UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________________________________________
FORM 40-F
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
or
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014
Commission File Number 0-29898
__________________________________________________________
BlackBerry Limited
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Ontario
(Province or other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
3,661
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
Not Applicable
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No)
2200 University Ave East
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada,
N2K 0A7
(519) 888-7465
(Address and telephone number of Registrant’s principal executive offices)
BlackBerry Corporation
5000 Riverside Drive, Suite 100E,
Irving, Texas, USA 75039
(972) 650-6126
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service in the United States)
__________________________________________________________
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Shares, without par value
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information filed with this Form:
Annual information form
Audited annual financial statements
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Registrant’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the
period covered by this annual report.
The Registrant had 526,551,953 Common Shares outstanding as at March 1, 2014.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
No
A.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) as
those controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in
reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.
The Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Registrant’s disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report and have determined that such disclosure
controls and procedures were effective. A discussion of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures can be found in its
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended March 1,
2014, included in Exhibit No. 1.3 to this Annual Report, under the heading “Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal
Controls - Disclosure Controls and Procedures”.
B.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended
March 1, 2014, included in Exhibit No. 1.3 to this Annual Report, under the heading “Disclosure Controls and Procedures and
Internal Controls - Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”.
C.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The attestation report of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) is included in EY’s report, dated March 28, 2014, to the
shareholders of the Registrant, which accompanies the Registrant’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year
ended March 1, 2014, filed as Exhibit 1.2 to this Annual Report.
D.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended
March 1, 2014, included in Exhibit No. 1.3 to this Annual Report, under the heading “Disclosure Controls and Procedures and
Internal Controls – Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”.
E.
Notice of Pension Fund Blackout Period
The Registrant was not required by Rule 104 of Regulation BTR to send any notice to any of its directors or executive
officers during the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014.
F.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Registrant’s Board of Directors has determined that Barbara Stymiest, an individual serving on the Audit and Risk
Management Committee of the Registrant’s Board of Directors, is an audit committee financial expert, within the meaning of
General Instruction B(8)(a) of Form 40-F.
The Commission has indicated that the designation of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not make
such person an “expert” for any purpose, impose any duties, obligations or liability on such person that are greater than those
imposed on members of the Audit and Risk Management Committee and the Board of Directors who do not carry this
designation or affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit and Risk Management Committee or
Board of Directors.
G.
Code of Ethics
The Registrant’s Board of Directors has adopted a code of ethics (the “Code”) that applies to all directors, officers and
employees. A copy of the Code may be obtained at www.blackberry.com. The Registrant will provide a copy of the Code
without charge to any person that requests a copy by contacting the Corporate Secretary at the address that appears on the cover
of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
H.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed by EY, the Company’s independent auditor, for the fiscal years ended March 1, 2014 and
March 2, 2013, respectively, for professional services rendered by EY for the audit of the Company’s annual financial
statements or services that are normally provided by EY in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for
such fiscal years were $5,128,000 and $4,195,000, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
The aggregate fees billed by EY for the fiscal years ended March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, respectively, for assurance
and related services rendered by EY that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit review of the Company’s
financial statements and are not reported above as audit fees were $167,000 and $107,000, respectively. Professional services
provided included procedures related to the audit of new systems implemented.
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed by EY for the fiscal years ended March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, respectively, for
professional services rendered by EY for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning and other services were $11,000 and
$13,000, respectively. Tax services provided included international tax compliance engagements.
All Other Fees
There were no fees billed by EY for the fiscal years ended March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, except as described above.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Since the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30, 2002, all audit and non-audit services performed by
the Registrant’s outside auditors are pre-approved by the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Registrant.
I.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Registrant is not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current
or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity,
capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
J.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
Tabular disclosure of the Registrant’s contractual obligations can be found in its Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, included in Exhibit No. 1.3
to this Annual Report, under the heading “Financial Condition - Aggregate Contractual Obligations”.
K.
Identification of Audit Committee
The Registrant has an Audit and Risk Management Committee comprised of three individuals: Barbara Stymiest
(Chair), Claudia Kotchka and Timothy Dattels. Each of the members of the Audit and Risk Management Committee is
independent as that term is defined by the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”).
L.
Critical Accounting Estimates
A discussion of the Registrant’s critical accounting estimates can be found in its Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, included in Exhibit No. 1.3
to this Annual Report, under the heading “Critical Accounting Estimates”.
M.
Nasdaq Exemptions
On November 5, 2002, the Registrant requested an exemption from Nasdaq’s quorum requirements (which provide
that a quorum for a shareholder meeting of a Nasdaq-listed company must be at least 33-1/3% of the outstanding common
shares of the company) on the basis that such requirements were contrary to generally accepted business practices in Canada.
The Registrant’s by-laws provide that the quorum requirements for the transaction of business at any meeting of shareholders
shall be two persons present in person, each being a shareholder entitled to vote thereat or a duly appointed proxyholder or
representative for a shareholder so entitled, holding or representing not less than 20% of the issued shares of the Registrant, of
the class or classes respectively (if there is more than one class of shares outstanding at the time), enjoying voting rights at such
meeting. The Registrant’s quorum requirements comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) and
are consistent with the quorum requirements of other Canadian public companies. On November 25, 2002, based on the
Registrant’s representations, Nasdaq granted the requested exemption.
On November 7, 2013, the Registrant utilized an exemption from Nasdaq’s shareholder approval requirements of
Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635 (which provide that shareholder approval is required in connection with certain private placements
and employment inducement grants) on the basis that the Registrant elected to follow Canadian practice in connection with (i)
the issuance of $1,250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of convertible debentures, convertible into Common Shares of the
Registrant, to certain investors, including Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, pursuant to the terms of a subscription
agreement, dated November 4, 2013, as amended, and (ii) the grant of 13,000,000 restricted share units to John Chen (of this
aggregate grant, 10,521,418 restricted share units were granted as an employee inducement under section 613(c) of the Toronto
Stock Exchange Company Manual with the balance of the grant (2,478,582 restricted share units) made under the Registrant’s
Equity Incentive Plan, which had previously been approved by shareholders), in lieu of such requirements. The Registrant’s
not seeking shareholder approval in connection with the private placement or employment inducement grant described above
comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) and the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange.
N.
Interactive Data File
The Registrant has submitted to the Commission, included in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report, an Interactive Data
File.
O.
Mine Safety
The Registrant is not currently required to disclose the information required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
UNDERTAKING AND CONSENT TO SERVICE OF PROCESS
A.
Undertaking
The Registrant undertakes to make available, in person or by telephone, representatives to respond to inquiries made by the
Commission staff, and to furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the Commission staff, information relating to the securities
in relation to which the obligation to file an annual report on Form 40-F arises or transactions in said securities.
B.
Consent to Service of Process
The Registrant has previously filed with the Commission a Form F-X in connection with its Common Shares.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing
on Form 40-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
SIGNATURE
Date: March 28, 2014
BLACKBERRY LIMITED
By:
/s/ James Yersh
Name:
James Yersh
Title:
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
No.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Document
1.1
Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, dated March 28, 2014.
1.2
1.3
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year
ended March 1, 2014.
23.1
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
31.1
32.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
101
Interactive Data File.
Table of Contents
Exhibit 1.1
BLACKBERRY LIMITED
2200 University Avenue East
Waterloo, Ontario
Canada
N2K 0A7
Annual Information Form
For the fiscal year ended
March 1, 2014
DATE: March 28, 2014
1
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTAIN INTERPRETATION MATTERS
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
THE COMPANY
INTER-CORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
SUCCESS FACTORS
STRATEGY
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
THIRD PARTY SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS
INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS
SALES, MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
CUSTOMERS
COMPETITION
PRODUCT DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
PRODUCTION
REGULATORY MATTERS
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
EMPLOYEES
FACILITIES
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
RISK FACTORS
DIVIDEND POLICY AND RECORD
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
COMMON SHARES
CLASS A COMMON SHARES
PREFERRED SHARES
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
MARKET FOR SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
CEASE TRADE ORDERS, BANKRUPTCIES, PENALTIES OR SANCTIONS
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
GLOSSARY
APPENDIX A
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
2
3
3
5
5
5
6
9
9
10
12
14
16
17
18
18
19
20
22
23
23
24
24
24
25
27
53
53
53
53
54
54
58
58
60
61
61
62
62
62
63
63
63
67
67
Table of Contents
CERTAIN INTERPRETATION MATTERS
ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to the “Company” and “BlackBerry” include BlackBerry Limited
(formerly, Research In Motion Limited) and its subsidiaries. Certain industry and technical terms have the meanings specified
in the Glossary. All dollar references, unless otherwise noted, are in United States dollars.
BlackBerry®, BBM™, QNX® and related trademarks, names and logos are the property of BlackBerry Limited and are
registered and/or used in the United States and countries around the world. All other trademarks are the property of their
respective owners.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Information Form (“AIF”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws,
including under the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities laws, including
statements relating to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the Company’s plans, strategies and objectives, including the anticipated benefits of the strategic initiatives described
below, and the anticipated opportunities and challenges for the Company in fiscal 2015;
the Company’s expectations with respect to the sufficiency of its financial resources;
the Company’s expectations regarding new product initiatives and their timing, including BlackBerry Enterprise
Service (“BES”) 10, BES 12, BlackBerry 10 smartphones and services related to BlackBerry Messenger (“BBM”),
QNX software products and the QNX cloud-based machine to machine solution (the “QNX Cloud”);
the Company’s plans and expectations regarding its existing and new service offerings, assumptions regarding its
service revenue model, and the anticipated levels of decline in service revenue in the coming quarters;
anticipated demand for, and the Company’s plans and expectations relating to, the Company’s BlackBerry 7 and 10
smartphones, including programs to drive sell-through of these smartphones;
the Company’s ongoing efforts to streamline its operations and its expectations relating to the benefits of its Cost
Optimization and Resource Efficiency (“CORE”) program and similar strategies;
the Company's plans to continue implementation of a workforce reduction of approximately 4,500 positions; and
the Company’s plans and expectations regarding marketing and promotional programs.
The words “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “intend”, “believe”, “plan” and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions made by
the Company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future
developments, as well as other factors that the Company believes are appropriate in the circumstances, including but not
limited to, the Company’s expectations regarding its business, strategy, opportunities and prospects, including its ability to
implement meaningful changes to address its business challenges, the launch of products based on the BlackBerry 10 platform,
general economic conditions, product pricing levels and competitive intensity, supply constraints, and the Company’s
expectations regarding the cash flow generation of its business and the sufficiency of its financial resources. Many factors
could cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the following factors, most of which are discussed in greater
detail in the “Risk Factors” section of this AIF:
•
•
•
•
risks related to the Company's ability to implement and to realize the benefits of its strategic initiatives, including a
return to the Company's core strengths of enterprise and security, changes to the Company's Devices business,
including the new partnership with Foxconn Technology Group (“Foxconn”), and the planned transition to an
operating unit organizational structure consisting of the Devices business, Enterprise Services, QNX Embedded
business and Messaging;
the Company’s ability to maintain its existing relationships with its enterprise customers and the Company's ability to
transition its enterprise customers to the BES 10 platform and deploy BlackBerry 10 smartphones, and the risk that
current BES 10 test installations may not convert to commercial installations;
the Company's ability to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services in a timely
manner or at competitive prices, including risks related to new product introductions and adoption and the relevance of
hardware in light of the Company's decreasing market share of the smartphone industry;
the risk that uncertainty relating to the Company's previously disclosed announcements concerning the Company's
operational restructuring, recent management changes and the Company's workforce reductions, may adversely impact
3
Table of Contents
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the Company's business, existing and future relationships with business partners and end customers of its products and
services, and its ability to attract and retain key employees;
risks related to the Company’s ability to offset or mitigate the impact of the decline in the Company’s service access
fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering;
intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within the Company’s industry, including recent
and potential future strategic transactions by its competitors or carrier partners, which could continue to weaken the
Company’s competitive position or could continue to require the Company to reduce its prices to compete effectively;
the Company's ability to adapt to, and realize the anticipated benefit of, its recent board of directors (the “Board”) and
management changes;
the Company’s increasing reliance on third-party manufacturers for certain products and its ability to manage its
production and repair process, and risks related to the Company changing manufacturers or reducing the number of
manufacturers or suppliers it uses;
risks related to the Company's ability to implement and to realize the benefits of its previously-disclosed operational
restructuring initiatives, including the CORE program, and its ability to continue to realize cost reductions in the
future, including the Company's ongoing efforts to continue to implement a workforce reduction of approximately
4,500 positions by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015;
the risk that workforce reductions may result in a disruption to business critical processes and the effectiveness of the
Company's internal controls;
the Company’s ability to maintain its existing relationships with its network carrier partners and distributors, and its
reliance on its network carrier partners to help promote the BlackBerry 10 platform and BlackBerry 10 smartphones;
risks related to the Company’s ability to maintain or increase its liquidity, its existing cash balance, its ability to access
existing or potential alternative sources of funding, the sufficiency of its financial resources, and its ability to service
its debt;
risks related to the Company's significant indebtedness;
the Company’s ability to address inventory and asset risk, including its ability to sell its inventory of BlackBerry 10
products, manage its purchase obligations with its manufacturing partners and the potential for additional charges
related to its inventory, as well as its ability to mitigate inventory risk through its new partnership with Foxconn;
the potential for additional charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on the Company’s balance
sheet;
the occurrence or perception of a breach of the Company’s security measures, or an inappropriate disclosure of
confidential or personal information;
the Company’s ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand in light of recent challenges;
the efficient and uninterrupted operation of the Company's network operations center and the networks of its carrier
partners, and the risk of other business interruptions, including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and
reputational damage associated with service interruptions;
risks associated with the Company's foreign operations, including risks related to recent political and economic
developments in Venezuela and Argentina, and the impact of foreign currency restrictions that continue to impact its
ability to recognize revenue from sales of services in Venezuela and recently, Argentina;
general commercial litigation, class action and other litigation claims, including purported class action claims relating
to the Company or its operations;
risks associated with litigation claims against the Company arising from the Company’s practice of providing a
forward-looking outlook to its shareholders with respect to certain financial metrics, including the Company’s practice
of updating a previous outlook where circumstances warrant;
risks related to the failure of the Company’s suppliers, subcontractors, third-party distributors and representatives to
use acceptable ethical business practices or comply with applicable laws;
third-party claims for infringement of intellectual property rights by the Company and the outcome of any litigation
with respect thereto;
the Company’s ability to successfully obtain patent or other proprietary or statutory protection for its technologies and
products;
reliance on strategic alliances and relationships with third-party network infrastructure developers, software platform
vendors and service platform vendors, including the Company’s ability to promote and advance the development of an
ecosystem of applications and services for the BlackBerry 10 platform;
4
Table of Contents
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
potential liabilities or costs related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of user and personal
information;
the Company’s reliance on its suppliers for functional components, including the suppliers the Company has selected
for its BlackBerry 10 smartphones, and the risk that suppliers will not supply components on a timely basis, in
sufficient quantities or of the desired quality;
the Company’s ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties;
the Company’s ability to expand and manage BlackBerry® World™, including its ability to encourage developers to
continue to develop applications for BlackBerry® World™;
restrictions on import and use of the Company’s products and services in certain countries due to encryption of the
products and services;
the continued quality and reliability of the Company’s products and services and the potential effect of defects in
products and services;
risks as a result of actions of activist shareholders;
risks related to the Company possibly losing its foreign private issuer status under U.S. federal securities laws,
resulting in additional expenses associated with compliance with the U.S. securities laws applicable to U.S. domestic
issuers and inability to utilize certain benefits available to foreign private issuers;
government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies;
reduced spending by customers due to the uncertainty of economic and geopolitical conditions;
risks associated with acquisitions, investments and other business initiatives;
foreign exchange risks as the Company transacts globally in currencies other than the U.S. dollar;
regulation, certification and health risks, and risks relating to the misuse of the Company’s products;
tax liabilities, resulting from changes in tax laws or otherwise, associated with the Company’s worldwide operations;
market and credit risk associated with the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and short-term or long-term investments;
the potential impact of copyright levies in numerous countries; and
costs and other burdens associated with recently adopted regulations regarding conflict minerals.
Any statements that are forward-looking statements are intended to enable the Company’s shareholders to view the anticipated
performance and prospects of the Company from management’s perspective at the time such statements are made, and they are
subject to the risks that are inherent in all forward-looking statements, as described above. These forward-looking statements
are made by the Company in light of its experience, its perception of historical and anticipated business trends, existing
conditions in the business at the time and anticipated future developments, including competition and new product initiatives
and expected timing, as well as the Company’s current assessments of the risk factors that affect its business, including those
identified above, and the likely success of mitigation strategies relating to such factors. These forward-looking statements are
subject to the inherent risk of difficulties in forecasting the Company’s financial results and performance for future periods,
particularly over longer periods, given the ongoing transition in the Company's business strategy and the rapid technological
changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless
communications industry. These difficulties in forecasting the Company's financial results and performance are magnified at
the present time given the uncertainties related to the Company's operational restructuring, recent management changes and the
strategic initiatives described in this AIF. These factors should be considered carefully, and readers should not place undue
reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements. The Company has no intention and undertakes no obligation to update
or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required
by applicable law.
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
The Company
The Company was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) (“OBCA”) on March 7, 1984 and commenced
operations at that time. The Company has amalgamated with several of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the last amalgamation
occurring through the filing of articles of amalgamation under the OBCA on November 4, 2013. The Company’s registered and
principal business office is 2200 University Avenue East, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2K 0A7, telephone: (519) 888-7465, fax:
(519) 888-6906.
5
Table of Contents
Inter-corporate Relationships
The Company has three material subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company.
Name of Subsidiary
BlackBerry Corporation
BlackBerry UK Limited
BlackBerry Singapore Pte. Limited
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
Delaware, U.S.A.
England and Wales
Singapore
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
A global leader in wireless innovation, the Company revolutionized the mobile industry with the introduction of the BlackBerry
solution in 1999. Today, the Company aims to inspire the success of its millions of customers around the world by continuously
pushing the boundaries of mobile experiences.
Product and business developments that have influenced the general development of the Company’s business over the last three
fiscal years are as follows:
Fiscal 2014:
• Announced on August 12, 2013, the formation of a Special Committee by the Board to explore strategic alternatives to
enhance value and increase scale to accelerate BlackBerry 10 deployment;
• Announced on September 23, 2013, that the Company had signed a letter of intent (the “LOI”) with Fairfax Financial
Holdings Limited (“Fairfax”), a Canadian company led by Prem Watsa, under which a consortium to be led by Fairfax
proposed to acquire the Company;
• Announced on November 4, 2013, that in lieu of the transaction contemplated by the LOI, the Company had entered into
an agreement pursuant to which Fairfax and other institutional investors would subscribe for $1 billion aggregate principal
amount of 6% unsecured subordinated convertible debentures, with an option to purchase an additional $250 million
principal amount of debentures (collectively, the “Debentures”). The announcement of this financing marked the
conclusion of the strategic review process previously announced by the Board. The initial $1 billion investment of
Debentures was completed on November 13, 2013, and the option to purchase the additional $250 million of Debentures
was completed on January 16, 2014 (collectively, the “Debenture Financing”);
• The Debenture Financing resulted in the following changes to the Board and management team:
•
•
•
appointment of John Chen as Executive Chair of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer,
appointment of Prem Watsa as Lead Director of the Board and Chair of the Compensation, Nomination and
Governance Committee, and
resignations of Thorsten Heins as Chief Executive Officer and a director, and David Kerr as a director;
• Announced the Company’s plan to transition the business to focus on four areas: the Devices business, Enterprise Services,
the QNX Embedded business and Messaging;
• Announced further management and Board changes as part of the on-going reorganization of BlackBerry including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
appointment of James Yersh as Chief Financial Officer (replacing Brian Bidulka),
appointment of Eric Johnson as President, Global Sales,
appointment of Ron Louks as President, Devices and Emerging Solutions,
appointment of James S. Mackey as Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategic Planning,
appointment of Mark Wilson as Senior Vice President, Marketing,
appointment of John Sims as President, Global Enterprise Services,
resignations of Kristian Tear as Chief Operating Officer and Frank Boulben as Chief Marketing Officer, and
resignation of Roger Martin from the Board;
• Announced a joint device development and manufacturing agreement with Foxconn, initially focusing on the development
of a consumer smartphone for Indonesia and other fast-growing markets;
• Announced in March 2014 the entry into an agreement for the divestiture of the majority of its real estate holdings in
Canada, with an expected closing in the first quarter of fiscal 2015;
• Announced in February 2014 new enterprise solutions, partnerships and smartphone models, including the next generation
of BES (BES 12) that will unify BES 10 and BES 5 onto one platform. BES 12 will enable organizations to develop
enterprise-grade applications that are quickly deployed to BlackBerry smartphones and other mobile devices and provide
customers with the ability to move securely from on-premise to the cloud effortlessly. The Company also announced a
new BES pricing and licensing structure (Silver and Gold) and a new EZ pass program that will enable customers to
move from BES and other mobile device management (“MDM”) programs to BES 10 or BES 12 at the Silver level of
service for free, the eBBM Suite (a new family of products and services, including BBM Protected, that will work with
6
Table of Contents
BlackBerry smartphones, BES and BES 10 to provide enterprise-class mobile messaging), the BlackBerry Z3 and the
BlackBerry Classic (originally announced as the BlackBerry Q20);
• Launched updates to BES 10 (versions 10.1 and 10.2) and launched software updates for BlackBerry 10 smartphones
(versions 10.1, 10.2 and 10.2.1), with hundreds of new enhancements and refinements;
• Unveiled new QNX technology in automotive and cloud services at the 2014 International Consumer Electronics Show
in January 2014;
• Grew the global BBM user base to approximately 85 million active users as of March 25, 2014;
• Launched BBM for Android and iPhone customers for free, responding to smartphone users’ desire to be able to connect
to all of their friends and family, regardless of the smartphone they carry and subsequently launched BBM Voice and
BBM Channels for Android and iPhone customers;
• Announced in February 2014 that BBM will be made available to Windows Phone and Nokia X customers in the coming
months;
• Announced in December 2013 the preinstallation of BBM on LG smartphones in markets around the world;
• Delivered four BlackBerry 10 smartphones, including models with touchscreen and physical keyboards in various sizes
including:
•
•
•
the BlackBerry Q10 and BlackBerry Q5 featuring a physical QWERTY keyboard and touchscreen,
the BlackBerry Z30 featuring a 5” display and BlackBerry 10.2 operating system (“OS”), and
the elite, all-touch Porsche Design P’9982;
• Launched the BlackBerry 9720 smartphone to support the BlackBerry 7 market;
• Announced in August 2013 that the U.S. Defense Information System Agency had given BlackBerry Z10 and Q10
smartphones with BES 10 the Authority to Operate (“ATO”) on Department of Defense (“DoD”) networks, being the
first MDM provider to obtain an ATO and in March 2014 announced that BlackBerry had become the first mobility
solution to receive Full Operational Capability (“FOC”) to run on DoD networks;
• Launched Secure Work Space for iOS and Android, providing organizations the flexibility to embrace “Bring Your Own
Device” or “BYOD” (the combination of enterprise-deployed devices and devices that are purchased by consumers, but
also used in the corporate environment);
• Launched BBM Channels for BlackBerry smartphones to extend the popular BBM experience to brands, artists, businesses
and communities, connecting consumers and groups in real-time;
• Enabled Secure Enterprise Instant Messaging on BlackBerry 10 smartphones. BlackBerry Enterprise Instant Messaging
3.0 supports secure instant messaging and collaboration with Microsoft Lync, Microsoft Office Communication Server
and IBM Lotus Sametime;
• Launched the BlackBerry Scholars Program, the first step in its global women’s initiative, designed to inspire more
women to enter and develop careers in the fields of science, technology, engineering and math, by providing full, four-
year tuition scholarships;
• Opened the doors of a fourth BlackBerry® Tech Center in Brazil, a partnership with PUC-Rio;
• Announced the change of the Company’s name from Research In Motion Limited to BlackBerry Limited;
• Announced in March 2013 the retirement of Mike Lazaridis as Vice-Chair of the Board, effective May 1, 2013; and
• Continued to implement the cost savings and process-improving initiatives started in the prior fiscal year to drive greater
efficiency throughout the Company, and redirect capital from these savings to areas of investment that are expected to
drive future revenue growth.
Fiscal 2013:
•
Introduced the re-designed, re-engineered, and re-invented BlackBerry platform that created a new and unique
mobile computing experience. Two new Long Term Evolution-enabled ("LTE") smartphones powered by the
BlackBerry 10 OS, the BlackBerry Z10 (all-touch) and BlackBerry Q10 (touch with physical keyboard), were
introduced on January 30, 2013 at events held simultaneously in New York, Toronto, London, Paris, Dubai, and
Johannesburg;
Began to operate around the world under the iconic name BlackBerry, effective January 30, 2013;
Commenced trading under its new ticker symbols “BB” on the Toronto Stock Exchange and “BBRY” on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market, on February 4, 2013;
Introduced new services and features for BlackBerry 10 smartphones, including: BlackBerry Hub, BlackBerry Flow,
BBM voice calling and video chat, Time Shift, Story Maker and BlackBerry Remember;
Improved the BlackBerry World content distribution platform and announced commitments to the BlackBerry 10
platform from many leading application providers including Skype, Amazon and Rovio;
Launched BES 10, the Company’s new enterprise mobility management solution. BES 10 brings together device
management, industry leading security and mobile applications management for pre-existing BlackBerry
smartphones, BlackBerry PlayBook tablets and new BlackBerry 10 smartphones in a consolidated solution. It also
•
•
•
•
•
7
Table of Contents
provides a single console for managing BlackBerry devices and devices running Google Android and Apple iOS
operating systems;
Launched the BlackBerry 10 Ready program to help enterprise customers prepare their environments for
BlackBerry 10;
Launched BBM Voice, a free update that allows customers to make free voice calls to other BBM customers over a
Wi-Fi connection;
Received Federal Information Processing Standard 140-2 certification for the BlackBerry 10 platform in November
2012;
Built momentum in the developer community through 44 BlackBerry Jam sessions in 37 countries, attracting more
than 9,300 attendees;
Commenced the CORE program, which drove and continues to drive significant improvements and efficiencies
across all functions in the Company’s organization;
Surpassed the CORE objective of reducing operating costs by $1 billion compared to the Q4 fiscal 2012 run rate,
one quarter ahead of initial targets;
Selected by EnStream, a joint venture of Bell Mobility Inc., Rogers Wireless Partnership and TELUS
Communications Company, to provide its Secure Element Manager (“SEM”) solution to manage credentials on
wireless handsets in Canada that support NFC Service. NFC is the technology that can make secure, convenient and
contactless mobile payments a reality for Canadian wireless handset users. BlackBerry’s SEM solution is designed
to securely manage credentials on subscriber identity module cards installed in all types of mobile devices,
including BlackBerry smartphones, Android devices and Windows phones;
Launched affordable new BlackBerry 7 smartphones (the BlackBerry Curve 9300 series) for customers in several
markets, including the U.S., Vietnam, Singapore, Kenya, Nigeria, Malaysia, South Africa, the Caribbean region,
Latin America, India, the Philippines and Indonesia;
Launched the BlackBerry Partners for enterprise portal to support independent software vendors, system integrators,
application hosters, professional services organizations as well as corporate developers looking to enable or deploy
BlackBerry 10 applications and services for enterprise customers;
Launched the 4G LTE BlackBerry PlayBook tablet with built-in support for cellular networks in August;
Appointed Kristian Tear as Chief Operating Officer, Frank Boulben as Chief Marketing Officer and Steve
Zipperstein as Chief Legal Officer; and
Announced that three new members joined the Board: Timothy Dattels, Richard “Dick” Lynch and Bert Nordberg.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Fiscal 2012:
•
•
Introduced the BlackBerry 7 portfolio, a new line up of smartphones running the BlackBerry 7 OS;
Introduced NFC technology to several models of BlackBerry smartphones, enabling BlackBerry smartphones to
receive information and link to other NFC-enabled devices or BlackBerry Authentic Accessories;
Introduced the cost optimization program designed to eliminate redundancies and reallocate resources to focus on
areas that offer the highest growth opportunities and alignment with the Company’s strategic objectives (the “Cost
Optimization Program”);
Successfully bid for the patent portfolio of Nortel Networks Corporation as a part of a consortium of companies,
making a strategic investment of approximately $779 million in order to significantly strengthen the Company’s
technology platform;
Enhanced the BlackBerry developer platform, and exceeded two billion BlackBerry World™ application
downloads;
Grew the global BBM user base to approximately 55 million active users with more than 325 socially connected
BlackBerry applications having been downloaded close to 60 million times, as of March 3, 2012. The Company also
launched BBM Music, a social music sharing and discovery service;
Launched the BlackBerry PlayBook tablet and, later in fiscal 2012, launched BlackBerry PlayBook OS 2.0, a free
software upgrade for BlackBerry PlayBook tablet users that includes new features to enhance productivity and
communications, including built-in email, calendar and contacts intended to deliver a socially connected BlackBerry
experience;
Announced BES 10, the next generation enterprise mobile device management solution for BlackBerry, Android
and iOS smartphones and tablets;
Introduced BlackBerry Balance technology with BES 10, BlackBerry Enterprise Server and BlackBerry Enterprise
Server Express, allowing enterprise users to carry one device and view both work and personal information in an
integrated way while keeping the content separate and secure;
Launched new cloud services for small businesses with the BlackBerry Management Centre and enterprises with the
BlackBerry Business Cloud Services for Microsoft Office 365;
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
8
Table of Contents
•
•
Announced the appointment of Thorsten Heins as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
appointed Barbara Stymiest as the independent Chair of the Board as part of governance changes implemented in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012; and
Experienced additional changes to the Board and management following the fiscal year end, including the
resignations of Jim Balsillie from the Board and Jim Rowan, Chief Operating Officer for Global Operations, as well
as the retirement of David Yach, Chief Technology Officer, Software.
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
Overview
A global leader in mobile communications, the Company revolutionized the mobile industry with the introduction of the
BlackBerry solution in 1999. Today, the Company aims to inspire the success of its millions of customers around the world by
continuously pushing the boundaries of mobile experiences. Founded in 1984 and based in Waterloo, Ontario, the Company
operates offices in North America, Europe, Middle East and Africa, Asia Pacific and Latin America. The Company’s common
shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ: BBRY) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: BB).
The Company maintains a strong balance sheet with approximately $2.7 billion in cash, cash equivalents and investments as of
March 1, 2014. In fiscal 2014, the Company had annual sales of $6.8 billion. Net loss from continuing operations was $5.9
billion, or $11.18 per share.
Industry Background
The Wireless Communications Industry
The wireless communications industry involves the provisioning of wireless voice and data services using radio frequency
(“RF”) technologies on a variety of competing wireless networks. These networks are typically comprised of a distinct voice
layer upon which data transmission layers have been subsequently installed. The most widely deployed wireless voice and data
networks include GSM/GPRS/EDGE/HSPA and CDMA/1xRTT/EVDO. The two primary international voice and data
networks GSM/GPRS/EDGE/HSPA and CDMA/EVDO continue to be upgraded to offer greater speeds and increased abilities
to support subscriber concentration in the same and new RF spectrums. The rollout of these technologies is well underway and
commercially available in many markets around the world.
Fiscal 2014 saw the continued uptake and expansion of next generation “4G” networks, including HSPA+, WiMax and LTE,
particularly in the North American markets. These networks offer a number of improvements over the previous generations,
with improved download and upload speeds being the most widely promoted. Wireless carriers in the United States have been
aggressively deploying and marketing these “4G” networks. Deployment of these networks remains relatively limited globally,
but wireless operators in many international markets are expected to move aggressively to these new networks in the coming
years.
In addition to voice and data communications, the convergence of computing and personal entertainment capabilities is also
occurring on wireless communications devices across the industry. Most BlackBerry smartphones in the market today
incorporate multimedia capabilities that include music, video recording and playback, camera, and access to games, content
and other applications.
Fiscal 2014 also saw the emergence of the “machine to machine” market as a driving force for the expansion of wireless
applications, accelerating the “Internet of things”, with many, if not most, operators establishing relationships, practices and
partnerships focused around this new market. “Machine to machine” or “M2M”, refers to technologies that allow both wireless
and wired systems to communicate with other devices of the same type.
Wireless Communications Industry Markets and Segments
Historically, the wireless communications market has been highly segmented. Where previously the market was segmented into
distinct enterprise and consumer/extreme productivity segments, the market has increasingly evolved in recent years and there
is now significant overlap between the segments. The enterprise market is now characterized by a combination of enterprise-
deployed devices and devices that are purchased by consumers but also used in the corporate environment, commonly referred
to as BYOD. These consumer devices are supported in a corporate environment by information technology (“IT”) departments
for access to corporate messaging and data applications. As the market has evolved, IT departments now look for enterprise
mobility solutions that can handle a range of requirements. The Company has introduced products to address this market shift
including BlackBerry 10 smartphones with BlackBerry Balance, BES 10 and the recently announced BES 12 platform, which
will unify the support for BBOS and BlackBerry 10 devices, together with that for iOS, Android and Windows Phone, as well
9
Table of Contents
as Secure Work Space, which give IT departments the ability to securely monitor and control multiple OS platforms, and
securely protect corporate data on an employee’s personal smartphone or tablet.
Products designed for deployment by enterprise IT departments typically include a smartphone or tablet that is deployed in
conjunction with behind-the-firewall messaging and other data servers. Consumer market offerings are chosen by the individual
user and carrier and may be chosen based on an affinity for a certain feature or capability such as browsing, multimedia
functions, instant messaging, games or other third-party applications. Enterprises that choose to support these consumer devices
in their enterprise environment typically deploy middleware to manage the messaging and security of enterprise data access.
The Company believes that the following factors influence commercial success in the wireless device and services market:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the ability to balance IT and consumer demands;
extensive geographic coverage and multi-network/carrier support;
access to third party applications and content;
connectivity to personal messaging, social networking, multimedia and other applications;
access to key corporate data stores;
connectivity to enterprise email and applications;
end-to-end security;
protection of intellectual property rights;
trusted and reliable brand;
return on investment;
push-based outbound port architecture;
integrated hardware, software and services platform;
intuitive interface and ease of use;
rich and efficient web-browsing experience;
competitive pricing;
attractive industrial design;
light weight converged devices;
reasonable battery life;
efficient bandwidth use; and
extensive customer care capabilities.
The Company believes that the barriers to entry to the wireless device and services market include the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
proprietary technology platform, including hardware, software and service expertise;
intellectual property rights;
existing strategic alliances and relationships;
existing customer and channel relationships;
access to components and established supplier relationships;
scarcity of highly qualified personnel;
significant capital requirements;
significant development costs and time-to-market;
manufacturing expertise;
regulatory barriers, such as Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) approval and network certification;
and
market and brand recognition of industry leaders.
Success Factors
A global leader in wireless innovation, BlackBerry revolutionized the mobile industry with the introduction of the BlackBerry
solution in 1999. Today, BlackBerry aims to inspire the success of its millions of customers around the world by continuously
pushing the boundaries of mobile experiences.
The Company believes that the following characteristics give the Company a competitive advantage and differentiate its
products and services from those of its competitors:
10
Table of Contents
•
•
•
•
•
•
Balancing IT and Consumer Demands. The Company has consistently developed products that balance end
users’ demand for features with the demands of IT managers for security and manageability. The Company’s
focus on enterprise-grade solutions continues to be widely embraced for its ability to meet the highest security
demands of regulated industries and large enterprises to the more flexible and open needs of smaller companies
or those with BYOD environments. To meet the growing demands of BYOD and corporate-owned personally
enabled devices (“COPE”), the Company has deployed its multi-platform BES 10 solution that gives IT
departments the ability to securely monitor multiple OS platforms, including iOS, Android and BlackBerry.
Further, the Company recently announced the BES 12 platform, which will unify the support for BBOS and
BlackBerry 10 devices, together with that for iOS, Android and Windows Phone. BlackBerry’s Secure Work
Space also provides a containerization option for iOS and Android users to manage both work and personal
content without having to sacrifice security. With Secure Work Space, users can securely access personal
information, including calendars, corporate contacts, intranet browsers, documents and email accounts without
having to set up a virtual private network.
Support for Multiple Carriers, Geographies and Network Protocols. The BlackBerry solution offers choice
and manageability for global customers. Through relationships with approximately 665 wireless carriers and
distribution partners in more than 175 countries around the world, the Company is able to offer customers their
choice of carrier depending on their needs in a particular geography. In addition, BlackBerry smartphones
support many network protocols, including GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS/HSPA, HSPA+, CDMA/1xRTT/Ev-DO
and iDEN, offering customers the best choice of carrier and network technologies for their particular region
without changing the underlying BlackBerry infrastructure.
Growth of the BlackBerry Application Ecosystem and BBM. Applications on BlackBerry embrace the
connected, social and “get-it-done” nature of the entire BlackBerry experience. BlackBerry applications can
take advantage of seamless integration into the core OS and can easily connect to other applications, giving
customers the ability to flow from application to application quickly and intuitively. BlackBerry 10 supports
application choice for BlackBerry customers giving them access to an array of applications as well as visually
attractive and experience-rich applications. In fiscal 2014, the Company launched its BBM service for free to
iOS and Android, responding to its users’ desire to be able to connect to all of their friends and family,
irrespective of the smartphone they carry.
BBM Allows the Company to Satisfy Consumer and Enterprise Users' Need for Secure and Private
Messaging Services. BBM allows consumer users to engage in private messaging on both BlackBerry OS and
BlackBerry 10 devices and other device platforms. The messaging can be in the form of chat, voice or video. In
the enterprise space, the eBBM Suite will allow customers in regulated industries to engage in private
messaging in a way that allows them to achieve security and meet their compliance obligations.
Access to Key Corporate Data Stores. BlackBerry Enterprise Server provides IT departments with the means to
provide wireless access to all four main corporate data stores from a single integrated platform. The BlackBerry
wireless platform is one of the only platforms in the market that provides access to corporate email and PIM,
corporate voice PBX and hybrid IP/PBX stores, real-time computing and corporate IM such as IBM SameTime
and Microsoft Live Communications Server, Microsoft Office Communications Server and enterprise
applications such as CRM, and enterprise social networking and collaboration applications such as IBM Lotus
Connections and IBM Lotus Quickr.
Security. The BlackBerry platform was designed as an end-to-end solution with comprehensive security
specifically for enterprise access to email, PIM and other corporate information from a single wireless device
(the “BlackBerry Enterprise Solution”). Through integration with Microsoft Exchange, IBM Lotus Domino and
Novell GroupWise, the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution provides corporate users with secure wireless access to
their own corporate email rather than having to establish an additional email account. The Company’s security
solution for enterprise customers includes end-to-end data encryption for confidentiality, robust remote IT
management and full application controls to allow customers to address mobile malware. Inherent in the core
platform is support for various Internet security standards such as SSL and IPSec, multiple user authentication
schemes, a secure boot ROM, signed API access and an embedded firewall. In addition to the security built into
the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution, the Company has developed a BlackBerry Smart Card Reader which
further enhances BlackBerry device security for a wide range of government users. BlackBerry Enterprise
Server Express has also been launched to provide enterprise grade security to the small and medium-sized
enterprise user free of charge. The BlackBerry Enterprise Solution has passed rigorous security assessments by
many of the leading security institutions around the world, including Common Criteria EAL 4+ certification for
BlackBerry Enterprise Server 5.0 and BlackBerry OS 5.0. BlackBerry was the first mobile platform to achieve
Common Criteria EAL 4+ certification. The BlackBerry Enterprise Solution has been certified by Fraunhofer
11
Table of Contents
Institute SIT, and has been approved for use under the CAPS program in the United Kingdom. In addition, the
BlackBerry Enterprise Solution is the only mobile data solution approved by CESG, the National Technical
Authority for Information Assurance in the United Kingdom to protect information classified up to and
including “restricted”. BlackBerry smartphones on BES 10 was the first mobility platform to be awarded an
ATO and an FOC from the U.S. Defense Information System Agency (“DISA”) on the U.S. DoD networks,
demonstrating BlackBerry’s ability meet the DoD’s most stringent security requirements. Prior to that, DoD
officials approved the Security Technical Implementation Guides for BlackBerry 10 smartphones to be used on
the DoD networks. BlackBerry 10 and BES 10 are also the first to have been approved by NATO for classified
communications up to the level of “restricted”.
Intellectual Property Rights. The Company has sought to protect the technology that it has developed through a
combination of patent, copyright and trade secret protection, as well as through contractual arrangements.
Strength of the BlackBerry Brand and Market Awareness. BlackBerry is a globally recognized, trusted
smartphone brand and continues to rank among the most recognizable brands worldwide. In certain markets,
brand alone is a strong influence on purchase decision.
ROI. The return on investment for the BlackBerry solution provides customers with rapid payback for their
purchase. The primary benefits include personal productivity and team workflow enhancements. The Company
continues to launch new IT administrator and end user features designed to lower the cost of buying, deploying
and managing the BlackBerry solution.
BlackBerry Outbound Port Architecture. The BlackBerry wireless solution uses a secure infrastructure that
does not require IT managers to compromise firewall security through the opening of an inbound firewall port.
The BlackBerry infrastructure offers a number of efficiency and security benefits to carriers and end-users.
These benefits are outlined in detail in this AIF under “Narrative Description of the Business - Competition”.
•
•
•
•
Strategy
The Company has announced that it is planning to transition to an operating unit organizational structure consisting of the
Devices business, Enterprise Services, QNX Embedded business and Messaging. BlackBerry offerings in each of the four areas
are differentiated and positioned around key themes such as security, productivity and communications. Based on the
Company’s broad product portfolio and areas of differentiation, BlackBerry’s current focus is on serving enterprise customers,
particularly in regulated industries including financial services, government and healthcare. The Company’s goal is to maintain
its market leadership in the enterprise mobility segment by continuing to extend the functionality of its BES infrastructure
beyond enterprise mobility management, to include application management, application enablement and application
development and, on top of this extensive foundation, deliver additional horizontal and vertical applications. To achieve this
vision, BlackBerry plans to align its businesses and operations around the four core areas to drive greater efficiency and speed
in bringing new offerings to market, while optimizing assets and capabilities across all businesses in support of the Company’s
overall strategy and financial objectives.
The four core areas of business focus are as follows:
Devices business
BlackBerry’s strategy in its Devices business is focused on delivering smartphone products that highlight BlackBerry
technology strengths and areas of differentiation, in alignment with specific market opportunities and target segments. As a
result, the Company expects to offer choice to both the enterprise and consumer markets through a portfolio of premium,
affordable, QWERTY and full-touch smartphone products. This portfolio will continue to include the manufacture and sale of
BlackBerry 7 smartphones for as long as there is demand for these products in the market. As described above, to drive cost
and operational efficiencies, BlackBerry has entered into a joint device development and manufacturing agreement with
Foxconn. The initial focus of this partnership is the development in early 2014 of the BlackBerry Z3, an all-touch BlackBerry
10 smartphone designed for Indonesia and other fast-growing markets. The partnership will also deliver the BlackBerry Classic
(initially announced as the Q20), a device targeted for BlackBerry loyalists. This device will feature classic BlackBerry features
such as the QWERTY keyboard, track pad and utility belt and classic BlackBerry user experiences and battery life.
The Company is focused on driving continued adoption of the BlackBerry 10 OS as a leading mobile platform. The Company
expects that the BlackBerry 10 OS will transition the Company from mobile communications into true mobile computing.
Expansion of the BlackBerry partner ecosystem and the development of end-to-end offerings that leverage the BlackBerry
product portfolio are also key elements of the Company’s strategy to re-capture market share in the Devices business.
Enterprise Services
BlackBerry believes it has the largest installed base in the MDM market through its BES platform. Security, reliability and
productivity are hallmark strengths of the BES platform and are instrumental to its success in the enterprise market, particularly
in regulated industries. BlackBerry intends to maintain and strengthen its position as a market leader in the enterprise market
12
Table of Contents
through a variety of strategies, including building a high-touch enterprise sales force, focused marketing campaigns, an
expanded partner ecosystem and the identification of alternative sales channels. In line with this focus, BlackBerry continues to
enhance its enterprise offerings and long-term product strategy. New pricing and migration programs are now available to ease
and accelerate customer migration to the BES 10 platform, such as the recently announced EZ pass program that will enable
customers to move from BES and other MDM programs to BES 10 or BES 12 at the silver level of service for free. In addition,
the Company has announced the next-generation BES 12 platform, which will unify the support for BBOS and BlackBerry 10
devices, together with that for iOS, Android and Windows Phone. The Company's solutions will maintain a key focus on
security, productivity and collaboration. The BES 12 platform is in development with significant enhancements to include
enhanced multi-platform support, an enhanced architecture for on-premise and cloud deployments and backwards compatibility
allowing unification of prior versions of BES. BES 12 will allow businesses to manage the growing IT trend of securely
supporting multiple devices and operating systems, as well as employees’ personal devices, within a single corporate IT
infrastructure. BlackBerry intends to have a continued strategic focus on regulated industries that rely on stringent security
needs, as well as on the government market where BlackBerry is the only MDM provider to obtain ATO and FOC status with
the U.S. DoD. Longer term, the Company plans to focus on additional value-added services to further enhance BlackBerry’s
enterprise offerings. For example, the Company has announced the planned launch of eBBM Suite, a family of products and
services to provide secure, enterprise-class mobile messaging. BlackBerry also intends to leverage its strengths and expand
further into new strategic vertical markets.
QNX Embedded business
Over the past 30 years, QNX software has become a significant part of everyday life, with people encountering QNX-
controlled systems while driving, shopping, watching television, using the Internet, or even turning on a light. QNX technology
is deployed by over 40 automotive original equipment manufacturers in more than 250 vehicle platforms in tens of millions of
vehicles throughout North America, Europe and Asia. Based on its proven technology and reputation for reliability, QNX
technology is a preferred choice for mission-critical, secure, life safety-critical systems such as air traffic control systems,
medical imaging equipment, and nuclear power plants. QNX enables powerful multimedia features and can be found in a
variety of products from automotive infotainment systems to casino gaming terminals. The Company sees the opportunity to
leverage its full product portfolio, including QNX, to develop machine-to-machine applications to enable a world of ever-more
connected wireless devices and plans to address this emerging market with the introduction of the QNX Cloud platform in
fiscal 2015.
Messaging
The Company is focused on expanding its base of approximately 85 million BBM users through platform enhancements and
cross-platform support. The latest release of BBM delivered numerous new features such as free voice calling over Wi-Fi, one-
click sharing of files and photos, Dropbox integration, location sharing and BBM Channels, among others. BBM Channels
extends the popular BBM experience to brands, artists, businesses and communities, connecting consumers and groups in real-
time. BBM is now available on iOS and Android platforms, in addition to BlackBerry 10, responding to smartphone users'
desire to be able to connect to all of their friends and family, regardless of the smartphone they carry. Future BBM releases will
be made available to Windows Phone and Nokia X customers, as announced in February 2014. The Company has also
announced that BBM will be pre-loaded on LG smartphones in markets around the world and a variety of Android-based
smartphones from leading OEMs across Africa, India, Indonesia, Latin America and the Middle East. The Company believes
that a corresponding increase in the user base for the BBM service could lead to increased opportunities for monetization of the
services offered through the platform, through advertising or through the implementation of the solutions by enterprise
customers. As mentioned above, the Company has also announced eBBM Suite to further extend the reach of the BBM user
base and as a strategy for monetizing the value of the BBM platform and its growing user population.
Additional considerations
For each of the four core businesses, the following areas-go-to-market/ecosystem, strategic investment, operations and talent
management-are critical success factors to the Company’s strategy:
•
Seeking strategic alliances and relationships. BlackBerry intends to broaden the scope and continue to strengthen and
develop its strategic alliances. The Company may also consider new types of partnerships and relationships that could
involve closer collaboration with other technology leaders to affirm and enhance the Company’s competitive position as a
primary mobile device and solutions provider. Areas of strategic alliances and relationships include, but are not limited to,
software application developers and companies, global telecommunications carriers, intranet and Internet applications and
portal companies, Internet social networking providers, multimedia content providers, gaming platform vendors, consumer
electronics retailers, microchip and other manufacturers, and global systems integrators.
• Targeted acquisition and investment strategy. BlackBerry will continue to evaluate and acquire companies and make
investments in products that provide opportunities for growth or expansion of the BlackBerry value proposition. These
may include, but are not limited to, companies or products related to software, wireless solutions, security, and
13
Table of Contents
applications, among others. The Company also intends to continue to acquire rights in intellectual property in various
forms and technologies when appropriate opportunities arise.
• Achieving best in class operational metrics. BlackBerry intends to further simplify business processes and target areas of
the business where greater efficiencies can be achieved. The Company is focused on driving best in class operational
metrics through the implementation of broad efficiency programs across all functions in the organization. Through the
Company’s CORE program, the Company is targeting areas such as product lifecycle management, supply chain
management and business support services to achieve best in class operational metrics. In addition, the Company intends
to continue transforming the organizational culture to reduce complexities and increase accountabilities while aligning
employees behind the BlackBerry vision, mission and values.
• Continuing to invest in highly qualified personnel. BlackBerry believes that the quality and skills of its employees have
been key factors in its success to date. The Company intends to continue its recruiting strategies and operations worldwide
to support its product development and growth strategies and ensure the needed strategic capabilities are in place.
BlackBerry intends to retain, attract and develop employees to drive organizational performance and foster an environment
of innovation, learning and development for the Company’s talented workforce while ensuring a cost effective
organization.
Products and Services
The Company’s primary revenue stream is generated by the BlackBerry wireless solution, comprised of smartphones, service
and software. BlackBerry service is provided through a combination of the Company’s NOC and the wireless networks of the
Company’s carrier partners.
The Company also generated revenue from the embedded market through licensing QNX software products and providing
professional services to support customers in developing their products.
The Company also generated other revenue from accessories, non-warranty repairs, BlackBerry World and gains and losses on
revenue hedge contracts.
The Company’s revenue mix from continuing operations for fiscal years 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
Revenue (U.S. millions)
Hardware
Service
Software
Other
BlackBerry Smartphones
March 1, 2014
3,785
2,698
235
95
6,813
$
$
55.5% $
39.6%
3.5%
1.4%
March 2, 2013
6,648
3,910
261
254
60.0%
35.3%
2.4%
2.3%
100.0% $
11,073
100.0%
The Company’s most current smartphones include BlackBerry 10 smartphones, powered by the BlackBerry 10 OS, and
BlackBerry 7 smartphones, powered by the BlackBerry 7 OS.
BlackBerry smartphones are available from hundreds of carriers and indirect channels, through a range of distribution partners,
and are designed to operate on a variety of carrier networks, including HSPA/HSPA+/UMTS, GSM/GPRS/EDGE, CDMA/Ev-
DO, and iDEN. In certain markets, BlackBerry 10 smartphones are also available directly from the Company at
ShopBlackBerry.com.
BlackBerry 10 Smartphones
In fiscal 2013, the Company introduced the re-designed, re-engineered, and re-invented BlackBerry platform that created a new
and unique mobile computing experience. Two new LTE-enabled smartphones powered by the new BlackBerry 10 OS, the
BlackBerry Z10 (all-touch) and BlackBerry Q10 (touch with physical keyboard), were introduced on January 30, 2013.
In fiscal 2014, the Company also introduced the BlackBerry Q5 (featuring a physical QWERTY keyboard and touchscreen), the
BlackBerry Z30 (featuring a 5” display and BlackBerry 10.2 OS) and the elite, all-touch Porsche Design P’9982, and
announced the BlackBerry Z3 as the first smartphone to be developed under the Company’s strategic partnership with Foxconn.
In February 2014, the Company also announced the BlackBerry Classic, an upcoming QWERTY smartphone that merges the
power of BlackBerry 10 with the classic BlackBerry design and experience, realized with hard buttons as well as an integrated
trackpad.
14
Table of Contents
Certain notable features of the BlackBerry 10 smartphones include:
• BlackBerry Hub (one dedicated place to manage all conversations and notifications);
• BlackBerry Balance (enables users to manage work and personal conversations by splitting out work and personal
accounts into different views within the BlackBerry Hub);
• BlackBerry Remember (a task manager that enables users to add tasks from anywhere on the device);
• BlackBerry Flow (enables users to easily switch between applications without exiting or using a “home” button);
• BBM Video with Screen Share (enables users to instantly switch their BBM chat to a BBM Video conversation);
• Time Shift and Story Maker (enables users to create the picture perfect shot with BlackBerry Time Shift mode and
create and share stories, weaving together photos, videos and music into a movie); and
•
Secure Enterprise Instant Messaging (enables users to securely communicate over Microsoft Lync, Microsoft Office
Communication Server or IBM Lotus Sametime).
In addition, BlackBerry 10 smartphones feature BlackBerry World, a content distribution storefront managed by the Company
that enables developers to reach BlackBerry subscribers around the world. BlackBerry World is available in over 170 markets
and supports 23 currencies and 33 languages. Over 6 billion applications have been downloaded on BlackBerry OS and
BlackBerry 10 from the over 400,000 applications available on those platforms in total. BlackBerry World provides BlackBerry
smartphone users with a way to discover and download/purchase applications directly from their BlackBerry smartphone.
The Company also launched substantial software updates to its BlackBerry 10 smartphone platform, including versions 10.1,
10.2 and 10.2.1., with hundreds of new enhancements and refinements.
The Company continues to be focused on serving its customers and driving the adoption of BlackBerry 10 and BES 10 around
the world.
BlackBerry 7 Smartphones
In fiscal 2012, the Company introduced the BlackBerry 7 portfolio running the BlackBerry 7 OS. These smartphones remain
popular and include the BlackBerry Bold 9900 series (9900/9930/9970) and the BlackBerry Curve 9300 series
(9315/9310/9360).
In fiscal 2014, the Company introduced a new BlackBerry 7 smartphone, the BlackBerry 9720 running OS 7.1.
BlackBerry Enterprise Service
BES 10
Launched in fiscal 2013, BES 10 is the Company’s powerful, enterprise mobility management solution. BES 10 represents a
consolidation of BlackBerry's enterprise mobility management product portfolio, which includes MDM, security, infrastructure
and application management.
BES 10 brings together device management, industry leading security and mobile applications management for pre-existing
BlackBerry smartphones, BlackBerry PlayBook tablets and BlackBerry 10 smartphones in a consolidated solution. It also
provides a single console for managing BlackBerry devices and devices running Google Android and Apple iOS operating
systems.
In fiscal 2014, the Company:
•
•
•
launched Secure Work Space for BES 10, a new containerization, application-wrapping and secure connectivity
option that delivers a higher level of control and security to iOS and Android devices, providing organizations the
flexibility to embrace BYOD on multiple platforms without sacrificing security. With Secure Work Space, users can
securely access personal information, including calendars, corporate contacts, intranet browsers, documents and email
accounts without having to set up a virtual private network;
launched substantial updates to BES 10, including versions 10.1 and 10.2, to further enable organizations to balance
end-user and enterprise needs with expanded capabilities to support multi-platform environments; and
announced a new pricing and licensing structure providing two simple tiers, Silver and Gold (each with differentiated
BlackBerry capabilities and features), and a new EZ pass program that will enable customers to move BES and other
MDM programs to BES 10 or BES 12 at the Silver level of service for free.
15
Table of Contents
BES 12
In February 2014, the Company announced its plans for the next generation of BES, BES 12. It is intended that the BES 12
platform will offer backward and future compatibility, unifying BES 10 and BES 5 on to one platform. BES 12 will enable
organizations to develop enterprise-grade applications that are quickly deployed to BlackBerry smartphones and other mobile
devices and provide customers with the ability to move securely from on-premise to the cloud effortlessly, and is expected to be
available by the end of calendar 2014.
QNX
The Company’s QNX software is primarily aimed at the embedded systems market. It is also the technology behind the
BlackBerry 10 OS. QNX technology is deployed by over 40 automotive OEMs in more than 250 vehicle platforms in tens of
millions of vehicles throughout North America, Europe and Asia. Based on its proven technology and reputation for reliability,
QNX technology is a preferred choice for mission-critical, secure, life safety-critical systems such as air traffic control systems,
medical imaging equipment, and nuclear power plants. QNX enables powerful multimedia features and can be found in a
variety of products from automotive infotainment systems to casino gaming terminals.
QNX unveiled new technology in automotive and cloud services at the January 2014 International Consumer Electronics Show,
including the QNX Acoustics Active Noise Cancellation and Engine Sound Enhancement products which can remove sound
from the vehicle cabin caused by advanced fuel saving techniques and add sound back into the cabin to allow automakers to
brand the in-vehicle experience. In February 2014, QNX launched the QNX Neutrino Software Development Platform
(version 6.6), QNX Software Development Kit for Apps and Media (incorporating a browser environment to enable HTML5
applications and the QNX Multimedia software, which enables playback and indexing of both physical and digital media
sources), QNX CAR Platform for Infotainment (version 2.1), which is built to enable the automotive electronics Tier 1 industry
to move faster from concept to production and supports the in-car user experience including media playback, smart phone
integration with hands free systems, voice recognition, vehicle health, with applications environment support for certain
Android applications.
In addition, the Company also announced that QNX expects to introduce the QNX Cloud platform in fiscal 2015, a cloud-based
machine-to-machine management and communication platform targeting embedded computing device manufacturers.
BBM
The Company’s instant mobile to mobile private messaging service, BBM, is utilized by over 85 million monthly active users
(as of March 25, 2014).
The latest release of BBM includes powerful innovations such as free voice calling over Wi-Fi, one-click sharing of files and
photos, Dropbox integration, location sharing and BBM Channels, among others. BBM Channels extends the popular BBM
experience to brands, artists, businesses and communities, connecting consumers and groups in real-time. BBM is now
available on iOS and Android platforms. Future BBM releases will be made available to Windows Phone and Nokia X
customers, as announced in February 2014. The Company has also announced that BBM will be pre-loaded on LG smartphones
in markets around the world and a variety of Android-based smartphones from leading OEMs across Africa, India, Indonesia,
Latin America and the Middle East.
In fiscal 2014, the Company also announced the eBBM Suite, a new family of products and services that work with BlackBerry
smartphones and the BlackBerry enterprise solution, BES and BES 10, to provide enterprise-class mobile messaging that brings
together the core strengths of BBM with features and capabilities aimed at enterprises. BBM Protected will be the first solution
offered in the eBBM Suite and the Company believes it will provide regulated industries the most secure and reliable real-time
mobile messaging in the industry.
Third Party Software Developers
The Company provides a feature rich open standards-based development platform which allows third party commercial and
enterprise software developers to build and deploy custom applications to run on BlackBerry smartphones. To facilitate this, the
Company provides a number of products and technologies to third party developers, wireless carriers and enterprise customers
to enable them to develop, distribute and manage these applications. For application development, the Company provides a
suite of software development tools for BlackBerry smartphones, enabling applications to be developed using technologies
such as Java, HTML5, Javascript®, Native C/C++/Qt with OpenGL® ES support, Adobe® Flash® and Adobe® AIR® and
BlackBerry 10 will run most Android Gingerbread 2.3.3 and JellyBean 4.2.2 applications without any code changes. The
Company released BlackBerry 10 SDKs in fiscal 2013 built on open standards and open source wherever possible in order to
provide developers with a rich development experience. The Company also provides a variety of advanced services to
application developers to enable them to develop deeply integrated applications that leverage online network services. These
advanced services include the BlackBerry Messenger Social Apps Platform, Push Service, Payments Service, Advertising
16
Table of Contents
Service, Location Service, Maps Services, Analytics Service and Scoreloop. Using these services, developers can create
applications that take advantage of integrated social networking services, push notifications, in-app payments and advertising,
advanced location services, application usage information, and social gaming features.
QNX Software Development Platform 6.6 will also run most Android Gingerbread 2.3.3 and Jellybean 4.2.2 applications
without any code changes.
The Company embraces open standards and includes a variety of open source libraries out of the box including Lua, OpenAL,
cocos2d-x, and Box2D and has an open source repository that can be accessed at github.com/blackberry. The Company
promotes an open ecosystem that makes it easier for developers to target multiple platforms through partnerships with
Appcelerator, Cordova, dojo, jQuery Mobile, Marmalade, NME, Qt, Sencha Touch and Unity.
For distribution and management of enterprise applications, the Company provides a suite of tools and technologies within
BES 10 to enable secure and managed provisioning of applications to enterprise employees. This includes capabilities for both
commercial packaged application and in-house corporate applications. Enabling vertically focused enterprise applications is a
key focus of BlackBerry. For distribution, BlackBerry World allows organizations to offer employees easy access to a catalogue
of trusted applications along with their own internal applications.
For distribution of personal and consumer applications, the Company provides wireless carriers with the ability to distribute
select applications and rich media content to their customer base and also provides BlackBerry World as a direct storefront for
BlackBerry customers.
BlackBerry® WorldTM is a content distribution storefront managed by the Company that enables developers to reach
BlackBerry subscribers around the world. Launched on April 1, 2009, BlackBerry World is now available in over 170 markets
and supports 23 currencies and 33 languages. Over 6 billion applications have been downloaded on BlackBerry OS and
BlackBerry 10 from the over 400,000 applications available on those platforms in total. BlackBerry World provides BlackBerry
smartphone users with a way to discover and download/purchase applications directly from their BlackBerry smartphone.
Users can purchase applications using their personal PayPal® account, credit card and through carrier billing. With 76 carriers
in 50 countries around the world, users are able to purchase applications and have the charge applied directly to their wireless
carrier bill. The Company is continuing to expand the reach and availability of its carrier billing service to many more carriers
and customers around the world.
Industry Associations
The Company is an active participant in numerous industry associations and standards bodies including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS)
American National Standards Institute
Application Developers Alliance
Auto Parts Manufacturers' Association (APMA)
Auto Tech Council
Bluetooth SIG
Connected Car Consortium (CCC)
Connected Vehicle Trade Association (CVTA)
Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)
Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC)
European Telecom Standards Institute
The Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI)
GlobalPlatform
GSM Association
IEEE (Professional Support Services for P1725)
International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
JEDEC
MIDI
MIPI: Mobile Industry Processor Interface
National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA)
Open Mobile Alliance
17
Table of Contents
•
•
•
•
•
•
Safety-Critical Systems Club (SCSC)
Secure Data Card (SD) Association
Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA)
UPnP Forum (Universal Plug and Play)
Wi-Fi – Alliance
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
The Company’s involvement with these and other associations includes standards development, government advocacy, joint
marketing, participation in conferences and trade shows, training, technology licensing by the Company and business
development.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
The Company markets and sells its BlackBerry wireless solution primarily through global wireless communications carriers as
well as through third party distribution channels which distribute the solution to end users. The Company has a number of
carrier-focused business units that support the sales and marketing efforts of the Company’s carrier partners through training,
technical account management and sales and marketing support. As of March 1, 2014, the Company’s marketing, sales and
business development, BlackBerry operations, customer support and technical support teams consisted of approximately 1,600
full time employees. In certain markets, BlackBerry 10 smartphones are also available directly from the Company on
ShopBlackBerry.com.
The Company sells QNX software and services, including development tool licenses, support and engineering services, directly
to customers using its QNX-specialized sales force, as well as through embedded distribution partners throughout the world.
The Company also collects royalties for QNX software shipments by its customers in such customers' embedded devices.
Customers
The Company is dependent on a number of significant global carrier and distributor partner customers with respect to the sales
of its products, both in terms of the numbers of devices sold and the aggregate value of its sales.
The Company sells to a variety of customers and there were no customers that comprised more than 10% of accounts
receivable as at March 1, 2014 (March 2, 2013 – no customers that comprised more than 10%). Further, there were no
customers that comprised more than 10% of the Company’s revenue in fiscal 2014 (fiscal 2013 – no customers that comprised
more than 10%). The primary direct customers for the BlackBerry wireless solution are wireless carriers and distributors.
The Company sells GSM/GPRS/EDGE, CDMA/Ev-DO/Ev-DO Rev A, UMTS/HSPA, HSPA+ and iDEN devices and software
to carriers, who in turn bundle devices and software with airtime and sell a complete wireless solution to end customers. The
Company also sells devices through indirect channels and these devices are resold by a third party with or without a service
plan from the Company’s carrier partners. Software is licensed directly to end customers, although it is distributed by carriers,
resellers and directly through the Company. The Company’s BES supports multiple networks and devices, so that BlackBerry
service from multiple carriers can be deployed within an enterprise using the same BES software.
In addition to sales via carriers, the Company offers its enterprise software and services directly and through distribution and
reseller channel partners. The Company has a geographically dispersed direct enterprise salesforce, which it is further
expanding, and a channel management organization.
QNX products, licenses and services are sold directly to OEM customers in a variety of vertical markets, as well as indirectly
through a reseller channel.
18
Table of Contents
The Company’s revenues by geographic region are as follows:
(in U.S. millions)
North America
Canada
United States
Europe, Middle East and Africa
United Kingdom
Other
Latin America
Asia Pacific
Competition
For the Fiscal Year Ended
March 1,
2014
March 2,
2013
$
$
491
1,320
1,811
604
2,387
2,991
907
1,104
6,813
7.2% $
19.4%
26.6%
8.9%
35.0%
43.9%
13.3%
16.2%
100.0% $
661
2,235
2,896
1,238
3,264
4,502
2,114
1,561
11,073
6.0%
20.2%
26.2%
11.2%
29.5%
40.7%
19.1%
14.0%
100.0%
The Company is engaged in an industry that is highly competitive and rapidly evolving and, to date, no technology has been
exclusively or commercially adopted as the industry standard for wireless data communication. Accordingly, both the nature of
competition and the scope of the business opportunities afforded by this market are currently evolving, uncertain and highly
competitive.
