Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
☐
Registration statement pursuant to section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or
☐
☒
☐
Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
or
Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017
or
Shell company report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of event requiring this shell company report
Commission file number 001-37909
Azure Power Global Limited
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Mauritius
(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
8 Local Shopping Complex
Pushp Vihar, Madangir, New Delhi 110062, India
Telephone: (91-11) 49409800
(Address and Telephone Number of Principal Executive Offices)
Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
Chief Executive Officer
8 Local Shopping Complex
Pushp Vihar, Madangir, New Delhi 110062, India
Telephone: (91-11) 49409800
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile Number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Equity Shares, par value US$0.000625 per share
(Title of Class)
New York Stock Exchange
(Name of Exchange On Which Registered)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
None
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
As of March 31, 2017, 25,915,956 equity shares, par value US$0.000625 per share, were issued and outstanding.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
If this annual report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “emerging growth company” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or
Large accelerated filer ☐
Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☒
Emerging Growth Company ☒
revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ☒
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ☐
Other ☐
If “Other” has been checked in the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 ☐ Item 18 ☐
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes ☐ No ☒
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan
confirmed by a court: Yes ☐ No ☐
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
1
5
5
5
36
49
49
80
92
94
95
96
104
105
106
106
106
107
107
107
107
107
107
108
108
109
109
109
Table of Contents
Except where the context requires otherwise and for purposes of this annual report only:
CONVENTIONS USED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT
•
•
•
•
•
“We,” “us,” the “Company,” the “group,” “Azure” or “our” refers to Azure Power Global Limited, together with its subsidiaries (including Azure
Power India Private Limited, or AZI, its predecessor and current subsidiary).
“Our holding company” refers to Azure Power Global Limited on a standalone basis.
“U.S. GAAP” refers to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States.
“US$” or “U.S. dollars” refers to the legal currency of the United States.
“INR,” “rupees,” or “Indian rupees” refers to the legal currency of India.
In this annual report, references to “U.S.” or the “United States” are to the United States of America, its territories and its possessions. References to “India”
are to the Republic of India. References to “Mauritius” are to the Republic of Mauritius.
Unless otherwise indicated, the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this annual report have been presented in Indian rupees and
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. References to a particular “fiscal” year are to our fiscal year ended March 31 of that year, which is typical in our industry
and in the jurisdictions in which we operate.
This annual report contains translations of certain Indian rupee amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for the convenience of the reader. Unless
otherwise stated, the translation of Indian rupees into U.S. dollars has been made at INR 64.85 to US$1.00, which is the noon buying rate in New York City for
cable transfer in non-U.S. currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on March 31, 2017, which is the date of our last
reported financial statements. We make no representation that the Indian rupee or U.S. dollar amounts referred to in this annual report could have been converted
into U.S. dollars or Indian rupees, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all.
As used in this annual report, all references to watts (e.g., megawatts, gigawatts, kilowatt hour, terawatt hour, MW, GW, kWh, etc.) refer to measurements of
power generated.
The information in this annual report gives effect to a 16-for-1 stock split of our equity shares that was effective on October 6, 2016.
2
Table of Contents
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report contains forward looking statements about our current expectations and views of future events. All statements, other than statements of
historical facts, contained in this annual report, including statements about our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs,
prospects, plans and future megawatt goals of management, are forward looking statements. These statements relate to events that involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those listed under “Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors,” which may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward looking statements. In some
cases, these forward looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,”
“believe,” “potential,” “continue,” “is/are likely to” or other similar expressions.
These forward looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, some of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward
looking statements reflect our current views about future events and are not a guarantee of future performance. Actual outcomes may differ materially from the
information contained in the forward looking statements because of a number of factors, including, without limitation, the risk factors set forth in “Item 3. Key
Information — D. Risk Factors” and the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the pace of government sponsored auctions;
changes in auction rules;
the government’s willingness to enforce Renewable Purchase Obligations, or RPOs;
permitting, development and construction of our project pipeline according to schedule;
solar radiation in the regions in which we operate;
developments in, or changes to, laws, regulations, governmental policies, incentives and taxation affecting our operations;
adverse changes or developments in the industry in which we operate;
our ability to maintain and enhance our market position;
our ability to successfully implement any of our business strategies, including acquiring other companies;
our ability to enter into power purchasing agreements, or PPAs, on acceptable terms, the occurrence of any event that may expose us to certain risks
under our PPAs and the willingness and ability of counterparties to our PPAs to fulfill their obligations;
our ability to borrow additional funds and access capital markets, as well as our substantial indebtedness and the possibility that we may incur
additional indebtedness going forward;
our ability to establish and operate new solar projects;
our ability to compete against traditional and renewable energy companies;
the loss of one or more members of our senior management or key employees;
political and economic conditions in India;
material changes in the costs of solar panels and other equipment required for our operations;
fluctuations in inflation, interest rates and exchange rates;
other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the caption “Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors.”
3
Table of Contents
The forward looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this annual
report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should read this annual report
and the documents that we reference in this annual report and have filed as exhibits with the SEC, of which this annual report is a part, completely and with the
understanding that our actual future results or performance may be materially different from what we expect.
This annual report also contains statistical data and estimates, including those relating to the solar industry and our competition from market research, analyst
reports and other publicly available sources. These publications include forward looking statements being made by the authors of such reports. These forward
looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or
implied in the forward looking statements.
4
Table of Contents
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
A. Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated statement of operations data for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 and the selected consolidated
balance sheet data as of March 31, 2016 and 2017, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Selected consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2015 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this annual
report. Our consolidated financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with US GAAP. Our historical results do not necessarily indicate our results
expected for any future period.
The following information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects” and the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.
Consolidated Statement of Operations data:
Operating revenues:
Sale of power
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of operations (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
General and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating costs and expenses:
Operating income
Other expense:
Interest expense, net
Loss (gain) on foreign currency exchange, net
Total other expenses
Loss before income tax
Income tax expense
Net loss
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
Net loss attributable to APGL
Accretion to Mezzanine CCPS
Accretion to redeemable non-controlling interest
Net loss attributable to APGL equity shareholders
Net loss per share attributable to APGL equity stockholders
Basic and diluted
Shares used in computing basic and diluted per share amounts:
Weighted average shares
5
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2015 (1)
(INR)
2016 (1)
(INR)
2017
(INR)
2017 (2)
(US$)
(In thousands)
1,124,138
2,626,148
4,182,985
64,502
79,816
425,952
322,430
828,198
295,940
190,648
672,841
687,781
1,551,270
1,074,878
375,787
797,161
1,046,565
2,219,513
1,963,472
5,795
12,292
16,138
34,225
30,277
831,790
299,628
1,131,418
(835,478)
(253,112)
(1,088,590)
(5,595)
(1,082,995)
(755,207)
—
(1,838,202)
2,058,836
343,137
2,401,973
(1,327,095)
(327,745)
(1,654,840)
(4,651)
(1,650,189)
(1,347,923)
(29,825)
(3,027,937)
2,371,836
(109,128)
2,262,708
(299,236)
(892,333)
(1,191,569)
(18,924)
(1,172,645)
(235,853)
(44,073)
(1,452,571)
36,574
(1,683)
34,891
(4,614)
(13,760)
(18,374)
(292)
(18,082)
(3,637)
(680)
(22,399)
(1,046)
(1,722)
(111)
(1.72)
1,758,080
1,758,080 13,040,618
—
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated statement of financial position as of March 31, 2015, 2016, and 2017:
Balance Sheet data:
Cash, cash equivalents, and current investments available for sale
Property, plant and equipment, net
Total assets
Compulsorily convertible debentures and Series E & Series G compulsorily convertible preferred
As of March 31,
2015 (1)
(INR)
2016 (1)
(INR)
2017
(INR)
2017 (2)
(US$)
(in thousands)
2,044,290
15,145,674
19,923,708
3,090,386
24,381,429
30,890,840
8,757,467 135,042
40,942,608 631,343
57,493,965 886,568
shares (3)
Project level and other debt (4)
Mezzanine CCPS shares (5)
Total APGL shareholders’ (deficit)/equity
Total shareholders’ (deficit)/equity and liabilities
2,461,200
15,271,653
4,689,942
(4,447,154)
19,923,708
3,600,700
20,487,951
9,733,272
(7,437,447)
30,890,840
—
—
35,157,808 542,140
—
13,222,130 203,889
57,493,965 886,568
—
Notes:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Includes consolidated financial data of AZI prior to July 2015, since, the Company was incorporated in 2015, and AZI is considered as the predecessor of the
Company.
Translation of balances in the consolidated balance sheets and the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, shareholders’ (deficit)/equity
and cash flows from INR into US$, as of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 are solely for the convenience of the readers and were calculated at
the rate of US$1.00 = INR 64.85, the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in non U.S. currencies, as certified for customs purposes by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York on March 31, 2017. No representation is made that the INR amounts could have been, or could be, converted, realized or
settled into US$ at that rate on March 31, 2017, or at any other rate.
The Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares were classified as a current liability in the consolidated balance sheet because the
preference shareholders had a right to convert their shares into variable number of equity shares to give them their required returns.
This balance represents the short term and long-term portion of project level secured term loans and other secured bank loans. It is net of ancillary cost of
borrowing of INR 909,131 (US$ 14,019) as on March 31, 2017 and INR 438,172 million as on March 31, 2016.
Compulsorily convertible preferred shares include the Mezzanine CCPS and are classified as temporary equity in the consolidated balance sheet.
Note: There may be differences due to rounding
EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION
The consolidated financial statements and other financial data included in this annual report are presented in Indian rupees. Azure Power Global Limited’s
functional currency is the U.S. dollar and reporting currency is the Indian rupee. Further, AZI’s functional currency is Indian rupees. The functional currencies of
AZI’s subsidiaries are their respective local country currencies. The translation from the applicable foreign currencies of AZI’s subsidiaries into Indian rupees is
performed for balance sheet accounts using the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date except for shareholders’ equity, preferred shares and certain
debt, which are translated at the historical rates in effect at the dates of the underlying transactions. Revenue, expense and cash flow items are translated using
average exchange rates for the respective period.
U.S. dollar balances have been translated from Indian rupee amounts solely for the convenience of the readers. The following table sets forth, for each of the
periods indicated, the low, average, high and period-end noon buying rates in The City of New York for cable transfers, in Indian rupees per U.S. dollar, as certified
for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These rates are provided solely for your
6
Table of Contents
convenience and are not necessarily the exchange rates that we used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements or elsewhere in this annual report or
will use in the preparation of our periodic reports or any other information to be provided to you. We make no representation that any Indian rupee or U.S. dollar
amounts referred to in this annual report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Indian rupees, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all.
The following table sets forth information concerning exchange rates between INR and the US$ for the periods indicated:
Period
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
December
2017:
January
February
March
April
May
June (through June 9)
INR per US$
Noon Buying Rate
Average
(1)
46.86
53.41
58.91
61.21
64.15
67.16
67.81
Low
44.00
48.65
52.99
58.30
61.41
66.05
67.38
Period End
53.01
54.86
61.92
63.04
66.15
67.92
67.92
67.48
66.67
64.85
64.27
64.50
64.24
68.05
66.97
65.80
64.54
64.42
64.35
67.48
66.67
64.85
64.08
64.03
64.24
High
53.71
57.13
68.80
63.67
67.10
68.86
68.29
68.39
67.40
66.83
65.10
64.87
64.42
(1)
Averages for a period other than one month are calculated by using the average of the noon buying rate at the end of each month during the period. Monthly
averages are calculated by using the average of the daily noon buying rates during the relevant month.
Source: Federal Reserve Statistical Release
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable
D. Risk Factors
If
any
of
the
following
risks
actually
occur,
our
business,
financial
condition,
results
of
operations
and
cash
flows
could
be
materially
and
adversely
affected.
In
that
event,
the
trading
price
of
our
equity
shares
could
decline,
and
you
may
lose
part
or
all
of
your
investment.
This
annual
report
also
contains
forward-
looking
information
that
involves
risks
and
uncertainties.
Our
actual
results
could
differ
materially
from
those
anticipated
in
these
forward-looking
statements
as
a
result
of
many
factors,
including
the
risks
described
below
and
elsewhere
in
this
annual
report.
Risks Related to Us and Our Industry
We have never been profitable, and believe we may continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future.
We have incurred losses since our inception, including a net loss of US$18.4 million for fiscal year 2017. We believe that we may continue to incur net
losses as we expect to make continued significant investment in
7
Table of Contents
our solar projects. As of March 31, 2017, we operated 32 utility scale projects and several commercial rooftop projects with a combined rated capacity of 651 MW.
As of March 31, 2017, we were also constructing eight projects with a combined rated capacity of 354 MW and had an additional 64 MW of projects committed,
bringing our total portfolio capacity to 1,069 MW. A significant number of power projects are presently committed and under construction, and we can only
monetize them, if at all, after each project is completed, which is subject to several factors, including receiving regulatory approvals, obtaining project funding,
entering into transmission arrangements with the central or state transmission utilities, and acquiring land for projects. In addition, even after a project is
operational, the monetization process may be quite long term with contracts running up to 25 years. Moreover, we may not succeed in addressing certain risks,
including our ability to successfully develop or supervise the commissioning, operations and maintenance of our projects or maintain adequate control of our costs
and expenses. Also, we may find that our growth plans are costlier than we anticipate and that they do not ultimately result in commensurate increases in revenue,
which would further increase our losses. Additionally, we have not, and likely will not in the foreseeable future, generate sufficient cash flow required for our
growth plans. We expect we may continue to experience losses, some of which could be significant. Results of operations will depend upon numerous factors, some
of which are beyond our control, including the availability of preferential feed-in tariffs for solar power and other subsidies, global liquidity and competition.
The reduction, modification or elimination of central and state government subsidies and economic incentives in India may reduce the economic benefits of
our existing solar projects and our opportunities to develop or acquire suitable new solar projects.
The development and profitability of renewable energy projects in the locations in which we operate are dependent on policy and regulatory frameworks that
support such developments. The cost of generating electricity from solar energy in India currently exceeds, and very likely will continue to exceed for the
foreseeable future, the cost of generating electricity from conventional energy sources such as domestic coal. These subsidies and incentives have been primarily in
the form of preferential tariffs, project cost subsidies, tax incentives, tax holidays, and other incentives to end users, distributors, system integrators and
manufacturers of solar energy products. For instance, the National Tariff Policy 2006 requires State Electricity Regulatory Commissions, or SERCs, to set
Renewable Purchase Obligations, or RPOs, on their distribution companies of solar energy, and provides that procurement of electricity by such distribution
companies must be done at preferential tariffs, which is determined by the relevant SERC from time to time. Further, the Indian Ministry of New and Renewable
Energy, or the MNRE, has introduced the generation based incentive scheme to support small grid solar projects, pursuant to which the MNRE will pay incentives
to the state utilities when they directly purchase solar power from project developers. Also, MNRE has introduced providing customs and excise duty exemptions
to all rooftops Solar PV Power Projects for a minimum capacity of 100 kw. Further, India’s Income Tax Act, 1961 as amended, provides for certain tax benefits,
including 100% tax deductions of the profits derived from generation of power for any 10 consecutive years, out of the first 15 years, beginning from the year in
which project is completed. However, the exemption was only available to the projects completed on or before March 31, 2017. In addition, certain state policies
also provide subsidies and economic incentives. For instance, the state policy in Punjab provides certain tax exemptions, including in relation to supply of capital
goods used for setting up projects.
The availability and size of such subsidies and incentives depend, to a large extent, on political and policy developments relating to environmental concerns
in India and are typically available only for a specified time. Generally, the amount of government subsidy for solar projects has been decreasing as the cost of
producing energy has approached grid parity. Changes in central and state policies could lead to a significant reduction in or a discontinuation of the support for
renewable energies. Reductions in government subsidies and economic incentives that apply to future solar projects could diminish the availability of our
opportunities to continue to develop or acquire suitable newly developed solar projects. Such reductions may also apply retroactively to existing solar projects,
which could significantly reduce the economic benefits we receive from our existing solar projects. Moreover, some of the solar program subsidies and incentives
expire or decline over time, are limited in
8
Table of Contents
total funding, require renewal from regulatory authorities or require us to meet certain investment or performance criteria. In addition, although various SERCs
have specified RPOs for their distribution companies, the implementation of RPO schemes has not been uniform across Indian states. Although states are beginning
to enforce RPOs under the guidance from the central government, RPOs have historically been breached without consequences.
Additionally, we may not continue to qualify for such subsidies and incentives. We may choose to implement other solar power projects, such as rooftop
projects, that are outside the scope of such subsidies and incentives.
Further, increased emphasis on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the possibility of trading carbon dioxide emission quotas has led to extra duties being
levied on sources of energy, primarily fossil fuels, which cause carbon dioxide pollution. The imposition of these duties has indirectly supported the expansion of
power generated from renewable energy and, in turn, solar projects in general. If such direct and indirect government support for renewable energy were terminated
or reduced, it would make producing electricity from solar projects less competitive and reduce demand for new solar projects.
A significant reduction in the scope or discontinuation of government incentive programs in our markets could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.
Our long term growth depends in part on the Indian government’s ability to meet its announced targeted capacity.
The Indian government increased its 2022 target for solar capacity from 20 GW to 100 GW. However, new capacity additions have historically been lower
than the government’s announced targeted capacity. For example, actual capacity additions represented only 70% of the targeted capacity of 78.7GW in the
Eleventh Five-Year Plan. This shortfall in capacity additions was due to issues in timely commissioning of conventional power plants, which included delays in
land acquisition, obtaining regulatory permits and difficulties in securing reliable and cost efficient fuel supplies. Under the prior Five Year Plans before the
Eleventh Five-Year Plan, solar capacity targets were not included. As such, there is a short track record of meeting solar capacity targets. As for reaching target
capacity for other renewable energy sources, in certain Five Year Plans those targets were met while others have fallen short. Any failure to meet the government’s
targeted solar capacity may result in a slowdown in our growth opportunities and adversely affect our ability to achieve our long term business objectives, targets
and goals.
Our operations are subject to extensive governmental, health, safety and environmental regulations, which require us to obtain and comply with the terms of
various approvals, licenses and permits. Any failure to obtain, renew or comply with the terms of such approvals, licenses and permits in a timely manner or at
all may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
The power generation business in India is subject to a broad range of environmental, health, safety and other laws and regulations. These laws and
regulations require us to obtain and maintain a number of approvals, licenses, registrations and permits for developing and operating power projects. Additionally,
we may need to apply for more approvals in the future, including renewal of approvals that may expire from time to time. For example, we require various
approvals during construction of our solar projects and prior to the commissioning certificate is issued, including capacity allocation and capacity transfer
approvals, approvals from the local pollution control boards, evacuation and grid connectivity approvals and approval from the chief electrical inspector for
installation and energization of electrical installations at the solar project sites. In addition, we are required to comply with state-specific requirements. Certain
approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner. Certain approvals may also be granted on a provisional basis or for a limited duration and require renewal. If the
conditions specified therein are not satisfied at a later date, we may not be able to evacuate power from these projects.
In addition, we could be affected by the adoption or implementation of new safety, health and environmental laws and regulations, new interpretations of
existing laws, increased governmental enforcement of
9
Table of Contents
environmental laws or other similar developments in the future. For instance, we currently fall under an exemption granted to solar photovoltaic projects that
exempts us from complying with the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, issued under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. While we are
required to obtain consents to establish and operate in certain Indian states under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Air (Prevention and
Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008, certain state policies in relation to
solar projects exempt us from obtaining such consents or have reduced or simplified procedural requirements for obtaining such consents. However, there can be no
assurance that we will not be subject to any such consent requirements in the future, and that we will be able to obtain and maintain such consents or clearances in a
timely manner, or at all, or that we will not become subject to any regulatory action on account of not having obtained or renewed such clearances in any past
periods. Furthermore, our government approvals and licenses are subject to numerous conditions, some of which are onerous and require us to make substantial
expenditure. We may incur substantial costs, including clean up or remediation costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, and third-party property damage or
personal injury claims, as a result of any violations of or liabilities under environmental or health and safety laws or noncompliance with permits and approvals,
which, as a result, may have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to apply for or renew any approvals, licenses, registrations or permits in a timely manner, or at all, and that the
relevant authorities will issue any of such approvals, licenses, registrations or permits in the time frames anticipated by us. Further, we cannot assure you that the
approvals, licenses, registrations and permits issued to us would not be subject to suspension or revocation for non-compliance or alleged non-compliance with any
terms or conditions thereof, or pursuant to any regulatory action. Any failure to apply for, renew and obtain the required approvals, licenses, registrations or
permits, or any suspension or revocation of any of the approvals, licenses, registrations and permits that have been or may be issued to us, or any onerous
conditions made applicable to us in terms of such approvals, licenses, registrations or permits may impede the successful commissioning and operations of our
power projects, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Our limited operating history, especially with large-scale solar projects, may not serve as an adequate basis to judge our future prospects, results of operations
and cash flows.
We began our business in 2008 and have a limited operating history. We established our first utility scale solar plant in India in 2009. As of March 31, 2017,
we operated 32 utility scale projects and several commercial rooftop projects with a combined rated capacity of 651 MW. As of March 31, 2017, we were also
constructing eight projects with a combined rated capacity of 354 MW and had an additional 64 MW of projects committed, bringing our total portfolio capacity to
1,069 MW. Accordingly, our relatively limited operating history may not be an adequate basis for evaluating our business prospects and financial performance, and
makes it difficult to predict the future results of our operations. Period-to-period comparisons of our operating results and our results of operations for any period
should not be relied upon as an indication of our performance for any future period. In particular, our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and
future success depend, to a significant extent, on our ability to continue to identify suitable sites, acquire land for solar projects, obtain required regulatory
approvals, arrange financing from various sources, construct solar projects in a cost-effective and timely manner, expand our project pipeline and manage and
operate solar projects that we develop. If we cannot do so, we may not be able to expand our business at a profit or at all, maintain our competitive position, satisfy
our contractual obligations, or sustain growth and profitability.
Our operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, which could make our future performance difficult to predict and could cause our operating
results for a particular period to fall below expectations, resulting in a severe decline in the price of our equity shares.
Our quarterly operating results are difficult to predict and may fluctuate significantly in the future. We have experienced seasonal and quarterly fluctuations
in the past, especially in the winter months. However, given that we are an early-stage company operating in a rapidly growing industry, those fluctuations may be
masked by our
10
Table of Contents
recent growth rates and thus may not be readily apparent from our historical operating results. As such, our past quarterly operating results may not be good
indicators of future performance.
In addition to the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section, the following factors could cause our operating results to fluctuate:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the expiration or initiation of any central or state subsidies or incentives;
our ability to complete installations in a timely manner due to market conditions or due to unavailable financing;
our ability to continue to expand our operations, and the amount and timing of expenditures related to such expansions;
announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital-raising activities or commitments;
changes in auction rules;
changes in feed-in tariff rates for solar power, viability gap funding, or VGF, our pricing policies or terms or those of our competitors;
actual or anticipated developments in our competitors’ businesses or the competitive landscape;
an occurrence of low global horizontal irradiation that affects our generation of solar power.
For these or other reasons, the results of any prior quarterly or annual periods should not be relied upon as indications of our future performance. In addition,
our actual revenue, key operating and financial metrics and other operating results in future quarters may fall short of the expectations of investors and financial
analysts, which could have a severe adverse effect on the trading price of our equity shares.
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As of March 31, 2017, we had US$71.0 million in current liabilities, excluding the current portion of long-term debt and short-term debt, and
US$542.1 million in outstanding long-term borrowings, including the current portion of long-term debt and short-term debt. Generally, these borrowings relate to
the financing for our projects and are secured by project assets.
Our debt could have significant consequences on our operations, including:
•
•
•
•
•
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes as a result of
our debt service obligations;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business, the industry in which we operate and the general economy;
potentially increasing the cost of any additional financing; and
limiting the ability of our project operating subsidiaries to pay dividends to us for working capital or return on our investment.
In addition, our borrowings under certain project-specific financing arrangement have floating rates of interest. Therefore, an increase or decrease in interest
rates will increase or decrease our interest expense associated with such borrowing. A significant increase in interest expense could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows impacting our ability to meet our payment obligations under our debt.
11
Table of Contents
Any of these factors and other consequences that may result from our substantial indebtedness could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows impacting our ability to meet our payment obligations under our debt. Our ability to meet our payment obligations
under our outstanding debt depends on our ability to generate significant cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial,
competitive, legislative and regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our control.
Our growth prospects and future profitability depend to a significant extent on global liquidity and the availability of additional funding options with
acceptable terms.
We require a significant amount of cash to fund the installation and construction of our projects and other aspects of our operations, and expect to incur
additional borrowings in the future, as our business and operations grow. We may also require additional cash due to changing business conditions or other future
developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue in order to remain competitive.
Historically, we have used loans, equity contributions, and government subsidies to fund our project development. We expect to expand our business with
proceeds from third-party financing options, including any bank loans, equity partners, financial leases and securitization. However, we cannot guarantee that we
will be successful in locating additional suitable sources of financing in the time periods required or at all, or on terms or at costs that we find attractive or
acceptable, which may render it impossible for us to fully execute our growth plan. In addition, rising interest rates could adversely impact our ability to secure
financing on favorable terms.
Installing and constructing solar projects requires significant upfront capital expenditure and there may be a significant delay before we can recoup our
investments through the long-term recurring revenue of our solar projects. Our ability to obtain external financing is subject to a number of uncertainties, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
our future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows;
the general condition of global equity and debt capital markets;
our credit ratings and past credit history;
decline of the Indian rupee compared to U.S. dollar;
regulatory and government support in the form of tax incentives, preferential tariffs, project cost subsidies and other incentives;
the continued confidence of banks and other financial institutions in our company and the solar power industry;
economic, political and other conditions in the jurisdictions where we operate; and
our ability to comply with any financial covenants under our debt financing.
Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to our shareholders and any debt financing may contain restrictive covenants that limit our flexibility going
forward. Furthermore, our credit ratings may be downgraded, which would adversely affect our ability to refinance debt and increase our cost of borrowing. Failure
to manage discretionary spending and raise additional capital or debt financing as required may adversely impact our ability to achieve our intended business
objectives.
If we fail to comply with financial and other covenants under our loan agreements, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and business
prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
We expect to continue to finance a significant portion of our project development and construction costs with project financing. The agreements with respect
to our existing project-level indebtedness contain financial and other covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios or impose certain restrictions on
disposition of our assets or the conduct of our business. In addition, we typically pledge our solar project assets
12
Table of Contents
or account or trade receivables, and in certain cases, shares of the special purpose vehicles, to raise debt financing, and we are restricted from creating additional
security over our assets. Such account or trade receivables will include all income generated from the sale of electricity in the solar projects.
Our financing agreements also include certain restrictive covenants whereby we may be required to obtain approval from our lenders to, among other things,
incur additional debt, undertake guarantee obligations, enter into any scheme of merger, amalgamation, compromise, demerger or reconstruction, change our
capital structure and controlling interest, dispose of or sell assets, transfer shares held by major shareholders to third parties, invest by way of share capital, lend and
advance funds, declare dividends in the event of any default in repayment of debts or failure to maintain financial ratios, place deposits and change our
management structure. Most of our lenders also impose significant restrictions in relation to our solar projects, under the terms of the relevant project loans taken
by our respective subsidiaries. For example, we are required to obtain lenders’ consent to make any changes to, or terminate, project documents, waive any material
claims or defaults under the project documents, make any changes to financing plans relating to our projects, and replace suppliers or other material project
participants. There can be no assurance that such consent will be granted in a timely manner, or at all. In the event that such lender consents are granted, they may
impose certain additional conditions on us, which may limit our operational flexibility or subject us to increased scrutiny by the relevant lenders. The time required
to secure consents may hinder us from taking advantage of a dynamic market environment. These agreements also grant certain lenders the right to appoint
nominee directors on the Board of Directors of AZI or its subsidiaries and require us to maintain certain ratings or other levels of credit worthiness. If we breach
any financial or other covenants contained in any of our financing arrangements, we may be required to immediately repay our borrowings either in whole or in
part, together with any related costs.
Our failure to comply with financial or restrictive covenants or periodic reporting requirements or to obtain our lenders’ consent to take restricted actions in a
timely manner or at all may result in the declaration of an event of default by one or more of our lenders, which may accelerate repayment of the relevant loans or
trigger cross defaults under other financing agreements. We cannot assure you that, in the event of any such acceleration, we will have sufficient resources to repay
these borrowings. Failure to meet our obligations under the debt financing agreements could have an adverse effect on our cash flows, business and results of
operations. Furthermore, a breach of those financial and other covenants or a failure to meet certain financial ratios under these financing agreements will also
restrict our ability to pay dividends.
Any default or failure by us to repay our loans in a timely manner or at all could impact the ability of two of our directors who have personally guaranteed a
portion of our loans to further guarantee their indebtedness and cause an adverse effect on our business and results of operation.
Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa have personally guaranteed one of AZI’s loan in connection with the working capital
facility provided by the Central Bank of India, for a total of INR 1,980.0 million, in favor of the lender.
Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa have also provided personal guarantees in favor of the Central Bank of India for the
repayment for loans of three of our project subsidiaries in the amounts of INR 217 million, INR 586 million and INR 1,201 million in addition to the payment of
any interest and other monies payable to the lender.
Any default or failure by any of the three project subsidiaries to repay these loans in a timely manner, or at all, could trigger repayment obligations on the
part of Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa. This could impact their ability to provide guarantee for our business.
The delay between making significant upfront investments in our solar projects and receiving revenue could materially and adversely affect our liquidity,
business, results of operations and cash flows.
There are generally several months between our initial bid in renewable energy auctions to build solar projects and the date on which we begin to recognize
revenue from the sale of electricity generated by such solar
13
Table of Contents
projects. Our initial investments include, without limitation, legal, accounting and other third-party fees, costs associated with project analysis and feasibility study,
payments for land rights, payments for interconnection and grid connectivity arrangements, government permits, engineering and procurement of solar panels,
balance of system costs or other payments, which may be non-refundable. As such, projects may not be fully monetized for 25 years given the average length of our
PPAs, but we bear the costs of our initial investment upfront. Furthermore, we have historically relied on our own equity contribution and bank loans to pay for
costs and expenses incurred during project development. Solar projects typically generate revenue only after becoming commercially operational and starting to sell
electricity to the power grid through offtakers. There may be long delays from the initial bid to projects becoming shovel-ready, due to the timing of auctions,
permitting and grid connectivity process. Between our initial investment in the development of permits for solar projects and their connection to the transmission
grid, there may be adverse developments, such as unfavorable environmental or geological conditions, labor strikes, panel shortages or monsoon weather.
Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain all of the permits as anticipated, permits that were obtained may expire or become ineffective and we may not be able to
obtain project level debt financing as anticipated. In addition, the timing gap between our upfront investments and actual generation of revenue, or any added delay
in between due to unforeseen events, could put strains on our liquidity and resources, and materially and adversely affect our profitability, results of operations and
cash flows.
Solar project development is challenging and our growth strategy may ultimately not be successful, which can have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The development and construction of solar projects involve numerous risks and uncertainties and require extensive research, planning and due diligence. We
may be required to incur significant capital expenditures for land and interconnection rights, regulatory approvals, preliminary engineering, permits, and legal and
other expenses before we can determine whether a solar project is economically, technologically or otherwise feasible.
We intend to expand our business significantly with a number of new projects in both new and existing jurisdictions in the future. As we grow, we expect to
encounter additional challenges to our internal processes, external construction management, capital commitment process, project funding infrastructure and
financing capabilities. Our existing operations, personnel, systems and internal control may not be adequate to support our growth and expansion and may require
us to make additional unanticipated investments in our infrastructure. To manage the future growth of our operations, we will be required to improve our
administrative, operational and financial systems, procedures and controls, and maintain, expand, train and manage our growing employee base. We will need to
hire and train project development personnel to expand and manage our project development efforts. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may
not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, execute our business strategies successfully or respond to competitive pressures. As a result, our business,
prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Success in executing our growth strategy is contingent upon, among others:
•
•
•
•
•
accurately prioritizing geographic markets for entry, including estimates on addressable market demand;
managing local operational, capital investment or components sourcing in compliance with regulatory requirements;
negotiating favorable payment terms with suppliers;
collecting economic incentives as expected; and
signing PPAs or other arrangements that are commercially acceptable, including adequate financing.
We may not be able to find suitable sites for the development of solar projects.
Solar projects require solar and geological conditions that are not available in all areas. Further, large, utility scale solar projects must be interconnected to
the power grid in order to deliver electricity, which requires us to
14
Table of Contents
find suitable sites with capacity on the power grid available. We may encounter difficulties registering certain leasehold interest in such sites. Even when we have
identified a desirable site for a solar project, our ability to obtain site control with respect to the site is subject to our ability to finance the transaction and growing
competition from other solar power producers that may have better access to local government support or financial or other resources. If we are unable to find or
obtain site control for suitable sites on commercially acceptable terms, our ability to develop new solar projects on a timely basis or at all might be harmed, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, our land leases for projects are typically for 30 to 35
years, but our PPAs are generally for a term of 25 years. If we are not able to sell the power produced by our systems after the initial PPA has expired, our liquidity
and financial condition may be harmed.
We face uncertainties in our ability to acquire the rights to develop and generate power from new solar projects due to highly competitive PPA auctions and
possible changes in the auction process.
We acquire the rights to develop and generate power from new solar projects through a competitive bidding process, in which we compete for project awards
based on, among other things, pricing, technical and engineering expertise, financial conditions, including specified minimum net worth criteria, availability of
land, financing capabilities and track record. The bidding and selection process is also affected by a number of factors, including factors which may be beyond our
control, such as market conditions or government incentive programs. If we misjudge our competitiveness when submitting our bids or if we fail to lower our costs
to submit competitive bids, we may not acquire the rights on new solar projects. Furthermore, we have expected prices for system components to decline as part of
our bidding process, and if that does not occur, our project economics may be harmed and we may need greater subsidies to remain economically viable.
In addition, rules of the auction process may change. Each state in India has its own regulatory framework and several states have their own renewable
energy policy. The rules governing the various regional power markets may change from time to time, in some cases, in a way that is contrary to our interests and
adverse to our financial returns. For example, most national auctions currently use the reverse auction structure, in which several winners take part in the same
project. There can be no assurance that the central and state governments will continue to allow us to utilize such bidding structures and any shift away from the
current structures, such as to a Dutch auction, could increase the competition and adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
We face significant competition from traditional and renewable energy companies.
We face significant competition in the markets in which we operate. Our primary competitors are local and international developers and operators of solar
projects and other renewable energy sources. We also compete with utilities generating power from conventional fossil fuels. Recent deregulation of the Indian
power sector and increased private sector investment have intensified the competition we face. The Electricity Act, 2003, or the Electricity Act, removed certain
licensing requirements for power generation companies, provided for open access to transmission and distribution networks and also facilitated additional capacity
generation through captive power projects. These reforms provide opportunities for increased private sector participation in power generation. Specifically, the
open access reform enables private power generators to sell power directly to distribution companies and, ultimately, to the end consumers, enhancing the financial
viability of private investment in power generation. Competitive bidding for power procurement further increases competition among power generators and
recently there have been bids that were less than INR 3.00 per kilowatt hour. Furthermore, the data released by the Central Electricity Authority in June 2016
provided that India is likely to experience surplus power for the year 2016-17. This could lead to greater pricing pressures for energy producers in the future. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively, and our failure to do so could result in an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
cash flows.
Furthermore, our competitors may have greater operational, financial, technical, management or other resources than we do and may be able to achieve
better economies of scale and lower cost of capital, allowing
15
Table of Contents
them to bid in the same auction at more competitive rates. Our competitors may also have a more effective or established localized business presence or a greater
willingness or ability to operate with little or no operating margins for sustained periods of time. Our market position depends on our financing, development and
operation capabilities, reputation and track record. Any increase in competition during the bidding process or reduction in our competitive capabilities could have a
significant adverse impact on our market share and on the margins we generate from our solar projects.
Our competitors may also enter into strategic alliances or form affiliates with other competitors to our detriment. As our competitors grow in scale, they may
establish in-house engineering, procurement and construction, or EPC, and operations and maintenance, or O&M, capabilities, which may offset a current
advantage we may have over them. Moreover, suppliers or contractors may merge with our competitors which may limit our choices of suppliers or contractors and
hence the flexibility of our overall project execution capabilities. For example, some of our competitors may have their own internal solar panel manufacturing
capabilities. As the solar energy industry grows and evolves, we will also face new competitors who are not currently in the market. There can be no assurance that
our current or potential competitors will not win bids for solar projects or offer services comparable or superior to those that we offer at the same or lower prices or
adapt to market demand more quickly than we do. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share.
In addition, we face competition from developers of other renewable energy facilities, including wind, biomass, nuclear and hydropower. If these non-solar
renewable sources become more financially viable, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Competition from such
producers may increase if the technology used to generate electricity from these other renewable energy sources becomes more sophisticated, or if the Indian
government elects to further strengthen its support of such renewable energy sources relative to solar energy. As we also compete with utilities generating power
from conventional fossil fuels, a reduction in the price of coal or diesel would make the development of solar energy less economically attractive and we would be
at a competitive disadvantage.
Any constraints in the availability of the electricity grid, including our inability to obtain access to transmission lines in a timely and cost-efficient manner
could adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Distributing power to a purchaser is our responsibility. We generally rely on transmission lines and other transmission and distribution facilities that are
owned and operated by the respective state governments or public entities. Where we do not have access to available transmission and distribution networks, we
may engage contractors to build transmission lines and other related infrastructure. In such a case, we will be exposed to additional costs and risks associated with
developing transmission lines and other related infrastructure, such as the ability to obtain right of way from land owners for the construction of our transmission
lines, which may delay and increase the costs of our projects. We may not be able to secure access to the available transmission and distribution networks at
reasonable prices, in a timely manner or at all.
Further, some of our projects may have limited access to transmission and distribution networks. India’s physical infrastructure, including its electricity grid,
is less developed than that of many developed countries. As a result of grid constraints, such as grid congestion and restrictions on transmission capacity of the grid,
the transmission and dispatch of the full output of our projects may be curtailed, particularly because we are required to distribute power to customers across long
distances from our project sites. We may have to stop producing electricity during the period when electricity cannot be transmitted. Such events could reduce the
net power generation of our projects. If construction of renewable energy projects outpaces transmission capacity of electricity grids, we may be dependent on the
construction and upgrade of grid infrastructure by the government or public entities. We cannot assure you that the relevant government or public entities will do so
in a timely manner, or at all. The curtailment of our power projects’ output levels will reduce our electricity output and limit operational efficiencies, which in turn
could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows.
16
Table of Contents
There are a limited number of purchasers of utility scale quantities of electricity which exposes us and our utility scale projects to risk.
In fiscal year 2016 and 2017, we derived 88.2% and 82.6%, respectively, of our revenue from our top five customers, respectively. Since the transmission
and distribution of electricity are either monopolized or highly concentrated in most jurisdictions, there are a limited number of possible purchasers for utility scale
quantities of electricity in a given geographic location, including transmission grid operators and central and state run utilities. For instance, for projects established
pursuant to the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission, or NSM, solar project developers are required to enter into PPAs with specified implementation agencies.
As a result, there is a concentrated pool of potential buyers for electricity generated by our plants and projects, which may restrict our ability to negotiate favorable
terms under new PPAs and could impact our ability to find new customers for the electricity generated by our generation facilities should this become necessary.
Furthermore, if the financial condition of these utilities and/or power purchasers deteriorate or the NSM or other solar policy to which they are currently
subject and that compel them to source renewable energy supplies change, demand for electricity produced by our plants could be negatively impacted.
Counterparties to our PPAs may not fulfill their obligations which could result in a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
We generate electricity income primarily pursuant to PPAs entered into with central and state government-run utilities. Some of the customers may become
subject to insolvency or liquidation proceedings during the term of the relevant contracts, and the credit support received from such customers may not be sufficient
to cover our losses in the event of a failure to perform. There may also be delays associated with collection of receivables from government owned or controlled
entities on account of the financial condition of these entities that deteriorated significantly in the past. Where we are selling power to non-governmental entities,
we take into account the credit ratings assigned by rating agencies and our ability in the past to collect when assessing the counterparties’ creditworthiness.
Governmental entities to which we sell power do not have credit ratings, so there are no credit ratings to consider. For illustrative purposes, Moody’s Investor
Services Inc. and Standard and Poor’s Financial Services LLC have rated the Government of India Baa3 and BBB-, respectively. As a result, many of the state
governments in India, if rated, would likely rate lower than the Government of India. Although the central and state governments in India have taken steps to
improve the liquidity, financial condition and viability of state electricity distribution utility companies, there can be no assurance that the utility companies that are
currently our customers will have the resources to pay on time or at all.
In addition, our PPA customers may, for any reason, become unable or unwilling to fulfill their related contractual obligations, refuse to accept delivery of
power delivered thereunder or otherwise terminate such agreements prior to the expiration thereof. If such events occur, our assets, liabilities, business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. For instance, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited had filed a petition with
the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, seeking recalculation on the basis of actual cash flow required for development of solar projects and consequent
revision of the tariff payable by it, in relation to certain solar power projects including our 10 MW Gujarat 1 project. While the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory
Commission and the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity dismissed the claims made by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, an appeal is pending with the Supreme
Court of India.
Furthermore, to the extent any of our customers are, or are controlled by, governmental entities, bringing actions against them to enforce their contractual
obligations is often difficult. Also, our facilities may be subject to legislative or other political action that may impair their contractual performance.
Our PPAs may expose us to certain risks that may affect our future results of operations and cash flows.
Our profitability is largely a function of our ability to manage our costs during the terms of our PPAs and operate our power projects at optimal levels. If we
are unable to manage our costs effectively or operate our
17
Table of Contents
power projects at optimal levels, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected. In the event we default in fulfilling our obligations under the
PPAs, such as supplying the minimum amount of power specified in some of the PPAs or failing to obtain regulatory approvals, licenses and clearances with
respect to our solar projects, we may be liable for penalties and in certain specified events, customers may also terminate such PPAs. Further, any failure to supply
power from the scheduled commercial operation date my result in levy of liquidated damages and encashment of bank guarantees provided by us under the terms of
certain PPAs. The termination of any of our projects by our customers would adversely affect our reputation, business, results of operations and cash flows.
Under a long-term PPA, we typically sell power generated from a power plant to state distribution companies at pre-determined tariffs. Our PPAs are
generally not subject to downward revisions unless we elect to utilize accelerated rate of depreciation or if there is a delay in commissioning our projects, although
we have entered into contracts that provide for downward adjustments in the past and may do so in the future. Accordingly, if there is an industry-wide increase in
tariffs or if we are seeking an extension of the term of the PPA, we will not be able to renegotiate the terms of the PPA to take advantage of the increased tariffs. In
addition, in the event of increased operational costs, we will not have the ability to reflect a corresponding increase in our tariffs. Further, any delay in
commissioning projects or supplying electricity during the term of the PPA may result in reduction in tariffs, based on the terms of the PPA. Therefore, the prices at
which we supply power may have little or no relationship with the costs incurred in generating power, which may lead to fluctuations in our margins. The above
factors all limit our business flexibility, expose us to an increased risk of unforeseen business and industry changes and could have an adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and cash flows.
The term of some of our PPAs are also less than the life of the power projects they are tied to. We will need to enter into other offtake agreements, or seek
renewals or extensions of the existing PPAs, for the balance of the life of those power projects. Moreover, there are often other restrictions on our ability to, among
other things, sell power to third parties and undertake expansion initiatives with other consumers. Failure to enter into or renew offtake arrangements in a timely
manner and on terms that are acceptable to us could adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows. There could also be negative accounting
consequences if we are unable to extend or replace expiring PPAs, including writing down the carrying value of assets at such power project sites.
Additionally, under the PPAs, our remedies in case of delays in payment by our customers may also be limited. For example, certain PPAs only permit us to
terminate the PPA on account of non-payment of dues upon 90 days of our inability to recover such dues. Such risks limit our business flexibility, expose us to an
increased risk of unforeseen business and industry changes and could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, most of the government agencies we enter into PPAs with under the NSM or the relevant state policies require us to agree to their standard form
contracts and we cannot negotiate for commercial terms or other terms of funding that are more favorable to us.
Land title in India can be uncertain and we may not be able to identify or correct defects or irregularities in title to the land which we own, lease or intend to
acquire in connection with the development or acquisition of our power projects. Additionally, certain land on which our power projects are located may be
subject to onerous conditions which may adversely affect its use.
There is no central title registry for real property in India and the documentation of land records in India has not been fully computerized. Property records in
India are generally maintained at the state and district level and in local languages, and are updated manually through physical records. Therefore, property records
may not be available online for inspection or updated in a timely manner, may be illegible, untraceable, incomplete or inaccurate in certain respects, or may have
been kept in poor condition, which may impede title investigations or
18
Table of Contents
our ability to rely on such property records. In addition, there may be a discrepancy between the duration of the principal lease under different orders issued by state
governments in respect of a particular parcel of revenue land. Furthermore, title to land in India is often fragmented, and in many cases, land may have multiple
owners. Title may also suffer from irregularities, such as non-execution or non-registration of conveyance deeds and inadequate stamping, and may be subjected to
encumbrances that we are unaware of. Any defects in, or irregularities of, title may result in a loss of development or operating rights over the land, which may
prejudice the success of our power projects and require us to write off substantial expenditures in respect of our power projects.
Further, improperly executed, unregistered or insufficiently stamped conveyance instruments in a property’s chain of title, unregistered encumbrances in
favor of third parties, rights of adverse possessors, ownership claims of family members of prior owners or third parties, or other defects that a purchaser may not
be aware of can affect title to a property. As a result, potential disputes or claims over title to the land on which our power projects are or will be constructed may
arise. However, an adverse decision from a court or the absence of an agreement with such third parties may result in additional costs and delays in the construction
and operating phases of any solar projects situated on such land. Also, such disputes, whether resolved in our favor or not, may divert management’s attention,
harm our reputation or otherwise disrupt our business.
In addition, some properties used for our solar projects are subject to other third-party rights such as right of passage and right to place cables and other
equipment on the properties, which may result in certain interferences with our use of the properties. Our rights to the properties used for our solar projects may be
challenged by property owners and other third parties for various other reasons as well. For example, we do not always have the exclusive right to use a given site.
Any such challenge, if successful, could impair the development or operations of our solar projects on such properties.
Additionally, the power projects that we may develop or acquire in the future may be located on land that may be subject to onerous conditions under the
lease agreements through which we acquire rights to use such land and rights of way. Furthermore, the government may exercise its rights of eminent domain, or
compulsory acquisition in respect of land on which our projects are or will be located. Any of this may adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash
flows in the future.
A certain portion of the land on which our solar projects are or will be located, are not owned by us. In the event we are unable to purchase the land, or enter
into or renew lease agreements, our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Some of our solar projects are located, or will be located, on revenue land that is owned by the state governments or on land acquired or to be acquired from
private parties. The timeline for transfer of title in the land is dependent on the type of land on which the power projects are, or will be, located, and the policies of
the relevant state government in which such land is located. In the case of land acquired from private parties, which is agricultural land, the transfer of such land
from agriculturalists to non-agriculturalists such as us and the use of such land for non-agricultural purposes may require an order from the relevant state land or
revenue authority allowing such transfer or use. For revenue land, we obtain a lease from the relevant government authority.
We cannot assure you that the outstanding approvals would be received, or that lease or sub-lease deeds would be executed in a timely manner, such that the
operation of our solar projects will continue unaffected. In certain cases, any delay in the construction or commissioning of a solar project may result in termination
of the lease. Further, the terms of lease and sub-lease agreements may also not be co-terminus with the lifetime of the power projects, taken together with the period
of time required for construction and commissioning of the project. Accordingly, we will have to obtain extensions of the terms of such leases and sub-leases for
the remainder of the terms of the corresponding PPAs. In the event that the relevant state authorities do not wish to renew the lease or sub-lease agreements, we
may be forced to remove our equipment at the end of the lease and our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
19
Table of Contents
If sufficient demand for solar projects does not develop or takes longer to develop than we anticipate, our business, financial condition, results of operations,
cash flows and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
The solar power market is at a relatively early stage of development in many of the markets that we have entered or intend to enter. This is especially true in
the rooftop and micro-grid solar markets. The solar energy industry continues to experience improved efficiency and higher electricity output. However, trends in
the solar energy industry are based only on limited data and may not be reliable. Many factors may affect the demand for solar projects in India, including:
•
•
•
•
•
fluctuations in economic and market conditions that affect the viability of conventional and non-solar renewable energy sources;
the cost and reliability of solar projects compared to conventional and other renewable energy sources;
the availability of grid capacity to dispatch power generated from solar projects;
public perceptions of the direct and indirect benefits of adopting renewable energy technology; and
regulations and policies governing the electric utility industry that may present technical, regulatory and economic barriers to the purchase and use of
solar energy.
If market demand for solar projects fails to develop sufficiently, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects could be
materially and adversely affected.
If we are unsuccessful in our efforts to establish and/or maintain our compliance with the local content requirements in certain states, our financial results
could be adversely affected.
In some cases, we are required by the central government in national auctions to procure solar panels solely from Indian manufacturers. Certain states or
others may, in the future, require us to procure a defined portion of our solar system components from their designated geographical locales. Such requirements are
commonly referred to as “local content requirements.” In order to satisfy these local content requirements, we may need to undertake localization initiatives in such
geographical locale. Some of our competitors with more significant capital resources may implement or expedite their own localization efforts in these
geographical locale, and those efforts may result in competitive advantages for them. We may be faced with shortages or quality issues if projects we bid on impose
local content requirements. Our costs may also be higher as a result of these requirements. Our failure to successfully implement appropriate localization initiatives,
or otherwise acquire and maintain the capability to satisfy applicable local content requirements, could result in our losing business to our competitors and/or our
breaching the terms of agreements, potentially resulting in damages, including monetary penalties. Depending on the value to us of lost business or the amounts of
any contractual penalties, these consequences could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.
We may incur unexpected expenses if the suppliers of components in our solar projects default in their warranty obligations.
The solar panels, inverters, modules and other system components utilized in our solar projects are generally covered by manufacturers’ warranties, which
are typically for 5 to 25 years. In the event any such components fail to operate as required, we may be able to make a claim against the applicable warranty to
cover all or a portion of the expense or losses associated with the faulty component. However, the warranties may not be sufficient to cover all of our expense and
losses. In addition, these suppliers could cease operations and no longer honor the warranties, which would leave us to cover the expense and losses associated with
the faulty component. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected if we cannot recover the
expense and losses associated with the faulty component from these warranty providers.
20
Table of Contents
Our construction activities may be subject to cost overruns or delays.
Construction of our solar projects may be adversely affected by circumstances outside of our control, including inclement weather, adverse geological and
environmental conditions, a failure to receive regulatory approvals on schedule or third-party delays in providing supplies and other materials. Changes in project
plans or designs, or defective or late execution may increase our costs from our initial estimates and cause delays. Increases in the prices of our materials may
increase procurement costs. Labor shortages, work stoppages or labor disputes could significantly delay a project, increase our costs or cause us to breach our
performance guarantees under our PPAs, particularly because strikes are not considered a force majeure event under many of our PPAs. Moreover, local political
changes and delays, for instance, caused by state and local elections, as well as demonstrations or protests by local communities and special interest groups could
result in, or contribute to, project time and cost overruns for us.
In addition, we sometimes utilize and rely on third-party sub-contractors to construct and install portions of our solar projects. If our sub-contractors do not
satisfy their obligations or do not perform work that meets our quality standards or if there is a shortage of third-party sub-contractors or if there are labor strikes
that interfere with the ability of our employees or contractors to complete their work on time or within budget, we could experience significant delays or cost
overruns.
We may not be able to recover any of these losses in connection with construction cost overruns or delays. Certain PPAs require that we connect to the
transmission grid by a certain date. If the solar project is significantly delayed, such PPAs may be terminated. In addition, if we are unable to meet our performance
guarantees, most of our PPAs require us to pay liquidated damages to the offtaker in proportion to the amount of power not supplied, and also grant the offtaker a
right to draw on bank guarantees posted by us, including up to 100% of certain bank guarantees. Also, certain PPAs provide that we are liable for government fines
and penalties if we fail to deliver electricity required by the offtakers to meet their RPO requirements. Furthermore, in the case of projects with VGF, which is paid
out typically over two to five years, if the project fails to generate power for a long period of time, the government agency can suspend the VGF and demand
repayment of previously paid sums.
Any of the contingencies discussed above could lead us to fail to generate our expected return from our solar projects and result in unanticipated and
significant revenue and earnings losses.
Operation of power generation facilities involves significant risks and hazards that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows. We may not have adequate insurance to cover these risks and hazards.
Power generation involves hazardous activities, including delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. In addition to natural risks such as
earthquake, flood, lightning, hurricane and wind, other hazards, such as fire, structural collapse and machinery failure are inherent risks in our operations. These
and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, plant and equipment and contamination of, or
damage to, the environment and suspension of operations. The occurrence of any one of these events may result in our being named as a defendant in lawsuits
asserting claims for substantial damages, including for environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and property damage and fines and/or penalties. We maintain
an amount of insurance protection that we consider adequate but we cannot provide any assurance that our insurance will be sufficient or effective under all
circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject. Furthermore, our insurance coverage is subject to deductibles, caps, exclusions and
other limitations. A loss for which we are not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows. Further, due to rising insurance costs and changes in the insurance markets, we cannot provide any assurance that our insurance coverage will continue to be
available at all or at rates or on terms similar to those presently available. Any losses not covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
21
Table of Contents
Maintenance and expansion of power generation facilities involve significant risks that could result in reduced power generation and financial results.
Our facilities may require periodic upgrading and improvement. Any unexpected operational or mechanical failure, including failure associated with
breakdowns and forced outages, and any decreased operational or management performance, could reduce our facilities’ generating capacity below expected levels
and reduce our revenues as a result of generating and selling less power. Degradation of the performance of our solar facilities above levels provided for in the
related PPAs may also reduce our revenues. Unanticipated capital expenditures associated with maintaining, upgrading or repairing our facilities may also reduce
profitability, especially because our costs are fixed in the PPAs and we may not pass through any unexpected costs in relation to the projects to our customers.
Furthermore, we are not able to mitigate such project risks by shifting some or all of the risk to a third-party EPC or O&M contractor since we provide these
services in-house.
Changes in technology may require us to make additional capital expenditures to upgrade our facilities. The development and implementation of such
technology entails technical and business risks and significant costs of employee implementation.
The loss of one or more members of our senior management or key employees may adversely affect our ability to implement our strategy.
Our future success depends on the continued services and performances of the members of our management in our business for project implementations,
management and running of our daily operations and the planning and execution of our business strategy. We depend on our experienced management team, and
the loss of one or more key executives could have a negative impact on our business. We also depend on our ability to retain and motivate key employees and
attract qualified new employees. Neither our executive officers nor our key employees are bound by employment agreements for any specific term, and we may be
unable to replace key members of our management team and key employees in the event we lose their services. There is intense competition for experienced
management personnel with technical and industry expertise in the renewable energy business and if we lose the services of any of these individuals and are unable
to find suitable replacements in a timely manner, our ability to realize our strategic objectives could be impaired. Integrating new employees into our management
team could prove disruptive to our operations, require substantial resources and management attention and ultimately prove unsuccessful. An inability to attract and
retain sufficient managerial personnel who have critical industry experience and relationships could limit or delay our strategic efforts, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The generation of electricity from solar sources depends heavily on suitable meteorological conditions. If solar conditions are unfavorable, our electricity
generation, and therefore revenue from our solar projects, may be substantially below our expectations.
