Land. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Buildings and leasehold improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Software. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ (In millions) 0.7 10.3 13.2 47.1 71.3 (42.0) 29.3 $ 0.7 10.6 12.1 48.8 72.2 (43.4) 28.8 Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment, including amortization of internal use software , was $7.1 million, $5.6 million and $4.9 million, respectively, in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012. Accrued Warranties We accrue for the estimated cost to repair or replace products under warranty. Changes in our warranty liability, which is included as a component of other accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets, during fiscal 2014 and 2013 were as follows: Fiscal Year 2014 2013 t r o p e R l a u n n A Balance as of the beginning of the fiscal year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Warranty provision recorded during the period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consumption during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of the end of the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ (In millions) 3.3 5.2 (4.7) 3.8 $ 3.0 5.8 (5.5) 3.3 Note 5. Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities We determine fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal market (or most advantageous market, in the absence of a principal market) for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. We try to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in measuring fair value and establish a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows: • Level 1 — Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; • Level 2 — Observable market-based inputs or observable inputs that are corroborated by market data; and • Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions. The carrying amounts, estimated fair values and valuation input levels of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 were as follows: 64 June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 Carrying Amount Fair Value Fair Value Valuation Inputs Carrying Amount (In millions) Assets: Cash equivalents: Other current assets: Liabilities: Other accrued expenses: Bank certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Money market funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.5 10.2 $ $ 3.5 10.2 $ $ 2.4 39.2 2.4 39.2 Level 2 Level 1 Foreign exchange forward contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ — $ 0.1 0.1 Level 2 $ $ $ Foreign exchange forward contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ — $ 0.1 $ 0.1 Level 2 We classify investments within Level 1 if quoted prices are available in active markets. Our Level 1 items include shares in money market funds purchased from two major financial institutions. As of June 27, 2014, these money market shares were valued at $1.00 net asset value per share by these financial institutions. We classify items in Level 2 if the observable inputs to quoted market prices, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources are available with reasonable levels of price transparency. Our bank certificates of deposit and foreign exchange forward contracts are classified within Level 2. Foreign currency forward contracts are measured at fair value using observable foreign currency exchange rates. Our policy is to recognize asset or liability transfers among Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 as of the actual date of the events or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, we had no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy of our assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Note 6. Credit Facility and Debt On March 28, 2014, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (the "SVB Credit Facility"). This agreement amends and restates our existing First Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, which was entered into on September 27, 2013 and amended on October 29, 2013, November 20, 2013 and February 10, 2014, respectively, providing for certain amendments to the maximum borrowing limit and financial covenants. On September 27, 2013, we repaid the remaining $1.7 million outstanding balance of the original $8.3 million two-year term loan that we borrowed on January 30, 2012. As of June 27, 2014, our outstanding debt under the SVB Credit Facility consisted of the $6.0 million borrowings that we advanced under a previous SVB credit facility in fiscal 2011. The SVB Credit Facility provides for a committed amount of up to $40.0 million, decreased from the $50.0 million credit limit under the first amended and restated credit facility, with a $30.0 million sublimit that can be borrowed by our Singapore subsidiary. Borrowings may be advanced under the SVB Credit Facility at the lesser of $40.0 million or a borrowing base equal to a specified percentage of the value of eligible accounts receivable and U.S. unbilled accounts of the Company, subject to certain reserves and eligibility criteria. The SVB Credit Facility can also be utilized to issue letters of credit. Principal, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, is due and payable on September 26, 2016. We may prepay loans under the SVB Credit Facility in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. As of June 27, 2014, available credit under the SVB Credit Facility was $19.7 million reflecting the calculated borrowing base of $31.4 million less existing borrowings of $6.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $5.7 million. Borrowings under the SVB Credit Facility carry an interest rate computed at the daily prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal plus a spread of 0.50% to 1.50%, with such spread determined based on our adjusted quick ratio. If a minimum adjusted quick ratio requirement is satisfied, LIBOR advances are offered at LIBOR plus a spread of 2.75%. Interest is due and payable in arrears monthly for prime rate loans and, for LIBOR rate loans, at the end of an interest period or at each three-month interval if the interest period is greater than three months. During fiscal 2014, the weighted average interest rate on our $6.0 million loan was 3.38%. The previous $8.3 million two-year term loan bore a fixed interest rate of 5% per annum. Property, Plant and Equipment, net Our property, plant and equipment are summarized below: Land. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Buildings and leasehold improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Software. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 (In millions) 0.7 $ 10.3 13.2 47.1 71.3 0.7 10.6 12.1 48.8 72.2 (43.4) 28.8 (42.0) 29.3 $ $ Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment, including amortization of internal use software , was $7.1 million, $5.6 million and $4.9 million, respectively, in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012. Accrued Warranties 2013 were as follows: We accrue for the estimated cost to repair or replace products under warranty. Changes in our warranty liability, which is included as a component of other accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets, during fiscal 2014 and Balance as of the beginning of the fiscal year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Warranty provision recorded during the period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consumption during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of the end of the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.8 $ 2014 2013 Fiscal Year (In millions) $ 3.3 5.2 (4.7) 3.0 5.8 (5.5) 3.3 Note 5. Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities We determine fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal market (or most advantageous market, in the absence of a principal market) for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. We try to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in measuring fair value and establish a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows: • Level 1 — Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; • Level 2 — Observable market-based inputs or observable inputs that are corroborated by market data; and • Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions. The carrying amounts, estimated fair values and valuation input levels of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 were as follows: June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount (In millions) Fair Value Valuation Inputs Assets: Cash equivalents: Bank certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Money market funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Other current assets: Foreign exchange forward contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Liabilities: Other accrued expenses: Foreign exchange forward contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.5 10.2 $ $ 3.5 10.2 $ $ 2.4 39.2 — $ — $ 0.1 $ $ $ 2.4 39.2 Level 2 Level 1 0.1 Level 2 — $ — $ 0.1 $ 0.1 Level 2 We classify investments within Level 1 if quoted prices are available in active markets. Our Level 1 items include shares in money market funds purchased from two major financial institutions. As of June 27, 2014, these money market shares were valued at $1.00 net asset value per share by these financial institutions. We classify items in Level 2 if the observable inputs to quoted market prices, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources are available with reasonable levels of price transparency. Our bank certificates of deposit and foreign exchange forward contracts are classified within Level 2. Foreign currency forward contracts are measured at fair value using observable foreign currency exchange rates. Our policy is to recognize asset or liability transfers among Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 as of the actual date of the events or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, we had no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy of our assets or liabilities measured at fair value. A n n u a l R e p o r t Note 6. Credit Facility and Debt On March 28, 2014, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (the "SVB Credit Facility"). This agreement amends and restates our existing First Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, which was entered into on September 27, 2013 and amended on October 29, 2013, November 20, 2013 and February 10, 2014, respectively, providing for certain amendments to the maximum borrowing limit and financial covenants. On September 27, 2013, we repaid the remaining $1.7 million outstanding balance of the original $8.3 million two-year term loan that we borrowed on January 30, 2012. As of June 27, 2014, our outstanding debt under the SVB Credit Facility consisted of the $6.0 million borrowings that we advanced under a previous SVB credit facility in fiscal 2011. The SVB Credit Facility provides for a committed amount of up to $40.0 million, decreased from the $50.0 million credit limit under the first amended and restated credit facility, with a $30.0 million sublimit that can be borrowed by our Singapore subsidiary. Borrowings may be advanced under the SVB Credit Facility at the lesser of $40.0 million or a borrowing base equal to a specified percentage of the value of eligible accounts receivable and U.S. unbilled accounts of the Company, subject to certain reserves and eligibility criteria. The SVB Credit Facility can also be utilized to issue letters of credit. Principal, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, is due and payable on September 26, 2016. We may prepay loans under the SVB Credit Facility in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty. As of June 27, 2014, available credit under the SVB Credit Facility was $19.7 million reflecting the calculated borrowing base of $31.4 million less existing borrowings of $6.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $5.7 million. Borrowings under the SVB Credit Facility carry an interest rate computed at the daily prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal plus a spread of 0.50% to 1.50%, with such spread determined based on our adjusted quick ratio. If a minimum adjusted quick ratio requirement is satisfied, LIBOR advances are offered at LIBOR plus a spread of 2.75%. Interest is due and payable in arrears monthly for prime rate loans and, for LIBOR rate loans, at the end of an interest period or at each three-month interval if the interest period is greater than three months. During fiscal 2014, the weighted average interest rate on our $6.0 million loan was 3.38%. The previous $8.3 million two-year term loan bore a fixed interest rate of 5% per annum. 65 The SVB Credit Facility contains quarterly financial covenants including minimum adjusted quick ratio and minimum profitability (EBITDA) requirements. In the event our adjusted quick ratio falls below a certain level, cash received in our accounts with SVB may be directly applied to reduce outstanding obligations under the credit facility. The SVB Credit Facility also imposes certain restrictions on our ability to dispose of assets, permit a change in control, merge or consolidate, make acquisitions, incur indebtedness, grant liens, make investments, make certain restricted payments and enter into transactions with affiliates under certain circumstances. Certain of our assets, including accounts receivable, inventory, and equipment, are pledged as collateral for the SVB Credit Facility. Upon an event of default, outstanding obligations would be immediately due and payable. Under certain circumstances, a default interest rate will apply on all obligations during the existence of an event of default at a per annum rate of interest equal to 2.00% above the applicable interest rate. As of June 27, 2014, we were in compliance with the quarterly financial covenants contained in the SVB Credit Facility. However, as a result of the uncertainty on our ability to meet the financial covenants and the fact that the SVB Credit Facility contains subjective acceleration clauses that could be triggered by the lender, the $6.0 million borrowing was classified as a current liability as of June 27, 2014. Note 7. Divestiture t r o p e R l a u n n A In March 2011, our board of directors approved a plan for the sale of our WiMAX business. On September 2, 2011, we sold to EION Networks, Inc. (“EION”) our WiMAX business and related assets consisting of certain technology, inventory and equipment. As consideration for the sale of assets, EION agreed to pay us $0.4 million in cash and up to $2.8 million in additional cash payments contingent upon specific factors related to future WiMAX business performance. As of June 27, 2014, we had received $0.1 million of such contingent payments and do not expect any further payments from EION. EION is entitled to receive cash payments up to $2.0 million upon collections of certain WiMAX accounts receivable, of which $1.6 million has been paid by us to EION and $0.3 million was written off resulting from the write-down of the corresponding WiMAX accounts receivable as of June 27, 2014. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, our accrued liabilities related to the disposition of WiMAX business were $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. In the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we began accounting for the WiMAX business as a discontinued operation and, therefore, the operating results of our WiMAX business were included in discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements for all years presented. The loss incurred in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to write-down of certain WiMAX deferred cost of sales that were not transferred to EION and certain expenses we incurred to support a remaining customer obligation. The income recognized in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to the recovery of certain WiMAX customer receivables that was previously written down. We recognized a $0.4 million gain and a $1.9 million loss on disposition, which was included in our loss from discontinued operations, in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. Summary results of operations for the WiMAX business were as follows: Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 Revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Income (loss) from operations of WiMAX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain (loss) on disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ (In millions) 0.1 (4.3) 0.4 (0.2) (4.1) $ — $ 1.2 — (0.3) 0.9 $ 1.6 (6.5) (1.9) (0.2) (8.6) Note 9. Restructuring Activities Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan Note 8. Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets Goodwill Our goodwill for fiscal 2012 resulted from our acquisition of Telsima Corporation in fiscal 2009, which was accounted for as a purchase business combination. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows: During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, in line with the decrease in revenue that we experienced and our reduced forecast for the immediate future, we initiated a restructuring plan (the “Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan”) to reduce our operating costs, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan primarily include reductions in force and additional downsizing of our Santa Clara, California headquarters. The following table summarizes our costs incurred during fiscal 2014, estimated additional costs to be incurred and estimated total costs expected to be incurred as of June 27, 2014 under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan: 66 Balance as of July 1, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Goodwill impairment charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.6 (5.6) — In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we concluded that a goodwill impairment indicator existed due to a significant decline in our market capitalization. Therefore we performed a goodwill impairment analysis and recorded a $5.6 million goodwill impairment charge in the quarter. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, we did not have any goodwill in our Amount (In millions) consolidated balance sheets. Identifiable Intangible Assets A summary of our identifiable intangible assets is presented below: Purchased Technology Customer Relationships (In millions) Total Identifiable Intangible Assets Net identifiable intangible assets as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.2 $ Less: amortization expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net identifiable intangible assets as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: amortization expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net identifiable intangible assets as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ Amortization expenses: Fiscal 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ Fiscal 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fiscal 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Weighted average estimated useful life (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.6 $ (0.6) — — $ $ 0.6 0.7 3.0 (0.4) 0.8 (0.4) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 5.0 $ $ $ $ 1.8 (1.0) 0.8 (0.4) 0.4 0.4 1.0 2.3 Our identifiable intangible assets are being amortized over their useful estimated economic lives, which range from At June 27, 2014, we estimate our future amortization of identifiable intangible assets with definite lives by year as one to five years. follows: Fiscal Year 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Amount (In millions) $ 0.4 0.4 The SVB Credit Facility contains quarterly financial covenants including minimum adjusted quick ratio and minimum profitability (EBITDA) requirements. In the event our adjusted quick ratio falls below a certain level, cash received in our accounts with SVB may be directly applied to reduce outstanding obligations under the credit facility. The SVB Credit Facility also imposes certain restrictions on our ability to dispose of assets, permit a change in control, merge or consolidate, make acquisitions, incur indebtedness, grant liens, make investments, make certain restricted payments and enter into transactions with affiliates under certain circumstances. Certain of our assets, including accounts receivable, inventory, and equipment, are pledged as collateral for the SVB Credit Facility. Upon an event of default, outstanding obligations would be immediately due and payable. Under certain circumstances, a default interest rate will apply on all obligations during the existence of an event of default at a per annum rate of interest equal to 2.00% above the applicable interest rate. As of June 27, 2014, we were in compliance with the quarterly financial covenants contained in the SVB Credit Facility. However, as a result of the uncertainty on our ability to meet the financial covenants and the fact that the SVB Credit Facility contains subjective acceleration clauses that could be triggered by the lender, the $6.0 million borrowing was classified as a current liability as of June 27, 2014. Note 7. Divestiture In March 2011, our board of directors approved a plan for the sale of our WiMAX business. On September 2, 2011, we sold to EION Networks, Inc. (“EION”) our WiMAX business and related assets consisting of certain technology, inventory and equipment. As consideration for the sale of assets, EION agreed to pay us $0.4 million in cash and up to $2.8 million in additional cash payments contingent upon specific factors related to future WiMAX business performance. As of June 27, 2014, we had received $0.1 million of such contingent payments and do not expect any further payments from EION. EION is entitled to receive cash payments up to $2.0 million upon collections of certain WiMAX accounts receivable, of which $1.6 million has been paid by us to EION and $0.3 million was written off resulting from the write-down of the corresponding WiMAX accounts receivable as of June 27, 2014. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, our accrued liabilities related to the disposition of WiMAX business were $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. In the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we began accounting for the WiMAX business as a discontinued operation and, therefore, the operating results of our WiMAX business were included in discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements for all years presented. The loss incurred in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to write-down of certain WiMAX deferred cost of sales that were not transferred to EION and certain expenses we incurred to support a remaining customer obligation. The income recognized in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to the recovery of certain WiMAX customer receivables that was previously written down. We recognized a $0.4 million gain and a $1.9 million loss on disposition, which was included in our loss from discontinued operations, in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. Summary results of operations for the WiMAX business were as follows: Revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ 0.1 $ Income (loss) from operations of WiMAX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain (loss) on disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 — (0.3) (4.3) 0.4 (0.2) Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.9 $ (4.1) $ 1.6 (6.5) (1.9) (0.2) (8.6) 2014 2013 2012 Fiscal Year (In millions) Note 8. Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets Goodwill Our goodwill for fiscal 2012 resulted from our acquisition of Telsima Corporation in fiscal 2009, which was accounted for as a purchase business combination. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows: Balance as of July 1, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Goodwill impairment charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.6 (5.6) — In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we concluded that a goodwill impairment indicator existed due to a significant decline in our market capitalization. Therefore we performed a goodwill impairment analysis and recorded a $5.6 million goodwill impairment charge in the quarter. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, we did not have any goodwill in our consolidated balance sheets. Amount (In millions) Identifiable Intangible Assets A summary of our identifiable intangible assets is presented below: Purchased Technology Customer Relationships (In millions) Total Identifiable Intangible Assets Net identifiable intangible assets as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Less: amortization expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net identifiable intangible assets as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: amortization expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net identifiable intangible assets as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Amortization expenses: Fiscal 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fiscal 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fiscal 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Weighted average estimated useful life (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.6 (0.6) — — — $ — $ $ 0.6 0.7 $ 3.0 $ $ $ $ $ 1.2 (0.4) 0.8 (0.4) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 5.0 A n n u a l R e p o r t 1.8 (1.0) 0.8 (0.4) 0.4 0.4 1.0 2.3 Our identifiable intangible assets are being amortized over their useful estimated economic lives, which range from one to five years. At June 27, 2014, we estimate our future amortization of identifiable intangible assets with definite lives by year as follows: Fiscal Year Amount (In millions) 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 0.4 0.4 Note 9. Restructuring Activities Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, in line with the decrease in revenue that we experienced and our reduced forecast for the immediate future, we initiated a restructuring plan (the “Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan”) to reduce our operating costs, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan primarily include reductions in force and additional downsizing of our Santa Clara, California headquarters. The following table summarizes our costs incurred during fiscal 2014, estimated additional costs to be incurred and estimated total costs expected to be incurred as of June 27, 2014 under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan: 67 Costs Incurred During Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 Cumulative Costs Incurred Through June 27, 2014 Estimated Additional Costs to be Incurred Total Restructuring Costs Expected to be Incurred Restructuring Liabilities The information in the following table summarizes our restructuring activities during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 and restructuring liability as of June 27, 2014: t r o p e R l a u n n A Severance and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Facilities and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total for Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.4 0.4 5.8 $ $ (in millions) 5.4 0.4 5.8 $ $ 1.1 1.7 2.8 $ $ 6.5 2.1 8.6 During fiscal 2014, our severance and benefits charges under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan primarily related to reductions in force in Santa Clara, California, and several international locations. We intend to substantially complete the remaining restructuring activities under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2015. Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we initiated a restructuring plan (the “Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan”) to bring our cost structure in line with the changing business environment of the worldwide microwave radio and telecommunication markets, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan include the downsizing of our Santa Clara, California headquarters and certain international field offices, and reductions in force to reduce our operating expenses. The following table summarizes our costs incurred during fiscal 2014 and 2013, estimated additional costs to be incurred and estimated total costs expected to be incurred as of June 27, 2014 under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan: Costs Incurred During Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 Severance and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . $ Facilities and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total for Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan . . . $ 1.0 4.3 5.3 $ $ 1.8 — 1.8 Cumulative Costs Incurred Through June 27, 2014 (in millions) 2.8 4.3 7.1 $ $ Estimated Additional Costs to be Incurred Total Restructuring Costs Expected to be Incurred $ $ — $ 0.7 0.7 $ 2.8 5.0 7.8 During fiscal 2014 and 2013, our severance and benefits charges under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan primarily related to reductions in force in Santa Clara, California and several international locations of their finance and engineering functions. Facilities and other charges in of fiscal 2014 included obligations under a non-cancelable lease for facilities that we ceased to use at our Santa Clara, California headquarters and certain U.S. and international field offices. As of June 27, 2014, we completed a majority of the restructuring activities under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan. Fiscal 2011 Plan During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we initiated a restructuring plan (the “Fiscal 2011 Plan”) to reduce our operational costs. The Fiscal 2011 Plan was intended to bring our cost structure in line with the changing dynamics of the worldwide microwave radio and telecommunication markets, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2011 Plan included reductions in force to reduce our operating expenses and the downsizing or closure of our Morrisville, North Carolina, Santa Clara, California, Montreal, Canada and certain international field offices. The initiatives under the Fiscal 2011 Plan were completed in fiscal 2013. The following table summarizes our costs incurred during fiscal 2013 and 2012 and total costs incurred under the Fiscal 2011 Plan: meeting. Costs Incurred During Fiscal Year Ended June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 Cumulative Costs Incurred Through June 28, 2013 Restructuring liability as of July 1, 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ Provision related to Fiscal 2011 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3.1) (2.0) (5.1) Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2.1) (0.5) (2.6) Restructuring liability as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision related to Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision related to Fiscal 2011 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring liability as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision related to Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision related to Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring liability as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Severance and Benefits Facilities and Other (In millions) Total 3.2 0.9 1.0 1.8 1.2 1.9 5.4 1.0 (6.8) 1.5 $ 1.8 1.4 1.2 — 0.1 0.8 0.4 4.3 (1.8) 3.7 $ $ $ 5.0 2.3 2.2 1.8 1.3 2.7 5.8 5.3 5.2 2.8 2.4 (8.6) Current portion of restructuring liability as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term portion of restructuring liability (included in other long-term liabilities) as of June 27, 2014 Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity Stock Incentive Programs 2007 Stock Equity Plan As of June 27, 2014, we had one stock incentive plan for our employees and nonemployee directors, the 2007 Stock Equity Plan, as amended and restated effective November 17, 2011 (the “2007 Stock Plan”). The 2007 Stock Plan provides for accelerated vesting of certain share-based awards if there is a change in control of the Company. The 2007 Stock Plan also provides for the issuance of share-based awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and units, and performance share awards and units. We have various incentive programs under the 2007 Stock Plan, including annual and long-term incentive programs ("AIP" or "LTIP"), a global equity program ("GEP") and product development incentive programs (“PDIP”). Under the 2007 Stock Plan, option exercise prices are equal to the fair market value on the date the options are granted using our closing stock price. Options may be exercised for a period set at the time of grant, which is generally seven years after the date of grant. Options generally vest in installments on one of three vesting schedules: (1) 50% one year from the grant date and 25% each year thereafter over a three-year period from the date of grant; (2) one-third annually over a three-year period from the date of grant; or (3) one-fourth annually over a four-year period from date of grant. Stock options are issued to directors annually and generally vest on the day before the annual shareholders' Restricted stock is not transferable until vested and the restrictions lapse upon the achievement of continued employment or service over a specified time period. Restricted stock issued to employees generally vests either one-third annually over a three-year period from the date of grant or in full three years after the grant date. Restricted stock is issued to directors annually and generally vests on the day before the annual shareholders' meeting. Vesting of performance shares under our AIP, LTIP or GEP is subject to financial performance criteria including revenue, operating income, or cash flow targets for the periods as defined in the programs and continued employment through the end of the applicable period. Performance shares under our PDIPs are issued to employees related to certain $ $ 12.6 3.7 16.3 (in millions) $ 0.9 1.4 2.3 $ Severance and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Facilities and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total for Fiscal 2011 Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 1.2 0.1 1.3 68 Severance and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Facilities and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total for Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5.4 0.4 5.8 $ $ (in millions) 5.4 0.4 5.8 $ $ 1.1 1.7 2.8 $ $ 6.5 2.1 8.6 During fiscal 2014, our severance and benefits charges under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan primarily related to reductions in force in Santa Clara, California, and several international locations. We intend to substantially complete the remaining restructuring activities under the Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2015. Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we initiated a restructuring plan (the “Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan”) to bring our cost structure in line with the changing business environment of the worldwide microwave radio and telecommunication markets, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan include the downsizing of our Santa Clara, California headquarters and certain international field offices, and reductions in force to reduce our operating expenses. The following table summarizes our costs incurred during fiscal 2014 and 2013, estimated additional costs to be incurred and estimated total costs expected to be incurred as of June 27, 2014 under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan: Costs Incurred During Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 Cumulative Costs Incurred Through June 27, 2014 (in millions) Estimated Additional Costs to be Incurred Total Restructuring Costs Expected to be Incurred Severance and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . $ Facilities and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total for Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan . . . $ 1.0 4.3 5.3 $ $ 1.8 — 1.8 $ $ 2.8 4.3 7.1 $ $ — $ 0.7 0.7 $ 2.8 5.0 7.8 During fiscal 2014 and 2013, our severance and benefits charges under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan primarily related to reductions in force in Santa Clara, California and several international locations of their finance and engineering functions. Facilities and other charges in of fiscal 2014 included obligations under a non-cancelable lease for facilities that we ceased to use at our Santa Clara, California headquarters and certain U.S. and international field offices. As of June 27, 2014, we completed a majority of the restructuring activities under the Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan. Fiscal 2011 Plan During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we initiated a restructuring plan (the “Fiscal 2011 Plan”) to reduce our operational costs. The Fiscal 2011 Plan was intended to bring our cost structure in line with the changing dynamics of the worldwide microwave radio and telecommunication markets, primarily in North America, Europe and Asia. Activities under the Fiscal 2011 Plan included reductions in force to reduce our operating expenses and the downsizing or closure of our Morrisville, North Carolina, Santa Clara, California, Montreal, Canada and certain international field offices. The initiatives under the Fiscal 2011 Plan were completed in fiscal 2013. The following table summarizes our costs incurred during fiscal 2013 and 2012 and total costs incurred under the Fiscal 2011 Plan: Costs Incurred During Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2014 Cumulative Costs Incurred Through June 27, 2014 Estimated Additional Costs to be Incurred Total Restructuring Costs Expected to be Incurred Restructuring Liabilities The information in the following table summarizes our restructuring activities during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 and restructuring liability as of June 27, 2014: Restructuring liability as of July 1, 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Provision related to Fiscal 2011 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring liability as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision related to Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision related to Fiscal 2011 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring liability as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision related to Fiscal 2014-2015 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision related to Fiscal 2013-2014 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restructuring liability as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Severance and Benefits Facilities and Other (In millions) Total 3.2 $ 1.8 $ 0.9 (3.1) 1.0 1.8 1.2 (2.1) 1.9 5.4 1.0 (6.8) 1.5 $ 1.4 (2.0) 1.2 — 0.1 (0.5) 0.8 0.4 4.3 (1.8) 3.7 $ $ $ 5.0 2.3 (5.1) 2.2 1.8 1.3 (2.6) 2.7 5.8 5.3 (8.6) 5.2 2.8 2.4 A n n u a l R e p o r t Current portion of restructuring liability as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term portion of restructuring liability (included in other long-term liabilities) as of June 27, 2014 Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity Stock Incentive Programs 2007 Stock Equity Plan As of June 27, 2014, we had one stock incentive plan for our employees and nonemployee directors, the 2007 Stock Equity Plan, as amended and restated effective November 17, 2011 (the “2007 Stock Plan”). The 2007 Stock Plan provides for accelerated vesting of certain share-based awards if there is a change in control of the Company. The 2007 Stock Plan also provides for the issuance of share-based awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and units, and performance share awards and units. We have various incentive programs under the 2007 Stock Plan, including annual and long-term incentive programs ("AIP" or "LTIP"), a global equity program ("GEP") and product development incentive programs (“PDIP”). Under the 2007 Stock Plan, option exercise prices are equal to the fair market value on the date the options are granted using our closing stock price. Options may be exercised for a period set at the time of grant, which is generally seven years after the date of grant. Options generally vest in installments on one of three vesting schedules: (1) 50% one year from the grant date and 25% each year thereafter over a three-year period from the date of grant; (2) one-third annually over a three-year period from the date of grant; or (3) one-fourth annually over a four-year period from date of grant. Stock options are issued to directors annually and generally vest on the day before the annual shareholders' meeting. Severance and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Facilities and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total for Fiscal 2011 Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 1.2 0.1 1.3 $ $ 0.9 1.4 2.3 $ $ 12.6 3.7 16.3 Vesting of performance shares under our AIP, LTIP or GEP is subject to financial performance criteria including revenue, operating income, or cash flow targets for the periods as defined in the programs and continued employment through the end of the applicable period. Performance shares under our PDIPs are issued to employees related to certain Costs Incurred During Fiscal Year Ended Cumulative Costs Incurred Through June 28, 2013 June 29, 2012 June 28, 2013 (in millions) Restricted stock is not transferable until vested and the restrictions lapse upon the achievement of continued employment or service over a specified time period. Restricted stock issued to employees generally vests either one-third annually over a three-year period from the date of grant or in full three years after the grant date. Restricted stock is issued to directors annually and generally vests on the day before the annual shareholders' meeting. 69 t r o p e R l a u n n A new product development projects and vest upon achievement of the product development milestones as defined in the programs. Upon the exercise of stock options, vesting of restricted stock awards and units, or vesting of performance share awards and units, we issue new shares of our common stock to our employees. All awards that are canceled prior to vesting or expire unexercised are returned to the approved pool of reserved shares under the 2007 Stock Plan and made available for future grants. Shares of our common stock remaining available for future issuance under the 2007 Stock Plan totaled 3,599,382 as of June 27, 2014. Acquisition Plan We assumed all of the former Stratex outstanding stock options as of January 26, 2007, as part of the Stratex acquisition. The outstanding former Stratex options became fully vested in fiscal 2011. Employee Stock Purchase Plan Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), employees are entitled to purchase shares of our common stock at a 5% discount from the fair market value at the end of a three-month purchase period. As of June 27, 2014, 766,257 shares were reserved for future issuances under the ESPP. We issued 21,493 shares under the ESPP during fiscal 2014. Share-Based Compensation Total compensation expense for share-based awards included in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was as follows: (In millions) By Expense Category: Cost of product sales and services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ By Types of Award: Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Restricted stock awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Performance shares. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 0.1 0.3 3.0 3.4 1.9 0.7 0.8 3.4 $ $ $ $ 0.5 1.0 4.9 6.4 2.5 1.5 2.4 6.4 $ $ $ $ 0.7 0.9 3.6 5.2 2.6 1.8 0.8 5.2 As of June 27, 2014, there was $2.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock options and restricted stock awards and units granted under our 2007 Stock Equity Plan. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years. Stock Options A summary of the combined stock option activity under our equity plans during fiscal 2014 is as follows: 70 Weighted Average Shares Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life Aggregate Intrinsic Value (Years) ($ in millions) 4.85 $1.0 Options outstanding as of June 28, 2013. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,190,564 2,263,978 (27,958) (789,035) (88,550) Options outstanding as of June 27, 2014. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,548,999 Options exercisable as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options vested and expected to vest as of June 27, 2014 . . 4,344,589 7,211,372 $3.95 $2.36 $2.09 $3.85 $20.18 $3.31 $3.98 $3.35 4.53 3.59 4.41 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value or the aggregate difference between the closing price of our common stock on June 27, 2014 of $1.25 and the exercise price for in-the-money options that would have been received by the optionees if all options had been exercised on June 27, 2014. The options expected to vest are the result of applying the pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to total outstanding options. Additional information related to our stock options is summarized below: (In millions, except per share amounts) Weighted average grant date fair value per share granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.06 1.30 Intrinsic value of options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ — $ Fair value of options vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2.2 3.0 $ $ $ $ 1.22 — 3.0 Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 The fair value of each option grant under our 2007 Stock Equity Plan was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of grant. A summary of the significant weighted average assumptions we used in the Black-Scholes valuation model is as follows: Expected dividends. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected term (years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —% 54.1% 1.26% 4.43 —% 64.9% 0.49% 4.33 —% 65.9% 0.73% 4.46 Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 Expected volatility is based on implied volatility for the expected term of the options from our stock price. The expected term of the options is calculated using the simplified method described in the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletins Topic 14.D.2. We use the simplified method because we do not have sufficient stock option exercise data and the types of employees that receive share option grants have been significantly changed due to the implementation of our 2012 global equity plan, under which we granted share-based awards to employees who are not eligible for the long-term incentive programs. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield is zero because we have not historically paid dividends on our common stock and have no intention to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. The following summarizes all of our stock options outstanding and exercisable as of June 27, 2014: Employee Stock Purchase Plan 2014. Share-Based Compensation 2014, 2013 and 2012 was as follows: (In millions) By Expense Category: new product development projects and vest upon achievement of the product development milestones as defined in the programs. Upon the exercise of stock options, vesting of restricted stock awards and units, or vesting of performance share awards and units, we issue new shares of our common stock to our employees. All awards that are canceled prior to vesting or expire unexercised are returned to the approved pool of reserved shares under the 2007 Stock Plan and made available for future grants. Shares of our common stock remaining available for future issuance under the 2007 Stock Plan totaled 3,599,382 as of June 27, 2014. Acquisition Plan We assumed all of the former Stratex outstanding stock options as of January 26, 2007, as part of the Stratex acquisition. The outstanding former Stratex options became fully vested in fiscal 2011. Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), employees are entitled to purchase shares of our common stock at a 5% discount from the fair market value at the end of a three-month purchase period. As of June 27, 2014, 766,257 shares were reserved for future issuances under the ESPP. We issued 21,493 shares under the ESPP during fiscal Total compensation expense for share-based awards included in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 Cost of product sales and services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ By Types of Award: Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Restricted stock awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Performance shares. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.1 0.3 3.0 3.4 1.9 0.7 0.8 3.4 $ $ $ $ 0.5 1.0 4.9 6.4 2.5 1.5 2.4 6.4 $ $ $ $ 0.7 0.9 3.6 5.2 2.6 1.8 0.8 5.2 As of June 27, 2014, there was $2.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock options and restricted stock awards and units granted under our 2007 Stock Equity Plan. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years. Stock Options A summary of the combined stock option activity under our equity plans during fiscal 2014 is as follows: Options outstanding as of June 28, 2013. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding as of June 27, 2014. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options exercisable as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options vested and expected to vest as of June 27, 2014 . . Shares 6,190,564 2,263,978 (27,958) (789,035) (88,550) 7,548,999 4,344,589 7,211,372 Weighted Average Exercise Price $3.95 $2.36 $2.09 $3.85 $20.18 $3.31 $3.98 $3.35 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 4.85 Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in millions) $1.0 4.53 3.59 4.41 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value or the aggregate difference between the closing price of our common stock on June 27, 2014 of $1.25 and the exercise price for in-the-money options that would have been received by the optionees if all options had been exercised on June 27, 2014. The options expected to vest are the result of applying the pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to total outstanding options. Additional information related to our stock options is summarized below: (In millions, except per share amounts) Weighted average grant date fair value per share granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Intrinsic value of options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fair value of options vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2014 2013 2012 1.06 $ — $ $ 2.2 1.30 $ — $ $ 3.0 1.22 — 3.0 Fiscal Year A n n u a l R e p o r t The fair value of each option grant under our 2007 Stock Equity Plan was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of grant. A summary of the significant weighted average assumptions we used in the Black-Scholes valuation model is as follows: Expected dividends. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected term (years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —% 54.1% 1.26% 4.43 —% 64.9% 0.49% 4.33 —% 65.9% 0.73% 4.46 Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 Expected volatility is based on implied volatility for the expected term of the options from our stock price. The expected term of the options is calculated using the simplified method described in the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletins Topic 14.D.2. We use the simplified method because we do not have sufficient stock option exercise data and the types of employees that receive share option grants have been significantly changed due to the implementation of our 2012 global equity plan, under which we granted share-based awards to employees who are not eligible for the long-term incentive programs. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield is zero because we have not historically paid dividends on our common stock and have no intention to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. The following summarizes all of our stock options outstanding and exercisable as of June 27, 2014: 71 t r o p e R l a u n n A Actual Range of Exercise Prices Number Outstanding Options Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) Options Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price Number Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price $1.72 — $2.11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.19 — $2.37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.41 — $2.60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.71 — $4.36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4.42 — $6.44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.50 — $24.60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1.72 — $24.60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,357,137 1,768,886 1,708,065 1,369,577 1,244,431 100,903 7,548,999 4.72 5.14 5.65 3.76 2.32 2.31 4.43 $2.06 $2.28 $2.58 $3.58 $6.03 $12.57 $3.30 851,497 713,288 331,416 1,103,054 1,244,431 100,903 4,344,589 $2.08 $2.34 $2.56 $3.78 $6.03 $12.57 $3.97 Restricted Stock A summary of the status of our restricted stock as of June 27, 2014 and changes during fiscal 2014 were as follows: Restricted stock outstanding as of June 28, 2013. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested and released. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock outstanding as of June 27, 2014. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 562,045 104,475 (325,112) (26,750) 314,658 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $3.27 $1.96 $3.35 $2.66 $2.80 The fair value of each restricted stock grant is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and is amortized to compensation expense over its vesting period. The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $0.7 million, $1.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Performance Share Awards A summary of the status of our performance shares as of June 27, 2014 and changes during fiscal 2014 were as follows: Performance shares outstanding as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested and released . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited due to target thresholds not achieved. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited due to terminations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Performance shares outstanding as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 1,626,362 — (1,187,796) (359,274) (12,625) 66,667 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $2.91 N/A $2.37 $4.67 $5.13 $2.59 The fair value of each performance share is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and is amortized over its vesting period. We begin recognize share-based compensation costs for the performance shares when achievement of the performance conditions is considered probable. Any previously recognized compensation cost would be reversed if the performance condition is not satisfied or if it is not probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. The total fair value of performance share awards that vested during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $3.0 million, $0.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively. 72 Note 11. Segment and Geographic Information We operate in one reportable business segment: the design, manufacturing and sale of a range of wireless networking products, solutions and services. We conduct business globally and our sales and support activities are managed on a geographic basis. Our Chief Executive Officer is the Chief Operating Decision Maker (the “CODM”). Our CODM manages our business primarily by function globally and reviews financial information on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by geographic region, for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. The profitability of our geographic region is not a determining factor in allocating resources and the CODM does not evaluate profitability below the level of the consolidated company. We report revenue by region and country based on the location where our customers accept delivery of our products and services. Revenue by region for 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows: (In millions) North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ Africa and Middle East. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe and Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Latin America and Asia Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 142.0 108.9 36.0 59.1 180.5 182.2 48.0 60.6 Total Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 346.0 $ 471.3 $ Revenue by country comprising more than 5% of our total revenue for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows: Revenue % of Total Revenue (In millions, except %) Fiscal 2014: Fiscal 2013: Fiscal 2012: United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ France. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 139.2 52.2 177.0 92.7 161.6 94.5 27.9 164.9 147.7 53.6 77.8 444.0 40.2% 15.1% 37.6% 19.7% 36.4% 21.3% 6.3% Our long-lived assets, consisting primarily of property, plant and equipment, by geographic areas based on the physical location of the assets as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 were as follows: (In millions) June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21.5 $ United Kingdom. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other countries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 4.5 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29.3 $ 22.0 3.5 3.8 29.3 Note 12. Income Taxes 2012 is as follows: Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes during fiscal year 2014, 2013 and Actual Range of Exercise Prices $1.72 — $2.11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.19 — $2.37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.41 — $2.60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.71 — $4.36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4.42 — $6.44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.50 — $24.60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number Outstanding 1,357,137 1,768,886 1,708,065 1,369,577 1,244,431 100,903 $1.72 — $24.60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,548,999 Options Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) Options Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price Number Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price 4.72 5.14 5.65 3.76 2.32 2.31 4.43 $2.06 $2.28 $2.58 $3.58 $6.03 $12.57 $3.30 851,497 713,288 331,416 1,103,054 1,244,431 100,903 4,344,589 $2.08 $2.34 $2.56 $3.78 $6.03 $12.57 $3.97 Restricted Stock follows: A summary of the status of our restricted stock as of June 27, 2014 and changes during fiscal 2014 were as Restricted stock outstanding as of June 28, 2013. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested and released. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted stock outstanding as of June 27, 2014. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 562,045 104,475 (325,112) (26,750) 314,658 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $3.27 $1.96 $3.35 $2.66 $2.80 The fair value of each restricted stock grant is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and is amortized to compensation expense over its vesting period. The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $0.7 million, $1.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Performance Share Awards follows: A summary of the status of our performance shares as of June 27, 2014 and changes during fiscal 2014 were as Performance shares outstanding as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,626,362 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested and released . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited due to target thresholds not achieved. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited due to terminations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Performance shares outstanding as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares — (1,187,796) (359,274) (12,625) 66,667 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value $2.91 N/A $2.37 $4.67 $5.13 $2.59 The fair value of each performance share is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and is amortized over its vesting period. We begin recognize share-based compensation costs for the performance shares when achievement of the performance conditions is considered probable. Any previously recognized compensation cost would be reversed if the performance condition is not satisfied or if it is not probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. The total fair value of performance share awards that vested during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $3.0 million, $0.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Note 11. Segment and Geographic Information We operate in one reportable business segment: the design, manufacturing and sale of a range of wireless networking products, solutions and services. We conduct business globally and our sales and support activities are managed on a geographic basis. Our Chief Executive Officer is the Chief Operating Decision Maker (the “CODM”). Our CODM manages our business primarily by function globally and reviews financial information on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by geographic region, for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. The profitability of our geographic region is not a determining factor in allocating resources and the CODM does not evaluate profitability below the level of the consolidated company. We report revenue by region and country based on the location where our customers accept delivery of our products and services. Revenue by region for 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows: (In millions) North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Africa and Middle East. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe and Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Latin America and Asia Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 142.0 108.9 36.0 59.1 346.0 $ $ 180.5 182.2 48.0 60.6 471.3 $ $ 164.9 147.7 53.6 77.8 444.0 Revenue by country comprising more than 5% of our total revenue for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows: (In millions, except %) Fiscal 2014: United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fiscal 2013: United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fiscal 2012: United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Nigeria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ France. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Revenue % of Total Revenue 139.2 52.2 177.0 92.7 161.6 94.5 27.9 40.2% 15.1% 37.6% 19.7% 36.4% 21.3% 6.3% Our long-lived assets, consisting primarily of property, plant and equipment, by geographic areas based on the physical location of the assets as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 were as follows: (In millions) United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ United Kingdom. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other countries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 21.5 3.3 4.5 29.3 $ $ 22.0 3.5 3.8 29.3 Note 12. Income Taxes Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes during fiscal year 2014, 2013 and 2012 is as follows: A n n u a l R e p o r t 73 Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 (In millions) United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . $ (25.3) $ (25.3) (50.6) $ (4.8) $ 7.2 2.4 $ (5.6) (8.4) (14.0) Provision for income taxes from continuing operations for fiscal year 2014, 2013 and 2012 were summarized as follows: Current provision (benefit): United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State and local. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t r o p e R l a u n n A Deferred provision (benefit): United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State and local. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total provision for income taxes from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . $ Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 (In millions) (0.1) $ 1.9 — 1.8 — (0.3) — (0.3) 1.5 $ (0.1) $ 13.6 — 13.5 — (0.2) — (0.2) 13.3 $ 0.1 1.4 — 1.5 — — — — 1.5 The following table summarizes the significant differences between the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate and our effective tax rate from continuing operations for fiscal year 2014, 2013 and 2012: Statutory U.S. federal tax rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign non-deductible expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State and local taxes, net of U.S. federal tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment not deductible . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign income taxed at rates less than the U.S. statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend from foreign subsidiary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign branch income/withholding taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in uncertain tax positions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effective tax rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 (35.0)% 30.0 % 0.9 % (1.3)% — % 8.5 % — % 2.0 % (1.7)% (0.4)% 3.0 % Fiscal Year 2013 35.0 % 67.4 % 11.1 % (1.7)% — % (63.9)% — % 27.5 % 488.9 % (10.1)% 554.2 % 2012 (35.0)% 12.8 % — % (1.7)% 6.6 % 4.4 % 12.1 % 7.2 % — % 4.3 % 10.7 % The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal year 2014 was $1.5 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax expense at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax loss of $50.6 million was primarily attributable to losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit and increases in foreign withholding taxes. The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal year 2013 was $13.3 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax benefit at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax income of $2.4 million was primarily attributable to a $11.7 million increase in our reserve for uncertain tax positions, losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit, and increases in foreign withholding taxes. 74 The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal year 2012 was $1.5 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax benefit at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax loss of $14.0 million was primarily attributable to losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit. The tax expense for fiscal year 2012 of $1.5 million was primarily attributable to profitable foreign entities for which we have accrued income taxes. The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows: Deferred tax assets: Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12.0 $ — $ 10.5 $ June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 Current Non-Current Current Non-Current (In millions) Accruals and reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bad debts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized exchange gain/loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax loss carryforwards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities: Branch undistributed earnings reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.7 2.4 — — — — 3.2 1.1 — — 0.1 — 0.1 0.2 1.3 23.4 (21.9) 1.5 0.1 — 0.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 — 4.2 3.4 1.4 3.8 — 5.2 21.5 134.2 172.2 (168.8) 5.4 2.5 — — — — 3.6 — — — 1.1 — — 1.1 22.0 (21.1) 0.9 24.5 — 0.1 — — 5.6 0.7 — 4.8 1.4 0.2 0.8 0.7 1.7 20.3 122.3 178.3 (176.9) Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ (1.8) $ (0.2) $ (0.3) Our valuation allowance related to deferred income taxes, as reflected in our consolidated balance sheet, was $190.7 million as of June 27, 2014 and $198.0 million as of June 28, 2013. The decrease in valuation allowance in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to the decrease of net operating loss in certain foreign jurisdiction. Tax loss and credit carryforwards as of June 27, 2014 have expiration dates ranging between one year and no expiration in certain instances. The amount of U.S. federal tax loss carryforwards as of June 27, 2014 was $292.2 million and begin to expire in fiscal 2023. Credit carryforwards as of June 27, 2014 were $27.3 million, and certain credits began to expire in fiscal 2017. The amount of foreign tax loss carryforwards as of June 27, 2014 was $104.1 million. United States income taxes have not been provided on basis differences in foreign subsidiaries of $5.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively, as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, because of our intention to reinvest these earnings indefinitely. The residual U.S. tax liability, if such amounts were remitted, would be nominal. We entered into a tax sharing agreement with Harris effective on January 26, 2007, the date of the acquisition of Stratex. The tax sharing agreement addresses, among other things, the settlement process associated with pre-merger tax liabilities and tax attributes that are attributable to the Microwave Communication Division when it was a division of Harris. There was no settlement payments recorded in fiscal year 2014, 2013 or 2012. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $28.2 million and $28.7 million, respectively, for various federal, foreign, and state income tax matters. Our total unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate were $1.0 million as of June 27, 2014. These unrecognized tax benefits are presented on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet net of the tax effects of net operating loss carryforwards. 2014 2013 2012 Fiscal Year (In millions) United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (25.3) $ (4.8) $ Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (25.3) Total Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . $ (50.6) $ 7.2 2.4 $ (5.6) (8.4) (14.0) Provision for income taxes from continuing operations for fiscal year 2014, 2013 and 2012 were summarized as follows: Current provision (benefit): United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.1) $ (0.1) $ Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State and local. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred provision (benefit): United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State and local. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2013 2012 Fiscal Year (In millions) 1.9 — 1.8 — (0.3) — (0.3) 13.6 — 13.5 — (0.2) — (0.2) 0.1 1.4 — 1.5 — — — — 1.5 Total provision for income taxes from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.5 $ 13.3 $ The following table summarizes the significant differences between the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate and our effective tax rate from continuing operations for fiscal year 2014, 2013 and 2012: Fiscal Year 2014 2013 2012 Statutory U.S. federal tax rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (35.0)% Valuation allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign non-deductible expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State and local taxes, net of U.S. federal tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment not deductible . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign income taxed at rates less than the U.S. statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend from foreign subsidiary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign branch income/withholding taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in uncertain tax positions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effective tax rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.0 % 0.9 % (1.3)% — % 8.5 % — % 2.0 % (1.7)% (0.4)% 3.0 % 35.0 % 67.4 % 11.1 % (1.7)% — % (63.9)% — % 27.5 % 488.9 % (10.1)% 554.2 % (35.0)% 12.8 % — % (1.7)% 6.6 % 4.4 % 12.1 % 7.2 % — % 4.3 % 10.7 % The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal year 2014 was $1.5 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax expense at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax loss of $50.6 million was primarily attributable to losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit and increases in foreign withholding taxes. The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal year 2013 was $13.3 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax benefit at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax income of $2.4 million was primarily attributable to a $11.7 million increase in our reserve for uncertain tax positions, losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit, and increases in foreign withholding taxes. The income tax expense from continuing operations for fiscal year 2012 was $1.5 million. The difference between our income tax expense from continuing operations and income tax benefit at the statutory rate of 35% on our pre-tax loss of $14.0 million was primarily attributable to losses in tax jurisdictions in which we cannot recognize a tax benefit. The tax expense for fiscal year 2012 of $1.5 million was primarily attributable to profitable foreign entities for which we have accrued income taxes. The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows: June 27, 2014 June 28, 2013 Current Non-Current Current Non-Current (In millions) Deferred tax assets: Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Accruals and reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bad debts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized exchange gain/loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax loss carryforwards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities: Branch undistributed earnings reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 12.0 4.7 2.4 — — — — 3.2 1.1 — — 23.4 (21.9) 1.5 0.1 — 0.1 0.2 1.3 $ — $ 0.1 — 0.2 4.1 4.0 3.9 — 4.2 21.5 134.2 172.2 (168.8) 3.4 1.4 3.8 — 5.2 (1.8) $ $ 10.5 5.4 2.5 — — — — 3.6 — — — 22.0 (21.1) 0.9 1.1 — — 1.1 (0.2) $ — 0.1 — — 24.5 5.6 0.7 — 4.8 20.3 122.3 178.3 (176.9) 1.4 0.2 0.8 0.7 1.7 (0.3) A n n u a l R e p o r t Our valuation allowance related to deferred income taxes, as reflected in our consolidated balance sheet, was $190.7 million as of June 27, 2014 and $198.0 million as of June 28, 2013. The decrease in valuation allowance in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to the decrease of net operating loss in certain foreign jurisdiction. Tax loss and credit carryforwards as of June 27, 2014 have expiration dates ranging between one year and no expiration in certain instances. The amount of U.S. federal tax loss carryforwards as of June 27, 2014 was $292.2 million and begin to expire in fiscal 2023. Credit carryforwards as of June 27, 2014 were $27.3 million, and certain credits began to expire in fiscal 2017. The amount of foreign tax loss carryforwards as of June 27, 2014 was $104.1 million. United States income taxes have not been provided on basis differences in foreign subsidiaries of $5.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively, as of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, because of our intention to reinvest these earnings indefinitely. The residual U.S. tax liability, if such amounts were remitted, would be nominal. We entered into a tax sharing agreement with Harris effective on January 26, 2007, the date of the acquisition of Stratex. The tax sharing agreement addresses, among other things, the settlement process associated with pre-merger tax liabilities and tax attributes that are attributable to the Microwave Communication Division when it was a division of Harris. There was no settlement payments recorded in fiscal year 2014, 2013 or 2012. As of June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $28.2 million and $28.7 million, respectively, for various federal, foreign, and state income tax matters. Our total unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate were $1.0 million as of June 27, 2014. These unrecognized tax benefits are presented on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet net of the tax effects of net operating loss carryforwards. 75 We account for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of our provision for income taxes. We accrued such interest of $0.1 million as of June 27, 2014 and $0.1 million as of June 28, 2013. No penalties have been accrued. Fiscal Years During the current year, we received an assessment letter from the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (“Singapore”) related to deductions claimed in prior years and made a prepayment of $13.2 million related to tax years 2007 through 2010, reflecting all of the taxes incrementally assessed by Singapore. We continue to defend our tax positions in Singapore and we continue to pursue remedies to object to this assessment. During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that an ultimate settlement will be achieved which will result in our unrecognized tax benefits changing by up to $14.0 million . We believe that we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to our tax audits. Our unrecognized tax benefit activity for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 is as follows: t r o p e R l a u n n A Unrecognized tax benefit as of July 1, 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Additions for tax positions in prior periods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decreases for tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized tax benefit as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions in current periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions in prior periods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decreases for tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized tax benefit as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions in prior periods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decreases for tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases related to change of foreign exchange rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized tax benefit as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Amount (In millions) 14.0 — (0.6) 13.4 0.7 15.0 (0.4) 28.7 8.7 (12.1) 2.9 28.2 We have a number of years with open tax audits which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Our major tax jurisdictions include the U.S., Singapore and Nigeria. The earliest years still open and subject to potential audits for these jurisdictions are as follows: U.S. —2003; Singapore — 2006; and Nigeria — 2011. Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies Operating Lease Commitments We lease office and manufacturing facilities under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through April 2020. We lease approximately 129,000 square feet of office space in Santa Clara, California as our corporate headquarters. As of June 27, 2014, future minimum lease payments for our headquarters total $15.1 million through April 2020. We vacated approximately half of our Santa Clara headquarters building and made it available for sublease at September 27, 2013. As of June 27, 2014, our future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases with an initial lease term in excess of one year were as follows: 76 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 20.2 Amount (In millions) 5.0 4.1 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.4 These commitments do not contain any material rent escalations, rent holidays, contingent rent, rent concessions, leasehold improvement incentives or unusual provisions or conditions. We sublease a portion of our facilities to third parties and total minimum rentals to be received in the future under our noncancelable subleases was $0.1 million as of June 27, 2014. Rental expense for operating leases, including rentals on a month-to-month basis was $7.7 million, $8.5 million and $9.3 million in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Purchase Orders and Other Commitments From time to time in the normal course of business we may enter into purchasing agreements with our suppliers that require us to accept delivery of, and remit full payment for, finished products that we have ordered, finished products that we requested be held as safety stock, and work in process started on our behalf in the event we cancel or terminate the purchasing agreement. Because these agreements do not specify fixed or minimum quantities, do not specify minimum or variable price provisions, and do not specify the approximate timing of the transaction, and we have no present intention to cancel or terminate any of these agreements, we currently do not believe that we have any future liability under these agreements. As of June 27, 2014, we had outstanding purchase obligations with our suppliers or contract manufacturers of $48.3 million. Financial Guarantees and Commercial Commitments Guarantees issued by banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions are contingent commitments issued to guarantee our performance under borrowing arrangements, such as bank overdraft facilities, tax and customs obligations and similar transactions or to ensure our performance under customer or vendor contracts. The terms of the guarantees are generally equal to the remaining term of the related debt or other obligations and are generally limited to two years or less. As of June 27, 2014, we had no guarantees applicable to our debt arrangements. We have entered into commercial commitments in the normal course of business including surety bonds, standby letters of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions primarily relating to the guarantee of future performance on certain contracts to provide products and services to customers. As of June 27, 2014, we had commercial commitments of $45.8 million outstanding that were not recorded in our consolidated balance sheets. We do not believe, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid on the performance guarantees. Indemnifications Under the terms of substantially all of our license agreements, we have agreed to defend and pay any final judgment against our customers arising from claims against such customers that our software products infringe the intellectual property rights of a third party. As of June 27, 2014, we have not received any notice that any customer is subject to an infringement claim arising from the use of our software products; we have not received any request to defend any customers from infringement claims arising from the use of our software products; and we have not paid any final judgment on behalf of any customer related to an infringement claim arising from the use of our software products. Because the outcome of infringement disputes is related to the specific facts of each case, and given the lack of previous or current indemnification claims, we cannot estimate the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to our indemnification provisions. As of June 27, 2014, we had not recorded any liabilities related to these indemnifications. During the current year, we received an assessment letter from the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (“Singapore”) related to deductions claimed in prior years and made a prepayment of $13.2 million related to tax years 2007 through 2010, reflecting all of the taxes incrementally assessed by Singapore. We continue to defend our tax positions in Singapore and we continue to pursue remedies to object to this assessment. During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that an ultimate settlement will be achieved which will result in our unrecognized tax benefits changing by up to $14.0 million . We believe that we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to our tax audits. Our unrecognized tax benefit activity for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 is as follows: Unrecognized tax benefit as of July 1, 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Additions for tax positions in prior periods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decreases for tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized tax benefit as of June 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions in current periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions in prior periods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decreases for tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized tax benefit as of June 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions for tax positions in prior periods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Decreases for tax positions in prior periods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases related to change of foreign exchange rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized tax benefit as of June 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Amount (In millions) 14.0 — (0.6) 13.4 0.7 15.0 (0.4) 28.7 8.7 (12.1) 2.9 28.2 We have a number of years with open tax audits which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Our major tax jurisdictions include the U.S., Singapore and Nigeria. The earliest years still open and subject to potential audits for these jurisdictions are as follows: U.S. —2003; Singapore — 2006; and Nigeria — 2011. Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies Operating Lease Commitments We lease office and manufacturing facilities under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through April 2020. We lease approximately 129,000 square feet of office space in Santa Clara, California as our corporate headquarters. As of June 27, 2014, future minimum lease payments for our headquarters total $15.1 million through April 2020. We vacated approximately half of our Santa Clara headquarters building and made it available for sublease at September 27, 2013. We account for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of our provision for income taxes. We accrued such interest of $0.1 million as of June 27, 2014 and $0.1 million as of June 28, 2013. No penalties have Fiscal Years been accrued. 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Amount (In millions) 5.0 4.1 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.4 20.2 These commitments do not contain any material rent escalations, rent holidays, contingent rent, rent concessions, leasehold improvement incentives or unusual provisions or conditions. We sublease a portion of our facilities to third parties and total minimum rentals to be received in the future under our noncancelable subleases was $0.1 million as of June 27, 2014. Rental expense for operating leases, including rentals on a month-to-month basis was $7.7 million, $8.5 million and $9.3 million in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Purchase Orders and Other Commitments From time to time in the normal course of business we may enter into purchasing agreements with our suppliers that require us to accept delivery of, and remit full payment for, finished products that we have ordered, finished products that we requested be held as safety stock, and work in process started on our behalf in the event we cancel or terminate the purchasing agreement. Because these agreements do not specify fixed or minimum quantities, do not specify minimum or variable price provisions, and do not specify the approximate timing of the transaction, and we have no present intention to cancel or terminate any of these agreements, we currently do not believe that we have any future liability under these agreements. As of June 27, 2014, we had outstanding purchase obligations with our suppliers or contract manufacturers of $48.3 million. Financial Guarantees and Commercial Commitments Guarantees issued by banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions are contingent commitments issued to guarantee our performance under borrowing arrangements, such as bank overdraft facilities, tax and customs obligations and similar transactions or to ensure our performance under customer or vendor contracts. The terms of the guarantees are generally equal to the remaining term of the related debt or other obligations and are generally limited to two years or less. As of June 27, 2014, we had no guarantees applicable to our debt arrangements. We have entered into commercial commitments in the normal course of business including surety bonds, standby letters of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions primarily relating to the guarantee of future performance on certain contracts to provide products and services to customers. As of June 27, 2014, we had commercial commitments of $45.8 million outstanding that were not recorded in our consolidated balance sheets. We do not believe, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid on the performance guarantees. A n n u a l R e p o r t As of June 27, 2014, our future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases with an initial lease term in excess of one year were as follows: Indemnifications Under the terms of substantially all of our license agreements, we have agreed to defend and pay any final judgment against our customers arising from claims against such customers that our software products infringe the intellectual property rights of a third party. As of June 27, 2014, we have not received any notice that any customer is subject to an infringement claim arising from the use of our software products; we have not received any request to defend any customers from infringement claims arising from the use of our software products; and we have not paid any final judgment on behalf of any customer related to an infringement claim arising from the use of our software products. Because the outcome of infringement disputes is related to the specific facts of each case, and given the lack of previous or current indemnification claims, we cannot estimate the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to our indemnification provisions. As of June 27, 2014, we had not recorded any liabilities related to these indemnifications. 77 Q1 Ended 9/27/2013 Q2 Ended 12/272013 Q3 Ended 3/28/2014 Q4 Ended 6/27/2014 (In millions, except per share amounts) Fiscal 2014 Per share data: Fiscal 2013 Per share data: Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Operating loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 93.4 23.1 $ $ (13.4) $ (13.6) $ 85.8 21.3 $ $ (10.7) $ (9.9) $ 81.4 20.9 $ $ (14.8) $ (14.8) $ 85.4 19.8 (11.8) (12.9) Basic and diluted net loss per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.22) $ (0.16) $ (0.24) $ (0.21) Q1 Ended 9/28/2012 Q2 Ended 12/28/2012 Q3 Ended 3/29/2013 Q4 Ended 6/28/2013 (In millions, except per share amounts) Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 115.0 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 33.7 0.7 129.0 38.7 4.9 $ $ $ 118.3 34.1 $ $ (1.0) $ (1.7) $ 109.0 33.6 (2.9) (5.8) Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (2.2) $ (5.3) $ Basic and diluted net loss per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.04) $ (0.09) $ (0.03) $ (0.10) The following tables summarize certain charges, expenses and loss (income) from discontinued operations included in our results of operations for each of the fiscal quarters presented: t r o p e R l a u n n A Legal Proceedings From time to time, we may be involved in various legal claims and litigation that arise in the normal course of our operations. We record accruals for our outstanding legal proceedings, investigations or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We evaluate, at least on a quarterly basis, developments in legal proceedings, investigations or claims that could affect the amount of any accrual, as well as any developments that would result in a loss contingency to become both probable and reasonably estimable. While the results of such claims and litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that we are not a party to any litigation the final outcome of which is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, should we not prevail in any such litigation; it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results, cash flows or financial position. Contingent Liabilities We record a loss contingency as a charge to operations when (i) it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements; and (ii) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Disclosure in the notes to the financial statements is required for loss contingencies that do not meet both those conditions if there is a reasonable possibility that a loss may have been incurred. Gain contingencies are not recorded until realized. We expense all legal costs incurred to resolve regulatory, legal and tax matters as incurred. Our Singapore subsidiary is in the process of evaluating its historical compliance with certain export regulations in Singapore. Depending on the results of this evaluation, we may take additional actions to ensure our compliance with these regulations in the future. As part of these additional actions, we could elect to make certain voluntary disclosures, which may, in certain circumstances, result in the imposition of various fines and penalties. Any fines and penalties will be based on the specific facts and findings of our evaluation, as well as negotiation with Singapore authorities. At this time, we cannot estimate the amount or range of any fines and penalties, if any should be imposed. Periodically, we review the status of each significant matter to assess the potential financial exposure. If a potential loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we reflect the estimated loss in our results of operations. Significant judgment is required to determine the probability that a liability has been incurred or an asset impaired and whether such loss is reasonably estimable. Further, estimates of this nature are highly subjective, and the final outcome of these matters could vary significantly from the amounts that have been included in our consolidated financial statements. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to our pending claims and litigation and may revise estimates accordingly. Such revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position. Note 14. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) The following financial information reflects all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results of the interim periods. Our fiscal quarters end on the Friday nearest the end of the calendar quarter. Summarized quarterly data for fiscal 2014 and 2013 were as follows: 78 Legal Proceedings From time to time, we may be involved in various legal claims and litigation that arise in the normal course of our operations. We record accruals for our outstanding legal proceedings, investigations or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We evaluate, at least on a quarterly basis, developments in legal proceedings, investigations or claims that could affect the amount of any accrual, as well as any developments that would result in a loss contingency to become both probable and reasonably estimable. While the results of such claims and litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that we are not a party to any litigation the final outcome of which is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, should we not prevail in any such litigation; it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results, cash flows or financial position. Contingent Liabilities We record a loss contingency as a charge to operations when (i) it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements; and (ii) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Disclosure in the notes to the financial statements is required for loss contingencies that do not meet both those conditions if there is a reasonable possibility that a loss may have been incurred. Gain contingencies are not recorded until realized. We expense all legal costs incurred to resolve regulatory, legal and tax matters as incurred. Our Singapore subsidiary is in the process of evaluating its historical compliance with certain export regulations in Singapore. Depending on the results of this evaluation, we may take additional actions to ensure our compliance with these regulations in the future. As part of these additional actions, we could elect to make certain voluntary disclosures, which may, in certain circumstances, result in the imposition of various fines and penalties. Any fines and penalties will be based on the specific facts and findings of our evaluation, as well as negotiation with Singapore authorities. At this time, we cannot estimate the amount or range of any fines and penalties, if any should be imposed. Periodically, we review the status of each significant matter to assess the potential financial exposure. If a potential loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we reflect the estimated loss in our results of operations. Significant judgment is required to determine the probability that a liability has been incurred or an asset impaired and whether such loss is reasonably estimable. Further, estimates of this nature are highly subjective, and the final outcome of these matters could vary significantly from the amounts that have been included in our consolidated financial statements. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to our pending claims and litigation and may revise estimates accordingly. Such revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position. Note 14. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) The following financial information reflects all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results of the interim periods. Our fiscal quarters end on the Friday nearest the end of the calendar quarter. Summarized quarterly data for fiscal 2014 and 2013 were as follows: Fiscal 2014 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Operating loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Per share data: Q1 Ended 9/27/2013 Q2 Ended 12/272013 Q3 Ended 3/28/2014 Q4 Ended 6/27/2014 (In millions, except per share amounts) $ 93.4 23.1 $ (13.4) $ (13.6) $ $ 85.8 21.3 $ (10.7) $ (9.9) $ $ 81.4 $ 20.9 (14.8) $ (14.8) $ 85.4 19.8 (11.8) (12.9) Basic and diluted net loss per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.22) $ (0.16) $ (0.24) $ (0.21) Fiscal 2013 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Per share data: Q1 Ended 9/28/2012 Q2 Ended 12/28/2012 Q3 Ended 3/29/2013 Q4 Ended 6/28/2013 (In millions, except per share amounts) $ 115.0 $ 33.7 0.7 $ (2.2) $ $ 129.0 $ 38.7 $ 4.9 (5.3) $ $ 118.3 34.1 $ (1.0) $ (1.7) $ 109.0 33.6 (2.9) (5.8) Basic and diluted net loss per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.04) $ (0.09) $ (0.03) $ (0.10) A n n u a l R e p o r t The following tables summarize certain charges, expenses and loss (income) from discontinued operations included in our results of operations for each of the fiscal quarters presented: 79 Q1 Ended 9/27/2013 Q2 Ended 12/272013 Q3 Ended 3/28/2014 Q4 Ended 6/27/2014 Fiscal 2014 Amortization of purchased technology and intangible assets . . . . $ Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Excess and obsolete inventory mark-downs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional tax assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.1 4.5 — — 1.5 0.2 (In millions) $ 0.1 0.3 — 0.6 0.7 — $ 0.1 4.2 — — 0.6 — 0.1 2.1 1.2 — 0.6 — $ Income from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 6.3 (0.1) $ $ 1.7 (0.3) $ $ 4.9 (0.3) $ 4.0 (0.2) Q1 Ended 9/28/2012 Q2 Ended 12/28/2012 Q3 Ended 3/29/2013 Q4 Ended 6/28/2013 t r o p e R l a u n n A Fiscal 2013 Amortization of purchased technology and intangible assets . . . . $ Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional tax assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Loss from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.5 — 2.8 1.4 $ $ $ (In millions) 0.2 0.2 — 1.9 — 2.3 0.3 $ $ $ 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.4 — 2.8 0.1 $ $ $ 0.2 2.2 — 1.6 (0.7) 3.3 2.3 80 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Not applicable. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (a) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. A material weakness is a control deficiency or a combination of control deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In connection with the Company’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, the Company's management identified the following material weaknesses that existed as of June 27, 2014: • COSO Components, Excluding Control Activities. We determined that our controls pertaining to the control environment, risk assessment, monitoring activities and information and communication activities did not operate effectively, resulting in a material weakness pertaining to these COSO components. Specifically, (i) with respect to the control environment, we did not maintain a sufficient complement of adequately trained personnel with an appropriate level of knowledge, experience, skills and training commensurate with our financial reporting requirements and business environment; (ii) with respect to risk assessment, we did not identify risks associated with (a) implementing our newly installed worldwide enterprise resource planning system, used for financial reporting purposes, including assessing the adequacy of staffing levels and training needs of our global accounting and financial reporting staff, segregation of duty conflicts and the adequacy and effectiveness of compensating controls; (b) the completeness and accuracy of information underlying accounting estimates used in management review controls and procedures, including appropriately documenting risk tolerance and precision of such controls; and (c) certain processes, further noted in the Control Activities discussion below, resulting in inadequately designed control activities; (iii) with respect to information and communication, we did not (a) sufficiently promote an appropriate level of control awareness or commit appropriate human or financial resources to support the development of necessary information systems, including system controls and training related to our newly installed worldwide enterprise resource planning system; and (b) ensure the completeness, accuracy and timeliness of communications between the project management and accounting functions regarding our percentage-of-completion contracts; and (iv) with respect to monitoring activities, (a) we did not design and maintain effective controls for the review, supervision and monitoring of our accounting operations and evaluating the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, including adequate documentation of control performance; (b) there were insufficient procedures to effectively determine the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting; and (c) due to unanticipated turnover in the finance organization late in our fiscal year we did not maintain a sufficient number of accounting professionals with an appropriate level of knowledge, experience, skills and Income from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.1) $ (0.3) $ (0.3) $ (0.2) Fiscal 2014 Amortization of purchased technology and intangible assets . . . . $ Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Excess and obsolete inventory mark-downs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional tax assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warehouse consolidation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal 2013 Amortization of purchased technology and intangible assets . . . . $ Restructuring charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactional tax assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Q1 Ended 9/27/2013 Q2 Ended 12/272013 Q3 Ended 3/28/2014 Q4 Ended 6/27/2014 (In millions) 0.1 4.5 — — 1.5 0.2 6.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.5 — 2.8 1.4 $ $ $ $ $ 0.1 0.3 — 0.6 0.7 — 1.7 0.2 0.2 — 1.9 — 2.3 0.3 $ $ $ $ $ 0.1 4.2 — — 0.6 — 4.9 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.4 — 2.8 0.1 $ $ $ $ $ 0.1 2.1 1.2 — 0.6 — 4.0 0.2 2.2 — 1.6 3.3 2.3 (0.7) Q1 Ended 9/28/2012 Q2 Ended 12/28/2012 Q3 Ended 3/29/2013 Q4 Ended 6/28/2013 (In millions) $ $ Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Not applicable. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (a) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. A material weakness is a control deficiency or a combination of control deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In connection with the Company’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, the Company's management identified the following material weaknesses that existed as of June 27, 2014: A n n u a l R e p o r t • COSO Components, Excluding Control Activities. We determined that our controls pertaining to the control environment, risk assessment, monitoring activities and information and communication activities did not operate effectively, resulting in a material weakness pertaining to these COSO components. Specifically, (i) with respect to the control environment, we did not maintain a sufficient complement of adequately trained personnel with an appropriate level of knowledge, experience, skills and training commensurate with our financial reporting requirements and business environment; (ii) with respect to risk assessment, we did not identify risks associated with (a) implementing our newly installed worldwide enterprise resource planning system, used for financial reporting purposes, including assessing the adequacy of staffing levels and training needs of our global accounting and financial reporting staff, segregation of duty conflicts and the adequacy and effectiveness of compensating controls; (b) the completeness and accuracy of information underlying accounting estimates used in management review controls and procedures, including appropriately documenting risk tolerance and precision of such controls; and (c) certain processes, further noted in the Control Activities discussion below, resulting in inadequately designed control activities; (iii) with respect to information and communication, we did not (a) sufficiently promote an appropriate level of control awareness or commit appropriate human or financial resources to support the development of necessary information systems, including system controls and training related to our newly installed worldwide enterprise resource planning system; and (b) ensure the completeness, accuracy and timeliness of communications between the project management and accounting functions regarding our percentage-of-completion contracts; and (iv) with respect to monitoring activities, (a) we did not design and maintain effective controls for the review, supervision and monitoring of our accounting operations and evaluating the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, including adequate documentation of control performance; (b) there were insufficient procedures to effectively determine the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting; and (c) due to unanticipated turnover in the finance organization late in our fiscal year we did not maintain a sufficient number of accounting professionals with an appropriate level of knowledge, experience, skills and 81 training to monitor our compliance with internal control over financial reporting at both our domestic and international locations. The deficiencies in these COSO components are interrelated and represent a material weakness. This material weakness contributed to the other material weaknesses described below and an environment where there was more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the interim and annual consolidated financial statements could occur and not be prevented or detected. As a result, adjustments to various accounts were made to correct immaterial errors to the financial statements. Control Activities - Manual journal entries. The design and operating effectiveness of our controls were inadequate to ensure that appropriate documentation was identified, accumulated and maintained to support manual journal entries and that such manual journal entries were independently reviewed and approved. Control Activities - Account reconciliations. The design and operating effectiveness of our controls were inadequate to ensure that account reconciliations,including intercompany account reconciliations and eliminations, were reviewed and approved for accuracy and completeness and that we identified, accumulated and documented appropriate information necessary to support account balances. Control Activities - Revenue Recognition on Percentage-of-Completion ("POC") Contracts. The design and operating effectiveness of our controls were inadequate to ensure that the reported amount and timing of revenue recognition was accurate. • • • t r o p e R l a u n n A Although no material errors were identified in our audited financial statements, these material weaknesses resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses identified by management could result in a material misstatement to our annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 27, 2014 due to the material weaknesses identified. We reviewed the results of management’s assessment with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report regarding its assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2014, as set forth at the beginning of Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (b) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of June 27, 2014, management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon the evaluation and as a result of the material weaknesses described above, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 27, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurances of achieving their control objectives. (c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Other than the material weaknesses noted above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 27, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Subsequent to our June 27, 2014 fiscal year end, we began taking a number of actions, including designing and implementing new controls and revising existing controls, in order to remediate the material weaknesses described above. We expect to continue our remediation efforts, including testing of operating effectiveness of new controls, as 82 described below under “Remedial Actions to Address Material Weaknesses” during the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015 and we plan to provide an update on the status of our remediation activities on a quarterly basis. (d) Remedial Actions to Address Material Weaknesses We continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our remediation efforts, including demonstrating that the new or improved controls operate effectively for a reasonable period of time. If appropriate, we expect to make further changes to our internal controls. The following actions have been taken, or we expect to take as soon as practicable, to strengthen our controls and organizational structure: • To address issues with recent employee turnover, we hired new accounting personnel with an appropriate level of knowledge, experience and skill sets commensurate with our newly installed enterprise resource planning system and business environment. We expect to continue to evaluate our needs for new and additional personnel. We leveraged the services of consulting firms and expect to continue to do so to assist us with strengthening our internal controls and documentation. We expect to provide training in order to enhance the level of communications and understanding of controls with key individuals that provide critical information used in financial accounting and reporting on matters relating to our business and operations. • We expect to enhance our risk assessment process. With regard to risks associated with our newly installed worldwide enterprise resource planning system, we have identified subject matter experts (“SME”) and SME backups for each of the eight functional areas in our finance organization. The SMEs are expected to lead an international team of users in training, developing global processes and in logging and tracking system issues. The SMEs are expected to also be responsible for documenting all processes and coordinating all training materials and expected to have sufficient resources at our disposal to accomplish their tasks. With regard to procedures to ensure the completeness and accuracy of information used in the performance of control activities, we expect toe enhance oversight of accounting estimates and the precision level of those estimates. We expect to update policies and procedures in key areas, particularly with respect to areas that involve management judgment and the use of estimates. • We are implementing processes to improve monitoring activities involving the review and supervision of our accounting operations. We expect this to involve (i)implementing increased and enhanced balance sheet reviews to allow more focus on quality account reconciliations; (ii) enhancing monitoring over international activities; and (iii) implementing more rigorous intercompany reconciliation procedures. • We have implemented a formal policy that expressly prohibits a manual journal entry being created and approved by the same employee. Further, we have implemented a process that includes the creation of a journal entry report that identifies the preparer and the approver of each journal entry. The report will be reviewed each month by senior accounting personnel so that any exceptions to the policy can be identified on a timely basis and appropriately addressed. • To improve the timeliness and accuracy of updates to revenue and cost estimates and the completeness and accuracy of POC revenue recognition, we implemented procedures to allow for more timely and accurate communications between field service project managers and accounting personnel and improved procedures. Item 9B. Other Information None. training to monitor our compliance with internal control over financial reporting at both our domestic and international locations. The deficiencies in these COSO components are interrelated and represent a material weakness. This material weakness contributed to the other material weaknesses described below and an environment where there was more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the interim and annual consolidated financial statements could occur and not be prevented or detected. As a result, adjustments to various accounts were made to correct immaterial errors to the financial statements. • Control Activities - Manual journal entries. The design and operating effectiveness of our controls were inadequate to ensure that appropriate documentation was identified, accumulated and maintained to support manual journal entries and that such manual journal entries were independently reviewed and approved. • Control Activities - Account reconciliations. The design and operating effectiveness of our controls were inadequate to ensure that account reconciliations,including intercompany account reconciliations and eliminations, were reviewed and approved for accuracy and completeness and that we identified, accumulated and documented appropriate information necessary to support account balances. • Control Activities - Revenue Recognition on Percentage-of-Completion ("POC") Contracts. The design and operating effectiveness of our controls were inadequate to ensure that the reported amount and timing of revenue recognition was accurate. Although no material errors were identified in our audited financial statements, these material weaknesses resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses identified by management could result in a material misstatement to our annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 27, 2014 due to the material weaknesses identified. We reviewed the results of management’s assessment with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report regarding its assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 27, 2014, as set forth at the beginning of Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (b) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of June 27, 2014, management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon the evaluation and as a result of the material weaknesses described above, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 27, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurances of achieving their control objectives. (c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Other than the material weaknesses noted above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 27, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Subsequent to our June 27, 2014 fiscal year end, we began taking a number of actions, including designing and implementing new controls and revising existing controls, in order to remediate the material weaknesses described above. We expect to continue our remediation efforts, including testing of operating effectiveness of new controls, as described below under “Remedial Actions to Address Material Weaknesses” during the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015 and we plan to provide an update on the status of our remediation activities on a quarterly basis. (d) Remedial Actions to Address Material Weaknesses We continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our remediation efforts, including demonstrating that the new or improved controls operate effectively for a reasonable period of time. If appropriate, we expect to make further changes to our internal controls. The following actions have been taken, or we expect to take as soon as practicable, to strengthen our controls and organizational structure: • To address issues with recent employee turnover, we hired new accounting personnel with an appropriate level of knowledge, experience and skill sets commensurate with our newly installed enterprise resource planning system and business environment. We expect to continue to evaluate our needs for new and additional personnel. We leveraged the services of consulting firms and expect to continue to do so to assist us with strengthening our internal controls and documentation. We expect to provide training in order to enhance the level of communications and understanding of controls with key individuals that provide critical information used in financial accounting and reporting on matters relating to our business and operations. • We expect to enhance our risk assessment process. With regard to risks associated with our newly installed worldwide enterprise resource planning system, we have identified subject matter experts (“SME”) and SME backups for each of the eight functional areas in our finance organization. The SMEs are expected to lead an international team of users in training, developing global processes and in logging and tracking system issues. The SMEs are expected to also be responsible for documenting all processes and coordinating all training materials and expected to have sufficient resources at our disposal to accomplish their tasks. With regard to procedures to ensure the completeness and accuracy of information used in the performance of control activities, we expect toe enhance oversight of accounting estimates and the precision level of those estimates. We expect to update policies and procedures in key areas, particularly with respect to areas that involve management judgment and the use of estimates. A n n u a l R e p o r t • We are implementing processes to improve monitoring activities involving the review and supervision of our accounting operations. We expect this to involve (i)implementing increased and enhanced balance sheet reviews to allow more focus on quality account reconciliations; (ii) enhancing monitoring over international activities; and (iii) implementing more rigorous intercompany reconciliation procedures. • We have implemented a formal policy that expressly prohibits a manual journal entry being created and approved by the same employee. Further, we have implemented a process that includes the creation of a journal entry report that identifies the preparer and the approver of each journal entry. The report will be reviewed each month by senior accounting personnel so that any exceptions to the policy can be identified on a timely basis and appropriately addressed. • To improve the timeliness and accuracy of updates to revenue and cost estimates and the completeness and accuracy of POC revenue recognition, we implemented procedures to allow for more timely and accurate communications between field service project managers and accounting personnel and improved procedures. Item 9B. Other Information None. 83 PART III Directors’ Biographies Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Officers Information regarding our executive officers appears in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Board Members The authorized size of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) is currently eight. Directors are nominated by the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. Except for Mr. Rau, who was elected to the Board on November 9, 2010, and Mr. Pangia, who was elected to the Board on July 18, 2011, all current directors have held office as directors since January 26, 2007, the date of the merger of the Microwave Communications Division (“MCD”) of Harris Corporation (“Harris”) with Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”), The Board is chaired by Mr. Kissner. The current members of the Board are: Name Title and Positions t r o p e R l a u n n A Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, Chairman of the Board William A. Hasler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Michael A. Pangia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, President and CEO Raghavendra Rau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lead Independent Director Edward F. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Director Director Director Director The Board has determined that each of our current directors except Mr. Kissner and Mr. Pangia has no relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and is otherwise independent in accordance with listing rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market (the “NASDAQ Listing Rules”). All of our directors are requested to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. Seven of our directors attended the 2013 Annual Meeting. Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance During fiscal year 2014, the Board held nine meetings. Each of the board members attended at least 77% of the total number of Board meetings and at least 78% of the total number of meetings of the committee or committees on which the member served during fiscal year 2014. Board Member Qualifications Our Board believes that its members should encompass a range of talents, skills and expertise, which enables the Board to provide sound guidance with respect to the Company’s operations and interest. Our Board prefers a variety of professional experiences and backgrounds among its members. In addition to considering a candidate’s experiences and background, candidates are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board and evolving needs of our businesses. In particular, the Board has sought to include members that have experience in establishing, growing and leading communications companies in senior management positions and serving on the board of directors of other companies. In determining that each of the members of the Board is qualified to be a director, the Board has relied on the attributes listed below and, where applicable, on the direct personal knowledge of each of the members’ prior service on the Board. 84 The following is a brief description of the business experience and background of each nominee for director, including the capacities in which each has served during at least the past five years: Mr. Charles D. Kissner, age 67, currently serves as our Chairman of the Board. Mr. Kissner served as our Executive Chairman from July 2011 to July 2012 and again from July 2014 to December 2014, and served as non- Executive Chairman from July 2012 to July 2014. Mr. Kissner served as CEO and Chairman of the Board of Aviat from July 2010 to July 2011. He was CEO of Stratex from July 1995 through May 2000, and again from October 2001 to May 2006. He was elected a director of Stratex in July 1995 and Chairman in August 1996. Mr. Kissner also served as Vice President and General Manager of M/A-COM, Inc., a manufacturer of radio and microwave communications products, from July 1993 to July 1995. Prior to that, he was President and CEO of Aristacom International Inc., a communications software company, and Executive Vice President and a Director of Fujitsu Network Switching, Inc. He also held a number of executive positions at AT&T (now Alcatel-Lucent). Mr. Kissner currently serves as Chairman of the board of directors of ShoreTel, Inc., an IP business telephony systems company. He also serves on the board of directors of Meru Networks Inc., a provider of advanced enterprise wireless networking systems, Rambus, Inc., a technology licensing company focusing on the development of technologies that enrich the end-user experience of electronic systems, and KQED Public Media, a non-profit organization. Mr. Kissner brings extensive knowledge of our business, having served on our Board as non-executive Chairman for over three years. He also brings nearly fifteen years of relevant CEO experience having served in that capacity at technology driven companies such as Stratex and Aristacom. Mr. Kissner also brings extensive public company directorship and committee experience to the Board which has been an invaluable resource as our company regularly assesses its corporate governance, corporate compliance and risk management obligations. Mr. Kissner has also directly supervised nearly thirty merger and acquisition activities, which experience has been vital to the assessment and integration of acquisition opportunities. Mr. William A. Hasler, age 73, has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. He also serves on the board of directors of Globalstar, Inc., a supplier of satellite communication services, and Rubicon, Ltd., which holds subsidiaries focused in forestry biotechnology. Mr. Hasler served as a member of the Stratex board of directors from August 2001 through January 2007, and was Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Hasler served as Chairman of the board of directors of Solectron Corporation from 2003 to 2007 and was a member of that board from 1998 to 2007. He was co-CEO and a Director of Aphton Corp., a biopharmaceutical company, from 1998 to 2003. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Hasler was Dean of both the Graduate and Undergraduate Schools of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to his deanship at UC Berkeley, Mr. Hasler was Vice Chairman of KPMG Peat Marwick. He also served as a trustee of Schwab Funds. Mr. Hasler’s current and prior service on the boards of several technology-driven companies, including Ditech, Globalstar and Rubicon, and his prior service as Chairman of a large publicly traded company provide him with an extensive knowledge base of complex management, financial, operational and governance issues faced by public companies with international operations. He is a member of the audit committee of various public and private companies. Mr. Hasler has extensive experience in Silicon Valley companies and this experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to corporate finance and accounting, strategic planning, manufacturing and operations. He brings valuable financial expertise, including extensive knowledge of accounting, auditing and investments in both public and private companies. Additionally, through his service on public company boards, Mr. Hasler has gained an understanding and expertise in public company governance. Mr. Clifford H. Higgerson, age 75, has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. He has more than 40 years of experience in research, consulting, planning and venture investing primarily in the telecommunications industry, with an emphasis on carrier systems and equipment. In 2006, he became a partner with Walden International, a global venture capital firm focused on four key industry sectors: communications, electronics/digital consumer software and IT services, and semiconductors. Mr. Higgerson was a founding partner of ComVentures from 1986 to 2005, and has been a general partner with Vanguard Venture Partners since 1991. He currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Kotura Inc., Xtera Communications Inc., Ygnition Networks, Inc., Ormet Circuits, Inc., Thrupoint, Inc. and Geronimo Windpower. He served as a member of the Stratex board of directors from March 2006 to January 2007 and served on the Compensation and Strategic Business Development Committees. He previously served as a member of the board of directors of Hatteras Networks Inc. and World of Good. PART III Directors’ Biographies Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Officers Board Members Information regarding our executive officers appears in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The authorized size of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) is currently eight. Directors are nominated by the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. Except for Mr. Rau, who was elected to the Board on November 9, 2010, and Mr. Pangia, who was elected to the Board on July 18, 2011, all current directors have held office as directors since January 26, 2007, the date of the merger of the Microwave Communications Division (“MCD”) of Harris Corporation (“Harris”) with Stratex Networks, Inc. (“Stratex”), The Board is chaired by Mr. Kissner. The current members of the Board are: Name Title and Positions Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, Chairman of the Board William A. Hasler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Clifford H. Higgerson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Michael A. Pangia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director, President and CEO Raghavendra Rau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Dr. Mohsen Sohi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lead Independent Director Edward F. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director The Board has determined that each of our current directors except Mr. Kissner and Mr. Pangia has no relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and is otherwise independent in accordance with listing rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market (the “NASDAQ Listing Rules”). All of our directors are requested to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. Seven of our directors attended the 2013 Annual Meeting. During fiscal year 2014, the Board held nine meetings. Each of the board members attended at least 77% of the total number of Board meetings and at least 78% of the total number of meetings of the committee or committees on Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance which the member served during fiscal year 2014. Board Member Qualifications Our Board believes that its members should encompass a range of talents, skills and expertise, which enables the Board to provide sound guidance with respect to the Company’s operations and interest. Our Board prefers a variety of professional experiences and backgrounds among its members. In addition to considering a candidate’s experiences and background, candidates are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board and evolving needs of our businesses. In particular, the Board has sought to include members that have experience in establishing, growing and leading communications companies in senior management positions and serving on the board of directors of other companies. In determining that each of the members of the Board is qualified to be a director, the Board has relied on the attributes listed below and, where applicable, on the direct personal knowledge of each of the members’ prior service on the Board. The following is a brief description of the business experience and background of each nominee for director, including the capacities in which each has served during at least the past five years: Mr. Charles D. Kissner, age 67, currently serves as our Chairman of the Board. Mr. Kissner served as our Executive Chairman from July 2011 to July 2012 and again from July 2014 to December 2014, and served as non- Executive Chairman from July 2012 to July 2014. Mr. Kissner served as CEO and Chairman of the Board of Aviat from July 2010 to July 2011. He was CEO of Stratex from July 1995 through May 2000, and again from October 2001 to May 2006. He was elected a director of Stratex in July 1995 and Chairman in August 1996. Mr. Kissner also served as Vice President and General Manager of M/A-COM, Inc., a manufacturer of radio and microwave communications products, from July 1993 to July 1995. Prior to that, he was President and CEO of Aristacom International Inc., a communications software company, and Executive Vice President and a Director of Fujitsu Network Switching, Inc. He also held a number of executive positions at AT&T (now Alcatel-Lucent). Mr. Kissner currently serves as Chairman of the board of directors of ShoreTel, Inc., an IP business telephony systems company. He also serves on the board of directors of Meru Networks Inc., a provider of advanced enterprise wireless networking systems, Rambus, Inc., a technology licensing company focusing on the development of technologies that enrich the end-user experience of electronic systems, and KQED Public Media, a non-profit organization. Mr. Kissner brings extensive knowledge of our business, having served on our Board as non-executive Chairman for over three years. He also brings nearly fifteen years of relevant CEO experience having served in that capacity at technology driven companies such as Stratex and Aristacom. Mr. Kissner also brings extensive public company directorship and committee experience to the Board which has been an invaluable resource as our company regularly assesses its corporate governance, corporate compliance and risk management obligations. Mr. Kissner has also directly supervised nearly thirty merger and acquisition activities, which experience has been vital to the assessment and integration of acquisition opportunities. A n n u a l R e p o r t Mr. William A. Hasler, age 73, has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. He also serves on the board of directors of Globalstar, Inc., a supplier of satellite communication services, and Rubicon, Ltd., which holds subsidiaries focused in forestry biotechnology. Mr. Hasler served as a member of the Stratex board of directors from August 2001 through January 2007, and was Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Hasler served as Chairman of the board of directors of Solectron Corporation from 2003 to 2007 and was a member of that board from 1998 to 2007. He was co-CEO and a Director of Aphton Corp., a biopharmaceutical company, from 1998 to 2003. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Hasler was Dean of both the Graduate and Undergraduate Schools of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to his deanship at UC Berkeley, Mr. Hasler was Vice Chairman of KPMG Peat Marwick. He also served as a trustee of Schwab Funds. Mr. Hasler’s current and prior service on the boards of several technology-driven companies, including Ditech, Globalstar and Rubicon, and his prior service as Chairman of a large publicly traded company provide him with an extensive knowledge base of complex management, financial, operational and governance issues faced by public companies with international operations. He is a member of the audit committee of various public and private companies. Mr. Hasler has extensive experience in Silicon Valley companies and this experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to corporate finance and accounting, strategic planning, manufacturing and operations. He brings valuable financial expertise, including extensive knowledge of accounting, auditing and investments in both public and private companies. Additionally, through his service on public company boards, Mr. Hasler has gained an understanding and expertise in public company governance. Mr. Clifford H. Higgerson, age 75, has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. He has more than 40 years of experience in research, consulting, planning and venture investing primarily in the telecommunications industry, with an emphasis on carrier systems and equipment. In 2006, he became a partner with Walden International, a global venture capital firm focused on four key industry sectors: communications, electronics/digital consumer software and IT services, and semiconductors. Mr. Higgerson was a founding partner of ComVentures from 1986 to 2005, and has been a general partner with Vanguard Venture Partners since 1991. He currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Kotura Inc., Xtera Communications Inc., Ygnition Networks, Inc., Ormet Circuits, Inc., Thrupoint, Inc. and Geronimo Windpower. He served as a member of the Stratex board of directors from March 2006 to January 2007 and served on the Compensation and Strategic Business Development Committees. He previously served as a member of the board of directors of Hatteras Networks Inc. and World of Good. 85 Mr. Higgerson has more than 35 years of experience in research, consulting, planning and venture investing. He has and development, new product introductions, strategic planning, manufacturing, operations and corporate finance. His served on the boards of other public companies and served as a chair of the audit committee for publicly listed companies. His prior Board experience and his experience in research, strategic planning and corporate finance in technology driven companies provide him with extensive knowledge of complex issues involved in new product development, strategic planning, and financial and governance issues faced by public companies. His extensive experience with private equity firms and investing provides him with critical experience related to capital raising, economic analysis and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Michael A Pangia, age 53, has been our President and CEO and a member of the Board since July 18, 2011. From March 2009 to July 2011, he served as our Chief Sales Officer where he was responsible for company-wide operations of the Global Sales and Services organization. Prior to joining Aviat, Mr. Pangia served as senior vice president, Global Sales Operations and Strategy, at Nortel, where he was responsible for all operational aspects of the Global Sales function. Prior to that, he was president of Nortel’s Asia region, where his key responsibilities included sales and overall business management for all countries in the region where Nortel did business. Mr. Pangia’s current and prior service as a senior executive officer with large technology driven companies with Corporation, International Business Machines and Lockheed Missiles and Space Company. Mr. Thompson has t r o p e R l a u n n A international operations provide him with an extensive knowledge base of complex management, financial, operational and governance issues faced by public companies with global operations. He also brings a high level of financial literacy to the Board through both formal education and over 15 years’ experience in multiple finance functional areas, including cost accounting, financial planning and analysis, and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Raghavendra Rau, age 65, has served as a member of the Board since November 2010. Mr. Rau most recently served as CEO and a member on the board of directors of SeaChange International Inc., a provider of software based digital video platforms and related services to cable, telecommunications and broadcast television service providers worldwide. In addition, he is a member of the board of iProf, an e-learning company. Previously, Mr. Rau served as a member of the board of directors of Microtune, Inc., prior to its acquisition by Zoran, Inc., from May 2010 to December 2010. Mr. Rau served as Senior Vice President of the Mobile TV Solutions Business of Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”), from May 2007 until January 2008, and as Senior Vice President of Strategy and Business Development, Networks & Enterprise of Motorola from March 2006 to May 2007. Mr. Rau served as Corporate Vice President of Global Marketing and Strategy for Motorola from 2005 to 2006, and as Corporate Vice President, Marketing and Professional Services, from 2001 to 2005. From October 1992 to 2001, Mr. Rau served in various positions within Motorola, including as Vice President of Strategic Business Planning and Vice President of Sales and Operations and held positions in Asia and Europe. Mr. Rau is a former Chairman of the QuEST Forum, a collaboration of service providers and suppliers dedicated to telecom supply chain quality and performance, and was a Director of the Center for Telecom Management at the University of Southern California. Mr. Rau also served on the Motorola Partnership Board of France Telecom. Mr. Rau’s financial and business expertise, including his diversified background in global marketing, business strategy, venture capital and market development for communications and high-technology companies, provides him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director. Dr. James C. Stoffel, age 68, currently serves as our lead independent director and has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. Presently, Dr. Stoffel is on the board of directors of Harris Corporation, of which he has been a member since August 2003, and is also a member of its Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee and Corporate Governance Committee. Additionally, he serves as General Partner of Trillium International, LLC, a private equity company, and is a senior advisor to other private equity companies. He also serves on the boards of the following privately held companies:Display Data, Omni-ID Ltd., Quintel Ltd., Clear Momentum and Intrinsiq Ltd. Prior to his retirement, Dr. Stoffel was Senior Vice President, Chief Technical Officer and Director of Research and Development of Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”). He held this position from 2000 to April 2005. He joined Kodak in 1997 as Vice President and Director, Electronic Imaging Products Research and Development, and became Director of Research and Engineering in 1998. Prior to joining Kodak, he