Quarterlytics / Industrials / Residential Construction / Barratt Developments

Barratt Developments

bdev · LSE Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker bdev
Exchange LSE
Sector Industrials
Industry Residential Construction
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2015 Annual Report · Barratt Developments
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Building  
Excellence

Barratt Developments PLC 
Annual Report and Accounts 2015

Front and inside cover: 
Woodlands, Bedford, 
a range of beautifully 
designed three and four 
bedroom traditional homes.

1

Welcome to Barratt Developments

Our vision is to lead the future of 
housebuilding by putting customers first 
and at the heart of everything we do.

By investing in our people, we are leading 
construction to create great places 
where people aspire to live, and generating 
sustainable returns for our shareholders.

Inside this report
Strategic Report
A snapshot of our business 
Our performance and  
financial highlights 
How we create and preserve value 
Chairman’s statement 
Key aspects of our market 
Chief Executive’s statement 
Risk management  

2

4
6
8
10
12
40

Governance 
The Board  
Chairman’s introduction 
Overview 
Corporate governance report 
Nomination Committee report 
Audit Committee report 
Safety, Health and Environment 
Committee report 
Remuneration report 
Other statutory disclosures 
Statement of Directors’  
Responsibilities 

46
48
50
51
62
66

73
75
96

102

Priorities in action

Customer first 

Great places 

Leading construction 

Investing in our people 

Our principles
Keeping people safe 
Being a trusted partner 
Building strong  
community relationships 
Safeguarding the environment 
Ensuring the financial health  
of the business 

18

22

26

30

34
35

36
37

38

103
106     

107

Financial Statements 
Independent auditor’s report  
Consolidated Income Statement 
Statements of  
Comprehensive Income  
Statements of Changes in 
Shareholders’ Equity 
Balance Sheets 
Cash Flow Statements 
Accounting Policies 
Impact of Standards and 
Interpretations in issue  
but not yet effective 
Critical Accounting Judgements  
and Key Sources of Estimation 
Uncertainty  
119
Notes to the Financial Statements  121

108
110
111
112

118

Other information 

161

Notice regarding limitations on Director liability under English law
Under the Companies Act 2006, a safe harbour limits the liability of Directors in respect of statements in, and omissions from, the Strategic Report contained on pages 2 to 45 and the Directors’ 
Report contained on pages 46 to 102. Under English Law the Directors would be liable to the Company (but not to any third party) if the Strategic Report and/or the Directors’ Report contains errors 
as a result of recklessness or knowing misstatement or dishonest concealment of a material fact, but would not otherwise be liable.
Strategic Report and Directors’ Report
Pages 2 to 45 inclusive comprise the Strategic Report and pages 46 to 102 inclusive comprise the Directors’ Report, both of which have been drawn up and presented in accordance with,  
and in reliance upon, English Company Law and liabilities of the Directors in connection with the reports shall be subject to the limitations and restrictions provided by such law.
Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements
The Group’s reports including this document and written information released, or oral statements made, to the public in future by or on behalf of the Group, may contain forward-looking statements. 
Although the Group believes that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any statements about future outlook may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and 
results to be materially different.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements2

A snapshot of our business 
We are the nation’s leading housebuilder 
operating across Britain with 27 housebuilding 
divisions delivering 16,447 homes this year.

Homes legally completed1

a Our homes

a Our customers

 16,447

(2014: 14,838)

We are a HBF 5 Star housebuilder 
and create great places to live. 
We aspire to meet Building 
for Life 12 standards3 on all of 
our developments.

We put our customers first. 
We build great homes and aim  
to provide customer service  
that exceeds expectations.

Average active sites2

2015 completions by unit type

2015 completions by deal type

 380

(2014: 364)

Housebuilding divisions

 27

(2014: 27)

Owned and controlled 
land bank plots

 70,523

(2014: 66,570)

Employees

 5,971

(2014: 5,755)

2015

2014

  1 and 2 bedroom houses

12%

12%

  Help to Buy

  3 bedroom houses

33% 35%

  Part Exchange

  4 bedroom houses

28%

26%

  NewBuy/Mi New Home

  5 and 6 bedroom houses

  Flats London

4%

9%

4%

7%

  Other Private

  Investor

  Flats non-London

14%

16%

  Affordable

2015

2014

31%

31%

8%

0%

8%

2%

32%

31%

11%

12%

18%

16%

1   Total completions, including joint ventures, were 16,447 (2014: 14,838) for the year. Private completions for the year were 12,746 (2014: 11,936). 
Affordable completions for the year were 2,853 (2014: 2,255) and JV completions in which the Group had an interest were 848 (2014: 647).

2   Unless otherwise stated, all numbers quoted exclude joint ventures (‘JV’) and are as at 30 June 2015 throughout this Annual Report and Accounts.

3   Building for Life 12 is the industry standard, endorsed by the Government, for well-designed homes and neighbourhoods that local communities, local authorities and developers are invited to use to stimulate 

conversations about creating good places to live. 

4   Housebuilding contributes 98.5% (2014: 99.5%) of revenues. We also have a commercial developments business which contributes 1.5% (2014: 0.5%) of revenues.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic Report3

a Our geographic spread

We are the nation’s leading 
housebuilder committed to 
operating throughout Britain4.

a Our brands

We have three main brands – Barratt Homes, 
David Wilson Homes and Barratt London. 
Commercial developments are delivered by 
Wilson Bowden Developments.

Northern 
3,289 homes 
(2014: 2,918)

Central 
3,030 homes 
(2014: 3,132)

West 
2,336 homes 
(2014: 2,336)

Total completions  
(including joint ventures) 

+11%

on 2014

East 
2,945 homes 
(2014: 2,526)

Southern 
2,882 homes 
(2014: 2,316)

London 
1,965 homes 
(2014: 1,610)

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements 
4

Our performance and financial highlights
It has been a record year. We delivered our highest ever profit 
before tax and a strong performance against all our key metrics. 

Revenue £m

£3,759.5m

+19.1%

2,606.2

2,323.4

2,035.4

3,759.5

3,157.0

Gross margin %

19.0%

+220bps

19.0

16.8

12.7

13.8

11.2

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Target 
Controlled growth in 
completion volumes 

Status
On target

Profit before tax1 £m

£565.5m

+44.8%

390.6

192.0

110.7

42.7

KPI

565.5

Target
At least 20% by FY17

Status  
On target

KPI

Earnings per share pence

45.5p

+45.8%

45.5

31.2

7.0

7.7

(1.4)

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Target 
£530.0m profit before tax in line 
with consensus at the start of the 
financial year

Status
Achieved
1   Profit before tax in 2011-2013 is calculated before 

exceptional items.

Target 
42.5p in line with consensus at the 
start of the financial year 

Status 
Achieved

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic Report5

KPI

Total shareholder return for the  
three years ended 30 June 2015

362.9%

Completions from more 
recently acquired land %

76%

+1,100bps

76

65

49

35

16

Total capital return per share2

25.1 pence

KPI

Land approvals plots

16,956

-21.1%

21,478

18,536

16,956

12,085

8,861

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Target 
95% of completions from more recently 
acquired land for FY17

Target 
15,000–17,000 plots approved 
for purchase

Status
On target

Status
Achieved

Return on capital employed3 %

Year end net cash/(debt) £m

KPI

KPI

23.9%

+440bps

23.9

19.5

11.5

8.3

5.7

£186.5m

+£113.4m

186.5

(322.6)

(167.7)

(25.9)

73.1

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Target 
At least 25% by FY17

Status 
On target
2   The Board proposes a final dividend of 10.3 pence per share in 

addition to the interim dividend of 4.8 pence per share. A further 
special cash payment equating to 10.0 pence per share under the 
special cash payment programme is also proposed.

3   Return on capital employed (‘ROCE’) is calculated as earnings 
before interest, tax, operating charges relating to the defined 
benefit pension scheme and operating exceptional items, divided 
by average net assets adjusted for goodwill and intangibles, tax, 
cash, loans and borrowings, retirement benefit obligations and 
derivative financial instruments.

Target 
Minimal year end net cash

Status 
Achieved

Read more in the Strategic Report on pages 2 to 45

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements6

How we create and preserve value
Our business model focuses on delivering value across 
the housebuilding value chain, creating sustainable returns 
for shareholders and making a positive difference in the 
communities in which we operate.

a What we do

Targeted land buying and effective planning

Resources and Relationships 
critical to our business model

>  Availability of financial capital

 See Ensuring the financial health  
of our business on page 38

>  Outstanding people 

 See Investing in our people  
on page 30

Outstanding design

i

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
a
n
d
R
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
p
s
c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
t
o
o
u
r
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
m
o
d
e
l

>  Good relationships with land 
agents and land owners to 
secure sufficient land in 
prime locations

>  Strong relationships with 
local government and 
obtaining effective planning 
permissions

>  Affordable mortgages being 
available for our customers 

>  Availability of sufficient high 
quality building materials

>  Availability of sufficient 

labour and skilled 
subcontractors

 See Being a trusted partner  
on page 35 

>  Good relationships with 
communities in which  
we operate

 See Building strong community 
relationships on page 36

Construction excellence and efficiency

Innovative sales and marketing

Industry leading customer experience

>  Purchase land in targeted 
locations which at least 
meets our hurdle rates  
of 20% gross margin and  
25% ROCE

>  Work with local communities 

and authorities to deliver 
effective planning 
permissions

>  Design outstanding 

homes and places for our 
customers, using standard 
house designs, developed 
using customer research

>  Build quality homes 

efficiently, with centralised 
procurement and sharing of 
best practice, while ensuring 
high standards of health and 
safety

>  Constantly innovate our 
sales and marketing 
methods to customers
>  Ensure our brands have 
carefully defined market 
positions

>  Focus on maintaining the 

very highest levels of quality 

>  Seek to understand 

customer needs and provide 
a first class customer 
experience

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7

a What differentiates us? a The associated risks

>  Geographically diverse, managing 

>  Economic environment, 

risk by operating throughout 
Britain 

>  Capability to deliver developments 
of all levels of complexity from 
standard housing to large and 
highly complex London schemes
>  Proven track record in delivering 

successful JV partnerships

including housing demand  
and mortgage availability

> Land purchasing
> Liquidity
>  Government regulation  

and planning policy

> Joint ventures and consortia
>  Attracting and retaining  
high-calibre employees

> IT

>  Quality well designed homes that  

>  Government regulation  

fit our customers’ lifestyles 

>  Developments that enhance their 
local community with our aim 
that all new developments meet 
Building for Life 12 standards

and planning policy
>  Construction and new 

technologies

>  Safety, health and 
environmental

>  Attracting and retaining  
high-calibre employees

>  Outstanding, efficient operational 

delivery through experienced teams 

>  Ability to deliver complex London 

developments

>  Centrally contracted, long standing 

relationships with material 
suppliers managing our cost base 
and ensuring continuity of supply
>  Strong, long standing relationships 

with local subcontractors 

>  Economic environment,  

including housing demand  
and mortgage availability

> Land purchasing
> Construction and new technologies 
>  Availability of raw materials, 
subcontractors and suppliers
>  Safety, health and environmental
> Joint Ventures and consortia
>  Attracting and retaining  
high-calibre employees

> IT

>  Strong, well recognised brands 
– Barratt Homes, David Wilson 
Homes and Barratt London
>  Efficient sales teams using 
targeted marketing and our 
continued investment in IT  
to deliver strong sales rates

>  Economic environment, 

including housing demand 
and mortgage availability
>  Attracting and retaining  
high-calibre employees

> IT

>  Only national housebuilder to 
achieve 5 Star HBF rating for 
customer satisfaction for six 
consecutive years

>  Attracting and retaining  
high-calibre employees 

>  Availability of raw materials, 
subcontractors and suppliers

> IT

 See pages 40 to 45

a   The value this creates 
for shareholders

a   The value this creates 
for customers and 
society

>  Increasing margins and return 

on capital employed

FY17 targets: At least

 25%

Return 
on capital 
employed

 20%

Gross margin

>  Ability to achieve the best 

possible prices for the homes 
we sell, driving returns
>  Successful development 

enhances local relationships 
and reputation, helping source 
future sites, obtain effective 
planning permissions, 
community support and 
customers

>  Improving return on capital 
employed through capital 
efficiency

>  Security of materials and 

subcontractor supply 

>  Good sales rates and revenues 
delivering improved returns 

>  Delivery of quality housing  
to help address Britain’s 
housing shortage

>  Investment in local facilities 
and infrastructure resulting 
from development 

>  Regeneration of  
brownfield sites

>  Positive legacy for local 

communities by building great 
places to live

>  Efficient house design reduces 
energy consumption and helps 
to provide a more sustainable 
future 

>  High standards of health and 

safety on our sites

>  Job creation through over 

12,000 supplier and 
subcontractor companies that 
we help support
>  Helping address the 

construction industry skills 
shortage through employing 
and training apprentices and 
graduates and improving 
industry reputation
>  Efficient sales process 
enhances the customer 
journey from reservation 
through to completion

>  Improved revenues and 

improved efficiency through 
reduced remedial costs

>  Customers who are satisfied 

with their new homes  
and would recommend us  
to their friends

Long term sustainable returns
Three times dividend cover
£400m special cash payment programme  
from November 2015 to November 2017
In total £987m1 Capital Return Plan to November 2017

1  See page 9 for further details.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements8

Chairman’s statement

Another year of excellent 
progress.

John Allan
Chairman

Ordinary dividend

 15.1p

per share (2014: 10.3p)

Capital Return Plan

 £987m

over three years ending November 2017 
based on consensus earnings

Delivering performance
This has been another year of excellent 
progress for the Group, delivering 
significantly improved financial returns, a 
consistently strong operating performance 
and continuing to invest in a disciplined 
way to underpin future growth. 

It has also been a year of Board changes 
for us, successfully managing the 
succession of David Thomas as our new 
Chief Executive, and the appointment 
of Neil Cooper as Chief Financial 
Officer Designate. 

The market for new homes remains 
strong across Britain, with demand 
continuing to exceed supply. The mortgage 
market has continued to improve both 
in terms of availability and rates, as well 
as Government support for the new 
build market. 

Against this strong market backdrop we 
are delivering ongoing improvements in 
our own performance across all aspects of 
our operations. 

We continue to focus on a rapid asset turn 
business model that is successfully driving 
up returns. 

Our production capability was underlined 
as we increased completions by 11% to 
16,447 during the year, overcoming a 
number of well publicised housing market 
challenges, particularly labour shortages. 

The fact that we delivered our highest 
completion volumes for seven years whilst 
continuing to lead the industry in terms of 
quality and customer service standards, is 
a great testament to the resilience of our 
operating model, our build programme 
and the dedication of our people. 

For the sixth consecutive year over 90% of 
our home buyers would recommend us to 
a friend – an outstanding achievement. 

As a result of the excellent operating 
performance, we were able to increase 
profit before tax by 45% and we finished 
the year with a net cash balance of 
£186.5m. We are well on the way to hitting 
our FY17 targets of a gross margin of at 
least 20%, and a ROCE of at least 25%.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic Report9

Investing for the future
At the same time as delivering an excellent 
financial performance, we have continued 
to invest for the future. The land market 
has remained attractive in all regions and 
during the year we approved £957m of 
operational land commitments for 16,956 
plots. All of our land approvals continue 
to meet or exceed our investment hurdle 
rates of a 20% gross margin and a 25% 
site ROCE.

During the year we have also made good 
progress in securing a stronger pipeline  
of longer term strategic land. 

Promoting housebuilding
The UK Government recognises the 
importance of additional housing as a 
public policy objective. 

Help to Buy (Equity Loan) in England 
will be continued through to 2020 which 
provides good visibility in terms of our land 
investment strategy. The Government has 
increased it’s land release programme and 
measures to improve the planning system 
are being systematically implemented. 

We will continue to work with the 
Government on their Starter Home 
Scheme that is aimed at supporting 
200,000 homes over the next five years. 

By building more homes we are not only 
helping to address the housing shortage 
but also generating substantial economic 
activity. During the year we estimate that 
we supported 53,000 jobs either directly, 
indirectly or induced. 

Capital Return Plan1

Paid to date2

Proposed payment

November 2015

Year to November 2016

Year to November 2017

Total proposed payment

Total Capital Return Plan

Improving returns for our shareholders
The Board is pleased to propose a final 
dividend of 10.3 pence per share (2014: 7.1 
pence per share). Under our Capital Return 
Plan, special cash payments are proposed 
in addition to ordinary dividends with the 
first special cash payment of £100m to be 
paid in November 2015, which equates to 
10.0 pence per share. 

The total proposed capital return for the 
year is therefore 25.1 pence per share 
(2014: 10.3 pence per share).  

Our employees
The outstanding progress made during 
the year would not have been possible 
without the capability and dedication of 
our employees. 

I am delighted that so many of our team 
now share in our success through our 
Share Save scheme. 

Our site managers were awarded 81 NHBC 
Pride in the Job Awards. This is the 11th 
year in succession that we have secured 
more Pride in the Job Awards than any 
other housebuilder. 

We are also reliant for our success on 
over 12,000 subcontractors and suppliers. 
However, a shortage of high quality, skilled 
labour continues to test the industry and 
limit its output. We remain committed to 
investing in the skills and capability of our own 
employees and working with the industry, 
particularly our subcontractors, to address the 
longer term skill shortages the industry faces. 

Ordinary 
dividend 
£m

118

102
1753,4
1923,4
4693,4

587

Special cash 
payment 
£m

Total Capital 
Return
£m

–

100

125

175

400

400

118

202

300

367

869

987

Total  
pence 
per share

11.9p

20.3p
30.2p4
36.9p4
87.4p4 
99.3p4

1   All final dividends and the special cash payment programme are subject to shareholder approval. The first special cash payment will be 

subject to shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting in November 2015 and subsequent special cash payments will be subject to 
shareholder approval.

2  Comprises FY14 final dividend of 7.1 pence per share (£70m) and FY15 interim dividend of 4.8 pence per share (£48m).

3   Based on Reuters consensus estimates of earnings per share of 52.7 pence for FY16 and 57.9 pence for FY17 as at 4 September 2015 and 

applying a three times dividend cover in line with previously announced policy.

4  Based upon 30 June 2015 share capital of 995,452,663 shares for proposed payments.

The Board
During the year there have been a number 
of significant changes to the Board. 

Bob Lawson who led the Group with 
distinction as Chairman for six years 
retired from the Board on 12 November 
2014. We would like to thank him for his 
excellent service. 

Mark Clare, who had been Group Chief 
Executive since 2006, decided that after 
nearly nine years he wished to retire 
from executive life and develop his non-
executive career. The Board is grateful 
to Mark for the legacy he leaves in terms 
of the financial strength and operational 
capability of the Group; we wish him well 
for the future. Mark was succeeded as 
Chief Executive on 1 July 2015 by David 
Thomas, who joined us as Group Finance 
Director in 2009. We were pleased to have 
such a strong successor in place.

Neil Cooper has been appointed to  
succeed David and will join the Board  
on 23 November 2015 as Chief Financial 
Officer (‘CFO’). Neil is currently Group 
Finance Director of William Hill PLC 
and was Group Finance Director of 
Bovis Homes Group PLC from 2007 
until 2010, so he has a strong CFO track 
record as well as good knowledge of the 
housebuilding sector. 

The Board is confident that the Executive 
Directors – David Thomas, Steven Boyes 
and Neil Cooper – supported by an 
exceptional senior management team,  
will lead the Group effectively. 

The future
The market outlook is strong, we 
have a clear strategy in place and the 
management and operational capability 
to continue delivering improved returns. 
We look forward to another year of 
outstanding performance. 

John Allan 
Chairman

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements10

Key aspects of our market
The market for new homes remains strong across 
Britain, with the housing market as a whole being 
characterised by continued demand and under supply.

UK residential transactions 
over £40,000

Year to 30 June

1,800,000

1,600,000

1,400,000

1,200,000

1,000,000

800,000

600,000

400,000

200,000

0

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

9
0
0
2

0
1
0
2

1
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

4
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

Source: HMRC.

New housing starts 20151

 136,320

(2014: 137,540)  
Source: DCLG.

UK average house prices 20152

£200,280

(2014: £183,180) 
Source: Halifax.

Help to Buy and mortgage availability
Help to Buy (Equity Loan) continues 
to be an important enabler for new 
housebuilding, supporting 22,222 
purchases in England in the ten months 
to April 2015 with 78% of purchasers 
using the scheme being first time buyers 
(source: DCLG). However, the scheme 
has had a limited impact on the wider 
housing market in the UK as it represented 
only 2.6%5 of HMRC residential housing 
transactions in England for the 
same period. 

Average quoted household interest rates 
remain at affordable levels and mortgage 
transaction volumes have remained 
broadly constant over the last year. 
The number of mortgage approvals for 
house purchases fell by 5% to 756,540 
approvals in the year to 30 June 2015 and 
the value of mortgage approvals for house 
purchases fell by 1% to £125,217m (source: 
Bank of England6).

Leithfield Park is a 
development of 2, 3, 4 and 
5 bedroom new homes in 
Milford, Surrey.

The UK economy and housing market
The UK economy continued to grow in 
the 12 months to 30 June 2015, with 
most economic indicators showing 
improvements on the prior year. 

The UK housing market has continued 
to show strength with UK residential 
housing transactions for the year to 
30 June 2015 increasing by 1% on the prior 
year to 1.2 million transactions (source: 
HM Revenue & Customs (‘HMRC’)3). 
The market for new homes remains strong 
across Britain with the housing market as 
a whole being characterised by continued 
demand and under supply.

Housing supply
The supply of new housing has decreased 
slightly, with 136,320 new housing starts 
in the year to 30 June 2015 in England, a 
decrease of 1% on the prior year (source: 
Department for Communities and Local 
Government (‘DCLG’)), although housing 
completions were up 15% on the previous 
year to 131,060 (2014: 114,060)1. Whilst this 
represents a positive move, new housing 
starts remain over 40,000 lower than 
the pre-downturn peak and significantly 
lower than that required to meet demand. 
DCLG estimates that 221,000 homes need 
to be built per annum until 2021 to meet 
the demand from new household creation. 

Obtaining planning permission continues 
to be a constraint for new build 
developments. A number of amendments 
have been made to the planning system 
in recent years, with an increase of 15% in 
planning approvals to 227,374 in the year to 
March 2015 across Great Britain (source: 
Home Builders Federation (‘HBF’)4).

1  DCLG House Building Release June Quarter 2015, England. 

2  Halifax House Price Index June 2015.

3  HMRC UK Property Transaction Statistics June 2015.

4  HBF New Housing Pipeline Q1 2015 Report. 

5   DCLG Help to Buy (Equity Loan) purchases divided by HMRC 
residential transactions in England for the 10 months ending  
30 April 2015.

6  Bank of England Approvals for lending secured on dwellings.

7  Office of National Statistics House Price Index June 2015.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic Report11

New housing starts – 
England

Year to 30 June

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

9
0
0
2

0
1
0
2

1
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

4
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

Source: DCLG.

ONS house price index
12 month percentage change

Year to 30 June

15.0%

10.0%

5.0%

0.0%

–5.0%

–10.0%

–15.0%

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

9
0
0
2

0
1
0
2

1
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

4
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

Source: ONS.

House prices
The shortfall in the supply of housing 
stock and a continued availability of 
mortgage finance at low interest rates 
meant that house prices rose in the year. 
The ONS house price index rose by an 
average of 5.7% per annum across the 
UK in the year to June 20157. The increase 
was particularly marked in the East and 
the South East of England, where the 
ONS house price index rose by 9.2% and 
7.7% respectively in the year to June 
2015. Outside of London and the South 
East, the ONS house price index rose by 
5.2%. According to the Halifax, the UK 
average house price in June 2015 was 
£200,280, which was £17,100 higher than at 
June 2014.

Housing outlook
The underlying demand for new housing 
is expected to remain strong as supply is 
unlikely to meet demand in the medium 
term. We are committed to do our part to 
help address the existing undersupply in 
the market. 

The Government is committed to 
increasing the supply of new homes, we 
have greater clarity on housing policy, and 
in particular believe the extension of the 
Help to Buy (Equity Loan) scheme through 
to 2020 in England will support an increase 
in new housing supply. 

The Rise Scotswood, 
Newcastle, 
Building for Life 
12 Outstanding 
development 
and winner of 
the RICS Award 
for regeneration.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements12

Chief Executive’s statement

Our improved financial  
results have been driven  
by a strong and disciplined 
operational performance. 

David Thomas
Chief Executive

Profit before tax

 £565.5m

(2014: £390.6m)

Return on capital employed

 23.9%

(2014: 19.5%)

Our results 
This has been another very successful financial year for the Group and we have delivered 
strong improvement across all our key financial metrics.

We increased profit before tax by 44.8% to £565.5m and our operating margin improved 
by 230 basis points to 15.3%. ROCE was up by 440 basis points to 23.9% as we continued 
to develop our fast asset turn model of a shorter owned land bank, deferred land 
payments, standardised product and the ability to sell through both our national brands 
on larger sites. 

We have also significantly strengthened our balance sheet, ending the year with net  
cash of £186.5m (2014: £73.1m). 

£m unless otherwise stated

Housebuilding

Commercial

Total

Total completions including JV’s (plots)

Revenue

Gross margin (%)

Profit from operations

Operating margin (%)

Share of post-tax profit/(loss) from joint ventures and associates

16,447

3,702.3

19.0%

570.7

15.4%

45.9

–

57.2

19.6%

6.1

10.7%

(0.2)

16,447

3,759.5

19.0%

576.8

15.3%

45.7

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic Report13

Our businesses
Our improved financial results have 
been driven by a strong and disciplined 
operational performance in both 
our housebuilding and commercial 
developments businesses. 

Housebuilding
With a good level of demand for new 
homes across all six of our operating 
regions, our housebuilding business has 
focused on optimising sales volumes, 
getting the best prices for the homes 
we build, thereby driving financial 
performance. The sales rate for the 
year was 0.64 (2014: 0.69) net private 
reservations per active site per week, 
with a sales rate in the second half of 0.70 
(2014: 0.71) net private reservations per 
active site per week.

There was strength across all regional 
markets, and in particular our Northern 
region delivered a year on year uplift in 
sales rate in the second half, despite a 
strong prior year performance. 

We achieved a significant uplift in the 
rate of new site openings in the financial 
year. In total, the Group launched 176 
(2014: 136) new developments including 
JV’s and at 30 June was operating from 
9% more sites with 399 (2014: 366) active 
sites (including JV’s). Looking ahead, we 
expect to see further controlled growth in 
site numbers in FY16 of around 3%.

Completions for the full year including 
JV’s were up 11% at 16,447 (2014: 14,838). 
Private completions increased by 7% 
to 12,746 (2014: 11,936), affordable 
completions were 2,853 (2014: 2,255), 
and JV completions in which the Group 
had an interest were 848 (2014: 647). 
This represents our highest level of 
completions in seven years, and Barratt 
London completed a record volume of 
1,965 units including JV’s. 

Oak Court, Bishop Sutton,  
a development of 3, 4, and 5 
bedroom Barratt Homes in 
the Chew Valley, Somerset.

We continue to increase the proportion 
of completions that are on more recently 
acquired higher margin land and these 
accounted for 76% (2014: 65%) of the total 
in the year. We have also continued to 
take advantage of the stronger market 
conditions to increase the rate of sale on 
older lower margin sites. This will bring 
forward our exit from these sites and help 
to drive up returns in the medium term. 

Help to Buy (Equity Loan) has provided 
a very attractive opportunity for our 
customers, especially for first time buyers. 
During the year 31% (2014: 31%) of our 
total completions (excluding JV’s) used the 
scheme. The contribution from investor 
sales, which are predominantly in our 
London region, fell slightly in the year to 
11% (2014: 12%) of total completions.

Our total average selling price 
(‘ASP’) increased by 7% to £235,000 
(2014: £219,900) in the financial year 
with our private average selling 
price increasing by 9% to £262,500 
(2014: £241,600). This year on year 
increase reflects both further mix changes 
and underlying house price inflation. 
We expect to see some further increase 
in ASP driven by changes in mix in FY16, 
with the total ASP in our owned land bank 
increasing to £252,000 as at 30 June 2015 
(2014: £227,000).

Affordable average selling price increased 
by 7% to £112,300 (2014: £105,300) 
reflecting changes in mix, with affordable 
completions increasing to 18% (2014: 16%) 
of total completions.

Our JV’s have performed well and our 
share of profits from JV’s in FY15 for 
the housebuilding business increased 
to £45.6m (2014: £40.8m). As at 30 June 
2015 we were selling from 16 (2014: 8) JV 
sites and expect the share of profits from 
JV’s to increase to around £60m in FY16. 
For our London region, the proportion of 
completions from JV sites versus non-JV 
sites is expected to increase significantly in 
FY16, in particular driven by completions 
from Fulham Riverside in Fulham, Enderby 
Wharf in Greenwich and Nine Elms Point 
in Vauxhall.

Targeted land buying
A key driver of the transformation of our 
business in recent years has been our 
land investment strategy. Since 2009 
we have approved the investment of 
£4.8bn in land for new homes and this 
has boosted returns and led to increased 
completion volumes.

During the year conditions in the land 
market remained encouraging in terms 
of the availability of attractive high return 
sites across all regions. We successfully 
continued our investment strategy of 
targeting high quality operational land 
that meets or exceeds our minimum 
hurdle rates set on acquisition; a 20% 
gross margin and a 25% site ROCE. In the 
year we committed to land expenditure of 
£957.0m (2014: £1,198.1m) covering 16,956 
plots (2014: 21,478 plots), the appropriate 
level to maintain our controlled land bank 
at our target of c. 4.5 years. As at 30 June 
2015 our owned and controlled land bank 
stood at 70,523 plots equating to 4.5 years 
of production.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements14

Strategic Report – Chief Executive’s statement continued

Private ASP

£262,500

(2014: £241,600)

Approved land purchases

£957.0m

(2014: £1,198.1m)

Fulham Riverside,  
a development of 472 flats  
and townhouses on the  
River Thames in London. 

Public land remains an excellent source of 
land for the Group. The Government has 
increased its commitment to releasing 
public sector land with 150,000 plots to be 
delivered by 2020. In the more competitive 
South East and London land markets, 
public land is an important alternative 
source of land supply. Barratt is very well 
positioned to maximise this opportunity 
with our unique public sector land team 
and membership of all HCA Delivery 
Partner Panels. We have the expertise 
and the capability to secure and deliver 
what are often large and highly complex 
developments. Our track record 
demonstrates this with 70% of bids 
won over the past year. Our public land 
developments achieve at least 20% hurdle 
rate gross margin with ROCE generally 
significantly higher than our 25% hurdle 
rate, reflecting the attractive deferred 
payment terms often available.

As we progress the transformation of 
our operational land bank, the Group is 
focused on securing our longer term land 
supply. Through the acquisition of options 
over strategic land we are focused on 
securing our land pipeline out to 2020 and 
beyond, whilst minimising risk and capital 
employed. We made further good progress 
in the year, with a strategic portfolio of 
71,600 plots (2014: 69,200 plots) equating 
to 284 sites (2014: 260 sites). We have 
seen a significant step up in the delivery 
of strategic land, with 17% (2014: 10%) of 
total completions being delivered from 
strategically sourced land in the year, 
progressing towards our target of 20% 
in FY17.

We have been encouraged by the capability 
of our business to bring forward land 
through the planning system within the 
context of the National Planning Policy 
Framework. We now have full or outline 
planning permission in place for all of our 
expected completions in FY16 and 89% of 
expected production in FY17. 

Improving efficiency and reducing costs
Improving the efficiency of our operations 
and controlling costs has continued to be a 
high priority for the Group in a recovering 
market. We are pleased that overall build 
cost inflation for FY15 has been limited to 
c. 3.5%, in line with expectations, and for 
FY16 we expect build costs to increase by a 
similar amount. 

We have a robust and carefully managed 
supply chain with 85% of our build 
materials sourced through our centralised 
procurement function. We have effectively 
sourced the raw materials required to 
underpin our controlled volume growth 
and over 90% of our material costs are 
now fixed until the end of FY16. 

On labour, whilst we have seen an increase 
in the supply of skilled subcontractors 
over the past year, there remains an 
industry shortage, with increases in 
labour costs remaining the largest driver 
of overall build cost inflation. We are 
well placed and continue to have the 
necessary labour to meet our operational 
and quality requirements. We are also 
seeking to increase efficiency through 
the use of timber frame on some of our 
sites and the use of alternative off-site 
manufacturing options, including closed 
panel roof solutions.  

More generally on costs, we have 
continued to focus on the broader 
efficiency of our business with process 
reviews being undertaken in the areas of 
commercial, sales and marketing. 

Commercial developments
Outside London and the South East, the 
commercial occupier market is showing 
signs of increasing confidence. Since the 
downturn, demand has been mainly 
satisfied by the availability of second-hand 
space and with this accommodation now 
largely filled, occupiers have turned their 
attention to new commercial build. This is 
presenting cost challenges as a result 
of the reduction in construction capacity 
following the downturn. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201515

Demand is currently driven by 
e-commerce logistics requirements 
and in the last 12 months we have seen 
the return of institutional funding to 
this sector. We have used institutional 
funding for 600,000 sq. ft. of logistics 
buildings, with a further 200,000 sq. ft. 
in the immediate pipeline. Wilson Bowden 
Developments is also now focusing 
on mixed use residential and leisure 
schemes, such as in Hounslow, where 
together with Barratt London, it has 
entered into a conditional contract with 
the Local Authority to deliver 120,000 sq. 
ft. of commercial leisure facilities and 
530 flats.

Commercial development revenue was 
£57.2m (2014: £14.4m) with an operating 
profit of £6.1m (2014: loss of £1.0m). 
Our Hinckley scheme, which comprises 
200,000 sq. ft. of retail and leisure space, 
achieved completion of the foodstore 
element during the year with full project 
completion due in FY16 along with our 
Derby development, which comprises a 
hotel and 46 flats. 

Going forward our commercial division 
will work closely with our housebuilding 
business to develop mixed-use schemes, 
and will seek to develop independent 
commercial schemes where they can 
be forward funded by third parties prior 
to commencement.

Our objectives
Our strategic objectives remain clear – to 
continue to build the Group’s profitability, 
drive return on capital employed and 
maintain an appropriate capital structure, 
whilst offering attractive cash returns to 
our shareholders. 

We have made further good progress 
against these objectives in the year with 
gross margin increasing by 220 basis 
points to 19.0% (2014: 16.8%) and ROCE 
increasing by 440 basis points to 23.9% 
(2014: 19.5%). The Group ended the year 
with net cash of £186.5m (2014: net 
cash £73.1m) and land creditors at 35% 
(2014: 33%) of the owned land bank.

We continue to make very good progress 
towards achieving our FY17 targets of at 
least 20% gross margin and at least 25% 
ROCE and are committed to delivering 
them as early as possible. In particular, 
the run-down of the Group’s low or 
zero margin legacy assets will drive 
improvements in ROCE.

This strong financial performance 
supports the Group’s Capital Return Plan 
and dividend policy. We are delighted to 
propose a final dividend of 10.3 pence 
per share (2014: 7.1 pence per share) 
resulting in a total ordinary dividend 
for the year up 46.6% to 15.1 pence per 
share (2014: 10.3 pence per share) and 
the first of our special cash payments 
totalling £100m, equivalent to 10.0 pence 
per share, payable in November 2015. 
This reflects our ordinary dividend policy 
of the dividend being covered three times 
by earnings, supplemented by the special 
cash payments to November 2017 totalling 
£400m.

Health and safety
Increased activity levels across the industry 
in terms of site openings and production 
volumes combined with shortages of skilled 
staff has increased the risks of accidents on 
sites. In the twelve months to 30 June 2015 
we had 381 (2014: 379) reportable incidents 
per 100,000 employees. We remain focused 
on continuing to enhance health and 
safety performance across our business. 
We have established a Board level Safety, 
Health and Environment Committee in the 
year, had our safety management status 
independently assessed by the British 
Safety Council which awarded us five star 
status, and introduced a number of new 
initiatives including our ‘Five Steps to Safety’ 
programme to promote the importance  
of a safe working environment.

Our priorities 
To continue to deliver leading financial 
performance and maximise sustainable 
returns for our shareholders by focusing 
upon our clear set of priorities – Customer 
First, Great Places, Leading Construction 
and Investing in our People. 

Each of these priorities has a work 
plan to drive improvements across the 
business and they are supported by 
a set of principles that underpin all of 
our operations. 

Customer first
We place customers at the heart of our 
business by building outstanding homes 
and anticipating the changing needs of 
home buyers. 

We are the only major national 
housebuilder to achieve the Home Builders 
Federation Five Star quality status for 
six consecutive years, with over 90% of 
customers being prepared to recommend 
us to a friend. 

We are continuing to improve the quality 
and efficiency of the way in which we deal 
with customers through the sales process. 
During the year new customer service 
systems were rolled out to divisions to 
speed up and improve the efficiency of our 
service and a new customer contact centre 
was put in place. 

We have introduced a ‘Future Homes’ 
project to inform design direction in terms 
of customer trends and preferences. 
As well as carefully defining customer 
segments and their design preferences, 
we are working with The Architects’ 
Journal to select new house design 
features to meet these requirements. 

Great places
A key focus of the organisation continues to 
be building relationships with landowners 
to ensure that we can acquire the right 
land and then create outstanding places 
to live. Our objective is to be the partner of 
choice for landowners by demonstrating 
our ability to achieve planning permission 
and create value. 

During the year we made significant 
progress in terms of securing the right 
operational land, continued our success in 
winning public sector land and increased 
investment in longer term strategic sites.

We are now using the Design Council/
CABE Building for Life process extensively 
and are winning more design awards than 
any other major housebuilder. We have 
now achieved Building for Life awards on 
33 sites. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements16

Strategic Report – Chief Executive’s statement continued

Leading construction 
We are focused on a ‘right first time’ 
approach as the most efficient way 
of operating across all aspects of our 
building processes with a continuous 
focus on improving build quality. 
During the year we analysed thousands 
of comments from our customers and 
used them to identify where we needed to 
enhance the quality of some components. 
This ‘getting it right first time’ approach 
will drive improved efficiency through 
reducing remedial costs and improve 
customer satisfaction. 

We are implementing a number of  
quick wins in terms of lowering build 
costs, for example we expect to build  
c. 1,300 timber frame homes in FY16. 
Other innovations in the build process 
implemented during the year include  
new roofing and flooring solutions  
and we have started to trial other  
new products having assessed over  
100 off-site construction suppliers. 
We are also looking to embrace the best 
methods of on and off-site construction  
to increase efficiency.

Our site managers continue to lead  
the industry and during the year we  
won 81 NHBC Pride in the Job awards. 
This was the 11th year in succession that 
our site managers have won more of 
these awards than any other company. 

Ian and Jane Jennings, pictured with sales 
adviser Catherine Moane, chose a new home 
at Serenity, Doncaster, allowing them to 
downsize and be closer to their family.

Investing in our people
The building and construction industry 
continues to face a shortage of skilled 
workers and attracting and retaining the 
best people is an important priority for 
the business. We aim to have a diverse 
workforce that reflects the communities in 
which we operate, delivering excellence for 
our customers and business by drawing on a 
diverse range of talent, skills and experience.  

We have continued with our graduate 
and apprentice programmes and have 
recruited our largest ever intake of future 
talent. In addition, we have trained or 
are training 60 employees through our 
Foundation Degree Programme with 
Sheffield Hallam University. 

We are piloting a Regional Academy in 
our East region targeting a wider mix of 
potential employees and are continuing 
to support the wider industry focus on 
addressing the skills shortage. 

Current trading
The sales performance across the Group 
has been strong for the first 10 weeks 
of FY16, with net private reservations 
per week of 257 (FY15: 224), resulting in 
average net private reservations per active 
site per week of 0.68 (FY15: 0.62). 

Our total forward sales (including JV’s) 
as at 6 September 2015 were up 32.2% on 
the strong prior year figures at a value of 
£2,321.9m (7 September 2014: £1,755.7m), 
equating to 10,755 plots (7 September 
2014: 8,507 plots).

We expect FY 16 full year completion 
volumes for the Group to be around 
15,750, plus around 1,000 completions 
delivered through our JV portfolio giving 
total completions of around 16,750 
(FY15: 16,447) in line with our target of 
controlled volume growth. 

Forward sales

6 September  
2015

7 September  
2014

Variance  

£m

Plots

£m

Plots

%

Private

1,332.3

4,788 1,145.6

4,458

Affordable

512.2

4,487

360.3

3,224

Sub total

1,844.5

9,275 1,505.9

7,682

JV

Total

477.4

1,480

249.8

825

2,321.9 10,755 1,755.7

8,507

16.3

42.2

22.5

91.1

32.2

Outlook
The fundamentals for the market 
remain very positive with strong 
demand for new housing across Britain. 
The lending environment is supportive 
with the borrowing rates on offer to our 
customers remaining at extremely low 
levels. The Government is committed to 
increasing the supply of new homes, we 
have greater clarity on housing policy, 
and in particular believe the extension 
of the Help to Buy (Equity Loan) Scheme 
through to 2020 in England will support an 
increase in new housing supply. The land 
market remains attractive and we continue 
to secure excellent new development 
opportunities across all regions that at 
least meet our minimum hurdle rates.

I am proud to lead our first class team 
and we are all determined to build 
on our outstanding operational and 
financial performance and to drive 
further efficiencies across the business. 
Current trading is strong, we are confident 
on the outlook, and expect to make further 
good progress in the current financial year.

David Thomas 
Chief Executive

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201517

a Our priorities

a Our principles

Customer  
first

see page18

Great  
places

see page 22

Leading 
construction

see page 26

Investing in 
our people

see page 30

Keeping 
people safe

see page 34

Being a 
trusted partner

see page 35

Building strong  
community  
relationships

see page 36

Safeguarding the  
environment

see page 37

Ensuring the 
financial health  
of our business

see page 38

Delivering  
sustainable  
shareholder 
value

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements18

Strategic Report – Priorities in action

a Our strategy

 > Our priority is building 

great homes and providing 
an outstanding customer 
experience. We seek to anticipate 
our customers’ evolving needs 
by continuously improving the 
homes and places we build.

Building Excellence by putting  

customers 
first

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201519

We carefully consider 
customer preferences in the 
development of our product 
ranges. Our layouts are 
designed with free-flowing 
living areas and natural light.

a KPI

 5

HBF 5 Star Homebuilder1

a Key highlights

 > Mortgage market continues  

to improve 

 > Only national housebuilder to be 

awarded HBF 5 Star status for six 
consecutive years

 > Continue to invest in customer 

service 

 > Acting upon research into 

customer needs 

1   Key performance indicator used to assess performance for 

annual incentive scheme.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements20

Strategic Report – Priorities in action continued

All of our team  
are responsible for 
delivering customer 
satisfaction. 

Jemma Booker 
and Robert Bennie 
purchased their 
first home at 
The Hedgerows, 
Thurcroft.

The challenge
Britain needs more homes to 
address its housing shortage, with 
growing demand in the market and 
continued undersupply of new homes. 
Home buyers are supported by an 
improving mortgage market in terms of 
both availability and rates, as well as the 
Government’s Help to Buy (Equity Loan) 
scheme in England. 

The industry is seeking to increase 
volumes, maintain customer satisfaction 
and build quality and at the same time 
address the constraint created by a 
shortage of skilled people. 

Affordability of homes and 
accessibility to home ownership
We build a wide range of product, 
from homes for first time buyers 
to larger family homes. Our private 
average selling price for the year was 
£262,500 (2014: £241,600); £246,800 
(2014: £222,200) outside of London. 

During the year the mortgage market has 
remained positive. Our customers have 
access to mortgage finance that allows 
them to buy with a 5% deposit in England 
through the Help to Buy (Equity Loan) 
scheme and there is also an increase in 
the range of higher loan to value products 
which do not use the Help to Buy scheme 
available. We continue to work with a 
broad set of lenders through our approved 
brokers to ensure that our customers have 
access to independent advice and a wide 
range of mortgage products. 

We delivered 2,853 (2014: 2,255)
affordable homes built for registered 
providers, equating to 18% (2014: 16%) of 
our total completions in the year. We have 
a team which engages with housing 
association partners at local, regional 
and national levels. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201521

Jack and Rose Ducker 
and their children 
moved to a larger home 
at Paddock View in 
Leicestershire using 
Help to Buy. 

We place customers 
at the heart of 
everything we do.

Customer satisfaction 
We place customers at the heart of 
everything we do, with their satisfaction 
being a key performance indicator at all 
levels of management. All of our team 
are responsible for delivering customer 
satisfaction and we have developed a 
Customer Service Academy comprising 
both classroom and online training to 
ensure that our employees understand 
how to deliver right first time, every 
time. During the year, 513 employees 
have participated in this programme. 
We have also launched a new Code 
of Conduct for our subcontractors to 
support customer satisfaction. 

We are pleased that we have increased 
our completions delivery, including 
JV’s, by 11% during the year whilst 
retaining our HBF 5 Star status for the 
sixth successive year, the only national 
housebuilder to do so. We regularly 
review the results from the NHBC 
customer survey with the insights gained 
being used to aid our decision making. 

We continue to drive customer 
service, investing in technology from 
developments to our customer service 
systems and our onsite systems to aid our 
quality control inspections. Each home we 
build is repeatedly inspected at key stages 
and, as a minimum, is approved by the site 
manager, contracts manager and sales 
staff before handover to our customers. 
Management throughout the business 
are responsible for customer service and 
monitor customer satisfaction survey 
performance on a weekly basis.

Increasing customer insight
To ensure that we continuously reflect our 
customers’ needs we have undertaken 
customer research in a number of areas 
during the year including demographics 
and home design. In response to our 
research we have launched a downsizer 
range to meet the needs of older property 
owners approaching retirement. We are 
considering current and future trends 
in home design to influence our design 
strategy and have also conducted a 
competition for architects with The 
Architects’ Journal to design future 
features for our homes. 

Above: The Bartram 
family purchased their 
new home at Orchid 
Fields in Kempton.

Left: Gary Chan 
recently bought 
an apartment at 
Greenland Place, 
London using  
Help to Buy.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements22

Strategic Report – Priorities in action continued

a Our strategy

 > Our strategy is building long term 

relationships to secure good 
value land where people aspire 
to live. We design developments 
which look great, are a pleasure 
to live on, and will enhance local 
communities for years to come.

Building Excellence by developing  

great 
 places

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201523

A view of the David Wilson 
Ashcroft Place development 
in the village of Thundersley, 
Essex, taken from the Aaron 
Lewis Memorial Park.

a KPI

Owned and controlled land bank

Land approvals plots1

4.5 years

(2014: 4.7 years)1

1   Key performance indicator used to assess performance for 

annual incentive scheme.

21,478

18,536

16,956

12,085

8,861

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

a Key highlights

 > Continue to see high quality 
land opportunities across 
all regions 

 > Transformation of our land 

bank to more recently acquired 
higher margin land is well 
progressed 

 > Detailed or outline planning 
permission on all of FY16 
expected completions and 89% 
of FY17 expected completions 
 > All new developments designed 

using the Design Council 
Building for Life criteria

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements 
24

Strategic Report – Priorities in action continued

Land approved for purchase

Year ended 
30 June 2015

Year ended 
30 June 2014

£957.0m £1,198.1m

16,956

21,478

Total

Total (plots)

Location

– South : North (by value)2 

52% : 48% 45% : 55%

– South : North (by plots)2

40% : 60% 35% : 65%

Government : Private  
(by plots) 

30% : 70% 18% : 82%

Houses : Flats (by plots)

82% : 18% 84% : 16%

The challenge
The future of our business depends 
upon securing the right land in the right 
place that achieves our investment 
hurdle rates. 

ROCE on completed new sites 
acquired since 2009 

38%

Acres of strategic land

 c. 11,100

(2014: c. 10,900)

Securing the best land
We continue to see high quality land 
opportunities across all regions that at 
least meet our required hurdle rates of 
a gross margin of 20% and a site ROCE 
of 25%1. 

Our success in buying land is based on 
the extensive local knowledge of our 
divisional land teams and strong local 
relationships with land owners, combined 
with detailed assessments of local market 
conditions. We target locations based on 
the availability of land, housing market 
conditions and the likelihood of obtaining 
planning consent.

We continue to target a regionally balanced 
land portfolio with a supply of owned and 
controlled land of approximately 4.5 years. 
As at 30 June 2015, we achieved our target 
with a 4.5 year land supply (excluding JV’s) 
comprising 3.3 years of owned land, and 
1.2 years of conditionally contracted land.

1   Site ROCE on land acquisition is calculated as site operating 

profit (site trading profit less overheads less allocated 
administrative overheads) divided by average investment in site 
land, work in progress and equity share.

2   South relates to Southern, West and London regions, North 

relates to Northern, Central and East regions as set out on page 3.

The Orchards 
in Hardwicke, 
Gloucestershire 
offers homes from 
the Barratt core 
product range.

Our customers 
want to live in 
great places.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201525

Our land bank
The transformation of our land bank 
from older low margin land to more 
recently acquired high margin land is 
well progressed. As at 30 June 2015, 
90% (2014: 84%) of our owned and 
controlled land is high margin, newer 
land. On sites completed to date that 
were acquired since 2009 we have 
generated a gross margin of 21% 
and a 38% site ROCE, demonstrating 
sustained delivery above our hurdle 
rates upon more recently acquired land. 

Whilst maintaining a first class 
operational land bank, we are also 
focused on securing a longer term 
land pipeline, in particular through the 
acquisition of options over strategic land. 
In the year, 5,239 plots (2014: 5,205 plots) 
were transferred from strategic land to 
our owned land bank. With 17% of FY15 
completions from strategically sourced 
land, we are on track to deliver our 
target of c. 20% of our completions to be 
delivered from strategic land in FY17. 

We use land creditors to defer payments 
for land acquisition where possible to 
drive a higher ROCE and as at 30 June 
2015, the land creditor position totalled 
£999.0m (30 June 2014: £779.4m) 
representing 35% (30 June 2014: 33%) of 
the owned land bank. We are targeting 
land creditors at around one third of the 
owned land bank for FY16. 

Our land bank

Owned and unconditional land bank (plots)

Conditionally contracted land bank (plots)

Owned and controlled land bank (plots)

Effective planning permission
An important part of bringing land into 
production is the planning process. 
Following the implementation of the 
Government’s National Planning Policy 
Framework, we welcome the further 
measures put in place to ensure local 
authorities have a five-year land supply. 
This is leading to an improved dialogue 
between local authorities and our 
divisions. Nevertheless, the planning 
process remains a lengthy one and 
affects the speed at which housing supply 
can increase.

We have maintained good momentum in 
achieving planning consents, and during 
the year we secured planning on 17,092 
plots (2014: 21,004 plots). We now have full 
or outline planning permission in place 
for all of our expected completions in FY16 
and 89% of expected production in FY17.

Designing great places
Designing great places is fundamental 
to our business: our customers want to 
live in great places; the vendors of the 
land we purchase want to work with 
developers who leave behind a legacy 
of design quality; and local people 
want developments that enhance their 
communities. We are focused upon 
placemaking throughout our business and 
use the Design Council/CABE Building 
for Life process in the design of all new 
developments, as well as our internal 
‘Great Places’ guidance and the expertise 
of our urban design team. We also review 
our development layouts to ensure they 
achieve both design quality and efficient 
land use.

We have been awarded Building for Life 
commendations on 33 sites, significantly 
more than other housebuilders. 

Designing great 
places is fundamental 
to our business.

The Sidings, 
Swindon, a former 
Great Western 
Railway site.

30 June 2015

30 June 2014

51,640

18,883

70,523

47,892

18,678

66,570

Number of years’ supply based upon completions in the financial year

4.5 years

4.7 years

JV’s owned and controlled land bank (plots)

Approved land (plots)

Strategic land (acres)

Potential delivery from strategic land (plots)

Land bank carrying value

Average housebuilding cost per plot

Cash expenditure on land in the financial year

6,325

4,625

7,163

5,326

c. 11,100

c. 10,900 

c. 71,600

c. 69,200

£2,826.1m

£2,348.4m

£52,200

£46,400

£970.0m

£814.0m

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements26

Strategic Report – Priorities in action continued

a Our strategy

 > We deliver the highest 

quality homes by focusing on 
excellence across all aspects of 
construction. We are embracing 
the best new methods of on and 
off-site construction to increase 
build efficiency.

Building Excellence by  

leading 
construction

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201527

Nine Elms Point is an award 
winning development of 
645 flats, located next  
to the future Zone 1  
Nine Elms underground 
station in London.

a KPI

Total completions including  
joint ventures units

Total completions including
joint ventures units

  +11%

on 2014

16,447

14,838

12,857

13,663

11,171

a Key highlights

 > Focused on a ‘right first time’ 
approach to drive operating 
efficiency

 > Long term relationships with 
suppliers and subcontractors
 > Considering and implementing 

new construction methods 
where appropriate

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements 
28

Strategic Report – Priorities in action continued

 Our site managers 
continue to lead the 
industry, winning 81 
NHBC Pride in the 
Job Awards. 

Kirk Raine, a site manager in 
our Mercia division, has won 
NHBC Pride in the Job Awards 
in each of the last five years 
and a National NHBC Health & 
Safety Award in 2014. 

The challenge
The housing shortage has increased 
demand for the building of new homes, 
which has resulted in pressures upon 
the availability of materials and skilled 
labour and subcontractors. 

Delivering high quality homes
We put customer satisfaction at the 
heart of our construction processes with 
a focus upon getting it right first time, 
which also drives operating efficiencies 
in the build process. Our site managers 
continue to lead the industry, winning 81 
NHBC Pride in the Job Awards. This is 
the 11th consecutive year that we have 
won more of these awards than any 
other housebuilder. 

NHBC Pride in the Job Award 
winners

 81

for 2015

Partnering with our supply chain
We have a centralised procurement 
team which has built long term 
relationships with our suppliers. 
This ensures the consistency of 
specification and technical performance 
of the materials used in our homes. 
Long term relationships have enabled 
us to ensure the continuous availability 
of materials as demand increased. 
We also use many local subcontractors 
in the construction of our homes, who 
our divisions partner with at a local level 
to ensure the availability of the skilled 
trades that we require.

We engage in continuous communication 
with our suppliers and hold regular 
performance and business reviews, 
training days and an annual supplier 
conference. We are a signatory of the 
Prompt Payment Code. 

We purchase substantial amounts 
of timber and have implemented a 
sustainable procurement and timber 
sourcing policy. Since December 2013,  
all timber and timber products that we  
use are FSC/PEFC certified and 
originate from well managed 
forestry sources.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201529

Closed panel roof 
systems installed 
at our sites at 
Beechwood in the 
North East, above, 
and Kibworth 
Green in the North 
Midlands, below.

Innovating to improve efficiency
We constantly review the latest 
available technologies to assist us 
in meeting evolving regulations, 
increases in predicted demand and 
material availability. 

The majority of our homes are built with 
traditional brick and block construction, 
although we are increasing the use of 
timber frame on some of our sites and 
expect to build c. 1,300 homes using this 
method during FY16. 

To increase efficiency we are also 
looking to embrace new construction 
methods and have assessed over 100 
off-site suppliers. An example of an 
innovation in the build process that we 
have implemented during the year is the 
use of closed panel roofs to replace attic 
trusses or traditional trusses on some 
sites. These have a number of benefits:

 > Health and safety – the amount 
of work carried out at height is 
significantly reduced;

 > Efficiency – the process reduces waste 

generated on site, helps to reduce 
on site traffic movements and is less 
impacted by inclement weather;

 > Speed – taking a roof from wall plate 

to watertight will generally take 
a day compared to a week using 
traditional means;

 > Quality – factory controlled quality 

assurance; and 

 > Extra floor space – additional space 

is created. 

We have engaged with our suppliers to 
find, understand and consider innovative 
products and services from across the 
supply chain. 

We are also researching smart 
technologies and their use in future 
homes to improve the ability of 
customers to save energy and are 
currently undertaking divisional pilots 
of smart thermostats, which give 
customers the ability to remotely control 
their heating systems. 

In order to increase 
efficiency we are looking  
to embrace new 
construction methods. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements30

Strategic Report – Priorities in action continued

a Our strategy

 > We aim to attract and retain the 
best people by investing in their 
development and success. We 
seek to create a great place to 
work, founded on an open and 
honest culture that embraces 
diversity and inclusion.

Building Excellence by  

investing in 
our people

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201531

Jack Livingstone,  
one of our apprentices, and 
James Evinson at work at 
Bedford Meadows.

a KPI

Upper quartile employee 
engagement1,2

 78%

(2014: 78%)

a Key highlights

 > Continue to invest in our  
‘Future Talent’ strategy 
 > Committed to providing an 

inclusive working environment
 > Award winning apprenticeship 

training programme

1   Assessed against the UK all sectors comparator group  

by IBM Kenexa.

2   Key performance indicator used to assess performance  

for annual incentive scheme.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements32

Strategic Report – Priorities in action continued

The challenge
The building and construction industry 
continues to face a shortage of skilled 
workers and attracting and retaining 
the best people is a key priority for 
our business. 

Attracting people to our industry
Together with other housebuilders 
we are working with the HBF and the 
Construction Industry Training Board to 
improve the image of housebuilding as 
a career choice and promote the career 
opportunities in the sector through the 
recruitment of experienced workers, 
targeted online resources, a regional 
academy pilot and by becoming a patron of 
the West Midlands Construction Industry 
University Technical College. 

Employee retention
During the year staff turnover increased 
to 19% (2014: 16%) reflecting the 
demand and opportunities for skilled 
employees. We therefore continue to 
focus upon developing talent within our 
business, including succession planning, 
to ensure that we have the necessary 
skills within our business for continued 
operational delivery. 

Developing talent
We are committed to the development of 
our people and assisting in increasing the 
housebuilding skills base in order to drive 
our success. We offer both vocational 
and leadership training programmes, 
as well as in-house schemes promoting 
employee development, engagement 
and recognition.

The Barratt Academy continues to 
provide structured, bespoke training to 
support individual development across 
three separate disciplines; apprentices, 
site managers and technical/commercial 
roles. Courses combine professional 
training (on site and in the classroom) 
with industry recognised qualifications.

We continue to invest in and develop our 
‘Future Talent’ strategy. In February 2014, 
we targeted the recruitment of 1,100 
graduates, apprentices and paid interns 
over three years. Whilst we have not yet 
achieved this target, we have made good 
progress having recruited 792 including 
those who will join us during FY16.

Our apprentice scheme was externally 
recognised through the award of the 
2014 National Apprenticeship scheme BT 
Macro Employer of the Year for employers 
with over 5,000 employees.

Investing in talent

792 

graduates, apprentices and paid interns 
recruited from FY14 to the end FY16

Awarded
BT Macro Employer 
of the Year 2014

National Apprenticeship scheme BT Macro 
Employer of the Year for employers with over 
5,000 employees

We are 
committed to  
the development 
of our people.

Above: Darren Frost, a third year apprentice 
electrician at Trumpington Meadows, 
Cambridge.

Left: Our 2014 graduate intake.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201533

Our two-year graduate programme 
continues to be a success. We were 
delighted to be ranked first in The Job 
Crowd’s ‘Top Companies For Graduates 
To Work For’ across all companies 
in 2014. 

We offer a number of entry level 
programmes in addition to our award 
winning graduate and apprentice 
programmes. Our paid undergraduate 
internship programme supports 
students studying relevant degrees 
through a 48-week industrial 
placement. During the programme, 
interns complete ‘mini rotations’ 
to learn about our business before 
specialising in one area for the 
remainder of the year. Those who 
perform well are offered a permanent 
position with us upon completion of 
their degree. 

We also have ‘accelerated programmes’ 
in sales or construction for graduates 
who want to fast-track their learning in 
a job role, with the aim of progressing 
through to management positions in 
the future. 

Engaging our people
As a business we believe that an engaged 
workforce is critical to our success. 
We conduct an annual employee 
engagement survey in order to gain 
valuable insight into how our people feel 
about working for us. We are delighted 
that in our annual employee engagement 
survey we achieved our upper quartile 
target with an index of 78%, which is 
above the UK employers’ norm of 72%. 
We develop and implement action plans 
following each survey to strengthen our 
business and to continue our position of 
being an employer of choice. 

We have a ‘Get Recognised’ programme 
which allows our people to be rewarded 
by colleagues for a job well done 
with instant awards of £100 cash or a 
days holiday. We also recognise the 
outstanding contributions of our people 
through quarterly awards for sales staff, 
apprentices and site managers as well as 
via individual and team excellence awards. 
Around 1,000 awards were made through 
these schemes in the last year.