The electricity produced and revenues generated by our solar projects are highly dependent on suitable solar conditions and associated weather conditions,
which are beyond our control. Furthermore, components of our systems, such as solar panels and inverters, could be damaged by severe weather, such as
hailstorms, tornadoes or lightning strikes. We generally will be obligated to bear the expense of repairing the damaged solar energy systems that we own, and
replacement and spare parts for key components may be difficult or costly to acquire or may be unavailable. Unfavorable weather and atmospheric conditions could
impair the effectiveness of our assets or reduce their output beneath their rated capacity or require shutdown of key equipment, impeding operation of our solar
assets and our ability to achieve certain performance guarantees pursuant to our PPAs, forecasted revenues and cash flows. Sustained unfavorable weather could
also unexpectedly delay the installation of solar energy systems, which could result in a delay in us acquiring new projects or increase the cost of such projects. We
guarantee the performance of our solar power plants and could suffer monetary consequences if our plants do not produce to our contracted levels.
We base our investment decisions with respect to each solar project on the findings of related solar studies conducted on-site prior to construction. However,
actual climatic conditions at a project site may not conform to
22
Table of Contents
the findings of these studies and therefore, our facilities may not meet anticipated production levels or the rated capacity of our generation assets, which could
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may negatively affect our revenue, cost of sales and gross margins and could result in exchange losses.
As the functional currency of our Indian subsidiaries is the Indian rupee, our operating expenses are denominated primarily in Indian rupees. However, some
of our capital expenditures, and particularly those for equipment imported from international suppliers, such as solar panels, are denominated in foreign currencies.
To the extent that we are unable to match revenue received in our functional currency with costs paid in foreign currencies, exchange rate fluctuations in any such
currency could have an adverse effect on our profitability. Substantially all of our cash flows are generated in Indian rupees and, therefore, significant changes in
the value of the Indian rupee relative to the other foreign currencies could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our ability to meet interest
and principal payments on debts. In addition to currency translation risks, we incur currency transaction risks whenever we or one of our projects enter into a
purchase or sales transaction using a currency other than the Indian rupee. We expect our future capital expenditures in connection with our proposed expansion
plans to include significant expenditures in foreign currencies for imported equipment and machinery.
A significant fluctuation in the Indian rupee and U.S. dollar and other foreign currency exchange rates could therefore have a significant impact on our other
results of operations. The exchange rate between the Indian rupee and these currencies, primarily the U.S. dollar, has fluctuated in the past and any appreciation or
depreciation of the Indian rupee against these currencies can impact our profitability and results of operations. Our results of operations have been impacted by
such fluctuations in the past and may be impacted by such fluctuations in the future. For example, the Indian rupee has depreciated against the U.S. dollar in four of
the last five years, which may impact our results of operations in future periods. Such depreciation impacts the value of your investment. Furthermore, we have
borrowings denominated in U.S. dollars and, as such, an annual decline in the rupee against the U.S. dollar effectively adds to the functional interest rate of our
borrowings. Any amounts we spend in order to hedge the risks to our business due to fluctuations in currencies may not adequately hedge against any losses we
incur due to such fluctuations.
The accounting treatment for many aspects of our solar projects is complex and any changes to the accounting interpretations or accounting rules governing
our solar projects could have a material adverse effect on our U.S. GAAP reported results of operations and financial condition.
The accounting treatment for many aspects of our solar projects is complex, and our future results could be adversely affected by changes in the accounting
treatment applicable to our solar projects. In particular, any changes to the accounting rules regarding the following matters may require us to change the manner in
which we operate and finance our solar projects:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
foreign loans accounting;
derivative contracts;
asset retirement obligations;
share based compensation;
revenue recognition and related timing;
accounting for convertible debt and equity instruments;
income taxes;
foreign holding company tax treatment;
23
Table of Contents
•
•
regulated operations; and
government grants.
Our international corporate structure and operations require us to comply with anti-corruption laws and regulations of the United States government and
various non-U.S. jurisdictions. If we are not in compliance with applicable legal requirements, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties and other
remedial measures.
We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, which prohibits, in relevant part, U.S. nationals, companies that have securities
registered in the U.S. and any officer, director, employee, or agent of such issuer or any shareholder thereof acting on behalf of such issuer from bribing foreign
officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment and imposes obligations to keep accurate books and records
and maintain appropriate internal controls. We have been and will continue to be subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery and anti-facilitation payment legislation in
other jurisdictions, which in certain circumstances go beyond the scope of the FCPA rules and regulations, including in India.
The current and future jurisdictions in which we operate our business may have experienced governmental corruption to some degree, and, in certain
circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery and anti-facilitation payment laws may conflict with local customs and practices, which is likely to negatively
impact our results of operations. We have developed and implemented formal controls and procedures to ensure that we are in compliance with the FCPA as well
as anti-corruption, anti-bribery and anti-facilitation payment laws. However, compliance with these new controls and procedures could make it more difficult for us
to obtain timely permits or otherwise complete our projects on schedule in jurisdictions where strict compliance with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws may
conflict with local customs and practices.
Any historic or future violations of these laws, regulations and procedures by our employees, independent contractors, subcontractors and agents could be
costly and time-consuming to investigate and expose us to administrative, civil or criminal penalties or fines (including under U.S. and Indian laws and regulations
as well as foreign laws). If we were to be investigated for, charged with, or convicted of, violating these laws and regulations, our reputation could be harmed and it
could cause some of our investors to sell their interests in our company to be consistent with their internal investment policies or to avoid reputational damage, and
some investors might forego the purchase of our equity shares, all of which may negatively impact the trading prices of our equity shares. In addition, any
administrative, civil or criminal penalties or fines could have a material adverse effect on our business results of operations and cash flows.
We may become involved in costly and time-consuming litigation and other regulatory proceedings, which require significant attention from our management.
We are not involved in any material litigation, administrative or arbitral proceedings. However, we may, in the ordinary course of our business, become
involved in such proceedings. For example, we are, and may become subject to additional demands from Indian governmental or tax authorities, including, but not
limited to, on account of differing interpretations of central and state tax statutes in India, which are extensive and subject to change from time to time. Changes in
regulations or tax policies, or adoption of differing interpretations of existing provisions, and enforcement thereof by governmental, taxation or judicial authorities
in India may become the subject of legal proceedings involving us from time to time.
Additionally, claims may be brought against or by us from time to time regarding, for example, defective or incomplete work, defective products, personal
injuries or deaths, damage to or destruction of property, breach of warranty, late completion of work, delayed payments, intellectual property rights or regulatory
compliance, and may subject us to litigation, arbitration and other legal proceedings, which may be expensive, lengthy, disruptive to normal business operations
and require significant attention from our management.
If we were found to be liable on any of the claims against us, we would incur a charge against earnings to the extent a reserve had not been established for
coverage. If amounts ultimately realized from the claims by us
24
Table of Contents
were materially lower than the balances included in our financial statements, we would incur a charge against earnings to the extent profit had already been
accrued. Charges and write-downs associated with such legal proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flow. Moreover, legal proceedings, particularly those resulting in judgments or findings against us, may harm our reputation and competitiveness in the
market.
Employee shortages and rising employee costs may harm our business and increase our operation costs.
As of March 31, 2017, we employed 401 persons to perform a variety of functions in our daily operations. The low cost workforce in India provides us with
a cost advantage. However, we have observed an overall tightening of the employee market and an emerging trend of shortage of skilled labor. Failure to obtain
stable and dedicated employee support may cause disruption to our business that harms our operations. Furthermore, employee costs have increased in India in
recent years and may continue to increase in the near future. To remain competitive, we may need to increase the salaries of our employees to attract and retain
them. Our employee payroll and related costs amounted to US$5.1 million, and US$7.8 million in fiscal years 2016 and 2017, respectively. Any increase in
employee costs may harm our operating results, cash flows and financial condition.
The results of the United Kingdom’s referendum on withdrawal from the European Union may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial
markets and our business.
In June 2016, a majority of voters in the United Kingdom elected to withdraw from the European Union in a national referendum. The referendum was
advisory, and the terms of any withdrawal are subject to a negotiation period that could last at least two years after the government of the United Kingdom formally
initiates a withdrawal process. Nevertheless, the referendum has created significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the
European Union, including with respect to the laws and regulations that will apply as the United Kingdom determines which European Union laws to replace or
replicate in the event of a withdrawal. The referendum has also given rise to calls for the governments of other European Union member states to consider
withdrawal. These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on global economic
conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global market liquidity and restrict the ability of key market participants to
operate in certain financial markets. Any of these factors could depress economic activity and restrict our access to capital, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and reduce the price of our equity shares.
Risks Related to Operations in India
Substantially all of our business and operations are located in India and we are subject to regulatory, economic, social and political uncertainties in India.
Substantially all of our business and employees are located in India, and we intend to continue to develop and expand our business in India. Consequently,
our financial performance and the market price of our equity shares will be affected by changes in exchange rates and controls, interest rates, changes in
government policies, including taxation policies, social and civil unrest and other political, social and economic developments in or affecting India.
An election or a new administration could result in uncertainty in the solar market, which could harm our operations. For example, we saw a slowdown in the
solar market in fiscal year 2014 as a result of it leading up to an election year with uncertainty about the level of government support for solar initiatives going
forward.
The Indian government has exercised and continues to exercise significant influence over many aspects of the Indian economy. Since 1991, successive
Indian governments have generally pursued policies of economic liberalization and financial sector reforms, including by significantly relaxing restrictions on the
private sector. Nevertheless, the role of the Indian central and state governments in the Indian economy as producers, consumers
25
Table of Contents
and regulators has remained significant and we cannot assure you that such liberalization policies will continue. The rate of economic liberalization could change,
and specific laws and policies affecting solar power producers, foreign investments, currency exchange rates and other matters affecting investments in India could
change as well, including exposure to possible expropriation, nationalization or other governmental actions.
Further, protests against privatizations and government corruption scandals, which have occurred in the past, could slow the pace of liberalization and
deregulation. A significant change in India’s policy of economic liberalization and deregulation or any social or political uncertainties could significantly harm
business and economic conditions in India generally and our business and prospects.
The extent and reliability of Indian infrastructure could significantly harm our results of operations, cash flows and financial conditions.
India’s physical infrastructure is less developed than that of many developed nations. Any congestion or disruption with respect to communication systems
or any public facility, including transportation infrastructure, could disrupt our normal business activity. Any deterioration of India’s physical infrastructure would
harm the national economy, disrupt the transportation of people, goods and supplies, and add costs to doing business in India. These disruptions could interrupt our
business operations and significantly harm our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. For the risk of congestion or disruption with respect to
India’s electricity grid and transmission lines, see “Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors — Risks Related to Us and Our Industry — Any constraints in the
availability of the electricity grid, including our inability to obtain access to transmission lines in a timely and cost-efficient manner, could adversely affect our
business, results of operations and cash flows.”
A slowdown in economic growth in India could cause our business to suffer.
Since inception, all of our revenue has been derived directly from sales by AZI and its various other subsidiaries in India. In addition, the CIA World
Factbook estimates that consumer inflation in India was approximately 5.6% in 2016. The performance and growth of our business are necessarily dependent on
economic conditions prevalent in India, which may be significantly harmed by political instability or regional conflicts, a general rise in interest rates, inflation and
economic slowdown elsewhere in the world or otherwise. The Indian economy also remains largely driven by the performance of the agriculture sector which
depends on the quality of monsoon, which is difficult to predict. Although the Indian economy has continued to grow in the past few years, any future slowdown in
the Indian economy or a further increase in inflation could have a material adverse effect on the demand for power and, as a result, on our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
India’s trade relationships with other countries and its trade deficit may significantly harm Indian economic conditions. If trade deficits increase or are no
longer manageable because of an unexpected rise in global crude oil prices or otherwise, the Indian economy, and therefore our business, our financial performance
and the price of our equity shares could be significantly harmed.
India also faces major challenges in sustaining its growth, which include the need for substantial infrastructure development and improving access to
healthcare and education. If India’s economic growth cannot be sustained or otherwise slows down significantly, our business and prospects could be significantly
harmed.
Stringent labor laws may harm our ability to have flexible human resource policies and labor union problems could negatively affect our processing capacity,
construction schedules, cash flows and overall profitability.
India has stringent labor legislation that protects the interests of workers, including legislation that sets forth detailed procedures for dispute resolution and
employee removal, imposes financial obligations on employers upon employee layoffs and regulates contract labor. These laws may restrict our ability to have
human resource policies that would allow us to react swiftly to the needs of our business, discharge employees or downsize. We
26
Table of Contents
may also experience labor unrest in the future, which may delay our construction schedules or disrupt our operations. If such delays or disruptions occur or
continue for a prolonged period of time, our processing capacity and overall profitability could be negatively affected. We also depend on third party contract labor.
It is possible under Indian law that we may be held responsible for wage payments to these laborers if their contractors default on payment. We may be held liable
for any non-payment by contractors and any such order or direction from a court or any other regulatory authority may harm our business, results of our operations
and cash flows.
Foreign investment laws in India include certain restrictions, which may affect our future acquisitions or investments in India.
India regulates ownership of Indian companies by non-residents, although some restrictions on foreign investment have been relaxed in recent years. Under
current Indian regulations, transfers of shares between non-residents and residents are permitted (subject to certain exceptions) if they comply with, among other
things, the guidelines specified by the Reserve Bank of India in relation to pricing and valuation of such shares and certain reporting requirements for such
transactions specified by the Reserve Bank of India. If the transfer of shares is not in compliance with such pricing guidelines or reporting requirements, or falls
under any of the exceptions specified by the Reserve Bank of India, the prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India will be required before any such transfer may
be consummated. We may not be able to obtain any required approval from the Reserve Bank of India or any other Indian regulatory authority on any particular
terms or at all.
For example, under its consolidated foreign direct investment policy, the Indian government has set out additional requirements for foreign investments in
India, including requirements with respect to downstream investments by Indian companies owned or controlled by non-resident entities and the transfer of
ownership or control, from resident Indian persons or entities to non-residents, of Indian companies in sectors with limits on foreign investment. As substantially all
of AZI’s equity shares are directly held by Azure Power Global Limited, it would be considered an entity owned and controlled by non-residents under applicable
Indian laws. Accordingly, any downstream investment by Azure Power Global Limited into another Indian company will have to be in compliance with conditions
applicable to such Indian entity, in accordance with the consolidated foreign direct investment policy. There are guidelines in relation to pricing and valuation of
shares and restrictions on sources of funding for such investments. While these guidelines currently do not materially limit our planned investments in our Indian
subsidiaries, to the extent they become more restrictive, they may restrict our ability to make further equity investments in India, including through Azure Power
Global Limited.
Further, India’s Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder prohibit us from borrowing
from our Indian subsidiaries. We are permitted to lend to our Indian subsidiaries subject to compliance with India’s policy on external commercial borrowings as
notified by the Reserve Bank of India from time to time, which specifies certain conditions, including in relation to eligible lenders and borrowers, permitted end
use and limits on the all-in-cost.
Changing laws, rules and regulations and legal uncertainties, including adverse application of corporate and tax laws, may adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.
The regulatory and policy environment in which we operate is evolving and subject to change. Such changes, including the instances mentioned below, may
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects, to the extent that we are unable to suitably respond to and comply
with any such changes in applicable law and policy.
•
•
The General Anti Avoidance Rules have come into effect on April 1, 2017. The intent of this legislation is to prevent business arrangements set up
with the intent to avoid tax incidence under the IT Act. In the absence of any precedents on the subject, the application of these provisions is uncertain.
The Government of India has issued revised Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (“ICDS”) that will be applied in computing taxable
income and payment of income taxes thereon, applicable with
27
Table of Contents
effect from the assessment period for the Fiscal Year 2017. ICDS shall apply to all taxpayers following an accrual system of accounting for the
purpose of computation of income under the heads of “profits and gains of business or profession” and “income from other sources”. Such specific
standards for computation of income taxes in India are relatively new, and the impact of the ICDS on our results of operations and financial condition
is uncertain.
•
The Indian Parliament has recently approved the adoption of a comprehensive national goods and services tax (“GST”), regime that will combine taxes
and levies by the central and state governments into a unified rate structure. It is not clear, however, how the GST will be applied and implemented,
and there can be no assurance that the GST will not result in significant additional taxes being payable, which in turn, may harm our results of
operations and financial condition.
•
The Government of India has also amended its rules which determine the ‘tax residency’ of a company in India with effect from April 1, 2017.
Previously, a foreign company could be a tax resident of India only if its control and management was situated wholly in India. Under the amended
rules, a company will be treated as tax resident of India if (i) it is an Indian company; or (ii) its place of effective management (“POEM”) is in India.
POEM is defined in the Income Tax Act, 1961, to mean a place where key management and commercial decisions that are necessary for the conduct
of the business of an entity as a whole are, in substance, made. The Government of India has also issued the final guidelines for determining the
POEM of a company on January 24, 2017. The applicability of the amended rules and the treatment of our subsidiaries under such rules is uncertain.
We have not determined the impact of these recent and proposed legislations on our business. Uncertainty in the applicability, interpretation or
implementation of any amendment to, or change in, governing law, regulation or policy in the jurisdictions in which we operate, including by reason of an absence,
or a limited body, of administrative or judicial precedent may be time consuming as well as costly for us to resolve and may impact the viability of our current
business or restrict our ability to grow our business in the future.
Natural calamities could have a negative impact on the Indian economy and adversely affect our business and project operations.
India has experienced natural calamities such as earthquakes, tsunamis, floods and drought in the past few years. In December 2004, Southeast Asia,
including both the eastern and western coasts of India, experienced a massive tsunami, and in October 2005, the State of Jammu and Kashmir experienced an
earthquake, both of which events caused significant loss of life and property damage. In June 2013, the state of Uttarakhand in northern India experienced
widespread floods and landslides. Similarly, in December 2016, Cyclonic storm, Vardah resulted in heavy rains over Chennai and adjoining areas. As a result of
which, many parts of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh witnessed massive damage. The extent and severity of these natural disasters determines their impact on the
Indian economy. If climatic conditions or natural disasters occur in areas where our solar projects and project teams are located, project development, connectivity
to the power grid and the provision of O&M services may be adversely affected. In particular, materials may not be delivered as scheduled and labor may not be
available. Substantially all of our operations and employees are located in India and there can be no assurance that we will not be adversely affected by natural
disasters in the future.
In recent years, certain regions of the world, including India, have experienced outbreaks of swine flu caused by the H1N1 virus. Any future outbreak of
swine flu or other health epidemics, such as the outbreak of the Ebola virus, may restrict the level of business activity in affected areas which could adversely affect
our business.
28
Table of Contents
Terrorist acts and other acts of violence involving India or other neighboring countries could significantly harm our operations directly, or may result in a
more general loss of customer confidence and reduced investment in these countries that causes significant harm to our business, results of operations, cash
flows and financial condition.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war involving India or other neighboring countries may significantly harm the Indian markets and the
worldwide financial markets. The occurrence of any of these events may result in a loss of business confidence, which could potentially lead to economic recession
and generally cause significant harm to our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. In addition, any deterioration in international
relations may result in investor concern regarding regional stability, which could decrease the price of our equity shares.
South Asia has also experienced instances of civil unrest and hostilities among neighboring countries from time to time. There have also been incidents in
and near India such as terrorist attacks in Mumbai, Delhi and on the Indian Parliament, troop mobilizations along the India and Pakistan border and an aggravated
geopolitical situation in the region. Such military activity or terrorist attacks in the future could significantly harm the Indian economy by disrupting
communications and making travel more difficult. Resulting political tensions could create a greater perception that investments in Indian companies involve a high
degree of risk. Furthermore, if India were to become engaged in armed hostilities, particularly hostilities that were protracted or involved the threat or use of
nuclear weapons, we might not be able to continue our operations. Our insurance policies for a certain part of our business do not cover terrorist attacks or business
interruptions from terrorist attacks or for other reasons.
Risks Related to Investments in Mauritian Companies
As our shareholder, you may have greater difficulties in protecting your interests than as a shareholder of a United States corporation.
We are incorporated under the laws of Mauritius. The laws generally applicable to United States corporations and their shareholders may provide
shareholders of United States corporations with rights and protection for which there may be no corresponding or similar provisions under the Companies Act 2001
of Mauritius, as amended, or the Mauritius Companies Act. As such, being shareholder of our equity shares, you may or may not be accorded the same level of
shareholder rights and protection that a shareholder of a United States corporation may be accorded under the laws generally applicable to United States
corporations and their shareholders. Taken together with the provisions of our constitution, which we adopted with effect upon completion of our public offering in
October 2016, or Constitution, some of these differences may result in your having greater difficulties in protecting your interests as our shareholder than you
would have as a shareholder of a United States corporation. This affects, among other things, the circumstances under which transactions involving an interested
director are voidable, whether an interested director can be held accountable for any benefit realized in a transaction with us, what rights you may have as a
shareholder to enforce specified provisions of the Mauritius Companies Act or our Constitution, and the circumstances under which we may indemnify our
directors and officers.
We may become subject to unanticipated tax liabilities that may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are a Mauritius Category 1 Global Business Company, or GBC1, and are tax resident in Mauritius. The Income Tax Act 1995 of Mauritius imposes a tax
in Mauritius on the chargeable income of our company at the rate of 15%. However, under the Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996 of Mauritius,
subject to the Income Tax Act 1995 and the regulations under the Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996, credit is allowed for foreign tax on the
foreign source income of a resident of Mauritius against Mauritius tax computed by reference to the same income, and where credit is allowed against Mauritius tax
chargeable in respect of any income, the amount of Mauritius tax so chargeable shall be reduced by the amount of the credit. Under the
29
Table of Contents
Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996, “foreign source income” means income which is not derived from Mauritius and includes in the case of a
corporation holding a GBC1 license, under the Financial Services Act 2007 of Mauritius, income derived in the course of a global business. Subject to the
provisions of the Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996, no credit is allowed in respect of foreign tax unless written evidence is presented to the
Mauritius Revenue Authority showing the amount of foreign tax which has been charged and for this purpose, “written evidence” includes a receipt of the relevant
authorities of the foreign country for the foreign tax or any other evidence that the foreign tax has been deducted or paid to the relevant authorities of that country.
However, pursuant to Regulation 8 of the Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996, if written evidence is not presented to the Mauritius Revenue
Authority showing the amount of foreign tax charged on our company’s foreign source income, the amount of foreign tax shall nevertheless be conclusively
presumed to be equal to 80% of the Mauritius tax chargeable with respect to that income and in such circumstance, the effective tax rate in Mauritius on our
company’s chargeable income would be 3%.
Following amendments to the Financial Services Act 2007 of Mauritius pursuant to the Finance (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2010 in December 2010,
Mauritius companies holding a GBC1 issued by the Financial Services Commission in Mauritius are permitted to conduct business both in and outside Mauritius
(instead of outside Mauritius only). The operations of a GBC1 company in Mauritius will be subject to tax on chargeable income at the rate of 15% in Mauritius.
We hold tax residence certificates issued by the Mauritius Revenue Authority. We believe that a significant portion of the income derived from our
operations will not be subject to tax in countries in which we conduct activities or in which our customers are located, other than Mauritius and India. However,
this belief is based on the anticipated nature and conduct of our business, which may change. It is also based on our understanding of our position under the tax
laws of the countries in which we have assets or conduct activities. This position is subject to review and possible challenge by taxing authorities and to possible
changes in law that may have retroactive effect. Our results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected if we become subject to a
significant amount of unanticipated tax liabilities.
Anti-takeover provisions in our constitutional documents and under Mauritius law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our
shareholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our shareholders to replace or remove our current management and limit the market price of our
equity shares.
Provisions in our Constitution may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or changes in our management. Our Constitution includes
the following provisions which may be regarded as defensive measures:
•
•
•
•
•
a staggered Board of Directors;
the ability to issue additional equity shares (including “blank check” preferred stock);
granting directors, the absolute discretion to decline to register a transfer of any shares;
requiring that amendments to our Constitution be approved by a special resolution of the shareholders of our company; and
limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers.
These provisions may restrict or prevent any attempts by our shareholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for
shareholders to replace members of our Board of Directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management team. The provisions could also
deprive our shareholders of the opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over the prevailing market price by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain
control of our company in a tender offer or similar transactions.
30
Table of Contents
Risks Related to Our Equity Shares
An Active or Liquid Trading Market for Our Equity Shares May Not Be Maintained.
An active, liquid trading market for our equity shares may not be maintained in the long term and we cannot be certain that any trading market for our equity
shares will be sustained or that the present price will correspond to the future price at which our equity shares will trade. Loss of liquidity could increase the price
volatility of our equity shares.
Any additional issuance of equity shares or other equity-related securities would dilute the positions of existing investors in the equity shares and could
adversely affect the market price of our equity shares. We cannot assure you that our equity shares will not decline below their prevailing market price. You may be
unable to sell your equity shares at a price that is attractive to you.
The market price of our equity shares has been and may continue to be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
The trading price of our equity shares has been volatile since our initial public offering, and is likely to continue to be volatile. Factors that could cause
fluctuations in the market price of our equity shares include —trading volume, prices of other securities, market trends, growth of other comparable companies,
changes in operating performance, sale of additional shares in the market by us or by other investors, coverage by security analysts, changes in financial estimates,
failure to meet analyst or market expectations, press releases by us or our competitors, market speculations, changes in tax and other incentives, regulatory and
policy changes, litigations, business acquisitions, changes in accounting standards and economic conditions.
Further, in recent years the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices
of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. In
addition, the stock prices of many renewable energy companies have experienced wide fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of
those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions, government
shutdowns, interest rate changes, or international currency fluctuations, may cause the market price of our equity shares to decline.
Sales of a substantial number of our equity shares in the public market, including by our existing stockholders, could cause our stock price to fall.
Sales of a substantial number of our equity shares in the public market, or the perception that the sales might occur, could depress the market price of our
equity shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We are unable to predict the effect that these sales and
others may have on the prevailing market price of our equity shares.
In addition, certain of our stockholders can require us to register shares of our capital stock owned by them for public sale in the United States. We have also
filed a registration statement to register our equity shares reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans. Subject to the satisfaction of applicable
exercise periods and applicable volume and restrictions that apply to affiliates, our equity shares issued upon exercise of outstanding options will become available
for immediate resale in the public market upon issuance.
Future sales of our equity shares may make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.
These sales also could cause the market price of our equity shares to decline and make it more difficult for you to sell our equity shares.
31
Table of Contents
You may have difficulty enforcing judgments against us, our directors and management.
We are incorporated under the laws of Mauritius. Further, we conduct substantially all of our operations in India through our key operating subsidiary in
India. The majority of our directors and officers reside outside the United States, and a majority of our assets and some or all of the assets of such persons are
located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible to effect service of process within the United States upon us or those persons, or to
recover against us or them on judgments of United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal
securities laws. An award of punitive damages under a United States court judgment based upon United States federal securities laws is likely to be construed by
Mauritian and Indian courts to be penal in nature and therefore unenforceable in both Mauritius and India. Further, no claim may be brought in Mauritius or India
against us or our directors and officers in the first instance for violation of United States federal securities laws because these laws have no extraterritorial
application under Mauritian or Indian law and do not have force of law in Mauritius or India. However, a Mauritian or Indian court may impose civil liability,
including the possibility of monetary damages, on us or our directors and officers if the facts alleged in a complaint constitute or give rise to a cause of action under
Mauritian or Indian law. Moreover, it is unlikely that a court in Mauritius or India would award damages on the same basis as a foreign court if an action were
brought in Mauritius or India or that a Mauritian or Indian court would enforce foreign judgments if it viewed the amount of damages as excessive or inconsistent
with Mauritius or Indian practice or public policy.
The courts of Mauritius or India would not automatically enforce judgments of United States courts obtained in actions against us or our directors and
officers, predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws, or entertain actions brought in Mauritius or India against us or
such persons predicated solely upon United States federal securities laws. Further, there is no treaty in effect between the United States and Mauritius providing for
the enforcement of judgments of United States courts in civil and commercial matters and the United States has not been declared by the Indian government to be a
reciprocating territory for the purposes of enforcement of foreign judgments, and there are grounds upon which Mauritian or Indian courts may decline to enforce
the judgments of United States courts. Some remedies available under the laws of United States jurisdictions, including remedies available under the United States
federal securities laws, may not be allowed in Mauritian or Indian courts if contrary to public policy in Mauritius or India. Because judgments of United States
courts are not automatically enforceable in Mauritius or India, it may be difficult for you to recover against us or our directors and officers based upon such
judgments. In India, prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India is required in order to repatriate any amount recovered pursuant to such judgments.
We do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our equity shares.
We have not paid dividends on any of our equity shares to date and we currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and
growth of our business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our equity shares are likely to be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
Consequently, you will likely only experience a gain from your investment in our equity shares if the price of our equity shares increases.
In addition, our ability and decisions whether to pay dividends in the future will depend on our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements.
Dividends to U.S. holders may be negatively affected by foreign currency fluctuations. We may not generate sufficient income to cover our operating expenses and
pay dividends to our shareholders, or at all. Our ability to pay dividends also could be restricted under financing arrangements that we may enter into in the future
and we may be required to obtain the approval of lenders in the event we are in default of our repayment obligations. We may be unable to pay dividends in the
near or medium term, and our future dividend policy will depend on our capital requirements, financing arrangements, results of operations and financial condition.
Dividends distributed by us will attract dividend distribution tax at rates applicable from time to time.
32
Table of Contents
Our holding company will have to rely principally on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our operating subsidiaries and limitations on their
ability to pay dividends to us could adversely impact your ability to receive dividends on our equity shares.
Since we cannot borrow from our Indian subsidiaries, dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our operating subsidiaries will be our principal
source for cash in order for us to fund our operations including corporate expenses. Accordingly, we may need to issue additional equity or borrow funds, either of
which may be unavailable on attractive terms, if at all.
If our operating subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or
make other distributions to our holding company. As our key operating subsidiary is established in India, it is also subject to certain limitations with respect to
dividend payments. As of the date of this annual report, AZI has not paid any cash dividends on its equity shares and does not intend to pay dividends to its equity
shareholders, including Azure Power Global Limited, in the foreseeable future. Moreover, as we do not own 100% of AZI, any dividend payment made by AZI to
us will also involve a payment to the other shareholders of AZI, including the Founders.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to, and we will, follow certain home country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain requirements
applicable to U.S. issuers. This may afford less protection to holders of our equity shares.
As a foreign private issuer listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance
practices in lieu of certain NYSE requirements. A foreign private issuer must disclose in its annual reports filed with the SEC, each NYSE requirement with which
it does not comply followed by a description of its applicable home country practice. As a company incorporated in Mauritius and which is listed on the NYSE, we
may follow our home country practice with respect to the composition of our Board of Directors and executive sessions. Unlike the requirements of the NYSE, the
corporate governance practice and requirements in Mauritius do not require us as a GBC1 to have the majority of our Board of Directors be independent or to hold
regular executive sessions where only independent directors shall be present. Such Mauritian home country practices may afford less protection to holders of our
equity shares than would be available to the shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
If we cease to qualify as a foreign private issuer, we would be required to comply fully with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S.
domestic issuers, and we would incur significant additional legal, accounting and other expenses that we would not incur as a foreign private issuer.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from a number of rules and regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act,
applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including the furnishing and content of proxy statements, compliance with the reporting and short-swing profit recovery
provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act applicable to executive officers, directors and principal shareholders. We are required under the Exchange
Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. domestic issuers, and we are not required to disclose in our
periodic reports all of the information that U.S. domestic issuers are required to disclose. If we do not qualify as a foreign private issuer, we will be required to
comply fully with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, and we will incur significant additional legal, accounting and
other expenses that we would not incur as a foreign private issuer.
For as long as we are an “emerging growth company,” we will not be required to comply with certain reporting requirements that apply to other public
companies.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, enacted on April 5, 2012. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth
company, we may choose to take advantage of certain exemptions from
33
Table of Contents
reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These include: (1) not being required to comply with the
auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (2) not being required to comply with any new requirements adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB, requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would
be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the issuer, (3) not being required to comply with any new audit rules
adopted by the PCAOB after April 5, 2012 unless the SEC determines otherwise, and (4) not being required to provide certain disclosure regarding executive
compensation required of larger public companies. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years from the end of fiscal year 2017, although, if the
market value of our equity shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds US$700 million as of any September 30 before the end of that five-year period, we would
cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following April 1. We cannot predict if investors will find our equity shares less attractive if we choose to rely
on these exemptions. If some investors find our equity shares less attractive as a result of any choices to reduce future disclosure, there may be a less active trading
market for our equity shares and our share price may be more volatile. Further, as a result of these scaled regulatory requirements, our disclosure may be more
limited than that of other public companies and you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of such companies.
You may be subject to Indian taxes on income arising through the sale of our equity shares.
Pursuant to recent amendments to the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended, income arising directly or indirectly through the sale of a capital asset,
including any share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside of India, will be liable to tax in India, if such share or interest derives,
directly or indirectly, its value substantially from assets (whether tangible or intangible) located in India and whether or not the seller of such share or interest has a
residence, place of business, business connection, or any other presence in India. The share or interest of the company or entity registered or incorporated outside of
India is deemed to derive its value substantially from the assets located in India if the value of such Indian assets exceeds INR 100 million and represents at least
50% of the value of all the assets owned by the company or entity registered or incorporated outside of India. Substantially all of our assets are located in India.
However, if the transferor of share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside of India (along with its associated enterprises), neither
holds the right of management or control in the company or entity registered or incorporated outside of India nor holds voting power or share capital or interest
exceeding 5% of the total voting power or total share capital or interest in the company or entity registered or incorporated outside of India, at any time during the
twelve months preceding the date of transfer, such small shareholders are exempt from the indirect transfer provisions mentioned above. The amendments also do
not deal with the interplay between the amendments to the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended, and the existing Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements
that India has entered into with countries such as the United States in case of an indirect transfer. Accordingly, the implications of the recent amendments are
presently unclear. If it is determined that these amendments apply to a holder of our equity shares, such holder could be liable to pay taxes in India on such income.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they change their
recommendations regarding our equity shares adversely, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our equity shares is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us, our business, our
market or our competitors. If any of the analysts who cover us or may cover us in the future change their recommendation regarding our stock adversely, or provide
more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, our stock price would likely decline. If any analyst who covers us or may cover us in the future
were to cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our
stock price or trading volume to decline.
34
Table of Contents
Future issuances of any equity securities may cause a dilution in your shareholding, decrease the trading price of our equity shares, and restrictions agreed to
as part of debt financing arrangements may place restrictions on our operations.
Any issuance of equity securities after our initial offering could dilute the interests of our shareholders and could substantially decrease the trading price of
our equity shares. We may issue equity or equity-linked securities in the future for a number of reasons, including to finance our operations and business strategy
(including in connection with acquisitions and other transactions), to adjust our ratio of debt to equity, to satisfy our obligations upon the exercise of then-
outstanding options or other equity-linked securities, if any, or for other reasons. Issuance of such additional securities may significantly dilute the equity interests
of investors, since initial offering who will not have pre-emptive rights with respect to such an issuance, subordinate the rights of holders of equity shares if
preferred shares are issued with rights senior to those afforded to our equity shares, or harm prevailing market prices for our equity shares.
We may not be able to successfully complete acquisitions or enhance post-acquisition performances.
In addition to our organic growth, we intend to continue to accelerate our business growth through strategic acquisitions when suitable opportunities arise.
However, our ability to consummate acquisitions is subject to various risks and uncertainties, including:
•
•
•
•
failure to identify suitable acquisition targets and reach agreement on commercially reasonable terms;
failure to obtain sufficient financing on acceptable terms to fund the proposed acquisitions;
failure to obtain regulatory approvals and third-party consents necessary to consummate the proposed acquisitions; and
other companies, many of which may have greater financial, marketing and sales resources, may compete with us for the right to acquire such product
candidates, products or businesses.
Even if we are able to consummate acquisitions, our ability to grow our business through such acquisitions remains subject to further risks and uncertainties
which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, including that:
•
•
•
•
•
we are unable to integrate the acquired businesses with our existing business and operations;
the acquired businesses do not provide us with the resources we had anticipated;
the acquired businesses are subject to unforeseen or hidden liabilities;
we are unable to effectively manage our enlarged business operations or manage the acquired businesses that may operate in new markets or
geographic regions; and
the acquired businesses do not generate the revenue and profitability we had anticipated.
Furthermore, the process of pursuing and consummating acquisitions and integrating and managing acquired businesses, whether or not successful, could
divert our resources and management attention from our existing business and disrupt our operations.
We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to certain U.S. investors of
our equity shares.
A non-U.S. corporation will be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for any taxable year if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income for such
year is passive income or (2) at least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year is attributable to
assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. We do not expect to be a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our
current taxable year or future taxable years. However, our PFIC status is a
35
Table of Contents
factual determination made after the close of each taxable year that will depend, in part, on the composition of our income and assets, and thus, there can be no
assurance that we will not be treated as a PFIC in our current taxable year or future taxable years. See “Item 10. Additional Information — E. Taxation — U.S.
Federal Income Taxation — Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A. History and Development of the Company
Our legal and commercial name is Azure Power Global Limited. We are a public company limited by shares incorporated in Mauritius on January 30, 2015.
Our registered office is located at c/o AAA Global Services Ltd., 1st Floor, The Exchange 18 Cybercity, Ebene, Mauritius. Our principal executive offices are
located at 8 Local Shopping Complex, Pushp Vihar, Madangir, New Delhi 110062, India, and our telephone number at this location is (91-11) 49409800. Our
principal website address is www.azurepower.com. Our agent for service of process in the United States is CT Corporation System, located at 111 Eighth Avenue,
13th Floor, New York, NY 10011.
Founded by Inderpreet Wadhwa in 2008, we developed India’s first utility scale solar project in 2009. As of March 31, 2017, we operated 32 utility scale
projects and several commercial rooftop projects with a combined rated capacity of 651 MW which represents a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR,
of 107%, since March 2012. As of such date we were also constructing eight projects with a combined rated capacity of 354 MW and had an additional 64 MW
committed, bringing our total portfolio capacity to 1,069 MW. Megawatts committed represents the aggregate megawatt rated capacity of solar power plants
pursuant to customer power purchase agreements, or PPAs, signed or allotted but not yet commissioned and operational as of the reporting date.
The initial offering by the Company and the private placement resulted in aggregate gross proceeds before expense of US$115.4 million and incurred an
underwriters commission and other expenses of US$14.4 million. Our equity shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AZRE.”
B. Business Overview
Our mission is to be the lowest-cost power producer in the world. We sell solar power in India on long-term fixed price contracts to our customers, at prices
which in many cases are at or below prevailing alternatives for these customers. We are also developing micro-grid applications for the highly fragmented and
underserved electricity market in India. Since inception, we have achieved an 83% reduction in total solar project cost, which includes a significant decrease in
balance of systems costs due in part to our value engineering, design and procurement efforts.
Indian solar capacity installed reached 12.2 GW at the end of March 2017 with a target to achieve 100GW of installed solar capacity by 2022. Solar power is
a cleaner, faster-to-build and cost-effective alternative energy solution to coal and diesel based power, the economic and climate costs of which continue to increase
every year.
We developed India’s first utility scale solar project in 2009. As of March 31, 2017, we operated 32 utility scale projects and several commercial rooftop
projects with a combined rated capacity of 651 MW which represents a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 107%, since March 2012. As of such date we
were also constructing eight projects with a combined rated capacity of 354 MW and had an additional 64 MW committed, bringing our total portfolio capacity to
1,069 MW. Megawatts committed represents the aggregate megawatt rated capacity of solar power plants pursuant to customer power purchase agreements, or
PPAs, signed or allotted but not yet commissioned and operational as of the reporting date.
Our longer term goals are to achieve 5GW by December 31, 2020. Our ability to achieve these goals will depend on, among other things, our ability to
acquire the required land for the new capacity (on lease or direct purchase,) raising adequate project financing and working capital, the growth of the Indian power
market in line with current government targets, our ability to maintain our market share of India’s installed capacity as competition increases, the need to further
strengthen our operations team to execute the increased capacity, and
36
Table of Contents
the need to further strengthen our systems and processes to manage the ensuing growth opportunities, as well as the other risks and challenges discussed under the
caption “Item. 3 Key Information — D. Risk Factors.”
Utility scale solar projects are typically awarded through government auctions. We believe the strong demand for our solar power is a result of the following:
•
•
•
•
•
Low levelized cost of energy . Our in-house engineering, procurement and construction, or EPC, expertise, purely solar focus, advanced in-house
operations and maintenance, or O&M, capability and efficient financial strategy allow us to offer low-cost solar power solutions.
Strong value proposition for our customers . We manage the entire development and operation process, providing customers with long term fixed
price PPAs in addition to high levels of availability and service. This helps us win repeat business.
Our integrated profile supports growth . Our integrated profile affords us greater control over project development, construction and operation,
which provides us with greater insight and certainty on our construction costs and timeline.
Strong community partnerships . Our ability to build long term community relationships allows us to improve our time of completion, further
reducing project development risk.
We take a leading role in policy initiatives . We provided input to the government to help it design an auction process supporting multiple winners at
differentiated price points and implementing a transparent bidding process open to all participants. For example, we suggested that the government
include compulsorily convertible debentures in the calculation of a bidder’s net worth for the purposes of tender qualification, which was ultimately
adopted by the government.
We generate revenue from a mix of leading government utilities and commercial entities. Because we have our own EPC and O&M capabilities, we retain
the profit margins associated with those services that other project developers may need to pay to third-party providers.
Market Opportunity
India’s economic growth is intrinsically linked to the increasing consumption of energy and natural resources. Energy demand has outpaced capacity
additions in recent years, which has resulted in persistent peak power deficits in the country. In addition, the Indian government has made it a priority to provide
electricity to the estimated 304 million people who are without this service.
Solar is an attractive option to help address this energy gap driven by regional fundamentals and regulatory support by the Indian government. The Indian
government increased its 2022 target for solar capacity from 20GW to 100GW, ratified Paris climate change agreement and committed to 40% renewables by 2030
up from 15%. During fiscal year 2017, 49% of total renewable installations were solar and solar has clearly outpaced all other renewables sources. The Central
Government, in collaboration with the state governments, is planning to facilitate the development of 50 solar power parks of 500 MW and above to boost the solar
capacity in high solar irradiation states and 20GW of new projects are to be auctioned by 2018. As per MNRE, India installed 12,289 MW of solar through March
2017. The state governments will identify land for the proposed solar parks, provide permits and related infrastructure such as grid interconnect systems while a
government sponsored entity will commit to buy power produced from these parks.
The following trends have made solar a large, rapidly growing market opportunity:
•
Peak power deficits and rising power prices . Despite adding 112 GW of power in the past five years, India continues to be plagued by a persistent
demand/supply mismatch with a six-year average energy deficit of approximately 5% according to the Ministry of Power. As the country has
outstripped its domestic supply of conventional fuels, India has also suffered from upward pressure in power prices.
•
Strong regulatory support . In order to reduce dependence on energy imports and curtail the current trade deficit and resulting impact on the rupee,
the Indian government has taken a number of steps to
37
Table of Contents
incentivize the use of renewable sources of energy. These include establishing state-level renewable power purchase obligations, 10-year tax holiday,
accelerated depreciation, exemptions from other taxes and import tariffs, as well as providing viability gap funding, or VGF, to solar project
developers to make solar tariffs competitive in the country. To provide further impetus to solar growth, the Indian government launched the Jawaharlal
Nehru National Solar Mission, or NSM, in 2010.
•
Solar positioned to win among alternatives . India ranks among the highest irradiation receiving countries in the world with more than 300 days of
sunshine per year in much of the country. Solar power generation is viable across most of India, unlike wind and hydro resources which are
concentrated in specific regions. In addition, as solar plants can be built near the point of consumption, power produced generally does not incur
expensive transmission charges or require large infrastructure or transmission investments. Further, unlike nuclear and hydropower, solar power has
fewer legal liabilities and environmental constraints. The estimated potential for solar power in India is 749GW.
•
•
Solar energy approaching parity with conventional fossil fuels . State utilities have seen power costs rise as domestic coal shortages have caused
thermal generators to increasingly rely on more expensive imported coal. An analysis of current tariffs in India indicates that solar power is now
competitive with wind, new thermal capacity fueled by imported coal and grid power tariffs for commercial users. Further, diesel power, the most
common replacement power source for commercial and off-grid users in the country, is far more expensive than solar power. Additionally, solar panel
prices are expected to fall further, which in turn is expected to drive further reductions in solar tariffs.
Transparent solar auction process . Indian solar auctions are conducted in a transparent manner that ensures bids meet minimum technical and
financial criteria. Bidders must meet requirements on project development and execution history in India or the regional market, including bidder
experience in the development of similar utility scale power projects. Auctions are not winner-take-all; instead, they are constructed to ensure multiple
high-quality developers are allotted portions of the total capacity block.
These factors have increased the solar installation to approximately 12.2 GW as of March 2017. Approximately 20GW of additional tenders have been
announced under various solar policies. In addition, MNRE enhanced the capacity of solar parks and ultra-mega solar parks from 20GW to 40GW.
Our Approach
We sell energy to government utilities and independent industrial and commercial customers at predictable fixed prices. Since our energy generation does
not rely on fossil fuels, our electricity prices are insulated from the volatility of commodity pricing. We also guarantee the electricity production of our solar power
plants to our customers.
The typical project plan timeline for our projects is approximately thirteen months. The major stages of project sourcing, development and operation are
bidding, land acquisition, financing, material delivery and installation, as well as monitoring and maintenance. Once a bid is won, a letter of intent is issued and all
of our departments initiate their activities. After that, the PPA is signed, which reflects the commercial operation date before which a plant should be
commissioned. Generally, once the letter of intent is received, we obtain the relevant land permits depending on whether the land is government-owned or private.
We generally finance our projects with a 75:25 debt-to-equity ratio. Once land is obtained, our EPC team works very closely to construct and deliver the plant in
the most efficient manner. Once commissioned, our O&M team monitors performance of all the projects near real time.
We utilize our integrated project development, EPC, financing and O&M services without involving multiple third-party services. This approach has allowed
us to generate efficiencies of scale that further drive down system costs. A low cost structure allows us to bid for auctions strategically, which supports our high
auction win rate and helps preserve our market leading position, which further reduces costs.
As the first developer and operator of utility scale solar assets in India, we believe that we are a well-established brand that has grown alongside the
burgeoning Indian solar market since 2009. We have proven to be
38
Table of Contents
a reliable developer that successfully and expediently executes on our development pipeline and wins repeat business. Our reputation and track record give us an
advantage in the auction evaluation process, improving our win rate. As a result, we believe we have become one of the largest pure solar operators in the space,
which affords us greater negotiating power with original equipment manufacturers and project finance lenders. This in turn improves our cost and capital structure,
which benefits our bid win rate.
We lower the levelized cost of energy through our three-pronged approach as follows:
•
•
Value engineering . Our in-house EPC allows us to enhance our system design expertise with each successive project, be flexible with our choice of
technology and source from top-tier suppliers that optimizes both the system cost and power yield of the total solar block.
Operational performance monitoring . We operate a National Operating Control Center, or NOCC, that allows us to monitor project performance in
real-time and allows us to respond rapidly to potential generation anomalies. Feedback from our operating projects also serves to further enhance our
project designs, resulting in enhancements for current and new plants.
•
Financial strategy . We are able to offset project equity requirements through economic benefits generated by our EPC and O&M businesses.
Coupled with our asset financing strategy, we are able to optimize the overall cost of capital leading to enhanced economics for our customers and
shareholders.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe we differentiate ourselves from the competition in a number of key ways.
•
Market leadership We have a first mover advantage from the construction of India’s first private utility scale solar photovoltaic power plant in 2009
as well as the implementation of the first megawatt scale rooftop smart city initiative in 2013. Additionally, our strong track record in policy and
project development across utility scale and commercial rooftop projects has helped us gain a leading market share in India with an 9% share in federal
tenders we participated in between 2014 and 2017 and a market leading auction win rate of 74% for bids we participated in from 2010 to 2017.
•
•
Scale and brand-name recognition . We have proven to be a reliable developer with successful and expedient execution of our development pipeline,
which has helped us win repeat business. Our reputation and track record provide us an advantage in the auction evaluation process, thereby improving
our win rate. As a result, we believe we have become one of the largest solar developers and operators in India.
In-house EPC and O&M expertise enable cost efficiencies . Our in-house EPC capabilities enhance our ability to be flexible with our choice of
technology, which allows us to choose high quality equipment while optimizing the combination of total solar project cost and yield. Our in-house
O&M capabilities maximize project yield and performance through proprietary system monitoring and adjustments. We have demonstrated an 83%
decrease in total solar project cost since inception in part through continual innovation in our EPC and O&M capabilities.
39
Table of Contents
•
Superior technical and execution capabilities . We have developed proprietary systems that significantly reduce the time it takes to design, finance,
commission, operate and maintain projects. Our lean and efficient execution expertise facilitates completion of our plants ahead of contracted
completion dates, enables us to easily scale our operations without significant increases to headcount, and allows us to construct several projects in
parallel without compromising on efficiency.
•
Long term, stable cash generation . We typically enter into 25-year, fixed price PPAs with government agencies and independent commercial
businesses. As a result of generally reliable solar irradiation in India, our energy production under these PPAs has historically had little volatility,
which, coupled with our low operating expenses, makes for predictable cash flows from these agreements.
•
Long term community support . We hire from local communities and generally lease land that has few alternative uses, providing local communities
with a stream of discretionary cash flow without displacing alternative businesses. As a result we are able to build long term community relationships,
which allows us to improve our time of completion, further reducing project development risk.
•
Strong management . Our senior leadership team and Board of Directors include widely recognized experts in solar energy, energy finance and
public policy, with track records of building successful businesses. Our Board of Directors also includes Robert Kelly, Arno Harris, Barney Rush and
Cyril Cabanes, who are well-respected global authorities in energy finance and public policy.
Our Business Strategy
Key elements of our business strategy include the following.
•
Rapidly grow our project portfolio to achieve scale benefits. We intend to rapidly grow our project portfolio, which will enable us to achieve
further economies of scale. We plan to significantly expand our presence in commercial and micro-grid applications. In order to continue this growth,
we plan to reinvest our operating cash flow into new project development and construction.
•
Maintain position as a top Indian solar company. We are the longest tenured solar power producer in India and we believe we have the largest
portfolio of operating projects under the NSM and one of the largest portfolios of operating projects in India. We have developed critical operational
expertise and regional knowledge that improves project performance and expedites project execution, all of which should help us preserve our market
leading position.
•
Continue to drive project cost reductions. We will continue to reduce costs by leveraging our in-house EPC and O&M capabilities and by
improving our negotiating power with technology providers and project lenders. We expect to further reduce our cost of financing to reduce the cost of
energy for our customers and achieve grid parity with local alternatives in the utility market in the next few years.
•
Leverage track record and management relationships to shape policy. We have petitioned governments at the local, state and central levels for
substantial changes to solar policy that are essential to the advancement of the solar industry. We plan to leverage our track record, together with our
management’s long-running relationships with policy-makers, to influence policy at all governmental levels.
•
Expand into new locations. As of March 31, 2017, we had a presence in 18 of 36 states and union territories in India. Given the strength of the solar
resource through India and our distribution model, we intend to operate in every state that has structural power needs. We participate in both national
and state level renewable energy auctions. We intend to continue to expand our presence into other states in India and other emerging markets with
underserved electricity markets.
Seasonality
The energy output performance of our plants is dependent in part on the amount of sunlight. As a result, our revenue in the past has been impacted by shorter
daylight hours in winters. Typically, our revenue is the lowest in the third quarter and highest in the first quarter of any given fiscal year, which for us ends on
March 31.
40
Table of Contents
Please refer to – “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Power Purchase Agreements” for summary of our projects.
Competition
We believe our primary competitors are other solar developers such as Tata Power Solar Systems Limited, Adani Power Limited and ACME Cleantech
Solutions Private Limited. Competition to acquire new projects occurs at the development stage as we bid for long term PPAs in central and state solar power
auctions. We compete with other solar developers based on a number of factors, including the sourcing of solar projects, reputation and track record, relationship
with government authorities, access to capital and control over quality, access to project land, efficiency and reliability in project development. Based on these
factors, we believe that we compete favorably with our competitors in the regions we service.
We also compete with utilities generating power from conventional fossil fuels. Utilities generating conventional energy face rising costs as the constraints
on domestic fuel supply continue and these energy sources do not benefit from various governmental incentives available to renewable energy producers. As we
reduce our levelized cost and achieve parity with conventional energy suppliers, we expect to compete favorably with these suppliers on the basis of cost and
reliability.
However, we cannot guarantee that some of our competitors do not or will not have advantages over us in terms of larger size, internal access to solar panels
and greater operational, financial, technical, management, lower cost of capital or other resources.
Project Development
We participate in central- and state-level renewable energy auctions to build our utility scale portfolio. Our track record and size ensure we are able to
participate in all auctions. Our in-house EPC and O&M capabilities and our pan-India presence provide us with greater visibility into competitive metrics, which
allows us to bid strategically to maintain a high win rate while preserving good project economics.
The major stages of project sourcing, development and operation:
•
Bidding. We have a well-organized process to effectively track all the policies and bid updates in the market. Once a tender is tracked, relevant
information sourced from the request for proposal document is discussed with the finance and technical teams and approved by the relevant
committees before a strategic decision is made to participate in the bid. We also have an in-house project development information database which
help us predict and bid the most effective tariff in the market. Once the bid is won, a letter of intent is issued and all the departments initiate their
activities. Afterwards, the PPA is signed, which reflects the commercial operation date before which a plant should be commissioned.
41
Table of Contents
•
Land acquisition. Generally, once the letter of intent is received, we obtain the relevant land permits depending on whether the land is government-
owned or private. When the land is privately owned, we identify the appropriate parcels of land and due diligence is conducted by a local legal
counsel. We also undertake certain compliance measures, including technical diligence, soil testing, local advertisement, stakeholder consultation and
land registration after which acquisition is complete. When the land is government-owned, we identify the suitable parcels of land from the responsible
agency and obtain approval from the relevant authority.
•
Financing. The projects are generally financed with 75:25 debt-to-equity ratio. To enable rapid operation of our projects, we use short term credit
facilities that are refinanced with long term project finance facilities. We invest equity from internal accruals and new financings to help growth and
lower financing costs.
•
•
Material Delivery and Installation. Our procurement and construction teams work very closely to construct and deliver the plant in the most efficient
manner. A detailed project plan is made and the progress tracker on the delivery and construction is reviewed very closely. Accordingly, we have
consistently commissioned our projects before the commercial operation date.
Monitoring and Maintenance. Our operations team monitors performance of all the projects near real time from the NOCC, which allow us to respond
rapidly to potential generation anomalies. They also perform scheduled preventive maintenance tasks on daily, weekly, monthly, and annual intervals
to ensure our plants run smoothly and at high efficiency.
Suppliers and Service Providers
We purchase major components such as solar panels and inverters directly from multiple manufacturers. There are several suppliers in the market and we
select our suppliers based on expected cost, reliability, warranty coverage, ease of installation and other ancillary costs. As of the date of this annual report, our
primary solar panel suppliers were First Solar FE Holdings PTE Ltd., Waaree Energies Pvt. Ltd., and Canadian Solar Inc., and our primary inverter suppliers were
SMA Solar Technology AG, Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd., ABB India Limited, Hanwha Q CELLS Co., Ltd and Bonfiglioli Renewable Power Conversion
India Pvt Ltd. We also source copper cables from General Cable Corporation and solar mounting structures from Unirac, Inc. We also engage the engineering
services of Lahmeyer Group, Black & Veatch and Fichtner Consulting Engineers. We typically enter into master contractual arrangements with our major suppliers
that define the general terms and conditions of our purchases, including warranties, product specifications, indemnities, delivery and other customary terms. We
normally purchase solar panels and the balance of system components on an as-needed basis from our suppliers at then-prevailing prices pursuant to purchase
orders issued under our master contractual arrangements. We generally do not have any supplier arrangements that contain long-term pricing or volume
commitments, although at times in the past we have made limited purchase commitments to ensure sufficient supply of components. The prices of components for
our solar power plants have declined over time as the manufacturers have lowered their cost of production, although the pace of this decline has been slowing
recently.
