Quarterlytics / Healthcare / Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic / Bausch Health / FY2014 Annual Report

Bausch Health
Annual Report 2014

BHC · NYSE Healthcare
Claim this profile
Ticker BHC
Exchange NYSE
Sector Healthcare
Industry Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2014 Annual Report · Bausch Health
Loading PDF…
Be decisive,

and always 
find ways to grow.

stay balanced,

A   S I M P L E   P H I L O S O P H Y

2 0 1 4   A N N U A L   R E P O R T

company overview

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  is  a  multinational  specialty  pharmaceutical  and  medical  device 

company  that  develops,  manufactures  and  markets  a  broad  range  of  branded,  generic  and  branded  generic 

pharmaceuticals,  over-the-counter  (OTC)  products  and  medical  devices  (contact  lenses,  intraocular  lenses, 

ophthalmic surgical equipment and aesthetics devices) which are marketed in more than 100 countries. 

In our Developed Markets segment, we focus most of our efforts in the eye health, dermatology and neurology 

therapeutic classes. In the Emerging Market segment, we focus primarily on branded generics, OTC products 

and  medical  devices.  We  are  diverse  not  only  in  our  sources  of  revenue  from  our  drug  and  medical  devices 

portfolio, but also among the therapeutic classes and areas we serve. 

Valeant’s strategy is to focus our business on core geographies and therapeutic classes that offer attractive growth 

opportunities while maintaining our lower selling, general and administrative cost model and decentralized operating 

structure. We have an established portfolio of durable products with a focus on eye health and dermatology.

Another critical element of our strategy is business development. We have completed numerous transactions over the 

past few years to expand our portfolio offering and geographic footprint including, among others, the acquisition of 

Bausch + Lomb. We will continue to pursue value-added business development opportunities as they arise. 

The growth of our business is further augmented through our lower risk, output-focused research and development 

model, which allows us to advance promising developmental programs to drive future commercial growth. 

Valeant’s strategic markets are primarily in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, Russia, 

Africa and Asia Pacific. Headquartered in Laval, Quebec, Valeant has approximately 17,000 employees worldwide.

NON-GAAP INFORMATION              
To supplement the financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the Company uses non-GAAP financial measures that exclude certain items, such 
as amortization of inventory step-up, amortization of alliance product assets & property, plant and equipment step up, stock-based compensation step-up, contingent consideration fair value adjustments, 
restructuring, acquisition-related and other costs, In-process research and development, impairments and other charges (“IPR&D”), legal settlements outside the ordinary course of business, the impact of 
currency fluctuations, amortization and other non-cash charges, amortization including intangible asset impairments and write-down of deferred financing costs, debt discounts and ASC 470-20 (FSP APB 
14-1) interest, loss on extinguishment of debt, (gain) loss on assets sold/held for sale/impairment, net, (gain) loss on investments, net, and adjusts tax expense to cash taxes. Management uses non-GAAP 
financial measures internally for strategic decision making, forecasting future results and evaluating current performance. By disclosing non-GAAP financial measures, management intends to provide investors 
with a meaningful, consistent comparison of the Company’s core operating results and trends for the periods presented. Non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Therefore, 
the information is not necessarily comparable to other companies and should be considered as a supplement to, not a substitute for, or superior to, the corresponding measures calculated in accordance with 
GAAP. Reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures contained herein to the comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in our press release dated February 22, 2015, which can be found, 
along with reconciliations of other historical non-GAAP financials, at www.valeant.com.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 
In addition to current and historical information, this Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (or forward-looking 
information within the meaning of the Canadian Securities Administrator’s National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations) (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). These forward-
looking statements relate to, among other things: our strategy and operating principles and our ability to implement such strategy and operating principles; the prospects for (including anticipated sales 
revenue of) and anticipated timing of the regulatory submission, approval and launch of product candidates; our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits, results and targeted returns and paybacks of our 
acquisitions and other transactions; the prospects for, growth and future development of the Company, its business units and its products; and our expectations regarding our financial performance. Forward-
looking statements can generally be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan,” “continue,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “target,” 
“potential,” “forecast,” “project” and other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-
looking statements. Although we have indicated above certain of these statements set out herein, all of the statements in this Annual Report that contain forward-looking statements are qualified by these 
cautionary statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not 
be placed on such statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to these differences include, but are not limited 
to, risks and uncertainties discussed in our most recent annual or quarterly report and other filings filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Canadian Securities Administrators, which 
factors are incorporated herein by reference. You should consider these factors (and other uncertainties and potential events) in evaluating our prospects and future financial performance and in making 
decisions with respect to the Company. The forward-looking statements in this report speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements 
to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect actual outcomes, except as required by law.

T H E   R I G H T   P RO D U C T S .

T H E   R I G H T   P H I L O S O P H Y.

R E C O R D   O RG A N I C   G ROW T H .

1

VA L E A N T   L AT E - S TAG E   P I P E L I N E 

Valeant runs a lean R&D model focused on productivity – outputs measured against 

inputs – and spend based on the promise of a program for the short- and long-term. 

Leveraging industry overcapacity, outsourcing commodity services and focusing on 

the critical skills and capabilities needed to bring new technologies to market, the 

results of this approach are a rich pipeline of products for the future sourced from 

inside, acquisitions and in-licensing.

VA LEA N T LAT E STAGE R&D PORT FOLIO

Product

Category

Action

Expected launch year

enVista® Toric

Eye Health

Toric IOL

Brimonidine

VESNEO™

Eye Health

OTC

Eye Health

Glaucoma

Lotemax® Gel Next Gen

Eye Health

Post-operative pain and 
inflammation

ULTRA™ Plus Powers

Eye Health

Contact lens

Biotrue® ONEday Toric

Eye Health

Contact lens

2016

2016

2016

2016

2016

2016

IDP-118

IDP-120

 Emerade®

Derm

Derm

Moderate to severe 
plaque psoriasis

2017/2018

Novel acne combination

2019

Allergy

Anaphylaxis

2016/2017

Arestin® LCM

Oral Health

Antibiotic treatment for 
periodontal (gum) disease

2016

2

A Wealth of Promising Ophthalmic Drugs on the Horizon
During 2015, Valeant expects to progress three exciting and promising ophthalmology products 

currently in its R&D pipeline. Each has demonstrated positive clinical results and is scheduled to 

meet regulatory milestones in 2015, with commercial launches expected in 2016. 

Glaucoma is the second-leading cause of preventable blindness in the 
world and clinical data has shown that VESNEO™ can effectively lower 
intraocular pressure (IOP) which is critical in the management of glaucoma 

and ocular hypertension. Reducing IOP may prevent the progression of 

glaucoma in early and late stages of the disease. 

VESNEO™ is expected to have peak sales potential of approximately $500 million in the U.S. and 

$1 billion globally. A New Drug Application will be filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration 

(FDA) in the first half of 2015. 

Valeant expects to file a New Drug Application with the FDA sometime 
in the second half of 2015 for Lotemax® Gel Next Generation 0.38% 
(sub-micron gel formulation of loteprednol etabonate) which, if approved, 

would be the first twice-daily ophthalmic steroid available for eliminating 

inflammation and post-operative pain following ophthalmic surgeries.

Lotemax® Gel Next Generation is a new formulation – a lower concentration – of Valeant’s currently 
marketed ophthalmic products Lotemax® and Lotemax® Gel. It will also require less dosing than 
the current formulation. 

The third compound, low-dose Brimonidine, is an over-the-counter eye-whitening product for relieving 

ocular redness or hyperemia, which can be triggered by a variety of factors, including contact lens 

wear, dry eye or ocular allergies, among others. A New Drug Application is expected to be filed with 

the FDA in early 2015. Brimonidine will be introduced as the market’s first eye-whitening product, 

with projected annual sales revenue is approximately $300 million. 

3

2 014   P RO D U C T   L AU N C H E S

Valeant’s 20 key product launches in 2014 contributed to the company’s strong overall 

organic growth showing in 2014. Covering a range of therapeutic and OTC segments, 

the products were sourced from Valeant’s in-house R&D function, licensing, acquisitions 

(Bausch + Lomb and Medicis) and exclusive distribution deals.

Jublia® Exceeds Expectations
One of Valeant’s most exciting advancements 
in 2014 was the approval and launch of Jublia®
(efinaconazole 10% topical solution). Jublia®
represents the first new prescription branded 

actively supports the major medical associations 

and has the largest sales force calling on 

dermatologists and podiatrists. In addition, 

a comprehensive direct-to-consumer (DTC) 

marketing campaign, including print, digital and 

treatment for onychomycosis – a common and 

television ads, was launched in late 2014. The 

destructive nail infection – in more than 15 years. 
Jublia® is a solution that is applied daily to the 
affected nail.

highlight of this campaign was the 30-second spot 

,
on the Super Bowl XLIX telecast, 

which reached over 110 million 

n
viewers and resulted in more than 

There is a significant unmet need in this market. 

1.2 billion media impressions. 

An estimated 35 million Americans suffer from 

onychomycosis, yet only 3.5 million prescriptions 

are written for these patients annually. One 

reason may be that the choices for treating 

onychomycosis were often limited to prescription 

oral treatments with drug interactions and serious 

safety concerns or over-the-counter topical 

Since its mid-year launch in the 
U.S. and Canada, Jublia’s® growth 
th 
trajectory has been rapid. By the 

w
fourth quarter of 2014, just a few 
months after its launch, Jublia®
was already ranked #4 among 

treatments that offered limited efficacy. 

Valeant’s top global brands with 

Valeant is building awareness and education of 
onychomycosis and Jublia® within the medical 
community as well as with consumers. Valeant 

more than $54 million in sales 

for the quarter. The annualized 
run rate for Jublia® is more than 
$200 million.

4

Product 

Dermatology/Aesthetics

Bensal HP®

Luzu®

2 014 P RO DUC T L AU N C H E S

Description

Topical treatment for inflammation and irritation associated 
with many forms of dermatitis

Topical antifungal treatment for athlete’s foot

Source

Licensed 

Medicis

Neotensil®

Topical product to reduce appearance of under-eye bags

Licensed 

Obagi360™ System

Skincare kit for women in their 30’s

Retin-A Micro®.08%

Topical treatment for acne 

Jublia®

Topical antifungal treatment for onychomycosis

Ideal Implants

Breast implant

Hyaluronic acid for lips

Small particle filler 

Onexton™

Eye Health

Topical treatment for acne 

enVista® inserter (lens)

Further enhancements 

PureVision2 for Presbyopia

Daily contact lens

Victus® enhancements 

Multiple enhancements 

ULTRA™

Silicone hydrogel monthly lens 

BioTrue® multifocal 

Daily contact lens 

Trulign® expanded ranges (lens)

Broader range of powers 

Consumer

Internal

Internal 

Internal 

Acquired

Internal 

Internal 

Bausch + Lomb

Bausch + Lomb

Bausch + Lomb

Bausch + Lomb

Bausch + Lomb

Bausch + Lomb 

CeraVe® baby line 

OTC moisturizer 

Internal 

Peroxiclear®

Hydrogen peroxide-based contact lens solution 

Bausch + Lomb

SootheXP™

Oral Health

Ossix® Plus

Dry-eye drops 

Bausch + Lomb

Dental membrane

Exclusive distribution

Onset®

Dental analgesic

Acquisition

5

2 014   T R A N S AC T I O N S

With  more  than  40  transactions  in  2014  –including  the  acquisition  of  companies 

and other assets – business development continues to be a company priority. Within 

our developed markets our focus is on building out existing platforms, adding new 

platforms in fast-growing markets and acquiring tail products with extremely high 

internal rates of return (IRRs) and/or fast payback periods. The focus in our emerging 

markets is on branded generics and OTCs as we look to expand our footprint in Asia, 

the Middle East and Latin America.

2 014 R E V E N U E B R E A K D OW N 
BY P RO D U C T  S E G M E N T S

D

C

E

B

A

A / Pharmaceuticals 43% 
B / Branded and other generics 14%
C / Devices 20% D / OTC 21% 
E / Other Revenues 2%

C A S H E P S

$8.34

$6.24

$4.51

$2.93

$2.05

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Reconciliations of historical non-GAAP financials can be found in the quarterly 
press release financial tables posted on www.valeant.com.

6

Company/Product

Therapeutic Area

Region

K EY 2014 T R A NSACT IONS

PreCision Dermatology

Rx Dermatology

Korean JV

OnPharma

Mobivenal portfolio

ProDerm portfolio

Emerade® (license)

Macugen®

ECR Pharmaceuticals

VSY

Medico Uno

MedPharma

Croma

Valeo

PT Armoxindo Farma

Bescon

Protea

Zarracom

Aplenzin®

Tiazac®

Rx

Dental

OTC

Rx

Rx

Rx

Rx

Rx/OTC

OTC

Rx

Rx

Rx

Rx/OTC

OTC 

Rx

Rx

Rx

U.S. 

Korea

U.S.

Europe 

Canada

Worldwide

Rest of World

U.S.

Rest of World

Europe

Europe

Canada

Indonesia

Asia

South Africa 

Turkey

U.S.

U.S.

U.S. 

Rx/OTC

Middle East, North Africa

Nicox Diagnostic

Diagnostic

7

DE A R  F E L LOW  S H A R E HOL DE R S ,

2014 was another successful year for our company and its owners. Among the highlights 

were delivering double-digit organic growth for our Bausch + Lomb business in our 

first full year of ownership, launching four new dermatology prescription drugs in 
the United States (Jublia®, Luzu®, Retin-A® Micro .08% and Onexton™) and one in 
Canada (Jublia), achieving a double-digit emerging market organic growth rate and 

growing the entire company more than 10% organically for the full year. 

These and many other achievements provided significant value to shareholders by delivering an 

increasingly broad range of treatments to physicians and patients through our highly productive 

business model. 

In 2014, the strength of our base business became clearer in our financial results as both the impact 

of having four of our top 10 products being genericized in 2012 and 2013 were muted and we 

annualized the impact of having bought Bausch + Lomb in mid-year 2013. 

Furthermore, the effectiveness of our output-based R&D model became evident through our 
aforementioned prescription dermatology launches plus the launches of our CeraVe® baby line, 
Peroxiclear® contact lens solution, ULTRA™ contact lens and many other products around the world. 
In the U.S. alone, we launched 20 products across all of our businesses. These products will improve 

the lives of patients and provide new treatment options for our physician customers. Judging by the 

early results, patients and physicians have enthusiastically embraced these products. 

On the merger and acquisition front, we were less active than in a typical Valeant year. While 

we were unable to consummate the acquisition of Allergan, we once again demonstrated financial 

discipline in choosing to walk away from a deal that would not create sufficient shareholder value. 

However, we bolstered our presence in a number of key emerging markets such as Vietnam, Indonesia, 

and  the  Middle  East  and  Northern  Africa,  and  strengthened  our  dental  and  ophthalmology 

surgery businesses with some important tuck-in acquisitions. 

8

 
Most importantly, I am proud of all of our employees who weathered the attacks on our business 

during the Allergan battle and remained focused on delivering an exceptional year of growth and 

profitability for our shareholders. 

Six years ago, Valeant embarked on a journey to establish a new business model in the specialty 

pharmaceutical space. A model: 

• 

 That focused on high-growth therapeutic segments where customer relationships continued to be 

valued and reimbursement was more certain; 

• 

• 

 Where lower risk innovation played an important role and significant unmet patient needs existed; 

 Where we adopted a geographic lens that focused on emerging markets where population growth, 

improving incomes and low healthcare spend promised growth for decades to come; 

• 

 With a decentralized model that attracts entrepreneurial local management teams who embrace 

decision making and accountability; 

• 

 And  one  where  we  adopted  rigorous  financial  hurdle  rates  for  deploying  capital  to  ensure  we 

could deliver outsized returns for our shareholders. 

Over these past six years, we have built a thriving, durable healthcare company that has multiple 

platforms for future growth. I have never been more optimistic about our future – our ability to 

provide  superior  products  for  patients,  our  opportunities  to  enhance  the  provision  of  care  for 

physicians and our ability to continue to provide industry-leading returns to our investors. 

In closing, I would like to thank our more than 17,000 employees worldwide for their professionalism, 

commitment and hard work; our Board of Directors for their active oversight and leadership; and 

each of you – our investors – who believe in our company, our strategy and our ability to execute. 

We look forward to delivering another terrific year in 2015.

With best regards,

J . M I C H A E L  P E A R S O N
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

9

Board of Directors

Management Team

J. Michael Pearson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Howard B. Schiller
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial 
Officer

Robert R. Chai-Onn
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and 
Chief Legal Officer, Head of Corporate and 
Business Development

Dr. Ari S. Kellen
Executive Vice President, Company Group 
Chairman

Laizer D. Kornwasser
Executive Vice President, Company Group 
Chairman 

Dr. Pavel Mirovsky
President and General Manager, Europe

Brian M. Stolz
Executive Vice President of Administration and 
Chief Human Capital Officer

J. Michael Pearson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

Robert A. Ingram
Lead Director, Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.
Partner, Hatteras Venture Partners
Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance 
(Chairperson), Talent and Compensation

Ronald H. Farmer
Managing Director, Mosaic Capital Partners
Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance, 
Talent and Compensation (Chairperson)

Colleen A. Goggins
Corporate Director
Committee: Nominating and Corporate Governance, 
Sustainability and Environmental Subcommittee

Anders O. Lönner
Corporate Director
Committee: Talent and Compensation

Theo Melas-Kyriazi
Chief Financial Officer, Levitronix Technologies, LLC
Committee: Audit and Risk

Robert N. Power
Corporate Director
Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance 
(Chairperson), Sustainability and Environmental 
Subcommittee (Chairperson), Talent and Compensation

Norma A. Provencio
President and Owner, Provencio Advisory Services Inc. 
Committees: Audit and Risk (Chairperson), Special 
Independent (Chairperson)

Howard B. Schiller
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

Katharine B. Stevenson
Corporate Director 
Committee: Audit and Risk

Jeffrey W. Ubben
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer, 
ValueAct Capital
Committee: Talent and Compensation

10

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM  10-K
(cid:1) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)  OF THE  SECURITIES  EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

(cid:2) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For  the  fiscal year  ended December 31,  2014

OR

For  the  transition period from 

 to 

Commission file number 001-14956

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL,  INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified  in its Charter)

BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA
State  or  other jurisdiction of
incorporation  or organization

98-0448205
(I.R.S.  Employer  Identification No.)

2150 St. Elz´ear Blvd.  West
Laval, Quebec
Canada, H7L 4A8
(Address of principal  executive offices)

(514)  744-6792
Registrant’s  telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant  to Section  12(b)  of  the Act:

Title  of  each class

Name  of  each  exchange on  which  registered

Common Shares,  No  Par Value

New  York  Stock  Exchange, Toronto Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant  to section  12(g) of  the  Act:

None
(Title of class)

Indicate by check  mark  if  the registrant is a well-known seasoned  issuer, as  defined  in Rule 405 of  the  Securities  Act. Yes  (cid:1) No (cid:2)

Indicate by check  mark  if  the registrant is not  required to file reports  pursuant to Section  13 or Section  15(d)  of the Act. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:1)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90  days. Yes  (cid:1) No (cid:2)

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  has  submitted  electronically  and  posted  on  its  corporate  Web  site,  if  any,  every  Interactive  Data  File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files). Yes  (cid:1) No (cid:2)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. 

(cid:2)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See

the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated  filer,’’  ‘‘accelerated  filer’’  and ‘‘smaller  reporting company’’ in  Rule 12b-2 of the  Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated  filer (cid:1)

Accelerated filer  (cid:2)

Non-accelerated filer (cid:2)
(Do  not check if  a smaller
reporting company)

Smaller reporting  company (cid:2)

Indicate by check mark  whether the  registrant  is  a  shell company  (as defined  in Rule 12b-2 of the  Exchange Act). Yes  (cid:2) No (cid:1)

The  aggregate  market  value  of  the  common  shares  held  by  non-affiliates  of  the  registrant  as  of  the  last  business  day  of  the  registrant’s  most  recently

completed second fiscal quarter was  $37,219,586,000  based  on the last  reported sale  price on  the New  York Stock  Exchange  on June 30, 2014.

The number of outstanding shares  of the  registrant’s  common stock  as of February 18,  2015 was 336,202,718.

Part  III  incorporates  certain  information  by  reference  from  the  registrant’s  proxy  statement  for  the  2015  Annual  Meeting  of  Shareholders.  Such  proxy

statement will be filed no  later than  120  days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL INFORMATION

PART I

Item 1.

Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 1A.

Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 2.

Item 3.

Item 4.

Item 5.

Item 6.

Item 7.

Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART II

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,  Related Stockholder  Matters and  Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Management’s Discussion and  Analysis  of Financial Condition and  Results of Operations . .

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About  Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 8.

Item 9.

Financial Statements and  Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Changes in and Disagreements  with Accountants on Accounting and  Financial Disclosure .

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9B.

Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers  and  Corporate  Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 11.

Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,  and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and  Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART IV

1

11

25

25

26

26

27

31

32

73

73

73

73

73

74

74

74

74

74

75

85

Basis of Presentation

General

Except  where  the  context  otherwise  requires,  all  references  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K
(‘‘Form 10-K’’) to the ‘‘Company’’, ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, ‘‘our’’ or similar words or phrases are to Valeant Pharmaceuticals
International, Inc. and its subsidiaries, taken together. In this Form 10-K, references to ‘‘$’’ and ‘‘US$’’ are to
United States dollars. Unless otherwise indicated, the statistical and financial data contained in this Form 10-K
are presented as of December 31, 2014.

Trademarks

BRILLIANT(cid:4), 

CLINDAGEL(cid:4), 

‘‘U.S.’’)  or  certain  other 

The following words are some of the trademarks in our Company’s trademark portfolio and are the subject
of either registration, or application for registration, in one or more of Canada, the United States of America
jurisdictions:  ACANYA(cid:4),  AFEXA(cid:4),  AKREOS(cid:4),  ANTI-ANGIN(cid:4),
(the 
ANTIGRIPPIN(cid:4),  ARESTIN(cid:4),  ATRALIN(cid:4),  B&L(cid:4),  B+L(cid:4),  BAUSCH  &  LOMB(cid:4),  BAUSCH  +  LOMB(cid:4),
BAUSCH  +  LOMB  ULTRA(cid:4),  BEDOYECTA(cid:4),  BENZACLIN(cid:4),  BESIVANCE(cid:4),  BIAFINE(cid:4),  BIOTRUE(cid:4),
BIOVAIL(cid:4),  BOSTON(cid:4),  CALADRYL(cid:4),  CARAC(cid:4),  CARDIZEM(cid:4),  CEFZIL(cid:4),  CERAVE(cid:4),  CESAMET(cid:4),
COLDSORE-FX(cid:4),
CLEAR  + 
COMFORTMOIST(cid:4),  CONDITION  &  ENHANCE(cid:4),  CORTAID(cid:4),  CRYSTALENS(cid:4),  DERMAGLOW(cid:4),
DERMIK(cid:4),  DIASTAT(cid:4),  DIFFLAM(cid:4),  DURACEF(cid:4),  DUROMINE(cid:4),  DURO-TUSS(cid:4),  EFUDEX(cid:4),
ELASTIDERM(cid:4),  ENVISTA(cid:4),  ERTACZO(cid:4),  FRAXEL(cid:4),  HYPERGEL(cid:5),  JUBLIA(cid:4),  LACRISERT(cid:4),
LIPOSONIX(cid:4),  LOCOID(cid:4),  LODALIS(cid:5),  LOTEMAX(cid:4),  LUZU(cid:4),  MEDICIS(cid:4),  MEGACE(cid:4),  MEPHYTON(cid:4),
METERMINE(cid:4),  MOISTURESEAL(cid:4),  MONOPRIL(cid:4),  NU-DERM(cid:4),  OBAGI(cid:4),  OBAGI  CLENZIDERM(cid:4),
OBAGI-C(cid:4),  OBAGI  NU-DERM(cid:4),  OCUVITE(cid:4),  ONSET  DERMATOLOGICS(cid:4),  ORTHO
DERMATOLOGICS(cid:4),  POTIGA(cid:4),  PRESERVISION(cid:4),  PROLENSA(cid:4),  PUREVISION(cid:4),  PURPOSE(cid:4),
RENU(cid:4),  RENU  MULTIPLUS(cid:4),  RETIN-A(cid:4),  RETIN-A  MICRO(cid:4),  RIKODEINE(cid:4),  SHOWER  TO
SHOWER(cid:4),  SOFLENS(cid:4),  SOLODYN(cid:4),  SOLTA  MEDICAL(cid:4),  STELLARIS(cid:4),  SYPRINE(cid:4),  TARGRETIN(cid:4),
THERMAGE(cid:4),  THERMAGE  CPT(cid:4),  TIAZAC(cid:4),  VALEANT(cid:4),  VALEANT  V  &  DESIGN(cid:4),  VALEANT
PHARMACEUTICALS  &  DESIGN(cid:4),  VANOS(cid:4),  VESNEO(cid:5),  VICTUS(cid:4),  XENAZINE(cid:4),  ZIANA(cid:4),  and
ZYCLARA(cid:4).

CLODERM(cid:4), 

COLD-FX(cid:4), 

WELLBUTRIN(cid:4), WELLBUTRIN XL(cid:4) and ZOVIRAX(cid:4) are trademarks of The GlaxoSmithKline Group
of Companies and are used by us under license. ULTRAM(cid:4) is a trademark of Johnson & Johnson and is used by
us  under  license.  MVE(cid:4)  is  a  registered  trademark  of  DFB  Technology  Ltd.  and  is  used  by  us  under  license.
ELIDEL(cid:4) and XERESE(cid:4) are registered trademarks of Meda Pharma SARL and are used by us under license.
VISUDYNE(cid:4) is a registered trademark of Novartis Pharma AG and is used by us under license. BENSAL HP(cid:4)
is a registered trademark and is used by us under license from SMG Pharmaceuticals, LLC. EMERADE(cid:4) is a
registered trademark of Medeca Pharma  AB  and is used by us under license from Namtall AB.

In addition to the trademarks noted above, we have filed trademark applications and/or obtained trademark
registrations  for  many  of  our  other  trademarks  in  the  U.S.,  Canada  and  in  other  jurisdictions  and  have
implemented, on an ongoing basis, a  trademark  protection program for  new  trademarks.

Forward-Looking Statements

Caution  regarding  forward-looking  information  and  statements  and  ‘‘Safe-Harbor’’  statements  under  the

U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform  Act  of 1995:

To  the  extent  any  statements  made  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  contain  information  that  is  not
historical, these statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933,  as  amended,  and  Section  21E  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and  may  be  forward-
looking  information  within  the  meaning  defined  under  applicable  Canadian  securities  legislation  (collectively,
‘‘forward-looking statements’’).

These  forward-looking  statements  relate  to,  among  other  things:  the  expected  benefits  of  our  acquisitions  and
other transactions (including the proposed acquisition of Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (‘‘Salix’’)), such as cost savings,
operating  synergies  and  growth  potential  of  the  Company;  business  plans  and  prospects,  prospective  products  or

i

product  approvals,  future  performance  or  results  of  current  and  anticipated  products;  exposure  to  foreign  currency
exchange  rate  changes  and  interest  rate  changes;  the  outcome  of  contingencies,  such  as  certain  litigation  and
regulatory  proceedings;  general  market  conditions;  and  our  expectations  regarding  our  financial  performance,
including revenues, expenses, gross margins, liquidity and  income taxes.

Forward-looking  statements  can  generally  be  identified  by  the  use  of  words  such  as  ‘‘believe’’,  ‘‘anticipate’’,
‘‘expect’’,  ‘‘intend’’,  ‘‘estimate’’,  ‘‘plan’’,  ‘‘continue’’,  ‘‘will’’,  ‘‘may’’,  ‘‘could’’,  ‘‘would’’,  ‘‘should’’,  ‘‘target’’,
‘‘potential’’, ‘‘opportunity’’, ‘‘tentative’’, ‘‘positioning’’, ‘‘designed’’, ‘‘create’’, ‘‘predict’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘ongoing’’,
‘‘increase’’,  or  ‘‘upside’’  and  variations  or  other  similar  expressions.  In  addition,  any  statements  that  refer  to
expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements.
These  forward-looking  statements  may  not  be  appropriate  for  other  purposes.  Although  we  have  indicated  above
certain  of  these  statements  set  out  herein,  all  of  the  statements  in  this  Form  10-K  that  contain  forward-looking
statements are qualified by these cautionary statements. These statements are based upon the current expectations and
beliefs  of  management.  Although  we  believe  that  the  expectations  reflected  in  such  forward-looking  statements  are
reasonable,  such  statements  involve  risks  and  uncertainties,  and  undue  reliance  should  not  be  placed  on  such
statements. Certain material factors or assumptions are applied in making forward-looking statements, including, but
not limited to, factors and assumptions regarding the items outlined above. Actual results may differ materially from
those  expressed  or  implied  in  such  statements.  Important  factors  that  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ  materially
from these expectations include, among  other things, the following:

(cid:127) the  challenges  and  difficulties  associated  with  managing  the  rapid  growth  of  our  Company  and  a  large

complex business;

(cid:127) our ability to retain, motivate and recruit  executives  and other  key  employees;

(cid:127) the  introduction  of  products  that  compete  against  our  products  that  do  not  have  patent  or  data  exclusivity

rights;

(cid:127) our  ability  to  compete  against  companies  that  are  larger  and  have  greater  financial,  technical  and  human
resources than we do, as well as other competitive factors, such as technological advances achieved, patents
obtained and new products introduced  by our competitors;

(cid:127) our  ability  to  identify,  finance,  acquire,  close  and  integrate  acquisition  targets  successfully  and  on  a  timely

basis;

(cid:127) factors relating to the acquisition and integration of the companies, businesses and products acquired by the
Company, such as the time and resources required to integrate such companies, businesses and products, the
difficulties  associated  with  such  integrations  (including  potential  disruptions  in  sales  activities  and  potential
challenges  with  information  technology  systems  integrations),  the  difficulties  and  challenges  associated  with
entering into new business areas and new geographic markets, the difficulties, challenges and costs associated
with  managing  and  integrating  new  facilities,  equipment  and  other  assets,  and  the  achievement  of  the
anticipated benefits from such integrations, as well as risks associated with the acquired companies, businesses
and products;

(cid:127) factors  relating  to  our  ability  to  achieve  all  of  the  estimated  synergies  from  our  acquisitions  as  a  result  of
cost-rationalization  and  integration  initiatives.  These  factors  may  include  greater  than  expected  operating
costs, the difficulty in eliminating certain duplicative costs, facilities and functions, and the outcome of many
operational and strategic decisions, some of which have not yet  been made;

(cid:127) factors relating to our proposed acquisition of Salix, including our ability to consummate such transaction on
a  timely  basis,  if  at  all;  the  impact  of  substantial  additional  debt  on  our  financial  condition  and  results  of
operations; our ability to effectively and timely integrate the operations of the Company and Salix; our ability
to  achieve  the  estimated  synergies  from  this  proposed  transaction;  and,  once  integrated,  the  effects  of  such
business combination on our future financial condition, operating results, strategy  and plans;

(cid:127) our ability to secure and maintain third party research, development, manufacturing, marketing or distribution

arrangements;

ii

(cid:127) our  eligibility  for  benefits  under  tax  treaties  and  the  continued  availability  of  low  effective  tax  rates  for  the

business profits of certain of our subsidiaries;

(cid:127) our  substantial  debt  and  debt  service  obligations  and  their  impact  on  our  financial  condition  and  results  of

operations;

(cid:127) our future cash flow, our ability to service and repay our existing debt, our ability to raise additional funds, if
needed, and any restrictions that are or may be imposed as a result of our current and future indebtedness, in
light of our current and projected levels of operations, acquisition activity and general economic conditions;

(cid:127) any downgrade by rating agencies in our corporate credit ratings, which may impact, among other things, our

ability to raise additional debt capital and implement elements  of  our growth strategy;

(cid:127) interest rate risks associated with our floating rate  debt  borrowings;

(cid:127) the risks associated with the international scope of our operations, including our presence in emerging markets
and  the  challenges  we  face  when  entering  new  geographic  markets  (including  the  challenges  created  by  new
and different regulatory regimes in such countries);

(cid:127) adverse  global  economic  conditions  and  credit  market  and  foreign  currency  exchange  uncertainty  in  the
countries in which we do business (such as the recent instability  in Russia, Ukraine and the Middle East);

(cid:127) economic  factors  over  which  the  Company  has  no  control,  including  changes  in  inflation,  interest  rates,
foreign currency rates, and the potential  effect of such factors on  revenues, expenses and resulting margins;

(cid:127) the introduction of generic competitors of our  branded products;

(cid:127) our ability to obtain and maintain sufficient intellectual property rights over our products and defend against

challenges to such intellectual property;

(cid:127) the outcome of legal proceedings, arbitrations, investigations and  regulatory proceedings;

(cid:127) the risk that our products could cause, or be alleged to cause, personal injury and adverse effects, leading to
potential lawsuits, product liability claims  and damages  and/or withdrawals of  products from the market;

(cid:127) the  availability  of  and  our  ability  to  obtain  and  maintain  adequate  insurance  coverage  and/or  our  ability  to
cover  or  insure  against  the  total  amount  of  the  claims  and  liabilities  we  face,  whether  through  third  party
insurance or self-insurance;

(cid:127) the  difficulty  in  predicting  the  expense,  timing  and  outcome  within  our  legal  and  regulatory  environment,
including  with  respect  to  approvals  by  the  U.S.  Food  and  Drug  Administration,  Health  Canada  and  similar
agencies in other countries, legal and regulatory proceedings and settlements thereof, the protection afforded by
our patents and other intellectual and proprietary property, successful generic challenges to our products and
infringement or alleged infringement of  the intellectual property of  others;

(cid:127) the results of continuing safety and efficacy studies by industry and government  agencies;

(cid:127) the  availability  and  extent  to  which  our  products  are  reimbursed  by  government  authorities  and  other  third
party  payors,  as  well  as  the  impact  of  obtaining  or  maintaining  such  reimbursement  on  the  price  of  our
products;

(cid:127) the inclusion of our products on formularies or our ability to achieve favorable formulary status, as well as the

impact on the price of our products in connection therewith;

(cid:127) the impact of price control restrictions  on our products,  including the risk  of mandated  price reductions;

(cid:127) the success of preclinical and clinical trials for our drug development pipeline or delays in clinical trials that
adversely  impact  the  timely  commercialization  of  our  pipeline  products,  as  well  as  factors  impacting  the
commercial success of our currently marketed  products, which could  lead  to material impairment charges;

(cid:127) the results of management reviews of our research and development portfolio, conducted periodically and in
connection with certain acquisitions, the decisions from which could result in terminations of specific projects
which, in turn, could lead to material  impairment charges;

iii

(cid:127) negative publicity or reputational harm to  our products and  business;

(cid:127) the uncertainties associated with the acquisition and launch of new products, including, but not limited to, the
acceptance  and  demand  for  new  pharmaceutical  products,  and  the  impact  of  competitive  products  and
pricing;

(cid:127) our  ability  to  obtain  components,  raw  materials  or  finished  products  supplied  by  third  parties  and  other

manufacturing and related supply difficulties, interruptions and delays;

(cid:127) the disruption of delivery of our products and the  routine flow  of manufactured goods;

(cid:127) the seasonality of sales of certain of our products;

(cid:127) declines in the pricing and sales volume of certain of our products that are  distributed or marketed by third

parties, over which we have no or limited control;

(cid:127) compliance  with,  or  the  failure  to  comply  with,  health  care  ‘‘fraud  and  abuse’’  laws  and  other  extensive
regulation  of  our  marketing,  promotional  and  pricing  practices,  worldwide  anti-bribery  laws  (including  the
U.S.  Foreign  Corrupt  Practices  Act),  worldwide  environmental  laws  and  regulation  and  privacy  and  security
regulations;

(cid:127) the  impacts  of  the  Patient  Protection  and  Affordable  Care  Act  (as  amended)  and  other  legislative  and

regulatory healthcare reforms in the countries in which we operate;

(cid:127) interruptions, breakdowns or breaches in our information technology systems; and

(cid:127) other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘SEC’’)  and  the  Canadian  Securities  Administrators  (the  ‘‘CSA’’),  as  well  as  our  ability  to  anticipate  and
manage the risks associated with the foregoing.

Additional  information  about  these  factors  and  about  the  material  factors  or  assumptions  underlying  such
forward-looking  statements  may  be  found  elsewhere  in  this  Form  10-K,  under  Item  1A.  ‘‘Risk  Factors’’  and  in  the
Company’s other filings with the SEC and CSA. When relying on our forward-looking statements to make decisions
with  respect  to  the  Company,  investors  and  others  should  carefully  consider  the  foregoing  factors  and  other
uncertainties and potential events. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. We undertake
no obligation to update or revise any of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the
date of this Form 10-K or to reflect actual outcomes, except as required by law. We caution that, as it is not possible to
predict  or  identify  all  relevant  factors  that  may  impact  forward-looking  statements,  the  foregoing  list  of  important
factors  that  may  affect  future  results  is  not  exhaustive  and  should  not  be  considered  a  complete  statement  of  all
potential risks and uncertainties.

iv

Item 1. Business

PART I

Biovail Corporation (‘‘Biovail’’) was formed under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on February 18,
2000, as a result of the amalgamation of TXM Corporation and Biovail Corporation International. Biovail was
continued  under  the  Canada  Business  Corporations  Act  (the  ‘‘CBCA’’)  effective  June  29,  2005.  In  connection
with  the  acquisition  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International  (‘‘Valeant’’)  in  September  2010,  Biovail  was
renamed ‘‘Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.’’

Effective August 9, 2013, we continued from the federal jurisdiction of Canada to the Province of British
Columbia, meaning that we became a company registered under the laws of the Province of British Columbia as
if we had been incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia. As a result of this continuance,
our legal domicile became the Province of British Columbia, the Canada Business Corporations Act ceased to
apply  to us and we became subject to  the  British Columbia Business  Corporations Act.

Unless  the  context  indicates  otherwise,  when  we  refer  to  ‘‘we’’,  ‘‘us’’,  ‘‘our’’  or  the  ‘‘Company’’  in  this
Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  (‘‘Form  10-K’’),  we  are  referring  to  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.
and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

Introduction

We are a multinational, specialty pharmaceutical and medical device company that develops, manufactures,
and  markets  a  broad  range  of  branded,  generic  and  branded  generic  pharmaceuticals,  over-the-counter
(‘‘OTC’’) products, and medical devices (contact lenses, intraocular lenses, ophthalmic surgical equipment, and
aesthetics devices), which are marketed directly or indirectly in over 100 countries. In the Developed Markets
segment, we focus most of our efforts in the eye health, dermatology and neurology therapeutic classes. In the
Emerging  Markets  segment,  we  focus  primarily  on  branded  generics,  OTC  products,  and  medical  devices.  We
are diverse not only in our sources of revenue from our broad drug and medical device portfolio, but also among
the therapeutic classes and geographies we  serve.

Business  Strategy

Our  strategy  is  to  focus  our  business  on  core  geographies  and  therapeutic  classes  that  offer  attractive
growth  opportunities  while  maintaining  our  lower  selling,  general  and  administrative  cost  model  and
decentralized operating structure. We have an established portfolio of durable products with a focus in the eye
health  and  dermatology  therapeutic  areas.  We  believe  these  products  have  the  potential  for  strong  operating
margins and solid growth and are particularly attractive for  a number of reasons including:

(cid:127) They  are  largely  cash  pay,  or  are  reimbursed  through  private  insurance,  and,  as  a  result,  are  less

dependent on increasing government  reimbursement pressures than other products;

(cid:127) They tend to have established brand names and do not rely primarily on patent or regulatory exclusivity;

(cid:127) They tend to have the potential for  line  extensions and life-cycle management programs; and

(cid:127) They  tend  to  be  smaller  on  an  individual  basis,  and  therefore  typically  not  the  focus  of  larger

pharmaceutical companies.

Another  critical  element  of  our  strategy  is  business  development.  We  have  completed  numerous
transactions over the past few years to expand our portfolio offering and geographic footprint, including, among
others,  the  acquisitions  of  Bausch  &  Lomb  Holdings  Incorporated  (‘‘B&L’’)  and  Medicis  Pharmaceutical
Corporation  (‘‘Medicis’’).  We  will  continue  to  pursue  value-added  business  development  opportunities  as  they
arise.

The  growth  of  our  business  is  further  augmented  through  our  lower  risk,  output-focused  research  and
development model. This model allows us to advance certain development programs to drive future commercial
growth, while minimizing our research  and  development expense.  This is  achieved primarily by:

(cid:127) focusing on innovation through our internal research and development, acquisitions, and in-licensing;

1

(cid:127) focusing  on  productivity  through  measures  such  as  leveraging  industry  overcapacity  and  outsourcing

commodity services;

(cid:127) focusing on critical skills and capabilities needed to bring new  technologies  to  the market;

(cid:127) pursuing  life-cycle  management  programs  for  currently  marketed  products  to  increase  such  products’

value during their commercial lives; and

(cid:127) acquiring  dossiers  and  registrations  for  branded  generic  products,  which  require  limited  manufacturing

start-up  and development activities.

In  addition  to  selective  acquisitions  and  product  development,  our  strategy  also  involves  deploying  cash

through debt repayments and repurchases, as well as share buybacks.

We believe this strategy will allow us to maximize both the growth rate and profitability of the Company and

to enhance shareholder value.

Segment Information

We  have  two  operating  and  reportable  segments:  (i)  Developed  Markets  and  (ii)  Emerging  Markets.
Comparative  segment  information  for  2014,  2013  and  2012  is  presented  in  note  22  of  notes  to  consolidated
financial statements in Item 15 of this Form 10-K.

Our current product portfolio comprises  approximately  1,600 products.

Developed Markets

The  Developed  Markets  segment  consists  of  (i)  sales  in  the  U.S.  of  pharmaceutical  products,  OTC
products,  and  medical  device  products,  as  well  as  alliance  and  contract  service  revenues,  in  the  areas  of  eye
health,  dermatology  and  podiatry,  aesthetics,  and  dentistry,  (ii)  sales  in  the  U.S.  of  pharmaceutical  products
indicated for the treatment of neurological and other diseases, as well as alliance revenue from the licensing of
various  products  we  developed  or  acquired,  and  (iii)  pharmaceutical  products,  OTC  products,  and  medical
device products sold in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Western Europe  and Japan.

Pharmaceutical Products — Our principal pharmaceutical products are:

(cid:127) An Acne franchise, which includes Solodyn(cid:4), a prescription oral antibiotic approved to treat only the red,
pus-filled  pimples  of  moderate  to  severe  acne  in  patients  12  years  of  age  and  older,  as  well  as  Ziana(cid:4),
Acanya(cid:4),  Atralin(cid:4),  Retin-A  Micro(cid:4)  Microsphere  0.08%  and  ONEXTON(cid:5)  Gel,  a  fixed  combination
1.2%  clindamycin  phosphate  and  3.75%  benzoyl  peroxide  medication  for  the  once-daily  treatment  of
comedonal (non-inflammatory) and inflammatory acne in patients 12  years of age and  older.

(cid:127) Wellbutrin  XL(cid:4)  is  an  extended-release  formulation  of  bupropion  indicated  for  the  treatment  of  major

depressive disorder in adults.

(cid:127) Jublia(cid:4)  (efinaconazole  10%  topical  solution),  is  a  topical  azole  approved  for  the  treatment  of

onychomycosis of the toenails (toenail fungus).

(cid:127) Xenazine(cid:4)  is  indicated  for  the  treatment  of  chorea  associated  with  Huntington’s  disease.  In  the  U.S.,
Xenazine(cid:4) is distributed for us by Lundbeck Inc. under an exclusive marketing, distribution and supply
agreement.

(cid:127) Targretin(cid:4) Capsules is a retinoid indicated for treatment of Cutaneous  T-Cell Lymphoma.
(cid:127) Arestin(cid:4)  (minocycline  hydrochloride)  is  a  subgingival  sustained-release  antibiotic.  Arestin(cid:4)  is  indicated
as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) procedures for reduction of pocket depth in patients with
adult periodontitis. Arestin(cid:4) may be used as part of a periodontal maintenance program, which includes
good oral hygiene and SRP.

(cid:127) Zovirax(cid:4)  is  a  prescription  topical  antiviral  which  is  active  against  herpes  viruses.  Zovirax(cid:4)  Cream  is
indicated for the treatment of recurrent herpes labialis (cold sores) in adults and adolescents (12 years of
age and older). Zovirax(cid:4) Ointment is indicated for the management of initial genital  herpes.

2

(cid:127) Syprine(cid:4) is a chelating agent indicated for treatment of patients with Wilson’s disease (disorder of copper

metabolism) who are intolerant of the  first-line treatment.

(cid:127) Elidel(cid:4)  is  a  topical  formulation  used  to  treat  mild  to  moderate  atopic  dermatitis,  a  form  of  eczema.
Elidel(cid:4)  Cream  1%  is  indicated  as  second-line  therapy  for  the  short-term  and  non-continuous  chronic
treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in nonimmunocompromised adults and children 2 years
of age and older, who have failed to respond adequately to other topical prescription treatments, or when
those treatments are not advisable.

(cid:127) Prolensa(cid:4)  is  a  non-steroidal  anti-inflammatory  ophthalmic  solution  for  the  treatment  of  inflammation

and pain following cataract surgery.

(cid:127) Duromine(cid:4) is a weight loss drug that acts through appetite suppression. Duromine(cid:4) contains the active

ingredient, phentermine, in a once daily formulation.

(cid:127) Lotemax(cid:4) Gel is a topical corticosteroid indicated for the treatment of post-operative inflammation and
pain  following  ocular  surgery.  This  formulation  is  a  technology  that  allows  the  drug  to  adhere  to  the
ocular  surface  and  offers  dose  uniformity,  which  eliminates  the  need  to  shake  the  product  in  order  to
ensure the drug is in suspension, a low concentration of preservative, and  two known moisturizers.

OTC Products — Our principal OTC products are:

(cid:127) PreserVision(cid:4) is an antioxidant eye vitamin and mineral supplement.
(cid:127) CeraVe(cid:4)  is  a  range  of  OTC  products  with  essential  ceramides  and  other  skin-nourishing  and
ingredients  (humectants  and  emollients)  combined  with  a  unique,  patented
skin-moisturizing 
Multivesicular Emulsion (MVE(cid:4)) delivery technology that, together, work to rebuild and repair the skin
barrier.  CeraVe(cid:4)  formulations  incorporate  ceramides,  cholesterol  and  fatty  acids,  all  of  which  are
essential  for  skin  barrier  repair  and  are  used  as  adjunct  therapy  in  the  management  of  various  skin
conditions.

(cid:127) ReNu  Multiplus(cid:4)  is  a  sterile,  preserved  solution  used  to  lubricate  and  rewet  soft  (hydrophilic)  contact
lenses.  ReNu  Multiplus(cid:4)  product  contains  povidone,  a  lubricant  that  can  be  used  with  daily,  overnight,
and disposable soft contact lenses.

(cid:127) Biotrue(cid:4)  multi-purpose  solution  uses  a  lubricant  also  found  in  eyes  and  it  is  pH  balanced  to  match
healthy tears and helps prevent certain tear proteins from denaturing and fights germs for healthy contact
lens wear.

(cid:127) Ocuvite(cid:4) is a lutein eye vitamin and mineral supplement that contains lutein (an antioxidant carotenoid),

a nutrient that supports macular health  by helping filter harmful blue light.

(cid:127) Boston(cid:4) solution is a specialty cleansing solution design  for gas permeable (GP)  contact lenses.
(cid:127) Artelac(cid:5)  is a solution in the form of eye drops to treat  dry eyes caused by chronic tear dysfunction.

Device Products — Our principal device products are:

(cid:127) SofLens(cid:4) Daily Disposable Contact Lenses use ComfortMoist(cid:4) Technology (a combination of thin lens
design  and  slow  releasing  packaging  solution)  and  High  Definition  Optics(cid:5),  an  aspheric  design  that
reduces aspheric aberration over the range  of powers.

(cid:127) PureVision(cid:4) is a Silicone Hydrogel Frequent Replacement Contact Lens using AerGel(cid:5) material (which
allows  natural  levels  of  oxygen  to  reach  the  eyes  and  resists  protein  buildup),  and  an  aspheric  optical
design.

(cid:127) Various ophthalmic surgical products, including intraocular lenses such as Akreos(cid:4) and Crystalens(cid:4), and
surgical  equipment  products  such  as  the  VICTUS(cid:4)  femtosecond  laser  and  the  Stellaris(cid:4)  PC,  a
vitreoretinal and cataract surgery system.

3

(cid:127) Biotrue(cid:4) ONEday lens is made from the bio-inspired material HyperGel(cid:5) that mimics the actions of the
natural tear film, matches the water content of the eye, and meets the oxygen needs of the eye for daily
wear  of contact lenses.

(cid:127) Medical device systems for aesthetic applications, acquired as part of the Solta Medical, Inc. acquisition
in  January  2014,  including  the  Thermage  CPT(cid:4)  system  that  provides  non-invasive  treatment  options
using radiofrequency energy for skin  tightening.

(cid:127) Bausch + Lomb Ultra(cid:4) is a silicone hydrogel contact lens, with MoistureSeal(cid:4) technology. MoistureSeal(cid:4)
is  a  unique  combination  of  material  chemistry  and  production  process  that  retain  moisture  throughout
the day,  which can help reduce blurriness or visual fluctuations associated  with lens dryness.

Generic Products — Our principal branded and other generic products are:

(cid:127) Tobramycin and Dexamethasone ophthalmic suspension is indicated for steroid responsive inflammatory
ocular conditions where superficial bacterial ocular infection or a risk of bacterial ocular infection exists.
(cid:127) Cardizem(cid:4) CD is a calcium channel blocker used to treat hypertension (high blood pressure) and angina

(chest pain).

(cid:127) Retin-A Micro(cid:4) (tretinoin gel) microsphere, 0.04%/0.1% Pump, is an oil-free prescription-strength acne

treatment.

(cid:127) Latanoprost is one of a group of medicines known as prostaglandins and is indicated to treat a type of

glaucoma called open angle glaucoma  and  also ocular hypertension.

Other  Revenues — We  generate  alliance  revenue  and  service  revenue  from  the  licensing  of  products  and  from
contract services mainly in the areas of dermatology and topical medication. Contract service revenue is derived
primarily from contract manufacturing for third parties.

Emerging Markets

The  Emerging  Markets  segment  consists  of  branded  generic  pharmaceutical  products  and  branded
pharmaceuticals,  OTC  products,  and  medical  device  products.  Products  are  sold  primarily  in  Central  and
Eastern Europe (primarily Poland and Russia), Asia, Latin America (Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina and exports
out of Mexico to other Latin American  markets), Africa and the Middle  East.

Branded  and  Other  Generic  Products  and  Branded  Pharmaceuticals — Our  branded  generics  and  branded
pharmaceuticals  businesses  in  Europe,  the  Middle  East,  Asia,  and  Latin  America  cover  a  broad  range  of
treatments,  including  antibiotics,  treatments  for  cardiovascular  and  neurological  diseases,  dermatological
products, diabetic therapies, and eye health  products,  among  many  others.

OTC — Our principal OTC products are:

(cid:127) ReNu  Multiplus(cid:4)  is  a  sterile,  preserved  solution  used  to  lubricate  and  rewet  soft  (hydrophilic)  contact
lenses.  ReNu  Multiplus(cid:4)  product  contains  povidone,  a  lubricant  that  can  be  used  with  daily,  overnight,
and disposable soft contact lenses.

(cid:127) AntiGrippin(cid:4) is for symptomatic treatment of acute respiratory diseases, acute respiratory viral diseases,

and influenza.

(cid:127) Ocuvite(cid:4) is a lutein eye vitamin and mineral supplement that contains lutein (an antioxidant carotenoid),

a nutrient that supports macular health  by helping filter harmful blue light.

(cid:127) Bedoyecta(cid:4) is a brand of vitamin B complex (B1, B6 and B12 vitamins) products. Bedoyecta(cid:4) products
act as energy improvement agents for fatigue related to age or chronic diseases, and as nervous system
maintenance agents to treat neurotic pain and neuropathy. Bedoyecta(cid:4) is sold in an injectable form, as
well as in a tablet  form.

4

Device Products — Our principal device products are:

(cid:127) SofLens(cid:4) Daily Disposable Contact Lenses use ComfortMoist(cid:4) Technology (a combination of thin lens
design  and  slow  releasing  packaging  solution)  and  High  Definition  Optics(cid:5),  an  aspheric  design  that
reduces aspheric aberration over the range  of powers.

(cid:127) Various  ophthalmic  surgical  products  including  intraocular  lenses  such  as  Akreos(cid:4),  and  surgical
equipment products such as the VICTUS(cid:4) femtosecond laser and the Stellaris(cid:4) PC, a vitreoretinal and
cataract surgery system.

(cid:127) PureVision(cid:4) is a Silicone Hydrogel Frequent Replacement Contact Lens using AerGel(cid:5) material (which
allows  natural  levels  of  oxygen  to  reach  the  eyes  and  resists  protein  buildup),  and  an  aspheric  optical
design.

(cid:127) Medical  device  systems  for  aesthetic  applications,  acquired  as  part  of  the  Solta  Medical  acquisition  in
January 2014, including the Thermage CPT(cid:4) system that provides non-invasive treatment options using
radiofrequency energy for skin tightening.

Research and Development

Our  research  and  development  (‘‘R&D’’)  organization  focuses  on  the  development  of  products  through
clinical trials. Our research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
were  $246.0  million,  $156.8  million  and  $79.1  million,  respectively,  excluding  impairment  charges.  As  of
December 31, 2014, approximately 800 employees (including regulatory affairs and quality assurance employees)
were involved in our R&D efforts.

For  more  information  regarding  our  products  in  clinical  development,  see  Item  7  titled  ‘‘Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Products in Development’’ of this
Form 10-K.

Trademarks, Patents and Proprietary Rights

We  rely  on  a  combination  of  contractual  provisions,  confidentiality  policies  and  procedures  and  patent,
trademark, copyright and trade secrecy laws to protect the proprietary aspects of our technology and business.
Our  policy  is  to  vigorously  protect,  enforce  and  defend  our  rights  to  our  intellectual  property  and  proprietary
rights, as appropriate.

Trademarks

We believe that trademark protection is an important part of establishing product and brand recognition.
We  own  or  license  a  number  of  registered  trademarks  and  trademark  applications  in  the  U.S.,  Canada  and  in
various  other  countries  throughout  the  world.  U.S.  federal  registrations  for  trademarks  remain  in  force  for
10 years and may be renewed every 10 years after issuance, provided the mark is still being used in commerce.
Trademark  registrations  in  Canada  remain  in  force  for  15  years  and  may  be  renewed  every  15  years  after
issuance,  provided  that,  as  in  the  case  of  U.S.  federal  trademark  registrations,  the  mark  is  still  being  used  in
commerce.  Other  countries  generally  have  similar  but  varying  terms  and  renewal  policies  with  respect  to
trademarks registered in those countries.

Data and Patent Exclusivity

For certain of our products, we rely on a combination of regulatory and patent rights to protect the value of

our  investment in the development of  these products.

A patent is the grant of a property right which allows its holder to exclude others from, among other things,
selling the subject invention in, or importing such invention into, the jurisdiction that granted the patent. In the
U.S., Canada and the European Union (‘‘EU’’), generally patents expire 20 years from the date of application.
We have obtained, acquired or in-licensed a number of patents and patent applications covering key aspects of
our  principal  products.  In  the  aggregate,  our  patents  are  of  material  importance  to  our  business  taken  as  a
whole. However, we do not consider any  single  patent  material  to  our business  as a whole.

5

In the U.S., the Hatch-Waxman Act provides non-patent regulatory exclusivity for five years from the date
of the first FDA approval of a new drug compound in a New Drug Application (‘‘NDA’’). The FDA, with one
exception, is prohibited during those five years from accepting for filing a generic, or ANDA, that references the
NDA. In reference to the foregoing exception, if a patent is indexed in the FDA Orange Book for the new drug
compound, a generic may file an ANDA four years from the NDA approval date if it also files a Paragraph IV
Certification with the FDA challenging the patent. Protection under the Hatch-Waxman Act will not prevent the
filing  or  approval  of  another  full  NDA.  However,  the  NDA  applicant  would  be  required  to  conduct  its  own
pre-clinical  and  adequate  and  well-controlled  clinical  trials  to  independently  demonstrate  safety  and
effectiveness.

A  similar  data  exclusivity  scheme  exists  in  the  EU,  whereby  only  the  pioneer  drug  company  can  use  data
obtained  at  the  pioneer’s  expense  for  up  to  eight  years  from  the  date  of  the  first  approval  of  a  drug  by  the
European Medicines Agency (‘‘EMA’’) and no generic drug can be marketed for ten years from the approval of
the  innovator  product.  Under  both  the  U.S.  and  the  EU  data  exclusivity  programs,  products  without  patent
protection  can  be  marketed  by  others  so  long  as  they  repeat  the  clinical  trials  necessary  to  show  safety  and
efficacy. Canada employs a similar data exclusivity regulatory regime for  innovative drugs.

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a product as an orphan drug if it is a drug intended to
treat  a  disease  or  condition  that  affects  populations  of  fewer  than  200,000  individuals  in  the  U.S.  or  a  disease
whose  incidence  rates  number  more  than  200,000  where  the  sponsor  establishes  that  it  does  not  realistically
anticipate that its product sales will be sufficient to recover its costs. The sponsor that obtains the first marketing
approval for a designated orphan drug for a given rare disease is eligible to receive marketing exclusivity for use
of that drug for the orphan indication for  a  period  of seven years.

Proprietary Know-How

We  also  rely  upon  unpatented  proprietary  know-how,  trade  secrets  and  technological  innovation  in  the
development and manufacture of many of our principal products. We protect our proprietary rights through a
variety of methods, including confidentiality agreements and proprietary information agreements with vendors,
employees, consultants and others who may have  access to proprietary information.

Government Regulations

Government authorities in the U.S., at the federal, state and local level, in Canada, in the EU and in other
countries extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, approval, manufacturing,
labeling,  post-approval  monitoring  and  reporting,  packaging,  advertising  and  promotion,  storage,  distribution,
marketing  and  export  and  import  of  pharmaceutical  products  and  medical  devices.  As  such,  our  products  and
product candidates are subject to extensive regulation both before and after approval. The process of obtaining
regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes and
regulations  require  the  expenditure  of  substantial  time  and  financial  resources.  Failure  to  comply  with  these
regulations could result in, among other things, warning letters, civil penalties, delays in approving or refusal to
approve a product candidate, product recall, product seizure, interruption of production, operating restrictions,
suspension or withdrawal of product  approval, injunctions or criminal  prosecution.

Prior  to  human  use,  FDA  approval  must  be  obtained  in  the  U.S.,  approval  by  Health  Canada  must  be
obtained in Canada, EMA approval (drugs) or a CE Marking (devices) must be obtained for countries that are
part  of  the  EU  and  approval  must  be  obtained  from  comparable  agencies  in  other  countries  prior  to
manufacturing or marketing new pharmaceutical products or  medical devices.

Regulation  by  other  federal  agencies,  such  as  the  Drug  Enforcement  Administration  (‘‘DEA’’),  and  state
and local authorities in the U.S., and by comparable agencies in certain foreign countries, is also required. In the
U.S., the FTC, the FDA and state and local authorities regulate the advertising of medical devices, prescription
drugs, over-the-counter drugs and cosmetics. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended and the
regulations promulgated thereunder, and other federal and state statutes and regulations, govern, among other
things,  the  testing,  manufacture,  safety,  effectiveness,  labeling,  storage,  record  keeping,  approval,  sale,
distribution,  advertising  and  promotion  of  our  products.  The  FDA  requires  a  Boxed  Warning  (sometimes
referred  to  as  a  ‘‘Black  Box’’  Warning)  for  products  that  have  shown  a  significant  risk  of  severe  or

6

life-threatening adverse events and similar warnings are also required to be displayed on the product in certain
other jurisdictions.

Manufacturers of pharmaceutical products and medical devices are required to comply with manufacturing
regulations,  including  current  good  manufacturing  practices  and  quality  system  management  requirements,
enforced by the FDA and Health Canada, in the U.S. and Canada respectively, and similar regulations enforced
by  regulatory  agencies  in  other  countries.  In  addition,  we  are  subject  to  price  control  restrictions  on  our
pharmaceutical products in many countries  in which we  operate.

We  are  also  subject  to  extensive  U.S.  federal  and  state  health  care  marketing  and  fraud  and  abuse
regulations,  such  as  the  federal  False  Claims  Act,  federal  and  provincial  marketing  regulation  in  Canada  and
similar  regulations  in  foreign  countries  in  which  we  may  conduct  our  business.  The  federal  False  Claims  Act
imposes  civil  and  criminal  liability  on  individuals  or  entities  who  submit  (or  cause  the  submission  of)  false  or
fraudulent claims for payment to the government. The U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons or
entities  from  knowingly  and  willfully  soliciting,  receiving,  offering  or  providing  remuneration,  directly  or
indirectly,  to  induce  either  the  referral  of  an  individual,  or  the  furnishing,  recommending,  or  arranging  for  a
good or service, for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as the Medicare and
Medicaid  programs.  Due  to  recent  legislative  changes,  violations  of  the  Anti-Kickback  Statute  also  carry
potential  federal  False  Claims  Act  liability.  In  addition,  in  the  U.S.,  companies  may  not  promote  drugs  or
medical devices for ‘‘off-label’’ uses — that is, uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and that differ
from  those  that  were  approved  or  cleared  by  the  FDA  —  and  ‘‘off-label  promotion’’  has  also  formed  the
predicate  for  False  Claims  Act  liability  resulting  in  significant  financial  settlements.  These  and  other  laws  and
regulations,  rules  and  policies  may  significantly  impact  the  manner  in  which  we  are  permitted  to  market  our
products. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws, regulations, rules or policies or any
other law or governmental regulation, or if interpretations of the foregoing change, we may be subject to civil
and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the curtailment
or restructuring of our operations.

Environmental Regulation

Our  facilities  and  operations  are  subject  to  national,  federal,  state  and  local  environmental  and
occupational health and safety laws and regulations in both the U.S. and countries outside the U.S., including
those governing the discharges of substances into the air, water and land, the handling, storage and disposal of
hazardous wastes, wastewater and solid waste, the cleanup of properties affected by known pollutants and other
environmental  matters.  Certain  of  our  development  and  manufacturing  activities  involve  the  controlled  use  of
hazardous  materials.  We  believe  we  are  in  compliance  in  all  material  respects  with  applicable  environmental
laws and regulations. Existing environmental protection legislation and regulations, and compliance therewith,
have had no material adverse effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. Although we
continue  to  make  capital  expenditures  for  environmental  protection,  we  do  not  anticipate  any  significant
expenditures  in  order  to  comply  with  such  laws  and  regulations  that  would  have  a  material  impact  on  our
earnings or competitive position. We are not aware of any pending litigation or significant financial obligations
arising  from  current  or  past  environmental  practices  that  are  likely  to  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our
financial  position.  We  cannot  assure,  however,  that  environmental  problems  relating  to  facilities  owned  or
operated by us will not develop in the future, and we cannot predict whether any such problems, if they were to
develop,  would  require  significant  expenditures  on  our  part.  In  addition,  we  are  unable  to  predict  what
legislation or regulations may be adopted or enacted in the future with respect to environmental protection and
waste disposal.

Marketing and Customers

Our  top  four  geographic  markets  by  country,  based  on  2014  revenue,  are:  the  U.S.  and  Puerto  Rico,
Canada,  Poland  and  Russia,  which  represent  54%,  5%,  3%  and  3%  of  our  total  revenue  for  the  year  ended
December 31, 2014, respectively.

7

The  following  table  identifies  external  customers  that  accounted  for  10%  or  more  of  our  total  revenue

during the year ended December 31, 2014:

Percentage of
Total Revenue
2014

McKesson Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AmerisourceBergen Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17%
10%

No other customer generated over 10% of  our  total  revenues.

We  currently  promote  our  pharmaceutical  products  to  physicians,  hospitals,  pharmacies  and  wholesalers
through our own sales force and sell through wholesalers. In some limited markets, we additionally sell directly
to physicians, hospitals and large drug store chains and we sell through distributors in countries where we do not
have  our  own  sales  staff.  As  part  of  our  marketing  program  for  pharmaceuticals,  we  use  direct  to  customer
advertising, direct mailings, advertise in trade and medical periodicals, exhibit products at medical conventions
and sponsor medical education symposia.

Competition

Competitive Landscape for Products and  Products in  Development

The pharmaceutical and medical device industries are highly competitive. Our competitors include specialty
and  other  large  pharmaceutical  companies,  medical  device  companies,  biotechnology  companies,  OTC
companies and generic manufacturers, in the U.S., Canada, Europe, Asia, Latin America and in other countries
in which we market our products. The market for eye health products is very competitive, both across product
categories and geographies. In addition to larger diversified pharmaceutical and medical device companies, we
face competition in the eye health market from mid-size and smaller, regional and entrepreneurial companies
with fewer products in niche areas or regions. The dermatology competitive landscape is highly fragmented, with
a large number of mid-size and smaller companies competing in both the prescription sector and the OTC and
cosmeceutical sectors.

Our competitors are pursuing the development and/or acquisition of pharmaceuticals, medical devices and
OTC  products  that  target  the  same  diseases  and  conditions  that  we  are  targeting  in  eye  health,  dermatology,
neurology,  podiatry,  aesthetics,  dentistry  and  other  therapeutic  areas.  Academic  and  other  research  and
development  institutions  may  also  develop  products  or  technologies  that  compete  with  our  products,  which
technologies and products may be acquired or licensed by our competitors. These competitors may have greater
financial, R&D or marketing resources than we do. If competitors introduce new products, delivery systems or
processes  with  therapeutic  or  cost  advantages,  our  products  can  be  subject  to  progressive  price  reductions  or
decreased  volume  of  sales,  or  both.  Most  new  products  that  we  introduce  must  compete  with  other  products
already on the market or products that are later developed by  competitors.

We  sell  a  broad  range  of  products,  and  competitive  factors  vary  by  product  line  and  geographic  area  in
which  the  products  are  sold.  The  principal  methods  of  competition  for  our  products  include  quality,  efficacy,
market acceptance, price, and marketing and promotional efforts.

Generic Competition

We  face  increased  competition  from  manufacturers  of  generic  pharmaceutical  products  when  patents
covering certain of our currently marketed products expire or are successfully challenged or when the regulatory
exclusivity  for  our  products  expires  or  it  is  otherwise  lost.  Generic  versions  are  generally  significantly  less
expensive  than  branded  versions,  and,  where  available,  may  be  required  in  preference  to  the  branded  version
under  third  party  reimbursement  programs,  or  substituted  by  pharmacies.  Manufacturers  of  generic
pharmaceuticals  typically  invest  far  less  in  research  and  development  than  research-based  pharmaceutical
companies and therefore can price their products significantly lower than branded products. Accordingly, when
a branded product loses its market exclusivity, it normally faces intense price competition from generic forms of
the  product.  To  successfully  compete  for  business  with  managed  care  and  pharmacy  benefits  management

8

organizations,  we  must  often  demonstrate  that  our  products  offer  not  only  medical  benefits  but  also  cost
advantages as compared with other forms  of care.

A number of our products already face generic competition, including, among others, Vanos(cid:4) (in the U.S.),
Wellbutrin XL(cid:4) (in the U.S. and Canada), Zovirax(cid:4) ointment, Retin-A Micro(cid:4) and Carac(cid:4), all of which faced
generic  competitors  during  2014.  In  addition,  certain  of  our  products  face  the  expiration  of  their  patent  or
regulatory  exclusivity  in  2015  or  in  later  years,  following  which  we  anticipate  generic  competition  of  these
products. In addition, in certain cases, as a result of negotiated settlements of some of our patent infringement
proceedings against generic competitors, we have granted licenses to such generic companies, which will permit
them  to  enter  the  market  with  their  generic  products  prior  to  the  expiration  of  our  applicable  patent  or
regulatory  exclusivity.  Our  products  facing  a  potential  loss  of  exclusivity  in  2015  and  in  later  years  include,
among  others,  the  following:  in  2015,  Xenazine(cid:4)  and  Targretin(cid:4)  Capusles;  in  2016,  Ziana(cid:4),  Zirgan(cid:4)  and
Visudyne(cid:4); in 2017, Lotemax(cid:4) Gel and Macugen(cid:4); in 2018, Acanya(cid:4) Gel, Solodyn(cid:4) and Istalol(cid:4); and in 2019,
Zyclara(cid:4).

In addition, for a number of our products, we have commenced infringement proceedings against potential
generic competitors in the U.S. and Canada. If we are not successful in these proceedings, we may face increased
generic competition for these products. See note 20 of notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 15 of
this  Form 10-K for additional details regarding certain  of these infringement proceedings.

Manufacturing

We currently operate approximately 40 manufacturing plants worldwide. All of our manufacturing facilities

that require certification from the FDA,  Health Canada or foreign agencies have obtained such approval.

We also subcontract the manufacturing of certain of our products, including products manufactured under
the  rights  acquired  from  other  pharmaceutical  companies.  Generally,  acquired  products  continue  to  be
produced for a specific period of time by the selling company. During that time, we integrate the products into
our  own manufacturing facilities or initiate  toll  manufacturing agreements with third  parties.

Products representing slightly less than half of our product sales are produced by third party manufacturers

under toll manufacturing arrangements.

In some cases, the principal raw materials, including active pharmaceutical ingredient, used by us (or our
third party manufacturers) for our various products are purchased in the open market or are otherwise available
from  several  sources.  However,  some  of  the  active  pharmaceutical  ingredient  and  other  raw  materials  are
currently available from a single source and others may in the future become available from only one source. In
addition, in some cases, only a single source of such active pharmaceutical ingredient is identified in filings with
regulatory  agencies,  including  the  FDA,  and  cannot  be  changed  without  prior  regulatory  approval.  Any
disruption in the supply of any such active pharmaceutical ingredient or other raw material or an increase in the
cost  of  such  material  could  adversely  impact  our  ability  to  manufacture  such  products,  the  ability  of  our  third
party  manufacturers  to  supply  us  with  such  products,  or  our  profitability.  We  attempt  to  manage  the  risks
associated with reliance on single sources of active pharmaceutical ingredient or other raw materials by carrying
additional inventories or, where possible, developing  second sources  of supply.

Employees

As  of  December  31,  2014,  we  had  approximately  16,800  employees.  These  employees  included
approximately 8,200 in production, 6,200 in sales and marketing, 1,600 in general and administrative positions
and 800 in the R&D (including regulatory affairs and quality assurance). Collective bargaining exists for some
employees in a number of countries in which we do business. We consider our relations with our employees to be
good  and  have  not  experienced  any  work  stoppages,  slowdowns  or  other  serious  labor  problems  that  have
materially impeded our business operations.

9

Product  Liability Insurance

Effective March 31, 2014, we self-insure substantially all of our product liability risk for claims arising after
that  date.  In  the  future,  we  will  continue  to  reevaluate  our  decision  to  self-insure  and  may  purchase  product
liability insurance to cover some of or  all of  our product liability risk.

Seasonality of Business

Historically, revenues from our business tend to be weighted toward the second half of the year. Sales in the
fourth  quarter  tend  to  be  higher  based  on  consumer  and  customer  purchasing  patterns  associated  with
healthcare  reimbursement  programs.  Further,  the  third  quarter  ‘‘back  to  school’’  period  impacts  demand  for
certain of our dermatology products. However, as we continue our strategy of selective acquisitions to expand
our  product portfolio, there are no assurances  that these  historical trends will continue in  the future.

Geographic Areas

A significant portion of our revenues is generated from operations or otherwise earned outside the U.S. and
Canada. All of our foreign operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business abroad, including price
and  currency  exchange  controls,  fluctuations  in  the  relative  values  of  currencies,  political  and  economic
instability  and  restrictive  governmental  actions  including  possible  nationalization  or  expropriation.  Changes  in
the relative values of currencies may materially affect our results of operations. For a discussion of these risks,
see Item 1A., Risk Factors in this Form  10-K.

See  note  22  of  notes  to  consolidated  financial  statements  in  Item  15  of  this  Form  10-K  for  detailed

information regarding revenues and long-lived assets by  geographic area.

In 2014, a material portion of our revenue and income was earned in Ireland, Luxembourg and Switzerland,

which  have low tax rates. See Item 1A.,  Risk Factors in  this Form 10-K relating  to  tax rates.

Available  Information

Our  Internet  address  is  www.valeant.com.  We  post  links  on  our  website  to  the  following  filings  as  soon  as
reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed or furnished to the SEC: annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly  reports  on  Form  10-Q,  current  reports  on  Form  8-K  and  any  amendment  to  those  reports  filed  or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All such filings
are available through our website free of charge. The information on our Internet website is not incorporated by
reference into this Form 10-K or our other securities filings  and is  not  a  part  of  such filings.

We are also required to file reports and other information with the securities commissions in all provinces in
Canada. You are invited to read and copy any reports, statements or other information, other than confidential
filings, that we file with the provincial securities commissions. These filings are also electronically available from
the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (‘‘SEDAR’’) (http://www.sedar.com), the
Canadian equivalent of the SEC’s electronic document gathering and retrieval system.

Our  filings  may  also  be  read  and  copied  at  the  SEC’s  Public  Reference  Room  at  100  F  Street,  N.E.,
Room  1580,  Washington,  DC  20549.  Information  on  the  operation  of  the  Public  Reference  Room  may  be
obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet website at www.sec.gov that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including us, that
file electronically with the SEC.

10

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our  business,  operations  and  financial  condition  are  subject  to  various  risks  and  uncertainties.  You  should
carefully  consider  the  risks  and  uncertainties  described  below,  together  with  all  of  the  other  information  in  this
Form  10-K,  including  those  risks  set  forth  under  the  heading  entitled  ‘‘Forward-Looking  Statements’’,  and  in  other
documents  that  we  file  with  the  SEC  and  the  CSA,  before  making  any  investment  decision  with  respect  to  our
securities.  If  any  of  the  risks  or  uncertainties  actually  occur  or  develop,  our  business,  financial  condition,  results  of
operations and future growth prospects could change. Under these circumstances, the market value of our securities
could decline, and you could lose all or  part of your investment in  our securities.

Competitive Risks

We  operate  in  extremely  competitive  industries.  If  competitors  develop  or  acquire  more  effective  or  less  costly
pharmaceutical  products  or  medical  devices  for  our  target  indications,  it  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our
business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to decline.

The  pharmaceutical  and  medical  device  industries  are  extremely  competitive.  Our  success  and  future
growth depend, in part, on our ability to acquire, license or develop products that are more effective than those
of  our  competitors  or  that  incorporate  the  latest  technologies  and  our  ability  to  effectively  manufacture  and
market  those  products.  Many  of  our  competitors,  particularly  larger  pharmaceutical  and  medical  device
companies,  have  substantially  greater  financial,  technical  and  human  resources  than  we  do.  Many  of  our
competitors  spend  significantly  more  on  research  and  development  related  activities  than  we  do.  Others  may
succeed in developing or acquiring products that are more effective or less costly than those currently marketed
or  proposed  for  development  by  us.  In  addition,  academic  institutions,  government  agencies  and  other  public
and private organizations conducting research may seek patent protection with respect to potentially competitive
products  and  may  also  establish  exclusive  collaborative  or  licensing  relationships  with  our  competitors.  These
competitors  and  the  introduction  of  competing  products  (that  may  be  more  effective  or  less  costly  than  our
products) could make our products less competitive or obsolete, which could have a material adverse effect on
our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could  cause  the  market  value  of  our  common
stock to decline.

Products representing a significant amount of our revenue are not protected by patent or data exclusivity rights or are
nearing the end of their exclusivity period. In addition, we have faced generic competition in the past and expect to face
additional generic competition in the future. Competitors (including generic competitors) of our products could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of
our common stock to decline.