Diversity and inclusion
We are committed to providing an inclusive 
working environment where everyone 
feels valued and respected. We aim to 
have a diverse workforce that reflects 
the communities in which we operate, 
delivering excellence for our customers 
and business by drawing on a diverse 
range of talents, skills and experience. 

The table below shows the number 
of men and women employed, as at 
30 June 2015, across our business split 
between PLC Directors, Senior Managers 
and Employees.

The diversity policy relating to the 
appointment of PLC Directors is set out on 
page 99.

A diversity and inclusion regional pilot 
increased applications from, and the 
recruitment of, a more diverse workforce 
in our East region. We now plan to apply 
this across our business during the next 
year to help increase the diversity of 
our people. 

Human rights
We support the United Nations’ Universal 
Declaration of Human Rights and have 
policies and processes in place to ensure 
that we act in accordance with our 
principles in relation to areas such as anti-
corruption, diversity and whistleblowing.

Our 81 2015 Pride in the 
Job Award winners at a 
celebratory dinner.

Men and women employed

30 June 2015

30 June 2014

              Men

          Women

              Men

          Women

Number

% Number

6

250

3,875

4,131

75

87

68

69

2

37

1,801

1,840

%

25

13

32

31

Total

Number

% Number

8

287

5,676

5,971

6

238

3,674

3,918

75

88

67

68

2

34

1,801

1,837

%

25

12

33

32

Total

8

272

5,475

5,755

PLC Directors

Senior Managers

Employees

Total workforce

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements34

Strategic Report – Our principles
Keeping people safe

Our overall aim is to have an injury free 
working environment, and whilst we 
believe that all injuries are avoidable, 
our objective for the year was to have 
an improvement in our reportable 
Injury Incidence Rate (‘IIR’). During the 
year, our IIR increased by 1% to 381 
(2014: 379) per 100,000 persons employed 
(including subcontractors). Whilst we are 
disappointed that our IIR has not reduced 
during the year, we have continued to 
introduce new initiatives to improve our 
health and safety performance including 
a ‘Five Steps to Safety’ programme for 
site workers. We also engaged the British 
Safety Council to conduct an Occupational 
Health and Safety Audit during the year, 
and following this we were awarded five 
star status. This audit highlighted the 
importance of a proactive approach to 
safety management and encouraging 
the promotion of outstanding individual 
site initiatives. 

The challenge and our response
Increased activity levels across the 
industry in terms of both site openings 
and production volumes combined with 
shortages of skilled staff has increased 
the risks of accidents on sites. We seek to 
maintain stringent safety standards and 
a continuous focus on health and safety 
issues. Getting the basics right, good 
leadership, and commitment to health 
and safety from all levels of management 
is what delivers good health and safety 
performance in our business. In order 
to enhance the leadership of health 
and safety in our business, a Board 
level Safety, Health and Environmental 
Committee was established in July 2014. 

Our Safety, Health and Environmental 
management system (‘SHE’) is subject 
to continuous review and improvement. 
All of our trading divisions are certified 
to OHSAS 18001 and adhere to our SHE 
guidelines with their ongoing compliance 
being verified by a programme of 
internal and external audits. During the 
year, we carried out 6,269 (2014: 5,788) 
monitoring visits and achieved an average 
compliance rate of 96% (2014: 96%).

Site Manager Jak 
Harper providing 
feedback on a matter 
identified on site as 
part of our Five Steps 
to Safety initiative.

a Our strategy

We are committed to achieving the 
highest industry health and safety 
standards. Health and safety is a key 
principle for which all of our people 
are responsible.  
a KPI

 > Health and safety compliance rate  

96% (2014: 96%)1

 > Reportable injury incidence rate 
per 100,000 employees including 
subcontractors 381 (2014: 379)

1   Key performance indicator used to assess performance for 

annual incentive scheme.

Health and safety compliance rate %

96

97

96

96

2012

2013

2014

2015

Reportable injury incident rate per 100,000
employees (including subcontractors)

539

511

379

381

329

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

a Key highlights

 > Achieved target health and safety 

compliance rate

 > Achieved five star status in British 

Safety Council Occupational Health  
and Safety Audit

 > Received seven commended and one 
highly commended NHBC Health and 
Safety Awards and a special award for 
our ‘Five Steps to Safety’ initiative

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015 
 
35

Being a trusted partner

a Our strategy

We build meaningful, long term 
relationships that make us the developer 
of choice for our partners. We are 
innovating with our supply chain to drive 
efficiency and meet our customers’ needs.
a KPI

Percentage of land plots approved for 
purchase from public sector sources

30%

(2014: 18%)

a Key highlights

 > Continue to work with a variety 

of partners to bring forward land 
for development

 > Proven track record of delivery of 
challenging public sector sites

 > Continue to invest in the relationship 

with our suppliers and subcontractors

The challenge and our response
Housebuilding is a long term business 
and the development of sustained 
business partnerships with landowners, 
suppliers and subcontractors, is critical 
to our success. 

We continue to work with private 
landowners, operators and agents 
to identify and bring forward land for 
development. Divisional land teams 
continue to work hard to try and ensure 
we are regarded as the housebuilder 
of choice by the local landowning and 
agency community. 

We also form long term partnerships 
with the public sector and work to unlock 
challenging sites by finding solutions, 
sharing best practice and transferring 
knowledge. We have worked extensively 
with the Homes & Communities Agency 
(‘HCA’) and Greater London Authority 
(‘GLA’) to deliver new housing. In the 
period 2011-2015, we approved purchases 
of 22 sites from the HCA and GLA, which 
will accommodate c. 3,800 homes with a 
development value of c. £1.0bn.  

We have also acquired sites from many 
other Government departments, local 
authorities and NHS bodies. This year, 
3,950, 25% (2014: 3,928, 28%) of our 
housing completions were developed 
on public land. We have 5,113 plots 
(2014: 3,913) approved for purchase, 
representing a development value of  
c. £1.3bn (2014: c. £1.0bn). 

Our suppliers and subcontractors 
are critical to the delivery of our 
strategic objectives and we invest in 
our relationships with them. We hold 
a national supply chain conference 
and regular review meetings with our 
suppliers and seek to develop long term 
business relationships. We also work with 
our suppliers to help them to introduce 
the new technologies that we need to 
meet increasingly challenging building 
standards, and with our subcontractors to 
help them to improve their environmental 
and safety performance.

Neil Clarke, leader of Rushcliffe 
Borough Council starts the 
build process at Hollygate Park 
on the site of Cotgrave’s former 
colliery. He is pictured with 
John Reddington, Managing 
Director of David Wilson Homes 
East Midlands, Stephen Ward, 
Land Director, and John Dillon, 
Managing Director of Barratt 
Homes North Midlands.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements36

Strategic Report – Our principles continued
Building strong community relationships

a Our strategy

We engage fully with local communities 
and customers when creating new 
developments. We seek to ensure that 
our work creates a positive legacy that 
helps local communities to thrive.
a KPI

Percentage of active developments 
that have held a public consultation

54%

(2014: 46%)

a Key highlights

 > Estimated that our activities support 

around 53,000 jobs directly, indirectly or 
induced in the economy

 > Work closely with local authorities

 > Actively engage with local communities

The challenge and our response
Housebuilding has a direct impact 
upon local communities. It is therefore 
important that they are engaged in 
the creation process and that our 
development creates a positive legacy.

As a Group we contribute social and 
economic benefits to the communities 
in which we are working, which are far 
reaching and long lasting. By building 
more homes we are generating 
substantial amounts of economic activity 
and we estimate that during the year 
we supported around 53,000 jobs either 
directly, indirectly or induced. 

We work closely with local planning 
authorities to negotiate and deliver 
or fund social infrastructure such 
as highways and public transport 
improvements, new schools and 
school places, sports facilities and 
medical centres. 

Engagement with local communities 
to seek to address any impact that 
our developments may have on 
the environment is also important. 
By holding public consultations, 
we invite stakeholders to talk to our 
specialist planners and architects 
about their concerns and aspirations 
for our developments. We believe that 
a genuinely collaborative approach will 
deliver more land and housing. 54% 
(2014: 46%) of our active developments 
have held a public consultation.

Community engagement 
activities at our Newbury 
Racecourse site.

Our research shows that homeowners 
in new build developments are more 
likely to socialise with their neighbours. 
We therefore support a range of local 
initiatives, community websites and 
resident days to strengthen these links 
on our developments and help members 
of new communities to get to know 
each other. 

We continue to support and promote 
a wide range of charitable giving and 
community volunteering initiatives with 
each division focusing on the charitable 
activities that best reflect the needs of 
their local community and the issues 
that impact upon their employees. 
Our graduates actively engage with 
communities across the UK through 
the Prince’s Trust and for the second 
consecutive year they have won the 
Million Makers award for innovation and 
entrepreneurship with their initiative to 
produce a ‘Building Careers Workshop’. 

School children from  
St James’ C of E Primary 
School visited the Ribble 
Meadow development 
in Clitheroe, where they 
were given a tour by 
Barry Barratt.

Bee friendly planting at the award 
winning Trumpington Meadows 
development in Cambridge with  
Gary Nott, Site Manager and children 
from Fawcett Primary School.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201537

Safeguarding the environment

The challenges and our responses
Increasing the energy efficiency of the 
homes we build
We are committed to delivering 
energy efficient homes that are both 
economically and environmentally 
sustainable, providing real benefits 
to our customers and the community. 
During the year, we have continued to 
develop the sustainability features of our 
homes and developments. Our strategy 
for delivery remains ‘Fabric First, Fit 
and Forget’, minimising the need for 
complicated renewable technologies and 
helping our customers experience the 
benefits of energy and water efficiency 
with minimal complexities. 

Minimising our environmental impact
We seek to minimise the environmental 
impact of our operations by using 
resources efficiently and reducing 
waste and carbon in our construction 
processes. This year we have focused 
upon the waste and energy performance 
of our divisions with divisional 
sustainability action plans being created. 

We segregate waste for recycling as 
standard across our sites and have 
achieved a recycling rate of  
95% (2014: 94%) for the year. We remain 
focused on the quantity of waste 
generated, which disappointingly has 
increased to 6.63 tonnes (2014: 6.39 
tonnes) per legal completion this year. 
We have also developed a cross discipline 
Waste Reduction Plan to seek to reduce 
waste and are reviewing our waste policy. 

Our direct and indirect operational 
greenhouse gas emissions are shown 
in the table below. This is based on the 
energy used in our offices, on our live 
developments and for business travel.

Greenhouse gas emissions 
(Tonnes CO2e)

Year ended  
30 June 2015

Year ended  
30 June 2014

Scope 1 emissions

Scope 2 emissions

Scope 3 emissions

Total

Tonnes of emissions  
per 1,000 sq. ft. 

18,224

11,843

9,150

39,217

17,315

14,053

8,981

40,349

2.36

2.78

Our operational greenhouse gas emissions 
per 1,000 sq. ft. have reduced to 2.36 
(2014: 2.78) tonnes of emissions per 1,000 
sq. ft. this year. We continue to drive 
awareness and seek to improve energy 
and greenhouse gas performance across 
our business.

Enhancing habitats, biodiversity 
and local environments across our 
developments
During the year we built 57% (2014: 63%) of 
our homes on brownfield sites. 

We have recruited a biodiversity adviser 
as part of our national partnership 
with the RSPB, the UK’s largest nature 
conservation charity. We have revised our 
internal landscape design guidance and 
our ‘Great Places’ guide for our operating 
divisions with ecology and biodiversity 
at its core, to help ensure that they are 
considered from project inception through 
to completion. During the year within our 
developments, 634 (2014: 611) hectares 
of open space were created and 554,819 
(2014: 866,819) trees or shrubs were 
planted or retained.

Landscaped open 
space at White 
Sands, Camber, 
on the East 
Sussex coast.

a Our strategy

We strive to minimise the environmental 
impact of our operations and supply 
chain, which increases the energy 
and resource efficiency of our homes. 
We seek to enhance habitats, biodiversity 
and local environments across all of 
our developments.
a KPI

 > Construction waste segregated on site 

for recycling 95% (2014: 94%)

 > Total waste generation per legal 

completion 6.63 tonnes (2014: 6.39 tonnes)

Construction waste segregated onsite
for recycling

95

96

95

94

95

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Total waste generated per legal
completion tonnes

6.36

6.47

6.39

6.25

6.63

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

a Key highlights

 > Committed to developing the sustainability 
features of our homes through a ‘Fabric 
First, Fit and Forget’ strategy

 > Focused on waste reduction and energy 
performance improvements in the year

 > Recruited a biodiversity adviser as 

part of our national partnership with 
the RSPB

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements 
 
38

Strategic Report – Our principles continued
Ensuring the financial health of our business

a Our strategy

Our people take individual responsibility 
for driving the financial management 
and performance of the business. 
We maintain financial discipline across  
all aspects of our operations. 
a KPI

 > Profit before tax £565.5m 

(2014: £390.6m)1

 > Earnings per share 45.5 pence  

(2014: 31.2 pence)2

 > Return on capital employed 23.9% 

(2014: 19.5%)2

 > Total shareholder return2 for the three 

years ended 30 June 2015 362.9% (three 
years ended 30 June 2014: 239.3%)

 > Year end net cash £186.5m 

(2014: £73.1m)

 > Land creditors as a percentage of 
owned land bank 35% (2014: 33%)

1   Key performance indicator used to assess performance for 

annual incentive scheme.

2   Key performance indicator used to assess performance for 

long term incentive schemes.

a Key highlights

 > Continued to build profitability, 

increasing gross margin by 220 basis 
points to 19.0%

 > Achieved a 440 basis points increase in 

ROCE to 23.9%

 > On track for our FY17 targets of at least 
a 20% gross margin and at least a 25% 
ROCE

 > Maintained an appropriate 

capital structure 

Our performance
We aim to deliver sustainable shareholder 
value through the implementation of 
our priorities and the delivery of our key 
financial objectives of building the Group’s 
profitability, driving return on capital 
employed and maintaining an appropriate 
capital structure. We have made 
significant progress on these objectives 
during the year, achieving a 220 basis 
points increase in gross margin,  
a 44.8% increase in profit before tax  
and a 440 basis points improvement  
in ROCE to 23.9%. 

Profit for the year
The improved performance in both 
our housebuilding and commercial 
developments businesses resulted 
in an operating profit of £576.8m 
(2014: £409.8m) at an operating margin 
of 15.3% (2014: 13.0%).

The finance charge for the year was 
£57.0m (2014: £59.7m), consisting 
of a cash finance charge of £27.4m 
(2014: £26.7m) and £29.6m (2014: £33.0m) 
of non-cash charges.

Profit before tax for the year was £565.5m 
(2014: £390.6m), the highest profit the 
Group has ever achieved. The increase 
of £174.9m was driven by increased 
completion volumes, a greater proportion 
of completions from more recently 
acquired land and some underlying house 
price inflation.

The tax charge for the year was £115.2m 
(2014: £85.2m). The rate of tax assessed 
for the year is slightly below the standard 
effective rate of corporation tax at 20.75% 
(2014: 22.5%). 

Profit after tax for the year was £450.3m 
(2014: £305.4m), and a basic earnings per 
share of 45.5p (2014: 31.2p). 

Return on capital employed
The Group’s fast asset turn model of a 
shorter consented land bank, deferred 
payment terms, standardised product, 
and the ability to sell through both our 
national brands on larger sites is focused 
on driving ROCE.

For FY15 ROCE increased by 440 basis 
points to 23.9% (2014: 19.5%), and we 
are confident of delivering further good 
progress on ROCE, and achieving our 
FY17 target of at least 25% ROCE, as we 
continue the transformation of the land 
bank, and run down the Group’s low or 
zero margin legacy assets.

Fairmilehead, on 
the outskirts of 
Edinburgh offers 
2 bedroom flats and 
3 and 4 bedroom 
homes close to the 
Pentland Hills.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201539

Castlewell, Ellon, 
Aberdeenshire, award 
winning houses and 
flats designed in the 
local style. 

Total shareholder return for the 
three years ended 30 June 2015

362.9%

(2014: 239.3%)

Earnings per share

45.5p

(2014: 31.2p)

Net cash and capital structure
We maintain an appropriate capital 
structure, with land and long term work 
in progress funded by shareholders’ 
funds and land creditors, and minimal 
net cash at our year end. During the year 
we generated £184.0m (2014: £242.3m) 
of cash from our operations resulting 
in net cash at 30 June 2015 of £186.5m 
(2014: £73.1m). At 30 June 2015 land 
creditors were 35% (2014: 33%) of the 
owned land bank.

On 17 December 2014 the Group amended 
its financing agreements relating to the 
£700m revolving credit facility (‘RCF’), 
£100m term loan and $80m (£48m) 
private placement notes. This resulted 
in slightly improved commercial terms 
than in the original agreements. The RCF 
now extends to 17 December 2019 
(previously 14 May 2018) and the step 
down in the facility from £700m to £550m 
is now extended to 29 December 2017 
(previously 30 June 2016). Our covenant 
package is appropriate and our facilities 
provide appropriate headroom above our 
current forecast requirements.

As we make scheduled payments 
on agreed new land and build work 
in progress to deliver spring 2016 
completions, we expect net debt at 
31 December 2015 to be in line with 
normal seasonal trends (December 
2014: £134.2m). It remains our objective 
for FY16 to maintain an appropriate 
capital structure with minimal year end 
net cash and land creditors at around a 
third of the owned land bank. 

Capital Return Plan
The Board proposes to pay a final ordinary 
dividend of 10.3 pence (2014: 7.1 pence) 
per share for the financial year ended 
30 June 2015, which subject to shareholder 
approval, will be paid on 20 November 
2015 to shareholders on the register at 
the close of business on 30 October 2015. 
Together with the interim ordinary dividend 
of 4.8 pence per share, which was paid in 
the year, this gives a total ordinary dividend 
for the year of 15.1 pence per share 
(2014: 10.3 pence per share). The ordinary 
dividend was covered around three times 
by basic earnings per share. 

Under the special cash payment 
programme the Board is proposing a 
payment of £100m (10.0 pence per share), 
which subject to shareholder approval, will 
be paid by way of a special cash payment 
on 20 November 2015 to shareholders on 
the register at the close of business on 
30 October 2015. The Board anticipates 
further payments of £125m proposed with 
our FY16 results payable in November 
2016, and £175m proposed with our FY17 
results payable in November 2017. 

In combination, the Capital Return Plan 
is expected to return around £987m of 
cash through ordinary dividends (based 
on consensus earnings) and special cash 
payments to the Company’s shareholders 
over the three years ending November 2017.

Poppy Fields, a 
development of 4 and 5 
bedroom David Wilson 
Homes in the village of 
Charing near Ashford.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements40

Strategic Report
Risk management

Effective risk management is 
critical to the achievement of 
our strategic objectives. Risk 
management controls are 
integrated into all levels of our 
business and across all of our 
operations. We continually 
assess our exposure to risk 
and seek to ensure that risks 
are appropriately mitigated.

1. Board

Board

Audit Committee

 > Reviewing the effectiveness of internal controls, including systems to identify, 

 > Review key areas of accounting judgement

Nomination Committee

Remuneration Committee

 > Ensuring an appropriate balance of skills, knowledge and experience  

 > Review the composition of the Board and manage succession planning

on the Board

and Senior Management

 > Ensuring the appropriate incentivisation of the Executive Directors  

 > Review the remuneration of the senior executives and the appropriateness of 

incentive schemes

2. Group management

Executive Committee

 > Monitoring performance and changes in key risks facing the business and 

 > Implement strategic direction of the Group

Safety, Health and Environmental Committee

 > Ensuring the stewardship of safety, health and environmental performance

 > Review Group performance and initiatives to enhance our safety record   

Roles and responsibilities
The Board is responsible for the overall stewardship of our 
system of risk management and internal control. It has 
established the level of risk that is appropriate for our business 
and acceptable in the pursuit of our strategic objectives and 
has set appropriate policies. It has also set delegated authority 
levels to provide the framework for assessing risks and 
ensuring that they are escalated to the appropriate levels of 
management, including up to the Board where appropriate, 
for consideration and approval.

The roles and responsibilities of the Board, its committees  
and all levels of management from a risk management 
perspective are summarised as follows:

3. Regional  
management

4. Divisional  
management

Operations Committee

Health and Safety Operating Committee

 > Reviewing regional operating performance

 > Review of regional performance, risks and mitigation plans

 > Reviewing the effectiveness of health and safety policies and establishing 

 > Implement health and safety policies and procedures approved by the Board

Risk Committee

Treasury Operating Committee

Land Committee

Regional management

Divisional management

 > Business planning to support strategic objectives

 > Monthly board meetings and regular site reviews to review performance, risks 

 > Maintaining an effective system of risk management and internal control within 

Responsibilities

 > Strategic leadership

Actions undertaken

 > Set the strategic direction for the Group

 > Determining the level of risk acceptable, assessing key risks and seeking to 

 > Issue and review risk management policy

ensure that they are appropriately managed and mitigated

 > Annually review effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems

 > Setting delegated authority levels

 > Approving policies and procedures

assess and monitor risks

 > Review key risks and responses

 > Individual and collective site visits

 > Receive regular reports on internal and external audit

 > Biannually assess risk management and internal control systems

provides regular reports to the Board

 > Three year plan process incorporating annual budgeting

 > Responsible for ensuring that the risk management policy is implemented and 

embedded within the business and appropriate actions are taken to manage risks 

 > Regular performance reviews

 > Biannual review of internal assessment of risk management and control  

self-certification

 > Review results of assurance activities

controls and procedures to manage these risks

 > Review results of assurance activities and safety first initiatives 

 > Consideration of identified risks and their mitigation

 > Review Group and operational risk action plans

 > Management of liquidity and counterparty risk and ensuring that treasury policies 

 > Implement treasury policies and procedures approved by the Board

are implemented and embedded within the business

 > Reviewing and authorising all proposed land acquisitions to manage land 

 > Review of land acquisition proposals and post-investment appraisals

 > Responsible for risk identification, management and control within their region   

 > Review divisional performance including regular site visits with review and 

 > Ensuring that divisional risk management responsibilities are appropriately 

assessment of performance, risks and their mitigation

 > Biannual review of divisional risk management and control self-certification

and their mitigation

 > Quarterly site valuation and valuation reviews

 > Biannual risk management, control self-certification and risk escalation

acquisition risk

discharged

their division

 > Maintaining an effective system of risk management and internal control upon 

 > Day-to-day management of their site

their site including construction risks, subcontractor risks and health and safety

 > Providing guidance and advice to operational management to help with 

 > Provide guidance, support and challenge for management including: regular 

risk identification, quantification and mitigation, including customer care, 

health and safety, legal and regulatory requirements, product design and 

customer satisfaction; financial, health and safety and operational performance 

reviews; environmental and climate change updates; the review and authorisation 

technical specifications, human resources, commercial, IT, land and planning, 

of product design/technical specifications; and training, guidance and policies

procurement, finance, insurance, environmental and sustainability

 > Centrally maintained IT systems

 > Centralised procurement for key material supplies

 > Develop and implement approved strategy for insurable risk

 > Independent review of the effectiveness of risk management and compliance with 

 > Regular operational, financial and commercial audits

 > Reporting to the Audit Committee upon the effectiveness of key controls

without management present

 > Reporting to the Audit Committee on whistleblowing

 > Review of biannual risk management and control self-certification

 > Regular reports to the Audit Committee and meetings with the Audit Committee 

internal controls

within divisional offices

 > Regular reports to Health and Safety Committee, Board, Executive and 

Operations Committees

 > Attend divisional Board meetings

1
Board

2
Group
management

3
Regional management 

P

o

l

i

c

y

a

n

d

r

e

v

i

e

w

4
Divisional management 

5
Site management

5. Site management

Site management

Group support  
functions

Support functions

Internal audit  
and assurance

Internal audit

Health and safety

 > Independent audit of health and safety procedures and controls on sites and 

 > Regular site audits

Group architects

 > Ensuring all properties are designed in accordance with relevant legislation 

 > Regular site audits

(including carbon reduction and climate change) and best practice design

 > Approval process for non-standard properties

Overall
stewardship

Assurance
lines of
defence

First line:
Operational
management

ort
p
p
p su
e: Gro
d lin
e: Intern
n
eco
S
hird lin

ortin
s
s
d a
k re
n
dit a
d ris
u
n
al a
n a
atio
Inform

e 
c
n
ura

T

u

p

g

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015 
 
41

1. Board

Board

Responsibilities

 > Strategic leadership

Actions undertaken

 > Set the strategic direction for the Group

 > Determining the level of risk acceptable, assessing key risks and seeking to 

 > Issue and review risk management policy

ensure that they are appropriately managed and mitigated

 > Setting delegated authority levels

 > Approving policies and procedures

 > Annually review effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems

 > Review key risks and responses

 > Individual and collective site visits

Audit Committee

 > Reviewing the effectiveness of internal controls, including systems to identify, 

 > Review key areas of accounting judgement

assess and monitor risks

 > Receive regular reports on internal and external audit

 > Biannually assess risk management and internal control systems

Nomination Committee

Remuneration Committee

 > Ensuring an appropriate balance of skills, knowledge and experience  

 > Review the composition of the Board and manage succession planning

on the Board

 > Ensuring the appropriate incentivisation of the Executive Directors  

 > Review the remuneration of the senior executives and the appropriateness of 

and Senior Management

incentive schemes

Safety, Health and Environmental Committee

 > Ensuring the stewardship of safety, health and environmental performance

 > Review Group performance and initiatives to enhance our safety record   

 > Monitoring performance and changes in key risks facing the business and 

 > Implement strategic direction of the Group

provides regular reports to the Board

 > Three year plan process incorporating annual budgeting

 > Responsible for ensuring that the risk management policy is implemented and 

embedded within the business and appropriate actions are taken to manage risks 

 > Regular performance reviews

 > Biannual review of internal assessment of risk management and control  

self-certification

 > Review results of assurance activities

Operations Committee

Health and Safety Operating Committee

 > Reviewing regional operating performance

 > Review of regional performance, risks and mitigation plans

 > Reviewing the effectiveness of health and safety policies and establishing 

 > Implement health and safety policies and procedures approved by the Board

controls and procedures to manage these risks

 > Review results of assurance activities and safety first initiatives 

 > Consideration of identified risks and their mitigation

 > Review Group and operational risk action plans

 > Management of liquidity and counterparty risk and ensuring that treasury policies 

 > Implement treasury policies and procedures approved by the Board

are implemented and embedded within the business

 > Reviewing and authorising all proposed land acquisitions to manage land 

 > Review of land acquisition proposals and post-investment appraisals

acquisition risk

 > Responsible for risk identification, management and control within their region   

 > Review divisional performance including regular site visits with review and 

 > Ensuring that divisional risk management responsibilities are appropriately 

assessment of performance, risks and their mitigation

discharged

 > Biannual review of divisional risk management and control self-certification

Divisional management

 > Business planning to support strategic objectives

 > Monthly board meetings and regular site reviews to review performance, risks 

 > Maintaining an effective system of risk management and internal control within 

their division

and their mitigation

 > Quarterly site valuation and valuation reviews

 > Biannual risk management, control self-certification and risk escalation

5. Site management

Site management

 > Maintaining an effective system of risk management and internal control upon 

 > Day-to-day management of their site

their site including construction risks, subcontractor risks and health and safety

Support functions

 > Providing guidance and advice to operational management to help with 

 > Provide guidance, support and challenge for management including: regular 

risk identification, quantification and mitigation, including customer care, 
health and safety, legal and regulatory requirements, product design and 
technical specifications, human resources, commercial, IT, land and planning, 
procurement, finance, insurance, environmental and sustainability

customer satisfaction; financial, health and safety and operational performance 
reviews; environmental and climate change updates; the review and authorisation 
of product design/technical specifications; and training, guidance and policies

 > Centrally maintained IT systems

 > Centralised procurement for key material supplies

 > Develop and implement approved strategy for insurable risk

 > Independent review of the effectiveness of risk management and compliance with 

 > Regular operational, financial and commercial audits

internal controls

 > Regular reports to the Audit Committee and meetings with the Audit Committee 

 > Reporting to the Audit Committee upon the effectiveness of key controls

without management present

 > Reporting to the Audit Committee on whistleblowing

 > Review of biannual risk management and control self-certification

Health and safety

 > Independent audit of health and safety procedures and controls on sites and 

 > Regular site audits

within divisional offices

 > Regular reports to Health and Safety Committee, Board, Executive and 

Group architects

 > Ensuring all properties are designed in accordance with relevant legislation 
(including carbon reduction and climate change) and best practice design

Operations Committees

 > Attend divisional Board meetings

 > Regular site audits

 > Approval process for non-standard properties

2. Group management

Executive Committee

Risk Committee

Treasury Operating Committee

Land Committee

Regional management

3. Regional  

management

4. Divisional  

management

Group support  

functions

Internal audit  

and assurance

Internal audit

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements42

Strategic Report – Risk management continued
Principal risks and uncertainties
Our performance is subject to a number of risks, of which the principal 
risks and the changes impacting on them are set out in the table below. 
The Board has conducted a robust assessment of the principal risks facing 
the business. No new principal risks have emerged during the financial year.

Risk and description

Relevance to strategy

Mitigation

Changes in factors impacting  
on the risk in 2015

Economic environment, including 
housing demand and mortgage 
availability

Changes in the UK and European 
macroeconomic environments, 
including unemployment, flat or 
negative economic growth, buyer 
confidence, availability of mortgage 
finance particularly for higher loan to 
values including Government backed 
schemes, the ability of purchasers 
to repay equity share loans, interest 
rates, competitor pricing, falls in house 
prices or land values, may lead to a 
fall in the demand for houses, which 
in turn could result in impairments of 
the Group’s inventories, goodwill and 
intangible assets.

The majority of homes built by the 
Group are purchased by individuals 
who rely on the availability of 
mortgages. The confidence of buyers 
and their ability to obtain mortgages or 
other forms of financing are impacted 
by the macroeconomic environment. 
Accordingly, customer demand is 
sensitive to changes in economic 
conditions.

The Group’s ability to grow its business 
partly depends on securing land or 
options over sites and having adequate 
resources to build sufficient homes to 
meet demand. The Group’s ability to do 
this can be impacted by cash and profit 
constraints which, in turn, would have 
an adverse effect upon net operating 
assets and net debt (see also the 
liquidity, land and construction risks 
sections below).

 > Executive Committee, regional and 
divisional weekly reviews of trading 
performance and key performance 
indicators

The UK economy continued to grow 
in the 12 months to 30 June 2015, with 
most economic indicators showing 
improvements on the prior year.

 > Monthly Board report on trading 
performance and the economic 
environment, including mortgage 
affordability statistics

 > Internal systems identify the impact of 

sales price changes on margins

 > Quarterly site valuations and reviews

 > Half yearly net realisable reviews 
of inventories and annual asset 
impairment reviews for goodwill and 
intangible assets

 > Comprehensive sales policies and 
procedures including transparency 
towards mortgage lenders

 > Head of Mortgage Lender Relations 
works with key mortgage lenders 
to seek to ensure that appropriate 
products are available for customers 

Average quoted household interest 
rates remain at affordable levels and 
mortgage transaction volumes have 
remained broadly constant over the 
last year. 

Government support for the UK 
housebuilding industry has remained 
strong. The Government has extended 
Help to Buy (Equity Loan) in England 
until 2020. We expect Help to Buy in 
England to remain a very attractive 
opportunity for our customers, 
particularly first time buyers. Help to 
Buy in Scotland has ended and Wales 
ends 2016.

      See pages 10 and 11

Land purchasing 

The ability to secure sufficient 
consented land and strategic land 
options at appropriate cost and quality 
to provide profitable growth.

The Group needs to purchase  
sufficient quantities of good quality, 
consented land at attractive prices in 
order to be in a position to achieve its 
annual construction forecasts and 
enhance the Group’s ability to deliver 
profit growth.

Acquiring poor quality or mispriced 
land would have an adverse impact on 
profitability and revenue.

 > All potential land acquisitions are 

subject to formal appraisal, approval 
by the Group’s Land Committee and 
must meet minimum hurdle rates of 
20% gross margin and 25% site ROCE

 > Divisional, regional and Group 

monthly analysis of land currently 
owned, committed and identified 
against requirements

 > Regular divisional land meetings

The Group continues to see a good 
range of opportunities for current 
and strategic land for investment in 
its targeted locations. This is without 
undue concentration and without 
relaxing the Group’s site hurdle rates of 
20% gross margin and 25% site ROCE. 
However, there remains a strong 
demand for conventional and low 
complexity sites particularly in London 
and the South East.

Liquidity

Unavailability of sufficient borrowing 
facilities to enable the servicing of 
liabilities (including pension funding) 
and the inability to refinance facilities 
as they fall due, obtain surety bonds, 
or comply with borrowing covenants. 
Furthermore, there are risks to 
management of working capital such 
as conditional contracts, build costs, 
joint ventures and the cash flows 
related to them.

The Group maintains committed 
facilities of different duration that are 
designed to ensure that the Group 
has sufficient available funds for 
operations. The Group’s borrowings 
are cyclical during the financial year 
and peak around April/May and 
October/November each year. Due to 
our seasonal trends in income, these 
are the calendar points when the 
Group has the highest working capital 
requirements.

The Group maintains sufficient 
committed debt facility headroom 
and in addition has a number of trade 
finance and surety facilities that 
are designed to ensure the Group 
has sufficient funds available. The 
absence of appropriate headroom 
would limit the Group’s land buying 
and operational capability, adversely 
affecting profitability and the Group’s 
ability to deliver shareholder value.

 > Committed bank facilities and private 
placement notes of around £850m 
with maturities ranging from 2016 
to 2021

 > Regular forecasts including working 
capital, cash flow facility headroom, 
surety bond requirements and 
compliance with banking covenants

 > Group policies require maintaining 
facility headroom of up to £150m

      See pages 22 to 25

The Group is in compliance with its 
borrowing covenants and, at the date 
of approval of the 2015 Annual Report 
and Accounts, the Group’s internal 
forecasts indicate that it will remain in 
compliance with these covenants for 
the foreseeable future, being at least 
12 months from the date of approval.

During the year the Group amended its 
financing arrangements relating to its 
£700m revolving credit facility, £100m 
term loan and c. £50m of US private 
placements notes. This has resulted in 
slightly improved commercial terms. 

     See pages 39 and 112

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201543

Change in the risk in FY15:

Increased

Decreased

Same

Risk and description

Attracting and retaining  
high-calibre employees *

Inability to recruit and/or retain 
employees with appropriate skill 
sets or sufficient numbers of such 
employees.

Relevance to strategy

Mitigation

The Group aims to attract, retain 
and develop a sufficiently skilled and 
experienced workforce in order to 
maintain high standards of quality and 
customer service.

Not having employees with appropriate 
skill sets can lead to build delays, 
quality issues, reduced sales, 
poor customer care and reduced 
profitability.

 > Comprehensive Human Resources 

programme led by the Group Human 
Resources Director including 
apprenticeship schemes, a graduate 
development programme, succession 
planning and training academies 
tailored to each discipline

 > Monthly monitoring of employee 
statistics including turnover and 
absence

 > Exit interviews

 > Annual employee engagement survey 

 > Remuneration benchmarked against 

industry competitors

Changes in factors impacting  
on the risk in 2015

There continues to be high competition 
amongst employers in some regions, 
which has resulted in employee 
turnover increasing to 19% (2014: 
16%). We have continued to invest in 
the training and development of our 
workforce in order to assist in both 
retention and succession planning. 

To help the Group address the skill 
shortage in the building industry, 
we have recruited 792 apprentices, 
graduates and trainees from FY14 to 
FY16.

In addition, we have introduced a 
strategy to assist in addressing 
diversity across the Group. 

      See pages 30 to 33

Availability of raw materials, 
subcontractors and suppliers *

Shortages or increased costs of 
materials and skilled labour, the 
failure of a key supplier or the inability 
to secure supplies upon appropriate 
credit terms could increase costs and 
delay construction.

The Group relies upon affordable 
supplies of building materials from 
multiple sources and subcontractors to 
perform the majority of work on sites. 
This retains flexibility to commence 
work on new sites and enhances the 
Group’s build cost efficiency. Adverse 
management of these suppliers and/
or subcontractors could lead to build 
delays, cost increases and reduced 
profitability.

 > Centralised team led by the Group 

Procurement Director procures the 
majority of the Group’s materials from 
within the UK including subcontractor 
materials, ensuring consistent quality 
and costs and security of supply

 > All of our significant supply 

agreements are fixed in advance, 
usually for 12 months

 > Seek to establish and maintain long 
term supplier and subcontractor 
partnerships

 > Group policies include tendering, the 

requirement for multiple suppliers for 
both labour contracts and material 
supplies and establish contingency 
plans should any key supplier fail

 > Professional approach to site 

management

During the year we saw overall build 
cost inflation of c. 3.5%. We have a 
robust and carefully managed supply 
chain with 85% of our build materials 
sourced through our centralised 
procurement function. We have seen 
an increase in the supply of skilled 
subcontractors over the past year, 
however there remains an industry 
shortage, with increases in labour 
costs remaining the largest driver of 
overall build cost inflation.

We continue to renew our 
subcontractor and supplier 
agreements to ensure best pricing  
and the continuous availability of  
labour and materials.

      See page 14

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements44

Strategic Report – Risk management continued

Risk and description

Relevance to strategy

Mitigation

The Group’s land portfolio consists of 
land for the short and medium term as 
well as strategic land. Inability to obtain 
suitable consents, or unforeseen 
delays, could impact on the number 
or type of homes that we are able to 
build. We could also be required to 
fund higher than anticipated levels 
of planning obligations, or incur 
additional costs to meet increased 
regulatory requirements. All of these 
would have a detrimental impact on 
the contribution per plot. The Group 
seeks to meet regulatory and planning 
requirements to obtain the planning 
permission required to develop homes 
and communities.

The Group builds homes and 
communities in Britain ranging 
from houses to large-scale flatted 
developments. In the event we did not 
do so efficiently, or new technologies 
result in quality issues, the Group’s 
profitability and ability to grow the 
business could be impacted negatively.

Government regulation and  
planning policy *

Inability to adhere to the increasingly 
stringent and complex regulatory 
environment, including planning and 
technical requirements affecting 
the housing market and regulatory 
requirements more generally.

Construction and new technologies *

Failure to identify and achieve key 
construction milestones, due to 
factors including the impact of adverse 
weather conditions, the failure to 
identify cost overruns promptly, design 
and construction defects, and exposure 
to environmental liabilities, which could 
delay construction, increase costs, 
reduce selling prices and result in 
litigation and uninsured losses. There 
are also risks associated with climate 
change and the use of new technology 
in the build process e.g. materials 
related to carbon reduction.

 > Consultation with the Government 
both directly and through industry 
bodies to highlight potential issues

 > Considerable in-house technical 
and planning expertise devoted to 
complying with regulations and 
achieving implementable planning 
consents

 > Rigorous design standards for the 

homes and places we develop

Changes in factors impacting  
on the risk in 2015

Following the implementation of the 
Government’s National Planning Policy 
Framework, we welcome the further 
measures put in place to ensure local 
authorities have a five-year land supply. 
This is leading to an improved dialogue 
between local authorities and our 
divisions. Nevertheless, the planning 
process remains a lengthy one and 
affects the speed at which housing 
supply can increase. 

 > Policies and technical guidance 

manuals for employees on regulatory 
compliance and the standards of 
business conduct expected

      See page 25

The Group is continuing an assessment 
of various modern methods of offsite 
construction and considering their 
suitability for utilisation within the 
business to reduce the risks inherent in 
the construction process.

      See pages 26 to 29

 > Executive Committee, regional and 
divisional weekly reviews of trading 
performance and key performance 
indicators

 > Progress with development projects 

(including joint ventures and 
consortia) is monitored regularly 
by divisional management teams, 
including through monthly board 
meetings and regular site visits

 > Any alternative forms of construction 
and building technologies and the 
quality of materials are subject to 
evaluation by external and internal 
technical experts, including the 
NHBC, to ensure compliance with all 
building and other regulations

 > Quarterly site valuations and  

valuation reviews

 > Monitoring of environmental impact 

indicators 

 > Maintenance of appropriate  

insurance cover

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201545

Change in the risk in FY15:

Increased

Decreased

Same

Risk and description

Relevance to strategy

Mitigation

Joint ventures and consortia

Large development projects, some 
of which involve joint ventures or 
consortia arrangements and/or 
commercial developments, are 
complex and capital intensive and 
changes may negatively impact upon 
cash flows or returns.

Due to their scale, some projects may 
require joint venture or consortium 
arrangements. Failure of a joint 
venture or consortium partner to 
perform its financial and/or operational 
obligations can place additional capital 
or operational burdens upon the Group.

 > All potential joint ventures are subject 
to formal appraisal and approval by 
the Group’s Land Committee and the 
Board

 > Once operational, the performance 

of joint ventures and consortia 
arrangements are subject to regular 
operational and financial review

Changes in factors impacting  
on the risk in 2015

During the year, the Group has entered 
into one new joint venture.

      See page 13

Safety, health and environmental *

Health and safety or environmental 
breaches can result in injuries to 
employees, subcontractors and site 
visitors, delays in construction or 
increased costs, reputational damage, 
criminal prosecution and civil litigation.

IT

Failure of the Group’s IT systems 
(whether due to cyber attacks or other 
causes) in particular those relating 
to surveying and valuation, could 
adversely impact the performance of 
the Group.

Health and safety is a key issue in 
the housebuilding sector. Given the 
inherent risks, it is of paramount 
importance to the Group. Senior 
management and the Board review 
health and safety matters on a regular 
basis and seek to reduce injury 
incidence rates by implementing 
policies and procedures aimed  
at keeping staff and visitors free  
from injury.

In addition to the possibly tragic impact 
of an accident on-site, there is potential 
for legal proceedings, financial 
penalties, reputational damage and 
delays to the site’s progress.

The ability to optimise prices and 
ensure operational efficiency is 
essential to the Group’s performance. 
The Group’s integrated management 
systems enable the Group to maintain 
tight control, especially with regard to 
surveying and valuation.

Adverse IT performance could cause 
delays in build and have an adverse 
impact on operational efficiency 
and profit.

 > Health and safety department, 

independent of the management of 
the operating divisions

 > Regular health and safety audits 

and development monitoring visits 
with reports produced for divisional, 
regional, Safety, Health and 
Environment Committee, Executive 
Committee and Board review

 > Group health and safety and 
environmental policies and 
procedures

During the year, the Group’s 
construction activity has continued 
at an increased level. The Group has 
invested in its health and safety team 
to retain the frequency of the audit 
and monitoring of developments. The 
Group has introduced an enhanced 
series of measures to draw awareness 
to site safety and to risks inherent in the 
construction process. 

The Group has also continued 
to develop its Safety, Health and 
Environmental systems and has 
established a Board Safety, Health and 
Environmental Committee.

      See page 34

 > Centrally maintained IT systems

 > Fully-tested disaster recovery 

programme

The Group has continued to invest in its 
site based IT for sales and construction 
teams, customer websites, business 
systems and IT infrastructure.

 > Regular exercises completed to seek 

to reduce the risk of penetration 
through cyber attacks

      See page 21

*  Sustainability risks are explored in more detail in our 2015 Sustainability Report, available at www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk 

Details of the Group’s management of liquidity risk, market risk, credit risk and capital risk in relation to financial instruments are 
provided in note 27 to the Financial Statements.

Details of the Group’s contingent liabilities are provided in note 34 to the Financial Statements.

The Strategic Report on pages 2 to 45 was approved by the Board and is signed on its behalf by:

David Thomas 
Chief Executive 

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements46

The Board 

John Allan
Non-Executive Chairman

David Thomas
Chief Executive/Group Finance Director

Steven Boyes
Chief Operating Officer

Appointment to the Board: 

Appointment to the Board: 

Appointment to the Board: 

John joined the Board as a Non-Executive Director 
on 1 August 2014 and became Chairman on 
12 November 2014.

David joined as an Executive Director and the Group 
Finance Director on 21 July 2009 and was appointed 
Chief Executive on 1 July 2015.

Committee membership: 

Committee membership: 

Chairman of the Nomination Committee and 
a member of the Remuneration Committee. 

Member of the Nomination Committee with effect 
from 1 July 2015.

Career and experience: 

Career and experience: 

John brings a broad range of business and retail 
experience to the Board. He became Chairman of 
Tesco PLC on 1 March 2015 and also of London First on 
1 January 2015. He is also a Non-Executive Director of 
Worldpay and a regent of the University of Edinburgh. 
Until recently, John was Deputy Chairman of Dixons 
Carphone PLC, a Non-Executive Director of Royal 
Mail PLC and Chairman of Dixons Retail plc (2009-
2014) when it merged with Carphone Warehouse 
Group plc to form Dixons Carphone plc. He was 
also Chief Executive and CFO of Deutsche Post 
until 2009, and of Exel plc, until 2005. He was also a 
Non-Executive Director of National Grid plc (2005-
2011), 3i plc (2009-2011) and of various other public 
companies in the UK, Germany and Denmark.

David brings a wealth of financial and leadership 
experience acquired over a number of years in 
senior positions. He is an Associate of the Institute of 
Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. He was 
formerly the Group Finance Director and the Deputy 
Chief Executive of The GAME Group plc (2004-2009). 
Before that he was the Group Finance Director at 
Millennium and Copthorne Hotels plc (1998-2004) and 
held senior financial roles with House of Fraser plc 
and Forte plc.

Steven joined the Board as an Executive Director on 
1 July 2001 and was appointed as the Group’s Chief 
Operating Officer on 5 July 2012 with responsibility 
for all of the Group’s housebuilding operations.

Committee membership:

Member of the Safety, Health and Environmental 
Committee. 

Career and experience: 

Steven has over 37 years’ experience in the 
housebuilding industry having joined Barratt in 1978 
as a junior quantity surveyor and progressing through 
the business to assume the roles of Technical 
Director and Managing Director of Barratt York 
before being appointed Regional Director for Barratt 
Northern in 1999.

Tessa Bamford
Non-Executive Director

Nina Bibby
Non-Executive Director

Appointment to the Board: 

Appointment to the Board: 

Tessa was appointed as a Non-Executive Director 
on 1 July 2009.

Nina joined the Board as a Non-Executive Director 
on 3 December 2012.

Committee membership: 

Committee membership: 

Member of the Audit, Nomination and Remuneration 
Committees. 

Member of the Audit, Nomination and Remuneration 
Committees. 

Career and experience: 

Career and experience: 

Tessa brings a broad business experience to the 
Board. She is currently a Non-Executive Director 
of Wolseley plc and a consultant at Spencer 
Stuart. Tessa was formerly a Director of Cantos 
Communications Limited (2001-2011) and a Director 
of J Henry Schroder & Co with whom her career 
spanned over 12 years in various roles (1986-1998).

Nina brings marketing experience to the Board 
and is currently the Marketing and Consumer 
Director at O2 UK, Telefonica. She was formerly the 
Global Chief Marketing Officer at Barclaycard, the 
payments subsidiary of Barclays plc until 30 May 
2013. Prior to Barclaycard, Nina was SVP Global 
Brand Management at InterContinental Hotels Group 
plc (2006-2009) and worked at Diageo (1997-2006), 
latterly as Commercial Strategy Director.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Governance47

Mark Rolfe
Senior Independent Director

Richard Akers
Non-Executive Director

Other Directors who served 
during FY15:

Mark Clare
Group Chief Executive until 30 June 2015

Appointment to the Board: 

Appointment to the Board: 

Mark was appointed as a Non-Executive Director 
on 1 May 2008 and became the Group’s Senior 
Independent Director on 14 November 2012.

Committee membership: 

Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member 
of the Nomination and Remuneration Committees.

Richard joined the Board as a Non-Executive Director 
on 2 April 2012.

Committee membership: 

Chairman of the Remuneration and the Safety, Health 
and Environmental Committees and a member of the 
Audit and Nomination Committees. 

Career and experience: 

Career and experience: 

Mark is an experienced Non-Executive Director 
with a strong financial and retail background. He is 
currently a Non-Executive Director of Debenhams plc 
and a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants 
in England and Wales. Mark was formerly a Non-
Executive Director of The Sage Group plc (2007-2013) 
and Hornby plc (2008-2014), Chairman of Lane Clark 
& Peacock LLP (2008-2014), and Finance Director 
of Gallaher Group Plc (2000-2007). His career with 
Gallaher spanned 20 years during which time he 
served in various finance and executive roles.

Richard has a broad range of property knowledge 
and experience. He is a Non-Executive Director of 
Emaar Malls Group PJSC, a member of the Advisory 
Board for Battersea Power Station Development 
Company and a Fellow of the Royal Institution of 
Chartered Surveyors. Richard was a senior executive 
of Land Securities Group plc (1995-2014), joining the 
main Board in May 2005 following his appointment 
as Managing Director of the Retail Portfolio. He was 
also a Director and President of the British Council 
of Shopping Centres (2009-2012), the main industry 
body for retail property owners.

Mark Clare joined the Board as Group Chief 
Executive on 2 October 2006. He stepped down from 
this position on 30 June 2015 and subsequently as 
Executive Director on 31 July 2015.

Bob Lawson
Non-Executive Chairman until 12 November 2014

Tom Keevil
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary

Bob Lawson joined the Board as a Non-Executive 
Director on 1 June 2008 and became Non-Executive 
Chairman on 1 July 2008. He stepped down as 
Chairman of the Company at the conclusion of the 
2014 AGM on 12 November 2014.

Appointment to the Board: 

Tom was appointed Group General Counsel and 
Company Secretary on 1 April 2011. 

Committee membership:

Member of the Safety, Health and Environmental 
Committee. 

Career and experience: 

Tom is a Non-Executive Director of FM Insurance 
Company Limited and a Fellow of the Chartered 
Institute of Arbitrators. He was previously the Group 
General Counsel and Company Secretary of United 
Utilities Group PLC (2007-2011) and Gallaher Group 
Plc (2001-2007). Prior to this, he was a partner at 
international law firm Simmons and Simmons, which 
he joined in 1984.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements48

Chairman’s introduction

John Allan
Chairman

“ The Board is focused on ensuring good 
governance is embedded in our culture in 
order to help promote the long term success 
of the Group.”

a  Key achievements of the Board 

a  Areas of focus for the Board  

during FY15

in FY16

 > Review the Group’s strategy and appetite for risk;
 > Determine key objectives for FY17 and agree to 

whom each of the objectives should be assigned 
for successful delivery;

 > Subject to shareholder approval at the 2015 AGM 

and beyond, continue with the Capital Return Plan;
 > To fully comply with the UK Corporate Governance 

Code issued September 2014;

 > Support David Thomas and Neil Cooper as they 

transition into their new roles;

 > Deliver the action plan arising from the FY15 

performance evaluation; and

 > Undertake an externally facilitated performance 

evaluation of the Board and its Committees.

Financial health
 > Led the Group to deliver a record profit before  

tax of £565.5m;

 > Agreed the payment of ordinary dividends totalling 

£117.7m; and

 > Recommending both a final ordinary dividend 
of 10.3 pence per share equating to £102.3m 
and the first special cash payment of £100m to 
shareholders under our Capital Return Plan.

Board succession
 > I received a full and tailored induction;
 > Effectively used succession planning to manage 
Mark Clare’s retirement and the promotion of 
David Thomas to the position of Chief Executive; and

 > Appointed Neil Cooper as Chief Financial 

Officer Designate.

Stewardship
 > Undertook individual health and safety site reviews 
with the Group Safety, Health and Environmental 
Director to promote our safety first culture; and

 > Visited sites and divisions individually and collectively, 

holding Board meetings at two regional locations.

Best practice
 > Reviewed the effectiveness of the internal control 
and principal risk assessment processes; and

 > Reviewed and updated our key policies, the schedule 
of matters reserved and terms of reference as well 
as those of the Board’s Committees.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Governance49

Risk management and internal controls
Given the risks inherent with building and construction, 
there is appropriate awareness of risk amongst Directors. 
Board members are fully cognisant of the individual and collective 
responsibility of the Board to: (i) determine the nature and extent 
of the risks the Board is willing to take to achieve the Company’s 
strategic corporate objectives; and (ii) to review the effectiveness 
of the risk management systems and internal controls (in 
conjunction with the Audit Committee). The commentary on 
the management of risk and the review of principal risks and 
uncertainties on pages 40 to 45 contains an analysis of how the 
risks affecting the Group have changed in the financial year. 
Given the focus on continuously improving our health and safety 
performance, we established a Safety, Health and Environmental 
Board Committee (the ‘SHE Committee’), chaired by Richard 
Akers, at the beginning of the 2015 financial year to assist the 
Board with discharging its responsibilities in this area moving 
forward. Details of the work they have undertaken in their first 
year are set out on pages 73 to 74.

Shareholder engagement
As a Board we remain focused on delivering long term value to 
our shareholders, whilst ensuring that we continue to promote 
sustainable developments and homes. Accordingly, we place 
continuing importance upon maintaining strong relationships with 
our shareholders and other key stakeholders. Full details on how 
we engage with our shareholders are provided on pages 60 to 61. 

Fair, balanced and understandable
Having established a robust process for determining if the 
2014 Annual Report and Accounts were ‘fair, balanced and 
understandable’, the same process was adopted to the 
assessment of the 2015 Annual Report and Accounts. The process 
is detailed on page 69 and the Board’s formal statement on the 
Annual Report and Accounts is contained within the Directors’ 
Responsibility Statement on page 102.

The following pages set out our governance structures, 
processes and the work undertaken by the Board and its 
Committees during FY15. 

John Allan 
Chairman

8 September 2015

I am pleased to present my first corporate governance report for 
the Company since taking over as Chairman in November 2014. 

During the 2014/15 financial year your Company fully complied 
with the main and supporting principles of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code (the ‘Code’), issued in September 2012 
(a copy of which is available from www.frc.org.uk). We describe 
how we have applied the main principles throughout pages 51 
to 95. It has also made good progress towards achieving full 
compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code issued in 
September 2014 which will apply for FY16. The Company has 
also complied with the requirements under the Disclosure 
and Transparency Rules, the Listing Rules and the BIS 
Directors’ Remuneration Reporting regulations and narrative 
reporting requirements. 

The Board recognises that good corporate governance requires 
more than just awareness and adherence to the Code. It is 
focused on seeking to ensure that good governance is embedded 
in our culture and that high standards of corporate governance 
apply across all areas of the business to support the long term 
success of the Group. The Board receives regular updates on 
changes in corporate governance requirements and strives to 
respond to such changes in advance of mandatory application  
as and when it is practicable to do so. 

Retirements from the Board
As reported last year, Bob Lawson stepped down from his 
position as Chairman after six years’ service on 12 November 
2014. After nine years with the Company, Mark Clare stepped 
down from his position as Chief Executive on 30 June 2015 and 
from the Board on 31 July 2015. 

Appointments and succession
Following Mark Clare’s informal indication that he was 
considering retiring, the Board, through its Nomination 
Committee, began the search for a new Chief Executive supported 
by an external search consultant. Candidates for the position 
were considered from both inside and outside the business. 
David Thomas, Group Finance Director of the Company, was 
identified as the most suitable candidate for the position. As a 
result, the search for a new Group Finance Director commenced 
using different external search consultants. On 18 June 2015, 
we announced the appointment of Neil Cooper to the position of 
Chief Financial Officer Designate. Full details of the recruitment 
process can be found on page 64. Until Neil Cooper commences 
his role as Chief Financial Officer, David Thomas will fulfil both 
this and the Chief Executive role. The Chairman and the Board 
are conscious of the need to maintain good governance practices 
throughout this period. They have, therefore, assessed the 
robustness and effectiveness of the Group’s internal controls and 
procedures to ensure that they remain appropriate to mitigate 
against any significant risks arising during the period David 
assumes this dual role.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements50

Governance – Chairman’s introduction continued
Overview

a  Leadership

a  Effectiveness

Your Board is collectively responsible for the long term success 
of your Company. Accordingly, the Directors constructively 
challenge proposals relating to strategy, performance, 
responsibility and accountability. This seeks to ensure 
that all decisions are well considered, justified and of the 
highest quality.

Your Board continuously reviews its balance of skills, 
experience, independence and knowledge to ensure that they 
remain appropriate to enable it to discharge its duties and 
responsibilities effectively. The Board undertakes an annual 
evaluation of its own effectiveness and that of its Committees 
and of individual Directors. 

This section details the structure and composition of the Board 
and its Committees, how responsibilities are divided amongst 
the Board, its Committees and individual directors, the main 
activities of the Board during FY15 and its main focus areas 
for FY16.

This section outlines the Board evaluation process undertaken 
in FY15, the outcomes and progress made with the actions 
arising from the FY14 evaluation. It also sets out the induction 
process used for new directors.

      See pages 51 to 55

      See pages 56 to 58

a  Accountability

a  Relations with shareholders

Your Board is mindful of the risk environment in which it 
operates when making any decisions. It maintains sound risk 
management and internal control systems and regularly 
reviews the principal risks and assesses the appropriate 
appetite for risk in striving to achieve the Company’s 
strategic objectives.

This section provides details on the Board’s approach to risk 
management, its internal controls and risk management 
systems and its processes for evaluating reporting on the 
Company is fair, balanced and understandable.

Your Board recognises the importance of maintaining open 
dialogue with its shareholders, both private and institutional. 
A number of events and communications take place on an 
annual basis to regularly communicate with shareholders 
and to encourage their participation.

This section summarises how the Board and individual 
Directors engaged with shareholders throughout FY15 and 
how the shareholders can communicate with the Company.

      See page 59

      See pages 60 to 61

a  Remuneration

The Board, through its Remuneration Committee, has 
established a formal and transparent procedure for 
developing its policy on executive remuneration. The Group’s 
Remuneration Policy was presented to, and approved by, 
shareholders at the 2014 AGM and is designed to promote the 
long term success of the Group. No changes are proposed to 
the policy for FY16. 

This section summarises the Group’s Remuneration Policy, 
how the policy operated during FY15 and how it will be applied 
in FY16. 

      See pages 75 to 95

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201551

Corporate governance report  
Leadership

Board composition, diversity and experience (as at 30 June 2015)

Board composition
(excluding the Chairman)

Non-Executive Director tenure  
(including the Chairman)

 40%0-3 years
 60%3+ years

 Executive Directors

 Independent Non-Executive Directors

3

5

Gender split

Experience

Business

Housebuilding/ 
Construction

Finance

Marketing

 Male

 Female

75%

25%

Retail development

Commercial development

      See page 65 for details on Board diversity

      See page 33 for details on diversity in the workforce

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements 
 
52

Governance – Corporate governance report – Leadership continued

Board balance
The names, responsibilities and other details of each of the 
Directors of the Board are set out on pages 46 and 47 with 
the composition of the Board on page 51. Currently, the Board 
believes that it has an appropriate balance of Executive and 
independent Non-Executive Directors having regard to the 
size and nature of the business. In addition, the combination 
of the experience and calibre of the Non-Executive Directors 
collectively, having regard to their diverse backgrounds and 
experience and their varying lengths of service, further enhances 
this balance thereby mitigating against the risk of ‘group think’. 

Board independence
The Company recognises the importance of its Non-Executive 
Directors remaining independent throughout their appointment, 
which enables them to provide objective advice and guidance 
to the Executive Directors (and senior managers) through the 
use of their wide business, commercial experience and diverse 
backgrounds. The Non-Executive Directors are also able to 
constructively challenge and scrutinise the performance of the 
Executive Directors, assisting them to assess the integrity of the 
financial information considered by the Board and disclosed to 
the Company’s shareholders. In addition, their independence is of 
utmost importance when considering the appointment or removal 
of Executive Directors and in the determination of succession 
planning for the Board and other key individuals within the Group. 
All of the Non-Executive Directors remained independent during 
the financial year; they have no business or other relationships 
with the Group that might influence their independence or 
judgement (confirmed as part of the annual conflict of interests 
review) (see page 65). Details of their interests as shareholders 
are contained in Table 15 on page 88 of the Remuneration report. 