In addition, in April 2010, we entered into an agreement with SunEdison Energy India Private Limited, or SunEdison, whereby upon the satisfaction of
certain conditions, SunEdison would provide monitoring technologies and hardware at cost to 25 MW of our utility scale projects in India. The Company has
entered into a strategic agreements in which Hanwha Q Cells Korea Corporation has invested in the Andhra Pradesh 1 project and the Punjab 4 Project. We have
entered into a master supply agreement with First Solar FE Holdings Pte. Limited for 190 MW offering preferential payments terms and supply credit for up to two
years from supply date. Furthermore, we source lender technical due diligence and supplier third party certification from Lahmeyer International (India) Private
Limited.
42
Table of Contents
Government Regulations
The Electricity Act, 2003
The Electricity Act, 2003, or Electricity Act, regulates and governs the generation, transmission, distribution, trading and use of electricity in India. Under
the Electricity Act, the transmission, distribution and trade of electricity are regulated activities that require licenses from the relevant electricity regulatory
commission (Central Electricity Regulatory Commission), State Electricity Regulatory Commissions, or SERCs, or the joint commission (constituted by an
agreement entered into by two or more state governments or the central government in relation to one or more state governments, as the case may be).
In terms of the Electricity Act, any generating company may establish, operate and maintain generating stations without obtaining a license if it complies
with prescribed technical standards relating to grid connectivity. The generating company is required to establish, operate and maintain generating stations, tie-
lines, sub-stations and dedicated transmission lines.
Further, the generating company may supply electricity to any licensee or even directly to consumers, subject to availing open access to the transmission and
distribution systems and payment of transmission charges, including wheeling charges and open access charges, as may be determined by the relevant electricity
regulatory commission. In terms of the Electricity Act, open access means the non-discriminatory provision for the use of transmission lines or distribution system
or associated facilities with such lines or system, by any licensee or consumer or a person engaged in generation in accordance with the regulations specified by the
relevant electricity regulatory commission.
The relevant electricity regulatory commission is empowered to, among other things, determine or adopt the tariff for supply of electricity from the
generating company to a distribution licensee (such as the distribution utility companies), for transmission of electricity, wheeling of electricity and retail sale of
electricity. However, the relevant electricity regulatory commission may, in case of shortage of supply of electricity, fix the minimum and maximum tariffs for sale
or purchase of electricity under agreements between a generating company and a licensee or between licensees, for a period not exceeding one year, to ensure
reasonable prices of electricity. While determining the tariff, commissions are required to be guided by, among others, the promotion of co-generation and
generation of electricity from renewable sources of energy.
Under the Electricity Act, certain offences including the theft of electricity, electric lines and materials, interference with meters or works of a licensee, the
negligent waste of electricity and non-compliance of orders or directions attract monetary penalties ranging from INR 0.01 million to INR 0.1 million and
imprisonment for periods ranging from three months to three years. Additionally, non-compliance with orders of the Regional Load Dispatch Centre and State
Load Dispatch Centre may result in penalties of up to INR 15 million.
Further, the Electricity Rules, 2005, or the Electricity Rules, also prescribe a regulatory framework for developing captive generating plants. Pursuant to the
Electricity Rules, a power plant shall qualify as a captive power plant only if not less than 26% of the ownership is held by captive users and not less than 51% of
the aggregate electricity generated in such plant, determined on an annual basis, is consumed for captive use. Further, in case of association of persons, the captive
users are required to hold not less than 26% of the ownership of the plant in aggregate and consume not less than 51% of the electricity generated, determined on
an annual basis, in proportion to their share ownership in the power plant within a variation not exceeding 10%.
In case of a generating station owned by a company formed as a special purpose vehicle, the electricity required to be consumed by captive users is to be
determined with reference to such unit or units identified for captive use and not with reference to the generating station as a whole and equity shares to be held by
the captive users must not be less than 26% of the proportionate equity interest of the company related to the generating unit or units identified as the captive
generating plant.
43
Table of Contents
The Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2014 was introduced in the lower house of the Indian Parliament to amend certain provisions of the Electricity Act.
Among others, the amendment empowers the Indian government to establish and review a national renewable energy policy, tariff policy and electricity policy.
Further, the Indian government may, in consultation with the state governments, notify policies and adopt measures for promotion of renewable energy generation
including through tax rebates, generation linked incentive, creation of national renewable energy fund, development of renewable industry and for effective
implementation and enforcement of such measures.
The generating company is also required to ensure compliance with certain other regulations, including the Central Electricity Authority (Safety
Requirements for Construction, Operation and Maintenance of Electrical Plants and Electric Lines) Regulations, 2011.
The National Electricity Policy, 2005
The Indian government approved the National Electricity Policy on February 12, 2005, in accordance with the provisions of the Electricity Act. The National
Electricity Policy, 2005 has material effects on our business since it provides the policy framework to the central and state Electricity Regulatory Commission in
developing the power sector, supplying electricity and protecting interests of consumers and other stakeholders, while keeping in view the availability of energy
resources, technology available to exploit such resources, economics of generation using different resources and energy security issues. The National Electricity
Policy emphasizes the need to promote generation of electricity based on non-conventional sources of energy.
The National Electricity Policy provides that the SERCs should specify appropriate tariffs in order to promote renewable energy, until renewable energy
power producers relying on non-conventional technologies can compete with conventional sources of energy. The SERCs are required to ensure progressive
increase in the share of generation of electricity from renewable energy sources and provide suitable measures for connectivity with grid and sale of electricity to
any person. Further, the SERCs are required to specify, for the purchase of electricity from renewable energy sources, a percentage of the total consumption of
electricity in the area of a distribution licensee. Furthermore, the National Electricity Policy provides that such purchase of electricity by distribution companies
should be through a competitive bidding process. The National Electricity Policy permits the SERCs to determine appropriate differential prices for the purchase of
electricity from renewable energy power producers, in order to promote renewable sources of energy.
The National Tariff Policy, 2016
The Indian Government notified the revised National Tariff Policy effective from January 28, 2016. Among others, the National Tariff Policy seeks to ensure
availability of electricity to consumers at reasonable and competitive rates, financial viability of the sector and attract investments and promote generation of
electricity from renewable sources.
The National Tariff Policy mandates that state electricity regulatory commissions must reserve a minimum percentage for purchase of solar energy
equivalent to 8% of total consumption of energy by March 2022. In order to further encourage renewable sources of energy, the National Tariff Policy mandates
that no inter-state transmission charges and losses shall be levied till such period as may be notified on transmission of the electricity generated from solar power
plants through the inter-state transmission system for sale.
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Tariff Determination from Renewable Energy Sources) Regulations, 2012
The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission has announced the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Tariff
Determination from Renewable Energy Sources) Regulations, 2012, or Tariff Regulations, which prescribes the criteria that may be taken into consideration by the
SERCs
44
Table of Contents
while determining the tariff for the sale of electricity generated from renewable energy sources which include, among others, return on equity, interest on loan
capital and depreciation. Accordingly, such tariff cannot be determined independently by renewable energy power producers such as our company. Pursuant to the
National Tariff Policy, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission is required to determine the rate of return on equity which may be adopted by the SERCs to
determine the generic tariff, keeping in view the overall risk and prevalent cost of capital, which factors are also to be taken into consideration by SERCs while
determining the tariff rate. The Tariff Regulations prescribe that the normative return on equity shall be 20% per annum for the first 10 years and 24% per annum
from the 11th year onwards.
The Tariff Regulations also provide the mechanism for sharing of carbon credits from approved clean development mechanism projects between renewable
energy power producers and the concerned beneficiaries. Under the Tariff Regulations, the project developer is entitled to retain 100% of the gross proceeds on
account of clean development mechanism project benefit in the first year after the date of commercial operation of the generating station. Subsequently, in the
second year, the share of the beneficiaries is increased to 10% and then progressively increased by 10% every year until it reaches 50% after which the clean
development mechanism project proceeds are to be shared equally between the generating company and the beneficiaries.
Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission
The NSM was approved by the Indian government on November 19, 2009 and launched on January 11, 2010. The NSM has set a target of 100,000 MW of
solar power in India by 2022 and seeks to implement and achieve the target in three phases (Phase I from 2012 to 2013, Phase II from 2013 to 2017 and Phase III
from 2017 to 2022). NSM aims at creating conditions for rapid scale up of capacity and technological innovation to drive down costs towards grid parity.
Renewable Purchase Obligations
The Electricity Act promotes the development of renewable sources of energy by requiring the SERCs to ensure grid connectivity and the sale of electricity
generated from renewable sources. In addition, it requires the SERCs to specify, for the purchase of electricity from renewable sources, a percentage of the total
consumption of electricity within the area of a distribution licensee, which are known as RPOs. Pursuant to this mandate, most of the SERCs have specified solar
and non-solar RPOs in their respective states. In terms of the RPO regulations, RPOs are required to be met by obligated entities (that is, distribution licensees,
captive power plants and open access consumers) by purchasing renewable energy, either by entering into PPAs with renewable energy power producers or by
purchasing renewable energy certificates. The RPO regulations require the obligated entities to purchase power from renewable energy power producers such as
our company. In the event of default by an obligated entity in any fiscal year, the SERCs may direct the obligated entity to deposit an amount determined by the
relevant SERC, into a fund to be utilized for, among others, the purchase of renewable energy certificates. Additionally, pursuant to the Electricity Act, a defaulting
obligated entity may also be liable to pay penalty as determined by the SERCs.
In May 2015, the Supreme Court of India upheld a regulation that made it compulsory for captive power plants and open access consumers to purchase
electricity to fulfill their RPOs. This landmark judgment is expected to boost the demand for renewable energy by captive players and also improve the
marketability of renewable energy certificates in India.
Safety and Environmental Laws
We are governed by certain safety and environmental legislations, including the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention
and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.
45
Table of Contents
Under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, failure to comply with the
orders and restrictions passed by the State Pollution Control Boards may result in imprisonment of a minimum term of one and a half years. Additionally, certain
acts including the destruction of property of the State Pollution Control Boards, failure to intimate the emission of pollutants or failure to furnish information to the
State Pollution Control Boards may attract monetary penalties of up to INR 0.01 million and imprisonment of up to three months.
The failure to comply with the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 may attract monetary penalties as
levied by the State Pollution Control Board and a liability for any damage to the environment or third parties.
Labor Laws
We are required to comply with certain labor and industrial laws, which includes the Factories Act, 1948, the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Employees
State Insurance Act, 1948, the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Payment of Bonus Act,
1965, the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 and the Payment of
Wages Act, 1936.
Each of these legislations carry a penalty provision for non-compliance, which prescribe monetary penalties ranging from INR 0.001 million to INR
0.005 million and imprisonment for periods ranging from one month to three years.
State Regulations
Various states in India have from time to time, announced administrative policies and regulations in relation to solar power projects and related matters.
These state-specific policies and regulations have material effects on our business because PPAs between project developers and state offtakers are entered into in
accordance with the relevant state policies and regulations. Accordingly, these PPAs are standard form contracts and the project developers have no flexibility in
negotiating the terms of the PPAs. The majority of our solar power plant generation occurs in Rajasthan, Punjab, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.
For instance, for our projects in the states of Rajasthan, Punjab and Karnataka, our projects are subject to certain state policies as discussed below.
Rajasthan
The Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited is the agency responsible for promoting and developing renewable energy in the state of Rajasthan.
The government of Rajasthan has formulated the Rajasthan Solar Energy Policy, 2014, or Rajasthan Policy, which has come into effect on October 8, 2014 and will
remain in force until superseded or modified by another policy. The Rajasthan Policy aims to create an enabling environment for installation of 25,000 MW of solar
power. Generation of electricity from solar power plants under the Rajasthan Policy will be treated as an eligible industry under the scheme administered by the
Industries Department, Government of Rajasthan and incentives available to industrial units under the Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme will be available to
solar power projects. In accordance with the Rajasthan Policy, a solar power project with a capacity of 500 MW or more, established by a single developer at a
single location with single or multiple metering requirements but having a common pooling sub-station will be considered as a mega solar power project. Mega
solar power projects are entitled to an expedited project approval process.
Punjab
The Punjab Energy Development Agency is the agency responsible for promotion and development of renewable energy development projects and energy
conservation schemes in the state of Punjab. The government
46
Table of Contents
of Punjab has formulated the New and Renewable Sources of Energy Policy-2012, or Punjab Policy, on December 26, 2012. The Punjab Policy aims to harness
1000 MW of solar power generation capacity by 2022. All solar power projects developed under the Punjab Policy are treated as an industry in terms of industrial
policy of Punjab and all the industrial incentives available to new industrial units will be applicable to solar power plants subject to the approval of Department of
Industries and Commerce, Government of Punjab. Additionally, solar power projects are exempt from obtaining any consent in accordance with the pollution
control laws from the Punjab Pollution Control Board. The Punjab State Power Corporation Limited reserves the right of first refusal on the power generated from
renewable energy certificate based solar power projects and in case of refusal, the developer is permitted to sell the power under open access.
Karnataka
The Karnataka Renewable Energy Development Limited is the agency responsible for promoting and developing renewable energy in the state of Karnataka.
The government of Karnataka has formulated the Karnataka Solar Policy 2014-2021, or Karnataka Policy, which will remain in effect until 2021 or until modified
by another policy. The Karnataka Policy aims to harness a minimum of 6,000 MW by 2021 in multiple phases. Generation of solar power under the Karnataka
Policy is attractive to project developers because the policy provides incentives such as tax concessions under the Karnataka Industrial Policy and central excise
duty and customs duty exemptions. Solar projects are further exempt from obtaining consent from the Karnataka Pollution Control Board as required under the
pollution control laws.
47
Table of Contents
C. Organizational Structure
The following diagram illustrates our corporate structure as of the date of this annual report.
Notes:
(1)
(2)
(3)
The sole member of IW Green LLC is Mr. Inderpreet S. Wadhwa.
Refers to Mr. Inderpreet S. Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa.
Azure Power Global Limited has an option to purchase the equity shares, in Azure Power India Private Limited, from the Founders.
The following table sets out our significant subsidiaries on the basis of revenue generated during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:
Name
Azure Power India Private Limited
Azure Solar Private Limited (Rajasthan 2.1, 2,2)
Azure Power Infrastructure Private Ltd (Andhra Pradesh 1)
D. Property, Plants and Equipment
Country of
Incorporation
India
India
India
Percentage of
Ownership
96.3%
100%
71.42%
Our principal executive offices are located at 8, 17, 18, 19 and 20 Local Shopping Complex, Pushp Vihar, Madangir, New Delhi 110062, India, which
occupies approximately 20,410 square feet of space. Our power projects are located primarily on land leased from the state governments and third parties and
freehold land
48
Table of Contents
purchased by us from private individuals and entities. The following table sets forth the details of our tangible fixed assets associated with our utility scale power
projects as of March 31, 2017.
PROJECTS
Punjab 1
Gujarat 1
Rajasthan 1
Rajasthan 2
Punjab 2
Uttar Pradesh 1
Karnataka 1
Rajasthan 3
Chhattisgarh 1
Karnataka 2
Punjab 3
Rajasthan 4
Karnataka 3
Andhra Pradesh 1
Bihar 1
Delhi 1
Maharashtra 1
Punjab 4
Andhra Pradesh 2
Uttar Pradesh 2
Telangana 1
Andhra Pradesh 3
Uttar Pradesh 3
Productive
Capacity
(MW)
2
10
5
35
34
10
10
100
30
10
28
5
130
50
10
3
7
150
100
50
100
50
40
Ownership (1)
Leasehold
Freehold
Leasehold
Leasehold
Leasehold
Freehold
Freehold
Leasehold
Freehold
Freehold
Leasehold
Leasehold
Freehold
Freehold
Freehold
Right to Use
Right to Use
Leasehold
Leasehold
Freehold
Freehold
Leasehold
Right to Use
Location
Punjab 1
Gujarat 1
Rajasthan 1
Rajasthan 2
Punjab 2
Uttar Pradesh 1
Karnataka 1
Rajasthan 3
Chhattisgarh 1
Karnataka 2
Punjab 3
Rajasthan 4
Karnataka 3
Andhra Pradesh 1
Bihar 1
Delhi 1
Maharashtra 1
Punjab 4
Andhra Pradesh 2
Uttar Pradesh 2
Telangana 1
Andhra Pradesh 3
Uttar Pradesh 3
(1)
Our leasehold land is typically leased for 25 to 35 years, but our PPAs are generally for a term of 25 years. We believe that our facilities are in good
condition and generally suitable and adequate for our needs in the foreseeable future. However, we will continue to seek additional space as needed to satisfy
our growth.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
The
following
discussion
of
our
business,
financial
condition
and
results
of
operations
should
be
read
in
conjunction
with
“Item
3.
Key
Information
—
A.
Selected
Consolidated
Financial
Data”
and
our
consolidated
financial
statements
and
the
related
notes
included
elsewhere
in
this
annual
report.
This
discussion
contains
forward-looking
statements
and
involves
numerous
risks
and
uncertainties,
including,
but
not
limited
to,
those
described
in
“Item
3.
Key
Information
—
D.
Risk
Factors”
and
elsewhere
in
this
annual
report.
Actual
results
could
differ
materially
from
those
contained
in
any
forward-looking
statements.
Overview
Our mission is to be the lowest-cost power producer in the world. We sell solar power in India on long term fixed price contracts to our customers, at prices
which in many cases are at or below prevailing alternatives for our customers. We are also developing micro-grid applications for the highly fragmented and
underserved electricity market in India.
We generate revenue from a mix of leading government entities such as NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited, a subsidiary of NTPC Limited, Delhi Metro
Rail Corporation, Indian Railways and the Solar Energy
49
Table of Contents
Corporation of India as well as commercial entities such as Torrent Power Limited, DLF Limited, and Oberoi Hotels. We typically enter into 25 year power
purchase agreements, or PPAs with these customers who pay a fixed rate for electricity generated by our solar power plants. Our financial strategy is to build our
solar assets with the most efficient cost of capital available to us. Because we have our own engineering, procurement and construction, or EPC, as well as
operations and maintenance, or O&M, capabilities, we retain the profit margins associated with those services that other project developers normally pay to third
party providers. Through value engineering, operational performance monitoring and efficient financial strategy, we are able to deliver cost-effective energy to our
customers.
We recognize revenue from solar energy sold to our customers on a per kilowatt hour basis based on the energy actually supplied by our solar power plant.
The procurement of solar power by the utilities in the market is primarily driven by the renewable energy purchase obligation imposed on them by the Indian
government. Most Indian state and central government electricity regulators establish the rate that utilities pay to buy power in their respective jurisdictions, which
we call the benchmark tariff. As a result, the price a customer pays to buy solar energy from us varies depending on the jurisdiction in which the customer is
located. The price at which we sell solar energy also depends on our bidding strategy, as most auctions award bids starting from the lowest bidder until the total
capacity is awarded. For our commercial PPAs, we sell solar energy at mutually negotiated rates that are lower than the commercial electricity rates charged by the
utilities in the markets we serve, which is consistent with our strategy to price our energy lower than the commercial rates. As a result, the price that a commercial
customer pays to buy solar energy from us depends on the state in which such customer is located and the prevailing local commercial tariff.
We recognize revenue on a monthly basis from the solar energy kilowatt hours sold to our customers post the installation of the system and approval of the
energy grid interconnect connections. The energy output performance of our plants is dependent in part on the amount of sunlight. As a result, our revenue in the
past has been impacted by shorter daylight hours in winters. Typically, our revenue from operational solar power plants is lowest in the third quarter and highest in
the first quarter of any given fiscal year which ends on March 31.
A significant portion of the cost of our solar power plants consists of solar photovoltaic panels, inverters and other plant equipment. Other less significant
costs of our solar power plants include land or leasehold land costs, financing costs and installation costs. Our cost of operations primarily consists of expenses
pertaining to operations and maintenance of our solar power plants. These expenses include payroll and related costs for plant maintenance staff, plant
maintenance, insurance and, if applicable, lease costs.
Under U.S. GAAP, we depreciate the capital cost of solar power plants over the estimated useful life of 25 years.
We typically fund our projects through a mix of project finance and sponsor equity. We generally raise long term debt financing of approximately 75% of
project costs. The remaining 25% of project costs required is met through a mix of cash flow generated from our business and equity proceeds. Our project
financing agreements typically restrict the ability of our project subsidiaries to distribute funds to us unless specific financial thresholds are met on specified dates.
Some of our project finance borrowings are denominated in U.S. dollars and therefore foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations can adversely impact our
profitability. Some of our borrowings have variable interest rates and changes in such rates may lead to an adverse effect on our overall cost of capital.
From time to time, we have raised funds through issuance of compulsorily convertible debentures and Series A through I compulsorily convertible preferred
shares. We classified our previously outstanding compulsorily convertible debentures and Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares as a
liability on our consolidated balance sheet. Series A to D, Series F, Series H and Series I compulsorily convertible preferred shares were classified as temporary
equity on the consolidated balance sheet till March 31, 2016. Concurrent to the closing of our initial public offering in October 2016, the compulsorily convertible
debentures and compulsorily convertible preferred shares were converted into equity shares.
50
Table of Contents
Power Purchase Agreement
The material terms of the PPAs we have entered into and bids we have won as of March 31, 2017 are summarized in the following table.
Operational
Project Names
Commercial
Operation
Date (1)
Capacity
(MW)
(10)
Punjab 1
Punjab 2.1
Punjab 2.2
Punjab 2.3
Punjab 3.1
Punjab 3.2
Punjab 4.1 (5)
Punjab 4.2 (5)
Punjab 4.3 (5)
Gujarat 1.1
Gujarat 1.2
Rajasthan 1
Rajasthan 2.1
Rajasthan 2.2
Rajasthan 3.1
Rajasthan 3.2
Rajasthan 3.3
Rajasthan 4
Chhattisgarh 1.1
Chhattisgarh 1.2
Chhattisgarh 1.3
Delhi 1.1
Andhra Pradesh 1 (4)
Uttar Pradesh 1
Bihar
Karnataka 1
Karnataka 2
Karnataka 3.1
Karnataka 3.2
Karnataka 3.3
Maharashtra 1.1
Maharashtra 1.2
Total Capacity
Q4 2009
Q3 2014
Q4 2014
Q4 2014
Q1 2016
Q1 2016
Q4 2016
Q4 2016
Q4 2016
Q2 2011
Q4 2011
Q4 2011
Q1 2013
Q1 2013
Q2 2015
Q2 2015
Q2 2015
Q4 2015
Q2 2015
Q2 2015
Q3 2015
Q4 2015
Q1 2016
Q1 2015
Q3 2016
Q1 2015
Q1 2016
Q1 2017
Q1 2017
Q1 2017
Q1 2017
Q1 2017
2
15
15
4
24
4
50
50
50
5
5
5
20
15
20
40
40
5
10
10
10
1
50
10
10
10
10
50
40
40
2
5
627
Offtaker
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Tariff
(INR/kWh)
17.91
7.67
7.97
8.28
7.19
7.33
5.62
5.63
5.64
15.00(2) Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited
15.00(2) Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited
11.94
8.21
8.21
5.45(3) Solar Energy Corporation of India
5.45(3) Solar Energy Corporation of India
5.45(3) Solar Energy Corporation of India
5.45(3) Solar Energy Corporation of India
Chhattisgarh State Power
6.44
Distribution Company Limited
Chhattisgarh State Power
Distribution Company Limited
Chhattisgarh State Power
Distribution Company Limited
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited
6.46
6.45
5.43(3) Solar Energy Corporation of India
5.89(2)
Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh
Limited
8.99
8.39
7.47
Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited
North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited and South
Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited
Bangalore Electricity Supply
Company Limited
Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited
Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation Limited
Hubli Electricity Supply Company Limited
Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company Limited
6.66
6.51
6.51
6.51
5.50(3) Ordinance Factory Bhandara
Ordinance Factory Ambajhari
5.31
51
Duration
of PPA in
Years
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
12
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Table of Contents
Project Names
Delhi 1.2
Andhra Pradesh 2
Andhra Pradesh 3
Uttar Pradesh 2 (5)
Uttar Pradesh 3
Telangana 1
Total Capacity
Commercial
Operation
Date (1)
Capacity
(MW)
(10)
Tariff
(INR/kWh)
Under
Construction
Offtaker
Q2 2017
Q2 2017
Q4 2017
Q2 2017
Q4 2017
Q3 2017
2
100
50
50
40
100
342
NTPC Limited
5.43(3) Solar Energy Corporation of India
5.12
4.43(3) Solar Energy Corporation of India
4.78
4.43(3) Solar Energy Corporation of India
4.67
NTPC Limited
NTPC Limited
Commercial and Industrial (8)
Project Names
Gujarat Rooftop
DLF (total)
Uttar Pradesh
Rooftop 1
Delhi Rooftop 1
Delhi Rooftop 2
Punjab Rooftop 1
Delhi Rooftop 3
Punjab Rooftop 2
Oberoi (total)
Delhi Rooftop 4
Total Capacity
Commercial
Operation
Date (1)
Capacity
(MW) (10)
Commissioned
Offtaker
2013
2013-2016
Q1 2015
2.5
1.898
0.555
Torrent Power Limited
DLF Limited
Indosolar Limited
Q2 2015
Q2 2015
Q3 2015
Q2 2016
Q2 2016
Q3 2016
Q1 2017
JCBL Limited
Indraprastha Power Generation Co. Limited
Delhi Gymkhana Club Limited
Taj Sats Air Catering Limited
0.056
0.178
1
0.918(7)
10
0.839
6.005(7) Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
23.946
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Oberoi Resorts/EIH Limited
52
Duration
of PPA in
Years
25
25
25
25
25
25
Duration
of PPA in
Years
25
25
25
25
20
25
25
25
15
25
Table of Contents
Project Names
Commercial
Operation
Date (1)
Capacity
(MW) (11)
Offtaker
Odisha Rooftop 1
Q2 2017
Q3 2017
Under
Construction
4(7)
Green Energy Development Corporation
of Odisha Limited
7.996(8) Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
11.996
1.200
Pennar Industries Limited
Committed
Q4 2017
Q1 2018
Q2 2018
Q4 2017
0.764
0.476
Oberoi Resorts/EIH Limited
Desh Bhagat University
16(7) Delhi Jal Board
46(9)
Indian Railways
64.44
1,069
Delhi Rooftop 4
Total Capacity
Tamil Nadu
Rooftop 1
Oberoi 2
Punjab Rooftop 3
Delhi Rooftop 5
Indian Railways
Rooftop (6)
Total Capacity
Total Capacity
(all projects)
Duration
of PPA in
Years
25
25
25
15
25
25
25
Notes:
(1)
Refers to the applicable quarter of the calendar year. There can be no assurance that our projects under construction and our committed projects will be
completed on time or at all.
Current tariff, subject to change — see paragraph below — “tariff structure”.
Projects are supported by VGF in addition to the tariff — see paragraph below — “VGF for projects”.
Hanwha Q CELLS Korea holds a non-controlling interest against its investment of INR 216.9 million.
Hanwha Energy Corporation Singapore Pte. Ltd. holds a non-controlling interest.
Out of 46 MW awarded; PPAs signed for 23MW.
Projects are supported by subsidy in addition to the tariff.
The levellized tariff for the Commercial and Industrial projects is between INR 5.80 to INR 10.62.
Projects are supported by capital incentive in addition to tariff.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10) Capacity as defined by the PPA contract.
Our PPAs typically require certain conditions are met including, among others, that we have obtained all necessary consents and permits, financing
arrangements have been made and an agreement has been entered into to provide for the transmission of power. Furthermore, the PPAs contain customary
termination provisions and negative and affirmative covenants, including the provision of performance bank guarantees and minimum guarantees of power to be
sold and restrictions on changing the controlling shareholder of the project subsidiaries.
Tariff structure
The tariff for Gujrat 1.1 and Gujrat 1.2 is INR 15.0 per kilowatt hour for the first 12 years and INR 5.0 per kilowatt hour for remainder of the contract term.
The tariff for Andhra Pradesh 1 is INR 5.89 per kilowatt hour for one year, increasing by 3% each year from the second year to the tenth year and thereafter with
the same tariff as that in year ten for the remainder of the 25-year term.
VGF for projects
The VGF for Rajasthan 3.1 project is INR 23.0 million per MW, for Rajasthan 3.2 it is INR 22,0 million per MW, for Rajasthan 3.3 it is INR 13.0 million per
MW and Rajasthan 4 it is INR 12.9 million per MW. The VGF for Andhra Pradesh 3 project is INR 7.5 million per MW. The VGF for Maharashtra 1 project is
INR 0.9 million per MW. The VGF for Uttar Pradesh 3 is INR 10.0 million per MW. The VGF for Delhi 1 is INR 4.6 million per MW.
53
Table of Contents
Key Operating and Financial Metrics
We regularly review a number of specific metrics, including the following key operating and financial metrics, to evaluate our business performance,
identify trends affecting our business and make strategic decisions.
Key metrics
Electricity generation(1)
Plant load factor
Revenue(2)
Cost per MW operating
MW operating
MW committed
MW operating and committed
Unit of Measurement
kWh in millions
%
INR in millions
INR in millions
MW
MW
MW
FY 2016
364.8
18.1
2,626.1
59.6
336.0
479.0
815.0
FY 2017
617.5
18.4
4,183.0
49.3
651.0
418.0
1,069.0
(1)
(2)
Electricity generation represents the actual amount of power generated by our solar power plants over the reporting period and is the product of plant load
factor during the reporting period and the average megawatts operating.
Revenue consists of revenue from the sale of power.
Factors that most significantly directly or indirectly affect our overall growth and results of operations, or that cause our historical financial information not
to be indicative of future operating results or financial condition, include, but are not limited to, the Indian government’s targets for solar capacity addition and the
more gradual decline in solar module prices. The Indian government recently increased its target for solar capacity from 20GW by 2022 to 100GW by 2022. While
this trend may lead to us winning more megawatts per year than in prior years, it will also require us to raise additional funding sources if we are to grow in line
with these trends.
As for the cost of our system components, we witnessed a steep decline of solar module prices of approximately 82% from 2010 to 2017. Although the pace
of this decline has been slowing recently, we expect a general trend of declining solar module prices to continue through fiscal year 2018.
Operating Metrics
Megawatts Operating and Megawatts Committed
We measure the rated capacity of our plants in megawatts. Rated capacity is the expected maximum output that a solar power plant can produce without
exceeding its design limits. We believe that tracking the growth in aggregate megawatt rated capacity is a measure of the growth rate of our business.
Megawatts
Operating
represents the aggregate cumulative megawatt rated capacity of solar power plants that are commissioned and operational as of the
reporting date.
Megawatts
Committed
represents the aggregate megawatt rated capacity of solar power plants pursuant to customer PPAs signed or allotted but not
commissioned and operational as of the reporting date.
The following table represents the megawatts operating and megawatts committed as of the end of the respective periods presented:
Megawatts Operating
Megawatts Committed
Megawatts Operating and Committed
54
As of March 31,
2016
336.0
479.0
815.0
2017
651.0
418.0
1,069.0
Table of Contents
We are targeting having 1,000 MW to 1,200 MW operating by March 31, 2018. Our ability to achieve these goals will depend on, among other things, our
ability to acquire the required land for the new capacity (on lease or direct purchase), raising adequate project financing and working capital, the growth of the
Indian power market in line with current government targets, our ability to maintain our market share of India’s installed capacity as competition increases, the
need to further strengthen our operations team to execute the increased capacity, and the need to further strengthen our systems and processes to manage the
ensuing growth opportunities, as well as the other risks and challenges discussed under the caption “Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors.”
Plant Load Factor
The plant load factor is the ratio of the actual output of all our solar power plants over the reporting period to their potential output if it were possible for
them to operate indefinitely at full rated capacity. The plant load factor is not the same as the availability factor. Our solar power plants have high availability, that
is, when the sun is shining our plants are almost always able to produce electricity. The variability in our plant load factor is a result of seasonality, cloud covers,
the daily rotation of the earth, equipment efficiency losses, breakdown of our transmission system and grid availability.
We track plant load factor as a measure of the performance of our power plants. It indicates effective utilization of resources and also validates our value
engineering and operation research. Higher plant load factor at a plant indicates increased electricity generation. Monitoring plant load factor on real time allows us
to respond rapidly to potential generation anomalies. Generally, under the terms of our PPAs, we guarantee a plant load factor of 12%. Plant load factor was 18.4%
for fiscal year 2017 compared with 18.1% for fiscal year 2016, primarily due to improved solar radiation and O&M techniques.
Plant Load Factor (%)
Electricity Generation
Fiscal Year Ended
March 31,
2016
18.1
2017
18.4
Electricity generation represents the actual amount of power generated by our solar power plants over the reporting period and is the product of reporting
period plant load factor and the average megawatts operating. This is a measure of the periodic performance of our solar power plants.
Electricity Generation (kilowatt hours in millions)
Financial Metrics
Adjusted EBITDA
Fiscal Year Ended
March 31,
2016
365
2017
618
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. We present Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure of our performance. This measurement is
not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures of performance. The presentation of Adjusted EBITDA
should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items.
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss plus (a) income tax expense, (b) interest expense, net, (c) depreciation and amortization and (d) loss (income) on
foreign currency exchange. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because:
•
securities analysts and other interested parties use such calculations as a measure of financial performance and debt service capabilities; and
55
Table of Contents
•
it is used by our management for internal reporting and planning purposes, including aspects of our consolidated operating budget and capital
expenditures.
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported
under U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations include:
•
•
•
•
it does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments or foreign exchange gain/loss;
it does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital;
it does not reflect significant interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our outstanding debt; it
does not reflect payments made or future requirements for income taxes; and
although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced or paid in the
future and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash requirements for such replacements or payments.
Investors are encouraged to evaluate each adjustment and the reasons we consider it appropriate for supplemental analysis.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA:
Net loss
Income tax expense
Interest expense, net
Depreciation and amortization
Loss/(gain) on foreign currency exchange
Adjusted EBITDA
Project Cost per Megawatt Operating
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2016
INR
2017
US$
INR
(In thousands)
(1,654,840)
327,745
2,058,836
687,781
343,137
1,762,659
(1,191,569)
892,333
2,371,836
1,046,565
(109,128)
3,010,037
(18,374)
13,760
36,574
16,138
(1,683)
46,415
Project cost per megawatt operating consists of solar photovoltaic panels, inverters, balance of plant equipment, land or leasehold land, capitalizable
financing, and installation costs incurred for operating one megawatt of new solar power plant capacity during the reporting period. It is an indicator of our strong
engineering, procurement and construction capabilities, market cost of material and our ability to procure such material at competitive prices. A reduction in project
cost per megawatt helps reduce the cost of power and thereby improves our ability to win new projects. The project cost per megawatt operating for the fiscal years
ended March 31, 2016 and 2017 was INR 59.6 million and INR 49.3 million (US$0.8 million), respectively. The project cost per megawatt has declined as a result
of decreasing solar module prices and balance of system costs. We expect project costs to decline during fiscal year 2018.
Nominal Contracted Payments
Our PPAs create long-term recurring customer payments. Nominal contracted payments equal the sum of the estimated payments that the customer is likely
to make, subject to discounts or rebates, over the remaining term of the PPAs. When calculating nominal contracted payments, we include those PPAs for projects
that are operating or committed. To calculate the nominal contracted payments, we multiply the contract price per
56
Table of Contents
kilowatt hour as per the respective PPA by the estimated annual energy output for the remaining life of the PPA period. In estimating the nominal contracted
payments, we multiply the PPA contract price per kilowatt hour by the estimated annual energy output for all solar projects committed and operating as of the
reporting date. The estimated annual energy output of our solar projects is calculated using power generation simulation software and validated by independent
engineering firms. The main assumption used in the calculation is the project location, which enables the software to derive the estimated annual energy output
from certain metrological data, including the temperature, wind speed and solar radiation based on the project location. Our power generation simulation software
calculates the estimated annual energy output by using the following formula:
E = A * r * H * PR
E = Energy (kWh)
A = Total solar panel Area (m²)
r = Solar panel efficiency (%)
H = Annual global radiation at collector plane
PR = Performance ratio, coefficient for losses (range between 0.50 and 0.95)
Performance ratio is a quantity which represents the ratio of the effectively produced (used) energy to the energy which would be produced by a “perfect”
system continuously operating at standard test condition under the same radiation, taking into account losses such as array losses (shadings, incident angle modifier,
photovoltaic conversion, module quality, mismatch and wiring) and system losses (inverter efficiency, transformer efficiency and transmission losses).
The calculation of the estimated annual energy output also takes into account the total rated capacity of all the solar panels to be installed for the remaining
life of the PPA, net of the annual estimated decrease in rated capacity based on technology installed. The decrease in rated capacity includes various losses caused
by soiling, temperature changes, inverter and transformer inefficiency, incidence angle, wire, shading and mismatch losses. The technology used for each project is
assessed based on geographical conditions of the project, cost economics and the availability of such technology for construction. We assume an annual decrease in
rated capacity ranging from 0.5% to 0.7% depending on the technology used, which is based on the specifications given by the manufacturer of the solar panels.
To calculate nominal contracted payments for committed projects, we assume a 50% probability of achieving the generation numbers projected by the power
generation software, which is net of the annual estimated decrease in rated capacity based on the technology installed. For operating projects, instead of the formula
described above, we use the actual full year energy generated net of the annual estimated decrease in rated capacity based on the technology installed. We have
used this method of calculation since the inception of all projects, including scheduled price changes where applicable.
If we were to receive government grants under any PPA, such grants would be included as nominal contracted payments in the period when received. We
account for VGF as an income-type government grant. The proceeds received from VGF grants upon fulfilment of certain conditions are initially recorded as
deferred revenue. This deferred VGF revenue is recognized as sale of power in proportion to (x) the actual sale of solar energy kilowatts during the period to (y) the
total estimated sale of solar energy kilowatts during the tenure of the applicable PPA (as described in Note 2(r) to our consolidated financial statements) pursuant to
our revenue recognition policy.
Nominal contracted payments is a forward-looking number and we use judgment in developing the assumptions used to calculate it. Those assumptions may
not prove to be accurate over time. Underperformance of the solar power plants, payment defaults by our customers or other factors described under the heading
“Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors” could cause our actual results to differ materially from our calculation of nominal contracted payments.
57
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth, with respect to our PPAs, the aggregate nominal contracted payments and total estimated energy output as of the reporting
dates. These nominal contracted payments have not been discounted to arrive at the present value.
Nominal contracted payments (in thousands)
Total estimated energy output (kilowatt hours in millions)
As of March 31,
2016
INR
2017
INR
US$
207,576,237
255,474,775
3,939,472
As of March 31,
2016
34,671
2017
44,677
Nominal contracted payments increased from March 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017 as a result of entering into additional PPAs. Over time, we have seen a trend
towards a decline in the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission benchmark tariff for solar power procurement. For fiscal year 2011, the Central Electricity
Regulatory Commission benchmark tariff for solar power procurement was INR 17.91 per kilowatt hour. It was reduced to INR 10.39 per kilowatt hour for fiscal
year 2013, which was further reduced to INR 7.72 per kilowatt hour for fiscal year 2015 and INR 5.68 per kilowatt hour for fiscal year 2016. The overall trend of
solar power tariffs is that the tariffs are declining in line with the solar module prices.
Portfolio Run-Rate
Portfolio run-rate equals our annualized payments from customers extrapolated based on the operating and committed capacity as of the reporting date. In
estimating the portfolio run-rate, we multiply the PPA contract price per kilowatt hour by the estimated annual energy output for all operating and committed solar
projects as of the reporting date. The estimated annual energy output of our solar projects is calculated using power generation simulation software and validated by
independent engineering firms. The main assumption used in the calculation is the project location, which enables the software to derive the estimated annual
energy output from certain metrological data, including the temperature, wind speed and solar radiation based on the project location. Our power generation
simulation software calculates the estimated annual energy output by using the formula described above.
The calculation of the estimated annual energy output also takes into account the total rated capacity of all the solar panels to be installed for the remaining
life of the PPA, net of the annual estimated decrease in rated capacity based on technology installed. The decrease in rated capacity includes various losses caused
by soiling, temperature changes, inverter and transformer inefficiency, incidence angle, wire, shading and mismatch losses.
To calculate portfolio run-rate for committed projects, we assume a 50% probability of achieving the generation numbers projected by the power generation
software, which is net of the annual estimated decrease in rated capacity based on the technology installed. For operating projects, instead of the formula described
above, we use the actual full year energy generated net of the annual estimated decrease in rated capacity based on the technology installed. We have used this
method of calculation since the inception of all projects, including scheduled price changes where applicable.
Portfolio run-rate is a forward-looking number, and we use judgment in developing the assumptions used to calculate it. Those assumptions may not prove to
be accurate over time. Underperformance of the solar power plants or other factors described under the heading “Item 3. Key Information — D. Risk Factors”
could cause our actual results to differ materially from our calculation of portfolio run-rate.
58
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth, with respect to our PPAs, the aggregate portfolio run-rate and estimated annual energy output as of the reporting dates. The
portfolio run-rate has not been discounted to arrive at the present value.
Portfolio Revenue run-rate (in thousands)
Estimated annual energy output (kilowatt hours in millions)
2016
INR
9,289,641
As of March 31,
2017
INR
11,005,761
US$
169,711
As of March 31,
2016
1,514
2017
1,921
Portfolio run-rate increased from March 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017 as a result of the increase in operational and committed capacity during the period.
Components of Results of Operations
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue consists of solar energy sold to customers under long term PPAs, which generally have a term of 25 years. We have one customer for each
solar power plant. Our customers are power distribution companies and, to a lesser extent, commercial and industrial enterprises.
We recognize revenue on a monthly basis based on the solar energy kilowatts actually supplied to our customers multiplied by the rate per kilowatt hour
agreed to in the respective PPA. The solar energy kilowatts hours supplied during a month are validated by the customer prior to our billing and recognition of
revenue.
Where PPAs include scheduled price changes, revenue is recognized by applying the average rate to the energy output estimated over the term of the PPA.
We estimate the total kilowatt hour units expected to be generated annually during the tenure of PPA using budgeted plant load factors, rated capacity of the project
and annual estimated decrease in rated capability of solar panels. The contractual rates are applied to this annual estimate to determine the total estimated revenue
over the term of the PPA. We then use the total estimated revenue and the total estimated kilowatt hours to compute the average rate used to record revenue on the
actual energy output supplied. We compare the actual energy supplied to the estimate of the energy expected to be generated over the remaining term of the PPA on
a periodic basis, but at least annually. Based on this evaluation, we reassess the energy output estimated over the remaining term of the PPA and adjust the revenue
recognized and deferred to date. Through March 31, 2017, the adjustments have not been significant. The difference between the actual billing and revenue
recognized is recorded as deferred revenue.
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, the electricity is delivered and collectability is
reasonably assured. Revenue from sale of power is recorded net of discounts which, to date, have not been significant.
Cost of Operations (Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization)
Our cost of operations primarily consists of expenses pertaining to operations and maintenance of our solar power plants. These expenses include payroll and
related costs for maintenance staff, plant maintenance, insurance, and, if applicable, lease costs.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses include payroll and related costs for corporate, finance and other support staff, including bonus and share based
compensation expense, professional fees and other corporate
59
Table of Contents
expenses. We anticipate that we will incur additional general and administrative costs, including headcount and expansion related costs, to support the growth in
our business as well as additional costs of being a public reporting company.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense is recognized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of our solar power plants and other assets.
Leasehold improvements related to solar power plants are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the underlying period of the PPA for that particular solar
power plant. Leasehold improvements related to office facilities are amortized over the shorter of the lease period or the estimated useful life. Freehold land is not
depreciated. Construction in progress is not depreciated until such projects are commissioned.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net consists of interest incurred on term loans for projects under our fixed and variable rate financing arrangements and for the period prior
to our initial public offering, interest on compulsorily convertible debentures. It also included the deemed interest expense which was payable in the form of a
guaranteed return on the compulsorily convertible debentures and the Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares which were classified as a
liability and were converted to shares simultaneous to our initial public offering. Interest expense also includes bank fees and other borrowing costs, which are
typically amortized over the life of the loan using the effective interest rate method. Interest expense is presented net of capitalized financing costs and interest
income earned from bank deposits. Interest incurred in connection with a project that has been commissioned is expensed while interest incurred prior to
commissioning is capitalized.
Gain/Loss on Foreign Currency Exchange
We are exposed to movements in currency exchange rates, particularly to changes in exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Indian rupees. While our
functional currency is the U.S. dollar, the functional currency of AZI is Indian rupees and a portion of AZI’s borrowings from financial institutions are
denominated in U.S. dollars. Foreign exchange gain/loss includes the unrealized and realized loss from foreign currency fluctuations on our non-functional
currency denominated borrowings.
We also enter into foreign currency option contracts to mitigate and manage the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates on our borrowings denominated in
currencies other than our functional currency. These hedges do not qualify as cash flow hedges under Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 815,
“Derivatives and Hedging.” Changes in the fair value of these option contracts are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and are included in loss
on foreign currency exchange.
Income Tax Expense
Our income tax expense consists of current and deferred income tax as per applicable jurisdictions in Mauritius, India and the United States. Income tax for
our current and prior periods is measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to taxation authorities based on our taxable income or loss for that
period.
Deferred income taxes and changes in related valuation allowance, if any, reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts
of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As a company with less than US$1.07 billion in revenue for our last fiscal year, we qualify as an emerging growth company pursuant to the Jumpstart Our
Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. An emerging
60
Table of Contents
growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These
provisions include exemption from the auditor attestation requirement under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in the assessment of the emerging
growth company’s internal control over financial reporting. The JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company does not need to comply with any new
or revised financial accounting standards until such date that a private company is otherwise required to comply with such new or revised accounting standards. We
may adopt new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standard is required.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We have identified certain accounting policies that we believe are the
most critical to the presentation of our consolidated financial information over a period of time. These accounting policies may require our management to take
decisions on subjective and/or complex matters relating to reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs, expenses and related disclosures. These would
further lead us to estimate the effect of matters that may inherently be uncertain.
The judgment on such estimates and underlying assumptions is based on our experience, historical trends, understanding of the business, industry and
various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These form the basis of our judgment on matters that may not be apparent from other
available sources of information. In many instances changes in the accounting estimates are likely to occur from period-to-period. Actual results may differ from
the estimates. The future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be affected to the extent that the actual
results differ materially from our estimates.
Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements
included in this annual report. Our various critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in the following paragraphs.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense consists of (i) current income tax expense arising from income from operations (ii) deferred income tax expense/(benefit) arising from
temporary differences and (iii) income tax expense/(benefits) as a result of certain intercompany transactions.
We use the asset and liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
the difference between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when
the differences are expected to reverse.
The tax rates on reversal of temporary differences might be different from the tax rates used for creation of the respective deferred tax assets/liabilities.
As of March 31, 2016 and 2017, we had net deferred tax assets of INR 34.7 million and INR 31.4 million (US$0.5 million), respectively, and net deferred tax
liabilities of INR 470.0 million and INR 1,078.3 million (US$16.6 million), respectively.
We apply a two-step approach to recognize and measure uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting
for
Uncertainty
in
Income
Taxes
— an interpretation of ASC Topic 740. The first step is to evaluate the tax
position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit,
including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50%
likely of being realized
61
Table of Contents
upon ultimate settlement. We re-evaluate these uncertain tax positions on an annual basis. This evaluation is based on factors including changes in facts or
circumstances, changes in tax law and effectively settled issues under tax-audit. Such a change in recognition or measurement could result in the recognition of a
tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision in the relevant period. As of March 31, 2016 and 2017, we did not have any material uncertain tax positions.
We establish valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be
realized.
A portion of our Indian operations qualifies for tax holiday related to their operating income attributable to undertakings, as defined, in operating solar power
plants under section 80-IA of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. This holiday is available for a period of ten consecutive years out of fifteen years beginning from
the year in which the undertaking first generates power (referred to as the Tax Holiday period), however, the exemption is available only to the projects completed
on or before March 31, 2017. We assess the election of the Tax Holiday period on an annual basis for each of our undertakings. We believe these undertakings will
generate higher taxable profits due to lower interest cost as debt balances are paid down in the later years of operations and therefore we plan to defer the Tax
Holiday election to later years in order to maximize the benefits. As of March 31, 2017, we are claiming tax holiday benefits for three of our subsidiaries. Deferred
tax assets are recognized to the extent probable of realization outside the anticipated Tax Holiday period. For example, if we choose years six through 15 as the tax
holiday period, we recognize deferred tax assets only to the extent that they will be realized either in years one through five or from year 16 onwards. As a result,
all temporary differences do not result in creation of a deferred tax asset or liability.
AZI and a subsidiary provide EPC services to other group subsidiaries and as a result incur income taxes on profits from the services provided. The services
provided to the group subsidiaries are in the nature of capitalizable costs and are therefore capitalized as part of property, plant and equipment in the standalone
financial statements of such subsidiaries. However, these capitalized costs are eliminated for the purposes of the consolidated financial statements. The costs
capitalized in the standalone financial statements are however eligible for income tax deductions in the tax records of the respective group subsidiaries. We
recognize a portion of income taxes incurred by AZI and the subsidiary providing such services as prepaid income taxes to the extent we will be able to realize the
benefit derived from tax deductions availed by the other subsidiaries. We assess that the probability of realizing the benefit on an annual basis and its recognition is
limited to the extent probable of realization outside of the anticipated Tax Holiday period. Our estimate is that such benefit is limited to approximately 30% to 55%
of the tax expense incurred by AZI and the subsidiary. Prepaid income taxes are expensed in the statement of operations in the period the benefit is actually realized
by the other group subsidiaries. As a result, while all the profits on inter-company transactions are eliminated during consolidation, it does not result in complete
reversal of tax expense on such inter-company transactions. Accordingly, while we have never been profitable, we report income tax expenses that fluctuate over
the period.
Share Based Compensation
In connection with our initial offering, the stock options granted to the employees have been cancelled at the AZI level and reissued at the Azure Power
Global Limited level. For cancellation of the AZI plan, no additional considerations were paid or received from employees. There was no change in the Azure
Power Global Limited plan of the employees in the number of options granted to the employees or the exercise price. The options under the Azure Power Global
Limited plan were considered as immediate vesting, except for four of the employees.
We account for share options granted to our employees in accordance with ASC Topic 718 — Stock
Compensation
. Under the fair value recognition
provision of such guidance, compensation for share options granted is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the options, and is recognized as
expense over the vesting period of the option.
62
Table of Contents
Share based compensation expense is recorded net of estimated forfeitures in our consolidated statement of operations under general and administrative
expenses and is recorded for only those share options that we expect to vest. These share options have been granted to the employees who are in the corporate or
finance department and to other support staff. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical forfeitures of share options and adjust the rate to reflect changes in
facts and circumstances. We revise our estimated forfeiture rate if actual forfeitures differ from our initial estimates.
Determining the fair value of share options requires significant judgment. We estimated the fair value of our share options using the Black-Scholes valuation
model for awards with service vesting conditions and the Lattice valuation model for awards vesting based on achievement of market conditions. These models
require inputs such as the fair value of our equity shares, risk-free interest rate, expected dividend yield, expected term and expected volatility and we have applied
these inputs in determining the fair value of the share options as follows:
•
•
•
•
•
Fair value of our equity shares — we have valued our business on the date of each option grant for the grants issued prior to our initial public offering.
Grants issued subsequent to our initial public offering are valued based on the closing equity share price on the date of grant.
Risk free interest rate — the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield on Indian treasury bonds prior to IPO and US treasury bond post IPO, the date
of grant with the tenor matching the remaining term of the share options.
Expected dividend yield — we have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our equity shares and do not presently plan to pay cash dividends in
the foreseeable future. Consequently, we used an expected dividend yield of zero.
Expected term — the expected term was estimated based on the average between the vesting period and the plan term.
Expected volatility — as we have a limited trading history for our equity shares, the expected volatility for our equity shares was estimated by taking
the average historical price volatility for companies with similar lines of business based on the price fluctuations of their shares over a period
equivalent to the expected term of the share options granted. Companies with similar lines of business consist of several public companies similar in
size, which are engaged in similar business sectors in India and worldwide. We have considered a three-year average to be a reasonable estimate of
volatility for the purpose of valuation. The volatility is unlevered and then re-levered to adjust for our capital structure. We intend to continue to
consistently apply this process using the same or similar public companies until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of
our own equity share price becomes available, or unless circumstances change such that the identified companies are no longer similar to us, in which
case, more suitable companies whose share prices are publicly available would be utilized in the calculation.
The following table presents the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options granted during the periods presented:
Dividend yield
Expected term (in years)
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Fiscal Year Ended
March 31,
2016
0.0%
5.0-6.8
37.2%-41.6%
7.60%-8.08%
2017
0.0%
4.5-7.2
31.0%-41.7%
2.15%-7.61%
Share based compensation included in general and administrative expenses totaled INR 51.7 million and INR 12.1 million (US$0.2 million), for the fiscal
years ended March 31, 2016 and 2017. As of March 31, 2017, we had INR 9.0 million (US$0.1 million) of unrecognized compensation expense which will be
recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period of one year.
63
Table of Contents
A. Results of Operations
Azure Power Global Limited’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar and reporting currency is the Indian rupee. Solely for the convenience of the reader, we
have translated the financial information for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The rate used for this translation is INR 64.85 to US$1.00, which is the noon
buying rate in New York City for cable transfer in non-U.S. dollar currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as of
March 31, 2017, which is the date of our last reported financial statements. No representation is made that the Indian rupee amounts could have been, or could be,
converted, realized or settled into U.S. dollars at that rate.
Consolidated Statement of Operations data:
Operating revenues:
Sale of power
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of operations (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
General and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating costs and expenses:
Operating income
Other expense:
Interest expense, net
Loss (gain) on foreign currency exchange, net
Total other expenses
Loss before income tax
Income tax expense
Net loss
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
Net loss attributable to APGL
Accretion to Mezzanine CCPS
Accretion to redeemable non-controlling interest
Net loss attributable to APGL equity shareholders
Net loss per share attributable to APGL equity stockholders
Basic and diluted
Shares used in computing basic and diluted per share amounts:
Weighted average shares
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016
Operating Revenue
Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2015
(INR)
2016
(INR)
2017
(INR)
2017
(US$)
(in thousands)
1,124,138
2,626,148
4,182,985
64,502
79,816
425,952
322,430
828,198
295,940
190,648
672,841
687,781
1,551,270
1,074,878
375,787
797,161
1,046,565
2,219,513
1,963,472
5,795
12,292
16,138
34,225
30,277
831,790
299,628
1,131,418
(835,478)
(253,112)
(1,088,590)
(5,595)
(1,082,995)
(755,207)
—
(1,838,202)
2,058,836
343,137
2,401,973
(1,327,095)
(327,745)
(1,654,840)
(4,651)
(1,650,189)
(1,347,923)
(29,825)
(3,027,937)
2,371,836
(109,128)
2,262,708
(299,236)
(892,333)
(1,191,569)
(18,924)
(1,172,645)
(235,853)
(44,073)
(1,452,571)
36,574
(1,683)
34,891
(4,614)
(13,760)
(18,374)
(292)
(18,082)
(3,637)
(680)
(22,399)
(1,046)
(1,722)
(111)
(1.72)
1,758,080
1,758,080 13,040,618
—
Operating revenues during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 increased by INR 1,556.8 million, or 59%, to INR 4,183.0 million (US$64.5 million)
compared to fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The principal reasons for the increase in revenue during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 was the incremental
revenue from projects that commenced operations at various dates during fiscal year 2016. These include Andhra Pradesh 1, Punjab 3 and Karnataka 2 solar power
projects, which commenced operations during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 and contributed incremental operating revenue of INR 480.3 million, INR
250.7 million and
64
Table of Contents
INR 112.1 million, respectively. Rajasthan 4 project, which commenced operations in the third quarter of fiscal year 2016 and contributed incremental operating
revenue of INR 35.8 million, the Rajasthan 3 and Chhattisgarh 1 solar power projects, which commenced operations in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016, and
contributed incremental operating revenue of INR 189.6 million and 95.2 million, respectively. In addition, incremental revenue from projects that commenced
operations in fiscal year 2017 include, Punjab Rooftop 2 project which commenced operations in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 and contributed incremental
operating revenue of INR 68.8 million, Bihar 1 project which commenced operations in the second quarter of fiscal year 2017 and contributed incremental
operating revenue of INR 68.5 million and the Punjab 4 project which commenced operations in the third quarter of fiscal year 2017 and contributed incremental
operating revenue of INR 262.4 million.