A significant number of the products we sell have no meaningful exclusivity protection via patent or data
exclusivity  rights  or  are  protected  by  patents  or  regulatory  exclusivity  periods  that  will  be  expiring  in  the  near
future.  These  products  represent  a  significant  amount  of  our  revenues.  Without  exclusivity  protection,
competitors  face  fewer  barriers  in  introducing  competing  products.  Upon  the  expiration  or  loss  of  patent
protection for our products, or upon the ‘‘at-risk’’ launch (despite pending patent infringement litigation against
the  generic  product)  by  a  generic  competitor  of  a  generic  version  of  our  products  (which  may  be  sold  at
significantly lower prices than our products), we could lose a significant portion of sales of that product in a very
short period. The introduction of competing products (including generic products) could have a material adverse
effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could  cause  the  market  value  of  our
common stock to decline.

Acquisition-related Risks

We have grown at a very rapid pace. Our inability to properly manage or support this growth could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock
to decline.

We  have  grown  very  rapidly  over  the  past  few  years  as  a  result  of  our  acquisitions.  This  growth  has  put
significant  demands  on  our  processes,  systems  and  people.  We  have  made  and  expect  to  make  further
investments in additional personnel, systems and internal control processes to help manage our growth. If we are

11

unable to successfully manage and support our rapid growth and the challenges and difficulties associated with
managing a larger, more complex business, this could cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial
position and results of operations, and the  market value of our common stock could decline.

We may  be unable to identify, acquire, close  or integrate acquisition  targets successfully.

Part  of  our  business  strategy  includes  acquiring  and  integrating  complementary  businesses,  products,
technologies or other assets, and forming strategic alliances, joint ventures and other business combinations, to
help  drive  future  growth.  We  may  also  in-license  new  products  or  compounds.  Acquisitions  or  similar
arrangements may be complex, time consuming and expensive. In some cases, we move very rapidly to negotiate
and  consummate  the  transaction,  once  we  identify  the  acquisition  target.  We  may  not  consummate  some
negotiations for acquisitions or other arrangements, which could result in significant diversion of management
and other employee time, as well as substantial out-of-pocket costs. In addition, there are a number of risks and
uncertainties relating to our closing transactions. If such transactions are not completed for any reason, we will
be  subject  to  several  risks,  including  the  following:  (i)  the  market  price  of  our  common  shares  may  reflect  a
market assumption that such transactions will occur, and a failure to complete such transactions could result in a
negative perception by the market of us generally and a decline in the market price of our common shares; and
(ii)  many  costs  relating  to  the  such  transactions  may  be  payable  by  us  whether  or  not  such  transactions  are
completed.

If an acquisition is consummated, the integration of the acquired business, product or other assets into our
Company  may  also  be  complex  and  time-consuming  and,  if  such  businesses,  products  and  assets  are  not
successfully  integrated,  we  may  not  achieve  the  anticipated  benefits,  cost-savings  or  growth  opportunities.
Potential  difficulties  that  may  be  encountered  in  the  integration  process  include  the  following:  integrating
personnel,  operations  and  systems,  while  maintaining  focus  on  selling  and  promoting  existing  and  newly-
acquired products; coordinating geographically dispersed organizations; distracting management and employees
from  operations;  retaining  existing  customers  and  attracting  new  customers;  maintaining  the  business
relationships  the  acquired  company  has  established,  including  with  healthcare  providers;  and  managing
inefficiencies associated with integrating  the operations of the Company.

Furthermore,  we  have  incurred,  and  may  incur  in  the  future,  restructuring  and  integration  costs  and  a
number  of  non-recurring  transaction  costs  associated  with  these  acquisitions,  combining  the  operations  of  the
Company and the acquired company and achieving desired synergies. These fees and costs may be substantial.
Non-recurring  transaction  costs  include,  but  are  not  limited  to,  fees  paid  to  legal,  financial  and  accounting
advisors, filing fees and printing costs. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the integration of the
businesses of the Company and the acquired company. There can be no assurance that the elimination of certain
duplicative  costs,  as  well  as  the  realization  of  other  efficiencies  related  to  the  integration  of  the  acquired
business, will offset the incremental transaction-related costs over time. Therefore, any net benefit may not be
achieved in the near term, the long term or at all.

Finally,  these  acquisitions  and  other  arrangements,  even  if  successfully  integrated,  may  fail  to  further  our
business  strategy  as  anticipated  or  to  achieve  anticipated  benefits  and  success,  expose  us  to  increased
competition  or  challenges  with  respect  to  our  products  or  geographic  markets,  and  expose  us  to  additional
liabilities associated with an acquired business, product, technology or other asset or arrangement. Any one of
these challenges or risks could impair our ability to realize any benefit from our acquisition or arrangement after
we have expended resources on them.

Our proposed transaction with Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (‘‘Salix’’) represents a significant acquisition for
the  Company  and  may  expose  us  to  a  number  of  the  risks  identified  above.  We  cannot  guarantee  that  we  will
satisfy the various conditions to the tender offer and subsequent merger, including with respect to the minimum
number of Salix shares to be tendered in such offer. If we are unable to consummate the proposed acquisition of
Salix,  for  any  reason,  we  may  face  some  or  all  of  the  risks  described  above.  In  addition,  even  if  the  proposed
acquisition is consummated, we may still face difficulties in connection with the integration of the Salix business
into our Company, which integration activities may be complex, time-consuming and disruptive to the operation
of  our  business  generally.  We  have  estimated  that  the  Salix  transaction  will  result  in  significant  synergies.  We
may not achieve all of the anticipated synergies we have identified or we may not achieve these synergies in the

12

anticipated time frame, whether due to difficulties in integration or otherwise. In addition, the costs incurred in
connection  with  such  integration  activities  may  be  more  substantial  than  we  have  anticipated  and,  as  a  result,
may significantly reduce or even outweigh any benefits and efficiencies realized during our integration efforts.
Finally, we may not be successful in implementing all of our plans with respect to the Salix business and, as a
result, we may not be able to achieve all of the anticipated benefits of this proposed transaction. Following the
completion of the acquisition of Salix, we will be subject to the risks associated with Salix’s business, including
those discussed in Salix’s annual and quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any
of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations
or could cause the market value of our  common stock to decline.

Tax-related Risks

Our effective tax rates may increase.

We  have  operations  in  various  countries  that  have  differing  tax  laws  and  rates.  Our  tax  reporting  is
supported by current domestic tax laws in the countries in which we operate and the application of tax treaties
between the various countries in which we operate. Our income tax reporting is subject to audit by domestic and
foreign authorities. Our effective tax rate may change from year to year based on changes in the mix of activities
and  income  earned  among  the  different  jurisdictions  in  which  we  operate;  changes  in  tax  laws  in  these
jurisdictions; changes in the tax treaties between various countries in which we operate; changes in our eligibility
for benefits under those tax treaties; and changes in the estimated values of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Such  changes  could  result  in  a  substantial  increase  in  the  effective  tax  rate  on  all  or  a  portion  of  our  income.

Our provision for income taxes is based on certain estimates and assumptions made by management. Our
consolidated  income  tax  rate  is  affected  by  the  amount  of  net  income  earned  in  our  various  operating
jurisdictions,  the  availability  of  benefits  under  tax  treaties,  and  the  rates  of  taxes  payable  in  respect  of  that
income.  We  enter  into  many  transactions  and  arrangements  in  the  ordinary  course  of  business  in  respect  of
which  the  tax  treatment  is  not  entirely  certain.  We  therefore  make  estimates  and  judgments  based  on  our
knowledge and understanding of applicable tax laws and tax treaties, and the application of those tax laws and
tax treaties to our business, in determining our consolidated tax provision. For example, certain countries could
seek to tax a greater share of income than will be provided for by us. The final outcome of any audits by taxation
authorities may differ from the estimates and assumptions that we may use in determining our consolidated tax
provisions and accruals. This could result in a material adverse effect on our consolidated income tax provision,
financial condition and the net income  for the period in  which such  determinations  are made.

Our deferred tax liabilities, deferred tax assets and any related valuation allowances are affected by events
and  transactions  arising  in  the  ordinary  course  of  business,  acquisitions  of  assets  and  businesses,  and
non-recurring  items.  The  assessment  of  the  appropriate  amount  of  a  valuation  allowance  against  the  deferred
tax assets is dependent upon several factors, including estimates of the realization of deferred income tax assets,
which realization will be primarily based on forecasts of future taxable income. Significant judgment is applied to
determine  the  appropriate  amount  of  valuation  allowance  to  record.  Changes  in  the  amount  of  any  valuation
allowance required could materially increase  or decrease  our provision for income taxes  in a given  period.

Debt-related Risks

We have incurred significant indebtedness, which may restrict the manner in which we conduct business and limit our
ability to implement elements of our growth  strategy.

We have incurred significant indebtedness, including in connection with our acquisitions. We may also incur
additional long-term debt and working capital lines of credit to meet future financing needs, subject to certain
restrictions  under  our  indebtedness,  which  would  increase  our  total  debt.  This  additional  debt  may  be
substantial.  In  particular,  we  will  incur  significant  additional  indebtedness  in  connection  with  our  proposed
acquisition of Salix and, to the extent certain amendments to our Credit Agreement being sought in connection
with  that  transaction  are  not  obtained,  we  may  incur  further  costs.  Our  current  indebtedness  contains  certain
restrictive covenants which impose certain limitations on the way we conduct our business, including limitations
on the amount of additional debt we are able to incur and restrictions on our ability to make certain investments
and  other  restricted  payments.  Any  additional  debt  may  further  restrict  the  manner  in  which  we  conduct

13

business.  Such  restrictions  could  limit  our  ability  to  implement  elements  of  our  growth  strategy.  Some
restrictions could include:

(cid:127) limitations on our ability to obtain additional debt financing on favorable  terms or at all;

(cid:127) instances in which we are unable to meet the financial covenants contained in our debt agreements or to
generate cash sufficient to make required debt payments, which circumstances would have the potential
of resulting in the acceleration of the maturity of some or all of our outstanding indebtedness (which we
may not have the ability to pay);

(cid:127) the allocation of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our debt, thus reducing
the  amount  of  our  cash  flow  available  for  other  purposes,  including  operating  costs  and  capital
expenditures that could improve our  competitive  position and results of operations;

(cid:127) requiring  us  to  issue  debt  or  equity  securities  or  to  sell  some  of  our  core  assets  (subject  to  certain
restrictions  under  our  existing  indebtedness),  possibly  on  unfavorable  terms,  to  meet  payment
obligations;

(cid:127) compromising  our  flexibility  to  plan  for,  or  react  to,  competitive  challenges  in  our  business  and  the

pharmaceutical and medical device industries;

(cid:127) the possibility that we are put at a competitive disadvantage relative to competitors that do not have as
much debt as us, and competitors that may be in a more favorable position to access additional capital
resources; and

(cid:127) limitations on our ability to execute  business development  activities to support  our  strategies.

Our current corporate credit rating is Ba3 for Moody’s Investors Service and BB- for Standard and Poor’s.
A downgrade may increase our cost of borrowing and may negatively impact our ability to raise additional debt
capital.

To service our debt, we will be required to generate a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on a
number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, and any failure to meet our debt service obligations would have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of
our common stock to decline.

We  have  a  significant  amount  of  indebtedness.  Our  ability  to  satisfy  our  debt  obligations  will  depend
principally  upon  our  future  operating  performance.  As  a  result,  prevailing  economic  conditions  and  financial,
business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, may affect our ability to make payments on
our  debt.  If  we  do  not  generate  sufficient  cash  flow  to  satisfy  our  debt  service  obligations,  we  may  have  to
undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling assets, reducing or
delaying  capital  investments  or  seeking  to  raise  additional  capital.  Our  ability  to  restructure  or  refinance  our
debt will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our debt
could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further
restrict  our  business  operations.  Our  inability  to  generate  sufficient  cash  flow  to  satisfy  our  debt  service
obligations  or  to  refinance  our  obligations  on  commercially  reasonable  terms  would  have  a  material  adverse
effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could  cause  the  market  value  of  our
common stock to decline.

Repayment of our indebtedness is dependent on the generation of cash flow by our subsidiaries and their
ability to make such cash available to us, by dividend, debt repayment or otherwise. Our subsidiaries may not be
able  to,  or  may  not  be  permitted  to,  make  distributions  to  enable  us  to  make  payments  in  respect  of  our
indebtedness.  Each  subsidiary  is  a  distinct  legal  entity  and,  under  certain  circumstances,  legal  and  contractual
restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries. Certain non-guarantor subsidiaries include
non-U.S. subsidiaries that may be prohibited by law or other regulations from distributing funds to us and/or we
may  be  subject  to  payment  of  repatriation  taxes  and  withholdings.  In  the  event  that  we  do  not  receive
distributions  from  our  subsidiaries  or  receive  cash  via  cash  repatriation  strategies  for  services  rendered  and
intellectual property, we may be unable to make required principal and interest payments on our indebtedness.

14

We are exposed to risks related to interest  rates.

Our senior secured credit facilities bear interest based on U.S. dollar London Interbank Offering Rates, or
U.S.  Prime  Rate,  or  Federal  Funds  effective  rate.  Thus,  a  change  in  the  short-term  interest  rate  environment
could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could
cause  the  market  value  of  our  common  stock  to  decline.  As  of  December  31,  2014,  we  do  not  have  any
outstanding interest rate swap contracts.

Risks related to the International Scope  of our Business

Our business, financial condition and results of operations are subject to risks arising from the international scope of our
operations.

We conduct a significant portion of our business outside the U.S. and Canada and, in light of our growth
strategy, we anticipate continuing to expand our operations into new countries, including emerging markets. We
sell  our  pharmaceutical  and  medical  device  products  in  many  countries  around  the  world.  All  of  our  foreign
operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business abroad, including,  among  other  things:

(cid:127) difficulties in coordinating and managing foreign operations, including ensuring that foreign operations
comply with foreign laws as well as U.S. laws applicable to U.S. companies with foreign operations, such
as  export  laws  and  the  U.S.  Foreign  Corrupt  Practices  Act,  or  FCPA,  and  other  applicable  worldwide
anti-bribery laws;

(cid:127) price and currency exchange controls;

(cid:127) restrictions on the repatriation of funds;

(cid:127) political and economic instability;

(cid:127) compliance with multiple regulatory regimes;

(cid:127) less established legal and regulatory regimes in certain jurisdictions, including as relates to enforcement

of anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws  and  the reliability of the judicial systems;

(cid:127) differing degrees of protection for intellectual property;

(cid:127) unexpected  changes  in  foreign  regulatory  requirements,  including  quality  standards  and  other

certification requirements;

(cid:127) new export license requirements;

(cid:127) adverse changes in tariff and trade protection measures;

(cid:127) differing labor regulations;

(cid:127) potentially negative consequences from changes in or interpretations of tax laws;

(cid:127) restrictive governmental actions;

(cid:127) possible nationalization or expropriation;

(cid:127) credit market uncertainty;

(cid:127) differing local practices, customs and cultures, some of which may not align or comply with our company

practices or U.S. laws and regulations;

(cid:127) difficulties with licensees, contract counterparties, or  other commercial partners; and

(cid:127) differing local product preferences and product requirements.

Any  of  these  factors,  or  any  other  international  factors,  could  have  a  material  adverse  impact  on  our
business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to
decline.

15

Similarly,  adverse  economic  conditions  impacting  our  customers  in  these  countries  or  uncertainty  about
global economic conditions could cause purchases of our products to decline, which would adversely affect our
revenues  and  operating  results.  Moreover,  our  projected  revenues  and  operating  results  are  based  on
assumptions  concerning  certain  levels  of  customer  spending.  Any  failure  to  attain  our  projected  revenues  and
operating results as a result of adverse economic or market conditions could have a material adverse effect on
our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could  cause  the  market  value  of  our  common
stock to decline.

Due  to  the  large  portion  of  our  business  conducted  in  currency  other  than  U.S.  dollars,  we  have  significant  foreign
currency risk.

We  face  foreign  currency  exposure  on  the  translation  into  U.S.  dollars  of  the  financial  results  of  our
operations in Europe, Canada, Australia, Latin America, Asia and Africa, including, for example, as a result of
the  recent  strengthening  of  the  U.S.  dollar  against  other  foreign  currencies,  including  the  Russian  ruble,  euro
and  yen.  Where  possible,  we  manage  foreign  currency  risk  by  managing  same  currency  revenue  in  relation  to
same  currency  expenses,  as  we  face  foreign  currency  exposure  in  those  countries  where  we  have  revenue
denominated  in  the  local  foreign  currency  and  expenses  denominated  in  other  currencies.  As  a  result,  both
favorable and unfavorable foreign currency impacts to our foreign currency-denominated operating expenses are
mitigated to a certain extent by the natural, opposite impact on our foreign currency-denominated revenue. In
addition,  the  repurchase  of  principal  under  our  U.S.  dollar  denominated  debt  may  result  in  foreign  exchange
gains  or  losses  for  Canadian  income  tax  purposes.  One  half  of  any  foreign  exchange  gains  or  losses  will  be
included in our Canadian taxable income. Any foreign exchange gain will result in a corresponding reduction in
our  available Canadian tax attributes.

Employment-related Risks

We must continue to retain, motivate and recruit executives and other key employees, and failure to do so could have a
material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value
of our common stock to decline.

We must continue to retain and motivate our executives, including our Chief Executive Officer, J. Michael
Pearson,  and  other  key  employees,  and  to  recruit  other  executives  and  employees,  in  order  to  strengthen  our
management  team  and  workforce,  especially  in  light  of  the  growth  of  our  Company.  A  failure  by  us  to  retain,
motivate and recruit executives and other key employees could have a material adverse impact on our business,
financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to decline.

Risks related to Intellectual Property and  Legal Proceedings

The  Company  may  fail  to  obtain,  maintain,  enforce  or  defend  the  intellectual  property  rights  required  to  conduct  its
business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and
could cause the market value of our common stock to decline.

We  strive  to  acquire,  maintain  and  defend  patent,  trademark  and  other  intellectual  property  protections
over our products and the processes used to manufacture these products. However, we may not be successful in
obtaining  such  protections,  or  the  patent,  trademark  and  intellectual  property  rights  we  do  obtain  may  not  be
sufficient in breadth and scope to fully protect our products or prevent competing products, or such patent and
intellectual property rights may be susceptible to third party challenges. The failure to obtain, maintain, enforce
or  defend  such  intellectual  property  rights,  for  any  reason,  could  allow  third  parties  to  manufacture  and  sell
products that compete with our products or may impact our ability to develop, manufacture and market our own
products,  which  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of
operations and could cause the market value of  our common  stock  to  decline.

For  certain  of  our  products  and  manufacturing  processes,  we  rely  on  trade  secrets  and  other  proprietary
information,  which  we  seek  to  protect,  in  part,  by  confidentiality  and  nondisclosure  agreements  with  our
employees,  consultants,  advisors  and  partners.  We  also  attempt  to  enter  into  agreements  whereby  such
employees,  consultants,  advisors  and  partners  assign  to  us  the  rights  in  any  intellectual  property  they  develop.
These  agreements  may  not  effectively  prevent  disclosure  of  such  information  and  disputes  may  still  arise  with

16

respect to the ownership of intellectual property. The disclosure of such proprietary information or the loss of
such intellectual property rights may impact our ability to develop, manufacture and market our own products or
may  assist  competitors  in  the  development,  manufacture  and  sale  of  competing  products,  which  could  have  a
material adverse effect on our revenues, financial condition or results of operations and could cause the market
value of our common stock to decline.

We may also incur substantial costs and resources in applying for and prosecuting these patent, trademark

and other intellectual property rights and  in  defending or litigating these  rights  against third parties.

We are involved in various legal proceedings that are uncertain, costly and time-consuming and could have a material
adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our
common stock to decline.

We  are  involved  in  a  number  of  legal  proceedings  and  may  be  involved  in  litigation  in  the  future.  These
proceedings  are  complex  and  extended  and  occupy  the  resources  of  our  management  and  employees.  These
proceedings are also costly to prosecute and defend and may involve substantial awards or damages payable by
us  if  not  found  in  our  favor.  We  may  also  be  required  to  pay  substantial  amounts  or  grant  certain  rights  on
unfavorable  terms  in  order  to  settle  such  proceedings.  Defending  against  or  settling  such  claims  and  any
unfavorable legal decisions, settlements or orders could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to decline. For more
information regarding legal proceedings, see note 20 of notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 15 of
this  Form 10-K.

In  particular,  the  pharmaceutical  and  medical  device  industries  historically  have  generated  substantial
litigation concerning the manufacture, use and sale of products and we expect this litigation activity to continue.
As a result, we expect that patents related to our products will be routinely challenged, and our patents may not
be upheld. In order to protect or enforce patent rights, we may initiate litigation against third parties. If we are
not successful in defending an attack on our patents and maintaining exclusive rights to market one or more of
our products still under patent protection, we could lose a significant portion of sales in a very short period. We
may also become subject to infringement claims by third parties and may have to defend against charges that we
violated patents or the proprietary rights of third parties. If we infringe the intellectual property rights of others,
we  could  lose  our  right  to  develop,  manufacture  or  sell  products,  including  our  generic  products,  or  could  be
required to pay monetary damages or  royalties to license proprietary  rights from  third parties.

In  addition,  in  the  U.S.,  it  has  become  increasingly  common  for  patent  infringement  actions  to  prompt
claims that antitrust laws have been violated during the prosecution of the patent or during litigation involving
the defense of that patent. Such claims by direct and indirect purchasers and other payers are typically filed as
class actions. The relief sought may include treble damages and restitution claims. Similarly, antitrust claims may
be brought by government entities or private parties following settlement of patent litigation, alleging that such
settlements are anti-competitive and in violation of antitrust laws. In the U.S. and Europe, regulatory authorities
have continued to challenge as anti-competitive so-called ‘‘reverse payment’’ settlements between branded and
generic  drug  manufacturers.  We  may  also  be  subject  to  other  antitrust  litigation  involving  competition  claims
unrelated to patent infringement and prosecution. A successful antitrust claim by a private party or government
entity  against  us  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of
operations and could cause the market value of  our common  stock  to  decline.

If our products cause, or are alleged to cause, serious or widespread personal injury, we may have to withdraw those
products from the market and/or incur significant costs, including payment of substantial sums in damages, and we may
be subject to exposure relating to product liability claims.

We face an inherent business risk of exposure to significant product liability and other claims in the event
that the use of our products caused, or is alleged to have caused, adverse effects. Furthermore, our products may
cause,  or  may  appear  to  have  caused,  adverse  side  effects  (including  death)  or  potentially  dangerous  drug
interactions that we may not learn about or understand fully until the drug has been administered to patients for
some  time.  The  withdrawal  of  a  product  following  complaints  and/or  incurring  significant  costs,  including  the
requirement to pay substantial damages in personal injury cases or product liability cases, could have a material

17

adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of
our  common  stock  to  decline.  In  addition,  effective  March  31,  2014,  we  self-insure  substantially  all  of  our
product  liability risk for claims arising  after  that date.

Development and Regulatory Risks

The successful development of our pipeline products is highly uncertain and requires significant expenditures and time. In
addition, obtaining necessary government approvals is time consuming and not assured. The failure to commercialize
certain  of  our  pipeline  products  could  have  an  adverse  impact  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of
operations and could cause the market  value  of  our common stock  to  decline.

We  currently  have  a  number  of  pipeline  products  in  development.  We  and  our  development  partners,  as
applicable,  conduct  extensive  preclinical  studies  and  clinical  trials  to  demonstrate  the  safety  and  efficacy  in
humans  of  our  pipeline  products  in  order  to  obtain  regulatory  approval  for  the  sale  of  our  pipeline  products.
Preclinical studies and clinical trials are expensive, complex, can take many years and have uncertain outcomes.
Only a small number of our research and development programs may actually result in the commercialization of
a  product.  We  will  not  be  able  to  commercialize  our  pipeline  products  if  preclinical  studies  do  not  produce
successful results or if clinical trials do not demonstrate safety and efficacy in humans. Furthermore, success in
preclinical studies or early-stage clinical trials does not ensure that later stage clinical trials will be successful nor
does it ensure that regulatory approval for the product candidate will be obtained. In addition, the process for
the completion of pre-clinical and clinical trials is lengthy and may be subject to a number of delays for various
reasons, which will delay the commercialization of any successful product. If our development projects are not
successful or are significantly delayed, we may not recover our substantial investments in the pipeline product
and  our  failure  to  bring  these  pipeline  products  to  market  on  a  timely  basis,  or  at  all,  could  have  a  material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of
our  common stock to decline.

In  addition,  FDA  and  Health  Canada  approval  must  be  obtained  in  the  U.S.  and  Canada,  respectively,
EMA approval (drugs) and CE Marking (devices) must be obtained in countries in the EU and similar approvals
must  be  obtained  from  comparable  agencies  in  other  countries,  prior  to  marketing  or  manufacturing  new
pharmaceutical  and  medical  device  products  for  use  by  humans.  Obtaining  such  regulatory  approvals  for  new
products and devices and manufacturing processes can take a number of years and involves the expenditure of
substantial resources. Even if such products appear promising in development stages, regulatory approval may
not be achieved and no assurance can be given that we will obtain approval in those countries where we wish to
commercialize  such  products.  Nor  can  any  assurance  be  given  that  if  such  approval  is  secured,  the  approved
labeling will not have significant labeling limitations, including limitations on the indications for which we can
market a product, or require onerous risk management programs. Furthermore, from time to time, changes to
the applicable legislation or regulations may be introduced that change these review and approval processes for
our products, which changes may make it more difficult and costly to obtain or maintain regulatory approvals.

Our marketed drugs will be subject to ongoing  regulatory review.

Following initial regulatory approval of any products we or our partners may develop or acquire, we will be
subject to continuing regulatory review by various government authorities in those countries where our products
are marketed or intended to be marketed, including the review of adverse drug events and clinical results that
are reported after product candidates become commercially available. If we fail to comply with the regulatory
requirements  in  those  countries  where  our  products  are  sold,  we  could  lose  our  marketing  approvals  or  be
subject  to  fines  or  other  sanctions.  In  addition,  incidents  of  adverse  drug  reactions,  unintended  side  effects  or
misuse relating to our products could result in additional regulatory controls or restrictions, or even lead to the
regulatory authority requiring us to withdraw the product from the market. Further, if faced with these incidents
of adverse drug reactions, unintended side effects or misuse relating to our products, we may elect to voluntarily
implement a recall or market withdrawal of our product. A recall or market withdrawal, whether voluntary or
required by a regulatory authority, may involve significant costs to us, potential disruptions in the supply of our
products  to  our  customers  and  reputational  harm  to  our  products  and  business,  all  of  which  could  harm  our
ability to market our products and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to decline. Also, as a condition to

18

granting marketing approval of a product, the applicable regulatory agencies may require a company to conduct
additional clinical trials, the results of which could result in the subsequent loss of marketing approval, changes
in product labeling or new or increased  concerns about side effects or efficacy of a product.

Our marketing, promotional and pricing practices, as well as the manner in which sales forces interact with purchasers,
prescribers and patients, are subject to extensive regulation and any material failure to comply could result in significant
sanctions against us.

The marketing, promotional, and pricing practices of pharmaceutical and medical device companies, as well
as the manner in which companies’ in-house or third-party sales forces interact with purchasers, prescribers, and
patients, are subject to extensive regulation, enforcement of which may result in the imposition of civil and/or
criminal  penalties,  injunctions,  and/or  limitations  on  marketing  practice  for  our  products.  Many  companies,
including  us,  have  been  the  subject  of  claims  related  to  these  practices  asserted  by  federal  authorities.  These
claims  have  resulted  in  fines  and  other  consequences.  We  are  still  operating  under  a  Corporate  Integrity
Agreement  (‘‘CIA’’)  that  requires  us  to  maintain  a  comprehensive  compliance  program  governing  our  sales,
marketing  and  government  pricing  and  contracting  functions.  Material  failures  to  comply  with  the  CIA  could
result  in  significant  sanctions  against  us,  including  monetary  penalties  and  exclusion  from  federal  health  care
programs. Companies may not promote drugs for ‘‘off-label’’ uses — that is, uses that are not described in the
product’s labeling and that differ from those approved by the FDA, Health Canada, EMA or other applicable
regulatory  agencies.  A  company  that  is  found  to  have  improperly  promoted  off-label  uses  may  be  subject  to
significant  liability,  including  civil  and  administrative  remedies  as  well  as  criminal  sanctions.  In  addition,
management’s attention could be diverted from our business operations and our reputation could be damaged.

For  certain  of  our  products,  we  depend  on  reimbursement  from  third  party  payors  and  a  reduction  in  the  extent  of
reimbursement could reduce our product sales and revenue. In addition, failure to be included in formularies developed by
managed care organizations and other organizations may negatively impact the utilization of our products, which could
harm our market share and could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations and could
cause the market value of our common  stock to decline.

Sales  of  certain  of  our  products  are  dependent,  in  part,  on  the  availability  and  extent  of  reimbursement
from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations of the costs
of our products and our continued participation in such programs. Changes in government regulations or private
third-party payors’ reimbursement policies may reduce reimbursement for our products and adversely affect our
future results.

Managed  care  organizations  and  other  third-party  payors  try  to  negotiate  the  pricing  of  medical  services
and  products  to  control  their  costs.  Managed  care  organizations  and  pharmacy  benefit  managers  typically
develop formularies to reduce their cost for medications. Formularies can be based on the prices and therapeutic
benefits of the available products. Due to their lower costs, generic products are often favored. The breadth of
the  products  covered  by  formularies  varies  considerably  from  one  managed  care  organization  to  another,  and
many  formularies  include  alternative  and  competitive  products  for  treatment  of  particular  medical  conditions.
Failure  to  be  included  in  such  formularies  or  to  achieve  favorable  formulary  status  may  negatively  impact  the
utilization  and  market  share  of  our  products.  If  our  products  are  not  included  within  an  adequate  number  of
formularies  or  adequate  reimbursement  levels  are  not  provided,  or  if  those  policies  increasingly  favor  generic
products, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations
and could cause the market value of  our common  stock  to  decline.

19

Manufacturing and Supply Risks

If  we  or  our  third-party  manufacturers  are  unable  to  manufacture  our  products  or  the  manufacturing  process  is
interrupted due to failure to comply with regulations or for other reasons, the interruption of the manufacture of our
products could adversely affect our business. Other manufacturing and supply difficulties or delays may also adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to
decline.

Our manufacturing facilities and those of our contract manufacturers must be inspected and found to be in
full compliance with current good manufacturing practices (‘‘cGMP’’), quality system management requirements
or similar standards before approval for marketing. While we attempt to build in certain contractual obligations
on  such  third  party  manufacturers,  we  may  not  be  able  to  ensure  that  such  third  parties  comply  with  these
obligations. Our failure or that of our contract manufacturers to comply with cGMP regulations, quality system
management requirements or similar regulations outside of the U.S. could result in enforcement action by the
FDA or its foreign counterparts, including, but not limited to, warning letters, fines, injunctions, civil or criminal
penalties, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production or importation, suspension or
withdrawal  of  regulatory  approval  for  approved  or  in-market  products,  refusal  of  the  government  to  renew
marketing  applications  or  approve  pending  applications  or  supplements,  suspension  of  ongoing  clinical  trials,
imposition  of  new  manufacturing  requirements,  closure  of  facilities  and  criminal  prosecution.  These
enforcement actions could lead to a delay or suspension in production. In addition, our manufacturing and other
processes use complicated and sophisticated equipment, which sometimes requires a significant amount of time
to obtain and install. Manufacturing complexity, testing requirements and safety and security processes combine
to increase the overall difficulty of manufacturing these products and resolving manufacturing problems that we
may  encounter.  Although  we  endeavor  to  properly  maintain  our  equipment  (and  require  our  contract
manufacturers to properly maintain their equipment), including through on-site quality control and experienced
manufacturing supervision, and have key spare parts on hand, our business could suffer if certain manufacturing
or other equipment, or all or a portion of our or their facilities, were to become inoperable for a period of time.
We could experience substantial production delays or inventory shortages in the event of any such occurrence
until  we  or  they  repair  such  equipment  or  facility  or  we  or  they  build  or  locate  replacement  equipment  or  a
replacement facility, as applicable, and seek to obtain necessary regulatory approvals for such replacement. Any
interruption  in  our  manufacture  of  products  could  adversely  affect  the  sales  of  our  current  products  or
introduction of new products and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations and could cause the  market value of our common stock to decline.

The supply of our products to our customers (or, in some case, supply from our contract manufacturers to
us)  is  subject  to  and  dependent  upon  the  use  of  transportation  services.  Disruption  of  transportation  services
(including  as  a  result  of  weather  conditions)  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could  cause  the  market  value  of  our  common  stock  to  decline.  In
addition,  any  prolonged  disruption  in  the  operations  of  our  existing  distribution  facilities,  whether  due  to
technical,  labor  or  other  difficulties,  weather  conditions,  equipment  malfunction,  contamination,  failure  to
follow specific protocols and procedures, destruction of or damage to any facility or other reasons, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market
value of our common stock to decline.

For some of our finished products and raw materials, we obtain supply from one or a limited number of sources. If we are
unable  to  obtain  components  or  raw  materials,  or  products  supplied  by  third  parties,  our  ability  to  manufacture  and
deliver our products to the market would be impeded, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations and  could  cause the  market value of our common stock to decline.

Some components and raw materials used in our manufactured products, and some finished products sold
by us, are currently available only from one or a limited number of domestic or foreign suppliers. In the event an
existing supplier fails to supply product on a timely basis and/or in the requested amount, supplies product that
fails to meet regulatory requirements, becomes unavailable through business interruption or financial insolvency
or loses its regulatory status as an approved source or we are unable to renew current supply agreements when
such  agreements  expire  and  we  do  not  have  a  second  supplier,  we  may  be  unable  to  obtain  the  required
components,  raw  materials  or  products  on  a  timely  basis  or  at  commercially  reasonable  prices.  We  attempt  to

20

mitigate these risks by maintaining safety stock of these products, but such safety stock may not be sufficient. A
prolonged  interruption  in  the  supply  of  a  single-sourced  raw  material,  including  the  active  pharmaceutical
ingredient,  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations
and could cause the market value of  our common  stock  to  decline.

In addition, these third party manufacturers may have the ability to increase the supply price payable by us
for  the  manufacture  and  supply  of  our  products,  in  some  cases  without  our  consent.  Our  dependence  upon
others to manufacture our products may adversely affect our profit margins and our ability to obtain approval
for and produce our products on a timely and competitive basis, which could have a material adverse effect on
our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could  cause  the  market  value  of  our  common
stock to decline.

Commercialization and Distribution Risks

Our approved products may not achieve  or maintain expected  levels of market acceptance.

Even if we are able to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for our pharmaceutical and medical device
products, generic or branded, the success of these products is dependent upon achieving and maintaining market
acceptance.  Commercializing  products  is  time  consuming,  expensive  and  unpredictable.  There  can  be  no
assurance  that  we  will  be  able  to,  either  by  ourselves  or  in  collaboration  with  our  partners  or  through  our
licensees or distributors, successfully commercialize new products or gain market acceptance for such products.
New product candidates that appear promising in development may fail to reach the market or may have only
limited  or  no  commercial  success.  Levels  of  market  acceptance  for  our  new  products  could  be  impacted  by
several factors, some of which are not  within our control,  including but not limited to the:

(cid:127) safety,  efficacy,  convenience  and  cost-effectiveness  of  our  products  compared  to  products  of  our

competitors;

(cid:127) scope of approved uses and marketing approval;

(cid:127) availability of patent or regulatory exclusivity;

(cid:127) timing of market approvals and market entry;

(cid:127) availability of alternative products from our competitors;

(cid:127) acceptance of the price of our products;

(cid:127) effectiveness of our sales forces and  promotional efforts;

(cid:127) the level of reimbursement of our  products;

(cid:127) acceptance of our products on government and private  formularies;

(cid:127) ability to market our products effectively at the retail  level  or  in the appropriate setting of care; and

(cid:127) the reputation of our products.

Further, the market perception and reputation of our products and their safety and efficacy are important
to our business and the continued acceptance of our products. Any negative publicity about our products, such
as the discovery of safety issues with our products, adverse events involving our products, or even public rumors
about such events, may have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, the discovery of significant
problems with a product similar to one of our products that implicate (or are perceived to implicate) an entire
class of products or the withdrawal or recall of such similar products could have an adverse effect on sales of our
products.  Accordingly,  new  data  about  our  products,  or  products  similar  to  our  products,  could  cause  us
reputational harm and could negatively impact demand for our products due to real or perceived side effects or
uncertainty regarding safety or efficacy  and,  in some  cases,  could result in  product withdrawal.

If  our  products  fail  to  gain,  or  lose,  market  acceptance,  our  revenues  would  be  adversely  impacted  which
could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could
cause  the market value of our common stock to decline.

21

Our business may be impacted by seasonality, which may cause our operating results and financial condition to fluctuate.

Demand  for  certain  of  our  products  may  be  impacted  by  seasonality.  Historically,  revenues  from  our
business tend to be weighted toward the second half of the year. Sales in the fourth quarter tend to be higher
based  on  consumer  and  customer  purchasing  patterns  associated  with  healthcare  reimbursement  programs.
Further, the third quarter ‘‘back to school’’ period impacts demand for certain of our dermatology products. This
seasonality  may  cause  our  operating  results  to  fluctuate.  However,  as  we  continue  our  strategy  of  selective
acquisitions to expand our product portfolio, there are no assurances that these historical trends will continue in
the future.

We have entered into distribution agreements with other companies to distribute certain of our products at supply prices
based on net sales. Declines in the pricing and/or volume, over which we have no or limited control, of such products, and
therefore the amounts paid to us, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations and could cause the market  value  of  our common stock  to  decline.

Certain  of  our  products  are  the  subject  of  third  party  distribution  agreements,  pursuant  to  which  we
manufacture  and  sell  products  to  other  companies,  which  distribute  such  products  at  a  supply  price,  typically
based  on  net  sales.  Our  ability  to  control  pricing  and  volume  of  these  products  is  limited  and,  in  some  cases,
these companies make all distribution and pricing decisions independently of us. If the pricing or volume of such
products declines, our revenues would be adversely impacted which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to
decline.

We may experience declines in sales volumes or prices of certain of our products as the result of the concentration of sales
to wholesalers and the continuing trend towards consolidation of such wholesalers and other customer groups and this
could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the
market value of our common stock to decline.

For certain of our products, a significant portion of our sales are to a relatively small number of customers.
If our relationship with one or more of such customers is disrupted or changes adversely or if one or more of
such  customers  experience  financial  difficulty  or  other  material  adverse  change  in  their  businesses,  it  could
materially and adversely affect our sales and financial results, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock to
decline.

In addition, wholesalers and retail drug chains have undergone, and are continuing to undergo, significant
consolidation.  This  consolidation  may  result  in  these  groups  gaining  additional  purchasing  leverage  and
consequently  increasing  the  product  pricing  pressures  facing  our  business.  The  result  of  these  developments
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations and could cause
the market value of our common stock  to  decline.

Risks related to Specific Legislation  and  Regulations

We are subject to various laws and regulations, including ‘‘fraud and abuse’’ laws, anti-bribery laws, environmental laws
and privacy and security regulations, and a failure to comply with such laws and regulations or prevail in any litigation
related  to  noncompliance  could  have  a  material  adverse  impact  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of
operations and could cause the market  value  of  our common stock  to  decline.

Pharmaceutical  and  medical  device  companies  have  faced  lawsuits  and  investigations  pertaining  to
violations of health care ‘‘fraud and abuse’’ laws, such as the federal False Claims Act, the federal Anti-Kickback
Statute  (‘‘AKS’’)  and  other  state  and  federal  laws  and  regulations.  The  AKS  prohibits,  among  other  things,
knowingly  and  willfully  offering,  paying,  soliciting  or  receiving  remuneration  to  induce  or  in  return  for
purchasing,  leasing,  ordering  or  arranging  for  the  purchase,  lease  or  order  of  any  healthcare  item  or  service
reimbursable  under  federally  financed  healthcare  programs.  This  statute  has  been  interpreted  to  apply  to
arrangements  between  pharmaceutical  or  medical  device  manufacturers,  on  the  one  hand,  and  prescribers,
purchasers, formulary managers and other health care related professionals, on the other hand. More generally,
the federal False Claims Act, among other things, prohibits any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to

22

be  presented,  a  false  claim  for  payment  to  the  federal  government.  Pharmaceutical  and  medical  device
companies have been prosecuted or faced civil liability under these laws for a variety of alleged promotional and
marketing  activities,  including  engaging  in  off-label  promotion  that  caused  claims  to  be  submitted  for
non-covered off-label uses.

We  also  face  increasingly  strict  data  privacy  and  security  laws  in  the  U.S.  and  in  other  countries,  the
violation  of  which  could  result  in  fines  and  other  sanctions.  The  United  States  Department  of  Health  and
Human  Services  Office  of  Inspector  General  recommends,  and  increasingly  states  require  pharmaceutical
companies  to  have  comprehensive  compliance  programs.  In  addition,  the  Physician  Payment  Sunshine  Act
enacted  in  2010  imposes  reporting  and  disclosure  requirements  on  device  and  drug  manufacturers  for  any
‘‘transfer  of  value’’  made  or  distributed  to  prescribers  and  other  healthcare  providers.  Failure  to  submit  this
required  information  may  result  in  significant  civil  monetary  penalties.  While  we  have  developed  corporate
compliance programs based on what we believe to be current best practices, we cannot assure you that we or our
employees  or  agents  are  or  will  be  in  compliance  with  all  applicable  federal,  state  or  foreign  regulations  and
laws. If we are in violation of any of these requirements or any such actions are instituted against us, and we are
not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our
business,  including  the  imposition  of  significant  criminal  and  civil  fines  and  penalties,  exclusion  from  federal
healthcare programs or other sanctions.

The  U.S.  Foreign  Corrupt  Practices  Act  (‘‘FCPA’’)  and  similar  worldwide  anti-bribery  laws  generally
prohibit  companies  and  their  intermediaries  from  making  improper  payments  to  officials  for  the  purpose  of
obtaining  or  retaining  business.  Our  policies  mandate  compliance  with  these  anti-bribery  laws.  We  operate  in
many  parts  of  the  world  that  have  experienced  governmental  corruption  and  in  certain  circumstances,  strict
compliance  with  anti-bribery  laws  may  conflict  with  local  customs  and  practices  or  may  require  us  to  interact
with doctors and hospitals, some of which may be state controlled, in a manner that is different than in the U.S.
and Canada. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless
or  criminal  acts  committed  by  our  employees  or  agents.  Violations  of  these  laws,  or  allegations  of  such
violations, could disrupt our business and result in criminal or civil penalties or remedial measures, any of which
could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could
cause  the market value of our common stock to decline.

We are subject to laws and regulations concerning the environment, safety matters, regulation of chemicals
and  product  safety  in  the  countries  where  we  manufacture  and  sell  our  products  or  otherwise  operate  our
business. These requirements include regulation of the handling, manufacture, transportation, use and disposal
of materials, including the discharge of pollutants into the environment. In the normal course of our business,
hazardous  substances  may  be  released  into  the  environment,  which  could  cause  environmental  or  property
damage or personal injuries, and which could subject us to remediation obligations regarding contaminated soil
and groundwater or potential liability for damage claims. Under certain laws, we may be required to remediate
contamination  at  certain  of  our  properties  regardless  of  whether  the  contamination  was  caused  by  us  or  by
previous occupants of the property or by others. In recent years, the operations of all companies have become
subject  to  increasingly  stringent  legislation  and  regulation  related  to  occupational  safety  and  health,  product
registration  and  environmental  protection.  Such  legislation  and  regulations  are  complex  and  constantly
changing, and future changes in laws or regulations may require us to install additional controls for certain of
our emission sources, to undertake changes in our manufacturing processes or to remediate soil or groundwater
contamination at facilities where such  cleanup is not currently required.

We  are  also  subject  to  various  privacy  and  security  regulations,  including  but  not  limited  to  the  Health
Insurance  Portability  and  Accountability  Act  of  1996,  as  amended  by  the  Health  Information  Technology  for
Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (as amended, ‘‘HIPAA’’). HIPAA mandates, among other things, the
adoption of uniform standards for the electronic exchange of information in common health care transactions
(e.g.,  health  care  claims  information  and  plan  eligibility,  referral  certification  and  authorization,  claims  status,
plan enrollment, coordination of benefits and related information), as well as standards relating to the privacy
and  security  of  individually  identifiable  health  information,  which  require  the  adoption  of  administrative,
physical and technical safeguards to protect such information. In addition, many states have enacted comparable
laws addressing the privacy and security of health information, some of which are more stringent than HIPAA.
Failure to comply with these laws can result in the imposition of significant civil and criminal penalties. The costs

23

of  compliance  with  these  laws  and  the  potential  liability  associated  with  the  failure  to  comply  with  these  laws
could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  and  could
cause  the market value of our common stock to decline.

Legislative or regulatory reform of the healthcare system may affect our ability to sell our products profitably and could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market
value of our common stock to decline.

In  the  U.S.  and  certain  foreign  jurisdictions,  there  have  been  a  number  of  legislative  and  regulatory
proposals to change the healthcare system in ways that could impact our ability to sell our products profitably.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation
Act  of  2010  (the  ‘‘Health  Care  Reform  Act’’)  may  affect  the  operational  results  of  companies  in  the
pharmaceutical and medical device industries, including the Company and other healthcare related industries,
by  imposing  on  them  additional  costs.  Effective  January  1,  2010,  the  Health  Care  Reform  Act  increased  the
minimum Medicaid drug rebates for pharmaceutical companies, expanded the 340B drug discount program, and
made changes to affect the Medicare Part D coverage gap, or ‘‘donut hole’’. The law also revised the definition
of  ‘‘average  manufacturer  price’’  for  reporting  purposes,  which  may  affect  the  amount  of  our  Medicaid  drug
rebates to states. Beginning in 2011, the law imposed a significant annual fee on companies that manufacture or
import branded prescription drug products. Finally, the law imposed an annual tax on manufacturers of certain
medical devices.

The Health Care Reform Act and further changes to health care laws or regulatory framework that reduce
our revenues or increase our costs could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations and could cause  the market value of our common stock to decline.

Other Risks

Our operating results and financial condition may fluctuate.

Our  operating  results  and  financial  condition  may  fluctuate  from  quarter  to  quarter  for  a  number  of
reasons.  The  following  events  or  occurrences,  among  others,  could  cause  fluctuations  in  our  financial
performance from period to period:

(cid:127) development and launch of new competitive products;

(cid:127) the timing and receipt of FDA approvals or lack of  approvals;

(cid:127) costs related to business development  transactions;

(cid:127) changes in the amount we spend to  promote  our  products;

(cid:127) delays between our expenditures to acquire new products, technologies or businesses and the generation

of revenues from those acquired products, technologies  or businesses;

(cid:127) changes in treatment practices of physicians that currently prescribe certain of our products;

(cid:127) increases in the cost of raw materials  used  to  manufacture our products;

(cid:127) manufacturing and supply interruptions;

(cid:127) our responses to price competition;

(cid:127) expenditures as a result of legal actions (and settlements thereof), including the defense of our patents

and other intellectual property;

(cid:127) market acceptance of our products;

(cid:127) the timing of wholesaler and distributor purchases;

(cid:127) general  economic  and  industry  conditions,  including  potential  fluctuations  in  foreign  currency  and

interest rates;

(cid:127) changes in seasonality of demand for certain  of our products;  and

24

(cid:127) foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

As a result, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of results from operations, or any other similar
period-to-period comparisons, should not be construed as reliable indicators of our future performance. In any
quarterly period, our results may be below the expectations of market analysts and investors, which could cause
the market value of our common stock  to  decline.

We have significant goodwill and other intangible assets and potential impairment of goodwill and other intangibles may
significantly impact our profitability.

Goodwill  and  intangible  assets  represent  a  significant  portion  of  our  total  assets.  Finite-lived  intangible
assets are subject to an impairment analysis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
amount  of  the  asset  may  not  be  recoverable.  Goodwill  and  indefinite-lived  intangible  assets  are  tested  for
impairment  annually,  or  more  frequently  if  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  indicate  that  the  asset  may  be
impaired.  If  an  impairment  exists,  we  would  be  required  to  take  an  impairment  charge  with  respect  to  the
impaired  asset.  Events  giving  rise  to  impairment  are  difficult  to  predict  and  are  an  inherent  risk  in  the
pharmaceutical and medical device industries. As a result of the significance of goodwill and intangible assets,
our financial condition and results of operations in a future period could be negatively impacted should such an
impairment of goodwill or intangible assets occur, which could cause the market value of our common stock to
decline.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We  own  and  lease  a  number  of  important  properties.  Our  headquarters  and  one  of  our  manufacturing
facilities are located in Laval, Quebec. We have several manufacturing facilities throughout the United States.
We also own or have an interest in manufacturing plants or other properties outside the United States, including
Canada, Mexico, and certain countries  in  Europe and  Asia.

We consider our facilities to be in satisfactory condition and suitable for their intended use, although some
limited  investments  to  improve  our  manufacturing  and  other  related  facilities  are  contemplated,  based  on  the
needs  and  requirements  of  our  business.  Our  administrative,  marketing,  research/laboratory,  distribution  and
warehousing  facilities  are  located  in  various  parts  of  the  world.  We  co-locate  our  R&D  activities  with  our
manufacturing  at  the  plant  level  in  a  number  of  facilities.  Our  scientists,  engineers,  quality  control  and
manufacturing  technicians  work  side-by-side  in  designing  and  manufacturing  products  that  fit  the  needs  and
requirements of our customers, regulators  and  business units.

25

We  believe  that we have sufficient facilities to conduct our operations during 2015. Our facilities include,

among others, the following list of principal properties  by  segment:

Location

Purpose

Owned
or
Leased

Approximate
Square
Footage

Laval, Quebec, Canada . . . . . . . . Corporate headquarters, manufacturing and

Owned

337,000

Bridgewater, New Jersey . . . . . . . Administration

Leased

310,000

warehouse facility

Developed Markets
Rochester, New York . . . . . . . . . . Office,  R&D and manufacturing facility
Waterford, Ireland . . . . . . . . . . . . R&D and manufacturing facility
Greenville, South Carolina . . . . . . Distribution facility
Greenville, South Carolina . . . . . . Manufacturing and distribution facility
Tampa, Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R&D and manufacturing facility
Berlin, Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing, distribution and office facility
Steinbach, Manitoba, Canada . . . . Offices, manufacturing and warehouse facility
Chattanooga, Tennessee . . . . . . . . Distribution facility

Emerging Markets
Jinan,  China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office and manufacturing facility
Mexico City, Mexico . . . . . . . . . . Offices and manufacturing facility
San Juan del Rio, Mexico . . . . . . Offices and manufacturing facility
Indaiatuba, Brazil
Jelenia Gora, Poland . . . . . . . . . . Offices, R&D and manufacturing and

. . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing facility

warehouse facility

Rzeszow, Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . Offices, R&D and manufacturing facility
Belgrade, Serbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . Offices and manufacturing facility
Long An, Vietnam . . . . . . . . . . . Offices, manufacturing and warehouse facility
Cianjur, Indonesia . . . . . . . . . . . . Offices, manufacturing and warehouse facility

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased

Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned

Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned

953,000
379,000
320,000
225,000
171,000
339,000
250,000
150,000

416,000
161,000
816,000
165,000
546,000

412,000
161,000
323,000
343,000

See  note  20  of  notes  to  consolidated  financial  statements  in  Item  15  of  this  Form  10-K,  which  is

incorporated by reference herein.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

26

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,  Related  Stockholder Matters  and Issuer Purchases of

PART II

Equity Securities

Market Information

Our  common  shares  are  traded  on  the  New  York  Stock  Exchange  (‘‘NYSE’’)  and  on  the  Toronto  Stock
Exchange  (‘‘TSX’’)  under  the  symbol  ‘‘VRX’’.  The  following  table  sets  forth  the  high  and  low  per  share  sales
prices for our common shares on the NYSE  and TSX for the periods indicated.

NYSE

TSX

High
$

Low
$

High
C$

Low
C$

2014
First  quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2013
First  quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

153.10
139.00
131.87
149.90

75.10
96.25
106.98
118.25

112.26
115.14
106.00
111.41

59.34
69.87
86.89
102.60

170.45
152.52
147.23
174.08

76.58
99.49
109.93
125.71

119.66
126.02
116.01
125.50

58.53
70.99
92.41
107.30

Source: NYSEnet, TSX Historical Data Access

Market Price Volatility of Common Shares

Market prices for the securities of pharmaceutical, medical devices and biotechnology companies, including
our  securities,  have  historically  been  highly  volatile,  and  the  market  has  from  time  to  time  experienced
significant  price  and  volume  fluctuations  that  are  unrelated  to  the  operating  performance  of  particular
companies. Factors such as fluctuations in our operating results, the aftermath of public announcements by us,
concern as to safety of drugs and medical devices and general market conditions can have an adverse effect on
the market price of our common shares and other securities.

Holders

The approximate number of holders of  record of our common shares as  of  February 18, 2015 is 3,328.

Performance Graph

The  following  graph  compares  the  cumulative  total  return  on  our  common  shares  with  the  cumulative
return on the S&P 500 Index, the TSX/S&P Composite Index and a 13-stock Custom Composite Index for the
five years ended December 31, 2014, in all cases, assuming reinvestment of dividends. The Custom Composite
Index consists of Actavis Inc.; Allergan Inc.; Amgen Inc.; Biogen Idec Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb & Co.; Celgene
Corporation; Danaher Corporation; Gilead Sciences Inc.; Lilly (Eli) & Co.; Shire plc; Mylan Inc.; Perrigo Co.
and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

27

$1,200

$1,000

$800

$600

$400

$200

$0

Dec-09

S&P 500 Index
S&P/TSX Composite Index
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.
Custom Composite Index

Dec-10

Dec-11

Dec-12

Dec-13

26FEB201506502653
Dec-14

Dec-09

Dec-10

Dec-11

Dec-12

Dec-13

Dec-14

S&P 500 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P/TSX Composite Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Custom Composite Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100
100
100
100

115
118
214
113

117
107
353
143

136
115
452
172

180
130
888
282

205
144
1,083
377

Dividends

No dividends were declared or paid in  2014, 2013 or 2012.

While our Board of Directors will review our dividend policy from time to time, we currently do not intend
to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the covenants contained in the Third Amended
and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, as amended and our bond indentures include restrictions on the
payment of dividends.

Restrictions on Share Ownership by  Non-Canadians

There  are  no  limitations  under  the  laws  of  Canada  or  in  our  organizational  documents  on  the  right  of
foreigners  to  hold  or  vote  securities  of  our  Company,  except  that  the  Investment  Canada  Act  (Canada)  (the
‘‘Investment  Canada  Act’’)  may  require  review  and  approval  by  the  Minister  of  Industry  (Canada)  of  certain
acquisitions of ‘‘control’’ of our Company  by  a ‘‘non-Canadian’’.

Investment Canada Act

An  acquisition  of  control  of  a  Canadian  business  by  a  non-Canadian  is  either  reviewable  (a  ‘‘Reviewable
Transaction’’), in which case it is subject to both a reporting obligation and an approval process, or notifiable, in
which case it is subject to only a reporting obligation. In the case of a Reviewable Transaction, the non-Canadian
acquirer must submit an application for review with the prescribed information. The responsible Minister is then
required to determine whether the Reviewable Transaction is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, taking into
account the assessment factors specified in the Investment Canada Act and any written undertakings that may
have been given by the non-Canadian  acquirer.

Any investment by a non-Canadian in a Canadian business, even where control has not been acquired, can
be reviewed on grounds of whether it may be injurious to national security. Where an investment is determined
to  be  injurious  to  national  security,  Cabinet  can  prohibit  closing  or,  if  closed,  can  order  the  investor  to  divest
control. Short of a prohibition or divestment order, Cabinet can impose terms or conditions on the investment or
can require the investor to provide binding  undertakings  to remove the national security concern.

28

Competition Act

Part IX of the Competition Act (Canada) (the ‘‘Competition Act’’) requires that a pre-merger notification
filing be submitted to the Commissioner of Competition (the ‘‘Commissioner’’) in respect of certain classes of
merger transactions that exceed certain prescribed thresholds. If a proposed transaction exceeds such thresholds,
subject  to  certain  exceptions,  the  notification  filing  must  be  submitted  to  the  Commissioner  and  the  statutory
waiting period must expire or be terminated early or waived by the Commissioner before the transaction can be
completed.

All  mergers,  regardless  of  whether  they  are  subject  to  Part  IX  of  the  Competition  Act,  are  subject  to  the
substantive mergers provisions under Section 92 of the Competition Act. In particular, the Commissioner may
challenge a transaction before the Competition Tribunal where the transaction prevents or lessens, or is likely to
prevent or lessen, competition substantially in a market. The Commissioner may not make an application to the
Competition Tribunal under Section 92 of the Competition Act more than one year after the merger has been
substantially completed.

Exchange Controls

Canada  has  no  system  of  exchange  controls.  There  are  no  Canadian  restrictions  on  the  repatriation  of
capital  or  earnings  of  a  Canadian  public  company  to  non-resident  investors.  There  are  no  laws  in  Canada  or
exchange  restrictions  affecting  the  remittance  of  dividends,  profits,  interest,  royalties  and  other  payments  to
non-resident holders of our securities, except as  discussed in ‘‘Taxation’’ below.

Taxation

Canadian Federal Income Taxation

The  following  discussion  is  a  summary  of  the  principal  Canadian  federal  income  tax  considerations
generally applicable to a holder of our common shares who, at all relevant times, for purposes of the Income Tax
Act (Canada) and the Income Tax Regulations (collectively, the ‘‘Canadian Tax Act’’) deals at arm’s-length with,
and is not affiliated with, our Company, beneficially owns its common shares as capital property, does not use or
hold and is not deemed to use or hold such common shares in carrying on a business in Canada, does not with
respect to common shares enter into a ‘‘derivative forward agreement’’ as defined in the Income Tax Act, and
who, at all relevant times, for purposes of the application of the Canadian Tax Act and the Canada-U.S. Income
Tax Convention (1980, as amended) (the ‘‘U.S. Treaty’’), is resident in the U.S., is not, and is not deemed to be,
resident in Canada and is eligible for benefits under the U.S. Treaty (a ‘‘U.S. Holder’’). Special rules, which are
not discussed in the summary, may apply to a non-resident holder that is an insurer that carries on an insurance
business in Canada and elsewhere or that is an ‘‘authorized foreign bank’’ as defined in the Canadian Tax Act.

The  U.S.  Treaty  includes  limitation  on  benefits  rules  that  restrict  the  ability  of  certain  persons  who  are
resident in the U.S. to claim any or all benefits under the U.S. Treaty. Furthermore, limited liability companies
(‘‘LLCs’’)  that  are  not  taxed  as  corporations  pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  the  U.S.  Internal  Revenue  Code  of
1986, as amended (the ‘‘Code’’) do not generally qualify as resident in the U.S. for purposes of the U.S. Treaty.
Under  the  U.S.  Treaty,  a  resident  of  the  U.S.  who  is  a  member  of  such  an  LLC  and  is  otherwise  eligible  for
benefits  under  the  U.S.  Treaty  may  generally  be  entitled  to  claim  benefits  under  the  U.S.  Treaty  in  respect  of
income, profits or gains derived through the LLC. Residents of the U.S. should consult their own tax advisors
with respect to their eligibility for benefits  under the U.S. Treaty, having regard to these rules.

This summary is based upon the current provisions of the U.S. Treaty and the Canadian Tax Act and our
understanding  of  the  current  administrative  policies  and  assessing  practices  of  the  Canada  Revenue  Agency
published in writing prior to the date hereof. This summary takes into account all specific proposals to amend
the  U.S.  Treaty  and  the  Canadian  Tax  Act  publicly  announced  by  or  on  behalf  of  the  Minister  of  Finance
(Canada) prior to the date hereof. This summary does not otherwise take into account or anticipate changes in
law  or  administrative  policies  and  assessing  practices,  whether  by  judicial,  regulatory,  administrative  or
legislative  decision  or  action,  nor  does  it  take  into  account  provincial,  territorial  or  foreign  tax  legislation  or
considerations, which may differ from those  discussed herein.

29

This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or
tax advice generally or to any particular holder. Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to
their own particular circumstances.

Gains on Disposition of Common Shares

In general, a U.S. Holder will not be subject to tax under the Canadian Tax Act on capital gains arising on
the disposition of such holder’s common shares unless the common shares are ‘‘taxable Canadian property’’ to
the U.S.  Holder and are not ‘‘treaty-protected  property’’.

As long as the common shares are then listed on a ‘‘designated stock exchange’’, which currently includes
the  NYSE  and  TSX,  the  common  shares  generally  will  not  constitute  taxable  Canadian  property  of  a  U.S.
Holder, unless (a) at any time during the 60-month period preceding the disposition, the U.S. Holder, persons
not dealing at arm’s length with such U.S. Holder or the U.S. Holder together with all such persons, owned 25%
or more of the issued shares of any class or series of the capital stock of the Company and more than 50% of the
fair market value of the common shares was derived, directly or indirectly, from any combination of (i) real or
immoveable property situated in Canada, (ii) ‘‘Canadian resource property’’ (as such term is defined in the Tax
Act), (iii) ‘‘timber resource property’’ (as such terms are defined in the Tax Act), or (iv) options in respect of, or
interests in, or for civil law rights in, any such properties whether or not the property exists, or (b) the common
shares are otherwise deemed to be taxable Canadian property.

Common shares will be treaty-protected property where the U.S. Holder is exempt from income tax under
the Canadian Tax Act on the disposition of common shares because of the U.S. Treaty. Common shares owned
by  a  U.S.  Holder  will  generally  be  treaty-protected  property  where  the  value  of  the  common  shares  is  not
derived principally from real property situated in Canada, as defined  in the  U.S. Treaty.

Dividends on Common Shares

Dividends paid or credited on the common shares or deemed to be paid or credited on the common shares
to  a  U.S.  Holder  that  is  the  beneficial  owner  of  such  dividends  will  generally  be  subject  to  non-resident
withholding tax under the Canadian Tax Act and the U.S. Treaty at the rate of (a) 5% of the amounts paid or
credited if the U.S. Holder is a company that owns (or is deemed to own) at least 10% of our voting stock, or
(b) 15% of the amounts paid or credited in all other cases. The rate of withholding under the Canadian Tax Act
in respect of dividends paid to non-residents  of Canada is  25%  where no tax treaty applies.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity  Compensation Plans

Information required under this Item will be included in our definitive proxy statement for the 2015 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders expected to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year
covered by this Form 10-K (the ‘‘2015 Proxy Statement’’), and such required information is incorporated herein
by reference.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the  Company  and Affiliated Purchases

Set forth below is the information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of

the year ended December 31, 2014:

Period

Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased(1)(2)

Average Price
Paid Per Share(3)

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of  Publicly
Announced Plan

Maximum Number
(Approximate Dollar Value)
of Shares  That
May  Yet Be  Purchased
Under the Plan(1)
(In millions)

October 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014 . . . . . .
November  1, 2014 to November 30, 2014 . . .
December 1,  2014 to December 31, 2014 . . .

—
—
175

$ —
$ —
$143.39

—
—
—

$1,500
$2,000
$2,000

(1) On  November  21,  2013,  our  Board  of  Directors  authorized  the  repurchase  of  up  to  $1.5  billion  of  convertible  notes,  senior  notes,
common  shares  and/or  other  future  debt  or  shares,  subject  to  any  restrictions  in  our  financing  agreements  and  applicable  law  (the

30

‘‘2013  Securities  Repurchase  Program’’).  The  2013  Securities  Repurchase  Program  terminated  on  November  21,  2014.  On
November  20,  2014,  our  Board  of  Directors  authorized  the  repurchase  of  up  to  $2.0  billion  of  senior  notes,  common  shares  and/or
other  securities,  subject  to  any  restrictions  in  our  financing  agreements  and  applicable  law  (the  ‘‘2014  Securities  Repurchase
Program’’).  The  2014  Securities  Repurchase  Program  will  terminate  on  November  20,  2015  or  at  such  time  as  we  complete  our
purchases. During the three-month period ended December 31, 2014, we did not make any repurchases of our senior notes or common
shares  under  the  2013  Securities  Repurchase  Program  or  the  2014  Securities  Repurchase  Program.  For  more  information  regarding
our repurchase programs, see note 14 of notes to consolidated financial  statements in Item 15 of this Form 10-K.

(2)

Includes 175 shares purchased (subsequently cancelled) under the employee stock purchase program. Such purchases were not made
under the 2014 Securities Repurchase Program.

(3) The average price paid per share excludes any broker commissions.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table of selected consolidated financial data of our Company has been derived from financial
statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (‘‘GAAP’’). The data is
qualified  by  reference  to,  and  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
related notes thereto prepared in accordance  with U.S. GAAP (see Item  15 of this Form 10-K) as well as the
discussion  in  Item  7.  ‘‘Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of
Operations’’. All dollar amounts are expressed in  millions  of  U.S.  dollars, except  per  share data.

Consolidated operating data:
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to Valeant

Years Ended December 31,

2014

2013(1)

2012

2011

2010

$8,263.5
2,039.7

$5,769.6
(409.5)

$3,480.4
79.7

$2,427.5
300.0

$1,181.2
(110.1)

Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

913.5

(866.1)

(116.0)

159.6

(208.2)

Earnings (loss) per share attributable  to  Valeant

Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends declared per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.72
2.67

$
$
$ —

$ (2.70) $ (0.38) $
$ (2.70) $ (0.38) $
$ —

$ —

$ —

0.52
0.49

$ (1.06)
$ (1.06)
1.28
$

Consolidated balance sheet:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

2014

2013(1)

2012

2011

2010

At December 31,

$

322.6
1,462.3
26,353.0
15,254.6
8,349.2

$

600.3
1,373.4
27,970.8
17,367.7
8,301.2

$

916.1
954.7
17,950.4
11,015.6
5,940.7

$

164.1
433.2
13,108.1
6,651.0
5,963.6

$

394.3
327.7
10,795.1
3,595.3
5,251.7

shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,312.2

5,118.7

3,717.4

3,929.8

4,911.1

Number of common shares issued and

outstanding (in millions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

334.4

333.0

303.9

306.4

302.4

(1)

In 2013, we recognized an impairment charge of $551.6 million related to ezogabine/retigabine (immediate-release formulation), and
we  wrote  off  an  IPR&D  asset  of  $93.8  million  relating  to  a  modified-release  formulation  of  ezogabine/retigabine.  For  more
information  regarding  these  impairment  charges  and  other  impairment  charges,  see  note  6  and  note  10  of  notes  to  consolidated
financial statements in Item 15 of this Form 10-K.

The amounts presented in the tables above also include the impact of several acquisitions and divestitures
of businesses. For more information regarding our acquisitions and divestitures, see note 3 and note 4 of notes
to consolidated financial statements in  Item 15  of this  Form 10-K.

31

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INTRODUCTION

The  following  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of  Operations
(‘‘MD&A’’) should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto,
prepared in accordance with United States (‘‘U.S.’’) generally accepted accounting principles (‘‘GAAP’’) as of
December  31,  2014  and  2013  and  each  of  the  three  years  in  the  period  ended  December  31,  2014  (the  ‘‘2014
Financial Statements’’).

Additional information relating to the Company, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2014 (the ‘‘2014 Form 10-K’’), is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’)  website at www.sec.gov.

Unless otherwise indicated herein, the discussion and analysis contained in this MD&A is as of February 25,

2015.

All dollar amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars, unless  otherwise noted.

OVERVIEW

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  (‘‘we’’,  ‘‘us’’,  ‘‘our’’  or  the  ‘‘Company’’)  is  a  multinational,
specialty pharmaceutical and medical device company that develops, manufactures, and markets a broad range
of  branded,  generic  and  branded  generic  pharmaceuticals,  over-the-counter  (‘‘OTC’’)  products,  and  medical
devices  (contact  lenses,  intraocular  lenses,  ophthalmic  surgical  equipment,  and  aesthetics  devices),  which  are
marketed directly or indirectly in over 100 countries. In the Developed Markets segment, we focus most of our
efforts in the eye health, dermatology and neurology therapeutic classes. In the Emerging Markets segment, we
focus primarily on branded generics, OTC products, and medical devices. We are diverse not only in our sources
of  revenue  from  our  broad  drug  and  medical  device  portfolio,  but  also  among  the  therapeutic  classes  and
geographies we serve.

On  August  5,  2013,  we  acquired  Bausch  &  Lomb  Holdings  Incorporated  (‘‘B&L’’),  pursuant  to  an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the ‘‘Merger Agreement’’) dated May 24, 2013 (the ‘‘B&L Acquisition’’). B&L
is  a  global  eye  health  company  that  focuses  primarily  on  the  development,  manufacture  and  marketing  of  eye
health  products,  including  contact  lenses,  contact  lens  care  solutions,  ophthalmic  pharmaceuticals  and
ophthalmic  surgical  products.  We  believe  we  will  continue  to  grow  the  B&L  business  due  primarily  to  the
expected  growth  of  the  overall  eye  health  market  and  the  introduction  of  new  products.  Further,  we  have
substantially  integrated  the  B&L  business  into  our  decentralized  structure  which  has  allowed  us  to  realize
operational efficiencies and cost synergies. For more information regarding the B&L Acquisition, see note 3 of
notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 15 of  this  Form 10-K.

Our  strategy  is  to  focus  our  business  on  core  geographies  and  therapeutic  classes  that  offer  attractive
growth  opportunities  while  maintaining  our  lower  selling,  general  and  administrative  cost  model  and
decentralized operating structure. We have an established portfolio of durable products with a focus in the eye
health and dermatology therapeutic areas. Further, we have completed numerous transactions over the past few
years  to  expand  our  portfolio  offering  and  geographic  footprint,  including,  among  others,  the  acquisitions  of
B&L  and  Medicis  Pharmaceutical  Corporation  (‘‘Medicis’’),  and  we  will  continue  to  pursue  value-added
business development opportunities as they arise. The growth of our business is further augmented through our
lower  risk,  output-focused  research  and  development  model,  which  allows  us  to  advance  certain  development
programs  to  drive  future  commercial  growth,  while  minimizing  our  research  and  development  expense.  We
believe  this  strategy  will  allow  us  to  maximize  both  the  growth  rate  and  profitability  of  the  Company  and  to
enhance shareholder value.

We measure our success through total shareholder return and, on that basis, as of February 18, 2015, the
market price of our common shares on the New York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) has increased approximately
550%,  and  the  market  price  of  our  common  shares  on  the  Toronto  Stock  Exchange  (‘‘TSX’’)  has  increased
approximately 670%, since the Company’s (then named Biovail Corporation (‘‘Biovail’’)) acquisition of Valeant

32

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Pharmaceuticals  International  (‘‘Valeant’’)  on  September  28,  2010  (the  ‘‘Merger’’),  as  adjusted  for  the
post-Merger special dividend of $1.00  per  common share (the ‘‘post-Merger  special dividend’’).

ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

We  have  completed  several  transactions  in  2014,  2013,  and  2012,  including,  among  others,  the  following

acquisitions and divestitures.

Acquisitions of businesses and product rights

2014

Acquisition
Date

PreCision Dermatology, Inc. (‘‘PreCision’’)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Solta  Medical, Inc. (‘‘Solta Medical’’) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

July 2014
January 2014

2013

B&L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 2013
Obagi Medical Products, Inc. (‘‘Obagi’’) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April 2013
Natur  Produkt International, JSC (‘‘Natur Produkt’’) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

February  2013

2012

Medicis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December  2012
OraPharma Topco Holdings, Inc. (‘‘OraPharma’’) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certain  assets of Gerot Lannach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2012

June 2012

Divestitures

2014

Divestiture
Date

Facial aesthetic fillers and toxins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Metronidazole 1.3% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tretin-X(cid:4)  (tretinoin) cream and generic tretinoin gel and cream products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

July 2014
July 2014
July 2014

2013

Divestiture of  certain skincare products sold in Australia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October  2013

2012

Divestitures of 1% clindamycin and 5% benzoyl peroxide gel (‘‘IDP-111’’) and 5% fluorouracil cream (‘‘5-FU’’) . . .

February 2012

For  more  information  regarding  our  acquisitions  and  divestitures,  see  note  3  and  note  4  of  notes  to

consolidated financial statements in Item 15  of this  Form 10-K.

PRODUCTS IN DEVELOPMENT

The following products, among others, are currently in  development:
(cid:127) Envista(cid:4)  Toric  is  a  one-piece  hydrophobic  acrylic  toric  intraocular  lens  (IOL).  The  lens  is  designed  to
minimize Posterior Capsular Opacification (PCO), a common post-surgical complication with IOLs that
causes vision to become clouded post-surgery.  The clinical study is  ongoing.

(cid:127) Brimonidine  tartrate  0.025%  is  being  developed  as  an  ocular  redness  reliever.  Phase  2  studies  have
demonstrated fast onset and long-lasting efficacy, with low potential for rebound redness. The product is
in Phase 3.

(cid:127) Vesneo(cid:5)  (latanoprostene  bunod),  a  nitric-oxide  donating  prostaglandin,  is  being  developed  for  the
reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In September
2014,  we  announced  positive  top-line  results  from  the  pivotal  Phase  3  studies.  These  studies  met  their
primary endpoint and showed positive results  on a  number of secondary  endpoints.

33

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(cid:127) Lotemax(cid:4)  Gel  Next  Generation  (loteprednol  etabonate  0.38%),  an  ophthalmic  steroid,  is  being
developed  for  the  reduction  of  inflammation  and  pain  following  cataract  surgery.  The  product  is  in
Phase 3.

(cid:127) Ultra  Plus  Toric  and  Multi-Focal  contact  lenses  (Ultra  Plus  Powers)  are  made  with  a  novel  silicone
hydrogel which allows more oxygen to the eyes for ocular health. These contact lenses contain a higher
water content and have less dehydration as compared to our other lenses. We are expanding the power
range of these contact lenses to provide these new lenses to more patients.

(cid:127) Biotrue(cid:4)  OneDay  Toric  is  a  daily  disposable  toric  contact  lens  made  from  a  polymer  designed  with  a
surface  that  resists  dehydration  and  thus  provides  a  constant  water  content.  The  clinical  study  is
anticipated to commence in 2015.

(cid:127) IDP-118  is  a  fixed  combination  product  with  two  different  mechanisms  of  action  for  treating  psoriasis.

This project has completed Phase 2.

(cid:127) IDP-120 is a combination acne treatment  anticipated  to commence Phase 2 in 2015.
(cid:127) Emerade(cid:4) is an adrenaline (epinephrine) auto-injector used for the emergency treatment of severe acute
allergic  reactions  (anaphylaxis) 
the
foods,  medicines  or 
pre-Investigational  New  Drug  Application  (pre-IND)  stage,  and  the  clinical  study  is  anticipated  to
commence in 2015.

insect  stings.  Emerade(cid:4) 

to 

in 

is 

(cid:127) Arestin(cid:4) (life-cycle management) is an antibiotic treatment for periodontal (gum) disease. The product is

in Phase 3.

RESTRUCTURING AND INTEGRATION

In  connection  with  the  B&L  and  Medicis  acquisitions,  as  well  as  other  smaller  acquisitions,  we  have
implemented  cost-rationalization  and  integration  initiatives  to  capture  operating  synergies  and  generate  cost
savings across the Company. These measures included:

(cid:127) workforce reductions across the Company and  other organizational  changes;

(cid:127) closing  of  duplicative  facilities  and  other  site  rationalization  actions  company-wide,  including  research

and development facilities, sales offices and corporate facilities;

(cid:127) leveraging research and development  spend; and

(cid:127) procurement savings.

B&L Acquisition-Related Cost-Rationalization  and Integration Initiatives

The  complementary  nature  of  the  Company  and  B&L  businesses  has  provided  an  opportunity  to  capture
significant operating synergies from reductions in sales and marketing, general and administrative expenses, and
research and development. In total, we have identified greater than $900 million of cost synergies on an annual
run  rate  basis  that  were  substantially  achieved  by  the  end  of  2014.  This  amount  does  not  include  revenue
synergies  or  the  benefits  of  incorporating  B&L’s  operations  into  the  Company’s  corporate  structure.  We
estimate  that  we  will  incur  total  costs  of  approximately  $600  million  (excluding  the  charges  of  $52.8  million
described  in  note  5  of  notes  to  consolidated  financial  statements  in  Item  15  of  this  Form  10-K)  in  connection
with these cost-rationalization and integration initiatives, which were substantially completed by the end of 2014.