While the Company has enjoyed rapid growth in many international markets such as Thailand, Indonesia, Spain, Latin
America, and others in recent years, particularly in the consumer segment, the Company has seen its global market share
decline over the past several years relative to companies such as Apple with its iOS ecosystem, and companies that build
smartphones based on the Android ecosystem, such as Samsung. In the United States, the Company has experienced a
substantial decline in its largest market and experienced a large net decrease in its subscriber base. This decline is due to a
variety of factors including consumer preferences for devices with access to the broadest number of applications, such as those
available in the iOS and Android environments. Market share has also been impacted by the significant number of new
Android-based competitors that have entered the market, and a growing trend in enterprises to support multiple devices. In
addition, uncertainty relating to the Company's recently completed strategic review process, as well as previously-disclosed
announcements concerning the Company's operational restructuring, recent Board and management changes and the
Company's workforce reductions may have increased market uncertainty as to the future viability of the Company and may
have negatively impacted demand for the Company's products, including the BES 10 platform and BlackBerry 10 smartphones.
Despite increased competitive pressures in consumer segments, the Company remains a leader in enterprise mobility, with
deployments in over 87% of the Fortune 500 companies. BlackBerry smartphones in combination with the BlackBerry
Enterprise Server set the standard in mobile enterprise for secure, reliable and manageable mobile access to enterprise
resources and applications. However, trends towards BYOD deployments, wherein many companies are allowing employees to
connect their own smartphones to corporate networks, have increased competitive pressure on the Company in the enterprise
market. New products and services such as BlackBerry 10 smartphones with BlackBerry Balance, which allows for the secure
co-existence of enterprise and corporate data on BlackBerry devices, and BES 10, the Company’s next generation BES that
supports MDM services for BlackBerry 10 smartphones as well as iOS and Android based devices through a unified
BlackBerry administration console, demonstrate the Company’s continued innovation and leadership and are intended to
further solidify the Company’s position in the enterprise market.
Strategic relationships in the wireless data communications industry are also evolving. Specific infrastructure manufacturers,
network operators, content providers and other businesses within the industry may currently be customers of, suppliers to,
strategic partners with, or investors in, other businesses. The Company is currently working with a number of businesses, some
of which are direct competitors with each other and others of which are current or potential competitors of the Company. It is
unclear to what extent network infrastructure developers, enterprise software vendors, PC or tablet vendors, key network
operators or content providers and others will seek to provide integrated wireless solutions, including access devices developed
internally or through captive suppliers.
Providers of major mobile operating system platforms that compete with the Company’s BlackBerry platform include Apple
Inc. (iOS), Google Inc. (Android) and Microsoft Corporation (Windows Phone). In the wireless data communications access
19
Table of Contents
market, the Company is aware of a number of suppliers of access devices for public wireless data networks, including: Apple
Inc., Google Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., LG Electronics Mobile Communications Company, Lenovo Group Ltd., HTC
Corporation, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Microsoft Corporation, Nokia Corporation, ZTE Corporation, IBM Corporation,
SAP AG, Citrix Systems, Inc., VMware, Inc., Mobile Iron, Inc., and Good Technology Corporation. Competitors of the
Company's QNX business include Microsoft Corporation, Green Hills Software, Intel Corporation, MontaVista Software,
Mentor Graphics Corporation, and Sysgo AG. Products that compete with the Company's BBM service include WhatsApp,
Facebook Messenger, Skype, Line, iMessage, WeChat, Viber, Kik, Kakao Talk, Telegram and Snapchat. Some of the
Company’s competitors have greater name recognition, larger customer bases, and significantly greater financial, technical,
marketing, public relations, sales, distribution and other resources than the Company.
Providers of embedded software that compete with the Company's QNX business include Microsoft Corporation, which offers
a competitive product (Compact Embedded or CE) and offers the Windows 8 Automotive stack for automotive infotainment
applications. Apple Inc. and Google Inc. have not entered the embedded computing space to date; however, both have
demonstrated interest in the automotive sector. Apple’s CarPlay software is resident on the iPhone and projects via a wired
digital connection its own infotainment user experience onto the screen in an automobile. Google’s Android has been adapted
by third parties to power an automotive infotainment system, but the adaptation prevents these instances from Google
certification and access to Google services. Other companies and products competing with QNX technology include Green
Hills Software (Integrity product), Intel Corporation (Wind River Vx Works product), Open Source Linux, MontaVista
Software, Mentor Graphics Corporation, Micro iTron and Sysgo (AG) (PikeOS) in specific embedded verticles. In addition,
Nuance Communication Inc.'s SSE product competes with QNX in the acoustics market.
A variety of approaches are being pursued as diverse handset and handheld vendors attempt to provide mobile access to
corporate data. These approaches include smartphones, superphones, other mobile data devices such as tablets and netbooks, a
variety of middleware offerings and other end-to-end integrated wireless solutions.
A key aspect of competitive differentiation among industry participants involves the inclusion of a sophisticated NOC in the
system architecture. The Company pioneered the use of a sophisticated multi-node centralized architecture responsible for the
routing of messages to and from devices. The key benefits of the NOC are message delivery reliability, network utilization
efficiency and security. By isolating firewalls from the devices, NOCs avoid the need for numerous simultaneous inbound
connections through the firewall which is a significant security consideration for many IT managers. Other benefits of NOCs
include eliminating the opportunity for Denial of Service Attacks against the firewall, protecting against bad packets reaching
devices, and enhancing service quality by providing advanced compression and by acting as a buffer between the limited
capacity of wireless networks and the massive capacity of the wired environment.
Key aspects of competitive differentiation among other industry participants in the embedded software market and QNX
include QNX’s POSIX compliant micro-kernel architecture resulting in improved reliability, tools allowing developers to
understand their software’s behavior, and the in-depth knowledge of the software that QNX provides (as QNX wrote the
majority of this software and continues to maintain it). In cases where QNX did not write the software, detailed analysis is
available to aid its customers with licensing. These elements combine to allow the QNX software to achieve certifications for
medical, security and life safety critical applications.
Product Design, Engineering and Research and Development
The Company’s research and development (“R&D”) strategy seeks to provide broad market applications for products derived
from its technology base. As of March 1, 2014, the Company’s research and development team consisted of 4,353 full time
employees. Research and development expense was approximately $1.3 billion in fiscal 2014, compared to $1.5 billion in fiscal
2013.
Efficiencies in mechanical stack up, board layout, component integration and attachment technology combined with proprietary
software and firmware features allow the Company to customize its core proprietary robust hardware designs to address new
applications, network protocols and transmission frequencies. The Company’s tunable closed loop radio transceiver technology
can be adapted to support multiple protocols in the wireless data communications market, supporting its position as a primary
supplier of wireless and related hardware and software products.
The Company has developed its own radio code stack and incorporates this radio code stack into the processors that are
deployed in BlackBerry smartphones. Additionally, QNX, a subsidiary of the Company, has developed an embedded computing
platform utilizing the unique micro kernel POSIX certified OS, multimedia and infotainment platform-specific middleware, as
well as acoustic processing products. This QNX Neutrino OS is the basis for BlackBerry 10 smartphones and supports the
integration of all hardware components and security features.
20
Table of Contents
The development and support of the Company’s products require several key areas of expertise within the Company to be
closely integrated. The Company has recruited and developed teams with expertise in these required areas and the Company
believes that the integration and focus of these teams provides the Company with a significant competitive advantage. The
following chart outlines several of these key areas of expertise together with their design and user benefits.
Key Area of Expertise
Application & User Interface
Technologies
Design and User Benefits
Fluid, user-friendly applications with hardware acceleration for maximum performance;
deep integration into core experience
Rich tooling enabling rapid development and superior user experience
Power Management
Low power requirements – efficient battery consumption
Firmware
Integration, customization – low cost, small size, efficient battery consumption
Software Tools
Software development kits – more applications available
Testing Software
Fast and thorough test/debug – low cost, better quality, improved service/support
Mechanical Engineering
Robust design for highest quality standards deliver best in class customer satisfaction
Use of new materials guarantee slimmest packaging and integration of new technologies
Operating System Technologies
Richer user experiences, common application ecosystem, embracing of open standards
High performance, scalable and secure operating system platform spanning handsets,
automotive and general embedded markets
Multi-tasking and rich developer environment
Embedded Middleware
Highly scalable, modular software for infotainment applications
Product Design
RF Engineering
Display
Audio
Acoustics
Award winning products / outstanding customer experience through software and user
interfaces
High performance radio – low cost, small size, efficient battery consumption, better
coverage
High resolution bright displays with improved power characteristics
Improved audio quality in all environments through hardware and signal processing
design. Excellent multi-media capability
Echo and noise cancellation, wind buffeting removal, active noise cancellation, engine
sound enhancement
Intelligent Antennas
Effective tunable closed loop radiated power - better connectivity in fringe coverage
Analog RF & Digital ASIC
Integration – low cost, small size
21
Table of Contents
The Company’s R&D efforts are focused primarily on the following areas:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
developing productivity focused devices for current and emerging wireless network technologies and market
segments;
revolutionizing smartphones through the further development of BlackBerry 10 OS;
developing core technology and platforms for next generation air interfaces and networks, including evolution
of 3G and 4G wireless networks;
evolving the functionality, security and performance of its BlackBerry wireless solution and BlackBerry
smartphones;
building device software including operating systems, radio code, graphics and media frameworks, application
runtimes, networking technologies, and BlackBerry applications;
developing server and desktop software for enterprise and consumer environments;
developing infrastructure systems to provide the underlying support for wireless network and Internet
connectivity;
providing a platform and tools for third party software developers and enterprises to write and wirelessly enable
applications;
improving manufacturing and testing technologies; and
developing accessories to be used with BlackBerry smartphones.
The Company also engages in longer term fundamental research both directly and by selective funding of university research
projects.
The Company endeavors to take advantage of specific government and academic financial assistance programs
to support its research activities where available.
The Company dedicates a major portion of its R&D investments to software for the BlackBerry wireless solution. This includes
device and platform software as well as device applications, server software and infrastructure with an emphasis on satisfying
the needs of both corporate IT departments and individual customers.
The Company has previously entered into two project development agreements with Technology Partnerships Canada (“TPC”),
which provided partial funding for certain research and development projects. Funding received by the Company from TPC for
the first agreement (TPC-1) totaled $3.9 million and was repayable in the form of royalties of 2.2% on gross product revenues
resulting from the project. The Company was obligated to pay royalties on all project revenues up to a maximum of $6.1
million. The Company has fully repaid its obligations with respect to TPC-1. The second agreement with TPC is for a
development project (TPC-2) under which total contributions from TPC have been $23.3 million. The Company had fulfilled
all prerequisite funding conditions and recorded all of the contributions as at February 28, 2004. This contribution is repayable
to TPC in the form of a royalty of 2.2% on gross business revenues, subject to the Company maintaining a minimum number of
Canadian employees and to certain annual maximum amounts through fiscal 2015, not exceeding $45 million. The Company
has recorded $4.9 million (CAD) on account of TPC royalty repayment expense with respect to TPC-2 obligation during fiscal
2014.
The Company also qualifies for investment tax credits (“ITC”) on eligible expenditures on account of Canadian scientific
research and experimental development. In fiscal 2014, the Company recognized the benefits of its ITC in its consolidated
statements of operations as a reduction in income tax expense.
Intellectual Property
The policy of the Company is to apply for patents, acquire and/or seek other appropriate proprietary or statutory protection
when it develops valuable new or improved technology. The Company believes that the rapid pace of technological change in
the communications industry makes patent and trade secret protection important, and that this protection must be supported by
other means including the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, new product introductions and frequent product
enhancements.
The Company protects its technology through a combination of patents, designs, copyrights, trade secrets, confidentiality
procedures and contractual arrangements. The Company seeks to patent key concepts, components, protocols, processes and
other inventions that it considers to have commercial value or that will likely give the Company a technological advantage.
Although the Company applies for patent protection primarily in Canada, Europe and the United States, the Company has filed,
and will continue to file, patent applications in other countries where there exists a strategic technological or business reason to
do so. To broadly protect the Company’s inventions, the Company has a team of in-house patent attorneys and also consults
with outside patent attorneys who interact with employees, review invention disclosures and prepare patent applications on a
broad array of core technologies and competencies. As a result, the Company owns rights to an array of patented and patent
pending technologies relating to wireless communication technology.
22
Table of Contents
It is the Company’s general practice to enter into confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with its employees,
consultants, contract manufacturers, customers, potential customers and others to attempt to limit access to and distribution of
its proprietary information. In addition, the Company generally enters into agreements with employees that include an
assignment to the Company of all intellectual property developed in the course of employment.
The Company also enters into various types of licensing agreements related to technology and intellectual property rights. The
Company enters certain of these agreements to obtain rights that may be necessary to produce and sell products into the
wireless industry. The Company may also license its technology and intellectual property to third parties through various
licensing agreements.
Production
The Company outsources the majority of its manufacturing to specialized global EMS companies who are positioned to meet
the volumes, scale, cost and quality requirements of the Company. The Company strives to reduce its risk and dependency on
these companies by having various partners located in key geographical locations, thereby increasing leverage on cost, quality
and operational performance. Constant and immediate access to each manufacturing facility is available upon the Company’s
demand, and these facilities are regularly audited by Company personnel trained in this function. The Company also operates a
facility in Waterloo, Ontario, that is approximately 242,000 square feet and is primarily focused on New Product Introduction
(“NPI”) and research and development related activities.
In the coming year, the Company expects to continue to evolve its supply chain model, including through its new partnership
with Foxconn. The Company’s joint device development and manufacturing agreement with Foxconn demonstrates
BlackBerry’s commitment to the device market for the long-term and its determination to remain the innovation leader in
secure end-to-end mobile solutions. Under this new partnership, Foxconn is jointly developing and manufacturing the
BlackBerry Z3 smartphone for Indonesia and other fast-growing markets. The devices manufactured by Foxconn will be
purchased and resold by BlackBerry. The Company expects the partnership with Foxconn will enable the Company to focus on
iconic design, world-class security, software development and enterprise mobility management while simultaneously
addressing fast-growing markets, leveraging Foxconn’s scale, efficiency and supply chain to allow the Company to compete
more effectively while reducing the Company's inventory risk. The Company’s new hardware model will also strive to provide
a supply chain with speed advantages in designing for faster product life cycles, as well as to leverage scale and manufacturing
strength beyond current volumes.
The Company will also look to continue to enhance its new product introduction and supply chain planning activities through
further integration with internal research and development activities.
The Company generally controls sourcing decisions for materials and services that are incorporated into Company products.
Outsourced manufacturing partners are responsible for transacting business on behalf of the Company with component
suppliers, but the Company generally negotiates pricing of these materials and services. Depending on market conditions, the
Company may order more or less of a particular material or service and when possible, attempts to source components from at
least two suppliers with a view to avoiding different types of supply disruption. Component availability and pricing of
components may also be affected by the volumes the Company generates, compared to the volumes a competitor may require.
See also “Risk Factors - The Company relies on its suppliers to supply functional components and is exposed to the risks that
these suppliers will not supply components on a timely basis or of the desired quality; if the Company’s sales volumes decrease
or do not reach projected targets, it may face increased costs that could make its products less competitive.”
Regulatory Matters
In addition to the regulatory requirements applicable to any business, an access device manufacturer must obtain certification
from the radio/telecommunications regulatory authorities in most jurisdictions before commencing commercial sale of its
products in those jurisdictions. A significant competitive advantage exists for manufacturers with established businesses who
have previously met the certification requirements for their products and who are familiar with the regulatory process.
The Company’s products must be approved by the FCC before they can be used in commercial quantities in the United States.
In Canada, the relevant regulatory authority is Industry Canada. The European Community (“EC”) defines EC marking
requirements within the Radio and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment (“R&TTE”) Directive for use in EC member
states. Regulatory requirements are similar in other jurisdictions. All regulators require access devices to meet various
standards, including limits with respect to interference with other electronic equipment and safety standards with respect to
human exposure to electromagnetic radiation.
The Company’s BlackBerry wireless devices, which are made commercially available by the Company across multiple
markets, meet FCC, Industry Canada, and EC requirements. In addition, Company devices have obtained regulatory approvals
23
Table of Contents
required by other countries where such products are made commercially available by the Company. As BlackBerry has started
to design and market devices in selected regions only, not every device will meet FCC, Industry Canada and EC requirements.
The most recent example is the Z3 device, which is primarily designed for the Indonesian market and is not tested to meet all of
the FCC, Industry Canada and EC requirements. Whether devices developed under the Foxconn partnership will be tested by
the Company or non-BlackBerry labs going forward is currently under review.
At the present time, the Company has the required regulatory certifications for its testing facilities which allow the Company to
perform all the testing required by the FCC, Industry Canada, and the EC in alignment with the Company's plans for fiscal
2014 device development and release. The Company plans to continue upgrading its capabilities for radio technology
enhancements to align with the Company's plans for fiscal 2015 device development and release. In addition, the Company is
able to perform some of the testing which is required by other international regulatory authorities in some of the countries
where the Company’s products are commercially available.
Environmental Regulations and Costs
Some of the Company’s operations are subject to regulation under various provincial, state, federal and international laws
relating to environmental protection and the proliferation of hazardous substances. In parts of Europe and North America, the
Company is currently obligated to comply with substance restrictions, packaging regulations, energy efficiency ratings and
certain product take-back and recycling requirements. In addition, the Company may be required to comply with emerging
substance restrictions and product take-back requirements in other jurisdictions that would make the Company responsible for
recycling and/or disposing of products the Company has sold. These and other environmental laws may become more stringent
over time, may be required in more places of the Company’s business and may require the Company to incur substantial
compliance costs.
Corporate Responsibility
The Company is committed to operating in a sustainable way that respects the environment, Company employees, the
communities in which the Company operates and the Company’s business partners around the world. Product sustainability
efforts include implementing design for environment principles, material selection processes, energy efficiency and packaging
assessments as well as product take back programs. Additionally, the Company has formalized a number of policies to reflect
the Company’s commitment to responsible business practices and issues a Corporate Responsibility (“CR”) report annually.
The CR report as well as other documents and policies relating to the Company’s efforts in this area can be viewed on the
Company’s website.
Employees
As of March 1, 2014, the Company had 8,057 full-time employees: 4,353 in the product development area; 903 in sales and
marketing; 329 in customer care and technical support; 370 in manufacturing and supply chain; and 2,102 in administration and
business professional functions, which includes information technology, BlackBerry network operations and service
development, finance, legal, facilities and corporate administration.
Facilities
Canada
The Company’s corporate headquarters and new product introduction manufacturing facilities are based in Waterloo. The
Company’s operations are housed primarily in two campus-style developments. The facilities include 22 buildings, 13 of
which are owned for a total square footage of 1,561,600 and nine of which are leased, for a total square footage of 451,166.
The central Waterloo campus houses engineering, manufacturing as well as research and development groups. The Company’s
corporate, administration and finance operations are based out of the Company’s campus in north Waterloo, consisting of four
newly constructed buildings. Two owned facilities based in nearby Cambridge totaling 734,293 square feet are used for various
global logistics and repair services groups. As part of the CORE program, the Company has agreed to sell, has leased out, or
has listed for sale, 1,298,324 square feet of this space in Waterloo and 494,005 square feet of this space in Cambridge.
The Company owns or leases a total of 528,204 square feet in Ottawa. Engineering and research and development operations
are the focus of this center. In addition, the Company owns two buildings which total 318,936 square feet in Mississauga,
Ontario. In Eastern Canada, the Company leases a 10,700 square foot building in Fredericton, New Brunswick, and in
Montreal, Quebec, the Company leases 6,066 square feet. In total, the Company occupies 1,141,140 square feet in Canada,
outside the Waterloo-Cambridge, Ontario area. As part of the CORE program, the Company has agreed to sell, has leased or
has listed for sale, 570,147 square feet of this space.
24
Table of Contents
On March 21, 2014, the Company announced it had entered into an agreement for the divestiture of the majority of its real
estate holdings in Canada, with an expected closing in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.
USA & Latin America
The Company leases or owns a total of 37 sites throughout the United States. 981,018 square feet of this space are leased and
460,297 square feet are owned. The majority of this space is primarily used for research and development. Sales and marketing
activities in Latin and South America are supported by approximately 26,391 square feet with locations in Brazil, Argentina and
Mexico. Of the total square footage in USA & Latin America, 412,612 square feet was either sold or listed for sale as part of
the CORE program in fiscal 2014.
EMEA - Europe, Middle East & Africa
The Company’s operations in Europe are headquartered in Slough, England, comprising 68,893 square feet in total. Operations
in Germany are comprised of five leased facilities totaling 119,251 square feet, which are used for research and development
and sales. A number of other small offices are leased throughout Europe. In total, BlackBerry leases 433,656 square feet across
Europe, which are primarily used for sales and marketing activities. As part of the CORE program, 170,975 square feet of the
space in Europe is no longer being used by BlackBerry and was subleased in fiscal 2014.
Asia-Pacific
In China, the Company leases approximately 103,633 square feet, including space for research and development in Beijing. In
addition, a number of small sales-based offices are located throughout China. As a whole, the Company operates out of
Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand with a total space of
215,521 square feet for sales and marketing activities.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in litigation in the normal course of its business, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. The Company
is subject to a variety of claims (including claims related to patent infringement, purported class actions and other claims in the
normal course of business) and may be subject to additional claims either directly or through indemnities against claims that it
provides to certain of its partners and customers. In particular, the industry in which the Company competes has many
participants that own, or claim to own, intellectual property, including participants that have been issued patents and may have
filed patent applications or may obtain additional patents and proprietary rights for technologies similar to those used by the
Company in its products. The Company has received, and may receive in the future, assertions and claims from third parties
that the Company’s products infringe on their patents or other intellectual property rights. Litigation has been, and will likely
continue to be, necessary to determine the scope, enforceability and validity of third-party proprietary rights or to establish the
Company’s proprietary rights. Regardless of whether claims against the Company have merit, those claims could be time-
consuming to evaluate and defend, result in costly litigation, divert management’s attention and resources, subject the Company
to significant liabilities and could have the other effects that are described in greater detail under “Risk Factors” in this AIF,
including the risk factors entitled “The Company is subject to general commercial litigation, class action and other litigation
claims as part of its operations, and it could suffer significant litigation expenses in defending these claims and could be subject
to significant damage awards or other remedies” and “The Company may infringe on the intellectual property rights of others”.
Management reviews all of the relevant facts for each claim and applies judgment in evaluating the likelihood and, if
applicable, the amount of any potential loss. Where it is considered probable for a material exposure to result and where the
amount of the claim is quantifiable, provisions for loss are made based on management’s assessment of the likely outcome. The
Company does not provide for claims that are considered unlikely to result in a significant loss, claims for which the outcome
is not determinable or claims where the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated. Any settlements or awards under
such claims are provided for when reasonably determinable.
Though the Company does not believe the following legal proceedings will result in a significant loss, and does not believe
they are claims for which the outcomes are determinable or where the amounts of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the
Company has included the following summaries of certain of its legal proceedings that it believes may be of interest to its
investors.
On October 31, 2008, Mformation Technologies, Inc. (“Mformation”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Company
in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The patents in suit include U.S. Patent Nos. 6,970,917 and
7,343,408. These patents are generally directed to remote device management functionality. A jury trial began on June 19,
2012. On July 13, 2012, the jury found that the Company had infringed the asserted patent claims, awarding damages of $147.2
25
Table of Contents
million. On August 8, 2012, Judge Ware overturned the jury verdict and granted judgment of non-infringement as a matter of
law. On September 5, 2012, Mformation filed a motion for a new trial. On September 6, 2012, Mformation filed a notice of
appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. However, the Federal Circuit deactivated the appeal while the
motion for new trial was pending. On September 20, 2012, the case was reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen, in view of Judge
Ware’s retirement from the bench. Judge Chen subsequently denied Mformation’s motion for new trial on November 15, 2012.
On December 4, 2012, the court denied Mformation’s motion for relief from costs. The Federal Circuit reactivated the appeal
on December 20, 2012 after Mformation filed a new notice of appeal. On January 3, 2013, a new entity, Mformation Software
Technologies, Inc. (“MST”), filed a motion to substitute parties, alleging that Mformation had dissolved and that MST had
assumed the rights, but not the liabilities, to the litigation. On January 14, 2013, the Company filed an opposition to MST’s
motion, combined with a motion to dismiss. On April 8, 2013, MST filed its opening substantive brief. On November 21,
2013, after a limited remand to the District Court, the Federal Circuit denied both MST’s motion to substitute and the
Company’s motion to dismiss. On December 23, 2013, the Company filed its responsive substantive brief, and MST filed a
reply brief on January 9, 2014. Proceedings are ongoing.
On April 2, 2012, NXP B.V. (“NXP”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of
Florida (Orlando Division). NXP asserted that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,330,455; 6,434,654; 6,501,420;
5,597,668; 5,639,697; and 5,763,955. NXP alleges that its patents are generally directed to certain wireless technologies
including 802.11 standards GPS and embedded memory technology, as well as certain methods of manufacture for
semiconductor devices. The complaint seeks monetary damages, an injunction, and other relief that the court deems just and
proper. The Company filed its Answer on May 30, 2012. Prior to trial, NXP dropped patents 5,597,668; 5,639,697; and
5,763,955. The trial began on March 24, 2014. Proceedings are ongoing.
On September 10, 2013, Cypress Semiconductor Corp. (“Cypress”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California. Cypress asserted that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 6,012,103;
6,249,825; and 6,493,770, generally relating to reconfiguration of a peripheral device connected to a host computer. Cypress
also asserted that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 8,004,497; 8,059,015; and 8,519,973, generally relating to capacitive
touchscreens. The complaint seeks an injunction, monetary damages, and other relief that the court deems just and proper. On
November 4, 2013, the Company filed an answer and counterclaims. The Company asserted that Cypress infringes U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,834,586, 7,986,127, and 8,169,187, generally directed to USB charging. The counterclaims seek an injunction, monetary
damages, and other relief that the court deems just and proper. On December 2, 2013, Cypress filed an answer to the
Company’s counterclaims. Proceedings are ongoing.
On November, 4, 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit against Cypress Semiconductor Corp. (“Cypress”) in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of Texas. The Company asserted that Cypress infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,034,623, generally
directed to a radio modem with radio and telemetry functions, and U.S. Patent No. 6,833,686, generally directed to an adaptive
rate battery charging circuit. On January 13, 2014, Cypress filed an answer to the complaint. On January 30, 2014, Cypress
filed petitions for inter partes review for both patents in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. On February 4, 2014, Cypress
filed a motion to stay the lawsuit pending the inter partes reviews. Proceedings are ongoing.
On January 3, 2014, the Company filed a lawsuit against Typo Products LLC (“Typo”) in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California. The Company asserted that Typo infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,629,964, and 8,162,552,
generally directed to a keyboard for use with a mobile communication device. The Company also asserted that Typo infringed
U.S. Design Patent No. D685,775, generally directed to a keyboard design, and trade dress relating to keyboards. The
complaint seeks an injunction, monetary damages, and other relief that the court deems just and proper. On January 22, 2014,
the Company filed a motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin Typo from infringing U.S. Patent No. 7,629,964 and U.S.
Design Patent No. D.685,775. Typo filed its opposition on February 5, 2014, and the Company filed a reply on February 12,
2014. Proceedings are ongoing.
Between May and August 2011, several purported class action lawsuits were filed against the Company and certain of its
present or former officers in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, two of which have been voluntarily
dismissed. On January 6, 2012, Judge Richard S. Sullivan consolidated the remaining three actions and appointed both lead
plaintiff and counsel. On April 5, 2012, plaintiff filed the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, alleging that during
the period from December 16, 2010 through June 16, 2011, the Company and certain of its officers made materially false and
misleading statements regarding the Company’s financial condition and business prospects, and seek unspecified damages.
Defendants brought a motion to dismiss the claim with prejudice, which was granted on March 29, 2013. On April 25, 2013,
Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal. The appeal was argued on November 7, 2013 with judgment reserved. Proceedings are
ongoing.
Between October and December 2013, several purported class action lawsuits and one individual lawsuit were filed against the
Company and certain of its former officers in various jurisdictions alleging that during the period from September 27, 2012
26
Table of Contents
through September 20, 2013, the Company and certain of its officers made materially false and misleading statements
regarding the Company’s financial condition and business prospects and that certain of the Company’s financial statements
contain material misstatements. The individual lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed. The purported class action claims seek
unspecified damages. Motions for the appointment of Lead Plaintiff and counsel have been filed in the U.S. proceedings.
Proceedings are ongoing in all cases.
RISK FACTORS
Investors in the Company’s common shares should carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other information
contained in this AIF, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the
fiscal year ended March 1, 2014. If any of the following risks actually occurs, the Company’s business could be materially
harmed. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones the Company faces. Additional risks and
uncertainties, including those of which the Company is currently unaware or the Company currently deems immaterial, may
also have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
The Company may not be able to implement and realize the benefits of its recently announced strategic initiatives.
On December 20, 2013, the Company announced that it intended to focus on three key strategic initiatives: (i) returning the
Company to its core strengths of enterprise and security; (ii) implementing changes in the Company's Devices business to
provide operational flexibility to meet the needs of its customers and to mitigate the financial risk to the Company, including
the Company's joint device development and manufacturing agreement with Foxconn; and (iii) transitioning to an operating
unit organizational structure consisting of the Devices business, Enterprise Services, the QNX Embedded business and
Messaging. See “Narrative Description of the Business - Strategy” in this AIF for further details.
The Company's strategic initiatives involve a significant restructuring of the Company's business, a refocusing by management
on key strategic areas, significant organizational and personnel changes, outsourcing, and workforce reductions, including both
voluntary early retirement programs and non-voluntary workforce reductions. The challenges faced by the Company to
implement and realize the benefits of the strategic initiatives are significant, as described in the risk factors that follow, many of
which are beyond the Company's control. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to implement and realize
the benefits of these recently announced strategic initiatives. The Company may experience delays in the anticipated timing of
activities related to these initiatives, higher than expected or unanticipated execution costs, changes in competitive dynamics
that may reduce the effectiveness of the strategies, difficulties executing the strategic initiatives because of factors relating to
the Company, actions taken by the Company's competitors, assumptions made by management proving to be incorrect or other
factors associated with the often unpredictable and rapidly changing dynamics of the wireless communications and embedded
software industries. If the Company is not successful with these efforts, or if these efforts are more costly or time-consuming
than expected, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected, which could limit our ability to invest in and
grow our business.
The Company may not be able to attract new enterprise customers or maintain its existing relationships with its
enterprise customers or transition them to the BES 10 platform and deploy BlackBerry 10 smartphones, and
current BES 10 test installations may not convert to commercial installations.
On February 25, 2014, the Company announced new enterprise solutions, partnerships and smartphone models, including the
next generation of BES (BES 12) that will unify BES 10 and BES 5 onto one platform. BES 12 will enable organizations to
develop enterprise-grade applications that are quickly deployed to BlackBerry smartphones and other mobile devices and
provide customers with the ability to move securely from on-premise to the cloud effortlessly. The Company also announced a
new BES pricing and licensing structure (Silver and Gold) and a new EZ pass program that will enable customers to move from
BES and other mobile device management programs to BES 10 or BES 12 at the Silver level of service for free, the eBBM
Suite (a new family of products and services, including BBM Protected, that will work with BlackBerry smartphones, BES and
BES 10 to provide enterprise-class mobile messaging), the BlackBerry Z3 and the BlackBerry Classic (originally announced as
the BlackBerry Q20). While the Company expects these initiatives to improve and enhance its strength in enterprise solutions,
there can be no assurance that new enterprise customers will be attracted or existing ones maintained. In addition, while the
Company is continuing to see increasing penetration in BES 10 with approximately 33,000 commercial and test servers
installed to date, there can be no assurance that the test installations will convert to commercial installations, or that the
installations will result in equivalent levels of revenue that the Company experienced in the past. The Company also faces the
risk that certain enterprise customers may defer adopting the BES 10 platform until after the availability of BES 12 later this
year. The Company’s BES 10 and planned BES 12 products also rely on partnerships and software solutions with third parties
to deliver the solution. In addition, the Company's recently completed strategic review process may have increased market
uncertainty as to the future viability of the Company and may have negatively impacted demand for the Company's products,
including the BES 10 platform and BlackBerry 10 smartphones. If the Company’s new products are not competitive, do not
27
Table of Contents
align with customers' needs, are not launched as per the announced the timeline or if they experience quality or performance
issues, results of operations could be materially impacted.
The Company has encountered challenges due to the impact of BYOD strategies being adopted by its enterprise customers, as
many IT departments that previously required employees to use the BlackBerry wireless solution because of its emphasis on
security and reliability are permitting employees to choose devices offered by the Company’s competitors, and this has been
reflected through a decrease in the Company’s enterprise subscribers. Also, some of the Company’s competitors have increased
their marketing and product development efforts and focus on the enterprise market. To address this evolution of the market, the
Company has introduced BES 10 and has announced BES 12, as noted above. The Company will also continue to seek
partnerships that will further enable the Company to enhance these and potentially other offerings. However, there can be no
assurance that these new product offerings, including the BlackBerry 10 smartphones and BES 10 and BES 12 software, will
enable the Company to successfully address the challenges it faces from the BYOD trend in the enterprise space, either with
existing or new customers.
The Company may not be able to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services,
in a timely manner, at competitive prices, or to meet customer requirements.
The wireless communications and embedded software industries are characterized by increasingly rapid technological change,
evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions, frequent market price reductions, constant improvements in
performance characteristics and short product life cycles. To keep pace with technological developments, satisfy increasing
customer requirements and achieve product acceptance, the Company’s future success depends upon its ability to enhance its
current products and services, to address competing technologies and products developed by other companies, and to continue
to develop and introduce new products and services offering enhanced performance and functionality on a timely basis at
competitive prices. In particular, the Company’s future success continues to be significantly dependent on its ability to
successfully complete its transition to the BlackBerry 10 platform. The Company is also focused on developing an integrated
service offering focused on enterprise customers that leverages the Company’s strengths such as BBM, security and
manageability and that will continue to generate service revenue and enable the Company to recover the costs associated with
its network infrastructure. The Company has announced additional offerings relating to the popular BBM service, both for
enterprise and consumer customers, and has expanded the service to iOS and Android platforms, with a view to increase the
user base. Further, the Company announced in February 2014 that BBM will be made available to Windows Phone and Nokia
X customers in the coming months. The Company believes that a corresponding increase in the user base for the BBM service
could lead to increased opportunities for monetization of the services offered through the platform, through advertising or
through the implementation of the solutions by enterprise customers. The Company has also announced that QNX expects to
introduce the QNX Cloud platform in fiscal 2015, a cloud-based machine to machine management and communication
platform targeting embedded computing device manufacturers. The process of developing new technology is complex and
uncertain, and involves time, substantial costs and risks, which are further magnified when the development process involves a
transition to a new technology platform, as is the case with the Company’s BlackBerry 10 platform. The Company’s inability,
for technological or other reasons, some of which may be beyond the Company’s control, to enhance, develop, introduce and
monetize products and services in a timely manner, or at all, in response to changing market conditions or customer
requirements, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition or
could result in its products and services not achieving market acceptance or becoming obsolete. In addition, if the Company
fails to deliver a compelling customer experience, including marketing, sales support, activation and ongoing support, or
accurately predict emerging technological trends and the changing needs of customers and end users, or the features of its new
products and services, including its BlackBerry 10 smartphones, do not meet the expectations or achieve acceptance of its
customers, the Company’s business and prospects could be materially harmed.
On February 25, 2014, the Company announced new enterprise solutions, partnerships and smartphone models, including the
next generation of BES (BES 12) that will unify BES 10 and BES 5 onto one platform. BES 12 will enable organizations to
develop enterprise-grade applications that are quickly deployed to BlackBerry smartphones and other mobile devices and
provide customers with the ability to move securely from on-premise to the cloud effortlessly. The Company also announced a
new BES pricing and licensing structure (Silver and Gold) and a new EZ pass program that will enable customers to move from
BES and other mobile device management programs to BES 10 or BES 12 at the Silver level of service for free, the eBBM
Suite (a new family of products and services, including BBM Protected, that will work with BlackBerry smartphones, BES and
BES 10 to provide enterprise-class mobile messaging), the BlackBerry Z3 and the BlackBerry Classic (originally announced as
the BlackBerry Q20). In the past, the Company has encountered delays relating to new product introductions, and delivering
new products on a timely basis has proven more challenging than the Company had anticipated. For example, in fiscal 2013,
the introduction of the Company’s first BlackBerry 10 smartphones were delayed, in part, because of complexities in the
development and integration of a completely new technology platform, which contributed to lower than expected unit
shipments as customers worked through inventory and awaited the launch of the new BlackBerry 10 smartphones. If the
28
Table of Contents
Company experiences further delays relating to the launch of already announced or yet to be announced smartphones or other
products or services, such delays could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations,
financial condition and future prospects.
There cannot be any assurance that the technologies and related hardware or software products and services that the Company
develops will be brought to market by it or network operators as quickly as anticipated or that they will achieve broad customer
acceptance among operators or end users. In the case of the Company’s BlackBerry 10 smartphones, there can be no assurance
that the Company’s existing BlackBerry 6 and BlackBerry 7 customers will migrate to the new BlackBerry 10 devices, which
are offered for sale at a higher price point than many of the Company’s older devices. While the Company is continuing to see
increasing penetration in BES 10 with approximately 33,000 commercial and test servers installed to date, there can be no
assurance that the test installations will convert to commercial installations, or that the installations will result in equivalent
levels of revenue that the Company experienced in the past.
In addition, the machine to machine industry is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, and has experienced, and expects to
continue to experience, intense competition from a number of companies. No technology has been exclusively or commercially
adopted as the industry standard for machine to machine communication. Accordingly, both the nature of the competition and
the scope of the business opportunities afforded by the market in which the Company competes are uncertain. Specifically,
there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to develop, introduce, gain market share and scale the QNX Cloud
platform among intense competition and rapid change in this emerging market. In addition, the Company may be unable to
compete with automotive software solutions based on open source software distributions, including those based on Android and
Linux. The Company’s competitors, including new market entrants, may implement new technologies before the Company
does, and the number of new entrants in the machine to machine communications market can make it more difficult for the
Company to differentiate its products and services. In addition, the Company’s competitors may deliver new products and
services earlier, or provide more attractively-priced, enhanced or better quality products and services than the Company does,
which may, among other things, increase pressure on the Company to discount pricing on its existing and future products and
services.
Some of the Company’s competitors have greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial,
technical, marketing, public relations, sales, distribution and other resources than the Company, and such competitors have
increased their market share at the expense of the Company in recent years. The Company also expects that additional
competition will develop from existing companies in the wireless communications industry, from new entrants, and from
consolidation or other partnership or business combination activities within the market, as demand for machine to machine
products and related services expands and as the market for these products and services becomes more established.
The Company’s ability to compete successfully will also depend in large measure on its ability to maintain a technically skilled
research and development staff and to adapt to technological changes and advances in the industry, including providing for the
continued compatibility of its products and services with evolving industry standards and protocols and competitive network
operating environments.
Uncertainty relating to the Company's previously-disclosed announcements concerning the Company's operational
restructuring, recent Board and management changes and the Company's workforce reductions may adversely
impact the Company's business, existing and future relationships with business partners and end customers of its
products and services, and its ability to attract and retain key employees.
The Company has continued with its CORE program, including significant workforce reductions. The Company believes that
these initiatives increased market uncertainty in fiscal 2014 as to the future viability of the Company and may have adversely
impacted existing and future relationships with business partners and end customers of its products and services and demand
for the Company's products (including, in particular, sell-through levels for the Company's BlackBerry 10 smartphones). The
Debenture Financing also changed the capital structure of the Company and also added additional obligations in the form of
interest payments to the Debenture holders on a quarterly basis.
The Company’s success is also largely dependent on its continuing ability to identify, attract, develop, motivate and retain
skilled employees, including members of its executive team. Competition for highly skilled management, technical, research
and development and other employees is intense and increasing in the wireless communications and embedded software
industries. The Company’s ongoing restructuring activities (including headcount reductions relating to its Cost Optimization
Program and continuing efforts to streamline its operations and increase efficiency through its CORE program), the Company’s
governance changes, the challenges faced by the Company over the past three fiscal years relating to delays in new product
introductions, loss of market share, the Company’s share price performance (particularly for those employees for whom equity-
based compensation has been a key element of their compensation), the perception of the effects of competition on the
Company’s future prospects, and other factors, may impact the Company’s ability to attract new employees and retain existing
29
Table of Contents
employees. None of the Company’s executive officers or key employees is bound by an employment agreement for any specific
term. The Company does not maintain key-person life insurance policies on any of its employees. The Company’s restructuring
activities and general loss of key employees could disrupt operations, impair the Company’s ability to compete effectively,
impact the Company’s ability to successfully execute its strategies (including the transition to its BlackBerry 10 platform), and
affect its ability to address issues that may arise in the future as a result of a loss of institutional knowledge.
If the Company is unable to successfully execute its recently announced strategies and realize the anticipated benefits of those
strategies, it may be unable to maintain or enhance relationships with business partners and end customers of its products and
may not be able to attract and retain key employees, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
result of operations and financial condition.
The Company may not be able to offset or mitigate the impact of the decline in the Company’s service access fees on
its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering.
The Company currently generates service revenue from billings to its BlackBerry subscriber account base that utilize
BlackBerry 7 and prior BlackBerry operating systems primarily from a monthly infrastructure access fee (sometimes referred to
as a “service access fee” or “SAF”) charged to carriers or resellers, who in turn bill the BlackBerry subscriber. The SAF for
consumer customers historically has been much lower than the SAF for enterprise customers, who receive a higher level of
value-added security, encryption and other services by utilizing the Company’s BES platform.
Many of the Company’s competitors do not charge a SAF or equivalent fee as they recover their infrastructure and services
expense in alternate manners. Thus, the Company has faced significant pressure to reduce its existing SAF, especially for the
consumer market. In response to these pressures, the Company has been implementing certain price reduction programs in an
effort to maintain and grow its subscriber base. While the Company expects that existing customer and enterprise subscribers
using BlackBerry 7 and prior BlackBerry operating systems will continue to generate service revenue, the amount of those
revenues is expected to decline in the coming quarters.
As customers continue to transition to BlackBerry 10, the Company expects SAF revenue to decline further, but expects to
generate revenues to mitigate the loss of the enterprise portion of SAF revenue from enterprise customers that elect to utilize
BES 10, BES 12 and other new products and services. The Company continues to be focused on developing additional
integrated BlackBerry 10 service offerings focused on enterprise customers that leverage the Company’s strengths such as
BBM, security and manageability to generate new service revenue streams. Customers that require enhanced services,
including advanced security, mobile device management, secure enterprise instant messaging and other services, are expected
to continue to generate monthly service revenue. Other customers who do not utilize such services are expected to generate less
or no service revenue. The Company believes that offering alternative levels of service and pricing will better meet the needs of
its customers. In addition, the Company believes that by offering these services it may be able to expand the size of its
addressable market for recurring service revenue. The Company believes this strategy will help broaden the BlackBerry
ecosystem over time, which will potentially give the Company and its application developers access to a broader market into
which to sell their respective services.
The Company expects the transition from BlackBerry 7 to BlackBerry 10 to continue to be gradual, given that the Company has
a diversified global customer base, many of whom are in markets that are expected to transition more slowly to “4G”
wireless networks. As a result of the changes and the pressure to reduce its SAF as described above, the Company anticipates
further declines in service revenue in the coming quarters, which could be significant. The Company cannot predict this
anticipated rate of decline with any degree of certainty, as it depends on a number of factors, including the outcome of
negotiations with the Company’s carrier customers and distribution partners, the rate at which current BlackBerry 6 and
BlackBerry 7 customers migrate to BlackBerry 10 and use only standard BlackBerry services, the Company’s ability to attract
existing and new enterprise customers to use the enhanced services offered by BlackBerry 10, the Company’s ability to
continue charging SAF for its BlackBerry 6 and BlackBerry 7 products, and the Company’s ability to successfully develop over
a transition period a compelling integrated services and software offering that generates new service and software revenues
from the BlackBerry 10 platform.
If the Company is unable to develop, deliver and support a compelling integrated services offering that will mitigate the decline
of service revenue relating to SAF in the manner described above and enable the Company to recover the costs associated with
its network infrastructure, this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial
condition.
30
Table of Contents
Intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within the Company’s industry, including
recent and potential future strategic transactions by its competitors or carrier partners, could continue to weaken
the Company’s competitive position or may continue to require the Company to reduce its prices to compete
effectively.
The Company is engaged in an industry that is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, and has experienced, and expects to
continue to experience, intense competition from a number of companies. No technology has been exclusively or commercially
adopted as the industry standard for wireless communication, messaging or machine to machine communication. Accordingly,
both the nature of the competition and the scope of the business opportunities afforded by the market in which the Company
competes are uncertain. The Company’s competitors, including new market entrants, may implement new technologies before
the Company does, and the number of new entrants in the wireless communications industry can make it more difficult for the
Company to differentiate its products and services. In addition, the Company’s competitors may deliver new products and
services earlier, or provide more attractively-priced, enhanced or better quality products and services than the Company does,
which may, among other things, increase pressure on the Company to discount pricing on its existing and future products and
services. In particular, BlackBerry smartphone sales and shipments in fiscal 2014 were impacted by a competitive environment
in which multiple competitors introduced new devices and demand for the Company's new handheld devices was lower than
anticipated, leading the Company to offer sell-through programs as well as significant price reductions in order to drive sell-
through for BlackBerry 7 and BlackBerry 10 handheld devices.
Some of the Company’s competitors have greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial,
technical, marketing, public relations, sales, distribution and other resources than the Company does, and such competitors have
increased their market share at the expense of the Company in recent years. The Company also expects that additional
competition will develop from existing companies in the wireless communications industry, from new entrants, and from
consolidation or other partnership or business combination activities within the market, as demand for wireless access products
and related services expands and as the market for these products and services becomes more established. In addition, network
infrastructure developers, independent software vendors, smartphone vendors, PC, PDA and tablet vendors, Internet application
vendors, key network operators, content providers and others may seek to provide integrated wireless solutions that compete
with the Company’s products and services. The impact of competition could result in fewer customer orders, loss of market
share and reduced gross and operating margins. In addition, customers that may question the Company’s ability to compete or
remain viable as a provider of mobile communications solutions over the longer term could decide to replace the Company’s
products and services with those of its competitors. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete
successfully and withstand competitive pressures.
In addition, to the extent that the Company licenses its technology to enable other device manufacturers or software developers
to equip their products with BlackBerry functionality (including, in particular, the launch of BBM on Android and iPhone
devices), including the Company’s push technology, or use the Company’s network infrastructure, such action may have the
effect of impacting demand for the Company’s products and services, and the benefits of such initiatives to the Company
through the potential generation of alternate sources of revenue may not be realized in the manner anticipated by the Company,
or may not offset the competitive impact such actions could have on the Company’s business.
The intensely competitive market in which the Company conducts its business may require it to continue to reduce its prices.
The Company’s competitors, particularly some of those that utilize Google’s Android operating system, have in the past,
currently and may in the future offer deep discounts on certain products or services in an effort to capture or maintain market
share, to reduce inventory levels or to sell other products and services. Such changes can result in reduced margins and reduced
cash generation, may require the Company to record further inventory provisions, and could adversely affect the Company’s
results of operation and financial condition. The Company’s entry into the consumer market has already had an impact on its
pricing and this risk may further intensify due to the broader choice of smartphones, tablets and other devices, products and
services offered by multiple vendors in this market segment and the BYOD strategies currently being utilized or considered by
some of the Company’s enterprise customers.
Changes in the competitive landscape as a result of mergers or strategic partnerships can also adversely affect the Company’s
ability to compete effectively. The Company’s competitors may establish or strengthen co-operative relationships with their
carrier partners, sales channel partners, suppliers or other parties with whom the Company has strategic relationships, thereby
limiting the Company’s ability to promote its products and services. The use of Google’s Android operating system by existing
and emerging manufacturers, the pending acquisition of Google’s devices division by Lenovo, the pending acquisition of
Nokia’s mobile devices division by Microsoft and the acquisition of AirWatch by VMWare are examples of such strategic
relationships. Disruptions in the Company’s business caused by these events could reduce revenue, result in a loss of market
share, and adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
31
Table of Contents
The Company's QNX business is engaged in the in-vehicle automotive market that is highly competitive and rapidly evolving
and has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, intense competition from a number of companies and emerging
technologies. The Company’s competitors include new market entrants such as Google Inc., promoting an automotive version
of Android for in-vehicle infotainment systems through its Open Automotive Alliance, as well as the GENIVI Alliance
sponsoring a Linux-based infotainment platform. Emerging competitive technologies include the use of connected mobile
devices, using solutions such as Apple Inc.’s CarPlay, to leverage the capabilities of mobile devices to displace functionality
that would otherwise have been built into OEM infotainment systems. Other technological advances by competitors have
increased competitive pressure on the Company's QNX business' acoustic processing products. The impact of this competition
could result in reduced customer design wins, reduced software royalties, loss of market share and reduced gross and operating
margins. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully and withstand these competitive
pressures.
The Company’s ability to compete successfully will also depend on its ability to control the costs associated with the
development, manufacture and marketing of new products. In order to drive demand for BlackBerry products and services in
the United States following the launch of BlackBerry 10, the Company continues to run a comprehensive marketing and
promotional program. There can be no assurance that such promotional activities will be successful.
The Company may not be able to adapt to, and realize the anticipated benefit of, its recent Board and management
changes.
Upon closing of the Debenture Financing on November 13, 2013, John S. Chen was appointed Executive Chair of the Board.
Thorsten Heins stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Chen was named Interim Chief Executive Officer. Prem
Watsa was appointed Lead Director and Chair of the Compensation, Nomination and Governance Committee, and Thorsten
Heins and David Kerr resigned from the Board. In addition, in fiscal 2014, the Company announced the replacement of Brian
Bidulka with James Yersh as Chief Financial Officer, and the appointments of John Sims as President, Global Enterprise
Services, James S. Mackey as Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategic Planning, Mark Wilson as
Senior Vice President, Marketing, Ron Louks as President, Devices and Emerging Solutions and Eric Johnson as President,
Global Sales. The Company also announced the resignations of Kristian Tear (former Chief Operating Officer), Frank Boulben
(former Chief Marketing Officer), and Roger Martin, member of the Board. Though the Company believes that these changes
will help it transition and focus on its three key strategic initiatives, the Company’s success depends on its ability to
successfully adapt to these changes, to effectively integrate the Company’s new management team, and to implement the
strategies and achieve the goals outlined by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. If the Company’s Board and management
team are unable to accomplish these business objectives, the Company’s ability to grow its business and successfully meet its
challenges could be adversely affected.
The Company increasingly relies upon third parties to manufacture and repair its products and it is exposed to the
risk that these third parties may not be able to satisfy its manufacturing needs and repairs on a timely basis or to an
appropriate quality standard. In addition, the Company is exposed to risks related to changing manufacturers or
reducing the number of manufacturers or suppliers it uses.
The Company outsources the majority of the manufacturing and repair of its products to third parties. The resources devoted by
these third parties to meet the Company’s manufacturing and repair requirements is not within the Company’s control and there
can be no assurance that manufacturing or repair problems will not occur in the future. Third party manufacturers, or other third
parties to which such third party manufacturers in turn outsource the Company’s manufacturing requirements, may not be able
to satisfy the Company’s manufacturing requirements on a timely basis, including by failing to meet scheduled production and
delivery deadlines or to meet the product quality requirements of the Company and its customers. Insufficient supply or an
interruption or stoppage of supply from such third party manufacturers or the Company’s inability to obtain additional or
substitute manufacturers when and if needed, and on a cost-effective basis, could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
On December 20, 2013, the Company announced a five-year strategic partnership with Foxconn. Under this new relationship,
Foxconn will jointly develop and manufacture certain new BlackBerry devices and manage the inventory associated with those
devices. While the Company expects this partnership to improve the operating results from the devices portion of the business,
and to reduce the risk of excess inventory charges for products designed and manufactured by Foxconn, there can be no
assurance that the Foxconn relationship will yield the financial or operational benefits described over the term of the agreement
as the Company will maintain relationships with other EMS partners and has not previously had any experience in conducting
these types of arrangements with Foxconn.
32
Table of Contents
The Company’s reliance on outsourcing its manufacturing requirements to third parties may involve a number of other risks,
including:
•
•
an inability to obtain adequate manufacturing capacity and reduced control over delivery schedules and costs;
concerns regarding quality control, including in foreign jurisdictions where maintaining the integrity of the
control systems implemented by the Company may be more difficult to monitor and manage;
reduced control over the Company’s intellectual property;
increased risk of counterfeit and fraudulent activities giving rise to the availability of unauthorized devices; and
early termination of, or failure to renew, contractual arrangements.
•
•
•
The Company plans to reduce the capacity of, and ultimately divest, its current production facility, but plans to maintain a
manufacturing capacity in a new location focused on new product introduction manufacturing and related manufacturing
processes. If the Company fails to effectively manage its manufacturing and manufacturing processes so that its products are
manufactured to meet quality standards, third party manufacturing may be adversely affected. The Company may experience
difficulties in increasing or decreasing production at third party facilities, implementing new processes and finding the most
effective and timely way to develop the best solutions to meet the technical requirements of its customers and of regulatory
authorities. These difficulties may increase as the Company continues to develop increasingly sophisticated products.
The Company may not be able to implement and realize the benefits of its previously-disclosed operational
restructuring initiatives, including the CORE program, and may not be able to continue realizing cost reductions in
the future, including its efforts to reduce its workforce by approximately 4,500 positions by the end of the first
quarter of fiscal 2015.
As part of the Company’s continuous effort to streamline its operations and increase efficiency, the Company commenced the
CORE program in March 2012, a Company-wide initiative with the objective of improving the Company’s operations. The
program included, among other things, the streamlining of the BlackBerry smartphone product portfolio to offer a smaller
number of devices at any given time, the optimization of the Company’s global manufacturing footprint to reduce complexity
and improve delivery performance, the outsourcing of global repair services, the alignment of the Company’s sales and
marketing teams to leverage its marketing efforts more effectively and a reduction in the number of layers of management to
drive accelerated execution and decision making, improve performance and increase the transparency of accountability.
The CORE program was targeted to drive at least $1.0 billion in savings by the end of fiscal 2013 based on the Company’s
fourth quarter 2012 run rate. As previously disclosed, the Company was able to achieve savings of approximately $1.0 billion
as of its third quarter of fiscal 2013, one quarter ahead of the target. The savings were realized through lower material costs,
working capital improvements, greater efficiencies in manufacturing and supply chain management, overall headcount
reductions and leveraging third-party providers to assist in reducing indirect spending. In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the
Company further disclosed that, by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015, the program was targeted to reduce operating
expenses by 50% compared to the run rate at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2014. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the
Company achieved this target and reduced quarterly operating expenditures by approximately 51% compared to the first quarter
of fiscal 2014. As part of the CORE program, the Company announced in March 2014 that it had entered into an agreement for
the divestiture of the majority of its real estate holdings in Canada, with an expected closing in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.
The Company has incurred significant costs in implementing the Cost Optimization Program and the CORE program, all of
which have had and may continue to have a significant effect on the Company's GAAP net income. There can be no assurance
that the cost reductions achieved under either program can be sustained given the competitive nature of the Company’s industry
and the operational restructuring being undertaken by the Company, including the planned transition to four business units, or
that future initiatives designed to reduce the Company’s spending will be successful or achieve any or all of the results desired
or result in the optimal allocation of Company resources. As part of the Company’s CORE program, the Company has
significantly changed the way it manufactures its devices, including the reduction of EMS partners it uses and the addition of
Foxconn as a strategic EMS partner, the number of locations it manufactures from, how it provides after-market support
services and the suppliers it uses. These changes, and other changes to its supply chain, could increase the risk of production
delays, quality issues and customer satisfaction issues which could significantly impact the Company’s future financial results.
33
Table of Contents
The workforce reductions implemented in relation to the Company's CORE program may result in a disruption to
critical business processes and the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls.
The Company relies on the experience and industry knowledge of key employees to execute critical business processes and
perform internal controls. The Company's workforce reduction activities have created uncertainty that has led to an increase in
attrition and challenges in retaining qualified personnel, which exposes the Company to risk of process and internal control
failures.
The Company’s ability to sell, deliver and support the BlackBerry wireless solution is dependent on establishing
and maintaining relationships with network carriers and distributors.
The Company is dependent on its ability to establish, maintain and develop new relationships, and to build on existing
relationships, with its network carrier partners, which the Company relies on to promote and deliver current and future products
and services, and to grow its subscriber base, particularly in the United States, Canada and Europe where the Company is
dependent on a limited number of network carriers. In addition, the Company’s ability to establish, maintain and expand its
market reach is increasingly dependent on establishing and maintaining distribution relationships with third party and indirect
distributors. This is particularly the case in emerging and growth markets such as the Middle East, Asia and Latin America.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in establishing new relationships, or maintaining or enhancing
its existing relationships, with network carriers or distributors. Non-performance by the Company under its contracts with
network carriers or distributors may have significant adverse consequences that may involve penalties to be paid by the
Company for non-performance. If any significant customer discontinues its relationship with the Company for any reason, or
reduces or postpones current or expected purchase commitments for products and services, the Company’s business, results of
operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Factors, some of which are largely within the control of network carriers and distributors, that are important to the success of
the BlackBerry wireless solution, future product and service revenue and the growth of the Company’s subscriber base, include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the quality and coverage area of voice and data services offered by the carriers;
the degree to which carriers and distributors actively promote or subsidize the Company’s products and the size
of the subscriber base to which these efforts are directed;
the extent to which carriers and distributors offer and promote competitive products and services;
the continued generation of service revenues from billings to BlackBerry subscribers from service access fees
that are charged to a carrier or reseller, which the carrier or reseller in turn bills to the BlackBerry subscriber,
and the willingness of the carriers to pay such fees;
the pricing and terms of voice and data plans that carriers will offer for use with the BlackBerry wireless
solution, including any subsidy programs;
sales growth of wireless devices, along with the related service, software and other revenues with respect to the
BlackBerry wireless solution;
activations of BlackBerry subscriber accounts, as well as retention of existing ones;
the carriers’ interest in testing, and certifying in a timely manner, the Company’s products on their networks;
network performance and required investments in upgrades;
future investments in evolving network technologies and support for new software technologies; and
continued support and distribution of the Company’s products and services if claims involving its products are
filed against its carriers and licensees as well as against the Company.
Most network carriers and distributors sell products and services of the Company’s competitors. If the Company’s competitors
offer their products and services to the carriers and distributors on more favorable contractual or business terms, have more
products and services available, or those products and services are, or are perceived to be, in higher demand by end users, or are
more lucrative for the carriers and distributors, there may be continued pressure on the Company to reduce the price of its
products and services, or those carriers and distributors may stop carrying the Company’s products or de-emphasize the sale of
its products and services in favor of the Company’s competitors, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business, results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that the network carriers and distributors will
act in a manner that will promote the success of the Company’s products and services.
The Company has a number of significant customers and large complex contracts with respect to sales of the majority of its
products and services. Revenue from network carriers represented approximately 60% of revenue for fiscal 2014, compared to
approximately 63% of revenue for fiscal 2013. If any significant customer discontinues its relationship with the Company for
any reason, reduces or postpones current or expected purchase commitments for the Company’s products and services, or
promotes the products and services of a competitor over those of the Company, it could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. There were no customers that comprised more than 10% of
accounts receivable as at March 1, 2014 (March 2, 2013 – no customers that comprised more than 10%). Additionally, there
34
Table of Contents
were no customers that comprised more than 10% of the Company’s revenue in fiscal 2014 (fiscal 2013 – no customers that
comprised more than 10%; fiscal 2012 – no customers that comprised more than 10%). The Company’s ability to replace or
find new large customers is necessarily limited due to the limited number of wireless carriers and distributors in many
territories.
The Company, in the normal course of business, monitors the financial condition of its customers and reviews the credit history
of each new customer. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts intended to correspond to the specific
credit risk of its customers, historical trends, and economic circumstances. The Company’s allowances for doubtful accounts
may prove to be inaccurate or insufficient. If the Company experiences significant net bad debts expense for any reason, there
could be a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Company’s ability to maintain or increase its liquidity, its existing cash balance, its ability to access existing or
potential alternative sources of funding, the sufficiency of its financial resources, and its ability to service its debt,
could be adversely affected by its ability to offer competitive products and services in a timely manner at
competitive prices, its ability to collect accounts receivables in jurisdictions with foreign currency controls and its
access to the capital markets.
As of the end of fiscal 2014, the Company had cash, cash equivalents and investments of approximately $2.7 billion with $1.25
billion in indebtedness as a result of the Debenture Financing. The Company generates cash from sales of its products and
services and investment income to fund its operations and investments. The Company’s working capital requirements and cash
flows historically have been, and are expected to continue to be, subject to quarterly and yearly fluctuations, depending on such
factors as timing and success of new product introductions, levels of sales, returns on the Company’s investment portfolio,
timing of deliveries and collection of receivables, inventory levels, capital expenditures, operating expenses, and customer and
supplier terms and conditions.
The Company’s ability to maintain or increase its cash flow and working capital could be adversely affected if it is unable to
successfully drive adoption of the BlackBerry 10 platform or to enhance service revenues or exploit other opportunities for
generation of revenues. In addition, if the Company fails to accurately predict emerging technological trends and the changing
needs of customers and end users, or the features of its new products and services, including its BlackBerry 10 smartphones do
not meet the expectations or achieve acceptance of its customers, its cash flow, liquidity and financial condition could be
materially harmed. The Company believes that its liquidity position will be strongly influenced by end user adoption of its
BlackBerry 10 platform, by the Company’s ability to sustain the benefits and cost savings achieved through its CORE program
and by its ability to mitigate declining revenues from service access fees.
The Company has, and may from time to time have, third party debt service obligations pursuant to its outstanding
indebtedness, including the Debentures and any drawings under its existing asset-backed lending facility. The Company's
ability to make required payments on this indebtedness depends on its financial and operating performance, which is subject to
prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business, and other factors beyond the Company's
control, including market liquidity conditions, increased operating costs, and trends in the Company's industry. If the
Company's cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund these debt service obligations, the Company may be forced
to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital, or restructure or refinance its indebtedness. In
addition, the terms of any such indebtedness require the Company to meet certain financial tests and impose certain negative
covenants, which may prevent the Company from accessing additional indebtedness or other sources of funding, or pursuing
certain business opportunities and taking certain actions that may be in its interest. There can be no assurance that the credit
facility will continue to be available on its current terms or at all. See also the Risk Factor entitled: “The Company has recently
incurred significant indebtedness, which could adversely affect its operating flexibility and financial condition.”
The Company also conducts business in certain foreign jurisdictions that have legislation or regulations relating to the issuance
of cross-border payments in U.S. dollars, or in other currencies that will exit those countries. Examples of these countries with
foreign currency controls are Venezuela and Argentina, among others. The Company actively manages its exposure in these
jurisdictions based on the existing rules and regulations in place. If the rules or regulations relating to the payment of foreign
currencies in these or other countries change or if the countries devalue their currencies compared to other currencies, the
Company may not be able to collect the amounts owing for the delivery of products and services and this would have a
negative impact on the Company’s cash balance.
The Company continues to have accounts receivables outstanding related to service access fees provided to wireless service
providers in Venezuela that, due to recent political and economic events in that Venezuela (including a significant devaluation
of the Venezuelan Bolivar in 2013), and combined with that country's existing and recently amended foreign currency
restrictions, raise significant uncertainty about the availability of U.S. dollars for the payment of the Company’s invoices. The
35
Table of Contents
Company does not sell smartphones directly into the Venezuelan market, nor does it have any operations in Venezuela.
Moreover, the Company only invoices its carrier partners in Venezuela in U.S. dollars for service access fees provided to the
BlackBerry subscriber base. The invoices are reviewed by the carriers and subsequently, an application is made by them to the
government-operated Foreign Exchange Administration Board (“CADIVI”) in Venezuela to obtain the necessary U.S. dollars
to settle their obligations to the Company. Foreign currency restrictions and other foreign exchange mechanisms implemented
by the Venezuelan government have impacted the ability of the Company’s Venezuelan carrier partners to timely obtain U.S.
dollars in exchange for Venezuelan Bolivars, and the Company is continuing to monitor development in this area as it considers
strategies to secure payment of its outstanding invoices. The application and approval process continue to be delayed and the
Company's ability to timely obtain U.S. dollars at the official exchange rate remains uncertain. As of March 1, 2014, the
Company has been successful in collecting some service revenues from wireless service providers in Venezuela and will
continue to closely monitor its efforts in future periods. Further, the Company deferred all service revenue associated with
services rendered in fiscal 2014 of approximately $261 million. As a result of the currency devaluation and given the
uncertainty around future changes to the Venezuela leadership, the Company could face additional challenges in obtaining
payment on its receivables if the Venezuela carriers cannot secure governmental approvals to buy and remit U.S. dollars for
services provided.