Cost of Operations (Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization)
Cost of operations during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 increased by INR 185.1 million, or 97%, to INR 375.8 million (US$5.8 million) compared to
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to increase in plant maintenance cost related to newly operational projects by INR
141.9 million and an increase in leasehold rent of INR 36.8 million primarily resulting from increased leased land in connection with our projects during the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2017.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 increased by INR 124.3 million, or 18%, to INR 797.2 million
(US$12.3 million) compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. This was primarily due to increased travel and business development expenses for new solar
power projects of INR 23.6 million, payroll cost of INR 52.7 million, resulting from new hiring and an increase of INR 48.0 million primarily resulting from office
rent and related infrastructure costs as the scale of our business has expanded.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 increased by INR 358.8 million, or 52%, to INR 1,046.6 million
(US$16.1 million) compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The principal reason for the increase in depreciation was the full year effect of projects that
commenced operations on various dates during fiscal year 2016. These projects include Punjab 3, Karnataka 2 and Andhra Pradesh 1 solar power projects, which
commenced operation in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 and resulted in additional depreciation of INR 48.3 million, INR 23.7 million and INR 117.5 million,
respectively, Rajasthan 4 solar power project, which commenced operation in the third quarter of fiscal year 2016 and resulted in additional depreciation of
INR 7.7 million, Chhattisgarh 1 solar power project, which commenced operation in phases in the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2016 and resulted in
additional depreciation of INR 18.0 million and Rajasthan 3 solar power project, which commenced operation in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016 and resulted in
additional depreciation of INR 19.7 million.
In addition, we recorded depreciation and amortization expenses for projects that commenced operations during fiscal year end 2017. The projects include
Punjab rooftop 2 solar power project, which commenced operation in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 and resulted in additional depreciation of
INR 20.6 million, Bihar 1 solar power project, which commenced operation in the second quarter of fiscal year 2017 and resulted in additional depreciation of
INR 16.7 million and Punjab 4 solar power project, which commenced operation in the third quarter of fiscal year 2017 and resulted in additional depreciation of
INR 67.0 million.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 increased by INR 313.0 million, or 15%, to INR 2,371.8 million (US$36.6 million)
compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.
65
Table of Contents
Interest expense during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 increased by INR 438.2 million, or 19%, to INR 2,764.0 million (US$42.6 million). Interest
expense increased primarily as a result of interest expenses of INR 891.7 million on borrowings for the Punjab 3, Andhra Pradesh 1, Karnataka 2, Punjab rooftop 2,
Bihar 1 and Punjab 4 solar power projects operating during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. This was offset by a reduction in interest expense on
compulsorily convertible instruments of INR 507.6 million which converted to shares simultaneous to our initial public offering.
Interest income during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 increased by INR 125.2 million or 47%, to INR 392.2 million (US$6.0 million) compared to the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 primarily as a result of an increase in income on term deposits placed during the period of INR 98.3 million and increase in gain
on sale of short term investments by INR 26.7 million.
Loss (Gain) on Foreign Currency Exchange
Foreign exchange loss during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 improved by INR 452.3 million to a gain of INR 109.1 million (US$1.7 million)
compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The closing exchange rate of Indian rupees appreciated against the U.S. dollar from INR 66.25 to US$1.00 as of
March 31, 2016 to INR 64.85 to US$1.00 as of March 31, 2017. This appreciation of the Indian rupee resulted in an improvement in unrealized and realized foreign
exchange gains of INR 465.2 million and INR 25.8 million, on our foreign currency denominated debt and a decrease in unrealized and realized foreign exchange
gain of INR 50.8 million and INR 49.5 million, on our derivative instruments, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. There was an
additional gain on foreign currency exchange of INR 61.5 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 on account of a reinstatement of amount payable to
vendors.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 by INR 564.6 million to INR 892.3 million (US$13.8 million), compared to the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2016.
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, the statutory income tax rate as per the Income Tax Act, 1961 is 34.61%. The current income tax liability for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 was INR 509.0 million from INR 28.7 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. The increase in the effective income tax
in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 was a result of higher taxable profits generated by AZI in the current period. We pay taxes on taxable profits at the
individual entity level, in accordance with the tax rates in the relevant jurisdictions. While at the consolidated level, we have never been profitable, AZI and certain
Indian and non-Indian subsidiaries at the individual entity level have generated taxable profits. These taxable profits result from services provided by these entities
to other subsidiaries and are taxed at the applicable tax rates in the jurisdiction of the entity providing the services. These inter-company transactions and profits are
eliminated during consolidation, while the related income tax expense is not eliminated. Furthermore, a portion of our Indian operations qualifies for a tax holiday
related to their operating income attributable to undertakings, as defined, in operating solar power plants under section 80-IA of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961.
This holiday is available for a period of ten consecutive years out of 15 years beginning from the year in which the undertaking first generates power (referred to as
the tax holiday period), however, the exemption is available only to the projects completed on or before March 31, 2017. We anticipate that we will claim the
aforesaid deduction in the last ten years out of 15 years beginning with the year in which we generate power and when we have taxable income. Accordingly, our
current operations are taxable at the normally applicable tax rates. Due to the tax holiday period, a substantial portion of the temporary differences between the
book and tax basis of our assets and liabilities do not have any tax consequences as they are expected to reverse within the tax holiday period.
The increase in our income tax expense was largely attributable to taxable profits generated by AZI. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, we
recorded a Indian deferred tax expense of INR 383.2 million, whereas for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, we recorded a Indian deferred tax expense of
INR 299.1 million. The
66
Table of Contents
primary reason for the change in the level of domestic deferred tax asset was due to higher temporary differences reversing in the tax holiday period.
Our tax expenses are further described in Note 11 — Income Taxes to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.
Year Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2015
Operating Revenue
Operating revenues during the year ended March 31, 2016 increased by INR 1,502.0 million, or 134%, to INR 2,626.1 million (US$40.5 million) compared
to the same period in 2015. The principal reasons for the increase in revenue during the year ended March 31, 2016 was the operation of the Uttar Pradesh 1,
Punjab 2 and Karnataka 1 solar power projects, which commenced operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015 and contributed incremental operating
revenue of INR 103.4 million, INR 223.1 million and INR 87.6 million, respectively, the operation of the Rajasthan 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 solar power projects and
Chhattisgarh 1 project, which commenced operations in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016, and contributed incremental operating revenue of INR 158.8 million,
INR 325.9 million and INR 337.1 million and 200.1 million, respectively. In addition, Rajasthan 4 project commenced operations in the third quarter of fiscal year
2016 and contributed incremental operating revenue of INR 14.9 million and the Punjab 3 project commenced operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016
and contributed incremental operating revenue of INR 59.7 million.
Cost of Operations (Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization)
Cost of operations during the year ended March 31, 2016 increased by INR 110.8 million, or 139%, to INR 190.6 million (US$2.9 million) compared to the
same period in 2015. The increase was primarily due to increase in plant maintenance cost related to newly operational projects by INR 92.4 million and an
increase in leasehold rent of INR 18.4 million primarily resulting from increased leased land in connection with our projects during the year ended March 31, 2016.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses during the year ended March 31, 2016 increased by INR 246.9 million, or 58%, to INR 672.8 million (US$10.4 million)
compared to the same period in 2015. This was primarily due to increased professional expenses of INR 86.8 million, which related to professional fees paid for
raising capital, travel and business development expenses for new solar power projects of INR 22.3 million, payroll cost of INR 91.7 million, which primarily
resulted from new hiring and modification of the stock option plan, increased overheads of INR 13.4 million which primarily resulted from office rent and related
infrastructure costs as the scale of our business has expanded and an incremental provision for doubtful debt of INR 32.7 million created in this period.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses during the year ended March 31, 2016 increased by INR 365.4 million, or 113%, to INR 687.8 million
(US$10.6 million) compared to the same period in 2015. The principal reason for the increase in depreciation was the capitalization of the Punjab 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3
projects, which commenced operation in phases from September 2014 through October 2014 and accounted for additional depreciation of INR 38.6 million, Uttar
Pradesh 1 and Karnataka 1 projects, which commenced operation in January 2015 and accounted for additional depreciation of INR 37.0 million, Rajasthan 3.1, 3.2
and 3.3 solar power projects, which commenced operation in phases from April 2015 through May 2015 and resulted in additional depreciation of
INR 224.6 million, Chhattisgarh 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 solar power projects, which commenced operation in phases from May 2015 through August 2015 and resulted in
additional depreciation of
67
Table of Contents
INR 47.1 million, Rajasthan 4 solar power project, which commenced operation in November 2015 and resulted in additional depreciation of INR 4.6 million and
Punjab 3 solar power project, which commenced operation in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 and resulted in additional depreciation of INR 11.5 million.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense during the year ended March 31, 2016 increased by INR 1,227.0 million, or 148%, to INR 2,058.8 million (US$31.7 million) compared
to the same period in 2015. Interest expense during the year ended March 31, 2016 increased by INR 1,326.1 million, or 133%, to INR 2,325.8 million
(US$35.9 million). Interest expense increased primarily as a result of interest expenses of INR 938.2 million on borrowings for the Punjab 2, Uttar Pradesh 1 and
Karnataka 1 solar power projects operating during the year ended March 31, 2016 and Rajasthan 3 and Chhattisgarh 1 solar power project operating in phases
starting from April 2015 and INR 326.5 million due to the change in the fair value of our compulsorily convertible instruments and our Series E and G
compulsorily convertible preferred shares being classified as liability.
Interest income during the year ended March 31, 2016 increased by INR 99.1 million or 59%, to INR 266.9 million (US$4.1 million) compared to the same
period in 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in income on term deposits placed during the period of INR 69.7 million and increase in gain on sale of short
term investments by INR 31.4 million.
Loss on Foreign Currency Exchange
Foreign exchange loss during the year ended March 31, 2016 increased by INR 43.5 million to INR 343.1 million (US$5.3 million) compared to the same
period in 2015.
The closing exchange rate of Indian rupees depreciated against the U.S. dollar from INR 62.31 to US$1.00 as of March 31, 2015 to INR 66.25 to US$1.00 as
of March 31, 2016. This depreciation of the Indian rupee resulted in an increase in unrealized foreign exchange losses of INR 97.6 million on our foreign currency
denominated debt and an increase in unrealized foreign exchange loss of INR 3.7 million on our derivative instruments. These foreign exchange losses were
partially offset by an increase in realized gains of INR 38.3 million on our foreign currency denominated debt and an increase in realized gains of INR 19.6 million
on our foreign currency option contracts.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased during the year ended March 31, 2016 by INR 74.6 million to INR 327.7 million (US$5.1 million), compared to the same
period in 2015.
Our effective income tax rate for the year ended March 31, 2016 was 24.7% as compared to 30.3% for the same period in 2015. The decrease in the effective
income tax rate in the year ended March 31, 2016 was a result of lower taxable profits generated by AZI in the current period which provides certain engineering,
procurement and construction services to its Indian subsidiaries.
The change in our income tax expense was largely attributable to an increase in our deferred tax expense. During the year ended March 31, 2016, we
recorded a Indian deferred tax expense of INR 299.1 million, whereas for the year ended March 31, 2015, we recorded a Indian deferred tax expense of
INR 61.1 million. The primary reason for the change in the level of domestic deferred tax asset was due to higher temporary differences reversing in the tax holiday
period.
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our holding company does not generate cash from operations in order to fund its expenses. Restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay us cash
dividends as a result of certain regulatory and contractual restrictions
68
Table of Contents
may make it impracticable to use such dividends as a means of funding the expenses of Azure Power Global Limited. For a further discussion on our ability to issue
and receive dividends, see “Item 8. Financial Information — A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information”
Our principal liquidity requirements are to finance current operations, service our debt and support our growth in India. We will continue to use capital in the
future to finance the construction of solar power plants. Historically, our operations largely relied on project-level long term borrowings, proceeds from issuance of
compulsorily convertible preferred shares and compulsorily convertible debentures, and internally generated cash flows to meet capital expenditure requirements.
As a normal part of our business and depending on market conditions, we will from time to time consider opportunities to repay, redeem, repurchase or refinance
our indebtedness. Changes in our operating plans, lower than anticipated electricity sales, increased expenses or other events may cause us to seek additional debt
or financing in future periods. There can be no guarantee that financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all. Debt financing, if available, could impose
additional cash payment obligations, additional covenants and operating restrictions. Future financings could result in the dilution of our existing shareholding. In
addition, any of the items discussed in detail under “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this annual report may also significantly impact our liquidity.
Liquidity Position
As of March 31, 2017, our liquid assets totaled INR 8,757.5 million (US$135.0 million), which was comprised of cash and current investments available for
sale securities. As of March 31, 2017, we carried cash and short term investments of INR 8,508.7 million (US$131.2 million) held by our foreign subsidiaries,
which are not readily available to Azure Power Global Limited.
We also have commitments from financial institutions that we can draw upon in the future upon the achievement of specific funding criteria. As of
March 31, 2017, we have such undrawn commitments amounting to INR 16,227.9 million (US$250.2 million) under project-level financing arrangements, all
which have a floating interest rate:
We have a term loan from IDBI Bank for the Bihar 1 project for an aggregate principal amount of INR 514.5 million (US$7.9 million) of which
INR 51.5 million (US$0.8 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 12.00% and is secured by movable and immovable assets of the
project. The term of this loan is 15 years. Cash distribution from the project can be made after meeting the project expenses and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd. for the Punjab Rooftop 2 project for an aggregate principal amount of
INR 449.5 million (US$6.9 million), of which INR 74.5 million (US$1.1 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 10.75% and is
secured by movable and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 10 years. Cash distribution from the project can be made after meeting the project
expenses and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services (IL&FS) for the Andhra Pradesh 2 project for an aggregate principal amount of
INR 3,730.0 million (US$57.5 million) of which INR 2,230.0 million (US$34.4 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 12.00% and
is secured by movable and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 14 years. Cash distribution from the project can be made after meeting the
project expenses and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from IDBI Bank for the Andhra Pradesh 2 project for an aggregate principal amount of INR 2,000.0 million (US$30.8 million) of which
INR 1,200.0 million (US$18.5 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 10.75% and is secured by movable and immovable assets of
the project. The term of this loan is 19 years. Cash distribution from the project can be made after meeting the project expenses and debt service requirements.
69
Table of Contents
We have a term loan from Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd. for the Rajasthan 4 project for an aggregate principal amount of
INR 256.6 million (US$4.0 million), of which INR 6.6 million (US$0.1 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 11.40% and is
secured by movable and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 13.5 years. Cash distribution from the project can be made after meeting the
project expenses and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from International Finance Corporation for the Karnataka 3 project for an aggregate principal amount of INR 1,993.0 million
(US$30.7 million), of which INR 1,133.4 million (US$17.5 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 11.42% and is secured by
movable and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 15 years. Cash distribution from the project can be made after meeting the project expenses
and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from Rural Electrification Corporation for the Karnataka 3 projects for an aggregate principal amount of INR 1,993.0 million
(US$30.7 million), of which INR 1,222.6 million (US$18.9 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 10.35% and is secured by
movable and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 15 years. Cash distribution from the projects can be made after meeting the project expenses
and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited for the Karnataka 3 projects for an aggregate principal amount of
INR 1,540.0 million (US$23.7 million), of which INR 946.8 million (US$14.6 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 10.35% and
is secured by movable and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 15 years. Cash distribution from the projects can be made after meeting the
project expenses and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from PTC India Financial Services Limited for the Karnataka 3 projects for an aggregate principal amount of INR 1,000.0 million
(US$15.4 million), of which INR 614.4 million (US$9.5 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 11.75% and is secured by movable
and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 17 years. Cash distribution from the projects can be made after meeting the project expenses and debt
service requirements.
We have a term loan from PTC India Financial Services Limited for the Uttar Pradesh 2 project for an aggregate principal amount of INR 2,300.0 million
(US$35.5 million), of which INR 1,475.0 million (US$22.7 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 11.00% and is secured by
movable and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 18 years. Cash distribution from the projects can be made after meeting the project expenses
and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from PTC India Financial Services Limited for the Andhra Pradesh 3 project for an aggregate principal amount of INR 2,100.0 million
(US$32.4 million), which was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 11.25% and is secured by movable and immovable assets of the project.
The term of this loan is 18 years. Cash distribution from the projects can be made after meeting the project expenses and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from IndusInd Bank for the Telangana 1 project for an aggregate principal amount of INR 4,610.0 million (US$71.1 million), of which
INR 3,610.0 million (US$55.7 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 10.90% and is secured by movable and immovable assets of
the project. The term of this loan is 20 years. Cash distribution from the projects can be made after meeting the project expenses and debt service requirements.
We have a term loan from IndusInd Bank for the Delhi Rooftop 4 project for an aggregate principal amount of INR 558.0 million (US$8.6 million), of which
INR 296.6 million (US$4.6 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 11.20% and is secured by movable and immovable assets of the
project. The term of this loan is 15 years. Cash distribution from the projects can be made after meeting the project expenses and debt service requirements.
70
Table of Contents
We have a term loan from PTC India Financial Services Limited for the Maharashtra 1 project for an aggregate principal amount of INR 375.0 million
(US$5.8 million), of which INR 18.8 million (US$0.3 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 11.25% and is secured by movable
and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 16 years. Cash distribution from the projects can be made after meeting the project expenses and debt
service requirements.
We have a term loan from Overseas Private Investment Corporation for rooftop projects for an aggregate principal amount of INR 1,296.8 million
(US$20.0 million), of which INR 1,247.7 million (US$19.2 million) was undrawn as of March 31, 2017. This loan bears interest at 4.42% and is secured by
movable and immovable assets of the project. The term of this loan is 15 years. Cash distribution from the projects can be made after meeting the project expenses
and debt service requirements.
Generally, under the terms of the loan agreements entered into by our project subsidiaries, the project subsidiaries are restricted from paying dividends to
AZI if they default in payment of their principal, interest and other amounts due to the lenders under their respective loan agreements. Certain of AZI’s project
subsidiaries also may not pay dividends to AZI out of restricted cash.
We are subject to business and operational risks that could adversely affect our cash flows. A material decrease in our cash flows would likely produce a
corresponding adverse effect on our borrowing capacity.
Sources of Liquidity
Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and other capital requirements will depend on our future operating performance which, in turn, will be
subject to general economic, financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. Our financing
arrangements as of March 31, 2017 consist of project financing arrangements and other borrowings.
Compulsorily Convertible Preferred Shares
Through December 31, 2016, we had raised funds totalling INR 9,381.3 million (US$144.7 million), net of related costs, through the issuance of Series A to
Series I compulsorily convertible preferred shares. Series A to Series D, Series F, Series H and Series I compulsorily convertible preferred shares had been
classified in temporary equity in our consolidated balance sheet because these preference shareholders had a right to convert their shares into a fixed number of
equity shares. Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares had been classified as a liability because Series E and Series G preference
shareholders have a right to convert their shares into a variable number of equity shares to give them their required returns.
All series of the compulsorily convertible preferred shares were convertible into equity shares either on the respective maturity date or on the occurrence of
specific events based on the terms of respective agreements. In addition, the Series A to D, Series F, Series H and Series I compulsorily convertible preference
shareholders had a right to convert into equity shares at any point from the date of the respective issuance. Pursuant to the initial public offering, Series A to D,
Series F, Series H and Series I compulsorily convertible preference shareholders were converted into equity shares and were issued 14,635,882 equity shares and
the Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preference shareholders were issued 1,286,598 equity shares. The Compulsorily Convertible Preferred Shares
were classified as Mezzanine CCPS in accordance with ASC Topic 480 and ASC Topic 815.
The Mezzanine CCPS were accreted to their buyback value through February 26, 2016, so that the carrying amount will equal the mandatory redemption at
each date. Subsequently, we entered into an agreement to extend the buyback date to December 31, 2016, without increasing the buyback value for the Mezzanine
CCPS. For Series H and Series I compulsorily convertible preferred shares, redemption value increased by 8% per annum and accretion has been undertaken until
October 12, 2016.
71
Table of Contents
The Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares were classified as a current liability, as of March 31, 2016, of INR 1,542.0 million
(US$23.8 million), as these instruments had a redemption date of December 31, 2016.
Compulsorily Convertible Debentures
The Company had raised funds through the issuance of compulsorily convertible debentures at coupon rates ranging from 0% to 10% and maturing on
various dates from December 2030 to June 2034. Until the date of the initial public offering in October 2016, the Company had raised funds totalling
INR 1,182.0 million (US$18.2 million), Pursuant to our initial offering, the debenture-holders were issued 1,826,305 such number of equity shares so as to provide
them a required return 18.4% per annum to 20.0% per annum.
Project-level Financing Arrangements
Our borrowings include project-specific financing arrangements collateralized by the underlying solar power plants. At March 31, 2017, these borrowings
had annual interest rates ranging from 4.07% to 6.43% for foreign currency loans and from 10.50% to 12.50% for Indian rupee term loans and 13.00% for short
term loans. The table below summarizes certain terms of our project-level financing arrangements as of March 31, 2017:
Name of Project
Punjab 1
Punjab 2
Gujarat 1
Gujarat rooftop
Rajasthan 1
Rajasthan 2
Uttar Pradesh 1
Rooftop Projects (2)
Karnataka 1
Rajasthan 3.1
Rajasthan 3.2
Rajasthan 3.3
Punjab 3.1 and 3.2
Rajasthan 4
Chhattisgarh 1.1,1.2 & 1.3
Bihar 1
Karnataka 2
Andhra Pradesh 1
Punjab Rooftop 2
Karnataka 3.2
Karnataka 3.3
Punjab 4
Delhi Rooftop 4
Maharashtra 1.1 & 1.2
Uttar Pradesh 2
Telangana 1
Andhra Pradesh 2
Andhra Pradesh 2 (Bridge Loan)
Oberoi Rooftop
Total
Outstanding Principal
Amount
INR
US$
(In thousands)
Type of
Interest
Currency
Maturity
Date (1)
202,671
1,696,500
1,122,926
114,417
783,162
3,339,329
495,550
217,064
543,114
902,132
1,712,099
1,845,640
1,544,800
236,252
1,505,260
448,350
538,100
2,562,300
375,000
1,293,472
1,315,371
5,981,800
261,400
356,250
825,000
1,000,000
2,300,000
2,500,000
49,077
36,067,036(3)
3,125
26,160
17,316
1,764
12,077
51,493
7,641
3,347
8,375
13,911
26,401
28,460
23,821
3,643
23,211
6,914
8,298
39,511
5,783
19,946
20,283
92,241
4,031
5,493
12,722
15,420
35,466
38,551
757
556,161
Fixed
Floating
Fixed
Floating
Fixed
Fixed
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
Floating
US$
INR
US$
INR
US$
US$
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
INR
2024
2030
2025
2028
2028
2031
2026
2028
2030
2028
2030
2028
2030
2028
2029
2031
2031
2034
2026
2031
2031
2034
2031
2032
2034
2036
2036
2018
2030
(1)
This represents the last repayment period. These loans are repayable on a quarterly or semi-annual basis. For repayment by period of the above-mentioned
loans, refer to contractual obligation and commercial commitments.
72
Table of Contents
(2)
(3)
Rooftop Projects includes DLF (total), Uttar Pradesh Rooftop 1, Delhi Rooftop 1, Delhi Rooftop 2 and Delhi Rooftop 3.
Excludes ancillary cost of borrowing of INR 909.3 million (US$14.0 million), presented in the financials on net basis.
Our outstanding project-level borrowings have been secured by certain movable and immovable properties, including property, plant and equipment, and in
three cases is also supported by personal guarantees issued by Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa (our chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer)
and Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa (our director and chief operating officer), as well as a pledge of the shares of the project-level SPVs.
The financing agreements governing our project-level borrowings contain financial and other restrictive covenants that limit our project subsidiaries’ ability
to make distributions to us unless certain specific conditions are met, including the satisfaction of certain financial ratios.
Uses of Liquidity
Our principal requirements for liquidity and capital resources can be categorized into investment for developing solar power plants and debt service
obligations. Generally, once operational, our solar power generation assets do not require significant capital expenditures to maintain their operating performance.
For principal and interest payments on our debt outstanding as of March 31, 2017, refer to Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments included
elsewhere in this annual report.
Capital Expenditures
As of March 31, 2017, we operated 32 utility scale projects and several commercial rooftop projects with a combined rated capacity of 651 MW. As of such
date, we were also constructing eight projects with a combined rated capacity of 354 MW and had an additional 64 MW of projects committed.
Our capital expenditure requirements consist of:
(i)
Expansion capital expenditures for new projects; and
(ii) Working capital spent for building a pipeline for coming year(s).
Expansion capital expenditures also include interest expense associated with borrowings used to fund expansion during the construction phase of the
projects.
Our capital expenditure amounted to INR 15,421.5 million (US$237.8 million) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, primarily, for the Punjab 4,
Karnataka 3, Bihar 1, Maharashtra 1, Delhi 3 and 4 rooftop, Oberoi rooftop and Punjab rooftop 2 projects.
Cash Flow Discussion
We use traditional measures of cash flow, including net cash provided by operating activities, net cash used in investing activities and net cash provided by
financing activities, as well as cash available for distribution to evaluate our periodic cash flow results.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits with banks, term deposits and all other highly liquid investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition and that are readily convertible to cash. It does not include restricted cash which consists of cash
balances restricted as to withdrawal or usage and relate to cash used to collateralize bank letters of credit supporting the purchase of equipment for solar power
plants, bank guarantees issued in relation to the construction of the solar power plants within the timelines stipulated in PPAs and for certain debt service reserves
required under our loan agreements.
73
Table of Contents
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016
The following table reflects the changes in cash flows for the comparative periods:
Cash flow data
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
Operating Activities
For fiscal year ended
March 31,
2016
INR
2017
INR
US$
(In thousands)
Change
INR
733,868
(9,159,046)
9,465,659
(27,190)
(21,944,262)
24,331,507
(421)
(338,385)
375,196
(761,058)
(12,785,216)
14,865,848
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, we utilized INR 27.2 million (US$0.4 million) of cash in operating activities. This cash outflow primarily
resulted from a net loss during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 of INR 1,191.6 million reduced by non-cash items including deferred income taxes of
INR 383.3 million, change in fair value of compulsorily convertible debentures, Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares of
INR 164.2 million, amortization of deferred finance costs of INR 114.1 million, and depreciation and amortization of INR 1,046.6 million, offset by realized and
unrealized foreign exchange gain, net of INR 109.1 million resulting from appreciation of the rupee, in addition to changes in operating assets and liabilities
including a INR 333.9 million increase in other liabilities, a INR 193.3 million increase in deferred revenue, a INR 63.2 million increase in interest payable, a
INR 18.9 million increase in accounts payable, offset by a INR 581.9 million increase in accounts receivable, a INR 344.6 million increase in other assets primarily
in connection with prepaid taxes, land use rights and interest receivable, and a INR 122.9 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily
resulting from options premiums paid in connection with our hedging activities, prepaid income taxes and debt financing cost and interest receivable on term
deposits.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, we generated INR 733.9 million (US$11.3 million) of cash in operating activities. This cash inflow primarily
resulted from a net loss during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 of INR 1,654.8 million reduced by non-cash items including deferred income taxes of
INR 299.1 million, change in fair value of compulsorily convertible debentures, Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares of
INR 671.8 million, depreciation and amortization of INR 687.8 million and realized and unrealized foreign exchange loss, net of INR 343.1 million resulting from
depreciation of the rupee, in addition to changes in operating assets and liabilities including a INR 126.8 million increase in accounts payable, a INR 952.6 million
increase in deferred revenue and a INR 70.2 million increase in interest payable offset by a INR 353.2 million increase in accounts receivable, a INR 325.4 million
increase in other assets primarily in connection with advances paid to suppliers and contractors and a INR 119.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and other
current assets primarily resulting from options premiums paid in connection with our hedging activities, prepaid income taxes and debt financing cost and interest
receivable on term deposits.
Investing Activities
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, we utilized INR 21,944.3 million (US$338.4 million) in our investing activities. This cash outflow was
primarily due to INR 15,421.5 million incurred to purchase property, plant and equipment primarily related to the construction of our Punjab 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 solar
power projects, Karnataka 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 solar power projects, Bihar 1 solar power project and Punjab rooftop 2 solar power project in addition to a net purchase
of INR 3,192.7 million of available-for-sale non-current investments and a net addition of INR 3,318.9 million to restricted cash, in the form of term deposit.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, we utilized INR 9,159.0 million (US$141.2 million) in our investing activities. This cash outflow was
primarily due to INR 9,097.0 million incurred to purchase property,
74
Table of Contents
plant and equipment primarily related to the construction of our Rajasthan 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 solar power projects, Chhattisgarh 1.1 and 1.2 solar power projects,
Punjab 3.1 and 3.2 solar power projects, Karnataka 1 solar power projects and Andhra Pradesh 1 solar power projects offset by a net sale of INR 50.7 million of
available-for-sale non-current investments. In addition, we raised cash amounting to INR 316.9 million from the sale of redeemable non-controlling interests.
Financing Activities
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, we generated INR 24,331.5 million (US$375.2 million) from financing activities. This cash inflow was
primarily due to new loan proceeds of INR 20,993.7 million in the form of term loans from banks for our Punjab 4, Karnataka 3, Andhra Pradesh 2, Uttar Pradesh
2, Telangana 1, Bihar1 and Punjab rooftop 2 solar power plants, INR 1,338.0 million from the contribution by non-controlling interest holders and INR
9,315.6 million proceeds from Series I compulsorily convertible preferred shares, initial public offering and concurrent private placement. These inflows were
offset in part by INR 6,373.2 million in repayment of loans, and INR 942.8 million incurred for the public issue.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, we generated INR 9,465.7 million (US$146.0 million) from financing activities. This cash inflow was
primarily due to new loan proceeds of INR 8,727.9 million in the form of term loans from banks for our Rajasthan 3, Chhattisgarh 1, Punjab 3, Andhra Pradesh 1
and Rajasthan 4 solar power plants and INR 4,237.4 million proceeds from Series G and Series H compulsorily convertible preferred shares. These inflows were
offset in part by INR 3,490.8 million in repayment of loans.
Year Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2015
The following table reflects the changes in cash flows for the comparative periods:
Cash flow data
Net cash provided (used in) by operating activities
Net cash (used in) investing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
Operating Activities
For the Year Ended
March 31,
2015
INR
2016
INR
US$
(In thousands)
Change
INR
(176,680)
(9,050,994)
9,672,089
733,868
(9,159,046)
9,465,659
11,316
(141,234)
145,962
910,548
(108,052)
(206,430)
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, we generated INR 733.9 million (US$11.3 million) of cash in operating activities. This cash inflow primarily
resulted from a net loss during the year ended March 31, 2016 of INR 1,654.8 million reduced by non-cash items including deferred income taxes of INR
299.1 million, change in fair value of compulsorily convertible debentures, Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares of INR 671.8 million,
depreciation and amortization of INR 687.8 million and realized and unrealized foreign exchange loss, net of INR 343.1 million resulting from depreciation of the
rupee, in addition to changes in operating assets and liabilities including a INR 126.8 million increase in accounts payable, a INR 952.6 million increase in deferred
revenue and a INR 70.2 million increase in interest payable offset by a INR 353.2 million increase in accounts receivable, a INR 325.4 million increase in other
assets primarily in connection with advances paid to suppliers and contractors and a INR 119.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets
primarily resulting from options premiums paid in connection with our hedging activities, prepaid income taxes and debt financing cost and interest receivable on
term deposits.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, we utilized INR 176.7 million (US$2.7 million) of cash in operating activities. This cash outflow primarily
resulted from a net loss during the year ended March 31, 2015
75
Table of Contents
of INR 1,088.6 million reduced by non-cash items including change in fair value of compulsorily convertible debentures and Series E compulsorily convertible
preferred shares of INR 286.3 million, depreciation and amortization of INR 322.4 million and realized and unrealized foreign exchange loss, net of INR
299.6 million resulting from depreciation of the rupee, in addition to changes in operating assets and liabilities including a INR 334.5 million increase in other
liabilities primarily in connection with obligations to suppliers and contractors, a INR 241.1 million increase in other assets primarily in connection with advances
paid to suppliers and contractors, and a INR 118.3 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily resulting from options premiums paid in
connection with our hedging activities, prepaid income taxes and debt financing cost and interest receivable on term deposits.
Investing Activities
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, we utilized INR 9,159.0 million (US$141.2 million) in our investing activities. This cash outflow was
primarily due to INR 9,097.0 million incurred to purchase property, plant and equipment primarily related to the construction of our Rajasthan 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 solar
power projects, Chhattisgarh 1.1 and 1.2 solar power projects, Punjab 3.1 and 3.2 solar power projects, Karnataka 1 solar power projects and Andhra Pradesh 1
solar power projects offset by a net sale of INR 45.4 million of available-for-sale non-current investments. In addition, we raised cash amounting to INR
316.9 million from the sale of redeemable non-controlling interests.
During the year ended March 31, 2015, we utilized INR 9,051.0 million (US$139.6 million) in investing activities. This cash outflow was primarily due to
INR 8,426.0 million incurred to purchase property, plant and equipment primarily related to the construction of our Punjab 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3, Uttar Pradesh 1 and
Karnataka 1 solar power projects and the purchase of term deposits for INR 624.5 million, offset in part by a net sale of INR 13.9 million of available-for-sale non-
current investments.
Financing Activities
During the year ended March 31, 2016, we generated INR 9,465.7 million (US$146.0 million) from financing activities. This cash inflow was primarily due
to new loan proceeds of INR 8,727.9 million in the form of term loans from banks for our Rajasthan 3, Chhattisgarh 1, Punjab 3, Andhra Pradesh 1 and Rajasthan 4
solar power plants and INR 4,237.4 million proceeds from Series G and Series H compulsorily convertible preferred shares. These inflows were offset in part by
INR 3,490.8 million in repayment of loans.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, we generated INR 9,672.1 million (US$149.1 million) of cash from our financing activities. This cash inflow
was primarily due to new loans with proceeds of INR 8,399.0 million in the form of term loans from banks for our Punjab 2, Uttar Pradesh 1 and Karnataka 1 solar
power projects, proceeds of INR 1,549.0 million through the issue of 138,333 shares of Series F compulsorily convertible preferred shares and INR 180.0 million
from the issuance of compulsorily convertible debentures. These inflows were offset in part by INR 452.9 million in repayment of loans during the year and INR
3.0 million of expenses incurred in connection with this offering.
C. Research and Development
Our intellectual property is an essential element of our business, and our success depends, at least in part, on our ability to protect our core technology and
intellectual property. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, trademark and other intellectual property laws, confidentiality
agreements and license agreements to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. As of March 31, 2017, we had four patent applications under process.
The patent applications include our real time and pre-paid solar power module, which enables automated services such as solar energy generation and provisioning,
maintenance and billing and our manual solar tracking system, which allows us to remotely control our solar panels to follow the movement of the sun. Other two
patent applications include a thin film photovoltaic mounting assembly and a network operation and control center that allows us to monitor project performance in
real time.
76
Table of Contents
D. Trend information
Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events since March 31, 2017
that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our net revenues, income, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that caused the disclosed
financial information to be not necessarily indicative of future operating results or financial conditions.
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The terms of our PPAs provide for the annual delivery of a minimum amount of electricity at fixed prices. Under the terms of the PPAs, we have issued
irrevocable performance bank guarantees totaling INR 1,534.7 million (US$23.7 million) as of March 31, 2017. We have also given guarantees as a part of the
bidding process for setting up of solar power plants amounting to INR 1,092.0 million (US$16.8 million) as of March 31, 2017. We are not party to any other off-
balance sheet arrangements.
F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
We have contractual obligations and other commercial commitments that represent prospective cash requirements. The following table summarizes our
outstanding contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of March 31, 2017.
Contractual cash obligations
Long-term debt (principal) (1)
Long-term debt (interest) (2)
Operating lease obligations
Purchase obligations (3)
Asset retirement obligations
Total contractual obligations (INR)
Total contractual obligations (US$)
Under 1
year
1-3
Years
Payment due by Period
3-5
Years
(in thousands)
Over 5
years
1,622,519
2,612,822
66,652
3,575,849
—
7,877,842
121,478
4,274,640
5,048,157
130,901
—
—
9,453,698
145,778
5,236,824
4,424,842
132,820
—
—
9,794,486
151,033
22,433,053
11,451,754
2,955,614
—
242,980
37,083,401
571,833
Total
33,567,036
23,537,575
3,285,987
3,575,849
242,980
64,209,427
990,122
(1)
(2)
(3)
The long-term debt includes project secured term loans, other secured bank loans. The long-term debt (principal) obligations for foreign currency
denominated project borrowings have been converted to Indian rupees using the closing exchange rate as of March 31, 2017 as per Reserve Bank of India.
Interest on long-term debt is calculated based on the outstanding balance of the debt at the prevailing interest rate for the corresponding periods.
Consists of asset purchase commitment for construction of solar power plants.
G. Safe harbor
This information contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding our future financial and operating guidance, operational and financial results such as estimates of
nominal contracted payments remaining and portfolio run rate, and the assumptions related to the calculation of the foregoing metrics. Forward-looking statements
are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “potential”, “intend”, “expect”, “seek”, “anticipate”, “estimate”,
“believe”, “could”, “plan”, “project”, “predict”, “continue”, “future”, “forecast”, “target”, “guideline” or other similar words or expressions. Our ability to predict
results or the actual effect of plans or strategies is inherently uncertain, particularly given the economic environment. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could
77
Table of Contents
differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements and you should not unduly rely on these statements. These forward-looking statements
involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from those forward-looking statements.
The risks and uncertainties that could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include, but
not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the availability of additional financing on acceptable terms; changes in the commercial and retail prices of traditional utility generated electricity;
changes in tariffs at which long term PPAs are entered into;
changes in policies and regulations including net metering and interconnection limits or caps;
the availability of rebates, tax credits and other incentives;
the availability of solar panels and other raw materials;
our limited operating history, particularly as a new public company;
our ability to attract and retain our relationships with third parties, including our solar partners;
our ability to meet the covenants in our debt facilities;
meteorological conditions; and
such other risks identified in the registration statements and reports that we have file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, from
time to time.
All forward-looking statements in this press release are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update
these forward-looking statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Beginning April 1, 2017, the Company has irrevocably elected to follow public company effective dates for new accounting pronouncements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, ‘‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).’’ This guidance supersedes current guidance on
revenue recognition in Topic 605, ‘‘Revenue Recognition.” In addition, there are disclosure requirements related to the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of
revenue recognition. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No.2015-14 to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities by one year. The core
principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity is required to follow five
steps which comprises of (a) identifying the contract(s) with a customer; (b) identifying the performance obligations in the contract; (c) determining the transaction
price; (d) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (e) recognizing revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance
obligation. The deferral resulted in the new revenue standard being effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2017 (April 1, 2018 for the Company). The Company has the option of adopting the new revenue standard using either one of two methods:
(i) retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within ASU No. 2014-09; or
(ii) retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU No. 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application and providing certain additional
disclosures as defined per ASU No. 2014-09.
The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard update. The ultimate impact on revenue resulting from the application of the new
standard will be subject to assessments that are dependent on many variables, including, but not limited to, the terms of contractual arrangements. The Company
also continues to evaluate the available transition methods and its contractual arrangements. The Company’s considerations include, but are not limited to, the
comparability of its financial statements and the comparability
78
Table of Contents
within its industry from application of the new standard to its contractual arrangements. The Company plans to select a transition method by December 2017. The
Company has established an implementation team to implement the standard update related to the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. The
Company continues to evaluate the changes to accounting system and processes, and additional disclosure requirements that may be necessary.
On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 (“ASU 2016-01”), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which
amends certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. This amendment requires all equity investments to be
measured at fair value, with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under equity method of accounting or those
that result in consolidation of the investee). This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (April 1, 2018 for the Company),
including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases. ASU 2016-02 specifies the accounting for leases. For leases that were formerly
classified as operating, ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease
payments, in its balance sheet. The standard also requires a lessee to recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease
term, on a generally straight-line basis. In addition, this standard requires both lessees and lessors to disclose certain key information about lease transactions. ASU
2016-02 is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018 (April 1, 2019
for the Company), including interim periods within those fiscal years using the modified retrospective method, which will require adjustment to all comparative
periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial
statements and the approach to be used.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation — Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting, which relates to the accounting for employee share-based payments. This standard addresses several aspects of the accounting for share-
based payment award transactions, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the
statement of cash flows; (d) accounting for forfeitures of share-based payments. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016
(April 1, 2017 for the Company), including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on
its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows — Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which clarifies the
presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are an improvement to GAAP because
they provide guidance for each of the eight issues, thereby reducing the current and potential future diversity in practice. This guidance is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (April 1, 2018 for the Company), and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be
applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company does not expect this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, to require the recognition of the income tax
effects from an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with
early adoption permitted. Adoption of the ASU is based on a modified retrospective method. The Company intends to early adopt the ASU fiscal year beginning
April 1, 2017 and early adoption will result in recognition of deferred tax asset on the income taxes paid on the intra entity transfer of assets to the extent these are
expected to be realised by the subsidiary outside of the tax holiday period. The Company believes on early adoption of this
79
Table of Contents
guidance, tax expense is expected to be lower and accordingly its profit after tax is likely to increase as it will result in recognition of deferred tax assets on intra-
entity transfer of assets is likely to be higher than the prepaid taxes it could have recognize earlier.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of cash flows — Restricted cash. The amendments apply to all entities that have restricted
cash or restricted cash equivalents and are required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 230. The amendments in this update require that a statement of
cash flows should explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash
equivalents. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017 (April 1, 2018 for the Company) and interim periods within those
annual periods. Early adoption is permitted with an adjustment reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the amendment is adoption. The Company
does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have any effect on its financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A. Directors and Senior Management
The following discussion sets forth information regarding our directors and senior management as of the date of this annual report. Our Board of Directors is
authorized to appoint officers as it deems appropriate. Provided below is a brief description of our directors’ and officers’ business experience.
Mr. Sanjeev Aggarwal was nominated as a director by Helion Venture Partners, Mr. Barney S. Rush was nominated as a director by IFC GIF Investment
Company and Mr Cyril Cabanes was nominated by Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ). Additionally, one of our directors, Mr. William B. Elmore
resigned in March 2017.
None of our officers and directors are related, except Mr. Harkanwal S. Wadhwa and Mr. Inderpreet S. Wadhwa. Mr. Harkanwal S. Wadhwa is the father of
Mr. Inderpreet S. Wadhwa.
Mr. Eric Ng Yim On and Mr. Muhammad Khalid Peyrye are executives of AAA Global Services Ltd., which provides incorporation, corporate secretarial
and governance services to us.
Name
Directors:
Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa
Robert Kelly
Sanjeev Aggarwal
Barney S. Rush
Arno Harris
Cyril Sebastien Dominique Cabanes
Eric Ng Yim On
Muhammad Khalid Peyrye
Senior Management:
Surendra Kumar Gupta
Preet Sandhu
Mohor Sen
Directors
Age
Position
44
72
59
57
65
47
42
49
38
64
48
67
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
Director and Chief Operating Officer
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President
Chief Administration Officer
Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa , one of our founders, has been our chief executive officer and a member of our Board of Directors since January 2015, has been
the chief executive officer and director of AZI since
80
Table of Contents
November 2008 and was elected as the Chairman of the Board of Directors in June 2017. He has over 20 years of experience in technology and infrastructure
businesses. Prior to founding AZI, Mr. Wadhwa previously served as a vice president of Loyalty Lab and a senior director of Oracle Corporation. Mr. Wadhwa
received his Bachelor’s degree in Electronics Engineering in 1994 from Guru Nanak Dev University (Punjab). He also graduated from Haas School of Business at
University of California Berkeley in 2002.
We believe Mr. Wadhwa is qualified to serve as the Chairman of our Board of Directors because of his extensive experience in infrastructure projects and
prior board service as a director of AZI.
Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa has been a member of our Board of Directors since August 2015 and has been a director and chief operating officer of AZI since
November 2008. He heads the utilities business unit of the organization and focuses on project development and the internal operations of the company. Prior to
joining AZI, Mr. Wadhwa served as chief managing director of National Insurance Limited, India’s largest public insurance organization. He has over 40 years of
experience in the financial services industry in India. He served and/or serves on the boards of General Insurance Corporation of India, India International
Insurance Private Limited and Loss Prevention Association of India Limited and has extensive experience with the regulatory framework in India. Mr. Wadhwa
received his Bachelors of Arts degree from Punjab University in 1963.
We believe Mr. Wadhwa is qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his excellent operations and management skills.
Robert Kelly has been a member of our Board of Directors since September 2015 and has been a director of AZI since December 2014. From October 2011
to August 2014, he served as the chief financial officer of SolarCity Corporation in San Mateo, California. From August 2009 to October 2011, he served as chief
financial officer of Calera Corporation, a clean technology company. Prior to that, he served as an independent consultant providing financial advice to retail
energy providers and power developers and also served in various senior leadership roles at Westinghouse Credit Corporation, Lloyds Bank and The Bank of Nova
Scotia. Mr. Kelly served as chief financial officer and executive vice president of Calpine Corporation, an independent power producer, from March 2002 to
November 2005, as president of Calpine Finance Company from March 2001 to November 2005, and held various financial management roles with Calpine from
1991 to 2001. Mr. Kelly is also a member of the Board of Directors of Solar Mosaic Inc., a U.S. residential solar lending platform, and Solix Algrediants, Inc. a
specialty algae products company for the nutrition and personal care markets. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Commerce from Memorial University of
Newfoundland and an MBA from Dalhousie University, Canada.
We believe Mr. Kelly is qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his extensive business experience, relationships with financial
institutions and solar companies and prior board service.
Cyril Cabanes has been a member of our board of directors since December 2016. He is currently the Vice-President, Head of Infrastructure Transactions,
Asia-Pacific at Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ). He has over 19 years of experience across all facets of infrastructure transactions including
acquisitions, financing and fundraising. This includes his term at Marubeni Corp., where he led the Asian IPP investment team in Singapore. Previously, Cyril was
Director and Portfolio Manager at Deutsche Bank, where he was responsible for acquisitions, capital raising and product development for Asia-Pacific. Prior to
that, Cyril spent 10 years in investment banking and financial markets with RBS, BNP Paribas and UBS. Cyril holds a Masters from ESCP-Europe and an MBA
from Drexel University
We believe Mr. Cabanes is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his extensive experience with the infrastructure sector.
Sanjeev Aggarwal has been a member of our Board of Directors since September 2015 and has been a director of AZI since November 2008. Mr. Aggarwal
is a co-founder of Helion Venture Partners and has served
81
Table of Contents
on the boards of Amba Research, MakeMyTrip Limited and UnitedLex Corporation. Prior to Helion Venture Partners, Mr. Aggarwal was the founder and chief
executive officer of Daksh. Earlier, he worked for 15 years with leading technology companies serving the domestic Indian market. Mr. Aggarwal led the strategic
initiatives at Motorola India and has worked with Digital Equipment Corporation in delivering technology solutions. He has also served as the chief executive
officer of 3COM India.
We believe Mr. Aggarwal is qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his extensive business experience in the financial industry,
relationships with investment firms and prior board service as a director of AZI.
Barney S. Rush has been a member of our Board of Directors since January 2016. He has served on the board of ISO — New England, the electric grid and
wholesale market operator for six U.S. states, since October 2013. Since November 2015, he has also been the Senior Representative of Fieldstone Africa, an
investment bank raising capital for power projects in Africa. From July 2010 to December 2013, he served as an Operating Partner at Denham Capital
Management, L.P., and from July 2003 to November 2009, he served as the CEO of H2Gen Innovations, Inc., a venture capital backed start-up which developed
and manufactured skid-mounted hydrogen generators. In addition, Mr. Rush was Group CEO of Mirant Europe and Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Bewag,
the electric utility serving Berlin, Germany, from August 1999 to May 2002. Mr. Rush holds a Bachelor’s degree in Social Studies from Harvard College and a
Master’s degree in Public Affairs from Woodrow Wilson School of Princeton University.
We believe Mr. Rush is qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his extensive business experience in clean-tech and alternative
energy industries.
Arno Harris has been a member of our Board of Directors since May 2016. He currently serves as chairman emeritus of the Solar Energy Industry
Association and as a board member of Advanced Energy Economy Institute. He founded Recurrent Energy, LLC, in 2006 and held the position of CEO until
March 30, 2015, growing it into one of North America’s largest solar project developers before selling the company to Canadian Solar Inc. Prior to his work at
Recurrent Energy, LLC, he was CEO of Prevalent Power, Inc. and El Solutions, Inc. (now Suntech Energy Solutions) in addition to founding RedEnvelope,
WineShopper.com, and Novo Media Group. Mr. Harris holds a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature from the University of California, Berkeley.
We believe Mr. Harris is qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his extensive experience with clean-tech and his widespread
background in marketing, sales, and consulting.
Eric Ng Yim On was appointed to our Board of Directors in January 2015 and is one of our resident directors in Mauritius. Mr. Ng has been the chief
executive officer of AAA Global Services Ltd. since 2006. Prior to founding AAA Global Services Ltd., Mr. Ng worked for several years with a leading public
company listed on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius and served on the board of the holding company as well as its subsidiary companies. Mr. Ng completed his
secondary education at the Royal College Curepipe in Mauritius and holds various professional qualifications and memberships, including being a member of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales, a member of the International Fiscal Association (Mauritius Branch) and a member of the Mauritius
Institute of Professional Accountants.
We believe Mr. Ng is qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his extensive experience with public companies and because he is
a resident of Mauritius, and two of the members of our Board of Directors are required to be residents of Mauritius under the terms of our Constitution.
Muhammad Khalid Peyrye was appointed to our Board of Directors in January 2015 and is one of our resident directors in Mauritius. Mr. Peyrye is an
executive of AAA Global Services Ltd., having joined the organization in 2007. Prior to joining AAA Global Services Ltd., Mr. Peyrye worked for several years
with a leading financial services company and accountancy firm. Mr. Peyrye received his Bachelor’s degree in Law
82
Table of Contents
and Management from the University of Mauritius. He has been involved extensively on company formations, company administration, cross-border investment
activities and corporate organizational transactions such as mergers and acquisitions and winding-up of companies. In addition to serving as director on the board
of several companies in Mauritius, Mr. Peyrye has, in his career, been involved as money laundering reporting officer and compliance officer of various companies
involved in the financial services sector.
We believe Mr. Peyrye is qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his extensive experience with companies having public
accountability and because he is a resident of Mauritius, and two of the members of our Board of Directors are required to be residents of Mauritius under the terms
of our Constitution.
Executive Officers
Surendra Kumar Gupta is the chief financial officer and heads the finance and operations along with commercial and industrial business unit (C&I) of the
Company. He has over 38 years of international and domestic experience covering strategic business planning, managing business operations and corporate
finance. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Gupta served as the group chief financial officer for Al-Suwaidi Holding Company Limited, a company involved in
providing engineering, procurement, construction and maintenance services to Saudi Arabia’s predominant oil and gas industry, from 2007 to 2010. Mr. Gupta
received his Bachelor’s degree in Commerce in 1972 from Delhi University. He is a chartered accountant and has been a member of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India since January 1977.
Preet Sandhu is an executive vice president and heads the Infra business unit of the Company, which covers engineering, procurement, supply chain
management, R&D, quality and safety, health and environment. He has over 20 years of experience in civil construction and project development in regulated
sectors in India with expertise in transportation, energy and land development. Mr. Sandhu manages engineering and construction for AZI’s projects.
Mohor Sen is the chief administration officer and heads the shared service division of the Company, which covers human resources, marketing and
communication, IT and corporate operations of the Company. Mr. Sen has over 40 years of experience working and consulting for corporations in areas including
project management, human resources, organizational development and strategic communications. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Sen provided consulting
services to AZI from January 2013 to January 2014. Prior to that, from 2008 to 2013, he provided consulting services to other companies in India, including
Reinforced Earth Company and Geopetro International Holding Inc. Mr. Sen received his Bachelor’s degree in Technology from the Indian Institute of Technology
Delhi and a Masters of Science from the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom.
B. Compensation
Director Compensation
During fiscal year 2017, we paid cash compensation to Mr. Inderpreet S. Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal S. Wadhwa and also granted non-cash compensation
to our employees and Directors, in the form of stock options. All options previously granted to employees under the AZI’s employee stock option plan and
Employee Stock Option Plan 2015 have been transferred and replaced by options issued pursuant to our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan. The options outstanding as of
March 31, 2017 are disclosed separately in the table under “Item 6 — Directors, Senior Management and Employees — B. Compensation—Outstanding Options
for Directors and Senior Management.”
Officer Compensation
For the fiscal year 2017, the aggregate compensation (including directors’ fees, but excluding grants of stock option to our directors and executive officers
included in the list under the heading — “Item 6A —
83
Table of Contents
Directors, Senior Management and Employees — A. Directors and senior management” was INR 95.1 million (US$1.50 million). Our agreements with each of the
members of senior management are listed under the heading “Employment Agreement”. Except as otherwise disclosed, the above cash compensation does not
include stock compensation and employee benefits to our Directors and Senior Management.
Employee Benefit Plans
We maintain employee benefit plans in the form of certain statutory and incentive plans covering substantially all of our employees. For fiscal year 2017, the
aggregate amount set aside or accrued by us to provide for pension or retirement benefits for executive officers was INR 3.2 million (US$0.1 million).
Provident Fund
In accordance with Indian law, all of our employees in India are entitled to receive benefits under the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952, as
amended, a retirement benefit scheme under which an equal amount of 12% of the base salary of an employee is contributed both by employer and employee in a
fund with government/trust with company.
Gratuity
In accordance with Indian law, we pay gratuity to our eligible employees in India. Under our gratuity plan, an employee is entitled to receive a gratuity
payment on his superannuation or on his retirement or on the termination of his or her employment if the employee has rendered continuous service to our company
for not less than five years, or if the termination of employment is due to death or disability due to accident or disease. The amount of gratuity payable to an eligible
employee is equal to 15 days’ salary based on the last drawn salary for every completed year of employment (or any portion of a year exceeding six months), and
currently the aggregate amount of gratuity shall not exceed INR 1,000,000.
Leave Encashment Policy
Under AZI’s leave encashment policy, an employee is entitled to receive a payment in exchange for any accrued leave of absence exceeding 45 days that is
outstanding as of April 1 of each fiscal year. Such payment shall be made to the employee by April 30 of that year. In the event of resignation, termination of
employment or retirement, an employee is entitled to a payment for the accrued leave of absence up to a maximum of 45 days if the employee has spent at least 240
working days at AZI. The amount of payment to be made for each day of such accrued leave of absence shall be calculated by dividing the last drawn monthly base
salary by 30 days.
