Dear Fellow Stockholders:
The past year was both exciting and transformational for our
company. In the fall of 2014, the management team and the
Board of Directors determined that the best way to create
significant value for stockholders of The Babcock & Wilcox
Company (BWC) was to spin-off the Power Generation business.
Effective on July 1, 2015, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
(B&W), became an independent, publicly traded company,
and while the spin-off was a bold decision, it was also the right
decision. That shows in the value created in just 13 months for
our long-term stockholders, who realized a 45% increase in the
value of their shares from the time we announced the spin in
November 2014 to December 31, 2015. It also shows in B&W’s
performance as a stand-alone company and the opportunities
we have to create additional value in the future for stockholders
of “the new B&W.”
While the corporate team was executing the spin, B&W’s
business units focused on our projects and our customers,
generating a strong year in 2015, with an 18% increase in
revenue and a 15% increase in adjusted operating income.
We also improved free cash flow, repurchased more than
1.3 million shares of our stock and increased our cash on
hand by $57.6 million in our first six months of operation
as an independent company.
Our Global Power segment led B&W’s growth, increasing
revenue more than 35% for the full year 2015 compared to
2014. Our strategy to expand this business internationally
continued to gain traction, with four awards for new power
plants in 2015 including three renewable waste-to-energy
plants in the United Kingdom.
Our expanded global sales team increased our backlog by
$80 million and grew our pipeline of potential work by $200
million. We expect Global Power will continue to lead organic
growth for our company and we are confident our product
mix, and the support of our strong sales team, will allow us to
continue to expand our reach.
Our Global Services segment increased full-year revenue by
$25 million over 2014, to $933 million, despite challenges in
the U.S. coal-fired power generation market. We also drove
increased efficiency in this segment, becoming more lean,
lowering our fixed overhead and transitioning out of several
older manufacturing facilities. Across B&W’s operations, we are
embracing lean manufacturing and continuous improvement,
and they are becoming, quite simply, “the way we do business.”
In our Industrial Environmental Segment, B&W MEGTEC
delivered strong results in 2015, marking its first full year
of operation as a B&W company.
With the combined bookings of our three operating
segments, including the new renewable energy work in
Global Power, B&W’s exposure to coal-related revenues
now stands at 50%, down from 57% in 2014.
In 2016, we’ll continue executing our three-pronged strategy
to optimize our business and improve efficiency, to achieve
core growth in international markets, and to successfully
drive growth and diversification through execution of a
disciplined acquisition program.
Across B&W, we’ll also stay focused on safety and we’ll
maintain our commitment to the highest standards of
ethics. We will continue making the strategic decisions
needed to transform B&W from a 149-year-old business
focused primarily on U.S. coal-fired power generation to a
global, diversified industrial leader serving the power and
environmental markets.
We value and appreciate your support, your confidence
in our company’s future and your continued investment in
Babcock & Wilcox.
Sincerely,
E. James Ferland
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
(cid:95)(cid:3) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
OR
(cid:133)(cid:3) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-36876
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
THE HARRIS BUILDING
13024 BALLANTYNE CORPORATE PLACE
SUITE 700
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
47-2783641
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
28277
(Zip Code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (704) 625-4900
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Name of each Exchange
on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes (cid:133) No (cid:59)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange Act. Yes (cid:133) No (cid:59)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:59) No (cid:133)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes (cid:59) No (cid:133)
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:133)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
(cid:133)(cid:3)
(cid:59)(cid:3)
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
(cid:133)(cid:3)
(cid:133)(cid:3)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes (cid:133) No (cid:59)
The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on the last business
day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter (based on the closing sales price on the New York Stock
Exchange on June 30, 2015) was approximately $1.1 billion.
The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding at January 31, 2016 was 51,992,669.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference
into Part III of this Form 10-K.
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
INDEX - FORM 10-K
Item 1.
Business
PART I
Overview
Our Business Strategies
Business Segments
Acquisition
Joint Ventures
Contracts
Backlog
Foreign Operations
Customers
Competition
Raw Materials and Suppliers
Employees
Patents and Licenses
Research and Development Activities
Permits and Licenses
Environmental
Executive Officers of Registrant
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Information
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Available Information
Risks Relating to Our Industry and Our Business
Risks Relating to Our 2015 Spin-Off From Our Former Parent
Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
P A R T I I
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Results of Operations – Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
i
PAGE
1
1
2
3
3
4
4
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
9
9
21
24
26
26
26
27
28
30
31
31
32
39
42
42
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years
Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and
2014
Consolidated and Combined Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2015, 2014 and 2013
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Other Information
PART III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
46
48
49
50
51
52
54
55
56
97
97
97
97
97
97
98
100
100
100
100
101
105
ii
PART I
Item 1.
BUSINESS
Overview
In this annual report on Form 10-K, unless the context otherwise indicates, "B&W," "we," "us," the "Company" and
"our" mean Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated and combined subsidiaries.
On June 8, 2015, the board of directors of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (now known as BWX Technologies,
Inc.) ("BWC" or the "former Parent") approved the spin-off of B&W through the distribution of shares of B&W common stock
to holders of BWC common stock. The distribution of B&W common stock was made on June 30, 2015, and consisted of one
share of B&W common stock for every two shares of BWC common stock to holders of BWC common stock as of 5:00 p.m.
New York City time on the record date, June 18, 2015. Cash was paid in lieu of any fractional shares of B&W common stock.
On June 30, 2015, B&W became a separate publicly traded company, and BWC did not retain any ownership interest in B&W.
We filed our Form 10 describing the spin-off with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which was declared effective on
June 16, 2015. The spin-off is further described in Note 1 to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in
Item 8.
B&W is a leading technology-based provider of advanced fossil and renewable power generation and environmental
equipment that includes a broad suite of boiler products and environmental systems, and services for power and industrial uses.
We specialize in technology and engineering for power generation and various other industries, the related procurement,
erection and specialty manufacturing of equipment, and the provision of related services, including:
•
•
•
•
high-pressure equipment for energy conversion, such as boilers fueled by coal, oil, bitumen, natural gas, and
renewables including municipal solid waste and biomass fuels;
environmental control systems for both power generation and industrial applications to incinerate, filter, capture,
recover and/or purify air, liquid and vapor-phase effluents from a variety of power generation and specialty
manufacturing processes;
aftermarket support for the global installed base of operating plants with a wide variety of products and technical
services including replacement parts, retrofit and upgrade capabilities, field engineering, construction,
inspection, operations and maintenance, condition assessment and other technical support; and
engineered-to-order services, products and systems for energy conversion worldwide and related auxiliary
equipment, such as burners, pulverizers, soot blowers and ash and material handling systems.
We operate in three reportable segments: Global Power, Global Services and Industrial Environmental. Through our
Global Power segment, we engineer, manufacture, procure, construct and commission boilers fueled by fossil fuels and
renewables in addition to environmental systems and related auxiliary equipment primarily to steam generating customers
globally. Through our Global Services segment, we provide aftermarket products and services to steam generating utilities
worldwide and numerous industrial customers globally. We have supplied the boilers for approximately 35% of the coal-fired
electric generating capacity in the United States. We also provide aftermarket services for global installed units delivered by
other original equipment suppliers. Through our Industrial Environmental segment, we provide a range of environmental
technology and services to numerous industrial end markets globally. We established the operations constituting this segment
through Babcock & Wilcox MEGTEC Holdings, Inc. ("MEGTEC"), which we acquired on June 20, 2014. See Note 17 in our
consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8 for additional information about our segments.
1
Our overall activity depends significantly on the capital expenditures and operations and maintenance expenditures
of global electric power generating companies, other steam-using industries and industrial facilities with environmental
compliance needs. Several factors influence these expenditures, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
prices for electricity, along with the cost of production and distribution including the cost of fuel within the
United States or internationally;
demand for electricity and other end products of steam-generating facilities;
requirements for environmental improvements;
impact of potential United States and international requirements to significantly limit or reduce greenhouse gas
emissions in the future;
environmental policies which include waste-to-energy or biomass as options to meet legislative requirements and
clean energy portfolio standards;
level of capacity utilization at operating power plants and other industrial uses of steam production;
requirements for maintenance and upkeep at operating power plants to combat the accumulated effects of usage;
overall strength of the industrial industry; and
ability of electric power generating companies and other steam users to raise capital.
Customer demand is heavily affected by the variations in our customers' business cycles and by the overall
economies and energy and environmental policies of the countries in which they operate.
Our Business Strategies
As a new and independent company, B&W continues to be a leading technology-based provider of advanced fossil
and renewable power generation equipment with a broad suite of new build boiler and environmental products, and continues
to provide a comprehensive platform of aftermarket services to a large global installed base of power generation facilities. In
addition, B&W is a leading provider of technology and services in the growing market for industrial environmental systems.
Across all of our capabilities, we continue to specialize in engineering, specialty manufacturing, procurement and erection of
equipment and technology for a large and global customer base.
We operate in three segments: Global Power, Global Services and Industrial Environmental. In general, we operate in
capital-intensive industries and rely on large contracts for a substantial amount of our revenues.
Our strategy as an independent company focuses on four important areas:
•
•
•
enhancing the efficiency of our operating model and asset base to optimize our approach to profitable organic
growth and enhanced free cash flow across our range of global markets;
pursuing growth opportunities in the international power generation market by expanding our market and
operation presences in regions around the world where we expect continued demand growth for both our
traditional and new, renewable technology and services;
seeking and executing additional strategic acquisitions that focus on expanding our existing capabilities as well
as entering adjacent markets; and
• maintaining our commitment to safety and exceeding our customer expectations.
2
Business Segments
Global Power
Our Global Power segment represents our worldwide new build boiler and environmental products businesses that
serve large steam generating and industrial customers. The segment provides a full suite of product and service offerings
including engineering, procurement, specialty manufacturing, construction and commissioning. Our boilers include utility
boilers and industrial boilers fired with coal and natural gas as well as renewables including biomass and municipal solid waste.
Our boiler products include advanced supercritical boilers, subcritical boilers, fluidized bed boilers, biomass-fired boilers,
waste-to-energy boilers, chemical recovery boilers, industrial power boilers, package boilers, heat recovery steam generators
and waste heat boilers.
Our environmental systems offerings include air pollution control products and related equipment for the treatment of
nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, fine particulate, mercury, acid gases and other hazardous air emissions, including carbon
dioxide capture and sequestration technologies, wet and dry flue gas desulfurization systems, catalytic and non-catalytic
nitrogen oxides reduction systems, low nitrogen oxides burners and overfire air systems, fabric filter baghouses, wet and dry
electrostatic precipitators, mercury control systems and dry sorbent injection for acid gas mitigation.
We also receive license fees and royalty payments through licensing agreements on our proprietary technologies.
Our Global Power segment generated revenues of $640.0 million, $471.9 million and $712.5 million in 2015, 2014
and 2013, respectively, which was 36.4%, 31.8% and 40.3% of our total revenues in those years, respectively.
Global Services
Our Global Services segment provides a comprehensive mix of aftermarket products and services to support peak
efficiency and availability of steam generating and associated environmental and auxiliary equipment, serving large steam
generating utility and industrial customers globally. Our products and services include replacement parts, field technical
services, retrofit and upgrade projects, fuel switching and repowering projects, construction and maintenance services, start-up
and commissioning, training programs and plant operations and maintenance for our full complement of boiler, environmental
and auxiliary equipment. Our auxiliary equipment includes boiler cleaning equipment and material handling equipment.
Our Global Services segment generated revenues of $933.6 million, $908.7 million and $1,055.2 million in 2015,
2014 and 2013, respectively, which was 53.1%, 61.1% and 59.7% of our total revenues in those years, respectively.
Industrial Environmental
Our Industrial Environmental segment represents our environmental products and services business serving
numerous industrial end markets such as the chemical, pharmaceutical, energy storage, packaging, and automotive markets.
The segment designs, engineers and manufactures products including oxidizers, solvent and distillation systems, wet and dry
electrostatic precipitators, scrubbers and heat recovery systems. The segment also provides specialized industrial process
systems and equipment.
Our Industrial Environmental segment generated revenues of $183.7 million and $105.4 million in 2015 and 2014,
respectively, which was 10.5% and 7.1% of our total revenues in those years, respectively.
Acquisition
In June 2014, we completed the acquisition of MEGTEC for $142.8 million, net of cash acquired. MEGTEC designs,
engineers, manufactures and services air pollution control systems and coating / drying equipment for a variety of industrial
applications and complements our environmental products and solutions offerings. See Note 3 to our consolidated and
combined financial statements included in Item 8 for additional information.
3
Joint Ventures
We participate in the ownership of a variety of entities with third parties, primarily through corporations, limited
liability companies and partnerships, which we refer to as "joint ventures." We enter into joint ventures primarily for specific
market access and to enhance our manufacturing, design and global production operations as well as reduce operating and
financial risk profiles. We generally account for our investments in joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. Our
unconsolidated joint ventures are described below.
•
•
Babcock & Wilcox Beijing Company, Ltd. ("BWBC") We own equal interests in this entity with Beijing
Jingcheng Machinery Electric Holding Company, Ltd. BWBC was formed in 1986 and is located in Beijing,
China. Its main activities are the design, manufacture, production and sale of various power plant and industrial
boilers. BWBC expands our markets internationally and provides additional capacity to our boiler products.
Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Energy Solutions Private Limited ("TBWES") In June 2010, one of our
subsidiaries and Thermax Ltd., a boiler manufacturer based in India, formed a joint venture to build subcritical
and highly efficient supercritical boilers and pulverizers for the Indian utility boiler market. We have licensed to
TBWES our technology for subcritical boilers 300 MW and larger, highly efficient supercritical boilers and coal
pulverizers. In 2013, TBWES finalized construction of a facility in India designed to produce parts for up to
3,000 MW of utility boiler capacity per year.
• Halley & Mellowes Pty. Ltd. ("HMA") Diamond Power International, Inc., one of our wholly owned
subsidiaries, owns an interest in this Australian company, which was formed in 1984. HMA manufactures, sells
and services a wide range of capital plant equipment to a diverse range of industries. These include the mining,
processing, materials handling, water management, power generation, and oil and gas industries. HMA offers
complete service, from equipment selection to installation to commissioning and maintenance, with offices and
service facilities located in and serving Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia and South Africa.
• Other Project Related Ventures From time to time, we partner with other companies to better meet the needs of
our customers, which can result in project-related joint venture entities. Examples of this include BWM
Ottumwa Environmental Partners, where we formed a joint venture with Burns & McDonnell Engineering
Company, Inc., to engineer, procure, and construct environmental control systems for the Ottumwa Generating
Station, a United States based project that was substantially completed in 2014. We also formed BWL Energy
Ltd. with Lagan to complete the construction of the Teeside waste wood fired boiler project in the United
Kingdom. This joint venture combines our expertise in the waste-to-energy power plant design, engineering,
procurement and construction with our partner's civil construction capability to provide a full turnkey product to
our customer.
Contracts
We execute our contracts through a variety of methods, including fixed-price, cost-plus, target price cost incentive,
cost-reimbursable or some combination of these methods. Contracts are usually awarded through a competitive bid process.
Factors that customers may consider include price, technical capabilities of equipment and personnel, plant or equipment
availability, efficiency, safety record and reputation.
Fixed-price contracts are for a fixed amount to cover all costs and any profit element for a defined scope of work.
Fixed-price contracts entail more risk to us because they require us to predetermine both the quantities of work to be performed
and the costs associated with executing the work. For further specification see "Risk Factors Related to Our Business – We are
subject to risks associated with contractual pricing in our industry, including the risk that, if our actual costs exceed the costs
we estimate on our fixed-price contracts, our profitability will decline, and we may suffer losses" as outlined in Item 1A of this
report.
4
We have contracts that extend beyond one year. Most of our long-term contracts have provisions for progress
payments. We attempt to cover anticipated increases in labor, material and service costs of our long-term contracts either
through an estimate of such changes, which is reflected in the original price, or through risk-sharing mechanisms, such as
escalation or price adjustments for items such as labor and commodity prices.
We generally recognize our contract revenues and related costs on a percentage-of-completion basis. Accordingly, we
review contract price and cost estimates regularly as the work progresses and reflect adjustments in profit proportionate to the
percentage of completion in the period when we revise those estimates. To the extent that these adjustments result in a
reduction or an elimination of previously reported profits with respect to a project, we would recognize a charge against current
earnings, which could be material.
Our arrangements with customers frequently require us to provide letters of credit, bid and performance bonds or
guarantees to secure bids or performance under contracts, which may involve significant amounts for contract security.
In the event of a contract deferral or cancellation, we generally would be entitled to recover costs incurred, settlement
expenses and profit on work completed prior to deferral or termination. Significant or numerous cancellations could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Other sales, such as parts and certain aftermarket service activities, are not in the form of long-term contracts, and we
recognize revenues as goods are delivered and work is performed.
Backlog
Backlog represents the dollar amount of revenue we expect to recognize in the future from contracts awarded and in
progress. Not all of our expected revenue from a contract award is recorded in backlog for a variety of reasons, including that
some projects are awarded and completed within the same fiscal period.
Backlog is not a measure defined by generally accepted accounting principles. It is possible that our methodology for
determining backlog may not be comparable to methods used by other companies. Backlog may not be indicative of future
operating results, and projects in our backlog may be cancelled, modified or otherwise altered by customers. Additionally,
because we operate globally, our backlog is impacted by changes in foreign currencies.
We generally include expected revenue from contracts in our backlog when we receive written confirmation from our
customers authorizing the performance of work and committing the customer to payment for work performed. Accordingly, we
exclude from backlog orders or arrangements that have been awarded but that we have not been authorized to begin
performance.
We do not include the value of our unconsolidated joint venture contracts in backlog. See Note 4 to the consolidated
and combined financial statements included in this annual report for financial information on our equity method investments.
Our backlog at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Global Power
Global Services
Industrial Environmental
Total backlog
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2014
$
$
1,118
1,143
66
2,328
48% $
49%
3%
100% $
946
1,229
72
2,248
42%
55%
3%
100%
5
Of the December 31, 2015 backlog, we expect to recognize approximate revenues as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
Global Power
Global Services
Industrial Environmental
Total backlog
Foreign Operations
2016
2017
Thereafter
Total
$
$
548 $
445
65
1,058 $
229 $
96
—
325 $
341 $
603
2
946 $
1,118
1,143
66
2,328
Our Canadian operations serve the Canadian electric utility, industrial power and oil production markets. Our
operations in Denmark provide comprehensive services to companies in the waste-to-energy sector of the power generation
market, primarily in Europe. Our joint ventures in China and India primarily serve the power generation needs of their local
domestic and other utility markets, but both joint ventures participate as manufacturing partners on certain of our foreign
projects. We also expanded a manufacturing facility in Mexico during 2015 to serve the North American market. The functional
currency of these entities is not the United States dollar, and as a result, we are subject to exchange rate fluctuations that impact
our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. For additional information on the geographic distribution of our
revenues, see Note 17 to our consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8 of this annual report.
Customers
We provide our products and services to a diverse customer base that includes utilities and other power producers
located around the world. We have no customers that individually accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated and
combined revenues in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 or 2013.
Competition
With 149 years of experience and having supplied more than 300,000 MW of equivalent steam-generating capacity in
more than 800 facilities in over 90 countries and some of the world's largest and most efficient steam-generating systems, we
have a competitive advantage in our experience and technical capability to reliably convert a wide range of fuels to steam. Our
strong, installed base in North America also yields competitive advantages in the Global Services segment, although this
segment of the market is highly competitive and price sensitive. We compete with a number of domestic and foreign-based
companies specializing in steam generating systems technology, equipment and services, including GE, Doosan, Babcock
Power, Inc., Amec Foster Wheeler, CNIM Group, Hitachi Zosen Corporation and MH Power Systems, Ltd.; a variety of
engineering and construction companies with respect to the installation of steam generating systems; a number of additional
companies in the markets for environmental control equipment and related specialized industrial equipment; and other suppliers
of replacement parts, repair and alteration services and other services required to retrofit and maintain existing steam
generating systems. The primary bases of competition are price, technical capabilities, quality, timeliness of performance,
breadth of products and services and willingness to accept project risks.
Raw Materials and Suppliers
Our operations use raw materials such as carbon and alloy steels in various forms and components and accessories
for assembly, which are available from numerous sources. We generally purchase these raw materials and components as
needed for individual contracts. We do not depend on a single source of supply for any significant raw materials. Although
shortages of some raw materials have existed from time to time, no serious shortage exists at the present time.
6
Employees
At December 31, 2015, we had approximately 5,700 employees worldwide, not including 2,500 joint venture
employees. Of our hourly employees, approximately 1,200 are union-affiliated, covered by seven union agreements related to
active facilities in Ohio, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Mexico, Denmark, and Scotland, of which two expire in 2016 and the
remainder in 2017 or 2018. We consider our relationships with our employees and unions to be in good standing.
Patents and Licenses
We currently hold a large number of United States and foreign patents and have patent applications pending. We have
acquired patents and technology licenses and granted technology licenses to others when we have considered it advantageous
for us to do so. Although in the aggregate our patents and licenses are important to us, we do not regard any single patent or
license or group of related patents or licenses as critical or essential to our business as a whole. In general, we depend on our
technological capabilities and the application of know-how, rather than patents and licenses, in the conduct of our various
businesses.
Research and Development Activities
Our research and development activities are related to the development and improvement of new and existing
products and equipment, as well as conceptual and engineering evaluation for translation into practical applications. We charge
to research and development cost the costs of research and development unrelated to specific contracts as incurred. Research
and development activities totaled $16.5 million $18.5 million and $21.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014
and 2013, respectively.
Permits and Licenses
We are required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses and
certificates with respect to our operations. The kinds of permits, licenses and certificates required in our operations depend
upon a number of factors. We are not aware of any material noncompliance and believe our operations and certifications are
currently in compliance with all relevant permits, licenses and certifications.
Environmental
We have been identified as a potentially responsible party at various cleanup sites under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA"). CERCLA and other
environmental laws can impose liability for the entire cost of cleanup on any of the potentially responsible parties, regardless of
fault or the lawfulness of the original conduct. Generally, however, where there are multiple responsible parties, a final
allocation of costs is made based on the amount and type of wastes disposed of by each party and the number of financially
viable parties, although this may not be the case with respect to any particular site. We have not been determined to be a major
contributor of wastes to any of these sites. On the basis of our relative contribution of waste to each site, we expect our share of
the ultimate liability for the various sites will not have a material adverse effect on our combined financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows in any given year.
Executive Officers of Registrant
For a listing of our executive officers, see Part III, Item 10 of this annual report.
7
***** Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Information *****
This annual report, including Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You should not place undue reliance on these statements. Statements that include
the words "expect," "intend," "plan," "believe," "project," "forecast," "estimate," "may," "should," "anticipate" and similar
statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties and include statements that
reflect the current views of our senior management with respect to our financial performance and future events with respect to
our business and industry in general. There are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in these statements. If one or more events related to these or other risks or uncertainties
materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may differ materially from what we
anticipate. Differences between actual results and any future performance suggested in our forward-looking statements could
result from a variety of factors, including the following: the highly competitive nature of our businesses; general economic and
business conditions, including changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates; general developments in the industries in
which we are involved; cancellations of and adjustments to backlog and the resulting impact from using backlog as an indicator
of future earnings; our ability to perform projects on time and on budget, in accordance with the schedules and terms
established by the applicable contracts with customers; changes in our effective tax rate and tax positions; our ability to
maintain operational support for our information systems against service outages and data corruption, as well as protection
against cyber-based network security breaches and theft of data; our ability to protect our intellectual property and renew
licenses to use intellectual property of third parties; our use of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting; our ability
to obtain and maintain surety bonds, letters of credit and similar financing; the risks associated with integrating businesses we
acquire; our ability to successfully manage research and development projects and costs, including our efforts to successfully
develop and commercialize new technologies and products; the operating risks normally incident to our lines of business,
including professional liability, product liability, warranty and other claims against us; changes in, or our failure or inability to
comply with, laws and government regulations; difficulties we may encounter in obtaining regulatory or other necessary
permits or approvals; changes in, and liabilities relating to, existing or future environmental regulatory matters; our limited
ability to influence and direct the operations of our joint ventures; potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; our
ability to successfully compete with current and future competitors; the loss of key personnel and the continued availability of
qualified personnel; our ability to negotiate and maintain good relationships with labor unions; changes in pension and medical
expenses associated with our retirement benefit programs; social, political, competitive and economic situations in foreign
countries where we do business or seek new business; the possibilities of war, other armed conflicts or terrorist attacks; and the
other risks set forth under Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" in this annual report.
These factors are not necessarily all the factors that could affect us. We assume no obligation to revise or update any
forward-looking statement included in this annual report for any reason, except as required by law.
Available Information
Our website address is www.babcock.com. We make available through the Investor Relations section of this website
under "SEC Filings," free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form
8-K, our proxy statement, statements of beneficial ownership of securities on Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments to those
reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those materials with, or furnish those materials to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's
Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information regarding the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains
reports, proxy and annual reports, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. We have also
posted on our website our: Corporate Governance Principles; Code of Business Conduct; Code of Ethics for our Chief
Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers; Board of Directors Conflicts of Interest Policies and Procedures;
Management, Board Members and Independent Director Contact Information; By-laws; and charters for the Audit & Finance,
Governance, Compensation and Safety & Security Committees of our Board.
8
Item 1A.
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider each of the following risks and all of the other information contained in this annual
report. Some of these risks relate principally to our spin-off from our former Parent, while others relate principally to our
business and the industry in which we operate or to the securities markets generally and ownership of our common stock. If
any of these risks develop into actual events, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be
materially adversely affected by any of these risks, and, as a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
Risks Relating to Our Industry and Our Business
We derive substantial revenues from electric power generating companies and other steam-using industries, with
demand for our products and services depending on spending in these historically cyclical industries. Additionally,
recent legislative and regulatory developments relating to clean air legislation are affecting industry plans for spending
on coal-fired power plants within the United States and elsewhere.
The demand for power generation products and services depends primarily on the spending of electric power
generating companies and other steam-using industries and expenditures by original equipment manufacturers. These
expenditures are influenced by such factors as:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
prices for electricity, along with the cost of production and distribution;
prices for natural resources such as coal and natural gas;
demand for electricity and other end products of steam-generating facilities;
availability of other sources of electricity or other end products;
requirements of environmental legislation and regulations, including potential requirements applicable to carbon
dioxide emissions;
impact of potential regional, state, national and/or global requirements to significantly limit or reduce
greenhouse gas emissions in the future;
level of capacity utilization and associated operations and maintenance expenditures of power generating
companies and other steam-using facilities;
requirements for maintenance and upkeep at operating power plants and other steam-using facilities to combat
the accumulated effects of wear and tear;
ability of electric generating companies and other steam users to raise capital; and
relative prices of fuels used in boilers, compared to prices for fuels used in gas turbines and other alternative
forms of generation.
We estimate that 50%, 57% and 64% of our consolidated revenues in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was related
to coal-fired power plants. A material decline in spending by electric power generating companies and other steam-using
industries over a sustained period of time could materially and adversely affect the demand for our power generation products
and services and, therefore, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Coal-fired power plants have been
scrutinized by environmental groups and government regulators over the emissions of potentially harmful pollutants. The
recent economic environment and uncertainty concerning new environmental legislation or replacement rules or regulations in
the United States and elsewhere has caused many of our major customers, principally electric utilities, to delay making
substantial expenditures for new plants, as well as upgrades to existing power plants.
9
Demand for our products and services is vulnerable to economic downturns and industry conditions.
Demand for our products and services has been, and we expect that demand will continue to be, subject to
significant fluctuations due to a variety of factors beyond our control, including economic and industry conditions. These
factors include, but are not limited to: the cyclical nature of our industry, inflation, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost
of credit, volatile oil and natural gas prices, low business and consumer confidence, high unemployment and energy
conservation measures.
Unfavorable economic conditions may lead customers to delay, curtail or cancel proposed or existing projects, which
may decrease the overall demand for our products and services and adversely affect our results of operations.
In addition, our customers may find it more difficult to raise capital in the future due to limitations on the availability
of credit, increases in interest rates and other factors affecting the federal, municipal and corporate credit markets. Also, our
customers may demand more favorable pricing terms and find it increasingly difficult to timely pay invoices for our products
and services, which would impact our future cash flows and liquidity. Inflation or significant changes in interest rates could
reduce the demand for our products and services. Any inability to timely collect our invoices may lead to an increase in our
accounts receivable and potentially to increased write-offs of uncollectible invoices. If the economy weakens, or customer
spending declines, then our backlog, revenues, net income and overall financial condition could deteriorate.
Our backlog is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and may not be a reliable indicator of future
revenues or earnings.
There can be no assurance that the revenues projected in our backlog will be realized or, if realized, will result in
profits. Because of project cancellations or changes in project scope and schedule, we cannot predict with certainty when or if
backlog will be performed. In addition, even where a project proceeds as scheduled, it is possible that contracted parties may
default and fail to pay amounts owed to us or poor project performance could increase the cost associated with a project.
Delays, suspensions, cancellations, payment defaults, scope changes and poor project execution could materially reduce or
eliminate the revenues and profits that we actually realize from projects in backlog.
Reductions in our backlog due to cancellation or modification by a customer or for other reasons may adversely
affect, potentially to a material extent, the revenues and earnings we actually receive from contracts included in our backlog.
Many of the contracts in our backlog provide for cancellation fees in the event customers cancel projects. These cancellation
fees usually provide for reimbursement of our out-of-pocket costs, revenues for work performed prior to cancellation and a
varying percentage of the profits we would have realized had the contract been completed. However, we typically have no
contractual right upon cancellation to the total revenues reflected in our backlog. Projects may remain in our backlog for
extended periods of time. If we experience significant project terminations, suspensions or scope adjustments to contracts
reflected in our backlog, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely impacted.
10
We are subject to risks associated with contractual pricing in our industry, including the risk that, if our actual costs
exceed the costs we estimate on our fixed-price contracts, our profitability will decline, and we may suffer losses.
We are engaged in a highly competitive industry, and we have priced a number of our projects on a fixed-price basis.
