2017 ANNUAL REPORT
BOK Financial: A Regional Banking Powerhouse
KEY STATISTICS:
Assets
Loans
Deposits
Fiduciary Assets
Assets Under Management
& Custody
December 31, 2017
$32.3 billion
$17.2 billion
$22.1 billion
$48.8 billion
$81.8 billion
Full-Service Banking Markets
Additional Mortgage Banking Markets
Additional Wealth Management Markets
2017 HIGHLIGHTS:
• 27th consecutive year of profitability
• 44% year-over-year increase in net income to $335 million
• Record revenue
• 13th consecutive year of dividend increases for stockholders
• Surpassed $80 billion of wealth management assets
under management and administration for the first time
in company history
• Named one of America’s most respected banks by
American Banker magazine
• Named Philanthropist of the Year by the Association
of Fundraising Professionals
On The Cover: Our BOK Financial logo shows images of employees volunteering with nonprofit organizations in the communities we serve.
Community engagement is a core value of BOK Financial, and reflects the deeply-ingrained philanthropic priorities of our leadership team.
Community Engagement
“Actively advance the communities we serve” is one of our core values, which the company, our employees, and our
leaders have demonstrated for more than a century. Through financial contributions and the generosity of our employees
giving their time and talent, BOK Financial makes a significant impact in the communities we serve.
We support initiatives that enhance the educational opportunities in our communities, invest in economic development
through our local chambers of commerce and teach financial education through our Learn for Life program. Additionally, we
provide volunteer and financial support to a variety of organizations that work tirelessly to serve the most vulnerable citizens
in our community by meeting their basic needs and addressing issues such as poverty, hunger, healthcare and safety.
FOUR PILLARS OF GIVING
Basic Needs
Economic
Development
Education
United Way
OUR PHILANTHROPY BY THE NUMBERS
$5.1 MILLION
Total contributions
692
Nonprofits
received funding
711
Nonprofit leadership positions
filled by 384 employees
5,263
Children taught by our
financial literacy program,
Learn for Life
$2.2 MILLION
Employee contributions
to United Way
$940,000
Corporate contributions
to United Way
“The underpinning of BOK Financial has always been one of the commitment to our communities, our
customers, and each other. Our employees learn early in their careers that community involvement is core
to the DNA of our company, and that the leaders in our company have embraced this commitment.”
Steven G. Bradshaw
President and CEO, BOK Financial
Dear Shareholders,
2017 was a terrific year for BOK
Financial, its employees, and its
shareholders. Total revenue was a
record $1.66 billion1; net income
attributable to BOK Financial
shareholders was $334.6 million, up 44
percent compared to 2016; and we
reported diluted earnings per share of
$5.11, the second-highest level in our
company’s history.
This strong performance was the result
of several factors, not the least of
which was the hard work and sacrifice
of every single one of our employees.
They really rose to the occasion in an
intensely-competitive environment,
helping to differentiate BOK Financial with
its customers, prospects, and communities.
More on this later in my letter.
In 2017, we generated very strong
growth in net interest income, which
was up 12.6 percent compared to 2016.
We have always positioned the bank to
be relatively neutral to movements in
interest rates, with the overarching
strategic view that the way to build
shareholder value is to make good loans,
build fee businesses, and carefully
manage costs; and that trying to time
rate movements is a difficult, and
potentially costly proposition. This
strategy was borne out over the last
several years as we remained fully
invested, generating substantial net
interest income for our shareholders.
That said, thus far in the cycle our
balance sheet has behaved more asset
sensitive than we would have otherwise
modeled as deposit pricing across the
banking industry has remained
disciplined.
Going forward, holding deposit costs at
competitive levels while still growing
balances will be a challenging objective
for all of us in the banking industry,
including BOK Financial. But this will be
essential as we continue to work back to
pre-Great Recession margin levels as an
industry. Additional Federal Reserve rate
hikes that are anticipated in 2018 will be
helpful in this regard.
Another major driver of our strong
2017 financial performance was
expense discipline. One of our core
goals every year is to drive earnings
leverage by holding expense growth to
no more than half of revenue growth.
We were successful in this regard in
2017, as expenses were increased only
modestly from the prior year despite the
significant increase in revenue. Our
future success will demand that we
continue this discipline.
The credit environment remains stable,
and accordingly, we reversed $7 million
of loan loss reserves in 2017. At year
end, we believe we were appropriately
reserved for potential losses in the
portfolio, and barring an unforeseen
negative turn in credit quality we will
likely see additional reversals of
loan loss provision, at least through
early 2018.
Our strong credit quality is
attributable to the fact that we are
disciplined credit underwriters. This
is core to our strategy of building our
bank to outperform peers across the full
economic cycle, and is largely
manifested in our modest concentration
in commercial real estate relative to
peers. Although we are active nationally
in commercial real estate, we are very
selective in terms of our clients and we
do not chase growth. Our lower CRE
concentration relative to peers is
balanced with our higher concentration
in energy lending, and again, this is
strategic: while these are both cyclical
businesses that go through downturns
from time to time, the low loss severity
in energy during industry troughs is
evidenced by the modest losses we
experienced during the energy downturn
of 2014–2016. At the same time, energy
customers tend to be some of our most
complete relationships as they are heavy
users of ancillary services such as
treasury management, private banking
and wealth management, 401(k)
services, acquisition and divestiture
advisory services, and agented credit
facilities, among others.
Our differentiated wealth
management business was another
major contributor to the strong
2017 financial results. Wealth
management grew revenue 11.4 percent
and earnings 46.1 percent during the
year. In addition, loans were up 16.0
percent, deposits were up 13.3 percent,
and assets under management and
administration topped $80 billion for the
first time in company history.
This is a business we have been steadily
growing and building. We have the scale,
product depth, and professional team to
capitalize on one of the most significant
demographic trends that will impact our
industry in the coming decades: the
transition of over $3 trillion of wealth
from Baby Boomers to their heirs.
Wealth management continues to
find innovative ways to fuel growth.
In 2016 we strategically hired a team of
advisors from a New England-based
brokerage firm that specialized in
providing services to investors in
mortgage backed securities. Through
this team, we were able to introduce
new products that led to deeper
relationships with our customers in the
1 Defined as interest revenue plus total fees and commissions
mortgage industry and the contribution
of $9 million of incremental wealth
management revenue in 2017.
Loan growth was muted this year, and
we know we need to re-energize
growth here to meet our financial
objectives. We believe the 2018
economic environment will be more
conducive to loan growth. First,
economic growth and employment
seemed to be accelerating in the
second half of 2017. In addition, we
believe many of our commercial and
industrial clients put projects on hold in
2017 as they waited for clarity on tax
reform and what it might mean for
capital spending. Now that tax reform
has passed, this headwind should
subside. Finally, the potential for
healthcare reform stalled growth in our
senior housing business early in the
year, and this too is behind us now.
Fee and commission revenue was
down slightly as higher interest rates
caused refinancing volume and
gain-on-sale margins to decrease
materially in our mortgage business.
However, our fee businesses are
diverse, and this decrease was mostly
offset by the aforementioned strength
in wealth management and continued
growth in transaction processing.
We believe we can accelerate fee
income growth in 2018 as wealth
management continues its momentum,
and transaction processing continues
to benefit from continued growth in
electronic transaction volume.
Looking Forward
We are enthusiastic about the potential
for Dodd-Frank reform, specifically the
proposal to move the threshold for the
so-called “SIFI Limit” (Systemically
Important Financial Institutions) to
$250 billion from its current $50 billion.
The SIFI limit has significantly impacted
how we think about growth strategies.
In fact last year, when it appeared that
legislative discussion about moving the
SIFI limit had stalled, we conducted a
detailed analysis to determine the cost
of crossing the $50 billion threshold.
We viewed that cost as prohibitive
and it impacted our desire to pursue
growth through larger scale
acquisitions.
If the limit is moved higher as
proposed, we have the opportunity
to pursue larger in-footprint acquisition
targets so that we can add much
needed scale to spread risk
management and technology
infrastructure spend over a larger base.
As we noted in our investor
communications throughout 2017,
we expect to increase spending on
information technology projects in
2018. New leadership in information
technology has helped our team
identify areas of investment that will
pay significant dividends in our
business as we look to surpass our
competition in several important areas.
One area where we intend to invest in
2018 is data analytics, as better
leveraging of our digital assets can
lead to significant benefits in how we
run the business. For example, in
credit risk management we have
decades of data on how various loan
types perform across the economic
cycle. Viewed through the lens of data
analytics, this information can help
supplement the intellectual property
already housed in the minds of our
credit analysis team. This in turn will
help us identify the types of borrowers,
loan structures, and industries where
we can grow without unacceptably
increasing risk to the bank.
In business resiliency, the natural
disaster events of 2017 provided a
great collective learning experience for
the company. Although we recovered
from the August 2017 tornado that hit
our operations center within hours, and
Hurricane Harvey ultimately proved to
be largely a non-event for our company,
both events identified areas of
improvement. We expect to look more
closely at cloud-based solutions in
2018 for that reason, which is a change
from our historic preference to have all
key systems housed within our own
data center.
Changing consumer preferences that
impact several business units also will
require ongoing IT investment. We are
ramping up our capabilities in the
growing self-service or DIY channels,
which reduce traditional cost of delivery
over time, and exploring automation
and robotics for transaction execution.
We also continue to scour the
company to eliminate unnecessary
cost with the goal of improving our
efficiency ratio. An internal program
conducted across the company
identified more than $1.4 million in
run-rate expense reductions in 2017,
and we expect to identify another $2
million or more in 2018. This will
complement the granular expense
review process we now have in
place as we strive to reduce our
efficiency ratio to 60 percent in the
next three years.
donated more than $2.2 million to our
various United Way campaigns in 2017.
Their charitable spirit is matched by the
company, which granted more than
$5.1 million to charitable causes
through the BOKF Foundation.
Accordingly, BOK Financial was
recognized by the Association of
Fundraising Professionals, a national
umbrella organization for philanthropy,
as a 2017 Outstanding Philanthropist.
I’m proud of each and every one of my
BOK Financial teammates. They are
outstanding ambassadors for BOK
Financial, whether they are meeting the
needs of customers with the highest
ethical standards; giving their time, talent,
and resources to our communities; or
donning hip waders and slogging
through flood water to help a fellow
employee rebuild their home in the wake
of a hurricane. It’s the spirit and character
of BOK Financial’s employees that made
our strong 2017 financial results possible;
this gives us much as to build on in 2018.
Best regards,
Steven G. Bradshaw
President and Chief Executive Officer
The Spirit and
Character of Our
Employees
Although 2017 was a great year
financially for the company, two
non-financial accomplishments
highlight what I am most proud of
this year.
Hurricane Harvey had a dramatic
impact on our nearly 300 employees in
Houston. Many of them were personally
impacted and displaced from homes;
some even had to be evacuated by
boat. As the disaster unfolded on the
news, I got the same question over and
over from employees across the
footprint: How can I help?
We quickly reacted and worked with a
local non-profit to form an employee
relief fund to assist impacted employees
in the rebuilding effort.
All employees were able to contribute,
with total contributions matched by the
company. The outpouring was
overwhelming: 597 employees
contributed nearly $90,000, enabling us
to provide meaningful assistance to
those in need.
The weekend following the storm, I
learned that BOK Financial teammates
were showing up at the homes of their
fellow employees to help with the even
harder part of the rebuilding effort:
tearing out and disposing of damaged
drywall and carpet, mopping out
flooded rooms, and hauling refuse to
the dump.
The collective effort of all employees in
this regard was without question my
proudest moment as CEO. It shows the
true spirit and character of our team.
And it’s this spirit and character
that is reflected in BOK Financial
being named one of America’s
most respected banks in a June
2017 survey of customers and
prospects by American Banker
Magazine. In that survey, we scored
highest in all of the areas that a CEO or
shareholder would want his or her
company to demonstrate, including
corporate citizenship, governance,
workplace, ethical behavior and fairness
in the way it conducts business.
It’s no accident that we outperformed in
this regard. The underpinning of BOK
Financial has always been one of
commitment to our communities, our
customers, and each other. This is
reflective of the philanthropic priorities
of our chairman, George Kaiser, who
was one of the original signers of The
Giving Pledge, a commitment by the
world’s wealthiest individuals and
families to dedicate the majority of their
wealth to giving back2. Our employees
learn early in their careers that
community involvement is core to the
DNA of our company, and that the
leaders in our company have embraced
this commitment.
And they respond wholeheartedly.
In 2017, BOK Financial employees
volunteered more than 20,000 hours
to local non-profit entities, and 384 of
them serve on 551 leadership boards
and set tone, direction, and strategy
for these organizations. Employees
2 For more information see www.givingpledge.org.
Photo courtesy of TulsaPeople Magazine.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2017
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____________ to ______________
Commission File No. 0-19341
BOK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Oklahoma
(State or other jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
Bank of Oklahoma Tower
Boston Avenue at Second Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
73-1373454
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
74172
(Zip Code)
(918) 588-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
Common stock, $0.00006 par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act. Yes
No
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
No
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data
File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of “larger accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
No
The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock ("Common Stock") held by non-affiliates is approximately $2.1 billion (based
on the June 30, 2017 closing price of Common Stock of $84.13 per share). As of January 31, 2018, there were 65,550,406 shares of Common
Stock outstanding.
Part III incorporates certain information by reference from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
BOK Financial Corporation
Form 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Index
Part I
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
Part II
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 1
Item 1A
Item 1B
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
Item 5
Item 6
Item 7
Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
1
9
14
14
14
14
15
18
18
74
80
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 168
167
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Part III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Item 8
Item 9
Item 9A
Item 9B
Item 10
Item 11
Item 12
Item 13
Item 14
167
167
167
168
168
168
168
171
Part IV
Item 15
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
Exhibit 21
Exhibit 23
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Exhibit 31.1
Chief Executive Officer Section 302 Certification
Exhibit 31.2
Chief Financial Officer Section 302 Certification
Exhibit 32
Section 906 Certifications
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
PART I
General
Developments relating to individual aspects of the business of BOK Financial Corporation ("BOK Financial" or "the
Company") are described below. Additional discussion of the Company’s activities during the current year appears within Item
7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Description of Business
BOK Financial is a financial holding company incorporated in the state of Oklahoma in 1990 whose activities are governed by
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 ("BHCA"), as amended by the Financial Services Modernization Act or Gramm-
Leach-Bliley Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"). BOK
Financial offers full service banking in Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Northwest Arkansas, Colorado, Arizona, and Kansas/
Missouri. At December 31, 2017, the Company reported total consolidated assets of $32 billion and ranked as the 56th largest
bank holding company based on asset size.
BOKF, NA ("the Bank") is a wholly owned subsidiary bank of BOK Financial. The Bank operates TransFund, Cavanal Hill
Investment Management, BOK Financial Asset Management, Inc. and seven banking divisions: Bank of Albuquerque, Bank of
Arizona, Bank of Arkansas, Mobank, Bank of Oklahoma, Bank of Texas and Colorado State Bank and Trust. Other wholly
owned subsidiaries of BOK Financial include BOK Financial Securities, Inc., a broker/dealer that primarily engages in retail
and institutional securities sales and municipal bond underwriting and The Milestone Group, Inc., an investment adviser to high
net worth clients. Other non-bank subsidiary operations do not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Our overall strategic objective is to emphasize growth in long-term value by building on our leadership position in Oklahoma
through expansion into other high-growth markets in contiguous states. We operate primarily in the metropolitan areas of Tulsa
and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Dallas, Fort Worth and Houston, Texas; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Denver, Colorado;
Phoenix, Arizona, and Kansas City, Kansas/Missouri. Our acquisition strategy targets fairly priced quality organizations with
demonstrated solid growth that would supplement our principal lines of business. We provide additional growth opportunities
by hiring talent to enhance competitiveness, adding locations and broadening product offerings. Our operating philosophy
embraces local decision-making in each of our geographic markets while adhering to common Company standards.
Our primary focus is to provide a comprehensive range of nationally competitive financial products and services in a
personalized and responsive manner. Products and services include loans and deposits, cash management services, fiduciary
services, mortgage banking and brokerage and trading services to middle-market businesses, financial institutions and
consumers. Commercial banking represents a significant part of our business. Our credit culture emphasizes building
relationships by making high quality loans and providing a full range of financial products and services to our customers. We
offer derivative products that enable mortgage banking customers to manage their production risks and our energy financing
expertise enables us to offer commodity derivatives for customers to use in their risk management. Our diversified base of
revenue sources is designed to generate returns in a range of economic situations. Historically, fees and commissions provide
45% to 48% of our total revenue. Approximately 45% of our revenue came from fees and commissions in 2017.
BOK Financial’s corporate headquarters is located at Bank of Oklahoma Tower, Boston Avenue at Second Street, Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74172.
The Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to those reports are available on the Company’s website at www.bokf.com as soon as reasonably practicable after
the Company electronically files such material with or furnishes it to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
1
Operating Segments
BOK Financial operates three principal lines of business: Commercial Banking, Consumer Banking and Wealth
Management. Commercial Banking includes lending, treasury and cash management services and customer risk management
products for small businesses, middle market and larger commercial customers. Commercial Banking also includes the
TransFund electronic funds network. Consumer Banking includes retail lending and deposit services, lending and deposit
services to small business customers served through the retail branch network and all mortgage banking activities. Wealth
Management provides fiduciary services, private bank services and investment advisory services in all markets. Wealth
Management also underwrites state and municipal securities and engages in brokerage and trading activities. Discussion of
these principal lines of business appears within the Lines of Business section of "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations".
Competition
BOK Financial and its operating segments face competition from other banks, thrifts, credit unions and other non-bank
financial institutions, such as investment banking firms, investment advisory firms, brokerage firms, investment companies,
financial technology firms, government agencies, mortgage brokers and insurance companies. The Company competes largely
on the basis of customer services, interest rates on loans and deposits, lending limits and customer convenience. Some
operating segments face competition from institutions that are not as closely regulated as banks, and therefore are not limited
by the same capital requirements and other restrictions. All market share information presented below is based upon share of
deposits in specified areas according to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") as of June 30, 2017.
We are the largest financial institution in the state of Oklahoma with 14% of the state’s total deposits. Bank of Oklahoma has
30% and 12% of the market share in the Tulsa and Oklahoma City areas, respectively. We compete with two banks that have
operations nationwide and have greater access to funds at lower costs, higher lending limits, and greater access to technology
resources. We also compete with regional and locally-owned banks in both the Tulsa and Oklahoma City areas, as well as in
every other community in which we do business throughout the state.
Bank of Texas competes against numerous financial institutions, including some of the largest in the United States, and has a
market share of approximately 2% in the Dallas, Fort Worth area and less than 1% in the Houston area. Bank of Albuquerque
has a 10% market share in the Albuquerque area and competes with four large national banks, some regional banks and several
locally-owned smaller community banks. Colorado State Bank and Trust has a market share of approximately 2% in the Denver
area. Bank of Arkansas serves Benton and Washington counties in Arkansas with a market share of approximately 2%. Mobank
has a market share of approximately 2% in the Kansas City, Missouri/Kansas area. Bank of Arizona operates as a community
bank with locations in Phoenix, Mesa and Scottsdale with less than 1% market share. The Company’s ability to expand into
additional states remains subject to various federal and state laws.
Employees
As of December 31, 2017, BOK Financial and its subsidiaries employed 4,930 full-time equivalent employees. None of the
Company’s employees are represented by collective bargaining agreements. Management considers its employee relations to be
good.
Supervision and Regulation
BOK Financial and its subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulations under federal and state laws. Both the scope of the laws
and regulations and the intensity of the supervision to which our business is subject have increased in recent years. Regulatory
enforcement and fines have also increased across the banking and financial services sector. Many of these changes have
occurred as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations, most of which are now in place. These regulations
and others are designed to promote safety and soundness, protect consumers and ensure the stability of the banking system as a
whole. The purpose of these regulations is not necessarily to protect shareholders and creditors. As detailed below, these
regulations require the Company and its subsidiaries to maintain certain capital balances and require the Company to provide
financial support to its subsidiaries. These regulations may restrict the Company’s ability to diversify, to acquire other
institutions and to pay dividends on its capital stock. These regulations also include requirements on certain programs and
services offered to our customers, including restrictions on fees charged for certain services. President Trump has issued an
executive order that sets forth principles for reform of the federal financial regulatory framework, and the Republican majority
in Congress has also suggested an agenda for financial regulatory change. It is too early to assess whether there will be any
major changes in the regulatory environment or merely a rebalancing of the post financial crisis framework. The Company
expects that its business will remain subject to extensive regulation and supervision.
2
The following information summarizes certain existing laws and regulations that affect the Company’s operations. It does not
summarize all provisions of these laws and regulations and does not include all laws and regulations that affect the Company
presently or in the future.
General
As a financial holding company, BOK Financial is regulated under the BHCA and is subject to regular inspection, examination
and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve Board"). Under the BHCA,
BOK Financial files quarterly reports and other information with the Federal Reserve Board.
BOKF, NA is organized as a national banking association under the National Banking Act, and is subject to regulation,
supervision and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC"), the FDIC, the Federal Reserve
Board, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") and other federal and state regulatory agencies. The OCC has
primary supervisory responsibility for national banks and must approve certain corporate or structural changes, including
changes in capitalization, payment of dividends, change of place of business, and establishment of a branch or operating
subsidiary. The OCC performs examinations concerning safety and soundness, the quality of management and directors,
information technology and compliance with applicable regulations. The National Banking Act authorizes the OCC to examine
every national bank as often as necessary.
A financial holding company, and the companies under its control, are permitted to engage in activities considered "financial in
nature" as defined by the BHCA, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and Federal Reserve Board interpretations. Activities that are
"financial in nature" include securities underwriting and dealing, insurance underwriting, merchant banking, operating a
mortgage company, performing certain data processing operations, servicing loans and other extensions of credit, providing
investment and financial advice, owning and operating savings and loan associations, and leasing personal property on a full
pay-out, non-operating basis. A financial holding company is required to notify the Federal Reserve Board within thirty days of
engaging in new activities determined to be "financial in nature." BOK Financial is engaged in some of these activities and has
notified the Federal Reserve Board.
In order for a financial holding company to commence any new activity permitted by the BHCA, each insured depository
institution subsidiary of the financial holding company must be "well capitalized" and "well managed" and have received a
rating of at least "satisfactory" in its most recent examination under the Community Reinvestment Act. A financial holding
company and its depository institution subsidiaries are considered to be "well capitalized" if they meet the requirements
discussed in the section captioned "Capital Adequacy and Prompt Corrective Action" which follows. A financial holding
company and its depository institution subsidiaries are considered to be "well managed" if they receive a composite rating and
management rating of at least "satisfactory" in their most recent examinations. If a financial holding company fails to meet
these requirements, the Federal Reserve Board may impose limitations or conditions on the conduct of its activities and the
company may not commence any new financial activities without prior approval.
The BHCA requires the Federal Reserve Board’s prior approval for the direct or indirect acquisition of more than five percent
of any class of voting stock of any non-affiliated bank. Under the Federal Bank Merger Act, the prior approval of the OCC is
required for a national bank to merge with another bank or purchase the assets or assume the deposits of another bank. In
reviewing applications seeking approval of merger and acquisition transactions, the bank regulatory authorities consider,
among other things, the competitive effect and public benefits of the transactions, the capital position of the combined
organization, the applicant’s performance record under the Community Reinvestment Act and fair housing laws and the
effectiveness of the subject organizations in combating money laundering activities.
A financial holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited under the BHCA from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements
in connection with the provision of any credit, property or services. Thus, a subsidiary of a financial holding company may not
extend credit, lease or sell property, furnish any services or fix or vary the consideration for these activities on the condition
that (1) the customer obtain or provide additional credit, property or services from or to the financial holding company or any
subsidiary thereof, or (2) the customer may not obtain some other credit, property or services from a competitor, except to the
extent reasonable conditions are imposed to insure the soundness of credit extended.
The Bank and other non-bank subsidiaries are also subject to other federal and state laws and regulations. For example, BOK
Financial Securities, Inc. is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority ("FINRA"), the Federal Reserve Board, and state securities regulators. Such regulations generally include licensing
of certain personnel, customer interactions, and trading operations.
3
Interchange Fees
The Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act required that interchange fees on electronic debit transactions paid by
merchants must be "reasonable and proportional to the cost incurred by the issuer" and prohibited card network rules that have
limited price competition among networks. Federal Reserve rules applicable to financial institutions that have assets of $10
billion or more provide that the maximum permissible interchange fee for an electronic debit transaction is the sum of 21 cents
per transaction and 5 basis points multiplied by the value of the transaction. An upward adjustment of no more than 1 cent to an
issuer's debit card interchange fee is allowed if the card issuer develops and implements policies and procedures reasonably
designed to achieve certain fraud prevention standards. The Durbin Amendment also required all banks to comply with the
prohibition on network exclusivity and routing requirements. Debit card issuers are required to make at least two unaffiliated
networks available to merchants.
Volcker and Swap Rules
Title VI of the Dodd-Frank Act, commonly known as the Volcker Rule, prohibits the Company from (1) engaging in short-term
proprietary trading for our own account, and (2) having certain ownership interests in or relationships with private equity or
hedge funds. The fundamental prohibitions of the Volcker Rule apply to banking entities of any size, including the Company
and its bank subsidiary. The final Volcker Rule regulations contain exemptions to the statutory prohibitions for market-making,
hedging, underwriting, trading in U.S. government and agency obligations and also permit certain ownership interests in certain
types of funds to be retained. They also permit the offering and sponsoring of funds under certain conditions. The final Volcker
Rule regulations impose compliance and reporting obligations on banking entities and their covered activities. The Company
has implemented a compliance program required by the Volcker Rule and has either divested or received an extension for
holdings in certain legacy “illiquid funds.” The Company’s trading activity remains largely unaffected by the Volcker Rule as
most of our trading activity is exempted or excluded from the proprietary trading prohibitions.
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act, commonly known as the Swap Rule, subjects nearly all derivative transactions to the
regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") or SEC. This includes registration, recordkeeping,
reporting, capital, margin and business conduct requirements on swap dealers and major swap participants. The CFTC and
SEC both approved interim final rules on the definition "swap" and "swap dealer" which were effective October 2012. Under
CFTC and SEC rules, entities transacting in less than $8 billion in notional value of swaps over any 12 month period during
the phase-in period are exempt from the definition of and registration as a "swap dealer." In October 2017, the CFTC extended
the phase-in period termination date by one year from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Barring any further action
by the CFTC, the $8 billion threshold will be reduced to $3 billion at the end of 2019 when the phase-in period terminates.
The Company currently estimates that the nature and volume of its swaps activity will not require it to register as a swap
dealer any time prior to the phase-in period termination date.
Enhanced Prudential Standards
The Dodd-Frank Act directed the Federal Reserve Board to monitor emerging risks to financial institutions and enacted
enhanced supervision and prudential standards applicable to bank holding companies with consolidated assets of $50 billion
or more and non-bank covered companies designated as systematically important to the Financial Stability Oversight
Council (often referred to as systemically important financial institutions). The Dodd-Frank Act mandates that certain
regulatory requirements applicable to systemically important financial institutions be more stringent than those applicable to
other financial institutions.
In February 2014, the Federal Reserve Board adopted rules to implement certain of these enhanced prudential standards.
Beginning in 2015, the rules required publicly traded bank holding companies with $10 billion or more in total consolidated
assets to establish risk committees and required bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets
to comply with enhanced liquidity and overall risk management standards. The Company has had a separate Risk Committee
since 2013 and is in compliance with applicable requirements.
We monitor developments with respect to the enhanced prudential standards because of application to our Company if our
total consolidated assets reach $50 billion or more.
4
Consumer Financial Protection
We are subject to a number of federal and state consumer protection laws that extensively govern our relationship with our
customers. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the
Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act,
the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Service Members
Civil Relief Act and these laws’ respective state-law counterparts, as well as state usury laws and laws regarding unfair and
deceptive acts and practices. These and other federal laws, among other things, require disclosures of the cost of credit and terms
of deposit accounts, provide substantive consumer rights, prohibit discrimination in credit transactions, regulate the use of credit
report information, provide financial privacy protections, prohibit unfair, deceptive and abusive practices, restrict our ability to
raise interest rates and subject us to substantial regulatory oversight. Violations of applicable consumer protection laws can result
in significant potential liability from litigation brought by customers, including actual damages, restitution and attorneys’ fees.
Federal bank regulators, state attorneys general and state and local consumer protection agencies may also seek to enforce consumer
protection requirements and obtain these and other remedies, including regulatory sanctions, customer rescission rights, action by
the state and local attorneys general in each jurisdiction in which we operate and civil money penalties. Failure to comply with
consumer protection requirements may also damage our reputation and result in our failure to obtain any required bank regulatory
approval for merger or acquisition transactions we may wish to pursue or our prohibition from engaging in such transactions even
if approval is not required.