Employment Agreements
Most of our executive officers have entered into an employment agreement with AZI. Aside from the employee benefit plans, our employment agreements
do not provide for any special termination benefits, nor do we have any other arrangements with our directors for special termination benefits.
Each executive officer has acknowledged that ownership of any intellectual property created by him for the company shall vest in the company.
Additionally, Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and Mr. Preet Sandhu have also agreed to transfer and assign to the company all rights, title and interest in and to all
the trademarks, trade names, brand names, patents, designs, domain names and other intellectual property rights created by them for the company.
In addition, each executive officer has agreed to be bound by the non-competition and non-solicit restrictions set forth in his employment agreement.
Specifically, each executive officer has agreed, while employed by us and for a period of one year after termination of his employment, not to:
•
directly or indirectly, enter into the employment of, tender consulting or other services to, acquire any interest in, or otherwise participate in any
business that competes, directly or indirectly, with any of the
84
Table of Contents
companies or entities in the same lines of business that the company is engaged in at the time the employment is terminated; nor
•
solicit, encourage, or induce or attempt to solicit, encourage, or induce any employee or customer, or prospective employees and customers with whom
the company has had discussions or negotiations within the last six months of the termination of his employment not to establish a relationship with
the company.
The employment agreement for Mr. Surendra Kumar Gupta specifies that he is not to be associated with any competitor of the company whatsoever for a
period of at least 12 months after termination of his employment and that he will not solicit or entice any of the company’s customers or any other employee
working in the company during or at any time after the termination of their employment.
Equity-Based Compensation
The Company, post the completion of the initial public offering, adopted the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, existing Employee Stock Option Plan 2015 has
been discontinued for issuance of new grants and the outstanding ESOP pool available for issuance of new grants has been transferred to 2016 Equity Incentive
Plan.
Our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan is a comprehensive incentive compensation plan under which we can grant equity-based and other incentive awards to our
officers, employees and directors.
The objective of the plan is (i) to provide means to enable us to attract and retain high quality human resources in our employment; (ii) to make the
compensations and rewards competitive in the market; and (iii) to achieve sustained growth and create shareholder value by aligning the interests of the employees
with our long term interests.
Pursuant to the U.S. securities laws and regulations, we have filed Form S-8 for registration of equity shares issuable upon exercise of ESOP grants under
our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan with the SEC.
As of March 31, 2017, we had 540,280 equity shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of any outstanding options granted under the ESOP plans and 483,464
equity shares available for issuance pursuant to awards (including the exercise of any options) to be granted under the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan.
The following paragraphs further describe the principal terms of the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan.
Administration
We have appointed Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as plan administrator for the administration of options, including the ESOPs.
Number of Shares Authorized for Grant
Under the terms of the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, which may be amended from time to time, the sum of all grants made under the equity incentive plan
shall not exceed 10% of our total issued and subscribed equity capital.
Eligibility
Our compensation committee may grant options to all eligible employees on the basis of the following criteria: position, role and performance of the
employee, tenure in organization and such other factors as the compensation committee may decide from time to time.
85
Table of Contents
Vesting Schedule
The grants made to any individual shall be vested in the following manner:
•
•
•
•
25% on the expiry of 12 months from the date of grant;
25% on the expiry of 24 months from the date of grant;
25% on the expiry of 36 months from the date of grant; and
25% on the expiry of 48 months from the date of grant.
Option Exercise
There shall be no lock-in period after the options have vested and the options must be exercised by the employees before the end of the tenure of the plan.
Amendment or Termination
Our Board of Directors may in its absolute discretion amend, alter or terminate the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan from time to time, provided that no
amendment, alteration or termination in any grant would impair or prejudice the rights of the employee without the consent of the employee, and provided further
that the Board of Directors may not, without the approval of the shareholders, amend the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (1) to increase the aggregate number of shares
which may be issued pursuant to the provisions of the equity incentive plan on exercise, surrender of options or upon grants; (2) to change the option exercise price;
or (3) to extend the maximum period during which the grants may be made under the plan.
Outstanding Options for Directors and Senior Management
Outstanding options per the S-8 filed on April 18, 2017, under our ESOP plans are:
Name
Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
Arno Harris
Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa
Preet Sandhu
Robert D. Kelly
Surendra Kumar Gupta
Gaurav Sharma
Mohor Sen
Others
Total
Equity Shares
Underlying
Outstanding
Options
118,896
180,292
Exercise Price
per share
(US$ per share)
0.01
13.71
3,680
40,000
2,944
10,368
39,200
53,650
9,024
9,600
19,200
87,648
960
65,128
640,590
0.01
4.73
0.01
1.76
2.71
9.35
0.01
2.71
4.73
2.71
0.01
6.50
Date of
expiration
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
July, 20, 2025
86
Table of Contents
Indemnification Agreements
We have obtained Directors’ and Officers’ liability Insurance to indemnify the Directors and executive officers against certain liabilities and expenses arising
from their being a director or officers.
C. Board Practices
Board of Directors
We are managed and controlled by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors consists of nine directors. Our Board of Directors does not have a
majority of independent directors. As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow home country corporate governance practices. Certain corporate practice
in Mauritius, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Unlike the requirements of the NYSE, the
corporate governance practice and requirements in Mauritius do not require us as a GBC1 to have the majority of our Board of Directors be independent; do not
require us as a GBC1 to establish a nominations committee; and do not require us to hold regular executive sessions where only independent directors shall be
present. In June 2017, the board of the Company established a nominating and corporate governance committee, which will review the corporate governance
practices of the Company.
Terms of Directors and Executive Officers
In accordance with our Constitution, one-third of our directors (or, if their number is not a multiple of three, the number nearest to but not greater than one-
third) shall be up for re-election by rotation at each annual meeting of our company. The Chairman of the Board and/or the managing director during the tenure
shall not be subject to retirement by rotation or be taken into account in determining the number of directors to retire in each year. The directors up for re-election
in each year shall be those who have been in office longest since their last re-election or appointment and as between persons who became or were last re-elected
directors on the same day, those up for re-election shall (unless they otherwise agree among themselves) be determined by lot. Any director may be removed by
either an ordinary resolution of our shareholders or by the majority vote of the Board of Directors in the following circumstances: for cause, which refers to willful
misconduct, fraud, conviction of a felony, gross negligence or breach of a written policy of the company; or if the director becomes mentally unsound or bankrupt
or becomes disqualified from being a director under Mauritius law.
Under Mauritius law, the office of a director of our company is required to become vacant at the conclusion of the annual meeting of our company
commencing next after the director attains the age of 70 years. However, a person of or over the age of 70 years may, by ordinary resolution of which no shorter
notice is given than that required to be given for the holding of a meeting of shareholders, be appointed or re-appointed or authorized to continue to hold office as a
director until the next annual meeting at which such director’s class is up for re-election.
A vacancy on the Board of Directors must be filled by a majority vote of our Board of Directors or by ordinary resolution of the shareholders.
Executive officers are selected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Duties of Directors
Under Mauritius law, our directors have a duty to our company to exercise their powers honestly in good faith in the best interests of our company. Our
directors also have a duty to our company to exercise the degree of care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable
circumstances. Where a director of a public company also holds office as an executive, the director is required under Mauritius law to exercise that degree of care,
diligence and skill which a reasonably prudent and competent executive in that position would exercise. In fulfilling their duty of care to our company, our directors
must ensure compliance with the Mauritius Companies Act and our Constitution, as amended from time to time. A shareholder has the right to seek damages
against our directors if a duty owed by our directors to him as a shareholder is breached.
87
Table of Contents
The functions and powers of our Board of Directors include, among others:
•
•
•
•
Convening shareholders’ annual meetings and reporting its work to shareholders at such meetings;
Authorizing dividends and distributions;
Appointing officers and determining the term of office of officers;
Exercising the borrowing powers of our company and mortgaging the property of our company, provided that shareholders’ approval shall be required
if any transaction is a major transaction for our company under section 130 of the Mauritius Companies Act, which includes, among others,
acquisitions and dispositions worth more than 75% of the value of our company’s assets; and
•
approving the issuance and transfer of shares of our company, including the recording of such shares in our share register.
Subject to the Mauritius Companies Act, our Board of Directors may delegate to a committee of directors, a director or employee of the company, or any
other person, any one or more of its powers.
Additional Restrictions
A. For so long as International Finance Corporation and IFC GIF Investment Company I together hold at least 5% (five percent) of the share capital of the
Company, the decisions on the following matters shall not be taken and/or implemented by the Company unless approved by way of a special resolution of
shareholders:
a. amendment to the articles of association or memorandum of association of Azure Power India Private Limited and its subsidiaries, provided that any
amendment to the articles of association or memorandum of association of the Company’s subsidiaries (other than Azure Power India Private Limited) shall not
require approval of the shareholders of the Company if such amendment is carried out pursuant to a project finance, working capital limits, non-fund based
facilities, mezzanine financing (if the amount raised is less than 20% of the paid-up share capital of the Company) or any other financing arrangements (if the
amount raised is less than 20% of the paid-up share capital of the Company) raised for the Company’s subsidiaries (other than Azure Power India Private Limited)
that have been approved by the Board or Board delegated committee of the Company;
b. disposal or sale, in a single transaction or a series of related transactions, of more than 50% of the Company’s assets (on a consolidated basis), or entry
into a single transaction or a series of related transactions where the Company will incur obligations or liabilities (on a consolidated basis) the value of which is
more than 50% of the Company’s assets (on a consolidated basis) before such transaction or series of related transactions;
c. any change in the business of the Company or its subsidiaries, such business being understood to mean and include the activities that Azure Power India
Private Limited is authorized to carry out under the Main Objects clause of the memorandum of association of Azure Power India Private Limited in effect on
22 July 2015; and
d. any amendment to the ESOP plan approved by the Board, except as would not be a “material revision” as such term is defined in Section 303A.08 of the
New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual.
B. For so long as International Finance Corporation and/or IFC GIF Investment Company I hold any equity shares of the Company, the Company shall not,
in a single transaction, issue equity shares or share equivalents that are more than 10% (ten percent) of the share capital of the Company, unless approved by the
shareholders of the Company by way of an ordinary resolution.
Committees
Our Board of Directors has established the following committees: audit committee, nominating and corporate governance committee, and compensation
committee. Each committee’s members and functions are described below.
88
Table of Contents
Audit Committee
The initial members of our audit committee consisted of Mr. Robert Kelly and Mr. Sanjeev Aggarwal. The same has been reconstituted to include Mr. Arno
Harris as the third member of the Committee. Each of these individuals satisfies the independence requirements set forth in the New York Stock Exchange’s Listed
Company Manual. They also satisfy the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. Our Board of
Directors also has determined that Mr. Kelly qualifies as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the SEC rules and has been appointed as the
Chair of the Committee. Our audit committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the financial statements of our company.
Our audit committee is responsible for, among other things:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Selecting our independent auditors and pre-approving all auditing and non-auditing services permitted to be performed by our independent auditors;
Reviewing with the independent auditors any audit problems or difficulties and management’s response;
Regularly reviewing the independence of our independent auditors;
Reviewing and approving all related party transactions on an ongoing basis;
Discussing the annual audited financial statements with management and our independent auditors;
Reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our accounting and internal control policies and procedures and any steps taken to monitor and control
major financial risk exposures;
Monitoring compliance with our code of business conduct and ethics, including reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our procedures to ensure
proper compliance;
Meeting separately and periodically with management and our internal and independent auditors;
Reporting regularly to our full Board of Directors; and
Such other matters that are specifically delegated to our audit committee by our Board of Directors from time to time.
Compensation Committee
Initially our compensation committee consisted of Mr. Sanjeev Aggarwal and Ms. Diane Farrell. The same has been reconstituted to replace Ms. Diane
Farrell with Mr. Barney Rush and to add Mr. Arno Harris as the third member of the Committee. Presently, Mr. Barney Rush is the Chairman of the Committee.
Each of these individuals satisfies the independence requirements set forth in the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual. Our compensation
committee assists our Board of Directors in reviewing and approving the compensation structure of our directors and executive officers, including all forms of
compensation to be provided to our directors and executive officers. Members of the compensation committee are not prohibited from direct involvement in
determining their own compensation.
Our chief executive officer may not be present at any committee meeting during which his compensation is deliberated. The compensation committee is responsible
for, among other things:
•
•
•
Reviewing and approving the compensation package for our executive officers;
Reviewing the compensation of our executive officers and directors and making recommendations to the board with respect to the compensation;
Reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our chief executive officer, other executive officers and
directors evaluating the performance of our chief executive officer, other executive officers and directors in light of those goals and objectives, and
setting the compensation level of our chief executive officer, other executive officers and directors based on such evaluation; and
89
Table of Contents
•
Reviewing periodically and making recommendations to the board regarding any long term incentive compensation or equity plans, programs or
similar arrangements, annual bonuses, employee pension and welfare benefit plans.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
We established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in June 2017. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of
Mr. Barney Rush, Mr. Robert Kelly, Mr. Sanjeev Aggarwal, and Mr. Cyril Cabanes. Each of these individuals satisfies the “independence” requirements of the
New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Rush is the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The purpose of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee is to assist the Board by fulfilling the following responsibilities:
•
•
•
•
Reviewing and making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to corporate governance guidelines and issues;
Identifying qualified candidates as consistent with the criteria approved by the Board for director nominees and recommending such candidates to the
Board for selection for all directorships to be filled by the Board, in conjunction with the Chairman of the Board;
Nominating the chairs and members of the Board committees, in conjunction with the Chairman of the Board; and
Conducting annual reviews of the Board’s independence, qualifications and experiences in light of the availability of potential Board members; and
oversee the evaluation of the Board of Directors.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics provides that our directors, officers and employees are expected to avoid any action, position or interest that
conflicts with the interests of our company or gives the appearance of a conflict. Directors, officers and employees have an obligation under our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics to advance our company’s interests when the opportunity to do so arises.
D. Employees
As of March 31, 2017, we had 401 full time employees. We consider our relations with our employees to be amicable. The following table sets forth the
number of our employees for each of the major functions as of March 31, 2017:
Infrastructure
Utilities
Finance and Operations
C&I
Shared services
Total
90
Number of
Employees
116
36
142
70
37
401
Table of Contents
E. Share Ownership
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our equity shares as of March 31, 2017 by each of our directors and all our
directors and executive officers as a group and by each person known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of the equity shares. As used in this table, beneficial
ownership means the sole or shared power to vote or direct the voting or to dispose of or direct the sale of any security. A person is deemed to be the beneficial
owner of securities that can be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of any option, warrant or right as on March 31, 2017. Equity Shares subject to options,
warrants or rights that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of the person
holding the options, warrants or rights, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of any other person. The amounts and percentages
as of March 31, 2017 are based on 25,915,956 equity shares outstanding as of this date:
Name
Directors and Officers:
Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa (1)
Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa
Preet Sandhu
Surendra Kumar Gupta
Mohor Sen
Robert Kelly
Sanjeev Aggarwal (2)
Barney S. Rush (3)
Arno Harris (4)
Cyril Cabanes
Eric Ng Yim On (5)
Muhammad Khalid Peyrye (6)
All Directors and Officers as a Group
5% or Greater Shareholders:
IW Green LLC (7)
Helion Venture Partners II, LLC (8)
FC VI India Ventures (Mauritius) Ltd. (9)
IFC GIF Investment Company I (10)
International Finance Corporation (11)
CDPQ Infrastructures Asia Pte Ltd. (12)
Number shares
beneficially
owned
1,744,150
43,680
52,512
37,824
960
26,825
—
—
45,073
—
—
—
2,097,650
1,647,952
3,426,172
3,778,140
5,189,452
2,665,251
5,250,226
(%)
6.73%
0.17%
0.20%
0.15%
0.00%
0.10%
—
—
0.17%
—
—
—
8.09%
6.36%
13.22%
14.58%
20.02%
10.28%
20.26%
(1)
(2)
Includes the equity shares held by IW Green LLC. Mr. Inderpreet Wadhwa is the beneficial owner of all equity interests of IW Green LLC.
Does not include any equity shares of Mr. Aggarwal, a managing director of Helion Venture Partners, who may be deemed to beneficially own through
interests held by funds managed by Helion Venture Partners. Mr. Aggarwal’s business address is Helion Advisors Private Limited, Tower B, 10th Floor,
Vatika Towers, Sector 54, Gurgaon, 122 002, India.
(3) Mr. Rush’s business address is 6917 Maple Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.
(4) Mr. Harris’ business address is 135 Main Street, Suite 1320, San Francisco, California 94105.
(5) Mr. Ng’s business address is c/o AAA Global Services Ltd., 1st Floor, The Exchange 18 Cybercity, Ebene, Mauritius.
(6) Mr. Peyrye’s business address is c/o AAA Global Services Ltd., 1st Floor, The Exchange 18 Cybercity, Ebene, Mauritius.
(7)
The sole member of IW Green LLC is Mr. Inderpreet S. Wadhwa. IW Green LLC was known as IW Green Inc. prior to its conversion to IW Green LLC in
October 2015.
91
Table of Contents
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
Helion Investment Management, LLC holds the voting power in Helion Venture Partners II, LLC. SA Holdings Global Ltd and Gupta Goyal Trust are the
beneficial owners of Helion Investment Management, LLC. Mr. Sanjeev Aggarwal is the beneficial owner of SA Holdings Global Ltd and Mr. Ashish Gupta
and Ms. Nita Goyal are the beneficial owners of Gupta Goyal Trust. Each of the beneficial owners disclaims beneficial ownership in the shares held by the
aforementioned entities except to the extent of his or her pecuniary interest therein. The principal address of Helion Venture Partners II, LLC is Les Cascades
Building, Edith Cavell Street, Port Louis, Mauritius.
FC VI India Holding (Mauritius) Ltd. is the beneficial owner of all equity interests of FC India Venture (Mauritius) Ltd. and exercises sole voting and
investment power over the shares owned by FC India Venture (Mauritius) Ltd. Foundation Capital VI, L.P. and Foundation Capital VI Principals Fund, LLC
are the beneficial owners of FC VI India Holding (Mauritius) Ltd. The general partner of Foundation Capital VI, L.P. and Foundation Capital VI Principals
Fund, LLC is Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC. The managing members of Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC are Mr. Paul Koontz,
Mr. Michael Schuh, Mr. Paul Holland, Mr. Richard Redelfs, Mr. Steve Vassallo, Mr. Charles Moldow and Mr. Warren Weiss. Each of the managing
members of Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC disclaims beneficial ownership in the shares held by the aforementioned entities except to the
extent of his or her pecuniary interest therein. The address of Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC is 250 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA
94025.
IFC Global Infrastructure Fund, LP is the beneficial owner of all equity interests of IFC GIF Investment Company I, while IFC Global Infrastructure (GP)
LLC and IFC Global Infrastructure (Alternate GP) LLP control the management and operations of with IFC Global Infrastructure Fund, LP. The principal
address of IFC GIF Investment Company I is c/o Cim Fund Services Ltd., 33 Edith Cavell Street, Port Louis, Mauritius.
International Finance Corporation is an international organization established by Articles of Agreements among its member countries. Its principal address is
2121, Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, District of Columbia 20433, United States.
(12) CDPQ Infrastructures Asia Pte Ltd., a company organized and existing under the laws of Singapore, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Caisse de dépôt et
placement du Québec, a body constituted by the Act Respecting the Caisse De Dépôt Et Placement Du Québec. The principal address of the Caisse de dépôt
et placement du Québec is 1000, place Jean-Paul-Riopelle, Montréal, Québec, H2Z 2B3.
I TEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A. Major Shareholders
Please refer to “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership”
On October 17, 2016, we completed our initial public offering on the New York Stock Exchange. We sold an aggregate of 3,409,091 equity shares
(including 2,242,424 equity shares sold by us and 1,166,667 equity shares sold by the selling shareholders). The price per equity share was US$18.00.
B. Related Party Transactions
We believe that the terms of our related party transactions are comparable to the terms we could obtain from independent third parties. Our related party
transactions are subject to the review and approval of the audit committee of our Board of Directors. Our audit committee will consider whether the transaction is to
be conducted on an arms-length basis and whether the services can be procured from an independent third party. The charter of our audit committee as adopted by
our Board of Directors provides that we may not enter into any related-party transaction unless and until it has been approved by the audit committee.
92
Table of Contents
Lease Agreement
On November 28, 2011, AZI entered into a lease agreement, which became effective from December 1, 2011, for our registered office building and a lease
arrangement for a guest house, which became effective February 1, 2016 with family members of Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa. Each transaction was conducted
in the normal course of operations, transacted at the market rate and was approved by a majority of the Board of Directors independently. AZI renewed the lease
agreement for our office building on October 15, 2013 for a term of five years ending on April 30, 2018, cancellable after 12 months. For the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, the Company incurred rent expense on office facilities and guest house facilities totaling INR 14.5 million, INR 15.0 million and
INR 19.4 million (US$0.3 million), respectively, where the lessors are relatives of the Company’s chief executive officer and another director of AZI. As of
March 31, 2016, and 2017, the Company had security deposits with these lessors totaling INR 8.6 million (US$0.1 million).
Private Placements
In June 2014, AZI issued 79,245 Series F compulsorily convertible preferred shares at a price of INR 11,224.75 per share to FC VI India Ventures
(Mauritius) Ltd. and Helion Venture Partners II, LLC. The price per share was determined after the foregoing investors offered better pricing terms than the price
per share offered in arm’s length negotiations by independent investors. The transaction was approved by the Board of Directors. In connection with the issuance of
Series F compulsorily convertible preferred shares, AZI and Mr. Inderpreet Wadhwa entered into an Investment Agreement with the foregoing investors. In
December 2014, AZI issued an additional 38,581 Series F compulsorily convertible preferred shares at a price of INR 11,224.75 per share to FC VI India Ventures
(Mauritius) Ltd. and Helion Venture Partners II, LLC.
In June 2014, AZI issued 36,000 compulsorily convertible debentures to International Finance Corporation, at a price of INR 5,000 per share. The price per
share was determined after the foregoing investor offered better pricing terms than the price per share offered in arm’s length negotiations by independent
investors. The transaction was approved by the Board of Directors. In February 2015, AZI issued 20,307 additional Series F compulsorily convertible preferred
shares at a price of INR 11,224.75 per share to International Finance Corporation.
In June 2015, we entered into a subscription agreement with International Finance Corporation and its affiliated entity for the sale of 133,285 shares of Series
H compulsorily convertible preferred shares for US$60 million, which we amended in July 2015. In July 2015, we entered into a subscription agreement with
Société de Promotion et de Participation pour la Coopération Économique, or PROPARCO, for the sale of 18,882 shares of Series G compulsorily convertible
preferred shares for US$8.5 million.
In September 2016, we entered into a subscription agreement, which was subsequently amended, with IFC GIF Investment Company I for the sale of
55,535 shares of Series I compulsorily convertible preferred shares for US$25 million. The closing of this transaction occurred before our initial public offering.
Pursuant to the initial public offering, all the compulsorily convertible preferred shares and compulsorily convertible debentures were converted into equity shares.
Shareholders Agreements
On July 22, 2015, we, AZI and our founders, Mr. Inderpreet Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal Wadhwa, entered into an amended shareholders agreement, or the
AZI Shareholder Agreement, (which supersedes earlier shareholder agreements). Pursuant to the AZI Shareholders Agreement, we have the right to nominate four
directors to AZI’s board, our founders together have the right to nominate two directors who shall be shareholders or consultants of AZI or Azure Power Global
Limited, and shareholders holding more than 50% of the share capital of AZI on a fully diluted basis shall have the right to nominate one director who shall be an
independent director. The AZI Shareholders Agreement provides that it is the intention of all parties to the
93
Table of Contents
agreement to eventually make AZI our wholly-owned subsidiary. Pursuant to the AZI Shareholders Agreement we have a right to require AZI to purchase all AZI
equity securities held by our founders, we have a call option pursuant to which we have the right to require our founders to sell all or part of their AZI equity
securities to us or our nominee purchaser and our founders have a put option (not an obligation) pursuant to which they have the right to require us or our nominee
purchaser to purchase all or part of their AZI equity securities, in each case at the minimum price permissible under applicable law for such purchases of AZI
equity securities. In addition, the AZI Shareholders Agreement prohibits transfers of AZI equity securities by our founders without our consent.
In addition, on July 22, 2015, we entered into a separate shareholders agreement, or the APGL Shareholders Agreement, among us, IFC, Helion Venture
Partners II, LLC, Helion Venture Partners India II, LLC, FC VI India Venture (Mauritius) Ltd., DEG, PROPARCO, IFC GIF Investment Company I, or GIF, and
IW Green Inc. (which has since been converted to IW Green LLC) and our founders, Mr. Inderpreet Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal Wadhwa. The APGL
Shareholders Agreement provides for certain preferential rights, including director nomination rights, rights of first offer, drag-along rights, rights of first refusal,
co-sale rights, call options, information rights and consent rights on certain corporate matters. The APGL Shareholders Agreement was terminated upon the
completion of our initial offering except for the following provisions: (A) a provision requiring, as long as IFC and GIF collectively own an aggregate of 5% of our
equity share capital, shareholder approval by special resolution for (i) amendments to AZI and its subsidiaries’ articles of association or memorandum of
association, except as such amendments may be required for certain financing matters, (ii) material sales or disposals of our assets or our incurrence of material
liabilities, (iii) changes to our business or the business of our subsidiaries and (iv) amendments to our share option plan; (B) a provision requiring, as long as IFC
and/or GIF hold any of our equity shares, shareholder approval by ordinary resolution to be obtained for equity issuances of more than 10% of our share capital;
and (C) provisions requiring our continued compliance with certain standard policies of IFC and PROPARCO on, among other things, environmental, social and
anti-corruption issues, as long as IFC or PROPARCO, respectively, hold any of our equity securities.
Personal Guarantees
Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa have personally guaranteed a working capital facility provided by the Central Bank of
India, for INR 1,980.0 million, in favor of the lender.
In addition, Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa have provided personal guarantees in favor of the Central Bank of India for
the repayment of loans of three of our project subsidiaries in the amounts of INR 217 million, INR 586 million and INR 1,201 million, in addition to the payment
of any interest and other monies payable to the lender.
Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa did not receive any separate remuneration from the company for providing the guarantees.
C. Interest of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
See “Item 18. Financial Statements” for a list of the financial statements filed as part of this annual report.
Legal Proceedings
We are currently involved in and may from time to time, become involved in legal, arbitration or governmental proceedings or be subject to claims arising in
the ordinary course of our business. We are not
94
Table of Contents
presently party to any legal proceedings that, in the opinion of our management, would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, operating results or cash flows if determined adversely to us. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of
defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.
Dividend Policy and Dividend Distribution
We have never declared or paid dividends, nor do we have any present plan to pay any cash dividends on our equity shares in the foreseeable future. We
currently intend to retain our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business.
B. Significant Changes
Except as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we have not experienced any significant changes since the date of the annual financial statement
included in this annual report.
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
A. Offer and Listing Details
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated since our equity shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on October 12, 2016 through
June 14, 2017, the high and low sale prices for our equity shares, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AZRE.”
Annual (fiscal years ended March 31)
2017 (from October 12, 2016)
2018 (through June 14, 2017)
Calendar Quarters
Third Quarter 2016 (from October 12, 2016)
Fourth Quarter 2016
First Quarter 2017
Second Quarter 2017 (through June 14, 2017)
Monthly
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017 (through June 14, 2017)
B. Plan of Distribution
Not Applicable
C. Markets
Our equity shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange Market under the symbol “AZRE”.
95
Price per equity share
High
Low
(US$)
19.99
22.00
18.72
19.99
22.00
22.00
18.55
18.72
17.71
19.99
18.69
22.00
17.58
16.69
12.73
15.01
12.73
14.29
18.59
15.01
15.44
15.50
16.10
14.29
16.20
16.10
15.14
15.01
Table of Contents
D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable
E. Dilution
Not applicable
F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. Share Capital
Not applicable
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
We incorporate by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F the description of our Amended and Restated Constitution contained in our Form F-1
registration statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-208584), as amended, initially filed with the SEC on December 16, 2015.
C. Material Contracts
We have not entered into any material contracts other than those in the ordinary course of business and other than those described in “Item 4. Information on
the Company” or elsewhere in this annual report.
D. Exchange Controls
Foreign Direct Investment
Foreign investments in Indian are primarily governed by the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, as amended (“ FEMA ”), the rules, regulations and
notifications made thereunder, including the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or issue of security by a person resident outside India) Regulations, 2000, as
amended, and the consolidated foreign direct investment policy (effective as of June 7, 2016) (the “ FDI Policy ”) issued by the Department of Industrial Policy
and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
Pursuant to the FDI Policy, investments can be made by non-residents in Indian companies to the extent of the percentage of the total capital of the Indian
company specified in the FDI Policy. The FDI Policy currently allows 100% foreign direct investment in Indian companies engaged in the solar power sector. The
FDI Policy also prescribes certain pricing and reporting requirements in respect of issue and transfer of shares of an Indian company to a non-resident person and
vice-versa and regulates downstream investments by Indian companies that are not owned or controlled by Indian resident persons. The Government of India
amended the method of calculating foreign investment in an Indian company pursuant to Press Note No. 2 (2009 Series) dated February 13, 2009 and Press Note
No. 4 (2009 Series) dated February 25, 2009.
A person residing outside India (other than a citizen of Pakistan or Bangladesh) or any entity incorporated outside India (other than an entity incorporated in
Pakistan or Bangladesh and an Overseas Corporate Body as defined in FEMA) has general permission to purchase shares, convertible debentures or preference
shares of an Indian company, subject to certain terms and conditions.
96
Table of Contents
Currently, subject to certain exceptions, FDI and investment by Non-Resident Indians, or NRIs (as such term is defined in FEMA), in Indian companies do
not require the prior approval of the FIPB or the RBI. The Government of India has indicated that in all cases where FDI is allowed on an automatic basis without
FIPB approval, the RBI would continue to be the primary agency for the purposes of monitoring and regulating foreign investment.
Exchange Rates
The consolidated financial statements and other financial data included in this annual report of Azure Power Global Limited are presented in Indian rupees.
Azure Power Global Limited’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar and reporting currency is the Indian rupee. Further, AZI’s functional currency is Indian rupees.
The functional currencies of AZI’s subsidiaries are their respective local country currencies. The translation from the applicable foreign currencies of AZI’s
subsidiaries into Indian rupees is performed for balance sheet accounts using the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date except for shareholders’ equity,
preferred shares and certain debt, which are translated at the historical rates in effect at the dates of the underlying transactions. Revenue, expense and cash flow
items are translated using average exchange rates for the respective period.
U.S. dollar balances have been translated from Indian rupee amounts solely for the convenience of the readers. The following table sets forth, for each of the
periods indicated, the low, average, high and period-end noon buying rates in The City of New York for cable transfers, in Indian rupees per U.S. dollar, as certified
for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. These rates are provided solely for your convenience and are not necessarily the exchange rates
that we used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements or elsewhere in this annual report or will use in the preparation of our periodic reports or any
other information to be provided to you. We make no representation that any Indian rupee or U.S. dollar amounts referred to in this annual report could have been
or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Indian rupees, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all.
Period
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
December
2017:
January
February
March
April
May
June (Through June 9, 2017)
Indian Rupees per U.S.
Dollar Noon Buying Rate
Period End
53.01
54.86
61.92
63.04
66.15
67.92
67.92
67.48
66.67
64.85
64.27
64.50
64.24
Average
(1)
46.86
53.41
58.91
61.21
64.15
67.16
67.81
68.05
66.97
65.80
64.54
64.42
64.35
Low
44.00
48.65
52.99
58.30
61.41
66.05
67.38
67.48
66.67
64.85
64.08
64.03
64.24
High
53.71
57.13
68.80
63.67
67.10
68.86
68.29
68.39
67.40
66.83
65.10
64.87
64.42
(1)
Averages for a period other than one month are calculated by using the average of the noon buying rate at the end of each month during the period. Monthly
averages are calculated by using the average of the daily noon buying rates during the relevant month.
Source: Federal Reserve Statistical Release.
97
Table of Contents
E. Taxation
Mauritius Taxation
We are a company holding a Mauritius Category 1 Global Business Company, or GBC1, issued by the Financial Services Commission and is a tax resident
in Mauritius. The Income Tax Act 1995 of Mauritius imposes a tax in Mauritius on our chargeable income at the rate of 15%. However, under the Income Tax
(Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996 of Mauritius, subject to the Income Tax Act 1995 and the regulations under the Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit)
Regulations 1996, credit is allowed for foreign tax on the foreign source income of a resident of Mauritius against Mauritius tax computed by reference to the same
income, and where credit is allowed against Mauritius tax chargeable in respect of any income, the amount of Mauritius tax so chargeable shall be reduced by the
amount of the credit.
Under the Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996, “foreign source income” means income which is not derived from Mauritius and includes in
the case of a corporation holding a GBC1 under the Financial Services Act 2007 of Mauritius, income derived in the course of a global business. Subject to the
provisions of the Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996, no credit is allowed in respect of foreign tax unless written evidence is presented to the
Mauritius Revenue Authority showing the amount of foreign tax which has been charged and for this purpose, “written evidence” includes a receipt of the relevant
authorities of the foreign country for the foreign tax or any other evidence that the foreign tax has been deducted or paid to the relevant authorities of that country.
However, pursuant to Regulation 8 of the Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996, if written evidence is not presented to the Mauritius Revenue
Authority showing the amount of foreign tax charged on our company’s foreign source income, the amount of foreign tax shall nevertheless be conclusively
presumed to be equal to 80% of the Mauritius tax chargeable with respect to that income and in such circumstance, the effective tax rate in Mauritius on our
chargeable income would be 3%.
Following amendments to the Financial Services Act 2007 of Mauritius pursuant to the Finance (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2010 in December 2010,
Mauritius companies holding a GBC1 issued by the Financial Services Commission in Mauritius are permitted to conduct business both in and outside Mauritius
(instead of outside Mauritius only). The operations of a GBC1 company in Mauritius will be subject to tax on chargeable income at the rate of 15% in Mauritius.
We hold tax residence certificates issued by the Mauritius Revenue Authority. These certificates are required for the avoidance of double taxation under the
Agreements for the Avoidance of Double Taxation signed between Mauritius and other jurisdictions, including India.
Mauritius has no capital gains tax and has no withholding tax on the payment of dividends.
Investors are urged to consult their own tax advisers in order to fully understand the tax consequences of an investment in the equity shares.
US Federal Income Taxation
The following discussion is a summary of U.S. federal income tax considerations generally applicable to U.S. Holders (as defined below) of the ownership
and disposition of our equity shares. This summary applies only to U.S. Holders that hold the equity share as capital assets (generally, property held for investment)
and that have the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. This summary is based on U.S. tax laws in effect as of the date of this annual report, on U.S. Treasury
regulations in effect or, in some cases, proposed as of the date of this annual report, and judicial and administrative interpretations thereof available on or before
such date. All of the foregoing authorities are subject to change, which could apply retroactively and could affect the tax consequences described below. Moreover,
this summary does not address the U.S. federal estate, gift, Medicare, and alternative minimum tax considerations, or any state, local, and non-U.S. tax
considerations, relating to the ownership and disposition of our equity shares. The following summary does not address all aspects of U.S.
98
Table of Contents
federal income taxation that may be important to particular investors in light of their individual circumstances or to persons in special tax situations such as:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Banks and other financial institutions;
Insurance companies;
Pension plans;
Cooperatives;
Regulated investment companies;
Real estate investment trusts;
Broker-dealers;
Traders that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting;
Certain former U.S. citizens or long term residents;
Tax-exempt entities (including private foundations);
Persons liable for alternative minimum tax;
Persons holding equity share as part of a straddle, hedging, conversion or integrated transaction;
Persons that actually or constructively own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our voting stock;
Persons who acquired equity share pursuant to the exercise of any employee share option or otherwise as compensation; or
Entities taxable as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or persons holding equity share through such entities.
INVESTORS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL TAX
RULES TO THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AS WELL AS THE STATE, LOCAL, NON-U.S. AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES TO
THEM OF THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR EQUITY SHARES.
For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our equity shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
•
•
•
•
An individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
A corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in the United States or under the
laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
An estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
A trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and the control of one or more United States persons for all substantial
decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
The tax treatment of a partner in any entity taxable as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes that holds our equity share will depend on the status
of such partner and the activities of such partnership. If you are a partner in such partnership, you should consult your tax advisors.
Dividends and Other Distributions
Subject to the passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, rules discussed below, the gross amount (in U.S. dollars) of any distribution we make to you on
our equity shares (including the amount of any taxes
99
Table of Contents
withheld therefrom) will generally be includible in your gross income as dividend income on the date of receipt, but only to the extent that such distribution is paid
out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Amounts not treated as dividend income for U.S.
federal income tax purposes will constitute a return of capital and will first be applied against and reduce your tax basis in your equity share, but not below zero.
Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits and your tax basis in your equity share will be treated as capital gain realized on the sale
or other disposition of the equity share. However, we do not intend to calculate our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, you
should expect that any distribution we make to you will be reported as a dividend even if such distribution would otherwise be treated as a non-taxable return of
capital or as capital gain under the rules described above. Any dividends we pay will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations
for dividends received from other U.S. corporations.
Under current law, certain non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individual U.S. Holders, dividends will be taxed at the lower capital gains rate applicable to
“qualified dividend income,” provided that (1) our equity shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States including the NYSE,
(2) we are neither a PFIC nor treated as such with respect to you for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid and the preceding taxable year and (3) certain
holding period requirements are met. You should consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of the lower tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income
for any dividends we pay on our equity shares, as well as the effect of any change in applicable law after the date of this annual report.
Dividends will generally be treated as income from foreign sources for United States foreign tax credit purposes. A U.S. Holder may be eligible, subject to
complex limitations, to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to any foreign withholding taxes imposed on dividends received on our equity share. The rules
relating to the determination of the foreign tax credit are complex, and you should consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of a foreign tax credit in your
particular circumstances.
Dispositions
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, you will generally recognize taxable capital gain or loss on any sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of an
equity share equal to the difference between the amount realized (in U.S. dollars) for the equity share and your adjusted tax basis (in U.S. dollars) in the equity
share. If you are a non-corporate U.S. Holder, including an individual U.S. Holder, that has held the equity share for more than one year, you may be eligible for
reduced tax rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any capital gain or loss will generally be treated as U.S.-source gain or loss for U.S.
foreign tax credit purposes. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences if a foreign tax is imposed on a disposition of our
equity shares, including the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
A non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year if either:
•
•
At least 75% of its gross income for such year is passive income; or
At least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year produce passive income or are held
for the production of passive income.
For this purpose, we will be treated as owning our proportionate share of the assets and earning our proportionate share of the income of any other
corporation in which we own, directly or indirectly, at least 25% (by value) of the stock.
Although we are engaged in an active business and we do not generate substantial passive income relative to the revenue from our active business, the PFIC
rules are complex. The determination of whether we will be or
100
Table of Contents
become a PFIC will depend, in part, on the composition of our income and assets. Fluctuations in the market price of our equity shares may cause us to become a
PFIC for the current or subsequent taxable years because the value of assets for the purpose of the asset test may be determined by reference to the market price of
our equity shares. The composition of our income and assets may also be affected by how, and how quickly, we use our liquid assets and the cash raised during our
initial public offering. Although, based on our current income and assets, we presently do not expect to be classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year and do
not anticipate becoming a PFIC in future taxable years, there can be no assurance in this regard.
If we are determined to be a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder of our equity shares and
such U.S. Holder did not make a mark-to-market election as described below, such holder generally will be subject to special rules with respect to:
•
•
Any gain recognized by the U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of our equity shares; and
Any “excess distribution” made to the U.S. Holder (generally, any distributions to such U.S. Holder during a taxable year of the U.S. Holder that are
greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received by such U.S. Holder in respect of our equity shares during the three preceding taxable
years of such U.S. Holder or, if shorter, such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the equity shares).
Under these rules,
•
•
•
•
The U.S. Holder’s gain or excess distribution will be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the equity share;
The amount allocated to the U.S. Holder’s taxable year in which the U.S. Holder recognized the gain or received the excess distribution, or to the
period in the U.S. Holder’s holding period before the first day of our first taxable year in which we qualified as a PFIC, will be taxed as ordinary
income;
The amount allocated to other taxable years (or portions thereof) of the U.S. Holder and included in its holding period will be taxed at the highest tax
rate in effect for that year and applicable to the U.S. Holder; and
Additional tax equal to the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed in respect of the tax attributable to each such
other taxable year of the U.S. Holder.
If we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you for any taxable year, if any of our subsidiaries are also PFICs or if we make direct or indirect equity
investments in other entities that are PFICs, you will be deemed to own shares in such lower-tier PFICs that are directly or indirectly owned by us in that proportion
that the value of the equity share you own bears to the value of all of our equity shares, and you may be subject to the rules described in the preceding two
paragraphs for the shares of such lower-tier PFICs that you would be deemed to own. You should consult your tax advisors regarding how the PFIC rules apply to
any of our subsidiaries or direct or indirect equity investments.
If a U.S. Holder, at the close of its taxable year, owns stock in a PFIC that are treated as “marketable stock” for United States federal income tax purposes,
the U.S. Holder may make a mark-to-market election with respect to such stock for such taxable year. If the U.S. Holder makes a valid mark-to-market election for
the first taxable year of the U.S. Holder in which the U.S. Holder holds (or is deemed to hold) our equity shares and for which we are determined to be a PFIC, such
holder generally will not be subject to the PFIC rules described above with respect to its equity shares. Instead, in general, the U.S. Holder will include as ordinary
income each year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of its equity shares at the end of its taxable year over the adjusted tax basis in its equity shares. The
U.S. Holder also will be allowed to take an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of its equity shares over the fair market value of
its equity shares at the end of its taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the mark-to-market election).
The U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its equity shares will be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amounts, and any further gain recognized on a sale or
other taxable disposition of the equity shares will be treated as ordinary income.
101
Table of Contents
The mark-to-market election is available only for stocks that are regularly traded on a national securities exchange that is registered with the SEC, including
the NYSE, or on a foreign exchange or market that the Internal Revenue Service determines has rules sufficient to ensure that the market price represents a
legitimate and sound fair market value. Although our equity shares are listed on the NYSE, we cannot guarantee that they will continue to be listed and traded on
the NYSE. In addition, the mark-to-market election may not be available with respect to any lower-tier PFICs unless shares of such lower-tier PFICs are
themselves “marketable stock.” U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability and tax consequences of a mark-to-market election in
respect to our equity share under their particular circumstances.
Alternatively, a U.S. person that owns stock of a PFIC generally may make a “qualified electing fund” election regarding such corporation to elect out of the
PFIC rules described above regarding excess distributions and recognized gains. We currently do not intend to prepare or provide the information that would enable
you to make a qualified electing fund election.
A U.S. Holder that owns, or is deemed to own, equity shares in a PFIC during any taxable year of the U.S. Holder may have to file Internal Revenue Service
Form 8621 with such U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax return.
You should consult your tax advisors regarding how the PFIC rules apply to your investment in our equity shares and the elections and reporting
requirements discussed above.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Dividend payments with respect to equity shares and proceeds from the sale, exchange or other disposition of equity shares will generally be subject to
information reporting to the US Internal Revenue Service and possible US backup withholding at a current rate of 28%. Backup withholding will not apply,
however, to a US Holder that furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number and makes any other required certification on US Internal Revenue Service Form
W-9 or that is otherwise exempt from backup withholding. US Holders that are exempt from backup withholding should still complete US Internal Revenue
Service Form W-9 to avoid possible erroneous backup withholding. You should consult your tax advisors regarding the application of the US information reporting
and backup withholding rules.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as backup withholding may be credited against your US federal income tax liability, and you
may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing an appropriate claim for refund with the US Internal Revenue
Service and furnishing any required information in a timely manner.
Information Reporting with Respect to Foreign Financial Assets
A U.S. Holder that owns “specified foreign financial assets,” including securities issued by a non-U.S. corporation, with an aggregate value in excess of
US$50,000 at the end of the year (or a higher dollar amount prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service) may be required to file an information report with respect
to such assets with such U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax return, subject to certain exceptions. These rules also impose penalties if a U.S. Holder is required to
submit such information to the Internal Revenue Service and fails to do so. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application of this
legislation to their ownership of the equity shares.
Transfer Reporting Requirements
A U.S. Holder (including a U.S. tax-exempt entity) that transfers cash in exchange for equity of a newly created non-U.S. corporation may be required to file
a Form 926 or a similar form with the Internal Revenue Service if (i) such person owned, directly or by attribution, immediately after the transfer at least 10% by
vote or
102
Table of Contents
value of the corporation or (ii) if the transferred cash, when aggregated with all transfers made by such person (or any related person) within the preceding 12
month period, exceeds US$100,000. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the applicability of this requirement to their acquisition of equity
shares.
Indian Taxation
The discussion contained herein is based on the applicable tax laws of India as in effect on the date hereof and is subject to possible changes in Indian law
that may come into effect after such date. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisers as to the consequences of purchasing the equity shares,
including, without limitation, the consequences of the receipt of dividend and the sale, transfer or disposition of the equity shares.
Dividend payments to Azure Power Global Limited by our subsidiary, AZI, are subject to dividend distribution tax in India payable by AZI at a rate of
17.304% on the total amount distributed as a dividend as grossed up by the amount of such dividend distribution tax. Any dividend income in respect of our equity
shares will not be subject to any withholding or deduction in respect of Indian income tax laws so long as our holding company is deemed to be tax resident in
Mauritius.
Pursuant to amendments to the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended, income arising directly or indirectly through the transfer of a capital asset,
including any share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside India, will be liable to tax in India, if such share or interest derives, directly
or indirectly, its value substantially from assets (whether tangible or intangible) located in India and whether or not the seller of such share or interest has a
residence, place of business, business connection, or any other presence in India. The share or interest of the company or entity registered or incorporated outside of
India, shall be deemed to derive its value substantially from the assets located in India, if the value of such Indian assets exceeds INR 100 million, and represents at
least 50% of the value of all the assets owned by the company or entity registered or incorporated outside of India. Substantially all of our assets are located in
India. However, if the transferor of share or interest in a company or entity registered or incorporated outside of India (along with its associated enterprises), neither
holds the right of management or control in the company or entity registered or incorporated outside of India nor holds voting power or share capital or interest
exceeding 5% of the total voting power or total share capital or interest in the company or entity registered or incorporated outside of India, at any time during the
twelve months preceding the date of transfer, such small shareholders are exempt from the indirect transfer provisions mentioned above.
The amendments also do not deal with the interplay between the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended, and the double taxation avoidance agreements
that India has entered into with countries such as the United States, in case of an indirect transfer. Accordingly, the implications of these amendments are presently
unclear. If it is determined that these amendments apply to a holder of our equity shares, such holder could be liable to pay tax in India on such income.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable
G. Statements by Experts
Not applicable
H. Documents on Display
All information filed with the SEC can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549. You can request copies of these documents upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for
further
103
Table of Contents
information on the operation of the public reference rooms. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements
and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings through its Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval, or EDGAR, system. All our
Exchange Act reports and other SEC filings will be available through the EDGAR system.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to several market risks in our normal business activities. Market risk is the potential loss that may result from market changes associated
with our business or with an existing or forecasted financial or commodity transaction. The types of market risks we are exposed to are interest rate risk and foreign
currency risk.
Interest Rate Risk
As of March 31, 2017, our long-term debt was at both fixed and variable interest rates. Exposure to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the amount of
debt that bears interest at variable rates, the time at which the interest rate is adjusted and the quantum of fluctuation in the interest rate.
Our results of operations are subject to interest rate fluctuations on our variable rate borrowings. The sensitivity analysis below have been determined based
on the exposure to interest rates for non-derivative financial instruments at the balance sheet date. For floating rate liabilities, the analysis is prepared assuming the
amount of liability outstanding at the balance sheet date was outstanding for the whole period.
A hypothetical increase or decrease in our variable interest rates by 1% would not have had a significant increase or decrease in interest cost for the
Company, for ended March 31, 2017.
We intend to use hedging strategies to mitigate our exposure to interest rate fluctuations, we may not hedge all of our interest rate risk and, to the extent we
enter into interest rate hedges, our hedges may not necessarily have the same duration as the associated indebtedness. Our exposure to interest rate fluctuations will
depend on the amount of indebtedness that bears interest at variable rates, the time at which the interest rate is adjusted, the amount of the adjustment, our ability to
prepay or refinance variable rate indebtedness when fixed rate debt matures and needs to be refinanced and hedging strategies we may use to reduce the impact of
any increases in rates.
Foreign Currency Risk
The functional currency of AZI is Indian rupees. We have long term debts denominated in U.S. dollars and Indian rupees. Fluctuations in the exchange rates
between U.S. dollars and Indian rupees may result in higher fair value adjustments on our outstanding foreign currency loans, thereby adversely impacting our
earnings.
We also have two international subsidiaries and major purchases of material are transacted in U.S. dollars. Consequently, we are exposed to foreign
exchange risk on purchases from overseas suppliers. The exchange rate between Indian rupees and U.S. dollars has fluctuated significantly in recent years and may
continue to fluctuate in the future. Depreciation of the Indian rupee against the U.S. dollar can adversely affect our results of operations.
We have partially hedged against debts denominated in U.S. dollars in order to minimize an adverse impact of a large currency movement. These hedges are
for a period of up to three years. We have taken foreign currency loans for our Punjab 1, Gujarat 1, Rajasthan 1 and Rajasthan 2 projects.
104
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2017 we have outstanding option contracts with notional value of US$15.0 million for hedging the foreign currency risk on borrowings
denominated in U.S. dollars. The remaining term of these contracts as of March 31, 2017 ranges from 3 months to 24 months. These option contracts have a fair
value on each reporting date. The changes in the fair value of these option contracts are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and are included in
foreign exchange loss.
We continue to monitor our risks and will consider hedging significant foreign currency exposures on an ongoing basis.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable
105
Table of Contents
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None
PART II
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Material modifications to the rights of the security holders
There have been no material modifications to the rights of securities holders or the use of proceeds
Use of proceeds
On October 17, 2016, we completed our initial public offering and a concurrent private placement of our equity shares pursuant to a Registration Statement
on Form F-1, as amended (File No. 333-208584), which became effective on October 11, 2016. Barclays Capital Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, and
Roth Capital Partners, LLC acted as managing underwriters for the issue. An aggregate of 2,242,424 shares were sold by us in the offering along with 1,166,667
shares sold by the selling shareholders at a price of US$18.00 per share. We offered 4,166,667 shares to CDPQ Infrastructures Asia Pte Ltd., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec on a concurrent private placement at the same price. The initial offering by the Company and the private
placement resulted in aggregate gross proceeds before expense of US$115.4 million and incurred an underwriters commission and other expenses of US$14.4
million. We have used US$100.0 million of the net proceeds to purchase equity shares of our subsidiary AZI as outlined in the registration station and prospectus.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, management, including our group chief executive officer and our group chief financial and
operating officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Disclosure
controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding our required disclosure.
Based on the foregoing, our group chief executive officer and our group chief financial and operating officer have concluded that, as of March 31, 2017, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
B. Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
This annual report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting due to a transition period
established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.
C. Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our Company’s Registered Public Accounting firm, as the Company being an emerging growth
company under JOBS Act is exempted from such attestation requirement.
106
Table of Contents
D. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the period covered by this annual report, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Kelly is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 16A(b) of Form 20-F by the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s rules and “independent” as that term is defined in the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
On May 2, 2016, we adopted a Code of Conduct for all employees and a Code of Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, our principal financial
and accounting officer and our other senior officers. Copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on the “Investor Relations” page of our
corporate website www.azurepower.com or at http://investors.azurepower.com/~/media/Files/A/Azure-Power-IR/governance-documents/code-of-business-
conduct-and-ethics-2-may-2016.pdf .
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Ernst and Young has served as our independent registered public accountant for each of the years ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 for which
audited statements appear in this annual report.
The following table shows the aggregate fees for professional services and other services rendered by Ernst and Young and the various member firms of
Ernst and Young to us, including some of our subsidiaries, in fiscal years 2017 and 2016.
Particulars
Audit fees (audit and review of financial statements and offerings)
All other fees (Tax Advisory services)
Total
2016
(INR)
58,551,825
400,000
58,951,825
2017
(INR)
41,800,000
1,498,000
43,298,000
2017
(US$)
644,564
23,099
667,664
The policy of our audit committee is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by Ernst and Young, including audit services, audit-related
services and tax services. We have a written policy on the engagement of an external auditor.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Not applicable
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
Not applicable
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
Not applicable
107
Table of Contents
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We are a “foreign private issuer” (as such term is defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act) and our equity shares are listed on the New York Stock
Exchange. Under Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, New York Stock Exchange listed companies that are foreign private
issuers are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of the corporate governance provisions specified by the New York Stock Exchange, with limited
exceptions. As required by the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, we note the following significant differences between our corporate
governance practices and the corporate governance practices required to be followed by U.S. domestic companies under the New York Stock Exchange Listed
Company Manual:
•
Under the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, the board of directors of U.S. domestic listed companies are required to have a
majority of independent directors. We are not subject to this requirement under the Mauritius law and have decided to follow home country practice on
this matter. Our board of directors currently does not have a majority of independent directors.
•
The New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual also requires U.S. domestic listed companies to regularly hold executive sessions for non-
management directors, or an executive session that only includes independent directors at least once a year. We are not subject to this requirement
under the Mauritius law and have decided to follow our home country practice on this matter
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable
108
Table of Contents
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See “Item 18. Financial Statements” for a list of the financial statements filed as part of this annual report.
PART III
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements are filed as part of this annual report, together with the report of the independent registered public accounting firms:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016 and 2017.