Our actual costs could exceed our projections. We attempt to cover the increased costs of anticipated changes in labor, material
and service costs of long-term contracts, either through estimates of cost increases, which are reflected in the original contract
price, or through price escalation clauses. Despite these attempts, however, the cost and gross profit we realize on a fixed-price
contract could vary materially from the estimated amounts because of supplier, contractor and subcontractor performance,
changes in job conditions, variations in labor and equipment productivity and increases in the cost of labor and raw materials,
particularly steel, over the term of the contract. These variations and the risks generally inherent in our industry may result in
actual revenues or costs being different from those we originally estimated and may result in reduced profitability or losses on
projects. Some of these risks include:
•
•
•
•
difficulties encountered on our large-scale projects related to the procurement of materials or due to schedule
disruptions, equipment performance failures, unforeseen site conditions, rejection clauses in customer contracts
or other factors that may result in additional costs to us, reductions in revenue, claims or disputes;
our inability to obtain compensation for additional work we perform or expenses we incur as a result of our
customers providing deficient design or engineering information or equipment or materials;
requirements to pay liquidated damages upon our failure to meet schedule or performance requirements of our
contracts; and
difficulties in engaging third-party subcontractors, equipment manufacturers or materials suppliers or failures by
third-party subcontractors, equipment manufacturers or materials suppliers to perform could result in project
delays and cause us to incur additional costs.
Our use of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting could result in volatility in our results of operations.
We generally recognize revenues and profits under our long-term contracts on a percentage-of-completion basis.
Accordingly, we review contract price and cost estimates regularly as the work progresses and reflect adjustments proportionate
to the percentage of completion in income in the period when we revise those estimates. To the extent these adjustments result
in a reduction or an elimination of previously reported profits with respect to a project, we would recognize a charge against
current earnings, which could be material. Our current estimates of our contract costs and the profitability of our long-term
projects, although reasonably reliable when made, could change as a result of the uncertainties associated with these types of
contracts, and if adjustments to overall contract costs are significant, the reductions or reversals of previously recorded revenue
and profits could be material in future periods.
If our co-venturers fail to perform their contractual obligations on a project or if we fail to coordinate effectively with
our co-venturers, we could be exposed to legal liability, loss of reputation and reduced profit on the project.
We often perform projects jointly with third parties. For example, we enter into contracting consortia and other
contractual arrangements to bid for and perform jointly on large projects. Success on these joint projects depends in part on
whether our co-venturers fulfill their contractual obligations satisfactorily. If any one or more of these third parties fail to
perform their contractual obligations satisfactorily, we may be required to make additional investments and provide added
services in order to compensate for that failure. If we are unable to adequately address any such performance issues, then our
customer may exercise its right to terminate a joint project, exposing us to legal liability, loss of reputation and reduced profit.
Our collaborative arrangements also involve risks that participating parties may disagree on business decisions and
strategies. These disagreements could result in delays, additional costs and risks of litigation. Our inability to successfully
maintain existing collaborative relationships or enter into new collaborative arrangements could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations.
11
Changes in our effective tax rate and tax positions may vary.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. A change in tax laws, treaties
or regulations, or their interpretation, in any country in which we operate could result in a higher tax rate on our earnings,
which could have a material impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations. In addition, significant judgment is
required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many
transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain, and we are regularly subject to audit by tax
authorities. Although we believe that our tax estimates and tax positions are reasonable, they could be materially affected by
many factors including the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation, the introduction of new tax accounting standards,
legislation, regulations and related interpretations, our global mix of earnings, the realizability of deferred tax assets and
changes in uncertain tax positions. A significant increase in our tax rate could have a material adverse effect on our profitability
and liquidity.
Our business could be negatively impacted by security threats, including physical and cybersecurity threats, and other
disruptions.
We face various security threats, including cyber threats, threats to the physical security of our facilities and
infrastructure, and threats from terrorist acts, as well as the potential for business disruptions associated with these threats.
Although we utilize a combination of tailored and industry standard security measures and technology to monitor and mitigate
these threats, we cannot guarantee that these measures and technology will be sufficient to prevent security threats from
materializing.
We are increasingly dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process,
transmit and store electronic and financial information, to manage and support a variety of business processes and activities and
to comply with regulatory, legal and tax requirements. We have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to cyber-based
attacks and other attempts to threaten our information technology systems. A cyber-based attack could include attempts to
gain unauthorized access to our proprietary information and attacks from malicious third parties using sophisticated, targeted
methods to circumvent firewalls, encryption and other security defenses, including hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of
deception. If any of our significant information technology systems suffer severe damage, disruption, or shutdown and our
business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, the services we provide to customers, the
value of our investment in research and development efforts and other intellectual property, our product sales, financial
condition, results of operations and stock price may be materially and adversely affected, and we could experience delays in
reporting our financial results. In addition, there is a risk of business interruption, litigation risks, and reputational damage from
leakage of confidential information. The costs related to cyber or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured
or indemnified by other means.
In order to address risks to our information systems, we continue to make investments in technologies and training of
Company personnel. From time to time we may replace and/or upgrade current financial, human resources and other
information technology systems. These activities subject us to inherent costs and risks associated with replacing and updating
these systems, including potential disruption of our internal control structure, substantial capital expenditures, demands on
management time and other risks of delays or difficulties in transitioning to new systems or of integrating new systems into our
current systems. Our systems implementations and upgrades may not result in productivity improvements at the levels
anticipated, or at all. In addition, the implementation of new technology systems may cause disruptions in our business
operations. Such disruption and any other information technology system disruptions, and our ability to mitigate those
disruptions, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations and stock price.
12
We rely on intellectual property law and confidentiality agreements to protect our intellectual property. We also rely on
intellectual property we license from third parties. Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights, or our inability
to obtain or renew licenses to use intellectual property of third parties, could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary information and other intellectual property. Our
intellectual property could be stolen, challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable. In addition, effective
intellectual property protection may be limited or unavailable in some foreign countries where we operate.
Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights may result in the loss of valuable technologies or adversely
affect our competitive business position. We rely significantly on proprietary technology, information, processes and know-how
that are not subject to patent or copyright protection. We seek to protect this information through trade secret or confidentiality
agreements with our employees, consultants, subcontractors or other parties, as well as through other security measures. These
agreements and security measures may be inadequate to deter or prevent misappropriation of our confidential information. In
the event of an infringement of our intellectual property rights, a breach of a confidentiality agreement or divulgence of
proprietary information, we may not have adequate legal remedies to protect our intellectual property. Litigation to determine
the scope of intellectual property rights, even if ultimately successful, could be costly and could divert management's attention
away from other aspects of our business. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently
developed by competitors.
In some instances, we have augmented our technology base by licensing the proprietary intellectual property of third
parties. In the future, we may not be able to obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, which could have a
material adverse effect on our operations.
Maintaining adequate bonding and letter of credit capacity is necessary for us to successfully bid on and win various
contracts.
In line with industry practice, we are often required to post standby letters of credit and surety bonds to support
contractual obligations to customers as well as other obligations. These letters of credit and bonds generally indemnify
customers should we fail to perform our obligations under the applicable contracts. If a letter of credit or bond is required for a
particular project and we are unable to obtain it due to insufficient liquidity or other reasons, we will not be able to pursue that
project. We utilize bonding facilities, but, as is typically the case, the issuance of bonds under each of those facilities is at the
surety's sole discretion. Moreover, due to events that affect the insurance and bonding and credit markets generally, bonding
and letters of credit may be more difficult to obtain in the future or may only be available at significant additional cost. There
can be no assurance that letters of credit or bonds will continue to be available to us on reasonable terms. Our inability to obtain
adequate letters of credit and bonding and, as a result, to bid on new work could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. As of December 31, 2015, we had $302.7 million in letters of credit and bank
guarantees and $541.7 million in surety bonds outstanding.
Our credit facility could restrict our operations.
The terms of our credit agreement impose various restrictions and covenants on us that could have adverse
consequences, including:
•
•
•
•
•
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or economic, regulatory and
industry conditions;
limiting our ability to invest in joint ventures or acquire other companies;
limiting our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders;
limiting our ability to repurchase shares of our common stock; and
limiting our ability to borrow additional funds.
13
Our business strategy includes acquisitions to support our growth. Acquisitions of other businesses can create risks and
uncertainties.
We intend to pursue growth through the acquisition of businesses or assets that we believe will enable us to
strengthen our existing businesses and expand into adjacent industries and regions. We may be unable to continue this growth
strategy if we cannot identify suitable businesses or assets, reach agreement on potential strategic acquisitions on acceptable
terms or for other reasons. If we are unable to complete acquisitions or to successfully integrate and develop acquired
businesses, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, we may incur asset impairment charges
related to acquisitions that reduce our profitability.
Business acquisitions involve risks, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
difficulties relating to the assimilation of personnel, services and systems of an acquired business and the
assimilation of marketing and other operational capabilities;
challenges resulting from unanticipated changes in customer relationships after the acquisition;
additional financial and accounting challenges and complexities in areas such as tax planning, treasury
management, financial reporting and internal controls;
assumption of liabilities of an acquired business, including liabilities that were unknown at the time the
acquisition transaction was negotiated;
diversion of management's attention from day-to-day operations;
failure to realize anticipated benefits, such as cost savings and revenue enhancements;
potentially substantial transaction costs associated with business combinations; and
potential impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets resulting from the overpayment for an acquisition.
Acquisitions may be funded by the issuance of additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on
attractive terms, or at all. Our ability to secure such financing will depend in part on prevailing capital market conditions, as
well as conditions in our business and operating results. Moreover, to the extent an acquisition transaction financed by non-
equity consideration results in goodwill, it will reduce our tangible net worth, which might have an adverse effect on potential
credit and bonding capacity.
Additionally, an acquisition may bring us into businesses we have not previously conducted and expose us to
additional business risks that are different than those we have historically experienced. Any of these factors could affect our
sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our business strategy includes development and commercialization of new technologies to support our growth, which
requires significant investment and involves various risks and uncertainties. These new technologies may not achieve
desired commercial or financial results.
Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to innovate by developing and commercializing
new product and service offerings. Investments in new technologies involve varying degrees of uncertainties and risk.
Commercial success depends on many factors, including the levels of innovation, the development costs and the availability of
capital resources to fund those costs, the levels of competition from others developing similar or other competing technologies,
our ability to obtain or maintain government permits or certifications, our ability to license or purchase new technologies from
third parties, the effectiveness of production, distribution and marketing efforts, and the costs to customers to deploy and
provide support for the new technologies. We may not achieve significant revenues from new product and service investments
for a number of years, if at all. Moreover, new products and services may not be profitable, and, even if they are profitable, our
operating margins from new products and services may not be as high as the margins we have experienced historically. In
addition, new technologies may not be patentable and, as a result, we may face increased competition.
14
Our operations are subject to operating risks, which could expose us to potentially significant professional liability,
product liability, warranty and other claims. Our insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover all of our significant
risks or our insurers may deny coverage of material losses we incur, which could adversely affect our profitability and
overall financial condition.
We engineer, construct and perform services in large industrial facilities where accidents or system failures can have
significant consequences. Risks inherent in our operations include:
•
•
•
•
accidents resulting in injury or the loss of life or property;
environmental or toxic tort claims, including delayed manifestation claims for personal injury or loss of life;
pollution or other environmental mishaps;
adverse weather conditions;
• mechanical failures;
•
•
•
property losses;
business interruption due to political action in foreign countries or other reasons; and
labor stoppages.
Any accident or failure at a site where we have provided products or services could result in significant professional
liability, product liability, warranty and other claims against us, regardless of whether our products or services caused the
incident. We have been, and in the future we may be, named as defendants in lawsuits asserting large claims as a result of
litigation arising from events such as those listed above.
We endeavor to identify and obtain in established markets insurance agreements to cover significant risks and
liabilities. Insurance against some of the risks inherent in our operations is either unavailable or available only at rates or on
terms that we consider uneconomical. Also, catastrophic events customarily result in decreased coverage limits, more limited
coverage, additional exclusions in coverage, increased premium costs and increased deductibles and self-insured retentions.
Risks that we have frequently found difficult to cost-effectively insure against include, but are not limited to, business
interruption, property losses from wind, flood and earthquake events, war and confiscation or seizure of property in some areas
of the world, pollution liability, liabilities related to occupational health exposures (including asbestos), professional
liability/errors and omissions coverage, the failure, misuse or unavailability of our information systems, the failure of security
measures designed to protect our information systems from security breaches, and liability related to risk of loss of our work in
progress and customer-owned materials in our care, custody and control. Depending on competitive conditions and other
factors, we endeavor to obtain contractual protection against uninsured risks from our customers. When obtained, such
contractual indemnification protection may not be as broad as we desire or may not be supported by adequate insurance
maintained by the customer. Such insurance or contractual indemnity protection may not be sufficient or effective under all
circumstances or against all hazards to which we may be subject. A successful claim for which we are not insured or for which
we are underinsured could have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally, disputes with insurance carriers over coverage
may affect the timing of cash flows and, if litigation with the carrier becomes necessary, an outcome unfavorable to us may
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary provides workers' compensation, employer's liability, commercial
general liability and automotive liability insurance to support our operations. We may also have business reasons in the future
to have our insurance subsidiary accept other risks which we cannot or do not wish to transfer to outside insurance companies.
These risks may be considerable in any given year or cumulatively. Our insurance subsidiary has not provided significant
amounts of insurance to unrelated parties. Claims as a result of our operations could adversely impact the ability of our
insurance subsidiary to respond to all claims presented.
15
Additionally, upon the February 22, 2006 effectiveness of the settlement relating to the Chapter 11 proceedings
involving several of our subsidiaries, most of our subsidiaries contributed substantial insurance rights to the asbestos personal
injury trust, including rights to (1) certain pre-1979 primary and excess insurance coverages and (2) certain of our 1979-1986
excess insurance coverage. These insurance rights provided coverage for, among other things, asbestos and other personal
injury claims, subject to the terms and conditions of the policies. The contribution of these insurance rights was made in
exchange for the agreement on the part of the representatives of the asbestos claimants, including the representative of future
claimants, to the entry of a permanent injunction, pursuant to Section 524(g) of the United States Bankruptcy Code, to channel
to the asbestos trust all asbestos-related claims against our subsidiaries and former subsidiaries arising out of, resulting from or
attributable to their operations, and the implementation of related releases and indemnification provisions protecting those
subsidiaries and their affiliates from future liability for such claims. Although we are not aware of any significant, unresolved
claims against our subsidiaries and former subsidiaries that are not subject to the channeling injunction and that relate to the
periods during which such excess insurance coverage related, with the contribution of these insurance rights to the asbestos
personal injury trust, it is possible that we could have underinsured or uninsured exposure for non-derivative asbestos claims or
other personal injury or other claims that would have been insured under these coverages had the insurance rights not been
contributed to the asbestos personal injury trust.
We are subject to government regulations that may adversely affect our future operations.
Many aspects of our operations and properties are affected by political developments and are subject to both
domestic and foreign governmental regulations, including those relating to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
constructing and manufacturing power generation products;
currency conversions and repatriation;
clean air and other environmental protection legislation;
taxation of foreign earnings;
transactions in or with foreign countries or officials; and
use of local employees and suppliers.
In addition, a substantial portion of the demand for our products and services is from electric power generating
companies and other steam-using customers. The demand for power generation products and services can be influenced by
governmental legislation setting requirements for utilities related to operations, emissions and environmental impacts. The
legislative process is unpredictable and includes a platform that continuously seeks to increase the restrictions on power
producers. Potential legislation limiting emissions from power plants, including carbon dioxide, could affect our markets and
the demand for our products and services related to power generation.
We cannot determine the extent to which our future operations and earnings may be affected by new legislation, new
regulations or changes in existing regulations.
Regulations related to conflict minerals may force us to incur additional expenses, may make our supply chain more
"
complex and may result in damage to our reputation with customers.
"
On August 22, 2012, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the "Dodd-
Frank Act"), the SEC adopted new requirements for companies that use minerals and metals, known as conflict minerals, in
their products, whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. Under these requirements, companies that are
subject to the rules conduct due diligence and disclose and report whether or not such minerals originate from the Democratic
Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. The implementation of these new requirements could adversely affect the sourcing,
availability and pricing of minerals used in the manufacture of components incorporated in our products. In addition, we will
incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of any of
the relevant minerals and metals used in our products. Since our supply chain is complex, we may not be able to sufficiently
16
verify the origins for these minerals and metals used in our products through the diligence procedures that we implement,
which may harm our reputation. In such event, we may also face difficulties in satisfying customers who require that the
components of our products either may not originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries or must
be certified as conflict free.
Our business and our customers' businesses are required to obtain, and to comply with, national, state and local
government permits and approvals.
Our business and our customers' businesses are required to obtain, and to comply with, national, state and local
government permits and approvals. Any of these permits or approvals may be subject to denial, revocation or modification
under various circumstances. Failure to obtain or comply with the conditions of permits or approvals may adversely affect our
operations by temporarily suspending our activities or curtailing our work and may subject us to penalties and other sanctions.
Although existing licenses are routinely renewed by various regulators, renewal could be denied or jeopardized by various
factors, including:
•
•
•
•
failure to comply with environmental and safety laws and regulations or permit conditions;
local community, political or other opposition;
executive action; and
legislative action.
In addition, if new environmental legislation or regulations are enacted or implemented, or existing laws or
regulations are amended or are interpreted or enforced differently, we or our customers may be required to obtain additional
operating permits or approvals. Our inability or our customers' inability to obtain, and to comply with, the permits and
approvals required for our business could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our operations are subject to various environmental laws and legislation that may become more stringent in the future.
Our operations and properties are subject to a wide variety of increasingly complex and stringent foreign, federal,
state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those governing discharges into the air and water, the handling
and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, the remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated by hazardous substances and
the health and safety of employees. Sanctions for noncompliance may include revocation of permits, corrective action orders,
administrative or civil penalties and criminal prosecution. Some environmental laws provide for strict, joint and several liability
for remediation of spills and other releases of hazardous substances, as well as damage to natural resources. In addition,
companies may be subject to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as a result of alleged exposure to hazardous
substances. Such laws and regulations may also expose us to liability for the conduct of or conditions caused by others or for
our acts that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time such acts were performed.
We cannot predict all of the environmental requirements or circumstances that will exist in the future but anticipate
that environmental control and protection standards will become increasingly stringent and costly. Based on our experience to
date, we do not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on our business or financial condition as a result of future
compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations. However, future events, such as changes in existing laws and
regulations or their interpretation, more vigorous enforcement policies of regulatory agencies or stricter or different
interpretations of existing laws and regulations, may require additional expenditures by us, which may be material.
Accordingly, we can provide no assurance that we will not incur significant environmental compliance costs in the future.
Our operations involve the handling, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials, and environmental laws and
regulations and civil liability for contamination of the environment or related personal injuries may result in increases
in our operating costs and capital expenditures and decreases in our earnings and cash flows.
Our operations involve the handling, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials. Failure to properly handle
these materials could pose a health risk to humans or wildlife and could cause personal injury and property damage (including
17
environmental contamination). If an accident were to occur, its severity could be significantly affected by the volume of the
materials and the speed of corrective action taken by emergency response personnel, as well as other factors beyond our
control, such as weather and wind conditions. Actions taken in response to an accident could result in significant costs.
Governmental requirements relating to the protection of the environment, including solid waste management, air
quality, water quality and cleanup of contaminated sites, have in the past had a substantial impact on our operations. These
requirements are complex and subject to frequent change. In some cases, they can impose liability for the entire cost of cleanup
on any responsible party without regard to negligence or fault and impose liability on us for the conduct of others or conditions
others have caused, or for our acts that complied with all applicable requirements when we performed them. Our compliance
with amended, new or more stringent requirements, stricter interpretations of existing requirements or the future discovery of
contamination may require us to make material expenditures or subject us to liabilities that we currently do not anticipate. Such
expenditures and liabilities may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In
addition, some of our operations and the operations of predecessor owners of some of our properties have exposed us to civil
claims by third parties for liability resulting from alleged contamination of the environment or personal injuries caused by
releases of hazardous substances into the environment.
In our contracts, we seek to protect ourselves from liability associated with accidents, but there can be no assurance
that such contractual limitations on liability will be effective in all cases or that our or our customers' insurance will cover all
the liabilities we have assumed under those contracts. The costs of defending against a claim arising out of a contamination
incident or precautionary evacuation, and any damages awarded as a result of such a claim, could adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
We maintain insurance coverage as part of our overall risk management strategy and due to requirements to maintain
specific coverage in our financing agreements and in many of our contracts. These policies do not protect us against all
liabilities associated with accidents or for unrelated claims. In addition, comparable insurance may not continue to be available
to us in the future at acceptable prices, or at all.
We could be adversely affected by violations of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA") generally prohibits companies and their intermediaries
from making improper payments to non-United States government officials. Our training program and policies mandate
compliance with the FCPA. We operate in some parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some
degree, and, in some circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. If
we are found to be liable for violations of the FCPA (either due to our own acts or our inadvertence, or due to the acts or
inadvertence of others, including employees of our joint ventures), we could suffer from civil and criminal penalties or other
sanctions.
We conduct a portion of our operations through joint venture entities, over which we may have limited ability to
influence.
We currently have equity interests in several significant joint ventures, which contributed $(0.2) million, $8.7 million
and $18.4 million to equity in income (loss) of investees for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively,
and may enter into additional joint venture arrangements in the future. Our influence over some of these entities may be
limited. Even in those joint ventures over which we do exercise significant influence, we are often required to consider the
interests of our joint venture partners in connection with major decisions concerning the operations of the joint ventures. In any
case, differences in views among the joint venture participants may result in delayed decisions or disputes. We also cannot
control the actions of our joint venture participants. We sometimes have joint and several liabilities with our joint venture
partners under the applicable contracts for joint venture projects and we cannot be certain that our partners will be able to
satisfy any potential liability that could arise. These factors could potentially harm the business and operations of a joint
venture and, in turn, our business and operations.
Operating through joint ventures in which we are minority holders results in us having limited control over many
decisions made with respect to business practices, projects and internal controls relating to projects. These joint ventures may
18
not be subject to the same requirements regarding internal controls and internal control over financial reporting that we follow.
As a result, internal control problems may arise with respect to the joint ventures that could adversely affect our ability to
respond to requests or contractual obligations to customers or to meet the internal control requirements to which we are
otherwise subject.
Our joint ventures located in countries outside of the United States are subject to various risks and uncertainties
associated with emerging markets, including bribery and corruption, changes in laws, rules and regulations, fluctuations in
demand, labor unrest, and the impact of regional and global business conditions generally. To the extent any of these factors
has a material adverse impact on the joint venture or its future operations, our investment may become impaired. With respect
to each joint venture, we, or our joint venture partner, may decide to change the strategic direction of the joint venture, which
could adversely affect its sales, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, our arrangements involving joint
ventures may restrict us from gaining access to the cash flows or assets of these entities. In some cases, our joint ventures have
governmentally imposed restrictions on their abilities to transfer funds to us. At December 31, 2015, our total investment in
joint ventures was $92.2 million, which included $14.9 million related to a joint venture in India and $61.0 million related to a
joint venture in China. In the third quarter of 2014, we issued a letter of credit with a four year term totaling approximately $10
million in support of a bank loan borrowed by TBWES. TBWES is an unconsolidated affiliate and the letter of credit can be
drawn if TBWES defaults on the loan.
We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors.
Some of our competitors or potential competitors have greater financial or other resources than we have and in some
cases are government supported. Our operations may be adversely affected if our current competitors or new market entrants
introduce new products or services with better features, performance, prices or other characteristics than those of our products
and services. Furthermore, we operate in industries where capital investment is critical. We may not be able to obtain as much
purchasing and borrowing leverage and access to capital for investment as other public companies, which may impair our
ability to compete against competitors or potential competitors.
The loss of the services of one or more of our key personnel, or our failure to attract, assimilate and retain trained
personnel in the future, could disrupt our operations and result in loss of revenues.
Our success depends on the continued active participation of our executive officers and key operating personnel. The
unexpected loss of the services of any one of these persons could adversely affect our operations.
Our operations require the services of employees having the technical training and experience necessary to obtain the
proper operational results. As such, our operations depend, to a considerable extent, on the continuing availability of such
personnel. If we should suffer any material loss of personnel to competitors, retirement or other reasons, or be unable to employ
additional or replacement personnel with the requisite level of training and experience to adequately operate our business, our
operations could be adversely affected. While we believe our wage rates are competitive and our relationships with our
employees are satisfactory, a significant increase in the wages paid by other employers could result in a reduction in our
workforce, increases in wage rates, or both. Additionally, we froze pension plan benefit accruals at the end of 2015, which
could also result in incremental turnover in our workforce. If any of these events occurred for a significant period of time, our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
Negotiations with labor unions and possible work stoppages and other labor problems could divert management's
attention and disrupt operations. In addition, new collective bargaining agreements or amendments to existing
agreements could increase our labor costs and operating expenses.
A significant number of our employees are members of labor unions. If we are unable to negotiate acceptable new
contracts with our unions from time to time, we could experience strikes or other work stoppages by the affected employees. If
any such strikes or other work stoppages were to occur, we could experience a significant disruption of operations. In addition,
negotiations with unions could divert management attention. New union contracts could result in increased operating costs, as a
result of higher wages or benefit expenses, for both union and nonunion employees. If nonunion employees were to unionize,
we would experience higher ongoing labor costs.
19
Pension and medical expenses associated with our retirement benefit plans may fluctuate significantly depending on a
number of factors, and we may be required to contribute cash to meet underfunded pension obligations.
A substantial portion of our current and retired employee population is covered by pension and postretirement benefit
plans, the costs and funding requirements of which depend on our various assumptions, including estimates of rates of return on
benefit-related assets, discount rates for future payment obligations, rates of future cost growth, mortality assumptions and
trends for future costs. Variances from these estimates could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, our policy to
recognize these variances annually through mark to market accounting could result in volatility in our results of operations,
which could be material. As of December 31, 2015, our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans were
underfunded by approximately $314.0 million. We also participate in various multi-employer pension plans in the United States
and Canada under union and industry agreements that generally provide defined benefits to employees covered by collective
bargaining agreements. Absent an applicable exemption, a contributor to a United States multi-employer plan is liable, upon
termination or withdrawal from a plan, for its proportionate share of the plan's underfunded vested liability. Funding
requirements for benefit obligations of these multi-employer pension plans are subject to certain regulatory requirements, and
we may be required to make cash contributions which may be material to one or more of these plans to satisfy certain
underfunded benefit obligations. See Note 8 to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8 in this
annual report for additional information regarding our pension and postretirement benefit plan obligations.
Our international operations are subject to political, economic and other uncertainties not generally encountered in our
domestic operations.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues and equity in income of investees from international operations, and
we intend to continue to expand our international operations and customer base as part of our growth strategy. Our revenues
derived from operations located outside of the United States represented approximately 41%, 37% and 35% of total revenues
for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Operating in international markets requires significant
resources and management attention and subjects us to political, economic and regulatory risks that are not generally
encountered in our United States operations. These include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
risks of war, terrorism and civil unrest;
expropriation, confiscation or nationalization of our assets;
renegotiation or nullification of our existing contracts;
changing political conditions and changing laws and policies affecting trade and investment;
overlap of different tax structures; and
risk of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Various foreign jurisdictions have laws limiting the right and ability of foreign subsidiaries and joint ventures to pay
dividends and remit earnings to affiliated companies. Our international operations sometimes face the additional risks of
fluctuating currency values, hard currency shortages and controls of foreign currency exchange. If we continue to expand our
business globally, our success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks.
These and other factors may have a material impact on our international operations or our business as a whole.
Natural disasters or other events beyond our control could adversely impact our business.
Natural disasters, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, or other events could adversely
impact demand for or supply of our products. In addition, natural disasters could also cause disruption to our facilities, systems
or projects, which could interrupt operational processes and performance on our contracts and adversely impact our ability to
manufacture our products and provide services and support to our customers. We operate facilities in areas of the world that are
exposed to natural disasters, such as, but not limited to, hurricanes, floods and tornadoes.
20
War, other armed conflicts or terrorist attacks could have a material adverse effect on our business.
War, terrorist attacks and unrest have caused and may continue to cause instability in the world's financial and
commercial markets and have significantly increased political and economic instability in some of the geographic areas in
which we operate. Threats of war or other armed conflict may cause further disruption to financial and commercial markets. In
addition, continued unrest could lead to acts of terrorism in the United States or elsewhere, and acts of terrorism could be
directed against companies such as ours. Also, acts of terrorism and threats of armed conflicts in or around various areas in
which we operate could limit or disrupt our markets and operations, including disruptions from evacuation of personnel,
cancellation of contracts or the loss of personnel or assets. Armed conflicts, terrorism and their effects on us or our markets
may significantly affect our business and results of operations in the future.
Risks Relating to our 2015 Spin-Off from our Former Parent
We may be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve from our separation from BWC.
As an independent public company, we believe that we are able to more effectively focus on our operations and
growth strategies than we could as a segment of BWC prior to the spin-off. However, following our separation from BWC in
the spin-off, there is a risk that our results of operations and cash flows may be susceptible to greater volatility due to
fluctuations in our business levels and other factors that may adversely affect our operating and financial performance. In
addition, as a segment of BWC, we previously benefitted from BWC's financial resources. Because BWC's other operations
will no longer be available to offset any volatility in our results of operations and cash flows and BWC's financial and other
resources will no longer be available to us, we may not be able to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve
as an independent public company.
Our historical audited consolidated and combined financial information is not necessarily indicative of our future
financial condition, future results of operations or future cash flows nor does it reflect what our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows would have been as an independent public company during the periods presented.
The historical audited consolidated and combined financial information included in this annual report for periods
prior to July 1, 2015 does not necessarily reflect what our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows would have
been as an independent public company during such periods and is not necessarily indicative of our future financial condition,
future results of operations or future cash flows. This is primarily a result of the following factors:
•
•
•
•
the historical audited consolidated and combined financial results reflect allocations of expenses for services
historically provided by BWC, and those allocations may be different than the comparable expenses we would
have incurred as an independent company;
our cost of debt and other capitalization may be different from that reflected in our historical audited
consolidated and combined financial statements;
the historical audited consolidated and combined financial information does not reflect the changes that will
occur in our cost structure, management, financing arrangements and business operations as a result of our
separation from BWC, including the costs related to being an independent company; and
the historical audited consolidated and combined financial information does not reflect the effects of some of
the liabilities that have been assumed by B&W and does reflect the effects of some of the assets that have been
transferred to, and liabilities that have been assumed by, BWC, including the assets and liabilities associated
with BWC's Nuclear Energy segment, which were previously part of B&W and were transferred to BWC prior
to the spin-off.
