Baxter International Annual Report 2006

← All annual reports

FY2006 Annual Report · Baxter International

Loading PDF…

7 5 Y E A R S o f

I N N OVAT I O N

BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC. 2006 ANNUAL REPORT

A H I S T O R Y o f F I R S T S

First commercially
manufactured
intravenous (IV)
solutions
1931

First container to
provide means
to separate plasma
from whole blood and
store it for later use
1941

First flexible,
plastic blood-
collection
container
1959

First flexible,
plastic IV
container
1971

1900

1939
First sterile, vacuum-
type blood collection
and storage unit

1956
First commercially
built artificial
kidney

1968
First commercially
produced factor
VIII concentrate to
treat hemophilia

1978
First ambulatory
dialysis system

First heat-treated
factor VIII concen-
trate, reducing
risk of viral
transmission
1982

First genetically
manufactured,
or recombinant,
factor VIII
concentrate
1992

First “triple
chamber bag”
for parenteral
nutrition
1998

2000

1991
First “needle-less”
system for IV therapy

First albumin in
a flexible,
plastic container
2005

2003
First recombinant
factor VIII made
without any added
human or animal
proteins

1988
First factor VIII
concentrate purified
by chemical and
monoclonal
techniques

A H I S T O R Y o f F I R S T S

First commercially
manufactured
intravenous (IV)
solutions
1931

First container to
provide means
to separate plasma
from whole blood and
store it for later use
1941

First flexible,
plastic blood-
collection
container
1959

First flexible,
plastic IV
container
1971

1900

1939
First sterile, vacuum-
type blood collection
and storage unit

1956
First commercially
built artificial
kidney

1968
First commercially
produced factor
VIII concentrate to
treat hemophilia

1978
First ambulatory
dialysis system

First heat-treated
factor VIII concen-
trate, reducing
risk of viral
transmission
1982

First genetically
manufactured,
or recombinant,
factor VIII
concentrate
1992

First “triple
chamber bag”
for parenteral
nutrition
1998

2000

1991
First “needle-less”
system for IV therapy

First albumin in
a flexible,
plastic container
2005

2003
First recombinant
factor VIII made
without any added
human or animal
proteins

1988
First factor VIII
concentrate purified
by chemical and
monoclonal
techniques

About the cover: Eight-year-old Matt Olovich of Fishers, Indiana, has hemophilia A. He uses

Baxter’s ADVATE clotting factor for bleeding episodes that might otherwise keep him from playing

Little League baseball, allowing him to follow in the footsteps of his great-grandfather, who

played in the New York Yankees organization. As the only recombinant factor VIII concentrate for

hemophilia A that is processed without any blood additives, ADVATE eliminates the potential risk

of blood-borne pathogen transmission.

The impact of healthcare innovation is
measured in lives. A single life saved has
an impact on generations of lives that
follow. Baxter employees around the
world are connected by their enduring
commitment to save and sustain lives.
It is this higher purpose that binds us as
a company and as global citizens.

Baxter Annual Report 2006

Dear Shareholders: In 2006, Baxter celebrated its 75th anniversary.This report,
“75 Years of Innovation,” recalls the many ways Baxter has revolutionized health-
care, and describes what we are doing today to continue this legacy. Innovation is
at the core of what we do. It remains the driving force behind our future success.

ENTERING A NEW PHASE
When you opened this report, you may have noticed a timeline of
our “history of firsts.” Baxter has been responsible for some extraor-
dinary medical breakthroughs, from the first commercially prepared
intravenous (IV) solutions, to the first dialysis treatments for people
with kidney disease, to the first concentrated clotting factor for
hemophilia. That’s the legacy of our company. We are committed to
renewing that culture of innovation and re-establishing Baxter as
a company known for its pioneering innovations in healthcare.

We are making great progress. Two years ago, we instituted a
series of objectives to lay the groundwork for our future success.
These included rebuilding our financial strength, re-establishing
credibility with investors, creating a new leadership team and
organizational structure, re-engineering key business processes,
and defining a vision for Baxter’s future. We have met each of
these objectives. We also have done an effective job of optimizing
our current products and businesses, expanding geographically
and improving the productivity of our research-and-development
(R&D) efforts to drive solid growth. Now, with a stronger financial
base, we are able to enter a second phase in our development,
one characterized by increased R&D investment and more aggres-
sive pursuit of business development opportunities to accelerate
growth in the years ahead. We will employ the same discipline
and rigor that we have applied over the last two years, steadfastly
committing ourselves to enhancing shareholder value through a
disciplined capital allocation framework.

REINVIGORATING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Reinvigorating science and technology is our most important strate-
gic priority. We increased our R&D spending 15 percent in 2006, to
over $600 million, the highest level in our 75-year history. We will
continue to grow R&D spending faster than sales. We also will begin
to invest more of our R&D dollars in exploratory R&D and early-
stage initiatives that may yield future medical breakthroughs.

Baxter’s ability to build on its history of innovation requires
not only economic investment, but continued leveraging of our core
technical competencies across our businesses. Today’s research
initiatives include adult stem-cell therapies, tissue-regeneration
technologies, new recombinant products, and vaccines for avian

flu and other diseases. Our expertise in medical devices, pharma-
ceuticals and biotechnology makes us unique in the healthcare
industry. We will continue to apply our capabilities in these areas
to bring new innovative therapies to patients worldwide.

2006: A SUCCESSFUL YEAR
Baxter had a successful year on many fronts in 2006. We met or
exceeded all of our key financial objectives. We introduced a
number of significant new products. We completed the rebuilding
of our senior management team. And we made meaningful
progress on numerous key R&D initiatives. In 2006, we:

bb Advanced programs to develop longer-acting forms of

ADVATE, our latest recombinant factor VIII concentrate for
hemophilia.

bb Initiated a program to develop a recombinant therapy

for von Willebrand disease.

bb Achieved promising preliminary results of a Phase I/II

clinical trial of our H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine that
suggest the vaccine is well tolerated in humans.

bb Initiated a Phase II clinical trial investigating the use of adult
stem cells to treat chronic myocardial ischemia, a severe
form of coronary artery disease. We also formed a new
business unit, Regenerative Medicine, by combining our
resources in cellular therapy and biosurgery.

bb Received regulatory approval for a new state-of-the-art
plasma fractionation facility in Los Angeles. We also are
supporting studies to identify other potential indications for
our plasma-based products, including use of intravenous
immunoglobulin (IVIG) as a possible treatment for
Alzheimer’s disease.

bb Announced plans to sell our Transfusion Therapies business
to Texas Pacific Group. The sale was completed in early 2007.

bb Announced plans to form a joint venture with Guangzhou
Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. to produce and sell
parenteral nutrition products in China.

bb Expanded our portfolio of inhaled anesthetics in key markets
around the world, becoming the first company to offer all
three modern inhaled anesthetics for general anesthesia.

bb Realized net patient gains of more than 8,400 peritoneal

dialysis (PD) patients worldwide, an increase of 7 percent,
supporting our strategy of geographic expansion as the
primary growth driver of our Renal business.

A RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE CITIZEN
Being a great company also means being a responsible corporate
citizen. At Baxter, we view sustainability as a long-term approach
to balancing our business priorities with social, economic and
environmental responsibilities. In 2006, Baxter was named the
Medical Products Industry Leader of the Dow Jones Sustainability
Index (DJSI), the world’s first benchmark tracking the sustainability
performance of top companies. The recognition marked the eighth
straight year Baxter has been listed in the DJSI since its launch in
1999. Baxter also received the 2006 Climate Protection award
from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

In early 2007, Baxter was named for the third straight year to
Innovest Strategic Value Advisors’ “Global 100 Most Sustainable
Corporations in the World” list. We are the only U.S.-based health-
care company, and one of just three healthcare companies globally,
to be named to this list each year since its inception. We also were
named one of the “100 Best Corporate Citizens” by Corporate
Responsibility Officer magazine.

to work in an industry where the work we do benefits so many in
such a profound way. Each day, millions of people around the
world rely on Baxter’s life-saving products. Our heritage has been
built on 75 years of innovation in healthcare, and innovation
remains key to Baxter’s future success. I encourage you to read
this annual report devoted to our great history, and a legacy we
are in the process of recapturing.

A HIGHER PURPOSE
Baxter employees around the world are connected by their endur-
ing commitment to save and sustain lives. It is this higher purpose
that binds us as a company and as global citizens. We are privileged

ROBERT L. PARKINSON, JR.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

March 1, 2007

F I N A N C I A L H I G H L I G H T S

3
3

I N N O VA T I O N i n I N T R AV E N O U S T H E R A P Y

In 1931, the year Baxter was founded, intravenous (IV) therapy was a last resort

in most hospitals. Few were equipped to prepare their own IV solutions, which

often were inconsistent in quality and produced adverse reactions in patients.

Baxter solved this problem by producing large batches of IV solutions in glass-

vacuum containers under carefully controlled conditions, shipped ready for use.

Baxter later introduced the world’s first flexible, plastic IV bag and became the

first company to partner with pharmaceutical firms to premix their drugs in IV

solutions for safe and efficient delivery to patients. In recent years, Baxter’s

expertise in IV therapy has extended beyond IV solutions to include electronic

infusion pumps, portable infusion devices, IV nutrition products and other tech-

nologies designed to administer fluids and drugs safely and effectively to patients.

Left: Linda Wyatt loads one-liter IV

Above: In a renovated automobile

bags to be printed and filled at Baxter’s

showroom in Glenview, Illinois, Baxter

plant in Marion, North Carolina. The

produced the first commercially

plant is the only two-time winner of

manufactured IV solutions in glass

the coveted Shingo Prize for excellence

vacuum containers, revolutionizing

in manufacturing.

the field of IV therapy.

Baxter Annual Report 2006

D E L I V E R I N G F L U I D S A N D D R U G S T O P A T I E N T S
I V T H E R A P Y T O D AY

Baxter continues to advance its leadership in IV therapy. In 2006, the company launched AVIVA, a premium line of flexible IV containers
made of non-PVC (non-polyvinyl chloride) film. While Baxter already packages many of its frozen and ready-to-use premixed drugs in non-
PVC containers, AVIVA expands Baxter’s non-PVC offering to a broader range of IV bags. Currently, Baxter is targeting AVIVA to clinicians
desiring non-PVC containers for certain patient populations, such as cancer patients, for whom many drugs are incompatible with PVC.
The company plans to launch additional container sizes for AVIVA in 2007.

Baxter also manufactures electronic infusion pumps, which provide controlled infusion of IV drugs to patients. In June 2006, Baxter
announced a consent decree with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) outlining the steps Baxter must take to resume U.S. sales
of the company’s COLLEAGUE Volumetric Infusion Pump. In December 2006, Baxter received conditional approval from the FDA for the
company’s corrective action plan, and in early 2007, received 510(k) clearance for COLLEAGUE. The company will be upgrading pumps
currently in the U.S. market during the year. Outside the United States, Baxter completed COLLEAGUE modifications to more than 50,000
pumps in 51 countries, finished COLLEAGUE deployment in 34 countries and resumed COLLEAGUE sales in 37 countries as of year-end
2006. Other infusion products include IV administration sets and access systems, and portable infusion systems used in oncology and
pain management.

Nutrition plays an important role in patient care and positive outcomes. While drugs and other medical interventions can alleviate
certain conditions, nutrition is essential to overall patient health, healing and recovery. Nutrition administered intravenously (parenteral
nutrition) provides life-sustaining support for patients who cannot achieve adequate nutritional status through other means.
Unfortunately, proteins, fats and carbohydrates – the primary ingredients in parenteral nutrition – cannot be premixed and remain stable
for any length of time. In 1998, Baxter introduced the first “triple chamber bag” for parenteral nutrition, enabling clinicians to administer
appropriate nutrition to patients in a safe, convenient and cost-effective manner at the point of care. Other Baxter products for parenteral
nutrition include automated compounding devices, and vitamin and mineral formulas. In 2006, Baxter announced plans to form a joint
venture with Guangzhou Baiyunshan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. to produce and sell parenteral nutrition products in China, positioning itself
for growth in that emerging market. The new business initially will manufacture and sell current Baiyunshan parenteral nutrition products
and gradually expand its portfolio to include Baxter products as well.

AVIVA: Baxter’s new premium line of

COLLEAGUE: Electronic infusion

flexible IV containers expands the

pumps provide controlled infusion

company’s non-PVC offering to a

of intravenous solutions and

broader range of IV bags.

medications to patients.

Safety Testing: Thirty-year employee Deborah Rice of Baxter’s Technology Resources

division in Round Lake, Illinois, leads a group that conducts testing on Baxter’s

intravenous solutions and other medical devices.

I N N O VAT I O N i n A N E S T H E S I A a n d D R U G T E C H N O L O G I E S

In recent years, Baxter has expanded its medication delivery capabilities to

include products for anesthesia, as well as advanced drug-formulation and other

drug technologies.Anesthesia has played a major role in making surgery a viable

option in healthcare. Baxter provides products for general anesthesia, which

protects patients from pain during surgery, keeps them still during the operation,

and induces amnesia so they won’t have any “sensitive memory” of the trauma

being inflicted.To achieve all these objectives, different anesthetics are used, both

gases and injectables, the most effective of which are gases, or inhaled anesthetics.

Baxter entered this area of the business in 1998 when it acquired Ohmeda

Pharmaceutical Products, based in New Providence, New Jersey.Today, Baxter

is a leading provider of inhaled anesthetics for general anesthesia.

Left: Chief Certified Registered Nurse

Above: Baxter’s unique and propri-

Anesthetist Arthur Richer (left)

etary drug formulation technologies

administers SUPRANE, Baxter’s

have come a long way since the days

proprietary inhaled anesthetic, to a

of this production worker, shown here

patient at Geisinger Medical Center,

in one of the company’s initial intra-

Danville, Pennsylvania.

venous solution laboratories.

Baxter Annual Report 2006

A D VA N C I N G M E D I C A T I O N D E L I V E R Y
B E YO N D I N T R AV E N O U S T H E R A P Y

Anesthesia represents one of Baxter’s fastest-growing businesses. In 2006, the company expanded its portfolio of inhaled anesthetics in
key markets around the world. Baxter is the only company to offer a proprietary inhaled anesthetic, SUPRANE (desflurane, USP). With
the launch of sevoflurane, a widely used anesthetic, in Australia, China, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the United States in 2006,
Baxter became the first company to offer all three modern inhaled anesthetics for general anesthesia: SUPRANE, sevoflurane and
FORANE (isoflurane, USP). Because each of the gases has different properties, most anesthetists use all three depending on the situation.
Currently, inhaled anesthetics are used predominantly in developed markets, but they are being used increasingly in developing
markets, representing a significant growth opportunity for Baxter. Future opportunities also include potential use of inhaled anesthetics
in intensive care units and other locations outside the operating room.

New drug technologies also present exciting opportunities for Baxter. The company continues to collaborate with Halozyme Therapeutics
on the clinical and commercial development of HYLENEX, the first and only recombinant human hyaluronidase. The technology can
increase the absorption and dispersion of fluids and drugs through subcutaneous infusion, offering a potential alternative to IV
administration for patients with difficult venous access. Baxter plans a number of targeted launches for HYLENEX in 2007 and 2008.

Drug-formulation technologies include PROMAXX, which enables drugs to be formulated into “micro-spheres” for parenteral or pulmonary
delivery. The technology is currently being used in clinical research programs aimed at treating diabetes. At the University of Pittsburgh,
researchers are evaluating PROMAXX technology to deliver “messenger RNA” to patients’ cells to program them not to destroy insulin-
producing cells in the pancreas. In another trial, PROMAXX is being used in the formulation of inhaled insulin.

Baxter also applies its drug delivery expertise to contract manufacturing of pre-filled injectable drugs in vials and syringes. Baxter’s plant
in Bloomington, Indiana, is the largest contract manufacturer of pre-filled syringes in North America. In 2006, the plant was named
“Facility of the Year” by the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering.

Syringe Filling: Baxter’s manufacturing

HYLENEX: The first and only

facility in Bloomington, Indiana, is the

recombinant human hyaluronidase

largest contract manufacturer of

offers a potential subcutaneous

injectable drugs in pre-filled syringes

alternative to IV administration for

in North America.

patients with difficult venous access.

Anesthesia Manufacturing: Brian Rivera of Baxter’s anesthesia plant in Guayama,

Puerto Rico, monitors the packing of SUPRANE, Baxter’s proprietary inhaled

anesthetic. SUPRANE is sold in more than 60 countries.

I N N O VA T I O N i n H E M O P H I L I A T H E R A P Y

In 1952, Baxter acquired Hyland Laboratories, the first company to market

human plasma, derived from whole blood, to treat hemophilia. While plasma

contains higher concentrations of “factor VIII” – the clotting factor missing from

the blood of most people with hemophilia – than whole blood, hemophilia

patients with severe bleeds would still require larger infusions of plasma than

their circulatory systems would allow. In the 1960s, Baxter expanded on

advances in freezing and slow-thawing plasma to produce “cryoprecipitate,”

from which larger concentrations of factor VIII could be obtained. Further

advances in purification and freeze-drying techniques led to factor VIII in

concentrations 400 times greater than that found in plasma. The result was

HEMOFIL, the first commercially produced factor VIII concentrate. Baxter

continues to advance the field of hemophilia therapy.

Left: Technician Jérôme Malavialle of

Above: HEMOFIL, the first commercially

Baxter’s Neuchâtel, Switzerland,

produced factor VIII concentrate for

facility performs a purification step in

treatment of hemophilia, contained

the bulk processing of ADVATE,

concentrations of factor VIII that

Baxter’s leading recombinant factor

were 400 times greater than that

VIII concentrate for hemophilia.

found in human blood plasma.

Baxter Annual Report 2006

I M P R O V I N G H E M O P H I L I A T R E A T M E N T
B U I L D I N G O N A H I S T O R Y O F F I R S T S

Hemophilia affects 15 to 20 of every 100,000 males born worldwide. It is characterized by the absence of, or a defect in, one or more
clotting proteins in the blood. The most common form of hemophilia is hemophilia A, characterized by the absence of factor VIII. People with
hemophilia B lack factor IX. Another class of patients consists of those who develop inhibitors, or antibodies, against factor VIII or IX. Without
treatment, people with hemophilia can suffer permanent joint damage, or even death, from spontaneous and uncontrollable bleeding.

In addition to HEMOFIL, other Baxter “firsts” in the area of hemophilia include Baxter’s factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA), the
first treatment ever developed for patients with inhibitors against factor VIII; the first heat-treated factor VIII, reducing the risk of contamina-
tion by blood-borne viruses at a time when HIV transmission through blood products was a real threat to the hemophilia community; the
first factor VIII concentrate purified by chemical and monoclonal techniques (HEMOFIL M), providing an additional measure of safety; and
the first recombinant factor VIII concentrate (RECOMBINATE), produced genetically in cell culture rather than fractionated from plasma.

In 2006, Baxter’s ADVATE recombinant factor VIII – the company’s latest recombinant factor VIII concentrate – exceeded $850 million in
sales worldwide. Introduced in 2003, ADVATE is the only recombinant factor VIII concentrate produced without any added human or animal
proteins. The launch of ADVATE in Australia and Canada in 2006 made the therapy available in more than 30 countries. The company
plans to launch ADVATE in Japan and Argentina in 2007. Baxter also introduced an ultra-high dosage strength of ADVATE in the United
States in 2006, reducing infusion times for patients requiring large volumes of factor VIII. ADVATE sales are expected to approach $1.1
billion in 2007. Baxter also is working to develop longer-acting forms of ADVATE and other blood-clotting proteins in the bloodstream,
as well as a non-intravenous form of hemophilia treatment.

Also in 2006, Baxter began rolling out a new formulation of FEIBA in Europe. The therapy, FEIBA NF, employs a nanofiltration step as an
additional measure of safety. Baxter will seek additional regulatory approvals for the therapy in 2007.

ADVATE: Sales of Baxter’s leading

BAXJECT II: In 2006, Baxter introduced a

recombinant factor VIII, now available

new needle-less reconstitution device to

in more than 30 countries, are expected

make mixing hemophilia clotting factor

to approach $1.1 billion in 2007.

faster, easier and safer for patients.

Living with Hemophilia: Shawn Whelan, a 21-year-old student at the University of

California at San Diego, has hemophilia A. He started out using Baxter’s HEMOFIL M,

then moved to RECOMBINATE, and now uses ADVATE to help control bleeding

episodes, enabling him to lead an active life. ADVATE is Baxter’s latest recombinant

factor VIII concentrate for treatment of hemophilia A.

I N N O VA T I O N i n P L A S M A P R O T E I N S a n d VA C C I N E S

In 1941, Baxter introduced the PLASMA-VAC system for separating plasma from

whole blood and storing it for later use. Plasma contains a number of proteins that

serve various therapeutic purposes. One is albumin, used to treat victims of shock

and burns. Factor VIII for hemophilia is another plasma protein. Unlike factor VIII,

however, many plasma-based therapies cannot be produced via recombinant

technology, or genetically produced in cell culture.Thus, Baxter has continued to

advance the science of plasma fractionation – the process of breaking down

plasma into its component parts – and its leadership in plasma-based therapies.

Baxter also has established a presence in the global vaccines market. In recent

years, the company has been involved in the development and production of

vaccines targeted at some of the world’s most critical disease concerns, including

meningococcal disease, tick-borne encephalitis, SARS, smallpox and avian flu.

Left: Ron Puentes (foreground) and

Above: Hyland Laboratories, acquired

Ed Gomez prepare equipment for

by Baxter in 1952, was the company’s

cleaning at Baxter’s new state-of-the-

first major acquisition. Hyland was

art plasma fractionation facility in

the first company to market human

Los Angeles, California.

blood plasma for therapeutic purposes.

Baxter Annual Report 2006

F I G H T I N G I N F E C T I O U S D I S E A S E S
N E W F R O N T I E R S

In 2006, Baxter received FDA approval for a new state-of-the-art plasma fractionation facility in Los Angeles. The plant features advanced
technology to improve efficiency and quality in the production of plasma proteins.

One of Baxter’s most important plasma-based therapies is antibody-replacement therapy to help people with immune deficiencies fight
infections. In 2006, Baxter received regulatory approval in Canada for GAMMAGARD Liquid intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). It is used
by patients with primary immune disorders and those on immune-suppressant drugs, such as cancer and transplant patients, to bolster
their immune systems. GAMMAGARD Liquid is the first and only IVIG with no added sugars, sodium or preservatives, a benefit to patients
with diabetes, renal issues or other health problems. It also is the first IVIG to employ a dedicated three-step viral-inactivation/removal
process. Introduced in 2005, GAMMAGARD Liquid is sold throughout the United States, and was approved in Europe in 2006 under the
brand name KIOVIG.

FLEXBUMIN is the first and only albumin packaged in a flexible plastic container. It is the result of combining two core areas of Baxter
expertise – flexible container technology and biologics – to create a truly unique product. All other albumin is packaged in glass bottles.
FLEXBUMIN weighs less, takes up less space and is less prone to breakage than albumin in glass, providing significant benefits to
hospital pharmacies.

Baxter also is supporting studies sponsored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health looking at other potential indications for its plasma-
based products. These include potential use of albumin in treating stroke victims, and a Phase III study on the use of IVIG as a possible
treatment for Alzheimer’s disease.

In vaccines, Baxter announced preliminary results of a Phase I/II clinical trial of its H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine that suggest the
vaccine is well tolerated in humans and may provide wider cross-protection for a larger number of people before and during a pandemic.
This represented the first clinical evaluation of a cell-based H5N1 vaccine, and was the first clinical demonstration that a candidate H5N1
vaccine can induce antibodies that neutralize widely divergent strains of H5N1 virus. Baxter’s unique “vero cell” technology has been a
key factor in Baxter’s selection as a partner in the development and production of vaccines for avian flu and other infectious diseases,
providing potential yield, speed and quality benefits in vaccine production compared to more traditional egg-based systems.

FLEXBUMIN: The first and only

Liquid IVIG: GAMMAGARD Liquid helps

albumin in a flexible container com-

immune-deficient patients fight

bines Baxter’s expertise in container

infections. It is sold in Europe under

technology and biologics.

the brand name KIOVIG.

Vaccine Development : At Baxter’s vaccines plant in the Czech Republic, laboratory

technician Miluse Sykorova checks for microorganisms in nutrient media used to

propagate cells in cell culture. Baxter’s vero cell technology has been a key factor in

Baxter’s selection as a partner in the development and production of vaccines for

avian flu and other infectious diseases.

I N N O VA T I O N i n R E G E N E R A T I V E M E D I C I N E

Using biologics to repair and regenerate tissue is a fast-growing area of medicine.

In recent years, one of Baxter’s fastest-growing businesses has been biosurgery –

novel biomaterials used in surgical applications. Sales of these products reached

nearly $300 million in 2006. The success of these products has been based on

unique Baxter technologies that facilitate tissue-sealing and tissue-repair.Through

collaboration with biotechnology partners, Baxter is broadening its capabilities,

giving the company the potential to develop a portfolio of products to repair and

regenerate both soft and hard tissue, including bone. In addition, the company is

involved in clinical development using adult stem cells to treat chronic myocardial

ischemia, a severe form of coronary artery disease, and is exploring the use of

adult stem cells to repair or regenerate other tissues and organs.

Left: At National University Hospital,

Above: Biosurgery products provide a

Singapore, surgeon Davide Lomanto

different means of tissue-sealing in

(right) applies TISSEEL fibrin sealant

surgery compared to sutures and

to help seal a ruptured spleen.

other conventional procedures.

Baxter Annual Report 2006

B I O S U R G E R Y a n d C E L L U L A R T H E R A P I E S
C U T T I N G - E D G E R E S E A R C H

Baxter’s TISSEEL fibrin sealant contains two plasma-based proteins – fibrinogen and thrombin – which, when mixed, replicate the start of
the tissue-repair process. In January 2007, Kuros Biosurgery AG, with support from Baxter, initiated a Phase II clinical trial involving the
regeneration of bone using a product that combines the capabilities of TISSEEL with proprietary biologics and associated delivery technology
developed by Kuros. Another new biosurgery product, introduced in 2006, is ADEPT, a solution to address post-surgical adhesions in women
who undergo gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Other biosurgery products include FLOSEAL, which helps facilitate rapid hemostasis, or
blood clotting, in surgery; and COSEAL, a vascular sealant.

In the area of cellular therapies, Baxter initiated a Phase II clinical trial (ACT34-CMI) in 2006 to investigate the efficacy, dose, tolerability
and safety of adult, autologous CD34+ stem cells in improving symptoms and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic myocardial
ischemia. This randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study will involve 150 patients who continue to experience
severe chest pain despite being on maximum medical therapy, and who are not suitable candidates for conventional procedures to
improve blood flow to the heart, such as angioplasty, stents or bypass surgery.

In the trial, Baxter’s ISOLEX 300i Magnetic Cell Selection System selects adult CD34+ stem cells from blood collected from the patient. The
stem cells are then injected into areas of the patient’s heart that have poor blood flow. Researchers will conduct follow-up examinations
with the patients for 12 months following the injection of their stem cells. In the Phase I trial, while not designed to demonstrate efficacy,
anecdotal patient reports were encouraging. Fifteen of the 18 total Phase I study subjects who received the cells reported feeling better, with
reductions in chest pain and improved exercise capacity. Baxter expects to complete enrollment in the Phase II trial by 2008. Baxter also is
in the early stages of exploring additional uses of adult CD34+ stem cells in tissue and organ repair and regeneration.

ISOLEX: Baxter’s magnetic cell selec-

ADEPT: One of Baxter’s newest bio-

tion system is being used on an

surgery products addresses post-surgical

experimental basis in treating patients

adhesions in women who undergo

with chronic myocardial ischemia.

gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Stem Cell Therapy: Prior to receiving injections of his own CD34+ stem cells into his

heart, Ron Trachtenberg had been unable to walk more than a very short distance

without pain. Trachtenberg participated in the Phase I CD34+ stem cell trial for

patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. Here, he enjoys one of his favorite

activities – walking with his wife, Deb, and their dog, Cookie, along the beaches of

Cape Cod, Massachusetts.

I N N O VA T I O N i n R E N A L T H E R A P Y

In 1954, a Dutch physician named Willem Kolff was looking for a company

to commercialize a device to remove waste products from the blood – imitating

the role of the kidneys. Baxter’s CEO at the time,William B. Graham, a former

chemist, understood the principles behind Kolff’s device and agreed to fund the

project. In 1956, Baxter introduced the first commercially built artificial kidney,

making life-saving hemodialysis (HD) possible for people with end-stage renal

disease, or irreversible kidney failure. Baxter later made peritoneal dialysis (PD)

a viable, home-based alternative to clinic-based HD with the development of a

flexible, plastic container system for PD solutions.This innovation was a natural

extension for Baxter, building on technologies that previously led to the first

plastic blood-collection and intravenous-solution containers. Baxter remains the

world’s leading provider of products and technologies for PD, advancing home

dialysis treatment around the world.

Left: Dr. Nicanor Vega in the Canary

Above: Before the rotating drum

Islands uses “telemedicine” to

kidney, kidney failure meant swift

remotely monitor a patient on Baxter’s

and certain death for people with

HOMECHOICE APD machine.

end-stage renal disease.

Baxter Annual Report 2006

S O L U T I O N S f o r H O M E D I A L Y S I S
G R O W I N G P D W O R L D W I D E

An estimated 1.5 million people use dialysis in lieu of properly functioning kidneys to cleanse their blood. Only 11 percent of patients
needing dialysis, however, use peritoneal dialysis (PD), representing a major growth opportunity for Baxter, the world’s leading provider
of PD products. PD, as a self-administered therapy that can be done at home rather than in a hospital or clinic, is growing rapidly in
developing and emerging markets, where many people with kidney failure currently go untreated or are under-treated.

In PD, patients infuse solution through a catheter in their abdomen into their abdominal cavity, which is lined by the peritoneal membrane.
This membrane serves as a natural filter, across which the solution draws out toxins and fluid. The used solution is then drained from
the body. There are two forms of PD: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), in which patients manually infuse fresh solution
and drain used solution several times a day; and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), in which the therapy is performed by a machine,
usually overnight while the patient sleeps.

Baxter’s leading portfolio of advanced PD solutions provides unique clinical benefits and enables clinicians to “personalize” dialysis
therapy to meet patient needs. PHYSIONEAL is a base PD solution that is more comfortable to infuse than other base solutions. With many
patients benefitting from reduced glucose intake, Baxter also provides the industry’s only non-glucose-based specialty PD solutions,
EXTRANEAL and NUTRINEAL. EXTRANEAL provides increased fluid removal over a long dwell period in the peritoneum, while NUTRINEAL
gives back amino acids to the patient, in addition to minimizing glucose intake. In geographies where all three solutions are available, many
patients use a regimen that includes all three. In clinical studies, PD patients, including diabetic patients, using these advanced solutions
have shown improved clinical outcomes compared to patients using standard glucose-based solutions.

Baxter continues to work with governments, health ministries and other regulatory bodies to expand the availability and reimbursement
of its PD products to further increase access to PD worldwide. The company also is accelerating product development efforts aimed at
next-generation PD solutions, container systems, connection devices and cycler technology, as well as other clinical applications of its
dialysis technologies.