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive loss for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
Consolidated Statements of Preferred Shares and Shareholders deficit for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number
Description
1.1†
2.1†
4.1#†
4.2†
4.3†
4.4†
The Constitution of Azure Power Global Limited, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our Registration
Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2016)
Form of Equity Share Certificate of Azure Power Global Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Registration
Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 2015)
2016 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2016)
Shareholders Agreement, dated July 22, 2015, by and among the shareholders named therein and Azure Power Global Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on December 16, 2015)
Shareholders Agreement, dated July 22, 2015, by and among Azure Power Global Limited, AZI, Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and
Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2016)
Amendment to the Shareholders Agreement, dated March 30, 2016, by and among the shareholders named therein and Azure Power
Global Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 19, 2016)
109
Table of Contents
4.5†
4.6†
4.7†
4.8†
4.9†
4.10#†
4.11#†
4.12#†
4.13#†
4.14#†
4.15#†
4.16†
4.17†
Second Amendment to the Shareholders Agreement, dated September 5, 2016, by and among the shareholders named therein and Azure
Power Global Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 2016)
Sponsor Lock-in Agreement, dated July 22, 2015, by and among the shareholders named therein and IW Green Inc. and Inderpreet Singh
Wadhwa (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 19, 2016)
Amendment to the Sponsor Lock-in Agreement, dated April 16, 2016, by and among the shareholders named therein and IW Green Inc.
and Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333
208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 19, 2016)
Second Amendment to the Sponsor Lock-in Agreement, dated September 5, 2016, by and among the shareholders named therein and IW
Green Inc. and Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file
No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 2016)
Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among the shareholders named therein and Azure Power Global Limited (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 30, 2016)
Employment Agreement, dated November 7, 2008, by and between AZI and Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 16, 2015)
Employment Agreement, dated May 5, 2011, by and between AZI and Surendra Kumar Gupta (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16,
2015)
Employment Agreement, dated February 1, 2013, by and between AZI and Sandeep Chopra (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of
our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16,
2015)
Employment Agreement, dated November 1, 2009, by and between AZI and Preet Sandhu (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of
our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16,
2015)
Employment Agreement, dated August 31, 2011, by and between AZI and Glen Minyard (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of
our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16,
2015)
Employment Agreement, dated February 1, 2014, by and between AZI and Mohor Sen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of our
Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 2015)
Indenture of Lease, dated October 15, 2013, by and between AZI and Sunbir Singh Wadhwa and Kulwinder Wadhwa (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 16, 2015)
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Azure Power Global Limited and each of the Officers and Directors of Azure Power
Global Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 15, 2016)
110
Table of Contents
4.18†
4.19†
4.20†
4.21†
4.22†
4.23†
4.24†
4.25†
4.26*
8.1*
11.1*
12.1*
12.2*
13.1**
13.2**
101.INS*
Subscription Agreement, dated June 24, 2015, by and among AZI, Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa, Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa and
International Finance Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333
208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 2015)
Subscription Agreement, dated June 24, 2015, by and among Azure Power Global Limited, Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa, Harkanwal Singh
Wadhwa, IW Green Inc. (which has since been converted to IW Green LLC) and IFC GIF Investment Company I (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 16, 2015)
CCPS Subscription Agreement, dated July 22, 2015, by and among Azure Power Global Limited, Sponsors and Société de Promotion et
de Participation pour la Coopération Économique S.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of our Registration Statement on
Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 2015)
Letter Agreement, dated July 27, 2015, by and among Azure Power Global Limited, International Finance Corporation, AZI, IW Green
Inc. (which has since been converted to IW Green LLC), Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 16, 2015)
Third Amendment to the Shareholders Agreement, dated September 28, 2016, by and among the shareholders named therein and Azure
Power Global Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2016)
CCPS Subscription Agreement, dated September 19, 2016, by and among Azure Power Global Limited, the Sponsors named therein and
IFC GIF Investment Company I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333
208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2016)
Amendment to CCPS Subscription Agreement, dated September 28, 2016, by and among Azure Power Global Limited, the Sponsors
named therein and IFC GIF Investment Company I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of our Registration Statement on
Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2016)
Share Purchase Agreement, dated September 30, 2016, by and between Azure Power Global Limited and CDPQ Infrastructures Asia Pte
Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of our Registration Statement on Form F-1 (file No. 333 208584) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2016)
Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, dated March 28, 2017, by and among Azure Power Global Limited, AZI, Inderpreet
Singh Wadhwa and Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa.
List of Subsidiaries of Azure Power Global Limited
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of the Registrant
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
XBRL Instance Document
111
Table of Contents
101.SCH*
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*
101.LAB*
101.PRE*
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
#
†
*
**
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.
Previously filed
Filed with this annual report on Form 20-F
Furnished with this annual report on Form 20-F
112
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign
this annual report on this Form 20-F on its behalf.
Azure Power Global Limited
/s/ Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
By:
Name: Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
Title:
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer
Date: June 19, 2017
113
Table of Contents
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Preferred Shares and Shareholders’ Equity/(Deficit) for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-1
Page
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-8
F-9
Table of Contents
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Azure Power Global Limited
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Azure Power Global Limited as of March 31, 2016 and 2017, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive loss, preferred shares and shareholders’ equity/deficit and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
March 31, 2017. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to
perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis
for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Azure Power Global Limited
at March 31, 2016 and 2017, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2017, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young Associates LLP
Gurgaon, India
June 19, 2017
F-2
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands, except share and par value data)
As of March 31,
2016
(INR)
2017
(INR)
2017
(USD)
(Note 2d)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Investments in available for sale securities
Restricted cash
Accounts receivable, net
Deferred IPO cost
Prepaid expenses and other current assets#
Total current assets
Restricted cash
Property, plant and equipment, net
Software, net
Deferred income taxes
Investments in held to maturity securities
Other assets*
Total assets
Liabilities, preferred shares and shareholders’ equity / (deficit)
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt
Accounts payable
Current portion of long-term debt
Income taxes payable
Interest payable
Deferred revenue
Other liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt
Deferred revenue
Deferred income taxes
Asset retirement obligations
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Preferred shares, INR 10 par value, 805,462 and nil shares designated as compulsorily convertible preferred shares as of
March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively
Redeemable non-controlling interest
Shareholders’ equity/(deficit)
Equity shares, US$ 0.000625 par value; 1,758,080 and 25,915,956 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and 2017
respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated deficit
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Total APGL shareholders’ equity/(deficit)
Non-controlling interest
Total shareholders’ equity/(deficit)
Total liabilities, preferred share and shareholders’ equity/(deficit)
3,090,386
—
821,891
556,755
208,731
308,007
5,460,670
3,296,797
3,629,037
1,138,605
—
495,937
84,205
50,837
55,960
17,558
—
7,647
4,985,770 14,021,046 216,207
21,333
24,381,429 40,942,608 631,343
235
485
102
16,863
30,890,840 57,493,965 886,568
15,272
31,429
6,631
1,093,565
14,657
34,661
6,785
595,901
1,383,414
871,637
2,460,240
3,618,251
1,554,806
232,420
189,309
79,937
484,477
1,258,241
1,899,488
4,477,696
45,215
126,122
80,201
214,487
8,101,450
37,937
55,794
23,975
3,584
2,919
1,233
7,470
8,619,440 132,912
18,352,714 31,142,762 480,228
21,337
16,627
3,747
1,682
28,248,591 42,576,279 656,533
1,383,691
1,078,255
242,980
109,151
1,190,142
470,048
94,301
39,936
9,733,272
346,754
—
390,827
—
6,027
68
1,073
(5,723,420)
40,326
17
(2,958,166) 18,904,151 291,506
(88,256)
(4,508,156)
622
28,807
(7,437,447) 13,222,130 203,889
20,119
(7,437,777) 14,526,859 224,008
30,890,840 57,493,965 886,568
1,304,729
(330)
#
*
Includes Security deposit of INR Nil and INR 6,407 (US$ 99) to related parties as of 31 March, 2016 and March 31, 2017, respectively, also see Note 18.
Includes Security deposit of INR 8,567 and INR 2,160 (US$ 33) to related parties as of 31 March, 2016 and March 31, 2017, respectively, also see Note 18.
See accompanying notes.
F-3
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
Operating revenues:
Sale of power
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of operations (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
General and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating cost and expenses
Operating income
Other expense:
Interest expense, net
(Gain)/Loss on foreign currency exchange, net
Total other expenses
Loss before income tax
Income tax expense
Net loss
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
Net loss attributable to APGL
Accretion to Mezzanine CCPS
Accretion to redeemable non-controlling interest
Net loss attributable to APGL equity shareholders
Net loss per share attributable to APGL equity stockholders
Basic and diluted
Shares used in computing basic and diluted per share amounts
Equity shares
See accompanying notes.
F-4
2015
(INR)
Year ended March 31,
2016
(INR)
2017
(INR)
2017
(US$)
(Note 2d)
1,124,138
2,626,148
4,182,985
64,502
79,816
425,952
322,430
828,198
295,940
190,648
672,841
687,781
1,551,270
1,074,878
375,787
797,161
1,046,565
2,219,513
1,963,472
5,795
12,292
16,138
34,225
30,277
831,790
299,628
1,131,418
(835,478)
(253,112)
(1,088,590)
(5,595)
(1,082,995)
(755,207)
—
(1,838,202)
2,058,836
343,137
2,401,973
(1,327,095)
(327,745)
(1,654,840)
(4,651)
(1,650,189)
(1,347,923)
(29,825)
(3,027,937)
2,371,836
(109,128)
2,262,708
(299,236)
(892,333)
(1,191,569)
(18,924)
(1,172,645)
(235,853)
(44,073)
(1,452,571)
36,574
(1,683)
34,891
(4,614)
(13,760)
(18,374)
(292)
(18,082)
(3,637)
(680)
(22,399)
(1,046)
(1,722)
(111)
(1.72)
1,758,080
1,758,080 13,040,618
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands)
Year ended March 31,
Net loss attributable to APGL equity shareholders
Add: non-controlling interest
Other comprehensive loss/(gain), net of tax
Foreign currency translation
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities (Net of tax, INR 10,028)
Total comprehensive loss
Less: total comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest
Total comprehensive loss attributable to APGL equity shareholders
See accompanying notes.
F-5
2015
(INR)
2016
(INR)
(1,838,202) (3,027,937)
(4,651)
(5,595)
2017
(INR)
2017
(US$)
(Note 2d)
(1,452,571) (22,399)
(292)
(18,924)
(3,180)
—
(5,615)
—
(1,846,977) (3,038,203)
—
(1,846,977) (3,038,203)
—
10,228
(21,746)
158
(335)
(1,483,013) (22,868)
—
(1,483,013) (22,868)
—
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Consolidated Statements of Preferred Shares and Shareholders’ Equity/(Deficit)
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands)
Balance as of March 31, 2014
Proceeds from issue of shares to founders
Issuance of series F CCPS
Net loss
Accretion on Mezzanine CCPS
Other comprehensive loss
Share based compensation
Balance as of March 31, 2015
Preferred
shares
2,385,725
—
1,549,010
—
755,207
—
—
4,689,942
Equity
shares
68
—
—
—
—
—
—
68
Additional paid
in capital
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
(894,401)
68
—
—
(755,207)
—
7,428
(1,642,112)
F-6
20,012
—
—
—
—
3,180
—
23,192
Accumulated
deficit
(1,745,307)
—
—
(1,082,995)
—
—
—
(2,828,302)
Total APGL
shareholders’
deficit
(2,619,628)
68
—
(1,082,995)
(755,207)
3,180
7,428
(4,447,154)
Non-
controlling
interests
10,170
—
—
(5,595)
—
—
—
4,575
Total
shareholders’
deficit
(2,609,458)
68
—
(1,088,590)
(755,207)
3,180
7,428
(4,442,579)
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Consolidated Statements of Preferred Shares and Shareholders’ Equity/(Deficit)
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands)
Balance as of March 31, 2015
Issuance of Series H CCPS
Accretion of CCPS
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss
Adjustment to share capital and reserves of
predecessor on transfer of net assets via a
common control transaction
Accretion of redeemable non-controlling
interest
Share based compensation
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares
Balance as of March 31, 2016
Preferred
shares
4,689,942
3,695,407
1,347,923
—
—
Equity
shares
68
—
—
—
—
Additional paid
in capital
(1,642,112)
—
(1,347,923)
—
—
—
—
(20,205)
—
—
—
9,733,272
—
—
—
68
—
51,732
342
(2,958,166)
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
23,192
—
—
—
5,615
—
—
—
—
28,807
Accumulated
deficit
(2,828,302)
—
—
(1,650,189)
—
Total APGL
shareholders’
deficit
(4,447,154)
—
(1,347,923)
(1,650,189)
5,615
Non-
controlling
interests
4,575
—
—
(4,651)
—
Total
shareholders’
deficit
(4,442,579)
—
(1,347,923)
(1,654,840)
5,615
—
(20,205)
(29,825)
—
160
(4,508,156)
(29,825)
51,732
502
(7,437,447)
—
—
—
(254)
(330)
(20,205)
(29,825)
51,732
248
(7,437,777)
Balance as of March 31, 2016
Issuance of Series I CCPS
Accretion of CCPS
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss
Conversion of CCD and CCPS
Sale of stake in subsidiary
Accretion of redeemable non-controlling
interest
Share based compensation
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares
Balance as of March 31, 2017
Balance as of March 31, 2017 (US$)
(Note 2(d))
Preferred
shares
9,733,272
1,658,166
235,852
—
—
(11,627,290)
—
—
—
—
—
Equity
shares
68
—
—
—
—
738
—
—
—
267
1,073
Additional paid
in capital
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income
(2,958,166)
—
(235,852)
—
—
15,357,492
12,527
—
13,774
6,714,376
18,904,151
28,807
—
—
—
11,519
—
—
—
—
—
40,326
Accumulated
deficit
(4,508,156)
—
—
(1,172,645)
—
—
1,454
Total APGL
shareholders’
deficit
(7,437,447)
—
(235,852)
(1,172,645)
11,519
15,358,230
13,981
Non-
controlling
interests
(330)
—
—
(18,924)
—
—
1,323,983
Total
shareholders’
deficit
(7,437,777)
—
(235,852)
(1,191,569)
11,519
15,358,230
1,337,964
(44,073)
—
—
(5,723,420)
(44,073)
13,774
6,714,643
13,222,130
—
—
—
1,304,729
(44,073)
13,774
6,714,643
14,526,859
—
17
291,506
622
(88,256)
203,889
20,119
224,008
See accompanying notes.
F-7
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands)
Cash flow from operating activities
Net loss
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided from/(used in) operating activities:
Deferred income taxes
Depreciation and amortization
Change in fair value of CCD’s and Series E and G CCPS
Loss on disposal of property plant and equipment
Share based compensation
Amortization of debt financing costs
Realized gain on investments
Deferred rent
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Realized and unrealized foreign exchange (gain)/loss, net
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Other assets
Accounts payable
Interest payable
Deferred revenue
Other liabilities
Net cash flows provided from/ (used) in operating activities
Cash flow used in investing activities
Purchase of property plant and equipment
Purchase of software
Purchase of available for sale securities
Purchase of held to maturity securities
Sale of available for sale securities
Investment in subsidiary
Proceeds from sale of non-controlling interest in subsidiary
Net increase in restricted cash
Net cash flows used in investing activities
Cash from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of Series H CCPS
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares in IPO
Repayments of term and other loan
Proceeds from term and other loan
IPO cost incurred
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares of subsidiary
Proceeds from Series I
Proceeds from issuance of Series G CCPS
Proceeds from issuance of CCDS
Net cash flows from financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during the year for interest
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
Non-cash conversion of CCPS and CCD’s
2015
(INR)
Year ended March 31,
2017
2016
(INR)
(INR)
2017
US$
(1,088,590) (1,654,840)
(1,191,569)
(18,374)
61,179
322,430
286,300
5,416
7,428
22,090
(13,949)
12,170
947
299,628
299,078
687,781
671,826
6,183
51,732
52,762
(45,375)
19,914
34,478
343,137
(72,677)
(118,332)
(241,077)
(102,863)
23,407
85,299
334,514
(176,680)
(353,277)
(119,213)
(325,400)
126,754
70,243
952,641
(84,556)
733,868
383,250
1,046,565
164,200
4,340
13,774
114,085
(72,179)
59,500
—
(109,128)
(581,850)
(122,871)
(344,562)
18,902
63,187
193,285
333,881
(27,190)
5,910
16,138
2,532
67
212
1,759
(1,113)
918
—
(1,683)
(8,972)
(1,895)
(5,313)
291
974
2,980
5,148
(421)
—
(14,408)
(8,426,008) (9,096,996)
(7,020)
(913,991) (5,025,639)
(6,859)
927,940 5,071,014
(20,148)
316,929
(390,327)
(9,050,994) (9,159,046)
—
—
(624,527)
—
(11,151)
(15,421,498) (237,803)
(172)
(12,937,425) (199,498)
—
9,744,735 150,266
—
—
(51,178)
(21,944,262) (338,385)
—
—
(3,318,923)
68
—
1,549,010 3,695,407
248
—
(452,920) (3,490,810)
8,398,976 8,727,875
(9,007)
—
—
541,946
—
9,672,089 9,465,659
5,615
445,223 1,046,096
1,599,067 2,044,290
2,044,290 3,090,386
(3,045)
—
—
—
180,000
788
—
—
(942,824)
1,337,964
1,658,166
—
—
—
—
7,657,467 118,080
(6,373,210)
(98,276)
20,993,944 323,730
(14,539)
20,632
25,569
—
—
24,331,507 375,196
160
36,551
47,654
84,205
10,229
2,370,284
3,090,386
5,460,670
844,586 1,613,495
100,857
230,383
—
—
2,632,667
546,578
40,596
8,428
15,358,230 236,827
F-8
Table of Contents
1. Organization
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Azure Power Global Limited (“APGL” or “Azure”) organized under the laws of Mauritius was incorporated on January 30, 2015. APGL’s subsidiaries are
organized under the laws of India (except for two U.S. subsidiaries) and are engaged in the development, construction, ownership, operation, maintenance and
management of solar power plants and generation of solar energy based on long-term contracts (power purchase agreements or “PPA”) with Indian government
entities as well as other non-governmental energy distribution companies and commercial customers. APGL and its subsidiaries are hereinafter referred to as the
“Company”.
Formation and initial public offering (‘IPO’)
On October 17, 2016, the Company completed its Initial Public Offering (IPO) and a concurrent private placement of its equity shares pursuant to a
Registration Statement on Form F-1, as amended, which became effective on October 11, 2016. An aggregate of 2,242,424 shares were sold by APGL in the
offering along with 1,166,667 shares sold by the selling shareholders at a price of US$18.00 per share. Further, 4,166,667 shares were subscribed by CDPQ
Infrastructures Asia Pte Ltd., as part of a concurrent private placement at the same price. The IPO and the concurrent private placement resulted in aggregate
proceeds net of underwriters fees and other directly related expenses, of US$ 101.0 million.
Prior to the formation of APGL and the reorganization described below, the Company’s operations were entirely conducted through Azure Power India
Private Limited (“AZI”) and its subsidiaries. AZI is a company organized under the laws of India. APGL was formed to enable the consummation of the
transactions described below and the IPO.
In relation to a shareholders agreement on July 22, 2015 between APGL, the non-founder investors in AZI and the founders (the “APGL SHA”), APGL
purchased from the non-founder investors in AZI the equity shares and convertible securities in the form of Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (“CCDs”) and
Compulsorily Convertible Preferred Shares (“CCPS”) held by them in AZI for an equivalent number of equity shares, CCDs and CCPS in APGL on substantially
similar terms as those formerly held in AZI (the “Reorganization”).
Prior to the Reorganization, the non-founder investors had an 82.6% ownership interest, on an as converted basis (excluding the CCDS and CCPS which
convert into a variable and the indeterminable number of equity shares), in AZI with the remaining 17.4% held by the AZI founders. Subsequent to the
Reorganization, APGL held an 82.6% interest in AZI, on an as converted basis, with the remaining 17.4% held by the AZI founders. Pursuant to the IPO of APGL
in October 2016, the CCD’s and CCPS held by APGL in AZI were converted into equity shares. APGL holds 96.3% of AZI as on March 31, 2017, with the balance
being held by AZI founders.
On July 22, 2015, APGL, AZI and the founders entered into another shareholder’s agreement (the “AZI SHA”), which provides that it is the intention of all
parties to the AZI SHA to eventually make AZI a wholly owned subsidiary of APGL. As of March 31, 2017, the Company did not own 102,497 equity shares of
AZI, representing 3.7% of its equity shares. These equity shares are owned by the AZI founders. Pursuant to the terms of the AZI SHA and the Lock-in Agreement,
the AZI founders have surrendered, or transferred to APGL, their legal and economic rights associated with these equity shares and being a minority shareholder. In
connection therewith and also pursuant to the AZI SHA, the AZI founders and APGL have entered into an option whereby APGL may, at any time and without
time limit, cause the AZI founders to transfer their AZI equity shares to APGL for consideration equal to the minimum applicable price as per Indian law, with any
proceeds above the face value of such shares (INR 10 or US$0.15 per share) to be distributed among the AZI founders and non-founder investors (the former CCPS
holders) pro rata based on their as-converted shareholding in APGL. The option does not expire for a period of two years and no consideration was given for this
option. In addition, the AZI SHA prohibits a transfer of equity shares held by the founders without the consent of APGL.
F-9
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Given that the AZI SHA, the option and the Lock-in Agreement were purposely designed so that the equity shares held by the AZI founders will never have
governing or economic substance, no value, income or loss has been attributed to such non-controlling interest.
Mr. Inderpreet Wadhwa, IW Green Inc. and the non-founder investors entered into a Sponsor Lock-in Agreement (“Lock-in Agreement”) whereby IW Green
Inc., agreed to not dispose of the number of such number of shares of APGL held by it as would represent an equivalent percentage of the shareholding of founders’
shareholding in AZI. This obligation would continue until expiry or the occurrence of a termination event, as defined. In addition, pursuant to the Lock-in
Agreement, the amount for which the founders sell their shares in AZI (including any sale to APGL) above the face value of such shares (INR 10, or US$0.15, per
equity share) plus taxes and expenses incurred by the founders on the transfer of such shares is to be distributed among the founders and the non founders pro rata
based on their as converted shareholding in APGL that existed at the date of the agreement. The non-founder investors and founders have extended the lock in
period, including the period for sharing the excess returns till to a date two years from the completion of APGL’s IPO.
The APGL SHA, AZI SHA and their combined effect, including the call option and the Lock-In Agreement, replicated the founders and the non-founder
investor’s interests in AZI in APGL on a substantially cash neutral basis and without any gain/loss by one party at the expense of another party. To reflect the
economic substance of the APGL SHA, the AZI SHA and the Reorganization, the Company has prepared the consolidated financial statements as though it had
been combined with AZI since the earliest period presented, using the ‘pooling of interests method’ of accounting with the assets and liabilities of the entities
recorded at their historical carrying values. Similarly, no value has been attributed to the non-controlling interest still held by the AZI founders in AZI.
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
(a)
Basis of presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(“GAAP”) and are presented in Indian rupees (“INR”), unless otherwise stated. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of APGL and companies
which are directly or indirectly controlled by APGL. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. Certain balances
relating to prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
All share and per share amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the 16-for-1 stock split of the Company’s
equity shares that was effective on October 6, 2016.
(b)
Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs, expenses and comprehensive loss that are reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events, historical experience, actions the Company may undertake in
the future and on various other assumptions that are believed to be prudent and reasonable under the circumstances. Significant estimates and assumptions are used
for, but not limited to impairment and useful lives of property, plant and equipment, determination of asset retirement obligations, valuation of derivative
instruments, valuation of share based compensation, income taxes including
F-10
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
related valuation allowance, energy kilowatts expected to be generated over the entire term of certain PPAs and other contingencies and commitments. Although
these estimates are based upon management’s best knowledge of current events and actions, actual results could differ from these estimates, and such differences
may be material to the consolidated financial statements.
(c)
Foreign currency translation and transactions
The functional currency of APGL is the United States Dollar (“US$”) and reporting currency is Indian rupees (“INR”). The Company’s subsidiaries with
operations in India and the United States use their respective currencies as their functional currencies. The financial statements of APGL and its subsidiaries, other
than subsidiaries with functional currency of INR, are translated into INR using the exchange rate as of the balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and average
exchange rate for the year for income and expense items. Translation gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss as a
component of shareholders’ equity.
In the financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries, transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are measured and recorded in the
functional currency using the exchange rate in effect at the date of the transaction. At the balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date. All gains and losses
arising from foreign currency transactions are recorded in the determination of net income or loss during the year in which they occur.
Revenue, expense and cash flow items are translated using the average exchange rates for the respective year. The resulting gains and losses from such
translation are excluded from the determination of earnings and are recognized instead in accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a separate component of
shareholders’ equity/(deficit).
Realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction gains and losses, arising from exchange rate fluctuations on balances denominated in currencies other
than the functional currency of an entity, such as those resulting from the Company’s US dollar (“US$”) denominated borrowings, are included in ‘Loss on foreign
currency exchange, net’ in the consolidated statements of operations.
(d)
Convenience translation
Translation of balances in the consolidated balance sheets and the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity/(deficit)
and cash flows from INR into US$, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2017 are solely for the convenience of the readers and were calculated at the rate of
US$1.00 = INR 64.85, the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in non U.S. currencies, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York on March 31, 2017. No representation is made that the INR amounts could have been, or could be, converted, realized or settled into US$ at that
rate on March 31, 2017, or at any other rate.
(e)
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits with banks, term deposits and all other highly liquid investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition and that are readily convertible to cash. The Company has classified term deposits totaling INR
291,951 and INR 846,394 (US$ 13,052) at March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively, as cash and cash equivalents, because the Company has the ability to redeem
these deposits at any time subject to an immaterial interest rate forfeiture. All term deposits are readily convertible into known amount of cash with no more than
one day’s notice.
F-11
Table of Contents
(f)
Restricted cash
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Restricted cash consists of cash balances restricted as to withdrawal or usage and relates to cash used to collateralize bank letters of credit supporting the
purchase of equipment for solar power plants, bank guarantees issued in relation to the construction of the solar power plants within the timelines stipulated in
PPAs and for certain debt service reserves required under the Company’s loan agreements. Restricted cash is classified into current and non-current portions based
on the term of the deposit and the expiration date of the underlying restriction.
(g)
Investments
The Company determines the appropriate classification of investment securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation at each balance
sheet date. The investment securities held by the Company during the periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are classified as
available for sale (short-term investments) consisting of liquid mutual funds units and held-to-maturity investments (long-term investments) consisting of notes of
the Bank of Mauritius.
The Company accounts for its investments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 320, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. These investments are considered as available for sale and held to maturity. Investments classified as available for sale
are recorded at fair value, with the unrealized gains or losses, net of tax, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in the
consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity/(deficit). As of March 31, 2015, and 2016, the Company did not have any short-term available for sale securities and
as of March 31, 2017, the Company had INR 3,296,797 (US$ 50,837) as short term investments available for sale securities and unrealized gain of INR 31,774
(US$ 490) on such investments. Realized gains from the sale of available for sale securities during the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 were INR
13,949, INR 45,375 and INR 72,334 (US$ 1,115), respectively and proceeds from the sale of available for sale securities during the year ended March 31, 2015,
2016 and 2017 were INR 927,940, INR 5,071,014 and INR 9,744,735 (US$ 150,266), respectively.
Securities that the Company has positive intent and ability to hold till maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and stated at amortized cost. As of
March 31, 2016, and March 31, 2017, amortized cost of held to maturity investments were INR 6,785 and INR 6,631 (US$ 102) respectively. The maturity date of
the investment is February 3, 2020 (one to five years).
Realized gains and losses, and decline in value judged to be other than temporary on these investments are included in the consolidated statements of
operations. The cost of securities sold or disposed is determined on First in First Out (“FIFO”) method.
(h)
Accounts receivable
The Company’s accounts receivables are generated by selling energy to customers and are reported net of any allowance for uncollectible accounts. The
allowance for doubtful accounts is based on various factors, including the length of time receivables are past due, significant one-time events, the financial health of
customers and historical experience. The allowance for doubtful accounts at March 31, 2016 and 2017 was INR 44,478 and INR 44,478 (US$ 686). Accounts
receivable serve as collateral for borrowings under the working capital facility, described in Note 5.
F-12
Table of Contents
(i)
Deferred IPO cost
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The Company incurred underwriter fees, legal expenses, printing costs and other costs directly relating to its IPO of INR 966,947 (US$ 14,911). The
Company accounted for such costs under ASC 340-10-599-1 (SAB Topic 5A) “Expenses of the Offering” as incremental costs directly attributable to an offering of
equity shares. These costs were applied against the proceeds from the IPO.
(j)
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment represents the costs of completed and operational solar power plants, as well as the cost of furniture and fixtures, vehicles,
office and computer equipment, leasehold improvements, freehold land and construction in progress. Construction in progress represents the accumulated cost of
solar power plants that have not been placed into service at the date of the balance sheet. Construction in progress includes the cost of solar modules for which the
Company has taken legal title, civil engineering, electrical and other related costs incurred during the construction of a solar power plant. Construction in progress
is reclassified to property, plant and equipment when the project begins its commercial operations.
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line
method over the assets’ estimated useful lives as follows:
Plant and machinery (solar power plants)
Furniture and fixtures
Vehicles
Office equipment
Computers
25 years
5 years
5 years
5 years
3 years
Leasehold improvements to office facilities are depreciated over the shorter of the lease period or the estimated useful life of the improvement. Lease hold
improvements on the solar power plant sites are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or the remaining period of the PPAs undertaken with the respective
customer. Freehold land is not depreciated. Construction in progress is not depreciated until it is ready to be put to use.
Improvements to property, plant and equipment deemed to extend the useful economic life of an asset are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs that do not
improve efficiency or extend the estimated economic life of an asset are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized
interest
Interest incurred on funds borrowed to finance construction of solar power plants is capitalized until the plant is ready for its intended use.
The amount of interest capitalized during the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 was INR 155,012, INR 219,166 and INR 256,802 (US$ 3,960),
respectively.
(k)
Accounting for impairment of long-lived assets
The Company periodically evaluates whether events have occurred that would require revision of the remaining useful life of property, plant and equipment
and improvements, or render their carrying value not recoverable. If such circumstances arise, the Company uses an estimate of the undiscounted value of expected
F-13
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
future operating cash flows to determine whether the long-lived assets are impaired. If the aggregate undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of
the assets, the resulting impairment charge to be recorded is calculated based on the excess of the carrying value of the assets over the fair value of such assets, with
the fair value determined based on an estimate of discounted future cash flows, appraisals or other valuation techniques. There were no impairment charges related
to long-lived assets recognized during the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2017.
(l)
Leases and land use rights
Certain of the Company’s leases relate to leasehold land on which the solar power plants are constructed and for office facilities. Leases are reviewed for
capital or operating classification at their inception under the guidance of ASC Topic 840 Leases
. The expense for leases classified as operating leases is recorded
as rent expense on a straight-line basis, over the lease term, beginning with the date the Company has access to the property.
Land use rights represent lease prepayments to the lessor. Land use rights are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is provided to
write-off the cost of these prepayments on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease or the PPA, whichever is shorter.
The Company did not have any capital leases during any of the periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
(m) Asset retirement obligations (ARO)
Upon the expiration of a PPA or, if later, the expiration of the lease agreement for solar power plants located on leasehold land, the Company is required to
remove the solar power plant and restore the land. The Company records the fair value of the liability for the legal obligation to retire the asset in the period in
which the obligation is incurred, which is generally when the asset is constructed. When a new liability is recognized, the Company capitalizes it by increasing the
carrying amount of the related long-lived asset, which resulting ARO asset is depreciated over the remaining useful life of the solar power plant. The liability is
accreted and expensed to its present expected future value each period based on a credit adjusted risk free interest rate. Upon settlement of the obligation, the
Company eliminates the liability and, based on the actual cost to retire, may incur a gain or loss.
The Company’s asset retirement obligations were INR 94,301 and INR 242,980 (US$ 3,747) as of March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The accretion
expense incurred during the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 was INR 2,592, INR 6,109 and INR 9,329 (US$ 144), respectively. There was no
settlement of prior liabilities or revisions to the Company’s estimated cash flows as of March 31, 2017.
Beginning balance
Addition during the year
Liabilities settled during the year
Accretion expense during the year
Ending balance
F-14
2016
(INR)
70,942
17,250
—
6,109
94,301
2017
(INR)
94,301
139,350
—
9,329
242,980
2017
(US$)
1,454
2,149
—
144
3,747
Table of Contents
(n)
Software
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The Company capitalizes certain internal software development cost under the provision of ASC Topic 350-40 Internal-Use
Software
. As of March 31,
2017, the amount capitalized as software includes the cost of software licenses, as well as related implementation costs, which primarily relate to third party
consulting fees. Such license and implementation costs are capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives of three years using the straight-line method.
On an ongoing basis, the Company assesses the recoverability of its capitalized software intangible assets. Capitalized software costs determined to be
unrecoverable are expensed in the period in which the determination is made. As of March 31, 2017, all capitalized software was considered fully recoverable.
(o)
Debt financing costs
Financing costs incurred in connection with obtaining construction and term financing loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the respective loan
using the effective interest rate method. Amortization of debt financing costs is capitalized during construction and recorded as interest expense in the consolidated
statements of operations, following commencement of commercial operations of the respective solar power plants. In case of refinancing of existing loans, the
Company records the unamortized portion of debt financing costs as an expense and the cost of debt refinancing is deferred and amortized over the remaining term
of the refinanced loan.
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 — “Interest — Imputation of Interest (ASC Subtopic 835-30) — Simplifying the
Presentation of Debt Issuance Cost” which requires the discount or premium and debt issuance costs to be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from
the face amount of debt liability. The amendments in this update were effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015.
The Company has retrospectively adopted the change and presented the debt financing costs as a deduction from the current and non-current borrowings. The
retrospective adoption of this guidance had no impact to the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss or consolidated statements of cash
flows. Certain amounts in the prior year’s consolidated balance sheets have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. This has resulted in the
reclassification of current portion of debt financing cost totaling INR 51,935 at March 31, 2016.
Carrying value of debt financing costs as of March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017 were INR 438,172 and INR 909,131 (US$14,019) respectively.
Amortization of debt financing costs for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 was INR 22,090, INR 52,762 and INR 114,085 (US$1,759),
respectively.
(p)
Income taxes
Current income taxes are provided for in accordance with the laws of the relevant taxing authority. Income taxes are recorded under the asset and liability
method, as prescribed under ASC Topic 740
Income
Taxes
, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable
to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax base. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The Company establishes valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will
not be realized.
F-15
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The computation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. The Company applies a two-step
approach to recognize and measure uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”),
Accounting
for
Uncertainty
in
Income
Taxes
—
an
interpretation
of
ASC
Topic
740
. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence
indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second
step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Through March 31, 2017, the
Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits nor has it recognized any interest or penalties.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”. This guidance
requires entities to classify deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The guidance is effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods
presented. As permitted, the Company elected to early adopt this guidance on a retrospective basis and all deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as
non-current.
(q)
Employee benefits
Defined contribution plan
Eligible employees of the Company in India receive benefits from the Provident Fund, administered by the Government of India, which is a defined
contribution plan. Both the employees and the Company make monthly contributions to the Provident Fund equal to a specified percentage of the eligible
employees’ salary.
The Company has no further funding obligation under the Provident Fund, beyond the contributions elected or required to be made thereunder. Contributions
to the Provident Fund by the Company are charged to expense in the period in which services are rendered by the covered employees and amounted to INR 5,693,
INR 10,350 and INR 15,734 (US$ 243) for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
Defined benefit plan
Employees in India are entitled to benefits under the Gratuity Act, a defined benefit post-employment plan covering eligible employees of the Company.
This plan provides for a lump-sum payment to eligible employees at retirement, death, and incapacitation or on termination of employment, of an amount based on
the respective employee’s salary and tenure of employment. As of March 31, 2017, this plan is unfunded.
Current service costs for defined benefit plans are accrued in the period to which they relate. In accordance with ASC Topic 715,
Compensation
Retirement
Benefit
, the liability in respect of defined benefit plans is calculated annually by the Company using the projected unit credit method and amounted to INR 7,350
and INR 11,077 (US$ 171) as of March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Prior service cost, if any, resulting from an amendment to a plan is recognized and
amortized over the remaining period of service of the covered employees. Interest costs for the period ended March 31, 2016 and 2017 were not significant.
Compensated absences
The Company recognizes its liabilities for compensated absences in accordance with ASC Topic 710,
Compensation-General
. The Company accrues the
liability for its employee rights to compensated absence in the year in which it is earned.
F-16
Table of Contents
(r)
Revenue recognition
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Revenue from sale of power is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, solar energy kilowatts are
supplied and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is based on the solar energy kilowatts actually supplied to customers multiplied by the rate per kilo-watt
hour agreed to in the respective PPAs. The solar energy kilowatts supplied by the Company are validated by the customer prior to billing and recognition of
revenue.
Where PPAs include scheduled price changes, revenue is recognized at lower of the amount billed or by applying the average rate to the energy output
estimated over the term of the PPA. The determination of the lesser amount is undertaken annually based on the cumulative amount that would have been
recognized had each method been consistently applied from the beginning of the contract term. The Company estimates the total kilowatt hour units expected to be
generated over the entire term of the PPA. The contractual rates are applied to this annual estimate to determine the total estimated revenue over the term of the
PPA. The Company then uses the total estimated revenue and the total estimated kilo-watt hours to compute the average rate used to record revenue on the actual
energy output supplied. The Company compares the actual energy supplied to the estimate of the energy expected to be generated over the remaining term of the
PPA on a periodic basis, but at least annually. Based on this evaluation, the Company reassesses the energy output estimated over the remaining term of the PPA
and adjusts the revenue recognized and deferred to date. Through March 31, 2017, the adjustments have not been significant. The difference between actual billing
and revenue recognized is recorded as deferred revenue.
For the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, the amount of revenue recognized under the PPA’s with scheduled price changes is INR 175,492, INR
168,552 and INR 161,760 (US$ 2,494), respectively.
Revenue from sale of power is recorded net of discounts. Through March 31, 2017, discounts have not been significant.
The Company records the proceeds received from Viability Gap Funding (VGF) on fulfillment of the underlying conditions as deferred revenue. Such
deferred VGF revenue is recognized as sale of power in proportion to the actual sale of solar energy kilowatts during the period to the total estimated sale of solar
energy kilowatts during the tenure of the applicable power purchase agreement pursuant to the revenue recognition policy.
(s)
Cost of operations (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
The Company’s cost of operations consists of expenses pertaining to operations and maintenance of its solar power plants. These expenses include payroll
and related costs for maintenance staff, plant maintenance, insurance, and if applicable, lease costs.
Depreciation expense is not included in cost of operations but is included within “Depreciation and amortization expense”, shown separately in the
consolidated statements of operations.
(t)
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses include payroll and related costs for corporate, finance and other support staff, including bonus and share based
compensation expense, professional fees and other corporate expenses.
F-17
Table of Contents
(u)
Share based compensation
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The Company follows guidance under ASC Topic 718,
Compensation
—
Stock
Compensation
, which requires compensation costs related to share-based
transactions, including employee share options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value. The Company recognizes compensation
expense for equity share options net of estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. Share-based compensation is included in general and administrative expenses and recognized in the consolidated statements
of operations based on awards ultimately expected to vest.
The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model to determine the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant for
employee share options with a fixed exercise price and fixed service-based vesting.
The Company has elected to use the Lattice valuation model to determine the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant for employee share
options with a market condition.
Refer to note 19 for details on the Share based compensation.
(v)
Contingencies
Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, tax assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs incurred with respect to these items are
expensed as incurred.
(w) Fair value of financial instruments
ASC Topic 820,
Fair
Value
Measurements
and
Disclosures
, defines fair value as the price at which an asset could be exchanged or a liability transferred in
an orderly transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Where available, fair value is
based on observable market prices or derived from such prices. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation
techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market
and the instruments’ complexity.
(x)
Derivative instruments
Derivative instruments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated as accounting hedges
are reported directly in earnings along with the corresponding transaction gains and losses on the items being hedged. The Company enters into foreign exchange
currency contracts to mitigate and manage the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates. These foreign exchange derivative contracts were entered into to hedge the
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates for recognized balance sheet items such as the Company’s U.S. dollar denominated borrowings and are not designated as
hedges for accounting purposes. Realized gains (losses) and changes in the fair value of these foreign exchange derivative contracts are recorded in foreign
exchange gains (losses), net in the consolidated statements of operations. These derivatives are not held for speculative or trading purposes.
F-18
Table of Contents
(y)
Segment information
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Operating segments are defined as components of a company about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief
operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief executive officer is
the chief operating decision maker. Based on the financial information presented to and reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate
the resources and in assessing the performance of the Company, the Company has determined that it has a single operating and reporting segment: Sale of power.
The Company’s principal operations, revenue and decision-making functions are located in India.
(z)
Non-controlling interest
The non-controlling interest recorded in the financial statements relates to (i) a 20% ownership in a subsidiary (10MW Gujarat Power Plant) not held by the
Company, (ii) a 48.37% ownership in a subsidiary (150MW Punjab Power Plant) not held by the Company, and (iii) a 49% ownership in a subsidiary on an as
converted basis (50MW Uttar Pradesh Power Plant) not held by the Company.
As of March 31, 2017, the Company recorded a non-controlling interest amounting to INR 1,304,729 (US$ 20,119) including INR 18,924 (US$ 292) of net
loss for the year. As of March 31, 2016, the Company recorded a non-controlling deficit amounting to INR 330, including loss of INR 4,651 for the year Net loss
attributable to non-controlling interest for the year ended March 31, 2015 was INR 5,595.
(aa) Redeemable non-controlling interest
The redeemable non-controlling interest recorded in the financial statements relates to a 29% ownership in a subsidiary (50MW Andhra Pradesh Power
Plant) not held by the Company. The investor representing the redeemable non-controlling interest has a put option to sell its equity interest to the Company for
cash at the lower of fair value or a return of 11.5% after March 5, 2019. This non-controlling interest is considered to be redeemable equity under ASC
480-10-S99-3A and accordingly it is classified as “mezzanine” equity in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company has adjusted the carrying
amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest to its expected redemption value of INR 346,754 and INR 390,827 (US$ 6,027) at March 31, 2016 and 2017
respectively, based on the guaranteed return which is less than fair value.
bb) Recent accounting pronouncements
Beginning April 1, 2017, the Company has irrevocably elected to follow public company effective dates for new accounting pronouncements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, ‘‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).’’ This guidance supersedes current guidance on
revenue recognition in Topic 605, ‘‘Revenue Recognition.” In addition, there are disclosure requirements related to the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of
revenue recognition. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No.2015-14 to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities by one year. The core
principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity is required to follow five
steps which comprises of (a) identifying the contract(s) with a customer; (b) identifying the performance obligations in the contract; (c) determining the transaction
price; (d) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (e) recognizing revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a
F-19
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
performance obligation. The deferral resulted in the new revenue standard being effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
after December 15, 2017 (April 1, 2018 for the Company). The Company has the option of adopting the new revenue standard using either one of two methods:
(i) retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within ASU No. 2014-09; or
(ii) retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU No. 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application and providing certain additional
disclosures as defined per ASU No. 2014-09.
The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard update. The ultimate impact on revenue resulting from the application of the new
standard will be subject to assessments that are dependent on many variables, including, but not limited to, the terms of contractual arrangements. The Company
also continues to evaluate the available transition methods and its contractual arrangements. The Company’s considerations include, but are not limited to, the
comparability of its financial statements and the comparability within its industry from application of the new standard to its contractual arrangements. The
Company plans to select a transition method by December 2017. The Company has established an implementation team to implement the standard update related to
the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. The Company continues to evaluate the changes to accounting system and processes, and additional
disclosure requirements that may be necessary.
On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 (“ASU 2016-01”), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which
amends certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. This amendment requires all equity investments to be
measured at fair value, with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under equity method of accounting or those
that result in consolidation of the investee). This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (April 1, 2018 for the Company),
including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases. ASU 2016-02 specifies the accounting for leases. For leases that were formerly
classified as operating, ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease
payments, in its balance sheet. The standard also requires a lessee to recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease
term, on a generally straight-line basis. In addition, this standard requires both lessees and lessors to disclose certain key information about lease transactions. ASU
2016-02 is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018 (April 1, 2019
for the Company), including interim periods within those fiscal years using the modified retrospective method, which will require adjustment to all comparative
periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial
statements and the approach to be used.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation — Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting, which relates to the accounting for employee share-based payments. This standard addresses several aspects of the accounting for share-
based payment award transactions, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the
statement of cash flows; (d) accounting for forfeitures of share-based payments. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016
(April 1, 2017 for the Company), including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on
its consolidated financial statements.
F-20
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows — Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which clarifies the
presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are an improvement to GAAP because
they provide guidance for each of the eight issues, thereby reducing the current and potential future diversity in practice. This guidance is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (April 1, 2018 for the Company), and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be
applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company does not expect this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, to require the recognition of the income tax
effects from an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with
early adoption permitted. Adoption of the ASU is based on a modified retrospective method. The Company intends to early adopt the ASU fiscal year beginning
April 1, 2017 and early adoption will result in recognition of deferred tax asset on the income taxes paid on the intra entity transfer of assets to the extent these are
expected to be realized by the subsidiary outside of the tax holiday period. The Company believes on early adoption of this guidance, tax expense is expected to be
lower and accordingly its profit after tax is likely to increase as it will result in recognition of deferred tax assets on intra-entity transfer of assets is likely to be
higher than the prepaid taxes it could have recognize earlier.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of cash flows — Restricted cash. The amendments apply to all entities that have restricted
cash or restricted cash equivalents and are required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 230. The amendments in this update require that a statement of
cash flows should explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash
equivalents. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017 (April 1, 2018 for the Company) and interim periods within those
annual periods. Early adoption is permitted with an adjustment reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the amendment is adoption. The Company
does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have any effect on its financial position or results of operations.
3. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:
Bank demand deposits
Term deposits
Cash on hand
Total
As of March 31,
2016
(INR)
2,798,336
291,951
99
3,090,386
2017
(INR)
4,614,158
846,394
118
5,460,670
2017
(US$)
71,151
13,052
2
84,205
F-21
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
4. Restricted cash
Restricted cash consists of the following:
Bank demand deposits
Term deposits
Restricted cash — current
Restricted cash — non-current
March 31, 2016
(INR)
821,891
871,637
1,693,528
821,891
871,637
As of March 31,
2017
(INR)
3,629,037
1,383,414
5,012,451
3,629,037
1,383,414
2017
(US$)
55,960
21,333
77,293
55,960
21,333
The increase in the restricted cash balance from March 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017 is due to an increase in Company’s solar power plant construction
activities, which in turn has resulted in increased borrowing needs and an increase in the respective restricted cash required by the lenders to cover principal and
interest payments and letters of credit needed to purchase solar panels.
5. Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable, net consists of the following:
Accounts receivable
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
Total
Activity for the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is as follows:
Balance at the beginning of the year
Provision for doubtful accounts
Balance at the end of the year
F-22
2016
(INR)
As of March 31,
2017
(INR)
601,233
(44,478)
556,755
1,183,083
(44,478)
1,138,605
2017
(US$)
18,243
(685)
17,558
As of March 31,
2016
(INR)
10,000
34,478
44,478
2017
(INR)
44,478
—
44,478
2017
(US$)
685
—
685
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
6. Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
Prepaid income taxes
Derivative instruments (Note 21)
Interest receivable on term deposits
Other prepaid expenses
Total
7. Property, plant and equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment, net consist of the following:
Plant and machinery (solar power plants)
Furniture and fixtures
Vehicles
Office equipment
Computers
Leasehold improvements — solar power plant
Leasehold improvements — office
Less: Accumulated depreciation
Freehold land
Construction in progress
Total
As of March 31,
March 31, 2016
(INR)
91,669
108,606
27,731
80,001
308,007
2017
(INR)
156,728
63,818
63,352
212,039
495,937
2017
(US$)
2,416
984
977
3,270
7,647
Estimated
Useful Life
(in years)
25
5
5
5
3
25
1-3
March 31,
As of March 31,
2016
(INR)
21,330,457
5,142
12,633
10,645
19,812
1,436,256
13,694
22,828,639
1,450,519
21,378,120
527,645
2,475,664
24,381,429
2017
(INR)
35,664,766
6,043
13,177
15,926
29,827
2,434,449
19,010
38,183,198
2,484,595
35,698,603
1,421,912
3,822,093
40,942,608
2017
(US$)
549,958
93
203
246
460
37,540
293
588,793
38,313
550,480
21,926
58,937
631,343
Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment was INR 318,411, INR 679,698 and INR 1,036,029 (US$ 15,976) for the years ended March 31,
2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
The Company has received government grants for the construction of rooftop projects amounting to INR 11,700, INR 16,900 and INR Nil for the years
ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The proceeds from these grants have been recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the related rooftop
projects.
F-23
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
8. Software, net consists of the following:
Software licenses and related implementation costs
Less: Accumulated amortization
Total
Estimated
Useful Life
(in years)
3 Years
March 31,
March 31,
2016
(INR)
27,688
13,031
14,657
2017
(INR)
38,839
23,567
15,272
2017
(US$)
599
364
235
Aggregate amortization expense for software was INR 4,019, INR 8,083 and INR 10,536 (US$ 162) for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017,
respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for the years ending March 31, 2018, 2019, and 2020 is INR 8,301, INR 4,504, INR 2,467, respectively.
9. Other assets
Other assets consist of the following:
Prepaid income taxes
Derivative instruments (Note 21)
Interest receivable on term deposits
Security deposit to related party (Note 18)
Land use rights
Prepaid expenses
Other
Total
March 31,
2016
(INR)
288,771
83,426
85,154
8,567
91,218
—
38,765
595,901
As of March 31,
2017
(INR)
666,574
61,120
128,678
2,160
114,178
32,806
88,049
1,093,565
2017
(US$)
10,279
942
1,984
33
1,761
506
1,358
16,863
F-24
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
10. Long term debt
Long term debt consists of the following:
Compulsorily convertible debentures 5.0% — DEG
Compulsorily convertible debentures 10.0% — IFC
Compulsorily convertible debentures 0% — IFC II
Compulsorily convertible debentures 5% — IFC III
Series E compulsorily convertible preferred shares (140,000 shares)
Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares (18,882 shares)
Secured term loans, net of financing costs:
Foreign currency loans
Indian rupee loans
Total debt
Less current portion
Long-term debt
Compulsorily convertible debentures (CCDs)
March 31,
2016
(INR)
1,272,400
478,900
140,100
241,100
837,300
630,900
3,600,700
As of March 31,
2017
(INR)
2017
(US$)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5,889,467
13,340,243
19,229,710
22,830,410
4,477,696
18,352,714
5,385,949
27,311,619
32,697,568
32,697,568
1,554,806
31,142,762
83,052
421,151
504,203
504,203
23,975
480,228
Pursuant to the IPO in October 2016, the Company converted of all the CCD’s (DEG, IFC, IFC II and IFC III CCDs) which had guaranteed returns ranging
from 18.4 % per annum to 20.0% per annum into 1,826,305 equity shares. The CCD’s converted contained the following terms and conditions:
Voting
The holders of the CCDs were entitled to voting rights other than for certain specific matters based on their proportionate voting rights as defined and
specified in the shareholder and CCD agreements.
Term
Unless converted, the DEG, IFC, IFC II and IFC III CCDs matured 20 years from the date of the respective issuance being November 10,
2031, December 14, 2030, January 3, 2033 and September 5, 2034, respectively.
Interest
The DEG CCDs carried an interest rate of 5.0% per annum through the date of their conversion into equity shares of the Company. The first interest payment
was eighteen months from the issuance date followed by quarterly payments until the earlier of the date of conversion or maturity.
The IFC CCDs carried an interest rate of 10.0% per annum through the date of their conversion into equity shares of the Company. The first interest payment
was eighteen months from the issuance date followed by quarterly payments until the earlier of the date of conversion or maturity.
F-25
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The IFC II CCDs did not carry an annual interest rate. However, if any dividends were paid to equity shareholders or the holders of the Compulsorily
Convertible Preferred Shares (“CCPS”), the IFC II holders were entitled to interest/dividends equal to the return provided to the equity shareholders or the CCPs
shareholders, whichever is higher.
The IFC III CCDs carried an interest at a rate of 5.0% per annum through the date of their conversion into equity shares of the Company. The first interest
payment was eighteen months from the issuance date followed by quarterly payments until the earlier of the date of conversion or maturity.
The CCDs converted upon the Company’s IPO at a price such that the holder earned an internal rate of return ranging from 18.4% per annum to 20.0% per
annum.
Buyback
obligation
In case Company was not able to complete the Qualified Initial Public Offering (“QIPO”) date of December 31, 2016, or upon a breach of the funding
requirements of the CCD holders or upon the occurrence of a liquidation event, as defined, the holders of the CCDs had an option, at their discretion, to require the
Company to buyback the equity shares held by them after the conversion of their CCDs into equity shares so as to give them their required returns ranging from
18.4% per annum to 20.0% per annum.
As of March 31, 2016, these debentures were held by AGPL and the QIPO date was modified to December 31, 2016. The CCDs amounting to
INR 2,132,500 had been classified as current liability assuming redemption at or before the modified QIPO date.
Accounting
In accordance with ASC Topic 480
Distinguishing
Liabilities
from
Equity
, the CCDs were recorded at their respective fair values at period end. The fair
value was determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis under the income approach. Changes in their fair value were recorded as interest expense in the
statements of operations. The carrying amount of the CCDs included the unrealized changes in the fair value of INR 950,490 as of March 31, 2016. Issuance costs
on the CCDs were expensed as incurred.
Interest expense, including changes to fair value, on the CCDs for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 was INR 248,831, INR 408,172, and INR
90,360 (US$ 1,392), respectively.
Series E and Series G Compulsorily Convertible Preferred Shares (Series E and G CCPS)
Pursuant to the IPO in October 2016, the Company has converted the Series E and Series G CCPS into 1,286,598 equity shares so as to give the holders their
guaranteed returns of 18.4% per annum.
On April 18, 2013, AZI had issued shares of Series E CCPS for net proceeds of INR 491,400 (US$7,935). On July 25, 2015, the Series E CCPS in AZI were
exchanged for similar instruments in APGL having identical terms and conditions. On August 5, 2015, APGL issued shares of Series G CCPS for net proceeds of
INR 541,946 (US$8,188).
Series E and G CCPS contained the following key terms and conditions, as amended.
F-26
Table of Contents
Voting
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The holders of the Series E and G CCPS were not entitled to voting rights other than for certain specific matters based on their proportionate voting right as
defined and specified in the shareholder and the Series E and G CCPS agreements.
Term
Series E and G CCPS were redeemable within twenty years from the date of their respective allotment on April 18, 2033 and August 5, 2035, respectively
Dividend
Each of the Series E and G CCPS holders were entitled to a 5.0% per share non-cumulative dividend, declared and paid in accordance with the Indian
Companies Act of 2013. Should the equity or the Series A, B, C, D, F or H CCPS holder in any financial year received a dividend payout higher than 5% per
annum of the amount invested by such investors, the Series E and G CCPS holders were entitled to receive an additional dividend equal to the difference between
the percentage return earned by the equity or the Series A, B, C, D, F or H CCPS holders and the rate of dividends received by the Series E and G CCPS holders.
The Company had not declared or paid any dividends through March 31, 2017.
Buyback
obligation
At any time after the expiry of the QIPO date of December 31, 2016, or if the funding covenants of the Series E and G CCPS are breached, the Series E and
G CCPS holders had an option, at their discretion, to require the Company to buyback the equity shares held by them after conversion of the Series E and G CCPS
into equity shares so as to give them a required return of 15.0% per annum and 16.0% per annum, respectively.
Accounting
In accordance with ASC Topic 480, the Series E and G CCPS were classified as a liability and recorded at fair value at each period end. The fair value had
been determined based on the discounted cash flow analysis under the income approach. Changes in their fair valuation were recorded as interest expense in the
statements of operations. The carrying amount of series E and G CCPS included the unrealized changes in their fair value of INR 434,901 as of March 31, 2016.
Issuance costs on the CCPS were expensed as incurred. As of March 31, 2016, the Series E and G CCPS were classified as current liabilities and converted into
equity shares as of March 31, 2017.
Project level secured term loans
Foreign
currency
loans
From June 2009 through September 2009 the Company borrowed INR 309,631 (US$6,230) for the financing of a 2 MW solar power project, which carries a
fixed interest rate. The loan is repayable in 48 equal quarterly installments which commenced on December 15, 2010. The borrowing is collateralized by the
underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 292,986 (US$ 4,518) as of March 31, 2017.
From February 2011 through June 2011, the Company borrowed INR 1,233,084 (US$26,835) for the financing of a 10 MW solar power project, which
carries a fixed interest rate. The loan is repayable in 54 equal
F-27
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
quarterly installments which commenced on September 15, 2012. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying
value of INR 1,082,182 (US$ 16,687) as of March 31, 2017.
From October 2011 through March 2012, the Company borrowed INR 782,793 (US$15,777) for the financing of a 5 MW solar power project, which carries
a fixed interest rate. The loan is repayable in 66 quarterly installments commencing July 15, 2012. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power
project assets with a net carrying value of INR 618,188 (US$ 9,533) as of March 31, 2017.
From October 2012 through September 2013, the Company borrowed INR 3,503,984 (US$63,709) for the financing of a 35 MW solar power project, which
carries a fixed interest rate. The loan is repayable in 36 semi-annual installments which commenced on August 20, 2013. The borrowing is collateralized by
underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 2,897,230 (US$ 44,676) as of March 31, 2017.