John Allan joined the Board in August 2014 and was appointed 
Non-Executive Chairman of the Company with effect from 
12 November 2014. He was considered to be independent on 
his appointment to the Board and subsequently as Chairman. 
During the year, the Nomination Committee considered John 
Allan’s other significant commitments, as set out on page 46. 
Taking into account John Allan’s decision to step down from the 
Boards of Dixons Carphone Plc in February 2015, Royal Mail and 
the DHL Foundation in April 2015 and as Chairman of Worldpay in 
September 2015, the Nomination Committee concluded that his 
remaining other commitments do not impinge upon his availability 
to fulfil his duties to the Company. His other commitments were 
also considered during the annual review of effectiveness of the 
Chairman led by the Senior Independent Director and the same 
conclusion was reached.

Key responsibilities of the Board 
The Board has overall responsibility for:

 > promoting the long term success of the Group;

 > the conduct of the business of the Group;

 > ensuring that the obligations to its shareholders and others 

are understood and met;

 > setting the strategic direction of the Group; and

 > ensuring that the Company has adequate resources and 

appropriate controls, values and standards in place to deliver 
its strategy within a framework that enables risk to be identified 
and managed.

a  The Board has an annual standing agenda which has been  
set in accordance with its terms of reference and matters 
reserved specifically to it, see the Company’s website at  
www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk/investors/corporate-
governance/governance-policies

Membership and attendance at Board meetings
Members of the Board throughout the financial year and 
attendance at each of its scheduled meetings are set out in Table 1.

Role

Number of meetings attended

Table 1

Member

Bob Lawson1

John Allan2

Mark Clare3

David Thomas

Steven Boyes

Richard Akers

Chairman

Chairman

Group Chief Executive

Group Finance Director

Chief Operating Officer

Non-Executive Director

Tessa Bamford

Non-Executive Director

Nina Bibby4

Mark Rolfe5

Non-Executive Director

Senior Independent Director

1   Bob Lawson stepped down from his position as Chairman of the Company on 12 November 2014.
2   John Allan joined the Board as a Non-Executive Director and Chairman Designate on 1 August 2014. 

He became Chairman of the Company on 12 November 2014.

3   Mark Clare stepped down from his position as Group Chief Executive on 30 June 2015 and as a 

Director on 31 July 2015.

4   Nina Bibby was unable to attend two Board meetings due to jury service and her attendance being 
required at O2 immediately following the announcement of the proposed acquisition by Hutchison 
Whampoa. Nina reviewed the papers for each of the meetings and provided her comments to the 
Chairman prior to the meetings.

5   Mark Rolfe was unable to attend a meeting due to unavoidable personal circumstances. Mark Rolfe 

reviewed the papers and provided his comments to the Chairman prior to the meeting. 

Note: 
9/ Number of meetings attended whilst a Director. 
/9 Number of meetings held whilst a Director.

An additional meeting was held in March 2015 to approve the 
appointment of David Thomas as Chief Executive, following the 
recommendation of the Nomination Committee. Full details can 
be found on page 64.

3/3

8/8

9/9

9/9

9/9

9/9

9/9

7/9

8/9

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015 
53

How the responsibilities of the Board are divided

The Chairman

 > Leads the Board in the determination of strategy and in the achievement of its objectives;

 > Facilitates the effective contribution of the Non-Executive Directors and constructive relations between Executive and 

Non-Executive Directors;

 > Makes certain that the continued development needs of the Directors are identified and addressed; and

Chief Executive

 > Responsible for delivery of the Board strategy;

 > Ensures effective communication with shareholders. 

 > Responsible for the day-to-day leadership and management of the operational activities of the Group in accordance with overall 

strategy and policy as determined by the Board;

 > Recommends Group strategy to the Board; and

Group Finance Director

Chief Operating Officer

 > Chairs the Executive Committee through which he carries out his duties. 

 > Responsible for devising and implementing the Group’s financial strategy and policies.

 > Responsible for the Group’s housebuilding operations.

The Senior Independent Director 

 > Responsible for evaluating the performance of the Chairman, at least annually;

 > Responsible for ensuring that, where required, he is available to shareholders to:  

(i) address any material issues or concerns which the Chairman and/or Chief Executive have failed to resolve; and  
(ii) listen to their views in order for the Company to gain a balanced understanding of their issues and concerns; and

 > Act as a sounding board for the Chairman and, if necessary, an intermediary for the other Directors.

Independent Non-Executive 
Directors

 > Constructively challenge the Executive Directors;

 > Develop proposals on strategy; and

 > Monitor the implementation of the Group’s strategy within its risk and control framework.

Group General Counsel and 
Company Secretary

 > Supports the Chairman and Chief Executive in fulfilling their duties;

 > Available to all directors for advice and support;

 > Keeps the Board regularly updated on governance matters;

 > Ensures Group policies and procedures are maintained and updated on a regular basis; and

 > Attends, and maintains a record of the matters discussed and approved at, Board and Committee meetings.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements54

Governance – Corporate governance report – Leadership continued

Main activities undertaken during the financial year (including Matters Reserved)
The Board had nine scheduled meetings during the financial year to review and approve various key business proposals  
including those matters specifically reserved to it. The key responsibilities of the Board and its multi-dimensional work  
programme throughout the year are set out below:

Strategy and management

>  Offsite strategic review in January focusing 

on performance against strategy, objectives, 
business plan and budget.

>  Reviewed and approved various material land 

investments/transactions.

>  Received presentations from business functions 

on strategic opportunities for the future.

Board  
activity 2015

Other

>  Undertook collective site visits to 
the Northern and East regions of 
the business.

>  Reviewed and updated management 

succession plans.

Board composition and effectiveness

>  Appointed successors to the positions of 

Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer.

>  Led by the Chairman, internally evaluated 

its own performance and that of its 
Committees and individual Directors.

>  Considered and approved the re-

appointments of Richard Akers and Tessa 
Bamford as Non-Executive Directors.

>  Considered potential conflict of interests.

More information available on pages 56, 64 
and 65

Governance

>  Received updates on and assessed impact 

of changes to regulations such as the 
UK Corporate Governance Code and 
Competition Law.

>  Reviewed internal share dealing control 

processes. 

>  Received updates from each of 

its Committees.

>  Reviewed and approved the Group’s 

sustainability framework.

>  Reviewed and approved principal policies 

such as anti-bribery, competition 
compliance etc.

>  Reviewed and approved matters reserved 
to it, its own terms of reference and those 
for the Chairman, Chief Executive and 
Senior Independent Director. 

>  Established a committee to review  

Non-Executive fees.

Shareholder engagement

>  Reviewed shareholder feedback on half 
and full year results and outcomes from 
investor roadshows.

>  Received presentations from the Group’s 

corporate brokers.

> Met with shareholders at the 2014 AGM.

>  Reviewed the 2014 AGM proxy 

voting figures.

> Reviewed and approved 2014 AGM Notice.

More information available on pages 60 and 61

Financial reporting and controls

>   Reviewed monthly reports on  

performance against budget, forecast  
and three-year plan.

>   Reviewed and approved half and full year 

results and announcements.

>   Assessed if Annual Report and Accounts 
were ‘fair, balanced and understandable’.

>  Approved 2014 Annual Report 

and Accounts.

>  Approved payment of an interim dividend 

and agreed to recommend payment 
of a final dividend and special cash 
payment under the Group’s Capital 
Return Programme.

>  Reviewed the Group’s 
financing agreements.

>  Reviewed and approved process for 

satisfaction of the awards under share 
performance schemes and block 
listing requirements.

More information available on pages 59 
and 69

Risk management and internal controls

>  Reviewed and approved the  

effectiveness of internal control  
and risk management systems.

>  Reviewed the Company’s appetite for 

risk and approved the principal risks and 
uncertainties affecting the business.

>  Received regular updates from the Audit 
Committee in respect of internal and 
external audit reviews. 

>  Undertook six-monthly health and  

safety reviews. 

More information available on pages 40 to 
45, 59 and 69

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201555

How the Board fulfils its responsibilities

Board Committees

Group Management Committees

Audit Committee

Responsible for monitoring the 
effectiveness of the Group’s financial 
statements and its systems for internal 
control and risk management. It also 
monitors the independence, objectivity 
and tenure of the external auditor and 
considers whether the Annual Report 
and Accounts are fair, balanced 
and understandable.

See page 66 for full report

Nomination Committee

Responsible for monitoring the 
composition and balance of the Board 
to ensure that it has the correct skills, 
experience and diversity to successfully 
deliver the strategy of the Group.

See page 62 for full report

Remuneration Committee

Responsible for designing and 
implementing the Group’s overall 
remuneration strategy and policy and 
for setting the remuneration of the 
Executive Directors and members of 
Senior Management directly below 
the Board.

See page 75 for full report

Safety, Health and Environmental 
Committee

Responsible for the stewardship of 
the safety, health and environmental 
issues impacting the business 
including, but not limited to, the Group’s 
compliance with the safety, health and 
environmental management system. 
It also monitors any significant safety, 
health and environmental risks and 
exposure to the business and the steps 
taken to mitigate against these.

See page 73 for full report

The Risk Committee 

Reviews the effectiveness of the Group’s 
internal control policies and procedures 
for the identification, assessment 
and reporting of risks and assessing 
individual key risks on a rolling basis.

The Land Committee 

Reviews and approves all land 
acquisition proposals across the Group. 
Depending on the value of the land 
acquisition or its complex nature 
e.g. high rise apartments or joint 
venture arrangements, Board approval 
may also be required.

The Treasury Operating Committee

Reviews the Group’s funding 
requirements and approval of new debt 
facilities. Additional approval from the 
Board may be required for certain types 
of funding and where the level of funding 
is over and above the levels delegated to 
the Treasury Operating Committee.

The Allotment Committee

Responsible for approving the allotment 
of shares within dilution limits and the 
authority obtained from shareholders.

 The Health and Safety Operations 
Committee

Develops the health and safety strategy 
for the Group; ensures that health and 
safety policies and procedures are 
adequately implemented and adhered 
to throughout the Group; monitors the 
effectiveness of the Group’s health 
and safety systems and keeps abreast 
of changes in legislation surrounding 
safety, health and the environment.

The Operations Committee

Responsible for managing operational 
performance.

Board

Chief Executive Officer

Executive Committee

Supports the Group Chief Executive in 
carrying out the day-to-day management 
of the activities of the Group.

Chief Operating Officer

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements56

Governance – Corporate governance report continued
Effectiveness

All Directors are provided with a rolling three-year schedule of 
proposed meeting dates. Any Director who is unable to attend a 
meeting is invited to provide their views to the Chairman ahead 
of that meeting, having reviewed the agenda, briefing papers 
and management information. Reasons for non-attendance are 
recorded by the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary 
and either he or the Chairman will, thereafter, meet with any 
absent Director to go through any action points which are of 
relevance to that Director. Formal minutes of each Board meeting 
are prepared, circulated and submitted for approval at the 
next meeting.

Development
In January of each year the Board meets for a full day to review 
and develop the overall business strategy of the Group which 
includes presentations from Senior Management within the Group 
as well as external professionals. The areas of focus for this 
review are set out on page 54.

A number of internal presentations and updates were provided 
to Directors on matters impacting the business. These included 
modern methods of construction; best practice on assessing 
if a company’s report is fair, balanced and understandable; 
considering the approach to adopt when undertaking a longer 
term viability assessment in the context of the Company’s  
three-year plan; changes to the Code, model Code requirements 
in respect of share dealings by Directors; and other statutory 
and regulatory changes relevant to the business. The Chairman 
regularly reviews training requirements of, and annually agrees 
development needs with, individual Directors.

Board performance evaluation
In accordance with the Code, the Board is responsible for 
undertaking a formal and rigorous annual evaluation of its 
own performance and that of its Committees. The Chairman is 
responsible for carrying out the evaluation of individual Director's 
performance. An external consultant undertook the performance 
evaluation of the Board and its Committees for the 2012/13 
financial year. Accordingly, an internal process was used for the 
2014/15 evaluation. This was led by the Chairman supported by 
the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary. An externally 
facilitated evaluation will be undertaken in respect of the 2016 
financial year.

Evaluation of the Chairman and Non-Executive Directors
In accordance with the requirements of the Code, the Chairman 
met with the Non-Executive Directors independently of the 
Executive Directors. The Non-Executive Directors, led by the 
Senior Independent Director, met without the Chairman being 
present, to assess the performance of the Chairman and 
provided feedback from the process. There were no issues of 
any substance arising from the Non-Executive Directors’ only 
review or from the review of the Chairman’s performance and 
there was unanimous support for him. In addition, the Chairman 
met with each Director individually to discuss their contribution 
to the Board and their performance during the year under 
review. In addition to these specific meetings the Non-Executive 
Directors also meet without the Executive Directors being present 
either immediately prior to or immediately following committee 
meetings, of which they are all members.

Information and support
The Chairman, with the assistance of the Group General Counsel 
and Company Secretary, ensures that the Board receives 
accurate, timely and clear information. Each Director is issued 
with an agenda, briefing papers and comprehensive operating 
and financial management reports for the period under review, 
generally five working days before any Board meeting. The Group 
General Counsel and Company Secretary attends all Board 
and Committee meetings and all Directors have access to his 
advice and, if necessary, to independent professional advice 
at the Company’s expense to assist with the discharge of their 
responsibilities as Directors.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201557

Induction 
On joining the Company, each new Director participates in a 
full and formal induction process. The aim of the induction is 
to assist the Director to familiarise himself with the business 
and the roles and responsibilities of the Board and members of 
Senior Management. John Allan took part in this process which 
included health and safety training, site visits, meetings with all 
Board members and the Group General Counsel and Company 
Secretary, key external advisers and Senior and Operational 
Management teams across the business. He was also provided 
with an induction pack containing general and specific information 
relating to his role such as a schedule of meetings, copies of 
Board minutes and various policies and procedures, details of his 
duties as a Director of a listed plc and other obligations under the 
various regulations governing the Company. 

As part of his induction, the new Chief Financial Officer Designate 
will undergo a tailored programme of presentations and meetings 
with management along with visits to key offices and sites 
throughout the business to gain a greater understanding of our 
products, processes and policies.

John Allan induction
From May to November 2014, John Allan visited a total 
of 20 sites throughout our six regions. These varied from 
residential to mixed-use sites and represented each of the 
Group’s brands. He also visited the Group Support Centre in 
Leicestershire and spent time with each of the Group functions. 
During his visits John spoke to as many teams as possible 
ranging from divisional management to the sales teams. 
He also received an overview of the region he was visiting and 
various detailed presentations on key developments and issues 
such as customer service and strategic land. 

John Allan visiting the sales office at our Great Denham  
development in the South Midlands.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements58

Governance – Corporate governance report – Effectiveness continued

Areas included in the FY15 evaluation
 > The performance of the Board and its principal Committees 

generally and individually; 

 > Board contribution to strategy and shareholder accountability; 

 > Risk management; 

 > Financial and operating reporting; 

 > Succession planning (including diversity); 

 > Inter-relationships between the Board and its Committees and 

between the Executive and Non-Executive Directors; and

 > Board Committees and decision making. 

Table 2 highlights the progress made during the year against 
the actions arising from the FY14 review and findings from the 
evaluation undertaken in respect of FY15. 

Table 2

2014 Findings

Board composition

Succession planning

Board meetings

Ensure satisfactory skills, experience and 
knowledge are maintained to help deliver the 
Company’s long term strategy and objectives.

Continue to monitor and refresh succession 
plans in line with the needs of the business, not 
just at Board level but at Senior Management 
level too.

Maintain the disciplines enshrined into the 
Board processes such as streamlined papers 
and pre-allocation of sufficient time to consider 
and discuss matters fully.

Progress in 2015

Appointment of new Chief Executive and Chief 
Financial Officer Designate announced on 
27 March 2015 and 18 June 2015 respectively.

Internal appointment of new Chief Executive.

Actions for 2016

Continue to monitor tenure of Non-Executive 
Directors and skills and experience required to 
deliver the Group’s strategy and objectives.

Review diversity throughout the business. 

Increase focus on succession plans for  
Non-Executive Directors (and most notably  
for the Chairman of the Audit Committee)  
and the Senior Management population below 
Board level.

Agendas allocate adequate time for items to be 
discussed.

Action list and timetable for review of strategic 
items and actions explored at the Board annual 
review considered at each meeting.

Standing agendas regularly reviewed to ensure 
items are spread out throughout the year and 
are not concentrated to one or two meetings.

Continue to monitor the level of information 
provided in briefing papers and the number 
of items to be discussed/considered at each 
meeting.

Assess the balance between operational and 
strategical issues to be considered at each 
meeting.

2015 Findings

Actions for 2016

Nomination  
Committee

Audit  
Committee

Safety, Health and  
Environmental Committee

Remuneration  
Committee

All Committees are operating effectively with members understanding what is expected of them to undertake and discharge their responsibilities 
as well as their regulatory requirements.

Focus on succession planning of 
Board and Committee members 
as well as Senior Management.

Assess, in conjunction with the 
Nomination Committee and the 
Board, succession planning of 
Committee members to ensure 
that there is not an over reliance  
on the relevant and recent  
financial expertise of the 
Audit Committee’s Chair.

Oversee embedding of a pro-active 
Health, Safety and Environmental 
plan implemented in FY15 and 
delivery of our goal to maintain a 
5 Star Health and Safety Standard 
award by the British Safety Council. 

Assess the level of interaction 
with remuneration consultants 
in respect of governance issues.

Review fixed and variable 
remuneration structures as 
retention tools for key employees  
in the context of the annual  
policy review.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201559

Accountability

Internal controls and risk management
In accordance with principle C.2.1. of the Code the Board regularly 
reviews the effectiveness of the Group’s system of internal 
controls, including those related to material financial, operational 
and compliance performance and the risk management systems 
(see the Audit Committee report on pages 66 to 72). A risk 
framework has been developed for all business processes by 
the internal audit function and approved by the Audit Committee. 
This framework forms the basis of the internal control audit 
plan for the year ahead, which tests if controls are being applied 
effectively in each operating division. Material issues identified 
during internal audits and follow-up action plans are reviewed 
by the Executive Directors and by the Board on a quarterly basis. 
Any necessary actions are immediately taken to remedy any 
significant failings in the internal control system.

The Group’s system of internal controls is designed to 
manage risks that may impede the achievement of the Group’s 
business objectives rather than to eliminate those risks 
entirely. The system of internal controls therefore provides 
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance against material 
misstatement or loss. The system of internal controls does, 
however, provide reasonable assurance that potential issues 
can be identified promptly and appropriate remedial action taken. 
Further details can be found in the Risk management section 
of the Strategic Report (pages 40 to 45). 

The Group operates internal controls to ensure that the 
Group’s Financial Statements are reconciled to the underlying 
financial ledgers. A review of the consolidated accounts 
and Financial Statements is completed by management to 
ensure that the financial position and results of the Group 
are appropriately reflected.

The Board has not identified nor been advised of any failings 
or weaknesses which it has determined to be significant. 
Therefore, a confirmation of necessary actions has not been 
considered appropriate.

Fair, balanced and understandable
As part of its considerations, the Board reflected upon the  
feedback shareholders provided in respect of our 2013/14 Annual  
Report and Accounts (including the Remuneration Policy). It  
established an appropriate timetable to provide adequate time  
to review and discuss significant areas of the 2014/15 Annual  
Report and Accounts. 

The Board also assessed the tone, balance and language of the 
documentation, being mindful of the requirements of the Code 
and the need for consistency between the narrative section of the 
Report and the Financial Statements in arriving at its conclusion 
in respect of fair, balanced and understandable. The Board’s 
formal statement on the Annual Report and Accounts being fair, 
balanced and understandable is contained within the Directors’ 
Responsibility Statement on page 102.

See page 69 for the process undertaken by the Audit Committee 
to assist the Board in assessing if the Annual Report and 
Accounts were fair, balanced and understandable.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements60

Governance – Corporate governance report continued
Relations with shareholders

2014 
Activity

July

August

September

October

November

December

 > Post year end 
trading update.

 > Full year results  

preparation.

 > Private client brokers  

roadshow.

 > Annual update on 
remuneration to 
major investors and 
principal investor 
advisory groups.

 > Full year results  
announcement  
and analyst  
presentation.

 > UK and US roadshow  
following the full  
year results  
announcement.

 > Institutional broker 
sales desk briefings.

 > Bank of America 
Merrill Lynch 
Building & 
Infrastructure  
Conference.

 > Institutional broker  
sales desk briefings.

 > Private client brokers  

roadshow.

 > Private client brokers 

group meeting.

 > Q1 interim  

management 
statement and Annual 
General Meeting.

 > Citi Building  
Conference.

 > Institutional broker  
sales desk briefings.

 > Top shareholders  
and key investor  
roundtable chaired  
by CEO and senior  
management team.

 > AGM.

Ad hoc meetings with existing and potential investors and sell-side analysts.

The Board recognises the importance of having an effective 
relationship with its shareholders and other stakeholders. 
The Group has arrangements in place which enable it to 
communicate effectively with shareholders in respect of matters 
such as business strategy, governance, remuneration and any 
senior management or Board changes. It also conducts regular 
institutional investor meetings after the release of the Annual 
and Interim results and following the publication of each interim 
management statement. 

In order to ensure that all Directors are aware of, and have a clear 
understanding of, the views of major shareholders, the Group 
Finance Director reports regularly to the Board on the Company’s 
investor relations activities. Additionally, the Company’s brokers 
presented an analysis of investor feedback to the July 2015 
board meeting. 

Any announcement published via the Regulatory Information 
Service including the interim and annual reports, interim 
management statements and trading updates and Company 
announcements can be found on the Company’s website at 
www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk/investors. 

The Group Chief Executive and the Group Finance Director 
meet regularly with investors and analysts in order to convey 
an understanding of the market and the Group’s operations 
and objectives. These meetings take place throughout the 
year but particularly after the annual and interim results 
announcements. In FY15, the Directors attended a total of 
222 investor meetings (142 one to one meetings and 80 group 
meetings). In addition they attended a number of conferences 
and investor roadshows in the UK and the US. The Chairman and 
other Non-Executive Directors also have the opportunity to attend 
meetings with major shareholders at the request of either party. 
The Senior Independent Director is available to meet with major 
shareholders, as and when required, to gain an understanding of 
any issues and concerns. 

During the year, the Chairman of the Remuneration Committee 
consulted with major investors and the principal investor advisory 
groups on the proposed remuneration outcomes for FY15 and 
the Group’s approach to remuneration, in accordance with the 
remuneration policy approved at the 2014 AGM, for FY16.

All Directors, including the Chairmen of the Committees, attend the 
AGM and are available to answer shareholder questions. The notice 
of each AGM and related papers are circulated to all shareholders 
at least 20 working days before the meeting. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201561

2015 
Activity

January

February

March 

April

May

June

 > Post half year end 
trading update.

 > Institutional broker 
sales desk briefings.

 > Half year results 

announcement and 
analyst presentation.

 > UK roadshow  

following the half  
year results  
announcement.

 > Institutional broker 
sales desk briefings.

 > Institutional broker 
sales desk briefings.

 > Private client 

brokers roadshow.

 > Q3 trading update.

 > Institutional broker 

sales desk briefings. 

 > Credit Suisse 
European 
Building Conference.

 > UBS UK 

Housing Seminar.

 > Investor and 

sell-side analyst 
perception studies.

Ad hoc meetings with existing and potential investors and sell-side analysts.

Major shareholders 
In accordance with the UKLA’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules (the ‘DTRs’), all notifications received by the Company are published 
on the Company’s website www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk and via a Regulatory Information Service.

As at 30 June 2015, the persons set out in Table 3 have notified the Company, pursuant to DTR 5.1, of their interests in the voting rights 
in the Company’s issued share capital.

Table 3 – Notifiable Interests 

Name 

Capital Research and Management Company

FMR LLC

Standard Life Investments Ltd

Number of 
voting rights1

109,303,356

34,579,199 

47,711,714

% of total issued share 
capital when notified

11.019

8.24

4.94

Nature of holding

Indirect

Indirect

Direct & Indirect

1   Represents the number of voting rights last notified to the Company by the respective shareholder in accordance with DTR 5.1. 

Between 1 July 2015 and 8 September 2015 the following changes in respect of interests in the voting rights in the Company’s issued 
share capital have been notified to the Company:

Name

Capital Research and Management Company

1  Based on the Total Voting Rights as at the relevant notification dates. 

Number of 
voting rights1

109,053,397

% of total issued 
share capital1

10.955

Nature of holding

Indirect

The Total Voting Rights of the Company as at the date of this Annual Report and Accounts, as announced on 1 September 2015, 
are 995,862,989.

On behalf of the Board

Tom Keevil 
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements62

Nomination Committee report
Statement from the Chairman of the Nomination Committee

John Allan
Nomination Committee 
Chairman

“ It has been a busy year for the Nomination 
Committee in terms of changes to the composition 
of the Executive Directors. The key focus has 
been on ensuring that any new appointments 
complement the skills, experience and diversity 
of the current Board members whilst addressing 
any skills gaps and contributing to the continued 
refreshment of the Board.” 

a Key achievements in FY15

 > Selected and recommended the promotion of David 

Thomas to the position of Chief Executive;

 > Selected and recommended the appointment 
of Neil Cooper as the Chief Financial Officer 
Designate; and

I am pleased to present my first report as the Chairman of the 
Nomination Committee. The Nomination Committee plays a vital 
role within the business ensuring that the Company is headed by 
an effective Board which is collectively responsible for the long 
term success of the Company. 

The role of the Nomination Committee entails:

 > monitoring the composition, structure and size of the Board;

 > evaluating the balance of skills, experience, independence 

 > Reviewed and recommended the re-appointment 

and knowledge of each of the members;

of Richard Akers and Tessa Bamford.

 > making recommendations to the Board in respect of any 

a Areas for focus in FY16

 > Review succession plans for Board members (in 
particular Non-Executive Directors) and senior 
management; and

 > Facilitate an external performance evaluation of the 

Board and its Committees.

changes required; 

 > leading the process for board appointments; 

 > regularly reviewing the time commitment required from the 
Chairman and the Non-Executive Directors to satisfactorily 
fulfil their roles; and

 > considering and, if deemed appropriate, authorising conflict 

of interests.

a  Nomination Committee Terms of Reference: 

www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk/investors/corporate-
governance/governance-policies 

John Allan 
Chairman of the Nomination Committee

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Governance63

Main activities undertaken during the financial year
The Nomination Committee met formally on four occasions during the year primarily to progress the appointments of a new Chief 
Executive and a new Chief Financial Officer Designate. A number of informal meetings, conference calls and discussions also took 
place between Nomination Committee members, search consultants and potential candidates throughout the recruitment process.

The main areas focused on by the Nomination Committee during the year were as follows:

Succession planning

>  Appointed recruitment consultants, Korn Ferry 

and Russell Reynolds Associates, to assist 
respectively with the succession planning to 
appoint a new Chief Executive and Chief Financial 
Officer. 

>  Recommended to the Board potential candidates 

to succeed the Chief Executive and Chief Financial 
Officer respectively.

More information available on page 64 

Committee effectiveness

>  Reviewed and made progress against 

matters arising from the 2014 
annual evaluation.

>  Undertook an internal evaluation of its 

own performance.

>  Reviewed and devised an action plan to 

address the issues arising from the 2015 
annual evaluation.

More information available on page 58 

Board composition and balance

>  Reviewed skills, experience and knowledge 

of each Board member.

>  Reviewed the tenure of each of the  

Non-Executive Directors.

>  Considered and recommended to  
the Board the re-appointments of  
Richard Akers and Tessa Bamford  
as Non-Executive Directors.

More information available on pages 51 
and 64

Nomination 
Committee 
activity 2015

Governance

>  Considered and confirmed the independence 
of and commitment to the role for each Non-
Executive Director.

>  Considered and recommended to the Board the 
authorisation of the potential conflict of interest 
following John Allan’s appointment as Chairman 
of Tesco PLC.

>  Undertook its annual review, and recommended 
to the Board authorisation of existing Directors’ 
potential conflicts of interest.

>  Reviewed and approved its annual agenda and 

terms of reference.

More information available on pages 52 to 65

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements64

Governance – Nomination Committee report continued

Membership and attendance at meetings
The membership of the Nomination Committee and the 
attendance at each of its scheduled meetings is set out in  
Table 4. I became a member of the Nomination Committee on 
1 August 2014 and succeeded Bob Lawson as its Chairman with 
effect from 12 November 2014. I chair all meetings, unless they 
relate to the appointment of my own successor. In accordance 
with Code provision B.2.1., I confirm that the majority of Board 
members (including the Non-Executive Directors) are considered 
independent by the Company.

Table 4

Member

Bob Lawson1

John Allan2

Richard Akers

Tessa Bamford

Nina Bibby

Mark Clare3

Mark Rolfe4

Role

Chairman

Chairman

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Number of meetings attended

1/1

2/2

3/3

3/3

3/3

3/3

2/3

1  Bob Lawson stepped down from his position as Chairman on 12 November 2014.
2  John Allan became a member on 1 August 2014 and Chairman on 12 November 2014.
3   Mark Clare did not attend any meetings or parts thereof, at which the appointment of his successor 

was being discussed.

4   Mark Rolfe was unable to attend a meeting due to unavoidable personal circumstances. Mark Rolfe 

reviewed the papers and provided his comments to the Chairman prior to the meeting.

Note: 
4/ Number of meetings attended whilst a Director.
/4  Number of meetings held whilst a Director.

Appointment and re-appointment of Directors 
The Nomination Committee leads the process for appointments 
to the Board and makes recommendations to the Board when 
suitable candidates have been identified. When a vacancy arises 
the Nomination Committee evaluates the balance of skills, 
experience, independence and knowledge on the Board. It then 
prepares a description of the roles and capabilities required for 
that appointment. The search for Board candidates is carried 
out, and appointments are made, based on merit having regard 
to the need to maintain a balance of skills and experience on 
the Board, diversity and, where appropriate, refreshment of 
Board memberships. External recruitment consultants are 
used where appropriate.

Appointment of Chief Executive and Chief Financial  
Officer Designate
During the year the Nomination Committee undertook a process 
to identify a suitable candidate to take over as Chief Executive 
from Mark Clare when he retired from this position on 30 June 
2015. An informal meeting of the Non-Executive Directors took 
place in October 2014 to discuss succession planning in light of 
Mark Clare’s informal notification to the Chairman that he was 
considering stepping down as Chief Executive in 2015. As part of 
this meeting, the Non-Executive Directors assessed the skills  
and experience required to fulfil the Chief Executive’s role. 
Korn Ferry, an independent recruitment firm, was duly appointed 
to assist with the search for a new Chief Executive. A list of 

candidates of both genders was prepared and reviewed by the 
Nomination Committee in early 2015. At an additional meeting 
in March 2015, the Nomination Committee proceeded to arrive 
at a shortlist and after consideration unanimously concluded 
that David Thomas, then Group Finance Director, was the best 
candidate to succeed Mark Clare as the Chief Executive and to 
make such recommendation to the Board. 

Following this decision, the Nomination Committee proceeded 
to search for a new Group Finance Director. Russell Reynolds 
Associates, another leading executive research practice, were 
appointed as search consultants. A list of potential candidates, 
both internal and external, was created and filtered down into a 
short list. Interviews were initially conducted by David Thomas 
and Rob Tansey, the Group’s HR Director. The shortlisted 
candidates then met all members of the Nomination Committee 
and Steven Boyes. It was unanimously agreed by the Nomination 
Committee that the appointment of Neil Cooper as Chief Financial 
Officer Designate be recommended to the Board. 

Both appointments were recommended to, and unanimously 
approved by the Board. The Nomination Committee confirms 
that neither Korn Ferry nor Russell Reynolds have any other 
connections with the Company.

Re-appointment of Non-Executive Directors
Non-Executive Directors are appointed, subject to re-election 
by shareholders and statutory provisions relating to the removal 
of Directors, by the Board, for an initial three-year term and 
normally serve a second three-year term. Beyond this a third 
term of up to three years may be served subject to particularly 
rigorous review and taking into account the need for progressive 
refreshment of the Board. The Articles, in accordance with the 
Code, require any Non-Executive Director who has served nine 
years or more on the Board continuously to be subject to annual 
re-appointment. 

The letters of appointment of all Non-Executive Directors are 
available for inspection by any person at the Company’s registered 
office during normal office hours or via the Company’s website 
www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk, copies will also be available at 
the 2015 AGM for 15 minutes before and throughout the meeting. 
The letters of appointment clearly set out the time commitment 
expected from each Non-Executive Director to ensure they 
satisfactorily perform their duties. Each Non-Executive Director 
confirms that they are able to allocate the time commitment 
required at the time of their appointment and thereafter as part 
of their individual annual effectiveness review undertaken by 
the Chairman.

During the year, the Nomination Committee considered the 
re-appointment of Richard Akers (having served three years) 
and Tessa Bamford (who has served six years) to the Board. 
The Nomination Committee was satisfied that both Richard and 
Tessa, remained independent and would be able to continue to 
dedicate sufficient time to fulfil their roles as Non-Executive 
Directors of the Company. Accordingly, they were re-appointed 
for a further three-year term, being a second three-year term for 
Richard and a third three-year term for Tessa.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201565

Retirement and re-election of Directors
The Articles currently require Directors to submit themselves for 
re-election by shareholders at the first AGM following their initial 
appointment to the Board and thereafter at intervals of no more 
than three years. All Board members will, however, in accordance 
with the Code, stand for re-election by the shareholders at the 
2015 AGM irrespective of their date of appointment and length 
of service on the Board.

Biographical details of each of the Directors and supporting 
statements for their re-election are set out on pages 46 and 
47 of this report and in the Notice of the 2015 AGM. Details of 
the Executive Directors’ service contracts can be found in the 
Remuneration report on page 81. 

Each of the Directors has been subject to a formal performance 
evaluation process and the Nomination Committee, and the 
Board, are satisfied that they each continue to be effective 
in, and demonstrate commitment to, their respective roles. 
The Board, therefore, recommends that shareholders approve 
the resolutions to be put forward at the 2015 AGM relating to the 
re-election of all Directors.

Directors’ conflicts of interest
On 1 October 2008, the Companies Act 2006 (the ‘Act’) codified 
the duty to avoid conflicts of interest, by which Directors have a 
duty to avoid a situation in which they have, or may have, a direct 
or indirect conflict of interest or possible conflict of interest with 
the Company. This duty applies to the exploitation of any property, 
information or opportunity regardless of whether the Company 
could have taken advantage of it. The Articles were amended at 
the AGM held on 18 November 2008 to include a general power 
for the Board to authorise such conflicts. 

The Board has, in accordance with the Articles and best practice 
guidance, authorised the Nomination Committee to oversee the 
process for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board 
concerning any actual or potential conflicts of interest which arise 
or may arise in relation to each member of the Board, including 
details of any terms and conditions which it deems necessary to 
impose on any authorisation given. This process was carried out 
satisfactorily during the year in respect of all Directors, including 
Neil Cooper, prior to his appointment becoming effective. 

The Group General Counsel and Company Secretary maintains 
a register of Directors’ conflict of interests which is reviewed 
annually. Following this review he will make recommendations 
to the Board in respect of any changes to the authorisations, or 
terms and conditions applied, that may be required. Each Director 
is responsible for notifying, and is aware of their responsibility 
to notify, the Chairman and/or the Board of any new conflict or 
possible conflict and of any change in circumstances relating 
to authorisations already given. The Board, when authorising 
any conflict or possible conflict of interest, does not count in the 
quorum the Director whose conflict or possible conflict is being 
discussed and reserves the right to exclude a Director from a 
meeting whilst a conflict or possible conflict is being considered. 
The Board may revoke or vary any authorisation at any time.

Board gender diversity policy
During the year, the Nomination Committee reviewed the Group’s 
policy on Gender Diversity in light of the recommendations 
contained within Lord Davies’ report, ‘Women on Boards’, as part 
of its annual effectiveness exercise. This policy was in turn also 
considered by the Board. The Nomination Committee’s primary 
goal remains to identify the most appropriate candidates to join 
the Board and other senior positions within the Group. However, 
in accordance with its terms of reference it also seeks to ensure 
that in considering succession planning it has due regard to the 
benefits of diversity for the Board, including gender. Accordingly, 
the Board will continue to work only with recruitment search 
consultants who have adopted a voluntary code of conduct 
addressing gender diversity. The Board has agreed not to impose 
a quota regarding gender balance. The Nomination Committee 
and the Board do however recognise the need to ensure that the 
business reflects a diverse workforce, at all levels of seniority, 
when considering Board appointments and internal promotions, 
whilst always seeking to ensure that each post is offered strictly 
on merit to the best available candidate. Promoting diversity 
more generally at a Senior Management level and more generally 
within the workforce is an objective for the Chief Executive and 
HR Director. 

a  Barratt Developments PLC – Diversity Policy 

www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk/sustainability/ 
our-policies

See page 51: Gender split and page 33: Diversity and Inclusion.

This report forms part of the Corporate governance report and is 
signed on behalf of the Nomination Committee by:

John Allan 
Chairman of the Nomination Committee

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements66

Audit Committee report
Statement from the Chairman of the Audit Committee

Mark Rolfe
Audit Committee 
Chairman

“ The Audit Committee has continued to oversee 
carefully the business risk and internal control 
framework during this period of rapid growth, 
whilst addressing the pipeline of governance 
and accounting standard developments. We have 
worked hard to keep our financial reporting ‘fair, 
balanced and understandable’ so that it remains 
relevant and useful to our stakeholders.”

I am pleased to present the Audit Committee report for the 
financial year ended 30 June 2015. The main role of the Audit 
Committee is to:

 > monitor the integrity of the Group’s financial statements and 
any proposed formal announcements relating to the Group’s 
financial performance, including any significant financial 
reporting judgements and whether the Annual Report and 
Accounts are ‘fair, balanced and understandable’;

 > monitor and review the effectiveness of the internal 

audit function;

 > review the Company’s principal risks, systems of internal 

control and risk management; and

 > keep under review the relationship between the Group and the 
external auditor, including their re-appointment, independence 
and objectivity and the effectiveness of the external audit 
process, whilst continually monitoring and, where required, 
challenging the ratio between audit and non-audit fees. 

a  Audit Committee terms of reference – 

www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk/investors/ 
corporate-governance/governance-policies

The following section details the work undertaken by the Audit 
Committee in respect of the financial year under review. 

Mark Rolfe 
Chairman of the Audit Committee

8 September 2015

a Key achievements in FY15

 > Continued to shift emphasis in risk management 

towards operational risk as the business 
continues its strong profitable growth trend, 
supported by management presentations on 
valuation methodology, joint venture processes, 
shared equity portfolio management and 
taxation. Audit Committee briefing papers 
streamlined accordingly;

 > Worked closely with our internal and external audit 
teams to ensure that our internal control processes 
remain robust and our financial reporting clear and 
accurate; and

 > Monitored best practice implementations of the 
2012 UK Corporate Governance Code through 
benchmarking our 2014 Report and Accounts in the 
context of the Financial Reporting Council’s ‘Clear 
and Concise’ initiative. Assessed the implications 
of new reporting standards on Revenue Recognition 
(IFRS 15) and Financial Instruments (IFRS 9) and the 
implications of the 2014 UK Corporate Governance 
Code changes on principal risks, going concern 
and viability.

a Areas for focus in FY16

 > Implement the 2014 UK Corporate Governance 

Code changes in full, having concluded on 
appropriate assumptions for the longer term 
viability statement; and

 > Monitor emerging practice in respect of the 

auditor’s enhanced audit report.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Governance67

Main activities undertaken during the financial year
The Audit Committee follows an annual work programme, which covers the principal responsibilities as set under its terms  
of reference which was fully completed during the year. The main areas focused on by the Audit Committee during the year  
were as follows:

Integrity of financial statements and announcements

>  Analysed drafts of half and full year 

results announcements.

>  Reviewed and addressed key accounting judgements 

and significant issues (see page 68).

>  Assessed proforma financial statements for FY15.

>  Reviewed process established to confirm if 

Annual Report and Accounts are fair, balanced 
and understandable.

>  Considered and approved material accounting policies, 

estimates and judgements. 

>  Assessed and approved pension assumptions. 

>  Received updates on the implications of new accounting 

standards and key regulatory changes. 

More information available on pages 59, 68 and 69

Audit Committee 
activity 2015

Committee effectiveness

>  Reviewed and made progress against 
matters arising from the 2014 annual 
evaluation. 

>  Undertook an internal evaluation of its 

own performance.

>  Reviewed and devised an action plan to 

address the issues arising from the 2015 
annual evaluation.

More information available on page 58

Governance

>  Received updates on proposed corporate 

governance disclosures for the 2015 Annual 
Report and Accounts.

>  Received updates on general corporate 
governance requirements, including in 
particular the steps needed to support 
and underpin the introduction of a viability 
statement in the Annual Report and 
Accounts for FY16.

>  Reviewed and approved its terms 

of reference.

Going concern

>  Assessed the Group’s available facilities, 

headroom and banking covenants.

>  Reviewed management’s detailed analysis, 
which included forecasts and scenarios 
considering potential downturns in the 
housing market.

>  Satisfied itself, and recommended to the 
Board, that the going concern basis of 
preparation continues to be appropriate.

>  Considered the implications of the revised 
disclosure requirements on going concern 
under the UK Corporate Governance Code.

More information available on pages 68  
and 101

Internal control and risk management systems

>  Regularly reviewed the effectiveness of 
internal controls and risk management 
systems in the context of the Company’s 
‘appetite for risk’. 

>  Received regular updates from the 

Risk Committee.

>  Received regular updates from 
the Chief Internal Auditor upon 
whistleblowing and suspected frauds 
and related investigations.

>  Reviewed the policy framework and 

the policies specifically allocated to it.

>  Received updates on the Group’s disaster 

recovery policies and processes.

>  Reviewed and recommended to the Board 
for approval the principal risk disclosures 
for FY15 Annual Report and Accounts.

External audit

>  Agreed external audit plans for the half and full year ends.

>  Reviewed external auditor reports on half and full year 

financial statements.

>  Met with the external audit partner without management 

being present.

>  Assessed the effectiveness and performance of the external audit.

>  Assessed and confirmed the independence of the external auditor.

>  Considered and recommended to the Board the re-appointment 

of Deloitte LLP as the Group’s auditor.

>  Regularly reviewed the ratio between audit to non-audit fees.

>  Reviewed and updated the Policy on Auditor Independence and 

Non-Audit Fees Policy.

More information available on pages 71 and 72

Internal audit

>  Received regular updates from the Chief 
Internal Auditor on matters arising from 
audits undertaken throughout the business.

>  Met with the Chief Internal Auditor without 

management being present.

>  Reviewed and agreed the internal audit plan 

for FY16.

>  Assessed the effectiveness of the internal 

audit function. 

More information available on page 72

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements68

Governance – Audit Committee report continued

Membership and attendance at Audit Committee meetings
In order to provide the Audit Committee with an appropriate mix of 
skills and experience, including financial expertise, all Non-Executive 
Directors sit on the Audit Committee. I can confirm that, in accordance 
with Code provision C.3.1, each of the members is considered to be 
independent and, the Board is satisfied that, as I am a chartered 
accountant and have many years’ experience in various financial 
roles, I have recent and relevant financial experience. There were 
four scheduled meetings during the year. Details of the members 
and attendance at each of the meetings is shown in Table 5.

Table 5 

Member

Mark Rolfe

Richard Akers

Tessa Bamford

Nina Bibby

Role

Chairman

Member

Member

Member

Number of meetings attended

4/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

Note: 
4/ Number of meetings attended whilst a Director. 
/4  Number of meetings whilst a Director. 

In addition to the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, 
representatives from Deloitte LLP and the Chief Internal Auditor 
attended each of the Audit Committee meetings. They met with 
members of the Audit Committee independently of management 
and the Chairman of the Board. The Chief Executive, the Group 
Finance Director and other members of Senior Management also 
attended meetings (or parts thereof), by invitation, as required. 
After each meeting, I have reported to the Board upon business 
undertaken to ensure that all Directors are informed of the Audit 
Committee’s work. 

Significant financial judgements for 2015

a  Significant issues considered during 

the financial year

The significant issues considered by the Audit Committee during the 
financial year and how each of them was addressed is as follows:

Going concern
The Audit Committee:

 > assessed the Group’s available facilities, headroom and 

banking covenants;

 > reviewed management’s detailed analysis, which included 
forecasts and scenarios considering potential downturns  
in the housing market; 

 > satisfied itself, and subsequently the Board, that the going 
concern basis of preparation continues to be appropriate in 
the context of the Group’s funding and liquidity position; and

 > considered the revised disclosure requirements on going 

concern under the Code.

Further details upon the Group’s going concern assessment 
can be found on page 112.

Financial reporting
The Audit Committee reviewed the integrity of the Financial 
Statements of the Group and the Company and all formal 
announcements relating to the Group’s and Company’s financial 
performance. This process included the assessment of the 
following primary areas of judgement and took into account 
the views of Deloitte LLP.

Carrying value of land and work in progress

Available for sale financial assets

Land and work in progress (‘WIP’) are the most 
significant assets of the Group and at 30 June 2015 were 
valued at £4,113.5m. We undertake housebuilding and 
commercial development and the majority of activity 
we carry out is not forward sold before we commence 
development. Accordingly, there is a risk that land and 
WIP may be held at a value more than the lower of cost 
and net realisable (sale) value. The Group conducts half 
yearly reviews of land and WIP carrying value and if the 
estimated net realisable value is lower than the carrying 
value, it impairs the land and WIP value.

The Group holds £107.0m of available for sale financial 
assets which principally comprise interest free loans 
made to purchasers upon the sale of a property and 
secured by way of a second charge. These loans are 
held at fair value and the valuation of them requires a 
number of judgements including the expected market 
value of the property at the date of repayment, the date 
the loan will be repaid and the appropriate rate that 
should be used to discount the value of these loans. 

How the Audit Committee addressed those judgements

Goodwill and intangible assets  
impairment review

The Group has £792.2m of goodwill and £100.0m of 
intangible assets which arose upon the acquisition 
of Wilson Bowden. The Group reviews the carrying 
value of these assets on an annual basis to ensure 
that the present value of the future cash flows that 
the housebuilding business is expected to generate 
is greater than the carrying value of these assets. This 
review includes a number of judgements around the 
estimation of future cash flows and the determination 
of an appropriate rate to discount these cash flows. 

Carrying value of land and work in progress valuation

Available for sale financial assets

The Audit Committee considered land and WIP 
accounting judgements papers at its February, June 
and September meetings. These outlined the review 
process undertaken and the judgements made with 
regards to the estimation of further sales process and 
further build costs. Deloitte LLP reported upon land and 
WIP valuation at the February and September meetings 
in the context of the half year review and year end audit. 
Following detailed consideration of the accounting 
judgements papers and the findings of Deloitte LLP, the 
Audit Committee agreed with the judgements made by 
management and concluded that the valuation of our 
land and WIP remains appropriate.

The Audit Committee considered available for sale 
financial asset accounting judgements papers at its 
February and September meetings. These outlined the 
assumptions made, the sources for these assumptions, 
and the resulting valuation. Deloitte LLP reported 
upon available for sale asset valuation at the February 
and September meetings in the context of the half 
year review and year end audit. Following detailed 
consideration of the accounting judgements papers 
and the findings of Deloitte LLP, the Audit Committee 
agreed with the judgements made by management 
and concluded that the valuation of available for sale 
financial assets remains appropriate.

Goodwill and intangible assets  
impairment review

The Audit Committee considered a goodwill and 
intangible assets accounting judgements paper at its 
September meeting. This outlined the assumptions 
made, the sources for these assumptions, and the 
resulting valuation. Deloitte LLP reported upon goodwill 
and intangible assets valuation at the September 
meeting in the context of the year end audit. Following 
detailed consideration of the accounting judgements 
paper and the findings of Deloitte LLP, the Audit 
Committee agreed with the judgements made by 
management and concluded that the valuation of 
goodwill and intangible assets remains appropriate.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201569

Amongst other matters, the risks reviewed by management, 
the Audit Committee and the Board include: 

>  economic environment, including housing demand and 

mortgage availability;

> land and strategic land option purchasing;

> liquidity;

> attracting and retaining high-calibre employees;

>  availability of raw materials, suppliers of products of the quality 
required and suitably qualified subcontractors and labourers;

> Government regulation, housebuilding and planning policy;

> construction and new technologies;

> joint ventures and consortia;

> safety, health and environmental; and

> IT.

Details of the management of risk system utilised and the 
principal risks and uncertainties and their relevance to the 
operations and financial performance of the Group are set out in 
Risk management on pages 40 to 45 of the Strategic Report; and

iv)  assessment of compliance with the internal control and 

risk management systems. This assessment is supported 
by the Group’s internal audit team which is responsible for 
undertaking an annual audit plan, ad hoc audits and reporting 
to the Audit Committee, and, if necessary, the Board, on the 
operation and effectiveness of those systems and any material 
failings with them. The planned programme of audit appraisals 
across Group operations is approved by the Audit Committee. 
It includes full divisional audits and targeted audits of key risk 
areas such as the land viability process, land acquisition cost 
controls and monitoring WIP and subcontractor payment 
controls. Where the internal audit team does not have the 
expertise or resources required to conduct complex audits 
they use external expertise. 

Fair, balanced and understandable
The Audit Committee also undertook a detailed process to 
consider whether the 2015 Annual Report and Accounts were 
fair, balanced and understandable. It considered the feedback 
provided by shareholders in respect of the 2014 Annual Report 
and Accounts, the Group’s trading updates and the information 
that the Board had received throughout the year. The Audit 
Committee received an early draft of the 2015 Annual Report 
and Accounts (including the risk management statement and 
principal risks disclosure) to allow itself sufficient time to review 
the disclosures therein. It also received a report from the Group 
General Counsel and Company Secretary which confirmed that: 
(i) the Annual Report and Accounts had been reviewed by the 
Group Executive Directors; and (ii) the Company had received 
confirmation from its external advisers, that the Annual Report 
and Accounts adhered to the requirements of the Code and 
relevant rules and regulations. The Audit Committee then 
assessed, at its September 2015 meeting, whether the Annual 
Report and Accounts were fair, balanced and understandable. 
It reviewed the processes underpinning the compilation and 
assurance of the Annual Report and Accounts, in relation to 
the financial and non-financial management information. It also 
reviewed the internal processes underpinning the Group’s 
reporting governance framework and the reviews and findings 
of the Group’s external legal advisers and the auditor. The Audit 
Committee concluded that the 2015 Annual Report and Accounts 
were fair, balanced and understandable and recommended as 
such to the Board. 

The effectiveness of internal controls and the risk 
management process 
The Audit Committee plays a vital role in managing the 
effectiveness of internal controls and the risk management 
process on behalf of the Board. The key aspects of the Group’s 
system of internal control and risk management framework are 
as follows:

i)   a clear organisational structure with defined levels of authority 

and responsibility for each operating division;

ii)   financial and management reporting systems under which 

financial and operating performance is consistently reviewed 
against budget and forecasts at divisional, regional and Group 
levels on a monthly basis;

iii)  identification and review of principal operational risk 
areas to ensure they are embedded in the Group’s 
monthly management reporting system. This is so that 
the identification and control of risk are a routine aspect 
of management responsibility. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements70

Governance – Audit Committee report continued

The Group’s operations and financing arrangements expose it to 
a variety of financial risks that include the effects of changes in 
borrowing and debt profiles, government policy, market prices, 
credit risks, liquidity risks and interest rates. The most significant 
of these to the Group is liquidity risk. Accordingly, there is a 
regular, detailed system for the reporting and forecasting of cash 
flows from the operations to Group management to ensure that 
risks are promptly identified and appropriate mitigating actions 
taken. These forecasts are further stress tested at a Group level 
on a regular basis to ensure that adequate headroom within 
facilities and banking covenants is maintained. In addition, the 
Group has in place a risk management programme that seeks 
to limit the adverse effects of the other risks on its financial 
performance, in particular by using financial instruments, 
including debt and derivatives, to hedge interest and currency 
rates. The Group does not use derivative financial instruments for 
speculative purposes. Activities are delegated, by the Board, to a 
centralised Treasury Operating Committee, which in turn reports 
to the Board. The treasury department implements guidelines 
that are established by the Board, in accordance with approved 
treasury policies, and the Treasury Operating Committee. 

During the year the Audit Committee:

 > reviewed the effectiveness of risk management and internal 

controls in relation to material financial risks; 

 > reviewed a number of process improvements and confirmed 
that the risk management and internal control systems had 
been in place throughout the year ended 30 June 2015 and that 
they and their effectiveness accord with the Code;

 > provided regular reports to the Board in respect of its 

findings on the effectiveness of the internal controls and risk 
management process, in order to assist the Board with its 
assessment that sound risk management and internal control 
systems have been maintained throughout the year which seek 
to safeguard shareholders’ investments as well as the Group’s 
assets (in accordance with principle C.2 of the Code); 

 > assisted the Board to determine the nature and extent of the 
significant risks that it is appropriate for the Group to take to 
achieve its strategic objectives and to be assured that Executive 
Directors and Senior Management continue to implement and 
maintain the Group’s internal control and risk management 
systems within the governance and policy framework approved 
by the Board;

 > spent time with management below Board level to understand 

risks and controls in a number of areas of the business 
including: cascading of internal control and risk management 
policies within the business; onsite IT systems; risk of 
cyber attacks to the business; supply chain risks; and the 
enhancement of financial control following the continued 
increase in volume of homes built;

 > reviewed in detail the output of the six monthly controls  

self-certification process from each of the divisions;

 > considered all whistleblowing and suspected fraud reports 

and actions;

 > reviewed all internal audit results and action plans;

 > received regular reports from the Risk Committee in respect 

of the work it had undertaken to review the effectiveness 
of the Group’s internal control policies and procedures for 
the identification, assessment and reporting of risks and for 
assessing individual key risks on a rolling basis;

 > reviewed the concurrency of the principal risks and the risk 
management framework to determine if the descriptions of 
their operation were up to date, the system of internal control 
remains effective and reported their findings to the Board 
when considering the draft interim and full year Financial 
Statements; assisted the Executive Committee to prioritise 
the risk framework by identifying the risks considered most 
significant to the Group and assessed their potential impact on 
the business of any risks identified; and 

 > assessed the structure deployed by the Group when assessing 
risks. This is set out in Risk management on pages 40 to 45 of 
the Strategic Report. 

The Audit Committee is pleased with the progress with its short 
and medium term work programmes to date, and recognises 
that work will need to be continued in these areas during the next 
financial year.

Review of accounting policies
The Audit Committee considered the impact of the accounting 
standards adopted in the year and reviewed the Group’s progress 
on projects to consider the impact of both IFRS 9 ‘Financial 
Instruments’ and IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with 
customers’ upon the Group’s accounting policies and financial 
statements. Further information on the impact of accounting 
standards is on page 118. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201571

External auditor
i) Re-appointment of auditor
The Audit Committee considered the re-appointment of Deloitte 
LLP as the auditor to the Company and whether to tender the 
external audit in respect of the 2015/16 financial year. In arriving 
at its conclusion, the Audit Committee took into account: 

>  feedback on the effectiveness of the external audit from 

divisional, regional and Group management who were closely 
involved in both the interim and year end reporting process;

>  the Code’s requirement to put the external audit out to tender 
every ten years. Deloitte LLP was appointed as the auditor of 
the Company through an external tender process in 2007; 

>  the appointment of Mark Goodey as the lead audit partner 

during FY13; 

>  FRC guidance and the Code which suggest that the 

tendering should normally align with the five-yearly cycle 
of partner rotation; 

>  Deloitte LLP’s objectivity and independence; 

>  Deloitte LLP’s performance against the audit plan for the 

2014/15 financial year; and 

>  the quality of advice and assistance brought to bear and 

received throughout the year.

The Audit Committee concluded that Deloitte LLP’s performance 
as auditor to the Company continues to be satisfactory and 
that it was not necessary to consider a tender process this 
year. Mark Goodey will continue to act in this capacity until the 
conclusion of the 2017 audit subject to satisfactory performance. 
The Audit Committee will assess its tendering arrangements 
towards the conclusion of Mark Goodey’s period in office, or 
earlier if it has reason to do so. Accordingly, it recommended 
to the Board that a resolution re-appointing Deloitte LLP as 
the auditor to the Company be proposed at the 2015 AGM. 
That recommendation was subsequently endorsed by the Board. 

There are no contractual obligations which restrict the Audit 
Committee’s choice of External Auditor.

ii) Audit effectiveness 
The Audit Committee assessed the effectiveness of the external 
audit and concluded that the audit process as a whole had been 
conducted robustly and that the team selected to undertake the 
audit had done so thoroughly and professionally. In coming to this 
conclusion the Audit Committee reviewed amongst other matters:

>  Deloitte LLP’s fulfilment of the agreed audit plan and the 

absence of any variations from it;

>  reports highlighting the material issues and accounting 
judgements that arose during the conduct of the audit;

>  feedback from Group and Regional management finance 
functions and the Chief Internal Auditor evaluating the 
performance of the audit; and

>  the report from the FRC’s Audit Quality Review Team.

iii) Auditor independence and non-audit fees policy
The Audit Committee formally reviewed the policy which the 
Company has implemented on Auditor Independence and Non-
Audit Fees (the ‘Policy’) during the year. The Policy sets out the 
duties of the Audit Committee and the limited range of services 
which the auditor may provide without requiring prior approval 
of the Audit Committee. Any services outside this scope must 
be approved by the Audit Committee in order to maintain auditor 
independence and to monitor non-audit fees incurred by the 
Group. The Policy also sets out a number of services which 
the External Auditor is excluded from providing to the Group. 
These include:

>  bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records 

or Financial Statements;

>  financial information systems design and implementation 
relating to the Financial Statements or accounting records;

>  appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or 

contributions-in-kind;

>  actuarial services;

>  internal audit outsourcing services;

>  management functions or human resources;

>  broker or dealer, investment adviser, or investment 

banking services;

>  legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and

> executive recruiting.

Under the Policy the Company is required to, and does, obtain 
written confirmation from Deloitte LLP that they remain 
independent on an annual basis. Deloitte LLP have also provided 
a comprehensive report to the Audit Committee verifying that 
they have performed their audit and audit-related services in line 
with independence requirements and assessing why Deloitte 
LLP believe they remain independent within the requirements of 
the applicable regulations and their own professional standards, 
which were conclusions that the Audit Committee endorsed. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements72

Governance – Audit Committee report continued

In reaching these conclusions the Audit Committee reviewed, 
amongst other matters:

>  a report from Deloitte LLP describing their arrangements 
to identify, report and manage any conflicts of interest; 

>  the extent of the non-audit services provided by Deloitte LLP; 

and

>  the ratio of audit to non-audit fees.

As part of its review of the policy, the Audit Committee took the 
opportunity to tighten the restrictions on the recruitment of 
employees from Deloitte LLP, so that no employee (at whatever 
level of seniority) involved in the Company’s audit for a two-year 
preceding period can be hired without the pre-approval of each 
of the Chairman of the Company, the Chair of the Audit Committee 
and the Chief Financial Officer.

iv) Non-audit services
The Audit Committee continually monitored the ratio between 
audit to non-audit fees to ensure that they remained within the 
1:1 ratio prescribed in the policy. At the end of FY15, non-audit 
fees represented 71% of audit fees. Further details of the audit 
(including audit-related) and non-audit fees incurred by the Group 
can be found on page 123. 

The Audit Committee noted that the majority of the non-
audit fees related to audit-related assurance services which 
principally comprise the review of the Group’s interim report, 
taxation compliance (for which Deloitte LLP were appointed 
on 1 December 2010 following a competitive tender process in 
which four of the leading audit firms took part), and also taxation 
advice on various land acquisitions and disposals during the 
year. Accordingly, the Audit Committee was satisfied that the 
work performed by Deloitte LLP was appropriate in the context 
of ensuring their independence as auditor, particularly given that 
the audit-related assurance services, relating to the review of 
the Group’s interim report, can only be conducted by the Group’s 
auditor and that the tax advisory services had been managed by 
a partner who has no involvement with the audit of the Group. 
Consequently, the Audit Committee concluded that the level of 
non-audit fees was justified and did not raise any concerns in 
terms of Deloitte LLP’s independence as auditor to the Group. 
Deloitte LLP have also confirmed, in writing, that they are in 
agreement with this conclusion.

The Audit Committee confirms that there are no independence 
issues in respect of the auditor and that the policy has been 
appropriately complied with throughout the year under review. 

Internal Audit function
During the year, the Audit Committee received reports from the 
Chief Internal Auditor on the findings of internal audits conducted 
throughout the business, together with details of the proposed 
actions to rectify any issues identified. In addition, the Audit 
Committee monitors and reviews the systems and processes 
adopted by the internal audit function to ensure that they remain 
fit for purpose.