Medicis Acquisition-Related Cost-Rationalization and Integration  Initiatives

The complementary nature of the Company and Medicis businesses has provided an opportunity to capture
significant operating synergies from reductions in sales and marketing, general and administrative expenses, and
research  and  development.  In  total,  we  realized  over  $300  million  of  cost  synergies  on  a  run  rate  basis  as  of

34

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

December  31,  2013.  We  estimate  that  we  will  incur  total  costs  of  approximately  $200  million  (excluding  the
charges  of  $77.3  million  described  in  note  5  of  notes  to  consolidated  financial  statements  in  Item  15  of  this
Form  10-K)  in  connection  with  these  cost-rationalization  and  integration  initiatives,  which  were  substantially
completed  by  the  end  of  2013.  However,  additional  costs  have  been  incurred  in  2014,  and  we  expect  to  incur
certain costs during the next three months.

See  note  5  of  notes  to  consolidated  financial  statements  in  Item  15  of  this  Form  10-K  for  detailed
information  summarizing  the  major  components  of  costs  incurred  in  connection  with  our  B&L  and  Medicis
acquisition-related initiatives through  December 31, 2014.

U.S. HEALTHCARE REFORM

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the ‘‘Act’’) was enacted in the U.S. The Act
contains several provisions that impact our business. Certain provisions of the Act became effective in 2010 or
2011,  while  other  provisions  have  or  will  become  effective  on  subsequent  dates.  The  principal  provisions
affecting  our  industry  provide  for  the  following:  (i)  an  increase  in  the  minimum  Medicaid  rebate  to  states
participating  in  the  Medicaid  program  from  15.1%  to  23.1%  on  covered  drugs  (effective  January  1,  2010);
(ii)  the  extension  of  the  Medicaid  rebates  to  Managed  Care  Organizations  that  dispense  drugs  to  Medicaid
beneficiaries  (effective  March  23,  2010);  (iii)  the  expansion  of  the  340(B)  Public  Health  Services  drug  pricing
program,  which  provides  outpatient  drugs  at  reduced  rates,  to  include  additional  hospitals,  clinics,  and
healthcare  centers  (effective  January  1,  2010);  and  (iv)  a  fee  payable  to  the  federal  government  based  on  our
prior-calendar-year  share  relative  to  other  companies  of  branded  prescription  drug  sales  to  specified
government programs (effective January 1, 2011, with the total fee to be paid each year by the pharmaceutical
industry increasing annually through  2018).

In addition to the above, in 2013: (i) federal subsidies began to be phased in for brand-name prescription
drugs filled in the Medicare Part D cover gap and (ii) the law requires the medical device industry to subsidize
healthcare  reform  in  the  form  of  a  2.3%  excise  tax  on  U.S.  sales  of  most  medical  devices.  In  2014,  the  Act’s
private health insurance exchanges began to operate along with the mandate on individuals to purchase health
insurance. The Act also allows states to expand Medicaid coverage with most of the expansion’s cost paid for by
the federal government.

The Act did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations in 2014, 2013 or
2012.  In  2014,  2013  and  2012,  we  incurred  costs  of  $9.3  million,  $3.1  million  and  $1.8  million,  respectively,
related  to  the  annual  fee  assessed  on  prescription  drug  manufacturers  and  importers  that  sell  branded
prescription drugs to specified U.S. government programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid). We also incurred costs
of $42.8 million, $28.8 million and $9.8 million on Medicare Part D utilization incurred by beneficiaries whose
prescription drug costs cause them to be subject to the Medicare Part D coverage gap (i.e., the ‘‘donut hole’’) in
2014,  2013  and  2012,  respectively.  Under  the  legislation,  the  total  cost  incurred  by  us  for  the  medical  device
excise tax during 2014 and 2013 was  $6.0  million and $4.2 million, respectively.

In July 2014, the Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations related to the branded pharmaceutical
drug annual fee pursuant to the Act. Under the final regulations, an entity’s obligation to pay the annual fee is
triggered by qualifying sales in the current year, rather than the liability being triggered upon the first qualifying
sale of the following year. We adopted this guidance in the third quarter of 2014, and it did not have a material
impact on our financial position or results  of  operations.

The financial impact of the Act may be affected by certain additional developments over the next few years,

including pending implementation guidance  and certain healthcare reform proposals.

35

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following table provides selected  financial information for each of the last  three years:

Years Ended December 31,

2014

$

2013

$

2012

$

8,263.5

5,769.6

3,480.4

2,493.9

Change

2013  to  2014

2012 to 2013

$

%

43

$

2,289.2

%

66

913.5

(866.1)

(116.0)

1,779.6

NM

(750.1)

647

2.72
2.67

(2.70)
(2.70)

(0.38)
(0.38)

5.42
5.37

NM
NM

(2.32)
(2.32)

611
611

($ in millions,  except per share data)

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income  (loss) attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

International,  Inc.

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Valeant

Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NM — Not meaningful

Financial Performance

Changes in Revenues

Total revenues increased $2.5 billion, or 43%, to $8.3 billion in 2014, primarily due to incremental product
sales revenue of $2,279.9 million, in the aggregate, from all 2013 acquisitions and all 2014 acquisitions and an
increase  of  $30.6  million  in  other  revenues,  partially  offset  by  (i)  a  negative  impact  from  divestitures,
discontinuations and supply interruptions of $322.8 million in 2014 and (ii) a negative foreign currency exchange
impact  on  the  existing  business  of  $164.5  million  in  2014.  Excluding  the  items  described  above,  we  realized
incremental product sales revenue of $670.7 million in 2014 related to growth from the remainder of the existing
business, partially offset by the impact  of generic competition in  the Developed Markets segment.

Total revenues increased $2.3 billion, or 66%, to $5.8 billion in 2013, primarily due to incremental product
sales revenue of $2,466.6 million, in the aggregate, from all 2012 acquisitions and all 2013 acquisitions, partially
offset by (i) a decrease in product sales in the Developed Markets segment of $293.9 million, in the aggregate,
due to the impact of generic competition, (ii) a negative impact from divestitures, discontinuations and supply
interruptions of $67.8 million in 2013, (iii) a decrease in alliance and royalty revenue of $53.0 million, primarily
related to the $45.0 million milestone payment received from GlaxoSmithKline (‘‘GSK’’) in connection with the
launch of Potiga(cid:4) recognized in the second quarter of 2012 that did not similarly occur in 2013, (iv) a negative
foreign currency exchange impact on the existing business of $24.4 million in 2013, and (v) a decrease in service
revenue of $9.5 million in 2013, primarily due to lower contract manufacturing revenue from the Laval, Quebec
facility. Excluding the items described above, we realized incremental product sales revenue of $271.2 million in
2013 related to growth from the remainder of  the existing business.

The above changes in revenues are further described below under ‘‘Results of Operations — Revenues by

Segment’’.

As  is  customary  in  the  pharmaceutical  industry,  our  gross  product  sales  are  subject  to  a  variety  of
deductions in arriving at reported net product sales. Provisions for these deductions are recorded concurrently
with the recognition of gross product sales revenue and include cash discounts and allowances, chargebacks, and
distribution fees, which are paid to direct customers, as well as rebates and returns, which can be paid to both
direct and indirect customers. Provision balances relating to estimated amounts payable to direct customers are
netted against accounts receivable, and balances relating to indirect customers are included in accrued liabilities.

36

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

The provisions recorded to reduce gross product sales to net product sales for each of the last three years were
as follows:

($ in millions)

Years Ended December  31,

2014

$

2013

$

2012

$

Gross product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provisions to reduce gross product sales to net product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11,593.9
3,490.3

7,849.8
2,209.5

4,067.5
778.9

Net product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8,103.6

5,640.3

3,288.6

Percentage of provisions to gross sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30%

28%

19%

Provisions  as  a  percentage  of  gross  sales  increased  to  30%  in  2014  from  28%  in  2013.  The  increase  was
driven primarily by higher provisions for returns and rebates, including the new co-pay assistance programs for
launch products including Jublia(cid:4), Luzu(cid:4), and Retin-A Micro(cid:4) Microsphere 0.08% (‘‘RAM 0.08%’’), as well as
increased  sales  of  generic  products  and  Wellbutrin  XL(cid:4)  (to  the  U.S.  government),  which  have  higher  rebate
percentages.

Provisions  as  a  percentage  of  gross  sales  increased  to  28%  in  2013  from  19%  in  2012.  The  increase  was
driven primarily by higher provisions from the acquisition of Medicis products, including Solodyn(cid:4), Zyclara(cid:4) and
Ziana(cid:4), which have higher rebate percentages.

Changes in Earnings Attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals  International, Inc.

Net  income  attributable  to  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  was  $913.5  million  in  2014,
compared  with  net  loss  attributable  to  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  of  $866.1  million  in  2013,
reflecting  the  following  factors:  (i)  an  increase  in  contribution  (product  sales  revenue  less  cost  of  goods  sold,
exclusive of amortization and impairments of finite-lived intangible assets) of $2,113.4 million in 2014, (ii) higher
impairment charges in 2013 (primarily driven by the impairment charge for ezogabine/retigabine) and (iii) a net
gain  related  to  the  divestiture  of  facial  aesthetic  fillers  and  toxins  assets  in  2014,  partially  offset  by  (iv)  an
increase  in  selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses,  (v)  an  increase  in  the  provision  for  income  taxes  and
(vi)  an  increase  in  non-operating  expense,  net  which  included  increases  in  interest  expense,  loss  on
extinguishment of debt, and foreign exchange and other which were partially offset by the net gain recognized in
connection with the sale by PS Fund 1, LLC  (‘‘PS Fund 1’’) of the Allergan Inc. (‘‘Allergan’’)  shares.

Net  loss  attributable  to  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  increased  $750.1  million,  to
$866.1 million in 2013, reflecting the following factors: (i) an increase in operating expenses (driven largely by
higher  impairments  charges  in  2013)  and  (ii)  an  increase  in  non-operating  expenses  (driven  by  an  increase  in
interest expense in 2013), partially offset by (iii) an increase in contribution (product sales revenue less cost of
goods  sold,  exclusive  of  amortization  and  impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible  assets)  of  $1,410.5  million  in
2013.

The above changes are further described  below  under ‘‘Results of Operations’’.

Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest

Net  loss  attributable  to  noncontrolling  interest  was  $1.3  million  in  2014  and  net  income  attributable  to
noncontrolling  interest  was  $2.5  million  in  2013.  Net  (loss)  income  attributable  to  noncontrolling  interest  is
primarily related to the performance of joint ventures acquired in connection with the  B&L  Acquisition.

37

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Reportable Segments

We have two operating and reportable segments: (i) Developed Markets, and (ii) Emerging Markets. The

following is a brief description of our segments  as of December 31, 2014:

(cid:127) Developed Markets consists of (i) sales in the U.S. of pharmaceutical products, OTC products, and medical
device products, as well as alliance and contract service revenues, in the areas of eye health, dermatology
and podiatry, aesthetics, and dentistry, (ii) sales in the U.S. of pharmaceutical products indicated for the
treatment  of  neurological  and  other  diseases,  as  well  as  alliance  revenue  from  the  licensing  of  various
products we developed or acquired, and (iii) pharmaceutical products, OTC products, and medical device
products sold in Canada, Australia, New  Zealand, Western Europe and Japan.

(cid:127) Emerging  Markets  consists  of  branded  generic  pharmaceutical  products  and  branded  pharmaceuticals,
OTC products, and medical device products. Products are sold primarily in Central and Eastern Europe
(primarily  Poland  and  Russia),  Asia,  Latin  America  (Mexico,  Brazil,  and  Argentina  and  exports  out  of
Mexico to other Latin American markets), Africa and the Middle East.

Revenues By Segment

Our  primary  sources  of  revenues  are  the  sale  of  pharmaceutical  products,  OTC  products,  and  medical
devices. The following table displays revenues by segment for each of the last three years, the percentage of each
segment’s revenues compared with total revenues in the respective year, and the dollar and percentage change in
the dollar amount of each segment’s revenues. Percentages may not sum  due  to  rounding.

Years Ended December 31,

Change

($ in millions)

2014

$

Developed Markets . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging Markets . . . . . . . . . .

6,167.1
2,096.4

2013

$

4,293.2
1,476.4

%

75
25

%

74
26

$

2,502.3
978.1

%

72
28

$

1,873.9
620.0

Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8,263.5

100

5,769.6

100

3,480.4

100

2,493.9

%

44
42

43

$

1,790.9
498.3

2,289.2

%

72
51

66

2012

2013 to 2014

2012 to  2013

Total  revenues  increased  $2.5  billion,  or  43%,  to  $8.3  billion  in  2014  primarily  due  to  growth  from
acquisitions,  including  the  B&L  Acquisition.  The  remaining  growth  in  2014  reflected  both  price  and  volume,
with  slightly  more  than  half  of  the  growth  from  price.  In  the  Developed  Markets,  the  majority  of  growth  was
driven by price, and in the Emerging Markets, the growth was driven almost entirely by volume. The growth was
mainly attributable to the effect of the  following factors:

Developed Markets segment:

(cid:127) the incremental product sales revenue of $1,699.1 million, in the aggregate, from all 2013 acquisitions and
all 2014 acquisitions, primarily from (i) the 2013 acquisition of B&L (driven by Ocuvite(cid:4)/PreserVision(cid:4),
Lotemax(cid:4),  ReNu  Multiplus(cid:4),  and  Biotrue(cid:4)  MultiPurpose  Solution  product  sales)  and  (ii)  the  2014
acquisitions  of  Solta  Medical  (mainly  driven  by  Thermage  CPT(cid:4)  system  product  sales)  and  PreCision
(mainly driven by Clindagel(cid:4) product  sales); and

(cid:127) an increase in other revenues of $22.6  million in 2014, primarily related to higher royalty  revenue.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) a negative impact from divestitures, discontinuations and supply interruptions of $262.5 million in 2014,
primarily driven by a decrease of $173.6 million related to the divestiture in the third quarter of 2014 of

38

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

facial  aesthetic  fillers  and  toxins,  as  well  as  the  discontinuation  of  Maxair(cid:4)  and  the  divestiture  of
Buphenyl(cid:4) in 2013; and

(cid:127) a negative foreign currency exchange impact on the existing business of $59.7 million in 2014 due to the
impact  of  a  strengthening  of  the  U.S.  dollar  against  certain  currencies,  including  the  Canadian  dollar,
Japanese yen, and Australian dollar.

Excluding the items described above, we realized incremental product sales revenue from the remainder of
the existing business of $474.4 million in 2014. The growth reflected (1) higher sales of (i) orphan products
(Syprine(cid:4) and Xenazine(cid:4)), (ii) Targretin(cid:4), (iii) Jublia(cid:4), and (iv) Wellbutrin XL(cid:4) (U.S.) and (2) higher sales
from  recent  product  launches,  including  the  launches  of  RAM  0.08%  and  Luzu(cid:4),  partially  offset  by  a
decrease in product sales of $167.8 million, in the aggregate, due to generic competition. The decrease from
generic competition related to a decline in sales of the Vanos(cid:4), Retin-A Micro(cid:4) (excluding RAM 0.08%),
and Zovirax(cid:4) franchises and Wellbutrin(cid:4) XL (Canada). We anticipate a continuing decline in sales of the
Vanos(cid:4)  franchise  and  Wellbutrin(cid:4)  XL  (Canada)  due  to  continued  generic  erosion.  However,  the  rate  of
decline  is  expected  to  decrease  in  the  future,  and  these  brands  are  expected  to  represent  a  declining
percentage of total revenues primarily due to anticipated growth in other parts of our business and recent
acquisitions.

Emerging Markets segment:

(cid:127) the  incremental  product  sales  revenue  of  $580.8  million  (which  includes  a  negative  foreign  currency
exchange impact of $22.3 million), in the aggregate, from all 2013 acquisitions and all 2014 acquisitions,
primarily  from  the  2013  acquisition  of  B&L  (driven  by  ReNu  Multiplus(cid:4),  Ocuvite(cid:4),  and  Artelac(cid:5)
product  sales)  and  the  2014  acquisition  of  Solta  Medical  (mainly  driven  by  Thermage  CPT(cid:4)  system
product  sales).

This factor was partially offset by:

(cid:127) a negative foreign currency exchange impact on the existing business of $104.8 million in 2014 due to the
impact of a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against certain currencies, including the Russian ruble; and

(cid:127) a  negative  impact  from  divestitures,  discontinuations  and  supply  interruptions  of  $60.3  million  in  2014,

primarily from Eastern Europe and Brazil.

Excluding the items described above, we realized incremental product sales revenue from the remainder of
the existing business of $196.3 million in 2014. The growth reflected higher sales in Eastern Europe, Middle
East and North Africa, Southeast Asia and Mexico.

Total revenues increased $2.3 billion, or 66%, to $5.8 billion in 2013, mainly attributable to the effect of the

following factors:

Developed Markets segment:

(cid:127) the  incremental  product  sales  revenue  of  $2,051.0  million  (which  includes  a  negative  foreign  currency
exchange impact of $12.5 million), in the aggregate, from all 2012 acquisitions and all 2013 acquisitions,
primarily  from  (i)  the  2012  acquisitions  of  Medicis  (mainly  driven  by  Solodyn(cid:4),  Restylane(cid:4),  Dysport(cid:4),
Vanos(cid:4), Ziana(cid:4) and Perlane(cid:4) product sales) and OraPharma (mainly driven by Arestin(cid:4) product sales),
and  (ii)  the  2013  acquisitions  of  B&L  (driven  by  Lotemax(cid:4)  Gel,  PreserVision(cid:4)  and  SofLens(cid:4)  Daily
Disposable Contact Lenses product sales) and Obagi (mainly driven by Nu-Derm(cid:4) and Obagi-C(cid:4) product
sales).

This factor was partially offset by:
(cid:127) decrease in product sales of $293.9 million in 2013, primarily related to a decline in sales of the Zovirax(cid:4)

franchise, Retin-A Micro(cid:4), BenzaClin(cid:4) and Cesamet(cid:4) due to generic competition;

39

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(cid:127) a  decrease  in  alliance  and  royalty  revenue  of  $59.8  million,  primarily  related  to  the  $45.0  million
milestone payment received from GSK in connection with the launch of Potiga(cid:4) recognized in the second
quarter of 2012 that did not similarly occur in  2013;

(cid:127) a  negative  impact  from  divestitures,  discontinuations  and  supply  interruptions  of  $44.8  million  in  2013.
The largest contributors were the discontinuation of Dermaglow(cid:4) and the divestitures of certain brands
sold primarily in Australia;

(cid:127) a negative foreign currency exchange  impact on the existing business  of $19.9 million in 2013; and

(cid:127) a  decrease  in  service  revenue  of  $5.1  million  in  2013,  primarily  due  to  lower  contract  manufacturing

revenue from the Laval, Quebec facility.

Excluding the items described above, we realized incremental product sales revenue from the remainder of
the existing business of $163.4 million in 2013, driven by growth of the core dermatology brands, including
CeraVe(cid:4) and Acanya(cid:4). The growth in 2013 was driven primarily by  price.

Emerging Markets segment:

(cid:127) the  incremental  product  sales  revenue  of  $415.6  million  (which  includes  a  negative  foreign  currency
exchange  impact  of  $9.7  million),  in  the  aggregate,  from  all  2012  acquisitions  and  all  2013  acquisitions,
primarily from (i) the 2012 acquisition of certain assets of Gerot Lannach and (ii) the 2013 acquisitions of
B&L  (driven  by  ReNu  Multiplus(cid:4),  SofLens(cid:4)  and  SofLens(cid:4)  Daily  Disposable  Contact  Lenses  product
sales) and Natur Produkt.

This factor was partially offset by:

(cid:127) a  negative  impact  from  divestitures,  discontinuations  and  supply  interruptions  of  $23.0  million  in  2013;

and

(cid:127) a negative foreign currency exchange  impact on the existing business  of $4.5 million in 2013.

Excluding the items described above, we realized incremental product sales revenue from the remainder of
the existing business of $107.8 million in 2013 driven by growth in Poland and Russia. The main driver of
this  growth was volume.

Segment Profit

Segment  profit  is  based  on  operating  income  after  the  elimination  of  intercompany  transactions.  Certain
costs, such as restructuring and acquisition-related costs, in-process research and development impairments and
other charges and other (income) expense, are not included in the measure of segment profit, as management
excludes  these  items  in  assessing  segment  financial  performance.  In  addition,  a  portion  of  share-based
compensation  is  not  allocated  to  segments,  since  the  amount  of  such  expense  depends  on  company-wide
performance rather than the operating  performance of  any single segment.

40

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

The  following  table  displays  profit  by  segment  for  each  of  the  last  three  years,  the  percentage  of  each
segment’s  profit  compared  with  corresponding  segment  revenues  in  the  respective  year,  and  the  dollar  and
percentage change in the dollar amount  of each segment’s  profit. Percentages may not add  due  to  rounding.

Years Ended December 31,

Change

2014

2013

2012

2013 to 2014

2012 to 2013

($ in millions)

$

%(1)

$

%(1)

$

%(1)

$

Developed Markets . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging Markets . . . . . . . . . . .

2,019.7
337.3

Total segment profit . . . . . . . . . .

2,357.0

33
16

29

573.2
93.0

666.2

13
6

12

815.9
69.0

884.9

33
7

25

1,446.5
244.3

1,690.8

%

252
263

254

$

%

(242.7)
24.0

(30)
35

(218.7)

(25)

(1) — Represents profit as a percentage of the corresponding revenues.

Total segment profit increased $1.7 billion, or 254%, to $2.4 billion in 2014, mainly attributable to the effect

of the following factors:

Developed Markets segment:

(cid:127) an increase in contribution of $1,140.2 million, in the aggregate, from all 2013 acquisitions and all 2014
acquisitions,  primarily  from  the  product  sales  of  B&L,  Solta  Medical  and  PreCision,  including  higher
expenses for acquisition accounting adjustments related to inventory of $28.8 million, in the aggregate, in
2014; and

(cid:127) a favorable impact of $307.4 million related to the existing business acquisition accounting adjustments

related to inventory in 2013 that did  not  similarly occur in 2014.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) a  decrease  in  contribution  related  to  divestitures,  discontinuations  and  supply  interruptions  of
$214.2  million  in  2014,  primarily  driven  by  a  decrease  in  contribution  of  $149.0  million  related  to  the
divestiture of facial aesthetic fillers and toxins in the  third quarter  of 2014;

(cid:127) an  increase  in  operating  expenses  (including  amortization  and  impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible
assets) of $202.2 million in 2014 primarily due to the acquisitions of new businesses within the segment,
partially  offset  by  the  impairment  charge  of  $551.6  million  related  to  ezogabine/retigabine  in  the  third
quarter of 2013; and

(cid:127) a negative foreign currency exchange impact on the existing business contribution of $45.4 million in 2014
due to the impact of a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against certain currencies, including the Canadian
dollar, Japanese yen, and Australian dollar.

Excluding  the  items  described  above,  we  realized  incremental  contribution  from  product  sales  from  the
remainder  of  the  existing  business  of  $434.4  million  in  2014,  driven  by  (1)  higher  sales  of  (i)  orphan
products  (Syprine(cid:4)  and  Xenazine(cid:4)),  (ii)  Targretin(cid:4),  (iii)  Jublia(cid:4),  and  (iv)  Wellbutrin  XL(cid:4)  (U.S.)  and
(2) higher sales from recent product launches, including the launches of RAM 0.08% and Luzu(cid:4), partially
offset by a decrease in contribution of $160.2  million related to a decline in sales  of the Vanos(cid:4), Retin-A
Micro(cid:4) (excluding RAM 0.08%), and Zovirax(cid:4) franchises and Wellbutrin(cid:4) XL (Canada) as a result of the
continued impact of generic competition.

Emerging Markets segment:

(cid:127) an  increase  in  contribution  of  $378.6  million,  in  the  aggregate,  from  all  2013  acquisitions  and  all  2014

acquisitions, primarily from the sale of B&L and Solta Medical products; and

41

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(cid:127) a  favorable  impact  of  $65.3  million  related  to  the  existing  business  acquisition  accounting  adjustments

related to inventory in 2013 that did  not  similarly occur in 2014.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) an  increase  in  operating  expenses  (including  amortization  and  impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible
assets) of $250.3 million in 2014, primarily associated with the acquisitions of new businesses within the
segment;

(cid:127) a negative foreign currency exchange impact on the existing business contribution of $65.0 million in 2014
due to the impact of a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against certain currencies, including the Russian
ruble; and

(cid:127) a  decrease  in  contribution  related  to  divestitures,  discontinuations  and  supply  interruptions  of

$38.2 million in 2014.

Excluding  the  items  described  above,  we  realized  incremental  contribution  from  product  sales  from  the
remainder of the existing business of $149.2 million in 2014. The growth reflected higher sales in Eastern
Europe, Middle East and North Africa,  Southeast  Asia and  Mexico.

Total segment profit decreased $218.7 million, or 25%, to $666.2 million in 2013, mainly attributable to the

effect of the following factors:

Developed Markets segment:

(cid:127) an increase in contribution of $1,278.5 million, in the aggregate, from all 2012 acquisitions and all 2013
acquisitions, primarily from the product sales of Medicis, B&L, Obagi and OraPharma, including higher
expenses for acquisition accounting adjustments related to inventory of $285.6 million, in the aggregate;
and

(cid:127) a  favorable  impact  of  $54.1  million  related  to  the  existing  business  acquisition  accounting  adjustments

related to inventory in 2012 that did  not  similarly occur in 2013.

Those factors were more than offset by:

(cid:127) an  increase  in  operating  expenses  (including  amortization  and  impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible
assets)  of  $1,333.6  million  in  2013,  primarily  due  to  an  impairment  charge  of  $551.6  million  related  to
ezogabine/retigabine  in  the  third  quarter  of  2013  and  the  acquisitions  of  new  businesses  within  the
segment.  See  note  6  to  the  2014  Financial  Statements  for  additional  information  regarding  the
ezogabine/retigabine impairment;

(cid:127) a decrease in contribution of $286.7 million in 2013, primarily related to the lower sales of the Zovirax(cid:4)
franchise,  Retin-A  Micro(cid:4),  BenzaClin(cid:4)  and  Cesamet(cid:4)  as  a  result  of  the  continued  impact  of  generic
competition;

(cid:127) alliance  revenue  of  $45.0  million  recognized  in  the  second  quarter  of  2012,  related  to  the  milestone
payment received from GSK in connection with the launch of Potiga(cid:4) that did not similarly occur in 2013;

(cid:127) a decrease in contribution of $39.6 million in 2013, primarily related to divestitures, discontinuations and

supply interruptions; and

(cid:127) a  negative  foreign  currency  exchange  impact  on  the  existing  business  contribution  of  $14.3  million  in

2013.

Excluding  the  items  described  above,  we  realized  incremental  contribution  from  product  sales  from  the
remainder  of  the  existing  business  of  $155.2  million,  driven  by  growth  of  the  core  dermatology  brands,
including CeraVe(cid:4) and Acanya(cid:4).

42

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Emerging Markets segment:

(cid:127) an  increase  in  contribution  of  $201.5  million,  in  the  aggregate,  from  all  2012  acquisitions  and  all  2013
acquisitions,  primarily  from  the  sale  of  B&L,  Natur  Produkt  and  Gerot  Lannach  products,  including
higher  expenses  for  acquisition  accounting  adjustments  related  to  inventory  of  $62.1  million,  in  the
aggregate; and

(cid:127) an increase in alliance contribution of $6.1  million  in 2013.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) an  increase  in  operating  expenses  (including  amortization  and  impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible
assets) of $240.0 million in 2013, primarily associated with the acquisitions of new businesses within the
segment;

(cid:127) a  decrease  in  contribution  of  $12.0  million  in  2013  related  to  divestitures,  discontinuations  and  supply

interruptions; and

(cid:127) a negative foreign currency exchange impact on the existing business contribution of $2.4 million in 2013.

Excluding  the  items  described  above,  we  realized  incremental  contribution  from  product  sales  from  the
remainder of the existing business of $70.9  million  in 2013.

Operating Expenses

The following table displays the dollar amount of each operating expense category for each of the last three
years, the percentage of each category compared with total revenues in the respective year, and the dollar and
percentage changes in the dollar amount  of each category. Percentages  may not sum due to rounding.

($ in millions)

Years Ended December 31,

Change

2014

2013

2012

2013 to 2014

2012 to 2013

$

%(1)

$

%(1)

$

%(1)

$

%

$

%

Cost  of  goods sold  (exclusive  of amortization and

impairments of finite-lived intangible assets  shown
separately below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,196.2
Cost  of  other revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
58.4
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,026.3
Research and development
246.0
Amortization and impairments of  finite-lived

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,550.7
381.7

Restructuring, integration  and other  costs . . . . . . . .
In-process research and development  impairments

27
1
25
3

19
5

1,846.3
58.8
1,305.2
156.8

1,902.0
462.0

and other  charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related contingent consideration . . . . . .
Other (income) expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41.0 —
6.3 —
(14.1) —
(3)

(268.7)

153.6
36.4
(29.2)
287.2

32
1
23
3

33
8

3
1
(1)
5

905.1
64.6
756.1
79.1

928.9
267.1

26
2
22
2

27
8

5
189.9
78.6
2
(5.3) —
4

136.6

349.9
(0.4)
721.1
89.2

19
(1)
55
57

941.2 104
(9)
73
98

(5.8)
549.1
77.7

(351.3)
(80.3)

(18)
(17)

973.1 105
73
194.9

(112.6)
(30.1)
15.1

(36.3) (19)
(42.2) (54)
(23.9) 451
(555.9) NM 150.6 110

(73)
(83)
(52)

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,223.8

75

6,179.1

107

3,400.7

98

44.7

1 2,778.4

82

(1) — Represents the percentage for each category as compared to total revenues.

NM — Not meaningful

Cost of Goods Sold (exclusive of amortization  and impairments  of finite-lived  intangible  assets)

Cost  of  goods  sold  includes:  manufacturing  and  packaging;  the  cost  of  products  we  purchase  from  third
parties; royalty payments we make to third parties; depreciation of manufacturing facilities and equipment; and
lower  of  cost  or  market  adjustments  to  inventories.  Cost  of  goods  sold  excludes  the  amortization  and

43

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible  assets  described  separately  below  under 
Impairments of Finite-Lived Intangible Assets’’.

‘‘— Amortization  and

Cost  of  goods  sold  increased  $349.9  million,  or  19%,  to  $2.2  billion  in  2014.  As  a  percentage  of  revenue,

Cost of goods sold decreased to 27% in  2014 as compared to 32% in 2013, primarily  due  to:

(cid:127) the impact of lower acquisition accounting adjustments of $345.1 million in 2014, primarily related to the
fair value step-up for acquired inventory from the B&L and Medicis acquisitions which was expensed in
2013 that did not similarly occur in 2014; and

(cid:127) a  favorable  impact  from  product  mix  driven  by  new  product  launches,  including  Jublia(cid:4),  Luzu(cid:4),  and

RAM 0.08%. These products have a higher gross profit margin than our overall margin.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) an unfavorable impact from product mix related to (i) the product portfolio acquired as part of the B&L
Acquisition and (ii) decreased sales of certain products in the Developed Markets segment due to generic
competition (as described above) which  have a higher gross profit margin than our overall margin.

Cost of goods sold increased $941.2 million, or 104%, to $1.8 billion in 2013. As a percentage of revenue,

Cost of goods sold increased to 32%  in  2013 as compared  to 26% in 2012, primarily  due  to:

(cid:127) the impact of higher acquisition accounting adjustments of $293.6 million in 2013, primarily related to the

fair value step-up for acquired inventories that  were sold in 2013;

(cid:127) an  unfavorable  impact  from  product  mix  related  to  the  product  portfolio  acquired  as  part  of  the  B&L

Acquisition;

(cid:127) decreased  sales  of  the  Zovirax(cid:4)  franchise,  Retin-A  Micro(cid:4),  BenzaClin(cid:4)  and  Cesamet(cid:4)  which  have  a

higher  gross profit margin than our overall  margin; and

(cid:127) higher sales of Xenazine(cid:4) which has a lower margin than our overall margin.

These factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) a favorable impact from product mix related to the Medicis product portfolio; and

(cid:127) the  benefits  realized  from  worldwide  manufacturing  rationalization  initiatives  primarily  from  Latin

America and Canada.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  include:  employee  compensation  costs  associated  with  sales
and  marketing,  finance,  legal,  information  technology,  human  resources,  and  other  administrative  functions;
outside  legal  fees  and  consultancy  costs;  product  promotion  expenses;  overhead  and  occupancy  costs;
depreciation of corporate facilities and equipment; and other general and administrative  costs.

Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  increased  $721.1  million,  or  55%,  to  $2.0  billion  in  2014,
primarily due to increased expenses in our Developed Markets segment ($531.2 million) and Emerging Markets
segment ($181.4 million), primarily driven by the acquisitions of new businesses within each segment, including
the B&L Acquisition, partially offset by the realization of cost  synergies.

As  a  percentage  of  revenue,  Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  increased  to  25%  in  2014  as
compared to 23% in 2013, primarily due to (i) incremental costs incurred from the full year impact of expenses
related to the B&L Acquisition, (ii) higher expenses related to recent and upcoming product launches, including
the recent launches of Jublia(cid:4), Luzu(cid:4), and RAM 0.08%, (iii) expenses associated with sales force expansion for
the dermatology and contact lens businesses, and (iv) higher share-based compensation expenses. See note 15 to
the 2014 Financial Statements for additional  information  related  to  share-based compensation.

44

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  increased  $549.1  million,  or  73%,  to  $1.3  billion  in  2013,
primarily  due  to  (i)  increased  expenses  in  our  Developed  Markets  segment  ($367.8  million)  and  Emerging
Markets segment ($155.2 million), primarily driven by the acquisitions of new businesses within each segment,
including  the  B&L  and  Medicis  acquisitions,  partially  offset  by  the  realization  of  cost  synergies  and  (ii)  net
incremental  compensation  expense  of  $15.5  million  in  the  second  quarter  of  2013  related  to  certain  equity
awards held by current non-management directors which were modified from units settled in common shares to
units settled in cash. See note 15 to the 2014 Financial Statements  for additional information.

As  a  percentage  of  revenue,  Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  increased  to  23%  in  2013  as
compared to 22% in 2012, primarily due to timing of costs incurred and realization of synergies from the B&L
Acquisition.  The  increase  in  2013  was  also  impacted  by  the  net  incremental  compensation  expense  of
$15.5  million  recognized  in  the  second  quarter  of  2013  (equates  to  0.3%  of  2013  revenue)  described  in  the
preceding paragraph.

Research and Development Expenses

Expenses related to research and development programs include: employee compensation costs; overhead
and  occupancy  costs;  depreciation  of  research  and  development  facilities  and  equipment;  clinical  trial  costs;
clinical manufacturing and scale-up costs; and other third-party development  costs.

Research and development expenses increased $89.2 million, or 57%, to $246.0 million in 2014, primarily
due  to  higher  spending  on  programs  acquired  in  the  B&L  Acquisition,  including  Vesneo(cid:5)  (latanoprostene
bunod),  Lotemax(cid:4)  life  cycle  programs,  and  brimonidine,  partially  offset  by  lower  spending  on  Jublia(cid:4)
(efinaconazole 10% topical solution). In June 2014, the FDA approved the NDA for Jublia(cid:4), and the product
was launched.

Research and development expenses increased $77.7 million, or 98%, to $156.8 million in 2013, primarily
due  to  spending  on  programs  acquired  in  the  B&L  Acquisition,  including  latanoprostene  bunod  and  the  next
generation  silicone  hydrogel  lens  (Bausch  +  Lomb  Ultra(cid:4)),  partially  offset  by  lower  spending  on
ezogabine/retigabine reflecting the U.S.  launch in  the second quarter of 2012.

See note 3 to the 2014 Financial Statements for additional information  relating to the B&L Acquisition.

Amortization and Impairments of Finite-Lived Intangible  Assets

Amortization  and  impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible  assets  decreased  $351.3  million,  or  18%,  to
$1.6  billion  in  2014,  primarily  due  to  (i)  a  decrease  of  $631.0  million  for  ezogabine/retigabine  due  to  the
impairment  charge  of  $551.6  million  recognized  in  the  third  quarter  of  2013  (which  also  resulted  in  lower
amortization expense in 2014), (ii) a decrease in amortization of the divested facial aesthetic fillers and toxins
assets which were divested in July 2014 of $43.7 million, (iii) impairment charges of $31.5 million recognized in
2013  related  to  the  write-down  of  the  carrying  values  of  assets  held  for  sale  related  to  certain  suncare  and
skincare brands sold primarily in Australia, and (iv) a $22.2 million write-off recognized in 2013 related to the
Opana(cid:4)  intangible  asset,  partially  offset  by  (v)  an  increase  in  amortization  of  the  B&L,  Solta  Medical  and
PreCision identifiable intangible assets of $242.6 million, in the aggregate, in 2014, (vi) a $55.2 million write-off
recognized in 2014 related to the Kinerase(cid:4) intangible asset, and (vii) a $32.4 million write-off in 2014 related to
the Grifulvin(cid:4)  intangible asset.

Amortization  and  impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible  assets  increased  $973.1  million,  or  105%,  to
$1.9  billion  in  2013,  primarily  due  to  (i)  a  net  increase  of  $525.1  million  for  ezogabine/retigabine,  as  the
impairment charge of $551.6 million in the third quarter of 2013 was partially offset by lower amortization for
ezogabine/retigabine of $26.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2013, (ii) the amortization of $351.9 million, in the
aggregate,  in  2013,  primarily  related  to  the  Medicis,  B&L,  and  Obagi  identifiable  intangible  assets,
(iii) impairment charges of $31.5 million related to the write-down of the carrying values of assets held for sale
related to certain suncare and skincare brands sold primarily in Australia in 2013, (iv) $22.2 million related to

45

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

the  write-off  of  the  carrying  value  of  the  Opana(cid:4)  intangible  asset  in  2013,  (v)  an  increase  in  the  write-offs  of
$16.9  million,  in  the  aggregate,  in  2013,  primarily  related  to  the  discontinuation  of  certain  products  in  the
Brazilian, Canadian, and Polish markets, and (vi) $10.0 million related to the write-off of certain OTC skincare
products in the U.S. in 2013.

As  part  of  our  ongoing  assessment  of  potential  impairment  indicators  related  to  our  finite-lived  and
indefinite-lived  intangible  assets,  we  will  closely  monitor  the  performance  of  our  product  portfolio.  If  our
ongoing assessments reveal indications of impairment, we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary
and such charge could be material.

Restructuring, Integration and Other Costs

We  recognized  restructuring,  integration,  and  other  costs  of  $381.7  million  in  2014,  compared  with
$462.0  million  and  $267.1  million  in  2013  and  2012,  respectively,  primarily  related  to  the  B&L,  Solta  Medical
and PreCision acquisitions. Refer to  note  5  to  the 2014 Financial  Statements for further  details.

In-Process Research and Development Impairments and Other Charges

In-process  research  and  development  impairments  and  other  charges  represents  impairments  and  other
costs associated with compounds, new indications, or line extensions under development that have not received
regulatory  approval  for  marketing  at  the  time  of  acquisition.  IPR&D  acquired  through  an  asset  acquisition  is
written  off  at  the  acquisition  date  if  the  assets  have  no  alternative  future  use.  IPR&D  acquired  in  a  business
combination  is  capitalized  as  indefinite-lived  intangible  assets  (irrespective  of  whether  these  assets  have  an
alternative  future  use)  until  completion  or  abandonment  of  the  related  research  and  development  activities.
Costs associated with the development of  acquired IPR&D assets are  expensed as incurred.

In  2014,  we  recorded  charges  of  $41.0  million  primarily  due  to  (i)  the  write-off  of  an  IPR&D  asset  of
$12.5  million  related  to  analysis  of  Phase  2  study  data  for  a  dermatological  product  candidate  acquired  in  the
December  2012  Medicis  acquisition,  (ii)  an  up-front  payment  of  $12.0  million  made  in  connection  with  an
amendment  to  a  license  and  distribution  agreement  with  a  third  party,  and  (iii)  payments  to  third  parties
associated  with  the  achievement  of  specific  development  milestones  prior  to  regulatory  approval  under  our
research and development programs,  including Jublia(cid:4), in 2014.

In 2013, we recorded charges of $153.6 million, primarily due to the write-off of (i) $93.8 million relating to
the modified-release formulation of ezogabine/retigabine, (ii) $27.3 million of IPR&D assets, mainly related to
the termination of the A007 (Lacrisert(cid:4)) development program, (iii) $14.4 million related to the termination of
the  Mapracorat  development  program,  and  (iv)  $8.8  million  related  to  a  Xerese(cid:4)  life-cycle  product.  Refer
note 10 to the 2014 Financial Statements  for additional  information.

In  2012,  we  recorded  charges  of  $189.9  million,  primarily  due  to  (i)  $133.4  million  for  the  write-off  of  an
acquired IPR&D asset related to the IDP-107 dermatology program, which was acquired in September 2010 as
part  of  the  merger  with  Valeant,  (ii)  an  impairment  charge  of  $24.7  million  related  to  a  Xerese(cid:4)  life-cycle
product, and (iii) $12.0 million related to a payment to terminate a research and development commitment with
a third party. Refer note 10 to the 2014 Financial  Statements  for additional information.

Acquisition-Related Costs

Acquisition-related costs decreased $30.1 million, or 83%, to $6.3 million in 2014, reflecting higher expenses
incurred  in  2013  related  to  the  B&L,  Obagi  and  Natur  Produkt  acquisitions,  as  well  as  other  acquisitions,
partially offset by acquisition activities in 2014, primarily related to the PreCision and Solta Medical acquisitions.

Acquisition-related  costs  decreased  $42.2  million,  or  54%,  to  $36.4  million  in  2013,  reflecting  higher
expenses  incurred  in  2012  related  to  the  Medicis  and  OraPharma  acquisitions  and  other  2012  acquisitions,
partially  offset  by  acquisition  activities  in  2013  primarily  related  to  the  B&L,  Obagi  and  Natur  Produkt
acquisitions.

46

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

See  note  3  to  the  2014  Financial  Statements  for  additional  information  regarding  business  combinations.
Certain costs related to our investment in PS Fund 1 were recorded in Gain on investments, net. See note 23 for
additional information relating to these  costs.

Acquisition-Related Contingent Consideration

In 2014, we recognized an acquisition-related contingent consideration gain of $14.1 million. The net gain
was  primarily  driven  by  net  fair  value  adjustments  of  $19.0  million  related  to  the  Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4)
agreement  entered  into  with  Meda  Pharma  SARL  (‘‘Meda’’)  in  June  2011  (the  ‘‘Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4)
agreement’’), as a result of continued assessment of the impact from generic competition on performance trends
and future revenue forecasts for Zovirax(cid:4).

In 2013, we recognized an acquisition-related contingent consideration gain of $29.2 million. The net gain
was primarily driven by a net gain related to the Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4) agreement. As a result of analysis in
the third quarter of 2013 of performance trends since the launch of a generic Zovirax(cid:4) ointment in April 2013,
we adjusted the projected revenue forecast, resulting in an acquisition-related contingent consideration net gain
of  $20.0  million  in  2013.  Also  contributing  to  the  acquisition-related  contingent  net  gain  was  a  net  gain  of
$6.9  million,  which  resulted  from  the  termination,  in  the  third  quarter  of  2013,  of  the  A007  (Lacrisert(cid:4))
development  program,  which  impacted  the  probability  associated  with  potential  milestone  payments.  Refer  to
note 6 to the 2014 Financial Statements  for further information.

In 2012, we recognized an acquisition-related contingent consideration gain of $5.3 million, primarily driven
by  (i)  a  net  gain  of  $10.3  million  related  to  the  iNova  acquisition  in  December  2011  due  to  changes  in  the
estimated probability of achieving the related milestones, partially offset by (ii) a net loss of $6.5 million related
to the Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4) agreement, due to fair value adjustments to reflect accretion for the time value
of money, partially offset by changes  in  the projected revenue forecast.

Other  (Income) Expense

Other (income) expense primarily includes: legal settlements and related fees and gains/losses from the sale

of assets and businesses.

In 2014, we recognized other income of $268.7 million, primarily related to (i) a net gain of $323.9 million
related to the divestiture of facial aesthetic fillers and toxins in the third quarter of 2014 and (ii) the reversal of a
$50.0 million reserve related to the AntiGrippin(cid:4) litigation in the first quarter of 2014, partially offset by (iii) a
net  loss  of  $58.5  million  related  to  the  divestiture  of  Metronidazole  1.3%  in  the  third  quarter  of  2014,  (iv)  a
post-combination expense of $20.4 million in the third quarter of 2014 related to the acceleration of unvested
stock  options  for  PreCision  employees,  and  (v)  a  loss  on  sale  of  $8.8  million  related  to  the  divestiture  of  the
generic  tretinoin  product  rights  in  the  third  quarter  of  2014,  acquired  in  the  PreCision  acquisition.  Refer  to
note 4, note 20 and note 3 to the 2014 Financial Statements for further details related to the divestitures of facial
aesthetic  fillers  and  toxins  and  Metronidazole  1.3%,  the  AntiGrippin(cid:4)  litigation  and  the  acquisition  of
PreCision, respectively.

In 2013, we recognized other expense of $287.2 million, primarily due to (i) a charge of $142.5 million in the
third  quarter  of  2013  related  to  a  settlement  agreement  with  Anacor  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  (‘‘Anacor’’),  (ii)  a
post-combination expense of $52.8 million, in the aggregate, related to B&L’s previously cancelled performance-
based  options  and  the  acceleration  of  unvested  stock  options  for  B&L  employees  as  a  result  of  the  B&L
Acquisition, (iii) a charge of $50.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2013 related to AntiGrippin(cid:4) litigation, and
(iv) a loss of $10.2 million related to the sale of certain skincare products sold primarily in Australia in the fourth
quarter of 2013. Refer to note 4, note 3, and note 20 to the 2014 Financial Statements for further details related
to  the  divestiture  of  certain  skincare  products  sold  in  Australia,  the  B&L  Acquisition,  and  the  AntiGrippin(cid:4)
litigation, respectively.

47

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

In  2012,  we  recorded  other  expense  of  $136.6  million,  primarily  due  to  (i)  a  post-combination  expense  of
$77.3  million,  related  to  the  acceleration  of  unvested  stock  options,  restricted  stock  awards,  and  share
appreciation rights for Medicis employees that was triggered by the change in control and (ii) legal settlement
charges of $56.8 million, mainly related to a settlement of antitrust litigation and the associated legal fees. Refer
to note 3 to the 2014 Financial Statements for further details.

Non-Operating Income (Expense)

The following table displays each non-operating income or expense category for each of the last three years,

and the dollar and percentage changes  in  the dollar  amount of each category.

($ in millions;  Income (Expense))

Years Ended December 31,

2014

$

2013

$

2012

$

Change

2013 to 2014

2012 to  2013

$

%

$

%

Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on investments, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.0
(971.0)
(129.6)
(144.1)
292.6

8.0
(844.3)
(65.0)
(9.4)
5.8

6.0
(481.6)
(20.1)
19.7
2.1

(38)
15
99

2.0
(362.7)
(44.9)

33
(3.0)
75
(126.7)
(64.6)
223
(134.7) NM (29.1) NM
176
286.8 NM

3.7

Total non-operating expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(947.1)

(904.9)

(473.9)

(42.2)

5

(431.0)

91

NM — Not meaningful

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $126.7 million, or 15%, to $971.0 million in 2014, primarily due to an increase of
(i)  $170.3  million  related  to  higher  debt  balances,  driven  by  the  borrowings  in  the  third  quarter  of  2013  in
conjunction with the B&L Acquisition, (ii) $46.5 million related to the issuance of 5.625% senior notes due 2021
in  December  2013,  partially  offset  by  (iii)  a  decrease  of  $65.6  million,  in  the  aggregate,  related  to  the  early
redemption of 6.50% senior notes due 2016 (the ‘‘2016 Notes’’) in December 2013 and 6.75% senior notes due
2017 (the ‘‘2017 Notes’’) in October 2014, and (iv) a decrease of $19.5 million, in the aggregate, related to the
non-cash amortization and write-off of  debt discounts and  debt  issuance  costs.

Interest expense increased $362.7 million, or 75%, to $844.3 million in 2013, primarily due to (i) an increase
of $308.1 million primarily related to higher debt balances, driven by the new borrowings during the period and
(ii)  an  increase  of  $53.1  million,  in  the  aggregate,  related  to  the  non-cash  amortization  of  debt  discounts  and
deferred  financing  costs,  including  the  write-off  of  deferred  financing  costs  related  to  the  commitment  letter
entered into in connection with the financing of the B&L Acquisition.

Refer to note 12 to the 2014 Financial Statements  for further details.

Loss on  Extinguishment of Debt

In  2014,  we  recognized  losses  of  $129.6  million,  primarily  related  to  (i)  the  refinancing  of  our  Series  E
tranche  B  term  loan  facility  on  February  6,  2014,  (ii)  the  redemption  of  the  2017  Notes  in  October  2014,  and
(iii) the redemption of 6.875% senior notes due 2018 (the ‘‘December 2018 Notes’’) in December 2014. Refer to
note 12 to the 2014 Financial Statements  for further details.

In 2013, we recognized losses of $65.0 million, related primarily due to (i) the redemption of the 2016 Notes
in  December  2013,  (ii)  the  repricing  of  our  Series  D  tranche  B  term  loan  facility  and  our  Series  C  of  the
tranche B term loan facility on February 21, 2013, and (iii) the redemption of 9.875% senior notes assumed in
connection with the B&L Acquisition in the third quarter of 2013 (see note 3 to the 2014 Financial Statements
for additional information). Refer to  note  12 to the 2014  Financial Statements  for further details.

48

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

In  2012,  we  recognized  losses  of  $20.1  million,  mainly  on  refinancing  of  our  term  loan  B  facility  on

October 2, 2012 and the settlement of  convertible notes.

Foreign Exchange and Other

In  2014,  we  recognized  foreign  exchange  losses  of  $144.1  million,  primarily  due  to  (i)  a  foreign  exchange
loss on a euro-denominated intercompany loan and (ii) translation losses from intercompany transactions within
our  European operations.

Foreign exchange and other loss was $9.4 million in 2013, compared with a gain of $19.7 million  in 2012,
reflecting  a  decrease  of  $29.1  million,  primarily  due  to  (i)  the  $29.4  million  gain  realized  in  2012  on  an
intercompany loan that was not designated as permanent in nature that did not similarly occur in 2013, (ii) an
unrealized foreign exchange loss of $8.3 million on an intercompany financing arrangement in the first quarter
of 2013, partially offset by (iii) the translation  gains on intercompany loans in  2013.

Gain on Investments, Net

In  2014,  we  recognized  a  gain  on  investment,  net  of  $292.6  million.  The  gain  on  investment,  net  was
primarily  driven  by  a  net  gain  of  $286.7  million  recognized  in  connection  with  the  sale  by  PS  Fund  1  of  the
Allergan shares. Refer to note 23 to the 2014 Financial  Statements  for additional information.

In 2013, we recognized gain on investment, net of $5.8 million. The gain on investment, net was primarily
driven  by  a  realized  gain  of  $4.0  million  on  the  sale  of  an  equity  investment  acquired  as  part  of  the  Medicis
acquisition in December 2012.

Income Taxes

The  following  table  displays  the  dollar  amount  of  the  current  and  deferred  provisions  for  (recovery  of)
income taxes for each of the last three years, and the dollar and percentage changes in the dollar amount of each
provision. Percentages may not sum due  to  rounding.

($ in millions;  Expense (Income))

Years Ended December 31,

Change

2014

2013

2012

2013 to  2014

2012 to  2013

$

$

$

$

%

$

%

Current income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income  tax expense (benefit)

150.7
29.7

83.4
(534.2)

63.5

31
(341.7) 563.9 NM (192.5) 56

67.3

19.9

81

Total provision for (recovery of) income taxes

. . . . . . . . . .

180.4

(450.8)

(278.2) 631.2 NM (172.6) 62

NM — Not meaningful

In 2014, our effective tax rate was different from our statutory Canadian tax rate due to (i) income earned
in jurisdictions with a lower statutory rate than in Canada, (ii) tax expense of $82.1 million associated with the
divestiture of facial aesthetic fillers and toxins to Galderma S.A. (‘‘Galderma’’) in July 2014, which is reflected as
a component of tax expense on taxable foreign income set forth in the effective tax rate reconciliation in the tax
footnote, and (iii) a $147.3 million tax benefit related to intra-entity integration efforts of which $129.2 million
relates to current year items including the creation of deferred tax assets as a result of a liquidation of one of our
foreign affiliates, a reduction of deferred tax liabilities, and the amortization of intangibles for tax purposes in
jurisdictions with tax rates lower than Canada. Our consolidated foreign rate differential reflects the net total of
the tax cost or benefit of income earned or losses incurred in jurisdictions outside of Canada as compared to the
net total tax cost or benefit of such income (on a jurisdictional basis) at the Canadian statutory rate. Tax costs
below the Canadian statutory rate generate a beneficial foreign rate differential as do tax benefits generated in
jurisdictions where the statutory tax rate exceeds the Canadian statutory tax rate. It is not expected that the net

49

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

total  of  the  foreign  rate  differentials  generated  in  each  jurisdiction  in  which  we  operate  will  bear  a  direct
relationship to the net total amount of  foreign  income (or loss) earned  outside of Canada.

We  record  a  valuation  allowance  against  our  deferred  tax  assets  to  reduce  the  net  carrying  value  to  an
amount  that  we  believe  is  more  likely  than  not  to  be  realized.  When  we  establish  or  reduce  the  valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets, the provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively,
in the period such determination is made. The majority of the increase in 2014 is due to changes in the deferred
tax asset balance in Canada, the maintenance of the valuation allowance on foreign tax credits recorded in the
U.S. and the establishment of a valuation allowance on certain previously recorded U.S. State deferred tax assets
due to our internal restructuring, the effect of which is deferred under U.S. GAAP. In determining the amount
of  the  valuation  allowance  that  was  necessary,  we  considered  the  amount  of  U.S.  tax  loss  carryforwards,
Canadian  tax  loss  carryforwards,  scientific  research  and  experimental  development  pool,  and  investment  tax
credits  that  we  would  more  likely  than  not  be  able  to  utilize  based  on  future  sources  of  income.  Our  taxes
payable is impacted by our ability to  use net operating losses on a current basis.

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS  (UNAUDITED)

The following table presents a summary of our unaudited quarterly results of operations and operating cash

flows in 2014 and 2013:

($ in millions)

2014

Q1

$

Q2

$

Q3

$

Q4

$

Q1

$

2013

Q2

$

Q3

$

Q4

$

Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,886.2 2,041.1 2,056.2 2,280.0 1,068.4 1,095.7 1,541.7 2,063.8
Expenses(1)
954.2 2,433.2 1,840.3

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,529.6 1,686.0 1,372.3 1,635.9

951.4

Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

356.6

355.1

683.9

644.1

117.0

141.5 (891.5) 223.5

Net (loss) income attributable to Valeant
Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

. . . . . .

(22.6) 125.8

275.4

534.9

(27.5)

10.8 (973.2) 123.8

(Loss) earnings  per share attributable to

Valeant Pharmaceuticals International,  Inc.:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(0.07)

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(0.07)

0.38

0.37

0.82

0.81

1.59

1.56

(0.09)

(0.09)

0.04

0.03

(2.92)

(2.92)

0.37

0.36

Net cash provided by operating activities . . .

484.3

376.0

618.7

815.7

255.3

305.1

201.7

279.9

(1)

In the third quarter of 2013, we recognized an impairment charge of $551.6 million related to ezogabine/retigabine (immediate-release
formulation) which is co-developed and marketed under a collaboration agreement with GSK. In addition, in the third quarter of 2013,
we wrote off an IPR&D asset of $93.8 million relating to a modified-release formulation of ezogabine/retigabine. See note 6 to the
2014 Financial Statements for additional information regarding these charges.

Fourth Quarter of 2014 Compared to  Fourth Quarter of 2013

Results of Operations

Total revenues increased $216.2 million, or 10%, to $2.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014. The growth in
the fourth quarter of 2014 reflected both price and volume, with slightly more than half of the growth from price.
The growth also reflected the following  factors:

(cid:127) the  incremental  product  sales  revenue  of  $95.6  million,  in  the  aggregate,  from  all  2014  acquisitions
primarily  from  Solta  Medical  (mainly  driven  by  Thermage  CPT(cid:4)  system  product  sales)  and  PreCision
(mainly driven by Clindagel(cid:4) product  sales); and

50

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(cid:127) an increase in other revenues of $12.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2014, primarily related to higher

royalty revenue.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) a negative foreign currency impact on the existing business of $107.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2014
due to the impact of a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against certain currencies, including the Russian
ruble  and Euro; and

(cid:127) a negative impact from divestitures and discontinuations of $96.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2014,
primarily driven by the divestitures of facial aesthetic  fillers and  toxins in the third quarter of 2014.

Excluding the items described above, we realized incremental product sales revenue from the remainder of
the existing business of $312.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2014. The growth reflected (1) higher sales of
(i)  Jublia(cid:4)  and  (ii)  Targretin(cid:4),  and  (iii)  orphan  products  (Syprine(cid:4)  and  Xenazine(cid:4))  and  (2)  higher  sales
from  recent  product  launches,  including  the  launches  of  RAM  0.08%  and  Luzu(cid:4),  partially  offset  by  a
decrease in product sales of $26.5 million, in the aggregate, due to generic competition. The decrease from
generic competition related to a decline  in sales  of the Vanos(cid:4) franchise and Wellbutrin(cid:4) XL (Canada).

Net income attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. increased $411.1 million, or 332%,
to  $534.9  million  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2014,  reflecting  the  following  factors:  (i)  an  increase  in  contribution
(product  sales  revenue  less  cost  of  goods  sold,  exclusive  of  amortization  and  impairments  of  finite-lived
intangible  assets)  of  $344.7  million,  primarily  from  the  product  sales  from  the  existing  business  and  all  2014
acquisitions, (ii) a decrease in non-operating expenses driven largely by a net gain of $286.7 million recognized
in  connection  with  the  sale  by  PS  Fund  1  of  Allergan  shares,  as  further  described  above  under  ‘‘Results  of
Operations — Non-Operating Income (Expenses)’’, partially offset by (iii) an increase in provision for income
taxes, as further described above under  ‘‘Results of  Operations — Income Taxes’’.

Cash Flows From Operations

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $535.8 million, to $815.7 million in the fourth quarter of

2014, primarily due to:

(cid:127) the inclusion of cash flows from the operations in the fourth quarter of 2014 from the 2014 acquisitions,

primarily the PreCision and Solta Medical  acquisitions;

(cid:127) $397.5  million  of  cash  proceeds  representing  the  return  on  our  investment  in  PS  Fund  1  from  the
appreciation  in  the  Allergan  share  price  and  our  right  to  15%  of  the  net  profits  realized  by  Pershing
Square on the sale of Allergan shares. Refer to note 23 to the 2014 Financial Statements for additional
information;

(cid:127) lower payments of $92.3 million related to restructuring, integration and other costs in the fourth quarter

of 2014; and

(cid:127) incremental  cash  flows  from  the  continued  growth  of  the  existing  business,  including  new  product
launches,  partially  offset  by  a  decrease  in  contribution  of  $25.5  million  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2014
related  to  the  lower  sales  of  the  Vanos(cid:4)  franchise  and  Wellbutrin(cid:4)  XL  (Canada)  as  a  result  of  generic
competition.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) an  increase  in  investment  in  working  capital  of  $143.4  million  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2014,  primarily
related to (i) an increase in receivables driven by higher gross sales and product mix and (ii) the impact of
changes  related  to  timing  of  payments,  including  prepaid  expenses,  interest,  severance,  and  integration
payments,  and  receipts  in  the  ordinary  course  of  business,  partially  offset  by  an  increase  in  accrued
liabilities due to higher gross to net sales reserves.

51

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND  CAPITAL RESOURCES

Selected Measures of Financial Condition

The following table presents a summary of  our financial condition as of  December 31,  2014 and  2013:

($ in millions;  Asset (Liability))

As of December 31,

2014

$

2013

$

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-lived assets(1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total debt, including current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

322.6
21,912.8
(15,254.6)

600.3
23,834.5
(17,367.7)

(1) Long-lived assets comprise property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill.

Change

$

(277.7)
(1,921.7)
2,113.1

%

(46)
(8)
(12)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash  and  cash  equivalents  decreased  $277.7  million,  or  46%,  to  $322.6  million  as  of  December  31,  2014,

which  primarily reflected the following uses  of cash:

(cid:127) $1.3 billion in net repayments, in the  aggregate, under  our senior secured credit facilities in 2014;

(cid:127) $1.3 billion paid, in the aggregate, in connection with the purchases of businesses and intangible assets,

mainly in respect of the PreCision and Solta Medical acquisitions in 2014;

(cid:127) $500.0 million paid in connection with  the redemption of the 2017 Notes  in October  2014;

(cid:127) $445.0 million paid in connection with the redemption of the December 2018 Notes in December 2014;

(cid:127) purchases of property, plant and equipment of $291.6 million;

(cid:127) contingent  consideration  payments  within  financing  activities  of  $106.1  million  primarily  related  to  the
OraPharma  and  Eisai  (Targretin(cid:4))  acquisitions  and  the  Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4)  agreement  entered
into in June 2011;

(cid:127) $55.2 million related to debt financing costs paid primarily due to (i) a call premiums paid in connection
with  the  redemption  of  the  2017  Notes  and  the  December  2018  Notes  and  (ii)  the  refinancing  of  our
Series E tranche B term loan facility in February 2014. Refer to note 12 to the 2014 Financial Statements
for additional information regarding the call premiums paid with the redemption of the 2017 Notes and
December 2018 Notes; and

(cid:127) $44.1 million of employee withholding taxes paid in connection with the exercise of share-based awards.

Those factors were partially offset by the following sources  of  cash:

(cid:127) $2.3 billion in operating cash flows, including $397.5 million of cash proceeds representing the return on
our investment in PS Fund 1 from the appreciation in the Allergan share price and our right to 15% of
the net profits realized by Pershing Square on the sale of Allergan shares. Refer to note 23 to the 2014
Financial Statements for additional information;  and

(cid:127) $1.5 billion of net cash proceeds from divestitures primarily related to the divestitures of facial aesthetic
fillers  and  toxins  in  July  2014.  Refer  to  note  4  to  the  2014  Financial  Statements  for  additional
information.

52

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets decreased $1.9 billion, or 8%, to $21.9 billion as of December 31, 2014, primarily due to:

(cid:127) the depreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible assets of $1.7 billion, in

the aggregate;

(cid:127) a reduction of the carrying amount of intangible assets and goodwill of $1.0 billion and $91.0 million, in
the  aggregate,  related  to  the  divestitures  of  (i)  facial  aesthetic  fillers  and  toxins  and  (ii)  Metronidazole
1.3%,  respectively,  which  were  each  divested  in  July  2014.  Refer  to  note  4  to  the  2014  Financial
Statements for additional information; and

(cid:127) a negative foreign currency exchange  impact of $776.9 million.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) the inclusion of the identifiable intangible assets, goodwill and property, plant and equipment from the
2014 acquisitions of $1.2 billion, in the aggregate, primarily related to the PreCision and Solta Medical
acquisitions; and

(cid:127) purchases of property, plant and equipment of $291.6 million.

Long-Term Debt

Long-term  debt  (including  the  current  portion)  decreased  $2.1  billion,  or  12%,  to  $15.3  billion  as  of
December  31,  2014,  primarily  due  to  (i)  $1.3  billion  in  net  repayments,  in  the  aggregate,  under  our  senior
secured  credit  facilities  in  2014,  (ii)  the  redemption  of  $500.0  million  aggregate  principal  amount  of  the  2017
Notes in October 2014, and (iii) the redemption of $445.0 million aggregate principal amount of the December
2018 Notes in December 2014. Refer  to  note 12 to the  2014 Financial Statements for additional  information.

Cash Flows

Our  primary  sources  of  cash  include:  cash  collected  from  customers,  funds  available  from  our  revolving
credit  facility,  issuances  of  long-term  debt  and  issuances  of  equity.  Our  primary  uses  of  cash  include:  business
development  transactions,  funding  ongoing  operations,  interest  and  principal  payments,  securities  repurchases
and restructuring activities. The following table displays cash flow information for each of the last three years:

($ in millions)

Years Ended December 31,

Change

2014

$

2013

$

2012

2013 to 2014

2012  to  2013

$

$

%

$

%

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) provided by financing  activities . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,443.7) 4,027.7
(5.2)
Effect  of  exchange rate changes on cash  and  cash  equivalents . . . .

2,294.7

(29.0)

1,042.0

1,252.7
(99.7) (5,380.3) (2,965.7) 5,280.6

656.6

3,057.3 (6,471.4) NM
(23.8) 458

3.8

385.4
120
(98) (2,414.6)
970.4

59
81
32
(9.0) NM

Net (decrease)  increase  in  cash and cash  equivalents . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning  of  year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(277.7)
600.3

(315.8)
916.1

Cash and cash equivalents, end  of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

322.6

600.3

752.0
164.1

916.1

38.1
(315.8)

(12) (1,067.8) NM
458
752.0
(34)

(277.7)

(46)

(315.8)

(34)

NM — Not meaningful

53

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $1.3 billion, or 120%, to $2.3 billion in 2014, primarily

due to:

(cid:127) the inclusion of cash flows in 2014 from all 2013 acquisitions, primarily the B&L and Obagi acquisitions,

as well as all 2014 acquisitions;

(cid:127) $397.5  million  of  cash  proceeds  representing  the  return  on  our  investment  in  PS  Fund  1  from  the
appreciation  in  the  Allergan  share  price  and  our  right  to  15%  of  the  net  profits  realized  by  Pershing
Square on the sale of Allergan shares. Refer to note 23 to the 2014 Financial Statements for additional
information; and

(cid:127) incremental  cash  flows  from  the  continued  growth  of  the  existing  business,  including  new  product
launches, partially offset by a decrease in contribution of $160.2 million in 2014 related to the lower sales
of  the  Vanos(cid:4),  Retin-A  Micro(cid:4)  (excluding  RAM  0.08%),  and  Zovirax(cid:4)  franchises  and  Wellbutrin(cid:4)  XL
(Canada) as a result of generic competition.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) an increased investment in working capital of $290.1 million in 2014, primarily related to (i) an increase in
receivables driven by higher gross sales and product mix and (ii) the impact of changes related to timing
of  payments,  including  prepaid  expenses,  interest,  severance,  and  integration  payments,  and  receipts  in
the ordinary course of business, partially offset by an increase in accrued liabilities due to higher gross to
net sales reserves; and

(cid:127) higher payments of $55.6 million related to restructuring, integration and other costs  in 2014.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $385.4 million, or 59%, to $1.0 billion in 2013, primarily

due to:

(cid:127) the  inclusion  of  cash  flows  in  2013  from  all  2012  acquisitions,  primarily  the  Medicis,  OraPharma,  and
Gerot Lannach acquisitions, as well as all 2013 acquisitions, primarily the B&L, Natur Produkt and Obagi
acquisitions; and

(cid:127) incremental cash flows from continued  growth in  the existing business.

Those factors were partially offset by:
(cid:127) a decrease in contribution of $286.7 million in 2013, primarily related to the lower sales of the Zovirax(cid:4)

franchise, Retin-A Micro(cid:4), BenzaClin(cid:4) and Cesamet(cid:4) as a result of generic competition;

(cid:127) higher payments of $140.7 million related to restructuring, integration and other costs in 2013, primarily

driven by the B&L Acquisition;

(cid:127) an  increase  in  payments  of  legal  settlements  and  related  fees  of  $139.0  million  mainly  related  to  a

settlement agreement with Anacor in  2013;

(cid:127) an increased investment in working capital of $125.0 million in 2013, primarily related to (i) the impact of
the  changes  related  to  timing  of  payments  in  the  ordinary  course  of  business  and  (ii)  an  increase  in
accounts  receivable,  reflecting  the  growth  of  the  business  as  well  as  the  unfavorable  impact  from  mix
between geographies and businesses;  and

(cid:127) the receipt of the $45.0 million milestone payment from GSK in connection with the launch of Potiga(cid:4) in

2012 that did not similarly occur in 2013.

54

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Investing Activities

Net  cash  used  in  investing  activities  decreased  $5.3  billion,  or  98%,  to  $99.7  million  in  2014,  primarily

due to:

(cid:127) a decrease of $4.0 billion, in the aggregate, related to lower purchases of businesses (net of cash acquired)

and intangible assets in 2014, driven  mainly by the  August 2013 B&L Acquisition;  and

(cid:127) a decrease of $1.5 billion, related to higher proceeds from the sale of assets and businesses, net of costs to
sell, primarily attributable to the cash proceeds of approximately $1.4 billion for the divestiture of facial
aesthetic fillers and toxins to Galderma in  the third quarter of 2014.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) an increase of $176.3 million related to higher purchases of property, plant and equipment.

Net cash used in investing activities increased $2.4 billion, or 81%, to $5.4 billion in 2013, primarily due to:

(cid:127) an increase of $1.8 billion, in the aggregate, related to the purchases of businesses (net of cash acquired)

and intangible assets, in the aggregate;

(cid:127) an  increase  of  $607.8  million,  mainly  related  to  the  higher  proceeds  received  in  2012  from  the  sale  of

marketable securities acquired as part  of  the Medicis acquisition; and

(cid:127) an increase of $50.9 million, related to lower proceeds from sales of assets, primarily attributable to the
cash proceeds of $66.3 million for the sale of the IDP-111 and 5-FU products in the first quarter of 2012,
partially offset by the proceeds related  to  the sale  of Buphenyl(cid:4) in the second quarter of 2013.

Financing Activities

Net  cash  used  in  financing  activities  was  $2.4  billion  in  2014,  compared  with  the  net  cash  provided  by

financing activities of $4.0 billion in 2013, reflecting  a decrease  of  $6.5 billion, primarily due to:

(cid:127) a  decrease  of  $4.7  billion,  in  the  aggregate,  related  to  net  proceeds  from  our  senior  secured  credit
facilities primarily due to (i) the borrowings of $3.9 billion in the third quarter of 2013 in connection with
the B&L Acquisition and (ii) the repayments of $1.0 billion, in the aggregate, in the third quarter of 2014,
partially offset by (iii) the issuance of $225.6 million in incremental term loans in the first quarter of 2014.
Refer to note 12 to the 2014 Financial Statements  for additional information;

(cid:127) a decrease related to net proceeds of  $4.1 billion from the  issuance  of senior  notes in  2013; and

(cid:127) a decrease of $2.3 billion related to the net proceeds from the issuance of common stock in June 2013,

which  were utilized to fund the B&L  Acquisition.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) an  increase  of  $4.2  billion  related  to  the  repayment  of  long-term  debt  assumed  in  connection  with  the

B&L Acquisition in 2013 that did not similarly occur in  2014;

(cid:127) an increase of $233.6 million related to the repayments of long-term debt assumed in connection with the

Medicis acquisition in 2013 that did not  similarly occur in 2014;

(cid:127) an  increase  of  $61.1  million  related  to  the  lower  debt  financing  costs  paid  in  2014  due  to  the  lower

refinancing activities in 2014;

(cid:127) an increase of $55.6 million related to the repurchases of common shares in 2013 that did not similarly

occur in 2014; and

55

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(cid:127) an increase of $37.6 million related to the repayments of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, in
the  aggregate,  assumed  in  connection  with  the  Natur  Produkt  acquisition  in  2013  that  did  not  similarly
occur in 2014.

Net cash provided by financing activities increased $970.4 million, or 32%, to $4.0 billion in 2013, primarily

due to:

(cid:127) an increase related to net proceeds  of $4.1  billion from the  issuance  of senior  notes in  2013;

(cid:127) the  net  proceeds  of  $2.3  billion  primarily  related  to  the  issuance  of  common  stock  in  June  2013,  which

were utilized to fund the B&L Acquisition;

(cid:127) an  increase  of  $1.4  billion  of  net  borrowings  under  senior  secured  credit  facilities,  in  the  aggregate,  in

2013;

(cid:127) an increase of $606.3 million related to cash settlement of convertible debt in 2012 that did not similarly

occur in 2013; and

(cid:127) an increase of $225.1 million related to lower repurchases of common shares in 2013.

Those factors were partially offset by:

(cid:127) a  decrease  of  $4.2  billion  related  to  the  repayment  of  long-term  debt  assumed  in  connection  with  the

B&L Acquisition in August 2013;

(cid:127) a decrease related to net proceeds of  $2.2 billion from the  issuance  of senior  notes in  2012;

(cid:127) $915.5 million paid in connection with  the redemption of the 2016 Notes  in December  2013;

(cid:127) $233.6  million  related  to  the  repayment  of  long-term  debt  assumed  in  connection  with  the  Medicis

acquisition in December 2012;

(cid:127) a  decrease  of  $83.1  million  related  to  the  higher  debt  financing  costs  paid  (including  call  premium  of
$29.8 million paid in connection with the redemption of the 2016 Notes in December 2013), primarily due
to the issuance of senior notes and the Series E tranche B term  loans in  2013, in the  aggregate;

(cid:127) $37.6 million in repayments of short-term borrowings and long-term debt, in the aggregate, assumed in

connection with the Natur Produkt acquisition;  and

(cid:127) a decrease due to higher contingent consideration payments of $26.1 million, in 2013, primarily due to a
payment of $40.0 million and $20.1 million, related to the OraPharma and Gerot Lannach acquisitions,
respectively,  partially  offset  by  (i) 
lower  contingent  consideration  payments  related  to  the
Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4)  agreement  entered  into  with  Meda  in  June  2011  and  (ii)  a  contingent
consideration  payment  in  the  second  quarter  of  2012  related  to  the  PharmaSwiss  S.A.  acquisition  in
March 2011.

Debt

See  note  12  and  note  24  of  notes  to  consolidated  financial  statements  in  Item  15  of  this  Form  10-K  for

detailed information regarding our long-term debt.

The senior notes issued by us are our senior unsecured obligations and are jointly and severally guaranteed
on  a  senior  unsecured  basis  by  each  of  our  subsidiaries  that  is  a  guarantor  under  our  senior  secured  credit
facilities. The senior notes issued by our subsidiary Valeant are senior unsecured obligations of Valeant and are
jointly  and  severally  guaranteed  on  a  senior  unsecured  basis  by  us  and  each  of  our  subsidiaries  (other  than
Valeant) that is a guarantor under our senior secured credit facilities. Certain of the future subsidiaries of the
Company and Valeant may be required to guarantee the senior notes. The non-guarantor subsidiaries had total
assets of $6.5 billion and total liabilities of $3.2 billion as of December 31, 2014, and net revenues of $2.0 billion
and net earnings from operations of $435.9  million for the year ended December 31,  2014.

56

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Our  primary  sources  of  liquidity  are  our  cash,  cash  collected  from  customers,  funds  available  from  our
revolving  credit  facility,  issuances  of  long-term  debt  and  issuances  of  equity.  We  believe  these  sources  will  be
sufficient to meet our current liquidity needs. We have commitments approximating $70 million for expenditures
related  to  property,  plant  and  equipment.  Since  part  of  our  business  strategy  is  to  expand  through  strategic
acquisitions,  we  may  be  required  to  seek  additional  debt  financing,  issue  additional  equity  securities  or  sell
assets, as necessary, to finance future acquisitions, including the additional debt financing that will be required in
connection  with  the  proposed  acquisition  of  Salix  Pharmaceuticals,  Ltd.  (‘‘Salix’’)  (see  note  24  to  the  2014
Financial  Statements  for  information  regarding  our  proposed  acquisition  of  Salix),  or  for  other  general
corporate  purposes.  Our  current  corporate  credit  rating  is  Ba3  for  Moody’s  Investors  Service  and  BB(cid:6)  for
Standard and Poor’s. A downgrade may increase our cost of borrowing and may negatively impact our ability to
raise additional debt capital. An inability to obtain certain amendments to our Credit Agreement in connection
with the proposed acquisition of Salix  may  increase our  cost of borrowing.

As of December 31, 2014, we were in compliance with all of our covenants related to our outstanding debt.
As of December 31, 2014, our short-term portion of long-term debt amounted to $0.9 million, in the aggregate.
We believe our existing cash and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to cover our short-term debt
maturities as they become due.