Please refer to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included
in Part II, Item 7, and the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8 of this annual report.
21
We have no history operating as an independent public company, we may encounter difficulties in making the changes
necessary to operate as an independent public company, and we may incur greater costs as an independent public
company.
We have historically used BWC's infrastructure to support our business functions, including the following functions:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
accounting and financial reporting;
information technology and communications;
legal;
human resources and employee benefits;
procurement and supply chain management;
tax administration; and
treasury and corporate finance.
As a result of the June 30, 2015 spin-off, we no longer have access to BWC's infrastructure, and have established our
own business functions. However, we currently pay BWC for certain services on a cost-allocation basis. BWC continues to
provide some of these services to us on a transitional basis, pursuant to transition services agreements we entered into with
BWC. At the end of this transition period, which will be no longer than 18 months, we will need to perform these services
ourselves or hire third parties to perform these services on our behalf. The costs associated with performing or outsourcing
these services may exceed those charged by BWC when we were part of BWC or during the transition period. A significant
increase in the costs of performing or outsourcing these services could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
Our accounting and other management systems and resources may not be adequately prepared to meet the financial
reporting and other requirements to which we are subject following the spin-off and may strain our resources.
Our financial results were included within the consolidated results of BWC, and we believe that our reporting and
control systems are appropriate for a public company. However, prior to the spin-off, we were not directly subject to reporting
and other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). As a result of the spin-off, we are directly
subject to reporting and other obligations under the Exchange Act, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002. These reporting and other obligations place significant demands on our management and administrative and
operational resources, including accounting resources.
To comply with these requirements, we are in the process of upgrading our information technology and reporting
systems and procedures, implementing additional financial and management controls, and hiring additional accounting and
finance staff. We expect to incur additional annual expenses related to these steps, and those expenses may be significant. If we
are unable to upgrade our financial and management controls, reporting systems, information technology and procedures in a
timely and effective fashion, our ability to comply with our financial reporting requirements and other rules that apply to
reporting companies under the Exchange Act could be impaired. Any failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls
could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are subject to continuing contingent liabilities of BWC following the spin-off.
As a result of the spin-off, there are several significant areas where the liabilities of BWC may become our
obligations. For example, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") and the related rules and
regulations, each corporation that was a member of BWC consolidated tax reporting group during any taxable period or portion
of any taxable period ending on or before the completion of the spin-off is jointly and severally liable for the federal income tax
liability of the entire consolidated tax reporting group for that taxable period. We entered into a tax sharing agreement with
BWC in connection with the spin-off that allocates the responsibility for prior period taxes of BWC consolidated tax reporting
22
group between us and BWC and its subsidiaries. However, if BWC were unable to pay, we could be required to pay the entire
amount of such taxes. Other provisions of law establish similar liability for other matters, including laws governing tax-
qualified pension plans as well as other contingent liabilities. The other contingent liabilities include personal injury claims or
environmental liabilities related to BWC's historical nuclear operations. For example, BWC has agreed to indemnify us for
personal injury claims and environmental liabilities associated with radioactive materials related to the operation, remediation,
and/or decommissioning of two former nuclear fuel processing facilities located in the Borough of Apollo and Parks Township,
Pennsylvania. To the extent insurance providers and third party indemnitors do not cover those liabilities, and BWC was unable
to pay, we could be required to pay for them.
The spin-off could result in substantial tax liability.
The spin-off was conditioned on BWC's receipt of an opinion of counsel, in form and substance satisfactory to BWC,
substantially to the effect that, for United States federal income tax purposes, the spin-off qualifies under Section 355 of the
Code, and certain transactions related to the spin-off qualify under Sections 355 and/or 368 of the Code. The opinion relied on,
among other things, various assumptions and representations as to factual matters made by BWC and us which, if inaccurate or
incomplete in any material respect, would jeopardize the conclusions reached by such counsel in its opinion. The opinion is not
binding on the United States Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") or the courts, and there can be no assurance that the IRS or the
courts will not challenge the conclusions stated in the opinion or that any such challenge would not prevail.
We are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would cause the assumptions or representations that were relied
on in the opinion to be inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect. If, notwithstanding receipt of the opinion, the spin-off
were determined not to qualify under Section 355 of the Code, each United States holder of BWC common stock who received
shares of our common stock in the spin-off would generally be treated as receiving a taxable distribution of property in an
amount equal to the fair market value of the shares of our common stock received. In addition, if certain related preparatory
transactions were to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment, they would be treated as taxable asset sales and/or distributions.
Under the terms of the tax sharing agreement we entered into in connection with the spin-off, we and BWC generally
share responsibility for any taxes imposed on us or BWC and its subsidiaries in the event that the spin-off and/or certain related
preparatory transactions were to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment. However, if the spin-off and/or certain related preparatory
transactions were to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment because of actions or failures to act by us or BWC, we or BWC,
respectively, would be responsible for all such taxes. If we are liable for taxes under the tax sharing agreement, that liability
could have a material adverse effect on us.
Potential liabilities associated with obligations under the tax sharing agreement cannot be precisely quantified at this
time.
Under the terms of the tax sharing agreement we entered into in connection with the spin-off, we are generally
responsible for all taxes attributable to us or any of our subsidiaries, whether accruing before, on or after the date of the spin-
off. We and BWC generally share responsibility for all taxes imposed on us or BWC and its subsidiaries in the event the spin-
off and/or certain related preparatory transactions were to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment. However, if the spin-off and/or
certain related preparatory transactions were to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment because of actions or failures to act by us or
BWC, we or BWC, respectively would be responsible for all such taxes. Our liabilities under the tax sharing agreement could
have a material adverse effect on us. At this time, we cannot precisely quantify the amount of liabilities we may have under the
tax sharing agreement and there can be no assurances as to their final amounts.
Under some circumstances, we could be liable for any resulting adverse tax consequences from engaging in significant
strategic or capital raising transactions.
Even if the spin-off otherwise qualifies as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Code, the spin-off and
certain related transactions may result in significant United States federal income tax liabilities to us under Section 355(e) and
other applicable provisions of the Code if 50% or more of BWC's stock or our stock (in each case, by vote or value) is treated
as having been acquired, directly or indirectly, by one or more persons as part of a plan (or series of related transactions) that
includes the spin-off. Any acquisitions of BWC stock or our stock (or similar acquisitions), or any understanding, arrangement
23
or substantial negotiations regarding such an acquisition of BWC stock or our stock (or similar acquisitions), within two years
before or after the spin-off are subject to special scrutiny. The process for determining whether an acquisition triggering those
provisions has occurred is complex, inherently factual and subject to interpretation of the facts and circumstances of a
particular case.
Under the terms of the tax sharing agreement we entered into in connection with the spin-off, BWC generally is
liable for any such tax liabilities. However, we are required to indemnify BWC against any such tax liabilities that result from
actions taken or failures to act by us. As a result of these rules and contractual provisions, we may be unable, within the two
year period following the spin, to engage in strategic or capital raising transactions that our stockholders might consider
favorable, or to structure potential transactions in the manner most favorable to us, without certain adverse tax consequences.
Potential indemnification liabilities to BWC pursuant to the master separation agreement could materially adversely
affect B&W.
The master separation agreement with BWC provides for, among other things, the principal corporate transactions
required to effect the spin-off, certain conditions to the spin-off and provisions governing the relationship between B&W and
BWC with respect to and resulting from the spin-off. Among other things, the master separation agreement provides for
indemnification obligations designed to make B&W financially responsible for substantially all liabilities that may exist
relating to our business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the spin-off, as well as those obligations of BWC assumed
by us pursuant to the master separation agreement. If we are required to indemnify BWC under the circumstances set forth in
the master separation agreement, we may be subject to substantial liabilities.
In connection with our separation from BWC, BWC has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities. However, there
can be no assurance that the indemnity will be sufficient to insure us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that
BWC's ability to satisfy its indemnification obligation will not be impaired in the future.
Pursuant to the master separation agreement, BWC has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities. However, third
parties could seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that BWC agreed to retain, and there can be no assurance that
the indemnity from BWC will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that BWC will be able to
fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from BWC any amounts for
which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses.
Several members of our board and management may have conflicts of interest because of their ownership of shares of
common stock of BWC (now known as BWX Technologies, Inc).
Several members of our board and management own shares of common stock of BWC and/or options to purchase
common stock of BWC because of their current or prior relationships with BWC. In addition, five of the current members of
our board of directors were members of the BWC board of directors. This share ownership by these five directors could create,
or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when our directors and executive officers are faced with decisions that could
have different implications for B&W and BWC.
Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock
As a new public company, the market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly in future periods due to a number of factors,
many of which are beyond our control, including:
•
•
fluctuations in our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in our industry;
failures of our operating results to meet the estimates of securities analysts or the expectations of our
stockholders or changes by securities analysts in their estimates of our future earnings;
•
announcements by us or our customers, suppliers or competitors;
24
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the depth and liquidity of the market for B&W common stock;
changes in laws or regulations that adversely affect our industry or us;
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;
general economic, industry and stock market conditions;
future sales of our common stock by our stockholders;
future issuances of our common stock by us;
our ability to pay dividends in the future; and
the other factors described in these "Risk Factors" and other parts of this annual report.
Substantial sales of our common stock could cause our stock price to decline and issuances by us may dilute our
common stockholders' ownership in B&W.
As of December 31, 2015, we have an aggregate of approximately 53.5 million shares of common stock outstanding.
Any sales of substantial amounts of our common stock could lower the market price of our common stock and impede our
ability to raise capital through the issuance of equity securities. Further, if we were to issue additional equity securities to raise
additional capital, our stockholders' ownership interests in B&W will be diluted and the value of our common stock may be
reduced.
We do not currently pay regular dividends on our common stock, so holders of our common stock may not receive funds
without selling their shares of our common stock.
We have no current intent to pay a regular dividend. Our board of directors will determine the payment of future
dividends on our common stock, if any, and the amount of any dividends in light of applicable law, contractual restrictions
limiting our ability to pay dividends, our earnings and cash flows, our capital requirements, our financial condition, and other
factors our board of directors deems relevant. Accordingly, our stockholders may have to sell some or all of their shares of our
common stock in order to generate cash flow from their investment.
Provisions in our corporate documents and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control of B&W, even if
that change may be considered beneficial by some stockholders.
The existence of some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law could discourage,
delay or prevent a change in control of B&W that a stockholder may consider favorable.
In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which may have an anti-
takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance by our board of directors, including discouraging takeover
attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for shares of our common stock.
We believe these provisions protect our stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring
potential acquirors to negotiate with our board of directors and by providing our board of directors with more time to assess any
acquisition proposal, and are not intended to make B&W immune from takeovers. However, these provisions apply even if the
offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our board of directors
determines is not in the best interests of B&W and our stockholders.
We may issue preferred stock that could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue, without the approval of our stockholders, one or more classes
or series of preferred stock having such designation, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special
rights, including preferences over our common stock respecting dividends and distributions, as our board of directors generally
may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could dilute the voting power or reduce the value
25
of our common stock. For example, we could grant holders of preferred stock the right to elect some number of our directors in
all events or on the happening of specified events or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or
redemption rights or liquidation preferences we could assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the
common stock.
Item 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 2.
PROPERTIES
The following table provides the segment name, location and general use of each of our principal properties at
December 31, 2015 that we own or lease.
Business Segment and Location
Principal Use
Global Power / Global Services
Barberton, Ohio
West Point, Mississippi(2)
Lancaster, Ohio
Copley, Ohio
Esbjerg, Denmark
Dumbarton, Scotland
Straubing, Germany
Guadalupe, NL, Mexico
Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Jingshan, Hubei, China
Ebensburg, Pennsylvania
Industrial Environmental
De Pere, Wisconsin
Shanghai, China
Corporate
Administrative office / research and development
Manufacturing facility
Manufacturing facility
Warehouse / service center
Manufacturing facility / administrative office
Manufacturing facility
Manufacturing facility
Manufacturing facility
Administrative office / warehouse
Manufacturing facility
Power generation
Manufacturing facility / administrative office
Manufacturing facility
Owned/Leased
(Lease Expiration)
Owned(1)
Owned(1)
Owned(1)
Owned(1)
Owned
Owned
Leased (2021)
Leased (2024)
Leased (2018)
Owned
Owned(1)
Owned(1)
Owned
Charlotte, North Carolina
Administrative office
Leased (2019)
(1) These properties are encumbered by liens under existing credit facilities.
(2) Scheduled for closure during 2016.
We believe that our major properties are adequate for our present needs and, as supplemented by planned
improvements and construction, expect them to remain adequate for the foreseeable future.
Item 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth under the heading "Investigations and Litigation" in Note 11 to our consolidated and
combined financial statements included in Item 8 is incorporated by reference into this Item 3.
26
Item 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
We own, manage and operate Ebensburg Power Company, an independent power company that produces alternative
electrical energy. Through one of our subsidiaries, Revloc Reclamation Service, Inc., Ebensburg Power Company operates
multiple coal refuse sites in Western Pennsylvania (collectively, the "Revloc Sites"). At the Revloc Sites, Ebensburg Power
Company utilizes coal refuse from abandoned surface mine lands to produce energy. Beyond converting the coal refuse to
energy, Ebensburg Power Company is also taking steps to reclaim the former surface mine lands to make the land and streams
more attractive for wildlife and human uses.
The Revloc Sites are subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration under the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by
Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and this Item is included in
exhibit 95 to this annual report.
27
PART II
Item 5.
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BW. High and low common stock
prices by quarter in the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2015
Quarter ended
June 30, 2015
September 30, 2015
December 31, 2015
Share Price
Dividends
High
Low
Per Share
$
$
$
22.31 $
21.95 $
21.67 $
17.12 $
16.40 $
15.86 $
—
—
—
As of January 31, 2016, there were approximately 1,958 record holders of our common stock.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Total
number
of shares
purchased(1)
Average
price paid
per share
84,071 $
565,248 $
600,498 $
1,249,817
16.69
17.22
19.78
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
Approximate dollar
value of shares that
may yet be purchased
under the plans
or programs
(in thousands) (2)
84,071 $
562,604 $
600,498 $
1,247,173
97,324
87,638
75,761
Period
October 1, 2015 - October 31, 2015
November 1, 2015 - November 30, 2015
December 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015
Total
(1) Includes 2,644 shares repurchased during November pursuant to the provisions of employee benefit plans that permit the
repurchase of shares to satisfy statutory tax withholding obligations.
(2) On August 4, 2015, we announced that our board of directors authorized us to repurchase an indeterminate number of
shares of our common stock in the open market at an aggregate market value of up to $100 million during a two-year
period ending June 8, 2017.
28
The following graph provides a comparison of our cumulative total shareholder return through December 31, 2015 to
the return of the S&P 500 and our custom peer group.
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
S&P 500
Custom Peer Group
e
u
l
a
v
x
e
d
n
I
125
100
75
50
6/30/2015
9/30/2015
Period ending
12/31/2015
(1) Assumes initial investment of $100 on June 30, 2015.
The peer group used for the six-month comparison beginning with June 30, 2015 is comprised of the following companies:
Actuant Corp.
AMETEK Inc.
Crane Co.
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
Itron Inc.
MasTec Inc.
CECO Environmental Corp. Dycom Industries Inc.
Primoris Services Corp.
Chart Industries Inc.
Flowserve Corp.
SPX Corp.
CIRCOR Int. Inc.
Harsco Corp.
Covanta Holding Corp.
Idex Corp.
29
Item 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except for per share amounts)
For the Years Ended
Revenues
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
Net income attributable to Babcock &
Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
Basic earnings per common share:
Income (loss) from continuing
operations per common share
Net income attributable to Babcock &
Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
Total assets (as of year-end)
$
$
$
$
$
$
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
1,757,295 $
1,486,029 $
1,767,651 $
1,992,899 $
1,532,134
16,534 $
(11,890) $
140,478 $
128,809 $
19,983
19,141 $
(26,528) $
174,527 $
140,753 $
58,733
0.31 $
(0.23) $
2.51 $
2.17 $
0.34
0.36 $
(0.49) $
3.12 $
1.97 $
(0.32)
1,663,045 $
1,516,554 $
1,290,228 $
1,413,420 $
1,648,305
We purchased MEGTEC on June 20, 2014. MEGTEC, which comprises our Industrial Environmental operating
segment generated revenues of $183.7 million and $105.4 million and gross profit of $48.9 million and $25.0 million in the
years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
We recognize actuarial gains (losses) related to our pension and postretirement benefit plans in earnings in the fourth
quarter each year as a component of net periodic benefit cost. The effect of these adjustments for 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and
2011 on pre-tax income was a gain (loss) of $(40.2) million, $(101.3) million, $92.1 million, $(8.4) million and $(105.9)
million, respectively.
In each of the past four years, we recognized contract losses for additional estimated costs to complete our Global
Power segment's Berlin Station project. This project experienced unforeseen worksite conditions and fuel specification issues
that caused schedule delays, resulting in us filing suit against the customer in January 2014. The dispute was settled during the
third quarter of 2015. The contract losses reduced pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations by $9.6 million, $11.6
million, $35.6 million and $16.9 million in 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Restructuring and spin-off transaction costs were $14.9 million, $20.2 million and $18.3 million in 2015, 2014 and
2013, respectively. Subsequent to the June 30, 2015 spin-off transaction, we incurred $8.5 million of incremental stand-alone
costs to operate our business as an independent public entity. These stand-alone costs, included in selling, general and
administrative expenses on our consolidated and combined statements of operations, include expenses associated with legal
matters, accounting, information technology, compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, insurance and other corporate
governance matters.
In the year ended December 31, 2015, we also recognized a $14.6 million impairment charge, primarily related to
research and development facilities and equipment dedicated to a carbon capture process that was determined to not be
commercially viable and other equipment primarily related to pilot testing capabilities that are no longer viable for current or
future research and development efforts.
30
Item 7.
OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OVERVIEW
In this annual report, unless the context otherwise indicates, "B&W," "we," "us" and "our" mean Babcock & Wilcox
Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Spin-Off Transaction: On June 8, 2015, the board of directors of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (now known as
BWX Technologies, Inc.) ("BWC" or the "former Parent") approved the spin-off of B&W through the distribution of shares of
B&W common stock to holders of BWC common stock. The distribution of B&W common stock was made on June 30, 2015,
and consisted of one share of B&W common stock for every two shares of BWC common stock to holders of BWC common
stock as of 5:00 p.m. New York City time on the record date, June 18, 2015. Cash was paid in lieu of any fractional shares of
B&W common stock. On June 30, 2015, B&W became a separate publicly traded company, and BWC did not retain any
ownership interest in B&W. We filed our Form 10 describing the spin-off with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which
was declared effective on June 16, 2015. The spin-off is further described in Note 1 to the consolidated and combined financial
statements included in Item 8 of this annual report.
Executive Summary of Results: In 2015, our revenues, gross profit and operating income all increased compared to
2014. The increase in revenues and gross profit is primarily attributable the increase in projects awarded to our Global Power
segment and to a full year of the MEGTEC business, which we acquired on June 20, 2014. Our results also benefited from cost
savings from our restructuring initiatives and research and development activities, partially offset by increases in selling,
general and administrative costs that were mainly driven by the incremental costs of being a stand-alone public company and
the inclusion of a full year of our MEGTEC business.
The following items also have a meaningful effect on our results of operations:
• Mark to market ("MTM") adjustments for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans were gains (losses)
of $(40.2) million, $(101.3) million and $92.1 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These gains and
losses are based on actual plan asset returns and changes in assumptions in the measurement of the related
benefit plan liabilities, which are more fully described in Note 8 to the consolidated and combined financial
statements included in Item 8.
•
•
•
•
•
Restructuring costs totaled $11.7 million, $20.2 million and $18.3 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively,
for a number of both completed and ongoing initiatives designed to phase in savings and make our products
more competitive. Restructuring costs include accelerated depreciation and other activities related to
manufacturing facility consolidation and outsourcing as well as reductions in force, consulting and other costs. In
addition to savings already realized, we expect to realize savings of approximately $15 million in 2016 and an
additional $15 million in 2017. The expected costs to achieve these savings are more fully described below.
Asset impairments totaling $14.6 million were recognized in 2015 related to research and development facilities
and equipment dedicated to a carbon capture process that was determined not to be commercially viable and
other equipment primarily related to pilot testing capabilities that are no longer viable for current or future
research and development efforts.
Litigation settlement charges of $9.6 million were incurred in 2015, including $1.8 million of legal costs and a
$7.8 million reversal of Global Power segment revenue associated with the release of an accrued claims
receivable as part of the Berlin Station project legal settlement.
Spin-off transaction costs were $3.3 million in 2015, primarily related to retention stock awards that had a one-
year vesting period.
Selling, general and administrative costs ("SG&A") include the incremental costs of being a separate stand-alone
public company, such as costs to create separate accounting, legal, senior management and tax teams. We
31
estimate that we will incur annual incremental costs of $14 million to $16 million, of which we incurred
approximately $8.5 million in the second half of 2015. Due to the scope and complexity of these activities, the
amount and timing of these incremental costs could vary and initial run rates could be slightly higher than the
expected annual increase. Prior to the spin, we received allocations from BWC that were included in our SG&A.
These pre-spin allocations also included $2.7 million, $5.3 million and $9.8 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013
related to the Nuclear Energy segment that was transferred to BWC at the time of the spin-off. The Nuclear
Energy segment is treated as discontinued operations in our financial statements, but these related cost
allocations remain in the selling, general and administrative costs of our continuing operations.
Our segment and other operating results are described in more detail below.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated and Combined Results of Operations
(In thousands)
REVENUES
Global Power
Global Services
Industrial Environmental(1)
GROSS PROFIT
Global Power
Global Services
Industrial Environmental(1)
Mark to market adjustment included in cost of operations
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
639,970 $
471,929 $
712,461
933,630
183,695
908,682
105,418
1,055,190
—
$
1,757,295 $
1,486,029 $
1,767,651
$
$
$
111,309 $
94,647 $
192,241
48,914
193,629
24,961
126,275
225,434
—
(44,307) $
(94,204) $
84,772
308,157 $
219,033 $
436,481
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(244,065)
(218,038)
(211,401)
Mark to market adjustment included in selling, general and
administrative expenses
Research and development costs
Losses on asset disposal and impairments, net
Equity in income (loss) of investees
Restructuring and spin-off transaction costs
4,097
(16,543)
(14,597)
(242)
(14,946)
(7,233)
(18,483)
(1,752)
8,681
(20,183)
7,331
(21,043)
(1,181)
18,387
(18,343)
Total operating income (loss)
$
21,861 $
(37,975) $
210,231
(1) Our Industrial Environmental segment is composed of our MEGTEC business, which was acquired on June 20, 2014 as
described in Note 3 to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8. Results of the Industrial
Environmental segment in 2014 include only a partial period.
2015 vs 2014 Consolidated and Combined Results: Revenues increased 18.3%, or $271.3 million, to $1.76 billion
in 2015 compared to $1.49 billion in 2014 due to increases in revenues from our Global Power, Global Services and Industrial
Environmental segments of $168.0 million, $24.9 million and $78.3 million, respectively. The MEGTEC acquisition, which
was completed on June 20, 2014, contributed $183.7 million of revenues in 2015 compared to $105.4 million in 2014.
Gross profit increased $89.1 million to $308.2 million in 2015 from $219.0 million in 2014. Excluding the MTM
charges shown above, gross profit increased $39.2 million to $352.5 million in 2015 from $313.2 million in 2014 primarily due
32
to the inclusion of our MEGTEC business for a full year and increases in the volume of utility, industrial and renewable energy
boiler projects in our Global Power segment.
Operating income increased $59.8 million to $21.9 million in 2015 from an operating loss of $38.0 million in 2014.
Operating income includes significant charges for MTM, restructuring and spin-off transaction costs and asset impairments that
are each illustrated above and described in more detail below. Excluding these items, 2015 operating income would have
increased $6.2 million from 2014 primarily from the gross margin improvements described above partially offset by increases
in selling, general and administrative increases from inclusion of a full year of our MEGTEC business and the incremental
stand-alone costs to operate our business as an independent public entity since the spin-off. Operating income in 2015 also
decreased due to a $8.9 million decrease in equity in income of investees described below.
The performance drivers of each segment as well as other operating costs are discussed in more detail below.
2014 vs 2013 Consolidated and Combined Results: Revenues decreased 15.9%, or $281.6 million, to $1.49 billion
in 2014 compared to $1.77 billion in 2013 due primarily to decreases in revenues from our Global Power and Global Services
segments of $240.5 million and $146.5 million, respectively, partially offset the June 20, 2014 acquisition of MEGTEC, which
contributed revenues of $105.4 million in our Industrial Environmental segment.
Gross profit decreased $217.4 million to $219.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 from $436.5 million in
2013. Excluding the MTM charges shown above, gross profit decreased $38.5 million to $313.2 million in 2014 from $351.7
million in 2013 primarily due the revenue decreases from our Global Power and Global Services segments, partially offset by
the June 20, 2014 acquisition of of MEGTEC, which comprises our Industrial Environmental segment. This decline was
partially offset due to a lower loss provision of $11.6 million on the Berlin Station project in 2014 as compared to a loss
provision of $35.6 million 2013. The Berlin Station project was completed in 2014.
Operating income (loss) decreased $248.2 million to a loss of $38.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2014
compared to operating income of $210.2 million in 2013. Operating income includes significant charges for MTM,
restructuring and spin-off transaction costs and asset impairments that are each illustrated above and described in more detail
below. Excluding these items, 2014 operating income would have decreased $52.3 million from 2013 primarily from the gross
margin decreases described above and from a $9.7 million decrease in equity in income of investees described below.
Segment Descriptions and Results
We operate in three segments: Global Power, Global Services and Industrial Environmental.
Global Power Segment Description
Our Global Power segment consists of our worldwide new build boiler and environmental products businesses.
Through this segment, we engineer, manufacture, procure, construct and commission steam generating and environmental
systems and other related equipment. Our boilers are designed for utility and industrial applications, fired with fossil and
renewable fuels and include advanced supercritical boilers, subcritical boilers, fluidized bed boilers, biomass-fired boilers,
waste-to-energy boilers, chemical recovery boilers, industrial power boilers, package boilers, heat recovery steam generators
and waste heat boilers. Our utility-scale environmental systems offer air pollution control products and related equipment for
the treatment of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, fine particulate, mercury, acid gases and other hazardous air emissions and
include wet and dry flue gas desulfurization systems, catalytic and non-catalytic nitrogen oxides reduction systems, low
nitrogen oxides burners and overfire air systems, fabric filter baghouses, wet and dry electrostatic precipitators, mercury control
systems and dry sorbent injection for acid gas mitigation. Our customers consist of a wide range of utilities, independent power
producers and industrial companies globally. This segment's activity is dependent on the capital expenditures and operations
and maintenance expenditures of global electric power generating companies and other steam-using industries with
environmental compliance needs, as well as electric load growth and renewable incentives in various countries around the
world.
33
We see opportunities for growth in revenues in this segment relating to a variety of factors including the following:
•
•
•
•
emerging
environmental systems;
international markets needing state-of-the-art
technology for fossil power generation and
a global need for renewable and carbon neutral power applications requiring steam generation and environmental
control technologies to enable beneficial use of municipal waste and biomass;
industrial products such as heat recovery and steam generators, and natural gas and oil fired package boilers due
to lower fuel prices; and
increasing environmental regulation.
Globally, efforts to reduce the environmental impact of burning fossil fuels may create opportunities for us as
existing generating capacity is replaced with cleaner technologies. We are actively researching, developing and deploying a
range of products to serve this opportunity, including lower-carbon technologies that enable clean use of fossil fuels, such as
ultra-supercritical boilers; carbon-neutral technologies, such as biomass-fueled boilers and gasifiers; and gas-fired package
boiler technologies.
We expect the recent growth in backlog, which relates primarily to recent international coal boiler and renewable
waste to energy bookings, will provide revenue growth in this segment, although the rate of backlog growth is dependent on
many external factors described above.
Global Power Results
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except percentages)
2015
2014
$ Change
2014
2013
$ Change
Revenues
Gross Profit
$
639,970
111,309
$
471,929
94,647
$
168,041 $
16,662
471,929
94,647
$
712,461
126,275
$
(240,532)
(31,628)
% of Revenues
17.4%
20.1%
20.1%
17.7%
2015 vs 2014 Global Power Results: Revenues increased 35.6%, or $168.0 million, to $640.0 million in 2015 from
$471.9 million in 2014. The increase was due to higher new build steam generation systems revenues primarily related to
utility, industrial and renewable energy boiler projects of $188.3 million, which is net of a $7.8 million revenue reversal from
releasing our accrued claims receivable as part of the Berlin Station project legal settlement reached during 2015. The increase
in revenues was partially offset by a decline in new build environmental equipment revenues of $20.3 million as projects
related to previously enacted environmental rules and regulations near completion.
Gross profit increased $16.7 million to $111.3 million in 2015 from $94.6 million in 2014. Gross profit improvement
was primarily a result of the increase in revenues discussed above, partially offset by a lower level of net project improvements
in 2015 when compared to 2014. The projects nearing completion in 2014 had a more favorable mix of gross profit than in
2015. In addition, we recorded a $7.8 million loss in the year ended December 31, 2015 associated with the release of an
accrued claims receivable as part of the Berlin Station project legal settlement as compared to an $11.6 million loss recorded
for the same project in 2014.
2014 vs 2013 Global Power Results: Revenues decreased 33.8%, or $240.5 million, to $471.9 million in 2014 from
$712.5 million in 2013. A decrease in our new build steam generation activities contributed $101.4 million of this decline,
which was primarily due to a lower level of activity on renewable energy and industrial boiler projects. Another $139.2 million
of the revenue decline was primarily attributable to new build environmental activities from lower levels of engineering,
procurement and construction activities as projects related to the previously enacted environmental rules and regulations neared
completion and uncertainties continued regarding the ultimate outcome of environmental regulations.
