Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Beowulf Mining plc

Beowulf Mining plc

bem · LSE Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker bem
Exchange LSE
Sector Basic Materials
Industry
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2019 Annual Report · Beowulf Mining plc
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annual Report  

2019

Joutsijärvi

Merivaara

Kallak

FINLAND

Polvela

Pitkäjärvi
(Aitolampi)
Rääpysjärvi

Karhunmäki

Tammijärvi

SWEDEN

Åtvidaberg

Beowulf   
Mining  
projects

Mitrovica

KOSOVO

Viti

2
2

Contents

Company Profile  

Company Strategy 

Chairman’s Statement 

Review of Operations and Activities  

Board of Directors and Senior Management 

Strategic Report  

Report of the Directors  

Remuneration Report 

Corporate Governance Report 

Independent Auditor’s Report 

Consolidated Income Statement  

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income  

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position  

Company Statement of Financial Position  

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity  

Company Statement of Changes in Equity  

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows  

Company Statement of Cash flows 

      2

4

5

14

26

28

34

37

39

42

50

51

52

53

54

56

58

59

Notes to the Consolidated and Company Financial Statements 

60

Company Information  

96

2

1

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual ReportCompany Profile

Beowulf Mining plc (“Beowulf” or the 
“Company”) is listed on London’s Alternative 
Investment Market (“AIM”) (Ticker: BEM) and 
Stockholm’s Spotlight exchange (Ticker: BEO). 

The Company has a portfolio of assets in Kosovo, Finland and Sweden, 
all at different stages of development. Beowulf’s strategy is to build a 
sustainable and innovative mining company which creates shareholder value 
by developing mining assets, delivering production and generating cashflow, 
and, in doing so, meet society’s ongoing need for minerals and metals. 

PORTFOLIO OF ASSETS IN

KOSOVO

FINLAND

SWEDEN

42.2% stake in 
Vardar Minerals Ltd

RESOURCES

Aitolampi 
(Graphite)

Kallak 
(Iron Ore)

EXPLORATION PERMITS

Mitrovica

(Pb, Zn, Cu, Ag, Au)

Rääpysjärvi

(Graphite)

Åtvidaberg

(Pb, Zn, Cu, Ag)

Viti

(Cu, Au, Li)

2

At the signing date of this report the Company 
has a 42.2 per cent interest in Vardar Minerals Ltd 
(“Vardar”). Vardar is a UK registered exploration 
company with a focus on the mineral endowed 
Balkan region and is one of the first companies to 
be awarded exploration licences in Kosovo. In 2019, 
the Company obtained control of Vardar and, as 
such, the Vardar Group is now consolidated into the 
Company and subject to the same financial controls 
and scrutiny. 

Vardar has two exploration licences located on 
the Tethyan Belt, a major orogenic metallogenic 
province for gold and base metals which extends 
from the Alps (Carpathians/Balkans) to Turkey, Iran 
and Indochina, and contains several world class 
discoveries. The Tethyan Belt of south-east Europe 
can be regarded as Europe’s chief copper-gold 
(lead-zinc-silver) province. Vardar’s Mitrovica and 
Viti licences are highly prospective for base and 
precious metals, with early indications suggesting 
the potential for porphyry style mineralisation.

Through its 100 per cent owned subsidiary Oy 
Fennoscandian Resources AB (“Fennoscandian”), 
the Company has a portfolio of graphite 
exploration prospects in Finland.  During 2019, 
the Fennoscandian team produced an upgraded 
Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) for the Aitolampi 
project, with a global Indicated and Inferred Mineral 
Resource of 26.7 million tonnes (“Mt”) at 4.8 per cent 
Total Graphitic Carbon (“TGC”) for 1,275,000 tonnes 
of contained graphite, reported in accordance with 
the JORC Code, 2012 edition.

Fennoscandian is pursuing a strategy of developing 
a ‘resource footprint’ of natural flake graphite 
prospects that can provide transparent ‘security of 
supply’ and enable Finland to achieve its ambition 
of self-sufficiency in battery manufacturing. 
The Company is also developing its knowledge 
in processing and manufacturing value-added 
graphite products, including anode material for 
lithium-ion batteries. 

The Company’s most advanced project is the Kallak 
magnetite iron ore deposit located approximately 40 
kilometres (“km”) west of Jokkmokk in the County of 
Norrbotten, Northern Sweden, 80 km southwest of 
the major iron ore mining centre of Malmberget, and 
approximately 120 km to the southwest of LKAB’s 
Kiruna iron ore mine. 

The first exploration licence for Kallak was awarded 
by the Mining Inspectorate of Sweden in 2006. A 
MRE for Kallak North and South, based on drilling 
conducted between 2010-2014, a total of 131 holes 
and 27,895 metres was finalised on 28 November 
2014.  Following the guidelines of the JORC Code, 
2012 edition, an Indicated Resource of 118.5 Mt 
at 27.5 per cent iron content (“Fe”) and Inferred 
Resource of 33.8 Mt at 26.2 per cent Fe was defined. 
Also, there is an additional exploration target of 90-
100 Mt at 22-30 per cent Fe.

Testwork on Kallak ore has shown that a ‘super’ 
high grade magnetite concentrate can be 
produced, yielding over 71 per cent iron content, 
with low levels of deleterious elements, including 
phosphorous and sulphur, lending itself to 
pelletisation and consumption in Direct Reduction 
Iron (“DRI”) facilities in Europe and the Middle East, 
and attracting a potential price premium. 

In April 2013, the Company applied for an 
Exploitation Concession for Kallak North (the 
“Concession”) and in October 2015, the Mining 
Inspectorate recommended to the Swedish 
Government that the Concession be awarded. The 
Company is still waiting on the Swedish Government 
to take a decision.

In southern Sweden, the Company has its 
Åtvidaberg nr 1 (“Åtvidaberg”) exploration licence, 
which is prospective for polymetallic discoveries, 
mainly copper and zinc. 

The Company’s approach is to develop mining 
projects working in partnership with local 
communities and key stakeholders, and is 
encapsulated in the following mission statements: 

“Visar respekt fôr alla intressenter” 
“Vill samverka lokalt” 
“Står fôr ansvarsfull utveckling”

“Kunnioittaa kaikkia sidosryhmiä” 
“Toimia yhteistyössä paikallisten kanssa” 
“Vastuullisuus”

“Showing respect to all our stakeholders” 
“Becoming a local partner” 
“Delivering responsible development”

2

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

3
3

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual ReportCompany Strategy

Beowulf’s strategy is to build a sustainable 
and innovative mining company which creates 
shareholder value by developing mining assets, 
delivering production and generating cashflow, 
and, in doing so, meet society’s ongoing need for 
minerals and metals. 

value-added graphite products, including anode 
material for lithium-ion batteries. 

Beowulf is focused on gaining an Exploitation 
Concession for Kallak North, and thereafter 
completing a Scoping Study on the project. The 
Company considers the introduction of a strategic 
partner/investor, who understands the value of 
Kallak as a high-quality iron ore asset, as an 
important step which could expedite Kallak’s 
development towards a production start within 
four to five years.  This does not preclude the 
Company from continuing to de-risk and add value 
to Kallak in the meantime. 

Beowulf is developing a high-quality asset base, 
which is diversified by geography and commodity, 
enabling it to simultaneously advance several 
projects up the mining value curve and create 
shareholder value. 

Additionally, the Board of Directors continues 
to look beyond the Company for value creation 
opportunities.

The investment of Vardar is one such example. 
Vardar adds exploration capability in the highly 
prospective Tethyan Belt which has seen both 
significant discoveries and M&A activity. 

Fennoscandian is pursuing a strategy of 
developing a ‘resource footprint’ of natural flake 
graphite prospects that can provide transparent 
‘security of supply’ and enable Finland to 
achieve its ambition of self-sufficiency in battery 
manufacturing. The Company is a recipient of 
Business Finland funding, which is supporting 
Fennoscandian to move downstream, and develop 
its knowledge in processing and manufacturing 

4

Chairman’s Statement

Introduction

In 2019, while our frustrations continued with Kallak 
and still no decision from the Swedish Government, 
the Company continued to advance projects in 
Kosovo and Finland. 

In Kosovo, the Company increased its investment in 
Vardar Minerals, funding exploration programmes 
across two base and precious metals licences 
situated in the attractive Tethyan Belt, and, in 
Finland, the Fennoscandian Resources’ team 
produced an upgraded Mineral Resource Estimate 
(“MRE”) for the Aitolampi graphite project and 
continued to play an important role in Finland’s 
emerging battery sector.

Despite the formation of a new Swedish 
Government in January 2019, no progress with 
regards to the Exploitation Concession for Kallak 
was made during the year.  While the Minister 
talked of transparency and predictability, neither of 
these were evident in the handling of the Company’s 
application, nor it being prioritised, as suggested by 
the Government and talk of a ‘forthcoming decision’ 
did not materialise.

Kallak provides the foundation asset of the 
Company, but with Vardar Minerals and 
Fennoscandian Resources, Beowulf has a diversified 
portfolio of assets, each business area displaying 
strong prospects and offering investors optionality.

4

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

5
5

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual ReportR
A
D
R
A
V

6

Vardar Minerals  
(“Vardar”)

During 2019, significant progress was made in 
Kosovo. The Vardar team delivered ‘big company’ 
geoscience on a junior’s budget. Exploration results 
developed our understanding of the copper-gold 
porphyry potential at both the Mitrovica and Viti 
projects.  Porphyry deposits are exceptionally large, 
low grade, polymetallic systems, that typically 
contain copper along with other metals, such as gold, 
silver, zinc and lead. 

On 1 April, the Company announced that it had 
increased its ownership in Vardar to approximately 
37.6 per cent for the consideration of £750,000, 
satisfied in cash, funding exploration activities 
in 2019.  As a result, the Company obtained 
control over the Vardar Group and consolidated 
it into the Company’s financials. Later in the year, 
Beowulf followed its money, investing two  further 
instalments, £115,000 announced on 14 October 
and £100,000 announced on 6 November taking the 
Company’s ownership to 41.5 per cent.

At Mitrovica, located immediately to the west and 
northwest of the world class Stan Terg lead-zinc-
silver mine, potential not only exists for the discovery 
of additional lead-zinc-silver deposits, but also for 
the discovery of high-level epithermal gold deposits 
and for copper-zinc deposits.  Vardar believes all 
the targets are related to a potentially much larger 
porphyry style mineralised system. 

At Viti, initial stratigraphic holes, intersected the 
correct alteration type, returning gold and visible 
copper mineralisation, and indicating potential for the 
discovery of a mineralised copper-gold porphyry in a 
hitherto unexplored area. 

In February 2020, Vardar identified an additional 
copper-zinc exploration target at Mitrovica, and 
Beowulf invested a further £50,000, increasing 
the Company’s ownership to 42.2 per cent. Then, 
in March, Beowulf co-invested another £30,000, 
alongside existing and founding shareholders, as part 
of a £70,000 total fundraise for soil sampling over 
the gold target at Majdan Peak, part of the Mitrovica 
licence.

In June 2020, results from the soil sampling 
programme completed across Majdan Peak were 
announced.  An extensive gold anomaly has been 
identified over an area approximately 1400 metres x 
700 metres, with individual soil samples returning up 
to 0.36 grammes per tonne (“g/t”) gold.  Furthermore, 
a new lead-zinc-copper-gold target has been 
identified to the south of Majdan Peak, of significance 
given its proximity to the Stan Terg mine.

Fennoscandian 
Resources 
(“Fennoscandian”)

Fennoscandian had another strong year. 
Further drilling at Aitolampi supporting an 
upgraded MRE, with an 81 per cent increase 
in contained graphite (compared to the 
2018 MRE) for the higher-grade western 
zone, and an updated global Indicated and 
Inferred Mineral Resource of 26.7 million 
tonnes (“Mt”) at 4.8 per cent Total Graphitic 
Carbon (“TGC”) for 1,275,000 tonnes of 
contained graphite.   

Fennoscandian continues to develop a 
‘resource footprint’ of natural flake graphite 
to provide ‘security of supply’ to Finland’s 
emerging battery sector and to benefit from 
Business Finland funding, as it seeks to 
establish its battery grade anode material 
credentials.

I

N
A
D
N
A
C
S
O
N
N
E
F

6

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

7

Throughout 2019, Beowulf continued to push for a decision from the Swedish Government on its application for an 
Exploitation Concession for Kallak. The Company continued to work with the Mayor in Jokkmokk, Norrbotten Regional 
Council Members and Norrbotten Members of Parliament to lobby the Government.

Ja n u ary 
2 0 1 9

A pril 
2 0 1 9

M ay  
2 0 1 9

In May 2019, I and the CEO 
met with Mr. Emil Högberg, 
State Secretary to the Minister, 
to again make a case for the 
Concession being awarded. 
The State Secretary closed the 
meeting acknowledging the 
importance of the Kallak project 
to Jokkmokk. After the summer, 
the Company followed up again 
with the State Secretary to 
ensure the Government had all 
the information it needed with 
respect to our application. 

In late January 2019, Kurt Budge 
CEO delivered a presentation 
titled ‘Sustainability in the heart - 
partnership, the lifecycle of mining 
projects, balancing the interest 
of stakeholders’ at the Future 
Mine and Mineral Conference in 
Stockholm.

The CEO spoke of the damage 
the permitting process for Kallak 
and other mining cases is having 
on Sweden’s reputation as a 
destination for mining investors. 
The CEO presented Beowulf’s 
approach to sustainable mining 
and outlined how the Company 
can play its part in ensuring that 
Sweden continues to lead in this 
area, by developing a modern 
and sustainable mining operation 
at Kallak in partnership with the 
community in Jokkmokk, which 
includes Sami reindeer herders. 

Beowulf continued to support 
the OECD’s work in Sweden, 
attending the launch of the report 
on its Rural Policy Review ‘Linking 
the Indigenous Sami People 
with Regional Development 
in Sweden’, having previously 
participated in the OECD’s land-
use workshop in early 2018.

Later in the year, the CEO 
attended the third OECD 
Meeting for Mining Regions 
and Cities, organised to enable 
knowledge sharing, with a 
focus on developing policy 
recommendations and standards 
that can help maximise the 
benefits that mining can bring to 
a region or city. 

8
8

In April 2019, I wrote to Minister 
Baylan, Minister for Business, 
Industry, and Innovation for 
The Government of Sweden 
regarding the Kallak application. 
I reminded the Minister that since 
the Company first submitted its 
application in 2013, the case 
has been sent back and forth 
between Swedish authorities, and 
still the Government, finds itself 
unable to award an Exploitation 
Concession for one of Europe’s 
largest drill defined iron ore 
deposits, a potential global 
resource of 250 million tonnes.  

The first exploration permit for 
Kallak was granted by the Mining 
Inspectorate in 2006, and, since 
that time, Swedish authorities 
have permitted the Company to 
invest over SEK 80 million. While 
the Kallak project suffers delay 
after delay, LKAB, the state iron 
ore company, warned in October 
2018 that the ore in the Kiruna 
mine will be depleted earlier than 
expected.  This placed the media 
spotlight on the future of LKAB’s 
operations and the strategic 
importance of iron ore to Sweden. 
Further highlighting the absurdity 
of the situation with Kallak.  

In communication with the 
Government, it was confirmed 
that the Kallak application 
was being prioritised and 
acknowledged that the Company 
had been waiting an excessive 
period of time for a decision.  
On this basis, the Company 
reasonably expected that a 
decision would be taken by the 
Government before the summer 
of 2019.

July  
2 0 1 9

Following Almedalen in July, the Company 
outlined its immediate three-step plan 
for advancing the Kallak project, in the 
event the Swedish Government awards the 
Concession:

1

2

3

Scoping Study - completion 
within 12 months of the 
Concession being awarded 
- and in parallel develop a 
roadmap for environmental 
permitting.

Formation of a ‘Development 
Taskforce’ with Jokkmokks 
Kommun and other key partners 
with an interest in Kallak, 
such that the development of 
Kallak and the opportunity to 
regenerate Jokkmokk can be 
fully coordinated.

To advance discussions with 
the Sami reindeer herding 
communities, to listen to 
their concerns, find solutions 
together to problems that 
might exist, working towards 
reaching mutually beneficial 
agreements that ensure Sami 
reindeer herding, livelihoods and 
culture are protected, and that 
Sami communities benefit from 
the development of a mine at 
Kallak.

K
A
L
L
A
K

8

8

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

9
9

S epte m b er 
2 0 1 9

N ove m b er 
2 0 1 9

D ece m b er 
2 0 1 9

In December, the CEO wrote 
again to Minister Baylan. The CEO 
requested that the Government 
provide Beowulf with details on 
when the Company can expect 
the decision on Kallak to be taken. 
A response to the CEO’s letter 
arrived in February 2020, in which 
the State Secretary stated that 
the Government was not able to 
comment on when a decision is 
expected to be taken, however, 
the Government had taken careful 
note of information provided. 

In September 2019, the CEO 
wrote to Minister Baylan, 
following meetings with advisors, 
including legal advisors, and 
the new CEO at SveMin, asking 
for clarity on the process and 
timeline to a decision by the 
Government. In response, Minister 
Baylan explained that the CEO’s 
request for a meeting “concerns a 
forthcoming Government decision 
- a dossier that is currently 
under preparation”, and that the 
Government is unable to meet 
or comment with regard to its 
“ongoing review”.

Also, the Company engaged 
legal firm Mannheimer Swartling 
to work with Fröberg & 
Lundholm to review its Kallak 
application.  Specifically, to 
review statements by the County 
Administrative Board for the 
County of Norrbotten (“CAB”), 
including the CAB’s statement 
made in November 2017, and 
the Company’s comments to 
the Government criticising that 
statement. The findings of the 
legal analysis were unequivocal, 
that the Company has robustly 
argued its case for a Concession 
to be awarded.  

10

In November 2019, the Company 
submitted a concluding statement 
(the “Statement”) for Kallak, 
prepared by Mannheimer Swartling 
and Fröberg & Lundholm, to the 
Government.  The Statement 
stressed that, as has previously been 
demonstrated by the Company, 
and acknowledged by the CAB, the 
establishment of a mine at Kallak 
would have significant positive 
effects on the local economy: 
creating jobs, generating tax 
revenues for Jokkmokk municipality, 
and stimulating and diversifying the 
business sector in Jokkmokk. In so 
doing, Kallak would help solve the 
problems Jokkmokk is facing, a lack 
of investment in new enterprise and 
job creation, and a declining and 
ageing population, which is placing 
a financial burden on Jokkmokks 
Kommun that it cannot afford to 
bear.

The Statement noted that neither the 
Company’s Reindeer Herding Impact 
Assessment, nor the Environmental 
Impact Assessment have concluded 
that mining operations at Kallak 
would threaten the existence and 
livelihoods of local Sami reindeer 
herding communities. Furthermore, 
the Statement highlighted the 
similarities between Kallak and 
available case law, which support 
the approval of the Concession.

The Statement did not contain 
new facts in the Kallak case, as 
all necessary and relevant facts 
have already been established as 
part of the application process, 
now lasting over 7 years. Rather, 
the Statement summarised the 
circumstances relevant to a judicial 
review of whether Beowulf should be 
awarded the Exploitation Concession 
for Kallak, concluding that the 
Concession should be awarded.  

Febru ary 
2 0 2 0

M ay 
2 0 2 0

Ju ne 
2 0 2 0

In February 2020, the CEO 
participated in a meeting 
discussing the ‘Mining industry 
and indigenous peoples: 
regulations, best practice and 
social innovation’. On this 
subject, the inclusion of Sami in 
regional development in Sweden, 
permitting, sustainable mining, 
supply chain transparency, the 
Green Economy and the Fossil 
Free Economy, Beowulf is an 
active participant and contributor 
to the debate.  

In May 2020, the Company 
awarded a drilling contract for up 
to 1,650 metres diamond drilling, 
targeting additional potential 
iron ore mineralisation at Kallak 
South.  The work programme 
will determine if a 3D seismic 
model can be constructed, 
using the established seismic 
characteristics of the Kallak 
deposit.  If successful, the set-
up could then be applied to 
the Parkijaure nr 6 Exploration 
Licence, awarded by the Mining 
Inspectorate in October 2019. 

In June 2020, the CEO wrote 
again to Minister Baylan, after 
a Parliamentary Question had 
been put to the Minister by a 
member of Parliament asking 
when a decision will be taken 
on Kallak.  The CEO reminded 
Minister Baylan, that when the 
Minister spoke at the Mining 
Nordic Day in Toronto in early 
March, he saved his biggest 
welcome for investors and said 
that the CEO was welcome to do 
business in Sweden. In the letter, 
the CEO stated that Beowulf is 
unable to do business in Sweden, 
because the Company cannot 
get a decision on Kallak from the 
Government.

The Swedish Geological Survey (“SGU”) a 
Government Office, which first discovered Kallak 
in the 1940s, designated it an Area of National 
Interest in 2013, produced its latest study in 
May 2020, headlined ‘New light on iron ore at 
Kallak’.  Kallak has been on the SGU’s radar for 80 
years!  The Mining Inspectorate, part of the SGU, 
recommended to the Government in October 2015, 
that the Concession for Kallak should be awarded, 
and last October awarded an Exploration Permit for 
Parkijaure nr 6.

On the evidence, the authorities are happy for 
Beowulf to continue to invest in iron ore exploration, 
which in the context of LKAB’s announcement, in 
October 2018, on diminishing reserves at Kiruna 
and the need to replenish, recent seismic activity 
disrupting production at Kiruna, while thankfully 
sparing lives, and Government statements on a 
sustainable mining industry, makes sense.  Yet, 
over 4.5 years after the Mining Inspectorate 
recommended to the Government that the 
Concession for Kallak be awarded, with the 
application sitting on the Government’s desk for 
the last 3 years and Beowulf planning to drill the 

90-100 million tonnes Exploration Target at Kallak 
South, the Company still has no decision.  

In the CEO’s letter, Minster Baylan was reminded, 
that Beowulf has several thousand Swedish 
shareholders, who own over 67 per cent of the 
Company.  Shareholders have witnessed the 
Government’s unacceptable mishandling of 
the Kallak application and false promises, the 
opportunity cost of which is incalculable, and they 
opportunity cost of which is incalculable, and they 
are demanding the Government be fully transparent 
are demanding the Government be fully transparent 
now and remove all uncertainty as to when a 
now and remove all uncertainty as to when a 
decision on Kallak will be taken.

With benchmark iron ore prices above US$100 per 
With benchmark iron ore prices above US$100 per 
tonne, investors with cash are looking for investment 
tonne, investors with cash are looking for investment 
opportunities, such as Kallak, and towards mining 
opportunities, such as Kallak, and towards mining 
jurisdictions that function effectively.  

Jokkmokk’s need for investment and jobs is acute, 
Jokkmokk’s need for investment and jobs is acute, 
and, with the added pressure of COVID-19, it would 
and, with the added pressure of COVID-19, it would 
seem logical that a project such as Kallak, which has 
seem logical that a project such as Kallak, which has 
the potential to bring billions of SEK in investment 
the potential to bring billions of SEK in investment 
and hundreds of jobs to northern Sweden, should 
and hundreds of jobs to northern Sweden, should 
finally gain approval.  The CEO has not received a 
finally gain approval.  The CEO has not received a 
response from the Minister to his latest letter.
response from the Minister to his latest letter.

10

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

11
11
11

Shareholder Base
Beowulf is over 98 per cent owned by retail 
shareholders in Sweden and the UK. The 
proportion of shares owned by Swedish 
shareholders continued to grow during the year. 

At 31 May 2020, there were 403,904,279 Swedish 
Depository Receipts representing 67.07 per cent 
of the issued share capital of the Company. The 
remaining issued share capital of the Company is 
held in the UK. 

The Group is dependent on further equity 
fundraising to operate as a going concern for at 
least twelve months from the date of approval of 
the financial statements. Although the Group has 
had past success in fundraising and continues to 
attract interest from investors, making the Board 
confident that such fundraising will be available 
to provide the required capital, there can be no 
guarantee that such fundraising will be available 
and as such this constitutes a material uncertainty 
over going concern.  