Securities Repurchase Programs

See  note  14  of  notes  to  consolidated  financial  statements  in  Item  15  of  this  Form  10-K  for  detailed

information regarding our various securities  repurchase programs.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL  OBLIGATIONS

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have a material current effect or that are reasonably likely
to have a material future effect on our results of operations, financial condition, capital expenditures, liquidity,
or capital resources.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of  December 31, 2014:

($ in millions)

Total

$

Long-term debt obligations, including interest(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related consideration(2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease obligations
Purchase obligations(3)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20,266.8
50.0
195.7
327.3

Payments Due by Period

2015

$

817.8
40.0
44.2
257.3

2016 and
2017

2018 and
2019

Thereafter

$

$

$

2,715.3
10.0
64.5
54.8

6,672.0
—
33.7
13.1

10,061.7
—

53.3
2.1

Total contractual obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20,839.8

1,159.3

2,844.6

6,718.8

10,117.1

(1) Expected  interest payments assume repayment of the principal amount of the debt obligations at maturity.

(2) Reflects  the  minimum  guaranteed  obligations  related  to  the  Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4)  agreement.  These  amounts  do  not  include
contingent  obligations  related  to  potential  royalty  payments  in  excess  of  the  minimum  guaranteed  obligations  related  to  the
Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4) agreement. Such contingent obligations are recorded at fair value in our consolidated financial statements.

(3)

Purchase  obligations  consist  of  agreements  to  purchase  goods  and  services  that  are  enforceable  and  legally  binding  and  include
obligations for minimum inventory and capital expenditures, and outsourced information technology, product promotion and clinical
research  services.

The above table does not reflect (i) contingent payments related to contingent milestone payments to third
parties  as  part  of  certain  development,  collaboration  and  license  agreements  and  (ii)  acquisition-related
contingent consideration. See note 21 of notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 15 of this Form 10-K
for additional information related to  these  contingent payments.

57

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Also  excluded  from  the  above  table  is  a  liability  for  uncertain  tax  positions  totaling  $109.4  million.  This
liability  has  been  excluded  because  we  cannot  currently  make  a  reliable  estimate  of  the  period  in  which  the
liability will be payable, if ever.

On  January  30,  2015,  we  issued  $1.0  billion  aggregate  principal  amount  of  5.50%  senior  unsecured  notes
due  2023  (the  ‘‘2023  Notes’’).  The  net  proceeds  of  the  2023  Notes  offering  were  used  to  (i)  redeem  all  of  the
remaining  December  2018  Notes  on  February  17,  2015,  (ii)  repay  amounts  drawn  under  our  revolving  credit
facility,  and  (iii)  for  general  corporate  purposes.  In  addition,  on  January  22,  2015,  we  entered  into  joinder
agreements  to  allow  for  an  increase  in  commitments  under  our  revolving  credit  facility  to  $1.5  billion  and  the
issuance  of  $250.0  million  in  incremental  term  loans  under  the  Series  A-3  Tranche  A  Term  Loan  Facility.  See
note 24 of notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 15 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

Our common shares are listed on the TSX  and the  NYSE under  the ticker  symbol ‘‘VRX’’.

At  February  18,  2015,  we  had  336,202,718  issued  and  outstanding  common  shares.  In  addition,  as  of
February 18, 2015, we had 7,625,003 stock options and 806,873 time-based RSUs that each represent the right of
a  holder  to  receive  one  of  the  Company’s  common  shares,  and  1,597,351  performance-based  RSUs  that
represent the right of a holder to receive up to 400% of the RSUs granted. A maximum of 5,265,558 common
shares could be issued upon vesting of  the  performance-based RSUs outstanding.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE  DISCLOSURES ABOUT  MARKET RISK

Our  business  and  financial  results  are  affected  by  fluctuations  in  world  financial  markets,  including  the
impacts of foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate movements. We evaluate our exposure to such risks
on  an  ongoing  basis,  and  seek  ways  to  manage  these  risks  to  an  acceptable  level,  based  on  management’s
judgment  of  the  appropriate  trade-off  between  risk,  opportunity  and  cost.  We  may  use  derivative  financial
instruments from time to time as a risk management tool and not for trading or speculative purposes. Currently,
we do not hold any market risk sensitive instruments whose value is  subject to market price risk.

Inflation; Seasonality

We are subject to price control restriction on our pharmaceutical products in the majority of countries in
which we now operate. As a result, our ability to raise prices in a timely fashion in anticipation of inflation may
be limited in some markets.

Historically, revenues from our business tend to be weighted toward the second half of the year. Sales in the
fourth  quarter  tend  to  be  higher  based  on  consumer  and  customer  purchasing  patterns  associated  with
healthcare  reimbursement  programs.  Further,  the  third  quarter  ‘‘back  to  school’’  period  impacts  demand  for
certain of our dermatology products. However, as we continue our strategy of selective acquisitions to expand
our  product portfolio, there are no assurances  that these  historical trends will continue in  the future.

Foreign Currency Risk

In 2014, a majority of our revenue and expense activities and capital expenditures were denominated in U.S.
dollars. We have exposure to multiple foreign currencies, including, among others, the Euro, Canadian dollar,
Russian ruble, Japanese yen, and Australian dollar. Our operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting
business  abroad,  including  price  and  currency  exchange  controls  and  fluctuations  in  the  relative  values  of
currencies.  In  addition,  to  the  extent  that  we  require,  as  a  source  of  debt  repayment,  earnings  and  cash  flows
from some of our operations located in foreign countries, we are subject to risk of changes in the value of the
U.S.  dollar,  relative  to  all  other  currencies  in  which  we  operate,  which  may  materially  affect  our  results  of
operations. Where possible, we manage foreign currency risk by managing same currency revenues in relation to

58

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

same currency expenses. As of December 31, 2014, a 1% increase in foreign currency exchange rates would have
impacted our shareholders’ equity by  approximately $56.1 million.

In  2012,  the  repurchase  of  $18.7  million  principal  amount  of  the  U.S.  dollar-denominated  5.375%
Convertible  Notes  resulted  in  a  foreign  exchange  gain  for  Canadian  income  tax  purposes  of  approximately
$1.0 million. The 2012 payment represents the settlement of the 5.375% Convertible Notes outstanding balance.
In 2012, the repurchase of principal amount of the U.S. dollar denominated revolving credit facility resulted in a
foreign exchange gain of $8.0 million. As of December 31, 2014, the aggregate unrealized foreign exchange loss
on the translation of the remaining principal amount of the senior secured credit facilities and senior notes was
approximately  $1,318.3  million  ($843.3  million  and  $475.0  million,  respectively)  for  Canadian  income  tax
purposes. Additionally, as of December 31, 2014, the unrealized foreign exchange gain on certain intercompany
balances was equal to $461.6 million. One-half of any realized foreign exchange gain or loss will be included in
our  Canadian  taxable  income.  Any  resulting  gain  will  result  in  a  corresponding  reduction  in  our  available
Canadian Non-Capital Losses, Scientific Research and Experimental Development Pool, and/or Investment Tax
Credit  carryforward  balances.  However,  the  repayment  of  the  senior  secured  credit  facilities  and  the
intercompany  loans  denominated  in  U.S.  dollars  does  not  result  in  a  foreign  exchange  gain  or  loss  being
recognized in our consolidated financial statements, as these statements are  prepared  in U.S.  dollars.

Interest Rate Risk

We currently do not hold financial instruments for speculative purposes. Our financial assets are not subject
to significant interest rate risk due to their short duration. The primary objective of our policy for the investment
of temporary cash surpluses is the protection of principal, and accordingly, we generally invest in high quality,
money market investments and time deposits with varying maturities, but typically less than three months. As it
is our intent and policy to hold these investments until maturity, we do not have a material exposure to interest
rate risk.

As of December 31, 2014, we had $8.8 billion and $6.6 billion principal amount of issued fixed rate debt and
variable rate debt, respectively, that requires U.S. dollar repayment. The estimated fair value of our issued fixed
rate debt as of December 31, 2014 was $9.3 billion. If interest rates were to increase by 100 basis-points, the fair
value of our long-term debt would decrease by approximately $257.2 million. If interest rates were to decrease by
100  basis-points,  the  fair  value  of  our  long-term  debt  would  increase  by  approximately  $145.0  million.  We  are
subject to interest rate risk on our variable rate debt as changes in interest rates could adversely affect earnings
and  cash  flows.  A  100  basis-points  increase  in  interest  rates,  based  on  3-month  LIBOR,  would  have  an
annualized  pre-tax  effect  of  approximately  $43.8  million  in  our  consolidated  statements  of  income  (loss)  and
cash flows, based on current outstanding borrowings and effective interest rates on our variable rate debt. For
the  tranches  in  our  credit  facility  that  have  a  LIBOR  floor,  an  increase  in  interest  rates  would  only  impact
interest expense on those term loans to the extent LIBOR exceeds the floor. While our variable-rate debt may
impact earnings and cash flows as interest  rates change, it is  not subject to changes in fair value.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Critical  accounting  policies  and  estimates  are  those  policies  and  estimates  that  are  most  important  and
material  to  the  preparation  of  our  consolidated  financial  statements,  and  which  require  management’s  most
subjective and complex judgments due to the need to select policies from among alternatives available, and to
make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. We base our estimates on historical experience and
other  factors  that  we  believe  to  be  reasonable  under  the  circumstances.  On  an  ongoing  basis,  we  review  our
estimates to ensure that these estimates appropriately reflect changes in our business and new information as it
becomes available. If historical experience and other factors we use to make these estimates do not reasonably
reflect future activity, our results of operations and financial condition  could  be  materially impacted.

59

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Revenue Recognition

We  recognize  product  sales  revenue  when  title  has  transferred  to  the  customer  and  the  customer  has
assumed the risks and rewards of ownership, the timing of which is based on the specific contractual terms with
each  customer.  In  most  instances,  transfer  of  title  as  well  as  the  risks  and  rewards  of  ownership  occurs  upon
delivery  of  the  product  to  the  customer.  Revenue  from  product  sales  is  recognized  net  of  provisions  for
estimated  cash  discounts,  allowances,  returns,  rebates,  and  chargebacks,  as  well  as  distribution  fees  paid  to
certain of our wholesale customers. We establish these provisions concurrently with the recognition of product
sales revenue.

Under  certain  product  manufacturing  and  supply  agreements,  we  rely  on  estimates  for  future  returns,
rebates  and  chargebacks  made  by  our  commercialization  counterparties.  We  make  adjustments  as  needed  to
state  these  estimates  on  a  basis  consistent  with  our  revenue  recognition  policy  and  our  methodology  for
estimating returns, rebates, and chargebacks related to our own direct product sales.

We  continually  monitor  our  product  sales  provisions  and  evaluate  the  estimates  used  as  additional
information  becomes  available.  We  make  adjustments  to  these  provisions  periodically  to  reflect  new  facts  and
circumstances that may indicate that historical experience may not be indicative of current and/or future results.
We are required to make subjective judgments based primarily on our evaluation of current market conditions
and trade inventory levels related to our products. This evaluation may result in an increase or decrease in the
experience rate that is applied to current  and  future sales, or  an  adjustment  related to past  sales, or  both.

Product Sales Provisions

The  following  table  presents  the  activity  and  ending  balances  for  our  product  sales  provisions  for  each  of

the last three years.

Discounts
and
Allowances

Returns

Rebates

Chargebacks

Distribution
Fees

($ in millions)

$

$

$

$

Reserve balance, January 1,  2012 . . . .
Acquisition of Medicis . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current year provision . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior year provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments or credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reserve balance, December 31, 2012 . .

Acquisition of B&L . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current year provision . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior  year provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments or credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reserve balance, December  31, 2013 . .

Acquisition of PreCision . . . . . . . . . . .
Current year provision . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior  year provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments or credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reserve balance, December  31, 2014 . .

7.8
2.4
67.1

—
(58.6)

18.7

49.0
241.8
(0.6)
(218.2)

90.7

3.5
422.1
0.9
(390.8)

126.4

121.1
148.4
432.2
2.0
(334.4)

369.3

104.1
1,277.1
—

(1,183.9)

566.6

31.4
1,271.5
(0.9)
(1,153.7)

714.9

15.2
2.4
191.4
—
(181.0)

28.0

20.8
407.1
0.9
(378.0)

78.8

1.5
985.1
—
(877.9)

187.5

119.1
61.0
57.4
(10.5)
(55.9)

171.1

55.4
124.6
1.7
(127.3)

225.5

20.7
285.9
10.3
(162.1)

380.3

60

$

11.5
7.7
44.8

—
(50.1)

13.9

11.7
156.9
—
(136.3)

Total

$

274.7
221.9
792.9
(8.5)
(680.0)

601.0

241.0
2,207.5
2.0
(2,043.7)

46.2

1,007.8

—
515.4
—
(476.5)

57.1
3,480.0
10.3
(3,061.0)

85.1

1,494.2

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Use of Information from External Sources

In  the  U.S.,  we  use  information  from  external  sources  to  estimate  our  product  sales  provisions.  We  have
data  sharing  agreements  with  the  three  largest  wholesalers  in  the  U.S.  Where  we  do  not  have  data  sharing
agreements,  we  use  third-party  data  to  estimate  the  level  of  product  inventories  and  product  demand  at
wholesalers and retail pharmacies. Third-party data with respect to prescription demand and inventory levels are
subject  to  the  inherent  limitations  of  estimates  that  rely  on  information  from  external  sources,  as  this
information may itself rely on certain estimates and reflect other  limitations.

Our  distribution  agreements  with  the  three  largest  wholesalers  in  the  U.S.  contain  target  inventory  levels
between  1⁄2  and  11⁄2  months  supply  of  our  products,  calculated  using  historical  demand.  Inventory  levels  can
fluctuate based on changes in demand, such as the launch of a new product (such as Jublia(cid:4)). The inventory data
from these wholesalers is provided to us in the aggregate rather than by specific lot number, which is the level of
detail that would be required to determine  the original  sale date  and remaining  shelf life of the  inventory.

Cash Discounts and Allowances

We offer cash discounts for prompt payment and allowances for volume purchases to customers. Provisions
for cash discounts are estimated at the time of sale and recorded as direct reductions to accounts receivable and
revenue.  We  estimate  provisions  for  cash  discounts  and  allowances  based  on  contractual  sales  terms  with
customers,  an  analysis  of  unpaid  invoices,  and  historical  payment  experience.  Estimated  cash  discounts  and
allowances  have  historically  been  predictable  and  less  subjective,  due  to  the  limited  number  of  assumptions
involved, the consistency of historical experience, and the fact that we generally settle these amounts within one
month of incurring the liability.

Returns

Consistent with industry practice, we generally allow customers to return product within a specified period
before and after its expiration date, excluding our European businesses which generally do not carry a right of
return.  Our  product  returns  provision  is  estimated  based  on  historical  sales  and  return  rates  over  the  period
during which customers have a right of return. We utilize the following information to estimate our provision for
returns:

(cid:127) historical return and exchange levels;

(cid:127) external data with respect to inventory levels in the  wholesale distribution channel;

(cid:127) external data with respect to prescription demand for our products;

(cid:127) remaining shelf lives of our products  at the date of sale; and

(cid:127) estimated returns liability to be processed by year of sale based on an analysis of lot information related

to actual historical returns.

In determining our estimates for returns, we are required to make certain assumptions regarding the timing
of the introduction of new products and the potential of these products to capture market share. In addition, we
make certain assumptions with respect to the extent and pattern of decline associated with generic competition.
To make these assessments, we utilize market data for similar products as analogs for our estimates. We use our
best judgment to formulate these assumptions based on past experience and information available to us at the
time.  We  continually  reassess  and  make  the  appropriate  changes  to  our  estimates  and  assumptions  as  new
information  becomes  available  to  us.  A  change  of  1%  in  the  estimated  return  rates  would  have  impacted  our
pre-tax earnings by approximately $50 million for the year  ended  December 31, 2014.

Our  estimate  for  returns  may  be  impacted  by  a  number  of  factors,  but  the  principal  factor  relates  to  the
level of inventory in the distribution channel. When we are aware of an increase in the level of inventory of our
products in the distribution channel, we consider the reasons for the increase to determine if the increase may be

61

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

temporary or other-than-temporary. Increases in inventory levels assessed as temporary will not differ from our
original estimates of our provision for returns. Other-than-temporary increases in inventory levels, however, may
be an indication that future product returns could be higher than originally anticipated, and, as a result, we may
need to adjust our estimate for returns. Some of the factors that may suggest that an increase in inventory levels
will be temporary include:

(cid:127) recently implemented or announced  price increases for our products;

(cid:127) new product launches or expanded  indications for  our existing products; and

(cid:127) timing of purchases by our wholesale customers.

Conversely,  factors  that  may  suggest  that  an  increase  in  inventory  levels  will  be  other-than-temporary

include:

(cid:127) declining sales trends based on prescription demand;

(cid:127) introduction of new products or generic competition;

(cid:127) increasing price competition from generic competitors; and

(cid:127) recent changes to the U.S. National Drug Codes (‘‘NDC’’) of our products, which could result in a period
of higher returns related to products with the old NDC, as our U.S. customers generally permit only one
NDC per product for identification and tracking within their  inventory  systems.

Rebates  and Chargebacks

We  are  subject  to  rebates  on  sales  made  under  governmental  and  managed-care  pricing  programs  in  the
U.S. We participate in state government-managed Medicaid programs, as well as certain other qualifying federal
and  state  government  programs  whereby  discounts  and  rebates  are  provided  to  participating  government
entities. Medicaid rebates are generally billed 45 days after the quarter, but can be billed up to 270 days after the
quarter in which the product is dispensed to the Medicaid participant. As a result, our Medicaid rebate reserve
includes an estimate of outstanding claims for end-customer sales that occurred but for which the related claim
has  not  been  billed  and/or  paid,  and  an  estimate  for  future  claims  that  will  be  made  when  inventory  in  the
distribution channel is sold through to plan participants. Our calculation also requires other estimates, such as
estimates of sales mix, to determine which sales are subject to rebates and the amount of such rebates. A change
of  1%  in  the  volume  of  product  sold  through  to  Medicaid  plan  participants  would  have  impacted  our  pre-tax
earnings  by  approximately  $48  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014.  Periodically,  we  adjust  the
Medicaid rebate reserve based on actual claims paid. Due to the delay in billing, adjustments to actual claims
paid may incorporate revisions of that reserve  for several periods.

Managed Care rebates relate to our contractual agreements to sell products to managed care organizations
and pharmacy benefit managers at contractual rebate percentages in exchange for volume and/or market share.
The  reserve  balance  for  Managed  Care  rebates  was  $263.3  million,  $147.7  million  and  $139.1  million  as  of
December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Chargebacks  relate  to  our  contractual  agreements  to  sell  products  to  group  purchasing  organizations  and
other  indirect  customers  at  contractual  prices  that  are  lower  than  the  list  prices  we  charge  wholesalers.  When
these group purchasing organizations or other indirect customers purchase our products through wholesalers at
these reduced prices, the wholesaler charges us for the difference between the prices they paid us and the prices
at which they sold the products to the  indirect customers.

In  estimating  our  provisions  for  rebates  and  chargebacks,  we  consider  relevant  statutes  with  respect  to
governmental pricing programs and contractual sales terms with managed-care providers and group purchasing
organizations.  We  estimate  the  amount  of  our  product  sales  subject  to  these  programs  based  on  historical
utilization levels. Changes in the level of utilization of our products through private or public benefit plans and
group purchasing organizations will affect the amount of rebates and chargebacks that we are obligated to pay.

62

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

We  continually  update  these  factors  based  on  new  contractual  or  statutory  requirements,  and  any  significant
changes in sales trends that may impact the  percentage of our products subject to rebates or  chargebacks.

The amount of managed care, Medicaid, and other rebates and chargebacks has become more significant as
a result of a combination of deeper discounts due to the price increases we implemented in each of the last three
years,  changes  in  our  product  portfolio  due  to  recent  acquisitions  and  increased  Medicaid  utilization  due  to
existing  economic  conditions  in  the  U.S.  Our  estimate  for  rebates  and  chargebacks  may  be  impacted  by  a
number of factors, but the principal factor  relates to the level  of inventory in  the distribution channel.

Rebate provisions are based on factors such as timing and terms of plans under contract, time to process
rebates, product pricing, sales volumes, amount of inventory in the distribution channel and prescription trends.
Accordingly, we generally assume that adjustments made to rebate provisions relate to sales made in the prior
years  due  to  the  delay  in  billing.  However,  we  assume  that  adjustments  made  to  chargebacks  are  generally
related to sales made in the current year, as we settle these amounts within a few months of original sale. Our
adjustments to actual in 2014, 2013 and  2012 were  not  material  to  our revenues or  earnings.

Consumer  Rebates  and  Loyalty  Programs  are  rebates  we  offer  on  many  of  our  products.  We  generally
account for these programs by establishing an accrual based on our estimate of the rebate and loyalty incentives
attributable to a sale. We accrue our estimates on historical experience and other relevant factors. We adjust our
accruals periodically throughout each quarter based on actual experience and changes in other factors, if any, to
ensure  the  balance  is  fairly  stated.  The  reserve  balance  for  consumer  rebates  and  loyalty  programs  was
$25.2  million,  $113.6  million  and  $66.8  million  as  of  December  31,  2014,  2013  and  2012,  respectively.  The
decrease  in  the  reserve  balance  as  of  December  31,  2014  was  due  to  the  sale  of  the  aesthetic  brands  (facial
aesthetic  fillers  and  toxins  assets)  to  Galderma  in  July  2014.  The  increase  in  the  reserve  balance  as  of
December  31,  2013  compared  to  December  31,  2012  was  due  to  the  launch  of  physician  rebate  incentive
program for the aesthetic brands.

Distribution Fees

We sell product primarily to wholesalers, and in some instances to large pharmacy chains such as CVS and
Wal-Mart.  We  have  entered  into  Distribution  Services  Agreements  (DSAs)  with  several  large  wholesale
customers such as McKesson, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal, and McKesson Specialty. Under the
DSA agreements, the wholesalers agree to provide services, and we pay contracted DSA Fees for these services
based on product volumes.

Acquisitions

We have completed several acquisitions of companies, as well as acquisitions of certain assets of companies.
To determine whether such acquisitions qualify as business combinations or asset acquisitions, we make certain
judgments,  which  include  assessment  of  the  inputs,  processes,  and  outputs  associated  with  the  acquired  set  of
activities. If we determine that the acquisition consists of inputs, as well as processes that when applied to those
inputs have the ability to create outputs, the acquisition is determined to be a business combination. In instances
where  the  acquired  set  of  activities  does  not  include  all  of  the  inputs  and  processes  used  by  the  seller  in
operating the business, we make judgments as to whether market participants would be capable of acquiring the
business and continuing to produce outputs, for example, by integrating the business with their own inputs and
processes. If we conclude that market participants would have this capability, the acquisition is determined to be
business combination.

In a business combination, we account for acquired businesses using the acquisition method of accounting,
which requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at fair value, with limited exceptions. The
judgments  made  in  determining  the  estimated  fair  value  assigned  to  each  class  of  asset  acquired  and  liability
assumed  can  materially  impact  our  results  of  operations.  As  part  of  our  valuation  procedures,  we  typically
consult  an  independent  advisor.  There  are  several  methods  that  can  be  used  to  determine  fair  value.  For
intangible assets, we typically use an excess earnings or relief from royalty method. The excess earnings method

63

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

starts with a forecast of the net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset over its estimated useful life.
These  cash  flows  are  then  adjusted  to  present  value  by  applying  an  appropriate  discount  rate  that  reflects  the
risk  factors  associated  with  the  cash  flow  streams.  Some  of  the  more  significant  estimates  and  assumptions
inherent in the excess earnings method  include:

(cid:127) the amount and timing of projected future cash flows, adjusted for the probability of technical success of

products in the IPR&D stage;

(cid:127) the amount and timing of projected costs to develop  IPR&D into  commercially viable products;

(cid:127) the discount rate selected to measure  the risks  inherent in  the future  cash flows;  and

(cid:127) an  assessment  of  the  asset’s  life-cycle  and  the  competitive  trends  impacting  the  asset,  including

consideration of any technical, legal,  regulatory, or economic  barriers to entry.

The  relief  from  royalty  method  involves  estimating  the  amount  of  notional  royalty  income  that  could  be
generated  if  the  intangible  asset  was  licensed  to  a  third  party.  The  fair  value  of  the  intangible  asset  is  the  net
present  value  of  the  prospective  stream  of  the  notional  royalty  income  that  would  be  generated  over  the
expected  useful  life  of  the  intangible  asset.  Values  derived  using  the  relief  from  royalty  method  are  based  on
royalty rates observed for comparable  intangible assets.

We believe the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable
assumptions,  however,  these  assumptions  may  be  incomplete  or  inaccurate,  and  unanticipated  events  and
circumstances may occur. We will finalize these amounts as we obtain the information necessary to complete the
measurement  processes.  Any  changes  resulting  from  facts  and  circumstances  that  existed  as  of  the  acquisition
dates  may  result  in  retrospective  adjustments  to  the  provisional  amounts  recognized  at  the  acquisition  dates.
These  changes  could  be  significant.  We  will  finalize  these  amounts  no  later  than  one  year  from  the  respective
acquisition dates.

Determining  the  useful  life  of  an  intangible  asset  also  requires  judgment,  as  different  types  of  intangible
assets will have different useful lives and certain assets may even be considered to have indefinite useful lives.
Useful  life  is  the  period  over  which  the  intangible  asset  is  expected  to  contribute  directly  or  indirectly  to  our
future cash flows. We determine the useful lives of intangible assets based on a number of factors, such as legal,
regulatory, or contractual provisions that may limit the useful life, and the effects of obsolescence, anticipated
demand, existence or absence of competition, and other economic factors on useful life. We determined that the
B&L corporate trademark has an indefinite useful life as there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive,
economic, or other factors that limit the useful  life of this intangible asset.

Acquisition-Related Contingent Consideration

Some  of  the  business  combinations  that  we  have  consummated  include  contingent  consideration  to  be
potentially paid based upon the occurrence of future events, such as sales performance and the achievement of
certain  future  development,  regulatory  and  sales  milestones.  Acquisition-related  contingent  consideration
associated with a business combination is initially recognized at fair value and then remeasured each reporting
period, with changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of income (loss). The estimates of fair
value  contain  uncertainties  as  they  involve  assumptions  about  the  likelihood  of  achieving  specified  milestone
criteria, projections of future financial performance, and assumed discount rates. Changes in the fair value of the
acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations result from several factors including changes in discount
periods  and  rates,  changes  in  the  timing  and  amount  of  revenue  estimates  and  changes  in  probability
assumptions  with  respect  to  the  likelihood  of  achieving  specified  milestone  criteria.  A  change  in  any  of  these
assumptions  could  produce  a  different  fair  value,  which  could  have  a  material  impact  on  our  results  of
operations.

64

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Intangible Assets

We evaluate potential impairments of amortizable intangible assets acquired through asset acquisitions or
business combinations if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets
may not be recoverable. Our evaluation is based on an assessment of potential indicators of impairment, such as:

(cid:127) an adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset. For
example,  a  successful  challenge  of  our  patent  rights  resulting  in  earlier  than  expected  generic
competition;

(cid:127) an  adverse  change  in  the  extent  or  manner  in  which  an  asset  is  used  or  is  expected  to  be  used.  For
example, a decision not to pursue a product line-extension strategy to enhance an existing product due to
changes in market conditions and/or technological advances; or

(cid:127) current or forecasted reductions in revenue, operating income, or cash flows associated with the use of an
asset.  For  example,  the  introduction  of  a  competing  product  that  results  in  a  significant  loss  of  market
share.

Impairment  exists  when  the  carrying  amount  of  an  amortizable  intangible  asset  is  not  recoverable  and  its
carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. A discounted cash flow analysis is typically used to determine fair
value  using  estimates  and  assumptions  that  market  participants  would  apply.  Some  of  the  estimates  and
assumptions  inherent  in  a  discounted  cash  flow  model  include  the  amount  and  timing  of  the  projected  future
cash flows, and the discount rate used to reflect the risks inherent in the future cash flows. A change in any of
these estimates and assumptions could produce a different fair value, which could have a material impact on our
results  of  operations.  In  addition,  an  intangible  asset’s  expected  useful  life  can  increase  estimation  risk,  as
longer-lived assets necessarily require longer-term cash flow forecasts, which for some of our intangible assets
can be up to 25 years. In connection with an impairment evaluation, we also reassess the remaining useful life of
the intangible asset and modify it, as appropriate.

Indefinite-lived  intangible  assets,  including  IPR&D  and  the  B&L  corporate  trademark,  are  tested  for
impairment  annually,  or  more  frequently  if  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  between  annual  tests  indicate
that  the  asset  may  be  impaired.  Impairment  losses  on  indefinite-lived  intangible  assets  are  recognized  based
solely on a comparison of their fair value to carrying value, without consideration of any recoverability test. In
particular, we will continue to monitor closely the progression of our R&D programs, including Vesneo(cid:5) (which
represents  a  large  portion  of  our  IPR&D  asset  balance),  as  their  likelihood  of  success  is  contingent  upon  the
achievement  of  future  development  milestones.  Refer  to  ‘‘Products  in  Development’’  above  for  additional
information regarding our R&D programs.

Goodwill

Goodwill  is  not  amortized  but  is  tested  for  impairment  at  least  annually  at  the  reporting  unit  level.  A
reporting unit is the same as, or one level below, an operating segment. The fair value of a reporting unit refers
to  the  price  that  would  be  received  to  sell  the  unit  as  a  whole  in  an  orderly  transaction  between  market
participants. We operate in two operating/reportable segments: Developed Markets and Emerging Markets. The
Developed Markets segment consists of four reporting units based on geography, namely (i) U.S., (ii) Canada
and Australia, (iii) Western Europe, and (iv) Japan. The Emerging Markets segment consists of three reporting
units  based  on  geography,  namely  (i)  Central/Eastern  Europe,  Middle  East  and  North  Africa,  (ii)  Latin
America, and (iii) Asia/South Africa. We conducted our annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of
2014. We estimated the fair values of our reporting units using a discounted cash flow analysis approach. These
calculations  contain  uncertainties  as  they  require  us  to  make  assumptions  about  future  cash  flows  and  the
appropriate discount rate to reflect the risk inherent in the future cash flows. A change in any of these estimates
and  assumptions  could  produce  a  different  fair  value,  which  could  have  a  material  impact  on  our  results  of
operations.  We  determined  that  none  of  the  goodwill  associated  with  our  reporting  units  was  impaired.  The
estimated fair values of each reporting unit substantially exceeded their carrying values at the date of testing. We

65

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

applied a hypothetical 15% decrease to the fair values of each reporting unit, which at such date, would not have
triggered additional impairment testing and analysis.

Contingencies

In  the  normal  course  of  business,  we  are  subject  to  loss  contingencies,  such  as  claims  and  assessments
arising  from  litigation  and  other  legal  proceedings,  contractual  indemnities,  product  and  environmental
liabilities,  and  tax  matters.  We  are  required  to  accrue  for  such  loss  contingencies  if  it  is  probable  that  the
outcome  will  be  unfavorable  and  if  the  amount  of  the  loss  can  be  reasonably  estimated.  We  evaluate  our
exposure to loss based on the progress of each contingency, experience in similar contingencies, and consultation
with our legal counsel. We re-evaluate all contingencies as additional information becomes available. Given the
uncertainties  inherent  in  complex  litigation  and  other  contingencies,  these  evaluations  can  involve  significant
judgment about future events. The ultimate outcome of any litigation or other contingency may be material to
our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. For a discussion of our current legal proceedings,
see note 20 to the 2014 Financial Statements.

Income Taxes

We  have  operations  in  various  countries  that  have  differing  tax  laws  and  rates.  Our  tax  structure  is
supported by current domestic tax laws in the countries in which we operate and the application of tax treaties
between the various countries in which we operate. Our income tax reporting is subject to audit by domestic and
foreign  tax  authorities.  Our  effective  tax  rate  may  change  from  year  to  year  based  on  changes  in  the  mix  of
activities and income allocated or earned among the different jurisdictions in which we operate, changes in tax
laws in these jurisdictions, changes in tax treaties between various countries in which we operate, changes in our
eligibility  for  benefits  under  those  tax  treaties,  and  changes  in  the  estimated  values  of  deferred  tax  assets  and
liabilities.  Such  changes  could  result  in  an  increase  in  the  effective  tax  rate  on  all  or  a  portion  of  our  income
and/or any of our subsidiaries.

Our provision for income taxes is based on a number of estimates and assumptions made by management.
Our  consolidated  income  tax  rate  is  affected  by  the  amount  of  income  earned  in  our  various  operating
jurisdictions,  the  availability  of  benefits  under  tax  treaties,  and  the  rates  of  taxes  payable  in  respect  of  that
income. We enter into many transactions and arrangements in the ordinary course of business in which the tax
treatment is not entirely certain. We must therefore make estimates and judgments based on our knowledge and
understanding of applicable tax laws and tax treaties, and the application of those tax laws and tax treaties to our
business,  in  determining  our  consolidated  tax  provision.  For  example,  certain  countries  could  seek  to  tax  a
greater share of income than has been provided for by us. The final outcome of any audits by taxation authorities
may  differ  from  the  estimates  and  assumptions  we  have  used  in  determining  our  consolidated  income  tax
provisions and accruals. This could result in a material effect on our consolidated income tax provision, results of
operations, and financial condition for  the period  in which  such determinations are made.

Our income tax returns are subject to audit in various jurisdictions. Existing and future audits by, or other
disputes with, tax authorities may not be resolved favorably for us and could have a material adverse effect on
our reported effective tax rate and after-tax cash flows. We record liabilities for uncertain tax positions, which
involve  significant  management  judgment.  New  laws  and  new  interpretations  of  laws  and  rulings  by  tax
authorities may affect the liability for uncertain tax positions. Due to the subjectivity and complex nature of the
underlying  issues,  actual  payments  or  assessments  may  differ  from  our  estimates.  To  the  extent  that  our
estimates  differ  from  amounts  eventually  assessed  and  paid  our  income  and  cash  flows  may  be  materially  and
adversely affected.

We assess whether it is more likely than not that we will realize the tax benefits associated with our deferred
tax assets and establish a valuation allowance for assets that are not expected to result in a realized tax benefit. A
significant  amount  of  judgment  is  used  in  this  process,  including  preparation  of  forecasts  of  future  taxable
income and evaluation of tax planning initiatives. If we revise these forecasts or determine that certain planning

66

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

events will not occur, an adjustment to the valuation allowance will be made to tax expense in the period such
determination is made.

Share-Based Compensation

We  recognize  employee  share-based  compensation,  including  grants  of  stock  options  and  RSUs,  at
estimated  fair  value.  As  there  is  no  market  for  trading  our  employee  stock  options,  we  use  the  Black-Scholes
option-pricing  model  to  calculate  stock  option  fair  values,  which  requires  certain  assumptions  related  to  the
expected  life  of  the  stock  option,  future  stock  price  volatility,  risk-free  interest  rate,  and  dividend  yield.  The
expected life of the stock option is based on historical exercise and forfeiture patterns. The expected volatility of
our common stock is estimated by using implied volatility in market traded options. The risk-free interest rate is
based on the rate at the time of grant for U.S. Treasury bonds with a remaining term equal to the expected life of
the stock option. Dividend yield is based on the stock option’s exercise price and expected annual dividend rate
at the time of grant. Changes to any of these assumptions, or the use of a different option-pricing model, such as
the lattice model, could produce a different fair value for share-based compensation expense, which could have a
material impact  on our results of operations.

We determine the fair value of each RSU granted based on the trading price of our common shares on the
date  of  grant,  unless  the  vesting  of  the  RSU  is  conditional  on  the  attainment  of  any  applicable  performance
goals,  in  which  case  we  use  a  Monte  Carlo  simulation  model.  The  Monte  Carlo  simulation  model  utilizes
multiple input variables to estimate the probability that the performance condition will be achieved. Changes to
any of these inputs could materially affect the measurement of the fair value of the performance-based RSUs.

Employee Benefits

Our  benefits  plans  include  defined  benefit  pension  plans,  defined  contribution  plans  and  a  participatory
defined  benefit  postretirement  plan.  The  determination  of  defined  benefit  pension  and  postretirement  plan
obligations  and  their  associated  expenses  requires  the  use  of  actuarial  valuations  to  estimate  the  benefits
employees  earn  while  working,  as  well  as  the  present  value  of  those  benefits.  Inherent  in  these  valuations  are
economic  assumptions  including  expected  returns  on  plan  assets,  discount  rates  at  which  liabilities  could  be
settled,  rates  of  increase  in  healthcare  costs,  rates  of  future  compensation  increases  as  well  as  employee
demographic assumptions such as retirement patterns, mortality and turnover. The actuarial assumptions used
may  differ  materially  from  actual  results  due  to  changing  market  and  economic  conditions,  higher  or  lower
turnover  rates  or  longer  or  shorter  life  spans  of  participants.  Actual  results  that  differ  from  the  actuarial
assumptions  used  are  recorded  as  actuarial  gains  and  losses.  We  review  the  assumptions  annually  (and  more
frequently if a significant event occurs) and make any necessary  changes.

Our U.S. defined benefit pension plan and our Ireland plans incurred net actuarial losses of $30.3 million
and $84.7 million in 2014, respectively, reflecting the increase in the plan’s obligation resulting primarily from a
lower discount rate, partially offset by an actual return on plan assets exceeding expected returns for the Ireland
plan.

The  following  is  a  discussion  of  the  most  significant  assumptions  used  in  connection  with  our  employee
benefit plans. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was developed based on a capital markets
model  that  uses  expected  asset  class  returns,  variance  and  correlation  assumptions.  The  expected  asset  class
returns were developed starting with current Treasury (for the U.S. pension plan) or Eurozone (for the Ireland
pension plans) government yields and then adding corporate bond spreads and equity risk premiums to develop
the return expectations for each asset class. The expected asset class returns are forward-looking. The variance
and  correlation  assumptions  are  also  forward-looking.  They  take  into  account  historical  relationships,  but  are
adjusted to reflect expected capital market trends. The expected return on plan assets for the Company’s U.S.
pension plan for 2014 was 7.50% and for the postretirement benefit plan was 5.50%. The expected return for the
postretirement  plan  is  based  on  the  expected  return  for  the  U.S.  pension  plan  reduced  by  2.00%  to  reflect  an

67

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

estimate  of  additional  administrative  expenses.  The  expected  return  on  plan  assets  for  the  Company’s  Ireland
pension plans was 6.00% for 2014.

The 2015 expected rate of return for the U.S. pension plan and postretirement plan will remain at 7.50%
and 5.50%, respectively. The 2015 expected rate of return for the Ireland pension benefit plans will remain at
6.00%.

The  discount  rate  reflects  the  current  rate  at  which  the  benefit  plan  liabilities  could  be  effectively  settled
considering the timing of expected payments for plan participants. The discount rates for the U.S. pension and
postretirement benefit plans and the Ireland pension plans were based on models that calculate a discount rate
as an average of semi-annual spot rates weighted by the estimated projected plan cash flows. The models for the
U.S. pension and postretirement benefit plans were derived from pricing and yield information on high quality
non-callable U.S. corporate bonds.

Due  to  the  long-term  nature  of  the  Ireland  pension  plans  projected  cash  flows  and  the  lack  of  long-term
high quality corporate bonds in the Eurozone, the model for the Ireland pension plans was derived from pricing
and  yield  information  on  Eurozone  treasury  bonds.  An  option-adjusted  spread  was  added  to  the  resulting
Eurozone treasury yield curve to produce a proxy to high quality corporate bonds. The discount rate used for the
U.S. pension and postretirement plans at December 31, 2014 was 3.90% and 3.70%, respectively. The discount
rate used for the Ireland plans at December  31, 2014 was 2.40%.

The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the U.S. pension and postretirement plan and Ireland plan
obligations and expenses to changes in the above assumptions, assuming all other assumptions remain constant.

Changes in Assumption

Pre-Tax Impact on
U.S. Pension Benefit
Plan Expenses
(Decrease) Increase

Impact on
U.S. Pension Benefit
Plan Liabilities
(Decrease) Increase

($ in millions)

Expected return on plan assets
Increase one percentage point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease one percentage point
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount rate
Increase one percentage point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease one percentage point

$ (1.9)
1.9

(1.3)
(0.3)

Not applicable
Not applicable

$(24.0)
26.3

Changes in Assumption

Expected return on plan assets
Increase one percentage point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease one percentage point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount rate
Increase one percentage point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease one percentage point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pre-Tax Impact on
Postretirement Benefit
Plan Expenses
(Decrease) Increase

Impact on
Postretirement  Benefit
Plan Liabilities
(Decrease) Increase

($ in millions)

$ (0.1)
0.1

0.4
(0.4)

Not applicable
Not applicable

$(4.6)
5.4

68

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Changes in Assumption

Pre-Tax Impact on
Ireland Plan Expenses
(Decrease) Increase

Impact on Ireland
Plan Liabilities
(Decrease) Increase

($ in millions)

Expected return on plan assets
Increase one percentage point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease one percentage point
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount rate
Increase one percentage point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease one percentage point

$ (1.2)
1.2

(2.0)
0.4

Not applicable
Not applicable

$(50.4)
66.6

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Information  regarding  the  recently  issued  new  accounting  guidance  (adopted  and  not  adopted  as  of

December 31, 2014) is contained in note  2 to the 2014  Financial Statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Caution  regarding  forward-looking  information  and  statements  and  ‘‘Safe-Harbor’’  statements  under  the

U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform  Act  of 1995:

To  the  extent  any  statements  made  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  contain  information  that  is  not
historical, these statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act  of  1933,  as  amended,  and  Section  21E  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and  may  be
forward-looking  information  within  the  meaning  defined  under  applicable  Canadian  securities  legislation
(collectively, ‘‘forward-looking statements’’).

These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things: the expected benefits of our acquisitions
and other transactions (including the proposed acquisition of Salix), such as cost savings, operating synergies and
growth  potential  of  the  Company;  business  plans  and  prospects,  prospective  products  or  product  approvals,
future performance or results of current and anticipated products; exposure to foreign currency exchange rate
changes  and  interest  rate  changes;  the  outcome  of  contingencies,  such  as  certain  litigation  and  regulatory
proceedings;  general  market  conditions;  and  our  expectations  regarding  our  financial  performance,  including
revenues, expenses, gross margins, liquidity and income taxes.

Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of words such as ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘anticipate’’,
‘‘expect’’,  ‘‘intend’’,  ‘‘estimate’’,  ‘‘plan’’,  ‘‘continue’’,  ‘‘will’’,  ‘‘may’’,  ‘‘could’’,  ‘‘would’’,  ‘‘should’’,  ‘‘target’’,
‘‘potential’’,  ‘‘opportunity’’,  ‘‘tentative’’,  ‘‘positioning’’,  ‘‘designed’’,  ‘‘create’’,  ‘‘predict’’,  ‘‘project’’,  ‘‘seek’’,
‘‘ongoing’’, ‘‘increase’’, or ‘‘upside’’ and variations or other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that
refer  to  expectations,  projections  or  other  characterizations  of  future  events  or  circumstances  are  forward-
looking statements. These forward-looking statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. Although we
have  indicated  above  certain  of  these  statements  set  out  herein,  all  of  the  statements  in  this  Form  10-K  that
contain  forward-looking  statements  are  qualified  by  these  cautionary  statements.  These  statements  are  based
upon the current expectations and beliefs of management. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in
such  forward-looking  statements  are  reasonable,  such  statements  involve  risks  and  uncertainties,  and  undue
reliance should not be placed on such statements. Certain material factors or assumptions are applied in making
forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, factors and assumptions regarding the items outlined
above.  Actual  results  may  differ  materially  from  those  expressed  or  implied  in  such  statements.  Important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these expectations include, among other things,
the following:

(cid:127) the  challenges  and  difficulties  associated  with  managing  the  rapid  growth  of  our  Company  and  a  large

complex business;

69

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(cid:127) our ability to retain, motivate and  recruit executives and other  key  employees;

(cid:127) the introduction of products that compete against our products that do not have patent or data exclusivity

rights;

(cid:127) our ability to compete against companies that are larger and have greater financial, technical and human
resources  than  we  do,  as  well  as  other  competitive  factors,  such  as  technological  advances  achieved,
patents obtained and new products introduced by our competitors;

(cid:127) our ability to identify, finance, acquire, close and integrate acquisition targets successfully and on a timely

basis;

(cid:127) factors relating to the acquisition and integration of the companies, businesses and products acquired by
the  Company,  such  as  the  time  and  resources  required  to  integrate  such  companies,  businesses  and
products,  the  difficulties  associated  with  such  integrations  (including  potential  disruptions  in  sales
activities and potential challenges with information technology systems integrations), the difficulties and
challenges associated with entering into new business areas and new geographic markets, the difficulties,
challenges and costs associated with managing and integrating new facilities, equipment and other assets,
and  the  achievement  of  the  anticipated  benefits  from  such  integrations,  as  well  as  risks  associated  with
the acquired companies, businesses and  products;

(cid:127) factors relating to our ability to achieve all of the estimated synergies from our acquisitions as a result of
cost-rationalization and integration initiatives. These factors may include greater than expected operating
costs,  the  difficulty  in  eliminating  certain  duplicative  costs,  facilities  and  functions,  and  the  outcome  of
many  operational and strategic decisions, some  of which  have not yet been made;

(cid:127) factors relating to our proposed acquisition of Salix, including our ability to consummate such transaction
on a timely basis, if at all; the impact of substantial additional debt on our financial condition and results
of operations; our ability to effectively and timely integrate the operations of the Company and Salix; our
ability to achieve the estimated synergies from this proposed transaction; and, once integrated, the effects
of such business combination on our  future financial condition, operating results, strategy and plans;

(cid:127) our  ability  to  secure  and  maintain  third  party  research,  development,  manufacturing,  marketing  or

distribution arrangements;

(cid:127) our eligibility for benefits under tax treaties and the continued availability of low effective tax rates for

the business profits of certain of our  subsidiaries;

(cid:127) our substantial debt and debt service obligations and their impact on our financial condition and results

of operations;

(cid:127) our  future  cash  flow,  our  ability  to  service  and  repay  our  existing  debt,  our  ability  to  raise  additional
funds,  if  needed,  and  any  restrictions  that  are  or  may  be  imposed  as  a  result  of  our  current  and  future
indebtedness, in light of our current and projected levels of operations, acquisition activity and general
economic conditions;

(cid:127) any downgrade by rating agencies in our corporate credit ratings, which may impact, among other things,

our  ability to raise additional debt capital and  implement  elements  of  our growth strategy;

(cid:127) interest rate risks associated with our  floating  rate debt borrowings;

(cid:127) the  risks  associated  with  the  international  scope  of  our  operations,  including  our  presence  in  emerging
markets  and  the  challenges  we  face  when  entering  new  geographic  markets  (including  the  challenges
created by new and different regulatory regimes in such countries);

(cid:127) adverse global economic conditions and credit market and foreign currency exchange uncertainty in the
countries in which we do business (such as the recent instability in Russia, Ukraine and the Middle East);

70

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(cid:127) economic factors over which the Company has no control, including changes in inflation, interest rates,
foreign  currency  rates,  and  the  potential  effect  of  such  factors  on  revenues,  expenses  and  resulting
margins;

(cid:127) the introduction of generic competitors of our  branded products;

(cid:127) our  ability  to  obtain  and  maintain  sufficient  intellectual  property  rights  over  our  products  and  defend

against challenges to such intellectual property;

(cid:127) the outcome of legal proceedings,  arbitrations, investigations and regulatory proceedings;

(cid:127) the risk that our products could cause, or be alleged to cause, personal injury and adverse effects, leading
to  potential  lawsuits,  product  liability  claims  and  damages  and/or  withdrawals  of  products  from  the
market;

(cid:127) the availability of and our ability to obtain and maintain adequate insurance coverage and/or our ability
to  cover  or  insure  against  the  total  amount  of  the  claims  and  liabilities  we  face,  whether  through  third
party insurance or self-insurance;

(cid:127) the difficulty in predicting the expense, timing and outcome within our legal and regulatory environment,
including  with  respect  to  approvals  by  the  U.S.  Food  and  Drug  Administration,  Health  Canada  and
similar  agencies  in  other  countries,  legal  and  regulatory  proceedings  and  settlements  thereof,  the
protection  afforded  by  our  patents  and  other  intellectual  and  proprietary  property,  successful  generic
challenges  to  our  products  and  infringement  or  alleged  infringement  of  the  intellectual  property  of
others;

(cid:127) the results of continuing safety and efficacy studies by industry and government agencies;

(cid:127) the  availability  and  extent  to  which  our  products  are  reimbursed  by  government  authorities  and  other
third party payors, as well as the impact of obtaining or maintaining such reimbursement on the price of
our  products;

(cid:127) the inclusion of our products on formularies or our ability to achieve favorable formulary status, as well

as the impact on the price of our products in connection therewith;

(cid:127) the impact of price control restrictions on our products, including the risk of mandated price reductions;

(cid:127) the success of preclinical and clinical trials for our drug development pipeline or delays in clinical trials
that adversely impact the timely commercialization of our pipeline products, as well as factors impacting
the  commercial  success  of  our  currently  marketed  products,  which  could  lead  to  material  impairment
charges;

(cid:127) the  results  of  management  reviews  of  our  research  and  development  portfolio,  conducted  periodically
and  in  connection  with  certain  acquisitions,  the  decisions  from  which  could  result  in  terminations  of
specific  projects which, in turn, could lead  to  material  impairment charges;

(cid:127) negative publicity or reputational harm to our  products and business;

(cid:127) the uncertainties associated with the acquisition and launch of new products, including, but not limited to,
the  acceptance  and  demand  for  new  pharmaceutical  products,  and  the  impact  of  competitive  products
and pricing;

(cid:127) our ability to obtain components, raw materials or finished products supplied by third parties and other

manufacturing and related supply difficulties, interruptions  and delays;

(cid:127) the disruption of delivery of our products and the  routine  flow of manufactured goods;

(cid:127) the seasonality of sales of certain of  our products;

71

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(cid:127) declines  in  the  pricing  and  sales  volume  of  certain  of  our  products  that  are  distributed  or  marketed  by

third parties, over which we have no or limited control;

(cid:127) compliance with, or the failure to comply with, health care ‘‘fraud and abuse’’ laws and other extensive
regulation  of  our  marketing,  promotional  and  pricing  practices,  worldwide  anti-bribery  laws  (including
the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), worldwide environmental laws and regulation and privacy and
security regulations;

(cid:127) the  impacts  of  the  Patient  Protection  and  Affordable  Care  Act  (as  amended)  and  other  legislative  and

regulatory healthcare reforms in the countries in which we operate;

(cid:127) interruptions, breakdowns or breaches  in our information technology systems; and

(cid:127) other  risks  detailed  from  time  to  time  in  our  filings  with  the  SEC  and  the  Canadian  Securities
Administrators (the ‘‘CSA’’), as well as our ability to anticipate and manage the risks associated with the
foregoing.

Additional information about these factors and about the material factors or assumptions underlying such
forward-looking statements may be found elsewhere in this Form 10-K, under Item 1A. ‘‘Risk Factors’’, and in
the Company’s other filings with the SEC and CSA. When relying on our forward-looking statements to make
decisions with respect to the Company, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and
other uncertainties and potential events. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. We
undertake  no  obligation  to  update  or  revise  any  of  these  forward-looking  statements  to  reflect  events  or
circumstances  after  the  date  of  this  Form  10-K  or  to  reflect  actual  outcomes,  except  as  required  by  law.  We
caution  that,  as  it  is  not  possible  to  predict  or  identify  all  relevant  factors  that  may  impact  forward-looking
statements, the foregoing list of important factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive and should not
be considered a complete statement  of all potential risks and uncertainties.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON DISCLOSURE CONTROLS  AND PROCEDURES AND  INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We  performed  an  evaluation  of  the  effectiveness  of  our  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  that  are
designed to ensure that the material financial and non-financial information required to be disclosed on reports
and  filed  or  submitted  with  the  SEC  is  recorded,  processed,  summarized,  and  reported  in  a  timely  manner.
Based on our evaluation, our management, including Chief Executive Officer (the ‘‘CEO’’) and Chief Financial
Officer (‘‘CFO’’), has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2014 are effective. Notwithstanding the
foregoing,  there  can  be  no  assurance  that  our  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  will  detect  or  uncover  all
failures of persons within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our
reports.

Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

Our  management  is  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  adequate  internal  control  over  financial
reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with
generally accepted accounting principles.

Under  the  supervision  and  with  the  participation  of  management,  including  our  CEO  and  CFO,  we
conducted  an  evaluation  of  the  effectiveness  of  our  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  based  on  the
framework  described  in  Internal  Control  —  Integrated  Framework  (2013)  issued  by  the  Committee  of

72

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission.  Based  on  its  evaluation  under  this  framework,
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 has
been  audited  by  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP,  an  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm,  as  stated  in
their report on page F-3 of the 2014 Form 10-K.

Changes  in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There  were  no  changes  in  our  internal  controls  over  financial  reporting  identified  in  connection  with  the
evaluation thereof by our management, including the CEO and CFO, during the quarter ended December 31,
2014  that  have  materially  affected,  or  are  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  our  internal  controls  over
financial reporting.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative  Disclosures About Market Risk

Information  relating  to  quantitative  and  qualitative  disclosures  about  market  risk  is  detailed  in  Item  7.
‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market  Risk’’  and  is incorporated herein  by  reference.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The  information  required  by  this  Item  is  contained  in  the  financial  statements  set  forth  in  Item  15.
‘‘Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules’’ as  part of this Form  10-K  and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants  on Accounting  and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

The  Company’s  management,  with  the  participation  of  the  Company’s  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief
Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
‘‘Exchange Act’’)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the ‘‘Evaluation Date’’). Based on
such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
the Evaluation Date, the Company’s  disclosure controls  and  procedures are  effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

(a) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Management’s Annual
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is incorporated herein by reference from Part II,
Item 8 of this report.

(b) Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Report of the Registered Public Accounting
Firm  on  the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  is  incorporated  herein  by  reference
from Part II, Item 8 of this report.

(c) Changes  in  Internal  Control  Over  Financial  Reporting. There  have  not  been  any  changes  in  the
Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  (as  such  term  is  defined  in  Rules  13a-15(f)  and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter of 2014 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially  affect, the  Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

73

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and  Corporate Governance

PART III

Information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference from information included in the

2015 Proxy Statement.

The  Board  of  Directors  has  adopted  a  Code  of  Ethics  that  applies  to  our  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Chief
Financial  Officer,  the  principal  accounting  officer,  controller,  and  all  vice  presidents  and  above  in  the  finance
department of the Company worldwide. A copy of the Code of Ethics can be found as an annex to our Standards
of  Business  Conduct,  which  is  located  on  our  website  at:  www.valeant.com.  We  intend  to  satisfy  the  SEC
disclosure requirements regarding amendments to, or waivers from, any provisions of our Code of Ethics on our
website.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information  required  under  this  Item  relating  to  executive  compensation  is  incorporated  herein  by

reference from information included  in  the 2015 Proxy Statement.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners  and  Management and Related Stockholder

Matters

Information  required  under  this  Item  relating  to  securities  authorized  for  issuance  under  equity
compensation  plans  and  to  security  ownership  of  certain  beneficial  owners  and  management  is  incorporated
herein by reference from information  included in  the 2015 Proxy Statement.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director  Independence

Information required under this Item relating to certain relationships and transactions with related parties
and  about  director  independence  is  incorporated  herein  by  reference  from  information  included  in  the  2015
Proxy Statement.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and  Services

Information  required  under  this  Item  relating  to  the  fees  for  professional  services  rendered  by  our
independent  auditors  in  2014  and  2013  is  incorporated  herein  by  reference  from  information  included  in  the
2015 Proxy Statement.

74

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement  Schedules

Documents filed as a part of the report:

PART IV

(1) The  consolidated  financial  statements  required  to  be  filed  in  the  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  are

listed on page F-1 hereof.

(2) Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(All dollar amounts expressed in millions  of U.S. dollars)

Balance at
Beginning
of Year

Charged to
Costs and
Expenses

Charged to
Other
Accounts

Deductions

Balance at
End  of
Year

Year ended December 31,  2014
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax asset  valuation  allowance . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 27.6
$477.6

$
5.2
$272.6

Year ended December 31, 2013
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax asset  valuation  allowance . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 12.5
$124.5

$
5.8
$214.1

$
7.9
$109.0

$ 10.2
$139.0

Year ended December 31,  2012
Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax asset  valuation  allowance . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 12.3
$128.7

0.8
$
$ (2.2)

$ (0.5)
$ (2.0)

$(4.8)
$—

$(0.9)
$—

$(0.1)
$—

$ 35.9
$859.2

$ 27.6
$477.6

$ 12.5
$124.5

With respect to the deferred tax valuation allowance, the amount in 2014 charged to other accounts relates
primarily  to  foreign  currency  fluctuations  on  debt.  The  amount  in  2013  charged  to  other  accounts  relates
primarily to valuation allowances assumed as part of acquisitions consummated during the year, with the most
significant contributor being the B&L Acquisition.

(3) Exhibits

75

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

2.10

2.11

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 20, 2010, among Valeant, the Company, Biovail
Americas Corp. and Beach Merger Corp., originally filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2010, which is  incorporated by reference herein.††

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated January 31, 2011, between Biovail International S.a.r.l. and the
stockholders of PharmaSwiss SA, originally filed as Exhibit 2.7 to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 filed on February 28, 2011, which is
incorporated by reference herein.**††

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 2, 2011, between Biovail Laboratories International
SRL and GlaxoSmithKline LLC, originally filed as Exhibit 2.8 to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 filed on February 28, 2011, which is
incorporated by reference herein.**††

Asset  Purchase  Agreement  dated  July  8,  2011  among  the  Company,  Valeant  International
(Barbados) SRL and Sanofi, originally filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended  June  30,  2011  filed  on  August  8,  2011,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.**††

Asset Purchase Agreement dated July 15, 2011 among the Company (as guarantor only), Valeant
International  (Barbados)  SRL,  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  North  America  LLC  and  Janssen
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  2.2  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on
Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended  June  30,  2011  filed  on  August  8,  2011,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.**††

Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger,  dated  as  of  September  2,  2012,  among  the  Company,  Valeant,
Merlin Merger Sub, Inc. and Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, originally filed as Exhibit 2.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 4, 2012, which is incorporated
by reference herein.

Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger,  dated  as  of  March  19,  2013,  by  and  among  Valeant,  Odysseus
Acquisition Corp., the Company and Obagi Medical Products, Inc., originally filed as Exhibit 2.1
to Obagi Medical Products, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 20, 2013, which is
incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 3, 2013, by and among Valeant,
Odysseus  Acquisition  Corp.,  Obagi  Medical  Products,  Inc.  and  the  Company,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit 2.1 to Obagi Medical Products, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2013,
which is incorporated by reference herein.

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 24, 2013, by and among the Company, Valeant,
Stratos Merger Corp. and Bausch & Lomb Holdings Incorporated, originally filed as Exhibit 2.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2013, which is incorporated by
reference herein.

Amendment  No.  1,  dated  August  2,  2013,  to  the  Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger,  dated  as  of
May 24, 2013, by and among the Company, Valeant, Stratos Merger Corp. and Bausch & Lomb
Holdings  Incorporated,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  2.1  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013 filed on November 1, 2013, which is
incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment  No.  2,  dated  August  5,  2013,  to  the  Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger,  dated  as  of
May 24, 2013, by and among the Company, Valeant, Stratos Merger Corp. and Bausch & Lomb
Holdings  Incorporated,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  2.2  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013 filed on November 1, 2013, which is
incorporated by reference herein.

76

Exhibit
Number

2.12††

3.1

3.2

3.3

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

Exhibit Description

Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger,  dated  as  of  February  20,  2015,  among  the  Company,  Valeant,
Salix  Merger  Sub,  Inc.  and  Salix  Pharmaceuticals,  Ltd.,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  2.1  to  the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2015,  which  is incorporated  by reference herein.

Certificate of Continuation, dated August 9, 2013, originally filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 13, 2013, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Notice of Articles of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., dated August 9, 2013, originally
filed  as  Exhibit  3.2  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  August  13,  2013,
which is incorporated by reference herein.

Articles  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  dated  August  8,  2013,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  3.3  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  August  13,  2013,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.

Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2010, among Valeant, the Company, The Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, and the guarantors named therein, governing the 6.75%
Senior Notes due 2017 and the 7.00% Senior Notes due 2020, originally filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  October  1,  2010,  which  is  incorporated  by
reference herein.

Indenture, dated as of November 23, 2010, by and among Valeant, the Company, the guarantors
named  therein  and  The  Bank  of  New  York  Mellon  Trust  Company,  N.A.,  as  Trustee,  governing
the  6.875%  Senior  Notes  due  2018,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  4.1  to  the  Company’s  Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on November  26, 2010, which is  incorporated by reference herein.

Indenture,  dated  as  of  February  8,  2011,  by  and  among  Valeant,  the  Company,  the  guarantors
named  therein  and  The  Bank  of  New  York  Mellon  Trust  Company,  N.A.,  as  Trustee,  governing
the  6.750%  Senior  Notes  due  2021,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  4.1  to  the  Company’s  Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2011,  which  is  incorporated  by reference herein.

Indenture,  dated  as  of  March  8,  2011,  by  and  among  Valeant,  the  Company,  the  guarantors
named  therein  and  The  Bank  of  New  York  Mellon  Trust  Company,  N.A.,  as  Trustee,  governing
the  6.500%  Senior  Notes  due  2016  and  the  7.250%  Senior  Notes  due  2022,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  4.1  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  March  10,  2011,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.

Indenture,  dated  as  of  October  4,  2012  (the  ‘‘Escrow  Corp  Indenture’’),  by  and  among  VPI
Escrow Corp. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, governing the
6.375%  Senior  Notes  due  2020  (the  ‘‘2020  Senior  Notes’’),  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  4.1  to  the
Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  October  9,  2012,  which  is  incorporated  by
reference herein.

Supplemental  Indenture  to  the  Escrow  Corp  Indenture,  dated  as  of  October  4,  2012,  by  and
among VPI Escrow Corp., Valeant, the Company, the guarantors named therein and The Bank of
New  York  Mellon  Trust  Company,  N.A.,  as  Trustee  governing  the  2020  Senior  Notes,  originally
filed  as  Exhibit  4.2  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  October  9,  2012,
which is incorporated by reference herein.

Indenture,  dated  as  of  October  4,  2012,  by  and  among  Valeant,  the  Company,  the  guarantors
named  therein  and  The  Bank  of  New  York  Mellon  Trust  Company,  N.A.,  as  Trustee,  governing
the 6.375% Senior Notes due 2020 (the ‘‘6.375% Senior Notes’’), originally filed as Exhibit 4.3 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 9, 2012, which is incorporated by
reference herein.

Indenture,  dated  as  of  July  12,  2013,  between  VPII  Escrow  Corp.  and  the  Bank  of  New  York
Mellon  Trust  Company,  N.A.,  as  trustee,  respecting  the  6.75%  Senior  Notes  due  2018  and  the
7.50% Senior Notes due 2021, originally filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on  July 12, 2013, which is incorporated by  reference herein.

77

Exhibit
Number

4.9

4.10

4.11

10.1†

10.2†*

10.3†*

10.4†*

10.5†

10.6†

10.7†

10.8†

10.9†

Exhibit Description

Supplemental  Indenture  to  the  Indenture,  dated  as  of  July  12,  2013,  among  the  Company,  the
guarantors  named  therein  and  the  Bank  of  New  York  Mellon  Trust  Company,  N.A.,  as  trustee,
respecting  the  6.75%  Senior  Notes  due  2018  and  the  7.50%  Senior  Notes  due  2021,  originally
filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 12, 2013, which is
incorporated by reference herein.

Indenture, dated as of December 2, 2013, between the Company, the guarantors named therein
and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, respecting the 5.625% Senior
Notes  due  2021,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  4.1  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K
filed on December 2, 2013, which is incorporated  by reference herein.

Indenture,  dated  as  of  January  30,  2015,  between  the  Company,  the  guarantors  named  therein
and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, respecting the 5.50% Senior
Notes  due  2023,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  4.1  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K
filed on January 30, 2015, which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  2014  Omnibus  Incentive  Plan  (the  ‘‘2014  Omnibus
Incentive Plan’’), as approved by the shareholders on May 20, 2014, originally filed as Exhibit B to
the Company’s Management Proxy Circular and Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  April  22,  2014,  which  is  incorporated  by  reference
herein.

Form  of  Share  Unit  Grant  Agreement  (Performance  Vesting)  (Performance  Restricted  Share
Units), under the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement (Nonstatutory Stock Options), under the 2014 Omnibus
Incentive Plan.

Form  of  Matching  Restricted  Stock  Unit  Award  Agreement  (Matching  Units),  under  the  2014
Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  2011  Omnibus  Incentive  Plan  (the  ‘‘2011  Omnibus
Incentive Plan’’), effective as of April 6, 2011, as amended on and approved by the shareholders
on May 16, 2011, originally filed as Annex A to the Company’s Management Proxy Circular and
Proxy  Statement  on  Schedule  14A  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on
April  14,  2011,  as  amended  by  the  Supplement  dated  May  10,  2011  to  the  Company’s
Management  Proxy  Circular  and  Proxy  Statement  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on May 10, 2011, which is incorporated by reference  herein.

Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, originally filed
as  Exhibit  10.2  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2011 filed on February 28, 2012,  which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Form  of  Matching  Restricted  Stock  Unit  Grant  Agreement  under  the  2011  Omnibus  Incentive
Plan, originally filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year  ended  December  31,  2011  filed  on  February  28,  2012,  which  is  incorporated  by  reference
herein.

Form of Share Unit Grant Agreement (Performance Vesting) under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive
Plan, originally filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year  ended  December  31,  2011  filed  on  February  28,  2012,  which  is  incorporated  by  reference
herein.

Biovail  Corporation  2007  Equity  Compensation  Plan  (the  ‘‘2007  Equity  Compensation  Plan’’)
dated  as  of  May  16,  2007,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.49  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on
Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2009  filed  on  February  26,  2010,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.

78

Exhibit
Number

10.10†

10.11†

10.12†

10.13†

10.14†

10.15†

10.16†

10.17†

10.18†

10.19†

10.20†*

10.21†*

10.22

Exhibit Description

Amendment  No.  1  to  the  2007  Equity  Compensation  Plan  dated  as  of  December  18,  2008,
originally filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 filed on February 26, 2010, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment, dated April 6, 2011 and approved by the shareholders on May 16, 2011, to the 2007
Equity  Compensation  Plan,  originally  filed  as  Annex  B  to  the  Company’s  Management  Proxy
Circular  and  Proxy  Statement  on  Schedule  14A  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on April 14, 2011, which  is  incorporated by reference herein.

Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the 2007
Equity Compensation Plan, originally filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2010  filed  on  February  28,  2011,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.

Form  of  Unit  Grant  Notice  and  Form  of  Unit  Grant  Agreement  under  the  2007  Equity
Compensation  Plan,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.45  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on
Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2010  filed  on  February  28,  2011,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.

Form  of  Unit  Grant  Notice  (Performance  Vesting)  and  Form  of  Unit  Grant  Agreement
(Performance Vesting) under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan, originally filed as Exhibit 10.26
to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 filed
on February 28, 2011, which is  incorporated by reference herein.

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  Directors  Share  Unit  Plan,  effective  May  16,  2011,
originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.6  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2011 filed on August 8, 2011, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Biovail  Americas  Corp.  Executive  Deferred  Compensation  Plan,  as  amended  and  restated
effective  January  1,  2009,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.60  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on
Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2009  filed  on  February  26,  2010,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.

Employment  Agreement  between  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  and  J.  Michael
Pearson,  dated  as  of  January  7,  2015,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.1  to  the  Company’s  Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on January 13, 2015, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Employment Letter between the Company and Howard Schiller, dated as of November 10, 2011,
originally filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2011 filed on February 29, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Employment Letter between the Company and Robert Chai-Onn, dated as of January 13, 2014,
originally filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2013 filed on February 28, 2014, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Employment Letter between  the Company and Ari Kellen  dated  as of December 30, 2014.

Employment Letter between  the Company and Pavel Mirovsky dated as of April 2, 2012.

Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and  Guaranty  Agreement,  dated  as  of  February  13,  2012,
among  the  Company,  certain  subsidiaries  of  the  Company  as  guarantors,  each  of  the  lenders
named  therein,  J.P.  Morgan  Securities  LLC,  Goldman  Sachs  Lending  Partners  LLC  (‘‘GSLP’’)
and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. (‘‘Morgan Stanley’’), as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint
Bookrunners,  JPMorgan  Chase  Bank,  N.A.  (‘‘JPMorgan’’)  and  Morgan  Stanley,  as
Co-Syndication  Agents,  JPMorgan,  as  Issuing  Bank,  GSLP,  as  Administrative  Agent  and
Collateral Agent, and the other agents party thereto (the ‘‘Third Amended and Restated Credit
and  Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.’’),  originally  filed  as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2012, which is
incorporated by reference herein.

79

Exhibit
Number

10.23

10.24

10.25

10.26

10.27

10.28

10.29

10.30

10.31*

10.32

10.33

10.34

Exhibit Description

Amendment  No.  1,  dated  March  6,  2012,  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.1  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended
September 30, 2012 filed on November  5, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment  No.  2,  dated  September  10,  2012,  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.2  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended
September 30, 2012 filed on November  5, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment  No.  3,  dated  January  24,  2013,  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.25  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2012 filed on February 28, 2013,  which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Amendment  No.  4,  dated  February  21,  2013,  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.26  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2012 filed on February 28, 2013,  which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Amendment  No.  5,  dated  as  of  June  6,  2013,  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.3  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended
June 30, 2013 filed on August 7, 2013, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment  No.  6,  dated  June  26,  2013,  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.4  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended
June 30, 2013 filed on August 7, 2013, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment  No.  7,  dated  September  17,  2013,  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.3  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended
September 30, 2013 filed on November  1, 2013, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment  No.  8,  dated  December  20,  2013,  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.28  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2013 filed on February 28, 2014,  which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Successor Agent Agreement and Amendment No. 9 to the Third Amended and Restated Credit
and Guaranty Agreement of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., dated as of January 8,
2015, by and among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company as guarantors, each of the
lenders named therein, Barclays Bank PLC,  as  the successor agent, and GSLP.

Joinder  Agreement,  dated  June  14,  2012,  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.1  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  June  15,  2012,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.

Joinder Agreement, dated July 9, 2012, to the Third Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty
Agreement of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., originally filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended  June  30,  2012  filed  on
August 3, 2012, which is incorporated  by reference  herein.

Joinder Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2012, to the Third Amended and Restated Credit
and  Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.3  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended
September 30, 2012 filed on November  5, 2012, which is incorporated by reference herein.

80

Exhibit
Number

10.35

10.36

10.37

10.38

10.39

10.40

10.41*

10.42*

10.43

10.44

Exhibit Description

Joinder Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, to the Third Amended and Restated Credit and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.1  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  October  9,  2012,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.

Joinder Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2012, to the Third Amended and Restated Credit
and  Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.31  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2012 filed on February 28, 2013,  which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Joinder  Agreement  dated  August  5,  2013  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  relating  to  the  Series  A-2
Tranche  A  Term  Loans,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.5  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed on August 7, 2013, which is incorporated by
reference herein.

Joinder  Agreement  dated  August  5,  2013  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  relating  to  the  Series  E
Tranche  B  Term  Loans,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.6  to  the  Company’s  Quarterly  Report  on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 filed on August 7, 2013, which is incorporated by
reference herein.

Joinder  Agreement  dated  February  6,  2014  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  relating  to  the  Additional
Series A-3 Tranche A Term Loan Commitment, originally filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 filed on February 28,
2014, which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Joinder  Agreement  dated  February  6,  2014  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  relating  to  the  Series  E-1
Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Commitment,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.37  to  the  Company’s  Annual
Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2013  filed  on  February  28,  2014,
which is incorporated by reference herein.

Joinder  Agreement  dated  January  22,  2015  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  relating  to  the  New
Revolving Loan Commitment.

Joinder  Agreement  dated  January  22,  2015  to  the  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  relating  to  the  Additional
Series A-3 Tranche A Term Loan Commitment.

Commitment  Letter,  dated  as  of  May  24,  2013,  among  the  Company,  Valeant,  Goldman  Sachs
Lending  Partners  LLC  and  Goldman  Sachs  Bank  USA,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.1  to  the
Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  May  31,  2013,  which  is  incorporated  by
reference herein.

Second Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of October 20, 2011,
among  the  Company,  certain  subsidiaries  of  the  Company,  as  Guarantors,  each  of  the  lenders
named  therein,  GSLP  and  J.P.  Morgan  Securities  LLC,  as  Joint  Lead  Arrangers  and  Joint
Bookrunners, JPMorgan, as Syndication Agent and Issuing Bank, GSLP, as Administrative Agent
and  Collateral  Agent,  and  the  other  agents  party  thereto  (the  ‘‘Second  Amended  and  Restated
Credit and Guaranty Agreement of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.’’), originally filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2011, which is
incorporated by reference herein.

81

Exhibit
Number

10.45

10.46

10.47

10.48

10.49

10.50

10.51

10.52

10.53

10.54

Exhibit Description

Amendment No. 1, dated as of February 13, 2012, to the Second Amended and Restated Credit
and  Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2012, which is
incorporated by reference herein.

Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and  Guaranty  Agreement,  dated  as  of  August  10,  2011,  among
Valeant, and the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Guarantors, each of the
lenders named therein, GSLP as Sole Lead Arranger, Sole Bookrunner and Syndication Agent,
and  GSLP,  as  Administrative  Agent  and  Collateral  Agent  (the  ‘‘Amended  and  Restated  Credit
and  Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International’’),  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.1  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K  filed  on  August  15,  2011,  which  is
incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment  No.  1,  dated  as  of  August  12,  2011,  to  the  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty Agreement of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, originally filed as Exhibit 10.3 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 15, 2011, which is incorporated by
reference herein.

Amendment  No.  2,  dated  as  of  September  6,  2011,  to  the  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty Agreement of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, originally filed as Exhibit 10.32 to
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 filed
on February 29, 2012, which is  incorporated by reference herein.

Amendment  No.  3,  dated  as  of  October  20,  2011,  to  the  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and
Guaranty Agreement of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, originally filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2011, which is incorporated by
reference herein.

Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated June 29, 2011, among Valeant, the Company and certain
subsidiaries  of  the  Company,  as  Guarantors,  each  of  the  lenders  named  therein,  GSLP  as  Sole
Lead Arranger, Sole Bookrunner and Syndication Agent, and GSLP, as Administrative Agent and
‘‘Credit  and  Guaranty  Agreement  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals
Collateral  Agent  (the 
International’’),  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.1  to  the  Company’s  Current  Report  on  Form  8-K
filed on July 6, 2011, which is incorporated by reference  herein.

Amendment  No.  1,  dated  as  of  August  10,  2011,  to  the  Credit  and  Guaranty  Agreement  of
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, originally filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on August 15, 2011, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Trademark  and  Domain  Name  License  Agreement,  dated  as  of  February  22,  2011,  by  and
between  GlaxoSmithKline  LLC  and  Biovail  Laboratories  International  SRL,  originally  filed  as
Exhibit  10.31  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2010 filed on February 28, 2011,  which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Plea Agreement and Side Letter, dated as of May 16, 2008, between United States Attorney for
the District of Massachusetts and Biovail Pharmaceuticals, Inc., originally filed as Exhibit 10.30 to
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 filed
on February 26, 2010, which is  incorporated by reference herein.

Corporate Integrity Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2009, between the Company and the
Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, originally filed as
Exhibit  10.31  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2009 filed on February 26, 2010,  which is incorporated by  reference herein.

82

Exhibit
Number

10.55

10.56

10.57

10.58

10.59

10.60

10.61

21.1*

23.1*

31.1*

31.2*

32.1*

32.2*

Exhibit Description

Settlement  Agreement,  dated  as  of  September  11,  2009,  among  the  United  States  of  America,
United States Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health
and Human Services and the Company, originally filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Annual
Report  on  Form  10-K  filed  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2009  filed  on  February  26,
2010, which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Securities Litigation, Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated as of April 4, 2008, between
the United States District Court, Southern District of New York and the Company, originally filed
as  Exhibit  10.33  to  the  Company’s  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2009 filed on February 26, 2010,  which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Settlement  Agreement,  dated  January  7,  2009,  between  Staff  of  the  Ontario  Securities
Commission and the Company, originally filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 filed on February 26, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference herein.