The Company also experienced similar currency-related issues in Argentina in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, which led to the
deterioration of collections from the carriers to whom the Company provides services. As a result, the Company recorded a
service revenue deferral of approximately $13 million of service revenue associated with service access fees charged to
customers in Argentina in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
Similar currency control challenges are also being experienced in Nigeria and Egypt, among other markets where the Company
operates. Although the Company monitors the political and economic situations in these countries, there are no assurances that
the Company will be successful in the collection of its receivables, or that the laws and regulations that governs foreign
currency controls will not reduce the Company’s capacity to collect funds.
If the Company is unable to maintain or increase its cash balance, it may be required to raise additional funds through the
issuance of equity, additional debt or a combination of equity and debt, or may be required to reduce or delay capital
expenditures, further reduce costs, reallocate resources within the Company or consider other alternatives. Access to additional
capital may not, however, be available on terms acceptable to the Company or at all. Furthermore, any future equity or equity-
linked offering could be dilutive to existing shareholders and any drawdown on the Company’s existing credit facility or any
future debt financing would require the Company to dedicate a portion of its cash flow to payments on indebtedness, would
require the Company to comply with restrictive covenants or to meet certain financial tests, and would limit the Company’s
flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in its business. There can be no assurance that the Company’s strategies will be
successful or that it will be able to maintain or increase its cash balance.
The Company has recently incurred significant indebtedness, which could adversely affect its operating flexibility
and financial condition.
The Company has, and may from time to time in the future have, third-party debt service obligations pursuant to its outstanding
indebtedness, which currently includes $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of Debentures and drawings under its asset-
backed lending facility. The degree to which the Company is leveraged could have important consequences, including:
•
•
•
•
the Company’s ability to obtain additional debt financing for working capital, capital expenditures, strategic initiatives
or other business purposes in the future may be limited;
a portion of the Company’s cash flow from operations or other capital resources will be dedicated to the payment of
the principal of, and/or interest on, indebtedness, thereby reducing funds available for working capital, capital
expenditures, strategic initiatives or other business purposes;
the Company may be more vulnerable to adverse economic and industry conditions as a result of its debt service
obligations, including as a result of borrowings at variable rates of interest, which exposes the Company to the risk of
increased interest rates; and
the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to changes in, its business and industry may be limited. In
addition, certain of the Company’s competitors may operate on a less leveraged basis, or without such restrictive
covenants and therefore could have greater generating and financing flexibility than the Company.
The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments of interest on, and to refinance, its indebtedness will depend upon its
future operating performance and cash flow, which are subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, competitive,
business and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. The Company’s business may not generate
sufficient cash flow from operations in the future, which could result in its inability to pay amounts due under its outstanding
indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs. If the Company does not have sufficient cash flow from operations, it may be
36
Table of Contents
required to refinance all or part of its then existing indebtedness (including the Debentures), sell assets, reduce or delay capital
expenditures or seek to raise additional capital, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business,
operations and financial position.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to refinance its indebtedness as principal amounts become due, or that
it will be able to do so on terms as favourable as those currently in place. The Company’s ability to restructure or refinance its
indebtedness, including the Debentures, will depend on the condition of the capital markets and the Company’s financial
condition at such time. Any refinancing of the Company’s indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require the
Company to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict its operations. In addition, the terms of existing
or future debt agreements, including the Indenture (as defined below in “Description of Capital Structure - Convertible
Debentures”), may restrict the Company from adopting any of these alternatives. Further, upon the occurrence of a Change of
Control (as defined in the Indenture), the Company would be obliged to make an offer to purchase the outstanding Debentures
at a premium, which would require the Company to secure capital. If the Company is unable to refinance its indebtedness, or is
only able to refinance indebtedness on less favourable terms, this may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business, operations and financial position.
Certain of the Company’s indebtedness, including the Debentures and the asset-backed lending facility, is subject to restrictive
and other covenants that may limit the discretion of the Company and its subsidiaries with respect to certain business matters.
These covenants place restrictions upon, among other things, the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness or provide
guarantees in respect of obligations, create liens or other encumbrances, pay dividends, merge or consolidate with another
entity and enter into any speculative hedging transaction. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the
Company outstanding indebtedness, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operations and
financial position.
The Company faces substantial inventory and other asset risk, including risks related to its ability to sell its
inventory of BlackBerry 10 products, manage its purchase obligations with its manufacturing partners and the
potential for additional charges related to its inventory, as well as risks related to its ability to mitigate inventory
risk through its new partnership with Foxconn.
As the Company develops or announces new products and services, many of its older products and services will reach the end
of their life cycle. In addition, the Company may decide or may be required to discontinue sales of certain products or services,
or not pursue the development of certain products or services, as a result of such factors including expected demand, lower than
expected sales, litigation or government action. As the Company discontinues the manufacturing and sale of these products and
services, the Company must manage the liquidation of inventory, supplier commitments and customer expectations. In addition,
the Company records a write-down for product and component inventories that have become obsolete, can no longer be sold or
exceed anticipated demand or net realizable value, and accrues necessary cancellation fee reserves for orders of excess products
and components. The Company’s financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected in the
future by the Company’s ability to manage its inventory levels and respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns.
No assurance can be given that the Company will not incur additional related charges with respect to its existing or future
products given the rapid and unpredictable pace of product obsolescence in the industries in which the Company competes.
There is also no assurance that the Company’s strategic five year relationship with Foxconn will eliminate the risk of these
charges occurring in the future.
The Company must order components for its products and build inventory in advance of product announcements and
shipments. Components are normally acquired through a combination of purchase orders, supplier contracts, open orders and,
where appropriate, prepayments, in each case based on projected demand. Because the Company’s markets are volatile,
competitive and subject to rapid technology and price changes, there is a risk the Company will forecast incorrectly and order
or produce excess or insufficient inventories of components or products. The BlackBerry 10 launch in particular required the
Company to significantly increase its component orders to meet the estimated anticipated demand for the new smartphones. A
portion of this increase led to charges against inventory and supply commitments of approximately $934 million recorded in the
second quarter of fiscal 2014 primarily attributable to BlackBerry Z10 devices (the “Z10 Inventory Charge”) and $1.6 billion
recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 primarily attributable to BlackBerry 10 devices (the “Q3 2014 Inventory Charge”).
Additional complexity and uncertainty exists with forecasting related to the introduction of any new technology platform.
37
Table of Contents
The Company may be required to record long-lived asset impairment charges, which could adversely impact the
Company’s financial results
Under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, the Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment
when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
As at March 1, 2014, the Company’s long-lived assets had a carrying value of approximately $2.4 billion. The assets represent
items such as the Company’s network infrastructure, owned office buildings and certain intellectual property, among others.
The current macroeconomic environment and competitive dynamics continue to be challenging to the Company’s business and
the Company cannot be certain of the duration of these conditions and their potential impact on the Company’s ability to
generate sufficient cash flows to fully recover the current carrying value of these assets. If it is determined that sufficient future
cash flows do not exist to support the current carrying value, the Company will be required to record an impairment charge for
long-lived assets in order to adjust the value of these assets to the newly established estimated value, as was the case in the third
quarter of fiscal 2014 where the Company recorded a long-lived asset write down of approximately $2.7 billion.
The occurrence or perception of a breach of the Company’s security measures or an inappropriate disclosure of
confidential or personal information could harm its business.
The BlackBerry wireless solution frequently involves the transmission of business-critical, proprietary, confidential and
personal information of end users. Like many other companies, the Company has been in the past, and expects to be in the
future, the target of attempts by unauthorized third parties to access such information by breaching security measures that the
Company or its partners have implemented.
Attempts by outside parties to access confidential or personal information of companies or their customers have, unfortunately,
become commonplace. Unauthorized parties can attempt to breach a company’s security measures through the actions of
outside parties (e.g., hacking or malware) or employee action (e.g., error, malfeasance, or otherwise), in an attempt to obtain
access to confidential or personal information. Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees,
users, partners or customers to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to confidential or personal information.
Third party applications that are downloaded by a user on their BlackBerry smartphone could also increase the risk of a
potential unauthorized access, misuse or misdirection of confidential or personal information because some applications require
access to such information.
If the security measures implemented by the Company or its partners are breached, or perceived to be breached, or if there is an
inappropriate disclosure or misdirection of confidential or personal information, including as a result of a security breach or
virus relating to hardware or software, the Company could be exposed to litigation, potential liability and regulatory sanctions.
Even if the Company was not held liable, a security breach or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or personal information
(or the perception that such a breach has occurred) could materially damage the Company’s reputation, which is built in large
measure on the security and reliability of the BlackBerry wireless solution, and even the perception of security vulnerabilities in
the Company’s products or services could lead some customers, particularly governmental customers, to reduce or delay future
purchases or to purchase competitive products or services.
In addition, the Company may be required to invest additional resources or change its products and services to protect itself
against damage caused by these actual or perceived disruptions or security breaches in the future and these actions may have a
detrimental impact, for example, on cost, the user experience or compatibility with third party products and services. Since the
techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are
not recognized until launched against a target, or may not be identified until a later time, the Company may not be able to
anticipate these techniques, to implement adequate preventative measures or to remedy them in a timely manner. The risk that
these types of events could seriously harm the Company’s business may increase as the Company expands the number of web-
based products and services that it offers, increases the number of countries where the Company operates, and expands its
ecosystem to offer third party products and services in conjunction with its own.
The Company’s business depends on a strong brand, and failing to maintain and enhance its brand would hurt the
Company's ability to expand its base of users, customers and partners.
The brand identity that the Company developed significantly contributed to the success of its business. Maintaining and
enhancing the “BlackBerry” brand is critical to expanding the Company’s base of users, customers and partners. The Company
believes that the importance of brand recognition will increase due to the relatively low barriers to entry in the wireless
communications industry. On January 30, 2013, the Company announced its intention to adopt the name of its revolutionary
38
Table of Contents
BlackBerry product line to coincide with the launch of its new platform, BlackBerry 10. The move consolidated the Company’s
brand into a single cohesive global presence. The new corporate name was approved by shareholders at the Company’s Annual
General and Special Meeting in July 2013. The Company also made significant investments in marketing in cooperation with
its U.S. carrier partners and its other global customers to promote and support the launch of BlackBerry 10. However, the
“BlackBerry” brand may be negatively impacted by a number of factors, including service outages, product malfunctions,
product performance not meeting expectations, a user experience which does not compare to that of the Company’s
competitors, data privacy and security issues, and perceptions of the value and future success of the Company’s products and
services. In addition, the Company believes that uncertainty relating to the Company's recently completed strategic review
process and a loss of market share, particularly in the United States, have adversely affected the perception of its brand and
efforts to implement and realize the benefits of the Company's strategic initiatives may not be successful in maintaining and
enhancing the brand. If the Company fails to maintain and enhance the “BlackBerry” brand, or if the Company incurs
excessive expenses in this effort, the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition will be materially and
adversely affected.
Network disruptions or other business interruptions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business and harm its reputation.
The BlackBerry service is provided through a combination of the Company’s network operations and the wireless networks of
its carrier partners. The Company’s operations rely on a significant degree on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of
complex technology systems and networks, which are in some cases integrated with those of third parties. The Company’s
networks and technology systems are potentially vulnerable to damage or interruption from a variety of sources, physical or
logical, including damage or interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications or computer systems failure,
cyber attack, human error, terrorist acts, war, and the threatened or actual suspension of BlackBerry service at the request of a
government for alleged noncompliance with local laws or other events. The increased number of third party applications on the
Company’s network may also enhance the risk of network disruption and cyber attack risk for the Company. There may also be
system or network interruptions if new or upgraded systems are defective or not installed properly. The Company continues to
work to develop, implement and test its Business Continuity Plan and there can be no assurance that the measures taken by the
Company to date, or measures implemented by the Company in connection with its Business Continuity Plan, to manage risks
related to network disruptions or other business interruptions will be adequate or that the redundancies built into the Company’s
systems and network operations will work as planned in the event of a disaster.
As the Company’s requirements to handle more data traffic driven by new service offerings increases, additional
strain has been placed on the technology systems and networks, thereby increasing the relative risk of a network
disruption or other business interruption.
The Company has experienced network events in the past, and any future outage in a network or system or other unanticipated
problem that leads to an interruption or disruption of the BlackBerry service, could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition, and could adversely affect the Company’s longstanding
reputation for reliability, thereby resulting in end users purchasing products offered by its competitors if reliability is no longer
considered a differentiating factor of the BlackBerry wireless solution. As the Company moves to support more applications or
services, the expense to establish and maintain a resilient and secure network services capability may significantly increase.
In addition, poor performance in or any additional interruptions of the services that the Company delivers to its customers could
delay market acceptance of its products and services and expose it to costs or potential liabilities, including under service level
agreements (“SLAs”) with certain customers. The SLAs specify the events constituting “down time” and the actions that the
Company will take to rectify or respond to such down time, including in certain cases, the payment of financial penalties. For
example, as a result of the service interruption that occurred in October 2011, the Company lost service revenue and was
required to pay penalties in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and continues to face class action suits.
The Company is subject to risks inherent in foreign operations.
Sales outside North America represented approximately 73% of the Company’s revenue in fiscal 2014, which was comparable
with fiscal 2013. The North American market, particularly the United States, has become increasingly competitive and the
Company intends to continue to pursue international market growth opportunities, such that international sales are likely to
continue, at least in the near future, to account for a significant portion of the Company’s revenue. The Company has
committed, and intends to commit, significant resources to its international operations and sales and marketing activities. The
Company maintains offices in a number of foreign jurisdictions, and could potentially open additional offices in other
countries. The Company has limited experience conducting business in some of these jurisdictions outside of North America,
39
Table of Contents
and it may not be aware of all the factors that may affect its business in foreign jurisdictions. The Company will be subject to a
number of risks associated with its expanding international business operations and sales and marketing activities that may
increase liability, costs, lengthen sales cycles and require significant management attention. These risks include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
compliance with the laws of the United States, Canada and other countries that apply to the Company’s
international operations, including import and export legislation, lawful access and privacy laws (as discussed
further below);
compliance with existing and emerging anti-corruption laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of the
United States, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act of Canada and the UK Bribery Act;
increased reliance on third parties to establish and maintain foreign operations;
the complexities and expense of administering a business abroad;
complications in compliance with, and unexpected changes in, foreign regulatory requirements, including
requirements relating to content filtering and requests from law enforcement authorities;
trading and investment policies;
consumer protection laws that impose additional obligations on the Company or restrict the Company’s ability
to provide limited warranty protection;
instability in economic or political conditions, including inflation, recession and actual or anticipated military
conflicts, social upheaval or political uncertainty;
foreign currency fluctuations;
foreign exchange controls and cash repatriation restrictions, including those relating to Venezuela and Argentina
and certain other jurisdictions (as discussed further above);
tariffs and other trade barriers;
difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;
potential adverse tax consequences;
uncertainties of laws and enforcement relating to the protection of intellectual property or secured technology;
litigation in foreign court systems;
unauthorized copying or use of the Company’s intellectual property, including software, know-how or trade
secrets;
cultural and language differences;
difficulty in managing a geographically dispersed workforce in compliance with local laws and customs that
vary from country to country; and
other factors, depending upon the country involved.
There can be no assurance the policies and procedures implemented by the Company to address or mitigate these risks will be
successful, that Company personnel will comply with them or that the Company will not experience these factors in the future
or that they will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
See also the Risk Factor entitled “The Company’s ability to maintain or increase its liquidity, its existing cash balance, its
ability to access existing or potential alternative sources of funding, the sufficiency of its financial resources, and its ability to
service its debt, could be adversely affected by its ability to offer competitive products and services in a timely manner at
competitive prices, its ability to collect accounts receivables in jurisdictions with foreign currency controls and its access to the
capital markets.”
The Company is subject to general commercial litigation, class action and other litigation claims as part of its
operations, and it could suffer significant litigation expenses in defending these claims and could be subject to
significant damage awards or other remedies.
In the course of its business, the Company receives general commercial claims related to the conduct of its business and the
performance of its products and services, employment claims and other litigation claims, which may potentially include claims
relating to improper use of or access to personal data. For example, the Company is facing class action suits as a result of the
service interruption that occurred in October 2011. Litigation resulting from these claims could be costly and time-consuming
and could divert the attention of management and key personnel from the Company’s business operations. The complexity of
the technology involved and the inherent uncertainty of commercial, class action, employment and other litigation increases
these risks. In recognition of these considerations, the Company may enter into material settlements. If the Company is
unsuccessful in its defense of material litigation claims or is unable to settle the claims, the Company may be faced with
significant monetary damages or injunctive relief against it that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business, BlackBerry brand, results of operations and financial condition. Administrative or regulatory actions against the
Company or its employees could also have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, BlackBerry brand, results of
operations and financial condition. See also “Legal Proceedings” in this AIF.
40
Table of Contents
Risk associated with litigation claims against the Company arising from the Company’s disclosure practices,
including its practice of providing forward-looking guidance to its shareholders with respect to certain financial
metrics and updating previous guidance where circumstances warrant.
On March 29, 2012, the Company announced that it would no longer provide specific, forward-looking quantitative guidance.
However, the Company remains committed to providing a high level of disclosure and transparency and will continue to
provide commentary that highlights the trends and uncertainties that the Company anticipates. Any statements that are forward-
looking statements are intended to enable the Company’s shareholders to view the anticipated performance and prospects of the
Company from management’s perspective at the time such statements are made, and they are subject to the risks that are
inherent in all forward-looking statements, as described in this AIF under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements” and “Risk Factors”. These forward-looking statements are made by the Company in light of its experience, its
perception of historical and anticipated business trends, existing conditions in the business at the time and anticipated future
developments, including competition and new product initiatives and expected timing, as well as the Company’s current
assessments of the risk factors that affect its business and the likely success of mitigation strategies relating to such factors.
These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent risk of difficulties in forecasting the Company’s financial results
and performance for future periods, particularly over longer periods, given the ongoing transition in the Company's business
strategy and rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that
characterize the wireless communications industry. These difficulties in forecasting the Company's financial results and
performance are magnified at the present time given the uncertainties related to the Company's operational restructuring, recent
management changes and the strategic initiatives described in this AIF.
Given the dynamics of the wireless communications industry, the Company’s financial results may not follow any past trends.
In particular, the Company’s entry into new markets or changes to the Company’s technology, such as its transition to the
BlackBerry 10 platform, can increase the difficulty of forecasting financial results. Significant unanticipated sales and
marketing, R&D, IT, professional and other costs, writedowns and impairment charges may be incurred or take place in a single
quarter, which can affect results. Additionally, many of the Company’s products are, among other things, subject to long
development, new product approval and certification, and sales cycles. In addition, the Company is engaged in an industry that
is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, and has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, intense competition
from a number of companies. As a result, if expected revenues are not realized as anticipated, if new product introductions are
delayed or are not as well received by the market as anticipated, or if operating expenses are higher than expected, the
Company’s actual financial results could be materially adversely affected. These factors can make it difficult to predict the
Company’s financial results. Consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the
Company’s forward-looking statements and may not meet the expectations of analysts or investors, which can contribute to the
volatility of the market price of the Company’s common shares. Despite the Company’s cautions in each earnings release,
earnings conference call and securities filings that contains forward-looking statements that the risks relating to such statements
should be considered carefully and that shareholders should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, if results
expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements are not realized, or the Company updates its forward-looking statements
at a later time, the Company may nevertheless be subject to potential securities litigation or enforcement action. Between
October and December 2013, several purported class action lawsuits and one individual lawsuit were filed against the Company
and certain of its former officers in various jurisdictions alleging that during the period from September 27, 2012 through
September 20, 2013, the Company and certain of its officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the
Company’s financial condition and business prospects and that certain of the Company’s financial statements contain material
misstatements. The individual lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed. The purported class action claims seek unspecified damages.
Regardless of the Company’s views of the merits of this action or any similar actions that may be filed against the Company,
securities litigation is costly, time-consuming and may be unpredictable, and could divert the attention of management and key
personnel from the Company’s business operations. If the Company is unsuccessful in its defense of securities litigation claims
or is unable to settle the claims, the Company may be faced with significant monetary damages that could have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Administrative or regulatory actions
against the Company or its employees could also have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of
operations and financial condition. See also “Legal Proceedings” in this AIF.
Failure of the Company’s suppliers, subcontractors, third-party distributors and representatives to use acceptable
ethical business practices or to comply with applicable laws could negatively impact the Company’s business.
The Company expects its suppliers and subcontractors to operate in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations
regarding working conditions, labor and employment practices, environmental compliance, anti-corruption (including the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of the United States, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act of Canada and the UK
Bribery Act), and patent and trademark licensing as detailed in the Company’s Supplier Code of Conduct. However, the
Company does not directly control their labor and other business practices. If one of the Company’s suppliers or subcontractors
41
Table of Contents
violates applicable labor, anti-corruption or other laws, or implements labor or other business practices that are regarded as
unethical, or if a supplier or subcontractor fails to comply with procedures designed by the Company to adhere to existing or
proposed regulations, the shipment of finished products to the Company could be interrupted, orders could be canceled,
relationships could be terminated, the Company’s reputation could be damaged, and the Company may be subject to liability.
Any of these events could have a negative impact on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Company may infringe on the intellectual property rights of others.
The Company’s commercial success depends upon the Company not infringing intellectual property rights owned by others.
The industry in which the Company competes has many participants that own, or claim to own, intellectual property, including
participants that have been issued patents and may have filed patent applications or may obtain additional patents and
proprietary rights for technologies similar to those used by the Company in its products. Some of these patents may grant very
broad protection to the third-party owners of the patents. Patents can be issued very rapidly and there is often a great deal of
secrecy surrounding pending patents. The Company cannot determine with certainty whether any existing third-party patents or
the issuance of any new third-party patents would require the Company to alter its technologies, pay for licenses or cease
certain activities.
Third parties have asserted, and in the future may assert, intellectual property infringement claims against the Company and
against its customers and suppliers. The Company may be subject to these types of claims either directly or indirectly through
indemnities against these claims that it provides to certain customers, partners and suppliers. In addition, the Company could
be exposed to financial obligations to a third party, or to the risk of legal action that could impact the salability of the
Company’s products or services, if one of the Company’s providers of third-party applications or content or other suppliers fails
to procure necessary intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance that the Company’s attempts to negotiate favorable
intellectual property indemnities with its suppliers for infringement of third-party intellectual property rights will be successful
or that a supplier’s indemnity will cover all damages and losses suffered by the Company and its customers, partners and other
suppliers due to infringing products, or that the Company can secure a license, modification or replacement of a supplier’s
products or services with non-infringing products or services that may otherwise mitigate such damages and losses.
Many intellectual property infringement claims are brought by entities whose principal business model is to secure patent
licensing-based revenue from operating companies. As such entities do not typically generate their own products or services,
the Company cannot deter their patent infringement claims based on counterclaims that they infringe patents in the Company’s
portfolio or by entering into cross-licensing arrangements. Litigation and claims advanced in the International Trade
Commission have been and will likely continue to be necessary to determine the scope, enforceability and validity of third-
party proprietary rights or to establish the Company’s proprietary rights.
Some of the Company’s competitors have, or are affiliated with companies having, substantially greater resources than the
Company has, and these competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex intellectual property infringement litigation or
other proceedings to a greater degree and for longer periods of time than the Company can. Regardless of whether third-party
claims that the Company is infringing patents or other intellectual property rights have any merit, these claims could:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
adversely affect the Company’s relationships with its customers;
be time-consuming to evaluate and defend;
result in significant costs to defend the Company in litigation or other proceedings;
result in negative publicity for the Company;
divert management’s attention and resources;
cause product and software shipment delays or stoppages;
subject the Company to significant liabilities;
require the Company to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements;
require the Company to develop possible workaround solutions that may be costly and disruptive to implement;
and
require the Company to cease certain activities or to cease selling its products and services in certain markets.
In addition to being liable for potentially substantial damages relating to a patent or other intellectual property infringement
action against the Company or, in certain circumstances, the Company’s customers with respect to its products and services, the
Company may be prohibited from developing or commercializing certain technologies or products unless the Company obtains
a license from the holder of the patent or other intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to obtain any such license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If the Company does not obtain such a license, its
business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected and the Company could be
required to cease related business operations in some markets and restructure its business to focus on continuing operations in
other markets. See also “Legal Proceedings” in this AIF.
42
Table of Contents
The Company may not be able to obtain patents or other intellectual property protections necessary to secure its
proprietary technology and products.
The Company’s commercial success depends upon its ability to develop new or improved technologies and products, and to
successfully obtain or acquire patent or other proprietary or statutory protection for these technologies and products in Canada,
the United States and other countries. The Company seeks to patent concepts, components, protocols and other inventions that
are considered to have commercial value or that will likely yield a technological advantage. The Company owns rights to an
array of patented and patent pending technologies relating to wireless communication and embedded software in the United
States, Canada and other countries. The Company continues to devote significant resources to protecting its proprietary
technology. However, the Company may not be able to continue to develop technology that is patentable, patents may not be
issued in connection with the Company’s pending applications and allowed claims by the Company may not be sufficient to
protect its technology. Furthermore, any patents issued could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented and may not provide
proprietary protection or a competitive advantage.
A number of the Company’s competitors and other third parties have been issued patents, and may have filed patent
applications or may obtain additional patents and proprietary rights, for technologies similar to those that the Company has
made or may make in the future. Public awareness of new technologies often lags behind actual discoveries, making it difficult
or impossible to know all the relevant, third-party patent applications at any particular time. For example, patent applications
filed in the United States before November 29, 2000, and even a small number filed after that date, are maintained in secrecy by
the U.S. Patent Office until issued as patents. Even the majority of applications filed after November 29, 2000 do not become
public until 18 months after their first filing. Consequently, the Company cannot be certain that it was the first to develop the
technology covered by its pending patent applications or that it was the first to file patent applications for the technology. In
addition, the disclosure in the Company’s patent applications may not be sufficient to meet the statutory requirements for
patentability in all cases. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Company’s patent applications will result in patents
being issued.
Protection of the rights sought in published patent applications can be costly and uncertain and can involve complex legal and
factual questions. In addition, the laws of certain countries in which the Company’s products and services are sold or licensed
do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of Canada or the United States. Therefore, the breadth
of allowed claims and the scope of protection provided by the Company’s patents, and their enforceability, cannot be predicted.
Even if the Company’s patents are held to be enforceable, others may be able to design around these patents or develop
products or services similar to the Company’s products or services that do not infringe the Company’s patents.
In addition to patents, the Company relies on, among other things, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality
procedures and contractual provisions to protect its proprietary rights. While the Company enters into confidentiality and non-
disclosure agreements with its employees, consultants, contract manufacturers, customers, potential customers and others to
attempt to limit access to and distribution of proprietary and confidential information, it is possible that:
•
•
•
•
•
some or all of its confidentiality agreements will not be honored;
third parties will independently develop equivalent technology or misappropriate the Company’s technology or
designs;
disputes will arise with the Company’s strategic partners, customers or others concerning the ownership of
intellectual property;
unauthorized disclosure or use of the Company’s intellectual property, including source code, know-how or
trade secrets will occur; or
contractual provisions may not be enforceable.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in protecting its intellectual property rights.
The Company’s business relies on its strategic alliances and relationships with third-party network infrastructure
developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors.
The Company relies on wireless network infrastructure developers for access to emerging wireless data protocols. In addition,
the Company’s business is dependent on the development, deployment and maintenance by third parties of their wireless
infrastructure and on their sales of products and services that use the Company’s products. Market acceptance of the Company’s
products also depends on support from third-party software developers and the marketing efforts of value added resellers,
Internet service providers and computer manufacturers and distributors. The loss of, or inability to maintain, any of these
relationships, or the failure of such third parties to execute or effectively manage their own business plans, could result in
delays or reductions in product shipments, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of
operations and financial condition.
43
Table of Contents
The Company has designed BES to be used with Microsoft Exchange, IBM Lotus Domino and Novell GroupWise. The
functionality of BlackBerry smartphones sold to corporate customers will depend on continued growth in the number of
businesses that adopt Microsoft Exchange, IBM Lotus Domino and Novell GroupWise as their email and server solutions. If
the number of businesses that adopt these platforms fails to grow or grows more slowly than the Company currently expects, or
if Microsoft, IBM or Novell discontinue products, delay or fail to release new or enhanced products, or announce new
incompatible products or versions of existing products, the Company’s revenues from BlackBerry enterprise customers could
be materially adversely affected.
The collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of user data and personal information could give rise to
liabilities or additional costs as a result of laws, governmental regulations and carrier and other customer
requirements or differing views of personal privacy rights.
The Company transmits and stores a large volume of data, including personal information, in the course of supporting its
BlackBerry wireless solution. This information is increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in numerous jurisdictions
around the world that is intended to protect the privacy and security of personal information as well as the collection, storage,
transmission, use and disclosure of such information. In addition, a number of leading companies in the mobile
communications industry, including the Company, have agreed to privacy principles designed to prompt third-party application
developers to conspicuously post privacy policies with their applications.
The interpretation of privacy and data protection laws, and their application to the Internet and mobile communications, in a
number of jurisdictions is unclear and in a state of flux. There is a risk that these laws may be interpreted and applied in
conflicting ways from country to country and in a manner that is not consistent with the Company’s current data protection
practices. Complying with these varying international requirements could cause the Company to incur additional costs and
change the Company’s business practices. In addition, because the Company’s services are accessible worldwide, certain
foreign jurisdictions may claim that the Company is required to comply with their laws, even where the Company has no local
entity, employees, or infrastructure.
The Company could be adversely affected if legislation or regulations are expanded to require changes in its business practices,
if governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company does business interpret or implement their legislation or
regulations in ways that negatively affect its business or if end users allege that their personal information is not collected,
stored, transmitted, used or disclosed appropriately or in accordance with the Company’s end user agreements and privacy
policies or applicable privacy and data protection laws. If the Company is required to allocate significant resources to modify
its BlackBerry wireless solution or its existing security procedures for the personal information that its transmits and stores, its
business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
The Company’s network carriers or other customers, partners or members of its ecosystem may also have differing expectations
or impose particular requirements for the collection, storage, processing and transmittal of user data or personal information in
connection with the BlackBerry wireless solution. Such expectations or requirements could subject the Company to additional
costs, liabilities or negative publicity, and limit its future growth. In addition, governmental authorities may use the Company’s
products to access the personal data of individuals without Company’s involvement, for example, through so-called lawful
intercept capability of network infrastructure. Even perceptions that the Company’s products do not adequately protect users’
privacy or data collected by Company, made available to Company or stored in or through the Company’s products or that they
are being used by third parties to access personal or consumer data could impair the Company’s sales or its reputation and
brand value.
In addition, laws in various countries relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other
third parties are currently being tested by a number of claims, which include actions for invasion of privacy, libel, slander, and
other tort claims, unlawful activity, copyright and trademark infringement, and other theories based on the nature and content of
the materials searched, the ads posted, or the content generated by users. Certain jurisdictions are also testing the liability of
providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties. Any court ruling that imposes liability on
providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties could harm the Company’s business.
Certain governments are also imposing requirements for the filtering of content available to end users. These requirements vary
across varying jurisdictions and compliance with these requirements may be costly. Conversely, a failure to comply could result
in adverse publicity, a ban on the Company’s products and services as well as other regulatory sanctions.
44
Table of Contents
The Company relies on its suppliers to supply functional components and is exposed to the risks that these suppliers
will not supply components on a timely basis or of the desired quality; if the Company’s sales volumes decrease or
do not reach projected targets, it may face increased costs that could make its products less competitive.
The Company’s manufacturing activity depends on obtaining adequate supplies of functional components, such as displays,
semi-conductors, batteries, printed circuit boards, plastics, tooling equipment and memory, on a timely basis. The Company
purchases components and licenses certain software used in the manufacture and operation of its products from a variety of
sources. Some components, including custom components, come from sole source suppliers. Some components are also
becoming supply constrained, in part due to the continuing convergence of the mobile communication industry and computer
industry, and increased competition. Some of the Company’s competitors have greater name recognition, larger customer bases
and significantly greater financial, sales, distribution and other resources and may receive preferential treatment from suppliers
through allocations of scarce components or lower pricing. Due to increased demand for electronic components, electronic
component manufacturers are experiencing shortages of certain components including displays and memory components.
Certain key components such as displays and memory are also subject to significant commodity price fluctuations. From time
to time, the shortage and allocation of components by electronic manufacturers have resulted in increased costs to the Company
and delays in the Company’s suppliers filling orders, and the Company may rely on these sources to meet the Company’s
needs. Alternative sources of supply are not always available. Moreover, the Company depends on, but has limited control over,
the quality and reliability of the products supplied or licensed to the Company. If the Company cannot manufacture and supply
products due to a lack of components, or is unable to redesign products using other components in a timely manner, the
Company’s sales and operating results could be adversely affected. A supplier could also increase pricing, discontinue or
restrict supplying components or licensing software to the Company with or without penalty. If a supplier discontinued or
restricted supplying a component or licensing software, the Company’s sales and operating results could be adversely affected
by the resulting product manufacturing and delivery delays. In addition, if a component supplier failed to meet the Company’s
supplier standards, such as the Company’s product quality standards, and as a consequence some of its products were
unacceptable to the Company, the Company’s sales and operating results could be adversely affected. A supplier could also file
for bankruptcy or experience damage or interruption in its operations due to fire, earthquake, power loss, labor disruptions,
telecommunications or computer systems failure, the effects of the current economic downturn, human error, terrorist acts, war
or other events, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial
condition.
The Company generally uses rolling forecasts based on anticipated product orders to determine component requirements. Lead
times for materials and components vary significantly and depend on factors such as specific supplier requirements, contract
terms, rapid changes in technology, and current market demand for particular components. If the Company overestimates its
component requirements based on anticipated demand for its products, it may result in excess inventory, which would increase
the risk of obsolescence, and financial penalties based on minimum volume commitments, which would increase the
manufacturing costs per unit of the Company’s products. The BlackBerry 10 launch in particular required the Company to
significantly increase its component orders in order to meet the estimated anticipated demand for the new smartphones, which
resulted in the Z10 Inventory Charge and the Q3 2014 Inventory Charge. See the Risk Factor entitled: “The Company faces
substantial inventory and other asset risk, including risks related to its ability to sell its existing inventory of BlackBerry 10
products, manage its purchase obligations with its manufacturing partners and the potential for additional charges related to its
inventory, as well as risks related to its ability to mitigate inventory risk through its new partnership with Foxconn.” If the
Company underestimates component requirements, it may have inadequate inventory, which could interrupt manufacturing
operations and delay delivery of products. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Company has negotiated favorable pricing terms with many of its suppliers, some of which have volume-based pricing. In
the case of volume-based pricing arrangements, the Company may experience higher than anticipated costs if current volume-
based purchase projections are not met. Some contracts have minimum purchase commitments and the Company may incur
large financial penalties or increased production costs if these commitments are not met. The Company may also have unused
production capacity if its current volume projections are not met, increasing the Company’s production cost per unit. In
addition, some contracts require the Company to agree to a flat fee regardless of volumes, which can result in higher unit costs
than anticipated if demand is lower than anticipated. In the future, as the Company establishes new pricing terms, reduced
demand for any of its products and services could negatively impact future pricing from suppliers. Any of these outcomes may
result in the Company’s products being more costly to manufacture and less competitive, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
On December 20, 2013, the Company announced a five-year strategic partnership with Foxconn. Under this new relationship,
Foxconn will jointly develop and manufacture certain new BlackBerry devices and manage the inventory associated with those
devices. While the Company expects this partnership to improve the operating results from the devices portion of the business,
and to reduce the risk of excess inventory charges for products designed and manufactured by Foxconn, there can be no
45
Table of Contents
assurance that the Foxconn relationship will yield the financial or operational benefits described over the term of the agreement
as the Company will maintain relationships with other EMS partners and has not previously had any experience in conducting
these types of arrangements with Foxconn.
The Company may not be able to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties.
The Company licenses certain software used in its products and operations from third parties, generally on a non-exclusive
basis, and the Company uses components from suppliers that are reliant on intellectual property used by such suppliers. The
termination of any of these licenses, or the failure of these licensors or suppliers to adequately maintain, protect or update their
software or intellectual property rights, could delay the Company’s ability to ship its products while the Company seeks to
implement alternative technology offered by other sources and could require significant unplanned investments on the
Company’s part if the Company is forced to develop alternative technology internally. In addition, alternative technology may
not be available on commercially reasonable terms from other sources. The Company has not entered into source code escrow
agreements with every software supplier or third party licensor. In the future, it may be necessary or desirable to obtain other
third-party technology licenses relating to one or more of the Company’s products or relating to current or future technologies
to enhance the Company’s product offerings. The Company may not be able to obtain licensing rights to the needed technology
or components on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.
The Company may not be successful in expanding or managing its BlackBerry World applications catalogue.
BlackBerry World, the Company’s comprehensive electronic content distribution platform, is available to customers in over 170
markets globally. The continued expansion of the catalogue of applications and other content on BlackBerry World is an
important element of driving transition to BlackBerry 10 smartphones, and requires a substantial investment of internal
resources for development of the infrastructure, improvement of developer and consumer interfaces and advertising costs.
Decisions by customers to purchase the Company’s products are becoming increasingly based on the availability of top-rated
third-party software applications. The Company is dependent on third-party software developers to provide access to and
develop content, including applications, and services to enhance the user experience and maintain competitiveness and
differentiation of BlackBerry products in the marketplace. The availability and development of these applications and services
will depend, in part, on perceptions of the third-party software developers of the relative benefits of developing software for the
Company’s products rather than or in addition to those of its competitors, which may be adversely affected by further losses of
market share and perceptions regarding the ability of the BlackBerry 10 smartphones and related products to compete
successfully in the wireless communications industry. The Company may not be successful in convincing existing BlackBerry
developers to develop additional applications or new developers to develop applications for the catalogue. Some developers
who have significant relationships with the Company’s competitors may be unwilling to develop applications for BlackBerry
products without valuable incentives from the Company, or at all. In addition, if the Company develops its own software
applications and services, such development may negatively affect the decisions of third-party developers to develop, maintain,
and upgrade similar or competitive applications. The loss of, or inability to maintain these relationships may affect the
desirability of the Company’s products and, hence, the Company’s revenue from the sale of its products, particularly to
consumers. If the Company is unable to successfully expand and manage the BlackBerry World applications catalogue, the
success of the Company’s BlackBerry 10 smartphones and future products and services may be materially and adversely
affected.
An expansion of the Company’s online commercial presence may also require significant additional investment in security
measures to protect the transmission of confidential data, including payment information, and to augment protection for the
Company’s servers and network. Any failure by the Company to implement adequate measures around security of payments, or
security of confidential or personal information of the end users of the Company’s products, could result in regulatory
enforcement or potential litigation and have a detrimental impact on the BlackBerry brand and the Company’s reputation. For
example, failure by the Company to comply with applicable laws, regulations and practices imposed or supported by the
payment card industry relating to the security of payments could result in sanctions by individual card providers (including
prohibiting the Company from processing a card provider’s card), regulatory sanctions, fines or litigation under applicable
privacy laws or reputational damage. Applications may also require an interface with third parties over which the Company has
no control. If necessary third-party interfaces are not available to support the applications, the Company may lose market share,
and its business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
46
Table of Contents
The Company is subject to government laws, regulations, orders, policies and restrictions, including on the sale of
products and services that use encryption technology.
Regulatory initiatives throughout the world can also create new and unforeseen regulatory obligations on the Company, its
products and services. Government regulations applicable to the Company’s products and services may provide opportunities
for competitors or limit industry growth. For example, a change to the regulatory classification of the Company’s products and
services, such as content, taxation, and licensing requirements, could place regulatory obligations commonly reserved for
licensed telecommunications carriers or broadcasters on the Company. The impact of these potential obligations vary based on
the jurisdiction, but any such changes could impact whether the Company enters, maintains or expands its presence in a
particular market, and whether the Company must dedicate additional resources to comply with these obligations.
Various countries have enacted laws and regulations, adopted controls, license or permit requirements, and restrictions on the
export, import, and use of products or services that contain encryption technology. In addition, from time to time, governmental
agencies have proposed additional requirements for encryption technology, such as requiring the escrow and governmental
recovery of private encryption keys. Restrictions on the sale or distribution of products or services containing encryption
technology may prevent the Company from selling or distributing the BlackBerry wireless solution in certain markets or may
require the Company to make changes to the encryption technology that is embedded in its products or services to comply with
such restrictions. Government restrictions, or changes to the Company’s products or services to comply with such restrictions,
could delay or prevent the acceptance and use of the Company’s products and services. Likewise, restrictions or perceived
restrictions may adversely affect the marketing and sales resources that network carriers and distributors may dedicate to the
Company’s products and services.
Some of the Company’s competitors do not have the same level of encryption in their technology and some competitors may be
subject to less stringent controls on the export, import, and use of encryption technologies in certain markets. Also, several
countries have adopted legislation authorizing the circumvention of encryption measures in limited circumstances. These
legislative provisions could potentially be used by competitors to attempt to reverse engineer or find vulnerabilities in the
Company’s products and services. As a result, these competitors may be able to compete more effectively than the Company
can in those markets. In addition, the United States, Canada and other countries have imposed export controls that prohibit the
export of encryption technology to certain countries, entities and individuals. The Company’s failure to comply with export,
import, and use laws and regulations concerning encryption technology could subject the Company to sanctions and penalties,
including fines, and suspension or revocation of export or import privileges.
In addition, governments are increasingly imposing requirements on entities like the Company to facilitate controls over the
content that users have access to on their mobile devices. Examples include content filtering laws or laws designed to prevent a
company’s products or services from being used to infringe third party intellectual property such as copyright in artistic
performances. Also, numerous jurisdictions impose content filtering requirements to prevent access to content deemed
restricted based on the norms and laws of that particular jurisdiction. Furthermore, the Company may be required to pay
copyright levies on products and services used by consumers to copy or stream copyrighted works. Non-compliance with these
legal requirements could result in fines, imprisonment of local executives, and sanctions on the import and/or use of the
Company’s products or services.
Defects in the Company’s products and services can be difficult to detect and remedy. If defects occur, they could
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
The Company’s products and services are highly complex and sophisticated and may contain design defects, errors or security
vulnerabilities that are difficult to detect and correct. Design defects, errors or vulnerabilities may be found in products or
services after commencement of commercial shipments or provision of such services and, if discovered, the Company may not
be able to successfully correct such defects, errors or vulnerabilities in a timely manner or at all. The occurrence of defects,
errors or vulnerabilities in the Company’s products or services could result in the loss of, or delay in, customer or end user
acceptance of its products or services and may harm the Company’s reputation, and correcting such defects, errors or
vulnerabilities in its products or services could require significant expenditures by the Company, involving cost or time and
effort of Company personnel.
As the Company’s products are integrated into its customers’ networks and equipment, are used with third party applications
and are used to deliver confidential or personal information, the sale and support of these products and services may entail the
risk of liability due to product liability, warranty or other claims tied to the security of data. In addition, the failure of the
Company’s products or services to perform to end user expectations could give rise to product liability claims and warranty
claims. The consequences of any such defects, errors, vulnerabilities and claims could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
47
Table of Contents
In some cases, if design defects, errors or vulnerabilities affect a product’s safety or regulatory compliance, then such product
may need to be recalled. Depending on the nature of the defect and the number of products, the Company may be forced to
incur substantial recall costs, in addition to the costs associated with the potential loss of future orders and the damage to the
Company’s reputation. Recalls involving regulatory agencies could also result in fines and additional costs. Finally, recalls
could result in third-party litigation, including class action litigation by persons alleging common harm resulting from the
purchase of the Company’s products.
In addition, the Company outsources the majority of the manufacturing and repair of its products to third parties. The resources
devoted by these third parties to meet the Company’s manufacturing and repair requirements is not within the Company’s
control and there can be no assurance that manufacturing or repair problems will not occur in the future. See also “Risk Factors
-- The Company increasingly relies upon third parties to manufacture and repair its products and it is exposed to the risk that
these third parties may not be able to satisfy its manufacturing needs and repairs on a timely basis or to an appropriate
quality standard.”
The Company’s business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist shareholders.
Publicly-traded companies have increasingly become subject to campaigns by investors seeking to advocate certain governance
changes or corporate actions such as financial restructuring, special dividends, share repurchases or even sales of assets or the
entire company. Activist shareholders have publicly advocated for certain governance and strategic changes at the Company in
the past, and the Company could be subject to additional shareholder activity or demands in the future. Given the challenges the
Company has encountered in its business in recent years, recent changes to the Company’s governance and strategic focus may
not satisfy such shareholders who may attempt to promote or effect further changes, or acquire control over the Company.
Responding to proxy contests, media campaigns and other actions by activist shareholders would be costly and time-
consuming, disrupt the Company’s operations and would divert the attention of the Board and senior management from the
pursuit of its business strategies, particularly its ability to implement its new strategic initiatives, which could adversely affect
the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and prospects. If individuals are elected to the Board with a specific
agenda to increase short-term shareholder value, it may adversely affect or undermine the Company’s ability to effectively
implement the Company’s plans. Perceived uncertainties as to the Company’s future direction as a result of shareholder
activism could also result in the loss of potential business opportunities, and may make it more difficult to attract and retain
qualified personnel and business partners, to the detriment of the Company.
If the Company loses its foreign private issuer status under U.S. federal securities laws, it will incur additional
expenses associated with compliance with the U.S. securities laws applicable to U.S. domestic issuers and will not be
able to utilize certain benefits available to foreign private issuers.
As a foreign private issuer, as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act, the Company is currently exempt from certain of
the provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. For example, the U.S. proxy rules and the Section 16 reporting and “short
swing” profit rules do not apply to foreign private issuers. However, if the Company loses its status as a foreign private issuer,
these regulations would apply and it would also be required to commence reporting on forms required of U.S. domestic
companies, such as Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, rather than the forms currently available to the Company, such as Forms 40-F
and 6-K. Compliance with the additional disclosure and timing requirements under these securities laws would likely result in
increased expenses and would require the Company’s management to devote substantial time and resources to comply with new
regulatory requirements. Further, to the extent that the Company offers or sells its securities on an unregistered basis outside of
the United States, it would have to comply with the more restrictive Regulation S requirements that apply to U.S. domestic
companies. The Company would also no longer be able to utilize the significant benefits afforded by the U.S./Canada
multijurisdictional disclosure system, which generally permits eligible Canadian companies to use Canadian disclosure
documents to satisfy continuous reporting requirements in both Canada and the United States, and allows Canadian companies
to make offers and sales of securities to the public in the United States using a Canadian prospectus that is subject to review by
the principal Canadian regulator, thereby avoiding the costs and delays associated with duplicative and sometimes conflicting
regulatory requirements. In addition, the Company would not be able to benefit from certain exemptions available to foreign
private issuers that it has used in the past, including its ability to comply with the rules of the TSX in lieu of certain NASDAQ
listing requirements.
Government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies may provide opportunities for competitors or
limit industry growth.
The allocation of radio frequencies around the world is regulated by government bodies and there is limited spectrum available
for use in the delivery of wireless services. If there is insufficient spectrum allocated to the delivery of wireless communications
48
Table of Contents
services, the Company’s growth and financial performance could be adversely impacted. In addition, deregulation of spectrum
may allow new wireless technologies to become viable, which could offer competition to the Company’s products and services.
The Company expects this risk will become increasingly significant as the Company endeavors to enter new foreign markets.
Reduced spending by customers due to the uncertainty of economic and geopolitical conditions may negatively
affect the Company.
Many of the end users of the BlackBerry wireless solution and other Company products and services are directly affected by the
current economic and geopolitical conditions affecting the broader market. A slowdown in capital spending by end users of the
Company’s products and services, coupled with existing economic and geopolitical uncertainties globally and in the financial
services or legal markets in particular, could substantially reduce the demand for the Company’s products and services and
adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
Current and future conditions in the domestic and global economies remain uncertain, and it is difficult to estimate the level of
economic activity for the economy as a whole. It is even more difficult to estimate growth in various parts of the economy,
including the markets in which the Company participates. Because all components of the Company’s budgeting and forecasting
are dependent upon estimates of economic activity in the markets that the Company serves and demand for its products and
services, economic uncertainties make it difficult to estimate future income and expenditures.
Economic or geopolitical uncertainties may cause end users to reduce their IT budgets or reduce or cancel orders for the
Company’s products and services. For example, many end users of the BlackBerry wireless solution may not upgrade their
devices or may postpone the replacement of their devices or the purchase of their first device, or may purchase less costly
products and services offered by the Company’s competitors due to more limited financial resources or out of concern for
economic uncertainty. Network carriers may further reduce device subsidies that they offer to end users or attempt to extend the
periods of contracts that obligate end users to use a certain device. Any such developments could have a material adverse
impact on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, acts of terrorism and the outbreak of hostilities and armed conflicts within or between countries have created and
may continue to create uncertainties that may affect the global economy and could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
Acquisitions, divestitures, investments and other business initiatives may negatively affect the Company’s results of
operations.
The Company has acquired, and continues to seek out opportunities to acquire or invest in, businesses, assets, products,
services and technologies that expand, complement or are otherwise related to the Company’s business or provide opportunities
for growth. These activities create risks such as the need to integrate and manage the businesses, personnel, and products
acquired with the business, personnel and products of the Company, the challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost
savings and other benefits from acquisitions, the potential loss of key employees of the acquired business at the time of the
acquisition or upon the termination of their non-compete covenants or obligations or retention benefits, additional demands on
the Company’s management, resources, systems, procedures and controls, disruption of the Company’s ongoing business, and
diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. Such acquisitions, investments or other business
collaborations may involve significant commitments of financial and other resources of the Company. An acquisition may have
an adverse effect on the Company’s cash position if all or a portion of the purchase price is paid in cash, and common shares
issuable in an acquisition would dilute the percentage ownership of the Company’s existing shareholders. Any such activity
may not be successful in generating revenue, income or other returns to the Company, and the financial or other resources
committed to such activities will not be available to the Company for other purposes. In addition, the acquisitions may involve
unanticipated costs and liabilities, including possible litigation and new or increased regulatory exposure, which are not
covered by the indemnity or escrow provisions, if any, of the acquisition agreement.
As business circumstances dictate, the Company may also decide to divest itself of assets or businesses. The Company has
only limited experience with sales of assets or businesses and may not be successful in identifying or managing the risks
involved in any divestiture, including its ability to obtain a reasonable purchase price for the assets, potential liabilities that may
continue to apply to the Company following the divestiture, potential tax implications, employee issues or other matters. The
Company’s inability to address these risks could adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial
condition.
As part of the ongoing CORE program, the Company announced on March 21, 2014 that it had entered into an agreement to
divest the majority of its real estate holdings in Canada. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will sell more than 3
49
Table of Contents
million square feet of space, as well as vacant lands. BlackBerry will also lease back a portion of the space for its continuing
operations. The transaction is subject to certain conditions, and the transaction may not be completed on the negotiated terms
or at all.
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies.
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk as a result of transactions in currencies other than its U.S. dollar functional
currency. The majority of the Company’s revenue and purchases of raw materials are denominated in U.S. dollars. However,
some revenue, a substantial portion of operating costs, including salaries and manufacturing overhead, as well as capital
expenditures, are incurred in other currencies, primarily Canadian dollars, Euros and British Pounds. If the Canadian dollar
appreciates relative to the U.S. dollar, the Company’s Canadian dollar denominated expenses will increase when converted to
U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. If the Euro depreciates relative to the U.S. dollar, the Company’s Euro
denominated revenues will decrease when translated to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Foreign exchange rate
fluctuations may materially affect the Company’s results of operations in future periods. For more details, please refer to the
discussion of foreign exchange and income taxes in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014.
The Company is subject to regulation and certification risks that could negatively affect its business, and is also
subject to allegations of possible health or other risks relating to the use or misuse of the Company’s products, or
lawsuits and publicity related to such allegations.
The Company must comply with a variety of laws, standards and other requirements governing, among other things, health and
safety, hazardous materials usage, packaging and environmental matters, and its products must obtain regulatory approvals and
satisfy other regulatory concerns in the various jurisdictions in which they are manufactured or sold. For example, the
Company’s products must be approved by the FCC before they can be used in commercial quantities in the United States. The
FCC requires that access devices meet various standards, including safety standards with respect to human exposure to
electromagnetic radiation and basic signal leakage. Regulatory requirements in Canada, Europe, Asia and other jurisdictions
must also be met. Although the Company’s products and solutions are designed to meet relevant safety standards and
recommendations globally, when used as directed, any perceived risk of adverse health effects of wireless communication
devices could materially adversely affect the Company through a reduction in sales. The failure to comply with regulatory
requirements can subject the Company to regulatory and/or civil liability, additional costs (including fines) and reputational
harm, and in severe cases prevent it from selling its products in certain jurisdictions.
As a result of varying and developing regulatory requirements throughout the world, the Company faces increasingly complex
procurement and design challenges, which, among other things, require the Company to incur additional costs identifying
suppliers and contract manufacturers who can provide, and otherwise obtain, compliant materials, parts and end products and to
re-design its products so that the products comply with the many requirements applicable to them. There can be no assurance
that the costs of complying with and the liabilities arising from current and future health and safety, environmental (including
climate change regulation) and other laws, standards and regulatory requirements (including legislation relating to certain
minerals that are used in the wireless communications industry) will not adversely affect the Company’s business, results of
operations or financial condition.
In addition to complying with regulatory requirements, product manufacturers must obtain certification from the networks upon
which their products operate. Failure to maintain regulatory approvals or network certifications for the Company’s current
products or a failure to obtain required regulatory approvals or network certifications for any new products on a timely basis
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
There has also been public speculation about possible health risks to individuals from exposure to electromagnetic fields or
radio frequency energy from the use of mobile devices. Government agencies, international health organizations, industry
associations and other scientific bodies continue to conduct research on the topic, and there can be no assurance that future
studies, irrespective of their scientific basis, will not suggest a link between electromagnetic fields from mobile devices and
adverse health effects. Mobile device manufacturers and cellular services providers have been named in lawsuits alleging that
the use of mobile devices poses a risk to human health and that radio emissions have caused or contributed to the development
of brain tumors. Other users of mobile devices with multimedia functions, such as MP3 players, have claimed that the use of
such products has contributed to or resulted in hearing loss or other adverse health effects. In addition, users of the Company’s
products who disregard the Company’s warnings about using the products while operating a motor vehicle or who use after-
market accessories, such as batteries, that are not subject to the Company’s quality control procedures may also be at risk of
bodily harm. The perception of risk to human health or other risks could adversely affect the demand for the Company’s
50
Table of Contents
products and allegations of risks relating to the Company’s products could result in litigation, which could distract management
or result in liabilities for the Company, regardless of the merit of such claims.
The Company’s worldwide operations subject it to income, indirect and other taxes in many jurisdictions, and the
Company must exercise significant judgment in order to estimate its worldwide financial provision for income and
other taxes. There can be no assurance that the Company’s historical provisions and accruals for income and other
taxes will be adequate.
The Company is subject to income, indirect (such as sales tax, sales and use tax and value-added tax) and other taxes in Canada
and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining its worldwide liability for income, indirect
and other taxes, as well as potential penalties and interest. In the ordinary course of the Company’s business, there are many
transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Although the Company believes that its tax
estimates are reasonable, there can be no assurance that the final determination of any tax audits will not be materially different
from that which is reflected in historical income, indirect and other tax provisions and accruals. Should additional taxes or
penalties and interest be assessed as a result of an audit, litigation or changes in tax laws, there could be a material adverse
effect on the Company’s current and future results and financial condition. In addition, there is a risk of recoverability of future
deferred tax assets.
The Company’s future effective tax rate will depend on the relative profitability of the Company’s domestic and foreign
operations, the statutory tax rates and taxation laws of the related tax jurisdictions, the tax treaties between the countries in
which the Company operates, the timing of the release, if any, of the valuation allowance, and the relative proportion of
research and development incentives to the Company’s profitability.
A significant portion of the Company’s assets are held in cash, cash equivalents, short-term or long-term
investments, all of which are subject to market and credit risk.
The Company had total cash, cash equivalents and investments of $2.7 billion as at March 1, 2014, compared to $2.9 billion as
at March 2, 2013, primarily as a result of the Company's net loss and net changes in working capital, partially offset by
proceeds from the issuance of the Debentures. Cash equivalents, short term and other investments are invested primarily in debt
securities of varying maturities. Consequently, the Company is exposed to interest rate risk and its results of operations may be
adversely affected by changes in interest rates. The fair value of short term and other investments, as well as the investment
income derived from the investment portfolio, will fluctuate with changes in prevailing interest rates.
Additionally, the Company is exposed to market and credit risk on its investment portfolio. While the Company’s investment
policies include investing in liquid, investment-grade securities and limiting investments in any single issuer, there can be no
assurance that such investment policies will reduce or eliminate market or credit risks. See “Market Risk of Financial
Instruments” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year
ended March 1, 2014 for a discussion of credit risk related to the Company's investment portfolio.
Copyright levies in numerous countries for the sale of products may negatively impact the Company’s business.
The Company faces the possibility of copyright levies from collecting societies in European and other countries for the sale of
products such as BlackBerry smartphones and tablets that might be used for the private copying of copyright protected works.
The collecting societies argue that copyright levies should apply to such products because they include audio/video recording
functionality, such as an MP3 player or storage capability, despite the fact that such products are not primarily intended to act as
a recording device. If these levies are imposed, the Company’s financial results may be negatively impacted. Furthermore, the
Company may be required to pay copyright levies on products and services used by consumers to copy or stream copyrighted
works. Non-compliance with these legal requirements could result in fines, imprisonment of local executives, and sanctions on
the import and/or use of the Company’s products or services.
There are costs and other burdens associated with recently adopted regulations regarding conflict minerals.
In fiscal 2013, the SEC adopted new disclosure requirements implementing Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 for manufacturers of products containing certain minerals that are mined from
the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. These so-called “conflict minerals” are commonly found in metals
used in the manufacture of certain of the Company’s products. The implementation of these new regulations, which require
initial conflicts minerals disclosure from public companies in the United States on or before May 31, 2014, may limit the
51
Table of Contents
sourcing and availability, or may increase the costs, of some of the metals used in the manufacture of the Company’s products.
The regulations may also reduce the number of suppliers who provide conflict-free metals, and may affect the Company’s
ability to obtain products in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Also, since the Company’s supply chain is complex,
the Company may face reputational challenges if the Company is unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all metals used in
the Company’s products through the due diligence procedures that the Company implements.
The market price of the Company’s common shares is volatile.
The market price of the Company’s outstanding common shares has been and continues to be volatile, due in part to uncertainty
relating to the Company's recently completed strategic review process and the Company's ability to implement and realize the
benefits of its ongoing strategic initiatives. A variety of events, including news announcements by the Company or its
competitors, trading volume, general market trends for technology companies and other factors, could result in wide
fluctuations in the market price for its common shares. The Company’s share price may also be affected by factors such as the
performance of other technology companies, increasing market share of such companies, announcements by, or results of, the
Company’s competitors, results of existing or potential litigation, updates to forward-looking financial guidance,
announcements regarding new products and services and market rumors.
The Company’s financial results are difficult to forecast and such results may not meet the expectations of analysts or investors,
which would contribute to the volatility of the market price of the Company’s common shares. The Company’s financial results
may not follow any past trends. In particular, the Company’s entry into new markets and its introduction of new products may
increase the difficulty of forecasting financial results and performance. The Company’s sales may also be impacted by current
economic factors which more significantly impact other industry sectors, such as the financial, government and legal services
sectors and increased adoption in those sectors of products of the Company’s competitors. These sectors have represented the
Company’s largest end user concentration to date.
The Company’s operating expenses are based on anticipated revenue levels, are relatively fixed in the short term to medium
term and are incurred throughout the quarter; thus, fluctuations in operating profit are likely. Significant unanticipated sales and
marketing, R&D, IT, professional and other costs may be incurred in a single quarter which will affect results. Additionally,
many of the Company’s products are subject to long sales cycles. As a result, if expected revenues are not realized as
anticipated, or if operating expenses are higher than expected, the Company’s financial results and performance could be
materially adversely affected. These factors can make it difficult to predict the Company’s financial results and performance.
Difficulties forecasting financial results and performance over longer periods increase significantly given the ongoing transition
in the Company's business strategy, rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short
product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry. These difficulties in forecasting the Company's
financial results and performance are magnified at the present time given the uncertainties related to the Company's operational
restructuring, recent management changes and the strategic initiatives described in this AIF.
Future issuances of common shares by the Company, including upon any conversion of the Debentures, will be
dilutive to existing shareholders.
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of voting common shares, an unlimited number of non-voting Class A
common shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares issuable in series on terms and conditions established by the
Board, generally without the approval of shareholders. Existing shareholders have no pre-emptive rights in connection with
such further issues. During fiscal 2014, the Company issued $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of Debentures, which
may be converted at the holders’ option for up to 125,000,000 common shares (subject to adjustment in certain circumstances).
If the Debentures were converted in full as at March 1, 2014, the common shares issued would represent approximately 19.2%
of the Company’s then outstanding common shares. Subject to TSX and NASDAQ rules requiring shareholder approval, the
Company may make future acquisitions or enter into financings or other transactions involving the issuance of common shares
or securities convertible into common shares, which may be dilutive to existing shareholders. Sales or issuances of substantial
numbers of common shares, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market pricing for
the Company's common shares.
52
Table of Contents
There could be adverse tax consequence for the Company’s shareholders in the United States if the Company is or
was a passive foreign investment company.
Under U.S. federal income tax laws, if a company is, or for any past period was, a passive foreign investment company
(“PFIC”), there could be adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. shareholders even if the Company is no longer a
PFIC. The determination of whether the Company is a PFIC is a factual determination made annually based on various facts
and circumstances and thus is subject to change, and the principles and methodology used in determining whether a company is
a PFIC are subject to interpretation. While the Company does not believe that it is currently or has been a PFIC, there can be no
assurance that the Company was not a PFIC in the past and will not be a PFIC in the future. U.S. shareholders are urged to
consult their tax advisors concerning U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding the Company’s common shares if the
Company is or has been considered a PFIC.
The Company’s charter documents enable its directors to issue preferred shares which may prevent a takeover by a
third party.
The Company’s authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares, an unlimited number of class A
common shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares, issuable in one or more series. The Board has the authority to
issue preferred shares and determine the price, designation, rights, preferences, privileges, restrictions and conditions, including
dividend rights, of these shares without any further vote or action by shareholders. The rights of the holders of common shares
will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of holders of any preferred shares that may be issued in the
future. Subject to the Company's compliance with applicable securities law requirements, the Company’s ability to issue
preferred shares could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting shares,
the effect of which may be to deprive the Company’s shareholders of a control premium that might otherwise be realized in
connection with an acquisition of the Company.
DIVIDEND POLICY AND RECORD
The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common shares during the last three fiscal years. The Company will
consider paying dividends on its common shares in the future when circumstances permit, having regard to, among other
things, the Company’s earnings, cash flows and financial requirements, as well as relevant legal and business considerations.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
The Company’s authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of voting common shares without par value, an
unlimited number of non-voting, redeemable, retractable class A common shares without par value, and an unlimited number of
non-voting, cumulative, redeemable, retractable preferred shares without par value, issuable in series. Only common shares are
issued and outstanding.
Common Shares
Each common share is entitled to one vote at meetings of the shareholders and to receive dividends if, as and when declared by
the Board. Dividends which the Board determine to declare and pay shall be declared and paid in equal amounts per share on
the common shares and class A common shares at the time outstanding without preference or distinction. Subject to the rights
of holders of shares of any class of share ranking prior to the class A common shares and common shares, holders of class A
common shares and common shares are entitled to receive the Company’s remaining assets ratably on a per share basis without
preference or distinction in the event that it is liquidated, dissolved or wound-up.
Class A Common Shares
The holders of class A common shares are not entitled to receive notice of, or attend or vote at, any meeting of the Company’s
shareholders, except as provided by applicable law. Each such holder is entitled to receive notice of, and to attend, any
meetings of shareholders called for the purpose of authorizing the dissolution or the sale, lease or exchange of all or
substantially all of the Company’s property other than in the ordinary course of business and, at any such meeting, shall be
entitled to one vote in respect of each class A common share on any resolution to approve such dissolution, sale, lease or
exchange. Dividends are to be declared and paid in equal amounts per share on all the class A common shares and the common
shares without preference or distinction. Subject to the rights of holders of any class of share ranking prior to the class A
common shares and common shares, in the event that the Company is liquidated, dissolved or wound-up, holders of class A
common shares and common shares are entitled to receive the remaining assets ratably on a per share basis without preference
or distinction.
53
Table of Contents
The Company authorized for issuance the class A common shares when the Company was a private company to permit
employees to participate in equity ownership. Class A common shares previously issued by the Company to such employees
were converted on a one-for-one basis into common shares in December 1996. At this time, the Company has no plans to issue
further class A common shares.