I would like to thank our existing and new 
shareholders for their steadfast support. 

Raising Finance
Maintaining sufficient funding to sustain the 
business is a significant challenge for an 
exploration and development company in the 
natural resources sector. 

During the year, the Company raised £2.0 million 
before expenses, through subscriptions for new 
ordinary shares of £0.01 each, with funds being 
invested in Vardar Minerals, Fennoscandian 
Resources and for working capital purposes.

The Board continues to adopt the going 
concern basis to the preparation of the financial 
statements and is confident of the Company 
continuing to operate into the foreseeable future. 
This assessment has been arrived at after 
the Board has considered various alternative 
operating strategies should these be necessary 
in the light of the current macro-economic 
conditions, and is satisfied that such revised 
operating strategies could be adopted, if and 
when necessary. Specific attention needs to be 
drawn to the comments made in respect of the 
impact the COVID-19 pandemic on going concern 
and the approaches being taken by the Group to 
manage and mitigate the additional operational 
and financial challenges being faced at present.

The financial statements at 31 December 2019 
show that the Group generated an operating loss 
for the year of £428,707 (2018: £1,374,584); with 
cash used in operating activities of £959,742 
(2018: £653,832) and a net decrease in cash and 
cash equivalents of £404,099 in the year (2018: 
decrease of  £56,021). The Group balance sheet 
showed cash reserves at 31 December 2019 of 
12
£1,124,062 (2018: £1,533,232). 

2019 Financial Performance
As of 1 April 2019, following an increase in 
Beowulf’s investment in Vardar and ownership 
from 14.1% to 31.3% the Company obtained 
control of the Vardar Group and as result of this 
control the Vardar Group has been consolidated 
into the Company effective of this date. 

At the year-end, further investments in Vardar 
increased the Company’s holding to 41.5% with a 
resulting carrying value gain to 31 December 2019 
of £563,431. 

The consolidated loss fell in the year from 
£1,374,58 to £428,707. This decrease is primarily 
attributable to a £563,431 fair value gain on the 
investment in Vardar and lower impairment charge 
on Sala (£10,720) compared to the impairment 
charges in the prior year (£571,456). 

A further contribution to the decrease was a 
lower share-based payment charge relating to 
employees and Directors options of £119,720 for 
the year compared to £194,460 incurred in the 
year to 31 December 2018.

The administration expenses increased in the year 
from £598,391 to £904,666, due largely to the 
inclusion of Vardar’s administration expenses from 
1 April 2019 to 31 December 2019 of £247,493.

Consolidated basic and diluted loss per share for 
the 12 months ended 31 December 2019 was 0.04 
pence (2018: loss of 0.25 pence). 

The cash held at the year-end was £1,124,062 
(2018: £2,071,748).

The translation reserve losses attributable to the 
owners of the parent increased from £520,257 at 
31 December 2018 to £1,287,678 at 31 December 
2019. Much of the Company’s exploration costs 
are in Swedish Krona which has weakened further 
against the pound since 31 December 2018.

12

 
 
The Government has had the Kallak application 
on its desk for the last 3 years.  Minister Baylan 
wrote last September of a ‘forthcoming decision’, 
yet another 10 months has passed and the 
Company is still waiting for a decision.  Minister 
Baylan speaks of transparency and predictability 
in permitting processes, but the Company has 
no information on what process the Government 
is following or when a decision will be made. If 
Minister Baylan is genuine in welcoming investors 
to Sweden, then needs to act now and end the 
12-year drought for a new mine being permitted 
in Sweden.  How else can exploration companies 
consider Sweden a low-risk mining jurisdiction, 
if after investing and finding resources, you are 
stopped from advancing a project.  

I would like to take this opportunity to highlight 
that, although we are being frustrated in Sweden 
and facing difficult times with COVID-19, 
fundamentally, as a business, Beowulf is in a 
strong position. We have a diversified asset base, 
supportive shareholders, in both Sweden and the 
UK, and excellent liquidity in the trading of the 
Company’s shares. 

Kallak remains the foundation asset of the 
Company, on which we are building an exciting 
future.  The Mining Journal ran the headline 
‘Tethyan Belt a strong draw at PDAC’ and so our 
investments in Vardar’s developing potential over 
the last 18-months seem to have been well-timed 
and Fennoscandian is well-positioned in Finland’s 
emerging battery sector as a local supplier of 
natural flake graphite. 

Göran Färm 
Non-Executive Chairman 
28 July 2020

Corporate 
The Company announced, on 14 January 2019, 
that options were granted to Directors and 
a senior manager over a total of 8,000,000 
ordinary shares of £0.01 each in the capital of the 
Company, representing approximately 1.41 per 
cent of the issued share capital of the Company.

Options were last awarded to Kurt Budge in July 
2015, and to Christopher Davies and Rasmus 
Blomqvist in January 2017.

The Share Options are exercisable at a price of 
7.35 pence per share, being a 30 per cent premium 
to the closing mid-price of 5.65 pence per share 
on 11 January 2019. The Share Options fully 
vest one year from the date of grant or fully vest 
immediately if the individual leaves the Company.  
The Share Options are valid for five years from the 
date of grant.    

Staff and Employees
On behalf of the Board, I would like to express 
my sincere thanks to our staff and employees in 
Sweden and Finland, and also to the staff and 
employees of Vardar, for their significant efforts 
throughout the past 12 months to drive our 
Company forwards. 

Outlook
The Company has acted to face the ongoing threat 
posed by COVID-19, as best we can, including 30 
percent salary cuts for the CEO and Board, and 
sought to maintain a ‘business as usual’ attitude.  
Despite the economic shock, mines in the Nordic 
region have continued to operate and Vardar has 
been able to work in Kosovo.

As governments bring COVID-19 under control, 
their focus should shift to restarting economies 
and enabling investment, job creation and 
supporting communities. A mine at Kallak has the 
potential to generate hundreds of jobs in northern 
Sweden and deliver an economic resurgence in 
Jokkmokk.  

13

12

12

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
Vardar Minerals 
Limited (“Vardar”) 

Operations 
and Activities 

During the year, Beowulf increased its ownership 
in Vardar Minerals Limited (“Vardar”), a UK 
registered private exploration company with 
exploration licences in Kosovo, to 41.5 per 
cent. The Company funded Vardar’s 2019 
works programme including diamond drilling, 
geophysical surveys, and other activities. Results 
helped develop our understanding of the copper 
and gold porphyry potential at both the Mitrovica 
and Viti projects. 

O Review of 
V
O
S
O
deposits. K

Porphyry deposits are exceptionally large, low 
grade, polymetallic systems, that typically contain 
copper along with other metals, such as gold, 
silver, zinc, and lead. Examples in the region 
include the Kiseljak deposit in Serbia (Inferred 
Resource: 459 million tonnes at 0.22 per cent 
copper, 0.2 grammes per tonne gold. Source: 
Dunav Resources’ announcement, June 2014) and 
the Skouries high grade gold-copper deposit in 
Greece (Measured and Indicated Resource: 289 
million tonnes at 0.43 per cent copper and 0.58 
grammes per tonne gold. Inferred Resource: 170 
million tonnes at 0.34 per cent copper and 0.31 
grammes per tonne gold. Source: Eldorado Gold).

In April, the Company announced that it had 
exercised its option to increase its ownership in 
Vardar to approximately 37.6 per cent for the 
consideration of £750,000, satisfied in cash, 
funding exploration activities at the Mitrovica 
and Viti projects.  Then later in the year, Beowulf 
followed its money, investing a further £215,000, 
taking the Company’s ownership to 41.5 per cent.

At Mitrovica, located near to the world class Stan 
Terg lead-zinc-silver mine, potential not only exists 
for the discovery of additional lead-zinc-silver 
deposits, but also for the discovery of high-level 
deposits, but also for the discovery of high-level 
deposits, but also for the discovery of high-level 
epithermal gold deposits and for copper-zinc 
epithermal gold deposits and for copper-zinc 
epithermal gold deposits and for copper-zinc 

14
14

It is simplistic to think of these targets, which 
occur along a seven-kilometre trend, in isolation. 
However, Vardar believes the targets are all 
related to a potentially much larger porphyry 
style mineralised system, based on meticulous 
geological mapping of hydrothermal alteration and 
interpretation of trench, drill and soil geochemical 
exploration data. 

At Viti, initial stratigraphic holes, drilled in 
2019, intersected the correct alteration type, 
returning gold and visible copper mineralisation, 
that indicates potential for the discovery of a 
mineralised copper-gold porphyry in a hitherto 
unexplored area. 

Exploration Overview
Both Mitrovica and Viti projects are located within the Tethyan Belt, a major orogenic metallogenic 
province for gold and base metals which extends from the Alps (Carpathians/Balkans) to Turkey, 
Iran and Indochina, and contains several world class discoveries. 

The Tethyan Belt of south-east Europe can be regarded as Europe’s chief copper-gold (lead-zinc-
silver) province.  Mitrovica and Viti occur within calc-alkaline magmatic arc(s) which developed 
during the closure of the Neotethys Ocean, primarily targeting epithermal gold, lead-zinc-silver 
replacement deposits and porphyry related copper-gold mineralisation.

The lack of modern-day exploration in the Balkans presents a real opportunity for new 
discoveries.

Mitrovica 

The Mitrovica project is situated in northern 
Kosovo, covers 55 square kilometres (“km2”), and 
lies immediately to the west and northwest of the 
Stan Terg lead-zinc-silver mine which dates back 
to the 1930s (historical production records: 34 Mt 
at 3.45 per cent lead, 2.30 per cent zinc and 80 g/t 
silver). 

The licence is prospective for a range of porphyry-
related mineralisation types, including the Majdan 
Peak high-sulphidation epithermal gold target, the 
Wolf Mountain low-sulphidation lead-zinc-silver 
target and primary porphyry copper mineralisation 
target and primary porphyry copper mineralisation 
target and primary porphyry copper mineralisation 
in the southern part of the licence area. 
in the southern part of the licence area. 
in the southern part of the licence area. 

On a regional scale, the area is located within 
the late Alpine Tethyan Orogenic Belt and more 
specifically within the External Vardar Sub-zone 
of the Vardar Zone. The basement is comprised 
of ophiolites and a metasedimentary mélange 
affected by a polymetamorphic overprint (not 
exceeding greenschist facies conditions). A 
series of felsic to intermediate sub-volcanic and 
pyroclastic rocks of Oligocene to Early Miocene 
age represents the cover sequence.

14

14

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

15

Wolf Mountain

The Wolf Mountain target forms a prominent 
outcropping feature, with strike length of more 
than 4 km and width ranging from almost 20 
metres (“m”) to greater than 300 m.  It represents 
a hydrothermal breccia zone with stockworks, 
which outcrop as a gossan, with iron-manganese 
oxides and hydroxides. The peripheral parts of 
the zone are characterised by intense silicification 
corresponding to fold structures which control the 
development of the hydrothermal breccia. 

The mineralisation is structurally controlled, and 
for most of the target mineralisation is developed 
in the basement, broadly following a tectonic 
contact between ultramafic rocks and phyllite, 
with the bulk of mineralisation developed within 
the ultramafic units. Mineralisation is likely vein/
replacement-type related to Oligocene magmatic 
activity responsible for the hydrothermal systems 
mapped in the southern portion of the licence area. 

In June, the Company reported that in the northern 
part of Wolf Mountain, Vardar had completed 
651 m of drilling and a total of 278.5 m of 
trenching, carried out over outcropping stockwork 
and hydrothermal breccia mineralisation. In the 
southern part of the licence, a soil sampling 
programme was undertaken.

Exploration results were reported in September 
2019. Drilling and trenching results confirmed 
extensive lead-zinc-silver mineralisation over an 
area of 800 m in length and 400 m in width in its 
northern part, with significant potential for high-
grade feeder structures.

Vardar is planning to conduct Direct Current - 
Induced Polarisation (“DC-IP”) surveys, the results 
of which, when combined with detailed magnetic 
data, will be used for targeting high-grade 
sulphide-dominant lead-zinc-silver mineralisation 
associated with both mineralised breccia and 
feeder structures

Trenching highlights include:  

•  Trench WM-T01  

returned 1.43 per cent lead, 1.87 per cent zinc and 11 g/t silver over 51.0 m, including 2.01 per 
cent lead, 3.17 per cent zinc and 18 g/t silver over 12.5 m; and

•  Trench WM-T02  

returned 2.7 per cent lead, 0.55 per cent zinc and 10 g/t silver over 18.0 m and 3.6 per cent lead, 
0.64 per cent zinc and 14 g/t silver over 8 m.

•  WM-T01, T02 and T03  

all returned anomalously high lead-zinc-silver concentrations for intersected zones.

Drilling highlights include: 

•  Hole WM001 returned 1.2 per cent lead, 0.36 per cent zinc and 10 g/t silver over 14.1 m;

•  Hole WM003 returned 1.4 per cent zinc over 4.15 m;

•  Hole WM004 returned 1.27 per cent lead, 0.91 per cent zinc and 8 g/t silver over 8.9 m; and 1.4 

per cent zinc over 20.9 m;

•  Hole WM006 returned 1.38 per cent zinc over 19.3 m;

•  Hole WM007 returned 2.69 per cent lead, 0.4 per cent zinc and 16 g/t silver, over 4.3 m;

• Hole WM009 returned 1.29 per cent lead over 3.0 m;

• Hole WM010 returned 2.45 per cent zinc over 2.0 m; and

• Hole WM014 returned 2.14 per cent zinc over 1.0 m.

16

Mitrovica South

Viti

Soil sampling results for the southern half of 
Mitrovica have identified three target areas: 

•  Mitrovica South exhibits potential for a large 
mineralised system - soil sampling results 
have identified distinctive zinc, copper, lead, 
silver, and gold anomalies in the southern part 
of the license, extending laterally from known 
mineralisation, suggesting that the system may 
be larger than indicated by initial geological 
mapping. 

•  Majdan Peak Gold target - anomalous gold and 
silver assays have been returned for the eastern 
margin of the license, corresponding with 
previously mapped advanced argillic alteration, 
identified historic gold workings/pits and 
anomalous rock chip samples (up to 7.2 g/t gold).

•  Majdan Peak Lower Slopes - displays elevated 
copper, zinc and silver in soil results possibly 
correlating with structurally controlled 
mineralisation.

Vardar is planning to conduct DC-IP surveys, the 
results of which, when combined with detailed 
magnetic data, will be used for defining drill 
targets.

The Viti project is situated in south-eastern Kosovo 
and is made up of three adjacent licences covering 
213 km2.  The licences encompass an interpreted 
circular intrusive, indicated by regional airborne 
magnetic data.  There is evidence of intense 
alteration typically associated with porphyry 
systems, with several copper occurrences 
and stream sample anomalies in proximity to, 
and within the project area. In addition, Viti is 
prospective for lithium-boron mineralisation, with 
a geological setting similar to Rio Tinto’s Jadar 
deposit in Serbia.

During the year, orientation drilling at Viti 
intersected the upper part of a copper-gold 
porphyry system. Drilling also identified highly 
altered trachyte porphyry dykes with associated 
copper and gold mineralisation. 

Drill testing was designed to test the extent and 
type of alteration associated with an extensive 
three-kilometre gossanous outcrop, which had 
previously returned anomalous copper and gold 
concentrations in rock grab samples. In addition, 
soil samples were collected to determine the 
extent of possible anomalous metal concentrations 
over the target area. 

Future work will focus on copper-gold target 
delineation using a combination of detailed 
magnetic and DC-IP surveys, and with new 
targets drilling should follow.

Post-Year End 
In February 2020, Vardar identified an additional copper-zinc exploration target at Mitrovica, and 
Beowulf invested a further £50,000, increasing the Company’s ownership to 42.2 per cent. Then, 
in March, Beowulf co-invested alongside existing and founding shareholders another £30,000, as 
part of a £70,000 total fundraise for soil sampling over the gold target at Majdan Peak.

June 2020, results from the soil sampling programme completed across the Majdan Peak 
gold target at Mitrovica were announced, an extensive gold anomaly, identified over an area 
approximately 1400 metres x 700 metres, with individual soil samples returning up to 0.36 
g/t gold.  Furthermore, a new lead-zinc-copper-gold target has been identified to the south of 
Majdan Peak, of significance given its situation, approximately 3 kilometres from the Stan Terg 
mine.

16

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

17
17

Finnish  
Exploration Permits 

Beowulf, via its wholly owned subsidiary, Fennoscandian, currently holds 
two exploration permits, although one approval is being appealed at the 
time of writing and has applied for a further two exploration permits. 

The Company also holds three Claims Reservations, Merivaara 1, 
Tammijärvi 1 and Polvela 1, on which it is allowed to conduct basic 
prospecting work in advance of an application for an exploration permit. 

Permit Name 

Permit ID  Area (km2)  Valid from 

Valid until 

Approved Exploration Permits  
Pitkäjärvi 1 

2016:0040 

10.00 

07/12/2016 

10/01/2021

Rääpysjärvi 1 

2017:0104 

7.16 

25/04/2019 

See note (1)

Applied for Exploration Permits 

Joutsjärvi 1 

2017:0122 

5.79 

Applied for 16/10/2017

Karhunmäki 1 

2019:0113 

10.00 

Applied for 31/12/2019

Notes: 
(1)  Application approved by TUKES 25/04/2019. Administrative Court of Eastern Finland rejected an appeal 

on 27/03/20. Further appeal now lodged with Supreme Administrative Court.

D
N
A
L
N
F

I

18
18

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Aitolampi  
(Pitkäjärvi 1 Exploration Permit) - Graphite

Introduction
The Aitolampi and Pitkäjärvi graphite prospects, 
located in eastern Finland approximately 40km 
southwest of the well-established mining town 
of Outokumpu, were discovered in 2016 and 
are areas of graphitic schists on a fold limb, 
coincidental with an extensive electro-magnetic 
(“EM”) anomaly. Many of the EM zones are 
obscured by glacial till, but graphite observations 
in road cuttings and outcrops are also associated 
with abundant EM anomalies. 

2019 Summary
During the year, the Company made significant 
progress with Fennoscandian, specifically with its 
Aitolampi project, part of the Company’s 100 per 
cent owned Exploration Permit, Pitkäjärvi 1. 

In June, drilling at Aitolampi extended the higher-
grade Western Zone, and, in October 2019, 
Beowulf announced an upgraded MRE for the 
project. 

Additionally, the drilling programme generated 
sample material to support baseline 
environmental studies, for graphite purification 
and spheroidization test work, and the further 
assessment of Aitolampi graphite for battery 
applications as part of the Business Finland 
funded BATCircle Project. 

Highlights of the upgraded 
MRE are as follows: 

Other  
Developments

•  An 81 per cent increase in contained graphite 
(compared to the 2018 MRE) for the higher-
grade western zone with an Indicated and 
Inferred Mineral Resource of 17.2 Mt at 5.2 per 
cent TGC containing 887,000 t of contained 
graphite.

•  An unchanged Indicated and Inferred Mineral 
Resource of 9.5 Mt at 4.1 per cent TGC for 
388,000 t of contained graphite for the eastern 
lens. 

•  Updated global Indicated and Inferred Mineral 

Resource of 26.7 Mt at 4.8 per cent Total 
Graphitic Carbon TGC for 1,275,000 t of 
contained graphite. All material is contained 
within eastern and western graphite mineralised 
lenses, interpreted above a nominal three per 
cent TGC cut-off grade. 

•  An augmented global Indicated and Inferred 

Mineral Resource of 11.1 Mt at 5.7 per cent TGC 
for 630,000 t of contained graphite, reporting 
above a five per cent TGC cut-off, based on the 
grade-tonnage curve for the resource.

In March, the Company announced that 
In March, the Company announced that 
Fennoscandian received additional funding from 
Fennoscandian received additional funding from 
Business Finland, a 50 per cent contribution to 
Business Finland, a 50 per cent contribution to 
a budget of Euros 224,900. The funds will be 
a budget of Euros 224,900. The funds will be 
used for graphite purification and spheroidization 
used for graphite purification and spheroidization 
test work, and the further assessment of 
test work, and the further assessment of 
Fennoscandian’s graphite for battery applications.
Fennoscandian’s graphite for battery applications.

Business Finland has been granted Euros 10 
Business Finland has been granted Euros 10 
million funding for a project titled “BATCircle - 
million funding for a project titled “BATCircle - 
the development of a Finland-based Circular 
the development of a Finland-based Circular 
the development of a Finland-based Circular 
the development of a Finland-based Circular 
Ecosystem of Battery Metals”.  BATCircle is part 
Ecosystem of Battery Metals”.  BATCircle is part 
of the European Union (“EU”) Strategic Energy 
of the European Union (“EU”) Strategic Energy 
Technology Programme, where Finland, under the 
Technology Programme, where Finland, under the 
leadership of Aalto University and Outotec, will 
leadership of Aalto University and Outotec, will 
coordinate research into battery recycling. The 
coordinate research into battery recycling. The 
national BATCircle consortium includes a total 
national BATCircle consortium includes a total 
of 22 companies, four universities, two research 
of 22 companies, four universities, two research 
institutes and two cities.

18

18

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

19
19

 
 
Permits 

Beowulf, via its subsidiaries, currently holds five exploration permits, 
together with one registered application for an Exploitation Concession, as 
set out in the table below: 

Permit Name 
/Minerals 

Permit ID  Area (km2) 

 Valid from 

Valid until 

Åtvidaberg  
nr1 (Pb,Zn,Cu, Ag)2  2016:51 

125.32 

30/05/2016 

30/05/2019

Ågåsjiegge  
nr2 (Fe)1,4 

Kallak  
nr1 (Fe)1,3 

Parkijaure  
nr2 (Fe)1 

Parkijaure  
nr6 (Fe)1 

2014:10 

11.14 

24/02/2014 

24/02/2020

2006:197        5.00 

28/06/2006 

28/06/2021

2008:20 

2.85 

18/01/2008 

18/01/2023

2019:81 

2.85 

10/10/2019 

10/10/2022

Notes: 
(1) held by the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Jokkmokk Iron Mines AB (“JIMAB”). 

(2) held by the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Beowulf Mining Sweden AB. 

(3)  an application for the Exploitation Concession was lodged on 25 April 2013 (Mines Inspector Official 

Diary nr 559/2013) and an updated, revised and expanded application was submitted in April 2014. On 
21 September 2016, the Company submitted a letter to the Mining Inspectorate of Sweden, revising its 
application boundary to encompass both the Concession Area, delineated by the Kallak North orebody, 
and the activities necessary to support a modern and sustainable mining operation. 

(4) Renewal application submitted.

N
E
D
E
W
S

20
20

 
 
 
Introduction
The Company’s most advanced project is 
the Kallak magnetite iron ore deposit located 
approximately 40 km west of Jokkmokk in the 
County of Norrbotten, Northern Sweden, 80 km 
southwest of the major iron ore mining centre of 
Malmberget, and approximately 120 km to the 
southwest of LKAB’s Kiruna iron ore mine. 

The Company is currently going through the 
process of obtaining an Exploitation Concession 
for Kallak North (the “Exploitation Concession”). 
Testwork on Kallak ore has showed that a 
‘super’ high grade magnetite concentrate can be 
produced, yielding over 71 per cent iron content, 
with low levels of deleterious elements, including 
phosphorous and sulphur, lending itself to 
pelletisation and consumption in DRI facilities  

in Europe and the Middle East, and attracting a 
in Europe and the Middle East, and attracting a 
potential price premium. 

Local infrastructure is excellent. A major 
hydroelectric power station with associated 
hydroelectric power station with associated 
electric powerlines is located only a few kilometres 
electric powerlines is located only a few kilometres 
to the south east of the project area. The nearest 
to the south east of the project area. The nearest 
railway (the Inlandsbanan or ‘Inland Railway 
railway (the Inlandsbanan or ‘Inland Railway 
Line’) passes approximately 40 km to the east. 
Line’) passes approximately 40 km to the east. 
This railway line is connected at Gällivare with the 
This railway line is connected at Gällivare with the 
‘Ore Railway Line’, used by LKAB for delivery of its 
‘Ore Railway Line’, used by LKAB for delivery of its 
iron ore material to the Atlantic harbour at Narvik 
iron ore material to the Atlantic harbour at Narvik 
(Norway) or to the Botnian Sea harbour at Luleå 
(Norway) or to the Botnian Sea harbour at Luleå 
(Sweden).  