Audit Committee effectiveness 
The Audit Committee successfully implemented the 
recommendations arising from its 2014 performance evaluation 
and once again, evaluated its own performance and that of its 
members through an internal process led by the Chairman 
of the Audit Committee. The outcome of the review was 
positive, particularly in respect of each member having a clear 
understanding of what is expected of them to undertake and 
discharge their responsibilities. The key area of focus identified 
related to succession planning for members of the Audit 
Committee, in particular, its Chairman.

Whistleblowing 
The Chief Internal Auditor updated the Audit Committee on new 
whistleblowing incidents, ongoing investigations and the outcome 
of any completed investigations. On the back of these updates 
the Audit Committee assessed the adequacy of the Group’s 
whistleblowing policy in accordance with the requirements of the 
Code. It reviewed the whistleblowing procedure adopted by the 
Group, including steps that can be taken to enhance awareness 
of it, to ensure it remains appropriate and adequately allows 
individuals who become aware of possible improper, unethical or 
even illegal behaviour to raise the matter with their manager or 
alternatively refer the matter to a confidential and independent 
telephone number (the ‘Whistleblowing Number’). 

The Whistleblowing Number is available to all employees 
(together with sub-contractors and suppliers) 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week. Any issues reported to the Whistleblowing 
Number are immediately brought to the attention of the 
Chief Internal Auditor. The Chief Internal Auditor reviews and 
investigates the issue, and at his sole discretion can seek 
guidance from appropriate individuals within the Group, such as 
the Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, as and when 
he deems necessary. 

This report forms part of the Corporate governance report and is 
signed on behalf of the Audit Committee by:

Mark Rolfe 
Chairman of the Audit Committee

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201573

Safety, Health and Environment Committee report
Statement from the Chairman of the Safety,  
Health and Environment Committee

Richard Akers
Safety, Health 
and Environment 
Committee Chairman

“ The SHE Committee was established on 1 July 
2014 to enhance the oversight and stewardship 
of SHE operational performance. Accordingly, it 
has been a busy first year focused on reviewing 
and enhancing the Group’s SHE systems 
and processes.”

a Key achievements in FY15

a Areas for Focus in FY16

 > Agreed and implemented in full its terms 

 > Review longer term impact of the implementation 

of reference;

of the Safety First proactive plan;

 > Agreed and oversaw delivery of a 29 step proactive 
plan to promote ‘Safety First’ including external 
benchmarking, a ‘Five Steps to Safety’ programme 
and mandatory annual SHE visits by all Board 
members to set the tone at the top;

 > Maximum 5 Star status awarded by the British 
Safety Council following an audit of our safety 
management systems; 

 > Development of a consolidated training programme 
for all site based employees, supported by the use 
of electronic forms and e-learning modules; and

 > Stabilising the IIR at 381 for FY15 (FY14: 379). 

 > Ensuring maintenance of a 5 Star system of safety 
audit and review the outcome of a follow up audit 
by the British Safety Council;

 > Monitor and enhance initiatives and processes put 
in place to assist with addressing the Group’s IIR 
and Reportable Injury Incident rates; and

 > Review SHE performance targets and objectives set 
for the business to ensure they remain appropriate.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements74

Governance – Safety, Health and Environment Committee report continued

Membership and attendance at SHE Committee meetings
The Directors who are members of the SHE Committee and their 
attendance at the three scheduled meetings during the year 
are shown in Table 6. Tom Keevil, Group General Counsel and 
Company Secretary, is also a member.

Only members of the SHE Committee have the right to attend 
meetings, however individuals such as the Group SHE Director 
may be invited to attend all or part of any meeting where it is 
deemed appropriate. 

Table 6 

Member

Richard Akers

Steven Boyes

Role

Chairman

Member

Number of meetings attended

3/3

3/3

Note: 
3/ Number of meetings attended whilst a Director. 
/3 Number of meetings whilst a Director. 

The SHE Operations Committee reports directly to 
the SHE Committee with the Group Safety, Health and 
Environmental Director presenting direct reports to these 
Committees and to the Board. The Group SHE Operations 
Committee continues to operate and is responsible for 
implementing and oversight of the overall SHE improvement 
strategy for the Group.

This is the first report for the Safety, Health and Environment 
(‘SHE’) Committee, having been established on 1 July 2014. 
There has been SHE Operations Committee in place for over 
five years, although, last year the Board decided that given the 
continuing increase in unit production, the turnover in sub-
contractors and a consequent increase experienced in our Injury 
Incident Rate (‘IIR’), that it should enhance the oversight and 
stewardship of SHE operational performance. Accordingly, the 
SHE Committee came into effect. Its primary role is to:

 > oversee the Group’s compliance with the SHE 

management system;

 > review any significant SHE risks or exposures and assess ways 

to mitigate against these;

 > establish and maintain policies in respect of all areas relating 
to safety, health and environment such as safety of employees, 
customers, contractors and the general public; and 

 > assess the outcome of annual SHE internal and external audits 

and agree necessary actions with the Group SHE Director.

The SHE Committee has agreed and implemented terms 
of reference which fully set out its duties and how the SHE 
Committee will operate. 

The key achievements of the SHE Committee are set out on 
the previous page together with the areas that it will focus on 
during FY16.

a  SHE Committee terms of reference – 

www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk/investors/corporate-
governance/governance-policies

Richard Akers 
Chairman of the SHE Committee

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201575

Remuneration report
Annual statement from the Chairman of the Remuneration Committee

Richard Akers
Remuneration 
Committee Chairman

“ The remuneration outcomes for FY15 reflect the 
significant improvements made by the Group 
across all operating metrics. They also take 
into account the excellent progress made by the 
Executive Directors and Senior Management in 
delivering the Company’s strategy.” 

a Key achievements in 2015

 > Continuing engagement with shareholders and 

governing bodies in respect of remuneration policy 
with 99% of those voting at the 2014 AGM approving 
our policy;

 > Agreed the fixed and variable remuneration 

for the new Chief Executive and Chief Financial 
Officer Designate;

 > Negotiated a reduced pension supplement for all 

Executive Directors;

 > Agreed retirement arrangements for Mark Clare; 

and 

 > Agreed the simplification of the structure of, and 

the targets for, the bonus scheme for FY16.

a Areas for focus in 2016

 > Medium and long term Senior Management 

retention; 

 > Targets for, and the level of awards of, any LTPP 

grant; and

 > Implementation of matters identified in the 

effectiveness review.

I am pleased to present the Remuneration report for the 
financial year ended 30 June 2015 on behalf of the Remuneration 
Committee. The Remuneration report comprises this statement, 
the Directors’ Remuneration Policy (the ‘Policy’) and the Annual 
report on remuneration. Each of these parts has been prepared 
in accordance with the requirements of the Large and Medium-
sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) 
(Amendments) Regulations 2013 and of the 2012 UK Corporate 
Governance Code (the ‘Code’). No changes are proposed to  
the Policy for FY16 and it will not, therefore, be re-presented  
to shareholders at this year’s AGM. The Annual report on 
remuneration (including this Annual Statement) will, as in 
previous years, be subject to an advisory vote.

The main role of the Committee is to design and implement a 
remuneration framework which is aligned to the interests of 
the shareholders and allows the Group to recruit and retain 
Executive Directors and Senior Management who are fully 
focused, and motivated, to achieve and deliver the key elements 
of the Company’s business strategy. The Committee operates 
within terms of reference (the ‘Terms of Reference’) and 
governance policies approved annually by the Board and in 
accordance with the Code.

a  Remuneration Committee terms of reference – 
www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk/investors/
corporate-governance/governance-policies

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements76

Governance
Remuneration report 
Overview

Below is a summary of the remuneration package for Executive Directors throughout FY15, together with the targets set for variable 
remuneration, our performance against such targets and the resulting remuneration outcomes. Full details can be found in the 
Annual report on remuneration on pages 84 to 95.

FY15 Executive Directors’ Remuneration Package

Fixed element (c.28% of total reward assuming maximum performance)

Salary + Pension + Benefits

Performance-related element (c.72% of total reward assuming maximum performance)

Annual flexible incentive

Long term performance

Annual Bonus
(max 150% of salary)

Bonus in excess of  
100% of salary deferred 
into shares

FY15 Performance Metrics:

Financial Items – 100% 
Profit before tax – 75%
Balance Sheet Items – 25%
Non-Financial Items – 50%

Performance Share Plan
(max 200% of salary)

FY15 Performance Metrics:

Earnings per Share (‘EPS’)– 1/3 
Return on Capital Employed (‘ROCE’)– 1/3
Total Shareholder Return (‘TSR’) – 1/3
Two year continued holding period commencing  
at the end of performance period

Our performance in FY15

Profit before tax (£m)

EPS (pence)

ROCE (%)

Land bank owned (years)

Net cash/(debt) (£m)

Total capital return (pence)3

FY15

565.5

45.5

23.9

3.3

186.5

25.1

FY14

390.6

31.2

19.5

3.4

73.1

10.3

FY13
(restated)1

104.5

14.52

11.5

3.4

(25.9)

2.5

1   The Consolidated Income Statement has been restated following the adoption of IAS 19 (Revised) ‘Employee Benefits’ during FY14. 
2  Adjusted earnings per share before exceptional items. Basic earnings per share 7.7 pence.
3   Includes interim dividend of 4.8 pence per share paid in May 2015 and the proposed final dividend of 10.3 pence per share and special cash payment of 10.0 pence per share for FY15, both of which are subject to 

shareholder approval. 

FY15 Executive Directors’ remuneration outcomes
Annual Bonus:

Performance Metric

Profit before tax

Land commitment

Health & safety

Customer service

Employee engagement

Personal objectives

Total bonus 

LTPP grant in October 2012:

Performance Metric

EPS (pence)

TSR (%)

Total Level of Vesting

1   Rebased as explained on page 86 to 44.5 pence for the purpose of calculating the vesting level.

Potential maximum bonus  
(% of salary)

Bonus achieved  
(% of salary)

75.0

25.0

15.0

15.0

 10.0

10.0

150.0

70.8

25.0

15.0

10.0

10.0

9.0

139.8

Targets

Achievement

Level of Vesting (%)

Minimum 20 
On target 24 
Maximum 28

Median 81.9 
Upper quartile 137.2

45.51

362.9

100

100

100

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015 
 
 
77

Our remuneration strategy
Our strategy is to ensure that Executive Directors’ remuneration 
(and that of Senior Management) is clearly linked to the delivery 
of sustainable shareholder value and that they are appropriately 
rewarded for performance against the Group’s key objectives.

Aims of our remuneration policy:
 > promote the long term success of the Company and be fully 
aligned with the performance and strategic objectives of the 
Group applicable for any financial year; 

 > reward the delivery of profit, the maintenance of an appropriate 
capital structure and the continued improvement of return on 
capital employed by the business whilst ensuring that Executive 
Directors and Senior Management adopt a level of risk which 
is in line with the risk profile of the business as approved by 
the Board; 

 > reflect the interests and expectations of shareholders and 

other stakeholders;

 > attract, retain, motivate and competitively reward Executive 

Directors and Senior Management with the requisite 
experience, skills and ability to support the achievement of 
the Group’s key strategic objectives in any financial year; 

 > take account of pay and employment conditions of employees 

across the Group; and

 > ensure that there is no reward for failure; termination payments 

(if any) are limited to those that the Executive Director (or 
member of Senior Management) is contractually entitled to; and 
in exercising its discretion, the Committee robustly applies the 
‘good’ and ‘bad’ leaver provisions as defined in the rules of each 
of the share schemes operated by the Group.

For full details see page 70 of our 2014 Annual Report 
and Accounts.

Our performance and FY15 remuneration outcomes
As illustrated on page 76, the Group has once again seen 
significant improvements across all operating metrics. Given that 
management has continued to make excellent progress in 
delivering the Company’s strategy whilst maintaining a strong 
position for the future, the Committee has approved the following 
remuneration for Executive Directors in respect of FY15.

Annual bonus

In July 2014, the Committee established a profit before tax target 
level of £530m, with a minimum threshold for the bonus at £510m 
and a maximum threshold of £570m against a market consensus 
of £530m. Performance against each of the annual bonus targets, 
including profit before tax, is set out on page 86. Based on this 
performance, the Committee has approved a bonus award of 
139.8% of base salary (2014: 150%) for Executive Directors. 
The bonus earned in excess of 100% of base salary will be 
deferred into shares for a period of three years and will be subject 
to a continued employment condition.

Long Term Performance Plan
The performance period for the award made on 24 October 
2012 (the ‘2012/13 LTPP’) ended on 30 June 2015. Both the 
total shareholder return and earnings per share performance 
conditions applicable to this award were tested thereafter and 
100% of each element will vest on 24 October 2015. Details of the 
achievement against the specific targets can be found on page 
87. Each participant of the 2012/13 LTPP will therefore receive 
100% of the award granted to them in October 2012. The relevant 
number of shares (following settlement of any tax and national 
insurance liabilities) will be issued to each participant in 
October 2015.

Management changes
Following Mark Clare’s decision to retire from his position as 
Group Chief Executive with effect from 30 June 2015 and as an 
Executive Director as of 31 July 2015, the Committee discussed 
and approved his retirement arrangements. Details can be found 
on page 95. The Committee also considered the structure of the 
remuneration packages for David Thomas and Neil Cooper in 
respect of their appointments to the roles of Chief Executive and 
Chief Financial Officer Designate respectively. Full details are set 
out on pages 93 and 94. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements78

Governance – Remuneration report continued

Remuneration for FY16
Taking into account the continuing improvement in the business 
environment, the Company’s evolving strategy and feedback 
received from shareholders on the Company’s remuneration 
policy, the Committee undertook a detailed review of the 
remuneration for Executive Directors and Senior Management 
in December 2014. The key components of Executive Directors’ 
remuneration for FY16 are summarised below:

Shareholding requirements 
Following feedback from shareholders, the shareholding 
requirements introduced on 1 July 2014 for Executive Directors 
and Senior Management have been further enhanced. 
Executive Directors must now retain a minimum percentage of 
‘owned shares’ and to be classified as a ‘good leaver’ are required 
to hold shares for a period of two years after they leave the 
business. Details can be found on page 93.

Conclusion
Throughout the year, the Committee complied with those 
aspects of the Code relevant to its business. The Committee 
continues to demonstrate its accountability on executive 
remuneration to shareholders through this report and through 
regular dialogue. As in previous years, the Committee engaged 
with key institutional investors and shareholder representative 
bodies in respect of the intended application of the policy for 
Executive Directors and Senior Management for the forthcoming 
year. Feedback from this process and the remuneration 
guidelines and guidance issued by the Investment Association, the 
National Association of Pension Funds and Pensions Investment 
Research Consultants, were taken into account when setting 
Executive Directors’ remuneration. 

I would like to thank all shareholders for their support of our 
remuneration policy to date. I hope that you will continue to 
support the Remuneration report at this year’s AGM by voting 
in favour of the Annual report on remuneration.

Richard Akers  
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee

8 September 2015

Base salaries 
Executive Directors’ salaries, including that of Steven Boyes, have 
been set so as to reflect the change of roles and responsibilities 
in light of the changes in management. See page 92 for 
further details.

Annual bonus
The maximum bonus potential has been maintained at 150% of 
base salary for any bonus earned in respect of FY16. Any bonus 
in excess of 100% will be deferred into shares in the Company for 
a period of three years and subject to a continued employment 
condition. The Committee has however revised the performance 
measures and their weightings by reducing the weighting of profit 
before tax, increasing the weighting of balance sheet items and 
personal objectives and by removing employee engagement. 
This reflects a significant simplification of the annual bonus 
structure for Executive Directors and Senior Management to 
improve its effectiveness as an incentivisation and retention tool. 
Full details of the FY16 bonus performance measures and their 
respective weightings are set out on page 93. 

2015/16 LTPP award
Consistent with the approach taken last year, the Committee 
intends to make awards to Executive Directors and Senior 
Management under the LTPP during FY16 (the ‘2015/16 LTPP’). 
The level of the award to be granted will continue to be no more 
than 200% of base salary for Executive Directors. The award 
will be subject to three performance targets: total shareholder 
return, absolute earnings per share and return on capital 
employed. Each element will represent one-third of the total 
award. The 2015/16 LTPP will also be subject to a two-year 
continued holding period, commencing from the completion of the 
performance period. Further details on the 2015/16 LTPP can be 
found on page 94.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201579

Remuneration report 
Directors’ remuneration policy – summary

The Policy is summarised in the tables below and on pages 81 to 
83. The Policy was approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual 
General Meeting held on 12 November 2014. No changes are 
proposed to the Policy for FY16.

The full version of the Policy can be found on pages 64 to 74  
of the 2014 Annual Report and Accounts which is available  
on our website at www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk/investors/
results-reports-and-presentations/rp-2014. 

A description of how the Company implemented the Policy in FY15 
can be found on pages 84 to 92 and details of how the Policy is 
intended to be applied in FY16 are set out on pages 92 to 95.

Element of pay

Base salary

How operated in practice

Additional information

To help promote the long term success of the Company, 
attract and retain high-calibre Executive Directors 
and reflect the roles and responsibilities of each of the 
Executive Directors.

Salaries are paid monthly in arrears. The aim is to 
provide a competitive salary relative to comparable 
companies in terms of size and complexity.

Normally reviewed annually and fixed for 12 months 
with effect from 1 July. 

See page 92 for Executive Directors’ salaries with effect 
from 1 July 2015.

Benefits (taxable)

To support the health and well-being of Executive 
Directors whilst they undertake their roles.

Benefits include:

 > company car;

Pension

To assist Executive Directors plan for retirement.

Annual bonus

To motivate and reward Executive Directors and Senior 
Management for the achievement of demanding 
financial objectives and key strategic measures over 
the financial year.

 > annual medical screening;

 > private medical insurance;

 > some telephone costs; and 

 > contributions towards obtaining independent 

tax advice.

In accordance with legislation, Executive Directors 
are enrolled into a workplace pension. If Executive 
Directors choose to opt-out of the workplace pension 
they can elect to either: 

 > participate in the Company’s money purchase 

pension plan; or

 > receive a salary supplement.

Executive Directors are also eligible for an insured 
lump sum of up to five times pensionable salary on 
death in service.

Executive Directors are eligible to an annual bonus 
which is discretionary and is not pensionable.

The level of bonus awarded to each Executive Director 
is dependent on the achievement of a number of Group 
and individual performance targets. 

Bonuses up to 100% of base salary are paid in cash. Any 
bonus earned in excess of this (up to a maximum of 50% 
of base salary) is compulsorily deferred into shares 
under the Deferred Bonus Plan (‘DBP’), see below.

Long Term Performance Plan (‘LTPP’)

To motivate and reward Executive Directors and 
Senior Management for the delivery of the long term 
performance of the Group.

To facilitate share ownership by Executive Directors and 
Senior Management.

Executive Directors are eligible to participate in the 
Company’s LTPP. Annual LTPP awards can be equal to 
a maximum of 200% of base salary and are for a period 
of three years with a two-year continued holding period 
attached to the end of the performance period.

The Committee does have the discretion to offer 
other benefits, if it deems appropriate, to secure 
the appointment of a new Executive Director and to 
ensure that the benefits package for existing Executive 
Directors remains competitive in the market.

The defined benefit section of the Group’s pension 
scheme closed to new entrants in 2001 and future 
accrual of defined benefits for current members ceased 
to be offered on 30 June 2009. Steven Boyes remains a 
member of this part of the scheme.

Each of the Executive Directors received a salary 
supplement equal to 30% of their salary for FY15. 

When setting bonus targets, the Committee considers 
the effect of corporate performance on environmental, 
social and governance risks and sustainability issues 
generally to ensure that remuneration structures do not 
inadvertently motivate irresponsible behaviour.

The performance targets set are stretching whilst 
having regard to the nature and risk profile of the 
Company and the interests of its shareholders. 
Performance conditions are based on a mixture of 
financial and non-financial targets.

Performance against FY15 targets can be found on 
page 85.

LTPP awards are usually granted in October each year. 

The Committee sets performance targets for each 
award and ensures that targets, whilst stretching, are: 
realistic and attainable; for the long term benefit of the 
Group; and do not encourage inappropriate business 
risks.

Performance so far against the targets for the awards 
made in FY15 can be found on page 86.

Details of the awards due to be granted in October 2015 
are set out on page 94. These awards will, as in previous 
years, be subject to performance conditions relating to 
EPS, TSR and ROCE.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements80

Governance – Remuneration report – Directors’ remuneration policy – summary continued

Element of pay

Deferred Bonus Plan (‘DBP’)

To encourage long term focus and to further align 
interests of the Executive Directors and Senior 
Management with those of shareholders and 
discourage excessive risk taking.

Executive Share Option Scheme (‘ESOS’)

To encourage or facilitate the holding of shares in the 
Company by or for the benefit of bona fide employees 
and former employees of the Company and its 
subsidiaries.

Savings Related Share Option Scheme  
(‘Sharesave’)

How operated in practice

Additional information

Any annual bonus which is deferred into shares is held 
in this plan for a period of three years and is subject to a 
continued employment condition. 

Deferred shares may be forfeitable if an individual 
leaves prior to the release date. 

Deferred shares do not accrue dividends.

The Committee utilises the rules of the Group’s Co-
Investment Plan (the ‘CIP’) for the purposes of the DBP. 
Under these rules the Committee has a discretion 
which allows it to award matching shares (the ‘Matching 
Award’) should it deem appropriate to do so.

Details of any bonus deferred into shares for FY15 can 
be found on page 85.

No awards can be granted under the ESOS in the same 
financial year as an award is granted under the LTPP. 

The Committee retains the discretion to make future 
awards under the ESOS should market conditions 
dictate that it is more appropriate to grant under the 
ESOS than the LTPP.

The last award, made under the ESOS in December 
2009, vested in December 2012. Executive Directors 
have until 19 December 2019 to exercise their vested 
option, after which time it will lapse. Mark Clare and 
Steven Boyes exercised their ESOS options during the 
year. Details can be found on pages 87 and 88.

To promote long term share ownership amongst all 
employees of the Group in a tax-efficient way, linking 
employee benefits to the performance of the Group  
and to aid retention of staff.

Under the standard terms of the Sharesave, all 
employees with a minimum of six months’ service as 
at the invitation date are eligible to participate in the 
Sharesave.

The three-year Sharesave granted in March 2012 
matured on 1 June 2015. Mark Clare exercised 
his option during the year. Steven Boyes has until 
30 November 2015 to exercise his.

Shareholding requirement

To further align the interests of Executive Directors and 
Senior Management to those of shareholders.

Employees can elect to save between a minimum of £5 
and the maximum monthly savings limit as approved by 
the Committee and the Board, for a period of three or 
five years. At the end of the savings period the employee 
has six months in which to exercise their option.

Steven Boyes was granted an option under the 2015 
Sharesave. Further information can be found on 
page 88.

Executive Directors are required to build and retain a 
shareholding in the Company’s shares within five years 
of being appointed to the Board.

Shareholdings will be valued by reference to the higher 
of the share price paid on acquisition or vesting and 
the share price at the close of business of the London 
Stock Exchange on 30 June annually. The salary will be 
the participant’s salary applicable for the financial year 
under review.  

The Chief Executive and other Executive Directors are 
required to build up and retain a total shareholding in the 
Company’s shares equivalent to 200% and 150% of base 
salary respectively (the ‘Total Shareholding’).

Shares that qualify as ‘Total Shareholdings’  
(included net of income tax except for 
Owned Shareholdings)

 > All ‘Owned Shareholdings’ (see page 93);

 > Shares held under a vested but unexercised option; 

 > Shares held under the Deferred Bonus Plan; and 

 > Vested shares under LTPPs subject to 

ongoing restrictions.

Clawback provisions apply to all short and long term variable remuneration in the event of material misconduct and/or material 
misstatement or error of financial results. For full details see page 83.

Summary of the remuneration policy for Non-Executive Directors

Element of pay

How operated in practice

Additional information

Non-Executive Directors’ fees (including 
the Chairman)

To reflect the time commitment and the skills and 
experience required for the role.

The remuneration of the Chairman and the Non-
Executive Directors is reviewed annually taking into 
account the fees paid by other companies in the 
housebuilding sector. 

Non-Executive Director fees are paid monthly 
in arrears. 

No additional fees are payable for membership of 
Board Committees however, additional fees are paid to 
the Chairmen of the Audit, the Remuneration and the 
Safety, Health and Environmental Committees and  
to the Senior Independent Director. See page 95 for  
full details.

The remuneration of the Non-Executive Directors is set 
by the Board on the recommendation of a Committee 
of Executive Directors and the remuneration of the 
Chairman is set by the Board on the recommendation of 
the Committee. 

Non-Executive Director fees were increased to £56,000 
with effect from 1 July 2015. See page 95 for further 
details.

The Non-Executive Directors do not participate in any 
performance related schemes (e.g. annual bonus or 
incentive schemes) nor do they receive any pension or 
private medical insurance or taxable benefits other 
than the potential to receive gifts at the end of a long-
standing term of appointment and travel/hospitality 
benefits related to their role as Directors.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201581

Executive Directors’ service contracts 
Details of the Executive Directors’ service contracts are included 
in Table 7 and their emoluments are shown in Table 10 on page  
84. The Company’s policy is for all Executive Directors’ (including 
new appointments) service contracts to be for a rolling 12 month 
period which can be terminated by 12 months’ notice given by 
either the Company or by the Executive Director at any time. 
The service contracts entitle Executive Directors to the provision 
of a company car, annual medical screening, private medical 
insurance, some telephone costs and contributions to the cost 
of obtaining independent tax advice. The Committee regularly 
reviews the contractual terms for Executive Directors to ensure 
that they continue to reflect best practice.

All Executive Directors’ appointments and subsequent re-
appointments are subject to election and annual re-election 
by shareholders at the Company’s Annual General Meeting.

Table 8 – Non-Executive Directors’ letters of appointment

Non-Executive Director

Date elected/ re-elected 
at AGM

Date first appointed 
to the Board

Date last re-appointed 
to the Board

Bob Lawson

John Allan2

N/A

1 June 2008

1 June 20141

12 November 2014

1 August 2014

N/A

Tessa Bamford

12 November 2014

1 July 2009

Mark Rolfe

12 November 2014

1 May 2008

Richard Akers

12 November 2014

2 April 2012

1 July 2015

1 May 2014

2 April 2015

Nina Bibby

12 November 2014

3 December 2012

N/A

1   As announced on 11 March 2014, Bob Lawson stepped down from his position as Chairman of the 

Board at the conclusion of the 2014 AGM. His letter of appointment was renewed for the period up to 
and including 12 November 2014.

2   John Allan joined the Board on 1 August 2014 as a Non-Executive Director and Chairman Designate and 
succeeded Bob Lawson as Chairman of the Board with effect from the conclusion of the 2014 AGM.

The letters of appointment for Non-Executive Directors are 
available for inspection by any person at the Company’s registered 
office during normal office hours and on the Company’s website 
at: www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk.

Table 7 – Executive Directors’ service contracts
Executive Director

Service contract date

Date of appointment

Mark Clare1

12 November 2012

2 October 2006

David Thomas

16 January 2013

21 July 2009

Steven Boyes

21 February 2013

1 July 2001

Notice period

12 months

12 months

12 months

1   Mark Clare stepped down from his position as Group Chief Executive on 30 June 2015 and as a 

Director on 31 July 2015.

Executive Directors’ service contracts are available for inspection 
by any person at the Company’s registered office during normal  
office hours and on the Company’s website at: 
www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk. 

Chairman and Non-Executive Directors’ letters of appointment
The Chairman and each of the Non-Executive Directors are 
appointed under terms set out in a letter of appointment. They do 
not have service contracts and their appointments can be 
terminated (by the Board) without compensation for loss of office 
and by giving the appropriate length of notice as prescribed in 
their respective letters of appointment.

The notice period applicable, from either party, for the Chairman 
is three months and for each of the other Non-Executive Directors 
is one month. Under governance policies approved by the Board, 
Non-Executive Directors are appointed for a three-year term and 
usually serve a second three-year term subject to performance 
review and re-election by shareholders. Beyond this a further 
term of up to three years may be served subject to rigorous 
review by the Chairman and the Nomination Committee and 
re-election by shareholders. Details of Non-Executive Directors’ 
letters of appointment can be found in Table 8.

Membership and attendance at Committee meetings
Membership of the Committee and attendance at each of its 
scheduled meetings during the year is set out in Table 9. 

Table 9

Member

Richard Akers

John Allan1

Tessa Bamford

Nina Bibby

Bob Lawson2

Mark Rolfe3

Role

Chairman

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Number of meetings attended

5/5

4/4

5/5

5/5

2/2

4/5

1   John Allan joined the Remuneration Committee on 1 August 2014, when he joined the Board as a Non-

Executive Director and Chairman Designate.

2   Bob Lawson stepped down as Chairman of the Board and from the Committee on 12 November 2014. 
3   Mark Rolfe was unable to attend a meeting due to unavoidable personal circumstances. Mark Rolfe 

reviewed the papers and provided his comments to the Chairman prior to the meeting.

Note: 
5/ Number of meetings attended whilst a Director.
/5 Number of meetings whilst a Director.

The Group General Counsel and Company Secretary, Tom Keevil, 
acts as Secretary to the Committee.

In accordance with Code provision D.2.1, each of the Non-
Executive Directors on the Committee (including John Allan 
at the date of his Board appointment) is considered to be 
independent with no financial interest in the Committee’s 
decisions, other than as shareholders and the fees paid to them. 
Details of their shareholdings and fees can be found on pages 88 
and 95 respectively.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements82

Governance – Remuneration report – Directors’ remuneration policy – summary continued

Recruitment of Executive Directors 
The Committee will determine the remuneration for any new 
Executive Director in accordance with the Policy as set out in 
the Future Policy Table on pages 64 to 69 of the 2014 Annual 
Report and Accounts and will take into consideration each of the 
following elements:

Salary and benefits – the Committee will take into account: 
market data for the scope of the job; remuneration for the 
relevant role; salaries of, and benefits provided, to existing 
Executive Directors; and the new Executive Director’s experience, 
location and current base salary and benefits package. In the 
event an Executive Director is recruited at below market levels, 
their base salary may be re-aligned over a period of time (e.g. 
two to three years) subject to their performance in the role. 
The Committee may also agree to cover relocation costs, if it is 
deemed appropriate.

Pension – Executive Directors will be auto-enrolled from 
the date of recruitment unless they opt-out. If an Executive 
Director chooses to opt–out they may elect to receive a pension 
supplement in cash. The Committee has discretion to determine 
the level of pension supplement to be awarded to each Executive 
Director, up to a maximum of 30% of base salary, having regard 
to the pension supplement given to existing Executive Directors. 
Alternatively, the Executive Director may choose to join the 
defined contribution money purchase pension plan provided they 
meet all of the eligibility criteria. The Executive Director also has 
the option to receive some of their pension entitlement in cash and 
have the remainder contributed to the defined contribution money 
purchase pension plan, provided this does not, in aggregate, 
exceed 30% of base salary.

LTPP – new Executive Directors may be able to participate in the 
LTPP on terms to be considered by the Committee on a case by 
case basis. Any award made to the new Executive Director will 
usually be on the same terms as set out in the Policy. The level of 
the award will be no greater than that made to existing Executive 
Directors and will be pro-rated based on the remaining time span 
of the relevant performance period. 

The Committee may also consider buying out incentive awards 
which an individual would forfeit upon leaving their current 
employer, again this would be reviewed on a case by case basis. 
The Committee would however in all cases seek validation of 
the value of any potential incentive that is being forfeited and 
take into account the proportion of the performance period 
remaining of the award, the type of award (i.e. cash/shares) 
and the performance achieved (or likely to be achieved). 
Replacement share awards, if any, will be capped at the amount 
forfeited and will be subject to the performance conditions 
applicable under the terms of the Company’s Executive Director 
share scheme in operation at the time.

Where an individual is recruited internally to the position of 
Executive Director, the Company will honour any pre-existing 
contractual commitments.

Executive Directors’ policy on payment on loss of office
Historically, there have been no specific provisions for 
compensation on early termination (except for payment in lieu of 
holidays accrued but untaken) or loss of office due to a change 
of ownership of the Company. The Committee also reserves the 
right to make additional payments where such payments are 
made in good faith: (a) in discharge of an existing legal obligation 
(or by way of damages for breach of such an obligation); or 
(b) by way of settlement or compromise of any claim arising in 
connection with the termination of an Executive Director’s office 
or employment. The Committee will apply mitigation against any 
contractual obligations as it deems fair and reasonable and will 
seek legal advice on the Company’s liability to pay compensation. 
It also seeks to reduce the level of any compensation payable and 
takes into account, amongst other factors, the individual’s and the 
Group’s performance; the Director’s obligation to mitigate their 
own loss; and the Director’s length of service when calculating 
termination payments. The Committee reserves the right to 
phase any such payments if it deems that it is appropriate to do 
so. Any amount that the Committee decides to pay an Executive 
Director will be based on the main elements of Executive 
Remuneration namely, base salary, annual bonus (subject to the 
Committee’s discretion), benefits and pension. 

The Committee also takes into account the rules of the annual 
bonus and LTPP Schemes when determining any payments for 
loss of office as follows:

Annual bonus – in terms of the annual bonus, in accordance 
with the provisions contained within the service contracts, 
Executive Directors are not usually entitled to any bonus payment 
(other than in circumstances where they are deemed by the 
Committee as a ‘good leaver’, which includes but is not limited 
to redundancy, retirement, ill-health or disability or any other 
circumstance which the Committee may decide), unless they 
remain employed and are not under notice as at the payment 
date. Any bonus payment for a ‘good leaver’ will be based on the 
individual performance of the Executive Director concerned, as 
well as the Company’s performance during the relevant period. 
Such payment will be pro-rated depending on the proportion of 
the bonus period worked by the relevant individual.

Deferred bonus – for any bonus deferred into shares, if the 
Executive Director is deemed to be a ‘good leaver’ (as defined 
above), he will be entitled to retain the shares subject to settling 
any tax and national insurance liability that may become due on 
release of the shares. In all other cases, the shares will lapse 
immediately on the date that the Executive Director’s employment 
with the Company ends and there is no entitlement to any 
compensation for the loss of the shares.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201583

In the event any Matching Awards have been granted to the 
Executive Director, these will lapse immediately unless the 
individual is leaving for a ‘permitted reason’ (this includes, but 
is not limited to, redundancy, retirement, ill-health or disability). 
If the Executive Director is leaving for a permitted reason, the 
unvested award will become vested and the number of shares 
subject to the award will be pro-rated based on the remaining 
time span of the performance period that have been completed 
and the level of the performance conditions that have been met 
up to that date. 

LTPP – under the rules of the LTPP, unless the Executive Director 
is deemed by the Committee to be a ‘good leaver’ (as previously 
defined) any LTPP awards held by him will lapse on cessation 
of his employment. If he is a ‘good leaver’, the number of shares 
subject to the award will be pro-rated based on the remaining 
time span of the relevant performance period completed by him. 
No shares will, however, be released to the Executive Director, 
until the normal vesting date, being three years from the date 
of grant. During this time the shares will continue to be subject 
to the relevant performance conditions until the end of the 
performance period, at which point the Committee will test the 
performance conditions and determine how much, if any, of the 
remaining shares will vest.

Change of control – the rules of each share scheme operated by 
the Company contain provisions relating to a change of control. 
In the event that a change of control does occur any unvested 
options/awards will become vested on the date of the relevant 
event. However, the number of options/awards that vest will be 
pro-rated depending on the remaining time span of the relevant 
performance period and the level of performance conditions 
achieved during that period. Options/awards which have already 
vested as at the date of the relevant event may still be exercised 
within the prescribed timescales set out in the rules.

Non-Executive directorships 
Subject to Board approval, Executive Directors are permitted to 
accept one Non-Executive directorship outside the Company and 
retain any fees received from such a position. Executive Directors 
are not allowed to take on the Chairmanship of any FTSE 100 
company. Board approval will not be given for any non-executive 
position where such appointment would lead to a material conflict 
of interest or would have an adverse effect on the Director’s ability 
to perform their duties to the Company.

Gifts to Directors on leaving employment
The Committee reserves the discretion to approve gifts to long 
serving Directors who are retiring or who are ‘good leavers’ 
e.g. those leaving office for any reason other than dismissal 
or misconduct. The value of the gift for any one Director shall 
be limited to a maximum of £5,000 and where a tax liability is 
incurred on such a gift the Committee has the discretion to 
approve the payment of such liability on behalf of the Director in 
addition to this maximum limit.

Legacy arrangements
In approving the Policy, authority is given to the Company to 
honour any previously disclosed commitments entered into with 
current or former Directors including, but not limited to, payment 
of pensions or the vesting/exercise of past share awards.

Clawback 
Both the annual bonus (including any deferred bonus and any 
matching element) and the LTPP are subject to the Company’s 
power of clawback (the ‘Clawback’) for a period of two years 
following vesting. The Clawback is applicable in respect of any 
annual bonus paid/deferred and to any share awards granted 
under the LTPP or the ESOS from 30 June 2010 onwards, 
subject in the case of HMRC approved options, to such approval. 
In addition, Clawback will also apply to any awards granted under 
any Senior Management share schemes.

The Clawback can be invoked if: 
a)   it is necessary to restate the Group’s accounts used to 

calculate a participant’s entitlement to bonus or share awards 
in circumstances where the original over-statement has led 
to a bonus being paid/deferred or share awards being granted 
which would not otherwise have been paid or granted; or 

b)   the participant is found guilty of any criminal activity in 

connection with his or her employment and this related to an 
act which led to a bonus being paid/deferred or share awards 
being granted to him or her. 

In such circumstances, the Committee may determine that the 
bonus and/or share award will be retrospectively recalculated. 
If bonus monies have been paid, the participant will be required 
to reimburse the Company for an amount up to the total amount 
of the net bonus paid, less any bonus that the Committee 
determines would have been paid regardless of the event in 
question. If share awards have been granted, the number of 
awards or options granted will be reduced accordingly. If the 
award has vested and shares have been issued to the participant, 
the participant will be required to repay the value of the relevant 
number of shares based on the Company’s closing share price as 
at the date the shares were issued.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements84

Governance 
Remuneration report 
Annual report on remuneration

In this section, we describe how the Policy has been implemented throughout FY15 together with the resulting payments to Directors 
and how the Policy will be applied in FY16. The Annual report on remuneration will be subject to an advisory vote at the 2015 AGM.
a  Directors’ remuneration outcomes for FY15 

Single figure of remuneration
The total remuneration for each of the Directors for the financial year ended 30 June 2015 is as set out in Tables 10 and 11 below:

Table 10 – Executive Directors’ single figure of remuneration (Audited)

Salary  
£000

Benefits1 (taxable) 
£000

Annual Bonus2 

£000

LTPP  
£000

Pension Benefits  
£000

Sharesave Scheme5 

£000

2014/15

2013/14

2014/15

2013/14

2014/15

2013/14

2014/153

2013/144

2014/15

2013/14

2014/15

2013/14

2015  
Total  
£000

2014  
Total  
£000

Mark Clare6

David Thomas

Steven Boyes

Total

701

454

454

681

441

441

1,609

1,563

44

15

30

89

43

15

28

86

980

635

635

1,021

661

661

4,704

3,046

3,046

4,481

2,845

2,720

2,250

2,343

10,796

10,046

210

136

136

482

204

132

132

468

34

–

34

68

–

–

–

–

6,673

4,286

4,335

6,430

4,094

3,982

15,294

14,506

1   Benefits (taxable) include the provision of a company car, annual medical screening, private medical insurance, some telephone costs and contributions towards obtaining independent tax advice.
2   Includes amount deferred for David Thomas and Steven Boyes (see Table 13 on page 85). Mark Clare will receive his entire bonus in cash in accordance with the retirement arrangements agreed.
3   Performance conditions tested after 30 June 2015 and 100% of the award is due to vest in October 2015. The market price of shares has been calculated based on an average market value over the three 

months to 30 June 2015 (£5.6992 per share).

4   Re-calculated using share price of £4.05 per share being the market value of the shares on the vesting date, 20 October 2014, as opposed to the market price of £3.6916 per share calculated based on an 

average market value over the three months to 30 June 2014 as disclosed in last year’s remuneration report. 

5   The Sharesave Scheme, granted in March 2012, was subject to a continued employment condition and matured on 1 June 2015. The value is calculated using a share price of £5.96 per share being the market 

value of a share on the date of maturity.

6   Mark Clare retired from his position as a Director of the Board on 31 July 2015. 

Table 11 – Non-Executive Directors’ single figure of remuneration (Audited)

Bob Lawson1

John Allan2

Richard Akers

Tessa Bamford

Nina Bibby

Mark Rolfe

Total

Fees  
£000

Benefits1 (taxable)  
£000

2014/15 

2013/14

2014/15

2013/14

98

203

63

48

48

63

270

11

–

58

48

48

63

–

–

–

–

–

523

5053

11

–

–

–

–

–

–

43

2015  
Total  
£000

109

203

63

48

48

63

2014 
Total  
£000

270

–

58

48

48

63

534

5093

1   Bob Lawson stepped down from his position as Chairman of the Company at the conclusion of 2014 AGM on 12 November 2014. Benefits (taxable) relates to the value of the gift (£5,000) and the tax payable 

thereon (£6,000 including VAT), presented to Bob by the Board to reflect the significant contribution he made during his period of service. 

2   John Allan joined the Board as a Non-Executive Director on 1 August 2014 with a fee of £48,000 per annum which increased to £300,000 per annum on 12 November 2014 when he took over as Chairman of 

the Company.

3   Includes Director’s fees (£18,000) paid to Rod MacEachrane and the value of the gift vouchers including tax (£4,000) presented to him, by the Board, when he stepped down from his position as a 

Non-Executive Director at the conclusion of the 2013 AGM. The gift vouchers were presented to Rod as a leaving gift by the Board.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201585

Annual bonus
For the year under review, Executive Directors had the potential 
to earn an annual bonus of up to 150% of base salary, 140% is 
based on the attainment of Group performance targets and 10% 
on personal objectives, both of which are linked directly to the 
Group’s strategy. Any bonus earned in excess of 100% of base

Table 12 – Annual bonus (Audited)

salary will be deferred into shares for a period of three years. 
All targets, Group and personal, were agreed at the beginning 
of the financial year. The Group performance targets which 
applied to the bonus for FY15 and the level of bonus achieved 
were as follows:

Strategic objective

Targets

% of salary

Achievement

% of salary

Maximum 
proportion of total 
bonus available

Actual  
performance

Bonus  
achieved

Cash/deferred

Payable in cash  
% of salary

Payable in shares 
% of salary

£565.5m

70.8%

31.0%

39.8%

Bonus target

Profit  
before tax

Increase profitability

Threshold: £510m

Target: £530m

Maximum: £570m

Land 
Commitment

To ensure appropriate 
future land supply

Land bank owned: 3.3 – 3.6 years

Net Debt: Zero

15%

37.5%

75%

6.25%

6.25%

6.25% 

6.25%

5%

5% 

5%

5%

5%

5%

25.0%

25.0%

15.0%

15.0%

10.0%

10.0%

3.3 years

Net cash

28.7% 

16,956

96.0%

0.33% 

5%

5 Star 

50.3%

1,150

Land creditors: <35% of owned land 
bank less net cash

Land approvals:  
15,000 to 17,000 plots

SHE compliance: 94% or above

85% or less: No more than  
0.6% of sites

H&S Committee Discretion: up to 5% 
for pro-activity

HBF/NHBC Star rating: 5 Star

Net Promoter Score: Minimum 50% 

Defects over 28 days: Less than 300

Maximum: 77% and above

10%

78%

10.0%

10.0%

Threshold: 2%

Target: 5 %

Maximum: 10%

10%

Mark Clare 9%

9.0%

9.0%

David Thomas 9%

Steven Boyes 9%

–

–

–

–

–

Health and safety

Customer service

Employee 
engagement1

Personal 
objectives

To create a safe 
environment for 
employees and other 
stakeholders

To increase focus 
on providing a high 
quality service to 
our customers and 
maintain 5 Star status

To attract and retain 
the highest calibre of 
individuals

To focus individuals to 
achieving the Group’s 
strategic objectives

1  Assessed by reference to IBM’s Kenexa survey.

Table 13 – Executive Directors’ deferred bonus

Mark Clare

David Thomas

Steven Boyes

2014/15 Deferred Bonus

2013/14 Deferred Bonus

% of total 
bonus
deferred1

Amount 
deferred 
£000

Number of
Shares2

% of total 
bonus
deferred1

Amount 
deferred 
£000

Number of
Shares2

–

39.8

39.8

–

181

181

–

TBC3

TBC3

50

50

50

340

220

220

88,160

57,091

57,091

1   The Executive Directors earned a total bonus of 150% and 139.8% of base salary for FY14 and FY15 respectively. The bonus earned in excess of 100% of base salary will be deferred into shares.  

Mark Clare will receive all of his bonus in cash in accordance with his retirement arrangements.

2   Shares are held in the CIP for a period of three years commencing from the date of the award and subject to a continued employment condition.
3   The number of shares will be determined based on the share price calculated by averaging the closing middle-market quotations, as derived from the Daily Official List of the London Stock Exchange, for the 
first five dealing days following the date on which the Group announces its FY15 annual results. The actual number of shares awarded in respect of the FY15 deferred bonus was not therefore available as at 
the date of this report and will be disclosed in next year’s report. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements86

Governance – Remuneration report – Annual report on remuneration continued

 Long Term Performance Plans
Vesting of 2012/13 LTPP (included in 2014/15 Single Figure) (Audited)
The 2012/13 LTPP award granted on 24 October 2012 was based on performance to the year ended 30 June 2015 and will vest on 
24 October 2015. The performance conditions for this award and the resulting vesting level is as follows:

Metric

EPS

TSR

Performance condition

Absolute EPS growth for the financial year ended 30 June 2015.

Threshold target

Stretch target 

20p1

28p1

Actual

Basic

TSR against the constituents of the FTSE 250 index (excluding investment 
trusts). 25% of this element vests for median performance and 100% of this 
element vests for upper quartile performance or above. TSR measured over 
three financial years with a three month average at the start and end of the 
performance period.

Median ranking 
of 94.5 (TSR of 
81.9%)

Upper quartile 
of 47.5 (TSR of 
137.2%)

EPS 45.5p2

Rank of 2 (TSR of 
362.9%)

Total vesting

% Vesting

1002

100

100

1   Following the Company’s refinancing during FY13, the Committee informed each participant of the 2012/13 LTPP that it would be adjusting the vesting levels, at the end of the plan period, 30 June 2015, 

to ensure that participants did not benefit from the expected positive impact upon EPS arising from the refinancing for the relevant parts of those plan periods. Accordingly, the EPS threshold and stretch 
targets were increased by 2 pence each from 18 pence and 26 pence respectively.

2   The actual earnings per share of 45.5 pence has been rebased using the corporation tax rate applicable at the date on which the 2012/13 LTPP targets were set, as the subsequent reduction to the rate of 

corporation tax was not performance related. The actual earnings per share has also been rebased using the same number of shares in issue as used in the 2012/13 LTPP targets. The rebased earnings per 
share used for the purpose of determining vesting, which is directly comparable to the 2012/13 LTPP targets, was 44.5 pence.

The Committee considered the underlying financial performance of the Group and was satisfied that given the continued 
improvement in the Group’s financial results as illustrated on page 76, the above level of vesting of the 2012/13 LTPP was justified. 
Accordingly, the award details for each of the Executive Directors are as follows:

Executive Director

Mark Clare

David Thomas

Steven Boyes

Number of  
shares at grant

Number of
shares to vest1

Number of  
shares to lapse

Dividends on  
shares to vest 

825,357
534,493
534,493

825,357
534,493
534,493

0

0
0

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total

825,357
534,493
534,493

1  The relevant number of shares will be released to each participant as soon as is practicable in October 2015, following the vesting date. 
2  The estimated value of the vested shares is based on the average share price during the three months to 30 June 2015 (£5.6992 per share).

Estimated
value2 
(£000)

4,704
3,046
3,046

LTPP granted during the year (the ‘2014/15 LTPP’) (Audited)
On 20 October 2014, the following 2014/15 LTPP awards were granted to Executive Directors:

Executive Director 

Type of award

Basis of award granted

Mark Clare

Nil cost option

David Thomas

Nil cost option

Steven Boyes

Nil cost option

200% of salary 
£701,018

200% of salary 
£454,000

200% of salary 
£454,000

Share price at date 
of grant (pence)

Number of shares 
over which award 
was granted

Face value of award 
(£000)

% of face value that 
would vest at 
threshold performance

Vesting determined by 
performance over

372.00

372.00

372.00

376,891

244,086

244,086

1,402

908

908

25

25

25

Three  
financial  
years to  
30 June  
2017

The 2014/15 LTPP is subject to three performance conditions, one-third TSR, one-third EPS and one-third ROCE. The levels of 
vesting against TSR are measured over a three-year period commencing 1 July 2014, and against EPS and ROCE for the financial 
year ending 30 June 2017. Given the commercial sensitivity of the EPS and ROCE targets to the Group’s future strategy, the 
Committee agreed that it would not publish these targets prospectively but would set out performance against the targets on an 
annual basis. Accordingly, if the performance period of the 2014/15 LTPP was for one year, commencing 1 July 2014 and the award 
had vested on 30 June 2015, the level of vesting would be as follows:

Performance target

Performance as at 30 June 2015

Level of vesting had the award vested as at 30 June 2015

TSR

EPS

ROCE

Total

59.1% (Upper quartile)

45.5 pence

23.9%

33.3%

–

13.3%

46.6%

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201587

Statement of Directors’ shareholding and share interests (Audited)
For the financial year ended 30 June 2015 Executive Directors were required to hold shares in the Company equivalent in value to 200% 
for the Chief Executive and 150% for the other Directors. As at 30 June 2015, all of the Executive Directors had met the shareholding 
requirement (see Table 15 on page 88).

The interests of the Directors serving during the financial year and their connected persons in the ordinary share capital of the 
Company at the beginning and end of the year are shown in Table 15 on page 88. No notification has been received of any change in the 
interests below during the period 30 June 2015 to 8 September 2015 inclusive, with the exception of the shares to be deferred in respect 
of the bonus earned in excess of 100% of base salary by Executive Directors for the financial year ended 30 June 2015 as described on 
page 85.

Table 14 – Executive Directors’ conditional awards and share options (Audited)
Details of the conditional awards and share options over shares held by the Executive Directors who served during the year are 
as follows:

Date of grant

Unvested 
shares 
(number)

Vested 
shares 
(number)

Granted 
(number)

Exercised 
(number)

Lapsed 
(number)

Outstanding 
shares as at 
30/06/15 
(number)

Market price 
on award 
(pence)

Exercise 
price  
(pence)

Market price 
at exercise/
vesting 
(pence)

Gain 
receivable 
(£000) 

Date from 
which 
exercisable/
capable of
vesting1

Expiry  
Date

Mark Clare

Conditional share options

ESOS2

Sharesave

10.12.2009

28.03.2012

–

–

340,456

7,200

Conditional awards

20.10.2011

–

1,154,786

12.10.2012

184,123

24.10.2012

825,357

02.10.2013

101,560

23.10.2013

418,830

09.10.2014

20.10.2014

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

David Thomas

Conditional share options

ESOS2

ESOS2

Sharesave

Sharesave

10.12.2009

10.12.2009

27.03.2013

30.04.2014

–

–

8,350

208,056

4,398

4,297

–

–

Conditional awards

LTPP3

DBP

LTPP4

DBP

LTPP5

DBP

LTPP6

Total

LTPP3

DBP

LTPP4

DBP

LTPP5

DBP

LTPP6

Total

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

57,091

244,086

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

88,160

376,891

(340,456)

(7,200)

–

–

(1,106,401)

(48,385)

–

–

–

–

–

83.47

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

184,123

170.14

825,357

160.90

101,560

326.90

418,830

325.00

88,160

386.00

376,891

372.00

121.39

527.00

1,381 10.12.2012 09.12.2019

125.00

595.39

34 01.06.2015 30.11.2015

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

408.80

4,523 20.10.2014

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

– 12.10.2015

– 24.10.2015

– 02.10.2016

– 23.10.2016

– 09.10.2017

– 20.10.2017

5,938

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

1,529,870 1,502,442

465,051 (1,454,057)

(48,385) 1,994,921

–

Date of grant

Unvested 
shares 
(number)

Vested 
shares 
(number)

Granted 
(number)

Exercised 
(number)

Lapsed 
(number)

Outstanding 
shares as at 
30/06/15 
(number)

Market price 
on award 
(pence)

Exercise 
price 
(pence)

Market price 
at exercise/
vesting 
(pence)

Gain 
receivable 
(£000) 

Date from 
which 
exercisable/
capable of 
vesting1

Expiry  
Date

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

8,350

208,056

4,398

4,297

–

–

–

–

117.84

121.39

204.60

349.00

–

–

–

–

– 10.12.2012 09.12.2019

– 10.12.2012 09.12.2019

– 01.06.2016 30.11.2016

– 01.07.2019 31.12.2019

20.10.2011

–

733,198

12.10.2012

116,903

24.10.2012

534,493

02.10.2013

65,769

23.10.2013

271,230

09.10.2014

20.10.2014

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

(702,477)

(30,721)

–

83.47

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

116,903

170.14

534,493

160.90

65,769

326.90

271,230

325.00

57,091

386.00

244,086

372.00

997,090

949,604

301,177

(702,477)

(30,721) 1,514,673

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

408.80

2,872 20.10.2014

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

– 12.10.2015

– 24.10.2015

– 02.10.2016

– 23.10.2016

– 09.10.2017

– 20.10.2017

2,872

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements88

Governance – Remuneration report – Annual report on remuneration continued

Table 14 – Executive Directors’ conditional awards and share options (Audited) (continued)

Date of grant

Unvested 
shares 
(number)

Vested 
shares 
(number)

Granted 
(number)

Exercised 
(number)

Lapsed 
(number)

Outstanding 
shares as at 
30/06/15 
(number)

Market price 
on award 
(pence)

Exercise 
price  
(pence)

Market price 
at exercise/
vesting 
(pence)

Gain 
receivable 
(£000) 

Date from 
which 
exercisable/ 
capable of
vesting1

Expiry  
date

Steven Boyes

Conditional share options

ESOS2

Sharesave

Sharesave

Sharesave

Conditional awards

LTPP3

DBP

LTPP4

DBP

LTPP5

DBP

LTPP6

Total

10.12.2009

28.03.2012

–

–

189,142

7,200

30.04.2014

2,578

29.04.2015

–

20.10.2011

700,851

12.10.2012

111,746

24.10.2012

534,493

02.10.2013

65,769

23.10.2013

271,230

09.10.2014

20.10.2014

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

2,013

(189,142)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

7,200

2,578

2,013

–

–

–

–

121.39

527.00

767 10.12.2012 09.12.2019

125.00

349.00

447.00

–

–

–

– 01.06.2015 30.11.2015

– 01.07.2017 31.12.2017

– 01.07.2018 31.12.2018

–

–

–

–

–

57,091

244,086

(671,485)

(29,366)

–

83.47

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

111,746

170.14

534,493

160.90

65,769

326.90

271,230

325.00

57,091

386.00

244,086

372.00

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

408.80

2,745 20.10.2014

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

– 12.10.2015

– 24.10.2015

– 02.10.2016

– 23.10.2016

– 09.10.2017

– 20.10.2017

3,512

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

1,686,667

196,342

303,190

(860,627)

(29,366) 1,296,206

–

1   The earliest date on which an award may vest, in normal circumstances, having fulfilled all qualifying conditions, after which ordinary shares are transferred automatically to the participants as soon as possible.
2   The ESOS is divided into two sub-schemes, one of which is approved under the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 and the other of which is not. The exercise price is calculated differently for each sub-

scheme in accordance with the rules of the ESOS. Executive Directors have until 9 December 2019 to exercise their options under the ESOS.

3   95.81% of this award vested on 20 October 2014. The relevant number of shares were released to each participant thereafter following the settlement of any tax and national insurance liabilities due on the shares.
4    This award was tested after 30 June 2015 and 100% of the award will vest in October 2015 (see page 86 for further details).
5    Award based on an allocation of ordinary shares equivalent in value to a maximum of 200% of base salary. Half of the award is subject to a three-year TSR performance condition (100% vesting for upper quartile, 

25% for median and no vesting below median) and the other half is based on the achievement of an EPS target for the financial year ending 30 June 2016 (100% vesting at 40 pence or higher; 25% at 30 pence and no 
vesting for below 30 pence). There is no re-testing of performance conditions.

6    See page 86 for details.

All conditional awards and share options are subject to an overriding Committee discretion, in that the Committee must be 
satisfied that the underlying financial performance of the Group over the performance period warrants the level of vesting as 
determined by applying the relevant targets. If the Committee is not of this view, it has the authority to reduce the level of vesting 
as it deems appropriate.

Table 15 – Directors’ interests in shares (Audited)

Beneficially owned 
as at 1 July 2014

Beneficially owned 
as at 30 June 2015

Mark Clare

David Thomas

Steven Boyes

John Allan

Richard Akers

Tessa Bamford

Nina Bibby

Mark Rolfe

1,618,292

559,761

622,863

3,1021

40,000

31,784

8,500

70,149

311,103

931,577

478,275

3,102

40,000

32,542

8,500

71,821

Outstanding share 
awards under  
all employee share  
plans as at 30 June 2015

1,994,921

1,514,673

1,296,206

–

–

–

–

–

Owned Shareholding  
as a % of salary as at 
30 June 20152

Owned Shareholding 
requirement met  
(Y/N)

Total Shareholding  
as a % of salary as at 
30 June 20152 

Total Shareholding 
requirement met  
(Y/N)

273%

1,261%

647%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Y

Y

Y

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

446%

1,726%

825%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Y

Y

Y

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1   Figure as at 1 August 2014, being the date John Allan was appointed as a Non-Executive Director and Chairman Designate of the Company.
2   Calculated in accordance with the Group’s Remuneration Policy. Details of which shares are included in the calculation can be found on pages 82 and 93.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201589

Dilution 
On maturity or vesting of any of its share incentive schemes the 
Company satisfies the awards through: a new issue of shares; 
market purchases; or the Employee Benefit Trust (the ‘EBT’). 
During the financial year ended 30 June 2015, the Company 
continued to satisfy all outstanding Executive options and awards 
under the LTPP, 2009/10 ESOS, the DBP and the Sharesave 
through a new issue of shares, subject to the dilution limits 
described below. Awards made to individuals below Senior 
Management level continued to be satisfied through shares 
currently held, or to be purchased in the market, by the EBT. 

The Company regularly monitors the number of shares issued 
under its schemes and the impact on dilution limits. The Company 
is satisfied that as at 30 June 2015 its usage of shares is compliant 
with the relevant dilution limits set by the Investment Association 
in respect of all share plans (10% of the Company’s issued share 
capital in any rolling ten-year period) and discretionary share 
plans (5% of the Company’s issued share capital in any rolling ten-
year period). In the event that the outstanding options under each 
of the schemes to be satisfied through a new issue of shares were 
to vest and had been exercised on 30 June 2015, the resulting 
issue of new shares would represent 2.5% of the Company’s 
issued share capital as at that date. 

Executive Directors’ pension arrangements 
The Company’s pension policy for Executive Directors is that 
on joining the Group they will be auto-enrolled unless they 
choose to opt-out. Upon opting-out, the Executive Director may 
choose to receive a cash supplement (which does not count for 
incentive purposes) and/or participate in the Company’s defined 
contribution money purchase pension plan. Each of the Executive 
Directors has opted to receive a cash supplement in lieu of 
pension, which for FY15 was equal to 30% of base salary (reducing 
to 25% for FY16). Only the base salary element of a Director’s 
remuneration is pensionable.

Defined benefit section
Steven Boyes was a deferred member of the defined benefit 
section of the Barratt Group Pension and Life Assurance Scheme 
(the ‘Scheme’) during the year ended 30 June 2015.

The Scheme was closed to new entrants in 2001 and on 30 June 
2009, the Company exercised its consent under the rules of the 
Scheme and agreed to cease offering future accrual of defined 
benefits for current members. Members of the Scheme became 
eligible to join the defined contribution money purchase section  
of the Scheme with effect from 1 July 2009.