The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer financial laws that apply to all banks, including, among
other things, the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. Abusive acts or practices are defined as
those that materially interfere with a consumer’s ability to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or
service or take unreasonable advantage of a consumer’s (i) lack of financial savvy, (ii) inability to protect himself in the selection
or use of consumer financial products or services, or (iii) reasonable reliance on a covered entity to act in the consumer’s interests.
The CFPB can issue cease-and-desist orders against banks and other entities that violate consumer financial laws. The CFPB may
also institute a civil action against an entity in violation of federal consumer financial law in order to impose a civil penalty or
injunction.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 ("CRA") requires depository institutions to assist in meeting the credit needs of their
market areas consistent with safe and sound banking practice. Under the CRA, each depository institution is required to help meet
the credit needs of its market areas by, among other things, providing credit to low- and moderate-income individuals and
communities. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance with the CRA and are assigned ratings. In order
for a financial holding company to commence any new activity permitted by the BHC Act, or to acquire any company engaged
in any new activity permitted by the BHC Act, each insured depository institution subsidiary of the financial holding company
must have received a rating of at least “satisfactory” in its most recent examination under the CRA. Furthermore, banking regulators
take into account CRA ratings when considering a request for an approval of a proposed transaction. The Bank received a rating
of "outstanding" in its most recent CRA examination, which is above "satisfactory."
Financial Privacy
The federal banking regulators adopted rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-
public information about consumers to non-affiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to
consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a non-
affiliated third party. These regulations affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies
and is conveyed to outside parties.
Capital Adequacy and Prompt Corrective Action
The Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC have issued substantially similar risk-based and leverage capital guidelines
applicable to United States banking organizations to ensure capital adequacy based upon the risk levels of assets and off-
balance sheet financial instruments. In addition, these regulatory agencies may from time to time require that a banking
organization maintain capital above the minimum levels, whether because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated
growth. Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and
classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators regarding components, risk weighting and other factors.
5
Federal Reserve Board risk-based guidelines define a four-tier capital framework based on three categories of regulatory
capital. Common equity Tier 1 capital ("CET1") includes common shareholders' equity, less goodwill, most intangible assets
and other adjustments. Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 capital plus certain additional capital instruments and related surplus.
Supplementary capital ("Tier 2") consists of preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 capital, qualifying mandatory convertible
debt securities, limited amounts of subordinated debt, other qualifying term debt and allowances for credit losses, subject to
limitations. Assets and off-balance sheet exposures are assigned to categories of risk-weights, based primarily upon relative
credit risk. Risk-based capital ratios are calculated by dividing CET1, Tier 1 and total capital by risk-weighted assets.
New capital rules were effective for banks and bank holding companies, including BOK Financial on January 1, 2015 as part of
a package of regulatory reforms developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ("BCBS") to strengthen the
regulation, supervision and risk management of the banking sector, commonly referred to as the Basel III framework.
Components of these rules will phase in through January 1, 2019, with certain exceptions. The new capital rules established a
7% threshold for the common equity Tier 1 ratio consisting of a minimum level plus a capital conservation buffer. The rules
also changed both the Tier 1 risk based capital requirements and the total risk based requirements to a minimum of 6% and 8%,
respectively, plus a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% totaling 8.5% and 10.5%, respectively. The Company elected to exclude
unrealized gains and losses from available for sale securities from its calculation of Tier 1 capital, consistent with the treatment
under previous capital rules.
The leverage ratio is determined by dividing Tier 1 capital by adjusted average total assets. Banking organizations are required
to maintain a ratio of at least 4%. A bank which falls below these levels, including the capital conservation buffer, would be
subject to regulatory restrictions on capital distributions (including but not limited to dividends and share repurchases) and
executive bonus payments.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (the "FDICIA"), among other things, identifies five
capital categories for insured depository institutions from well capitalized to critically under-capitalized and requires the
respective federal regulatory agencies to implement systems for prompt corrective action for institutions failing to meet
minimum capital requirements within such categories. FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive covenants on operations,
management and capital distributions, depending upon the category in which an institution is classified. The various regulatory
agencies have adopted substantially similar regulations that define the five capital categories identified by FDICIA, using the
total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital and leverage capital ratios as the relevant capital measures. Such regulations
establish various degrees of corrective action to be taken when an institution is considered under-capitalized.
Liquidity Requirements
The Basel III framework also requires bank holding companies and banks to measure their liquidity against specific liquidity
tests. One test, referred to as the liquidity coverage ratio, is designed to ensure that the banking entity maintains a prescribed
minimum level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets equal to expected net cash outflows as defined. The other test,
referred to as the net stable funding ratio, is designed to promote greater reliance on medium and long term funding sources.
On September 3, 2014, U.S. federal banking agencies published the final rule covering Liquidity Risk Management Standards
that would standardize minimum liquidity requirements for internationally active banking organizations as defined (generally
those with total consolidated assets in excess of $250 billion) as well as modified liquidity requirements for other banking
organizations with total consolidated assets in excess of $50 billion that are not internationally active. Although the final rule
does not apply to banking organizations with total assets less than $50 billion, including the Company, if growth in the balance
sheet of the Company were to approach the $50 billion threshold, the costs of such liquidity regulations would begin to be
realized.
Stress Testing
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve published regulations that require bank holding companies with $10
billion to $50 billion in assets to perform annual capital stress tests. The requirements for annual capital stress testing became
effective for the Company in the fourth quarter of 2013. The Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test ("DFAST") is a forward-looking
exercise under which the Company and its banking subsidiary estimate the impact of a hypothetical severely adverse
macroeconomic scenario provided by the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on its financial
condition and regulatory capital ratios over a nine-quarter time horizon. Under the scenario provided by the regulatory agencies
for the Company's most recently completed stress test, all capital ratio measures remain above the minimum regulatory
thresholds. Additional information concerning the annual stress test may be found on the Company's Investor Relations page at
www.bokf.com under the "Presentations" tab. The results of future capital stress tests may place constraints on capital
distributions or increases in required regulatory capital under certain circumstances.
6
Further discussion of regulatory capital, including regulatory capital amounts and ratios, is set forth under the heading
"Liquidity and Capital" within "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and
in Note 15 of the Company's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, both of which appear elsewhere herein.
Executive and Incentive Compensation
Guidelines adopted by federal banking agencies prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and
describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by
an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder. The Federal Reserve Board has issued comprehensive
guidance on incentive compensation intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies do not undermine safety and
soundness by encouraging excessive risk taking. This guidance covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect
the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, based on key principles that (i) incentives do not
encourage risk-taking beyond the organization's ability to identify and manage risk, (ii) compensation arrangements are
compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) compensation arrangements are supported by strong
corporate governance, including active and effective board oversight. Deficiencies in compensation practices may affect
supervisory ratings and enforcement actions may be taken if incentive compensation arrangements pose a risk to safety and
soundness.
Deposit Insurance
Substantially all of the deposits held by the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund ("DIF") of
the FDIC and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. In 2011, the FDIC released a final rule to
implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that affect deposit insurance assessments. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank
Act raised the minimum designated reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits, removed the upper limit
of the designated reserve ratio, required that the designated reserve ratio reach 1.35% by September 30, 2020, and required that
the FDIC offset the effect of increasing the minimum designated reserve ratio on depository institutions with total assets of less
than $10 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act provided the FDIC flexibility in implementation of the increase in the designated reserve
ratio, but it will ultimately result in increased deposit insurance costs to the Company. The Dodd-Frank Act also required that
the FDIC redefine the assessment base to average consolidated assets minus average tangible equity.
On June 30, 2016, the DIF rose above the 1.15%, resulting in a reduction of the initial assessment rate for all banks and
implementing a 4.5% surcharge on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more. The
assessment base for the surcharge will be the regular assessment base reduced by $10 billion. If the DIF reserve ratio does not
reach 1.35% by December 31, 2018, the FDIC will impose a shortfall assessment on banks with total consolidated assets of $10
billion or more in the first quarter of 2019.
Dividends
A key source of liquidity for BOK Financial is dividends from BOKF, NA, which is limited by various banking regulations to
net profits, as defined, for the year plus retained profits for the preceding two years. Dividends are further restricted by
minimum capital requirements and the Company's internal capital policy. BOKF, NA's dividend limitations are discussed under
the heading "Liquidity and Capital" within "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations."
Source of Strength Doctrine
According to Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to each
subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support each such subsidiary. This support may be required at times when a bank
holding company may not be able to provide such support.
Transactions with Affiliates
The Federal Reserve Board regulates transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries. Generally, the Federal Reserve
Act and Regulation W, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, limit the Company’s banking subsidiary and its subsidiaries, to
lending and other "covered transactions" with affiliates. The aggregate amount of covered transactions a banking subsidiary or
its subsidiaries may enter into with an affiliate may not exceed 10% of the capital stock and surplus of the banking subsidiary.
The aggregate amount of covered transactions with all affiliates may not exceed 20% of the capital stock and surplus of the
banking subsidiary.
7
Covered transactions with affiliates are also subject to collateral requirements and must be conducted on arm’s length
terms. Covered transactions include (a) a loan or extension of credit by the banking subsidiary, including derivative contracts,
(b) a purchase of securities issued to a banking subsidiary, (c) a purchase of assets by the banking subsidiary unless otherwise
exempted by the Federal Reserve, (d) acceptance of securities issued by an affiliate to the banking subsidiary as collateral for a
loan, and (e) the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit by the banking subsidiary on behalf of an affiliate.
Bank Secrecy Act and USA PATRIOT Act
The Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA") and The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 ("PATRIOT Act") imposes many requirements on
financial institutions in the interest of national security and law enforcement. BSA requires banks to maintain records and file
suspicious activity reports that are of use to law enforcement and regulators in combating money laundering and other financial
crimes. The PATRIOT Act is intended to deny terrorists and criminals the ability to access the U.S. financial services system
and places significantly greater requirements on financial institutions. Financial institutions, such as the Company and its
subsidiaries, must have a designated BSA Officer, internal controls, independent testing and training programs commensurate
with their size and risk profile. As part of its internal control program, a financial institution is expected to have effective
customer due diligence and enhanced due diligence requirements for high-risk customers, as well as processes to prohibit
transactions with entities subject to Office of Foreign Asset Control sanctions. Documentation and recordkeeping requirements,
as well as system requirements, aimed at identifying and reporting suspicious activity reporting, must increase with the
institution's size and complexity. Failure to implement or maintain adequate programs and controls to combat terrorist financing
and money laundering may have serious legal, financial, and reputational consequences.
Governmental Policies and Economic Factors
The operations of BOK Financial and its subsidiaries are affected by legislative changes and by the policies of various
regulatory authorities and, in particular, the policies of the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board has statutory
objectives to maximize employment and maintain price stability. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the
Federal Reserve Board to implement these objectives are: open-market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in
the discount rate and federal funds rate on bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements on bank deposits. The effect
of future changes in such policies on the business and earnings of BOK Financial and its subsidiaries is uncertain.
In response to the significant recession in business activity which began in 2007, the Federal Reserve took aggressive actions to
reduce interest rates and provide liquidity. While many of the crisis-related programs have expired or been closed, government
legislation and policies continue to be accommodative, including increases in government spending, reduction of certain taxes
and promotion of affordable home programs.
The Federal Reserve completed its bond purchase program designed to reduce longer–term rates in October of 2014 and has
continued to maintain an accommodative policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency
mortgage–backed securities and rolling over maturing Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve announced that, beginning in
October of 2017, it would initiate a balance sheet normalization program that will gradually reduce the the reinvestment of
principal payments from its securities holdings.
As a result of signs of an improving economy, the Federal Reserve increased its target rate by 25 basis points three times during
2017, after an initial 25 basis point increase in December of 2016, the second such increase since the end of 2008. Real gross
domestic product is forecasted to increase at a solid pace during 2018, including consideration of the expected impact of tax
reform. The inflation rate is expected to be close to the Federal Reserve's target of 2%. We expect a continuation of gradual
increases in short term interest rates during 2018 and 2019, as the Federal Reserve has indicated a process of normalization
while promoting sustainable expansion and a rise of inflation to about 2%. The short–term effectiveness and long–term impact
of these programs on the economy in general and on BOK Financial in particular are uncertain.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("the Tax Reform Act"), signed into law on December 22, 2017, will have a broad impact on the
Company and our customers. We believe that the overall impact of lower income tax rates and other provisions of the Tax
Reform Act will be beneficial to future economic growth.
BOK Financial does not engage in operations in foreign countries, nor does it lend to foreign governments.
Foreign Operations
8
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
BOK Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries could be adversely affected by risks and uncertainties that could have a
material impact on its financial condition and results of operations, as well as on its common stock and other financial
instruments. Risk factors which are significant to the Company include, but are not limited to:
General and Regulatory Risk Factors
Adverse factors could impact BOK Financial's ability to implement its operating strategy.
Although BOK Financial has developed an operating strategy, which it expects to result in continuing improved financial
performance, BOK Financial cannot ensure that it will be successful in fulfilling this strategy or that this operating strategy will
be successful. Achieving success is dependent upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond BOK Financial's direct
control. Factors that may adversely affect BOK Financial's ability to implement its operating strategy include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
deterioration of BOK Financial's asset quality;
deterioration in general economic conditions, especially in BOK Financial's core markets;
inability to control BOK Financial's non-interest expenses;
inability to increase non-interest income;
inability to access capital;
decreases in net interest margins;
increases in competition;
adverse regulatory developments.
Substantial competition could adversely affect BOK Financial.
Banking is a competitive business. BOK Financial competes actively for loan, deposit and other financial services business in
the southwest region of the United States. BOK Financial's competitors include a large number of small and large local and
national banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, trust companies, broker-dealers and underwriters, as well as many
financial and non-financial firms that offer services similar to those of BOK Financial. Large national financial institutions
have substantial capital, technology and marketing resources. Such large financial institutions may have greater access to
capital at a lower cost than BOK Financial does, which may adversely affect BOK Financial's ability to compete effectively.
BOK Financial has expanded into markets outside of Oklahoma, where it competes with a large number of financial institutions
that have an established customer base and greater market share than BOK Financial. With respect to some of its services, BOK
Financial competes with non-bank companies that are not subject to regulation. The absence of regulatory requirements may
give non-banks a competitive advantage.
The increasingly competitive environment is in part a result of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product
delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. Our success depends on our
ability to respond to the threats and opportunities of financial technology innovations. Developments in "fintech" and crypto-
currencies have the potential to disrupt the financial industry and change the way banks do business. Investment in new
technology to stay competitive could result in significant costs and increased cybersecurity risk. Our success depends on our
ability to adapt to the pace of the rapidly changing technological environment which is important to retention and acquisitions
of customers.
Government regulations could adversely affect BOK Financial.
BOK Financial and BOKF, NA are subject to banking laws and regulations that limit the type of acquisitions and investments
that we may make. In addition, certain permitted acquisitions and investments are subject to prior review and approval by
banking regulators, including the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC. Banking regulators have broad discretion on whether to
approve proposed acquisitions and investments. In deciding whether to approve a proposed acquisition, federal banking
regulators will consider, among other things, the effect of the acquisition on competition; the convenience and needs of the
communities to be served, including our record of compliance under the Community Reinvestment Act; and our effectiveness
in combating money laundering. They will also consider our financial condition and our future prospects, including projected
capital ratios and levels; the competence, experience, and integrity of our management; and our record of compliance with laws
and regulations.
9
The last several years have seen an increase in regulatory costs borne by the banking industry. Laws, regulations or policies
currently affecting BOK Financial and its subsidiaries may change. The implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act has and will
continue to affect BOK Financial’s businesses, including interchange revenue, mortgage banking, derivative and trading
activities on behalf of customers, consumer products and funds management.
Regulatory authorities may change their interpretation of these statutes and regulations, including the OCC, our primary
regulator, and the CFPB, our regulator for certain designated consumer laws and regulations. Violations of laws and
regulations could limit the growth potential of BOK Financial's businesses. We have made extensive investments in human
and technological resources to address enhanced regulatory expectations, including investments in the areas of risk
management, compliance, and capital planning. Political developments, including the change in administration in the United
States, have added additional uncertainty to the implementation, scope and timing of changes in the regulatory environment
for the banking industry and for the broader economy.
The Tax Reform Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Key provisions that will impact domestic banks include
lowering of the corporate tax rate to 21%, full expensing of qualified assets purchased and placed in service after September
27, 2017, elimination of net operating loss carry-backs, and limitations on the deductibility of FDIC insurance and
compensation expense for certain executive officers. Many provisions of the Tax Reform Act may also impact our customers,
including limitations on deductions by businesses for net interest expense and by individuals for interest on mortgage loans in
excess of $750,000 and elimination of deduction of interest on certain home equity loans. BOKF believes that the overall
impact of the Tax Reform Act should benefit our customers. However, certain provisions could have an adverse impact on our
customers and BOKF’s products, services and revenue.
Political environment could negatively impact BOK Financial’s business.
As a result of the financial crisis and related government intervention to stabilize the banking system, there have been a series
of laws and related regulations proposed or enacted in an attempt to ensure the crisis is not repeated. Many of the new
regulations have been far-reaching. The intervention by the government also impacted populist sentiment with a negative view
of financial institutions. High profile mistakes by the very largest banks in the country have continued to fuel negative
sentiment towards the banking industry. This sentiment may increase litigation risk to the Company or have an adverse impact
on BOK Financial’s future operations. Recent legislative proposals could slow the rate of future increases in regulatory burden
for BOK Financial. However, legislative outcomes and their durability are inherently uncertain.
Credit Risk Factors
Adverse regional economic developments could negatively affect BOK Financial's business.
At December 31, 2017, loans to businesses and individuals with collateral primarily located in Texas represented approximately
34% of the total loan portfolio and loans to businesses and individuals with collateral primarily located in Oklahoma
represented approximately 19% of our total loan portfolio. These geographic concentrations subject the loan portfolio to the
general economic conditions within these areas. Poor economic conditions in Oklahoma, Texas or other markets in the
southwest region may cause BOK Financial to incur losses associated with higher default rates and decreased collateral values
in BOK Financial's loan portfolio. A regional economic downturn could also adversely affect revenue from brokerage and
trading activities, mortgage loan originations and other sources of fee-based revenue.
Extended oil and gas commodity price downturns could negatively affect BOK Financial customers.
At December 31, 2017, 17% of BOK Financial's total loan portfolio is comprised of loans to borrowers in the energy industry.
The energy industry is historically cyclical and prolonged periods of low oil and gas commodity prices could negatively impact
borrowers' ability to pay. In addition, the Company does business in several major oil and natural gas producing states
including Oklahoma, Texas and Colorado. The economies of these states could be negatively impacted by prolonged periods of
low oil and gas commodity prices resulting in increased credit migration to classified and nonaccruing categories, higher loan
loss provisions and risk of credit losses from both energy borrowers and businesses and individuals in those regional
economies.
10
Other adverse economic factors affecting particular industries could have a negative effect on BOK Financial customers
and their ability to make payments to BOK Financial.
Certain industry-specific economic factors also affect BOK Financial. For example, BOK Financial's loan portfolio includes
commercial real estate loans. A downturn in the real estate industry in general or in certain segments of the commercial real
estate industry in the southwest region could also have an adverse effect on BOK Financial's operations. Regulatory changes in
healthcare may negatively affect our customers, which to date primarily has been focused in senior housing. A U.S. House
proposal that provides states more flexibility in using Medicare/Medicaid funds may reduce healthcare reimbursement rates.
Adverse global economic factors could have a negative effect on BOK Financial customers and counterparties.
Economic conditions globally, including those of the European Union and China, could impact BOK Financial’s customers and
counterparties with which we do business. We have no direct exposure to European sovereign debt and our aggregate gross
exposure to European financial institutions totaled $2.9 million at December 31, 2017. Our exposure to Chinese financial
institutions is limited. In addition, we have an aggregate gross exposure to internationally active domestic financial institutions
of approximately $226 million at December 31, 2017 composed of $217 million of cash and securities positions and $9.8
million of gross derivative positions. The financial condition of these institutions is monitored on an on-going basis. We have
not identified any significant customer exposures to European sovereign debt, European financial institutions or Chinese
financial institutions.
Liquidity and Interest Rate Risk Factors
Fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect BOK Financial's business.
BOK Financial's business is highly sensitive to:
•
•
•
the monetary policies implemented by the Federal Reserve Board, including the discount rate on bank borrowings and
changes in reserve requirements, which affect BOK Financial's ability to make loans and the interest rates we may
charge;
changes in prevailing interest rates, due to the dependency of the the Bank on interest income;
open market operations in U.S. Government securities.
A significant increase in market interest rates, or the perception that an increase may occur, could adversely affect both BOK
Financial's ability to originate new loans and BOK Financial's ability to grow. Conversely, a decrease in interest rates could
result in acceleration in the payment of loans, including loans underlying BOK Financial's holdings of residential mortgage-
backed securities and termination of BOK Financial's mortgage servicing rights. In addition, changes in market interest rates,
changes in the relationships between short-term and long-term market interest rates or changes in the relationships between
different interest rate indices, could affect the interest rates charged on interest-earning assets differently than the interest rates
paid on interest-bearing liabilities. This difference could result in an increase in interest expense relative to interest income,
which would reduce the Company’s net interest revenue. In a rising interest rate environment, the composition of the deposit
portfolio could shift resulting in a mix that is more sensitive to changes in interest rates than is the current mix. An increase in
market interest rates also could adversely affect the ability of BOK Financial's floating-rate borrowers to meet their higher
payment obligations. If this occurred, it could cause an increase in nonperforming assets and net charge-offs, which could
adversely affect BOK Financial's business.
We have a significant number of loans, derivative contracts, borrowings and other financial instruments with attributes that are
either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. In 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that LIBOR is to
be transitioned to alternative rates during the next four years. U.S. regulatory authorities have voiced similar support for
phasing out LIBOR. The impact of alternatives to LIBOR on the valuations, pricing and operation of our financial instruments
is not yet known.
11
Changes in mortgage interest rates could adversely affect mortgage banking operations as well as BOK Financial's
substantial holdings of residential mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing rights, and brokerage and trading
revenue.
Our available for sale residential mortgage-backed security portfolio represents investment interests in pools of residential
mortgages, composing $5.4 billion or 17% of total assets of the Company at December 31, 2017. The fair value of residential
mortgage-backed securities is highly sensitive to changes in interest rates. BOK Financial mitigates this risk somewhat by
investing principally in shorter duration mortgage products, which are less sensitive to changes in interest rates. A significant
decrease in interest rates may lead mortgage holders to refinance the mortgages constituting the pool backing the securities,
subjecting BOK Financial to a risk of prepayment and decreased return on investment due to subsequent reinvestment at lower
interest rates. A significant decrease in interest rates may also accelerate premium amortization. Conversely, a significant
increase in interest rates may cause mortgage holders to extend the term over which they repay their loans, which delays the
Company’s opportunity to reinvest funds at higher rates.
Residential mortgage-backed securities are also subject to credit risk from delinquency or default of the underlying loans. BOK
Financial mitigates this risk somewhat by investing in securities issued by U.S. government agencies. Principal and interest
payments on the loans underlying these securities are guaranteed by these agencies.
BOK Financial derives a substantial amount of revenue from mortgage loan activities, including $38 million from the
production and sale of mortgage loans, $66 million from the servicing of mortgage loans, $12 million from the trading of U.S.
agency residential mortgage backed securities and related financial instruments and $35 million from sales of financial
instruments to other mortgage lenders in 2017.
In addition, as part of BOK Financial's mortgage banking business, BOK Financial has substantial holdings of mortgage
servicing rights, totaling $253 million or 0.78% of total assets at December 31, 2017. The fair value of these rights is also very
sensitive to changes in interest rates. Falling interest rates tend to increase loan prepayments, which may lead to a decrease in
the value of related servicing rights. BOK Financial attempts to manage this risk by maintaining an active hedging program for
its mortgage servicing rights. The Company's hedging program focuses on partially hedging the risk of changes in fair value,
primarily related to changes mortgage interest rates. Other factors, such as short-term interest rates, which also impact the value
of mortgage servicing rights, may not be hedged. The value of mortgage servicing rights may also decrease due to rising
delinquency or default of the loans serviced, which are not hedged. This risk is mitigated somewhat by adherence to
underwriting standards on loans originated for sale.
Fees and commissions revenue, as well our substantial holdings of residential mortgage backed securities and mortgage
servicing rights may be adversely affected by changes in government policies and programs.
Market disruptions could impact BOK Financial’s funding sources.
BOK Financial’s subsidiary bank may rely on other financial institutions and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka as a
significant source of funds. Our ability to fund loans, manage our interest rate risk and meet other obligations depends on funds
borrowed from these sources. The inability to borrow funds at market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our
operations.
Operating Risk Factors
Dependence on technology increases cybersecurity risk.
As a financial institution, we process a significant number of customer transactions and possess a significant amount of
sensitive customer information. As technology advances, the ability to initiate transactions and access data has become more
widely distributed among mobile phones, personal computers, automated teller machines, remote deposit capture sites and
similar access points. These technological advances increase cybersecurity risk. While the Company maintains programs
intended to prevent or limit the effects of cybersecurity risk, there is no assurance that unauthorized transactions or
unauthorized access to customer information will not occur. The financial, reputational and regulatory impact of unauthorized
transactions or unauthorized access to customer information could be significant.
12
We depend on third parties for critical components of our infrastructure.
We outsource a significant portion of our information systems, communications, data management and transaction processing
to third parties. These third parties are sources of risk associated with operational errors, system interruptions or breaches,
unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and misuse of intellectual property. If the service providers encounter any
of these issues, we could be exposed to disruption of service, reputation damages, and litigation risk that could be material to
our business.
Risks Related to an Investment in Our Stock
Although publicly traded, BOK Financial's common stock has substantially less liquidity than the average trading market
for a stock quoted on the NASDAQ National Market System.
A relatively small fraction of BOK Financial's outstanding common stock is actively traded. The risks of low liquidity include
increased volatility of the price of BOK Financial's common stock. Low liquidity may also limit holders of BOK Financial's
common stock in their ability to sell or transfer BOK Financial's shares at the price, time and quantity desired.
BOK Financial's principal shareholder controls a majority of BOK Financial's common stock.
Mr. George B. Kaiser owns approximately 60% of the outstanding shares of BOK Financial's common stock at December 31,
2017. Mr. Kaiser is able to elect all of BOK Financial's directors and effectively control the vote on all matters submitted to a
vote of BOK Financial's common shareholders. Mr. Kaiser's ability to prevent an unsolicited bid for BOK Financial or any
other change in control could have an adverse effect on the market price for BOK Financial's common stock. A substantial
majority of BOK Financial's directors are not officers or employees of BOK Financial or any of its affiliates. However, because
of Mr. Kaiser's control over the election of BOK Financial's directors, he could change the composition of BOK Financial's
Board of Directors so that it would not have a majority of outside directors.
Possible future sales of shares by BOK Financial's principal shareholder could adversely affect the market price of BOK
Financial's common stock.
Mr. Kaiser has the right to sell shares of BOK Financial's common stock in compliance with the federal securities laws at any
time, or from time to time. The federal securities laws will be the only restrictions on Mr. Kaiser's ability to sell. Because of his
current control of BOK Financial, Mr. Kaiser could sell large amounts of his shares of BOK Financial's common stock by
causing BOK Financial to file a registration statement that would allow him to sell shares more easily. In addition, Mr. Kaiser
could sell his shares of BOK Financial's common stock without registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. Although
BOK Financial can make no predictions as to the effect, if any, that such sales would have on the market price of BOK
Financial's common stock, sales of substantial amounts of BOK Financial's common stock, or the perception that such sales
could occur, could adversely affect market prices. If Mr. Kaiser sells or transfers his shares of BOK Financial's common stock
as a block, another person or entity could become BOK Financial's controlling shareholder.
Statutory restrictions on subsidiary dividends and other distributions and debts of BOK Financial's subsidiaries could limit
amounts BOK Financial's subsidiaries may pay to BOK Financial.
A substantial portion of BOK Financial's cash flow typically comes from dividends paid by BOKF, NA. Statutory provisions
and regulations restrict the amount of dividends BOKF, NA may pay to BOK Financial without regulatory approval.
Management also developed, and the BOK Financial board of directors approved, an internal capital policy that is more
restrictive than the regulatory capital standards. In the event of liquidation, creditors of the Bank and other non-bank
subsidiaries of BOK Financial are entitled to receive distributions from the assets of that subsidiary before BOK Financial, as
holder of an equity interest in the subsidiaries, is entitled to receive any distributions.