Kallak Resource

The Kallak North and Kallak South orebodies are centrally located and cover an area approximately 
3,700 m in length and 350 m in width, as defined by drilling. The mineral resource estimate for Kallak 
North and South is based on drilling conducted between 2010-2014, a total of 131 holes and 27,895m. 
North and South is based on drilling conducted between 2010-2014, a total of 131 holes and 27,895m. 

A resource statement for the Kallak project was finalised on 28 November 2014, following the guidelines 
of the JORC Code 2012 edition, summary as follows:

Project 

Category 

Tonnage 

Mt 

105.9 

  17.0 

  12.5 

  16.8 

118.5 

   33.8 

Kallak North 

Indicated 

Inferred 

Kallak South 

Indicated 

Inferred 

Indicated 

Inferred 

Global 

Notes:

Fe 

% 

27.9 

28.1 

24.3 

24.3 

27.5 

26.2 

P 

% 

0.035 

0.037 

0.041 

0.044 

0.036 

0.040 

S

%

0.001

0.001

0.003

0.005

0.001

0.003

(1) The effective date of the Mineral Resource Estimate is 28 November 2014.

(2) Resources have been classified as Indicated or Inferred, following the guidelines of the JORC Code, 2012 edition.

(3) Cut-off grade of 15 per cent Fe has been used.

(4) Mineral Resource, which is not Mineral Reserves, has no demonstrated economic viability.

(5)  An exploration target of 90-100 Mt at 22-30 per cent Fe represents potential ore below the pit shells modelled for this resource 

statement, and in the gap between drilling-defined Kallak South mineralised zones.

(6)  The resource statement has been prepared and categorised for reporting purposes by Mr. Thomas Lindholm, of GeoVista AB, 

Fellow of the MAusIMM, following the guidelines of the JORC Code, 2012 edition.

20

20

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
An overview of the interpreted 
mineralisation is shown in the 
diagram below.

The mineralised area at Kallak North is 
approximately 1,100 m long, from south to 
north, and, at its widest part in the centre, is 
approximately 350 m wide.

The deepest drill hole intercept is located some 
350 m below the surface in the central part of 
the mineralisation. In the southern and northern 
parts, the intercepts are shallower at 150-200 m. 
However, in the northern part, there are no barren 
holes below them, so the mineralisation could 
continue at depth. 

The investigations at Kallak South have been 
divided into two parts, the northern and southern 
ends, respectively. In the northern part the 
mineralisation extends approximately 750 m 
from north to south and has an accumulated 
width of 350 m. The deepest drill hole intercept 
is located some 350 m below the surface in the 
southern-most part of the mineralisation. In 
the southern part, the mineralisation extends 
approximately 500 m from north to south and has 
a maximum width of just over 300 m. The deepest 
drill hole intercept is located some 200 m to 250 
m below the surface in the central part of the 
mineralisation. 

Approximately 800 m in between the southern 
and northern parts of Kallak South has not been 
investigated by systematic drilling. An exploration 
target of 90 Mt to 100 Mt at 22-30 per cent iron 
has been assigned to the area between the 
southern and northern parts. 

22

2019 Update
Throughout 2019, Beowulf continued to push 
for a decision from the Swedish Government on 
its application for an Exploitation Concession, 
while demonstrating its approach to developing 
an innovative, modern, and sustainable mining 
operation at Kallak. We continued to work with the 
Mayor in Jokkmokk, Norrbotten Regional Council 
Members and Norrbotten Members of Parliament 
to lobby the Government.

In late January, Kurt Budge CEO delivered a 
presentation titled ‘Sustainability in the heart 
- partnership, the lifecycle of mining projects, 
balancing the interest of stakeholders’ at the 
Future Mine and Mineral Conference in Stockholm.

The CEO spoke of the damage Kallak and other 
mining cases are having on Sweden’s reputation 
as a destination for mining investors. On a more 
positive note, the CEO presented Beowulf’s 
approach to sustainable mining and outlined 
how the Company can play its part in ensuring 
that Sweden continues to lead in this area, by 
developing a modern and sustainable mining 
operation at Kallak in partnership with the 
community in Jokkmokk. 

Beowulf continued to support the OECD’s work in 
Sweden, attending the launch of the report on its 
Rural Policy Review ‘Linking the Indigenous Sami 
People with Regional Development in Sweden’, 
having previously participated in the OECD’s land-
use workshop in early 2018.

Later in the year, the CEO attended the third 
OECD Meeting for Mining Regions and Cities, 
organised to enable knowledge sharing, with a 
focus on developing policy recommendations and 
standards that can help maximise the benefits 
that mining can bring to a region or city. 

At the meeting, learnings from past situations 
and experiences, what works and what does not 
work, and ongoing challenges, such as gaining 
acceptance by communities when it comes to 
mining development and the importance of 
engaging with indigenous communities, were 
discussed.  In addition, global trends were 
presented, including the ‘Circular Economy’ and 
the adoption of ‘Clean Energy’, and the impacts 
that these could have on the future demand for 
minerals and metals.

In the context of all these ideas, the Company’s 
Kallak project is an ideal candidate for bringing 
together the best of thinking into the development 
of a modern and sustainable mining project, that 

could transform a community and a region, while 
could transform a community and a region, while 
leveraging the mining heritage and harnessing the 
leveraging the mining heritage and harnessing the 
innovation that Norrbotten and Sweden possess.
innovation that Norrbotten and Sweden possess.

Following Almedalen in July, the Company outlined 
its immediate three-step plan for advancing 
the Kallak project, in the event the Swedish 
Government awards the Concession:

1

2

3

Scoping Study - completion 
within 12 months of the 
Concession being awarded - and 
in parallel develop a roadmap for 
environmental permitting.

Formation of a ‘Development 
Taskforce’ with Jokkmokks 
Kommun and other key partners 
with an interest in Kallak, 
such that the development of 
Kallak and the opportunity to 
regenerate Jokkmokk can be fully 
coordinated.

To advance discussions with 
the Sami reindeer herding 
communities, to listen to their 
concerns, find solutions together 
to problems that might exist, 
working towards reaching 
mutually beneficial agreements 
that ensure Sami reindeer 
herding, livelihoods and culture 
are protected, and that Sami 
communities benefit from the 
development of a mine at Kallak.

During the year, Beowulf continued to support 
SME development in Jokkmokk and, in the event 
that the Concession for Kallak is awarded, 
has pledged an additional SEK 300,000 to the 
Collaboration Agreement (the “Agreement”) it 
has with Jokkmokks Allmänning (“Allmänning”).  
Beowulf has previously invested SEK 500,000 in 
the partnership Agreement with Allmänning and is 
pleased to continue to support SME development 
in Jokkmokk.

The main purpose of the existing Agreement is 
to invest funds and support the development 
of SMEs in Jokkmokk. The funds will match 
Allmänning’s investment in Jokkmokks Log, a 
sustainable construction company, which uses 
Allmänning timber production for wooden building 
construction. Jokkmokks Log, which is adding 
value to locally produced raw materials, could 
provide opportunities for training local apprentices, 
and thereafter employment as its business grows. 

Exploring Iron Ore Potential  
at Parkijaure
Beowulf is a partner in the European Union (“EU”) 
funded PACIFIC Project (“PACIFIC”), launched 
in June 2018.   The project has received €3.2 
million from the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and 
innovation programme and has a 36-month 
programme of activities being coordinated by 
Université Grenoble Alpes.

The aim of PACIFIC is to develop a new low-cost 
and environmentally friendly tool for exploring 
for sub-surface mineral deposits. The PACIFIC 
consortium is conducting fundamental and 
applied research to develop two radically new and 
complementary mineral exploration techniques, 
both based on passive seismic imagery.   

Kallak, including Kallak North, Kallak South and 
the Parkijaure licence, has been chosen as one of 
two PACIFIC test sites.

In September, Phase 1 work was carried out at 
Kallak, which included testing the multi-array 
method, using an array of receivers at surface, 
over the known magnetite ore at Kallak South to 
provide background data, the seismic properties 
for the iron ore and to correlate findings with the 
geological model for Kallak.

In Autumn 2020, Phase 2 work will commence 
testing the multi-array method in parallel with 
drilling at Kallak South, with noise from drilling 
providing a passive seismic source. Testwork 
will determine if a 3D seismic model can be 
constructed, using the established seismic 
characteristics of the Kallak deposit, and whether 
the 3D model can be used to identify previously 
undiscovered magnetite mineralisation for the 
Kallak South Exploration Target areas and for 
Parkijaure. The Company would then consider 
further drilling.

22

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

23

In October, the Company was awarded an 
Exploration Licence for Parkijaure nr 6, covering 
almost 1,000 hectares immediately to the south of 
the Kallak deposits, and similarly prospective for 
magnetite iron ore.

Communications with the 
Swedish Government  
During the year, the Company communicated with 
the government on numerous occasions, regarding 
the Company’s application for an Exploitation 
Concession. 

In April, Göran Färm Chairman wrote to Minister 
Baylan regarding the Kallak application. The 
letter reminded the Minister that since the 
Company first submitted its application in 2013, 
the case has been sent back and forth between 
Swedish authorities and the Government, finding 
themselves unable to award an Exploitation 
Concession for Europe’s largest drill defined iron 
ore deposit, a potential global resource of 250 
million tonnes of iron ore.  

The first exploration permit for Kallak was granted 
by the Mining Inspectorate in 2006, and, since 
that time, Swedish authorities have permitted the 
Company to invest over SEK 80 million to date. 
While the Kallak project suffers delay after delay, 
LKAB, the state iron ore company, warned in 
October 2018 that the ore in the Kiruna mine will 
be depleted earlier than expected.  This placed the 
media spotlight on the future of LKAB’s operations 
and the strategic importance of iron ore to 
Sweden. Further highlighting the absurdity of the 
Kallak situation.  

In communication with the Government, it was 
confirmed that the Kallak application was being 
prioritised and acknowledged that the Company 
had been waiting an excessive period of time for a 
decision.  On this basis, the Company reasonably 
expected, that a decision would be taken, by the 
Government, before the summer or 2019.

In May, the Chairman and the CEO met with Mr. 
Emil Högberg, State Secretary to the Minister, 
to again make a case for the Concession being 
awarded. The State Secretary closed the 
meeting acknowledging the importance of the 
Kallak project to Jokkmokk. After the summer, 
the Chairman followed up again with the State 

Secretary to ensure the Government had all 
the information it needed with respect to our 
application. 

In September, the CEO wrote to Minister Baylan, 
following meetings with advisors, including legal 
advisors, and the new CEO at SveMin, asking for 
a meeting and clarity on the process and timeline 
to a decision by the Government. In response, 
Minister Baylan explained that the CEO’s request 
for a meeting at the time “concerns a forthcoming 
Government decision - a dossier that is currently 
under preparation”, and that the Government is 
unable to meet or comment with regard to its 
“ongoing review”.

The Company engaged legal firm Mannheimer 
Swartling to work with Fröberg & Lundholm to 
review its Kallak application.  Specifically, to review 
statements by the County Administrative Board 
for the County of Norrbotten (“CAB”), including the 
CAB’s statement made in November 2017, and the 
Company’s comments to the Swedish Government 
criticising that statement. The findings of the legal 
analysis were unequivocal, that the Company has 
robustly argued its case for a Concession to be 
awarded.   
In November, the Company submitted a 
concluding statement (the “Statement”) for 
Kallak, prepared by Mannheimer Swartling and 
Fröberg & Lundholm, to the Government.  The 
Statement stressed that, as has previously 
been demonstrated by the Company, and 
acknowledged by the CAB, the establishment of 
a mine at Kallak would have significant positive 
effects on the local economy: creating jobs, 
generating tax revenues for Jokkmokk municipality, 
and stimulating and diversifying the business 
sector in Jokkmokk. In so doing, Kallak would help 
solve the problems Jokkmokk is facing, a lack of 
investment in new enterprise and job creation, 
and a declining and ageing population, which is 
placing a financial burden on Jokkmokks Kommun 
that it cannot afford to bear.

The Statement notes that neither the 
Reindeer Herding Impact Assessment, nor the 
Environmental Impact Assessment have concluded 
that mining operations at Kallak would threaten 
the existence and livelihoods of local Sami reindeer 
herding communities. Furthermore, the Statement 
highlights the similarities between Kallak and 

24

 
In May 2020, the Company awarded a drilling 
contract for up to 1,650 metres diamond 
drilling, targeting additional potential iron 
ore mineralisation at Kallak South.  The work 
programme will determine if a 3D seismic model 
can be constructed, using the established seismic 
characteristics of the Kallak deposit.  The work is 
being undertaken as part of the European Union 
funded PACIFIC Project.  

In June 2020, the CEO wrote again to Minister 
Baylan, after a Parliamentary Question had been 
put to the Minister by a member of Parliament, 
asking when a decision will be taken on Kallak.  
The CEO reminded Minister Baylan, that when the 
Minister spoke at the Mining Nordic Day in Toronto 
in early March, he saved his biggest welcome for 
investors and said that the CEO was welcome 
to do business in Sweden. In the letter, the CEO 
stated that Beowulf is unable to do business in 
Sweden, because the Company cannot get a 
decision on Kallak from the Government.

The SGU, a Government Office, first discovered 
Kallak in the 1940s, designated it an Area of 
National Interest in 2013 and produced its latest 
study, headlined ‘New light on iron ore at Kallak’, in 
study, headlined ‘New light on iron ore at Kallak’, in 
May 2020.  Kallak has been on the SGU’s radar for 
May 2020.  Kallak has been on the SGU’s radar for 
80 years!  Bergsstaten (the “Mining Inspectorate”), 
80 years!  Bergsstaten (the “Mining Inspectorate”), 
part of the SGU, recommended to the Government 
part of the SGU, recommended to the Government 
in October 2015, that the Concession for Kallak 
should be awarded, and last October awarded an 
should be awarded, and last October awarded an 
Exploration Permit for Parkijaure nr 6.

available case law, which support the approval of 
the Concession.

In December, the CEO wrote again to Minister 
to Minister Baylan. The CEO requested that the 
Government provide Beowulf with details on when 
the Company can expect the decision on Kallak 
to be taken. No response was received before the 
year-end.

Post-Year end
In January 2020, the CEO contributed to a 
‘Roundtable on mining in northern Sweden’ 
hosted by Länsstyrelsen Norrbotten, Länsstyrelsen 
Västerbotten, Boliden and LKAB.  At the meeting 
in Luleå, the Government was represented by 
the State Secretary, who was unable to shed 
any light on the handling of the Company’s 
application by the Government, nor the timing 
of a decision.  At the meeting, the CEO made the 
Company’s viewpoint clear, that any review by the 
Government of Swedish legislation should have no 
impact on permit applications in the system that 
have been waiting years for a decision.

A response to the CEO’s letter sent in December 
2019 to Minister Baylan arrived in February 2020, 
in which the State Secretary stated that the 
Government was not able to comment on when 
a decision is expected to be taken, however, the 
Government had taken careful note of information 
provided. 

During the month, the CEO participated in a 
meeting discussing the ‘Mining industry and 
indigenous peoples: regulations, best practice and 
social innovation’. On this subject, the inclusion 
of Sami in regional development in Sweden, 
permitting, sustainable mining, supply chain 
transparency, the Green Economy and the Fossil 
Free Economy, Beowulf is an active participant 
and contributor to the debate

Also, the Board met in Stockholm to discuss the 
continuing and unacceptable delays in getting a 
decision form the Swedish Government for Kallak.  
The Board was already in receipt of a paper 
detailing options, prepared by the Company’s 
lawyers, and actively considering ring-fencing 
funds for legal action. All options to take legal 
action remain under active consideration. 

24

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

25
25

 
Board of Directors

Göran Färm - Non-Executive Chairman
Mr Färm joined Beowulf as Non-Executive Chairman in October 2017.

Göran, born in 1949, was an elected Member of European Parliament (“MEP”) from 1999 to 2004 and, 
then again, from 2007 to 2014. Göran was also Deputy Mayor of Norrköping during the 1990s.

Göran has experience in industrial policy as a former Head of the Swedish Trade Union Confederation’s 
unit for economic policy and investigation, as head of business issues in the City of Norrköping and as 
former MEP of the Committee of Industry, Research, and Energy of the European Parliament.

Göran has extensive experience in communications as a former journalist, Director of Information at 
Riksbyggen, and as a public affairs advisor.

In 2015, Göran was elected as Chairman of Kommuninvest, a public development bank owned by 
Swedish municipalities, cities, and regions. 

Kurt Budge - Chief Executive Officer  
MBA MEng ARSM
Mr Budge was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Beowulf Mining in October 2014 after joining the 
Company as a Non-Executive Director in September 2014.

Kurt has over 20 years’ experience in the mining sector, during which he spent five years as a Business 
Development Executive in Rio Tinto’s Business Evaluation Department. Here he was engaged in mergers 
and acquisitions, divestments and evaluated capital investments. He has also been an independent 
advisor to junior mining companies on acquisitions and project development as well as a General 
Manager of Business Development, where he developed strategic growth and merger and acquisition 
options for iron ore assets.

Kurt was Vice President of Pala Investments AG, a mining focused private equity firm based in 
Switzerland, and has worked as a mining analyst in investment research.

During the earlier part of his career he held several senior operations and planning roles in the UK 
coal industry with RJB Mining (UK Coal plc) and worked as a Venture Capital Executive with Schroder 
Ventures.

Kurt holds an M. Eng (Hons) degree in Mining Engineering from The Royal School of Mines, Imperial 
College London, and an MBA from London Business School. 

Christopher Davies - Non-Executive Director 
BSc Hons Geology, MSc DIC Mineral Exploration
Mr Davies joined the board of Beowulf as a Non-Executive Director in April 2016. Chris, who is a Fellow 
of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, is an exploration/economic geologist with more 
than 30 years’ experience in the mining industry. He has substantial knowledge of graphite and base 
metals, a particular skill set which will be complimentary to Beowulf’s existing team. He was Manager 
for the exploration and development of a graphite deposit in Tanzania and has been involved with due 
diligence studies on graphite deposits in East Africa and Sri Lanka. 

Chris has worked as a geologist in many different parts of the world including Africa, Australia, Yemen, 
Indonesia, and Eastern Europe. His most recent role was as a Consultant to an Australian Group seeking 
copper-gold assets in Africa where he carried out technical due diligence and negotiated commercial 
terms for joint venture partnerships. Chris was Operations Director of African Eagle until March 2012 
and Country Manager for SAMAX Resources in Tanzania, which was acquired by Ashanti Goldfields in 
1998 for US$135 million.

26

 
 
Senior Management

Liam O’Donoghue - Company Secretary 
Mr O’Donoghue is a qualified corporate lawyer and director of the AIM specialist advisory and 
administration firm, ONE Advisory Group Limited. 

Rasmus Blomqvist - Exploration Manager 
Mr. Blomqvist, the founder of Fennoscandian, was appointed Exploration Manager in January 2016. Mr. 
Blomqvist has been working in exploration and mining geology for over 11 years and holds an MSc in 
Geology and Mineralogy from Åbo Akademi University, Turku Finland. 

Since 2012, Mr. Blomqvist has been exploring for flake graphite within the Fennoscandian shield and 
is one of the most experienced graphite geologists in the Nordic region. Prior to Fennoscandian, Mr. 
Blomqvist was Chief Geologist for Nussir ASA, managing its exploration team and achieving significant 
exploration success for the company. 

Prior to Nussir, Mr. Blomqvist worked as an independent consultant for several international mining 
companies including Mawson Resources, Tasman Metals and Agnico Eagle and has experience in 
graphite, gold, base metals and iron ore, within the Nordic region. 

Mr Blomqvist is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (“AusIMM”). The 
Directors present their strategic report for the year ended 31 December 2019.

26

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

27

 
Strategic Report

Principal Activity 

Review Of The Business

The principal activities of the Group are the 
exploration and development for iron ore, graphite 
and other prospective minerals in the Nordic 
Region and Kosovo. A detailed review of the mining 
activities can be found under Review of Operations 
and Activities. The Group is registered in and 
controlled from the United Kingdom. 

The results of the Group for the year are set out 
in the consolidated income statement and show 
a loss after taxation attributable to the owners of 
the parent for the year of £249,192 (2018: Loss 
of £1,373,936). A comprehensive review of the 
business is given under the Chairman’s Statement 
and Review of Operations and Activities.

Principal Risks And Uncertainties

The principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group are detailed below: 

Description

Not obtaining an Exploitation Concession at Kallak North 

Risk 

The Company does not meet the requirements of the prescribed  
process for an Exploitation Concession

HIGH

In July 2015, the CAB supported the Company’s application, and in October 2015 the 
Mining Inspectorate recommended that the concession be awarded. In its November 
2017 statement, the CAB recommended that a Concession is not awarded, but failed 
to use the socio-economic assessment criteria set out in the Environmental Code for 
applications such as ours, which put emphasis on safeguarding investment and job 
creation, and giving consideration for the municipalities’ financial health. The CAB also 
contradicted its July 2015 position, when it supported the economic case for Kallak.  It is 
the Board’s opinion that the Company has fully met the requirements of the prescribed 
application process, Swedish Minerals Act and Environmental Code. The Company has 
the support of the Mayor of Jokkmokk, landowners’ association and local entrepreneurs 
who have lobbied the Government for the award of the Concession.  Kallak would have 
a positive transformational economic effect on Jokkmokk, the importance of which the 
Government has acknowledged.

MEDIUM

Risk rating  

pre-mitigation

Mitigating action 

Risk rating  

post-mitigation

28

 
Description

Risk 

Risk rating  

pre-mitigation

Mitigating action 

Risk rating  

post-mitigation

Description

Risk 

Risk rating  

pre-mitigation

Mitigating action 

Risk rating  

post-mitigation

Description

Risk 

Risk rating  

pre-mitigation

Mitigating action 

Risk rating  

post-mitigation

Revocation of licences

Licences are subject to conditions which, if not satisfied,  
may lead to the revocation of the licence

MEDIUM

The Company diligently manages its licences to ensure full compliance.   
A monthly status report is generated for monitoring purposes and action.

LOW

Non-operator of subsidiary 

Lack of control and oversight on entity spend

LOW

Budgets are provided by the entity on request. Funds invested are designated  
for specific project use. Company CEO holds position as a director. 

LOW

Unable to raise sufficient funds 

Unable to raise sufficient funds to invest in  
project portfolio and cover corporate costs

MEDIUM

Effectively communicate to the market.  Raise capital in a timely manner, as record of 
accomplishment shows. Ensure forecasting is accurate, and expenditure controls are 
in place to optimise cash resources. 

MEDIUM

28

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

29

 
Long term adverse changes in Commodity prices

Prices for iron ore, graphite, and other commodities may affect the viability of the 
Company’s projects

MEDIUM

The Company identifies and invests in high quality projects that are attractive to the 
market. The Company will manage capital and operating expenditures to maximise 
shareholder returns. In the Nordic region, COVID-19 has not had a material effect on 
the mining sector, with mines continuing to operate.  In Kosovo, Vardar has continued 
with exploration activities. The economic slowdown caused by the pandemic is 
anticipated to reverse, once COVID-19 is brought under control. In June 2020, 
benchmark iron ore prices rose to over $100/tonne.

MEDIUM

Not discovering an economic mineral deposit

Very few projects go through to be developed into mines

HIGH

Early studies and testwork give confidence that the Company is allocating capital 
appropriately. In Kallak and Aitolampi we have potential quality resources, benefitted 
by excellent local infrastructure, and established low-risk mining countries.