Up until 30 June 2009, Steven Boyes was an active member of 
the defined benefit section of the Scheme. This entitlement was 
based on a 1/60 accrual rate and a normal retirement age of 65. 
Since 1 July 2009, Steven Boyes has been entitled to receive a 
cash supplement equal to 30% (25% from 1 July 2015) of his base 
salary per annum.

The last full actuarial valuation of the Scheme as at 30 November 
2013 showed a deficit of £34.8m calculated on the basis of the 
Scheme’s technical provisions. The Company and the Trustees 
of the Scheme have agreed a plan to address the shortfall which 
requires the Company to continue to make deficit reduction 
payments of £13.3m per annum until 30 November 2015, followed 
by payments of £9.5m per annum from 1 December 2015 until 
31 December 2016. The Company will discuss the funding 
requirements of the Scheme with the Trustees if any material 
change in the Group’s financial circumstances is anticipated. 
The valuation for the Financial Statements was updated to 30 June 
2015 by a qualified independent actuary and a surplus of £5.3m 
(2014: surplus of £3.1m) is included in the Group Balance Sheet as 
shown in note 28 of the Financial Statements. 

Members of the Scheme are also eligible for an insured lump 
sum of up to five times pensionable salary on death in service. 
Current employees who were members of the defined benefit 
section of the Scheme at closure also retain their dependants’ 
pension entitlements. 

No excess retirement benefits have been paid to or are receivable 
by current and/or past directors in respect of their qualifying 
services during the financial year and there are no arrangements 
in place that guarantee pensions with limited or no abatement on 
severance or early retirement.

Payments to Directors leaving the Group (Audited)
The Board made a gross payment of £11,000 to Bob Lawson as a 
retirement gift. Further details can be found on page 84.)

No payments were made in respect of loss of office during  
the year ended 30 June 2015 (30 June 2014: £nil).

Six-year Group Chief Executive’s pay
Table 16 sets out: (i) the total pay, calculated in line with the single 
figure methodology; (ii) the annual bonus pay out as a percentage 
of maximum; and (iii) the long term incentive (‘LTI’) vesting level 
for Mark Clare, Group Chief Executive over a six-year period:

Table 16 – Six-year Group Chief Executive’s pay (Audited)

2010

1,417

2011

1,220

2012

2,099

2013

4,310

2014

6,430

2015

6,673

Six years to 30 June 2015

90.2

36.6

99.2

100.0

100.0

93.2 

Group Chief Executive’s 
total pay (£000)

Bonus outturn  
(as percentage of 
maximum opportunity)

LTI vesting percentage

0.0

0.0

32.8

73.9

95.8

100.0

Total Shareholder Return performance graph
Chart 1, prepared in accordance with the BIS Regulations, shows 
the TSR performance over the last six years against the FTSE 250 
(excluding investment trusts) and against an unweighted index of 
listed housebuilders. The Board has chosen these comparative 
indices as the Group and its major competitors are constituents of 
one or both of these indices. The TSR has been calculated using a 
fair method in accordance with the BIS Regulations.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements90

Governance – Remuneration report – Annual report on remuneration continued

Chart 1 : Total Shareholder Return 

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

30 June
2009

30 June
2010

30 June
2011

30 June
2012

30 June
2013

30 June
2014

30 June
2015

Barratt Developments

FTSE 250 Index (excluding Investment Trusts)

 Index of listed house builders

This graph shows the value by 30 June 2015 of £100 invested in Barratt Developments PLC on 30 June 2009 compared with the value of £100 invested in the FTSE 250 (excluding investment trusts). 
As a supplementary source of information, we also show performance against an index of currently listed housebuilders (excluding Barratt Developments PLC and Crest Nicholson, who re-listed 
in February 2013). The other points plotted are the values at intervening financial year-ends.

Source: Datastream

Percentage change in remuneration of Group Chief Executive
compared to employees
The table below shows the percentage change in salary, 
benefits and annual bonus earned by the Group Chief Executive 
between the financial years ended 30 June 2014 and 30 June 
2015, compared to that of the total wage bill for all employees of 
the Group.

Table 17 – Percentage change in remuneration

Group Chief Executive

All employees (excluding Chief Executive)1

Salary

Benefits

Annual 
bonus

% change % change % change

3.0

3.1

2.3

 6.3

-4.0

-4.0

1    All employees and Executive Directors, excluding the Chief Executive, who were continuously 

employed by the Group between 1 July 2014 and 30 June 2015, excluding promotions.

Relative importance of spend on pay
The following table shows the Company’s actual spend on pay (for 
all employees) relative to dividends and profit from operations:

Table 18 – Relative importance of spend on pay

Staff costs (including Executive Directors) (£m)

Profit from operations (£m)1

Total capital return (£m)2

2015

353.0

576.8

249.8

2014 % change

308.6

409.8

101.1

 14.4

40.8

147.1

1   Profit from operations has been chosen as a metric to compare against as it shows how spend on pay 

is linked to the Group’s operating performance.

2   Includes interim dividend of 4.8 pence per share paid on 20 May 2015 to those shareholders on the 
register as at the close of business on 24 April 2015 and a final dividend of 10.3 pence per share and 
a special cash payment of 10.0 pence per share, value of which has been calculated on the number 
of shares in issue (excluding those held by the EBT) as at 30 June 2015. The final dividend and special 
cash payment, if approved by shareholders at the 2015 AGM, will be paid on 20 November 2015 to 
those shareholders on the register at the close of business on 30 October 2015.

Non-Executive directorships
During the year, Mark Clare received a total fee of £72,351 in 
respect of his positions as the Senior Independent Director and 
a Non-Executive Director of United Utilities Group PLC. He has 
retained this fee in full. Mark Clare is also a trustee of the BRE 
Trust and UK GBC Limited, a member of the Government’s 
Construction Leadership Council and he also sits on the CBI 
Construction Council. Mark Clare does not receive any fees for 
these positions. The time commitment (excluding travelling and 
pre-reading time) expected, in aggregate, for these positions is 
approximately 100 hours per annum. Neither David Thomas nor 
Steven Boyes held any Non-Executive directorships with other 
companies during the year.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201591

Main activities undertaken during FY15 

Committee effectiveness

>  Reviewed and made progress against 

all matters arising from the 2014 annual 
evaluation. 

>  Undertook an internal evaluation of its 

own performance.

>  Assessed the effectiveness of the 

Committee’s remuneration consultants 
and approved their re-appointment 
for FY15.

>  Reviewed and devised an action plan to 

address the issues arising from the 2015 
annual evaluation.

See Governance section on page 58 

Governance

>  Undertook a remuneration risk workshop.

>  Considered and approved the 
Remuneration report for FY14.

>  Received updates on remuneration 

disclosure requirements for the Annual 
Report and Accounts for FY15.

>  Assessed the robustness of the ‘good 

leaver’ provisions for all variable 
remuneration elements.

>  Reviewed and approved the proposed 
approach for the Remuneration report 
for FY15.

>  Identified future training requirements 

for Committee members.

>  Reviewed and approved its annual agenda 

and terms of reference.

Executive Directors’ and 
Senior Management remuneration

>  Considered and approved a remuneration package for 
David Thomas on his appointment as Chief Executive.

>  Agreed the fixed and variable remuneration for the 
new Chief Financial Officer Designate, Neil Cooper.

>  Discussed and approved retirement arrangements 

for Mark Clare.

>  Reviewed annual performance of the Chief Executive 

Annual bonus

and Executive Directors.

>  Reviewed fixed and variable remuneration for 

Senior Management.

>  Approved Senior Management salary increases 

for FY16.

>  Introduced a minimum shareholding requirement 
for Senior Management and a post-employment 
shareholding requirement for Executive Directors.

More information available on pages 92 to 94

>  Formally confirmed bonus outcomes 

for FY14.

>  Considered and approved bonus targets 

for FY15.

>  Reviewed and approved proposals to 

simplify the FY16 bonus scheme.

>  Assessed potential bonus outcomes 

for FY15

More information available on pages 86 
and 94

Long term incentives

>  Received updates on the potential levels 
of vesting of outstanding LTPP awards.

>  Considered and finalised performance 

targets, participants and level of awards 
for FY15 LTPP.

>  Reviewed the potential structure for the 

FY16 LTPP.

>  Assessed the impact of amending the 
TSR comparator group and approved 
the proposed change.

>  Discussed and approved proposed 

membership of the Senior Management 
long term incentive schemes. 

More information available on pages 87 
and 94

Remuneration 
Committee 
activity 2015

Shareholder consultation

>  Reviewed and approved letter to shareholders in 
respect of remuneration outcomes for FY14 and 
proposed policy for FY15.

>  The Committee Chairman held conference calls 
with shareholders to discuss the remuneration 
outcomes and the policy in more detail.

>  Considered feedback received from the 

consultation process in finalising the Group’s 
remuneration policy.

>  Reviewed the effectiveness of the shareholder 

consultation process.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements92

Governance – Remuneration report – Annual report on remuneration continued

Advice/advisers 
In carrying out its principal responsibilities, the Committee 
has the authority to obtain the advice of external independent 
remuneration consultants and is solely responsible for their 
appointment, retention and termination. During the year, the 
Committee has taken advice from independent advisers, 
New Bridge Street (‘NBS’), a part of Aon plc. NBS was initially 
appointed by the Committee as its remuneration consultant in 
2008 and is a founder signatory to the Remuneration Consultants 
Group’s Code of Conduct. In addition to advising the Committee, 
NBS also provided the Company with advice on implementing 
decisions made by the Committee and remuneration 
benchmarking. NBS’s fees for providing such advice amounted 
to £54,344 (2014: £26,716) for the year ended 30 June 2015. 
In line with best practice, the Committee assesses, from time 
to time, whether the appointment remains appropriate or if it 
should be put out to tender as part of its effectiveness review. 
NBS’s appointment was reconfirmed by the Committee in June 
2015 after an annual review of the quality of the advice received 
and fees charged. The Committee is comfortable that the NBS 
engagement partner and team, which provide remuneration 
advice to the Committee, do not have any connections with the 
Company that may impair their independence or objectivity. 
The Committee reviewed the potential for conflicts of interest 
and judged that there were appropriate safeguards against 
such conflicts.

Aon plc also provided broking services to the Company in respect 
of private medical insurance, Death in Service benefits and Group 
Income Protection.

In addition, Slaughter and May, the Company’s corporate legal 
advisers, have also provided advice to the Committee as and 
when necessary.

The Committee also receives input into its decision-making from 
the Chief Executive, the Group General Counsel and Company 
Secretary and the Group Human Resources Director, none of 
whom were present at any time when their own remuneration 
was being considered.

a  Statement of implementation of the 

Policy for FY16

Executive Directors’ remuneration for FY16 will be based on the 
Group’s remuneration strategy as set out on page 77 and will be 
implemented in accordance with the Policy as follows:

Base salary
With effect from 1 July 2015, David Thomas took over as Chief 
Executive from Mark Clare. Accordingly, to reflect the change 
in role, his salary was increased to £676,000 per annum. 
In addition, Steven Boyes’ annual salary was increased to 
£535,000 commencing 1 July 2015 to reflect the additional 
responsibilities that he has assumed. These include, but are not 
limited to, responsibility for the Group’s commercial business, 
Wilson Bowden Developments, health and safety and insurance. 
The latter two are as a consequence of Tom Keevil notifying the 
Board of his intention to retire from the Company in January 2016. 
No salary increase was awarded to Mark Clare, who stepped 
down from the Board on 31 July 2015 but remains employed by 
the Group up until 31 October 2015, to ensure an orderly handover. 
Following these increases, Executive Directors’ salaries 
remain appropriately within the range for the housebuilding 
sector and the wider population of similar sized companies. 
Executive Director salaries, with effect from 1 July 2015, 
are therefore as follows:

Table 19 – Executive Directors’ salary increases

Executive Director

Mark Clare

David Thomas

Steven Boyes

Salary with 
effect from  
1 July 2014  
£000 

Salary with 
effect from  
1 July 2015  
£000

701

454

454

701

676

535

Pension
Each of the Executive Directors has opted to receive a cash salary 
supplement in lieu of a pension. The Executive Board changes 
provided the Committee with the opportunity to adjust the cash 
salary supplement for FY16 from 30% to 25%, which is in line with 
current market practice.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201593

Executive Directors’ shareholding requirement 
The Executive Directors’ shareholding requirement has been enhanced so that in addition to the Total Shareholding described on page 
80, the Chief Executive and other Executive Directors must also hold a minimum ‘owned’ level of shareholding (‘Owned Shareholdings’) 
as part of their Total Shareholdings. The Chief Executive must have an Owned Shareholding of 67% of salary and the other Executive 
Directors, 50% of salary.

The Chief Executive and other Executive Directors will be expected to reach these levels of holding no later than the fifth anniversary of 
them joining the Board, with progress being made throughout the period. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, that will need to 
be agreed by the Committee, they will not be allowed to sell shares unless they reach the levels specified. 

Shares that qualify as ‘Owned Shareholdings’
 > Shares held directly;

 > Shares held by a spouse, partner or children under 18;

 > Shares held in an ISA or PEP; and 

 > Shares held in a pension or trust arrangement.

All participants who have not built up the required level of ‘Owned and Total Shareholdings’ by the end of the defined period, will not be 
eligible for inclusion in future share-based incentive schemes, unless there are exceptional circumstances, which would need to be 
approved by the Remuneration Committee. 

To be classified as a ‘good leaver’ from the Company, the Chief Executive and the other Executive Directors, will be required to commit 
to continue retaining a Total Shareholding of 100% and 75% respectively of the value of their final salary, in the Company’s shares for 
two years post their leaving date. 

Annual bonus
Executive Directors and Senior Management will participate in the Group’s annual bonus scheme in accordance with the Policy. 
The performance measures, the reasons for selecting these measures and the maximum bonus payment against each of them 
expressed as a percentage of salary for FY16 will be:

Performance measure

Financial:

Profit before tax 

Balance Sheet Items:

Reason for selecting

Weighting 
(% of salary maximum)

Rewards outperformance against stretching targets and is a key measure of our performance.

Land bank owned and controlled

Ensures sufficient land available for the future business plan.

Capital employed

Non-financial:

Health and safety

Customer service

Personal objectives

Total

Ensures efficient and effective management of our Balance Sheet.

Promotes working towards an ever safer working environment. 

Critical to the Group’s brands and competitive resilience in all market conditions. 

Focus individuals on specific factors required to meet the long and short term strategy of the business 
whilst aligning their interests with those of shareholders.

60

22.5

22.5

15

15

15

150*

* 

 Any bonus earned in aggregate in excess of 100% will continue to be deferred into shares and held in the CIP. The Committee has agreed that no matching shares will be awarded against any deferred shares 
in respect of FY16.

The individual targets for each performance measure are commercially sensitive and therefore not disclosed in this year’s report. 
We will, however, provide full disclosure on the targets and performance against them in next year’s Annual report on remuneration.

The Group’s profitability remains a key measure, however, in order to drive sustainable value this must be achieved through an 
appropriate capital structure and in line with the risk profile of the business. The annual bonus performance measures have been 
reviewed against last year’s and the following changes have been made to align them with the Company’s strategy: 

 > the weighting of profit before tax has been reduced to give it a more appropriate focus relative to other measures; and 

 > the introduction of capital employed to further align the interests of Executive Directors with those of shareholders.

The Committee will continue to have an overriding discretion in respect of any bonus payment in accordance with its Remuneration 
Policy. In addition, any bonus awarded for FY16 will be subject to Clawback (see page 83).

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements94

Governance – Remuneration report – Annual report on remuneration continued

LTPP
The level of the LTPP award to be granted to Executive Directors and Senior Management during FY16 will be in line with that set out 
in the Policy. The Committee is cognisant that such an award should be subject to performance targets which are stretching and 
challenging whilst aligned with the short and long term performance of the Group and total shareholder return. Accordingly, the 
Committee has agreed that the extent to which the LTPP award to be granted in FY16 (the ‘2015/16 LTPP’) will vest, will be dependent 
on three independent performance conditions as follows:

Performance condition

Reason selected

 > TSR against a 50+/50- comparator 
group as at the beginning of the 
performance period.

To ensure that the comparator group 
remains current whilst factoring in the 
continued movement in the Company’s 
market capitalisation.

Weighting  
(of total award)

One-third

Below Threshold  
(0% vesting)

Below median

Threshold  
(25% vesting)

Median 

Maximum  
(100% vesting)

Upper quartile

 > Absolute EPS for the  
financial year ending  
30 June 2018

 > ROCE 

To ensure efficient and effective 
management of our business and align 
interests with those of shareholders.

To ensure efficient and effective 
management of our business  
and align interests with those  
of shareholders.

One-third

See below

One-third

See below

EPS and ROCE performance targets
As per last year, the specific EPS and ROCE targets remain 
commercially sensitive in terms of the Group’s future strategy 
and therefore these targets have not been disclosed in this 
report. We will, however, provide an update on EPS and ROCE 
performance against targets on an annual basis in line with 
feedback that we receive from shareholders on the disclosure 
in respect of the 2014/15 LTPP. The specific target range for 
the 2015/16 LTPP will remain designed to incentivise significant 
performance improvement across the business, deliver a strong 
return to shareholders and represent a stretching target for 
Executive Directors and Senior Management. When setting 
the target range for the 2015/16 LTPP, the Committee has 
also taken into account the Board’s assessment of the optimal 
scale of business, the Group’s ROCE target and current 
market consensus.

Each of the above performance conditions will remain subject 
to an overriding Committee discretion as set out in the Policy. 
Clawback and the two-year continued holding period on 
any shares (net of any shares sold to satisfy tax and national 
insurance liabilities) vesting, will also apply.

Executive Directors’ policy on payment on loss of office
For new appointments to the Board, the terms of a Director’s 
service contract have been revised so that the Company can, at its 
discretion, terminate a Director’s appointment and pay them only 
a monthly salary for the 12 month notice period or until such time 
as the Director secures another job, whichever is the earlier. 

New Chief Financial Officer
On joining the Group, Neil Cooper, the new Chief Financial Officer 
Designate, will receive a salary of £454,000 per annum (pro-rata) 
for FY16. This is exactly the same as David Thomas’ salary prior 
to his appointment as Chief Executive. His remuneration package 
will be in line with the other Executive Directors as detailed above. 
Following advice from NBS, Neil’s long term incentives have been 
structured to replace those he is leaving behind at his previous 
employer, William Hill plc, and are in accordance with the Policy. 
Consequently, vesting dates, use of shares and performance 
linking will be preserved. Full details will be included in our FY16 
Annual Report and Accounts.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201595

Arrangements with past directors (audited) 
Mark Clare stepped down from his position as Group Chief 
Executive on 30 June 2015 and subsequently from the Board 
on 31 July 2015. He will remain employed by the Group up to 
and including 31 October 2015. From 1 August until 31 October 
2015, his terms of employment will remain as per his existing 
service contract to ensure an orderly handover to his successor. 
All payments to him, including those made post-employment, will 
be made in accordance with the Policy. He continues to receive 
his base salary and benefits (holiday, pension contribution, life 
assurance and the other benefits) at pre-1 July 2015 levels. 
He also received an annual bonus totalling £979,892 in respect 
of FY15 but will not receive any payment in lieu of notice nor 
any annual bonus payment for FY16. He will not be granted any 
award under the LTPP during FY16, however the awards made 
in October 2012, 2013 and 2014 will subsist and will vest on a 
pro-rata basis on the normal dates, subject to the respective 
performance conditions and other rules applicable to the LTPP 
(including clawback provisions). The Committee has also agreed 
that the shares currently held for Mark under the Deferred Bonus 
Plan will be released to him (upon settlement of any tax and 
national insurance due) upon his retirement from the Company on 
31 October 2015. 

Any leaving gift to be awarded to Mark on his retirement on 
31 October 2015 will be valued at no more than £5,000 with any tax 
and national insurance due on this being settled by the Company. 
Full details of the actual payments made and shares released to 
Mark will be included in the 2016 Annual Report and Accounts. 

Non-Executive Directors’ fees 
The Board reviewed the fees for the Non-Executive Directors 
(including the Chairman) and concluded that no fee increase 
should be awarded to the Chairman. However, in respect of 
the Non-Executive Directors, given that they had not received 
an increase since 2012 and to ensure that the base fee level 
appropriately reflects the time commitment and responsibilities 
involved, it was agreed that base fees should be increased to 
£56,000 per annum with effect from 1 July 2015. The additional 
fees for the Chairmen of the Committees and to the Senior 
Independent Director remain the same. Accordingly, the annual 
fees payable to the Non-Executive Chairman and Non-Executive 
Directors with effect from 1 July 2015 are as follows:

Table 20 – Non-Executive Directors’ fees

Role

Chairman1

Non-Executive Director base fee

Chairman of Audit Committee

Chairman of Remuneration Committee

Chairman of Safety, Health and Environmental 
Committee

Fee as at  
1 July 2014

Fee as at  

1 July 2015 % increase

£270,000

£300,000

£48,000

£10,000

£10,000

£5,000

£56,000

£10,000

£10,000

£5,000

11.1

16.7

0

0

0

0

Senior Independent Director

£5,000

£5,000

1   The Chairman’s fee increased to £300,000 from 12 November 2014, when John Allan succeeded Bob 

Lawson as the Chairman of the Board.

Statement of shareholding vote at AGM
At the 2014 AGM, resolutions were proposed to shareholders to 
approve the Policy (binding vote) and the Remuneration report 
(advisory vote) for the year ended 30 June 2014 for which the 
following votes were received:

Votes cast in favour

Votes cast against

Total votes cast

Abstentions

Remuneration Policy

Remuneration report

Number of 
votes

% votes  
cast

Number of 
votes

572,737,897

99.00 574,319,290

5,790,872

1.00

4,260,439

% votes  
cast

99.26

0.74

578,528,769

100.00 578,579,729

100.00

4,197,458

4,146,498

This Remuneration report was approved by the Board on 
8 September 2015 and signed on its behalf by: 

Richard Akers  
Non-Executive Director

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements96

Other statutory disclosures

Directors’ Report
The Directors’ Report for the financial year ended 30 June 2015 
comprises pages 46 to 102 inclusive, together with the sections 
incorporated by reference. Any matters on which the Directors 
are required to report on annually, but which do not appear in any 
other section of this report are detailed below.

Activities of the Group
The Company is the holding company of the Group. The Group’s 
principal activities comprise acquiring and developing land, 
planning, designing and constructing residential property 
developments and selling the homes it builds throughout Britain. 
These core activities are supported by the Group’s commercial 
development, urban regeneration, procurement, design and 
strategic land capabilities.

Results and dividends 
The profit from continuing activities for the year ended 30 June 
2015 was £449.4m (2014: £305.4m). 

An interim dividend of 4.8 pence per share was paid on 20 May 
2015 to those shareholders on the register as at close of business 
on 23 April 2015 (2014: 3.2 pence per share). The Directors 
recommend the payment of a final dividend of 10.3 pence per 
share (2014: 7.1 pence per share) in respect of the financial year 
ended 30 June 2015. 

The Directors also recommend the payment of a special cash 
payment of 10.0 pence per share under the Company’s Capital 
Return Plan (see page 9 for further details). 

Both the final dividend and the special cash payment will, subject 
to shareholder approval at the 2015 AGM, be paid on 20 November 
2015 to those shareholders on the register at the close of business 
on 30 October 2015. If approved, the total dividend (including  
the special cash payment) for FY15 is 25.1 pence per share 
(2014: 10.3 pence per share).

Strategic Report
The Group’s Strategic Report is set out on pages 2 to 45 of this 
Annual Report and Accounts and contains details of the Group’s 
greenhouse gas emissions (page 37); our approach to diversity 
and details of diversity within the Group (page 33); our employee 
engagement programme (page 33); an indication of likely future 
developments in the Group including in the field of research and 
development (pages 28 and 29) and the Group’s principal risks 
and uncertainties (pages 40 to 45). 

In addition, details of the Company’s approach to dealing with 
environmental issues in its operations and the impact of and 
management of risks associated with environmental, social and 
governance matters are contained in the Strategic Report on 
pages 40 to 45 and in the Sustainability Report. They can also be 
found in the sustainability section of the Company’s website at 
www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk.

The Group’s financial assets, financial liabilities and derivative 
financial instruments are detailed in notes 24, 25 and 26 to the 
Financial Statements. Details of the Group’s liquidity, market 
price, credit and cash flow risks are set out in note 27 to the 
Financial Statements.

Annual General Meeting
The 2015 AGM will be held at The Royal College of Physicians, 
11 St Andrews Place, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4LE on 
Wednesday 11 November 2015 at 2.30 p.m. The Notice convening 
the 2015 AGM is set out in a separate letter to shareholders.

Directors and their interests 
Details of the Directors who held office during the financial year 
ending 30 June 2015 and as at the date of this report can be found 
on pages 46 and 47.

The beneficial interests of the Directors and connected persons 
in the ordinary share capital of the Company together with the 
interests of the Executive Directors in share options and awards 
of shares as at 30 June 2015 and as at the date of this report are 
disclosed in the Remuneration report on pages 88 and 89.

At no time during or at the end of the year did any Director have 
a material interest in a contract of significance in relation to the 
business of the Group. 

Appointment and replacement of Directors
In accordance with the Articles there shall be no less than two 
and no more than 15 Directors appointed to the Board at any one 
time. Directors may be appointed by the Company by ordinary 
resolution or by the Board. The Board may from time to time 
appoint one or more Directors to hold employment or executive 
office for such period (subject to the Act) and on such terms 
as they may determine and may revoke or terminate any such 
appointment. Directors are not subject to a maximum age limit.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Governance97

In addition to the power under the Act for shareholders to remove 
any Director by ordinary resolution upon the giving of special 
notice, under the Articles the Company may by special resolution 
remove any Director before the expiration of their term of office. 
The office of Director shall be vacated if: (i) they resign or offer 
to resign and the Board resolves to accept such offer; (ii) their 
resignation is requested by all of the other Directors and all of the 
other Directors are not less than three in number; (iii) they are or 
have been suffering from mental or physical ill health; (iv) they 
are absent without permission of the Board from meetings of the 
Board for six consecutive months and the Board resolves that 
their office is vacated; (v) they become bankrupt or compound with 
their creditors generally; (vi) they are prohibited by law from being 
a Director; (vii) they cease to be a Director by virtue of the Act; or 
(viii) they are removed from office pursuant to the Articles.

Details relating to the retirement, election and re-election of 
Directors at each AGM can be found in the Nomination Committee 
report on pages 64 and 65. 

Powers of the Directors
Subject to the Articles, the Act and any directions given by special 
resolution, the business of the Company is ultimately managed 
by the Board who may exercise all the powers of the Company, 
whether relating to the management of the business of the 
Company or otherwise. In particular, the Board may exercise all 
the powers of the Company to borrow money and to mortgage 
or charge any of its undertakings, property, assets and uncalled 
capital and to issue debentures and other securities and to give 
security for any debt, liability or obligation of the Company to any 
third party.

Qualifying third party indemnity provisions 
As at the date of this Annual Report and Accounts, there are 
qualifying third party indemnity provisions governed by the Act 
in place under which the Company has agreed to indemnify 
the Directors, former Directors and the Company Secretary of 
the Company, together with those who have held or hold these 
positions as officers of other Group companies or of associate or 
affiliated companies and members of the Executive Committee, 
to the extent permitted by law and the Articles, against all 
liability arising in respect of any act or omission in the course 
of performing their duties. In addition, the Company maintains 
directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for each Director of the 
Group and its associated companies. 

No Director of the Company or of any associated company shall 
be accountable to the Company or the members for any benefit 
provided pursuant to the Articles and receipt of any such benefit 
shall not disqualify any person from being or becoming a Director 
of the Company.

Related party transactions
The Board and certain members of Senior Management are 
related parties within the definition of IAS 24 (Revised) ‘Related 
Party Disclosures’ (‘IAS 24’) and the Board are related parties 
within the definition of Chapter 11 of the UK Listing Rules 
(‘Chapter 11’). There is no difference between transactions 
with key personnel of the Company and transactions with key 
personnel of the Group.

During the year, the Company entered into the following 
transaction which, for the purposes of IAS 24, is considered to be 
a ‘related party transaction’: 

In August 2014, Mark Clare, then Group Chief Executive, reserved 
an apartment (including a car parking space) from Fulham Wharf 
LLP, a joint venture partnership between BDW Trading Limited 
(‘BDW’) (the Company’s main trading subsidiary) and London and 
Quadrant Housing Trust (L&Q), at a purchase price of £1,692,350. 
This purchase was conducted at a fair and reasonable market 
price based on four independent market valuations and similar 
comparable transactions at that time. An amount of £2,500 
was paid on reservation and a deposit of £166,735 was paid on 
13 October 2014. The remaining balance will become payable 
on legal completion, which is scheduled for December 2015, in 
accordance with the Group’s normal terms of trading.

Fulham Wharf LLP is not controlled by and is not a subsidiary 
undertaking of the Company.

On notification by Mark Clare of the above transaction, the Board 
sought advice from its legal advisers and corporate brokers 
in respect of the application of Chapter 11 and section 190 of 
the Act (Substantial Property Transactions) (‘section 190’) to 
the transactions. The advice received concluded that Chapter 
11 and section 190 did not extend to LLPs and therefore the 
provisions of Chapter 11 and section 190 did not apply to either of 
these transactions. Consequently, no shareholder approval was 
required for the transaction.

No other related party transactions that require disclosure, have 
been entered into during the year under review.

Disclosure of information to auditor 
So far as each of the Directors is aware, there is no relevant audit 
information (that is, information needed by the Company’s auditor 
in connection with preparing its report) of which the Company’s 
auditor is not aware.

Each of the Directors has taken all reasonable steps that they 
ought to have taken in accordance with their duty as a Director 
to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information 
and to ensure that the Company’s auditor is aware of that 
information. This confirmation is given and should be interpreted 
in accordance with the provisions of section 418(2) of the Act.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements98

Governance – Other statutory disclosures continued

Political donations and expenditure
No political donations or expenditure were made or incurred 
during the year (2014: £nil). 

Offices
The Group had 27 offices (excluding those offices undertaking an 
administrative function only) located throughout Britain at the end 
of the financial year. The Group also has a representative office in 
Beijing, China. A full list of the Group’s offices and their locations 
can be obtained from the Group General Counsel and Company 
Secretary at the registered office of the Company or from the 
Company’s website www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk.

Capital structure
The Company has a single class of share capital which is divided 
into ordinary shares of 10 pence each. All issued shares are 
in registered form and are fully paid. Details of the Company’s 
issued share capital and of the movements in the share 
capital during the year can be found in note 29 to the Financial 
Statements on page 149.

Subject to the Articles, the Act and other shareholders’ rights, 
shares are at the disposal of the Board. At each AGM the Board 
seeks authorisation from its shareholders to allot shares. 
At the AGM held on 12 November 2014, the Directors were given 
authority to allot shares up to a nominal value of £32,838,204 
(representing one-third of the nominal value of the Company’s 
issued share capital as at 29 September 2014), such authority to 
remain valid until the end of the 2015 AGM or, if earlier, until the 
close of business on 11 February 2016. A resolution to renew this 
authority will be proposed at the 2015 AGM.

Rights and obligations attaching to shares
Subject to any rights attached to existing shares, shares may 
be issued with such rights and restrictions as the Company may 
by ordinary resolution decide, or (if there is no such resolution 
or so far as it does not make specific provision) as the Board 
may decide. 

Subject to the Act, the Articles specify that rights attached to 
any existing class of shares may be varied either with the written 
consent of the holders of not less than three-fourths in nominal 
value of the issued shares of that class (excluding any shares 
of that class held as treasury shares), or with the sanction of a 
special resolution passed at a separate general meeting of the 
holders of those shares. The rights conferred upon the holders 
of any shares shall not, unless otherwise expressly provided 
in the rights attaching to those shares, be deemed to be varied 
by the creation or issue of further shares ranking pari passu 
with them. 

Voting
Subject to any special terms as to voting upon any shares which 
may be issued or may at the relevant time be held, every member 
present in person or by proxy at a general meeting or class 
meeting has one vote upon a show of hands or, upon a poll vote, 
one vote for every share of which such member is a holder. In the 
case of joint holders of a share, the vote of the senior who tenders 
a vote, whether in person or by proxy, shall be accepted to the 
exclusion of votes of the other joint holders and seniority shall be 
determined by the order in which the names stand in the register 
in respect of the joint holding. 

In accordance with the Act, each member is entitled to appoint 
one or more proxies, and in the case of corporations, more than 
one corporate representative to exercise all or any of their rights 
to attend, speak and vote on their behalf at a general meeting or 
class meeting. The timescales for appointing proxies are set out 
in the Notice of the 2015 AGM. 

No member shall be entitled to vote at any general meeting or 
class meeting in respect of any shares held by them if any call or 
other sum then payable by them in respect of that share remains 
unpaid or if they have been served with a restriction notice (as 
defined in the Articles) after failure to provide the Company with 
information concerning interests in those shares required to be 
provided under the Act. 

Transfer of shares
Shares in the Company may be in uncertificated or certificated 
form. Title to uncertificated shares may be transferred by 
means of a relevant system and certificated shares may be 
transferred by an instrument of transfer as approved by the 
Board. The transferor of a share is deemed to remain the holder 
until the transferee’s name is entered into the Company’s register 
of members.

There are no restrictions on the transfer of shares except as 
follows. The Board may, in its absolute discretion and without 
giving any reason, decline to register any transfer of any share 
which is not a fully paid share. Registration of a transfer of an 
uncertificated share may be refused in the circumstances set out 
in the uncertificated securities rules (as defined in the Articles) 
and where, in the case of a transfer to joint holders, the number of 
joint holders to whom the uncertificated share is to be transferred 
exceeds four. 

The Board may decline to register a transfer of a certificated 
share unless the instrument of transfer: (i) is duly stamped or 
certified or otherwise shown to the satisfaction of the Board to 
be exempt from stamp duty and is accompanied by the relevant 
share certificate and such other evidence of the right to transfer 
as the Board may reasonably require; (ii) is in respect of only one 
class of share; (iii) if joint transferees, is in favour of not more than 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 201599

four such transferees; or (iv) where the transfer is requested by 
a person with a 0.25% interest (as defined in the Articles) if such 
a person has been served with a restriction notice after failure 
to provide the Company with information concerning interests in 
those shares required to be provided under the Act, unless the 
transfer is shown to the Board to be pursuant to an arm’s length 
sale (as defined in the Articles).

Shareholder authority for purchase of own shares 
At the Company’s AGM held on 12 November 2014, shareholders 
gave authority to the Company to buy back up to an aggregate of 
98,514,610 ordinary shares (representing 10% of the Company’s 
issued share capital). This authority is valid until the end of the 
2015 AGM or, if earlier, until the close of business on 11 February 
2016. Under the authority there is a minimum and maximum price 
to be paid for such shares. Any shares which are bought back 
may be held as treasury shares or, if not so held, will be cancelled 
immediately upon completion of the purchase, thereby reducing 
the Company’s issued share capital.

No purchases had been made under this authority as at the date 
of this Annual Report and Accounts. A resolution renewing the 
authority will be proposed at the 2015 AGM.

Dividends and distributions 
Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Company may by ordinary 
resolution from time to time declare dividends for payment to the 
holders of the ordinary shares of 10 pence each, of an amount 
which does not exceed the amount recommended by the Board. 
The Board may pay interim dividends, and also any fixed rate 
dividend, whenever the financial position of the Company, if in 
the opinion of the Board, circumstances justify their payment. 
If the Board acts in good faith, it is not liable to holders of shares 
with preferred or pari passu rights for losses arising from the 
payment of interim or fixed dividends on other shares. The Board 
may withhold payment of all or any part of any dividends or 
other monies payable in respect of the Company’s shares from 
a person with a 0.25% interest if such person has been served 
with a restriction notice after failure to provide the Company with 
information concerning interests in those shares required to be 
provided under the Act.

Shareholder arrangements to waive dividends 
The Barratt Developments Employee Benefit Trust (the ‘EBT’) 
holds ordinary shares in the Company for the purpose of 
satisfying options and awards that have been granted under the 
various employee share schemes operated by the Company. 
Details of the shares so held are set out in note 29 to the 
Financial Statements.

The EBT has agreed to waive all or any future right to dividend 
payments on shares held within the EBT and these shares do 
not count in the calculation of the weighted average number of 
shares used to calculate EPS until such time as they are vested 
to the relevant employee. 

The Trustees of the EBT may vote or abstain from voting on 
shares held in the EBT in any way they think fit and in doing so 
may take into account both financial and non-financial interests 
of the beneficiaries of the EBT or their dependants. 

Employee share schemes
Details of employee share schemes are set out in note 30 to the 
Financial Statements.

Employment policy and involvement
(i) Employment and diversity
The Group is committed to seeking to develop the talents of its 
employees so that they can maximise their career potential and 
providing rewarding careers in an atmosphere that engenders 
equal opportunities for all. Selection for employment and 
promotion is based on merit, following an objective assessment 
of ability and experience of candidates, after giving full and 
fair consideration to all applications (including individuals with 
disabilities). The Group is also committed to ensuring that its 
workplaces are free from discrimination. The Group strives to 
ensure that its policies and practices provide equal opportunities 
in respect of issues such as training, career development and 
promotion for all existing or potential staff irrespective of gender, 
race, ethnic origin, colour, religion, physical disability, marital 
status, sexual orientation or age. Every effort is made to retain 
and support employees who become disabled whilst working 
within the Group. 

(ii) Employee engagement
The Board recognises that appropriate employee engagement 
is a key factor in the long term success of the Group. It utilises a 
comprehensive employee engagement programme with the aim 
of creating a strong, shared culture. All employees are invited to 
take part in an online engagement survey each year. The results 
of this survey are fed back to each operating division who use 
the results to formulate plans for maintaining or improving 
engagement in the following year. 

(iii) Employee communications
A key part of effective employee engagement is communication. 
The Company seeks to ensure that all significant events, 
economic factors and financial updates and the impact of 
these on the performance of the Group are communicated 
to employees. This is mainly channelled through the Group’s 
intranet and the use of email alerts, core briefings and regular 
newsletters. Additionally, the Chief Executive regularly briefs 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements100

Governance – Other statutory disclosures continued

senior and middle management via conference calls and bulletins 
which gives them the opportunity to ask questions and enter into 
dialogue. Individually and collectively, the Board and the Executive 
Committee members visit operating divisions and sites frequently 
in order to assess operational performance, engage with 
employees on a one-to-one basis and gain first-hand experience 
of employees’ aspirations and concerns.

(iv) Future talent
The Group runs a number of programmes for new entrants 
through our ‘Future Talent Strategy’. The Group currently has 
71 graduates across our two-year and one-year schemes, 54 of 
which commenced their training in September 2014. In addition, 
60 delegates have commenced our bespoke Foundation Degree 
in Residential Development and Construction in partnership with 
Sheffield Hallam University. We are currently training 334 Trade, 
Technical and Commercial apprentices and 20 undergraduate 
students on a paid 12-month industrial placement programme. 
(v) Employee training and development
The Group has a suite of leadership and management 
development programmes aimed at all levels within the 
organisation. The programmes are designed and delivered 
internally and are tailored to the needs of the business.

The Group also offers the Barratt Academy, a staged programme 
to enable employee development from apprentice to site 
manager as well as within the areas of technical, commercial 
and sales. Succession planning is in place across the Group 
and the leadership programmes assist with the development of 
individuals as part of this process.

(vi) Employee Sharesave Scheme
In April 2015, the Company invited all eligible employees of the 
Group to participate in the seventh grant under the Savings 
Related Share Option Scheme (the ‘2015 Sharesave’) which was 
approved by shareholders at the Company’s Annual General 
Meeting (‘AGM’) held in November 2008. The invitations for 
the 2015 Sharesave allowed eligible employees to contribute 
a maximum of £500 per month in one or a combination of 
Sharesave schemes as per the previous year. This gave those 
individuals who had participated in previous grants under the 
Sharesave the opportunity to increase their savings and gave 
other employees (new and existing) the chance to participate 
in the 2015 Sharesave and become more involved in the 
Group’s performance. As at 30 June 2015, approximately 
45% of employees participate in one or more of the active 
Sharesave schemes. 

Articles of Association
The Company’s Articles of Association (the ‘Articles’) contain 
regulations which deal with matters such as the appointment 
and removal of Directors, Directors’ interests and proceedings 
at general and Board meetings. Any amendments to the Articles 
may be made in accordance with the provisions of the Companies 
Act 2006 by way of a special resolution at a general meeting.

Approach to tax and tax governance
For all taxes, it is the Group’s aim to ensure it accurately 
calculates and pays the tax that is due at the correct time. 
Whilst the Group does seek to minimise its tax liabilities through 
the use of legitimate routine tax planning, it does not participate 
in aggressive tax planning schemes. The Group also seeks to 
be transparent in its dealings with HM Revenue & Customs and 
has regular dialogue with its representatives to discuss both 
developments in the business and the ongoing tax position. 

The Group Finance Director retains overall responsibility for 
oversight of the tax affairs of the Group. He is the named Senior 
Accounting Officer and receives regular updates on the tax 
position. In addition, taxation is discussed by the Audit Committee 
at least annually. 

Significant agreements 
The following significant agreements contain provisions entitling 
the counterparties to exercise termination or other rights in the 
event of a change of control of the Company:

 > The revolving credit facility agreement dated 14 May 2013 (as 
amended on 17 December 2014) made between, amongst 
others, the Company, Lloyds Bank Plc (as the facility agent) 
and the banks and financial institutions named therein as 
lenders (the ‘Revolving Credit Facility Agreement’) contains a 
prepayment provision at the election of each lender on change 
of control. The Company must notify the facility agent promptly 
upon becoming aware of the change of control. After the 
occurrence of a change of control, the facility agent shall 
(if a lender so requests within 20 days of being notified of the 
change of control) by notice to the Company, on the date falling 
30 days after the change of control, cancel the commitment 
of such lender under the Revolving Credit Facility Agreement 
and declare all amounts outstanding in respect of such lender 
under the Revolving Credit Facility Agreement immediately 
due and payable. The Revolving Credit Facility Agreement also 
contains a provision such that, following a change of control, a 
lender is not obliged to fund any further drawdown of the facility 
(other than rollover loans). For these purposes, a ‘change of 
control’ occurs if any person or group of persons ‘acting in 
concert’ (as defined in the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers) 
gains control (as defined in the Corporation Tax Act 2010) of 
the Company. 

 > Each of the note purchase agreements entered into in respect of 
the Group’s privately placed notes (being the US$80m of notes 
issued pursuant to the following note purchase agreements: 
(i) a note purchase agreement in respect of the issue of US$15m 
notes dated 10 May 2011 (as amended and restated on 14 May 
2013 and as amended on 17 December 2014); and (ii) a note 
purchase agreement in respect of the issue of US$65m notes 
also dated 10 May 2011 (as amended and restated on 14 May 
2013 and as amended on 17 December 2014)) contains a change 
of control prepayment provision. Each such control provision 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015101

provides that promptly after the Company becomes aware that a 
change of control has occurred, the Company shall notify all the 
holders of the notes of the same and give the noteholders the 
option to require the Company to prepay at par all outstanding 
amounts (principal and interest) under the notes. If a noteholder 
accepts such offer of prepayment, such prepayment shall take 
place on a business day that is not more than 90 days after the 
Company notified the noteholders of the change of control. 
For these purposes a ‘change of control’ means the acquisition 
by a person or a group of persons ‘acting in concert’ (as defined 
in the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers) such that they gain 
beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the issued share 
capital of the Company carrying voting rights. 

 > The £100m term facility agreement between, amongst others, 
the Company and Prudential/M&G UK Companies Financing 
Fund LP dated 10 May 2011 (as amended and restated on 14 May 
2013 and as amended on 17 December 2014) also contains a 
prepayment provision on a change of control at the election of 
each lender; such prepayment provision is the same as that 
described for the Revolving Credit Facility Agreement (save for 
the fact that the term loan is fully drawn and so the restrictions 
on drawing described for the Revolving Credit Facility 
Agreement do not apply).

 > Each of the debt facility agreements (based on a proforma 

agreement agreed in October 2012) between the Company (as 
guarantor), BDW (as borrower and developer) and the Homes 
and Communities Agency (‘HCA’) (as lender), whereby the 
HCA has made up to £33m (in aggregate) of project financing 
available to fund up to 20 development sites, contains a 
provision requiring BDW to obtain the consent of the HCA 
on a change in control of the Company, BDW or any of their 
holding companies (if relevant). The HCA is entitled to withhold 
its consent to such a change in control if the new controller 
does not have sufficient reputation, financial standing or 
organisational standing and capacity. A failure to: (i) obtain the 
HCA’s consent to a change in control; and (ii) provide the HCA 
with notice of the change in control within a specified time 
period, is an event of default under each of these agreements. 
On such an event of default the HCA may, by notice in writing to 
BDW, terminate each debt facility agreement and require BDW 
to prepay the project financing. For these purposes a ‘change in 
control’ means the acquisition by a person or a group of persons 
acting together such that they gain beneficial ownership of 
more than 50% of the issued share capital or voting rights of the 
relevant company, have the right to appoint the majority of the 
Directors of the relevant company or otherwise control the votes 
at board meetings of the relevant company.

The note purchase agreements also impose upon the holders 
customary restrictions on resale or transfer of the notes, such as 
the transfer being subject to a de minimis amount.

Going concern
In determining the appropriate basis of preparation of the 
Financial Statements, the Directors are required to consider 
whether the Group can continue in operational existence for the 
foreseeable future.

The Group’s business activities, together with factors which the 
Directors consider are likely to affect its future development, 
financial performance and financial position are set out in the 
Strategic Report on pages 2 to 45. The material financial and 
operational risks and uncertainties that may have an impact upon 
the Group’s performance and their mitigation are outlined on 
pages 40 to 45 and financial risks including liquidity risk, market 
risk, credit risk and capital risk are outlined in note 27 to the 
Financial Statements.

The financial performance of the Group is dependent upon the 
wider economic environment in which the Group operates. 
As explained in the Managing Risk section on pages 40 to 45, 
factors that particularly affect the performance of the Group 
include changes in the macroeconomic environment including 
buyer confidence, availability of mortgage finance for the Group’s 
customers and interest rates.

The Group has total committed bank facilities and private 
placement notes of £848.3m. The final maturity of these 
facilities range from August 2017 to July 2021, with £150.0m 
of the revolving credit facility maturing in December 2017 and 
£550.0m of the revolving credit facility maturing in December 
2019. The committed facilities and private placement notes 
provide appropriate headroom above our current forecast 
debt requirements. 

In addition to these committed borrowing facilities, the Group has 
secured £27.9m of financing from the Government’s ‘Get Britain 
Building’ and ‘Growing Places Fund’ schemes. These funds 
are repayable between December 2015 and March 2018. 
Further committed loan facilities of £11.5m are available under 
agreements with local government which are due to be repaid 
between July 2015 and March 2020.

Accordingly, after making enquiries and having considered 
forecasts and appropriate sensitivities, the Directors have 
formed a judgement, at the time of approving the Financial 
Statements, that there is a reasonable expectation that the Group 
has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for 
the foreseeable future, being at least 12 months from the date 
of these Financial Statements. For this reason, they continue 
to adopt the going concern basis in the preparation of these 
Financial Statements.

On behalf of the Board

Tom Keevil 
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements102

Barratt Developments PLC
Annual Report and Accounts 2015

Governance
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities

Financial Statements and accounting records
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report 
and Accounts including the Directors’ remuneration report and 
the Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law 
and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial 
statements for each financial year. The Directors are required 
by the International Accounting Standards Regulation (the ‘IAS 
Regulation’) to prepare the Group Financial Statements under 
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the 
European Union (‘IFRS’) and have also elected to prepare the 
Parent Company Financial Statements in accordance with IFRS. 
The Financial Statements are also required by law to be properly 
prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and Article 
4 of the IAS Regulation. Under the Disclosure and Transparency 
Rules, the Directors must not approve the Accounts unless they 
are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of 
affairs of the Company and of the profit or loss of the Company for 
that period.

International Accounting Standard 1 requires that Financial 
Statements present fairly for each financial year the Company’s 
financial position, financial performance and cash flows. 
This requires the faithful representation of the effects of 
transactions, other events and conditions in accordance with the 
definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income 
and expenses set out in the International Accounting Standards 
Board’s ‘Framework for the preparation and presentation 
of financial statements’. In virtually all circumstances, a fair 
presentation will be achieved by compliance with all applicable 
IFRS. Directors are also required to:

 > properly select and apply accounting policies;

 > present information, including accounting policies, in a 

manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and 
understandable information;

 > provide additional disclosures when compliance with the 

specific requirements in IFRS are insufficient to enable users to 
understand the impact of particular transactions, other events 
and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial 
performance; and

 > make an assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a 

going concern.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting 
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s 
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time 
the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure 
that the Financial Statements comply with the Companies Act 
2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets 
of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the 
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity 
of the corporate and financial information included on the 
Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing 
the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may 
differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Fair, balanced and understandable
The Board considers, on the advice of the Audit Committee, 
that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, are fair, 
balanced and understandable and provides the information 
necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s 
performance, business model and strategy.

Directors’ responsibility statement
The Directors confirm that, to the best of each person’s knowledge:

a)   the Group and Parent Company Financial Statements in this 
Annual Report and Accounts, which have been prepared in 
accordance with IFRS, Standing Interpretation Committee 
interpretations as adopted and endorsed by the European 
Union, International Financial Reporting Interpretations 
Committee interpretations and those parts of the Companies 
Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS, give 
a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position 
and profit or loss of the Company and of the Group taken as a 
whole; and

b)   the Annual Report and Accounts includes a fair review of the 

development and performance of the business and the position 
of the Company and the Group taken as a whole, together with 
a description of the principal risks and uncertainties they face.

The Directors of the Company and their functions are listed on 
pages 46 and 47.

By order of the Board

John Allan 
Chairman 

David Thomas 
Chief Executive 

8 September 2015   

8 September 2015

The Directors’ Report from pages 46 to 102 inclusive was 
approved by the Board on 8 September 2015 and is signed on its 
behalf by:

Tom Keevil  
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary

 
 
103

Financial Statements
Independent auditor’s report to the members 
of Barratt Developments PLC

Going concern
As required by the Listing Rules we have reviewed the Directors’ 
statement contained within the Accounting policies on pages 112 
to 117 that the Group is a going concern. We confirm that:

 > we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going 

concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial 
statements is appropriate; and

 > we have not identified any material uncertainties that may 

cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a 
going concern.

However, because not all future events or conditions can be 
predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the Group’s 
ability to continue as a going concern.

Our assessment of risks of material misstatement
The assessed risks of material misstatement described below, 
which are the same risks as identified in the prior year, are 
those that had the greatest effect on our audit strategy, the 
allocation of resources in the audit and directing the efforts of the 
engagement team. 

Opinion on the financial statements of Barratt Developments PLC
In our opinion:

 > the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of 
the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 30 June 
2015 and of the Group’s profit for the year then ended;

 > the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in 
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards 
(IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union;

 > the Parent Company financial statements have been properly 

prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European 
Union and as applied in accordance with the provisions of the 
Companies Act 2006; and

 > the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with 
the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards 
the Group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.

The financial statements comprise the Consolidated income 
statement, the Group and Parent Company statements of 
comprehensive income, the Group and Parent Company 
statements of changes in shareholders’ equity, the Group and 
Parent Company balance sheets, the Group and Parent Company 
cash flow statements, the Accounting policies, the Impact of 
standards and interpretations in issue but not yet effective, the 
Critical Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation 
Uncertainty and the related notes 1 to 36. The financial reporting 
framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable 
law and IFRSs as adopted by the European Union and, as 
regards the Parent Company financial statements, as applied in 
accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006.

Risk
Carrying value of land and work in progress – land £2,826.1m (2014: £2,348.4m), work in progress £1,287.4m (2014: £1,118.2m)
Refer to page 68 (Audit Committee statement), page 119 (Critical Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty) and page 134 (financial statement disclosures)

How the scope of our audit responded to the risk

The Group’s assessment of the carrying 
value of land and work in progress, being 
the lower of cost and net realisable value, 
is a judgemental process. This requires 
the estimation of selling prices, sales 
rates and costs to complete, determined 
on a site by site basis. These factors drive 
the gross margin for each site and hence 
the profit recognised at the point of sale. 

Revenue recognition on social housing 
developments accounted for under IAS 
11 ‘Construction Contracts’ requires 
additional judgement in calculating the 
revenue and profit to be recognised, 
estimating the total expected costs to 
complete each site and the percentage of 
completion at the balance sheet date.

Our work involved the following: 

 > We have tested the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of the Group’s controls relating to the 

determination of costs to complete as this is the most significant judgement applied to each site valuation. We attended a 
number of valuation meetings across all regions that review the carrying value of land and work in progress of individual 
sites. A sample of sites were also visited to enable us to verify how surveyors measure the degree of build completion of 
the developments against the costs incurred to date and to measure the subcontractor accruals at the year end. 

 > For multi-phased sites we have performed procedures to validate the appropriateness of actual and forecast margin 

maintained across the individual phases of the entire site.

 > We have reviewed the land acquisition appraisal process and viability assessment at acquisition and tested the design, 

implementation and operating effectiveness of the key controls.

 > We have sample tested and agreed certain costs incurred to date included within land and work in progress as well as 

reviewing the proportion of that expenditure recognised as a cost of sale in the year in respect of units sold.

 > We have used IT interrogation tools to test the model prepared by Management to calculate the net realisable value of 

sites to ascertain the mechanical accuracy of the formulae being applied to the inputs to specific sites. 

 > We have tested each of the key assumptions within Management’s model on forecast sales values, sales rates and costs 
to complete which support the basis of the carrying value of land and work in progress. We have compared the Group’s 
assumptions to external market forecasts for sales price inflation and build cost inflation and have tested a sample of 
sites to current market data on sales rates, sales prices and cost assumptions. We have also tested the accuracy of costs 
to complete assumptions on a sample basis.

 > We have performed independent sensitivity analysis, informed by external forecasts, to measure the impact on 
the carrying value of land and work in progress through possible deviations around the assumptions applied by 
management. 

 > A sample of construction contracts for social housing developments have been tested by verifying the costs incurred to 
date and recalculating the percentage of completion at the balance sheet date. A selection of these schemes have been 
reviewed with a sample of costs agreed to third party surveyors’ certificates, total sales values agreed to contracts, and 
the recognition formula verified to support revenue recognised.

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportOther Information 
104

Financial Statements – Independent auditor’s report to the members of Barratt Developments PLC continued

Risk
Valuation of available for sale financial assets – £107.0m (2014: £122.4m)
Refer to page 68 (Audit Committee statement), page 119 (Critical Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty) and page 133 (financial statement disclosures)

How the scope of our audit responded to the risk

The Group’s available for sale financial 
assets, represented by shared equity 
properties, are held at fair value. The 
assets represent loans granted as part 
of housing sales transactions that are 
secured by way of a second charge on 
the respective property. The valuation, 
which determines the level of provision 
to be recorded against the gross value of 
the loans granted, requires the exercise 
of significant judgement. Significant 
judgements are made in estimating the 
timing and quantum of the future cash 
flows expected from the redemption of the 
loans, including an estimate of the market 
value of the property at the estimated time 
of repayment, and the determination of 
a suitable discount rate to calculate the 
present value of the cash flows.

Our work involved the following:

 > We have tested the design and implementation of the Group’s controls relating to Management’s redemption 
assumptions on value and timing as these are the most significant judgements applied within the valuation.  

 > The mathematical accuracy of the model has been reviewed through the use of IT interrogation tools to validate that the 

formulae and results are correctly applied and mapped to specific loans.

 > We have tested each of the key assumptions underpinning the fair value model through comparison to historic experience 
of the Group in terms of redemption values and defaults, tested the consistency of assumptions employed by the Group 
for forecast sales price inflation and compared the discount rate employed to the equivalent interest rate levied on a 
second charge loan of similar quantum and duration to the average loan issued by the Group. 

 > We have reviewed the forecast redemption profile for the various tranches of assets in line with the Group’s redemption 

experience and against the underlying terms of the agreement to which the customer is bound. We have performed 
an analysis of geographical spread of the borrowers to support Management’s expected redemption profile, including 
consideration of the dispersion of the assets in determining the appropriate level of sales price inflation, default rate and 
expected redemption date.

 > We have employed sensitivity analysis to the key assumptions to establish the quantum of the impact caused by flexing 

certain inputs to the model. 

 > We have reviewed the appropriateness of the disclosures provided in accordance with IFRS 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ 

and IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’, including the classification within the fair value hierarchy.

Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets – £892.2m (2014: £892.2m)
Refer to page 68 (Audit Committee statement), page 119 (Critical Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty) and pages 126 and 127 (financial statement disclosures)

The Group’s assessment of impairment 
of goodwill and intangible assets is a 
judgemental process which requires 
estimates concerning the forecast future 
cash flows associated with the goodwill 
and brand assets held, the discount rates 
and the growth rate of revenue and costs 
to be applied in determining the value in 
use.

Our work involved the following:

 > We have tested the design and implementation of the Group’s controls relating to Management’s impairment review of 

goodwill and intangible assets.  

 > We have tested the accuracy of the underlying model to assess whether the processes are applied to the correct input 

data and the outputs are mapped accurately.

 > We challenged each of the key assumptions employed in the annual goodwill impairment test. This included reference to 
our internal valuation specialists’ benchmarking of the weighted average cost of capital rate (‘WACC’) employed as the 
discount rate employed, including its methodology and constituent inputs, comparison to independent market forecasts 
of revenue and cost growth in the housebuilding sector and an assessment of the Group’s historic forecasting accuracy. 

 > We have tested Management’s sensitivity analysis in relation to the key inputs to the goodwill impairment test model, as 
well as performing our own sensitivity analysis which included changes to volume, margin and the discount rate applied.

 > We have reviewed the appropriateness of the disclosures provided in accordance with IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’.

An overview of the scope of our audit
Our Group audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the 
Group and its environment, including Group-wide controls, and 
assessing the risks of material misstatement at the Group level. 
The entire Group is audited by one audit team, led by the Senior 
Statutory Auditor. The audit is performed centrally and comprises 
all of the divisions which comprise the Group’s housebuilding 
segment, the Group’s commercial developments segment and 
the head office consolidation. We choose to visit the Group’s three 
London housebuilding divisions each year, as well as five further 
non-London housebuilding divisions across each of the Group’s 
regions, selected on a rotational basis and with reference to size 
and complexity among other factors. We also visit Wilson Bowden 
Developments Limited on an annual basis, which constitutes the 
Group’s commercial developments segment.

Our audit procedures relating to these matters were designed in 
the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and 
not to express an opinion on individual accounts or disclosures. 
Our opinion on the financial statements is not modified with 
respect to any of the risks described above, and we do not express 
an opinion on these individual matters.

Our application of materiality
We define materiality as the magnitude of misstatement in the 
financial statements that makes it probable that the economic 
decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable person would be 
changed or influenced. We use materiality both in planning the 
scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work. 

We determined materiality for the Group to be £27.6m 
(2014: £24.0m), which is calculated based on 5.0% (2014: 6.1%) of 
statutory pre-tax profit. 

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report 
to the Committee all audit differences in excess of £0.55m 
(2014: £0.48m), as well as differences below that threshold 
that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. 
We also report to the Audit Committee on disclosure matters 
that we identified when assessing the overall presentation of the 
financial statements. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015105

Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion:

 > the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has 
been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 
2006; and

 > the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors’ 
report for the financial year for which the financial statements 
are prepared is consistent with the financial statements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception
Adequacy of explanations received and accounting records
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, 
in our opinion:

 > we have not received all the information and explanations we 

require for our audit; or

 > adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent 

Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been 
received from branches not visited by us; or

 > the Parent Company financial statements are not in agreement 

with the accounting records and returns.

We have nothing to report in respect of these matters.

Directors’ remuneration
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are also required to report if in 
our opinion certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration have 
not been made or the part of the Directors’ remuneration report 
to be audited is not in agreement with the accounting records and 
returns. We have nothing to report arising from these matters.

Corporate governance statement
Under the Listing Rules we are also required to review the part of 
the Corporate governance statement relating to the Company’s 
compliance with ten provisions of the UK Corporate Governance 
Code. We have nothing to report arising from our review.

Our duty to read other information in the Annual Report
Under International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland), we 
are required to report to you if, in our opinion, information in the 
Annual Report is:

 > materially inconsistent with the information in the audited 

financial statements; or

 > apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially 

inconsistent with, our knowledge of the Group acquired in the 
course of performing our audit; or

 > otherwise misleading.