HOMECHOICE: Baxter’s compact,

EXTRANEAL: This advanced non-

user-friendly APD machine cleanses

glucose-based solution provides

patients’ blood overnight, usually

increased fluid removal over a long

while they sleep.

dwell period for PD patients.

Peritoneal Dialysis: Eva Pettersson of Kristianstad, Sweden, not only has kidney

failure, but is also diabetic. She uses all three of Baxter’s specialty PD solutions –

PHYSIONEAL, EXTRANEAL and NUTRINEAL – to rid her blood of wastes and

excess fluid while minimizing glucose intake. Baxter is the only company to offer

non-glucose-based PD solutions.

G L O B A L E X P A N S I O N

From its humble beginnings in an automobile showroom in Glenview, Illinois,

Baxter has grown into a truly global company.Today, Baxter derives more than

half its sales and earnings from outside the United States, conducting business in

more than 100 countries. Continued global expansion is a key growth strategy

for Baxter, particularly in developing markets, where economic growth leads to

increased healthcare spending. One example is China, where Baxter is expanding

capacity at its four manufacturing plants to accommodate growing demand for

its intravenous and peritoneal dialysis solutions. Latin America is another high-

growth region for Baxter, generating more than $800 million in sales in 2006.

All of Baxter’s businesses continue to identify opportunities to grow through

geographic expansion, with the quality of Baxter products in great demand

throughout the world.

Left: Peng Ling is one of 350 employees

Above: Headquartered in Deerfield,

at Baxter’s plant in Suzhou, China,

Illinois, Baxter today derives more

which manufactures tubing sets and

than half of its sales and earnings

containers for IV and PD solutions.

from outside the United States.

S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y a t B A X T E R

Baxter views sustainability as a long-term approach to balancing its business

priorities with social, economic and environmental responsibilities.The company’s

activities in this area make Baxter a rewarding place to work and develop, and a

socially responsible member of the communities it serves. In 2006,The Baxter

International Foundation awarded 67 grants totaling more than $4 million to

organizations in 20 countries, largely devoted to increasing access to healthcare

in communities where Baxter employees live and work. Baxter also donated

nearly $15 million worth of vital healthcare products to recipients in 44 countries

for disaster relief and humanitarian aid. In early 2007, Baxter was named to

Innovest Strategic Value Advisors’ “Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in

the World” list – the only U.S. healthcare company to be named each year since
the list’s inception – and one of the “100 Best Corporate Citizens” by Corporate
Responsibility Officer magazine.

Left: Baxter’s 48,000 employees

Above: In 1933, just six employees

support their communities in a variety

turned out Baxter’s complete line of

of ways, from volunteerism to partici-

five intravenous solutions in glass

pation in Baxter-sponsored events.

vacuum containers.

2 0 0 6 F I N A N C I A L R E P O R T

33 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION and ANALYSIS

58 MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY for CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

58 MANAGEMENT’S REPORT on INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

59 REPORT of INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

60 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

61 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS of INCOME

62 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS of CASH FLOWS

63 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS of STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY and COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

64 NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

94 DIRECTORS and OFFICERS

95 COMPANY INFORMATION

96 FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY of SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

OVERVIEW

Description of the Business
Baxter International Inc. (Baxter or the company) assists healthcare professionals and their patients with the treatment of complex medical
conditions, including hemophilia, immune disorders, cancer, infectious diseases, kidney disease, trauma and other conditions. The company
applies its expertise in medical devices, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology to make a meaningful difference in patients’ lives.

The company operates in three segments. BioScience is a manufacturer of plasma-based and recombinant proteins used to treat hemophilia;
other biopharmaceutical products, including plasma-based therapies, biosurgery products and vaccines; and technologies used in adult stem-
cell therapies. The business also manufactures manual and automated blood and blood-component separation and collection systems (the
Transfusion Therapies business). Medication Delivery is a manufacturer of a range of intravenous (IV) solutions and other products that are used
for fluid replenishment, general anesthesia, nutrition therapy, pain management, antibiotic therapy, chemotherapy and other therapies. Renal is
a manufacturer and distributor of products used to treat end-stage renal disease, or irreversible kidney failure.

Baxter’s strengths include a global, balanced and diversified business portfolio, with the majority of sales driven by well-recognized brands, as
well as long-standing relationships with healthcare providers. Baxter has approximately 48,000 employees and conducts business in over
100 countries. The company generates over 50% of its revenues outside the United States, and maintains manufacturing and distribution
facilities in a number of locations in the United States, Europe, Canada, Asia, Latin America and Australia.

Year in Review
During the last year, Baxter focused on strengthening its financial condition, accelerating value creation and profitable growth, increasing
research and development (R&D) productivity and innovation, and expanding its geographic presence. The company also remained committed to
improving its fundamental operating strength by reengineering business, quality and administrative processes.

Baxter committed to focus on generating strong and sustainable cash flows and appropriately managing the balance sheet. Cash flows from
operations totaled $2.2 billion in 2006, an increase of over $600 million as compared to 2005. These strong cash flows have provided the
company with the flexibility to return value to its shareholders through continued investment in its businesses, share repurchases and its ongoing
dividend policy. During 2006, the company repurchased 18 million shares for $737 million. Beginning in 2007, the company will convert from an
annual to a quarterly dividend payment schedule and increase its dividend. Due to the progress the company has made in managing the balance
sheet, the company’s net-debt-to-capital ratio declined from 36.7% at December 31, 2005 to 4.8% at December 31, 2006. As a result of this
strengthened financial position, the company’s credit ratings and outlook continued to improve in 2006. The company’s credit ratings on senior
debt were raised from A- to A by Standard & Poor’s and BBB+ to A- by Fitch, and the ratings on short-term debt were raised from A2 to A1 by
Standard & Poor’s. In addition, Standard & Poor’s favorably changed its outlook on Baxter from Stable to Positive during 2006.

Baxter’s net income totaled $1.4 billion, or $2.13 per diluted share, an increase of 40% from 2005. This performance was driven by strong sales
growth and gross margin expansion. Sales increased 5% to $10.4 billion in 2006, while gross margins improved from 41.6% in 2005 to 45.6% in
2006. The company achieved margin improvements in each of the company’s segments, reflecting the company’s broad-based initiatives to build
shareholder value through focused execution.

In the BioScience segment, ADVATE (Antihemophilic factor (Recombinant), Plasma/Albumin-Free Method) rAHF-PFM, the company’s advanced
recombinant therapy for the treatment of hemophilia A, continued to generate strong sales growth, with sales in 2006 exceeding $850 million.
With the launch of ADVATE in Australia and Canada in 2006, ADVATE is now available in more than 30 countries. Also in 2006, the company
introduced an ultra-high dosage strength of ADVATE, reducing the volume of drug and infusion time for patients requiring large doses of factor VIII.
ADVATE sales are expected to approach $1.1 billion in 2007. The BioScience segment’s results were also favorably impacted by continued
customer conversions to the liquid formulation of IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin) and improving dynamics in the plasma protein market.

In the Medication Delivery segment, sales of IV solutions, specialty nutrition products and disposable sets used with infusion pumps continued to
generate solid sales growth. Sales were also favorably impacted by an acceleration of revenues associated with the company’s pharmaceutical
partnering business as a result of capacity expansion at the company’s manufacturing facility in Bloomington, Indiana. However, the Medication
Delivery segment faced several challenges in 2006, including the impact of generic competition and a hold on shipments of the COLLEAGUE
infusion pump, causing a decline in the segment’s sales for the year. As discussed further below, the company recorded special charges in both
2006 and 2005 for costs associated with correcting these issues. As a result of the hold, there were no sales of the COLLEAGUE infusion pump
during the last six months of 2005 or the first six months of 2006. By the end of 2006, the remediation plan outside of the United States was

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

substantially complete, and sales of COLLEAGUE pumps had resumed in all key markets outside of the United States. In December 2006, the
company received conditional approval for the company’s corrective action plan from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On
February 27, 2007, the company received clearance from the FDA on its COLLEAGUE infusion pump 510(k) pre-market notification. The company is
preparing to modify pumps currently in the United States and will soon submit manufacturing and service documentation to the FDA in advance of
deploying upgrades to these COLLEAGUE infusion pumps.

In the Renal segment, use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) products continued to grow steadily, particularly in developing markets, where many people
with end-stage renal disease are currently under-treated. In 2006, the company experienced patient growth in all major markets, most
significantly in Asia and Latin America. The growth in this segment reflects the company’s renewed focus on PD, which has strengthened the
company’s leadership position in PD in many regions of the world.

Baxter’s improved financial condition has allowed the company to accelerate its overall level of R&D spending. In 2006, R&D expenditures
increased 15% to $614 million, reflecting Baxter’s continued commitment to reinvigorate innovation within the company. Contributing to the
increased R&D expenses in 2006 were investments in the company’s adult stem-cell program, as well as other investments to advance the
company’s pipeline of specialty plasma therapeutics and hemophilia and other recombinant products, and to expand the company’s product
portfolio into the area of regenerative medicine.

On October 2, 2006, the company entered into a definitive agreement to sell substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the Transfusion
Therapies (TT) business to an affiliate of Texas Pacific Group for $540 million. The decision to sell the TT net assets was based on the results of
strategic and financial reviews of the company’s business portfolio, and will allow the company to increase its focus and investment on
businesses with more long-term strategic value to the company. The sale is expected to close in the first quarter of 2007.

Global expansion continued to be a growth strategy for the company, particularly in developing markets. In 2006, the company announced plans
to make a significant investment to expand production capacity at its four manufacturing facilities in China to support sales growth in the
Medication Delivery and Renal segments. In addition, the company announced plans to establish a joint venture with Guangzhou Baiyunshan
Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. to produce and sell parenteral nutrition products in China.

During 2006, the company continued to reengineer many areas of the business, including financial systems and processes, quality and regulatory
systems, and the company’s strategic planning process. These activities have resulted in a more cost-effective and efficient organization, and
have cultivated quality and operational excellence throughout our systems and culture.

Looking Forward
For the upcoming year, the company intends to focus on delivering shareholder value and generating profitable growth by continuing to expand
geographically, increasing R&D productivity and innovation, strengthening its overall product development and quality processes, and pursuing
appropriate business development initiatives.

In 2007, global expansion is expected to remain a growth strategy for the company, particularly in developing markets. To reach its goal of
increasing R&D productivity and innovation, the company plans to continue to enhance the prioritization, management and approval of R&D
projects, create an environment that rewards science and innovation, and leverage the company’s core strengths to expand into new therapeutic
areas. With increased R&D expenditures expected in 2007, the company will continue to deploy disciplined prioritization and product
development processes that ensure that R&D expenditures match business growth strategies and key financial return metrics.

The company plans to continue to accelerate sales growth by further strengthening its relationships with healthcare providers, enhancing its
market positions in existing geographies and expanding to new geographies, and optimizing its current business portfolio. The company is
seeking out and capitalizing on opportunities to expand the company’s gross margin and aggressively reduce administrative costs, with a focus
on strengthening the company’s operational excellence. Baxter will also continue to focus on generating strong and sustainable cash flows to
drive shareholder value.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Adoption of SFAS No. 123-R
The company’s results in 2006 were impacted by the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004),
“Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123-R) on January 1, 2006. This new standard requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

options and similar awards. The company adopted SFAS No. 123-R using the modified prospective transition method. Therefore, the prior year
consolidated statements of income were not restated. The adoption of SFAS No. 123-R resulted in incremental expense in 2006 of $77 million
($53 million on a net-of-tax basis, or $0.08 per diluted share).

Net Sales

years ended December 31 (in millions)
BioScience
Medication Delivery
Renal
Total net sales

years ended December 31 (in millions)
United States
International
Total net sales

2006
$ 4,396
3,917
2,065
$10,378

2006
$ 4,589
5,789
$10,378

2005
$3,852
3,990
2,007
$9,849

2005
$4,383
5,466
$9,849

2004
$3,504
4,047
1,958
$9,509

2004
$4,460
5,049
$9,509

Percent change

2006
14%
(2%)
3%
5%

Percent change

2006
5%
6%
5%

2005
10%
(1%)
3%
4%

2005
(2%)
8%
4%

Foreign exchange did not have a material impact on sales growth in 2006. In 2005, foreign exchange benefited sales growth by 2 percentage
points, primarily because the U.S. Dollar weakened relative to the Euro.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year sales by product line data within the BioScience and Renal segments to conform to the
current year presentation. Specifically, for BioScience, sales of Tisseel, FloSeal and CoSeal are now reported in BioSurgery and sales of plasma to
third parties, and contract manufacturing revenues are now reported in Other. Tisseel, sales of plasma to third parties and contract manufacturing
revenues were previously reported in Plasma Proteins and sales of FloSeal and CoSeal were previously reported in Other. For Renal, sales of
pharmaceutical and certain other products, which were previously reported in Other, are now reported in PD Therapy. There were no sales
reclassifications between segments.

BioScience Net sales in the BioScience segment increased 14% in 2006 and 10% in 2005 (with no impact from foreign currency fluctuations in
2006 and a 1 percentage point favorable impact in 2005).

The following is a summary of sales by significant product line.

years ended December 31 (in millions)
Recombinants
Plasma Proteins
Antibody Therapy
BioSurgery
Transfusion Therapies
Other
Total net sales

2006
$1,696
881
785
298
516
220
$4,396

2005
$1,527
709
452
266
547
351
$3,852

2004
$1,329
655
336
229
550
405
$3,504

Percent change

2006
11%
24%
74%
12%
(6%)
(37%)
14%

2005
15%
8%
35%
16%
(1%)
(13%)
10%

Recombinants
The primary driver of sales growth in the BioScience segment during 2006 and 2005 was increased sales volume of recombinant factor VIII
products. Factor VIII products are used in the treatment of hemophilia A, which is a bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency in blood clotting
factor VIII. Sales growth was fueled by the continuing adoption by customers of the advanced recombinant therapy, ADVATE. Sales of ADVATE
totaled over $850 million in 2006. ADVATE is the first and only factor VIII product made without any added human or animal proteins in the cell
culture, purification or final formulation process, thereby eliminating the risk of infections caused by viruses that could potentially be contained in
these proteins.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Plasma Proteins
This product line includes plasma-derived hemophilia treatments, albumin and certain other specialty therapeutics, including FEIBA, an anti-
inhibitor coagulant complex, and ARALAST (alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor (human)) for the treatment of hereditary emphysema. Sales growth in
2006 and 2005 was driven by increased sales of FEIBA and several other plasma protein products. In addition, the increase in sales in 2006 was
due to increased volume resulting from the 2005 plasma procurement agreement with the American Red Cross (ARC). Effective at the beginning of
the third quarter of 2005, the company and the ARC terminated their contract manufacturing agreement (2005 revenues associated with this
arrangement are reported in the Other product line) and replaced it with the plasma procurement agreement.

Antibody Therapy
Higher sales of IVIG, which is used in the treatment of immune deficiencies, fueled sales growth during both 2006 and 2005, with increased
volume, continuing improvements in pricing in the United States, and continuing customer conversions to the liquid formulation of the product,
which was launched in the United States in September 2005. Since it does not need to be reconstituted prior to infusion, the liquid formulation
offers added convenience for clinicians and patients. Sales of WinRho SDF [Rho(D) Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human)], which is a product
used to treat a critical bleeding disorder, also contributed to the product line’s sales growth in 2006 and 2005. The company acquired the U.S.
marketing and distribution rights relating to this product at the end of the first quarter of 2005, and launched the liquid formulation of WinRho
during the first quarter of 2006.

BioSurgery
This product line includes plasma-based and non-plasma-based products for hemostasis, wound-sealing and tissue regeneration. Sales growth
in 2006 and 2005 was principally driven by increased sales of the company’s non-plasma-based sealants, FloSeal and CoSeal.

Transfusion Therapies
The transfusion therapies product line includes products and systems for use in the collection and preparation of blood and blood components.
Sales volume and pricing was unfavorably impacted by consolidation by customers in the plasma industry in both 2006 and 2005. Partially
offsetting this impact in 2005 were increased sales in the United States of ALYX, a system for the automated collection of red blood cells and
plasma, and, in 2006, a $14 million sale of AMICUS Separators, a device used for platelet and multi-component collection. See Note 3 for
information regarding the company’s execution of a definitive agreement in October 2006 to sell substantially all of the assets and liabilities of
this business.

Other
Other BioScience products primarily consist of vaccines and sales of plasma to third parties. The decline in sales in this product line for 2006 and
2005 was due to the decline in sales of plasma to third parties as a result of the company’s decision to exit certain lower-margin contracts. In
addition, the termination of the above-mentioned contract manufacturing agreement with the ARC in mid-2005 contributed to the decline in sales
for 2006. Partially offsetting these declines in 2006 and 2005 were increased sales of vaccines, principally due to sales of FSME Immun (for the
prevention of tick-borne encephalitis) and, in 2005, NeisVac-C (for the prevention of meningitis C). Sales of vaccines may fluctuate from period to
period based on the timing of government tenders.

Medication Delivery Net sales for the Medication Delivery segment decreased 2% and 1% in 2006 and 2005, respectively (with no impact from
foreign currency fluctuations in 2006 and a 2 percentage point favorable impact in 2005).

The following is a summary of sales by significant product line.

2006

$1,285
832
817
938
45
$3,917

2005

$1,225
818
853
1,021
73
$3,990

2004

$1,154
840
928
1,037
88
$4,047

Percent change

2006

5%
2%
(4%)
(8%)
(38%)
(2%)

2005

6%
(3%)
(8%)
(2%)
(17%)
(1%)

years ended December 31 (in millions)

IV Therapies
Drug Delivery
Infusion Systems
Anesthesia and Injectable Drugs
Other
Total net sales

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

IV Therapies
This product line principally consists of IV solutions and nutritional products. The IV Therapies product line generated solid U.S. and international
sales growth in both 2006 and 2005. Sales growth in 2006 was particularly impacted by strong sales of nutritional products outside of the United
States.

Drug Delivery
This product line primarily consists of pre-mixed drugs and contract services, principally for pharmaceutical and biotechnology customers. Sales
growth in 2006 was driven by accelerated sales associated with the company’s pharmaceutical company partnering business. Sales levels in
both 2006 and 2005 were unfavorably impacted by pricing pressures from generic competition related to the expiration of the patent for
Rocephin, a frozen pre-mixed antibiotic that the company manufactured for Roche Pharmaceuticals. The trend in sales over the three-year period
was also impacted by a $10 million order in 2005 and a $45 million order in 2004 by the U.S. government related to its biodefense program,
unfavorably impacting sales growth in both 2006 and 2005. Partially offsetting these sales declines in 2005 were increased sales of small volume
parenterals.

Infusion Systems
Sales of electronic infusion pumps declined in 2006 and 2005 principally due to the company’s stopping shipment in July 2005 of new
COLLEAGUE infusion pumps as a result of certain pump design issues. Refer to Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements and the
COLLEAGUE MATTER section below for additional information, including the charges recorded during 2006 and 2005 relating to this matter. As a
result of the company’s stopping shipment of new COLLEAGUE infusion pumps, there were no sales of the pumps in the last six months of 2005 or
the first six months of 2006. The company’s sales of COLLEAGUE pumps totaled approximately $85 million in the first half of 2005, and
approximately $170 million in 2004. By the end of 2006, sales of COLLEAGUE pumps had resumed in all key markets outside of the United States.
Partially offsetting these declines in 2006 and 2005 were increased sales of disposable tubing sets used with pumps and solid sales growth in
other products outside the United States.

Anesthesia and Injectable Drugs
The primary reason for the decrease in sales in this product line during 2006 and 2005 was the decline in both sales volume and pricing of generic
propofol and other multi-source generic products as a result of additional competition. Partially offsetting this sales decline in 2006 and 2005
were increased sales relating to the launch of a new generic vial product, ceftriaxone, higher international sales of SUPRANE (desflurane, USP) and
the impact of market launches of sevoflurane. Both SUPRANE and sevoflurane are inhaled anesthetic agents.

Other
This category primarily includes other hospital-distributed products in international markets. The decline in sales during 2006 and 2005 was
largely due to the continued exit of certain lower-margin distribution businesses outside the United States.

Renal Net sales in the Renal segment increased 3% in 2006 and 3% in 2005 (with no impact from foreign currency fluctuations in 2006 and a
3 percentage point favorable impact in 2005).

The following is a summary of sales by significant product line.

years ended December 31 (in millions)

PD Therapy
HD Therapy
Total net sales

2006

$1,634
431
$2,065

2005

$1,553
454
$2,007

2004

$1,459
499
$1,958

Percent change

2006

5%
(5%)
3%

2005

6%
(9%)
3%

PD Therapy
Peritoneal dialysis, or PD Therapy, is a dialysis treatment method for end-stage renal disease. PD Therapy, which is used primarily at home, uses
the peritoneal membrane, or abdominal lining, as a natural filter to remove waste from the bloodstream. The sales growth in both 2006 and 2005
was primarily driven by an increased number of patients in all major markets, most significantly in Asia and Latin America. Increased penetration
of PD Therapy products continues to be strong in emerging markets, where many people with end-stage renal disease are currently under-treated.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

HD Therapy
Hemodialysis, or HD Therapy, is another form of end-stage renal disease dialysis therapy, which is generally performed in a hospital or outpatient
center. HD Therapy works by removing wastes and fluid from the blood by using a machine and a filter, also known as a dialyzer. The sales decline
during 2006 was principally due to the divestiture of the Renal Therapy Services (RTS) business in Taiwan at the end of the first quarter of 2005.
Revenues relating to this business totaled approximately $20 million during the first quarter of 2005. Total revenue from the segment’s services
businesses has declined due to the company’s decision to exit these lower-margin businesses. Consistent with this strategy, in the fourth quarter
of 2006, the company divested its RTS business in the United Kingdom. Annual sales related to this business were not material. As further
discussed below and in Note 4, in 2005, the company decided to discontinue the manufacture of HD instruments. Separately, the company
entered into an arrangement with Gambro Renal Products (Gambro) to distribute Gambro’s HD instruments and related ancillary products. The
decision and new arrangement have not had a significant impact on sales.

Gross Margin and Expense Ratios

years ended December 31 (as a percent of sales)

Gross margin
Marketing and administrative expenses

2006

45.6%
22.0%

2005

41.6%
20.6%

2004

41.2%
20.6%

Gross Margin
2006 vs. 2005 The improvement in gross margin in 2006 was principally driven by an improved mix of sales, largely the result of continued
customer adoption of ADVATE, customer conversion to the liquid formulation of IVIG, manufacturing efficiencies and yield improvements, as well
as improved pricing for certain plasma protein products, increased demand for specialty therapeutics, and the exiting of certain lower-margin
businesses. Also contributing to the improvement were reduced losses related to the company’s cash flow hedges and the net impact of certain
special charges and other costs recorded in both 2006 and 2005 (as further discussed below). These improvements were partially offset by the
impact of generic competition and the hold on shipments of new COLLEAGUE pumps, which began in July 2005 and continues in the United
States.

Included in the company’s gross margin in 2006 were pre-tax charges of $76 million and other costs of $18 million relating to the company’s
COLLEAGUE and SYNDEO infusion pumps. These costs decreased the gross margin by approximately 1.0 percentage point in 2006. Included in the
company’s gross margin in 2005 were $176 million of special charges, which decreased the gross margin by approximately 1.7 percentage
points. The 2005 special charges consisted of $77 million related to costs associated with correcting the issues related to the COLLEAGUE
infusion pump, $49 million related to costs associated with withdrawing the 6060 multi-therapy infusion pump and $50 million related to the
company’s decision to discontinue the manufacture of the Renal segment’s HD instruments. Refer to Note 4 for additional information on these
special charges and costs.

2005 vs. 2004 The improvement in gross margin in 2005 was principally driven by increased sales of higher-margin recombinant products,
largely the result of customer adoption of ADVATE, improved pricing for certain products, such as IVIG, as well as continuing benefits from the
company’s restructuring initiatives. These improvements were partially offset by the net impact (1.3 percentage points of gross margin) of certain
special charges recorded in both 2005 (as discussed above) and 2004, as well as increased costs associated with the company’s pension plans
(as further discussed below) and increased raw material costs. During 2004, the company recorded $28 million of inventory charges related to the
BioScience segment (as further discussed in Note 1) and $17 million of foreign currency hedge adjustments (as further discussed in Note 6),
which decreased the gross margin in 2004 by 0.4 percentage points.

Marketing and Administrative Expenses
2006 vs. 2005 The marketing and administrative expenses ratio increased during 2006, with the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R on January 1, 2006
contributing approximately 40% of the increase. The remainder of the increase in the ratio was principally due to increased benefit costs,
spending relating to new marketing programs and product launches, and certain reorganizational initiatives.

2005 vs. 2004 The marketing and administrative expenses ratio was unchanged from 2004 to 2005. Certain expenses declined due to cost
savings relating to the company’s restructuring initiatives and other actions designed to reduce the company’s expense base, along with net
favorable adjustments to receivables. In addition, as discussed in Note 1, $55 million in charges relating to receivables were recorded in 2004,
which increased the expense ratio in that year. Offsetting these reductions in expenses in 2005 were increased pension plan costs and higher
spending on marketing programs in the BioScience segment.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Pension Plan Costs
Pension plan costs increased $27 million in 2006 and $53 million in 2005, as detailed in Note 8, unfavorably impacting the company’s gross
margin and expense ratio in both 2006 and 2005. The increased costs were partially due to higher actuarial loss amortization expense, a change
in the actuarial mortality tables used in the valuations and demographics, and a decrease in the interest rate used to discount certain of the
international plans’ benefit obligations. Partially offsetting these factors were higher investment returns due to the $574 million of contributions
made to the company’s pension plans in 2005, as well as additional contributions made during 2006.

The company’s pension plan costs are expected to decrease by approximately $31 million in 2007, from $183 million in 2006 to approximately
$152 million in 2007. The expected $31 million decrease is principally due to an increase in the interest rate used to discount the plans’ projected
benefit obligations, coupled with the impact of the expected divestiture of the Transfusion Therapies business. The expected costs in 2007 of
$152 million include $97 million of expected amortization of actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs and credits, and transition assets and
obligations, which is detailed in Note 8. For the domestic plans, the discount rate will increase to 6.00% and the expected return on plan assets
will remain at 8.5% for 2007. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies section below for a discussion of how the pension plan assumptions are
developed, mortality tables are selected, and actuarial losses are amortized, and the impact of these factors on pension plan expense.

Research and Development

years ended December 31 (in millions)

Research and development expenses
as a percent of sales

2006

$614
5.9%

2005

$533
5.4%

2004

$517
5.4%

Percent change

2006

15%

2005

R&D expenses increased in both 2006 and 2005, reflecting the company’s commitment to accelerate R&D investments. Increased spending on
certain projects, primarily in the BioScience segment, was partially offset by restructuring-related cost savings, particularly in 2005. Contributing
to the increased R&D expenses in 2006 were investments in the company’s adult stem-cell program, as further discussed below, as well as other
investments to advance the company’s pipeline of specialty plasma therapeutics and hemophilia and other recombinant products, and to
expand the company’s product portfolio into the area of regenerative medicine.

The company’s strategy is to focus investments on key R&D initiatives that the company believes will maximize its resources and generate the
most significant return on its investments. To reach its goal of increasing R&D productivity and innovation, the company plans to continue to
enhance the prioritization, management and approval of projects, create an environment that rewards science and innovation, and leverage the
company’s core strengths to expand into new therapeutic areas. In 2007, the company expects to continue to accelerate its investment in R&D as
part of the overall achievement of these goals. The company will continue to deploy disciplined prioritization and product development processes
that ensure that R&D expenditures match business growth strategies and key financial return metrics.

Approvals
The company’s R&D activities resulted in the following FDA approvals in 2006:

• BAXJECT II, a next-generation needle-less transfer device that makes reconstituting hemophilia clotting factor easier and safer for patients;

• A new ultra-high dosage strength of ADVATE, reducing both the volume of drug and infusion time required for hemophilia patients needing

high doses of factor VIII;

• AVIVA, a premium line of IV solutions that provides similar functionality and benefits of the company’s existing VIAFLEX flexible container
systems, but offers customers a container that is made of non-polyvinyl chloride film and provides a DEHP-free [di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-
free] and latex-free fluid pathway to patients;

• Ondansetron Injection USP, which is used for the prevention of nausea and vomiting, in both vial and pre-mix presentations; and

• The company’s new plasma fractionation facility in Los Angeles, California for the production of albumin and lyophilized IVIG.

Regulatory approvals received outside the United States in 2006 included the approval of ADVATE in Japan and Canada, and the company’s liquid
IVIG product in Europe and Canada.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Pipeline
In 2006, the company also continued to make solid progress with respect to its R&D pipeline. Key accomplishments included the following:

• The initiation of Phase II clinical trials on the use of adult stem cells to treat chronic myocardial ischemia, a severe form of coronary artery

disease;

• Preliminary results of a Phase I/II clinical trial of the company’s H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine;

• The initiation of the development of a recombinant form of von Willebrand factor, a protein critical to the normal clotting of blood;

• A collaborative research program with Jerini AG aimed at developing a non-intravenous form of hemophilia treatment;

• The initiation of a Phase II clinical trial involving the regeneration of bone, using a product co-developed with Kuros Biosurgery AG under a

long-term research and development agreement;

• Continuing support of the company’s clinical and commercial development collaboration with Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. involving

HYLENEX, a drug delivery technology to enhance the absorption of injectable drugs;

• Involvement in early-stage clinical trials involving the use of IVIG to treat Alzheimer’s disease; and

• The initiation of clinical trials exploring the use of the company’s proprietary PROMAXX drug-formulation technology to enable drugs to be

formulated into “micro-spheres” for parenteral or pulmonary delivery to treat diabetes.

Restructuring Charges, Net
The following is a summary of restructuring charges recorded by the company in 2004, and income adjustments recorded in 2005 related to
restructuring charges. See Note 4 for additional information.

2005 Adjustments to Restructuring Charges
During 2005, the company recorded a $109 million benefit ($83 million, or $0.13 per diluted share, on an after-tax basis) relating to the
adjustment of restructuring charges recorded in 2004 (as further discussed below) and a prior restructuring program, as the implementation of
the programs progressed, actions were completed, and the company refined its estimates of remaining spending. The restructuring reserve
adjustments principally related to severance and other employee-related costs. The company’s targeted headcount reductions were achieved
with a higher level of attrition than originally anticipated. Accordingly, the company’s severance payments were projected to be lower than
originally estimated. The remaining reserve adjustments principally related to changes in estimates regarding certain contract termination costs,
certain adjustments related to asset disposal proceeds that were in excess of original estimates, and the finalization of certain employment
termination arrangements. Additional adjustments may be recorded in the future as the restructuring programs are completed.

2004 Restructuring Charge
In 2004, the company recorded a $543 million restructuring charge ($394 million, or $0.64 per diluted share, on an after-tax basis), principally
associated with the company’s decision to implement actions to reduce the company’s overall cost structure and to drive sustainable
improvements in financial performance. The charge was primarily for severance and costs associated with the closing of facilities and the
exiting of contracts. These actions included the elimination of over 4,000 positions, or 8% of the global workforce, as the company was
reorganized and streamlined.

During 2006 and 2005, $38 million and $101 million, respectively, of the reserve for cash costs was utilized. Substantially all of the remaining
reserve of $55 million is expected to be utilized in 2007, with the rest of the cash outflows principally relating to certain long-term leases and
remaining employee severance payments. The company believes that the restructuring program is substantially complete and that the remaining
reserves are adequate. However, remaining cash payments are subject to change. The payments are being funded with cash generated from
operations.