Preferred Shares
The holders of preferred shares are not entitled to receive notice of, or to attend or vote at, any meeting of the Company’s
shareholders, except as provided by applicable law. Preferred shares may be issued in one or more series and, with respect to
the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets in the event that the Company is liquidated, dissolved or wound-up,
rank prior to the common shares and the class A common shares. The Board has the authority to issue series of preferred shares
and determine the price, number, designation, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions, including dividend rights, of each
series without any further vote or action by shareholders. The holders of preferred shares do not have pre-emptive rights to
subscribe to any issue of the Company’s securities. At this time there are no preferred shares outstanding and the Company has
no plans to issue any preferred shares.
Convertible Debentures
The following is a summary of the material attributes and characteristics of the Debentures. This summary does not purport to be
complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the terms of the Indenture (as defined below). Reference is made to the
Indenture, which has been filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and with the SEC at www.sec.gov, for complete descriptions of
the Debentures.
General
The Debentures are direct, unsecured debt obligations of the Company and are issued under an indenture (the “Trust Indenture”)
dated as of November 13, 2013 between the Company, as issuer, BlackBerry Corporation, BlackBerry UK Limited, BlackBerry
Finance, LLC and BlackBerry Singapore Pte. Limited, as guarantors (collectively, the “Guarantors”) and Computershare Trust
Company of Canada, as trustee (the “Trustee”), as supplemented by a supplemental indenture dated as of December 12, 2013
between the same parties (the “Supplemental Indenture”, and together with the Trust Indenture, the “Indenture”). The Debentures
are limited in the aggregate principal amount of $1,250,000,000. $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Debentures were
issued on November 13, 2013, with an additional $250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Debentures being issued on
January 16, 2014, upon the exercise of the additional purchase option granted to Fairfax. See “General Development of the Business
- Fiscal 2014”. The Debentures have been issued in book entry form as global debentures, in denominations of $1,000 and integral
multiples thereof.
The Debentures have a maturity date of November 13, 2020 (the “Maturity Date”), subject to the prior conversion, redemption
or payment thereof as provided by the Indenture.
Each of the Guarantors has separately guaranteed the payment of principal premium (if any) and interest and other amounts due
under the Debentures, and the performance of all other obligations of the Company under the Indenture (the “Guarantees”). Other
significant subsidiaries of the Company may be required to provide such Guarantees where they satisfy certain financial tests.
Interest
The Debentures bear interest at a rate of 6% per annum, payable in equal quarterly instalments in arrears on the last day of February,
May, August and November of each year. If an Event of Default (as defined below) has occurred and is continuing, the Debentures
will bear interest at a rate of 10% per annum during the period of the default.
Subordination
The Debentures rank pari passu with one another, in accordance with their tenor without discrimination, preference or priority
and, subject to statutory preferred exceptions, shall rank equally with all other present and future unsubordinated unsecured
Indebtedness (as defined below) of the Company, other than the Specified Senior Indebtedness (as defined below) of the Company
and the Guarantors. No payments shall be made on account of the Debentures during any default of payment when due of any
principal, interest or other amount owing with respect to Specified Senior Indebtedness, unless such Specified Senior Indebtedness
shall first have been paid in full or provided for. The Trustee, on behalf of the holders of Debentures (the “Holders”), may from
time to time enter into subordination agreements with Senior Creditors (as defined below) to reflect the relative priorities of the
Holders and such Senior Creditors.
Conversion Privilege
Each Holder shall have the right at its option to convert each $1,000 principal amount of its Debentures into common shares at
any time prior to the third business day prior to the Maturity Date. Common shares will be issued based on a conversion price of
54
Table of Contents
$10.00 principal amount of Debentures per share (the “Conversion Price”), subject to adjustment in the event that the Company:
(i) pays a dividend or distribution on all or substantially all of its outstanding common shares; (ii) subdivides its outstanding
common shares into a greater number of shares or combines its outstanding common shares into a smaller number of shares;
(iii) fixes a record date for the issue of rights, options or warrants to all or substantially all holders of its outstanding common
shares; (iv) pays a dividend or other distribution to all or substantially all holders of its common shares consisting of evidences
of indebtedness or other assets of the Company, including securities; (v) distributes to all holders of its common shares a payment
exclusively of cash (other than ordinary course dividends or payments on liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company);
(vi) issues common shares or securities convertible into such shares pursuant to certain non-public offerings for consideration less
than 95% of the then-current market price of the common shares; or (vii) takes any action affecting the common shares that would
materially affect the conversion rights of Holders. Adjustments shall also result from (i) any rights or warrants that may be issued
or distributed pursuant to any shareholder rights plan; or (ii) the expiry of any issuer bid made by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries whereby consideration in excess of the then-current closing price per common share is paid to tendering shareholders.
Redemption Right
The Debentures will not be redeemable prior to November 13, 2016. On or after November 13, 2016, but prior to November 13,
2017, the Debentures will be redeemable at the Company’s sole option, on not more than 60 days’ and not less than 40 days’ prior
written notice, in whole or in part, at a price equal to 104% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The
percentage of principal amount at which the Debentures may be redeemed will decrease by 1% for each successive one year period
thereafter to the Maturity Date.
Change of Control
If a change of control of the Company occurs involving: (i) the acquisition by any person or groups of persons acting jointly or
in concert, directly or indirectly, in a single transaction or a series of related transactions, of voting control or direction over more
than 35% of the then-outstanding common shares; (ii) the acquisition by any person (other than the Company or any of the
Guarantors) or one or more members of a group of persons acting jointly or in concert (other than a group consisting solely of
two or more of the Company and any of the Guarantors), directly or indirectly, in a single transaction or a series of related
transactions, of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; or (iii) the completion
of a merger, amalgamation, arrangement or similar transaction which results in holders of the Company’s common shares
immediately prior to the completion of the transaction holding less than 50% of the then outstanding common shares of the resulting
entity after the completion of the transaction (a “Change of Control”), the Company is required to make an offer (a “Repayment
Offer”) to purchase all or, at the option of the Holders, a portion (in integral multiples of $1,000) of the principal amount of the
Debentures held by such Holders, at a price equal to 115% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, to but excluding the Change of Control Repurchase Date (the “Change of Control Repurchase Price”). The Company is not
required to make that Repayment Offer to Fairfax or its affiliates, or any of their joint actors, if they caused such a Change of
Control. Any Debentures so repurchased will be cancelled and may not be reissued or resold.
Certain Covenants
The Company is bound by certain covenants under the Indenture. Positive covenants include: (i) payment of the Trustee’s
remuneration; (ii) maintenance of corporate existence and books of account; and (iii) payment of principal, premium (if any) and
interest on the Debentures when due and payable. Reporting covenants will include: (i) provision of an annual compliance certificate
regarding compliance with the terms of the Indenture and confirming that no Events of Default have occurred under the Indenture;
(ii) provision of notice of an Event of Default or any event which, with the passing of time or giving of notice, would constitute
an Event of Default; and (iii) provision of public disclosure documents to the Trustee or Holders in certain circumstances. Subject
to customary exceptions, negative covenants include: (i) no liens on assets of the Company or its Subsidiaries, except Permitted
Liens (as defined in the Indenture, which include customary liens arising by operation of law, liens securing Specified Senior
Indebtedness, Purchase Money Security Interests (as defined below) securing permitted Indebtedness, liens on real property
incurred in connection with a sale and leaseback of permitted Indebtedness, and any other lien not prohibited by the Company’s
existing asset-backed lending facility, subject to compliance with restrictions on incurring Indebtedness); (ii) a limitation on
amalgamations and mergers except in compliance with customary successor entity provisions; and (iii) a limitation on dividends,
dividend increases and speculative hedging transactions.
The Company and its subsidiaries are restricted, without consent of Holders of 66-2/3% of the outstanding Debentures, from
incurring any indebtedness or permitting any indebtedness to be outstanding, other than:
(a)
(b)
(c)
the Debentures and the Guarantees;
Specified Senior Indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding not to exceed
$550,000,000;
Indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding not to exceed $450,000,000,
comprised of:
55
Table of Contents
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
Indebtedness secured by a Purchase Money Security Interest including Capital Leases (as defined
below);
Indebtedness incurred in connection with a sale and leaseback of real property;
Indebtedness incurred under a securitization or factoring of receivables;
Indebtedness of any subsidiary acquired by the Company or its subsidiaries that existed prior to such
acquisition and not incurred in contemplation of such acquisition;
Indebtedness incurred to finance insurance premiums;
other Indebtedness (other than Specified Senior Indebtedness) provided that such Indebtedness shall
be unsecured; or
(vii)
Indebtedness incurred to refinance any Indebtedness referred to in clauses (i) through (iv) above.
Events of Default
The Indenture provides for such events of default as are customary for indebtedness of this type (each, an “Event of Default”)
including: (i) a default in payment of any principal amount, purchase price or any Change of Control Repurchase Price when due;
(ii) a default in payment of interest on any Debentures when due and the continuance of such default for 10 days; (iii) a default
in maintaining the Company’s reporting issuer status or the listing of the common shares, or in providing an opinion in respect of
new Guarantors, and the continuance of such default for five business days; (iv) a default in the delivery of common shares or
cash due upon conversion of Debentures, and the continuance of such default for three business days; (v) a default by the Company
or any Guarantor in performing or observing any of the other covenants, agreements or material obligations of the Company or
the Guarantor under the Indenture, and the continuance of such default for 30 days after written notice to the Company by the
Trustee or by the holders of not less than 25% in principal amount of outstanding Debentures requiring the same to be remedied;
(vi) the failure to make a Repayment Offer following the occurrence of a Change of Control; (vii) certain events of bankruptcy
or insolvency with respect to the Company or any Guarantor; (viii) any of the Guarantees being held in any judicial proceeding
to be unenforceable or invalid or ceasing for any reason to be in full force and effect or any Guarantor, or any person acting on
behalf of a Guarantor, denying or disaffirming its obligations under its Guarantee; (ix) (A) if the Company or any Guarantor is in
default (as principal or as guarantor or other surety) in the payment of any principal of or premium or make-whole amount on any
Indebtedness that is outstanding in an aggregate principal amount of more than $50,000,000 (or its equivalent in the relevant
currency of payment) beyond any period of grace provided with respect thereto, or (B) if the Company or any Guarantor is in
default in the performance of or compliance with any term of any evidence of any Indebtedness in an aggregate outstanding
principal amount of more than $50,000,000 (or its equivalent in the relevant currency of payment) or of any mortgage, indenture
or other agreement relating thereto or any other condition exists, and in each case as a consequence of such default or condition
such Indebtedness has become or has been declared due and payable before its stated maturity or before its regularly schedule
dates of payment, or (C) as a consequence of the occurrence or continuation of any event or condition (other than (a) the passage
of time or (b) the right of the holder of Indebtedness to convert such Indebtedness into equity interests or (c) any mandatory
prepayment provisions in an agreement governing Indebtedness unless such provisions also require the permanent prepayment of
all Indebtedness then outstanding and, if applicable, the permanent cancellation of all other amounts available to be borrowed
under such agreement), the Company or any Guarantor has become obligated to purchase or repay Indebtedness (including any
Specified Senior Indebtedness but excluding the Debentures) before its regular maturity or before its regularly scheduled dates of
payment in an aggregate outstanding principal amount of more than $50,000,000 (or its equivalent in the relevant currency of
payment); and (x) if the Company any of its subsidiaries fails to pay final judgments aggregating in excess of an amount greater
than $50,000,000 in cash (net of any amounts for which an insurance company is liable) rendered against the Company or any of
its subsidiaries by a court of competent jurisdiction, which judgments are not paid, discharged or stayed for a period of 30 days
after such judgments become final and non-appealable.
If an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing (other than an Event of Default due to an event of bankruptcy or insolvency),
the Trustee may, in its discretion, and shall, at the written request of holders of not less than 25% in principal amount of the
Debentures then outstanding, declare the principal of (and premium, if any), together with accrued interest on all outstanding
Debentures to be immediately due and payable. If an Event of Default due to an event of bankruptcy or insolvency occurs, the
principal of (and premium, if any), together with accrued interest on all outstanding Debentures will immediately become due and
payable without any action on the part of the Debenture Trustee or any holders of Debentures. The holders of more than 66-2/3%
of the principal amount of outstanding Debentures may, on behalf of the holders of all outstanding Debentures, waive an Event
of Default in the manner set forth below under “Modification or Waiver”.
Modification or Waiver
The rights of the Holders may be modified or waived in accordance with the terms of the Indenture. For that purpose, among
others, the Indenture contains certain provisions which will make binding on all Holders resolutions passed at meetings of the
Holders (which may be called by the Company or the Trustee upon not less than 21 days’ notice) by votes cast thereat by holders
56
Table of Contents
of not less than 66-2/3% including waivers for certain events of default, or in the case of Extraordinary Resolutions (as defined
in the Indenture) and waivers of certain defaults in payment or delivery of shares not less than 90%, of the aggregate principal
amount of the Debentures present at the meeting or represented by proxy, provided that a quorum for all meetings of holders of
Debentures will be at least 25% of the principal amount of outstanding Debentures represented in person or by proxy, or rendered
by instruments in writing signed by the holders of not less than 66-2/3%, or in the case of Extraordinary Resolutions not less than
90%, of the aggregate principal amount of the Debentures then outstanding. In addition, without the approval of Holders by
Extraordinary Resolution, the Indenture may not be amended to: (i) alter the manner of calculation of or rate of accrual of interest
on the Debentures or change the time of payment; (ii) make the Debentures convertible into securities other than common shares;
(iii) change the Maturity Date or any instalment of interest on the Debentures; (iv) reduce the principal amount or Change of
Control Repurchase Price with respect to the Debentures; (v) make any change that adversely affects the rights of holders to require
the Company to purchase the Debentures at the option of Holders; (vi) impair the right to institute suit for the enforcement of
payments or the conversion of the Debentures; (vii) change the currency of payment of principal of, or interest on, the Debentures;
(viii) except as contemplated by the Indenture, change the Conversion Price or otherwise adversely affect the Holders’ conversion
rights; (ix) release any of the Guarantors from any of their obligations under a Guarantee provided for in the Indenture, except in
accordance with the Indenture; or (x) change the provisions in the Indenture that relate to modifying or amending the Indenture.
Purchase of Debentures
The Company may at any time and from time to time purchase all or any of the Debentures in the market or by tender or by private
contract, at any price, subject to compliance with applicable securities laws. Debentures so purchased by the Company shall be
submitted to the Trustee for cancellation. If an Event of Default has occurred as is continuing as a result of (i) a default in payment
of any principal amount or any purchase price, or Change of Control Repurchase Price, when the same becomes due and payable,
or (ii) a default in payment of interest on any Debentures when due and payable and the continuance of such default for ten (10)
days, the Company will not have the right to purchase Debentures. In the case of any other Event of Default, purchases of Debentures
other than by private contract would be permitted.
Stock Exchange Listing
The Company has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to list the Debentures on a recognized stock exchange. There
can be no assurance that a listing will be obtained for the Debentures, or if obtained, that a liquid market for the Debentures will
develop.
Defined Terms
In the foregoing summary, the following terms have the meanings set forth below:
“Capital Lease” means, with respect to any Person (as defined in the Indenture), any lease of any property (whether real, personal
or mixed) by such Person as lessee that, in accordance with U.S. GAAP (as in effect on the date of the Trust Indenture), is required
to be classified and accounted for as a capital lease on a balance sheet of such Person;
“Indebtedness” means, with respect to a person, and without duplication:
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
indebtedness of such person for monies borrowed or raised, including any indebtedness represented by a note,
bond, debenture or other similar instrument of such person;
reimbursement obligations of such person arising from bankers’ acceptance, letters of credit or letters of guarantee
or similar instruments;
indebtedness of such person for the deferred purchase price of property or services, other than for consumable
non-capital goods and services purchased in the ordinary course of business, including arising under any
conditional sale or title retention agreement, but excluding for greater certainty ordinary course accounts payable;
obligations of such person under or in respect of Capital Leases, synthetic leases, Purchase Money Security
Interests or sale and leaseback transactions;
the aggregate amount at which shares in the capital of such person that are redeemable at fixed dates or intervals
or at the option of the holder thereof may be redeemed; and
(i)
guarantees or liens granted by such person in respect of Indebtedness of another person;
“Purchase Money Security Interest” means a lien created or incurred by the Company or one of its subsidiaries securing
Indebtedness incurred to finance the acquisition of property (including the cost of installation thereof), provided that (i) such lien
is created substantially simultaneously with the acquisition of such property, (ii) such lien does not at any time encumber any
property other than the property financed by such Indebtedness, (iii) the amount of Indebtedness secured thereby is not increased
subsequent to such acquisition, and (iv) the principal amount of Indebtedness secured by any such lien at no time exceeds 100%
of the original purchase price of such property and the cost of installation thereof, and for the purposes of this definition the term
“acquisition” includes a Capital Lease;
57
Table of Contents
“Senior Creditor” means a holder or holders of Specified Senior Indebtedness and includes any representative or representatives
or trustee or trustees of any such holder or holders; and
“Specified Senior Indebtedness” means, without duplication, the Indebtedness under the Company’s existing asset-backed lending
facility and such other indebtedness as the Company shall designate as “Specified Senior Indebtedness” by notice to the Trustee
in writing; provided that the aggregate principal amount of Specified Senior Indebtedness shall not exceed $550,000,000 at any
one time outstanding; provided, further, that all Specified Senior Indebtedness must constitute:
(j)
(k)
(l)
Indebtedness referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of Indebtedness above;
renewals, extensions, restructurings, refinancings and refundings of any such Indebtedness; and
guarantees of any of the foregoing.
MARKET FOR SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY
The Company’s common shares are listed and posted for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “BB” and
are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BBRY”. The volume of trading and price ranges of the
Company’s common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ Global Select Market during the previous fiscal
year are set out in the following table:
Month
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
Common Shares – TSX
Common Shares – NASDAQ
Price Range
(CDN $)
Average Daily
Volume
Price Range
(US $)
Average Daily
Volume
$12.90-$17.22
7,484,160
$12.55-$16.82
$13.43-$16.72
4,221,518
$13.10-$16.59
$14.33-$16.63
3,748,182
$13.83-$16.49
$10.75-$15.79
4,024,000
$10.25-$15.09
$8.80-$10.85
$9.03-$12.59
$7.99-$12.07
$7.75-$8.84
$6.25-$8.38
$5.79-$8.28
$7.79-$12.03
$9.83-$12.07
2,444,864
$8.57-$10.62
2,931,133
$8.72-$12.18
4,160,480
$7.75-$11.65
1,841,995
$7.51-$8.45
1,821,871
$5.98-$8.04
2,295,430
$5.44-$7.80
4,031,968
$7.33-$10.85
3,447,979
$8.92-$10.76
59,641,080
30,812,068
24,047,632
26,902,725
19,794,432
28,756,964
33,922,255
15,394,787
20,319,500
25,399,986
35,179,738
23,899,695
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
As at the date hereof, the Company currently has a Board comprised of seven persons. Pursuant to a special resolution of
shareholders, the directors are authorized from time to time to increase the size of the Board and to fix the number of directors,
up to the maximum of 15 persons, as currently provided under the articles of the Company, without the prior consent of the
shareholders.
On March 28, 2013, the Company announced the retirement of Mike Lazaridis, Vice Chair and director effective May 1, 2013.
On the closing of the Debenture Financing on November 13, 2013, John S. Chen was appointed Interim Chief Executive
Officer and Executive Chair of the Board. On the same day, Prem Watsa rejoined the Board as lead independent director and
Chair of the Compensation, Nomination and Governance Committee (after having resigned as a director on August 12, 2013, in
connection with the formation of the Special Committee to explore strategic alternatives), and the Company announced the
resignations of Thorsten Heins as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director, and David Kerr as a director.
On November 25, 2013, the Company announced the resignation of Roger Martin as a director, and the departures of Kristian
Tear, Chief Operating Officer, and Frank Boulben, Chief Marketing Officer. On the same day, the Company announced that
James Yersh had replaced Brian Bidulka as its Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Bidulka was retained as a special advisor to the
Chief Executive Officer for the remainder of fiscal 2014 to assist with the transition. The Company also announced the
following executive officer appointments during fiscal 2014: on December 17, 2013, John Sims as President, Global Enterprise
Services; on December 18, 2013, James S. Mackey as Executive Vice President for Corporate Development and Strategic
58
Table of Contents
Planning and Mark Wilson as Senior Vice President, Marketing (effective January 2014); on January 6, 2014, Ron Louks as
President, Devices and Emerging Solutions; and on January 13, 2014, Eric Johnson as President, Global Sales.
The following table sets forth the name, province or state, and country of residence of each director and executive officer of the
Company and their respective positions and offices held with the Company and their principal occupations during the last five
years as of March 1, 2014. Each director is elected at the annual meeting of shareholders to serve until the next annual meeting
or until a successor is elected or appointed.
Name and Residence
John S. Chen
California, USA
Prem Watsa (1)
Ontario, Canada
Current Position with
Company
Chief Executive
Officer; Executive
Chair/Director (since
November 2013)
Lead Director (since
November 2013)(2)
Principal Occupation During the Last Five Years (other than Current
Position with Company)
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman, Sybase Inc.
(1998 to 2012)
Chief Executive Officer, Fairfax (currently)
Barbara Stymiest, FCPA, FCA (1)(3)
Ontario, Canada
Director (since 2007)
Corporate Director (currently); member of the Group
Executive, Royal Bank of Canada (2004 to 2011)
Timothy Dattels (3)
California, USA
Claudia Kotchka, CPA (3)
Ohio, USA
Richard Lynch (1)
Pennsylvania, USA
Bert Nordberg (1)
Malmo, Sweden
Dan Dodge
Ontario, Canada
Sai Yuen (Billy) Ho
California, USA
Eric Johnson
New York, USA
Director (since 2012)
Senior Partner, TPG Capital LP (currently and since prior to
2009)
Director (since 2011)
Corporate Director (currently); Vice President, Design
Innovation & Strategy, Procter & Gamble (since prior to
2009)
Director (since 2013)
President, FB Associates, LLC (currently); Executive Vice
President, Strategic Technology Initiatives (2010 to 2011)
and Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
(2007 to 2010), Verizon Communications Inc.
Director (since 2013)
Corporate Director (currently); President and Chief Executive
Officer, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB (2009 to
2012)
President, CEO and
CTO, QNX (since
prior to 2009)
Executive Vice
President, Enterprise
Engineering
President, Global
Sales
Retired (2013); Senior Vice President & General Manager,
Sybase Inc. (2009 to 2012)
SVP and GM, Global Database and Technology, SAP (2013);
SVP and GM, Platform & Analytics Sales North America,
SAP (2012 to 2013); SVP and GM North America, Sybase
Inc. (2004 to 2012)
Chief Executive Officer, The OpenNMS Group (2013); Chief
Executive Officer, Plus 1, LLC (2012 to 2013); Chief
Strategy Officer, HTC Corporation (2010 to 2011); Chief
Technology Officer, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
(2009 to 2010)
SVP, Corporate Development and Corporate Strategy, Open
Text, Inc. (from 2012 to 2013); SVP, Corporate
Development, SAP AG (from 2004 to 2012)
Ron Louks
North Carolina, USA
President, Devices and
Emerging Solutions
James S. Mackey
Pennsylvania, USA
Executive Vice
President, Corporate
Development and
Strategic Planning
59
Table of Contents
Nigel Perks
Ontario, Canada
John Sims
California, USA
Mark Wilson
California, USA
Executive Vice
President, Human
Resources
President, Global
Enterprise Services
Chief HR Officer, BT Global Services (2008 - 2013)
Global Head of Telecom & President, SAP Mobile Services
(from 2011 to 2013); President, SAP Mobile Services (2011
to 2013); CEO, 724 Solutions (2001 to 2010)
Senior Vice President,
Marketing
Chief Marketing Officer, Avaya (2012 to 2013); SVP,
Corporate and Field Marketing, Sybase Inc. (2010 to 2012);
VP, Corporate Marketing, Sybase Inc. (2007 to 2010)
James Yersh
Ontario, Canada
Chief Financial
Officer
Senior Vice President and Controller, BlackBerry (2008 -
November 2013)
Steve Zipperstein
California, USA
Chief Legal Officer &
Corporate Secretary
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary,
Verizon Wireless
Notes:
1
2
3
Member of the Compensation, Nomination and Governance Committee (Chair - Prem Watsa)
As noted above, Mr. Watsa first joined the Company as a director in January 2012, but then resigned on August 13,
2013 as a result of the Special Committee formed by the Board to explore strategic alternatives.
Member of the Audit and Risk Management Committee (Chair - Barbara Stymiest)
As at March 1, 2014, the above directors and executive officers of the Company beneficially owned, or controlled or directed,
directly or indirectly, approximately 119,000 common shares of the Company representing approximately 0.02% of the issued
and outstanding common shares of the Company. In addition, as of such date, Fairfax and certain of its wholly-owned or
controlled subsidiaries beneficially owned approximately 46,783,700 million common shares of the Company (the “Fairfax
Shares”) representing approximately 8.9% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company, or 96,783,700
million common shares of the Company representing approximately 16.8% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the
Company assuming conversion of all of its Debentures and after giving effect to the conversion. Prem Watsa, a director of the
Company, is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fairfax and may be deemed under applicable U.S. securities laws to
beneficially own the Fairfax Shares by virtue of his position at Fairfax.
The Board has two active standing committees: an Audit and Risk Management Committee and a Compensation Nomination
and Governance Committee, the members of which are noted above. A third committee, the Strategic Planning Committee,
was dissolved on November 20, 2013 and a fourth committee, the Innovation Committee, was dissolved on May 21, 2013.
The Company does not have an Executive Committee.
Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions
Other than set out below, none of the directors or executive officers is, as at the date of this AIF, or was within 10 years before
the date of the AIF, a director or chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any company (including the Company) that:
a)
b)
was subject to an order (as defined in National Instrument 51-102F2 of the Canadian Securities Administrators)
that was issued while the director or executive officer was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive
officer or chief financial officer; or
was subject to an order that was issued after the director or executive officer ceased to be a director, chief
executive officer, or chief financial officer, and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person
was acting in the capacity as a director, chief executive officer, or chief financial officer.
Other than as set out below, none of the directors, executive officers or a shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities
of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company,
a)
is, at the date of this AIF, or has been within 10 years before the date of this AIF, a director or executive officer
of any company (including the Company) that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of
that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to
bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with
creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or
60
Table of Contents
b)
has, within the 10 years before this AIF, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to
bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with
creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the director, executive
officer or shareholder.
On November 7, 2006, as a result of the Company failing to file its second quarter financial statements for fiscal 2007 before
the statutory filing deadline of October 17, 2006 a management cease trade order (the “MCTO”) was issued by the OSC that
applied to Messrs. Lazaridis, Richardson and Bidulka as well as certain of the Company’s other senior officers and certain
insiders of the Company. The MCTO prohibited trading in the Company’s securities by its senior officers, directors and certain
insiders during the time that the MCTO was in effect. The MCTO was revoked on May 23, 2007 after the required securities
filings were made by the Company with the OSC.
On November 21, 2013, TranSwitch Corporation filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut. Mr. Lynch was a member of the board
of directors of TranSwitch Corporation from November 2010 and the chairman of the board from July 2012, until termination
of the board on the date of the bankruptcy filing when a trustee was appointed.
Conflicts of Interest
There is no existing or, to the Company's knowledge, potential material conflicts of interest between the Company or a
subsidiary of the Company and any director or officer of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company. See also “Interest of
Management and Others in Material Transactions” in this AIF.
AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
The Audit and Risk Management Committee’s purpose is to provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary
obligations with respect to matters involving the accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control, and legal
compliance and risk management functions of the Company and its subsidiaries. It is the objective of the Audit and Risk
Management Committee to maintain free and open means of communications among the Board, the independent auditors and
the financial and senior management of the Company.
The full text of the Audit and Risk Management Committee’s Charter is included as Appendix A to this AIF.
Ms. Stymiest (Chair), Mr. Dattels and Ms. Kotchka are the members of the Committee, each of whom is a director of the
Company and independent and financially literate under Sections 1.4 and 1.5 of National Instrument 52-110 of the Canadian
Securities Administrators - Audit Committees and the rules and regulations of the NASDAQ Stock Market. The members of the
Audit and Risk Management Committee bring significant skill and experience to their responsibilities including professional
experience in accounting, business and finance. The specific education and experience of each member that is relevant to the
performance of his or her responsibilities as such member of the Audit and Risk Management Committee are set out below:
Barbara Stymiest, FCPA, FCA (Chair) – Ms. Stymiest has an HBA from the Richard Ivey School of Business, University of
Western Ontario and an FCA from the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario. From 2004 to 2011, Ms. Stymiest held
various senior management positions in the Royal Bank of Canada and served as a member of the Group Executive responsible
for the overall strategic direction of the company. Prior to this, Ms. Stymiest held positions as Chief Executive Officer at TSX
Group Inc., Executive Vice-President & CFO at BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. and Partner of Ernst & Young LLP. Ms. Stymiest is
currently a Director of George Weston Limited, Sun Life Financial Inc., University Health Network and the Canadian Institute
for Advanced Research.
Timothy Dattels – Mr. Dattels has an MBA from Harvard Business School and is a Senior Partner of TPG Capital. Prior to
joining TPG, Mr. Dattels served as a partner and Managing Director of Goldman Sachs and was head of Investment Banking
for all Asian countries other than Japan. Through these roles, Mr. Dattels has gained extensive experience with financial
analysis, financial advisory, analytics for mergers and acquisitions, public valuations, and financial valuation.
Claudia Kotchka, BBA, CPA – Ms. Kotchka has a BBA, Cum Laude, from Ohio University and is a Certified Public
Accountant. Ms. Kotchka held various executive roles during her 31 year career at Procter & Gamble, including Vice-
President, Design Innovation & Strategy from 2001 to 2009. Ms. Kotchka is an independent consultant to Fortune 500
companies on innovation, strategy and design. She is also a speaker at conferences and forums on design and innovation and
has been featured in numerous books and articles on innovation. She is a member of the board of trustees of the Smithsonian
Design Museum at the Cooper-Hewitt in New York and is a regular guest lecturer at Stanford University.
61
Table of Contents
The Board has also determined that Ms. Stymiest is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of General
Instruction B(8)(a) of Form 40-F under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The SEC has indicated that the
designation of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not make such person an “expert” for any purpose, impose
any duties, obligations or liability on such person that are greater than those imposed on members of the Audit Committee and
the Board who do not carry this designation or affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the audit
committee or the Board.
As set out in the Audit and Risk Management Committee’s charter, the committee is responsible for pre-approving all non-audit
services to be provided to the Company by its independent external auditor. The Company’s practice requires senior
management to report to the Audit and Risk Management Committee any provision of services by the auditors and requires
consideration as to whether the provision of the services other than audit services is compatible with maintaining the auditor’s
independence. All audit and audit-related services are pre-approved by the Audit and Risk Management Committee.
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) chartered accountants, the Company’s independent external auditor,
for the fiscal years ended March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, respectively, for professional services rendered by EY for the audit
of the Company’s annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by EY in connection with statutory and
regulatory filings or engagements for such fiscal years were $5,128,000 and $4,195,000 respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
The aggregate fees billed by EY for the fiscal years ended March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, respectively, for assurance and
related services rendered by EY that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s
financial statements and are not reported above as "Audit Fees" were $167,000 and $107,000. The fees paid in this category
relate to provision of assurance services related to certain contractual compliance clauses, as well as the Company’s corporate
social responsibility disclosures.
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed by EY for the fiscal years ended March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, respectively, for professional
services rendered by EY for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning and other services were $11,000 and $13,000 respectively.
Tax services provided included international tax compliance engagements.
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
During the three-year period ending March 1, 2014 and during the current financial year up to the date hereof, none of the
Company's directors, executive officers, 10 percent shareholders or any of their associates or affiliates had a material interest,
directly or indirectly, in any transaction that has materially affected or is reasonably expected to materially affect the Company,
other than Mr. Watsa, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and a significant shareholder, of Fairfax, which participated in
the Debenture Financing and continues to hold a significant proportion of the outstanding Debentures. See “General
Development of the Business” and “Description of Capital Structure - Convertible Debentures” in this AIF.
TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS
The Company’s transfer agent and registrar in Canada is Computershare Investor Services Inc. of Canada, 100 University Ave.,
8th Fl., Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1. The co-transfer agent and registrar for the common shares in the United States is
Computershare Trust Company, Inc. at its offices in Denver, Colorado.
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
Other than as noted below, the Company has not entered into any material contracts, on or after January 1, 2002, that are
required to be filed pursuant to NI 51-102 of the Canadian Securities Administrators:
•
the settlement agreement and licensing agreement with NTP, Inc. (the “Settlement and Licensing Agreements”), both
of which can be found under the Company’s profile on www.sedar.com. The Settlement and Licensing Agreements are
summarized in the Company’s material change report filed on SEDAR on March 10, 2006, which is incorporated by
reference in this AIF; and
62
Table of Contents
•
the Trust Indenture providing for the issuance and conversion of the Debentures, dated as of November 13, 2013, as
supplemented by the Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 12, 2013, which have been filed on SEDAR, and
the terms of which are summarized under “Description of Capital Structure - Convertible Debentures”.
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS
Ernst & Young LLP, Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants, is the external auditor who prepared the
Independent Auditors’ Report to Shareholders in respect of the audited annual consolidated financial statements of the
Company for the year ended March 1, 2014 and the Report to Shareholders of an Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm on the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP is independent with respect to the
Company within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario and
applicable securities laws.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information related to the Company can be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or on the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov. Additional financial information is provided in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the
Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended
March 1, 2014, which can be found at www.sedar.com.
Additional information, including directors’ and officers’ remuneration and indebtedness to the Company, principal holders of
the securities of the Company and securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, is contained in the
Company’s most recent management information circular.
63
Table of Contents
GLOSSARY
Set forth below are certain terms defined as they are used in this AIF:
1xRTT
3G wireless
4G wireless
Analog
API
ASIC
BlackBerry
Authentic
Accessories
Bluetooth®
BYOD
CDMA
Common
Criteria
Certification
CRM
Single carrier (1X) Radio Transmission Technology. 1xRTT is the first phase in CDMA’s evolution to third-
generation (3G) technology. 1xRTT networks should allow for greater network capacity (more users; fewer
dropped calls) high bit rate packet data transfer.
Third generation (3G) wireless. Third generation wireless is a global framework that is implemented
regionally in Europe (UMTS), North America (CDMA2000) and Japan (NTT DoCoMo). 3G is designed for
high-speed wireless multimedia data and voice. It plans to offer high-quality audio and video and advanced
global roaming, which means users would be able to go anywhere and automatically be handed off to
whatever wireless system is available.
Fourth generation (4G) wireless. Fourth generation is successor to 3G and 2G standards. The nomenclature
of the generations generally refers to a change in the fundamental nature of the service. The first was the
move from analog to digital (2G), which was followed by multi-media support (3G) and now 4G, which
refers to all IP packet-switched networks and increases in data speeds.
Analog transmission uses energy waves to transmit information. In the case of wireless voice transmission,
the sound waves of a human voice are converted directly to specific, continuously variable characteristics of
a radio wave. Broadcast and telephone transmission have typically used analog technology.
Application Programming Interface.
Application Specific Integrated Circuit.
A range of BlackBerry approved accessories that enhance a user’s product experience through
personalization and convenience. This includes carrying, protection, audio, and power solutions
Bluetooth is a specification for the use of low-power radio communications to wirelessly link phones,
computers and other network devices over short distances.
Bring your own device is a term that is used when referring to an organization’s policy that permits
employees to bring personally owned devices to their workplace and use these devices to access privileged
company information and applications.
Code Division Multiple Access. A method for transmitting simultaneous signals over a shared portion of the
spectrum. The foremost application of CDMA is the digital cellular phone technology from QUALCOMM
that operates in the 800MHz band and 1.9GHz PCS band. Unlike GSM and TDMA, which divides the
spectrum into different time slots, CDMA uses a spread spectrum technique to assign a code to each
conversation.
An internationally approved set of security standards that provide an independent and objective validation
of the security of a particular IT solution or product. This certification is accepted by 25 countries under the
Common Criteria Recognition Agreement which includes the US, Canada, Germany, France and many
others.
Customer Relationship Management. Customer relationship management is strategy for managing a
company’s interactions with customers and sales prospects. It involves using technology to organize,
automate and synchronize business processes—principally sales related activities, but also those for
marketing, customer service, and technical support.
Denial of
Service Attack
An attack designed to flood a network with unnecessary traffic in order to prevent legitimate users of a
system from having access.
Digital
EDGE
EMS
Firewall
Firmware
A way of processing information by storing it as binary numbers. A digital circuit is either on or off, and a
digital signal is either present or absent. Contrast with analog.
See 3G Wireless.
Electronics Manufacturing Services. Is a term used for companies that design, test, manufacture, distribute,
and provide return/repair services for electronic components and assemblies for original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs).
A technological barrier designed to prevent unauthorized or unwanted communications between sections of
a computer network.
Computer programming instructions that are stored in a read-only memory unit, including flash, ROM,
PROM, EPROM and EEPROM, rather than being implemented through software.
64
Table of Contents
GPRS
GPS
GSM
HSPA
iDEN
IM
IP
IPSec
Java
LTE
NFC
NOC
PBX
PDA
PIM
General Packet Radio Service. An enhancement to the GSM (see below) mobile communications system
that supports data packets. GPRS enables continuous flows of IP data packets over the system for such
applications as Web browsing and data access. GPRS differs from GSM’s short messaging service, which is
limited to messages of 160 bytes in length.
Global Positioning System.
Global System for Mobile Communications. A digital cellular phone technology based on TDMA that is the
predominant system in Europe, but is also used around the world. Operating in the 900MHz and 1.8GHz
bands in Europe and the 1.9GHz PCS band in the U.S., GSM defines the entire cellular system, not just the
air interface (i.e. TDMA, CDMA). GSM phones use a Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) smart card that
contains user account information.
High-Speed Packet Access. A family of radio interface standards that will improve the speed and accuracy
of traffic over cellular networks. HSPA builds on the existing WCDMA technology that has already been
deployed to allow carriers to offer better speeds and larger bandwidth intensive services like streaming
audio and video.
Integrated Digital Enhanced Network. A wireless communications technology from Motorola that provides
support for voice, data, short messages (SMS) and dispatch radio (two-way radio) in one phone. Operating
in the 800MHz and 1.5GHz bands and based on TDMA, iDEN uses Motorola’s VSELP (Vector Sum
Excited Linear Predictors) vocoder for voice compression and QAM modulation to deliver 64 Kbps over a
25 kHz channel. Each 25 kHz channel can be divided six times to transmit any mix of voice, data, dispatch
or text message. Used by various carriers around the globe, Nextel Communications provides nationwide
coverage in the U.S.
Instant Messaging. A medium which enables two or more people to communicate in real time utilizing
typed text over an electronic network.
Intellectual Property. Intangible property that is the result of creativity (such as patents or trademarks or
copyrights).
Internet Protocol Security. Allows for the securing of IP communications by authenticating and encrypting
IP packet of a communication exchange from host-to-host.
An object-oriented programming language developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. Java was designed to be
secure and platform-neutral such that it can be run on any type of platform, making Java a useful language
for programming Internet applications.
Long Term Evolution is a wireless communication standard of high-speed data for smartphones and data
terminals
Near Field Communication. Technology that allows smartphones and similar devices to link together
through radio communication, when tapping them together, or bringing them into close proximity.
Network Operations Centre. A central location for network management. It functions as a control centre for
network monitoring, analysis and accounting.
Private Branch Exchange. A private telephone network used within an enterprise. Users share a fixed
number of outside lines instead of being provided with one outside line for each individual user. This allows
for use of extensions as opposed to direct dial numbers.
Personal digital assistant. A hand held portable microcomputer.
Personal Information Management.
QWERTY
The modern-day keyboard layout on English-language computer and typewriter keyboards. It takes its name
from the first six characters seen in the far left of the keyboard’s top row of letters.
ROM
SDK
Read Only Memory. A class of storage media used in computers and other electronic devices. Once data has
been written to a ROM chip, it cannot be removed and can only be read.
Software Developers Kit. A set of software routines and utilities used to help programmers write an
application.
65
Table of Contents
SMS
SSL
Short Message Service. A text message service that enables short messages of generally no more than
140-160 characters in length to be sent and transmitted from a wireless device and is broadly supported on
cellular phones. SMS was introduced in the GSM system and later supported by all other digital-based
mobile communications systems.
Secure Sockets Layer. Protocols that provide security to Internet communications by encrypting the
segments of network connections.
UMTS
See 3G wireless.
WCDMA
See 3G wireless.
Wi-Fi
Wireless Fidelity. A generic term for referring to wireless network components that run on the Wi-Fi
Alliances IEEE 802.11 wireless standards. The standard was created so that manufacturers could produce
wireless equipment that would be compatible with one another.
66
Table of Contents
APPENDIX A
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BLACKBERRY LIMITED AS ADOPTED BY
THE BOARD ON MARCH 27, 2014
1.
AUTHORITY
The Audit and Risk Management Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of BlackBerry Limited
(the "Corporation") is established pursuant to Section 5.03 of the Corporation's Amended and Restated By-law No. A3 and Section
158 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act. The Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors as determined from
time to time by resolution of the Board. Consistent with the appointment of other Board committees, the members of the Committee
shall be appointed by the Board at the annual organizational meeting of the Board or at such other time as may be determined by
the Board, and shall serve until the earlier of (i) the death of the member; or (ii) the resignation, disqualification or removal of the
member from the Committee or from the Board. The Chair of the Committee shall be a member of the Committee designated by
the Board, provided that if the Board does not so designate a Chair, the members of the Committee, by majority vote, may designate
a Chair. The duties of the Chair are included in Annex A.
The presence in person or by telephone of a majority of the Committee's members shall constitute a quorum for any meeting of
the Committee. All actions of the Committee will require the vote of a majority of its members present at a meeting of the
Committee at which a quorum is present. Any decision or determination of the Committee reduced to writing and signed by all
members of the Committee who would have been entitled to vote on such decision or determination at a meeting of the
Committee shall be fully as effective as if it had been made at a meeting duly called and held.
2.
PURPOSE OF THE COMMITTEE
The Committee's purpose is to provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations with respect to
matters involving the accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal compliance functions of the
Corporation and its subsidiaries as well as the oversight of the risk performance and audit function, including risk management
frameworks, principles and policies to ensure that management is effectively managing the Corporation’s risks. It is the
objective of the Committee to maintain free and open means of communication among the Board, the independent auditors and
the financial and senior management of the Corporation.
3.
COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE
Each member of the Committee shall be an "independent" director within the meaning of Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley"), the rules promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), the
rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq") and National Instrument 52-110 “Audit Committees” of the securities regulators
in Canada, and, as such, shall be free from any relationship that may interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment
as a member of the Committee.
All members of the Committee shall be financially literate at the time of their election to the Committee. "Financial literacy" shall
be determined by the Board in the exercise of its business judgment, and shall include the ability to read and understand a set of
financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth
and complexity of issues that can be reasonably expected to be raised by the Corporation’s financial statements. At least one
member of the Committee shall be an "audit committee financial expert" with the meaning of Section 407 of Sarbanes-Oxley and
the rules promulgated thereunder by the SEC. Members of the Committee may not serve, in the aggregate, on more than 3 audit
committees of public companies, unless the Board has determined that such service will not impair the member’s ability to serve
on the Committee.
Committee members, if they or the Board deem it appropriate, may enhance their understanding of finance and accounting by
participating in educational programs conducted by the Corporation or an outside consultant or firm. At least annually, the
Committee shall review its performance and the contribution of each of its members. This review will be completed on a
confidential basis in conjunction with the annual Board performance review process.
4.
MEETINGS OF THE COMMITTEE
The Committee shall meet with such frequency and at such intervals as it shall determine is necessary to carry out its duties and
responsibilities. The Chair or any member of the Committee may call meetings of the Committee by notifying the Corporate
67
Table of Contents
Secretary of the Corporation. Notice of meetings may be done through any efficient communication medium (i.e. email, facsimile,
mail, etc.) provided the notification is capable of being received at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting. Each
member of the Committee shall be responsible for providing up-to-date contact information to the Corporate Secretary to ensure
efficient and timely communication. All independent directors may attend Committee meetings, provided that directors who are
not members of the Committee shall not be entitled to vote, nor shall their attendance be counted as part of the quorum of the
Committee.
As part of its purpose to foster open communications, the Committee shall meet at least annually with management and the
Corporation's independent auditors in separate executive sessions to discuss any matters that the Committee or each of these groups
or persons believe should be discussed privately. The Committee will have unrestricted access to management and employees of
the Corporation in order to carry out its duties and responsibilities. In addition, the Committee should meet or confer with the
independent auditors and management to review the Corporation's financial statements, MD&A, annual and interim earnings press
releases and related filings prior to their public release and filing with the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”), the SEC or
any other regulatory body. The Chair should work with the Chief Financial Officer and management to establish the agendas for
Committee meetings. The Committee, in its discretion, may ask members of management or others to attend its meetings (or
portions thereof) and to provide pertinent information as necessary.
Minutes of the Committee will be recorded and maintained by the Corporate Secretary and presented to the Committee at the next
Committee meeting for approval. The Corporate Secretary, or his/her designate as approved by the Committee Chair, shall act as
secretary for the meetings. For in camera sessions of the Committee without management present, minutes will be recorded and
maintained by the Chair of the Committee or his/her designate. Each member of the Board will have access to the minutes of the
Committee’s meetings, regardless of whether he or she is a member of the Committee, and the Chair shall report to the Board at
its next meeting on the activities, findings and recommendations of the Committee following each meeting. Minutes relating to
in camera sessions may be provided to Board members with the consent of the Chair.
5.
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMMITTEE
The Committee is responsible for the oversight of the Corporation’s accounting, financial reporting and risk management processes,
including (i) the Corporation’s internal controls, and the nomination and appointment (subject to Board and shareholder approval),
compensation, retention, evaluation and oversight of the work of the Corporation's independent auditors engaged for the purpose
of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Corporation, and
(ii) the oversight of the Corporation's Risk Performance and Audit Group (“RPA Group”) as more particularly detailed below.
The independent auditors and the RPA Group, through the leader of the RPA Group or his/her designee must report and otherwise
communicate directly to the Committee and are accountable to the Committee. The Committee's oversight responsibilities include
the authority to approve all audit engagement fees and terms, as well as all permitted non-audit engagements and resolution of
disagreements between management and the independent auditors regarding financial reporting as well as oversight of the annual
audit plan of the RPA Group. The Committee shall take such actions as it may deem necessary to satisfy itself that the Corporation's
auditors are independent of management within the meaning of applicable law.
While there is no "blueprint" to be followed by the Committee in carrying out its duties and responsibilities, the following should
be considered within the authority of the Committee:
Selection and Evaluation of External Auditors
(1) Make recommendations to the Board as to the selection of the firm of independent public accountants to audit
the books and accounts of the Corporation and its subsidiaries for each fiscal year;
(2) Review and approve the Corporation's independent auditors' annual engagement letter, including the proposed
fees contained therein;
(3) Review the performance of the Corporation's independent auditors, including the lead partner, discuss the timing
and process for implementing the rotation of the lead partner, and make recommendations to the Board regarding the replacement
or termination of the independent auditors when circumstances warrant;
(4) Oversee the independence of the Corporation's independent auditors by, among other things:
(i)
requiring the independent auditors to deliver to the Committee on a periodic basis a formal written
statement delineating all relationships between the independent auditors and the Corpora-tion;
(ii)
reviewing and approving hiring policies concerning partners, employees and former partners and
68
Table of Contents
employees of the present and former independent auditors; and
(iii)
actively engaging in a dialogue with the independent auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships
or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent auditors and taking
appropriate action to satisfy itself of the auditors' independence;
(5)
Instruct the Corporation's independent auditors that:
(i)
they are ultimately accountable to the Committee;
(ii)
they must report directly to the Committee; and
(iii)
the Committee is responsible for the appointment (subject to Board and shareholder approval),
compensation, retention, evaluation and oversight of the Corporation's independent auditors;
(6) Review and pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors
to the Corporation, including tax services;
Oversight of Annual Audit and Quarterly Reviews
(1) Review and accept, if appropriate, the annual audit plan of the Corporation's independent auditors, including
the scope of audit activities, and monitor such plan's progress and results during the year;
(2) Confirm through private discussions with the Corporation's independent auditors and the Corporation's
management that no management restrictions are being placed on the scope of the independent auditors' work;
(3) Review the results of the year-end audit of the Corporation, including (as applicable):
(i)
(ii)
the audit reports on the Corporation's financial statements and management's assessment of internal
control over financial reporting, the published financial statements, the management representation
letter, the "Memorandum Regarding Ac-counting Procedures and Internal Control" or similar
memorandum prepared by the Corporation's independent auditors, any other pertinent reports and
management's responses concerning such memorandum;
the qualitative judgments of the independent auditors about the appropriateness, not just the
acceptability, of accounting principles and financial disclosure practices used or proposed to be adopted
by the Corporation and, particularly, about the degree of aggressiveness or conservatism of its
accounting principles and underlying estimates;
(iii)
the selection and application of the Corporation’s critical accounting policies;
(iv)
the methods used to account for significant unusual transactions;
(v)
the effect of significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack
of authoritative guidance or consensus;
(vi) management's process for formulating sensitive accounting estimates and the reasonableness of these
estimates;
(vii)
significant recorded and unrecorded audit adjustments;
(viii)
any material accounting issues among management, the RPA Group (as defined above) and the
independent auditors; and
(ix)
other matters required to be communicated to the Committee under applicable auditing standards by
the independent auditors;
(4)
Review the Corporation’s interim financial statements and quarterly earnings press releases and report thereon
to the Board before such documents are approved by the Board and disclosed to the public;
69
Table of Contents
(5)
Review with management and the Corporation's independent auditors such accounting policies (and changes
therein) of the Corporation, including any financial reporting issues which could have a material impact on the Corporation's
financial statements, as are deemed appropriate for review by the Committee prior to any year-end or quarterly filings with the
SEC, the OSC or other regulatory body;
Oversight of Risk Management
(1) Require management to identify and review with the Committee a portfolio view of the major areas of risk facing
the Corporation and management's strategies to manage those risks;
(2) Review, at least annually, management’s risk appetite;
(3) At least annually, review in light of risk appetite, the Corporation’s enterprise risk management process, including
key policies and procedures for the effective identification, assessment, monitoring and control of the Corporation’s principal risks
and the Corporation’s compliance with such policies and procedures;
(4) Require, at least quarterly, management to update the Committee on any material or noteworthy changes relating
to (1)-(3), immediately above, and the activities of the Corporation’s Risk Management and Compliance Council;
(5) Consult periodically with the Compensation, Nomination and Governance Committee on risk management
matters within its purview;
(6)
Encourage an open and constructive risk dialogue between the Board and management on areas relating to risk
management;
Oversight of the RPA Group and Quarterly Reviews
(1) Review the Committee’s level of involvement and interaction with the Corporation’s RPA Group, including the
Committee’s line of authority and role in appointing and compensating employees in the RPA Group;
(2) Review and advise on the appointment, replacement, reassignment, or dismissal of the leader of the RPA Group;
(3) Review the performance, effectiveness, degree of independence and objectivity of the RPA Group and the
adequacy of its audit process;
(4) Review RPA Group reports, as well as management’s response to such reports, and review and approve the
annual audit plan of the RPA Group, including the proposed audit universe, priorities, staffing, and, on a quarterly basis, the status
of the audit plan and the then current assessment and management of risk;
(5) Review the effectiveness of the RPA Group's methodology relating to its assessment of risks to the Corporation,
including the factors considered and the relative weighting of such factors, and consider changes in management's assessment of
risks;
(6) Review with management the progress and results of all RPA Group projects, approve procedures for
implementing accepted recommendations, and, when deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee, direct the Corporation’s
Chief Executive Officer to assign additional audit projects to the leader of the RPA Group;
(7) Meet privately with the leader of the RPA Group to discuss any areas of concern, and to confirm that (i) significant
issues are brought to the Committee’s attention, (ii) the principal risks of the Corporation’s business have been identified by
management and appropriate policies and systems have been implemented to manage such risks, and (iii) the integrity of the
Company’s internal control and management information systems are satisfactory;
Oversight of Financial Reporting Process and Internal Controls
(1) Review the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation's accounting and internal control policies and
procedures through inquiry and discussions with the Corporation's independent auditors and management of the Corporation;
70
Table of Contents
(2) Review with management the Corporation's administrative, operational and accounting internal controls and
internal control over financial reporting, including controls and security of the computerized information systems, and evaluate
whether the Corporation is operating in accordance with its prescribed policies, procedures and codes of conduct;
(3) Review with management and the independent auditors any reportable conditions and material weaknesses
affecting the Corporation’s internal control and financial reporting;
(4) Receive periodic reports from the Corporation's independent auditors and management of the Corporation to
assess the impact on the Corporation of significant accounting or financial reporting developments proposed by the Chartered
Professional Accountants Canada, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board, the SEC, the OSC or other regulatory body, or any other significant accounting or financial reporting related matters that
may have a bearing on the Corporation;
(5)
Establish and maintain free and open means of communication between and among the Board, the Committee,
the Corporation's independent auditors, the RPA Group and management;
Other Matters
(1) Meet at least annually with the general counsel, and outside counsel when appropriate, to review legal and
regulatory matters, including inquiries from governmental and regulatory authorities and any matters that may have a material
impact on the financial statements of the Corporation;
(2) Review the Corporation's policies relating to the avoidance of conflicts of interest and review and approve related
party transactions as required by the Corporation’s Code of Business Standards and Principles and applicable laws and listing
rules, as well as policies and procedures with respect to officers' expense accounts and perquisites. The Committee shall consider
the results of any review of these policies and procedures by the Corporation's independent auditors;
(3) Oversee, review, and periodically update the Corporation’s Code of Business Standards and Principles and the
Corporation’s system to monitor compliance with and enforcement of the Code of Business Standards and Principles;
(4) Review and approve capital and operating expenditure limits on an annual basis and review and approval of any
exceptions to such limits proposed by the Corporation from time to time;
(5) Oversee areas under the responsibility of management, including the examination of securities trading by insiders;
(6) Conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the Committee's scope of responsibilities, including
retaining outside counsel or other consultants or experts for this purpose;
(7)
Establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Corporation regarding
accounting, internal controls or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Corporation of
concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and
(8)
Perform such additional activities, and consider such other matters, within the scope of its responsibilities, as
the Committee or the Board deems necessary or appropriate.
With respect to the exercise of its duties and responsibilities, the Committee should:
(1)
exercise reasonable diligence in gathering and considering all material information;
(2)
remain flexible, so that it may be in a position to best react or respond to changing circumstances or
conditions;
(3)
understand and weigh alternative courses of conduct that may be available;
(4)
focus on weighing the benefit versus harm to the Corporation and its shareholders when considering
alternative recommendations or courses of action;
71
Table of Contents
(5)
if the Committee deems it appropriate, secure independent expert advice and understand the expert's
findings and the basis for such findings, including retaining independent counsel, accountants or others to assist the
Committee in fulfilling its duties and responsibilities; and
(6)
provide management, the Corporation's independent auditors and the RPA Group with appropriate
opportunities to meet privately with the Committee.
Nothing in this Charter is intended, or should be determined, to impose on any member of the Committee a standard of care or
diligence that is in any way more onerous or extensive than the standard to which all members of the Board are subject at law.
The essence of the Committee’s responsibilities is to monitor and review the activities described in this Charter to gain
reasonable assurance, but not to ensure, that such activities are being conducted properly and effectively by the Corporation.
6.
FUNDING
The Committee's effectiveness may be compromised if it is dependent on management's discretion to compensate the independent
auditors or the advisors employed by the Committee. Consequently, the Corporation shall provide for appropriate funding, as
determined by the Committee, for payment of any compensation (1) to any independent auditors engaged for the purpose of
rendering or issuing an audit report or related work or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Corporation, and
(2) to any independent counsel or other advisors employed by the Committee.
7.
DISCLOSURE AND REVIEW OF CHARTER
The Charter shall be (1) published in the Corporation's annual report, information circular or annual information form of the
Corporation as required by law, and (2) be posted in an up-to-date format on the Corporation's web site. The Committee should
review and reassess annually the adequacy of this Charter.
* * *
While the Committee has the duties and responsibilities set forth in this Charter, the Committee is not responsible for planning or
conducting the audit or for determining whether the Corporation's consolidated financial statements are complete and accurate
and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Similarly, it is not the responsibility of the Committee to
ensure that the Corporation complies with all laws and regulations.
72
Table of Contents
11
ANNEX A
(Duties and Responsibilities of the Chair)
In addition to the duties and responsibilities set out in the Board of Directors Mandate and this Charter, the Chair will:
1. Provide overall leadership to enhance the effectiveness of the Committee, including:
a. Recommend and oversee the appropriate structure, composition, membership, and activities delegated to the Committee;
b. Chair all meetings of the Committee at which the Chair is in attendance and manage the meeting agenda so that appropriate
time and consideration can be given to the agenda items;
c. Lead discussions, foster candor among meeting participants and encourage Committee members to ask questions of senior
management, its advisors and advisors of the Committee, and express viewpoints during meetings;
d. Schedule and set the agenda for Committee meetings with input from other Committee members, the Committee’s
advisors, the Executive Chair and the Lead Director of the Board of Directors, the CEO, the Corporate Secretary and
senior management as appropriate and consider, on a proactive basis, emerging matters that should be addressed by the
Committee;
e. Facilitate the timely, accurate and proper flow of information to and from the Committee and, with input from Committee
members, maintain an open dialogue with the Corporate Secretary regarding the timeliness, quantity, quality and
completeness of information provided by senior management and advisors to the Committee;
f. Arrange for management, internal personnel, external advisors, and others to attend and present at Committee meetings
as appropriate;
g. Arrange sufficient time during Committee meetings to fully discuss agenda items and, as appropriate, defer matters that
require more information or time for discussion to a subsequent meeting;
h.
In cooperation with the Corporate Secretary, identify, monitor and report back to the Committee on the status of matters
requiring action by senior management or the Committee following the meeting with a view to ensuring that matters are
acted upon in a timely manner;
i. Review draft minutes of Committee meetings prior to their presentation to the Committee for approval and ensure that
minutes are reviewed and approved by the Committee in accordance with this Charter;
j. Carry out the responsibilities and duties of the Committee, as outlined in this Charter, and
k. Review the Committee charter and duties and responsibilities with Committee members at least annually.
2. Foster responsible decision-making by the Committee and its individual members.
3. Provide for in-camera sessions at all scheduled meetings of the Committee without management present and, as appropriate,
without the Corporate Secretary present.
4. Following each meeting of the Committee, report to the Board of Directors on the activities, findings and any recommendations
of the Committee.
5. Perform such other duties, within the scope of the Committee’s duties and responsibilities, as may be assigned by the Board
of Directors.
73
Exhibit 1.2
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of BlackBerry Limited (formerly known as Research In Motion Ltd.)
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of BlackBerry Limited [the “Company”], which are
comprised of the consolidated balance sheets as at March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, the consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years ended March 1, 2014, March 2,
2013, and March 3, 2012, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management’s responsibility for the consolidated financial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance
with United States generally accepted accounting principles, and for such internal control as management determines is
necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due
to fraud or error.
Auditors’ responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our
audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments,
the auditors consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial
statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit
opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as at March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years
ended March 1, 2014, March 2, 2013, and March 3, 2012, in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles.
Other matter
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 1, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992
Framework) and our report dated March 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Kitchener, Canada,
March 28, 2014.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of BlackBerry Limited (formerly known as Research in Motion Limited)
We have audited BlackBerry Limited’s [the “Company”] internal control over financial reporting as of March 1, 2014, based
on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (1992 Framework) (the COSO criteria). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that [1] pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; [2] provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that
receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of the Company; and [3] provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
March 1, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as at March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, and the consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years ended March 1,
2014, March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 of the Company and our report dated March 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
Kitchener, Canada,
March 28, 2014
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Shareholders of BlackBerry Limited
Management of BlackBerry Limited is responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Consolidated Financial
Statements and all of the financial information in this Annual Report. The Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and include certain amounts based upon estimates and
judgments required for such preparation. The financial information appearing throughout this Annual Report is consistent with
the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been reviewed by the Audit and Risk
Management Committee and approved by the Board of Directors of BlackBerry Limited.
In fulfilling its responsibility for the reliability and integrity of financial information, management has developed and
maintains systems of accounting and internal controls and budgeting procedures. Management believes these systems and
controls provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, transactions are executed in accordance with management’s
authorization and financial records are reliable for the preparation of accurate and timely Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company’s Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors, which consists entirely of non-
management independent directors, usually meets two times per fiscal quarter with management and the independent registered
public accounting firm to ensure that each is discharging its respective responsibilities, to review the Consolidated Financial
Statements and either the quarterly review engagement report or the independent registered public accounting firm’s report and
to discuss significant financial reporting issues and auditing matters. The Company’s external registered public accounting firm
has full and unrestricted access to the Audit and Risk Management Committee to discuss audit findings, financial reporting and
other related matters. The Audit and Risk Management Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for
consideration when the Board approves the Consolidated Financial Statements for issuance to the shareholders.
The Consolidated Financial Statements for fiscal 2014, fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm appointed by the shareholders, in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Waterloo, Ontario
March 28, 2014
/s/ John S. Chen
John S. Chen
President & CEO
BlackBerry Limited
Incorporated under the Laws of Ontario
(United States dollars, in millions)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Assets
Current
Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term investments
Accounts receivable, net
Other receivables
Inventories
Income taxes receivable
Other current assets
Deferred income tax asset
Assets held for sale
Long-term investments
Property, plant and equipment, net
Intangible assets, net
Liabilities
Current
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Deferred revenue
Long-term debt
Deferred income tax liability
Shareholders’ Equity
Capital stock and additional paid-in capital
Preferred shares: authorized unlimited number of non-voting, cumulative,
redeemable and retractable
Common shares: authorized unlimited number of non-voting, redeemable,
retractable Class A common shares and unlimited number of voting common shares
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
$
1,579
$
950
972
152
244
373
505
73
209
5,057
129
942
1,424
1,549
1,105
2,353
272
603
597
469
139
354
7,441
221
2,073
3,430
$
$
7,552
$
13,165
474
$
1,214
580
2,268
1,627
32
3,927
1,064
1,854
542
3,460
—
245
3,705
—
—
Issued - 526,551,953 voting common shares (March 2, 2013 - 524,159,844)
2,418
2,431
Treasury stock
March 1, 2014 - 7,659,685 (March 2, 2013 - 9,019,617)
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
On behalf of the Board:
John S. Chen
Director
(179)
1,394
(8)
3,625
(234)
7,267
(4)
9,460
$
7,552
$
13,165
Barbara Stymiest
Director
BlackBerry Limited
(United States dollars, in millions)
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Balance as at February 26, 2011
Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Shares issued:
Exercise of stock options
Stock-based compensation
Tax deficiencies related to stock-based
compensation
Purchase of treasury stock
Treasury shares released for restricted
share unit settlements
Balance as at March 3, 2012
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss
Shares issued:
Stock-based compensation
Tax deficiencies related to stock-based
compensation
Purchase of treasury stock
Treasury shares released for restricted
share unit settlements
Balance as at March 2, 2013
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss
Shares issued:
Exercise of stock options
Stock-based compensation
Tax deficiencies related to stock-based
compensation
Purchase of treasury stock
Treasury shares released for restricted
share unit settlements
Balance as at March 1, 2014
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Capital Stock
and Additional
Paid-In Capital
$
2,359
$
—
—
9
97
(2)
—
(17)
2,446
—
—
86
(11)
—
(90)
2,431
—
—
3
68
(13)
—
(71)
$
2,418
$
Treasury
Stock
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(160) $
—
6,749
$
1,164
(10) $
—
—
—
—
—
(156)
17
(299)
—
—
—
—
(25)
90
(234)
—
—
—
—
—
(16)
71
(179) $
—
—
—
—
—
—
7,913
(646)
—
—
—
—
—
7,267
(5,873)
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,394
$
Total
8,938
1,164
50
9
97
(2)
(156)
—
10,100
(646)
(44)
86
(11)
(25)
—
9,460
(5,873)
(4)
3
68
(13)
(16)
50
—
—
—
—
—
40
—
(44)
—
—
—
—
(4)
—
(4)
—
—
—
—
—
(8) $
—
3,625
BlackBerry Limited
(United States dollars, in millions, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
March 1,
2014
For the Year Ended
March 2,
2013
March 3,
2012
$
3,880
$
6,902
$
Revenue
Hardware and other
Service and software
Cost of sales
Hardware and other
Service and software
Gross margin
Operating expenses
Research and development
Selling, marketing and administration
Amortization
Impairment of long-lived assets
Impairment of goodwill
Debentures fair value adjustment
Operating income (loss)
Investment income (loss), net
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
Net income (loss)
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations
Total basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
$
$
$
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2,933
6,813
6,383
473
6,856
(43)
1,286
2,103
606
2,748
—
377
7,120
(7,163)
(21)
(7,184)
(1,311)
(5,873)
—
(5,873) $
(11.18) $
—
(11.18) $
4,171
11,073
7,060
579
7,639
3,434
1,509
2,111
714
—
335
—
4,669
(1,235)
15
(1,220)
(592)
(628)
(18)
(646) $
(1.20) $
(0.03)
(1.23) $
14,031
4,392
18,423
11,217
631
11,848
6,575
1,556
2,600
567
—
355
—
5,078
1,497
21
1,518
347
1,171
(7)
1,164
2.23
(0.01)
2.22
BlackBerry Limited
(United States dollars, in millions, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Net change in unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments
Net change in fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges during the
year, net of income tax recovery of $6 million (March 2, 2013 - income taxes of $3
million; March 3, 2012 - income tax recovery of $4 million)
Amounts reclassified to net income (loss) during the year, net of income tax
recovery of $6 million (March 2, 2013 - income taxes of $18 million; March 3,
2012 - income tax recovery of $14 million)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss)
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
$
$
For the Year Ended
March 2,
2013
March 3,
2012
(646) $
1,164
March 1,
2014
(5,873) $
(1)
(29)
—
11
26
(4)
(5,877) $
(55)
(44)
(690) $
(3)
14
39
50
1,214
BlackBerry Limited
(United States dollars, in millions)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
March 1,
2014
For the Year Ended
March 2,
2013
March 3,
2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities:
$
(5,873) $
—
(5,873)
(628) $
(18)
(646)
Amortization
Deferred income taxes
Stock-based compensation
Impairment of long-lived assets
Impairment of goodwill
Debentures fair value adjustment
Other
Net changes in working capital items
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition of long-term investments
Proceeds on sale or maturity of long-term investments
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds on sale of property, plant and equipment
Acquisition of intangible assets
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Acquisition of short-term investments
Proceeds on sale or maturity of short-term investments
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Issuance of common shares
Tax deficiencies related to stock-based compensation
Purchase of treasury stock
Issuance of debt
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Effect of foreign exchange gain (loss) on cash and cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the year
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
1,270
(149)
68
2,748
—
377
141
1,259
(159)
(229)
284
(283)
49
(1,080)
(7)
(1,699)
1,925
(1,040)
3
(13)
(16)
1,250
1,224
5
30
1,549
1,918
87
86
—
335
—
36
487
2,303
(296)
227
(418)
5
(1,005)
(60)
(1,472)
779
(2,240)
—
(11)
(25)
—
(36)
(5)
22
1,527
$
1,579
$
1,549
$
1,171
(7)
1,164
1,523
(5)
97
—
355
—
9
(231)
2,912
(355)
376
(902)
—
(2,217)
(226)
(250)
550
(3,024)
9
(2)
(156)
—
(149)
(3)
(264)
1,791
1,527
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
1. BLACKBERRY LIMITED AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
BlackBerry Limited, formerly Research In Motion Limited, (the "Company") is a global leader in wireless innovation.