In particular, we are required to consider whether we have 
identified any inconsistencies between our knowledge acquired 
during the audit and the Directors’ statement that they consider 
the Annual Report is fair, balanced and understandable and 
whether the Annual Report appropriately discloses those 
matters that we communicated to the Audit Committee which we 
consider should have been disclosed. We confirm that we have not 
identified any such inconsistencies or misleading statements.

Respective responsibilities of Directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ 
responsibilities, the Directors are responsible for the preparation 
of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give 
a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express 
an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with 
applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and 
Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing 
Practices Board’s Ethical Standards for Auditors. We also 
comply with International Standard on Quality Control 1 (UK 
and Ireland). Our audit methodology and tools aim to ensure 
that our quality control procedures are effective, understood 
and applied. Our quality controls and systems include our 
dedicated professional standards review team and independent 
partner reviews.

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a 
body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies 
Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might 
state to the Company’s members those matters we are required 
to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. 
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or 
assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the 
Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, 
or for the opinions we have formed.

Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and 
disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give 
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free 
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. 
This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies 
are appropriate to the Group’s and the Parent Company’s 
circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately 
disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates 
made by the Directors; and the overall presentation of the 
financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and 
non-financial information in the Annual Report to identify material 
inconsistencies with the audited financial statements and to 
identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect 
based on, or materially inconsistent with, the knowledge acquired 
by us in the course of performing the audit. If we become aware 
of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we 
consider the implications for our report.

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

Mark Goodey (Senior Statutory Auditor) 
for and on behalf of Deloitte LLP 
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor 
London, United Kingdom

8 September 2015

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportOther Information 
106

Consolidated Income Statement

Year ended 30 June 2015

Continuing operations
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Administrative expenses
Profit from operations
Finance income
Finance costs
Net finance costs
Share of post-tax profit from joint ventures
Share of post-tax profit/(loss) from associates
Profit before tax
Tax
Profit for the year
Profit for the year attributable to the owners of the Company
Profit for the year attributable to non-controlling interests
Earnings per share from continuing operations
Basic
Diluted

The notes on pages 112 to 160 form an integral part of these Financial Statements.

Notes

1, 2

3
4
4
4
13
13

6

16

9
9

2015 
£m

2014 
£m

3,759.5
(3,045.2)
714.3
(137.5)
576.8
7.6
(64.6)
(57.0)
45.4
0.3
565.5
(115.2)
450.3
449.4
0.9

3,157.0
(2,627.6)
529.4
(119.6)
409.8
9.1
(68.8)
(59.7)
40.6
(0.1)
390.6
(85.2)
305.4
305.4
–

45.5p
44.6p

31.2p
30.4p

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements107

Statements of Comprehensive Income

Year ended 30 June 2015

Profit for the year
Other comprehensive income/(expense):
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss
Actuarial (loss)/gain on defined benefit pension scheme
Fair value adjustment on available for sale financial assets 
Tax credit/(charge) relating to items not reclassified
Total items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss 
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Amounts deferred in respect of effective cash flow hedges
Amounts reclassified to the Income Statement in respect of hedged cash flows
Tax charge relating to items that may be reclassified
Total items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Total comprehensive income recognised for the year
Total comprehensive income recognised for the year attributable to the 
owners of the Company 
Total comprehensive income recognised for the year attributable to 
non-controlling interests

The notes on pages 112 to 160 form an integral part of these Financial Statements.

Notes

28
17

4, 31
4, 31
18

2015 
£m

450.3

(11.5)
5.1
1.3
(5.1)

(0.5)
2.9
(0.5)
1.9
447.1

Group

2014 
£m

305.4

3.5
0.7
(1.2)
3.0

(5.4)
11.7
(2.0)
4.3
312.7

446.2

312.7

16

0.9

–

2015 
£m

16.7

(11.5)
–
2.4
(9.1)

(0.5)
2.9
(0.5)
1.9
9.5

9.5

–

Company

2014 
£m

165.4

3.5
–
(0.8)
2.7

(5.4)
11.7
(2.0)
4.3
172.4

172.4

–

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements108

Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

Group 

Share 
capital 
£m

Share 
premium 
£m

Merger 
reserve 
£m

Hedging 
reserve 
£m

Own 
shares 
£m

Share-
based 
payments 
£m

Retained 
earnings 
due to 
share 
holders 
of the 
Group 
£m

Total 
retained 
earnings 
due to 
share 
holders 
of the 
Group 
£m

98.0
–
–

213.4
–
–

1,109.0
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
0.5
–
–

–

–
–
98.5
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
1.0
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
1.4
–
–

–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

–

–
–
214.8
–
–

–
–
1,109.0
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
4.3
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

(19.9)
–
(5.4)

11.7

–
–
(2.0)

4.3
–
–
–
–

–

–
–
(15.6)
–
(0.5)

2.9

–
–
(0.5)

1.9
–
–
–
–

(3.6)
–
–

21.7
–
–

1,654.6 1,672.7
305.4
–

305.4
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
0.4

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
9.0
–

–

–

0.7
3.5
(1.2)

308.4
(55.9)
(0.4)
–
–

0.7
3.5
(1.2)

308.4
(55.9)
(0.4)
9.0
0.4

–

(7.8)

7.8

–

–
–
(3.2)
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
0.5

–
1.7
24.6
–
–

–
3.4

–
5.1
1,917.9 1,939.3
449.4
449.4
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
11.6
–

–

–

5.1
(11.5)
1.3

5.1
(11.5)
1.3

444.3
(117.7)
(0.7)
–
–

444.3
(117.7)
(0.7)
11.6
0.5

Non- 
controlling 
interests 
(note 16) 
£m

Total 
equity 
£m
– 3,073.2
305.4
–
(5.4)
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

–

11.7

0.7
3.5
(3.2)

312.7
(55.9)
1.5
9.0
0.4

–

8.0
–

8.0
5.1
8.0 3,354.0
450.3
0.9
(0.5)
–

–

–
–
–

0.9
–
–
–
–

2.9

5.1
(11.5)
0.8

447.1
(117.7)
4.6
11.6
0.5

–
–
99.5

–
–

–
–
219.1 1,109.0

–
–
(13.7)

–
–
(2.7)

(3.6) 
1.4
34.0

3.6
9.8

–
11.2
2,257.2 2,288.5

–
–

–
11.2
8.9 3,711.3

At 1 July 2013
Profit for the year
Amounts deferred in respect of effective cash flow hedges
Amounts reclassified to the Income Statement in respect 
of hedged cash flows
Fair value adjustments on available for sale financial 
assets
Actuarial gains on pension scheme
Tax on items taken directly to equity
Total comprehensive income recognised for the year 
ended 30 June 2014
Dividend payments
Issue of shares
Share-based payments
Disposal of own shares
Transfer of share-based payments charge for exercised/
lapsed options
Non-controlling interest arising on acquisition of land in a 
non-wholly owned subsidiary
Tax on share-based payments
At 30 June 2014
Profit for the year
Amounts deferred in respect of effective cash flow hedges
Amounts reclassified to the Income Statement in respect 
of hedged cash flows
Fair value adjustments on available for sale financial 
assets
Actuarial losses on pension scheme
Tax on items taken directly to equity
Total comprehensive income recognised for the year 
ended 30 June 2015
Dividend payments
Issue of shares
Share-based payments
Disposal of own shares
Transfer of share-based payments charge for exercised/
lapsed options
Tax on share-based payments 
At 30 June 2015

The notes on pages 112 to 160 form an integral part of these Financial Statements.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements109

Company

At 1 July 2013
Profit for the year
Amounts deferred in respect 
of effective cash flow hedges
Amounts reclassified to the Income Statement in 
respect of hedged cash flows
Actuarial gains on pension scheme
Tax on items taken directly to equity
Total comprehensive expense recognised for the 
year ended 30 June 2014
Dividend payments
Issue of shares
Share-based payments
Disposal of own shares
Transfer of share-based payments charge for 
exercised/lapsed options
Tax on share-based payments
At 30 June 2014
Profit for the year
Amounts deferred in respect of effective cash flow 
hedges
Amounts reclassified to the Income Statement in 
respect of hedged cash flows
Actuarial losses on pension scheme
Tax on items taken directly to equity
Total comprehensive income recognised for the 
year ended 30 June 2015
Dividend payments
Issue of shares
Share-based payments
Disposal of own shares
Transfer of share-based payments charge for 
exercised/lapsed options
Tax on share-based payments
At 30 June 2015

Share 
capital 
£m

Share 
premium 
£m

98.0
–

213.4
–

Merger 
reserve 
£m

1,109.0
–

Hedging 
reserve 
£m

Own 
Shares 
£m

Share-
based 
payments 
£m

(3.6)
–

16.4
–

(19.9)
–

(5.4)

11.7
–
(2.0)

4.3
–
–
–
–

–
–
(15.6)
–

(0.5)

2.9
–
(0.5)

1.9
–
–
–
–

Retained 
earnings 
£m

2,425.0
165.4

Total 
retained 
earnings 
£m

2,437.8
165.4

Total 
equity 
£m

3,838.3
165.4

–

–

(5.4)

–
3.5
(0.8)

168.1
(55.9)
(0.4)
–
–

–
3.5
(0.8)

168.1
(55.9)
(0.4)
9.0
0.4

11.7
3.5
(2.8)

172.4
(55.9)
1.5
9.0
0.4

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
9.0
–

(7.8)
0.5
18.1
–

1.7
0.9
2,539.4
16.7

(6.1)
1.4
2,554.3
16.7

(6.1)
1.4
3,961.0
16.7

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
11.6
–

–

–

(0.5)

–
(11.5)
2.4

7.6
(117.7)
(0.7)
–
–

–
(11.5)
2.4

7.6
(117.7)
(0.7)
11.6
0.5

2.9
(11.5)
1.9

9.5
(117.7)
4.6
11.6
0.5

(3.6)
0.1
26.2

1.4
2.3
2,432.3

(2.2)
2.4
2,455.8

(2.2)
2.4
3,869.7

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
0.4

–
–
(3.2)
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
0.5

–
–
(2.7)

–

–
–
–

–
–
1.4
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

–
–
214.8
–

–
–
1,109.0
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
4.3
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
0.5
–
–

–
–
98.5
–

–

–
–
–

–
–
1.0
–
–

–
–
99.5

The notes on pages 112 to 160 form an integral part of these Financial Statements.

–
–
219.1

–
–
1,109.0

–
–
(13.7)

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements110

Balance Sheets

At 30 June 2015

Assets

Non-current assets
Other intangible assets
Goodwill
Property, plant and equipment
Investments in subsidiary undertakings
Investments in joint ventures and associates
Retirement benefit assets
Available for sale financial assets
Trade and other receivables
Deferred tax assets
Derivative financial instruments – swaps

Current assets
Inventories
Available for sale financial assets
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents

Total assets
Liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Loans and borrowings
Trade and other payables
Deferred tax liabilities
Derivative financial instruments – swaps

Current liabilities
Loans and borrowings
Trade and other payables
Current tax liabilities

Total liabilities
Net assets
Equity
Share capital
Share premium
Merger reserve
Hedging reserve
Retained earnings
Equity attributable to the owners of the Company
Non-controlling interests
Total equity

Notes

2015 
£m

Group

2014 
£m

2015 
£m

Company

2014 
£m

11
10
12
15
13
28
17
20
18
26

19
17
20
23

25
21
18
26

25
21

29

16

100.0
792.2
8.2
–
200.0
5.3
96.8
3.3
–
2.3
1,208.1

4,173.6
10.2
158.8
360.4
4,703.0
5,911.1

(163.3)
(605.9)
(1.2)
(17.0)
(787.4)

(13.2)
(1,349.8)
(49.4)
(1,412.4)
(2,199.8)
3,711.3

99.5
219.1
1,109.0
(13.7)
2,288.5
3,702.4
8.9
3,711.3

100.0
792.2
6.1
–
199.6
3.1
121.6
6.2
19.6
–
1,248.4

3,508.6
0.8
111.8
274.7
3,895.9
5,144.3

(161.7)
(447.3)
–
(21.2)
(630.2)

(38.4)
(1,112.0)
(9.7)
(1,160.1)
(1,790.3)
3,354.0

98.5
214.8
1,109.0
(15.6)
1,939.3
3,346.0
8.0
3,354.0

–
–
3.8
3,097.8
25.6
5.3
–
–
7.1
2.3
3,141.9

–
–
697.7
294.1
991.8
4,133.7

(138.6)
–
–
(17.0)
(155.6)

(58.5)
(49.9)
–
(108.4)
(264.0)
3,869.7

99.5
219.1
1,109.0
(13.7)
2,455.8
3,869.7
–
3,869.7

–
–
2.3
3,110.5
25.6
3.1
–
–
27.9
–
3,169.4

–
–
812.1
259.0
1,071.1
4,240.5

(134.4)
–
–
(21.2)
(155.6)

(56.8)
(67.1)
–
(123.9)
(279.5)
3,961.0

98.5
214.8
1,109.0
(15.6)
2,554.3
3,961.0
–
3,961.0

The Financial Statements of Barratt Developments PLC (registered number 604574) were approved by the Board and authorised for issue on 
8 September 2015. Signed on behalf of the Board.

David Thomas 
Chief Executive 

John Allan  
Chairman

The notes on pages 112 to 160 form an integral part of these Financial Statements.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements111

Cash Flow Statements

Year ended 30 June 2015

Net cash inflow from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Cash outflow arising on acquisition of land in a non-wholly controlled subsidiary
Decrease/(increase) in investments accounted for using the equity method
Dividends received from investments accounted for using the equity method
Investment in property fund
Interest received
Dividends received from subsidiaries
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid
Disposal of own shares
Proceeds from issue of share capital
Make-whole fee on redemption of private placement notes
Loan (repayments)/drawdown

Net cash outflow from financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

The notes on pages 112 to 160 form an integral part of these Financial Statements. 

2015 
£m

184.0

(5.4)
–
18.3
27.0
–
2.3
–
42.2

(117.7)
0.5
4.6
–
(27.9)

(140.5)
85.7
274.7
360.4

Group

2014 
£m

242.3

(4.7)
(0.9)
(59.2)
23.6
1.3
3.7
–
 (36.2)

(55.9)
0.4
1.5
(53.0)
(118.8)

(225.8)
(19.7)
294.4
274.7

Company

2014 
£m

18.5

(2.3)
–
0.2
–
–
58.1
160.0
216.0

(55.9)
0.4
1.5
(53.0)
(142.5)

(249.5)
(15.0)
274.0
259.0

2015 
£m

68.8

(2.8)
–
–
–
–
60.0
19.9
77.1

(117.7)
0.5
4.6
–
1.8

(110.8)
35.1
259.0
294.1

Notes

32

12

13
13
17

7

23

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements112

Financial Statements
Accounting Policies

Year ended 30 June 2015

Basis of preparation

These Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as issued by the 
International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’), International 
Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (‘IFRIC’) Interpretations 
and Standing Interpretations Committee (‘SIC’) interpretations as 
adopted and endorsed by the European Union (‘EU’) and with those 
parts of the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting 
under IFRS and therefore the Group Financial Statements comply with 
Article 4 of the EU International Accounting Standards Regulation. 
The Financial Statements have been prepared under the historical cost 
convention as modified by the revaluation of available for sale financial 
assets, derivative financial instruments and share-based payments. 
A summary of the more significant Group accounting policies is set 
out below.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally 
accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and 
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities 
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of 
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although these 
estimates are based on the Directors’ best knowledge of the amounts, 
actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates. The most 
significant estimates made by the Directors in these Financial 
Statements are set out in ‘Critical Accounting Judgements and Key 
Sources of Estimation Uncertainty’.

Going concern

In determining the appropriate basis of preparation of the Financial 
Statements, the Directors are required to consider whether the Group 
can continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. 

The Group’s business activities, together with factors which the 
Directors consider are likely to affect its future development, financial 
performance and financial position are set out in the Strategic Report 
on pages 2 to 45. The material financial and operational risks and 
uncertainties that may have an impact upon the Group’s performance 
and their mitigation are outlined on pages 40 to 45 and financial risks 
including liquidity risk, market risk, credit risk and capital risk are 
outlined in note 27 to the Financial Statements. 

The financial performance of the Group is dependent upon the wider 
economic environment in which the Group operates. As explained in 
the Risk management section on pages 40 to 45, factors that 
particularly affect the performance of the Group include changes in the 
macroeconomic environment including buyer confidence, availability of 
mortgage finance for the Group’s customers and interest rates. 

The Group has total committed bank facilities and private placement 
notes of £848.3m. The final maturity dates of these facilities range 
from August 2017 to July 2021, with £150.0m of the revolving credit 
facility maturing in December 2017 and £550.0m of the revolving credit 
facility maturing in December 2019. The committed facilities and 
private placement notes provide appropriate headroom above our 
current forecast debt requirements. 

In addition to these committed borrowing facilities the Group has 
£27.9m of financing from the Government’s ‘Get Britain Building’ and 
‘Growing Places Fund’ schemes. The outstanding funds are repayable 
between December 2015 and March 2018. Further committed loan 
facilities of £11.5m are available under agreements with local 
government which are due to be repaid between July 2015 and 
March 2020.  

Accordingly, after making enquiries and having considered forecasts 
and appropriate sensitivities, the Directors have formed a judgement, 
at the time of approving the Financial Statements, that there is a 
reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to 
continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, being at 
least twelve months from the date of these Financial Statements. 
For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in the 
preparation of these Financial Statements.

Adoption of new and revised standards

In the year ended 30 June 2015, the Group has adopted the following 
standards, amendments and interpretations, none of which have had a 
material impact on the Group:

•  IFRS 10: Consolidated Financial Statements

•  IFRS 11: Joint Arrangements

•  IFRS 12: Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities

• 

IAS 27: Separate Financial Statements

•  IAS 28: Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures

•  IFRIC 21: Levies 

•  Annual Improvements Cycle 2009 – 2011

• 

• 

• 

• 

 Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12: Consolidated 
Financial Statements, Joint Arrangements and Disclosure of 
Interests in Other Entities – Transition Guidance

 Amendments to IAS 32: Financial Instruments: Presentation 
– Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

 Amendments to IAS 36: Recoverable Amount Disclosures for 
Non-Financial Assets

 Amendments to IAS 39: Novation of Derivatives and Continuation 
of Hedge Accounting

The adoption of IFRS 12 ‘Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities’ has 
resulted in enhanced disclosures relating to the Group’s jointly 
controlled entities, jointly controlled operations and non-controlling 
interests (see notes 13, 14 and 16).

Basis of consolidation

The Group Financial Statements include the results of Barratt 
Developments PLC (the ‘Company’), incorporated in the UK, and all its 
subsidiary undertakings made up to 30 June. The financial statements 
of subsidiary undertakings are consolidated from the date when 
control passes to the Group using the purchase method of accounting 
and up to the date control ceases. All transactions with subsidiaries 
and intercompany profits or losses are eliminated on consolidation.

Business combinations

All of the subsidiaries’ identifiable assets and liabilities, including 
contingent liabilities, existing at the date of acquisition are recorded at 
their fair values. All changes to those assets and liabilities and the 
resulting gains and losses that arise after the Group has gained control 
of the subsidiary are included in the post-acquisition income statement.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015113

Jointly controlled entities

Exceptional items

A jointly controlled entity is an entity, including an unincorporated entity 
such as a partnership, in which the Group holds an interest with one or 
more other parties where a contractual arrangement has established 
joint control over the entity. Jointly controlled entities are accounted for 
using the equity method of accounting.

Jointly controlled operations

The Group enters into jointly controlled operations as part of its 
housebuilding and property development activities. The Group’s share 
of profits and losses from its investments in such jointly controlled 
operations is accounted for on a direct basis and is included in the 
Income Statement. The Group’s share of its investments, assets and 
liabilities is accounted for on a directly proportional basis in the Group’s 
Balance Sheet.

Associated entities

An associated entity is an entity, including an unincorporated entity 
such as a partnership, in which the Group holds a significant influence 
and that is neither a subsidiary nor an interest in a joint venture. 
Associated entities are accounted for using the equity method 
of accounting.

Revenue

Revenue is recognised at legal completion in respect of the total 
proceeds of building and development. An appropriate proportion of 
revenue from construction contracts is recognised by reference to the 
stage of completion of contract activity. Revenue is measured at the fair 
value of consideration received or receivable and represents the 
amounts receivable for the property, net of discounts and VAT. The sale 
proceeds of part-exchange properties are not included in revenue.

Interest income is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal 
outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable.

Construction contracts

Revenue is only recognised on a construction contract where the 
outcome can be estimated reliably. Variations to, and claims arising in 
respect of, construction contracts, are included in revenue to the extent 
that they have been agreed with the customer. Revenue and costs are 
recognised by reference to the stage of completion of contract activity 
at the balance sheet date. This is normally measured by surveys of 
work performed to date. Contracts are only treated as construction 
contracts when they have been specifically negotiated for the 
construction of a development or property. When it is probable that the 
total costs on a construction contract will exceed total contract 
revenue, the expected loss is recognised as an expense in the Income 
Statement immediately.

Amounts recoverable on construction contracts are included in trade 
receivables and stated at cost plus attributable profit less any 
foreseeable losses. Payments received on account for construction 
contracts are deducted from amounts recoverable on 
construction contracts.

Payments received in excess of amounts recoverable on construction 
contracts are included in trade payables.

Items that are material in size or unusual or infrequent in nature are 
presented as exceptional items in the Income Statement. The Directors 
are of the opinion that the separate presentation of exceptional items 
provides helpful information about the Group’s underlying business 
performance. Examples of events that, inter alia, may give rise to the 
classification of items as exceptional are the restructuring of existing 
and newly-acquired businesses, refinancing costs, gains or losses on 
the disposal of businesses or individual assets, pension scheme 
curtailments and asset impairments, including land, work in progress, 
goodwill and investments.

Profit from operations

Profit from operations includes all of the revenue and costs derived 
from the Group’s operating businesses. Profit from operations 
excludes finance costs, finance income, the Group’s share of profits or 
losses from joint ventures and associates and tax. 

Segmental reporting

The Group consists of two separate segments for internal reporting, 
regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to allocate 
resources to the segments and to assess their performance, being 
housebuilding and commercial developments. These segments 
therefore comprise the primary reporting segments within the 
Financial Statements. All of the Group’s operations are within Britain, 
which is one geographic market in the context of managing the 
Group’s activities.

Goodwill

Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the excess of the fair 
value of the consideration over the fair value of the separately 
identifiable net assets and liabilities acquired. 

Goodwill arising on the acquisition of subsidiary undertakings and 
businesses is capitalised as an asset but reviewed for impairment at 
least annually.

For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each of 
the Group’s cash-generating units expected to benefit from the 
synergies of the combination at acquisition being housebuilding and 
commercial developments. Cash-generating units to which goodwill 
has been allocated are tested for impairment at least annually. If the 
recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the 
carrying amount of the unit, the impairment loss is allocated first to 
reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the unit and 
then to the other assets of the unit pro rata on the basis of the carrying 
amount of each asset in the unit. Any impairment loss is recognised 
immediately in the Income Statement and is not subsequently reversed.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements114

Financial Statements – Accounting Policies continued

Intangible assets

Leases as lessee

Brands
Internally generated brands are not capitalised. The Group has 
capitalised as intangible assets brands that have been acquired. 
Acquired brand values are calculated using discounted cash flows. 
Where a brand is considered to have a finite life, it is amortised over its 
useful life on a straight-line basis. Where a brand is capitalised with an 
indefinite life, it is not amortised. The factors that contribute to the 
durability of brands capitalised are that there are no material legal, 
regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that 
limit the useful life of these intangible assets.

The Group carries out an annual impairment review of indefinite life 
brands as part of the review of the carrying value of goodwill, by 
performing a value-in-use calculation, using a discount factor based 
upon the Group’s pre-tax weighted average cost of capital.

Investments in subsidiary undertakings

Interests in subsidiary undertakings are accounted for at cost less any 
provision for impairment.

Where share-based payments are granted to the employees of 
subsidiary undertakings by the Company, they are treated as a capital 
contribution to the subsidiary and the Company’s investment in the 
subsidiary is increased accordingly.

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated 
depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Depreciation is 
provided to write-off the cost of the assets on a straight-line basis to 
their residual value over their estimated useful lives. Residual values 
and asset lives are reviewed annually.

Freehold properties are depreciated on a straight-line basis over 25 
years. Freehold land is not depreciated. Plant is depreciated on a 
straight-line basis over its expected useful life, which ranges from one 
to seven years.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. 
Cost comprises of direct materials, direct labour costs and those 
overheads that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their 
present location and condition. 

Land held for development, including land in the course of 
development, is initially recorded at discounted cost. Where, through 
deferred purchase credit terms, the carrying value differs from the 
amount that will ultimately be paid in settling the liability, this difference 
is charged as a finance cost in the Income Statement over the period 
of settlement.

Due to the scale of the Group’s developments, the Group has to allocate 
site-wide development costs between units built in the current year 
and in future years. It also has to estimate costs to complete on such 
developments. In making these assessments, there is a degree of 
inherent uncertainty. The Group has developed internal controls to 
assess and review carrying values and the appropriateness of 
estimates made.

Operating lease rentals are charged to the Income Statement in equal 
instalments over the life of the lease.

Leases as lessor

The Group enters into leasing arrangements with third parties 
following the completion of constructed developments until the date of 
the sale of the development to third parties. Rental income from these 
operating leases is recognised in the Income Statement on a straight-
line basis over the term of the lease. Initial direct costs incurred in 
negotiating and arranging an operating lease are added to the carrying 
amount of the leased asset and recognised in the Income Statement on 
a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Share-based payments

The Group issues equity-settled share-based payments to certain 
employees. In accordance with the transitional provisions, IFRS 2 ‘Share-
based Payments’ has been applied to all grants of equity instruments 
after 7 November 2002 that had not vested at 1 January 2005.

Equity-settled share-based payments are measured at the fair value of 
the equity instrument at the date of grant. Fair value is measured either 
using Black-Scholes, Present-Economic Value or Monte Carlo models 
depending on the characteristics of the scheme. The fair value is 
expensed in the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the 
vesting period, based on the Group’s estimate of shares that will 
eventually vest where non-market vesting conditions apply. 

Non-vesting conditions are taken into account in the estimate of the fair 
value of the equity instruments.

Tax

The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and 
deferred tax.

The tax currently payable is based on the taxable profit for the year. 
Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the Income 
Statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are 
taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that 
are never taxable or deductible. The Group’s liability for current tax is 
calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively 
enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is recognised in 
respect of all temporary differences that have originated but not been 
reversed at the balance sheet date where transactions or events that 
result in an obligation to pay more tax in the future or a right to pay less 
tax in the future have occurred at the balance sheet date.

Deferred tax is calculated at the rates that are expected to apply in the 
period when the liability is settled or the asset is realised, based on tax 
rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. 
Deferred tax is charged or credited in the Income Statement, except 
when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which 
case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity.

A net deferred tax asset is regarded as recoverable and therefore 
recognised only when, on the basis of all available evidence, it can be 
regarded as more likely than not that there will be suitable taxable 
profits from which the future reversal of the underlying timing 
differences can be deducted. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are 
offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set-off current tax 
assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to taxes 
levied by the same tax authority and the Group intends to settle its 
current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015115

Pensions

Available for sale financial assets

Secured loans
Non-interest bearing loans granted as part of sales transactions that 
are secured by way of a second legal charge on the respective property 
are classified as being available for sale and are stated at fair value. 
Fair value is determined in the manner described in note 17.

Revenue from transactions involving available for sale financial assets 
is recognised at the fair value of consideration receivable.

Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognised in 
equity within other comprehensive income. Gains and losses arising 
from impairment losses, changes in future cash flows and interest 
calculated using the ‘effective interest rate’ method are recognised 
directly in the Income Statement.

Residential property fund
Revenue from transactions involving available for sale financial assets 
is recognised at the fair value of consideration receivable. The fair value 
of consideration received is the initial fair value of the units received in 
the property fund.

Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value are recognised in 
equity within other comprehensive income. The fair value of this 
investment is calculated using the unadjusted quoted price of units in 
the property fund obtained from independent brokers.

Gains and losses arising from impairment losses and changes in 
future cash flows are recognised directly in the Income Statement.

Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables are financial assets with fixed or 
determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. 
They are included in current assets, except for those with maturities 
greater than twelve months after the balance sheet date, which are 
classified as non-current assets and are measured at amortised cost 
less an allowance for any uncollectable amounts. The net of these 
balances are classified as ‘trade and other receivables’ in the 
Balance Sheet. 

Trade and other receivables are classified as ‘loans and receivables’.

Defined contribution
The Group operates defined contribution pension schemes for certain 
employees. The Group’s contributions to the schemes are charged in 
the Income Statement in the year in which the contributions fall due.

Defined benefit
For the defined benefit scheme, the cost of providing benefits is 
determined using the Projected Unit Credit Method, with actuarial 
valuations being carried out at each balance sheet date. Actuarial gains 
and losses are recognised in full in the period in which they occur. 
They are recognised outside profit or loss and presented in the 
Statements of Comprehensive Income. Net-interest is calculated by 
applying a discount rate to the net defined benefit liability or asset.

Past service cost, until the scheme ceased to offer future accrual of 
defined benefit pensions to employees from 30 June 2009, was 
recognised immediately to the extent that the benefits were already 
vested, and otherwise was amortised on a straight-line basis over the 
average period until the benefits become vested.

The retirement benefit obligation recognised in the Balance Sheet 
represents the present value of the defined benefit obligation as 
adjusted for unrecognised past service cost, and as reduced by the fair 
value of the scheme assets. Any asset resulting from this calculation is 
limited to past service cost, plus the present value of available refunds 
and reductions in future contributions to the scheme.

Borrowing costs

The Group capitalises borrowing costs directly attributable to the 
acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset as part of 
the cost of the asset where developments are considered to fall under 
the requirements of IAS 23 ‘Borrowing costs’ (Revised). Otherwise, the 
Group expenses borrowing costs in the period to which they relate 
through the Income Statement.

Financial instruments

Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the Balance 
Sheet when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of 
the instrument.

The Group derecognises a financial asset only when the contractual 
rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or it transfers the 
financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership 
of the asset to another entity.

The Group derecognises a financial liability only when the Group’s 
obligations are discharged, cancelled or they expire.

Financial assets

Non-derivative financial assets are classified as either ‘available for 
sale financial assets’ or ‘loans and receivables’. The classification 
depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is 
determined at the time of initial recognition.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements116

Financial Statements – Accounting Policies continued

Impairment of financial assets

Trade and other payables

Trade and other receivables are assessed for indicators of impairment 
at each balance sheet date and are impaired where there is objective 
evidence that the recovery of the receivable is in doubt. 

Objective evidence of impairment could include significant financial 
difficulty of the customer, default on payment terms or the customer 
going into liquidation.

The carrying amount of trade and other receivables is reduced through 
the use of an allowance account. When a trade or other receivable is 
considered uncollectable, it is written off against the allowance account. 
Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited 
against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the 
allowance account are recognised in the Income Statement.

For financial assets classified as available for sale, a significant or 
prolonged decline in the value of the property underpinning the value of 
the loan or increased risk of default are considered to be objective 
evidence of impairment.

In respect of debt instruments classified as available for sale financial 
assets, increases in the fair value of assets previously subject to 
impairment, which can be objectively related to an event occurring 
after recognition of the impairment loss, are recognised in the Income 
Statement to the extent that they reverse the impairment loss. 

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and balances in bank 
accounts with no notice or less than three months’ notice from 
inception and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.

Cash and cash equivalents are classified as ‘loans and receivables’.

Financial liabilities and equity

Trade and other payables on normal terms are not interest bearing and 
are stated at amortised cost.

Trade and other payables on extended terms, particularly in respect of 
land, are recorded at their fair value at the date of acquisition of the 
asset to which they relate by discounting at prevailing market interest 
rates at the date of recognition. The discount to nominal value, which 
will be paid in settling the deferred purchase terms liability, is 
amortised over the period of the credit term and charged to finance 
costs using the ‘effective interest rate’ method.

Bank borrowings

Interest bearing bank loans and overdrafts are recorded at the 
proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.

Where bank agreements include a legal right of offset for in hand and 
overdraft balances, and the Group intends to settle the net outstanding 
position, the offset arrangements are applied to record the net position 
in the Balance Sheet.

Finance income and charges are accounted for using the ‘effective 
interest rate’ method in the Income Statement. 

Finance costs are recognised as an expense in the Income Statement 
in the period to which they relate.

Get Britain Building

The Group has received cash upon specific sites under the 
Government’s ‘Get Britain Building’ scheme, which is repayable in 
current and future periods as the sites to which it relates are 
developed. These loans are interest bearing and are recorded at the 
proceeds received plus accrued interest. These loans are included 
within loans and borrowings.

Financial liabilities and equity are classified according to the substance 
of the contractual arrangements entered into.

Finance costs are recognised as an expense in the Income Statement 
in the period to which they relate.

Equity instruments

Growing Places Fund

Equity instruments consist of the Company’s ordinary share capital and 
are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.

Financial liabilities

All non-derivative financial liabilities are classified as ‘other financial 
liabilities’ and are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction 
costs. Other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at 
amortised cost using the ‘effective interest rate’ method.

Other financial liabilities consist of bank borrowings and trade and 
other payables. 

Financial liabilities are classified as current liabilities unless the Group 
has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 
twelve months after the balance sheet date.

The Group has received cash under a local government ‘Growing 
Places Fund’ scheme which is repayable over four years in eight 
six-monthly instalments, the first of which was in December 2013. 
This loan is interest bearing and recorded at the proceeds received 
plus accrued interest less repayments to date. This loan is included 
within loans and borrowings. 

Finance costs are recognised as an expense in the Income Statement 
in the period to which they relate.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015117

Derivative financial instruments

Cash flow hedge

To the extent that the Group’s cash flow hedges are effective, gains and 
losses on the fair value of the interest rate and cross currency swap 
arrangements are deferred in equity in the hedging reserve until 
realised. On realisation, such gains and losses are recognised within 
finance charges in the Income Statement. 

To the extent that any hedge is ineffective, gains and losses on the fair 
value of these swap arrangements are recognised immediately in 
finance charges in the Income Statement.

Amounts deferred in equity are recycled in profit or loss in the periods 
when the hedged item is recognised in profit or loss. 

Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Group revokes the hedging 
relationship, the hedging instrument expires, is sold or terminated or 
no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. At that time, any cumulative 
gain or loss deferred in equity remains in equity and is recognised 
when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognised in profit or loss. 
When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the 
cumulative gain or loss that was deferred in equity is recognised 
immediately in profit or loss.

Government grants

Government grants are not recognised until there is reasonable 
assurance that the Group will comply with the conditions attaching to 
them and that the grants will be received. 

Government grants are recognised in the Income Statement so as to 
match with the related costs they are intended to compensate for. 
Grants related to income are included in the appropriate line within the 
Income Statement. Grants related to assets are deducted from the 
carrying amount of the asset. 

The Group has entered into derivative financial instruments in the form 
of interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps to manage the 
interest rate and foreign exchange rate risk arising from the Group’s 
operations and sources of finance. The use of financial derivatives is 
governed by the Group’s policies approved by the Board of Directors as 
detailed in notes 26 and 27 to the Financial Statements.

Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value at the date a derivative 
contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured to their fair 
value at each balance sheet date. The resulting gain or loss is 
recognised in the profit or loss immediately unless the derivative is 
designated and effective as a hedging instrument, in which event the 
timing of the recognition in profit or loss depends on the nature of the 
hedge relationship. 

The interest rate and cross currency swap arrangements are 
designated as hedging instruments, being either hedges of a change in 
future cash flows as a result of interest rate movements or hedges of a 
change in future cash flows as a result of foreign currency exchange 
rate movements. 

The fair value of hedging derivatives is classified as a non-current 
asset or a non-current liability if the remaining maturity of the hedging 
relationship is more than twelve months and as a current asset or a 
current liability if the remaining maturity of the hedge relationship is 
less than twelve months.

Hedge accounting

All of the Group’s interest rate and cross currency swaps are 
designated as cash flow hedges. At the inception of the hedge 
relationship, the Group documents the relationship between the 
hedging instrument and the hedged item, along with its risk 
management objectives and its strategy for undertaking various 
hedged transactions. In addition, at the inception of the hedge and on 
an ongoing basis, the Group documents whether the hedging 
instrument is highly effective in offsetting the changes in cash flows of 
the hedged items.

Details of the fair values of the interest rate and cross currency swaps 
are provided in notes 24, 25, 26 and 27 to the Financial Statements. 
Movements on the hedging reserve in equity are detailed in the 
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements118

Financial Statements
Impact of Standards and Interpretations  
in issue but not yet effective

At the date of approval of these Financial Statements, there were a 
number of standards, amendments and interpretations that have been 
published and are therefore mandatory for the Group’s accounting 
periods beginning on or after 1 July 2015 and later periods.

Amendments to IAS 19: ‘Defined Benefit Plans Employee 
Contributions’, Annual Improvements 2010-2012 and Annual 
Improvements 2011-2013 have been endorsed by the EU. 

Amendments to IAS 27 ‘Equity Method in Separate Financial 
Statements’, IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ as issued in 2009 and 
subsequently amended in 2010 and 2014, IFRS 14 ‘Regulatory Deferral 
Accounts’, IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’, 
Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41 ‘Bearer Plants’, Amendments to IAS 
16 and IAS 38 ‘Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and 
Amortisation’, Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 28 ‘Investment 
Entities’, Amendments to IFRS 11 ‘Accounting for Acquisitions of 
Interests in Joint Operations’, Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28 ‘Sale 
or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint 
Venture’, Disclosure Initiative (Amendments to IAS 1) and Annual 
Improvements 2012-2014 have not yet been endorsed by the EU. 
The Group has not early-adopted any standard, amendment 
or interpretation.

The standards, amendments and interpretations that are expected to 
have an impact upon the Group are: 

• 

• 

 IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ was reissued in October 2010 as 
the second step in the IASB project to replace IAS 39 ‘Financial 
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’. The final revision to 
the standard incorporating the impairment, classification and 
measurement requirements was issued by the IASB in July 2014. 
IFRS 9 will impact both the measurement and disclosures of 
financial instruments. The Group is currently assessing the 
impact of the revisions on the Group’s results and financial 
position, until such assessment is completed it is not practical to 
provide a reasonable estimate of the effect of IFRS 9. 

 IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’ was issued on 
28 May 2014. This standard sets out revenue recognition 
conditions for the Group and will be applicable from 1 July 2018. 
The standard remains subject to an exposure draft with proposed 
clarifications as well as being subject to industry interpretations 
and consensus. The Group has continued, but not yet completed, 
its assessment of the impact of the standard, as currently drafted, 
on the Group. To date, we expect the standard may delay the 
recognition of revenue from construction contracts, although this 
will not affect the Group’s cash flows. In addition, the standard is 
expected to require presentational changes to our Income 
Statement to show part exchange income and expenses 
separately, which are currently recognised on a net basis within 
cost of sales, as detailed in note 1. It is not practical to provide a 
reasonable estimate of the full impact of IFRS 15 until our 
assessment has been completed, which we expect to be within the 
year ended 30 June 2016, subject to the finalisation of the 
standard, and therefore we will provide further disclosures upon 
the impact of IFRS 15 in our Annual Report and Accounts 
next year. 

The adoption of the following standards, amendments and 
interpretations is not expected to have any material impact on the 
Financial Statements of the Group:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

 Amendment to IFRS 11 ‘Accounting for Acquisition of Interest in 
Joint Operations’. The amendment requires companies to apply 
IFRS ‘Business Combinations’ acquisition and disclosure 
requirements to investments in joint operations. The only 
exemption from this is if the formation of the joint operation 
coincides with the formation of the business.

 IFRS 14 ‘Regulatory Deferral Accounts’ has not yet been endorsed 
by the EU. This will not have an impact on the Group. 

 Amendments to IAS 27 ‘Equity Method in Separate Financial 
Statements’ reinstate the equity method as an accounting option 
for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates in an 
entity’s separate financial statements. These amendments have 
not yet been endorsed by the EU and are not expected to impact 
the Group.

 Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 28 ‘Investment Entities’ 
have not yet been endorsed by the EU. These amendments give 
guidance on exemptions from consolidating certain subsidiaries 
for investment entities and are not expected to impact the Group.

 Amendments to IAS 16 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ and IAS 
38 ‘Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and 
Amortisation’ has not yet been endorsed by the EU. None of these 
amendments are expected to impact the Group.

 Amendments to IAS 19 ‘Defined Benefit Plans: Employee 
Contributions’ will apply to the Group from 1 July 2015. 
This amendment is not expected to impact the Group.

 The Annual Improvements 2010-2012 and 2011-2013 Cycles 
includes amendments to a number of different accounting 
standards. These amendments will apply to the Group from 1 July 
2015. None of these amendments are expected to impact 
the Group.

 The Annual Improvements 2012-2014 have not yet been endorsed 
by the EU and are not expected to impact the Group.

 Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41 ‘Bearer Plants’ have not yet 
been endorsed by the EU and are not expected to impact 
the Group.

 Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28 ‘Sale or Contribution of Assets 
between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture’ have not 
yet been endorsed by the EU and are not expected to impact  
the Group.

• 

 Disclosure Initiative (Amendments to IAS 1) has not yet been 
endorsed by the EU and is not expected to impact the Group.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015119

Critical Accounting Judgements and  
Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty

Available for sale financial assets

The Group holds available for sale financial assets principally 
comprising interest free loans granted as part of sales transactions 
that are secured by way of a second legal charge on the respective 
property, which are held at fair value. The fair value calculation 
requires an estimate of the future cash flows expected from the 
redemption of interest free loans, including an estimate of the market 
value of the property at the estimated time of repayment, and requires 
the determination of a suitable discount rate to calculate the present 
value of the cash flows. The estimated market value is based on 
original selling prices and local market conditions with an allowance 
for low single-digit sales price inflation. The estimated repayment 
profile is based on historical data for first time buyers selling their 
property. The discount rate used is consistent with the interest rate 
payable on a third party second charge loan of a similar amount 
and duration. 

The interrelationship between these assumptions, particularly those 
related to estimated market value and estimated repayment profile, 
means that there is not a direct correlation between house price 
inflation and the valuation of the Group’s available for sale financial 
assets. During the year, the levels of house price inflation and 
redemptions have been in line with those expected in the fair value 
calculation. Accordingly, there has been no significant change in the 
Balance Sheet valuation due to the improved market. At 30 June 2015, 
the total asset recognised on the Balance Sheet in relation to these 
secured loans was £107.0m (2014: £122.4m), with the reduction 
primarily due to redemptions.

Goodwill and intangible assets impairment review

The impairment review for the goodwill of the housebuilding business 
and the Group’s indefinite life brand, David Wilson Homes, requires an 
estimation of the value-in-use of the housebuilding segment as defined 
in notes 10 and 11. The value-in-use calculation requires an estimate of 
the future cash flows expected from the housebuilding business, 
including the anticipated growth rate of revenue and costs, and 
requires the determination of a suitable discount rate to calculate the 
present value of the cash flows. The discount rate used is based on the 
average capital structure of the Group, current market assessments of 
the time value of money and risks appropriate to the Group’s 
housebuilding business. Changes in these may impact upon the 
Group’s discount rate in future periods. The carrying amount of 
goodwill at 30 June 2015 was £792.2m and the indefinite life brands 
was £100.0m, there was no impairment recognised during the year. 

In accordance with the requirements of IFRS, the Group has detailed 
below the critical accounting judgements made and the key sources of 
estimation uncertainty within these Financial Statements.

Critical accounting judgements

In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies, which are 
described in the accounting policies note, the Directors have made no 
individual judgements that have a significant impact upon the Financial 
Statements, apart from those involving estimations, which are dealt 
with below.

Key sources of estimation uncertainty

The key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of 
estimation uncertainty at the balance sheet dates, are discussed below.

Carrying value of land and work in progress 

The Group’s principal activity is housebuilding and commercial 
development. The majority of the development activity is not contracted 
prior to the development commencing. Accordingly, the Group has in 
its Balance Sheet at 30 June 2015 current assets that are not covered 
by a forward sale. The Group’s internal controls are designed to identify 
any developments where the Balance Sheet value of land and work in 
progress is more than the lower of cost or net realisable value.

During the year the Group has conducted six-monthly reviews of the 
net realisable value of specific sites identified as at high risk of 
impairment, based upon a number of criteria including low site profit 
margins and sites with no forecast completions. Where the estimated 
net realisable value of a site was less than its current carrying value 
within the Balance Sheet, the Group has impaired the land and work in 
progress value. 

During the year, due to performance variations and changes to viability 
on individual sites, there were gross impairment charges of £17.9m 
(2014: £31.3m) and gross impairment reversals of £6.2m, 
(2014: £22.4m) resulting in a net impairment charge of £11.7m 
(2014: £8.9m) included within profit from operations.

The key judgements in these reviews were estimating the realisable 
value of a site, which is determined by forecast sales rates, expected 
sales prices and estimated costs to complete. The estimation of future 
sales prices and costs to complete included allowances for low 
single-digit sales price inflation and low single-digit build costs 
inflation in future periods. During the year the Group continued to 
benefit from favourable market conditions. If the UK housing market 
were to change beyond management expectations in the future, in 
particular with regards to the assumptions around sales prices and 
estimated costs to complete, further adjustments to the carrying value 
of land and work in progress may be required.

The land held at the balance sheet date that has already been impaired 
is most sensitive to the judgements being applied and the potential for 
further impairment or reversal. Forecasting risk also increases in 
relation to those sites that are not expected to be realised in the short 
to medium term. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements120

Financial Statements – Critical Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty continued

Investment in joint venture holding non-current available for 
sale financial assets

Recognition of profit where developments are accounted for 
under IAS 11 ‘Construction Contracts’ 

The Group applies its policy on contract accounting when recognising 
revenue and profit on partially completed contracts. The application of 
this policy requires judgements to be made in respect of the total 
expected costs to complete for each site. The Group has in place 
established internal control processes to ensure that the evaluation of 
costs and revenues is based upon appropriate estimates.

Defined benefit pension scheme 

The Directors engage a qualified independent actuary to calculate the 
Group’s asset in respect of its defined benefit pension scheme. 
In calculating this asset, it is necessary for actuarial assumptions to be 
made, which include discount rates, salary and pension increases, 
price inflation, the long term rate of return upon scheme assets and 
mortality. As actual rates of increase and mortality may differ from 
those assumed, the pension asset may differ from that included in 
these Financial Statements.

The Group has obtained legal advice on the rights to the Group’s 
defined benefit pension scheme’s assets after the death of the last 
member. Based on this advice, the Group has concluded that it is 
appropriate to recognise an asset related to this scheme.

Hedge accounting

The majority of the Group’s facilities are floating rate, which exposes 
the Group to interest rate risk. The Group has in place £137.0m 
(2014: £137.0m) of floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps. The Group has 
adopted hedge accounting for these swaps on the basis that it is highly 
probable that there is sufficient forecast debt to match with the period 
of swaps. If this basis was not met in the future any changes in fair 
value of the swaps would be recognised in the Consolidated Income 
Statement, rather than in equity. During the year ended 30 June 2015, 
there was a gain of £2.4m (2014: £7.7m) included in equity related to 
these swaps. 

In addition, the Group has US$80.0m (2014: US$80.0m) of cross 
currency swaps to manage the cash flow risks related to foreign 
exchange, arising from the Group’s sources of US Dollar denominated 
finance. These swaps are designated as a cash flow hedge against 
future foreign exchange rate movements. If the hedges ceased to be 
highly effective, any changes in fair value of the swaps would be 
recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement, rather than equity. 
During the year ended 30 June 2015, there was a gain of £4.1m (2014: 
loss of £7.3m) included in equity related to these swaps.

The Group holds a joint venture investment of £25.6m (2014: £25.6m) in 
Rose Shared Equity LLP. This entity holds non-current available for 
sale financial assets comprising interest free loans that are secured by 
way of a second charge on the respective property. The Group’s 
investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. 
In line with the Group’s other joint venture investments, the carrying 
value is reviewed at each balance sheet date. This review requires 
estimation of the cash flows expected to be received by the Group 
which is based upon calculation of the fair values of the loans held by 
the entity including an estimate of future cash flows expected from the 
redemption of interest free loans, including an estimate of the market 
value of the property at the estimated time of redemption, and requires 
the determination of a suitable discount rate to calculate the present 
value of the cash flows. The estimated market value is based on 
original selling prices and local market conditions with an allowance 
for low single-digit sales price inflation. The estimated repayment 
profile is based on historic data for first time buyers selling their 
property. The discount rate used is consistent with the interest rate 
payable on a third party second charge loan of a similar amount 
and duration.

Classification of joint arrangements

The Group holds one joint venture investment not in equal share and 
one with more than one other party. However, in both cases, the Group 
has equal voting rights and control over the activities of the companies 
with the other parties, as explained in note 13. In addition, the Group 
and the other parties to the agreements only have rights to the net 
assets of these companies through the terms of the contractual 
arrangements. These entities are therefore classified as joint ventures 
and are accounted for by the equity method in the Consolidated 
Financial Statements.

The Group’s interests in a number of the entities classified as joint 
ventures are held indirectly. 

Barratt Wates (East Grinstead) No. 2 Limited is a wholly owned 
subsidiary of the Group’s joint venture, Barratt Wates (East Grinstead) 
Limited, and is therefore classified as a joint venture of the Group. 

Aldgate Land One Limited and Aldgate Land Two Limited are wholly 
owned subsidiaries of the Group’s joint venture, Aldgate Place (GP) 
Limited, and are therefore classified as joint ventures of the Group. 

BDWZest Developments LLP, Alie Street LLP, Queensland Road LLP, 
Fulham Wharf LLP and Nine Elms LLP form a group of limited liability 
partnerships jointly owned (directly or indirectly) by BDWZest LLP and 
ZestBDW LLP, both of which are joint ventures of the Group. All of these 
entities are therefore classified as joint ventures of the Group.

Estimation of costs to complete

In order to determine the profit that the Group is able to recognise on 
its developments in a specific period, the Group has to allocate 
site-wide development costs between units built in the current year 
and in future years. It also has to estimate costs to complete on such 
developments. In making these assessments there is a degree of 
inherent uncertainty. The Group has developed internal controls to 
assess and review carrying values and the appropriateness of 
estimates made. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015121

Notes to the Financial Statements

1. Revenue

An analysis of the Group’s revenue is as follows:

Sale of goods
Contract accounting revenue
Revenue as stated in the Consolidated Income Statement
Lease income
Finance income
Forfeit deposits
Other income
Total revenue

Notes

33
4

2015 
£m

3,515.4
244.1
3,759.5
1.0
7.6
0.9
34.7
3,803.7

2014 
£m

2,997.1
159.9
3,157.0
1.8
9.1
0.5
35.1
3,203.5

Sale of goods includes £333.6m (2014: £302.1m) of revenue generated where the sale has been achieved using part-exchange incentives. 

Proceeds received on the disposal of part-exchange properties, which are not included in revenue, were £179.7m (2014: £218.4m).

Other income principally comprises the sale of freehold reversions, ground rents and management fees receivable from JV’s.

2. Segmental analysis

The Group consists of two separate segments for management reporting and control purposes, being housebuilding and commercial developments. 
The segments are considered appropriate for reporting under IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’ since these segments are regularly reviewed internally by 
the Board without further significant categorisation. The Group presents its primary segment information on the basis of these operating segments. 
As the Group operates in a single geographic market, Great Britain, no secondary segmentation is provided.

Residential completions*
Consolidated Income Statement
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Administrative expenses 
Profit/(loss) from operations 
Share of post-tax profit/(loss) from joint ventures and associates 
Profit/(loss) from operations including post-tax profit/(loss) from 
joint ventures and associates
Finance income
Finance costs 
Profit before tax
Tax
Profit for the year from continuing operations

House- 
building

Commercial 
developments

Units

15,599
£m
3,702.3
(2,999.2)
703.1
(132.4)
570.7
45.9

Units

–
£m
57.2
(46.0)
11.2
(5.1)
6.1
(0.2)

616.6

5.9

2015 
Total

Units

15,599
£m
3,759.5
(3,045.2)
714.3
(137.5)
576.8
45.7

622.5
7.6
(64.6)
565.5
(115.2)
450.3

House- 
building

Commercial 
developments

Units

14,191
£m
3,142.6
(2,616.9)
525.7
(114.9)
410.8
40.7

451.5

Units

–
£m
14.4
(10.7)
3.7
(4.7)
(1.0)
(0.2)

(1.2)

2014 
Total

Units

14,191
£m
3,157.0
(2,627.6)
529.4
(119.6)
409.8
40.5

450.3
9.1
(68.8)
390.6
(85.2)
305.4

*  Residential completions exclude joint venture completions of 848 (2014: 647) in which the Group has an interest.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements122

2. Segmental analysis (continued)

Balance Sheet
Segment assets
Elimination of intercompany balances

Deferred tax assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Consolidated total assets
Segment liabilities
Elimination of intercompany balances

Loans and borrowings
Deferred tax liabilities
Current tax liabilities
Consolidated total liabilities

Other information
Capital additions
Depreciation

3. Profit from operations

Profit from operations is stated after charging/(crediting):

Staff costs
Government grants
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
Lease income
Operating lease charges 
– hire of plant, machinery and vehicles
– other

House- 
building 
£m

Commercial 
developments 
£m

5,511.5

50.1

(1,916.2)

(67.4)

£m
5.4
3.3

£m
–
–

2015 
Total 
£m

5,561.6
(10.9)
5,550.7
–
360.4
5,911.1
(1,983.6)
10.9
(1,972.7)
(176.5)
(1.2)
(49.4)
(2,199.8)

£m
5.4
3.3

House- 
building 
£m

Commercial 
developments 
£m

4,833.4

51.0

(1,561.5)

(53.4)

£m
4.7
2.0

£m
–
–

Notes

8

12
33

2015 
£m

353.0
(4.1)
3.3
(1.0)

32.6
16.8

2014 
Total 
£m

4,884.4
(34.4)
4,850.0
19.6
274.7
5,144.3
(1,614.9)
34.4
(1,580.5)
(200.1)
–
(9.7)
(1,790.3)

£m
4.7
2.0

2014 
£m

308.6
(1.2)
2.0
(1.8)

27.0
16.1

Government grants of £2.3m (2014: £0.1m) were received in the year relating to Government initiatives including the National Affordable Housing 
Programme and the Affordable Homes Programme. Grant income of £4.1m (2014: £1.2m) was recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement in 
relation to house sales completed under these initiatives.

Administrative expenses of £137.5m (2014: £119.6m) include sundry income of £35.6m (2014: £35.6m) which is disclosed within other revenue in 
note 1.

Profit from operations is stated after charging the Directors’ emoluments disclosed in the Remuneration Report on page 84 and in note 8.

The Group does not recognise income from supplier rebates until received from suppliers. During the year £22.2m (2014: £21.8m) of supplier 
rebate income was included within profit from operations.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued123

3. Profit from operations (continued)

The remuneration paid to Deloitte LLP, the Group’s principal auditor, is disclosed below:

Auditor’s remuneration
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor for the audit of the Parent Company and Consolidated Financial Statements
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor for the audit of the Company’s subsidiaries 
Total audit fees
Audit-related assurance services
Taxation compliance services
Other taxation advisory services
Corporate finance services
Other services
Total fees for other services
Total fees related to the Company and its subsidiaries

2015 
£000

2014 
£000

69
260
329
50
96
27
–
60
233
562

70
265
335
62
98
62
60
8
290
625

Details of the Group’s policy on the use of the auditor for non-audit services, the reasons why the auditor was used rather than another supplier 
and how the auditor’s independence and objectivity was safeguarded are set out in the Audit Committee Report on pages 71 and 72. No services 
were provided pursuant to contingent fee arrangements.

Audit-related assurance services comprise the review of the interim report. Corporate finance services related to property advice. Other taxation 
advisory services comprise advice on land acquisitions and disposals; and other transactions in the normal course of trading.

In addition to the remuneration paid to the Group’s principal auditor, Deloitte LLP, for services related to the Company and its subsidiaries, 
Deloitte LLP received the following remuneration from joint ventures in which the Group participates:

The audit of the Group’s joint ventures pursuant to legislation
Other services
Total fees related to joint ventures

4. Net finance costs

Recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement:

Finance income on short term bank deposits
Imputed interest on available for sale financial assets
Finance income related to employee benefits
Other interest receivable
Finance income
Interest on loans and borrowings
Imputed interest on deferred term payables
Finance costs related to employee benefits
Amounts reclassified to the Income Statement in respect of hedged cash flows
Foreign exchange losses/(gains) on US Dollar debt
Amortisation of facility fees
Other interest payable
Finance costs
Net finance costs

Recognised in equity:

Amounts deferred in respect of effective cash flow hedges
Total fair value losses on cash flow swaps included in equity

Amounts reclassified to the Income Statement in respect of hedged cash flows
Total fair value gains on cash flow swaps transferred from equity

2015 
£000

130
20
150

2015 
£m

(0.1)
(4.6)
(0.4)
(2.5)
(7.6)
19.1
31.6
–
2.9
4.1
3.0
3.9
64.6
57.0

2015 
£m

0.5
0.5

(2.9)
(2.9)

2014 
£000

108
16
124

2014 
£m

(0.2)
(5.8)
–
(3.1)
(9.1)
21.3
35.0
0.3
11.7
(5.9)
3.5
2.9
68.8
59.7

2014 
£m

5.4
5.4

(11.7)
(11.7) 

Notes

17
28

28
31
5

Notes

31

31

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements124

5. Financial instruments gains and losses

The net (gains)/losses recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement, in respect of financial instruments (excluding interest shown in note 4), 
were as follows:

Loans and receivables
Impairment of trade receivables
Available for sale financial assets
Net profit transferred on sale
Net impairment/(reversal) of available for sale financial assets
Other financial liabilities
Foreign exchange losses/(gains) on US Dollar debt
Transfers from hedged items
Transfer from equity on currency cash flow hedges

6. Tax

Analysis of the tax charge for the year

Current tax
UK corporation tax for the year
Adjustment in respect of previous years

Deferred tax
Origination and reversal of temporary differences
Adjustment in respect of previous years
Impact of reduction in corporation tax rate

Tax charge for the year

Notes

2015  
£m

2014  
£m

20

17

4

31

Notes

18

2.6

(9.9)
8.5

4.1

(4.1)

2015  
£m

102.9
(8.3)
94.6

13.3
7.3
– 
20.6
115.2

2.6

(2.4)
(2.8)

(5.9)

5.9

2014  
£m

13.6
0.6
14.2

69.8
(0.7)
1.9
71.0
85.2

In addition to the amount charged to the Consolidated Income Statement, a net current and deferred tax credit of £12.0m (2014: £1.9m) was 
recognised directly in equity. 

All profits of the Group are subject to UK corporation tax.

Factors affecting the tax charge for the year
The tax rate assessed for the year is lower (2014: lower) than the standard effective rate of corporation tax in the UK of 20.75% (2014: 22.50%).

The differences are explained below:

Profit before tax
Profit before tax multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax of 20.75% (2014: 22.50%)
Effects of:
Other items including non-deductible expenses
Use of previously unrecognised losses
Additional tax relief for land remediation costs
Adjustment in respect of previous years
Tax in respect of joint ventures
Impact of change in tax rate on deferred tax asset
Tax charge for the year

2015  
£m
565.5
117.3

1.0
–
(1.3)
(1.0)
(0.8)
–
115.2

2014  
£m
390.6
87.9

1.3
(3.2)
(1.5)
(0.1)
(1.1)
1.9
85.2

As set out in the Finance Act 2013, the main rate of corporation tax reduced from 21% to 20% on 1 April 2015. Accordingly, the current year tax charge 
has been provided for at an effective rate of 20.75% (2014: 22.50%) and the closing deferred tax asset has been provided in these Financial Statements 
at a rate of 20% (2014: between 20% and 21% depending upon when the asset was expected to reverse). 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued125

6. Tax (continued)

In the July 2015 Summer Budget the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced the intention to reduce the main rate of corporation tax from 20% to 19% 
with effect from 1 April 2017 and from 19% to 18% with effect from 1 April 2020. These changes had not been substantively enacted at the balance 
sheet date and, therefore, are not included in these Financial Statements. Had these changes been enacted prior to the balance sheet date, there 
would be no significant impact on the deferred tax liability disclosed within these Financial Statements.