MEDIUM TO LOW

Description

Risk 

Risk rating  

pre-mitigation

Mitigating action 

Risk rating  

post-mitigation

Description

Risk 

Risk rating  

pre-mitigation

Mitigating action 

Risk rating  

post-mitigation

30

 
 
 
Performance Measurement 
The ongoing performance of the Company is 
managed and monitored using a number of key 
financial and non-financial indicators (“KPIs”) on a 
monthly basis: 

Financial:

i. Administration Expenses 

Overheads are managed versus budget and 
forecast on a monthly basis. The Company has 
a history of tightly managing its expenses. The 
underlying group overhead expenses increased 
in the year to £1,024,386 (2018: £794,851), the 
increase was largely attributable to the inclusion 
of £248,836 losses of Vardar being consolidated 
for the first time. 

ii. Cash position

Cash is vital for an exploration company and 
it must be managed accordingly. Monthly, the 
Company, analyses the expenditure of each 
subsidiary. It also manages monthly cash flow 
for the Group versus budget and forecast. 
The financial strategy is to ensure that the 
Company at a minimum has sufficient funds to 
undertake it’s committed expenditure and meet 
its financial obligations. The Group demonstrates 
a commitment to financial stability as shown by 
a year-end cash position of £1.12 million (2018: 
£1.53 million).    

iii. Exploration expenditure by project

The Company controls its exploration spend 
by project versus budget and in relation to 
its available cash resources. If the results of 
exploration do not meet expectations, then 
budgeted activities are re-evaluated or even 
cancelled. Evaluation of early stage projects is 
approached in a cost-effective way. The Group 
determines whether there are any indicators of 
impairment of its exploration assets on an annual 
basis. This approach is best evidenced through the 
oversight at a board level and reporting level of 
operations where the Company is not the operator 
decision to impair several an early stage project in 
the current year, in order to preserve resources.

Non-financial:

iv. Licence renewal compliance 

It is important from a risk management 
perspective that the Company monitors the expiry 
dates of its exploration permits. This is managed 
internally for its Finnish graphite permits while, in 
Sweden, the Company uses an external service 
provider to report on the status of its permits and 
assist with renewal applications, and in Kosovo, 
works closely with Vardar management to ensure 
that licences are maintained in good standing.

30

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

31

 
 
 
 
S172 Statement 
The Board of Beowulf is aware that the decisions 
we make may affect the lives of many people. 
The Board makes a conscious effort to try and 
understand the interests of our stakeholders, and 
to reflect them in the choices we make in creating 
long-term sustainable success for the business.

The Board views engagement with our 
shareholders and wider stakeholder groups as 
essential work. We are aware that we need 
to listen to each stakeholder group, so that we 
can understand specific interests, and foster 
effective and mutually beneficial relationships. By 
understanding our stakeholders, we can build their 
needs into the decisions we take. 

Throughout this Annual Report, we provide 
examples of how we:

-  Consider the likely consequences of long-term 

decisions;

-  Foster relationships with stakeholders;

-  Understand our impact on our local community 

and the environment; and

-  Demonstrate the importance of behaving 

responsibly.

This section serves as our section 172 statement 
and should be read in conjunction with the 
Strategic Report and the Company’s Corporate 
Governance Statement. Section 172 of the 
Companies Act 2006 requires Directors to act in a 
way that they consider, in good faith, would most 
likely promote the success of the Company for 
the benefit of its members as a whole, taking into 
account the factors listed in s172. The Directors 
continue to have regard to the interests of the 
Company’s employees and other stakeholders, 
including the impact of its activities on the 
community, the environment and the Company’s 
reputation, when making decisions. Acting in 
good faith and fairly between members, the 
Directors consider what is most likely to promote 
the success of the Company for its members in the 
long term. 

The Board regularly reviews our principal 
stakeholders and how we engage with them. The 
stakeholder voice is brought into the boardroom 
throughout the annual cycle through information 
provided by management and also by direct 
engagement with stakeholders themselves. The 
relevance of each stakeholder group may increase 
or decrease depending on the matter or issue in 
question, so the Board seeks to consider the needs 
and priorities of each stakeholder group during its 
discussions and as part of its decision making. 

The following table acts as our s172(1) statement 
by setting out the key stakeholder groups, their 
interests and how Beowulf has engaged with 
them over the reporting period. However, given 
the importance of stakeholder focus, long-term 
strategy and reputation, these themes are also 
discussed throughout this Annual Report.

32
32

 
 
Stakeholder

Their interests

How we engage

 Investors

• Business sustainability 
• High standard of governance 
•  Comprehensive review of 

financial performance of the 
business 

• Success of the business 
• Ethical behaviour
•  Awareness of long-term 
strategy and direction 

•  Improving market perception of 

the business 

•  Delivering long term value to 

shareholders 

• Interim and Annual Report 
•  Investor Relations section on the Company 

website 

• RNS announcements 
• Trading updates 
•  Option to receive news releases directly from 

Beowulf by email 
•  Shareholder circulars 
• AGM 
• Stock exchange announcements 
• Press releases 
•  Board encourages open dialogue with the 

Company’s investors

•  Key contact on the Board for shareholder liaison

Regulatory 

bodies

• Compliance with regulations 
• Worker pay and conditions 
• Health and Safety
• Brand reputation 
• Waste and environment 
• Insurance
• Environmental protection 

Environment

• Sustainability
• Energy usage
• Recycling 
• Waste Management 

Community 

• Community outreach 
• Human Rights 
• Sustainability 

• Company website 
• Stock exchange announcements
• Annual Report 
• Direct contact with regulators 
•  Compliance updates at Board Meetings
• Consistent risk review
•  Ongoing communication with the Swedish 

Government 

•  Engagement with the Mining Inspectorate of 

Sweden 

•  Monthly KPI’s on licence renewal compliance 

•  Oversight of corporate responsibility plans 
•  Adhere to Local Minerals Acts and Environmental 

Codes 

• Participation in the OECD’s ‘Linking the Indigenous 

Sami People with Regional Development in 
Sweden’ project 

•  Engagement with the Sami reindeer herder 

representatives

•  Communication with Sametinget members 
•  Meeting with key community representatives
•  Partnering with the communities in which we 
operate - sharing plans/ideas for discussion 

Contractors

• Terms and conditions of contract 
• Health and safety 
• Human rights and modern slavery

• Anti-Bribery Policy 
• Whistle-blower Policy 

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD:

Mr K Budge, Director 
28 July 2020

32

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

33

Report of the Directors

Management is closely monitoring commercial 
and technical aspects of the Group’s operations 
to mitigate risk and believes the Group will have 
access to sufficient working capital to continue 
operations for the foreseeable future.

These conditions indicate the existence of a 
material uncertainty which may cast significant 
doubt over the Group’s and the Company’s ability 
to continue as a going concern and that it may 
be unable to realise its assets and discharge 
its liabilities in the normal course of business. 
The financial statements do not include any 
adjustments that would result if the Company was 
unable to continue as a going concern. 

Directors’ and Officers’ 
Indemnity Insurance 
The Group has made qualifying third-party 
indemnity provisions for the benefit of its Directors 
and Officers. These were made during the period 
and remain in force at the date of this report. 
Further details of these agreements can be found 
in the Remuneration Report on page 37.

Significant Shareholdings
The Directors are aware of the following interests, 
directly or indirectly, in three per cent or more of the 
Group’s ordinary shares on 31 December 2019: 

Shareholders 

Shares 

%

Interactive  
Investor Services  
Nominees Limited  
- A/C SMKTNOMS  

30,164,253 

5.00

HSDL (Nominees) Limited   22,972,532  

3.81

Hargreaves Lansdown  
(Nominees) Limited 

Interactive Investor  
Services Nominees Limited  
- A/C SMKTISAS 

20,329,020  

3.38

19,588,043 

3.25

Directors 
Since 1 January 2019, the following Directors  
have held office: 

Mr K R Budge 
Mr C Davies   
Mr G Färm  

Dividends 
No dividends will be distributed for the year ended  
31 December 2019 (2018: Nil).

Going Concern 
At 31 December 2019, the Group had a cash 
balance of £1.12 million (2018: £1.53 million)

Management have prepared cash flow forecasts 
which indicate that although there is no immediate 
funding requirement, the Group will need to raise 
further funds in the next 12 months for corporate 
overheads and to advance its projects. 

The Directors are confident they are taking all 
necessary steps to ensure that the required finance 
will be available, and they have successfully raised 
equity finance in the past. They have therefore 
concluded that it is appropriate to prepare the 
financial statements on a going concern basis. 
However, while they are confident of being able 
to raise the new funds as they are required, there 
are currently no agreements in place, and there 
can be no certainty that they will be successful in 
raising the required funds within the appropriate 
timeframe.

Management has implemented logistical and 
organisational changes to underpin the Group’s 
resilience to the impact felt by the COVID-19 
pandemic, with the key focus being protecting all 
personnel, minimising the impact on critical work 
streams and ensuring business continuity. The 
effect on the economy may impact in the Group in 
varying ways, which could lead to a direct bearing 
on the Group’s ability to generate future cash flows 
for working capital purposes. The inability to gauge 
the length of such disruption further adds to this 
uncertainty. For these reasons, the generation 
of sufficient operating cash flows remain a risk. 

34

 
 
 
 
 
Authority to Issue Shares
Each year at the AGM the Directors seek authority to 
allot shares. The authority, when granted, lasts until 
the next AGM (unless renewed, varied or revoked by 
the Company prior to, or on, such date). At the AGM 
held on 29 June 2019, shareholders gave authority 
for the Directors to allot equity securities for cash up 
to an aggregate nominal value of £1,471,598 (2018: 
£1,340,768). 

Significant Agreements 
The Companies Act 2006 requires the Company 
to disclose any significant agreements which take 
effect, alter or terminate upon a change of control 
of the Company. The Company is not aware of, or 
party to, any such agreement.

Events After The Reporting 
Period
Information relating to events since the end of the 
year is given in Note 24 to the financial statements.

Financial Risk Management 
Objectives and Policies
Financial risk management policies and objectives 
for capital management are provided within Note 21 
to the financial statements.

Future Developments Within 
the Business
Beowulf’s strategy is to build a sustainable 
and innovative mining company, which creates 
shareholder value by developing mining assets, 
delivering production, and generating cash flow, 
and in so doing meets society’s ongoing need for 
minerals, metals and economic prosperity. 

Beowulf is developing a high-quality asset base, 
which is diversified by geography and commodity, 
enabling it to simultaneously advance several 
projects up the mining value curve and create 
shareholder value. 

Additionally, the Board of Directors continues 
to look beyond the Company for value creation 
opportunities.

The Company’s first priority remains the award 
of the Exploitation Concession for Kallak North, 
and thereafter completing the Scoping Study.  The 
introduction of a strategic partner/investor who 
understands the value of Kallak as a high-quality 
asset, which could be in production within four to 
five years, is an ongoing consideration, but does not 
preclude the Company from continuing to add value 
to Kallak in the meantime.

Fennoscandian, the Company’s graphite business, 
is pursuing a strategy to develop a ‘resource 
footprint’ of natural flake graphite prospects that 
can provide ‘security of supply’ and enable Finland 
to achieve its ambition of self-sufficiency in battery 
manufacturing.  The Company is a recipient of 
Business Finland funding, which is supporting 
Fennoscandian to move downstream, and develop 
its know-how in processing and manufacturing 
value-added graphite products. 

The Company’s investment in Vardar Minerals 
provides diversification, in geography and 
commodity exposure, to prospective exploration 
opportunities in the Balkan region in Kosovo.  
Mitrovica and Viti projects are both located within 
the Tethyan Belt, a major orogenic metallogenic 
province for gold and base metals which extends 
from the Alps (Carpathians/Balkans) to Turkey, Iran 
and Indochina, and contains several world class 
discoveries.  The Tethyan Belt of south-east Europe 
can be regarded as Europe’s chief copper-gold 
(lead-zinc-silver) province.  

The Company’s investment priorities across its 
portfolio remain subject to funding being available. 

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate 
accounting records that are sufficient to show and 
explain the Company’s transactions and disclose, 
with reasonable accuracy, at any time the financial 
position of the Company and enable them to ensure 
that the financial statements comply with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 2006. They are 
also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the 
Company and hence for taking reasonable steps 
for the prevention and detection of fraud and other 
irregularities.

34

35

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
•  prepare the financial statements on the going 

concern basis unless it is inappropriate to 
presume that the Company will continue in 
business.

Statement as to Disclosure of 
Information to Auditors
So far as the Directors are aware, there is no 
relevant audit information (as defined by Section 
418 of the Companies Act 2006) of which the 
Group’s auditors are unaware, and each Director 
has taken all the steps that they ought to have taken 
as a Director in order to make themselves aware of 
any relevant audit information and to establish that 
the Group’s auditors are aware of that information. 

Auditor
BDO LLP have expressed their willingness to 
continue in office and a resolution to re-appoint 
them will be proposed at the Group’s forthcoming 
Annual General Meeting.

Annual General Meeting
The Notice of Meeting including details of the 
proposed resolutions will be posted to shareholders 
in due course and will appear on the Company’s 
website.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD:

Mr K Budge 
Director  
28 July 2020

Website Publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the 
annual report and financial statements are made 
available on a website.  Financial statements are 
published on the Company’s website in accordance 
with legislation in the United Kingdom governing 
the preparation and dissemination of financial 
statements, which may vary from legislation in 
other jurisdictions.  The maintenance and integrity 
of the Company’s website is the responsibility of the 
Directors.  The Directors’ responsibility also extends 
to the ongoing integrity of the financial statements 
contained therein. 

Directors’ Responsibilities 
Statement
The Directors are responsible for preparing the 
strategic report, annual report and the financial 
statements in accordance with applicable laws and 
regulations. 

Company law requires the Directors to prepare 
financial statements for each financial year.  Under 
that law the Directors have elected to prepare 
the Group and Company financial statements in 
accordance with International Financial Reporting 
Standards (“IFRSs”) as adopted by the European 
Union.  Under company law the Directors must not 
approve the financial statements unless they are 
satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the 
state of affairs of the Group and Company and of 
the profit or loss of the Group for that year.  The 
Directors are also required to prepare financial 
statements in accordance with the rules of the 
London Stock Exchange for companies trading 
securities on the AIM and the rules of the Spotlight 
Exchange in Sweden.  

In preparing these financial statements, the 
Directors are required to:

•  select suitable accounting policies and then apply 

them consistently;

•  make judgements and accounting estimates that 

are reasonable and prudent;

•  state whether they have been prepared in 
accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the 
European Union, subject to any material 
departures disclosed and explained in the financial 
statements; and 

36

 
Remuneration Report

The Directors have chosen to voluntarily present 
an unaudited remuneration report although is 
not required by the Companies Act 2006. Details 
of the Remuneration Committee’s composition 
and responsibilities are set out in the Corporate 
Governance Report on page 39 and its terms of 
reference can be found on the Group’s website: 
beowulfmining.com 

Executive Directors’ terms of 
engagement
Mr Budge is the sole Executive Director and Chief 
Executive Officer. His annual salary was increased 
from £138,000 to £150,000 on 1 January 2019. Mr 
Budge has a notice period of 12 months.

Non-Executive Directors’ terms 
of engagement
The Non-Executive Directors have specific terms of 
engagement under a letter of appointment. Their 
remuneration is determined by the Board. In the 
event that a Non-Executive Director undertakes 
additional assignments or work for the Company, 
this is covered under a separate consultancy 
agreement. 

Mr Davies annual fee is £30,000 per annum. Mr 
Davies has a consultancy agreement with the 
Company for the provision of exploration advice 
over and above his Non-Executive duties. Mr 
Davies has a one month notice period under his 
letter of appointment.

Mr Färm was appointed as Non-Executive 
Chairman on 30 October 2017. Under Mr Färm’s 
letter of appointment, he is paid an equivalent fee 
in Swedish Krona of £33,975 per annum. Mr Färm 
has a one month notice period under his letter of 
appointment.

Indemnity Agreements
Pursuant to the Companies Act 2006 and the 
Company’s articles of association, the Board 
may exercise the powers of the Company to 
indemnify its Directors against certain liabilities, 
and to provide its Directors with funds to meet 
expenditure incurred, or to be incurred, in defending 
certain legal proceedings or in connection with 
certain applications to the court. In exercise of that 
power, and by resolution of the Board on 26 July 
2016, the Company has agreed to enter into this 
Deed of Indemnity with each Director. 

36

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

37

Aggregate Directors’ Remuneration
The remuneration paid to the Directors in accordance with their agreements, during the years ended 31 
December 2019 and 31 December 2018, was as follows: 

Name 

Position 

Salary  
& Fees1 

Share- 
based 
  Payments2 
£ 

£ 

Share  Benefits4  Pension5 
settled  
expense3 
£ 

2019 
Total 

2018
Total
  (audited) (audited)
£
£ 

£ 

£ 

Mr K R Budge  Chief Executive  

Officer 

151,000 

40,208 

10,417 

809 

13,000  215,434  144,387

Mr C Davies  Non-Executive  

Director 

40,750 

36,195 

Mr G Färm  

Non-Executive  
Chairman 

49,596 

- 

- 

- 

- 

76,945  140,561

- 

49,596  27,351

Total 

241,346 

76,403 

10,417 

809 

13,000  341,975  312,299

Notes:

(1)  Does not include expenses reimbursed to the 

(4) Personal life insurance policy

Directors.

(2)  In relation to options granted in year ended 31 

December 2019 and 31 December 2017

(5) Employer contributions to personal pension.

Each Director is also paid all reasonable expenses 

incurred wholly, necessarily, and exclusively in the 

(3)  In relation to shares awarded 31 October 2019 in 

proper performance of his duties. 

lieu of option exercise (refer note 23). 

The beneficial and other interests of the Directors holding office on 31 December 2019 in the issued share 
capital of the Company were as follows: 

Ordinary Shares 

31 December 2019 

31 December 2018

Mr K R Budge 

2,416,426 

2,249,759

As 31 December 2019, all options have vested.

ORDINARY SHARES    
UNDER OPTION 

Mr K R Budge 

Mr K R Budge 

Mr C Davies 

Mr C Davies 

NUMBER 

9,000,000 

3,500,000 

2,500,000 

2,500,000 

EXERCISE 
PRICE

1.66 pence 

7.35 pence 

12 pence 

7.35 pence 

EXPIRY DATE 

17 July 2020

14 January 2024 

26 January 2022 

14 January 2024

ON BEHALF OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE

Göran Färm 

Non-Executive Chairman 

28 July 2020

38

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate Governance 
Report

It is the responsibility as Chairman of the Board 
of Directors of the Company to ensure that the 
Group has both sound corporate governance 
and an effective Board. The Chairman’s principal 
responsibilities are to ensure that the Group 
and the Board are acting in the best interests of 
shareholders, and by making sure that the Board 
discharges its responsibilities appropriately. This 
includes creating the right Board dynamic and 
ensuring that all important matters, strategic 
decisions, receive adequate time and attention at 
Board meetings.  

The Company formally adopted the Quoted 
Companies Alliance Corporate Governance (“QCA 
Code”) in September 2018. This report follows the 
QCA Code guidelines and explains how we have 
applied the guidance. The Board considers that 
the Group complies with the QCA Code so far as 
it is practicable having regard to the size, nature 
and current stage of development of the Company. 
The Board recognises that the Company does not 
fully comply with the 10 principles and general 
provisions of the QCA Code but does use it as a 
benchmark in assessing its corporate governance 
standards. Areas of non-compliance are disclosed 
in the text below. Details of the Company’s 
compliance with the QCA code can be found below 
and in the Corporate Governance section of the 
Company’s website.  

The Board believes that application of the QCA 
Code supports the Company’s medium to long-
term development whilst managing risks, as 
well as providing an underlying framework of 
commitment and transparent communications 
with stakeholders. It also seeks to develop the 
knowledge shared between the Company and its 
stakeholders.  

Strategy, Risk Management 
and Responsibility
A description of the Company’s business model 
and strategy can be found on page 4, and the 
key challenges in their execution can be found on 
pages 29 to 30. 

The Board is responsible for the monitoring of 
financial performance against budget and forecast 
and the formulation of the Group’s risk appetite 
including the identification, assessment and 
monitoring of the Company’s principal risks. The 
Audit Committee (see page 41) has delegated 
responsibility for the oversight of the Company’s 
risk management and internal controls and 
procedures and for determining the adequacy and 
efficiency of internal control and risk management 
systems. The Board continuously monitors and 
upgrades its internal control procedures and risk 
management mechanisms and conducts an annual 
review, when it assesses both for effectiveness. 
This process enables the Board to determine if the 
risk exposure has changed during the year and 
these disclosures are included on pages 29 to 30. 

In setting and implementing the Company’s 
strategies, the Board, having identified the risks, 
seeks to limit the extent of the Company’s exposure 
to them having regard to both its risk tolerance and 
risk appetite. 

Directors 
The Board comprises the Independent Non-
Executive Chairman, Göran Färm; the CEO, Kurt 
Budge; and Independent Non- Executive Director, 
Chris Davies. 

Chris Davies holds no Ordinary Shares and holds 
5,000,000 options over Ordinary Shares. Chris 
Davies has a consultancy agreement in place with 
the Company. Neither Chris Davies nor the other 
Directors believe his options are significant in 
assessing his independence. 

All Directors are encouraged to challenge and 
to bring independent judgement to bear on 
all matters, both strategic and operational. 
Biographical details of the Directors can be found 
on the Group’s website www.beowulfmining.com.

As a Non-executive Director, Chris Davies commits 
approximately between two to four days per 
month.  

As the Independent Non-Executive Chair, Göran 
Färm dedicates approximately between two and 
four days per month. 

38

39

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual ReportThe Board is satisfied that each of the Directors are able to allocate sufficient time to the Group to discharge 
their responsibilities effectively. The number of meetings of the Board and its Committees are outlined below: 

Attendance  
by Directors 

Board 
(5 meetings held) 

Audit 
(1 meeting held) 

Mr K R Budge 

Mr C Davies  

Mr G Färm 

5 

5 

5 

1

1

1

Advisers 
ONE Advisory Limited has been contracted by 
the Company to act as Company Secretary and 
has been given the responsibility for ensuring 
that Board procedures are followed and that 
the Company complies with all applicable rules, 
regulations and obligations governing its operation, 
including assistance with Board and shareholder 
meetings and Market Abuse Regulations (“MAR”) 
compliance. ONE Advisory Limited also supports 
the Board in its development of the Company’s 
corporate governance responsibilities, assisting with 
the Company’s application of the QCA Code and 
amendments in relation to AIM Rule 26. 

The Company’s Nomad is consulted on all matters 
and all Directors have access to independent 
professional advice, if required. 

Neither the Board nor its Committees have sought 
external advice on a significant matter.  

The Directors believe that the Board, as a whole, 
has a broad range of commercial and professional 
skills, enabling it to discharge its duties and 
responsibilities effectively and that the Non-
Executive Directors have a sufficient range of 
experience and skills to enable them to provide 
the necessary guidance, oversight and advice for 
the Board to operate effectively. All Directors are 
encouraged to use their independent judgement 
and to challenge all matters, whether strategic or 
operational.  

The Board annually reviews the appropriateness 
and opportunity for continuing professional 
development, whether formal or informal. The 
Directors also endeavour to ensure that their 
knowledge of best practices and regulatory 
developments is continually up to date by attending 
relevant seminars and conferences.  

The Directors consider that the Company and 
Board are not yet of a sufficient size for a full Board 
evaluation to make commercial and practical sense. 
Therefore, the Board accepts that the Company 
does not comply with this aspect of the QCA Code, 
although in the frequent Board meetings/calls, the 
Directors can discuss any areas where they feel a 
change would be beneficial for the Company, and 
the Company Secretary remains on hand to provide 
impartial advice. As the Company grows, it intends 
to expand the Board and, with expansion, re-
consider the need for a formal Board evaluation.  

40

 
Culture 
The Board recognises that its decisions regarding 
strategy and risk will impact the corporate culture 
of the Company as a whole and that this will 
impact the performance of the Company. The 
Board is aware that the tone and culture set by 
the Board will greatly impact all aspects of the 
Company as a whole. The corporate governance 
arrangements that the Board has adopted are 
designed to ensure that the Company delivers 
long-term value to its shareholders, and that 
shareholders have the opportunity to express 
their views and expectations for the Company in 
a manner that encourages open dialogue with the 
Board. 