Through the development of integrated hardware, software and services that support multiple wireless network standards,
the Company provides platforms and solutions for seamless access to information, including email, voice, instant
messaging, short message service, internet and intranet-based applications and browsing. The Company’s technology also
enables a broad array of third party developers and manufacturers to enhance their products and services through software
development kits, wireless connectivity to data and third-party support programs. The Company’s portfolio of award-
winning products, services and embedded technologies are used by thousands of organizations and millions of consumers
around the world and include the BlackBerry® wireless solution, the BlackBerry Wireless Handheld™ product line,
software development tools and other software and hardware. The Company’s sales and marketing efforts include
collaboration with strategic partners and distribution channels, as well as its own supporting sales and marketing teams, to
promote the sale of its products and services. The Company was incorporated on March 7, 1984 under the Ontario
Business Corporations Act. The Company’s shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “BB” and
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BBRY”.
Basis of presentation and preparation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries of the Company with intercompany
transactions and balances eliminated on consolidation. All of the Company’s subsidiaries are wholly-owned. These
consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) on a basis consistent for all periods presented except as described in note 2. Certain
of the comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
The Company’s fiscal year end date is the 52 or 53 weeks ending on the last Saturday of February, or the first Saturday of
March. The fiscal years ending March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013 comprise 52 weeks and the fiscal year ended March 3,
2012 comprises 53 weeks.
Accounting Policies
The significant accounting policies used in these U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements are as follows:
Foreign currency translation
The U.S. dollar is the functional and reporting currency of the Company. Foreign currency denominated assets and
liabilities of the Company and all of its subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars. Accordingly, monetary assets and
liabilities are translated using the exchange rates in effect at the consolidated balance sheets dates and revenues and
expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing when the transactions occurred. Remeasurement adjustments
are included in income. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical exchange rates.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of balances with banks and liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at
the date of acquisition.
Accounts receivable, net
The accounts receivable balance reflects invoiced and accrued revenue and is presented net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects estimates of probable losses in the accounts receivable balance.
The Company is dependent on a number of significant customers and on large complex contracts with respect to the
majority of its products, software and service revenues. The Company expects the majority of its accounts receivable
balances to continue to come from large customers as it sells the majority of its devices, software products and services
through network carriers and resellers rather than directly.
The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable balance based upon a combination of factors on a
periodic basis such as specific credit risk of its customers, historical trends and economic circumstances. The Company, in
the normal course of business, monitors the financial condition of its customers and reviews the credit history of each new
customer. When the Company becomes aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to the
Company (such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or material deterioration in the customer’s operating results or
financial position, and payment experiences), the Company records a specific bad debt provision to reduce the customer’s
1
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
related accounts receivable to its estimated net realizable value. If circumstances related to specific customers change, the
Company’s estimates of the recoverability of accounts receivables balances could be further adjusted.
Investments
The Company’s cash equivalents and investments, other than cost method and equity method investments consist of
money market and other debt securities, which are classified as available-for-sale for accounting purposes and are carried
at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of related income taxes, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income until such investments mature or are sold. The Company uses the specific identification method of determining
the cost basis in computing realized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments, which are recorded in investment
income. In the event of a decline in value which is other-than-temporary, the investment is written down to fair value with
a charge to income. The Company does not exercise significant influence with respect to any of these investments.
Investments with maturities at time of purchase of three months or less, are classified as cash equivalents. Investments
with maturities of one year or less (but which are not cash equivalents), as well as any investments that management
intends to hold for less than one year, are classified as short-term investments. Investments with maturities in excess of
one year are classified as long-term investments.
The Company assesses individual investments that are in an unrealized loss position to determine whether the unrealized
loss is other-than-temporary. The Company makes this assessment by considering available evidence, including changes
in general market conditions, specific industry and individual company data, the length of time and the extent to which the
fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition, the near-term prospects of the individual investment and the
Company’s intent and ability to hold the investment. In the event that a decline in the fair value of an investment occurs
and that decline in value is considered to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded in investment income
equal to the difference between the cost basis and the fair value of the individual investment at the consolidated balance
sheets date of the reporting period for which the assessment was made. The fair value of the investment then becomes the
new cost basis of the investment.
If a debt security’s market value is below its amortized cost and the Company either intends to sell the security or it is
more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery, the Company
records an other-than-temporary impairment charge to investment income for the entire amount of the impairment. For
other-than-temporary impairments on debt securities that the Company does not intend to sell and it is not more likely
than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery, the Company would separate
the other-than-temporary impairment into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other
factors. The Company would record the other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss as a charge to
investment income and the remaining other-than-temporary impairment would be recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income.
Derivative financial instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments, including forward contracts and options, to hedge certain foreign
currency exposures. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
The Company records all derivative instruments at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of these
instruments is calculated based on notional and exercise values, transaction rates, market quoted currency spot rates,
forward points, volatilities and interest rate yield curves. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
depends on the intended use of the derivative instrument and the resulting designation.
For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially
reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, and subsequently reclassified into
income in the same period or periods in which the hedged item affects income. The ineffective portion of the derivative’s
gain or loss is recognized in current income. In order for the Company to receive hedge accounting treatment, the cash
flow hedge must be highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item and the relationship between
the hedging instrument and the associated hedged item must be formally documented at the inception of the hedge
relationship. Hedge effectiveness is formally assessed, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, to determine
whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the value of the hedged
items and whether they are expected to continue to be highly effective in future periods.
The Company formally documents relationships between hedging instruments and associated hedged items. This
documentation includes: identification of the specific foreign currency asset, liability or forecasted transaction being
hedged; the nature of the risk being hedged; the hedge objective; and the method of assessing hedge effectiveness. If an
2
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
anticipated transaction is deemed no longer likely to occur, the corresponding derivative instrument is de-designated as a
hedge and any associated unrealized gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income are recognized in
income at that time. Any future changes in the fair value of the instrument are recognized in current income.
For any derivative instruments that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting, or for any derivative instruments
for which hedge accounting is not elected, the changes in fair value of the instruments are recognized in income in the
current period and will generally offset the changes in the U.S. dollar value of the associated asset, liability or forecasted
transaction.
Inventories
Raw materials, work in process and finished goods are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost includes the cost
of materials plus direct labour applied to the product and the applicable share of manufacturing overhead. Cost is
determined on a first-in-first-out basis. Market is generally considered to be replacement cost; however, market is not
permitted to exceed the ceiling (net realizable value) or be less than the floor (net realizable value less a normal markup).
Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable
costs of completion and disposal.
Property, plant and equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. No amortization is provided for
construction in progress until the assets are ready for use. Amortization is provided using the following rates and methods:
Buildings, leasehold improvements and other
BlackBerry operations and other information technology
Manufacturing equipment, research and development
equipment and tooling
Furniture and fixtures
Straight-line over terms between 5 and 40 years
Straight-line over terms between 3 and 5 years
Straight-line over terms between 1 and 8 years
Declining balance at 20% per annum
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is
allocated at the date of the business combination. Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment annually, during
the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the asset may be impaired. These
events and circumstances may include a significant change in legal factors or in the business climate, a significant decline
in the Company’s share price, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, a loss of key
personnel, significant disposal activity and the testing of recoverability for a significant asset group.
The Company consists of a single reporting unit. The impairment test is carried out in two steps. In the first step, the
carrying amount of the reporting unit including goodwill is compared with its fair value. The estimated fair value is
determined utilizing a market-based approach, based on the quoted market price of the Company’s stock in an active
market, adjusted by an appropriate control premium. When the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
goodwill of the reporting unit is considered to be impaired and the second step is necessary. In the second step, the
implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is compared with its carrying amount to measure the amount of the
impairment loss, if any.
The Company's entire goodwill balance was written off in fiscal 2013.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets with definite lives are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. The Company is currently amortizing
its intangible assets with finite lives over periods generally ranging between two to ten years.
The useful lives of intangible assets are evaluated quarterly to determine if events or circumstances warrant a revision to
their remaining period of amortization. Legal, regulatory and contractual factors, the effects of obsolescence, demand,
competition and other economic factors are potential indicators that the useful life of an intangible asset may be revised.
Impairment of long-lived assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets ("LLA") such as property, plant and equipment and intangible assets with finite
useful lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset or
3
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
asset group may not be recoverable. These events and circumstances may include significant decreases in the market price
of an asset or asset group, significant changes in the extent or manner in which an asset or asset group is being used by the
Company or in its physical condition, a significant change in legal factors or in the business climate, a history or forecast
of future operating or cash flow losses, significant disposal activity, a significant decline in the Company's share price, a
significant decline in revenues or adverse changes in the economic environment.
When significant indicators of impairment exist, LLA impairment is tested using a two-step process. The Company
performs a cash flow recoverability test as the first step, which involves comparing the Company's estimated
undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying amount of its net assets, since the Company consists of one asset group. If
the net cash flows of the Company exceed the carrying amount of its net assets, LLA are not considered to be impaired. If
the carrying amount exceeds the net cash flows, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step of the
LLA impairment test is performed to measure the impairment amount. The second step involves determining the fair
value of the asset group, the Company. Fair value should be determined using valuation techniques that are in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, including the market approach, income approach and cost approach. If the carrying amount of the
Company's net assets exceeds the fair value of the Company, then the excess represents the maximum amount of potential
impairment that will be allocated to the Company's assets on a relative basis, with the limitation that the carrying value of
each asset cannot be reduced to a value lower that its fair value. The total impairment amount allocated is recognized as a
non-cash impairment loss.
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations
When certain criteria are met, the Company reclassifies assets and related liabilities as held for sale at the lower of their
carrying value or fair value less costs to sell and, if material, presents them separately on the Company’s consolidated
balance sheets. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value less costs to sell, a loss is recognized. If the plan to sell an asset
includes a leaseback arrangement for which the Company will retain more than a minor portion of the use of the asset,
then the asset is not reclassifed as held for sale as all criteria are deemed not to have been met. Assets classified as held
for sale are no longer amortized. Comparative figures are reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
When the Company has disposed of or classified as held for sale a component of the entity, and certain criteria are met,
the results of operations of the component, including any loss recognized, are reported separately on the consolidated
statements of operations as discontinued operations. Discontinued operations are presented if the component’s operations
and cash flows have been, or will be, eliminated from the Company and the Company will not have significant continuing
involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal. Earnings (loss) per share amounts for both continuing
operations and discontinued operations are presented separately on the consolidated statements of operations and income
(loss) from continuing operations and loss from discontinued operations are reported separately on the consolidated
statements of cash flows. Comparative figures are reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
Royalties
The Company recognizes its liability for royalties in accordance with the terms of existing license agreements. Where
license agreements are not yet finalized, the Company recognizes its current estimates of the obligation in accrued
liabilities in the Consolidated Financial Statements. When the license agreements are subsequently finalized, the estimate
is revised accordingly. Management’s estimates of royalty rates are based on the Company’s historical licensing activities,
royalty payment experience and forward-looking expectations.
Warranty
The Company records the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. BlackBerry devices are
generally covered by a time-limited warranty for varying periods of time. The Company’s warranty obligation is affected
by product failure rates, differences in warranty periods, regulatory developments with respect to warranty obligations in
the countries in which the Company carries on business, freight expense, and material usage and other related repair costs.
The Company’s estimates of costs are based upon historical experience and expectations of future return rates and unit
warranty repair costs. If the Company experiences increased or decreased warranty activity, or increased or decreased
costs associated with servicing those obligations, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be recognized in the
reporting period when such revisions are made.
Convertible Debentures
The Company elected to measure the convertible debentures at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. Each
period, the fair value of the convertible debentures will be recalculated and resulting gains and losses from the change in
fair value of the convertible debentures will be recognized in income.
4
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
Revenue Recognition
The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when the following four criteria have been met: (i)
when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been delivered to a customer and title has been
transferred or the services have been rendered, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collection is
reasonably assured. In addition to this general policy, the following paragraphs describe the specific revenue recognition
policies for each of the Company’s major categories of revenue.
Hardware
Revenue for hardware products is recognized when the four criteria noted above are met. The determination of when the
price is fixed or determinable can affect the timing of revenue recognition, as discussed further below.
The Company records reductions to revenue for estimated commitments related to price protection, rights of return and
customer incentive programs. Price protection is accrued as a reduction to revenue provided that the future price reduction
can be reliably estimated or based on contractual caps, provided that the Company has not granted refunds in excess of
those caps and provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. If refunds cannot be reliably estimated
or the contractual cap is no longer valid, revenue is not recognized until reliable estimates can be made or the price
protection period lapses. The Company also records reductions to revenue for rights of return based on contractual terms
and conditions as it relates to quality defects only and, if the expected product returns can be reasonably and reliably
estimated, based on historical experience. Where a right of return cannot be reasonably and reliably estimated, the
Company recognizes revenue when the product sells through to an end user or the return period lapses. The estimated cost
of customer incentive programs is accrued as a reduction to revenue and is recognized at the later of the date at which the
Company has recognized the revenue or the date at which the program is offered. If historical experience cannot support a
breakage rate, the maximum rebate amount is accrued and adjusted when the incentive programs end. The Company
considers several factors in determining whether it can reliably estimate future refunds or customer incentives such as
levels of channel inventory, new competitor introductions, the stage of a product in the product life cycle, and potential
cannibalization of future product offerings. If there is a future risk of pricing concessions and a reliable estimate cannot be
made at the time of shipment, the Company recognizes the related revenue and costs of goods sold when its products are
sold through to an end user. Shipments of BlackBerry 10 devices, and BlackBerry 7 devices in certain regions, are
recognized as revenue when the devices sell through to end customers.
For shipments where the Company recognizes revenue when the product is sold through to an end user, the Company
determines the point at which that happens based upon internally generated reporting indicating when the devices are
activated on the Company’s relay infrastructure.
Service
Revenue from service is recognized ratably on a monthly basis when the service is provided. In instances where the
Company bills the customer prior to performing the service, the prebilling is recorded as deferred revenue. Service
revenue also includes the recognition of previously deferred revenue related to multi-element arrangements for non-
software services and software upgrade rights related to BlackBerry 10 devices.
Software
Revenue from licensed software is recognized at the inception of the license term and in accordance with industry-specific
software revenue recognition accounting guidance. When the fair value of a delivered element has not been established,
the Company uses the residual method to recognize revenue if the fair value of undelivered elements is determinable.
Revenue from software maintenance, unspecified upgrades and technical support contracts is recognized over the period
that such items are delivered or those services are provided.
Other
Other revenue consists of the sale of accessories and repair and maintenance contracts. Revenue is recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and
collection is probable.
5
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
Shipping and Handling Costs
Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are classified as revenue, and the Company’s shipping and
handling costs are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs that cannot be reasonably attributed to certain
customers are included in selling, marketing and administration.
Multiple-Element Arrangements
The Company enters into revenue arrangements that may consist of multiple deliverables of its product and service
offerings. The Company’s typical multiple-element arrangements involve: (i) BlackBerry 7 or earlier handheld devices
with services, (ii) BlackBerry 10 handheld devices with unspecified software upgrades on a when-and-if available basis
along with undelivered non-software services, and (iii) software with technical support services.
For the Company’s arrangements involving multiple deliverables of BlackBerry 7 or earlier handheld devices with
services, the consideration from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative selling price,
using vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”). In certain limited instances when the Company is
unable to establish the selling price using VSOE, the Company attempts to establish the selling price of each element
based on acceptable third party evidence of selling price (“TPE”); however, the Company is generally unable to reliably
determine the selling prices of similar competitor products and services on a stand-alone basis. In these instances, the
Company uses best estimated selling price (“BESP”) in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of
BESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the product or service was sold on a stand-
alone basis.
Beginning in January 2013, the Company introduced its BlackBerry 10 devices which use the Company’s network
infrastructure in a different manner than BlackBerry 7 or earlier devices. As a result, for arrangements involving multiple
deliverables including the BlackBerry 10 device and the essential operating system software, as well as unspecified
software upgrade rights and non-software services for which the Company may not charge for separately, the
consideration from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on the relative selling price, using the
Company’s BESP as the device, unspecified upgrade rights and non-software services are no longer sold separately. The
consideration for the delivered hardware and the related essential operating system software are recognized at the time of
sale provided that the four general revenue recognition criteria have been met. The consideration allocated to the
unspecified software upgrade rights and non-software services is deferred and recognized ratably over the 24-month
estimated life of the devices.
For arrangements involving multiple deliverables of software with technical support services, the revenue is recognized
based on the industry-specific software revenue recognition accounting guidance. If the Company is not able to determine
VSOE for all of the deliverables of the arrangement, but is able to obtain VSOE for all undelivered elements, revenue is
allocated using the residual method. Under the residual method, the amount of revenue allocated to delivered elements
equals the total arrangement consideration less the aggregate fair value of any undelivered elements. If VSOE of any
undelivered software items does not exist, revenue from the entire arrangement is initially deferred and recognized at the
earlier of: (i) delivery of those elements for which VSOE did not exist; or (ii) when VSOE can be established.
The Company determines BESP for a product or service by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to,
historical pricing practices for similar offerings, market conditions, competitive landscape, internal costs, gross margin
objectives and pricing practices. The determination of BESP is made through consultation with and formal approval by,
the Company’s management, taking into consideration the Company’s marketing strategy. The Company regularly
reviews VSOE, TPE and BESP, and maintains internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates.
Based on the above factors, the Company’s BESP for the unspecified software upgrade right and non-software services
ranges from $10-$20 per BlackBerry 10 device.
Income taxes
The Company uses the liability method of income tax allocation to account for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets
and liabilities are recognized based upon temporary differences between the financial reporting and income tax bases of
assets and liabilities, and measured using enacted income tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are
expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that
is more likely than not to be realized. The Company considers both positive evidence and negative evidence, to determine
whether, based upon the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is required. Judgment is required in considering
the relative impact of negative and positive evidence.
Significant judgment is also required in evaluating the Company’s uncertain income tax positions and provisions for
income taxes. Liabilities for uncertain income tax positions are recognized based on a two-step approach. The first step is
6
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
to evaluate whether an income tax position has met the recognition threshold by determining if the weight of available
evidence indicates that it is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. The second step is to measure the
income tax position that has met the recognition threshold as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being
realized upon settlement. The Company continually assesses the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and
adjusts the income tax provisions, income taxes payable and deferred income taxes in the period in which the facts that
give rise to a revision become known. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax
positions as interest expense, which is then netted and reported within investment income.
The Company uses the flow-through method to account for investment tax credits (“ITCs”) earned on eligible scientific
research and experimental development expenditures. Under this method, the ITCs are recognized as a reduction to
income tax expense.
Research and development
Research costs are expensed as incurred. Development costs for BlackBerry devices and licensed software to be sold,
leased or otherwise marketed are subject to capitalization beginning when a product’s technological feasibility has been
established and ending when a product is available for general release to customers. The Company’s products are
generally released soon after technological feasibility has been established and therefore costs incurred subsequent to
achievement of technological feasibility are not significant and have been expensed as incurred.
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in net assets of a business enterprise during a period from transactions
and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources and includes all changes in equity during a period except
those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The Company’s reportable items of
comprehensive income are cash flow hedges as described in Note 15 and changes in the fair value of available-for-sale
investments as described in Note 4. Realized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments are reclassified into
investment income using the specific identification basis.
Earnings (loss) per share
Earnings (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
year. The treasury stock method is used for the calculation of the dilutive effect of stock options.
Stock-based compensation plans
The Company has stock-based compensation plans, which are described in Note 9(b) to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”) was adopted during fiscal 2014 and replaced the previous Equity
Incentive Plan and Restricted Share Unit Plan (the "Prior Plans”). Awards previously granted under the Prior Plans will
continue to be governed by the terms of the Prior Plans and by any amendments approved by the Company's Board of
Directors. The 2014 Plan provides for the grants of incentive stock options and restricted share units ("RSUs") to officers
and employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. The number of common shares authorized under the 2014 Plan was
13,375,000 calculated at March 2, 2013. Any shares that are subject to options granted after fiscal 2013 will be counted
against this limit as 0.625 share for every one option granted, and any shares that are subject to RSUs granted after fiscal
2013 will be counted against this limit as one share for every RSU. Awards previously granted under the Prior Plans and
the 2014 Plan that are forfeited, expire or settled in cash, will be added to the shares available under the 2014 Plan.
Options forfeited will be counted as 0.625 shares to the shares available under the 2014 Plan. Shares issued as awards
other than options (i.e., RSUs) forfeited, expire, settled in cash or sold to cover withholding tax requirements shall be
counted as one share added to the shares available under the 2014 Plan. In addition to awards under the 2014 Plan,
10,521,418 RSUs were granted to Mr. Chen as an inducement to enter into a contract of full time employment.
The Company measures stock-based compensation expense at the grant date based on the award’s fair value as calculated
by the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model for stock options and is recognized rateably over the vesting
period. The BSM model requires various judgmental assumptions including volatility and expected option life. In
addition, judgment is also applied in estimating the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited, and if
actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations
would be impacted.
Any consideration paid by employees on exercise of stock options plus any recorded stock-based compensation within
additional paid-in capital related to that stock option is credited to capital stock.
7
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
At the Company’s discretion, RSUs are redeemed for either common shares issued by the Company, common shares
purchased on the open market by a trustee selected by the Company or the cash equivalent on the vesting dates established
by the Board of Directors or the Compensation, Nomination and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. The
RSUs generally vest over a three-year period, either on the third anniversary date, in equal installments or 25% per year in
years one and two and 50% in year three, 50% in year two and three or over a five-year period, 25% per year in year 3 and
4 and 50% in year 5 on each anniversary date over the vesting period. For RSUs granted on performance, the Company
estimates its achievement against the performance goals which are based on the Company’s business plan approved by the
Board of Directors. The estimated achievement is updated for the Company’s outlook for the fiscal year as at the end of
each fiscal quarter. Compensation cost will only be recognized to the extent that performance goals are achieved. The
Company classifies RSUs as equity instruments as the Company has the ability and intent to settle the awards in common
shares. The compensation expense is calculated based on the fair value of each RSU as determined by the closing value
of the Company’s common shares on the business day of the grant date. The Company recognizes compensation expense
over the vesting period of the RSU.
Upon issuance of RSUs common shares for which RSUs may be exchanged will either be purchased on the open market
by a trustee selected and funded by the Company or new common shares will be issued by the Company. The trustee has
been appointed to settle the Company’s obligation to deliver shares to individuals upon vesting. In addition, upon vesting,
the trustee is required to sell enough shares to cover the individual recipient’s minimum statutory withholding tax
requirement, with the remaining shares delivered to the individual. As the Company is considered to be the primary
beneficiary of the trust, the trust is considered a variable interest entity and is consolidated by the Company.
The Company has a Deferred Share Unit Plan (the “DSU Plan”), adopted by the Board of Directors on December 20,
2007, under which each independent director will be credited with Deferred Share Units (“DSUs”) in satisfaction of all or
a portion of the cash fees otherwise payable to them for serving as a director of the Company. Grants under the DSU Plan
replace the stock option awards that were historically granted to independent members of the Board of Directors. At a
minimum, 60% of each independent director’s annual retainer will be satisfied in the form of DSUs. The director can elect
to receive the remaining 40% in any combination of cash and DSUs. Within a specified period after such a director ceases
to be a director, DSUs will be redeemed for cash with the redemption value of each DSU equal to the weighted average
trading price of the Company’s shares over the five trading days preceding the redemption date. Alternatively, subject to
receipt of shareholder approval, the Company may elect to redeem DSUs by way of shares purchased on the open market
or issued by the Company.
DSUs are accounted for as liability-classified awards and are awarded on a quarterly basis. These awards are measured at
their fair value on the date of issuance and re-measured at each reporting period until settlement.
Advertising costs
The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred. These costs are included in selling, marketing and
administration.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Use of estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions with
respect to the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to the determination of reserves for various
litigation claims, provisions for excess and obsolete inventories and liabilities for purchase commitments with contract
manufacturers and suppliers, provisions for warranty, revenue related estimates including VSOE, BESP, right of return
and customer incentive commitments, royalties, implied fair value of goodwill, long-lived asset impairment, amortization
expense, fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, provision for income taxes,
realization of deferred income tax assets and the related components of the valuation allowance, allowance for doubtful
accounts, and the fair values of financial instruments. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Inventory and Inventory Purchase Commitments
The Company’s policy for the valuation of inventory, including the determination of obsolete or excess inventory, requires
management to estimate the future demand for the Company’s products. Inventory purchases and purchase commitments
are based upon such forecasts of future demand and scheduled rollout and life cycles of new products. The business
environment in which the Company operates is subject to rapid changes in technology and customer demand. The
8
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
Company performs an assessment of inventory during each reporting period, which includes a review of, among other
factors, demand requirements, component part purchase commitments of the Company and certain key suppliers, product
life cycle and development plans, component cost trends, product pricing and quality issues. If customer demand
subsequently differs from the Company’s forecasts, requirements for inventory write-offs that differ from the Company’s
estimates could become necessary. If management believes that demand no longer allows the Company to sell inventories
above cost or at all, such inventory is written down to net realizable value or excess inventory is written off.
During fiscal 2014, the Company shipped devices to its carrier and distributor partners to support new and continuing
product launches and meet expected levels of end customer demand. However, the sell-through levels for BlackBerry 10
smartphones decreased significantly during fiscal 2014 due to the maturing smartphone market, very intense competition
and, the Company believes, the uncertainty created by the Company's recently completed strategic review process. These
factors caused the number of BlackBerry 10 devices in the channel to increase above the Company's expectations, which
in turn caused the Company to reassess and revise its future demand assumptions for finished products, semi-finished
goods and raw materials. The Company also made the decision to cancel plans to launch two devices to mitigate the
identified inventory risk. Based on these revised demand assumptions, the Company recorded primarily non-cash, pre-tax
charges against inventory and supply commitments of approximately $2.4 billion in fiscal 2014 related to Blackberry 10
devices.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
The LLA impairment test prescribed by U.S. GAAP requires the Company to identify its asset groups and test impairment
of each asset group separately. To conduct the LLA impairment test, the asset group is tested for recoverability using
undiscounted cash flows over the remaining useful life of the primary asset. If forecasted net cash flows are less than the
carrying amount of the asset group, an impairment charge is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset group to its
carrying value. Determining the Company's asset groups and related primary assets requires significant judgment by
management. Different judgments could yield different results.
During fiscal 2014, the Company experienced a significant decline in its share price following its pre-release of its second
quarter fiscal 2014 results on September 20, 2013, as well as its announcement on November 4, 2013 that Fairfax
Financial Holdings Limited ("Fairfax") and other institutional investors (collectively, the “Purchasers”) were investing in
the Company through the $1.0 billion private placement of convertible debentures (the "Debentures") in lieu of finalizing
the purchase of the Company as contemplated in the previously-announced letter of intent. The Company further
identified the continuing decline in revenues, the generation of operating losses and the decrease in cash flows from
operations as indicators of potential long-lived asset (“LLA”) impairment. Further, the Company believes that its recently
completed strategic review process may have increased market uncertainty as to the future viability of the Company and
may have negatively impacted demand for the Company's products. Accordingly, a cash flow recoverability test was
performed as of November 4, 2013 (the “Measurement Date”). The estimated undiscounted net cash flows were
determined utilizing the Company's internal forecast and incorporated a terminal value of the Company utilizing its
market capitalization, calculated as the number of the Company's common shares outstanding as at the interim testing date
by the average market price of the shares over a 10 day period following the Measurement Date. The Company used this
duration in order to incorporate the inherent market fluctuations that may affect any individual closing price of the
Company's shares. As a result, the Company concluded that the carrying value of its net assets exceeded the undiscounted
net cash flows as at the Measurement Date. Consequently, step two of the LLA impairment test was performed whereby
the fair values of the Company's assets were compared to their carrying values. As a result, the Company recorded a non-
cash, pre-tax charge against its LLA (the “LLA Impairment Charge”) of $2.7 billion in fiscal 2014.
9
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
Valuation Allowance Against Deferred Tax Assets
The Company regularly assesses the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance
is required for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the asset will not be realized. All
available evidence, both positive and negative, that may affect the realization of deferred tax assets must be identified and
considered in determining the appropriate amount of the valuation allowance. Additionally, for interim periods, the
estimated annual effective tax rate should include the valuation allowance for current year changes in temporary
differences and losses or income arising during the year. For interim periods, the Company needs to consider the
valuation allowance that it expects to recognize at the end of the fiscal year as part of the estimated annual effective tax
rate. During interim quarters, the Company uses estimates including pre-tax results and ending position of temporary
differences as at the end of the fiscal year to estimate the valuation allowance that it expects to recognize at the end of the
fiscal year. This accounting treatment has no effect on the Company’s actual ability to utilize deferred tax assets to reduce
future cash tax payments. Different judgments could yield different results.
Revenue Recognition
Significant judgment is applied by the Company to determine whether shipments of devices have met the Company’s
revenue recognition criteria, as the analysis is dependent on many facts and circumstances. During fiscal 2014, the
Company shipped devices to its carrier and distributor partners to support new and continuing product launches and meet
expected levels of end customer demand. However, the sell-through levels for BlackBerry 10 devices decreased during
fiscal 2014, causing the number of BlackBerry 10 devices in the channel to increase above the Company's expectations. In
order to improve sell-through levels and stimulate global demand for BlackBerry 10 devices, the Company continued to
execute on sell-through programs and reduced the price on new shipments of BlackBerry 10 smartphones during fiscal
2014. The Company plans to implement further sell-through programs with its carrier and distributor partners, which
could be applicable to BlackBerry 10 devices shipped in fiscal 2014. As previously disclosed, the Company can no longer
reasonably estimate the amount of the potential sell-through programs that may be offered on certain BlackBerry devices
in future periods, resulting in revenues for BlackBerry 10 devices, and BlackBerry 7 devices in certain regions, being
recognized when the devices sell through to end customers.
2. ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance to improve the reporting of
reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”). The guidance requires an entity to
present changes in AOCI by component and report the effect of significant reclassifications out of AOCI on the respective
line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to
net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in
the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that
provide additional detail about those amounts. The new authoritative guidance became effective for annual and interim
reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this
guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. As a result, the Company presents, by component, changes in AOCI and the
effect of significant reclassifications out of AOCI on the respective line items in net income in Note 14.
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance to eliminate diversity in practice
related to the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a
similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The guidance requires that under certain circumstances, an
unrecognized tax benefit is to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset as opposed to
being presented as a liability. The new authoritative guidance will become effective for fiscal years and interim reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption and retrospective application permitted. The Company
adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. As a result, the Company has presented the unrecognized tax
benefit as a reduction to the deferred tax asset in the consolidated balance sheets.
10
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
3. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS
The components of cash, cash equivalents and investments were as follows:
Cost Basis
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Other-than-
temporary
Impairment
Cash and
Cash
Equivalents
Fair Value
Short-term
Investments
Long-term
Investments
$
708
$
— $
— $
708
$
708
$
— $
As at March 1, 2014
Bank balances
Bankers’ acceptances/
Bearer deposit notes
Commercial paper
U.S. treasury bills/
notes
Non-U.S. treasury bills/
notes
Non-U.S. government
sponsored enterprise
notes
Corporate notes/bonds
Auction-rate securities
Other investments
As at March 2, 2013
Bank balances
Money market funds
Bankers’ acceptances/
Bearer deposit notes
Non-U.S. government
promissory notes
Term deposits/
certificates
Commercial paper
Non-U.S. treasury bills/
notes
U.S. treasury bills/
notes
U.S. government
sponsored enterprise
notes
Non-U.S. government
sponsored enterprise
notes
Corporate notes/bonds
Asset-backed securities
Auction rate securities
Other investments
$
$
$
$
392
15
879
480
55
4
41
89
2,663
431
5
114
50
157
629
282
619
156
26
217
102
41
50
$
2,879
$
$
$
$
$
332
15
253
241
30
—
—
—
1,579
431
5
114
50
132
534
233
—
10
26
14
—
—
—
431
5
114
50
157
629
282
619
156
26
218
102
36
50
—
—
—
—
—
—
4
36
89
60
—
626
239
25
—
—
—
950
$
129
— $
—
—
—
25
95
49
602
146
—
186
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17
—
—
18
100
36
50
2,875
$
1,549
$
1,105
$
221
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
(6)
—
(6) $
392
15
879
480
55
4
36
89
2,658
$
— $
— $
— $
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(6)
—
(6) $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
1
—
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
— $
11
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
As at March 1, 2014, the Company's other investments consisted of cost method investments of $4 million (March 2,
2013 -$4 million) and equity method investments of $85 million (March 2, 2013 -$46 million).
Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities comprise the following:
Realized gains
Realized losses
Net realized gains
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
$
$
— $
—
— $
11
—
11
$
$
1
—
1
The contractual maturities of available-for-sale investments as at March 1, 2014 were as follows:
Due in one year or less
Due in one to five years
Due after five years
Cost Basis
Fair Value
1,821
$
1,821
4
35
4
36
1,860
$
1,861
$
$
As at March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, the Company had no investments with continuous unrealized losses.
The Company engages in limited securities lending to generate fee income. Collateral, which exceeds the market value of
the loaned securities, is retained by the Company until the underlying security has been returned to the Company. As at
March 1, 2014, the Company had loaned securities (which are included in short-term investments) with a market value of
approximately $100 million (March 2, 2013 - nil) consisting of non-U.S. treasury bills/notes, to major Canadian banks.
The Company holds collateral with a market value that exceeds the value of securities lent, consisting of non-U.S.
treasury bills/notes issued by the federal and provincial governments of Canada.
In valuing the auction rate securities, the Company used a multi-year investment horizon and considered the underlying
risk of the securities and the current market interest rate environment. The Company has the ability and intent to hold
these securities until such time that market liquidity returns to normal levels, and does not consider the principal or
interest amounts on these securities to be materially at risk. As there is uncertainty as to when market liquidity for auction
rate securities will return to normal, the Company has classified the auction rate securities as long-term investments on the
consolidated balance sheets as at March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013.
4.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements
for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous
market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability such as inherent risk, non-performance risk and credit risk. The Company applies the following fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value into three levels:
• Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
• Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
• Level 3 - Significant unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The fair value hierarchy also requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
12
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, other receivables, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
In determining the fair value of investments held, the Company primarily relies on an independent third party valuator for
the fair valuation of securities. Pricing inputs used by the independent third party valuator are generally received from two
primary vendors. The pricing inputs are reviewed for completeness and accuracy, within a set tolerance level, on a daily
basis by the independent third party valuator. The Company also reviews and understands the inputs used in the valuation
process and assesses the pricing of the securities for reasonableness.
For cash equivalents, the independent third party valuator utilizes amortized cost, as the short-term nature of the securities
approximates fair value. For short-term and long-term investments, the independent third party valuator provides fair
values determined from quoted prices that it obtains from vendors. The Company then corroborates the fair values
received from the independent third party valuator for its investment portfolio against the results of its own internal
collection of quoted prices from brokers in order to assess the reasonability of the pricing provided by the independent
third party valuator.
The bankers’ acceptances/bearer deposit notes and term deposits/certificates held by the Company are all issued by major
banking organization and have investment grade ratings.
The U.S. treasury bills/notes held by the Company are issued by the United States Department of the Treasury and have
investment grade ratings.
The non-U.S. treasury bills/notes held by the Company are issued by the Federal or Provincial governments of Canada
and have investment grade ratings.
The non-U.S. government sponsored enterprise notes held by the Company are primarily issued by investment banks
backed by countries across the globe and all have investment grade ratings.
Fair values for all investment categories provided by the independent third party valuator that are in excess of 0.5% from
the fair values determined by the Company are communicated to the independent third party valuator for consideration of
reasonableness. The independent third party valuator considers the information provided by the Company before
determining whether a change in the original pricing is warranted.
The fair values of corporate notes/bonds classified as Level 3, which represent investments in securities for which there is
not an active market, are estimated using a discounted cash flow pricing methodology incorporating unobservable inputs
such as anticipated monthly interest and principal payments received, existing and estimated defaults, and collateral value.
The corporate notes/bonds classified as Level 3 held by the Company consist of securities received in a payment-in-kind
distribution from a former structured investment vehicle. The fair value of auction rate securities is estimated using a
discounted cash flow model incorporating estimated weighted-average lives based on contractual terms, assumptions
concerning liquidity, and credit adjustments of the security sponsor to determine timing and amount of future cash flows.
Some of these inputs are unobservable.
The fair values of currency forward contracts and currency option contracts have been determined using notional and
exercise values, transaction rates, market quoted currency spot rates, forward points, volatilities and interest rate yield
curves. For currency forward contracts and currency option contracts, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. Changes in assumptions could
have a significant effect on the estimates.
The fair value of the Company’s convertible debenture has been determined using the significant inputs of principal value,
interest rate spreads and curves, embedded call option dates and prices, the stock price and volatility of the Company’s
listed common shares, and the Company’s implicit credit spread.
13
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
As at March 1, 2014
Assets
Available-for-sale investments
Bankers’ acceptances
Term deposits/certificates
U.S. treasury bills/notes
Non-U.S. treasury bills/notes
Non-U.S. government sponsored enterprise notes
Corporate notes/bonds
Auction rate securities
Total available-for-sale investments
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Total assets
Liabilities
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Convertible debentures
Total liabilities
As at March 2, 2013
Assets
Available-for-sale investments
Money market funds
Bankers’ acceptances/Bearer deposit notes
Non-U.S. government promissory notes
Term deposits/certificates
Commercial paper
Non-U.S. treasury bills/notes
U.S. treasury bills/notes
U.S. government sponsored enterprise notes
Non-U.S. government sponsored enterprise notes
Corporate notes/bonds
Asset-backed securities
Auction rate securities
Total available-for-sale investments
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Total assets
Liabilities
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Total liabilities
14
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
392
15
879
480
55
4
36
1,861
5
2
1,868
26
2
1,627
1,655
5
114
50
157
629
282
619
156
26
218
102
36
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
$
— $
392
$
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
— $
—
—
— $
15
879
480
55
—
—
1,821
5
2
1,828
26
2
1,627
1,655
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
4
36
40
—
—
40
$
— $
—
—
— $
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
$
— $
— $
5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5
—
—
5
114
50
157
629
282
619
156
26
213
102
—
2,348
57
2
$
2,407
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5
—
36
41
—
—
41
2,394
57
2
$
2,453
$
$
$
— $
—
— $
24
11
35
— $
—
— $
24
11
35
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets for the years ended March 2,
2013 and March 1, 2014:
Balance at March 3, 2012
Sale of Level 3 assets
Principal payments
Balance at March 2, 2013
Principal repayments
Balance at March 1, 2014
Level 3
68
(25)
(2)
41
(1)
40
$
$
The Company recognizes transfers in and out of levels within the fair value hierarchy at the end of the reporting period in
which the actual event or change in circumstance occurred. There were no significant transfers in or out of Level 3 assets
during the year ended March 1, 2014 ($25 million transferred out of Level 3 assets representing the sale of the Company’s
unsecured claim on assets held at Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (“LBIE”) at the time of LBIE’s bankruptcy for
the year ended March 2, 2013).
The Company’s Level 3 assets measured on a recurring basis include auction rate securities as well as corporate notes/
bonds consisting of securities received in a payment-in-kind distribution from a former structured investment vehicle.
The auction rate securities are valued using a discounted cash flow method incorporating both observable and
unobservable inputs. The unobservable inputs utilized in the valuation are the estimated weighted-average life of each
security based on its contractual details and expected paydown schedule based upon the underlying collateral, the value of
the underlying collateral which would be realized in the event of a waterfall event, an estimate of the likelihood of a
waterfall event and an estimate of the likelihood of a permanent auction suspension. Significant changes in these
unobservable inputs would result in significantly different fair value measurements. Generally, a change in the assumption
used for the probability of a waterfall event is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for
the probability of a permanent suspension. A waterfall event occurs if the funded reserves of the securities become
insufficient to make the interest payments, resulting in the disbursement of the securities’ underlying collateral, the value
which is currently greater than the fair value of the securities, to the security holders.
The corporate notes/bonds are valued using a discounted cash flow method incorporating both observable and
unobservable inputs. The unobservable inputs utilized in the valuation are the anticipated future monthly principal and
interest payments, an estimated rate of decrease of those payments, the value of the underlying collateral, the number of
securities currently in technical default as grouped by the underlying collateral, an estimated average recovery rate of
those securities and assumptions surrounding additional defaults. Significant changes in these unobservable inputs would
result in significantly different fair value measurements. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the anticipated
monthly payments is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the average recovery rate and a directionally
opposite change in the yearly decrease in payments and additional defaults assumptions.
15
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
The following table presents the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of each of the above
Level 3 assets, as well as the impact on the fair value measurement resulting from a significant increase or decrease in
each input in isolation:
Unobservable Input
Range (weighted average)
Effect of Significant
Increase/(Decrease) in
Input on Fair Value
As at March 1,
2014
Auction
rate
securities
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
$
36
Discounted
cash flow
Weighted-average life
8 - 19 years (14 years)
Collateral value (as a % of fair
value)
101 - 133% (117%)
Probability of waterfall event
5 - 10% (8%)
Corporate
bonds/notes
$
4
Discounted
cash flow
Anticipated monthly principal
and interest payments
Probability of permanent
suspension of auction
Yearly decrease in payments
Collateral value (as a % of fair
value)
Current securities in technical
default, by collateral grouping
Average recovery rate of
securities in technical default
5 - 10% (8%)
$0.1 million
10%
138%
0 - 100% (13%)
30%
Additional defaults assumption
0 - 44% (18%)
(Decrease)/
increase
Increase/
(decrease)
Increase/
(decrease)
(Decrease)/
increase
Increase/
(decrease)
(Decrease)/
increase
Increase/
(decrease)
(Decrease)/
increase
Increase/
(decrease)
(Decrease)/
increase
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Assets Held for Sale
As described in Note 11, the Company has decided to sell certain redundant assets and as a result, certain property, plant
and equipment assets have been classified as held for sale on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as at March 1,
2014, valued at $209 million, the lower of carrying value and fair value less costs to sell. Of the total assets held for sale,
$194 million were measured at fair value less costs to sell.
The fair values of the Company’s real estate assets held for sale were determined using bids from prospective purchasers,
executed purchase and sale agreements or letters of intent, and market appraisals conducted for the Company by certified
appraisers. The fair values of the Company’s equipment assets held for sale were determined using executed purchase and
sale agreements, bids received from prospective purchasers, or replacement cost or sales comparison approaches with
inputs including, but not limited to, original costs, inflation indices, useful lives, effective ages, and market-derived
depreciation curves for similar assets. Some of these inputs are unobservable.
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
As at March 1, 2014
Assets held for sale
Real estate
Equipment
Total assets held for sale
LLA Impairment
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
$
$
— $
—
— $
150
29
179
$
$
— $
15
15
$
150
44
194
During fiscal 2014, the Company conducted an LLA impairment test on its held and used assets, and as a result of that
test, determined that the carrying values of certain of the Company's assets exceeded their fair values as at the
Measurement Date. Accordingly, the Company recorded the LLA Impairment Charge of approximately $2.7 billion and
16
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
presented the impaired assets at their fair values on the Company’s balance sheets as at November 30, 2013. See Note 1
for details related to the LLA impairment test performed.
The fair values of the Company’s real estate assets were determined using market appraisals conducted by certified
appraisers.
The fair values of the Company’s property, plant and equipment, other than real estate assets ("Personal Property"), were
determined using replacement cost or sales comparison approaches with inputs including, but not limited to, original
costs, inflation indices, useful lives, effective ages, and market-derived depreciation curves for similar assets. Some of
these inputs are unobservable.
The fair value of certain of the Company’s licenses, representing payments relating to licensing agreements, were
determined using a volume ratio approach, including a comparison of the Company’s current average quarterly unit
volumes for each license to those known at the time the Company entered into the license. Some of the inputs are
unobservable.
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis
as at November 4, 2013 (the date of impairment) and which have not subsequently been reclassified as held for sale:
As at November 4, 2013
Assets held and used
Property, plant and equipment
Real estate
Personal Property
Total property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Licenses
Total assets held and used
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
$
$
— $
—
—
—
— $
594
—
594
—
594
$
$
— $
408
408
226
634
$
594
408
1,002
226
1,228
The Company’s Level 3 assets measured on a non-recurring basis consist of personal property and licenses that were
written down to fair value related to the LLA Impairment Charge.
The Company’s personal property that was written down was valued using replacement cost or sales comparison
approaches, both utilizing unobservable inputs. The unobservable inputs used in the valuations are the current effective
age of the personal property being valued and the estimated useful life.
The licenses that were written down to fair value related to the LLA Impairment Charge were valued using a volume ratio
approach incorporating unobservable inputs. The unobservable inputs used in the valuation are the current volume of
units subject to the licensing agreements and the volume of units as of the date the licenses were entered into, which
represents the volume ratio. This ratio was applied to the net book value of the licenses in order to determine its fair value.
Significant changes in these unobservable inputs could result in significantly different fair value measurements.
The following table presents the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of each of the above
Level 3 assets:
As at March 1, 2014
Personal Property - held for sale
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable Input
$
15 Discounted cash flow Effective age
Range (weighted average)
0 - 14 years (3 years)
Useful life
2 - 10 years (5 years)
17
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
As at November 4, 2013
Personal Property - held in use
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable Input
$
408 Replacement cost of
Effective age
sales comparison
Licenses
$
226 Volume ratio
Useful life
Volume ratio
Range (weighted average)
0 - 14 years (3 years)
2 - 10 years (5 years)
10 - 33% (17%)
5. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DETAILS
Accounts receivable, net
The allowance for doubtful accounts as at March 1, 2014 is $17 million (March 2, 2013 -$17 million).
There were no customers that comprised more than 10% of accounts receivable as at March 1, 2014 (March 2, 2013 – no
customers that comprised more than 10%).
Inventories
Inventories were comprised of the following:
Raw materials
Work in process
Finished goods
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
$
$
51
$
156
37
244
$
271
278
54
603
During fiscal 2014, the Company recorded charges against inventory and supply commitments of approximately $2.4
billion. The charges included a write-down of inventory of approximately $1.6 billion and supply commitments of
approximately $782 million.
Property, plant and equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment were comprised of the following:
Cost
Land
Buildings, leasehold improvements and other
BlackBerry operations and other information technology
Manufacturing equipment, research and development equipment and tooling
Furniture and fixtures
Accumulated amortization
Net book value
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
$
71
$
737
1,297
541
21
2,667
1,725
$
942
$
93
1,120
2,440
875
104
4,632
2,559
2,073
As at March 1, 2014, the carrying amount of assets under construction was $45 million (March 2, 2013 -$109 million). Of
this amount, $34 million was included in buildings, leasehold improvements and other (March 2, 2013 -$62 million); $2
million was included in BlackBerry operations and other information technology (March 2, 2013 -$36 million); $9 million
was included in manufacturing equipment, research and development equipment, and tooling (March 2, 2013 - $11
million); and nil was included in furniture and fixtures (March 2, 2013 - $0.4 million).
18
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
For the year ended March 1, 2014, amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment was $532 million
(March 2, 2013 -$721 million; March 3, 2012 -$660 million).
Intangible assets, net
Intangible assets were comprised of the following:
Acquired technology
Intellectual property
Acquired technology
Intellectual property
As at March 1, 2014
Cost
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Book
Value
387
2,176
2,563
$
$
284
855
1,139
As at March 2, 2013
Accumulated
Amortization
Cost
432
4,382
4,814
$
$
257
1,127
1,384
$
$
$
$
103
1,321
1,424
Net Book
Value
175
3,255
3,430
$
$
$
$
During fiscal 2014, the additions to intangible assets primarily consisted of payments relating to amended or renewed
licensing agreements, as well as agreements with third parties for the use of intellectual property, software, messaging
services and other BlackBerry related features.
For the year ended March 1, 2014, amortization expense related to intangible assets was $738 million (March 2, 2013 -
$1.2 billion; March 3, 2012 -$863 million). Total additions to intangible assets in fiscal 2014 were $1.1 billion (2013 -$1.2
billion).
Based on the carrying value of the identified intangible assets as at March 1, 2014 and assuming no subsequent
impairment of the underlying assets, the annual amortization expense for each of the succeeding years is expected to be as
follows: 2015 - $362 million; 2016 - $195 million; 2017 - $176 million; 2018 - $139 million; and 2019 - $128 million.
The weighted-average remaining useful life of the acquired technology is 3.7 years (2013 -3.2 years).
Impairment of long-lived assets
During fiscal 2014, the Company recorded the LLA Impairment Charge of approximately $2.7 billion, of which $852
million of the charge was applicable to property, plant and equipment and $1.9 billion was applicable to intangible assets.
See Note 1 and 4 for a description of the LLA impairment test performed and the conclusions made by the Company.
Goodwill
Changes to the carrying amount of goodwill during the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014 were as follows:
Balance as at March 3, 2012
Goodwill acquired through business combinations during the year
Goodwill impairment charge
Balance as at March 2, 2013 and March 1, 2014
Gross
Amount
Accumulated
Impairment
Losses
Net
Amount
$
$
659
$
31
—
690
$
(355) $
—
(335)
(690) $
304
31
(335)
—
The Company performed a goodwill impairment analysis during fiscal 2012 and concluded that impairment existed.
Based on the results of that test, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $355 million in fiscal 2012.
Due to business conditions and a continued significant decline in the Company’s market capitalization, the Company
concluded that goodwill impairment indicators existed and an interim goodwill impairment assessment was required in
fiscal 2013. In the first step of the goodwill impairment test, the estimated fair value of the Company was determined
19
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
utilizing a market-based approach and the Company’s market capitalization was used as a key input for the determination
of fair value of the Company. The Company’s market capitalization was determined by multiplying the number of shares
outstanding as at June 2, 2012 by the average closing market price of the Company’s common shares over the preceding
five-day period. The Company used this duration in order to incorporate the inherent market fluctuations that may affect
any individual closing price of the Company’s shares. The Company believes that market capitalization alone does not
capture the fair value of the business as a whole, or the substantial value that an acquirer would obtain from its ability to
obtain control of the business. Consequently, the Company developed an estimate for the control premium that a
marketplace participant might pay to acquire control of the business in an arm’s-length transaction. The determination of
the control premium requires significant judgment and the Company observed recent market transactions as a guide to
establish a range of reasonably possible control premiums to estimate the Company’s fair value. The Company believes
that the main factors leading to the impairment were a significant decline in its share price, which was influenced by
delays in new product introductions, intense competition within the Company’s industry and a sustained decline in the
Company’s performance. The result of this analysis concluded that the carrying value of the Company exceeded its
estimated fair value, and as such, the second step of the goodwill impairment test was performed.
In the second step of the impairment test, the impairment loss was measured by estimating the implied fair value of the
Company’s goodwill and comparing it with its carrying value. Using the Company’s fair value determined in the first step
of the goodwill impairment test as the acquisition price in a hypothetical acquisition of the Company, the implied fair
value of goodwill was calculated as the residual amount of the acquisition price after allocations made to the fair value of
net assets, including working capital, property, plant and equipment and both recognized and unrecognized intangible
assets. Based on the results of the second step of the goodwill impairment test, it was concluded that the carrying value of
goodwill was impaired. Consequently, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $335 million in fiscal
2013 to write-off the entire carrying value of its goodwill, and reported this amount as a separate line item in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Accrued liabilities
Accrued liabilities were comprised of the following:
Vendor inventory liabilities
Warranty
Royalties
Carrier liabilities
Other
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
244
204
106
153
507
130
318
501
141
764
$
1,214
$
1,854
Other accrued liabilities, as noted in the above table, include, among other things, salaries and payroll withholding taxes,
none of which are greater than 5% of the current liabilities balance.
6. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
There were no material business acquisitions made by the Company in fiscal 2014.
During fiscal 2013, the Company purchased for cash consideration 88% of the shares of Paratek Microwave Inc.
(“Paratek”), representing all remaining shares of Paratek which were not previously held by the Company. Immediately
prior to the acquisition date, the Company owned a 12% interest in Paratek. The non-controlling interest had a carrying
value of $20 million and was re-measured at a fair value of $20 million, and resulted in no gain or loss. The valuation was
based on the application of a minority interest discount to the aggregate purchase consideration paid and then allocating
the implied value of Paratek, on a minority interest basis, across the shares outstanding. The acquired technology will be
incorporated into the Company’s products to enhance radio frequency tuning technologies.
The acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method whereby identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
assumed were measured at their fair values as of the date of acquisition. The excess of the acquisition price over such fair
20
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
value, if any, is recorded as goodwill, which is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The Company includes the
operating results of each acquired business in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
acquisition for fiscal 2013:
Assets purchased
Current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Other assets
Customer relationship intangible
Acquired technology
Deferred income tax asset
Goodwill(1)
Liabilities assumed
Deferred income tax liability
Net non-cash assets acquired
Cash acquired
Purchase price
Consideration
Cash consideration
Fair value of equity interest previously held
Contingent consideration(2)
For the year ended
March 2, 2013
$
$
$
$
4
2
4
10
96
39
31
186
(23)
(38)
(61)
125
1
126
93
20
13
126
_______________
(1) Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition price over the fair value of net assets acquired, which is not
expected to be deductible for tax purposes when goodwill results from share purchases. None of the goodwill
resulting from certain assets purchased in fiscal 2013 is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The entire
goodwill balance was included in the goodwill impairment charge incurred in fiscal 2013, as discussed in Note
5.
(2) The Company has agreed to additional consideration contingent upon the retention of key employees for a
period of 24 months from the acquisition date.
The weighted-average amortization period of the acquired technology related to the business acquisition completed during
the year ended March 2, 2013 is approximately 4.3 years.
Pro forma results of operations for the acquisitions have not been presented because the effects of the operations,
individually or in aggregate, are not considered to be material to the Company’s consolidated results.
21
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
7.
INCOME TAXES
The difference between the amount of the provision for income taxes and the amount computed by multiplying income
from continuing operations before income taxes by the statutory Canadian tax rate is reconciled as follows:
Statutory Canadian tax rate
Expected provision for (recovery of) income taxes from continuing
operations
Differences in income taxes resulting from:
Valuation allowance
Investment tax credits
Canadian tax rate differences
Change in unrecognized income tax benefits
Non-deductible goodwill impairment
Foreign tax rate differences
Other differences
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:
Canadian
Foreign
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
26.6%
26.6%
28.0%
$
(1,908)
$
(324)
$
425
781
(77)
(82)
—
—
(10)
(15)
(1,311)
$
—
(127)
(125)
(116)
84
6
10
(592)
$
—
(138)
(21)
—
90
12
(21)
347
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
(7,212) $
28
(7,184) $
(1,365) $
145
(1,220) $
1,272
246
1,518
$
$
$
The provision for (recovery of) income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following:
Current
Canadian
Foreign
Deferred
Canadian
Foreign
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
$
$
(1,203) $
77
(184)
(1)
(1,311) $
(760) $
88
68
12
(592) $
176
181
34
(44)
347
22
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following temporary differences:
Assets
Property, plant and equipment
Non-deductible reserves
Minimum taxes
Convertible debenture (see note 8)
Research and development
Tax loss carryforwards
Other
Deferred income tax assets
Valuation allowance
Deferred income tax assets net of valuation allowance
Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment
Research and development
Withholding tax on unremitted earnings
Deferred income tax liabilities
Net deferred income tax asset/(liability)
Deferred income tax asset - current
Deferred income tax liability - long-term
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
$
$
$
$
$
430
120
120
95
41
25
25
856
783
73
—
—
(32)
(32)
41
73
(32)
41
$
$
$
—
182
—
—
—
28
2
212
—
212
(287)
(31)
—
(318)
(106)
139
(245)
(106)
The Company regularly assesses the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. In making that
assessment, the Company considers both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the
deferred tax assets to determine, based on the weight of available evidence, whether it is more-likely-than-not that some
or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, the Company noted that
there were significant increases in deductible temporary differences in fiscal 2014 in relation to the LLA Impairment
Charge, which was not currently deductible for tax purposes. In addition, the Company has three years of cumulative
losses for fiscal 2014. As a result, the Company was unable to recognize the benefit relating to a significant portion of
deferred tax assets that arose in fiscal 2014, which resulted in the recognition of a $783 million valuation allowance
against its deferred tax assets. The deferred tax recovery is partially offset by this deferred tax valuation allowance of
$781 million and included in the income tax provision in fiscal 2014 (March 2, 2013 - nil). This accounting treatment has
no effect on the Company’s actual ability to utilize deferred tax assets to reduce future cash tax payments. The Company
will continue to assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be realizable at each reporting period and the
valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly.
During the third quarter, the Company took steps to accelerate the receipt of a portion of the tax refund to which it is
entitled. The Canadian federal and Ontario provincial Ministers of Finance had indicated to the Company that they would
be prepared to recommend measures such that the acceleration would not jeopardize the entitlement to the balance of its
tax refund. The Company's actions resulted in a November 3, 2013 taxation year end (triggering the entitlement to the tax
refund accrued to that date). In December 2013, Remission Orders were made by the Canadian federal and Ontario
provincial governments which preserved the Company's ability to carry back losses for the balance of its fiscal 2014 year
and for its fiscal 2015 year on the same basis as without the November 3, 2013 taxation year end. The tax provision
includes the impact of the Remission Orders in accordance with ASC 740.
Given the change in financial circumstances for the Company in fiscal 2014 (see Note 1 - Critical Accounting Estimates -
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets), a determination was made that the Company no longer has plans to permanently
23
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
reinvest the cumulative earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. As a result, $32 million relating to future withholding taxes
was accrued as a deferred tax liability.
The Company’s total unrecognized income tax benefits as at March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013 were $8 million and $29
million, respectively. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized income tax benefits that, if
recognized, would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate is as follows:
Unrecognized income tax benefits, opening balance
Increase for income tax positions of prior years
Increase for income tax positions of current year
Settlement of tax positions
Expiration of statute of limitations
Other
Unrecognized income tax benefits, ending balance
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
$
$
29
5
—
(23)
—
(3)
8
$
$
146
9
2
(152)
—
24
29
$
$
164
15
—
(8)
(24)
(1)
146
As at March 1, 2014, all of the unrecognized income tax benefits of $8 million have been netted against deferred income
tax assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets in accordance with ASU 2013-11. See Note 2 for details on ASU
2013-11.
A summary of open tax years by major jurisdiction is presented below:
Jurisdiction
Canada(1)
United States(2)
United Kingdom
_______________
Fiscal 2009 - 2014
Fiscal 2012 - 2014
Fiscal 2011 - 2014
(1)
(2)
Includes federal as well as provincial and state jurisdictions, as applicable.
Pertains to federal tax years. Certain state jurisdictions remain open from fiscal 2010 through fiscal 2014.
The Company is subject to ongoing examination by tax authorities in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company
regularly assesses the status of these examinations and the potential for adverse outcomes to determine the adequacy of
the provision for income taxes as well as the provisions for indirect and other taxes and related penalties and interest. The
Company believes it is reasonably possible that approximately $5 million of its gross unrecognized income tax benefit
will be realized in the next twelve months. While the final resolution of these audits is uncertain, the Company believes
the ultimate resolution of these audits will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits as interest expense that is
netted and reported within investment income (loss). The amount of interest accrued as at March 1, 2014 was
approximately $1 million (March 2, 2013 – approximately $6 million). The amount of penalties accrued as at March 1,
2014 was nominal (March 2, 2013 – nominal).
24
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
As at March 1, 2014, the Company has the following net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits which are not
recognized for accounting purposes and are scheduled to expire in the following years:
Year of Expiry
Net Operating Losses
Capital Losses
2026
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
Indefinite
$
$
4
16
—
28
2
—
—
—
50
$
$
Research and
Development Tax Credits
Minimum Taxes
— $
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
6
$
—
1
1
—
32
29
—
63
$
—
—
—
120
—
—
—
—
120
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Convertible Debentures
In November 2013, the Purchasers invested in the Company through a $1.0 billion private placement of Debentures, with
an option to purchase an additional $250 million principal amount of Debentures. On January 16, 2014, Fairfax exercised
the option to invest the $250 million in principal amount.
Interest on the Debentures is payable quarterly in arrears at a rate of 6% per annum. The Debentures have a term of seven
years and each $1,000 of Debentures are convertible at any time into 100 common shares of the Company, for a total of
125 million common shares at a price of $10.00 per share for all Debentures, subject to adjustments.
The Company has the option to redeem the Debentures after November 13, 2016 at specified redemption prices in
specified periods. Covenants associated with the Debentures include limitations on the Company’s total indebtedness.
Under specified events of default, the outstanding principal and any accrued interest on the Debentures become
immediately due and payable upon request of one quarter of the Debenture holders. During an event of default the
interest rate rises to 10% per annum.
The Debentures are subject to a change of control provision whereby the Company would be required to make an offer to
repurchase the Debentures at 115% of par value if a person or group (not affiliated with Fairfax Financial Holdings
Limited) acquires 35% of the Company’s outstanding common shares, acquires all or substantially all of its assets, or if
the Company merges with another entity and the Company’s existing shareholders hold less than 50% of the common
shares of the surviving entity.
Due to the possible volatility through the Company’s statements of operations resulting from fluctuation in the fair value
of the embedded conversion option as well as the number of other embedded derivatives within the Debentures, the
Company has elected to record the Debentures, including the debt itself and all embedded derivatives, at fair value and
present the Debentures as a hybrid financial instrument. No portion of the fair value of the Debentures has been recorded
as equity nor would be if each component was freestanding. As of March 1, 2014, the fair value of the Company's
convertible debt was $1.6 billion. The difference between the fair value of the Debentures and the unpaid principal
balance of $1.3 billion is $377 million. For additional information about the fair value measurement of the Debentures,
see Note 4.
The Company recorded a non-cash charge associated with the change in the fair value of the Debentures of $377 millon in
fiscal 2014. This charge is presented on a separate line in the Company’s statements of operations. The fair value
adjustment charge does not impact the key terms of the Debentures such as the face value, the redemption features or the
conversion price.
The Company recorded interest expense related to the Debentures of $21 million, which has been included in investment
income (loss) in the statements of operations in fiscal 2014. The Company is required to make quarterly interest-only
25
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
payments of approximately $19 million per year during the seven years. Fairfax, a related party, owns $500 million
principal amount of Debentures and receives interest at the same rate as other debenture holders.
In the course of issuing these Debentures, the Company incurred costs of $42 million. As the Company has elected the
fair value option for the recording of the Debentures, these costs have been fully expensed in the period in which they
were incurred and are recorded in selling, marketing and administration expenses in the statement of operations.