The company estimates that the 2004 restructuring initiative yielded savings of approximately $0.07 per diluted share during 2006 and $0.22 per
diluted share during 2005. The program is substantially complete, and the company does not expect incremental cost savings in 2007. The
company realized the total cumulative savings originally estimated for this restructuring program.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Other Special Charges
In 2004, the company recorded a $289 million impairment charge (classified in the other special charges line in the consolidated statement of
income) relating to its PreFluCel influenza vaccine, recombinant erythropoietin drug (EPOMAX) for the treatment of anemia, and Thousand Oaks
Suite D manufacturing assets. The net-of-tax impact of these impairment charges was $245 million ($0.40 per diluted share). Refer to Note 4 for
additional information.

Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense decreased $84 million, or 71%, in 2006, due largely to a lower average debt level and a higher average cash balance. As
discussed further below, the lower average debt level was due to the November 2005 retirement of $1 billion of the senior notes included in the
equity units and the redemption of approximately $500 million of the company’s 5.25% notes. Also, during the first quarter of 2006, certain
maturing debt was paid down using a portion of the $1.25 billion cash proceeds upon settlement of the equity units purchase contracts in
February 2006. Partially offsetting these decreases in the debt balance was the company’s issuance of $600 million of term debt in the third
quarter of 2006. In 2005, net interest expense increased $19 million, or 19%, due to higher interest rates and the execution of the net investment
hedge mirror strategy, as further discussed below, partially offset by a lower average debt level and higher interest income.

Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net was $61 million in 2006 and $77 million in both 2005 and 2004. Refer to Note 2 for a table that details the components of
other expense, net for the three years ended December 31, 2006.

Pre-Tax Income
Refer to Note 11 for a summary of financial results by segment. Certain items are maintained at the company’s corporate level and are not
allocated to the segments. These items primarily include certain foreign exchange fluctuations, the majority of the foreign currency and interest
rate hedging activities, net interest expense, income and expense related to certain non-strategic investments, corporate headquarters costs,
certain employee benefit plan costs, stock compensation, certain nonrecurring gains and losses and certain special charges (such as
restructuring and certain asset impairments). The following is a summary of significant factors impacting the segments’ financial results.

BioScience Pre-tax income increased 46% and 42% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The primary drivers of the increase in pre-tax income in
both 2006 and 2005 were strong sales of higher-margin products, which were fueled by the continued customer adoption of ADVATE and
improved volumes and pricing in certain product lines. The increase in pre-tax earnings in 2006 was also due to customer conversion to the liquid
formulation of IVIG, the incremental volume relating to the ARC plasma procurement agreement, and continued cost and yield improvements.
Also contributing to the increased pre-tax earnings in 2005 was the close management of costs relative to 2004, restructuring-related benefits,
the impact of the 2004 special charges discussed above, and foreign exchange fluctuations (as noted above, the majority of foreign exchange
hedging activities for all segments are recorded at the corporate level, and are not included in segment results). Partially offsetting the growth in
both 2006 and 2005 was the impact of higher spending on new marketing programs and product launches, as well as increased R&D spending.

Medication Delivery Pre-tax income decreased 5% and 22% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The primary drivers of the decline in pre-tax income
in 2006 and 2005 were the impact of generic competition for certain products and the company’s hold on shipments of new COLLEAGUE pumps,
which began in July 2005 and continues in the United States. Included in pre-tax income in 2006 and 2005 were $94 million (consisting of a
charge of $76 million and other costs of $18 million) and $126 million, respectively, relating to the COLLEAGUE, SYNDEO and 6060 infusion pump
charges, as discussed above. Pre-tax earnings in 2006 were also unfavorably impacted by $14 million of net losses relating to asset dispositions,
as well as certain reorganizational initiatives. In addition, the decline in pre-tax earnings in 2006 and 2005 was driven by the impact of a
$10 million order in 2005 and a $45 million order in 2004 by the U.S. government related to its biodefense program. Partially offsetting these
items in 2005 were the continued benefits from the restructuring program and foreign exchange fluctuations.

Renal Pre-tax income increased 14% in 2006 and decreased 10% in 2005. The increase in pre-tax income in 2006 was principally due to an
improved mix of sales and the impact of an $8 million gain related to an asset disposition, partially offset by higher R&D spending and the impact
of foreign currency fluctuations. The decrease in pre-tax income in 2005 was principally due to the $50 million charge associated with the exit of
the hemodialysis instruments manufacturing business. Partially offsetting the decline in 2005 was the impact of the close management of costs
relative to 2004, restructuring-related benefits, reduced R&D spending and foreign currency fluctuations.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Other As mentioned above, certain income and expense amounts are not allocated to the segments. These amounts are detailed in the table in
Note 11 and include restructuring charges and adjustments, net interest expense, certain foreign exchange fluctuations and hedging activities,
other special charges, costs relating to the early extinguishment of debt, stock compensation expense, and other corporate items. Refer to the
discussion above regarding net interest expense, stock compensation expense and restructuring charges and adjustments. The expense
associated with foreign exchange fluctuations and hedging activities declined in both 2006 and 2005 principally due to reduced expenses
related to the company’s cash flow hedges. The expense associated with other corporate items increased in 2006 and 2005. In 2006, this
increase was due in part to a reduction in royalty income resulting from the expiration of the patent on sevoflurane and increased spending
related to the company’s adult stem-cell therapy program, partially offset by a $17 million gain related to an asset disposition. Additionally, the
increase in the expense for other corporate items in both 2006 and 2005 was partially due to increased pension plan costs each year.

Income Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 20% in 2006, 34% in 2005 and 11% in 2004. Excluding any discrete items, management anticipates that the
effective income tax rate will be approximately 20.5% to 21.5% in 2007.

The company’s effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate each year due to certain operations that are subject to tax incentives,
state and local taxes, and foreign taxes that are in excess of the U.S. federal statutory rate. In addition, as discussed further below, the company’s
effective income tax rate can be impacted in any given year by discrete factors or events.

2006
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the company reached a favorable settlement with the Internal Revenue Service relating to the company’s U.S.
federal tax audits for the years 2002 through 2005, resulting in a $135 million reduction of tax expense. In combination with this settlement, the
company reorganized its Puerto Rico manufacturing assets and repatriated funds from other subsidiaries resulting in tax expense of $113 million
($86 million related to the repatriations and $27 million related to operations subject to tax incentives). The effect of these items was the
utilization and realization of deferred tax assets that were previously subject to valuation allowances, as well as a modest reduction in the
company’s reserves for uncertain tax positions, resulting in a net $22 million benefit and minimal cash impact.

2005
In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) was enacted. The Act created a one-time incentive for U.S. corporations to
repatriate undistributed foreign earnings by providing an 85% dividends received deduction. This allowed U.S. companies to repatriate
non-U.S. earnings through 2005 at a substantially reduced rate, provided that certain criteria were met. During the fourth quarter of 2005 the
company repatriated $2.1 billion in earnings previously considered indefinitely reinvested outside the United States. The company recorded
income tax expense of $191 million associated with this repatriation. In addition, the company recognized income tax expense of $38 million
relating to certain earnings outside the United States, which were not deemed indefinitely reinvested, together totaling $229 million of income
tax on repatriations of foreign earnings.

The effective tax rate for 2005 was also impacted by favorable adjustments to restructuring charges, which are further discussed in Note 4, and
which were tax-effected at varying rates, depending on the tax jurisdiction.

2004
The effective income tax rate in 2004 was impacted by favorable settlements in certain jurisdictions around the world. As a result of the
completion of tax audits in 2004, $55 million of reserves for matters previously under review were reversed into income. Also impacting the
effective tax rate was $289 million of special charges, which are further discussed in Note 4, and which were tax-effected at varying rates,
depending on the tax jurisdiction.

Refer to Note 9 for further information regarding the company’s income taxes.

Income From Continuing Operations and Related per Diluted Share Amounts
Income from continuing operations was $1,398 million in 2006, $958 million in 2005 and $383 million in 2004. The corresponding net earnings
per diluted share were $2.13 in 2006, $1.52 in 2005 and $0.62 in 2004. The significant factors and events causing the net changes from 2005 to
2006 and from 2004 to 2005 are discussed above.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

(Loss) Income From Discontinued Operations
In 2002, the company decided to divest certain businesses, principally the majority of the services businesses included in the Renal segment. The
company’s decision was based on an evaluation of the company’s business strategy and the economic conditions in certain geographic markets.
Most of the divestitures were completed in 2003 and 2004, and at December 31, 2006, the divestiture plan was complete.

Changes in Accounting Principles
SFAS No. 123-R
The company adopted SFAS No. 123-R on January 1, 2006. This new standard requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock
options and similar awards. The company adopted SFAS No. 123-R using the modified prospective transition method.

Stock compensation expense measured in accordance with SFAS No. 123-R totaled $94 million ($63 million on a net-of-tax basis, or $0.10 per
basic and diluted share) for 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 123-R resulted in increased expense of $77 million ($53 million on a net-of-tax basis,
or $0.08 per basic and diluted share), as compared to the stock compensation expense that would have been recorded pursuant to Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations (APB No. 25) (relating to RSU and
restricted stock plans only). Approximately $9 million and $15 million of pre-tax expense was recorded under APB No. 25 for 2005 and 2004,
respectively.

In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related
to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards” (FSP No. 123(R)-3). The company elected to adopt the alternative transition
method provided in FSP 123(R)-3 for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123-R. The alternative
transition method provides a different method to establish the beginning balance of the additional contributed capital pool related to the tax
effects of employee stock-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the additional contributed capital pool and the
consolidated statements of cash flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that were outstanding upon adoption of
SFAS No. 123-R.

Refer to Note 7 for further information about the company’s stock-based compensation plans and related accounting treatment in the current and
prior periods.

SFAS No. 151
On January 1, 2006, the company adopted SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs” (SFAS No. 151), which clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts
of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage. SFAS No. 151 requires that those items be recognized as current period charges. In
addition, the new standard requires that the allocation of fixed production overhead costs be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. The standard did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 158
On December 31, 2006, the company adopted SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (SFAS No. 158). The new standard requires companies to fully recognize
the overfunded or underfunded status of each of its defined benefit pension and other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans as an asset or
liability in the consolidated balance sheet. The asset or liability equals the difference between the fair value of the plan’s assets and its benefit
obligation. SFAS No. 158 has no impact on the amount of expense recognized in the consolidated statement of income.

Refer to Note 8 for further information regarding the impact of this new standard on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

SAB No. 108
On December 31, 2006, the company adopted Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, “Considering the
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 eliminates
the diversity in practice surrounding how public companies quantify financial statement misstatements and establishes an approach that

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

requires quantification and assessment of misstatements based on the effects of the misstatements on each of the company’s financial
statements and the related footnote disclosures. Adoption of this new standard did not impact the company’s financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. A summary of the company’s significant
accounting policies is included in Note 1. Certain of the company’s accounting policies are considered critical because these policies are the most
important to the depiction of the company’s financial statements and require significant, difficult or complex judgments by management, often
requiring the use of estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results that differ from management’s estimates
could have an unfavorable effect on the company’s results of operations and financial position. The company applies estimation methodologies
consistently from year to year. Other than changes required due to the issuance of new accounting pronouncements, there have been no
significant changes in the company’s application of its critical accounting policies during 2006. The company’s critical accounting policies have
been reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The following is a summary of accounting policies that management considers
critical to the company’s consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition and Related Provisions and Allowances
The company’s policy is to recognize revenues from product sales and services when earned. Specifically, revenue is recognized when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred (or services have been rendered), the price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is
reasonably assured. The shipping terms for the majority of the company’s revenue arrangements are FOB destination. The recognition of revenue
is delayed if there are significant post-delivery obligations, such as training, installation or customer acceptance.

The company enters into certain arrangements in which it commits to provide multiple elements (i.e., deliverables) to its customers. In
accordance principally with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” when the criteria are met,
total revenue for these arrangements is allocated among the deliverables based on the estimated fair values of the individual deliverables. Fair
values are generally determined based on sales of the individual deliverables to other third parties. It is not possible to determine how reported
amounts would change if different fair values were used.

Provisions for discounts, rebates to customers, and returns are provided for at the time the related sales are recorded, and are reflected as a
reduction of sales. These estimates are reviewed periodically and, if necessary, revised, with any revisions recognized immediately as
adjustments to sales.

Management periodically and systematically evaluates the collectibility of accounts receivable and determines the appropriate reserve for
doubtful accounts. In determining the amount of the reserve, management considers historical credit losses, the past due status of receivables,
payment history and other customer-specific information, and any other relevant factors or considerations. Because of the nature of the
company’s customer base and the company’s credit and collection policies and procedures, write-offs of accounts receivable have historically not
been significant (generally 2% or less of gross receivables).

The company also provides for the estimated costs that may be incurred under its warranty programs when the cost is both probable and
reasonably estimable, which is at the time the related revenue is recognized. The cost is determined based upon actual company experience for
the same or similar products as well as other relevant information. Estimates of future costs under the company’s warranty programs could
change based on developments in the future. Management is not able to estimate the probability or amount of any future developments that
could impact the reserves, but believes presently established reserves are adequate.

Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Under SFAS No. 123-R, stock compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, and the cost is recognized as
expense ratably over the vesting period. Determining the appropriate fair value model to use requires judgment. Determining the assumptions
that enter into the model is highly subjective and also requires judgment, including long-term projections regarding stock price volatility,
employee exercise, post-vesting termination, and pre-vesting forfeiture behaviors, interest rates and dividend yields. Management used the
guidance outlined in SAB No. 107 relating to SFAS No. 123-R in selecting a model and developing assumptions.

The company has historically used the Black-Scholes model for estimating the fair value of stock options in providing the pro forma fair value
method disclosures pursuant to SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123). After a review of alternatives, the

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

company decided to continue to use this model for estimating the fair value of stock options as it meets the fair value measurement objective of
SFAS No. 123-R.

Under SFAS No 123-R, the company’s expected volatility assumption is based on an equal weighting of the historical volatility of Baxter’s stock
and the implied volatility from traded options on Baxter’s stock. Management arrived at this expected volatility assumption based on a
consideration and weighting of the factors outlined in SAB No. 107. The expected life assumption is primarily based on historical employee
exercise patterns and employee post-vesting termination behavior. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield reflects historical experience as well as future expectations over the
expected term of the option. The forfeiture rate used to calculate compensation expense is primarily based on historical pre-vesting employee
forfeiture patterns. In finalizing its assumptions, management also reviewed comparable companies’ assumptions, as available in published
surveys and in publicly available financial filings.

The use of different assumptions would result in different amounts of stock compensation expense. Holding all other variables constant, the
indicated change in each of the assumptions below increases or decreases the fair value of an option (and hence, expense), as follows.

Assumption

Expected volatility
Expected life
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield

Change to
Assumption

Higher
Higher
Higher
Higher

Impact on Fair
Value of Option

Higher
Higher
Higher
Lower

The pre-vesting forfeitures assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeitures assumption would
not impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period. Different forfeitures assumptions would only impact the
timing of expense recognition over the vesting period. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on
new facts and circumstances.

The fair value of an option is particularly impacted by the expected volatility and expected life assumptions. In order to understand the impact of
changes in these assumptions on the fair value of an option, management performed sensitivity analyses. Holding all other variables constant, if
the expected volatility assumption used in valuing the stock options granted in 2006 was increased by 100 basis points (i.e., one percent), the
fair value of a stock option relating to one share of common stock would increase by approximately 2.4%, from $11.41 to $11.69. Holding all
other variables constant (including the expected volatility assumption), if the expected term assumption used in valuing the stock options
granted in 2006 was increased by one year, the fair value of a stock option relating to one share of common stock would increase by
approximately 8.0%, from $11.41 to $12.33.

Management is not able to estimate the probability of actual results differing from expected results, but believes the company’s assumptions are
appropriate, based upon the requirements of SFAS No. 123-R, the guidance included in SAB No. 107, and the company’s historical and expected
future experience.

Pension and Other Postemployment Benefit Plans
The company provides pension and other postemployment benefits to certain of its employees. These employee benefit expenses are reported in
the same line items in the consolidated income statement as the applicable employee’s compensation expense. The valuation of the funded
status and net benefit cost for the plans are calculated using actuarial assumptions. These assumptions are reviewed annually, and revised if
appropriate. The significant assumptions include the following:

• interest rates used to discount pension and OPEB plan liabilities;

• the long-term rate of return on pension plan assets;

• rates of increases in employee compensation (used in estimating liabilities);

• anticipated future healthcare costs (used in estimating the OPEB plan liability); and

• other assumptions involving demographic factors such as retirement, mortality and turnover (used in estimating liabilities).

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Selecting assumptions involves an analysis of both short-term and long-term historical trends and known economic and market conditions at the
time of the valuation (also called the measurement date). The use of different assumptions would result in different measures of the funded
status and net cost. Actual results in the future could differ from expected results. Management is not able to estimate the probability of actual
results differing from expected results, but believes its assumptions are appropriate.

The company’s key assumptions are listed in Note 8. The most critical assumptions relate to the plans covering U.S. and Puerto Rico employees,
because these plans are the most significant to the company’s consolidated financial statements.

Discount Rate Assumption
For the U.S. and Puerto Rico plans, the company used a discount rate of 6.0% to measure its benefit obligations under the pension and OPEB
plans at the measurement date (September 30, 2006). This assumption will be used in calculating the net periodic benefit cost for these plans for
2007. Management used a broad population of approximately 300 Aa-rated corporate bonds as of September 30, 2006 to determine the
discount rate assumption. All bonds were U.S. issues, with a minimum amount outstanding of $50 million. This population of bonds was
narrowed from a broader universe of over 550 Moody’s Aa rated, non-callable (or callable with make-whole provisions) bonds by eliminating the
top and bottom 10th percentile to adjust for any pricing anomalies, and then selecting the bonds Baxter would most likely select if it were to
actually annuitize its pension and OPEB liabilities. This portfolio of bonds was used to generate a yield curve and associated spot rate curve, to
discount the projected benefit payments for the U.S. and Puerto Rico plans. The discount rate is the single level rate that produces the same result
as the spot rate curve. The discount rate generated from this analysis was 6.0%.

For the company’s international plans, the discount rate is determined by reviewing country- and region-specific government and corporate bond
interest rates.

In order to understand the impact of changes in discount rates on pension and OPEB cost, management performs a sensitivity analysis. Holding
all other assumptions constant, for each 50 basis point (i.e., one-half of one percent) increase (decrease) in the discount rate, global pre-tax
pension and OPEB plan cost would decrease (increase) by approximately $34 million.

Return on Plan Assets Assumption
In measuring net periodic cost for 2006, the company used a long-term expected rate of return of 8.5% for the pension plans covering U.S. and
Puerto Rico employees. This is consistent with the assumption used in measuring the 2005 pension cost and will be used to measure net pension
cost for 2007. This assumption is not applicable to the company’s OPEB plans because they are not funded. Management establishes the long-
term asset return assumption based on a review of historical compound average asset returns, both company-specific and relating to the broad
market (based on the company’s asset allocation), as well as an analysis of current market information and future expectations. The current asset
return assumption is supported by historical market experience. In calculating net pension cost, the expected return on assets is applied to a
calculated value of plan assets, which recognizes changes in the fair value of plan assets in a systematic manner over five years. The difference
between this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is a component of the total net unrecognized gain or loss and is subject to
amortization in the future. In order to understand the impact of changes in the expected asset return assumption on net cost, management
performs a sensitivity analysis. Holding all other assumptions constant, for each 50 basis point increase (decrease) in the asset return
assumption, global pre-tax pension plan cost would decrease (increase) by approximately $12 million.

Other Assumptions
Published mortality tables are used in calculating pension and OPEB plan benefit obligations. At the end of 2005, management changed the
mortality tables it uses for certain of the company’s plans, and now uses tables that are based on more current experience. Specifically, for the
company’s U.S. and Puerto Rico plans, management changed from the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality table to the Retirement Plan 2000 table.
Management believes the Retirement Plan 2000 table better predicts future mortality experience for the participants included in Baxter’s plans.
The change in mortality tables increased net pension and OPEB plan cost by approximately $12 million in 2006.

The assumptions relating to employee compensation increases and future healthcare costs are based on historical experience, market trends,
and anticipated future management actions. Refer to Note 8 for information regarding the sensitivity of the OPEB plan obligation and the total of
the service and interest cost components of OPEB plan cost to potential changes in future healthcare costs.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Legal Contingencies
The company is involved in product liability, shareholder, patent, commercial, regulatory and other legal proceedings that arise in the normal
course of the company’s business. Refer to Note 10 for further information. The company records a liability when a loss is considered probable
and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range, and no amount within the range is a better
estimate, the lower end of the range is accrued. If a loss is not probable or a probable loss cannot be reasonably estimated, no liability is
recorded. Baxter has established reserves for certain of its legal matters. Management is not able to estimate the amount or range of any loss for
certain of the company’s legal contingencies for which there is no reserve or additional loss for matters already reserved. Management also
records any insurance recoveries that are probable of occurring. At December 31, 2006, total legal liabilities were $108 million and total
insurance receivables were $79 million.

Management’s loss estimates are developed in consultation with outside counsel and are based upon analyses of potential results. With respect
to the recording of any insurance recoveries, after completing the assessment and accounting for the company’s legal contingencies,
management separately and independently analyzes its insurance coverage and records any insurance recoveries that are probable of occurring
at the gross amount that is expected to be collected. In performing the assessment, management reviews available information, including
historical company-specific and market collection experience for similar claims, current facts and circumstances pertaining to the particular
insurance claim, the financial viability of the applicable insurance company or companies, and other relevant information.

While the liability of the company in connection with the claims cannot be estimated with any certainty, and although the resolution in any
reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a significant impact on the company’s results of operations for that period, the
outcome of these legal proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial position. While the
company believes that it has valid defenses in these matters, litigation is inherently uncertain, excessive verdicts do occur, and the company may
in the future incur material judgments or enter into material settlements of claims.

Inventories
The company values its inventories at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in, first-out method, or market value. Market value for raw
materials is based on replacement costs, and market value for work in process and finished goods is based on net realizable value. Management
reviews inventories on hand at least quarterly and records provisions for estimated excess, slow-moving and obsolete inventory, as well as
inventory with a carrying value in excess of net realizable value. The regular and systematic inventory valuation reviews include a current
assessment of future product demand, anticipated release of new products into the market (either by the company or its competitors), historical
experience and product expiration. Uncertain timing of product approvals, variability in product launch strategies, product recalls and variation in
product utilization all impact the estimates related to inventory valuation. Additional inventory provisions may be required if future demand or
market conditions are less favorable than the company has estimated. Management is not able to estimate the probability of actual results
differing from expected results, but believes its estimates are appropriate.

Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowances and Reserves for Uncertain Tax Positions
The company maintains valuation allowances unless it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will be realized.
Changes in valuation allowances are included in the company’s tax provision in the period of change. In determining whether a valuation
allowance is warranted, management evaluates factors such as prior earnings history, expected future earnings, carryback and carryforward
periods, and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. The realizability assessments made
at a given balance sheet date are subject to change in the future, particularly if earnings of a particular subsidiary are significantly higher or lower
than expected, or if management takes operational or tax planning actions that could impact the future taxable earnings of a subsidiary.

In the normal course of business, the company is audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, and is periodically challenged regarding the
amount of taxes due. These challenges relate to the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax
jurisdictions. Management believes the company’s tax positions comply with applicable tax law and the company intends to defend its positions.
In evaluating the exposure associated with various tax filing positions, the company records reserves for uncertain tax positions, based upon the
technical support for the positions, the company’s past audit experience with similar situations, and potential interest and penalties related to
the matters. Management believes these reserves represent the best estimate of the amount that the company will ultimately be required to pay
to settle the matters. The company’s effective tax rate in a given period could be impacted if, upon final resolution with taxing authorities, the
company prevailed in positions for which reserves have been established, or was required to pay amounts in excess of established reserves.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Impairment of Assets
Goodwill is subject to impairment reviews annually, and whenever indicators of impairment exist. Intangible assets other than goodwill and other
long-lived assets (such as fixed assets) are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Refer to Note 1 for further information. The company’s impairment reviews are based on a cash flow
approach that requires significant management judgment with respect to future volume, revenue and expense growth rates, changes in working
capital use, foreign currency exchange rates, the selection of an appropriate discount rate, asset groupings, and other assumptions and
estimates. The estimates and assumptions used are consistent with the company’s business plans. The use of alternative estimates and
assumptions could increase or decrease the estimated fair values of the assets, and potentially result in different impacts to the company’s
results of operations. Actual results may differ from management’s estimates.

Hedging Activities
As further discussed in Note 6 and in the Financial Instrument Market Risk section below, the company uses derivative instruments to hedge
certain risks. As Baxter operates on a global basis, there is a risk to earnings associated with foreign exchange relating to the company’s firm
commitments and forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Compliance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended, and the company’s hedging policies require management to make judgments regarding the
probability of anticipated hedged transactions. In making these estimates and assessments of probability, management analyzes historical
trends and expected future cash flows and plans. The estimates and assumptions used are consistent with the company’s business plans. If
management were to make different assessments of probability or make the assessments during a different fiscal period, the company’s results
of operations for a given period would be different.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flows from Operations
Cash flows from operations increased in both 2006 and 2005. The increase in cash flows in 2006 was primarily due to higher earnings (before
non-cash items), improved working capital management, lower payments related to restructuring programs, and lower contributions to the
company’s pension plans. Partially offsetting the impact of these increases was the January 1, 2006 adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, which changes
the presentation of realized excess tax benefits principally associated with stock option exercises in the statement of cash flows. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, such realized tax benefits were required to be presented as an inflow within the operating section of the statement.
Under SFAS No. 123-R, such realized tax benefits are presented as an inflow within the financing section of the statement. Realized excess tax
benefits presented as operating cash inflows in 2005 and 2004 were $22 million and $16 million, respectively.

The increase in cash flows in 2005 was primarily due to higher earnings (before non-cash items), improved working capital management, lower
payments related to restructuring programs, and cash receipts relating to the settlement of mirror cross-currency swaps, partially offset by higher
contributions to the company’s pension plans.

Accounts Receivable
Cash flows relating to accounts receivable decreased in 2006. However, days sales outstanding decreased from 55.1 days at December 31, 2005
to 52.9 days at December 31, 2006, principally due to continued improvement in the collection of international receivables. Proceeds from the
factoring of receivables increased, while net cash outflows relating to the company’s securitization arrangements totaled $123 million (as
detailed in Note 6) during 2006.

Cash flows relating to accounts receivable increased during 2005 as the company continued to increase its focus on working capital efficiency,
resulting in improved accounts receivable collections. Days sales outstanding were relatively flat, declining from 55.3 days at December 31, 2004
to 55.1 days at December 31, 2005. Proceeds from the factoring of receivables increased, while net cash outflows relating to the company’s
securitization arrangements totaled $111 million (as detailed in Note 6) during 2005.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Inventories
The following is a summary of inventories at December 31, 2006 and 2005, as well as inventory turns at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, by
segment. Inventory turns are calculated as the most recent quarter’s cost of goods sold annualized, divided by the inventory balance at the end of
the period. The calculations exclude the above-mentioned charges and costs relating to the Medication Delivery segment of $94 million
(consisting of a charge of $76 million and other costs of $18 million) in 2006 and $126 million in 2005, respectively, and charges relating to the
Renal segment of $50 million in 2005, which are classified in cost of goods sold in the consolidated income statements.

(in millions, except inventory turn data)

BioScience
Medication Delivery
Renal

Total company

Inventories

2006

$1,138
719
209

$2,066

2005

$1,102
624
199

$1,925

2006

1.96
3.24
4.72

2.68

Inventory turns
2005

1.78
3.01
3.98

2.61

2004

1.57
4.40
4.19

2.66

Inventories increased $141 million during 2006, primarily due to an increase in infusion pump inventory related to the above-mentioned sales
hold on COLLEAGUE pumps, as well as an increase in plasma inventories. The improvement in inventory turns was driven by disciplined working
capital management across the company’s businesses.

Other
Other cash flows increased from 2005 to 2006. Contributing to the increase in cash flows were significantly reduced contributions to the
company’s pension plans in 2006. In 2006, the company contributed $73 million to its pension plans, compared to $574 million in the prior year.
In addition, cash payments related to the company’s restructuring programs declined from $117 million in 2005 to $42 million in 2006, as the
company completes its restructuring initiatives. Partially offsetting the increased cash flows was a $53 million cash inflow in 2005 related to the
settlement of certain mirror cross-currency swaps. There were no settlements of cross-currency swaps in 2006. Refer to the net investment hedges
section below for further information regarding these swaps.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures totaled $526 million in 2006, $444 million in 2005 and $558 million in 2004. The company continues to invest in various
multi-year capital projects across its three segments, including ongoing projects to upgrade facilities or increase manufacturing capacity for drug
delivery, plasma-based (including antibody therapy) and other products. One of the significant projects includes the expansion of the company’s
manufacturing facility in Bloomington, Indiana. Utilizing this facility, the Medication Delivery segment collaborates with pharmaceutical
companies in the manufacturing of pre-filled vials and syringes. One of the significant plasma-based products projects includes the company’s
new plasma fractionation facility in Los Angeles, California. The company also plans to make a significant investment to expand production
capacity at its four manufacturing facilities in China to support sales growth of the Medication Delivery and Renal segments. The reduction in
capital expenditures from 2004 to 2005 was due to the completion of certain long-term projects.

The company makes investments in capital expenditures at a level sufficient to support the strategic and operating needs of the businesses, and
continues to improve capital allocation discipline in making investments to enhance long-term growth. The company expects to spend
approximately $700 million in capital expenditures in 2007.

Acquisitions and Investments in and Advances to Affiliates
Net cash outflows relating to acquisitions and investments in and advances to affiliates were $5 million in 2006, $47 million in 2005 and
$20 million in 2004. The 2005 outflows principally related to the acquisition of certain assets of a distributor of PD supplies, which are included in
the Renal segment, as well as additional payments relating to a prior year acquisition included in the BioScience segment. The 2004 outflows
included additional payments relating to a prior year BioScience segment acquisition.

Divestitures and Other
Net cash inflows relating to divestitures and other activities were $189 million in 2006, $124 million in 2005 and $26 million in 2004. The 2006
total principally related to cash proceeds related to asset dispositions and cash collections on retained interests associated with securitization
arrangements. The net cash inflows in 2005 primarily included cash collections on retained interests associated with securitization arrangements

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

and proceeds from the divestiture of the RTS business in Taiwan. The net cash inflows in 2004 primarily related to the sale of a building and the
return of collateral.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Debt Issuances, Net of Payments of Obligations
Debt issuances, net of payments of obligations, totaled to net outflows of $543 million in 2006, $1.3 billion in 2005 and $378 million in 2004.

In August 2006, the company issued $600 million of term debt, maturing in September 2016 and bearing a 5.9% coupon rate. The net proceeds
are being used for the repayment of outstanding indebtedness and general corporate purposes, which may include acquisitions, additions to
working capital, capital expenditures and investments in the company’s subsidiaries. Using the cash proceeds from the settlement of the equity
units purchase contracts in February 2006 (further discussed below), the company paid down maturing debt during 2006.