A large part of the Company’s activities is centred 
upon an open and respectful dialogue with 
shareholders, contractors, regulators and other 
stakeholders.  Therefore, the importance of sound 
ethical values and behaviours is crucial to the 
ability of the Company to successfully achieve 
its corporate objectives.  The Board places great 
importance on this aspect of corporate life and 
seeks to ensure that this flows through all that the 
Company does.  

The Directors consider that at present the 
Company has an open culture facilitating 
comprehensive dialogue and feedback and 
enabling positive and constructive challenge. 

In addition, the Company makes a point of meeting 
with local communities including local tribes and 
adjacent landowners. 

Audit Committee 
Audit Committee comprises Chris Davies and 
Göran Färm, who chairs the committee. The Audit 
Committee is responsible for ensuring that the 
financial performance, position and prospects of 
the Group are properly monitored and reported on 
and for meeting the auditor and reviewing audit 
reports relating to the accounts.  Meetings of the 
Audit Committee are held at least once a year, at 
appropriate times in the reporting and audit cycle.  
The Audit Committee is required to report formally 
to the Board on its proceedings after each meeting 
on all matters for which it has responsibility. 

The Board notes that additional information 
supplied by the Audit Committee has been 
disseminated across the whole of this Annual 
Report, rather than included as separate 
Committee Reports.  

Remuneration Committee  
The Remuneration Committee comprises Chris 
Davies and Göran Färm, who chairs the committee, 
and meets as required. The Committee is 
responsible for the review and recommendation of 
the scale and structure of remuneration for senior 
management, including any bonus arrangements 
or the award of share options with due regard to 
the interests of shareholders and the performance 
of the Company. A Remuneration Committee 
Report is included on page 37. 

40

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report
2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

41

Independent Auditor’s Report

Opinion 
We have audited the financial statements of 
Beowulf Mining Plc (the ‘Parent Company’) and 
its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) for the year ended 31 
December 2019 which comprise the consolidated 
income statement, the consolidated statement 
of comprehensive income, the consolidated 
and company statements of financial position, 
the consolidated and company statements of 
changes in equity, the consolidated and company 
statements of cash flows and the notes to the 
financial statements including a summary of 
significant accounting policies. 

The financial reporting framework that has 
been applied in the preparation of the financial 
statements is applicable law and International 
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted 
by the European Union and, as regards the Parent 
Company financial statements, as applied in 
accordance with the provisions of the Companies 
Act 2006.

In our opinion:

•  the financial statements give a true and fair view 

of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent 
Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2019 and 
of the Group’s loss for the year then ended;

•  the Group financial statements have been 

properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as 
adopted by the European Union;

•  the Parent Company financial statements have 

been properly prepared in accordance with 
IFRSs as adopted by the European Union and as 
applied in accordance with the provisions of the 
Companies Act 2006; and

•  the financial statements have been prepared 
in accordance with the requirements of the 
Companies Act 2006.

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with 
International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs 
(UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities 
under those standards are further described in 
the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the 
financial statements section of our report. We are 
independent of the Group and the Parent Company 
in accordance with the ethical requirements that 
are relevant to our audit of the financial statements 
in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard 
as applied to listed entities, and we have fulfilled 
our other ethical responsibilities in accordance 
with these requirements. We believe that the 
audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and 
appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Material uncertainty related to 
going concern
We draw attention to note 1 to the financial 
statement which explains that the Group and the 
Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going 
concern is dependent on the ability to raise further 
funds in the next twelve months to enable the 
Group and Parent Company to meet its working 
capital requirements and project commitments.  As 
stated in note 1, these events or conditions indicate 
that a  material uncertainty exists which may 
cast significant doubt over the Group and Parent 
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. 
Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

We considered going concern to be a Key Audit 
Matter based on our assessment of the risk and 
the effect on our audit. We performed the following 
work in response to this Key Audit Matter:

•  We critically assessed Management’s financial 
forecasts and the underlying key assumptions, 
including operating and capital expenditure. 
In doing so, we considered factors such as 
commitments under licenses and whether the 
forecast operating expenditure is reasonable in 
light of historic spend.

•  We reviewed the mathematical accuracy of the 
going concern model prepared by Management 
and the underlying calculations used within it.

42

•    We made enquiries of Management as to the 
future financing options and ability to raise 
funding in the near future and considered these in 
light of Management’s previous ability to secure 
financing for the Group.

•  We evaluated Management’s assessment of 

the potential impact of Covid-19, including their 
assessment of risks and uncertainties associated 
with the impact of the pandemic on the Group’s 
ability to raise finance to fund its operations. In 

performing our evaluation, we formed our own 
view of the impact of the pandemic on the Group 
based on our understanding of the business 
and the exploration industry and compared it 
to management’s assessment to determine the 
reasonableness thereof. 

•  We evaluated the adequacy of disclosure made 
in the financial statements in respect of going 
concern. 

Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most 
significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current year and include the most 
significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) we identified, 
including those which had the greatest effect on the overall audit strategy, the allocation of 
resources in the audit, and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were 
addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming 
our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In addition to 
the matter referred to in the Material uncertainty related to going concern section above, the 
following key audit matters were identified:

42

43

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual ReportKey Audit 
Matter

Carrying value of exploration assets (notes 1 & 7)

The Group’s exploration assets are a material balance on the Group’s balance sheet, 
totalling £10m as at 31 December 2019 (2018: £8.3m). Of this balance, £6.7m 
(2018: £7.1m) relates to the Kallak North project, for which the application for the 
exploitation concession is currently being reviewed by the Swedish Government.

As explained in note 1 of the financial statements the assessment of whether there 
are indicators of impairment in relation to the exploration assets requires the exercise 
of significant judgement by Management and the Directors.

Given the significance of the carrying value of exploration assets and in particular 
the delays in the grant of the exploitation concession for the Kallak North project, 
the assessment of whether there are indicators of impairment for exploration assets 
represented a key area of focus for our audit.

In the current year an impairment provision of £10,720, was made against the Sala 
asset on the basis of no further exploration work would be performed on this  project. 

The Directors have concluded that there were no other indicators of impairment, 
which would result in a further impairment of the exploration assets being required. 
Refer to note 1 for further details regarding their assessment. 

How we 
addressed the 
key audit matter 

We have reviewed  Managements’ assessment of whether there 
were any other indicators of impairment.

Our work in connection with the indicators of impairment included the following:

•  We challenged Management’s assessment and consideration of the evidence to 
support the grant of the exploitation concession for the Kallak North project by 
the government in light of the decision by the Swedish Authorities not to support 
the grant of the concession. This included review of correspondence with various 
Swedish Authorities and an assessment of their views and conclusions, review of 
their points raised during the application process and Management’s response and 
actions thereof and a critical assessment of Management’s views on the Swedish 
Authorities decision to not support the award of the concession.

•  We reviewed RNS announcements, Board minutes, press releases and held 

a number of discussions with Management and have not identified any other 
information or factors which may indicate potential triggers for impairment. 

•  In identifying and assessing indicators of impairment for all licences held we 
assessed the validity of licences by obtaining confirmation from licensing 
authorities. We also assessed planned expenditure on each project, in light of the 
actual outcomes of previously planned expenditure,  and Management’s intention to 
continue exploration work on each licence area.

•  We evaluated the adequacy and appropriateness of the disclosures provided within 

the financial statements.

Key observations:

Based on the work undertaken, we consider Management’s assessment and the 
Directors’ conclusions that there are no indicators of impairment which would result 
in an impairment of the exploration assets being required to be reasonable. 

44

Key Audit 
Matter

Accounting treatment and consolidation of  
Vardar Minerals Limited (notes 1 & 9)

On 1 April 2019 the Group announced the acquisition of Vardar Minerals Limited 
(“Vardar”), an entity in which the Group held a non-controlling interest. A further 
£500,000 investment was made on 1 April 2019 to increase the Group’s shareholding 
from 14.5% to 31.3% at which point in time Management considered control to 
have been obtained. Post 1 April 2019 the Group made further investments totalling 
£465,000 in Vardar during the remainder of the reporting year. 

As explained in note 1 of the financial statements the acquisition of Vardar was 
treated as a business combination under IFRS 3. The accounting treatment of a 
business combination is considered to be judgemental and complex, especially given 
the acquisition was achieved in steps therefore this represented a key area of focus 
for our audit. 

The acquisition resulted in a fair value gain of £563,431 recognised in the income 
statement and intangible assets additions of £1,203,685.

Management determined the fair value of Vardar at acquisition date and accounted 
for this under IFRS 3. They also accounted for all subsequent events post acquisition 
through equity and consolidated Vardar from the date control was obtained, being 
1 April 2019. Refer to notes 1 & 9 for further details regarding the accounting for the 
acquisition and consolidation of Vardar.

How we 
addressed the 
key audit matter 

We reviewed the accounting treatment and consolidation of Vardar 
and ensured that it was reflected appropriately in the financial 
statements and was not materially misstated.

Our work in connection with the above included the following:

•  We reviewed Management’s assessment of the accounting treatment of the 

transaction as a step up acquisition in line with IFRS 3.

•  We obtained the sale and purchase agreement and relevant documentation, 

determined the nature of the investment and evaluated the extent of the Group’s 
control over Vardar. The key focus of our assessment was the Group’s role as 
Investor Director on the Board of Vardar, a role which provides for a casting vote.

•  We assessed the appropriateness of the fair value gain recognised on the step up 
at acquisition. As part of our audit work in this regard we assessed the fair value 
attributed to Vardar by Management at acquisition date, considered whether 
the underlying methodology used was reasonable and determined whether 
we considered it to be materially misstated. We reviewed publically available 
information on the assets held by Vardar, internal technical reporting on the assets, 
the timeline of studies undertaken on the assets and the net assets of the Vardar 
Group at each step up date. 

•  We undertook a full scope audit of Vardar to ensure that opening balances, income 

statement and statement of financial position were not materially misstated.

•  We evaluated the adequacy and appropriateness of the disclosures provided within 

the financial statements.

Key observations:

Based on the work undertaken, we consider the accounting treatment and 
consolidation of Vardar to be materially correct. 

44

45

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual ReportOur application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality both in 
planning and performing our audit, and in 
evaluating the effect of misstatements, including 
omissions, which could influence the economic 
decisions of reasonable users that are taken on the 
basis of the financial statements. In order to reduce 
to an appropriately low level the probability that 
any misstatements exceed materiality,  
we use a lower level materiality, performance 
materiality, to determine the extent of testing 
needed. Importantly, misstatements below 
these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as 
immaterial as we also take account of the nature 
of identified misstatements, and the particular 
circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating 
their effect on the financial statements as a whole.

Materiality for the financial statements as a whole 
was set at £171,000 (2018: £150,000) using a 
benchmark of total assets excluding intercompany 
balances. We considered this to be the most 
significant determinant of the Group’s financial 
performance used by shareholders, as the Group is 
engaged in exploration activities and the principal 
focus of the users is likely to be the Group’s 
gross assets excluding intercompany balances. 
The percentage and benchmark for calculating 
materiality has remained consistent with the prior 
year.

Each significant component of the Group, excluding 
the Parent Company, had an individual materiality 
set at a level lower than Group. This materiality 
was set between the range of £55,000 and 
£110,000. 

The Parent Company materiality was set at 
£132,000 (2018: £100,000) based on 1.5% of total 
assets and reduced to 75% of Group materiality. 

Performance materiality is the application 
of materiality at the individual account or 
balance level set at an amount to reduce to 
an appropriately low level the probability that 
the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected 
misstatements exceed materiality. Performance 
materiality was set at 75% (2018: 75%) of the 
above materiality levels. These materiality levels 
were used to determine the financial statement 
areas that were included within the scope of our 
audit work and the extent of sample sizes during 
the audit.

We agreed at the planning stage with the Audit 
Committee that we would report to the committee 
all individual audit differences identified during 
the course of our audit in excess of £3,200 (2018: 
£7,500). We also agreed to report differences 
below these thresholds that, in our view, warranted 
report on qualitative grounds.

No revisions were made to materiality levels during 
the course of the audit.

46

Other information
The Directors are responsible for the other 
information. The other information comprises the 
information included in the annual report, other 
than the financial statements and our auditor’s 
report thereon. Our opinion on the financial 
statements does not cover the other information 
and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly 
stated in our report, we do not express any form of 
assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial 
statements, our responsibility is to read the other 
information and, in doing so, consider whether 
the other information is materially inconsistent 
with the financial statements or our knowledge 
obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to 
be materially misstated. If we identify such 
material inconsistencies or apparent material 
misstatements, we are required to determine 
whether there is a material misstatement in the 
financial statements or a material misstatement 
of the other information. If, based on the work 
we have performed, we conclude that there is a 
material misstatement of this other information, we 
are required to report that fact. We have nothing to 
report in this regard.

An overview of the scope of 
our audit
Our Group audit scope focussed on the Group’s 
principal operating locations and legal structure. 
The Group has operating entities in the UK, 
Sweden, Finland and it further invested in entities 
in Kosovo during the year. Alongside the audit 
of the Group, we assessed there to be three 
significant components in the current year being 
the Parent Company, Beowulf Mining Plc, with 
operations in the UK, Jokkmokk Iron Mines AB with 
operations in Sweden and Vardar Minerals Limited 
with operations in Kosovo.

The Group, Parent Company and Vardar Minerals 
Limited were subject to a full scope audit by BDO 
LLP, in the UK.

A full scope audit for Group reporting purposes 
was performed by a non-BDO network firm on 
the significant component in Sweden, Jokkmokk 
Iron Mines AB. We reviewed the audit files of 
the component auditor on site in Sweden and 
discussed the findings with the component auditor. 

Specific procedures were completed by a non-BDO 
network firm in Finland on Oy Fennoscandian 
Resources AB, which holds the material Finnish 
assets. We reviewed the audit testing performed 
in respect of Oy Fennoscandian Resources AB and 
discussed the findings with the component auditor. 

We provided Group reporting instructions, which 
included detailed instructions for the testing 
of significant areas,  to each of the component 
auditors.  In addition, as the Group auditor we 
also performed additional audit procedures over 
the significant risk areas of the components. The 
remaining non-significant components of the 
Group were subject to analytical review procedures 
performed by BDO LLP 

46

47

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual ReportOpinions on other matters 
prescribed by the Companies 
Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the 
course of the audit:

•  the information given in the Strategic Report and 
the Directors’ Report for the financial year for 
which the financial statements are prepared is 
consistent with the financial statements; and

•  the strategic report and the Directors’ Report 

have been prepared in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements.

Matters on which we are 
required to report by exception
In the light of the knowledge and understanding 
of the Group and the Parent Company and its 
environment obtained in the course of the audit, we 
have not identified material misstatements in the 
Strategic Report or the Directors’ Report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the 
following matters in relation to which the 
Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, 
in our opinion:

•  adequate accounting records have not been kept 
by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for 
our audit have not been received from branches 
not visited by us; or

•  the Parent Company financial statements are not 
in agreement with the accounting records and 
returns; or

•  certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration 

specified by law are not made; or 

•  we have not received all the information and 

explanations we require for our audit.

Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ 
Responsibilities Statement, within the Report of 
the Directors’ set out on page 36, the Directors 
are responsible for the preparation of the financial 
statements and for being satisfied that they give a 
true and fair view, and for such internal control as 
the Directors determine is necessary to enable the 
preparation of financial statements that are free 
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud 
or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the Directors 
are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the 
Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going 
concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related 
to going concern and using the going concern basis 
of accounting unless the Directors either intend to 
liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to 
cease operations, or have no realistic alternative 
but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities 
for the audit of the financial 
statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance 
about whether the financial statements as a whole 
are free from material misstatement, whether due 
to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report 
that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance 
is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee 
that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs 
(UK) will always detect a material misstatement 
when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and 
are considered material if, individually or in the 
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to 
influence the economic decisions of users taken on 
the basis of these financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the 
audit of the financial statements is located on the 
Financial Reporting Council’s website at: www.
frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description 
forms part of our auditor’s report

48

Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Parent Company’s 
members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 
3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006.  Our 
audit work has been undertaken so that we might 
state to the Parent Company’s members those 
matters we are required to state to them in an 
auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the 
fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept 
or assume responsibility to anyone other than 
the Parent Company and the Parent Company’s 
members as a body, for our audit work, for this 
report, or for the opinions we have formed.

Anne Sayers (Senior Statutory Auditor) 
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor 
London, UK 
28 July 
2020

BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered 
in England and Wales (with registered number 
OC305127).

48

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

49
49

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual ReportConsolidated Income Statement

CONTINUING OPERATIONS 

Administrative expenses 

Impairment of exploration costs 

Share based payment expense 

Share of loss in associates 

Gain on step acquisition 

OPERATING LOSS 

Finance costs 

Finance income 

Grant income 

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX  

Income tax expense 

LOSS FOR THE YEAR 

Loss attributable to: 

Owners of the parent 

Non-controlling interests 

Note 

2019 
£ 

2018 
£

9 

3 

3 

5 

(904,666) 

(598,391)

(10,720) 

(571,456)

(119,720) 

(196,460)

- 

(19,880)

563,431 

-

(471,675) 

(1,386,187)

(410) 

6,298 

37,080 

-

11,603

-

(428,707) 

(1,374,584)

- 

-

(428,707) 

(1,374,584)

(267,000) 

(1,373,936)

(161,707) 

(648)

(428,707) 

(1,374,584)

Loss per share attributable to the ordinary equity holder of the parent: 

Basic and diluted (pence) 

(0.04) 

(0.25)

The notes on pages 60 to 95 form part of these financial statements

50

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement Of Comprehensive Income

LOSS FOR THE YEAR 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: 

Note 

2019 
£ 

2018 
£

(428,707) 

(1,374,584)

Exchange losses arising on translation of foreign operations 

(794,299) 

(123,265)

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS 

(1,223,006) 

(1,497,849)

(794,299) 

(123,265)

Total comprehensive loss attributable to: 

Owners of the parent 

Non-controlling interests 

(1,037,811) 

(1,497,133)

14 

(185,195) 

(716)

(1,223,006) 

(1,497,849)

50

51

The notes on pages 60 to 95 form part of these financial statements

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

ASSETS 
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
Intangible assets 
Property, plant and equipment 
Investment in associate 
Loans and other financial assets  
Right-of-use asset 

CURRENT ASSETS 
Trade and other receivables 
Cash and cash equivalents 

TOTAL ASSETS 

EQUITY 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
Share capital 
Share premium 
Capital contribution reserve 
Share based payment reserve 
Merger reserve 
Translation reserve 
Accumulated losses 

Note 

2019 
£ 

2018 
£

7 
8 
9 
10 
11 

12 
13 

15 
17 
17 
17 
17 
17 
17 

10,011,494 
86,998 
- 
5,212 
7,324 

8,285,547
16,083
230,120
5,462
-

10,111,028 

8,537,212

167,261 
1,124,062 

62,956
1,533,232

1,291,323 

1,596,188

11,402,351  10,133,400

6,022,446 

5,663,072
20,824,009  19,266,271
46,451 
46,451
732,185 
612,465
137,700 
137,700
(520,257)
(1,291,068) 
(15,781,161)  (15,311,933)

10,690,562 

9,893,769

Non-controlling interests 

14 

326,555 

(160,587)

TOTAL EQUITY 

LIABILITIES 
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
Trade and other payables 
Grant Income 
Lease liability 

TOTAL LIABILITIES 

11,017,117 

9,733,182

18 
19 

242,885 
134,877 
7,472 

208,013
192,205
-

385,234 

400,218

TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 

11,402,351  10,133,400

The financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 28 July 2020  
and were signed on its behalf by: Mr K Budge - Director  Company Number 02330496

The notes on pages 60 to 95 form part of these financial statements

52

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company Statement of Financial Position

ASSETS 

NON-CURRENT ASSETS 

Investments 

Loans and other financial assets  

CURRENT ASSETS 

Trade and other receivables 

Cash and cash equivalents 

TOTAL ASSETS 

EQUITY 

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 

Share capital 

Share premium 

Capital contribution reserve 

Share based payment reserve 

Merger reserve 

Accumulated losses 

TOTAL EQUITY 

LIABILITIES 

CURRENT LIABILITIES 

Trade and other payables 

Deferred income 

TOTAL LIABILITIES 

Note 

2019 
£ 

2018 
£

9 

10 

12 

13 

15 

17 

17 

17 

17 

17 

18 

19 

1,697,988 

732,988

8,989,451 

8,222,217

10,687,439 

8,955,205

23,260 

24,401

978,514 

1,470,087

1,001,774 

1,494,488

11,689,213 

10,449,693

6,022,446 

5,663,072

20,824,009 

19,266,271

46,451 

732,185 

137,700 

46,451

612,465

137,700

(16,298,859)  (15,535,429)

11,463,932 

10,190,530

90,404 

66,958

134,877 

192,205

225,281 

259,163

TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 

11,689,213 

10,449,693

As permitted by Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the income statement of the parent Company is not 
presented as part of these financial statements. The parent Company’s loss for the financial year was £763,430 
(2018: Loss £771,039). 

These financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 28 July 2020 and 
were signed on its behalf by: 

Mr K Budge - Director   
Company Number 02330496

The notes on pages 60 to 95 form part of these financial statements

52

53

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

Note 

Share 

capital 

Share 

premium 

Merger 

reserve 

£ 

£ 

£ 

Capital 

contribution 

reserve 
£ 

Share based 

Translation 

Accumulated 

Totals 

Non- 

Totals

payments 

reserve 

losses 

reserve 
£ 

£ 

£ 

£ 

controlling

interest 
£ 

£

AT 1 JANUARY 2018 

5,342,072 

18,141,271 

137,700 

46,451 

575,078 

(397,060) 

(14,079,747) 

9,765,765 

(159,871) 

9,605,894

Loss for the year 

Foreign exchange translation 

Total comprehensive income 

TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Issue of share capital 

300,000 

1,200,000 

Cost of issue 

Share based payment expense 

Issues of shares 

- 

- 

21,000 

(75,000) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

AT 31 DECEMBER 2018 

5,663,072 

19,266,271 

137,700 

46,451 

Loss for the year 

Foreign exchange translation 

Total comprehensive income 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS 

Issue of share capital  

Cost of issue 

15 

15 

Share based payment expense 

Step acquisition of Subsidiary 

357,707 

1,642,293 

- 

1,667 

- 

(93,305) 

8,750 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

196,460 

(159,073) 

612,465 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

119,720 

- 

- 

- 

(123,197) 

(1,373,936) 

(1,373,936) 

(1,497,133) 

(648) 

(716) 

(1,374,584)

(1,497,849)

- 

- 

- 

 - 

- 

- 

- 

141,750 

1,500,000 

(75,000) 

196,460 

   3,677 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1,500,000

(75,000)

196,460

  3,677

(520,257) 

(15,311,933) 

9,893,769 

(160,587) 

9,733,182

- 

(267,000) 

- 

(267,000) 

(770,811) 

(161,707) 

(428,707)

(23,488) 

(794,299)

(267,000) 

(1,037,811) 

(185,195) 

(1,223,006)

(770,811) 

(770,811) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2,000,000 

(93,305) 

130,137 

- 

- 

- 

(202,228) 

(202,228) 

672,337 

2,000,000

(93,305)

130,137

470,109

AT 31 DECEMBER 2019 

6,022,446 

20,824,009 

137,700 

46,451 

732,185 

(1,291,068) 

(15,781,161) 

10,690,562 

326,555 

11,017,117

The notes on pages 60 to 95 form part of these financial statements

54

55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company Statement of Changes in Equity

Note 

Share 

capital 

£ 

Share 

premium 

£ 

Merger 

reserve 

£ 

Capital 

contribution 

reserve 
£ 

Share based 

payments 

Accumulated 

Totals

losses 

£ 

£ 

£

AT 1 JANUARY 2018 

5,342,072 

18,141,271 

137,700 

46,451 

575,078 

(14,906,137) 

9,336,435

Loss for the year 

Total comprehensive income 

- 

- 

- 

- 

TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS 

Issue of share capital 

Cost of issue 

Share based payment expense 

Issue of shares 

AT 31 DECEMBER 2018 

Loss for the year 

Total comprehensive income 

TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS 

Issue of share capital  

Cost of issue 

Share based payment expense 

AT 31 DECEMBER 2019 

15 

15 

16 

15 

15 

16 

300,000 

- 

- 

21,000 

5,663,072 

1,200,000 

(75,000) 

- 

- 

19,266,271 

- 

- 

357,707 

- 

1,667 

6,022,446 

1,642,293 

(93,305) 

8,750 

20,824,009 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

137,700 

46,451 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

137,700 

46,451 

- 

- 

- 

- 

196,460 

(159,073) 

612,465 

- 

- 

- 

119,720 

732,185 

(771,042) 

(771,042)

(771,042) 

(771,042)

- 

- 

- 

141,750 

1,500,000

(75,000)

196,460

3,677

(15,535,429) 

10,190,530

(763,430) 

(763,430)

(763,430) 

(763,430)

- 

- 

- 

2,000,000

(93,305)

130,137

(16,298,859) 

11,463,932

The notes on pages 60 to 95 form part of these financial statements

56

57
57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 

Loss before income tax 
Depreciation charges 
Share based payment expense 
Impairment of exploration costs 
Finance income 
Finance cost 
Grant income 
Gain on step acquisition 
Amortisation of right -of -use asset 
Share of loss in associate 

(Increase) / decrease in trade and other receivables 
Decrease / (increase) in trade and other payables 

Net cash used in operating activities 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 

Purchase of intangible assets 
Purchase of property, plant and equipment 
Sale of investments 
Acquisition of subsidiary / associate 
Cash acquired with subsidiary 
Grant receipt 
Interest received 

Note 

2019 
£ 

2018 
£

4 

4 
3 
3 

(428,707) 
20,971 
130,137 
10,720 
(6,298) 
410 
(37,080) 
(563,431) 
4,615 
- 

(1,374,584)
14,696
196,460
571,456
(11,603)
-
-
-
-
19,880

(868,663) 

(583,695)

(106,009) 
14,930 

2,603
(72,740)

(959,742) 

(653,832)

7 
8 
9 
    9 

(1,304,896) 
(77,615) 
7 
(500,000) 
530,031 
- 
6,298 

(778,495)
(2,515)
13
(250,000)
-
192,205
11,603

Net cash used in investing activities 

(1,346,175) 

(827,189)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 

Proceeds from issue of shares 
Payment of share issue costs 
Lease principal and interest paid 

15 
15 

2,000,000 
(93,305) 
(4,877) 

1,500,000
(75,000)
-

Net cash from financing activities 

1,901,818 

1,425,000

DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes  

(404,099) 
1,533,232 
(5,071) 

(56,021)
1,589,897
(644)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR  

1,124,062 

1,533,232

The notes on pages 60 to 95 form part of these financial statements

58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company Statement of Cash Flows

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 

Loss before income tax 
Expected credit losses 
Share based payment expense 
Finance income 
Grant income 

Decrease in trade and other receivables 
Decrease in trade and other payables 

Note 

2019 
£ 

2018 
£

10 

3 
21 

(763,430) 
158,005 
130,137 
(6,298) 
(1,425) 

(771,042)
161,856
196,460
(11,603)
-

(483,011) 

(424,329)

1,141 
23,443 

15,700
135,883

Net cash used in operating activities 

(458,427) 

(272,746)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
Loans to subsidiaries 
Acquisition of associate / subsidiary 
Interest received 

Net cash used in investing activities 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
Proceeds from issue of shares 
Payment of share issue costs 
Financing of subsidiary 

Net cash from financing activities 

DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  

    9 

15 
15 
9 

(981,139) 
(500,000) 
6,298 

(952,091)
(250,000)
11,603

(1,939,841) 

(1,190,488)

2,000,000  
(93,305) 
(465,000) 

1,500,000
(75,000)
-

1,906,695 

1,425,000

(491,573) 
1,470,087 

(38,234)
1,508,321

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR  

978,514 

1,470,087

58

59

The notes on pages 60 to 95 form part of these financial statements

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

1. 

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of operations

Beowulf Mining plc (the “Company”) is domiciled in England. The Company’s registered office is 201 Temple 
Chambers, 3-7 Temple Avenue, London, EC4Y 0DT. These consolidated financial statements comprise the 
Company and its subsidiaries (collectively the ‘Group’ and individually ‘Group companies’). The Group is 
engaged in the acquisition, exploration and evaluation of natural resources assets and has not yet generated 
revenues.

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set 
out below:

Going concern

At 31 December 2019, the Group had a cash balance of £1.12 million and the Company had a cash balance 
of £0.98 million. Subsequent to year end, the Company has raised £2.0 million (before expenses) cumulatively 
through a series of successful subscriptions.

Management have prepared cash flow forecasts which indicate that although there is no immediate funding 
requirement, the Group will need to raise further funds in the next twelve months for corporate overheads 
and to advance its projects. 

The Directors are confident they are taking all necessary steps to ensure that the required finance is 
available, and they have successfully raised equity finance subsequent to year end. They have therefore 
concluded that it is appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis. However, 
while they are confident of being able to raise the new funds as they are required, there are currently no 
agreements in place, and there can be no certainty that they will be successful in raising the required funds 
within the appropriate timeframe. 

Management has implemented logistical and organisational changes to underpin the Group’s resilience to 
the impact felt by the COVID-19 pandemic, with the key focus being protecting all personnel, minimising the 
impact on critical work streams and ensuring business continuity. The effect on the economy may impact the 
Group in varying ways, which could lead to a direct bearing on the Group’s ability to generate future cash 
flows for working capital purposes. The inability to gauge the length of such disruption further adds to this 
uncertainty. For these reasons, the generation of sufficient operating cash flows remain a risk. Management 
is closely monitoring commercial and technical aspects of the Group’s operations to mitigate risk and believes 
the Group will have access to sufficient working capital to continue operations for the foreseeable future.

These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt over the 
Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and that it may be unable to realise its 
assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include 
any adjustments that would result if the Group and Company were unable to continue as a going concern. 

Basis of preparation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with applicable International 
Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (“IFRS”) and with those parts of the UK 
Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting under IFRS as adopted by the European Union. The 
financial statements are presented in GB Pounds Sterling. They are prepared on the historical cost basis or 
the fair value basis where the fair valuing of relevant assets and liabilities has been applied.

Merger relief under s612 of the Companies Act 2006 removes the requirement to credit the share premium 
account and where the conditions are met, the relief must be applied. However, it allows the investment to 
be accounted for at the nominal value of the shares issued or the fair value of the consideration. Where the 
investment is to be recorded at fair value, then the credit will be to the merger relief reserve.

60

The conditions to qualify for merger relief are:

• the consideration for shares in another company includes issued shares; 

• on completion of the transaction, the company issuing the shares will have secured at least a 90% equity 
holding in the other company.

Merger relief was required to be applied in acquisition of Fennoscandian Resources, in which the Company 
obtained 100% of the share capital of Fennoscandian for shares issued by the Company. Further details of 
this acquisition are outlined in note 9. 

New standards, amendments and interpretations

As of 1 January 2019, the Company adopted IFRS 16 Leases, Amendments to IFRS 2 – classification and 
measurement of share-based payments transactions, Annual improvements to IFRS Standards 2015-2017 
cycle and IFRIC 23 Uncertainty over income tax treatments. 

IFRS 16 Adoption 

On 1 January 2019, the Group adopted the provisions of IFRS 16 – Leases using the modified retrospective 
approach, under which the cumulative effect of initial application is recognised in retained earnings at 1 
January 2019 where material. 

Accordingly, the comparative information presented for 2018 has not been restated. IFRS 16 has been 
applied to one new lease which was adopted during the financial year. In the Statement of Financial Position 
the right-of-use asset is recorded in non-current assets as part of property, plant and equipment and 
the lease liability is split between current liabilities for the portion due within 12 months and non-current 
liabilities for the remainder. To determine the split between principal and interest in the lease the incremental 
borrowing rate of the Group was applied. This method was adopted as the Group was not able to ascertain 
the implied interest rate in the lease. The Group has applied the exemption not to recognise right-of-use 
assets and liabilities for leases with less than 12 months of lease term when applying IFRS 16 to leases 
previously classified as operating leases under IAS 17. Of the other IFRSs and IFRICs, none are expected to 
have a material effect on future Company Financial Information.

There are several standards, amendments to standards, and interpretations which have been issued by the 
IASB that are effective in future accounting periods that the group has decided not to adopt early. The most 
significant of these are as follows, which are all effective for the period beginning 1 January 2020: 

•  IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting 

Estimates and Errors (Amendment – Definition of Material) 

•  IFRS 3 Business Combinations (Amendment – Definition of Business) 

•  Revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting 

•  Interest Rate Benchmark Reform (IBOR) reform Phase 1 (Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39 and IFRS 7)

The Directors have assessed there to be no material impact of these new accounting standards on the Group 
financial statements.

Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions

The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and 
assumptions that affect the amounts reported for income and expenses during the year and the amounts 
reported for assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. However, the nature of estimation means that 
the actual outcomes could differ from those estimates.

60

61

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

The principal source of risk and judgement is that the Exploitation Concession (the “Concession”) for Kallak 
North will not be awarded. Management maintains that its application for the Concession has satisfied the 
requirements of the Swedish Minerals Act and Environmental Code.  In October 2015, the Mining Inspectorate 
recommended to the Swedish Government that the Concession be awarded.

In late 2019, the Company engaged Mannheimer Swartling to work with its existing lawyers Fröberg & 
Lundholm to prepare a concluding statement (the “Statement”).  The Statement was sent to the Government 
on 8 November 2019.  The Statement did not include any new facts in the Kallak case, as all necessary 
and relevant facts have already been established as part of the application process. Rather, the Statement 
summarises the circumstances relevant to a judicial review of whether the Company should be awarded the 
Concession for Kallak.  The Statement concludes that the Company should be awarded the Concession.

It is management’s judgement that it is appropriate to remain optimistic about the Government, the decision 
maker in the application process, awarding a Concession, and therefore Kallak has not been impaired.  

Management’s judgement is based on several factors: if the Government were to say ‘no’ they would have 
said ‘no’ before now; the Minister for Business, Industry and Innovation, Mr. Ibrahim Baylan is under pressure 
to take decisions from politicians in his own and other political parties; Sweden’s reputation as a mining 
investment destination is being significantly damaged.  

In addition, announcements made in October 2018 by LKAB the state iron ore company about its dwindling 
reserves at Kiruna, created a lot of interest about the importance of mining to Sweden, how it creates jobs 
and supports the economy, and the importance of iron ore. The industry association SveMin continues to 
lobby the Government to act, when it comes to the delays being experienced by mining companies applying 
for permits.

The Åtvidaberg licence is located in the Bergslagen area, southern Sweden. It was renewed during 2019 and 
now expires on 30 May 2022.  Bergslagen is one of Europe’s oldest mining districts and yielded a substantial 
portion of Sweden’s mineral wealth in the 1800-1900s, with several large mines and hundreds of smaller 
mines producing copper, zinc, lead, gold, silver, and iron ore.  Current operating mines in the area include 
Boliden’s Garpenberg and Lundin Mining’s Zinkgruvan.  Most of southern Bergslagen has seen little modern 
exploration, yet it hosts Bersbo, one of Sweden’s largest early copper mines, and Zinkgruvan, Sweden’s most 
important zinc mine.  During the year, no fieldwork was undertaken, as the Company’s exploration focus 
moved to Finland and Kosovo.  However, the Company is now considering partners to continue with the next 
stage of work on the licence and this work is ongoing.

The board has considered the impairment indicators as outlined in the Company’s accounting policies and 
having done so is of the opinion that the present situations for the Company’s main assets, Kallak, Aitolampi, 
Mitrovica and Åtvidaberg, do not qualify as impairment indicators and therefore no impairment provisions are 
required for these assets (see note 7).

The other key areas of judgement and sources of estimation uncertainty that have a significant risk of 
causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year is 
the judgment exercised in assessing the control of the Vardar Group and in respect of the Parent Company 
the recoverability of the loans made to subsidiary undertakings.

The Company was assessed to have control on the 1 April 2019 as the Company was able to exercise 
power over Vardar through the appointment of Kurt Budge as Investor Director. The investment agreement 
conveyed substantive rights to the Investor Director and through the combination of the increased 
shareholding and these rights the Company was able to affect the overall returns of the investee. 

The Parent Company, in applying the ECL model under IFRS 9, must make assumptions when implementing 
the forward-looking ECL model. This model is required to be used to assess the intercompany loans 
receivable from subsidiaries for impairment. 

62

Estimations were made regarding the credit risk of the counterparty and the underlying probability of default 
in each of the credit loss scenarios. The scenarios identified by management included Production, Divestment, 
Fire-sale and Failure. These scenarios considered technical data, necessary licences to be awarded, the 
Company’s ability to raise finance, and ability to sell the project. A reasonable change in the probability 
weightings of 3% would result in further impairment of £552,193. 

Basis of consolidation

(i) Subsidiaries and acquisitions

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and entities 
controlled by the Company (and its subsidiaries) made up to 31 December each year.  Control is recognised 
where an investor is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its investment with the investee, and has 
the ability to affect these returns through its power over the investee.

The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the statement of 
comprehensive income from the effective date of acquisition, or up to the effective date of disposal, as 
appropriate.

Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries are presented separately from the equity attributable to equity 
owners of the parent Company. When changes in ownership in a subsidiary do not result in a loss of 
control, the non-controlling shareholders’ interests are initially measured at the non-controlling interests’ 
proportionate share of the subsidiaries net assets. Subsequent to this, the carrying amount of non-controlling 
interests is the amount of those interests at initial recognition plus the non-controlling interests’ share of 
subsequent changes in equity. Total comprehensive income is attributed to non-controlling interests even if 
this results in the non-controlling interests having a deficit balance.

(ii) Equity accounted investees

Associates

Associates are entities over which the Group has significant influence but not control, generally 
accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. Significant influence is the 
power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but not the ability to 
control or jointly control those policies. Investments in Associates are accounted for using the equity method 
of accounting. 

Equity method of accounting – Associates 

Under the equity method of accounting, interests in Associates are initially recognised at cost. The Group’s 
share of Associates post acquisition profit / loss after tax and other comprehensive income/ loss are 
presented as the ‘Share of results of Equity accounted investees’ in the Group income statement and Group 
Statement of other comprehensive income respectively. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are 
adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment less any impairment in value. Where indicators of 
impairment arise, the carrying amount of the Associate is tested for impairment by comparing its recoverable 
amount against its carrying value. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with Associates are eliminated 
to the extent of the Group’s interest in the entity. Unrealised losses are similarly eliminated to the extent that 
they do not provide evidence of impairment of a transferred asset. When the Group’s share of losses in an 
Associate equal or exceeds its interest in the Associate, the Group does not recognise further losses unless 
the Group has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the Associate. When the Group ceases 
to have or significant influence, any retained interest in the entity is re-measured to its fair value at the date 

62

63

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

when or significant influence is lost with the change in carrying amount recognised in the income statement. 
The Group also reclassifies any movements previously recognised in other comprehensive income to the 
income statement.

(iii) Transactions eliminated on consolidation

Intra-Group balances and any unrealised gains and losses or income and expenses arising from intra-Group 
transactions are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

Business combinations 

On acquisition, the assets, liabilities, and contingent liabilities of a subsidiary are measured at their fair value 
at the date of acquisition. Any excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair values of the identifiable 
net assets acquired is recognised as goodwill. If the aggregate of the acquisition-date fair value of the 
consideration transferred and the amount recognised for the non-controlling interest (and where the business 
combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition-date fair value of the acquirer’s previously held equity 
interest in the acquiree) is lower than the fair value of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities and the 
fair value of any pre-existing interest held in the business acquired, the difference is recognised in profit and 
loss.

Intangible assets – deferred exploration costs

All costs incurred prior to the application for the legal right to undertake exploration and evaluation activities 
on a project are expensed as incurred. Each asset is evaluated annually at 31 December, to determine 
whether there are any indications that impairment exists.

Exploration and evaluation costs arising following the application for the legal right, are capitalised on 
a project-by-project basis, pending determination of the technical feasibility and commercial viability of 
the project.  Costs incurred include appropriate employee costs and costs pertaining to technical and 
administrative overheads.

Exploration and evaluation activity include:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

researching and analysing historical exploration data;

gathering exploration data through topographical, geochemical and geophysical studies;

exploratory drilling, trenching and sampling;

determining and examining the volume and grade of the resource;

surveying transportation and infrastructure requirements; and

conducting market and finance studies.

Administration costs that are not directly attributable to a specific exploration area are expensed as incurred. 

Deferred exploration costs are carried at historical cost less any impairment losses recognised. When a 
project is deemed to no longer have commercially viable prospects to the Group, deferred exploration costs in 
respect of that project are deemed to be impaired and written off to the statement of comprehensive income. 
Once the decision for investment is taken, the assets will be assessed for impairment and to the extent that 
these are not impaired, will be classified as development assets. At the point that production commences 
these assets will be depreciated.  

64

 
 
 
 
 
 
Impairment

Whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be 
recoverable an asset is reviewed for impairment. An asset’s carrying value is written down to its estimated 
recoverable amount (being the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and value in use) if that is less than 
the asset’s carrying amount.

Impairment reviews for deferred exploration and evaluation expenditure are carried out on a project by 
project basis, with each project representing a potential single cash generating unit. An impairment review is 
undertaken when indicators of impairment arise such as: 

(i) unexpected geological occurrences that render the resource uneconomic;

(ii) title to the asset is compromised;

(iii) variations in mineral prices that render the project uneconomic;

(iv)  substantive expenditure on further exploration and evaluation of mineral resources is neither 

budgeted nor planned; and

(v)  the period for which the Group has the right to explore has expired and is not expected to be 

renewed.

Property, plant and equipment

Items of property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation.

Depreciation is provided at the following annual rates in order to write off each asset over its estimated 
useful life. 

Office equipment  

Motor Vehicles  

-  25 per cent on reducing balance 

-  20 per cent on reducing balance 

Machinery and equipment  

-  20 to 25 per cent on reducing balance 

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet 
date.

Leased assets

When entering into a contract the Group assesses whether or not a lease exists. A lease exists if a contract 
conveys a right to control the use of an identified asset under a period of time in exchange for consideration. 
Leases of low value items and short-term leases (leases of less than 12 months at the commencement date) 
are charged to the profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term in administrative expenses.

The Group recognises right-of-use assets at cost and lease liabilities at the lease commencement date based 
on the present value of future lease payments. The right-of-use assets are amortised on a straight-line basis 
over the length of the lease term. The lease liabilities are recognised at amortised cost using the effective 
interest rate method. Discount rates used reflect the incremental borrowing rate specific to the lease.

Investments in subsidiaries

Investments in subsidiary undertakings are stated at cost less provision for any impairment in value.

64

65

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, and other short term highly 
liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Financial assets

The Group classifies all of its financial assets at amortised cost.  Management determines the classification of 
its financial assets at initial recognition.

Amortised cost

The Group’s financial assets held at amortised cost comprise trade and other receivables and cash and cash 
equivalents in the consolidated statement of financial position.

These assets are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in 
an active market.  They arise principally through the provision of goods and services to customers (e.g. trade 
receivables), but also incorporate other types of financial assets where the objective is to hold their assets in 
order to collect contractual cash flows and the contractual cash flows are solely payments of the principal 
and interest. They are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable 
to their acquisition or issue and are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest rate 
method, less provision for impairment.

Impairment provisions for trade receivables are recognised based on the simplified approach within IFRS 
9 using the lifetime ECLs. During this process the probability of the non-payment of the trade receivables 
is assessed. This probability is then multiplied by the amount of the expected loss arising from default to 
determine the lifetime ECL for the trade receivables. For trade receivables, which are reported net; such 
provisions are recorded in a separate provision account with the loss being recognised within administrative 
expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. On confirmation that the trade receivable 
will not be collectable, the gross carrying value of the asset is written off against the associated provision.

Expected credit loss provisions for other receivables are recognised based a forward-looking expected credit 
loss model. The methodology used to determine the amount of the provision is based on whether there 
has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition of the financial asset. For those where 
the credit risk has not increased significantly since initial recognition of the financial asset, twelve month 
expected credit losses along with gross interest income are recognised. For those for which credit risk has 
increased significantly, lifetime expected credit losses along with the gross interest income are recognised. 
For those that are determined to be credit impaired, lifetime expected credit losses along with interest income 
on a net basis are recognised.

Financial liabilities

The Group’s financial liabilities include trade and other payables. All financial liabilities are recognised initially 
at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred, and are subsequently stated at amortised cost, using the 
effective interest method.

Unless otherwise indicated, the carrying values of the Group’s financial liabilities measured at amortised cost 
represents a reasonable approximation of their fair values.

66

 
Fair value

All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements 
are categorised within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy prioritises the inputs to valuation 
techniques used to measure fair value. The Group uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing 
the fair value of financial instruments and other assets and liabilities for which the fair value was used:

- level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

-  level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included in level 1 that are observable for the asset or 

liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices); and

-  level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable 

inputs).

Equity instruments

Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.  
Where equity instruments are issued as part of an acquisition they are recorded at their fair value on the date 
of acquisition.

Taxation

Current tax, including UK corporation tax and foreign tax, is provided at amounts expected to be paid (or 
recovered) using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance 
sheet date.

Deferred tax is recognised, using the liability method, in respect of temporary differences between the 
carrying amount of the Group’s assets and liabilities and their tax base.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off 
current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and 
the same taxation authority. Any remaining deferred tax asset is recognised only when, on the basis of all 
available evidence, it can be regarded as probable that there will be suitable taxable profits, within the same 
jurisdiction, in the foreseeable future against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilised.

Deferred tax is determined using tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods in which the asset is 
realised or liability settled, based on tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by 
the balance sheet date.

Current and deferred tax is recognised in the profit or loss, except when the tax relates to items charged or 
credited directly in equity, in which case the tax is also recognised directly in equity.

Foreign currencies

The individual financial statements of each Group entity are presented in the currency of the primary 
economic environment in which the entity operates (its functional currency).  For the purpose of the 
consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position of each entity are expressed in GB 
Pounds Sterling which is the presentation currency for the Group and Company financial statements.  The 
functional currency of the Company is the GB Pounds Sterling.

In preparing the financial statements of the individual entities, transactions in currencies other than the 
entity’s functional currency (foreign currencies) are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates 
of the transactions.  At each balance sheet date, monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are 
retranslated at the rates prevailing at the balance sheet date.

66

67

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items and on the retranslation of monetary items 
are included in the statement of comprehensive income for the period.

For the purpose of presenting consolidated financial statements, the assets and liabilities of the Group’s 
foreign operations are expressed in GB Pounds Sterling using exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet 
date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period.  Exchange 
differences arising, if any, are classified as other comprehensive income and are transferred to the Group’s 
translation reserve.

Foreign currency movements arising from the Group’s net investment, which comprises equity and long-
term debt, in subsidiary companies whose functional currency is not the GB Pounds Sterling are recognised 
in the translation reserve, included within equity until such time as the relevant subsidiary company is sold, 
whereupon the net cumulative foreign exchange difference relating to the disposal is transferred to profit and 
loss.

Share-based payment transactions

Where equity settled share options are awarded to employees, the fair value of the options at the date of 
grant is charged to the income statement over the vesting period.  Non-market vesting conditions are taken 
into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected to vest at each balance sheet date so 
that, ultimately, the cumulative amount recognised over the vesting period is based on the number of options 
that eventually vest.  Market vesting conditions are factored into the fair value of all options granted.  As 
long as all other vesting conditions are satisfied, a charge is made irrespective of whether market vesting 
conditions are satisfied.  The cumulative expense is not adjusted for failure to achieve a market vesting 
condition.

Where terms and conditions of options are modified before they vest, the increase in the fair value of the 
options, measured immediately before and after the modification, is also charged to the income statement 
over the remaining vesting period.