13
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
BOK Financial and its subsidiaries own and lease improved real estate that is carried at $184 million, net of depreciation and
amortization. The Company’s principal offices are located in leased premises in the Bank of Oklahoma Tower in Tulsa,
Oklahoma. Banking offices are primarily located in Tulsa and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Dallas, Fort Worth and Houston,
Texas; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Denver, Colorado; Phoenix, Arizona; and Kansas City, Kansas/Missouri. Primary
operations facilities are located in Tulsa and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Dallas, Texas and Albuquerque, New Mexico. The
Company’s facilities are suitable for their respective uses and present needs.
The information set forth in Notes 5 and 14 of the Company’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which appear
elsewhere herein, provides further discussion related to properties.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth in Note 14 of the Company’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which appear elsewhere
herein, provides discussion related to legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
14
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
BOK Financial’s $0.00006 par value common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol BOKF. As of
January 31, 2018, common shareholders of record numbered 699 with 65,550,406 shares outstanding.
The highest and lowest quarterly closing bid price for shares and cash dividends declared per share of BOK Financial common
stock follows:
2017:
Low
High
Cash dividends declared
2016:
Low
High
Cash dividends declared
First
Second
Third
Fourth
$
75.15
$
74.34
$
77.30
$
84.81
0.44
85.83
0.44
89.08
0.44
$
44.72
$
51.36
$
58.49
$
58.60
0.43
64.61
0.43
69.31
0.43
82.30
93.50
0.45
67.72
84.13
0.44
15
Shareholder Return Performance Graph
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the change in cumulative shareholder return of the NASDAQ Composite Index, the
KBW NASDAQ Bank Index and the SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ Index for the period commencing December 31, 2012 and
ending December 31, 2017.*
Index
BOK Financial Corporation
NASDAQ Composite
SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ
KBW NASDAQ Bank Index
Period Ending December 31,
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
124.80
140.12
143.73
137.75
115.80
160.78
148.86
150.65
118.37
171.97
160.70
151.39
169.16
187.22
222.81
194.56
192.20
242.71
234.58
230.73
* Graph assumes value of an investment in the Company's Common Stock for each index was $100 on December 31, 2012. Cash dividends
on Common Stock are assumed to have been reinvested in BOK Financial Common Stock.
16
The following table provides information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated
purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of the Company’s common stock
during the three months ended December 31, 2017.
Period
October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2017
November 1, 2017 to November 30, 2017
December 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs 1
—
—
80,000
Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans
2,120,757
2,120,757
2,040,757
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased 2
Average
Price Paid
per Share
— $
— $
—
—
80,000
$
92.54
Total
1 On October 1, 2015, the Company's board of directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to five million shares of the Company's
common stock. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had repurchased 2,959,243 shares under this plan. Future repurchases of the
Company's common stock will vary based on market conditions, regulatory limitations and other factors.
80,000
80,000
2 The Company may repurchase shares from employees to cover the exercise price and taxes in connection with employee shared-based
compensation.
17
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data is set forth within Table 1 of Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.”
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Table 1 -- Consolidated Selected Financial Data
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Selected Financial Data
For the year:
Interest revenue
Interest expense
Net interest revenue
Provision for credit losses
Fees and commissions revenue
Net income attributable to BOK Financial
Corporation shareholders
Period-end:
Loans
Assets
Deposits
Shareholders’ equity
Nonperforming assets1
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
December 31,
$
972,751
$
829,117
$
766,828
$
732,239
$
745,371
131,050
841,701
(7,000)
683,444
81,889
747,228
65,000
686,748
63,474
703,354
34,000
650,646
67,045
665,194
—
621,319
70,894
674,477
(27,900)
603,844
334,644
232,668
288,565
292,435
316,609
17,153,424
16,989,660
15,941,154
14,208,037
32,272,160
32,772,281
31,476,128
29,089,698
22,061,305
22,748,095
21,088,158
21,140,859
3,495,367
3,274,854
3,230,556
3,302,179
290,305
356,641
251,908
256,617
12,792,264
27,015,432
20,269,327
3,020,049
247,743
Profitability Statistics
Earnings per share (based on average equivalent
shares):
Basic
Diluted
Percentages (based on daily averages):
Return on average assets
Return on average shareholders' equity
Average total equity to average assets
Common Stock Performance
Per Share:
Book value per common share
Market price: December 31 close
Market range – High close bid price
Market range – Low close bid price
Cash dividends declared
Dividend payout ratio
$
$
$
5.11
5.11
$
3.53
3.53
$
4.22
4.21
$
4.23
4.22
4.61
4.59
1.02%
9.82%
10.43%
0.72%
7.02%
10.38%
0.94%
8.65%
11.03%
1.04%
9.21%
11.47%
1.16%
10.64%
11.00%
$
53.45
92.32
93.50
74.34
1.77
$
50.12
83.04
84.13
44.72
1.73
$
49.03
59.79
72.44
53.37
1.69
$
47.78
60.04
70.18
57.87
1.62
43.88
66.32
69.36
55.05
1.54
34.45%
48.81%
40.03%
38.35%
33.43%
18
Table 1 -- Consolidated Selected Financial Data
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Selected Balance Sheet Statistics
Period-end:
Common equity Tier 1 ratio2
Tier 1 capital ratio2
Total capital ratio2
Leverage ratio2
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccruing loans4
Allowance for loan losses to loans
Combined allowances for credit losses to loans 3
Miscellaneous (at December 31)
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)
Number of TransFund locations
Fiduciary assets
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
December 31,
12.05%
12.05%
13.54%
9.31%
11.21%
11.21%
12.81%
8.72%
12.13%
12.13%
13.30%
9.25%
N/A
13.33%
14.66%
9.96%
N/A
13.77%
15.56%
10.05%
129.09%
112.33%
180.09%
245.34%
184.71%
1.34%
1.37%
4,930
2,223
1.45%
1.52%
4,884
2,021
1.41%
1.43%
4,789
1,972
1.33%
1.34%
4,743
2,080
1.45%
1.47%
4,632
1,998
$ 48,761,477
$42,378,053
$38,333,638
$35,997,877
$ 30,137,092
Mortgage loans serviced for others
22,046,632
21,997,568
19,678,226
16,162,887
13,718,942
1 Includes nonaccruing loans, renegotiated loans and assets acquired in satisfaction of loans. Excludes loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing.
2 Risk-based capital ratios for 2017, 2016 and 2015 calculated under revised regulatory capital rules issued July 2013 and effective for the Company on
January 1, 2015. Previous risk-based ratios presented are calculated in accordance with then current regulatory capital rules.
3 Includes allowance for loan losses and accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk.
4 Excludes residential mortgage loans guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. government.
Management’s Assessment of Operations and Financial Condition
Overview
The following discussion is management’s analysis to assist in the understanding and evaluation of the financial condition and
results of operations of BOK Financial Corporation ("BOK Financial" or "the Company"). This discussion should be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes and selected financial data presented elsewhere in this
report.
For 2017, the U.S. economy continued to grow, supported by declining unemployment, continued payroll growth and modest
inflation. The national unemployment rate fell to a 17-year low at 4.1% in December of 2017. Inflation also remained below
2% for 2017. The minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") of the Federal Reserve for December indicated
continued strengthening of labor market conditions, real gross domestic product rising at a solid pace in the second half of 2017
and unchanged longer-run inflation expectations. Investment returns remained strong for 2017, with the S&P 500 index up 19%
for the year. This represents the 9th year in a row of positive returns for the S&P 500 index.
The Federal Reserve increased the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points three different times during 2017.
The 10-year U.S. Treasury note finished the year yielding 2.40%. We expect rates to continue to rise during 2018. Global
quantitative easing and lack of inflation, combined with continued gradual federal funds rate increases by the Federal Reserve
are contributing to a flattening of the yield curve. Higher long-term interest rates are likely in 2018.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Act was signed into law, lowering tax rates on corporations, pass-through entities,
individuals and estates. We believe that the passage of tax reform will be beneficial to economic growth across our footprint by
providing certainty for our customers to base their investment and borrowing decisions.
19
Performance Summary
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $334.6 million or $5.11 per diluted share compared with net income
of $232.7 million or $3.53 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2016.
The Tax Reform Act resulted in an $11.7 million or $0.18 per share reduction of net income in the fourth quarter of 2017. A
decrease in the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% required us to revalue our deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Provisions of the Tax Reform Act also limit the deductibility of certain other expenses.
Highlights of 2017 included:
• Net interest revenue totaled $841.7 million for 2017, up from $747.2 million for 2016. The increase in net interest revenue
was driven by both widening spreads and growth in average assets. Net interest margin was 2.92% for 2017 compared
to 2.66% for 2016. Average earning assets were $29.6 billion for 2017, up $646 million over 2016.
•
Fees and commissions revenue was $683.4 million for 2017, largely unchanged compared to 2016. Fiduciary and asset
management revenue grew by $27.4 million driven by growth in assets under management, improved pricing discipline
and decreased fee waivers. Mortgage banking revenue decreased $29.2 million. Production volumes decreased primarily
due to higher mortgage interest rates and the Company's strategic decision to exit the correspondent lending channel.
This impact was partially offset by improved gain on sale margins. Brokerage and trading revenue decreased $6.8 million,
primarily due to decreases in customer hedging revenue related to our mortgage banking customers and retail brokerage
revenue.
• The change in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, net of economic hedges, decreased other operating revenue by
$1.9 million in 2017, compared to a $28.4 million decrease in other operating revenue in 2016. In 2016, an unexpected
85 basis point increase in the 10-year U.S. Treasury interest rate and related interest rates due to the market's reaction to
the outcome of the U.S. presidential election increased the fair value of our servicing rights $39.8 million. The fair value
of our economic hedges decreased $56.8 million.
• Other operating expense totaled $1.0 billion, largely unchanged compared to the prior year. Personnel expense increased
$20.3 million, primarily due to increased share-based compensation expense. Non-personnel expense decreased $12.4
million compared to the prior year, primarily due to lower deposit insurance expenses, litigation and settlement costs and
mortgage banking expense, partially offset by increased data processing and communications expense.
• The Company recorded a $7.0 million negative provision for credit losses in 2017, compared to a $65.0 million provision
for credit losses in 2016. Nonaccruing loans not guaranteed by U.S. government agencies decreased $40 million compared
to December 31, 2016. Potential problem loans decreased $158 million and other loans especially mentioned decreased
$111 million. Net charge-offs declined to $16.0 million or 0.09% of average loans for 2017, compared to net charge-offs
of $34.8 million or 0.21% of average loans for 2016. The combined allowance for credit losses totaled $234 million or
1.37% of outstanding loans at December 31, 2017.
•
•
Period-end outstanding loan balances were $17.2 billion at December 31, 2017, a $164 million or 1% increase over the
prior year. Commercial loan balances grew by $343 million or 3%, partially offset by a $329 million or 9% decrease in
commercial real estate loans. Residential mortgage loans increased $24 million and personal loans grew by $126 million.
Period-end deposits totaled $22.1 billion at December 31, 2017, a $687 million or 3% decrease compared to December 31,
2016. Interest-bearing transaction deposits decreased $615 million and time deposit balances decreased $123 million.
Savings account balances increased $44 million and demand deposit balances were largely unchanged compared to the
prior year.
• The Company's common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was 12.05% at December 31, 2017. In addition, the Tier 1 capital
ratio was 12.05%, total capital ratio was 13.54% and leverage ratio was 9.31% at December 31, 2017. At December 31,
2016, the Tier 1 capital ratio was 11.21%, the total capital ratio was 12.81% and the leverage ratio was 8.72%.
• The Company repurchased 80,000 shares at an average price of $92.54 per share during 2017. The Company repurchased
1,005,169 shares at an average price of $66.45 during 2016.
• The Company paid cash dividends of $1.77 per common share during 2017 and $1.73 per common share in 2016.
20
Net income for the fourth quarter of 2017 totaled $72.5 million or $1.11 per diluted share, up from $50.0 million or $0.76 per
diluted share for the fourth quarter of 2016.
Highlights of the fourth quarter of 2017 included:
• Net interest revenue totaled $216.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2017, up $22.7 million over the fourth quarter of
2016. Net interest margin was 2.97% for the fourth quarter of 2017, up from 2.69% for the fourth quarter of 2016. Net
interest revenue increased primarily due to three 25 basis point increases in the federal funds rate by the Federal Reserve
during 2017 and growth in average loan balances.
•
Fees and commissions revenue totaled $168.2 million, up $6.1 million over the fourth quarter of 2016. Fiduciary and
asset management revenue grew by $7.2 million, primarily due to growth in assets under management. Brokerage and
trading revenue increased $4.5 million, primarily due to a $5.0 million decrease in the fair value of trading securities in
the fourth quarter of 2016. Mortgage banking revenue decreased $4.1 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2016.
Production volumes decreased primarily due to higher mortgage interest rates. Gain on sale margins were lower as higher-
margin refinance activity also declined.
• The loss in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, net of economic hedges, was $1.4 million in the fourth quarter of
2017 compared to $17.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2016. The fourth quarter of 2016 included $17.0 million of the
previously noted decrease in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, net of economic hedges due to an unexpected
increase in the 10-year U.S. Treasury interest rate and related interest rates.
• Operating expenses in the fourth quarter totaled $264.0 million, a $1.6 million decrease compared to the prior year. The
fourth quarter of 2016 included $5.0 million of severance and other expenses related to workforce reductions and $4.7
million of integration costs related to the Mobank acquisition.
21
Critical Accounting Policies & Estimates
The Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company's accounting policies are more fully described
in Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management makes significant assumptions and estimates in the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes in conformity with GAAP that may be highly
subjective, complex and subject to variability. Actual results could differ significantly from these assumptions and estimates.
The following discussion addresses the most critical areas where these assumptions and estimates could affect the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company. These critical accounting policies and estimates have been
discussed with the appropriate committees of the Board of Directors.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Accrual for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Risk
The appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses and accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk is assessed quarterly by
management based on an ongoing evaluation of the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio and probable
estimated losses on unused commitments to provide financing. A consistent, well-documented methodology has been
developed and is applied by an independent Credit Administration department to ensure consistency across the Company. The
allowance for loan losses consists of specific allowances attributed to certain impaired loans that have not yet been charged
down to amounts we expect to recover, general allowances for unimpaired loans that are based on estimated loss rates by loan
class and nonspecific allowances for risks beyond factors specific to a particular portfolio segment or loan class. There have
been no material changes in the approach or techniques utilized in developing the allowance for loan losses and accrual for off-
balance sheet credit risk during 2017.
Loans are considered impaired when it is probable that we will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of
the loan agreements, including loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring. Internally risk graded loans are evaluated
individually for impairment. Substantially all commercial and commercial real estate loans and certain residential mortgage and
personal loans are risk graded through a quarterly evaluation of the borrower's ability to repay.
Specific allowances for impaired loans that have not yet been charged down to amounts we expect to recover are measured by
an evaluation of estimated future cash flows discounted at the loan's initial effective interest rate or the fair value of collateral
for certain collateral dependent loans. Collateral value of real property is generally based on third party appraisals that conform
to Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, less estimated selling costs. Appraised values are on an “as-is” basis
and generally are not adjusted by the Company. Updated appraisals are obtained at least annually or more frequently if market
conditions indicate collateral values may have declined. Collateral value of mineral rights is determined by our internal staff of
engineers based on projected cash flows under current market conditions. The value of other collateral is generally determined
by our special assets staff based on liquidation cash flows under current market conditions. Collateral values and available cash
resources that support impaired loans are evaluated quarterly. Historical statistics may be used as a practical way to estimate
impairment in limited situations, such as when a collateral dependent loan is identified as impaired near the end of a reporting
period until an updated appraisal of collateral value is received or a full assessment of future cash flows is completed. Estimates
of future cash flows and collateral values require significant judgments and may be volatile.
General allowances for unimpaired loans are based on estimated loss rates by loan class. The appropriate historical gross loss
rate for each loan class is determined by the greater of the current loss rate based on the most recent twelve months or a ten-
year average gross loss rate. Recoveries are not directly considered in the estimation of historical loss rates. Recoveries
generally do not follow predictable patterns and are not received until well-after the charge-off date as a result of protracted
legal proceedings. For risk graded loans, historical loss rates are adjusted for changes in risk rating. For each loan class, the
weighted average current risk grade is compared to the weighted average long-term risk grade. This comparison determines
whether the risk in each loan class is increasing or decreasing. Historical loss rates are adjusted upward or downward in
proportion to changes in weighted average risk grading. General allowances for unimpaired loans also consider inherent risks
identified for a given loan class. Inherent risks include consideration of the loss rates that most appropriately represent the
current credit cycle and other factors attributable to a specific loan class which have not yet been represented in the historical
gross loss rates or risk grading. Examples of these factors include changes in commodity prices or engineering imprecision,
which may affect the value of reserves that secure our energy loan portfolio, construction risk that may affect commercial real
estate loans, changes in regulations and public policy that may disproportionately impact health care loans and changes in loan
product types.
Nonspecific allowances are maintained for risks beyond factors specific to a particular portfolio segment or loan class. These
factors include trends in the economy in our primary lending areas, concentrations in loans with large balances and other
relevant factors.
22
Fair Value Measurement
Certain assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Fair value is defined by
applicable accounting guidance as the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants in the principal markets for the given asset or liability at the measurement date based on market conditions at that
date. An orderly transaction assumes exposure to the market for a customary period for marketing activities prior to the
measurement date and not a forced liquidation or distressed sale.
A hierarchy for fair value has been established that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value into
three broad categories: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), other observable
inputs that can be observed either directly or indirectly (Level 2) and unobservable inputs for assets or liabilities (Level 3). Fair
value may be recorded for certain assets and liabilities every reporting period on a recurring basis or under certain
circumstances on a non-recurring basis.
The following represents significant fair value measurements included in the Consolidated Financial Statements based on
estimates. See Note 18 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of fair value measurement and
disclosure included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
We have a significant investment in mortgage servicing rights. Our mortgage servicing rights are primarily retained
from sales in the secondary market of residential mortgage loans we have originated or purchased from correspondent
lenders. Occasionally, mortgage servicing rights may be purchased from other lenders. Both originated and purchased
mortgage servicing rights are initially recognized at fair value. We carry all mortgage servicing rights at fair value.
Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings as they occur.
Mortgage servicing rights are not traded in active markets. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is determined
by discounting the projected cash flows. Certain significant assumptions and estimates used in valuing mortgage
servicing rights are based on current market sources including projected prepayment speeds, assumed servicing costs,
earnings on escrow deposits, ancillary income and discount rates. Assumptions used to value our mortgage servicing
rights are considered significant unobservable inputs and represent our best estimate of assumptions that market
participants would use to value this asset. A separate third party model is used to estimate prepayment speeds based on
interest rates, housing turnover rates, estimated loan curtailment, anticipated defaults and other relevant factors. The
prepayment model is updated periodically for changes in market conditions and adjusted to better correlate with actual
performance of our servicing portfolio. The discount rate is based on benchmark rates for mortgage loans plus a
market spread expected by investors in servicing rights. Significant assumptions used to determine the fair value of
our mortgage servicing rights are presented in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. At least annually, we
request estimates of fair value from outside sources to corroborate the results of the valuation model.
The assumptions used in this model are primarily based on mortgage interest rates. Evaluation of the effect of a
change in one assumption without considering the effect of that change on other assumptions is not meaningful.
Considering all related assumptions, we expect a 50 basis point increase in primary mortgage interest rates to increase
the fair value of our servicing rights by $26 million. We expect a $33 million decrease in the fair value of our
mortgage servicing rights from a 50 basis point decrease in primary mortgage interest rates.
Valuation of Derivative Instruments
We use interest rate derivative instruments to manage our interest rate risk. We also offer interest rate, commodity,
foreign exchange and equity derivative contracts to our customers. All derivative instruments are carried on the
balance sheet at fair value. Fair values for exchange-traded contracts are based on quoted prices in an active market for
identical instruments. Fair values for over-the-counter interest rate contracts used to manage our interest rate risk are
generated internally using third-party valuation models. Inputs used in third-party valuation models to determine fair
values are considered significant other observable inputs. Fair values for interest rate, commodity, foreign exchange
and equity contracts used in our customer hedging programs are based on valuations generated internally by third-
party provided pricing models. These models use significant other observable market inputs to estimate fair values.
Changes in assumptions used in these pricing models could significantly affect the reported fair values of derivative
assets and liabilities, though the net effect of these changes should not significantly affect earnings.
23
Credit risk is considered in determining the fair value of derivative instruments. Deterioration in the credit rating of
customers or dealers reduces the fair value of asset contracts. The reduction in fair value is recognized in earnings
during the current period. Fair value adjustments are based on various risk factors including but not limited to
counterparty credit rating or equivalent loan grading, derivative contract notional size, price volatility of the
underlying commodity, duration of the derivative contracts and expected loss severity. Expected loss severity is based
on historical losses for similarly risk-graded commercial loan customers. Deterioration in our credit rating below
investment grade would affect the fair value of our derivative liabilities. In the event of a credit down-grade, the fair
value of our derivative liabilities would decrease. The reduction in fair value would be recognized in earnings in the
current period. The impact of credit valuation adjustments on the total valuation of derivative contracts was not
significant.
Valuation of Securities
The fair value of our securities portfolio is generally based on a single price for each financial instrument provided to
us by a third-party pricing service determined by one or more of the following:
• Quoted prices for similar, but not identical, assets or liabilities in active markets;
• Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
•
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, such as interest rate and yield curves, volatilities,
prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates;
• Other inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market inputs.
The underlying methods used by the third-party pricing services are considered in determining the primary inputs used
to determine fair values. We evaluate the methodologies employed by the third-party pricing services by comparing
the price provided by the pricing service with other sources, including brokers' quotes, sales or purchases of similar
instruments and discounted cash flows to establish a basis for reliance on the pricing service values. Significant
differences between the pricing service provided value and other sources are discussed with the pricing service to
understand the basis for their values. Based on all observable inputs, management may adjust prices obtained from
third-party pricing services to more appropriately reflect the prices that would be received to sell assets or paid to
transfer liabilities in orderly transactions in the current market. No significant adjustments were made to prices
provided by third-party pricing services at December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
Valuation of Impaired Loans and Real Estate and Other Repossessed Assets
The fair value of collateral for certain impaired loans and real estate and other repossessed assets is measured on a
non-recurring basis. The fair value of real estate is generally based on unadjusted third-party appraisals derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Fair value measurements based on these appraisals are
considered to be based on Level 2 inputs. Fair value measurements based on appraisals that are not based on
observable inputs or that require significant adjustments by us or fair value measurements that are not based on third-
party appraisals are considered to be based on Level 3 inputs. Significant unobservable inputs include listing prices for
comparable assets, uncorroborated expert opinions or management's knowledge of the collateral or industry.
The fair value of mineral rights is generally determined by our internal staff of engineers based on projected cash
flows from proven oil and gas reserves under existing economic and operating conditions. Proven oil and gas reserves
are estimated quantities that geological and engineering data demonstrate, with reasonable certainty, to be recoverable
in future years from known reservoirs using existing prices and costs. Projected cash flows incorporate assumptions
related to a number of factors including production, sales prices, operating expenses, severance, ad valorem taxes,
capital costs and appropriate discount rate. Fair values determined through this process are considered to be based on
Level 3 inputs.
Income Taxes
Determination of income tax expense and related assets and liabilities is complex and requires estimates and judgments when
applying tax laws, rules, regulations and interpretations. It also requires judgments as to future earnings and the timing of future
events. Accrued income taxes represent an estimate of net amounts due to or from taxing jurisdictions based upon these
estimates, interpretations and judgments.
24
Management evaluates the Company's current tax expense or benefit based upon estimates of taxable income, tax credits and
statutory tax rates. Annually, we file tax returns with each jurisdiction where we conduct business and adjust recognized income
tax expense or benefit to filed tax returns.
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based upon the differences between the values of assets and liabilities as
recognized in the financial statements and their related tax basis using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some
portion of the entire deferred tax asset may not be realized.
We also recognize the benefit of uncertain income tax positions when based upon all relevant evidence, it is more-likely-than-
not that our position would prevail upon examination, including resolution of related appeals or litigation, based upon the
technical merits of the position. Unrecognized tax benefits, including estimated interest and penalties, are part of our current
accrued income tax liability. Estimated penalties and interest are recognized in income tax expense. Income tax expense in
future periods may decrease if an uncertain tax position is favorably resolved, generally upon completion of an examination by
the taxing authorities, expiration of a statute of limitations, or changes in facts and circumstances.
25
Results of Operations
Net Interest Revenue and Net Interest Margin
Net interest revenue is the interest earned on debt securities, loans and other interest-earning assets less interest paid for
interest-bearing deposits and other borrowings. The net interest margin is calculated by dividing tax-equivalent net interest
revenue by average interest-earning assets. Net interest spread is the difference between the average rate earned on interest-
earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is typically greater than net interest
spread due to interest income earned on assets funded by non-interest bearing liabilities such as demand deposits and equity.
Tax-equivalent net interest revenue totaled $858.9 million for 2017, up from $764.8 million for 2016. Net interest margin was
2.92% for 2017 and 2.66% for 2016. Tax-equivalent net interest revenue increased $94.1 million over the prior year. Net
interest revenue increased $61.2 million due to rates and $32.9 million from growth in earning assets. The benefit of an
increase in short-term interest rates on floating-rate earning assets was partially offset by higher borrowing costs. Table 2 shows
the effects on net interest revenue due to changes in average balances and interest rates for the various types of earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, see the Annual and Quarterly Financial Summary of consolidated daily average
balances, yields and rates following the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The tax-equivalent yield on earning assets was 3.36% for 2017 up from 2.95% in 2016, primarily due to increases in short-term
interest rates resulting from three 25 basis point increases in the federal funds rate by the Federal Reserve during the year. Loan
yields increased 50 basis points to 4.13% . The yield on interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents increased 57 basis points to
1.10%. The available for sale securities portfolio yield increased 10 basis points to 2.13%. The yield on fair value option
securities held as an economic hedge of our mortgage servicing rights increased 88 basis points to 2.81% primarily related to a
change in the mix of securities and an increase in average rates. Funding costs increased 25 basis points over 2016. The cost of
interest-bearing deposits was limited to a 9 basis point increase due to a lack of market pricing pressure. The cost of other
borrowed funds increased 55 basis points. The cost of subordinated debentures increased 280 basis points due to the full year
impact of higher fixed rate debt issued in the second quarter of 2016 to replace lower variable rate debt paid off in the third
quarter of 2016. The benefit to net interest margin from earning assets funded by non-interest bearing liabilities was 23 basis
points for 2017, up from 13 basis points for 2016.
Average earning assets for 2017 increased $646 million or 2% over 2016. Average loans, net of allowance for loan losses,
increased $812 million. Growth in average commercial, residential and personal loans was partially offset by a decrease in
average commercial real estate loan balances. Average loan balances were up $439 million related to the full year's impact of
loans from the Mobank acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2016. The average balance of the fair value option securities
portfolio held as an economic hedge of our mortgage servicing rights increased $270 million. Average trading securities
balances increased $204 million primarily related to expanded U.S. mortgage-backed securities trading activity. The average
balance of available for sale securities, which consists largely of residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities
guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, decreased $414 million. We purchase securities to supplement earnings and to
manage interest rate risk. We have reduced the size of our bond portfolio during the past three years through normal monthly
runoff to better position the balance sheet for an environment of rising longer-term rates. Our outlook for earning assets in 2018
is for mid single-digit growth in loan balances and flat to slightly decreasing securities portfolio balances. We expect stable to
rising net interest margin and increasing net interest revenue. The average balance of residential mortgage loans held for sale
decreased by $125 million.
Growth in average assets was funded by growth in demand and interest-bearing deposits, partially offset by decreased
repurchase agreements and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Banks. Total average deposits grew by $1.3 billion over
the prior year, including $491 million related to the full-year impact of the Mobank acquisition. Average demand deposit
balances were up $839 million over the prior year and average interest-bearing transaction account balances increased $475
million. This growth was partially offset by a $66 million decrease in average time deposits. Average borrowed funds decreased
$273 million over the prior year. Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Banks decreased $103 million and average
repurchase agreement balances were down $155 million compared to the prior year. Subordinated debenture and funds
purchased balances also declined compared to the prior year.
26
Our overall objective is to manage the Company’s balance sheet to be relatively neutral to changes in interest rates as is further
described in the Market Risk section of this report. As shown in Table 21, approximately 81% of our commercial and
commercial real estate loan portfolios are either variable rate loans or fixed rate loans that will re-price within one year. These
loans are funded primarily by deposit accounts that are either non-interest bearing, or that re-price more slowly than the
loans. The result is a balance sheet that would be asset sensitive, which means that assets generally re-price more quickly than
liabilities. Among the strategies that we use to manage toward a relatively rate-neutral position, we purchase fixed rate
residential mortgage-backed securities issued primarily by U.S. government agencies and fund them with market rate sensitive
liabilities. The liability-sensitive nature of this strategy provides an offset to the asset-sensitive characteristics of our loan
portfolio. We also may use derivative instruments to manage our interest rate risk.