The fixed interest foreign currency loans carry an interest rate ranging from 4.07% to 6.43% per annum.
During the year ended March 31, 2015, the Company entered into an unsecured credit facility commitment for financing future rooftop solar power projects.
The total amount of the facility is INR 1,326,658 (US$20,000). The interest rate for the facility is fixed at lender’s base rate plus 2.25% per annum at the time of
first disbursement. The loan is repayable in 54 quarterly installments which will commence on October 15, 2017. During the period ended March 31, 2017, an
amount of INR 49,077 (US$ 757) at an interest rate of 4.42% has been borrowed under this facility and the Company has incurred deferred financing cost of INR
17,640 (US$ 272) in relation to this facility. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 47,389
(US$ 731) as of March 31, 2017.
The carrying value of the foreign currency loans includes unrealized foreign exchange losses of INR 1,580,504 and INR 1,560,068 (US$ 24,057) as of
March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
The Company in required to maintain principal and interest, both as defined in the respective agreements, as a reserve with banks specified by the respective
lenders. Such amounts, totaling INR 418,572 and INR 436,239 (US$ 6,727) at March 31, 2016 and 2017, are classified as restricted cash non-current on the
consolidated balance sheets.
The foreign currency loans are subject to certain financial and non-financial covenants. Financial covenants include cash flow to debt service, indebtedness
to net worth ratio, debt equity ratio and maintenance of debt service balances. As of March 31, 2017, the Company is in compliance with all such covenants.
Indian
rupee
loans
The Indian rupee loans are subject to certain financial and non-financial covenants. Financial covenants include cash flow to debt service ratio, indebtedness
to net worth ratio, debt equity ratio, debt service coverage ratio, receivable to sales ratio and maintenance of debt service balances. As of March 31, 2017, the
Company is in compliance with all such covenants.
In December 2013, the Company borrowed INR 143,740 (US$2,195) for the financing of a 2.5 MW solar power project, which carries an interest rate of
12.15% per annum to be periodically revised by the lender. The interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 12.15% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for
the year ended March 31, 2017 was 12.15% per annum. The loan is repayable in 29 semi-annual installments which commenced on January 15, 2014. The
borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 141,911 (US$ 2,188) as of March 31, 2017.
F-28
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
From March 2014 through March 2016, the Company borrowed INR 228,848 (US$ 3,454) for financing of a 4 MW solar rooftop power project, which
carries an interest rate at a base rate, as defined, plus 2.25% per annum. The interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 11.95% per annum and the weighted average
interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.95% per annum. The loan is repayable in 54 quarterly installments commencing on March 28, 2015. The
borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar rooftop power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 239,012 (US$ 3,686) as of March 31, 2017.
From March 2014 through September 2014, the Company borrowed INR 1,880,000 (US$28,702) for financing of a 34 MW solar power project, which has
been refinanced by new loan amounting to INR 1,740,000 (US$ 26,831) during September, 2016. The unamortized carrying value of ancillary cost of borrowing as
on the date of refinancing of INR 35,014 (US$ 540) has been expensed as interest expense during the period. The floating interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was
10.6% — 11.0% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.58% per annum. The loan is repayable in 70 equal
quarterly installments commencing October 1, 2016. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR
1,772,555 (US$27,333) as of March 31, 2017.
In September 2014, the Company borrowed INR 550,000 (US$8,397) for financing of a 10 MW solar power project, which carries a floating rate of interest
at a base rate, as defined, plus 2.25% per annum. The floating interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 11.25% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for
the year ended March 31, 2017 was 12.14% per annum. The loan is repayable in 44 quarterly installments commencing January 27, 2016. The borrowing is
collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 539,974 (US$ 8,327) as of March 31, 2017
From November 2014 through January 2015, the Company borrowed INR 585,000 (US$ 8,931) for financing of a 10 MW solar power project, which carries
a floating rate of interest to be periodically revised by the lender. The floating interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 11.25% per annum and the weighted average
interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 12.14% per annum. The loan is repayable in 58 quarterly installments commencing January 17, 2016. The
borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 576,958 (US$ 8,897) as of March 31, 2017.
From May 2015 through June 2015, the Company borrowed INR 1,601,000 (US$24,188) for financing of a 30 MW solar power project, which carries a
floating rate of interest at a base rate plus 1.5% per annum. The floating interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 11.75% per annum and the weighted average
interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.75% per annum. The loan is repayable in 57 quarterly instalments commencing March 31, 2016. The
borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 1,665,521 (US$ 25,683) as of March 31, 2017.
From December 2014 through September 2015, the Company borrowed INR 2,050,000 (US$30,971) for financing of a 40 MW solar power project, which
carries a floating rate of interest which will reset after every 2 years from the date of commissioning. The interest rate as of March 31, 2017 from a consortium of
lenders was in the range of 11.43 % per annum to 12.25 % per annum floating with additional 1% per annum interest during the construction period. The weighted
average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.98 % per annum. The loan is repayable in 57 quarterly instalments commencing October 15, 2015.
The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 2,067,759 (US$ 31,885) as of March 31, 2017.
From December 2014 through September 2015, the Company borrowed INR 2,363,100 (US$35,702) for financing of a 40 MW solar power project, which
carries a floating rate of interest which will reset after every
F-29
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
2 years from the date of commissioning. The interest rate as of March 31, 2017 from a consortium of lenders was 12.25% per annum floating with additional
1% per annum interest during construction period. The weighted average interest rate for the year March 31, 2017 was 12.25% per annum. The loan is repayable in
48 quarterly instalments commencing May 31, 2016. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR
2,380,771 (US$ 36,712) as of March 31, 2017.
From December 2014 through September 2015, the Company borrowed INR 1,173,500 (US$17,729) for financing of a 20 MW solar power project, which
carries a floating rate of interest which will reset after every 2 years from the date of commissioning. The interest rate as of March 31, 2017 from a consortium of
lenders was 12.25% per annum floating with additional 1% per annum interest during the construction period. The weighted average interest rate for the year ended
March 31, 2017 was 12.25% per annum. The loan is repayable in 48 quarterly instalments commencing May 31, 2016. The borrowing is collateralized by the
underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 1,186,929 (US$ 18,303) as of March 31, 2017.
In September 2015, the Company borrowed INR 1,233,000 (US$18,824) for financing of a 28 MW solar power project, which has been refinanced by new
loan amounting to INR 1,600,000 (US$ 24,672) during August, 2016. The unamortized carrying value of ancillary cost of borrowing as on the date of refinancing
of INR 23,159 (US$ 357) has been expensed as interest expense during the period. The floating interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 11.00% per annum and the
weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.38% per annum. The loan is repayable in 72 quarterly installments commencing
October 1, 2016. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 1,419,299 (US$ 21,886) as of
March 31, 2017.
In January 2016, the Company borrowed INR250,000 (US$ 3,774) for financing of a 5 MW solar power project, which carries a floating rate of interest
which will be subject to revision on expiry of every 2 years as per the interest guidelines of IREDA. The rate of interest is 11.4% and the weighted average interest
rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.4% per annum with additional interest during construction period of 0.5% per annum. The loan is repayable in 48
monthly installments commencing March 31, 2017. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR
299,643 (US$ 4,621) as of March 31, 2017.
From January 2016 through March 2016, the Company borrowed INR2,562,300 (US$ 39,511) for financing of a 50 MW solar power project, which carries a
floating rate of interest at a base rate, as defined, minus 2.55% per annum. The floating interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 10.95% per annum and the weighted
average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.77% per annum. The loan is repayable in 65 quarterly installments commencing June 30, 2017. The
borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 2,952,478 (US$ 45,528) as of March 31, 2017.
From April 2016 through May 2016, the Company borrowed INR 463,050 (US$ 7,140) for financing of a 10 MW solar power project. The floating interest
rate as of March 31, 2017 was 12.15% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 12.15% per annum. The loan is
repayable in 56 quarterly installments commencing October 1, 2016. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net
carrying value of INR 622,670 (US$ 9,602) as of March 31, 2017.
From May 2016 through March 2017, the Company borrowed INR 538,100 (US$ 8,298) for financing of a 10 MW solar power project. The floating interest
rate as of March 31, 2017 was 11.35% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.35% per annum. The loan is
repayable in 60 quarterly installments commencing June 30, 2017. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying
value of INR 598,902 (US$ 9,235) as of March 31, 2017.
F-30
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
From August 2016 through March 2017, the Company borrowed INR 5,981,800 (US$ 92,241) for financing of a 150 MW solar power project. The floating
interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 10.50% — 11.25% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.25% per
annum. The loan is repayable in 66 quarterly installments commencing December 31, 2017. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project
assets with a net carrying value of INR 6,304,848 (US$ 97,222) as of March 31, 2017.
In November 2016, the Company borrowed INR 261,400 (US$ 4,031) for financing of a 14 MW solar power project. The floating interest rate as of
March 31, 2017 was 11.20% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.20% per annum. The loan is repayable in
55 quarterly installments commencing June 30, 2018. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR
296,518 (US$ 4,572) as of March 31, 2017.
From October 2016 through February 2017, the Company borrowed INR 1,293,472 (US$ 19,946) for financing of a 40 MW solar power project from
consortium of lenders. The floating interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 10.35% — 11.75% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended
March 31, 2017 was 11.04% per annum. The loan is repayable in 64 quarterly installments commencing January 15, 2017. The borrowing is collateralized by the
underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 2,377,467 (US$ 36,661) as of March 31, 2017.
From October 2016 through November 2016, the Company borrowed INR 1,315,371 (US$ 20,283) for financing of a 40 MW solar power project from
consortium of lenders. The floating interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 10.35% — 11.75% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended
March 31, 2017 was 10.93% per annum. The loan is repayable in 64 quarterly installments commencing January 15, 2017. The borrowing is collateralized by the
underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR 2,145,837 (US$ 33,089) as of March 31, 2017.
In November 2016, the Company borrowed INR 356,250 (US$ 5,493) for financing of a 7 MW solar power project. The floating interest rate as of March 31,
2017 was 11.25% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.25% per annum. The loan is repayable in 63
quarterly installments commencing October 1, 2017. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR
415,359 (US$ 6,405) as of March 31, 2017.
In March 2017, the Company borrowed INR 1,000,000 (US$ 15,420) for financing of a 100 MW solar power project. The floating interest rate as of
March 31, 2017 was 11.00% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.00% per annum. The loan is repayable in
74 quarterly installments commencing September 30, 2018. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value
of INR 396,337 (US$ 6,112) as of March 31, 2017.
In March 2017, the Company borrowed INR 825,000 (US$ 12,722) for financing of a 50 MW solar power project. The floating interest rate as of March 31,
2017 was 11.25% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.25% per annum. The loan is repayable in 63
quarterly installments commencing September 30, 2018. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of
INR 899,177 (US$ 13,865) as of March 31, 2017.
In March 2017, the Company borrowed INR 375,000 (US$ 5,783) for financing of a 10 MW solar power project. The floating interest rate as of March 31,
2017 was 10.75% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 10.75% per annum. The loan is repayable in 37
quarterly
F-31
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
installments commencing September 30, 2017. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project assets with a net carrying value of INR
567,092 (US$ 8,745) as of March 31, 2017.
In March 2017, the Company borrowed INR 2,300,000 (US$ 35,466) for financing of a 100 MW solar power project from consortium of lenders. The
floating interest rate as of March 31, 2017 was 10.75% —12.00% per annum and the weighted average interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2017 was 11.88%
per annum. The loan is repayable in 73 quarterly installments commencing June 30, 2018. The borrowing is collateralized by the underlying solar power project
assets with a net carrying value of INR 2,228,308 (US$ 34,361) as of March 31, 2017.
As of March 31, 2017, the Company has unused commitments for long-term financing arrangements amounting to INR 16,227,730 (US$ 250,235) for solar
power projects.
For certain of the Indian rupee loans, two of the directors of the Company have provided personal guarantees in favor of the lenders and have also pledged
part of their shareholding with these lenders.
Short
term
loan
facilities
Facility
1
In September 2015, the Company entered into a revolving credit facility in the amount of INR 1,000,000 (US$15,108). Borrowings under this facility are
repayable within 12 months of disbursement. Two directors of AZI have given personal guarantees in favor of the lenders. The Company has also pledged
shareholding of two project subsidiaries.
In November 2015, the Company borrowed INR 480,000 (US$7,334) for financing a 10 MW solar power project. The weighted average interest rate for the
year ended March 31, 2017 was 13.25% per annum. The loan is repayable within 12 months from the date of 1st disbursement for the project and is further
collateralized by the assets created from the respective disbursement. The borrowing has been repaid during the year and no amounts are outstanding under this
facility at March 31, 2017.
In December 2015, the Company borrowed INR 418,000 (US$6,320) for financing a 10 MW solar power project. The weighted average interest rate for the
year ended March 31, 2017 was 13.25% per annum. The loan is repayable within 12 months from the date of first disbursement for the project and is further
collateralized by the assets created from the respective disbursement. The borrowing has been repaid during the year and no amounts are outstanding under this
facility at March 31, 2017.
Facility
2
In February 2016, the Company borrowed INR 375,000 (US$5,660) for financing a 10 MW solar power project. The weighted average interest rate for the
year ended March 31, 2017 was 13.25% per annum. The loan is repayable within 12 months from the date of disbursement for the project and is collateralized by
the assets created from the disbursement. The borrowing has been repaid during the year and no amounts are outstanding under this facility at March 31, 2017
Facility
3
In February 2017, the Company borrowed INR 2,500,000 (US$ 38,551) for financing a 100 MW solar power project. The interest rate as of March 31, 2017
was 12.75% per annum. The loan is repayable within 12 months from the date of disbursement for the project and is collateralized by the assets created from the
disbursement.
F-32
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
From time to time, the Company is required to maintain principal and interest, both as defined in the respective agreements, as a form of collateral with
banks specified by the respective lenders. Such amounts, totaling INR 918,690 (US$ 14,166) as of March 31, 2016, are classified as restricted cash on the
consolidated balance sheets. Generally, under the terms of the loan agreements entered into by the Company’s project subsidiaries, the project subsidiaries are
restricted from paying dividends to APGL if they default in payment of their principal, interest and other amounts due to the lenders under their respective loan
agreements. Certain of APGL’s project subsidiaries also may not pay dividends to AZI out of restricted cash.
As of March 31, 2017, the Company has fully drawn the commitments for revolving credit facilities for solar power projects.
As of March 31, 2017, the aggregate maturities of long term debt is as follows:
March 31,
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total
Annual maturities
INR
1,622,519
2,225,730
2,048,910
2,733,616
2,503,208
22,433,053
33,567,036
US$
25,020
34,321
31,595
42,153
38,600
345,922
517,611
11. Income Taxes
The individual entities within the Company file individual tax returns as per the regulations existing in their respective jurisdictions.
The fiscal year under the Indian Income Tax Act ends on March 31. A portion of the Company’s Indian operations qualify for deduction from taxable
income because its profits are attributable to undertakings engaged in development of solar power projects under section 80-IA of the Indian Income Tax Act,
1961. This holiday is available for a period of ten consecutive years out of fifteen years beginning from the year in which the Company generates power (“Tax
Holiday Period”), however, the exemption is only available to the projects completed on or before March 31, 2017. The Company anticipates that it will claim the
aforesaid deduction in the last ten years out of fifteen years beginning with the year in which the Company generates power and when it has taxable income.
Accordingly, its current operations are taxable at the normally applicable tax rates.
Due to the Tax Holiday Period, a substantial portion of the temporary differences between the book and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities do
not have any tax consequences as they are expected to reverse within the Tax Holiday Period.
AZI and a subsidiary provide services to other group subsidiaries and incur income taxes on profits from these services. These services are capitalizable by
the subsidiaries and are hence capitalized as part of property, plant and equipment in the standalone financial statements of such subsidiaries and deducted in their
respective income tax return in the form of depreciation expense. However, these capitalized costs are eliminated in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements. AZI treats the income tax it incurs on the provision of such services to its subsidiaries as prepaid income taxes to the extent the amounts are expected to
be deductible by the subsidiaries in their tax returns outside of the Tax Holiday Period.
F-33
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:
Year ended March 31, 2015
Year ended March 31, 2016
Year ended March 31, 2017
US$
Income/(loss) before income taxes is as follows:
Domestic operations
Foreign operations
Total
Current
191,933
28,667
509,083
7,850
Deferred
61,179
299,078
383,250
5,910
Total
253,112
327,745
892,333
13,760
As of March 31,
2015
(INR)
2016
(INR)
(247)
(835,231)
(835,478)
(56,881)
(1,270,214)
(1,327,095)
2017
(INR)
(28,504)
(270,732)
(299,236)
2017
(US$)
(440)
(4,174)
(4,614)
The significant components of the net deferred income tax assets and liabilities exclusive of amounts that would not have any tax consequences because they
will reverse within the Tax Holiday Period, are as follows:
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Other deductible temporary difference
Net operating loss
Gross deferred tax assets
Valuation allowance
Total gross deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation and amortization
Gain on sale of non-controlling interest
Other comprehensive income
Other taxable temporary differences
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax liability
2016
(INR)
As of March 31,
2017
(INR)
2017
(US$)
415
202,505
379,920
582,840
(8,569)
574,271
415
243,950
12,845
257,210
(12,845)
244,365
6
3,763
198
3,967
(198)
3,769
(988,897)
(19,333)
—
(1,428)
(1,009,658)
(435,387)
(1,261,828)
(19,335)
(10,028)
—
(1,291,191)
(1,046,826)
(19,458)
(298)
(154)
—
(19,910)
(16,141)
At March 31, 2016 and 2017, net deferred tax assets were INR 34,661 and INR 31,429 (US$ 485), and net deferred tax liabilities were INR 470,048 and INR
1,078,255 (US$ 16,627), respectively.
At March 31, 2017, the Company performed an analysis of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance for APGL and its Indian and US subsidiaries. Based on
the analysis, the Company has concluded that a valuation allowance offsetting the deferred tax assets is required as of March 31, 2017 on the basis that it is more
likely than not that APGL will not be able to utilize the entirety of its net operating losses as it has no business operations of its own.
F-34
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Change in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 is as follows:
Opening valuation allowance
Movement during the period
Closing valuation allowance
March 31,
2015
(INR)
61,129
(61,092)
37
2016
(INR)
37
8,532
8,569
2017
(INR)
8,569
4,275
12,845
2017
(US$)
132
66
198
The effective income tax rate differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to loss before income taxes as follows:
Statutory income tax benefit
Temporary differences reversing in the Tax Holiday Period
Taxes on intercompany transaction reversing in the Tax Holiday Period
Valuation allowance on net operating losses
Other difference
Year ended 2015
Tax
(283,979)
223,409
321,323
(61,092)
53,451
253,112
%
(33.99%)
26.74%
38.46%
(7.31%)
6.40%
30.30%
Year ended 2016
Tax
(459,308)
428,034
256,143
8,532
94,344
327,745
%
(34.61%)
32.25%
19.30%
0.64%
7.11%
24.70%
Year ended 2017
Tax
(103,494)
223,897
741,474
4,275
26,180
892,333
%
(34.60%)
74.87%
247.96%
1.42%
8.55%
298.20%
The Company had adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 740 as they relate to uncertain income tax positions. Tax exposures can involve complex issues and
may require extended periods to resolve. The Company does not have any uncertain tax positions requiring to be reserved for. The Company reassesses its tax
positions in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit, refinement of an estimate, or changes in tax codes. To the extent that the
final tax outcome of these matters differs from the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the period in which such
determination is made.
As of March 31, 2016, and 2017, deferred income taxes have not been provided for the Company’s share of undistributed net earnings of foreign operations
due to management’s intent to reinvest such amounts indefinitely. Those earnings totaled INR 664,789 INR 1,217,312 and INR 1,315,335 (US$ 20,283) for the
years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
F-35
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
12. Interest expense, net
Interest expense, net consists of the following:
Interest expense:
CCDs
Series E and G CCPS
Term loans
Bank charges and other
Interest income:
Term and fixed deposits
Gain on sale of investments
Investments held-to-maturity
Interest Income related party
Total
13. (Gain)/ loss on foreign currency exchange
(Gain)/ loss on foreign currency exchange consists of the following:
Unrealized loss/ (gain) on foreign currency loans
Realized gain on foreign currency loans
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
Realized loss on derivative instruments
Other gain on foreign currency exchange
14. Equity and preferred shares
Equity shares
2015
(INR)
248,831
96,500
598,845
55,454
999,630
151,860
13,949
—
2,031
167,840
831,790
Year ended March 31,
2016
(INR)
2017
(INR)
408,172
263,654
1,547,382
106,568
2,325,776
90,360
73,840
2,439,052
160,740
2,763,992
221,532
45,375
33
—
266,940
2,058,836
319,823
72,074
259
—
392,156
2,371,836
2017
(US)
1,392
1,139
37,611
2,479
42,621
4,932
1,111
4
—
6,047
36,574
2015
(INR)
Year ended March 31,
2017
2016
(INR)
(INR)
240,656
(42,280)
7,342
93,910
—
299,628
338,297
(80,542)
11,069
74,313
—
343,137
(126,943)
(106,299)
61,862
123,792
(61,540)
(109,128)
2017
(US$)
(1,958)
(1,639)
954
1,909
(949)
(1,683)
Equity shares have a par value of US$0.000625 per share at APGL. There is no limit on the number of equity shares authorized. As of March 31, 2016, and
2017, there were 1,758,080 and 25,915,956 equity shares issued and outstanding.
F-36
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Compulsorily convertible preferred Share
There is no limit of number of preferred shares. The Compulsorily Convertible Preferred Shares (CCPS), treated as mezzanine equity, consisted of the
following:
Series A
Series B
Series C
Series D
Series F
Series H
Series I
* Not in thousands
No of Shares
38,770
181,046
229,880
84,348
138,133
133,285
55,535
860,997
Total consideration
(INR)
92,492
503,994
381,600
474,964
1,550,508
3,840,339
1,666,490
8,510,387
Price per
share
(USD)*
49
61
34
102
184
450
450
In November 2008, AZI had issued 38,770 Series A CCPS for consideration of INR 91,617, (net of INR 875 share issue expenses). In February 2010, AZI
had issued 181,046 Series B CCPS for consideration of INR 500,731 (net of INR 3,263 share issue expenses). In September 2011, AZI had issued 229,880 Series C
CCPS for consideration of INR 377,562 (net of INR 4,038 share issue expenses). In September 2012, AZI had issued 84,348 Series D CCPS for consideration of
INR 474,964 (net of INR NIL share issue expenses). From June 2014 to January 2015 AZI had issued 138,133 series F CCPS for a total consideration of INR
1,549,010 (net of INR 1,498 share issue expenses). Unless converted, the term of the Series A CCPS is a maximum of 19 years from the date of issue, whereas the
terms of the Series B, Series C, Series D and Series F CCPS is a maximum of 20 years, as amended, from the date of issue. On July 25, 2015, the Series A, Series
B, Series C, Series D, and Series F CCPS in AZI were exchanged for similar instruments in APGL having identical terms and conditions.
On July 25, 2015, APGL issued 133,285 Series H CCPS for consideration of INR 3,695,407 (net of INR 144,932 share issuance expenses). Unless
converted, the term of the Series H CCPS is a maximum of 20 years from the date of issue. In September 2016, APGL issued 55,535 Series I CCPS for a
consideration of INR 1,658,166 (net of INR 8,324 share issue expenses) with a term unless converted for 20 years from the date of issue.
The rights, preferences and privileges of the Company’s Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series F, Series H and Series I CCPS (collectively, the
“Mezzanine CCPS”) are as follows:
Voting
The Mezzanine CCPS rank pari passu with regards to voting rights. Holders of Mezzanine CCPS were entitled to vote on all matters and were entitled to the
number of votes equal to the number of equity shares into which the Mezzanine CCPS shares were then convertible on the basis of the applicable conversion factor.
Dividend
Each of the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, and Series F holders of the Mezzanine CCPS were entitled to a 8.0% per annum per share non-cumulative
dividend. Series H and Series I CCPS were entitled to an
F-37
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
8% per annum per share cumulative dividend and thereafter they all participate pro rata on an as converted basis with the equity shareholders on any distributions
made to the equity shareholders. The Company had not declared or paid any dividends through March 31, 2017. The dividend had been accreted as liquidation
preference.
Conversion
Each of the Series A, Series B, Series D, Series F, Series H and Series I CCPS are convertible into equity shares of the Company at the option of the CCPS
holders at any time at a conversion ratio of 1:1. The Series C CCPS were convertible into equity shares of the Company at the option of the CCPS holder at any
time at a conversion ratio of 1:0.3423. Any Mezzanine CCPS which have not been converted into equity shares of the Company were compulsorily converted into
equity shares of the Company, at the aforementioned ratios, upon listing of shares on execution of a QIPO or at their maturity date. Pursuant to the IPO in October
2016, the Company converted all the outstanding CCPS into 14,635,882 equity shares.
Liquidation
On occurrence of a liquidation event, as defined in the terms of the Mezzanine CCPS agreements, the Series A holders were eligible to receive an amount
equal to 140% of the cash paid for the Series A CCPS, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, and the Series B, Series C, and Series D holders had the right to receive
an amount equal to 200% of the cash paid, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, and the Series F holders had the right to receive an amount equal to 150% of the
cash paid, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, and the Series H and Series I CCPS holders had the right to receive an amount equal to 108% of the cash paid, plus
accrued and unpaid dividends. Upon such a liquidation event, the holders of the CCDs and Series E and G CCPS were entitled to receive amounts in preference to
the Series B, Series C, Series D, Series F, Series H and Series I CCPS, who in turn receive amounts in preference to the holders of the Series A CCPS. Series A
CCPS holders received amounts in preference to the Company’s equity shareholders.
Accounting
The Company had evaluated its accounting for the Mezzanine CCPS pursuant to ASC Topic 480 and ASC Topic 815 Derivative and Hedging. The
Mezzanine CCPS did not satisfy the criteria for liability classification described in ASC Topic 480. In addition, the embedded features of the Mezzanine CCPS did
not satisfy the criteria for separate accounting of the derivative from the host instrument pursuant to ASC Topic 815. However, because the Mezzanine CCPS
contain certain redemption features that are not solely within the Company’s control, the Mezzanine CCPS were classified as temporary equity in the consolidated
balance sheets.
The Mezzanine CCPS were being accreted to their buyback value through February 25, 2016, the earliest buyback date, so that the carrying amount equaled
the mandatory redemption value at such date. Subsequently, the Company entered into an arrangement with the Mezzanine CCPS holders to extend the buyback
date to December 31, 2016, without increasing the buyback value.
The Company incurred issuance costs amounting to INR 162,931 (US$2,512) which have been netted against the proceeds received from the issuance of
Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series F, Series H and Series I Mezzanine CCPS. The issuance costs were being accreted over the respective redemption
periods on a straight-line basis. The amount accreted totaled INR 1,899, INR 147,532 and INR 8,324 (US$ 128) during the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and
2017, respectively.
F-38
Table of Contents
15. Earnings per share
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The Company calculates earnings per share in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260 Earnings per Share and FASB ASC Topic 260-10-45 Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. Basic and diluted earnings losses per equity share give effect to
the change in the number of equity shares of the Company. The calculation of basic earnings per equity share is determined by dividing net loss attributable to
APGL equity shareholders by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the respective periods. The potentially dilutive shares, consisting of
employee share options, compulsorily convertible debentures, and compulsorily convertible preferred shares have been included in the computation of diluted net
earnings per share and the weighted average shares outstanding, except where the result would be anti-dilutive.
The Mezzanine CCPS shareholders were entitled to participate, along with the equity shareholders, in the earnings of the Company. Under ASC Topic 260
Earnings
per
Share
, such participative rights would require the two class method of reporting EPS. As the preferred shares do not participate in losses, the
Company had excluded these shares, as including them would be antidilutive.
Loss per share is presented below:
Net loss attributable to APGL equity shareholders
Add: Accretion on Mezzanine CCPS
Add: Accretion on redeemable non-controlling interest
Total (A)
Shares outstanding for allocation of undistributed income:
Equity shares
Weighted average shares outstanding
Equity shares (B)
Net loss per share — basic and diluted
Equity shares (C=A/B)
2015
(INR)
(1,082,995)
(755,207)
—
(1,838,202)
Year ended March 31
2016
(INR)
(1,650,189)
(1,347,923)
(29,825)
(3,027,937)
2017
(INR)
(1,172,645)
(235,853)
(44,073)
(1,452,571)
1,758,080
1,758,080
25,915,956
1,758,080
1,758,080
13,040,618#
(1,046)
(1,722)
(111)
# — The Company had 1,758,080 equity shares outstanding for the period from April 1, 2016 till October 12, 2016 and 25,915,956 equity shares were
outstanding from October 12, 2016 till March 31, 2017.
The number of share options outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per equity share because their effect was antidilutive is
461,136, 414,880, and 540,280 for years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
The CCDs, Series E CCPS and the Series G CCPS have not been considered for the computation of diluted earnings per share because these are considered
to be anti-dilutive.
16. Leases
The Company leases office facilities and land use rights under operating lease agreements. Minimum lease payments under operating leases are recognized
on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. Rent expense for operating leases for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 was INR 44,169,
INR 70,039 and INR 172,528 (US$ 2,660), respectively.
F-39
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases as of March 31, 2017 are:
Year ended March 31,
Fiscal 2018
Fiscal 2019
Fiscal 2020
Fiscal 2021
Fiscal 2022
Thereafter
Total
17. Commitments, guarantees and contingencies
Capital commitments
Amount (INR)
66,652
66,796
64,105
66,262
66,558
2,955,614
3,285,987
US$
1,028
1,030
989
1,022
1,026
45,576
50,671
During the normal course of business, the Company purchases assets for the construction of solar power plants and estimates it will incur INR 3,870,066 (US$
59,677) during the twelve months ended March 31, 2018 in relation to such purchase commitments.
Guarantees
The Company issues irrevocable performance bank guarantees in relation to its obligation to construct solar power plants as required by the PPA. Such
outstanding guarantees amounted to INR 1,189,200 and INR 1,534,700 (US$ 23,665) as of March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The guarantees expire on the
commissioning of the constructed solar power plant.
The Company has obtained guarantees from financial institutions as a part of the bidding process for establishing solar projects amounting to INR 1,192,000
and INR 1,092,000 (US$ 16,839) as of March 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The Company has given term deposits as collateral for those guarantees which are
classified as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet.
The terms of the PPAs provide for the annual delivery of a minimum amount of electricity at fixed prices.
Contingencies
As at March 31, 2017, the Company has received demand for liquidation damages totaling INR 65,000 (US$ 1,002) for projects completed beyond the
contractually agreed dates. The Company has filed an appeal against such demands and has received a stay order from the appellant authorities. The management
believes the reason for delay were not attributable to the Company, based on advice from its legal advisors and the facts underlying the Company’s position, it
believes that the probability that it will ultimately be found liable for these assessments is remote and accordingly has not accrued any amount with respect to these
matters in its consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect the impact of these demands to have a material adverse effect on it financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
18. Related Party Disclosures
For the years ended the year ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017, the Company incurred rent expense on office facilities and guest house facilities totaling
INR 14,490, INR 14,970 and INR 19,362 (US$ 299),
F-40
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
respectively, where the lessors are relatives of the Company’s chief executive officer and another director of APGL. As of March 31, 2016, and 2017, the Company
had security deposits with these lessors totaling INR 8,567 and INR 8,567 (US$ 132).
19. Share based compensation
On July 28, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2015 Stock Option Plan (the “2015 Plan”) allowing for a grant of up to 568,688 options.
During August 2016, the Board approved to increase the employee stock option pool from 568,688 to 1,023,744 shares and the existing Employee Stock Option
Plan 2015 has been discontinued for issuance of new grants and the outstanding stock option pool available for issuance of new grants are transferred to 2016
Equity Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”).
Under the 2015 Plan and 2016 Plan, the Compensation Committee on behalf of Board of Directors (the “Directors”) may from time to time make grants to
one or more employees, determined by it to be eligible for participation in the 2015 and 2016 Plans.
The Compensation Committee determines which employees are eligible to receive the equity awards, the number of equity awards to be granted, the exercise
price, the vesting period and the exercise period. The vesting period will be decided by the Compensation Committee as and when any grant takes place. All
options granted under these plans shall vest over a period of 4 years from the date of grant with 25% vesting at the end of year one, 25% vesting at the end of year
two, 25% vesting at the end of year three and 25% vesting at the end of year four unless specified otherwise.
Options are deemed to have been issued under these plans only to the extent actually issued and delivered pursuant to a grant. To the extent that a grant
lapses or the rights of its grantee terminate, any equity shares subject to such grant are again available for new grants.
The option grant is at such price as may be determined by the Compensation Committee and is specified in the option grant. The grant is in writing and
specifies the number of options granted the price payable for exercising the options, the date/s on which some or all of the options shall be eligible for vesting,
fulfillment of the performance and other conditions, if any, subject to which vesting shall take place and other terms and conditions thereto. The option grant is not
transferable and can be exercised only by the employees of the Company.
Options granted under the plan are exercisable into equity shares of the Company, have a contractual life equal to the shorter of ten years and July 20, 2025,
and vest equitably over four years, unless specified otherwise in the applicable award agreement. The Company recognizes compensation cost, reduced by the
estimated forfeiture rate, over the vesting period of the option. A summary of share option activity during the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2017 is set out
below:
Outstanding as of March 31, 2016
Granted
Exercised
Forfeitures
Options outstanding as of March 31, 2017
Vested and exercisable as of March 31, 2017
Available for grant as of March 31, 2017 is 483,464 options.
* Not in thousands
F-41
Number of shares
414,880
125,400
—
—
540,280
409,328
Weighted average
exercise price in INR *
207
1,496
—
—
506
166
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model includes assumptions regarding dividend yields, expected volatility, expected option term, and risk-free
interest rates. The Company estimates expected volatility based on the historical volatility of comparable publicly traded companies for a period that is equal to the
expected term of the options because it does not have sufficient history of its own volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the treasury bonds issued by the
Indian Government in effect at the time of grant for a period commensurate with the estimated expected life. The expected term of options granted is derived using
the “simplified” method as allowed under the provisions of ASC Topic 718 due to insufficient historical exercise history data to provide a reasonable basis upon
which to estimate expected term.
The fair value of each share option granted to employees is estimated on the date of grant using the Black- Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions:
Dividend yield
Expected term (in years)
Expected volatility
Risk free interest rate
Year ended March 31,
2016
0.00%
5.0 - 6.8
37.2% - 41.6%
7.60% - 8.08%
2017
0.00%
4.5 - 7.2
31.0% - 41.7%
2.15% - 7.61%
On July 28, 2015, the Company issued 414,880 options as replacement for the 414,880 AZI outstanding options under its option plan. In addition to the
replacement of the options, the Company modified certain other terms of the options originally granted by AZI.
In accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation, cancellation of options at AZI and reissue of options at APGL as well as the
modification of certain other terms were considered as a plan modification. In respect of the option modifications, the Company computed the incremental fair
value of the options. The incremental fair value of INR 45,719 (US$ 705) was determined as a difference between the fair value of the modified option and that of
the original option, both estimated at the time of modification. The incremental fair value as per the vesting schedule as on the date of modification that are
recorded amounted to INR 41,334 (US$ 637).
Particulars
Options granted
Equity value (INR)
Dividend yield
Expected term (in years)
Expected volatility
Risk free interest rate
July 25, 2015
Pre-
modification
29,684
7,642
0.00%
0.2-2.8
37.2% - 41.6%
7.60% - 8.08%
Post-
modification
25,930
8,943
0.00%
5.0-6.8
37.2% - 41.6%
7.60% - 8.08%
Outstanding options as of March 31, 2017 include 80,000 options with a market vesting condition. The fair value of these options was determined using the
Lattice valuation model with the following assumptions:
Volatility
Risk- free interest rate
48.1%
8.18%
The result of the Lattice valuation model concludes that the probability of achieving the market conditions to be 5.72% and the fair value of the options has
been fully recorded as expense.
F-42
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
As of March 31, 2016, and 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value of all outstanding options was INR 133,285 and INR 140,864 (US$ 2,172), respectively.
The share based compensation expense related to share options is recorded as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Company’s
consolidated statements of operations and totaled, INR 7,428, INR 51,732 and INR 13,774 (US$ 212) for the years ended March 31, 2015 2016 and 2017,
respectively.
Unrecognized compensation cost for unvested options as of March 31, 2017 is INR 11,385 (US$176), which is expected to be expensed over a weighted
average period of 1.7 years.
The intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended March 31, 2016, and March 31, 2017 was INR 30 and nil (US$ nil).
The intrinsic value per option at the date of grant during the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2017 is as follows:
Date of grant
July 1, 2015
May 4, 2016
August 18, 2016
March 8, 2017
No. of options
granted
Deemed fair value of
equity shares
Intrinsic value per option
at the time of grant
13,808
87,872
22,528
15,000
477
602
337
1,133
476
(1)
336
—
Valuation used
Retrospective
Retrospective
Retrospective
Market price
(1)
Fair value of the shares exceeds the exercise price.
20. Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC Topic 820 Fair
Value
Measurements
and
Disclosures
defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly, hypothetical transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy of fair
value measurement based upon the whether the inputs to that measurement are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect data obtained from
independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. ASC Topic 820 prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation
methodologies in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1 — Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 — Includes other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace. Observable inputs, other than Level 1 quoted prices for similar
instruments in active markets; quoted prices for similar or identical instruments in markets that are not active; and valuations using models in which all significant
inputs are observable in active markets.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value.
F-43
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
In accordance with ASC Topic 820, assets and liabilities are to be measured based on the following valuation techniques:
Market approach — Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
Income approach — converting the future amounts based on the market expectations to its present value using the discounting methodology.
Cost approach — Replacement cost method.
The valuation techniques used by the Company to measure and report the fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities on a recurring basis are as
follows;
Foreign
exchange
derivative
contracts
The Company enters into foreign exchange derivative contracts to hedge fluctuations in foreign exchange rates for recognized balance sheet items such as
foreign exchange term loans. The Company mitigates the credit risk of these foreign exchange derivative contracts by transacting with highly rated counterparties
in India which are major banks. The Company used the super derivatives option pricing model based on the principles of the Black-Scholes model to determine the
fair value of the foreign exchange derivative contracts. The inputs considered in this model include the theoretical value of a call option, the underlying spot
exchange rate as of the balance sheet date, the contracted price of the respective option contract, the term of the option contract, the implied volatility of the
underlying foreign exchange rates and the risk free interest rate as of the balance sheet date. The techniques and models incorporate various inputs including the
credit worthiness of counterparties, foreign exchange spot and forward rates, interest rate yield curves, forward rate yield curves of the underlying. The Company
classifies the fair value of these foreign exchange derivative contracts in Level 2 because the inputs used in the valuation model are observable in active markets
over the term of the respective contracts.
F-44
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Compulsorily
convertible
debentures,
Series
E
and
G
compulsorily
convertible
preferred
shares
The Company classified the fair value of the CCDs, Series E and Series G CCPS in level 3 because the fair values have been derived using valuation
techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable. The Company used a discounted cash flow analysis under the income approach, to determine
the fair value of the CCDs, Series E and Series G CCPs. This valuation model includes various inputs including issue price, liquidation amount, committed internal
rate of return, discount rate and coupon rate.
Description
Assets
Current assets
Foreign exchange derivative contracts
Noncurrent assets
Foreign exchange derivative contracts
Total assets
Liabilities
Current liability
Compulsorily convertible debentures
Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares
Total liabilities
Description
Assets
Current assets
Available for sale securities
Foreign exchange derivative contracts
Noncurrent assets
Foreign exchange derivative contracts
Total assets
Fair Value measurement at reporting date using
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
(INR)
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
(INR)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(INR)
—
—
—
—
—
—
108,606
83,426
192,032
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,132,500
1,468,200
3,600,700
As of
March 31,
2016
(INR)
108,606
83,426
192,032
2,132,500
1,468,200
3,600,700
Fair Value measurement at reporting date using
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
(INR)
As of
March 31,
2017
(INR)
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
(INR)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(INR)
3,296,797
63,818
3,296,797
—
61,120
3,421,735
—
3,296,797
—
63,818
61,120
124,938
—
—
—
—
F-45
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Changes in compulsorily convertible debentures are as follows:
Balance as of March 31, 2014
Issuance of CCDs IFC III
Increase in fair value
Balance as of March 31, 2015
Increase in fair value
Balance as of March 31, 2016
Increase in fair value
Conversion of CCDs into equity share
Balance as of March 31, 2017
Changes in Series E and Series G compulsorily convertible preferred shares are as follows:
Balance as of March 31, 2014
Increase in fair value
Balance as of March 31, 2015
Issuance of Series G CCPS
Increase in fair value
Balance as of March 31, 2016
Increase in fair value
Conversion of CCPS into equity shares
Balance as of March 31, 2017
INR
1,428,800
180,000
189,800
1,798,600
333,900
2,132,500
56,400
(2,188,900)
—
US$
22,032
2,776
2,927
27,735
5,149
32,884
870
(33,754)
—
INR
566,100
96,500
662,600
541,946
263,654
1,468,200
73,841
(1,542,041)
—
US$
8,729
1,488
10,217
8,357
4,066
22,640
1,139
(23,779)
—
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payables, and other current financial assets and
liabilities approximate their fair value largely due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. There have been no transfers between categories during current
year.
The carrying value and fair value of the Company’s fixed rate project financing term loans is as follows:
Fixed rate project financing loans:
Foreign currency loans
Fixed rate project financing loans:
Foreign currency loans
Carrying Value
(INR)
As of March 31,
2016
Fair Value
(INR)
US$
5,995,393
6,241,606
94,213
Carrying Value
(INR)
As of March 31,
2017
Fair Value
(INR)
US$
5,497,166
5,560,038
85,737
F-46
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The Company uses the yield method to estimate the fair value of fixed rate loans using interest rate change as an input. The carrying amount of the
Companies variable rate project financing terms loans approximate, there fair values due to variable interest rates.
The carrying value and fair value of the Company’s investment in Bank of Mauritius notes, classified as held-to-maturity is as follows:
Non-current investments:
Fixed rate Bank of Mauritius notes
Non-current investments:
Fixed rate Bank of Mauritius notes
As of March 31,
2016
Carrying Value
(INR)
Fair Value
(INR)
6,785
7,382
As of March 31,
2017
Carrying Value
(INR)
Fair Value
(INR)
6,631
6,865
US$
111
US$
106
The Company uses the yield method to estimate the fair value of fixed rate Bank of Mauritius notes by using interest rate as an input. The carrying amount of
the Company’s investment in fixed rate Bank of Mauritius notes approximate, their fair values relative to variable interest rates.
21. Derivative instruments and hedging activities
The following table presents outstanding notional amount and balance sheet location information related to foreign exchange derivative contracts as of
March 31, 2016 and 2017:
Foreign currency option contracts
March 31, 2016
Prepaid Expenses
and Other
Current Asset
(INR)
108,606
Notional
Amount
(US$)
14,976
Other
Assets
(INR)
83,426
Notional
Amount
(US$)
12,111
March 31, 2017
Prepaid Expenses
and Other
Current Asset
(INR)
63,818
Other
Assets
(INR)
61,120
The foreign exchange derivative contracts mature generally over a period of 3 to 24 months.
(Gains)/Losses on foreign exchange derivative contracts for the year ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 aggregated INR 101,252, INR 85,382 and INR
185,654 (US$ 2,863), respectively.
22. Concentrations of credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, accounts receivables and derivative instruments. The Company mitigates the risk of credit losses from financing instruments, other than trade
receivables, by selecting counter parties that are well known Indian or international banks.
F-47
Table of Contents
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(INR and US$ amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
The following customers account for more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable and sale of power as of and for the year ended March 31, 2016
and 2017:
Customer Name
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited
Solar Energy Corporation of India
Chhattisgarh State Corporation
23. Subsequent events
March 31, 2016
March 31, 2017
% of Accounts
Receivable
% of Sale
of Power
% of Accounts
Receivable
% of Sale
of Power
11.4%
15.9%
48.5%
12.8%
25.2%
17.0%
29.0%
7.5%
5.6%
39.3%
21.9%
7.7%
15.6%
24.1%
23.4%
7.4%
During April 2017, the Compensation Committee modified stock options granted to two directors. The grants were modified to increase the number of
options granted and to reduce the exercise price.
The Company commenced commercial operations of its 100MW solar power plant located in Andhra Pradesh, subsequent to March 31, 2017.
The Company evaluated all other events or transactions that occurred after March 31, 2017. Based on this evaluation, the Company is not aware of any event
or transactions that would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.
F-48
AMENDED AND RESTATED SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT
Exhibit 4.26
DATED: 28 TH MARCH, 2017
BY AND AMONGST
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED
AND
AZURE POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
AND
MR. INDERPREET SINGH WADHWA
AND
MR. HARKANWAL SINGH WADHWA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
1.
EFFECTIVENESS AND SHARE CAPITAL OF THE COMPANY
2.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
3.
NOT USED
4.
NOT USED
5.
TRANSFER OF SHARES
6.
NOT USED
7.
REINSTATEMENT OF RIGHTS
8.
NOT USED
9.
NOT USED
10.
MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY
11.
NOT USED
12.
EXERCISE OF VOTING & OTHER RIGHTS BY PARTIES
13.
NOT USED
14.
NOT USED
15.
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING AND AUDITS
16.
OTHER COVENANTS
17.
NON-COMPETE AND NON-SOLICITATION
18.
NOT USED
19.
NOT USED
20.
TERMINATION
21.
CONFIDENTIALITY
22.
GOVERNING LAW AND ARBITRATION
23.
NOTICES
24.
25.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
SCHEDULE A – DEED OF ADHERENCE
i
3
8
9
9
10
10
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
16
16
17
17
17
18
19
19
20
26
This AMENDED AND RESTATED SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT is made on this , 2017;
AMENDED AND RESTATED SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT
BY AND AMONG
1.
2.
3.
AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED , a company, organized and existing under the laws of Mauritius (“ APGL ”), and having its registered office at
c/o AAA Global Services Ltd, 1st Floor, The Exchange, 18 Cybercity, Ebene, Mauritius (hereinafter referred to as “ APGL ” which expression shall mean
and include the said company, its executors, assigns and successors – in-interest), of the First Part;
AZURE POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED , a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered
office at 8, LSC, Madangir, Pushpvihar, New Delhi-110062, India (hereinafter referred to as the “ Company ” which expression shall mean and include the
said company, its executors, assigns and successors- in-interest), of the Second Part;
AND
MR. INDERPREET SINGH WADHWA , son of Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa residing at J-57, Third Floor, Saket, New Delhi 110 017, and MR.
HARKANWAL SINGH WADHWA , son of Late Mr. Manohar Singh Wadhwa, residing at C-2324 Ranjit Ave, Amritsar, Punjab (hereinafter collectively
referred to as “ Sponsors ”, which expression shall mean and include their successors, legal heirs and permitted assigns), of the Third Part;
AND
(APGL, the Company and the Sponsors are individually referred as to “ Party ” and collectively referred to as the “ Parties ”).
WHEREAS
(A)
The Company has been incorporated with the object of generation and production of solar energy and electricity and erection of solar power plants.
(B)
The APGL had subscribed to the Equity Securities of the Company and executed the Shareholders Agreement dated December 30, 2016 (“ Existing SHA
”) to govern its rights and obligations as the shareholder of the Company.
(C)
Thereafter, all the convertable securities issued by the Company to APGL were converted into Equity Shares with effect from 28.03.2017.
(D)
Pursuant to the above, Parties are entering into this shareholders’ agreement to incorporate rights and obligations of APGL, the Sponsors and the Company
for regulating the management and control of the affairs of the Company and certain other rights and obligations inter
se
in accordance with the terms and
conditions set out herein.
2
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH AS UNDER:
1.
1.1
DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
In this Agreement the following terms, to the extent not inconsistent with the context, shall have the meanings assigned to them herein below:
“ Accounts ” shall mean the books of account of the Company and also includes its balance sheet, profit and loss account and all other records, ledgers,
accounting notations and pertinent documentation.
“ Act/ Companies Act ” shall mean the Companies Act, 1956, as amended, modified or re-enacted by the Companies Act, 2013 and any other
enactments from time to time including any rules or regulations framed thereunder.
“ Affiliate ” in relation to a Person,
(i)
(ii)
being a corporate entity, shall mean any entity or Person, which Controls, is Controlled by, or is under the common Control of such Person;
being an individual, shall mean any Relative or any other entity or Person, which is Controlled by such Person or a Relative of such individual;
and
(iii)
in any other case shall mean a Person Controlled by a Party/ies to this Agreement;
“ Agreement ” or “ SHA ” means this Shareholders Agreement and includes all recitals, schedules, annexes and exhibits that are annexed to it, and any
amendments made to it by the Parties in writing.
“ Authority ” means any national, supranational, regional or local government, or governmental, statutory, regulatory, administrative, fiscal, judicial, or
government-owned body, department, commission, authority, tribunal, agency or entity, or central bank (or any Person whether or not government owned
and howsoever constituted or called, that exercises the functions of the central bank).
“ Articles ” shall mean the articles of association of the Company, as may be amended from time to time.
“ Assets ” shall mean assets or properties of every kind, nature, character and description (whether immovable, movable, tangible, intangible, absolute,
accrued, fixed or otherwise) as operated, hired, rented, owned or leased by a Person from time to time, including cash, cash equivalents, receivables,
securities, accounts and note receivables, real estate, plant and machinery, equipment, patents, copyrights, domain names, trademarks, brands, rights in
databases and other intellectual property, raw materials, inventory, furniture, fixtures and insurance.
3
“ Big Four Accounting Firms ” means the following accounting firms or their Affiliates: Deloitte Touche; PricewaterhouseCoopers; Ernst & Young;
and KPMG.
“ Board ” shall mean the board of directors of the Company.
“ Buy Back Notice ” shall have the meaning as assigned to it under Clause 6.8.2.
“ Buy Back Option ” shall have the meaning as assigned to it under Clause 6.8.1.
“ Buy Back Start Date ” shall have the meaning assigned to it under Clause 6.8.2.
“ Business ” shall mean and include the activities that the Company has been authorized to carry out under the “Main Objects” clause of its
Memorandum.
“ Business Day ” means a day (other than a Saturday or Sunday or an official public holiday) on which commercial banks are open for business in New
Delhi, Mauritius and New York.
“ CEO ” shall mean the position of the chief executive officer and managing director of the Company.
“ Control ” (including with correlative meaning, the terms “ Controlled by ” and “ under common Control with ”) means the power to direct the
management or policies of a Person, directly or indirectly, whether through the ownership of shares or Share Equivalents, by contract or otherwise;
provided that, in any event, the direct or indirect ownership of more than 50% (fifty per cent) of the voting share capital of a Person is deemed to
constitute Control of that Person.
“ Corrupt Practice ” means the following acts:
(i)
(ii)
the promise, offering or giving, directly or indirectly, to a Public Official or to any person who directs or works, in any capacity, for a private
sector entity, of an undue advantage of any nature, for the relevant person himself or herself or for another person or entity, in order that this
person acts or refrains from acting in the exercise of his or her official duties or in breach of his or her legal, contractual or professional
obligations having for effect to influence his or her own actions or the ones of another party or entity;
the solicitation or acceptance, directly or indirectly, by a Public Official or by any person who directs or works, in any capacity, for a private
sector entity, of an undue advantage of any nature, for the relevant person himself or herself or for another person or entity, in order that this
person acts or refrains from acting in the exercise of his or her official duties or in breach of his or her legal, contractual or professional
obligations having for effect to influence his or her own actions or the ones of another party or entity.
“ Debt ” shall mean at any time the aggregate of the following:
(i)
the outstanding principal amount or the nominal amount of any debenture, bond, note, loan stock or other similar security of the Company under
which any indebtedness is incurred; and
4
(ii)
any fixed or minimum premium payable on the repayment or redemption or conversion of any instrument.
“ Deed of Adherence ” means a deed of adherence to this Agreement substantially in the form set forth in Schedule A , with applicable amendments
which are in form and substance satisfactory to each of the Parties to this Agreement.
“ Director ” shall mean a director duly appointed on the Board.
“ Effective Date ” shall have the meaning as set forth in Clause 2.1.
“ Embargo ” means any economic sanction aiming at prohibiting the import and/or export (sale, supply, transfer) of one specific or several goods,
products or services to or from a country for a specified period as published and amended from time to time by the United Nations, European Union and
France.
“ Encumbrance ” means any mortgage, charge (fixed or floating), pledge, lien, hypothecation, trust, right of set off or other third party right or interest
(legal or equitable) including any right of pre-emption, assignment by way of security, reservation of title or any other security interest of any kind
however created or arising or any other agreement or arrangement (including a sale and repurchase arrangement) having similar effect.
“ Employees ” shall mean individuals who are the confirmed/ permanent employees of the Company.
“ Equity Securities ” shall mean Equity Shares and Share Equivalents.
“ Equity Shares ” or “ Shares ” shall mean equity shares of the Company having the face value of INR 10 (Indian Rupees Ten) each and carrying 1 (one)
vote per equity share.
“ Financial Year ” shall mean the financial year of the Company as determined by the Board.
“ Fraudulent Practice ” refers to any unfair practices (action or omission) intended to deliberately mislead a third party, intentionally conceal elements
there from, or betray or vitiate his/her consent, contravening legal or regulatory obligations and/or breaching the Company’s or a third party’s internal
rules for the purpose of obtaining an illegitimate benefit.
“ Fully Diluted Basis ” means the number of Equity Shares of the Company, calculated as if the then issued and outstanding relevant Share Equivalents
(including CCDs and Proparco CCPS) had been exercised and converted in full. For the purpose of this definition, CCDs and Proparco CCPS shall be
assumed to be converted in accordance with their respective terms, and in case their respective terms do not specify the manner of valuation of the
Company for the provisions of this Agreement for which the ‘Fully Diluted Basis’ is being ascertained, then the Company shall on a written request of
any of
5
the holders of CCDs or Proparco CCPS cause the valuation of the Company to be conducted by any one of the Big Four Accounting Firms and inform the
valuation to such holder, which valuation shall be used to determine the conversion of CCDs and/or Proparco CCPS.
“ Illicit Origin ” means funds obtained through: (i) the commission of any predicate offence as designated in the FATF 40 Recommendations Glossary
(http://www.fatf-gafi.org/pages/glossary/fatfrecommendations/d-i/), (ii) Corrupt Practice, and (iii) if or when applicable, through Fraud against the
Financial Interests of the European Communities.
“ INR ” or “ Indian Rupees ” shall mean the lawful Indian currency.
“ Key Managerial Personnel ” shall mean the CEO, all Employees directly reporting to the CEO, and such other persons as both the Sponsors and
APGL may agree to designate as such from time to time.
“ Law ” includes all applicable statutes, enactments, acts of legislature or Parliament, laws, ordinances, rules, bye-laws, regulations, notifications,
guidelines, policies, directions, directives and orders of any Authority, tribunal, board, court or recognized stock exchange in force in India.
“ Listing Date ” shall mean 12 th October 2016.
“ Memorandum ” shall mean the memorandum of association of the Company.
“ Party ” or “ Parties ” shall mean any of the Sponsors, Company and APGL referred to individually or collectively, as the context so requires.
“ Person ” shall mean and include an individual, an association, a corporation, a partnership, a joint venture, a venture capital fund, a trust, an
unincorporated organization, a joint stock company or other entity or organization, including a government or political subdivision, or an agency or
instrumentality thereof and/or any other legal entity.