Where equity instruments are granted to persons other than employees, the income statement or share 
premium account, if appropriate, are charged with the fair value of goods and services received.

Government grant

Government grants received on capital expenditure are generally deducted in arriving at the carrying amount 
of the asset purchased. Grants for revenue expenditure are recorded gross in the Group income statement. 
Where retention of a government grant is dependent on the Group satisfying certain criteria, it is initially 
recognised as deferred income. When the criteria for retention have been satisfied, the deferred income 
balance is released to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income or netted against the asset 
purchased.

68

2. 

EMPLOYEES AND DIRECTORS

Group 

 Company

2019 

£ 

2018 

£ 

2019 

£ 

2018

£

Wages and salaries 

464,889 

352,816 

225,270 

189,435

Bonus 

Social security costs 

Other benefits 

2,193 

70,152 

19,180 

3,903 

29,111 

18,843 

- 

24,547 

13,809 

-

20,149

13,720

556,414 

404,673 

263,626 

223,304

Directors’ remuneration is as follows:

Directors emoluments, including salary and fees  

Shares settled expenses 

Social security costs 

Share-based payments 

  2019 

£ 

2018

£

 255,155 

203,155

 10,417 

 24,547 

-

20,149

 76,403 

109,144

 366,522 

332,448

Further details pertaining to Directors remuneration can be found in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on 
page 37.

The remuneration of the highest paid Director who served during the year was £151,000 (2018: £130,667)

The average monthly number of employees and Directors during the year was as follows:

2019 

Group 

2018 

Group 

2019 

2018

Company 

Company

Number 

Number 

Number  

Number

Directors 

Employees  

3 

5 

3 

3 

3 

- 

3

-

68

69

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

3. 

FINANCE INCOME AND COSTS

Finance income: 

Deposit account interest 

Finance costs: 

Interest on lease liabilities 

4. 

LOSS BEFORE TAX AND AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION

a. The loss before tax is stated after charging:

Depreciation (note 8) 

Amortisation of right-of-use assets (note 11) 

Foreign exchange differences 

Impairment of exploration costs (note 7)   

b. Auditor’s remuneration

Fees payable to the Group’s auditor for the audit  
of the consolidated financial statements  

Fees payable to the Group auditor for other services: 

- audit of subsidiaries pursuant to legislation 

- review of quarterly financial statements 

- tax compliance services 

2019 

£ 

6,298 

6,298 

410 

410 

2019 

£ 

20,971 

4,615 

2,015 

10,720 

2019 

£ 

2018

£

11,603

11,603

-

-

2018

£

14,696

-

2,088

571,456

2018

£

36,025 

28,970

6,000 

2,135 

5,300 

49,460 

5,000

2,076

5,300

41,346

70

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5. 

INCOME TAX

Analysis of tax expense

No liability to UK corporation tax arose on ordinary activities for the year ended 31 December 2019 or for the 
year ended 31 December 2018. 

Factors affecting the tax expense

The tax assessed for the year is higher than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK. The difference is 
explained below: 

2019 

2018

£ 

£

Loss on ordinary activities before income tax 

(428,707)  (1,374,584)

Tax thereon at a UK corporation tax rate 

of 19%  (2018 – 19%) 

Effects of: 

Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 

Non-assessable fair value gain  

Tax losses not recognised   

Share of loss of associates  

(81,454) 

(261,171)

25,400 

145,903

(107,052) 

-

108,710 

80,841

- 

3,777

Losses of overseas subsidiaries to be carried forward    

54,396 

30,650

- 

-

The main rate of UK corporation tax during the year ended 31 December 2019 was 19.00 per cent (2018: 
19 per cent). The Group has estimated UK losses of £11,584,097 (2018: £10,632,410) and foreign losses 
of £2,913,896 (2018: £1,522,939) available to carry forward against future trading profits. The value of 
unrecognised deferred tax assets in respect of the UK losses amounts to £2,200,978 (2018: £2,020,157). The 
Directors believe that due to the uncertainty over when the tax losses will be utilised it is appropriate not to 
recognise a deferred tax asset at this time.

70

71

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

6. 

BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE

The calculation of basic and diluted loss per share at 31 December 2019 was based on the loss attributable 
to ordinary shareholders of £249,192 (2018: £1,373,936) and a weighted average number of Ordinary 
Shares outstanding during the year ended 31 December 2019 of 585,102,740 (2018: 554,716,045) calculated 
as follows: 

Loss attributable to ordinary shareholders   

(249,192) 

(1,373,936)

2019 

£ 

2018

£

Weighted average number of ordinary shares

2019 

2018

   Number 

      Number

Number of shares in issue at the beginning of the year 

554,716,045 

  534,207,254

Effect of shares issued during year 

30,386,695 

  20,508,791

Weighted average number of ordinary shares  
in issue for the year  

585,102,740 

  554,716,045

The diluted earnings per share is identical to the basic loss per share as the exercise of warrants and options 
would be anti-dilutive.

72

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7. 

INTANGIBLE ASSETS - Group

COST 

At 1 January 2018 

Additions for the year 

Foreign exchange movements 

Impairment 

At 31 December 2018 

At 1 January 2019 

Additions for the year 

Additions arising from the step-up in interest in Vardar 

Foreign exchange movements 

Impairment 

At 31 December 2019  

NET BOOK VALUE 

At 31 December 2019 

At 31 December 2018 

  Exploration

Costs

£

  8,191,232

782,437

(116,666)

(571,456)

  8,285,547

  8,285,547

  1,304,896

  1,203,685

(771,914)

(10,720)

  10,011,494

  10,011,494

  8,285,547

The net book value of exploration costs is comprised of expenditure on the following projects:

Kallak 

Åtvidaberg 

Ågåsjiegge 

Sala 

Pitkäjärvi 

Joutsijärvi 

Karhunmaki   

Rääpysjärvi   

Mervivaara 

Polvela   

Tammijärvi 

Mitrovica 

Viti 

2019 

£ 

2018

£

6,675,124  7,079,806

345,978 

303,565

15,568 

- 

17,121

8,444

1,058,078 

817,986

19,095 

24,078 

39,905 

17,846 

31,316 

24,278 

1,243,194 

517,034 

25,002

13,685

19,938

-

-

-

-

-

10,011,494  8,285,547

72

73

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Total Group exploration costs of £10,011,494 are currently carried at cost in the financial statements.  
The Group will need to raise funds and/or bring in joint venture partners to further advance exploration and 
development work. An amount of £91,231 was recorded against the projects for services provided by the 
Directors during the year (2018: £139,594). 

Accounting estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on a number of factors, 
including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. 

In accordance with its accounting policies and processes, each asset is evaluated annually at 31 December, 
to determine whether there are any indications impairment exist, the Board considers the indications as 
outlined in IFRS 6.

On 30 November 2017, the County Administrative Board (“CAB”) for the County of Norrbotten made the 
decision to not recommend that an Exploitation Concession for Kallak North be awarded. It should be noted 
that the CAB does not have the final decision, that rests with the Government.  The CAB’s decision included 
information not based on fact, flawed analysis, and biased conclusions that contradicted its previous 
representations provided in July 2015. The key biases include:

•  Operating outside their mandate with respect to assessing transport matters at this stage of 

permitting and suggesting the need for State investment should Kallak be built.  The Company has 
never stated that State support would be needed.  The CAB ignored infrastructure projects that are 
already under consideration e.g. Inlandsbanan Railway, the Ore Railway and the Port of Luleå, all 
of which will bring additional capacity to regional infrastructure, which could be utilised by Kallak.

•   Disregarding Kallak’s designation as an Area of National Interest (“ANI”) awarded by the SGU in 

February 2013.

•  Disregarding the strong economic case for Kallak that the CAB presented in July 2015, that a mine 

would have local, regional and national benefits.  

The Directors considered that the CAB’s November 2017 statement was not an impairment indicator, 
as the comments and findings of the CAB represent a recommendation to Government that should have 
limited to no persuasive impact due to the inaccuracies, flawed analysis and biased conclusions the CAB 
has presented.  At the date of approval of the financial statements the Government’s consideration of the 
application was ongoing.

The most significant risk is that an Exploitation Concession is declined for Kallak North.  The Directors have 
considered the impairment indicators as outlined in the Company’s accounting policies and having done 
so are of the opinion that the current situation does not qualify as an impairment indicator and hence no 
impairment provision is required for the Kallak permitting situation. In addition, no other impairment indicators 
per IFRS 6 have been identified.

Kallak is included in the financial statements as at 31 December 2019 as an intangible exploration licence 
with a carrying value of £6,675,124. Management are required to consider whether there are events 
or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying value of this asset may not be recoverable. 
Management have considered the status of the application for the Exploitation Concession and in their 
judgement, they believe it is appropriate to be optimistic about the chances of being awarded the Exploitation 
Concession and thus have not impaired the project.

During 2019, the Fennoscandian team produced an upgraded MRE for the Aitolampi project in Finland, with 
a global Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource of 26.7 Mt at 4.8 per cent TGC for 1,275,000 tonnes of 
contained graphite, reported in accordance with the JORC Code, 2012 edition.

74

 
 
 
Fennoscandian is pursuing a strategy of developing a ‘resource footprint’ of natural flake graphite prospects 
that can provide transparent ‘security of supply’ and enable Finland to achieve its ambition of self-sufficiency 
in battery manufacturing. The Company is also developing its knowledge in processing and manufacturing 
value-added graphite products, including anode material for lithium-ion batteries, in part supported 
financially by Business Finland.

The Åtvidaberg licence is located in the Bergslagen area, southern Sweden. It was renewed during 2019 and 
now expires on 30 May 2022.  Bergslagen is one of Europe’s oldest mining districts and yielded a substantial 
portion of Sweden’s mineral wealth in the 1800-1900s, with several large mines and hundreds of smaller 
mines producing copper, zinc, lead, gold, silver, and iron ore.  Current operating mines in the area include 
Boliden’s Garpenberg and Lundin Mining’s Zinkgruvan.  Most of southern Bergslagen has seen little modern 
exploration, yet it hosts Bersbo, one of Sweden’s largest early copper mines, and Zinkgruvan, Sweden’s most 
important zinc mine.  

During the year, no fieldwork was undertaken, as the Company’s exploration focus moved to Finland and 
Kosovo.  However, the Company is now considering partners to continue with the next stage of work on the 
licence and this work is ongoing.

At Mitrovica, in northern Kosovo, located immediately to the west and northwest of the world class Stan Terg 
lead-zinc-silver mine, potential not only exists for the discovery of additional lead-zinc-silver deposits, but 
also for the discovery of high-level epithermal gold deposits and for copper-zinc deposits.  Vardar believes the 
targets are all related to a potentially much larger porphyry style mineralised system, based on meticulous 
geological mapping of hydrothermal alteration and interpretation of trench, drilling and soil geochemical 
exploration data. To date, the work completed in Kosovo has yielded exciting results which warrant further 
investment.

In the year, an impairment provision of £10,720 (2018: £571,456) was made against costs incurred on Sala 
(2018: £8,444) on the basis that no further exploration would be carried out on those projects. In respect 
of the other license areas, no impairment indicators have been identified. The impairment is charged as an 
expense and included within the consolidated income statement. 

74

75

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual ReportNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

8. 

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

GROUP 

COST  

Office  
Equipment 

Motor  
Vehicles 

Machinery 
& equipment 

Total

£ 

£ 

£ 

£

At 1 January 2018 
Additions 
Foreign exchange movements 
At 31 December 2018 

DEPRECIATION  

At 1 January 2018 
Charge for year  
Foreign exchange movements 
At 31 December 2018 

GROUP 

COST  
At 1 January 2019 
Additions 
Foreign exchange movements 
Step acquisition of subsidiary 
At 31 December 2019 

DEPRECIATION  

At 1 January 2019 
Charge for year  
Foreign exchange movements 
At 31 December 2019 

NET BOOK VALUE 

 6,383 
- 
- 
 6,383 

6,383  
 - 
 - 
6,383  

Office  
Equipment 
£ 

 6,383 
 941  
- 
- 
 7,324  

6,383  
 - 
 - 
6,383 

47,711 
- 
(287) 
47,424 

26,236 
9,026 
(221) 
35,041  

Motor  
Vehicles 
£ 

47,424 
33,873  
(3,590)  
13,300  
91,007  

35,041  
8,014 
(2,964) 
40,091 

 26,500 
2,515 
(380) 
28,635 

19,395 
5,670 
 (130) 
24,935  

Machinery 
& equipment
£ 

28,635 
42,801  
(2,431) 
1,689  
70,694  

24,935  
12,957  
 (2,339) 
35,553  

80,594
2,515
(667)
82,442

52,014
14,696
(351)
66,359 

Total

£

 82,442
 77,615 
(6,021)
 14,989 
 169,025 

66,359 
20,971
 (5,303)
82,027 

At 31 December 2019 
At 31 December 2018 

 941  
 - 

50,916  
12,383 

35,141  
3,700 

86,998 
16,083

76

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PARENT 

COST  
At 1 January 2018 
Additions 
At 31 December 2018 

DEPRECIATION  
At 1 January 2018 
Charge for year  
At 31 December 2018 

PARENT 

COST  
At 1 January 2019 
Additions 
At 31 December 2019 

DEPRECIATION  
At 1 January 2019 
Charge for year  
At 31 December 2019 

NET BOOK VALUE 
At 31 December 2019 
At 31 December 2018 

Office 
Equipment
£

6,383
-
6,383

6,383
-
6,383

Office 
Equipment
£

6,383
-
6,383

6,383
-
6,383

-
-

76

77

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

9. 

INVESTMENTS 

Group 
Shares in  
associates 

Shares in  
subsidiaries 

Company
Shares in  
associates 

Total

£ 

£ 

£ 

£

COST  

At 1 January 2018 
Acquisitions 
Shares of loss of associates 
At 31 December 2018 

- 
250,000 
(19,880) 
230,120 

At 1 January 2019 
Change in control of associate  
Acquisitions 
At 31 December 2019 

230,120 
(230,120) 
- 
- 

479,311 
3,677 
- 
482,988 

482,988 
250,000 
965,000 
1,697,988 

- 
250,000 
- 
250,000 

250,000 
(250,000) 
- 
- 

479,311
253,677
-
732,988

732,988
-
965,000
1,697,988

Investments in associates are initially recorded at cost plus any equity share of post-acquisition profit or loss 
after-tax. An investment in an associate is largely determined as an associate based on voting interests and 
presence on the investee’s board of directors. 

Further investments in the share capital of subsidiaries of Vardar constitute additions during the year of 
£965,000 to increase the Company’s shareholding in Vardar from 14.1% to 41.5%. The share capital of 
Vardar was reclassified to share capital of subsidiaries following control being obtained on 1 April 2019. 
The basis for control was assessed on the on the Group’s ability to exercise power over Vardar through 
combination of the increased investment in Vardar and the appointment of the CEO as Investor Director, 
which conveyed substantive rights to direct the actions of Vardar that would ultimately affect the returns of 
the investee.

The remaining investment represents 100 per cent of the share capital of Fennoscandian, that was acquired 
during the year ended 31 December 2016 and holds a portfolio of four early-stage graphite exploration 
projects. At the time of acquisition, Beowulf paid for 100 per cent of the share capital of Fennoscandian by 
issuing 2.55 million ordinary shares in the Company, with two further tranches of 2.1 million ordinary shares 
to be issued on achievement of certain performance milestones.

The first tranche of 2.1 million ordinary shares was issued on the anniversary of 24 months from the date 
of the acquisition, in accordance and Mr Blomqvist having worked for the Company as a full-time employee 
during that period. The second tranche of shares will be issued on completion of a bankable feasibility study 
on one of the graphite projects in the portfolio. 

The total number of ordinary shares that may be issued, if all performance milestones are achieved, is 6.75 
million ordinary shares. Beowulf will issue up to a further 2.1 million additional consideration shares in the 
form of a share-based payment transaction to the former owner, Rasmus Blomqvist. The share-based 
payments fall within the scope of IFRS 2 and are fair valued at the grant date based on the estimated 
number of shares that will vest. The fair value has been prepared using a Black-Scholes pricing model 
including a share price of 6.4 pence, option life of two years, volatility of 49.79 per cent and a risk-free rate of 
0.698 per cent. 

78

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
There was no consideration recognised in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2019, 
(2018: £484,441). No further share based payment charge for the consideration shares was capitalised to 
intangibles in the year ended 31 December 2019. (2018: £3,677).

Step up interest in Vardar Minerals
On 1 April 2019, following an increase in the Company’s shareholding from 14.00% to 31.3% in Vardar the 
Company obtained control and consolidated Vardar and its companies into the Group. Vardar was previously 
accounted for as an associate on an equity accounting basis. The Group has fair valued the holding at the 
date of the change of control resulting in a cumulative fair value gain of £563,431. Further increases in the 
Company’s holding in Vardar have been recognised as an increase to accumulated losses of £202,228. 

The investment in Vardar gives the Company exposure to a portfolio of exploration licences situated in the 
European Tertiary calc-alkaline Tethys Arc most notable for its lead-zinc-silver mining districts, as well as 
recent porphyry related copper and gold discoveries. Further investments were made during the year ended 
31 December 2019. 

-    On 15 April 2019, a further investment of £250,000 was made to increase the Company’s shareholding in 

Vardar from 31.3% to 37.6%.

-  On 14 October 2019, a further investment of £115,000 was made to increase the Company’s shareholding 

in Vardar from 37.6% to 40.1%.

-   On 6 November 2019, a further investment of £100,000 was made to increase the Company’s shareholding 

in Vardar from 40.1% to 41.5%.

The note below shows the effect of the step transaction at the date of change of control of 1 April 2019. 

Cash and cash equivalents  
Property plant & equipment  
Other receivables 
Intangibles - Exploration costs 
Net Identifiable assets acquired  

Consideration – Cash  
Fair value gain on investment 
Non-controlling interests 
Carry value of investment at change of control  

Carrying 
value 
£ 

530,031 
14,989 
14,669 
124,607 
684,296 

Fair value 
adjustments 
£ 

- 
- 
- 
1,078,846 
1,078,846 

Total 

£

530,031
14,989
14,669
1,203,453
1,763,142

500,000
565,157
470,111
227,874
1,763,142

The fair value adjustment recognised at the date of change of control was representative of the fair value of 
the Mitrovica and Viti assets obtained. Management consider that it is these assets which will drive the future 
economic returns from the Group’s investment in Vardar. The unrecorded potential value of the resources at 
Mitrovica and Viti represents the gain on the acquisition of the control of the Vardar Group. 

If the entity had been a fully consolidated from 1 January 2019 it would have contributed an overall loss of 
£262,483 to the consolidated loss of the Group. 

The entity incurred no acquisition costs relating to the step up of its interest in Vardar. 

78

79

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Name 

Incorporated 

Activity 

% holding  % holding 

2019 

2018

Oy Fennoscandian Resources AB  Finland 

Mineral exploration 

Jokkmokk Iron Mines AB 

Sweden 

Mineral exploration 

Beowulf Mining Sweden AB 

Sweden 

Mineral exploration 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100%

100%

100%

Wayland Copper Limited 

UK 

Holding company 

65.25% 

65.25%

Wayland Sweden AB 

Sweden 

Mineral exploration 

(1)(2)65.25% 

(1)(2)65.25%

Vardar Minerals Ltd 

UK 

Mineral Exploration 

41.5% 

Vardar Geoscience BVI Ltd 

British Virgin Islands  Holding company    

(1)(2)41.5% 

14%

14%

Vardar Geoscience Kosovo Ltd 

Kosovo 

Mineral exploration 

(1)(2)39.4%           (1(2)13%

Vardar Minerals Europe 1 EOOD 

Bulgaria 

Mineral exploration 

(1)(2)41.5%          (1)(2)14%

Vardar Minerals Europe 2 EOOD 

Bulgaria 

Mineral exploration 

(1)(2)41.5%          (1)(2)14%

Vardar Minerals Europe 3 EOOD 

Bulgaria 

Mineral exploration 

(1)(2)41.5%          (1)(2)14%

(1) Indirectly held

(2) Effective interest

The Group consists of the following subsidiary undertakings:

Name 

Registered office 

Oy Fennoscandian Resources AB  Plåtslagarevägen 35 A 1, 20320 Turku, Finland

Jokkmokk Iron Mines AB 

Storgatan 36, 921 31, Lycksele, Sweden

Beowulf Mining Sweden AB 

Storgatan 36, 921 31, Lycksele, Sweden

Wayland Copper Limited 

201 Temple Chambers, 3-7 Temple Avenue, London

Wayland Sweden AB 

Storgatan 36, 921 31, Lycksele, Sweden

Vardar Minerals Limited  

35-39 Maddox Street, London, England

Vardar Geoscience BVI Ltd 

Trident Chambers, P.O. Box 146, Wickhams Cay 1 Road Town,  
British Virgin Islands

Vardar Geoscience Kosovo L.L.C 

Rifat Berisha 23/10, Pristina, Republic of Kosovo 

Vardar Minerals Europe 1 EOOD 

Sofia 1606, Krasno selo district, 30-32 Gen.E.I.Totleben Blvd, Fl 2

Vardar Minerals Europe 2 EOOD 

Sofia 1606, Krasno selo district, 30-32 Gen.E.I.Totleben Blvd, Fl 2

Vardar Minerals Europe 3 EOOD 

Sofia 1606, Krasno selo district, 30-32 Gen.E.I.Totleben Blvd, Fl 2

Details on the non-controlling interest in subsidiaries is given in note 14.

80

 
 
 
 
10. 

LOANS AND OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS 

GROUP

At 1 January 2018 
Foreign exchange movements 
Disposals 
At 31 December 2018 

At 1 January 2019 
Foreign exchange movements 
Disposals 
At 31 December 2019 

COMPANY

At 1 January 2018 
Advances made in the year 
ECLs in year 
At 31 December 2018 

Loans to group 
undertakings 
£ 

7,429,198 
952,091 
(161,856) 
8,219,433 

Financial  
assets 
£ 

2,784 
- 
- 
2,784 

Financial 
fixed
assets
£

5,530
(55)
(13)
5,462

5,462
(243)
(7)
5,212

Total 
£

7,431,982 
952,091
(161,856)
8,222,217

At 1 January 2019 

8,219,433 

2,784 

8,222,217

Advances made in the year 
ECLs in year 
At 31 December 2019 

925,239 
(158,005) 
8,986,667 

- 
- 
2,784 

925,239
(158,005)
8,989,451

Further details of the transactions in the year are shown within related parties disclosure note 23.

80

81

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

11. 

RIGHT OF USE ASSETS

Cost 
At 1 January 2019 
Additions 
At 31 December 2019 

Amortisation  
At 1 January 2019  
Charge 
At 31 December 2019 

Net book value 
At 31 December 2019  

 Buildings

-
7,324
7,324

-
4,615
4,615

2,709

12. 

TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Other receivables 
VAT 
Prepayments and accrued income 

  Group 

2019 
£ 

94,653 
60,819 
11,789 
167,261 

2018 
£ 

29,437 
20,210 
13,309 
62,956 

 Company

2019 
£ 

2018
£

- 
11,471 
11,789 
23,260 

-
11,092
13,309
24,401

Included in other receivables is a deposit of £16,927 held by Finnish regulatory authorities (2018: £18,027).

13. 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  Group 

2019 
£ 

2018 
£ 

  Company

2019 
£ 

2018
£

Bank accounts 

1,124,062 
1,124,062 

1,533,232 
1,533,232 

978,514  1,470,087
978,514  1,470,087

82

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14. 

NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS

The Group has material non-controlling interests arising from its subsidiaries Wayland Copper Limited and 
Vardar Minerals Limited. These non-controlling interests can be summarised as follows;

Wayland Copper Limited 
Vardar Minerals Limited 
Total    

2019 
£ 
(161,291) 
487,846 
326,555 

2018
£
(160,587)
-
(160,587)

Wayland Copper Limited, a 65.25 per cent owned subsidiary of the Company that has material non-
controlling interests (“NCI”). 