Included in the outflows in 2005 were payments of $432 million to settle certain of the company’s cross-currency swap agreements. Refer to
further discussion below.

In addition to increased payments in 2005 to settle the swap agreements mentioned above, net payments increased significantly during 2005
primarily due to activities related to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act). As discussed above and in Note 9, in 2005 the company
repatriated approximately $2.1 billion of foreign earnings under the Act. Repatriation cash proceeds have been reinvested in the company’s
domestic operations in accordance with the legislation. The majority of the proceeds were used in 2005 to reduce the company’s debt and
contribute to its pension plans. In conjunction with the repatriation, the company issued new debt and paid down existing debt, resulting in a net
reduction in the company’s total debt outstanding of almost $1 billion. In October 2005, Baxter Finco B.V., an indirectly wholly-owned finance
subsidiary of Baxter International Inc., issued $500 million of 4.75% five-year senior unsecured notes, generating net proceeds of $496 million.
The notes, which are irrevocably, fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Baxter International Inc., are redeemable, in whole or in part, at Baxter
Finco B.V.’s option, subject to a make-whole premium. The indenture includes certain covenants, including restrictions relating to the company’s
creation of secured debt, transfers of principal facilities, and sale and leaseback transactions. In November 2005, the company drew $300 million
under an existing European credit facility. Principally with these cash proceeds, along with existing off-shore cash, the company retired $1 billion
of the 3.6% senior notes associated with the company’s December 2002 equity unit offering and redeemed approximately $500 million of 5.25%
notes, which were due in 2007.

Other Financing Activities
Cash dividend payments totaled $364 million in 2006, and were funded with cash generated from operations. In November 2006, the board of
directors declared an annual dividend on the company’s common stock of $0.582 per share. The dividend, which was paid on January 5, 2007 to
shareholders of record as of December 8, 2006, was a continuation of the prior annual rate. Beginning in 2007, the company will convert to a
quarterly, rather than annual, dividend and increase its dividend. The first quarterly dividend payment is payable on April 2, 2007 to shareholders
of record as of March 10, 2007.

Cash proceeds and realized excess tax benefits from stock issued under employee stock plans increased by $96 million in 2006 and decreased
by $5 million in 2005. The increase in 2006 was primarily due to an increase in stock option exercises, as well as a higher average exercise price.
The increase was also due to the changed presentation of realized excess tax benefits under SFAS No. 123-R, as further discussed above.
Realized excess tax benefits of $29 million were presented within the financing section of the statement of cash flows in 2006. Cash received
relating to employee stock purchase plans declined in 2005, partially due to a change in the plan’s design in that year.

In February 2006, the company issued approximately 35 million shares of common stock for $1.25 billion in conjunction with the settlement of
the purchase contracts included in the company’s equity units, which were issued in December 2002. The company has been using these
proceeds to pay down maturing debt, for stock repurchases and for other general corporate purposes. Refer to Note 5 for further information.

As authorized by the board of directors, from time to time the company repurchases its stock on the open market in an effort to optimize its capital
structure depending upon the company’s cash flows, net debt level and current market conditions. As of December 31, 2005, $243 million was
available under a stock purchase program previously authorized by the board of directors. In February 2006, the board of directors authorized the
repurchase of an additional $1.5 billion of the company’s common stock. During 2006, the company repurchased 18 million shares for
$737 million under these stock repurchase programs. At December 31, 2006, $1.0 billion remained available under the February 2006
authorization. No open-market repurchases were made in 2005 or 2004. In 2004, stock repurchases totaled $18 million, all of which were from
Shared Investment Plan participants in private transactions. Refer to Note 5 for information regarding the Shared Investment Plan.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Credit Facilities, Access to Capital, Credit Ratings and Net Investment Hedges
Credit Facilities
The company had $2.5 billion of cash and equivalents at December 31, 2006. The company has two primary revolving credit facilities, which
totaled approximately $2.2 billion at December 31, 2006. In December 2006, the company replaced its existing $640 million and $800 million
revolving credit facilities with a $1.5 billion five-year revolving credit facility. The second facility, which is denominated in Euros, totals
approximately $660 million and matures in January 2008. These facilities enable the company to borrow funds in U.S. Dollars, Euros, Japanese
Yen or Swiss Francs on an unsecured basis at variable interest rates and contain various covenants, including a maximum net-debt-to-capital ratio
and, solely with respect to the Euro-denominated facility, a minimum interest coverage ratio. At December 31, 2006, the company was in
compliance with the financial covenants in these agreements. Borrowings outstanding under these facilities totaled $139 million at December 31,
2006. There were no other borrowings outstanding under the company’s primary credit facilities at December 31, 2006. The company also
maintains certain other credit arrangements, as described in Note 5.

The company’s net-debt-to-capital ratio was 4.8% and 36.7% at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The net-debt-to-capital ratio, which
is not a measure defined by GAAP, is calculated as net debt (short-term and long-term debt and capital lease obligations, less cash and cash
equivalents) divided by capital (the total of net debt and shareholders’ equity). The significant decline in the net-debt-to-capital ratio from 2005 to
2006 was primarily due to the settlement of the purchase contracts component of the equity units in February 2006. As further discussed in
Note 5, a portion of the $1.25 billion cash proceeds from the settlement of the purchase contracts (and issuance of common stock) was used to
pay down maturing debt in 2006.

Access to Capital
The company intends to fund short-term and long-term obligations as they mature through cash on hand, future cash flows from operations, or by
issuing additional debt or common stock. The company’s ability to generate cash flows from operations, issue debt, enter into other financing
arrangements and attract long-term capital on acceptable terms could be adversely affected if there is a material decline in the demand for the
company’s products, deterioration in the company’s key financial ratios or credit ratings, or other significantly unfavorable changes in conditions.
The company believes it has sufficient financial flexibility in the future to issue debt, enter into other financing arrangements, and attract long-
term capital on acceptable terms to support the company’s growth objectives.

Credit Ratings
The company’s credit ratings at December 31, 2006 were as follows.

Ratings

Senior debt
Short-term debt

Outlook

Standard & Poor’s

A
A1
Positive

Fitch

A-
F2
Positive

Moody’s

Baa1
P2
Stable

Certain of the company’s credit ratings and outlooks were upgraded during 2006. The company’s credit ratings on senior debt were raised from A-
to A by Standard & Poor’s and BBB+ to A- by Fitch, and the ratings on short-term debt were raised from A2 to A1 by Standard & Poor’s. In addition,
Standard & Poor’s favorably changed its outlook on Baxter from Stable to Positive during 2006.

If Baxter’s credit ratings or outlooks were to be downgraded, the company’s financing costs related to its credit arrangements and any future debt
issuances could be unfavorably impacted. However, any future credit rating downgrade or change in outlook would not affect the company’s
ability to draw on its credit facilities, and would not result in an acceleration of the scheduled maturities of any of the company’s outstanding
debt. One of the company’s foreign currency and interest rate derivative agreements includes a provision whereby the counterparty financial
institution could cause the arrangement to be terminated if Baxter’s credit rating on its senior unsecured debt declined to BBB- or Baa3 (i.e., a
two-rating or four-rating downgrade, depending upon the rating agency). As of December 31, 2006, the mark-to-market liability balance of
outstanding cross-currency swaps subject to this agreement totaled approximately $400 million. In addition, if Baxter’s credit ratings on senior
unsecured debt declined to BBB- or Baa3, the company would no longer be able to securitize new receivables under one of its foreign
securitization arrangements. This arrangement also requires that the company post cash collateral in the event of a specified unfavorable change
in credit rating. The maximum potential cash collateral, which was not required as of December 31, 2006, was de minimus. However, any
downgrade of credit ratings would not impact previously securitized receivables.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Net Investment Hedges
The company historically hedged the net assets of certain of its foreign operations using a combination of foreign currency denominated debt and
cross-currency swaps. The cross-currency swaps have served as effective hedges for accounting purposes and have reduced volatility in the
company’s shareholders’ equity balance and net-debt-to-capital ratio.

In 2004, the company reevaluated its net investment hedge strategy and decided to reduce the use of these instruments as a risk management
tool. In order to reduce financial risk and uncertainty through the maturity (or cash settlement) dates of the cross-currency swaps, the company
executed offsetting, or mirror, cross-currency swaps relating to over half of the existing portfolio. As of the date of execution, these mirror swaps
effectively fixed the net amount that the company will ultimately pay to settle the cross-currency swap agreements subject to this strategy. The
mirror swaps will be settled when the offsetting existing swaps are settled. Approximately $335 million, or 46%, of the total swaps liability of
$736 million as of December 31, 2006 has been fixed by the mirror swaps.

There were no settlements of cross-currency swaps or mirror swaps in 2006. As also discussed above, during 2005 the company settled certain
cross-currency swaps agreements (and related mirror swaps, as applicable). In accordance with SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” when the cross-currency swaps are settled, the cash flows are reported within the financing
section of the consolidated statement of cash flows. When the mirror swaps are settled, the cash flows are reporting in the operating section of the
consolidated statement of cash flows. Of the $379 million of net settlement payments in 2005, $432 million of cash outflows were included in the
financing section and $53 million of cash inflows were included in the operating section. The entire $40 million in settlement payments in 2004
were included in the financing section of the statement of cash flows.

Refer to Note 6 for additional discussion of the cross-currency swaps and related mirror swaps, including a summary of the instruments
outstanding at December 31, 2006.

Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2006, the company has contractual obligations (excluding accounts payable, accrued liabilities, current deferred income
taxes and contingent liabilities) payable or maturing in the following periods.

(in millions)

Short-term debt
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, including current maturities
Interest on short- and long-term debt and capital lease obligations1
Operating leases
Other long-term liabilities2
Purchase obligations3
Contractual obligations4

Total

57
2,774
923
618
1,713
844

$6,929

Less than
one year

One to
three years

Three to
five years

More than
five years

$ 57
177
130
140
—
434

$938

—
570
188
210
922
218

—
647
174
156
113
86

—
1,380
431
112
678
106

$2,108

$1,176

$2,707

1 Interest payments on debt and capital lease obligations are calculated for future periods using interest rates in effect at the end of 2006.
Projected interest payments include the related effects of interest rate and cross-currency swap agreements. Certain of these projected interest
payments may differ in the future based on changes in floating interest rates, foreign currency fluctuations, or other factors or events. The
projected interest payments only pertain to obligations and agreements outstanding at December 31, 2006. Interest payments associated with
any future obligations and agreements entered into upon maturity or termination of existing obligations and agreements are not included in the
table above. Refer to Notes 5 and 6 for further discussion regarding the company’s debt instruments and related interest rate and cross-currency
swap agreements outstanding at December 31, 2006.

2 The primary components of Other Long-Term Liabilities in the company’s consolidated balance sheet are liabilities relating to pension and OPEB
plans, cross-currency swaps, and litigation. The company projected the timing of the future cash payments based on contractual maturity dates
(where applicable), and estimates of the timing of payments (for liabilities with no contractual maturity dates).

The company contributed $73 million and $574 million to its pension plans during 2006 and 2005, respectively. Most of the company’s plans
are funded. The timing of funding in the future is uncertain, and is dependent on future movements in interest rates and investment returns,
changes in laws and regulations, and other variables. Refer to the discussion below regarding the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Therefore, the
table above excludes pension plan cash outflows. The pension plan balance included in other long-term liabilities (and excluded from the table
above) totaled $524 million at December 31, 2006.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

3 Includes the company’s significant contractual unconditional purchase obligations. For cancelable agreements, includes any penalty due upon
cancellation. These commitments do not exceed the company’s projected requirements and are in the normal course of business. Examples
include firm commitments for raw material purchases, utility agreements and service contracts.

4 Excludes any contingent obligations. Refer to discussion of contingent obligations below.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Baxter periodically enters into off-balance sheet arrangements where economical and consistent with the company’s business strategy. Certain
contingencies arise in the normal course of business, and are not recorded in the consolidated balance sheet in accordance with GAAP (such as
contingent joint development and commercialization arrangement payments). Also, upon resolution of uncertainties, the company may incur
charges in excess of presently established liabilities for certain matters (such as contractual indemnifications). The following is a summary of
significant off-balance sheet arrangements and contingencies.

Receivable Securitizations
Where economical, the company securitizes an undivided interest in certain pools of receivables. Refer to Note 6 for a description of these
arrangements. The securitization arrangements include limited recourse provisions, which are not material to the consolidated financial
statements. Neither the buyers of the receivables nor the investors in these transactions have recourse to assets other than the transferred
receivables.

The company generally retains a subordinated interest in each securitized portfolio. The subordinated interests retained in the transferred
receivables are carried as assets in Baxter’s consolidated balance sheet, and totaled $95 million at December 31, 2006. Credit losses on these
retained interests have historically been immaterial as a result of the securitized assets needing to meet certain eligibility criteria, as further
discussed in Note 6.

Shared Investment Plan
In order to align management and shareholder interests, in 1999 the company sold shares of Baxter stock to senior managers. As part of this
shared investment plan, the company guaranteed repayment of eligible participants’ third-party loans. Baxter’s maximum potential obligation
relating to the guarantee was $39 million as of December 31, 2006. Refer to Note 5 for further information.

Joint Development and Commercialization Arrangements
In the normal course of business, Baxter enters into joint development and commercialization arrangements with third parties, sometimes with
investees of the company. The arrangements vary, but generally provide that Baxter will receive certain rights to manufacture, market or distribute
a specified technology or product under development by the third party in exchange for payments by Baxter. At December 31, 2006, the unfunded
milestone payments under these arrangements totaled approximately $450 million. Based on the company’s projections, any contingent
payments made in the future will be more than offset over time by the estimated net future cash flows relating to the rights acquired for those
payments. Refer to Note 5 for further information.

Credit Rating Requirements
Certain specified rating agency downgrades, if they occur in the future, could require the company to immediately settle certain financial
instruments, or could cause the company to no longer be able to securitize new receivables or require the company to post collateral under one of
its foreign securitization arrangements. Refer to the Credit Ratings section above for further information.

Indemnifications
During the normal course of business, Baxter makes certain indemnities, commitments and guarantees pursuant to which the company may be
required to make payments related to specific transactions. These include: (i) intellectual property indemnities to customers in connection with
the use, sales or license of products and services; (ii) indemnities to customers in connection with losses incurred while performing services on
their premises; (iii) indemnities to vendors and service providers pertaining to claims based on negligence or willful misconduct; and
(iv) indemnities involving the representations and warranties in certain contracts. In addition, under Baxter’s Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation, and consistent with Delaware General Corporation Law, the company has agreed to indemnify its directors and officers for
certain losses and expenses upon the occurrence of certain prescribed events. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees
do not provide for any limitation on the maximum potential for future payments that the company could be obligated to make. To help address
these risks, the company maintains various insurance coverages. Based on historical experience and evaluation of the agreements, the company
does not believe that it would be appropriate to record any associated liabilities.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Legal Contingencies
Refer to Note 10 for a discussion of the company’s legal contingencies. Upon resolution of any of these uncertainties, the company may incur
charges in excess of presently established liabilities. While the liability of the company in connection with the claims cannot be estimated with
any certainty, and although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a significant impact on the
company’s results of operations for that period, the outcome of these legal proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
company’s consolidated financial position. While the company believes that it has valid defenses in these matters, litigation is inherently
uncertain, excessive verdicts do occur, and the company may in the future incur material judgments or enter into material settlements of claims.

Funding of Pension and OPEB Plans
The company’s funding policy for its pension plans is to contribute amounts sufficient to meet legal funding requirements, plus any additional
amounts that management may determine to be appropriate considering the funded status of the plans, tax deductibility, the cash flows
generated by the company, and other factors. Refer to Note 8 for further information, including a summary of the plans’ funded status. Currently,
the company is not legally obligated to fund its principal plans in the United States and Puerto Rico in 2007. The company continually reassesses
the amount and timing of any discretionary contributions. The company expects to have net cash outflows relating to its OPEB plan of
approximately $25 million in 2007.

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) was signed into law on August 17, 2006. The company is in the process of analyzing the legislation and
the potential impact on the company’s future funding to the U.S. plan. The U.S. Treasury Department is in the process of developing
implementation guidance for the PPA. It is likely that the PPA will accelerate minimum funding requirements in the future. However, the
company does not expect that the legislation will have a significant impact on the company’s required cash contributions over the next few years
because of the company’s recent contributions to its U.S. qualified plans.

Insurance Coverage
In view of business conditions in the insurance industry, the company’s liability insurance coverage, including product liability insurance, with
respect to insured occurrences after April 30, 2003, is significantly less than the coverage available for insured occurrences prior to that date.
These reductions in insurance coverage available to the company reflect current trends in the liability insurance area generally, and are not
unique to the company. The company will continue to evaluate coverage levels and self-insured retentions in the future. It is likely that the
company will discontinue its practice of purchasing product liability insurance. The company will reevaluate this decision annually, as market
conditions may change. The company’s net income and cash flows may be adversely affected in the future as a result of losses sustained.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT MARKET RISK

The company operates on a global basis, and is exposed to the risk that its earnings, cash flows and shareholders’ equity could be adversely
impacted by fluctuations in foreign exchange and interest rates. The company’s hedging policy attempts to manage these risks to an acceptable
level based on management’s judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and costs. Refer to Note 6 for further information
regarding the company’s financial instruments and hedging strategies.

Currency Risk
The company is primarily exposed to foreign exchange risk with respect to firm commitments, forecasted transactions and net assets
denominated in the Euro, Japanese Yen, British Pound and Swiss Franc. The company manages its foreign currency exposures on a consolidated
basis, which allows the company to net exposures and take advantage of any natural offsets. In addition, the company uses derivative and
nonderivative financial instruments to further reduce the net exposure to foreign exchange. Gains and losses on the hedging instruments offset
losses and gains on the hedged transactions and reduce earnings and shareholders’ equity volatility relating to foreign exchange.

The company uses forward and option contracts to hedge the foreign exchange risk to earnings relating to firm commitments and forecasted
transactions denominated in foreign currencies. The company enters into derivative instruments to hedge certain intercompany and third party
receivables, payables and debt denominated in foreign currencies. The company has also historically hedged certain of its net investments in
international affiliates, using a combination of debt denominated in foreign currencies and cross-currency swap agreements.

As part of its risk management program, the company performs sensitivity analyses to assess potential changes in the fair value of its foreign
exchange instruments relating to hypothetical and reasonably possible near-term movements in foreign exchange rates.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Foreign exchange forward and option contracts A sensitivity analysis of changes in the fair value of foreign exchange forward and option
contracts outstanding at December 31, 2006, while not predictive in nature, indicated that if the U.S. Dollar uniformly fluctuated unfavorably by
10% against all currencies, on a net-of-tax basis, the net liability balance of $22 million with respect to those contracts would increase by
$61 million. A similar analysis performed with respect to forward and option contracts outstanding at December 31, 2005 indicated that, on a net-
of-tax basis, the net liability balance of $19 million would increase by $63 million.

Cross-currency swap agreements With respect to the company’s cross-currency swap agreements (including the outstanding mirror swaps), if
the U.S. Dollar uniformly weakened by 10%, on a net-of-tax basis, the net liability balance of $466 million with respect to those contracts
outstanding at December 31, 2006 would increase by $92 million. A similar analysis performed with respect to the cross-currency swap
agreements outstanding at December 31, 2005 indicated that, on a net-of-tax basis, the net liability balance of $407 million would increase by
$85 million. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of cross-currency swap agreements designated as hedges of the net assets of foreign
operations relating to changes in spot currency exchange rates is offset by the change in the value of the hedged net assets relating to changes in
spot currency exchange rates. With respect to the portion of the cross-currency swap portfolio that is no longer designated as a net investment
hedge, but is fixed via the mirror swaps, as discussed above, as the fair value of this fixed portion of the portfolio decreases, the fair value of the
mirror swaps increases by an approximately offsetting amount, and vice versa.

The sensitivity analysis model recalculates the fair value of the foreign currency forward, option and cross-currency swap contracts outstanding at
December 31 of each year by replacing the actual exchange rates at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, with exchange rates that are 10%
unfavorable to the actual exchange rates for each applicable currency. All other factors are held constant. These sensitivity analyses disregard the
possibility that currency exchange rates can move in opposite directions and that gains from one currency may or may not be offset by losses from
another currency. The analyses also disregard the offsetting change in value of the underlying hedged transactions and balances.

Interest Rate and Other Risks
The company is also exposed to the risk that its earnings and cash flows could be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates. The
company’s policy is to manage interest costs using a mix of fixed- and floating-rate debt that management believes is appropriate. To manage this
mix in a cost efficient manner, the company periodically enters into interest rate swaps, in which the company agrees to exchange, at specified
intervals, the difference between fixed and floating interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional amount. The company
also uses forward-starting interest rate swaps and treasury rate locks to hedge the risk to earnings associated with fluctuations in interest rates
relating to anticipated issuances of term debt.

As part of its risk management program, the company performs sensitivity analyses to assess potential gains and losses in earnings relating to
hypothetical movements in interest rates. A 26 basis-point increase in interest rates (approximately 10% of the company’s weighted-average interest
rate during 2006) affecting the company’s financial instruments, including debt obligations and related derivatives, would have an immaterial effect
on the company’s 2006 and 2005 earnings and on the fair value of the company’s fixed-rate debt as of the end of each fiscal year.

As discussed in Note 6, the fair values of the company’s long-term litigation liabilities and related insurance receivables were computed by
discounting the expected cash flows based on currently available information. A 10% movement in the assumed discount rate would have an
immaterial effect on the fair values of those assets and liabilities.

With respect to the company’s investments in affiliates, management believes any reasonably possible near-term losses in earnings, cash flows
and fair values would not be material to the company’s consolidated financial position.

COLLEAGUE MATTER

The company began to hold shipments of COLLEAGUE infusion pumps in July 2005, and continues to hold shipments of new pumps in the United
States. On October 12, 2005 the United States filed a complaint in the U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Illinois to effect the seizure of
approximately 6,000 Baxter-owned COLLEAGUE pumps, as well as 850 SYNDEO PCA syringe pumps that were on hold in Northern Illinois.
Customer-owned pumps were not affected. On June 29, 2006, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Baxter, entered
into a Consent Decree for Condemnation and Permanent Injunction with the United States to resolve this seizure litigation. The Consent Decree
outlines the steps the company must take to resume sales of new pumps in the United States. The steps include obtaining FDA approval of the
company’s plan to resolve issues with the pumps currently in use in the United States, third-party expert reviews of COLLEAGUE and SYNDEO
operations, and other measures to ensure compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulations. In December 2006, Baxter Healthcare

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

Corporation received conditional approval from the FDA for the company’s plan to resolve issues with the COLLEAGUE pumps currently in use in
the United States. On February 27, 2007, Baxter Healthcare Corporation received clearance from the FDA on its COLLEAGUE infusion pump 510(k)
pre-market notification. The company is preparing to modify pumps currently in the United States and will soon submit manufacturing and service
documentation to the FDA in advance of deploying upgrades to these COLLEAGUE infusion pumps.

While the company is taking the steps necessary for compliance with the terms of the Consent Decree as the steps are required, there can be no
assurance that additional costs or penalties will not be incurred or that sales of disposables used with COLLEAGUE pumps or any other products
may not be adversely affected. Please refer to “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for
additional discussion of COLLEAGUE matters.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

SFAS Nos. 155 and 156
During the first quarter of 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 133 and 140” (SFAS No. 155) and SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Instruments — an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 140” (SFAS No. 156). SFAS No. 155 requires that interests in securitized financial assets be evaluated to determine whether they
contain embedded derivatives, and permits the accounting for any such hybrid financial instruments as single financial instruments at fair value
with changes in fair value recognized directly in earnings. SFAS No. 156 specifies that servicing assets or liabilities recognized upon the sale of
financial assets must be initially measured at fair value, and subsequently either measured at fair value or amortized in proportion to and over the
period of estimated net servicing income or loss. The new standards, which become effective on January 1, 2007, are not expected to have a
material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

FIN No. 48
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB
Statement 109” (FIN No. 48), which will be effective for the company on January 1, 2007. FIN No. 48 prescribes a two-step process for the financial
statement measurement and recognition of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step involves the determination of
whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. The second
step requires that any tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold be measured and recognized in the financial
statements at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN No. 48 also
provides guidance on the accounting for related interest and penalties, financial statement classification and disclosure. The company has
substantially completed its review of its tax positions and does not expect that there will be a material impact on the company’s opening balance
of retained earnings or its statement of financial position.

SFAS No. 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157), which clarifies the definition of fair value
whenever another standard requires or permits assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. Specifically, the standard clarifies that fair value
should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. SFAS No. 157 does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. The
standard also requires expanded financial statement disclosures about fair value measurements, including disclosure of the methods used and
the effect on earnings. The company is in the process of analyzing this new standard, which will be effective for the company on January 1, 2008.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This annual report includes forward-looking statements, including accounting estimates and assumptions, litigation outcomes, statements with
respect to infusion pumps and other regulatory matters, expectations with respect to restructuring activities, sales and pricing forecasts, future
costs relating to the discontinuation of the manufacturing of HD instruments, developments with respect to credit and credit ratings, including the
adequacy of credit facilities, estimates of liabilities, statements regarding tax provisions, deferred tax assets and future pension plan costs,
future capital and R&D expenditures, the sufficiency of the company’s financial flexibility and the adequacy of reserves, expectations with respect
to the closing of the sale of the Transfusion Therapies business, the effective income tax rate in 2007, and the adoption of FIN No. 48 and
SFAS Nos. 155 and 156, and all other statements that do not relate to historical facts. The statements are based on assumptions about many
important factors, including assumptions concerning:

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N a n d A N A LYS I S

• demand for and market acceptance risks for new and existing products, such as ADVATE and IVIG, and other therapies;

• the company’s ability to identify growth opportunities for existing products and to exit low margin businesses or products;

• the balance between supply and demand with respect to the market for plasma protein products;

• reimbursement policies of government agencies and private payers;

• product quality or patient safety issues, leading to product recalls, withdrawals, launch delays, litigation, or declining sales;

• future actions of regulatory bodies and other government authorities, including any sanctions available under the Consent Decree entered

with the FDA concerning the COLLEAGUE and SYNDEO pumps;

• product development risks, including satisfactory clinical performance, the ability to manufacture at appropriate scale, and the general

unpredictability associated with the product development cycle;

• the ability to enforce the company’s patent rights;

• patents of third parties preventing or restricting the company’s manufacture, sale or use of affected products or technology;

• the impact of geographic and product mix on the company’s sales;

• the impact of competitive products and pricing, including generic competition, drug reimportation and disruptive technologies;

• inventory reductions or fluctuations in buying patterns by wholesalers or distributors;

• the availability of acceptable raw materials and component supply;

• global regulatory, trade and tax policies;

• foreign currency fluctuations;

• change in credit agency ratings;

• failure to satisfy closing conditions related to the sale of the Transfusion Therapies business; and

• other factors identified elsewhere in this report and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those factors
described under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, all of which are
available on the company’s website.

Actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to update its
forward-looking statements.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y f o r C O N S O L I DAT E D
F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

Management is responsible for the preparation of the company’s consolidated financial statements and related information appearing in this
report. Management believes that the consolidated financial statements fairly reflect the form and substance of transactions and that the
financial statements reasonably present the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management has also included in the company’s consolidated financial statements
amounts that are based on estimates and judgments, which it believes are reasonable under the circumstances.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the company’s consolidated financial statements in
accordance with the standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and provides an opinion on whether the
consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the
company.

M A N AG E M E N T ’ S R E P O RT o n I N T E R N A L C O N T RO L
OV E R F I N A N C I A L R E P O RT I N G

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
under the supervision of the principal executive and financial officers, and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We performed an assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making
this assessment, management used the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organi-
zations of the Treadway Commission.

Based on that assessment under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, management concluded that the company’s internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006. Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

Robert L. Parkinson, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

Robert M. Davis
Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

R E P O RT o f

I N D E P E N D E N T R E G I S T E R E D P U B L I C AC C O U N T I N G F I R M

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Baxter International Inc.:

We have completed integrated audits of Baxter International Inc.’s consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our
opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

Consolidated financial statements
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and shareholders’
equity and comprehensive income present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Baxter International Inc. and its subsidiaries at
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the company changed the manner in which it accounts for share-based
compensation and defined benefit postretirement plans in 2006.