The effectiveness of these strategies is reflected in the overall change in net interest revenue due to changes in interest rates as
shown in Table 2 and in the interest rate sensitivity projections as shown in the Market Risk section of this report.
Fourth Quarter 2017 Net Interest Revenue
Tax-equivalent net interest revenue totaled $221.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2017, an increase of $22.4 million over the
fourth quarter of 2016. Net interest margin was 2.97% for the fourth quarter of 2017 compared to 2.69% for the fourth quarter
of 2016. Net interest revenue increased $19.1 million primarily due to three 25 basis point increases in the federal funds rate by
the Federal Reserve during 2017 and $3.3 million primarily due to the growth in average loan balances.
The tax-equivalent yield on earning assets was 3.49% for the fourth quarter of 2017, up 51 basis points over the fourth quarter
of 2016. Loan yields increased 62 basis points to 4.29%. The available for sale securities portfolio yield increased 21 basis
points to 2.21%. The yield on interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents increased 72 basis points to 1.27%. Yield on fair value
option securities held as an economic hedge of our mortgage servicing rights was up 191 basis points to 2.90% due to a change
in the mix of securities and increased interest rates. Funding costs were up 35 basis points over the fourth quarter of 2016. The
cost of interest-bearing deposits was limited to a 16 basis point increase over the fourth quarter of 2016 by a lack of market
pricing pressure. The cost of other borrowed funds increased 72 basis points. The benefit to net interest margin from earning
assets funded by non-interest bearing liabilities was 27 basis points in the fourth quarter of 2017, up from 15 basis points in the
fourth quarter of 2016.
Average earning assets for the fourth quarter of 2017 increased $573 million over the fourth quarter of 2016, including $274
million related to the full-quarter's impact of the acquisition of Mobank on December 1, 2016. Average loans, net of allowance
for loan losses, increased $458 million due primarily to growth in commercial, residential mortgage and personal loans,
partially offset by decreased commercial real estate loan balances. The increase in average loans also included $292 million
related to the full-quarter's impact of the Mobank acquisition. Fair value option securities held as an economic hedge of
mortgage servicing rights were up $582 million over the fourth quarter of 2016, partially offset by a $331 million decrease in
the available for sale securities portfolio.
Average deposits increased $458 million over the fourth quarter of 2016, including $312 million related to the full-quarter's
impact of the Mobank acquisition. Average demand deposit balances increased $293 million and average interest-bearing
transaction accounts increased $163 million. Average time deposits decreased $43 million. Average borrowed funds were
largely unchanged compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. Increased Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings were offset by
lower repurchase agreement balances.
2016 Net Interest Revenue
Tax-equivalent net interest revenue for 2016 was $764.8 million, up from $715.8 million for 2015. Net interest margin was
2.66% for 2016 compared to 2.60% for 2015. The $49.0 million increase in tax equivalent net interest revenue was due
primarily to growth in earning assets. The benefit of an increase in short-term interest rates during 2016 on the loan portfolio
and interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents yields was offset by higher borrowing costs.
27
The tax-equivalent yield on average earning assets increased 11 basis points over 2015. Loan yields increased 5 basis points
primarily due growth in variable rate loans and an increase in short-term interest rates. The yield on trading securities increased
94 basis points due to a change in mix toward more higher-yielding U.S. agency residential mortgage-backed securities. The
yield on interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents increased 26 basis points. The available for sale securities portfolio yield
increased 4 basis points. The benefit from improved yields on investment securities was offset by lower yields on restricted
equity and fair value option securities. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 7 basis points. The cost of interest-
bearing deposits decreased 1 basis point while the cost of other borrowed funds increased 25 basis points, primarily due to
increases in federal funds rates by the Federal Reserve in the fourth quarters of 2016 and 2015. The cost of subordinated
debentures increased 98 basis points as lower variable rate debt outstanding during 2015 was replaced by higher fixed rate debt.
The Company issued $150 million of 40 year, 5.375% fixed rate subordinated debt during the second quarter of 2016 that
replaced $227 million of floating rate subordinated debt based on three-month LIBOR plus 0.69%. The benefit to net interest
margin from earning assets funded by non-interest bearing liabilities was 13 basis points for 2016, compared to 11 basis points
for 2015.
Average earning assets increased $1.2 billion or 4% during 2016. Average loans, net of allowance for loan losses, increased
$1.3 billion. Average trading securities balances increased $168 million primarily related to the addition of a new group trading
in U.S. mortgage-backed securities during 2016. The average balance of available for sale securities, which consists largely of
residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, decreased $152 million. We
reduced the size of our bond portfolio during 2014, 2015 and 2016 through normal monthly runoff to better position the
balance sheet for an environment of rising longer-term rates. Growth in average assets was funded by increased borrowings
from the Federal Home Loan Banks and demand deposits growth, partially offset by lower interest-bearing deposits and
subordinated debt balances. Total average deposits were largely unchanged compared to 2015. Average demand deposit account
balances grew by $426 million. This growth was offset by a $328 million decrease in average time deposit balances and a $175
million decrease in average interest-bearing transaction account balances. Average borrowed funds balances increased $1.6
billion over 2015. Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Banks increased $1.1 billion, partially offset by decreased funds
purchased, repurchase agreements and subordinated debt balances.
28
Table 2 – Volume/Rate Analysis
(In thousands)
Year Ended
Year Ended
December 31, 2017 / 2016
December 31, 2016 / 2015
Change Due To1
Change Due To1
Change
Volume
Yield /
Rate
Change
Volume
Yield /
Rate
Tax-equivalent interest revenue:
Interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents
$
11,402
$
(252) $
11,654
$
5,146
$
(58) $
Trading securities
Investment securities:
Taxable securities
Tax-exempt securities
Total investment securities
Available for sale securities:
Taxable securities
Tax-exempt securities
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities
Restricted equity securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Loans
Total tax-equivalent interest revenue
Interest expense:
Transaction deposits
Savings deposits
Time deposits
Funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total interest expense
Tax-equivalent net interest revenue
Change in tax-equivalent adjustment
8,424
8,122
302
6,158
4,318
(353)
(690)
(1,043)
2,232
(789)
1,443
10,032
1,252
(3,952)
115,678
143,236
14,721
(27)
(1,385)
235
187
33,366
2,064
49,161
94,075
(398)
(196)
(1,567)
(1,763)
(6,901)
(994)
(7,895)
5,886
(257)
(4,389)
29,407
28,859
851
27
(728)
(99)
(114)
(946)
(3,023)
(4,032)
32,891
(157)
877
720
9,133
205
9,338
4,146
1,509
437
86,271
114,377
13,870
(54)
(657)
334
301
34,312
5,087
53,193
61,184
(664)
1,596
932
690
12
702
(2,541)
3,706
(944)
54,274
67,433
5,085
3
(528)
(961)
(1,489)
(2,617)
(655)
(3,272)
(1,290)
5,490
(416)
46,549
49,832
(16)
39
(8,764)
(4,139)
121
(34)
21,045
959
18,415
49,018
5,144
13
(52)
8,239
(1,445)
2,639
47,193
5,204
1,840
(136)
2,557
2,421
3,307
667
3,974
(1,251)
(1,784)
(528)
7,725
17,601
5,101
(36)
(4,625)
108
18
12,806
2,404
15,776
1,825
Net interest revenue
1 Changes attributable to both volume and yield/rate are allocated to both volume and yield/rate on an equal basis.
94,473
43,874
$
$
29
Table 2 – Volume/Rate Analysis (continued)
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2017 / 2016
Change Due To1
Change
Volume
Yield /
Rate
Tax-equivalent interest revenue:
Interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents
$
3,511
$
(128) $
Trading securities
Investment securities:
Taxable securities
Tax-exempt securities
Total investment securities
Available for sale securities:
Taxable securities
Tax-exempt securities
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities
Restricted equity securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Loans
Total tax-equivalent interest revenue
Interest expense:
Transaction deposits
Savings deposits
Time deposits
Funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total interest expense
Tax-equivalent net interest revenue
Change in tax-equivalent adjustment
75
5
(277)
(272)
2,596
(203)
2,393
5,229
402
(446)
28,880
39,772
5,002
(4)
156
101
161
11,927
22
17,365
22,407
(258)
746
52
(527)
(475)
(1,872)
(221)
(2,093)
2,804
44
(757)
3,488
3,629
144
14
(119)
3
(36)
330
4
340
3,289
3,639
(671)
(47)
250
203
4,468
18
4,486
2,425
358
311
25,392
36,143
4,858
(18)
275
98
197
11,597
18
17,025
19,118
Net interest revenue
1 Changes attributable to both volume and yield/rate are allocated to both volume and yield/rate on an equal basis.
22,665
$
30
Other Operating Revenue
Other operating revenue was $695.1 million for 2017, up $21.1 million or 3% over 2016. The change in the fair value of
mortgage servicing rights, net of economic hedges, decreased other operating revenue by $1.9 million in 2017 and $28.4
million in 2016.
Table 3 – Other Operating Revenue
(In thousands)
Brokerage and trading revenue
Transaction card revenue1
Fiduciary and asset management revenue
Deposit service charges and fees1
Mortgage banking revenue
Other revenue
Total fees and commissions revenue
Other gains, net
Gain (loss) on derivatives, net
Gain (loss) on fair value option securities, net
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights
Gain on available for sale securities, net
Total other-than-temporary impairment
Portion of loss recognized in (reclassified from) other
comprehensive income
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
$
131,601
$
138,377
$
129,556
$
134,437
$
125,478
119,988
162,893
112,075
104,719
52,168
683,444
9,004
779
(2,733)
172
4,428
—
—
—
116,452
135,477
111,499
133,914
51,029
686,748
4,030
(15,685)
(10,555)
(2,193)
11,675
—
—
—
109,579
126,153
109,473
126,002
49,883
650,646
5,702
430
(3,684)
(4,853)
12,058
(2,443)
624
(1,819)
104,940
115,652
109,660
109,093
47,537
621,319
2,953
2,776
10,189
(16,445)
1,539
(373)
—
(373)
98,533
96,082
113,400
121,934
48,417
603,844
4,875
(4,367)
(15,212)
22,720
10,720
(2,574)
266
(2,308)
620,272
Total other operating revenue
1
$
Check card revenue was reclassified from transaction card revenue to deposit service charges and fees for all periods presented.
621,958
674,020
658,480
695,094
$
$
$
$
Fees and commissions revenue
Diversified sources of fees and commissions revenue are a significant part of our business strategy and represented 45% of total
revenue for 2017, excluding provision for credit losses and gains and losses on asset sales, securities and derivatives and the
change in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights. We believe that a variety of fee revenue sources provides an offset to
changes in interest rates, values in the equity markets, commodity prices and consumer spending, all of which can be
volatile. As an example of this strength, many of the economic factors such as rising interest rates resulting in growth in net
interest revenue or fiduciary and asset management revenue, may also decrease mortgage banking production volumes. We
expect growth in other operating revenue to come through offering new products and services and by further development of
our presence in other markets. However, current and future economic conditions, regulatory constraints, increased competition
and saturation in our existing markets could affect the rate of future increases.
Brokerage and trading revenue, which includes revenues from trading, customer hedging, retail broker and investment banking,
decreased $6.8 million or 5% compared to the prior year. Excluding a $5.0 million decrease in the value of trading securities
due to the unexpected increase in interest rates in 2016, brokerage and trading revenue decreased $11.8 million or 9%. The
revenue decrease generally resulted from customer reaction to rising interest rates along with changes in regulations.
Trading revenue includes net realized and unrealized gains primarily related to sales of U.S. government securities, residential
mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government agencies and municipal securities to institutional customers and
related derivative instruments. Trading revenue was $43.6 million for 2017, a decrease of $4.4 million from 2016.
31
Customer hedging revenue is based primarily on realized and unrealized changes in the fair value of derivative contracts held
for customer risk management programs. As more fully discussed under Customer Derivative Programs in Note 3 of the
Consolidated Financial Statements, we offer commodity, interest rate, foreign exchange and equity derivatives to our
customers. Derivative contracts executed with customers are offset with contracts between selected counterparties and
exchanges to minimize market risk from changes in commodity prices, interest rates or foreign exchange rates. Customer
hedging revenue totaled $44.1 million for 2017, a decrease of $3.0 million or 6% compared to 2016. The volume of derivative
contracts sold to our mortgage banking customers used to hedge their pipelines of mortgage loan originations decreased as
average mortgage rates rose during 2017.
Revenue earned from retail brokerage transactions totaled $22.9 million for 2017, a decrease of $3.1 million or 12% compared
the the prior year. Retail brokerage revenue is primarily based on fees and commissions earned on sales of fixed income
securities, annuities, mutual funds and other financial instruments to retail customers. Revenue is primarily based on the
volume of customer transactions and applicable commission rate for each type of product. The implementation of the new
Department of Labor ("DOL") fiduciary rule in the second quarter of 2017 has negatively impacted retail brokerage revenue.
New regulation issued by the DOL amended the definition of investment advice under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act ("ERISA"). The new rule is designed to provide better protection to plans, participants, beneficiaries and
individual retirement account ("IRA") owners against conflicts of interest, imprudence and disloyalty.
Investment banking, which includes fees earned upon completion of underwriting, financial advisory services and loan
syndication fees totaled $20.9 million for 2017, a decrease of $1.2 million or 6% compared 2016, related to the timing and
volume of completed transactions.
Transaction card revenue depends largely on the volume and amount of transactions processed, the number of TransFund
automated teller machine (“ATM”) locations and the number of merchants served. Transaction card revenue totaled $120
million for 2017, a $3.5 million or 3% increase over 2016. Revenues from the processing of transactions on behalf of the
members of our TransFund electronic funds transfer ("EFT") network totaled $73.5 million, up $2.9 million or 4% over 2016,
due primarily to a $2.1 million customer early termination penalty received in the third quarter of 2017. The number of
TransFund ATM locations totaled 2,223 at December 31, 2017 compared to 2,021 at December 31, 2016. Merchant services
fees paid by customers for account management and electronic processing of card transactions totaled $46.5 million, an
increase of $608 thousand or 1% over the prior year.
Fiduciary and asset management revenue is earned through managing or holding of assets for customers and executing
transactions or providing related services. Approximately 80% of fiduciary and asset management revenue is primarily based
on the fair value of assets. Rates applied to those asset values vary based on the nature of the relationship. Fiduciary and
managed asset relationships generally have a higher fee rate than non-fiduciary and/or managed relationships.
Fiduciary and asset management revenue grew $27.4 million or 20% over 2016, primarily due to growth in assets under
management, improved pricing discipline and decreased fee waivers.
We earn fees as administrator to and investment adviser for the Cavanal Hill Funds, a diversified, open-ended investment
company established as a business trust under the Investment Company Act of 1940. BOKF, NA is custodian and Cavanal Hill
Distributors, Inc. is distributor for the Cavanal Hill Funds. Products of the Cavanal Hill Funds are offered to customers,
employee benefit plans, trusts and the general public in the ordinary course of business. In recent years, we voluntarily waived
administration fees on the Cavanal Hill money market funds in order to maintain positive yields on these funds during the low
short-term interest rate environment. During 2017, we have phased out those fee waivers. Waived fees totaled $445 thousand
for 2017, compared to $6.8 million for 2016. The decrease in fee waivers was primarily related to increased interest rates as a
result of four Federal Reserve federal funds rate increases beginning in the fourth quarter of 2016.
32
A distribution of assets under management or administration and related fiduciary and asset management revenue follows:
Table 4 -- Assets Under Management or Administration
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
Balance
Revenue1 Margin2
Balance
Revenue1 Margin2
Managed fiduciary assets:
Personal
Institutional
Total managed fiduciary assets
20,994,937
106,958
0.51% 18,686,274
$ 7,801,968
$
85,328
1.09% $ 7,040,121
$
75,290
13,192,969
21,630
0.16% 11,646,153
18,018
93,308
Non-managed assets:
Fiduciary
Non-fiduciary
Safekeeping and brokerage assets under
administration
Total non-managed assets
27,766,540
16,969,222
53,515
2,420
0.19% 23,691,780
0.01% 17,636,113
40,014
2,155
16,097,098
60,832,860
—
—% 15,393,696
—
55,935
0.09% 56,721,589
42,169
1.07%
0.15%
0.50%
0.17%
0.01%
—%
0.07%
Total assets under management or administration
1 Fiduciary and asset management revenue includes asset-based and other fees associated with the assets.
2 Revenue divided by period-end balance.
$ 81,827,797
$ 162,893
0.20% $ 75,407,863
$ 135,477
0.18%
A summary of changes in assets under management or administration for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 follows:
Table 5 -- Changes in Assets Under Management or Administration
Beginning balance
Net inflows (outflows)
Change in assets from acquisitions
Net change in fair value
Ending balance
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
2016
$
75,407,863
$
71,047,773
(406,469)
1,716,596
—
296,627
6,826,403
2,346,867
$
81,827,797
$
75,407,863
Deposit service charges and fees increased $576 thousand or 1% over 2016. Commercial account service charge revenue
totaled $46.8 million, an increase of $1.8 million or 4% over the prior year. Overdraft fees totaled $38.5 million for 2017, a
decrease of $2.0 million or 5% compared to last year. Service charges on deposit accounts with a standard monthly fee were
$6.9 million, an increase of $196 thousand or 3% over the prior year. Revenue from interchange fees paid by merchants for
transactions processed from debit cards issued to the Company's depositors totaled $19.8 million, an increase of $519 thousand
or 3% over 2016 due to increased transaction volume.
Mortgage banking revenue totaled $104.7 million for 2017, a $29.2 million or 22% decrease compared to 2016.
Mortgage production revenue totaled $38.5 million, a $31.1 million or 45% decrease compared to 2016. Mortgage loan
production volume decreased $2.6 billion, including a $1.8 billion decrease related to the Company's strategic decision to exit
the correspondent lending channel during 2016. Production volumes in the retail channel decreased compared to the prior year
as average primary interest rates were up 34 basis points compared to 2016. Mortgage servicing revenue was $66.2 million, a
$1.9 million or 3% increase over the prior year. The outstanding principal balance of mortgage loans serviced for others totaled
$22.0 billion at December 31, 2017, a $49.1 million increase over December 31, 2016.
33
Table 6 – Mortgage Banking Revenue
(In thousands)
Mortgage production revenue
$
38,498
$
69,628
$
69,587
$
61,061
$
79,545
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Year Ended December 31,
Mortgage loans funded for sale
$ 3,286,873
$ 6,117,417
$ 6,372,956
$ 4,484,394
$ 4,081,390
Add: Current year end outstanding commitments
Less: Prior year end outstanding commitments
222,919
318,359
318,359
601,147
601,147
627,505
627,505
258,873
258,873
356,634
Total mortgage production volume
3,191,433
5,834,629
6,346,598
4,853,026
3,983,629
Gain on sale margin
1.21%
1.19%
1.10%
1.26%
2.00%
Mortgage loan refinances to mortgage loans funded
for sale
Primary mortgage interest rates:
40%
51%
42%
30%
43%
Average
Period end
3.99%
3.99%
3.65%
4.32%
3.85%
3.96%
4.17%
3.83%
3.98%
4.48%
Mortgage servicing revenue
$
66,221
$
64,286
$
56,415
$
48,032
$
42,389
Average outstanding principal balance of mortgage
loans serviced for others
22,055,002
20,837,897
17,920,557
14,940,915
12,850,283
Average mortgage servicing fee rates
0.30%
0.31%
0.31%
0.32%
0.33%
Primary rates disclosed in Table 6 above represent rates generally available to borrowers on 30 year conforming mortgage
loans.
Net gains on securities, derivatives and other assets
We recognized $4.4 million of net gains from sales of $1.3 billion of available for sale securities in 2017. We recognized $11.7
million of net gains from sales of $899 million of available for sale securities in 2016. Securities were sold either because they
had reached their expected maximum potential or to move into securities that are expected to perform better in the current rate
environment.
As discussed in the Market Risk section following, the fair value of our mortgage servicing rights ("MSRs") changes in
response to changes in primary mortgage loan rates and other assumptions. We attempt to mitigate the earnings volatility
caused by changes in the fair value of MSRs by designating certain financial instruments as an economic hedge. Changes in the
fair value of these instruments are generally expected to partially offset changes in the fair value of MSRs.
The net economic benefit of the changes in fair value of mortgage servicing rights and related economic hedges was $6.6
million in the 2017, including a $172 thousand increase in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, offset by a $2.1 million
decrease in the fair value of securities and derivative contracts held as an economic hedge and $8.4 million of related net
interest revenue.
The net economic cost of changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights and related economic hedges was $24.1 million
for 2016. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights decreased $2.2 million.The fair value of securities and interest rate
derivative contracts held as an economic hedge decreased $26.3 million. Our economic hedges were generally designed to be
effective over a + / - 50 basis point rate change. An 85 basis point increase in the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate in the fourth
quarter of 2016 led to a $39.8 million increase in the fair value of MSRs and a $56.8 million decrease in the fair value of
economic hedges. Net interest earned on securities held as an economic hedge was $4.4 million.
34
Table 7 – Gain (Loss) on Mortgage Servicing Rights, Net of Economic Hedge
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
Gain (loss) on mortgage hedge derivative contracts, net
$
681
$ (15,696) $
634
$
2,776
$
(5,080)
Gain (loss) on fair value option securities, net
Gain (loss) on economic hedge of mortgage servicing rights
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights
Gain (loss) on changes in fair value of mortgage servicing rights, net of
economic hedges included in other operating revenue
Net interest revenue on fair value option securities1
Total economic benefit (cost) of changes in the fair value of mortgage
servicing rights, net of economic hedges
(2,733)
(2,052)
172
(10,555)
(26,251)
(2,193)
(1,880)
(28,444)
8,435
4,356
(3,684)
(3,050)
(4,853)
(7,903)
8,001
10,003
12,779
(15,436)
(20,516)
(16,445)
22,720
(3,666)
3,253
2,204
3,290
$
6,555
$ (24,088) $
98
$
(413) $
5,494
1 Actual interest earned on fair value option securities less internal transfer-priced cost of funds.
Other gains, net totaled $9.0 million for 2017, mainly due to the sale of certain merchant banking investments during the year.
Other gains, net totaled $4.0 million for 2016.
Fourth Quarter 2017 Other Operating Revenue
Other operating revenue was $166.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2017, up $1.1 million over the fourth quarter of 2016,
excluding the impact of the unexpected change in interest rates in the fourth quarter of 2016. The fourth quarter of 2016
included a $5.0 million decrease in the net fair value of trading portfolio positions and a $17 million decrease in the fair value
of mortgage servicing rights, net of economic hedges.
Fiduciary and asset management revenue increased $7.2 million over the fourth quarter of 2016 to $41.8 million primarily due
to growth in assets under management and a decrease in waived administrative fees. There were no waived administration fees
on the Cavanal Hill money market funds for the fourth quarter of 2017, compared to $1.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2016.
Mortgage banking revenue was $24.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2017, a decrease of $4.1 million compared to the fourth
quarter of 2016 due primarily to a decrease in mortgage loan production volume. Mortgage loan production volumes were $729
million for the fourth quarter of 2017, compared to $878 million in the fourth quarter of 2016.
All other revenue categories were relatively unchanged.
2016 Other Operating Revenue
Other operating revenue totaled $674.0 million for 2016, up $15.5 million or 2% over 2015. Fees and commissions revenue
increased $36.1 million. The change in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, net of economic hedges, decreased operating
revenue in 2016 by $28.4 million and decreased operating revenue $7.9 million in 2015.
Brokerage and trading revenue for 2016 increased $8.8 million compared to 2015 largely due to customer hedging. Transaction
card revenue grew by $6.9 million over 2015 primarily due to growth in transaction volumes. Fiduciary and asset management
fees increased $9.3 million primarily due to decreased fee waivers and growth in assets under management. Deposit service
charges and fees increased $2.0 million. Increased commercial account service charges were offset by lower overdraft fees and
service charges on deposit accounts with a standard monthly fee.
Mortgage banking revenue grew by $7.9 million over 2015 mainly due to the increase in mortgage servicing revenue. An
increase in gain on sale margins was mostly offset by a decrease in mortgage loan production volume.
Net gains on other assets totaled $4.0 million for 2016. The Company recognized $2.0 million related to the mutual termination
of a rent guarantee between the Company and the City of Tulsa for office space in a building immediately adjacent to the
Company's main office rented by third party tenants. The Company also recognized a $2.1 million gain on the sale of a
merchant banking investment during the year.
35
Other Operating Expense
Other operating expense for 2017 totaled $1.0 billion, a $7.9 million or 1% increase over the prior year. Personnel expense
increased $20.3 million or 4%. Non-personnel expenses decreased $12.4 million or 3% compared to the prior year.
Table 8 – Other Operating Expense
(In thousands)
Regular compensation
Incentive compensation:
Cash-based compensation
Share-based compensation
Deferred compensation
Total incentive compensation
Employee benefits
Total personnel expense
Business promotion
Charitable contributions to BOKF Foundation
Professional fees and services
Net occupancy and equipment
Insurance
Data processing & communications
Printing, postage and supplies
Net losses & operating expenses of repossessed assets
Amortization of intangible assets
Mortgage banking costs
Other expense
Total other operating expense
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
$
333,226
$
332,740
$
313,403
$
298,420
$
279,493
127,964
128,077
23,602
4,091
155,657
84,525
573,408
28,877
2,000
51,067
86,477
19,653
146,970
15,689
9,687
6,779
52,856
32,054
10,464
1,687
140,228
80,151
553,119
26,582
2,000
56,783
80,024
32,489
131,841
15,584
3,359
6,862
61,387
47,560
114,305
12,358
361
127,024
74,871
515,298
27,851
796
40,123
76,016
20,375
122,383
13,498
1,446
4,359
38,813
35,233
111,748
10,875
(13,692)
108,931
69,580
476,931
26,649
4,267
44,440
77,232
18,578
115,225
13,518
6,019
3,965
31,705
28,993
110,871
8,189
32,083
151,143
74,589
505,225
22,598
2,062
32,552
69,773
16,122
105,967
13,885
5,160
3,428
31,196
32,652
$ 1,025,517
$ 1,017,590
$
896,191
$
847,522
$
840,620
Average number of employees (full-time equivalent)
4,900
4,872
4,797
4,679
4,683
Personnel expense
Regular compensation expense, which consists of salaries and wages, overtime pay and temporary personnel costs, increased
$486 thousand, largely unchanged compared to 2016. Standard annual merit increases were offset by the impact of $5.0 million
in severance costs in 2016 related to a reduction of workforce to better align expenses with expected revenue growth. Standard
annual merit increases were effective for the majority of our staff on March 1. The average number of employees remained
consistent compared to the prior year.
Incentive compensation increased $15.4 million or 11% over 2016. Cash-based incentive compensation plans are either
intended to provide current rewards to employees who generate long-term business opportunities for the Company based on
growth in loans, deposits, customer relationships and other measurable metrics or intended to compensate employees with
commissions on completed transactions. Total cash-based incentive compensation decreased $113 thousand compared to 2016.
Share-based compensation expense represents expense for equity awards based on the grant-date fair value. Non-vested shares
generally cliff vest in 3 years and are subject to a two year holding period after vesting. The number of shares that will
ultimately vest is determined by BOKF's change in earnings per share relative to a defined group of peer banks. In addition,
compensation costs related to certain shares is variable based on changes in the fair value of BOK Financial common shares.
Share-based compensation expense for equity awards increased $13.1 million or 126% over 2016 primarily due to the increase
in the vesting probability of certain performance-based share awards and the increase in the fair value of BOK Financial
common shares. The BOK Financial market closing price was $92.32 at December 31, 2017 compared to $83.04 at December
31. 2016.
36
The Company currently offers a deferred compensation plan for certain executive and senior officers. Deferred compensation
expense totaled $4.1 million for 2017, a $2.4 million increase over the prior year. Deferred compensation expense is largely
offset by changes in the fair value of assets held in rabbi trusts for the benefit of participants, which is included other income in
the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Employee benefit expense increased $4.4 million or 5% compared to 2016 primarily due to increased employee medical costs.
The Company self-insures a portion of its employee health care coverage, up to a stop-loss of $750 thousand per employee, and
these costs may be volatile.
Non-personnel operating expense
Non-personnel expense decreased $12.4 million or 3% compared to the prior year.