34
Gross profit decreased $31.6 million to $94.6 million in 2014 from $126.3 million in 2013, primarily due to the
decreased revenues discussed above. This decline was partially offset due to a lower loss provision of $11.6 million on the
Berlin Station project in 2014 as compared to a loss provision of $35.6 million 2013.
Global Services Segment Description
Our Global Services segment provides a comprehensive mix of aftermarket products and services to support peak
efficiency and availability of steam generating and associated environmental and auxiliary equipment for power generation.
Our products and services include replacement parts, field technical services, retrofit and upgrade projects, fuel switching and
repowering projects, construction and maintenance services, start-up and commissioning, training programs and plant
operations and maintenance for our full complement of boiler, environmental and auxiliary equipment. We deliver these
aftermarket products and services to a large installed base for our and our competitors' power generation and industrial plants
globally through our extensive network of regionally located service centers, technical support personnel, and global sourcing
capabilities. Our customers consist of a wide range of utilities, independent power producers and industrial companies globally.
This segment's activity is dependent on the demand for electricity and ultimately the capacity utilization and associated
operations and maintenance expenditures of power generating companies and other steam-using industries.
While there is industry pressure on sales associated with the United States coal utility aftermarket, we continue to
see opportunities for growth and margin expansion in this segment relating to a variety of factors including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
consolidating and repositioning our infrastructure to meet the substantial recurring aftermarket products and
services opportunity with a strategically efficient and cost competitive operating model;
continued customer investment in existing power plants, particularly in North America, to enhance utilization
and operating efficiency levels, improve reliability and extend the useful life of existing plants;
leveraging our relationship network of strategic partners, particularly in North America, to expand our market
opportunity to supply aftermarket parts and services to installed units delivered by other original equipment
suppliers;
targeted repositioning of our global sales network in strategic countries to serve the aftermarket refurbishment
and maintenance of existing facilities outside North America; and
selling parts and maintenance services to industrial boiler customers and expanding our customer base for parts
and maintenance services in waste-to-energy as new builds come online.
We expect that our large installed base of power generation equipment will provide a solid foundation for a recurring
revenue stream.
Global Services Results
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except percentages)
2015
2014
$ Change
2014
2013
$ Change
Revenues
Gross Profit
$ 933,630
192,241
$ 908,682
193,629
$
24,948 $ 908,682
193,629
(1,388)
$ 1,055,190
225,434
$
(146,508)
(31,805)
% of Revenues
20.6%
21.3%
21.3%
21.4%
2015 vs 2014 Global Services Results: Revenues increased 2.7%, or $24.9 million to $933.6 million in 2015 from
$908.7 million in 2014. The increase was primarily related to a $49.1 million increase in revenue from project and construction
services related to retrofit projects as utilities and other industrial customers invested in their power generation assets. The
increase was partially offset by a $28.9 million decrease in boiler and auxiliary parts revenue due to lower maintenance
spending as low natural gas prices and moderate temperatures impacted the level of coal fired power generation. In addition,
revenues from operation & maintenance services increased $4.7 million primarily due to the new waste-to-energy facility in
Palm Beach County which began commercial operations in 2015.
35
Gross profit decreased $1.4 million to $192.2 million in 2015 from $193.6 million in 2014. Gross margin from the
increase in revenues discussed above, generally positive performance on service projects and improved margins on sales of
parts were offset by a $12.9 million contract loss accrual associated with an updated forecast of the cost to complete a large
construction services project, which has experienced unfavorable labor productivity and costs that exceeded our expectations.
2014 vs 2013 Global Services Results: Revenues decreased 13.9%, or $146.5 million, to $908.7 million in 2014
from $1.06 billion in 2013. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower service project revenues due mainly to a large
boiler retrofit that was completed in 2013 and a decrease in construction services environmental project revenues.
Gross profit decreased $31.8 million to $193.6 million in 2014 from $225.4 million in 2013, primarily due to the
decrease in revenues discussed above.
Industrial Environmental Segment Description
Our Industrial Environmental segment provides environmental products and services to numerous industrial end
markets through MEGTEC, which was acquired on June 20, 2014. Through this segment, we design, engineer and manufacture
products including oxidizers, solvent and distillation systems, wet electrostatic precipitators, scrubbers and heat recovery
systems. The segment also provides specialized industrial process systems, coating lines and equipment. Our suite of
technologies for pollution abatement includes systems that control volatile organic compounds and air toxics, particulate,
nitrogen oxides and acid gas air emissions from industrial processes. We serve a diverse set of industrial end markets with a
current emphasis on the chemical, pharmaceutical, energy storage, packaging, and automotive markets. This segment's activity
is dependent primarily on the capacity utilization of operating industrial plants and an increased emphasis on environmental
emissions globally across a broad range of industries and markets.
We see opportunities for growth in revenues in this segment relating to a variety of factors. Our new equipment
customers purchase equipment as part of major capacity expansions, to replace existing equipment, or in response to regulatory
initiatives. Additionally, our significant installed base provides a consistent and recurring aftermarket stream of parts, retrofits
and services. Major investments in global chemical markets have strengthened demand for MEGTEC equipment, while
tightening environmental regulations in the United States, China, India and other developing countries are creating new
opportunities. We foresee long-term trends toward increased environmental controls for industrial manufacturers around the
world. Finally, we will continue to seek acquisitions to expand our market presence and technology offerings.
Industrial Environmental Results
(In thousands, except percentages)
2015
2014
$ Change
Revenues
Gross Profit
% of Revenues
$
183,695
48,914
$
26.6%
105,418
24,961
$
23.7%
78,277
23,953
Year Ended December 31,
2015 vs 2014 Industrial Environmental Results: The year-over-year comparison reflects twelve months of
revenues and gross profit in 2015 compared to approximately six months in 2014.
Revenues increased 74.3%, or $78.3 million, to $183.7 million in 2015 from $105.4 million in 2014.
Gross profit increased 96.0%, or $24.0 million, to $48.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to
$25.0 million in 2014. Gross profit in 2015 also benefited from lower amortization expense as a result of our backlog intangible
asset becoming fully amortized as of June 30, 2015. See additional information on these intangible assets in Notes 2 and 3 to
the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses increased $14.7 million to $240.0 million in 2015 from
$225.3 million in 2014 due primarily to including a full year of SG&A expenses associated with MEGTEC and the incremental
36
costs of operating as a stand-alone public entity. The stand-alone costs to operate our business as an independent public entity
are expected to exceed the pre-spin allocations of expenses from BWC to us related to areas that include, but are not limited to,
litigation and other legal matters, compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other corporate governance matters, insurance
and claims management and the related cost of insurance. We estimate that we will incur annual incremental costs of $14
million to $16 million, of which we incurred approximately $8.5 million in the second half of 2015, to replace both the services
previously provided by BWC as well as other stand-alone costs, such as costs to create separate accounting, legal, senior
management and tax teams. Due to the scope and complexity of these activities, the amount and timing of these incremental
costs could vary and initial run rates could be slightly higher than the expected annual increase.
SG&A expenses increased $21.2 million to $225.3 million in 2014 from $204.1 million in 2013. The increase in
SG&A expenses in 2014 is primarily attributable to $17.5 million of SG&A expenses associated with MEGTEC, which was
acquired on June 20, 2014.
Also, as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8, we distributed
assets and liabilities totaling $47.8 million associated with our NE segment to BWC in conjunction with the spin-off on June
30, 2015. We received corporate allocations from our former Parent which totaled $2.7 million, $5.3 million and $9.8 million
for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Though these allocations relate to our discontinued NE
segment, they are included as part of selling, general and administrative expenses in the results from our continuing operations
because allocations are not eligible for inclusion in discontinued operations.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development expenses relate to the development and improvement of new and existing products and
equipment, as well as conceptual and engineering evaluation for translation into practical applications. These expenses were
$16.5 million, $18.5 million and $21.0 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Losses on Asset Disposal and Impairment
We experienced losses on asset disposals and impairments totaling $14.6 million, $1.8 million and $1.2 million in
2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The impairment charges recorded in 2015 were related to research and development
facilities and equipment dedicated to a carbon capture process that was determined not to be commercially viable and other
equipment primarily related to pilot testing capabilities that are no longer viable for current or future research and development
efforts. The impairment charges recorded in 2014 and 2013 were related to the cancellation of operations and maintenance
services contracts.
Equity in Income (Loss) of Investees
Our equity method investees include joint ventures in China and India, each of which manufactures boiler parts, and
a joint venture in Australia that sells and services industrial equipment and other project-related joint ventures. Additionally, in
2014, equity in income (loss) of investees included income from our interest in Ebensburg Power Company, in which we
purchased the remaining outstanding equity in May 2014 and now consolidate into the Global Services segment.
Equity in income of investees decreased $8.9 million to a loss of $0.2 million in 2015, as compared to income of
$8.7 million in 2014 primarily due to adverse market conditions in China and Australia and start-up costs relating to a new
manufacturing facility in India. Additionally, in 2014, we recognized income from a United States environmental project joint
venture that was substantially complete in 2014 and did not contribute equity income in 2015.
Equity in income of investees decreased $9.7 million to $8.7 million of income in 2014 from $18.4 million of
income in 2013 primarily due to adverse market conditions in China and Australia, new facility start-up costs in India and the
near completion of a United States environmental project joint venture that generated more operating income in the
corresponding period in 2013.
37
Restructuring
In 2014, we started our current restructuring initiatives that are expected to phase in annual savings totaling $35
million to $50 million when fully implemented. Through December 31, 2015, we have realized approximately $10 million of
savings, and we expect to realize approximately $15 million in 2016 and an additional $15 million in 2017. These activities
included manufacturing facility consolidation and outsourcing as well as reductions in force, consulting and other costs. We
expect the total cost of these restructuring initiatives to be in the range of $35 million to $50 million, of which we have incurred
$11.7 million and $20.2 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in total restructuring costs are non-cash charges
related to accelerated depreciation and impairment, which were $6.7 million and $7.0 million in the years ended December 31,
2015 and 2014, respectively.
Prior to contemplating the spin-off, beginning in 2012, our former Parent had also implemented restructuring
activities to enhance competitiveness and to better position the combined company, BWC, for growth, improved profitability
and to help offset increasingly competitive market conditions. These activities included operational and functional efficiency
improvements, organizational design changes and manufacturing optimization that were substantially complete prior to the
spin-off. A substantial part of these activities benefited us, primarily related to activities in 2013 and 2014. Annual savings from
these activities totaled more than $50 million for BWC as a whole. A total of $21.5 million of costs associated with these
previous restructuring activities were recognized through June 30, 2015, including $2.1 million and $18.3 million in 2014 and
2013, respectively. We have not recognized costs related to these prior restructuring activities in 2015.
Spin-off Transaction Costs
In the year ended December 31, 2015, we incurred $3.3 million of costs directly related to the spin-off of B&W from
BWC, primarily related to retention stock awards that had a one-year vesting period as of the June 30, 2015 date of the spin-off.
Mark to Market Adjustments For Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
We recognize actuarial gains and losses for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans into earnings as a
component of net periodic benefit cost, which affect both our cost of operations and SG&A. These mark to market ("MTM")
adjustments for our pension and other postretirement plans were gains (losses) of $(40.2) million, $(101.3) million and $92.1
million, in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and the effect on cost of operations and SG&A are detailed above and in Note 8
to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8. The MTM loss in 2015 was primarily related to
actual return on assets that fell short of the expected return, offset by an increase in the discount rate used to measure our
benefit plans liabilities. The MTM loss in 2014 was primarily related to a $46.9 million loss recognized on the adoption of a
new mortality assumption and a decline in the discount rate, offset by actual return on assets that exceeded the expected return.
The MTM gain of $92.1 million in 2013, primarily related to an increase in interest rates and actual return on assets that
exceeded our expected return.
Provision for Income Taxes
(In thousands, except percentages)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
Income tax provision
$
Effective tax rate
Year Ended December 31,
2015
20,205
3,671
2014
$
(36,618) $
(24,728)
2013
212,489
72,011
18.2%
67.5%
33.9%
38
We operate in numerous countries that have statutory tax rates below that of the United States federal statutory rate of
35%. The most significant of these foreign operations are located in Canada, Denmark and the United Kingdom with tax rates
of approximately 27%, 24% and 20%, respectively. Our jurisdictional mix of income (loss) before tax is also significantly
affected by MTM adjustments for our pension and postretirement plans, which are primarily in the United States. Income
(loss) before provision for income taxes generated in the United States and foreign locations for the years ended December 31,
2015, 2014 and 2013 is presented in the table below.
(In thousands)
United States
Other than the United States
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
(20,748) $
40,953
20,205
(64,084) $
27,466
(36,618)
135,966
76,523
212,489
In addition to jurisdictional mix of earnings, our income tax provision and our effective tax rate are also affected by
discrete items that do not occur in each period. In 2015, we had net unfavorable discrete items, primarily related to revaluing
our state deferred taxes, which increased the effective tax rate in 2015. In 2014, we had net favorable discrete items primarily
related to the receipt of a favorable ruling from the United States Internal Revenue Service that enabled us to amend prior year
United States income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 to exclude distributions of several of our foreign joint ventures from
domestic taxable income. Because 2014 was a loss year, this benefit resulted in an increase to the effective tax rate in 2014.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $146.5 million in 2015. At December 31, 2015, we had: cash and cash
equivalents of $365.2 million, including $80.6 million received from the former Parent at the time of the spin-off, net of
settlement of intercompany balances with our former Parent; investments with a fair value of $5.1 million, primarily held by
our captive insurer; and restricted cash and cash equivalents of $37.1 million, of which $3.7 million was held in restricted
foreign cash accounts and $33.4 million was held to meet reinsurance reserve requirements of our captive insurer in lieu of
long-term investments.
Of our $365.2 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2015, approximately $221.2 million,
or 60.6% is held outside of the United States and relates to foreign operations, though it is primarily held in U.S. dollars to
mitigate foreign exchange risk. In general, these resources are not available to fund our United States operations unless the
funds are repatriated to the United States, which could expose us to taxes we presently have not accrued in our financial
statements. We presently have no plans to repatriate these funds to the United States as the liquidity generated by our United
States operations is sufficient to meet the cash requirements of our United States operations.
Our investment portfolio consists primarily of investments in highly liquid money market instruments. Our
investments are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported
as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).
We are currently exploring growth strategies across our segments through acquisitions to expand and complement
our existing businesses. We would expect to fund these opportunities by cash on hand, external financing (including debt),
equity or some combination thereof. We expect cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, and our borrowing
capacity to be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for at least twelve months from the date of this filing.
Our net cash provided by operations was $170.4 million in 2015, compared to cash used in operations of $24.2
million in 2014. In addition to improvements in our operating income before MTM charges as discussed above, this increase in
cash provided by operations was also attributable to improved advance billings on various contracts in progress in our Global
Power segment and the operating results of our Global Services segment. Our long-term contracts are generally structured to
limit cash flow risk by billing in advance of incurring cash outflows. Particularly for larger contracts, this results in cash
generation at the beginning of the contract and cash outflow at the end of the contract as the work is completed.
39
Our net cash used in investing activities decreased by $102.8 million to $45.9 million in 2015 from $148.6 million in
2014 primarily because we acquired MEGTEC in 2014. We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $30 million to $32
million in 2016, which is lower than 2015 capital expenditures of $35.4 million due primarily to the near completion of the
expansion of a manufacturing facility in Mexico during 2015. Once the manufacturing facility in Mexico is complete, we
expect capital expenditures to reduce to approximately $25 million annually for our existing business.
Our net cash provided by financing activities was $53.6 million in 2015, compared to $211.7 million in 2014. Net
cash provided by financing activities in 2015 includes $80.6 million of cash received from the former Parent in the spin-off
transaction, partially offset by $24.3 million used to repurchase 1.3 million shares in the second half of 2015. In August 2015,
we announced that our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of our common stock, under which
we repurchased an additional 1.2 million shares of our common stock for $23.3 million in the period from January 1, 2016
through February 25, 2016. We are authorized to repurchase up to $52.4 million more of our common stock during the
remainder of 2016. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2014 includes $142.8 million of net cash transferred from the
former Parent inclusive of the purchase price of MEGTEC.
Credit Agreement
On June 30, 2015, our new credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") closed in connection with the spin-off transaction.
The Credit Agreement provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $600 million,
which is scheduled to mature on June 30, 2020. The proceeds of loans under the Credit Agreement are available for working
capital needs and other general corporate purposes, and the full amount is available to support the issuance of letters of credit.
The Credit Agreement contains an accordion feature that allows us, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions,
including the receipt of increased commitments from existing lenders or new commitments from new lenders, to increase the
amount of the commitments under the revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed the sum of (i) $200 million
plus (ii) an unlimited amount, so long as for any commitment increase under this subclause (ii) our senior secured leverage
ratio (assuming the full amount of any commitment increase under this subclause (ii) is drawn) is equal to or less than 2.0 to 1.0
after giving pro forma effect thereto.
The Credit Agreement and our obligations under certain hedging agreements and cash management agreements with
our lenders and their affiliates are (i) guaranteed by substantially all of our wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, but excluding
our captive insurance subsidiary, and (ii) secured by first-priority liens on certain assets owned by us and the guarantors. The
Credit Agreement requires interest payments on revolving loans on a periodic basis until maturity. We may prepay all loans at
any time without premium or penalty (other than customary LIBOR breakage costs), subject to notice requirements. The Credit
Agreement requires us to make certain prepayments on any outstanding revolving loans after receipt of cash proceeds from
certain asset sales or other events, subject to certain exceptions and a right to reinvest such proceeds in certain circumstances,
but such prepayments will not require us to reduce the commitments under the Credit Agreement.
Loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement bear interest at our option at either the LIBOR rate plus a margin
ranging from 1.375% to 1.875% per year or the base rate (the highest of the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, the one month
LIBOR rate plus 1.0%, or the administrative agent's prime rate) plus a margin ranging from 0.375% to 0.875% per year. A
commitment fee is charged on the unused portions of the revolving credit facility, and that fee varies between 0.25% and 0.35%
per year. Additionally, a letter of credit fee of between 1.375% and 1.875% per year is charged with respect to the amount of
each financial letter of credit issued, and a letter of credit fee of between 0.825% and 1.125% per year is charged with respect
to the amount of each performance letter of credit issued. The applicable margin for loans, the commitment fee and the letter of
credit fees set forth above vary quarterly based on our leverage ratio. Based on our leverage ratio at December 31, 2015, the
applicable margin for LIBOR and base rate loans was 1.375% and 0.375%, respectively. The commitment fee for the unused
portions of the revolving credit facility was 0.25% and the letter of credit fees for financial and performance letters of credit
was 1.375% and 0.825%, respectively.
The Credit Agreement includes financial covenants that are tested on a quarterly basis, based on the rolling four-
quarter period that ends on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The maximum permitted leverage ratio is 3.00 to 1.00, which
ratio may be increased to 3.25 to 1.00 for up to four consecutive fiscal quarters after a material acquisition. The minimum
40
consolidated interest coverage ratio is 4.00 to 1.00. In addition, the Credit Agreement contains various restrictive covenants,
including with respect to debt, liens, investments, mergers, acquisitions, dividends, equity repurchases and asset sales. At
December 31, 2015, we had no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility, and after giving effect to the
leverage ratio and $109.6 million of letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement, we had approximately $373 million
available for borrowings or to meet letter of credit requirements.
The Credit Agreement generally includes customary events of default for a secured credit facility. If an event of
default relating to bankruptcy or other insolvency events with respect to us occurs under the Credit Agreement, all obligations
will immediately become due and payable. If any other event of default exists, the lenders will be permitted to accelerate the
maturity of the obligations outstanding. If any event of default occurs, the lenders are permitted to terminate their commitments
thereunder and exercise other rights and remedies, including the commencement of foreclosure or other actions against the
collateral. Additionally, if we are unable to make any of the representations and warranties in the Credit Agreement, we will be
unable to borrow funds or have letters of credit issued. At December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all of the covenants
set forth in the Credit Agreement.
Other Credit Arrangements
Certain subsidiaries have credit arrangements with various commercial banks and other financial institutions for the
issuance of letters of credit and bank guarantees in association with contracting activity. The aggregate value of all such letters
of credit and bank guarantees as of December 31, 2015 was $193.1 million.
We have posted surety bonds to support contractual obligations to customers relating to certain projects. We utilize
bonding facilities to support such obligations, but the issuance of bonds under those facilities is typically at the surety's
discretion. Although there can be no assurance that we will maintain our surety bonding capacity, we believe our current
capacity is more than adequate to support our existing project requirements for the next twelve months. In addition, these bonds
generally indemnify customers should we fail to perform our obligations under the applicable contracts. We, and certain of our
subsidiaries, have jointly executed general agreements of indemnity in favor of surety underwriters relating to surety bonds
those underwriters issue in support of some of our contracting activity. As of December 31, 2015, bonds issued and outstanding
under these arrangements in support of contracts totaled approximately $541.7 million.
Long-term Benefit Obligations
Our unfunded pension and postretirement benefit obligations totaled $314.0 million at December 31, 2015. These
long-term liabilities are expected to require use of our resources to satisfy our future funding obligations. For the year ended
December 31, 2015, we made required contributions to our pension plans totaling $8.7 million and to our postretirement plans
of $3.8 million. See additional information on our long-term benefit obligations in Note 8 to our consolidated and combined
financial statements included in Item 8 of this annual report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the third quarter of 2014, we issued a letter of credit with a 4 year term totaling approximately $10 million in
support of a Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Energy Solutions Private Limited ("TBWES") working capital bank loan. TBWES is
an unconsolidated affiliate in India and the letter of credit can be drawn if TBWES defaults on the working capital bank loan.
The estimated fair value of this guarantee is $1.7 million, which was measured at inception and recorded in other liabilities on
our combined balance sheet, with an associated increase to our investments in unconsolidated affiliates.
TBWES also has long-term bank debt it secured in 2011, the proceeds from which were used to finance the
construction of the manufacturing facility it operates in India. At December 31, 2015, the long-term bank debt balance was
$59.7 million and was secured by TBWES' assets including land, building and equipment. Under the terms of our joint venture
operating agreement, we could be required to repay up to 49% of TBWES' long-term bank debt.
41
Contractual Obligations
Our cash requirements as of December 31, 2015 under current contractual obligations were as follows:
(In thousands)
Total
Less than 1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
After 5 Years
Operating lease payments $
$
Capital lease payments
16,428 $
2 $
5,443 $
2 $
7,522 $
— $
3,126 $
— $
337
—
The table above excludes cash payments for self-insured claims, litigation and funding of our pension and
postretirement benefit plans because we are uncertain as to the timing and amount of any associated cash payments that will be
required. For example, expected pension contributions are subject to potential contributions that may be required in connection
with acquisitions, dispositions or plan mergers. Also, estimated pension and other postretirement benefit payments are based on
actuarial estimates using current assumptions for, among other things, discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on plan
assets and health care costs. Additionally, the table above excludes deferred income taxes recorded on our balance sheets
because cash payments for income taxes are determined primarily on future taxable income. We have no long-term debt at
December 31, 2015.
Our contingent commitments under letters of credit, bank guarantees and surety bonds outstanding at December 31,
2015 expire as follows:
Total
Less than 1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
Thereafter
$844,409
$
464,862 $
318,288 $
48,034 $
13,225
(In thousands)
We do not expect significant cash payments associated with the contingent commitments included in the table above
because we expect to fulfill the performance commitments related to the underlying contracts.
EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States, using historical United States dollar accounting ("historical cost"). Statements based on historical cost, however, do not
adequately reflect the cumulative effect of increasing costs and changes in the purchasing power of the United States dollar,
especially during times of significant and continued inflation.
In order to minimize the negative impact of inflation on our operations, we attempt to cover the increased cost of
anticipated changes in labor, material and service costs, either through an estimate of those changes, which we reflect in the
original price, or through price escalation clauses in our contracts. However, there can be no assurance we will be able to cover
all changes in cost using this strategy.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by
management's application of accounting policies. We believe the following are our most critical accounting policies that we
apply in the preparation of our financial statements. These policies require our most difficult, subjective and complex
judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Contracts and Revenue Recognition
We determine the appropriate accounting method for each of our long-term contracts before work on the project
begins. We generally recognize contract revenues and related costs on a percentage-of-completion ("POC") method for
individual contracts or combinations of contracts based on a cost-to-cost method, as applicable to the product or activity
involved. We recognize estimated contract revenues and resulting income based on costs incurred to date as a percentage of
42
total estimated costs. Certain costs may be excluded from the cost-to-cost method of measuring progress, such as significant
costs for materials and major third-party subcontractors, if it appears that such exclusion would result in a more meaningful
measurement of actual contract progress and resulting periodic allocation of income. For all contracts, if a current estimate of
total contract cost indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss is recognized in full when determined. It is possible that
current estimates could materially change for various reasons, including, but not limited to, fluctuations in forecasted labor
productivity or steel and other raw material prices. We routinely review estimates related to our contracts, and revisions to
profitability are reflected in the quarterly and annual earnings we report. For parts orders and certain aftermarket services
activities, we recognize revenues as goods are delivered and work is performed.
In the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we recognized net changes in estimates related to long-term
contracts accounted for on the POC basis which increased operating income by $0.4 million, $26.3 million and $8.8 million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2015, we have estimated the costs to complete all of our in-process contracts in order to
estimate revenues in accordance with the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. However, it is possible that current
estimates could change due to project performance or unforeseen events, which could result in adjustments to overall contract
costs. Variations from estimated contract performance could result in material adjustments to operating results for any fiscal
quarter or year.
We recognize income from contract change orders or claims when formally agreed with the customer. We regularly
assess the collectability of contract revenues and receivables from customers. We recognize accrued claims in contract revenues
for extra work or changes in scope of work to the extent of costs incurred when we believe the following accounting criteria
have been met:
a) The contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim; or a legal opinion has been obtained,
stating that under the circumstances there is a reasonable basis to support the claim.
b) Additional costs are caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and are not the result of
deficiencies in the contractor's performance.
c) Costs associated with the claim are identifiable or otherwise determinable and are reasonable in view of the
work performed.
d) The evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable, not based on management's feel for the situation
or on unsupported representations.
At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we recognized accrued claims totaling $2.3 million and $8.2 million,
respectively.
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
We use the equity method of accounting for affiliates in which our investment ownership ranges from 20% to 50%,
unless significant economic or governance considerations indicate that we are unable to exert significant influence, in which
case the cost method is used. The equity method is also used for affiliates in which our investment ownership is greater than
50% but we do not have a controlling interest. Currently, all of our material investments in affiliates that are not included in our
consolidated and combined financial statements are recorded using the equity method. Our primary equity method investees
include joint ventures in China, India and Australia. Affiliates in which our investment ownership is less than 20% and where
we are unable to exert significant influence are carried at cost.
We assess our investments in unconsolidated affiliates for other-than-temporary-impairment when significant
changes occur in the investee's business or our investment philosophy. Such changes might include a series of operating losses
incurred by the investee that are deemed other than temporary, the inability of the investee to sustain an earnings capacity that
would justify the carrying amount of the investment or a change in the strategic reasons that were important when we originally
entered into the joint venture. If an other-than-temporary-impairment were to occur, we would measure our investment in the
unconsolidated affiliate at fair value.
Our total investment in equity method investees is $92.2 million, including a $14.9 million investment in a start-up
venture in India, TBWES, that completed construction of its manufacturing facility intended primarily for new build coal boiler
43
projects in India in 2014. While TBWES has not yet recorded a profit, we have determined that an other-than-temporary-
impairment is not present based on the expected cash flows and strategy for TBWES. Continuing future losses or changes in
the strategy of TBWES or other joint ventures could affect future assessments of other-than-temporary-impairment.
Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefits
We utilize actuarial and other assumptions in calculating the cost and benefit obligations of our pension and
postretirement benefits. The assumptions utilized in the determination of our benefit cost and obligations include assumptions
regarding discount rates, expected returns on plan assets, mortality and health care cost trends. The assumptions utilized
represent our best estimates based on historical experience and other factors.
Actual experience that differs from these assumptions or future changes in assumptions will affect our recognized
benefit obligations and related costs. We recognize net actuarial gains and losses into earnings in the fourth quarter of each
year, or as interim remeasurements are required, as a component of net periodic benefit cost. Net actuarial gains and losses
occur when actual experience differs from any of the various assumptions used to value our pension and postretirement benefit
plans or when assumptions, which are revisited annually through our update of our actuarial valuations, change due to current
market conditions or underlying demographic changes. The primary factors contributing to net actuarial gains and losses are
changes in the discount rate used to value the obligations as of the measurement date each year, the difference between the
actual and expected return on plan assets and changes in health care cost trends. The effect of changes in the discount rate and
expected rate of return on plan assets in combination with the actual return on plan assets can result in significant changes in
our estimated pension and postretirement benefit cost and our consolidated and combined financial condition.
For 2016, we will change our approach to setting the discount rate from a single equivalent discount rate to an
alternative spot rate method. This change in estimate will be applied prospectively in developing our annual discount rate,
which will result in a lower interest and service cost in 2016. The impact of the change in estimate did not change our pension
and other postretirement benefits liability as of December 31, 2015, because any change is completely offset in the net actuarial
gain (loss) recorded in the annual mark to market adjustment. This new method was adopted because it more accurately applies
each year’s spot rates to the projected cash flows.
In 2014, we adjusted our mortality assumption to reflect mortality improvements identified by the Society of
Actuaries, adjusted for our experience. The impact of the change in this assumption caused a $46.9 million increase in our
pension liability.
The following sensitivity analysis shows the impact of a 25 basis point change in the assumed discount rate and
return on assets on our pension plan obligations and expense for the year ended December 31, 2015:
(In millions)
Discount rate:
Effect on ongoing net periodic benefit cost(1)
Effect on project benefit obligation
Return on assets:
Effect on ongoing net periodic benefit cost
(1) Excludes effect of annual mark to market adjustment.
.25% increase
.25% decrease
$
$
(29.6) $
(31.8)
(2.3) $
31.1
33.4
2.3
A 25 basis point change in the assumed discount rate, return on assets and health care cost trend rate would have no
meaningful impact on our other postretirement benefit plan obligations and expense for the year ended December 31, 2015
individually or in the aggregate, excluding the impact of any annual mark to market adjustments we record annually.
Loss Contingencies
We estimate liabilities for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
loss is reasonably estimable. We provide disclosure when there is a reasonable possibility that the ultimate loss will exceed the
recorded provision or if such probable loss is not reasonably estimable. We are currently involved in some significant litigation.