Settlement  Agreement,  dated  March  2008,  between  the  U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission and the Company, originally filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 filed on February 26, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference herein.

Letter  Agreement,  dated  May  30,  2014,  between  the  Company  and  Pershing  Square  Capital
Management,  L.P.,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  99.3  to  the  Company’s  Schedule  13D/A  filed  on
June 2, 2014, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Letter Agreement, dated February 25, 2014, between the Company and Pershing Square Capital
Management  L.P.,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  99.3  to  the  Company’s  Schedule  13D  filed  on
April 21, 2014, which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Commitment  Letter,  dated  as  of  February  20,  2015,  among  the  Company,  Valeant,  Deutsche
Bank  AG  New  York  Branch,  Deutsche  Bank  AG  Cayman  Islands  Branch,  Deutsche  Bank
Securities Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, HSBC Bank Canada, The Hongkong and
Shanghai  Banking  Corporation  Limited,  HSBC  Securities  (USA)  Inc.,  The  Bank  of  Tokyo-
Mitsubishi  UFJ,  Ltd.,  DNB  Capital  LLC,  DNB  Markets,  Inc.,  SunTrust  Bank  and  SunTrust
Robinson  Humphrey,  Inc.,  originally  filed  as  Exhibit  10.1  to  the  Company’s  Form  8-K  filed  on
February 23, 2015, which is incorporated by  reference herein.

Subsidiaries of Valeant  Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

*101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

83

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

*101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

*101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

*101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

* Filed herewith.

** Portions  of  this  exhibit  have  been  omitted  pursuant  to  an  application  for,  or  an  order  with  respect  to,  confidential  treatment.  Such

information has been omitted and filed separately with the SEC.

† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

†† One or more exhibits or schedules to this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. We undertake to

furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibit or  schedule  to  the SEC upon request.

84

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant

has duly caused this report to be signed  on its behalf  by the undersigned,  thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

Date: February 25, 2015

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.
(Registrant)

By: /s/ J. MICHAEL PEARSON

J. Michael Pearson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by

the following persons on behalf of the registrant and  in the capacities and  on the  dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ J. MICHAEL PEARSON

J. Michael Pearson

/s/ HOWARD B. SCHILLER

Howard B. Schiller

/s/ ROBERT A. INGRAM

Robert A. Ingram

/s/ RONALD H. FARMER

Ronald H. Farmer

/s/ COLLEEN GOGGINS

Colleen  Goggins

/s/ ANDERS O. L¨ONNERS
Anders O. L¨onners

/s/ THEO MELAS-KYRIAZI

Theo Melas-Kyriazi

/s/ ROBERT N. POWER

Robert N. Power

/s/ NORMA A. PROVENCIO

Norma A. Provencio

/s/ KATHARINE B. STEVENSON

Katharine B. Stevenson

/s/ JEFFREY W. UBBEN

Jeffrey W. Ubben

Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer

February 25, 2015

Executive Vice-President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
and Director

February 25, 2015

Lead Director

February 25,  2015

Director

February 25, 2015

Director

February 25, 2015

Director

February 25, 2015

Director

February 25, 2015

Director

February 25, 2015

Director

February 25, 2015

Director

February 25, 2015

Director

February 25, 2015

85

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS

Reports of Management on Financial  Statements and Internal Control Over  Financial Reporting . . . .

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting  Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31,  2014 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for  the years ended December 31, 2014,  2013 and  2012 . . .

Page

F-2

F-3

F-4

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive  Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014,

2013 and 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31,  2014, 2013

and 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  for  the years ended December  31, 2014,  2013 and 2012 . . . . .

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-7

F-8

F-9

F-1

REPORTS OF MANAGEMENT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER  FINANCIAL REPORTING

Financial Statements

The  Company’s  management  is  responsible  for  preparing  the  accompanying  consolidated  financial
statements  in  conformity  with  United  States  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (‘‘U.S.  GAAP’’).  In
preparing these consolidated financial statements, management selects appropriate accounting policies and uses
its  judgment  and  best  estimates  to  report  events  and  transactions  as  they  occur.  Management  has  determined
such amounts on a reasonable basis in order to ensure that the consolidated financial statements are presented
fairly, in all material respects. Financial information included throughout this Annual Report is prepared on a
basis consistent with that of the accompanying  consolidated financial statements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has been engaged by the Company’s shareholders to audit the consolidated

financial statements.

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibility for financial
reporting and is ultimately responsible for reviewing and approving the consolidated financial statements. The
Board  of  Directors  carries  out  this  responsibility  principally  through  its  Audit  and  Risk  Committee.  The
members of the Audit and Risk Committee are outside Directors. The Audit and Risk Committee considers, for
review  by  the  Board  of  Directors  and  approval  by  the  shareholders,  the  engagement  or  reappointment  of  the
external  auditors. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has  full and free  access to the Audit and  Risk Committee.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The
Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  is  a  process  designed  to  provide  reasonable  assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  the  Company  conducted  an  evaluation  of  the  effectiveness  of  its  internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework
(2013)  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission.  Based  on  its
evaluation  under  this  framework,  management  concluded  that  the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial
reporting was effective as of December 31,  2014.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 has
been  audited  by  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP,  an  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm,  as  stated  in
their report on page F-3 herein.

/s/ J. MICHAEL PEARSON

J. Michael Pearson
Chairman of the Board and
Chief  Executive Officer

February 25, 2015

/s/ HOWARD B. SCHILLER

Howard  B. Schiller
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Directors of
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International,  Inc.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of
income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows present fairly, in all material
respects,  the  financial  position  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  and  its  subsidiaries  (the
‘‘Company’’) at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows  for  each  of  the  three  years  in  the  period  ended  December  31,  2014  in  conformity  with  accounting
principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America.  In  addition,  in  our  opinion,  the  financial
statement schedule appearing under item 15 (2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein,  when  read  in  conjunction  with  the  related  consolidated  financial  statements.  Also  in  our  opinion,  the
Company  maintained,  in  all  material  respects,  effective  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of
December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by
the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission  (COSO).  The  Company’s
management  is  responsible  for  these  financial  statements  and  financial  statement  schedule,  for  maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over  financial  reporting,  included  in  the  accompanying  Report  of  Management  on  Internal  Control  over
Financial  Reporting.  Our  responsibility  is  to  express  opinions  on  these  financial  statements,  on  the  financial
statement  schedule,  and  on  the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  based  on  our  integrated
audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board  (United  States).  Those  standards  require  that  we  plan  and  perform  the  audits  to  obtain  reasonable
assurance  about  whether  the  financial  statements  are  free  of  material  misstatement  and  whether  effective
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  was  maintained  in  all  material  respects.  Our  audits  of  the  financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements,  assessing  the  accounting  principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management,  and
evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement  presentation.  Our  audit  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting
included  obtaining  an  understanding  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  assessing  the  risk  that  a
material  weakness  exists,  and  testing  and  evaluating  the  design  and  operating  effectiveness  of  internal  control
based  on  the  assessed  risk.  Our  audits  also  included  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we  considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits  provide a reasonable  basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles.  A  company’s  internal  control  over  financial
reporting  includes  those  policies  and  procedures  that  (i)  pertain  to  the  maintenance  of  records  that,  in
reasonable  detail,  accurately  and  fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and  dispositions  of  the  assets  of  the  company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,  and  that  receipts  and  expenditures  of
the  company  are  being  made  only  in  accordance  with  authorizations  of  management  and  directors  of  the
company;  and  (iii)  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  prevention  or  timely  detection  of  unauthorized
acquisition,  use,  or  disposition  of  the  company’s  assets  that  could  have  a  material  effect  on  the  financial
statements.

Because  of  its  inherent  limitations,  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  may  not  prevent  or  detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls  may  become  inadequate  because  of  changes  in  conditions,  or  that  the  degree  of  compliance  with  the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, New Jersey
February 25, 2015

F-3

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(All dollar amounts expressed in millions  of U.S. dollars)

Assets
Current assets:

Cash and  cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade receivables, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held for  sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and  equipment,  net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

As of December 31,

2014

2013

322.6
2,075.8
950.6
641.9
8.9
193.3

4,193.1
1,310.5
11,255.9
9,346.4
54.0
193.1

$

600.3
1,676.4
883.0
343.4
15.9
366.9

3,885.9
1,234.2
12,848.2
9,752.1
54.9
195.5

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 26,353.0

$ 27,970.8

Liabilities
Current liabilities:

Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related  contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion  of  long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax liabilities,  net

$

Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related  contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension and other benefit liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities for uncertain  tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax liabilities,  net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Commitments and contingencies  (Notes  20  and 21)

Equity
Common shares, no par value,  unlimited  shares authorized,  334,402,964 and

333,036,637 issued and outstanding at  December  31,  2014 and 2013,  respectively . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive  loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total Valeant Pharmaceuticals International,  Inc. shareholders’  equity . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

398.0
2,179.4
141.8
0.9
10.7

2,730.8
167.0
15,253.7
239.8
102.6
2,227.5
197.1

20,918.5

$

327.0
1,800.2
114.5
204.8
66.0

2,512.5
241.3
17,162.9
172.0
169.1
2,319.2
160.5

22,737.5

8,349.2
243.9
(2,365.0)
(915.9)

5,312.2
122.3

5,434.5

8,301.2
228.8
(3,278.5)
(132.8)

5,118.7
114.6

5,233.3

Total liabilities  and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 26,353.0

$ 27,970.8

On behalf of the Board:

/s/ J. MICHAEL PEARSON

/s/ NORMA A.  PROVENCIO

J. Michael Pearson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive  Officer

Norma  A. Provencio
Chairperson,  Audit and Risk  Committee

The  accompanying  notes are  an integral  part of these  consolidated financial statements.

F-4

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME  (LOSS)

(All dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S.  dollars, except per  share data)

Revenues
Product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Expenses
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of amortization and impairments  of  finite-lived

intangible assets shown separately below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of other revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization and impairments of finite-lived intangible assets (see Note 10) . . . . . . .
Restructuring, integration and other  costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In-process research and development impairments  and  other  charges . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (income) expense (see Notes 3, 4, and 20) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Operating income  (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on investments, net (see Note 23) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (loss) before  provision for (recovery of)  income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling  interest

Net income (loss) attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals  International, Inc.

. . . . . .

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended December 31,

2014

2013

2012

$ 8,103.6
159.9

$ 5,640.3
129.3

$ 3,288.6
191.8

8,263.5

5,769.6

3,480.4

2,196.2
58.4
2,026.3
246.0
1,550.7
381.7
41.0
6.3
(14.1)
(268.7)

1,846.3
58.8
1,305.2
156.8
1,902.0
462.0
153.6
36.4
(29.2)
287.2

905.1
64.6
756.1
79.1
928.9
267.1
189.9
78.6
(5.3)
136.6

6,223.8

6,179.1

3,400.7

2,039.7
5.0
(971.0)
(129.6)
(144.1)
292.6

1,092.6
180.4

912.2
(1.3)

(409.5)
8.0
(844.3)
(65.0)
(9.4)
5.8

(1,314.4)
(450.8)

(863.6)
2.5

79.7
6.0
(481.6)
(20.1)
19.7
2.1

(394.2)
(278.2)

(116.0)
—

$

$

$

913.5

$ (866.1) $ (116.0)

2.72

2.67

$

$

(2.70) $

(0.38)

(2.70) $

(0.38)

Weighted-average common shares (in millions)

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

335.4

341.5

321.0

321.0

305.4

305.4

The accompanying notes are an integral part of  these  consolidated financial statements.

F-5

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(All dollar amounts expressed in millions  of U.S. dollars)

Net income (loss)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

912.2

$

(863.6) $

(116.0)

Years Ended December 31,

2014

2013

2012

Other comprehensive (loss) income
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Unrealized gain on equity method investment, net  of  tax:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Arising in period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification to  net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale equity  securities:

Arising in period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification to  net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale debt  securities:

Reclassification to  net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

(717.8)

(50.9)

Pension and postretirement benefit plan adjustments:

Newly established prior service credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net actuarial (loss) gain  arising during  the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of prior service credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization or settlement recognition  of net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Currency impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Comprehensive income (loss)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less: Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to  noncontrolling  interest

. . . . . . .

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals

29.4
(127.3)
(2.5)
0.9
27.4
5.2

(66.9)

(784.7)

127.5

(2.9)

(717.8)

(50.5)

161.0

51.3
(51.3)

1.8
(1.8)

—
—

3.6
(4.0)

—
—

0.4
(1.6)

0.2

160.0

—

(0.5)

0.7

—

—
—

0.2

160.2

44.2

27.9
24.5

—

0.6
(15.4)
0.2

37.8

(13.1)

(876.7)

2.8

—

International, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

130.4

$

(879.5) $

44.2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(All dollar amounts expressed in millions  of U.S. dollars)

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

Notes .

Balance, January  1, 2012 .
.
Settlement of  5.375% Convertible  Notes .
Repurchase of equity component of 5.375% Convertible
.
.
Common shares issued under share-based compensation
.

.
.
.
.
Repurchase of common shares .
.
.
.
Share-based compensation .
Employee withholding taxes related to share-based  awards
.
Tax benefits from stock options  exercised .

.
.

.

.
.

.

plans .

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Comprehensive income:
.

Net  loss
.
.
Other  comprehensive income .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Total comprehensive income .

Balance, December 31, 2012 .

.

.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

plans .

Issuance of common  stock (see  Note  14)
Common shares  issued under  share-based  compensation
.

.
.
.
.
Repurchase of common  shares (see Note 14)
Share-based compensation .
.
.
.
Employee  withholding  taxes related to  share-based  awards
.
Tax benefits from stock options exercised .
.
.
Noncontrolling  interest  from business  combinations .
.
.
Noncontrolling  interest  distributions .

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Comprehensive loss:
.

Net  loss
.
.
Other  comprehensive loss .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Total comprehensive loss .

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

plans .

Balance,  December 31,  2013 .
Common shares issued under share-based  compensation
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Settlement of stock options
Share-based compensation .
.
.
Employee withholding taxes related to share-based  awards
.
.
Tax benefits from stock options  exercised .
.
Noncontrolling interest from business  combinations .
.
.
Acquisition of  noncontrolling interest
.
.
Noncontrolling interest distributions .

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.

Comprehensive income:

Net income
.
.
Other comprehensive loss .

.

.

.

.

.

.

Total comprehensive income .

Balance,  December 31,  2014 .

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. Shareholders

Common Shares

Shares

Amount

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Accumulated
Other

Accumulated Comprehensive

Deficit

Loss

Valeant
Pharmaceuticals
International, Inc.
Shareholders’
equity

Noncontrolling
Interest

Total
Equity

306.4
—

$

5,963.6
—

$

276.1
(0.2)

$

(2,030.3)
(43.6)

$

(279.6)
—

$

3,929.8
(43.8)

$ —
—

$

3,929.8
(43.8)

—

—

(0.2)

(2.7)

2.8
(5.3)
—
—
—

79.4
(102.3)
—
—
—

303.9

5,940.7

—
—

—
—

303.9

27.6

2.2
(0.7)
—
—
—
—
—

5,940.7

2,306.9

67.8
(14.2)

—
—
—
—
—

(56.2)
—

66.2
(31.1)
12.5

267.1

—
—

—

—
—
—
—
—

(2.9)

23.2
(280.7)
66.2
(31.1)
12.5

—
(178.4)
—
—
—

(2,255.0)

(279.6)

3,673.2

(116.0)
—

—
160.2

267.1

(2,371.0)

(119.4)

—

(61.4)
—

45.5
(46.6)
24.2

—
—

—

—

(41.4)

—
—
—
—
—

—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—

(116.0)
160.2

44.2

3,717.4

2,306.9

6.4
(55.6)
45.5
(46.6)
24.2

—
—

333.0

8,301.2

228.8

(2,412.4)

(119.4)

5,998.2

—
—

—
—

—
—

(866.1)
—

—
(13.4)

333.0

8,301.2

228.8

(3,278.5)

(132.8)

1.4

48.0

—
—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—

(31.9)
(3.1)
78.2
(44.1)
17.1

—

(1.1)

—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

334.4

8,349.2

243.9

(3,278.5)

(132.8)

—
—

—
—

—
—

913.5

—

—
(783.1)

(866.1)
(13.4)

(879.5)

5,118.7

16.1
(3.1)
78.2
(44.1)
17.1

—

—

(1.1)

5,181.8

913.5
(783.1)

130.4

—

—
—
—
—
—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—
—
—
—
—
113.9
(2.1)

111.8

2.5
0.3

2.8

(2.9)

23.2
(280.7)
66.2
(31.1)
12.5

3,673.2

(116.0)
160.2

44.2

3,717.4

2,306.9

6.4
(55.6)
45.5
(46.6)
24.2
113.9
(2.1)

6,110.0

(863.6)
(13.1)

(876.7)

114.6

5,233.3

—
—
—
—
—

15.0
(2.2)
(2.2)

16.1
(3.1)
78.2
(44.1)
17.1
15.0
(3.3)
(2.2)

125.2

5,307.0

(1.3)
(1.6)

(2.9)

912.2
(784.7)

127.5

334.4

$

8,349.2

$

243.9

$

(2,365.0)

$

(915.9)

$

5,312.2

$

122.3

$ 5,434.5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of  these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(All dollar amounts expressed in millions  of U.S. dollars)

Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income  (loss) .
.
.
.
.
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net  cash provided  by operating activities:

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

Depreciation and amortization, including  impairments  of finite-lived intangible assets .
.
Amortization and write-off  of  debt discounts  and debt  issuance  costs
.
.
.
In-process research and development  impairments
.
.
.
.
Acquisition accounting adjustment on  inventory sold .
.
.
Acquisition-related contingent consideration .
.
.
.
.
Allowances for losses  on accounts receivable  and  inventories
.
.
.
.
.
.
Deferred income taxes
.
.
.
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets and  businesses .
.
.
.
(Reduction) additions  to accrued legal  settlements
.
.
.
.
.
Payments of accrued legal settlements
.
.
.
.
Share-based compensation .
.
.
.
.
.
.
Tax benefits from stock options  exercised .
.
.
.
.
.
Foreign exchange loss  (gain) .
.
.
Loss on extinguishment  of debt
.
.
.
.
.
Payment of accreted  interest on contingent  consideration .
Other .
.
.
.
.
.
. .
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
.
.
.
. .

. . .
.
.
.
. . .
.
.
. . .
. . .
. . .
.
.
.
. . .
. . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . .
.
.
.

.
Trade receivables
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Inventories .
Prepaid expenses and  other  current assets .
.
Accounts payable, accrued and other  liabilities .

. . .
.
.
.
. . .
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Net cash provided by operating activities .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
.
.
Acquisition of businesses, net  of  cash acquired .
.
.
.
Acquisition of intangible  assets  and other assets .
.
Purchases of property, plant  and equipment
.
.
Proceeds from sale of assets and  businesses,  net  of  costs  to  sell
.
Proceeds from sales and maturities  of  marketable  securities  and short-term investments .
.
Purchases of marketable securities and  short-term  investments .
.
.
Purchase of equity method  investment .
.
.
.
Proceeds from sale of equity method  investment .
.
.
.
Increase in restricted cash .

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Net cash used in investing  activities .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
.
Issuance of long-term debt, net  of discount .
.
.
.
.
.
Repayments of long-term debt
.
.
.
.
.
.
Short-term  debt borrowings .
.
.
.
.
Short-term  debt repayments .
.
.
.
.
.
.
Issuance of common stock, net .
.
.
.
Repurchases of common  shares .
.
.
.
Proceeds from exercise of stock options .
.
.
.
Tax benefits from stock options  exercised .
Cash settlement of convertible debt
.
.
.
.
Payment of employee withholding tax upon  vesting  of  share-based  awards .
.
Payments of contingent consideration .
.
.
Payments of financing costs .
.
.
.
.
.
Other

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

. .

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Net cash (used in) provided by  financing  activities .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Effect  of exchange rate  changes on cash  and  cash equivalents .

Net (decrease) increase in cash and  cash  equivalents
.
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning  of  year .

.

.

Cash and cash equivalents, end  of  year .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.
.

.

Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Acquisition of businesses, contingent  consideration  at fair value .
.
Acquisition of businesses, debt assumed .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

Years Ended December 31,

2014

2013

2012

$

912.2

$ (863.6)

$ (116.0)

1,737.6
70.0
21.0
27.3
(14.1)
81.3
81.8
(253.5)
(44.7)
(3.2)
78.2
(17.1)
135.1
129.6
(10.7)
32.3

(572.4)
(174.3)
(110.3)
188.6

2,015.8
89.5
151.9
372.4
(29.2)
68.3
(515.9)
10.2
220.5
(180.8)
45.5
(24.2)
9.8
65.0
(11.1)
(3.8)

(300.6)
(122.7)
121.5
(76.5)

2,294.7

1,042.0

986.2
36.4
167.7
78.8
(5.3)
21.8
(319.6)
10.8
56.8
(41.8)
66.2
(12.5)
(23.8)
20.1
(2.3)
(13.6)

(175.8)
(80.3)
11.2
(8.4)

656.6

(1,102.6)
(179.0)
(291.6)
1,492.3
53.2
(72.0)
(75.9)
75.9

—

(5,253.5)
(69.6)
(115.3)
41.1
35.2
(18.2)
—
—
—

(3,485.3)
(73.5)
(107.6)
92.0
624.8
(7.2)

—
—

(8.9)

(99.7)

(5,380.3)

(2,965.7)

1,632.6
(3,888.0)
19.4
(28.4)
—
—

17.2
17.1

—
(44.1)
(106.1)
(55.2)
(8.2)

8,429.6
(6,326.2)
27.4
(75.1)
2,307.4
(55.6)
10.0
24.2

—
(65.5)
(130.1)
(116.3)
(2.1)

6,005.8
(1,929.1)
35.4
(31.1)
—
(280.7)
23.0
12.5
(606.3)
(31.1)
(103.9)
(33.2)
(4.0)

(2,443.7)

4,027.7

3,057.3

(29.0)

(277.7)
600.3

(5.2)

(315.8)
916.1

3.8

752.0
164.1

$

322.6

$

600.3

$

916.1

$

(93.8)
(11.2)

$

(76.1)
(4,264.7)

$ (145.7)
(825.2)

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.
.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of  these consolidated financial statements.

F-8

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  (the  ‘‘Company’’)  is  a  multinational,  specialty  pharmaceutical
and medical device company that develops, manufactures, and markets a broad range of branded, generic
and  branded  generic  pharmaceuticals,  over-the-counter  (‘‘OTC’’)  products,  and  medical  devices  (contact
lenses,  intraocular  lenses,  ophthalmic  surgical  equipment,  and  aesthetics  devices),  which  are  marketed
directly  or  indirectly  in  over  100  countries.  Effective  August  9,  2013,  the  Company  continued  from  the
federal  jurisdiction  of  Canada  to  the  Province  of  British  Columbia,  meaning  that  the  Company  became  a
company registered under the laws of the Province of British Columbia as if it had been incorporated under
the  laws  of  the  Province  of  British  Columbia.  As  a  result  of  this  continuance,  the  legal  domicile  of  the
Company became the Province of British Columbia, the Canada Business Corporations Act ceased to apply
to the Company and the Company became subject  to  the British Columbia Business Corporations  Act.

On August 5, 2013, the Company acquired Bausch & Lomb Holdings Incorporated (‘‘B&L’’), pursuant to
an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended (the ‘‘Merger Agreement’’) dated May 24, 2013, with B&L
surviving  as  a  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International  (‘‘Valeant’’),  a  wholly-
owned  subsidiary  of  the  Company  (the  ‘‘B&L  Acquisition’’).  B&L  is  a  global  eye  health  company  that
focuses primarily on the development, manufacture and marketing of eye health products, including contact
lenses, contact lens care solutions, ophthalmic pharmaceuticals and ophthalmic surgical  products.

For further information regarding the B&L Acquisition, see note 3 titled ‘‘BUSINESS COMBINATIONS’’.

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  by  the  Company  in  United  States  (‘‘U.S.’’)
dollars  and  in  accordance  with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (‘‘GAAP’’),  applied  on  a
consistent basis.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and those of its subsidiaries and
any  variable  interest  entities  (‘‘VIEs’’)  for  which  the  Company  is  the  primary  beneficiary.  All  significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Reclassifications

Certain  reclassifications  have  been  made  to  prior  year  amounts  to  conform  with  the  current  year
presentation. Such amounts include a reclassification of (i) $52.8 million recognized in the third quarter of
2013  related  to  B&L’s  previously  cancelled  performance-based  options  and  the  acceleration  of  unvested
stock  options  for  B&L  employees  from  Restructuring,  integration  and  other  costs  to  Other  (income)
expense  on  the  consolidated  statement  of  income  (loss)  and  (ii)  $77.3  million  recognized  in  the  fourth
quarter  of  2012  related  to  the  acceleration  of  unvested  stock  options,  restricted  stock  awards,  and  share
appreciation  rights  for  Medicis  Pharmaceutical  Corporation  (‘‘Medicis’’)  employees  that  was  triggered  by
the  change  in  control  from  Restructuring,  integration  and  other  costs  to  Other  (income)  expense  on  the
consolidated statement of income (loss).

The  reclassifications  described  above  had  no  effect  on  the  Company’s  previously  reported  results  of
operations, financial position or cash flows.

F-9

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

Acquisitions

Acquired  businesses  are  accounted  for  using  the  acquisition  method  of  accounting,  which  requires  that
assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at fair value, with limited exceptions. Any excess of the
purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Transaction costs and
costs to restructure the acquired company are expensed as incurred. The operating results of the acquired
business  are  reflected  in  our  consolidated  financial  statements  after  the  date  of  acquisition.  Acquired
in-process research and development (‘‘IPR&D’’) is recognized at fair value and initially characterized as
an indefinite-lived intangible asset, irrespective of whether the acquired IPR&D has an alternative future
use. If the acquired net assets do not constitute a business under the acquisition method of accounting, the
transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition and no goodwill is recognized. In an asset acquisition,
the  amount  allocated  to  acquired  IPR&D  with  no  alternative  future  use  is  charged  to  expense  at  the
acquisition date.

Use of Estimates

In preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during  the  reporting  periods.  Significant  estimates  made  by  management  include:  provisions  for  product
returns,  rebates,  chargebacks,  discounts  and  allowances,  and  distribution  fees  paid  to  certain  wholesalers;
useful lives of amortizable intangible assets and property, plant and equipment; expected future cash flows
used  in  evaluating  intangible  assets  for  impairment;  reporting  unit  fair  values  in  testing  goodwill  for
impairment;  provisions  for  loss  contingencies;  provisions  for  income  taxes,  uncertain  tax  positions  and
realizability  of  deferred  tax  assets;  and  the  allocation  of  the  purchase  price  for  acquired  assets  and
businesses, including the fair value of contingent consideration. Under certain product manufacturing and
supply  agreements,  management  relies  on  estimates  for  future  returns,  rebates  and  chargebacks  made  by
the Company’s commercialization counterparties. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates
to ensure that these estimates appropriately reflect changes in the Company’s business and new information
as  it  becomes  available.  If  historical  experience  and  other  factors  used  by  management  to  make  these
estimates do not reasonably reflect future activity, the Company’s consolidated financial statements could
be materially impacted.

Fair  Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities  approximate  their  carrying  values  due  to  their  short  maturity  periods.  The  fair  value  of
acquisition-related  contingent  consideration  is  based  on  estimated  discounted  future  cash  flows  and
assessment  of  the  probability  of  occurrence  of  potential  future  events.  The  fair  values  of  marketable
securities  and  long-term  debt  are  based  on  quoted  market  prices,  if  available,  or  estimated  discounted
future cash flows.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash  and  cash  equivalents  include  certificates  of  deposit,  treasury  bills,  certain  money-market  funds  and
term deposits with maturities of three  months  or less when  purchased.

F-10

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial  instruments  that  potentially  subject  the  Company  to  significant  concentrations  of  credit  risk
consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents,  marketable securities and accounts  receivable.

The  Company  invests  its  excess  cash  in  high-quality,  money  market  instruments  and  term  deposits  with
varying  maturities,  but  typically  less  than  three  months.  The  Company  maintains  its  cash  and  cash
equivalents with major financial institutions. The Company has not experienced any significant losses on its
cash or cash equivalents.

The  Company’s  accounts  receivable  primarily  represent  amounts  due  from  wholesale  distributors,  retail
pharmacies, government entities and group purchasing organizations. Outside of the U.S., concentrations of
credit risk with respect to trade receivables, which are typically unsecured, are limited due to the number of
customers using the Company’s products, as well as their dispersion across many different geographic areas.
The  Company  performs  periodic  credit  evaluations  of  customers  and  does  not  require  collateral.  The
Company  monitors  economic  conditions,  including  volatility  associated  with  international  economies,  and
related  impacts  on  the  relevant  financial  markets  and  its  business,  especially  in  light  of  sovereign  credit
issues. The credit and economic conditions within Italy, Portugal, Spain and Greece, among other members
of  the  European  Union,  have  remained  weak  in  recent  years.  These  conditions  have  increased,  and  may
continue  to  increase,  the  average  length  of  time  that  it  takes  to  collect  on  the  Company’s  accounts
receivable  outstanding  in  these  countries.  An  allowance  for  doubtful  accounts  is  maintained  for  potential
credit  losses  based  on  the  aging  of  accounts  receivable,  historical  bad  debts  experience,  and  changes  in
customer payment patterns. Accounts receivables balances are written off against the allowance when it is
probable that the receivable will not  be collected.

As  of  December  31,  2014,  the  Company’s  three  largest  U.S.  wholesaler  customers  accounted  for
approximately  one-third  of  net  trade  receivables.  In  addition,  as  of  December  31,  2014  and  2013,  the
Company’s net trade receivable balance from Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal amounted to $81.6 million
and  $84.5  million,  respectively,  of  which  the  majority  has  been  outstanding  for  less  than  90  days.  The
portion  of  the  net  trade  receivable  from  these  countries  that  is  past  due  more  than  90  days  amounted  to
$10.8 million as of December 31, 2014 and is primarily comprised of public hospitals. Based on analysis of
bad  debts  experience  and  assessment  of  historical  payment  patterns  for  such  customers,  the  Company
determined that the substantial majority of such balance was collectible and, as such, the reserve established
on  the  balance  was  not  significant.  The  Company  has  not  experienced  any  significant  losses  from
uncollectible accounts in the three-year  period ended  December  31, 2014.

Inventories

Inventories comprise raw materials, work in process, and finished goods, which are valued at the lower of
cost or market, on a first-in, first-out basis. Cost for work in process and finished goods inventories includes
materials, direct labor, and an allocation of overheads. Market for raw materials is replacement cost, and
for work in process and finished goods  is net realizable value.

The Company evaluates the carrying value of inventories on a regular basis, taking into account such factors
as historical and anticipated future sales compared with quantities on hand, the price the Company expects
to obtain for products in their respective markets compared with historical cost and the remaining shelf life
of goods on hand.

F-11

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are reported at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Costs incurred on assets
under  construction  are  capitalized  as  construction  in  progress.  Depreciation  is  calculated  using  the
straight-line  method,  commencing  when  the  assets  become  available  for  productive  use,  based  on  the
following estimated useful lives:

Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Up to 40 years
Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment on operating lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Up to 5 years
Leasehold improvements and capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lesser of term of lease or 10 years

3  - 20 years
3  - 10 years

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are reported at cost, less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets with finite lives are
amortized over their estimated useful lives. Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method based
on the following estimated useful lives:

Product brands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate brands(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Partner relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Out-licensed technology and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1  - 25 years
4 -  20 years
1 - 15 years
2 - 9 years
1 -  10 years

(1) Corporate brands useful lives shown in the table above does not include the B&L corporate trademark, which has an indefinite

useful life and is not amortizable. See note 3 ‘‘BUSINESS COMBINATIONS’’ for further information.

Divestitures of Non-core Products

The Company nets the proceeds on the divestitures of non-core products with the carrying amount of the
related assets and records a gain/loss on sale within Other (income) expense. Any contingent payments that
are potentially due to the Company as  a result of  these divestitures are recorded  when realizable.

IPR&D

The  fair  value  of  IPR&D  acquired  through  a  business  combination  is  capitalized  as  an  indefinite-lived
intangible  asset  until  the  completion  or  abandonment  of  the  related  research  and  development  activities.
When  the  related  research  and  development  is  completed,  the  asset  will  be  assigned  a  useful  life  and
amortized.

The fair value of an IPR&D intangible asset is determined using an income approach. This approach starts
with a forecast of the net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset over its estimated useful life. The
net cash flows reflect the asset’s stage of completion, the probability of technical success, the projected costs
to  complete,  expected  market  competition,  and  an  assessment  of  the  asset’s  life-cycle.  The  net  cash  flows
are  then  adjusted  to  present  value  by  applying  an  appropriate  discount  rate  that  reflects  the  risk  factors
associated with the cash flow streams.

F-12

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived  assets  with  finite  lives  are  tested  for  impairment  whenever  events  or  changes  in  circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. If indicators of impairment are present,
the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the related estimated
undiscounted  future  cash  flows  expected  to  be  derived  from  the  asset.  If  the  expected  cash  flows  are  less
than  the  carrying  value  of  the  asset,  then  the  asset  is  considered  to  be  impaired  and  its  carrying  value  is
written down to fair value, based on  the related estimated discounted future cash flows.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets, including acquired IPR&D, are tested for impairment annually or more
frequently  if  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  between  annual  tests  indicate  that  the  asset  may  be
impaired.  Impairment  losses  on  indefinite-lived  intangible  assets  are  recognized  based  solely  on  a
comparison  of  the  fair  value  of  the  asset  to  its  carrying  value,  without  consideration  of  any  recoverability
test.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of acquired businesses over the estimated fair value of
the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually
at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is the same as, or one level below,  an operating segment.

An  interim  goodwill  impairment  test  in  advance  of  the  annual  impairment  assessment  may  be  required  if
events  occur  that  indicate  an  impairment  might  be  present.  For  example,  a  substantial  decline  in  the
Company’s  market  capitalization,  unexpected  adverse  business  condition,  economic  factors  and
unanticipated  competitive  activities  may  signal  that  an  interim  impairment  test  is  needed.  Accordingly,
among other factors, the Company monitors changes in its share price between annual impairment tests to
ensure  that  its  market  capitalization  continues  to  exceed  the  carrying  value  of  its  consolidated  net  assets.
The  Company  considers  a  decline  in  its  share  price  that  corresponds  to  an  overall  deterioration  in  stock
market  conditions  to  be  less  of  an  indicator  of  goodwill  impairment  than  a  unilateral  decline  in  its  share
price  reflecting  adverse  changes  in  its  underlying  operating  performance,  cash  flows,  financial  condition,
and/or liquidity. In the event that the Company’s market capitalization does decline below its book value,
the  Company  would  consider  the  length  and  severity  of  the  decline  and  the  reason  for  the  decline  when
assessing whether potential goodwill impairment exists. The Company believes that short-term fluctuations
in share prices may not necessarily reflect underlying values.

During  the  fourth  quarter  of  2014,  the  Company  performed  its  annual  goodwill  impairment  test  and
determined that none of the goodwill associated with  its reporting  units was impaired.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred  financing  costs  are  reported  at  cost,  less  accumulated  amortization,  and  are  recorded  in  other
long-term assets. Amortization expense is  included in interest  expense.

Foreign Currency Translation

The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign operations having a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date, and at
the  average  exchange  rate  for  the  reporting  period  for  revenue  and  expense  accounts.  The  cumulative
foreign  currency  translation  adjustment  is  recorded  as  a  component  of  accumulated  other  comprehensive
income in shareholders’ equity.

F-13

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

Foreign  currency  exchange  gains  and  losses  on  transactions  occurring  in  a  currency  other  than  an
operation’s functional currency are recognized in  net income.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is realized or realizable and earned when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery
has  occurred  or  services  have  been  rendered,  the  price  to  the  customer  is  fixed  or  determinable,  and
collectibility is reasonably assured.

Product Sales

Product  sales  revenue  is  recognized  when  title  has  transferred  to  the  customer  and  the  customer  has
assumed the risks and rewards of ownership, the timing of which is based on the specific contractual terms
with each customer. In most instances, transfer of title as well as the risks and rewards of ownership occurs
upon  delivery  of  the  product  to  the  customer.  Amounts  received  from  customers  as  prepayments  for
products to be shipped in the future are recorded in deferred revenue.

Revenue  from  product  sales  is  recognized  net  of  provisions  for  estimated  discounts,  allowances,  returns,
rebates, chargebacks and distribution fees paid to certain of our wholesale customers. The Company offers
discounts  for  prompt  payment  and  other  incentive  allowances  to  customers.  Provisions  for  discounts  and
allowances  are  estimated  based  on  contractual  sales  terms  with  customers  and  historical  payment
experience. The Company allows customers to return product within a specified period of time before and
after its expiration date. Provisions for returns are estimated based on historical return levels, taking into
account additional available information on competitive products and contract changes. The Company has
data sharing agreements with the three largest wholesalers in the U.S. Where the Company does not have
data  sharing  agreements,  it  uses  third  party  data  to  estimate  the  level  of  product  inventories  and  product
demand at wholesalers and retail pharmacies. The Company reviews its methodology and adequacy of the
provision  for  returns  on  a  quarterly  basis,  adjusting  for  changes  in  assumptions,  historical  results  and
business practices, as necessary. The Company is subject to rebates on sales made under governmental and
commercial  rebate  programs,  and  chargebacks  on  sales  made  to  government  agencies,  retail  pharmacies
and  group  purchasing  organizations.  Provisions  for  rebates  and  chargebacks  are  estimated  based  on
historical experience, relevant statutes with respect to governmental pricing programs, and contractual sales
terms.

The  Company  is  party  to  manufacturing  and  supply  agreements  with  a  number  of  commercialization
counterparties  in  the  U.S.  Under  the  terms  of  these  agreements,  the  Company’s  supply  prices  for  its
products  are  determined  after  taking  into  consideration  estimates  for  future  returns,  rebates,  and
chargebacks  provided  by  each  counterparty.  The  Company  makes  adjustments  as  needed  to  state  these
estimates  on  a  basis  consistent  with  this  policy  and  its  methodology  for  estimating  returns,  rebates  and
chargebacks related to its own direct product sales.

Research and Development Expenses

Costs  related  to  internal  research  and  development  programs,  including  costs  associated  with  the
development  of  acquired  IPR&D,  are  expensed  as  goods  are  delivered  or  services  are  performed.  Under
certain research and development arrangements with third parties, the Company may be required to make
payments that are contingent on the achievement of specific developmental, regulatory and/or commercial
milestones.  Before  a  product  receives  regulatory  approval,  milestone  payments  made  to  third  parties  are

F-14

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

expensed  when  the  milestone  is  achieved.  Milestone  payments  made  to  third  parties  after  regulatory
approval is received are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the approved product.

Amounts  due  from  third  parties  as  reimbursement  of  development  activities  conducted  under  certain
research  and  development  arrangements  are  recognized  as  a  reduction  of  research  and  development
expenses.

Legal Costs

Legal fees and other costs related to litigation and other legal proceedings are expensed as incurred and are
included in Selling, general and administrative expenses. Certain legal costs associated with acquisitions are
included in Acquisition-related costs, and certain legal costs associated with divestitures, legal settlements,
and other business development activity are included in Other (income) expense or Gain on investments,
net (see note 23 titled ‘‘PS FUND 1 INVESTMENT’’), as appropriate. Legal costs expensed are reported
net of expected insurance recoveries. A claim for insurance recovery is recognized when the claim becomes
probable of realization.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs comprise product samples, print media, promotional materials and television advertising.
Advertising  costs  related  to  new  product  launches  are  expensed  on  the  first  use  of  the  advertisement.
Prepaid  advertising  costs  are  recorded  in  Prepaid  expenses  and  other  current  assets  in  the  consolidated
balance sheet and were not material  as of December 31, 2014  and 2013.

Advertising costs expensed in 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $435.4 million, $277.3 million and $157.6 million,
respectively. These costs are included  in  selling, general and administrative expenses.

Share-Based Compensation

The  Company  recognizes  all  share-based  payments  to  employees,  including  grants  of  employee  stock
options and restricted share units (‘‘RSUs’’), at estimated fair value. The Company amortizes the fair value
of  stock  option  or  RSU  grants  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the  requisite  service  period  of  the  individual
stock option or RSU grant, which generally equals the vesting period. Stock option and RSU forfeitures are
estimated  at  the  time  of  grant  and  revised,  if  necessary,  in  subsequent  periods  if  actual  forfeitures  differ
from those estimates.

Share-based  compensation  is  recorded  in  cost  of  goods  sold,  research  and  development  expenses,  selling,
general and administrative expenses  and restructuring, integration and other costs, as appropriate.

Acquisition-Related Contingent Consideration

Acquisition-related contingent consideration, which consists primarily of potential milestone payments and
royalty  obligations,  is  recorded  in  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  at  its  acquisition  date  estimated  fair
value,  in  accordance  with  the  acquisition  method  of  accounting.  The  fair  value  of  the  acquisition-related
contingent  consideration  is  remeasured  each  reporting  period,  with  changes  in  fair  value  recorded  in  the
consolidated  statements  of  income  (loss).  The  fair  value  measurement  is  based  on  significant  inputs  not
observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in fair value measurement
accounting.

F-15

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

Interest Expense

Interest expense includes standby fees and the amortization of debt discounts and deferred financing costs.
Interest  costs  are  expensed  as  incurred,  except  to  the  extent  such  interest  is  related  to  construction  in
progress, in which case interest is capitalized. The capitalized interest recorded in 2014, 2013, and 2012 was
not material.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for  the  differences  between  the  financial  statement  and  income  tax  bases  of  assets  and  liabilities,  and  for
operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided for the portion of deferred
tax assets that is more likely than not to remain unrealized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates and laws.

The  tax  benefit  from  an  uncertain  tax  position  is  recognized  only  if  it  is  more  likely  than  not  that  the  tax
position  will  be  sustained  upon  examination  by  the  appropriate  taxing  authority,  based  on  the  technical
merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized from such position are measured based on the amount
that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Liabilities associated with uncertain tax
positions  are  classified  as  long-term  unless  expected  to  be  paid  within  one  year.  Interest  and  penalties
related to uncertain tax positions, if any, are recorded in the provision for income taxes and classified with
the related liability on the consolidated balance  sheets.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. is calculated by dividing
net income attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. by the weighted-average number of
common  shares  outstanding  during  the  reporting  period.  Diluted  earnings  per  share  is  calculated  by
dividing  net  income  attributable  to  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  by  the  weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period after giving effect to dilutive potential
common shares for stock options, RSUs and convertible debt, determined using the treasury stock method.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive  income  comprises  net  income  and  other  comprehensive  income.  Other  comprehensive
income includes items such as foreign currency translation adjustments, unrealized holding gains and losses
on  available-for-sale  and  other  investments  and  certain  pension  and  other  postretirement  benefit  plan
adjustments.  Accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  is  recorded  as  a  component  of  shareholders’
equity.

Contingencies

In  the  normal  course  of  business,  the  Company  is  subject  to  loss  contingencies,  such  as  claims  and
assessments  arising  from  litigation  and  other  legal  proceedings,  contractual  indemnities,  product  and
environmental liabilities, and tax matters. Accruals for loss contingencies are recorded when the Company
determines  that  it  is  both  probable  that  a  liability  has  been  incurred  and  the  amount  of  loss  can  be
reasonably estimated. If the estimate of the amount of the loss is a range and some amount within the range
appears  to  be  a  better  estimate  than  any  other  amount  within  the  range,  that  amount  is  accrued  as  a
liability. If no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum amount of

F-16

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

the  range  is  accrued  as  a  liability.  These  accruals  are  adjusted  periodically  as  assessments  change  or
additional information becomes available.

If no accrual is made for a loss contingency because the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated, the
Company will disclose contingent liabilities when there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or an
additional loss may have been incurred.

Employee Benefit Plans

The  Company  sponsors  various  retirement  and  pension  plans,  including  defined  benefit  pension  plans,
defined  contribution  plans  and  a  participatory  defined  benefit  postretirement  plan.  The  determination  of
defined benefit pension and postretirement plan obligations and their associated expenses requires the use
of actuarial valuations to estimate the benefits employees earn while working, as well as the present value of
those benefits. Net actuarial gains and losses that exceed 10 percent of the greater of the plan’s projected
benefit obligations or the market-related value of assets are amortized to earnings over the shorter of the
estimated average future service period of the plan participants (or the estimated average future lifetime of
the  plan  participants  if  the  majority  of  plan  participants  are  inactive)  or  the  period  until  any  anticipated
final plan settlements.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (‘‘FASB’’) issued guidance to eliminate the diversity
in practice in presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax
loss,  or  a  tax  credit  carryforward  exists  at  the  reporting  date.  This  new  guidance  requires  the  netting  of
unrecognized tax benefits against a deferred tax asset for a loss or other carryforward that would apply in
settlement  of  the  uncertain  tax  positions.  Under  the  new  guidance,  unrecognized  tax  benefits  are  netted
against all available same-jurisdiction loss or other tax carryforward that would be utilized, rather than only
against  carryforwards  that  are  created  by  the  unrecognized  tax  benefits.  The  guidance  was  effective  for
reporting  periods  beginning  after  December  15,  2013.  As  this  guidance  relates  to  presentation  only,  the
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.

In April 2014, the FASB issued guidance which changes the criteria for reporting a discontinued operation
while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under the new guidance, a disposal of a component of an entity or
group of components of an entity that represents a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on
operations and financial results is a discontinued operation when any of the following occurs: (i) it meets
the criteria to be classified as held for sale, (ii) it is disposed of by sale, or (iii) it is disposed of other than by
sale. Also, a business that, on acquisition, meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale is reported in
discontinued operations. Additionally, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued
operations,  as  well  as  disclosure  of  the  pre-tax  profit  or  loss  attributable  to  a  disposal  of  an  individually
significant  component  of  an  entity  that  does  not  qualify  for  discontinued  operations  presentation.  The
Company  early  adopted  this  guidance  in  the  second  quarter  of  2014,  and  the  Company  applied  this
guidance to the divestitures described in  note 4  titled  ‘‘DIVESTITURES’’.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards, Not Adopted as of  December  31, 2014

In May 2014, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board issued converged guidance on
recognizing  revenue  from  contracts  with  customers.  The  core  principle  of  the  revenue  model  is  that  an
entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount

F-17

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

that  reflects  the  consideration  to  which  the  entity  expects  to  be  entitled  in  exchange  for  those  goods  or
services.  In  applying  the  revenue  model  to  contracts  within  its  scope,  an  entity  will:  (i)  identify  the
contract(s)  with  a  customer,  (ii)  identify  the  performance  obligations  in  the  contract,  (iii)  determine  the
transaction  price,  (iv)  allocate  the  transaction  price  to  the  performance  obligations  in  the  contract,  and
(v)  recognize  revenue  when  (or  as)  the  entity  satisfies  a  performance  obligation.  In  addition  to  these
provisions,  the  new  standard  provides  implementation  guidance  on  several  other  topics,  including  the
accounting  for  certain  revenue-related  costs,  as  well  as  enhanced  disclosure  requirements.  The  new
guidance  requires  entities  to  disclose  both  quantitative  and  qualitative  information  that  enables  users  of
financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows
arising  from  contracts  with  customers.  The  guidance  is  effective  for  annual  reporting  periods  (including
interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is not
permitted. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified approach to adopt the
guidance. The Company is evaluating the impact of adoption of this guidance on its financial position and
results of operations.

In  August  2014,  the  FASB  issued  guidance  which  requires  management  to  assess  an  entity’s  ability  to
continue  as  a  going  concern  and  to  provide  related  disclosures  in  certain  circumstances.  Under  the  new
guidance, disclosures are required when conditions give rise to substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to
continue  as  a  going  concern  within  one  year  from  the  financial  statement  issuance  date.  The  guidance  is
effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and all annual and interim periods thereafter.
Early application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have any impact on the Company’s
financial position and results of operations and, as this time, the Company does not expect any impact on its
disclosures.

In  February  2015,  the  FASB  issued  guidance  which  amends  certain  consolidation  requirements.  The  new
guidance has the following stipulations, among others: (i) eliminates the presumption that a general partner
should  consolidate  a  limited  partnership  and  eliminates  the  consolidation  model  specific  to  limited
partnerships,  (ii)  clarifies  when  fees  paid  to  a  decision  maker  should  be  a  factor  to  include  in  the
consolidation of VIEs, (iii) amends the guidance for assessing how relationships of related parties affect the
consolidation analysis of VIEs, and (iv) reduces the number of VIE consolidation models from two to one
by  eliminating  the  indefinite  deferral  for  certain  investment  funds.  The  guidance  is  effective  for  annual
reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15,
2015.  Early  application  is  permitted.  Entities  have  the  option  of  using  either  a  full  retrospective  or  a
modified retrospective approach to adopt the guidance. The Company is evaluating the impact of adoption
of this guidance on its financial position and results of operations.

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

The  Company’s  business  strategy  involves  selective  acquisitions  with  a  focus  on  core  geographies  and
therapeutic classes.

(a) Business combinations in 2014 included the following:

In the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company completed business combinations, which included the
acquisition  of  the  following  businesses,  for  an  aggregate  purchase  price  of  $1.4  billion.  The  aggregate
purchase  price  included  contingent  consideration  payment  obligations  with  an  aggregate  acquisition  date
fair value of $93.8 million.

F-18

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

(cid:127) On  July  7,  2014,  the  Company  acquired  all  of  the  outstanding  common  stock  of  PreCision
Dermatology, Inc. (‘‘PreCision’’) for an aggregate purchase price of $454.5 million. Under the terms of
the  merger  agreement,  the  Company  may  also  pay  contingent  consideration  of  $25.0  million  upon  the
achievement of a sales-based milestone. The fair value of this contingent consideration was determined to
be  nominal  as  of  the  acquisition  date,  based  on  the  sales  forecast.  As  of  December  31,  2014,  the
assumptions  used  for  determining  the  fair  value  of  contingent  consideration  have  not  changed
significantly  from  those  used  at  the  acquisition  date.  The  Company  recognized  a  post-combination
expense  of  $20.4  million  within  Other  (income)  expense  in  the  third  quarter  of  2014  related  to  the
acceleration  of  unvested  stock  options  for  PreCision  employees.  In  connection  with  the  acquisition  of
PreCision, the Company was required by the Federal Trade Commission (‘‘FTC’’) to divest the rights to
PreCision’s  Tretin-X(cid:4)  (tretinoin)  cream  product  and  PreCision’s  generic  tretinoin  gel  and  cream
products.  For  further  details,  see  note  4  titled  ‘‘DIVESTITURES’’.  PreCision  develops  and  markets  a
range  of  medical  dermatology  products,  treating  a  number  of  topical  disease  states  such  as  acne  and
atopic dermatitis with products such as Locoid(cid:4) and Clindagel(cid:4).

(cid:127) On January 23, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Solta Medical, Inc.
(‘‘Solta  Medical’’)  for  $292.5  million,  which  includes  $2.92  per  share  in  cash  and  $44.2  million  for  the
repayment  of  Solta  Medical’s  long-term  debt,  including  accrued  interest.  In  connection  with  the
acquisition,  the  Company  recognized  a  charge  of  $5.6  million  in  the  first  quarter  of  2014  relating  to  a
settlement of a pre-existing relationship with Solta Medical, which is included in Other (income) expense
in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income  (loss).  Solta  Medical  designs,  develops,  manufactures,  and
markets energy-based medical device systems for aesthetic applications. Solta Medical’s products include
the Thermage CPT(cid:4) system that provides non-invasive treatment options using radiofrequency energy for
skin  tightening,  the  Fraxel(cid:4)  repair  system  for  use  in  dermatological  procedures  requiring  ablation,
coagulation, and resurfacing of soft tissue, the Clear + Brilliant(cid:4) system to improve skin texture and help
prevent  the  signs  of  aging  skin,  and  the  Liposonix(cid:4)  system  that  destroys  unwanted  fat  cells  resulting  in
waist circumference reduction.

(cid:127) During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company completed other smaller acquisitions, including
the  consolidation  of  variable  interest  entities,  which  are  not  material  individually  or  in  the  aggregate.
These acquisitions are included in the aggregated amounts presented below.

Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

These  transactions  have  been  accounted  for  as  business  combinations  under  the  acquisition  method  of
accounting. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed related to the business combinations, in the aggregate, as of the applicable acquisition dates. The
following  recognized  amounts  related  to  the  PreCision  acquisition,  as  well  as  certain  smaller  acquisitions,
are provisional and subject to change:

(cid:127) amounts for intangible assets, property and equipment, inventories, receivables and other working capital

adjustments pending finalization of the valuation;

(cid:127) amounts for income tax assets and liabilities, pending finalization of estimates and assumptions in respect

of certain tax aspects of the transaction; and

(cid:127) amount  of  goodwill  pending  the  completion  of  the  valuation  of  the  assets  acquired  and  liabilities

assumed.

F-19

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

The  Company  will  finalize  these  amounts  as  it  obtains  the  information  necessary  to  complete  the
measurement  processes.  Any  changes  resulting  from  facts  and  circumstances  that  existed  as  of  the
acquisition  dates  may  result  in  retrospective  adjustments  to  the  provisional  amounts  recognized  at  the
acquisition  dates.  These  changes  could  be  significant.  The  Company  will  finalize  these  amounts  no  later
than one year from the respective acquisition dates.

Amounts
Recognized as of
Acquisition Dates

Measurement
Period
Adjustments(a)

Amounts
Recognized  as  of
December 31, 2014
(as adjusted)

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable(b)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets  held for sale(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net
Identifiable intangible assets, excluding  acquired

IPR&D(d)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquired IPR&D(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, including current portion . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total identifiable net assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill(f)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

33.6
87.7
125.7
170.4
19.1
58.5

697.2
65.8
4.0
(152.0)
(11.2)
(116.0)
(13.4)

969.4
(15.0)
410.4

$ (0.5)
(5.7)
—
(14.8)
(1.0)
(1.5)

23.7
(2.7)
(2.0)
(11.8)
—
22.6
(0.1)

6.2

—
(14.1)

$

33.1
82.0
125.7
155.6
18.1
57.0

720.9
63.1
2.0
(163.8)
(11.2)
(93.4)
(13.5)

975.6
(15.0)
396.3

Total fair value of consideration transferred . . . . . . . .

$1,364.8

$ (7.9)

$1,356.9

(a) The  measurement  period  adjustments  primarily  reflect:  (i)  a  decrease  in  the  net  deferred  tax  liability  primarily  related  to  the
PreCision and Solta Medical acquisitions, (ii) increases in the estimated fair value of intangible assets for the Solta Medical and
other  smaller  acquisitions,  and  (iii)  reductions  in  the  estimated  fair  value  of  inventory  for  Solta  Medical  and  other  smaller
acquisitions.  The  measurement  period  adjustments  were  made  to  reflect  facts  and  circumstances  existing  as  of  the  acquisition
date, and did not result from intervening events subsequent to the acquisition date. These adjustments did not have a significant
impact  on  the  Company’s  previously  reported  consolidated  financial  statements  and,  therefore,  the  Company  has  not
retrospectively adjusted those financial statements.

(b) The fair value of trade accounts receivable acquired was $82.0 million, with the gross contractual amount being $88.2 million, of

which  the Company expects that $6.2 million will  be  uncollectible.

(c) Assets held for sale relate to the divestitures of the Tretin-X(cid:4) product rights and the product rights for the generic tretinoin gel
and cream products acquired in the PreCision acquisition. See note 4 titled ‘‘DIVESTITURES’’ for further information.

F-20

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

(d) The following table summarizes the provisional amounts  and  useful lives assigned to identifiable intangible assets:

Weighted-
Average
Useful Lives
(Years)

Amounts

Recognized as of Measurement

Acquisition
Dates

Period
Adjustments

Amounts
Recognized  as of
December 31,  2014
(as adjusted)

Product brands
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate brand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In-licensed products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Partner  relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total identifiable intangible assets acquired . . . . .

10
8
15
8
9
9

10

$506.0
95.2
28.9
1.5
37.5
28.1

$697.2

$22.8
(0.9)
1.7
0.1
—
—

$23.7

$528.8
94.3
30.6
1.6
37.5
28.1

$720.9

(e) The  acquired IPR&D assets primarily relate to  programs from smaller acquisitions. In addition, the Solta Medical acquisition

includes a program for the development of a next generation Thermage(cid:4) product.

(f)

The goodwill relates primarily to the PreCision and Solta Medical acquisitions. Goodwill is calculated as the difference between
the  acquisition  date  fair  value  of  the  consideration  transferred  and  the  values  assigned  to  the  assets  acquired  and  liabilities
assumed.  Substantially  all  of  the  goodwill  is  not  expected  to  be  deductible  for  tax  purposes.  The  goodwill  recorded  from  the
PreCision and Solta Medical acquisitions represents the following:

(cid:127) cost savings, operating synergies and other benefits expected to result from combining the operations of PreCision and Solta

Medical with those of the Company;

(cid:127) the Company’s expectation to develop and market new products  and  technology; and

(cid:127) intangible  assets  that  do  not  qualify  for  separate  recognition  (for  instance,  PreCision’s  and  Solta  Medical’s  assembled

workforce).

The  provisional  amount  of  goodwill  from  the  PreCision  acquisition  has  been  allocated  to  the  Company’s  Developed  Markets
segment ($170.5 million). The amount of goodwill from the Solta Medical acquisition has been allocated to both the Company’s
Developed Markets segment ($56.4 million) and Emerging Markets segment ($37.8 million).

Acquisition-Related Costs

The  Company  has  incurred  to  date  $5.0  million,  in  the  aggregate,  of  transaction  costs  directly  related  to
business  combinations  which  closed  in  2014,  which  includes  expenditures  for  advisory,  legal,  valuation,
accounting and other similar services.  These costs  have been  expensed  as acquisition-related costs.

Revenue and Net Income

The  revenues  of  these  business  combinations  for  the  period  from  the  respective  acquisition  dates  to
December 31, 2014 were $250.6 million, in the aggregate, and net income was $9.1 million, in the aggregate.
The net income includes the effects of the acquisition accounting adjustments and acquisition-related costs.

(b) Business combinations in 2013 included the following:

B&L

Description of the Transaction

On August 5, 2013, the Company acquired B&L for an aggregate purchase price equal to $8.7 billion minus
B&L’s  existing  indebtedness  for  borrowed  money  (which  was  paid  off  by  Valeant  in  accordance  with  the
terms of the Merger Agreement) and related fees and costs, minus certain of B&L’s transaction expenses,

F-21

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

minus certain payments with respect to certain cancelled B&L performance-based options (which were not
outstanding immediately prior to such effective time), plus the aggregate exercise price applicable to B&L’s
outstanding options immediately prior to such effective time, and plus certain cash amounts, all as further
described in the Merger Agreement. The B&L Acquisition was financed with debt and equity issuances (see
note  12  titled  ‘‘LONG-TERM  DEBT’’  for  additional  information).  Each  B&L  restricted  share  and  stock
option,  whether  vested  or  unvested,  that  was  outstanding  immediately  prior  to  such  effective  time,  was
cancelled and converted into the right to receive the per share merger consideration in the case of restricted
shares  or,  in  the  case  of  stock  options,  the  excess,  if  any,  of  the  per  share  merger  consideration  over  the
exercise price of such stock option.

Fair Value of Consideration Transferred

The following table indicates the consideration  transferred to effect the B&L Acquisition:

Enterprise value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjusted for the following:

B&L’s outstanding debt, including accrued interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B&L’s company expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment  in B&L’s performance-based  option(a)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment  for B&L’s cash balance(b)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional cash payment(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Equity purchase price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Cash consideration paid for B&L’s unvested stock  options(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fair Value

$ 8,700.0

(4,248.3)
(6.4)
(48.5)
149.0
75.0
(3.2)

4,617.6
(4.3)

Total fair value of consideration transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4,613.3

(a) The  cash  consideration  paid  for  previously  cancelled  B&L’s  performance-based  options  was  recognized  as  a  post-combination

expense  within Other (income) expense in the third quarter of  2013.

(b) As defined in the Merger Agreement.

(c) The  cash  consideration  paid  for  B&L  stock  options  and  restricted  stock  attributable  to  pre-combination  services  has  been
included  as  a  component  of  purchase  price.  The  remaining  $4.3  million  balance  related  to  the  acceleration  of  unvested  stock
options for B&L employees was recognized as a post-combination expense within Other (income) expense in the third quarter of
2013.

F-22

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

The  transaction  has  been  accounted  for  as  a  business  combination  under  the  acquisition  method  of
accounting. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of acquisition date.

Amounts
Recognized as of
Acquisition Date Measurement

(as previously
reported)

Period
Adjustments(a)

Amounts
Recognized  as  of
December 31, 2014
(as adjusted)

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable(b)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Identifiable intangible assets, excluding  acquired

IPR&D(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquired IPR&D(f)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, including current portion(g)
. . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes, net(h) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current liabilities(i) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total identifiable net assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interest(j)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill(k)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 209.5
547.9
675.8
146.6
761.4

4,316.1
398.1
58.8
(885.6)
(4,209.9)
(1,410.9)
(280.2)

327.6
(102.3)
4,388.0

$(31.4)
(7.2)
(34.0)
0.3
33.2

17.3
17.0
(1.9)
2.1

—
36.0
(1.0)

30.4
(0.4)
(30.0)

Total fair value of consideration transferred . . . . . . . . .

$4,613.3

$ —

$ 178.1
540.7
641.8
146.9
794.6

4,333.4
415.1
56.9
(883.5)
(4,209.9)
(1,374.9)
(281.2)

358.0
(102.7)
4,358.0

$4,613.3

(a) The  measurement  period  adjustments  primarily  reflect:  (i)  a  decrease  in  the  net  deferred  tax  liability,  (ii)  a  reduction  in  the
estimated fair value of inventory, (iii) an increase in the estimated fair value of property, plant and equipment mainly related to
certain  machinery  and  equipment  in  Western  Europe  and  the  U.S.,  partially  offset  by  a  reduction  in  the  estimated  fair  value
related  to  certain  manufacturing  facilities  and  an  office  building,  (iv)  an  adjustment  between  cash  and  accounts  payable,  and
(v) increases in the estimated fair value of intangible assets, which included a net increase to IPR&D assets driven by a higher
fair value for the next generation silicone hydrogel lens (Bausch + Lomb Ultra(cid:4)). The measurement period adjustments were
made to reflect facts and circumstances existing as of the acquisition date, and did not result from intervening events subsequent
to the acquisition date. These adjustments did not have a significant impact on the Company’s previously reported consolidated
financial statements and, therefore, the Company  has not retrospectively adjusted those financial statements.

(b) The fair value of trade accounts receivable acquired was $540.7 million, with the gross contractual amount being $555.6 million,

of  which the Company expects that $14.9 million will  be  uncollectible.

(c)

Includes an estimated fair value adjustment to inventory of  $269.1 million.

F-23

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

(d) The following table summarizes the amounts  and  useful lives  assigned to property, plant and equipment:

Weighted-
Average
Useful Lives
(Years)

Amounts
Recognized as of
Acquisition Date Measurement

(as previously
reported)

Period
Adjustments

Amounts
Recognized  as of
December 31,  2014
(as adjusted)

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment on operating lease . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress

Total property, plant and equipment acquired . . .

NA
24
5
5
3
NA

$ 47.4
273.1
273.5
22.5
13.8
131.1

$761.4

$(12.6)
(23.8)
76.3
(0.3)
(0.2)
(6.2)

$ 33.2

$ 34.8
249.3
349.8
22.2
13.6
124.9

$794.6

The Company sold an office building in Rochester, New York, with an adjusted carrying amount of $14.2 million, in the third
quarter of 2014. There was no gain or loss associated with the sale.

(e) The  following table summarizes the amounts and useful  lives assigned to identifiable intangible assets:

Weighted-
Average
Useful Lives
(Years)

Amounts
Recognized as of
Acquisition Date Measurement

(as previously
reported)

Period
Adjustments

Amounts
Recognized  as of
December 31,  2014
(as adjusted)

Product brands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product rights
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate brand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10
8
Indefinite

Total identifiable intangible assets acquired . . . .

9

$1,770.2
855.4
1,690.5

$4,316.1

$ 4.6
5.7
7.0

$17.3

$1,774.8
861.1
1,697.5

$4,333.4

The corporate brand represents the B&L corporate trademark and has an indefinite useful life as there are no legal, regulatory,
contractual, competitive, economic, or other factors that limit the useful life of this intangible asset. The estimated fair value was
determined using the relief from royalty method.

(f)

The significant components of the acquired IPR&D assets primarily relate to the development of (i) various vision care products
($223.4  million  in  the  aggregate),  such  as  the  next  generation  silicone  hydrogel  lens  (Bausch  +  Lomb  Ultra(cid:4)),  (ii)  various
pharmaceutical products ($170.9 million, in the aggregate), such as latanoprostene bunod, a nitric oxide-donating prostaglandin
for  reduction  of  elevated  intraocular  pressure  in  patients  with  glaucoma  or  ocular  hypertension,  and  (iii)  various  surgical
products  ($20.8  million,  in  the  aggregate).  See  note  21  titled  ‘‘COMMITMENTS  AND  CONTINGENCIES’’  for  further
information related to the worldwide licensing agreement with NicOx, S.A. (‘‘NicOx’’) for latanoprostene bunod. A multi-period
excess earnings methodology (income approach) was used to determine the estimated fair values of the acquired IPR&D assets
from market participant perspective. The projected cash flows from these assets were adjusted for the probabilities of successful
development  and  commercialization  of  each  project,  and  a  risk-adjusted  discount  rate  of  10%  was  used  to  present  value  the
projected cash flows. In determining fair value for latanoprostene bunod and Bausch + Lomb Ultra(cid:4), the Company assumed, as
of  the  acquisition  date,  that  material  cash  inflows  for  these  products  would  commence  in  2016  and  2014,  respectively.  In
September  2013,  the  U.S.  Food  and  Drug  Administration  (‘‘FDA’’)  approved  Bausch  +  Lomb  Ultra(cid:4),  and  the  product  was
launched  in  February  2014.  As  of  December  31,  2014,  the  Company  estimated  that  it  will  incur  remaining  development  costs,
including  certain  milestone  payments,  of  approximately  $80  million,  in  the  aggregate,  to  complete  the  development  of  the
IPR&D assets.

(g)

In 2013, the Company repaid in full the amounts outstanding, with the exception of certain debentures. In connection with the
redemption of the assumed 9.875% senior notes, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $8.2 million in the
third quarter of 2013. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the debentures have an outstanding balance of $11.8 million, in the
aggregate.

(h) Comprises current net deferred tax assets ($61.6 million)  and  non-current net deferred tax liabilities ($1,436.5 million).

F-24

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

(i)

Includes $224.2 million related to the estimated fair  value of pension and other benefits liabilities.

(j) Represents the estimated fair value of B&L’s noncontrolling interest related primarily to Chinese joint ventures. A discounted

cash flow methodology was used to determine the estimated fair  values as of the acquisition date.

(k) Goodwill is calculated as the difference between the acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred and the values
assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The
goodwill  recorded represents the following:

(cid:127) the Company’s expectation to develop and market new product brands, product lines and technology;

(cid:127) cost savings and operating synergies expected to result from combining the operations of B&L with those of the Company;

(cid:127) the value of the continuing operations of B&L’s existing business (that is, the higher rate of return on the assembled net assets

versus if the Company had acquired all of  the net assets separately); and

(cid:127) intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition (for instance, B&L’s assembled workforce).

The amount of goodwill has been allocated to the Company’s Developed Markets segment ($3.3 billion) and Emerging Markets
segment ($1.1 billion).

Other Business Combinations

Description of the Transactions

In  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013,  the  Company  completed  other  business  combinations,  which
included the acquisition of the following businesses, for an aggregate purchase price of $898.1 million. The
aggregate  purchase  price  included  contingent  consideration  payment  obligations  with  an  aggregate
acquisition date fair value of $59.1 million.

(cid:127) On April 25, 2013, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Obagi Medical Products, Inc.
(‘‘Obagi’’) at a price of $24.00 per share in cash. The aggregate purchase price paid by the Company was
approximately $437.1 million. Obagi is a specialty pharmaceutical company that develops, markets, and
sells topical aesthetic and therapeutic skin-health systems with a product portfolio of dermatology brands
including  Obagi  Nu-Derm(cid:4),  Condition  &  Enhance(cid:4),  Obagi-C(cid:4)  Rx,  ELASTIDerm(cid:4)  and  Obagi
CLENZIDerm(cid:4).

(cid:127) On  February  1,  2013,  the  Company  acquired  Natur  Produkt  International,  JSC  (‘‘Natur  Produkt’’),  a
specialty  pharmaceutical  company  in  Russia,  for  a  purchase  price  of  $149.9  million,  including  a
$20.0 million contingent refund of purchase price relating to the outcome of certain litigation involving
AntiGrippin(cid:4) that commenced prior to the acquisition. Subsequent to the acquisition, during the three-
month period ended March 31, 2013, the litigation was resolved, and the $20.0 million was refunded back
to  the  Company.  Natur  Produkt’s  key  brand  products  include  AntiGrippin(cid:4),  Anti-Angin(cid:4),  Sage(cid:5)  and
Eucalyptus MA(cid:5).

(cid:127) During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company completed other smaller acquisitions which are
not material individually or in the aggregate. These acquisitions are included in the aggregated amounts
presented below.

F-25

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

These  transactions  have  been  accounted  for  as  business  combinations  under  the  acquisition  method  of
accounting. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed related to the business combinations, in  the aggregate, as of the applicable acquisition dates.

Amounts
Recognized as of
Acquisition Dates

Measurement
Period
Adjustments(a)

Amounts
Recognized as  of
December 31, 2014
(as adjusted)

Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable(b)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Identifiable intangible assets, excluding  acquired

IPR&D(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquired IPR&D(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Indemnification assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings(e)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt(e)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax liability, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total identifiable net assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interest(f)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill(g)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 43.1
64.0
33.6
14.0
13.9

722.9
18.7
3.2
0.2
(36.2)
(33.3)
(24.0)
(147.8)
(1.5)

670.8
(11.2)
224.3

$ —

0.5
1.9
—
(3.3)

3.9
0.2
(0.7)
3.7
(0.4)
0.5
—
(1.1)
—

5.2
—
9.0

$ 43.1
64.5
35.5
14.0
10.6

726.8
18.9
2.5
3.9
(36.6)
(32.8)
(24.0)
(148.9)
(1.5)

676.0
(11.2)
233.3

Total fair value of consideration transferred . . . . . . . .

$ 883.9

$14.2

$ 898.1

(a) The  measurement  period  adjustments  primarily  reflect  an  increase  in  the  total  fair  value  of  consideration  transferred  with
respect to the Natur Produkt acquisition pursuant to a purchase price adjustment. The measurement period adjustments were
made to reflect facts and circumstances existing as of the acquisition date, and did not result from intervening events subsequent
to the acquisition date. These adjustments did not have a significant impact on the Company’s previously reported consolidated
financial statements and, therefore, the Company  has not retrospectively adjusted those financial statements.

(b) The fair value of trade accounts receivable acquired was $64.5 million, with the gross contractual amount being $68.2 million, of

which  the Company expects that $3.7 million will  be  uncollectible.

F-26

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

(c) The  following table summarizes the amounts and useful  lives assigned to identifiable intangible assets:

Weighted-
Average
Useful Lives
(Years)

Amounts

Recognized as of Measurement

Acquisition
Dates

Period
Adjustments

Amounts
Recognized  as of
December 31,  2014
(as adjusted)

Product brands
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate brand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Patents
Royalty Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Partner  relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total identifiable intangible assets acquired . . . . .

7
13
3
5
5
10

8

$517.2
86.1
71.7
26.5
16.0
5.4

$722.9

$ 3.1
0.8
—
—
—
—

$ 3.9

$520.3
86.9
71.7
26.5
16.0
5.4

$726.8

(d) The acquired IPR&D assets relate to the Obagi and Natur Produkt acquisitions. Obagi’s acquired IPR&D assets primarily relate
to  the  development  of  dermatology  products  for  anti-aging  and  suncare.  Natur  Produkt’s  acquired  IPR&D  assets  include  a
product  indicated  for  the  prevention  of  viral  diseases,  specifically  cold  and  flu,  and  a  product  indicated  for  the  treatment  of
inflammation and muscular disorders.

(e)

Short-term  borrowings  and  long-term  debt  primarily  relate  to  the  Natur  Produkt  acquisition.  In  March  2013,  the  Company
settled all of Natur Produkt’s outstanding third party short-term  borrowings and long-term debt.

(f) Represents the estimated fair value of noncontrolling interest related to a smaller acquisition completed in the third quarter of

2013.

(g) The goodwill relates primarily to the Obagi and Natur Produkt acquisitions. Goodwill is calculated as the difference between the
acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred and the values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
None  of  Obagi’s  and  Natur  Produkt’s  goodwill  is  expected  to  be  deductible  for  tax  purposes.  The  goodwill  recorded  from  the
Obagi and the Natur Produkt acquisitions represents primarily the cost savings, operating synergies and other benefits expected
to result from combining the operations with those  of the Company.

The amount of goodwill from the Obagi acquisition has been allocated primarily to the Company’s Developed Markets segment.
The amount of goodwill from the Natur Produkt acquisition has been allocated to the Company’s Emerging Markets segment.

(c) Business combinations in 2012 included  the  following:

Medicis

Description of the Transaction

On December 11, 2012, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Medicis for $44.00
per share (‘‘Medicis Per Share Consideration’’) for cash. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated September 2, 2012, among the Company, the Company’s subsidiary Valeant, Merlin Merger Sub, Inc.
(‘‘Merlin Merger Sub’’), a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Valeant, and Medicis, on
December  11,  2012,  Merlin  Merger  Sub  merged  with  and  into  Medicis,  with  Medicis  continuing  as  the
surviving entity and wholly-owned subsidiary  of  Valeant (the ‘‘Medicis acquisition’’).

Medicis  offers  a  broad  range  of  products  addressing  various  conditions  or  aesthetics  improvements,
including  acne,  actinic  keratosis,  facial  wrinkles,  glabellar  lines,  fungal  infections,  hyperpigmentation,
photoaging, psoriasis, bronchospasms, external genital and perianal warts/condyloma acuminate, seborrheic
dermatitis and cosmesis (improvement in the texture and appearance of skin). Medicis’ primary brands are
Solodyn(cid:4), Ziana(cid:4), and Zyclara(cid:4).

F-27

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

Fair Value of Consideration Transferred

The following table indicates the consideration  transferred to effect the acquisition of Medicis:

(Number  of shares, stock options and restricted
share units in millions)

Conversion
Calculation

Fair
Value

Number of common shares of Medicis  outstanding as of acquisition  date . . . . . . .
Multiplied by Medicis Per Share Consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of stock options of Medicis  cancelled and  exchanged for cash(a)
Number of outstanding restricted shares cancelled and exchanged for  cash(a)

. . . . . . .
. . . .

57.1
$44.00

3.2
2.0

Total fair value of consideration transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,513.9

33.1
31.9

$2,578.9

(a) The  cash  consideration  paid  for  Medicis  stock  options  and  restricted  shares  attributable  to  pre-combination  services  has  been
included as a component of purchase price. The remaining $77.3 million balance related to the acceleration of unvested stock
options, restricted stock awards, and share appreciation rights for Medicis employees that was triggered by the change in control
was recognized as a post-combination expense within Other  (income) expense in the fourth quarter of 2012.

F-28

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

The  transaction  has  been  accounted  for  as  business  combination  under  the  acquisition  method  of
accounting. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the acquisition date.