Insurance expense decreased $12.8 million or 40%. The company received $5.1 million in credits during the second quarter of
2017 related to the revision of certain inputs to the assessment calculation filed for years 2013 through 2016. In conjunction
with ongoing cost reduction efforts, management performed a comprehensive review of inputs into the deposit insurance
assessment calculation. We were able to support eligibility for the custodial bank adjustment, which allows for the deduction of
certain qualifying low-risk assets from the deposit insurance assessment base for depository institutions with greater than $50
billion in trust assets. The remaining decrease was primarily due to the benefit of decreased criticized and classified assets
levels related to the stabilization of energy prices, partially offset by the full-year impact of a new surcharge for banks with
more than $10 billion in assets that became effective in the third quarter of 2016.
Mortgage banking expense decreased $8.5 million or 14%. Mortgage banking expense decreased $7.2 million due to the effect
of actual residential mortgage loan prepayments on the fair value of mortgage servicing rights. As mortgage interest rates rise,
actual prepayment speeds slow.
Professional fees and services expense decreased $5.7 million or 10% largely due to Mobank integration costs incurred last
year. Data processing and communications expense increased $15.1 million or 11% and net occupancy and equipment expense
increased $6.5 million or 8%. These increases were primarily related to continued upgrades of our information technology
infrastructure and cybersecurity.
Net losses and operating expenses of repossessed assets increased $6.3 million over the prior year mainly due to a $6.0 million
write-down of a set of oil and gas properties.
Other expense decreased $15.5 million compared to the prior year. The prior year included $9.1 million of litigation and
settlement expenses.
Fourth Quarter 2017 Operating Expenses
Other operating expense for the fourth quarter of 2017 totaled $264.0 million, a decrease of $1.6 million compared to the fourth
quarter of 2016.
Personnel expense increased $4.2 million over the fourth quarter of 2016. Regular compensation expense decreased $4.5
million compared to the fourth quarter of 2016 due primarily to $5.0 million in severance costs in the fourth quarter of 2016.
Incentive compensation increased $6.5 million over the fourth quarter of 2016. Cash-based compensation was up $2.3 million
and share-based compensation expense increased $3.3 million.
Non-personnel expense decreased $5.8 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. Mortgage banking costs decreased $3.0
million primarily due to the effect of actual residential mortgage loan prepayments on the fair value of mortgage servicing
rights. Insurance expense decreased $2.2 million primarily due to the effect of certain changes in the assessment calculation.
Data processing and communications costs were up $4.7 million, primarily related to information technology infrastructure and
cybersecurity project costs.We also made a $2.0 million cash contribution to the BOKF Foundation during the fourth quarter of
2017 consistent with prior year.
37
2016 Operating Expenses
Other operating expense totaled $1.0 billion for 2016, a $121.4 million or 14% increase over 2015. Other operating expense
included $9.1 million of litigation and settlement expenses, $7.5 million of integration costs related to the Mobank acquisition
and $5.0 million of severance costs related to the reduction of workforce to better align expenses with expected revenue
growth.
Personnel expense increased $37.8 million or 7%. Regular compensation expense totaled $332.7 million, up $19.3 million
primarily due to the investment in mortgage, wealth management and technology employees. Incentive compensation expense
increased $13.2 million or 10%, mainly due to an increase in cash based incentive compensation led by revenue growth in the
Wealth Management segment. Employee benefit expense increased $5.3 million primarily due to employee medical costs.
Non-personnel expense for 2016 was $83.6 million or 22% higher than 2015. Mortgage banking expense increased $22.6
million primarily related to actual mortgage loan prepayments. Insurance expense increased $12.1 million due to higher deposit
insurance expense related to increased criticized and classified asset levels, overall growth in bank assets, and a new surcharge
for banks with more than $10 billion in assets. Professional fees and services expense increased $16.7 million and data
processing and communications expense increased $9.5 million primarily related to the completion of technology projects.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $182.6 million or 35.2% of net income before taxes for 2017, $106.4 million or 31.4% of net income
before taxes for 2016 and $139.4 million or 32.3% of net income before taxes for 2015. Current year tax expense totaled $156
million in 2017, $118 million in 2016 and $130 million in 2015. Excluding the impact of adjustments for tax reform, income
tax expense would have been $170.9 million or 33.0% of net income before taxes for 2017.
The Tax Reform Act signed into law on December 22, 2017 is complex and extensive. Provisional adjustments to net deferred
tax assets from a decrease in the combined federal and state income tax rate of 38.9% to 25.5% totaled $9.5 million, including
$6.4 million of deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses on available for sale securities. We are not aware of any material
areas where we were not able to determine provisional amounts. However, accounting for income tax effects of the Act is still
in process and provisional adjustments recognized in 2017 may be adjusted as a result of our ongoing evaluation, including
subsequent guidance provided by federal and state taxing authorities and other information as it becomes available.
We have not completed our accounting for the tax effects of the enactment of the Tax Reform Act. Vesting of performance-
based equity awards and other incentive compensation that will be paid to certain officers in 2018 is based on growth in our
diluted earnings per share relative to a defined group of peer banks. We made a reasonable estimate of the effects on our related
deferred tax balances and recognized a provisional amount of $2.2 million as a component of income tax expense to write-off
deferred tax assets related to the compensation of certain executive officers that will no longer be deductible. However,
information needed to complete this accounting includes actual 2017 financial results of peer banks which is not yet available.
In addition, information necessary to make a reasonable estimate of the effect of the Tax Reform Act on the proportional
amortization of our investments in low income housing projects was not available.
The statute of limitations expired on uncertain tax positions during 2015, 2016, and 2017. Excluding the statute expiration,
income tax expense would have been $184.1 million or 35.5% of net income before taxes for 2017, $108.3 million or 32.0% of
net income before taxes for 2016 and $140.9 million or 32.6% of net income before taxes for 2015.
Net deferred tax assets totaled $15 million at December 31, 2017 compared to net deferred tax assets of $29 million at
December 31, 2016. We have evaluated the recoverability of our deferred tax assets based on the generation of future taxable
income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible and determined that no valuation allowance
was required in 2017 and 2016.
Unrecognized tax benefits totaled $18.1 million at December 31, 2017 compared to $15.8 million at December 31, 2016. BOK
Financial operates in numerous jurisdictions, which requires judgment regarding the allocation of income, expense, and
earnings under various laws and regulations of each of these taxing jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction may audit our tax returns
and may take different positions with respect to these allocations.
38
Income tax expense was $54.3 million or 42.9% of net income before taxes for the fourth quarter of 2017 compared to $22.5
million or 31.1% of net income before taxes for the fourth quarter of 2016. Income tax expense as a percentage of net income
before taxes was higher in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to tax reform. Excluding adjustments for the impact of tax
reform, income tax expense would have been $42.7 million or 33.7% of net income before taxes for the fourth quarter of 2017.
Table 9 – Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest revenue
Interest expense
Net interest revenue
Provision for credit losses
Net interest revenue after provision for credit losses
Fees and commissions revenue
Gain (loss) on financial instruments and other assets, net
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights
Other operating revenue
Personnel expense
Other non-personnel expense
Total other operating expense
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
2017
First
Second
Third
Fourth
$
226,390
$
235,181
$
255,413
$
255,767
25,208
201,182
—
29,977
205,204
—
36,961
218,452
—
201,182
205,204
218,452
38,904
216,863
(7,000)
223,863
164,354
177,482
173,451
168,157
4,086
1,856
11,713
(6,943)
2,898
(639)
(7,219)
5,898
170,296
182,252
175,710
166,836
136,425
108,286
244,711
143,744
107,141
250,885
147,910
118,024
265,934
145,329
118,658
263,987
126,767
136,571
128,228
126,712
38,103
88,664
308
47,705
88,866
719
42,438
85,790
141
54,347
72,365
(127)
Net income attributable to shareholders of BOK Financial Corp. shareholders $
88,356
$
88,147
$
85,649
$
72,492
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
Average shares:
Basic
Diluted
$
$
1.35
1.35
$
$
1.35
1.35
$
$
1.31
1.31
$
$
1.11
1.11
64,715,964
64,729,752
64,742,822
64,793,005
64,783,737
64,793,134
64,805,172
64,843,179
39
Table 9 – Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (continued)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest revenue
Interest expense
Net interest revenue
Provision for credit losses
Net interest revenue after provision for credit losses
Fees and commissions revenue
Gain (loss) on financial instruments and other assets, net
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights
Other operating revenue
Personnel expense
Other non-personnel expense
Total other operating expense
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
Average shares:
Basic
Diluted
Net income attributable to shareholders of BOK Financial Corp. shareholders $
42,564
2016
First
Second
Third
Fourth
$
201,796
$
202,267
$
209,317
$
215,737
19,224
182,572
35,000
147,572
163,297
22,105
(27,988)
157,414
133,562
109,008
242,570
62,416
21,428
40,988
(1,576)
$
$
$
0.64
0.64
19,655
182,612
20,000
162,612
180,147
21,678
(16,283)
185,542
139,213
112,172
251,385
96,769
30,497
21,471
187,846
10,000
177,846
181,276
3,707
2,327
187,310
139,212
118,876
258,088
107,068
31,956
66,272
$
75,112
$
471
65,801
835
74,277
21,539
194,198
—
194,198
162,028
(58,025)
39,751
143,754
141,132
124,415
265,547
72,405
22,496
49,909
(117)
50,026
1.00
1.00
$
$
1.13
1.13
$
$
0.76
0.76
$
$
$
$
65,296,541
65,245,887
65,085,392
64,719,018
65,331,425
65,302,926
65,157,841
64,787,728
40
Lines of Business
We operate three principal lines of business: Commercial Banking, Consumer Banking and Wealth Management. Commercial
Banking includes lending, treasury and cash management services and customer risk management products for small
businesses, middle market and larger commercial customers. Commercial banking also includes the TransFund EFT
network. Consumer Banking includes retail lending and deposit services, lending and deposit services to small businesses
served through our consumer branch network and all mortgage banking activities. Wealth Management provides fiduciary
services, private bank services and investment advisory services in all markets. Wealth Management also underwrites state and
municipal securities and engages in brokerage and trading activities.
In addition to our lines of business, we have a Funds Management unit. The primary purpose of this unit is to manage our
overall liquidity needs and interest rate risk. Each line of business borrows funds from and provides funds to the Funds
Management unit as needed to support their operations. Operating results for Funds Management and other include the effect of
interest rate risk positions and risk management activities, securities gains and losses including impairment charges, the
provision for credit losses in excess of net loans charged off, tax planning strategies and certain executive compensation costs
that are not attributed to the lines of business. The Funds Management unit also initially recognizes accruals for loss
contingencies when losses become probable. Actual losses are recognized by the lines of business if the accruals are settled.
We allocate resources and evaluate the performance of our lines of business using the net direct contribution which includes the
allocation of funds, actual net credit losses and capital costs. In addition, we measure the performance of our business lines
after allocations of certain direct expenses and taxes based on statutory rates.
The cost of funds borrowed from the Funds Management unit by the operating lines of business is transfer priced at rates that
approximate market rates for funds with similar interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics. Market rates are generally based
on the applicable LIBOR or interest rate swap rates, adjusted for prepayment risk. This method of transfer-pricing funds that
support assets of the operating lines of business tends to insulate them from interest rate risk.
The value of funds provided by the operating lines of business to the Funds Management unit is also based on rates which
approximate wholesale market rates for funds with similar duration and re-pricing characteristics. Market rates are generally
based on LIBOR or interest rate swap rates. The funds credit formula applied to deposit products with indeterminate maturities
is established based on their re-pricing characteristics reflected in a combination of the short-term LIBOR rate and a moving
average of an intermediate term swap rate, with an appropriate spread applied to both. Shorter duration products are weighted
towards the short term LIBOR rate and longer duration products are weighted towards the intermediate swap rates. The
expected duration ranges from 30 days for certain rate-sensitive deposits to five years.
Economic capital is assigned to the business units by a capital allocation model that reflects management’s assessment of
risk. This model assigns capital based upon credit, operating, interest rate and market risk inherent in our business lines and
recognizes the diversification benefits among the units. The level of assigned economic capital is a combination of the risk
taken by each business line, based on its actual exposures and calibrated to its own loss history where possible. Average
invested capital includes economic capital and amounts we have invested in the lines of business.
As shown in Table 10 following, net income attributable to our lines of business increased $106.8 million or 44% over the prior
year. Net interest revenue grew by $111.6 million over the prior year. Other operating revenue was consistent with the prior
year while other operating expenses decreased $20.0 million. Net charge-offs were down $19.1 million compared to the prior
year.
41
Table 10 – Net Income by Line of Business
(In thousands)
Commercial Banking
Consumer Banking
Wealth Management
Subtotal
Funds Management and other
Total
Commercial Banking
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
265,147
$
210,927
$
199,516
24,444
60,304
349,895
(15,251)
18
32,174
243,119
(10,451)
23,131
29,431
252,078
36,487
$
334,644
$
232,668
$
288,565
Commercial Banking contributed $265.1 million to consolidated net income in 2017, up $54.2 million or 26% over the prior
year. The increased contribution was largely driven by improved loan yields, growth in average balances of loans attributed to
Commercial Banking and lower net charge-offs.
Table 11 – Commercial Banking
(Dollars in thousands)
Net interest revenue from external sources
Net interest expense from internal sources
Total net interest revenue
Net loans charged off (recovered)
Net interest revenue after net loans charged off (recovered)
Fees and commissions revenue
Other gains, net
Other operating revenue
Personnel expense
Non-personnel expense
Other operating expense
Net direct contribution
Gain on financial instruments, net
Gain (loss) on repossessed assets, net
Corporate expense allocations
Income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Average assets
Average loans
Average deposits
Average invested capital
42
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
588,938
$
492,967
$
439,751
(84,290)
504,648
13,881
490,767
198,297
7,813
206,110
115,494
110,840
226,334
(58,781)
434,186
32,959
401,227
193,508
2,013
195,521
112,021
104,430
216,451
(52,313)
387,438
(6,748)
394,186
177,251
478
177,729
108,661
94,143
202,804
470,543
380,297
369,111
52
(2,681)
33,958
433,956
168,809
265,147
17,517,217
14,154,105
8,681,424
1,303,185
$
$
10
669
35,760
345,216
134,289
210,927
16,998,626
13,600,221
8,430,507
1,212,429
$
$
—
708
43,279
326,540
127,024
199,516
16,284,527
12,404,064
8,773,512
1,037,510
$
$
Net interest revenue increased $70.5 million or 16% over 2016. Growth in net interest revenue was due to improved yields and
a $554 million increase in average loan balances as discussed further in the Loans section of Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition. Commercial and commercial real estate loans are primarily attributed to the Commercial
Banking segment.
Average deposits attributed to Commercial Banking were $8.7 billion for 2017, an increase of $251 million or 3% over 2016.
See additional discussion concerning changes in Commercial Banking deposits in the Liquidity and Capital section of
Management's Discussion and Analysis following.
Fees and commissions revenue increased $4.8 million or 3% over 2016. Transaction card revenue generated by the TransFund
EFT network increased $3.8 million or 3% largely due to a $2.1 million customer early termination fee received in 2017.
Commercial deposit service charges and fees increased $2.0 million or 5% partially offset by a decrease in Other revenue of
$1.4 million or 5% .
Other gains, net, of $7.8 million for 2017 was primarily due to a gain on sale of certain merchant banking investments.
Operating expense increased $9.9 million or 5% over 2016. Personnel costs increased $3.5 million or 3% primarily due to an
increase in incentive compensation expense. Non-personnel expense increased $6.4 million or 6% over the prior year. Deposit
insurance expense increased $6.2 million mainly due to increased granularity in allocation to the segments. Net repossession
expense increased $4.4 million primarily due to the revaluation of certain oil and gas properties. Professional fees and services
increased $1.6 million, data processing and communications expense increased $1.5 million and equipment expense increased
$1.5 million primarily due to the implementation of projects. Other expense was down $9.6 million compared to the prior year
primarily due to litigation settlements and post-acquisition valuation adjustments to a consolidated merchant banking
investment that occurred in 2016. Corporate expense allocations decreased $1.8 million compared to the prior year.
43
Consumer Banking
Consumer Banking services are provided through four primary distribution channels: traditional branches, the 24-hour
ExpressBank call center, Internet banking and mobile banking. Consumer Banking also conducts mortgage banking activities
through offices located outside of our consumer banking markets and through HomeDirect Mortgage, an online origination
channel.
Net income attributed to Consumer Banking totaled $24.4 million for 2017, compared to $18 thousand in the prior year.
Changes in the fair value of our mortgage servicing rights, net of economic hedge, resulted in a $1.9 million decrease to pre-tax
net income for 2017 compared to a $28.4 million decrease to pre-tax net income in 2016.
Table 12 – Consumer Banking
(Dollars in thousands)
Net interest revenue from external sources
Net interest revenue from internal sources
Total net interest revenue
Net loans charged off
Net interest revenue after net loans charged off
Fees and commissions revenue
Other losses, net
Other operating revenue
Personnel expense
Other non-personnel expense
Total other operating expense
Net direct contribution
Loss on financial instruments, net
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights
Gain on repossessed assets, net
Corporate allocations
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Average assets
Average loans
Average deposits
Average invested capital
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
96,360
$
85,998
$
47,218
143,578
4,783
138,795
196,299
(68)
196,231
101,653
122,670
224,323
110,703
(3,331)
172
223
67,761
40,006
15,562
24,444
8,956,713
1,954,561
6,654,631
321,706
$
$
37,777
123,775
4,927
118,848
224,980
(178)
224,802
103,034
146,710
249,744
93,906
(26,252)
(2,193)
979
66,411
29
11
18
8,722,372
1,893,375
6,632,687
316,680
$
$
$
$
84,848
28,503
113,351
6,934
106,417
218,859
(764)
218,095
96,604
106,466
203,070
121,442
(4,712)
(4,853)
916
74,936
37,857
14,726
23,131
8,836,327
1,900,768
6,668,520
296,880
Net interest revenue from Consumer Banking activities grew by $19.8 million or 16% over 2016, primarily related to increased
yields on deposit balances sold to the Funds Management unit. Average loans increased $61 million and average deposits
increased $22 million. Net loans charged off by the Consumer Banking unit were largely unchanged compared 2016 at $4.8
million. Net consumer banking charge-offs include overdrawn deposit accounts and other consumer loans.
44
Fees and commissions revenue decreased $28.7 million or 13% compared to the prior year. Mortgage banking revenue was
down $29.1 million or 22% compared the prior year. Mortgage loan production volumes decreased $2.6 billion compared to
2016, largely due to the strategic decision to exit the correspondent lending channel. Gain on sale margin remained relatively
stable, increasing 2 basis points. Deposit service charges and fees decreased $1.3 million or 2% compared to the prior year
primarily due to lower overdraft fees.
Operating expense decreased $25.4 million or 10% compared to 2016. Personnel expense was down $1.4 million or 1%,
primarily due to incentive compensation expense as mortgage production volume is down. Non-personnel expense decreased
$24.0 million or 16%. Mortgage banking costs were down $8.6 million compared to the prior year. Mortgage banking expense
decreased $7.2 million due to the effect of actual residential mortgage loan prepayments on the fair value of mortgage servicing
rights. Other expense was down $11.0 million due to $11.1 million of litigation and settlement costs that occurred in 2016.
Decreases in professional fees and services of $3.7 million and insurance of $1.8 million were partially offset by an increase in
data processing and communications expense of $1.1 million.
45
Wealth Management
Wealth Management contributed $60.3 million to consolidated net income in 2017, up $28.1 million or 87% over the prior year.
This increase was driven by growth in both net interest revenue and fees and commissions revenue combined with lower
operating expenses.
Table 13 – Wealth Management
(Dollars in thousands)
Net interest revenue from external sources
Net interest revenue from internal sources
Total net interest revenue
Net loans charged off (recovered)
Net interest revenue after net loans charged off (recovered)
Fees and commissions revenue
Other gains (losses), net
Other operating revenue
Personnel expense
Other non-personnel expense
Other operating expense
Net direct contribution
Loss on financial instruments, net
Gain (loss) on repossessed assets, net
Corporate allocations
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income tax
Net income
Average assets
Average loans
Average deposits
Average invested capital
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
45,024
$
33,006
$
38,344
83,368
(696)
84,064
29,043
62,049
(801)
62,850
24,744
24,043
48,787
(1,083)
49,870
301,485
282,710
266,790
(51)
512
733
301,434
283,222
267,523
183,727
62,899
246,626
190,756
60,238
250,994
178,333
50,331
228,664
138,872
95,078
88,729
—
387
40,562
98,697
38,393
(42)
—
42,378
52,658
20,484
(204)
—
40,357
48,168
18,737
60,304
$
32,174
$
29,431
7,072,622
$
6,281,127
$
5,444,483
1,314,441
5,516,214
233,762
1,132,966
4,867,293
199,227
1,068,638
4,573,710
186,382
$
$
Net interest revenue increased $21.3 million or 34% over the prior year driven by loan growth and net interest margin
expansion. Also, expansion of trading in mortgage-related financial instruments increased revenue by $9.2 million in 2017
compared to 2016. Average deposit balances increased $649 million or 13% over the prior year and average loan balances were
up $181 million or 16%.
Fees and commissions revenue grew by $18.8 million or 7% over the prior year. Fiduciary and asset management revenue
increased $27.4 million or 20% primarily related to increases in assets under management, improved pricing discipline and
decreased fee waivers. Brokerage and trading revenue decreased $14.0 million compared to the prior year, excluding the
previously noted $5.0 million effect of the unexpected increase in interest rates in the fourth quarter of 2016. The revenue
decrease is primarily due to the effect of rising interest rates on customer activity and implementation of the DOL fiduciary rule
in 2017.
46
Toward the end of 2016, we deepened our relationship with existing mortgage loan originator clients who hedge their
production pipeline risk with us. We began buying U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities from these customers
as part of our trading activities. This expanded product set contributed to both net interest revenue and institutional trading
revenue in 2017.
Other operating revenue includes fees earned from state and municipal bond underwriting and financial advisory services,
primarily in the Oklahoma and Texas markets. In 2017, the Wealth Management division participated in 279 underwritings that
totaled $8.3 billion. As a participant, the Wealth Management division was responsible for facilitating the sale of approximately
$2.0 billion of these underwritings. The Wealth Management division also participated in 24 corporate debt underwritings
during 2017 that totaled $11.6 billion. Our interest in these underwritings was $274 million. In 2016, the Wealth Management
division participated in 417 underwritings that totaled approximately $17.8 billion. Our interest in these underwritings totaled
approximately $2.7 billion. The Wealth Management division also participated in 24 corporate debt underwritings during 2016
that totaled $9.5 billion. Our interest in these underwritings was $223 million.
Operating expenses decreased $4.4 million or 2% compared to the prior year. Personnel expense decreased $7.0 million or 4%,
primarily due to a $5.3 million decrease in incentive compensation expense. Non-personnel expense was up $2.7 million or 4%
over 2016. Data processing and communications expense increased $5.9 million over 2016 due to continued technology
upgrades along with increases due to the growth in trust accounts and price increases from certain vendors. This increase was
offset by decreases in professional fees and services, insurance and other expense.
47
Financial Condition
Securities
We maintain a securities portfolio to enhance profitability, manage interest rate risk, provide liquidity and comply with
regulatory requirements. Securities are classified as trading, held for investment, or available for sale.
Table 14 – Securities
(In thousands)
Trading:
U.S. government agency debentures
U.S. government agency residential
mortgage-backed securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
Asset-backed securities
Other trading securities
Total trading securities
Investment:
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
U.S. government agency residential
mortgage-backed securities
Other debt securities
Total investment securities
Available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
2017
December 31,
2016
2015
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
$
21,188
$
21,196
$
6,238
$
6,234
$
61,366
$
61,295
393,190
13,476
23,911
11,359
463,124
$
392,673
13,559
23,885
11,363
462,676
$
309,432
14,377
—
6,843
336,890
$
310,067
14,427
—
6,900
337,628
$
10,972
31,691
—
18,235
122,264
$
10,989
31,901
—
18,219
122,404
228,186
$
230,349
$
320,364
321,225
$
365,258
$
368,910
15,891
217,716
461,793
1,000
27,182
$
$
16,242
233,444
480,035
1,000
27,080
$
$
20,777
205,004
546,145
1,000
41,050
$
$
21,473
222,795
565,493
999
40,993
$
$
26,833
205,745
597,836
1,000
56,681
$
$
27,874
232,375
629,159
995
56,817
$
$
$
$
U.S. government agencies
Private issue
5,355,148
74,311
5,309,152
93,221
5,475,351
101,192
5,460,386
115,535
5,861,096
128,111
5,898,351
139,118
Total residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
guaranteed by U.S. government
agencies
Other debt securities
Perpetual preferred stock
Equity securities and mutual funds
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities:
U.S. government agency residential
mortgage-backed securities
5,429,459
5,402,373
5,576,543
5,575,921
5,989,207
6,037,469
2,858,885
25,500
12,562
14,487
$ 8,369,075
2,834,961
25,481
15,767
14,916
$ 8,321,578
3,035,750
4,400
15,561
17,424
$ 8,691,728
3,017,933
4,152
18,474
18,357
$ 8,676,829
2,919,044
4,400
17,171
17,121
$ 9,004,624
2,905,796
4,151
19,672
17,833
$ 9,042,733
$
756,931
$
755,054
$
78,823
$
77,046
$
446,277
$
444,217
We maintain an inventory of trading securities in support of sales to a variety of customers, including banks, corporations,
insurance companies, money managers and others. Trading securities increased toward the end of 2016 in response to expanded
relationships with mortgage loan originator clients. As discussed in the Market Risk section of this report, trading activities
involve risk of loss from adverse price movement. We mitigate this risk within board-approved limits through the use of
derivative contracts, short-sales and other techniques. These limits remain unchanged from levels set before our expanded
trading activities.
48
Investment securities consist primarily of intermediate and long-term, fixed rate Oklahoma and Texas municipal bonds and
taxable Texas school construction bonds. The investment security portfolio is diversified among issuers. The largest obligation
of any single issuer is $30 million. Substantially all of these bonds are general obligations of the issuers. Approximately $99
million of the Texas school construction bonds are also guaranteed by the Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program
supervised by the State Board of Education for the State of Texas.
Available for sale securities, which may be sold prior to maturity, are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses, net of
deferred taxes, are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. The amortized cost of
available for sale securities totaled $8.4 billion at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $323 million compared to December 31,
2016. Available for sale securities consist primarily of U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities and U.S.
government agency commercial mortgage-backed securities. Both residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities have
credit risk from delinquency or default of the underlying loans. We mitigate this risk by primarily investing in securities issued
by U.S. government agencies. Principal and interest payments on the underlying loans are fully guaranteed. Commercial
mortgage-backed securities have prepayment penalties similar to commercial loans. At December 31, 2017, residential
mortgage-backed securities represented 65% of total available for sale securities.
A primary risk of holding residential mortgage-backed securities comes from extension during periods of rising interest rates or
prepayment during periods of falling interest rates. We evaluate this risk through extensive modeling of risk both before making
an investment and throughout the life of the security. Our best estimate of the duration of the combined residential mortgage-
backed securities portfolio held in investment and available for sale securities portfolios at December 31, 2017 is 3.3
years. Management estimates the combined portfolios' duration extends to 4.1 years assuming an immediate 200 basis point
upward shock. The estimated duration contracts to 2.9 years assuming a 50 basis point decline in the current low rate
environment.
The aggregate gross amount of unrealized losses on available for sale securities totaled $89 million at December 31, 2017, a
$14 million increase compared to December 31, 2016. On a quarterly basis, we perform separate evaluations on debt and equity
securities to determine if the unrealized losses are temporary as more fully described in Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements. No other-than-temporary impairment charges were recognized in earnings in 2017.
Certain residential mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government agencies and included in Fair value option securities
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, have been segregated and designated as economic hedges of changes in the fair value of
our mortgage servicing rights. We have elected to carry these securities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in
current period income. These securities are held with the intent that gains or losses will offset changes in the fair value of
mortgage servicing rights and related derivative contracts.
We are required to hold stock as members of the Federal Reserve system and the Federal Home Loan Banks ("FHLB"). These
restricted equity securities are carried at cost as these securities do not have a readily determined fair value because ownership
of these shares are restricted and they lack a market. We are required to hold FHLB stock in proportion to our borrowings with
the FHLB.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
We have approximately $316 million of bank-owned life insurance at December 31, 2017. This investment is expected to
provide a long-term source of earnings to support existing employee benefit programs. Approximately $288 million is held in
separate accounts. Our separate account holdings are invested in diversified portfolios of investment-grade fixed income
securities and cash equivalents, including U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, residential mortgage-backed securities,
corporate debt, asset-backed and commercial mortgage-backed securities. The portfolios are managed by unaffiliated
professional managers within parameters established in the portfolio’s investment guidelines. The cash surrender value of
certain life insurance policies is further supported by a stable value wrap, which protects against changes in the fair value of the
investments. At December 31, 2017, the fair value of investments held in separate accounts was approximately $293
million. As the underlying fair value of the investments held in a separate account at December 31, 2017 exceeded the net book
value of the investments, no cash surrender value was supported by the stable value wrap. The stable value wrap is provided by
a domestic financial institution. The remaining cash surrender value of $28 million primarily represents the cash surrender
value of policies held in general accounts and other amounts due from various insurance companies.