44
See Note 11 to the consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8 for a discussion of this litigation. As
disclosed, we have accrued estimates of the probable losses associated with these matters; however, these matters are typically
resolved over long periods of time and are often difficult to estimate due to the possibility of multiple actions by third parties.
Therefore, it is possible that future earnings could be affected by changes in our estimates related to these matters.
Goodwill and Long-Lived Asset Impairment
Each year, we evaluate goodwill at each reporting unit to assess recoverability, and impairments, if any, are
recognized in earnings. We perform a qualitative analysis when we believe that there is sufficient excess fair value over
carrying value based on our most recent quantitative assessment, adjusted for relevant facts and circumstances that could affect
fair value. Deterioration in macroeconomic, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, share
price decline or entity and reporting unit specific events could cause us to believe a qualitative test is no longer appropriate.
When we determine that it is appropriate to test goodwill for impairment utilizing a quantitative test, the first step of
the test compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. We utilize both the income and
market valuation approaches to provide inputs into the estimate of the fair value of our reporting units, which would be
considered by market participants.
Under the income valuation approach, we employ a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of each
reporting unit. This model requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions regarding future revenues, costs, margins,
capital expenditures, changes in working capital, terminal year growth rate and cost of capital. Our cash flow models are based
on our forecasted results for the applicable reporting units. Actual results could differ materially from our projections. Some
assumptions, such as future revenues, costs and changes in working capital are company driven and could be affected by a loss
of one or more significant contracts or customers; failure to control costs on certain contracts; or a decline in demand based on
changing economic, industry or regulatory conditions. Changes in external market conditions may affect certain other
assumptions, such as the cost of capital. Market conditions can be volatile and are outside of our control.
Under the market valuation approach, we employ both the guideline publicly traded company method and the similar
transactions method. The guideline publicly traded company method indicates the fair value of the equity of each reporting unit
by comparing it to publicly traded companies in similar lines of business. The similar transactions method considers recent
prices paid for business in our industry or related industries. After identifying and selecting guideline companies and similar
transactions, we analyze their business and financial profiles for relative similarity. Factors such as size, growth, risk and
profitability are analyzed and compared to each of our reporting units. Assumptions include the selection of our peer companies
and use of market multiples, which could deteriorate or increase based on the profitability of our competitors and performance
of their stock, which is often dependent on the performance of the stock market and general economy as a whole.
Adverse changes in these assumptions utilized within the first step of our impairment test could cause a reduction or
elimination of excess fair value over carrying value, resulting in potential recognition of impairment. If the carrying amount of
a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of
the impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying
amount of that goodwill.
We completed our annual review of goodwill for each of our reporting units for the year ended December 31, 2015,
which indicated that we had no impairment of goodwill. The fair value of our reporting units was substantially in excess of
carrying value.
We carry our property, plant and equipment at depreciated cost, reduced by provisions to recognize economic
impairment when we determine impairment has occurred. Property, plant and equipment amounts are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset, or asset group, may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. The amount of the
impairment loss to be recorded is calculated by the excess of the asset carrying value over its fair value. Fair value is generally
determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. Our estimates of cash flow may differ from actual cash flow due to, among
45
other things, technological changes, economic conditions or changes in operating performance. Any changes in such factors
may negatively affect our business and result in future asset impairments.
In the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a $14.6 million impairment charge. The impairment
charge was related to research and development facilities and equipment dedicated to a carbon capture process that was
determined not to be commercially viable and other equipment primarily related to pilot testing capabilities that are no longer
viable for current or future research and development efforts. The impairment is included in losses on asset disposals and
impairments, net in our consolidated and combined financial statements included in Item 8 of this annual report.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense for federal, foreign, state and local income taxes is calculated on pre-tax income based on
current tax law and includes the cumulative effect of any changes in tax rates from those used previously in determining
deferred tax assets and liabilities. Before the spin-off transaction, we were included in the consolidated United States federal
and certain consolidated/combined state tax returns filed by BWC. After the spin-off, we file our own federal and state income
tax returns. Both prior to and after the spin-off, our foreign subsidiaries operate and file tax returns in various foreign
jurisdictions. For both the pre-spin and post-spin periods, we compute the provision for income taxes on a separate tax return
basis as if we filed our own tax returns. For the pre-spin period, we deem the amounts that we would have paid or received
from the United States Internal Revenue Service and certain state jurisdictions had we not been a member of BWC's
consolidated tax group to be immediately settled with BWC. We entered into a tax sharing agreement with BWC in connection
with the spin-off that allocates the responsibility for prior period taxes of BWC consolidated tax reporting group between us
and BWC and its subsidiaries. However, if BWC were unable to pay, we could be required to pay the entire amount of such
taxes.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. We assess deferred taxes and the adequacy of the valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. In the ordinary course of
business there is inherent uncertainty in quantifying our income tax positions. We assess our income tax positions and record
tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon management's evaluation of the facts, circumstances, and
information available at the reporting date. For those tax positions where it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will be
sustained, we have recorded the largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income tax positions
where it is not more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in the consolidated
and combined financial statements. We record interest and penalties (net of any applicable tax benefit) related to income taxes
as a component of the provision for income taxes in our consolidated and combined statements of operations.
Warranty
We accrue estimated expense included in cost of operations on our consolidated and combined statements of
operations to satisfy contractual warranty requirements when we recognize the associated revenues on the related contracts. In
addition, we record specific provisions or reductions when we expect the actual warranty costs to significantly differ from the
accrued estimates. Factors that impact our estimate of warranty costs include prior history of warranty claims and our estimates
of future costs of materials and labor. Such changes could have a material effect on our consolidated and combined financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Item 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash equivalents and our
investment portfolio, which primarily consists of investments in United States Government obligations and highly liquid
money market instruments denominated in United States dollars. We are averse to principal loss and seek to ensure the safety
and preservation of our invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. Our investments are
classified as available-for-sale.
46
We have no material future earnings or cash flow exposures from changes in interest rates on our long-term debt
obligations.
We have operations in many foreign locations, and, as a result, our financial results could be significantly affected by
factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange ("FX") rates or weak economic conditions in those foreign markets. In
order to manage the risks associated with FX rate fluctuations, we attempt to hedge those risks with FX derivative instruments.
Historically, we have hedged those risks with FX forward contracts. We do not enter into speculative derivative positions.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The following tables provide information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest
rates. The tables present principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates.
At December 31, 2015, Principal Amount by Expected Maturity
Years Ending December 31,
(In thousands, except percentages)
2016
2017 - 2021
Thereafter
Total
Investments
Average Interest Rate
Debt
Average Interest Rate
$
$
3,996
0.36%
2,005
$
$
5.1%
— $
—%
— $
—%
1,172
$
5,169
—%
— $
—%
0.28%
2,005
5.1%
$
$
At December 31, 2014, Principal Amount by Expected Maturity
Years Ending December 31,
(In thousands, except percentages)
2015
2016 - 2020
Thereafter
Total
Investments
Average Interest Rate
Debt
Average Interest Rate
$
$
1,607
0.22%
3,215
$
$
6.3%
— $
—%
— $
—%
$
214
2.57%
— $
—%
1,820
0.49%
3,215
$
$
6.3%
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
Fair Value at
December 31, 2015
Fair Value at
December 31, 2014
5,089
—
2,014
—
1,820
—
3,219
—
The following table provides information about our FX forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2015 and
presents such information in United States dollar equivalents. The table presents notional amounts and related weighted-
average FX rates by expected (contractual) maturity dates and constitutes a forward-looking statement. These notional amounts
generally are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. The average contractual FX rates
are expressed using market convention, which is dependent on the currencies being bought and sold under the forward contract.
Forward Contracts to Purchase Foreign Currencies in United States Dollars
(In thousands)
Foreign Currency
British pound sterling
British pound sterling (Selling Euro)
Danish krone
Euro (Selling British pound sterling)
United States dollar (Selling British pound sterling)
United States dollar (Selling Canadian dollar)
United States dollar (Selling Euro)
(In thousands)
Foreign Currency
Euro (Selling British pound sterling)
Year Ending
Fair Value at
Average Contractual
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
Exchange Rate
1,626 $
2,369 $
773 $
39,846 $
856 $
5,108 $
1,215 $
(68)
(33)
(17)
1,346
36
198
36
1.5464
0.7286
6.6047
0.7162
1.5460
1.3303
1.1266
Year Ending
Fair Value at
Average Contractual
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2015
Exchange Rate
22,472 $
688
0.7257
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
47
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
48
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated and combined balance sheets of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated and combined statements of operations,
comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2015. These consolidated and combined financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit
of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated and combined financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
The Board of Directors of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (“BWC”) approved the spin-off of the Company through the
distribution of common stock of the Company on June 30, 2015 to existing shareholders of BWC. See Note 1 to the
consolidated and combined financial statements.
/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 25, 2016
49
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
$
1,757,295 $
1,486,029 $
1,767,651
1,449,138
1,266,996
1,331,170
16,543
14,597
239,968
14,946
18,483
1,752
225,271
20,183
1,735,192
(242)
1,532,685
8,681
21,861
(37,975)
618
(1,059)
(1,215)
(1,656)
20,205
3,671
16,534
2,803
19,337
(196)
1,060
(492)
789
1,357
(36,618)
(24,728)
(11,890)
(14,272)
(26,162)
(366)
21,043
1,181
204,070
18,343
1,575,807
18,387
210,231
1,276
(462)
1,444
2,258
212,489
72,011
140,478
34,338
174,816
(289)
19,141 $
(26,528) $
174,527
16,338
2,803
(12,256)
(14,272)
19,141 $
(26,528) $
140,189
34,338
174,527
0.31 $
0.05
0.36 $
0.30 $
0.06
0.36 $
(0.23) $
(0.26)
(0.49) $
(0.23) $
(0.26)
(0.49) $
2.51
0.61
3.12
2.49
0.61
3.10
53,487,071
53,708,983
54,238,631
54,238,631
55,950,875
56,342,709
$
$
$
$
$
$
Revenues
Costs and expenses
Cost of operations
Research and development costs
Losses on asset disposals and impairments
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Restructuring activities and spin-off transaction costs
Total costs and expenses
Equity in income (loss) of investees
Operating income (loss)
Other income (expense)
Interest income
Interest expense
Other, net
Total other income (expense)
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
Income tax expense (benefit)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
Net income (loss)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders
Amounts attributable to Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. shareholders
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
Shares used in the computation of earnings per share (Note 18)
Basic
Diluted
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
50
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Currency translation adjustments
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
(In thousands)
$
19,337 $
(26,162) $
174,816
(19,459)
(26,895)
(2,529)
Derivative financial instruments:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
Income taxes
Total unrealized gains (losses) on derivative financial
instruments, net of tax
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
Income taxes
Total reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
(loss), net of tax
Benefit obligations:
Amortization of benefit plan costs
Income taxes
Total amortization of benefit plan costs, net of tax
Investments:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
Income taxes
Total unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period, net of
tax
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
Income taxes
Total reclassification adjustments for losses included in net
income, net of tax
282
57
339
1,557
(424)
1,133
1,504
(1,180)
324
(65)
16
(49)
42
(15)
27
(3,184)
824
(2,360)
2,169
(559)
(3,885)
990
(2,895)
3,137
(773)
1,610
2,364
3,650
(1,005)
2,645
277
(155)
122
(2)
—
(2)
—
—
—
37
11
48
—
—
—
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
(17,685)
1,652
(183)
(25,002)
(51,164)
(329)
(2,890)
171,926
(255)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareholders
$
1,469 $
(51,493) $
171,671
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
51
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
Investments
Accounts receivable – trade, net
Accounts receivable – other
Contracts in progress
Inventories
Deferred income taxes
Other current assets
Assets of discontinued operations
Total current assets
Net property, plant and equipment
Investments
Goodwill
Deferred income taxes
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
Intangible assets
Other assets
Assets of discontinued operations
TOTAL ASSETS
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
December 31,
2015
2014
(In thousands)
$
365,192 $
218,659
37,144
3,996
291,242
44,765
128,174
90,119
—
17,552
—
978,184
145,717
1,093
201,069
190,656
92,196
37,844
16,286
—
26,311
1,607
265,456
36,147
107,751
98,711
36,601
11,347
46,177
848,767
135,237
214
209,277
115,111
109,248
50,646
9,226
38,828
$
1,663,045 $
1,516,554
52
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short-term line of credit
Accounts payable
Accrued employee benefits
Advance billings on contracts
Accrued warranty expense
Other accrued liabilities
Liabilities of discontinued operations
Total current liabilities
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
Pension liability
Other liabilities
Liabilities of discontinued operations
TOTAL LIABILITIES
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders' equity
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued
52,480,630 and 0 shares at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, authorized 20,000,000 shares; no shares
issued
Capital in excess of par value
Treasury stock at cost, 1,376,226 shares at December 31, 2015
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Former net parent investment
Stockholders' equity attributable to shareholders
Noncontrolling interest
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
December 31,
2015
2014
(In thousands,
except share and per share amounts)
$
2,005 $
175,170
51,476
229,390
39,847
63,464
—
561,352
27,768
282,133
43,365
—
914,618
540
—
790,464
(25,408)
965
(18,853)
—
747,708
719
748,427
3,215
160,606
39,464
148,098
37,735
54,827
44,145
488,090
28,347
253,763
42,929
15,988
829,117
—
—
—
—
—
10,374
676,036
686,410
1,027
687,437
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
$
1,663,045 $
1,516,554
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
53
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common Stock
Shares
Par Value
Capital In
Excess of
Par Value
Treasury
Stock
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Former Parent
Investment
Noncontrolling
Interest
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance December 31, 2012
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
38,647 $
267,286 $
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Net income
Increase in note receivable
Currency translation adjustments
Derivative financial instruments
Defined benefit obligations
Available-for-sale investments
Stock-based compensation
Dividends to noncontrolling interests
Distribution of Nuclear Energy segment
to former Parent
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,495)
(531)
123
48
—
—
(453)
174,527
47,408
—
—
—
—
160
—
—
783 $
289
—
(34)
—
—
—
—
(114)
—
306,716
174,816
47,408
(2,529)
(531)
123
48
160
(114)
(453)
Balance December 31, 2013
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
35,339 $
489,381 $
924 $
525,644
Net income (loss)
Currency translation adjustments
Derivative financial instruments
Defined benefit obligations
Available-for-sale investments
Stock-based compensation
Dividends to noncontrolling interests
Net transfers from former Parent
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(26,528)
(26,858)
(750)
2,645
(2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
108
—
213,075
366
(37)
—
—
—
—
(226)
—
(26,162)
(26,895)
(750)
2,645
(2)
108
(226)
213,075
Balance December 31, 2014
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
10,374 $
676,036 $
1,027 $
687,437
Net income
Currency translation adjustments
Derivative financial instruments
Defined benefit obligations
Available-for-sale investments
Stock-based compensation
Repurchased shares
Dividends to noncontrolling interests
Net transfers from former Parent
Distribution of Nuclear Energy segment
to former Parent
Reclassification of former Parent
investment to capital in excess of par
value and common stock
Balance December 31, 2015
—
—
—
—
—
137
(1,376)
—
—
—
53,720
52,481 $
—
—
—
—
—
17
(14)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7,772
—
—
—
—
537
782,692
—
—
—
—
—
(1,143)
(24,265)
—
—
—
—
965
—
18,176
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(19,446)
1,472
324
(22)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
—
—
125,295
(11,555)
(36,284)
—
(783,229)
196
(13)
—
—
—
—
—
(491)
—
—
—
19,337
(19,459)
1,472
324
(22)
6,652
(24,279)
(491)
125,295
(47,839)
—
540 $
790,464 $
(25,408)$
965 $
(18,853)$
— $
719 $
748,427
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
54
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
2015
Year Ended December 31,
2014
(In thousands)
2013
$
19,337 $
(26,162) $
174,816
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)
Non-cash items included in net income (loss):
Depreciation and amortization
Income of investees, net of dividends
Losses on asset disposals and impairments
Write-off of accrued claims receivable
Provision for (benefit from) deferred taxes
Recognition of (gains) losses for pension and other postretirement plans
Stock-based compensation and thrift plan expense
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
Accounts receivable
Accounts payable
Contracts in progress and advance billings on contracts
Inventories
Income taxes
Accrued and other current liabilities
Pension liability, accrued postretirement benefit obligation and employee benefits
Other, net
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
Purchase of intangible assets
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
Sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities
Proceeds from (cost of) asset disposals
Investment in equity and cost method investees
NET CASH FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payment of short-term borrowings and long-term debt
Payment of debt issuance costs
Net transfers from former Parent
Repurchase of common shares
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
Other
NET CASH FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
EFFECTS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
CASH FLOWS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Operating cash flows from discontinued operations, net
Investing cash flows from discontinued operations, net
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash
NET CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
34,932
242
16,881
7,832
(32,121)
40,611
7,773
(33,977)
17,863
62,971
6,060
9,275
11,464
(2,336)
3,592
170,399
6,298
(35,397)
—
—
(14,008)
5,266
(587)
(7,424)
(45,852)
(1,080)
—
80,589
(25,408)
—
(491)
53,610
(6,407)
171,750
(25,194)
(23)
—
(25,217)
146,533
218,659
32,436
8,743
5,989
—
(42,023)
101,792
(11)
(13,797)
(8,860)
(99,192)
4,309
10,123
9,660
(17,259)
10,028
(24,224)
(5,646)
(15,475)
(127,705)
(722)
(4,450)
10,118
149
(4,900)
(148,631)
(4,538)
2,967
213,137
—
11
89
211,666
(12,573)
26,238
(191)
(1,729)
3,023
1,103
27,341
191,318
23,030
1,995
2,580
—
56,107
(91,358)
(172)
4,898
(13,354)
(97,360)
10,769
(23,309)
(22,520)
(20,053)
10,331
16,400
11,419
(11,588)
—
—
(11,111)
3,973
507
(6,884)
(13,684)
(212)
484
47,445
—
172
(114)
47,775
(4,024)
46,467
(28,723)
(4,974)
3,012
(30,685)
15,782
175,536
191,318
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
$
365,192 $
218,659 $
See accompanying notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.
55
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2015
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. ("B&W", "we", "us" or "our") operates in three business segments as described
below and was wholly owned by The Babcock & Wilcox Company ("BWC" or the "former Parent") until June 30, 2015 when
BWC distributed 100% of our outstanding common stock to the BWC shareholders through a tax-free spin-off transaction (the
"spin-off"). BWC is now known as BWX Technologies, Inc. On and prior to June 30, 2015 our financial position, operating
results and cash flows consisted of The Power Generation Operations of BWC ("BW PGG"), which represented a combined
reporting entity comprised of the assets and liabilities in managing and operating the Power Generation segment of BWC,
combined with related captive insurance operations that were contributed in connection with the spin-off by BWC to B&W. In
addition, BW PGG also includes certain assets and liabilities of BWC's Nuclear Energy ("NE") segment that were transferred to
BWC. We have treated the assets, liabilities, operating results and cash flows of the NE business as a discontinued operation in
our consolidated and combined financial statements. See Note 13 for further information.
Our consolidated and combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 consists of the consolidated balances of B&W,
while our consolidated and combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 consists of the combined balances of BW PGG.
Our consolidated and combined statements of operations and our consolidated and combined statements of cash flows consist
of the combined results of BW PGG for periods June 30, 2015 and prior and the consolidated results of B&W after June 30,
2015.
On June 8, 2015, BWC's board of directors approved the spin-off of B&W through the distribution of shares of B&W
common stock to holders of BWC common stock. The distribution of B&W common stock was made on June 30, 2015 and
consisted of one share of B&W common stock for every two shares of BWC common stock to holders of BWC common stock
as of 5:00 p.m. New York City time on the record date, June 18, 2015. Cash was paid in lieu of any fractional shares of B&W
common stock. On June 30, 2015, B&W became a separate publicly-traded company, and BWC did not retain any ownership
interest in B&W. A registration statement on Form 10 describing the spin-off was filed by B&W with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and was declared effective on June 16, 2015 (as amended through the time of such effectiveness, the
"Form 10").
We have presented our consolidated and combined financial statements in United States dollars in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"). We have included all adjustments, in the opinion of
management, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation. We use the equity method to
account for investments in entities that we do not control, but over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence.
We generally refer to these entities as "joint ventures." We have eliminated all intercompany transactions and accounts. We
present the notes to our consolidated and combined financial statements on the basis of continuing operations, unless otherwise
stated.
Through June 30, 2015, certain corporate and general and administrative expenses, including those related to executive
management, tax, accounting, legal, information technology, treasury services, and certain employee benefits, have been
allocated by BWC to us to reflect all costs of doing business related to these operations in the financial statements, including
expenses incurred by related entities on our behalf. The majority of these allocations of management and support services costs
are based on specific identification methods such as direct usage and level of effort. The remainder is allocated on the basis of a
three-factor formula that considered proportional revenue generated, payroll and fixed assets. Management believes such
allocations are reasonable. However, the associated expenses reflected in the accompanying consolidated and combined
statements of operations may not be indicative of the actual expenses that would have been incurred had we been operating as
an independent public company for the periods presented. Following the spin-off from BWC, we have been performing these
functions using internal resources or purchased services, certain of which have been provided by BWC pursuant to a transition
services agreement. Refer to Note 8 for a detailed description of transactions with other affiliates of BWC.
56
We have reclassified amounts previously reported to conform to the presentation as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2015 and 2014, attributable to the treatment of NE as a discontinued operation.
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Reportable Segments
We operate in three reportable segments: Global Power, Global Services, and Industrial Environmental. Our reportable
segments are further described as follows:
•
•
•
Our Global Power segment represents our worldwide new build boiler and environmental products operations.
Through this segment, we engineer, manufacture, procure, construct and commission steam generating and
environmental systems and other related equipment. Our boilers are designed for utility and industrial applications,
fired with fossil and renewable fuels and include advanced supercritical boilers, subcritical boilers, fluidized bed
boilers, biomass-fired boilers, waste-to-energy boilers, chemical recovery boilers, industrial power boilers, package
boilers, heat recovery steam generators and waste heat boilers. Our environmental systems offer air pollution control
systems and related equipment for the treatment of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, fine particulate, mercury, acid
gases and other hazardous air emissions and include wet and dry flue gas desulfurization systems, catalytic and non-
catalytic nitrogen oxides reduction systems, low nitrogen oxides burners and overfire air systems, fabric filter
baghouses, wet and dry electrostatic precipitators, mercury control systems and dry sorbent injection for acid gas
mitigation. Our customers consist of a wide range of utilities, independent power producers and industrial companies
globally.
Our Global Services segment provides a comprehensive mix of aftermarket products and services to support peak
efficiency and availability of steam generating and associated environmental and auxiliary equipment for power
generation. Our products and services include replacement parts, field technical services, retrofit and upgrade
projects, fuel switching and repowering projects, construction and maintenance services, start-up and commissioning,
training programs and plant operations and maintenance for our full complement of boiler, environmental and
auxiliary equipment. We deliver these aftermarket products and services to a large installed base for our and our
competitors' power generation and industrial plants globally through our extensive network of regionally located
service centers, technical support personnel, and global sourcing capabilities. Our customers consist of a wide range
of utilities, independent power producers and industrial companies globally.
Our Industrial Environmental segment provides environmental products and services to numerous industrial end
markets through Babcock & Wilcox MEGTEC Holdings, Inc. ("MEGTEC"), which we acquired on June 20, 2014.
Through this segment, we design, engineer and manufacture products including oxidizers, solvent and distillation
systems, wet and dry electrostatic precipitators, fabric filter baghouses, scrubbers and heat recovery systems. The
segment also provides specialized industrial process systems, coating lines and equipment. Our suite of technologies
for pollution abatement include systems that control volatile organic compounds and air toxins, particulate, nitrogen
oxides and acid gas air emissions from industrial processes. We serve a diverse set of industrial end markets with a
current emphasis on the chemical, pharmaceutical, energy storage, packaging and automotive markets.
For financial information about our segments, see Note 17 to our consolidated and combined financial statements.
Use of Estimates
We use estimates and assumptions to prepare our financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Some of our more
significant estimates include our estimate of costs to complete long-term construction contracts, estimates of costs to be
incurred to satisfy contractual warranty requirements, estimates of the value of acquired intangible assets and estimates we
make in selecting assumptions related to the valuations of our pension and postretirement plans, including the selection of our
discount rates, mortality and expected rates of return on our pension plan assets. These estimates and assumptions affect the
amounts we report in our financial statements and accompanying notes. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.
Variances could result in a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations in future periods.
57
Earnings Per Share
We have computed earnings per common share on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares, and,
where dilutive, common share equivalents, outstanding during the indicated periods. We have a number of forms of stock-based
compensation, including incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares
and performance units, subject to satisfaction of specific performance goals. We include the shares applicable to these plans in
dilutive earnings per share when related performance criteria have been met.
Investments
Our investments, primarily highly liquid money market instruments, are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at
fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). We classify investments available for current operations in the consolidated and combined balance sheets as
current assets, while we classify investments held for long-term purposes as noncurrent assets. We adjust the amortized cost of
debt securities for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. That amortization is included in interest
income. We include realized gains and losses on our investments in other - net in our consolidated and combined statements of
operations. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. We include interest on securities in interest
income.
Foreign Currency Translation
We translate assets and liabilities of our foreign operations into United States dollars at current exchange rates, and we
translate items in our statement of operations at average exchange rates for the periods presented. We record adjustments
resulting from the translation of foreign currency financial statements as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). We report foreign currency transaction gains and losses in income. We have included in other - net transaction
gains (losses) of $(0.1) million, $1.8 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively.
Contracts and Revenue Recognition
We generally recognize contract revenues and related costs on a percentage-of-completion method for individual
contracts or combinations of contracts based on work performed, man hours or a cost-to-cost method, as applicable to the
product or activity involved. We recognize estimated contract revenue and resulting income based on the measurement of the
extent of progress completion as a percentage of the total project. Certain costs may be excluded from the cost-to-cost method
of measuring progress, such as significant costs for materials and major third-party subcontractors, if it appears that such
exclusion would result in a more meaningful measurement of actual contract progress and resulting periodic allocation of
income. We include revenues and related costs so recorded, plus accumulated contract costs that exceed amounts invoiced to
customers under the terms of the contracts, in contracts in progress. We include in advance billings on contracts billings that
exceed accumulated contract costs and revenues and costs recognized under the percentage-of-completion method. Most long-
term contracts contain provisions for progress payments. Our unbilled receivables do not contain an allowance for credit losses
as we expect to invoice customers and collect all amounts for unbilled revenues. We review contract price and cost estimates
periodically as the work progresses and reflect adjustments proportionate to the percentage-of-completion in income in the
period when those estimates are revised. For all contracts, if a current estimate of total contract cost indicates a loss on a
contract, the projected loss is recognized in full when determined.
For contracts as to which we are unable to estimate the final profitability except to assure that no loss will ultimately be
incurred, we recognize equal amounts of revenue and cost until the final results can be estimated more precisely. For these
deferred profit recognition contracts, we recognize revenue and cost equally and only recognize gross margin when probable
and reasonably estimable, which we generally determine to be when the contract is approximately 70% complete. We treat
long-term construction contracts that contain such a level of risk and uncertainty that estimation of the final outcome is
impractical, except to assure that no loss will be incurred, as deferred profit recognition contracts.
58
As of December 31, 2015, we have estimated the costs to complete all of our in-process contracts in order to estimate
revenues in accordance with the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. However, it is possible that current estimates
could change due to unforeseen events, which could result in adjustments to overall contract costs. The risk on fixed-priced
contracts is that revenue from the customer does not cover increases in our costs. It is possible that current estimates could
materially change for various reasons, including, but not limited to, fluctuations in forecasted labor productivity or steel and
other raw material prices. Increases in costs on our fixed-price contracts could have a material adverse impact on our
consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Alternatively, reductions in overall contract costs at
completion could materially improve our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Variations from
estimated contract performance could result in material adjustments to operating results for any fiscal quarter or year.
We recognize accrued claims in contract revenues for extra work or changes in scope of work to the extent of costs
incurred when we believe the following accounting criteria have been met:
a) The contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim; or a legal opinion has been obtained, stating
that under the circumstances there is a reasonable basis to support the claim.
b) Additional costs are caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and are not the result of
deficiencies in the contractor's performance.
c) Costs associated with the claim are identifiable or otherwise determinable and are reasonable in view of the
work performed.
d) The evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable, not based on management's feel for the situation
or on unsupported representations.
At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we recognized accrued claims totaling $2.3 million and $8.2 million,
respectively. In the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we recognized changes in estimates related to long-term
contracts accounted for on the percentage-of-completion basis, which are summarized as follows:
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
Increases in estimates for percentage-of-completion contracts
Decreases in estimates for percentage-of-completion contracts
Net changes in estimates for percentage-of-completion contracts
$
$
36,653 $
(36,235)
418 $
50,565 $
(24,234)
26,331 $
49,154
(40,315)
8,839
During 2015, a $12.9 million contract loss accrual associated with an updated forecast of the cost to complete a large
Global Services segment construction project that experienced unfavorable labor productivity and costs that have exceeded our
expectations was the primary driver of the decrease illustrated above. Additionally, In each of the past three years, we
recognized contract losses for additional estimated costs to complete our Global Power segment's Berlin Station project. This
project experienced unforeseen worksite conditions and fuel specification issues that caused schedule delays, resulting in us
filing suit against the customer in January 2014. The dispute was settled during the third quarter of 2015. The contract losses
reduced pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations by $9.6 million, $11.6 million and $35.6 million in the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Our policy is to account for fixed-price contracts under the completed-contract method if we believe that we are unable to
reasonably forecast cost to complete at start-up. Under the completed-contract method, income is recognized only when a
contract is completed or substantially complete.
For parts orders, certain industrial equipment and certain aftermarket services activities, we recognize revenues as goods
are delivered and work is performed.