9. CAPITAL STOCK
(a) Capital stock
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of non-voting, redeemable, retractable Class A common shares,
an unlimited number of voting common shares and an unlimited number of non-voting, cumulative, redeemable,
retractable preferred shares. At March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, there were no Class A common shares or preferred
shares outstanding.
The following details the changes in issued and outstanding common shares for the three years ended March 1, 2014:
Capital Stock and
Additional Paid-In Capital
Treasury Stock
Stock
Outstanding
(000’s)
Amount
Stock
Outstanding
(000’s)
Amount
Common shares outstanding as at February 26, 2011
523,869
$
2,359
2,753
$
Exercise of stock options
Stock-based compensation
Tax deficiencies related to stock-based
compensation
Purchase of treasury stock
Treasury shares released for RSU settlements
291
—
—
—
—
Common shares outstanding as at March 3, 2012
524,160
Stock-based compensation
Tax deficiencies related to stock-based
compensation
Purchase of treasury stock
Treasury shares released for RSU settlements
Common shares outstanding as at March 2, 2013
Exercise of stock options
Common shares issued for RSU settlements
Stock-based compensation
Tax deficiencies related to stock-based
compensation
Purchase of treasury stock
Treasury shares released for RSU settlements
—
—
—
—
524,160
417
1,975
—
—
—
—
Common shares outstanding as at March 1, 2014
526,552
$
9
97
(2)
—
(17)
2,446
86
(11)
—
(90)
2,431
3
—
68
(13)
—
(71)
2,418
—
—
—
6,317
(359)
8,711
—
—
3,006
(2,697)
9,020
—
—
—
—
1,641
(3,001)
7,660
$
(160)
—
—
—
(156)
17
(299)
—
—
(25)
90
(234)
—
—
—
—
(16)
71
(179)
The Company had 527 million voting common shares outstanding, 3 million options to purchase voting common shares,
24 million RSUs and 0.2 million DSUs outstanding as at March 24, 2014.
(b) Stock-based compensation
Stock Option Plan
The Company recorded a charge to income and a credit to paid-in-capital of approximately $5 million in fiscal 2014
(fiscal 2013 - $8 million; fiscal 2012 - $27 million) in relation to stock-based compensation expense.
26
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
The Company has presented excess tax deficiencies from the exercise of stock-based compensation awards as a financing
activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Stock options previously granted under the Prior Plans generally vest over a period of three years to a maximum of five
years and are generally exercisable over a period of five years to a maximum of seven years from the grant date. The
Company issues new shares to satisfy stock option exercises. There are 14 million shares in the equity pool available for
future grants under the Company’s 2014 Plan as at March 1, 2014. Under the 2014 Plan, any shares that are issued as
options shall be counted as 0.625 shares against the 2014 Plan's total shares in the equity pool available for future grants
and shares issued as awards other than options (i.e., RSUs) shall be counted as one share against the 2014 Plan's total
shares in the equity pool available for future grants.
A summary of option activity since February 26, 2011 is shown below:
Options Outstanding
Number
(000’s)
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(millions)
Balance as at February 26, 2011
Exercised during the year
Forfeited/cancelled/expired during the year
Balance as at March 3, 2012
Granted during the year
Forfeited/cancelled/expired during the year
Balance as at March 2, 2013
Exercised during the year
Forfeited/cancelled/expired during the year
Balance as at March 1, 2014
Vested and expected to vest as at March 1, 2014
Exercisable as at March 1, 2014
4,610
(291)
(701)
3,618
5,288
(1,646)
7,260
(417)
(3,576)
3,267
3,153
1,290
$
$
$
$
70.36
29.70
64.58
73.86
7.86
60.86
27.53
7.36
42.55
12.08
12.23
18.57
3.32
3.31
2.93
$
$
$
8
6
3
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the aggregate difference
between the closing stock price of the Company’s common shares on March 1, 2014 and the exercise price for in-the-
money options) that would have been received by the option holders if all in-the-money options had been exercised on
March 1, 2014. The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal 2014, calculated using the average market
price during the year, was approximately $0.59 per share.
A summary of unvested stock options since March 2, 2013 is shown below:
Balance as at March 2, 2013
Vested during the year
Forfeited during the year
Balance as at March 1, 2014
Options Outstanding
Number
(000’s)
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
5,187
(1,517)
(1,693)
1,977
$
$
4.71
5.03
4.71
4.48
As at March 1, 2014, there was $9 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested stock
options which will be expensed over the vesting period, which, on a weighted-average basis, results in a period of
approximately 1.34 years. The total fair value of stock options vested during the year ended March 1, 2014 was $8
million.
Cash received from the stock options exercised for the year ended March 1, 2014 was $3 million (March 2, 2013 - nil;
March 3, 2012 - $9 million). Tax deficiencies incurred by the Company related to the stock options exercised was $2
million at March 1, 2014 (March 2, 2013 – tax deficiency of $1 million; March 3, 2012 – tax deficiency of $2 million).
27
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
During the year ended March 1, 2014, there were no stock options granted (March 2, 2013 - 5,288,040; March 3, 2012 -
there were no stock options granted).
Restricted Share Unit Plan
The Company recorded compensation expense with respect to RSUs of approximately $63 million in the year ended
March 1, 2014 (March 2, 2013 -$78 million; March 3, 2012 -$70 million).
A summary of RSU activity since February 26, 2011 is shown below:
Balance as at February 26, 2011
Granted during the year
Vested during the year
Forfeited/cancelled during the year
Balance as at March 3, 2012
Granted during the year
Vested during the year
Forfeited/cancelled during the year
Balance as at March 2, 2013
Granted during the year
Vested during the year
Forfeited/cancelled during the year
Balance as at March 1, 2014
Vested and expected to vest March 1, 2014
Number
(000’s)
2,703
$
7,093
(359)
(842)
8,595
11,189
(2,697)
(1,902)
15,185
21,741
(4,977)
(7,604)
24,345
23,736
$
$
RSUs Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(millions)
57.40
25.33
60.42
45.73
31.96
7.94
38.96
25.46
13.83
7.39
17.11
11.44
8.15
8.11
2.86
2.89
$
$
244
237
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the aggregate closing share
price of the Company’s common shares on March 1, 2014) that would have been received by RSU holders if all RSUs had
been vested on March 1, 2014.
Tax deficiencies incurred by the Company related to the RSUs vested was $11 million for the year ended March 1, 2014
(March 2, 2013 - $10 million; March 3, 2012 - nil).
In order to comply with its obligation to deliver shares upon vesting, the Company purchases shares via a trustee selected
by the Company or issues new common shares. During the year ended March 1, 2014, the Company purchased 1,641,447
common shares for total cash consideration of approximately $16 million (March 2, 2013 - 3,005,670 common shares
were purchased for total cash consideration of approximately $25 million). These purchased shares are classified as
treasury stock for accounting purposes and included in the shareholders’ equity section of the Company’s consolidated
balance sheets.
As at March 1, 2014, there was $167 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to RSUs that will be
expensed over the vesting period, which, on a weighted-average basis, results in a period of approximately 2.04 years.
During the year ended March 1, 2014, there were 21,741,154 RSUs granted (March 2, 2013 – 11,189,498 RSUs were
granted), of which 16,210,460 will be settled upon vesting by the issuance of new common shares and 10,521,418 of
which were granted as an inducement grant and are exempt from the equity pool under the Company's 2014 Plan.
Deferred Share Unit Plan
The Company issued 128,272 DSUs in the year ended March 1, 2014. There were 0.2 million DSUs outstanding as at
March 1, 2014 (March 2, 2013 - 0.3 million). The Company had a liability of $2.4 million in relation to the DSU plan as
at March 1, 2014 (March 2, 2013 - $4.3 million).
28
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) Credit facility
The Company has a $525 million asset-backed lending arrangement (the “Facility”) for working capital and general
corporate purposes with a syndicate of commercial banks. The Facility, which is subject to certain availability criteria and
limits and customary financial covenants, expires on August 27, 2016 and is secured by the Company’s accounts
receivable, inventory, equipment, mortgages on certain real property and a stock pledge of certain subsidiaries. The
Company has utilized approximately $5 million of the Facility for its outstanding letters of credit as of March 1, 2014.
(b) Lease commitments
The Company is committed to future minimum annual lease payments related to real estate operating leases as follows:
For the fiscal years ending
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
$
47
38
28
25
20
38
$
196
For the year ended March 1, 2014, the Company incurred rental expense of $80 million (March 2, 2013 - $91 million;
March 3, 2012 - $91 million).
(c) Litigation
The Company is involved in litigation in the normal course of its business, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. The
Company is subject to a variety of claims (including claims related to patent infringement, purported class actions and
other claims in the normal course of business) and may be subject to additional claims either directly or through
indemnities against claims that it provides to certain of its partners and customers. In particular, the industry in which the
Company competes has many participants that own, or claim to own, intellectual property, including participants that have
been issued patents and may have filed patent applications or may obtain additional patents and proprietary rights for
technologies similar to those used by the Company in its products. The Company has received, and may receive in the
future, assertions and claims from third parties that the Company’s products infringe on their patents or other intellectual
property rights. Litigation has been, and will likely continue to be, necessary to determine the scope, enforceability and
validity of third-party proprietary rights or to establish the Company’s proprietary rights. Regardless of whether claims
against the Company have merit, those claims could be time-consuming to evaluate and defend, result in costly litigation,
divert management’s attention and resources, subject the Company to significant liabilities and could have the other
effects.
Management reviews all of the relevant facts for each claim and applies judgment in evaluating the likelihood and, if
applicable, the amount of any potential loss. Where it is considered probable for a material exposure to result and where
the amount of the claim is quantifiable, provisions for loss are made based on management’s assessment of the likely
outcome. The Company does not provide for claims that are considered unlikely to result in a significant loss, claims for
which the outcome is not determinable or claims where the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated. Any
settlements or awards under such claims are provided for when reasonably determinable.
Additional lawsuits and claims, including purported class actions and derivative actions, may be filed or made based upon
the Company’s historical stock option granting practices. Management assesses such claims in accordance with the policy
described above.
As of March 1, 2014, there are claims outstanding for which the Company has assessed the potential loss as both probable
to result and reasonably estimable, therefore an accrual has been made that is not material to the Company's financial
statements. Further, there are claims outstanding for which the Company has assessed the potential loss as reasonably
possible to result, however an estimate of the amount of loss cannot reasonably be made. There are many reasons that the
Company cannot make these assessments, including, among others, one or more of the following: the early stages of a
proceeding, which does not require the claimant to specifically identify the patent that has allegedly been infringed;
damages sought that are unspecified, unsupportable, unexplained or uncertain; discovery not having been started or
29
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
incomplete; the complexity of the facts that are in dispute (e.g., once a patent is identified, the analysis of the patent and a
comparison to the activities of the Company is a labour-intensive and highly technical process); the difficulty of assessing
novel claims; the parties not having engaged in any meaningful settlement discussions; the possibility that other parties
may share in any ultimate liability; and the often slow pace of patent litigation.
Though the Company does not believe the following legal proceedings will result in a significant loss, and does not
believe they are claims for which the outcomes are determinable or where the amounts of the loss can be reasonably
estimated, the Company has included the following summaries of certain of its legal proceedings that it believes may be
of interest to its investors.
On October 31, 2008, Mformation Technologies, Inc. (“Mformation”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the
Company in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The patents in suit include U.S. Patent Nos.
6,970,917 and 7,343,408. These patents are generally directed to remote device management functionality. A jury trial
began on June 19, 2012. On July 13, 2012, the jury found that the Company had infringed the asserted patent claims,
awarding damages of $147.2 million. On August 8, 2012, Judge Ware overturned the jury verdict and granted judgment of
non-infringement as a matter of law. On September 5, 2012, Mformation filed a motion for a new trial. On September 6,
2012, Mformation filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. However, the Federal
Circuit deactivated the appeal while the motion for new trial was pending. On September 20, 2012, the case was
reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen, in view of Judge Ware’s retirement from the bench. Judge Chen subsequently
denied Mformation’s motion for new trial on November 15, 2012. On December 4, 2012, the court denied Mformation’s
motion for relief from costs. The Federal Circuit reactivated the appeal on December 20, 2012 after Mformation filed a
new notice of appeal. On January 3, 2013, a new entity, Mformation Software Technologies, Inc. (“MST”), filed a motion
to substitute parties, alleging that Mformation had dissolved and that MST had assumed the rights, but not the liabilities,
to the litigation. On January 14, 2013, the Company filed an opposition to MST’s motion, combined with a motion to
dismiss. On April 8, 2013, MST filed its opening substantive brief. On November 21, 2013, after a limited remand to the
District Court, the Federal Circuit denied both MST’s motion to substitute and the Company’s motion to dismiss. On
December 23, 2013, the Company filed its responsive substantive brief, and MST filed a reply brief on January 9, 2014.
Proceedings are ongoing.
On April 2, 2012, NXP B.V. (“NXP”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Middle
District of Florida (Orlando Division). NXP asserted that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,330,455; 6,434,654;
6,501,420; 5,597,668; 5,639,697; and 5,763,955. NXP alleges that its patents are generally directed to certain wireless
technologies including 802.11 standards GPS and embedded memory technology, as well as certain methods of
manufacture for semiconductor devices. The complaint seeks monetary damages, an injunction, and other relief that the
court deems just and proper. The Company filed its Answer on May 30, 2012. Prior to trial, NXP dropped patents
5,597,668; 5,639,697; and 5,763,955. The trial began on March 24, 2014. Proceedings are ongoing.
On September 10, 2013, Cypress Semiconductor Corp. (“Cypress”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of California. Cypress asserted that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos.
6,012,103; 6,249,825; and 6,493,770, generally relating to reconfiguration of a peripheral device connected to a host
computer. Cypress also asserted that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 8,004,497; 8,059,015; and 8,519,973,
generally relating to capacitive touchscreens. The complaint seeks an injunction, monetary damages, and other relief that
the court deems just and proper. On November 4, 2013, the Company filed an answer and counterclaims. The Company
asserted that Cypress infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,834,586, 7,986,127, and 8,169,187, generally directed to USB charging.
The counterclaims seek an injunction, monetary damages, and other relief that the court deems just and proper. On
December 2, 2013, Cypress filed an answer to the Company’s counterclaims. Proceedings are ongoing.
On November, 4, 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit against Cypress Semiconductor Corp. (“Cypress”) in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The Company asserted that Cypress infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,034,623,
generally directed to a radio modem with radio and telemetry functions, and U.S. Patent No. 6,833,686, generally directed
to an adaptive rate battery charging circuit. On January 13, 2014, Cypress filed an answer to the complaint. On January
30, 2014, Cypress filed petitions for inter partes review for both patents in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. On
February 4, 2014, Cypress filed a motion to stay the lawsuit pending the inter partes reviews. Proceedings are ongoing.
On January 3, 2014, the Company filed a lawsuit against Typo Products LLC (“Typo”) in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California. The Company asserted that Typo infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,629,964, and 8,162,552,
generally directed to a keyboard for use with a mobile communication device. The Company also asserted that Typo
infringed U.S. Design Patent No. D685,775, generally directed to a keyboard design, and trade dress relating to
30
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
keyboards. The complaint seeks an injunction, monetary damages, and other relief that the court deems just and proper.
On January 22, 2014, the Company filed a motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin Typo from infringing U.S. Patent
No. 7,629,964 and U.S. Design Patent No. D.685,775. Typo filed its opposition on February 5, 2014, and the Company
filed a reply on February 12, 2014. Proceedings are ongoing.
Between May and August 2011, several purported class action lawsuits were filed against the Company and certain of its
present or former officers in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, two of which have been
voluntarily dismissed. On January 6, 2012, Judge Richard S. Sullivan consolidated the remaining three actions and
appointed both lead plaintiff and counsel. On April 5, 2012, plaintiff filed the Consolidated Amended Class Action
Complaint, alleging that during the period from December 16, 2010 through June 16, 2011, the Company and certain of
its officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s financial condition and business
prospects, and seek unspecified damages. Defendants brought a motion to dismiss the claim with prejudice, which was
granted on March 29, 2013. On April 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal. The appeal was argued on November 7,
2013 with judgment reserved. Proceedings are ongoing.
Between October and December 2013, several purported class action lawsuits and one individual lawsuit were filed
against the Company and certain of its former officers in various jurisdictions alleging that during the period from
September 27, 2012 through September 20, 2013, the Company and certain of its officers made materially false and
misleading statements regarding the Company’s financial condition and business prospects and that certain of the
Company’s financial statements contain material misstatements. The individual lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed. The
purported class action claims seek unspecified damages. Motions for the appointment of Lead Plaintiff and counsel have
been filed in the U.S. proceedings. Proceedings are ongoing in all cases.
(d) Concentrations in certain areas of the Company’s business
The Company attempts to ensure that most components essential to the Company’s business are generally available from
multiple sources, however certain components are currently obtained from limited sources within a competitive market,
which subjects the Company to significant supply, availability and pricing risks. Many components are at times subject to
industry-wide shortages and significant commodity pricing fluctuations including those that are available from multiple
sources. In addition, the Company has entered into various agreements for the supply of components, the manufacturing
of its products and agreements that allow the Company to use intellectual property owned by other companies; however,
there can be no guarantee that the Company will be able to extend or renew these agreements on similar terms, or at all.
Therefore, the Company remains subject to significant risks of supply shortages, intellectual property litigation risk as
well as potential price increases that can materially adversely affect its financial condition and operating results.
The Company also uses some custom components that are not common to the rest of the industry, and new products
introduced by the Company often utilize custom components available from only one source for a period of time. When a
component or product uses new technologies, initial capacity constraints may exist until the suppliers’ yields have
matured or manufacturing capacity has increased. If the Company’s supply of components for a new or existing product
were delayed or constrained, the Company’s financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely
affected. Further, if the Company was not able to find an alternative source for the necessary quantities, the Company’s
business and financial performance could also be materially adversely affected. Continued availability of these
components at acceptable prices, or at all, may be affected if those suppliers concentrate on the production of common
components instead of components customized to meet the Company’s requirements.
Substantially all of the Company’s hardware products are manufactured by outsourcing partners that are located primarily
in Europe, Asia or Mexico. A significant concentration of this manufacturing is currently performed by a small number of
outsourcing partners. Although the Company works closely with its outsourcing partners on manufacturing schedules, the
Company’s operating results could be adversely affected if its outsourcing partners were unable to meet their production
commitments.
(e)
Indemnifications
The Company enters into certain agreements that contain indemnification provisions under which the Company could be
subject to costs and damages, including in the event of an infringement claim against the Company or an indemnified
third party. Such intellectual property infringement indemnification clauses are generally not subject to any dollar limits
and remain in effect for the term of the Company’s agreements. To date, the Company has not encountered material costs
as a result of such indemnifications.
31
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and current and former executive officers.
Under these agreements, the Company agreed, subject to applicable law, to indemnify its directors and executive officers
against all costs, charges and expenses reasonably incurred by such individuals in respect of any civil, criminal or
administrative action which could arise by reason of their status as directors or officers. The Company maintains liability
insurance coverage for the benefit of its directors and current and former executive officers. The Company has not
encountered material costs as a result of such indemnifications in the current year. See the Company’s Management
Information Circular for fiscal 2013 for additional information regarding the Company’s indemnification agreements with
its directors and current and former executive officers.
11. COST OPTIMIZATION PROGRAMS
Fiscal 2013 Cost Optimization and Resource Efficiency (“CORE”) Program
In March 2012, the Company commenced the CORE program with the objective of improving the Company’s operations
and increasing efficiency. The program includes, among other things, the streamlining of the BlackBerry smartphone
product portfolio, the optimization of the Company’s global manufacturing footprint, the outsourcing of global repair
services, the alignment of the Company’s sales and marketing teams and a reduction in the global workforce. On
September 20, 2013, the Company announced that it had commenced implementation of a further workforce reduction of
approximately 4,500 positions to bring the total workforce to approximately 7,000 full-time global employees and that it
was targeting an approximate 50% reduction in operating expenditures by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The
Company expects to incur approximately $100 million in additional cash and non-cash, pre-tax charges related to the
CORE program by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015.
The Company incurred approximately $512 million in total pre-tax charges related to the CORE program and strategic
review process in fiscal 2014, related to one-time employee termination benefits, facilities and manufacturing network
simplification costs as well as legal and financial advisory costs related to the recently completed strategic review process.
Other charges and cash costs may occur as programs are implemented or changes are completed.
The following table sets forth the activity in the Company’s CORE program liability for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014:
Balance as at March 3, 2012
Charges incurred
Cash payments made
Balance as at March 2, 2013
Charges incurred
Cash payments made
Balance as at March 1, 2014
Employee
Termination
Benefits
Facilities
Costs
Manufacturing
Costs
Total
— $
— $
— $
123
(114)
9
190
(186)
13
$
32
(14)
18
93
(58)
53
$
65
(63)
2
65
(41)
26
$
$
$
—
220
(191)
29
348
(285)
92
The CORE program charges incurred in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014 were as follows:
Cost of sales
Research and development
Selling, marketing and administration(1)
Total CORE program charges
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
$
$
103
$
76
333
512
$
96
27
97
220
(1) CORE program charges in selling, marketing and administration include costs associated with the Company's recently
completed strategic review process as well as losses incurred related to the write-down to fair value less costs to sell of the
assets classified as held for sale, as noted below.
There were no CORE charges incurred during fiscal 2012.
As part of the CORE program, the Company has decided to sell certain redundant assets and discontinue certain
operations to drive cost savings and efficiencies in the Company. As a result, certain property, plant and equipment assets
32
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
have been classified as held for sale on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as at March 1, 2014, valued at $209
million (March 2, 2013 - $354 million), the lower of carrying value and fair value less costs to sell. Further, the Company
has recorded losses of approximately $110 million in fiscal 2014 (nil in fiscal 2013) related to the write-down to fair value
less costs to sell of the assets held for sale. Assets held for sale are expected to be sold within the next twelve months.
In fiscal 2013, the Company sold 100% of the shares of its wholly-owned subsidiary, NewBay Software Limited
(“NewBay”) and as a result, the operating results of NewBay are presented as discontinued operations in the Company's
consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012.
The following table sets forth the components of the Company’s loss from discontinued operations:
Revenues from discontinued operations
Loss from discontinued operations, before tax
Loss on disposal of discontinued operation
Income tax recovery
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
$
$
$
33
(20)
(3)
5
(18) $
12
(7)
—
—
(7)
Carrying values of significant assets and liabilities of NewBay at the time of sale include property, plant and equipment
and intangible assets of $41 million, current assets of $15 million and accrued liabilities of $13 million.
Fiscal 2012 Cost Optimization Program
In June 2011, the Company initiated a cost optimization program (the "2012 Cost Optimization Program") that included a
global workforce reduction of approximately 2,000 employees, representing approximately 10% of the total global
workforce. The Company incurred approximately $125 million in total pre-tax charges related to the 2012 Cost
Optimization Program in fiscal 2012. All of the pre-tax charges were related to one-time employee termination benefits,
and the identification of redundant facilities. During fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014 the Company made cash payments related
to employee termination benefits and facilities costs, as shown in the table below. No further charges are expected to be
incurred under this plan.
The following table sets forth the activity in the Company’s 2012 Cost Optimization Program liability for fiscal 2013 and
fiscal 2014:
Balance as at March 3, 2012
Cash payments made
Balance as at March 2, 2013
Cash payments made
Balance as at March 1, 2014
12. PRODUCT WARRANTY
Employee
Termination
Benefits
Facilities
Costs
Total
$
$
$
10
(10)
—
—
— $
44
(24)
20
(9)
11
$
$
54
(34)
20
(9)
11
The Company estimates its warranty costs at the time of revenue recognition based on historical experience and
expectations of future return rates and unit warranty repair costs. The warranty accrual balance is reviewed quarterly to
establish that it materially reflects the remaining obligation based on the anticipated future expenditures over the balance
of the obligation period. Adjustments are made when the actual warranty claim experience differs from estimates. The
warranty accrual is included in accrued liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
33
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
The change in the Company’s warranty expense and actual warranty experience from February 26, 2011 to March 1, 2014
as well as the accrued warranty obligations are set forth in the following table:
Accrued warranty obligations as at February 26, 2011
Actual warranty experience during fiscal 2012
Fiscal 2012 warranty provision
Adjustments for changes in estimate
Accrued warranty obligations as at March 3, 2012
Actual warranty experience during fiscal 2013
Fiscal 2013 warranty provision
Adjustments for changes in estimate
Accrued warranty obligations as at March 2, 2013
Actual warranty experience during fiscal 2014
Fiscal 2014 warranty provision
Adjustments for changes in estimate
Accrued warranty obligations as at March 1, 2014
$
$
459
(685)
622
12
408
(474)
392
(8)
318
(357)
270
(27)
204
13. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
Income (loss) for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share available
to common shareholders from continuing operations
Loss for basic and diluted loss per share available to common
shareholders from discontinued operations
$
$
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding (000’s) - basic
Effect of dilutive securities (000’s) - stock-based compensation (1)(2)
Weighted-average number of shares and assumed conversions (000’s)
- diluted
Earnings (loss) per share - reported
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations $
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations
Total basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
$
(5,873) $
(628) $
1,171
— $
(18) $
525,168
524,160
—
—
(7)
524,101
89
525,168
524,160
524,190
(11.18) $
—
(11.18) $
(1.20) $
(0.03)
(1.23) $
2.23
(0.01)
2.22
(1) The Company has not presented the dilutive effect of in-the-money options or RSUs that will be settled upon vesting by
the issuance of new common shares in the calculation of loss per share for the year ended March 1, 2014 as to do so
would be antidilutive. As at March 1, 2014, there were 346,264 options and 17,620,882 RSUs outstanding that were in-
the-money and may have a dilutive effect on earnings (loss) per share in future periods.
(2) The Company has not presented the dilutive effect of the Debentures as to do so would be antidilutive. See Note 8 for
details on the Debentures.
34
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
14. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
Accumulated net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments
Accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments
designated as cash flow hedges
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
$
$
1
$
(9)
(8) $
2
$
(6)
(4) $
The effects on net income of amounts reclassified from AOCI into income by component for the year ended March 1,
2014 were as follows:
Location of loss reclassified from AOCI into income
Revenue
Selling, marketing and administration
Research and development
Cost of sales
Recovery of income taxes
Total amount reclassified into income, net of tax
Gains and Losses on
Cash Flow Hedges
Gains and Losses on
Available-for-Sale
Securities
Total
$
$
(7) $
(17)
(6)
(2)
6
(26) $
— $
—
—
—
—
— $
2
38
40
(7)
(17)
(6)
(2)
6
(26)
15. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The notional amounts and fair values of financial instruments outstanding were as follows:
Assets (Liabilities)
Currency forward contracts - asset
Currency option contracts - asset
Currency forward contracts - liability
Currency option contracts - liability
Assets (Liabilities)
Currency forward contracts - asset
Currency option contracts - asset
Currency forward contracts - liability
Currency option contracts - liability
Foreign Exchange
As at March 1, 2014
Notional
Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
$
$
585
186
1,304
72
5
2
(26)
(2)
As at March 2, 2013
Notional
Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
$
2,356
$
309
1,332
426
57
2
(24)
(11)
The Company uses derivative instruments to manage exposures to foreign exchange risk resulting from transactions in
currencies other than its functional currency, the U.S. dollar. The Company’s currency risk management objective in
holding derivative instruments is to reduce the volatility of current and future income as a result of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. To limit its exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company
enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts.
35
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
The majority of the Company’s revenues for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014 were transacted in U.S. dollars.
However, portions of the revenues are denominated in Canadian dollars, Euros, and British Pounds. Purchases of raw
materials are primarily transacted in U.S. dollars. Other expenses, consisting of the majority of salaries, certain operating
costs and manufacturing overhead are incurred primarily in Canadian dollars. The Company enters into forward and
option contracts to hedge portions of these anticipated transactions to reduce the volatility on income associated with the
foreign currency exposures. The Company also enters into forward and option contracts to reduce the effects of foreign
exchange gains and losses resulting from the revaluation of certain foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities. At
March 1, 2014 approximately 35% of cash and cash equivalents, 26% of accounts receivables and 12% of accounts
payable and accrued liabilities are denominated in foreign currencies (March 2, 2013 – 19%, 29% and 5%).
The Company records all derivative instruments at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of these
instruments is calculated based on notional and exercise values, transaction rates, market quoted currency spot rates,
forward points, volatilities and interest rate yield curves. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
depends on the intended use of the derivative instrument and whether it is designated as a hedge.
The Company’s accounting policies for these instruments outline the criteria to be met in order to designate a derivative
instrument as a hedge and the methods for evaluating hedge effectiveness. Hedge effectiveness is formally assessed, both
at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, to determine whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly
effective in offsetting changes in the value of the hedged items. If an anticipated transaction is deemed no longer likely to
occur, the corresponding derivative instrument is de-designated as a hedge and any associated deferred gains and losses in
accumulated other comprehensive income are recognized in income at that time. Any future changes in the fair value of
the instrument are recognized in current income.
For any derivative instruments that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting, or for any derivative instrument
for which hedge accounting is not elected, the changes in fair value of the instruments are recognized in income in the
current period and will generally offset the changes in the fair value of the associated asset, liability, or forecasted
transaction.
The Company enters into forward and option contracts to hedge exposures relating to foreign currency anticipated
transactions. These contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges, with the effective portion of the change in fair
value initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified to income in the period
in which the cash flows from the associated hedged transactions affect income. Any ineffective portion of the change in
fair value of the cash flow hedge is recognized in current period income. For fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, there was
$4 million in realized losses on forward contracts which were ineffective upon maturity (fiscal year ended March 2, 2013
- $8 million in realized gains). As at March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, the outstanding derivatives designated as cash
flow hedges were considered to be fully effective. The maturity dates of these instruments range from March 2014 to
December 2014. As at March 1, 2014, the net unrealized loss on these forward and option contracts (including option
premiums paid) was $8 million (March 2, 2013 - net unrealized loss of $8 million). Unrealized gains associated with these
contracts were recorded in other current assets and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Unrealized losses
were recorded in accrued liabilities and AOCI. Option premiums were recorded in AOCI. As at March 1, 2014, the
Company estimates that approximately $8 million of net unrealized losses including option premiums on these forward
and option contracts will be reclassified into income within the next twelve months.
The following table shows the fair values of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated
balance sheets:
Currency forward contracts - asset
Currency option contracts - asset
Currency forward contracts - liability
Currency option contracts - liability
Currency option contracts - premiums
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
Balance Sheet
Classification
Fair Value
Balance Sheet
Classification
Fair Value
Other current assets
$
— Other current assets
$
Other current assets
Accrued liabilities
Accrued liabilities
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
36
1 Other current assets
(7) Accrued liabilities
(1) Accrued liabilities
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
(1)
13
2
(10)
(10)
(3)
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
During fiscal 2014, changes in forecasts and uncertainty in the probability of cash flows caused certain forward and
option contracts hedging exposures relating to anticipated foreign currency transactions to no longer qualify for hedge
accounting, and the Company de-designated and closed these forward and option contracts. As a result, unrealized losses
of $9 million (fiscal 2013 – nil) were transferred from AOCI to selling, marketing and administration.
The following table shows the impact of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated
statements of operations and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended March 1,
2014:
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivative Instruments
(Effective Portion)
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
Currency option contracts
$
Currency forward contracts
Currency forward contracts
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
— Revenue
(1) Cost of sales
$
(2) Selling, marketing and administration
(4) Research and development
(1) Research and development
(7)
(2)
(4)
(6)
—
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative Instruments
(Ineffective Portion)
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCI into Income (Ineffective
Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Ineffective Portion)
Currency forward contracts
$
— Selling, marketing and administration
$
(4)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative Instruments
(Unqualified Portion)
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCI into Income (Unqualified
Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Unqualified Portion)
Currency forward contracts
$
— Selling, marketing and administration
$
(9)
The following table shows the impact of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended March 2, 2013:
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivative Instruments
(Effective Portion)
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Currency forward contracts
$
7 Revenue
(10) Revenue
(1) Cost of sales
— Cost of sales
$
(2)
Selling, marketing and
administration
Selling, marketing and
administration
—
(1) Research and development
(1) Research and development
52
(5)
5
—
5
—
11
(1)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative Instruments
(Ineffective Portion)
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated OCI into Income
(Ineffective Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Ineffective Portion)
$
Selling, marketing and
administration
—
$
8
In addition to the outstanding forward and option contracts hedging exposures relating to anticipated foreign currency
transactions that no longer qualify for hedge accounting, the Company has also entered into other forward and option
37
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
contracts hedging anticipated foreign currency transactions on which it did not apply hedge accounting. Any realized and
unrealized gains and losses on these contracts are recognized in income each period. The maturity dates of these
instruments range from March 2014 to July 2014. As at March 1, 2014, there were unrealized losses (net of premium
paid) of $6 million recorded in respect of these instruments (March 2, 2013 - no unrealized gains or losses). Unrealized
gains associated with these contracts were recorded in other current assets and selling, marketing and administration
expenses. Unrealized losses were recorded in accrued liabilities and selling, marketing and administration expenses.
The following table shows the fair values of derivative instruments hedging anticipated foreign currency transactions on
which the Company did not or could not apply hedge accounting on the consolidated balance sheets:
Currency forward contracts - asset
Currency option contracts - asset
Currency forward contracts - liability
Currency option contracts - liability
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
Balance Sheet
Classification
Fair Value
Balance Sheet
Classification
Fair Value
Other current assets
$
— Other current assets
$
Other current assets
— Other current assets
Accrued liabilities
Accrued liabilities
(4) Accrued liabilities
— Accrued liabilities
—
—
—
—
As part of its currency risk management strategy, the Company may maintain net monetary asset and/or liability balances
in foreign currencies. The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain monetary assets and
liabilities that are exposed to foreign currency risk. The principal currencies hedged include the Canadian dollar, Euro,
and British Pound. These contracts are not subject to hedge accounting, and any realized and unrealized gains or losses are
recognized in income each period, offsetting the change in the U.S. dollar value of the asset or liability. The maturity dates
of these instruments range from March 2014 to May 2014. As at March 1, 2014, net unrealized losses (net of premium
paid) of $10 million were recorded in respect of these instruments (March 2, 2013 - net unrealized gains of $29 million).
Unrealized gains associated with these contracts were recorded in other current assets and selling, marketing and
administration expenses. Unrealized losses were recorded in accrued liabilities and selling, marketing and administration
expenses.
The following table shows the fair values of derivative instruments that are not subject to hedge accounting on the
consolidated balance sheets:
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
Balance Sheet
Classification
Fair Value
Balance Sheet
Classification
Fair Value
Currency forward contracts - asset
Currency option contracts - asset
Currency forward contracts - liability
Currency option contracts - liability
Other current assets
$
5 Other current assets
$
Other current assets
Accrued liabilities
Accrued liabilities
1 Other current assets
(15) Accrued liabilities
(1) Accrued liabilities
44
—
(14)
(1)
The following table shows the impact of derivative instruments that are not subject to hedge accounting on the
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended March 1, 2014:
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Selling, marketing and administration
$
Selling, marketing and administration
16
11
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative Instruments
Amount of Gain (Loss) in
Income on Derivative
Instruments
38
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
The following table shows the impact of derivative instruments that are not subject to hedge accounting on the
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended March 2, 2013:
Currency forward contracts
Currency option contracts
Selling, marketing and administration
$
Selling, marketing and administration
38
8
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative Instruments
Amount of Gain (Loss) in
Income on Derivative
Instruments
Credit Risk
The Company is exposed to credit risk on derivative financial instruments arising from the potential for counterparties to
default on their contractual obligations. The Company mitigates this risk by limiting counterparties to highly rated
financial institutions and by continuously monitoring their creditworthiness. The Company’s exposure to credit loss and
market risk will vary over time as a function of currency exchange rates. The Company measures its counterparty credit
exposure as a percentage of the total fair value of the applicable derivative instruments. Where the net fair value of
derivative instruments with any counterparty is negative, the Company deems the credit exposure to that counterparty to
be nil. As at March 1, 2014, the maximum credit exposure to a single counterparty, measured as a percentage of the total
fair value of derivative instruments with net unrealized gains, was 100% (March 2, 2013 - 29%; March 3, 2012 - 30%). As
at March 1, 2014, the Company had a total credit risk exposure across all counterparties with outstanding or unsettled
foreign exchange derivative instruments of nil on a notional value of $11 million (March 2, 2013 -$35 million total risk
exposure on a notional value of $1.8 billion).
The Company maintains Credit Support Annexes (“CSAs”) with several of its counterparties. These CSAs require that the
outstanding net position of all contracts to be made whole by the paying or receiving of collateral to or from the
counterparties on a daily basis, subject to exposure and transfer thresholds. As at March 1, 2014, the Company had paid
$15 million of collateral to counterparties, which approximated the fair value of those contracts. As with the derivatives
recorded in an unrealized loss position, this amount is recorded in other current liabilities.
The Company is exposed to market and credit risk on its investment portfolio. The Company reduces this risk by
investing in liquid, investment grade securities and by limiting exposure to any one entity or group of related entities. As
at March 1, 2014, no single issuer represented more than 33% of the total cash, cash equivalents and investments
(March 2, 2013 - no single issuer represented more than 22% of the total cash and cash equivalents and investments), and
that issuer was the United States Department of Treasury.
Interest Rate Risk
Cash and cash equivalents and investments are invested in certain instruments of varying maturities. Consequently, the
Company is exposed to interest rate risk as a result of holding investments of varying maturities. The fair value of
investments, as well as the investment income derived from the investment portfolio, will fluctuate with changes in
prevailing interest rates. The Company has also issued convertible debentures with a fixed interest rate. Consequently, the
Company is exposed to interest rate risk as a result of the long term of the debentures. The fair value of the debentures
will fluctuate with changes in prevailing interest rates. The Company does not currently utilize interest rate derivative
instruments to hedge its investment portfolio.
16. SEGMENT DISCLOSURES
The Company is organized and managed as a single reportable operating segment. The Company currently sells an
integrated BlackBerry wireless communications platform solution, which includes the sale of BlackBerry handheld
devices and the provision of data communication, compression and security infrastructure services, which enable
BlackBerry handheld wireless devices to send and receive wireless messages and data. For enterprise customers, the
Company currently sells an integrated BlackBerry Enterprise Server software solution that gives corporate and
government customers the ability to set and enforce specific information technology policies to manage their BlackBerry
handheld wireless devices when the data services pass through BlackBerry’s Relay and Provisioning infrastructure.
39
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
Revenue from continuing operations, classified by major geographic segments in which the Company’s customers are
located, was as follows:
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
$
$
491
1,320
1,811
604
2,387
2,991
907
1,104
6,813
7.2% $
19.4%
26.6%
8.9%
35.0%
43.9%
13.3%
661
2,235
2,896
1,238
3,264
4,502
2,114
6.0% $
20.2%
26.2%
11.2%
29.5%
40.7%
19.1%
1,260
4,182
5,442
1,919
5,743
7,662
2,646
16.2%
100.0% $
1,561
11,073
14.0%
100.0% $
2,673
18,423
6.8%
22.7%
29.5%
10.4%
31.2%
41.6%
14.4%
14.5%
100.0%
North America
Canada
United States
Europe, Middle East and Africa
United Kingdom
Other
Latin America
Asia Pacific
Revenue mix
Hardware
Service
Software
Other
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
Canada
United States
United Kingdom
Other
Total assets
Canada
United States
United Kingdom
Other
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
$
$
3,785
$
6,648
$
2,698
235
95
3,910
261
254
13,794
4,074
318
237
6,813
$
11,073
$
18,423
As at
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
2,058
$
4,895
239
7
62
2,366
2,362
2,207
954
2,029
$
$
395
30
169
5,489
8,252
1,713
1,071
2,129
7,552
$
13,165
$
$
$
$
Information about major customers
There were no customers that comprised more than 10% of the Company’s revenue in fiscal 2014 (fiscal 2013 – no
customers that comprised more than 10%; fiscal 2012 – no customers that comprised more than 10%).
40
BlackBerry Limited
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In millions of United States dollars, except share and per share data, and except as otherwise indicated
17. CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(a) Cash flows resulting from net changes in working capital items are as follows:
Accounts receivable
Other receivables
Inventories
Income taxes receivable
Other current assets
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Income taxes payable
Deferred revenue
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
$
1,381
$
124
359
224
(26)
(590)
(251)
—
38
$
1,259
$
709
218
426
(463)
(177)
296
(801)
—
279
487
$
$
898
(168)
(409)
(135)
(143)
(90)
(156)
(179)
151
(231)
(b) Certain statement of cash flow information related to interest and income taxes paid is summarized as follows:
Interest paid during the year
Income taxes paid during the year
Income tax refunds received during the year
(c) Additional information
For the year ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
$
29
$
— $
131
1,447
107
390
—
684
—
Advertising expense, which includes media, agency and promotional expenses totaling $843 million (March 2, 2013 -
$925 million; March 3, 2012 - $864 million) is included in selling, marketing and administration expenses for the fiscal
year ended March 1, 2014.
Selling, marketing and administration expense for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014 included $62 million with respect
to foreign exchange losses (March 2, 2013 – gain of $87 million; March 3, 2012 – loss of $40 million).
18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 21, 2014, the Company announced that it has entered into an agreement pursuant to which it will sell the
majority of its real estate holdings in Canada. The announced transaction is part of the Company's ongoing program to
improve operational efficiencies, optimize resource usage and shift resources to support operations as the business
continues to evolve.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will sell more than 3 million square feet of space as well as vacant lands.
The Company will also lease back a portion of the space. CBRE Limited served as an advisor to the Company for this
transaction. The agreement is expected to close in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The transaction is subject to certain
conditions, and the transaction may not be completed on the negotiated terms, or at all. Additional terms of the transaction
will be announced once the principal conditions are satisfied or waived by the parties.
41
BLACKBERRY LIMITED
Exhibit 1.3
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 1, 2014
March 28, 2014
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be
read together with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes (the “Consolidated Financial
Statements”) of BlackBerry Limited, formerly Research In Motion Limited (the “Company” or “BlackBerry”), for the fiscal
year ended March 1, 2014. The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in U.S. dollars and have been prepared in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). All financial information in this
MD&A is presented in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated.
The Company has prepared this MD&A with reference to National Instrument 51-102 “Continuous Disclosure Obligations” of
the Canadian Securities Administrators. Under the U.S./Canada Multijurisdictional Disclosure System, the Company is
permitted to prepare this MD&A in accordance with the disclosure requirements of Canada, which are different from those of
the United States. This MD&A provides information for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014 and up to and including March 28,
2014.
Additional information about the Company, including the Company’s Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended
March 1, 2014 (the “AIF”), which is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
March 1, 2014 (the “Annual Report”), can be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission’s (“SEC”) website at www.sec.gov.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This MD&A contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws, including under the U.S.
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities laws, including statements relating to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the Company’s plans, strategies and objectives, including the anticipated benefits of the strategic initiatives described
below, and the anticipated opportunities and challenges for the Company in fiscal 2015;
the Company’s expectations with respect to the sufficiency of its financial resources, including the Company's
anticipated receipt of a significant income tax refund in the first half of fiscal 2015;
the Company's expectations regarding targeting break-even cash flow results by the end of fiscal 2015 and reaching
profitability in fiscal 2016;
the Company’s expectations regarding new product initiatives and their timing, including BlackBerry Enterprise
Service (“BES”) 10, BES 12, BlackBerry 10 smartphones and services related to BlackBerry Messenger (“BBM”),
QNX software products and the QNX cloud-based machine to machine solution (the “QNX Cloud”);
the Company’s plans and expectations regarding its existing and new service offerings, assumptions regarding its
service revenue model, and the anticipated levels of decline in service revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2015;
anticipated demand for, and the Company’s plans and expectations relating to, the Company’s BlackBerry 7 and 10
smartphones, including programs to drive sell-through of these smartphones;
the Company’s ongoing efforts to streamline its operations and its expectations relating to the benefits of its Cost
Optimization and Resource Efficiency (“CORE”) program and similar strategies;
the Company's plans to continue implementation of a workforce reduction of approximately 4,500 positions;
the Company’s plans and expectations regarding marketing and promotional programs;
the Company’s estimates of purchase obligations and other contractual commitments; and
assumptions and expectations described in the Company’s critical accounting estimates and accounting policies.
The words “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “intend”, “believe”, “plan” and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements in this MD&A, including in the sections entitled “Overview”, “Overview -
CORE and Operational Restructuring”, “Overview - Strategic Initiatives”, “Fiscal 2014 Operating Results - Executive
Summary”, “Results of Continuing Operations - Fiscal year ended March 1, 2014 compared to fiscal year ended March 2, 2013
- Revenue - Revenue by Category - Service Revenue”, “Results of Continuing Operations - Fiscal year ended March 1, 2014
1
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
compared to fiscal year ended March 2, 2013 - Revenue - Revenue Trends”, “Summary Results of Continuing Operations -
Three months ended March 1, 2014 compared to three months ended March 2, 2013 - Revenue - Revenue by Category -
Service Revenue”, “Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Current Assets”, “Financial Condition - Liquidity
and Capital Resources - Investing Activities” and “Financial Condition - Credit Facilities and Other Funding Sources”.
Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions made by the Company in light of its experience and its
perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors that the Company
believes are appropriate in the circumstances, including but not limited to, the Company’s expectations regarding its business,
strategy, opportunities and prospects, including its ability to implement meaningful changes to address its business challenges,
the launch of products based on the BlackBerry 10 platform, general economic conditions, product pricing levels and
competitive intensity, supply constraints, and the Company’s expectations regarding the cash flow generation of its business
and the sufficiency of its financial resources. Many factors could cause the Company’s actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without
limitation, the following factors, most of which are discussed in greater detail in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s
AIF, which is included in the Company’s Annual Report. These factors should be considered carefully, and readers should not
place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
risks related to the Company's ability to implement and to realize the benefits of its strategic initiatives, including a
return to the Company's core strengths of enterprise and security, changes to the Company's Devices business,
including the new partnership with Foxconn Technology Group (“Foxconn”), and the planned transition to an
operating unit organizational structure consisting of the Devices business, Enterprise Services, QNX Embedded
business and Messaging;
the Company’s ability to maintain its existing relationships with its enterprise customers and the Company's ability
to transition its enterprise customers to the BES 10 platform and deploy BlackBerry 10 smartphones, and the risk
that current BES 10 test installations may not convert to commercial installations;
the Company's ability to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services in a timely
manner or at competitive prices, including risks related to new product introductions and adoption and the relevance
of hardware in light of the Company's decreasing market share of the smartphone industry;
the risk that uncertainty relating to the Company's previously disclosed announcements concerning the Company's
operational restructuring, recent management changes and the Company's workforce reductions, may adversely
impact the Company's business, existing and future relationships with business partners and end customers of its
products and services, and its ability to attract and retain key employees;
risks related to the Company’s ability to offset or mitigate the impact of the decline in the Company’s service access
fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering;
intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within the Company’s industry, including recent
and potential future strategic transactions by its competitors or carrier partners, which could continue to weaken the
Company’s competitive position or could continue to require the Company to reduce its prices to compete
effectively;
the Company's ability to adapt to, and realize the anticipated benefit of, its recent board of directors (“Board of
Directors”) and management changes;
the Company’s increasing reliance on third-party manufacturers for certain products and its ability to manage its
production and repair process, and risks related to the Company changing manufacturers or reducing the number of
manufacturers or suppliers it uses;
risks related to the Company's ability to implement and to realize the benefits of its previously-disclosed operational
restructuring initiatives, including the CORE program, and its ability to continue to realize cost reductions in the
future, including the Company's ongoing efforts to continue to implement a workforce reduction of approximately
4,500 positions by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015;
the risk that workforce reductions may result in a disruption to business critical processes and the effectiveness of
the Company's internal controls;
the Company’s ability to maintain its existing relationships with its network carrier partners and distributors, and its
reliance on its network carrier partners to help promote the BlackBerry 10 platform and BlackBerry 10 smartphones;
risks related to the Company’s ability to maintain or increase its liquidity, its existing cash balance, its ability to
access existing or potential alternative sources of funding, the sufficiency of its financial resources, and its ability to
service its debt;
•
risks related to the Company's significant indebtedness;
2
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
the Company’s ability to address inventory and asset risk, including its ability to sell its inventory of BlackBerry 10
products, manage its purchase obligations with its manufacturing partners and the potential for additional charges
related to its inventory, as well as its ability to mitigate inventory risk through its new partnership with Foxconn;
the potential for additional charges relating to the impairment of intangible assets recorded on the Company’s
balance sheet;
the occurrence or perception of a breach of the Company’s security measures, or an inappropriate disclosure of
confidential or personal information;
the Company’s ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand in light of recent challenges;
the efficient and uninterrupted operation of the Company's network operations center and the networks of its carrier
partners, and the risk of other business interruptions, including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and
reputational damage associated with service interruptions;
risks associated with the Company's foreign operations, including risks related to recent political and economic
developments in Venezuela and Argentina, and the impact of foreign currency restrictions that continue to impact its
ability to recognize revenue from sales of services in Venezuela and recently, Argentina;
general commercial litigation, class action and other litigation claims, including purported class action claims
relating to the Company or its operations;
risks associated with litigation claims against the Company arising from the Company’s practice of providing a
forward-looking outlook to its shareholders with respect to certain financial metrics, including the Company’s
practice of updating a previous outlook where circumstances warrant;
risks related to the failure of the Company’s suppliers, subcontractors, third-party distributors and representatives to
use acceptable ethical business practices or comply with applicable laws;
third-party claims for infringement of intellectual property rights by the Company and the outcome of any litigation
with respect thereto;
the Company’s ability to successfully obtain patent or other proprietary or statutory protection for its technologies
and products;
reliance on strategic alliances and relationships with third-party network infrastructure developers, software
platform vendors and service platform vendors, including the Company’s ability to promote and advance the
development of an ecosystem of applications and services for the BlackBerry 10 platform;
potential liabilities or costs related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure of user and personal
information;
the Company’s reliance on its suppliers for functional components, including the suppliers the Company has
selected for its BlackBerry 10 smartphones, and the risk that suppliers will not supply components on a timely basis,
in sufficient quantities or of the desired quality;
the Company’s ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third parties;
the Company’s ability to expand and manage BlackBerry® World™, including its ability to encourage developers to
continue to develop applications for BlackBerry® World™;
restrictions on import and use of the Company’s products and services in certain countries due to encryption of the
products and services;
the continued quality and reliability of the Company’s products and services and the potential effect of defects in
products and services;
risks as a result of actions of activist shareholders;
risks related to the Company possibly losing its foreign private issuer status under U.S. federal securities laws,
resulting in additional expenses associated with compliance with the U.S. securities laws applicable to U.S.
domestic issuers and inability to utilize certain benefits available to foreign private issuers;
government regulation of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies;
reduced spending by customers due to the uncertainty of economic and geopolitical conditions;
risks associated with acquisitions, investments and other business initiatives;
foreign exchange risks as the Company transacts globally in currencies other than the U.S. dollar;
regulation, certification and health risks, and risks relating to the misuse of the Company’s products;
tax liabilities, resulting from changes in tax laws or otherwise, associated with the Company’s worldwide
operations;
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
3
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
• market and credit risk associated with the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and short-term or long-term
investments;
•
•
the potential impact of copyright levies in numerous countries; and
costs and other burdens associated with recently adopted regulations regarding conflict minerals.
Any statements that are forward-looking statements are intended to enable the Company’s shareholders to view the anticipated
performance and prospects of the Company from management’s perspective at the time such statements are made, and they are
subject to the risks that are inherent in all forward-looking statements, as described above, as well as difficulties in forecasting
the Company’s financial results and performance for future periods, particularly over longer periods, given the ongoing
transition in the Company's business strategy and the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense
competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry. These difficulties in
forecasting the Company's financial results and performance are magnified at the present time given the uncertainties related to
the Company's operational restructuring, recent management changes and the strategic initiatives described in this MD&A. See
“Overview - CORE and Operational Restructuring”, “Overview - Strategic Review, Debenture Financing and Management
Changes”, and “Overview - Strategic Initiatives”.
The Company has no intention and undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Overview
A global leader in mobile communications, the Company revolutionized the mobile industry with the introduction of the
BlackBerry solution in 1999. Today, the Company aims to inspire the success of its millions of customers around the world by
continuously pushing the boundaries of mobile experiences. Founded in 1984 and based in Waterloo, Ontario, the Company
operates offices in North America, Europe, Middle East and Africa, Asia Pacific and Latin America. The Company’s common
shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ: BBRY) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: BB).
With the BlackBerry platform, the Company believes it offers a market-leading mobile communications experience with push-
based connectivity, industry-leading security and enterprise manageability, excellent radio performance and differentiated
social applications, such as BBM, that provide immediacy, productivity and collaboration. Historically, the wireless
communications market has been highly segmented. Where previously the market was segmented into distinct enterprise and
consumer/extreme productivity segments, the market has increasingly evolved in recent years and there is now significant
overlap between the segments. The enterprise market is now characterized by a combination of enterprise-deployed devices and
devices that are purchased by consumers but also used in the corporate environment, commonly referred to as “Bring Your
Own Device” or BYOD. These consumer devices are supported in a corporate environment by information technology (“IT”)
departments for access to corporate messaging and data applications. As the market has evolved, IT departments now look for
enterprise mobility solutions that can handle a range of requirements. The Company has introduced products to address this
market shift including BlackBerry 10 smartphones with BlackBerry Balance, BES 10 and the recently announced BES 12
platform, which will unify the support for BBOS and BlackBerry 10 devices, together with that for iOS, Android and Windows
Phone, as well as Secure Work Space, which give IT departments the ability to securely monitor and control multiple OS
platforms, and securely protect corporate data on an employee’s personal smartphone or tablet. The Company believes that it
remains the mobile device management leader and continues to see confidence from its customers through the increasing
penetration in BES 10, where the Company now has approximately 33,000 commercial and test servers installed to date, up
from 30,000 in December 2013. The Company’s latest devices are its BlackBerry 10 smartphone models, including the Z30,
Z10, Q10 and Q5, each with Long Term Evolution capability on next generation, “4G” networks. These 4G networks offer a
number of improvements over the previous generations, with improved download and upload speeds being the most widely
promoted. Wireless carriers in the United States have been aggressively deploying and marketing 4G networks. Deployment of
4G networks remains relatively limited globally, but wireless operators in many international markets are expected to move
aggressively to these new networks in the coming years.
The Company has experienced a significant decline in revenue and market share due to intense competition and other factors,
as discussed below under “Results of Continuing Operations – Three months ended March 1, 2014 compared to three months
ended March 2, 2013 – Revenue – Revenue Trends”. Some of the Company’s main device and enterprise competitors include
Apple Inc., Google Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., LG Electronics Mobile Communications Company, Lenovo Group
Ltd., HTC Corporation, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Microsoft Corporation, Nokia Corporation, ZTE Corporation, IBM
Corporation, SAP AG, Citrix Systems, Inc., VMware, Inc., Mobile Iron, Inc., and Good Technology Corporation. Competitors
of the Company's QNX business include Microsoft Corporation, Green Hills Software, Intel Corporation, MontaVista
Software, Mentor Graphics Corporation, and Sysgo AG. Products that compete with the Company's BBM service include
WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Skype, Line, iMessage, WeChat, Viber, Kik, Kakao Talk, Telegram and Snapchat.
4
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company has approximately $2.7 billion in cash, cash equivalents and investments as of March 1, 2014, including the
$1.25 billion of gross cash proceeds from the issuances of 6% unsecured subordinated convertible debentures on November 13,
2013 and January 16, 2014, as described below (the “Debentures”). In fiscal 2014, the Company had sales of $6.8 billion and
incurred a loss from continuing operations of $5.9 billion, or $11.18 per share diluted. The loss reflects a non-cash, pre-tax net
charge against long-lived assets of approximately $2.7 billion, primarily non-cash, pre-tax charges against inventory and supply
commitments of approximately $2.4 billion, pre-tax restructuring charges of $512 million related to the CORE program as well
as financial and legal advisory and other consulting costs related to the Company's strategic review process and a non-cash net
charge associated with the change in the fair value of the Debentures of $377 million recorded in fiscal 2014. See “Non-GAAP
Financial Measures”, “Overview – Long-Lived Asset Impairment Charge”, “Overview – Inventory Charges”, “Overview –
CORE and Operational Restructuring” and “Overview – Debentures Fair Value Adjustment”.
CORE and Operational Restructuring
As part of the Company's operational and strategic review, the Company commenced the CORE program in March 2012. The
CORE program is a Company-wide initiative with the objective of streamlining the Company's operations and increasing
efficiency. The program includes, among other things, the optimization of the Company's global manufacturing footprint to
reduce complexity and improve delivery performance, the outsourcing of global repair services, the alignment of the
Company's sales and marketing teams to prioritize marketing efforts to effectively leverage its marketing windows and a
reduction in the global workforce, including a reduction in the number of layers of management to reduce complexity, drive
accelerated execution and decision making, improve performance and increase the transparency of accountability. The
Company continued to execute on the planned headcount reductions in fiscal 2014. Through the CORE program, the Company
reported significant savings in fiscal 2014 and has implemented plans to sustain the majority of savings in fiscal 2015. The
Company incurred charges related to the CORE program as well as the strategic review process of approximately $512 million
in fiscal 2014, including $148 million incurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
As part of the CORE program and operational restructuring, the Company has been reviewing all aspects of its operations,
including the sale of certain assets. In fiscal 2014, certain assets were classified as held for sale and are presented separately on
the Company's consolidated balance sheet until they are disposed. Assets held for sale include property, plant and equipment
and intangible assets that are expected to be sold within the next twelve months.
The Company previously announced that it was targeting an approximate 50% reduction in operating expenditures by the end
of the first quarter of fiscal 2015, compared to its first quarter of fiscal 2014 run rate. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the
Company achieved this target and reduced quarterly operating expenditures by approximately 51% compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2014. As previously communicated, the Company is continuing to implement a workforce reduction of
approximately 4,500 positions to bring the total workforce to approximately 7,000 full-time employees (the Company had
approximately 8,000 full-time employees at March 1, 2014). The Company expects to incur approximately $100 million in
additional cash and non-cash, pre-tax charges related to the CORE program by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015.
Beyond the first quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company plans to further streamline its operations and reduce its controllable spend
cost base as it continues its transformation.
Strategic Review, Debenture Financing and Management Changes
On August 12, 2013, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had formed a Special Committee to explore strategic
alternatives to enhance value and increase scale in order to accelerate BlackBerry 10 deployment. The Special Committee
engaged in a process to review potential alternatives, with the assistance of its financial and legal advisors, which included
possible joint ventures, strategic partnerships or alliances, a sale of the Company or other possible transactions. While the
Special Committee focused on exploring alternatives, the Company continued with its strategy of reducing cost, driving
efficiency and accelerating the deployment of BES 10, as well as driving adoption of BlackBerry 10 smartphones, working
towards launching the multi-platform BBM social messaging service, and pursuing mobile computing opportunities by
leveraging the secure and reliable BlackBerry Global Data Network.
On September 23, 2013, the Company announced that it had signed a letter of intent (the “LOI”) with Fairfax Financial
Holdings Limited (“Fairfax”), a Canadian company led by Prem Watsa, under which a consortium to be led by Fairfax (the
“Fairfax Consortium”) proposed to acquire the Company subject to due diligence. The LOI contemplated a transaction in which
the Company's shareholders would receive $9 in cash for each common share of the Company they held, in a transaction valued
at approximately $4.7 billion. The LOI contemplated that the Fairfax Consortium would acquire for cash all of the outstanding
shares of BlackBerry not held by Fairfax. Fairfax, which owned at the time, approximately 9.9% of the Company's outstanding
common shares, intended to contribute the shares of BlackBerry it held into the transaction. The Board of Directors, acting on
the recommendation of the Special Committee, approved the terms of the LOI. Completion of the transaction was subject to a
number of conditions, including due diligence, negotiation and execution of a definitive agreement by November 4, 2013 and
customary regulatory and shareholder approvals.
5
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
On November 4, 2013, the Company announced that, in lieu of the transaction contemplated by the LOI, it had entered into an
agreement pursuant to which Fairfax and other institutional investors (collectively, the “Purchasers”) would subscribe for $1
billion aggregate principal amount of Debentures, with an option to purchase an additional $250 million principal amount of
Debentures. The initial $1 billion investment of Debentures was completed on November 13, 2013, and the option to purchase
the additional $250 million of Debentures was completed on January 16, 2014. The Debentures are convertible into common
shares of BlackBerry at a price of $10.00 per common share, which was a 28.7% premium to the closing price of BlackBerry
common shares on November 1, 2013. The Debentures have a term of seven years. Fairfax, a related party, owns $500 million
principal amount of Debentures and receives interest at the same rate as other debenture holders. Based on the number of
common shares outstanding at March 1, 2014, if all of the $1.25 billion of Debentures were converted, the common shares
issued upon conversion would represent approximately 19.2% of the common shares outstanding after giving effect to the
conversion.
The announcement of the initial tranche of the Debenture financing on November 4, 2013 marked the conclusion of the review
of strategic alternatives previously announced on August 12, 2013.
Upon closing of the Debenture financing on November 13, 2013, John S. Chen was appointed Executive Chair of BlackBerry's
Board of Directors and, in that role, is responsible for the strategic direction, strategic relationships and organizational goals of
BlackBerry. Thorsten Heins stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Chen was named Interim Chief Executive
Officer. Prem Watsa was appointed Lead Director and Chair of the Compensation, Nomination and Governance Committee,
and Thorsten Heins and David Kerr resigned from the Board of Directors.
In addition, the Company made additional significant organizational and personnel changes. On November 25, 2013, the
Company announced the resignation of Roger Martin as a director, and the departures of Kristian Tear, Chief Operating Officer,
and Frank Boulben, Chief Marketing Officer. On the same day, the Company announced that James Yersh had replaced Brian
Bidulka as its Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Bidulka was retained as a special advisor to the Chief Executive Officer for the
remainder of fiscal 2014 to assist with the transition. The Company also announced the following executive officer
appointments during fiscal 2014: on December 17, 2013, John Sims as President, Global Enterprise Services; on December 18,
2013, James S. Mackey as Executive Vice President for Corporate Development and Strategic Planning and Mark Wilson as
Senior Vice President, Marketing (effective January 2014); on January 6, 2014, Ron Louks as President, Devices and Emerging
Solutions; and on January 13, 2014, Eric Johnson as President, Global Sales. The Company believes that these changes will
help it continue its transition and focus on its principal strategic initiatives.
Strategic Initiatives
On December 20, 2013, the Company announced that it intends to focus on three key strategic initiatives: (1) returning the
Company to its core strengths of enterprise and security; (2) implementing changes in the Company’s Devices business to
provide operational flexibility to meet the needs of its customers and to mitigate the financial risk to the Company; and (3) its
planned transition to an operating unit organizational structure consisting of the Devices business, Enterprise Services, QNX
Embedded business and Messaging.
(1) Focus on Enterprise and Security
The Company is renewing its focus on its core strengths of enterprise and security, with a greater focus on regulated industry
customers in the government, financial services, medical and telecommunications sectors. The Company expects this renewed
focus to include additional investments in advanced security capabilities and an expansion of the Company’s product and
service offerings in the enterprise space through both organic investment and potential acquisitions of complementary
businesses and assets. The Company is further investing in its enterprise sales force and focus their efforts on regulated
industries.
(2) Changes to the Devices business
The Company is implementing changes to its hardware model, which has involved, in part, an improved approach to
manufacturing to meet the needs of the Company’s customers. The Company’s joint device development and manufacturing
agreement with Foxconn demonstrates BlackBerry’s commitment to the device market for the long-term and its determination
to remain the innovation leader in secure end-to-end wireless solutions. Under this new partnership, Foxconn is jointly
developing and manufacturing certain new BlackBerry devices and managing the inventory associated with those devices.
The initial focus of the partnership is the recently announced Z3 smartphone for Indonesia and other fast-growing markets,
expected to launch in the spring of 2014. The devices manufactured by Foxconn will be purchased and resold by BlackBerry.
The Company expects that the partnership with Foxconn will enable the Company to focus on iconic design, world-class
security, software development and enterprise mobility management while simultaneously addressing fast-growing markets,
leveraging Foxconn’s scale, efficiency and supply chain to allow the Company to compete more effectively while reducing the
Company's inventory risk. The Company’s new hardware model will also strive to provide a supply chain with speed
6
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
advantages in designing for faster product life cycles, as well as to leverage scale and manufacturing strength beyond current
volumes.
(3) Planned Transition to Operating Unit Organizational Structure
The Company has announced that it is planning to transition to an operating unit organizational structure consisting of the
Devices business, Enterprise Services, QNX Embedded business and Messaging. BlackBerry offerings in each of the four areas
are differentiated and positioned around key themes such as security, productivity and communications. Based on the
Company’s broad product portfolio and areas of differentiation, BlackBerry’s current focus is on serving enterprise customers,
particularly in regulated industries including financial services, government and healthcare. The Company’s goal is to maintain
its market leadership in the enterprise mobility segment by continuing to extend the functionality of its BES infrastructure
beyond enterprise mobility management, to include application management, application enablement and application
development and, on top of this extensive foundation, deliver additional horizontal and vertical applications. To achieve this
vision, BlackBerry plans to align its businesses and operations around the four core areas to drive greater efficiency and speed
in bringing new offerings to market, while optimizing assets and capabilities across all businesses in support of the Company’s
overall strategy and financial objectives.