49
Loans
The aggregate loan portfolio before allowance for loan losses totaled $17.2 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $164
million or 1% over December 31, 2016. Commercial loans have grown by $343 million or 3% due largely to growth in energy
and healthcare, partially offset by a decrease in services and wholesale/retail sector loan balances. Commercial real estate loans
decreased $329 million or 9% due primarily to continued pay-down activity as borrowers took advantage of favorable long-
term rates and refinanced into the permanent market. Residential mortgage loans increased $24 million and personal loans grew
by $126 million.
Table 15 – Loans
(In thousands)
Commercial:
Services
Energy
Healthcare
Wholesale/retail
Manufacturing
Other commercial and industrial
Total commercial
Commercial real estate:
Multifamily
Office
Retail
Industrial
Residential construction and land development
Other commercial real estate
Total commercial real estate
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage
Permanent mortgages guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Home equity
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
December 31,
$
2,986,949
$
3,108,990
$
2,784,276
$
2,391,530
$
2,282,210
2,930,156
2,314,753
1,471,256
496,774
534,087
2,497,868
2,201,916
1,576,818
514,975
490,257
3,097,328
1,883,380
1,422,064
556,729
508,754
2,860,428
1,454,969
1,440,015
532,594
416,134
2,351,760
1,274,246
1,201,364
391,751
441,890
10,733,975
10,390,824
10,252,531
9,095,670
7,943,221
980,017
831,770
691,532
573,014
117,245
286,409
903,272
798,888
761,888
871,749
135,533
337,716
751,085
637,707
796,499
563,169
160,426
350,147
704,298
415,544
666,889
428,817
143,591
369,011
576,502
411,499
586,047
243,877
206,258
391,170
3,479,987
3,809,046
3,259,033
2,728,150
2,415,353
1,043,435
1,006,820
945,336
969,951
1,062,744
197,506
732,745
199,387
743,625
196,937
734,620
205,950
773,611
181,598
807,684
Total residential mortgage
1,973,686
1,949,832
1,876,893
1,949,512
2,052,026
Personal
Total
Commercial
965,776
839,958
552,697
434,705
381,664
$
17,153,424
$ 16,989,660
$
15,941,154
$
14,208,037
$
12,792,264
Commercial loans represent loans for working capital, facilities acquisition or expansion, purchases of equipment and other
needs of commercial customers primarily located within our geographical footprint. Commercial loans are underwritten
individually and represent ongoing relationships based on a thorough knowledge of the customer, the customer’s industry and
market. While commercial loans are generally secured by the customer’s assets including real property, inventory, accounts
receivable, operating equipment, interests in mineral rights and other property and may also include personal guarantees of the
owners and related parties, the primary source of repayment of the loans is the on-going cash flow from operations of the
customer’s business. Inherent lending risks are centrally monitored on a continuous basis from underwriting throughout the life
of the loan for compliance with commercial lending policies.
50
Commercial loans totaled $10.7 billion or 63% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2017, an increase of $343 million or 3%
over December 31, 2016. Energy sector loans grew by $432 million or 17% and healthcare sector loans increased $113 million
or 5% over December 31, 2016. This growth was partially offset by a decrease of $122 million or 4% in services sector loan
balances and $106 million or 7% decrease in wholesale/retail sector loan balances.
Table 16 presents our commercial loan portfolio distributed primarily by collateral location. Loans for which the collateral
location is less relevant, such as unsecured loans and reserve-based energy loans, are distributed by the borrower’s primary
operating location.
Table 16 – Commercial Loans by Collateral Location
(In thousands)
Oklahoma
Texas
New
Mexico
Arkansas Colorado
Arizona
Kansas/
Missouri
Other
Total
$ 708,329
$ 819,272
$169,836
$
12,309
$ 325,692
$244,818
$ 300,118
$ 406,575
$ 2,986,949
533,960
1,543,888
43,439
257,780
275,919
94,045
364,956
130,490
583,115
148,444
42,648
221
3,270
92,541
25,595
4,672
326,132
8,374
68,881
133,506
136,940
267,919
69,179
62,090
69,318
44,348
85,208
77,689
402,212
930,621
320,274
65,265
2,930,156
2,314,753
1,471,256
496,774
81,051
156,676
2,404
70,876
26,617
18,820
81,152
96,491
534,087
Services
Energy
Healthcare
Wholesale/retail
Manufacturing
Other commercial
and industrial
Total commercial
loans
$1,951,084
$3,616,351
$389,038
$ 209,263
$ 943,216
$522,618
$ 880,967
$2,221,438
$10,733,975
The majority of our commercial portfolio is located within our geographic footprint. At December 31, 2017, the Other category
is composed primarily of California totaling $314 million or 3% of the commercial portfolio, Florida totaling $220 million or
2% of the commercial portfolio, Louisiana totaling $162 million or 2% of the commercial portfolio and Pennsylvania totaling
$129 million or 1% of the commercial portfolio. All other states individually represent one percent or less of the total
commercial loan portfolio.
Supporting the energy industry with loans to producers and other energy-related entities has been a hallmark of the Company
since its founding and represents a large portion of our commercial loan portfolio. In addition, energy production and related
industries have a significant impact on the economy in our primary markets. Loans collateralized by oil and gas properties are
subject to a semi-annual engineering review by our internal staff of petroleum engineers. This review is utilized as the basis for
developing the expected cash flows supporting the loan amount. The projected cash flows are discounted according to risk
characteristics of the underlying oil and gas properties. Loans are evaluated to demonstrate with reasonable certainty that crude
oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids can be recovered from known oil and gas reservoirs under existing economic and
operating conditions at current pricing levels and with existing conventional equipment and operating methods and costs. As
part of our evaluation of credit quality, we analyze rigorous stress tests over a range of commodity prices and take proactive
steps to mitigate risk when appropriate.
Outstanding energy loans totaled $2.9 billion or 17% of total loans at December 31, 2017. Unfunded energy loan commitments
increased by $189 million during the year to $2.9 billion at December 31, 2017. Growth in both energy loan balances and
unfunded commitments demonstrates the support for this industry that we maintained during the recent downturn in oil and gas
prices. Total outstanding loan balances as a percentage of total energy loan commitments increased to 52% at December 31,
2017, compared to 50% at December 31, 2016. Approximately $2.5 billion or 85% of energy loans were to oil and gas
producers, a $488 million increase over December 31, 2016. The majority of this portfolio is first lien, senior secured, reserve-
based lending, which we believe is the lowest risk form of energy lending. Approximately 57% of the committed production
loans are secured by properties primarily producing oil and 43% of the committed production loans are secured by properties
primarily producing natural gas. Loans to borrowers in the midstream sector of the industry totaled $261 million or 9% of
energy loans, a decrease of $3.0 million compared to the prior year. Loans to borrowers that provide services to the energy
industry totaled $130 million or 4% of energy loans, a decrease of $56 million during 2017. Loans to other energy borrowers,
including those engaged in wholesale or retail energy sales totaled $61 million or 2% of energy loans, an increase of $2.5
million over the prior year.
51
The services sector of the loan portfolio totaled $3.0 billion or 17% of total loans and consists of a large number of loans to a
variety of businesses, including governmental, educational, commercial services, consumer services and utilities. Loans to
governmental entities totaled $556 million at December 31, 2017. Approximately $1.5 billion of the services category is made
up of loans with individual balances of less than $10 million. Service sector loans are generally secured by the assets of the
borrower with repayment coming from the cash flows of ongoing operations of the customer’s business.
The healthcare sector of the loan portfolio totaled $2.3 billion or 13% of total loans and consists primarily of loans for the
development and operation of senior housing and care facilities, including independent living, assisted living and skilled
nursing. Healthcare also includes loans to hospitals and other medical service providers. Growth in the healthcare sector was
subdued as the whole industry paused to wait for any potential impact from healthcare reform earlier in 2017.
We participate in shared national credits when appropriate to obtain or maintain business relationships with local customers.
Shared national credits are defined by banking regulators as credits of more than $20 million and with three or more non-
affiliated banks as participants. At December 31, 2017, the outstanding principal balance of these loans totaled $4.1 billion.
Approximately 86% of these loans are to borrowers with local market relationships. We serve as the agent lender in
approximately 17% of our shared national credits, based on dollars committed. We hold shared credits to the same standard of
analysis and perform the same level of review as internally originated credits. Our lending policies generally avoid loans in
which we do not have the opportunity to maintain or achieve other business relationships with the customer. In addition to
management’s quarterly assessment of credit risk, banking regulators annually review a sample of shared national credits for
proper risk grading.
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial real estate represents loans for the construction of buildings or other improvements to real estate and property held
by borrowers for investment purposes. The majority of commercial real estate loans are secured by properties within our
geographic footprint, with the larger concentrations in Texas and Oklahoma, which represent 35% and 12% of the total
commercial real estate portfolio at December 31, 2017, respectively. We require collateral values in excess of the loan amounts,
demonstrated cash flows in excess of expected debt service requirements, equity investment in the project and a portion of the
project already sold, leased or permanent financing already secured. The expected cash flows from all significant new or
renewed income producing property commitments are stress tested to reflect the risks in varying interest rates, vacancy rates
and rental rates. As with commercial loans, inherent lending risks are centrally monitored on a continuous basis from
underwriting throughout the life of the loan for compliance with applicable lending policies.
Commercial real estate loans totaled $3.5 billion or 20% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2017. The outstanding balance
of commercial real estate loans decreased $329 million compared to 2016 due primarily to continued pay-down activity as
borrowers took advantage of favorable long-term rates and refinanced into the permanent market and as we neared internal
concentration limits earlier this year. We now have capacity to grow commercial real estate loans, although it will take time
before commitments start to fund. Loans secured by industrial facilities, loans secured by retail facilities and other commercial
real estate loans decreased compared to the prior year, partially offset by growth in loans secured by multifamily residential
properties and office buildings. The commercial real estate loan balance as a percentage of our total loan portfolio has ranged
from 19% to 22% over the past five years. The commercial real estate segment of our loan portfolio distributed by collateral
location follows in Table 17.
52
Table 17 – Commercial Real Estate Loans by Collateral Location
(In thousands)
Oklahoma
Texas
New
Mexico
Arkansas Colorado Arizona
Kansas/
Missouri
Other
Total
Multifamily
$ 112,942
$ 456,018
$ 19,186
$ 27,102
$ 70,959
$ 61,944
$ 113,156
$ 118,710
$
980,017
Office
Retail
Industrial
Residential
construction and
land
development
Other commercial
real estate
Total commercial
real estate loans
92,766
57,350
75,907
278,285
88,309
268,198
113,821
150,459
22,836
7,570
7,660
—
30,766
31,825
13,030
62,738
29,217
10,221
46,082
17,073
44,545
225,254
166,388
256,016
831,770
691,532
573,014
11,900
23,228
17,134
1,809
18,037
7,664
14,638
22,835
117,245
55,939
31,506
12,640
3,504
15,132
21,056
33,111
113,521
286,409
$ 406,804
$1,207,694
$ 273,926
$ 47,645
$ 179,749
$192,840
$ 268,605
$ 902,724
$ 3,479,987
The Other category includes California with $137 million or 4% of total commercial real estate loans and Florida with $103
million or 3% of total commercial real estate loans. All other states individually represent less than 3% of the total commercial
real estate loan population.
While recent changes nationally in consumer purchasing trends from brick-and-mortar store to online has created concern with
regards to retail lending, our credit quality remains very good. The portfolio is highly diversified with no material exposure to a
single borrower or tenant.
Residential Mortgage and Personal
Residential mortgage loans provide funds for our customers to purchase or refinance their primary residence or to borrow
against the equity in their home. Residential mortgage loans are secured by a first or second-mortgage on the customer’s
primary residence. Personal loans consist primarily of loans to wealth management clients secured by the cash surrender value
of insurance policies and marketable securities. It also includes direct loans secured by and for the purchase of automobiles,
recreational and marine equipment as well as unsecured loans. Residential mortgage and personal loans are made in accordance
with underwriting policies we believe to be conservative and are fully documented. Credit scoring is assessed based on
significant credit characteristics including credit history, residential and employment stability.
Residential mortgage loans totaled $2.0 billion, a $24 million or 1% increase compared to December 31, 2016. In general, we
sell the majority of our fixed rate loan originations that conform to U.S. government agency standards in the secondary market
and retain the majority of our non-conforming and adjustable-rate mortgage loans. We have no concentration in sub-prime
residential mortgage loans. Our mortgage loan portfolio does not include payment option adjustable rate mortgage loans or
adjustable rate mortgage loans with initial rates that are below market. Collateral for 95% of our residential mortgage portfolio
is located within our geographic footprint.
The majority of our permanent mortgage loan portfolio is primarily composed of various non-conforming mortgage programs
to support customer relationships including jumbo mortgage loans, non-builder construction loans and special loan programs
for high net worth individuals or certain professionals. Jumbo loans may be fixed or variable rate and are fully amortizing. The
size of jumbo loans exceed maximums set under government sponsored entity standards, but otherwise generally conform to
those standards. These loans generally require a minimum FICO score of 720 and a maximum debt-to-income ratio (“DTI”) of
38%. Loan-to-value ratios (“LTV”) are tiered from 60% to 100%, depending on the market. Special mortgage programs include
fixed and variable rate fully amortizing loans tailored to the needs of certain healthcare professionals. Variable rate loans are
fully indexed at origination and may have fixed rates for three to ten years, then adjust annually thereafter.
At December 31, 2017, $198 million of permanent residential mortgage loans are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. We
have minimal credit exposure on loans guaranteed by the agencies. This amount includes residential mortgage loans previously
sold into GNMA mortgage pools that are eligible to be repurchased. We may repurchase these loans when certain defined
delinquency criteria are met. Because of this repurchase right, the Company is deemed to have regained effective control over
these loans and must include them in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Permanent residential mortgage loans guaranteed by
U.S. government agencies decreased $1.9 million or 1% compared to December 31, 2016.
53
Home equity loans totaled $733 million at December 31, 2017, an $11 million or 1% decrease compared to December 31,
2016. Our home equity portfolio is primarily composed of first-lien, fully amortizing home equity loans. Home equity loans
generally require a minimum FICO score of 700 and a maximum DTI of 50%. The maximum loan amount available for our
home equity loan products is generally $400 thousand. Revolving loans have a 10 year revolving period followed by 15 year
term of amortizing repayments. Interest-only home equity loans have a 5 year revolving period followed by a 15 year term of
amortizing repayments and may not be extended for any additional revolving time. All other home equity loans may be
extended at management's discretion for an additional 5 year revolving term subject to an update of certain credit information.
A summary of our home equity loan portfolio at December 31, 2017 by lien position and amortizing status follows in Table 18.
Table 18 – Home Equity Loans
(In thousands)
First lien
Junior lien
Total home equity
Revolving
Amortizing
Total
$
$
72,649
$
392,807
$
465,456
143,463
123,826
267,289
216,112
$
516,633
$
732,745
Personal loans totaled $966 million, growing by $126 million or 15% over the prior year. This growth is primarily due to loans
to Wealth Management customers for investment in businesses that will be repaid from personal income.
The distribution of residential mortgage and personal loans at December 31, 2017 is presented in Table 19. Residential
mortgage loans are distributed by collateral location. Personal loans are generally distributed by borrower location.
Table 19 – Residential Mortgage and Personal Loans by Collateral Location
(In thousands)
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage
Permanent
mortgages guaranteed
by U.S. government
agencies
Home equity
Total residential
mortgage
Oklahoma
Texas
New
Mexico
Arkansas Colorado Arizona
Kansas/
Missouri
Other
Total
$ 176,303
$429,517
$ 47,635
$ 13,533
$ 177,952
$ 97,364
$ 57,214
$ 43,917
$ 1,043,435
53,056
384,178
35,906
133,280
37,511
92,077
7,387
5,395
5,027
38,166
1,879
9,434
14,241
67,581
42,499
2,634
197,506
732,745
$ 613,537
$598,703
$ 177,223
$ 26,315
$ 221,145
$108,677
$ 139,036
$ 89,050
$ 1,973,686
Personal
$ 300,362
$401,533
$ 11,555
$ 10,118
$ 65,137
$ 48,993
$ 76,289
$ 51,789
$ 965,776
54
The Company secondarily evaluates loan portfolio performance based on the primary geographical market managing the loan.
Loans attributed to a geographical market may not represent the location of the borrower or the collateral. All permanent
mortgage loans serviced by our mortgage banking unit and held for investment by BOKF, NA are centrally managed by the
Bank of Oklahoma division.
Table 20 – Loans Managed by Primary Geographical Market
(In thousands)
Bank of Oklahoma:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total Bank of Oklahoma
Bank of Texas:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total Bank of Texas
Bank of Albuquerque:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total Bank of Albuquerque
Bank of Arkansas:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total Bank of Arkansas
Colorado State Bank & Trust:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total Colorado State Bank & Trust
Bank of Arizona:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total Bank of Arizona
Mobank (Kansas City):
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total Mobank (Kansas City)
$
2017
2016
December 31,
2015
2014
2013
$
3,238,720
682,037
1,435,432
342,212
5,698,401
4,520,401
1,261,864
233,675
375,084
6,391,024
343,296
341,282
98,018
11,721
794,317
95,644
87,393
6,596
9,992
199,625
1,130,714
174,201
63,350
63,115
1,431,380
687,792
660,094
41,771
57,140
1,446,797
717,408
273,116
94,844
106,512
1,191,880
$
3,370,259
684,381
1,407,197
303,823
5,765,660
4,022,455
1,415,011
233,981
306,748
5,978,195
399,256
284,603
108,058
11,483
803,400
86,577
73,616
7,015
6,524
173,732
1,018,208
265,264
59,631
50,372
1,393,475
686,253
747,409
36,265
52,553
1,522,480
807,816
338,762
97,685
108,455
1,352,718
$
3,782,687
739,829
1,409,114
255,387
6,187,017
3,908,425
1,204,202
219,126
203,496
5,535,249
375,839
313,422
120,507
11,557
821,325
92,359
69,320
8,169
819
170,667
987,076
223,946
53,782
23,384
1,288,188
606,733
507,523
44,047
31,060
1,189,363
499,412
200,791
22,148
26,994
749,345
$
3,142,689
603,610
1,467,096
206,115
5,419,510
3,549,128
1,027,817
235,948
154,363
4,967,256
383,439
296,358
127,999
10,899
818,695
95,510
88,301
7,261
5,169
196,241
977,961
194,553
57,119
27,918
1,257,551
547,524
355,140
35,872
12,883
951,419
399,419
162,371
18,217
17,358
597,365
2,902,140
602,010
1,524,212
192,283
5,220,645
3,052,274
816,574
260,544
131,297
4,260,689
342,336
308,829
133,900
13,842
798,907
81,556
78,264
7,922
8,023
175,765
735,626
190,355
62,821
22,686
1,011,488
417,702
257,477
47,111
7,887
730,177
411,587
161,844
15,516
5,646
594,593
Total BOK Financial loans
$
17,153,424
$ 16,989,660
$
15,941,154
$
14,208,037
$
12,792,264
55
Table 21 – Loan Maturity and Interest Rate Sensitivity at December 31, 2017
(In thousands)
Loan maturity:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Total
Interest rate sensitivity for selected loans with:
Predetermined interest rates
Floating or adjustable interest rates
Total
Loan Commitments
Remaining Maturities of Selected Loans
Total
Within 1
Year
1-5 Years
After 5
Years
$ 10,733,975
3,479,987
$ 14,213,962
$
2,734,269
$
$
$
882,438
$
5,965,679
243,751
1,126,189
44,414
2,290,818
8,256,497
653,321
$
$
$
$
$
11,479,693
1,081,775
7,603,177
3,885,858
945,418
4,831,276
2,036,534
2,794,741
$ 14,213,962
$
1,126,189
$
8,256,498
$
4,831,275
We enter into certain off-balance sheet arrangements in the normal course of business. These arrangements include unfunded
loan commitments which totaled $10.0 billion and standby letters of credit which totaled $648 million at December 31, 2017.
Loan commitments may be unconditional obligations to provide financing or conditional obligations that depend on the
borrower’s financial condition, collateral value or other factors. Standby letters of credit are unconditional commitments to
guarantee the performance of our customer to a third party. Since some of these commitments are expected to expire before
being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Approximately $55
thousand of the outstanding standby letters of credit were issued on behalf of customers whose loans are nonperforming at
December 31, 2017.
Table 22 – Off-Balance Sheet Credit Commitments
(In thousands)
Loan commitments
Standby letters of credit
Mortgage loans sold with recourse
December 31,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
$
9,958,080
$
9,404,665
$
8,455,037
$
8,328,416
$
7,096,373
647,653
125,127
585,472
139,486
507,988
155,489
447,599
179,822
444,248
191,299
We have off-balance sheet commitments related to certain residential mortgage loans originated under community development
loan programs that were sold to a U.S. government agency with full recourse. These mortgage loans were underwritten to
standards approved by the agencies, including full documentation and originated under programs available only for owner-
occupied properties. We no longer sell residential mortgage loans with recourse other than obligations under standard
representations and warranties. We are obligated to repurchase these loans for the life of these loans in the event of foreclosure
for the unpaid principal and interest at the time of foreclosure. Substantially all of these loans are to borrowers in our primary
markets including $75 million to borrowers in Oklahoma, $14 million to borrowers in Arkansas and $12 million to borrowers
in New Mexico. At December 31, 2017, approximately 3% of these loans were nonperforming and 7% were past due 30 to 89
days. A separate accrual for credit risk of $3.7 million is available to absorb losses on these loans.
We also have an off-balance sheet obligation to repurchase residential mortgage loans sold to government sponsored entities
through our mortgage banking activities due to standard representations and warranties made under contractual agreements and
to service loans in accordance with investor guidelines. The Company has established accruals for losses related to these
obligations that are included in Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and in Mortgage banking costs in the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
In 2017, the Company repurchased 18 loans from the agencies for $3.5 million and paid indemnification for 11 loans. Losses
on both repurchases and indemnifications were insignificant. For the period from 2010 through 2017, approximately 21% of
repurchase requests have currently resulted in actual repurchases or indemnification by the Company.
56
A summary of unresolved deficiency requests from U.S. government agencies follows (in thousands, except for number of
unresolved deficiency requests):
Table 23 - Summary of Unresolved Deficiency Requests
(In thousands, except number of unresolved deficiency requests)
Number of unresolved deficiency requests
191
Aggregate outstanding principal balance subject to unresolved deficiency requests
$
9,737
$
Unpaid principal balance subject to indemnification by the Company
4,519
233
17,382
5,803
The accrual for credit losses related to potential loan repurchases under representations and warranties totaled $1.4 million at
December 31, 2017 and $2.8 million at December 31, 2016.
December 31,
2017
2016
Customer Derivative Programs
We offer programs that permit our customers to hedge various risks, including fluctuations in energy, cattle and other
agricultural product prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Each of these programs work essentially the same
way. Derivative contracts are executed between the customers and the Company. Offsetting contracts are executed between the
Company and selected counterparties or exchanges to minimize market risk to us from changes in commodity prices, interest
rates or foreign exchange rates. The counterparty contracts are identical to the customer contracts, except for a fixed pricing
spread or a fee paid to us as compensation for administrative costs, credit risk and profit.
The customer derivative programs create credit risk for potential amounts due to the Company from our customers and from
the counterparties. Customer credit risk is monitored through existing credit policies and procedures. The effects of changes in
commodity prices, interest rates or foreign exchange rates are evaluated across a range of possible options to determine the
maximum exposure we are willing to have individually to any customer. Customers may also be required to provide cash
margin or other collateral in conjunction with our credit agreements to further limit our credit risk.
Counterparty credit risk is evaluated through existing policies and procedures. This evaluation considers the total relationship
between BOK Financial and each of the counterparties. Individual limits are established by management, approved by Credit
Administration and reviewed by the Asset/Liability Committee. Margin collateral is required if the exposure between the
Company and any counterparty exceeds established limits. Based on declines in the counterparties’ credit ratings, these limits
may be reduced and additional margin collateral may be required.
A deterioration of the credit standing of one or more of the customers or counter-parties to these contracts may result in BOK
Financial recognizing a loss as the fair value of the affected contracts may no longer move in tandem with the offsetting
contracts. This occurs if the credit standing of the customer or counterparty deteriorated such that either the fair value of
underlying collateral no longer supports the contract or the customer or counterparty’s ability to provide margin collateral was
impaired. Credit losses on customer derivatives reduce brokerage and trading revenue in the Consolidated Statements of
Earnings.
Derivative contracts are carried at fair value. At December 31, 2017, the net fair values of derivative contracts, before
consideration of cash margin, reported as assets under these programs totaled $225 million compared to $690 million at
December 31, 2016. Derivative contracts carried as assets include foreign exchange contracts with fair values of $130 million,
energy contracts with fair values of $55 million, interest rate swaps primarily sold to loan customers with fair values of $28
million, to-be-announced residential mortgage-backed securities with fair values of $5.5 million and equity option contracts
with fair values of $5.5 million. Before consideration of cash margin paid to counterparties, the aggregate net fair values of
derivative contracts held under these programs reported as liabilities totaled $214 million.
At December 31, 2017, total derivative assets were reduced by $6.5 million of cash collateral received from counterparties and
total derivative liabilities were reduced by $56 million of cash collateral paid to counterparties related to instruments executed
with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement.
A table showing the notional and fair value of derivative assets and liabilities on both a gross and net basis is presented in Note
3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
57
The fair value of derivative contracts reported as assets under these programs, net of cash margin held by the Company, by
category of debtor at December 31, 2017 follows in Table 24.
Table 24 – Fair Value of Derivative Contracts
(In thousands)
Customers
Banks and other financial institutions
Exchanges and clearing organizations
Fair value of customer hedge asset derivative contracts, net
$
114,566
95,356
8,179
$
218,101
The largest exposure to a single counterparty was to an exchange organization for interest rate swaps which totaled $7.9 million
at December 31, 2017.
Our customer derivative program also introduces liquidity and capital risk. We are required to provide cash margin to certain
counterparties when the net negative fair value of the contracts exceeds established limits. Also, changes in commodity prices
affect the amount of regulatory capital we are required to hold as support for the fair value of our derivative assets. These risks
are modeled as part of the management of these programs. Based on current prices, a decrease in market prices equivalent to
$29.96 per barrel of oil would decrease the fair value of derivative assets by $33 million. An increase in prices equivalent to
$83.53 per barrel of oil would increase the fair value of derivative assets by $366 million. Liquidity requirements of this
program are also affected by our credit rating. A decrease in credit rating to below investment grade would increase our
obligation to post cash margin on existing contracts by approximately $10 million. The fair value of our to-be-announced
residential mortgage-backed securities and interest rate swap derivative contracts is affected by changes in interest rates. Based
on our assessment as of December 31, 2017, changes in interest rates would not materially impact regulatory capital or liquidity
needed to support this portion of our customer derivative program.
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
We maintain an allowance for loan losses and an accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk. At December 31, 2017, the combined
allowance for loan losses and accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk totaled $234 million or 1.37% of outstanding loans and
131% of nonaccruing loans, excluding loans guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies. The allowance for loan losses was $231
million and the accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk was $3.7 million. At December 31, 2016, the combined allowance for
credit losses was $257 million or 1.52% of outstanding loans and 117% of nonaccruing loans, excluding loans guaranteed by
U.S. Government agencies. The allowance for loan losses was $246 million and the accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk was
$11.2 million.
The provision for credit losses is the amount necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses and an accrual for off-balance
sheet credit risk at an amount determined by management to be appropriate based on its evaluation. The provision includes the
combined charge or credit to expense for both the allowance for loan losses and the accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk. All
losses incurred from lending activities will ultimately be reflected in charge-offs against the allowance for loan losses following
funds advanced against outstanding commitments. Based on an evaluation of all credit factors, including sustained
improvement in nonaccruing and potential problem loans and net charge-offs during the year, the Company determined that a
$7.0 million negative provision for credit losses was appropriate.
Based on currently available information, such as historical credit factors by loan type and other qualitative and environmental
factors, including the results of our energy stress testing, we anticipate continued improvement in credit quality in the first half
of 2018.