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories(c)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term and long-term investments(d) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Identifiable intangible assets, excluding  acquired

IPR&D(e)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquired IPR&D(f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, including current portion(g) . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total identifiable net assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill(h) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Amounts
Recognized as of
Acquisition Date
(as previously
reported)

$ 169.6
81.1
145.1
626.6
40.4
74.6
8.2

1,390.7
153.8
0.6
(453.8)
(778.0)
(205.0)
(8.8)

1,245.1
1,333.8

Measurement
Period
Adjustments(a)

$ —

9.1
(7.6)
—
—
—
(5.6)

(21.8)
6.0

—
(12.5)
—
12.2
—

(20.2)
20.2

Amounts
Recognized as  of
December 31, 2013
(as adjusted)

$ 169.6
90.2
137.5
626.6
40.4
74.6
2.6

1,368.9
159.8
0.6
(466.3)
(778.0)
(192.8)
(8.8)

1,224.9
1,354.0

Total fair value of consideration transferred . . . . . . . . .

$2,578.9

$ —

$2,578.9

(a) The measurement period adjustments primarily reflect: (i) reductions in the estimated fair value of a product brand intangible
asset and property and equipment; (ii) changes in estimated inventory reserves; (iii) changes in certain assumptions impacting
the fair value of acquired IPR&D; (iv) additional information obtained with respect to the valuation of certain pre-acquisition
contingent assets, as well as legal and milestone obligations; and (v) the tax impact of pre-tax measurement period adjustments.
The measurement period adjustments were made to reflect facts and circumstances existing as of the acquisition date, and did
not result from intervening events subsequent to the acquisition date. These adjustments did not have a significant impact on the
Company’s previously reported consolidated financial statements and, therefore, the Company has not retrospectively adjusted
those financial statements.

(b) The fair value of trade accounts receivable acquired was $90.2 million, with the gross contractual amount being $90.3 million, of

which  the Company expects that $0.1 million will  be  uncollectible.

(c)

Includes an estimated fair value adjustment to inventory of  $104.6 million.

(d)

Short-term  and  long-term  investments  consist  of  corporate  and  various  government  agency  and  municipal  debt  securities,
investments in auction rate floating securities (student loans), and investments in equity securities. Subsequent to the acquisition
date,  the  Company  liquidated  these  investments  for  proceeds  of  $615.4  million,  $9.0  million  and  $8.0  million  in  the  fourth
quarter of 2012, the first quarter of 2013, and the second  quarter of 2013, respectively.

F-29

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

(e) The  following table summarizes the amounts and useful  lives assigned to identifiable intangible assets:

Weighted-
Average
Useful Lives
(Years)

Amounts
Recognized as of
Acquisition Date Measurement

(as previously
reported)

Period
Adjustments

Amounts
Recognized  as of
December 31,  2013
(as adjusted)

In-licensed products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product brands
Patents
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate brands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total identifiable intangible assets acquired . . . . .

11
8
5
14

9

$ 633.4
491.6
225.0
40.7

$1,390.7

$ 2.3
(24.8)
1.1
(0.4)

$(21.8)

$ 635.7
466.8
226.1
40.3

$1,368.9

(f)

The  significant  components  of  the  acquired  IPR&D  assets  relate  to  the  development  of  dermatology  products,  such  as
Luliconazole, a new imidazole, antimycotic cream for the treatment of tinea cruris, pedis and corporis, and Metronidazole 1.3%,
a topical antibiotic for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis ($136.9 million, in the aggregate), and the development of aesthetics
programs  ($22.9  million).  In  November  2013,  the  FDA  approved  a  New  Drug  Application  (‘‘NDA’’)  for  Luliconazole,  which
triggered  the  commencement  of  amortization.  A  multi-period  excess  earnings  methodology  (income  approach)  was  primarily
used  to  determine  the  estimated  fair  values  of  the  acquired  IPR&D  assets.  The  projected  cash  flows  from  these  assets  were
adjusted for the probabilities of successful development and commercialization of each project. Risk-adjusted discount rates of
10% — 11% were used to present value the projected cash flows. On July 1, 2014, the Company sold the worldwide rights in its
Metronidazole  1.3%  Vaginal  Gel  antibiotic  development  product  to  Actavis  Specialty  Brands.  For  further  details,  see  note  4
titled ‘‘DIVESTITURES’’.

(g) During  the  period  from  the  acquisition  date  to  December  31,  2013,  the  Company  settled  a  significant  portion  of  Medicis’
outstanding  long-term  debt.  As  of  December  31,  2014  and  2013,  Medicis’  outstanding  long-term  debt  includes  1.375%
Convertible Senior Notes, with an outstanding principal amount of $0.2  million.

(h) Goodwill is calculated as the difference between the acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred and the values
assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The
goodwill  recorded represents the following:

(cid:127) cost savings, operating synergies and other benefits expected to result from combining the operations of Medicis with those of

the Company;

(cid:127) the value of the continuing operations of Medicis’ existing business (that is, the higher rate of return on the assembled net

assets versus if the Company had acquired all  of the net assets separately); and

(cid:127) intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition (for instance, Medicis’ assembled workforce).

The  goodwill has been allocated to the Company’s Developed Markets segment.

Other Business Combinations

Description of the Transactions

In  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012,  the  Company  completed  other  business  combinations,  which
included the following businesses, as well as other smaller acquisitions, for an aggregate purchase price of
$1.2 billion. The aggregate purchase price included contingent consideration obligations with an aggregate
acquisition date fair value of $145.7 million.

(cid:127) On  June  18,  2012,  the  Company  acquired  all  of  the  outstanding  common  stock  and  preferred  stock  of
OraPharma  Topco  Holdings,  Inc.  (‘‘OraPharma’’),  a  specialty  oral  health  company  located  in  the  U.S.
that  develops  and  commercializes  products  that  improve  and  maintain  oral  health.  Pursuant  to  the
Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger,  dated  June  14,  2012,  by  and  among  Valeant,  Orange  Acquisition,  Inc.
(‘‘Orange  Merger  Sub’’),  a  Delaware  corporation  and  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of  Valeant,  OraPharma

F-30

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

and  a  representative  of  the  shareholder  of  Orapharma,  Orange  Merger  Sub  merged  with  and  into
OraPharma with OraPharma continuing as the surviving entity and wholly-owned subsidiary of Valeant.
The Company made an up-front payment of $289.3 million, and the Company agreed to pay a series of
contingent consideration payments of up to $114.0 million based on certain milestones, including certain
revenue targets. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined to be $99.2 million as of
the  acquisition  date.  As  of  December  31,  2014,  the  assumptions  used  for  determining  fair  value  of  the
contingent consideration have not changed significantly from those used at the acquisition date. During
each year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company made contingent consideration payments of
$40.0 million per year, and therefore the remaining potential contingent consideration that may be paid is
$34.0 million. OraPharma’s lead product is Arestin(cid:4), a locally administered antibiotic for the treatment of
periodontitis  that  utilizes  an  advanced  controlled-release  delivery  system  and  is  indicated  for  use  in
conjunction with scaling and root planing for the treatment  of  adult periodontitis.

(cid:127) On  March  13,  2012,  the  Company  acquired  certain  assets  from  Gerot  Lannach,  a  branded  generics
pharmaceutical  company  based  in  Austria.  The  Company  made  an  up-front  payment  of  $164.0  million,
and  the  Company  agreed  to  pay  a  series  of  contingent  consideration  payments  if  certain  net  sales
milestones  were  achieved.  The  fair  value  of  the  contingent  consideration  was  determined  to  be
$16.8 million as of the acquisition date. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company made
contingent consideration payments of $20.1 million, in the aggregate. There are no remaining contingent
consideration  payments  under  this  arrangement.  As  part  of  the  transaction,  the  Company  also  entered
into a ten-year exclusive supply agreement with Gerot Lannach for the acquired products. Approximately
90% of sales relating to the acquired assets are in Russia, with sales also made in certain Commonwealth
of  Independent  States  (CIS)  countries  including  Kazakhstan  and  Uzbekistan.  Gerot  Lannach’s  largest
product  is acetylsalicylic acid, a low dose aspirin.

(cid:127) During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company completed other smaller acquisitions which are
not material individually or in the aggregate. These acquisitions are included in the aggregated amounts
presented below.

F-31

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

These  transactions  have  been  accounted  for  as  business  combinations  under  the  acquisition  method  of
accounting. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed related to the other business  combinations,  in the aggregate, as of the acquisition dates.

Amounts
Recognized as of
Acquisition Dates Measurement

(as previously
reported)

Period
Adjustments(a)

Amounts
Recognized  as  of
December 31,  2013
(as adjusted)

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets  held for sale(c)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment
Identifiable intangible assets, excluding  acquired

IPR&D(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquired IPR&D(e)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Indemnification assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt(f)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liability for uncertain tax position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total identifiable net assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill(g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

21.4
40.2
15.6
68.0
6.6
17.2

1,133.0
16.7
27.9
1.9
(41.8)
(38.8)
(6.7)
(28.7)
(184.8)

1,047.7
157.4

$ (0.3)
—
—
(8.8)
—
—

(62.6)
13.1
—
—
(0.7)
—

6.7

—
18.8

(33.8)
24.7

$

21.1
40.2
15.6
59.2
6.6
17.2

1,070.4
29.8
27.9
1.9
(42.5)
(38.8)
—
(28.7)
(166.0)

1,013.9
182.1

Total fair value of consideration transferred . . . . . . . . .

$1,205.1

$ (9.1)

$1,196.0

(a) The  measurement  period  adjustments  primarily  relate  to  the  OraPharma  acquisition  and  primarily  reflect:  (i)  changes  in  the
estimated fair value of the Arestin(cid:4) product brand; (ii) the reclassification of intangible assets from product brands to IPR&D;
(iii) a decrease in the total fair value of consideration transferred due to a working capital adjustment; and (iv) the tax impact of
pre-tax  measurement  period  adjustments.  The  measurement  period  adjustments  were  made  to  reflect  facts  and  circumstances
existing  as  of  the  acquisition  date,  and  did  not  result  from  intervening  events  subsequent  to  the  acquisition  date.  These
adjustments  did  not  have  a  significant  impact  on  the  Company’s  previously  reported  consolidated  financial  statements  and,
therefore, the Company has not retrospectively  adjusted those  financial statements.

(b) The fair value of trade accounts receivable acquired was $40.2 million, with the gross contractual amount being $41.5 million, of

which  the Company expects that $1.3 million will  be  uncollectible.

(c) Assets held for sale relate to a product brand acquired in the other smaller acquisition. Subsequent to that acquisition, the plan
of sale changed, and the Company no longer intends to sell the asset. Consequently, the product brand was not classified as an
asset held for sale as of December 31, 2012.

F-32

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

(d) The following table summarizes the amounts  and  useful lives  assigned to identifiable intangible assets:

Weighted-
Average
Useful Lives
(Years)

Amounts
Recognized as of
Acquisition Date Measurement

(as previously
reported)

Period
Adjustments

Amounts
Recognized  as of
December 31,  2013
(as adjusted)

Product brands
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate brands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Royalty agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Partner  relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total identifiable intangible assets acquired . . . . .

11
13
10
9
5

11

$ 903.7
51.4
109.3
36.2
32.4

$1,133.0

$(63.8)
2.1
(0.9)
—
—

$(62.6)

$ 839.9
53.5
108.4
36.2
32.4

$1,070.4

(e) The IPR&D assets primarily relate to the OraPharma acquisition. OraPharma’s acquired IPR&D assets primarily relate to the
development  of  Arestin(cid:4)  ER,  which  is  indicated  for  oral  hygiene  use  and  Arestin(cid:4)  Peri-Implantitis,  which  is  indicated  for
anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial use.

(f)

Primarily relates to the OraPharma acquisition. Effective June 18, 2012, the Company terminated the OraPharma’s credit facility
agreement, repaid the assumed debt outstanding ($37.9 million) and cancelled the undrawn credit facilities.

(g) The  goodwill  relates  primarily  to  the  OraPharma  acquisition.  Goodwill  is  calculated  as  the  difference  between  the  acquisition
date fair value of the consideration transferred and the values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. None of
OraPharma’s  goodwill  is  expected  to  be  deductible  for  tax  purposes.  The  goodwill  recorded  from  the  OraPharma  acquisition
represents the following:

(cid:127) cost  savings,  operating  synergies  and  other  benefits  expected  to  result  from  combining  the  operations  of  OraPharma  with

those of the Company;

(cid:127) the value of the continuing operations of OraPharma’s existing business (that is, the higher rate of return on the assembled

net assets versus if the Company had acquired  all of  the net assets separately); and

(cid:127) intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition (for instance, OraPharma’s assembled workforce).

The  amount  of  goodwill  from  OraPharma  acquisition  has  been  allocated  to  the  Company’s  Developed  Markets  segment.  The
amount of goodwill from the Gerot Lannach acquisition has been allocated to the Company’s Emerging Markets segment.

Pro Forma Impact of Business Combinations

The  following  table  presents  unaudited  pro  forma  consolidated  results  of  operations  for  the  years  ended
December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, as if the 2014 acquisitions had occurred as of January 1, 2013, the 2013
acquisitions had occurred as of January 1, 2012, and the 2012 acquisitions occurred as of January 1, 2011.

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals

Unaudited

2014

2013

2012

$8,348.9

$7,929.9

$7,700.6

International, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

909.3

(801.9)

(709.6)

Earnings (loss) per share attributable  to  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals

International, Inc.:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$
$

2.71
2.66

$ (2.43) $ (2.14)
$ (2.43) $ (2.14)

F-33

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued)

The increase in pro forma revenues in the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended
December  31,  2013  was  primarily  due  to  higher  B&L  revenues  and  growth  from  the  remaining  business,
including the launches of Jublia(cid:4), Luzu(cid:4), and Retin-A Micro(cid:4) Microsphere 0.08% (‘‘RAM 0.08%’’). These
increases  were  partially  offset  by  (i)  lower  sales  of  the  Vanos(cid:4),  Retin-A  Micro(cid:4)  (excluding  RAM  0.08%),
and Zovirax(cid:4) franchises and Wellbutrin(cid:4) XL (Canada) due to generic competition, (ii) lower sales of facial
aesthetic fillers and toxins assets due to the July 2014 divestiture of these assets, and (iii) a negative foreign
currency exchange impact.

The unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations were prepared using the acquisition method of
accounting  and  are  based  on  the  historical  financial  information  of  the  Company  and  the  acquired
businesses  described  above.  Except  to  the  extent  realized  in  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014,  the
unaudited pro forma information does not reflect any cost savings, operating synergies and other benefits
that the Company may achieve as a result of these acquisitions, or the costs necessary to achieve these cost
savings,  operating  synergies  and  other  benefits.  In  addition,  except  to  the  extent  recognized  in  the  year
ended December 31, 2014, the unaudited pro forma information does not reflect the costs to integrate the
operations of the Company with those  of the acquired businesses.

The  unaudited  pro  forma  information  is  not  necessarily  indicative  of  what  the  Company’s  consolidated
results of operations actually would have been had the 2014 acquisitions, the 2013 acquisitions, and the 2012
acquisitions  been  completed  on  January  1,  2013,  January  1,  2012,  and  January  1,  2011,  respectively.  In
addition, the unaudited pro forma information does not purport to project the future results of operations
of the Company. The unaudited pro forma information reflects primarily  the following adjustments:

(cid:127) elimination of historical intangible asset amortization expense of these acquisitions;

(cid:127) additional amortization expense related to the fair value of  identifiable intangible  assets acquired;

(cid:127) additional  depreciation  expense  related  to  fair  value  adjustment  to  property,  plant  and  equipment

acquired;

(cid:127) additional interest expense associated with the financing obtained by the Company in connection with the

various acquisitions; and

(cid:127) the  exclusion  from  pro  forma  earnings  in  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014,  2013  and  2012  of  the
acquisition  accounting  adjustments  on  these  acquisitions’  inventories  that  were  sold  subsequent  to  the
acquisition date of $20.2 million, $369.9 million and $58.1 million, in the aggregate, respectively, and the
acquisition-related  costs  of  $2.0  million,  $25.3  million  and  $72.1  million,  in  the  aggregate,  respectively,
incurred for these acquisitions in the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and the inclusion of
those amounts in pro forma earnings  for the  corresponding comparative  periods.

In addition, all of the above adjustments  were adjusted for the applicable tax impact.

F-34

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

4. DIVESTITURES

Divestiture of Facial Aesthetic Fillers and  Toxins
On July 10, 2014, the Company sold all rights to Restylane(cid:4), Perlane(cid:4), Emervel(cid:4), Sculptra(cid:4), and Dysport(cid:4)
owned  or  held  by  the  Company  to  Galderma  S.A.  (‘‘Galderma’’)  for  approximately  $1.4  billion  in  cash.
These  assets  were  included  primarily  in  the  Company’s  Developed  Markets  segment.  As  a  result  of  this
transaction, the Company recognized a net gain on sale of $323.9 million in the third quarter of 2014 within
Other (income) expense in the consolidated statement of income (loss). The costs to sell for this divestiture
of approximately $43 million were recognized in the third quarter of 2014 and included as part of the net
gain on sale (netted against the proceeds in the consolidated statement of cash flows). As this divestiture
does not represent a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on operations and financial results, a
discontinued operations presentation  was not appropriate.

Sale of Metronidazole 1.3%

On July 1, 2014, the Company sold the worldwide rights in its Metronidazole 1.3% Vaginal Gel antibiotic
product, a topical antibiotic for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis, to Actavis Specialty Brands for upfront
and certain milestone payments of $10.0 million, in the aggregate, and minimum royalties for the first three
years  of  commercialization.  This  asset  was  included  in  the  Company’s  Developed  Markets  segment.  In
addition, royalties are payable to the Company beyond the initial three-year commercialization period. In
the event of generic competition on Metronidazole 1.3%, should Actavis Specialty Brands choose to launch
an  authorized  generic  product,  Actavis  Specialty  Brands  would  share  the  gross  profits  of  the  authorized
generic  with  the  Company.  The  FDA  approved  the  NDA  for  Metronidazole  1.3%  in  March  2014.  In
connection with the sale of the Metronidazole 1.3%, the Company recognized a loss on sale of $58.5 million
in  the  third  quarter  of  2014,  as  the  Company’s  accounting  policy  is  to  not  recognize  contingent  payments
until  such  amounts  are  realizable.  The  loss  on  sale  was  included  within  Other  (income)  expense  in  the
consolidated statement of income (loss). As this divestiture does not represent a strategic shift that has, or
will have, a major effect on operations and financial results, a discontinued operations presentation was not
appropriate.

Divestiture of Tretin-X(cid:4) and Generic Tretinoin

In connection with the acquisition of PreCision, the Company was required by the FTC to divest the rights
to  PreCision’s  Tretin-X(cid:4)  (tretinoin)  cream  product  and  PreCision’s  generic  tretinoin  gel  and  cream
products. In July 2014, the Tretin-X product rights were sold to Watson Laboratories, Inc. for an up-front
purchase  price  of  $70  million,  and  the  generic  tretinoin  products  rights  were  sold  to  Matawan
Pharmaceuticals,  LLC  (‘‘Matawan’’)  for  an  up-front  purchase  price  of  $45  million  plus  additional
contingent  payments.  In  connection  with  the  sale  of  the  generic  tretinoin  product  rights  to  Matawan,  the
Company  recognized  a  loss  on  sale  of  $8.8  million  in  the  third  quarter  of  2014  within  Other  (income)
expense  in  the  consolidated  statement  of  income  (loss),  as  the  Company’s  accounting  policy  is  to  not
recognize contingent payments until such amounts are realizable. There was no gain or loss associated with
the sale of the Tretin-X product rights. As these divestitures do not represent strategic shifts that have or
will have, a major effect on operations and financial results, a discontinued operations presentation was not
appropriate.

Divestiture of certain skincare products  sold in  Australia

In October 2013, the Company divested certain skincare products, sold primarily in Australia, for up-front
proceeds  of  $13.7  million,  plus  potential  additional  earn-out  payments  based  on  sales  and  margin
performance during the twelve-month period following the sale transaction. In connection with the sale of

F-35

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

4. DIVESTITURES (Continued)

these  products,  the  Company  realized  $13.7  million  of  cash  proceeds  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2013.  The
Company  recognized  a  loss  on  sale  of  $10.2  million  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2013,  which  was  included  in
Other  (income)  expense  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income  (loss),  since  the  Company  will  not
recognize income from the potential earn-out payments until realizable. For further information regarding
this  transaction, see note 6 titled ‘‘FAIR  VALUE MEASUREMENTS’’.

Divestitures of IDP-111 and 5-FU

In connection with the acquisition of the Dermik in 2011, the Company was required by the FTC to divest
IDP-111, a generic version of BenzaClin(cid:4), and 5-FU, an authorized generic of Efudex(cid:4). In February 2012,
the  Company  sold  the  IDP-111  and  5-FU  products  and  realized  $66.3  million  of  cash  proceeds,  which
resulted in an immaterial loss on sale.

5. RESTRUCTURING, INTEGRATION AND OTHER  CHARGES

In connection with the B&L and Medicis acquisitions as well as other smaller acquisitions, the Company has
implemented  cost-rationalization  and  integration  initiatives  to  capture  operating  synergies  and  generate
cost savings across the Company. These measures  included:

(cid:127) workforce reductions across the Company and  other organizational  changes;

(cid:127) closing  of  duplicative  facilities  and  other  site  rationalization  actions  company-wide,  including  research

and development facilities, sales offices and corporate facilities;

(cid:127) leveraging research and development  spend; and

(cid:127) procurement savings.

B&L Acquisition-Related Cost-Rationalization  and Integration Initiatives

The  Company  estimates  that  it  will  incur  total  costs  of  approximately  $600  million  (excluding  charges  of
$52.8  million  described  below)  in  connection  with  these  cost-rationalization  and  integration  initiatives,
which  were  substantially  completed  by  the  end  of  2014.  Since  the  acquisition  date,  total  costs  of
$569.1  million  (including  $55.9  million  related  to  cost-rationalization  measures  at  a  contact  lens
manufacturing plant in Waterford, Ireland as described below) have been incurred through December 31,
2014, including (i) $306.9 million of restructuring expenses, (ii) $248.8 million of integration expenses, and
(iii) $13.4 million of acquisition-related costs. The estimate of total costs to be incurred primarily includes:
employee termination costs payable to approximately 3,000 employees of the Company and B&L who have
been  or  will  be  terminated  as  a  result  of  the  B&L  Acquisition;  IPR&D  termination  costs  related  to  the
transfer  to  other  parties  of  product-development  programs  that  did  not  align  with  our  research  and
development  model;  costs  to  consolidate  or  close  facilities  and  relocate  employees;  and  contract
termination and lease cancellation costs. The costs described above do not include charges of $52.8 million,
in  the  aggregate,  recognized  and  paid  in  the  third  quarter  of  2013  related  to  B&L’s  previously  cancelled
performance-based options and the acceleration of unvested stock options for B&L employees as a result of
the  B&L  Acquisition.  As  described  in  note  2  titled  ‘‘SIGNIFICANT  ACCOUNTING  POLICIES’’,  the
charges  of  $52.8  million  were  reclassified  to  Other  (income)  expense  to  conform  to  the  current  year
presentation.

F-36

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

5. RESTRUCTURING, INTEGRATION AND OTHER  CHARGES  (Continued)

B&L Restructuring Costs

The  following  table  summarizes  the  major  components  of  the  restructuring  costs  incurred  in  connection
with the B&L Acquisition since the acquisition date through December 31,  2014:

Employee Termination Costs

Severance and
Related Benefits

Share-Based
Compensation(1)

IPR&D
Termination
Costs

Contract
Termination,
Facility Closure
and Other Costs

$ —

$ —

Balance, January 1, 2013 . . . . . . .
Costs incurred and/or charged to

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash adjustments . . . . . . . . .

Balance, December 31, 2013 . . . .
Costs incurred and charged to

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash adjustments . . . . . . . . .

155.7
(77.8)
11.4

$ 89.3

46.0
(110.7)
(5.7)

Balance, December 31, 2014 . . . .

$ 18.9

$—

—
—
—

$—

—
—
—

$—

52.8
(52.8)
—

$ —

—
—
—

$ —

$ —

25.6
(7.8)
(6.8)

Total

$ —

234.1
(138.4)
4.6

$ 11.0

$ 100.3

23.7
(24.9)
(5.4)

69.7
(135.6)
(11.1)

$ 4.4

$ 23.3

(1) Relates  to  B&L’s  previously  cancelled  performance-based  options  and  the  acceleration  of  unvested  stock  options  for  B&L
employees  as  a  result  of  the  B&L  Acquisition.  These  charges  were  reclassified  to  Other  (income)  expense  to  conform  to  the
current  year presentation.

B&L Integration Costs

As  mentioned  above,  the  Company  has  incurred  $248.8  million  of  integration  costs  related  to  the  B&L
Acquisition  since  the  acquisition  date.  In  the  years  ended  December  31,  2014  and  2013,  the  Company
incurred $132.8 million and $116.0 million, respectively, of integration costs related to the B&L Acquisition,
which related primarily to integration consulting and manufacturing, duplicate labor, transition service, and
other costs. The Company made payments of $144.1 million and $102.2 million related to B&L integration
costs for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

In addition to the restructuring and integration costs described above, the Company incurred $55.9 million
of  restructuring  costs  in  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014  related  to  employee  termination  costs  with
respect  to  cost-rationalization  measures  at  a  contact  lens  manufacturing  plant  in  Waterford,  Ireland  (the
plant was acquired as part of the B&L Acquisition). The Company made payments of $24.0 million in the
year ended December 31, 2014 with respect to this initiative.

Medicis Acquisition-Related Cost-Rationalization and Integration  Initiatives

The Company estimates that it will incur total costs of approximately $200 million in connection with these
cost-rationalization  and  integration  initiatives,  which  were  substantially  completed  by  the  end  of  2013.
However,  additional  costs  have  been  incurred  in  2014,  and  the  Company  expects  to  incur  certain  costs
during the next three months. Since the acquisition date, total costs of $193.2 million (excluding the charge
of $77.3 million described below), including (i) $109.2 million of restructuring expenses, (ii) $51.8 million of
integration  expenses,  and  (iii)  $32.2  million  of  acquisition-related  costs,  which  excludes  $24.2  million  of
acquisition-related  costs  recognized  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2012  related  to  royalties  to  be  paid  to

F-37

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

5. RESTRUCTURING, INTEGRATION AND OTHER  CHARGES  (Continued)

Galderma  on  sales  of  Sculptra(cid:4),  have  been  incurred  through  December  31,  2014.  In  connection  with  the
divestiture of Sculptra(cid:4) and certain other products to Galderma in July 2014, the royalty obligation owed to
Galderma on sales of Sculptra(cid:4) was relieved in the third quarter of 2014 and included as part of the gain on
sale.  See  note  4  ‘‘DIVESTITURES’’  for  additional  information  regarding  this  divestiture.  The  estimated
costs  primarily  include:  employee  termination  costs  payable  to  approximately  750  employees  of  the
Company  and  Medicis  who  have  been  terminated  as  a  result  of  the  Medicis  acquisition;  IPR&D
termination  costs  related  to  the  transfer  to  other  parties  of  product-development  programs  that  did  not
align  with  our  research  and  development  model;  costs  to  consolidate  or  close  facilities  and  relocate
employees; and contract termination and lease cancellation costs. The estimate of total costs to be incurred
of approximately $200 million does not include a charge of $77.3 million recognized within Other (income)
expense  and  paid  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2012  related  to  the  acceleration  of  unvested  stock  options,
restricted  stock  awards,  and  share  appreciation  rights  for  Medicis  employees  that  was  triggered  by  the
change in control.

Medicis Restructuring Costs

The following table summarizes the major components of the $109.2 million of restructuring costs incurred
in connection with the Medicis acquisition since  the acquisition date  through December  31, 2014:

Balance, January  1, 2012 . . . . . . . .
Costs incurred  and/or  charged to

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash adjustments

Balance, December  31, 2012 . . . . . .
Costs incurred  and/or  charged to

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash adjustments

Employee Termination Costs

Severance and
Related Benefits

Share-Based
Compensation(1)

IPR&D
Termination
Costs

Contract
Termination,
Facility Closure
and Other Costs

$ —

$ —

$—

$—

85.3
(78.0)
4.1

11.4

20.0
(31.4)
0.3

77.3
(77.3)
—

—

—
—
—

—
—
—

—

—
—
—

0.4
—
(0.2)

0.2

3.5
(3.6)
(0.1)

Total

$ —

163.0
(155.3)
3.9

11.6

23.5
(35.0)
0.2

Balance, December  31, 2013(2)

. . . .

$ 0.3

$ —

$—

$—

$

0.3

(1) Relates  to  the  acceleration  of  unvested  stock  options,  restricted  stock  awards,  and  share  appreciation  rights  for  Medicis
employees that was triggered by the change in control. These charges were reclassified to Other (income) expense to conform to
the current year presentation.

(2) The  Company  has  not  recognized  any  restructuring  charges,  and  made  a  payment  of  $0.1  million,  in  the  year  ended

December 31, 2014 with respect to the Medicis acquisition-related initiatives.

Medicis Integration Costs

As  mentioned  above,  the  Company  has  incurred  $51.8  million  of  integration  costs  related  to  the  Medicis
acquisition since the acquisition date. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company
incurred  $11.9  million,  $38.4  million  and  $1.5  million,  respectively,  of  integration  costs  related  to  the
Medicis acquisition. The costs incurred in 2014 related primarily to an R&D collaboration inherited from
Medicis which does not align with the Company’s research and development model. The costs incurred in

F-38

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

5. RESTRUCTURING, INTEGRATION AND OTHER  CHARGES  (Continued)

2013  related  primarily  to  integration  consulting,  duplicate  labor,  transition  service,  and  other  costs.  The
Company  made  payments  of  $12.0  million,  $38.5  million  and  $0.5  million  related  to  Medicis  integration
costs for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013  and 2012, respectively.

Other Restructuring and Integration-Related Costs (Excluding  B&L  and Medicis)

In the year ended December 31, 2014, in addition to the restructuring and integration costs associated with
the B&L and Medicis acquisitions described above, the Company incurred an additional $111.4 million of
other restructuring, integration-related and other costs. These costs included (i) $67.8 million of integration
consulting,  duplicate  labor,  transition  service,  and  other  costs,  (ii)  $25.0  million  of  severance  costs,
(iii) $11.7 million of facility closure costs, and (iv) $6.9 million of other costs. These costs primarily related
to  (i)  integration  and  restructuring  costs  for  Solta  Medical,  PreCision  and  other  smaller  acquisitions  and
(ii) intellectual property migration and the global consolidation of the Company’s manufacturing facilities.
The Company made payments of $104.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2014 (in addition to
the payments related to the B&L and Medicis acquisitions described above).

In the year ended December 31, 2013, in addition to the restructuring and integration costs associated with
the B&L and Medicis acquisitions described above, the Company incurred an additional $102.8 million of
other  restructuring,  integration-related  and  other  costs.  These  costs  included  (i)  $39.1  million  of  facility
closure costs, (ii) $35.8 million of integration consulting, duplicate labor, transition service, and other costs,
(iii)  $15.1  million  of  severance  costs,  and  (iv)  $12.8  million  of  other  costs,  including  non-personnel
manufacturing integration costs. These costs primarily related to (i) integration and restructuring costs for
other  smaller  acquisitions,  (ii)  intellectual  property  migration  and  the  global  consolidation  of  the
Company’s manufacturing facilities, and (iii) systems integration initiatives. The Company made payments
of  $103.3  million  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013  (in  addition  to  the  payments  related  to  B&L
and Medicis acquisitions described above).

In the year ended December 31, 2012, in addition to the restructuring and integration costs associated with
the  Medicis  acquisition  described  above,  the  Company  incurred  an  additional  $179.9  million  of  other
restructuring, integration-related and other costs, in the aggregate, including (i) $72.0 million of integration
consulting,  duplicate 
labor,  transition  service,  and  other,  (ii)  $59.2  million  of  severance  costs,
(iii)  $30.4  million  of  facility  closure  costs,  and  (iv)  $18.3  million  of  other  costs,  including  non-personnel
manufacturing integration costs. The Company also made payments of $173.6 million during the year ended
December 31, 2012 (in addition to the payments related  to  the Medicis acquisition described above).

As described in note 22 titled ‘‘SEGMENT INFORMATION’’, restructuring costs are not recorded in the
Company’s reportable segments.

6.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value measurements are estimated based on  valuation  techniques and inputs categorized as  follows:

(cid:127) Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

(cid:127) Level  2  —  Observable  inputs  other  than  Level  1  prices,  such  as  quoted  prices  for  similar  assets  or
liabilities,  or  other  inputs  that  are  observable  or  can  be  corroborated  by  observable  market  data  for
substantially the full term of the assets  or liabilities; and

(cid:127) Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial
instruments whose values are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, pricing models, or

F-39

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

6.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

similar  techniques,  as  well  as  instruments  for  which  the  determination  of  fair  value  requires  significant
judgment or estimation.

If  the  inputs  used  to  measure  the  financial  assets  and  liabilities  fall  within  more  than  one  level  described
above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement
of the instrument.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on  a Recurring  Basis

The  following  fair  value  hierarchy  table  presents  the  components  and  classification  of  the  Company’s
financial assets and liabilities measured  at fair  value as of December 31,  2014 and  2013:

2014

2013

Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for

Significant
Other

Significant

Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for

Significant
Other

Significant

Identical Observable Unobservable

Identical Observable Unobservable

Carrying
Value

Assets
(Level 1)

Inputs
(Level 2)

Inputs
(Level 3)

Carrying
Value

Assets
(Level 1)

Inputs
(Level 2)

Inputs
(Level 3)

Assets:

Cash equivalents(1) . . . . . . . . . . $

4.6

$

2.8

$

1.8

$ —

$

171.3

$

171.3

$ —

$ —

Liabilities:

Acquisition-related contingent

consideration . . . . . . . . . . . $ (308.8)

$ —

$ —

$ (308.8)

$ (355.8)

$ —

$ —

$ (355.8)

(1) Cash  equivalents  include  highly  liquid  investments  with  an  original  maturity  of  three  months  or  less  at  acquisition,  primarily
including  money  market  funds,  reflected  in  the  balance  sheet  at  carrying  value,  which  approximates  fair  value  due  to  their
short-term nature.

In  addition  to  the  cash  equivalents  (described  under  the  table  above),  the  Company  has  time  deposits
valued  at  cost,  which  approximates  fair  value  due  to  their  short-term  maturities.  The  carrying  value  of
$42.6 million and $25.2 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to these investments
is  classified  within  Prepaid  expenses  and  other  current  assets  in  the  consolidated  balance  sheets.  These
investments are Level 2.

There were no transfers between Level  1 and Level 2 during the year ended  December 31,  2014.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

The fair value measurement of contingent consideration obligations arising from business combinations is
determined using unobservable (Level 3) inputs. These inputs include (i) the estimated amount and timing
of projected cash flows; (ii) the probability of the achievement of the factor(s) on which the contingency is
based;  and  (iii)  the  risk-adjusted  discount  rate  used  to  present  value  the  probability-weighted  cash  flows.
Significant  increases  (decreases)  in  any  of  those  inputs  in  isolation  could  result  in  a  significantly  lower
(higher) fair value measurement.

F-40

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

6.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

The  following  table  presents  a  reconciliation  of  contingent  consideration  obligations  measured  on  a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2014 and
2013:

2014

2013

Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(355.8) $(455.1)

Included in net income (loss):
Arising during the year(1)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14.1

29.2

Included in other comprehensive (loss) income:

Arising during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuances(2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments(3)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Release from restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.1
(93.8)
116.8
5.8

5.0
(76.1)
141.2
—

Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(308.8) $(355.8)

(1) For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014,  a  net  gain  of  $14.1  million  was  recognized  as  Acquisition-related  contingent
consideration  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income  (loss).  The  acquisition-related  contingent  consideration  net  gain  was
primarily driven by net fair value adjustments of $19.0 million related to the Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4) agreement entered into
with Meda Pharma SARL in June 2011 (the ‘‘Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4) agreement’’), as a result of continued assessment of the
impact from generic competition on performance trends and future revenue forecasts for Zovirax(cid:4).

For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013,  a  net  gain  of  $29.2  million  was  recognized  as  Acquisition-related  contingent
consideration  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income  (loss).  The  acquisition-related  contingent  consideration  net  gain  was
primarily driven by a net gain related to the Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4) agreement. As a result of analysis in the third quarter of
2013 of performance trends since the launch of a generic Zovirax(cid:4) ointment in April 2013, the Company adjusted the projected
revenue  forecast,  resulting  in  an  acquisition-related  contingent  consideration  net  gain  of  $20.0  million  in  the  year  ended
December 31, 2013. Also contributing to the acquisition-related contingent consideration net gain was a net gain of $6.9 million
which  resulted  from  the  termination,  in  the  third  quarter  of  2013,  of  the  A007  (Lacrisert(cid:4))  development  program,  which
impacted  the  probability  associated  with  potential  milestone  payments.  The  termination  of  this  program  also  resulted  in  an
IPR&D  impairment  charge  in  the  third  quarter  of  2013,  as  described  in  note  10  titled  ‘‘INTANGIBLE  ASSETS  AND
GOODWILL’’.

(2)

2014 issuances relate primarily to the Solta Medical acquisition and other smaller acquisitions, and the 2013 issuances relate to
smaller acquisitions.

(3) The  2014  payments  of  acquisition-related  contingent  consideration  relate 

the
Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4)  agreement,  and  other  smaller  acquisitions.  The  2013  payments  of  acquisition-related  contingent
consideration  related  primarily  to  the  Elidel(cid:4)/Xerese(cid:4)/Zovirax(cid:4)  agreement  and  the  OraPharma  and  the  Gerot  Lannach
acquisitions. See note 3 titled ‘‘BUSINESS COMBINATIONS’’.

the  OraPharma  acquisition, 

to 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on  a Non-Recurring Basis

As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis subsequent
to initial recognition included:

(i) an intangible asset within the Company’s Developed Markets segment, related to ezogabine/retigabine
(immediate-release  formulation)  which  is  co-developed  and  marketed  under  a  collaboration  agreement
with GlaxoSmithKline (‘‘GSK’’). The Company recognized an impairment charge of $551.6 million in the
third quarter of 2013 in Amortization and impairments of finite-lived intangible assets in the consolidated
statements  of  income  (loss).  In  addition,  the  Company  fully  impaired  an  IPR&D  asset,  within  the
formulation  of
Company’s  Developed  Markets 

a  modified-release 

segment, 

relating 

to 

F-41

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

6.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

ezogabine/retigabine, which resulted in a charge of $93.8 million. The $93.8 million write-off was recognized
in the third quarter of 2013 in In-process research and development impairments and other charges in the
consolidated  statements  of  income  (loss).  These  impairment  charges  were  driven  by  analysis  of  expected
future  cash  flows  based  on  the  communication  received  from  the  FDA  in  September  2013  regarding
labeling  changes  and  a  required  modification  of  the  approved  risk  evaluation  and  mitigation  strategy
(REMS), which includes restrictions on distribution and additional patient monitoring. Further, as a result
of this feedback received from the FDA, GSK decided that all sales force promotion for the product will be
eliminated  in  the  U.S.,  and  they  will  not  launch  the  product  in  certain  other  planned  territories.  Per  the
terms of the collaboration agreement, GSK controls all sales force promotion for the product. Such changes
are  expected  to  have  a  significant  impact  on  future  cash  flows  of  ezogabine/retigabine.  The  adjusted
carrying  amount  of  the  ezogabine/retigabine  (immediate-release  formulation)  of  $45.1  million  as  of  the
third  quarter  of  2013  was  equal  to  its  estimated  fair  value,  which  was  determined  using  discounted  cash
flows and represents Level 3 inputs. As a result of the events noted above, the Company believes that the
value of the modified-release formulation of ezogabine/retigabine  to  a  market  participant  would be zero.

(ii) assets held for sale within the Company’s Developed Markets segment, related to certain suncare and
skincare  brands,  including  inventory  on  hand,  sold  primarily  in  Australia.  The  Company  recognized
additional impairment charges of $31.5 million in 2013 for these brands in Amortization and impairments of
finite-lived  intangible  assets  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income  (loss).  The  additional  impairment
charges, which were recognized primarily in the first quarter of 2013, were driven by assessment of offers
received  and  analysis  of  updated  market  data.  During  the  fourth  quarter  of  2013,  the  Company  sold  the
skincare brands that were classified as held for sale. With respect to the remaining suncare brands, the plan
of sale changed in the fourth quarter of  2013, and the  Company no  longer intends to sell these assets.

For  further  information  regarding  asset  impairment  charges,  see  note  10  titled  ‘‘INTANGIBLE  ASSETS
AND GOODWILL’’.

7. TRADE RECEIVABLES, NET

The components of trade receivables, net as  of  December  31, 2014 and 2013  were as  follows:

Trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,111.7
(35.9)

$1,704.0
(27.6)

$2,075.8

$1,676.4

2014

2013

F-42

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

8.

INVENTORIES

The components of inventories as of  December 31, 2014 and 2013 were  as follows:

Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 232.8
98.0
732.7

$221.8
104.7
656.3

2014

2013

Less allowance for obsolescence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,063.5
(112.9)

982.8
(99.8)

$ 950.6

$883.0

9.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The  major  components  of  property,  plant  and  equipment  as  of  December  31,  2014  and  2013  were  as
follows:

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other equipment and leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment on operating lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

79.6
602.8
1,081.3
278.0
32.7
214.0

$

76.9
607.1
1,062.7
108.2
28.6
189.5

2014

2013

Less accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,288.4
(977.9)

2,073.0
(838.8)

$1,310.5

$1,234.2

Depreciation  expense  amounted  to  $186.9  million,  $113.8  million,  and  $54.8  million  in  the  years  ended
December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

F-43

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

10. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

Intangible Assets

The major components of intangible  assets as of December 31, 2014  and  2013  were as follows:

Weighted-
Average
Useful
Lives
(Years)

Finite-lived intangible assets:

Product brands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate  brands
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Partner  relationships
Out-licensed technology and other . . . . . .

Total finite-lived intangible assets(1) . . . .

Indefinite-lived intangible assets:

9
14
7
4
5

7

2014

Accumulated
Amortization,
Including

Impairments Amount

Net

Gross

Carrying Carrying
Amount

2013

Accumulated
Amortization,
Including

Net
Carrying
Impairments Amount

$(3,579.8)
(65.2)
(1,263.8)
(107.5)
(124.3)

$ 6,740.4 $10,554.2
365.6
3,021.0
194.0
264.0

299.0
1,962.1
115.6
151.2

$(2,729.1)
(44.4)
(876.9)
(83.2)
(93.8)

$ 7,825.1
321.2
2,144.1
110.8
170.2

Gross
Carrying
Amount

$10,320.2
364.2
3,225.9
223.1
275.5

14,408.9

(5,140.6)

9,268.3

14,398.8

(3,827.4)

10,571.4

Acquired IPR&D(2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate  brand(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NA
NA

290.1
1,697.5

—
—

290.1
1,697.5

579.3
1,697.5

—
—

579.3
1,697.5

$16,396.5

$(5,140.6)

$11,255.9 $16,675.6

$(3,827.4)

$12,848.2

(1)

In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company recognized a write-off of $55.2 million related to the Kinerase(cid:4) product within the
Developed Market segment. The write-off was driven by the discontinuation of the product.

In the third quarter of 2014, the Company recognized a write-off of $32.4 million related to Grifulvin(cid:4), an anti-fungal product
within  the  Developed  Markets  segment.  The  write-off  was  driven  by  withdrawal  of  the  supplemental  Abbreviated  New  Drug
Application, which resulted from assessment of extended timelines and increased costs associated with a change in the supplier
and the manufacturing process, based on feedback received from the FDA.

In the third quarter of 2013, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $551.6 million related to ezogabine/retigabine
(immediate-release  formulation),  which  is  included  within  the  Developed  Markets  segment.  This  product  is  co-developed  and
marketed under a collaboration agreement with GSK. For further information regarding this asset impairment charge, see note 6
titled ‘‘FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS’’.

In  the  first  quarter  of  2013,  the  Company  recognized  a  write-off  of  $22.2  million  related  to  Opana(cid:4),  a  pain  relief  medication
approved  in  Canada  (included  in  the  Company’s  Developed  Markets  segment),  due  to  production  issues  arising  in  the  first
quarter of 2013. These production issues resulted in higher spending projections and delayed commercialization timelines which,
in turn, triggered the Company’s decision to suspend its launch plans. The Company does not believe this program has value to a
market participant.

These impairment charges were recognized in Amortization and impairments of finite-lived intangible assets in the consolidated
statements of income (loss).

(2)

In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2013,  the  Company  wrote-off  an  IPR&D  asset  of  $14.4  million  related  to  the  termination  of  the
Mapracorat development program (included in both the Emerging Markets and Developed Markets segments), acquired by the
Company as part of B&L Acquisition, resulting from  analysis of Phase 3 study results.

In the third quarter of 2013, the Company wrote off an IPR&D asset of $93.8 million relating to a modified-release formulation
of ezogabine/retigabine. For further information regarding this write-off, see note 6 titled ‘‘FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS’’.

In  addition,  in  the  third  quarter  of  2013,  the  Company  wrote-off  IPR&D  assets  of  $27.3  million,  in  the  aggregate,  due  to  the
write-off of IPR&D assets mainly related to the termination of the A007 (Lacrisert(cid:4)) development program (Developed Markets
segment) in the third quarter of 2013. The Company  does not believe these programs have value to a market participant.

The write offs of the IPR&D assets were recognized in In-process research and development impairments and other charges in
the consolidated statements of income (loss).

F-44

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

10. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL (Continued)

(3) Represents  the  B&L  corporate  trademark,  which  has  an  indefinite  useful  life  and  is  not  amortizable.  See  note  3  ‘‘BUSINESS

COMBINATIONS’’ for further information.

The  reduction  in  Acquired  IPR&D  is  largely  driven  by  the  reclassification  to  finite-lived  intangible  assets
with respect to Jublia(cid:4), which received regulatory approval  in the  first half of 2014.

Estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years ending December 31 is as
follows:

Amortization expense(1)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,376.1

$1,280.1

$1,216.3

$1,093.6

$949.8

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

(1) Estimated amortization expense shown in the table above does not include potential future impairments of finite-lived intangible

assets,  if any.

Goodwill

The  changes  in  the  carrying  amount  of  goodwill  for  years  ended  December  31,  2014  and  2013  were  as
follows:

Developed
Markets

Emerging
Markets

Total

Balance, December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,993.0
3,395.7
28.4
11.6

$1,148.4
1,199.5
(0.3)
(24.2)

$5,141.4
4,595.2
28.1
(12.6)

Balance, December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Divestitures(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,428.7

2,323.4

9,752.1

317.4
(19.6)
(428.9)
(182.6)

78.9
(4.3)

—
(166.6)

396.3
(23.9)
(428.9)
(349.2)

Balance, December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$7,115.0

$2,231.4

$9,346.4

(1)

Primarily relates to the B&L, Obagi and Natur  Produkt acquisitions.

(2)

Primarily reflects the impact of measurement period  adjustments related to the Medicis acquisition.

(3)

Primarily relates to the PreCision and Solta Medical acquisitions.

(4)

Primarily reflects the impact of measurement period  adjustments related to the B&L Acquisition.

(5)

See note 4, titled ‘‘DIVESTITURES’’ for additional information.

F-45

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

10. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL (Continued)

As  described  in  note  3  titled  ‘‘BUSINESS  COMBINATIONS’’,  the  allocation  of  the  goodwill  balance
associated with the PreCision acquisition is provisional and subject to the completion of the valuation of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

11. ACCRUED AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

The major components of accrued and other current liabilities as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as
follows:

2014

2013

Product returns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Product rebates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued milestones(1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Professional fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring, integration and other  costs (see note  5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Royalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal settlements and related fees (see note 20) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Value added tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advertising and promotion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 380.3
714.9
196.7
204.9
62.0
55.6
66.6
41.4
8.0
6.8
24.7
6.2
18.8
122.9
25.6
33.3
210.7

$ 225.5
566.6
231.3
201.2
—
46.3
112.0
37.6
55.9
8.7
25.9
12.1
19.5
39.1
27.2
19.3
172.0

$2,179.4

$1,800.2

(1)

Primarily  relates  to  milestones  associated  with  the  agreements  with  Spear  Dermatology  Products  Inc.  (‘‘Spear’’).  See  note  21
titled ‘‘Commitments and Contingencies’’ for additional  information.

F-46

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

12. LONG-TERM DEBT

A summary of the Company’s consolidated long-term debt as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively,
is outlined in the table below:

Maturity Date

2014

2013

Revolving Credit  Facility(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April  2018
Series A-1 Tranche A Term Loan Facility, net  of unamortized debt

$

165.0 $ —

discount (2014 — $1.4; 2013 — $3.6)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April  2016

139.6

259.0

Series A-2 Tranche A Term Loan Facility, net  of unamortized debt

discount (2014 — $2.5; 2013 — $6.2)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . April  2016

135.7

228.1

Series A-3 Tranche A Term Loan Facility, net  of unamortized debt

discount (2014 — $22.4; 2013 — $35.4)(1)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 2018

1,637.9

1,935.7

Series D-2 Tranche B Term  Loan Facility, net of unamortized debt

discount of (2014 — $18.9; 2013 — $27.0)(1)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 2019

1,089.7

1,256.7

Series C-2 Tranche B Term Loan Facility,  net  of unamortized debt

discount of (2014 — $14.5; 2013 — $20.7)(1)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 2019

838.3

966.8

Series E-1 Tranche B Term Loan Facility,  net of  unamortized  debt

discount (2014 — $2.9; 2013 — $85.5)(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 2020

2,544.9

3,090.5

Senior Notes:

6.75%, net of unamortized debt discount (2013  — $1.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 2017
6.875%, net of unamortized debt discount (2014  — $1.9;  2013  — $4.4)(2)
7.00%, net of unamortized debt discount  (2014  —  $2.5; 2013  —  $2.9) . . . . . October 2020
6.75% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 2021
7.25%, net of unamortized debt discount  (2014  —  $6.8; 2013  —  $7.8) . . . . . July  2022
6.375%, net of unamortized discount (2014  — $24.4;  2013  — $28.6) . . . . . . October 2020
6.75%, net of unamortized discount (2014  — $14.2;  2013  — $18.2)
7.50%, net of unamortized discount (2014  — $16.6;  2013  — $19.1)
5.625%, net of unamortized discount (2014  — $7.4;  2013  — $8.5) . . . . . . . December  2021

. . . . . . August 2018
. . . . . . July  2021

. . December 2018

Other(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Various

Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
497.7
687.5
650.0
543.2
2,225.6
1,585.8
1,608.4
892.6
12.7

498.7
940.2
687.1
650.0
542.2
2,221.4
1,581.9
1,605.9
891.5
12.0

15,254.6
(0.9)

17,367.7
(204.8)

$15,253.7 $17,162.9

(1) Together,  the  ‘‘Senior  Secured  Credit  Facilities’’  under  the  Company’s  Third  Amended  and  Restated  Credit  and  Guaranty

Agreement, as amended (the ‘‘Credit Agreement’’).

(2) On February 17, 2015, Valeant redeemed all of the outstanding $499.6 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.875% senior
notes  due  December  2018  (the  ‘‘December  2018  Notes’’)  with  a  portion  of  the  net  proceeds  from  the  issuance  of  the  5.50%
senior  notes  due  2023  (the  ‘‘2023  Notes’’)  on  January  30,  2015.  See  note  24  titled  ‘‘SUBSEQUENT  EVENTS’’  for  further
information.

(3) Relates  primarily  to  the  debentures  assumed  in  the  B&L  Acquisition,  as  described  in  note  3  titled  ‘‘BUSINESS

COMBINATIONS’’.

The  Company’s  Senior  Secured  Credit  Facilities  and  indentures  related  to  its  senior  notes  contain
customary  covenants,  including,  among  other  things,  and  subject  to  certain  qualifications  and  exceptions,
covenants that restrict or limit the Company’s ability and the ability of its subsidiaries to: incur or guarantee
additional  indebtedness;  create  or  permit  liens  on  assets;  pay  dividends  on  capital  stock  or  redeem,
repurchase  or  retire  capital  stock  or  subordinated  indebtedness;  make  certain  investments  and  other
restricted  payments;  engage  in  mergers,  acquisitions,  consolidations  and  amalgamations;  transfer  and  sell
certain assets; and engage in transactions  with affiliates.

F-47

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

12. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

The Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities also contain specified financial covenants (consisting of a
secured  leverage  ratio  and  an  interest  coverage  ratio),  various  customary  affirmative  covenants  and
specified events of default. The Company’s indentures also contain certain customary affirmative covenants
and specified events of default.

As  of  December  31,  2014,  the  Company  was  in  compliance  with  all  covenants  associated  with  the
Company’s outstanding debt.

The total fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, with carrying values of $15.3 billion and $17.4 billion
at  December  31,  2014  and  2013,  was  $15.8  billion  and  $18.4  billion,  respectively.  The  fair  value  of  the
Company’s  long-term  debt  is  estimated  using  the  quoted  market  prices  for  the  same  or  similar  debt
issuances (Level 2).

Aggregate maturities of our long-term debt for each of the five succeeding years ending December 31 and
thereafter are as follows:

2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

0.9
639.3
360.2
3,204.5
1,961.4
9,224.7

Total gross maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unamortized discounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15,391.0
(136.4)

Total long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$15,254.6

Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On  February  13,  2012,  the  Company  and  certain  of  its  subsidiaries  as  guarantors  entered  into  the  Credit
Agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions and investors. In 2012, the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries as guarantors entered into a series of joinder agreements to, among other things, (i) increase
the  existing  tranche  B  term  loan  facility  (the  ‘‘Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility’’)  through  new  incremental
term  loans,  (ii)  reprice  and  refinance  the  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility  (such  repriced  Tranche  B  Term
Loan Facility, the ‘‘Series D Tranche B Term Loan Facility’’), and (iii) increase the amount of commitments
under the revolving credit facility provided under the Credit Agreement (the ‘‘Revolving Credit Facility’’).
In  connection  with  the  repricing  and  refinancing  of  the  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility,  the  Company
recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $17.6 million in the three-month period ended December 31,
2012. In addition, in connection with the Medicis acquisition on December 11, 2012, the Company issued
$1.0 billion in a new Series C of the Tranche B Term Loans (the ‘‘Series C Tranche B Term Loan Facility’’).

In 2013, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries as guarantors entered into a series of amendments to,
among other things, (i) reprice and refinance the existing tranche A term loan facility (as so amended, the
‘‘Series A-1 Tranche A Term Loan Facility’’), (ii) effectuate two repricings of the Series D Tranche B Term
Loan  Facility  and  Series  C  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility  (as  so  amended  in  the  second  repricing,  the
‘‘Series D-2 Tranche B Term Loan Facility’’ and ‘‘Series C-2 Tranche B Term Loan Facility’’, respectively),
and (iii) increase the amount of commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility to $1.0 billion and extend
its maturity. In connection with the repricing of the Series D Tranche B Term Loan Facility and the Series C
Tranche B Term Loan Facility, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $21.4 million in

F-48

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

12. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

the  three-month  period  ended  March  31,  2013.  In  addition,  in  connection  with  the  B&L  Acquisition,  the
Company issued $850.0 million of tranche A term loans (the ‘‘Series A-2 Tranche A Term Loan Facility’’)
and $3.2 billion of tranche B term loans (the ‘‘Series E Tranche B Term Loan Facility’’). Furthermore, on
December 20, 2013, the Company entered into Amendment No. 8 to the Credit Agreement to allow for the
extension  of  the  maturity  of  all  or  a  portion  of  the  Series  A-1  Tranche  A  Term  Loans  and  Series  A-2
Tranche A Term Loans outstanding from April 20, 2016 to October 20, 2018 (as extended, the ‘‘Series A-3
Tranche A Term Loan Facility’’).

On  February  6,  2014,  the  Company  and  certain  of  its  subsidiaries  as  guarantors  entered  into  a  joinder
agreement  to  reprice  and  refinance  the  Series  E  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility  by  the  issuance  of
$2.95  billion  in  new  term  loans  (the  ‘‘Series  E-1  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility’’).  Term  loans  under  the
Series  E  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility  were  either  exchanged  for,  or  repaid  with  the  proceeds  of,  the
Series E-1 Tranche B Term Loan Facility and proceeds of the additional Series A-3 Tranche A Term Loan
Facility  described  below.  The  Series  E-1  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility  has  terms  consistent  with  the
Series E Tranche B Term Loan Facility. In connection with this transaction, the Company recognized a loss
on extinguishment of debt of $93.7 million in  the three-month period  ended March  31, 2014.

Concurrently, on February 6, 2014, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries as guarantors entered into a
joinder  agreement  for  the  issuance  of  $225.6  million  in  incremental  term  loans  under  the  Series  A-3
Tranche  A  Term  Loan  Facility.  Proceeds  from  this  transaction  were  used  to  repay  part  of  the  term  loans
outstanding under the Series E Tranche B  Term Loan Facility.

In July 2014, the Company made principal payments of $1.0 billion, in the aggregate, related to the Senior
Secured  Credit  Facilities,  resulting  in  a  principal  reduction  as  follows:  (i)  $380.0  million  under  the
Series  E-1  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility,  (ii)  $274.5  million  under  the  Series  A-3  Tranche  A  Term  Loan
Facility, (iii) $165.4 million under the Series D-2 Tranche B Term Loan Facility, (iv) $127.2 million under
the Series C-2 Tranche B Term Loan Facility, and (v) $27.5 million and $25.4 million under the Series A-1
Tranche  A  Term  Loan  Facility  and  the  Series  A-2  Tranche  A  Term  Loan  Facility,  respectively.  Following
these  July  2014  principal  payments,  quarterly  amortization  payments  for  the  Senior  Secured  Credit
Facilities  are  as  follows:  $10.9  million  for  the  Series  A-1  Tranche  A  Term  Loans,  $7.9  million  for  the
Series A-2 Tranche A Term Loans and $45.0 million for the Series A-3 Tranche A Term Loans. There are no
remaining  quarterly  amortization  payments  for  the  Series  D-2  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility,  Series  C-2
Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility  and  the  Series  E-1  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility.  In  December  2014,  the
Company voluntarily prepaid the scheduled 2015 amortization payments applicable to the Senior Secured
Credit  Facilities, resulting in an aggregate principal reduction  of $255.3 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the effective rate of interest on the Company’s borrowings was as
follows:  (i)  2.45%  per  annum  under  the  Revolving  Credit  Facility,  (ii)  2.41%  per  annum  under  the
Series A-1 Tranche A Term Loan Facility, the Series A-2 Tranche A Term Loan Facility, and the Series A-3
Tranche  A  Term  Loan  Facility,  (iii)  3.71%  per  annum  under  both  the  Series  D-2  Tranche  B  Term  Loan
Facility and the Series C-2 Tranche B Term Loan Facility, and (iv) 3.80% under the Series E-1 Tranche B
Term Loan Facility. As of December 31, 2014, the applicable margins on the Company’s borrowings were as
follows:  (i)  1.25%  with  respect  to  base  rate  borrowings  and  2.25%  with  respect  to  LIBO  rate  borrowings
under the Revolving Credit Facility, Series A-1, A-2 and A-3 Tranche A Term Loan Facilities, and (ii) 1.75%
with respect to base rate borrowings and 2.75% with respect to LIBO rate borrowings, subject to a 1.75%
base  rate  floor  and  a  0.75%  LIBO  rate  floor,  under  the  Series  D-2,  C-2  and  E-1  Tranche  B  Term  Loan
Facilities.

F-49

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

12. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

The loans under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities may be made to, and the letters of credit under the
Revolving  Credit  Facility  may  be  issued  on  behalf  of,  the  Company.  All  borrowings  under  the  Senior
Secured Credit Facilities are subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions, including the absence of a
default or an event of default and the accuracy in all material respects of representations and warranties.

In  addition  to  paying  interest  on  outstanding  principal  under  the  Senior  Secured  Credit  Facilities,  the
Company  is  required  to  pay  commitment  fees  of  0.50%  per  annum  in  respect  of  the  unutilized
commitments  under  the  Revolving  Credit  Facility,  payable  quarterly  in  arrears.  The  Company  also  is
required to pay letter of credit fees on the maximum amount available to be drawn under all outstanding
letters of credit in an amount equal to the applicable margin on LIBO rate borrowings under the Revolving
Credit Facility on a per annum basis, payable quarterly in arrears, as well as customary fronting fees for the
issuance of letters  of credit and agency fees.

Subject  to  certain  exceptions  and  customary  baskets  set  forth  in  the  Credit  Agreement,  the  Company  is
required  to  make  mandatory  prepayments  of  the  loans  under  the  Senior  Secured  Credit  Facilities  under
certain circumstances, including from (a) 100% of net cash proceeds from asset sales outside the ordinary
course  of  business  (subject  to  reinvestment  rights),  (b)  100%  of  the  net  cash  proceeds  of  insurance  and
condemnation  proceeds  for  property  or  asset  losses  (subject  to  reinvestment  rights  and  net  proceeds
threshold), (c) 50% of the net cash proceeds from the issuance of equity securities subject to decrease based
on  leverage  ratios,  (d)  100%  of  the  net  cash  proceeds  from  the  incurrence  of  debt  (other  than  permitted
debt as defined in the Credit Agreement) and (e) 50% of Consolidated Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the
Credit  Agreement) subject to decrease based on leverage ratios.

The  Company  is  permitted  to  voluntarily  reduce  the  unutilized  portion  of  the  revolving  commitment
amount  and  repay  outstanding  loans  under  the  Revolving  Credit  Facility  at  any  time  without  premium  or
penalty, other than customary ‘‘breakage’’ costs with respect to LIBO rate loans. As of December 31, 2014,
the Company is permitted to voluntarily repay outstanding loans under the Tranche A Term Loan Facility
and  Tranche  B  Term  Loan  Facility  at  any  time  without  premium  or  penalty,  other  than  customary
‘‘breakage’’ costs with respect to LIBO  rate loans.

The Company’s obligations and the obligations of the guarantors under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities
and certain hedging arrangements and cash management arrangements entered into with lenders under the
Senior  Secured  Credit  Facilities  (or  affiliates  thereof)  are  secured  by  first-priority  security  interests  in
substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the Company and the guarantors, including 100% of the
capital  stock  of  Valeant  and  each  material  subsidiary  of  the  Company  (other  than  Valeant’s  foreign
subsidiaries)  and  65%  of  the  capital  stock  of  each  foreign  subsidiary  of  Valeant  that  is  directly  owned  by
Valeant  or  owned  by  a  guarantor  that  is  a  domestic  subsidiary  of  Valeant,  in  each  case  subject  to  certain
exclusions set forth in the credit documentation governing  the Senior Secured Credit Facilities.

Senior Notes

The  senior  notes  issued  by  the  Company  are  the  Company’s  senior  unsecured  obligations  and  are  jointly
and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of its subsidiaries that is a guarantor under
our  Senior  Secured  Credit  Facilities.  The  senior  notes  issued  by  the  Company’s  subsidiary  Valeant  are
senior unsecured obligations of Valeant and are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis
by  the  Company  and  each  of  its  subsidiaries  (other  than  Valeant)  that  is  a  guarantor  under  our  Senior
Secured Credit Facilities. Certain of the future subsidiaries of the Company and Valeant may be required to
guarantee the senior notes.

F-50

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

12. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

If the Company experiences a change in control, the Company may be required to repurchase each of the
senior notes issuances discussed below, as applicable, in whole or in part, at a purchase price equal to 101%
of the aggregate principal amount of the senior notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but
excluding the applicable purchase date  of  the senior notes.

6.50% Senior Notes due 2016 and 7.25%  Senior Notes due 2022

On  March  8,  2011,  Valeant  issued  $950.0  million  aggregate  principal  amount  of  6.50%  senior  notes  due
2016  (the  ‘‘2016  Notes’’)  and  $550.0  million  aggregate  principal  amount  of  7.25%  senior  notes  due  2022
(the ‘‘2022 Notes’’) in a private placement. The 2022 Notes will mature on July 15, 2022 and accrue interest
at  the  rate  of  7.25%  per  year,  payable  semi-annually  in  arrears,  which  commenced  on  July  15,  2011.  The
2022 Notes were issued at 98.125% of par for an  effective annual yield of 7.50%.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, Valeant redeemed $34.5 million of principal amount of the 2016 Notes. In the
fourth quarter of 2013, Valeant redeemed all $915.5 million of the outstanding principal amount of the 2016
Notes for $945.3 million, including a call premium of $29.8 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest, and
satisfied and discharged the 2016 Notes indenture, solely with respect to the 2016 Notes. In connection with
this  transaction,  the  Company  recognized  a  loss  on  extinguishment  of  debt  of  $32.5  million  in  the  three-
month period ended December 31, 2013.

Valeant  may  redeem  the  2022  Notes  at  any  time  prior  to  July  15,  2016  at  a  price  equal  to  100%  of  the
principal  amount  thereof,  plus  accrued  and  unpaid  interest,  if  any,  to  the  date  of  redemption,  plus  a
‘‘make-whole’’ premium. On or after July 15, 2016, Valeant may redeem all or a portion of the 2022 Notes,
at the redemption prices applicable to the 2022 Notes, as set forth in the 2022 Notes indenture, plus accrued
and unpaid interest to the date of redemption of  the 2022 Notes,  as applicable.

6.75% Senior Notes due 2017 and 7.00%  Senior Notes due 2020

On  September  28,  2010,  Valeant  issued  $500.0  million  aggregate  principal  amount  of  6.75%  senior  notes
due 2017 (the ‘‘2017 Notes’’) and $700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due 2020
(the  ‘‘October  2020  Notes’’)  in  a  private  placement.  On  October  15,  2014,  Valeant  redeemed  all  of  the
outstanding $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2017 Notes for $518.2 million, including a call
premium  of  $16.9  million,  plus  accrued  and  unpaid  interest,  and  satisfied  and  discharged  the  2017  Notes
indenture, solely with respect to the 2017 Notes. In connection with the redemption of the 2017 Notes, the
Company recognized a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $17.9 million in the three-month period ended
December  31,  2014.  The  October  2020  Notes  mature  on  October  1,  2020.  Interest  on  the  October  2020
Notes accrues at the rate of 7.00% and is payable semi-annually in arrears, which commenced on April 1,
2011. The October 2020 Notes were issued at a discount of 99.375% for an effective annual yield of 7.09%.

Valeant may redeem all or a portion of the October 2020 Notes at any time prior to October 1, 2015, at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of
redemption, plus a ‘‘make-whole’’ premium, as set forth in the October 2020 Notes indenture. In the fourth
quarter  of  2011,  Valeant  redeemed  $10.0  million  of  principal  amount  of  the  October  2020  Notes.  On  or
after October 1, 2015, Valeant may redeem all or a portion of the October 2020 Notes, in each case at the
redemption prices applicable to the October 2020 Notes, as set forth in the October 2020 Notes indenture,
plus accrued and unpaid interest to the  date  of redemption.

F-51

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

12. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

6.875% Senior Notes due 2018

On November 23, 2010, Valeant issued $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of the December 2018 Notes
in a private placement. The December 2018 Notes mature on December 1, 2018. Interest on the December
2018  Notes  accrues  at  a  rate  of  6.875%  and  is  payable  semi-annually  in  arrears,  which  commenced  on
June 1, 2011. The December 2018 Notes were issued at a discount of 99.24% for an effective annual yield of
7.0%.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, Valeant redeemed $55.4 million of principal amount of the December 2018
Notes.  On  December  29,  2014,  Valeant  redeemed  $445.0  million  aggregate  principal  amount  of  the
December  2018  Notes  for  $462.7  million,  including  a  call  premium  of  $15.3  million,  plus  accrued  and
unpaid interest. In connection with the redemption of the December 2018 Notes, the Company recognized
a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $17.9 million in the three-month period ended December 31, 2014.

6.75% Senior Notes due 2021

On February 8, 2011, Valeant issued at par $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75% senior notes
due 2021 (the ‘‘August 2021 Notes’’) in a private placement. Interest on the August 2021 Notes accrues at
the rate of 6.75% per year and is payable semi-annually in arrears, which commenced on August 15, 2011.
The August 2021 Notes mature on August 15, 2021.

Valeant may redeem all or a portion of the August 2021 Notes at any time prior to February 15, 2016, at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of
redemption,  plus  a  ‘‘make-whole’’  premium.  On  or  after  February  15,  2016,  Valeant  may  redeem  all  or  a
portion of the August 2021 Notes at the redemption prices applicable to the August 2021 Notes as set forth
in  the  August  2021  Notes  indenture,  plus  accrued  and  unpaid  interest  to  the  date  of  redemption  of  the
August 2021 Notes.

6.375% Senior Notes due 2020

On October 4, 2012, VPI Escrow Corp. (the ‘‘VPI Escrow Issuer’’), a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary
of Valeant, issued $1.75 billion aggregate principal amount of 6.375% senior notes due 2020 (the ‘‘6.375%
Notes’’) in a private placement. The 6.375% Notes mature on October 15, 2020. The 6.375% Notes accrue
interest  at  the  rate  of  6.375%  per  year,  which  is  payable  semi-annually  in  arrears,  which  commenced  on
April 15, 2013. In connection with the issuance of the 6.375% Notes, the Company incurred approximately
$26.3  million  in  underwriting  fees,  which  are  recognized  as  debt  issue  discount,  which  resulted  in  the  net
proceeds  of  $1,723.7  million.  At  the  time  of  the  closing  of  the  Medicis  acquisition,  (1)  the  VPI  Escrow
Issuer  merged  with  and  into  Valeant,  with  Valeant  continuing  as  the  surviving  corporation,  (2)  Valeant
assumed all of the VPI Escrow Issuer’s obligations under the 6.375% Notes and the related indenture and
(3) the funds previously held in escrow were released to the Company and were used to finance the Medicis
acquisition.

The indenture governing the terms of the 6.375% Notes provides that the 6.375% Notes are redeemable at
the  option  of  Valeant,  in  whole  or  in  part,  at  any  time  on  or  after  October  15,  2016,  at  the  specified
redemption  prices,  plus  accrued  and  unpaid  interest,  if  any,  to  the  redemption  date.  In  addition,  Valeant
may  redeem  some  or  all  of  the  6.375%  Notes  prior  to  October  15,  2016,  in  each  case  at  a  price  equal  to
100% of the principal amount thereof, plus a make-whole premium. Prior to October 15, 2015, Valeant may
also  redeem  up  to  35%  of  the  aggregate  principal  amount  of  the  6.375%  Notes  using  the  proceeds  from
certain  equity  offerings  at  a  redemption  price  equal  to  106.375%  of  the  principal  amount  of  the  6.375%
Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the  date of  redemption.

F-52

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

12. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

Concurrently  with  the  offering  of  the  6.375%  Notes  on  October  4,  2012,  Valeant  issued  $500.0  million
aggregate  principal  amount  of  6.375%  senior  notes  due  2020  (the  ‘‘Exchangeable  Notes’’)  in  a  private
placement,  the  form  and  terms  of  such  notes  being  substantially  identical  to  the  form  and  terms  of  the
6.375%  Notes,  as  described  above.  In  connection  with  the  issuance  of  the  Exchangeable  Notes,  the
Company  incurred  approximately  $7.5  million  in  underwriting  fees,  which  are  recognized  as  debt  issue
discount, which resulted in the net proceeds of $492.5 million.

On  March  29,  2013,  the  Company  announced  that  Valeant  commenced  an  offer  to  exchange  (the
‘‘Exchange  Offer’’)  any  and  all  of  its  Exchangeable  Notes  into  the  previously  outstanding  6.375%  Notes.
Valeant conducted the Exchange Offer in order to satisfy its obligations under the indenture governing the
Exchangeable  Notes  with  the  anticipated  result  being  that  some  or  all  of  such  notes  would  be  part  of  a
single series of 6.375% senior notes under one indenture. The Exchange Offer, which did not result in any
changes to existing terms or to the total amount of the Company’s debt outstanding, expired on April 26,
2013.

6.75% Senior Notes due 2018 and 7.50%  Senior Notes due 2021

On July 12, 2013, VPII Escrow Corp. (the ‘‘VPII Escrow Issuer’’), a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary
of  the  Company,  issued  $1.6  billion  aggregate  principal  amount  of  the  6.75%  senior  notes  due  2018  (the
‘‘August  2018  Notes’’)  and  $1.625  billion  aggregate  principal  amount  of  the  7.50%  senior  notes  due  2021
(the ‘‘July 2021 Notes’’) in a private placement. The August 2018 Notes mature on August 15, 2018 and bear
interest  at  the  rate  of  6.75%  per  annum,  payable  semi-annually  in  arrears,  which  commenced  on
February 15, 2014. The July 2021 Notes mature on July 15, 2021 and bear interest at the rate of 7.50% per
annum, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year, commencing on January 15, 2014. In
connection  with  the  issuances  of  the  August  2018  Notes  and  the  July  2021  Notes,  the  Company  incurred
approximately  $20.0  million  and  $20.3  million  in  underwriting  fees,  respectively,  which  are  recognized  as
debt issue discount and which resulted in net proceeds of $1,580.0 million and $1,604.7 million, respectively.
At  the  time  of  the  closing  of  the  B&L  Acquisition,  (1)  the  VPII  Escrow  Issuer  was  voluntarily  liquidated
and  all  of  its  obligations  were  assumed  by,  and  all  of  its  assets  were  distributed  to  the  Company,  (2)  the
Company assumed all of the VPII Escrow Issuer’s obligations under the August 2018 Notes and July 2021
Notes and the related indenture and (3) the funds previously held in escrow were released to the Company
and were used to finance the B&L Acquisition.

The indenture governing the terms of the August 2018 Notes and July 2021 Notes provides that the August
2018 Notes and the July 2021 Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at
any time on or after August 15, 2015 and July 15, 2016, respectively, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
to the applicable redemption date. In addition, the Company may redeem some or all of the August 2018
Notes prior to August 15, 2015 and some or all of the July 2021 Notes prior to July 15, 2016, in each case at
a  price  equal  to  100%  of  the  principal  amount  thereof,  plus  a  make-whole  premium.  Prior  to  August  15,
2015, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the August 2018 Notes and
prior to July 15, 2016, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the July
2021 Notes, in each case using the proceeds of certain equity offerings at the respective redemption price
equal  to  106.75%  and  107.50%  of  the  principal  amount  of  the  August  2018  Notes  and  July  2021  Notes,
respectively, plus accrued and unpaid  interest to the  applicable  date of  redemption.

F-53

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

12. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

5.625% Senior Notes due 2021

On December 2, 2013, the Company issued $900.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 5.625% senior
notes due 2021 (the ‘‘December 2021 Notes’’) in a private placement. The December 2021 Notes mature on
December  1,  2021  and  bear  interest  at  the  rate  of  5.625%  per  annum,  payable  semi-annually,  which
commenced on June 1, 2014. In connection with the issuances of the December 2021 Notes, the Company
incurred  approximately  $8.5  million  in  underwriting  fees,  respectively,  which  are  recognized  as  debt  issue
discount and which resulted in net proceeds of  $891.5 million.

The indenture governing the terms of the December 2021 Notes provides that the  December 2021  Notes
are  redeemable  at  the  option  of  the  Company,  in  whole  or  in  part,  at  any  time  on  or  after  December  1,
2016, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date. In addition, the Company
may  redeem  some  or  all  of  the  December  2021  Notes  prior  to  December  1,  2016,  in  each  case  at  a  price
equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus a make-whole premium. Prior to December 1, 2016,
the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the December 2021 Notes using
the proceeds of certain equity offerings at the redemption price equal to 105.625% of the principal amount
of the December 2021 Notes, plus accrued  and  unpaid interest to the  redemption  date.