The four core areas of business focus are as follows:
Devices business
BlackBerry’s strategy in its Devices business is focused on delivering smartphone products that highlight BlackBerry
technology strengths and areas of differentiation, in alignment with specific market opportunities and target segments. As a
result, the Company expects to offer choice to both the enterprise and consumer markets through a portfolio of premium,
affordable, QWERTY and full-touch smartphone products. This portfolio will continue to include the manufacture and sale of
BlackBerry 7 smartphones for as long as there is demand for these products in the market. As described above, to drive cost
and operational efficiencies, BlackBerry has entered into a joint device development and manufacturing agreement with
Foxconn. The initial focus of this partnership is the development in early 2014 of the BlackBerry Z3, an all-touch BlackBerry
10 smartphone designed for Indonesia and other fast-growing markets. The partnership will also deliver the BlackBerry Classic
(initially announced as the Q20), a device targeted for BlackBerry loyalists. This device will feature classic BlackBerry features
such as the QWERTY keyboard, track pad and utility belt and classic BlackBerry user experiences and battery life.
The Company is focused on driving continued adoption of the BlackBerry 10 OS as a leading mobile platform. The Company
expects that the BlackBerry 10 OS will transition the Company from mobile communications into true mobile computing.
Expansion of the BlackBerry partner ecosystem and the development of end-to-end offerings that leverage the BlackBerry
product portfolio are also key elements of the Company’s strategy to re-capture market share in the Devices business.
Enterprise Services
BlackBerry believes it has the largest installed base in the mobile device management (“MDM”) market through its BES
platform. Security, reliability and productivity are hallmark strengths of the BES platform and are instrumental to its success in
the enterprise market, particularly in regulated industries. BlackBerry intends to maintain and strengthen its position as a
market leader in the enterprise market through a variety of strategies, including building a high-touch enterprise sales force,
focused marketing campaigns, an expanded partner ecosystem and the identification of alternative sales channels. In line with
this focus, BlackBerry continues to enhance its enterprise offerings and long-term product strategy. New pricing and migration
programs are now available to ease and accelerate customer migration to the BES 10 platform, such as the recently announced
EZ pass program that will enable customers to move from BES and other MDM programs to BES 10 or BES 12 at the silver
level of service for free. In addition, the Company has announced the next-generation BES 12 platform, which will unify the
support for BBOS and BlackBerry 10 devices, together with that for iOS, Android and Windows Phone. The Company's
solutions will maintain a key focus on security, productivity and collaboration. The BES 12 platform is in development with
significant enhancements to include enhanced multi-platform support, an enhanced architecture for on-premise and cloud
deployments and backwards compatibility allowing unification of prior versions of BES. BES 12 will allow businesses to
manage the growing IT trend of securely supporting multiple devices and operating systems, as well as employees’ personal
devices, within a single corporate IT infrastructure. BlackBerry intends to have a continued strategic focus on regulated
industries that rely on stringent security needs, as well as on the government market where BlackBerry is the only MDM
provider to obtain “authority to operate” and “full operational capability” status with the U.S. DoD. Longer term, the Company
plans to focus on additional value-added services to further enhance BlackBerry’s enterprise offerings. For example, the
Company has announced the planned launch of eBBM Suite, a family of products and services to provide secure, enterprise-
class mobile messaging. BlackBerry also intends to leverage its strengths and expand further into new strategic vertical
markets.
7
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
QNX Embedded business
Over the past 30 years, QNX software has become a significant part of everyday life, with people encountering QNX-
controlled systems while driving, shopping, watching television, using the Internet, or even turning on a light. QNX technology
is deployed by over 40 automotive original equipment manufacturers in more than 250 vehicle platforms in tens of millions of
vehicles throughout North America, Europe and Asia. Based on its proven technology and reputation for reliability, QNX
technology is a preferred choice for mission-critical, secure, life safety-critical systems such as air traffic control systems,
medical imaging equipment, and nuclear power plants. QNX enables powerful multimedia features and can be found in a
variety of products from automotive infotainment systems to casino gaming terminals. The Company sees the opportunity to
leverage its full product portfolio, including QNX, to develop machine-to-machine applications to enable a world of ever-more
connected wireless devices and plans to address this emerging market with the introduction of the QNX Cloud platform in
fiscal 2015.
Messaging
The Company is focused on expanding its base of approximately 85 million BBM users through platform enhancements and
cross-platform support. The latest release of BBM delivered numerous new features such as free voice calling over Wi-Fi, one-
click sharing of files and photos, Dropbox integration, location sharing and BBM Channels, among others. BBM Channels
extends the popular BBM experience to brands, artists, businesses and communities, connecting consumers and groups in real-
time. BBM is now available on iOS and Android platforms, in addition to BlackBerry 10, responding to smartphone users'
desire to be able to connect to all of their friends and family, regardless of the smartphone they carry. Future BBM releases will
be made available to Windows Phone and Nokia X customers, as announced in February 2014. The Company has also
announced that BBM will be pre-loaded on LG smartphones in markets around the world and a variety of Android-based
smartphones from leading OEMs across Africa, India, Indonesia, Latin America and the Middle East. The Company believes
that a corresponding increase in the user base for the BBM service could lead to increased opportunities for monetization of the
services offered through the platform, through advertising or through the implementation of the solutions by enterprise
customers.
The Company also announced the eBBM Suite, a new family of products and services that work with BlackBerry smartphones
and the BlackBerry enterprise solution, BES and BES 10, to provide enterprise-class mobile messaging that brings together the
core strengths of BBM with features and capabilities aimed at enterprises. BBM Protected will be the first solution offered in
the eBBM Suite and the Company believes it will provide regulated industries the most secure and reliable real-time mobile
messaging in the industry.
Sources of Revenue
The Company’s primary revenue stream is generated by the BlackBerry wireless solution, which includes sales of BlackBerry®
handheld devices, services and software. The BlackBerry wireless solution provides users with a wireless extension of their
work and personal email accounts, including Microsoft® Outlook®, IBM® Lotus Notes®, Novell® GroupWise® and many ISP
email services.
The Company generates hardware revenues from sales, primarily to carriers and distributors, of BlackBerry handheld devices,
which provide users with the ability to send and receive wireless messages and data. The Company’s BlackBerry handheld
devices also incorporate a mobile phone, web-browsing and multimedia capabilities and enable the use of data functions such
as calendar, address book, task and memo lists and other functions associated with personal organizers. During fiscal 2014, the
Company continued to launch new BlackBerry 10 smartphones including the BlackBerry Q10, Q5 and Z30 as well as
BlackBerry 7 devices such as the BlackBerry 9720. Customer adoption of the Company’s next-generation BlackBerry 10
platform and the delivery of high quality, full-featured BlackBerry 10 smartphones remain one of the Company’s top priorities.
The Company currently generates service revenue from billings to its BlackBerry subscriber account base that utilize
BlackBerry 7 and prior BlackBerry operating systems primarily from a monthly infrastructure access fee (sometimes referred
to as a “service access fee” or “SAF”) charged to carriers or resellers, who in turn bill the BlackBerry subscriber. The SAF for
consumer customers historically has been much lower than the SAF for enterprise customers, who receive a higher level of
value-added security, encryption and other services by utilizing the Company’s BES platform.
Many of the Company’s competitors do not charge a SAF or equivalent fee as they recover their infrastructure and services
expense in alternate manners. Thus, the Company has faced significant pressure to reduce its existing SAF, especially for the
consumer market. In response to these pressures, the Company has been implementing certain price reduction programs in an
effort to maintain and grow its subscriber base.
As customers continue to transition to BlackBerry 10, the Company expects SAF revenue to decline further, but expects to
generate revenues to mitigate the loss of the enterprise portion of SAF revenue from enterprise customers that elect to utilize
BES 10, BES 12 and other new products and services. The Company continues to be focused on developing additional
8
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
integrated BlackBerry 10 service offerings focused on enterprise customers that leverage the Company’s strengths such as
BBM, security and manageability to generate new service revenue streams. Customers that require enhanced services,
including advanced security, mobile device management, secure enterprise instant messaging and other services, are expected
to continue to generate monthly service revenue. Other customers who do not utilize such services are expected to generate less
or no service revenue. The Company believes that offering alternative levels of service and pricing will better meet the needs of
its customers. In addition, the Company believes that by offering these services it may be able to expand the size of its
addressable market for recurring service revenue. The Company believes this strategy will help broaden the BlackBerry
ecosystem over time, which will potentially give the Company and its application developers access to a broader market into
which to sell their respective services.
The Company expects the transition from BlackBerry 7 to BlackBerry 10 to continue to be gradual, given that the Company
has a diversified global customer base, many of whom are in markets that are expected to transition more slowly to “4G”
wireless networks. As a result of the changes and the pressure to reduce its SAF as described above, the Company anticipates
further declines in service revenue in the coming quarters, which could be significant. The Company cannot predict this
anticipated rate of decline with any degree of certainty, as it depends on a number of factors, including the outcome of
negotiations with the Company’s carrier customers and distribution partners, the rate at which current BlackBerry 6 and
BlackBerry 7 customers migrate to BlackBerry 10 and use only standard BlackBerry services, the Company’s ability to attract
existing and new enterprise customers to use the enhanced services offered by BlackBerry 10, the Company’s ability to
continue charging SAF for its BlackBerry 6 and BlackBerry 7 products, and the Company’s ability to successfully develop over
a transition period a compelling integrated services and software offering that generates new service and software revenues
from the BlackBerry 10 platform.
The Company also generated revenue from the embedded market through licensing QNX software products and providing
professional services to support customers in developing their products.
An important part of the Company’s BlackBerry wireless solution is the software that is installed at the corporate or small- and
medium-size enterprise server level, and in some cases, on personal computers. Software revenues include fees from licensing
the Company’s BES software, BlackBerry® Client Access Licenses (“CALs”), which are charged for each subscriber using the
BlackBerry service via a BES, maintenance and upgrades to software and technical support.
Revenues are also generated from non-warranty repairs and sales of accessories.
Long-Lived Asset Impairment Charge
During fiscal 2014, the Company experienced a significant decline in its share price following its pre-release of its second
quarter fiscal 2014 results on September 20, 2013, as well as its announcement on November 4, 2013 that the Purchasers were
investing in the Company through the $1.0 billion private placement of Debentures in lieu of finalizing the purchase of the
Company as contemplated in the previously-announced LOI. The Company further identified the continuing decline in
revenues, the generation of operating losses and the decrease in cash flows from operations as indicators of potential long-lived
asset (“LLA”) impairment. Further, the Company believes that its recently completed strategic review process may have
increased market uncertainty as to the future viability of the Company and may have negatively impacted demand for the
Company's products. Accordingly, a cash flow recoverability test was performed as of November 4, 2013 (the “Measurement
Date”). The estimated undiscounted net cash flows were determined utilizing the Company's internal forecast and incorporated
a terminal value of the Company utilizing its market capitalization, calculated as the number of the Company's common shares
outstanding as at the interim testing date by the average market price of the shares over a 10 day period following the
Measurement Date. The Company used this duration in order to incorporate the inherent market fluctuations that may affect
any individual closing price of the Company's shares. As a result, the Company concluded that the carrying value of its net
assets exceeded the undiscounted net cash flows as at the Measurement Date. Consequently, step two of the LLA impairment
test was performed whereby the fair values of the Company's assets were compared to their carrying values. As a result, the
Company recorded a non-cash, pre-tax charge against its LLA (the “LLA Impairment Charge”) of $2.7 billion ($2.5 billion
after tax, $4.71 per share diluted), in fiscal 2014. Significant judgment was required in calculating the LLA Impairment Charge.
See “Critical Accounting Estimates - Valuation of LLA”, “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and
the “Risk Factors” section of the AIF, which is included in the Annual Report, including the risk factors titled “The Company
may be required to record long-lived asset impairment charges, which could adversely impact the Company’s financial results”
and “The Company faces substantial inventory and other asset risk, including risks related to its ability to sell its inventory of
BlackBerry 10 products, manage its purchase obligations with its manufacturing partners and the potential for additional
charges related to its inventory, as well as risks related to its ability to mitigate inventory risk through its new partnership with
Foxconn”.
9
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Inventory Charges
During fiscal 2014, the Company shipped devices to its carrier and distributor partners to support new and continuing product
launches and meet expected levels of end customer demand. However, the sell-through levels for BlackBerry 10 smartphones
decreased significantly during fiscal 2014 due to the maturing smartphone market, very intense competition and, the Company
believes, the uncertainty created by the Company's recently completed strategic review process. These factors caused the
number of BlackBerry 10 devices in the channel to increase above the Company's expectations, which in turn caused the
Company to reassess and revise its future demand assumptions for finished products, semi-finished goods and raw materials.
The Company also made the decision to cancel plans to launch two devices to mitigate the identified inventory risk. Based on
these revised demand assumptions, the Company recorded primarily non-cash, pre-tax charges against inventory and supply
commitments of approximately $934 million ($666 million after tax, or $1.27 per share diluted), which was primarily
attributable to BlackBerry Z10 devices (the “Z10 Inventory Charge”) in the second quarter of fiscal 2014, and approximately
$1.6 billion ($1.3 billion after tax, or $2.56 per share diluted), which was primarily attributable to BlackBerry 10 devices (the
“Q3 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge”) in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. The Z10 Inventory Charge and the Q3 Fiscal 2014
Inventory Charge were subsequently adjusted in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 to reflect increased sell through rates, relative
to the estimates and assumptions previously considered, resulting from discounted pricing and revised orders on hand for
devices and components of BlackBerry 10 products, resulting in a reduction of the original charges incurred of approximately
$149 million ($106 million after tax, or $0.20 per share diluted), which was recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 (the “Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery”).
Debentures Fair Value Adjustment
The Company elected the fair value option to account for the Debentures, therefore periodic revaluation is required under U.S.
GAAP. The valuation is influenced by a number of embedded features within the Debentures, such as the Company’s put
option on the debt and the conversion option for the investors, among others. The primary factors that influence the fair value
adjustment are the Company’s share price as well as associated volatility driven by the fluctuation of the Company’s share
price. The fair value adjustment charge does not impact the key terms of the Debentures such as the face value, the redemption
features or the conversion price. In fiscal 2014, the Company recorded a non-cash charge associated with the change in the fair
value of the Debentures of approximately $377 million, including a $382 million ($382 million after tax, or $0.73 per share
diluted) charge in the fourth quarter (the “Q4 Fiscal 2014 Debentures Fair Value Adjustment”), partially offset by a gain of $5
million recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2014.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and information contained in this
MD&A is presented on that basis. On March 28, 2014, the Company announced financial results for fiscal 2014, which
included certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted gross margin, adjusted gross margin percentage, adjusted
loss from continuing operations before taxes, adjusted loss from continuing operations and adjusted diluted loss per share from
continuing operations that excluded the pre-tax LLA Impairment Charge of $2.7 billion ($2.5 billion after tax), the pre-tax Q3
Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge of $1.6 billion ($1.3 billion after tax), the pre-tax Z10 Inventory Charge of $934 million ($666
million after tax), pre-tax restructuring charges of $512 million ($398 million after tax) related to the CORE program as well as
financial and legal advisory and other consulting costs related to the Company's strategic review process, the Debentures Fair
Value Adjustment of $382 million ($382 million after tax) and the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery of $149 million ($106
million after tax) incurred in fiscal 2014. Similar non-GAAP financial measures were included in the Company’s presentation
of its financial results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. Certain of these charges and other items are presented in the table
below. The Company believes that presenting non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the impact of those items enables it
and its shareholders to better assess the Company’s operating performance relative to its consolidated financial results in prior
and future periods and improves the comparability of the information presented. Readers are cautioned that adjusted gross
margin, adjusted gross margin percentage, adjusted loss from continuing operations before taxes, adjusted loss from continuing
operations, adjusted diluted loss per share from continuing operations and similar measures do not have any standardized
meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP and are therefore unlikely to be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in the context of the U.S. GAAP results, which are
described in this MD&A. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP
measures was included in the Company’s press release, dated March 28, 2014, and is reflected in the table below.
10
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
As reported
LLA Impairment Charge
Q3 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge
Z10 Inventory Charge
CORE program charges
Debentures Fair Value Adjustment
Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery
Adjusted
For the Fiscal Year Ended
Loss from
continuing
operations before
income taxes
Loss from
continuing
operations
Diluted loss per
share from
continuing
operations
Gross Margin
$
$
(43) $
—
1,592
934
103
—
(149)
2,437 $
(7,184) $
2,748
1,592
934
512
382
(149)
(1,165) $
(5,873) $
2,475
1,347
666
398
382
(106)
(711) $
(11.18)
4.71
2.56
1.27
0.76
0.73
(0.20)
(1.35)
Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates
Accounting Policies
Please see Note 1 of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Company's significant
accounting policies, which is included in the Company’s Annual Report.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions with
respect to the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. These estimates and assumptions are based upon management’s historical experience and are believed by
management to be reasonable under the circumstances. Such estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis and
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
The Company’s critical accounting estimates have been reviewed and discussed with the Company’s Audit & Risk
Management Committee and are set out below. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Except as noted below, there have not been any changes to the Company’s critical
accounting estimates during the past three fiscal years.
Valuation of LLA
The LLA impairment test prescribed by U.S. GAAP requires the Company to identify its asset groups and test impairment of
each asset group separately. To conduct the LLA impairment test, the asset group is tested for recoverability using
undiscounted cash flows over the remaining useful life of the primary asset. If forecasted net cash flows are less than the
carrying amount of the asset group, an impairment charge is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset group to its
carrying value. Determining the Company's asset groups and related primary assets requires significant judgment by
management. Different judgments could yield different results.
The Company's determination of its asset groups, its primary asset and its remaining useful life, and estimated cash flows are
significant factors in assessing the recoverability of the Company's assets for the purposes of LLA impairment testing. The
Company's share price can be affected by, among other things, changes in industry or market conditions, including the effect of
competition, changes in the Company's results of operations, changes in the Company's forecasts or market expectations
relating to future results, and the Company's strategic initiatives and the market's assessment of any such factors. See “Risk
Factors - The market price of the Company's common shares is volatile” in the Company's AIF. The current macroeconomic
environment and competitive dynamics continue to be challenging to the Company's business and the Company cannot be
certain of the duration of these conditions and their potential impact on the Company's future financial results and cash flows. A
continued decline in the Company's performance, the Company's market capitalization and future changes to the Company's
assumptions and estimates used in the LLA impairment test, particularly the expected future cash flows, remaining useful life
of the primary asset and terminal value of the asset group, may result in further impairment charges in future periods of some or
all of the assets on the Company's balance sheet. Although it does not affect the Company's cash flow, an impairment charge to
earnings has the effect of decreasing the Company's earnings or increasing the Company's losses, as the case may be. The
Company's share price could also be adversely affected by the Company's recorded LLA impairment charges.
11
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company used various valuation techniques to determine the fair values of its assets to measure and allocate impairment.
Techniques related to real estate, capital equipment and intangible assets included the direct capitalization method, market
comparable transactions, the replacement cost method, discounted cash flow analysis, as well as the relief from royalty and
excess earnings valuation methods. Determining valuations using these valuation techniques requires significant judgement
and assumptions by management. Different judgements could yield different results.
In fiscal 2014, the Company recorded the LLA Impairment Charge. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “Overview -
Long-Lived Asset Impairment Charge”.
Inventory and Inventory Purchase Commitments
The Company’s policy for the valuation of inventory, including the determination of obsolete or excess inventory, requires
management to estimate the future demand for the Company’s products. Inventory purchases and purchase commitments are
based upon such forecasts of future demand and scheduled rollout and life cycles of new products. The business environment
in which the Company operates is subject to rapid changes in technology and customer demand. The Company performs an
assessment of inventory during each reporting period, which includes a review of, among other factors, demand requirements,
component part purchase commitments of the Company and certain key suppliers, product life cycle and development plans,
component cost trends, product pricing and quality issues. If customer demand subsequently differs from the Company’s
forecasts, requirements for inventory write-offs that differ from the Company’s estimates could become necessary. If
management believes that demand no longer allows the Company to sell inventories above cost or at all, such inventory is
written down to net realizable value or excess inventory is written off.
Significant judgment was required in calculating the inventory charges, which involved forecasting future demand and the
associated pricing at which the Company can realize the carrying value of its inventory. Further, the Company’s expectations
with respect to its inventory and asset risk (including its ability to sell its inventory of BlackBerry 10 products and manage its
purchase obligations with its manufacturing partners) and the potential for additional charges related to inventory are forward-
looking statements that are subject to the inherent risk of forecasting the Company’s financial results and performance for
future periods, particularly over longer periods, given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense
competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry. As noted above, these
difficulties in forecasting the Company's financial results and performance are magnified at the present time given the
uncertainties related to the Company's operational restructuring, recent management changes and the strategic initiatives
described in this MD&A. See “Overview - CORE and Operational Restructuring”, “Overview - Strategic Review, Debenture
Financing and Management Changes”, “Overview - Strategic Initiatives”, “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements” and the “Risk Factors” section of the AIF, which is included in the Annual Report, including the risk factors titled
“Intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within the Company’s industry, including potential future
strategic transactions by its competitors or carrier partners, could continue to weaken the Company’s competitive position or
may continue to require the Company to reduce its prices to compete effectively” and “The Company faces substantial
inventory and other asset risk, including risks related to its ability to sell its inventory of BlackBerry 10 products, manage its
purchase obligations with its manufacturing partners and the potential for additional charges related to its inventory, as well as
risks related to its ability to mitigate inventory risk through its new partnership with Foxconn.”
In fiscal 2014, the Company recorded the Z10 Inventory Charge, the Q3 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge and the Q4 Fiscal 2014
Inventory Recovery. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “Overview - Inventory Charges”.
Valuation Allowance Against Deferred Tax Assets
The Company regularly assesses the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is
required for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the asset will not be realized. All available
evidence, both positive and negative, that may affect the realization of deferred tax assets must be identified and considered in
determining the appropriate amount of the valuation allowance. Additionally, for interim periods, the estimated annual
effective tax rate should include the valuation allowance for current year changes in temporary differences and losses or income
arising during the year. For interim periods, the Company needs to consider the valuation allowance that it expects to
recognize at the end of the fiscal year as part of the estimated annual effective tax rate. During interim quarters, the Company
uses estimates including pre-tax results and ending position of temporary differences as at the end of the fiscal year to estimate
the valuation allowance that it expects to recognize at the end of the fiscal year. This accounting treatment has no effect on the
Company’s actual ability to utilize deferred tax assets to reduce future cash tax payments. Different judgments could yield
different results. See “Results of Continuing Operations - Three months ended March 1, 2014 compared to three months ended
March 2, 2013 - Income Taxes”.
Assets Held for Sale
The Company applies judgment in determining whether the criteria for reclassifying assets as held for sale are met including
the assessment of sale leaseback arrangements included in the plan to sell. Further, in determining fair values less costs to sell,
12
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
the Company utilizes third party appraisals, based on discounted cash flow or market comparable valuation approaches.
The Company estimates costs to sell based on historical costs incurred for similar transactions. Should any of the estimates
change, or if the actual proceeds of disposal differ from the estimate of fair value, it could have a material impact on earnings.
Adoption of Accounting Policies
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance to improve the reporting of
reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”). The guidance requires an entity to present
changes in AOCI by component and report the effect of significant reclassifications out of AOCI on the respective line items in
net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For
other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting
period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about
those amounts. The new authoritative guidance became effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after
December 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. As a
result, the Company presents, by component, changes in AOCI and the effect of significant reclassifications out of AOCI on the
respective line items in net income in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance to eliminate diversity in practice related
to the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss,
or a tax credit carryforward exists. The guidance requires that under certain circumstances, an unrecognized tax benefit is to be
presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset as opposed to being presented as a liability. The new
authoritative guidance will become effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013,
with early adoption and retrospective application permitted. The Company has adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2014. As a result, the Company has presented the unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction to the deferred tax asset in the
consolidated balance sheets.
13
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Fiscal 2014 Operating Results – Executive Summary
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statement of operations data, which is expressed in millions of dollars, for
the periods indicated, except for share and per share amounts, as well as certain consolidated balance sheet data, as at March 1,
2014, March 2, 2013, and March 3, 2012, which is expressed in millions of dollars.
As at and for the Fiscal Year Ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
Change Fiscal
2014/2013
March 3, 2012
Change Fiscal
2013/2012
(in millions, except for share and per share amounts)
$
6,813
$
11,073
$
(4,260) $
(783)
(3,477)
18,423
$
11,848
6,575
Revenue(1)
Cost of sales(2)(3)(4)
Gross margin
Operating expenses
Research and development(2)
Selling, marketing and
administration (2)
Amortization
Impairment of long-lived assets (5)
Impairment of goodwill(6)(7)
Debenture fair value adjustment(8)
Operating income (loss)
Investment income (loss)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes(9)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations
Net income (loss)
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
from continuing operations
Basic and diluted loss per share from
discontinued operations
Total basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share
Weighted-average number of shares
outstanding (000’s)
Basic
Diluted
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total long-term liabilities
Shareholders’ equity
$
$
$
$
6,856
(43)
1,286
2,103
606
2,748
—
377
7,120
(7,163)
(21)
(7,184)
(1,311)
(5,873)
—
(5,873) $
7,639
3,434
1,509
2,111
714
—
335
—
4,669
(1,235)
15
(223)
(8)
(108)
2,748
(335)
377
2,451
(5,928)
(36)
(1,220)
(592)
(628)
(18)
(646) $
(5,964)
(719)
(5,245)
18
(5,227) $
(11.18) $
(1.20)
—
(0.03)
(11.18) $
(1.23)
$
$
525,168
525,168
524,160
524,160
7,552
$
13,165
$
3,927
1,659
3,625
3,705
245
9,460
524,101
524,190
13,731
3,631
242
10,100
(5,613) $
222
1,414
(5,835)
(7,350)
(4,209)
(3,141)
(47)
(489)
147
—
(20)
—
(409)
(2,732)
(6)
(2,738)
(939)
(1,799)
(11)
(1,810)
(566)
74
3
(640)
1,556
2,600
567
—
355
—
5,078
1,497
21
1,518
347
1,171
(7)
1,164
2.23
(0.01)
2.22
$
$
$
$
$
(1)
(2)
During fiscal 2012, the Company experienced a service interruption which resulted in the loss of service revenue and
the payment of penalties of approximately $54 million related to the unavailability of the Company’s network (the
“2012 Service Interruption”).
Cost of sales included $103 million, research and development included $76 million, and selling, marketing and
administration expenses included $333 million in charges related to the Company’s CORE program and strategic
review process during fiscal 2014. See “Overview – CORE and Operational Restructuring” and “Non-GAAP
Financial Measures”.
14
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Cost of sales included the Z10 Inventory Charge of approximately $934 million, the Q3 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge
of approximately $1.6 billion and the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery incurred in fiscal 2014. See “Overview -
Inventory Charges” and “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
During fiscal 2012, the Company recorded pre-tax charges on its inventory of BlackBerry PlayBooks of
approximately $485 million (the “PlayBook Inventory Charge”) and BlackBerry 7 smartphones of approximately
$267 million (the “2012 BlackBerry 7 Inventory Charge”).
In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company performed an LLA impairment test and based on the results of that
test, the Company recorded the LLA Impairment Charge of approximately $2.7 billion. See “Overview - Long-Lived
Asset Impairment Charge” and “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
During fiscal 2013, the Company performed a goodwill impairment test and based on the results of that test, the
Company recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of approximately $335 million (the “2013 Goodwill
Impairment Charge”).
During fiscal 2012, the Company performed a goodwill impairment test and based on the results of that test, the
Company recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of approximately $355 million (the “2012 Goodwill
Impairment Charge”).
In fiscal 2014, the Company recorded a non-cash charge associated with the change in the fair value of the Debentures
of approximately $377 million, including a $382 million charge in the fourth quarter (the “Q4 Fiscal 2014 Debentures
Fair Value Adjustment”). See “Overview - Debentures Fair Value Adjustment” and “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
During fiscal 2013, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $166 million related to the settlement of uncertain
tax positions, including related interest and foreign exchange gains.
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statement of operations data expressed as a percentage of revenue for the
periods indicated:
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
Change Fiscal
2014/2013
March 3, 2012
Change Fiscal
2013/2012
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross margin
Operating expenses
Research and development
Selling, marketing and
administration
Amortization
Impairment of long-lived assets
Impairment of goodwill
Debentures fair value adjustment
Operating income (loss)
Investment income (loss)
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
Loss from discontinued operations, net
of tax
Net income (loss)
100.0 %
100.6 %
(0.6)%
100.0 %
69.0 %
31.0 %
—
31.6 %
(31.6)%
100.0 %
64.3 %
35.7 %
18.9 %
13.6 %
5.3 %
8.4 %
30.9 %
8.9 %
40.3 %
— %
5.5 %
104.5 %
(105.1)%
(0.3)%
(105.4)%
(19.2)%
19.1 %
6.4 %
— %
3.0 %
— %
42.1 %
(11.1)%
0.1 %
(11.0)%
(5.3)%
11.8 %
2.5 %
40.3 %
(3)%
5.5 %
62.4 %
(94)%
(0.4)%
(94.4)%
(13.9)%
(86.2)%
(5.7)%
(80.5)%
— %
(86.2)%
(0.2)%
(5.9)%
0.2 %
(80.3)%
14.1 %
3.1 %
— %
1.9 %
— %
27.5 %
8.2 %
0.1 %
8.3 %
1.9 %
6.4 %
— %
6.4 %
— %
4.7 %
(4.7)%
5.2 %
5.0 %
3.3 %
— %
1.1 %
— %
14.6 %
(19.3)%
— %
(19.3)%
(7.2)%
(12.1)%
(0.2)%
(12.3)%
15
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Revenue from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 was $6.8 billion, a decrease of approximately $4.3 billion, or 38.5%, from
$11.1 billion in fiscal 2013. Hardware revenue decreased by $2.9 billion, or 43.1%, to $3.8 billion. The Company believes that
the significant decrease in hardware revenue over the prior fiscal year was primarily attributable to decreased demand and
lower sell-through for the Company's new devices, due to the very intense competition. The Company also believes that
uncertainty surrounding its recently completed strategic review process, as well as previously disclosed announcements
concerning the Company's operational restructuring, recent management changes and the Company's workforce reductions,
may have continued to negatively impact demand for the Company's products in fiscal 2014. The number of BlackBerry
handheld devices recognized decreased by approximately 14.4 million, or 51.2%, to approximately 13.7 million in fiscal 2014,
compared to approximately 28.1 million in fiscal 2013. The majority of the devices recognized in fiscal 2014 were BlackBerry
7 devices. During fiscal 2014, approximately 20.5 million (fiscal 2013 - 36.1 million) BlackBerry smartphones were sold
through to end customers, which included shipments made and recognized prior to fiscal 2014 and which reduced the
Company's inventory in channel. Of the devices that sold through to end customers in fiscal 2014, approximately 15.5 million
were BlackBerry 7 devices. Service revenue decreased by $1.2 billion to $2.7 billion in fiscal 2014, which was primarily
attributable to a lower number of BlackBerry users and lower revenue from those users, compared to fiscal 2013. The decrease
also reflects the impact of a $240 million service revenue deferral related to carriers in Venezuela (the “Fiscal 2014 Venezuela
Service Revenue Deferral”) and a $13 million service revenue deferral related to carriers in Argentina (the "Q4 Fiscal 2014
Argentina Service Revenue Deferral") as discussed in “Results of Continuing Operations - Fiscal year ended March 1, 2014
compared to fiscal year ended March 2, 2013 - Revenue - Revenue by Category - Service Revenue”. The Company expects
service revenue to decline in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 by a percentage consistent with the decline experienced in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. Software revenue decreased by $26 million in fiscal 2014 to $235 million, compared to $261
million in fiscal 2013, which was primarily attributable to decreases in technical support and CAL revenues, partially offset by
an increase in QNX revenue. Other revenue decreased by $159 million to $95 million in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013,
which was primarily attributable to non-warranty repair revenue and also reflects gains on revenue hedging instruments
experienced in fiscal 2013 and not repeated in fiscal 2014 as well as decreases in licensing and accessory revenues.
The Company’s net loss from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 was $5.9 billion, or $11.18 per share (basic and diluted),
reflecting an an unfavourable increase in net loss of $5.2 billion compared to net loss from continuing operations of $628
million, or $1.20 per share (basic and diluted), in fiscal 2013. The increase in net loss takes into account the non-cash LLA
Impairment Charge, the primarily non-cash Q3 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge, the non-cash Z10 Inventory Charge, the non-
cash Q4 Fiscal 2014 Debentures Fair Value Adjustment, restructuring charges of approximately $398 million, after tax, related
to the Company’s CORE program and strategic review process, and the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery incurred in fiscal
2014 (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”) as well as the impact of an income tax benefit of $166 million related to the
settlement of uncertain tax positions, including related interest and foreign exchange gains, the non-cash 2013 Goodwill
Impairment Charge and restructuring charges of approximately $151 million, after tax, incurred in fiscal 2013. The
unfavourable increase in net loss is also attributable to a decrease in the Company’s gross margin, partially offset by an increase
in the recovery of income taxes and a reduction in operating expenditures. The decrease in consolidated gross margin was
primarily attributable to decreases in service revenue and the number of devices for which revenue was recognized compared to
fiscal 2013. The decrease in consolidated gross margin also reflects the Company's fixed costs being allocated over lower
shipment volumes. Hardware revenues have lower gross margins than the Company’s consolidated gross margin. Service
revenues earn higher gross margins than sales of handheld devices.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company anticipates maintaining its strong cash position and continuing to look for
opportunities to streamline operations. The Company is targeting break-even cash flow results by the end of fiscal 2015 and
reaching profitability in fiscal 2016.
A more comprehensive analysis of these factors is contained in “Results of Continuing Operations”.
16
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Continuing Operations
Fiscal year ended March 1, 2014 compared to fiscal year ended March 2, 2013
Revenue
Revenue from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 was $6.8 billion, a decrease of approximately $4.3 billion, or 38.5%, from
$11.1 billion in fiscal 2013.
Comparative breakdowns of the significant revenue categories and geographic regions are set forth in the following table:
For the Fiscal Year Ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
Change Fiscal 2014/2013
Millions of BlackBerry handheld
devices recognized
Revenue (in millions)
Hardware
Service
Software
Other
Revenue by Geography (in millions)
North America
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Latin America
Asia Pacific
13.7
3,785
2,698
235
95
6,813
1,811
2,991
907
1,104
6,813
$
$
$
$
Revenue by Category
Hardware Revenue
28.1
6,648
3,910
261
254
11,073
2,896
4,502
2,114
1,561
55.5% $
39.6%
3.5%
1.4%
100.0% $
26.6% $
43.9%
13.3%
16.2%
60.0% $
35.3%
2.4%
2.3%
100.0% $
26.2% $
40.7%
19.1%
14.0%
100.0% $
11,073
100.0% $
(14.4)
(51.2)%
(2,863)
(1,212)
(26)
(159)
(4,260)
(1,085)
(1,511)
(1,207)
(457)
(4,260)
(43.1)%
(31.0)%
(10.0)%
(62.6)%
(38.5)%
(37.5)%
(33.6)%
(57.1)%
(29.3)%
(38.5)%
Hardware revenue was $3.8 billion, or 55.5% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2014 compared to $6.6 billion, or 60.0% of
consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2013, representing a decrease of 43.1%. This decrease in hardware revenue over the prior fiscal
year was primarily attributable to a decrease in the volume of BlackBerry handheld devices recognized by approximately 14.4
million, or 51.2%, to approximately 13.7 million BlackBerry handheld devices in fiscal 2014, compared to approximately 28.1
million BlackBerry handheld devices recognized in fiscal 2013. The majority of the devices recognized in fiscal 2014 were
BlackBerry 7 devices. The Company believes that the significant decrease in hardware revenue over the prior fiscal year was
primarily attributable to decreased demand and lower sell-through for the Company's new devices, due to the very intense
competition. Significant judgment is applied by the Company to determine whether shipments of devices have met the
Company’s revenue recognition criteria, as the analysis is dependent on many facts and circumstances. The Company also
believes that uncertainty surrounding its recently completed strategic review process, as well as previously disclosed
announcements concerning the Company's operational restructuring, recent management changes and the Company's
workforce reductions, may have continued to negatively impact demand for the Company's products in fiscal 2014. In order to
improve sell-through levels and stimulate global demand for BlackBerry devices, the Company continues to implement sell-
through programs with its carrier and distributor partners. As previously disclosed, the Company can no longer reasonably
estimate the amount of the potential sell-through programs that may be offered on certain BlackBerry devices in future periods,
resulting in revenues for BlackBerry 10 devices, and BlackBerry 7 devices in certain regions, being recognized when the
devices sell through to end customers. See “Accounting Policies - Revenue Recognition”.
During fiscal 2014, approximately 20.5 million BlackBerry smartphones were sold through to end customers, which included
shipments made and recognized prior to fiscal 2014 and which reduced the Company's inventory in channel. Of the devices that
sold through to end customers in fiscal 2014, approximately 15.5 million were BlackBerry 7 devices. The number of
BlackBerry smartphones that were sold through to end customers was 36.1 million in fiscal 2013.
17
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Service Revenue
Service revenue decreased by $1.2 billion, or 31.0%, to $2.7 billion, or 39.6% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2014,
compared to $3.9 billion, or 35.3% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2013. Service revenue in fiscal 2014 included
approximately $36 million relating to cash payments received on account of previously deferred service revenue from carriers
in Venezuela. The decrease in service revenue is primarily attributable to a lower number of BlackBerry users and lower
revenue from those users compared to fiscal 2013, and also reflects the Fiscal 2014 Venezuela Service Revenue Deferral and
the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Argentina Service Revenue Deferral, as discussed below.
The year-over-year decrease also resulted from a continued shift in the mix of the Company’s customers from higher-tiered
unlimited plans to prepaid and lower-tiered plans as well as pricing reduction programs implemented by the Company to
maintain the customer base. The number of BlackBerry customers continued to decline in fiscal 2014. As previously disclosed,
as BlackBerry 10 products use the Company's network infrastructure in a different manner than BlackBerry 7 and previous
versions, certain elements of the Company's revenue model have changed. Users of Blackberry 10 devices that require
enhanced services, including advanced security, mobile device management and other services, continue to generate monthly
service revenue. Other BlackBerry 10 users who do not utilize such services, do not generate service revenue. Service revenue
continues to be generated by current and future users of BlackBerry 7 devices and the Company launched a new BlackBerry 7
device, the BlackBerry 9720, in certain markets outside of North America in fiscal 2014. The Company expects service
revenue to decline in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 by a percentage consistent with the decline experienced in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2014.
As the business migrates to BlackBerry 10, the Company plans to enhance the business offering with new value-creating
services including advanced security tools and additional enterprise services, new services for the Company’s strong BBM
base, the creation of cross-platform offerings and services that leverage BlackBerry’s social media community. In February
2014, the Company announced new enterprise solutions, partnerships and smartphone models, including the next generation of
BES (BES 12) that will unify BES 10 and BES 5 onto one platform. BES 12 will enable organizations to develop enterprise-
grade applications that are quickly deployed to BlackBerry smartphones and other mobile devices and provide customers with
the ability to move securely from on-premise to the cloud effortlessly. The Company also announced a new BES pricing and
licensing structure (Silver and Gold) and a new EZ pass program that will enable customers to move from BES and other
mobile device management programs to BES 10 or BES 12 at the Silver level of service for free, the eBBM Suite (a new
family of products and services, including BBM Protected, that will work with BlackBerry smartphones, BES and BES 10 to
provide enterprise-class mobile messaging), the BlackBerry Z3 and the BlackBerry Classic (originally announced as the
BlackBerry Q20). No material revenue has yet been recognized from BES 10 but the Company continues to expect gradual
revenue contributions from BES 10 and BES 12 beginning in fiscal 2015.
The Fiscal 2014 Venezuela Service Revenue Deferral refers to the fact that, based on the recent political and economic events
that have occurred in Venezuela, combined with that country's existing and recently amended foreign currency restrictions, the
Company recognized revenues on a cash basis in fiscal 2014. The Company does not sell smartphones directly into the
Venezuelan market, nor does it have any operations in Venezuela. Moreover, the Company only invoices its carrier partners in
Venezuela in U.S. dollars for service access fees provided to the BlackBerry subscriber base. The invoices are reviewed by the
carriers and subsequently, an application is made by them to the government-operated Foreign Exchange Administration Board
(“CADIVI”) in Venezuela to obtain the necessary U.S. dollars to settle their obligations to the Company. Foreign currency
restrictions and other foreign exchange mechanisms implemented by the Venezuelan government have impacted the ability of
the Company’s Venezuelan carrier partners to timely obtain U.S. dollars in exchange for Venezuelan Bolivars, and the
Company is continuing to monitor development in this area as it considers strategies to secure payment of its outstanding
invoices. The application and approval process continue to be delayed and the Company’s ability to timely obtain U.S. dollars
at the official exchange rate remains uncertain. During fiscal 2014, the Company deferred service revenues associated with
services rendered in fiscal 2014 of approximately $240 million. The Company also experienced similar currency-related issues
in Argentina in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, which led to the deterioration of collections from the carriers to whom the
Company provides services. As a result, the Company recorded the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Argentina Service Revenue Deferral of
approximately $13 million of service revenue associated with service access fees charged to customers in Argentina in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
Software Revenue
Software revenue, which includes fees from licensed BES software, CALs, technical support, maintenance, upgrades and QNX
software licensing revenues decreased by $26 million, or 10.0%, to $235 million, or 3.5% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal
2014, compared to $261 million, or 2.4% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2013. The decrease was primarily attributable to
decreases in technical support and CAL revenues, partially offset by an increase in QNX revenue.
18
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Other Revenue
Other revenue, which includes non-warranty repairs, accessories, licensing revenues and gains and losses on revenue hedging
instruments, decreased by $159 million, or 62.6% to $95 million, or 1.4% in fiscal 2014 compared to $254 million, or 2.3% in
fiscal 2013. The decrease was primarily attributable to non-warranty repair revenue and also reflects gains on revenue hedging
instruments experienced in fiscal 2013 and not repeated in fiscal 2014 as well as decreases in licensing and accessory revenues.
See “Market Risk of Financial Instruments - Foreign Exchange” for additional information on the Company’s hedging
instruments.
Revenue Trends
The Company has continued to encounter challenges adapting to the BYOD movement as many IT departments that previously
required employees to use the BlackBerry wireless solution because of its emphasis on security and reliability are permitting
employees to choose devices offered by the Company’s competitors, who are increasingly promoting the merits of their own
security and reliability, and this has impacted the Company’s enterprise subscriber account base. To address this evolution of
the market, the Company has introduced products, including its portfolio of BlackBerry 10 smartphones with BlackBerry
Balance and BES 10, which give IT departments the ability to securely manage BlackBerry devices and other operating system
platforms through a single unified interface and to securely protect corporate data on an employee’s personal smartphone or
tablet. The Company has continued to encounter challenges with the BYOD trend. As previously disclosed, the Company also
believes that uncertainty surrounding its recently completed strategic review process may have continued to negatively impact
demand for the Company's products in fiscal 2014. The Company plans to refocus its product and services offerings on its end-
to-end solution of hardware, software and services for enterprises. The Company has experienced a decline in demand for its
products and in its overall market share. The intense competition impacting the Company's financial and operational results that
previously affected demand in the United States market is now being experienced globally, including in international markets
where the Company has historically experienced rapid growth. The increase in competition encountered by the Company in
international markets is due to the recent entry into those markets of global competitors offering high end devices that compete
with the Company's BlackBerry 10 devices, as well as other competitors targeting those markets with lower end Android-based
devices that compete with the Company's lower cost devices. The decline can also be attributed to consumer preferences for
devices with access to the broadest number of applications, such as those available in the iOS and Android environments.
As previously disclosed, the Company has experienced a continued decline in service revenues. See “Summary Results of
Continuing Operations – Three months ended March 1, 2014 compared to Three months ended March 2, 2013 – Revenue –
Revenue by Category – Service Revenue” and “Overview – Sources of Revenue” for further details related to the Company’s
assessment of the decline of its service revenues.
Revenue by Geography
North America Revenues
Revenues in North America were $1.8 billion or 26.6% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2014, reflecting a decrease of $1.1
billion compared to $2.9 billion, or 26.2% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013. The decrease in North American revenue is
primarily attributable to a decrease in revenue from the United States, which represented approximately 19.4% of total
consolidated revenue in fiscal 2014, compared to 20.2% of total consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013, as a result of the intensely
competitive dynamics within the United States. Sales in Canada represented approximately 7.2% of the consolidated revenue.
Revenues in the United States have continued to decline and subscriber attrition has remained high due to the intense
competition faced by the Company in this market, consumer preferences for devices with access to the broadest number of
applications, such as those available in the iOS and Android environments, and the other factors described above. To address
this decline, the Company worked with developers to ensure that a broad spectrum of applications including games,
multimedia, productivity, enterprise and social media applications would be available on BlackBerry 10 smartphones prior to
their introduction. Sales in the United States have also been impacted by the significant number of new Android-based
competitors that have entered the market.
Europe, Middle East and Africa Revenues
Revenues in Europe, Middle East and Africa were $3.0 billion or 43.9% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2014, reflecting a
decrease of $1.5 billion compared to $4.5 billion or 40.7% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013. Some of the larger markets
comprising this region include the United Kingdom, South Africa and United Arab Emirates. The Company launched
BlackBerry 10 devices in many countries in this region in fiscal 2014 including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, South
Africa, the United Kingdom, Slovakia, Austria, Netherlands, Nigeria, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Switzerland,
Kuwait, Lebanon, Iraq and Pakistan.
19
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Latin America Revenues
Revenues in Latin America were $907 million or 13.3% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2014, reflecting a decrease of $1.2
billion compared to $2.1 billion or 19.1% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013. Some of the larger markets comprising this
region include Argentina, Colombia and Venezuela. The Company launched BlackBerry 10 devices in many countries in this
region in fiscal 2014 including Mexico, Colombia, Chile, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru.
Asia Pacific Revenues
Revenues in Asia Pacific were $1.1 billion or 16.2% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2014, reflecting a decrease of $457
million compared to $1.6 billion or 14.0% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013. Some of the larger markets comprising this
region include Indonesia and India. In fiscal 2014, the Company launched BlackBerry 10 devices in many countries in this
region including Australia, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Malaysia, India, Indonesia and Singapore.
Gross Margin
Consolidated gross margin from continuing operations decreased by $3.5 billion, to a loss of $43 million, or (0.6)% of
consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2014, compared to $3.4 billion, or 31.0% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2013. Excluding the
impacts of the Q3 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge, the Z10 Inventory Charge, the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery, charges
related to the CORE program incurred in fiscal 2014, of which $103 million was attributable to cost of sales (see “Non-GAAP
Financial Measures”), and the impact of charges related to the CORE program incurred in fiscal 2013, of which $96 million
was attributable to cost of sales, gross margin decreased by $1.1 billion.
The $1.1 billion decrease in consolidated gross margin was primarily attributable to decreases in service revenue and the
number of devices for which revenue was recognized compared to fiscal 2013. The majority of the devices recognized in fiscal
2014 were BlackBerry 7 devices, which, until recently, have historically had lower gross margins than Blackberry 10 devices.
The decrease in consolidated gross margin also reflects the Company's fixed costs being allocated over lower shipment
volumes. Hardware revenues have lower gross margins than the Company’s consolidated gross margin. Service revenues earn
higher gross margins than sales of handheld devices.
Operating Expenses
The table below presents a comparison of research and development, selling, marketing and administration, and amortization
expense from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013.
March 1, 2014
% of
Revenue
For the Fiscal Year Ended
(in millions)
March 2, 2013
% of
Revenue
Change Fiscal 2014/2013
% of
Change
Revenue
$
6,813
$
11,073
$
(4,260)
(38.5)%
Operating expenses
Research and development(1)
Selling, marketing and administration(1)
Amortization
Impairment of Long Lived Assets(2)
Impairment of Goodwill(3)
Debentures fair value adjustment(4)
Total
1,286
2,103
606
2,748
—
377
18.9%
30.9%
8.9%
40.3%
—%
5.5%
1,509
2,111
714
—
335
—
13.6% $
19.1%
6.4%
—%
3.0%
—%
$
7,120
104.5% $
4,669
42.1% $
(223)
(8)
(108)
2,748
(335)
377
2,451
(14.8)%
(0.4)%
(15.1)%
100.0 %
(100.0)%
100.0 %
52.5 %
(1)
(2)
(3)
Research and development and selling, marketing and administration expenses for fiscal 2014 included charges of
approximately $76 million and $333 million, respectively, related to the CORE Program.
During fiscal 2014, the Company performed an LLA impairment test and based on the results of that test, the
Company recorded the LLA Impairment Charge of approximately $2.7 billion. See “Overview - Long-Lived Asset
Impairment Charge”.
During fiscal 2013, the Company recorded the pre-tax 2013 Goodwill Impairment Charge of approximately $335
million.
20
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(4)
In fiscal 2014, the Company recorded a non-cash net charge associated with the change in the fair value of the
Debentures of $377 million, including the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Debentures Fair Value Adjustment of approximately $382
million. See “Overview - Debentures Fair Value Adjustment”.
Operating expenses increased by $2.5 billion, or 52.5%, to $7.1 billion or 104.5% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2014,
compared to $4.7 billion or 42.1% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013. Excluding the impact of the LLA Impairment Charge
of approximately $2.7 billion, the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Debentures Fair Value Adjustment of approximately $382 million and
charges incurred as part of the the Company’s CORE program and strategic review process during fiscal 2014, of which $409
million were attributable to operating expenditures (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”), as well as the impact of the 2013
Goodwill Impairment Charge of approximately $335 million and charges incurred as part of the CORE program during fiscal
2013, of which $124 million were attributable to operating expenditures, operating expenses decreased by $629 million. This
decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in salaries and benefits costs due to a reduction in headcount related to the
CORE program, legal expenses and marketing and advertising costs. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in
consulting costs related to the Company's recently completed strategic review process.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for technical personnel, new product
development costs, travel, office and building infrastructure costs and other employee costs.
Research and development expenses decreased by $223 million, or 14.8%, to $1.3 billion in fiscal 2014, compared to $1.5
billion in fiscal 2013. Excluding the impact of charges incurred as part of the CORE program during fiscal 2014, of which $76
million was attributable to research and development expenditures, and the impact of the charges incurred as part of the CORE
program during fiscal 2013, of which $27 million was attributable to research and development expenditures, research and
development expenses decreased by $272 million. The decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in salaries and benefits
costs due to a reduction in headcount and other costs savings related to the CORE program, a decrease in research and
development device costs as a result of the cancellation of two planned devices. Research and development-related headcount
decreased by approximately 30% compared to the end of fiscal 2013.
Selling, Marketing and Administration Expenses
Selling, marketing and administration expenses consist primarily of marketing, advertising and promotion, salaries and
benefits, external advisory fees, information technology costs, office and related staffing infrastructure costs and travel
expenses.
Selling, marketing and administration expenses decreased by $8 million, or 0.4%, to $2.1 billion in fiscal 2014 compared to
$2.1 billion in fiscal 2013. Excluding the impact of charges incurred as part of the CORE program during fiscal 2014, of which
$333 million was attributable to selling, marketing and administration expenditures, and the impact of the charges incurred as
part of the Company’s CORE program and strategic review process during fiscal 2013, of which $97 million was attributable to
selling, marketing and administration expenditures, selling, marketing and administration expenses decreased by $244 million.
The decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in salaries and benefits costs due to a reduction in headcount related to the
CORE program, legal expenses and marketing and advertising expenses, partially offset by an increase in consulting costs
related to the Company's recently completed strategic review process. Selling, marketing and administration related headcount
decreased by approximately 36%, compared to the end of fiscal 2013.
21
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Amortization Expense
The table below presents a comparison of amortization expense relating to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
recorded as amortization or cost of sales from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013. Intangible assets
are comprised of patents, licenses and acquired technology.
For the Fiscal Year Ended
(in millions)
Included in Amortization
March 2,
2013
March 1,
2014
Change
Included in Cost of sales
March 2,
2013
March 1,
2014
Change
$
$
321
285
606
$
$
402
312
714
$
$
(81) $
(27)
(108) $
211
453
664
$
$
319
874
1,193
$
$
(108)
(421)
(529)
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Total
Amortization
Amortization expense relating to certain property, plant and equipment and intangible assets decreased by $108 million to $606
million for fiscal 2014, compared to $714 million for fiscal 2013. The decrease in amortization expense reflects the lower cost
base of LLA as a result of the LLA Impairment Charge recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2014, as well as reduced spending
on capital assets, partially offset by certain property, plant and equipment and intangible asset additions made over the last four
quarters.
Cost of sales
Amortization expense relating to certain property, plant and equipment and intangible assets employed in the Company’s
manufacturing operations and BlackBerry service operations decreased by $529 million to $664 million for fiscal 2014,
compared to $1.2 billion for fiscal 2013. This decrease primarily reflects the impact of amortizing intangible assets over lower
shipment volumes and the lower cost base of LLA as a result of the LLA Impairment Charge recorded in fiscal 2014. The
decrease was partially offset by renewed or amended licensing agreements and certain property, plant and equipment asset
additions made over the last four quarters.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
During fiscal 2014, the Company performed an LLA impairment test and based on the results of that test, the Company
recorded the LLA Impairment Charge of approximately $2.7 billion. See “Overview - Long-Lived Asset Impairment Charge”
and “Critical Accounting Estimates - Valuation of LLA”.
Impairment of Goodwill
Due to business conditions and a continued significant decline in the Company’s market capitalization, the Company concluded
that goodwill impairment indicators existed and an interim goodwill impairment assessment was required for the first quarter of
fiscal 2013. The Company used a two-step impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measured the amount
of the goodwill impairment loss to be recognized. As a result of the test performed, the Company recorded the 2013 Goodwill
Impairment Charge of $335 million, which eliminated the remaining carrying value of its goodwill, and reported this amount as
a separate line item in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company’s share price and control premium are
significant factors in assessing the Company’s fair value for purposes of the goodwill impairment assessment. The Company’s
share price can be affected by, among other things, changes in industry or market conditions, including the effect of
competition, changes in the Company’s results of operations, and changes in the Company’s forecasts or market expectations
relating to future results. See “Risk Factors – The market price of the Company’s common shares is volatile” in the Company’s
Annual Information Form and "Critical Accounting Estimates and Accounting Policies – Accounting Policies – Goodwill" in
this MD&A.
Investment Income
Investment income decreased by $36 million to a loss of $21 million in fiscal 2014, from a gain of $15 million in fiscal 2013.
The decrease primarily reflects interest costs associated with the Debentures, certain one-time gains recorded in fiscal 2013 not
repeated in fiscal 2014, recognition of the Company's portion of investment losses in its equity-based investments and the
decreases in the Company's average cash and investment balances and yield. The decrease was partially offset by the accrual
of interest income for other tax matters. See “Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources”.
22
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Income Taxes
For fiscal 2014, the Company’s income tax recovery from continuing operations was $1.3 billion, resulting in an effective
income tax recovery rate of approximately 18.2%, compared to income tax recovery of $592 million and an effective income
tax rate of approximately 48.5% for the prior fiscal year. The Company's effective income tax recovery rate reflects the
geographic mix of earnings in jurisdictions with different tax rates. The Company's lower effective income tax recovery rate in
fiscal 2014 primarily reflects certain charges related to the LLA Impairment Charge resulting in the recognition of a deferred
tax valuation allowance, which is more fully described below.
The Company regularly assesses the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. In making that assessment,
the Company considers both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets to
determine, based on the weight of available evidence, whether it is more-likely-than-not that some or all of the deferred tax
assets will be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, the Company noted that there were significant
increases in deductible temporary differences in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 in relation to the LLA Impairment Charge,
which was not currently deductible for tax purposes. In addition, the Company has three years of cumulative losses for fiscal
2014. As a result, the Company was unable to recognize the benefit relating to a significant portion of deferred tax assets that
arose in fiscal 2014, which resulted in a $783 million valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The deferred tax
recovery is partially offset by this deferred tax valuation allowance of $781 million and included in the income tax provision in
fiscal 2014. This accounting treatment has no effect on the Company’s actual ability to utilize deferred tax assets to reduce
future cash tax payments. The Company will continue to assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be realizable at
each reporting period and the valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company took steps to accelerate the receipt of a portion of the tax refund to which
it is entitled. The Canadian federal and Ontario provincial Ministers of Finance had indicated to the Company that they would
be prepared to recommend measures such that the acceleration would not jeopardize the Company's potential entitlement to the
balance of its tax refund. The Company's actions resulted in a November 3, 2013 taxation year end, which triggered the
entitlement to the accrued tax refund of $696 million, which the Company received in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. In
December 2013, Remission Orders were made by the Canadian federal and Ontario provincial governments which preserved
the Company's ability to carry back losses for the balance of fiscal 2014 and for fiscal 2015 on the same basis as without the
November 3, 2013 taxation year end. The tax provision includes the impact of the Remission Orders in accordance with ASC
740 because they were made in the fourth quarter.
Given the change in the Company's financial circumstances in the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company has provided for
foreign withholding taxes of $32 million that would apply on the distribution of the earnings of its non-Canadian subsidiaries as
these earnings are no longer intended to be reinvested indefinitely by these subsidiaries.
Net Loss
The Company’s net loss from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 was $5.9 billion or $11.18 per share (basic and diluted),
reflecting increase in net loss of $5.2 billion compared to net loss from continuing operations of $628 million, or $1.20 per
share (basic and diluted) in fiscal 2013. The increase in net loss from continuing operations includes the impacts in fiscal 2014
and 2013 of:
the LLA Impairment Charge;
the Q3 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge;
the Z10 Inventory Charge;
the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Debentures Fair Value Adjustment;
restructuring charges of approximately $398 million, after tax, related to the Company’s CORE program and strategic
review process; and
the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery.
an income tax benefit of $166 million related to the settlement of uncertain tax positions, including related interest and
foreign exchange gains;
the 2013 Goodwill Impairment Charge; and
approximately $151 million, after-tax, of restructuring charges related to the Company's CORE program in fiscal
2013.
Excluding the above items (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”), the Company's net loss increased by $394 million
compared to fiscal 2013, which reflects a decrease in the Company’s gross margin, partially offset by an increase in the
recovery of income taxes and a reduction in operating expenditures. The decrease in the Company's consolidated gross margin
23
Fiscal 2014
•
•
•
•
•
Fiscal 2013
•
•
•
•
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
is primarily due to decreases in service revenue and the number of devices for which revenue was recognized compared to
fiscal 2013 and also reflects the Company's fixed costs being allocated over lower shipment volumes. Hardware revenues have
lower gross margins than the Company’s consolidated gross margin. Service revenues earn higher gross margins than sales of
handheld devices.
The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 525 million common shares for basic and diluted loss per share for the
fiscal year ended March 1, 2014 and 524 million common shares for both basic and diluted loss per share for the fiscal year
ended March 2, 2013.
Common Shares Outstanding
On March 24, 2014, there were 527 million voting common shares, options to purchase 3 million voting common shares, 24
million restricted share units and 0.2 million deferred share units outstanding.
The Company has not paid any cash dividends during the last three fiscal years.
Fiscal year ended March 2, 2013 compared to fiscal year ended March 3, 2012
Revenue
Revenue from continuing operations for fiscal 2013 was $11.1 billion, a decrease of approximately $7.4 billion, or 39.9%, from
$18.4 billion in fiscal 2012.
Comparative breakdowns of the significant revenue categories and geographic regions are set forth in the following table:
For the Fiscal Year Ended
March 2, 2013
March 3, 2012
Millions of BlackBerry handheld
devices shipped(1)
Millions of BlackBerry PlayBook
tablets shipped
Revenue (in millions)
Hardware
Service (2)
Software
Other
28.1
1.1
6,648
3,910
261
254
$
49.0
1.3
60.0% $
13,794
74.9% $
35.3%
2.4%
2.3%
4,074
318
237
22.1%
1.7%
1.3%
$
11,073
100.0% $
18,423
100.0% $
Revenue by Geography (in millions)
North America
$
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Latin America
Asia Pacific
2,896
4,502
2,114
1,561
26.2% $
40.7%
19.1%
14.0%
5,442
7,662
2,646
2,673
29.5% $
41.6%
14.4%
14.5%
$
11,073
100.0% $
18,423
100.0% $
Change Fiscal
2013/2012
(20.9)
(42.7)%
(0.2)
(15.4)%
(7,146)
(164)
(57)
17
(7,350)
(2,546)
(3,160)
(532)
(1,112)
(7,350)
(51.8)%
(4.0)%
(17.9)%
7.2 %
(39.9)%
(46.8)%
(41.2)%
(20.1)%
(41.6)%
(39.9)%
(1)
(2)
In fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, the Company recognized revenue on handheld devices when shipped. See "Accounting
Policies - Revenue Recognition."
During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company experienced the 2012 Service Interruption, which resulted in the
loss of service revenue and the payment of penalties of approximately $54 million related to the unavailability of the
Company’s network.
Hardware revenue was $6.6 billion, or 60.0% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2013 compared to $13.8 billion, or 74.9% of
consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2012, representing a decrease of 51.8%. This decrease in hardware revenue over the prior fiscal
year was primarily attributable to a decrease in the volume of BlackBerry handheld devices shipped by approximately 20.9
million, or 42.7%, to approximately 28.1 million BlackBerry handheld devices in fiscal 2013, compared to approximately 49.0
24
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
million BlackBerry handheld devices shipped in fiscal 2012. The decline in the volume of BlackBerry devices shipped was
primarily a result of decreased demand for the Company’s aging product portfolio in a very competitive environment in which
multiple competitors introduced new devices beginning in early fiscal 2013. The Company introduced the first BlackBerry 10
smartphones in certain countries starting on January 31, 2013. The overall decrease in revenue in fiscal 2013 was also
attributable to a decrease in average selling prices of BlackBerry 7 handheld devices in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012 due
to the continuation of pricing initiatives to drive sell-through, partially offset by the higher average selling prices of BlackBerry
10 devices. However, the impact of BlackBerry 10 smartphone sales on total revenue for fiscal 2013 was modest since they
were only available in certain markets for one month or less prior to the end of fiscal 2013. Delays in the introduction of the
BlackBerry 10 smartphones resulted in certain of the current BlackBerry 7 product line being in the market for over one year,
which contributed to declining unit shipments and a loss of market share in fiscal 2013 as some customers either awaited the
launch of the new BlackBerry 10 smartphones or switched to devices of the Company's competitors.
The number of BlackBerry PlayBook tablets shipped during fiscal 2013 was approximately 1.1 million, representing a decrease
of 0.2 million units compared to the prior fiscal year. Overall, BlackBerry PlayBook tablet shipments experienced lower than
anticipated sell-through to end users due mainly to intense competition in the tablet market, especially in the United States.
During fiscal 2013, the Company continued its ongoing promotional activities to encourage sell-through of the BlackBerry
PlayBook tablets.
Service revenue decreased by $164 million, or 4.0%, to $3.9 billion, or 35.3% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2013,
compared to $4.1 billion, or 22.1% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2012. The decrease in service revenue was primarily due
to the net decrease in BlackBerry subscribers. The decrease in service revenue also reflected a decrease in average revenue per
user (“ARPU”). The decrease in ARPU resulted from pricing reduction programs implemented by the Company to maintain the
subscriber base as well as a shift in the mix of the Company’s subscriber base from higher tiered unlimited plans to prepaid and
lower tiered plans. BlackBerry tiered service plans continued to drive growth in the Company’s subscriber base in fiscal 2013,
specifically outside North America.
Software revenue, which includes fees from licensed BES software, CALs, technical support, maintenance and upgrades
decreased by $57 million, or 17.9%, to $261 million, or 2.4% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2013, compared to $318
million, or 1.7% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2012. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in CALs and
maintenance revenue.
Other revenue, which includes non-warranty repairs, accessories, licensing revenues and gains and losses on revenue hedging
instruments, increased by $17 million to $254 million in fiscal 2013 compared to $237 million in fiscal 2012. The majority of
the increase was attributable to increases in gains on revenue hedging instruments and IP licensing, partially offset by decreases
in non-warranty repair revenues and accessories revenue. See “Market Risk of Financial Instruments - Foreign Exchange” for
additional information on the Company’s hedging instruments.