Summarised financial information reflecting 100 per cent of the Wayland’s relevant figures is set out below:

Administrative expenses 
Loss after tax 

Loss allocated to NCI 
Other comprehensive income allocated to NCI 
Total comprehensive loss allocated to NCI 

Current assets 
Current liabilities 
Net liabilities 

NCI at 34.75 per cent 

2019 
£ 

2018
£

(1,537) 
(1,537) 

(1,863)
(1,863)

(534) 
(169) 
(703) 

(648)
68
(580)

5,385 
(469,531) 
(464,146) 

6,599
(468,718)
(462,119)

(161,291) 

(160,587)

Vardar Minerals Limited, a 41.5% per cent owned subsidiary of the Company that has material  
non-controlling interests (“NCI”). 

82

83

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Summarised financial information reflecting 100 per cent of the Vardar Minerals relevant figures is set out 
below:

Administrative expenses 

Loss after tax 

Loss allocated to NCI 
Other comprehensive income allocated to NC I 
Total comprehensive loss allocated to NCI 

Current assets 
Non-Current assets 
Current liabilities 
Net Assets 

NCI at 58.5% per cent 

15. 

SHARE CAPITAL

2019
£

(256,867)

(184,492)

(161,173)
(23,319)
(184,492)

118,289
746,097
(30,462)
833,924

487,846

2019 
Number 

2019 
£ 

2018 
Number 

2018
£

 Allotted, called up and fully paid 

 At 1 January 
 Issued for cash  
 Issued for acquisition of subsidiary 
 At 31 December 

566,307,254 
35,937,418 
- 
602,244,672 

5,663,072 
359,374 
- 
6,022,446 

534,207,254 
30,000,000 
2,100,000 
566,307,254 

5,342,072
300,000
21,000
5,663,072

The par value of all Ordinary Shares in issue is £0.01.

The Company has removed the limit on the number of shares that it is authorised to issue in accordance with 
the Companies Act 2006. 

84

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares issued in 2019

On 1 April 2019, the Company announced a subscription for 13,636,364 new ordinary shares of £0.01 each 
to raise £750,000 before expenses. 

On 16 April 2019, the Company announced a subscription for 8,695,652 new ordinary shares of £0.01 each 
to raise £500,000 before expenses.

The Company announced, on 24 October 2019, a subscription for 9,090,909 new ordinary shares of £0.01 
each to raise £500,000.

The Company announced, on 8 November 2019, a subscription for 4,347,826 new ordinary shares of £0.01 
each to raise £250,000.

Shares issued in 2018

On 22 February 2018, the Company announced that it has issued 2,100,000 ordinary shares of £0.01 to 
Rasmus Blomqvist, the Company’s Exploration Manager, as the first tranche of deferred considerations 
pursuant to the acquisition of Oy Fennoscandian Resources AB. 

On 16 May 2018, the Company announced to issue 30,000,000 new ordinary shares to raise approximately 
£1.5 million at a price of £0.05 per new ordinary share.

16. 

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS 

During the year ended 31 December 2019, 9,250,000 options were granted (2018: Nil). The options 
outstanding as at 31 December 2019 have an exercise price in the range of 1.66 pence to 12.00 pence (2018: 
1.66 pence to 12.00 pence) and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2 years, 98 days (2018: 2 
years).

The share-based payments expense for the options for the year ended 31 December 2019 was £119,720 
(2018: £196,460). 

The fair value of share options granted and outstanding were measured using the Black-Scholes model, with 
the following inputs:

Fair value at grant date 
Share price 
Exercise price 
Expected volatility 
Option life 
Risk free interest rate 

2019 
1.15p 
5.65p 
7.35p 
51.89% 
5 years 
0.718% 

2017 
8.73p 
14.28p 
12.00p 
70.00% 
5 years 
0.25% 

2015
0.708p
1.25p
1.66p
170.90%
5 years
1.58%

The options issued will be settled in the equity of the Company when exercised and have a vesting period of 
one year from date of grant. 

84

85

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Reconciliation of options  
in issue 

Number 

2019 

Weighted 
average 
exercise price  
(£’s) 
2019 

Number 

2018 

Weighted  
average  
exercise price 
(£’s)
2018

Outstanding at 1 January 

14,000,000 

Lapsed during the year  

(500,000) 

Granted during the year  

9,250,000 

Outstanding at 31 December  22,750,000 

Exercisable at 31 December 

22,750,000 

0.051 

0.040 

0.074 

0.074 

0.060 

14,000,000 

0.051

- 

- 

14,000,000 

11,750,000 

-

-

0.051

0.037

No warrants were granted during the year (2018: Nil).

17. 

 RESERVES

The following is a description of each of the reserve accounts that comprise equity shareholders’ funds:

Share capital 

Share premium 

  The share capital comprises the issued ordinary shares of the Company 
at par.

 The share premium comprises the excess value recognised from the issue 
of ordinary shares above par value.

Capital contribution reserve 

 The capital contribution reserve represents historic non-cash 
contributions to the Company from equity holders.

Share-based payment reserve 

 Cumulative fair value of options charged to the consolidated income 
statement net of transfers to the profit or loss reserve on exercised and 
cancelled/lapsed options.

Translation reserve 

 Cumulative gains and losses on translating the net assets of overseas 
operations to the presentation currency.

Merger reserve  

 The balance on the merger reserve represents the fair value of the 
consideration given in excess of the nominal value of the ordinary 
shares issued in an acquisition made by the issue of shares where the 
transaction qualifies for merger relief under the Companies Act 2006.

Accumulated losses 

 Accumulated losses comprise the Group’s cumulative accounting profits 
and losses since inception.

86

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18. 

TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Current: 

Trade payables 

Social security and other taxes 

Other payables 

Accruals  

19. 

DEFERRED INCOME

Group 

  Company

2019 

£ 

2018 

£ 

151,332 

122,892 

11,623 

10,619 

69,311 

242,885 

8,968 

9,761 

66,392 

208,013 

2019 

£ 

19,593 

8,648 

100 

62,063 

90,404 

2018

£

11,997

6,457

1,758

46,746

66,958

2019 

£ 

2018

£

Grants  

134,877 

192,205

The grant held as deferred income represents the first tranche receipt of €215,619 (£192,205) received on the 
30 July 2018 in accordance with the Company’s participation of Project Pacific, a component of the European 
Union’s Horizon 2020 program. The funds held are to be utilised in further exploration work, training of staff 
and travel costs. The grant period will end on the 31 May 2021 at which point any excess of funding over 
expenses submitted will required to be refunded. In the year ended 31 December 2019, The Group released 
£20,379 (2018: Nil) of the liability directly against intangible asset additions and recognised £37,080 as 
income (2018: Nil). 

Also, in the year ended 31 December 2019, Fennoscandian has received funds from Business Finland of 
£109,687 (2018: £10,233). The funds were paid in accordance with the Groups participation in Project Green 
minerals, which specified a Grant up to a total of €161,000 and had a grant period from 1 January 2018 to 31 
December 2019.The amounts incurred are sought for reimbursement following the expenses being incurred, 
as a result no liability has been recorded in the financial statements for unallocated funds. The amounts 
outlined above have been netted against intangible asset additions.

In addition, Fennoscandian is also participating in project titled “BATCircle - the development of a Finland-
based Circular Ecosystem of Battery Metals”.  BATCircle is part of the European Union (“EU”) Strategic Energy 
Technology Programme. The project is being administered by Business Finland and a 50 per cent contribution 
to a budget of Euros 224,900. The funds will be used for graphite purification and spheroidization test work, 
and the further assessment of Fennoscandian’s graphite for battery applications. The funding is released by 
the administrator as incurred and the action runs from the 1 January 2019 to 31 January 2020. In the year to 
31 December 2019, £13,916 has been netted against intangible asset additions.

86

87

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

20. 

LEASE LIABILITY

NATURE OF LEASING ACTIVITIES

Vardar Geoscience leases buildings located in Str. Highway Prishtina Mitrovice Village Shupkove No.2, 
Kosovo. 

Number of active leases 

LEASE LIABILITY AT YEAR END 

NON-CURRENT 

Lease liability 

CURRENT 

Lease liability 

TOTAL LEASE LIABILITY  

ANALYSIS OF LEASE LIABILITY

At 1 January 2019 

Additions 

Interest expense 

Lease payments 

Foreign exchange movements 

At 31 December 2019 

ANALYSIS OF GROSS VALUE OF LEASE LIABILITIES 

Maturity of the lease liabilities is analysed as follows:

Within 1 year 

Later than 1 year and less than 5 years 

After 5 years 

At 31 December 2019 

The total cash outflow for leases in 2019 was £4,875.

88

31 Dec

2019

No.

1

31 Dec

2019

£

1,914

1,914

5,558

5,558

7,472

Lease liability

£

-

12,144

410

(4,875)

(207)

7,472

31 Dec 2019

£

-

7,472

-

7,472

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21. 

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Group and Company’s financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents, loans and investments, 
trade receivables and trade payables that arise directly from its operations.

The Group and Company hold the following financial instruments:

At 31 December 2019 

FINANCIAL ASSETS 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Loans to group undertakings 
Other financial assets 

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES 
Trade and other payables 
Lease liability  

At 31 December 2018 

FINANCIAL ASSETS 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Loans to group undertakings 
Other financial assets 

Held at  
amortised 
cost 
£ 

1,124,062 
94,653 
- 
5,212 
1,223,927 

Group 

Total 

£ 

1,124,062 
94,653 
- 
5,212 
1,223,927 

Held at 
amortised  
cost 
£ 

978,514 
- 
8,986,667 
2,784 
9,967,965 

Company

Total 

£

978,514
-
8,986,667
2,784
9,967,965

231,262 
7,472 
238,734 

231,262 
7,472 
238,734 

81,756 
- 
81,756 

81,756
-
81,756

Held at  
amortised 
cost 
£ 

1,533,232 
29,437 
- 
5,462 
1,568,131 

Group 

Total 

£ 

1,533,232 
29,437 
- 
5,462 
1,568,131 

Held at 
amortised  
cost 
£ 

1,470,087 
- 
9,902,932 
2,784 
11,375,803 

Company

Total 

£

1,470,087
-
9,902,932
2,784
11,375,803

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES 
Trade and other payables 

199,046 

199,046 

60,499 

60,499

The main purpose of these financial instruments is to finance the Group’s and Company’s operations. The 
Board regularly reviews and agrees policies for managing the level of risk arising from the Group’s financial 
instruments as summarised below.

a) Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as commodity prices, foreign exchange rates, 
interest rates and equity prices will affect the Group’s and Company’s income or the value of its holdings in 
financial instruments.

88

89

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

i) 

Foreign exchange risk

The Group operates internationally and is exposed to currency risk arising on cash and cash equivalents, 
receivables and payables denominated in a currency other than the respective functional currencies of 
the Group entities, which are primarily Swedish Krona, Euro and Sterling. The Group’s and Company’s net 
exposure to foreign currency risk at the reporting date is as follows:

Group 

  Company

2019 
£ 

2018 
£ 

2019 
£ 

2018 
£

14,007 
24,036 
38,043 

10,355 
107,160 
117,515 

4,861 
(104,723) 
(98,862) 

9,450
126,838
136,288

Net foreign currency financial 
(liabilities)/assets: 

Swedish Krona 
Euro 
Total net exposure 

Sensitivity analysis

A 10 per cent strengthening of sterling against the Group’s primary currencies at 31 December 2019 would 
have increased/(decreased) equity and profit or loss by the amounts shown below:

GROUP

Swedish Krona 
Euro 
Total 

COMPANY

Swedish Krona 
Euro 
Total 

  Profit or Loss 

Equity

2019 
£ 
(1,401) 
(22,404) 
(23,805) 

2018 
£ 
(1,035) 
(10,716) 
(11,751) 

2019 
£ 
(1,401) 
(22,404) 
(23,805) 

2018 
£
(1,035)
(10,716)
(11,751)

  Profit or Loss 

Equity

2019 
£ 
(486) 
10,472 
9,986 

2018 
£ 
(945) 
(11,966) 
(12,911) 

2019 
£ 
(486) 
10,472 
9,986 

2018 
£
(945)
(11,966)
(12,911)

A 10 per cent weakening of sterling against the Group’s primary currencies at 31 December 2019 would have 
an equal but opposite effect on the amounts shown above. 

Interest rate risk

ii) 
The Group’s and Company’s policy is to retain its surplus funds on the most advantageous term of deposit 
available up to a 12-month maximum duration. Given that the Directors do not consider that interest income 
is significant in respect of the Group’s and Company’s operations no sensitivity analysis has been provided in 
respect of any potential fluctuations in interest rates.

90

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
b) 

Credit risk

The Group’s principal financial assets are the cash and cash equivalents and loans and receivables, as 
recognised in the statement of financial position, and which represent the Group’s maximum exposure to 
credit risk in relation to financial assets. The Group and Company policy for managing its exposure to credit 
risk with cash and cash equivalents is to only deposit surplus cash with financial institutions that hold a 
Standard & Poor’s, BBB- rating as a minimum.

The Company has made unsecured interest-free loans to its subsidiaries. Although they are repayable on 
demand, they are unlikely to be repaid until the projects becomes successful and the subsidiaries start to 
generate revenues. An assessment of the expected credit loss arising on intercompany loans is detailed in 
note 10.

The amounts used by the subsidiaries are as follows:

Jokkmokk Iron Mines AB 

Beowulf Sweden AB  

Wayland Copper Ltd 

Oy Fennoscandian Resources AB 

Gross   

2019 

£ 

2018

£

7,241,375 

8,349,344

361,773 

361,657

- 

1,383,519 

8,986,667 

-

1,191,931

9,902,932

Reconciliation of provisions against receivables arising from lifetime ECLs

ECLs 

Total provision arising from ECLs  

31  
December  

2018 

£ 

1,683,499 

1,683,499 

Current 
year 

movement  

£ 

31 
December

2019

£

158,005 

158,005 

1,841,504

1,841,504

The Directors have also assessed the cash flow scenarios of the above considerations. Estimations were 
made regarding the credit risk of the counterparty and the underlying probability of default in each of the 
credit loss scenarios. The scenarios identified by management included Production, Divestment, Fire-sale 
and Failure. These scenarios considered technical data, necessary licences to be awarded, the Company’s 
ability to raise finance, and ability to sell the project. The ECL to the 31 December 2019 represents the 12 
month expected credit loss, as underlying credit risk of the intercompany loans has not changed since initial 
recognition. A reasonable change in the probability weightings of 3% would result in further impairment of 
£552,193. 

90

91

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

i) 

Commodity price risk

The principal activity of the Group is the exploration for iron ore in Sweden, graphite in Finland and other 
prospective minerals in Kosovo, and the principal market risk facing the Group is an adverse movement in 
the price of such commodities/industrial minerals. Any long-term adverse movement in market prices would 
affect the commercial viability of the Group’s various projects.

Liquidity risk

c) 
To date the Group and Company have relied on shareholder funding to finance operations.  As the Group and 
Company have finite cash resources and no material income, the liquidity risk is significant and is managed 
by controls over expenditure and cash resources. In addition, the Group and Company do not have any 
material borrowings and primarily have trade and other payables with a maturity of less than one year, the 
only exception being the lease liability per note 20. The rationale for the preparation of the accounts on a 
going concern basis is detailed in the Report of the Directors.

Capital management

d) 
The Groups capital structure consists of issued capital and reserves, accumulated losses and non-controlling 
interest. The Board’s policy is to preserve a strong capital base in order to maintain investor, creditor 
and market confidence and to safeguard the future development of the business, whilst balancing these 
objectives with the efficient use of capital.

2019 
£ 

1,124,062 
(242,885) 
(134,877) 
746,300 

2018
£

1,533,232
(208,014)
(192,205)
1,133,013

11,219,345 

9,733,182

6.65% 

11.64%

NET DEBT
GROUP 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade payables  
Grant income  
Net cash 

Total equity 

Net cash to equity ratio 

92

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22.   SEGMENT REPORTING

The Group’s only reportable segment is the exploration for, and the development of iron ore, graphite and 
other mineral deposits. The Group also reports by geographical reportable segment in the countries in which 
it operates. The Group’s exploration and development activities are focused on three countries, Sweden, 
Finland and Kosovo, with support provided from the UK headquarters. In presenting information on the basis 
of geographical reportable segments, the loss for the year, key statement of financial position data, property, 
plant and equipment additions and deferred exploration additions is based on the geographical location of 
the assets. The Group has adopted IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’. IFRS 8 requires operating segments to be 
identified on the basis of internal reports that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to 
allocate resources and assets. 

2019 

Sweden 
£ 

Finland 
£ 

Kosovo 
£ 

UK 
£ 

Total
£

Licence and Exploration  
Other non-current assets 
Current assets 
Liabilities 
Finance Income 
Finance Costs 
Impairment  
Expenses 
Loss for the year 
Total comprehensive loss 

2018 

Licence and Exploration  
Other non-current assets 
Current assets 
Liabilities 
Expenses 
Impairment  
Loss for the year 
Total comprehensive loss 

7,036,672 
2,711 
46,339 
(28,453) 
- 
- 
- 
(110,224) 
(109,538) 
(795,503) 

1,214,595 
9,700 
124,145 
(86,702) 
- 
- 
10,720 
(55,221) 
(20,252) 
(89,186) 

1,578,300 
75,689 
48,346 
(29,979) 
- 
- 
- 
(167,513) 
395,918 
405,782 

181,897 
11,434 
1,072,493 
(240,100) 
6,298 
(410) 
- 
(702,148) 
(694,835) 
(744,099) 

10,011,494
99,534
1,291,323
(385,234)
6,298
(410)
10,720
(1,035,106)
(428,707)
(1,223,006)

7,408,275 
4,986 
51,536 
(50,530) 
(124,908) 
- 
(124,908) 
(258,997) 

877,272 
13,775 
49,334 
(76,188) 
(607,862) 
571,456 
(607,862) 
(597,040) 

- 
- 
- 
- 
(19,880) 
- 
(19,880) 
(19,880) 

-  
2,784 
1,495,318 
(273,500) 
(633,537) 
- 
(621,934) 
(621,934) 

8,285,547
21,545
1,596,188
(400,218)
(1,386,187)
571,456
(1,374,584)
(1,497,851)

92

93

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

23.  RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES

Transactions with subsidiaries

During the year, cash advances of £286,045 (2018: £259,192) were made to Jokkmokk Iron Mines AB and 
incurred costs of £131,948 that were paid on behalf by the Company (2018: £96,167). The advances are held 
on an interest free inter-group loan which has no terms for repayment. At the year end the inter-Group loan 
amounted to £7,241,374 (2018: £8,352,577).

Beowulf Sweden AB received cash advances of £72,290 (2018: £88,221) and incurred costs of £5,057 (2018: 
£29,901) that were paid on behalf by the Company. The advances are held on an interest free inter-Group 
loan which has no terms for repayment. At the year end the inter-Group loan amounted to £361,772 (2018: 
£361,657). 

OY Fennoscandian AB received cash advances of £479,458 (2018: £457,103) and incurred costs of £31,296 
(2018: £41,275) that were paid on behalf by the Company. The advances are held on an interest free inter-
Group loan which has no terms for repayment. At the year end the inter-Group loan amounted to £1,383,518 
(2018: £1,199,107).

In accordance with its service agreement, Fennoscandian charges Beowulf Mining plc for time incurred by 
its staff on exploration projects held by other entities in the Group. In turn Beowulf Mining plc recharges the 
other entities involved. 

In addition, Beowulf Mining plc charges entities in the Group for time and expenses spent by Directors 
on providing services. An arm’s length margin has been included at entity level, but this is subsequently 
eliminated on consolidation. 

The Company has made unsecured interest-free loans to its subsidiaries. Although they are repayable on 
demand, they are unlikely to be repaid until the projects becomes successful and the subsidiaries start to 
generate revenues. An assessment of the expected credit loss arising on intercompany loans is detailed in 
note 21.

Transactions with other related parties

Key management personnel include all Directors and those who have authority and responsibility for 
planning, directing and controlling the activities of the entity, the aggregate compensation paid to key 
management personnel of the Company is set out below,

2019 
£ 

2018
£

489,727 
30,364 
105,359 
10,417 
809 
636,676 

298,288
29,710
200,137
-
720
528,855

Short-term employee benefits (including employers’  
national insurance contributions) 
Post-retirement benefits 
Share based payments 
Share settled expense 
Insurance  

94

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mr Blomqvist incurred a charge of £22,976 with respect of remaining unvested options (2018: £87,316). Mr 
Blomqvist is considered key management personnel in his role as Group’s Exploration Manager. 

On 31 October 2019, 166,667 fully paid new ordinary shares of £0.01 were issued to Kurt Budge, at a 
deemed price of 6.25p per share. The Share Issue is to compensate Kurt Budge for the lapse of 500,000 share 
options granted to Kurt Budge, exercisable at a price of 4p per share, as announced via RNS on 10 October 
2014 .Kurt Budge was unable to exercise the Share Options due to being in a closed period in respect of the 
recent fundraising announced via RNS on the 24 October 2019.

In January 2020, an outbreak of a coronavirus, now classified as COVID 19, was detected in China’s Hubei 
province. During the following months, COVID 19 has spread steadily throughout the World and on 11 March 
2020, The World Health Organisation (“WHO”) declared the outbreak a global pandemic. In order to stem the 
spread of the virus, Governments around the World are taking drastic steps which include compulsory closure 
of various businesses, shops and schools and are also heavily restricting of movement of people with lock 
down. There has been no impact of COVID-19 on the underlying operations at 31 December 2019, however 
due to the rapid development of COVID 19, the degree of uncertainty involved and the unprecedented nature 
of the challenges posed by the coronavirus situation, the Directors’ are of the opinion that it is too soon to 
quantify what financial impact that the COVID 19 pandemic will be, but are monitoring the situation closely.

On 17 February 2020, Beowulf invested £50,000 in Vardar Minerals limited, increasing the Company’s 
investment in Vardar from 41.5% to 42.2%. 

On 25 March 2020, a made a further investment of £30,000, alongside a further £40,0000 investment by 
founder shareholders. The additional investment maintains the Company’s holding in Vardar Minerals limited 
at 42.2%. Funds will be used to continue exploration works in Kosovo, as permitted to do so under COVID-19 
restrictions.  All works will be carried out in accordance with Kosovan Government advice and Vardar’s 
health, safety and emergency protocols.

On 14 July, an extension was granted on 9,000,000 share options held by Kurt Budge. The extension allowed 
the options that would have otherwise expired on the 17 July 2020, are now able to be exercised up to the 17 
July 2021. 

94

95

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report 
 
 
Company Information

Directors 

Mr K R Budge 
Mr Christopher Davies   
Mr G Färm Davies

Secretary 

Mr L O’Donoghue

Registered Number & Office

Incorporated in England  
and Wales 
02330496 (England & Wales)  
Beowulf Mining plc 
201 Temple Chambers 
3-7 Temple Avenue 
London EC4Y 0DT

Finnish Office

Swedish Registered Address

Registrars

Oy Fennoscandian Resources AB 
Akademigatan 1,  
20500 Åbo 
Finland 

All subsidiary companies 
Storgatan 36,  
921 31 LYCKSELE 
Sweden

Neville Registrars Ltd 
Neville House,18 Laurel Lane 
Halesowen 
West Midlands 
B63 3DA

Auditors

BDO LLP 
55 Baker Street  
London 
W1U 7EU

Nominated Adviser & Broker

Swedish Custodian Bank

SP Angel 
Prince Frederick House 
35-39 Maddox Street 
London 
W1S 2PP

Skandinaviska Enskilda 
Banken AB 
ST M7 
106 40 Stockholm 
Sweden 

UK Bank

Public Relations UK                              

Website 

The Royal Bank of Scotland 
Piccadilly Circus Branch 
48 Haymarket 
London 
SW1Y 4SE

Blytheweigh Communications 
Limited 
4-5 Castle Court 
London 
EC3V 9DL

www.beowulfmining.com

Solicitors

BHW Solicitors 
1 Smith Way 
Grove Park  
Enderby 
Leicestershire 
LE19 1SX

96

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
96

2019 Beowulf Mining plc Annual Report

97

www.beowulfmining.com