Internal control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,
that the company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in Internal
Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The
company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the
company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An
audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures
as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2007

C O N S O L I DAT E D B A L A N C E S H E E T S

as of December 31 (in millions, except share information)

Current Assets

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Other Assets

Cash and equivalents
Accounts and other current receivables
Inventories
Short-term deferred income taxes
Prepaid expenses and other

Total current assets

Goodwill
Other intangible assets
Other

Total other assets

Total assets

Current Liabilities

Short-term debt
Current maturities of long-term debt and lease obligations
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Total current liabilities

Long-Term Debt and Lease Obligations

Other Long-Term Liabilities

Commitments and Contingencies

Shareholders’ Equity

Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 2,000,000,000 shares,
issued 683,494,944 shares in 2006 and 648,483,996 shares
in 2005

Common stock in treasury, at cost, 33,016,340 shares in 2006 and

23,586,172 shares in 2005

Additional contributed capital (revised)
Retained earnings (revised)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss

Total shareholders’ equity

2006

$ 2,485
1,838
2,066
231
350

6,970

4,229

1,618
480
1,389

3,487

2005

841
1,766
1,925
260
324

5,116

4,144

1,552
494
1,421

3,467

$14,686

$12,727

57
177
3,376

3,610

2,567

2,237

141
783
3,241

4,165

2,414

1,849

683

648

(1,433)
5,177
3,271
(1,426)

6,272

(1,150)
3,867
2,430
(1,496)

4,299

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$14,686

$12,727

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

C O N S O L I DAT E D S TAT E M E N T S o f

I N C O M E

years ended December 31 (in millions, except per share data)

Operations

Net sales
Costs and expenses
Cost of goods sold
Marketing and administrative expenses
Research and development expenses
Restructuring charges, net
Other special charges
Net interest expense
Other expense, net

Total costs and expenses

Income from continuing operations before income taxes
Income tax expense

Income from continuing operations
(Loss) income from discontinued operations

2006

$10,378

2005

$9,849

2004

$9,509

5,641
2,282
614
—
—
34
61

8,632

1,746
348

1,398
(1)

5,756
2,030
533
(109)
—
118
77

8,405

1,444
486

958
(2)

5,594
1,960
517
543
289
99
77

9,079

430
47

383
5

Per Share Data

Earnings per basic common share

Net income

$ 1,397

$ 956

$ 388

Continuing operations
Discontinued operations

Net income

Earnings per diluted common share

Continuing operations
Discontinued operations

Net income

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

Basic
Diluted

$ 2.15
—

$ 2.15

$ 2.13
—

$ 2.13

651
656

$ 1.54
—

$ 1.54

$ 1.52
—

$ 1.52

622
629

$ 0.62
0.01

$ 0.63

$ 0.62
0.01

$ 0.63

614
618

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

C O N S O L I DAT E D S TAT E M E N T S o f C A S H F L OW S

years ended December 31 (in millions) (brackets denote cash outflows)

Cash Flows from Operations

Net income
Adjustments

Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income taxes
Stock compensation
Restructuring charges, net
Infusion pump charges
Hemodialysis instrument charges
Other special charges
Other
Changes in balance sheet items

Accounts and other current receivables
Inventories
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Restructuring payments
Other

2006

2005

2004

$ 1,397

956

$ 388

575
8
94
—
76
—
—
34

(16)
(35)
1
(42)
91

580
201
9
(109)
126
50
—
48

178
88
(325)
(117)
(135)

601
(141)
15
543
—
—
289
134

(189)
33
(246)
(195)
148

Cash flows from operations

2,183

1,550

1,380

Cash Flows from
Investing Activities

Cash Flows from
Financing Activities

Capital expenditures (including additions to the pool of

equipment placed with or leased to customers of $124
in 2006, $82 in 2005, and $77 in 2004)

Acquisitions (net of cash received) and investments in

and advances to affiliates

Divestitures and other

Cash flows from investing activities

Issuances of debt
Payments of obligations
Decrease in debt with maturities of three months

or less, net

Cash dividends on common stock
Proceeds and realized excess tax benefits from stock

issued under employee benefit plans

Other issuances of stock
Purchases of treasury stock

Cash flows from financing activities

Effect of Foreign Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Equivalents

Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents

Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Year

Cash and Equivalents at End of Year

Other supplemental information
Interest paid, net of portion capitalized
Income taxes paid

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(526)

(5)
189

(342)

751
(1,294)

—
(364)

272
1,249
(737)

(123)

(74)

1,644

841

(444)

(558)

(47)
124

(367)

1,072
(2,336)

—
(359)

176
—
—

(1,447)

(4)

(268)

1,109

(20)
26

(552)

600
(627)

(351)
(361)

181
—
(18)

(576)

(68)

184

925

$ 2,485

841

$1,109

$ 108
$ 296

$
$

159
176

$ 114
$ 173

C O N S O L I DAT E D S TAT E M E N T S o f S H A R E H O L D E R S ’ E QU I T Y a n d
C O M P R E H E N S I V E I N C O M E

as of and for the years ended December 31 (in millions)

Amount

2006

2005

2004

Common Stock
Beginning of year
Common stock issued
Other

End of year

Common Stock in Treasury
Beginning of year
Purchases of common stock
Common stock issued under employee benefit plans and other

End of year

Additional Contributed Capital (revised)
Beginning of year
Common stock issued
Common stock issued under employee benefit plans and other

End of year

Retained Earnings (revised)
Beginning of year
Net income
Cash dividends on common stock
Net losses on reissuance of treasury shares

End of year

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Beginning of year
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of tax benefit of $117

End of year

Total shareholders’ equity

Comprehensive Income
Net income
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax benefit of $14 in 2006
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations, net of tax (benefit)
expense of ($33) in 2006, $106 in 2005, and ($134) in 2004
Other hedging activities, net of tax expense of $8 in 2006, $38 in

2005, and $21 in 2004

Marketable equity securities, net of tax (benefit) expense of ($1) in

2006, $1 in 2005, and $1 in 2004

Additional minimum pension liability, net of tax expense (benefit) of

$87 in 2006, $12 in 2005 and ($30) in 2004

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Total comprehensive income

648
35
—

683

24
18
(9)

$ 648
35
—

683

(1,150)
(737)
454

(1,433)

3,867
1,214
96

5,177

2,430
1,397
(380)
(176)

3,271

(1,496)
305
(235)

(1,426)

$ 6,272

$ 1,397
227

(93)

—

152

305

648
—
—

648

30
—
(6)

648
—
—

648

(1,511)
—
361

(1,150)

3,856
—
11

3,867

2,000
956
(364)
(162)

2,430

(1,288)
(208)
—

(1,496)

$ 4,299

956
(370)

101

(3)

(208)

649
—
(1)

648

37
1
(8)

649
—
(1)

648

(1,863)
(18)
370

(1,511)

3,871
—
(15)

3,856

2,145
388
(359)
(174)

2,000

(1,420)
132
—

(1,288)

$ 3,705

388
303

(171)

(48)

132

$ 1,702

748

520

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTES to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations
Baxter International Inc. (Baxter or the company) is a global diversi-
fied medical products and services company with expertise in med-
ical devices, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology that assists
healthcare professionals and their patients with the treatment of
complex medical conditions, including hemophilia, immune disor-
ders, cancer, infectious diseases, kidney disease, trauma and other
conditions. The company’s products and services are described in
Note 11.

Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with gen-
erally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and
related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Baxter
and its majority-owned subsidiaries, any minority-owned subsidiaries
that Baxter controls, and variable interest entities in which Baxter is
intercompany
the primary beneficiary,
transactions.

elimination of

after

Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations are accounted for in accordance with State-
ment of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, “Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” In 2002, man-
agement decided to divest certain businesses, principally the major-
ity of the services businesses included in the Renal segment. The
results of operations of these businesses are reported as discontin-
ued operations. Net revenues relating to the discontinued businesses
were insignificant in 2006 and 2005 and totaled $24 million in 2004.
Most of the divestitures were completed in 2003 and 2004, and at
December 31, 2006, the divestiture plan was complete.

Changes in Accounting Principles
SFAS No. 123-R
The company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment” (SFAS No. 123-R) on January 1, 2006. This new standard
requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock
options and similar awards. The company adopted SFAS No. 123-R
using the modified prospective transition method.

In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 123(R)-3, “Transition Election
Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment

stock-based compensation pursuant

Awards” (FSP No. 123(R)-3). The company elected to adopt the
alternative transition method provided in FSP 123(R)-3 for calculating
to
the tax effects of
SFAS No. 123-R. The alternative transition method provides a different
method to establish the beginning balance of the additional contrib-
uted capital pool related to the tax effects of employee stock-based
compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the
additional contributed capital pool and the consolidated statements
of cash flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensa-
tion awards that were outstanding upon adoption of SFAS No. 123-R.

Refer to Note 7 for further information about the company’s stock-
based compensation plans and related accounting treatment in the
current and prior periods.

SFAS No. 151
On January 1, 2006, the company adopted SFAS No. 151, “Inventory
Costs” (SFAS No. 151), which clarifies the accounting for abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage.
SFAS No. 151 requires that those items be recognized as current
period charges. In addition, the new standard requires that the
allocation of fixed production overhead costs be based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. The standard did not have a
material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 158
On December 31, 2006, the company adopted SFAS No. 158,
“Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Pos-
tretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106
and 132(R)” (SFAS No. 158). Refer to Note 8 for further information
regarding the impact on the company’s consolidated financial
statements.

SAB No. 108
the company adopted Securities and
On December 31, 2006,
Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, “Con-
sidering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB No. 108).
SAB No. 108 eliminates the diversity in practice surrounding how
public companies quantify financial statement misstatements and
establishes an approach that requires quantification and assessment
of misstatements based on the effects of the misstatements on each
of the company’s financial statements and the related footnote dis-
closures. Adoption of this new standard did not impact the company’s
financial statements.

Revenue Recognition
The company recognizes revenues from product sales and services
when earned. Specifically, revenue is recognized when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred (or services
the price is fixed or determinable, and
have been rendered),

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

collectibility is reasonably assured. For product sales, revenue is not
recognized until title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer.
The shipping terms for the majority of the company’s revenue arrange-
ments are FOB destination. The recognition of revenue is delayed if
there are significant post-delivery obligations, such as training, instal-
lation or customer acceptance. In certain circumstances, the company
enters into arrangements in which it commits to provide multiple
elements to its customers. In these cases, total revenue is first
allocated among the elements based on the estimated fair values
of the individual elements, then recognized for each element in
accordance with the principles described above. Fair values are
generally determined based on sales of the individual elements to
other third parties. Provisions for discounts, rebates to customers,
and returns are provided for at the time the related sales are recorded,
and are reflected as a reduction of sales.

between the portion sold and the portion retained by Baxter based
on their relative fair values. The fair values of the retained interests are
estimated based on the present values of expected future cash flows.
The difference between the net cash proceeds received and the value
of the receivables sold is recognized immediately as a gain or loss.
The retained interests are subject to impairment reviews and are
classified in current or noncurrent assets, as appropriate.

Product Warranties
The company provides for the estimated costs relating to product
warranties at the time the related revenue is recognized. The cost is
determined based upon actual company experience for the same or
similar products, as well as other relevant information. Product war-
ranty liabilities are adjusted based on changes in estimates.

Foreign Currency Translation
For foreign operations in highly inflationary economies, translation
gains and losses are included in other income or expense. For all
foreign operations, currency translation adjustments are
other
included in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), which
is a component of shareholders’ equity.

Inventories

as of December 31 (in millions)

Raw materials
Work in process
Finished products
Inventories

2006

2005

$ 526
676
864
$2,066

$ 435
614
876
$1,925

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
In the normal course of business, the company provides credit to
customers in the healthcare industry, performs credit evaluations of
these customers and maintains reserves for potential credit losses. In
determining the amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts,
management considers, among other things, historical credit losses,
the past due status of receivables, payment histories and other
customer-specific information. Receivables are written off when man-
agement determines they are uncollectible. Credit losses, when real-
ized, have been within the range of management’s allowance for
doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $127 mil-
lion at December 31, 2006 and $120 million at December 31, 2005.

In 2004, the company recorded a $55 million increase to the allow-
ance for doubtful accounts. The adjustment primarily related to the
uncertain collectibility of the company’s loan to Cerus Corporation
(Cerus) based on Cerus’ current financial position at the time of the
charge. Baxter owns approximately 1% of the common stock of Cerus.
In February 2005, Cerus and the company settled the loan in an
amount approximating the company’s reserved receivable. The
adjustment also related to certain Shared Investment Plan participant
loan defaults and certain other receivables. Refer to Note 5 for further
information regarding the Shared Investment Plan.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or
market value. Market value for raw materials is based on replacement
costs, and market value for work in process and finished goods is
based on net realizable value. The inventory amounts above are
stated net of reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, which
totaled $180 million at December 31, 2006 and $146 million at
December 31, 2005.

In 2004, the company recorded a $28 million increase to the Bio-
Science segment’s inventory reserves. The adjustment was based
upon restructuring decisions, to focus on more profitable sales in the
plasma market.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

as of December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

Land
Buildings and leasehold improvements
Machinery and equipment
Equipment with customers
Construction in progress
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
Property, plant and equipment, net (PP&E)

$ 143
1,632
5,003
860
673
8,311
(4,082)
$ 4,229

169
1,594
4,710
723
682
7,878
(3,734)
$ 4,144

Receivable Securitizations
When the company sells receivables in a securitization arrangement,
the historical carrying value of the sold receivables is allocated

Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

range from 20 to 50 years for buildings and improvements and from
three to 15 years for machinery and equipment. Leasehold improve-
ments are amortized over the life of the related facility lease (includ-
ing any renewal periods, if appropriate) or the asset, whichever is
shorter. Straight-line and accelerated methods of depreciation are
used for income tax purposes. Depreciation expense was $488 million
in 2006, $482 million in 2005 and $481 million in 2004. Repairs and
maintenance expense was $215 million in 2006, $190 million in
2005 and $193 million in 2004.

Acquisitions
Results of operations of acquired companies are included in the
company’s results of operations as of the respective acquisition
dates. The purchase price of each acquisition is allocated to the
net assets acquired based on estimates of their fair values at the date
of the acquisition. Any purchase price in excess of these net assets is
recorded as goodwill. Contingent purchase price payments are
recorded when the contingencies are resolved. The contingent con-
sideration, if paid, is recorded as an additional element of the cost of
the acquired company or as compensation, as appropriate.

Impairment Reviews
Goodwill
Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to at least annual impair-
ment reviews, or whenever indicators of impairment exist. An impair-
ment would occur if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds
the fair value of that reporting unit. The company measures goodwill
for impairment based on its reportable segments, which are Bio-
Science, Medication Delivery and Renal. An impairment charge would
be recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the
present value of estimated future cash flows, which represents the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit.

Other Long-Lived Assets
The company reviews the carrying amounts of long-lived assets other
than goodwill for potential impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Examples of such a change in circumstances include
a significant decrease in market price, a significant adverse change in
the extent or manner in which an asset is being used, or a significant
adverse change in the legal or business climate. In evaluating recov-
erability, the company groups assets and liabilities at the lowest level
such that the identifiable cash flows relating to the group are largely
independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. The
company then compares the carrying amounts of the assets or asset
groups with the related estimated undiscounted future cash flows. In
the event
impairment exists, an impairment charge would be
recorded as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset
or asset group exceeds the fair value. Depending on the asset and the
availability of information, fair value may be determined by reference

to estimated selling values of assets in similar condition, or by using a
discounted cash flow model. In addition, the remaining amortization
period for the impaired asset would be reassessed and revised if
necessary.

Earnings Per Share
The numerator of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) is
net income. The denominator for basic EPS is the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive
effect of outstanding employee stock options, employee stock pur-
chase subscriptions, the purchase contracts in the company’s equity
units (which were settled in February 2006), restricted stock and
restricted stock units is reflected in the denominator for diluted EPS
principally using the treasury stock method.

The equity unit purchase contracts obligated the holders to purchase
between 35.0 and 43.4 million shares (based upon a specified
exchange ratio) of Baxter common stock in February 2006 for
$1.25 billion. Using the treasury stock method, prior to the February
2006 purchase date, the purchase contracts had a dilutive effect
when the average market price of Baxter stock exceeded $35.69. As
discussed further in Note 5, in November 2005, the company suc-
cessfully remarketed the senior notes (and paid down approximately
$1 billion of the $1.25 billion outstanding), and in February 2006, the
purchase contracts matured and the company issued approximately
35 million shares of common stock in exchange for $1.25 billion.

Employee stock options to purchase 36 million, 29 million and
37 million shares in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, were not
included in the computation of diluted EPS because the assumed
proceeds were greater than the average market price of the compa-
ny’s common stock, resulting in an anti-dilutive effect on diluted
earnings per share.

The following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares.

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

Basic shares
Effect of dilutive securities
Employee stock options
Equity unit purchase contracts and other

Diluted shares

651

622

614

4
1
656

5
2
629

3
1
618

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in shareholders’ equity
that do not arise from transactions with shareholders, and consists of
net income, currency translation adjustments (CTA), unrealized gains
and losses on certain hedging activities, pension and other employee
benefits and unrealized gains and losses on unrestricted availa-
ble-for-sale marketable equity securities. The net-of-tax components
of AOCI, a component of shareholders’ equity, were as follows.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

as of December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

CTA
Hedges of net investments in

$ (148)

222

foreign operations

(676)

(583)

(684)

Pension and other employee

benefits

Other hedging activities
Marketable equity securities
Accumulated other

(821)
(9)
1

(738)
(28)
1

(735)
(91)
—

comprehensive loss

$(1,426)

$(1,496)

$(1,288)

Derivatives and Hedging Activities
All derivative instruments subject to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting For
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and its amendments
are recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value.

For each derivative instrument that is designated and effective as a
cash flow hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in
earnings with the underlying hedged item. Cash flow hedges are
principally classified in cost of goods sold, and they primarily relate to
intercompany sales denominated in foreign currencies.

For each derivative instrument that is designated and effective as a
fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized
immediately to earnings, and offsets the gain or loss on the under-
lying hedged item. Fair value hedges are classified in net interest
expense, as they hedge the interest rate risk associated with certain
of the company’s fixed-rate debt.

For each derivative or nonderivative instrument that is designated and
effective as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, the
gain or loss is recorded in AOCI, with any hedge ineffectiveness
recorded immediately in net interest expense. As for CTA, upon sale
or liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity, the amount attrib-
utable to that entity and accumulated in AOCI would be removed from
AOCI and reported as part of the gain or loss in the period during
which the sale or liquidation of the investment occurs.

Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as
hedges are reported directly to earnings. Undesignated derivative
instruments are recorded in other income or expense (foreign cur-
rency forward and option agreements) or net interest expense (cross-
currency interest-rate swap agreements). The company does not hold
any instruments for trading purposes.

If it is determined that a derivative or nonderivative hedging instru-
ment is no longer highly effective as a hedge, the company discon-
tinues hedge accounting prospectively. If the company removes the
designation for cash flow hedges because the hedged forecasted
transactions are no longer probable of occurring, any gains or losses
are immediately reclassified from AOCI to earnings. Gains or losses

relating to terminations of effective cash flow hedges are deferred and
recognized consistent with the income or loss recognition of the
underlying hedged items.

Derivatives are classified in the consolidated balance sheet in other
assets or other liabilities, as applicable, and are classified as short-
term or long-term based on the scheduled maturity of the instrument.

Derivatives, including those that are not designated as a hedge under
SFAS No. 133, are principally classified in the operating section of the
consolidated statement of cash flows, in the same category as the
related consolidated balance sheet account. Cross-currency swap
agreements that include a financing element at inception are classi-
fied in the financing section of the consolidated statement of cash
flows when settled. Cross-currency swap agreements that did not
include a financing element at inception are classified in the oper-
ating section.

Cash and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents include cash, certificates of deposit and mar-
ketable securities with an original maturity of three months or less.

Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping costs, which are costs incurred to physically move product
from Baxter’s premises to the customer’s premises, are classified as
marketing and administrative expenses. Handling costs, which are
costs incurred to store, move and prepare products for shipment, are
classified as cost of goods sold. Approximately $224 million in 2006,
$211 million in 2005 and $214 million in 2004 of costs were clas-
sified in marketing and administrative expenses.

Research and Development Costs
Research and development (R&D) costs are expensed as incurred,
including the value of any in-process R&D acquired in an asset
acquisition or business combination.

Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are recognized for the future tax effects of temporary
differences between financial and income tax reporting based upon
enacted tax laws and rates. The company maintains valuation allow-
ances unless it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the
deferred tax asset will be realized. The company records reserves for
uncertain tax positions, based upon the technical support for the
positions the company’s past audit experience with similar situa-
tions, and potential interest and penalties related to the matters.

Reclassifications and Revisions
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior period
consolidated financial statements and notes to the current period

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

presentation. In addition, certain prior year amounts have been
revised to classify losses in excess of previously recorded gains
associated with the reissuance of treasury stock in retained earnings.
Previously, gains and losses on the reissuance of treasury stock were
recorded in additional contributed capital. The impact of this revision
on the retained earnings balance at January 1, 2004 was $85 million.
These revisions had no impact on previously reported total share-
holders’ equity, net income or cash flows.

New Accounting Standards
SFAS Nos. 155 and 156
During the first quarter of 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,
“Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — an amend-
ment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” (SFAS No. 155) and
SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Instruments —
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (SFAS No. 156).
SFAS No. 155 requires that interests in securitized financial assets
be evaluated to determine whether they contain embedded deriva-
tives, and permits the accounting for any such hybrid financial instru-
ments as single financial instruments at fair value with changes in fair
value recognized directly in earnings. SFAS No. 156 specifies that
servicing assets or liabilities recognized upon the sale of financial
assets must be initially measured at fair value, and subsequently
either measured at fair value or amortized in proportion to and over
the period of estimated net servicing income or loss. The new stan-
dards, which become effective on January 1, 2007, are not expected
to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial
statements.

FIN No. 48
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48,
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of
FASB Statement 109” (FIN No. 48), which will be effective for the
company on January 1, 2007. FIN No. 48 prescribes a two-step
process for the financial statement measurement and recognition
of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first
step involves the determination of whether it is more likely than not
that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, based on the
technical merits of the position. The second step requires that any tax
position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold be
measured and recognized in the financial statements at the largest
amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance

on the accounting for related interest and penalties, financial
statement classification and disclosure. The company has substan-
tially completed its review of its tax positions and does not expect
that there will be a material impact on the company’s opening
balance of retained earnings or its statement of financial position.

SFAS No. 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (SFAS No. 157), which clarifies the definition of fair
value whenever another standard requires or permits assets or lia-
bilities to be measured at fair value. Specifically, the standard clar-
ifies that fair value should be based on the assumptions market
participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, and estab-
lishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to
develop those assumptions. SFAS No. 157 does not expand the use
of fair value to any new circumstances. The standard also requires
expanded financial statement disclosures about fair value measure-
ments, including disclosure of the methods used and the effect on
earnings. The company is in the process of analyzing this new stan-
dard, which will be effective for the company on January 1, 2008.

NOTE 2
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The following is a summary of the activity in goodwill by business
segment.

(in millions)

BioScience

Medication
Delivery

Renal

Total

December 31, 2004

$583

$895 $170 $1,648

Divestiture of Taiwanese
services business

Other

December 31, 2005

Other

December 31, 2006

—
(19)
564
15
$579

—
(40)
855
43

(28)
(28)
(68)
(9)
1,552
133
66
8
$898 $141 $1,618

The Other category in the table above principally relates to foreign
currency fluctuations and includes individually insignificant acquisi-
tions and divestitures.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-
line basis over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives are not material to the company. The following
is a summary of
to
amortization.

the company’s intangible assets subject

Developed
technology,
including
patents

Manufacturing,
distribution
and other
contracts Other

Total

$827
418
$409

$34
19
$15

$88 $949
476
$49 $473

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

as of December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

Accounts payable, principally trade
Income taxes payable
Common stock dividends payable
Employee compensation and withholdings
Property, payroll and certain other taxes
Infusion pumps and hemodialysis instruments

reserves

Pension and other employee benefits
Derivative instruments
Restructuring reserves
Litigation reserves
Other
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$ 878
515
380
365
177

132
67
59
55
25
723
$3,376

$ 732
504
364
308
151

137
83
63
98
44
757
$3,241

Other Long-Term Liabilities

$784
368
$416

$34
15
$19

$82 $900
413
$52 $487

as of December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

Pension and other employee benefits
Cross-currency swaps
Litigation reserves
Other
Other long-term liabilities

$1,060
699
83
395
$2,237

$ 853
645
93
258
$1,849

Net Interest Expense

(in millions, except
amortization period data)

December 31, 2006
Gross other intangible

assets

Accumulated amortization
Other intangible assets
Weighted-average

amortization period
(in years)

December 31, 2005
Gross other intangible

assets

Accumulated amortization
Other intangible assets
Weighted-average

amortization period
(in years)

The amortization expense for these intangible assets was $56 million
in 2006, $58 million in 2005 and $63 million in 2004. At Decem-
ber 31, 2006, the anticipated annual amortization expense for these
intangible assets is $54 million in 2007, $49 million in 2008,
$48 million in 2009, $45 million in 2010 and $41 million in 2011.

Other Long-Term Assets

as of December 31 (in millions)

Deferred income taxes
Insurance receivables
Other long-term receivables
Other
Other long-term assets

2006

2005

$ 936
53
246
154
$1,389

$ 779
69
335
238
$1,421

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

Interest costs
Interest costs capitalized
Interest expense
Interest income
Net interest expense

Other Expense, Net

$116
(15)
101
(67)
$ 34

$184
(18)
166
(48)
$118

$144
(18)
126
(27)
$ 99

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

Equity method loss and minority interests
Asset dispositions and
impairments, net

Foreign exchange
Costs relating to early extinguishment and

repurchase of debt
Legal settlements, net
Securitization and factoring arrangements
Other
Other expense, net

$23

$15

$ 7

(6)
15

2
19

—
8
18
3
$61

17
(11)
13
22
$77

17
36

—
—
4
13
$77

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

NOTE 3
SALE OF TRANSFUSION THERAPIES BUSINESS

NOTE 4
RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER SPECIAL CHARGES

On October 2, 2006, the company entered into a definitive agreement
to sell substantially all of the assets and liabilities of its Transfusion
Therapies (TT) business to an affiliate of Texas Pacific Group (TPG) for
$540 million. Subject to customary closing conditions, including,
among other things, the receipt of necessary government approvals,
the sale is expected to close in the first quarter of 2007. As discussed
below, the agreements with the buyer provide that Baxter will deliver
certain manufacturing and other services for a period of time post-
divestiture. Under the terms of the sale agreement, TPG will acquire
the net assets of the TT business, including its product portfolio of
manual and automated blood-collection products and storage equip-
ment, as well as five manufacturing facilities located in Haina,
Dominican Republic; La Chatre, France; Maricao and San German,
Puerto Rico; and Nabeul, Tunisia. The decision to sell the TT net assets
was based on the results of strategic and financial reviews of the
company’s business portfolio, and will allow the company to increase
its focus and investment on businesses with more long-term strategic
value to the company.

Under transition agreements, the company will provide manufactur-
ing and a variety of support services to the business for a period of
time after the divestiture, which varies based on the product or
service provided and other factors. Due to the company’s expected
significant continuing cash flows associated with this business, the
company has not presented the results of operations of TT as a
discontinued operation in the company’s results of operations. TT
is part of the BioScience segment and its sales were $516 million,
$547 million and $550 million for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The major classes of the assets and liabilities classified as held for
sale were included in the consolidated balance sheets as of Decem-
ber 31, 2006 and 2005 as follows.

as of December 31 (in millions)

Current assets
Noncurrent assets

Total assets
Total liabilities

2006

2005

$208
$206
$414
$ 64

$209
$226
$435
$ 76

The company currently projects that a modest gain will be recognized
on the divestiture closing date. The income statement effect of the
sale will depend on the book values of the net assets to be sold on the
closing date, and will be recorded net of transaction costs, a required
allocation of a portion of BioScience segment goodwill (not included
in the table above), and other items. Also, a portion of the $540 mil-
lion cash proceeds will be allocated to the manufacturing and other
transition agreements as partial consideration for those services.

Restructuring Charges
The following is a summary of restructuring charges recorded by the
company in 2004, and income adjustments recorded in 2005 related
to restructuring charges.

2005 Adjustments to Restructuring Charges
During 2005, the company recorded a $109 million benefit ($83 mil-
lion, or $0.13 per diluted share, on an after-tax basis) relating to the
adjustment of restructuring charges recorded in 2004 (as discussed
below) and a prior restructuring program ($61 million of which related
to the reserve for cash costs for the 2004 program, as detailed in the
table below), as the implementation of the programs progressed,
actions were completed, and the company refined its estimates of
remaining spending. The restructuring reserve adjustments princi-
pally related to severance and other employee-related costs. The
company’s targeted headcount reductions were achieved with a
higher level of attrition than originally anticipated. Accordingly, the
company’s severance payments were projected to be lower than
originally estimated. The remaining reserve adjustments principally
related to changes in estimates regarding certain contract termination
costs, certain adjustments related to asset disposal proceeds that
were in excess of original estimates, and the finalization of certain
employment termination arrangements. Additional adjustments may
be recorded in the future as the restructuring programs are
completed.

2004 Restructuring Charge
In 2004, the company recorded a $543 million restructuring charge
($394 million, or $0.64 per diluted share, on an after-tax basis),
principally associated with the company’s decision to implement
actions to reduce the company’s overall cost structure and to drive
sustainable improvements in financial performance. The charge was
primarily for severance and costs associated with the closing of
facilities and the exiting of contracts.

These actions included the elimination of over 4,000 positions, or 8%
of the global workforce, as the company was reorganized and stream-
lined. Approximately 50% of the eliminated positions were in the
United States. Approximately three-quarters of the estimated savings
impacted general and administrative expenses, with the remainder
primarily impacting cost of goods sold. The eliminations impacted all
three of the company’s segments, along with the corporate head-
quarters and administrative functions.

Included in the charge was $196 million relating to asset impair-
ments, almost all of which was to write down PP&E. A portion of the
impairment charge related to assets being offered for sale, and the
fair value of the assets was estimated based on the sales prices being
negotiated at the time of the charge. The remainder of the impairment

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

charge principally related to assets that were under construction and
other assets that were abandoned by the company. Generally, there
was no market for these assets and, accordingly, the company’s
determination of fair value assumed no residual value for these
assets. Also included in the charge was $347 million for cash costs,
principally pertaining to severance and other employee-related costs.

Restructuring Reserves
The following summarizes cash activity in the reserve related to the
2004 restructuring charge.

(in millions)

Charge
Utilization
December 31, 2004
Utilization
Adjustments
December 31, 2005
Utilization
December 31, 2006

Employee-
related
costs

Contractual
and other
costs

$212
(60)
152
(67)
(40)
45
(31)
$ 14

$135
(32)
103
(34)
(21)
48
(7)
$ 41

Total

$ 347
(92)
255
(101)
(61)
93
(38)
$ 55

Restructuring reserve utilization in 2006 totaled $42 million, with
$38 million relating to the 2004 program (as detailed above), and
$4 million relating to a program initiated in 2003, which is now
complete. Substantially all of the remaining reserve is expected to be
utilized in 2007, with the rest of the cash outflows principally relating
to certain long-term leases and remaining employee severance pay-
ments. The company believes that the restructuring programs are
substantially complete and that the remaining reserves are adequate.
However, remaining cash payments are subject to change.

Other Charges
The company recorded other special charges of $76 million, $176 mil-
lion and $289 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
net-of-tax impact of the charges was $64 million ($0.10 per diluted
share) in 2006, $132 million ($0.21 per diluted share) in 2005 and
$245 million ($0.40 per diluted share) in 2004. The 2006 and 2005
charges were classified in cost of goods sold in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income, and related to actions the com-
pany took to address issues related to infusion pumps, and costs
associated with the exit of hemodialysis instruments manufacturing.
The 2004 charges are classified in the other special charges line in the
consolidated statements of
income, and related to asset
impairments.

The actual costs relating to certain of these matters may differ from
the company’s estimates. It is possible that additional charges may
be required in future periods, based on new information or changes in
estimates.

Infusion Pump Charges
The company recorded charges of
COLLEAGUE and SYNDEO Pumps
$76 million in 2006 and $77 million in 2005 related to issues
associated with its COLLEAGUE and SYNDEO infusion pumps.

On July 21, 2005, the company announced that the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) had classified a March 15, 2005 company
notice to customers regarding certain user interface and failure code
issues relating to the company’s COLLEAGUE pump as a Class I recall,
the FDA’s highest priority. Also, in a field corrective action letter sent
to customers on July 20, 2005 (which the FDA separately designated a
Class I recall), the company announced that it was in the process of
developing an action plan to address design issues relating to
COLLEAGUE pump failure codes. On September 21, 2005, the com-
pany announced that the FDA had classified a February 25, 2005 com-
pany notice to customers regarding certain issues with the batteries
of the COLLEAGUE volumetric infusion pump as a Class I recall. On
October 13, 2005, the company further announced that the FDA had
seized approximately 6,000 Baxter-owned COLLEAGUE pumps, as
well as 850 SYNDEO PCA syringe pumps, which were on hold at
two facilities in Northern Illinois (the company having placed a hold
on shipment of new COLLEAGUE and SYNDEO pumps earlier in the
year). These actions did not affect customer-owned pumps. On Feb-
ruary 2, 2006, the company announced that the FDA had classified a
December 13, 2005 notice to customers regarding COLLEAGUE pump
battery undercharge, air-detected alarms, gearbox wear, underinfu-
sion, and undetected upstream occlusions as a Class I recall. As
previously announced, there have been reports of eight deaths and a
number of serious injuries that may be associated with design issues
with the COLLEAGUE infusion pump. The company’s sales of
COLLEAGUE pumps totaled approximately $170 million in 2004
and $85 million in the first half of 2005. There were no sales of
COLLEAGUE pumps during the last six months of 2005 or the first six
months of 2006. By the end of 2006, the remediation plan outside of
the United States was substantially complete, and sales of COL-
LEAGUE pumps had resumed in all key markets outside of the United
States.