7. Dividends

Amounts recognised as distributions to equity shareholders in the period:
Final dividend for the year ended 30 June 2014 of 7.1p (2013: 2.5p) per share
Interim dividend for the year ended 30 June 2015 of 4.8p (2014: 3.2p) per share
Total dividends distributed to equity shareholders in the year

Proposed final dividend for the year ended 30 June 2015 of 10.3p (2014: 7.1p) per share

2015  
£m

70.2
47.5
117.7

2015  
£m

102.3

2014  
£m

24.5
31.4
55.9

2014  
£m

69.7

The proposed final dividend is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. The cost has been calculated based on the issued 
share capital at 30 June 2015 and has not been included as a liability at 30 June 2015.

In addition a special cash payment of £100.0m equivalent to 10.0 pence per share is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General 
Meeting. The cost has been calculated based on the issued share capital at 30 June 2015 and has not been included as a liability at 30 June 2015.

8. Key management and employees

Key management personnel, as defined under IAS 24 ‘Related Party Disclosures’, have been identified as the Board of Directors, as the controls 
operated by the Group ensure that all key decisions are reserved for the Board. Detailed disclosures of Directors’ individual remuneration, pension 
entitlements and share options, for those Directors who served during the year, are given in the audited sections of the Remuneration Report on  
pages 75 to 95, which form part of these Financial Statements. A summary of key management remuneration is as follows:

Salaries and fees (including pension compensation)
Social security costs1
Performance bonus
Benefits
Share-based payments2

1  Excluded from the Executive Directors and Non-Executive Directors single figure of remuneration tables on page 84.

2  IFRS 2 ‘Share-Based Payment’ charge attributable to key management.

Housebuilding – average staff numbers (excluding subcontractors, including Directors)
Commercial developments – average staff numbers (excluding subcontractors, including Directors)

Wages and salaries including bonuses (including Directors)
Redundancy costs
Social security costs
Other pension costs
Share-based payments
Total staff costs

Notes

28
30
3

2015  
£m

289.0
1.7
42.6
8.1
11.6
353.0

Group

2014  
£m

259.5
0.2
32.1
7.8
9.0
308.6

Staff costs for the Company in both years are stated after the recharge of staff to other Group companies.

2015  
£m

2.6
2.8
2.3
0.1
3.4
11.2

2015  
Number

5,952
25

2015  
£m

7.1
–
2.6
0.1
3.4
13.2

2014  
£m

2.5
1.7
2.3
0.1
2.6
9.2

Group

 2014  
Number

5,337
28

Company

2014  
£m

6.8
–
1.9
0.1
2.7
11.5

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements126

9. Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit for the year attributable to ordinary shareholders of £449.4m (2014: £305.4m) by the 
weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, excluding those held by the Employee Benefit Trust which are treated as 
cancelled, which was 987.2m (2014: 979.1m) shares.

Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit for the year attributable to ordinary shareholders of £449.4m (2014: £305.4m) by the 
weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue adjusted to assume conversion of all potentially dilutive share options from the start of the 
year, giving a figure of 1,008.4m (2014: 1,004.7m) shares. 

The earnings per share from continuing operations were as follows:

Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share

10. Goodwill

Cost
At 1 July 2013, 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2015
Accumulated impairment losses
At 1 July 2013, 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2015
Carrying amount
At 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2015

2015  
pence

45.5
44.6

2014  
pence

31.2
30.4

Group  
£m

816.7

24.5

792.2

The Group’s goodwill has a carrying value of £792.2m relating to the housebuilding segment. The goodwill relating to the commercial 
developments segment, with a cost of £24.5m, was fully impaired in the year ended 30 June 2008.

The Group conducts an annual impairment review of goodwill and intangibles together for both the housebuilding and commercial developments 
segments. The impairment review was performed at 30 June 2015 and compared the value-in-use of the housebuilding segment with the carrying 
value of its tangible and intangible assets and allocated goodwill. The Group allocates any identified impairment first to goodwill and then to 
assets on a pro-rata basis, which in the case of the Group is its intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.

The value-in-use was determined by discounting the expected future cash flows of the housebuilding segment. The first two years of cash flows 
were determined using the Group’s approved detailed site-by-site business plan. The cash flows for the third to fifth years were determined using 
Group level internal forecasted cash flows based upon expected volumes, selling prices and margins, taking into account available land 
purchases and work in progress levels. The cash flows for year six onwards were extrapolated in perpetuity using an estimated growth rate of 
2.5%, which was based upon the expected long term growth rate of the UK economy. 

The key assumptions for the value-in-use calculations were:

• 

• 

• 

• 

 Discount rate: this is a pre-tax rate reflecting current market assessments of the time value of money and risks appropriate to the Group’s 
housebuilding business. Accordingly, the rate of 14.0% (2014: 12.6%) is considered by the Directors to be the appropriate pre-tax risk 
adjusted discount rate, being the Group’s estimated long term pre-tax weighted average cost of capital. The rate used in the 30 June 2015 
impairment review is calculated using the average capital structure of the Group during the financial year, consistent with the prior year, 
due to the cyclicality of the Group’s borrowing requirements and reflects the Group’s reduced borrowing costs following the comprehensive 
refinancing completed during the prior year. 

 Expected changes in selling prices for completed houses and the related impact upon operating margin: these are determined on a 
site-by-site basis for the first two years dependent upon local market conditions and product type. For years three to five, these have been 
estimated at a Group level based upon past experience and expectations of future changes in the market, taking into account external 
market forecasts.

 Sales volumes: these are determined on a site-by-site basis for the first two years dependent upon local market conditions, land availability 
and planning permissions. For years three to five, these have been estimated at a Group level based upon past experience and expectations 
of future changes in the market, taking into account external market forecasts.

 Expected changes in site costs to complete: these are determined on a site-by-site basis for the first two years dependent upon the 
expected costs of completing all aspects of each individual development. For years three to five, these have been estimated at a Group level 
based upon past experience and expectations of future changes in the market, taking into account external market forecasts.

The conclusion of this impairment review was that given the current position of the housebuilding segment and the expectations as to its future 
performance based upon current forecasts for sales volumes and expected changes in both selling prices and costs to complete, the 
housebuilding segment’s goodwill and intangible assets were not impaired. The recoverable value of goodwill and intangible assets exceeded its 
carrying value by £1,547.4m (2014: £1,213.2m). 

If the UK housing market and expectations regarding its future were to deteriorate with either operating margins reducing by 4.5% per annum 
(2014: 3.3% per annum) or the appropriate discount rate were to increase by 4.3% (2014: 2.9%) and all other variables were held constant, then the 
recoverable value of goodwill and intangible assets would equal its carrying value. Further information is given in Critical Accounting Judgements 
and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty on page 119.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued127

11. Other intangible assets

Cost
At 1 July 2013, 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2015
Amortisation
At 1 July 2013, 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2015
Carrying amount
At 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2015

Group

 Brands  
£m

107.0 

7.0 

100.0

Brands
The Group does not amortise the housebuilding brand acquired with Wilson Bowden, being David Wilson Homes, valued at £100.0m, as the 
Directors consider that this brand has an indefinite useful economic life due to the fact that the Group intends to hold and support the brand for an 
indefinite period and there are no factors that would prevent it from doing so.

The Group tests indefinite life brands annually for impairment, or more frequently if there are indications that they might be impaired. At 30 June 
2015, an impairment review was conducted using the calculations and assumptions as explained in note 10. The conclusion of this impairment 
review was that the Group’s David Wilson Homes brand was not impaired.

The brand of Wilson Bowden Developments (valued at £7.0m prior to amortisation) was being amortised over ten years as it is a business-to-
business brand operating in niche markets. Following an impairment review at 30 June 2008, the Wilson Bowden Developments brand was 
fully impaired. 

Further information is given in Critical Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty on page 119.

12. Property, plant and equipment

Cost
At 1 July 2013
Additions
Disposals
At 30 June 2014
Additions
Disposals
At 30 June 2015
Depreciation
At 1 July 2013
Charge for the year
Disposals
At 30 June 2014
Charge for the year
Disposals
At 30 June 2015
Net book value
At 30 June 2014
At 30 June 2015

Group

Property  
£m

Plant and 
equipment  
£m

Total  
£m

Property 
£m

Plant and 
equipment  
£m

Company

Total 
£m

3.4
0.1
(0.7)
2.8
–
–
2.8

3.2
0.1
(0.7) 
2.6
0.1
–
2.7

0.2
0.1

13.5
4.6
(2.2)
15.9
5.4
(0.7)
20.6

10.3
1.9
(2.2)
10.0
3.2
(0.7)
12.5

5.9
8.1

16.9
4.7
(2.9)
18.7
5.4
(0.7)
23.4

13.5
2.0
(2.9)
12.6
3.3
(0.7)
15.2

6.1
8.2

0.9
–
(0.7)
0.2
–
–
0.2

0.9
– 
(0.7) 
0.2
–
–
0.2

–
–

6.2
2.3
(2.0) 
6.5
2.8
–
9.3

5.3
0.9
(2.0) 
4.2
1.3
–
5.5

2.3
3.8

7.1
2.3
(2.7) 
6.7
2.8
–
9.5

6.2
0.9
(2.7) 
4.4
1.3
–
5.7

2.3
3.8

Authorised future capital expenditure that was contracted but not provided for in these Financial Statements amounted to £0.5m (2014: £0.4m).

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements128

13. Investments in joint ventures and associates

During the year, the Group entered into a new joint venture arrangement: Infinity Park Derby LLP.

The Group equity accounts for jointly controlled entities. The Group has interests in the following jointly controlled entities:

Joint venture
Barratt Wates (Horley) Limited1
Ravenscraig Limited2
DWH/Wates (Thame) Limited
Barratt Metropolitan LLP
Wandsworth Parkside LLP
Alie Street LLP3
Queensland Road LLP3
Barratt Wates (East Grinstead) Limited
Barratt Wates (East Grinstead) No.2 Limited4
Barratt Osborne Worthing LLP
Barratt Osborne Bexley LLP
The Aldgate Place Limited Partnership
Aldgate Place (GP) Limited
Fulham Wharf LLP3
Barratt Wates (Worthing) Limited
BK Scotswood LLP
Rose Shared Equity LLP
Enderby Wharf LLP
Nine Elms LLP3
Brooklands Milton Keynes LLP
Sovereign BDW (Newbury) LLP
BDWZest Developments LLP3
BDWZest LLP
ZestBDW LLP
Barratt Wates (Lindfield) Limited
Infinity Park Derby LLP
Old Sarum Park Properties Limited
Aldgate Land One Limited5
Aldgate Land Two Limited5

Percentage 
owned

Voting rights  
controlled

Country of registration

Principal  
place of 
business

78.5% 
33.3%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%

50.0%
33.3%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%

England and Wales
Scotland
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales
England and Wales

UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK
UK

Principal activity

Housebuilding
Commercial development
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Holding company
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Holding company
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Holding company
Investment entity
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Holding company
Holding company
Holding company
Housebuilding
Commercial development
Dormant
Dormant
Dormant

1   Barratt Wates (Horley) Limited is classified as a joint venture as the Group has equal control with one other joint venture partner (see ‘Classification of joint arrangements’ 

on page 120).

2   Ravenscraig Limited is classified as a joint venture as the Group has equal control and ownership percentages with two joint venture partners (see ‘Classification of joint 

arrangements’ on page 120).

3   Investments in these joint ventures are held indirectly through BDWZest LLP and ZestBDW LLP (see ‘Classification of joint arrangements’ on page 120). 

4  Barratt Wates (East Grinstead) No.2 Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Barratt Wates (East Grinstead) Limited (see ‘Classification of joint arrangements’ on page 120). 

5  These companies are wholly owned subsidiaries of Aldgate Place (GP) Limited which is a 50% joint venture of the Group.

A number of the Group’s joint ventures prepare financial statements which are non-coterminous with the Group in order to comply with the terms 
of their joint venture agreements and to align with the year ends of our joint venture partners. Wandsworth Parkside LLP, Alie Street LLP, Fulham 
Wharf LLP, Queensland Road LLP, Nine Elms LLP, BDWZest Developments LLP, BDWZest LLP and ZestBDW LLP prepare financial statements 
to 31 March. Barratt Osborne Bexley LLP prepares financial statements to 30 September and Barratt Osborne Worthing LLP prepares financial 
statements to 30 April. BK Scotswood LLP prepares financial statements to 31 December. Management financial information is available for all 
joint ventures with non-coterminous year ends as at 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2014. 

The Group equity accounts for investments in associates. The Group has significant interests in the following associates:

Associate

Percentage owned

New Tyne West Development Company LLP

25.0%

Country of registration

England and Wales

Principal activity

Housebuilding

New Tyne West Development Company LLP prepares financial statements to 31 December, which is non-coterminous with the Group, as agreed 
between the partners at the inception of the joint arrangement. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued129

13. Investments in joint ventures and associates (continued)

There are no losses in any of the Group’s joint ventures or associates which have not been recognised by the Group. 

The transfer of funds from the Group’s joint ventures and associates to the Group is determined by the terms of the joint venture agreements, 
which specify how available funds should be applied in repaying loans and capital, and distributing profits to the partners. The joint venture 
agreement entered into in respect of Rose Shared Equity LLP provides for the return of the capital invested by our joint venture partner before any 
funds can be transferred to the Group. As at 30 June 2015 £24.6m has been repaid with £9.4m outstanding. In addition BDWZest Developments 
LLP has an external loan arrangement, the covenants and terms of which restrict the transfer of funds from it and its subsidiaries (Alie Street 
LLP, Queensland Road LLP, Fulham Wharf LLP and Nine Elms LLP) which are guarantors, to the Group. The terms of the agreement are such 
that the members capital invested must at least match the external loan balance, limiting repayments of capital to the Group. 

Joint ventures and associates

At 1 July
Net (decrease)/increase in investments in joint ventures
Dividends received from joint ventures
Share of post-tax profit for the year from joint ventures
Share of post-tax profit/(loss) for the year from associates
At 30 June

Joint ventures
Summarised financial information relating to these joint ventures is as follows:

2015  
£m

199.6
(18.3)
(27.0)
45.4
0.3
200.0

Group

2014  
£m

123.5
59.2
(23.6)
40.6
(0.1)
199.6

2015  
£m

25.6
–
–
–
–
25.6

Company

2014  
£m

25.8
(0.2)
–
–
–
25.6

Queensland Road LLP

Fulham Wharf LLP

Nine Elms LLP Enderby Wharf LLP Other joint ventures

Group Total

Income
Expenditure

Tax
Profit/(loss) for the year, being 
total comprehensive income/
(expense)
Group share of profit/(loss) 
for the year recognised in the 
Consolidated Income 
Statement
Dividends received from joint 
ventures in the year
Current asset
Non-current assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Net assets/(liabilities) of joint 
ventures
Group share of net assets/
(liabilities) recognised in the 
Consolidated Balance Sheet 
at 30 June

2015  
£m

84.6
(55.8)
28.8
–

2014  
£m

87.1
(58.7)
28.4
–

2015  
£m

126.6
(98.3)
28.3
–

2014  
£m

37.2
(27.1)
10.1
–

2015  
£m

7.5
(8.3)
(0.8)
–

2014  
£m

–
(1.0)
(1.0)
–

2015  
£m

22.2
(19.2)
3.0
–

2014  
£m

–
(0.5)
(0.5)
–

2015  
£m

186.3
(152.6)
33.7
(2.9)

2014  
£m

201.8
(145.5)
56.3
(2.3)

2015  
£m

427.2
(334.2)
93.0
(2.9)

2014  
£m

326.1
(232.8)
93.3
(2.3)

28.8

28.4

28.3

10.1

(0.8)

(1.0)

3.0

(0.5)

30.8

41.6

90.1

78.6

14.4

14.2

14.1

5.0

(0.4)

(0.5)

1.5

(0.2)

15.8

22.1

45.4

40.6

27.0
19.6
–
(18.2)
–

–
44.8
–
(18.5)
(0.1)

–
186.1
–
(47.7)
(64.3)

–
178.0
–
(94.5)
(73.2)

–
176.0
–
(70.5)
(82.3)

–
119.9
–
(42.8)
(78.1)

–
95.1
0.4
(29.5)
(23.5)

–
53.7
–
(14.2)
–

–
311.5
61.1
(136.9)
(151.5)

23.6
400.8
54.6
(179.5)
(274.3)

27.0
788.3
61.5
(302.8)
(321.6)

23.6
797.2
54.6
(349.5)
(425.7)

1.4

26.2

74.1

10.3

23.2

(1.0)

42.5

39.5

84.2

1.6

225.4

76.6

0.7

13.1

37.1

5.2

11.6

(0.5)

21.3

19.8

50.5

6.2

121.2

43.8

The Group has made loans of £87.6m (2014: £164.6m) to its joint ventures, which are included within Group investments accounted for using the 
equity method. Included within the Group’s share of net assets of joint ventures is a proportion of net loans to the joint ventures calculated using 
the Group’s ownership share of £85.7m (2014: £160.4m). 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements130

13. Investments in joint ventures and associates (continued)

The Company has an investment in one joint venture, Rose Shared Equity LLP. Summarised financial information relating to Rose Shared Equity 
LLP is as follows:

Income
Expenditure

Tax
Profit for the year, being total comprehensive income
Group share of profit for the year recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement
Dividends received from joint ventures in the year
Current assets
Non-current assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Net assets of joint venture 
Group share of net assets recognised in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at 30 June 

Company Total

2015  
£m

27.4
(24.3)
3.1
–
3.1
–
–
1.6
49.1
(0.1)
–
50.6
25.6

2014  
£m

13.3
(0.9)
12.4
–
12.4
–
–
1.4
49.9
(3.2)
–
48.1
25.6

During the year, the Group and Company entered into a number of transactions with their joint ventures in respect of funding and development 
management services (with charges made based on the utilisation of these services) in addition to the provision of construction services. 
Further details on these transactions are provided in note 35. The Group and Company have a number of contingent liabilities relating to their joint 
ventures. Further details on these are provided in note 34.

Associates
In relation to the Group’s interests in associates, the Group’s share of assets and liabilities of the associates is an asset of £0.1m at 30 June 2015 
(2014: liability of £0.3m). The Group’s share of the associate’s profit during the year was £0.3m (2014: loss of £0.1m).

The Group has made loans of £nil (2014: £nil) to its associates, which are included within the Group investments accounted for using the equity 
method. Further details of transactions with associates are provided in note 35.

The Group has contingent liabilities relating to its associates. Further details on these are provided in note 34.

14. Jointly controlled operations 

The Group’s share of profits and losses from its investments in jointly controlled operations is accounted for on a direct basis and is included in the 
Income Statement. The Group’s share of its investments, assets and liabilities is accounted for on a directly proportional basis in the Group’s 
Balance Sheet. The Company has no jointly controlled operations (2014: none).

The Group has significant interests in the following jointly controlled operations:

Joint operation

Barrier Park East
Lawley House
Trenchard House

Share of profits and assets consolidated Principal place of business

50.0%
50.0%
50.0%

UK
UK
UK

Principal activity

Housebuilding
Housebuilding
Housebuilding

The Group’s share of the joint operations’ income and expenses, included in the Consolidated Income Statement during the year and the assets 
and liabilities of the joint operations which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet are shown below:

Group share of:
Income
Expenses
Share of profit from joint operations
Group share of:
Current assets
Non-current assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Share of net assets of joint operations

2015  
£m

24.7
(16.5)
8.2

43.0
0.2
(20.7)
–
22.5

Group

 2014  
£m

17.1 
(13.4)
3.7

34.1
0.2
(10.9)
(9.1)
14.3

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued131

15. Investments

Cost
At 1 July
Increase in investment in subsidiaries
Increase in investment in subsidiaries related to share-based payments
At 30 June
Impairment
At 1 July
Impairment of investments in subsidiaries
At 30 June
Net book value
At 1 July
At 30 June

2015  
£m

Company

 2014  
£m

3,171.0
–
6.0
3,177.0

60.5
18.7
79.2

3,170.9
–
0.1
3,171.0

60.5
–
60.5

3,110.5
3,097.8

3,110.4
3,110.5

During the year the Company received dividends totalling £19.9m from its subsidiary undertakings. Following receipt of these dividends the value 
of the investment in subsidiaries was revised to reflect the reduction in the net assets of the subsidiary undertakings.

The subsidiary undertakings that principally affected profits and net assets of the Group were:

Subsidiary

Percentage owned

Country of registration

Principal activity

BDW Trading Limited 
BDW North Scotland Limited
David Wilson Homes Limited
Wilson Bowden Developments Limited

100%
100%
100%*
100%*

*  Owned through another Group company.

England and Wales
Scotland
England and Wales
England and Wales

Housebuilding and development
Housebuilding and development
Housebuilding and development
Commercial development

A full list of the subsidiary undertakings of the Group and Company is included in note 36.

16. Non-controlling interests

At 30 June 2015 the following subsidiaries of the Group had non-controlling interests:

Subsidiary

SQ Holdings Limited
The Tin Hat Regeneration Partnership LLP
The 1249 Regeneration Partnership LLP

*  Subject to UK corporation tax (see note 6)

Percentage owned

Voting rights 
controlled

Country of 
 registration

Principal place  
of business

Principal activity

90.0% 
90.0%
90.0%

90.0%
50.0%
50.0%

Guernsey *
UK
England and Wales UK
England and Wales UK

Housebuilding
Commercial development
Commercial development

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements132

16. Non-controlling interests (continued)

Summarised financial information relating to these subsidiaries:

Income
Expenditure

Tax
Profit/(loss) for the year, being total 
comprehensive income for the year
Profit/(loss) for the year 
attributable to the Group
Profit for the year attributable to 
the non-controlling interests
Current assets
Non-current assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Net assets/(liabilities)
Equity attributable to the Group
Non-controlling interests
Dividends paid to non-controlling 
interests
Net cash inflow from operating 
activities
Net cash outflow from financing 
activities
Net cash inflow 

SQ Holdings Limited

The Tin Hat Regeneration 
Partnership LLP

The 1249 Regeneration 
Partnership LLP

2015  
£m

–
(0.8)
(0.8)
0.2

(0.6)

(0.6)

–
118.5
–
(9.4)
(0.3)
108.8
100.8
8.0

–

0.1

–
0.1

2014  
£m

–
–
–
–

–

–

–
109.9
–
(0.5)
–
109.4
101.4
8.0

–

–

–
–

2015  
£m

34.9
(30.0)
4.9
–

4.9

4.0

0.9
23.3
–
(18.4)
–
4.9
4.0
0.9

–

10.3

–
10.3

2014  
£m

2015  
£m

–
–
–
–

–

–

–
3.8
–
(3.8)
–
–
–
–

–

5.7

(3.2)
2.5

–
2.9
2.9
–

2.9

2.9

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

–

–

–
–

2014  
£m

–
(0.2)
(0.2)
–

(0.2)

(0.2)

–
1.4
–
(4.3)
–
(2.9)
(2.9)
–

–

–

–
–

Movement in non-controlling interest share of net assets recognised in the Consolidated Balance Sheet 

At 1 July
Share of profit for the year recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement
Non-controlling interest arising on acquisition of land in a non-wholly controlled subsidiary
At 30 June

2015  
£m

34.9
(27.9)
7.0
0.2

7.2

6.3

0.9
141.8
–
(27.8)
(0.3)
113.7
104.8
8.9

–

10.4

–
10.4

2015  
£m 

8.0
0.9
–
8.9

Total

 2014  
£m

–
(0.2)
(0.2)
–

(0.2)

(0.2)

–
115.1
–
(8.6)
–
106.5
98.5
8.0

–

5.7

(3.2)
2.5

Group

 2014  
£m

–
–
8.0
8.0

There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Group to access or use assets and settle liabilities. Detailed arrangements for each 
subsidiary are laid out in the relevant purchase agreements.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued133

17. Available for sale financial assets

Secured loans

At 1 July
Additions
Disposals 
Imputed interest
Other provision movements
Fair value adjustment taken through other comprehensive income
At 30 June

Balance at 30 June analysed as:
Current
Non-current

Notes

4

2015  
£m

122.4
1.2
(29.6)
4.6
3.3
5.1
107.0

10.2
96.8

Group

 2014  
£m

128.4
1.2
(16.5)
5.8
2.8
0.7
122.4

0.8
121.6

Available for sale financial assets principally comprise interest free loans that are granted as part of sales transactions and for which the cash 
flows receivable are based on the value of the property at redemption. These loans are secured by way of a second legal charge on the respective 
property (after the first mortgage charge). These loans are held at the present value of expected future cash flows, taking into account the 
estimated market value of the property at the estimated time of repayment. The Consolidated Income Statement includes a net impairment 
charge of £8.5m and a profit on disposal of £9.9m (2014: impairment reversal of £2.8m and profit on disposal of £2.4m) in cost of sales (note 5).

The present value of expected future cash flows is calculated using a discount rate consistent with the interest rate payable on a third party 
second charge loan of a similar amount and duration. This is considered to be the most appropriate rate as the interest free loans are similar in 
nature to second charge loans offered by third party financial institutions. The average discount rate used for the year ended 30 June 2015 was 
7.5% (2014: 8.0%). A fair value adjustment credit of £5.1m (2014: £0.7m) has been taken through other comprehensive income reflecting the 
unwinding of the discount in the year.

The estimated fair value is based on original selling prices and local market conditions with an allowance for low single-digit sales price inflation. 
The Group has also used independent valuation specialists in prior years to review and assess the estimated portfolio value, which has been 
updated using house price indices.

The repayment profile used to calculate the timing of future cash flows is based on historical data for first-time buyers selling their property.

The net impairment charge/reversal of the available for sale financial assets taken through the Consolidated Income Statement relates to 
borrower default including an estimate made for losses incurred that have not yet been reported to the Group by the home owner or the first 
charge provider and the impact of the change in UK house prices on the present value of the estimated future cash flows of these assets.

Further disclosures relating to financial assets are set out in note 24 and note 27(b)(i).

Residential property fund
During the prior year ended 30 June 2014, the Group disposed of its 1.3m units in a residential property fund that was managed by Hearthstone 
Investments, which at 30 June 2013, based on unadjusted quoted prices, had a market value of £1.3m, and was classified within current available 
for sale financial assets. No gain or loss was recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement in respect of this disposal for the year ended 
30 June 2014.

18. Deferred tax

The Group recognised a net deferred tax (liability)/asset with the following movements in the year:

Group

At 1 July 2013
Income Statement (charge)/credit
Amounts taken directly to equity
At 30 June 2014
Income Statement (charge)/credit
Amounts taken directly to equity
At 30 June 2015

Pension  
scheme  
£m

Share  
options  
£m

3.1
(2.9)
(0.8) 
(0.6)
(0.5)
–
(1.1)

9.1
0.9
1.7
11.7
1.4
1.4
14.5

Tax  
losses  
£m

84.7
(65.0)
–
19.7
(19.6)
–
0.1

Hedging  
£m

Brands  
£m

ACA  
£m

6.1
–
(2.0)
4.1
–
(0.5)
3.6

(23.0)
3.0
–
(20.0)
–
–
(20.0)

1.1
0.1
–
1.2
–
–
1.2

Other  
(net)  
£m

11.0
(7.1)
(0.4) 
3.5
(1.9)
(1.1)
0.5

Total  
£m

92.1
(71.0)
(1.5) 
19.6
(20.6)
(0.2)
(1.2)

It is not anticipated that any of the deferred tax liability in respect of brands will reverse in the twelve months following the balance sheet date. 
Whilst it is anticipated that an element of the remaining deferred tax assets and liabilities will reverse during the twelve months following the 
balance sheet date, at present it is not possible to quantify the value of these reversals.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements134

18. Deferred tax (continued)

In addition to the deferred tax liability shown on the previous page, the Group has not recognised a deferred tax asset of £2.3m (2014: £2.3m) 
in respect of capital and other losses because these are not considered recoverable in the foreseeable future.

The Company recognised a net deferred tax asset with the following movements in the year:

Company

At 1 July 2013
Income Statement credit/(charge)
Amounts taken directly to equity
At 30 June 2014
Income Statement (charge)/credit
Amounts taken directly to equity
At 30 June 2015

Pension 
scheme  
£m

Share  
options  
£m

Tax 
 losses  
£m

Hedging  
£m

ACA  
£m

Other  
£m

3.1
(2.9)
(0.8)
(0.6)
(0.5)
–
(1.1)

2.5
0.3
0.5
3.3
0.4
0.1
3.8

33.3
(13.7)
–
19.6
(19.6)
–
–

6.1
–
(2.0)
4.1
–
(0.5)
3.6

0.5
0.3
–
0.8
–
–
0.8

1.1
(0.4)
–
0.7
(0.7)
–
–

Total  
£m

46.6
(16.4)
(2.3)
27.9
(20.4)
(0.4)
7.1

All deferred tax relates to the United Kingdom and is stated on a net basis as the Group has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised 
amounts and intends to settle on a net basis.

The net deferred tax (liability)/asset recognised comprises:

Hedging
Losses 
Share options
Other items, including capital allowances
Deferred tax assets
Pension scheme
Brands
Other items
Deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax (liability)/asset

19. Inventories

Land held for development
Construction work in progress
Part-exchange properties and other inventories

Notes

Group

Company

2015  
£m

3.6
0.1
14.5
3.9
22.1
(1.1)
(20.0)
(2.2)
(23.3)
(1.2)

2014  
£m

4.1
19.7
11.7
8.0
43.5
(0.6)
(20.0)
(3.3)
(23.9)
19.6

2015  
£m

3.6
–
3.8
0.8
8.2
(1.1)
–
–
(1.1)
7.1

2014  
£m

4.1
19.6
3.3
1.5
28.5
(0.6)
–
–
(0.6)
27.9

2015  
£m

2,826.1
1,287.4
60.1
4,173.6

Group

2014  
£m

2,348.4
1,118.2
42.0
3,508.6

a) Nature of inventories 
The Directors consider all inventories to be essentially current in nature, although the Group’s operational cycle is such that a proportion of 
inventories will not be realised within twelve months. It is not possible to determine with accuracy when specific inventory will be realised as this 
will be subject to a number of variables such as consumer demand and planning permission delays. 

b) Expensed inventories
The value of inventories expensed in the year ended 30 June 2015 and included in cost of sales was £2,903.5m (2014: £2,500.7m).

c) Company
The Company has no inventories.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued135

20. Trade and other receivables

Non-current assets
Other receivables

Current assets
Trade receivables
Amounts due from subsidiary undertakings
Other receivables
Prepayments and accrued income

2015  
£m

3.3
3.3

123.8
–
22.4
12.6
158.8

Group

2014  
£m

6.2
6.2

86.5
–
13.5
11.8
111.8

Of the year end trade receivables, the following were overdue but not impaired:

Ageing of overdue but not impaired receivables

Less than three months
Greater than three months

The carrying values of trade and other receivables are stated after the following allowance for doubtful receivables:

Allowance for doubtful receivables

At 1 July
Charge for the year
Uncollectable amounts written off, net of recoveries
At 30 June

Notes

5

2015  
£m

–
–

0.3
695.6
0.5
1.3
697.7

2015  
£m

2.6
1.7

2015  
£m

4.0
2.6
(4.2)
2.4

Company

2014  
£m

–
–

0.1
810.2
0.7
1.1
812.1

Group

2014  
£m

4.9
1.5

Group

2014  
£m

3.0
2.6
(1.6)
4.0

The allowance for doubtful receivables consists of individually impaired trade receivables that are in default. The impairment recognised in cost of 
sales represents the difference between the carrying amount of these trade receivables and the present value of any expected recoveries. 
The Group does not hold any collateral over these balances.

The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade receivables approximates to their fair value.

Further disclosures relating to financial assets are set out in note 24.

21. Trade and other payables

Non-current liabilities
Land payables
Other payables

Current liabilities
Trade payables
Land payables
Amounts due to subsidiary undertakings
Accruals and deferred income
Other tax and social security
Other payables

2015  
£m

493.6
112.3
605.9

392.5
505.4
–
357.6
1.8
92.5
1,349.8

Group

2014  
£m

2015  
£m

Company

2014  
£m

367.2
80.1
447.3

243.4
412.2
–
332.1
2.2
122.1
1,112.0

–
–
–

4.4
–
23.0
22.5
–
–
49.9

–
–
–

0.9
–
42.9
23.3
–
–
67.1

Accruals and deferred income includes a £7.7m (2014: £5.6m) social security accrual relating to share-based payments (note 30). Other payables 
classified as current liabilities principally comprise payments received on account. Other payables classified as non-current liabilities at 30 June 
2015 principally comprise deferred payments relating to the acquisition of land in a non-wholly controlled subsidiary.

The Group has £357.8m (2014: £341.7m) of payables secured by legal charges on certain assets. Other non-current payables are unsecured and 
non-interest bearing. 

Further disclosures relating to financial liabilities are set out in note 25.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements136

22. Contract accounting

In relation to contracts in progress at the balance sheet date:

Amounts due from contract customers included in trade and other receivables
Amounts due to contract customers included in trade and other payables

2015  
£m

14.7
(14.6)
0.1

Group

2014  
£m

9.3
(5.5)
3.8

For contracts in progress at the balance sheet date, contract costs incurred plus recognised profits less recognised losses to date amounted to  
£228.4m (2014: £109.9m).

At 30 June 2015, retentions held by customers for contract work on contracts in progress at the balance sheet date amounted to £3.3m 
(2014: £7.9m), of which £2.2m (2014: £2.5m) are due for settlement after twelve months. Advances received from customers for contract work 
on contracts in progress at the balance sheet date amounted to £6.5m (2014: £27.1m), of which £nil (2014: £6.7m) relates to work, which is not 
expected to be performed in the next twelve months.

23. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents

2015  
£m

360.4

Group

2014  
£m

274.7

2015  
£m

294.1

Company

2014  
£m

259.0

Cash and cash equivalents are held at floating interest rates linked to the UK bank rate, LIBOR and money market rates as applicable. Cash and 
cash equivalents comprise cash held by the Group and short term bank deposits with an original maturity of three months or less.

Further disclosures relating to financial assets are set out in note 24.

24. Financial assets

The carrying values and fair values of the Group’s financial assets are as follows:

Designated as cash flow hedges
Derivative financial instruments
Loans and receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Available for sale
Non-current available for sale financial assets
Current available for sale financial assets
Total financial assets

The carrying values and fair values of the Company’s financial assets are as follows:

Designated as cash flow hedges
Derivative financial instruments
Loans and receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Intercompany loans

Total financial assets

Fair  
value  
£m

2015  
Carrying  
value  
£m

Fair  
value  
£m

Group

2014  
Carrying  
value  
£m

2.3

2.3

–

–

360.4
112.6

96.8
10.2
582.3

360.4
112.6

96.8
10.2
582.3

274.7
87.8

121.6
0.8
484.9

274.7
87.8

121.6
0.8
484.9

Fair  
value  
£m

2015  
Carrying  
value  
£m

Company

 2014  
Carrying  
value  
£m

Fair  
value  
£m

2.3

2.3

–

–

294.1
0.3
695.6

992.3

294.1
0.3
695.6

992.3

259.0
0.8
810.2

259.0
0.8
810.2

1,070.0

1,070.0

Notes

26

23

17
17

Notes

26

23

20

Trade and other receivables exclude accrued income, amounts recoverable on contracts, prepayments and tax and social security. The fair values 
of financial assets and liabilities are determined as indicated in this note and note 25(a).

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued137

24. Financial assets (continued)

The following table provides an analysis of financial assets that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1, 
2 and 3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:

•  Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical liabilities;

•  Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices;

• 

 Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset that are not based on 
observable market data (unobservable inputs).

Further details on the fair value of the financial assets measured in accordance with Level 3 can be found in note 17.

There have been no transfers of assets between levels of the fair value hierarchy and no non-recurring fair value measurements.

Notes

Level 1  
£m

Level 2  
£m

Level 3  
£m

Group

2015  
Total  
£m

Derivative instruments in designated hedge accounting relationships
Derivative financial assets 
Available for sale 
Non-current available for sale financial assets
Current available for sale financial assets
Total

26

17
17

–

–
–
–

2.3

–
–
2.3

96.8
10.2
107.0

–

2.3

Notes

Level 1  
£m

Level 2  
£m

Level 3  
£m

Derivative instruments in designated hedge accounting relationships
Derivative financial assets 
Available for sale 
Non-current available for sale financial assets
Current available for sale financial assets
Total

Further disclosures for available for sale assets are provided in note 17 and note 27(b)(i).

26

17
17

–

–
–
–

–

– 
– 
–

–

–

121.6
0.8
122.4

121.6 
0.8 
122.4

Derivative instruments in designated hedge accounting relationships
Derivative financial assets 
Total

Derivative instruments in designated hedge accounting relationships
Derivative financial assets 
Total

Level 1  
£m

Level 2  
£m

Level 3  
£m

–
–

2.3
2.3

–
–

Level 1  
£m

Level 2  
£m

Level 3  
£m

Company

2015  
Total  
£m

2.3
2.3

Company

2014  
Total  
£m

–
–

–
–

–
–

–
–

Notes

26

Notes

26

96.8
10.2
109.3

Group

2014  
Total  
£m

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements138

25. Financial liabilities

a) Fair value and carrying value
The carrying values and fair values of the Group’s financial liabilities are as follows:

Designated as cash flow hedges
Derivative financial instruments
Other financial liabilities
Bank overdrafts
Trade and other payables
Loans and borrowings
Total financial liabilities

,

Notes

Fair  
value  
£m

2015  
Carrying  
value  
£m

Fair  
value  
£m

Group

2014  
Carrying  
value  
£m 

26

17.0

17.0

21.2

21.2

25(c)

25(c)

–
1,717.9
178.4
1,913.3

–
1,707.8
176.5
1,901.3

33.3
1,320.8
168.9
1,544.2

33.3
1,317.4
166.8
1,538.7

The carrying values and fair values of the Company’s financial liabilities are as follows:

Designated as cash flow hedges
Derivative financial instruments
Other financial liabilities
Bank overdrafts
Trade and other payables
Intercompany payables
Loans and borrowings
Total financial liabilities

Fair  
value  
£m

2015  
Carrying  
value  
£m

Notes

Company

2014  
Carrying  
value  
£m 

Fair  
value  
£m

26

17.0

17.0

21.2

21.2

25(c)

21
25(c)

58.5
14.4
23.0
140.5
253.4

58.5
14.4
23.0
138.6
251.5

56.8
13.4
42.9
136.5
270.8

56.8
13.4
42.9
134.4
268.7

Trade and other payables excludes deferred income, payments received in excess of amounts recoverable on contracts, tax and social security 
and other non-financial liabilities.

Trade and other payables include land payables, which may bear interest on a contract specific basis, and items secured by legal charge as 
disclosed in note 21.

The fair values of financial assets and liabilities are determined as follows:

• 

• 

• 

• 

 The fair values of the secured loan available for sale financial assets are calculated using an internal valuation model. The model calculates 
the fair value on a loan by loan basis using the present value of expected future cash flows of each loan. The future value of each loan is 
based on original selling prices adjusted for regional house price inflation, which in turn is based upon independent valuation specialists 
and official published valuation data. Each loan includes an allowance for future low single-digit house price inflation on the property. 
In addition, the Group includes an allowance for borrower default, including an estimate made for losses incurred that have not yet been 
reported to the Group by the home owner or first charge provider.

 Derivative financial instruments are measured at the present value of future cash flows estimated and discounted based on the applicable 
yield curves derived from quoted interest rates.

 The fair values of other non-derivative financial assets and liabilities are determined based on discounted cash flow analysis using current 
market rates for similar instruments.

 The fair value trade and payables for both the current and prior years are measured using unobservable inputs in accordance with Level 3 
of the fair value hierarchy as they include land payables which bear interest on a contract specific basis, which require discounting to 
determine a fair value.

• 

 The fair value of trade and other receivables for both the current and prior years are measured in accordance with Level 3. The Directors 
consider the carrying amounts of financial assets recognised in the consolidated financial statements approximate to their fair values.

The following table provides an analysis of financial liabilities that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 
1 to 3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:

•  Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical liabilities;

• 

• 

 Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the 
liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and 

 Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the liability that are not based on 
observable market data (unobservable inputs).

There have been no transfers of liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy and no non-recurring fair value measurements.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued139

25. Financial liabilities (continued)

a) Fair value and carrying value (continued)

Derivative instruments in designated hedge accounting relationships
Derivative financial liabilities
Total

Derivative instruments in designated hedge accounting relationships
Derivative financial liabilities
Total

Derivative instruments in designated hedge accounting relationships
Derivative financial liabilities
Total

Derivative instruments in designated hedge accounting relationships
Derivative financial liabilities
Total

b) Drawn debt facilities
The drawn debt at 30 June comprises:

Non-current
Term loans
Government loans
Private placement notes
Total non-current borrowings
Current
Bank overdrafts
Government loans
Total current borrowings
Total borrowings

Notes

26

Notes

26

Notes

26

Notes

26

Level 1  
£m

Level 2  
£m

Level 3  
£m

–
– 

17.0 
17.0

–
–

Level 1  
£m

Level 2  
£m

Level 3  
£m

–
–

21.2
21.2

–
–

Level 1  
£m

Level 2  
£m

Level 3  
£m

–
–

17.0
17.0

–
–

Level 1  
£m

Level 2  
£m

Level 3  
£m

–
–

21.2
21.2

–
–

Group

2015  
Total  
£m

17.0
17.0

Group

2014  
Total  
£m

21.2
21.2

Company

2015  
Total  
£m

17.0
17.0

Company

2014  
Total  
£m

21.2
21.2

2015  
£m

88.2
24.7
50.4
163.3

–
13.2
13.2
176.5

Group

2014  
£m

2015  
£m

Company

2014  
£m

88.3
27.3
46.1
161.7

33.3
5.1
38.4
200.1

88.2
–
50.4
138.6

58.5
–
58.5
197.1

88.3
–
46.1
134.4

56.8
–
56.8
191.2

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements140

25. Financial liabilities (continued)

b) Drawn debt facilities (continued)

The weighted average interest rates, excluding fees, paid in the year were as follows:

Bank loans excluding swap interest
Net swap payment
Government loans
Term loans
Private placement notes

2015 
%

2.4
5.1
2.4
4.9
8.1

Group

2014 
%

2.9
5.2
2.0
4.5
8.2

2015 
%

2.4
5.1
–
4.9
8.1

Company

2014 
%

2.9
5.2
–
4.5
8.2

The principal features of the Group’s debt facilities at 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2014 were as follows:

i) Committed facilities
• 

 A committed £700.0m revolving credit facility, reducing to £550.0m in December 2017, was made available under credit agreements dated 
14 May 2013 and amended by amendment agreements entered into on 17 December 2014. As at 30 June 2015, £nil was drawn. £150.0m of 
this facility matures on 29 December 2017 and £550.0m of this facility matures on 17 December 2019.

• 

• 

 A committed £100.0m term loan, of which £100.0m was drawn at 30 June 2015, made available under a credit agreement dated 10 May 2011 
(as amended from time to time and most recently with effect from 17 December 2014), the maturity of which is scheduled to be repaid as 
follows: 25% on 1 July 2019; 25% on 1 July 2020; and 50% on 1 July 2021.

 Outstanding committed loans of £27.9m under the Government’s ‘Get Britain Building’ and local government ‘Growing Places Fund’ 
schemes. During the year £4.7m of scheduled repayments were made. The remaining balance is due to be repaid between 7 December 
2015 and 31 March 2018.

• 

 Committed loan facilities of £11.5m are available under agreements with local government which are due to be repaid between July 2015 
and March 2020. At 30 June 2015 a total of £10.0m was drawn on these facilities, including £0.2m of interest.

ii) Fixed rate US Dollar private placement notes
• 

 US Dollar private placement notes of $80.0m due on 23 August 2017 were issued pursuant to note purchase agreements dated 10 May 2011 
(as amended from time to time and most recently with effect from 17 December 2014).

iii) Bank overdrafts and uncommitted money market facilities
• 

 The Group also uses various bank overdrafts and uncommitted borrowing facilities that are subject to floating interest rates linked to UK 
bank rate, LIBOR and money market rates as applicable. 

All debt is unsecured.

c) Net cash
Net cash at 30 June is shown below:

Cash and cash equivalents
Non-current borrowings
Term loans
Government loans
Private placement notes
Total non-current borrowings
Current borrowings
Bank overdrafts
Government loans
Total current borrowings
Total borrowings
Derivative financial instruments
Foreign exchange swaps
Net cash

2015  
£m

360.4

(88.2)
(24.7)
(50.4)
(163.3)

–
(13.2)
(13.2)
(176.5)

2.6
186.5

Group

2014  
£m

274.7

(88.3)
(27.3)
(46.1)
(161.7)

(33.3)
(5.1)
(38.4)
(200.1)

(1.5)
73.1

2015  
£m

294.1

(88.2)
–
(50.4)
(138.6)

(58.5)
–
(58.5)
(197.1)

2.6
99.6

Company

2014  
£m

259.0 

(88.3)
–
(46.1)
(134.4)

(56.8)
–
(56.8)
(191.2)

(1.5)
66.3

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and other short term highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less. 
Net cash is defined as cash and cash equivalents, bank overdrafts, interest bearing borrowings and foreign exchange swaps. Included within 
non-current borrowings are prepaid facility arrangement fees of £12.3m (2014: £12.5m). The Group includes foreign exchange swaps within net 
debt. These swaps were entered into to hedge the foreign exchange exposure upon the Group’s US Dollar denominated private placement notes. 
The Group’s foreign exchange swaps have both an interest rate and an exchange rate element and only the exchange rate element on the notional 
amount of the swap is included within the net cash note above.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued141

25. Financial liabilities (continued)

c) Net cash (continued)
The Group’s derivative financial instruments at 30 June are shown below:

Foreign exchange swap – exchange rate element
Foreign exchange swap – interest rate element

Interest rate swaps
Net derivative financial instruments

26. Derivative financial instruments – swaps

2015  
£m

2.6
(0.3)
2.3
(17.0)
(14.7)

Group

2014  
£m

(1.5)
(0.3)
(1.8)
(19.4)
(21.2)

2015  
£m

2.6
(0.3)
2.3
(17.0)
(14.7)

Company

2014  
£m

(1.5)
(0.3)
(1.8)
(19.4)
(21.2)

The Group and Company have entered into derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate and foreign exchange risks as explained in 
note 27. Neither the Group nor the Company enters into any derivatives for speculative purposes.

Designated as cash flow hedges
Non-current
Interest rate swaps
Foreign exchange swaps
Total derivative financial instruments

Asset  
£m

2015  
Liability  
£m

Group and Company

Asset  
£m

2014  
Liability  
£m

–
2.3
2.3

(17.0)
–
(17.0)

–
–
–

(19.4)
(1.8) 
(21.2)

a) Interest rate swaps 
The Group and Company enter into derivative transactions in the form of swap arrangements to manage the cash flow risks, related to interest 
rates, arising from the Group’s and Company’s sources of finance. 

As at 30 June 2015, the Group had outstanding floating rate Sterling debt and overdrafts, excluding fees, of £126.9m (2014: £164.3m) and the 
Company had outstanding net floating rate Sterling debt and overdrafts, excluding fees, of £158.5m (2014: £156.8m). In obtaining this funding, the 
Group and the Company sought to achieve certainty as to the availability of, and income statement charge related to, a designated proportion of 
anticipated future debt requirements.

The Group and Company have entered into swap arrangements to swap £137.0m (2014: £137.0m) of this debt into fixed rate Sterling debt in 
accordance with the Group and Company treasury policy outlined in note 27. After taking into account swap arrangements, the fixed interest rates 
applicable to the debt were as follows:

£m

60.0
19.5
32.5
25.0
137.0

Fixed rate  
payable %

6.06
6.18
5.83
5.61

2015  
Maturity

2017
2017
2017
2022

£m

60.0
19.5
32.5
25.0
137.0

Fixed rate  
payable %

6.08
6.18
5.83
5.63

2014  
Maturity

2017
2017
2017
2022

The swap arrangements are designated as a cash flow hedge against future interest rate movements. The fair value of the swap arrangements 
as at 30 June 2015, which is based on third party valuations, was a liability of £17.0m (2014: £19.4m) with a gain of £2.4m (2014: £7.7m) credited 
directly to equity in the year. 

There was no ineffectiveness to be taken through the Consolidated Income Statement during the year or the prior year.

Further disclosures relating to financial instruments are set out in note 27.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements142

26. Derivative financial instruments – swaps (continued)

b) Foreign exchange swaps 
The Group and Company enter into derivative transactions in the form of swap arrangements to manage the cash flow risks related to foreign 
exchange arising from the Group’s sources of finance denominated in US Dollars. 

As at 30 June 2015, the Group and Company had outstanding fixed rate US Dollar loan notes of $80.0m (2014: $80.0m). 

The Group and Company have entered into swap arrangements to swap all of this debt into fixed rate Sterling debt in accordance with the Group 
and Company treasury policy outlined in note 27. After taking into account swap arrangements, the fixed interest rates applicable to the debt were 
as follows:

$m

80.0

Fixed rate  
payable %

8.14

2015  
Maturity

2017

 $m

80.0

Fixed rate  
payable %

8.14

2014  
Maturity

2017

The swap arrangements are designated as cash flow hedges against future foreign exchange rate movements. The hedges match the contractual 
initial receipt, the final settlement and match 100% of the interest payments. The fair value of the swap arrangements as at 30 June 2015, which is 
based on third party valuations, was an asset of £2.3m (2014: liability of £1.8m) with a gain of £4.1m (2014: loss of £7.3m) credited directly to equity 
in the year.

There was no ineffectiveness to be taken through the Consolidated Income Statement during the year or the prior year. Further disclosures 
relating to financial instruments are set out in note 27.

27. Financial risk management

The Group’s approach to risk management and the principal operational risks of the business are detailed on pages 40 to 45. The Group’s financial 
assets, financial liabilities and derivative financial instruments are detailed in notes 24, 25 and 26.

The Group’s operations and financing arrangements expose it to a variety of financial risks that include the effects of changes in debt market 
prices, credit risks, liquidity risks and interest rates. The most significant of these to the Group is liquidity risk and, accordingly, there is a regular, 
detailed system for the reporting and forecasting of cash flows from the operations to Group management to ensure that risks are promptly 
identified and appropriate mitigating actions taken by the central treasury department. These forecasts are further stress-tested at a Group level 
on a regular basis to ensure that adequate headroom within facilities and banking covenants is maintained. In addition, the Group has in place a 
risk management programme that seeks to limit the adverse effects of the other risks on its financial performance, in particular by using financial 
instruments, including debt and derivatives, to hedge interest rates and currency rates. The Group does not use derivative financial instruments 
for speculative purposes.

The Board approves treasury policies and certain day-to-day treasury activities have been delegated to a centralised Treasury Operating 
Committee, which in turn regularly reports to the Board. The treasury department implements guidelines that are established by the Board and 
the Treasury Operating Committee.

a) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will be unable to meet its liabilities as they fall due. The Group actively maintains a mixture of long term and 
medium term committed facilities that are designed to ensure that the Group has sufficient available funds for operations. The Group’s 
borrowings are typically cyclical throughout the financial year and peak in April and May; and October and November of each year, due to seasonal 
trends in income. Accordingly, the Group maintains sufficient facility headroom to cover these requirements. On a normal operating basis, the 
Group has a policy of maintaining a minimum headroom of £150.0m. The Group identifies and takes appropriate actions based upon its regular, 
detailed system for the reporting and forecasting of cash flows from its operations. At 30 June 2015, the Group had committed bank and other 
facilities of £887.7m (2014: £880.8m) and total facilities of £958.9m (2014: £932.0m). The Group’s drawn debt, excluding fees, against the 
committed facilities was £186.2m (2014: £180.8m). This represented 21.0% (2014: 20.5%) of available committed facilities at 30 June 2015. 
In addition, the Group had £360.4m (2014: £274.7m) of cash and cash equivalents. 

The Group was in compliance with its financial covenants at 30 June 2015. At the date of approval of the Financial Statements, the Group’s internal 
forecasts indicate that it will remain in compliance with these covenants for the foreseeable future, being at least twelve months from the date of 
signing these Financial Statements.

The Group’s objective is to minimise refinancing risk. The Group therefore has a policy that the average maturity of its committed bank facilities 
and private placement notes is at least two years on average with a target of three years. At 30 June 2015, the average maturity of the Group’s 
facilities was 4.0 years (2014: 3.7 years).

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued143

27. Financial risk management (continued)

a) Liquidity risk (continued)

The Group maintains certain committed floating rate facilities with banks to ensure sufficient liquidity for its operations. The undrawn committed 
facilities available to the Group, in respect of which all conditions precedent had been met, were as follows:

Expiry date

In less than one year
In more than one year but not more than two years
In more than two years but not more than five years
In more than five years

2015  
£m

–
–
701.7
–

701.7

Group

2014  
£m

–
150.0
550.0
–

700.0

2015  
£m

–
–
700.0
–

700.0

Company

2014  
£m

–
150.0
550.0
–

700.0

In addition, the Group had £71.2m (2014: £17.9m) of undrawn uncommitted facilities available at 30 June 2015.

The expected undiscounted cash flows of the Group’s financial liabilities, excluding derivative financial liabilities, by remaining contractual 
maturity at the balance sheet date were as follows:

Group

2015
Loans and borrowings (including bank overdrafts)
Trade and other payables

2014
Loans and borrowings (including bank overdrafts)
Trade and other payables

Notes

25(a)
25(a)

25(a)
25(a)

Carrying 
amount  
£m

Contractual 
cash flow  
£m

Less than  
1 year  
£m

1-2 years  
£m

2-5 years  
£m

176.5
1,707.8
1,884.3

200.1
1,317.4
1,517.5

295.4
1,773.9
2,069.3

333.6
1,375.9
1,709.5

40.6
1,143.7
1,184.3

68.7
878.5
947.2

32.8
269.0
301.8

36.9
221.3
258.2

144.5
322.8
467.3

121.7
233.6
355.3

Over 
5 years 
£m

77.5
38.4
115.9

106.3
42.5
148.8

The expected undiscounted cash flows of the Company’s financial liabilities, excluding derivative financial liabilities, by remaining contractual 
maturity at the balance sheet date were as follows:

Company

2015
Loans and borrowings (including bank overdrafts)
Trade and other payables
Intercompany payables

2014
Loans and borrowings (including bank overdrafts)
Trade and other payables
Intercompany payables

Notes

25(a)
25(a)
25(a)

25(a)
25(a)
25(a)

Carrying 
amount 
£m

Contractual 
cash flow 
£m

Less than 
1 year 
£m

1-2 years 
£m

2-5 years 
£m

197.1
14.4
23.0
234.5

191.2
13.4
42.9
247.5

314.3
14.4
23.0
351.7

322.3
13.4
42.9
378.6

84.9
14.4
23.0
122.3

86.5
13.4
42.9
142.8

26.4
–
–
26.4

29.6
–
–
29.6

125.5
–
–
125.5

99.9
–
–
99.9

Over 
5 years 
£m

77.5
–
–
77.5

106.3
–
–
106.3

The disclosure of contractual cash flows in the note above is calculated on the basis that the Group’s £700.0m revolving credit facility is fully 
drawn down. At 30 June 2015 none of this facility was drawn.

Trade and other payables exclude deferred income, payments received in excess of amounts recoverable on contracts, tax and social security and 
other non-financial liabilities.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements144

27. Financial risk management (continued)

a) Liquidity risk (continued)

The expected undiscounted cash flows of the Group’s and the Company’s derivative financial instruments, by remaining contractual maturity, 
at the balance sheet date were as follows:

Group and Company
2015
Financial assets
Gross settled derivatives:
Receive leg
Pay leg
Financial liabilities
Net settled derivatives

2014
Financial liabilities
Gross settled derivatives:
Receive leg
Pay leg
Net settled derivatives

Carrying 
amount  
£m

Contractual 
cash flow  
£m

Less than  
1 year  
£m

Notes

1-2 years  
£m

2-5 years 
£m

Over 
5 years  
£m

24

26
26

26

26
26

2.3
–

(17.0)
(14.7)

(1.8)
–
(19.4)
(21.2)

62.2
(60.1)

(17.5)
(15.4)

61.9
(64.0)
(19.4)
(21.5)

3.8
(3.9)

(7.1)
(7.2)

3.5
(3.9)
(6.5)
(6.9)

3.8
(3.9)

(6.3)
(6.4)

3.6
(3.9)
(5.3)
(5.6)

54.6
(52.3)

(2.6)
(0.3)

54.8
(56.2)
(5.9)
(7.3)

–
–

(1.5)
(1.5)

–
–
(1.7)
(1.7)

Under the Group’s International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreement (‘ISDA’), the interest rate swaps are settled on a net basis.

b) Market risk (price risk)
i) UK housing market risk
This section specifically discusses UK housing market risk in the context of the financial instruments in the Group Balance Sheet. 

The Group is subject to the prevailing conditions of the UK economy and the Group’s earnings are dependent upon the level of UK house prices. 
UK house prices are determined by the UK economy and economic conditions including employment levels, interest rates, consumer confidence, 
mortgage availability and competitor pricing. However, the Group does seek to maintain an appropriate geographic spread of operating divisions 
and an appropriate product mix to mitigate any risks caused by local economic conditions. The Group has detailed procedures to manage its 
market related operational risks, which include:

• 

• 

 a weekly review of key trading indicators, including reservations, sales rates, visitor levels, levels of incentives, competitor activity and cash 
flow projections;

 the provision to mortgage providers with complete transparency of house purchase prices alongside any discounts or other incentives in 
order that they have appropriate information upon which to base their lending decision; and

• 

 collaboration with key mortgage lenders to ensure that products are appropriate wherever possible for customers.

The UK housing market affects the valuation of the Group’s non-financial assets and liabilities and the critical judgements applied by management 
in these Financial Statements, including the valuation of land and work in progress, goodwill and intangible assets.

The Group’s financial assets and liabilities, which are directly linked to the UK housing market, are as follows:

Group
2015
Non-derivative financial assets
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Derivatives

2014
Non-derivative financial assets
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Derivatives

Linked to UK 
housing 
market  
£m

Not linked to 
UK housing 
market  
£m

107.0
–
–
107.0

122.4
–
–
122.4

473.0
(1,884.3)
(14.7)
(1,426.0)

362.5
(1,517.5)
(21.2)
(1,176.2)

Total  
£m

580.0
(1,884.3)
(14.7)
(1,319.0)

484.9
(1,517.5)
(21.2)
(1,053.8)

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued145

27. Financial risk management (continued)

b) Market risk (price risk) (continued)

i) UK housing market risk (continued)
The value of the Group’s available for sale financial assets is directly linked to the UK housing market. At 30 June 2015, these assets were carried 
at a fair value of £107.0m (2014: £122.4m). Further information is set out in note 17.

The Company has no financial assets and liabilities which are directly linked to the UK housing market.

Sensitivity analysis
The value of the Group’s house price linked financial assets, which are solely available for sale financial assets, is sensitive to UK house prices 
since the amount repayable is dependent upon the market price of the property to which the loan is linked. At 30 June 2015, if UK house prices had 
been 5% lower and all other variables were held constant, the Group’s house price linked financial assets and liabilities would decrease in value, 
excluding the effects of tax, by £5.8m (2014: £2.7m) with a corresponding reduction in both the result for the year and equity.

In addition the value of the asset is affected by mortgage rates, the availability of finance and UK economic conditions since all of these affect the 
risk of default.

ii) Interest rate risk
The Group has both interest bearing assets and interest bearing liabilities. Floating rate borrowings expose the Group to cash flow interest rate 
risk and fixed rate borrowings expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk.

The Group has a policy of maintaining both long term fixed rate funding and medium term floating rate funding so as to ensure that there is 
appropriate flexibility for the Group’s operational requirements. The Group has entered into swap arrangements to hedge cash flow risks 
relating to interest rate movements on a proportion of its debt and has entered into fixed rate debt in the form of US Dollar denominated 
private placements.

The Group has a conservative treasury risk management strategy and the Group’s interest rates are fixed using both swaps and fixed rate debt 
instruments. The Group’s policy target is for 0-40% of average borrowings over the 3 year plan period to be at fixed rates of interest. Due to the 
seasonality of the Group’s funding requirements, 105.4% (2014: 87.2%) of the Group’s gross borrowings were fixed as at 30 June 2015 and the 
average over the 3 year plan period is 43.2%. Group interest rates are fixed using both swaps and fixed rate debt instruments.