59
The following represent the components of our contracts in progress and advance billings on contracts included in our
consolidated balance sheets:
(In thousands)
Included in contracts in progress:
Costs incurred less costs of revenue recognized
Revenues recognized less billings to customers
Contracts in progress
Included in advance billings on contracts:
Billings to customers less revenues recognized
Costs of revenue recognized less cost incurred
Advance billings on contracts
The following amounts represent retainages on contracts:
(In thousands)
Retainages expected to be collected within one year
Retainages expected to be collected after one year
Total retainages
December 31,
2015
2014
9,966 $
118,208
33,685
74,066
128,174 $
107,751
221,244 $
143,904
8,146
4,194
229,390 $
148,098
December 31,
2015
2014
24,906 $
5,329
30,235 $
19,978
7,360
27,338
$
$
$
$
$
$
We have included retainages expected to be collected in 2016 in accounts receivable – trade, net. Retainages expected to
be collected after one year are included in other assets. Of the long-term retainages at December 31, 2015, we anticipate
collecting $0 million in 2016, $3.9 million in 2017 and $1.2 million in 2018.
Comprehensive Income
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in stockholders' equity are as follows:
(In thousands)
Currency translation adjustments
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale investments
Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments
Unrecognized prior service cost on benefit obligations
December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
(19,493) $
(44)
11,551 $
(22)
1,786
(1,102)
(123)
(1,032)
38,409
(20)
627
(3,678)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(18,853) $
10,374 $
35,338
60
The amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component and the affected
consolidated statements of operations line items are as follows:
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income Component Recognized
Year ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
Line Item Presented
Realized (loss) gain on derivative financial instruments
$
546 $
(53) $
(285) Revenues
(In thousands)
155
(24)
677
(149)
528
Amortization of prior service cost on benefit obligations
(1,475)
Realized gains on investments
1,168
(307)
(42)
15
(27)
13
(6)
(46)
11
(35)
(457)
183
(274)
—
—
—
— Cost of operations
143 Other-net
(142) Total before tax
Provision for income
taxes
2
(140) Net income
(772) Cost of operations
281
Provision for income
taxes
(491) Net income
— Other-net
Provision for income
taxes
—
— Net income
Total reclassification for the period
$
194 $
(309) $
(631)
Warranty Expense
We accrue estimated expense included in cost of operations on our consolidated and combined statements of operations
to satisfy contractual warranty requirements when we recognize the associated revenues on the related contracts. In addition,
we record specific provisions or reductions where we expect the actual warranty costs to significantly differ from the accrued
estimates. Such changes could have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
The following summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of accrued warranty expense:
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Additions
Acquisition of MEGTEC
Expirations and other changes
Payments
Translation and other
Balance at end of period
Research and Development
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
37,735 $
19,310
38,968 $
13,726
—
(982)
(15,215)
(1,001)
4,693
(4,052)
(14,787)
(813)
58,339
16,468
—
(15,728)
(20,185)
74
$
39,847 $
37,735 $
38,968
Our research and development activities are related to the development and improvement of new and existing products,
services and equipment. Research and development activities totaled $16.5 million, $18.5 million, and $21.0 million in the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
61
In the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a $14.6 million impairment charge primarily related to
research and development facilities and equipment dedicated to a carbon capture process that was determined not to be
commercially viable and other equipment primarily related to pilot testing capabilities that are no longer viable for current or
future research and development efforts. The impairment is included in losses on asset disposals and impairments in the
consolidated and combined statements of operations.
Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefits
We sponsor various defined benefit pension and postretirement plans covering certain employees of our United States and
international subsidiaries. We utilize actuarial valuations to calculate the cost and benefit obligations of our pension and
postretirement benefits. The actuarial valuations utilize significant assumptions in the determination of our benefit cost and
obligations, including assumptions regarding discount rates, expected returns on plan assets, mortality and health care cost
trends.
We determine our discount rate based on a review of published financial data and discussions with our actuary regarding
rates of return on high-quality, fixed-income investments currently available and expected to be available during the period to
maturity of our pension and postretirement plan obligations. For 2016, we will change our approach to setting the discount rate
from a single equivalent discount rate to an alternative spot rate method. This change in estimate will be applied prospectively
in developing our annual discount rate, which will result in a lower interest and service cost in 2016. The impact of the change
in estimate did not change our pension and other postretirement benefits liability as of December 31, 2015, because any change
is completely offset in the net actuarial gain (loss) recorded in the annual mark to market adjustment. This new method was
adopted because it more accurately applies each year’s spot rates to the projected cash flows.
In 2014, we adjusted our mortality assumption to reflect mortality improvements identified by the Society of Actuaries,
adjusted for our experience. The impact of the change in this assumption caused a $46.9 million increase in our pension
liability. The expected rate of return on plan assets assumption is based on capital market assumptions of the long-term
expected returns for the investment mix of assets currently in the portfolio. The expected rate of return on plan assets is
determined to be the weighted average of the nominal returns based on the weightings of the classes within the total asset
portfolio. Expected health care cost trends represent expected annual rates of change in the cost of health care benefits and are
estimated based on analysis of health care cost inflation. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we adjusted the
mortality assumption for our domestic plans to reflect mortality improvements identified by the Society of Actuaries, adjusted
for our experience.
The components of benefit cost related to service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets and prior service cost
amortization are recorded on a quarterly basis based on actuarial assumptions. In the fourth quarter of each year, or as interim
remeasurements are required, we recognize net actuarial gains and losses into earnings as a component of net periodic benefit
cost (mark to market adjustment). Recognized net actuarial gains and losses consist primarily of our reported actuarial gains
and losses and the difference between the actual return on plan assets and the expected return on plan assets.
We recognize the funded status of each plan as either an asset or a liability in the consolidated and combined balance
sheets. The funded status is the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the present value of its benefit obligation,
determined on a plan-by-plan basis. See Note 8 for a detailed description of our plan assets.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense for federal, foreign, state and local income taxes are calculated on pre-tax income based on current
tax law and includes the cumulative effect of any changes in tax rates from those used previously in determining deferred tax
assets and liabilities. Before the spin-off, we were included in the consolidated United States federal and certain
consolidated/combined state tax returns filed by BWC. After the spin-off, we file our own federal and state income tax returns.
Both prior to and after the spin-off, our foreign subsidiaries operate and file tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. For
both the pre-spin and post-spin periods, we compute the provision for income taxes on a separate tax return basis as if we filed
our own tax returns. For the pre-spin period, we deem the amounts that we would have paid or received from the United States
62
Internal Revenue Service and certain state jurisdictions had we not been a member of BWC's consolidated tax group to be
immediately settled with BWC.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. We assess deferred taxes and the adequacy of the valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. In the ordinary course of
business there is inherent uncertainty in quantifying our income tax positions. We assess our income tax positions and record
tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon management's evaluation of the facts, circumstances and
information available at the reporting date. For those tax positions where it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will be
sustained, we have recorded the largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income tax positions
where it is not more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in the financial
statements. We record interest and penalties (net of any applicable tax benefit) related to income taxes as a component of
provision for income taxes on our consolidated and combined statements of operations.
Inventories
We carry our inventories at the lower of cost or market. We determine cost principally on the first-in, first-out basis,
except for certain materials inventories of our Global Services segment, for which we use the last-in, first-out ("LIFO")
method. We determined the cost of approximately 20% and 18% of our total inventories using the LIFO method at
December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and our total LIFO reserve at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was approximately $7.7
million and $7.9 million, respectively. The components of inventories are summarized below:
(In thousands)
Raw materials and supplies
Work in progress
Finished goods
Total inventories
Property, Plant and Equipment
December 31,
2015
2014
$
$
68,684 $
7,025
14,410
90,119 $
71,604
9,831
17,276
98,711
We carry our property, plant and equipment at depreciated cost, less any impairment provisions. We depreciate our
property, plant and equipment using the straight-line method over estimated economic useful lives of eight to 33 years for
buildings and three to 28 years for machinery and equipment. Our depreciation expense was $23.5 million, $22.3 million and
$18.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We expense the costs of maintenance,
repairs and renewals that do not materially prolong the useful life of an asset as we incur them.
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost and is set forth below:
(In thousands)
Land
Buildings
Machinery and equipment
Property under construction
Less accumulated depreciation
Net property, plant and equipment
December 31,
2015
2014
$
7,460 $
104,963
181,064
36,534
330,021
184,304
$
145,717 $
6,937
114,088
201,912
12,824
335,761
200,524
135,237
63
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
We use the equity method of accounting for affiliates in which we are able to exert significant influence. Currently,
substantially all of our material investments in affiliates that are not consolidated are recorded using the equity method.
Affiliates in which our investment ownership is less than 20% and where we are unable to exert significant influence are
carried at cost.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of our acquired businesses over the fair value of the net assets acquired. We
perform testing of goodwill for impairment annually. We may elect to perform a qualitative test when we believe that there is
sufficient excess fair value over carrying value based on our most recent quantitative assessment, adjusted for relevant events
and circumstances that could affect fair value during the current year. If we conclude based on this assessment that it is more
likely than not that the reporting unit is not impaired, we do not perform a quantitative impairment test. In all other
circumstances, we utilize a two-step quantitative impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the
amount of any goodwill impairment. The first step of the test compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying
amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill
impairment test is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair
value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill.
The following summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill:
(In thousands)
Global
Power
Global
Services
Industrial
Environmental
Balance at December 31, 2013
Goodwill resulting from acquisition of MEGTEC (Note 3)
$
38,921 $
—
65,709 $
—
— $
108,800
(930)
37,991
—
(1,076)
(3,223)
62,486
—
(2,640)
108,800
(4,492)
—
$
36,915 $
59,846 $
104,308 $
201,069
Total
104,630
108,800
(4,153)
209,277
(4,492)
(3,716)
Currency translation adjustments
Balance at December 31, 2014
Purchase price adjustment related to MEGTEC acquisition
Currency translation adjustments
Balance at December 31, 2015
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are recognized at fair value when acquired. Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized to
operating expense using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are
not amortized and are subject to annual impairment testing. We may elect to perform a qualitative assessment when testing
indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment to determine whether events or circumstances affecting significant inputs
related to the most recent quantitative evaluation have occurred, indicating that it is more likely than not that the indefinite
lived intangible asset is impaired. Otherwise, we test indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment by quantitatively
determining the fair value of the indefinite lived intangible asset and comparing the fair value of the intangible asset to its
carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, we recognize impairment for the amount
of the difference.
64
Our intangible assets are as follows:
(In thousands)
Definite-lived intangible assets:
Customer relationships
Unpatented technology
Patented technology
Tradename
Acquired backlog
All other
Gross value of definite-lived intangible assets
Customer relationships
Unpatented technology
Patented technology
Tradename
Acquired backlog
All other
Accumulated amortization
Net definite-lived intangible assets
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks and trade names
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
$
$
$
$
35,729 $
4,033
2,532
9,909
10,400
7,504
70,107
(12,509) $
(1,471)
(1,406)
(2,883)
(10,400)
(4,899)
(33,568)
36,539 $
1,305
1,305 $
36,749
4,072
2,521
9,957
10,600
7,565
71,464
(8,775)
(582)
(1,122)
(1,984)
(5,300)
(4,360)
(22,123)
49,341
1,305
1,305
The following summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets:
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Business acquisitions and adjustments
Amortization expense
Impairment charge
Currency translation adjustments and other
Balance at end of period
$
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
50,646 $
500
(11,445)
—
(1,857)
18,246
44,972
(9,880)
(1,730)
(962)
$
37,844 $
50,646
Estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,
Amount
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
$
$
$
$
$
5,944
5,822
5,549
5,195
4,176
65
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Our cash equivalents are highly liquid investments, with maturities of three months or less when we purchase them.
We record cash and cash equivalents as restricted when we are unable to freely use such cash and cash equivalents for our
general operating purposes. At December 31, 2015, we had restricted cash and cash equivalents totaling $37.1 million, $3.7
million of which was held in restricted foreign cash accounts and $33.4 million of which was held to meet reinsurance reserve
requirements of our captive insurer.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we paid the following amounts for income taxes:
(In thousands)
Income taxes (net of refunds)
2015
2014
2013
$
15,008 $
7,951 $
21,929
During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we recognized the following non-cash activity in our
consolidated and combined financial statements:
(In thousands)
2015
2014
2013
Accrued capital expenditures included in accounts payable
$
568 $
1,680 $
2,607
Derivative Financial Instruments
Our global operations expose us to changes in foreign currency exchange ("FX") rates. We use derivative financial
instruments, primarily FX forward contracts, to reduce the impact of changes in FX rates on our operating results. We use these
instruments primarily to hedge our exposure associated with revenues or costs on our long-term contracts that are denominated
in currencies other than our operating entities' functional currencies. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments
for trading or other speculative purposes.
We enter into derivative financial instruments primarily as hedges of certain firm purchase and sale commitments
denominated in foreign currencies. We record these contracts at fair value on our consolidated and combined balance sheets and
defer the related gains and losses in stockholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Any ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value and any portion
excluded from the assessment of effectiveness is immediately recognized in other – net on our consolidated and combined
statements of operations. The gain or loss on a derivative instrument not designated as a hedging instrument is also immediately
recognized in earnings. Gains and losses on derivative financial instruments that require immediate recognition are included as
a component of other – net in our consolidated and combined statements of operations.
Self-Insurance
We have a wholly owned insurance subsidiary that provides employer's liability, general and automotive liability and
workers' compensation insurance and, from time to time, builder's risk insurance (within certain limits) to our companies. We
may also, in the future, have this insurance subsidiary accept other risks that we cannot or do not wish to transfer to outside
insurance companies. Included in other liabilities on our consolidated and combined balance sheets are reserves for self-
insurance totaling $24.1 million and $25.3 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Loss Contingencies
We estimate liabilities for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss
is reasonably estimable. We provide disclosure when there is a reasonable possibility that the ultimate loss will exceed the
recorded provision or if such probable loss is not reasonably estimable. We are currently involved in some significant litigation,
as discussed in Note 10. Our losses are typically resolved over long periods of time and are often difficult to assess and
estimate due to, among other reasons, the possibility of multiple actions by third parties; the attribution of damages, if any,
among multiple defendants; plaintiffs, in most cases involving personal injury claims, do not specify the amount of damages
claimed; the discovery process may take multiple years to complete; during the litigation process, it is common to have
66
multiple complex unresolved procedural and substantive issues; the potential availability of insurance and indemnity
coverages; the wide-ranging outcomes reached in similar cases, including the variety of damages awarded; the likelihood of
settlements for de minimus amounts prior to trial; the likelihood of success at trial; and the likelihood of success on appeal.
Consequently, it is possible future earnings could be affected by changes in our assessments of the probability that a loss has
been incurred in a material pending litigation against us and/or changes in our estimates related to such matters.
Stock-Based Compensation
We expense stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Topic
Compensation – Stock Compensation. Under this topic, the fair value of equity-classified awards, such as restricted stock,
performance shares and stock options, is determined on the date of grant and is not remeasured. The fair value of liability-
classified awards, such as cash-settled stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units and performance units, is determined on
the date of grant and is remeasured at the end of each reporting period through the date of settlement. Grant date fair values for
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units are determined using the closing price of our
common stock on the date of grant. Grant date fair values for stock options and stock appreciation rights are determined using a
Black-Scholes option-pricing model ("Black-Scholes"). For performance shares or units granted in the year ended
December 31, 2015 that contain a Relative Total Shareholder Return vesting criteria, we utilize a Monte Carlo simulation to
determine the grant date fair value, which determines the probability of satisfying the market condition included in the award.
The determination of the fair value of a share-based payment award using an option-pricing model requires the input of
significant assumptions, such as the expected life of the award and stock price volatility.
Under the provisions of this FASB topic, we recognize expense, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, for all share-based
awards granted on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally equivalent to the
vesting term. This topic requires compensation expense to be recognized, net of an estimate for forfeitures, such that
compensation expense is recorded only for those awards expected to vest. We review the estimate for forfeitures periodically
and record any adjustments deemed necessary for each reporting period. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from
our estimate, the stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what we have recorded in the current
period.
Additionally, this FASB topic amended FASB Topic Statement of Cash Flows, to require excess tax benefits to be
reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as a reduction of taxes paid. These excess tax benefits result from tax deductions
in excess of the cumulative compensation expense recognized for options exercised and other equity-classified awards.
See Note 10 for a further discussion of stock-based compensation.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of
Debt Issuance Costs. This ASU requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the
balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This revised
guidance is effective retrospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and related interim
periods with early adoption permitted. In August 2015, ASU No. 2015-03 was updated by ASU No. 2015-15, Imputation of
Interest. ASU No. 2015-15 adds paragraphs pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Announcement
permitting companies to continue to record debt issuance costs associated with a line-of-credit as an asset. This ASU was
effective upon issuance. We have elected to early adopt these standards and debt issuance costs related to our Credit Facility
are included in other assets on the consolidated and combined balance sheets.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The ASU
required companies to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current on the balance sheet instead of separating
deferred taxes into current and non-current amounts. Because early adoption is permitted, we adopted the standard upon
issuance and have prospectively reflected the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current in our December 31,
2015 consolidated balance sheet. Deferred taxes on our December 31, 2014 consolidated balance sheet have not been
reclassified to conform with the 2015 presentation of deferred tax balances.
67
New Accounting Standards
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40):
Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement. The objective of this ASU is to help entities evaluate
the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement by providing guidance as to whether an
arrangement includes the sale or license of software. This update is effective prospectively for annual periods, including interim
periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015 with early adoption permitted. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The ASU outlines the
principles companies must apply to measure and recognize revenue and the corresponding cash flows it expects to be entitled to
for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The update becomes effective for reporting periods (interim and
annual) beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.
NOTE 3 – BUSINESS ACQUISITION
MEGTEC Acquisition
On June 20, 2014, we acquired the outstanding stock of industrial processes solutions provider MEGTEC for $142.8
million, net of cash acquired. MEGTEC designs, engineers, manufactures and services air pollution control systems and
coating/drying equipment for a variety of industrial applications. The purchase price of the acquisition has been allocated
among assets acquired and liabilities assumed at estimates of fair value with the excess purchase price recorded as goodwill.
Our purchase price allocation, finalized in the second quarter of 2015, is as follows:
(In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Other current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill
Intangible assets
Total assets acquired
Accounts payable
Advance billings on contracts
Other current liabilities
Pension liability
Deferred income taxes
Other liabilities
Total liabilities assumed
Net assets acquired
Cash and cash equivalents acquired
Net assets acquired, net of unrestricted cash acquired
Amount of tax deductible goodwill
68
MEGTEC
14,232
23,054
5,395
6,326
13,348
104,308
43,150
209,813
13,402
11,144
18,089
5,041
4,994
130
52,800
157,013
14,232
142,781
34,583
$
$
The intangible assets included above consist of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
(In thousands)
Customer relationships
Backlog
Trade names / trademarks
Developed technology
Amount
Amortization Period
$
$
$
$
23,500
10,400
6,000
3,250
8 years
1 year
11 years
5 years
Our consolidated and combined financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes $105.4 million of
revenues and $3.3 million of net income related to MEGTEC operations occurring from the acquisition date to December 31,
2014. Additionally, the following unaudited pro forma financial information presents our results of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 had the acquisition of MEGTEC occurred on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma
financial information below is not intended to represent or be indicative of our actual consolidated results had we completed the
acquisition at January 1, 2013. This information is presented for comparative purposes only and should not be taken as
representative of our future consolidated and combined results of operations.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Revenues
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
Basic Earnings per Common Share
Diluted Earnings per Common Share
Twelve months ended
December 31, 2014
Twelve months ended
December 31, 2013
$
$
$
$
1,566,361 $
(19,559) $
(0.36) $
(0.36) $
1,944,040
170,221
3.04
3.02
The unaudited pro forma results include the following pre-tax adjustments to the historical results presented above:
•
•
•
Increase (decrease) in amortization expense related to timing of amortization of the fair value of identifiable
intangible assets acquired of approximately $(3.9) million and $12.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2014
and 2013, respectively.
Elimination of historical interest expense of approximately $0.9 million and $2.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Elimination of $13.4 million in acquisition related costs recognized in the year ended December 31, 2014 that are not
expected to be recurring.
NOTE 4 – EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
We have investments in entities that we account for using the equity method. Our equity method investees include joint
ventures in China and India, each of which manufactures boiler parts, and a joint venture in Australia that sells and services
industrial equipment and other project-related joint ventures. In the year ended December 31, 2014, we purchased the
remaining outstanding equity of a coal-fired power plant that was previously an equity method investee. Additionally, in the
year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we recognized income from a United States environmental project joint venture. The
United States environmental project was substantially completed in 2014 and did not contribute equity income in 2015.
69
The undistributed earnings of our equity method investees were $63.4 million and $76.0 million at December 31, 2015
and 2014, respectively. Summarized below is consolidated and combined balance sheet and statement of operations information
for investments accounted for under the equity method:
(In thousands)
Current assets
Noncurrent assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Owners' equity
Total liabilities and equity
(In thousands)
Revenues
Gross profit
Income before provision for income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net income
December 31,
2015
2014
$
446,283 $
168,411
614,694
314,390
140,349
159,955
$
614,694 $
528,950
181,517
710,467
403,484
97,419
209,564
710,467
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
$
475,459 $
69,021
645,481 $
85,378
3,072
4,500
22,909
6,159
(1,428) $
16,750 $
592,755
97,226
39,033
8,603
30,430
Our investment in equity method investees was $5.8 million more than our underlying equity in net assets of those
investees based on stated ownership percentages at December 31, 2015. These differences were primarily related to the timing
of distribution of dividends and various adjustments under GAAP. The following table summarizes the investments in
unconsolidated entities by segment reflected in our consolidated and combined balance sheets:
(In thousands)
Global Power
Global Services
Total investment in unconsolidated affiliates
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
$
75,946 $
16,250
93,389 $
15,859
99,013
45,462
92,196 $
109,248 $
144,475
The provision for income taxes is based on the tax laws and rates in the countries in which our investees operate. The
taxation regimes vary not only by their nominal rates, but also by the allowability of deductions, credits and other benefits. For
some of our United States investees, United States income taxes are the responsibility of the respective owners, which is
primarily the reason for the provision for income taxes being low in relation to income before provision for income taxes.
Reconciliation of net income in the statement of operations of our investees to equity in income of investees in our
consolidated and combined statements of operations is as follows:
(In thousands)
Equity income based on stated ownership percentages
All other adjustments due to amortization of basis differences, timing of
GAAP adjustments and other adjustments
Equity in income of investees
$
$
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
(542) $
8,563 $
15,280
300
118
(242) $
8,681 $
3,107
18,387
70
Our transactions with unconsolidated affiliates were as follows:
(In thousands)
Sales to
Purchases from
Dividends received
Capital contributions, net of returns
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
18,014 $
45,397
20,830
7,424
70,566 $
5,623
17,407
4,900
70,793
4,646
20,382
6,884
Our accounts receivable-other includes receivables from these unconsolidated affiliates of $7.9 million and $7.0 million
at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively.
NOTE 5 – RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES AND SPIN-OFF TRANSACTION COSTS
Restructuring Activities
Previously announced restructuring initiatives intended to better position us for growth and profitability have primarily
included facility consolidation and reductions in the number of our employees. An analysis of the change in our restructuring
liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:
(In thousands)
Liability balance at the beginning of the period
Special charges for restructuring activities(1)
Payments
Liability balance at the end of the period
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
$
$
5,086 $
5,014
(9,360)
740 $
5,601
13,146
(13,661)
5,086
(1) Excludes non-cash charges related to accelerated depreciation and impairment charges of $6.7 million and $7.0 million
for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which did not impact the restructuring liability.
At December 31, 2015, unpaid restructuring charges totaled $0.4 million for employee termination benefits and $0.3
million related to consulting and administrative costs.
Spin-off Transaction Costs
We incurred $3.3 million of costs in the year ended December 31, 2015 directly related to the spin-off from BWC. The
costs were primarily attributable to stock-based compensation, and are included in restructuring activities and spin-off
transaction costs in the consolidated and combined statements of operations.
NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax and income tax of multiple state and international jurisdictions. Before the
spin-off transaction, we were included in the consolidated United States federal and certain consolidated/combined state tax
returns filed by our former Parent. After the spin-off transaction, we file our own federal and state income tax returns. Both
prior to and after the spin-off, our foreign subsidiaries operate and file tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. For both the
pre-spin and post-spin periods, we compute the provision for income taxes on a separate tax return basis as if we filed our own
tax returns. For the pre-spin period, we deem the amounts that we would have paid to or received from the United States
Internal Revenue Service and certain state jurisdictions had we not been a member of BWC's consolidated tax group to be
immediately settled with BWC. We entered into a tax sharing agreement with BWC in connection with the spin-off that
allocates the responsibility for prior period taxes of BWC consolidated tax reporting group between us and BWC and its
subsidiaries. However, if BWC were unable to pay, we could be required to pay the entire amount of such taxes.
71
We provide for income taxes based on the tax laws and rates in the jurisdictions in which we conduct our operations.
These jurisdictions may have regimes of taxation that vary with respect to both nominal rates and the basis on which these rates
are applied. This variation, along with the changes in our mix of income within these jurisdictions, can contribute to shifts in
our effective tax rate from period to period.
We are currently under audit by various state and international authorities. With few exceptions, we do not have any
returns under examination for years prior to 2010. The United States Internal Revenue Service has completed its examination
of the 2010 through 2012 federal tax returns of BWC, and all matters arising from such examination have been resolved.
We apply the provisions of FASB Topic Income Taxes regarding the treatment of uncertain tax positions. A reconciliation
of unrecognized tax benefits follows:
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Increases based on tax positions taken in the current year
Increases based on tax positions taken in the prior years
Decreases based on tax positions taken in the prior years
Decreases due to settlements with tax authorities
Decreases due to lapse of applicable statute of limitation
$
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
3,321 $
88
248
(1,161)
(1,355)
—
1,190 $
213
2,268
—
(350)
—
1,204
—
276
(290)
—
—
Balance at end of period
$
1,141 $
3,321 $
1,190
All of the $1.1 million balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015 would reduce our effective tax rate if
recognized.
We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our provision for income taxes. During the
year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded a decrease in our accruals of less than $0.1 million, resulting in recorded liabilities
of approximately $0.3 million for the payment of tax-related interest and penalties. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, our
recorded liabilities for the payment of tax-related interest and penalties totaled approximately $0.3 million and $0.1 million,
respectively.
It is unlikely that our previously unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly in the next twelve months.
72
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the financial and tax bases of assets
and liabilities. Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Pension liability
Accrued warranty expense
Accrued vacation pay
Accrued liabilities for self-insurance (including postretirement health care benefits)
Accrued liabilities for executive and employee incentive compensation
Investments in joint ventures and affiliated companies
Long-term contracts
Net operating loss carryforward
State tax net operating loss carryforward
Foreign tax credit carryforward
Other
Total deferred tax assets
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
Net, total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment
Long-term contracts
Intangibles
Undistributed foreign earnings
Goodwill
Other
Total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax assets
December 31,
2015
2014
$
107,748 $
12,589
4,482
14,280
14,255
14,100
6,963
13,544
14,409
2,378
9,206
97,447
10,700
4,635
17,979
3,582
7,472
6,622
13,044
14,617
2,959
11,272
213,954
(10,077)
203,877
190,329
(9,216)
181,113
3,379
9,084
13,158
1,000
1,167
1,317
29,105
$
174,772 $
6,136
17,932
8,484
500
5,696
3,200
41,948
139,165
At December 31, 2015, we had a valuation allowance of $10.1 million for deferred tax assets, which we expect may not
be realized through carrybacks, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and our estimate of future taxable
income. We believe that our remaining deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable through carrybacks, future
reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and our estimate of future taxable income. Any changes to our estimated
valuation allowance could be material to our consolidated and combined financial statements. The following is an analysis of
our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets:
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2015
Year Ended December 31, 2014
Year Ended December 31, 2013
Beginning
Balance
Charges To
Costs and
Expenses
Charged To
Other
Accounts
Ending
Balance
$
(9,216)
(6,980)
(9,709)
(861)
(2,236)
—
— $
—
2,729
(10,077)
(9,216)
(6,980)
73
We operate in numerous countries that have statutory tax rates below that of the United States federal statutory rate of
35%. The most significant of these foreign operations are located in Canada, Denmark and the United Kingdom with tax rates
of approximately 27%, 24% and 20%, respectively. Income before provision for income taxes was as follows:
(In thousands)
U.S.
Other than U.S.
Income before provision for income taxes
The provision for income taxes consisted of
(In thousands)
Current:
U.S. – federal
U.S. – state and local
Other than U.S.
Total current
Deferred:
U.S. – Federal
U.S. – State and local
Other than U.S.
Total deferred (benefit) provision
Provision for income taxes
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
$
(20,748) $
40,953
(64,084) $
27,466
20,205 $
(36,618) $
135,966
76,523
212,489
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
24,084 $
1,834 $
3,458
8,250
35,792
(35,888)
(111)
3,878
(32,121)
1,544
13,917
17,295
(32,910)
(572)
(8,541)
(42,023)
$
3,671 $
(24,728) $
21,956
3,053
(9,105)
15,904
26,648
3,354
26,105
56,107
72,011
The following is a reconciliation of the U.S. statutory federal tax rate (35%) to the consolidated effective tax rate:
U.S. federal statutory (benefit) rate
State and local income taxes
Foreign rate differential
Tax credits
Dividends and deemed dividends from affiliates
Valuation allowances
Uncertain tax positions
Non-deductible expenses
Manufacturing deduction
Other
Effective tax rate
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
35.0%
13.8
(13.1)
(14.7)
1.7
4.3
(6.6)
2.4
(2.5)
(2.1)
35.0%
4.1
16.6
7.5
5.7
(6.1)
(6.7)
(2.4)
11.6
2.2
35.0%
3.9
(3.0)
(4.0)
3.3
(1.3)
0.1
0.5
(0.4)
(0.2)
18.2%
67.5%
33.9%
We have foreign net operating loss benefits after tax of $12.8 million available to offset future taxable income in foreign
jurisdictions. Of the foreign net operating loss benefits, $0.5 million is scheduled to expire in 2017 to 2020. The remaining net
operating loss benefits have unlimited lives. We are carrying a valuation allowance of $0.3 million against the deferred tax asset
related to the foreign loss carryforwards.
We have foreign tax credit carryovers of $2.4 million, which will not expire until 2018. We have state net operating loss
benefits after tax of $14.4 million available to offset future taxable income in various states. Our state net operating loss
74
carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2016. We are carrying a valuation allowance of $9.8 million against the deferred tax
asset related to the state loss carryforwards.