In December 2006, the company received conditional approval from
the FDA for the company’s plan to resolve issues with the pumps
currently in use in the United States. On February 27, 2007, the
company received clearance from the FDA on its COLLEAGUE infusion
pump 510(k) pre-market notification. The company is preparing to
modify pumps currently in the United States and will soon submit
manufacturing and service documentation to the FDA in advance of
deploying upgrades to these COLLEAGUE infusion pumps.

Included in the $77 million charge in 2005 was $73 million for cash
costs and $4 million relating to asset impairments. The $73 million
reserve represents an estimate of the cash expenditures for the
materials, labor and freight costs expected to be incurred to remedi-
ate the design issues. In 2006, the company recorded an additional

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

$76 million pre-tax charge, of which $73 million related to
COLLEAGUE infusion pumps and $3 million related to SYNDEO PCA
syringe pumps. Included in the $76 million charge in 2006 was
$73 million for cash costs and $3 million relating to asset impair-
ments. The $73 million reserve for cash costs recorded in 2006
related to additional customer accommodations and adjustments
to the previously established reserves for remediation costs based on
further definition of the potential remediation requirements and the
company’s experience remediating pumps outside of the United
States. Also in 2006, the company recorded an additional $18 million
pre-tax expense, of which $7 million related to asset impairments and
$11 million related to additional warranty and other commitments
made to customers.

In 2006, the company utilized $42 million of the reserve for cash
costs related to the COLLEAGUE and SYNDEO infusion pumps.

6060 Infusion Pump The company recorded a $49 million charge in
2005 for costs associated with withdrawing its 6060 multi-therapy
infusion pump from the market. On November 15, 2005, the company
announced in a field corrective action letter to customers that it
planned to withdraw its 6060 multi-therapy infusion pump from the
market over 12 months due to potential issues with the pump. As of
December 31, 2006, the plan was substantially complete. In 2005,
the company also entered into an agreement with Smiths Medical to
distribute Smiths Medical’s ambulatory infusion pumps, sets and
ancillary products. This agreement enables Baxter to continue to
focus on sales of parenteral nutrition products, pre-mixed drugs
and fluids to the ambulatory care market. The decision to withdraw
the 6060 multi-therapy infusion pump and the new agreement have
not had a material impact on sales.

Included in the $49 million charge was $41 million for cash costs. The
charge principally consisted of the estimated costs to provide custom-
ers with replacement pumps, with the remainder of the charge related
to asset impairments, principally to write off customer lease receiv-
ables. During 2006, the company recorded a $16 million adjustment to
reduce the amount of the reserve, as the estimated costs associated
with providing customers with replacement pumps were refined. The
company utilized $17 million of the reserve for cash costs in 2006, and
the retirement program is expected to be completed in 2007.

Infusion Pump Reserves
The following summarizes cash activity in the company’s infusion
pump reserves, including the COLLEAGUE, SYNDEO and 6060 infusion
pumps, through December 31, 2006.

(in millions)

Charges
Utilization
December 31, 2005
Charges
Utilization
Adjustment
December 31, 2006

COLLEAGUE
and SYNDEO

$ 73
(4)
69
84
(42)
—
$111

6060

$ 41
—
41
—
(17)
(16)
$ 8

Total

$114
(4)
110
84
(59)
(16)
$119

Hemodialysis Instruments
In 2005, the company recorded a $50 million charge associated with
management’s decision to discontinue the manufacture of hemodi-
alysis (HD) instruments, including the company’s Meridian instru-
ment. In December 2005, the FDA classified a September 28, 2005
urgent product recall letter from Baxter to customers regarding the
company’s Meridian HD instrument as a Class I recall. The letter
related to issues associated with the blood tubing sets used with the
Meridian instrument. This classification does not require the return of
Meridian instruments currently in the market.

Separately, during 2005, the company entered into an arrangement
with Gambro Renal Products (Gambro) to distribute Gambro’s HD
instruments and related ancillary products. The decision to stop
manufacturing HD instruments and the distribution arrangement with
Gambro are consistent with the company’s strategy to optimize and
improve the financial performance of the Renal business, by focusing
resources on peritoneal dialysis therapies while maintaining a broad
portfolio of HD products. The company continues to distribute its
existing line of HD dialyzers and provide HD solutions and
concentrates.

Included in the $50 million charge was $23 million relating to asset
impairments, principally to write down inventory based on current
sales projections, and equipment and other assets used to manu-
facture HD machines principally based on market data and dis-
counted cash flow analyses relating to the assets. The remaining
$27 million of the charge related to the estimated cash payments
associated with providing customers with replacement instruments.
The company has utilized $14 million of the reserve for cash costs
through the end of 2006. The remainder of the reserve is expected to
be utilized in 2007.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

2004 Special Charges
In 2004, the company recorded a $289 million charge relating to
asset impairments. Approximately $197 million of the charge related
to assets used in the company’s PreFluCel influenza vaccine program
due to expected delays in launching this product. In December 2004,
the company suspended enrollment in the Phase II/III clinical study in
Europe relating to this program, due to a higher than expected rate of
mild fever and associated symptoms in the clinical trial participants.
Approximately $42 million of the charge related to the write-down of
fixed and intangible assets associated with the company’s recombi-
nant erythropoietin drug (EPOMAX) for the treatment of anemia, which
was due to the company’s decision to discontinue further development
of this technology. The remaining $50 million of the charge related to
Suite D manufacturing assets in the company’s Thousand Oaks, Cal-
ifornia manufacturing facility. As a result of manufacturing process
improvements at the company’s Neuchâtel, Switzerland facility, and
the existing manufacturing capacity available at Thousand Oaks, Cal-
ifornia, where the company’s RECOMBINATE Antihemophilic Factor
(rAHF) product is produced, in December 2004 the company decided
to keep Suite D fully decommissioned, resulting in an impairment
charge. The fair value estimates used in determining the amount of the
impairment losses relating to the fixed and intangible assets were
principally based on market data relating to the assets.

NOTE 5
DEBT, CREDIT FACILITIES, AND COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES

Debt Outstanding
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the company had the following debt
outstanding.

as of December 31 (in millions)

5.75% notes due 2006
Variable-rate loan due 2007
7.125% notes due 2007
1.02% notes due 2007
Variable-rate loan due 2008
7.25% notes due 2008
9.5% notes due 2008
5.196% notes due 2008
Variable-rate loan due 2008
4.75% notes due 2010
Variable-rate loan due 2010
4.625% notes due 2015
5.9% notes due 2016
6.625% debentures due 2028
Other
Total debt and capital lease obligations
Current portion
Long-term portion

Effective
interest rate1

20062

20052

6.4% $
1.2%
7.2%
1.3%
6.2%
6.6%
9.5%
5.4%
4.4%
5.0%
0.6%
4.8%
5.6%
6.7%

— $ 782
99
—
55
55
120
120
40
40
29
29
79
78
250
251
300
139
499
499
138
136
577
571
—
598
157
156
72
72
3,197
2,744
(783)
(177)
$2,567 $2,414

1 Excludes the effect of related interest rate swaps, as applicable.

2 Book values include discounts, premiums and adjustments related

to hedging instruments, as applicable.

In addition, as further discussed below, the company has short-term
debt totaling $57 million at December 31, 2006 and $141 million at
December 31, 2005.

Significant Debt Issuances, Repurchases and Redemptions
Significant Debt Issuances
In August 2006, the company issued $600 million of term debt,
maturing in September 2016 and bearing a 5.9% coupon rate. The net
proceeds are being used for the repayment of outstanding indebt-
edness and general corporate purposes, which may include acquisi-
tions, additions to working capital, capital expenditures and
investments in the company’s subsidiaries.

In October 2005, Baxter Finco B.V., an indirectly wholly-owned finance
subsidiary of Baxter International Inc., issued $500 million of 4.75%
five-year senior unsecured notes, generating net proceeds of
$496 million. The notes, which are irrevocably, fully and uncondi-
tionally guaranteed by Baxter International Inc., are redeemable, in
whole or in part, at Baxter Finco B.V.’s option, subject to a make-whole

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

premium. The indenture includes certain covenants, including restric-
tions relating to the company’s creation of secured debt, transfers of
principal facilities, and sale and leaseback transactions.

In November 2005, the company drew $300 million under an existing
European credit facility, which is further discussed below, of which
$139 million was outstanding at December 31, 2006. This variable-
rate debt is due in 2008.

Repurchase of Notes Included in Equity Units
In December 2002, the company issued equity units for $1.25 billion
in an underwritten public offering. Each equity unit consisted of senior
notes ($1.25 billion in total) that were scheduled to mature in Feb-
ruary 2008, and a purchase contract. The purchase contracts obli-
gated the holders to purchase between 35.0 and 43.4 million shares
(based upon a specified exchange ratio) of Baxter common stock in
February 2006 for $1.25 billion. Baxter made interest payments to the
note holders at an annual rate of 3.6%, and payments to the purchase
contract holders at an annual rate of 3.4%.

As originally scheduled, in November 2005 the $1.25 billion of notes
were remarketed, and the 3.6% annual interest rate was reset to
5.196%. As discussed in Note 9, in 2005 the company repatriated
approximately $2.1 billion of foreign earnings under the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004. Using a portion of the repatriation cash
proceeds, the company bid for, purchased and retired $1 billion of the
remarketed notes. The outstanding remarketed notes mature in 2008.

In February 2006, the purchase contracts matured and Baxter issued
approximately 35 million shares of Baxter common stock for $1.25 bil-
lion. The company has been using the cash proceeds from the set-
tlement of the equity units purchase contracts to pay down existing
debt (as further discussed below), for stock repurchases and for other
general corporate purposes.

Redemptions
Using the cash proceeds from the settlement of the equity units
purchase contracts, the company paid down its 5.75% notes, which
approximated $780 million, upon their maturity in February 2006. In
November 2005, the company redeemed the approximately $500 mil-
lion outstanding of its 5.25% notes, which were due in 2007. The
company incurred $17 million in costs associated with the repur-
chase of the notes included in the equity units and the redemption of
the 5.25% notes in 2005. These costs are included in other expense,
net in the consolidated statements of income.

Future Minimum Lease Payments and Debt Maturities

as of and for the years ended December 31
(in millions)

Operating
leases

Debt maturities
and capital
leases

2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Thereafter
Total obligations and commitments
Interest on capital leases, discounts and
premiums, and adjustments relating
to hedging instruments

Long-term debt and lease obligations

$140
114
96
82
74
112
618

n/a
$618

$ 177
564
6
641
6
1,380
2,774

(30)
$2,744

Credit Facilities
The company has two primary revolving credit facilities, which totaled
approximately $2.2 billion at December 31, 2006. In December 2006,
the company replaced its existing $640 million and $800 million
revolving credit facilities with a $1.5 billion five-year revolving credit
facility. The second facility, which is denominated in Euros, totals
approximately $660 million and matures in January 2008. These
facilities enable the company to borrow funds in U.S. Dollars, Euros,
Japanese Yen or Swiss Francs on an unsecured basis at variable
interest rates and contain various covenants, including a maximum
net-debt-to-capital ratio and, solely with respect to the Euro-denom-
inated facility, a minimum interest coverage ratio. At December 31,
2006, the company was in compliance with the financial covenants in
these agreements. Borrowings outstanding under these facilities
totaled $139 million at December 31, 2006. There were no other
borrowings outstanding under the company’s primary credit facilities
at December 31, 2006.

The company also maintains other credit arrangements, which totaled
$341 million at December 31, 2006 and $544 million at December 31,
2005. Borrowings outstanding under these facilities totaled $57 mil-
lion at December 31, 2006 and $141 million at December 31, 2005.

Credit Rating Requirements
As discussed further in Note 6, the company uses foreign currency
and interest rate derivative instruments for hedging purposes. One of
the company’s agreements includes a provision whereby the counter-
party financial institution could cause the arrangement to be termi-
nated if Baxter’s credit rating on its senior unsecured debt declined to
BBB- or Baa3 (i.e., a two-rating or four-rating downgrade, depending
upon the rating agency).

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

Leases
The company leases certain facilities and equipment under capital
and operating leases expiring at various dates. The leases generally
provide for the company to pay taxes, maintenance, insurance and
certain other operating costs of the leased property. Most of the
operating leases contain renewal options. Operating lease rent
expense was $146 million in 2006, $138 million in 2005 and
$149 million in 2004.

Other Commitments and Contingencies
Shared Investment Plan
In order to align management and shareholder interests, in 1999 the
company sold shares of the company’s stock to Baxter’s senior
managers. The participants used five-year, full-recourse personal
bank loans to purchase the stock. Baxter guaranteed repayment to
the banks in the event a participant in the plan defaulted on his or her
obligations, which were due on May 6, 2004.

In order to continue to align management and shareholder interests
and to balance both the short- and long-term needs of Baxter, the
board of directors authorized the company to provide a new three-
year guarantee at the May 6, 2004 loan due date for non-executive
officer employees who elected to extend their loans. The outstanding
amount of the company’s loan guarantee relating to eligible employ-
ees who extended their loans was $39 million at December 31, 2006
and $83 million at December 31, 2005. The loans are due in full on
May 6, 2007.

Joint Development and Commercialization Arrangements
In the normal course of business, Baxter enters into joint develop-
ment and commercialization arrangements with third parties, some-
times with investees of the company. The arrangements vary, but
generally provide that Baxter will receive certain rights to manufac-
ture, market or distribute a specified technology or product under
development by the third party, in exchange for payments by Baxter
when the third party achieves certain pre-clinical, clinical and regu-
latory authorization milestones. At December 31, 2006, the unfunded
milestone payments under these arrangements totaled approxi-
mately $450 million. Based on the company’s projections, any con-
tingent payments made in the future will be more than offset over
time by the estimated net future cash flows relating to the rights
acquired for those payments.

The majority of the unfunded milestone payments pertain to the
BioScience segment. Two of the agreements, one with Nektar Ther-
apeutics and the other with Lipoxen Technologies, were entered into
in 2005 and relate to the development of longer-acting forms of blood
clotting proteins, with the objective of reducing the frequency of
injections required to treat blood clotting disorders such as hemo-
philia A. Also in 2005, the company entered into an agreement with
Kuros Biosurgery AG to obtain exclusive rights to develop and

commercialize hard and soft tissue-repair products using the part-
ner’s proprietary biologics and related binding technology. The objec-
tive of this collaboration is to position the BioScience segment to
enter the orthobiologic market.

Indemnifications
During the normal course of business, Baxter makes certain indem-
nities, commitments and guarantees pursuant to which the company
may be required to make payments related to specific transactions.
These include: (i) intellectual property indemnities to customers in
connection with the use, sales or license of products and services;
(ii) indemnities to customers in connection with losses incurred while
performing services on their premises; (iii) indemnities to vendors
and service providers pertaining to claims based on negligence or
willful misconduct; and (iv) indemnities involving the representations
and warranties in certain contracts.
In addition, under Baxter’s
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, and consistent
with Delaware General Corporation Law, the company has agreed to
indemnify its directors and officers for certain losses and expenses
upon the occurrence of certain prescribed events. The majority of
these indemnities, commitments and guarantees do not provide for
any limitation on the maximum potential for future payments that the
company could be obligated to make. To help address these risks, the
company maintains various insurance coverages. Based on historical
experience and evaluation of the agreements, the company does not
believe that any significant payments related to its indemnifications
will result, and therefore the company has not recorded any associ-
ated liabilities.

Legal Contingencies
Refer
contingencies.

to Note 10 for a discussion of

the company’s legal

NOTE 6
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT

Receivable Securitizations
Where economical, the company has entered into agreements with
various financial institutions in which undivided interests in certain
pools of receivables are sold. The securitized receivables principally
consist of hardware lease receivables originated in the United States,
and trade receivables originated in Europe and Japan. The securiti-
zation programs require that the underlying receivables meet certain
eligibility criteria, including concentration and aging limits.

The company continues to service the receivables. Servicing assets or
liabilities are not recognized because the company receives adequate
compensation to service the sold receivables.

The securitization arrangements include limited recourse provisions,
which are not material. Neither the buyers of the receivables nor the

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

investors in these transactions have recourse to assets other than the
transferred receivables.

A subordinated interest in each securitized portfolio is generally
retained by the company. The amount of the retained interests and
the costs of certain of the securitization arrangements vary with the
company’s credit rating and other factors. Under one of the agree-
ments the company is required to maintain compliance with various
covenants, including a maximum net-debt-to-capital ratio and a
minimum interest coverage ratio. The company was in compliance
with all covenants at December 31, 2006. If Baxter’s credit ratings on
senior unsecured debt declined to BBB- or Baa3 (i.e., a two-rating or
four-rating downgrade, depending upon the rating agency), the com-
pany would no longer be able to securitize new receivables under one
of its foreign securitization arrangements. This arrangement also
requires that the company post cash collateral in the event of a
specified unfavorable change in credit rating. The maximum potential
cash collateral, which was not required as of December 31, 2006, was
de minimus. However, any downgrade of credit ratings would not
impact previously securitized receivables.

The fair values of the retained interests are estimated taking into
consideration both historical experience and current projections with
respect to the transferred assets’
future credit losses. The key
assumptions used when estimating the fair values of the retained
interests include the discount rate (which generally averages approx-
imately 5%), the expected weighted-average life (which averages
approximately 1.5 years for lease receivables and 5 to 7 months
for trade receivables) and anticipated credit losses (which are
expected to be immaterial as a result of meeting the eligibility criteria
mentioned above). The subordinated interests retained in the trans-
ferred receivables are carried as assets in Baxter’s consolidated
balance sheets, and totaled $95 million at December 31, 2006
and $85 million at December 31, 2005. An immediate 10% and
20% adverse change in these assumptions would not have a material
impact on the fair value of the retained interests at December 31,
2006. These sensitivity analyses are hypothetical and should be used
with caution. Changes in fair value based on a 10% or 20% variation
in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the rela-
tionship of the change in each assumption to the change in fair value
may not be linear.

As detailed below, the securitization arrangements resulted in net
cash outflows of $123 million, $111 million and $162 million in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. A summary of the securitization
activity is as follows.

as of and for the years ended December 31
(in millions)

Sold receivables at beginning

of year

Proceeds from sales of receivables
Cash collections (remitted to the
owners of the receivables)

Foreign exchange
Sold receivables at end of year

2006

2005

2004

$ 451
1,405

594
1,418

742
1,395

(1,528)
20
$ 348

(1,529)
(32)
451

(1,557)
14
594

Credit losses, net of recoveries, relating to the retained interests, and
the net gains and losses relating to the sales of receivables were
immaterial for each year.

Concentrations of Risk
The company invests excess cash in certificates of deposit or money
market accounts and, where appropriate, diversifies the concentra-
tion of cash among different financial institutions. With respect to
financial instruments, where appropriate, the company has diversi-
fied its selection of counterparties, and has arranged collateralization
and master-netting agreements to minimize the risk of loss.

Foreign Currency and Interest Rate Risk Management
The company operates on a global basis, and is exposed to the risk
that its earnings, cash flows and shareholders’ equity could be
adversely impacted by foreign exchange and movements in interest
rates. The company’s hedging policy manages these risks based on
the company’s judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk,
opportunity and costs.

The company is primarily exposed to foreign currency risk related to
firm commitments, forecasted transactions and net assets denomi-
nated in the Euro, Japanese Yen, British Pound and Swiss Franc. The
company manages its foreign currency exposures on a consolidated
basis, which allows the company to net exposures and take advan-
tage of any natural offsets. In addition, the company uses derivative
and nonderivative instruments to further reduce the exposure to
foreign exchange. Gains and losses on the hedging instruments offset
losses and gains on the hedged transactions to reduce the earnings
and shareholders’ equity volatility resulting from foreign exchange.

The company is also exposed to the risk that its earnings and cash
flows could be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates.
The company’s policy is to manage interest costs using a mix of fixed-
and floating-rate debt that the company believes is appropriate. To
manage this mix in a cost efficient manner, the company periodically

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

enters into interest rate swaps, in which the company agrees to
exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and
floating interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon
notional amount.

Cash Flow Hedges
The company uses forward and option contracts to hedge the foreign
exchange risk to earnings relating to firm commitments and forecasted
transactions denominated in foreign currencies. The company periodi-
cally uses forward-starting interest rate swaps and treasury rate locks to
hedge the risk to earnings associated with movements in interest rates
relating to anticipated issuances of debt. Certain other firm commitments
and forecasted transactions are also periodically hedged.

The following table summarizes net-of-tax activity in AOCI, a component
of shareholders’ equity, related to the company’s cash flow hedges.

as of and for the years ended December 31
(in millions)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

2006

2005

2004

balance at beginning of year

$(28)

$(91)

$(138)

Net loss in fair value of derivatives during

the year

(65)

(1)

(47)

Net loss reclassified to earnings during

the year

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

balance at end of year

$ (9)

$(28)

$ (91)

As of December 31, 2006, $2 million of deferred net after-tax losses
on derivative instruments included in AOCI are expected to be rec-
ognized in earnings during the next 12 months, coinciding with when
the hedged items are expected to impact earnings.

During 2004, certain foreign currency derivatives were no longer
classified as hedges and were discontinued due to changes in the
company’s anticipated net exposures. Due to the probability that
originally forecasted sales would no longer occur, the related deferred
hedge loss of $17 million ($10 million on a net-of-tax basis) was
reclassified from AOCI (included in the table above) to cost of goods
sold. Discontinued hedges were not significant in 2006 and 2005.

The maximum term over which the company has cash flow hedge
contracts for forecasted transactions at December 31, 2006 is one
year.

Fair Value Hedges
The company uses interest rate swaps to convert a portion of its fixed-
rate debt into variable-rate debt. These instruments hedge the com-
pany’s earnings from fluctuations in interest rates. No portion of the
change in fair value of the company’s fair value hedges was ineffec-
tive during the three years ended December 31, 2006.

Hedges of Net Investments in Foreign Operations
The company historically hedged the net assets of certain of its
foreign operations using a combination of foreign currency denom-
inated debt and cross-currency swaps. The cross-currency swaps have
served as effective hedges for accounting purposes and have reduced
volatility in the company’s shareholders’ equity balance and net-
debt-to-capital ratio (as any increase or decrease in the fair value of
the swaps relating to changes in spot currency exchange rates is
offset by the change in value of the hedged net assets of the foreign
operations relating to changes in spot currency exchange rates). The
net after-tax (losses) gains related to derivative and nonderivative net
investment hedge instruments recorded in AOCI were ($93) million,
$101 million, and ($171) million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.

In 2004, the company reevaluated its net investment hedge strategy
and decided to reduce the use of these instruments as a risk man-
agement tool. In order to reduce financial risk and uncertainty through
the maturity (or cash settlement) dates of the cross-currency swaps,
the company executed offsetting, or mirror, cross-currency swaps
relating to over half of the existing portfolio. As of the date of
execution, these mirror swaps effectively fixed the net amount that
the company will ultimately pay to settle the cross-currency swap
agreements subject to this strategy. After execution, as the market
value of the fixed portion of the original portfolio changes, the market
value of the mirror swaps changes by an approximately offsetting
amount, and vice versa. The mirror swaps will be settled when the
offsetting existing swaps are settled. The following is a summary, by
maturity date, of the mark-to-market liability position of the original
cross-currency swaps portfolio, the mirror swaps liability position,
and the total mark-to-market position as of December 31, 2006 (in
millions).

Maturity date

Swaps liability

Mirror swaps
liability

Total liability

2007
2008
2009
Total

$ 35
271
401
$707

$ 2
27
—
$29

$ 37
298
401
$736

Approximately $335 million, or 46%, of the total swaps liability of
$736 million as of December 31, 2006 has been fixed by the mirror
swaps.

In accordance with SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” when the cross-cur-
rency swaps are settled, the cash flows are reported within the
financing section of the consolidated statement of cash flows. When

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

the mirror swaps are settled, the cash flows are reported in the
operating section of the consolidated statement of cash flows. Of
the $379 million of net settlement payments in 2005, $432 million of
cash outflows were included in the financing section and $53 million
of cash inflows were included in the operating section. The entire
$40 million in settlement payments in 2004 were included in the
financing section of the statement of cash flows.

The total swaps net liability increased from $645 million at Decem-
ber 31, 2005 to $736 million at December 31, 2006 due to move-
ments in the foreign currency rate.

Other Foreign Currency Hedges
The company uses forward contracts and options to hedge earnings
from the effects of foreign exchange relating to certain of the compa-
ny’s intercompany and third-party receivables and payables denom-
inated in a foreign currency. These derivative instruments are not
formally designated as hedges, and the change in fair value of the
instruments, which substantially offsets the change in book value of
the hedged items, is recorded directly to earnings.

Book Values and Fair Values of Financial Instruments

as of December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2006

2005

Book values

Approximate
fair values

Assets
Long-term insurance

receivables

Investments at cost
Foreign currency hedges

Liabilities
Short-term debt
Current maturities of
long-term debt and
lease obligations

Other long-term debt and

lease obligations

Foreign currency hedges
Interest rate hedges
Cross-currency swaps
Long-term litigation

53
13
29

69
20
45

141

48
13
29

66
20
45

141

177

783

177

788

2,567
60
26
736

2,414
75
19
645

2,539
60
26
736

2,409
75
19
645

liabilities

The estimated fair values of insurance receivables and long-term
litigation liabilities were computed by discounting the expected cash
flows based on currently available information, which in many cases
does not include final orders or settlement agreements. The approx-
imate fair values of other assets and liabilities are based on quoted
market prices, where available. The carrying values of all other

financial
instruments approximate their
short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.

fair values due to the

NOTE 7
COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK

Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Summary
The company has a number of stock-based employee compensation
plans, including stock option, stock purchase, restricted stock and
restricted stock unit (to be settled in stock) (RSU) plans. Refer to the
separate discussions below regarding the nature and terms of each of
these plans.

The company adopted SFAS No. 123-R effective January 1, 2006 using
the modified prospective method. Under this transition method, stock
compensation expense recognized in 2006 includes the following:

(a) Compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards
granted before January 1, 2006, but not yet vested as of January 1,
2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance
with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123); and

(b) Compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards
granted on or after January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair
value estimated in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123-R.

Prior to January 1, 2006, the company measured stock compensation
expense using the intrinsic value method of accounting in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations (APB
No. 25). Thus, expense was generally not recognized for the compa-
ny’s employee stock option and purchase plans, but expense was
recognized relating to the company’s restricted stock and RSU grants
and certain modifications to stock options. Results for prior periods
have not been restated.

Impact of Adoption of SFAS No. 123-R in 2006
Stock compensation expense measured in accordance with
SFAS No. 123-R totaled $94 million ($63 million on a net-of-tax
basis, or $0.10 per basic and diluted share) for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 123-R resulted in
increased expense of $77 million ($53 million on a net-of-tax basis,
or $0.08 per basic and diluted share), as compared to the stock
compensation expense that would have been recorded pursuant to
APB No. 25 (relating to RSU and restricted stock plans only). Approx-
imately $9 million and $15 million of pre-tax expense was recorded
under APB No. 25 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

Stock compensation expense is recorded at the corporate headquar-
ters level and is not allocated to the segments. Approximately three-
quarters of stock compensation expense is classified in marketing
and administrative expenses, with the remainder classified in cost of
goods sold and research and development expenses. Costs capital-
ized in the consolidated balance sheet during 2006 were not
significant.

Pro Forma Impact in 2005 and 2004
The following table shows net income and EPS had the company
applied the fair value method of accounting for stock compensation in
accordance with SFAS No. 123 during 2005 and 2004.

years ended December 31
(in millions, except per share data)

Net income, as reported
Add: Stock compensation expense included in

2005

2004

$ 956

$ 388

reported net income, net of tax

Deduct: Total stock compensation expense

determined under the fair value method, net
of tax

Pro forma net income

Basic EPS

As reported
Pro forma
Diluted EPS

As reported
Pro forma

(62)
$ 900

(96)
$ 305

$1.54
$1.45

$0.63
$0.50

$1.52
$1.43

$0.63
$0.49

Determination of Fair Value
Under both SFAS No. 123-R and the fair value method of accounting
under SFAS No. 123 (i.e., SFAS No. 123 Pro Forma), the fair value of
restricted stock and RSUs is determined based on the number of
shares granted and the quoted price of the company’s common stock
on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options is determined
using the Black-Scholes model. The weighted-average assumptions
used in estimating the fair value of stock options granted during the
period, along with the weighted-average grant date fair values, were
as follows.

years ended December 31

Expected volatility
Expected life (in years)
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Fair value per stock option

2006
(SFAS
No. 123-R)

2005
(SFAS
No. 123
Pro forma)

2004
(SFAS
No. 123
Pro forma)

28%
5.5
4.7%
1.5%
$11

37%
5.5
4.2%
1.7%
$12

39%
5.5
3.0%
2.0%
$10

Under SFAS No 123-R, the company’s expected volatility assumption
is based on an equal weighting of the historical volatility of Baxter’s
stock and the implied volatility from traded options on Baxter’s stock.
Under SFAS No. 123 Pro Forma, the company’s expected volatility
assumption was based on the historical volatility of Baxter’s stock.
The expected life assumption is primarily based on historical
employee exercise patterns and employee post-vesting termination
behavior. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option
is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
The dividend yield reflects historical experience as well as future
expectations over the expected term of the option.

Stock compensation expense recognized in 2006 is based on awards
expected to vest, and therefore has been reduced by estimated
forfeitures. SFAS No. 123-R requires forfeitures to be estimated at
the time of grant and revised in subsequent periods, if necessary, if
actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Under SFAS No. 123 Pro
Forma, the company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. The
cumulative effect of estimating future forfeitures in determining
expense, rather than recording forfeitures when they occur, was
immaterial.

Types of Stock Compensation Plans
In anticipation of the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the company did
not modify the terms of previously granted options. As part of an
overall, periodic reevaluation of the company’s stock compensation
programs, the company did make changes to its equity compensation
program relating to key employees beginning in the first quarter of
2005, reducing the overall number of options granted and utilizing a
mix of stock options and RSUs. As noted below, the company mod-
ified its employee stock purchase plans during 2005.

Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises, restricted stock
and RSU grants, and employee stock purchase plan purchases are
generally issued out of treasury stock. As of December 31, 2006,
approximately 23 million authorized shares are available for future
awards under the company’s stock-based compensation plans.

The following is a summary of the company’s stock compensation
plans.

Stock Option Plans Stock options are granted to employees and
non-employee directors with exercise prices at least equal to 100% of
the market value on the date of grant. Generally, employee stock
options vest 100% in three years from the grant date and have a
contractual term of 10 years. Stock options granted to non-employee
directors generally vest 100% one year from the grant date and have a
contractual term of 10 years. Expense is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

Stock option activity during 2006 was as follows.

Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term
(in years)

Aggregate
intrinsic
value

Weighted-
average
exercise
price

$37.32
38.62
28.95
38.60

Options

65,986
10,307
(7,937)
(5,804)

62,552

$38.48

5.8

$542,450

60,307

$38.52

5.7

$522,210

39,367

$40.32

4.3

$286,413

(options and
aggregate intrinsic
values in thousands)

Outstanding at

January 1, 2006

Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Outstanding at

December 31,
2006

Vested or expected
to vest as of
December 31,
2006

Exercisable at

December 31,
2006

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the dif-
ference between the exercise price and the company’s closing stock
price on the last trading day of the period. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised was $101 million, $64 million and $36 million in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

As of December 31, 2006, $109 million of pre-tax unrecognized
compensation cost related to stock options is expected to be recog-
nized as expense over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

The company grants restricted stock
Restricted Stock and RSU Plans
and RSUs to key employees, and grants restricted stock to non-
employee directors. Grants of RSUs were first made in 2005, and
principally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period. The
total grant-date fair value, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, is rec-
ognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

The following table summarizes nonvested restricted stock and RSU
activity for the year ended December 31, 2006.