The exposure of the Group’s financial liabilities to interest rate risk is as follows:

Group

2015
Financial liabilities (excluding derivatives)
Impact of interest rate swaps
Financial liability exposure to interest rate risk
2014
Financial liabilities (excluding derivatives)
Impact of interest rate swaps
Financial liability exposure to interest rate risk

The exposure of the Company’s financial liabilities to interest rate risk is as follows: 

Company

2015
Financial liabilities (excluding derivatives)
Impact of interest rate swaps
Financial liability exposure to interest rate risk
2014
Financial liabilities (excluding derivatives)
Impact of interest rate swaps
Financial liability exposure to interest rate risk

Floating rate 
financial 
liabilities  
£m

Fixed rate 
financial 
liabilities  
£m

Non-interest 
bearing 
financial 
liabilities  
£m

115.1
(137.0)
(21.9)

152.5
(137.0)
15.5

61.4
137.0
198.4

47.6
137.0
184.6

1,707.8
–
1,707.8

1,317.4
–
1,317.4

Floating rate 
financial 
liabilities  
£m

Fixed rate 
financial 
liabilities  
£m

Non-interest 
bearing 
financial 
liabilities  
£m

169.7
(137.0)
32.7

188.0
(137.0)
51.0

50.4
137.0
187.4

46.1
137.0
183.1

14.4
–
14.4

13.4
–
13.4

Total  
£m

1,884.3
–
1,884.3

1,517.5
–
1,517.5

Total  
£m

234.5
–
234.5

247.5
–
247.5

Floating interest rates on Sterling borrowings are linked to the UK bank rate, LIBOR and money market rates. The floating rates are fixed in 
advance for periods generally ranging from one to six months. Short term flexibility is achieved through the use of overdraft, committed and 
uncommitted bank facilities. The weighted average interest rate for floating rate borrowings in 2015 was 3.1% (2014: 3.4%).

US Dollar denominated private placement notes of £50.4m (2014: £46.1m) were arranged at fixed interest rates and exposed the Group to fair 
value interest rate risk. The weighted average interest rate for fixed rate US Dollar denominated private placement notes, after the effect of 
foreign exchange rate swaps, for 2015 was 8.1% (2014: 8.2%) with, at 30 June 2015, a weighted average period of 2.2 years (2014: 3.2 years) for 
which the rate is fixed.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements146

27. Financial risk management (continued)

b) Market risk (price risk) (continued)

ii) Interest rate risk (continued)
Sensitivity analysis
In the year ended 30 June 2015, if UK interest rates had been 50 basis points higher/lower, as this is a reasonably possible change, and all other 
variables were held constant, the Group’s pre-tax profit would decrease/increase by £0.9m (2014: £0.7m), the Group’s post-tax profit would 
decrease/increase by £0.6m (2014: £0.5m) and the Group’s equity would decrease/increase by £0.6m (2014: £0.5m).

iii) Foreign exchange rate risk
As at 30 June 2015, the Group has fixed rate US Dollar denominated private placement notes of $80.0m (2014: $80.0m). In order to mitigate risks 
associated with the movement in the foreign exchange rate, the Group has a policy of fully hedging the principal of its US Dollar denominated debt 
and a significant proportion of the interest payments. The Group therefore entered into foreign exchange swap arrangements on the issue of its 
US Dollar denominated debt, all of which are designated as cash flow hedges, which fully hedge the principal of its US Dollar denominated debt 
and the US Dollar interest payments.

Details of the Group’s foreign exchange swaps are provided in note 26.

Sensitivity analysis
In the year ended 30 June 2015, if the US Dollar per Pound Sterling exchange rate had been $0.20 higher/lower and all other variables were held 
constant, the Group’s pre-tax profit would decrease/increase by £nil (2014: £nil), the Group’s post-tax profit would decrease/increase by £nil 
(2014: £nil) and the Group’s equity would decrease/increase by £nil (2014: £nil).

c) Credit risk
In the majority of cases, the Group receives cash upon legal completion for private sales and receives advance stage payments from Registered 
Providers for affordable housing. The Group has £107.0m (2014: £122.4m) of available for sale financial assets, which expose it to credit risk, 
although this asset is spread over a large number of properties. In addition, the Group and Company have an investment of £25.6m (2014: £25.6m) 
in a joint venture that holds available for sale financial assets, which exposes the joint venture to credit risk, although this is spread over a large 
number of properties. Included within trade and other receivables £45.9m (2014: £41.4m) is due from the Homes and Communities Agency in 
respect of the Help to Buy scheme. Since this receivable is due from a UK Government agency, the Group considers that this receivable has an 
insignificant risk of default. Other than this, neither the Group nor the Company have a significant concentration of credit risk, as their exposure is 
spread over a large number of counterparties and customers.

The Group manages credit risk in the following ways:

• 

• 

 The Group has a credit policy that is limited to financial institutions with high credit ratings, as set by international credit rating agencies, 
and has a policy determining the maximum permissible exposure to any single counterparty. 

 The Group only contracts derivative financial instruments with counterparties with which the Group has an ISDA Master Agreement in 
place. These agreements permit net settlement, thereby reducing the Group’s credit exposure to individual counterparties.

The maximum exposure to any counterparty at 30 June 2015 was £64.4m (2014: £71.8m) of cash on deposit with a financial institution. The  
carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the Financial Statements, net of any allowance for losses, represents the Group’s maximum 
exposure to credit risk. 

As at 30 June 2015, the Company was exposed to £695.6m (2014: £810.2m) of credit risk in relation to intercompany loans, as well as financial 
guarantees, performance bonds and the bank borrowings of subsidiary undertakings. The Company was also exposed to credit risk through its 
joint venture as explained above. Further details are provided in notes 34 and 35.

d) Capital risk management (cash flow risk)
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for 
shareholders and meet its liabilities as they fall due whilst maintaining an appropriate capital structure.

The Group manages as capital its equity, as set out in the Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, its bank borrowings (being overdrafts, 
loan notes and bank loans) and its private placement notes, as set out in note 25. 

The Group is subject to the prevailing conditions of the UK economy and the Group’s earnings are dependent upon the level of UK house prices. 
UK house prices are determined by the UK economy and economic conditions including employment levels, interest rates, consumer confidence, 
mortgage availability and competitor pricing. The management of these operational risks is set out in the principal risks and uncertainties on 
pages 40 to 45.

In addition, the other methods by which the Group can manage its short term and long term capital structure include: adjusting the level of 
dividends and special cash payments paid to shareholders (assuming the Company is paying a dividend or a special cash payment); issuing new 
share capital; arranging debt to meet liability payments; and selling assets to reduce debt.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued147

28. Retirement benefit obligations

The Group operates defined contribution and defined benefit pension schemes.

a) Defined contribution schemes
The Group operates defined contribution retirement benefit schemes for all qualifying employees, under which it pays contributions to an 
independently administered fund. Contributions are based upon a fixed percentage of the employee’s pay and once these have been paid, 
the Group has no further obligations under these schemes.

Contributions during the year
Group defined contribution schemes Consolidated Income Statement charge

2015  
£m

8.1

2014 
£m

7.8

At the balance sheet date, there were outstanding contributions of £0.9m (2014: £0.8m), which were paid on or before the due date.

b) Defined benefit scheme 
The Group operates a funded defined benefit pension scheme in Great Britain, the Barratt Group Pension & Life Assurance Scheme (the 
‘Scheme’), which with effect from 30 June 2009, ceased to offer future accrual of defined benefit pensions. Alternative defined contribution 
pension arrangements are in place for current employees.

The Scheme provides benefits to members based on their length of service and their salary in the final years leading up to retirement or date of 
ceasing active accrual if earlier. The Group operates the Scheme under the UK regulatory framework, with a legally separate fund that is 
Trustee-administered. The Trustees are responsible for ensuring that the Scheme is sufficiently funded to meet current and future benefit 
payments and for the investment policy with regard to scheme assets. 

The Trustees must agree a funding plan with the Group such that any funding shortfall is expected to be met by additional contributions and 
investment performance. In order to assess the level of contributions, triennial valuations are carried out using prudent assumptions.

The most recent full actuarial valuation of the Scheme was carried out at 30 November 2013. The results of this valuation have been updated to 
30 June 2015 by a qualified independent actuary. The Group has agreed with the Trustees of the Scheme to make contributions to the Scheme of 
£13.3m per annum until 30 November 2015 and then £9.5m per annum until 31 December 2016 to address the Scheme’s actuarial deficit. 
The Group also continues to meet the Scheme’s administration expenses and Pension Protection Fund levy. 

At the balance sheet date, there were outstanding contributions of £1.1m (2014: £1.1m).

The Scheme exposes the Group to a number of risks, the most significant being:

Risk

Description

Volatile asset returns

The defined benefit obligation (‘DBO’) is calculated using a discount rate set with reference to high quality corporate bond yields. 
If assets underperform this discount rate, this will create a plan deficit. The Scheme holds a proportion of its assets in equities 
and other growth assets which are expected to outperform corporate bonds in the long term. However, returns are likely to be 
volatile in the short term, potentially resulting in short term cash requirements and an increase in the defined benefit obligation 
recorded on the Balance Sheet. The allocation to growth assets is monitored to ensure it remains appropriate given the 
Scheme’s long term objectives.

Changes in bond yields A decrease in corporate bond yields will increase the funding and accounting liabilities, although this will be partially offset by an 

Inflation risk
Life expectancy

increase in the value of the Scheme’s investments in corporate and government bonds. 
A significant proportion of the DBO is indexed in line with price inflation, with higher inflation leading to higher liabilities.
The majority of the Scheme’s obligations are to provide a pension for the life of each of the members, so increases in life 
expectancy will result in an increase in the liabilities.

For the purposes of calculating the accounting costs and obligations of the Scheme, the assets of the defined benefit scheme have been 
calculated at fair (bid) value. The liabilities of the Scheme have been calculated at each balance sheet date using the following assumptions:

Principal actuarial assumptions

Weighted average assumptions to determine benefit obligations
Discount rate
Rate of price inflation
Weighted average assumptions to determine net cost
Discount rate
Rate of price inflation

2015

2014

3.80%
3.30%

4.30%
3.30%

4.30%
3.30%

4.70%
3.40%

Members are assumed to exchange 19% of their pension for cash on retirement. The assumptions have been chosen by the Group following 
advice from Mercer Limited, the Group’s actuarial advisers.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements148

28. Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

b) Defined benefit scheme (continued)
The following table illustrates the life expectancy for an average member on reaching age 65, according to the mortality assumptions used to 
calculate the Scheme liabilities:

Assumptions

Retired member born in 1950 (life expectancy at age 65)
Non-retired member born in 1970 (life expectancy at age 65)

Male 

Female 

23.6 years
25.4 years

26.1 years
28.1 years

The base mortality assumptions are based upon the S1NA mortality tables with an adjustment to allow for the Scheme members being 1.5 years 
younger than the population of the S1NA mortality tables. Allowance for future increases in life expectancy is made in line with the CMI 2014 
projections with a long term trend of 1.25% per annum (2014: 1.25% per annum).

The sensitivities regarding the principal assumptions used to measure the Scheme liabilities are set out below:

Increase in Scheme 
liabilities 
% 

Assumptions

Discount rate
Rate of inflation
Life expectancy

Change in assumption 

Decrease by 0.1%
Increase by 0.1%
Increase by 1 year

£m

7.3
4.1
12.0

The amounts recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement were as follows:

Interest cost

Interest income
Total pension (income)/cost recognised in net finance costs in the Consolidated Income Statement
Total pension (income)/cost recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement

The amounts recognised in the Group and Company Statements of Comprehensive Income were as follows:

Expected return less actual return on Scheme assets
Loss arising from changes in the assumptions underlying the present value of benefit obligations
Loss arising from experience from the 30 November 2013 actuarial valuation
Total pension cost/(income) recognised in the Group Statement of Comprehensive Income

2015 
£m 

13.9

(14.3)
(0.4)
(0.4)

2015 
£m 

(25.1)
36.6
–
11.5

The amount included in the Group and Company Balance Sheets arising from obligations in respect of the Scheme is as follows:

Present value of funded obligations
Fair value of Scheme assets
Surplus for funded Scheme/net asset recognised in the Group and Company  
Balance Sheets at 30 June

Net (asset)/liability for defined benefit obligations at 1 July
Contributions paid to the Scheme
(Income)/expense recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement (note 4)
Amounts recognised in the Group and Company Statements of Comprehensive Income
Net asset for defined benefit obligations at 30 June

2015 
£m 

367.5
(372.8)

(5.3)

2015 
£m 

(3.1)
(13.3)
(0.4)
11.5
(5.3)

2.0
1.1
3.3

2014 
£m 

14.3

(14.0)
0.3
0.3

2014 
£m 

(15.3)
6.4
5.4
(3.5)

2014 
£m

327.0
(330.1)

(3.1)

2014 
£m

13.4
(13.3)
0.3
(3.5)
(3.1)

A deferred tax liability of £1.1m (2014: £0.6m) has been recognised in the Group and Company Balance Sheets in relation to the pension asset 
(note 18).

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued149

28. Retirement benefit obligations (continued)

b) Defined benefit scheme (continued)
Movements in the present value of defined benefit obligations were as follows:

Present value of benefit obligations at 1 July
Interest cost
Actuarial loss
Benefits paid from Scheme
Present value of benefit obligations at 30 June 

Movements in the fair value of Scheme assets were as follows:

Fair value of Scheme assets at 1 July
Interest income

Actuarial gain on Scheme assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid from Scheme
Fair value of Scheme assets at 30 June

The analysis of Scheme assets was as follows:

Quoted equity securities
Debt securities
Other
Total

The actual return on Scheme assets was as follows:

Actual return on Scheme assets

The expected employer contribution to the Scheme in the year ending 30 June 2016 is £11.4m.

29. Share capital

Allotted and issued ordinary shares
10p each fully paid: 995,452,663 ordinary shares (2014: 984,983,475)

2015 
£m 

327.0
13.9
36.6
(10.0)
367.5

2015 
£m 

330.1
14.3

25.1
13.3
(10.0)
372.8

£m

159.7
170.0
0.4
330.1

2015 
£m 

39.4

2014 
£m

308.3
14.3
11.8
(7.4)
327.0

2014 
£m

294.9
14.0

15.3
13.3
(7.4) 

330.1

2014 
%

48.4
51.5
0.1
100.0

2014 
£m

29.3

2015 
£m 

2014 
£m

99.5

98.5

£m 

91.8
279.7
1.3
372.8

2015 
%

24.6
75.0
0.4
100.0

During the year, 2,176,347 (2014: 2,407,303) awards over the Company’s shares were granted under the Company’s Long Term Performance Plan, 
2,542,574 (2014: 3,363,707) options were granted under the Savings-Related Share Option Scheme (‘SRSOS’), 813,663 (2014: 785,879) awards over 
the Company’s shares were granted under the Company’s Co-Investment Plan and awards of 639,148 (2014: 709,644) were granted over the 
Company’s shares under the Senior Management Incentive Scheme.

Allotment of shares during the year
During the year, a total of 3,622,372 (2014: 1,090,558) shares were issued to satisfy exercises under the 2011 and 2012 SRSOS schemes and 218,051 
shares (2014: 71,331) were issued to satisfy early exercises under the 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 grants of the SRSOS schemes.

In addition, 6,590,688 shares (2014: 4,021,515) were issued to satisfy exercises under the 2011 Long Term Performance Plan, 38,077 shares (2014: 
nil) were issued to satisfy exercises under the Co-Investment Plan and no shares (2014: 84,979) were issued to satisfy exercises under the 
Employee Share Option Plan.

Employee Benefit Trust
The Barratt Developments PLC Employee Benefit Trust (the ‘EBT’) holds 1,860,071 (2014: 3,392,355) ordinary shares in the Company. The EBT 
disposed of 1,532,284 shares in settlement of exercises under the Senior Management Share Option Plan 2009/10, the Executive Share Option 
Scheme 2009/10 and the Co-Investment Plan. The market value of the shares held by the EBT at 30 June 2015 at 614.5 pence per share 
(2014: 373.7 pence per share) was £11,430,136 (2014: £12,677,231). The shares are held in the EBT for the purpose of satisfying options that 
have been granted under the Barratt Developments PLC Executive and Employee Share Option Plans, Long Term Performance Plans and 
Co-Investment Plans. These ordinary shares do not rank for dividend and do not count in the calculation of the weighted average number of 
shares used to calculate earnings per share until such time as they are vested to the relevant employee.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements150

30. Share-based payments

Analysis of the Consolidated Income Statement charge:

Equity-settled share-based payments:
Long Term Performance Plan
Savings-Related Share Option Scheme
Senior Management Incentive Scheme
Co-Investment Plan

2015 
£m

6.9
1.3
1.2
2.2
11.6

2014 
£m

5.7
1.2
0.7
1.4
9.0

As at 30 June 2015, an accrual of £7.7m (2014: £5.6m) was recognised in respect of social security liabilities on share-based payments.

a) Details of the share-based payment schemes
i) Long Term Performance Plan
The Long Term Performance Plan (the ‘LTPP’) was initially approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held in November 2003 to 
take effect from 1 July 2003. The ten year limit on powers to grant any awards under the LTPP expired on 12 November 2013 and a resolution 
seeking: (i) the approval of shareholders to extend the LTPP for a further ten years to 12 November 2023; and; (ii) the adoption of the updated rules 
of the LTPP, was proposed to, and passed by, shareholders at the 2012 Annual General Meeting. During the financial year ended 30 June 2015, 
2,176,347 (2014: 2,407,303) awards were granted under the LTPP. Awards under the LTPP are at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee 
(the ‘Committee’), taking into account individual performance and overall performance of the Group. An employee is not eligible to receive options 
under the Executive Share Option Scheme and awards under the LTPP in the same financial year. Information on the performance conditions for 
the LTPP awards to be granted during the 2015/16 financial year and each of the outstanding LTPP awards, can be found on pages 87 to 88 and 
page 94.

ii) Savings-Related Share Option Scheme
In November 2008, the Company adopted the Savings-Related Share Option Scheme (‘SRSOS’). Under the SRSOS, participants are required to 
make monthly contributions to a HM Revenue and Customs (‘HMRC’) approved savings contract with a bank or building society for a period of 
three or five years. On entering into the savings contract, participants are granted an option to acquire ordinary shares in the Company at an 
exercise price determined under the rules of the SRSOS. The SRSOS is open to all eligible employees as determined by the Board and is not 
subject to the satisfaction of any performance conditions.

iii) Executive Share Option Scheme
In November 2008, the Company adopted the Executive Share Option Scheme (the ‘ESOS’). The grant of share options under the ESOS is at the 
discretion of the Committee, taking into account individual performance and the overall performance of the Group. Options must be held for a 
minimum of three years from the date of grant before they can be exercised and lapse if not exercised within ten years from the date of grant. 
The exercise of options granted under the ESOS is subject to the achievement of an objective performance condition set by the Committee, which 
for options granted in 2009/10 was based upon total shareholder return and earnings per share performance conditions. The performance 
conditions for the ESOS granted in December 2009 (the ‘2009/10 ESOS’), were tested after the financial year ended 30 June 2012 and accordingly, 
32.8% of the 2009/10 ESOS vested on 10 December 2012. Participants have until 9 December 2019 to exercise their options.

iv) Senior Management Share Option Plan
In December 2009, the Company adopted the Senior Management Share Option Plan 2009-2012 (the ‘SMSOP’). The Board approved the grant of 
share options to employees under the SMSOP, which are normally exercisable between three and ten years from the date of grant, provided the 
employee remains employed by the Group. Individuals who participate in the SMSOP are not eligible to participate in the LTPP or ESOS; therefore 
Executive Directors do not participate in the SMSOP. There is currently no intention to make any further grants under the SMSOP. The options 
granted under the SMSOP in December 2009 (the ‘2009/10 SMSOP’), were subject to a ‘continued employment’ performance condition. 
The 2009/10 SMSOP vested on 10 December 2012 and participants have until 9 December 2019 to exercise their options.

v) Co-Investment Plan
The Co-Investment Plan (the ‘Plan’) was approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held in November 2005 and is currently utilised 
to hold shares awarded in respect of any bonus earned in excess of 100% of base salary. The Committee has the discretion to award matching 
shares against the deferred shares; however, no matching shares have been awarded to date. The Executive Directors also have the opportunity 
to voluntarily defer additional amounts of annual bonus up to a maximum of 25% of basic salary into the Plan. Further details are on page 87.

vi) Senior Management Incentive Scheme
In October 2012, the Board adopted the Senior Management Incentive Scheme (the ‘SMIS’). Awards under the SMIS are at the discretion of the 
Chief Executive (or in his absence, the Chairman of the Board). Any awards under the SMIS must be held for a minimum of three years from the 
date of grant. Executive Directors and those individuals directly below this level are not eligible to participate in the SMIS. Any award granted 
under the SMIS is subject to performance conditions as set for the LTPP, excluding the total shareholder return condition, granted in the same 
financial year. Further details are on page 87.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued151

30. Share-based payments (continued)

b) Outstanding equity-settled share-based payments
At 30 June 2015, the following options were outstanding:

Date of grant

Executive Share Option Scheme
10 December 2009 (approved*)
10 December 2009 (unapproved*)
Total Executive Share Option Scheme options
Senior Management Share Option Plan
10 December 2009 (approved*)
10 December 2009 (unapproved*)
Total Senior Management Share Option Plan options
Savings-Related Share Option Scheme
28 March 2012 – 3 year plan
28 March 2012 – 5 year plan
27 March 2013 – 3 year plan
27 March 2013 – 5 year plan
30 April 2014  – 3 year plan
30 April 2014  – 5 year plan
29 April 2015  – 3 year plan
29 April 2015  – 5 year plan
Total Savings-Related Share Option Scheme options
Total share options
Long Term Performance Plan
24 October 2012
23 October 2013
20 October 2014
Total Long Term Performance Plan awards
Co-Investment Plan
12 October 2012
2 October 2013
9 October 2014
Total Co-Investment Plan awards
Senior Management Incentive Scheme
24 October 2012
23 October 2013
20 October 2014
Total Senior Management Incentive Scheme awards
Total

Option price 
pence

2015 
Number

Not exercisable 
after 

118
121

118
121

125
125
205
205
349
349
447
447

–
–
–

–
–
–

–
–
–

8,350
443,132
451,482

437,976
145,663
583,639

9 December 2019
9 December 2019

9 December 2019
9 December 2019

715,852 30 November 2015
1,404,624 30 November 2017
1,844,357 30 November 2016
292,925 30 November 2018
2,591,300 31 December 2017
401,350 31 December 2019
2,283,261 31 December 2018
238,861 31 December 2020

9,772,530
10,807,651

4,620,159
2,407,303
2,176,347
9,203,809

1,260,382
771,966
812,360
2,844,708

450,218
623,293
599,029
1,672,540
24,528,708

–
–
–

–
–
–

–
–
–

*   The Executive Share Option Scheme and the Senior Management Share Option Plan are divided into two sub-schemes, one of which is approved under the Income Tax 
(Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 and the other which is not, and the exercise price is calculated differently for each sub-scheme in accordance with the rules of the 
sub-scheme.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements152

30. Share-based payments (continued)

c) Number and weighted average exercise price of outstanding share-based payments
The number and weighted average exercise prices of awards made under the Long Term Performance Plan were as follows:

Outstanding at 1 July
Forfeited during the year
Exercised during the year
Granted during the year
Outstanding at 30 June
Exercisable at 30 June

2015

2014

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

–
–
–
–
–
–

Number 
of award 
units

13,906,376
(288,226)
(6,590,688)
2,176,347
9,203,809
– 

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

–
–
–
–
–
–

Number 
of award 
units

17,087,663
(1,567,075)
(4,021,515)
2,407,303
13,906,376
– 

The number and weighted average exercise prices of options granted under the Executive Share Option Scheme were as follows:

Outstanding at 1 July
Exercised during the year
Outstanding at 30 June
Exercisable at 30 June

 2015

2014

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

121
121
121
121

Number of 
options

1,392,327
(940,845)
451,482
451,482

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

121
121
121
121 

Number of 
options

1,592,404
(200,077)
1,392,327
1,392,327

The number and weighted average exercise prices of options granted under the Senior Management Share Option Plan were as follows:

Outstanding at 1 July
Forfeited during the year
Exercised during the year
Outstanding at 30 June
Exercisable at 30 June

2015

2014

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

119
–
119
119
119

Number of 
options

1,358,461
–
(774,822)
583,639
583,639

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

119
118 
119 
119 
119 

Number of 
options

1,850,044
(33,224)
(458,359)
1,358,461
1,358,461

The number and weighted average exercise prices of options granted under the Savings-Related Share Option Scheme were as follows:

Outstanding at 1 July
Forfeited during the year
Granted during the year
Exercised during the year
Outstanding at 30 June
Exercisable at 30 June

2015

2014

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in  
pence

203
243
447
124
294
125

Number of 
options

11,956,053
(885,674)
2,542,574
(3,840,423)
9,772,530
715,852

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

143
156
349
109
203
105

Number of 
options

10,539,414
(785,179)
3,363,707
(1,161,889)
11,956,053
315,521

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued 
 
 
153

30. Share-based payments (continued)

c) Number and weighted average exercise price of outstanding share-based payments (continued)
The number and weighted average award price of awards made under the Co-Investment Plan were as follows:

Outstanding at 1 July
Exercised during the year
Granted during the year
Outstanding at 30 June
Exercisable at 30 June

2015

2014

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

–
–
–
–
–

Number 
of award 
units

2,192,596
(161,551)
813,663
2,844,708
–

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

–
–
–
–
–

Number 
of award 
units

1,435,655
(28,938)
785,879
2,192,596
–

The number and weighted average award price of awards made under the Senior Management Incentive Scheme were as follows:

Outstanding at 1 July
Forfeited during the year
Granted during the year
Outstanding at 30 June
Exercisable at 30 June

2015

2014

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

–
–
–
–
–

Number 
of award 
units

1,187,512
(154,120)
639,148
1,672,540
–

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price in 
pence

–
–
–
–
–

Number 
of award 
units

525,879
(48,011)
709,644
1,187,512
–

The weighted average share price, at the date of exercise, of share options exercised during the year was 478.4p (2014: 349.1p). The weighted 
average life for all schemes outstanding at the end of the year was 1.8 years (2014: 2.0 years).

d) Consolidated Income Statement charge
A charge to the Consolidated Income Statement has been made for the awards issued on or after 7 November 2002 that had not vested at 
1 January 2005 in accordance with IFRS 2 ‘Share-based Payments’. 

i) Savings-Related Share Option Scheme
The weighted average fair value of the options granted during 2015 was 119.8p (2014: 102.6p) per award. The awards have been valued using  
a Black-Scholes model.

The weighted average inputs to the Black-Scholes model were as follows:

Average share price
Average exercise price
Expected volatility
Expected life
Risk free interest rate
Expected dividends

Grants 
2015 

Grants 
2014

536p
447p
33.5%
3.2 years
0.70%
4.51%

370p
349p
38.0%
3.3 years
1.20%
3.30%

Expected volatility was determined by reference to the historical volatility of the Group’s share price over a period consistent with the expected life 
of the options. The expected life used in the models has been adjusted, based on the Directors’ best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, 
exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.

ii) Long Term Performance Plan
The weighted average fair value of the options granted during 2015 was 357.8p (2014: 327.5p). 

The awards have been valued using a Black-Scholes model for the earnings per share element of the scheme and a Monte Carlo model for the 
total shareholder return element of the scheme. 

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements154

30. Share-based payments (continued)

d) Consolidated Income Statement charge (continued)
ii) Long Term Performance Plan (continued)
The weighted average inputs to the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo models were as follows:

Average share price
Average exercise price
Expected volatility
Expected life
Risk free interest rate
Expected dividends

Grants 
2015
411p
nil
33.5%
3.0 years
0.93%
4.51%

Grants 
2014
339p
nil
38.0%
3.0 years
0.70%
3.23%

iii) Co-Investment Plan
The weighted average fair value of the options granted during 2015 was 323.0p (2014: 298.5p) per award. The awards have been valued by 
discounting the grant date share price for the dividend yield. 

The weighted average inputs used to discount the share price were as follows:

Share price at valuation date
Average exercise price
Expected life
Expected dividends

Grants 
2015
370p
nil
3.0 years
4.51%

Grants 
2014 
309p
nil
3.0 years
3.23%

iv) Senior Management Incentive Scheme
The weighted average fair value of the options granted during 2015 was 358.0p (2014: 327.5p) per award. The awards have been valued using 
a Black-Scholes model.

The weighted average inputs to the Black-Scholes model were as follows:

Average share price
Average exercise price
Expected volatility
Expected life
Risk free interest rate
Expected dividends

31. Reserves

Grants 
2015 
411p
nil
33.5%
3.0 years
0.93%
4.51%

Grants 
2014
339p
nil
38.0%
3.0 years
0.70%
3.23%

Hedging reserve
The hedging reserve represents the cumulative effective portion of deferred fair value gains or losses on derivative financial instruments that 
have been designated as cash flow hedges by the Company, where the hedged cash flows are still expected to occur.

Transfers to the hedging reserve in the period equate to losses of £0.5m (2014: £5.4m). This loss comprises a loss of £4.6m (2014: £1.9m gain) 
relating to interest rate swaps and gains of £4.1m (2014: £7.3m loss) on foreign exchange swaps.

Transfers from the hedging reserve to the Consolidated Income Statement for the period are gains of £2.9m (2014: £11.7m). Transfers arose from 
continuing cash flow hedges of interest rate risks and foreign exchange risks where the hedged risk impacted profit or loss in the year. Of these 
gains, £7.0m (2014: £5.8m) related to hedged interest cash flows and losses of £4.1m (2014: £5.9m gains) related to hedged foreign currency 
cash flows.

Merger reserve
The merger reserve comprises the non-statutory premium arising on shares issued as consideration for the acquisition of subsidiaries where 
merger relief under section 612 of the Companies Act 2006 applies.

Own shares reserve
The own shares reserve represents the cost of shares in Barratt Developments PLC purchased in the market and held by the EBT on behalf of the 
Company in order to satisfy options and awards under the Company’s incentive schemes. 

Share-based payments reserve
The share-based payments reserve represents the obligation of the Group in relation to equity-settled share-based payment transactions.

Parent Company Income Statement
In accordance with the provisions of section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, a separate Income Statement for the Company has not been 
presented. The Company’s profit for the year was £16.7m (2014: £165.4m).

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued155

32. Cash flows from operating activities

Profit for the year from continuing operations
Tax
Finance income
Finance costs 
Dividends received from subsidiaries
Share of post-tax profit from joint ventures
Share of post-tax (profit)/loss from associates
Profit/(loss) from operations
Depreciation
Impairment of inventories 
Reversal of impairment of available for sale financial assets
Impairment of investment in subsidiaries
Share-based payments charge
Imputed interest on deferred term payables
Imputed interest on available for sale financial assets
Amortisation of facility fees
Finance income/(costs) related to employee benefits
Total non-cash items
Increase in inventories
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
Decrease in available for sale financial assets
Total movements in working capital
Interest paid
Tax (paid)/received
Net cash inflow from operating activities

Notes

12

15
30
4
4, 17
4
4, 28

2015 
£m

450.3
115.2
(7.6)
64.6
–
(45.4)
(0.3)
576.8
3.3
11.7
(1.4)
–
11.6
(31.6)
4.6
(3.0)
0.4
(4.4)
(676.7)
(57.5)
394.7
21.9
(317.6)
(28.1)
(42.7)
184.0

Group

2014 
£m

305.4
85.2
(9.1)
68.8
–
(40.6)
0.1
409.8
2.0
8.9
(2.8)
–
9.0
(35.0)
5.8
(3.5)
(0.3)
(15.9)
(235.0)
(39.2)
147.0
9.5
(117.7)
(33.2)
(0.7)
242.3

2015 
£m

16.7
3.8
(60.4)
32.7
(19.9)
–
–
(27.1)
1.3
–
–
18.7
3.4
–
–
(3.0)
0.4
20.8
–
122.0
(16.6)
–
105.4
(30.3)
–
68.8

Company

2014 
£m

165.4
6.5
(60.9)
39.7
(160.0)
–
–
(9.3)
0.9
–
–
–
2.8
–
–
(3.5)
(0.3)
(0.1)
–
173.4
(105.9)
–
67.5
(40.4)
0.8
18.5

The Balance Sheet movements in land and available for sale financial assets include non-cash movements due to imputed interest. Imputed  
interest is therefore included within non-cash items in the note above.

33. Operating lease obligations

a) The Group as lessee
At 30 June 2015, the Group had outstanding commitments for future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases, which 
fall due as follows:

Within one year
More than one year and no later than five years
In five years or more

Land and 
buildings 
£m

15.0
22.1
27.0
64.1

2015 
Other 
£m

7.4
8.9
0.2
16.5

Land and 
buildings 
£m

13.9
25.2
28.8
67.9

Group

2014 
Other 
£m

7.0
9.0
–
16.0

Operating lease payments represent rentals payable by the Group for certain office properties and motor vehicles. Motor vehicle leases have an 
average term of 2.2 years (2014: 2.0 years) to expiry. Property leases have an average term of 1.6 years (2014: 1.2 years) to expiry.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements156

33. Operating lease obligations (continued)

a) The Group as lessee (continued)
At 30 June 2015, the Company had outstanding commitments for future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases, which 
fall due as follows:

Within one year
More than one year and no later than five years
In five years or more

Land and 
buildings 
£m

2015 
Other 
£m

Land and 
buildings 
£m

0.7
0.7
–
1.4

0.5
0.5
–
1.0

0.7
1.4
–
2.1

Company

2014 
Other 
£m

0.7
0.8
–
1.5

Operating lease payments represent rentals payable by the Company for certain office properties and motor vehicles. Motor vehicle leases have 
an average term of 2.0 years (2014: 2.1 years) to expiry. Property leases have an average term of 1.8 years (2014: 3.9 years) to expiry.

b) The Group as lessor
Property rental income earned during the year was £1.0m (2014: £1.8m).

The Group has lease agreements with third parties for certain commercial properties, either in the process of development or which have been 
developed by the Group, and units on land to be subsequently developed for residential use. It is intended that the commercial properties, with 
their future rental income, will be sold to third parties in the normal course of business and therefore they are classified as work in progress until 
the date of sale. At 30 June 2015, these properties had a carrying value of £1.7m (2014: £0.4m), and land with rental units had a carrying value of 
£0.7m (2014: £3.2m). At 30 June 2015, these rental agreements had an average term of 0.5 years (2014: 1.3 years) to expiry and total rental 
receivables over the remaining lease period are £2.0m (2014: £5.3m) with £1.0m (2014: £1.1m) within one year, £1.0m (2014: £2.3m) in more than 
one year and no later than five years, and £nil (2014: £1.9m) in five years or more.

34. Contingent liabilities

a) Contingent liabilities related to subsidiaries
The Company has guaranteed certain bank borrowings of its subsidiary undertakings.

Certain subsidiary undertakings have commitments for the purchase of trading stock entered into in the normal course of business.

In the normal course of business, the Group has given counter indemnities in respect of performance bonds and financial guarantees. 
Management estimate that the bonds and guarantees amount to £588.6m (2014: £490.5m), and confirm that at the date of these Financial 
Statements the possibility of cash outflow is considered minimal and no provision is required.

b) Contingent liabilities related to joint ventures and associates
The Group has given counter indemnities in respect of performance bonds and financial guarantees to its joint ventures totalling £39.8m at 
30 June 2015 (2014: £30.2m). The Group has also provided principal guarantees of £12.0m and cost and interest overrun guarantees in relation to 
the borrowings of a number of the Group’s London joint ventures (2014: £12.0m). At 30 June 2015, no cost or interest overruns had been incurred 
(2014: £nil). The Group’s maximum exposure under these cost and interest overrun guarantees is estimated at £15.7m as at 30 June 2015 
(2014: £8.6m).

At 30 June 2015, the Group has an obligation to repay £0.9m (2014: £0.9m) of grant monies received by a joint venture upon certain future disposals 
of land. 

The Group has also given a number of performance guarantees in respect of the obligations of its joint ventures, requiring the Group to complete 
development agreement contractual obligations in the event that the joint ventures do not perform as required under the terms of the 
related contracts.

c) Contingent liabilities related to subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates
Provision is made for the Directors’ best estimate of all known material legal claims and all legal actions in progress. The Group takes legal 
advice as to the likelihood of success of claims and actions and no provision is made (other than for legal costs) where the Directors consider, 
based on such advice, that claims or actions are unlikely to succeed, or a sufficiently reliable estimate of the potential obligations cannot be made.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued157

35. Related party transactions 

a) Remuneration of key personnel
Disclosures related to the remuneration of key personnel as defined in IAS 24 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ are given in note 8. There is no 
difference between transactions with key management personnel of the Company and the Group.

b) Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries
The Company has entered into transactions with its subsidiary undertakings in respect of funding and Group services (which include management 
accounting and audit, sales and marketing, IT, company secretarial, architects and purchasing). Recharges are made to the subsidiaries based on 
utilisation of these services.

The amount outstanding to the Company from subsidiary undertakings at 30 June 2015 totalled £695.6m (2014: £810.2m). 

During the year ended 30 June 2015, the Company made management charges to subsidiaries of £60.0m (2014: £51.5m) and received net interest 
on Group loans from subsidiaries of £56.0m (2014: £51.4m).

The Company and Group have entered into counter-indemnities in the normal course of business in respect of performance bonds.

c) Transactions between the Group and its joint ventures
The Group has entered into transactions with its joint ventures in respect of development management and other services (with charges made 
based on the utilisation of these services) and funding. These transactions totalled £11.1m (2014: £8.6m) and £2.2m (2014: £2.5m). In addition, 
one of the Group’s subsidiaries, BDW Trading Limited, contracts with a number of the Group’s joint ventures to provide construction services.

During the year the Group received dividends totalling £27.0m (2014: £23.6m) from its joint ventures.

The amount of outstanding loans and interest due to the Group from its joint ventures at 30 June 2015 is disclosed in note 13. The amount of other 
outstanding payables to the Group from its joint ventures at 30 June 2015 totalled £6.9m (2014: £nil). 

The Group’s contingent liabilities relating to its joint ventures are disclosed in note 34.

The amount of outstanding loans due to the Company from its joint venture at 30 June 2015 is disclosed in note 13. The Company has provided no 
guarantees to its joint venture.

d) Transactions between the Group and its associates
The amount of outstanding loans due to the Group from its associates at 30 June 2015 was £nil (2014: £nil). There were no other amounts 
outstanding to the Group from its associates as at 30 June 2015.

The Group’s contingent liabilities relating to its associates are disclosed in note 34.

e) Property purchase by a Director of Barratt Developments PLC
The Board and certain members of senior management are related parties within the definition of IAS 24 (Revised) ‘Related Party Disclosures’ 
(‘IAS 24’) and the Board are related parties within the definition of Chapter 11 of the UK Listing Rules (‘Chapter 11’). There is no difference between 
transactions with key personnel of the Company and transactions with key personnel of the Group.

During the year, the Group entered into the following transaction which, for the purposes of IAS 24 is considered to be a ‘related party transaction’.

In August 2014, Mark Clare, at the time, Group Chief Executive, reserved a flat (including a car parking space) from Fulham Wharf LLP, a joint 
venture partnership between BDW Trading Limited (the Company’s main trading subsidiary) and London and Quadrant Housing Trust (L&Q), at a 
purchase price of £1,692,350. This purchase was conducted at a fair and reasonable market price based on four independent market valuations 
and similar comparable transactions at that time. An amount of £2,500 was paid on reservation and a deposit of £166,735 was paid on 13 October 
2014. The remaining balance will become payable on legal completion, which is scheduled to be in December 2015, in accordance with the Group’s 
normal terms of trading. 

Fulham Wharf LLP is not controlled by and is not a ‘subsidiary undertaking’ of the Company.

On notification by Mark Clare of the above transaction, the Board sought advice from its legal advisers and corporate brokers in respect of the 
application of Chapter 11 and section 190 did not extend to LLPs and therefore the provisions of Chapter 11 and section 190 did not apply to this 
transaction. Consequently, no shareholder approval was required for this transaction.

There have been no ‘smaller related party transactions’ as defined in Listing Rule 11.1.10R for the year ended 30 June 2015 or in the year ended 
30 June 2014.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements158

36. Group subsidiary undertakings

The entities listed below, and on the following pages, are subsidiaries of the Company or Group. All are incorporated in England & Wales or 
Scotland with the exception of SQ Holdings Limited which is incorporated in Guernsey. Unless otherwise stated, the results of these entities are 
consolidated within these financial statements.

Subsidiary

Acre Developments Limited 1

Advance Housing Limited 1

Ambrose Builders Limited 1

Barratt Bristol Limited

Barratt Central Limited

Barratt Chester Limited 1

Barratt Commercial Limited

Barratt Construction (Southern) Limited 1

Barratt Corporate Secretarial Services Limited

Barratt Developments (International) Limited

Barratt Dormant (Atlantic Quay) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Blackpool) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Capella) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Cheadle Hulme) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Harlow) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Riverside Exchange Sheffield C2) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Riverside Exchange Sheffield L/M) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Riverside Quarter) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Riverside Sheffield Building C1) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Rugby) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Southampton) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Thetford) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Tyers Bros. Oakham) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (Walton) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (WB Construction) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (WB Developments) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (WB Properties Developments) Limited 1

Barratt Dormant (WB Properties Northern) Limited 1

Barratt East Anglia Limited 1

Barratt East Midlands Limited

Barratt East Scotland Limited 1

Barratt Eastern Counties Limited 1

Barratt Edinburgh Limited 1

Barratt Evolution Limited 1

Barratt Falkirk Limited 1

Barratt Leeds Limited

Barratt London Horseferry Road Limited 1

Barratt London Investments Limited 1

Barratt London Limited

Barratt Manchester Limited

Barratt Newcastle Limited 1

Barratt North London Limited

Barratt Northampton Limited

Barratt Northern Limited

Barratt Norwich Limited 1

Barratt Pension Trustee Limited

Barratt Poppleton Limited 1

Barratt Preston Limited 1

Barratt Properties Limited 1

Barratt Residential Asset Management Limited 1

Barratt Scottish Holdings Limited 1

Barratt South London Limited

Barratt South Wales Limited 

Barratt South West Limited 1

Barratt Southern Counties Limited

Barratt Southern Limited

Barratt Southern Properties Limited 1

Barratt Special Projects Limited 1

Barratt St Mary’s Limited 1

Barratt St Paul’s Limited 1

Barratt Sutton Coldfield Limited 1

Barratt Trade And Property Company Limited 1

Barratt Urban Construction (East London) Limited 1

Barratt Urban Construction (Northern) Limited 1

Barratt Urban Construction (Scotland) Limited 1

Barratt West Midlands Limited 

Barratt West Scotland Limited

Class of 
share held

Percentage 
of shares 
owned

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Subsidiary

Barratt Woking Limited 1

Barratt York Limited

Bart 225 Limited 1

Base Regeneration LLP 1

Base East Central Rochdale LLP 1

Base Hattersley LLP 1

Base Werneth Oldham LLP 1

Basildon Regeneration (Barratt Wilson Bowden) Limited 1

BDW (F.R.) Limited 1

BDW (F.R. Commercial) Limited 1

BDW Broadbridge Heath Limited 1

BDW North Scotland Limited

BDW Trading Limited

Bradgate Development Services Limited 1

Broadoak Homes Limited 1

Broomhill Park Estates Residents Association Limited 1

C V (Ward) Limited 1

Cameoplot Limited 1

Cannon Wharf London LLP 1

Choqs 429 Limited 1

Cityscene Developments Limited 

Citystyle Developments Limited 

Citystyle Limited

Crossbourne Construction Limited 1

Dalston Leaseholds Limited 1

David Wilson Estates Limited 1

David Wilson Homes (Anglia) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes (East Midlands) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes (Home Counties) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes (North Midlands) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes (Northern) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes (South Midlands) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes (Southern) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes (Western) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Land (No 9) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Land (No 10) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Land (No 11) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Land (No 12) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Land (No 13) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Land (No 14) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Land (No 15) Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Services Limited 1

David Wilson Homes Yorkshire Limited 1

Decorfresh Projects Limited 1

Dicconson Holdings Limited 1

E. Barker Limited 1

E.Geary & Son Limited 1

English Oak Homes Limited

Foxcote Mead Management Company Limited 1

Francis (Springmeadows) Limited 1

Frenchay Developments Limited 1

G.D. Thorner (Construction) Limited 1

G.D. Thorner (Holdings) Limited 1

Glasgow Trust Limited 1

Hawkstone (South West) Limited 1

Heartland Development Company Limited 1

Idle Works Limited 1

J G Parker Limited 1

James Harrison (Contracts) Limited 1

Janellis (No. 2) Limited 1

Kealoha 11 Limited 1

Kealoha Limited 1

Kingsoak Homes Limited

Knightsdale Homes Limited

Lindmere Construction Limited 1

Marple Development Company Limited 1

Class of 
share held

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

N/A

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Percentage 
of shares 
owned

100%

100%

100%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

 87%

100%

100%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued159

36. Group subsidiary undertakings (continued)

Subsidiary

Meridian Press Limited 1

Milton Park Homes Limited 1

Mountdale Homes Limited

Norfolk Garden Estates Limited 1

North West Land Developments Limited 1

Redbourne Builders Limited 1

Ridgeway Residential Management Company Limited 1, 2 

Riverside Exchange Management Company Limited 1

Roland Bardsley Homes Limited 1

Scothomes Limited 1

Scottish Homes Investment Company Limited 1

Skydream Property Co. Limited 1

SQ Holdings Limited 1

Squires Bridge Homes Limited 1

Squires Bridge Limited 1

Stoneyfield Management Limited 1

Swift Properties Limited 1

The 1249 Regeneration Partnership LLP 1

The French House Limited 1

The Tin Hat Regeneration Partnership LLP 1

Tomnik Limited 1

Trencherwood Commercial Limited 1

Trencherwood Construction Limited 1

Trencherwood Developments Limited 1

Trencherwood Estates Limited 1

Trencherwood Group Services Limited 1

Trencherwood Homes (Holdings) Limited 1

Trencherwood Homes (Midlands) Limited 1

Trencherwood Homes (South Western) Limited 1

Trencherwood Homes (Southern) Limited 1

Trencherwood Homes Limited 1

Trencherwood Housing Developments Limited 1

Trencherwood Investments Limited 1

Trencherwood Land Holdings Limited 1

Trencherwood Land Limited 1

Trencherwood Retirement Homes Limited 1

Vizion (Milton Keynes) Limited 1

Vizion (Mk) Properties LLP 1

VSM (Bentley Priory 1) Limited 1

VSM (Bentley Priory 2) Limited 1

VSM (Bentley Priory 3) Limited 1

VSM (Bentley Priory 4) Limited 1

VSM (Bentley Priory 5) Limited 1

VSM (Bentley Priory 6) Limited 1

Ward (Showhomes) Limited 1

Ward Brothers (Gillingham) Limited 1

Ward Holdings Limited 1

Ward Homes (London) Limited 1

Ward Homes (North Thames) Limited 1

Ward Homes (South Eastern) Limited 1

Ward Homes Group Limited 1

Ward Homes Limited 1

Ward Insurance Services Limited 1

Wards Construction (Industrial) Limited 1

Wards Construction (Investments) Limited 1

Wards Country Houses Limited 1

Waterton Tennis Centre Limited 1

WBD (Riverside Exchange Sheffield B) Limited 1

WBD (Wokingham) Limited 1

WBD Riverside Sheffield Building K Limited 1

William Corah & Son Limited 1

William Corah Joinery Limited 1

Wilson Bowden (Atlantic Quay Number 2) Limited 1

Wilson Bowden (Ravenscraig) Limited 

Wilson Bowden City Homes Limited 1

Wilson Bowden Developments Limited 1

Wilson Bowden Group Services Limited 1

Wilson Bowden Limited 

Yeovil Developments Limited 1

Abbey Park (Ampleforth) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Abbotts Meadow (Steventon) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

N/A

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

N/A

Ordinary

N/A

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

N/A

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

N/A

N/A

 90%

100%

100%

100%

100%

N/A

100%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

N/A

N/A

Class of 
share held

Percentage 
of shares 
owned

Subsidiary

100%

Ash Tree Court Residents Association Limited 1

Ordinary

100%

100%

Adderbury Fields Management Company Limited 1, 2

100%

All Saints Gardens Residents Company Limited 1, 2

100%

Ambers Rise (Bexhill) Management Company Limited 1, 2

100%

Applegarth Manor (Oulton) Management Company Limited 1, 2

100%

Artisan Place Residents Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

Autumn Brook (Yate) Management Company Limited 1, 2

 59%

Aylesham Village, Aylesham Management Company 1, 2

100%

Baggeridge Village Management Company Limited 1, 2

100%

Barley Meadows (Southminster) Management Company Limited 1, 2

100%

Beach Road (Pelham Grange) Cottenham Management Company Limited 1, 2

100%

Beaufort Park (Wotton Bassett) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Bentley Priory (Stanmore) Residents Management  
Company Limited 1, 2

Bexley Collage X2 Estate and Leasehold Management Company 1, 2

Blossombank (Cannon Lane) Tonbridge Management Company 1, 2

Bluebell Gate (East Grinstead) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Bluebell Woods(Wyke) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Bodington Manor (Adel) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Broadstone Mead Management Company Limited 1, 2

Brook Gardens Barnham Management Company Limited 1, 2

Brunel Gardens Management Company 1, 2

Class of 
share held

Percentage 
of shares 
owned

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Burrium Gate Management Company Limited 1

Ordinary

100%

Canal Walk (Chichester) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Cane Hill, Coulsdon, Kent 1, 2

Canterbury Park (High Cross) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Cardinal Park (Southampton) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Carruthers Court Management Limited 1, 2

Castlegate & Mowbray Park Management Company Limited 1, 2

Castle View (Newbury) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Cathedral Walk (Wells) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Carruthers Court Management Limited 1, 2

Cedar Ridge Management Company Limited 1, 2

Centurion Fields (Adel) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Chatham House Management Limited 1, 2

Cherry Tree Grove (West Parley) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Cissbury Chase (Worthing) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Clements Gate (Hawkwell) Residents Company Limited 1, 2

Colliers Court (Speedwell) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Comet Square Phase Two Block Management Company Limited 1

Ordinary

100%

Coopers Edge (Parcel 8) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Copsewood Management Company Limited 1, 2

Copseys Nursery (Havant) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Daracombe Gardens Management Company Limited 1, 2

Dehavilland Place (Hatfield) Management Company Limited 1, 2

De Lacy Fields KM8 Management Company Limited 1, 2

De Lacy Fields KM12 Management Company Limited 1, 2

Duchess Park (Newmarket) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Earls Park Management Company Limited 1, 2

Elms Gate (Westcliff-on-Sea) Residents Company Limited 1, 2

Elm Tree Park Management Company (Beverley) Limited 1, 2

Enterprise Way Management Company Limited 1, 2

Eton Green Management Company Limited 1, 2

Evolve (Gumley Road) Thurrock Management Company Limited 1, 2

Fairways (Bedford) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Foundry Place (Crawley) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Foxdown Overton Management Limited 1, 2

Freemen’s Meadow Residents Management Company Limited 1, 2

Fusion (Sun Street) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Garnets Wharf (Otley) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Gloucester Gate (Basildon) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Greylees Management Company Limited 1, 2

H2363 Management Company 1, 2

Halstead Place Residents Company Limited 1, 2

Hanham Hall Community Interest Company Limited 1, 2

Harlow Gateway Limited 1, 2

Hartley Brook (Netherton) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Hawley Gardens Management Company Limited 1, 2

Heathwood Park (Lindfield) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Hewenden Ridge (Cullingworth) Management  
Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Strategic ReportGovernanceOther InformationFinancial Statements160

Financial Statements

36. Group subsidiary undertakings (continued)

Subsidiary

High Beeches (Sharston) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Hollygate Park (Cotgrave) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Hortham Village Open Space Limited 1, 2

Hoylandswaine Management Company Limited 1, 2

Impact and Willowbrook Management Company Limited 1, 2

Kennett Heath Management Limited 1, 2

Kiln Road Thundersley Management Company Limited 1, 2

Kingley Gate (Littlehampton) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Kingsdown Gate (Swindon) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Kings Lodge (Chilwell) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Langham Mew Management Company Limited 1, 2

Leithfield Park (Godalming) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Liberty Green (Hull) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Liberty Rise Phase 1 (Hertford) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Locksbridge Park (Andover) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Lordswood Gardens Residents Management Company Limited 1, 2

Lyng Management Company Limited 1, 2

Lyttleton Grange Management Company Limited 1, 2

Madden Gardens Residents Management Company Limited 1, 2

Manor Farm (Denvilles) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Martindale Place (Southwater) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Martingale Chase (Newbury) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Mayflower Green (Saxmundham) Residents Company Limited 1, 2

Milford Grange (Storrington) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Millbrook Place (East Grinstead) Management  
Company Limited 1, 2

Class of 
share held

Percentage 
of shares 
owned

Subsidiary

Class of 
share held

Percentage 
of shares 
owned

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Skelmanthorpe Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

St. Andrews View (Morley) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

St Mary's Park (Hartley Wintney) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

Stanstead Road (Caterham) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

Swanbourne Park Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A 

Swan Mill (Newbury) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

Swinbrook Park (Carterton) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

Tenbury View Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

The Abacot Fields Residents Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Beeches (Nightingale Woods) Residential Management Company 
Limited 1, 2

The Belt Open Space Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Chase (Longfield) Residents Company Limited 1, 2

The Fieldings (Worthing) Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Foundry (Wakefield) Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Gateway (Handsworth) Management Co Ltd1, 2

The Hedgerows (Thurcroft) Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Larches (Offenham) Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Limes (Lindfield) Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Martlets (Crawley) Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Meads (Frampton Cotterell) Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Orchards (Roby) Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Overs Management Company Limited 1, 2

The Paddocks Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

The Sidings (Hull) Management Company 1, 2

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

The Orchards Oakley Management Company Limited 1

Ordinary

60%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Nexus Point Management Company Number 2 Limited 1

Ordinary 

80%

The Sidings (Stratford Road) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N.E. Horley Resident Management Company Limited 1, 2

Newbery Corner Management Company 1, 2

Nightingale Rise (Swindon) Management Company Limited 1, 2

NSQ Residents Management Company Limited 1, 2

Oaklands (Pontefract) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

The Spires (Chesterfield) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

The Tannery Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

The Vineyards Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

The Zone (Temple Quay) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

Trinity Gate (Finningley) Management Limited 1, 2

Optimus Point Management Company Limited 1

Ordinary

100%

Trinity Village Estate Company Limited 1, 2

Orchard Gate (Kingston Bagpuize) Management  
Company Limited 1, 2

Pavillion Square (Pocklington) Management Company Limited1, 2

Peasdown Meadows Management Company Limited 1, 2

Phoenix And Scorseby Park Management Company Limited 1, 2

Phoenix Quarter, GSK Works Dartford Kent X2, Estate  
and Leasehold 1, 2

Pilgrims Rest (Kempston) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Poppy Fields, Charing Residents Management Company Limited 1, 2

Portman Square West Village Reading Management Co. Limited 1, 2

Priory Fields (Pontefract) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Quivier Park (Canon Lane) Management Company 1, 2

Reflections 2 (Colchester) Residents Company Limited 1, 2

Regency Place (Leatherhead) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Riverdown Park (Salisbury) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Runshaw Management Company Limited 1

Salters Park Management Company Limited 1, 2

Sandpiper Walk (West Wittering) Management  
Company Limited 1, 2

Saunderson Gardens Management Company Limited 1, 2

Shobnall Street Management Company Limited 1, 2

Sholden Fields (Deal) Management Limited 1, 2

Silkwood Gate (Wakefield) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Silvas Grange (Heathfield) Management Company Limited 1, 2

1  Owned through another Group company

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Ordinary

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

100%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Trinity Village (Phase 1B) Residents Company Limited 1, 2

Trumpington Meadows Residents Management Company 1, 2

Victoria Park (Stone House) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Victoria Walk Management Company Limited 1, 2

Waters Edge (Mossley) Management Company Limited 1, 2

WBD Blenheim Management Company Limited 1

Ordinary

75%

WBD Kingsway Management Limited 1, 2

Wedgwood Residents Management Company Limited 1, 2

Westbridge Park (Auckley) Management Company Limited 1, 2

West Central (Slough) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Western Area Heat Company Limited 1, 2

West Village Reading Management Limited 1, 2

Weyside Place (Guildford) Management Company Limited 1, 2

White Sands Management Company Limited 1, 2

Wichelstowe (Swindon) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Wickhurst Green (Broadbridge Heath) Management  
Company Limited 1, 2

Willow Farm Management Company Limited 1, 2

Willowmead (Wiveliscombe) Management Company Limited 1, 2

Winnington Village Community Management Company Limited 1, 2

Withies Bridge Management Company Ltd 1, 2

Woodhall Grange Management Company Limited 1, 2

Woodthorne Residents Management Company Limited 1, 2

Woodlands Walk (Branton) Management Company Limited 1, 2

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2   Entity is limited by guarantee and is a temporary member of the Group. Assets are not held for the benefit of the Group and the entity has no profit or loss in the year.

Barratt Developments PLCAnnual Report and Accounts 2015Financial Statements – Notes to the Financial Statements continued161

Barratt Developments PLC
Annual Report and Accounts 2015

Other Information
Five Year Record, Financial Calendar, Group 
Advisers and Company Information

Five Year Record

Revenue (£m)
Profit/(loss) before tax (£m)
Share capital and equity (£m)
Per ordinary share:
Basic earnings/(loss) per share (pence)
Dividend (interim paid and final proposed (pence))
Special cash payment proposed (pence)

2015

3,759.5
565.5
3,711.3

45.5
15.1
10.0

2014

3,157.0
390.6
3,354.0

31.2
10.3
–

2013 
(*restated)

2,606.2
104.5
3,073.2

7.7
2.5
–

2012

2,323.4
100.0
2,973.8

7.0
–
–

2011

2,035.4
(11.5)
2,930.1

(1.4)
–
–

*   The Consolidated Income Statement and Statements of Comprehensive Income have been restated for 2013 following the adoption of IAS 19 (Revised) ‘Employee Benefits’ .

11 November 2015
13 January 2016
24 February 2016
11 May 2016
13 July 2016
7 September 2016

Financial Calendar

The following dates have been announced:

Announcement

2015 Annual General Meeting and Trading update
Trading update
2016 Interim Results Announcement
Trading update
Trading update
2016 Annual Results Announcement

Group Advisers

Registrars
Capita Registrars 
The Registry 
34 Beckenham Road 
Beckenham 
Kent 
BR3 4TU 

Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
Deloitte LLP 
London

Solicitors
Slaughter and May

Brokers and Investment Bankers
Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited 
Deutsche Bank AG

Company Information

Registered in England and Wales. Company number 604574 
Registered address: Barratt House, Cartwright Way, Forest Business Park, Bardon Hill, Coalville, Leicestershire LE67 1UF

i

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
c
R
e
p
o
r
t

G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e

i

F
n
a
n
c
a
l

i

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s

O
t
h
e
r
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

 
 
 
Visit us online 
www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk

B

a

r

r

a

t

t

D

e

v

e

l

o

p

m

e

n

t

s

P

L

C

A

n

n

u

a

l

R

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

A

c

c

o

u

n

t

s

2

0

1

5

Registered office
Barratt Developments PLC
Barratt House
Cartwright Way
Forest Business Park
Bardon Hill
Coalville
Leicestershire
LE67 1UF

Tel: 01530 278 278
Fax: 01530 278 279
www.barrattdevelopments.co.uk

Corporate office
Barratt Developments PLC
Kent House
1st Floor
14 – 17 Market Place
London
W1W 8AJ

Tel: 020 7299 4898
Fax: 020 7299 4851

Designed and produced by Radley Yeldar. www.ry.com

Printed by Pureprint using their pureprint and alcofree* environmental print technology. Pureprint is a CarbonNeutral® company and is registered to the Environmental Management 
System, ISO 14001 and the Eco Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS). This report is printed on Amadeus 50 silk containing 50% recycled fibres which is manufactured to ISO 14001  
and supported by the Forest Stewardship Council®. The cover is laminated with bio-degradeable lamination.