58
Table 25 – Summary of Loan Loss Experience
(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
Loans charged off:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total
Net loans recovered (charged off )
Provision for loan losses
Ending balance
Accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk:
Beginning balance
Provision for off-balance sheet credit risk
Ending balance
Total combined provision for credit losses
Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding at period end
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans
Total provision for credit losses to average loans
Recoveries to gross charge-offs
Allowance for loan losses as a multiple of net charge-offs
Accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk to off-balance sheet
credit commitments
Combined allowance for credit losses to loans outstanding at
period-end
Allowance for Loan Losses
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
$ 246,159
$ 225,524
$
189,056
$ 185,396
$ 215,507
(19,810)
(35,828)
(6,734)
(944)
(2,205)
(5,288)
(3,569)
(2,047)
(4,448)
(6,168)
(6,335)
(5,845)
(5,753)
(7,349)
(42,588)
(15,171)
(16,232)
(25,282)
(76)
(649)
(5,064)
(25,599)
4,461
1,940
760
2,451
9,612
—
(1,312)
(5,448)
1,727
1,283
1,999
2,747
7,756
(15,987)
510
(34,832)
55,467
$ 230,682
$ 246,159
$
$
$
11,244
(7,510)
3,734
(7,000)
$
$
$
1,711
9,533
11,244
65,000
$
$
$
$
1.34 %
0.09 %
(0.04)%
37.55 %
14.43x
1.45%
0.21%
0.40%
18.21%
7.07x
2,729
11,079
1,260
3,052
18,120
2,949
33,519
5,703
7,003
2,000
4,328
19,034
2,802
858
7,488
9,420
1,558
4,778
23,244
(2,038)
(28,073)
225,524
$ 189,056
$ 185,396
1,230
481
1,711
34,000
1.41 %
(0.02)%
0.23 %
119.44 %
(76.47)x
$
$
$
2,088
(858)
1,230
$
$
1,915
173
2,088
— $ (27,900)
1.33 %
(0.02)%
— %
117.26 %
(67.47)x
1.45 %
0.02 %
(0.23)%
91.94 %
90.97x
0.04 %
0.11%
0.02 %
0.01 %
0.03 %
1.37 %
1.52%
1.43 %
1.34 %
1.47 %
The appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is assessed by management based on an ongoing quarterly evaluation of
the probable estimated losses inherent in the portfolio. The allowance consists of specific allowances attributed to certain
impaired loans, general allowances based on estimated loss rates by loan class and non-specific allowances based on general
economic conditions, concentration in loans with large balances and other relevant factors.
Loans are considered to be impaired when it is probable that we will not collect all amounts due according to the original
contractual terms of the loan agreements. This includes all nonaccruing loans, all loans modified in trouble debt restructurings
and all government guaranteed loans repurchased from GNMA pools. At December 31, 2017, impaired loans totaled $376
million, including $51 million with specific allowances of $8.8 million and $325 million with no specific allowances because
the loan balances represent the amounts we expect to recover. Our most recently completed energy portfolio redetermination
supported that $41 million of impaired energy loans required no allowance for credit losses based on the adequacy of collateral.
In addition, $43 million of impaired energy loans are current on all payments due. At December 31, 2016, impaired loans
totaled $419 million, including $11 million of impaired loans with specific allowances of $843 thousand and $407 million with
no specific allowances.
59
General allowances for unimpaired loans are based on an estimated loss rate by loan class. Estimated loss rates for risk-graded
loans are either increased or decreased based on changes in risk grading for each loan class. Estimated loss rates for both risk-
graded and non-risk graded loans may be further adjusted for inherent risks identified for the given loan class which have not
yet been captured in the loss rate.
The aggregate amount of general allowances for all unimpaired loans totaled $200 million at December 31, 2017, compared to
$217 million at December 31, 2016. The general allowance for the commercial loan portfolio segment decreased by $24
million, primarily related to improved risk grading of energy loans. The general allowance for the commercial real estate loan
portfolio segment increased $5.9 million over December 31, 2016 primarily due to increased inherent risk in retail, office and
multifamily loans. The general allowance for residential mortgage loans increased $273 thousand and the general allowance for
personal loans increased $351 thousand over the prior year.
Nonspecific allowances are maintained for risks beyond factors specific to a particular portfolio segment or loan class. These
factors include trends in the economy in our primary lending areas, concentrations in loans with large balances and other
relevant factors. Nonspecific allowances totaled $22 million at December 31, 2017, down from $28 million at December 31,
2016. The nonspecific allowance decreased due to decreased concentration in loans with large balances and improving
economic trends in our primary geographical lending areas, offset by the estimated impact of Hurricane Harvey in the Houston,
Texas area.
An allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category follows in Table 26.
Table 26 – Allowance for Loan Losses Allocation
(Dollars in thousands)
2017
2016
December 31,
2015
2014
2013
Allowance
% of
Loans1
Allowance
% of
Loans1
Allowance
% of
Loans1
Allowance
% of
Loans1
Allowance
% of
Loans1
Loan category:
Commercial
$ 124,269
62.58% $ 140,213
61.16% $ 130,334
64.32% $
90,875
64.02% $
79,180
62.10%
Commercial
real estate
Residential
mortgage
Personal
Nonspecific
allowance
56,621
20.29%
50,749
22.42%
41,391
20.44%
42,445
19.20%
41,573
18.88%
11.50%
5.63%
18,451
9,124
22,217
18,224
8,773
28,200
11.48%
4.94%
19,509
4,164
30,126
11.77%
3.47%
13.72%
3.06%
23,458
4,233
28,045
16.04%
2.98%
29,465
6,965
28,213
Total
$ 230,682
100.00% $ 246,159
100.00% $ 225,524
100.00% $ 189,056
100.00% $ 185,396
100.00%
1 Represents ratio of loan category balance to total loans.
Our loan monitoring process also identified certain accruing substandard loans, based on regulatory guidelines, that possess
more than the normal amount of risk due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower or the value of the
collateral. Because the borrowers are still performing in accordance with the original terms of the loan agreements, and no loss
of principal or interest is anticipated, these loans were not included in nonperforming assets. Known information does,
however, cause management concern as to the borrowers’ continued ability to comply with current repayment terms. These
potential problem loans totaled $241 million at December 31, 2017 composed primarily of $145 million or 5% of energy loans,
$43 million or less than 2% of healthcare loans, $27 million or 1% of services loans and $11 million or 2% of manufacturing
loans. Potential problem loans totaled $399 million at December 31, 2016.
Our loan monitoring process also identified loans considered to be "other loans especially mentioned" based on regulatory
guidelines. Other loans especially mentioned are in compliance with the original terms of the agreement, but may have a
weakness that deserves management's close attention. Other loans especially mentioned totaled $118 million at December 31,
2017 and were composed primarily of $60 million or 2% of energy loans, $19 million or 1% of wholesale/retail sector loans
and $14 million or less than 1% of service sector loans. Other loans especially mentioned totaled $230 million at December 31,
2016.
60
We updated our semi-annual energy loan portfolio stress test as of December 31, 2017 to estimate how the energy portfolio
may respond in a prolonged low-price environment. Stress test assumptions applied the five year forward pricing curve to a
starting price of $2.17 per million BTUs for natural gas and $45.88 per barrel of oil and then escalating 3% annually for years
six through ten to a maximum of $2.67 and $47.26, respectively.
Net Loans Charged Off
Loans are charged off against the allowance for loan losses when the loan balance or a portion of the loan balance is no longer
covered by the paying capacity of the borrower based on an evaluation of available cash resources and collateral
value. Internally risk graded loans are evaluated quarterly and charge-offs are taken in the quarter in which the loss is
identified. Non-risk graded loans are generally charged off when payments are between 60 days and 180 days past due,
depending on loan class. In addition, non-risk graded loans are generally charged-down to collateral value within 60 days of
being notified of a borrower's bankruptcy filing, regardless of payment status.
BOK Financial had net loans charged off of $16.0 million or 0.09% of average loans for 2017, compared to net loans charged
off of $34.8 million or 0.21% of average loans in 2016.
Net commercial loans charged off totaled $15.3 million, primarily from $11.9 million of net charge-offs from healthcare sector
loans and $5.1 million of net charge-offs from energy sector loans, partially offset by $749 thousand of net recoveries from
service sector loans. Net commercial real estate loan recoveries totaled $1.9 million. Net recoveries of residential mortgage
loans totaled $111 thousand for the year and net charge-offs of personal loans were $2.6 million.
61
$
$
$
Table 26 – Nonperforming Assets
(In thousands)
Nonaccruing loans:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total nonaccruing loans
Accruing renegotiated loans guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Real estate and other repossessed assets:
Guaranteed by U.S. government agencies1
Other
Real estate and other repossessed assets
Total nonperforming assets
Total nonperforming assets excluding those
guaranteed by U.S. government agencies
Nonaccruing loans by loan class:
Commercial:
Services
Energy
Healthcare
Wholesale/retail
Manufacturing
Other commercial and industrial
Total commercial
Commercial real estate:
Multifamily
Office
Retail
Industrial
Residential construction and land development
Other commercial real estate
Total commercial real estate
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage
Permanent mortgages guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Home equity
Total residential mortgage
Personal
Total nonaccruing loans
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
December 31,
$
137,303
$
178,953
$
76,424
$
2,855
47,447
269
5,521
46,220
290
187,874
230,984
9,001
61,240
463
147,128
73,994
81,370
74,049
—
28,437
28,437
290,305
207,132
—
44,287
44,287
356,641
263,425
$
$
$
$
—
30,731
30,731
251,908
155,959
2,620
$
8,173
$
92,284
14,765
2,574
5,962
19,098
137,303
—
275
276
—
1,832
472
2,855
132,499
825
11,407
4,931
21,118
38
426
326
76
3,433
1,222
5,521
25,193
22,855
9,179
13,075
47,447
269
11,846
11,519
46,220
290
$
$
$
$
13,527
18,557
48,121
566
80,771
73,985
49,898
51,963
101,861
256,617
129,022
5,201
1,416
1,380
4,149
450
931
16,760
40,850
42,320
1,219
101,149
54,322
37,431
54,841
92,272
247,743
155,213
4,922
1,860
1,586
6,969
592
831
$
$
$
10,290
61,189
1,072
2,919
331
623
274
651
1,319
76
4,409
2,272
9,001
28,984
21,900
10,356
61,240
463
—
3,420
3,926
—
5,299
5,912
18,557
34,845
3,712
9,564
48,121
566
7
6,391
4,857
252
17,377
11,966
40,850
34,279
777
7,264
42,320
1,219
178,953
76,424
13,527
16,760
$
187,874
$
230,984
$
147,128
$
80,771
$
101,149
62
Table 26 – Nonperforming Assets
(In thousands)
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
December 31,
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccruing loans2
Accruing loans 90 days or more past due2
Foregone interest on nonaccruing loans3
5,361
1 Approximately $50 million was reclassified from Real estate and other repossessed assets to Receivables on the balance sheet on January
129.09%
112.33%
180.09%
245.34%
16,496
15,990
1,415
8,170
7,432
1,207
125
633
$
$
$
5
$
$
184.71%
1, 2015 with the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-14, Classification of Certain Government-
Guaranteed Mortgage Loans Upon Foreclosure ("ASU 2014-14"). With the implementation of ASU 2014-14, upon foreclosure of loans
for which the loan balance is expected to be recovered from the guarantee by a U.S. government agency, the loan balance is directly
reclassified to other receivables without including such foreclosed assets in real estate and other repossessed assets.
2 Excludes residential mortgages guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. government.
3 Interest collected and recognized on nonaccruing loans was not significant in 2017 and previous years.
Nonperforming assets totaled $290 million or 1.69% of outstanding loans and repossessed assets at December 31, 2017, a $66
million decrease compared to the prior year. Nonaccruing loans totaled $188 million, accruing renegotiated residential
mortgage loans totaled $74 million and real estate and other repossessed assets totaled $28 million. All accruing renegotiated
residential mortgage loans and $9.2 million of nonaccruing loans are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Excluding
assets guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, nonperforming assets decreased $56 million to $207 million or 1.22% of
outstanding non-guaranteed loans and repossessed assets. The decrease was primarily due to nonaccruing energy loans and real
estate and other repossessed assets. The Company generally retains nonperforming assets to maximize potential recovery,
which may cause future nonperforming assets to decrease more slowly.
Loans are generally classified as nonaccruing when it becomes probable that we will not collect the full contractual principal
and interest. As more fully discussed in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we may modify loans in a troubled
debt restructuring. Modifications may include extension of payment terms and rate concessions. We generally do not forgive
principal or accrued but unpaid interest. All loans modified in troubled debt restructurings, except residential mortgage loans
guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, are classified as nonaccruing. We may renew matured nonaccruing loans. All
nonaccruing loans, including those renewed or modified in troubled debt restructurings, are charged off when the loan balance
is no longer covered by the paying capacity of the borrower based on a quarterly evaluation of available cash resources and
collateral value. All nonaccruing loans generally remain on nonaccruing status until full collection of principal and interest in
accordance with the original terms, including principal previously charged off, is probable. We generally do not voluntarily
modify personal loans to troubled borrowers. Personal loans modified at the direction of bankruptcy court orders are identified
as troubled debt restructurings and classified as nonaccruing.
As of December 31, 2017, renegotiated loans consist solely of accruing residential mortgage loans guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings. Generally, we modify residential mortgage loans
primarily by reducing interest rates and extending the number of payments in accordance with U.S. government agency
guidelines. No unpaid principal or interest is forgiven. Interest continues to accrue based on the modified terms of the
loan. Modified loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies under residential mortgage loan programs may be sold once they
become eligible according to U.S. government agency guidelines.
63
A rollforward of nonperforming assets for the year ended December 31, 2017 follows in Table 28.
Table 28 – Rollforward of Nonperforming Assets
(In thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2016
Additions
Net transfer from premises and equipment
Payments
Charge-offs
Net losses and write-downs
Foreclosure of nonaccruing loans
Foreclosure of loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies
Proceeds from sales
Net transfers to nonaccruing loans
Return to accrual status
Other, net
Balance, December 31, 2017
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Nonaccruing
Loans
Renegotiated
Loans
Real Estate
and Other
Repossessed
Assets
Total
Nonperforming
Assets
$
230,984
$
81,370
$
44,287
$
138,632
—
(137,879)
(25,599)
—
(6,060)
(5,881)
—
205
(6,598)
70
56,562
—
(3,090)
—
—
—
(7,023)
(54,721)
(205)
—
1,101
—
1,307
—
—
(1,951)
6,060
—
(19,073)
—
—
(2,193)
356,641
195,194
1,307
(140,969)
(25,599)
(1,951)
—
(12,904)
(73,794)
—
(6,598)
(1,022)
$
187,874
$
73,994
$
28,437
$
290,305
We foreclose on loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies in accordance with agency guidelines. Generally these loans
are not eligible for modification programs or have failed to comply with modified loan terms. Principal is guaranteed by
agencies of the U.S. government, subject to limitations and credit risk is minimal. At foreclosure, these amounts are transferred
to claims receivable accounts. These properties will be conveyed to the agencies and receivables collected once applicable
criteria have been met.
Nonaccruing loans totaled $188 million or 1.10% of outstanding loans at December 31, 2017, compared to $231 million or
1.36% of outstanding loans at December 31, 2016. Nonaccruing loans decreased $43 million compared to December 31, 2016.
Newly identified nonaccruing loans totaled $139 million for 2017, partially offset by $138 million of payments, $26 million of
charge-offs and $6.1 million of foreclosures.
Commercial
Nonaccruing commercial loans totaled $137 million or 1.28% of total commercial loans at December 31, 2017, down from
$179 million or 1.72% of total commercial loans at December 31, 2016. Newly identified nonaccruing commercial loans
totaled $109 million, offset by $125 million in payments, $20 million of charge-offs and $329 thousand of repossessions.
Nonaccruing commercial loans at December 31, 2017 were primarily composed of $92 million or 3.15% of total energy loans,
$19 million or 3.58% of other commercial and industrial loans and $15 million or 0.64% of healthcare sector loans.
Commercial Real Estate
Nonaccruing commercial real estate loans were $2.9 million or 0.08% of outstanding commercial real estate loans at
December 31, 2017, compared to $5.5 million or 0.14% of outstanding commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2016. The
$2.7 million decrease was primarily due to $4.7 million of cash payments received, $1.1 million of foreclosures and $76
thousand of charge-offs, partially offset by $3.2 million of newly identified commercial real estate loans during the year.
Nonaccruing commercial real estate loans were composed of $1.8 million or 1.56% of total residential land development and
construction loans.
64
Residential Mortgage and Personal
Nonaccruing residential mortgage loans totaled $47 million or 2.40% of outstanding residential mortgage loans at
December 31, 2017, compared to $46 million or 2.37% of outstanding residential mortgage loans at December 31, 2016. Newly
identified nonaccruing residential mortgage loans of $21 million were offset by $11 million of foreclosures, $8.2 million of
cash payments and $649 thousand of loans charged off during the year. Nonaccruing residential mortgage loans primarily
consisted of $25 million or 2.41% of non-guaranteed permanent residential mortgage loans and $13 million or 1.78% of total
home equity loans.
Payments on accruing residential mortgage loans and personal loans may be delinquent. The composition of residential
mortgage loans and personal loans past due but still accruing is included in the following Table 29. Substantially all non-
guaranteed residential loans past due 90 days or more are nonaccruing. At December 31, 2017, residential mortgage loans 30 to
59 days past due of $5.6 million was largely unchanged compared to the prior year. Residential mortgage loans 60 to 89 days
past due decreased $958 thousand from December 31, 2016. Personal loans 30 to 59 days past due increased $92 thousand and
personal loans 60 to 89 days past due decreased $72 thousand compared to December 31, 2016. Personal loans 90 days or more
past due increased $256 thousand.
Table 29 – Residential Mortgage and Personal Loans Past Due
(In thousands)
December 31, 2017
60 to 89
Days
90 Days
or More
30 to 59
Days
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage1
Home equity
Total residential mortgage
$
$
— $
17
17
$
219
440
659
$
$
3,435
2,206
5,641
Personal
1 Excludes past due residential mortgage loans guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. government.
261
191
$
$
$
681
December 31, 2016
90 Days
or More
60 to 89
Days
30 to 59
Days
$
$
$
— $
—
— $
1,280
337
1,617
5
$
263
$
$
$
3,299
2,276
5,575
589
Real Estate and Other Repossessed Assets
Real estate and other repossessed assets are assets acquired in partial or total forgiveness of loans. The assets are carried at the
lower of cost as determined by fair value at date of foreclosure or current fair value, less estimated selling costs.
Real estate and other repossessed assets totaled $28 million at December 31, 2017, composed primarily of $18 million of oil
and gas properties, $5.9 million of 1-4 family residential properties and $4.2 million of undeveloped land primarily zoned for
commercial development. The residential properties and undeveloped land are widely disbursed across our geographical
footprint. Real estate and other repossessed assets decreased $16 million compared to December 31, 2016.
65
Liquidity and Capital
Based on the average balances for 2017, approximately 67% of our funding was provided by deposit accounts, 19% from
borrowed funds, less than 1% from long-term subordinated debt and 10% from equity. Our funding sources, which primarily
include deposits and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Banks, provide adequate liquidity to meet our operating needs.
Subsidiary Bank
Deposits and borrowed funds are the primary sources of liquidity for the Bank. Deposit accounts represent our largest funding
source. We compete for retail and commercial deposits by offering a broad range of products and services and focusing on
customer convenience. Retail deposit growth is supported through personal and small business checking, online bill paying
services, mobile banking services, an extensive network of branch locations and ATMs and our Express Bank call
center. Commercial deposit growth is supported by offering treasury management and lockbox services. We also acquire
brokered deposits when the cost of funds is advantageous to other funding sources.
Table 30 - Average Deposits by Line of Business
(In thousands)
Commercial Banking
Consumer Banking
Wealth Management
Subtotal
Funds Management and other
Total
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
8,681,424
$
8,430,507
6,654,631
5,516,214
6,632,687
4,867,293
20,852,269
19,930,487
1,332,512
$
962,086
$ 22,184,781
$ 20,892,573
Average deposits for 2017 totaled $22.2 billion and represented approximately 67% of total liabilities and capital compared
with $20.9 billion and 65% of total liabilities and capital for 2016. Average deposits increased $1.3 billion over the prior year,
including $491 million related to the full-year impact of the Mobank acquisition. Demand deposits grew by $839 million and
interest-bearing transaction deposit account balances increased by $475 million, partially offset by a $66 million decrease in
time deposits.
Average deposits attributed to Commercial Banking were $8.7 billion for 2017, a $251 million or 3% increase over 2016.
Growth in demand and time deposit balances was partially offset by decreased interest-bearing transaction account balances.
Average balances attributed to our commercial & industrial loan customers increased $127 million or 3% and small business
banking customer balances increased $117 million or 9%. Average balances attributed to our energy customers increased $33
million or 2%. Average balances attributed to commercial real estate customers were up $27 million or 6%. This growth was
partially offset as average balances attributed to our healthcare customers decreased $54 million or 8% and treasury services
account balances decreased $22 million or 20%. Commercial customers continue to retain large cash reserves primarily due to
a combination of factors including uncertainty about the economic environment and potential for growth, lack of preferable
liquid alternatives and a desire to minimize deposit service charges through the earnings credit. The earnings credit is a non-
cash method that enables commercial customers to offset deposit service charges based on account balances. Commercial
deposit balances may decrease once the economic outlook improves and customers deploy cash or related earnings credit rates
rise, reducing the amount of deposits required to offset service charges.
Average Consumer Banking deposit balances were largely unchanged compared to the prior year. Average demand deposit
balances grew by $92 million or 6%. Average savings account balances were up $39 million or 10% and average interest-
bearing transaction accounts increased $30 million or 1%. Higher costing time deposit balances decreased $139 million or
12%. Average Wealth Management deposit balances grew by $649 million or 13% over the prior year. Interest-bearing
transaction balances increased $420 million or 14%. Non-interest-bearing demand deposits increased $165 million or 14%, and
time deposit balances were up $62 million or 9%.
The general trend of increased deposits over the past several years reflects modest growth in the overall economy and low
short-term interest rates. If economic activity were to improve significantly, deposits may decline as customers deploy funds
into projects. In addition, if short-term interest rates were to increase further, customers could shift deposits from non-interest
bearing demand deposits into interest-bearing alternatives.
66
Table 31 - Maturity of Domestic CDs and Public
Funds in Amounts of $100,000 or More
(In thousands)
Months to maturity:
3 or less
Over 3 through 6
Over 6 through 12
Over 12
Total
December 31,
2017
2016
$
$
368,584
$
278,607
253,277
661,074
295,755
243,210
315,506
590,981
1,561,542
$
1,445,452
Brokered deposits included in time deposits averaged $588 million for 2017, compared to $495 million for 2016. Brokered
deposits included in time deposits totaled $573 million at December 31, 2017 and $514 million at December 31, 2016.
Average interest-bearing transaction accounts for 2017 included $1.4 billion of brokered deposits compared to $732 million for
2016. Brokered deposits included in interest-bearing transaction accounts totaled $1.5 billion at December 31, 2017 and $1.3
billion at December 31, 2016. The increase in brokered interest-bearing transaction account balances was primarily due to use
of a reciprocal program by Wealth Management that spreads large customer deposits among participating banks in amounts that
qualify for FDIC insurance. In exchange, we also receive deposits from participating banks in amounts that qualify for FDIC
insurance. Our increased use of this reciprocal program has enabled us to reduce the amount of deposits we are required to
collateralize, thereby improving liquidity. In addition, non-reciprocal brokered interest-bearing transaction accounts attributed
to Funds Management and Other increased during the year.
67
The distribution of our period end deposit account balances among principal markets follows in Table 32.
Table 31 -- Period End Deposits by Principal Market Area
(In thousands)
Bank of Oklahoma:
Demand
Interest-bearing:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing
Total Bank of Oklahoma
Bank of Texas:
Demand
Interest-bearing:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing
Total Bank of Texas
Bank of Albuquerque:
Demand
Interest-bearing:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
December 31,
$
3,885,008
$
3,993,170
$
4,133,520
$ 3,828,819
$
3,432,940
5,901,293
265,870
1,092,133
7,259,296
6,345,536
241,696
1,118,355
7,705,587
5,971,819
6,117,886
226,733
1,202,274
7,400,826
206,357
1,301,194
7,625,437
6,318,045
191,880
1,214,507
7,724,432
11,144,304
11,698,757
11,534,346
11,454,256
11,157,372
3,239,098
3,137,009
2,627,764
2,639,732
2,481,603
2,397,071
2,388,812
2,132,099
2,065,723
1,966,580
93,620
502,879
2,993,570
6,232,668
83,101
535,642
3,007,555
6,144,564
77,902
549,740
2,759,741
5,387,505
72,037
547,316
2,685,076
5,324,808
64,632
638,465
2,669,677
5,151,280
663,353
627,979
487,286
487,819
502,395
552,393
55,647
216,743
824,783
590,571
49,963
238,408
878,942
563,723
43,672
267,821
875,216
519,544
37,471
295,798
852,813
529,140
33,944
327,281
890,365
Total Bank of Albuquerque
1,488,136
1,506,921
1,362,502
1,340,632
1,392,760
Bank of Arkansas:
Demand
Interest-bearing:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing
Total Bank of Arkansas
30,384
26,389
27,252
35,996
38,566
85,095
1,881
14,045
101,021
131,405
105,232
2,192
16,696
124,120
150,509
202,857
1,747
24,983
229,587
256,839
158,115
1,936
28,520
188,571
224,567
144,018
1,986
32,949
178,953
217,519
68
Table 31 -- Period End Deposits by Principal Market Area
(In thousands)
Colorado State Bank & Trust:
Demand
Interest-bearing:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
December 31,
633,714
576,000
497,318
445,755
409,942
657,629
35,223
224,962
917,814
616,679
32,866
242,782
892,327
616,697
31,927
296,224
944,848
631,874
29,811
353,998
1,015,683
1,461,438
541,675
26,880
407,088
975,643
1,385,585
Total Colorado State Bank & Trust
1,551,528
1,468,327
1,442,166
Bank of Arizona:
Demand
Interest-bearing:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing
Total Bank of Arizona
Mobank (Kansas City):
Demand
Interest-bearing:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing
Total Mobank (Kansas City)
334,701
366,755
326,324
369,115
204,092
274,846
3,343
20,394
298,583
633,284
305,099
2,973
27,765
335,837
702,592
358,556
2,893
29,498
390,947
717,271
347,214
2,545
36,680
386,439
755,554
364,736
2,432
34,391
401,559
605,651
457,080
508,418
197,424
259,121
246,739
382,066
13,574
27,260
422,900
879,980
513,176
12,679
42,152
568,007
1,076,425
153,203
1,378
35,524
190,105
387,529
273,999
1,274
45,210
320,483
579,604
69,857
1,252
41,312
112,421
359,160
Total BOK Financial deposits
$
22,061,305
$
22,748,095
$ 21,088,158
$ 21,140,859
$
20,269,327
See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of other borrowings.
In addition to deposits, liquidity for the Bank is provided primarily by federal funds purchased, securities repurchase
agreements and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings. Federal funds purchased consist primarily of unsecured, overnight funds
acquired from other financial institutions. Funds are primarily purchased from bankers’ banks and Federal Home Loan Banks
from across the country. There were no wholesale federal funds purchased outstanding at December 31, 2017. Securities
repurchase agreements generally mature within 90 days and are secured by certain available for sale securities. Federal Home
Loan Bank borrowings are generally short term and are secured by a blanket pledge of eligible collateral (generally
unencumbered U.S. Treasury and mortgage-backed securities, 1-4 family residential mortgage loans, multifamily and other
qualifying commercial real estate loans). Amounts borrowed from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka averaged $5.9
billion during 2017 and $6.0 billion during 2016.
At December 31, 2017, the estimated unused credit available to the Bank from collateralized sources was approximately $5.7
billion.
BOKF, NA also has a liability related to the repurchase of certain delinquent residential mortgage loans previously sold in
GNMA mortgage pools. Interest is payable monthly at rates contractually due to investors.
69
Parent Company and Other Non-Bank Subsidiaries
The primary sources of liquidity for BOK Financial are cash on hand and dividends from the Bank. Cash and cash equivalents
totaled $206 million at December 31, 2017. Dividends from the Bank are limited by various banking regulations to net profits,
as defined, for the year plus retained profits for the two preceding years. Dividends are further restricted by minimum capital
requirements. At December 31, 2017, based on the most restrictive limitations as well as management’s internal capital policy,
BOKF, NA could declare up to $321 million of dividends without regulatory approval. Dividend constraints may be alleviated
through increases in retained earnings, capital issuances or changes in risk weighted assets. Future losses or increases in
required regulatory capital could also affect its ability to pay dividends to the parent company.
On June 27, 2016, the parent company issued $150 million of subordinated debt that will mature on June 30, 2056. This debt
bears interest at the rate of 5.375%, payable quarterly. On June 30, 2021, we will have the option to redeem the debt at the
principal amount plus accrued interest, subject to regulatory approval.