(shares and share units in thousands)

Nonvested restricted stock and RSUs at

January 1, 2006

Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested restricted stock and RSUs at

Weighted-
average
grant-date
fair value

Shares or
share units

870
889
(258)
(206)

$34.98
39.10
34.78
36.22

December 31, 2006

1,295

$37.65

As of December 31, 2006, $29 million of pre-tax unrecognized com-
pensation cost related to restricted stock and RSUs is expected to be
recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 2 years.

Employee Stock Purchase Plans Nearly all employees are eligible to
participate in the company’s employee stock purchase plans. For
subscriptions that began prior to April 1, 2005, the employee pur-
chase price was the lower of 85% of the closing market price on the
date of subscription or 85% of the closing market price on the
purchase dates, as defined by the plans. For subscriptions that began
on or after April 1, 2005, the employee purchase price is 95% of the
closing market price on the purchase date, as defined by the plans.
The change to the employee stock purchase plan in 2005 was made
as part of an overall reassessment of employee benefits and in
contemplation of the new stock compensation accounting rules.

Under SFAS No. 123-R, no compensation expense is recognized for
subscriptions that began on or after April 1, 2005. Expense recog-
nized in 2006 and expected expense in the future relating to sub-
scriptions that began prior to April 1, 2005 is immaterial. During
2006, 2005 and 2004, the company issued 552,493, 1,124,062 and
2,896,506 shares, respectively, under these plans. The number of
shares under subscription at December 31, 2006 totaled approxi-
mately 220,000.

Other
Realized Income Tax Benefits and the Impact on the Statement of Cash
Flows SFAS No. 123-R changes the presentation of realized excess
tax benefits principally associated with stock option exercises in the
statement of cash flows. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, such
realized tax benefits were required to be presented as an inflow within
the operating section of the statement. Under SFAS No. 123-R, such
realized tax benefits are presented as an inflow within the financing
section of the statement. Excess tax benefits were $29 million,
$22 million and $16 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

for awards granted prior

The company’s stock options and RSUs
Special Vesting Provisions
provide that if the grantee retires and meets certain age and years of
service thresholds, the options or RSUs continue to vest for a period
of time after retirement as if the grantee continued to be an employee.
In these cases,
to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123-R, expense will be recognized for such awards over
the service period, and any unrecognized costs will be accelerated
into expense when the employee retires. For awards granted on or
after January 1, 2006, expense will be recognized over the period from
the grant date to the date the employee would no longer be required
to perform services to vest in the award. The difference between the
two accounting methods was not material for the three years ended
December 31, 2006.

Stock Repurchase Programs
As authorized by the board of directors, from time to time the com-
pany repurchases its stock on the open market in an effort to optimize
its capital structure depending upon the company’s cash flows, net
debt level and current market conditions. As of December 31, 2005,
$243 million was available under a stock purchase program previ-
ously authorized by the board of directors. In February 2006, the
board of directors authorized the repurchase of an additional $1.5 bil-
lion of the company’s common stock. During 2006, the company
repurchased 18 million shares for $737 million under these stock
repurchase programs. At December 31, 2006, $1.0 billion remained
available under the February 2006 authorization. No open-market
repurchases were made in 2005 or 2004. In 2004, stock repurchases
totaled $18 million, all of which were from Shared Investment Plan
participants in private transactions. Refer to Note 5 for information
regarding the Shared Investment Plan.

Issuances of Stock
Refer to Note 5 regarding the February 2006 issuance of approxi-
mately 35 million shares of common stock for $1.25 billion in con-
junction with the settlement of the purchase contracts included in the
company’s December 2002 issuance of equity units. The company
has been using these proceeds to pay down maturing debt, for stock
repurchases and for other general corporate purposes.

Common Stock Dividends
In November 2006, the board of directors declared an annual dividend
on the company’s common stock of $0.582 per share. The dividend,
which was paid on January 5, 2007 to shareholders of record as of
December 8, 2006, was a continuation of the prior annual rate. Begin-
ning in 2007, the company will convert to a quarterly, rather than
annual, dividend and increase its dividend. The first quarterly dividend
payment is payable on April 2, 2007 to shareholders of record as of
March 10, 2007.

Other
The board of directors is authorized to issue up to 100 million shares
of no par value preferred stock in series with varying terms as it
determines. In March 1999, common shareholders received a divi-
dend of one preferred stock purchase right (collectively, the Rights) for
each share of common stock. As a result of the two-for-one split of the
company’s common stock in May 2001, each outstanding share of
common stock is now accompanied by one-half of one Right. The
Rights may become exercisable at a specified time after (1) the
acquisition by a person or group of 15% or more of the company’s
common stock or (2) a tender or exchange offer for 15% or more of the
company’s common stock. Once exercisable, the holder of each Right
is entitled to purchase, upon payment of the exercise price, an
amount of shares of the company’s common stock the aggregate
market value of which equals two times the exercise price of the
Rights. The Rights have a current exercise price of $275. The Rights
expire on March 23, 2009, unless earlier redeemed by the company
under certain circumstances at a price of $0.01 per Right.

NOTE 8
RETIREMENT AND OTHER BENEFIT PROGRAMS

The company sponsors a number of qualified and nonqualified pen-
sion plans for its employees. The company also sponsors certain
unfunded contributory healthcare and life insurance benefits for
substantially all domestic retired employees.

Adoption of SFAS No. 158
The company adopted SFAS No. 158 on December 31, 2006. The new
standard requires companies to fully recognize the overfunded or
underfunded status of each of its defined benefit pension and other
postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans as an asset or liability in the
consolidated balance sheet. The asset or liability equals the differ-
ence between the fair value of the plan’s assets and its benefit
obligation. SFAS No. 158 has no impact on the amount of expense
recognized in the consolidated statement of income.

SFAS No. 158 is required to be adopted on a prospective basis.
Therefore, the company’s December 31, 2005 consolidated balance
sheet was not restated. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 was recorded
as an adjustment to assets and liabilities to reflect the plans’ funded
status (rather than a prepaid asset or accrued liability), with a cor-
responding decrease in AOCI, which is a component of shareholders’
equity. The net-of-tax decrease in AOCI at December 31, 2006 relating
to the adoption of SFAS No. 158 was $235 million. The impact of
adoption of SFAS No. 158 on individual line items in the company’s
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 (including related
deferred tax balances) was a decrease in the short-term deferred
income tax asset of $1 million, an increase in other long-term assets
of $90 million, a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

of $15 million, and an increase in other long-term liabilities of
$339 million.

The net total after-tax decrease in AOCI in 2006 relating to defined
benefit pension and OPEB plans was $83 million, consisting of a
net-of-tax increase in AOCI of $152 million relating to the adjustment
of the additional minimum pension liability for the year and the
above-mentioned decrease in AOCI of $235 million relating to the
adoption of SFAS No. 158.

In future years, unrecognized amounts included in AOCI at Decem-
ber 31, 2006 will be reclassified from AOCI to retained earnings as the
amounts are recognized in the consolidated income statement pur-
suant
to SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,”
SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtail-
ments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Bene-
fits,” and SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement
Benefits Other Than Pensions.” As noted above, SFAS No. 158 does
not change the amount of net pension and OPEB cost that is to be
recognized under SFAS Nos. 87, 88 and 106.

As required by SFAS No. 158, the assets associated with overfunded
plans are classified as noncurrent in the consolidated balance sheet.
Liabilities associated with underfunded plans are classified as non-
current, except to the extent the fair value of the plan’s assets is less
than the plan’s estimated benefit payments over the next 12 months.
In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 158 on December 31,
2006, the company made the required current and noncurrent reclas-
sifications in its consolidated balance sheet.

The company uses a September 30 measurement date for its pension
and OPEB plans. Effective no later than the year ending December 31,
2008, SFAS No. 158 requires that the measurement date be changed
to December 31, the company’s fiscal year-end.

Reconciliation of Pension and OPEB Plan Obligations, Assets and
Funded Status
The benefit plan information in the table below pertains to all of the
company’s pension and OPEB plans, both in the United States and in
foreign countries. As noted above, because the prior year consoli-
dated balance sheet was not
the adoption of
SFAS No. 158, the consolidated balance sheet amounts at the bottom
of the table below are not comparable between December 31, 2006
and December 31, 2005.

restated for

as of and for the years ended
December 31 (in millions)

Benefit obligations
Beginning of period
Service cost
Interest cost
Participant contributions
Actuarial loss (gain)
Benefit payments
Foreign exchange and other
End of period
Fair value of plan assets
Beginning of period
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Participant contributions
Benefit payments
Foreign exchange and other
End of period
Funded status
Funded status at end

of period

Unrecognized net losses
Fourth quarter contributions
and benefit payments
Net amount recognized at

Pension benefits

OPEB

2006

2005

2006

2005

$3,152
91
174
6
(126)
(124)
47
3,220

2,052
215
492
6
(124)
27
2,668

$ 2,838
81
160
6
239
(118)
(54)
3,152

$ 506
7
29
11
(9)
(33)
—
511

$ 563
7
28
10
(69)
(33)
—
506

1,739
289
155
6
(118)
(19)
2,052

—
—
22
11
(33)
—
—

—
—
23
10
(33)
—
—

(552)
—

(1,100)
1,386

(511)
—

(506)
126

428

December 31

$ (543)

714

$(505)

$(375)

Amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance
sheets

Noncurrent asset
Current liability
Noncurrent liability
Prepaid benefit cost
Accrued benefit liability
Additional minimum
pension liability

Intangible asset
Accumulated other

comprehensive loss

Net (liability) asset
recognized at
December 31

4
(23)
(524)
—
—

— $ — $ —
—
—
(25)
—
—
(480)
—
930
—
(375)
(216)
—

—
—

—

(1,131)
2

1,129

—
—

—

—
—

—

$ (543)

714

$(505)

$(375)

Accumulated Benefit Obligation
The pension obligation information in the table above represents the
projected benefit obligation (PBO). The PBO incorporates assump-
tions relating to future compensation levels. The accumulated benefit
obligation (ABO) is the same as the PBO except that it includes no

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

assumptions relating to future compensation levels. The ABO relating
to all of the company’s pension plans was $2.96 billion at the 2006
measurement date and $2.89 billion at the 2005 measurement date.

Funded Status for Individual Plans
The information in the funded status table above represents the totals
for all of the company’s pension plans. The following is information
relating to the individual plans in the funded status table above that
have an ABO in excess of plan assets.

(in millions)

ABO
Fair value of plan assets

2006

$2,646
2,311

2005

$2,825
1,981

The following is information relating to the individual plans in the
funded status table above that have a PBO in excess of plan assets
(most of which also have an ABO in excess of assets, and are
therefore also included in the table directly above).

(in millions)

PBO
Fair value of plan assets

2006

$3,215
2,659

2005

$3,147
2,044

Additional Minimum Pension Liability
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 158 and the related amendment to
SFAS No. 87, if the ABO relating to a pension plan exceeded the fair
value of the plan’s assets, the liability established for that pension
plan was required to be at least equal to that excess. The additional
minimum pension liability (AML) that was required to be recorded to
state the plan’s pension liability at this unfunded ABO amount was
charged directly to OCI. The net-of-tax reduction to OCI relating to AML
adjustments totaled $152 million, $3 million and $48 million for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These
entries had no impact on the company’s results of operations.

Because SFAS No. 158 requires that the full funded status of pension
plans be recorded in the consolidated balance sheet, the AML con-
cept no longer exists as of December 31, 2006. However, immediately
prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 158 on December 31, 2006, the
current year AML was required to be recognized.

Expected Net Pension and OPEB Plan Payments for the
Next 10 Years

(in millions)

2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012 through 2016

Total expected net benefit payments for

next 10 years

Pension
benefits

$ 129
140
154
165
190
1,197

$1,975

OPEB

$ 25
27
28
30
32
176

$318

The expected net benefit payments above reflect the company’s share
of the total net benefits expected to be paid from the plans’ assets
(for funded plans) or from the company’s assets (for unfunded plans).
The total expected OPEB benefit payments for the next ten years are
net of approximately $56 million of expected federal subsidies relat-
ing to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Moderniza-
tion Act, including $3 million, $4 million, $4 million, $5 million and
$5 million in each of the years 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011,
respectively.

Amounts Recognized in AOCI at December 31, 2006
As discussed above, with the adoption of SFAS No. 158 on Decem-
ber 31, 2006, the pension and OPEB plans’ gains or losses, prior
service costs or credits, and transition assets or obligations not yet
recognized in net periodic cost are recognized on a net-of-tax basis in
AOCI. These amounts will be subject to amortization in net periodic
benefit cost in the future. The following is a summary of the pre-tax
amounts included in AOCI at December 31, 2006.

(in millions)

Actuarial loss
Prior service cost (credit) and transition

obligation

Total amount recognized in AOCI at

December 31, 2006

Pension
benefits

OPEB

$1,126

$125

(13)

$1,131

$112

Amounts Expected to be Amortized From AOCI to Net Periodic
Benefit Cost in 2007

(in millions)

Actuarial loss
Prior service cost (credit) and transition obligation

Total amount expected to be amortized from AOCI

Pension
benefits

$96
1

OPEB

$ 7
(2)

to net pension and OPEB cost in 2007

$97

$ 5

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

Weighted-Average Assumptions Used in Determining Net Periodic
Benefit Cost

Pension benefits
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of net loss and other

$ 91
174
(199)

$ 81
160
(169)

$ 77
151
(187)

deferred amounts

117

Net periodic pension benefit cost

$ 183

$ 156

$ 103

OPEB
Service cost
Interest cost
Amortization of net loss and other

deferred amounts

Net periodic OPEB cost

7
29

7
28

9
29

$ 42

$ 40

$ 47

Weighted-Average Assumptions Used in Determining Benefit
Obligations at the Measurement Date

Discount rate
U.S. and Puerto Rico plans
International plans
Rate of compensation

increase

U.S. and Puerto Rico plans
International plans
Annual rate of increase in

the per-capita cost

Rate decreased to

by the year ended

Pension benefits

OPEB

2006

2005

2006

2005

6.00% 5.75% 6.00%
4.48% 4.12%
n/a

5.75%
n/a

4.50% 4.50%
3.64% 3.46%

n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a

9.00% 10.00%
5.00%
5.00%
2011
2011

The assumptions used in calculating the 2006 measurement date
benefit obligations will be used in the calculation of net periodic
benefit cost in 2007.

Pension benefits

OPEB

2006

2005

2004

2006

2005

2004

5.75% 5.75% 6.00% 5.75% 5.75% 6.00%
n/a
4.12% 5.12% 5.35%

n/a

8.50% 8.50% 10.00%
7.20% 6.92% 7.62%

n/a
n/a

4.50% 4.50% 4.50%
3.46% 3.44% 3.78%

n/a
n/a

n/a
n/a
n/a

n/a 10.00% 10.00% 10.00%
5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
n/a
2007
2010
n/a

2011

Discount rate
U.S. and Puerto Rico

plans

International plans
Expected return on

plan assets

U.S. and Puerto Rico

plans

International plans
Rate of compensation

increase

U.S. and Puerto Rico

plans

International plans
Annual rate of

increase in the
per-capita cost
Rate decreased to

by the year ended

Management establishes the expected return on plan assets assump-
tion primarily based on a review of historical compound average asset
returns, both company-specific and relating to the broad market
(based on the company’s asset allocation), as well as an analysis
of current market information and future expectations. Management
plans to continue to use an 8.5% assumption for its U.S. and Puerto
Rico plans for 2007.

Effect of a One-Percent Change in Assumed Healthcare Cost Trend
Rate on the OPEB Plan

One percent
increase

One percent
decrease

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2006

2005

Effect on total of service and interest
cost components of OPEB cost

Effect on OPEB obligation

$5
65

$5
70

$4
54

$4
58

Pension Plan Assets
An Investment Committee of members of senior management is
responsible for supervising, monitoring and evaluating the invested
assets of the company’s funded pension plans. The Investment
Committee, which meets at least quarterly, abides by documented
policies and procedures relating to investment goals, targeted asset
allocations, risk management practices, allowable and prohibited
investment holdings, diversification, use of derivatives, the relation-
ship between plan assets and benefit obligations, and other relevant
factors and considerations.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

The Investment Committee’s documented goals and guidelines
include the following.

• Ability to pay all benefits when due;

• Targeted long-term performance expectations relative to appli-
cable market indices, such as Standard & Poor’s, Russell, MSCI
EAFE, and other indices;

• Targeted asset allocation percentage ranges (summarized in the

table below), and periodic reviews of these allocations;

• Diversification of assets among third-party investment manag-
ers, and by geography, industry, stage of business cycle and
other measures;

• Specified investment holding and transaction prohibitions (for
example, private placements or other restricted securities, secu-
rities that are not traded in a sufficiently active market, short sales,
certain derivatives, commodities and margin transactions);

• Specified portfolio percentage limits on holdings in a single
corporate or other entity (generally 5%, except for holdings in
U.S. government or agency securities);

• Specified average credit quality for the fixed-income securities
portfolio (at least AA- by Standard & Poor’s or AA3 by Moody’s);

• Specified portfolio percentage limits on foreign holdings; and

• Periodic monitoring of investment manager performance and

adherence to the Investment Committee’s policies.

Pension Plan Asset Allocations

Allocation of
plan assets at
measurement
date

2006

68%

2005

81%

Target
allocation ranges

65% to 75%

Equity securities
Fixed-income securities and

other holdings

25% to 35%

32%

19%

Total

100% 100% 100%

Expected Pension and OPEB Plan Funding
The company’s funding policy for its pension plans is to contribute
amounts sufficient to meet legal funding requirements, plus any
additional amounts that management may determine to be appro-
priate considering the funded status of the plans, tax deductibility,
the cash flows generated by the company, and other factors. Cur-
rently, the company is not legally obligated to fund its principal plans
in the United States and Puerto Rico in 2007. The company

continually reassesses the amount and timing of any discretionary
contributions. The company expects to have net cash outflows relat-
ing to its OPEB plan of approximately $25 million in 2007.

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) was signed into law on
August 17, 2006. The company is in the process of analyzing the
legislation and the potential impact on the company’s future funding
to the U.S. plan. The U.S. Treasury Department is in the process of
developing implementation guidance for the PPA. It is likely that the
PPA will accelerate minimum funding requirements in the future.
However, the company does not expect that the legislation will have
a significant impact on the company’s required cash contributions
over the next few years because of the company’s recent contribu-
tions to its U.S. qualified plans.

Amendment to U.S. Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan and
Defined Contribution Plan
During 2006 the company amended its U.S. qualified defined benefit
pension plan and U.S. qualified defined contribution plan. Employees
hired on or after January 1, 2007 will receive a higher level of company
contributions in the defined contribution plan but will not be eligible
to participate in the pension plan. Employees hired prior to January 1,
2007 who were not fully vested in the pension plan as of Decem-
ber 31, 2006 were required to elect, by February 15, 2007, to either
continue their current participation in the pension and defined con-
tribution plans, or to cease to earn additional service in the pension
plan as of December 31, 2006 and participate in the higher level of
company contributions in the defined contribution plan. There was no
change to the plans for employees who were fully vested in the
pension plan as of December 31, 2006.

This amendment to the U.S. pension plan did not result in a curtail-
ment gain or loss. The amendment is expected to reduce future
pension cost as fewer employees will be covered by the plan, and
increase future expense associated with the defined contribution
plan due to the higher contribution for certain participants.

Defined Contribution Plan
Most U.S. employees are eligible to participate in a qualified defined
contribution plan. Company matching contributions relating to con-
tinuing operations were $23 million in 2006, $21 million in 2005 and
$22 million in 2004. Due to the change in the qualified pension plan
described above, the cost of the defined contribution plan is expected
to increase in the future.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

NOTE 9
INCOME TAXES

Income Before Income Tax Expense by Category

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

United States
International

$ 187
1,559

$ 346
1,098

$ 57
373

Income from continuing operations

before income taxes

$1,746

$1,444

$430

Income Tax Expense

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

Current

United States
Federal
State and local

International

Current income tax expense

Deferred

United States
Federal
State and local

International

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

$ 3
26
311

340

$ 75
(51)
261

$ 46
14
105

285

165

6
(5)
7

245
(37)
(7)

201

(139)
(23)
44

(118)

Income tax expense

$348

$486

$ 47

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

as of December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

Deferred tax assets
Accrued expenses
Retirement benefits
Alternative minimum tax credit
Tax credits and net operating losses
Asset basis differences
Other
Valuation allowances

Total deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities

Asset basis differences
Subsidiaries’ unremitted earnings
Other

Total deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax asset

$ 307
436
61
355
126
—
(234)

$ 207
392
76
828
—
25
(319)

1,051

1,209

—
81
—

264
37
—

301

$ 970

$ 908

At December 31, 2006, the company had U.S. operating loss carryfor-
wards totaling $23 million and foreign tax credit carryforwards total-
ing $22 million. The operating loss carryforwards expire between
2018 and 2020. The foreign tax credits will expire in 2015. At
December 31, 2006, the company had foreign net operating loss
carryforwards totaling $1.22 billion. Of this amount, $43 million
expires in 2007, $9 million expires in 2008, $245 million expires
in 2009, $179 million expires in 2010, $245 million expires in 2011,
$103 million expires in 2012, $71 million expires after 2012 and
$326 million has no expiration date. Realization of these operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards depends on generating sufficient
taxable income in future periods. A valuation allowance of $234 mil-
lion has been recorded at December 31, 2006 to reduce the deferred
tax assets associated with operating loss and tax credit carryfor-
wards, as well as amortizable assets in loss entities, because the
company does not believe it is more likely than not that these assets
will be fully realized prior to expiration.

The company will continue to evaluate the need for additional val-
uation allowances and, as circumstances change, the valuation
allowance may change.

Income Tax Expense Reconciliation

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

Income tax expense at U.S. statutory rate
Operations subject to tax incentives
State and local taxes
Foreign tax expense
Tax on repatriations of foreign earnings
Tax settlements
Restructuring and other special charges
Other factors

Income tax expense

$ 611 $ 505 $ 150
(174)
(271)
(17)
(57)
44
88
—
229
(55)
—
98
(12)
1
4

(263)
14
35
86
(135)
—
—

$ 348 $ 486 $ 47

The company recognized income tax expense of $86 million during
2006 relating to certain 2006 and prior earnings outside the United
States, which were not deemed indefinitely reinvested. Management
will continue to evaluate whether to indefinitely reinvest earnings in
certain foreign jurisdictions as it continues to analyze the company’s
global financial structure. Currently, aside from the items mentioned
above, management intends to continue to reinvest earnings in the
majority of jurisdictions outside of the United States for the foresee-
able future, and therefore has not recognized U.S.
income tax
expense on these earnings. U.S. federal and state income taxes,
net of applicable credits, on these foreign unremitted earnings of
$4.2 billion as of December 31, 2006, would be approximately
$905 million. As of December 31, 2005 the foreign unremitted
earnings and U.S. federal income tax amounts were $3.8 billion
and $323 million, respectively.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

Effective Income Tax Rate
The effective income tax rate was 20% in 2006, 34% in 2005 and 11% in
2004. Excluding any discrete items, management anticipates that the
effective income tax rate will be approximately 20.5% to 21.5% in 2007.

As detailed in the income tax expense reconciliation table above, the
company’s effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate
each year due to certain operations that are subject to tax incentives,
state and local taxes, and foreign taxes that are in excess of the
U.S. federal statutory rate. In addition, as discussed further below,
the company’s effective income tax rate can be impacted in any given
year by discrete factors or events.

2006
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the company reached a favorable
settlement with the Internal Revenue Service relating to the compa-
ny’s U.S. federal tax audits for the years 2002 through 2005, resulting
in a $135 million reduction of tax expense. In combination with this
settlement, the company reorganized its Puerto Rico manufacturing
assets and repatriated funds from other subsidiaries, resulting in tax
expense of $113 million ($86 million related to the repatriations and
$27 million included in the operations subject to tax incentives line in
the table above). The effect of these items was the utilization and
realization of deferred tax assets that were subject to valuation
allowances, as well as a modest reduction in the company’s reserves
for uncertain tax positions, resulting in a net $22 million benefit and
minimal cash impact.

2005
In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) was
enacted. The Act created a one-time incentive for U.S. corporations to
repatriate undistributed foreign earnings by providing an 85% divi-
dends received deduction. This allowed U.S. companies to repatriate
non-U.S. earnings through 2005 at a substantially reduced rate,
provided that certain criteria were met. During the fourth quarter of
2005 the company repatriated $2.1 billion in earnings previously
considered indefinitely reinvested outside the United States. The
company recorded income tax expense of $191 million associated
with this repatriation. In addition, the company recognized income tax
expense of $38 million relating to certain earnings outside the United
States, which were not deemed indefinitely reinvested, together
totaling the $229 million income tax on repatriations of foreign
earnings in the table above.

The effective tax rate for 2005 was also impacted by favorable
adjustments to restructuring charges, which are further discussed
in Note 4, and which were tax-effected at varying rates, depending on
the tax jurisdiction.

2004
The effective income tax rate in 2004 was impacted by favorable
settlements in certain jurisdictions around the world. As a result of
the completion of tax audits in 2004, $55 million of reserves for
matters previously under review were reversed into income. Also
impacting the effective tax rate was $289 million of special charges,
which are further discussed in Note 4, and which were tax-effected at
varying rates, depending on the tax jurisdiction.

Tax Incentives
The company has received tax incentives in Puerto Rico, Switzerland,
and certain other taxing jurisdictions outside the United States. The
financial impact of the reductions as compared to the U.S. federal
statutory rate is indicated in the table above. The tax reductions as
compared to the local statutory rate favorably impacted earnings per
diluted share by $0.29 in 2006, $0.32 in 2005 and $0.23 in 2004. The
Puerto Rico grant provides that the company’s manufacturing oper-
ations will be partially exempt from local taxes until the year 2013.
The Switzerland grant provides the company’s manufacturing oper-
ations will be partially exempt from local taxes until the year 2014.
The tax incentives in the other jurisdictions continue until at least
2007.

Examinations of Tax Returns
U.S. federal income tax returns filed by Baxter through December 31,
2005 have been examined and closed by the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice, with the exception of certain issues surrounding bilateral
Advance Pricing Agreement proceedings that the company voluntarily
initiated between the U.S. government and the governments of Swit-
zerland and Japan; however, these closed examinations could be re-
opened. As discussed in Note 1, the company records appropriate
reserves for any uncertain tax positions. The company has ongoing
audits in the United States (federal and state) and international
jurisdictions, including Brazil, France, Italy, Belgium and Japan. In
the opinion of management, the company has made adequate tax
provisions for all years subject to examination.

NOTE 10
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Baxter is involved in product liability, patent, shareholder, commer-
cial, and other legal proceedings that arise in the normal course of the
company’s business. The company records a liability when a loss is
considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If
the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range, and no amount
within the range is a better estimate, the minimum amount in the
range is accrued. If a loss is not probable or a probable loss cannot be
reasonably estimated, no liability is recorded.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

Baxter has established reserves for certain of the matters discussed
below. The company is not able to estimate the amount or range of
any loss for certain of the company’s legal contingencies for which
there is no reserve. While the liability of the company in connection
with the claims cannot be estimated with any certainty and although
the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters
could have a significant impact on the company’s results of opera-
tions for that period, the outcome of these legal proceedings is not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the company’s con-
solidated financial position. While the company believes that it has
valid defenses in these matters, litigation is inherently uncertain,
excessive verdicts do occur, and the company may in the future incur
material judgments or enter into material settlements of claims.

In addition to the matters described below, the company remains
subject to other additional potential administrative and legal actions.
With respect to regulatory matters in particular, these actions include
product recalls, injunctions to halt manufacture and distribution,
other restrictions on the company’s operations, civil sanctions,
including monetary sanctions, and criminal sanctions. Any of these
actions could have an adverse effect on the company’s business and
subject the company to additional regulatory actions and costly
litigation. With respect to patents, the company may be exposed to
significant litigation concerning patents and products, challenges to
the coverage and validity of the company’s patents on products or
processes, and allegations that the company’s products infringe
patents held by competitors or other third parties. A loss in any of
these types of cases could result in a loss of patent protection or the
ability to market products, which could lead to a significant loss of
sales, or otherwise materially affect future results of operations.

Patent Litigation
ADVATE Litigation
In April 2003, A. Nattermann & Cie GmbH and Aventis Behring L.L.C.
filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S.D.C. for the District of
Delaware naming Baxter Healthcare Corporation as the defendant. In
November 2003, the lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice. The
injunctive relief, alleged that Baxter’s
complaint, which sought
planned manufacture and sale of ADVATE would infringe U.S. Patent
No. 5,565,427. In October 2003, reexamination proceedings were
initiated in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. During these pro-
ceedings certain of the original claims were amended or rejected, and
new claims were added. On October 10, 2006, the Patent Office
issued a reexamination certificate and subsequently on October 16,
2006, Aventis Pharma S.A. again filed a patent infringement lawsuit
naming Baxter Healthcare Corporation as the defendant in the
U.S.D.C. for the District of Delaware.

Sevoflurane Litigation
In September 2005, the U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Illinois
ruled that a patent owned by Abbott Laboratories and the Central

Glass Company, U.S. Patent No. 5,990,176, was not infringed by Baxter’s
generic version of sevoflurane. Abbott and Central Glass appealed and
Baxter filed a cross-appeal as to the validity of the patent. In November
2006, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted Baxter’s cross-
appeal and held Abbott’s patent invalid. Abbott’s motions to have that
appeal re-heard were denied in January 2007.

Related actions are pending in various jurisdictions in the United
States and abroad. In February 2004, Abbott and Central Glass filed
another patent infringement action on two related patents against
Baxter in the U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Illinois. Baxter has
filed a motion asserting that judgment should be entered based on
the earlier case outcome. In May 2005, Abbott and Central Glass filed
suit in the Tokyo District Court on a counterpart Japanese patent and
in September 2006, the Tokyo District Court ruled in favor of Abbott
and Central Glass on this matter. Baxter has appealed this decision.
In June 2005, Baxter filed suit in the High Court of Justice in London,
England seeking revocation of the U.K. part of the related European
patent and a declaration of non-infringement. Trial in this action was
completed in November 2006 and a decision is expected in the first
half of 2007. Parallel opposition proceedings in the European and
Japanese Patent Offices seeking to revoke certain versions of the
patent are also pending.

GAMMAGARD Liquid Litigation
In June 2005, Talecris Biotherapeutics, Inc. filed a patent infringement
lawsuit in the U.S.D.C. for the District of Delaware naming Baxter
Healthcare Corporation as the defendant. The complaint, which seeks
injunctive relief, alleges that Baxter’s manufacture and sale of GAM-
MAGARD liquid infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,686,191. The case is
presently pending before the District Court with the trial scheduled
to commence in July 2007. Baxter filed a declaratory judgment action
in the High Court of Justice in London, England seeking to invalidate
the U.K. part of the related European patent and to receive a judgment
of non-infringement. In October 2006, Bayer AG (as patentee of the
European patent in the U.K.) and Talecris consented in the High Court
to a decision of invalidity of the U.K. part of the European patent.
Baxter has also filed a corresponding action in Belgium. A parallel
opposition proceeding in the European Patent Office is also pending.