Commitment Letters

In  connection  with  the  B&L  Acquisition,  the  Company  and  its  subsidiary,  Valeant,  entered  into  a
commitment  letter  dated  as  of  May  24,  2013  (as  amended  and  restated  as  of  June  4,  2013,  the
‘‘Commitment  Letter’’),  with  various  financial  institutions  to  provide  up  to  $9.275  billion  of  unsecured
bridge loans. Subsequently, the Company obtained $9.575 billion in financing through a syndication of the
Incremental  Term  Loan  Facilities  under  the  Company’s  existing  Senior  Secured  Credit  Facilities  of
$4.05  billion,  the  issuance  of  the  August  2018  Notes  in  an  aggregate  principal  amount  of  $1.6  billion,  the
issuance of the July 2021 Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $1.625 billion, and the issuance of new
equity  of  approximately  $2.3  billion.  The  proceeds  from  the  issuance  of  the  Incremental  Term  Loan
Facilities,  the  August  2018  Notes,  the  July  2021  Notes  and  the  equity  were  utilized  to  fund  the  B&L
incurred  approximately
Acquisition.  In  connection  with  the  Commitment  Letter,  the  Company 
$37.3 million in fees, which were recognized as deferred financing costs. In the second quarter of 2013, the
Company  expensed  $24.2  million  of  deferred  financing  costs  associated  with  the  Commitment  Letter  to
Interest expense in the consolidated statements of income (loss). The remaining $13.1 million of deferred
financing  costs  was  expensed  to  Interest  expense  in  the  third  quarter  of  2013  upon  closing  of  the  August
2018 Notes and July 2021 Notes on July  12, 2013.

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

In connection with the B&L Acquisition completed on August 5, 2013, the Company assumed all of B&L’s
benefit obligations and related plan assets. This includes defined benefit plans and a participatory defined
benefit postretirement medical and life insurance plan, which covers a closed grandfathered group of legacy
B&L  U.S.  employees  and  employees  in  certain  other  countries.  The  U.S.  defined  benefit  accruals  were
frozen  as  of  December  31,  2004  and  benefits  that  were  earned  up  to  December  31,  2004  were  preserved.
Participants continue to earn interest credits on their cash balance. The most significant non-U.S. plans are
two  defined  benefit  plans  in  Ireland.  In  2011,  both  Ireland  plans  were  closed  to  future  service  benefit
accruals; however additional accruals related to annual salary increases continued. In December 2014, one
of  the  Ireland  plans  was  amended  effective  August  2014  to  eliminate  future  benefit  accruals  related  to
salary increases. All of the pension benefits accrued through the plan amendment date were preserved. As a
result  of  the  recent  plan  amendment,  there  are  no  active  plan  participants  accruing  benefits  under  the

F-54

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

amended Ireland plan. The postretirement benefit plan was amended effective January 1, 2005 to eliminate
employer  contributions  after  age  65  for  participants  who  did  not  meet  the  minimum  requirements  of  age
and  service  on  that  date.  The  employer  contributions  for  medical  and  prescription  drug  benefits  for
participants  retiring  after  March  1,  1989  were  frozen  effective  January  1,  2010.  Effective  January  1,  2014,
the Company no longer offers medical  and  life insurance coverage to new retirees.

In  addition,  outside  of  the  U.S.,  a  limited  group  of  Valeant  employees  are  covered  by  defined  benefit
pension plans.

The Company uses December 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its defined benefit pension
plans and the postretirement benefit  plan.

Accounting for Pension Benefit Plans and  Postretirement Benefit Plan

The Company recognizes on its balance sheet an asset or liability equal to the over- or under-funded benefit
obligation of each defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plan. Actuarial gains or
losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of
net periodic benefit cost are recognized, net of tax, as a component of  other  comprehensive income.

The  table  below  presents  the  amounts  recognized  in  accumulated  other  comprehensive  loss  as  of
December 31, 2014 and 2013:

Pension Benefit Plans

U.S. Plan

Non-U.S. Plans

Postretirement
Benefit Plan

2014

2013

2014

2013

2014

2013

Unrecognized actuarial (losses) gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized prior service credits(1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(18.2) $11.2

—

—

$(72.9) $12.7
26.8 —

$ (3.8) $ 1.0
27.9
25.5

(1) Relate to negative plan amendments, as described  below.

Of  the  December  31,  2014  amounts,  the  Company  expects  to  recognize  $2.5  million  and  $0.6  million  of
unrecognized prior service credits related to the U.S. postretirement benefit plan and the non-U.S. pension
benefit plans, respectively, in net periodic (benefit) cost during 2015. In addition, the Company expects to
recognize $1.4 million of unrecognized net loss related to the non-U.S. pension benefit plans in net periodic
(benefit) cost during 2015.

F-55

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

Net Periodic (Benefit) Cost

The  following  table  provides  the  components  of  net  periodic  (benefit)  cost  for  the  Company’s  defined
benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plan for the year ended December 31,  2014 and  2013:

Pension Benefit Plans

U.S. Plan

Non-U.S. Plans

Postretirement
Benefit  Plan

2014

2013

2014

2013

2014

2013

Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of net gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Curtailment gain recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of prior service credit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlement loss (gain) recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 0.4
10.8
(14.7)
—
—
—

0.9

—

$ 0.1
4.5
(5.9)
—
—
—
(0.1)
—

$ 2.2
3.7
(3.1)

$ 3.9
8.3
(7.7)
(0.2) —
(1.6) —
—
—
0.6 —
0.2
—
0.2 —

$ 0.9
$ 1.7
1.6
2.3
(0.3)
(0.5)
—
—
—
—
(2.5) —
—
—

Net periodic (benefit) cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (2.6) $(1.4) $ 3.1

$ 3.4

$ 1.0

$ 2.2

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the net periodic cost, which relates to the legacy Valeant defined
benefit plans in Mexico, was not material to the  Company’s results of operations.

F-56

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

Benefit Obligation, Change in Plan Assets and Funded Status

The table below presents components of the change in projected benefit obligation, change in plan assets
and funded status at December 31, 2014 and 2013:

Pension Benefit Plans

U.S. Plan

Non-U.S. Plans

2014

2013

2014

2013

Postretirement
Benefit  Plan(1)
2013
2014

Change in Projected benefit  Obligation
Projected benefit obligation, beginning  of  year . . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost
Acquisition of B&L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan amendments(2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan curtailments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial losses (gains) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$234.6
0.4
10.8
—
—
—
—
(13.0)
(10.4)
29.4
—
—

$ —

0.1
4.5
244.2
—
—
—
(5.3)
(4.3)
(4.6)
—
—

$ 59.2
1.7
2.3

—

1.2

$ 229.7
3.9
8.3

$

7.0
2.2
3.7
224.0
—
—
—
(29.4) —
(1.6) —
(0.4)
(6.2)
101.9
(33.8)
0.2

—

—
—
(0.1) —
(3.6)
(10.1)
6.6

(8.1)
5.9

—
—

$ —

0.9
1.6
87.6
0.3
(27.9)
—
—
(3.0)
(0.3)
—
—

Projected benefit obligation, end  of year . . . . . . . . . . .

251.8

234.6

272.6

229.7

62.2

59.2

Change in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan  assets,  beginning of  year . . . . . . . . .
Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of B&L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$197.3
13.8
—

8.9

—
(13.0)
(10.4)
—

$ —

12.7
—

3.3
190.9
(5.3)
(4.3)
—

$ 139.1
17.5
—

$

1.3
5.1

—

$ 14.5
1.5
1.2

8.4

—
(0.4)
(6.2)
(17.9)

7.0
125.6

—
—
(0.1) —
(3.6)
3.8

(8.1)
—

Fair value of plan  assets,  end  of year . . . . . . . . . . . . .

196.6

197.3

140.5

139.1

9.1

$ —

1.1
0.3

—
16.1
—
(3.0)
—

14.5

Funded Status at end of  year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (55.2) $ (37.3) $(132.1) $ (90.6) $(53.1) $(44.7)

Recognized as:
Other long-term assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension and  other benefit liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ —
—
(55.2)

$ —
—
(37.3)

$

1.4
(2.0)
(131.5)

$

$ —
1.5
(2.1) —

(90.0)

(53.1)

$ —
—
(44.7)

(1) Assumed in connection with the B&L Acquisition, as described above.

(2)

In December 2014, one of the Ireland plans was amended effective August 2014 to eliminate future benefit accruals related to
salary increases. The reduction in accruing benefits was accounted for as a negative plan amendment resulting in an accumulated
benefit  obligation  reduction  that  was  recognized  as  a  component  of  accumulated  other  comprehensive  loss  and  is  being
amortized  into  income  over  approximately  42.5  years.  In  the  fourth  quarter  of  2013,  the  Company  announced  that  effective
January 1, 2014, B&L will no longer offer medical and life insurance coverage to new retirees. The reduction in medical benefits
was accounted for as a negative plan amendment resulting in an accumulated postretirement benefit obligation reduction that

F-57

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

was recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and is being amortized into income over approximately
11.3 years.

(3) The  2014  and  2013  plan  settlements  primarily  reflect  lump  sum  benefit  payments  made  to  terminating  employees  of  the  U.S.

pension benefit plan.

A  number  of  the  Company’s  pension  benefit  plans  were  underfunded  at  December  31,  2014  and  2013,
having  accumulated  benefit  obligations  exceeding  the  fair  value  of  plan  assets.  Information  for  the
underfunded plans is presented in the  following  table:

Pension Benefit Plans

U.S. Plan

Non-U.S. Plans

2014

2013

2014

2013

Projected benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$251.8
251.8
196.6

$234.6
234.6
197.3

$266.4
257.3
133.1

$224.1
196.3
132.2

Information  for  the  pension  benefit  plans  that  are  underfunded  on  a  projected  benefit  obligation  basis
(versus  underfunded  on  an  accumulated  benefit  basis  as  in  the  table  above)  is  presented  in  the  following
table:

Pension Benefit Plans

U.S. Plan

Non-U.S. Plans

2014

2013

2014

2013

Projected benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$251.8
196.6

$234.6
197.3

$267.9
134.3

$225.5
133.4

The Non-U.S. Plans’ accumulated benefit obligation for both the funded and underfunded pension benefit
plans was $263.1 million and $201.5 million  at December 31,  2014 and December  31, 2013, respectively.

The Company’s policy for funding its pension benefit plans is to make contributions that meet or exceed the
minimum 
requirements.  These  contributions  are  determined  based  upon
recommendations made by the actuary under accepted actuarial principles. In 2015, the Company expects
to  contribute  $10.1  million  and  $7.4  million  to  the  U.S.  and  Non-U.S.  pension  benefit  plans,  respectively.

statutory 

funding 

The  Company  plans  to  use  postretirement  benefit  plan  assets  and  cash  on  hand,  as  necessary,  to  fund
postretirement benefit plan benefit payments in 2015.

F-58

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

Future benefit payments over the next 10 years for the pension benefit plans and the postretirement benefit
plan,  which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are  expected to be paid as  follows:

Pension Benefit Plans

U.S. Plan

Non-U.S. Plans

Postretirement
Benefit
Plan

2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020-2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$13.4
18.9
18.9
18.2
17.7
85.1

$ 5.0
3.9
4.4
4.4
5.4
37.7

$ 6.8
6.4
5.9
5.4
5.0
20.1

Assumptions

The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs and benefit obligations at
December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

Pension Benefit
Plans

2014

2013

Postretirement
Benefit Plan(1)
2013
2014

For Determining Net Periodic Benefit  Cost
U.S. Plans:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.70% 4.50% 4.30%(2) 4.50%
7.50% 7.50% 5.50% 5.50%

—

—

—

—

Non-U.S. Plans:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.86% 3.61%
5.63% 5.59%
2.88% 2.80%

For Determining Benefit Obligation
U.S. Plans:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.90% 4.70% 3.70% 4.30%

—

—

—

—

Non-U.S. Plans:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.41% 3.85%
2.86% 2.88%

(1) The Company does not have non-U.S. postretirement benefit plans.

(2) The  discount  rate  for  the  postretirement  benefit  plan  was  impacted  by  the  amendment  described  above  which  eliminated

coverage for new retirees.

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was developed based on a capital markets model that
uses  expected  asset  class  returns,  variance  and  correlation  assumptions.  The  expected  asset  class  returns
were  developed  starting  with  current  Treasury  (for  the  U.S.  pension  plan)  or  Eurozone  (for  the  Ireland
pension  plans)  government  yields  and  then  adding  corporate  bond  spreads  and  equity  risk  premiums  to

F-59

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

develop the return expectations for each asset class. The expected asset class returns are forward-looking.
The  variance  and  correlation  assumptions  are  also  forward-looking.  They  take  into  account  historical
relationships, but are adjusted to reflect expected capital market trends. The expected return on plan assets
for  the  Company’s  U.S.  pension  plan  for  2014  was  7.50%  and  for  the  postretirement  benefit  plan  was
5.50%.  The  expected  return  for  the  postretirement  plan  is  based  on  the  expected  return  for  the  U.S.
pension  plan  reduced  by  2.0%  to  reflect  an  estimate  of  additional  administrative  expenses.  The  expected
return  on plan assets for the Company’s  Ireland pension plans was 6.0% for 2014.

The  discount  rate  used  to  determine  benefit  obligations  represents  the  current  rate  at  which  the  benefit
plan liabilities could be effectively settled considering the timing of expected payments for plan participants.

The 2015 expected rate of return for the U.S. pension benefit plan and the U.S. postretirement benefit plan
will  remain  at  7.50%  percent  and  5.50%,  respectively.  The  2015  expected  rate  of  return  for  the  Ireland
pension benefit plans will also remain at  6.0%.

Plan  Assets

Pension  and  postretirement  benefit  plan  assets  are  invested  in  several  asset  categories.  The  following
presents the actual asset allocation as of  December 31,  2014 and  2013:

Pension Benefit
Plans

Postretirement
Benefit  Plan

2014

2013

2014

2013

U.S. Plan

Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
60% 60% 45% 63%
40% 40% 16% 24%
Fixed income securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —% —% 39% 13%

Non-U.S. Plans

Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed income securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44% 43%
42% 47%
14% 10%

The  investment  strategy  underlying  pension  plan  asset  allocation  is  to  manage  the  assets  of  the  plan  to
provide  for  the  long-term  liabilities  while  maintaining  sufficient  liquidity  to  pay  current  benefits.  Pension
plan  assets  are  diversified  to  protect  against  large  investment  losses  and  to  reduce  the  probability  of
excessive  performance  volatility.  Diversification  of  assets  is  achieved  by  allocating  funds  to  various  asset
classes  and  investment  styles  within  asset  classes,  and  retaining  investment  management  firm(s)  with
complementary investment philosophies,  styles  and approaches.

The  Company’s  pension  plan  assets  are  managed  by  outside  investment  managers  using  a  total  return
investment  approach,  whereby  a  mix  of  equity  and  debt  securities  investments  are  used  to  maximize  the
long-term rate of return on plan assets. A significant portion of the assets of the U.S. and Ireland pension
plans have been invested in equity securities, as equity portfolios have historically provided higher returns
than  debt  and  other  asset  classes  over  extended  time  horizons.  Correspondingly,  equity  investments  also
entail  greater  risks  than  other  investments.  Equity  risks  are  balanced  by  investing  a  significant  portion  of
plan  assets in broadly diversified fixed income securities.

F-60

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

Fair Value of Plan Assets

The Company measured the fair value of plan assets based on the prices that would be received to sell an
asset  or  paid  to  transfer  a  liability  in  an  orderly  transaction  between  market  participants  at  the
measurement date. Fair value measurements are based on a three-tier hierarchy described in note 6 titled
‘‘FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS’’.

The table below presents total plan assets by investment category as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the
classification of each investment category within the fair value hierarchy with respect to the inputs used to
measure fair value:

Pension Benefit Plans — U.S. Plans

As of December 31, 2014

Quoted
Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1.3

$ —

$ —

$

1.3

Assets

Cash & cash equivalents(1)
Commingled funds:(2)(3)
Equity securities:

U.S. broad market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-U.S. developed markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fixed income securities:

Investment grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Global high yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—
—

—
—

74.9
15.9
25.5

59.4
19.6

—
—
—

—
—

74.9
15.9
25.5

59.4
19.6

$1.3

$195.3

$ —

$196.6

Cash & cash equivalents(1)
Commingled funds:(2)(3)
Equity securities:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$0.4

$ —

$ —

$

0.4

As of December 31, 2013

U.S. broad market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-U.S. developed markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fixed income securities:

Investment grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Global high yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—
—

—
—

72.7
16.5
27.9

59.0
20.8

—
—
—

—
—

72.7
16.5
27.9

59.0
20.8

$0.4

$196.9

$ —

$197.3

F-61

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

Pension Benefit Plans — Non-U.S. Plans

As of December 31, 2014

Quoted
Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$14.0

$ —

$ —

$ 14.0

Assets

Cash & cash equivalents(1)
Commingled funds:(2)(3)
Equity securities:

Emerging markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Worldwide developed markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fixed income securities:

Investment grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Global high yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Government bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—

—
—
—
—

1.0
61.5

11.2
1.0
46.4
5.4

—
—

—
—
—
—

1.0
61.5

11.2
1.0
46.4
5.4

$14.0

$126.5

$ —

$140.5

Cash & cash equivalents(1)
Commingled funds:(2)(3)
Equity securities:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 9.3

$ —

$ —

$

9.3

As of December 31, 2013

Emerging markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Worldwide developed markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fixed income securities:

Investment grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Global high yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Government bond funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—

—
—
—
—

0.9
59.2

21.3
0.7
42.5
5.2

—
—

—
—
—
—

0.9
59.2

21.3
0.7
42.5
5.2

$ 9.3

$129.8

$ —

$139.1

F-62

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

Assets

Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Insurance policies(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Insurance policies(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Postretirement Benefit Plan

As of December 31, 2014

Quoted
Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

$ 3.5
—

$ 3.5

$ 1.8
—

$ 1.8

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

$ —

5.6

5.6

$

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

$ —
—

$ —

As of December 31, 2013

$ —

12.7

$ 12.7

$ —
—

$ —

Total

$

$

3.5
5.6

9.1

$

1.8
12.7

$ 14.5

(1) Cash  equivalents  consisted  primarily  of  term  deposits  and  money  market  instruments.  The  fair  value  of  the  term  deposits
approximates  their  carrying  amounts  due  to  their  short  term  maturities.  The  money  market  instruments  also  have  short
maturities and are valued using a market approach based on the quoted market prices of identical instruments.

(2) Commingled funds are not publicly traded. The underlying assets in these funds are publicly traded on the exchanges and have
readily  available  price  quotes.  The  Ireland  pension  plans  held  approximately  85%  of  the  non-U.S.  commingled  funds  in  both
2014 and 2013. The commingled funds held by the U.S.  and  Ireland pension plans are primarily invested in index funds.

(3) The underlying assets in the fixed income funds are generally valued using the net asset value per fund share, which is derived

using  a  market approach with inputs that include  broker quotes, benchmark yields, base spreads and reported trades.

(4) The insurance policies held by the postretirement benefit plan consist of variable life insurance contracts whose fair value is their
cash  surrender  value.  Cash  surrender  value  is  the  amount  currently  payable  by  the  insurance  company  upon  surrender  of  the
policy and is based principally on the net asset values of the underlying trust funds. The trust funds are commingled funds that
are  not  publicly  traded.  The  underlying  assets  in  these  funds  are  primarily  publicly  traded  on  exchanges  and  have  readily
available price quotes.

There were no transfers between Level  1 and Level 2 during the year ended  December 31,  2014.

Health Care Cost Trend Rate

The health care cost trend rate assumptions for the postretirement benefit plan are as follows:

Health care cost trend rate assumed  for next year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.31% 7.57%
4.50% 4.50%
2029

2029

2014

2013

F-63

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS  (Continued)

A one percentage point change in health care cost  trend rate would have  had the  following effects:

One Percentage
Point

Increase

Decrease

Effect on benefit obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1.0

$0.9

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors defined contribution plans in the U.S., Ireland and certain other countries. Under
these plans, employees are allowed to contribute a portion of their salaries to the plans, and the Company
matches  a  portion  of  the  employee  contributions.  The  Company  contributed  $20.5  million,  $16.4  million
and  $2.8  million  to  these  plans  in  the  years  ended  December  31,  2014,  2013  and  2012,  respectively.  The
increase in the Company’s costs associated with the defined contribution plans in 2013 as compared to 2012
was driven by the plans assumed as part of the B&L Acquisition in August 2013 and the Medicis acquisition
in December 2012.

14. SECURITIES REPURCHASES AND SHARE  ISSUANCE

Securities Repurchase Programs

On November 3, 2011, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a new securities
repurchase  program  (the  ‘‘2011  Securities  Repurchase  Program’’).  Under  the  2011  Securities  Repurchase
Program, which commenced on November 8, 2011, the Company could make purchases of up to $1.5 billion
of  its  convertible  notes,  senior  notes,  common  shares  and/or  other  future  debt  or  shares.  The  2011
Securities Repurchase Program terminated on November 7, 2012.

On November 19, 2012, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a new securities
repurchase  program  (the  ‘‘2012  Securities  Repurchase  Program’’).  Under  the  2012  Securities  Repurchase
Program,  which  commenced  on  November  15,  2012,  the  Company  could  make  purchases  of  up  to
$1.5  billion  of  senior  notes,  common  shares  and/or  other  future  debt  or  shares.  The  2012  Securities
Repurchase Program terminated on November 14, 2013.

On November 21, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new securities repurchase program
(the  ‘‘2013  Securities  Repurchase  Program’’).  Under  the  2013  Securities  Repurchase  Program,  which
commenced  on  November  22,  2013,  the  Company  could  make  purchases  of  up  to  $1.5  billion  of  its
convertible  notes,  senior  notes,  common  shares  and/or  other  future  debt  or  shares.  The  2013  Securities
Repurchase Program terminated on November 21, 2014.

On November 20, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a new securities repurchase program
(the  ‘‘2014  Securities  Repurchase  Program’’).  Under  the  2014  Securities  Repurchase  Program,  which
commenced  on  November  21,  2014,  the  Company  may  make  purchases  of  up  to  $2.0  billion  of  its  senior
notes,  common  shares  and/or  other  securities  prior  to  the  completion  of  the  program,  subject  to  any
restrictions  in  the  Company’s  financing  agreements  and  applicable  law.  The  2014  Securities  Repurchase
Program will terminate on November 20, 2015 or at such time as the Company completes its purchases. The
amount  of  securities  to  be  purchased  and  the  timing  of  purchases  under  the  2014  Securities  Repurchase
Program  may  be  subject  to  various  factors,  which  may  include  the  price  of  the  securities,  general  market
conditions,  corporate  and  regulatory  requirements,  alternate  investment  opportunities  and  restrictions
under our financing agreements and applicable law. The securities to be repurchased will be funded using
our  cash resources.

F-64

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

14. SECURITIES REPURCHASES AND SHARE  ISSUANCE (Continued)

The  Board  of  Directors  also  approved  a  sub-limit  under  the  2014  Securities  Repurchase  Program  for  the
repurchase of an amount of common shares equal to the greater of 10% of the Company’s public float or
5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares, in each case calculated as of the date of the
commencement of the 2014 Securities Repurchase Program. The Company may initially purchase up to 5%
of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares, calculated as of the date of the commencement
of  the  2014  Securities  Repurchase  Program,  through  the  facilities  of  the  New  York  Stock  Exchange
(‘‘NYSE’’). Subject to completion of appropriate filings with and approval by the Toronto Stock Exchange
(‘‘TSX’’),  the  Company  may  also  make  purchases  of  its  common  shares  over  the  facilities  of  the  TSX.
Purchases of common shares will be made at prevailing market prices of such shares on the NYSE or the
TSX, as the case may be, at the time of the acquisition and shall be made in accordance with the respective
rules and guidelines of the NYSE and  the TSX and  applicable law.

Share Repurchases

In  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014  and  2013,  no  common  shares  were  repurchased  under  the  2013
Securities Repurchase Program or the  2014  Securities  Repurchase  Program.

In  the  year  ended  December  31,  2013,  under  the  2012  Securities  Repurchase  Program,  the  Company
repurchased 507,957 of its common shares for an aggregate purchase price of $35.7 million. The excess of
the purchase price over the carrying value of the common shares repurchased of $25.8 million was charged
to the accumulated deficit. These common shares were subsequently  cancelled.

In  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012,  under  the  2011  Securities  Repurchase  Program,  the  Company
repurchased 5,257,454 of its common shares for an aggregate purchase price of $280.7 million. The excess
of  the  purchase  price  over  the  carrying  value  of  the  common  shares  repurchased  of  $178.4  million  was
charged to the accumulated deficit. These  common  shares  were subsequently cancelled.

Additional Repurchases outside the 2012 Securities Repurchase  Program

In  addition  to  the  repurchases  made  under  the  2012  Securities  Repurchase  Program,  during  the  second
quarter of 2013, the Company repurchased an additional 217,294 of its common shares on behalf of certain
members of the Company’s Board of Directors, in connection with the share settlement of certain deferred
stock  units  and  restricted  stock  units  held  by  such  directors  following  the  termination  of  the  applicable
equity  program.  These  common  shares  were  subsequently  transferred  to  such  directors.  These  common
shares were repurchased for an aggregate purchase price of $19.9 million. The excess of the purchase price
over the carrying value of the common shares repurchased of $15.6 million was charged to the accumulated
deficit.  As  the  common  shares  were  repurchased  on  behalf  of  certain  of  the  Company’s  directors,  these
repurchases were not made under the 2012  Securities  Repurchase Program.

Issuance of Common Stock

On  June  24,  2013,  the  Company  completed,  pursuant  to  an  Underwriting  Agreement  with  Goldman
Sachs & Co. and Goldman Sachs Canada, Inc., a public offering for the sale of 27,058,824 of its common
shares,  no  par  value,  at  a  price  of  $85.00  per  share,  or  aggregate  gross  proceeds  of  approximately
$2.3  billion.  In  connection  with  the  issuance  of  these  new  common  shares,  the  Company  incurred
approximately $30.7 million of issuance costs, which has been reflected as reduction to the gross proceeds
from the equity issuance.

F-65

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

15. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

In May 2014, shareholders approved the Company’s 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the ‘‘2014 Plan’’) which
replaced the Company’s 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the ‘‘2011 Plan’’) for future equity awards granted
by the Company. The Company transferred the common shares available under the 2011 Plan to the 2014
Plan. The maximum number of common shares that may be issued to participants under the 2014 Plan is
equal to 18,000,000 common shares, plus the number of common shares under the 2011 Plan reserved but
unissued and not underlying outstanding awards and the number of common shares becoming available for
reuse after awards are terminated, forfeited, cancelled, exchanged or surrendered under the 2011 Plan and
the  Company’s  2007  Equity  Compensation  Plan.  The  Company  registered,  in  the  aggregate,  20,000,000
common shares of common stock for issuance under the 2014 Plan. Approximately 17,505,663 shares were
available  for  future  grants  as  of  December  31,  2014.  The  Company  uses  reserved  and  unissued  common
shares to satisfy its obligation under its  share-based compensation plans.

The  following  table  summarizes  the  components  and  classification  of  share-based  compensation  expense
related to stock options and RSUs:

Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RSUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$18.2
60.0

$17.3
28.2

$21.7
44.5

Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$78.2

$45.5

$66.2

Research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 5.6
72.6

$ — $ 0.7
65.5

45.5

Share-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$78.2

$45.5

$66.2

2014

2013

2012

The  increase  in  share-based  compensation  expense  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014  was  driven
primarily  by  (i)  the  incremental  compensation  expense  related  to  the  higher  fair  value  for  share-based
awards  granted  in  2014  and  (ii)  the  impact  of  the  accelerated  vesting  in  the  first  half  of  2014  related  to
certain performance-based RSU awards.

In addition, in the second quarter of 2013, certain equity awards held by current non-management directors
were modified from units settled in common shares to units settled in cash, which changed the classification
from  equity  awards  to  liability  awards.  The  resulting  reduction  in  share-based  compensation  expense  of
$5.8 million was more than offset by incremental compensation expense of $21.3 million recognized in the
second  quarter  of  2013,  which  represents  the  fair  value  of  the  awards  settled  in  cash.  As  the  modified
awards  were  fully  vested  and  paid  out,  no  additional  compensation  expense  will  be  recognized  in
subsequent periods. The decrease in share-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31,
2013 was also driven by the impact of forfeitures and the accelerated vesting that was triggered in the prior
year related to certain performance-based RSU awards.

The Company recognized $17.1 million, $24.2 million, and $12.5 million of tax benefits from stock options
exercised in the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and  2012 respectively.

Stock Options

All  stock  options  granted  by  the  Company  under  its  2007  Equity  Compensation  Plan  expire  on  the  fifth
anniversary of the grant date and all stock options granted under the 2011 Plan and 2014 Plan expire on the
tenth  anniversary  of  the  grant  date.  The  exercise  price  of  any  stock  option  granted  under  its  2007  Equity
Compensation  Plan  is  not  to  be  less  than  the  volume-weighted  average  trading  price  of  the  Company’s

F-66

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

15. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

common  shares  for  the  five  trading  days  immediately  preceding  the  date  of  grant  (or,  for  participants
subject  to  U.S.  taxation,  on  the  single  trading  day  immediately  preceding  the  date  of  grant,  whichever  is
greater). The exercise price of any stock option granted under the 2011 Plan and 2014 Plan will not be less
than the closing price per common share preceding the date of grant. Stock options generally vest 25% each
year over a four-year period on the anniversary of the date of grant.

The fair values of all stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were
estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-
average assumptions:

2014

2013

2012

Expected stock option life (years)(1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected volatility(2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield(4)

4.0
43.0% 40.1% 44.9%
1.8% 1.0% 0.5%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —% —% —%

5.8

4.0

(1) Determined based on historical exercise and forfeiture patterns.

(2) Determined based on implied volatility in the market traded options of the Company’s common stock.

(3) Determined  based  on  the  rate  at  the  time  of  grant  for  zero-coupon  U.S.  or  Canadian  government  bonds  with  maturity  dates

equal to  the expected life of the stock option.

(4) Determined based on the stock option’s exercise  price and expected annual dividend rate at the time of grant.

The  Black-Scholes  option-pricing  model  used  by  the  Company  to  calculate  stock  option  values  was
developed  to  estimate  the  fair  value  of  freely  tradeable,  fully  transferable  stock  options  without  vesting
restrictions,  which  significantly  differ  from  the  Company’s  stock  option  awards.  This  model  also  requires
highly subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time until exercise, which
greatly affect the calculated values.

The following table summarizes stock option  activity during the year  ended  December 31, 2014:

Outstanding, January 1, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expired or forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding, December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Vested and exercisable, December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 30.19
117.82
21.78
74.88

$ 31.44

$ 17.75

Options

8.6
0.3
(0.8)
(0.4)

7.7

5.7

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

4.8

4.0

$852.6

$720.6

The  weighted-average  fair  values  of  all  stock  options  granted  in  2014,  2013  and  2012  were  $62.15,  $30.47
and $19.57, respectively. The total intrinsic values of stock options exercised in 2014, 2013 and 2012 were
$87.4  million,  $30.4  million  and  $25.1  million,  respectively.  Proceeds  received  on  the  exercise  of  stock
options in 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $17.2 million, $10.0 million and  $23.0 million, respectively.

F-67

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

15. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

As  of  December  31,  2014,  the  total  remaining  unrecognized  compensation  expense  related  to  non-vested
stock  options  amounted  to  $42.2  million,  which  will  be  amortized  over  the  weighted-average  remaining
requisite service period of approximately 3.4 years. The total fair value of stock options vested in 2014 was
$36.3 million (2013 — $26.0 million; 2012 —  $36.1 million).

RSUs

RSUs  generally  vest  on  the  third  anniversary  date  from  the  date  of  grant.  Annual  RSUs  granted  to
non-management directors vest immediately prior to the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Pursuant to
the  applicable  unit  agreement,  certain  RSUs  may  be  subject  to  the  attainment  of  any  applicable
performance goals specified by the Board of Directors. If the vesting of the RSUs is conditional upon the
attainment of performance goals, any RSUs that do not vest as a result of a determination that a holder of
RSUs  has  failed  to  attain  the  prescribed  performance  goals  will  be  forfeited  immediately  upon  such
determination.  RSUs  are  credited  with  dividend  equivalents,  in  the  form  of  additional  RSUs,  when
dividends  are  paid  on  the  Company’s  common  shares.  Such  additional  RSUs  will  have  the  same  vesting
dates  and  will  vest  under  the  same  terms  as  the  RSUs  in  respect  of  which  such  additional  RSUs  are
credited.

To the extent provided for in a RSU agreement, the Company may, in lieu of all or a portion of the common
shares which would otherwise be provided to a holder, elect to pay a cash amount equivalent to the market
price  of  the  Company’s  common  shares  on  the  vesting  date  for  each  vested  RSU.  The  amount  of  cash
payment  will  be  determined  based  on  the  average  market  price  of  the  Company’s  common  shares  on  the
vesting  date.  The  Company’s  current  intent  is  to  settle  vested  RSUs  through  the  issuance  of  common
shares.

Time-Based RSUs

Each  vested  RSU  without  performance  goals  (‘‘time-based  RSU’’)  represents  the  right  of  a  holder  to
receive one of the Company’s common shares. The fair value of each RSU granted is estimated based on
the trading price of the Company’s common shares on  the date  of grant.

The following table summarizes non-vested time-based RSU activity during the year ended December 31,
2014:

Non-vested, January 1, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Non-vested, December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted-
Average

Time-Based Grant-Date
Fair  Value

RSUs

0.9
0.1
(0.1)

0.9

$ 39.11
137.71
54.60

$ 51.34

As  of  December  31,  2014,  the  total  remaining  unrecognized  compensation  expense  related  to  non-vested
time-based RSUs amounted to $18.5 million, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining
requisite service period of approximately 2.8 years. The total fair value of time-based RSUs vested in 2014
was $8.1 million (2013 — $15.2 million; 2012  — $18.0 million).

F-68

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

15. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

Performance-Based RSUs

Each vested RSU with performance goals (‘‘performance-based RSU’’) represents the right of a holder to
receive a number of the Company’s common shares up to a specified maximum. Performance-based RSUs
vest  upon  achievement  of  certain  share  price  appreciation  conditions.  If  the  Company’s  performance  is
below a specified performance level, no  common shares will be paid.

The fair value of each performance-based RSU granted during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013
and  2012  was  estimated  using  a  Monte  Carlo  simulation  model,  which  utilizes  multiple  input  variables  to
estimate the probability that the performance condition will be achieved.

The fair values of performance-based RSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and
2012 were estimated with the following  assumptions:

2014

2013

2012

Contractual term (years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected Company share volatility(1) . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate(2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.6 – 6.3

2.8 – 4.3
38.7% – 45.4% 36.1% – 44.4% 42.5% – 52.3%
0.6% – 1.0%
0.5% – 1.3%
0.8% – 2.3%

2.9 – 4.3

(1) Determined based on historical volatility over the contractual  term of the performance-based RSU.

(2) Determined  based  on  the  rate  at  the  time  of  grant  for  zero-coupon  U.S.  government  bonds  with  maturity  dates  equal  to  the

contractual term of the performance-based RSUs.

The  following  table  summarizes  non-vested  performance-based  RSU  activity  during  the  year  ended
December 31, 2014:

Non-vested, January 1, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Non-vested, December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted-
Average

Performance- Grant-Date
Fair Value
Based RSUs

1.0
0.5
(0.2)
(0.1)

1.2

$102.22
219.79
61.80
136.59

$160.44

As  of  December  31,  2014,  the  total  remaining  unrecognized  compensation  expense  related  to  the
non-vested  performance-based  RSUs  amounted  to  $128.9  million,  which  will  be  amortized  over  the
weighted-average  remaining  requisite  service  period  of  approximately  3.1  years.  A  maximum  of  3,065,374
common  shares  could  be  issued  upon  vesting  of  the  performance-based  RSUs  outstanding  as  of
December 31, 2014.

F-69

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

16. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss income as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
were as follows:

Net
Unrealized
Holding
Gain
Unrealized on Available- on Available-
For-Sale
Equity
Securities

Net
Unrealized
Holding
Loss

Gain on
Equity
Investment

For-Sale
Debt
Securities

Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustment

Balance, January 1, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale equity  securities
Reclassification to net income (loss)(1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension adjustment(2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(280.5)
161.0
—
—
—

Balance, December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(119.5)

Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale equity  securities
Reclassification to net income (loss)(1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension adjustment, net of tax(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(50.8)
—
—
—

Balance, December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(170.3)

$ —
—
—
—
—

—

—
—
—
—

—

Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gain on equity method investment, net of tax . . . . . .
Reclassification to net income (loss)(1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale equity securities,
net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassification to net income (loss)(1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension adjustment, net of tax(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(716.2)
—
—

—
—
—

—
51.3
(51.3)

—
—
—

$ 1.6
—
0.4
(1.6)
—

0.4

—
3.6
(4.0)
—

—

—
—
—

1.8
(1.8)
—

$(0.2)
—
—
0.2
—

—

—
—
—
—

—

—
—
—

—
—
—

Pension
Adjustment

Total

$ (0.5)
—
—
—

0.2

$(279.6)
161.0
0.4
(1.4)
0.2

(0.3)

(119.4)

—
—
—
37.8

37.5

—
—
—

—
—
(66.9)

(50.8)
3.6
(4.0)
37.8

(132.8)

(716.2)
51.3
(51.3)

1.8
(1.8)
(66.9)

Balance, December 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(886.5)

$ —

$—

$—

$(29.4)

$(915.9)

(1)

Included in gain on investments, net.

(2) Reflects  changes  in  defined  benefit  obligations  and  related  plan  assets  of  the  Company’s  defined  benefit  pension  plans  and  the  U.S.

postretirement benefit plan (as described in  note 13).

Income taxes are not provided for foreign currency translation adjustments arising on the translation of the
Company’s  operations  having  a  functional  currency  other  than  the  U.S.  dollar.  Income  taxes  allocated  to
reclassification adjustments were not  material.

17. INCOME TAXES

The components of income (loss) before provision for (recovery  of) income taxes were as follows:

Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (851.1) $ (574.5) $(205.6)
(188.6)
1,943.7

(739.9)

$1,092.6

$(1,314.4) $(394.2)

2014

2013

2012

F-70

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

17. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

The components of provision for (recovery of) income taxes were as follows:

Current:

Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Deferred:

Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2014

2013

2012

$
0.6
150.1

150.7

$

3.4
80.0

83.4

$

7.2
56.3

63.5

—
29.7

29.7

—
(534.2)

(11.9)
(329.8)

(534.2)

(341.7)

$180.4

$(450.8) $(278.2)

The reported net book provision for (recovery of) income taxes differs from the expected amount calculated
by  applying  the  Company’s  Canadian  statutory  rate  to  income  (loss)  before  provision  for  (recovery  of)
income taxes. The  reasons for this difference and the  related tax effects  are as follows:

2014

2013

2012

Income (loss) before provision for (recovery of)  income taxes . . . . . . . .
Expected Canadian statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,092.6
26.9%

$(1,314.4) $(394.2)
26.9% 26.9%

Expected provision for (recovery) of income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-deductible amounts:

Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Merger and acquisition costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In-process research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-taxable gain on disposal of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in enacted income tax rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canadian dollar foreign exchange gain  for  Canadian tax purposes . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits  and net

293.9

(353.6)

(106.0)

—
19.8
—
—
(50.1)
29.7
22.8

—

13.1
1.1

—
—

6.6
0.6

6.2
6.3
24.2
3.2
(3.1)
(4.5)
9.1

operating losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17.4

70.2

—

Change in valuation allowance on Canadian deferred tax assets and tax

rate changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign tax rate differences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized income tax benefit of  losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Withholding taxes on foreign income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alternative minimum and other taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taxable foreign income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax  benefit on intra-entity transfers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

255.2
(1.8)
(502.8)
—

3.7

—
269.0
(147.3)
(29.1)

143.9
—
(407.6)
—

3.4

—

55.4
(5.7)
21.8

(34.2)
15.4
(226.8)
32.0
8.0
(4.5)
10.7
(10.4)
(3.8)

$ 180.4

$ (450.8) $(278.2)

F-71

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

17. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

The tax effect of major items recorded  as deferred  tax  assets and liabilities is as follows:

2014

2013

Deferred tax assets:

Tax  loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax  credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Scientific Research and Experimental  Development pool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plant, equipment and technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred financing and share issue costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

958.3
234.9
58.2
90.5
369.9
2.8
13.5
209.4
49.8
38.2

$

957.7
126.4
62.9
83.7
577.5
38.3
12.5

—

43.0
76.5

Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,025.5
(859.2)

1,978.5
(477.6)

Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,166.3

1,500.9

Deferred tax liabilities:

Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outside basis differences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred financing and share issue costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

520.0
2,636.6
—

0.6

2,884.3
563.8
16.6
(0.4)

Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,157.2

3,464.3

Net deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(1,990.9) $(1,963.4)

The  Company  effected  an  internal  reorganization  in  December  2013  to  streamline  and  integrate  certain
aspects  of  its  operations.  As  part  of  this  internal  reorganization,  the  Company  migrated  certain  of  its
intellectual property to a foreign holding company operating in Ireland and Luxembourg. During 2014, the
Company  concluded  certain  additional  steps  relating  to  this  internal  reorganization.  The  2014  steps
required the Company to convert its existing basis differences in the contributed intellectual property to an
outside basis difference.

The  realization  of  deferred  tax  assets  is  dependent  on  the  Company  generating  sufficient  domestic  and
foreign  taxable  income  in  the  years  that  the  temporary  differences  become  deductible.  A  valuation
allowance  has  been  provided  for  the  portion  of  the  deferred  tax  assets  that  the  Company  determined  is
more  likely  than  not  to  remain  unrealized  based  on  estimated  future  taxable  income  and  tax  planning
strategies.  In  2014,  the  valuation  allowance  increased  by  $381.6  million.  The  net  increase  in  valuation
allowance resulted from an increase in losses in Canada and additional foreign tax credits generated by the
Company’s U.S. subsidiaries. In 2013, the valuation allowance increased by $353.1 million. The net increase
in valuation allowance resulted from an increase in valuation allowance associated with historic foreign tax
credits generated by the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries and acquired valuation allowance from B&L. Given
the  Company’s  history  of  pre-tax  losses  and  expected  future  losses  in  Canada,  the  Company  determined
there was insufficient objective evidence to release the remaining valuation allowance against Canadian tax
loss  carryforwards,  International  Tax  Credits  (‘‘ITC’’)  and  pooled  Scientific  Research  and  Experimental
Development Tax Incentive (‘‘SR&ED’’)  expenditures.

F-72

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

17. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had accumulated losses of approximately $1,008.5 million (2013 —
$717.9 million) available for federal and provincial tax purposes in Canada. As of December 31, 2014, the
Company  had  approximately  $39.2  million  (2013  —  $42.3  million)  of  unclaimed  Canadian  ITCs,  which
expire  from  2017  to  2033.  These  losses  and  ITCs  can  be  used  to  offset  future  years’  taxable  income  and
federal  tax,  respectively.  In  addition,  as  of  December  31,  2014,  the  Company  had  pooled  SR&ED
expenditures amounting to approximately $216.2 million (2013 — $232.1 million) available to offset against
future years’ taxable income from its Canadian operations, which may be carried forward indefinitely. As in
past years, a full valuation allowance has been maintained against the net Canadian deferred tax assets of
$572.0 million (2013 — $253.6 million).

As  of  December  31,  2014,  the  Company  has  accumulated  tax  losses  of  approximately  $2,380.3  million
(2013 — $2,425.1 million) for U.S. federal income tax purposes which expire between 2021 and 2034. While
the losses are subject to multiple annual loss limitations, the Company believes that the recoverability of the
deferred  tax  assets  associated  with  the  losses  is  more  likely  than  not  to  be  realized.  As  of  December  31,
2014,  the  Company  had  approximately  $71.3  million  (2013  —  $64.7  million)  of  U.S.  research  and
development  credits,  which  expire  between  2021  and  2034.  As  of  December  31,  2014,  the  Company  had
approximately  $167.2  million  in  foreign  tax  credits  recognized  on  tax  returns  for  which  a  full  valuation
allowance  has  been  established  as  they  are  not  expected  to  be  utilized  before  their  expiration.  The
Company’s accumulated losses are subject to annual limitations as a result of previous ownership changes
that  have  occurred.  Included  in  the  $2,380.3  million  of  tax  losses  is  approximately  $95.5  million  of  losses
related to the exercise of non-qualified  stock options and restricted stock  awards.

The  Company  accrues  for  U.S.  tax  on  the  unremitted  earnings  of  the  foreign  subsidiaries  owned  by  the
Company’s U.S. subsidiaries. In addition, the Company provides for the tax on the unremitted earnings of
its direct foreign affiliates except for its direct U.S. subsidiaries. The Company continues to assert that the
unremitted earnings of its U.S. subsidiaries will be permanently reinvested and not repatriated to Canada.
As of December 31, 2014 the Company estimates there will be no Canadian tax liability attributable to the
permanently reinvested U.S. earnings.

As of December 31, 2014, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties)
was $345.0 million (2013 — $247.5 million), of which $108.7 million (2013 — $153.4 million) would affect
the effective tax rate. The remaining approximately $236.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits would not
impact  the  effective  tax  rate  as  the  tax  positions  are  offset  against  existing  tax  attributes  with  valuation
allowances  or  are  timing  in  nature.  In  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014,  the  Company  recognized  a
$143.0 million (2013 — $132.4 million) increase and a $45.5 million (2013 — $12.8 million) net decrease in
the  amount  of  unrecognized  tax  benefits  related  to  tax  positions  taken  in  the  current  and  prior  years,
respectively.

The  Company  recognizes  interest  accrued  related  to  unrecognized  tax  benefits  and  penalties  in  the
provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 2014, approximately $38.7 million (2013 — $46.4 million)
was accrued for the payment of interest and penalties. In the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company
recognized a reduction of approximately $7.7 million  (2013 — $5.7 million) of interest and  penalties.

The Company and one or more of its subsidiaries file federal income tax returns in Canada, the U.S., and
other foreign jurisdictions, as well as various provinces and states in Canada and the U.S. The Company and
its  subsidiaries  have  open  tax  years  primarily  from  2005  to  2013  with  significant  taxing  jurisdictions
including Canada, and the U.S. These open years contain certain matters that could be subject to differing
interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations, and tax treaties, as they relate to the amount, timing,

F-73

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

17. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

or inclusion of revenues and expenses, or the sustainability of income tax positions of the Company and its
subsidiaries. Certain of these tax years are expected to remain open  indefinitely.

Jurisdiction:

United States — Federal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ireland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Netherlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Open  Years

2011 - 2013
2005 - 2013
2009 - 2013
2011 - 2013
2011 - 2013
2009 - 2013
2009 - 2013
2011 - 2013

Valeant’s  U.S.  consolidated  federal  income  tax  return  for  the  2011  and  2012  tax  years  is  currently  under
exam by the Internal Revenue Service. Valeant remains under examination for various state tax audits in the
U.S. for years 2002 to 2013. The Company is currently under examination by the Canada Revenue Agency
for three separate cycles: (a) years 2005 to 2006, (b) 2007 - 2009, and (c) 2010 through 2012. In February
2013 the Company received a proposed audit adjustment for the years 2005  through 2007. The Company
disagrees  with  the  adjustments  and  has  filed  a  Notice  of  Objection.  The  total  proposed  adjustment  will
result in a loss of tax attributes which are subject to a full valuation allowance and will not result in material
change to the provision for income taxes.

In 2014, the Company’s subsidiaries in Australia were notified that the Australian Tax Office would conduct
a risk review of the 2010 - 2011 tax years.

The  following  table  presents  a  reconciliation  of  the  beginning  and  ending  amounts  of  unrecognized  tax
benefits:

2014

2013

2012

Balance, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of B&L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of Medicis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions based on tax positions related to the current  year . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions for tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reductions for tax positions of prior  years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lapse of statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$247.5
—
—
143.0
12.8
(50.2)
(8.1)

$128.0
52.2
—
60.7
19.4
(10.8)
(2.0)

$102.3
—

6.6
3.5
19.0
(1.4)
(2.0)

Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$345.0

$247.5

$128.0

The Company estimates approximately $4.7 million of the above unrecognized tax benefits will be realized
during the next 12 months.

F-74

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

18. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Earnings  (loss)  per  share  attributable  to  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  for  the  years  ended
December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were  calculated as  follows:

2014

2013

2012

Net income (loss) attributable to Valeant Pharmaceuticals

International, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$913.5

$(866.1) $(116.0)

Basic weighted-average number of common shares  outstanding . . . . . . . . . .
Dilutive  effect of stock options and RSUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted weighted-average number of  common shares outstanding . . . . . . . .

335.4
6.1

341.5

321.0
—

321.0

305.4
—

305.4

Earnings (loss) per share attributable  to  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals

International, Inc.:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2.72

$ (2.70) $ (0.38)

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2.67

$ (2.70) $ (0.38)

In  2013  and  2012,  all  stock  options,  RSUs  and  convertible  notes  were  excluded  from  the  calculation  of
diluted loss per share, as the effect of including them would have been anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of
potential common shares issuable for stock options, RSUs and convertible notes on the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding would have  been as  follows:

Basic weighted-average number of common shares  outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dilutive  effect of stock options and RSUs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dilutive  effect of convertible notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

321.0
6.5

305.4
7.2
0.5

Diluted weighted-average number of  common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

327.5

313.1

In 2014, 2013 and 2012, stock options to purchase approximately 877,000, 1,090,000 and 1,093,000 common
shares  of  the  Company,  respectively,  were  not  included  in  the  computation  of  diluted  earnings  per  share
because the effect would have been anti-dilutive  under the  treasury stock method.

2013

2012

19. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW  DISCLOSURES

Interest and income taxes paid during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

Interest paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$934.0
98.7

$652.9
65.1

$421.0
41.4

As part of an acquisition completed in 2014, the Company effectively settled a pre-existing relationship with
an acquiree. The impact was approximately $122 million, which was reflected as additional purchase price.
There  was  no  impact  to  the  consolidated  statement  of  income  (loss)  or  the  consolidated  statement  of
cash flows.

2014

2013

2012

F-75

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, the Company becomes involved in various legal and administrative proceedings, which
include  product  liability,  intellectual  property,  commercial,  antitrust,  governmental  and  regulatory
investigations, related private litigation and ordinary course employment-related issues. From time to time,
the Company also initiates actions or files counterclaims. The Company could be subject to counterclaims
or  other  suits  in  response  to  actions  it  may  initiate.  The  Company  believes  that  the  prosecution  of  these
actions and counterclaims is important to preserve and protect the Company, its reputation and its assets.
Certain of these proceedings and actions are described below.

Unless  otherwise  indicated,  the  Company  cannot  reasonably  predict  the  outcome  of  these  legal
proceedings,  nor  can  it  estimate  the  amount  of  loss,  or  range  of  loss,  if  any,  that  may  result  from  these
proceedings. An adverse outcome in certain of these proceedings could have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, and could cause the market value of
its  common shares to decline.

Governmental and Regulatory Inquiries

Legacy Biovail Matters

On May 16, 2008, Biovail Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (‘‘BPI’’), the Company’s former subsidiary, entered into a
written  plea  agreement  with  the  U.S.  Attorney’s  Office  (‘‘USAO’’)  for  the  District  of  Massachusetts
whereby it agreed to plead guilty to violating the U.S. Anti-Kickback Statute and pay a fine of $22.2 million.

In  addition,  on  May  16,  2008,  the  Company  entered  into  a  non-prosecution  agreement  with  the  USAO
whereby  the  USAO  agreed  to  decline  prosecution  of  Biovail  Corporation  (‘‘Biovail’’)  in  exchange  for
continuing cooperation and a civil settlement agreement and pay a civil penalty of $2.4 million. A hearing
before the U.S. District Court in Boston  took place on September 14,  2009 and  the plea was approved.

In addition, as part of the overall settlement, Biovail entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement (‘‘CIA’’)
with  the  Office  of  the  Inspector  General  and  the  Department  of  Health  and  Human  Services  on
September  11,  2009.  The  CIA  requires  the  Company  to  have  a  compliance  program  in  place  and  to
undertake  a  set  of  defined  corporate  integrity  obligations  for  a  five-year  term.  The  CIA  also  includes
requirements for an annual independent review of these obligations. Pursuant to the terms of the CIA, the
Company expects the requirements contained in the CIA to terminate by the end of the second quarter of
2015. Failure to comply with the obligations under the CIA  could result in financial penalties.

Civil Investigative Demand from the U.S.  Federal Trade  Commission

On May 2, 2012, Medicis received a civil investigative demand from the FTC requiring that Medicis provide
to the FTC information and documents relating to various settlement and other agreements with makers of
generic  SOLODYN(cid:4)  products  following  patent  infringement  claims  and  litigation,  each  of  which  was
previously  filed  with  the  FTC  and  the  Antitrust  Division  of  the  Department  of  Justice,  and  other  efforts
principally  relating  to  SOLODYN(cid:4).  On  June  7,  2013,  Medicis  received  an  additional  civil  investigative
demand relating to such settlements, agreements and efforts. Medicis is cooperating with this investigative
process. If, at the conclusion of this process, the FTC believes that any of the agreements or efforts violates
antitrust laws, it could challenge Medicis through a civil administrative or judicial proceeding. If the FTC
ultimately challenges the agreements,  we would  expect to vigorously  defend any such  action.

F-76

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

Subpoenas from the New York Office of  Inspector General  for the U.S.  Department of Health
and Human Services

On June 29, 2011, B&L received a subpoena from the New York Office of Inspector General for the U.S.
Department  of  Health  and  Human  Services  regarding  payments  and  communications  between  B&L  and
medical  professionals  related  to  its  pharmaceutical  products  Lotemax(cid:4)  and  Besivance(cid:4).  The  government
has indicated that the subpoena was issued in connection with a civil investigation, and B&L is cooperating
fully with the government’s investigation. B&L has heard of no additional activity at this time, and whether
the government’s investigation is ongoing or will result in further requests for information is unknown. B&L
and  the  Company  will  continue  to  work  with  the  Office  of  Inspector  General  regarding  the  scope  of  the
subpoena and any additional specific  information  that  may be requested.

ISTA Settlement with Department of Justice

On or about May 24, 2013 (prior to the Company’s acquisition of B&L in August 2013), B&L’s subsidiary,
ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (‘‘ISTA’’), reached agreement with the U.S. government to resolve and conclude
civil and criminal allegations against ISTA. The settlement involved conduct by ISTA that occurred between
January  2006  and  March  2011,  prior  to  B&L’s  acquisition  of  ISTA  in  June  2012.  B&L  was  aware  of  the
government investigation prior to its acquisition, and fully cooperated with the government to resolve the
matter.  In  connection  with  the  settlement,  ISTA  pled  guilty  to  certain  charges  and  paid  approximately
$34  million  in  civil  and  criminal  fines,  including  interest  and  attorney’s  fees.  In  addition,  B&L  agreed  to
maintain  a  specified  compliance  and  ethics  program  and  to  annually  certify  compliance  with  this
requirement  to  the  Department  of  Justice  for  a  period  of  three  years.  Failure  to  comply  with  the
requirements of the settlement could  result  in fines.

Securities

Medicis Shareholder Class Actions

Prior to the Company’s acquisition of Medicis, several purported holders of then public shares of Medicis
filed  putative  class  action  lawsuits  in  the  Delaware  Court  of  Chancery  and  the  Arizona  Superior  Court
against Medicis and the members of its Board of Directors, as well as one or both of Valeant and Merlin
Merger  Sub  (the  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of  Valeant  formed  in  connection  with  the  Medicis  acquisition).
The  Delaware  actions  (which  were  instituted  on  September  11,  2012  and  October  1,  2012,  respectively)
were  consolidated  for  all  purposes  under  the  caption  In  re  Medicis  Pharmaceutical  Corporation
Stockholders  Litigation,  C.A.  No.  7857-CS  (Del.  Ch.).  The  Arizona  action  (which  was  instituted  on
September  11,  2012)  bears  the  caption  Swint  v.  Medicis  Pharmaceutical  Corporation,  et.  al.,  Case
No. CV2012-055635 (Ariz. Sup. Ct.). The actions all alleged, among other things, that the Medicis directors
breached  their  fiduciary  duties  because  they  supposedly  failed  to  properly  value  Medicis  and  caused
materially misleading and incomplete information to be disseminated to Medicis’ public shareholders, and
that  Valeant  and/or  Merlin  Merger  Sub  aided  and  abetted  those  alleged  breaches  of  fiduciary  duty.  The
actions also sought, among other things,  injunctive and other  equitable relief, and money damages.

The plaintiff in the Arizona action agreed to dismiss her complaint and, on January 15, 2013, the Arizona
Superior Court issued an order granting the parties’ joint stipulation to dismiss the Arizona action.

The  parties  agreed  to  settle  the  Delaware  action  and,  on  November  25,  2013,  executed  a  Stipulation  and
Agreement  of  Compromise  and  Settlement,  which  provided,  among  other  things,  that  Medicis  and  the
other  defendants  would  not  oppose  plaintiffs’  request  for  a  fee  award  (subject  to  a  capped  amount).  At
the  settlement  hearing  on  February  26,  2014,  the  Delaware  Court  of  Chancery  declined  to  approve  the

F-77

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

settlement or award plaintiffs any attorneys’ fees and the matter was dismissed with prejudice to allow the
plaintiff to revise their fee request, which they have subsequently decided not to bring. The Delaware action
is now concluded.

Obagi Shareholder Class Actions

Prior  to  the  acquisition  of  all  of  the  outstanding  common  stock  of  Obagi,  the  following  complaints  were
filed:  (i)  a  complaint  in  the  Court  of  Chancery  of  the  State  of  Delaware,  dated  March  22,  2013,  and
amended on April 1, 2013 and on April 8, 2013, captioned Michael Rubin v. Obagi Medical Products, Inc.,
et  al.;  (ii)  a  complaint  in  the  Superior  Court  of  the  State  of  California,  County  of  Los  Angeles,  dated
March 22, 2013, and amended on March 27, 2013, captioned Gary Haas v. Obagi Medical Products, Inc., et
al.;  and  (iii)  a  complaint  in  the  Superior  Court  of  the  State  of  California,  County  of  Los  Angeles,  dated
March  27,  2013,  captioned  Drew  Leonard  v.  Obagi  Medical  Products,  Inc.,  et  al.  Each  complaint  is  a
purported shareholder class action and names as defendants Obagi and the members of the Obagi Board of
Directors. The two complaints filed in California also name Valeant and Odysseus Acquisition Corp. (the
wholly-owned  subsidiary  of  Valeant  formed  in  connection  with  the  Obagi  acquisition)  as  defendants.  The
plaintiffs’  allegations  in  each  action  are  substantially  similar.  The  plaintiffs  allege  that  the  members  of
the Obagi Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties to Obagi’s stockholders in connection with the
sale  of  the  company,  and  the  California  complaints  further  allege  that  Obagi,  Valeant  and  Odysseus
Acquisition  Corp.  aided  and  abetted  the  purported  breaches  of  fiduciary  duties.  In  support  of  their
purported  claims,  the  plaintiffs  allege  that  the  proposed  transaction  undervalued  Obagi,  involved  an
inadequate sales process and included preclusive deal protection devices. The plaintiffs in the Rubin case in
Delaware  and  in  the  Haas  case  in  California  also  filed  amended  complaints,  which  added  allegations
challenging the adequacy of the disclosures concerning the transaction. The plaintiffs sought damages and
to enjoin the transaction, and also sought  attorneys’  and expert  fees  and costs.

The parties executed a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release on January 31,
2014, which set forth the terms for the settlement and dismissal of all of the lawsuits and provided, among
other  things,  that  Obagi  and  the  other  defendants  would  not  oppose  plaintiffs’  request  for  a  fee  award
(subject to a capped amount). At a settlement hearing on April 30, 2014, the Delaware Court of Chancery
declined to approve the settlement or award plaintiff any attorneys’ fees. The Delaware Court of Chancery
entered the dismissal of the action with  prejudice as to the  named plaintiffs on October  8, 2014.

On  October  15,  2014,  plaintiffs  in  the  California  actions  sought  voluntary  dismissal  without  prejudice  of
each of those actions without notice to the proposed class. On October 20, 2014, the court in the California
actions granted the request for dismissal of both actions.

Solta Medical Shareholder Class Actions

Prior to the Company’s completion of the acquisition of Solta Medical, several purported holders of then
public shares of Solta Medical filed putative class action lawsuits in the Delaware Court of Chancery and
the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda, against Solta Medical and the members
of its board of directors, as well as the Company, Valeant, and Sapphire Subsidiary Corp. (the wholly-owned
subsidiary of Valeant formed in connection with the Solta Medical acquisition). The Delaware actions were
consolidated  for  all  purposes  under  the  caption  In  re  Solta  Medical,  Inc.  Stockholders  Litigation,  C.A.
No. 9170-CS (Del. Ch.). The California actions were filed under the captions Lathrop v. Covert, et al., Case
No.  HG13-707363  (Cal.  Super.);  Walter,  et  al.  v.  Solta  Medical,  Inc.,  et  al.,  Case  No.  RG13-707659  (Cal.
Super.); and Bushansky v. Solta Medical, Inc., et al., Case No. RG13-707997 (Cal. Super.). The plaintiffs’
allegations  in  each  action  were  substantially  similar.  The  actions  all  alleged,  among  other  things,  that  the

F-78

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

directors of Solta Medical breached their fiduciary duties to the stockholders of Solta Medical in connection
with  the  Company’s  proposed  acquisition  of  Solta  Medical.  In  support  of  their  purported  claims,  the
plaintiffs alleged that the proposed transaction did not appropriately value Solta Medical, was the result of
an inadequate process and included preclusive deal protection devices. The plaintiffs also alleged that the
Schedule 14D-9 filed by Solta Medical on December 23, 2013, in connection with the proposed transaction
contained material omissions and misstatements. The complaints claimed that Solta Medical, the Company,
Valeant,  and  Sapphire  Subsidiary  Corp.  aided  and  abetted  the  purported  breaches  of  fiduciary  duty.  The
actions  sought,  among  other  things,  injunctive  and  other  equitable  relief,  and  money  damages.  The
plaintiffs  also  sought  attorneys’  and  expert  fees  and  costs.  On  July  10,  2014,  the  parties  entered  into  a
Stipulation  and  Agreement  of  Compromise,  Settlement  and  Release,  which  provides  for  a  release  and
settlement by Solta Medical’s stockholders of all claims against Solta Medical and the other defendants and
their  respective  affiliates  and  agents  in  connection  with  the  Company’s  acquisition  of  Solta  Medical.  In
connection  with  the  proposed  settlement,  the  plaintiffs  sought  an  award  of  attorneys’  fees  and  expenses.
Pursuant to the scheduling order, a settlement hearing was held on September 29, 2014 and the settlement
was approved by the Court.

Allergan Securities Litigation

On August 1, 2014, Allergan commenced the federal securities litigation in the U.S. District Court for the
Central  District  of  California  against  the  Company,  Valeant,  Valeant’s  subsidiary  AGMS  Inc.  (‘‘AGMS’’),
Pershing  Square,  PS  Management,  GP,  LLC,  PS  Fund  1,  LLC  (‘‘PS  Fund  1’’)  and  William  A.  Ackman
(Allergan, Inc. et al. v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., et al., Case No. 14-cv-01214-DOC). The
lawsuit  alleges  violations  of  Sections  13(d),  14(a),  14(e)  and  20A  of  the  Exchange  Act  and  rules
promulgated by the SEC under those Sections. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a declaration that
the defendants violated Rule 14e-3 and Sections 13(d), 14(a) and 14(e); an order requiring rescission of the
defendants’  purchases  of  Allergan  securities;  an  order  requiring  the  defendants  to  file  corrective
disclosures; preliminary and/or permanent injunctive relief as may be necessary to prevent the defendants
from enjoying any rights or benefits from Allergan securities that were acquired unlawfully and to prevent
irreparable  injury  to  Allergan  or  its  stockholders  arising  out  of  unlawful  solicitations;  damages  under
Section 20A of the Exchange Act; and costs and attorneys’ fees. On August 19, 2014, the Company, Valeant
and  AGMS  filed  an  Answer  to  Complaint  and  Affirmative  Defenses.  The  remaining  defendants  filed  a
separate answer on August 19, 2014. Also on August 19, 2014, the Company, Valeant, AGMS, PS Fund 1
and William A. Ackman filed Counterclaims against Allergan and the members of the Allergan Board of
Directors. The Counterclaims allege violations of Sections 14(a), 14(e) and 20A of the Exchange Act and
rules promulgated by the SEC under those Sections, and seek, among other relief, an injunction requiring
Allergan to issue corrective disclosures; an order enjoining further violations of Sections 14(a) and 14(e) of
the Exchange Act and SEC Rules 14a-9 and 14a-3, and costs and attorneys’ fees. On September 2, 2014, the
counterclaim-defendants filed an Answer to the Counterclaims. On November 4, 2014, the Court denied in
part and granted in part a motion filed by plaintiffs seeking a preliminary injunction. The Court directed the
defendants  to  make  certain  additional  disclosures,  and  otherwise  denied  the  motion.  On  December  26,
2014,  the  defendants  moved  for  summary  judgment  as  to  all  of  Allergan’s  claims  and  all  of  plaintiff
Parschauer’s claims except for certain of her Rule 14e-3 and Section 20A claims. A hearing on the motion is
set  for  March  23,  2015.  On  January  28,  2015,  the  plaintiffs  filed  an  amended  complaint,  alleging  that  all
defendants  violated  Section  14(e)  of  the  Exchange  Act  and  SEC  rules  under  that  section.  The  amended
complaint  also  asserts  violations  of  Sections  13(d)  and  Schedule  13D  thereunder  and  Section  20A  of  the
Exchange  Act  against  Pershing  Square  Capital  Management,  L.P.,  PS  Management,  GP,  LLC,  PS  Fund  1
and  William  A.  Ackman.  The  amended  complaint  seeks  substantially  the  same  relief  as  the  original

F-79

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

complaint. Defendants have not yet responded to the amended complaint. Trial is set for June 28, 2016. The
Company is vigorously defending this matter.

Allergan Shareholder Class Action

On December 16, 2014, Anthony Basile filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company, Valeant,
AGMS, Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P., PS Management, GP, LLC, PS Fund 1 and William A.
Ackman in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Basile v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals
International, Inc., et al., Case No. 14-cv-02004-DOC). The complaint alleges claims on behalf of a putative
class  of  purchasers  of  Allergan  securities  between  February  25,  2014  and  April  21,  2014,  against  all
defendants  asserting  violations  of  Sections  14(e)  of  the  Exchange  Act  and  rules  promulgated  by  the  SEC
thereunder.  The  complaint  also  alleges  violations  of  Section  20A  of  the  Exchange  Act  against  Pershing
Square  Capital  Management,  L.P.,  PS  Management,  GP,  LLC,  PS  Fund  1  and  William  A.  Ackman.  The
complaint  seeks,  among  other  relief,  money  damages,  equitable  relief,  and  attorneys’  fees  and  costs.
Defendants have not yet responded to the Complaint. The Company is vigorously defending this matter.

Antitrust
Solodyn(cid:4)  Antitrust Class Actions

On July 22, 2013, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and
Welfare  Fund,  filed  a  civil  antitrust  class  action  complaint  in  the  United  States  District  Court  for  the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:13-CV-04235-JCJ, against Medicis, the Company and various
manufacturers  of  generic  forms  of  Solodyn(cid:4),  alleging  that  the  defendants  engaged  in  an  anticompetitive
scheme to exclude competition from the market for minocycline hydrochloride extended release tablets, a
prescription  drug  for  the  treatment  of  acne  marketed  by  Medicis  under  the  brand  name,  Solodyn(cid:4).  The
plaintiff  further  alleges  that  the  defendants  orchestrated  a  scheme  to  improperly  restrain  trade,  and
maintain, extend and abuse Medicis’ alleged monopoly power in the market for minocycline hydrochloride
extended release tablets to the detriment of plaintiff and the putative class of end-payor purchasers it seeks
to  represent,  causing  them  to  pay  overcharges.  Plaintiff  alleges  violations  of  Sections  1  and  2  of  the
Sherman  Act,  15  U.S.C.  §§  1,  2,  and  of  various  state  antitrust  and  consumer  protection  laws,  and  further
alleges  that  defendants  have  been  unjustly  enriched  through  their  alleged  conduct.  Plaintiff  seeks
declaratory  and  injunctive  relief  and,  where  applicable,  treble,  multiple,  punitive  and/or  other  damages,
including  attorneys’  fees.  Additional  class  action  complaints  making  similar  allegations  against  all
defendants, including Medicis and the Company have been filed in various courts by other private plaintiffs
purporting  to  represent  certain  classes  of  similarly-situated  direct  or  end-payor  purchasers  of  Solodyn(cid:4)
(Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Case No. 2:13-CV-04270-JCJ (E.D. Pa. filed July 23, 2013); Local 274
Health  &  Welfare  Fund,  Case  No.  2:13-CV-4642-JCJ  (E.D.Pa.  filed  Aug.  9,  2013);  Sheet  Metal  Workers
Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, Case No. 2:13-CV-4659-JCJ (E.D. Pa. filed Aug. 8, 2013); Fraternal
Order  of  Police,  Fort  Lauderdale  Lodge  31,  Insurance  Trust  Fund,  Case  No.  2:13-CV-5021-JCJ  (E.D.  Pa.
filed Aug. 27, 2013); Heather Morgan, Case No. 2:13-CV-05097 (E.D. Pa. filed Aug. 29, 2013); Plumbers &
Pipefitters Local 176 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Case No. 2:13-CV-05105 (E.D. Pa. filed Aug. 30, 2013);
Ahold USA, Inc., Case No. 1:13-cv-12225 (D. Mass. filed Sept. 9, 2013); City of Providence, Rhode Island,
Case  No.  2:13-cv-01952  (D.  Ariz.  filed  Sept.  24,  2013);  International  Union  of  Operating  Engineers
Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Case No. 1:13-cv-12435 (D. Mass. filed Oct. 2,
2013); Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-12517 (D. Mass.
filed Oct. 7, 2013); Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund, Case No. 13-cv-06266-JCJ (E.D. Pa. filed Oct. 25,
2013)).  On  August  29,  2013,  International  Union  of  Operating  Engineers  Local  132  Health  and  Welfare

F-80

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

Fund voluntarily dismissed the class action complaint it had originally filed on August 1, 2013, in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California, and on August 30, 2013, re-filed its class action
complaint  in  the  United  States  District  Court  for  the  Eastern  District  of  Pennsylvania  (Case
No. 2:13-cv-05108). The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Health and Welfare Fund
complaint makes similar allegations against all defendants, including Medicis and the Company, and seeks
similar  relief,  to  the  other  end-payor  plaintiff  complaints.  On  February  25,  2014,  on  a  motion  by  Medicis
and the Company, the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (‘‘JPML’’) ordered that the cases pending
outside  the  District  of  Massachusetts  be  transferred  to  the  District  of  Massachusetts,  with  the  consent  of
that  court,  for  coordinated  or  consolidated  pretrial  proceedings  with  the  actions  already  pending  in  that
district.  The  Multi-District  Litigation  (‘‘MDL’’),  captioned  In  re  Solodyn  (Minocycline  Hydrochloride)
Antitrust  Litigation,  Case  No.  1:14-md-02503-DJC,  is  now  pending  before  U.S.  District  Judge  Denise
Casper.  Two  additional  end-payor  actions  have  been  filed  in  the  District  of  Massachusetts  since  the
February  25th  centralization  order:  Allied  Services  Division  Welfare  Fund,  Case  No.  1:14-cv-10786
(D.  Mass.  filed  Mar.  14,  2014);  and  NECA-IBEW  Welfare  Trust  Fund,  Case  No.  1:14-cv-11015  (D.  Mass.
filed  Mar.  19,  2014).  These  cases  have  been  included  in  the  pending  MDL.  On  September  12,  2014,  the
Direct  Purchaser  Plaintiffs  and  the  End-Payor  Plaintiffs  each  filed  a  consolidated  amended  class  action
complaint.  The  Direct  Purchaser  Plaintiffs,  with  the  Defendants’  consent,  subsequently  filed  a  corrected
amended  complaint  on  September  22,  2014.  On  November  24,  2014,  the  Defendants  jointly  moved  to
dismiss  the  Direct  Purchaser  Plaintiffs’  and  the  End  Payor  Plaintiffs’  complaints.  Oral  argument  on  the
Defendants’ motion is scheduled for March 12, 2015. The Company is vigorously defending these actions.

Intellectual Property
Cobalt TIAZAC(cid:4) XC Litigation

On or about August 17, 2012, Valeant International (Barbados) SRL (now Valeant International Bermuda)
(‘‘VIB’’)  and  Valeant  Canada  received  a  Notice  of  Allegation  from  Cobalt  Pharmaceuticals  Company
(‘‘Cobalt’’) with respect to diltiazem hydrochloride 180 mg, 240 mg, 300 mg and 360 mg tablets, marketed in
Canada by Valeant Canada as TIAZAC(cid:4) XC, alleging that Cobalt’s generic form of TIAZAC(cid:4) XC does not
infringe  Canadian  Patent  Nos.  2,242,224,  and  2,307,547  or,  alternatively,  that  the  patents  are  invalid.
Following  an  evaluation  of  the  allegations  in  the  Notice  of  Allegation,  an  application  for  an  order
prohibiting the Minister of Health from issuing a Notice of Compliance to Cobalt was issued in the Federal
Court  of  Canada  on  September  28,  2012  (Case  No.  T-1805-12)  (the  ‘‘Application’’).  On  May  8,  2014,
Valeant Canada, VIB and Cobalt entered into a settlement agreement, which resulted in an adjournment of
the Application until certain events occur and a discontinuance of all remaining proceedings and appeals.

AntiGrippin(cid:4) Litigation

Two  suits  have  been  brought  against  the  Company’s  subsidiary,  Natur  Produkt,  seeking  lost  profits  in
connection  with  the  registration  by  Natur  Produkt  of  its  AntiGrippin  trademark.  The  plaintiffs  in  these
matters allege that Natur Produkt violated Russian competition law by preventing plaintiffs from producing
and  marketing  their  products  under  certain  brand  names.  The  first  matter  (Case  No.  A-56-23056/2013,
Arbitration Court of St. Petersburg) was accepted for proceedings on June 24, 2013 and a hearing was held
on  November  28,  2013.  In  a  decision  dated  December  4,  2013,  the  court  found  in  favor  of  the  plaintiff
(AnviLab)  and  awarded  the  plaintiff  lost  profits  in  the  amount  of  approximately  $50  million.  The
$50  million  charge  was  recognized  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2013  in  Other  (income)  expense  in  the
consolidated statements of income (loss). Natur Produkt appealed this decision, and a hearing in the appeal
proceeding was held on March 16, 2014. The appeal court found in favor of Natur Produkt and dismissed

F-81

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

the plaintiff’s claim in full. Following this decision, the Company concluded that the potential loss was no
longer  probable,  and  therefore  the  $50  million  reserve  was  reversed  in  the  first  quarter  of  2014  in  Other
(income)  expense  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income  (loss).  Anvilab  appealed  the  appeal  court’s
decision to the cassation court. On June 19, 2014, the cassation court resolved that the matter is within the
jurisdiction of the Intellectual Property (IP) court in this instance. The hearing before the IP court was held
on July 30, 2014 and August 1, 2014. The IP court found in favor of the plaintiff and ruled to send the case
for the second review to the court of the first instance, indicating that the court of the first instance should
decide on the amount of damages suffered by Anvilab. Natur Produkt appealed the decision of the IP Court
to  the  Supreme  Court  on  September  15,  2014,  but,  on  October  22,  2014,  the  Supreme  Court  denied  that
appeal and the matter was sent back to the court of first instance for the second review. The first instance
court appointed an expert to provide a report on the claimed lost profit amount. The parties are awaiting
the  expert’s  report.  The  Company  believes  that  the  potential  damages  in  this  matter,  if  any,  are  not
estimable at this time. Natur Produkt intends to continue to vigorously defend this  matter.

Natur Produkt was served with a claim in the second matter (Case No. A-56-38592/2013, Arbitration Court
of  St.  Petersburg)  on  July  16,  2013  by  the  plaintiff  in  that  matter  (ZAO  Tsentr  Vnedreniya  PROTEK
(‘‘Protek’’)). A hearing was held in this matter on September 29, 2013 and, on October 18, 2013, the court
found in favor of Natur Produkt. Protek filed an appeal of the decision on November 26, 2013. A hearing in
the  appeal  proceeding  was  held  on  January  30,  2014  and  the  appeal  court  also  found  in  favor  of  Natur
Produkt. Protek appealed that decision to the cassation court (Case No. A-56-38592/2013) and, on July 7,
2014, the cassation court also found in favor of Natur Produkt. Protek did not exercise its right to appeal the
cassation court decision to the Supreme  Court.