Revenues in North America were $2.9 billion or 26.2% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013, reflecting a decrease of $2.5
billion compared to $5.4 billion, or 29.5% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to a
decrease in revenue from the United States, which represented approximately 20% of total consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013,
compared to 23% of total consolidated revenue in fiscal 2012, as a result of shifts in the competitive dynamics within the
United States, an aging in-market product portfolio, as well as growth in international markets compared to fiscal 2012. While
the Company’s BlackBerry 7 upgrade program had been well received by many of its customers, revenues in the United States
continued to decline and subscriber attrition remained high due to the intense competition faced by the Company in this market,
the lack of an LTE smartphone product and a high-end consumer offering prior to the launch of the BlackBerry Z10
smartphone on March 22, 2013, as well as consumer preferences for devices with access to the broadest number of
applications, such as those available in the iOS and Android environments. To address this, the Company worked with
developers to ensure that a broad spectrum of applications including games, multimedia, productivity, enterprise and social
media applications would be available on BlackBerry 10 smartphones prior to their introduction, which began in certain
countries in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 and in the United States on March 22, 2013. Sales in the United States were also
impacted by the significant number of new Android-based competitors that entered the market. In addition, the increased desire
by carriers to sell devices that operate on the new, faster LTE networks being built also impacted the Company’s market share
in the United States, as these networks featured faster download speeds and enabled carriers to offer higher-value data plans.
The Company’s first LTE smartphones were the BlackBerry 10 smartphones, which were made available in the United States
following the end of fiscal 2013.
Revenues in Europe, Middle East and Africa were $4.5 billion or 40.7% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013, reflecting a
decrease of $3.2 billion compared to $7.7 billion or 41.6% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2012. The Company’s largest
market in this region, the United Kingdom, represented approximately 11% of total consolidated revenue, an increase of 1%
from fiscal 2012. The United Kingdom was also the first country to introduce the Company’s BlackBerry 10 smartphones into
25
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
market on January 31, 2013. Some of the larger markets comprising this region included South Africa, France and United Arab
Emirates. Subscriber accounts in Europe, Middle East and Africa remained stable, marginally increasing by 1% since the end of
fiscal 2012. In addition to the United Kingdom, the Company launched the BlackBerry Z10 in many countries in this region in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 including South Africa, Nigeria, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Switzerland, Kuwait,
United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, Iraq and Pakistan.
Revenues in Latin America were $2.1 billion or 19.1% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013, reflecting a decrease of $532
million compared to $2.6 billion or 14.4% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2012. Some of the larger markets comprising this
region included Venezuela and Mexico. Subscriber accounts in Latin America increased by 17% since fiscal 2012. The
Company launched its first BlackBerry 10 devices in the region in Mexico on March 23, 2013.
Revenues in Asia Pacific were $1.6 billion or 14.0% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013, reflecting a decrease of $1.1 billion
compared to $2.7 billion or 14.5% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2012. Some of the larger markets comprising this region
included Indonesia and India. Subscriber accounts in Asia Pacific increased by 36% since the end of fiscal 2012. In the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company launched the BlackBerry Z10 in many countries in this region including Indonesia, India,
Malaysia and Singapore.
Gross Margin
Consolidated gross margin from continuing operations decreased by $3.1 billion, to $3.4 billion, or 31.0% of consolidated
revenue, in fiscal 2013, compared to $6.6 billion, or 35.7% of consolidated revenue, in fiscal 2012. Excluding the impact of
charges related to the CORE program incurred in fiscal 2013, of which $96 million was attributable to cost of sales, and the
impacts of the PlayBook Inventory Charge, the 2012 BlackBerry 7 Inventory Charge, the 2012 Service Interruption and charges
related to the Company’s previous cost optimization program, of which $14 million were attributable to cost of sales, that were
incurred in fiscal 2012, gross margin decreased by $3.9 billion.
The $3.9 billion decrease in consolidated gross margin was primarily attributable to the lower volume of BlackBerry handheld
devices shipped as a result of the Company’s aging product portfolio in a very competitive environment in which multiple
competitors introduced new devices beginning in early fiscal 2013 and lower average selling prices of BlackBerry 7 devices
due to the continuation of pricing initiatives to drive sell-through. The decrease in gross margin was partially offset by the
higher average selling prices of BlackBerry 10 devices shipped, favorable renegotiations of key contracts associated with
elements of the Company’s hardware business and benefits from a leaner and re-architected supply chain.
Operating Expenses
The table below presents a comparison of research and development, selling, marketing and administration, amortization and
litigation expenses for fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012.
Revenue
Operating expenses
Research and development (1)
Selling, marketing and administration (1)
Amortization
$
$
Impairment of Goodwill
Total
March 2, 2013
% of
Revenue
For the Fiscal Year Ended
(in millions)
March 3, 2012
% of
Revenue
Change Fiscal 2013/2012
% of
Change
11,073
$
18,423
$
(7,350)
(39.9)%
1,509
2,111
714
335
13.6% $
19.1%
6.4%
3.0%
1,556
2,600
567
355
8.4% $
14.1%
3.1%
1.9%
$
4,669
42.1% $
5,078
27.5% $
(47)
(489)
147
(20)
(409)
(3.0)%
(18.8)%
25.9 %
(5.6)%
(8.1)%
(1)
Research and development and selling, marketing and administration expenses for fiscal 2013 included charges of
approximately $27 million and $97 million, respectively, related to the Company's previous cost optimization
program.
Operating expenses decreased by $409 million, or 8.1%, to $4.7 billion or 42.1% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2013,
compared to $5.1 billion or 27.5% of consolidated revenue in fiscal 2012, reflecting the lower consolidated revenue in fiscal
2013. Excluding the impact of the 2013 Goodwill Impairment Charge and charges incurred as part of the CORE program
during fiscal 2013, of which $124 million were attributable to operating expenditures, and the 2012 Goodwill Impairment
26
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Charge and charges incurred as part of the Company’s previous cost optimization program during fiscal 2012, of which $111
million were attributed to operating expenditures, operating expenses decreased by $402 million. This decrease was primarily
attributable to decreased marketing costs, an increase in foreign exchange gains and cost savings related to vendor contracts
and a net reduction in headcount related costs driven by the CORE program compared to fiscal 2012.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for technical personnel, new product
development costs, travel, office and building infrastructure costs and other employee costs.
Research and development expenses decreased by $47 million, or 3.0%, to $1.5 billion in fiscal 2013, compared to $1.6 billion
in fiscal 2012. Excluding the impact of charges incurred as part of the CORE program during fiscal 2013, of which $27 million
were attributable to research and development expenditures, and the charges incurred as part of the Company’s previous cost
optimization program during fiscal 2012, of which $23 million were attributed to research and development expenditures,
research and development expenses decreased by $51 million. This decrease was primarily attributable to a reduction in
materials costs due to fewer new product introductions as well as a net reduction in headcount related costs driven by the
CORE program compared to fiscal 2012. Research and development related headcount decreased by approximately 9%,
compared to fiscal 2012.
Selling, Marketing and Administration Expenses
Selling, marketing and administration expenses consist primarily of marketing, advertising and promotion, salaries and
benefits, external advisory fees, information technology costs, office and related staffing infrastructure costs and travel
expenses.
Selling, marketing and administration expenses decreased by $489 million, or 18.8%, to $2.1 billion in fiscal 2013 compared to
$2.6 billion in fiscal 2012. Excluding the impact of charges incurred as part of the CORE program during fiscal 2013, of which
$97 million was attributable to selling, marketing and administration expenditures, and the charges incurred as part of the
Company’s previous cost optimization program during fiscal 2012, of which $88 million was attributable to selling marketing
and administration expenditures, selling, marketing and administration expenses decreased by $498 million. This decrease was
primarily attributable to decreased marketing costs, an increase in foreign exchange gains and cost savings related to vendor
contracts and a net reduction in headcount related costs driven by the CORE program compared to fiscal 2012. Headcount
related to selling, marketing and administration functions decreased by approximately 33%, as compared to fiscal 2012.
Amortization Expense
The table below presents a comparison of amortization expense relating to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
recorded as amortization or cost of sales from continuing operations for fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012. Intangible assets
are comprised of patents, licenses and acquired technology.
For the Fiscal Year Ended
(in millions)
Included in Amortization
Included in Cost of sales
March 2,
2013
March 3,
2012
Change
March 2,
2013
March 3,
2012
Change
$
$
402
312
714
$
$
359
208
567
$
$
43
104
147
$
$
319
874
1,193
$
$
301
651
952
$
$
18
223
241
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Total
Amortization
Amortization expense relating to certain property, plant and equipment and intangible assets increased by $147 million to $714
million for fiscal 2013, compared to $567 million for fiscal 2012, which primarily reflected the impact of certain property, plant
and equipment and intangible asset additions made over the prior four quarters.
Cost of sales
Amortization expense relating to certain property, plant and equipment and intangible assets employed in the Company’s
manufacturing operations and BlackBerry service operations increased by $241 million to $1.2 billion for fiscal 2013,
27
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
compared to $952 million for fiscal 2012. This increase primarily reflected the impact of renewed or amended licensing
agreements and certain property, plant and equipment asset additions made over the prior four quarters.
Impairment of Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of an acquisition price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested
for impairment annually, through a two step process, in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more frequently if events or
changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill is more likely than not impaired.
The Company performed a goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and concluded that
impairment existed. Based on the results of that test, the Company recorded the 2012 Goodwill Impairment Charge of $355
million.
Due to business conditions and a continued significant decline in the Company’s market capitalization, the Company concluded
that goodwill impairment indicators existed and an interim goodwill impairment assessment was required for the first quarter of
fiscal 2013. The Company used a two-step impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measured the amount
of the goodwill impairment loss to be recognized. In the first step, the fair value of the Company was determined using the
Company’s average market capitalization for the preceding five days from the impairment test date, plus a reasonable control
premium, which was established based on recent market transactions. The results from the first step of the goodwill impairment
test demonstrated that the carrying value of the Company exceeded its estimated fair value as at the balance sheet date and
therefore the second step of the goodwill impairment test was performed.
In the second step of the impairment test, the Company calculated the impairment loss by estimating the implied fair value of
goodwill and comparing it with its carrying value. Using the fair value determined in the first step as the acquisition price, the
implied fair value of goodwill was calculated as the residual amount of the acquisition price after allocations made to the fair
value of net assets, including recognized and unrecognized intangible assets. Based on the results of the second step of the
goodwill impairment test, it was concluded that the carrying value of goodwill was impaired. Consequently, the Company
recorded the 2013 Goodwill Impairment Charge of $335 million, which eliminated the remaining carrying value of its
goodwill, and reported this amount as a separate line item in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company’s share price and control premium are significant factors in assessing the Company’s fair value for purposes of
the goodwill impairment assessment. The Company’s share price can be affected by, among other things, changes in industry or
market conditions, including the effect of competition, changes in the Company’s results of operations, and changes in the
Company’s forecasts or market expectations relating to future results. See “Risk Factors – The market price of the Company’s
common shares is volatile” in the Company’s Annual Information Form.
Investment Income
Investment income decreased by $6 million to $15 million in fiscal 2013, from $21 million in fiscal 2012. The decrease in
investment income was the result of decreases in the company’s average yield on its investments, the recording of the
Company’s portion of investment losses in its equity-based investments, and the accrual of interest expenses for other tax
matters, offset by a gain on the sale of the Company’s claim on Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (“LBIE”) trust assets
which had previously been impaired in fiscal 2011.
Income Taxes
For fiscal 2013, the Company’s income tax recovery from continuing operations was $592 million, resulting in an effective
income tax recovery rate of approximately 48.5%, compared to income tax expense of $347 million and an effective income
tax rate of approximately 22.9% for the prior fiscal year. The Company’s effective income tax recovery rate reflected the
geographic mix of earnings in jurisdictions with different income tax rates. The higher effective income tax recovery rate in
fiscal 2013 primarily reflected the favourable impacts of the $152 million effective settlement of uncertain income tax positions
in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 that resulted from prior restructuring of the Company’s international operations, carrying
operating losses back to prior periods with higher effective income tax rates and the effect of income tax incentives on earnings
offset by the unfavourable impact of the 2013 Goodwill Impairment Charge.
Net Income (Loss)
The Company’s net loss from continuing operations for fiscal 2013 was $628 million, a decrease of $1.8 billion compared to
net income of $1.2 billion in fiscal 2012. The decrease took into account the impact of an income tax benefit of $166 million
related to the settlement of uncertain tax positions, including related interest and foreign exchange gains, restructuring charges
of $220 million related to the CORE program and the 2013 Goodwill Impairment Charge of $335 million incurred in fiscal
2013, as well as the impacts of the PlayBook Inventory Provision, the 2012 Goodwill Impairment Charge, the 2012 BlackBerry
28
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
7 Inventory Provision, the 2012 Service Interruption, and restructuring charges of $125 million related to the Company’s
previous cost optimization program incurred in fiscal 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the
Company’s gross margin, partially offset by a reduction in operating expenses and a recovery of income taxes. The Company’s
consolidated gross margin in fiscal 2013 was negatively impacted by the lower shipment volumes due to the Company’s aging
product portfolio in a very competitive environment in which multiple competitors introduced new devices beginning in early
fiscal 2013 as well as the continuation of pricing initiatives to drive sell-through for BlackBerry 7 handheld devices and the
impact of allocating certain fixed costs, including licensing costs, to lower shipment volumes, compared to fiscal 2012. The
decrease in gross margin was partially offset by the higher average selling prices of BlackBerry 10 devices shipped, favorable
renegotiations of key contracts associated with elements of the Company’s hardware business and benefits from a leaner and
re-architected supply chain.
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations were both $1.20 in fiscal 2013, compared to basic and diluted
earnings per share ("EPS") from continuing operations of $2.23 in fiscal 2012.
The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 524 million common shares for basic and diluted loss per share for the
fiscal year ended March 2, 2013 and the fiscal year ended March 3, 2012.
Common Shares Outstanding
On March 26, 2013, there were 524 million voting common shares, options to purchase 7.2 million voting common shares,
15.1 million restricted share units and 0.3 million deferred share units outstanding.
29
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Summary Results of Continuing Operations
Three months ended March 1, 2014 compared to the three months ended March 2, 2013
The following table sets forth certain unaudited consolidated statement of operations data, which is expressed in millions of
dollars, except for share and per share amounts and as a percentage of revenue, for the three months ended March 1, 2014 and
March 2, 2013:
For the Three Months Ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
(in million, except for share and per share amounts)
Change Fiscal
2014/2013
Revenue
Cost of sales (1)(2)
Gross margin
Operating expenses
Research and development(1)
Selling, marketing and administration(1)
Amortization
Debentures fair value adjustment(3)
Operating loss
Investment loss, net
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
Recovery of income taxes
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Income from discontinued operations
Net income (loss)
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from
continuing operations
Basic and diluted earnings per share from
discontinued operations
Total basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding
(000’s)
$
$
$
$
976
423
553
246
355
107
382
1,090
(537)
(20)
(557)
(134)
(423)
—
(423)
(0.80)
—
(0.80)
100.0 % $
43.3 %
56.7 %
25.2 %
36.4 %
11.0 %
39.1 %
111.7 %
(55.0)%
(2.0)%
(57.0)%
(13.7)%
(43.3)%
— %
(43.3)% $
$
$
2,678
1,603
1,075
383
523
181
—
1,087
(12)
(6)
(18)
(112)
94
4
98
0.18
0.01
0.19
Basic
Diluted
526,374
526,374
524,160
527,222
100.0 % $
59.9 %
40.1 %
14.3 %
19.5 %
6.8 %
— %
40.6 %
(0.5)%
(0.2)%
(0.7)%
(4.2)%
3.5 %
0.2 %
3.7 % $
(1,702)
(1,180)
(522)
(137)
(168)
(74)
382
3
(525)
(14)
(539)
(22)
(517)
(4)
(521)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Cost of sales included $17 million, research and development included $21 million, and selling, marketing and
administration expenses included $110 million in charges related to the Company’s CORE program and strategic
review process during fhe fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. See “Overview – CORE and Operational Restructuring”.
Cost of sales included the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery incurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. See
“Overview - Inventory Charges” and “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
The Company recorded the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Debentures Fair Value Adjustment of approximately $382 million in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. See “Overview - Debentures Fair Value Adjustment” and “Non-GAAP Financial
Measures”.
30
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Revenue
Revenue from continuing operations for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 was $976 million, a decrease of approximately $1.7
billion, or 63.6%, from $2.7 billion in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Comparative breakdowns of the significant revenue categories are set forth in the following table:
For the Three Months Ended
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
Change Fiscal 2014/2013
1.3
358
548
56
14
976
297
412
127
140
976
$
$
$
$
6.0
1,640
947
63
28
36.7% $
56.2%
5.7%
1.4%
61.2% $
35.4%
2.4%
1.0%
100.0% $
2,678
100.0% $
30.4% $
42.2%
13.0%
14.4%
587
1,227
479
385
21.9% $
45.8%
17.9%
14.4%
100.0% $
2,678
100.0% $
(4.7)
(78.3)%
(1,282)
(399)
(7)
(14)
(1,702)
(290)
(815)
(352)
(245)
(1,702)
(78.2)%
(42.1)%
(11.1)%
(50.0)%
(63.6)%
(49.4)%
(66.4)%
(73.5)%
(63.6)%
(63.6)%
Millions of BlackBerry handheld
devices recognized
Revenue (in millions)
Hardware
Service
Software
Other
Revenue by Geography (in millions)
North America
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Latin America
Asia Pacific
Revenue by Category
Hardware Revenue
Hardware revenue was $358 million, or 36.7% of consolidated revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, compared to $1.6
billion, or 61.2% of consolidated revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, representing a decrease of $1.3 billion or 78.2%.
The Company recognized revenue related to approximately 1.3 million BlackBerry handheld devices in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2014, reflecting a decrease of approximately 4.7 million devices, or 78.3%, compared to approximately 6.0 million
BlackBerry handheld devices in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Most devices recognized were BlackBerry 10 devices. The
Company believes that the significant decrease in hardware revenue over the prior fiscal year was primarily attributable to
decreased demand and lower sell-through for the Company's new devices, due to very intense competition. Significant
judgment is applied by the Company to determine whether shipments of devices have met the Company’s revenue recognition
criteria, as the analysis is dependent on many facts and circumstances. The Company also believes that previously disclosed
announcements concerning the Company's operational restructuring, recent management changes and the Company's
workforce reductions, may have continued to negatively impact demand for the Company's products in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2014. In order to improve sell-through levels and stimulate global demand for BlackBerry devices, the Company
continues to implement sell-through programs with its carrier and distributor partners. As previously disclosed, the Company
can no longer reasonably estimate the amount of the potential sell-through programs that may be offered on certain BlackBerry
devices in future periods, resulting in revenues for BlackBerry 10 devices, and BlackBerry 7 devices in certain regions, being
recognized when the devices sell through to end customers. See “Accounting Policies - Revenue Recognition”.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, approximately 3.4 million BlackBerry smartphones were sold through to end
customers, which included shipments made and recognized prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 and which reduced the
Company's inventory in channel. Of the devices that sold through to end customers in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014,
approximately 2.3 million were BlackBerry 7 devices. The number of BlackBerry smartphones that were sold through to
end customers was 4.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 and 7.7 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
31
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Service Revenue
Service revenue decreased by $399 million, or 42.1%, to $548 million, or 56.2% of consolidated revenue, in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2014, compared to $947 million, or 35.4% of consolidated revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Service
revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 included approximately $10 million relating to cash payments received on account
of previously deferred service revenue from carriers in Venezuela. The decrease in service revenue is primarily attributable to a
lower number of BlackBerry users and lower revenue from those users compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 and also
reflects the deferral of service access fees charged to customers in Venezuela in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 (the “Q4 Fiscal
2014 Venezuela Service Revenue Deferral”) and the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Argentina Service Revenue Deferral.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company provided an outlook that it expected service revenue to decline in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2014 by a percentage consistent with the decline experienced in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. Service
revenues for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 decreased by approximately 13% compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2014,
which is consistent with the decline experienced in the third quarter of fiscal 2014.
The year-over-year decrease also resulted from a continued shift in the mix of the Company’s customers from higher-tiered
unlimited plans to prepaid and lower-tiered plans as well as pricing reduction programs implemented by the Company to
maintain the customer base. BlackBerry customers continued to decline in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. As previously
disclosed, as BlackBerry 10 products use the Company's network infrastructure in a different manner than BlackBerry 7 and
previous versions, certain elements of the Company's current revenue model have changed. Users of Blackberry 10 devices
that require enhanced services, including advanced security, mobile device management and other services, continue to
generate monthly service revenue. Other BlackBerry 10 users who do not utilize such services, do not generate service
revenue. Service revenue continues to be generated by current and future users of BlackBerry 7 devices. The Company expects
service revenue to decline in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 by a percentage consistent with the decline experienced in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
The Q4 Fiscal 2014 Venezuela Service Revenue Deferral relates to the fact that, based on the recent political and economic
events that have occurred in Venezuela, combined with that country's existing and recently amended foreign currency
restrictions, the Company did not recognize any revenues related to service access fees charged to customers in Venezuela in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. The Company does not sell smartphones directly into the Venezuelan market, nor does it have
any operations in Venezuela. Moreover, the Company only invoices its carrier partners in Venezuela in U.S. dollars for service
access fees provided to the BlackBerry subscriber base. The invoices are reviewed by the carriers and subsequently, an
application is made by them to CADIVI in Venezuela to obtain the necessary U.S. dollars to settle their obligations to the
Company. Foreign currency restrictions and other foreign exchange mechanisms implemented by the Venezuelan government
have impacted the ability of the Company’s Venezuelan carrier partners to timely obtain U.S. dollars in exchange for
Venezuelan Bolivars, and the Company is continuing to monitor development in this area as it considers strategies to secure
payment of its outstanding invoices. The application and approval process continue to be delayed and the Company’s ability to
timely obtain U.S. dollars at the official exchange rate remains uncertain. The Company deferred all service revenue associated
with services rendered in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 of approximately $40 million. The Company also experienced
similar currency-related issues in Argentina in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, which led to the deterioration of collections
from the carriers to whom the Company provides services. As a result, the Company recorded the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Argentina
Service Revenue Deferral of approximately $13 million of service revenue associated with service access fees charged to
customers in Argentina in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
Software Revenue
Software revenue, which includes fees from licensed BES software, client assess licenses, technical support, maintenance,
upgrades and QNX software licensing revenues, decreased by $7 million, or 11.1%, to $56 million, or 5.7% of consolidated
revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, compared to $63 million, or 2.4% of consolidated revenue, in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2013. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in technical support revenue, partially offset by an increase
in revenue from QNX.
Other Revenue
Other revenue, which includes non-warranty repairs, accessories, licensing revenues and gains and losses on revenue hedging
instruments, decreased by $14 million or 50.0%, to $14 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to $28 million in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in non-warranty repair revenues and also
reflects losses on revenue hedging instruments incurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. See “Market Risk of Financial
Instruments – Foreign Exchange” for additional information on the Company’s hedging instruments.
32
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Revenue by Geography
North America Revenues
Revenues in North America were $297 million, or 30.4% of consolidated revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014,
reflecting a decrease of $290 million compared to $587 million, or 21.9% of consolidated revenue, in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2013. The decrease in North American revenue is primarily attributable to a decrease in revenue from the United States,
which represented approximately 23.8% of total consolidated revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, compared to 14.2%
of total consolidated revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Revenues in the United States have continued to decline and
subscriber attrition has remained high due to the intense competition faced by the Company in this market. Sales in Canada
represented approximately 6.7% of the consolidated revenue.
Europe, Middle East and Africa Revenues
Revenues in Europe, Middle East and Africa were $412 million or 42.2% of consolidated revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2014, reflecting a decrease of $815 million compared to $1.2 billion or 45.8% of consolidated revenue in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2013. Some of the larger markets comprising this region include the United Kingdom, Germany and South Africa. In the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company continued to launch BlackBerry smartphones in certain countries in this region,
including the Z30 in Austria and Hungary, the 9982 in the the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia as well as the 9720 in
Bulgaria.
Latin America Revenues
Revenues in Latin America were $127 million or 13.0% of consolidated revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, reflecting
a decrease of $352 million compared to $479 million or 17.9% of consolidated revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela are some of the larger markets comprising this region. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the
Company launched BlackBerry 10 smartphones in certain countries in this region, including the Z30 in Jamaica, Venezuela and
Chile as well as the Q5 in Mexico.
Asia Pacific Revenues
Revenues in Asia Pacific were $140 million or 14.4% of consolidated revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, reflecting a
decrease of $245 million compared to $385 million or 14.4% of consolidated revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Some
of the larger markets comprising this region include Indonesia and India. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company
launched BlackBerry smartphones in certain countries in this region, including the 9982 and 9720 in Hong Kong as well as the
Q5 in New Zealand.
Gross Margin
Consolidated gross margin from continuing operations decreased by $522 million, or 48.6%, to $553 million, or 56.7% of
consolidated revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, compared to $1.1 billion, or 40.1% of consolidated revenue, in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Excluding the impact of the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery and charges related to the CORE
program incurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, of which $17 million was attributable to cost of sales (see “Non-GAAP
Financial Measures”), and the impact of charges related to the CORE program incurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, of
which a recovery of $4 million was attributable to cost of sales, gross margin decreased by $650 million.
The $650 million decrease in consolidated gross margin was primarily attributable to decreases in service revenue and the
number of devices for which revenue was recognized compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Most of the devices
recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 were BlackBerry 10 devices, which had lower gross margins than BlackBerry 7
devices due to the current sell-through programs offered on BlackBerry 10 smartphones. The decrease in consolidated gross
margin also reflects the Company's fixed costs being allocated over lower shipment volumes. Hardware revenues have lower
gross margins than the Company’s consolidated gross margin. Service revenues earn higher gross margins than sales of
handheld devices.
Operating Expenses
The table below presents a comparison of research and development, selling, marketing and administration, and amortization
expenses for the quarter ended March 1, 2014, compared to the quarter ended November 30, 2013 and the quarter ended
March 2, 2013. The Company believes that it is meaningful to also provide a comparison between the fourth quarter of fiscal
2014 and the third quarter of fiscal 2014 given that the Company’s quarterly operating results vary substantially.
33
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
For the Three Months Ended
(in millions)
March 1, 2014
November 30, 2013
March 2, 2013
Revenue
Operating expenses
Research and development(1)
Selling, marketing and administration(1)
Amortization
Impairment of long-lived assets(2)
Impairment of goodwill
Debentures fair value adjustment(3)
Total
$
$
976
246
355
107
—
—
382
1,090
% of
Revenue
% of
Revenue
% of
Revenue
$
1,193
$
2,678
25.2%
36.4%
11.0%
—%
—%
39.1%
111.7% $
322
548
148
2,748
—
(5)
3,761
27.0 %
45.9 %
12.4 %
230.3 %
— %
(0.4)%
383
523
181
—
—
—
14.3%
19.5%
6.8%
—%
—%
—%
315.2 % $
1,087
40.6%
(1)
(2)
(3)
Research and development and selling, marketing and administration expenses for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014
included charges of approximately $21 million and $110 million, respectively, related to the Company's CORE
program.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company recorded the LLA Impairment Charge of approximately $2.7 billion.
See “Overview - Long-Lived Asset Impairment Charge” and “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company recorded the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Debentures Fair Value Adjustment of
approximately $382 million. See “Overview - Debentures Fair Value Adjustment" and “Non-GAAP Financial
Measures”.
Operating expenses decreased by $2.7 billion, or 71.0%, to $1.1 billion, or 111.7% of revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2014, compared to $3.8 billion, or 315.2% of revenue, in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. Excluding the impact of the Q4 Fiscal
2014 Debentures Fair Value Adjustment and charges incurred as part of the Company's CORE program during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2014, of which $131 million were attributable to operating expenditures, as well as the impact of the LLA
Impairment Charge of approximately $2.7 billion and the charges incurred as part of the CORE program during the third
quarter of fiscal 2014, of which $190 million were attributable to operating expenditures, operating expenses decreased by
$246 million (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”). The decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in consulting,
advertising and promotion spend, salaries and benefit costs due to a reduction in headcount related to the CORE program and
research and development device costs as a result of the cancellation of two planned devices.
Operating expenses decreased by $3 million, or 0.3%, to $1.1 billion, or 111.7% of revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014,
compared to $1.1 billion or 40.6% of revenue, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Excluding the impact of the Q4 Fiscal 2014
Debentures Fair Value Adjustment and charges incurred as part of the CORE program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014,
of which $131 million were attributable to operating expenditures (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”) and charges incurred
as part of the CORE program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, of which $33 million were attributable to operating
expenses, operating expenses decreased by $477 million. This decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in marketing
and advertising expenses, salaries and benefits due to a reduction in headcount related to the CORE program, consulting,
outsourcing and legal costs and research and development device costs as a result of the cancellation of two planned devices.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expenses decreased by $76 million, or 23.6% to $246 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014
compared to $322 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. Excluding the impact of charges related to the CORE program
incurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 of $21 million, that were attributable to research and development
expenditures, and the charges related to the CORE program incurred during the third quarter of fiscal 2014 of $37 million, that
were attributable to research and development expenditures, research and development expenses decreased by $60 million,
which was primarily attributable to decreases in salaries and benefits costs due to a reduction in headcount related to the CORE
program, consulting and outsourcing costs and research and development device costs as a result of the cancellation of two
planned devices. Research and development related headcount decreased by approximately 11%, compared to the third quarter
of fiscal 2014.
Research and development expenses decreased by $137 million, or 35.8% to $246 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014
compared to $383 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Excluding the impact of charges incurred as part of the CORE
program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, of which $21 million were attributable to research and development
34
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
expenditures, and charges incurred as part of the CORE program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 of $3 million, that
were attributable to research and development expenditures, research and development expenses decreased by $155 million.
This decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in salaries and benefits costs due to a reduction in headcount related to the
CORE program, consulting and outsourcing costs, and research and development device costs as a result of the cancellation of
two planned devices. Research and development related headcount decreased by approximately 30%, compared to the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2013.
Selling, Marketing and Administration Expenses
Selling, marketing and administration expenses decreased by $193 million, or 35.2% to $355 million in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2014 compared to $548 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2014. Excluding the impact of charges related to the CORE
program incurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, of which $110 million was attributable to selling, marketing and
administration expenditures, and the charges incurred as part of the CORE program during the third quarter of fiscal 2014, of
which $153 million was attributable to selling, marketing and administration, selling marketing and administration expenses
decreased by $150 million. This decrease was primarily attributable to consulting, advertising and promotion spend as well as
salaries and benefit costs due to a reduction in headcount related to the CORE program. Selling, marketing and administration
related headcount decreased by approximately 14%, compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2014.
Selling, marketing and administration expenses decreased by $168 million, or 32.1% to $355 million in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2014 compared to $523 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Excluding the impact of charges incurred as part of
the CORE program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, of which $110 million was attributable to selling, marketing and
administration expenditures, and the charges incurred as part of the CORE program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, of
which $30 million was attributable to selling, marketing and administration, selling, marketing and administration expenses
decreased by $248 million. This decrease was primarily attributable to advertising and promotion spend as well as salaries and
benefit costs due to a reduction in headcount related to the CORE program. Headcount related to selling, marketing and
administration functions decreased by approximately 36%, as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Amortization Expense
The table below presents a comparison of amortization expense relating to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
recorded as amortization or cost of sales for the quarter ended March 1, 2014 compared to the quarter ended March 2, 2013.
Intangible assets are comprised of intellectual property and acquired technology.
For the Three Months Ended
(in millions)
Included in Amortization
Included in Cost of sales
March 1,
2014
March 2,
2013
Change
March 1,
2014
March 2,
2013
Change
$
$
51
56
107
$
$
103
78
181
$
$
(52) $
(22)
(74) $
16
80
96
$
$
77
136
213
$
$
(61)
(56)
(117)
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Total
Amortization
Amortization expense relating to certain property, plant and equipment and certain intangible assets decreased by $74 million to
$107 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to $181 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The decrease
in amortization expense reflects the lower cost base of LLA as a result of the LLA Impairment Charge recorded on November
4, 2013, in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 as well as reduced spending on capital and intangible assets, partially offset by
certain property, plant and equipment and intangible asset additions made over the last four quarters.
Cost of sales
Amortization expense relating to certain property, plant and equipment and certain intangible assets employed in the
Company’s manufacturing operations and BlackBerry service operations decreased by $117 million to $96 million for the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to $213 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. This decrease primarily reflects the
impact of amortizing intangible assets over lower shipment volumes and the lower cost base of LLA as a result of the LLA
Impairment Charge recorded on November 4, 2013, in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. The decrease was partially offset by
renewed or amended licensing agreements and certain property, plant and equipment asset additions made over the last four
quarters.
35
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Investment Income
Investment income decreased by $14 million to a loss of $20 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 from a loss of $6
million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The decrease in investment income is primarily attributable to interest costs
associated with the Company’s Debentures, which was partially offset by difference in the recognition of the Company's
portion of investment losses in its equity-based investments. See “Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources”
below.
Income Taxes
For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company’s income tax recovery from continuing operations was $134 million,
resulting in an effective income tax recovery rate of approximately 24.2%, compared to an income tax recovery from
continuing operations of $112 million and an effective income tax recovery rate of approximately 622.2% for the same period
in the prior fiscal year. The Company’s effective income tax recovery rate reflects the geographic mix of earnings in
jurisdictions with different income tax rates. The Company’s 24.2% effective income tax recovery rate in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2014 reflects the recognition of additional deferred tax recoveries and the recognition of additional deferred tax valuation
allowance, which is more fully described below.
The Company regularly assesses the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. In making that assessment,
the Company considers both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets to
determine, based on the weight of available evidence, whether it is more-likely-than-not that some or all of the deferred tax
assets will be realized. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, the Company noted that there were significant
increases in deductible temporary differences in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 in relation to the LLA Impairment Charge,
which was not currently deductible for tax purposes. In addition, the Company has three years of cumulative losses for fiscal
2014. As a result, the Company was unable to recognize the benefit relating to a significant portion of deferred tax assets that
arose in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, which resulted in a $55 million valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.
The deferred tax recovery is partially offset by this deferred tax valuation allowance of $55 million and included in the income
tax provision in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. This accounting treatment has no effect on the Company’s actual ability to
utilize deferred tax assets to reduce future cash tax payments. The Company will continue to assess the likelihood that the
deferred tax assets will be realizable at each reporting period and the valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly.
During the third quarter, the Company took steps to accelerate the receipt of a portion of the tax refund to which it is entitled.
The Canadian federal and Ontario provincial Ministers of Finance had indicated to the Company that they would be prepared to
recommend measures such that the acceleration would not jeopardize the entitlement to the balance of its tax refund. The
Company's actions resulted in a November 3, 2013 taxation year end, which triggered the entitlement to the accrued tax refund
accrued of $696 million, which the Company received prior to November 30, 2013. In December 2013, Remission Orders were
made by the Canadian federal and Ontario provincial governments which preserved the Company's ability to carry back losses
for the balance of fiscal 2014 and for fiscal 2015 on the same basis as without the November 3, 2013 taxation year end. The
tax provision includes the impact of the Remission Orders in accordance with ASC 740 because they were made in the fourth
quarter.
The Company has provided for foreign withholding taxes of $32 million that would apply on the distribution of the earnings of
its non-Canadian subsidiaries as these earnings are no longer intended to be reinvested indefinitely by these subsidiaries.
Net Income (loss)
The Company’s net loss from continuing operations for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 was $423 million, or $0.80 per share
(basic and diluted), reflecting an unfavourable increase in net loss of $517 million compared to net income from continuing
operations of $94 million, or $0.18 per share (basic and diluted), in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The increase in net loss
from continuing operations includes the impacts in fiscal 2014 and 2013 of:
Fiscal 2014
• Q4 Fiscal 2014 Debentures Fair Value Adjustment;
the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery; and
•
restructuring charges of approximately $105 million, after tax, related to the Company's CORE program and strategic
•
review process.
Fiscal 2013
•
restructuring charges of approximately $20 million, after tax, related to the Company's CORE program incurred in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Excluding the items noted above (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”), the Company's net loss reflected an unfavourable
increase of $156 million. The increase in net loss is also attributable to a decrease in the Company's gross margin, partially
36
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
offset by an increase in the recovery of income taxes and a reduction in operating expenditures. The decrease in the Company's
consolidated gross margin in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 was attributable to decreases in service revenue and the number
of devices for which revenue was recognized compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The decrease in consolidated gross
margin also reflects the Company's fixed costs being allocated over lower shipment volumes. Hardware revenues have lower
gross margins than the Company’s consolidated gross margin. Service revenues earn higher gross margins than sales of
handheld devices.
The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 526 million common shares for basic and diluted loss per share for the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 524 million common shares for basic
earnings per share and 527 million for diluted earnings per share for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
37
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
The following table sets forth the Company’s unaudited quarterly consolidated results of operations data for each of the eight
most recent quarters, including the quarter ended March 1, 2014. The information in the table below has been derived from the
Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements that, in management’s opinion, have been prepared on a basis
consistent with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and include all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of information when read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company. The
Company’s quarterly operating results have varied substantially in the past and may vary substantially in the future.
Accordingly, the information below is not necessarily indicative of results for any future quarter.
Fiscal Year 2014
Fiscal Year 2013
Fourth
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
(in millions, except per share data)
$
976
553
1,090
$
1,193
$
(1,264)
3,761
1,573
(374)
1,058
$
3,071
$
2,678
$
2,727
$
2,861
$
2,808
1,042
1,211
1,075
1,087
830
1,060
744
1,102
786
1,421
(20)
—
(6)
5
(6)
18
—
3
(557)
(5,025)
(1,438)
(164)
(18)
(212)
(358)
(632)
(134)
(624)
(473)
(423)
(4,401)
(965)
(80)
(84)
(112)
(226)
(129)
(122)
94
$
14
(229)
(510)
—
—
$
(423) $ (4,401) $
—
(965) $
—
(84) $
4
98
$
(5)
9
$
(6)
(235) $
(8)
(518)
$
(0.80) $
(8.37) $
(1.84) $
(0.16) $
0.18
$
0.03
$
(0.44) $
(0.97)
—
—
—
—
0.01
(0.01)
(0.01)
(0.02)
$
$
(0.80) $
(8.37) $
(1.84) $
(0.16) $
0.19
246
$
322
$
360
$
358
$
383
355
107
—
—
382
548
148
2,748
—
(5)
527
171
—
—
—
673
180
—
—
—
523
181
—
—
—
$
$
0.02
393
487
180
—
—
—
$
$
(0.45) $
(0.99)
366
$
367
556
180
—
—
—
547
172
—
335
—
$
1,090
$
3,761
$
1,058
$
1,211
$
1,087
$
1,060
$
1,102
$
1,421
Revenue
Gross margin
Operating expenses
Investment income (loss),
net
Income (loss) from
continuing operations, before
income taxes
Provision for (recovery of)
income taxes
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
Loss from discontinued
operations, net of tax
Net income (loss)
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share from
continuing operations
Basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share from
discontinued operations
Total basic and diluted
earnings (loss) per share
Research and development
Selling, marketing and
administration
Amortization
Impairment of long-lived
assets
Impairment of goodwill
Debentures fair value
adjustment
Operating expenses
38
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments decreased by $217 million to $2.7 billion as at March 1, 2014 from $2.9 billion as at
March 2, 2013, primarily as a result of the Company's net loss and net changes in working capital, partially offset by proceeds
from the issuance of the Debentures. Substantially all of the Company’s cash, cash equivalents, and investments are
denominated in U.S. dollars as at March 1, 2014.
A comparative summary of cash, cash equivalents, and investments is set out below:
Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term investments
Long-term investments
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments
As at
(in millions)
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
Change
$
$
1,579
$
1,549
$
950
129
1,105
221
2,658
$
2,875
$
30
(155)
(92)
(217)
The table below summarizes the current assets, current liabilities, and working capital of the Company:
Current assets
Current liabilities
Working capital
Current Assets
As at
(in millions)
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
Change
$
$
5,057
2,268
2,789
$
$
7,441
3,460
3,981
(2,384)
(1,192)
(1,192)
The decrease in current assets of $2.4 billion at the end of fiscal 2014 from the end of fiscal 2013 was primarily due to
decreases in accounts receivable of $1.4 billion, inventories of $359 million, income taxes receivable of $224 million, short
term investments of $155 million and other receivables of $120 million.
At March 1, 2014, accounts receivable was $972 million, a decrease of $1.4 billion from March 2, 2013. The decrease reflects
the lower revenues recognized during fiscal 2014 as well as an increase in days sales outstanding to 111.2 days in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2014 from 79.9 days at the end of fiscal 2013. Inventories decreased by $359 million at the end of fiscal 2014
compared to March 2, 2013, primarily due to the Q3 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge and the Z10 Inventory Charge, which were
partially offset by the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Recovery and purchases of inventory. See “Overview - Inventory Charges”
and “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
As of March 1, 2014, the Company has accounts receivables outstanding related to service access fees provided to wireless
service providers in Venezuela and Argentina. See “Results of Continuing Operations - Fiscal year ended March 1, 2014
compared to fiscal year ended March 2, 2013 - Revenue - Revenue by Category - Service Revenue” for a discussion of the
Fiscal 2014 Venezuela Service Revenue Deferral and the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Argentina Service Revenue Deferral incurred in fiscal
2014. In fiscal 2014, the Company collected funds related to services rendered of $114 million, which includes services
rendered in previous periods, from customers in Venezuela. The Company continues to face challenges in obtaining timely
payments on its receivables and will continue to closely monitor its collection efforts in future periods.
The Company also sells products and provides services in additional foreign jurisdictions including Asia-Pacific, the Middle
East and Latin America, which expose the Company to political, legal and economic uncertainties and may limit the
Company’s ability to collect on its sales generating activities, which may have a negative impact on the Company’s cash
balance. These uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
•
•
challenges with enforcing contracts in local courts;
currency devaluations in hyper-inflationary markets resulting in a loss of revenues due to their inability to
procure the Company’s our products and services in the future; and
stringent and evolving currency exchange restrictions and controls which have resulted and could result in
further extended delays or other challenges in the recognition of revenue and the collection of accounts
receivables.
39
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and the “Risk Factors” section of the AIF, which is
included in the Annual Report, including the risk factor titled “The Company is subject to risks inherent in foreign operations”.
Current Liabilities
The decrease in current liabilities of $1.2 billion at the end of fiscal 2014 from the end of fiscal 2013 was primarily due to
decreases in accrued liabilities and accounts payable, partially offset by an increase in deferred revenue. As at March 1, 2014,
accrued liabilities were $1.2 billion, reflecting a decrease of $640 million compared to March 2, 2013, which was primarily
attributable to decreases in accrued royalties, employee incentives and warranty liabilities, partially offset by an increase in
vendor liabilities reflecting the Q3 Fiscal 2014 Inventory Charge, the Z10 Inventory Charge and the Q4 Fiscal 2014 Inventory
Recovery. Deferred revenue was $580 million, which reflects an increase of $38 million compared to March 2, 2013 due to an
increase in the volume of transactions that did not meet the criteria for revenue recognition as at March 1, 2014. Accounts
payable was $474 million as at March 1, 2014, reflecting a decrease of $590 million from March 2, 2013, which was primarily
attributable to timing of purchases at the end of fiscal 2014 compared to the end of fiscal 2013.
Cash flows for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014 compared to the fiscal year ended March 2, 2013 were as follows:
Net cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Effect of foreign exchange gain (loss) on cash and cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Operating Activities
For the Fiscal Year Ended
(in millions)
March 1, 2014
March 2, 2013
$
$
(159) $
(1,040)
1,224
5
30
$
2,303
(2,240)
(36)
(5)
22
Net cash flows used in operating activities were $159 million for fiscal 2014 compared to net cash flows provided by operating
activities of $2.3 billion in fiscal 2013. The decrease primarily reflects the net loss incurred in fiscal 2014, partially offset by
changes in net working capital compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.
Investing Activities
During the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, cash flows used in investing activities were $1.0 billion and included intangible
asset additions of $1.1 billion, acquisitions of property, plant and equipment of $283 million and business acquisitions of $7
million, which were partially offset by cash flows provided by transactions involving the proceeds on sale or maturity of short-
term and long-term investments, net of the costs of acquisitions in the amount of $281 million and proceeds on the sale of
property, plant and equipment $49 million. For the same period of the prior fiscal year, cash flows used in investing activities
were $2.2 billion and included intangible asset additions of $1.0 billion, property, plant and equipment additions of $418
million and business acquisitions of $60 million, offset by cash flows used in transactions involving the proceeds on sale or
maturity of short-term investments and long-term investments, net of the costs of acquisitions, in the amount of $762 million.
During the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, the additions of intangible assets primarily consisted of payments relating to
amended or renewed licensing agreements, as well as agreements with third parties for the use of intellectual property,
software, messaging services and other BlackBerry related features. The decrease in additions of property, plant and equipment
for fiscal 2014 was primarily due to the cost saving initiatives of the CORE program, reflecting the Company’s targeted
investment approach in research and development and manufacturing, as well as its continued investment in network
infrastructure, which remains a strategic priority for the Company. In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company expects
capital expenditures to be approximately $50 million.
Financing Activities
Cash flows provided by financing activities were $1.2 billion for fiscal 2014, reflecting an increase of $1.3 billion from fiscal
2013 and is primarily attributable to the Company's issuance of the Debentures. See “Overview - Strategic Review, Debenture
Financing and Management Changes”.
40
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The following table sets out aggregate information about the Company’s contractual obligations and the periods in which
payments are due as at March 1, 2014:
Operating lease obligations
Purchase obligations and commitments
Long-term debt interest and principal
payments
Total
Total
Less than One
Year
196
$
47
$
1,206
501
1,206
75
1,903
$
1,328
$
$
$
(in millions)
One to
Three Years
Four to Five
Years
Greater than
Five Years
67
—
150
217
$
$
45
—
150
195
$
$
37
—
126
163
Purchase obligations and commitments amounted to approximately $1.2 billion as at March 1, 2014, with purchase orders with
contract manufacturers representing approximately $586 million of the total. The Company also has commitments on account
of capital expenditures of approximately $9 million included in this total, primarily for manufacturing and information
technology, including service operations. The remaining balance consists of purchase orders or contracts with suppliers of raw
materials, as well as other goods and services utilized in the operations of the Company including payments on account of
licensing agreements. The expected timing of payments and actual amounts to be paid for these purchase obligations and
commitments is estimated based upon current information and the Company’s existing contractual arrangements with
suppliers. The timing of payments and actual amounts paid may differ from estimates depending upon the timing of receipt of
goods and services, changes to agreed-upon amounts for certain obligations, and payment terms or changes to the contractual
relationships between the Company and its suppliers. The Company’s purchase obligations and commitments generally
increase or decrease along with the demand for the Company’s products, or as new service offerings are either launched or
exited.
Credit Facilities and Other Funding Sources
On November 13, 2013, Fairfax and other institutional investors acquired the Debentures, with an option to purchase an
additional $250 million principal amount of Debentures. On December 12, 2013, the Company announced that the expiry of the
option to purchase additional Debentures had been extended from December 13, 2013 to January 13, 2014. In January 2014,
the Company announced that Fairfax had completed the purchase, through its subsidiaries, of an additional $250 million
principal amount of Debentures.
Interest on the Debentures is payable quarterly in arrears at a rate of 6% per annum. The Debentures have a term of seven
years and each $1,000 principal amount of Debentures is convertible at any time into 100 common shares of the Company, for
a total of 125 million common shares at a price of $10.00 per share for all Debentures, subject to adjustments. The Debentures
are subject to a change of control provision whereby the Company would be required to make an offer to repurchase the
Debentures at 115% of par value if a person or group acquires 35% of the Company’s outstanding common shares, acquires all
or substantially all of its assets, or if the Company merges with another entity and the Company’s existing shareholders hold
less than 50% of the common shares of the surviving entity. The Company is not required to make that offer to Fairfax, its
affiliates or any of their joint actors, if they have caused such a change of control.
The Company has the option to redeem the Debentures after November 13, 2016 at specified redemption prices in specified
periods. Covenants associated with the Debentures include limitations on the Company’s total indebtedness. Under specified
events of default, the outstanding principal and any accrued interest on the Debentures become immediately due and payable
upon request of 25% of the Debenture holders. During the continuance of an event of default, the interest rate rises to 10% per
annum.
The Company has a $525 million asset-backed lending arrangement (the “Facility”) for working capital and general corporate
purposes with a syndicate of commercial banks. The Facility, which is subject to certain availability criteria and limits and
customary financial covenants, expires on August 27, 2016 and is secured by the Company’s accounts receivable, inventory,
equipment, mortgages on certain real property and a stock pledge of certain subsidiaries. There can be no assurance that the
Facility will continue to be available on its current terms or at all. The Company has utilized approximately $5 million of the
Facility for its outstanding letters of credit as of March 1, 2014.
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments were $2.7 billion as at March 1, 2014. To mitigate the pressure on the Company's cash
flows, the Company's management is focused on maintaining appropriate cash balances, efficiently managing working capital
balances and the significant reduction in capital investments through the CORE program and its operational restructuring, and
remains focused on managing the liquidity needs of the business. In addition, as described above, the Company continues to
41
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
pursue opportunities to attain further cost savings in the coming fiscal quarters as it executes on its operational restructuring
plan noted above. The Company has also identified additional opportunities to generate liquidity through the anticipated receipt
of a $413 million Canadian income tax refund in the first half of fiscal 2015 and the dispositions of assets, classified as held for
sale on the Company's balance sheets. The Company has also announced that it has entered into an agreement for the
divestiture of the majority of its real estate holdings in Canada, with an expected closing in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.
Based on its current financial projections, the Company believes its financial resources, including the proceeds from the
Debentures, the tax refund received in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 and the tax refund expected to be received in the first half
of fiscal 2015, together with expected future operating cash generating and operating expense reduction activities, available
borrowings under the Facility and access to other potential financing arrangements should be sufficient to meet funding
requirements for current financial commitments, for future operating expenditures not yet committed and should provide the
necessary financial capacity for the foreseeable future. However, as noted above, the Company’s expectations with respect to
its cash position and future liquidity are forward-looking statements that are subject to many risks, including the inherent risk
of difficulties in forecasting the Company’s financial results and performance for future periods, particularly over longer
periods, given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles
that characterize the wireless communications industry. These difficulties in forecasting the Company's financial results and
performance are magnified at the present time given the uncertainties related to the Company's operational restructuring, recent
management changes and strategic initiatives described in this MD&A. See “Overview - CORE and Operational
Restructuring”, “Overview - Strategic Review, Debenture Financing and Management Changes”, “Overview - Strategic
Initiatives”, “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and the “Risk Factors” section of the AIF, which
is included in the Annual Report, including the risk factor titled “The Company’s ability to maintain or increase its liquidity, its
existing cash balance, its ability to access existing or potential alternative sources of funding, the sufficiency of its financial
resources, and its ability to service its debt, could be adversely affected by its ability to offer competitive products and services
in a timely manner at competitive prices, its ability to collect accounts receivables in jurisdictions with foreign currency
controls and its access to the capital markets”.The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in
Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or under applicable Canadian
securities laws.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in litigation in the normal course of its business, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. The Company
is subject to a variety of claims (including claims related to patent infringement, purported class actions and other claims in the
normal course of business) and may be subject to additional claims either directly or through indemnities against claims that it
provides to certain of its partners and customers. In particular, the industry in which the Company competes has many
participants that own, or claim to own, intellectual property, including participants that have been issued patents and may have
filed patent applications or may obtain additional patents and proprietary rights for technologies similar to those used by the
Company in its products. The Company has received, and may receive in the future, assertions and claims from third parties
that the Company’s products infringe on their patents or other intellectual property rights. Litigation has been, and will likely
continue to be, necessary to determine the scope, enforceability and validity of third-party proprietary rights or to establish the
Company’s proprietary rights. Regardless of whether claims against the Company have merit, those claims could be time-
consuming to evaluate and defend, result in costly litigation, divert management’s attention and resources, subject the Company
to significant liabilities and could have the other effects that are described in greater detail under “Risk Factors” in the
Company’s Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, which is included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 40-F, including the risk factors entitled “The Company is subject to general commercial litigation, class action
and other litigation claims as part of its operations, and it could suffer significant litigation expenses in defending these claims
and could be subject to significant damage awards or other remedies” and “The Company may infringe on the intellectual
property rights of others”.
Management reviews all of the relevant facts for each claim and applies judgment in evaluating the likelihood and, if
applicable, the amount of any potential loss. Where it is considered probable for a material exposure to result and where the
amount of the claim is quantifiable, provisions for loss are made based on management’s assessment of the likely outcome. The
Company does not provide for claims that are considered unlikely to result in a significant loss, claims for which the outcome
is not determinable or claims where the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated. Any settlements or awards under
such claims are provided for when reasonably determinable.
Though the Company does not believe the following legal proceedings will result in a significant loss, and does not believe
they are claims for which the outcomes are determinable or where the amounts of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the
Company has included the following summaries of certain of its legal proceedings that it believes may be of interest to its
investors.
42
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
On October 31, 2008, Mformation Technologies, Inc. (“Mformation”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Company
in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The patents in suit include U.S. Patent Nos. 6,970,917 and
7,343,408. These patents are generally directed to remote device management functionality. A jury trial began on June 19,
2012. On July 13, 2012, the jury found that the Company had infringed the asserted patent claims, awarding damages of $147.2
million. On August 8, 2012, Judge Ware overturned the jury verdict and granted judgment of non-infringement as a matter of
law. On September 5, 2012, Mformation filed a motion for a new trial. On September 6, 2012, Mformation filed a notice of
appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. However, the Federal Circuit deactivated the appeal while the
motion for new trial was pending. On September 20, 2012, the case was reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen, in view of Judge
Ware’s retirement from the bench. Judge Chen subsequently denied Mformation’s motion for new trial on November 15, 2012.
On December 4, 2012, the court denied Mformation’s motion for relief from costs. The Federal Circuit reactivated the appeal
on December 20, 2012 after Mformation filed a new notice of appeal. On January 3, 2013, a new entity, Mformation Software
Technologies, Inc. (“MST”), filed a motion to substitute parties, alleging that Mformation had dissolved and that MST had
assumed the rights, but not the liabilities, to the litigation. On January 14, 2013, the Company filed an opposition to MST’s
motion, combined with a motion to dismiss. On April 8, 2013, MST filed its opening substantive brief. On November 21,
2013, after a limited remand to the District Court, the Federal Circuit denied both MST’s motion to substitute and the
Company’s motion to dismiss. On December 23, 2013, the Company filed its responsive substantive brief, and MST filed a
reply brief on January 9, 2014. Proceedings are ongoing.
On April 2, 2012, NXP B.V. (“NXP”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of
Florida (Orlando Division). NXP asserted that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,330,455; 6,434,654; 6,501,420;
5,597,668; 5,639,697; and 5,763,955. NXP alleges that its patents are generally directed to certain wireless technologies
including 802.11 standards GPS and embedded memory technology, as well as certain methods of manufacture for
semiconductor devices. The complaint seeks monetary damages, an injunction, and other relief that the court deems just and
proper. The Company filed its Answer on May 30, 2012. Prior to trial, NXP dropped patents 5,597,668; 5,639,697; and
5,763,955. The trial began on March 24, 2014. Proceedings are ongoing.
On September 10, 2013, Cypress Semiconductor Corp. (“Cypress”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California. Cypress asserted that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 6,012,103;
6,249,825; and 6,493,770, generally relating to reconfiguration of a peripheral device connected to a host computer. Cypress
also asserted that the Company infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 8,004,497; 8,059,015; and 8,519,973, generally relating to capacitive
touchscreens. The complaint seeks an injunction, monetary damages, and other relief that the court deems just and proper. On
November 4, 2013, the Company filed an answer and counterclaims. The Company asserted that Cypress infringes U.S. Patent
Nos. 7,834,586, 7,986,127, and 8,169,187, generally directed to USB charging. The counterclaims seek an injunction, monetary
damages, and other relief that the court deems just and proper. On December 2, 2013, Cypress filed an answer to the
Company’s counterclaims. Proceedings are ongoing.
On November, 4, 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit against Cypress Semiconductor Corp. (“Cypress”) in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of Texas. The Company asserted that Cypress infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,034,623, generally
directed to a radio modem with radio and telemetry functions, and U.S. Patent No. 6,833,686, generally directed to an adaptive
rate battery charging circuit. On January 13, 2014, Cypress filed an answer to the complaint. On January 30, 2014, Cypress
filed petitions for inter partes review for both patents in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. On February 4, 2014, Cypress
filed a motion to stay the lawsuit pending the inter partes reviews. Proceedings are ongoing.
On January 3, 2014, the Company filed a lawsuit against Typo Products LLC (“Typo”) in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California. The Company asserted that Typo infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,629,964, and 8,162,552,
generally directed to a keyboard for use with a mobile communication device. The Company also asserted that Typo infringed
U.S. Design Patent No. D685,775, generally directed to a keyboard design, and trade dress relating to keyboards. The
complaint seeks an injunction, monetary damages, and other relief that the court deems just and proper. On January 22, 2014,
the Company filed a motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin Typo from infringing U.S. Patent No. 7,629,964 and U.S.
Design Patent No. D.685,775. Typo filed its opposition on February 5, 2014, and the Company filed a reply on February 12,
2014. Proceedings are ongoing.
Between May and August 2011, several purported class action lawsuits were filed against the Company and certain of its
present or former officers in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, two of which have been voluntarily
dismissed. On January 6, 2012, Judge Richard S. Sullivan consolidated the remaining three actions and appointed both lead
plaintiff and counsel. On April 5, 2012, plaintiff filed the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, alleging that during
the period from December 16, 2010 through June 16, 2011, the Company and certain of its officers made materially false and
misleading statements regarding the Company’s financial condition and business prospects, and seek unspecified damages.
Defendants brought a motion to dismiss the claim with prejudice, which was granted on March 29, 2013. On April 25, 2013,
43
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal. The appeal was argued on November 7, 2013 with judgment reserved. Proceedings are
ongoing.
Between October and December 2013, several purported class action lawsuits and one individual lawsuit were filed against the
Company and certain of its former officers in various jurisdictions alleging that during the period from September 27, 2012
through September 20, 2013, the Company and certain of its officers made materially false and misleading statements
regarding the Company’s financial condition and business prospects and that certain of the Company’s financial statements
contain material misstatements. The individual lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed. The purported class action claims seek
unspecified damages. Motions for the appointment of Lead Plaintiff and counsel have been filed in the U.S. proceedings.
Proceedings are ongoing in all cases.
Market Risk of Financial Instruments
The Company is engaged in operating and financing activities that generate risk in three primary areas:
Foreign Exchange
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk as a result of transactions in currencies other than its functional currency, the
U.S. dollar. The majority of the Company’s revenues in fiscal 2014 are transacted in U.S. dollars. Portions of the revenues are
denominated in Canadian dollars, Euros and British Pounds. Purchases of raw materials are primarily transacted in U.S. dollars.
Other expenses, consisting mainly of salaries, certain operating costs and manufacturing overhead are incurred primarily in
Canadian dollars. At March 1, 2014, approximately 35% of cash and cash equivalents, 26% of accounts receivables and 12% of
accounts payable are denominated in foreign currencies (March 2, 2013 – 19%, 29% and 5%, respectively). These foreign
currencies primarily include the Canadian dollar, Euro and British Pound. As part of its risk management strategy, the Company
maintains net monetary asset and/or liability balances in foreign currencies and engages in foreign currency hedging activities
using derivative financial instruments, including currency forward contracts and currency options. The Company does not use
derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The principal currencies hedged include the Canadian dollar, Euro and British
Pound.
The Company enters into forward and option contracts to hedge exposures relating to anticipated foreign currency transactions.
These contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges with the effective portion of the change in fair value initially
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified to income when the hedged exposure
affects income. Any ineffective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is recognized in current period income. For the fiscal
year ended March 1, 2014, there was $4 million in realized losses on forward contracts which were ineffective upon maturity
(March 2, 2013 – $8 million in realized gains). As at March 1, 2014 and March 2, 2013, the outstanding derivatives designated
as cash flow hedges were considered to be fully effective. As at March 1, 2014, the net unrealized loss on these forward and
option contracts was approximately $8 million (March 2, 2013 – net unrealized losses of $8 million) and were recorded in other
current assets and accumulated other comprehensive income. Unrealized losses were recorded in accrued liabilities and
accumulated other comprehensive income.
The Company enters into forward and option contracts to hedge certain monetary assets and liabilities that are exposed to
foreign currency risk. The principal currencies hedged include the Canadian dollar, Euro and British Pound. These contracts are
not subject to hedge accounting; as a result, gains or losses are recognized in income each period, generally offsetting the
change in the U.S. dollar value of the hedged asset or liability. As at March 1, 2014, net unrealized losses (net of premium paid)
of $10 million were recorded (March 2, 2013 – net unrealized gains of $29 million). Unrealized gains associated with these
contracts were recorded in other current assets and selling, marketing and administration. Unrealized losses were recorded in
accrued liabilities and selling, marketing and administration.
Interest Rate
Cash and cash equivalents and investments are invested in certain instruments of varying maturities. Consequently, the
Company is exposed to interest rate risk as a result of holding investments of varying maturities. The fair value of investments,
as well as the investment income derived from the investment portfolio, will fluctuate with changes in prevailing interest rates.
The Company has also issued the Debentures with a fixed interest rate. Consequently, the Company is exposed to interest rate
risk as a result of the long term of the Debentures. The fair value of the Debentures will fluctuate with changes in prevailing
interest rates. The Company does not currently utilize interest rate derivative instruments to hedge its investment portfolio.
44
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Credit and Customer Concentration
The Company has historically been dependent on an increasing number of significant telecommunication carriers and
distribution partners and on larger more complex contracts with respect to sales of the majority of its products and services. The
Company has experienced significant sales growth in the past, resulting in the growth in its carrier customer base in terms of
numbers, sales and accounts receivable volumes, and in some instances, new or significantly increased credit limits. The
Company, in the normal course of business, monitors the financial condition of its customers and reviews the credit history of
each new customer. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts that corresponds to the specific credit risk of
its customers, historical trends and economic circumstances. The allowance as at March 1, 2014 was $17 million (March 2,
2013 -$17 million). The Company also places insurance coverage for a portion of its accounts receivable balances. There were
no customers that comprised more than 10% of accounts receivable as at March 1, 2014 (March 2, 2013 – no customers that
comprised more than 10%). Additionally, there were no customers that comprised more than 10% of the Company’s revenue in
fiscal 2014 (fiscal 2013 – no customers that comprised more than 10%; fiscal 2012 – no customers that comprised more than
10%).
The Company is exposed to credit risk on derivative financial instruments arising from the potential for counterparties to
default on their contractual obligations. The Company mitigates this risk by limiting counterparties to highly rated financial
institutions and by continuously monitoring their creditworthiness. The Company’s exposure to credit loss and market risk will
vary over time as a function of currency exchange rates. The Company measures its counterparty credit exposure as a
percentage of the total fair value of the applicable derivative instruments. Where the net fair value of derivative instruments
with any counterparty is negative, the Company deems the credit exposure to that counterparty to be nil. As at March 1, 2014,
the maximum credit exposure to a single counterparty, measured as a percentage of the total fair value of derivative instruments
with net unrealized gains was 100% (March 2, 2013 – 29%).
The Company is exposed to market price and credit risk on its investment portfolio. The Company reduces this risk by
investing in liquid, investment grade securities and by limiting exposure to any one entity or group of related entities. As at
March 1, 2014 no single issuer represented more than 33% of the total cash, cash equivalents and investments (March 2, 2013 –
no single issuer represented more than 22% of the total cash, cash equivalents and investments).
Market values are determined for each individual security in the investment portfolio. The Company assesses declines in the
value of individual investments for impairment to determine whether the decline is other-than-temporary. The Company makes
this assessment by considering available evidence including changes in general market conditions, specific industry and
individual company data, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial
condition, the near-term prospects of the individual investment and the Company’s ability and intent to hold the debt securities
to maturity. The Company did not record any other-than-temporary impairment charges for the fiscal year ended March 1,
2014.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Controls
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of March 1, 2014, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the
Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15
(e) under the U.S. Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that, as of such date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to give reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the U.S. Exchange Act is
(i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and
(ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the U.S. Exchange Act as a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and
effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S.
GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:
45
BlackBerry Limited
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
•
•
•
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use or
dispositions of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 1, 2014. In
making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of
March 1, 2014, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The Company’s independent auditors have issued an audit report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
This report is included with the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the fiscal year ended March 1, 2014, no changes were made to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
46
CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Exhibit 23.1
We consent to the use in this Annual Report [Form 40-F] of BlackBerry Limited (the "Company") for the year ended
March 1, 2014 of our reports dated March 28, 2014 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company
included herein, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements [Form S-8 Nos. 333-85294,
333-100684, 333-150470, 333-177149, 333-189880, 333-192986, and 333-192987] pertaining to the Company's
stock option plans of our reports dated March 28, 2014 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the
Company included herein, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Kitchener, Canada,
March 28, 2014
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, John Chen, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of BlackBerry Limited;
Exhibit 31.1
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
a.
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b.
significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
Date: March 28, 2014
/s/ John Chen
Name: John Chen
Title: Chief Executive Officer
I, James Yersh, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of BlackBerry Limited;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
a.
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b.
significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
Date: March 28, 2014
/s/ James Yersh
Name: James Yersh
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.1
In connection with the Annual Report of BlackBerry Limited (the “Registrant”) on Form 40-F for the year ended March 1,
2014, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John Chen, as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
and James Yersh, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.
/s/ John Chen
Name: John Chen
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 28, 2014
/s/ James Yersh
Name: James Yersh
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 28, 2014
This certification /accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.