Peritoneal Dialysis Litigation
On October 16, 2006, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Deka Prod-
ucts Limited Partnership filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the
U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Texas against Fresenius Medical
Care Holdings, Inc. and Fresenius USA, Inc. The complaint alleges that
Fresenius’s sale of the Liberty Cycler peritoneal dialysis systems and
related disposable items and equipment
infringes U.S. Patent
No. 5,421,823, as to which Deka has granted Baxter an exclusive
license in the peritoneal dialysis field. The case has been transferred
to the U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of California.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

ALYX Component Collection System Litigation
In December 2005, Haemonetics Corporation filed a patent infringe-
ment lawsuit in the U.S.D.C. for the District of Massachusetts naming
Baxter Healthcare Corporation as a defendant. The complaint, which
seeks injunctive relief, alleges that Baxter’s ALYX Component Collec-
tion System infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,705,983. A scheduling order
has been set and trial is expected in 2008.

In addition, Haemonetics filed a demand for arbitration in December
2005 against Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Baxter Healthcare S.A.,
and Baxter International Inc. with the American Arbitration Associa-
tion in Boston, Massachusetts. The demand alleges that the Baxter
parties breached their obligations under the parties’ technology
development agreement related to pathogen inactivation. In January
2007, Baxter reached a settlement with Haemonetics resolving this
matter, which was within the company’s reserve level and did not
require a material payment from Baxter.

Product Liability
Mammary Implant Litigation
The company is currently a defendant in various courts in a number of
lawsuits seeking damages for injuries of various types allegedly
caused by silicone mammary implants previously manufactured by
the Heyer-Schulte division of American Hospital Supply Corporation
(AHSC). AHSC, which was acquired by Baxter in 1985, divested its
Heyer-Schulte division in 1984. The majority of the claims and law-
suits against the company have been resolved. After concluding a
class action settlement with a large group of U.S. claimants, the
company will continue to participate in the resolution of class mem-
ber claims, for which reserves have been established, until 2010. In
addition, as of December 31, 2006, Baxter remains a defendant or co-
defendant
in approximately 30 lawsuits relating to mammary
implants brought by claimants who have opted out of, or are not
bound by, the class settlement. The company has also established
reserves for these lawsuits. Baxter believes that a substantial portion
of its liability and defense costs for mammary implant litigation may
be covered by insurance, subject to self-insurance retentions, exclu-
sions, conditions, coverage gaps, policy limits and insurer insolvency.

After concluding a class action settlement with a group of U.S. claim-
ants for whom all eligible claims have been paid, Baxter remained as
a defendant in approximately 95 lawsuits and subject to approxi-
mately 125 additional claims. Among the lawsuits, the company and
other manufacturers have been named as defendants in approxi-
mately 70 lawsuits pending or expected to be transferred to the
U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of claimants,
who are primarily non-U.S. residents, seeking unspecified damages
for HIV or Hepatitis C infections from their use of plasma-based factor
concentrates. In March 2005, the District Court denied plaintiff’s
motion to certify purported classes. Thereafter, plaintiffs have filed
additional lawsuits on behalf of individual claimants outside of the
U.S. In December 2005, the District Court granted defendants’ motion
to return U.K. claimants to their home jurisdiction. That matter is on
appeal.

In addition, through its 1996 acquisition of Immuno International AG
(Immuno), the company has unsettled claims and lawsuits for dam-
ages for injuries allegedly caused by Immuno’s plasma-based ther-
apies. The typical claim alleges that the individual with hemophilia
was infected with HIV or Hepatitis C by factor concentrates. Addition-
ally, the company has received notice of a number of claims arising
from Immuno’s vaccines and other biologically derived therapies.

The company believes that a substantial portion of the liability and
defense costs related to its plasma-based therapies litigation may be
covered by insurance, subject to self-insurance retentions, exclu-
sions, conditions, coverage gaps, policy limits and insurer insolvency.

Althane Dialyzers Litigation
Baxter was named as a defendant in a number of civil cases seeking
unspecified damages for alleged injury or death from exposure to
Baxter’s Althane series of dialyzers, which were withdrawn from the
market in 2001. All of these suits have been resolved. The Spanish
Ministry of Health has previously raised a claim, but a suit has not
been filed. Currently, the U.S. government is investigating Baxter’s
withdrawal of the dialyzers from the market. In December 2002,
Baxter received a subpoena to provide documents to the U.S. Depart-
ment of Justice and has cooperated fully with the investigation.

Plasma-Based Therapies Litigation
Baxter currently is a defendant in a number of lawsuits and subject to
additional claims brought by individuals who have hemophilia and
their families, all seeking damages for injuries allegedly caused by
anti-hemophilic factor concentrates VIII or IX derived from human
blood plasma (factor concentrates) processed by the company from
the late 1970s to the mid-1980s. The typical case or claim alleges that
the individual was infected with the HIV virus by factor concentrates
that contained the HIV virus. None of these cases involves factor
concentrates currently processed by the company.

Vaccines Litigation
As of December 31, 2006, the company has been named as a
defendant, along with others, in approximately 125 lawsuits filed
in various state and U.S. federal courts, seeking damages, injunctive
relief and medical monitoring for claimants alleged to have con-
tracted autism or attention deficit disorders as a result of exposure
to vaccines for childhood diseases containing the preservative,
thimerosal. These vaccines were formerly manufactured and sold
by North American Vaccine, Inc., which was acquired by Baxter in
June 2000, as well as by other companies.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

Securities Laws
In August 2002, six purported class action lawsuits were filed in the
U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Illinois naming Baxter and its then
Chief Executive Officer and then Chief Financial Officer as defendants.
These lawsuits, which were consolidated, alleged that the defendants
violated the federal securities laws by making misleading statements
regarding the company’s financial guidance that allegedly caused
Baxter common stock to trade at inflated levels. The Court of Appeals
for the Seventh Circuit reversed a trial court order granting Baxter’s
motion to dismiss the complaint and the U.S. Supreme Court declined
to grant certiorari in March 2005. In February 2006, the trial court
denied Baxter’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The court twice
has denied Plaintiffs’ request for certification of a class action based
on the inadequacy of their class representatives, but allowed Plain-
tiffs a final chance to find new ones. In October 2006, separate
plaintiffs’ law firms identified new, different proposed class repre-
sentatives, but in January 2007, the trial court found both new
proposed class representatives to be inadequate, effectively ending
the suit as a class action. In October 2004, a purported class action
was filed in the same court against Baxter and its current Chief
Executive Officer and then current Chief Financial Officer and their
predecessors for alleged violations of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Plaintiff alleges that these
defendants, along with the Administrative and Investment Commit-
tees of the company’s 401(k) plans, breached their fiduciary duties to
the plan participants by offering Baxter common stock as an invest-
ment option in each of the plans during the period of January 2001 to
October 2004. Plaintiff alleges that Baxter common stock traded at
artificially inflated prices during this period and seeks unspecified
damages and declaratory and equitable relief. In March 2006, the trial
court certified a class of plan participants who elected to acquire
Baxter common stock through the plans between January 2001 and
the present. The court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss but has
allowed Baxter to seek an interlocutory appeal of the decision, which
Baxter has done. Discovery has begun in this matter.

In July 2004, a series of four purported class action lawsuits, now
consolidated, were filed in the U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of
Illinois, in connection with the company’s restatement of its consol-
idated financial statements, previously announced in July 2004,
naming Baxter and its current Chief Executive Officer and then current
Chief Financial Officer and their predecessors as defendants. The
lawsuits allege that the defendants violated the federal securities
laws by making false and misleading statements regarding the
company’s financial results, which allegedly caused Baxter common
stock to trade at inflated levels during the period between April 2001
and July 2004. As of December 2005, the District Court had dismissed
the last of the remaining actions. The matter is on appeal. In August
and September 2004, three plaintiffs raised similar allegations based
on breach of fiduciary duty in separate derivative actions filed against
members of the company’s management and directors and consolidated

in the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois. The Circuit Court dismissed
those claims in December 2005 on defendants’ motion, and the time for
the plaintiffs to appeal has expired. One of the plaintiffs thereafter sent to
the company’s board of directors a letter demanding that the company
take action to recover sums paid to certain directors and employees,
which demand the board of directors has taken under advisement.

Other
On August 11, 2006, Genetics Institute, LLC, a subsidiary of Wyeth
Corporation, filed a lawsuit in Delaware Chancery Court seeking
damages and injunctive relief to compel the company to produce
and sell RECOMBINATE made from the bulk recombinant factor VIII
that had been manufactured by Genetics Institute and purchased by
the company pursuant to a now-terminated 2001 supply agreement
between the parties, and to pay Genetics Institute a portion of the
profits that would be realized from sales of RECOMBINATE made from
such bulk. In January 2007, the parties resolved this matter pursuant
to terms facilitating the sale of the factor VIII inventory.

On October 12, 2005 the United States filed a complaint in the
U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Illinois to affect the seizure of
COLLEAGUE and SYNDEO pumps that were on hold in Northern Illi-
nois. Customer-owned pumps were not affected. On June 29, 2006,
Baxter Healthcare Corporation, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of
Baxter, entered into a Consent Decree for Condemnation and Perma-
nent Injunction with the United States to resolve this seizure litiga-
tion. The Consent Decree also outlines the steps the company must
take to resume sales of new pumps in the United States. Additional
third party claims may be filed in connection with the COLLEAGUE
matter.

The company is a defendant, along with others, in over 50 lawsuits
brought in various state and U.S. federal courts, which allege that
Baxter and other defendants reported artificially inflated average
wholesale prices for Medicare and Medicaid eligible drugs. These
cases have been brought by private parties on behalf of various
purported classes of purchasers of Medicare and Medicaid eligible
drugs, as well as by state attorneys general. A number of these cases
were consolidated in the U.S.D.C. for the District of Massachusetts for
pretrial case management under Multi District Litigation rules. The
lawsuits against Baxter include a number of cases brought by state
attorneys general and New York entities, which seek unspecified
damages, injunctive relief, civil penalties, disgorgement, forfeiture
and restitution. In June 2006, Baxter settled the claims brought by the
Texas Attorney General related to the unique requirements of the
Texas reimbursement system. Various state and federal agencies are
conducting civil investigations into the marketing and pricing prac-
tices of Baxter and others with respect to Medicare and Medicaid
reimbursement. These investigations may result in additional cases
being filed by various state attorneys general.

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

NOTE 11
SEGMENT INFORMATION

Baxter operates in three segments, each of which is a strategic
business that is managed separately because each business devel-
ops, manufactures and sells distinct products and services. The
segments and a description of their products and services are as
follows:

The BioScience business is a manufacturer of plasma-based and
recombinant proteins used to treat hemophilia. Other products
include plasma-based therapies to treat immune disorders, alpha
1-antitrypsin deficiency and other chronic blood-related conditions;
albumin, used to treat burns and shock; products for regenerative
medicine, such as proteins used in hemostasis, wound-sealing and
tissue regeneration, and products used in adult stem-cell therapies;
and vaccines. In addition, the business manufactures manual and
automated blood and blood-component separation and collection
systems (the Transfusion Therapies business). Refer to Note 3 regard-
ing the company’s October 2, 2006 agreement to sell substantially all
of the assets and liabilities of the Transfusion Therapies business.

The Medication Delivery business is a manufacturer of products used
to deliver fluids and drugs to patients. These include intravenous
(IV) solutions and administration sets, pre-mixed drugs and drug-
reconstitution systems, pre-filled vials and syringes for injectable
drugs, and electronic infusion devices. The business also provides IV
nutrition products, inhalation anesthetics for general anesthesia,
contract manufacturing services, and drug formulation and packaging
technologies.

The Renal business is a manufacturer of products for peritoneal
dialysis (PD), a home therapy for people with irreversible kidney
failure who require renal
therapy. These products
replacement
include PD solutions and related supplies to help patients manually
perform solution exchanges, as well as automated PD cyclers that
provide therapy to patients overnight. The business also distributes
products for hemodialysis, which is generally conducted in a hospital
or clinic.

The company uses more than one measurement and multiple views of
data to measure segment performance and to allocate resources to
the segments. However, the dominant measurements are consistent
with the company’s consolidated financial statements and, accord-
ingly, are reported on the same basis herein. The company evaluates
the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them
primarily based on pre-tax income along with cash flows and overall
economic returns. Intersegment sales are generally accounted for at
amounts comparable to sales to unaffiliated customers, and are
eliminated in consolidation. The accounting policies of the segments
are substantially the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies in Note 1.

Certain items are maintained at the corporate level (Corporate) and
are not allocated to the segments. They primarily include most of the
company’s debt and cash and equivalents and related net interest
expense, corporate headquarters costs, certain non-strategic invest-
ments and related income and expense, certain nonrecurring gains
and losses, certain special charges (such as restructuring and certain
asset impairments), deferred income taxes, certain foreign currency
fluctuations, certain employee benefit plan costs, stock compensa-
tion, the majority of the foreign currency and interest rate hedging
activities, and certain litigation liabilities and related insurance
receivables. With respect to depreciation and amortization and
expenditures for long-lived assets, the difference between the seg-
ment totals and the consolidated totals principally relate to assets
maintained at Corporate.

The special charges in 2006 and 2005 relating to infusion pumps are
reflected in the Medication Delivery segment’s pre-tax income in the
table below. The special charge in 2005 relating to hemodialysis
instruments is reflected in the Renal segment’s pre-tax income in the
table below. Refer to Note 4 for further information.

Segment Information

as of and for the years
ended December 31
(in millions)

2006
Net sales
Depreciation and
amortization

Pre-tax income (loss)
Assets
Capital expenditures

2005
Net sales
Depreciation and
amortization

Pre-tax income (loss)
Assets
Capital expenditures

2004
Net sales
Depreciation and
amortization

Pre-tax income (loss)
Assets
Capital expenditures

BioScience

Medication
Delivery

Renal

Other

Total

$4,396

$3,917 $2,065 $

— $10,378

181
1,473
4,194
129

219
559
4,599
244

122
368
1,541
106

53
(654)
4,352
47

575
1,746
14,686
526

$3,852

$3,990 $2,007 $

— $ 9,849

179
1,012
4,112
141

215
588
4,279
184

119
324
1,569
93

67
(480)
2,767
26

580
1,444
12,727
444

$3,504

$4,047 $1,958 $

— $ 9,509

184
711
4,557
169

209
751
4,421
236

116
361
1,815
122

92
(1,393)
3,354
31

601
430
14,147
558

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

as of December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

Total assets
United States
Europe
Latin America
Japan
Canada
Asia & other countries
Consolidated total assets

$ 7,121
5,051
1,292
253
183
786
$14,686

$ 5,714
4,535
1,130
269
163
916
$12,727

$ 5,984
5,641
1,153
327
177
865
$14,147

as of December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

PP&E, net
United States
Austria
Other countries
Consolidated PP&E, net

$1,747
502
1,980
$4,229

$1,826
457
1,861
$4,144

$2,145
517
1,707
$4,369

Significant Product Sales
The following is a summary of net sales as a percentage of consol-
idated net sales for the company’s principal product lines.

years ended December 31

Recombinants
Plasma Proteins1
Peritoneal Dialysis Therapies
IV Therapies2
Anesthesia and Injectable

2006

16%
8%
16%
12%

2005

16%
10%
16%
12%

2004

14%
11%
15%
12%

Drugs

10%

11%

1 Includes plasma-derived hemophilia (FVII, FVIII, FIX and FEIBA),
albumin and other plasma-based products. Excludes antibody
therapies.

2 Principally includes intravenous solutions and nutritional products.

Pre-Tax Income Reconciliation

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

Total pre-tax income from segments

$2,400

$1,924

$1,823

Unallocated amounts

Restructuring income (charges)
Net interest expense
Certain foreign exchange

fluctuations and hedging
activities

Other special charges
Costs relating to early

extinguishment of debt

Stock compensation
Other Corporate items

Consolidated income from

continuing operations before
income taxes

—
(34)

109
(118)

(543)
(99)

(41)
—

—
(94)
(485)

(82)
—

(17)
(9)
(363)

(103)
(289)

—
(15)
(344)

$1,746

$1,444

$ 430

Assets Reconciliation

as of December 31 (in millions)

Total segment assets

Cash and equivalents
Deferred income taxes
Insurance receivables
PP&E, net
Other Corporate assets
Consolidated total assets

2006

2005

$10,334 $ 9,960
841
1,039
96
249
542
$14,686 $12,727

2,485
1,167
79
245
376

Geographic Information
Net sales are based on product shipment destination and assets are
based on physical location.

years ended December 31 (in millions)

2006

2005

2004

Net sales
United States
Europe
Latin America
Japan
Canada
Asia & other countries
Consolidated net sales

$ 4,589
3,255
806
372
373
983
$10,378

$4,383
3,096
771
417
338
844
$9,849

$4,460
2,846
672
415
297
819
$9,509

N OT E S t o C O N S O L I DAT E D F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S

NOTE 12
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS AND MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S STOCK (UNAUDITED)

years ended December 31 (in millions, except per share data)

First
quarter

Second
quarter

Third
quarter

Fourth
quarter

2006
Net sales
Gross profit
Income from continuing operations1
Net income1
Per common share

Income from continuing operations1

Basic
Diluted
Net income1
Basic
Diluted

Dividends declared
Market price

High
Low

2005
Net sales
Gross profit
Income from continuing operations2
Net income2
Per common share

Income from continuing operations2

Basic
Diluted
Net income2
Basic
Diluted
Dividends declared

Market price

High
Low

$2,409
1,052
282
282

$2,649
1,155
309
309

$2,557
1,215
374
374

0.44
0.43

0.44
0.43
—

0.47
0.47

0.47
0.47
—

0.58
0.57

0.58
0.57
—

39.43
35.45

38.93
36.24

45.56
36.43

$2,383
969
224
226

$2,577
1,036
324
322

$2,398
1,009
116
116

0.36
0.36

0.37
0.36
—

0.52
0.51

0.52
0.51
—

0.19
0.18

0.19
0.18
—

36.24
33.37

38.00
33.73

40.95
37.08

$2,763
1,315
433
431

0.66
0.66

0.66
0.66
0.582

47.21
43.56

$2,491
1,079
294
292

0.47
0.46

0.47
0.46
0.582

40.04
36.59

Full year

$10,378
4,737
1,398
1,397

2.15
2.13

2.15
2.13
0.582

47.21
35.45

$ 9,849
4,093
958
956

1.54
1.52

1.54
1.52
0.582

40.95
33.37

1 The second quarter of 2006 includes a $76 million pre-tax charge relating to the Medication Delivery segment’s COLLEAGUE and SYNDEO

infusion pumps. Refer to Note 4 for further information.

2 The second and fourth quarters of 2005 include $77 million and $49 million, respectively, of pre-tax charges relating to certain Medication

Delivery segment infusion pumps.

The third and fourth quarters of 2005 includes $28 million and $22 million, respectively, of pre-tax charges associated with the Renal segment’s
discontinuance of the manufacturing of hemodialysis instruments.

The second and third quarters of 2005 include $104 million and $5 million, respectively, of pre-tax benefits relating to the adjustment of the
company’s restructuring reserves.

Refer to Note 4 for further information.

Baxter common stock is listed on the New York, Chicago and SWX Swiss stock exchanges. The New York Stock Exchange is the principal market on
which the company’s common stock is traded. At January 31, 2007, there were 49,801 holders of record of the company’s common stock.

D I R E C TO R S a n d O F F I C E R S

Board of Directors
Walter E. Boomer
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Rogers Corporation

Blake E. Devitt
Former Senior Audit Partner and Director,
Pharmaceutical and Medical Device
Industry Practice
Ernst & Young LLP

John D. Forsyth
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield

Gail D. Fosler
Executive Vice President and Chief Economist
The Conference Board

James R. Gavin III, M.D., Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
MicroIslet, Inc.

Peter S. Hellman
President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
Nordson Corporation

Joseph B. Martin, M.D., Ph.D.
Dean of the Faculty of Medicine
Harvard Medical School

Robert L. Parkinson, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Baxter International Inc.

Carole J. Shapazian
Former Executive Vice President
Maytag Corporation

Thomas T. Stallkamp
Industrial Partner
Ripplewood Holdings L.L.C.

Kees J. Storm
Former Chairman of the Executive Board
AEGON N.V. (The Netherlands)

Albert P.L. Stroucken
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Owens-Illinois, Inc.

Executive Management
Joy A. Amundson*
President, BioScience

Peter J. Arduini*
President, Medication Delivery

Michael J. Baughman
Controller

Robert M. Davis*
Chief Financial Officer

J. Michael Gatling*
Vice President, Global Manufacturing Operations

John J. Greisch*
President, International

Robert J. Hombach
Treasurer

Gerald Lema
President, Asia Pacific

Susan R. Lichtenstein*
General Counsel

Jeanne K. Mason*
Vice President, Human Resources

Bruce H. McGillivray*
President, Renal

Peter Nicklin
President, Europe

Robert L. Parkinson, Jr.*
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Norbert G. Riedel, Ph.D.*
Chief Scientific Officer

David P. Scharf
Corporate Secretary

Karenann K. Terrell*
Chief Information Officer

Cheryl L. White*
Vice President, Quality

* executive officer

C O M PA N Y I N F O R M AT I O N

Corporate Headquarters
Baxter International Inc.
One Baxter Parkway
Deerfield, IL 60015-4633
Telephone: (847) 948-2000
Website: www.baxter.com

Stock Exchange Listings
The New York Stock Exchange is the principal market on which the
company’s common stock is traded (Ticker Symbol: BAX).
Baxter International Inc. common stock is also listed on the Chicago
and SWX Swiss stock exchanges.

Annual Meeting
The 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Tuesday,
May 1, at 10:30 a.m. at the Chicago Cultural Center, located at 78
East Washington in Chicago, Illinois.

Transfer Agent and Registrar
Correspondence concerning Baxter International Inc. common stock
holdings, lost or missing certificates or dividend checks, duplicate
mailing or changes of address should be directed to:

Baxter International Inc. Common Stock
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43069
Providence, RI 02940-3069
Telephone: (888) 359-8645
Hearing Impaired Telephone: (800) 952-9245
Website: www.computershare.com

Correspondence concerning Baxter International Inc. Contingent Pay-
ment Rights related to the 1998 acquisition of Somatogen, Inc.
should be directed to:

U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Telephone: (651) 495-3909

Dividend Reinvestment
The company offers an automatic dividend-reinvestment program to
all holders of Baxter International Inc. common stock. Information is
available upon request from:

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43081
Providence, RI 02940-3081
Telephone: (888) 359-8645
Website: www.computershare.com

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chicago, IL

Information Resources
Please visit Baxter’s website for information on the company and its
products and services.

Information regarding corporate governance at Baxter, including
Baxter’s corporate governance guidelines, global business practice
standards, and the charters for the committees of Baxter’s board of
directors, is available on Baxter’s website at www.baxter.com under
“Corporate Governance” and in print upon request by writing to
Baxter International Inc., Corporate Secretary, One Baxter Parkway,
Deerfield, Illinois 60015-4633.

Shareholders may elect to view proxy materials and annual reports
online via the Internet instead of receiving them by mail. To sign up
for this service, please go to www.econsent.com/bax. When the next
proxy materials and annual report are available, you will be sent an
e-mail message with a proxy control number and a link to a website
where you can cast your vote online. Once you provide your consent
to receive electronic delivery of proxy materials via the Internet, your
consent will remain in effect until you revoke it.

Registered shareholders may also access personal account informa-
tion online via the Internet by visiting www.computershare.com and
selecting the “Account Access” menu.

Investor Relations
Securities analysts, investment professionals and investors seeking
additional investor information should contact:

Mary Kay Ladone
Vice President, Investor Relations Manager, Investor Relations
Telephone: (847) 948-3085
Telephone: (847) 948-3371
Fax: (847) 948-4498
Fax: (847) 948-4498

Clare Trachtman

Customer Inquiries
Customers who would like general information about Baxter’s prod-
ucts and services may call the Center for One Baxter toll free in the
United States at (800) 422-9837 or by dialing (847) 948-4770.

Form 10-K and Other Reports
A paper copy of the company’s Form 10-K for the year ended Decem-
ber 31, 2006, may be obtained without charge by writing to Baxter
International Inc., Investor Relations, One Baxter Parkway, Deerfield,
IL 60015-4633. A copy of the company’s Form 10-K and other filings
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may be
obtained from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or the company’s
website at www.baxter.com

Baxter has filed certifications of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer regarding the quality of the company’s public dis-
closure as exhibits to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006. Baxter’s Chief Executive Officer also has
submitted to the New York Stock Exchange an annual certification
stating that he is not aware of any violation by the company of the
New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards.

ADVATE, ALYX, AMICUS, ARALAST, AVIVA, BAXJECT, Baxter, COL-
LEAGUE, EPOMAX, EXTRANEAL, FEIBA, FLEXBUMIN, FLOSEAL, FORANE,
GAMMAGARD, HEMOFIL, HOMECHOICE, HYLENEX, ISOLEX, KIOVIG,
Neis Vac-C, NUTRINEAL, PHYSIONEAL, PLASMA-VAC, PreFluCel, PRO-
MAXX, RECOMBINATE, SUPRANE, SYNDEO, TISSEEL, XENIUM and
6060 are trademarks of Baxter International Inc. and its affiliates.
Other company, product and service names may be trademarks or
service marks of others.

Printed on Recycled Paper

F I V E - Y E A R S U M M A RY o f S E L E C T E D F I N A N C I A L DATA

as of or for the years ended December 31

20061,6

20052,6

20043,6

20034,6

20025,6

Operating Results
(in millions)

Net sales
Income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of accounting changes

Depreciation and amortization
Research and development expenses7
Capital expenditures

Balance Sheet and
Cash Flow Information Total assets
(in millions)

Long-term debt and lease obligations

Common Stock
Information

Average number of common shares

outstanding (in millions)8

Income from continuing operations before

cumulative effect of accounting changes per
common share

Basic
Diluted

Cash dividends declared per common share
Year-end market price per common share
Total shareholder return9
Common shareholders of record at year-end

Other Information

$10,378

9,849

9,509

8,904

$ 1,398
575
$
614
$

$
526
$14,686
$ 2,567

958
580
533

444
12,727
2,414

383
601
517

558
14,147
3,933

907
547
553

792
13,707
4,421

8,099

1,026
440
501

852
12,428
4,398

651

622

614

599

600

$ 2.15
$ 2.13
$ 0.582
$ 46.39

24.8%
49,097

1.54
1.52
0.582
37.65

10.7%
58,247

0.62
0.62
0.582
34.54

15.1%
61,298

1.51
1.50
0.582
30.52

11.1%
63,342

1.71
1.66
0.582
28.00

(46.7%)
62,996

1 Income from continuing operations includes a pre-tax charge of $76 million relating to infusion pumps.
2 Income from continuing operations includes a pre-tax benefit of $109 million relating to restructuring charge adjustments, pre-tax charges of
$126 million relating to infusion pumps, and a pre-tax charge of $50 million relating to the exit of hemodialysis instrument manufacturing.
3 Income from continuing operations includes a pre-tax restructuring charge of $543 million and pre-tax other special charges of $289 million.
4 Income from continuing operations includes a pre-tax restructuring charge of $337 million.
5 Income from continuing operations includes pre-tax in-process research and development (IPR&D) charges of $163 million and a pre-tax

research and development (R&D) prioritization charge of $26 million.

6 Refer to the notes to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding other charges and income items.
7 Excludes pre-tax charges for IPR&D and a pre-tax special charge to prioritize certain of the company’s R&D programs, as applicable in each year.
8 Excludes common stock equivalents.
9 Represents the total of appreciation in market price plus cash dividends declared on common shares.

The following graphs compare the change in Baxter’s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the Standard &
Poor’s 500 Composite Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Health Care Index as of December 31 of each year.

P E R F O R M A N C E G R A P H S

$160

$140

$120

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

$100

2003

2004

2005

2006

Baxter

S&P 500

S&P 500 Health Care

$140

$120

$100

$80

$60

$40

2001

B U S I N E S S P R O F I L E

BIOSCIENCE
2006 Sales: $4.4 Billion

MEDICATION DELIVERY
2006 Sales: $3.9 Billion

RENAL
2006 Sales: $2.1 Billion

Baxter is a leading manufacturer of plasma-
based and recombinant proteins to treat
hemophilia. Other products include
plasma-based therapies to treat immune
disorders, alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency
and other chronic blood-related conditions;
albumin, used to treat burns and shock;
products for regenerative medicine, such as
proteins used in hemostasis, wound-sealing
and tissue-regeneration, and products used
in adult stem-cell therapies; and vaccines.

Baxter is a leading manufacturer of products
used to deliver fluids and drugs to patients.
These include intravenous (IV) solutions
and administration sets, premixed drugs
and drug-reconstitution systems, pre-filled
vials and syringes for injectable drugs, and
electronic infusion devices. The company
also provides IV nutrition products, inhala-
tion anesthetics for general anesthesia,
contract manufacturing services, and drug
formulation and packaging technologies.

Baxter is a leading manufacturer of products
for peritoneal dialysis (PD), a home therapy
for people with irreversible kidney failure
who require renal replacement therapy.
These products include PD solutions and
related supplies to help patients manually
perform solution exchanges, as well as
automated PD cyclers that provide therapy
to patients overnight. Baxter also distributes
products for hemodialysis, which is generally
conducted in a hospital or clinic.

2006 HIGHLIGHTS

Launched ADVATE, Baxter’s leading
recombinant factor VIII clotting factor for
hemophilia A, in Australia and Canada.

Completed second Phase I clinical trial
for inhaled insulin using Baxter’s
proprietary PROMAXX technology.

Entered into agreements with the
governments of Austria and the United
Kingdom to supply candidate H5N1
pandemic influenza vaccine.

Initiated a Phase II clinical trial investi-
gating the use of adult, autologous
CD34+ stem cells to treat chronic
myocardial ischemia.

Introduced ADEPT, a solution to
address post-surgical adhesions in
women who undergo gynecological
laparoscopic surgery.

Announced program to develop a
recombinant therapy for von
Willebrand disease.

Introduced AVIVA, a premium line of IV
solutions that expands Baxter’s offering
of non-polyvinyl chloride containers to a
broader range of IV bags.

Announced plans to form a joint
venture with Guangzhou Baiyunshan
Pharmaceutical Co. to provide IV
nutrition products in China.

Launched sevoflurane, the world’s most
widely used inhaled anesthetic for
general anesthesia, in Australia, China,
Japan, Mexico, the United Kingdom and
the United States.

Realized net patient gains of more than
8,400 PD patients worldwide, an
increase of nearly 7 percent. Greatest
growth was in Asia, driven by greater
access to the therapy in China and India.

Began selling EXTRANEAL PD solution in
Mexico, where nearly 80 percent of
dialysis patients are on PD. This
specialty non-glucose-based solution
offers increased fluid removal over a
long-dwell period.

Launched XENIUM, a new synthetic
dialyzer for hemodialysis, which has
shown exceptional performance
compared to other synthetic dialyzers.

Baxter International Inc.
One Baxter Parkway
Deerfield, Illinois 60015