Watson ACANYA(cid:4) Litigation

In  response  to  two  Notices  of  Paragraph  IV  Certification,  dated  September  9,  2013  and  March  13,  2014,
respectively,  received  from  Watson  Laboratories,  Inc.  (‘‘Watson’’),  which  asserted  that  U.S.  Patent
No.  8,288,434  (the  ‘‘‘434  Patent’’)  and  8,633,699  (the  ‘‘699  Patent’’),  respectively,  which  are  listed  in  the
FDA’s Orange Book for Acanya(cid:4) Gel, are either invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the
commercial manufacture, use, sale or importation of Watson’s generic Clindamycin Phosphate and Benzoyl
Peroxide Gel, 1.2%/2.5%, for which an ANDA had been filed, Dow and the Company’s subsidiary, Valeant
Pharmaceuticals  North  America  LLC  (‘‘VPNA’’),  filed  two  suits  against  Watson,  pursuant  to  the  Hatch-
Waxman  Act,  on  October  24,  2013  in  the  U.S.  District  Court  for  the  District  of  New  Jersey  (Case
No. 13-cv-06401-SRC) and on April 25, 2014 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (Case
No. 14-cv-02661), thereby triggering a 30-month stay of the approval of Watson’s ANDA. In the suits, Dow
and  VPNA  allege  infringement  by  Watson  of  one  or  more  claims  of  the  ‘434  Patent  and  ‘699  Patent,
respectively.

On  May  6,  2014,  Watson,  Dow  and  VPNA  entered  into  a  settlement  agreement  to  settle  all  outstanding
patent  litigation  related  to  Watson’s  generic  version  of  Acanya(cid:4)  Gel.  Under  the  terms  of  the  settlement
agreement,  Dow  and  VPNA  will  grant  Watson  a  royalty-bearing  license  to  market  its  generic  version  of
Acanya(cid:4) Gel beginning in July 1, 2018 or earlier under certain  circumstances.

Perrigo ACANYA(cid:4) Litigation

In response to a Notice of Paragraph IV Certification dated October 2, 2013 received from Perrigo Israel
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (‘‘Perrigo’’), which asserted that the ‘434 Patent is either invalid, unenforceable and/or
will  not  be  infringed  by  the  commercial  manufacture,  use,  sale  or  importation  of  Perrigo’s  generic
Clindamycin  Phosphate  and  Benzoyl  Peroxide  Gel,  1.2%/2.5%,  for  which  an  ANDA  had  been  filed,  Dow

F-82

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

and its affiliate, VPNA, filed suit against Perrigo in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
(Case  No.  13-CV-06922-SRC)  on  November  15,  2013,  pursuant  to  the  Hatch-Waxman  Act,  alleging
infringement by Perrigo of one or more claims of the ‘434 Patent, thereby triggering a 30-month stay of the
approval of Perrigo’s ANDA.

On July 30, 2014, Perrigo, Perrigo Company, Dow and VPNA entered into a settlement agreement to settle
all outstanding patent litigation related to Perrigo’s generic version of Acanya(cid:4) Gel. Under the terms of the
settlement agreement, Dow and VPNA will grant Perrigo a royalty-free license to market its generic version
of Acanya(cid:4)  Gel beginning on December 29, 2018 or earlier under  certain circumstances.

Taro ACANYA(cid:4) Litigation

In  response  to  a  Notice  of  Paragraph  IV  Certification  dated  June  29,  2014  received  from  Taro
Pharmaceutical  Sciences  Inc.  (‘‘Taro’’),  which  asserted  that  that  the  ‘434  Patent  and  the  ‘699  Patent  are
either  invalid,  unenforceable  and/or  will  not  be  infringed  by  the  commercial  manufacture,  use,  sale  or
importation of Taro’s generic Clindamycin Phosphate and Benzoyl Peroxide Gel, 1.2%/2.5%, for which an
ANDA had been filed, Dow and VPNA filed suit against Taro in the U.S. District Court for the District of
New Jersey (Case No. 2:14-cv-05079-SRS-CLW) on August 13, 2014, pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act,
alleging  infringement  by  Perrigo  of  one  or  more  claims  of  the  ‘434  and  ‘699  patents,  thereby  triggering  a
30-month stay of the approval of Perrigo’s ANDA.

On September 11, 2014, Taro, Dow and VPNA entered into a settlement agreement to settle all outstanding
patent  litigation  related  to  Taro’s  generic  version  of  Acanya(cid:4)  Gel.  Under  the  terms  of  the  settlement
agreement, Dow and VPNA will grant Taro a royalty-free license to market its generic version of Acanya(cid:4)
Gel beginning on December 29, 2018 or earlier  under certain circumstances.

Allergan Patent Infringement Proceeding —  Restylane-L(cid:4) and Perlane-L(cid:4)

On September 13, 2013, Allergan USA, Inc. and Allergan Industrie, SAS (collectively, ‘‘Allergan’’) filed a
Complaint for Patent Infringement in the United States District Court for the Central District of California
(Case No. SACV13-1436 AG (JPRX)) against the Company and certain of its affiliates, including Medicis.
The complaint alleges that the Company and its affiliates named in the complaint have infringed Allergan’s
U.S.  Patent  No.  8,450,475  (the  ‘‘‘475  Patent’’)  by  selling,  offering  to  sell  and  importing  in  and  into  the
United  States  the  Company’s  Restylane-L(cid:4)  and  Perlane-L(cid:4)  dermal  filler  products.  Allergan  is  seeking  a
permanent  injunction  and  unspecified  damages.  The  matter  is  proceeding  in  the  ordinary  course,  with  a
proposed trial date of July 27, 2015. The products that are the subject of this proceeding were sold by the
Company  as  part  of  the  transaction  with  Galderma  that  was  completed  on  July  10,  2014  (see  note  4
‘‘DIVESTITURES’’); however, the Company and its applicable affiliates remain party to this proceeding.

Lupin PROLENSA(cid:4) Litigation

In  four  Notices  of  Paragraph  IV  Certification  dated  December  19,  2013,  May  13,  2014,  July  3,  2014,  and
December 17, 2014, respectively, each received from Lupin, Ltd. (‘‘Lupin’’), Lupin asserted that U.S. Patent
Nos.  8,129,431  (the  ‘‘‘431  Patent’’),  8,669,290  (the  ‘‘‘290  Patent’’),  8,754,131  (the  ‘‘‘131  Patent’’),  and
8,871,813 (the ‘‘‘813 patent’’), respectively, each of which is listed in the FDA’s Orange Book for Prolensa(cid:4),
are either invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use, sale or
importation of Lupin’s generic bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07%, for which ANDAs had been filed by
Lupin. B&L holds the NDA for Prolensa(cid:4) and Bausch & Lomb Pharma Holdings is the exclusive licensee
of  Senju  Pharmaceutical  Co.,  Ltd.  (‘‘Senju’’)  of  each  of  the  four  patents  licensed  above.  B&L,  Bausch  &

F-83

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

Lomb Pharma Holdings and Senju (collectively, the ‘‘Plaintiffs’’) filed four separate suits against Lupin in
the  U.S.  District  of  New  Jersey,  pursuant  to  the  Hatch-Waxman  Act,  on  January  31,  2014  (Case
No.  1:14-cv-00667-JBS-KMW),  June  26,  2014  (Case  No.  1:14-cv-04149-JBS-KMW),  on  August  15,  2014
(Case  No.  1:14-cv-00667-JBS-KMW)  and  on  January  16,  2015  (Case  No.  1:15-cv-00335-JBS-KMW),  each
relating to one of the above mentioned Notice of Paragraph IV Certifications and, in the case of the fourth
suit, a fifth patent, U.S. No. 8,927,606 (the ‘‘‘606 Patent’’), which issued in January 2015. As a result of these
suits, a 30-month stay of the approval of Lupin’s ANDA for its generic product has been triggered. In each
of the suits, the Plaintiffs alleged infringement by Lupin of one or more claims of each of the ‘431 Patent,
‘290 Patent, ‘131 Patent, the ‘813 Patent and the ‘606 Patent, respectively. Each of the matters is proceeding
in the ordinary course.

Metrics PROLENSA(cid:4) Litigation

Metrics,  Inc.  (‘‘Metrics’’)  filed  an  ANDA  with  the  FDA  seeking  approval  to  market  generic  bromfenac
ophthalmic solution 0.07%, which corresponds to the Company’s Prolensa(cid:4) product. B&L, Bausch & Lomb
Pharma  Holdings  and  Senju  (collectively,  the  ‘‘Plaintiffs’’)  filed  suit  pursuant  to  the  Hatch-Waxman  Act
against  Metrics  and  certain  of  its  affiliated  entities,  namely  Coastal  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  (‘‘Coastal’’),
Mayne  Pharma  Group  Limited  and  Mayne  Pharma  (USA),  Inc.  (collectively,  with  Metrics,  the
‘‘Defendants’’)  on  June  20,  2014,  in  the  U.S.  District  Court  for  the  District  of  New  Jersey  (Case
No.  1:14-cv-03962-JBS-KMW),  thereby  triggering  a  30-month  stay  of  the  approval  of  Metrics’  ANDA.  In
the  suit,  the  Plaintiffs  allege  infringement  by  the  Defendants  of  one  or  more  claims  of  each  of  the  ‘431
Patent, the ‘290 Patent and the ‘131 Patent. Subsequent to the filing of the suit, B&L received, on or about
June  27,  2014,  a  Notice  of  Paragraph  IV  Certification  dated  June  26,  2014  from  Coastal,  related  to  the
Metrics’ ANDA filing described above, asserting that the ‘431 Patent and the ‘290 Patent are either invalid,
unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale
or sale of Metrics’ generic product. On August 14, 2014, Metrics moved to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ action for
an alleged lack of personal jurisdiction, and oral argument on this motion was held on October 3, 2014. A
decision on this motion is pending.

In addition, the Plaintiffs described above filed two protective suits against the Defendants described above
pursuant  to  the  Hatch-Waxman  Act  against  Metrics,  on  August  7,  2014  in  the  U.S.  District  Court  for  the
District  of  New  Jersey  (Case  No.  1:14-cv-04964-JBS-KMW)  and  on  August  8,  2014  in  the  U.S.  District
Court  for  the  District  of  North  Carolina  (Case  No.  4:14-cv-141),  respectively.  In  each  suit,  the  Plaintiffs
allege infringement by the Defendants of one or more claims of each of the ‘431 Patent, the ‘290 Patent and
the ‘131 Patent. These matters are proceeding in the  ordinary  course.

On July 22, 2014, two Notices of Filing Date Accorded papers were issued by the U.S. Patent & Trademark
Office  (‘‘USPTO’’)  for  petitions  filed  by  Metrics  for  Inter  Partes  Reviews  (‘‘IPRs’’)  2014-01041  and
2014-01043, which correspond to the ‘431 Patent and the ‘290 Patent, respectively. A petitioner for IPR may
request  the  USPTO  to  cancel  as  unpatentable  one  or  more  claims  of  a  patent  on  a  ground  that  could  be
raised under 35 USC 102 or 35 USC 103 of the U.S. Patent Act and only on the basis of prior art consisting
of  patents  or  printed  publications.  A  patent  owner  may  file  a  preliminary  response  to  an  IPR  petition  to
provide  reasons  why  no  such  review  should  be  instituted.  A  patent  owner  has  three  months  to  submit  a
preliminary response to an IPR, and a response in these proceedings was filed on November 20, 2014. On
July  10,  2014,  Plaintiffs, 
in  the  U.S.  District  Court  for  the  District  of  New  Jersey  (Case
No. 1:14-cv-03962-JBS-KMW), moved to enjoin the Defendants from prosecuting these two IPRs, and oral
argument on this motion was held on  October  3, 2014.  A decision on  this  motion is pending.

F-84

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)
Innopharma PROLENSA(cid:4) Litigation

Innopharma  Licensing,  Inc.  (‘‘Innopharma’’)  filed  an  ANDA  with  the  FDA  seeking  approval  to  market
generic bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07%, which corresponds to the Company’s Prolensa(cid:4) product. In
response to Innopharma’s Notice of Paragraph IV Certification dated September 19, 2014, B&L, Bausch &
Lomb Pharma Holdings and Senju (collectively, the ‘‘Plaintiffs’’) filed suit pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman
Act  against  Innopharma  and  certain  of  its  affiliated  entities,  namely  Innopharma  Licensing,  LLC,
Innopharma,  Inc.,  and  Innopharma,  LLC  (collectively,  the  ‘‘Defendants’’)  on  November  3,  2014,  in  the
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (Case No. 1:14-cv-06893-JBS-KMW), thereby triggering a
30-month stay of the approval of Innopharma’s ANDA. In the suit, the Plaintiffs allege infringement by the
Defendants  of  one  or  more  claims  of  each  of  the  ‘431  Patent,  the  ‘290  Patent,  the  ‘131  Patent,  and  the
‘813 patent. The matter is proceeding in the  ordinary course.

Apotex PROLENSA(cid:4) Litigation

Apotex,  Inc.  (‘‘Apotex’’)  filed  an  ANDA  with  the  FDA  seeking  approval  to  market  generic  bromfenac
ophthalmic  solution  0.07%,  which  corresponds  to  the  Company’s  Prolensa(cid:4)  product.  In  response  to
Apotex’s  Notice  of  Paragraph  IV  Certification  dated  December  10,  2014,  B&L,  Bausch  &  Lomb  Pharma
Holdings  and  Senju  (collectively,  the  ‘‘Plaintiffs’’)  filed  a  suit  pursuant  to  the  Hatch-Waxman  Act  against
Apotex  and  certain  of  its  affiliated  entities,  namely  Apotex  Corp.  (collectively,  the  ‘‘Defendants’’)  on
(Case
January  16,  2015 
No.1:15-cv-00336-JBS-KMW), which triggered a 30-month stay of the approval of Apotex’s ANDA. In the
suit, Plaintiffs alleges infringement by the Defendants of one or more claims of each of the ‘431 Patent, the
‘290 Patent, the ‘131 Patent, the ‘813 patent, and the ‘606 patent. The matter is proceeding in the ordinary
course.

the  District  of  New  Jersey 

the  U.S.  District  Court 

for 

in 

Paddock PROLENSA(cid:4) Litigation

Paddock Laboratories, LLC (‘‘Paddock’’) filed an ANDA with the FDA seeking approval to market generic
bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.07%, which corresponds to the Company’s Prolensa(cid:4) product. In response
to  Paddock’s  Notice  of  Paragraph  IV  Certification  dated  December  15,  2014,  B&L,  Bausch  &  Lomb
Pharma  Holdings  and  Senju  (collectively,  the  ‘‘Plaintiffs’’)  filed  two  suits  pursuant  to  the  Hatch-Waxman
Act against Paddock and certain of its affiliated entities, namely L. Perrigo Company, and Perrigo Company
(collectively,  the  ‘‘Defendants’’)  on  January  16,  2015  in  the  U.S.  District  Court  for  the  District  of  New
Jersey  (Case  No.  1:15-cv-00337-JBS-KMW)  and  on  January  26,  2015  in  the  U.S.  District  Court  for  the
District  of  Delaware  (Case  No.  1:15-cv-00087-SLR),  which  triggered  a  30-month  stay  of  the  approval  of
Paddock’s ANDA. In the suit, Plaintiffs alleged infringement by the Defendants of one or more claims of
each of the ‘431 Patent, the ‘290 Patent, the ‘131 Patent, the ‘813 patent, and the ‘606 patent. The matter is
proceeding in the ordinary course.

General Civil Actions

Afexa Class Action

On March 9, 2012, a Notice of Civil Claim was filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia which seeks
an order certifying a proposed class proceeding against the Company and a predecessor, Afexa (Case No.
NEW-S-S-140954).  The  proposed  claim  asserts  that  Afexa  and  the  Company  made  false  representations
respecting  Cold-FX(cid:4)  to  residents  of  British  Columbia  who  purchased  the  product  during  the  applicable
period  and  that  the  proposed  class  has  suffered  damages  as  a  result.  On  November  8,  2013,  the  Plaintiff

F-85

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

served  an  amended  notice  of  civil  claim  which  sought  to  re-characterize  the  representation  claims  and
broaden  them  from  what  was  originally  claimed.  On  December  8,  2014,  the  Company  filed  a  motion  to
strike certain elements of the Plaintiff’s claim for failure to state a cause of action. In response, the Plaintiff
proposed further amendments to its claim. The hearing on the motion to strike and the Plaintiff’s amended
claim was held on February 4, 2015 and a decision is pending. The Company denies the allegations being
made and is vigorously defending this  matter.

Employment Matters

Legacy Medicis Employment Matter

In  September,  2011,  Medicis  received  a  demand  letter  from  counsel  purporting  to  represent  a  class  of
female  sales  employees  alleging  gender  discrimination  in,  among  others  things,  compensation  and
promotion as well as claims that the former management group maintained a work environment that was
hostile  and  offensive  to  female  sales  employees.  Related  charges  of  discrimination  were  filed  prior  to  the
end  of  2011  by  six  former  female  sales  employees  with  the  Equal  Employment  Opportunity  Commission
(the  ‘‘EEOC’’).  Three  of  those  charges  have  been  dismissed  by  the  EEOC  and  the  EEOC  has  made  no
findings of discrimination. Medicis engaged in mediation with such former employees and the parties signed
a definitive settlement agreement in this matter, settling the matter on a class-wide basis and resolving all
claims  with  respect  thereto,  including  all  of  the  remaining  related  EEOC  charges.  In  connection  with  the
settlement, Medicis would pay a specified sum, would pay the costs of the claims administration up to an
agreed-upon  fixed  amount  and  would  also  implement  certain  specified  programmatic  relief.  On
September 5, 2013, a putative class action was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in the
matter  of  Brown  et  al.  v.  Medicis  Pharmaceutical  Corporation  (No.  1:13-cv-01345-RJL)  based  on  the
allegations described above. Simultaneously with the filing of the Complaint, the parties filed a motion for
preliminary approval of the class action settlement. A hearing on such motion took place in September 2014
and  the  motion  was  denied.  A  hearing  to  address  the  Court’s  concerns  with  the  motion  for  preliminary
approval  took  place  on  October  23,  2014  and  November  12,  2014.  A  revised  settlement  agreement  and
related  approval  materials  have  now  been  submitted  and  the  parties  are  awaiting  a  settlement  approval
hearing date. The Company has recognized a reserve in its consolidated financial statements covering the
proposed settlement amount, and such amount is not material.

Product  Liability Matters
MoistureLoc(cid:5) Product Liability Lawsuits

Currently,  B&L  has  been  served  or  is  aware  that  it  has  been  named  as  a  defendant  in  approximately  321
currently  active  product  liability  lawsuits  (some  with  multiple  plaintiffs)  pending  in  a  New  York  State
Consolidated Proceeding described below as well as certain other U.S. state courts on behalf of individuals
who claim they suffered personal injury as a result of using a contact lens solution with MoistureLoc(cid:5). Two
consolidated cases were established to handle MoistureLoc(cid:5) claims. First, on August 14, 2006, the Federal
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created a coordinated proceeding in the Federal District Court for
the  District  of  South  Carolina.  Second,  on  January  2,  2007,  the  New  York  State  Litigation  Coordinating
Panel  ordered  the  consolidation  of  cases  filed  in  New  York  State,  and  assigned  the  coordination
responsibilities to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. There are approximately
320  currently  active  non-fusarium  cases  pending  in  the  New  York  Consolidated  Proceeding.  On  July  15,
2009,  the  New  York  State  Supreme  Court  overseeing  the  New  York  Consolidated  Proceeding  granted
B&L’s  motion  to  exclude  plaintiffs’  general  causation  testimony  with  regard  to  non-fusarium  infections,
which effectively excluded plaintiffs from testifying that MoistureLoc(cid:5) caused non-fusarium infections. On

F-86

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

20. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

September 15, 2011, the New York State Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the Trial Court’s
ruling. On February 7, 2012, the New York Court of Appeals denied plaintiffs’ additional appeal. Plaintiffs
subsequently  filed  a  motion  to  renew  the  trial  court’s  ruling,  and  B&L  cross-filed  a  motion  for  summary
judgment  to  dismiss  all  remaining  claims.  On  May  31,  2013,  the  Trial  Court  denied  Plaintiffs’  motion  to
renew,  and  granted  B&L’s  motion  for  summary  judgment,  dismissing  all  remaining  non-fusarium  claims.
On  June  28,  2013,  Plaintiffs  filed  a  Notice  of  Appeal  to  the  Trial  Court’s  ruling.  The  appeal  was  argued
January  20,  2015.  The  Court  issued  its  decision  on  February  10,  2015,  denying  plaintiffs’  appeal  to  renew
and  affirming  the  lower  court’s  decision  granting  B&L’s  motion  for  summary  judgment  regarding  all
remaining non-fusarium claims. Plaintiffs have 30 days from notice of entry of the order in which to move
for leave to appeal.

All matters under jurisdiction of the coordinated proceedings in the Federal District Court for the District
of South Carolina have been dismissed, including  individual actions for personal injury and a class action
purporting  to  represent  a  class  of  consumers  who  suffered  economic  claims  as  a  result  of  purchasing  a
contact lens solution with MoistureLoc(cid:5).
Currently B&L has settled approximately 630 cases in connection with MoistureLoc(cid:5) product liability suits.
All U.S. based fusarium claims have now been resolved and there are less than five active fusarium claims
involving claimants outside of the United States that remain pending. The parties in these active matters are
involved in settlement discussions.

21. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

The  Company  leases  certain  facilities,  vehicles  and  equipment  principally  under  operating  leases.  Rental
expense related to operating lease agreements amounted to $75.0 million, $51.9 million and $22.9 million in
2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 was
driven  primarily  by  incremental  costs  incurred  from  the  full  year  impact  of  the  B&L  Acquisition  (the
acquisition was completed in August 2013). The increase in rental expense for the year ended December 31,
2013 was driven primarily by the B&L Acquisition.

Minimum  future  rental  payments  under  non-cancelable  operating  leases  for  each  of  the  five  succeeding
years ending December 31 and thereafter are as follows:

Lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$195.7

$44.2

$35.7

$28.8

$18.0

$15.7

$53.3

Total

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Thereafter

Other Commitments

The  Company  has  commitments  related  to  capital  expenditures  of  approximately  $70.0  million  as  of
December 31, 2014, primarily related to new manufacturing lines to support the growth of the contact lens
business.

F-87

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

21. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Under  certain  agreements,  the  Company  may  be  required  to  make  payments  contingent  upon  the
achievement  of  specific  developmental,  regulatory,  or  commercial  milestones.  In  connection  with  certain
business combinations, the Company may make contingent consideration payments, as further described in
note  3  and  note  6.  In  addition  to  these  contingent  consideration  payments,  as  of  December  31,  2014,  the
Company  estimates  that  it  may  pay  potential  milestone  payments  and  license  fees,  including  sale-based
milestones,  of  up  to  approximately  $1  billion  over  time,  in  the  aggregate,  to  third-parties,  primarily
consisting of the following:

(cid:127) Under 

the 

terms  of  a  July  2013  collaboration  and  option  agreement  with  Mimetogen
Pharmaceuticals  Inc.  (‘‘Mimetogen’’),  the  Company  will  have  either  the  right  or  the  obligation,
depending on the results of clinical trials, to exercise an option to obtain a worldwide exclusive license to
the  MIM-D3  compound  for  development  and  commercialization  of  products  for  the  treatment  and/or
prevention  of  ocular  conditions,  disorders  and/or  diseases.  The  exercise  of  the  option  would  trigger  an
initial  license  fee  payment  by  the  Company  of  up  to  $95.0  million,  plus  potential  regulatory,
commercialization  and  sales-based  milestones  over  time  of  up  to  $345.0  million,  in  the  aggregate,  and
royalty payments on the future sales.

(cid:127) Under the terms of a March 2010 development and licensing agreement between B&L and NicOx, the
Company has exclusive worldwide rights to develop and commercialize, for certain indications, products
containing latanoprostene bunod, a nitric oxide donating compound for the treatment of glaucoma and
ocular hypertension. The Company may be required to make potential regulatory, commercialization and
sales-based milestones payments over time up to $162.5 million, in the aggregate, as well as royalties on
future sales.

(cid:127) Under the terms of amendments entered into in August 2014 to the agreements with Spear with respect
to the authorized generic for Retin-A(cid:4) and the authorized generic for Carac(cid:4), respectively, the Company
may  be  required  to  make  uncapped  sales-based  milestones  over  time,  which  the  Company  currently
estimates will not exceed $150 million, in  the aggregate, within  the next five years.

(cid:127) Under  the  terms  of  an  October  2013  agreement  with  SMG  Pharmaceuticals,  LLC  (‘‘SMG’’),  the
Company  licensed  the  rights  to  commercialize,  in  specific  fields  in  the  U.S.,  Bensal  HP(cid:4),  a  topical
medication to treat skin irritations and infection. The Company may be required to make potential sales-
based milestone payments over time up to $80.0 million, in the aggregate, as well as royalties on future
sales.

Indemnification Provisions

In  the  normal  course  of  business,  the  Company  enters  into  agreements  that  include  indemnification
provisions  for  product  liability  and  other  matters.  These  provisions  are  generally  subject  to  maximum
amounts,  specified  claim  periods,  and  other  conditions  and  limits.  As  of  December  31,  2014  or  2013,  no
material  amounts  were  accrued  for  the  Company’s  obligations  under  these  indemnification  provisions.  In
addition, the Company is obligated to indemnify its officers and directors in respect of any legal claims or
actions initiated against them in their capacity as officers and directors of the Company in accordance with
applicable  law.  Pursuant  to  such  indemnities,  the  Company  is  indemnifying  certain  former  officers  and
directors in respect of certain litigation and  regulatory  matters.

F-88

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

22. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Reportable Segments

The  Company  has  two  operating  and  reportable  segments:  (i)  Developed  Markets  and  (ii)  Emerging
Markets. The following is a brief description of the Company’s segments:

(cid:127) Developed Markets consists of (i) sales in the U.S. of pharmaceutical products, OTC products, and medical
device products, as well as alliance and contract service revenues, in the areas of eye health, dermatology
and podiatry, aesthetics, and dentistry, (ii) sales in the U.S. of pharmaceutical products indicated for the
treatment  of  neurological  and  other  diseases,  as  well  as  alliance  revenue  from  the  licensing  of  various
products we developed or acquired, and (iii) pharmaceutical products, OTC products, and medical device
products sold in Canada, Australia, New  Zealand, Western Europe and Japan.

(cid:127) Emerging  Markets  consists  of  branded  generic  pharmaceutical  products  and  branded  pharmaceuticals,
OTC products, and medical device products. Products are sold primarily in Central and Eastern Europe
(primarily  Poland  and  Russia),  Asia,  Latin  America  (Mexico,  Brazil,  and  Argentina  and  exports  out  of
Mexico to other Latin American markets), Africa and the Middle East.

Segment  profit  is  based  on  operating  income  after  the  elimination  of  intercompany  transactions.  Certain
costs, such as restructuring and acquisition-related costs, other (income) expense, and in-process research
and  development  impairments  and  other  charges,  are  not  included  in  the  measure  of  segment  profit,  as
management excludes these items in assessing financial  performance.

Corporate  includes  the  finance,  treasury,  tax  and  legal  operations  of  the  Company’s  businesses  and
maintains  and/or  incurs  certain  assets,  liabilities,  expenses,  gains  and  losses  related  to  the  overall
management of the Company, which are not allocated to the other business segments. In addition, a portion
of share-based compensation is considered a corporate cost, since the amount of such expense depends on
Company-wide performance rather than  the operating performance of  any single segment.

F-89

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

22. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

Segment Revenues and Profit

Segment revenues and profit for the  years  ended December  31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

2014

2013

2012

Revenues:

Developed Markets(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging Markets(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$6,167.1
2,096.4

$ 4,293.2
1,476.4

$2,502.3
978.1

Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8,263.5

5,769.6

3,480.4

Segment profit:

Developed Markets(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging Markets(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total segment profit

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring, integration and other  costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In-process research and development impairments and other charges . .
Acquisition-related costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Foreign exchange and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on investments, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,019.7
337.3

2,357.0

(171.1)
(381.7)
(41.0)
(6.3)
14.1
268.7

2,039.7
5.0
(971.0)
(129.6)
(144.1)
292.6

573.2
93.0

666.2

(165.7)
(462.0)
(153.6)
(36.4)
29.2
(287.2)

(409.5)
8.0
(844.3)
(65.0)
(9.4)
5.8

815.9
69.0

884.9

(138.3)
(267.1)
(189.9)
(78.6)
5.3
(136.6)

79.7
6.0
(481.6)
(20.1)
19.7
2.1

Income (loss) before provision for (recovery of)  income taxes . . . . . . . .

$1,092.6

$(1,314.4) $ (394.2)

(1) Developed Markets and Emerging Markets segment revenues reflect (i) incremental product sales revenue in 2014 from all 2013
and all 2014 acquisitions and (ii) incremental product sales revenue in 2013 from all 2012 and all 2013 acquisitions. For further
information,  see  Item  7  titled  ‘‘Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of  Operations  —
Revenues by Segment’’ of this Form 10-K.

(2) Developed Markets segment profit in 2014, 2013 and 2012 reflects the impact of acquisition accounting adjustments related to
the fair value adjustments to inventory and identifiable intangible assets as follows: (i) $906.4 million in 2014, in the aggregate,
(ii) $1,080.4 million in 2013, in the aggregate,  and  (iii)  $506.4 million in 2012, in the aggregate.

Developed Markets segment profit in 2013 also reflects an impairment charge of $551.6 million related to ezogabine/retigabine
in  the  third quarter of 2013 (see note 6 titled ‘‘FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS’’).

(3) Emerging Markets segment profit in 2014, 2013 and 2012 reflects the impact of acquisition accounting adjustments related to the
fair  value  adjustments  to  inventory  and  identifiable  intangible  assets  as  follows:  (i)  $323.9  million  in  2014,  in  the  aggregate,
(ii) $320.5 million in 2013, in the aggregate, and  (iii)  $180.5 million in 2012, in the aggregate.

(4) Corporate reflects non-restructuring-related share-based compensation expense of $40.3 million, $45.5 million and $66.2 million

in  2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

F-90

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

22. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

Segment Assets

Total assets by segment as of December  31,  2014, 2013 and 2012 were  as follows:

Assets(1):

Developed Markets(2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging Markets(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$19,093.4
6,332.9

$20,007.2
6,907.8

$12,893.7
4,022.1

Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

25,426.3
926.7

26,915.0
1,055.8

16,915.8
1,034.6

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$26,353.0

$27,970.8

$17,950.4

2014

2013

2012

(1) The segment assets as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 contain reclassifications between segments to conform to

the current year presentation.

(2) Developed Markets segment assets as of December 31, 2014 reflect (i) the divestiture of facial aesthetic fillers and toxins in July
2014  with  the  carrying  values  of  the  related  assets  of  $1.0  billion,  in  the  aggregate,  (see  note  4  titled  ‘‘DIVESTITURES’’  for
further  information),  (ii)  the  provisional  amounts  of  identifiable  intangible  assets  and  goodwill  of  the  PreCision  acquisition  of
$257.7 million and $170.5 million, respectively, and (iii) the amounts of identifiable intangible assets and goodwill of the Solta
Medical  acquisition  of  $103.5  million  and  $56.4  million,  respectively.  Developed  Markets  segment  assets  as  of  December  31,
2013  reflect  (i)  the  provisional  amounts  of  identifiable  intangible  assets  and  goodwill  of  B&L  of  $3,977.9  million  and
$3,226.7 million, respectively, and (ii) the amounts of identifiable intangible assets and goodwill of Obagi of $335.5 million and
$158.5 million, respectively.

(3) Emerging Markets segment assets as of December 31, 2014 reflect the amounts of identifiable intangible assets and goodwill of
the  Solta  Medical  acquisition  of  $69.4  million  and  $37.8  million,  respectively.  Emerging  Markets  segment  assets  as  of
December 31, 2013 reflect (i) the provisional amounts of identifiable intangible assets and goodwill of B&L of $782.7 million and
$1,135.7  million,  respectively,  and  (ii)  the  amounts  of  identifiable  intangible  assets  and  goodwill  of  Natur  Produkt  of
$104.8 million and $40.9 million, respectively.

F-91

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

22. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

Capital Expenditures, and Depreciation and Amortization,  including Impairments of Finite-Lived
Intangible Assets

Capital  expenditures,  and  depreciation  and  amortization,  including  impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible
assets by segment for the years ended December 31, 2014,  2013 and 2012 were  as follows:

2014

2013

2012

Capital expenditures:

Developed Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 152.7
29.3

$

Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

182.0
109.6

54.1
51.9

106.0
9.3

$ 12.3
61.6

73.9
33.7

Total capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 291.6

$ 115.3

$107.6

Depreciation and amortization, including impairments  of  finite-lived

intangible assets(1):
Developed Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Emerging Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total depreciation and amortization,  including impairments of finite-lived

$1,336.9
385.7

$1,687.7
313.7

$755.1
224.6

1,722.6
15.0

2,001.4
14.4

979.7
6.5

intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,737.6

$2,015.8

$986.2

(1) Depreciation and amortization, including impairments of finite-lived intangible assets in 2014, 2013 and 2012 reflects the impact
of  acquisition  accounting  adjustments  related  to  the  fair  value  adjustment  to  identifiable  intangible  assets  as  follows:  (i)  in
2014 — Developed Markets — $877.6 million; and Emerging Markets — $325.3 million, (ii) in 2013 — Developed Markets —
$773.0  million;  and  Emerging  Markets  —  $255.4  million,  and  (iii)  in  2012  —  Developed  Markets  —  $430.5  million;  and
Emerging Markets — $177.5 million.

Depreciation  and  amortization,  including  impairments  of  finite-lived  intangible  assets  in  2014,  2013  and  2012  also  reflects  the
impairment  charges  and  write-offs  related  to  finite-lived  intangible  assets.  For  more  information  regarding  asset  impairment
charges see note 10 titled ‘‘INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND  GOODWILL’’.

Revenues by Product Category

Revenues by product category for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as  follows:

Pharmaceuticals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Branded and Other Generics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,559.8
1,629.4
1,711.4
1,203.0
159.9

$2,707.8
845.3
1,086.6
1,000.6
129.3

$2,054.5
77.0
475.7
681.4
191.8

$8,263.5

$5,769.6

$3,480.4

2014

2013

2012

F-92

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

22. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

Geographic Information

Revenues and long-lived assets by geographic region for the years ended and as of December 31, 2014, 2013
and 2012 were as follows:

U.S. and Puerto Rico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Australia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brazil
U.K.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other(3)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2014

$4,473.0
375.1
276.2
275.1
248.7
232.0
221.6
204.7
204.4
196.3
161.0
114.2
98.0
1,183.2

Revenues(1)
2013

$3,194.5
387.4
268.8
202.8
104.9
91.0
200.9
86.9
130.9
178.2
155.6
47.0
37.2
683.5

2012

$1,885.8
349.1
199.3
71.2
12.2
0.6
167.4
2.5
1.9
184.1
135.1
19.2
2.3
449.7

Long-Lived Assets(2)
2013

2014

2012

$ 718.2
83.7
99.4
4.6
1.2
39.6
73.8
36.0
73.5
4.4
31.4
11.0
23.1
110.6

$ 592.0
87.7
110.0
7.0
1.3
44.3
82.5
40.5
83.8
3.4
41.4
12.2
25.3
102.8

$ 60.4
109.7
110.9
0.2

—
—
73.9
—
—

4.4
46.0
—
—
57.2

$8,263.5

$5,769.6

$3,480.4

$1,310.5

$1,234.2

$462.7

(1) Revenues are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer.

(2) Long-lived  assets  consist  of  property,  plant  and  equipment,  net  of  accumulated  depreciation,  which  is  attributed  to  countries

based  on the physical location of the assets.

(3) Other consists primarily of countries in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.

Major Customers

External customers that accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were  as follows:

McKesson Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AmerisourceBergen Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cardinal Health, Inc.

17% 19% 20%
10% 7% 8%
9% 13% 20%

2014

2013

2012

23. PS FUND 1 INVESTMENT

In connection with the merger proposal (which has since been withdrawn as described below) to the Board
of  Directors  of  Allergan  Inc.  (‘‘Allergan’’),  the  Company  and  Pershing  Square  Capital  Management,  L.P.
(‘‘Pershing  Square’’)  entered  into  an  agreement  pursuant  to  which,  among  other  things,  Valeant  and
Pershing  Square  became  members  of  a  newly  formed  jointly  owned  entity,  PS  Fund  1.  In  April  2014,  the
Company  contributed  $75.9  million  to  PS  Fund  1,  which  was  used  by  PS  Fund  1,  together  with  funds
contributed  by  funds  managed  by  Pershing  Square,  to  purchase  shares  of  Allergan  common  stock  and

F-93

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

23. PS FUND 1 INVESTMENT (Continued)

derivative  instruments  referencing  Allergan  common  stock.  The  investment  in  Allergan  shares  was
considered an available-for-sale security. 597,431 of the 28,878,538 shares of Allergan common stock held
for  PS  Fund  1  were  allocable  to  the  Company.  Based  on  the  Company’s  degree  of  influence  over  such
entity, the Company’s investment in PS Fund 1 was accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
Accordingly, the Company recognized its share of any unrealized gains or losses on the Allergan shares held
by PS Fund 1 as part of other comprehensive  (loss)  income.

On November 19, 2014, the Company withdrew its exchange offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of
Allergan.  Consequently,  the  Company  and  Pershing  Square  amended  their  previous  agreement,  and,  as  a
result, the Company is no longer a member of PS Fund 1. PS Fund 1 sold the shares of Allergan common
stock and distributed to the Company proceeds of $473.4 million, in the aggregate, in the fourth quarter of
2014 which included (i) proceeds of $127.2 million from the 597,431 shares allocable to the Company plus
(ii)  proceeds  of  $346.2  million  representing  the  Company’s  right  to  15%  of  the  net  profits  on  the  sale  of
shares  realized  by  Pershing  Square.  In  connection  with  the  sale,  the  Company  recognized  a  net  gain  of
$286.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 (which included the recognition of previously unrealized gains
that had been recorded as part of other comprehensive  (loss)  income).

Also, in connection with the withdrawal of the exchange offer, the commitment letter which the Company
had  received  for  the  purpose  of  financing  the  cash  component  of  the  consideration  to  be  paid  in  the
exchange offer, was terminated. As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company expensed and paid
$53.7 million of fees associated with  the  commitment letter.

The net gain of $286.7 million was recognized in Gain on investments, net in the consolidated statements of
income  (loss)  and  is  net  of  expenses  of  approximately  $110  million,  in  the  aggregate,  which  includes  the
$53.7 million of commitment letter fees described in the preceding paragraph as well as legal, consulting,
and other related expenses.

In the consolidated statement of cash flows, $75.9 million of the total proceeds was included as an investing
activity as it represents a return of the Company’s initial investment. The remaining portion of the proceeds
of $397.5 million, representing the Company’s return on investment, was classified as an operating activity,
as  were  the  payments  related  to  the  commitment  letter  fees  and  legal,  consulting,  and  other  related
expenses.

24. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Salix  Merger Agreement

On February 20, 2015, the Company, Valeant, Sun Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Valeant
(‘‘Sun  Merger  Sub’’),  and  Salix  Pharmaceuticals,  Ltd.  (‘‘Salix’’),  entered  into  an  Agreement  and  Plan  of
Merger  (the  ‘‘Salix  Merger  Agreement’’).  Salix  is  a  gastrointestinal  company  with  a  portfolio  of  22  total
products,  including  Xifaxan,  Uceris,  Relistor,  and  Apriso.  Pursuant  to  the  Salix  Merger  Agreement,  and
upon  the  terms  and  subject  to  the  conditions  described  thereof,  Valeant  has  agreed  to  cause  Sun  Merger
Sub  to  commence  a  tender  offer  (the  ‘‘Offer’’)  for  all  of  Salix’s  outstanding  shares  of  common  stock,  par
value  $0.001  per  share  (the  ‘‘Salix  Shares’’),  at  a  purchase  price  of  $158.00  per  Salix  Share  (the  ‘‘Offer
Price’’), payable net to the holder in cash, without interest, subject to any withholding of taxes. As soon as
practicable  following  the  consummation  of  the  Offer,  if  consummated,  and  subject  to  the  satisfaction  or
waiver of certain conditions set forth in the Salix Merger Agreement, Sun Merger Sub will merge with and
into Salix (the ‘‘Salix Merger’’), with no stockholder vote required to consummate the Salix Merger. Salix
will survive as a wholly owned subsidiary of Valeant, whereby any Salix Shares not purchased pursuant to
the Offer (other than certain Salix Shares as set forth in the Salix Merger Agreement) will be converted into

F-94

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

24. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued)

the right to receive cash in an amount equal to the Offer Price, payable net to the holder in cash, without
interest,  subject  to  any  withholding  of  taxes.  The  transaction  is  subject  to  customary  closing  conditions,
including the tender of a majority of the outstanding Salix Shares on a fully-diluted basis and the expiration
or  termination  of  the  applicable  waiting  period  under  the  United  States  Hart-Scott-Rodino  Antitrust
Improvements  Act  of  1976,  as  amended.  The  Company  currently  expects  the  transaction  to  close  in  the
second  quarter of 2015. The total enterprise value  of the transaction  is approximately $14.5 billion.

Commitment Letter

The Company and Valeant have entered into a commitment letter (the ‘‘Commitment Letter’’), dated as of
February  20,  2015,  with  a  syndicate  of  banks,  led  by  Deutsche  Bank  and  HSBC.  Pursuant  to  the
Commitment  Letter,  such  banks  have  committed  to  provide  (a)  in  the  event  certain  amendments  to  the
Credit Agreement are obtained within 30 days of the date of the Commitment Letter, (i) incremental term
loans  pursuant  to  the  Credit  Agreement  of  up  to  $5.55  billion,  and  (ii)  senior  unsecured  increasing  rate
bridge  loans  under  a  new  senior  unsecured  bridge  facility  of  up  to  $9.6  billion,  and  (b)  in  the  event  such
amendments are not obtained within 30 days of the date of the Commitment Letter, Valeant will refinance
its  existing  facilities  under  its  Credit  Agreement  and  obtain  (i)  up  to  $11.2  billion  in  term  loans,  (ii)  a
revolving credit facility of up to $500 million, (iii) a new senior secured bridge facility of up to $1.05 billion,
and  (iv)  a  new  senior  unsecured  bridge  facility  of  up  to  $9.75  billion.  The  loans  provided  under  the
Commitment Letter will be used for the purposes of funding (i) the transactions contemplated by the Salix
Merger  Agreement,  (ii)  Salix’s  obligation  to  repay  all  outstanding  loans  and  termination  of  commitments
under its (and its subsidiaries) existing credit facilities, (iii) the redemption of Salix’s 6.00% Senior Notes
due 2021, (iv) the payment of cash consideration upon the conversion of Salix’s 1.50% Convertible Senior
Notes due 2019 and 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015, (v) certain transaction expenses, and (vi) to
the extent the Company does not obtain the amendments to the Credit Agreement referred to above, the
refinancing  of the Company’s existing facilities  under its Credit Agreement.

Redemption of the December 2018 Notes

On February 17, 2015, Valeant redeemed the remaining $499.6 million of the outstanding principal amount
of the December 2018 Notes for $524.0 million, including a call premium of $17.2 million, plus accrued and
unpaid  interest, and satisfied and discharged the December 2018 Notes indenture.

5.50% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2023

On January 30, 2015, the Company issued $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes in a
private  placement.  The  2023  Notes  mature  on  March  1,  2023  and  bear  interest  at  the  rate  of  5.50%  per
annum,  payable  semi-annually  in  arrears,  commencing  on  September  1,  2015.  In  connection  with  the
issuance of the 2023 Notes, the Company incurred approximately $8.5 million in underwriting fees, which
are recognized as debt issue discount and which resulted in net proceeds of $991.5 million. The 2023 Notes
are guaranteed by each of the Company’s subsidiaries that is a guarantor of the Company’s existing Senior
Secured Credit Facilities.

The net proceeds of the 2023 Notes offering were used to (i) redeem all of the remaining December 2018
Notes  on  February  17,  2015,  as  described  above,  (ii)  repay  amounts  drawn  under  the  Revolving  Credit
Facility, and (iii) for general corporate purposes.

The indenture governing the terms of the 2023 Notes provide that at any time prior to March 1, 2018, the
Company may redeem up to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes using the proceeds

F-95

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(All tabular dollar amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars,  except per share data)

24. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued)

of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 105.50% of the principal amount of the 2023 Notes, plus
accrued  and  unpaid  interest  to  the  date  of  redemption.  On  or  after  March  1,  2018,  the  Company  may
redeem all or a portion of the 2023 Notes at the redemption prices applicable to the 2023 Notes, as set forth
in the 2023 Notes indenture, plus accrued  and  unpaid interest to the  date of redemption.

If  the  Company  experiences  a  change  in  control,  the  Company  may  be  required  to  repurchase  the  2023
Notes,  as  applicable,  in  whole  or  in  part,  at  a  purchase  price  equal  to  101%  of  the  aggregate  principal
amount  of  the  2023  Notes  repurchased,  plus  accrued  and  unpaid  interest  to,  but  excluding  the  applicable
purchase date of the 2023 Notes.

The  2023  Notes  indenture  contains  covenants  that  limit  the  ability  of  the  Company  and  certain  of  its
subsidiaries to, among other things: incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, make certain investments
and  other  restricted  payments,  create  liens,  enter  into  transactions  with  affiliates,  engage  in  merger,
consolidations or amalgamations and  transfer and sell assets.

Joinder Agreements

On  January  22,  2015,  the  Company  and  certain  of  its  subsidiaries,  as  guarantors,  entered  into  joinder
agreements to allow for an increase in commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility to $1.5 billion and
the issuance of $250.0 million in incremental term loans under the Series A-3 Tranche A Term Loan Facility.
Proceeds  from  this  transaction  were  used  to  repay  a  portion  of  the  amounts  drawn  under  the  Revolving
Credit Facility outstanding. The Revolving Credit Facility and the Series A-3 Tranche A Term Loan Facility
terms remained unchanged.

Bristol-Myers Collaboration and Option  Agreements

On  October  1,  2012,  the  Company  entered  into  collaboration  and  option  agreements  with  Bristol-Myers
Squibb  Company  (‘‘Bristol-Myers’’)  whereby  Bristol-Myers  granted  the  Company  additional  rights  for
approximately two years in several European countries to promote, market and sell a variety of products,
including Monopril(cid:4), Cefzil(cid:4), Duracef(cid:4) and Megace(cid:4). Prior to these agreements, the Company was selling
many  of  these  products  in  other  territories.  As  consideration  for  the  rights  under  the  collaboration  and
option  agreements,  the  Company  made  payments  to  Bristol-Myers  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2012  totaling
$83.3 million. The collaboration agreement expired January 1, 2015, at which time the Company exercised
its  option to acquire all rights and associated intellectual property to the products.

F-96

Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiary Information

As of February 25, 2015

Company

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Doing Business As

Bausch & Lomb Argentina  S.R.L. . . . . . . . Argentina

Bausch  &  Lomb  Argentina  S.R.L.

Waicon Vision S.A.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Argentina

Waicon  Vision S.A.

Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty. Limited . . Australia

Bausch  & Lomb  (Australia) Pty. Limited

DermaTech Pty. Ltd.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Australia

DermaTech  Pty.  Ltd.

Ganehill North America Pty. Ltd.

. . . . . . . Australia

Ganehill  North  America  Pty. Ltd.

Ganehill Pty. Ltd.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Australia

Ganehill  Pty.  Ltd.

Hissyfit International Pty Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . Australia

Hissyfit  International  Pty  Ltd.

iNova Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty

Australia

Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

iNova  Pharmaceuticals (Australia)  Pty
Limited

iNova Sub Pty Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Australia

iNova Sub  Pty Limited

Private Formula International Holdings

Australia

Pty. Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Private  Formula International  Holdings
Pty. Ltd.

Private Formula International Pty. Ltd.

. . . Australia

Private  Formula  International Pty. Ltd.

Solta Medical Australia Propretary Ltd . . . . Australia

Solta Medical  Australia Propretary  Ltd

Valeant Holdco 2 Pty Ltd . . . . . . . . . . . . . Australia

Valeant Holdco 3 Pty Ltd . . . . . . . . . . . . . Australia

Valeant Pharmaceuticals Australasia

Australia

Pty. Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Valeant  Holdco  2 Pty  Ltd

Valeant  Holdco  3 Pty  Ltd

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals Australasia
Pty. Ltd.

Wirra Holdings Pty Limited . . . . . . . . . . . Australia

Wirra Holdings Pty  Limited

Wirra IP Pty Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Australia

Wirra IP Pty  Limited

Wirra Operations Pty Limited . . . . . . . . . . Australia

Wirra Operations  Pty  Limited

Bausch & Lomb GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Austria

Bausch &  Lomb GmbH

Hythe Property Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . Barbados

Hythe  Property  Incorporated

Natur Produkt-M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Belarus

Natur Produkt-M

Bausch & Lomb B.V.B.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Belgium

Bausch  &  Lomb  B.V.B.A.

Bausch  & Lomb  Pharma S.A. . . . . . . . . . . Belgium

Bausch  &  Lomb  Pharma  S.A.

Croma Pharma BVBA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Belgium

Croma  Pharma BVBA

Valeant International Bermuda . . . . . . . . . Bermuda

Valeant International  Bermuda

Valeant Pharmaceuticals Nominee Bermuda

Bermuda

Valeant Pharmaceuticals Nominee  Bermuda

PharmaSwiss BH drustvo  za trgovinu na

Bosnia

veliko d.o.o.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PharmaSwiss BH  drustvo za  trgovinu  na
veliko  d.o.o.

BL Importa¸c˜oes Ltda.
BL Ind´ustria  ´Otica Ltda.
Instituto Terapˆeutico Delta Ltda. . . . . . . . . Brazil

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brazil

. . . . . . . . . . . . . Brazil

Probi´otica Laborat´orios Ltda.

. . . . . . . . . . Brazil

BL Importa¸c˜oes  Ltda.
BL Ind´ustria  ´Otica  Ltda.
Instituto  Terapˆeutico Delta Ltda.

Probi´otica  Laborat´orios Ltda.

Valeant Farmacˆeutica do Brasil Ltda. . . . . . Brazil

Valeant  Farmacˆeutica do Brasil  Ltda.

0938638 BC Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . British Columbia (Canada)

0938638  BC  Ltd.

0938893 BC Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . British Columbia (Canada)

0938893  BC  Ltd.

Croma Pharma Canada Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . British Columbia (Canada) Croma  Pharma Canada  Ltd.

Bauch & Lomb-Lord (BVI) Incorporated . . British  Virgin Islands

Bauch  &  Lomb-Lord  (BVI) Incorporated

Company

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Doing Business As

PharmaSwiss EOOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bulgaria

9079-8851 Quebec, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada

PharmaSwiss  EOOD

9079-8851 Quebec,  Inc.

Bausch & Lomb Canada Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . Canada

Bausch  &  Lomb  Canada  Inc.

Medicis Aesthetics Canada Ltd. . . . . . . . . . Canada

Medicis Aesthetics  Canada  Ltd.

Medicis Canada Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada

Medicis Canada Ltd.

Valeant Canada GP Limited . . . . . . . . . . . Canada

Valeant Canada  GP  Limited

Valeant Canada S.E.C./Valeant Canada LP . Canada

Valeant Canada S.E.C./Valeant  Canada LP

Valeant Canada Ltd.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada

Valeant Canada  Ltd.

Valeant Groupe Cosmoderme Inc. . . . . . . . Canada

Valeant Groupe Cosmoderme Inc.

V-BAC Holding Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada

V-BAC Holding Corp.

Bausch & Lomb (Shanghai)

Trading Co., Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Beijing Bausch & Lomb Eyecare

Company, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

China

China

Shandong Bausch & Lomb Freda New

China

Packaging Materials Co Ltd . . . . . . . . . .

Shandong Bausch & Lomb Freda

China

Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

. . . . . . . . . . . .

PharmaSwiss drustvo s ogranicenom

Croatia

odgovornoscu za  trgovinu I usluge . . . . .

Bausch &  Lomb  (Shanghai)
Trading  Co., Ltd.

Beijing  Bausch  & Lomb  Eyecare
Company, Ltd.

Shandong  Bausch  &  Lomb  Freda  New
Packaging Materials Co Ltd

Shandong  Bausch  &  Lomb  Freda
Pharmaceutical  Co.  Ltd.

PharmaSwiss drustvo  s ogranicenom
odgovornoscu za  trgovinu I usluge

PharmaSwiss Ceska republika s.r.o.

. . . . . . Czech  Republic

PharmaSwiss  Ceska republika s.r.o.

Valeant Czech Pharma s.r.o. . . . . . . . . . . . Czech  Republic

Valeant Czech Pharma  s.r.o.

PharmaSwiss Eesti OU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Estonia

PharmaSwiss  Eesti  OU

Bausch & Lomb France S.A.S.

. . . . . . . . .

France

Bausch &  Lomb France  SAS

BCF S.A.S.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

France

BCF  SAS

Chauvin Opsia S.A.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

France

Chauvin Opsia  S.A.S.

Croma SAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

France

Croma  SAS

Laboratoire Chauvin S.A.S.

. . . . . . . . . . .

France

Laboratoire Chauvin  SAS

Pharma Pass S.A.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

France

Bausch & Lomb GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany

BLEP Europe GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany

BLEP  Holding GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Germany

Pharma  Pass  SAS

Bausch & Lomb GmbH

BLEP  Europe  GmbH

BLEP  Holding GmbH

Chauvin ankerpharm GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . Germany

Chauvin  ankerpharm GmbH

Croma-Pharma Deutschland G.m.b.H.

. . . . Germany

Croma-Pharma Deutschland  G.m.b.H.

Dr. Gerhard Mann chem.-pharm.

Germany

Fabrik GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Dr.  Gerhard  Mann chem.-pharm.
Fabrik GmbH

Dr. Robert Winzer Pharma GmbH . . . . . . Germany

Dr. Robert Winzer Pharma GmbH

Grundstuckgesellschaft Dr. Gerhard

Germany

Mann GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Grundstuckgesellschaft  Dr.  Gerhard
Mann GmbH

Pharmaplast Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH . . . Germany

Pharmaplast  Vertriebsgesellschaft  mbH

Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH . . . . . . . . Germany

Technolas  Perfect  Vision GmbH

PharmaSwiss Hellas S.A.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . Greece

PharmaSwiss Hellas  S.A.

Bausch & Lomb (Hong Kong)  Limited . . . Hong Kong

Bausch  &  Lomb  (Hong Kong)  Limited

iNova Pharmaceuticals (Hong Kong)

Hong Kong

Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

iNova Pharmaceuticals  (Hong Kong)
Limited

Sino Concept Technology Limited . . . . . . . Hong  Kong

Sino Concept  Technology Limited

Company

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Doing Business As

Solta Medical International, Ltd . . . . . . . . Hong Kong

Solta Medical  International,  Ltd

Technolas Hong Kong Limited . . . . . . . . . Hong Kong

Technolas Hong  Kong  Limited

Valeant Pharma Hungary Commercial LLC . Hungary

Valeant  Pharma  Hungary  Commercial LLC

Bausch & Lomb Eyecare (India) Private

India

Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Bausch  & Lomb  Eyecare  (India) Private
Limited

PT Armoxindo Farma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Indonesia

PT Armoxindo  Farma

PT Bausch Lomb  Indonesia . . . . . . . . . . .

Indonesia

PT Bausch Lomb  Indonesia

PT Bausch & Lomb (Distributing) . . . . . . .

Indonesia

PT Bausch &  Lomb (Distributing)

PT Bausch & Lomb Manufacturing . . . . . .

Indonesia

PT Bausch &  Lomb Manufacturing

C&C Vision International Limited . . . . . . .

Ireland

C&C Vision  International  Limited

Valeant Holdings Ireland . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Ireland

Valeant Holdings  Ireland

Valeant Pharmaceuticals Ireland . . . . . . . .

Ireland

Valeant Pharmaceuticals  Ireland

PharmaSwiss Israel Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Israel

Bausch & Lomb IOM S.p.A.

. . . . . . . . . .

Eyeonics Europe SRL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Italy

Italy

B.L.J. Company, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Japan

PharmaSwiss  Israel  Ltd.

Bausch  &  Lomb  IOM S.p.A.

Eyeonics  Europe  SRL

B.L.J.  Company,  Ltd.

Bausch & Lomb (Jersey) Limited . . . . . . .

Jersey

Bausch  &  Lomb  (Jersey) Limited

TOO ‘‘NP Market Asia’’

. . . . . . . . . . . . . Kazakhstan

TOO  ‘‘NP Market Asia’’

Bausch & Lomb Korea Co. Ltd.

. . . . . . . . Korea

Bausch &  Lomb  Korea  Co.  Ltd.

Bescon Co. Ltd.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Korea

Bescon  Co.  Ltd.

Bescon Korea Distribution  Inc. . . . . . . . . . Korea

Bescon  Korea Distribution  Inc.

PharmaSwiss SA Sh.k.p. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kosovo

PharmaSwiss SA  Sh.k.p.

PharmaSwiss Latvia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Latvia

UAB PharmaSwiss

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Lithuania

PharmaSwiss Latvia

UAB PharmaSwiss

Bausch & Lomb Luxembourg s.a.r.l.

. . . . .

Luxembourg

Bausch &  Lomb  Luxembourg  s.a.r.l.

Bausch & Lomb Luxembourg s.a.r.l.  & Cie .

Luxembourg

Bausch & Lomb Luxembourg  s.a.r.l.  & Cie

Biovail International  S.a.r.l.

. . . . . . . . . . .

Luxembourg

Biovail International S.a.r.l.

Valeant Holdings Luxembourg S.a r.l. . . . . .

Luxembourg

Valeant Holdings  Luxembourg S.a r.l.

Valeant International Luxembourg S.a r.l. . .

Luxembourg

Valeant  International Luxembourg  S.a  r.l.

Valeant Pharmaceuticals
Luxembourg S.a r.l.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Luxembourg

Valeant Pharmaceuticals
Luxembourg  S.a r.l.

PharmaSwiss dooel Skopje . . . . . . . . . . . . Macedonia

PharmaSwiss dooel Skopje

Bausch & Lomb (Malaysia) Sdn  Bhd . . . . . Malaysia

Bausch &  Lomb  (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd

Aton Malta Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Malta

Aton  Malta  Limited

Bausch & Lomb Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

. . . . Mexico

Bausch &  Lomb  Mexico,  S.A.  de  C.V.

Laboratorios Grossman, S.A.

. . . . . . . . . . Mexico

Logistica Valeant, S.A. de C.V.

. . . . . . . . . Mexico

Nysco de Mexico S.A. de C.V. . . . . . . . . . . Mexico

Laboratorios  Grossman,  S.A.

Logistica  Valeant, S.A. de C.V.

Nysco  de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

Tecnofarma, S.A. de C.V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mexico

Tecnofarma, S.A. de C.V.

Valeant Farmaceutica S.A. de CV.

. . . . . . . Mexico

Valeant  Farmaceutica S.A. de CV.

Valeant Servicios y Administracion, S.  de

Mexico

R.L. de C.V.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Valeant  Servicios y  Administracion, S. de
R.L. de C.V.

Bausch & Lomb B.V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands

Bausch & Lomb B.V.

Bausch+Lomb OPS B.V.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands

Bausch+Lomb  OPS  B.V.

Croma-Pharma Nederland BV . . . . . . . . . Netherlands

Croma-Pharma Nederland BV

Company

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Doing Business As

Natur Produkt Europe BV . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands

Natur  Produkt Europe  BV

Solta Medical International, B.V. . . . . . . . . Netherlands

Solta Medical  International,  B.V.

Technolas Perfect Vision Cooperatief U.A.

. Netherlands

Technolas Perfect  Vision  Cooperatief U.A.

Valeant Dutch Holdings B.V.

. . . . . . . . . . Netherlands

Valeant Dutch  Holdings B.V.

Valeant Europe BV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Netherlands

Valeant Europe  BV

Bausch & Lomb (New Zealand) Limited . . New  Zealand

Bausch  &  Lomb  (New  Zealand) Limited

iNova Pharmaceuticals (New Zealand)

New Zealand

Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Valeant Pharmaceuticals New Zealand

New  Zealand

Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

iNova  Pharmaceuticals (New  Zealand)
Limited

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  New  Zealand
Limited

Valeant Farmaceutica Panama  S.A.

. . . . . .

Panama

Valeant  Farmaceutica Panama  S.A.

Valeant Peru . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Peru

Valeant Peru

Bausch & Lomb (Philippines), Inc.

. . . . . .

Philippines

Bausch &  Lomb  (Philippines), Inc.

Bausch & Lomb Polska Sp. z.o.o.

. . . . . . .

Poland

Bausch & Lomb Polska Sp. z.o.o.

Cadogan sp´ołka z ograniczon˛a

odpowiedzialno´sci˛a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Cochrane sp´ołka z ograniczon˛a

odpowiedzialno´sci˛a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Poland

Poland

Croma Inter Sp.z.o.o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Poland

Croma Polska Sp. z o.o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Poland

Croma-Pharma Polska Sp. z o.o.

. . . . . . . .

Poland

Emo-Farm sp´ołka z ograniczon˛a

Poland

odpowiedzialno´sci˛a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Cadogan sp´ołka z ograniczon˛a
odpowiedzialno´sci˛a

Cochrane  sp´ołka z ograniczon˛a
odpowiedzialno´sci˛a

Croma  Inter  Sp.z.o.o.

Croma  Polska  Sp.  z o.o.

Croma-Pharma  Polska  Sp.  z o.o.

Emo-Farm  sp´ołka z ograniczon˛a
odpowiedzialno´sci˛a

ICN Polfa Rzeszow  SA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Poland

ICN Polfa  Rzeszow SA

IPOPEMA 73 Fundusz inwestycyjny

Poland

Zamkniety Aktywow Niepublicznych
(FIZAN) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Laboratorium Farmaceutyczne Homeofarm

Poland

Sp. Z.o.o.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

IPOPEMA  73  Fundusz  inwestycyjny
Zamkniety  Aktywow Niepublicznych
(FIZAN)

Laboratorium Farmaceutyczne  Homeofarm
Sp. Z.o.o.

PharmaSwiss Poland Sp. z.o.o.

. . . . . . . . .

Poland

PharmaSwiss Poland Sp.  z.o.o.

Przedsiebiorstwo Farmaceutyczne Jelfa SA .

Poland

Przedsiebiorstwo  Farmaceutyczne  Jelfa  SA

Valeant sp. z.o.o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Poland

Valeant  sp. z.o.o.

Valeant sp´ołka z ograniczon˛a

Poland

odpowiedzialno´sci˛a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

VP Valeant Sp. z o.o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Poland

S.C. Croma Romania Srl

. . . . . . . . . . . . . Romania

Valeant  sp´ołka z ograniczon˛a
odpowiedzialno´sci˛a

VP Valeant  Sp. z  o.o.

S.C.  Croma  Romania Srl

S.C. PharmaSwiss Medicines S.R.L. . . . . . . Romania

S.C.  PharmaSwiss  Medicines S.R.L.

JSC ‘‘Natur Produkt International’’

. . . . . . Russia

JSC  ‘‘Natur Produkt  International’’

Limited Liability Company ‘‘Bausch  &

Russia

Lomb’’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OOO ‘‘NP-Logistika’’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russia

OOO ‘‘NP-Nedvizhimost’’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russia

Limited  Liability  Company ‘‘Bausch  &
Lomb’’

OOO ‘‘NP-Logistika’’

OOO ‘‘NP-Nedvizhimost’’

Valeant LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russia

Valeant  LLC

PharmaSwiss d.o.o. Serbia . . . . . . . . . . . .

Serbia

PharmaSwiss d.o.o. Serbia

Bausch & Lomb (Singapore) Private

Singapore

Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Bausch  &  Lomb  (Singapore)  Private
Limited

Company

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Doing Business As

iNova Pharmaceuticals (Singapore) Pte

Singapore

Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

iNova  Pharmaceuticals  (Singapore)  Pte
Limited

Solta Medical Singapore Private Limited . .

Singapore

Solta Medical  Singapore Private  Limited

Technolas Singapore Pte. Ltd. . . . . . . . . . .

Singapore

Technolas Singapore  Pte.  Ltd.

Wirra International Bidco Pte Limited . . . .

Singapore

Wirra International  Bidco  Pte  Limited

Wirra International Holdings Pte Limited . .

Singapore

Wirra  International Holdings  Pte  Limited

Sanitas Pharma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Slovakia

Valeant Slovakia s.r.o.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Slovakia

Sanitas  Pharma

Valeant Slovakia  s.r.o.

PharmaSwiss d.o.o., Ljubljana . . . . . . . . . .

Slovenia

PharmaSwiss  d.o.o.,  Ljubljana

Bausch & Lomb (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd . .

South Africa

Bausch &  Lomb  (South Africa)  (Pty)  Ltd

iNova Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Limited . . . . .

South  Africa

iNova Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Limited

Soflens (Pty) Ltd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

South  Africa

Soflens  (Pty) Ltd

Bausch & Lomb S.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Spain

Croma Pharma SL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Spain

Bausch & Lomb Nordic AB . . . . . . . . . . .

Sweden

Croma-Pharma Nordic AB . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sweden

Bausch  &  Lomb  S.A.

Croma  Pharma SL

Bausch  &  Lomb  Nordic  AB

Croma-Pharma Nordic AB

Valeant Sweden AB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sweden

Valeant Sweden  AB

Bausch & Lomb Fribourg  s.a.r.l.

. . . . . . . .

Switzerland

Bausch &  Lomb  Fribourg  s.a.r.l.

Bausch & Lomb Swiss AG . . . . . . . . . . . .

Switzerland

Bausch &  Lomb  Swiss  AG

Biovail S.A.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Switzerland

Biovail S.A.

fx Life Sciences AG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Switzerland

PharmaSwiss SA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Switzerland

fx  Life Sciences  AG

PharmaSwiss SA

Bausch & Lomb Taiwan Limited . . . . . . . .

Taiwan

Bausch  &  Lomb  Taiwan  Limited

Bausch & Lomb (Thailand) Limited . . . . .

Thailand

Bausch &  Lomb  (Thailand)  Limited

iNova Pharmaceuticals (Thailand) Ltd . . . .

Thailand

iNova  Pharmaceuticals (Thailand)  Ltd

Bausch & Lomb Saglik ve Optic Urunleri

Turkey

Tic. A.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Bausch  &  Lomb  Saglik  ve Optic  Urunleri
Tic.  A.S.

Valeant Pharmaceuticals LLC . . . . . . . . . . Ukraine

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  LLC

Medpharma Pharmaceutical & Chemical

UAE

Industries LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Medpharma  Pharmaceutical  & Chemical
Industries LLC

Bausch & Lomb  Scotland Limited . . . . . . . United  Kingdom

Bausch &  Lomb  Scotland  Limited

Bausch & Lomb UK Holdings Limited . . . . United  Kingdom

Bausch &  Lomb  UK Holdings  Limited

Bausch & Lomb U.K. Limited . . . . . . . . . United  Kingdom

Bausch &  Lomb  U.K. Limited

Chauvin Pharmaceuticals Limited . . . . . . . United  Kingdom

Chauvin  Pharmaceuticals  Limited

Solta Medical UK Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . United  Kingdom

Solta Medical  UK Limited

Dr. LeWinn’s Private Formula

California  (US)

International, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Dr.  LeWinn’s Private  Formula
International, Inc.

Iolab Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . California  (US)

Iolab Corporation

OnPharma Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . California  (US)

OnPharma  Inc.

Private Formula Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . California  (US)

Private  Formula  Corp.

Aesthera Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Aesthera Corporation

Aton Pharma, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Aton  Pharma, Inc.

Audrey Enterprise, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Audrey  Enterprise, LLC

B&L Financial Holdings Corp.

. . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

B&L Financial  Holdings Corp.

Bausch & Lomb China, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Bausch &  Lomb  China,  Inc.

Company

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Doing Business As

Bausch & Lomb Holdings Incorporated . . . Delaware  (US)

Bausch & Lomb Holdings  Incorporated

Bausch & Lomb Pharma Holdings Corp.

. . Delaware  (US)

Bausch  &  Lomb  Pharma  Holdings Corp.

Bausch & Lomb South Asia, Inc.

. . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Bausch  &  Lomb  South  Asia, Inc.

Bausch & Lomb Technology Corporation . . Delaware (US)

Bausch  &  Lomb  Technology  Corporation

Biovail Americas Corp.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Biovail Americas  Corp.

Biovail NTI Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Biovail NTI Inc.

COLD-FX Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.

. . . Delaware (US)

COLD-FX  Pharmaceuticals  (USA)  Inc.

Coria Laboratories, Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Coria Laboratories,  Ltd.

Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc.

. . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Dow Pharmaceutical  Sciences, Inc.

Drone Acquisition Sub Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Drone Acquisition  Sub  Inc.

ECR Pharmaceuticals Co., Inc. . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

ECR Pharmaceuticals Co.,  Inc.

Emma Z LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Erin S LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

eyeonics, inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Eyetech Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Emma Z LP

Erin S  LP

eyeonics, inc.

Eyetech  Inc.

ICN Southeast, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

ICN  Southeast,  Inc.

ISTA Pharmaceuticals, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

ISTA Pharmaceuticals,  LLC

Katie Z LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Katie Z  LP

KGA Fulfillment Services,  Inc.

. . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

KGA Fulfillment Services,  Inc.

Kika LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Kika LP

Liposonix, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Liposonix,  Inc.

Medicis Body Aesthetics, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Medicis Body  Aesthetics, Inc.

Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Medicis Pharmaceutical  Corporation

Nicox, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Nicox,  Inc.

Obagi Medical Products, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Obagi  Medical  Products,  Inc.

Oceanside Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

. . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Oceanside Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.

OMP, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

OMP, Inc.

Onset Dermatologics LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Onset  Dermatologics LLC

OPO, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

OPO,  Inc.

OraPharma TopCo Holdings, Inc.

. . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

OraPharma  TopCo Holdings,  Inc.

OraPharma, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

OrphaMed Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

OraPharma,  Inc.

OrphaMed Inc.

PreCision Dermatology, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

PreCision  Dermatology,  Inc.

PreCision MD LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

PreCision  MD LLC

Prestwick Pharmaceuticals, Inc. . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Prestwick  Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Princeton Pharma Holdings, LLC . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Princeton  Pharma Holdings,  LLC

ProSkin LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

ProSkin LLC

Reliant Technologies LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Reliant Technologies LLC

RHC Holdings, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

RHC  Holdings,  Inc.

RTI Acquisition Corporation, Inc.

. . . . . . . Delaware (US)

RTI Acquisition  Corporation,  Inc.

Sight Savers, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Solta Medical, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Sight  Savers,  Inc.

Solta Medical,  Inc.

Stephanie LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Stephanie  LP

Technolas Perfect Vision, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . Delaware (US)

Technolas  Perfect  Vision,  Inc.

Company

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Doing Business As

Tinea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Tinea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Tori LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Tori  LP

TP Cream Sub, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

TP Lotion Sub, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

TP  Cream Sub,  LLC

TP  Lotion Sub, LLC

Valeant Biomedicals, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

Valeant  Biomedicals,  Inc.

Valeant Pharmaceuticals International

. . . . Delaware  (US)

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International

Valeant Pharmaceuticals North

Delaware  (US)

America LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  North
America LLC

VRX Holdco Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

VRX Holdco2 Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware  (US)

VRX Holdco  Inc.

VRX Holdco2  Inc.

Croma Pharmaceuticals Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . .

Florida (US)

Croma  Pharmaceuticals  Inc.

Ucyclyd Pharma, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maryland (US)

Ucyclyd Pharma, Inc.

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . New  York (US)

Bausch &  Lomb  Incorporated

Bausch & Lomb International Inc. . . . . . . . New  York (US)

Bausch &  Lomb  International  Inc.

Bausch & Lomb Realty  Corporation . . . . . New  York (US)

Bausch &  Lomb  Realty Corporation

Pedinol Pharmacal, Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . New  York (US)

Pedinol Pharmacal, Inc.

Renaud Skin Care Laboratories,  Inc.

. . . . . New  York (US)

Renaud Skin  Care  Laboratories,  Inc.

Image Acquisition Corp.

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

Texas  (US)

Image  Acquisition  Corp.

Euvipharm Pharmaceuticals Joint Stock

Vietnam

Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Euvipharm  Pharmaceuticals Joint  Stock
Company

In accordance with the instructions of Item 601 of Regulation S-K, certain subsidiaries are omitted from the

foregoing table.

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration  Statement  on  Forms  S-8
(Nos.  333-92229,  333-196120,  333-138697,  333-168629,  333-168254,  and  333-176205),  as  amended  (where
applicable), of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2015 relating to the
financial  statements,  financial  statement  schedule  and  the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting, which appears in this Form  10-K.

Exhibit 23.1

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Florham Park, NJ
February 25, 2015

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE  OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.1

I, J. Michael Pearson, certify that:

1.

I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  (the
‘‘Company’’);

2. Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue  statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with  respect to the period  covered  by  this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly  present  in  all  material  respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in  this  report;

4. The  Company’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and
have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is  being  prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the
reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report  based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that
occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  Company’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of
internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  to  the  Company’s  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  the
Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  ability  to  record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a

significant role in the Company’s internal control over  financial  reporting.

Date: February 25, 2015

/s/ J. MICHAEL PEARSON

J. Michael Pearson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive  Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

CERTIFICATION  OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.2

I, Howard B. Schiller, certify that:

1.

I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals  International,  Inc.  (the
‘‘Company’’);

2. Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue  statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with  respect to the period  covered  by  this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly  present  in  all  material  respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in  this  report;

4. The  Company’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and
have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is  being  prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the
reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report  based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that
occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  Company’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of
internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  to  the  Company’s  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  the
Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  ability  to  record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a

significant role in the Company’s internal control over  financial  reporting.

Date: February 25, 2015

/s/ HOWARD B. SCHILLER

Howard B. Schiller
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE  OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.1

I,  J.  Michael  Pearson,  Chairman  of  the  Board  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals
International, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The  Annual  Report  of  the  Company  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2014  (the
‘‘Annual Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained  in  the  Annual  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial

condition and results of operations of  the Company.

Date: February 25, 2015

/s/ J. MICHAEL PEARSON

J. Michael Pearson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive  Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’). Such certification will not be deemed to
be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company  specifically  incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

CERTIFICATION  OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.2

I,  Howard  B.  Schiller,  Executive  Vice-President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Valeant  Pharmaceuticals
International, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The  Annual  Report  of  the  Company  on  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2014  (the
‘‘Annual Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained  in  the  Annual  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial

condition and results of operations of  the Company.

Date: February 25, 2015

/s/ HOWARD B. SCHILLER

Howard B. Schiller
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’). Such certification will not be deemed to
be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company  specifically  incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will  be  retained  by  the  Company  and  furnished  to  the  U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff
upon request.

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

CORPORATE INFORMATION
2150 St. Elzéar Blvd. 
Laval, Quebec H7L 4A8 
Canada 
Phone: 

(800) 361-1448
(514) 744-6792 
(514) 744-6272

Fax: 

INVESTOR AND MEDIA RELATIONS
You may request a copy of documents at no 
cost by contacting:
Laurie W. Little
Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
(949) 461-6002
ir@valeant.com
Email updates are also available through the 
Investor Relations page at Valeant’s website at 
www.valeant.com.

PRINCIPAL TRANSFER AGENT & REGISTRAR
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.’s designated  transfer agent 
is CST Trust Company. The transfer agent is responsible for maintaining 
all records of registered stockholders (including change of address, 
telephone number, and name), canceling or issuing stock certificates and 
resolving problems related to lost, destroyed or stolen certificates. If you 
are a registered stockholder of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, 
Inc. and need to change your records pertaining to stock, please contact 
the Transfer Agent listed below: 

CST Trust Company
P.O. Box 700
Station B
Montreal, QC H3B 3K3
Canada
Email: inquiries@canstockta.com
Fax: 888-249-6189
Phone (for all security transfer inquiries):
1-800-387-0825 or 416-682-3860
Website: www.canstockta.com

 
 
 
 
valeant pharmaceuticals international, inc. 
2150 St. Elzéar Blvd. Laval, Quebec H7L 4A8 Canada 
Phone / +1 514 744 6792 Fax / +1 514 744 6272