was with Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”), where he began his career in 1972. His most recent position with Xerox was Vice President, Corporate Research and Technology. Dr. Stoffel serves on the Advisory Board for Research and Graduate Studies at the University of Notre Dame and is a member of the advisory board of the Applied Science and Technology Research Institute, Hong Kong. Dr. Stoffel’s prior service as a senior executive of large, publicly traded, technology driven companies, and his more than 30 years’ experience focused on technology development, provide him with an extensive knowledge of the complex technical research and development, management, financial and governance issues faced by a public company with international operations. This experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to research 86 experience as an advisor to private equity firms also provides him with additional knowledge related to strategic planning, capital raising, mergers and acquisitions and economic analysis. Dr. Stoffel also has gained an understanding of public company governance and executive compensation through his service on public company boards, including as a lead independent director. Mr. Edward F. Thompson, age 76, has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. He is currently a member of the board of directors of ShoreTel, Inc., an IP business telephony systems company, InnoPath Software, Inc., ReachLocal Inc., an internet marketing company and XBridge Systems, Inc. a mainframe data discovery company. He is on the Advisory Board of Santa Clara University’s Leavey School of Business. Mr. Thompson served as a member of the Stratex board of directors from November 2002 through January 2007, where he was Chairman of the Audit Committee, and served on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Thompson was a consultant to Fujitsu Labs of America from 1995 to 2011. From 1976 to 1994, he held various positions at Amdahl Corporation, a multinational manufacturer of large scale computer systems, including CFO and Corporate Secretary, as well as Chairman and CEO of Amdahl Capital Corporation. Mr. Thompson also held positions at U.S. Leasing International, Inc., Computer Sciences contributed as a director or advisor to a number of companies, including Fujitsu, Ltd. and several of its subsidiaries, and SonicWALL Inc., a provider of Internet security solutions. Mr. Thompson brings a high level of financial literacy to the Board and substantial public company directorship and committee experience. He is currently designated as an audit committee financial expert and is the audit committee chair on all three public company boards on which he is a member, as well as privately held InnoPath Software. Mr. Thompson’s experience with accounting principles, financial reporting rules and regulations, evaluation of financial results and oversight of the financial reporting process of publicly traded companies makes him a valuable asset to the Board. Mr. Thompson also brings to the Board significant experience in international operations based upon his past experience as a senior advisor to Fujitsu, as a director of several Fujitsu subsidiaries and portfolio companies and as CFO of Amdahl. Board Leadership The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board. The members of the Board possess considerable experience and unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities that the Company faces, and are in the best position to evaluate the needs of the Company and how to best organize the capabilities of the directors and management to meet those needs. When the CEO also serves as Chairman of the Board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for the appointment of a lead independent director. Accordingly, when our Chairman Charles Kissner was appointed CEO in June 2010, the Board appointed James Stoffel, an independent director, as lead independent director. Although, currently, the roles of the CEO and the Chairman remain separate, upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has determined to continue the role of the lead independent director for the present time. The lead independent director is responsible for coordinating the activities of the other independent directors and has the authority to preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors. The lead independent director may also recommend the retention of outside advisors and consultants who report directly to the Board. The Board believes that appointing a lead independent director to serve along with a CEO and a non-executive Chairman of the Board has enhanced the Board’s oversight of, and independence from, Company management, the ability of the Board to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of our stockholders and our overall corporate governance. The Board has determined that having Mr. Kissner serve as Chairman is in the best interest of the Company at this time. This structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of the Company and active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing Board priorities and procedures, and is useful in establishing a system of corporate checks and balances. Separating the Chairman position from the CEO position allows the CEO to focus on setting the strategic direction of the Company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman leads the Board in its role of, among other things, providing advice to, Mr. Higgerson has more than 35 years of experience in research, consulting, planning and venture investing. He has served on the boards of other public companies and served as a chair of the audit committee for publicly listed companies. His prior Board experience and his experience in research, strategic planning and corporate finance in technology driven companies provide him with extensive knowledge of complex issues involved in new product development, strategic planning, and financial and governance issues faced by public companies. His extensive experience with private equity firms and investing provides him with critical experience related to capital raising, economic analysis and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Michael A Pangia, age 53, has been our President and CEO and a member of the Board since July 18, 2011. From March 2009 to July 2011, he served as our Chief Sales Officer where he was responsible for company-wide operations of the Global Sales and Services organization. Prior to joining Aviat, Mr. Pangia served as senior vice president, Global Sales Operations and Strategy, at Nortel, where he was responsible for all operational aspects of the Global Sales function. Prior to that, he was president of Nortel’s Asia region, where his key responsibilities included sales and overall business management for all countries in the region where Nortel did business. Mr. Pangia’s current and prior service as a senior executive officer with large technology driven companies with international operations provide him with an extensive knowledge base of complex management, financial, operational and governance issues faced by public companies with global operations. He also brings a high level of financial literacy to the Board through both formal education and over 15 years’ experience in multiple finance functional areas, including cost accounting, financial planning and analysis, and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Raghavendra Rau, age 65, has served as a member of the Board since November 2010. Mr. Rau most recently served as CEO and a member on the board of directors of SeaChange International Inc., a provider of software based digital video platforms and related services to cable, telecommunications and broadcast television service providers worldwide. In addition, he is a member of the board of iProf, an e-learning company. Previously, Mr. Rau served as a member of the board of directors of Microtune, Inc., prior to its acquisition by Zoran, Inc., from May 2010 to December 2010. Mr. Rau served as Senior Vice President of the Mobile TV Solutions Business of Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”), from May 2007 until January 2008, and as Senior Vice President of Strategy and Business Development, Networks & Enterprise of Motorola from March 2006 to May 2007. Mr. Rau served as Corporate Vice President of Global Marketing and Strategy for Motorola from 2005 to 2006, and as Corporate Vice President, Marketing and Professional Services, from 2001 to 2005. From October 1992 to 2001, Mr. Rau served in various positions within Motorola, including as Vice President of Strategic Business Planning and Vice President of Sales and Operations and held positions in Asia and Europe. Mr. Rau is a former Chairman of the QuEST Forum, a collaboration of service providers and suppliers dedicated to telecom supply chain quality and performance, and was a Director of the Center for Telecom Management at the University of Southern California. Mr. Rau also served on the Motorola Partnership Board of France Telecom. Mr. Rau’s financial and business expertise, including his diversified background in global marketing, business strategy, venture capital and market development for communications and high-technology companies, provides him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director. Dr. James C. Stoffel, age 68, currently serves as our lead independent director and has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. Presently, Dr. Stoffel is on the board of directors of Harris Corporation, of which he has been a member since August 2003, and is also a member of its Business Conduct and Corporate Responsibility Committee and Corporate Governance Committee. Additionally, he serves as General Partner of Trillium International, LLC, a private equity company, and is a senior advisor to other private equity companies. He also serves on the boards of the following privately held companies:Display Data, Omni-ID Ltd., Quintel Ltd., Clear Momentum and Intrinsiq Ltd. Prior to his retirement, Dr. Stoffel was Senior Vice President, Chief Technical Officer and Director of Research and Development of Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”). He held this position from 2000 to April 2005. He joined Kodak in 1997 as Vice President and Director, Electronic Imaging Products Research and Development, and became Director of Research and Engineering in 1998. Prior to joining Kodak, he was with Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”), where he began his career in 1972. His most recent position with Xerox was Vice President, Corporate Research and Technology. Dr. Stoffel serves on the Advisory Board for Research and Graduate Studies at the University of Notre Dame and is a member of the advisory board of the Applied Science and Technology Research Institute, Hong Kong. Dr. Stoffel’s prior service as a senior executive of large, publicly traded, technology driven companies, and his more than 30 years’ experience focused on technology development, provide him with an extensive knowledge of the complex technical research and development, management, financial and governance issues faced by a public company with international operations. This experience brings our Board important knowledge and expertise related to research and development, new product introductions, strategic planning, manufacturing, operations and corporate finance. His experience as an advisor to private equity firms also provides him with additional knowledge related to strategic planning, capital raising, mergers and acquisitions and economic analysis. Dr. Stoffel also has gained an understanding of public company governance and executive compensation through his service on public company boards, including as a lead independent director. Mr. Edward F. Thompson, age 76, has served as a member of the Board since January 2007. He is currently a member of the board of directors of ShoreTel, Inc., an IP business telephony systems company, InnoPath Software, Inc., ReachLocal Inc., an internet marketing company and XBridge Systems, Inc. a mainframe data discovery company. He is on the Advisory Board of Santa Clara University’s Leavey School of Business. Mr. Thompson served as a member of the Stratex board of directors from November 2002 through January 2007, where he was Chairman of the Audit Committee, and served on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Thompson was a consultant to Fujitsu Labs of America from 1995 to 2011. From 1976 to 1994, he held various positions at Amdahl Corporation, a multinational manufacturer of large scale computer systems, including CFO and Corporate Secretary, as well as Chairman and CEO of Amdahl Capital Corporation. Mr. Thompson also held positions at U.S. Leasing International, Inc., Computer Sciences Corporation, International Business Machines and Lockheed Missiles and Space Company. Mr. Thompson has contributed as a director or advisor to a number of companies, including Fujitsu, Ltd. and several of its subsidiaries, and SonicWALL Inc., a provider of Internet security solutions. Mr. Thompson brings a high level of financial literacy to the Board and substantial public company directorship and committee experience. He is currently designated as an audit committee financial expert and is the audit committee chair on all three public company boards on which he is a member, as well as privately held InnoPath Software. Mr. Thompson’s experience with accounting principles, financial reporting rules and regulations, evaluation of financial results and oversight of the financial reporting process of publicly traded companies makes him a valuable asset to the Board. Mr. Thompson also brings to the Board significant experience in international operations based upon his past experience as a senior advisor to Fujitsu, as a director of several Fujitsu subsidiaries and portfolio companies and as CFO of Amdahl. A n n u a l R e p o r t Board Leadership The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board. The members of the Board possess considerable experience and unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities that the Company faces, and are in the best position to evaluate the needs of the Company and how to best organize the capabilities of the directors and management to meet those needs. When the CEO also serves as Chairman of the Board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for the appointment of a lead independent director. Accordingly, when our Chairman Charles Kissner was appointed CEO in June 2010, the Board appointed James Stoffel, an independent director, as lead independent director. Although, currently, the roles of the CEO and the Chairman remain separate, upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has determined to continue the role of the lead independent director for the present time. The lead independent director is responsible for coordinating the activities of the other independent directors and has the authority to preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors. The lead independent director may also recommend the retention of outside advisors and consultants who report directly to the Board. The Board believes that appointing a lead independent director to serve along with a CEO and a non-executive Chairman of the Board has enhanced the Board’s oversight of, and independence from, Company management, the ability of the Board to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of our stockholders and our overall corporate governance. The Board has determined that having Mr. Kissner serve as Chairman is in the best interest of the Company at this time. This structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of the Company and active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing Board priorities and procedures, and is useful in establishing a system of corporate checks and balances. Separating the Chairman position from the CEO position allows the CEO to focus on setting the strategic direction of the Company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman leads the Board in its role of, among other things, providing advice to, 87 For purposes of this policy, “Qualified Independent Directors” means all directors who (i) are independent directors (as defined in accordance with the NASDAQ Listing Rules); and (ii) are not required to offer their resignation in connection with an election in accordance with this majority voting policy. If there are fewer than three independent directors then serving on the Board who are not required to offer their resignations in accordance with this majority voting policy, then the Qualified Independent Directors means all of the independent directors, and each independent director who is required to offer his resignation in accordance with this majority voting policy must recuse himself from the deliberations and voting only with respect to his individual offer to resign. All nominees for election as a director in an uncontested election are deemed to have agreed to abide by this majority voting policy and will offer to resign and will resign if requested to do so in accordance with this majority voting policy (and will, if requested, submit an irrevocable resignation letter, subject to this majority voting policy, as a condition to being nominated for election). Prohibition Against Pledging Aviat Securities and Hedging Transactions. In accordance with Aviat’s Code of transactions with respect to Aviat securities. Aviat specifically prohibits directors and executive officers from holding Aviat securities in any margin account for investment purposes or otherwise using Aviat securities as collateral for a loan. Such persons are also prohibited from purchasing certain instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, and collars) and engaging in transactions designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the value of Aviat The Board maintains an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Governance and Nominating Committee. Copies of the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee are available on our website www.investors.aviatnetworks.com/documents.cfm. The following table shows, for fiscal year 2014, the Chairman and members of each committee, the number of committee meetings held and the principal functions performed by each committee. and overseeing the performance of, the CEO. In addition, managing the Board can be a time-intensive responsibility, and this structure permits Mr. Pangia, our CEO, to focus on the management of the Company’s day-to-day operations. offered by any other director in accordance with this policy. Prior to voting, the Qualified Independent Directors may afford the affected director an opportunity to provide any information or statement that he or she deems relevant. The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight Assessing and managing risk is the responsibility of the management of the Company. The Board, through the Governance and Nominating Committee, oversees and reviews certain aspects of the Company’s risk management efforts, focusing on the adequacy of the Company’s risk management and risk mitigation processes. At the Board’s request, management proposed a process for identifying, evaluating and monitoring material risks and such process has been approved by the Board and is currently in effect. This risk management program is overseen by senior management who, in connection with their regular review of the overall business, identify and prioritize a broad range of material risks (e.g., financial, strategic, compliance and operational). Senior management also discusses mitigation plans to address such material risks. Prioritized risks and management’s plans for mitigating such risks are regularly presented to the full Board for discussion and in order to ensure monitoring. In addition to the risk management program, the Board encourages management to promote a corporate culture that incorporates risk management into the Company’s corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. A discussion of risk factors in the Company’s compensation design can be found below under the heading “Risk Conduct, directors and executive officers are prohibited from pledging Aviat securities and engaging in hedging t r o p e R l a u n n A Considerations in Our Compensation Program”. Principles of Corporate Governance, Bylaws and Other Governance Documents The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance documents that supplement certain provisions of our Bylaws and relate to, among other things, the composition, structure, interaction and operation of the Board. Some of the key governance features of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Bylaws and other governance documents are summarized below. securities. Board Committees Majority Vote Policy in Director Elections. Aviat’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any nominee for director in an uncontested election (i.e., an election where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected) who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his election than votes “for” such election must, promptly following certification of the stockholder vote, offer his resignation to the Board for consideration in accordance with the following procedures. All of these procedures will be completed within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. The Board, through its Qualified Independent Directors (as defined below), will evaluate the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and decides the action to be taken with respect to such offered resignation, which can include, without limitation: (i) accepting the resignation; (ii) accepting the resignation effective as of a future date not later than 180 days following certification of the stockholder vote; (iii) rejecting the resignation but addressing what the Qualified Independent Directors believe to be the underlying cause of the withhold votes; (iv) rejecting the resignation but resolving that the director will not be re-nominated in the future for election; or (v) rejecting the resignation. In reaching their decision, the Qualified Independent Directors will consider all factors they deem relevant, including but not limited to: (i) any stated reasons why stockholders withheld votes from such director; (ii) the extent to which the “withhold” votes exceed the votes “for” the election of the director and whether the “withhold” votes represent a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock; (iii) any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes; (iv) the director’s tenure; (v) the director’s qualifications; (vi) the director’s past and expected future contributions to the Company; (vii) the overall composition of the Board, including whether accepting the resignation would cause the Company to fail or potentially fail to comply with any applicable law, rule or regulation of the SEC or the NASDAQ Listing Rules; and (viii) whether such director’s continued service on the Board for a specified period of time is appropriate in light of current or anticipated events involving the Company. Following the Board’s determination, the Company will, within four business days, disclose publicly in a document furnished or filed with the SEC the Board’s decision as to whether or not to accept the resignation offer. The disclosure will also include a description of the process by which the decision was reached, including, if applicable, the reason or reasons for rejecting the offered resignation. A director who is required to offer his or her resignation in accordance with this policy may not be present during the deliberations or voting whether to accept his or her resignation or, except as otherwise provided below, a resignation 88 and overseeing the performance of, the CEO. In addition, managing the Board can be a time-intensive responsibility, and this structure permits Mr. Pangia, our CEO, to focus on the management of the Company’s day-to-day operations. offered by any other director in accordance with this policy. Prior to voting, the Qualified Independent Directors may afford the affected director an opportunity to provide any information or statement that he or she deems relevant. The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight Assessing and managing risk is the responsibility of the management of the Company. The Board, through the Governance and Nominating Committee, oversees and reviews certain aspects of the Company’s risk management efforts, focusing on the adequacy of the Company’s risk management and risk mitigation processes. At the Board’s request, management proposed a process for identifying, evaluating and monitoring material risks and such process has been approved by the Board and is currently in effect. This risk management program is overseen by senior management who, in connection with their regular review of the overall business, identify and prioritize a broad range of material risks (e.g., financial, strategic, compliance and operational). Senior management also discusses mitigation plans to address such material risks. Prioritized risks and management’s plans for mitigating such risks are regularly presented to the full Board for discussion and in order to ensure monitoring. In addition to the risk management program, the Board encourages management to promote a corporate culture that incorporates risk management into the Company’s corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. A discussion of risk factors in the Company’s compensation design can be found below under the heading “Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program”. Principles of Corporate Governance, Bylaws and Other Governance Documents The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance documents that supplement certain provisions of our Bylaws and relate to, among other things, the composition, structure, interaction and operation of the Board. Some of the key governance features of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Bylaws and other governance documents are summarized below. Majority Vote Policy in Director Elections. Aviat’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any nominee for director in an uncontested election (i.e., an election where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected) who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his election than votes “for” such election must, promptly following certification of the stockholder vote, offer his resignation to the Board for consideration in accordance with the following procedures. All of these procedures will be completed within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. The Board, through its Qualified Independent Directors (as defined below), will evaluate the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and decides the action to be taken with respect to such offered resignation, which can include, without limitation: (i) accepting the resignation; (ii) accepting the resignation effective as of a future date not later than 180 days following certification of the stockholder vote; (iii) rejecting the resignation but addressing what the Qualified Independent Directors believe to be the underlying cause of the withhold votes; (iv) rejecting the resignation but resolving that the director will not be re-nominated in the future for election; or (v) rejecting the resignation. In reaching their decision, the Qualified Independent Directors will consider all factors they deem relevant, including but not limited to: (i) any stated reasons why stockholders withheld votes from such director; (ii) the extent to which the “withhold” votes exceed the votes “for” the election of the director and whether the “withhold” votes represent a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock; (iii) any alternatives for curing the underlying cause of the withheld votes; (iv) the director’s tenure; (v) the director’s qualifications; (vi) the director’s past and expected future contributions to the Company; (vii) the overall composition of the Board, including whether accepting the resignation would cause the Company to fail or potentially fail to comply with any applicable law, rule or regulation of the SEC or the NASDAQ Listing Rules; and (viii) whether such director’s continued service on the Board for a specified period of time is appropriate in light of current or anticipated events involving the Company. Following the Board’s determination, the Company will, within four business days, disclose publicly in a document furnished or filed with the SEC the Board’s decision as to whether or not to accept the resignation offer. The disclosure will also include a description of the process by which the decision was reached, including, if applicable, the reason or reasons for rejecting the offered resignation. A director who is required to offer his or her resignation in accordance with this policy may not be present during the deliberations or voting whether to accept his or her resignation or, except as otherwise provided below, a resignation For purposes of this policy, “Qualified Independent Directors” means all directors who (i) are independent directors (as defined in accordance with the NASDAQ Listing Rules); and (ii) are not required to offer their resignation in connection with an election in accordance with this majority voting policy. If there are fewer than three independent directors then serving on the Board who are not required to offer their resignations in accordance with this majority voting policy, then the Qualified Independent Directors means all of the independent directors, and each independent director who is required to offer his resignation in accordance with this majority voting policy must recuse himself from the deliberations and voting only with respect to his individual offer to resign. All nominees for election as a director in an uncontested election are deemed to have agreed to abide by this majority voting policy and will offer to resign and will resign if requested to do so in accordance with this majority voting policy (and will, if requested, submit an irrevocable resignation letter, subject to this majority voting policy, as a condition to being nominated for election). Prohibition Against Pledging Aviat Securities and Hedging Transactions. In accordance with Aviat’s Code of Conduct, directors and executive officers are prohibited from pledging Aviat securities and engaging in hedging transactions with respect to Aviat securities. Aviat specifically prohibits directors and executive officers from holding Aviat securities in any margin account for investment purposes or otherwise using Aviat securities as collateral for a loan. Such persons are also prohibited from purchasing certain instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, and collars) and engaging in transactions designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the value of Aviat securities. Board Committees The Board maintains an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Governance and Nominating Committee. Copies of the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee are available on our website www.investors.aviatnetworks.com/documents.cfm. The following table shows, for fiscal year 2014, the Chairman and members of each committee, the number of committee meetings held and the principal functions performed by each committee. A n n u a l R e p o r t 89 Committee Audit . . . . . . . . . . . Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2014 19 Members Principal Functions Edward F. Thompson* William A. Hasler Raghavendra Rau • Selects our independent registered public accounting firm • Reviews reports of our independent registered public accounting firm • Reviews and pre-approves the scope and cost of all services, including all non-audit services, provided by the firm selected to conduct the audit • Monitors the effectiveness of the audit process • Reviews management’s assessment of the adequacy of financial reporting and operating controls • Monitors corporate compliance program Dr. James C. Stoffel* Clifford H. Higgerson Dr. Mohsen Sohi • Reviews our executive compensation policies and strategies • Oversees and evaluates our overall compensation structure and programs William A. Hasler* James C. Stoffel Clifford H. Higgerson • Develops and implements policies and practices relating to corporate governance • Reviews and monitors implementation of our policies and procedures • Reviews the process by which management identifies and mitigates key areas of risk and reviews critical risk areas with the Board • Assists in developing criteria for open positions on the Board • Reviews and recommends nominees for election of directors to the Board • Reviews and recommends policies, if needed for selection of candidates for directors Compensation . . . . Governance and Nominating . . . . 4 5 t r o p e R l a u n n A ________________ * Chairman of Committee Audit Committee The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for selecting, and approving the services performed by, our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as reviewing our accounting practices, corporate financial reporting and system of internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Thompson (Chairman), Hasler and Rau. No material amendments to the Audit Committee Charter were made during fiscal year 2014. The Audit Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of our Board who are “financially sophisticated” under the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Thompson and Hasler qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under Item 407(d)(5)(i) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act, but that status does not impose on either of them duties, liabilities or obligations that are greater than the duties, liabilities or obligations otherwise imposed on them as members of our Audit Committee and the Board. Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee has the authority and responsibility to approve our overall executive compensation strategy, to administer our annual and long-term compensation plans and to review and make recommendations to the 90 Board regarding executive compensation. The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rules. During fiscal year 2014, the Compensation Committee utilized Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) as an independent, third-party consulting firm. Compensation Committee Interlock and Insider Participation The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Stoffel (Chairman), Higgerson and Sohi. None of these individuals is an officer or employee or former officer of the Company. None of our executive officers currently serves or in the past year has served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee. Governance and Nominating Committee The Governance and Nominating Committee currently consists of Messrs. Hasler (Chairman), Higgerson, and Stoffel. Each member of the Governance and Nominating Committee meets the independence requirements of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Governance and Nominating Committee develops and implements policies and practices related to corporate governance consistent with sound corporate governance principles. The Governance and Nominating Committee also reviews the process by which management identifies and mitigates key areas of risk and reviews critical risk areas with the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee also recommends candidates to the Board and periodically reviews whether a more formal selection policy should be adopted. There is no difference in the manner in which the committee members evaluate nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder. We currently do not pay a third party to identify or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees, although we may in the future utilize the services of such third parties. In reviewing potential candidates for the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers the individual’s experience and background. Candidates for the position of director should exhibit proven leadership capabilities, high integrity, exercise high level responsibilities within their chosen career, and possess an ability to quickly grasp complex principles of business, finance, international transactions and communications technologies. In general, candidates who have held an established executive level position in business, finance, law, education, research, government or civic activity will be preferred. Although the Governance and Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy with regard to the selection of director nominees, diversity is one of the factors that the committee considers in identifying director nominees. When identifying and recommending director nominees, the Governance and Nominating Committee views diversity expansively to include, without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other qualities or attributes that contribute to board diversity. As part of this process, the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates how a particular candidate would strengthen and increase the diversity of the Board in terms of how that candidate may contribute to the Board’s overall balance of perspectives, backgrounds, knowledge, experience, skill sets and expertise in substantive matters pertaining to the Company’s business. In making its recommendations, the Governance and Nominating Committee bears in mind that the foremost responsibility of a director of a corporation is to represent the interests of the stockholders as a whole. The Governance and Nominating Committee intends to continue to evaluate candidates for election to the Board on the basis of the foregoing criteria. Stockholder Communications with the Board Stockholders who wish to communicate directly with the Board may do so by submitting a comment via the Company’s website at www.investors.aviatnetworks.com/contactBoard.cfm or by sending a letter addressed to: Aviat Networks, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054. The Corporate Secretary monitors these communications and provides a summary of all received messages to the Board at its regularly scheduled meetings. When warranted by the nature of communications, the Corporate Secretary will request prompt attention by Committee Members Principal Functions Audit . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Edward F. Thompson* • Selects our independent registered public Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2014 William A. Hasler Raghavendra Rau accounting firm Compensation . . . . • Reviews our executive compensation policies and Dr. James C. Stoffel* Clifford H. Higgerson Dr. Mohsen Sohi strategies 4 5 Governance and Nominating . . . . William A. Hasler* James C. Stoffel Clifford H. Higgerson • Reviews reports of our independent registered public accounting firm • Reviews and pre-approves the scope and cost of all services, including all non-audit services, provided by the firm selected to conduct the audit • Monitors the effectiveness of the audit process • Reviews management’s assessment of the adequacy of financial reporting and operating controls • Monitors corporate compliance program • Oversees and evaluates our overall compensation structure and programs • Develops and implements policies and practices relating to corporate governance • Reviews and monitors implementation of our policies and procedures • Reviews the process by which management identifies and mitigates key areas of risk and reviews critical risk areas with the Board • Assists in developing criteria for open positions on the Board • Reviews and recommends nominees for election of directors to the Board • Reviews and recommends policies, if needed for selection of candidates for directors ________________ * Chairman of Committee Audit Committee The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for selecting, and approving the services performed by, our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as reviewing our accounting practices, corporate financial reporting and system of internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Thompson (Chairman), Hasler and Rau. No material amendments to the Audit Committee Charter were made during fiscal year 2014. The Audit Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of our Board who are “financially sophisticated” under the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Thompson and Hasler qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under Item 407(d)(5)(i) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act, but that status does not impose on either of them duties, liabilities or obligations that are greater than the duties, liabilities or obligations otherwise imposed on them as members of our Audit Committee and the Board. Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee has the authority and responsibility to approve our overall executive compensation strategy, to administer our annual and long-term compensation plans and to review and make recommendations to the Board regarding executive compensation. The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rules. During fiscal year 2014, the Compensation Committee utilized Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) as an independent, third-party consulting firm. Compensation Committee Interlock and Insider Participation The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Stoffel (Chairman), Higgerson and Sohi. None of these individuals is an officer or employee or former officer of the Company. None of our executive officers currently serves or in the past year has served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee. Governance and Nominating Committee The Governance and Nominating Committee currently consists of Messrs. Hasler (Chairman), Higgerson, and Stoffel. Each member of the Governance and Nominating Committee meets the independence requirements of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Governance and Nominating Committee develops and implements policies and practices related to corporate governance consistent with sound corporate governance principles. The Governance and Nominating Committee also reviews the process by which management identifies and mitigates key areas of risk and reviews critical risk areas with the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee also recommends candidates to the Board and periodically reviews whether a more formal selection policy should be adopted. There is no difference in the manner in which the committee members evaluate nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder. We currently do not pay a third party to identify or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees, although we may in the future utilize the services of such third parties. In reviewing potential candidates for the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers the individual’s experience and background. Candidates for the position of director should exhibit proven leadership capabilities, high integrity, exercise high level responsibilities within their chosen career, and possess an ability to quickly grasp complex principles of business, finance, international transactions and communications technologies. In general, candidates who have held an established executive level position in business, finance, law, education, research, government or civic activity will be preferred. A n n u a l R e p o r t Although the Governance and Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy with regard to the selection of director nominees, diversity is one of the factors that the committee considers in identifying director nominees. When identifying and recommending director nominees, the Governance and Nominating Committee views diversity expansively to include, without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other qualities or attributes that contribute to board diversity. As part of this process, the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates how a particular candidate would strengthen and increase the diversity of the Board in terms of how that candidate may contribute to the Board’s overall balance of perspectives, backgrounds, knowledge, experience, skill sets and expertise in substantive matters pertaining to the Company’s business. In making its recommendations, the Governance and Nominating Committee bears in mind that the foremost responsibility of a director of a corporation is to represent the interests of the stockholders as a whole. The Governance and Nominating Committee intends to continue to evaluate candidates for election to the Board on the basis of the foregoing criteria. Stockholder Communications with the Board Stockholders who wish to communicate directly with the Board may do so by submitting a comment via the Company’s website at www.investors.aviatnetworks.com/contactBoard.cfm or by sending a letter addressed to: Aviat Networks, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054. The Corporate Secretary monitors these communications and provides a summary of all received messages to the Board at its regularly scheduled meetings. When warranted by the nature of communications, the Corporate Secretary will request prompt attention by 91 the appropriate committee or independent director of the Board, independent advisors or management. The Corporate Secretary may decide in her judgment whether a response to any stockholder communication is appropriate. Code of Conduct We implemented our Code of Conduct effective January 26, 2007. All of our employees, including the CEO, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer, are required to abide by the Code of Conduct to help ensure that our business is conducted in a consistently ethical and legal manner. The Audit Committee has adopted a written policy, and management has implemented a reporting system, intended to encourage our employees to bring to the attention of management and the Audit Committee any complaints regarding the integrity of our internal system of controls over financial reporting, or the accuracy or completeness of financial or other information related to our financial statements. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% some examples of this commitment: of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% holders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on our review of Forms 3 and 4 received during fiscal year 2014, and Forms 5 (or any written representations) received with respect to fiscal year 2014, we believe that all directors, officers, executive officers and 10% stockholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal year 2014. Item 11. Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis Overview and Summary This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which has been prepared by management, is intended to help our stockholders understand our executive compensation philosophy, objectives, elements, policies, practices, and decisions. It is also intended to provide context for the compensation information for our CEO, CFO and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (our “named executive officers”) detailed in the Summary Compensation Table below and in the other tables and narrative discussion that follow. t r o p e R l a u n n A To understand our approach to executive compensation, you should read the entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis that follows. The following brief summary introduces the major topics covered: • No perquisites: Our executive officers are not provided with club memberships, personal use of corporate aircraft or any other perquisite or special benefits other than our occasional provision of relocation expense • • • • • the cornerstone of our executive compensation program is pay for performance. Accordingly, while we pay competitive base salaries and other benefits, the majority of our named executive officers’ compensation opportunity is based on variable pay. the objectives of our executive compensation program are to reward superior performance, motivate our executives to achieve our goals and attract and retain a world-class management team. the Compensation Committee oversees our compensation program. The Compensation Committee makes most executive compensation decisions, but also makes recommendations on certain aspects of the program to the full Board. The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors. In its work, the Compensation Committee is assisted by independent compensation consultants engaged by the Compensation Committee. in reviewing the elements of our executive compensation program - base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives and post-termination compensation - our Compensation Committee reviews market data from similar companies. our competitive positioning philosophy is to set compensation at the 50th percentile of compensation at peer group companies with allowances for internal factors such as tenure, individual performances and the specific importance of the job to the Company. 92 • our annual incentive program is based on specific Company financial performance goals for the fiscal year, and includes provisions to “claw back” any excess amounts paid in the event of a later correction or restatement of our financial statements. The Company believes the compensation program for the named executive officers supported our strategic priorities and aligned compensation earned with the Company’s financial performance in fiscal year 2014. Moreover, we believe that in emphasizing long term stockholder value creation over short term operating results the structure of our executive compensation program has benefited our Company. Compensation Governance Best Practices The Compensation Committee believes that a demonstrated commitment to best practices in compensation governance is itself an essential component of our approach to executive compensation. The following practices are • Pay for Performance: A substantial portion of our executives’ compensation opportunity is tied to achieving specified corporate objectives. In fiscal year 2014, for example, 100% of the awards made to our executive officers under the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) were performance based and at-risk, subject to achievement of earnings per share (“EPS”) objectives. Under the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), 100% of fiscal year 2014 equity awards were in the form of stock options, which provide no value to our executives if our share price does not increase above the exercise price and vest ratably over three years, reinforcing the long-term focus of our executive compensation programs. • Mix of short term and long-term compensation: Short term compensation for our executive officers is comprised of base salaries and the AIP, which pays out only to the extent that the Company meets its financial targets. Long term compensation is composed of stock options which vest over a three year period. • Independent Compensation Consultant: The Compensation Committee directly retains the services of Pearl Meyer, an independent compensation consultant, to advise it in determining reasonable and market-based compensation policies. • Prohibition on hedging: Our executive officers, together with all other employees, are prohibited from engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities. reimbursement. reasons. • No single trigger change of control acceleration: All change of control arrangements with our executive officers provide for acceleration of vesting for outstanding equity awards only in the event that we are both subject to a change in control and the executive officer’s employment terminates thereafter for specified • Strong compensation risk management: The Compensation Committee reviews and analyzes the risk profile of our compensation programs and practices at least annually. Compensation Philosophy and Objectives The primary objectives of our total executive compensation program are to recruit, retain, and develop exceptional executives, incentivize those individuals to achieve strategic, operational, and financial goals, rewarding superior performance and aligning the long term interests of our executives with our stockholders. The following principles guide our overall compensation program: reward superior performance; • motivate our executives to achieve strategic, operational, and financial goals; enable us to attract and retain a world-class management team; and align outcomes and rewards with stockholder expectations. • • • the appropriate committee or independent director of the Board, independent advisors or management. The Corporate Secretary may decide in her judgment whether a response to any stockholder communication is appropriate. Code of Conduct • our annual incentive program is based on specific Company financial performance goals for the fiscal year, and includes provisions to “claw back” any excess amounts paid in the event of a later correction or restatement of our financial statements. We implemented our Code of Conduct effective January 26, 2007. All of our employees, including the CEO, CFO The Company believes the compensation program for the named executive officers supported our strategic and Principal Accounting Officer, are required to abide by the Code of Conduct to help ensure that our business is conducted in a consistently ethical and legal manner. The Audit Committee has adopted a written policy, and management has implemented a reporting system, intended to encourage our employees to bring to the attention of management and the Audit Committee any complaints regarding the integrity of our internal system of controls over priorities and aligned compensation earned with the Company’s financial performance in fiscal year 2014. Moreover, we believe that in emphasizing long term stockholder value creation over short term operating results the structure of our executive compensation program has benefited our Company. financial reporting, or the accuracy or completeness of financial or other information related to our financial statements. Compensation Governance Best Practices The Compensation Committee believes that a demonstrated commitment to best practices in compensation governance is itself an essential component of our approach to executive compensation. The following practices are some examples of this commitment: • Pay for Performance: A substantial portion of our executives’ compensation opportunity is tied to achieving specified corporate objectives. In fiscal year 2014, for example, 100% of the awards made to our executive officers under the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) were performance based and at-risk, subject to achievement of earnings per share (“EPS”) objectives. Under the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), 100% of fiscal year 2014 equity awards were in the form of stock options, which provide no value to our executives if our share price does not increase above the exercise price and vest ratably over three years, reinforcing the long-term focus of our executive compensation programs. • Mix of short term and long-term compensation: Short term compensation for our executive officers is comprised of base salaries and the AIP, which pays out only to the extent that the Company meets its financial targets. Long term compensation is composed of stock options which vest over a three year period. • Independent Compensation Consultant: The Compensation Committee directly retains the services of Pearl Meyer, an independent compensation consultant, to advise it in determining reasonable and market-based compensation policies. A n n u a l R e p o r t • Prohibition on hedging: Our executive officers, together with all other employees, are prohibited from engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities. • No perquisites: Our executive officers are not provided with club memberships, personal use of corporate aircraft or any other perquisite or special benefits other than our occasional provision of relocation expense reimbursement. • No single trigger change of control acceleration: All change of control arrangements with our executive officers provide for acceleration of vesting for outstanding equity awards only in the event that we are both subject to a change in control and the executive officer’s employment terminates thereafter for specified reasons. • Strong compensation risk management: The Compensation Committee reviews and analyzes the risk profile of our compensation programs and practices at least annually. Compensation Philosophy and Objectives The primary objectives of our total executive compensation program are to recruit, retain, and develop exceptional executives, incentivize those individuals to achieve strategic, operational, and financial goals, rewarding superior performance and aligning the long term interests of our executives with our stockholders. The following principles guide our overall compensation program: Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% holders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on our review of Forms 3 and 4 received during fiscal year 2014, and Forms 5 (or any written representations) received with respect to fiscal year 2014, we believe that all directors, officers, executive officers and 10% stockholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal year 2014. Item 11. Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis Overview and Summary This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which has been prepared by management, is intended to help our stockholders understand our executive compensation philosophy, objectives, elements, policies, practices, and decisions. It is also intended to provide context for the compensation information for our CEO, CFO and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (our “named executive officers”) detailed in the Summary Compensation Table below and in the other tables and narrative discussion that follow. To understand our approach to executive compensation, you should read the entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis that follows. The following brief summary introduces the major topics covered: • the cornerstone of our executive compensation program is pay for performance. Accordingly, while we pay competitive base salaries and other benefits, the majority of our named executive officers’ compensation opportunity is based on variable pay. • the objectives of our executive compensation program are to reward superior performance, motivate our executives to achieve our goals and attract and retain a world-class management team. • the Compensation Committee oversees our compensation program. The Compensation Committee makes most executive compensation decisions, but also makes recommendations on certain aspects of the program to the full Board. The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors. In its work, the Compensation Committee is assisted by independent compensation consultants engaged by the Compensation Committee. similar companies. • in reviewing the elements of our executive compensation program - base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives and post-termination compensation - our Compensation Committee reviews market data from • our competitive positioning philosophy is to set compensation at the 50th percentile of compensation at peer group companies with allowances for internal factors such as tenure, individual performances and the specific importance of the job to the Company. • • motivate our executives to achieve strategic, operational, and financial goals; • • enable us to attract and retain a world-class management team; and align outcomes and rewards with stockholder expectations. reward superior performance; 93 The Compensation Committee annually reviews the executive compensation program to ensure our executive compensation policies and programs remain appropriately aligned with evolving business needs and to consider best compensation practices. Our executive compensation programs are reviewed to ensure that they achieve a balance between providing strong retention and performance incentives to our executives while accommodating a meaningful and continuing effort to manage both the Company’s share burn rate and the dilutive effects of equity awards to the Company’s stockholders. Executive Compensation Process The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and implementing executive compensation policies and programs in a manner consistent with our compensation objectives and principles. The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, reviews and approves the features and design of our executive compensation program, and approves the compensation levels, individual bonus objectives and total compensation targets for our executive officers other than our CEO. The Board approves the compensation level, individual bonus objectives, and financial targets for our CEO. The Compensation Committee also monitors executive succession planning and monitors our performance as it relates to overall compensation policies for employees, including benefit and savings plans. t r o p e R l a u n n A In discharging its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee may engage outside consultants and consult with our Human Resources Department as well as internal and external legal or accounting advisors, as the Compensation Committee determines to be appropriate. The Compensation Committee considers recommendations from our CEO and senior management when making decisions regarding our executive compensation program and compensation of our executive officers. Following each fiscal year end, our CEO, assisted by our Human Resources Department, assesses the performance of all named executive officers and other officers. Following this annual performance review process, our CEO recommends base salary and incentive and equity awards for our named executive officers and other officers to the Compensation Committee. Based on input from our CEO and management, as well as from independent consultants, if any are used, and, in the case of the CEO’s compensation, the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the CEO’s performance, the Compensation Committee determines what changes, if any, should be made to the executive compensation program and either sets or recommends to the full Board the level of each compensation element for all of our officers. Independent Compensation Consultant for Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to engage the services of outside advisors, experts and others to assist it. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has hired Pearl Meyer as an independent consultant to advise the Committee on matters related to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. All services that Pearl Meyer provided Aviat in fiscal year 2014 were approved by the Committee and were related to executive or Board compensation. Pearl Meyer provides an annual review of the Company’s compensation practices, reviews and makes recommendations regarding the compensation peer groups, and provides independent input to the Compensation Committee on programs and practices. Compensation Committee Advisor Independence The Compensation Committee has considered the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules and related SEC rules finalized in 2012, and has found no conflict of interest in Pearl Meyer continuing to provide advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is also regularly advised by the Company’s primary outside counsel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (“WSGR”). Pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules and related SEC rules finalized in 2012, the Compensation Committee has found no conflict of interest in WSGR continuing to provide advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee intends to reassess the independence of its advisors at least annually. Consideration of Say on Pay Results We conducted our advisory vote on executive compensation last year at our annual meeting. Although this vote was not binding on the Board or us, we believe that it is important for our stockholders to have an opportunity to express their views regarding our executive compensation philosophy, program and practices as disclosed in our proxy statement on an annual basis. The Board and our Compensation Committee value stockholders’ opinions and, to the extent there is 94 any significant vote against the compensation of our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are warranted or appropriate. At our 2013 Annual Meeting, 93.85% of the votes cast on the advisory vote on executive compensation supported our named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement. Our Compensation Committee reviewed the favorable results of this advisory vote, noting the widespread support from our stockholders. Although none of our Compensation Committee’s subsequent actions or decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers were directly attributable to the results of the vote, our Compensation Committee took the vote outcome into consideration in the course of its deliberations. Our Compensation Committee believes that stockholder feedback and concerns on executive compensation matters should be considered as part of its deliberations and intends to consider the results of future advisory votes in its compensation review process. Competitive Benchmarking Our compensation program for all of our officers is addressed in the context of competitive compensation practices. Our management and Compensation Committee consider external data to assist in benchmarking total target compensation. For fiscal year 2014, targets for total cash and cash based compensation (base salary and short-term incentive), long-term incentives and total direct compensation (base salary and short-term and long-term incentives) for all officers were set based on data collected from our peer group companies (for Messrs. Pangia, Hayes and Stumpe) and from a published survey source, the Radford Global Technology Survey for our other named executive officers . In considering data from the Radford Global Technology Survey , we focused on results for technology companies with annual revenues of less than $500 million . The peer group companies selected for benchmarking are reflective of our market for executive talent and business line competitors. Also, the overall composition of the peer group reflects companies of similar complexity and size to us. For fiscal 2014, these peer group companies included: ADTRAN Inc. Bel Fuse, Inc. Calix, Inc. Harmonic Inc. Ixia Extreme Networks, Inc. Riverbed Technology, Inc. Symmetricom, Inc. Comtech Telecommunications, Corp. Aruba Networks, Inc. Black Box Corp. Finisar Corp. Infinera Corp. Plantronics Inc. Sonus Networks, Inc. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the appropriateness of the comparison group used for assessing the compensation of our CEO and other named executive officers. Modifications to the peer group since fiscal 2013 included removal of Loral Space & Communications, Inc. following the divestiture of its principal subsidiary Space Systems/ Loral, removal of Opnext, Inc. following its acquisition by Oclaro, removal of PowerWave Technologies following its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in January 2013, and removal of NETGEAR, Inc. and ViaSat, Inc. in recognition that these two companies had become dissimilar to us in size. We also added Bel Fuse, Inc. and Infinera Corp. to replace these removals and also to better align the revenue size of each of our peer group companies with our own. Data for our peer group companies was collected directly from these companies’ proxy statements. Total Compensation Elements Our executive compensation program includes four major elements: • • • • base salary annual cash incentive long-term compensation - equity incentives post-termination compensation The Compensation Committee annually reviews the executive compensation program to ensure our executive compensation policies and programs remain appropriately aligned with evolving business needs and to consider best compensation practices. Our executive compensation programs are reviewed to ensure that they achieve a balance between providing strong retention and performance incentives to our executives while accommodating a meaningful and continuing effort to manage both the Company’s share burn rate and the dilutive effects of equity awards to the Company’s stockholders. Executive Compensation Process The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and implementing executive compensation policies and programs in a manner consistent with our compensation objectives and principles. The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, reviews and approves the features and design of our executive compensation program, and approves the compensation levels, individual bonus objectives and total compensation targets for our executive officers other than our CEO. The Board approves the compensation level, individual bonus objectives, and financial targets for our CEO. The Compensation Committee also monitors executive succession planning and monitors our performance as it relates to overall compensation policies for employees, including benefit and savings plans. In discharging its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee may engage outside consultants and consult with our Human Resources Department as well as internal and external legal or accounting advisors, as the Compensation Committee determines to be appropriate. The Compensation Committee considers recommendations from our CEO and senior management when making decisions regarding our executive compensation program and compensation of our executive officers. Following each fiscal year end, our CEO, assisted by our Human Resources Department, assesses the performance of all named executive officers and other officers. Following this annual performance review process, our CEO recommends base salary and incentive and equity awards for our named executive officers and other officers to the Compensation Committee. Based on input from our CEO and management, as well as from independent consultants, if any are used, and, in the case of the CEO’s compensation, the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the CEO’s performance, the Compensation Committee determines what changes, if any, should be made to the executive compensation program and either sets or recommends to the full Board the level of each compensation element for all of our officers. Independent Compensation Consultant for Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to engage the services of outside advisors, experts and others to assist it. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has hired Pearl Meyer as an independent consultant to advise the Committee on matters related to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. All services that Pearl Meyer provided Aviat in fiscal year 2014 were approved by the Committee and were related to executive or Board compensation. Pearl Meyer provides an annual review of the Company’s compensation practices, reviews and makes recommendations regarding the compensation peer groups, and provides independent input to the Compensation Committee on programs and practices. Compensation Committee Advisor Independence The Compensation Committee has considered the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules and related SEC rules finalized in 2012, and has found no conflict of interest in Pearl Meyer continuing to provide advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is also regularly advised by the Company’s primary outside counsel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (“WSGR”). Pursuant to the NASDAQ Listing Rules and related SEC rules finalized in 2012, the Compensation Committee has found no conflict of interest in WSGR continuing to provide advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee intends to reassess the independence of its advisors at least annually. Consideration of Say on Pay Results We conducted our advisory vote on executive compensation last year at our annual meeting. Although this vote was not binding on the Board or us, we believe that it is important for our stockholders to have an opportunity to express their views regarding our executive compensation philosophy, program and practices as disclosed in our proxy statement on an annual basis. The Board and our Compensation Committee value stockholders’ opinions and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the compensation of our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are warranted or appropriate. At our 2013 Annual Meeting, 93.85% of the votes cast on the advisory vote on executive compensation supported our named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement. Our Compensation Committee reviewed the favorable results of this advisory vote, noting the widespread support from our stockholders. Although none of our Compensation Committee’s subsequent actions or decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers were directly attributable to the results of the vote, our Compensation Committee took the vote outcome into consideration in the course of its deliberations. Our Compensation Committee believes that stockholder feedback and concerns on executive compensation matters should be considered as part of its deliberations and intends to consider the results of future advisory votes in its compensation review process. Competitive Benchmarking Our compensation program for all of our officers is addressed in the context of competitive compensation practices. Our management and Compensation Committee consider external data to assist in benchmarking total target compensation. For fiscal year 2014, targets for total cash and cash based compensation (base salary and short-term incentive), long-term incentives and total direct compensation (base salary and short-term and long-term incentives) for all officers were set based on data collected from our peer group companies (for Messrs. Pangia, Hayes and Stumpe) and from a published survey source, the Radford Global Technology Survey for our other named executive officers . In considering data from the Radford Global Technology Survey , we focused on results for technology companies with annual revenues of less than $500 million . The peer group companies selected for benchmarking are reflective of our market for executive talent and business line competitors. Also, the overall composition of the peer group reflects companies of similar complexity and size to us. A n n u a l R e p o r t For fiscal 2014, these peer group companies included: ADTRAN Inc. Bel Fuse, Inc. Calix, Inc. Extreme Networks, Inc. Harmonic Inc. Ixia Riverbed Technology, Inc. Symmetricom, Inc. Aruba Networks, Inc. Black Box Corp. Comtech Telecommunications, Corp. Finisar Corp. Infinera Corp. Plantronics Inc. Sonus Networks, Inc. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the appropriateness of the comparison group used for assessing the compensation of our CEO and other named executive officers. Modifications to the peer group since fiscal 2013 included removal of Loral Space & Communications, Inc. following the divestiture of its principal subsidiary Space Systems/ Loral, removal of Opnext, Inc. following its acquisition by Oclaro, removal of PowerWave Technologies following its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in January 2013, and removal of NETGEAR, Inc. and ViaSat, Inc. in recognition that these two companies had become dissimilar to us in size. We also added Bel Fuse, Inc. and Infinera Corp. to replace these removals and also to better align the revenue size of each of our peer group companies with our own. Data for our peer group companies was collected directly from these companies’ proxy statements. Total Compensation Elements Our executive compensation program includes four major elements: • • • • base salary annual cash incentive long-term compensation - equity incentives post-termination compensation 95 Each named executive officer’s performance is measured against factors such as long and short-term strategic goals equipment impairment charges, adjustments to the pro forma tax rate, non-recurring income and other non-recurring and financial measures of our performance, including factors such as revenue, operating income, cash flow from operations and earnings per share. charges. Our compensation policy and practice is to target total compensation levels for all officers, including our named executive officers, nominally at the 50th percentile for similar positions as derived from the market composite data, assuming experience in the position and competent performance. The Compensation Committee may decide to target total compensation above or below the 50th percentile for similar positions in unique circumstances based on an individual’s background, experience, or position. Though compensation levels may differ among our named executive officers based upon competitive factors and the role, responsibilities and performance of each named executive officer, there are no material differences in our compensation policies or in the manner in which total direct compensation opportunity is determined for any of our named executive officers. Because our CEO has significantly greater duties, responsibilities and accountabilities than our other named executive officers, the total compensation opportunity for the CEO is higher than for our other named executive officers. In determining CEO and other named executive officer compensation, the Board also considers the ratio between our CEO’s compensation and the average compensation of our other named executive officers as compared with similar ratios for peer group companies. For fiscal year 2014, that ratio was 1.97 , compared to a median ratio of 1.37 in the peer group companies. Base Salary t r o p e R l a u n n A Base salaries are provided as compensation for day-to-day responsibilities and services to us. Executive salaries are reviewed annually. Our CEO generally makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee in August of each year regarding the base pay of each named executive officer (other than himself). The Compensation Committee considers each executive officer’s responsibilities, as well as the Company’s performance and recommended increases in base salary for select named executive officers and other officers. In fiscal year 2014, the CEO recommended and the Compensation Committee approved, that named executive base salaries be held flat at fiscal year 2013 levels. Additional details concerning the compensation for our named executive officers for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. Annual Incentive The short-term incentive element of our executive compensation program is currently comprised of our Annual Incentive Plan, or AIP. The CEO reviews his recommendations for each named executive officer with the Compensation Committee, taking into account benchmarked market data obtained from Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant. Based on recommendations by the CEO, and as specified in any applicable employment agreement, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board an annual incentive compensation target, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each executive officer in August. Each named executive officer’s target annual incentive percentage is benchmarked against the 50th percentile within the market composite for his or her specific role. The Compensation Committee also recommends to the Board specific Company financial performance measures and targets including the relative weighting and payout thresholds. The financial targets are aligned with our Board-approved annual operating plan, and during the year periodic reports are made to the Board about our performance compared with the targets. Under the AIP, a significant portion of the executive’s annual compensation is tied directly to our financial performance. The target amount of annual incentive compensation under our AIP, expressed as a percentage of base salary, generally increases with an executive’s level of management responsibility. AIP target incentive can represent up to 100% of the base cash compensation for our named executive officers and may be paid in the form of cash, stock or a combination of the two. If performance results meet target levels, our executives can earn up to a maximum of 100% of their target incentive. No incentive can be earned for performance below the minimum threshold. Equity awards under the AIP are granted under the 2007 Plan. For fiscal year 2014, the AIP provided for a cash payout and contained minimum, target and maximum performance thresholds based on the performance measures, using EPS as the performance metric. The threshold amounts were established in August 2013, and the plan provided for no payout if the minimum threshold was not met, a 50% payout if the minimum threshold was met and a 100% payout if the target was achieved. If the maximum target threshold was met, the plan was capped at 150% payout. The EPS performance thresholds for fiscal year 2014 were based on a non-GAAP measure that excluded share-based compensation, amortization of purchased technology, transactional tax assessments, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, excess and obsolete inventory writedowns associated with legacy products, costs related to liquidation of foreign subsidiaries, property plant and 96 Fiscal 2014 Annual Incentive Plan Metric Earnings Per Share Table 1 Minimum Threshold Tiers Target Maximum Threshold Results-Driven Entitlement Performance (As % of Financial Target) Payout (As % of Award Target) 50% 100% 150% 50% 100% 150% In fiscal year 2014, the AIP did not guarantee payout of the target amounts, and the Compensation Committee considered the EPS performance thresholds to be challenging. During the 2014 fiscal year, we did not achieve the minimum threshold target for AIP awards; therefore, no named executive officer received a cash payout. The minimum threshold target required the Company to achieve an EPS target of $.26, a target of EPS of $.31 or a maximum target of $.36 in order to achieve the respective payouts. Long-Term Compensation - Equity Incentives The Compensation Committee uses the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) as a means for determining awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock- based awards to our officers and other executives based on multi-year performance. All of the awards are granted under the 2007 Plan. Our LTIP is designed to motivate our executives to focus on achievement of our long-term financial goals. Equity awards motivate our executives to achieve our long-term goals and to the extent our results affect our stock price, link such results with the performance of our stock over a three to four year period. Using equity awards helps us to retain executives, encourage share ownership and maintain a direct link between our executive compensation program and the value and appreciation in the value of our stock. In fiscal year 2014, LTIP awards were composed solely of stock options. Stock options vested one third on the first anniversary of the grant date, with one third vesting each year thereafter. The Committee believes that stock options provide clear alignment with stockholder interests. Performance Shares. In past fiscal years, the Compensation Committee recommended performance share awards that are earned, if the performance criteria are met, at the end of a three year plan cycle. The maximum possible entitlement to performance shares will occur if 100% of the target is achieved. In addition, irrespective of Company performance versus target, there is no entitlement to performance shares unless the award recipient continues to be employed throughout the multi-year period. Performance shares are subject to repurchase by the Company at $0.01 per share if eligible employment ends during the performance measurement period and to the extent the maximum performance is not achieved during the performance measurement period. For fiscal year 2014, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, all of the performance based restricted shares under the fiscal year 2011 LTIP, were repurchased by the Company since the Compensation Committee determined that the threshold targets had not been met. For compensation planning purposes, awards of performance-based restricted stock are valued at the fair market value of the shares on the date of award, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. Stock Options. The Compensation Committee believes that stock options directly align the interests of executives and stockholders as the options only result in gain to the recipient if our stock price increases above the exercise price of the options. In addition, options are intended to help retain key employees because they vest over a period of time, and to assist in the hiring of new executives by replacing the value of stock options that may have been forfeited as a result of leaving a former employer. Generally, options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date. Typically, the Compensation Committee awards stock options that vest and become exercisable solely on the basis of continued employment, or other service, over three or four years. Duration of stock options (subject to the terms of the 2007 Plan) is seven years from grant date. For compensation planning purposes, awards of stock options are valued Each named executive officer’s performance is measured against factors such as long and short-term strategic goals and financial measures of our performance, including factors such as revenue, operating income, cash flow from equipment impairment charges, adjustments to the pro forma tax rate, non-recurring income and other non-recurring charges. operations and earnings per share. Our compensation policy and practice is to target total compensation levels for all officers, including our named executive officers, nominally at the 50th percentile for similar positions as derived from the market composite data, assuming experience in the position and competent performance. The Compensation Committee may decide to target total compensation above or below the 50th percentile for similar positions in unique circumstances based on an individual’s background, experience, or position. Though compensation levels may differ among our named executive officers based upon competitive factors and the role, responsibilities and performance of each named executive officer, there are no material differences in our compensation policies or in the manner in which total direct compensation opportunity is determined for any of our named executive officers. Because our CEO has significantly greater duties, responsibilities and accountabilities than our other named executive officers, the total compensation opportunity for the CEO is higher than for our other named executive officers. In determining CEO and other named executive officer compensation, the Board also considers the ratio between our CEO’s compensation and the average compensation of our other named executive officers as compared with similar ratios for peer group companies. For fiscal year 2014, that ratio was 1.97 , compared to a median ratio of 1.37 in the peer group companies. Base Salary Base salaries are provided as compensation for day-to-day responsibilities and services to us. Executive salaries are reviewed annually. Our CEO generally makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee in August of each year regarding the base pay of each named executive officer (other than himself). The Compensation Committee considers each executive officer’s responsibilities, as well as the Company’s performance and recommended increases in base salary for select named executive officers and other officers. In fiscal year 2014, the CEO recommended and the Compensation Committee approved, that named executive base salaries be held flat at fiscal year 2013 levels. Additional details concerning the compensation for our named executive officers for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. Annual Incentive The short-term incentive element of our executive compensation program is currently comprised of our Annual Incentive Plan, or AIP. The CEO reviews his recommendations for each named executive officer with the Compensation Committee, taking into account benchmarked market data obtained from Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant. Based on recommendations by the CEO, and as specified in any applicable employment agreement, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board an annual incentive compensation target, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each executive officer in August. Each named executive officer’s target annual incentive percentage is benchmarked against the 50th percentile within the market composite for his or her specific role. The Compensation Committee also recommends to the Board specific Company financial performance measures and targets including the relative weighting and payout thresholds. The financial targets are aligned with our Board-approved annual operating plan, and during the year periodic reports are made to the Board about our performance compared with the targets. Under the AIP, a significant portion of the executive’s annual compensation is tied directly to our financial performance. The target amount of annual incentive compensation under our AIP, expressed as a percentage of base salary, generally increases with an executive’s level of management responsibility. AIP target incentive can represent up to 100% of the base cash compensation for our named executive officers and may be paid in the form of cash, stock or a combination of the two. If performance results meet target levels, our executives can earn up to a maximum of 100% of their target incentive. No incentive can be earned for performance below the minimum threshold. Equity awards under the AIP are granted under the 2007 Plan. For fiscal year 2014, the AIP provided for a cash payout and contained minimum, target and maximum performance thresholds based on the performance measures, using EPS as the performance metric. The threshold amounts were established in August 2013, and the plan provided for no payout if the minimum threshold was not met, a 50% payout if the minimum threshold was met and a 100% payout if the target was achieved. If the maximum target threshold was met, the plan was capped at 150% payout. The EPS performance thresholds for fiscal year 2014 were based on a non-GAAP measure that excluded share-based compensation, amortization of purchased technology, transactional tax assessments, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring charges, excess and obsolete inventory writedowns associated with legacy products, costs related to liquidation of foreign subsidiaries, property plant and A n n u a l R e p o r t Metric Earnings Per Share Table 1 Fiscal 2014 Annual Incentive Plan Tiers Minimum Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Results-Driven Entitlement Performance (As % of Financial Target) 50% 100% 150% Payout (As % of Award Target) 50% 100% 150% In fiscal year 2014, the AIP did not guarantee payout of the target amounts, and the Compensation Committee considered the EPS performance thresholds to be challenging. During the 2014 fiscal year, we did not achieve the minimum threshold target for AIP awards; therefore, no named executive officer received a cash payout. The minimum threshold target required the Company to achieve an EPS target of $.26, a target of EPS of $.31 or a maximum target of $.36 in order to achieve the respective payouts. Long-Term Compensation - Equity Incentives The Compensation Committee uses the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) as a means for determining awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock- based awards to our officers and other executives based on multi-year performance. All of the awards are granted under the 2007 Plan. Our LTIP is designed to motivate our executives to focus on achievement of our long-term financial goals. Equity awards motivate our executives to achieve our long-term goals and to the extent our results affect our stock price, link such results with the performance of our stock over a three to four year period. Using equity awards helps us to retain executives, encourage share ownership and maintain a direct link between our executive compensation program and the value and appreciation in the value of our stock. In fiscal year 2014, LTIP awards were composed solely of stock options. Stock options vested one third on the first anniversary of the grant date, with one third vesting each year thereafter. The Committee believes that stock options provide clear alignment with stockholder interests. Performance Shares. In past fiscal years, the Compensation Committee recommended performance share awards that are earned, if the performance criteria are met, at the end of a three year plan cycle. The maximum possible entitlement to performance shares will occur if 100% of the target is achieved. In addition, irrespective of Company performance versus target, there is no entitlement to performance shares unless the award recipient continues to be employed throughout the multi-year period. Performance shares are subject to repurchase by the Company at $0.01 per share if eligible employment ends during the performance measurement period and to the extent the maximum performance is not achieved during the performance measurement period. For fiscal year 2014, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, all of the performance based restricted shares under the fiscal year 2011 LTIP, were repurchased by the Company since the Compensation Committee determined that the threshold targets had not been met. For compensation planning purposes, awards of performance-based restricted stock are valued at the fair market value of the shares on the date of award, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. Stock Options. The Compensation Committee believes that stock options directly align the interests of executives and stockholders as the options only result in gain to the recipient if our stock price increases above the exercise price of the options. In addition, options are intended to help retain key employees because they vest over a period of time, and to assist in the hiring of new executives by replacing the value of stock options that may have been forfeited as a result of leaving a former employer. Generally, options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date. Typically, the Compensation Committee awards stock options that vest and become exercisable solely on the basis of continued employment, or other service, over three or four years. Duration of stock options (subject to the terms of the 2007 Plan) is seven years from grant date. For compensation planning purposes, awards of stock options are valued 97 using the Black-Scholes valuation method, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. In fiscal year 2014, the Black-Scholes valuations were approximately 50% of the grant-date exercise price value of the shares subject to the option. Service-Based Restricted Stock. Service-based restricted stock awards are awards of stock at the start of a vesting period which is subject to repurchase for nominal consideration if the specified vesting conditions are not satisfied. In addition to their use as a component of the LTIP, awards of service-based restricted stock may be made on a selective basis to individual executives primarily to facilitate retention and succession planning or to replace the value of equity awards that may have been forfeited as a result of the executive’s leaving a former employer. For compensation planning purposes, awards of service-based restricted stock are valued at the fair market value of the shares on the date of award, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. Typically, the Compensation Committee awards restricted stock that vests and becomes exercisable solely on the basis of continued employment, or other service, usually over three years, with 33 1/3 % vesting on the first anniversary of the date of the grant and an additional 33 1/3 % vesting on the second and third anniversaries of the date of the grant. Unvested shares are subject to repurchase by the Company at $0.01 per share if employment ends before the third anniversary of the grant date. Recovery of Executive Compensation t r o p e R l a u n n A Our executive compensation program permits us to recover or “clawback” all or a portion of any performance- based compensation if our financial statements are restated as a result of errors, omissions, or fraud. The amount which may be recovered will be the amount by which the affected compensation exceeded the amount that would have been payable had the financial statements been initially filed as restated, or any greater or lesser amount that the Compensation Committee or our Board shall determine. In no case will the amount to be recovered by us be less than the amount required to be repaid or recovered as a matter of law. Recovery of such amounts by us would be in addition to any actions imposed by law, enforcement agencies, regulators, or other authorities. Hedging Prohibition Our executive officers, as well as other employees, are prohibited from engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities where the transaction is designed or intended to decrease the risks associated with holding our securities. This prohibition includes transactions involving puts, call, collars or other derivative securities. Perquisites retention. Our executive officers participate in the same group insurance and employee benefit plans as our other full-time Post-Termination Compensation U.S. employees. We do not provide special benefits or other perquisites to our executive officers. Stock Ownership Guidelines While we do not have a minimum stock ownership requirement for members of the Board and our named executive officers, the corporate governance guidelines adopted by the Board encourage the ownership of our common stock. The Compensation Committee is satisfied that the stock and other equity holdings among our executive officers are sufficient at this time to provide appropriate motivation to align this group’s long-term interests with those of our stockholders. Tax and Accounting Considerations Tax Considerations. The Compensation Committee generally considers the federal income tax and financial accounting consequences of the various components of the executive compensation program in making decisions about executive compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that achieving the compensation objectives discussed above is more important than the benefit of tax deductibility and the executive compensation programs may, from time to time, limit the tax deductibility of compensation. Nevertheless, when not inconsistent with these objectives, the Compensation Committee endeavors to award compensation that will be deductible for income tax purposes. Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) may limit the tax deductions that a public company can claim for compensation to some of its named executive officers. The Company does not guarantee that any compensation intended to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) so qualifies. 98 Accounting Considerations. The Compensation Committee also considers the accounting implications of various forms of executive compensation. In its financial statements, the Company records salaries and performance-based compensation such as bonuses as expenses in the amount paid or to be paid to the named executive officers. Accounting rules also require the Company to record an expense in its financial statements for equity awards, even though equity awards are not paid as cash to employees. The accounting expense of equity awards to employees is calculated in accordance with GAAP. The Compensation Committee believes that the many advantages of equity compensation, as discussed above, more than compensate for the non-cash accounting expense associated with them. Benefits under the 401(k) Plan and Generally Available Benefit Programs In fiscal year 2014, our named executive officers were eligible to participate in the health and welfare programs that are generally available to all full-time U.S.-based employees, including medical, dental, vision, life, short-term and long-term disability, employee assistance, flexible spending and accidental death and dismemberment. In addition, the named executive officers and all other eligible U.S.-based employees can participate in our tax- qualified 401(k) Plan. Under the 401(k) Plan, all eligible employees can receive matching contributions from the Company; however, the Company suspended matching effective January 1, 2014 for an indefinite period of time. Our company-matching contribution for the 401(k) Plan during the first half of fiscal year 2014 was 100% of the first 5% of contributions by the employee to the 401(k) Plan. Employees under the age of 50 can contribute a maximum per participating employee of $17,500 during each calendar year, and employees over the age of 50 can contribute a maximum per participating employee of $23,000. We do not provide defined benefit pension plans or defined contribution retirement plans to the named executive officers or other employees other than the 401(k) Plan, or as required in certain countries other than the United States, for legal or competitive reasons. We adopted an employee stock purchase plan effective November 19, 2009 and commencing on July 3, 2010, under which named executive officers and all other eligible U.S.-based employees can elect, on a quarterly basis, to apply a portion of their cash compensation to purchase shares of our common stock at a 5% discount. An employee’s total purchases in any year cannot exceed $25,000 in value or 15% of his or her salary, whichever is less. Furthermore, an employee may not purchase more than 608 shares of common stock annually under the employee stock purchase plan. The 401(k) Plan, employee stock purchase plan and the other benefit programs allow us to remain competitive and enhance employee loyalty and productivity. These benefit programs are primarily intended to provide all eligible employees with competitive and quality healthcare, financial contributions for retirement and to enhance hiring and Employment agreements have been established with each of our named executive officers. These agreements provide for certain payments and benefits to the employee if his or her employment with us is terminated. These arrangements are discussed in more detail below. We have determined that such payments and benefits are an integral part of a competitive compensation package for our named executive officers. For additional information regarding our employment agreements with our named executive officers, see the discussion under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.” Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our proxy statement. Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors Dr. James C. Stoffel, Chairman Clifford H. Higgerson Dr. Mohsen Sohi using the Black-Scholes valuation method, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. In fiscal year 2014, the Black-Scholes valuations were approximately 50% of the grant-date exercise price value of the shares subject to the option. Service-Based Restricted Stock. Service-based restricted stock awards are awards of stock at the start of a vesting period which is subject to repurchase for nominal consideration if the specified vesting conditions are not satisfied. In addition to their use as a component of the LTIP, awards of service-based restricted stock may be made on a selective basis to individual executives primarily to facilitate retention and succession planning or to replace the value of equity awards that may have been forfeited as a result of the executive’s leaving a former employer. For compensation planning purposes, awards of service-based restricted stock are valued at the fair market value of the shares on the date of award, which is the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date, without reduction to reflect vesting or other conditions. Typically, the Compensation Committee awards restricted stock that vests and becomes exercisable solely on the basis of continued employment, or other service, usually over three years, with 33 1/3 % vesting on the first anniversary of the date of the grant and an additional 33 1/3 % vesting on the second and third anniversaries of the date of the grant. Unvested shares are subject to repurchase by the Company at $0.01 per share if employment ends before the third anniversary of the grant date. Recovery of Executive Compensation Our executive compensation program permits us to recover or “clawback” all or a portion of any performance- based compensation if our financial statements are restated as a result of errors, omissions, or fraud. The amount which may be recovered will be the amount by which the affected compensation exceeded the amount that would have been payable had the financial statements been initially filed as restated, or any greater or lesser amount that the Compensation Committee or our Board shall determine. In no case will the amount to be recovered by us be less than the amount required to be repaid or recovered as a matter of law. Recovery of such amounts by us would be in addition to any actions imposed by law, enforcement agencies, regulators, or other authorities. Our executive officers, as well as other employees, are prohibited from engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities where the transaction is designed or intended to decrease the risks associated with holding our securities. This prohibition includes transactions involving puts, call, collars or other derivative securities. Hedging Prohibition Perquisites Stock Ownership Guidelines While we do not have a minimum stock ownership requirement for members of the Board and our named executive officers, the corporate governance guidelines adopted by the Board encourage the ownership of our common stock. The Compensation Committee is satisfied that the stock and other equity holdings among our executive officers are sufficient at this time to provide appropriate motivation to align this group’s long-term interests with those of our stockholders. Tax and Accounting Considerations Tax Considerations. The Compensation Committee generally considers the federal income tax and financial accounting consequences of the various components of the executive compensation program in making decisions about executive compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that achieving the compensation objectives discussed above is more important than the benefit of tax deductibility and the executive compensation programs may, from time to time, limit the tax deductibility of compensation. Nevertheless, when not inconsistent with these objectives, the Compensation Committee endeavors to award compensation that will be deductible for income tax purposes. Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) may limit the tax deductions that a public company can claim for compensation to some of its named executive officers. The Company does not guarantee that any compensation intended to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) so qualifies. Accounting Considerations. The Compensation Committee also considers the accounting implications of various forms of executive compensation. In its financial statements, the Company records salaries and performance-based compensation such as bonuses as expenses in the amount paid or to be paid to the named executive officers. Accounting rules also require the Company to record an expense in its financial statements for equity awards, even though equity awards are not paid as cash to employees. The accounting expense of equity awards to employees is calculated in accordance with GAAP. The Compensation Committee believes that the many advantages of equity compensation, as discussed above, more than compensate for the non-cash accounting expense associated with them. Benefits under the 401(k) Plan and Generally Available Benefit Programs In fiscal year 2014, our named executive officers were eligible to participate in the health and welfare programs that are generally available to all full-time U.S.-based employees, including medical, dental, vision, life, short-term and long-term disability, employee assistance, flexible spending and accidental death and dismemberment. In addition, the named executive officers and all other eligible U.S.-based employees can participate in our tax- qualified 401(k) Plan. Under the 401(k) Plan, all eligible employees can receive matching contributions from the Company; however, the Company suspended matching effective January 1, 2014 for an indefinite period of time. Our company-matching contribution for the 401(k) Plan during the first half of fiscal year 2014 was 100% of the first 5% of contributions by the employee to the 401(k) Plan. Employees under the age of 50 can contribute a maximum per participating employee of $17,500 during each calendar year, and employees over the age of 50 can contribute a maximum per participating employee of $23,000. We do not provide defined benefit pension plans or defined contribution retirement plans to the named executive officers or other employees other than the 401(k) Plan, or as required in certain countries other than the United States, for legal or competitive reasons. We adopted an employee stock purchase plan effective November 19, 2009 and commencing on July 3, 2010, under which named executive officers and all other eligible U.S.-based employees can elect, on a quarterly basis, to apply a portion of their cash compensation to purchase shares of our common stock at a 5% discount. An employee’s total purchases in any year cannot exceed $25,000 in value or 15% of his or her salary, whichever is less. Furthermore, an employee may not purchase more than 608 shares of common stock annually under the employee stock purchase plan. The 401(k) Plan, employee stock purchase plan and the other benefit programs allow us to remain competitive and enhance employee loyalty and productivity. These benefit programs are primarily intended to provide all eligible employees with competitive and quality healthcare, financial contributions for retirement and to enhance hiring and retention. A n n u a l R e p o r t Our executive officers participate in the same group insurance and employee benefit plans as our other full-time Post-Termination Compensation U.S. employees. We do not provide special benefits or other perquisites to our executive officers. Employment agreements have been established with each of our named executive officers. These agreements provide for certain payments and benefits to the employee if his or her employment with us is terminated. These arrangements are discussed in more detail below. We have determined that such payments and benefits are an integral part of a competitive compensation package for our named executive officers. For additional information regarding our employment agreements with our named executive officers, see the discussion under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.” Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our proxy statement. Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors Dr. James C. Stoffel, Chairman Clifford H. Higgerson Dr. Mohsen Sohi 99 (2) Effective July 18, 2011, Mr. Pangia was appointed President and CEO. Effective October 31, 2011, Mr. Hayes was appointed Senior Vice President and CFO. Effective June 24, 2012, Mr. Stumpe was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Sales Officer. (3) The annual base salary for Mr. Pangia as our CEO is $550,000. The amount in the Summary Compensation table for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2012 of $542,500 reflects Mr. Pangia’s salary as our Chief Sales Officer for the period July 2, 2011 through July 17, 2011 and as our CEO for the period July 18, 2011 through June 29, The annual base salary for Mr. Hayes is $360,000. The amount in the Summary Compensation table for fiscal year 2012 of $235,385 reflects Mr. Hayes’ salary for the period October 31, 2011 through June 29, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. Stumpe is $345,000 effective July 1, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. McFall is $320,000 effective August 15, 2012. (4) Represents a one-time bonus earned by Mr. Hayes in respect of fiscal year 2012 performance for the achievement of certain management objectives. (5) The “Stock Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the performance shares (at target) and restricted stock granted in fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively. The grant date fair value of the performance shares and restricted stock was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards. The grant date fair value for performance awards and restricted stock was based on the closing market price of our common stock on the respective award dates, except for the performance shares granted during fiscal year 2011 as discussed above. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. (6) The “Option Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the stock options granted in fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The grant date fair value of the stock option awards was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. (7) There was no non-equity incentive compensation under the AIP for fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. For fiscal year 2012, this figure represents amounts earned in respect of fiscal year 2012 performance under the fiscal year 2012 AIP as though 100% of revenue and operating income (non-GAAP) targets had been achieved with actual achievement of 100% of both targets. (8) We do not currently have our own pension plan or deferred compensation plan. Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program The Compensation Committee, pursuant to its charter, is responsible for reviewing and overseeing the compensation benefits structure applicable to our employees, generally. We do not believe that our compensation policies and practices for our employees give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the following factors: • Our compensation program is designed to provide a mix of both fixed and “at risk” incentive compensation. 2012. • The incentive elements of our compensation program (annual incentives and multi-year equity LTIP awards) are designed to reward both annual performance (under the annual incentive plan) and longer-term performance (under the LTIP). We believe this design mitigates any incentive for short-term risk-taking that could be detrimental to our company’s long-term best interests. • Maximum payouts under our annual incentive plan are currently capped at 100% of target payouts. We believe these limits mitigate excessive risk-taking, since the maximum amount that can be earned is limited. • Finally, our annual incentive plan and our long-term incentive plan both contain provisions under which awards may be recouped or forfeited if the recipient has not complied with our policies. In addition, our performance-based plans (cash incentive and performance shares) both contain provisions under which awards may be recouped or forfeited if the financial results for a period affecting the calculation of an award are later restated. Summary Compensation Table The following table summarizes the total compensation for each of our fiscal years ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 of our named executive officers, who consisted of our CEO, CFO and the next three other most highly compensated executive officers. t r o p e R l a u n n A Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (8) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (7) All Other Compensation (9) ($) ($) ($) Total ($) Name/Principal Position Michael Pangia, Chief Executive Officer (2) . . . . . . . Edward Hayes Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2). . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe, Senior Vice President and Chief Sales Officer (formerly Chief Operations Officer) (2) . . . . . . Shaun McFall, Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer. . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year (1) 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 Salary (3) ($) 550,000 550,000 542,500 360,000 360,000 Bonus (4) ($) — — — — — Stock Awards (5) ($) Option Awards (6) ($) — 495,542 539,809 160,999 — — 405,533 366,576 275,000 — 243,265 264,997 79,036 — — 235,385 75,000 355,937 458,068 96,250 345,000 340,385 325,000 320,000 315,385 300,000 300,000 300,000 295,385 — — — — — — — — — — 217,588 237,026 92,430 70,693 97,476 — 187,405 204,146 85,320 60,887 89,977 — 162,178 176,665 85,320 52,691 89,977 — — 97,500 — — 90,000 — — 90,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2,142 1,047,684 92,778 1,343,586 234,689 1,824,298 6,284 14,996 609,549 719,029 54,426 1,275,066 2,415 2,379 2,260 5,940 14,170 9,181 4,569 13,414 13,584 565,003 650,483 614,666 513,345 594,588 574,478 466,747 542,770 574,266 (1) Our fiscal year 2014 ended June 27, 2014, fiscal year 2013 ended June 28, 2013 and our fiscal year 2012 ended June 29, 2012. The amounts in this table represent total compensation paid or earned for our fiscal year as included in our annual financial statements. 100 Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program The Compensation Committee, pursuant to its charter, is responsible for reviewing and overseeing the compensation benefits structure applicable to our employees, generally. We do not believe that our compensation policies and practices for our employees give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the following factors: • Our compensation program is designed to provide a mix of both fixed and “at risk” incentive compensation. • The incentive elements of our compensation program (annual incentives and multi-year equity LTIP awards) are designed to reward both annual performance (under the annual incentive plan) and longer-term performance (under the LTIP). We believe this design mitigates any incentive for short-term risk-taking that could be detrimental to our company’s long-term best interests. • Maximum payouts under our annual incentive plan are currently capped at 100% of target payouts. We believe these limits mitigate excessive risk-taking, since the maximum amount that can be earned is limited. • Finally, our annual incentive plan and our long-term incentive plan both contain provisions under which awards may be recouped or forfeited if the recipient has not complied with our policies. In addition, our performance-based plans (cash incentive and performance shares) both contain provisions under which awards may be recouped or forfeited if the financial results for a period affecting the calculation of an award are later restated. Summary Compensation Table The following table summarizes the total compensation for each of our fiscal years ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 of our named executive officers, who consisted of our CEO, CFO and the next three other most highly compensated executive officers. Salary Bonus Stock Awards Option Awards (4) ($) (5) ($) (6) ($) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (7) ($) Name/Principal Position Michael Pangia, Chief Executive Officer (2) . . . . . . . Edward Hayes Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2). . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe, Senior Vice President and Chief Sales Officer (formerly Chief Operations Officer) (2) . . . . . . Shaun McFall, Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer. . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year (1) 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 (3) ($) 550,000 550,000 542,500 360,000 360,000 345,000 340,385 325,000 320,000 315,385 300,000 300,000 300,000 295,385 405,533 366,576 275,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 495,542 539,809 160,999 — 243,265 264,997 79,036 — 217,588 237,026 92,430 204,146 85,320 176,665 85,320 — 187,405 — 162,178 70,693 97,476 60,887 89,977 52,691 89,977 — — — — — — — — — — 97,500 90,000 90,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,284 14,996 2,415 2,379 2,260 5,940 14,170 9,181 4,569 13,414 13,584 (1) Our fiscal year 2014 ended June 27, 2014, fiscal year 2013 ended June 28, 2013 and our fiscal year 2012 ended June 29, 2012. The amounts in this table represent total compensation paid or earned for our fiscal year as included in our annual financial statements. Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred (8) ($) Compensation Earnings All Other Compensation (9) ($) Total ($) 2,142 1,047,684 92,778 1,343,586 234,689 1,824,298 609,549 719,029 235,385 75,000 355,937 458,068 96,250 54,426 1,275,066 565,003 650,483 614,666 513,345 594,588 574,478 466,747 542,770 574,266 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Effective July 18, 2011, Mr. Pangia was appointed President and CEO. Effective October 31, 2011, Mr. Hayes was appointed Senior Vice President and CFO. Effective June 24, 2012, Mr. Stumpe was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Sales Officer. The annual base salary for Mr. Pangia as our CEO is $550,000. The amount in the Summary Compensation table for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2012 of $542,500 reflects Mr. Pangia’s salary as our Chief Sales Officer for the period July 2, 2011 through July 17, 2011 and as our CEO for the period July 18, 2011 through June 29, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. Hayes is $360,000. The amount in the Summary Compensation table for fiscal year 2012 of $235,385 reflects Mr. Hayes’ salary for the period October 31, 2011 through June 29, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. Stumpe is $345,000 effective July 1, 2012. The annual base salary for Mr. McFall is $320,000 effective August 15, 2012. Represents a one-time bonus earned by Mr. Hayes in respect of fiscal year 2012 performance for the achievement of certain management objectives. The “Stock Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the performance shares (at target) and restricted stock granted in fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively. The grant date fair value of the performance shares and restricted stock was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards. The grant date fair value for performance awards and restricted stock was based on the closing market price of our common stock on the respective award dates, except for the performance shares granted during fiscal year 2011 as discussed above. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. A n n u a l R e p o r t The “Option Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the stock options granted in fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The grant date fair value of the stock option awards was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. There was no non-equity incentive compensation under the AIP for fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. For fiscal year 2012, this figure represents amounts earned in respect of fiscal year 2012 performance under the fiscal year 2012 AIP as though 100% of revenue and operating income (non-GAAP) targets had been achieved with actual achievement of 100% of both targets. (8) We do not currently have our own pension plan or deferred compensation plan. 101 (3) (4) Stock options vest in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date, and 33 13% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. (5) The “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the stock options granted in fiscal year 2014. The grant date fair value of the stock options was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards in the event the vesting provisions are achieved. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014 The following table provides information regarding outstanding unexercised stock options and unvested stock awards held by each of our named executive officers as of June 27, 2014. Each grant of options or unvested stock awards is shown separately for each named executive officer. The vesting schedule for each award of options is shown in the footnotes following this table based on the option grant date. The material terms of the option awards, other than exercise price and vesting are generally described in the 2007 Plan. (9) The following table describes the components of the “All Other Compensation” column. There were no Equity Incentive Plan Awards granted under our fiscal year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan. Life Insurance (a) Housing and Auto Allowance Vacation Payout in Cash Severance & Related Benefits ($) ($) ($) ($) Other Patent Income ($) Other Bonus (b) ($) 2,142 2,142 2,100 2,534 2,534 1,657 2,415 2,379 2,260 1,190 1,170 1104 1107 914 709 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 50,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Company Matching Contributions Under 401(k) Plan (d) Total All Other Compensation ($) ($) — — — 3,750 12,462 2,769 — — — 4,750 13,000 8,077 3,462 12,500 12,875 2,142 92,778 234,689 6,284 14,996 54,426 2,415 2,379 2,260 5,940 14,170 9,181 4,569 13,414 13,584 Relocation Benefits (c) ($) — 90,636 232,589 — — — — — — — — — — — — Name Michael Pangia. . . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes. . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . Year 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 _____________________ t r o p e R l a u n n A (a) (b) (c) Represents premiums paid for life insurance that represent taxable income for the named executive officer. Represents a sign-on bonus paid to Mr. Hayes. Represents taxable benefits paid in connection with the relocation of Mr. Pangia’s household to California from Georgia. (d) Represents matching contributions made by us to the 401(k) account of the respective named executive. Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 The following table lists our grants and incentives during our fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 of plan-based awards, both equity and non-equity based and including our Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan, to the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table. There is no assurance that the grant date fair value of stock and option awards will ever be realized. All Other Stock Awards in Fiscal 2014 Estimated Possible Payouts Under Short-Term Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards in Fiscal 2014 (2) Estimated Future Payments Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards in Fiscal 2014 (3) Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Target Maximum Number of Shares of Stock or Units Number of Securities Underlying Options (4) Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($) ($) ($) (#) (#) (#) (#) (#) ($/Share) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 416,667 204,545 182,955 157,576 136,364 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (5) ($) 495,542 243,265 217,588 187,405 162,178 Name Michael Pangia. . . Edward Hayes Jr. . Heinz H. Stumpe . Shaun McFall . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . Grant Date (1) 9/9/2013 9/9/2013 9/9/2013 9/9/2013 9/9/2013 _____________________ (1) (2) Grant Date of Common Stock under the 2007 Plan. There were no Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards granted under our fiscal year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan. 102 (9) The following table describes the components of the “All Other Compensation” column. Life Insurance (a) ($) Housing and Auto Allowance Vacation Payout in Cash Severance & Related Benefits ($) ($) ($) Other Patent Income ($) Other Bonus Relocation Benefits (b) ($) (c) ($) Company Matching Contributions Under 401(k) Plan (d) Total All Other Compensation ($) ($) 2,142 2,142 2,100 2,534 2,534 1,657 2,415 2,379 2,260 1,190 1,170 1104 1107 914 709 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 50,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 90,636 232,589 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,750 12,462 2,769 — — — — — — 4,750 13,000 8,077 3,462 12,500 12,875 2,142 92,778 234,689 6,284 14,996 54,426 2,415 2,379 2,260 5,940 14,170 9,181 4,569 13,414 13,584 Represents premiums paid for life insurance that represent taxable income for the named executive officer. Represents a sign-on bonus paid to Mr. Hayes. Represents taxable benefits paid in connection with the relocation of Mr. Pangia’s household to California from (d) Represents matching contributions made by us to the 401(k) account of the respective named executive. Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2014 The following table lists our grants and incentives during our fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 of plan-based awards, both equity and non-equity based and including our Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan, to the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table. There is no assurance that the grant date fair value of stock and option awards will ever be realized. Estimated Possible Payouts Under Short-Term Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards in Fiscal 2014 (2) Estimated Future Payments Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards in Fiscal 2014 (3) Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Target Maximum All Other Stock Awards in Fiscal 2014 Number of Shares of Stock or Units Number of Securities Underlying Options (4) Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($) ($) ($) (#) (#) (#) (#) (#) ($/Share) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 416,667 204,545 182,955 157,576 136,364 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (5) ($) 495,542 243,265 217,588 187,405 162,178 Grant Date of Common Stock under the 2007 Plan. There were no Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards granted under our fiscal year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan. Name Michael Pangia. . . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes. . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . Year 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 _____________________ (a) (b) (c) Georgia. Name Michael Pangia. . . Edward Hayes Jr. . Heinz H. Stumpe . Shaun McFall . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . Grant Date (1) 9/9/2013 9/9/2013 9/9/2013 9/9/2013 9/9/2013 _____________________ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) There were no Equity Incentive Plan Awards granted under our fiscal year 2014 Annual Incentive Plan. Stock options vest in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date, and 33 13% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. The “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column shows the full grant date fair value of the stock options granted in fiscal year 2014. The grant date fair value of the stock options was determined under FASB ASC Topic 718 and represents the amount we would expense in our financial statements over the entire vesting schedule for the awards in the event the vesting provisions are achieved. The assumptions used for determining values are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. These amounts reflect our accounting for these grants and do not correspond to the actual values that may be recognized by the named executive officers. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014 The following table provides information regarding outstanding unexercised stock options and unvested stock awards held by each of our named executive officers as of June 27, 2014. Each grant of options or unvested stock awards is shown separately for each named executive officer. The vesting schedule for each award of options is shown in the footnotes following this table based on the option grant date. The material terms of the option awards, other than exercise price and vesting are generally described in the 2007 Plan. A n n u a l R e p o r t 103 Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (4) Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (3) Stock Awards Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares Units or Other Rights that have not Vested Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have not Vested (3) (#) ($) (#) ($) t r o p e R l a u n n A Name Michael Pangia. . . . Edward Hayes Jr. . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . Shaun McFall . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . Option Awards [Awards Listed in Chronological Order] Award Grant Date Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) (#) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($) 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 03/30/2009 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 — — 68,750 225,965 — 50,000 49,052 80,586 — — 33,750 222,175 101,959 — — — — 30,187 60,086 — 55,000 30,100 37,326 — — 26,000 55,464 — 55,000 26,198 29,796 — — 22,500 55,464 — 40,000 22,297 16,428 416,667 (1) — 68,750 (2) 75,322 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 204,545 (1) — 33,750 (2) 74,059 (2) 33,987 (2) — — 182,955 (1) — 30,188 (2) 20,029 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 157,576 (1) — 26,000 (2) 18,488 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 136,364 (1) — 22,500 (2) 18,488 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.60 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 4.05 2.6 — 2.28 2.05 2.05 — — 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 Option Expiration Date 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 — — — — — — — — — 32,592 40,740 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 3/30/2016 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 10/31/2018 10/31/2018 — — 9/9/20 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — __ — 30,487 11,738 38,109 14,673 — — — — — — — — — 4,333 5,416 11/11/2017 — — 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4,000 5,000 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4,000 5,000 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 — — — — — — __________________________ (1) (2) (3) (4) Stock options vest in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. Stock options vest in installments of 50% one year from the grant date, 25% two years from the grant date and 25% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. Restricted stock that vests in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. Market value is based on the $2.21 closing price of a share of our common stock on June 27, 2014, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. 104 — 22,298 (5) — 27,873 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10,946 (5) 13,683 Name — — — — — — — — — — — — 9,791 (5) 12,239 Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 8,433 (5) 10,541 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7,298 (5) 9,123 — — — — — — — — — — — — (5) Performance shares were granted under the fiscal year 2013 LTIP, and vest if performance target is met: 1/3 upon performance target is met, 1/3 at the end of fiscal year 2014 and 1/3 at the end of fiscal 2015. The performance target is $0.17 of Non-GAAP EPS for fiscal 2013. The shares may vest following the end of our fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, based on continuous employment and achievement of performance results as stated above. The first one-third of the performance shares vested on August 28, 2013. Option Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2014 The following table provides information for each of our named executive officers regarding the number of shares of our common stock acquired upon the vesting of stock awards during fiscal year 2014. No options to purchase common stock were exercised during fiscal year 2014. Stock awards vesting during fiscal year 2014 consisted of restricted stock with service-based and performance-based vesting provisions. P r o x y S t a t e m e n t Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) Number of Shares Value Received on Value Realized on Exercise ($) Acquired on Vesting (#) Vesting ($) (3) Michael Pangia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward Hayes Jr.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shaun McFall. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _________________________ — — — — — — — — — — 40,926 (1) 205,365 (2) 42,226 (1) 100,816 (2) 13,499 (1) 90,174 (2) 13,166 (1) 77,665 (2) 10,666 (1) 67,210 (2) 101,006 498,355 86,986 244,647 29,786 218,823 28,927 188,467 23,852 163,096 Vested number of shares of service-based restricted common stock. Vested number of shares of performance-based restricted common stock. (1) (2) (3) Amount shown is the aggregate market value of the vested shares of restricted common stock based on the closing price of our stock on the vesting date. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control Employment agreements have been established with each of the continuing named executive officers, which provide for such executives to receive certain payments and benefits if their employment with us is terminated. These arrangements are set forth in detail below assuming a termination event on June 27, 2014 based on our stock price on that date. The Board has determined that such payments and benefits are an integral part of a competitive compensation package for our executive officers. The table below reflects the compensation and benefits due to each of the named executive officers in the event of termination of employment by us without cause or termination by the executive for good reason (other than within 18 months after a Change of Control, as defined below) and in the event of disability and in the event of termination of employment by us without cause or termination by the executive for good reason within 18 months after a Change of Control. The amounts shown in the table are estimates of the amounts that would be paid upon termination of employment. There are no compensation and benefits due to any named executive officer in the event of death, or of termination of employment by us for cause or voluntary termination. The actual amounts would be determined only at the time of the termination of employment. Name Michael Pangia. . . . Edward Hayes Jr. . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . Shaun McFall . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 03/30/2009 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 10/31/2011 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 09/09/2013 11/29/2012 10/03/2012 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 11/11/2010 11/12/2009 11/05/2008 — — 68,750 225,965 — 50,000 49,052 80,586 33,750 222,175 101,959 — — — — — — 30,187 60,086 — 55,000 30,100 37,326 — — 26,000 55,464 — 55,000 26,198 29,796 — — 22,500 55,464 — 40,000 22,297 16,428 416,667 (1) 68,750 (2) 75,322 (2) — (2) — (2) — (2) 204,545 (1) 33,750 (2) 74,059 (2) 33,987 (2) 182,955 (1) 30,188 (2) 20,029 (2) — — (2) — (2) — (2) 157,576 (1) 26,000 (2) 18,488 (2) — (2) — (2) — (2) 136,364 (1) 22,500 (2) 18,488 (2) — — — — — — — — — — — (2) — (2) — (2) Option Expiration Date 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 3/30/2016 9/9/2020 10/3/2019 10/31/2018 10/31/2018 — — — — 9/9/20 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 9/9/2020 — 10/3/2019 9/8/2018 11/11/2017 11/12/2016 11/5/2015 2.60 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 4.05 2.6 — 2.28 2.05 2.05 — — 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 2.6 — 2.28 2.37 — 4.36 6.00 5.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — __ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 30,487 11,738 38,109 14,673 — 4,333 5,416 11/11/2017 — — — 4,000 5,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7,298 (5) 9,123 — 4,000 5,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — __________________________ (1) Stock options vest in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. (2) Stock options vest in installments of 50% one year from the grant date, 25% two years from the grant date and 25% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. (3) Restricted stock that vests in installments of 33 1/3% one year from the grant date, 33 1/3% two years from the grant date and 33 1/3% three years from the grant date based on continuous employment through those dates. (4) Market value is based on the $2.21 closing price of a share of our common stock on June 27, 2014, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Option Awards Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($) [Awards Listed in Chronological Order] Award Grant Date Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) (#) Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (4) ($) Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have Vested (3) not (#) Stock Awards Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares Units or Other Rights that have not Vested (#) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have not Vested (3) ($) 22,298 (5) 27,873 — 32,592 40,740 (5) Performance shares were granted under the fiscal year 2013 LTIP, and vest if performance target is met: 1/3 upon performance target is met, 1/3 at the end of fiscal year 2014 and 1/3 at the end of fiscal 2015. The performance target is $0.17 of Non-GAAP EPS for fiscal 2013. The shares may vest following the end of our fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, based on continuous employment and achievement of performance results as stated above. The first one-third of the performance shares vested on August 28, 2013. Option Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2014 The following table provides information for each of our named executive officers regarding the number of shares of our common stock acquired upon the vesting of stock awards during fiscal year 2014. No options to purchase common stock were exercised during fiscal year 2014. Stock awards vesting during fiscal year 2014 consisted of restricted stock with service-based and performance-based vesting provisions. 10,946 (5) 13,683 Name Michael Pangia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward Hayes Jr.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,791 (5) 12,239 Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shaun McFall. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,433 (5) 10,541 _________________________ Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) Value Realized on Exercise ($) Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) Value Received on Vesting ($) (3) — — — — — — — — — — 40,926 (1) 205,365 (2) 42,226 (1) 100,816 (2) 13,499 (1) 90,174 (2) 13,166 (1) 77,665 (2) 10,666 (1) 67,210 (2) 101,006 498,355 86,986 244,647 29,786 218,823 28,927 188,467 23,852 163,096 (1) (2) (3) Vested number of shares of service-based restricted common stock. Vested number of shares of performance-based restricted common stock. Amount shown is the aggregate market value of the vested shares of restricted common stock based on the closing price of our stock on the vesting date. Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control Employment agreements have been established with each of the continuing named executive officers, which provide for such executives to receive certain payments and benefits if their employment with us is terminated. These arrangements are set forth in detail below assuming a termination event on June 27, 2014 based on our stock price on that date. The Board has determined that such payments and benefits are an integral part of a competitive compensation package for our executive officers. The table below reflects the compensation and benefits due to each of the named executive officers in the event of termination of employment by us without cause or termination by the executive for good reason (other than within 18 months after a Change of Control, as defined below) and in the event of disability and in the event of termination of employment by us without cause or termination by the executive for good reason within 18 months after a Change of Control. The amounts shown in the table are estimates of the amounts that would be paid upon termination of employment. There are no compensation and benefits due to any named executive officer in the event of death, or of termination of employment by us for cause or voluntary termination. The actual amounts would be determined only at the time of the termination of employment. 105 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t A n n u a l R e p o r t Name Michael Pangia ....... Edward J. Hayes, Jr. ............................ Heinz H. Stumpe .... Shaun McFall ......... Meena Elliott .......... Conditions for Payouts Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control t r o p e R l a u n n A Number of Months (#) Base per Month (1) ($) Months Times Base ($) Total Severance Payments ($) Accelerated Equity Vesting (3) ($) Continuation of Insurance Benefit (4) ($) Out- Placement Services (5) ($) Total ($) 12 45,833 550,000 550,000 — 20,362 30,000 600,362 24 12 24 12 24 12 24 12 45,833 1,100,000 1,100,000 873,505 40,724 30,000 2,044,229 30,000 360,000 360,000 — 18,072 30,000 408,072 30,000 720,000 720,000 660,199 36,145 30,000 1,446,344 acquisition), or 28,750 345,000 345,000 — 25,124 30,000 400,124 28,750 690,000 690,000 339,170 50,247 30,000 1,109,417 26,667 320,000 320,000 — 18,072 30,000 368,072 26,667 640,000 640,000 297,476 36,145 30,000 1,003,621 27,067 324,804 324,804 — 16,520 30,000 371,324 24 27,067 649,608 649,608 284,639 33,040 30,000 997,287 ______________________ (1) (2) (3) (4) The monthly base salary represents the total gross monthly payments to each named executive officer at the current salary. Reflects acceleration of outstanding equity awards as of June 27, 2014. The insurance benefit provided is paid directly to the insurer benefit provider and includes amounts for COBRA. The estimated dollar amounts for Outplacement Services would be paid directly to an outplacement provider selected by us. The employment agreements with our named executive officers define a “Change of Control” as follows: • any merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition, unless immediately following such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition of at least 50% of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the entity resulting from such merger, consolidation or share exchange, or the entity which has acquired all or substantially all of our assets (in the case of an asset sale that satisfies the criteria of an acquisition) (in either case, the “Surviving Entity”), or • if applicable, the ultimate parent entity that directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 50% or more of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Surviving Entity is represented by our securities that were outstanding immediately prior to such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition (or, if applicable, is represented by shares into which such Company securities were converted pursuant to such merger, consolidation, share exchange or • any person or group of persons (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership (determined pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of securities possessing more than 30% of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities pursuant to a tender or exchange offer made directly to the our stockholders that the Board does not recommend such stockholders accept, other than: (i) an employee benefit plan of ours or any of our Affiliates; (ii) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of our or any of our Affiliates; or (iii) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities; or • over a period of 36 consecutive months or less, there is a change in the composition of the Board such that a majority of the Board members (rounded up to the next whole number, if a fraction) ceases, by reason of one or more proxy contests for the election of Board members, to be composed of individuals each of whom meet one of the following criteria: (i) have been a Board member continuously since the adoption of this Plan or the beginning of such 36-month period; (ii) have been appointed by Harris; or (iii) have been elected or nominated during such 36-month period by at least a majority of the Board members that belong to the same Class of director as such Board member; and (iv) satisfied one of the above criteria when they were elected or nominated; or a majority of the Board determines that a Change of Control has occurred; or the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company. • • • • Employment agreements are in effect for the other current named executive officers, which provide that if they are terminated without cause or should they resign for good reason or become disabled and they sign a general release they will be entitled to receive the following severance benefits: severance payments at their final base salary for a period of 12 months following termination; payment of premiums necessary to continue their group health insurance under COBRA (or to purchase other comparable health coverage on an individual basis if the employee is no longer eligible for COBRA coverage) until the earlier of (i) 12 months; or (ii) the date on which they first became eligible to participate in another employer’s group health insurance plan; • the prorated portion of any incentive bonus they would have earned during the incentive bonus period in which their employment was terminated; • any equity compensation subject to service-based vesting granted to the executive officer will stop vesting as of their termination date; however, they will be entitled to purchase any vested share(s) of stock that are subject to the outstanding options until the earlier of: (i) 12 months; or (ii) the date on which the applicable option(s) expire; and • outplacement assistance selected and paid for by us. 106 Name Michael Pangia ....... Conditions for Months Number of (#) 12 Base per Month (1) ($) Months Times Base ($) Total Severance Payments ($) Accelerated Equity Vesting (3) ($) Continuation of Insurance Benefit (4) ($) Out- Placement Services (5) ($) Total ($) 45,833 550,000 550,000 — 20,362 30,000 600,362 45,833 1,100,000 1,100,000 873,505 40,724 30,000 2,044,229 Edward J. Hayes, Jr. ............................ 30,000 360,000 360,000 — 18,072 30,000 408,072 30,000 720,000 720,000 660,199 36,145 30,000 1,446,344 Heinz H. Stumpe .... 28,750 345,000 345,000 — 25,124 30,000 400,124 28,750 690,000 690,000 339,170 50,247 30,000 1,109,417 Shaun McFall ......... 26,667 320,000 320,000 — 18,072 30,000 368,072 26,667 640,000 640,000 297,476 36,145 30,000 1,003,621 Meena Elliott .......... 27,067 324,804 324,804 — 16,520 30,000 371,324 Payouts Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control Termination without cause or for good reason, or due to disability Within 18 months after Change of Control 24 12 24 12 24 12 24 12 24 27,067 649,608 649,608 284,639 33,040 30,000 997,287 ______________________ (2) (3) current salary. COBRA. selected by us. (1) The monthly base salary represents the total gross monthly payments to each named executive officer at the Reflects acceleration of outstanding equity awards as of June 27, 2014. The insurance benefit provided is paid directly to the insurer benefit provider and includes amounts for (4) The estimated dollar amounts for Outplacement Services would be paid directly to an outplacement provider The employment agreements with our named executive officers define a “Change of Control” as follows: • • • • • • any merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition, unless immediately following such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition of at least 50% of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the entity resulting from such merger, consolidation or share exchange, or the entity which has acquired all or substantially all of our assets (in the case of an asset sale that satisfies the criteria of an acquisition) (in either case, the “Surviving Entity”), or if applicable, the ultimate parent entity that directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 50% or more of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Surviving Entity is represented by our securities that were outstanding immediately prior to such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition (or, if applicable, is represented by shares into which such Company securities were converted pursuant to such merger, consolidation, share exchange or acquisition), or any person or group of persons (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership (determined pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of securities possessing more than 30% of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities pursuant to a tender or exchange offer made directly to the our stockholders that the Board does not recommend such stockholders accept, other than: (i) an employee benefit plan of ours or any of our Affiliates; (ii) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of our or any of our Affiliates; or (iii) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities; or over a period of 36 consecutive months or less, there is a change in the composition of the Board such that a majority of the Board members (rounded up to the next whole number, if a fraction) ceases, by reason of one or more proxy contests for the election of Board members, to be composed of individuals each of whom meet one of the following criteria: (i) have been a Board member continuously since the adoption of this Plan or the beginning of such 36-month period; (ii) have been appointed by Harris; or (iii) have been elected or nominated during such 36-month period by at least a majority of the Board members that belong to the same Class of director as such Board member; and (iv) satisfied one of the above criteria when they were elected or nominated; or a majority of the Board determines that a Change of Control has occurred; or the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company. A n n u a l R e p o r t Employment agreements are in effect for the other current named executive officers, which provide that if they are terminated without cause or should they resign for good reason or become disabled and they sign a general release they will be entitled to receive the following severance benefits: • • • • severance payments at their final base salary for a period of 12 months following termination; payment of premiums necessary to continue their group health insurance under COBRA (or to purchase other comparable health coverage on an individual basis if the employee is no longer eligible for COBRA coverage) until the earlier of (i) 12 months; or (ii) the date on which they first became eligible to participate in another employer’s group health insurance plan; the prorated portion of any incentive bonus they would have earned during the incentive bonus period in which their employment was terminated; any equity compensation subject to service-based vesting granted to the executive officer will stop vesting as of their termination date; however, they will be entitled to purchase any vested share(s) of stock that are subject to the outstanding options until the earlier of: (i) 12 months; or (ii) the date on which the applicable option(s) expire; and • outplacement assistance selected and paid for by us. 107 In addition, these agreements provide that if there is a Change of Control, and employment with us is terminated Fiscal 2014 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors t r o p e R l a u n n A by us without cause or by the employee for good reason within 18 months after the Change of Control and they sign a general release of known and unknown claims in a form satisfactory to us, (i) the severance benefits described shall be increased by an additional 12 months; (ii) they will receive a payment equal to the greater of (a) the average of the annual incentive bonus payments received by them, if any, for the previous three years; or (b) their target incentive bonus for the year in which their employment terminates; and (iii) the vesting of all unvested stock option(s) and unvested equity-compensation awards subject to service-based vesting will accelerate, such that all of such stock option(s) and equity-compensation awards will be fully vested as of the date of their termination/resignation. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS The form and amount of director compensation is reviewed and assessed from time to time by the Compensation Committee with changes, if any, recommended to the Board for action. Director compensation may take the form of cash, equity, and other benefits ordinarily available to directors. Directors who are not employees of ours received the following fees, as applicable, for their services on our Board during fiscal year 2014: • • • • $60,000 basic annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, which a director may elect to receive in the form of shares of common stock; $18,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as the lead independent director of our Board;$10,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Audit Committee; $5,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee; $8,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Compensation Committee; • Annual grant of restricted shares of common stock valued (based on market prices on the date of grant) at $30,000, with 100% vesting in one year, subject to continuing service as a director; and • Annual grant of options to purchase common stock valued (based on U.S. GAAP (as defined below) values of the options on the date of grant) at $30,000, with an exercise price per share equal to the market price on the date of grant and with 100% vesting in one year, subject to continuing service as a director. During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Kissner received $130,000 for services provided concerning strategic transactions and investor relations, and was not paid a cash retainer in connection with this service as a director or as Chairman. Directors are eligible to defer payment of all or a portion of the retainer fees and restricted stock awards that are payable to them. Directors may choose either a lump sum or installment distribution of such fees and awards. Installment distributions are payable in annual installments over a period no longer than 10 years. We reimburse each non-employee director for reasonable travel expenses incurred and in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings on our behalf, and for expenses such as supplies and continuing director education costs, including travel for one course per year. Employee directors are not compensated for service as a director. 108 Our non-employee directors received the following aggregate amounts of compensation in respect of the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (1) ($) 65,000 60,000 130,000 60,000 60,000 86,000 70,000 Name William A. Hasler. . . . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson . . . Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . Raghavendra Rau . . . . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . Edward F. Thompson. . . . ___________________ Changes in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Stock Option Awards (2) Awards (2) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Compensation Earnings All Other Compensation ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — P r o x y S t a t e m e n t Total ($) 123,492 118,492 188,492 118,492 118,492 144,492 128,492 — — — — — — — (1) During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Kissner received $130,000 for services provided concerning strategic transactions and investor relations, and was not paid a cash retainer in connection with this service as a director or as Chairman. (2) The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards and option awards granted to our non-employee directors computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in determining the fair values of our stock awards and option awards are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our fiscal 2014 Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 12, 2014. As of June 27, 2014, our non-employee directors held the following numbers of unvested restricted shares of common stock and stock options, all of which were granted under the 2007 Plan: Name William A. Hasler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raghavendra Rau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward F. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unvested Stock Unvested Option Awards Awards 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 Indemnification Our Bylaws require us to indemnify each of our directors and officers with respect to their activities as a director, officer, or employee of ours, or when serving at our request as a director, officer, or trustee of another corporation, trust, or other enterprise, against losses and expenses (including attorney fees, judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement) incurred by them in any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, to which they are, or are threatened to be made, a party(ies) as a result of their service to us. In addition, we carry directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which includes similar coverage for our directors and executive officers. We will indemnify each such director or officer for any one or a combination of the following, whichever is most advantageous to such director or officer: In addition, these agreements provide that if there is a Change of Control, and employment with us is terminated Fiscal 2014 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors by us without cause or by the employee for good reason within 18 months after the Change of Control and they sign a general release of known and unknown claims in a form satisfactory to us, (i) the severance benefits described shall be increased by an additional 12 months; (ii) they will receive a payment equal to the greater of (a) the average of the annual incentive bonus payments received by them, if any, for the previous three years; or (b) their target incentive bonus for the year in which their employment terminates; and (iii) the vesting of all unvested stock option(s) and unvested equity-compensation awards subject to service-based vesting will accelerate, such that all of such stock option(s) and equity-compensation awards will be fully vested as of the date of their termination/resignation. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS The form and amount of director compensation is reviewed and assessed from time to time by the Compensation Committee with changes, if any, recommended to the Board for action. Director compensation may take the form of cash, equity, and other benefits ordinarily available to directors. Directors who are not employees of ours received the following fees, as applicable, for their services on our Board during fiscal year 2014: • $60,000 basic annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, which a director may elect to receive in the form of shares of common stock; • $18,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as the lead independent director of our Board;$10,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Audit • $5,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Governance and • $8,000 annual cash retainer, payable on a quarterly basis, for service as Chairman of the Compensation Committee; Committee; Nominating Committee; • Annual grant of restricted shares of common stock valued (based on market prices on the date of grant) at $30,000, with 100% vesting in one year, subject to continuing service as a director; and • Annual grant of options to purchase common stock valued (based on U.S. GAAP (as defined below) values of the options on the date of grant) at $30,000, with an exercise price per share equal to the market price on the date of grant and with 100% vesting in one year, subject to continuing service as a director. During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Kissner received $130,000 for services provided concerning strategic transactions and investor relations, and was not paid a cash retainer in connection with this service as a director or as Chairman. Directors are eligible to defer payment of all or a portion of the retainer fees and restricted stock awards that are payable to them. Directors may choose either a lump sum or installment distribution of such fees and awards. Installment distributions are payable in annual installments over a period no longer than 10 years. We reimburse each non-employee director for reasonable travel expenses incurred and in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings on our behalf, and for expenses such as supplies and continuing director education costs, including travel for one course per year. Employee directors are not compensated for service as a director. P r o x y S t a t e m e n t A n n u a l R e p o r t Our non-employee directors received the following aggregate amounts of compensation in respect of the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014. Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (1) Stock Awards (2) Option Awards (2) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Changes in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings All Other Compensation ($) 65,000 60,000 130,000 60,000 60,000 86,000 70,000 ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,253 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 29,239 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total ($) 123,492 118,492 188,492 118,492 118,492 144,492 128,492 Name William A. Hasler. . . . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson . . . Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . Raghavendra Rau . . . . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . Edward F. Thompson. . . . ___________________ (1) (2) During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Kissner received $130,000 for services provided concerning strategic transactions and investor relations, and was not paid a cash retainer in connection with this service as a director or as Chairman. The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards and option awards granted to our non-employee directors computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in determining the fair values of our stock awards and option awards are set forth in Notes 1 and 10 to our fiscal 2014 Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 12, 2014. As of June 27, 2014, our non-employee directors held the following numbers of unvested restricted shares of common stock and stock options, all of which were granted under the 2007 Plan: Name William A. Hasler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charles D. Kissner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raghavendra Rau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward F. Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unvested Stock Awards Unvested Option Awards 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 14,925 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 36,403 Indemnification Our Bylaws require us to indemnify each of our directors and officers with respect to their activities as a director, officer, or employee of ours, or when serving at our request as a director, officer, or trustee of another corporation, trust, or other enterprise, against losses and expenses (including attorney fees, judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement) incurred by them in any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, to which they are, or are threatened to be made, a party(ies) as a result of their service to us. In addition, we carry directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which includes similar coverage for our directors and executive officers. We will indemnify each such director or officer for any one or a combination of the following, whichever is most advantageous to such director or officer: 109 • The benefits provided by our Bylaws in effect on the date of the indemnification agreement or at the time expenses are incurred by the director or officer; • The benefits allowable under Delaware law in effect on the date the indemnification bylaw was adopted, or as such law may be amended; • The benefits available under liability insurance obtained by us; and • Such benefits as may otherwise be available to the director or officer under our existing practices. Under our Bylaws, each director or officer will continue to be indemnified even after ceasing to occupy a position as an officer, director, employee or agent of ours with respect to suits or proceedings arising from his or her service with us. Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Steel Partners Holdings L.P.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,020,865 (3) 12.89% Shares Beneficially Owned as of November 18, 2014(1) Number of Shares of Common Stock(2) Percentage of Voting Power of Common Stock PENN Capital Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,665,602 (4) 5.89% Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Schneider Capital Management Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,654,866 (5) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Dimensional Fund Advisors LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,558,261 (6) The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of November 18, 2014 by each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than 5 percent of our common stock, by our directors, by our named executive officers and by all our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons listed in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the beneficial owners identified is c/o Aviat Networks, Inc., 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054. As of November 18, 2014, there were 62,223,790 shares of our common stock outstanding. t r o p e R l a u n n A 590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor New York, NY Navy Yard Corporate Center Three Crescent Drive, Suite 400 Philadelphia, PA 19112 460 E. Swedesford Road, Suite 2000 Wayne, PA 19087 Palisades West, Building One 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One Austin, TX 78746 5.87% 5.72% 1.26% 1.27% 1.79% * * * * * * * * * Michael Pangia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,113,516 (13) Named Executive Officers and Directors Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . William A. Hasler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charles D. Kissner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raghavendra Rau. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward F. Thompson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . __________________________ * Less than one percent 331,514 (7) 184,199 (8) 307,806 (9) 784,246 (10) 790,658 (11) 408,035 (12) 146,506 (14) 175,660 (8) 175,511 (8) 425,787 (15) 178,011 (8) All directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons) . . . . . . . 5,021,449 (16) 8.07% (1) Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules and regulations of the SEC, and generally includes voting or dispositive power with respect to such shares. (2) Shares of common stock that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by that person for the purpose of computing the total number of shares beneficially owned by that person and the percentage ownership of that person, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person or group. Accordingly, the amounts in the table include shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of November 18, 2014 by the exercise of stock options. (3) Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 5 to the Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on November 10, 2014 by Steel Excel Inc., Steel Partners Holdings L.P., SPH Group LLC, SPH Group Holdings LLC and Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc. Each of the foregoing entities reported shared voting and dispositive power with (4) Based solely on a review of the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013 by PENN Capital Management. PENN Capital Management reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all such respect to all of such shares. shares. 110 • The benefits provided by our Bylaws in effect on the date of the indemnification agreement or at the time • The benefits allowable under Delaware law in effect on the date the indemnification bylaw was adopted, or expenses are incurred by the director or officer; as such law may be amended; • The benefits available under liability insurance obtained by us; and • Such benefits as may otherwise be available to the director or officer under our existing practices. Under our Bylaws, each director or officer will continue to be indemnified even after ceasing to occupy a position as an officer, director, employee or agent of ours with respect to suits or proceedings arising from his or her service with us. Shares Beneficially Owned as of November 18, 2014(1) Number of Shares of Common Stock(2) Percentage of Voting Power of Common Stock Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Steel Partners Holdings L.P.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,020,865 (3) 12.89% 590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor New York, NY PENN Capital Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,665,602 (4) 5.89% Navy Yard Corporate Center Three Crescent Drive, Suite 400 Philadelphia, PA 19112 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Schneider Capital Management Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,654,866 (5) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of November 18, 2014 by each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than 5 percent of our common stock, by our directors, by our named executive officers and by all our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons listed in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the beneficial owners identified is c/o Aviat Networks, Inc., 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054. As of November 18, 2014, there were 62,223,790 shares of our common stock outstanding. 460 E. Swedesford Road, Suite 2000 Wayne, PA 19087 Dimensional Fund Advisors LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,558,261 (6) Palisades West, Building One 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One Austin, TX 78746 Named Executive Officers and Directors Meena Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . William A. Hasler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clifford H. Higgerson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward J. Hayes, Jr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charles D. Kissner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shaun McFall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331,514 (7) 184,199 (8) 307,806 (9) 784,246 (10) 790,658 (11) 408,035 (12) Michael Pangia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,113,516 (13) Raghavendra Rau. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Mohsen Sohi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. James C. Stoffel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heinz H. Stumpe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edward F. Thompson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146,506 (14) 175,660 (8) 175,511 (8) 425,787 (15) 178,011 (8) A n n u a l R e p o r t 5.87% 5.72% * * * 1.26% 1.27% * 1.79% * * * * * All directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons) . . . . . . . 5,021,449 (16) 8.07% __________________________ * Less than one percent (1) (2) (3) (4) Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules and regulations of the SEC, and generally includes voting or dispositive power with respect to such shares. Shares of common stock that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by that person for the purpose of computing the total number of shares beneficially owned by that person and the percentage ownership of that person, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person or group. Accordingly, the amounts in the table include shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of November 18, 2014 by the exercise of stock options. Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 5 to the Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on November 10, 2014 by Steel Excel Inc., Steel Partners Holdings L.P., SPH Group LLC, SPH Group Holdings LLC and Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc. Each of the foregoing entities reported shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. Based solely on a review of the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 15, 2013 by PENN Capital Management. PENN Capital Management reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all such shares. 111 (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) t r o p e R l a u n n A Based solely on a review of the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 by Schneider Capital Management Corporation. Schneider Capital Management Corporation reported sole voting power with respect to 3,630,240 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2014 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reported sole voting power with respect to 3,449,131 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all such shares. Includes options to purchase 231,882 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes options to purchase 103,820 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes options to purchase 103,820 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 107,895 shares held by, or in trusts for, members of Mr. Higgerson’s family. Also includes 24,400 shares held by Higgerson Investments. Mr. Higgerson disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in trust and held by Higgerson Investments. Includes options to purchase 550,987 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes options to purchase 345,636 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 239,041 shares held by, or in trusts for, members of Mr. Kissner’s family. Mr. Kissner disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in trust. Includes options to purchase 276,472 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes options to purchase 722,939 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes options to purchase 100,983 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes options to purchase 308,807 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Our Code of Conduct prohibits all employees, including our executive officers, from benefiting personally from any transactions with us other than approved compensation benefits. Includes options to purchase 3,056,806 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Equity Compensation Plan Summary The following table provides information as of June 27, 2014, relating to our equity compensation plan pursuant to which grants of options, restricted stock and performance shares may be granted from time to time and the option plans and agreements assumed by us in connection with the Stratex acquisition: Plan Category Equity Compensation plan approved by security holders(3). . Equity Compensation plans not approved by security holders(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _________________________ Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Options and Vesting of restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units(1) Weighted- Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options(2) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Further Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column) 7,708,529 32,625 7,741,154 $ $ $ 3.21 24.60 3.30 3,599,382 — 3,599,382 (1) Under the 2007 Stock Equity Plan, in addition to options, we have granted share-based compensation awards in the form of performance shares, restricted stock, performance share units and restricted stock units. As of June 27, 2014, there were 389,612 such awards outstanding under that plan. The outstanding awards consisted of (i) performance share awards at target and restricted stock awards, for which all 197,457 shares were issued and outstanding; and (ii) 192,155 performance share unit awards at target and restricted stock unit awards, for which all 192,155 were payable in shares but for which no shares were yet issued and outstanding. The 112 7,708,529 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units as listed in the first column consisted of shares to be issued in respect of the exercise of 7,516,374 outstanding options and in respect of the 192,155 performance share unit awards and restricted stock units awards payable in shares. (2) (3) (4) Excluded weighted average fair value of restricted stock units and performance share units at issuance date. Consisted solely of our 2007 Stock Equity Plan, as amended and restated effective November 17, 2011. Consisted of common stock that may be issued pursuant to option plans and agreements assumed pursuant to the Stratex acquisition. The Stratex plans were duly approved by the stockholders of Stratex prior to the merger with us. No shares are available for further issuance. (5) For further information on our equity compensation plans see “Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity” in the notes to consolidated financial P r o x y S t a t e m e n t statements included in Item 8. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence During fiscal year 2014, we believe there were no transactions, or series of similar transactions, to which we were or are to be a party in which the amount exceeded $120,000, and in which any of our directors or executive officers, any holders of more than 5% of our common stock or any members of any such person’s immediate family, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation described in the sections titled “Director Compensation and Benefits” and “Executive Compensation.” It is the policy and practice of our Board to review and assess information concerning transactions involving related persons. Related persons include our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members. If the determination is made that a related person has a material interest in a transaction involving us, then the disinterested members of our Board would review and approve or ratify it, and we would disclose the transaction in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. If the related person is a member of our Board, or a family member of a director, then that director would not participate in any discussion involving the transaction at issue. Information regarding director independence appears in Part III, Item 10 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services KPMG LLP has been approved by our Audit Committee to act as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 27, 2014. Audit and other fees billed to us for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 are as follows: Audit Fees(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,989,380 $ 1,428,917 Audit-Related Fees(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax Fees(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All Other Fees(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 104,356 10,000 7,500 64,185 — Total Fees for Services Provided . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,103,736 $ 1,500,602 Fiscal 2014(2) Fiscal 2013(1) ________________________ (1) On September 6, 2012, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of KPMG LLP as its new independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending June 28, 2013. The appointment of KPMG LLP was ratified by our stockholders at our 2012 Annual Meeting held on November 13, 2012. (2) Includes the following fees billed to us by KPMG LLP for the period June 27, 2014 through December 19, 2014: audit fees totaling $1,488,698 and tax fees totaling $16,601. (5) Based solely on a review of the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 by Schneider Capital Management Corporation. Schneider Capital Management Corporation reported sole voting power with respect to 3,630,240 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. (6) Based solely on a review of Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2014 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reported sole voting power with respect to 3,449,131 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all such shares. (7) Includes options to purchase 231,882 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. (8) Includes options to purchase 103,820 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. (9) Includes options to purchase 103,820 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 107,895 shares held by, or in trusts for, members of Mr. Higgerson’s family. Also includes 24,400 shares held by Higgerson Investments. Mr. Higgerson disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in trust and held by Higgerson Investments. (10) Includes options to purchase 550,987 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. (11) Includes options to purchase 345,636 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Includes 239,041 shares held by, or in trusts for, members of Mr. Kissner’s family. Mr. Kissner disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in trust. (12) Includes options to purchase 276,472 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. (13) Includes options to purchase 722,939 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. (14) Includes options to purchase 100,983 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. (16) Includes options to purchase 3,056,806 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. Equity Compensation Plan Summary The following table provides information as of June 27, 2014, relating to our equity compensation plan pursuant to which grants of options, restricted stock and performance shares may be granted from time to time and the option plans and agreements assumed by us in connection with the Stratex acquisition: Plan Category Equity Compensation plan approved by security holders(3). . Equity Compensation plans not approved by security holders(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _________________________ Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Options and Vesting of restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units(1) Weighted- Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options(2) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Further Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column) 7,708,529 32,625 7,741,154 $ $ $ 3.21 24.60 3.30 3,599,382 — 3,599,382 (1) Under the 2007 Stock Equity Plan, in addition to options, we have granted share-based compensation awards in the form of performance shares, restricted stock, performance share units and restricted stock units. As of June 27, 2014, there were 389,612 such awards outstanding under that plan. The outstanding awards consisted of (i) performance share awards at target and restricted stock awards, for which all 197,457 shares were issued and outstanding; and (ii) 192,155 performance share unit awards at target and restricted stock unit awards, for which all 192,155 were payable in shares but for which no shares were yet issued and outstanding. The 7,708,529 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units as listed in the first column consisted of shares to be issued in respect of the exercise of 7,516,374 outstanding options and in respect of the 192,155 performance share unit awards and restricted stock units awards payable in shares. Excluded weighted average fair value of restricted stock units and performance share units at issuance date. Consisted solely of our 2007 Stock Equity Plan, as amended and restated effective November 17, 2011. Consisted of common stock that may be issued pursuant to option plans and agreements assumed pursuant to the Stratex acquisition. The Stratex plans were duly approved by the stockholders of Stratex prior to the merger with us. No shares are available for further issuance. For further information on our equity compensation plans see “Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity” in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. (2) (3) (4) (5) Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence During fiscal year 2014, we believe there were no transactions, or series of similar transactions, to which we were or are to be a party in which the amount exceeded $120,000, and in which any of our directors or executive officers, any holders of more than 5% of our common stock or any members of any such person’s immediate family, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation described in the sections titled “Director Compensation and Benefits” and “Executive Compensation.” It is the policy and practice of our Board to review and assess information concerning transactions involving related persons. Related persons include our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members. If the determination is made that a related person has a material interest in a transaction involving us, then the disinterested members of our Board would review and approve or ratify it, and we would disclose the transaction in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. If the related person is a member of our Board, or a family member of a director, then that director would not participate in any discussion involving the transaction at issue. P r o x y S t a t e m e n t A n n u a l R e p o r t (15) Includes options to purchase 308,807 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become Our Code of Conduct prohibits all employees, including our executive officers, from benefiting personally from exercisable within 60 days of November 18, 2014. any transactions with us other than approved compensation benefits. Information regarding director independence appears in Part III, Item 10 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services KPMG LLP has been approved by our Audit Committee to act as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 27, 2014. Audit and other fees billed to us for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 are as follows: Audit Fees(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Audit-Related Fees(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax Fees(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All Other Fees(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Fees for Services Provided . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________ Fiscal 2014(2) Fiscal 2013(1) $ 2,989,380 $ 1,428,917 — 104,356 10,000 7,500 64,185 — $ 3,103,736 $ 1,500,602 (1) (2) On September 6, 2012, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of KPMG LLP as its new independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending June 28, 2013. The appointment of KPMG LLP was ratified by our stockholders at our 2012 Annual Meeting held on November 13, 2012. Includes the following fees billed to us by KPMG LLP for the period June 27, 2014 through December 19, 2014: audit fees totaling $1,488,698 and tax fees totaling $16,601. 113 (3) (4) (5) (6) Audit fees include fees associated with the annual audit, as well as reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10- Q, SEC registration statements, accounting and reporting consultations and statutory audits required internationally for our subsidiaries. Audit-related fees include fees for completion of certain statutory registration requirements. Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance and tax planning services. Other fees include fees billed for other services rendered not included within Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees or Tax Fees. PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (a) The following documents are filed as part of this report. 1. Financial Statements. The financial statements of Aviat Networks, Inc. are set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. KPMG LLP did not perform any professional services related to financial information systems design and 2. Financial Statement Schedules. implementation for us in fiscal 2014 or fiscal 2013. The Audit Committee has determined in its business judgment that the provision of non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP's independence. Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the three fiscal years ended June 27, 2014 All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. t r o p e R l a u n n A (b) Exhibits. the SEC: Ex. # 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference to exhibits previously filed with Description Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Aviat U.S., Inc. and EION Networks, Inc., dated as of September 2, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 9, 2011, File No. 001-33278) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on November 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Amended and Restated Bylaws of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Certificate of Ownership and Merger Merging Aviat Networks, Inc. into Harris Stratex Networks, Inc., effective January 27, 2010, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on January 27, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2010, File No. 001-33278) 114 (3) Audit fees include fees associated with the annual audit, as well as reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10- Q, SEC registration statements, accounting and reporting consultations and statutory audits required internationally for our subsidiaries. Audit-related fees include fees for completion of certain statutory registration requirements. Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance and tax planning services. Other fees include fees billed for other services rendered not included within Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees or (4) (5) (6) Tax Fees. implementation for us in fiscal 2014 or fiscal 2013. The Audit Committee has determined in its business judgment that the provision of non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP's independence. KPMG LLP did not perform any professional services related to financial information systems design and 2. Financial Statement Schedules. The financial statements of Aviat Networks, Inc. are set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (a) The following documents are filed as part of this report. 1. Financial Statements. Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the three fiscal years ended June 27, 2014 All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. (b) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC: Ex. # 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 Description Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Aviat U.S., Inc. and EION Networks, Inc., dated as of September 2, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 9, 2011, File No. 001-33278) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on November 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Amended and Restated Bylaws of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Certificate of Ownership and Merger Merging Aviat Networks, Inc. into Harris Stratex Networks, Inc., effective January 27, 2010, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on January 27, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2010, File No. 001-33278) A n n u a l R e p o r t 115 Ex. # 4.1 4.1.1 4.2 4.3 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 Intentionally omitted 10.13.1* Intentionally omitted Description Ex. # Description Specimen common stock certificate, adopted as of January 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year end July 2, 2010 filed with the SEC on September 9, 2010, File No. 001-33278) Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intellectual Property Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Harris Corporation dated January 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted 10.6.1 Intentionally omitted 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Tax Sharing Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Harris Corporation dated January 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.11 Intentionally omitted 10.12* Intentionally omitted 10.13* Intentionally omitted No. 001-33278) 10.19 Intentionally omitted 10.19.1 Intentionally omitted 10.20 Intentionally omitted 10.20.1 Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted 10.20.2 10.20.3 No. 001-33278) 10.21 Intentionally omitted Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, by and among Aviat Networks, Inc., Aviat U.S., Inc., Aviat Networks (S) Pte. Ltd., and Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014, File 10.14* Standard Form of Executive Employment Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and certain executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.15 Form of Indemnification Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and its directors and certain officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Stratex Networks, Inc., File No. 33-13431) 10.16 Intentionally omitted 10.17* Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2008 filed with the SEC on September 25, 2008, File No. 001-33278) 10.18* 10.18.1 Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on February 5, 2007, File No. 333-140442) Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective November 19, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant’s Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2009, File No. 001-33278) 10.18.2 Aviat Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective November 17, 2011) (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on October 3, 2011, File t r o p e R l a u n n A 116 Specimen common stock certificate, adopted as of January 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year end July 2, 2010 filed with the SEC on September 9, 2010, File No. 001-33278) Intellectual Property Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Harris Corporation dated January 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) Ex. # 4.1 4.1.1 4.2 4.3 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted 10.6.1 Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted 10.11 Intentionally omitted 10.12* Intentionally omitted 10.13* Intentionally omitted Description Ex. # Description 10.13.1* Intentionally omitted 10.14* 10.15 Standard Form of Executive Employment Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and certain executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) Form of Indemnification Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and its directors and certain officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Stratex Networks, Inc., File No. 33-13431) 10.16 Intentionally omitted 10.17* 10.18* 10.18.1 10.18.2 Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2008 filed with the SEC on September 25, 2008, File No. 001-33278) Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on February 5, 2007, File No. 333-140442) Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective November 19, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant’s Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Aviat Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective November 17, 2011) (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on October 3, 2011, File No. 001-33278) Tax Sharing Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Harris Corporation dated January 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.19 Intentionally omitted 10.19.1 Intentionally omitted 10.20 Intentionally omitted 10.20.1 Intentionally omitted 10.20.2 10.20.3 Intentionally omitted Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, by and among Aviat Networks, Inc., Aviat U.S., Inc., Aviat Networks (S) Pte. Ltd., and Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014, File No. 001-33278) 10.21 Intentionally omitted A n n u a l R e p o r t 117 Ex. # Description 10.22* Intentionally omitted 10.22.1* 10.23* Employment Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2011, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and Edward J. Hayes, Jr. (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 31, 2011, File No. 001-33278) Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2006, between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Heinz Stumpe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2007 filed with the SEC on May 8, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.24* Intentionally omitted 10.24.1* Intentionally omitted 10.24.2* Intentionally omitted t r o p e R l a u n n A 10.25* 10.25.1* Employment Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2002, between Stratex Networks, Inc. and Shaun McFall (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2009 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Amendment, effective April 1, 2006, to Employment Agreement, dated May 14, 2002, between Stratex Networks, Inc. and Shaun McFall (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2009 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009, File No. 001-33278) 10.26* Intentionally omitted 10.26.1* Intentionally omitted 10.27* Intentionally omitted 10.28* 10.29* Employment Agreement, dated July 18, 2011, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and Michael Pangia (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 20, 2011, File No. 001-33278) Employment Agreement, dated December 30, 2010, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and John Madigan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2011, File No. 001-33278) Intentionally omitted Description Letter from Ernst & Young LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission dated September 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2012, File No.. 001-33278) Ex. # 10.31 16 21 23.1 23.2 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 List of Subsidiaries of Aviat Networks, Inc. Consent of KPMG LLP Consent of Ernst & Young LLP Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer 101.INS XBRL Instance Document 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document _____________________________ of this report. * Management compensatory contract, arrangement or plan required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) 118 Ex. # Description 10.22* Intentionally omitted 10.22.1* Employment Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2011, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and Edward J. Hayes, Jr. (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 31, 2011, File No. 001-33278) 10.23* Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2006, between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Heinz Stumpe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2007 filed with the SEC on May 8, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.25* Employment Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2002, between Stratex Networks, Inc. and Shaun McFall (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2009 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009, File No. 001-33278) 10.25.1* Amendment, effective April 1, 2006, to Employment Agreement, dated May 14, 2002, between Stratex Networks, Inc. and Shaun McFall (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2009 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009, File No. 10.24* Intentionally omitted 10.24.1* Intentionally omitted 10.24.2* Intentionally omitted 001-33278) 10.26* Intentionally omitted 10.26.1* Intentionally omitted 10.27* Intentionally omitted No. 001-33278) Ex. # 10.31 16 21 23.1 23.2 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 Intentionally omitted Description Letter from Ernst & Young LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission dated September 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2012, File No.. 001-33278) List of Subsidiaries of Aviat Networks, Inc. Consent of KPMG LLP Consent of Ernst & Young LLP Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer 101.INS XBRL Instance Document 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document A n n u a l R e p o r t 10.28* Employment Agreement, dated July 18, 2011, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and Michael Pangia (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 20, 2011, File _____________________________ 10.29* Employment Agreement, dated December 30, 2010, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and John Madigan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2011, File No. 001-33278) * Management compensatory contract, arrangement or plan required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report. 119 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. (Registrant) By: /s/ Michael A. Pangia Balance at Beginning of Period Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses Deductions Describe (In millions) Balance at End of Period Date: December 19, 2014 Michael A. Pangia President and Chief Executive Officer Allowances for collection losses: Year ended June 27, 2014. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Year ended June 28, 2013. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Year ended June 29, 2012. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10.2 16.2 14.2 $ $ $ 1.5 2.8 3.9 $ $ $ 4.3 (A) 8.8 (B) 1.9 (C) $ $ $ 7.4 10.2 16.2 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. ____________________________ Note A Consisted of changes to allowance for collection losses of $4.3 million for uncollectible accounts charged off, net of recoveries on accounts previously charged off. Note B Consisted of changes to allowance for collection losses of $0.1 million for foreign currency translation losses and $8.9 million for uncollectible accounts charged off, net of recoveries on accounts previously charged off. Note C Consisted of changes to allowance for collection losses of $0.7 million for foreign currency translation gains and $1.2 million for uncollectible accounts charged off, net of recoveries on accounts previously charged off. Signature Title Date t r o p e R l a u n n A /s/ Michael A. Pangia Michael A. Pangia /s/ Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Edward J. Hayes, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) December 19, 2014 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) December 19, 2014 /s/ John J. Madigan John J. Madigan Vice President, Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) December 19, 2014 /s/ Charles D. Kissner Charles D. Kissner /s/ William A. Hasler William A. Hasler /s/ Clifford H. Higgerson Clifford H. Higgerson /s/ Raghavendra Rau Raghavendra Rau /s/ Dr. Mohsen Sohi Dr. Mohsen Sohi /s/ James C. Stoffel James C. Stoffel /s/ Edward F. Thompson Edward F. Thompson Chairman of the Board December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 Lead Independent Director December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 120 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. Years Ended June 27, 2014, June 28, 2013 and June 29, 2012 Balance at Beginning of Period Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses Deductions Describe Balance at End of Period (In millions) Allowances for collection losses: Year ended June 27, 2014. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Year ended June 28, 2013. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Year ended June 29, 2012. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ____________________________ 10.2 16.2 14.2 $ $ $ 1.5 2.8 3.9 $ $ $ 4.3 (A) 8.8 (B) 1.9 (C) $ $ $ 7.4 10.2 16.2 Note A Consisted of changes to allowance for collection losses of $4.3 million for uncollectible accounts charged off, net of recoveries on accounts previously charged off. Note B Consisted of changes to allowance for collection losses of $0.1 million for foreign currency translation losses and $8.9 million for uncollectible accounts charged off, net of recoveries on accounts previously charged off. Note C Consisted of changes to allowance for collection losses of $0.7 million for foreign currency translation gains and $1.2 million for uncollectible accounts charged off, net of recoveries on accounts previously charged off. A n n u a l R e p o r t AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. (Registrant) By: /s/ Michael A. Pangia Michael A. Pangia President and Chief Executive Officer Date: December 19, 2014 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date /s/ Michael A. Pangia Michael A. Pangia /s/ Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Edward J. Hayes, Jr. /s/ John J. Madigan John J. Madigan /s/ Charles D. Kissner Charles D. Kissner /s/ William A. Hasler William A. Hasler /s/ Clifford H. Higgerson Clifford H. Higgerson /s/ Raghavendra Rau Raghavendra Rau /s/ Dr. Mohsen Sohi Dr. Mohsen Sohi /s/ James C. Stoffel James C. Stoffel /s/ Edward F. Thompson Edward F. Thompson President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) December 19, 2014 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) December 19, 2014 Vice President, Corporate Controller and December 19, 2014 Principal Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) Chairman of the Board December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 Lead Independent Director December 19, 2014 Director December 19, 2014 121 The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference to exhibits previously filed with EXHIBIT INDEX Description the SEC: Ex. # 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.1 4.1.1 4.2 4.3 10.1 10.2 10.3 t r o p e R l a u n n A Description Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Aviat U.S., Inc. and EION Networks, Inc., dated as of September 2, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 9, 2011, File No. 001-33278) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on November 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Amended and Restated Bylaws of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Certificate of Ownership and Merger Merging Aviat Networks, Inc. into Harris Stratex Networks, Inc., effective January 27, 2010, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on January 27, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2010, File No. 001-33278) Intentionally omitted Specimen common stock certificate, adopted as of January 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year end July 2, 2010 filed with the SEC on September 9, 2010, File No. 001-33278) Networks, Inc., File No. 33-13431) 10.16 Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intellectual Property Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Harris Corporation dated January 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.6.1 Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Ex. # 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11 Intentionally omitted 10.12* Intentionally omitted 10.13* Intentionally omitted 10.13.1* Intentionally omitted Tax Sharing Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Harris Corporation dated January 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.14* Standard Form of Executive Employment Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and certain executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.15 Form of Indemnification Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and its directors and certain officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Stratex 122 The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference to exhibits previously filed with EXHIBIT INDEX Description Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Aviat U.S., Inc. and EION Networks, Inc., dated as of September 2, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 9, 2011, File No. 001-33278) 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on November 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Amended and Restated Bylaws of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 23, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Certificate of Ownership and Merger Merging Aviat Networks, Inc. into Harris Stratex Networks, Inc., effective January 27, 2010, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on January 27, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2010, File No. 001-33278) Intentionally omitted Specimen common stock certificate, adopted as of January 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year end July 2, 2010 filed with the SEC on September 9, 2010, File No. 001-33278) Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intellectual Property Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Harris Corporation dated January 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) the SEC: Ex. # 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.2 3.3 4.1 4.1.1 4.2 4.3 10.1 10.2 10.3 Ex. # 10.4 10.5 10.6 Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted 10.6.1 Intentionally omitted Description 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Intentionally omitted Tax Sharing Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Harris Corporation dated January 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.11 Intentionally omitted 10.12* Intentionally omitted 10.13* Intentionally omitted 10.13.1* Intentionally omitted 10.14* 10.15 Standard Form of Executive Employment Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and certain executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2007, File No. 001-33278) Form of Indemnification Agreement between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and its directors and certain officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Stratex Networks, Inc., File No. 33-13431) 10.16 Intentionally omitted A n n u a l R e p o r t 123 Ex. # 10.17* 10.18* 10.18.1 10.18.2 Description Ex. # Description Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2008 filed with the SEC on September 25, 2008, File No. 001-33278) Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on February 5, 2007, File No. 333-140442) Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective November 19, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant’s Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Aviat Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective November 17, 2011) (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on October 3, 2011, File No. 001-33278) t r o p e R l a u n n A 10.19 Intentionally omitted 10.19.1 Intentionally omitted 10.20 Intentionally omitted 10.20.1 Intentionally omitted 10.20.2 Intentionally omitted 10.20.3 Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, by and among Aviat Networks, Inc., Aviat U.S., Inc., Aviat Networks (S) Pte. Ltd., and Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014, File No. 001-33278) 10.21 Intentionally omitted 10.22* Intentionally omitted 10.22.1* Employment Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2011, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and Edward J. Hayes, Jr. (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 31, 2011, File No. 001-33278) 10.23* Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2006, between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Heinz Stumpe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2007 filed with the SEC on May 8, 2007, File No. 001-33278) 10.24* Intentionally omitted 10.24.1* Intentionally omitted 10.24.2* Intentionally omitted 10.25* Employment Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2002, between Stratex Networks, Inc. and Shaun McFall (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2009 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009, File No. 001-33278) 10.25.1* Amendment, effective April 1, 2006, to Employment Agreement, dated May 14, 2002, between Stratex Networks, Inc. and Shaun McFall (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2009 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009, File No. 001-33278) 10.26* Intentionally omitted 10.26.1* Intentionally omitted 10.27* Intentionally omitted 10.28* Employment Agreement, dated July 18, 2011, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and Michael Pangia (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 20, 2011, File No. 001-33278) 10.29* Employment Agreement, dated December 30, 2010, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and John Madigan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2011, File No. 001-33278) 10.31 Intentionally omitted Letter from Ernst & Young LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission dated September 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2012, File No.. 001-33278) 16 21 23.1 23.2 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 List of Subsidiaries of Aviat Networks, Inc. Consent of KPMG LLP Consent of Ernst & Young LLP Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer 101.INS XBRL Instance Document 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document ______________________________ of this report. * Management compensatory contract, arrangement or plan required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) 124 Ex. # 10.17* 10.18* 10.18.1 Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2008 filed with the SEC on September 25, 2008, File No. 001-33278) Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on February 5, 2007, File No. 333-140442) Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective November 19, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant’s Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2009, File No. 001-33278) 10.18.2 Aviat Networks, Inc. 2007 Stock Equity Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective November 17, 2011) (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on October 3, 2011, File No. 001-33278) 10.19 Intentionally omitted 10.19.1 Intentionally omitted 10.20 Intentionally omitted 10.20.1 Intentionally omitted 10.20.2 Intentionally omitted No. 001-33278) 10.21 Intentionally omitted 10.22* Intentionally omitted 10.24* Intentionally omitted 10.24.1* Intentionally omitted 10.20.3 Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2014, by and among Aviat Networks, Inc., Aviat U.S., Inc., Aviat Networks (S) Pte. Ltd., and Silicon Valley Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014, File 10.22.1* Employment Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2011, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and Edward J. Hayes, Jr. (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 31, 2011, File No. 001-33278) 10.23* Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2006, between Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. and Heinz Stumpe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2007 filed with the SEC on May 8, 2007, File No. 001-33278) Description Ex. # Description 10.24.2* Intentionally omitted 10.25* 10.25.1* Employment Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2002, between Stratex Networks, Inc. and Shaun McFall (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2009 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009, File No. 001-33278) Amendment, effective April 1, 2006, to Employment Agreement, dated May 14, 2002, between Stratex Networks, Inc. and Shaun McFall (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2009 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2009, File No. 001-33278) 10.26* Intentionally omitted 10.26.1* Intentionally omitted 10.27* Intentionally omitted 10.28* 10.29* Employment Agreement, dated July 18, 2011, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and Michael Pangia (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 20, 2011, File No. 001-33278) Employment Agreement, dated December 30, 2010, between Aviat Networks, Inc. and John Madigan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2011, File No. 001-33278) 10.31 Intentionally omitted 16 21 23.1 23.2 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 Letter from Ernst & Young LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission dated September 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2012, File No.. 001-33278) List of Subsidiaries of Aviat Networks, Inc. Consent of KPMG LLP Consent of Ernst & Young LLP Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer A n n u a l R e p o r t 101.INS XBRL Instance Document 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document ______________________________ * Management compensatory contract, arrangement or plan required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report. 125 Exhibit 31.1 Exhibit 31.2 I, Michael A. Pangia, certify that: I, Edward J. Hayes, Jr., certify that: CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, of Aviat Networks, Inc.; 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, of Aviat Networks, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: t r o p e R l a u n n A a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: December 19, 2014 /s/ Michael A. Pangia Name: Title: Michael A. Pangia President and Chief Executive Officer Date: December 19, 2014 /s/ Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Name: Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer Exhibit 31.1 Exhibit 31.2 I, Michael A. Pangia, certify that: I, Edward J. Hayes, Jr., certify that: CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, of Aviat Networks, Inc.; 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, of Aviat Networks, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; A n n u a l R e p o r t c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: December 19, 2014 Date: December 19, 2014 /s/ Michael A. Pangia Name: Michael A. Pangia Title: President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Name: Title: Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer Exhibit 32.1 Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aviat Networks, Inc. (“Aviat Networks”) for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael A. Pangia, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, that: 1. 2. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aviat Networks as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aviat Networks, Inc. (“Aviat Networks”) for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Edward J. Hayes, Jr., hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, that: 1. 2. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aviat Networks as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report Date: December 19, 2014 /s/ Michael A. Pangia Name: Title: Michael A. Pangia President and Chief Executive Officer Date: December 19, 2014 /s/ Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Name: Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer t r o p e R l a u n n A Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Certification Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aviat Networks, Inc. (“Aviat Networks”) for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael A. Pangia, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aviat Networks as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report that: 1. 2. Date: December 19, 2014 Exhibit 32.1 Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aviat Networks, Inc. (“Aviat Networks”) for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Edward J. Hayes, Jr., hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, that: 1. 2. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aviat Networks as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report /s/ Michael A. Pangia Name: Michael A. Pangia Title: President and Chief Executive Officer Date: December 19, 2014 /s/ Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Name: Title: Edward J. Hayes, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer A n n u a l R e p o r t Appendix A-1 This page intentionally left blank. Appendix A-1 To Ourareholders Online Voting at www.proxyonline.com If you are a registered stockholder, you may now use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions any time before 5:00 p.m. EST on February 23, 2015. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the Web site. You will be prompted to enter your Control Number to obtain your records and create an electronic voting instruction form. www.Aviatnetworks.com The Aviat Networks Web site provides access to a wide variety of information, including products, new releases and financial information. A principal feature of the Web site is the Investor Relations section, which contains general financial information and access to the current Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders. The site also provides archived information (for example, historical financial releases and stock prices) and access to conference calls and analyst group presentations. Other interesting features are the press release alerts and SEC filings email alerts, which allow users to receive automatic updates informing them when new items such as news releases, financial event announcements and SEC documents are added to the site. www.computershare.com/investor The Computershare Web site provides access to an Internet self-service product, Investor Centre. Through Investor Centre, registered stockholders can view their account profiles, stock certificate histories, Form 1099 tax information, current stock price quote (20-minute delay) and historical stock prices. Stockholders may also request the issuance of stock certificates, duplicate Form 1099s, safekeeping of stock certificates or an address change. Stockholder Information Executive Offices Aviat Networks, Inc. 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95054 (408) 567-7000 Independent Public Accountants KPMG LLP Transfer Agent and Registrar Computershare PO Box 30170 College Station, TX 77842 Investor Relations Contact Investor Relations 408-567-7117 InvestorInfo@aviatnet.com Overnight Correspondence to: Computershare 211 Quality Circle Suite 210 College Station, TX 77845 Tel: (800) 522-6645 TDD for hearing Impaired: 800-231-5469 Foreign Shareowners: 201-680-6578 TDD Foreign Shareowners: 201-680-6610 Shareholder website: www.computershare.com/investor Shareholder online inquiries: https://www-us.computershare.com/investor/contact Stockholder Inquiries Questions relating to stockholder records, change of ownership or change of address should be sent to our transfer agent, Computershare, whose address appears above. Financial Information Securities analysts, investment managers and stockholders should direct financial information inquiries to the Investor Relations contact listed above. SEC Form 10-K A copy of the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is available by downloading from our website, Aviatnetworks.com or by writing to: Aviat Networks, Inc. Attn: Investor Relations 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, California 95054 2014 Annual Report We have published this 2014 Annual Report to Stockholders, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis, as an appendix to our Proxy Statement. Further information regarding various aspects of our business can be found on our Web site (www.Aviatnetworks.com). Electronic Delivery In an effort to reduce paper mailed to your home, we offer stockholders the convenience of viewing the Proxy Statement, Annual Report to Stockholders and related materials online. With your consent, we can stop sending future paper copies of these documents to you by mail. To participate, follow the instructions at www.icsdelivery.com. A-2 A-3 To Ourareholders Online Voting at www.proxyonline.com If you are a registered stockholder, you may now use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions any time before 5:00 p.m. EST on February 23, 2015. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the Web site. You will be prompted to enter your Control Number to obtain your records and create an electronic voting instruction form. www.Aviatnetworks.com The Aviat Networks Web site provides access to a wide variety of information, including products, new releases and financial information. A principal feature of the Web site is the Investor Relations section, which contains general financial information and access to the current Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders. The site also provides archived information (for example, historical financial releases and stock prices) and access to conference calls and analyst group presentations. Other interesting features are the press release alerts and SEC filings email alerts, which allow users to receive automatic updates informing them when new items such as news releases, financial event announcements and SEC documents are added to the site. www.computershare.com/investor The Computershare Web site provides access to an Internet self-service product, Investor Centre. Through Investor Centre, registered stockholders can view their account profiles, stock certificate histories, Form 1099 tax information, current stock price quote (20-minute delay) and historical stock prices. Stockholders may also request the issuance of stock certificates, duplicate Form 1099s, safekeeping of stock certificates or an address change. Stockholder Information Executive Offices Aviat Networks, Inc. 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95054 (408) 567-7000 Independent Public Accountants KPMG LLP Transfer Agent and Registrar Investor Relations Contact Computershare PO Box 30170 Investor Relations 408-567-7117 College Station, TX 77842 InvestorInfo@aviatnet.com Overnight Correspondence to: Computershare 211 Quality Circle Suite 210 College Station, TX 77845 Tel: (800) 522-6645 TDD for hearing Impaired: 800-231-5469 Foreign Shareowners: 201-680-6578 TDD Foreign Shareowners: 201-680-6610 Shareholder website: www.computershare.com/investor Shareholder online inquiries: https://www-us.computershare.com/investor/contact Stockholder Inquiries Questions relating to stockholder records, change of ownership or change of address should be sent to our transfer agent, Computershare, whose address appears above. Securities analysts, investment managers and stockholders should direct financial information inquiries to A copy of the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is available by downloading from our website, Aviatnetworks.com or by writing to: Financial Information the Investor Relations contact listed above. SEC Form 10-K Aviat Networks, Inc. Attn: Investor Relations 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, California 95054 2014 Annual Report We have published this 2014 Annual Report to Stockholders, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis, as an appendix to our Proxy Statement. Further information regarding various aspects of our business can be found on our Web site (www.Aviatnetworks.com). Electronic Delivery In an effort to reduce paper mailed to your home, we offer stockholders the convenience of viewing the Proxy Statement, Annual Report to Stockholders and related materials online. With your consent, we can stop sending future paper copies of these documents to you by mail. To participate, follow the instructions at www.icsdelivery.com. A-2 A-3 Corporate Directory Officers Michael Pangia President and Chief Executive Officer Michael Shahbazian Interim Chief Financial Officer Shaun McFall Sr. Vice President, Chief Marketing and Strategy Officer Heinz H. Stumpe Sr. Vice President and Chief Sales Officer Meena Elliott Sr. Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary John Madigan Vice President, Corporate Controller, Principal Accounting Officer Directors Charles D. Kissner Chairman of the Board Aviat Networks, Inc. Director ShoreTel, Inc. Meru Networks, Inc. Rambus, Inc. William A. Hasler Director Ditech Networks, Inc. Globalstar, Inc. Mission West Properties, Inc. James R. Henderson Director & Chairman of the Board School Specialty, Inc. Director RELM Wireless Corporation GenCorp, Inc. John Mutch Managing Partner MV Advisors LLC Director Steel Excel, Inc. Agilysys, Inc. Robert G. Pearse Managing Partner Yucatan Rock Ventures Director Crossroads Systems, Inc. John J. Quicke Managing Partner Steel Partners, LLC Director Steel Excel, Inc. Dr. James C. Stoffel Lead Independent Director Aviat Networks, Inc. Director Harris Corporation Outside Legal Counsel Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC Palo Alto, CA Headquarters and Operations Corporate Headquarters Aviat Networks, Inc. 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95054 United States International Headquarters, Singapore Aviat Networks (S) Pte. Ltd. 17, Changi Business Park Central 1 Honeywell Building, #04-01 Singapore 486073 Asia & Pacific Rim Bangkok, Thailand Colombo, Sri Lanka Gurgaon, India Jakarta, Indonesia Manila, Philippines Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Shenzhen, China Singapore Sydney, Australia Wellington, New Zealand Offices North America Montréal, Canada Durham, NC San Antonio, TX Mexico Mexico D.F. Europe Aix En Provence, France Châtenay-Malabry, France Glasgow, Scotland Hilversum, The Netherlands London, United Kingdom Madrid, Spain Moscow, Russia Nuneaton, United Kingdom Trin-Ljubljana, Slovenia Warsaw, Poland Africa Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire Accra, Ghana Alger, Algeria Lagos, Nigeria Midrand, South Africa Nairobi, Kenya Middle East Dubai, United Arab Emirates Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Forward-looking Statements This Annual Report, including the letter to shareholders, contains forward-looking statements that are based on the views of management regarding future events at the time of publication of this report. These forward-looking statements, which include, but are not limited to: our plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; new products, services or developments; future economic conditions; outlook; impact on operating results due to the volume, timing, customer, product and geographic mix of our product orders; our growth potential and the potential of industries and the markets we serve, are subject to the known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by each forward- looking statement. These risks, uncertainties and other factors are discussed in the 2014 Form 10-K. A-4 A-5 Corporate Directory Officers Michael Pangia President and Chief Executive Officer Michael Shahbazian Interim Chief Financial Officer Sr. Vice President, Chief Marketing and Shaun McFall Strategy Officer Heinz H. Stumpe Meena Elliott Secretary John Madigan Sr. Vice President and Chief Sales Officer Sr. Vice President, General Counsel and Vice President, Corporate Controller, Principal Accounting Officer Directors Charles D. Kissner Chairman of the Board Aviat Networks, Inc. Director ShoreTel, Inc. Meru Networks, Inc. Rambus, Inc. William A. Hasler Director Ditech Networks, Inc. Globalstar, Inc. Mission West Properties, Inc. James R. Henderson Director & Chairman of the Board School Specialty, Inc. Director RELM Wireless Corporation GenCorp, Inc. John Mutch Managing Partner MV Advisors LLC Director Steel Excel, Inc. Agilysys, Inc. Robert G. Pearse Managing Partner Yucatan Rock Ventures Director Crossroads Systems, Inc. John J. Quicke Managing Partner Steel Partners, LLC Director Steel Excel, Inc. Dr. James C. Stoffel Lead Independent Director Aviat Networks, Inc. Director Harris Corporation Outside Legal Counsel Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC Palo Alto, CA Headquarters and Operations Corporate Headquarters Aviat Networks, Inc. 5200 Great America Parkway Santa Clara, CA 95054 United States International Headquarters, Singapore Aviat Networks (S) Pte. Ltd. 17, Changi Business Park Central 1 Honeywell Building, #04-01 Singapore 486073 Asia & Pacific Rim Bangkok, Thailand Colombo, Sri Lanka Gurgaon, India Jakarta, Indonesia Manila, Philippines Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Shenzhen, China Singapore Sydney, Australia Wellington, New Zealand Offices North America Montréal, Canada Durham, NC San Antonio, TX Mexico Mexico D.F. Europe Aix En Provence, France Châtenay-Malabry, France Glasgow, Scotland Hilversum, The Netherlands London, United Kingdom Madrid, Spain Moscow, Russia Nuneaton, United Kingdom Trin-Ljubljana, Slovenia Warsaw, Poland Africa Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire Accra, Ghana Alger, Algeria Lagos, Nigeria Midrand, South Africa Nairobi, Kenya Middle East Dubai, United Arab Emirates Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Forward-looking Statements This Annual Report, including the letter to shareholders, contains forward-looking statements that are based on the views of management regarding future events at the time of publication of this report. These forward-looking statements, which include, but are not limited to: our plans, strategies and objectives for future operations; new products, services or developments; future economic conditions; outlook; impact on operating results due to the volume, timing, customer, product and geographic mix of our product orders; our growth potential and the potential of industries and the markets we serve, are subject to the known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by each forward- looking statement. These risks, uncertainties and other factors are discussed in the 2014 Form 10-K. A-4 A-5 This page intentionally left blank.WWW.AVIATNETWORKS.COM 5200 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054 Tel: 408 567 7000 Fax: 408 567 7001 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above