“ Public Official ” means (i) any holder of legislative, executive, administrative or judicial office appointed or elected, serving on a permanent basis or
otherwise, paid or unpaid, regardless of rank; (ii) any other person exercising a public function, including for a public agency or company, or providing a
public service; and (iii) any other person defined as a public official under the domestic law of the Company’s country.
“ Relative ” shall have the meaning ascribed to it under the Act.
“ Relevant Parties ” shall mean the Company, the Sponsors and each of the other Shareholders (other than APGL) that agree to become a party to this
Agreement pursuant to a Deed of Adherence.
“ Share Equivalents ” means preference shares, bonds, debenture, loans, warrants, options or other similar instruments or securities which are
convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for, or which carry a right to subscribe for or purchase, Equity Shares of
6
the Company or any instrument or certificate representing a beneficial ownership interest in the Equity Shares of the Company, including global
depositary receipts or American depositary receipts and an instrument representing a Debt.
“ Shareholder ” or “ Shareholders ” shall mean any Person who holds Equity Securities.
“ Shareholder Securities ” shall mean the Equity Securities held by the Shareholders.
“ Sponsor Buy-Back Period ” shall have the meaning as assigned to it under Clause 6.8.3.
“ Sponsor Securities ” shall have all of the Equity Shares held by the Sponsors in the Company.
“ Third Party Interest ” shall mean any security interest, lease, license, option, voting arrangement, easement, covenant, notation, restriction, interest
under any agreement, interest under any trust, or other right, equity, entitlement or other interest of any nature held by a third party.
“ Transaction Documents ” means:
(i)
(ii)
this Agreement; and
any other documents that may be entered into by the parties therein for the purpose of executing the transactions contemplated in the
Transaction Documents.
“ Transfer ” means to transfer, sell, convey, assign, pledge, hypothecate, create a security interest in or Encumbrance on, place in trust (voting or
otherwise), transfer by operation of law or in any other way subject to any encumbrance or dispose of, whether or not voluntarily, and shall include
reference to any action, which has the effect of creating any Third Party Interest in or over the Equity Securities. “ Transferable ” and “ Transferred ”
shall have corresponding meanings.
1.2
1.3
Certain terms may be defined elsewhere in this Agreement and wherever, such terms are so defined, they shall have the meaning assigned to them. The
terms referred to but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meaning as defined in the Transaction Documents and failing this shall, unless
inconsistent with the context or meaning thereof, bear the same meaning as defined under the Act or other relevant applicable Law.
All references in this Agreement to statutory provisions shall be construed as meaning and including references to any statutory modification, consolidation
or re-enactment (whether before or after the date of this Agreement) for the time being in force, and all statutory instruments or orders made pursuant to
such statutory provisions.
1.4
Words denoting singular shall include the plural and words denoting any gender shall include all genders unless the context otherwise requires.
1.5
References to recitals, clauses or schedules are, unless the context otherwise requires, references to recitals or schedules to, or clauses of this Agreement.
7
1.6
Any reference to “writing” shall mean handwritten, printed, typed or electronic mail to reproduce words in permanent visible and legible form.
1.7
The terms “include” and “including” shall mean “include without limitation”.
1.8
The headings, subheadings, titles, subtitles to clauses, sub-clauses and paragraphs are for information only, shall not form part of the operative provisions
of this Agreement or the schedules, and shall be ignored in construing the same.
1.9
Any reference to a decision of the Board shall, in the absence of an express statement to the contrary, refer to a simple majority decision of the Board.
1.10
If a period of time and dates from a given day or the day of an act or event is specified, it is to be calculated exclusive of that day.
1.11 Where the consent or approval of a Party to this Agreement is required hereunder to any act, deed, matter or thing, such requirement shall in the absence of
any express stipulation to the contrary herein, mean the prior consent or approval (as the case may be) in writing.
1.12
The words “directly or indirectly” mean directly or indirectly through one or more intermediary persons or through contractual or other legal arrangements,
and “direct or indirect” shall have the correlative meanings.
2.
2.1
2.2
EFFECTIVENESS AND SHARE CAPITAL OF THE COMPANY
This Agreement shall be effective and binding on the Parties on and from 28 th March, 2017 (“ Effective Date ”). On the Effective Date and henceforth,
the terms of this Agreement shall supersede the provisions of the Existing SHA.
The present authorized share capital of the Company is INR 130,00,00,000 divided into 4,33,33,333 Equity Shares and 8,66,66,667 preference shares. The
Equity Securities issued and allotted by the Company as on the date of this Agreement are as indicated in the table below:
S. No.
Name of Equity Share Holder
1 Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
2 Mr. Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa
3 Mr. Nirav Rawal
4
Azure Power Global Limited
Total
8
No. of Equity
Shares
97,497
5,000
90
27,05,069
28,07,656
Percentage
holding
3.473
0.178
0.003
96.346
100.00
3.
3.1
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The Sponsors hereby represent and warrant that:
(a)
(b)
(c)
They have the power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and are not prohibited from entering into this Agreement;
This Agreement, upon execution and delivery by the Sponsors, will be a legal, valid and binding obligation of each of them enforceable in
accordance with its terms; and
The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Sponsors and the promises, agreements or undertakings of the Sponsors under this Agreement
do not violate any Law, rule, regulation or order applicable to them or violate or contravene the provisions of or constitute a default under any
documents, contracts, agreements or any other instruments which the Sponsors have executed or which are applicable to them.
3.2
The Company hereby represents and warrants that:
(a)
(b)
(c)
It has the power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and is not prohibited from entering into this Agreement;
This Agreement has been duly authorized by the Board and the Shareholders of the Company and upon execution and delivery by the Company,
will be a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company enforceable in accordance with its terms; and
The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company, and the promises, agreements or undertakings of the Company under this
Agreement do not violate any Law, rule, regulation or order applicable to it or violate or contravene the provisions of or constitute a default under
any documents, contracts, agreements or any other instruments to which it is a party or which are applicable to it.
3.3
APGL hereby represents and warrants that:
(a)
(b)
(c)
It has the power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and is not prohibited from entering into this Agreement;
This Agreement has been duly authorized by it, and upon such execution and delivery, will be a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable in
accordance with its terms; and
The execution and delivery of this Agreement by it and the promises, agreements or undertakings of it under this Agreement does not violate any
Law, rule, regulation or order applicable to them or violate or contravene the provisions of or constitute a default under any documents, contracts,
agreements or any other instruments which it has executed or which are applicable to it.
4.
Not Used
9
5.
6.
Not Used
TRANSFER OF SHARES
6.1
Restrictions on Transfer
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.1.3
6.1.4
Subject to compliance with this Clause 6.1 ( Restrictions
on
Transfer
), the Equity Securities (or any part thereof) held by APGL shall be
freely transferable at all times and to any Person without the prior consent of any other Person, including the Company and the Sponsors. It is
clarified that no such transfer by APGL to any Person shall be effective unless the transferee of such shares executes a Deed of Adherence as
set out in Schedule A of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement, the Shareholders of the Company shall not Transfer any of the Equity Shares held by
them to any Person (i) who is named on (a) lists promulgated by the United Nations Security Council or its committees pursuant to resolutions
issued under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter; or (b) the World Bank Listing of Ineligible Firms (see www.worldbank.org/debarr);
or (c) Financial Sanctions List; or (d) the Specially Designated Nationals List administered by OFAC, or (ii) who do not comply with the
FATF Recommendations against money laundering and the terrorism financing, or (iii) who has been found by a judicial or administrative
process or who or which is under any administrative, supervisory or criminal inquiry to have committed or engaged in any act given rise to
Corrupt Practices, Fraudulent Practices, Anti-Competitive Practices, money laundering or terrorism financing, or (iv) who finances, buys or
provides, materials or sectors subject to United Nations, European Union or French Embargo and/or is engaged in any sectors under United
Nations, European Union or French Embargo or (v) whose equity, quasi equity and or shareholders loans’ accounts or associates current
accounts are of Illicit Origin; or (vi) who is the target of any economic sanctions administered by OFAC.
Any Transfer of Equity Securities attempted in violation of this Clause 6 ( Transfer
of
Shares
) shall be null and void, and shall not be binding
upon the Company or the Board and the Company shall not, and each of the Parties shall exercise all rights and powers available to it to
procure that the Company shall not, reflect on its books any Transfer of Equity Securities to any Person except a Transfer made in accordance
with this Clause 6.
The Company shall record in its share registry the restrictions on the Transfer of the Equity Securities of the Company set forth in this Clause
6, and note such restrictions on the Transfer of the Equity Securities of the Company on the certificate(s) for Equity Securities issued by the
Company.
6.2
Transfer by Sponsors
6.2.1
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement, the Sponsors, for a period of two years from the Listing date, shall not directly or
indirectly Transfer any
10
Equity Shares held by them in any manner whatsoever to any Person (including to their Affiliates or other Sponsors) or create any
Encumbrance with respect to any of the Equity Shares held by them (including pledge or creating any charge on the Equity Shares for any
reason whatsoever) without the prior written consent of APGL.
6.2.2
Subject to Clause 6.2.1 above, the Sponsors may transfer the Equity Shares held by them to any Person only in accordance with Clause 6.8 (
Buy
Back
of
Sponsor
Securities
) Clause 6.9 ( APGL’s
Call
Option
) and Clause 6.10 ( Sponsors’
Put
Option
). It is clarified that the Sponsors
shall not Transfer any Equity Shares they hold in the Company other than pursuant to Clause 6.8 ( Buy
Back
of
Sponsor
Securities
) Clause 6.9
( APGL’s
Call
Option
) and Clause 6.10 ( Sponsors’
Put
Option
).
6.3
Transfer by the Investors
6.3.1
Not used
6.3.2
Not used
6.3.3
Co-Sale Rights
[DELETED]
6.3.4
Transfer to Competitor
[DELETED]
6.4
Drag Right of the Investors
[DELETED]
6.5
Drag Right of IFC, DEG and Proparco
[DELETED]
6.6
IFC, DEG and Proparco Call Option
[DELETED]
11
6.7
Sponsors, Helion and FC Call Option
[DELETED]
6.8
Buy Back of Sponsor Securities
6.8.1
6.8.2
6.8.3
Subject to the provisions of the Act, APGL shall have the right, exercisable at its sole discretion, to require the Company to buy back all of the
Sponsor Securities in accordance with this Clause 6.8 (the “ Buy Back Option ”).
Upon APGL notifying the Company in writing (the “ Buy Back Notice ”) of its decision to exercise the Buy Back Option, the Company shall
initiate the process of buy back of the Sponsor Securities within a period of 15 (fifteen) Business Days of the receipt of the Buy Back Notice
by the Company (“ Buy Back Start Date ”).
The Company shall be obligated to buy back all of the Sponsor Securities in accordance with applicable Law within the Sponsor Buy-Back
Period (as defined below), and if the Company is not permitted to buy back all of the Sponsor Securities under applicable Law within such
Sponsor Buy-Back Period, then the Company shall buy back in every subsequent Financial Year such number of Sponsor Securities which are
permissible to be bought back to the maximum extent till all Sponsor Securities have been bought back by the Company.
“ Sponsor Buy-Back Period ” shall mean a period of 60 (sixty) days from the date of the Buy Back Start Date, and for buy back under any
subsequent Financial Years, a period of 60 (sixty) days starting from August 1 of such Financial Year.
The Sponsors agree that the price for the buyback shall be the minimum price permissible under applicable Law for the buyback of Equity
Shares by the Company from the Sponsors. The Sponsors hereby expressly waive all their rights available under Law in connection with being
a minority shareholders of the Company. The Sponsors acknowledge that it is the intention of all Parties to eventually make the Company a
wholly owned subsidiary of APGL, and the Sponsors shall not raise any claims or objections to resist the buyback of the Sponsor Securities by
the Company.
6.9
APGL’s Call Option
6.9.1
APGL shall have the right exercisable at its sole discretion to require the Sponsors to sell to APGL or its nominee all or part of the Sponsor
Securities (“ Call Option ”) in accordance with this Clause 6.9. It is clarified that APGL shall have the right to purchase the Sponsor
Securities pursuant to the Call Option either by itself or nominate any other Person to purchase such Sponsor Securities (“ Call Purchaser ”).
6.9.2
APGL shall exercise the Call Option by delivering a written notice (“ Call Option
12
Notice ”) to the Sponsors of its intention to exercise the Call Option. The Call Option Notice shall set out the number of Equity Shares to be
sold by each Sponsor, the sale price for each such Equity Share (“ Call Option Price ”) and the date (“ Call Settlement Date ”) on which the
Sponsors shall sell the Sponsor Securities to the Call Purchaser. The price for the sale of Sponsor Securities to the Call Purchaser shall be the
minimum price permissible under applicable Law for such sale. For the purpose of valuation of the Sponsor Securities, the Company shall
appoint a certified chartered accountant or a category 1 merchant banker as identified by APGL, whose valuation report shall be filed along
with the required filings with the Reserve Bank of India, if applicable.
The issuance of the Call Option Notice shall constitute a valid and binding agreement between the APGL and the Sponsors for the purchase by
the Call Purchaser of all of the Sponsor Securities. The Sponsors hereby irrevocably agree to transfer the Sponsor Securities at the Call Option
Price as indicated in the Call Option Notice. On the Call Settlement Date, the Sponsors shall sell the Sponsor Securities to the Call Purchaser
by delivery of the share certificates representing such Sponsor Securities (free and clear from all Encumbrances), together with duly endorsed
forms of transfer in respect of such Sponsor Securities to the Call Purchaser; and the Call Purchaser shall pay in full the applicable Call Option
Price as mentioned in the Call Option Notice to the Sponsors.
The Company and the Shareholders undertake to provide all necessary assistance in obtaining and/or making all the required filings,
certifications, consents and approvals for consummation of the Call Option.
Upon completion of the sale of the Sponsor Securities, the Sponsors shall relinquish, and shall no longer be entitled to any dividends, profits,
retained earnings of the Company or similar rights that attach to the Sponsor Securities so transferred to the Call Purchaser pursuant to the Call
Option.
6.9.3
6.9.4
6.9.5
6.10
Sponsor’s Put Option
6.10.1
6.10.2
After the completion of initial public offering of APGL, the Sponsors shall have the right to request APGL or its nominee to purchase all or
part of the Sponsor Securities (“ Purchase Option ”) in accordance with this Clause 6.10. APGL shall have the right (not an obligation) to
purchase the Sponsor Securities pursuant to the Purchase Option exercised by the Sponsors, which purchase can be made by APGL either by
itself or nominate any other Person to purchase such Sponsor Securities (“ Option Purchaser ”).
Sponsors shall exercise the Purchase Option by delivering a written notice (“ Option Notice ”) to APGL intimating APGL of their intention to
exercise the Purchase Option. The Option Notice shall set out the number of Equity Shares to be sold by each Sponsor, the sale price for each
such Equity Share (“ Option Price ”) and the date (“ Settlement Date ”) on which the Sponsors shall sell the Sponsor Securities to the Option
Purchaser, which date shall not be earlier than 6 (months) from the date of receipt of the Option Notice by APGL. The price for the sale of
Sponsor Securities to the Option Purchaser shall be the minimum price
13
permissible under applicable Law for such sale. For the purpose of valuation of the Sponsor Securities, the Company shall appoint a certified
chartered accountant or a category 1 merchant banker as identified by Sponsors and approved by APGL, whose valuation report shall be filed
along with the required filings with the Reserve Bank of India, if applicable.
If APGL intends to purchase the Sponsor Securities in accordance with the terms as set out in the Option Notice, it shall issue a written notice
(“ Acceptance Notice ”) to the Sponsors confirming the terms of the Option Notice. The issuance of the Acceptance Notice shall constitute a
valid and binding agreement between the APGL and the Sponsors for the purchase by the Option Purchaser of all of the Sponsor Securities so
offered by the Sponsors. The Sponsors hereby irrevocably agree to transfer the Sponsor Securities at the Option Price as indicated in the
Option Notice, subject to the issuance of Acceptance Notice by APGL. On the Settlement Date, the Sponsors shall sell the Sponsor Securities
to the Option Purchaser by delivery of the share certificates representing such Sponsor Securities (free and clear from all Encumbrances other
than Encumbrances as contained in the Articles), together with duly endorsed forms of transfer in respect of such Sponsor Securities to the
Option Purchaser; and the Option Purchaser shall pay in full the applicable Option Price as mentioned in the Option Notice to the Sponsors.
The Company and the Shareholders undertake to provide all necessary assistance in obtaining and/ or making all the required filings,
certifications, consents and approvals for consummation of the Purchase Option, subject to the delivery of Acceptance Notice by APGL.
Upon completion of the sale of the Sponsor Securities, the Sponsors shall relinquish, and shall no longer be entitled to any dividends, profits,
retained earnings of the Company or similar rights that attach to the Sponsor Securities so transferred to the Option Purchaser pursuant to the
Purchase Option.
6.10.3
6.10.4
6.10.5
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
NOT USED
REINSTATEMENT OF RIGHTS
[DELETED]
NOT USED
NOT USED
MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY
The Parties to this Agreement agree to be bound by the provisions of the existing articles of association of the Company in relation to the management and
day-to-day operations of the Company including but not limited to the meeting of the board of directors of the Company, shareholders of the Company etc.
14
12.
13.
13.1
13.2
13.3
14.
15.
16.
NOT USED
EXERCISE OF VOTING & OTHER RIGHTS BY PARTIES
The Sponsors shall exercise the voting rights on the Sponsor Securities on the instructions and directions of APGL. If required by APGL, the Sponsors
shall execute all documents and undertake all actions and deeds to give effect to the instructions and directions of APGL in this regard, including power of
attorneys and/or proxies in favour of the person nominated by APGL, who shall act on the instructions and directions of APGL. In case no instructions or
directions are provided by APGL, the Sponsors shall vote for its Sponsor Securities in the manner consistent and in agreement with the voting by APGL on
its Equity Shares in the Company.
Subject to the above, the Sponsors undertake to ensure that they shall at all times exercise their votes and through their respective appointed/ nominated
Directors (or alternate directors) at Board meetings and otherwise, act in such manner so as to comply with, and to fully and effectually implement the
spirit, intent and specific provisions of this Agreement.
The Sponsors hereby expressly waive all their rights available under Law in connection with being a minority shareholders of the Company, and agrees to
comply with the decisions made at the shareholders meeting and the Board of the Company.
If a resolution contrary to the terms of this Agreement is proposed at any meeting of Shareholders or at any meeting of the Board or any committee thereof,
APGL and the Sponsors, their representatives (including proxies) and their respective nominated Directors (or alternate directors), shall vote against the
same; provided, however, that if for any reason such a resolution is passed, the Shareholders shall, as necessary jointly convene or cause to be convened a
meeting of the Board or any committee thereof or an extraordinary general meeting of the Shareholders for the purpose of implementing the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and to give effect thereto, and to supersede such resolution.
Not Used
Not Used
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING AND AUDITS
16.1
Financial and accounting records
The Company shall maintain true and accurate financial and accounting records of all operations in accordance with Indian GAAP, and in accordance with
all relevant Indian statutory and accounting standards and the policies from time to time adopted by the Board. The financial statements and Accounts of
the Company shall be prepared in English and shall be audited on an annual basis.
15
16.2
Statutory Auditors
The Company in a general meeting shall appoint a reputed chartered accountancy firm registered in India that is recommended by APGL as the statutory
auditors for the Company.
17.
OTHER COVENANTS
17.1
NOT USED
17.2 Other Covenants
17.2.1
The Company covenants to ensure the development, implementation and continuing operation of the S&E Management System.
17.2.2
Through its Employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors, the Company covenants to, ensure that the design, construction, operation,
maintenance and monitoring of all its sites, plants, equipment and facilities are undertaken in compliance with: (i) the Performance Standards
System; and (ii) the S&EA System.
17.3
NOT USED
17.4
NOT USED
18.
NON-COMPETE AND NON-SOLICITATION
18.1
The Sponsors hereby undertake that they shall not, and shall ensure that none of their Subsidiaries or Affiliates shall, singly or jointly, directly or indirectly,
for their own account or as agent, employee, officer, director, consultant, or shareholder or equity owner of any other Person, engage or attempt to engage
or assist any other Person to engage in the Business. The Sponsors further undertake that from the date of this Agreement, they shall give up, part with
and/or cease and desist from carrying on in India any activity or business which is same as that of the Business of the Company. They undertake that any
venture or investment, whether directly or indirectly, in the Business shall only be undertaken, carried on, implemented, or held through the Company or its
Subsidiaries, unless APGL gives prior written consent to the Sponsors to do otherwise.
18.2
The Sponsors shall also not divulge or disclose to any Person any information (other than information available to the public or disclosed or divulged
pursuant to an order of a court of competent jurisdiction) relating to the Business, including but not limited to the identity of clients, finance, contractual
arrangements, business or methods.
18.3
The Sponsors covenant and agree that during the subsistence of this Agreement, they will not, directly or indirectly:
(a)
attempt in any manner to solicit from any client/customer, except on behalf of the Company, business of the type carried on by the Company or to
persuade any Person which is a client/customer of the Company to cease doing business or to reduce the amount of business which any such
client/customer has customarily
16
done or might propose doing with the Company whether or not the relationship between the Company and such client/customer was originally
established in whole or in part through his or its efforts; or
(b)
(c)
employ or attempt to employ or assist anyone else to employ any Person as an employee or a consultant (including the Key Managerial Personnel
and the CEO) who is in the employment of the Company, or was in the employment of the Company at any time during the preceding 12 (twelve)
months; or
otherwise interfere in any manner with the contractual, employment or other relationship of any Person (including the Key Managerial Personnel
and the CEO) who is in the employment of the Company, or was in the employment of the Company at any time during the preceding 12 (twelve)
months.
The Sponsors acknowledge and agree that the above restrictions are considered reasonable for the legitimate protection of the business and the goodwill of
APGL and the Company, but in the event that such restriction shall be found to be void, but would be valid if some part thereof was deleted or the scope,
period or area of application were reduced, the above restriction shall apply with the deletion of such words or such reduction of scope, period or area of
application as may be required to make the restrictions contained in this Clause valid and effective. Notwithstanding the limitation of this provision by any
Law for the time being in force, the Sponsors undertake to, at all times, observe and be bound by the spirit of this Clause 18.
Provided however, that on the revocation, removal or diminution of the Law or provisions, as the case may be, by virtue of which the restrictions contained
in this Clause were limited as provided hereinabove, the original restrictions would stand renewed and be effective to their original extent, as if they had not
been limited by the Law or provisions revoked.
The Sponsors acknowledge and agree that the covenants and obligations with respect to non-compete and non-solicitation as set forth above relate to
special, unique and extraordinary matters, and that a violation of any of the terms of such covenants and obligations will cause APGL and the Company
irreparable injury. Therefore, the Sponsors agree that APGL and/ or the Company shall be entitled to an interim injunction, restraining order or such other
equitable relief as a court of competent jurisdiction may deem necessary or appropriate to restrain the Sponsors from committing any violation of the
covenants and obligations contained in this Clause 18. These injunctive remedies are cumulative and are in addition to any other rights and remedies,
APGL and/or the Company may have at Law or in equity.
NOT USED
NOT USED
TERMINATION
Subject to other provisions of this Agreement, this Agreement and all corresponding rights of a Shareholder hereunder shall terminate, without any further
action on the part of the Parties, to the extent and in the manner specified below:
17
18.4
18.5
18.6
19.
20.
21.
21.1
(a)
(b)
the obligations of the Sponsors under this Agreement shall terminate on the Sponsors no longer holding any Equity Shares in the Company; or
on a written agreement between APGL and the Company to terminate this Agreement; or
21.2
21.3
The rights and obligations of the Parties under this Agreement, which either expressly or by their nature survive the termination of this Agreement shall not
be extinguished by termination of this Agreement.
The termination of this Agreement in any of the circumstances aforesaid shall not in any way affect or prejudice any right accrued to any Party against the
other Parties, prior to such termination.
22.
CONFIDENTIALITY
22.1
No Relevant Party shall:
(i)
(ii)
disclose any information either in writing or orally to any Person which is not a Party to this Agreement; or
make or issue a public announcement, communication or circular,
about the investments made by APGL in the Company or the subject matter of, or the transactions referred to in, this Agreement or any other Transaction
Document, including by way of press release, promotional and publicity materials, posting of information on websites, granting of interviews or other
communications with the press, or otherwise, other than: (A) to such of its, officers, employees and advisers as reasonably require such information in
connection with the execution of the transaction contemplated in this Agreement or to comply with the terms of this Agreement or any other Transaction
Documents; (B) to the extent required by Law or regulation (including the rules of any stock exchange on which such Party’s shares are listed); (C) to the
extent required for it to enforce its rights under this Agreement; and (D) with the prior written consent of APGL. Before any information is disclosed or any
public announcement, communication or circulation made or issued pursuant to this Clause, such Relevant Party must consult with APGL in advance about
the timing, manner and content of the disclosure, announcement, communication or circulation (as the case may be).
22.2
Each Relevant Party shall expressly inform any Person to whom it discloses any information under this Clause 22 of the restrictions set out in Clause 22
with regards disclosure of such information and shall procure their compliance with the terms of this Clause 22 as if they each were a party to this
Agreement as such Relevant Party and such Relevant Party shall be responsible for any breach by any such Person of the provisions of this Clause 22.
18
23.
GOVERNING LAW AND ARBITRATION
23.1
This Agreement shall be governed by Indian law.
23.2
Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, including any question regarding its existence, validity or termination (a “ Dispute ”) shall
be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration under the Rules of Arbitration of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (the “ SIAC ”) in force at
that time (the “ SIAC Rules ”), which SIAC Rules are deemed to be incorporated by reference into this Clause 23.
23.3
There shall be 1 (one) arbitrator, who shall be nominated by agreement of the parties within 30 (thirty) days of receipt of the request for arbitration by the
respondent(s). If the sole arbitrator is not nominated within this time period, the SIAC shall make the appointment.
23.4
The place of arbitration shall be Singapore.
23.5
The language of arbitration shall be English.
23.6
The provisions of this Clause 23 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever.
24.
NOTICES
24.1
Any notice and other communications provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be first transmitted by facsimile transmission and then
confirmed by postage, prepaid registered post with acknowledgement due or by internationally recognized courier service, in the manner as elected by the
Party giving such notice.
In the case of notices to:
Sponsors:
Company:
Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
J-57, Third Floor, Saket, New Delhi-110017
Fascimile: +91-11-4654 8628
Attention: Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa
C-2324 Ranjit Ave, Amritsar, Punjab
Facsimile: +91-11-4654 8628
Attention: Harkanwal Singh Wadhwa
Azure Power India Private Limited
8, LSC, Pushp Vihar, Madangir,
New Delhi-110062
Facsimile: +91-11-49409807
Attention: Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
19
APGL
Azure Power Global Limited
1st Floor, The Exchange,
18 Cybercity, Ebene, Mauritius
Facsimile: +911149409807
Attention: Mr. Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
24.2
24.3
All notices shall be deemed to have been validly given (i) immediately, upon receipt of the confirmation report, if transmitted by facsimile transmission, or
(ii) 7 (seven) days after posting if sent by registered post, or (iii) 4 (four) days from the date of dispatch, if sent by courier.
Any Party may, from time to time, change its address, facsimile number or representative for receipt of notices provided for in this Agreement by giving to
the other not less than 15 (fifteen) Business Days prior written notice.
25.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
25.1
Injunctive Relief
In the event of a breach, the non-breaching Party shall be entitled to obtain an injunction restraining any further apprehended breach in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement without the necessity of establishing any actual damage.
25.2 Waiver
No forbearance, indulgence or relaxation or inaction by any Party at any time to require performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall in any
way affect, diminish or prejudice the right of such Party to require performance of that provision. Any waiver or acquiescence by any Party of any breach
of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver or acquiescence of any right under or arising out of this Agreement or of the
subsequent breach, or acquiescence to or recognition of rights other than as expressly stipulated in this Agreement.
25.3
Cumulative Rights
All remedies of either Party under this Agreement whether provided herein or conferred by statute, civil law, common law, custom, trade, or usage are
cumulative and not alternative and may be enforced successively or concurrently.
25.4
Partial Invalidity
If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under any law from time to time: (a) such provision will be fully severable;
(b) this Agreement will be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision had never comprised a part hereof; and (c) the
remaining provisions of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect and will not be affected by the illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision or by
its severance herefrom.
20
25.5
Amendments
No modification or amendment to this Agreement and no waiver of any of the terms or conditions hereof shall be valid or binding unless made in writing
and duly executed by the Parties to this Agreement.
25.6
Assignment
This Agreement and all of the rights and obligations under it may be assigned or transferred by APGL, at its sole discretion, to any Person to whom it
transfer Equity Securities held by it in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The rights and obligations of Sponsors and the Company under
this Agreement are personal to them respectively and neither the Company nor the Sponsors may assign all or part of its respective rights or obligations
under this Agreement without the prior written consent of APGL.
25.7
Conflicts
In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and those of the Articles, as amongst the Parties hereto, and the Company, to the extent
permitted by Law, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail and the Parties shall take all such steps as are within their powers, to ensure that the terms and
conditions of this Agreement are adhered to, and to the extent possible under the relevant Laws effect such amendments or alterations to the Articles to
carry out the conditions of this Agreement in letter and in spirit.
25.8
Entirety
This Agreement on its coming into effect shall constitute the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and with effect
from the Effective Date shall supersede all other agreements (including the Existing SHA), arrangements, understandings and assurances, either written or
oral, existing or proposed, between all or amongst any two or more Parties hereto or their Affiliates including with any third party relating to the subject
matter hereof.
The coming into effect of this Agreement shall not in any way affect or prejudice any right accrued to any party against the other parties under the Existing
SHA prior to the Effective Date.
25.9 Headings
The paragraph headings contained in this Agreement are for the convenience of the Parties and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this
Agreement.
25.10 Relationship
None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a partnership between the Parties hereto and no Party shall have any authority to
bind or shall be deemed to be the agent of the other in any way.
21
25.11 Costs
Each of the Parties hereto shall pay their own costs and expenses relating to the negotiation, preparation, and execution of this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The Company shall bear the stamp duty payable on this Agreement.
25.12 Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which is an original, but all of which constitute one and the same agreement.
25.13 Immunity
To the extent any Relevant Party may be entitled in any jurisdiction to claim for itself or its Assets immunity in respect of its obligations under this
Agreement or any other Transaction Document from any suit, execution, attachment (whether provisional or final, in aid of execution, before judgment or
otherwise) or other legal process or to the extent that in any jurisdiction that immunity (whether or not claimed) may be attributed to it or its Assets, such
Relevant Party irrevocably agrees not to claim and irrevocably waives such immunity to the fullest extent permitted now or in the future by the laws of
such jurisdiction.
———XXX———
( Intentionally
left
blank
)
22
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the below mentioned Parties have hereunto set their hands on the day month and year first hereinabove mentioned.
SIGNED AND DELIVERED BY
“ MR. INDERPREET SINGH WADHWA ”
SIGNED AND DELIVERED BY
“ MR. HARKANWAL SINGH WADHWA ”
23
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the below mentioned Party has hereunto set its hand on the day month and year first hereinabove mentioned.
SIGNED AND DELIVERED BY “ AZURE POWER
INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ” BY THE HAND OF
(the Authorised
Signatory) PURSUANT TO THE RESOLUTION
PASSED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
COMPANY ON
24
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the below mentioned Party has hereunto set its hand on the day month and year first hereinabove mentioned.
SIGNED AND DELIVERED BY “ AZURE POWER
GLOBAL LIMITED ” BY THE HAND OF
(the Authorised
Signatory) PURSUANT TO THE RESOLUTION
PASSED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
COMPANY ON
25
THIS DEED OF ADHERENCE is made on [ ]
SCHEDULE A – DEED OF ADHERENCE
BY [ ] of [ ] (the “ Covenantor ”) in favor of the persons whose names are set out in the Appendix to this Deed and is supplemental to the
Shareholders Agreement, dated [●], between Azure Power India Private Limited, Azure Power Global Limited and Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa and Mr. Harkanlal
Singh Wadhwa (the “ Shareholders Agreement ”) and entered into pursuant to the terms thereof.
THIS DEED WITNESSES as follows:
(1)
(2)
The Covenantor confirms that it has been given and read a copy of the Shareholders Agreement and hereby agrees for the benefit of each person named in
the Appendix to this Deed and each other person who, after the date, of this Deed, executes a deed of adherence to the Shareholders Agreement
substantially in the form set out in Schedule A thereof that it shall have the rights and be subject to the obligations of Azure Power Global Limited under
the terms of the Shareholders Agreement.
The Covenantor, by execution of this Deed, makes the representations and warranties contained in Clause 3 of the Shareholders Agreement for the benefit
of the other parties to the Shareholders Agreement, provided that such representations, warranties and acknowledgement shall be made as of the date of this
Deed and not as of the date of the Shareholders Agreement.
(3)
This Deed arising out of or in connection with it shall be governed by Indian law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Deed has been executed by the Covenantor and is intended to be and is hereby delivered on the date first above written.
Executed as a deed [●]
Signature
APPENDIX TO DEED OF ADHERENCE
[ Insert
names
of
those
persons
who
are
party
to
the
Shareholders
Agreement
on
the
date
of
this
Deed
of
Adherence.
]
****
26
Exhibit 8.1
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
A ZURE P OWER G LOBAL L IMITED
Exhibit 11.1
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
Message from the CEO
Azure Power is an organization built up on a dream to provide Energy which is clean, affordable and effectively infinite.
At Azure Power, we strive to conduct our business with the highest degree of honesty, integrity and ethical behavior.
We do business in a direct, clear, and ethical manner. We speak with honesty and courage. We are accountable for our words and actions and strive to build a
challenging and fulfilling work environment that rewards teamwork. We respect and recognize diverse work styles, lifestyles and cultural differences.
This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics provides an overview of the fundamental business values. These are based on our business ethics and our commitment
to integrity, which apply to all employees, officers and directors of Azure Power and its global subsidiaries around the world. It summarizes some of our most
important principles and policies. This Code is to be applied in conjunction with the laws and regulations of the land from where ever we operate.
The stewardship of Existence and Growth at Azure Power are marked through compelling need for Innovation, Perfection, Truthfulness and by being Good
Corporate Citizens. Our values etch the fundamental beliefs and guiding principles that lay the foundation on which we perform work and conduct ourselves.
We all have a responsibility to uphold the principles of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and promptly communicate any violations or potential
violations that may occur. Raising awareness about these topics, clarifying questions and resolving issues, are an essential part of making Azure Power a healthy
workplace and an outstanding place to work.
Best Wishes
Inderpreet Wadhwa
CEO
Page 2 | 15
Table of contents
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
Title
Introduction
Section
1
2 Applicability of the Code
3 Honest and ethical conduct
4 Conflict of interest
5 Corporate opportunities
6 Harassment
7 Social, health, environment and safety at the workplace
8 Alcohol/Drug-free workplace
9 Public disclosures
10 Confidentiality
11 Fair dealing
12 Protection and proper use of Company assets
13 Company funds
14 Disclosure
15 Compliance with governmental laws, rules and regulations/internal Company policies
16 Anti- Money Laundering
17 Sanctions
18 Compliance with Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
19 Business Expenditure
20 Political contributions
21 Charitable contributions
Insider trading
22
23
Interpretation of the code
24 Amendments of the code
25 Administration of code
26 Code of conduct training
27 Acknowledgement
Page 3 | 15
Page No.
4
4
4
4
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
8
8
9
9
9
10
11
11
11
12
12
12
13
15
1.
Introduction
The Azure Power Global Limited’s (referred to as “Azure Power” or “Company”) ‘Code of Business Conduct and Ethics’, hereafter, referred as Code is
intended to define and clarify the standards for conducting business and behavior at Azure Power. The Code is designed to be in-line with the requirements
of the section 406 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and Companies Act, 2013.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
This Code is designed to promote:
•
•
•
•
Honest and ethical conduct
Fair dealings with the stakeholders
Compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations
Prompt reporting of the violations of the Code
2.
Applicability of the Code
Every employee, officer and director of the Company is expected to read this document and promptly report to the management any actual or possible
violation of the Code.
3.
Honest and ethical conduct
All directors, officers and employees are expected to act in accordance with the highest standards of personal and professional integrity.
If directors, officers or employees have any questions regarding the best course of action in a particular situation or an ethical dilemma or if a person suspects
a possible violation of law(s), regulation(s) or Azure Power’s ethical standard (as listed in the Code), he/she should notify or seek clarity from:
•
•
•
His/her immediate superior;
Head of function/ department; or
Company designated Compliance Officer
4.
Conflicts of interest
A conflict of interest occurs when an individual’s private interest interferes in any way – or even appears to interfere – with the interests of the corporation as
a whole. A conflict on the part of an employee, officer or director may involve any action, inaction, or decision taken by him/her in the discharge of his or
her duties, which would materially affect his or her financial interest or those of his or her family members or any business with which the person is
associated. All employees, officers and directors shall also avoid any situation in which there is, or may appear to be, a potential conflict which could appear
to interfere with the employee’s judgment in making decisions in the best interest of the Company. All employees, officers and directors are also expected to
exercise care in the management of their private affairs so as not to be perceived to benefit from:
a) the use of information acquired solely by reason of their employment; or
Page 4 | 15
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
b) any transactions over which they can influence decisions (e.g.: investment, borrowing, purchases, sales, contracts etc.).
A conflict of interest may arise when:
•
•
•
•
•
There is an outside business activity that detracts an individual’s ability to devote appropriate time and attention to his/her responsibilities within the
Company;
There is a significant ownership interest in any supplier, customer, development partner or competitor of the Company;
There is a consulting or employment relationship with any supplier, customer, business associate or competitor of the Company;
Any employee, officer or director receives any payment, gift, inducements or incentives that may influence or appear to influence a key decision; or
An employee, officer or director serves on a board of directors or trustees or on a committee of any entity (whether profit or not-for profit) whose
interests reasonably would be expected to conflict with those of the Company.
The directors, officers and employees should be conscientious in avoiding any actual, potential or perceived conflict of interest with the Company. In case
there is perceived conflict of interest, he/she should fully disclose all the facts and circumstances thereof to the Company designated Compliance officer.
5.
Corporate opportunities
Directors, officers and employees are expressly prohibited from:
Taking opportunities that are discovered through the use of Company’s property, information, or position for personal gain;
Competing directly with the business of the Company or with any business that the Company is considering; and
If the Company finally decides to discontinue pursuing an opportunity that relates to the Company’s business activity, an employee, officer or
director may pursue such an activity only after disclosing it to the Company designated Compliance officer.
•
•
•
6.
Harassment
The Company is committed to provide a professional and dignified workplace, free from any discrimination or harassment.
The Company firmly believes in providing equal opportunity in all aspects of employment and will not tolerate any illegal discrimination or harassment of
any kind. Examples include derogatory comments based on race, gender, colour, sexual harassment etc.
An employee, officer or director who feels threatened and harassed must communicate his/her concerns to his immediate superior, head of the department or
to Company designated Compliance Officer through the whistle blower mechanism set forth in the Company’s Whistle-Blower Policy.
Page 5 | 15
7.
Social, health, environment and safety at the workplace
The safety of people at the workplace is a primary concern of the Company and each employee, officer and director must comply with all applicable safety
policies. All employees, officers and directors are subject to compliance with all local laws to help maintain a safe and healthy workplace. The Company
shall prevent the wasteful use of natural resources and be committed to improving the environment, particularly with regard to the emission of greenhouse
gases, and shall endeavour to offset the effect of climate change in all spheres of its activities. This should be in line with Social, Health, Environment and
Safety (the “SHES”) policy of the Company.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
8.
Alcohol/drug-free workplace
Employees, officers and directors are prohibited from using, selling, distributing, possessing or being under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs at the
workplace.
9.
Public disclosures
The person designated by the Board is appointed as the Company’s ‘spokesperson’ and he/she would interact with the press/ media. No other employee,
officer or director, except with the permission of the designated person, will make any statement in press/media.
Any inquiry from the media relating to Azure Power should be referred to the designated person. Only officially designated spokesperson may provide
comments for the media.
Employees are strictly prohibited from making any public disclosure or any communication or any statement unless specifically authorized by the designated
person.
10. Confidentiality
The directors, officers and employees shall maintain the confidentiality of classified information of the Company or customer or supplier or business
associate of the Company to which the Company has a duty to maintain confidentiality, except when disclosure is authorized or legally mandated. The
confidential information includes all non-public information (including private or proprietary information) that might be of use to competitors or harmful to
the Company or its associates. The use of confidential information for his/her own advantage or profit is also prohibited.
Examples of proprietary and confidential information include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Any system, information or process that gives Azure Power an opportunity to obtain an advantage over its competitors;
Non-public information about Azure Power’s operations;
Results, strategies and projections, including those on the acquisition and divestiture of businesses or business units;
Non-public information about Azure Power’s business plans, business processes and client relationships;
Non-public employee information;
Non-public information received in the course of employment about customers, suppliers and distributors;
Information about Azure Power’s technology, systems and proprietary products;
Financial information of Azure Power, such as profits, earnings and dividends;
Page 6 | 15
•
•
•
•
•
•
Announcement of new product introductions or developments;
Asset revaluations;
Investment decisions/plans;
Restructuring plans;
Major supply and delivery agreements; and
Plans to raise funds.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
Any information attained by any employee, officer or director during the individual’s tenure with Azure Power would be deemed to be proprietary to the
Company and should not be used by the individual at any point of time.
All employees, officers and directors must ensure proprietary and confidential information is treated with utmost cautiousness. All employees, officers and
directors should also take steps to ensure that business-related paperwork and documents are produced, copied, faxed, filed, stored and discarded by means
designed to minimize the risk of an unauthorized person accessing them. All employees, officers and directors must also ensure that access to work areas and
computers is well controlled.
11.
Fair dealing
Each director, officer and employee must deal fairly with customers, suppliers, and competitors of the Company. Each director, officer and employee may
not take unfair advantage of anyone through manipulation, concealment, abuse of confidential, proprietary or trade secret information, misrepresentation of
material facts, or any other unfair dealing practices.
The Company also seeks to compete with its competitors fairly and honestly. The Company seeks competitive advantages through superior performance, and
not through unethical or illegal business practices. In essence, the core of its fair dealing with respect to competition is that it does not share any form of
confidential information with its competitors. The Company prices its work independently of any competitor and does not communicate its methods or
intentions to bid to its competitors or enter into any agreements with its competitors or disclose information directly or indirectly which would distort
competition.
12.
Protection and proper use of Company’s assets
All directors, officers and employees should protect the Company’s assets and property and ensure their efficient use. Theft, carelessness, and waste of the
Company’s assets and property have a direct impact on the Company’s profitability.
Company’s assets should only be used for legitimate business purposes and by authorized employees, officers, directors or their designees. Assets include
cash, securities, business plans, consumer information, customer information, proprietary processes, quality standards, supplier information, intellectual
property trademarks and copyrights, physical property and services.
Company assets must not be used for personal benefit. The misappropriation of corporate assets would be considered breach of duty and may constitute an
act of fraud against the company.
Page 7 | 15
Azure Power reserves the right to monitor and inspect, without notice, all electronic communications data and information transmitted on the network and
electronic files located on Company servers and computer devices owned by the Company.
All employees, officers and directors must have permission from respective head of department or the Board before using or authorizing the use of any
Company asset, including information, work product or trademark-outside the designated Company responsibilities.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
13. Company funds
All employees, officers and directors are responsible for safeguarding, and making proper and efficient use of Company funds, over which he/she exercises
control, by following procedures to prevent their loss, theft and unauthorized use. Every employee, officer and director must take reasonable steps to ensure
that the Company receives good value for its funds spent and must maintain records in accordance with the Company’s internal controls at all times, fully
and accurately reflecting all transactions. All reports, vouchers, bills, payroll and service, measurement and performance records and other essential data
must be prepared carefully and honestly. Some of the activities to be specifically adhered to are:
No employee, officer or director shall use Company funds that arise in the course of his or her employment, to pursue personal opportunities or gain;
No secret funds or undisclosed or unrecorded fund shall be established for any purpose;
No false or artificial entries shall be made in the books and records of the Company for any reason, and no employee, officer or director shall engage in any
arrangement that results in such prohibited act, even if directed to do so by a supervisor;
No payment shall be approved or made with the agreement or understanding that any part of such payment is to be used for any purpose other than that
described by documents supporting the payment;
There will be no disbursements or receipts of corporate funds outside of Azure Power’s established system of accountability; and
No employee, officer or director shall incur unreasonable expenses on behalf of the Company.
•
•
•
•
•
•
14. Disclosure
The Company’s policy is to provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and reasonable disclosure in reports and documents that are filed with or submitted to any
outside agency and/or for other public communications.
15. Compliance with governmental laws, rules and regulations/internal Company policies
Employees, officers and directors of the Company must comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations. Employees, officers and
directors must acquire appropriate knowledge of the legal requirements relating to their duties sufficient to enable them to recognize potential dangers, and to
know when to seek advice from the Company designated Compliance officer.
Page 8 | 15
16. Anti- money laundering
All employees, officers and directors of the Company must ensure that the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries are conducted at all times in
compliance with all applicable financial record keeping and reporting requirements, including those of the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
of 1970, as amended, the applicable anti-money laundering statutes of all applicable jurisdictions, the rules and regulations thereunder and any related or
similar rules, regulations or guidelines issued, administered or enforced by any governmental or regulatory agency (collectively, the “Anti-Money
Laundering Laws”).
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
17.
Sanctions
The Company and its directors, officers and employees shall carry out business in strict observance with all applicable national and international laws and
regulations relating to sanctions. The Company will not condone actual or even the appearance of breach of these rules. US sanctions legislation prohibits
certain dealings with designated entities and nationals. Iran Sanctions Act, including subsequent sanctions acts against Iran (including but not limited to
CISADA, National Defense Authorization Act, Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act, Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act (“Iran
Sanctions”), Ukraine related sanctions, U.S. Executive Orders and other US sanctions legislations apply to US persons and non-US persons in some
circumstances. Other sanctions legislations which may apply to the Company include the UN Security Council Resolutions and EU Council Regulations. As
a matter of policy, the Company will not engage in sanctionable transactions with entities or persons on the list of Specially Designated Nationals (“SDNs”)
published by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the United States, any designated entities under the EU Regulations or with any other
entities or persons which would be at risk of violating any applicable sanctions regulations.
Although the Company is not involved in the export or re-export business, transactions with the companies or individuals listed on the Department of
Commerce’s List of Denied Persons or on the “Entity List” is prohibited.
All employees, officers and directors of the Company must always stay vigilant and never violate any of the above rules. If an individual discovers any risk
of breach in the above rules, such individual must report immediately to his or her immediate superior, the head of function/ department or Company
designated Compliance Officer. Failure to report a concern related to these rules will be treated seriously. If you are in any doubt, you are required to seek
advice.
18. Compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and similar laws in other countries that apply to the Company prohibit promising, authorizing or giving
anything of value, directly or indirectly, to a non-U.S. government official to influence the misuse of the official’s position or secure an improper advantage
in an effort to win or retain business. A non-U.S. government official is defined broadly and can be any official or employee of any non-U.S. government
department, agency or state-owned company; officers or employees of public international organizations (such as the United Nations); any non-U.S. party
officials or political candidates. Also, international anti- corruption laws, such as the UK Bribery Act, make it a crime to offer or pay bribes or kickbacks to
private parties as well as government officials.
Page 9 | 15
The prohibition under the FCPA is very broad, and covers:
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
•
•
•
cash payments;
non-cash “payments”, benefits, and favours; and
in certain circumstances, even gifts, entertainment, and hosted travel or training which would otherwise be deemed legitimate business expenditures
The FCPA prohibits these payments whether they are made directly or indirectly through third parties, such as agents, consultants, channel partners,
resellers, or other representatives and affiliates of the Company where the Company has majority ownership, including joint ventures and special purpose
vehicles (“SPVs”) and other entities over which the Company possesses corporate control, regardless of whether such payments or benefits are actually paid
or given.
In other words, a “willful blindness” to a suspected improper payment or a mere promise of something improper can be the basis for a violation of the FCPA.
The FCPA also requires the Company to maintain internal accounting controls and keep books and records that accurately reflect all transactions and the
disposition of assets, which includes but is not limited to an obligation to keep accurate records regarding gifts, entertainment and/or travel provided to
foreign officials.
Bribes
All employees, officers and directors of the Company must not engage in any form of bribery, to any government official, private party or any third party
(such as an agent or third party intermediary) either directly or indirectly.
Facilitation payments and kickbacks
The Company prohibits all its employees, officers and directors from making any facilitation payments directly or indirectly on behalf of the Company.
Facilitation payments are a form of bribery made for the purpose of expediting or facilitating the performance of a public official for a routine governmental
action, and not to obtain or retain business or any improper business advantage.
19.
Business expenditure
Offering or receiving any gift, gratuity or entertainment that might be perceived to unfairly influence a business relationship should be avoided.
Business gifts and entertainment are customary courtesies designed to build goodwill among business partners. These courtesies include such things as meals
and beverages, tickets to sporting or cultural events, discounts not available to the general public, travel, accommodation and other
Page 10 | 15
merchandise or services. In some cultures they play an important role in business relationships. However, a problem may arise when such courtesies
compromise – or appear to compromise – the recipient’s ability to make objective and fair business decisions.
This policy applies to all employees, officers, and directors offering gifts and entertainment to the Company’s business associates.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
20.
Political contributions
The Company will not make donations or contributions, whether in cash or kind, in support of any political parties or candidates.
21. Charitable contributions
All contributions will be made by the Company and not by employees, officers, and directors in his/ her individual capacity after obtaining prior written
approval from the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
22.
Insider trading
It is the trading that takes place when the employees, officers or directors possessing privileged and confidential information about important events use the
special advantage of that knowledge to reap profits or avoid losses on the stock market, to the detriment of the source of the information and to the typical
investors who buy or sell their stock without the advantage of ‘inside information.’
All employees, officers and directors are prohibited to trade in the securities (including equity securities, convertible securities, options, bonds and any stock
index containing the security) of the Company during employment with the Company while in the possession of material, non-public information (also
known as ‘inside information’) regarding the Company.
If any employee, officer or director believes that the individual has come into possession of an inside information, such individual may not execute any trade
in the securities of the Company without first consulting with the Company designated Compliance Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who will then
determine whether such trade would violate Azure Power’s policy/applicable laws. The definition of ‘material, non-public information’ is broad. As a rule of
thumb, any information that would affect the value of stock or other securities should be considered material. Examples of information that is generally
considered “material” may include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Financial results or forecasts, or any information that indicates the Company’s financial results may exceed or fall short of forecasts or expectations;
Important new products or services;
Pending or contemplated acquisitions or dispositions, including mergers, tender offers or joint venture proposals;
Possible management changes or changes of control;
Pending or contemplated public or private sales of debt or equity securities;
Acquisition or loss of a significant customer or contract;
Significant write-offs; and
Initiation or settlement of significant litigation.
Page 11 | 15
Information is “non-public” if it has not been made generally available to the public by means of a press release or other means of widespread distribution
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
23.
Interpretation of the Code
Any question or interpretation under this Code shall be addressed to the Board or any person/committee authorized by the Board. Any waiver of the Code for
executive officers or directors may be made only by the Board or a designated person/committee. An individual seeking a waiver of this Code shall make full
disclosure of the particular circumstances to the Board or the designated person/committee.
24. Amendments of the Code
We are committed to continuously reviewing and updating our policies and procedures. Therefore, this Code is subject to modification. Amendment of any
provision of this Code must be approved by the Company’s Board and in applicable regulatory filings pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, together
with details about the nature of the amendment.
25. Administration of the Code
Distribution
All employees, officers and directors of the Company shall receive a copy of this Code and are required to acknowledge reading and understanding the
document. Further, all new employees, officers and directors are mandatorily required to read, understand and acknowledge their understanding at the time
of joining the Company.
Approvals
Any waiver of or approval of non-compliance with any provision of this Code requires the prior written approval of the Company’s Board or a committee of
the Board with authority to grant such waivers and approvals. Copies of these approvals should be maintained by the Company and made available to
auditors or investigating authorities.
Reporting of violations
All employees, officers, and directors who are or become aware of or suspect a violation of this Code are under an obligation to report to the designated
person or committee of the Company. Violations or suspected violations should be reported by contacting the Company designated Compliance Officer or
reporting as per the procedures set out in the Company’s Whistle-Blower Policy. Reports may also be made anonymously.
The Company will not take any adverse action against anyone for providing truthful information relating to a violation of law or Company policy, and the
Company will not tolerate any retaliation against persons asking questions or making good faith reports of possible violations of this Policy. Anyone who
retaliates or attempts to retaliate will be disciplined. Any person who believes he or she has been retaliated against should immediately follow the
instructions in the Company’s Whistle-Blower Policy.
Page 12 | 15
Investigations
Investigations of an alleged violation of the Code shall not be commenced in any form by any Business unit/ Department/ Project Site without the written
approval of the Company designated Compliance officer. Investigation process has been defined in the Company’s Whistle-Blower Policy.
All employees, officers and directors are expected to cooperate with investigations undertaken or approved by the Company designated Compliance officer.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
Disciplinary action on non-compliance
Violations of this Code will not be tolerated. Any employee, officer, or director who violates this Code will be subject to disciplinary action up to and
including termination of employment or relationship with the Company.
26. Code of conduct training
The code requires all employees and directors to undergo the Company’s code of conduct training course/s, which will be rolled out by the Company from
time to time. The course/s may be conducted on-line or in-person and will be administered by the Company designated Compliance officer.
Notification for these trainings will be sent via email that they are required to take the training. Those required to take such course/s must do so within the
notified timeframe and repeat the course/s as and when required.
Failure to do so without justification will be viewed very seriously by the Company and could be considered as violation of the code of conduct.
A.
ANNUAL TRAINING
Annual training is required for all Company personnel and directors. All relevant Company personnel will receive on-line or in-person trainings.
B.
ON-BOARD TRAINING
All New employees in the Company shall be provided with code of conduct training by the Human Resource Department as part of their on-boarding
process.
Page 13 | 15
C.
TRAINING COMPLETION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Each attendee should be provided with and sign a certification that states that the employee understood the training and understands his or her obligation to
abide by the Company’s code of conduct.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
D.
TRAINING RECORDS
For each training session conducted, the Company designated Compliance Officer will create and retain a record of the training that includes the following:
•
•
•
the name of the person conducting the training,
a list of attendees, and
a copy of the materials used.
These training records shall be retained for a period of five (5) years from the date of the training.
Page 14 | 15
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Acknowledgment of receipt of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
For the employees —
I have received, read and understood the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Code) for employees. I understand the standards and policies contained
in the Code and understand that there may be additional policies or laws specific to my job. I agree to comply with the Code, any Company policies, and the legal
and regulatory requirements applicable to my job.
If I have questions concerning the meaning or application of the Code, any Company policies, or the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to my job, I
understand that I can consult my immediate superior or head of department / function or Company designated Compliance officer and that my questions or reports
to these sources will be maintained in confidence.
Name:
Signature:
Date:
Please sign and return this form to the HR department, for records.
Annual confirmation
Page 15 | 15
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 12.1
I, Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa, certify that:
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Azure Power Global Limited;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Date: June 19, 2017
By:
Name:
Title:
/s/ Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 12.2
I, Surendra Kumar Gupta, certify that:
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Azure Power Global Limited:
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Date: June 19, 2017
By:
Name:
Title:
/s/ Surendra Kumar Gupta
Surendra Kumar Gupta
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Azure Power Global Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Exhibit 13.1
Date: June 19, 2017
By:
Name:
Title:
/s/ Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
Inderpreet Singh Wadhwa
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Azure Power Global Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Surendra Kumar Gupta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Exhibit 13.2
Date: June 19, 2017
By:
Name:
Title:
/s/ Surendra Kumar Gupta
Surendra Kumar Gupta
Chief Financial Officer