We would be subject to withholding taxes if we were to distribute earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries. For the year
ended December 31, 2015, the undistributed earnings of these subsidiaries were $396.4 million. Unrecognized deferred income
tax liabilities, including withholding taxes, of approximately $59.7 million would be payable upon distribution of these
earnings. We have provided tax of $1.0 million on earnings we intend to remit. All other earnings are considered permanently
reinvested.
NOTE 7 – CREDIT FACILITIES
Short-Term Line of Credit
Our short-term line of credit represents borrowings by one of our subsidiaries. The short-term line of credit balance was
$2.0 million and $3.2 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. This facility is renewable annually and the interest
rate associated with this line of credit was 5.1% and 6.3% per annum at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Credit Agreement
The new credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") that we entered into on May 11, 2015 closed in connection with the spin-
off transaction. The Credit Agreement provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to
$600 million, which is scheduled to mature on June 30, 2020. The proceeds of loans under the Credit Agreement are available
for working capital needs and other general corporate purposes, and the full amount is available for the issuance of letters of
credit.
The Credit Agreement contains an accordion feature that allows us, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions,
including the receipt of increased commitments from existing lenders or new commitments from new lenders, to increase the
amount of the commitments under the revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed the sum of (i) $200 million
plus (ii) an unlimited amount, so long as for any commitment increase under this subclause (ii) our senior secured leverage
ratio (assuming the full amount of any commitment increase under this subclause (ii) is drawn) is equal to or less than 2.0 to 1.0
after giving pro forma effect thereto.
The Credit Agreement and our obligations under certain hedging agreements and cash management agreements with our
lenders and their affiliates are (i) guaranteed by substantially all of our wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, but excluding our
captive insurance subsidiary, and (ii) secured by first-priority liens on certain assets owned by us and the guarantors. The Credit
Agreement requires interest payments on revolving loans on a periodic basis until maturity. We may prepay all loans at any
time without premium or penalty (other than customary LIBOR breakage costs), subject to notice requirements. The Credit
Agreement requires us to make certain prepayments on any outstanding revolving loans after receipt of cash proceeds from
certain asset sales or other events, subject to certain exceptions and a right to reinvest such proceeds in certain circumstances,
but such prepayments will not require us to reduce the commitments under the Credit Agreement.
Loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement bear interest at our option at either the LIBOR rate plus a margin ranging
from 1.375% to 1.875% per year or the base rate (the highest of the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, the one month LIBOR rate
plus 1.0% and the administrative agent's prime rate) plus a margin ranging from 0.375% to 0.875% per year. A commitment
fee is charged on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, and that fee varies between 0.25% and 0.35% per year.
Additionally, a letter of credit fee of between 1.375% and 1.875% per year is charged with respect to the amount of each
financial letter of credit issued, and a letter of credit fee of between 0.825% and 1.125% per year is charged with respect to the
amount of each performance letter of credit issued. The applicable rates for loans, the commitment fee and the letter of credit
fees set forth above vary quarterly based on our leverage ratio. The applicable margin for loans, the commitment fee and the
letter of credit fees set forth above vary quarterly based on our leverage ratio. Based on our leverage ratio at December 31,
2015, the applicable margin for LIBOR and base rate loans was 1.375% and 0.375%, respectively. The commitment fee for the
unused portions of the revolving credit facility was 0.25% and the letter of credit fees for financial and performance letters of
credit was 1.375% and 0.825%, respectively.
75
The Credit Agreement includes financial covenants that are tested on a quarterly basis, based on the rolling four-quarter
period that ends on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The maximum permitted leverage ratio is 3.00 to 1.00, which ratio may
be increased to 3.25 to 1.00 for up to four consecutive fiscal quarters after a material acquisition. The minimum consolidated
interest coverage ratio is 4.00 to 1.00. In addition, the Credit Agreement contains various restrictive covenants, including with
respect to debt, liens, investments, mergers, acquisitions, dividends, equity repurchases and asset sales. At December 31, 2015,
we had no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility, and after giving effect to the leverage ratio and $109.6
million of letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement, we had approximately $373 million available for borrowings or
to meet letter of credit requirements.
The Credit Agreement generally includes customary events of default for a secured credit facility. If an event of default
relating to bankruptcy or other insolvency events with respect to us occurs under the Credit Agreement, all obligations will
immediately become due and payable. If any other event of default exists, the lenders will be permitted to accelerate the
maturity of the obligations outstanding. If any event of default occurs, the lenders are permitted to terminate their commitments
thereunder and exercise other rights and remedies, including the commencement of foreclosure or other actions against the
collateral. Additionally, if we are unable to make any of the representations and warranties in the Credit Agreement, we will be
unable to borrow funds or have letters of credit issued. At December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all of the
covenants set forth in the Credit Agreement.
Other Credit Arrangements
Certain subsidiaries have credit arrangements with various commercial banks and other financial institutions for the
issuance of letters of credit and bank guarantees in association with contracting activity. The aggregate value of all such letters
of credit and bank guarantees as of December 31, 2015 was $193.1 million.
We have posted surety bonds to support contractual obligations to customers relating to certain projects. We utilize
bonding facilities to support such obligations, but the issuance of bonds under those facilities is typically at the surety's
discretion. Although there can be no assurance that we will maintain our surety bonding capacity, we believe our current
capacity is more than adequate to support our existing project requirements for the next twelve months. In addition, these bonds
generally indemnify customers should we fail to perform our obligations under the applicable contracts. We, and certain of our
subsidiaries, have jointly executed general agreements of indemnity in favor of surety underwriters relating to surety bonds
those underwriters issue in support of some of our contracting activity. As of December 31, 2015, bonds issued and outstanding
under these arrangements in support of contracts totaled approximately $541.7 million.
NOTE 8 – PENSION PLANS AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
We have historically provided defined benefit retirement benefits to domestic employees under the Retirement Plan for
Employees of Babcock & Wilcox Commercial Operations (the "Company Plan"), a noncontributory plan. As of 2006, the
Company Plan was closed to new salaried plan entrants. In October 2012, we notified employees that, effective December 31,
2015, benefit accruals for those salaried employees covered by, and continuing to accrue service and salary adjusted benefits
under the Company Plan will cease. Furthermore, effective January 1, 2016, we will make service-based, cash contributions to
a defined contribution plan for those employees impacted by the plan freeze.
Effective January 1, 2012, a defined contribution component was adopted applicable to Babcock & Wilcox Canada, Ltd.
(the "Canadian Plans"). Any employee with less than two years of continuous service as of December 31, 2011 was required to
enroll in the defined contribution component of the Canadian Plans as of January 1, 2012 or upon the completion of 6 months
of continuous service, whichever is later. These and future employees will not be eligible to enroll in the defined benefit
component of the Canadian Plans. Additionally, during the third quarter of 2014, benefit accruals under certain hourly Canadian
pension plans were ceased with an effective date of January 1, 2015. This amendment to the Canadian Plans is reflected as a
curtailment in 2014. As part of the spin-off transaction, we are splitting the Canadian defined benefit plans from BWC, but as
of December 31, 2015, that split is not complete. We have not presented these plans as multi-employer plans because our
portion is separately identifiable and we were able to assess the assets, liabilities and periodic expense in the same manner as if
it were a separate plan in each period.
76
We do not provide retirement benefits to certain non-resident alien employees of foreign subsidiaries. Retirement benefits
for salaried employees who accrue benefits in a defined benefit plan are based on final average compensation and years of
service, while benefits for hourly paid employees are based on a flat benefit rate and years of service. Our funding policy is to
fund the plans as recommended by the respective plan actuaries and in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended, or other applicable law. Funding provisions under the Pension Protection Act accelerate
funding requirements to ensure full funding of benefits accrued.
We make available other benefits which include postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain salaried
and union retirees based on their union contracts, and on a limited basis, to future retirees.
77
Obligations and Funded Status
(In thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Pension Benefits
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2015
Other Postretirement Benefits
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2015
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
$
1,253,278 $
1,099,717 $
34,909 $
36,422
Service cost
Interest cost
Plan participants’ contributions
Curtailments
Settlements
Transfers /Acquisition
Amendments
Actuarial loss (gain)
Loss (gain) due to transfer
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
Benefits paid
Benefit obligation at end of period
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contribution
Plan participants' contributions
Settlements
Transfers
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at the end of period
Funded status
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of:
Accrued employee benefits
$
$
$
$
13,677
49,501
156
—
—
15,992
244
(47,098)
(523)
(11,450)
(68,614)
13,558
51,181
175
(146)
(2,170)
4,426
—
156,058
—
(5,575)
(63,946)
24
1,143
276
—
—
234
—
(296)
—
(367)
(4,034)
1,205,163 $
1,253,278 $
31,889 $
999,515 $
935,652 $
— $
(19,623)
124,934
8,711
156
—
13,974
(11,089)
(68,614)
923,030
8,452
175
(2,168)
(178)
(3,406)
(63,946)
999,515
—
3,757
276
—
—
—
(4,034)
—
18
1,087
777
—
—
—
—
1,804
—
(592)
(4,607)
34,909
—
—
3,830
777
—
—
—
(4,607)
—
(282,133) $
(253,763) $
(31,889) $
(34,909)
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
—
—
(27,269)
Pension liability
Prepaid pension
(281,711)
(253,664)
1,505
1,170
—
—
(1,927) $
(1,269) $
(4,620) $
Accrued benefit liability, net
$
(282,133) $
(253,763) $
(31,889) $
(34,909)
Amount recognized in accumulated comprehensive income (before taxes):
Prior service cost (credit)
Supplemental information:
$
1,976 $
2,131 $
— $
Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets
Projected benefit obligation
Accumulated benefit obligation
Fair value of plan assets
$
$
$
1,175,511 $
1,235,100 $
— $
1,172,591 $
1,228,085 $
31,889 $
34,909
891,873 $
979,834 $
— $
Plans with plan assets in excess of accumulated benefit obligation
Projected benefit obligation
Accumulated benefit obligation
Fair value of plan assets
$
$
$
29,652 $
29,652 $
31,157 $
18,178 $
17,178 $
19,681 $
— $
— $
— $
78
(4,856)
(30,053)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Pension Benefits
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2015
Other Postretirement Benefits
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2015
(In thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost
Interest cost
$
13,677 $
13,558 $
15,287 $
24 $
18 $
49,501
51,181
46,266
1,143
1,087
—
—
—
—
1,046
—
—
Expected return on plan assets
(68,709)
(64,023)
(62,481)
Amortization of prior service cost
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)
307
41,574
274
491
99,090
(88,012)
(1,364)
2,245
(4,064)
Net periodic benefit cost (income)
$
36,350 $ 100,080 $
(88,449) $
(197) $
3,350 $
(3,018)
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) consists primarily of our reported actuarial loss (gain), curtailments and the
difference between the actual return on plan assets and the expected return on plan assets. Total mark to market adjustments for
our pension and other postretirement benefit plans were gains (losses) of $(40.2) million, $(101.3) million and $92.1 million in
the years ending December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In 2015, the mark to market adjustment reflects a $4.1
million reduction in our pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities related to the correction of prior period census data.
In 2014, we adjusted our mortality assumption, resulting in a $46.9 million increase in our pension liability. As discussed in
Note 17, we have excluded the recognized net actuarial loss (gain) from our reportable segments and such amount has been
reflected in Note 17 as the mark to market adjustment in the reconciliation of reportable segment income to consolidated
operating income (loss). The recognized net actuarial loss (gain) and the affected consolidated and combined statements of
operations line items are as follows:
(In thousands)
Cost of operations
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Other-net
Total
Additional Information
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
$
44,307 $
(4,097)
—
94,204 $
7,233
(102)
(84,772)
(7,331)
27
40,210 $
101,335 $
(92,076)
In 2015, we have recognized expense (income) in other comprehensive income (loss) as a component of net periodic
benefit cost of approximately $0.4 million and $1.0 million for our pension benefits and other postretirement benefits,
respectively. In 2016, we do not expect to recognize any significant expense or income in other comprehensive income (loss) as
a component of net periodic benefit cost for our pension benefits and other postretirement benefits.
Assumptions
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net
periodic benefit obligations at December 31:
Discount rate
Rate of compensation increase
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net
periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase
Pension Benefits
Other Benefits
2015
2014
2015
2014
3.98%
2.51%
3.99%
6.98%
2.56%
3.99%
2.56%
3.99%
7.00%
2.56%
3.41%
—
3.40%
—
3.40%
3.40%
—
—
—
—
79
The expected rate of return on plan assets is based on the long-term expected returns for the investment mix of assets
currently in the portfolio. In setting this rate, we use a building-block approach. Historic real return trends for the various asset
classes in the plan's portfolio are combined with anticipated future market conditions to estimate the real rate of return for each
asset class. These rates are then adjusted for anticipated future inflation to determine estimated nominal rates of return for each
asset class. The expected rate of return on plan assets is determined to be the weighted average of the nominal returns based on
the weightings of the asset classes within the total asset portfolio. We are using an expected return on plan assets assumption of
7.2% for the majority of our pension plan assets (approximately 93% of our total pension assets at December 31, 2015).
Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
Rates to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (ultimate trend rate)
Year that the rate reaches ultimate trend rate
2015
2014
8.50%
4.50%
2024
7.50%
4.50%
2021
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts we report for our health care plan. A one-
percentage-point change in our assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
(In thousands)
One-Percentage-Point Increase
One-Percentage-Point Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
$
22 $
1,502
(21)
(898)
Investment Goals
General: The overall investment strategy of the pension trusts is to achieve long-term growth of principal, while
avoiding excessive risk and to minimize the probability of loss of principal over the long term. The specific investment goals
that have been set for the pension trusts in the aggregate are (1) to ensure that plan liabilities are met when due and (2) to
achieve an investment return on trust assets consistent with a reasonable level of risk.
Allocations to each asset class for both domestic and foreign plans are reviewed periodically and rebalanced, if
appropriate, to assure the continued relevance of the goals, objectives and strategies. The pension trusts for both our domestic
and foreign plans employ a professional investment advisor and a number of professional investment managers whose
individual benchmarks are, in the aggregate, consistent with the plans' overall investment objectives. The goals of each
investment manager are (1) to meet (in the case of passive accounts) or exceed (for actively managed accounts) the benchmark
selected and agreed upon by the manager and the trust and (2) to display an overall level of risk in its portfolio that is consistent
with the risk associated with the agreed upon benchmark.
The investment performance of total portfolios, as well as asset class components, is periodically measured against
commonly accepted benchmarks, including the individual investment manager benchmarks. In evaluating investment manager
performance, consideration is also given to personnel, strategy, research capabilities, organizational and business matters,
adherence to discipline and other qualitative factors that may impact the ability to achieve desired investment results.
Domestic Plans: We sponsor the Retirement Plan for Employees of Babcock & Wilcox Commercial Operations
domestic defined benefit plan. The assets of this plan are commingled for investment purposes with the Company's other
sponsored domestic defined benefit plans and held by the Trustee in The Babcock & Wilcox Company Master Trust (the
"Master Trust"). For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the investment return on domestic plan assets of the Master
Trust (net of deductions for management fees) was approximately (2)% and 14%, respectively.
80
The following is a summary of the asset allocations for the Master Trust at December 31, 2015 and 2014 by asset
category:
Asset Category:
Fixed Income (excluding United States Government Securities)
Commingled and Mutual Funds
United States Government Securities
Equity Securities
Partnerships with Security Holdings
Derivatives
Other
2015
2014
33%
37%
18%
7%
—%
4%
1%
38%
33%
15%
7%
5%
—%
2%
The target asset allocation for the domestic defined benefit plans is 55% fixed income and 45% equities.
Foreign Plans: We sponsor various plans through certain of our foreign subsidiaries. These plans are the Canadian Plans
and the Diamond Power Specialty Limited Retirement Benefits Plan (the "Diamond UK Plan").
The combined weighted average asset allocations of these plans at December 31, 2015 and 2014 by asset category were
as follows:
Asset Category:
Equity Securities and Commingled Mutual Funds
Fixed Income
Other
The target allocation for 2015 for the foreign plans, by asset class, is as follows:
Asset Class:
U. S. Equity
Global Equity
Fixed Income
Fair Value of Plan Assets
2015
2014
48%
51%
1%
46%
53%
1%
Canadian
Plans
Diamond
UK Plan
20%
30%
50%
12%
14%
74%
See Note 16 for a detailed description of fair value measurements and the hierarchy established for valuation inputs. The
following is a summary of total investments for our plans measured at fair value at December 31, 2015:
(In thousands)
Fixed income
Equities
Commingled and mutual funds
U.S. government securities
Cash and accrued items
12/31/2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$
347,269 $
79,761
330,216
155,975
9,809
— $
79,761
—
155,975
539
347,269 $
—
330,216
—
9,270
Total pension and other postretirement benefit assets
$
923,030 $
236,275 $
686,755 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
81
The following is a summary of total investments for our plans measured at fair value at December 31, 2014:
(In thousands)
Fixed Income
Equities
Commingled and Mutual Funds
U.S. Government Securities
Partnerships with Security Holdings
Real Estate
Cash and Accrued Items
12/31/2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$
385,348 $
63,109
334,071
144,609
48,967
2,141
21,265
— $
63,109
4,665
137,783
—
—
385,348 $
—
329,406
6,826
—
—
19,242
2,023
—
—
—
—
48,967
2,141
—
Total pension and other postretirement benefit assets
$
999,510 $
224,799 $
723,603 $
51,108
The following is a summary of the changes in the Plans' Level 3 instruments measured on a recurring basis for the years
ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
Issuances and acquisitions
Dispositions
Realized gain
Unrealized gain
Balance at end of period
Year ended December 31,
2015
2014
$
$
51,108 $
1,266
(53,417)
3,915
(2,872)
— $
55,188
4,633
(16,306)
10,996
(3,403)
51,108
Our Level 3 instruments included assets with no market price but rather calculations of net asset values per share or its
equivalent. When appropriate, we adjusted these net asset values for contributions and distributions, if any, made during the
period beginning on the latest net asset value valuation date and ending on our measurement date. We also considered available
market data, relevant index returns, preliminary estimates from our investees and other data obtained through research and
consultation with third party advisors in determining the fair value of our Level 3 instruments. All of our Level 3 assets were
transferred to our former Parent during the spin-off transaction.
Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Expected employer contributions to trusts of
defined benefit plans:
2016
Expected benefit payments:
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021-2025
Domestic Plans
Foreign Plans
Pension
Benefits
Other
Benefits
Pension
Benefits
Other
Benefits
$
$
1,129 $
4,500 $
3,243 $
65,997 $
4,496 $
2,503 $
67,633
68,981
70,165
71,202
361,313
3,516
3,336
3,125
2,921
11,152
3,247
3,383
3,508
3,595
20,119
144
144
148
151
154
158
745
Defined Contribution Plans
We provide benefits under the B&W Thrift Plan. The B&W Thrift Plan generally provides for matching employer
contributions of 50% of participants' contributions up to 6% of compensation. These matching employer contributions are
82
typically made in cash. We also provide service-based cash contributions under the Thrift Plan to employees not accruing
benefits under our defined benefit plans. Amounts charged to expense for employer contributions under the Thrift Plan totaled
approximately $8.9 million, $7.4 million and $7.5 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
We also provide benefits under the MEGTEC Union and Non-union plans, both of which are defined contribution plans.
The total employer contribution expense for the Union plan was approximately $0.3 million in each of the years ended 2015,
2014 and 2013. For the Non-union plan, the employer contribution expense was approximately $1.1 million, $1.2 million, and
$1.1 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2012, a defined contribution component was added to those Canadian Plans previously offering
defined benefits to salaried employees. As of and in the periods following January 1, 2012, we made cash, service-based
contributions under this arrangement. The amount charged to expense for employer contributions was approximately $0.1
million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Multiemployer Plans
One of our subsidiaries in the Global Services segment contributes to various multiemployer plans. The plans generally
provide defined benefits to substantially all unionized workers in this subsidiary.
The following table summarizes our contributions to multiemployer plans for the years covered by this report:
Pension Fund
EIN/PIN
Pension Protection
Act Zone Status
2015
2014
FIP/RP Stat
us
Pending/
Implemented
Contributions
2015
2014
2013
(in millions)
Surcharge
Imposed
Boilermaker-
Blacksmith
National Pension
Trust
All Other
48-6168020/001 Yellow
Yellow
Yes
$
20.3 $
16.0 $
19.0
No
4.6
4.6
$
24.9 $
20.6 $
11.9
30.9
Expiration
Date Of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
Described
Below
Our collective bargaining agreements with the Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust (the "Boilermaker Plan")
is under a National Maintenance Agreement platform which is evergreen in terms of expiration. However, the agreement allows
for termination by either party with a 90-day written notice. Our contributions to the Boilermaker Plan constitute less than 5%
of total contributions to the Boilermaker Plan. All other contributions expense for all periods included in this report represents
multiple amounts to various plans that, individually, are deemed to be insignificant.
NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In connection with the spin-off, BWC changed its name to BWX Technologies, Inc. We were party to transactions with
our former Parent and its subsidiaries in the normal course of operations. These transactions prior to the June 30, 2015 spin-off
included the following:
(In thousands)
Year ended December 31,
2015 (1)
2014
2013
Sales to our former Parent
Corporate administrative expense
(1) After the spin-off transaction on June 30, 2015, we no longer consider the former Parent to be a Related Party.
5,896 $
73,329
911 $
35,343
$
37,552
76,739
Guarantees
As of December 31, 2015, our former Parent has outstanding performance guarantees for various projects executed by us.
These projects are all in the normal course of business. These guarantees total $1.0 billion and range in expiration dates from
2015 to 2040. The master separation agreement requires that we and our former Parent use our commercially reasonable efforts
to terminate all existing guarantees by one party of obligations relating to the business of the other party, including financial,
83
performance and other guarantee obligations. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, our former Parent has been released from all
but approximately $90 million of the performance guarantees.
Net Transfers from our former Parent
Net transfers from our former Parent represent the change in our former Parent's historical investment in us. It primarily
includes the net effect of cost allocations from transactions with our former Parent, sales to our former Parent, and net transfers
of cash and assets to our former Parent prior to the spin-off. After the spin-off transaction on June 30, 2015, there have been no
significant transfers to or from our former Parent.
(In thousands)
Sales to former Parent
Corporate administrative expenses
Income tax allocation
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired
Cash pooling and general financing activities
Cash contribution received at spin-off
Net transfer from former Parent per statement of cash flows
Non-cash items:
Net transfer of assets and liabilities
Distribution of Nuclear Energy segment
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
911 $
5,896 $
37,552
35,343
11,872
—
(91,015)
125,300
80,589
44,706
(47,839)
73,329
3,378
127,704
14,261
—
213,137
76,739
21,956
—
(13,698)
—
47,445
(62)
—
(37)
—
Net transfer from former Parent per statement of shareholders’ equity
$
77,456 $
213,075 $
47,408
NOTE 10 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
Prior to the spin-off, executive officers, key employees, members of the board of directors and consultants of B&W were
eligible to participate in the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (the "BWC Plan"). Effective
June 30, 2015, executive officers, key employees, members of the board of directors and consultants of B&W are eligible to
participate in the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (the "Plan"). The Plan permits grants
of nonqualifed stock options, incentive stock options, appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance
shares, performance units, and cash incentive awards. The number of shares available for award grants under the Plan totals 5.8
million, of which 2.0 million remain available as of December 31, 2015.
In connection with the spin-off, outstanding stock options and restricted stock units granted under the BWC Plan prior to
2015 were replaced with both an adjusted BWC award and a new B&W stock award. These awards, when combined, had terms
that were intended to preserve the values of the original awards. Outstanding performance share awards originally issued under
the BWC Plan granted prior to 2015 were generally converted into unvested rights to receive the value of deemed target
performance in unrestricted shares of a combination of BWC common stock and B&W common stock, determined by reference
to the ratio of one share of B&W common stock being distributed for every two shares of BWC common stock in the spin-off,
in each case with the same vesting terms as the original awards.
84
Company Stock Options
The fair value of each option grant was estimated at the date of grant using Black-Scholes, with the following weighted-
average assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate
Expected volatility
Expected life of the option in years
Expected dividend yield
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
1.38%
28%
3.96
—%
0.97%
30%
3.76
1.22%
0.56%
33%
3.93
1.19%
The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield on a United States Treasury zero-coupon issue with a remaining
term equal to the expected life of the option. The expected volatility is based on implied volatility from publicly traded options
on our common stock, historical volatility of the price of our common stock and other factors. The expected life of the option is
based on observed historical patterns. The expected dividend yield is based on the projected annual dividend payment per share
divided by the stock price at the date of grant. This amount is zero in 2015 because we did not expect to pay dividends on the
dates the 2015 stock options were awarded.
The following table summarizes activity for our stock options for the post-spin period from July 1, 2015 through
December 31, 2015
(Share data in thousands)
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding at beginning of period
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled/expired/forfeited
Outstanding at end of period
Exercisable at end of period
2,747 $
52
(433)
(6)
2,360 $
759 $
17.42
19.90
14.58
19.12
17.99
17.15
6.78 $
3.66 $
6,803.3
2,821.6
The aggregate intrinsic value included in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value that would have been
received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2015. The intrinsic value is
calculated as the total number of option shares multiplied by the difference between the closing price of our common stock on
the last trading day of the period and the exercise price of the options. This amount changes based on the price of our common
stock.
The weighted-average fair value of the stock options granted in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was
$4.80, $7.03 and $6.07, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $2.3
million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The actual tax benefits realized related to the stock options exercised
during the year ended December 31, 2015 were not significant.
85
Company Restricted Stock Units
Nonvested restricted stock units for the post-spin period from July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 were as follows:
(Share data in thousands)
Nonvested at beginning of period
Granted
Vested
Cancelled/forfeited
Nonvested at end of period
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
1,103 $
56
(159)
(1)
999 $
19.53
19.88
19.73
21.59
19.30
The actual tax benefits realized related to the restricted stock units vested during the year ended December 31, 2015 were
$1.1 million.
NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Investigations and Litigation
ARPA: On February 28, 2014, Arkansas River Power Authority ("ARPA") filed suit against Babcock & Wilcox Power
Generation Group, Inc. ("PGG OpCo") in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Case No. 14-cv-00638-
CMA-NYW) alleging breach of contract, negligence, fraud and other claims arising out of PGG OpCo's delivery of a
circulating fluidized bed boiler and related equipment used in the Lamar Repowering Project pursuant to a 2005 contract.
In 2009, PGG OpCo informed ARPA that the boiler would require a selective non-catalytic reduction system in order to
achieve contractual emissions guarantees, which PGG OpCo supplied in 2010. PGG OpCo recommended additional
modifications in 2011 and 2012 to ensure the boiler would meet contractual emissions guarantees; however, ARPA has not
installed all of the recommended modifications. ARPA has not announced whether it intends to complete and commission the
Lamar plant.
On April 16, 2014, PGG OpCo filed an Answer asserting numerous defenses, including waiver, prevention of
performance and failure to mitigate damages and Counterclaims alleging bad faith, breach of contract and unjust enrichment.
ARPA filed an Answer to the Counterclaims on May 7, 2014. The District Court granted leave for ARPA to amend its
Complaint, and ARPA's First Amended Complaint was accepted on March 20, 2015. PGG OpCo filed its Answer to the First
Amended Complaint on April 1, 2015. Discovery is substantially completed and a trial date has been set for June 2016.
We believe that ARPA has asserted damages theories that are highly speculative and without legal or economic support as
a litigation tactic. We also believe most of the alleged damages are expressly waived and/or capped in enforceable provisions of
the 2005 contract. We cannot estimate the possible loss at this time. However, in addition to establishing other relevant sub-
caps and including an explicit waiver of a broad range of damages, including consequential damages, the 2005 contract
provides an overall cap of liability at the original contract price of approximately $20.5 million. ARPA has alleged various
theories of possible liability and damages that would lead to vastly different measures of damages, making it impracticable to
estimate a range of possible outcomes; however, ARPA's damage claims total approximately $170 million. PGG OpCo does not
believe it is probable that ARPA will be successful in any of its claims. PGG OpCo believes it has strong defenses and intends
to aggressively defend this matter and pursue its counterclaims. However, if ARPA were to prevail on all or any significant
portion of its claims in this matter, the outcome could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Other Litigation: Due to the nature of our business, we are, from time to time, involved in routine litigation or subject to
disputes or claims related to our business activities, including, among other things:
•
•
performance- or warranty-related matters under our customer and supplier contracts and other business arrangements;
and
workers' compensation claims, premises liability claims and other claims.
86
Based upon our prior experience, we do not expect that any of these other litigation proceedings, disputes and claims will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Insurance: Upon the February 22, 2006 effectiveness of the settlement relating to the Chapter 11 proceedings involving
several of our subsidiaries, most of our subsidiaries contributed substantial insurance rights to the asbestos personal injury trust,
including rights to (1) certain pre-1979 primary and excess insurance coverages and (2) certain of our 1979-1986 excess
insurance coverage. These insurance rights provided coverage for, among other things, asbestos and other personal injury
claims, subject to the terms and conditions of the policies. The contribution of these insurance rights was made in exchange for
the agreement on the part of the representatives of the asbestos claimants, including the representative of future claimants, to
the entry of a permanent injunction, pursuant to Section 524(g) of the United States Bankruptcy Code, to channel to the
asbestos trust all asbestos-related claims against our subsidiaries and former subsidiaries arising out of, resulting from or
attributable to their operations, and the implementation of related releases and indemnification provisions protecting those
subsidiaries and their affiliates from future liability for such claims. Although we are not aware of any significant, unresolved
claims against our subsidiaries and former subsidiaries that are not subject to the channeling injunction and that relate to the
periods during which such excess insurance coverage related, with the contribution of these insurance rights to the asbestos
personal injury trust, it is possible that we could have underinsured or uninsured exposure for non-derivative asbestos claims or
other personal injury or other claims that would have been insured under these coverages had the insurance rights not been
contributed to the asbestos personal injury trust.
NOTE 12 – OPERATING LEASES
Future minimum payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancellable lease terms in
excess of one year at December 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ending December 31,
Amount
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
$
$
$
$
$
$
5,443
4,394
3,128
1,968
1,158
337
Total rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $13.5 million, $6.9 million and $6.3
million, respectively. These expense amounts include contingent rentals and are net of sublease income, neither of which is
material.
NOTE 13 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
As discussed in Note 1, we distributed assets and liabilities totaling $47.8 million associated with our NE segment to
BWC in conjunction with the spin-off on June 30, 2015. We received corporate allocations from our former Parent as described
in Note 1, which totaled $2.7 million, $5.3 million and $9.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively. Though these allocations relate to our discontinued NE segment, they are included as part of selling, general and
administrative expenses in the results from our continuing operations because allocations are not eligible for inclusion in
discontinued operations.
The following table presents selected financial information regarding the results of operations of our former NE segment:
Six Months Ended June 30,
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2015
2014
2013
Revenues
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
Income tax provision (benefit)
$
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax $
53,064 $
3,358
555
2,803 $
103,690 $
(19,072)
(4,800)
(14,272) $
153,313
44,532
10,195
34,337
87
The following table presents the carrying values of the major accounts of discontinued operations that are included in our
December 31, 2014 consolidated and combined balance sheet:
(In thousands)
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable – trade, net
Accounts receivable – other
Contracts in progress
Inventories
Deferred income taxes
Other current assets
Total current assets of discontinued operations
Net property, plant and equipment
Goodwill
Deferred income taxes
Intangible assets
Other assets
Total assets of discontinued operations
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued employee benefits
Advance billings on contracts
Accrued warranty expense
Accrued liabilities – other
Total current liabilities of discontinued operations
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
Pension liability
Other liabilities
Total liabilities of discontinued operations
December 31, 2014
426
14,041
1,411
22,953
1,306
48
5,992
46,177
23,721
10,055
2,375
980
1,697
85,005
7,954
7,895
5,475
5,469
17,352
44,145
7,835
7,082
1,071
60,133
$
$
$
$
NOTE 14 – INVESTMENTS
The following is a summary of our investments at December 31, 2015:
(In thousands)
Commercial paper
Mutual funds
Total
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
$
$
3,997 $
1,172
5,169 $
— $
—
— $
(1) $
(79)
(80) $
3,996
1,093
5,089
The following is a summary of our investments at December 31, 2014:
(In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Commercial paper
Asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations
Total
$
$
1,607 $
248
1,855 $
— $
—
— $
— $
(34)
(34) $
1,607
214
1,821
88
Proceeds, gross realized gains and gross realized losses on sales of available-for-sale securities is as follows:
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2015
Year Ended December 31, 2014
Year Ended December 31, 2013
Proceeds
Gross
Realized Gains
Gross
Realized Losses
$
(5,265) $
(10,119)
(3,974)
49 $
15
—
(15)
(2)
—
NOTE 15 – DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We have designated all of our FX forward contracts that qualify for hedge accounting as cash flow hedges. The hedged
risk is the risk of changes in functional-currency-equivalent cash flows attributable to changes in FX spot rates of forecasted
transactions related to long-term contracts. We exclude from our assessment of effectiveness the portion of the fair value of the
FX forward contracts attributable to the difference between FX spot rates and FX forward rates. At December 31, 2015, we had
deferred approximately $1.8 million of net gains on these derivative financial instruments in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). Assuming market conditions continue, we expect to recognize substantially all of this amount in the next twelve
months.
At December 31, 2015, our derivative financial instruments consisted of FX forward contracts. The notional value of our
FX forward contracts totaled $74.3 million at December 31, 2015, with maturities extending to August 2017. These instruments
consist primarily of contracts to purchase or sell euros and British pounds sterling. We are exposed to credit-related losses in
the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments. We attempt to mitigate this risk by using
major financial institutions with high credit ratings. The counterparties to all of our FX forward contracts are financial
institutions included in our credit facility. Our hedge counterparties have the benefit of the same collateral arrangements and
covenants as described under our credit facility.
The following tables summarize our derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2015 and 2014:
(In thousands)
Derivatives Designated as Hedges:
Foreign Exchange Contracts:
Location
Accounts receivable-other
Other assets
Accounts payable
Other liabilities
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges:
Foreign Exchange Contracts:
Location
Accounts receivable-other
Other assets
Accounts payable
Asset and Liability Derivatives
December 31,
2015
2014
$
$
1,545 $
688
17
—
72
—
101
88
—
89
—
175
—
284
89
The effects of derivatives on our financial statements are outlined below:
(In thousands)
Derivatives Designated as Hedges:
Cash Flow Hedges
Foreign Exchange Contracts
December 31,
2015
2014
Amount of loss recognized in other comprehensive income
$
2,920 $
Revenues
Cost of operations
Other-net
Other-net
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges:
Forward Contracts
Location
Location
Location
546
155
(24)
252
(47)
(53)
13
(6)
(339)
Other-net
$
206 $
(184)
NOTE 16 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FASB Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
This topic also sets forth the disclosure requirements regarding fair value and establishes a hierarchy for valuation inputs that
emphasizes the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument's categorization within the fair value
hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy
established by this topic is as follows:
•
•
•
Level 1 – inputs are based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2 – inputs are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for similar or
identical instruments in inactive markets and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions
are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the
assets and liabilities.
Level 3 – inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management's estimates of assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based
techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar valuation techniques.
The following sections describe the valuation methodologies we use to measure the fair values of our investments,
derivatives and nonrecurring fair value measurements.
Available-for-Sale Securities
Investments primarily include money market funds and commercial paper. In general, and where applicable, we
principally use a composite of observable prices and quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities to
determine fair value. This pricing methodology applies to our Level 1 and Level 2 investments. Based on our analysis of these
investments, we believe that none of our available-for-sale securities were other than temporarily impaired at December 31,
2015.
90
Fair Value Measurements
The following is a summary of our available-for-sale securities measured at fair value at December 31, 2015:
(In thousands)
Commercial paper
Mutual funds
Total
12/31/2015
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$
$
3,996 $
1,093
5,089 $
— $
—
— $
3,996 $
1,093
5,089 $
The following is a summary of our available-for-sale securities measured at fair value at December 31, 2014:
(In thousands)
12/31/2014
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Commercial paper
Asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
Total
Derivatives
$
$
1,607 $
214
1,821 $
— $
—
— $
1,607 $
214
1,821 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities currently consist of FX forward contracts. Where applicable, the value of these
derivative assets and liabilities is computed by discounting the projected future cash flow amounts to present value using
market-based observable inputs, including FX forward and spot rates, interest rates and counterparty performance risk
adjustments. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had forward contracts outstanding to purchase or sell foreign currencies,
primarily Euros and British pounds sterling, with a total fair value of $2.2 million and $(0.1) million, respectively.
Other Financial Instruments
We used the following methods and assumptions in estimating our fair value disclosures for our other financial
instruments, as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts that we have reported in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents approximate
their fair values due to their highly liquid nature.
Guarantee: In the third quarter of 2014, B&W issued a letter of credit with a 4 year term totaling approximately $10
million in support of a bank loan borrowed by Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Energy Solutions Private Limited ("TBWES").
TBWES is an unconsolidated affiliate and the letter of credit can be drawn if TBWES defaults on the loan. We recognized the
fair value of this guarantee totaling $1.7 million in other liabilities on our consolidated and combined balance sheets at
December 31, 2015 and 2014 with an associated increase to our investments in unconsolidated affiliates.
NOTE 17 – SEGMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Reportable segments
Our reportable segments are based on three reportable segments, as described in Note 2.
The operations of our segments are managed separately and each has unique technology, services and customers. We
account for intersegment sales at prices that we generally establish by reference to similar transactions with unaffiliated
customers. Reportable segments are measured based on gross profit.
91
Segment financial information
(In thousands)
REVENUES
Global Power:
New Build Environmental Equipment
New Build Steam Generation Systems
Global Services:
Parts and Technical Services
Projects
Construction Services
Operations and Maintenance
Industrial Environmental:
Environmental Solutions
Engineered Equipment
Aftermarket Services
(In thousands)
GROSS PROFIT
Global Power
Global Services
Industrial Environmental
Mark to market adjustment included in costs of operations
Selling, general and administrative
Research and development
Loss on asset disposal and impairments
Equity in income of investees
Restructuring activities
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
150,920 $
171,175 $
489,050
639,970
282,369
297,567
279,969
73,725
933,630
90,343
32,002
61,350
300,754
471,929
311,294
286,094
242,295
68,999
908,682
48,938
21,190
35,290
183,695
105,418
310,327
402,134
712,461
304,598
406,196
279,997
64,399
1,055,190
—
—
—
—
$
1,757,295 $
1,486,029 $
1,767,651
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
111,309 $
94,647 $
192,241
48,914
(44,307)
193,629
24,961
(94,204)
126,275
225,434
—
84,772
$
308,157 $
219,033 $
436,481
(244,065)
(16,543)
(14,597)
(242)
(14,946)
(218,038)
(18,483)
(1,752)
8,681
(20,183)
(211,401)
(21,043)
(1,181)
18,387
(18,343)
Mark to market adjustment included in selling, general and
administrative expenses
Operating income (loss)
4,097
(7,233)
7,331
$
21,861 $
(37,975) $
210,231
Included in operating income (loss) above are the following:
(In thousands)
EQUITY IN INCOME OF INVESTEES
Global Power
Global Services
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
$
(3,295) $
(1,717) $
3,054
10,398
(242) $
8,681 $
7,097
11,290
18,387
92
(In thousands)
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Global Power
Global Services
Industrial Environmental
Segment depreciation and amortization
Corporate
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2015
$
4,424 $
3,988 $
12,655
10,345
27,424
7,508
15,806
8,197
27,991
4,445
3,917
17,950
—
21,867
1,163
23,030
Total depreciation and amortization
$
34,932 $
32,436 $
We do not separately identify or report our Company's assets by segment as the majority of our assets are shared by the
Global Power and Global Services segments. Additionally, our chief operating decision maker does not consider assets by
segment to be a critical measure by which performance is measured.
93
Information about our consolidated operations in different geographic areas
REVENUES(1)
United States
Canada
United Kingdom
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Vietnam
China
Chile
Germany
Sweden
India
France
Finland
Poland
Columbia
Italy
Netherlands
Thailand
South Africa
South Korea
Saudi Arabia
Greenland
Mexico
Australia
Spain
Brazil
Malaysia
Taiwan
Tunisia
Indonesia
Other Countries
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
(In thousands)
$
1,034,653 $
934,397 $
1,144,853
134,276
126,285
116,064
82,916
46,803
41,921
19,503
19,233
18,302
13,108
6,377
6,113
5,437
4,904
4,671
4,651
4,606
4,486
4,358
4,220
3,172
2,933
2,817
2,311
2,176
2,173
2,141
1,868
1,730
33,087
136,382
235,815
61,972
65,436
27,399
3,829
53,005
15,686
22,792
29,786
5,070
6,188
4,926
3,343
8,037
3,540
1,441
8,113
3,137
14,149
8,003
920
2,344
2,540
1,102
3,156
706
1,007
169
5,324
52,130
20,042
56,336
473
1,946
52,932
9,240
22,869
37,823
4,670
2,173
—
1,748
44,622
2,532
8,099
2,650
2,208
5,926
8,200
—
3,461
1,808
640
2,751
1,808
1,144
—
6,227
84,655
(1) We allocate geographic revenues based on the location of the customer's operations.
$
1,757,295 $
1,486,029 $
1,767,651
94
NET PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
United States
Canada
China
Mexico
United Kingdom
Denmark
Germany
Other Countries
$
88,840 $
82,209 $
1,201
13,956
24,643
8,070
6,265
1,270
1,472
3,757
12,356
12,106
8,638
6,963
1,536
7,672
77,993
6,581
10,980
8,312
9,414
8,715
2,060
6,852
$
145,717 $
135,237 $
130,907
NOTE 18 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
2015
2014
2013
Year Ended December 31,
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
Net income (loss) attributable to Babcock & Wilcox
Enterprises, Inc.
Weighted average common shares used to calculate basic
earnings per common share
Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock and performance
shares(1)
Weighted average common shares used to calculate diluted
earnings per common share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
16,338 $
2,803
(12,256) $
(14,272)
140,189
34,338
19,141 $
(26,528) $
174,527
53,487,071
54,238,631
55,950,875
221,912
—
391,834
53,708,983
54,238,631
56,342,709
0.31 $
0.05
0.36 $
0.30 $
0.06
0.36 $
(0.23) $
(0.26)
(0.49) $
(0.23) $
(0.26)
(0.49) $
2.51
0.61
3.12
2.49
0.61
3.10
(1) At December 31, 2015 and 2013, we excluded from the diluted share calculation 1,286,102 and 221,113 shares,
respectively, related to stock options, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
NOTE 19 – SHARE REPURCHASES
On August 4, 2015, we announced that our board of directors authorized the repurchase of an indeterminate number of
our shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate market value of up to $100 million. We repurchased 1.3 million
shares of our common stock for $24.3 million during 2015, and 1.2 million shares of our common stock for $23.3 million in the
period from January 1, 2016 through February 25, 2016. We are authorized to repurchase up to $52.4 million more of our
common stock through June 8, 2017.
95
Any shares purchased that were not part of our publicly announced plan are related to repurchases of common stock
pursuant to the provisions of employee benefit plans that permit the repurchase of shares to satisfy statutory tax withholding
obligations.
NOTE 20 – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following tables set forth selected unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2015
and 2014:
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues
Gross profit
Operating income (loss) (1)
Equity in income (loss) of investees
Net income (loss) attributable to Babcock & Wilcox
Enterprises, Inc.
Earnings per common share
Basic
Continuing
Discontinued
Diluted
Continuing
Discontinued
(1)
Includes equity in income of investees.
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues
Gross profit
Operating income (loss) (1)
Equity in income (loss) of investees
Net income (loss) attributable to Babcock & Wilcox
Enterprises, Inc.
Earnings per common share
Basic
Continuing
Discontinued
Diluted
Continuing
Discontinued
(1)
Includes equity in income of investees.
Year Ended December 31, 2015
Quarter Ended
March 31, 2015
June 30, 2015
Sept. 30, 2015
Dec. 31, 2015
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
397,155 $
83,397 $
17,343 $
(2,071) $
437,485 $
81,884 $
419,977 $
77,922 $
4,859 $
967 $
9,632 $
1,047 $
502,678
64,954
(9,973)
(185)
12,689 $
5,487 $
6,169 $
(5,204)
0.21 $
0.03 $
0.21 $
0.03 $
0.08 $
0.02 $
0.08 $
0.02 $
0.11 $
— $
0.11 $
— $
(0.10)
—
(0.10)
—
Year Ended December 31, 2014
Quarter Ended
March 31, 2014
June 30, 2014
Sept. 30, 2014
Dec. 31, 2014
312,078 $
56,851 $
327,379 $
69,028 $
402,016 $
88,370 $
444,556
4,784
4,515 $
2,366 $
3,170 $
25,542 $
(71,202)
433 $
2,859 $
3,023
11,089 $
4,936 $
5,609 $
(48,162)
0.13 $
0.07 $
0.13 $
0.07 $
0.03 $
0.06 $
0.03 $
0.06 $
0.24 $
(0.14) $
0.24 $
(0.14) $
(0.63)
(0.27)
(0.63)
(0.27)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
96
We recognize actuarial gains and losses for our pension and postretirement benefit plans into earnings in the fourth
quarter of each year as a component of net periodic benefit cost. The effect of these adjustments on pre-tax income in the
quarters ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $40.2 million and $99.3 million, respectively. Additionally, in the quarter
ended September 30, 2014, we recognized a pre-tax loss of $2.0 million because of the interim remeasurement requirement
resulting from settlements of certain Canadian pension obligations.
Item 9.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
None.
Item 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
adopted by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")). Our disclosure controls and
procedures were developed through a process in which our management applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits
of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding the control objectives.
You should note that the design of any system of disclosure controls and procedures is based in part upon various assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot assure you that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under
all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. Based on the evaluation referred to above, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective as of December 31, 2015 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including
its principal executives and principal financial officers or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over
financial reporting or an attestation of the Company’s registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by
rules of the SEC for newly-public companies.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2015
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
None
97
PART III
Item 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this item with respect to directors is incorporated by reference to the material appearing
under the heading "Election of Directors" in the Proxy Statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The
information required by this item with respect to compliance with section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, is incorporated by reference to the material appearing under the heading "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Compliance" in the Proxy Statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The information required by this item with
respect to the Audit Committee and Audit and Finance Committee financial experts is incorporated by reference to the material
appearing in the "Director Independence" and "Audit and Finance Committee" sections under the heading "Corporate
Governance – Board of Directors and Its Committees" in the Proxy Statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct for our employees and directors, including, specifically, our chief executive
officer, our chief financial officer, our chief accounting officer, and our other executive officers. Our code satisfies the
requirements for a "code of ethics" within the meaning of SEC rules. A copy of the code is posted on our web site,
www.babcock.com under "Investor Relations – Corporate Governance – Highlights." We intend to disclose promptly on our
website any amendments to, or waivers of, the code covering our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief
accounting officer.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Name
Jenny L. Apker
Mark A. Carano
E. James Ferland
Elias Gedeon
Peter J. Goumas
J. André Hall
Daniel W. Hoehn
Mark S. Low
Wendy S. Radtke
D. Paul Scavuzzo
Kenneth Zak
Age
58
Position
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
46
49
56
52
50
37
59
46
51
57
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Treasurer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Senior Vice President and Chief Business Development Officer
Senior Vice President, Operations
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Senior Vice President, Global Services
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer
Senior Vice President, Global Power
Senior Vice President, Industrial Environmental
Jenny L. Apker serves as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to the spin-off, Ms. Apker served
as Vice President, Treasurer and Investor Relations of BWC since August 2012 and, prior to that time, served as Vice President
and Treasurer since joining BWC in June 2010. Previously, Ms. Apker served as Vice President and Treasurer with Dex One
Corporation (formerly R.H. Donnelley Corporation), a marketing services company, from May 2003 until June 2010.
Mark A. Carano serves as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Treasurer. Prior to the spin-off, Mr.
Carano served as Senior Vice President and Chief Corporate Development Officer of BWC since August 2013. Prior to joining
BWC in June 2013, Mr. Carano served as a Managing Director in the Investment Banking Group of Bank of America Merrill
Lynch since 2006. Mr. Carano also previously held positions with the Investment Banking Group of Deutsche Bank.
E. James Ferland serves as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to the spin-off, Mr. Ferland was President
and Chief Executive Officer of BWC since April 2012. Prior to joining BWC, Mr. Ferland served as President of the Americas
division for Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, a nuclear energy company and group company of Toshiba Corporation,
from 2010 through March 2012. From 2007 to 2010, Mr. Ferland worked for PNM Resources, Inc., a holding company of
utilities providing electricity and energy products and services, where he held positions as Senior Vice President of Utility
Operations and Senior Vice President of Energy Resources. Previously, Mr. Ferland held various senior management and
engineering positions at Westinghouse Electric Company, Louisiana Energy Services/URENCO, Duke Engineering and
98
Services, Carolina Power & Light and General Dynamics. Mr. Ferland has also served on the board of directors of Actuant
Corporation since August 2014.
Elias Gedeon serves as our Senior Vice President and Chief Business Development Officer. Prior to the spin-off, Mr.
Gedeon served as Senior Vice President and Chief Business Development Officer of BWC since May 2014. Mr. Gedeon has
more than 30 years of experience in the power generation industry and has held various sales, operations and P&L leadership
positions in the U.S. and overseas. He joined BWC from Alstom Power, Inc., a subsidiary of energy and transport manufacturer
Alstom, where he served as Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing - Boiler Group since 2009 and previously as Vice
President of Sales, Americas. Prior to joining Alstom, Mr. Gedeon served in sales and operations roles of increasing
responsibility with Foster Wheeler Power Group, Inc., including Executive Vice President, Global Sales & Marketing.
Peter J. Goumas serves as our Senior Vice President, Operations. From October 2013 to June 2015, Mr. Goumas served as
Vice President and General Manager of Operations of BWC. Prior to that, he served in a number of positions with Babcock &
Wilcox Nuclear Operations Group, Inc. (“B&W NOG”), including from August 2011 to September 2013 as Vice President,
Programs, Contracts and Business Development, where he was responsible for all project management, procurement and
contracting across the operations, as well as the business development and strategic planning activities. From May 2010 to July
2011, Mr. Goumas served as Vice President, Manufacturing and Business Development, responsible for B&W NOG’s business
units in Barberton and Euclid, Ohio, and Mt. Vernon, Indiana.
J. André Hall serves as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Prior to the spin-off, Mr.
Hall served as Assistant General Counsel, Transactions and Compliance of BWC since August 2013. Prior to joining BWC, Mr.
Hall served in various roles of increasing responsibility with Goodrich Corporation, an aerospace manufacturing company,
most recently as Vice President of Business Conduct and Chief Ethics Officer from October 2009 until July 2012 when it was
acquired by United Technologies Corporation. For the five years prior to becoming Chief Ethics Officer, Mr. Hall served as the
segment general counsel for one of Goodrich Corporation’s multibillion dollar operating segments.
Daniel W. Hoehn serves as our Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Hoehn joined BWC in
March 2015. Formerly, Mr. Hoehn was Vice President and Controller at Chiquita Brands International, Inc., responsible for
financial reporting for Chiquita’s operations across three continents. From 2010 to 2013, he was Assistant Corporate Controller,
after serving as Manager, Financial Reporting, from 2007 to 2010. Prior to joining Chiquita, Mr. Hoehn was a senior manager
in the audit practice at KPMG, LLP.
Mark S. Low serves as our Senior Vice President, Global Services segment. Prior to the spinoff, Mr. Low was Vice
President and General Manager of BWC’s Global Services Division from 2013 to March 2015. Previously, from 2012 to 2013,
he was Vice President and General Manager of BWC’s Environmental Products and Services Division, responsible for all
aspects of our environmental products and services business. From 2007 to 2012, he served as Vice President, Service Projects,
in which he led all technical and commercial aspects of our service projects business including project management,
forecasting, costing, cost forecasting, and warranty resolution.
Wendy S. Radtke serves as our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer. Prior to the spin-off,
Ms. Radtke joined BWC in April 2015 to lead the global Human Resources function. From 2012-2015, Ms. Radtke served as
Vice President of Talent Management at The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, and from 2009 to 2012, she was Vice
President, Asia Pacific Human Resources at Goodyear, located in Shanghai, China. Before joining Goodyear, Ms. Radtke spent
eight years at Honeywell International where she held a variety of positions with increasing responsibility, including her last
role as Vice President of Asia Pacific Human Resources for the Automation Control Solutions business located in Shanghai,
China. Previously, Ms. Radtke held various human resource roles at 3M Corp and The Pepsi Bottling Group.
D. Paul Scavuzzo serves as our Senior Vice President, Global Power segment. He is currently responsible for directing
our new-boiler and environmental product lines in North America and internationally. Mr. Scavuzzo is also responsible for our
Denmark-based subsidiary, Babcock & Wilcox Volund A/S, our joint venture operations in China and India, as well as our
research & development and licensing activities. From March 2012 to March 2015, Mr. Scavuzzo was Vice President and
General Manager of the Global Power Division of BWC. Previously, from 2009 to 2012, he was Vice President, Steam
Generating Systems, responsible for leading the utility and industrial boiler business segment.
99
Kenneth Zak serves as our Senior Vice-President, Industrial Environmental segment, taking this position on July 1, 2015.
From December 2012 through June 2015, Mr. Zak served as the Senior Vice-President for Business Operations for MEGTEC
where he was responsible for MEGTEC’s Environmental Solutions business worldwide as well as sales and business
development for the Engineered Products business. Previously, from 2003 to 2012, Mr. Zak was Vice President of the Industrial
& Environmental Products Group for MEGTEC, responsible for business teams in the Americas and Asia and drove strategy
deployment activities and annual improvement priorities on a global basis. Mr. Zak also previously held business development
and marketing positions at W. R. Grace & Co. and Owens-Corning Fiberglass.
Item 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the material appearing under the headings
"Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Compensation of Directors," "Compensation of Executive Officers,"
"Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Compensation Committee Report" in the Proxy
Statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 12.
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
The following table provides information on our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options and rights
Weighted-average
exercise price
of outstanding
options and rights
Number of
securities remaining
available for
future issuance
3,407,964 $
18.32
2,022,397
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
The other information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the material appearing under the headings
"Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers" and "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" in the Proxy
Statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 13.
INDEPENDENCE
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the material appearing under the headings "Corporate
Governance – Director Independence" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Proxy Statement for our
2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the material appearing under the heading
"Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Year Ending December 31, 2015" in the
Proxy Statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
100
PART IV
Item 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report or incorporated by reference:
1.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and
2013
2013
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
2.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
All schedules for which provision is made of the applicable regulations of the SEC have been omitted because they are
not required under the relevant instructions or because the required information is included in the financial statements or the
related footnotes contained in this report.
3.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number
Description
2.1*
3.1
3.2
10.1
10.2
Master Separation Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2015, between The Babcock & Wilcox Company and
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Babcock & Wilcox
Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-
36876))
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Babcock & Wilcox
Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-
36876))
Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2015, by and between The Babcock & Wilcox Company
and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Babcock &
Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No.
001-36876))
Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2015, by and between The Babcock & Wilcox
Company and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2015 (File No. 001-36876))
101
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8†
10.9†
10.10†
10.11†
10.12†
10.13
Transition Services Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2015, between The Babcock & Wilcox Company, as
service provider, and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc., as service receiver (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Transition Services Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2015, between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.,
as service provider, and The Babcock & Wilcox Company, as service receiver (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Assumption and Loss Allocation Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2015, by and among ACE American
Insurance Company and the Ace Affiliates (as defined therein), Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
and The Babcock & Wilcox Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Babcock &
Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No.
001-36876))
Reinsurance Novation and Assumption Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2015, by and among ACE
American Insurance Company and the Ace Affiliates (as defined therein), Creole Insurance Company
and Dampkraft Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Babcock &
Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No.
001-36876))
Novation and Assumption Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2015, by and among The Babcock &
Wilcox Company, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc., Dampkraft Insurance Company and Creole
Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises,
Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.9 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Management Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Defined Contribution Restoration Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.12 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2015, between Babcock & Wilcox Power
Generation Group, Inc. and BWXT Foreign Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13
to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
102
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19†
10.20†
10.21†
10.22†
Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2015, between Babcock & Wilcox Technology,
Inc. and Babcock & Wilcox Investment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2015, between Babcock & Wilcox Canada Ltd.
and B&W PGG Canada Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Babcock & Wilcox
Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-
36876))
Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2015, between Babcock & Wilcox mPower, Inc.
and Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to
the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2015, between The Babcock & Wilcox Company
and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Babcock &
Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No.
001-36876))
Credit Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2015, among Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc., as the
borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the Other Lenders Party Thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Form of Change-in-Control Agreement, by and between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and
certain officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (Spin-off Award) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Form of Restricted Stock Units Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2015 (File No. 001-36876))
Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Babcock &
Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015
(File No. 001-36876))
10.23†
Form of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
10.24
Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Chief Executive Officer
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Chief Financial Officer
103
32.1
32.2
95
Section 1350 certification of Chief Executive Officer
Section 1350 certification of Chief Financial Officer
Mine Safety Disclosure
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
Certain schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A
*
copy of any omitted schedule and/or exhibit will be furnished to the SEC upon request.
†
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
104
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
February 25, 2016
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.
/s/ E. James Ferland
By: E. James Ferland
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the date indicated.
Signature
Title
/s/ E. James Ferland
E. James Ferland
/s/ Jenny L. Apker
Jenny L. Apker
/s/ Daniel W. Hoehn
Daniel W. Hoehn
/s/ Thomas A. Christopher
Thomas A. Christopher
/s/ Cynthia S. Dubin
Cynthia S. Dubin
/s/ Brian K. Ferraioli
Brian K. Ferraioli
/s/ Stephen G. Hanks
Stephen G. Hanks
/s/ Anne R. Pramaggiore
Anne R. Pramaggiore
/s/ Larry L. Weyers
Larry L. Weyers
February 25, 2016
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Representative)
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Representative)
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
105
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
COMPANY INFORMATION
Headquarters
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Suite 700
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA 28277
Phone: 704.625.4900
Fax: 704.625.4910
www.babcock.com
Employees
5,700, in addition to 2,500 joint venture employees
Investor Information
Copies of the Annual Report and Form 10-K filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
and other investor information may be obtained by
request in writing to Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises,
Inc., 13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Suite 700,
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA 28277 Attention:
Investor Relations, or by visiting our website
at www.babcock.com.
Annual Meeting
2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Friday, May 6, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. local time
The Ballantyne Hotel
10000 Ballantyne Commons Parkway
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA 28277
Transfer Agent
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
250 Royal Street
Canton, Massachusetts, USA 02021
Phone: 781.575.2723
www.computershare.com
Independent Auditors
Deloitte & Touche LLP
550 South Tryon Street
Suite 2500
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA 28202
Phone: 704.887.1500
Investor Relations
Leslie C. Kass
Vice President, Investor Relations
and Communications
Email: investors@babcock.com
Phone: 704.625.4867
Company Officers
E. JAMES FERLAND
Board of Directors
E. JAMES FERLAND
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Babcock & Wilcox
THOMAS A. CHRISTOPHER (2) (3)
Director
CYNTHIA S. DUBIN(1) (3)
Director
BRIAN K. FERRAIOLI (1)* (3)
Director
STEPHEN G. HANKS (2) (3)*
Lead Independent Director
ANNE R. PRAMAGGIORE (1) (2)
Director
LARRY L. WEYERS (1) (2)*
Director
1 Audit and Finance Committee
2 Compensation Committee
3 Governance Committee
* Committee Chair
JENNY L. APKER
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
MARK A. CARANO
Senior Vice President,
Corporate Development
and Treasurer
ELIAS GEDEON
Senior Vice President
and Chief Business
Development Officer
PETER J. GOUMAS
Senior Vice President,
Operations
J. ANDRÉ HALL
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
DANIEL W. HOEHN
Vice President,
Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
MARK S. LOW
Senior Vice President,
Global Services
WENDY S. RADTKE
Senior Vice President
and Chief Human
Resources Officer
D. PAUL SCAVUZZO
Senior Vice President,
Global Power
KENNETH ZAK
Senior Vice President,
Industrial Environmental
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Suite 700
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA 28277
Phone: 704.625.4900
Fax: 704.625.4910
www.babcock.com