Shareholders' equity at December 31, 2017 was $3.5 billion, an increase of $221 million over December 31, 2016. Net income
less cash dividends paid increased equity $225 million during 2017. Changes in interest rates resulted in an increase in the
accumulated other comprehensive loss to $36 million at December 31, 2017, compared to $11 million at December 31, 2016.
The Company also repurchased $7.4 million of our common stock during 2017. Capital is managed to maximize long-term
value to the shareholders. Factors considered in managing capital include projections of future earnings including expected
benefits from lower federal income tax rates, asset growth and acquisition strategies, and regulatory and debt covenant
requirements. Capital management may include subordinated debt issuance, share repurchase and stock and cash dividends.
On October 27, 2015, the board of directors authorized the Company to purchase up to five million common shares, subject to
market conditions, securities laws and other regulatory compliance limitations. As of December 31, 2017, a cumulative total of
2,959,243 shares have been repurchased under this authorization. The Company repurchased 80,000 shares during 2017 at an
average price of $92.54 per share.
BOK Financial and the Bank are subject to various capital requirements administered by federal agencies. Failure to meet
minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and additional discretionary actions by regulators that could
have a material impact on operations. These capital requirements include quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and off-
balance sheet items. The capital standards are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators.
Effective January 1, 2015, capital rules establish a 7% threshold for the common equity Tier 1 ratio consisting of a minimum
level plus capital conservation buffer. The Company has elected to exclude unrealized gains and losses from available for sale
securities from its calculation of Tier 1 capital, consistent with the treatment under previous capital rules. Components of the
capital rules effective January 1, 2015 will phase in through January 1, 2019, with certain exceptions.
A summary of minimum capital requirements, including capital conservation buffer follows in Table 33. Failure to meet these
minimum capital requirements, including capital conservation buffer, could subject BOK Financial to regulatory restrictions on
capital distributions (including but not limited to dividends and share repurchases) and executive bonus payments.
The capital ratios for BOK Financial on a consolidated basis are presented in Table 33 following.
70
Table 33 – Capital Ratios
Risk-based capital:
Common equity Tier 1
Tier 1 capital
Total capital
Tier 1 Leverage
Average total equity to average assets
Tangible common equity ratio
Minimum
Capital
Requirement
Capital
Conservation
Buffer
Minimum
Capital
Requirement
Including
Capital
Conservation
Buffer
4.50%
6.00%
8.00%
4.00%
2.50%
2.50%
2.50%
N/A
7.00%
8.50%
10.50%
4.00%
December 31,
2017
2016
12.05%
12.05%
13.54%
9.31%
10.43%
9.50%
11.21%
11.21%
12.81%
8.72%
10.38%
8.61%
Capital resources of financial institutions are also regularly measured by the tangible common shareholders’ equity
ratio. Tangible common shareholders’ equity is shareholders’ equity as defined by generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States of America (“GAAP”), including unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, less intangible
assets and equity which does not benefit common shareholders. Equity that does not benefit common shareholders includes
preferred equity. This non-GAAP measure is a valuable indicator of a financial institution’s capital strength since it eliminates
intangible assets from shareholders’ equity and retains the effect of unrealized losses on securities and other components of
accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.
Table 34 following provides a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures with financial measures defined by GAAP.
Table 34 – Non-GAAP Measures
(Dollars in thousands)
Tangible common equity ratio:
Total shareholders' equity
Less: Goodwill and intangible assets, net
Tangible common equity
Total assets
Less: Goodwill and intangible assets, net
Tangible assets
Tangible common equity ratio
December 31,
2017
2016
$ 3,495,367
476,088
3,019,279
32,272,160
476,088
$ 31,796,072
$
3,274,854
495,830
2,779,024
32,772,281
495,830
$ 32,276,451
9.50%
8.61%
On October 18, 2017, BOK Financial published the results of its annual capital stress test. In accordance with the Dodd-Frank
Act, the Federal Reserve must publish regulations that require bank holding companies with $10 billion to $50 billion in assets
to perform annual capital stress tests. The requirements for annual capital stress tests became effective for the Company in the
fourth quarter of 2013. The Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test ("DFAST") is a forward-looking exercise under which the Company
and its banking subsidiary estimate the impact of a hypothetical severely adverse macroeconomic scenario provided by the
Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on its financial condition and regulatory capital ratios over a
nine-quarter time horizon. Under the scenario provided by the regulatory agencies, all capital ratio measures remain above
minimum regulatory thresholds. Additional information concerning the annual stress test may be found on the Company's
Investor Relations page at www.bokf.com under the "Presentations" tab. The results of future capital stress tests may place
constraints on capital distributions or increases in required regulatory capital under certain circumstances.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the Company’s significant off-balance sheet
commitments.
71
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
BOK Financial has numerous contractual obligations in the normal course of business. These obligations include time deposits
and other borrowed funds, premises used under various operating leases, commitments to extend credit to borrowers and to
purchase securities, derivative contracts and contracts for services such as data processing that are integral to our operations.
Table 35 following summarizes payments due on contractual obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.
Table 35 – Contractual Obligations as of December 31, 2017
(In thousands)
Time deposits
Other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Operating lease obligations
Derivative contracts
Data processing services
Total
Loan commitments
Standby letters of credit
Mortgage loans sold with recourse
Alternative investment commitments
Unfunded third-party private equity commitments
Less Than
1 Year
1 to 3
Years
4 to 5
Years
More Than
5 Years
Total
$
605,018
$
308,532
$
245,133
$
365,219
$
1,523,902
840
8,063
18,858
49,303
15,696
2,168
16,125
36,428
17,774
14,353
2,218
16,125
24,697
14,835
3,068
12,839
414,771
72,960
5,972
—
18,065
455,084
152,943
87,884
33,117
$
697,778
$
395,380
$
306,076
$
871,761
$
2,270,995
$
9,958,080
647,653
125,127
70,827
3,360
Payments on time deposits, other borrowed funds and subordinated debentures include interest which has been calculated from
rates at December 31, 2017. These obligations may have variable interest rates and actual payments will differ from the
amounts shown on this table.
Payments on time deposits are based on contractual maturity dates. These funds may be withdrawn prior to maturity. We may
charge the customer a penalty for early withdrawal.
Operating lease commitments generally represent real property we rent for branch offices, corporate offices and operations
facilities. Payments presented represent the minimum lease payments and exclude related costs such as utilities and property
taxes.
Obligations under derivative contracts are used in customer hedging programs. As previously discussed, we have entered into
derivative contracts which are expected to substantially offset the cash payments due on these obligations.
We also have obligations with respect to employee benefit plans. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information about our employee benefit plans.
Data processing and communications contracts represent the minimum obligations under the contracts. Additional payments
that are based on the volume of transactions processed are excluded.
Loan commitments represent legally binding obligations to provide financing to our customers. Some of these commitments
are expected to expire before being drawn upon and the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. Approximately $1.3 billion of the loan commitments expire within one year.
72
The Company has funded $217 million and has commitments to fund an additional $71 million for various alternative
investments. Alternative investments generally consist of limited partnership interests in or loans to entities that invest in low
income housing or economic development projects, distressed assets, energy development, venture capital and other
activities. The Company is prohibited by banking regulations from controlling or actively managing the activities of these
investments. Legally binding commitments to fund alternative investments are recognized as liabilities in the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
An indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company is general partner of two private equity funds and has contingent
obligations to make additional investments totaling $3.4 million as of December 31, 2017. These commitments, which are
included in unfunded third-party private equity commitments, generally reflect customer investment obligations. We do not
recognize contingent commitments to fund investments that are primarily customer obligations as liabilities in the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosure of newly adopted and pending accounting standards.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on management's beliefs, assumptions, current expectations,
estimates, and projections about BOK Financial, the financial services industry and the economy in general. Words such as
“anticipates,” “believes,” ”estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “plans,” “projects,” “will,” “intends,” variations of such words
and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Management judgments relating to and
discussion of the provision and allowance for loan losses and accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk, allowance for uncertain
tax positions, accruals for loss contingencies and valuation of mortgage servicing rights involve judgments as to expected
events and are inherently forward-looking statements. Assessments that BOK Financial's acquisitions and other growth
endeavors will be profitable are necessary statements of belief as to the outcome of future events, based in part on information
provided by others that BOK Financial has not independently verified. These statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent,
likelihood and degree of occurrence. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what is expressed,
implied, or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Internal and external factors that might cause such a difference
include, but are not limited to changes in commodity prices, interest rates and interest rate relationships, demand for products
and services, the degree of competition by traditional and nontraditional competitors, changes in banking regulations, tax laws,
prices, levies, and assessments, the impact of technological advances and trends in customer behavior as well as their ability to
repay loans. BOK Financial and its affiliates undertake no obligation to update, amend, or clarify forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Legal Notice
As used in this report, the term “BOK Financial” and such terms as “the Company,” “the Corporation,” “our,” “we” and “us”
may refer to one or more of the consolidated subsidiaries or all of them taken as a whole. All these terms are used for
convenience only and are not intended as a precise description of any of the separate companies, each of which manages its
own affairs.
73
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
Market risk is a broad term for the risk of economic loss due to adverse changes in the fair value of a financial instrument.
These changes may be the result of various factors, including interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices or equity
prices. Financial instruments that are subject to market risk can be classified either as held for trading or held for purposes other
than trading. Market risk excludes changes in fair value due to credit of the individual issuers of financial instruments.
BOK Financial is subject to market risk primarily through the effect of changes in interest rates on both its assets held for
purposes other than trading and trading assets. The effects of other changes, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices
or equity prices do not pose significant market risk to BOK Financial. BOK Financial has no material investments in assets that
are affected by changes in foreign exchange rates or equity prices. Energy and agricultural product derivative contracts, which
are affected by changes in commodity prices, are matched against offsetting contracts as previously discussed.
The Asset/Liability Committee is responsible for managing market risk in accordance with policy limits established by the
Board of Directors. The Committee monitors projected variation in net interest revenue, net income and economic value of
equity due to specified changes in interest rates. These limits also set maximum levels for short-term borrowings, short-term
assets, public funds and brokered deposits and establish minimum levels for un-pledged assets, among other things. Further, the
Board approved market risk limits for fixed income trading, mortgage pipeline and mortgage servicing assets inclusive of
economic hedge benefits. Exposure is measured daily and compliance is reviewed monthly. Deviations from the Board
approved limits, which periodically occur throughout the reporting period, may require management to develop and execute
plans to reduce exposure. These plans are subject to escalation to and approval by the Board.
The simulations used to manage market risk are based on numerous assumptions regarding the effects of changes in interest
rates on the timing and extent of repricing characteristics, future cash flows and customer behavior. These assumptions are
inherently uncertain and, as a result, models cannot precisely estimate or precisely predict the impact of higher or lower interest
rates. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, market
conditions and management strategies, among other factors.
Interest Rate Risk – Other than Trading
As previously noted in the Net Interest Revenue section of this report, management has implemented strategies to manage the
Company’s balance sheet to have relatively limited exposure to changes in interest rates over a twelve-month period. The
effectiveness of these strategies in managing the overall interest rate risk is evaluated through the use of an asset/liability
model. BOK Financial performs a sensitivity analysis to identify more dynamic interest rate risk exposures, including
embedded option positions, on net interest revenue. A simulation model is used to estimate the effect of changes in interest rates
on our performance across multiple interest rate scenarios. Our current internal policy limit for net interest revenue variation
due to a 200 basis point parallel change in market interest rates over twelve months is a maximum decline of 5%. The results of
a 200 basis point decrease in interest rates in the current low-rate environment are not meaningful. Until such time as it
becomes meaningful, we will instead report the effect of a 50 basis point decrease in interest rates.
The Company’s primary interest rate exposures include the Federal Funds rate, which affects short-term borrowings, and the
prime lending rate and LIBOR, which are the basis for much of the variable rate loan pricing. Additionally, residential
mortgage rates directly affect the prepayment speeds for residential mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing
rights. Derivative financial instruments and other financial instruments used for purposes other than trading are included in this
simulation. In addition, the impact on the level and composition of demand deposit accounts and other core deposit balances
resulting from a significant increase in short-term market interest rates and the overall interest rate environment is likely to be
material. The simulation incorporates assumptions regarding the effects of such changes based on a combination of historical
analysis and expected behavior. The impact of planned growth and new business activities is factored into the simulation
model.
74
Table 36 – Interest Rate Sensitivity
(Dollar in thousands)
200 bp Increase
50 bp Decrease
2017
2016
2017
2016
Anticipated impact over the next twelve months on net interest revenue
$
(2,692)
$
(4,932)
$ (17,805)
$
(18,021)
(0.30)%
(0.60)%
(2.00)%
(2.19)%
BOK Financial is also subjected to market risk through changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights. Changes in the fair
value of mortgage servicing rights are highly dependent on changes in primary mortgage rates offered to borrowers, intermediate-
term interest rates that affect the value of custodial funds, and assumptions about servicing revenues, servicing costs and discount
rates. As primary mortgage rates increase, prepayment speeds slow and the value of our mortgage servicing rights increases. As
primary mortgage rates fall, prepayment speeds increase and the value of our mortgage servicing rights decreases.
We maintain a portfolio of financial instruments, which may include debt securities issued by the U.S. government or its
agencies and interest rate derivative contracts held as an economic hedge of the changes in the fair value of our mortgage
servicing rights. Composition of this portfolio will change based on our assessment of market risk. Changes in the fair value of
residential mortgage-backed securities are highly dependent on changes in secondary mortgage rates required by investors, and
interest rate derivative contracts are highly dependent on changes in other market interest rates. While primary and secondary
mortgage rates generally move in the same direction, the spread between them may widen and narrow due to market conditions
and government intervention. Changes in the forward-looking spread between the primary and secondary rates can cause
significant earnings volatility.
Management performs a stress test to measure market risk due to changes in interest rates inherent in its MSR portfolio and
hedges. The stress test shocks applicable interest rates up and down 50 basis points and calculates an estimated change in fair
value, net of economic hedging activity, that may result. The Board has approved a $20 million market risk limit for mortgage
servicing rights, net of economic hedges.
Table 37 - MSR Asset and Hedge Sensitivity Analysis
(In thousands)
MSR Asset
MSR Hedge
Net Exposure
Trading Activities
December 31,
2017
2016
Up 50 bp
Down 50 bp
Up 50 bp
Down 50 bp
$
25,818
$
(32,856) $
25,233
$
(31,823)
(29,501)
(3,683)
25,021
(7,835)
(29,196)
(3,963)
28,552
(3,271)
The Company bears market risk by originating residential mortgages held for sale ("RMHFS"). RMHFS are generally
outstanding for 60 to 90 days, which represents the typical period from commitment to originate a loan to sale of the closed
loan to an investor. Primary mortgage interest rate changes during this period affect the value of RMHFS commitments and
loans. We use forward sale contracts to mitigate market risk on all closed mortgage loans held for sale and on an estimate of
mortgage loan commitments that are expected to result in closed loans.
A variety of methods are used to monitor market risk of mortgage origination activities. These methods include daily marking
of all positions to market value, independent verification of inventory pricing, and revenue sensitivity limits.
Management performs a stress test to measure market risk due to changes in interest rates inherent in the mortgage production
pipeline. The stress test shocks applicable interest rates up and down 50 basis points and calculates an estimated change in fair
value, net of economic hedging activity that may result. The Board has approved a $7 million market risk limit for the
mortgage production pipeline, net of forward sale contracts.
75
Table 38 - Mortgage Pipeline Sensitivity Analysis
(In thousands)
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
2016
Up 50 bp Down 50 bp Up 50 bp Down 50 bp
Average1
Low2
High3
Period End
1 Average represents the simple average of each daily value observed during the reporting period.
2 Low represents least risk of loss in fair value measured as the smallest negative value or the largest positive value observed daily during the reporting period.
3 High represents the greatest risk of loss in fair value measured as the largest negative value or the smallest positive value observed daily during the reporting
(1,040) $ (1,840) $
(6,858)
(2,377)
(1,979)
(2,953)
(1,158)
2,037
1,314
1,815
(263)
(114)
(583)
602
789
23
$
$
period.
BOK Financial enters into trading activities both as an intermediary for customers and for its own account. As an intermediary,
we take positions in securities, generally residential mortgage-backed securities, government agency securities and municipal
bonds. These securities are purchased for resale to customers, which include individuals, corporations, foundations and
financial institutions. On a limited basis, we may also take trading positions in U.S. Treasury securities, residential mortgage-
backed securities, and municipal bonds to enhance returns on securities portfolios. Both of these activities involve interest rate,
liquidity and price risk. BOK Financial has an insignificant exposure to foreign exchange risk and does not take positions in
commodity derivatives.
A variety of methods are used to monitor the interest rate risk of trading activities. These methods include daily marking of all
positions to market value, independent verification of inventory pricing, and position limits for each trading activity. Economic
hedges in either the futures or cash markets may be used to reduce the risk associated with some trading programs.
Management performs a stress test to measure market risk from changes in interest rates on its trading portfolio. The stress test
shocks applicable interest rates up and down 50 basis points and calculates an estimated change in fair value, net of economic
hedging activity that may result. The Board has approved an $8 million market risk limit for the trading portfolio, net of
economic hedges.
Table 39 –Trading Securities Sensitivity Analysis
(In thousands)
Average1
Low2
High3
Period End
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
2016
Up 50 bp Down 50 bp Up 50 bp Down 50 bp
$ (1,702) $
1,799
$ (3,150) $
668
(4,386)
(488)
5,210
146
(1,046)
(6,130)
539
(734)
3,196
7,013
(107)
1,212
1 Average represents the simple average of each daily value observed during the reporting period.
2 Low represents least risk of loss in fair value measured as the smallest negative value or the largest positive value observed daily during the reporting period.
3 High represents the greatest risk of loss in fair value measured as the largest negative value or the smallest positive value observed daily during the reporting
period.
76
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of BOK Financial Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), as amended. Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework,” issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Based on that assessment and
criteria, management has determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2017.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Consolidated Financial Statements of
the Company included in this annual report has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. Their report, which expresses unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, is included in this annual report.
77
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of BOK Financial Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited BOK Financial Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, BOK Financial Corporation (the Company)
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the
COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of BOK Financial Corporation as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and our report dated February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
February 27, 2018
78
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of BOK Financial Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BOK Financial Corporation (the Company) as of
December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in equity,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to
as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(2013 framework), and our report dated February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to
error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1990.
February 27, 2018
79
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Interest and dividend revenue
Loans
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Trading securities
Investment securities
Available for sale securities
Fair value option securities
Restricted equity securities
Interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents
Total interest and dividend revenue
Interest expense
Deposits
Borrowed funds
Subordinated debentures
Total interest expense
Net interest and dividend revenue
Provision for credit losses
Net interest and dividend revenue after provision for credit losses
Other operating revenue
Brokerage and trading revenue
Transaction card revenue
Fiduciary and asset management revenue
Deposit service charges and fees
Mortgage banking revenue
Other revenue
Total fees and commissions
Other gains, net
Gain (loss) on derivatives, net
Loss on fair value option securities, net
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights
Gain on available for sale securities, net
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
Total other operating revenue
Other operating expense
Personnel
Business promotion
Charitable contributions to BOKF Foundation
Professional fees and services
Net occupancy and equipment
Insurance
Data processing and communications
Printing, postage and supplies
Net losses and operating expenses of repossessed assets
Amortization of intangible assets
Mortgage banking costs
Other expense
Total other operating expense
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
Net income attributable to BOK Financial Corporation shareholders
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
Average shares used in computation:
Basic
Diluted
Dividends declared per share
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
81
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2017
$
$
$
$
$
696,479
8,706
17,002
16,121
177,070
16,755
18,490
22,128
972,751
53,803
69,124
8,123
131,050
841,701
(7,000)
848,701
131,601
119,988
162,893
112,075
104,719
52,168
683,444
9,004
779
(2,733)
172
4,428
—
—
—
695,094
573,408
28,877
2,000
51,067
86,477
19,653
146,970
15,689
9,687
6,779
52,856
32,054
1,025,517
518,278
182,593
335,685
1,041
334,644
5.11
5.11
64,745,364
64,806,284
1.77
$
$
$
$
$
581,030
12,658
8,527
16,894
175,321
6,723
17,238
10,726
829,117
40,494
35,336
6,059
81,889
747,228
65,000
682,228
138,377
116,452
135,477
111,499
133,914
51,029
686,748
4,030
(15,685)
(10,555)
(2,193)
11,675
—
—
—
674,020
553,119
26,582
2,000
56,783
80,024
32,489
131,841
15,584
3,359
6,862
61,387
47,560
1,017,590
338,658
106,377
232,281
(387)
232,668
3.53
3.53
65,085,627
65,143,898
1.73
$
$
$
$
$
529,683
13,602
2,240
18,098
174,829
9,264
13,532
5,580
766,828
44,170
14,204
5,100
63,474
703,354
34,000
669,354
129,556
109,579
126,153
109,473
126,002
49,883
650,646
5,702
430
(3,684)
(4,853)
12,058
(2,443)
624
(1,819)
658,480
515,298
27,851
796
40,123
76,016
20,375
122,383
13,498
1,446
4,359
38,813
35,233
896,191
431,643
139,384
292,259
3,694
288,565
4.22
4.21
67,594,689
67,691,658
1.69
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes:
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
Reclassification adjustments included in earnings:
Interest revenue, Investment securities, Taxable securities
Interest expense, Subordinated debentures
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
Gain on available for sale securities, net
Other comprehensive loss, before income taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
335,685
$
232,281
$
292,259
(26,152)
(41,521)
(46,803)
—
—
—
(4,428)
(30,580)
(11,923)
(18,657)
(112)
—
—
(11,675)
(53,308)
(20,754)
(32,554)
(503)
121
1,819
(12,058)
(57,424)
(22,338)
(35,086)
317,028
199,727
257,173
1,041
(387)
3,694
Comprehensive income attributable to BOK Financial Corp. shareholders
$
315,987
$
200,114
$
253,479
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
82
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents
Trading securities
Investment securities (fair value: 2017 – $480,035; 2016 – $565,493)
Available for sale securities
Fair value option securities
Restricted equity securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Loans
Allowance for loan losses
Loans, net of allowance
Premises and equipment, net
Receivables
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net
Mortgage servicing rights
Real estate and other repossessed assets, net of allowance (2017 – $12,648; 2016 – $9,562)
Derivative contracts
Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
Receivable on unsettled available for sale securities sales
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
Interest-bearing deposits:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total deposits
Funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Accrued interest, taxes and expense
Derivative contracts
Due on unsettled available for sale securities purchases
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock ($.00006 par value; 2,500,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: 2017 –
75,147,686; 2016 – 74,993,407)
Capital surplus
Retained earnings
Treasury stock (shares at cost: 2017 – 9,752,749; 2016 – 9,655,975)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total shareholders’ equity
Non-controlling interests
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
83
December 31,
2017
2016
602,510
1,714,544
462,676
461,793
8,321,578
755,054
320,189
221,378
17,153,424
(230,682)
16,922,742
317,335
442,897
447,430
28,658
252,867
28,437
220,502
316,498
75,980
359,092
32,272,160
$
$
620,846
1,916,651
337,628
546,145
8,676,829
77,046
307,240
301,897
16,989,660
(246,159)
16,743,501
325,849
772,952
448,899
46,931
247,073
44,287
689,872
308,430
7,188
353,017
32,772,281
9,243,338
$
9,235,720
10,250,393
469,158
2,098,416
22,061,305
58,628
516,335
5,134,897
144,677
164,895
171,963
151,198
349,928
28,753,826
10,865,105
425,470
2,221,800
22,748,095
57,929
668,661
4,846,072
144,640
146,704
664,531
6,508
182,784
29,465,924
4
1,035,895
3,048,487
(552,845)
(36,174)
3,495,367
22,967
3,518,334
32,272,160
$
4
1,006,535
2,823,334
(544,052)
(10,967)
3,274,854
31,503
3,306,357
32,772,281
$
$
$
$
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(In thousands)
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Capital
Surplus
Retained
Earnings
Treasury Stock
Shares
Amount
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Non-
Controlling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balance, December 31,
2014
Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Repurchase of common
stock
Share-based
compensation plans:
Stock options exercised
Non-vested shares
awarded, net
Vesting of non-vested
shares
Share-based
compensation
Cash dividends on
common stock
Sale of non-controlling
interest
Capital calls and
distributions, net
Balance, December 31,
2015
Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Repurchase of common
stock
Share-based
compensation plans:
Stock options exercised
Non-vested shares
awarded, net
Vesting of non-vested
shares
Share-based
compensation
Cash dividends on
common stock
Capital calls and
distributions, net
Balance, December 31,
2016
74,004
$
—
—
—
286
240
—
—
—
—
—
74,530
—
—
—
214
249
—
—
—
—
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ 954,644
$2,530,837
4,890
$ (239,979) $
56,673
$
3,302,179
$
34,027
$3,336,206
—
—
—
14,357
925
—
12,083
—
—
—
288,565
—
—
—
—
—
—
(35,086)
— 3,634
(229,540)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
112
(7,646)
—
—
—
—
(115,281)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
288,565
(35,086)
(229,540)
14,357
925
(7,646)
12,083
3,694
292,259
—
—
—
—
—
(35,086)
(229,540)
14,357
925
(7,646)
12,083
(115,281)
—
(115,281)
—
—
5,500
5,500
(6,138)
(6,138)
982,009
2,704,121
8,636
(477,165)
21,587
3,230,556
37,083
3,267,639
232,668
—
—
—
—
—
—
(32,554)
— 1,005
(66,792)
—
—
—
12,465
1,590
—
10,471
—
—
—
—
—
—
15
—
—
—
—
—
(95)
—
—
—
—
—
(113,455)
—
232,668
(32,554)
(66,792)
12,465
1,590
(95)
10,471
(113,455)
(387)
232,281
—
—
(32,554)
(66,792)
12,465
1,590
(95)
10,471
(113,455)
—
—
—
(5,193)
(5,193)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
74,993
$
4
$1,006,535
$2,823,334
9,656
$ (544,052) $
(10,967) $
3,274,854
$
31,503
$3,306,357
84
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(In thousands)
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Capital
Surplus
Retained
Earnings
Treasury Stock
Shares
Amount
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Non-
Controlling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balance, December 31,
2016
Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Repurchase of common
stock
Share-based
compensation plans:
74,993
$
—
—
—
Stock options exercised
100
55
—
—
—
—
Non-vested shares
awarded, net
Vesting of non-vested
shares
Share-based
compensation
Cash dividends on
common stock
Capital calls and
distributions, net
Reclassification of
stranded accumulated
other comprehensive
loss related to tax
reform
Balance, December 31,
2017
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$1,006,535
$2,823,334
9,656
$ (544,052) $
(10,967) $
3,274,854
$
31,503
$3,306,357
—
—
—
5,758
—
—
23,602
334,644
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(116,041)
—
—
—
80
—
—
17
—
—
—
—
—
(7,403)
—
—
(1,390)
—
—
—
—
(18,657)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
334,644
(18,657)
(7,403)
5,758
—
(1,390)
23,602
(116,041)
1,041
335,685
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(18,657)
(7,403)
5,758
—
(1,390)
23,602
(116,041)
—
(9,577)
(9,577)
—
—
—
6,550
—
—
(6,550)
—
—
—
75,148
$
4
$1,035,895
$3,048,487
9,753
$ (552,845) $
(36,174) $
3,495,367
$
22,967
$3,518,334
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
85
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for credit losses
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights due to market changes
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights due to loan runoff
Net unrealized losses from derivative contracts
Depreciation and amortization
Share-based compensation
Net amortization of securities discounts and premiums
Net realized gains on financial instruments and other net gains
Net gain on mortgage loans held for sale
Mortgage loans originated for sale
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights
Change in trading and fair value option securities
Change in receivables
Change in other assets
Change in accrued interest, taxes and expense
Change in other liabilities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities
Proceeds from maturities or redemptions of investment securities
Proceeds from maturities or redemptions of available for sale securities
Purchases of investment securities
Purchases of available for sale securities
Change in amount receivable on unsettled securities sales
Loans originated, net of principal collected
Net payments on derivative asset contracts
Proceeds from disposition of assets
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Purchases of assets
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net change in demand deposits, transaction deposits and savings accounts
Net change in time deposits
Net change in other borrowed funds
Repayment of subordinated debentures
Issuance of subordinated debentures, net of issuance costs
Change in amount due on unsettled security purchases
Issuance of common and treasury stock, net
Net change in derivative margin accounts
Net payments or proceeds on derivative liability contracts
Sale of non-controlling interests
Repurchase of common stock
Dividends paid
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
86
2017
Year Ended
2016
2015
$
335,685
$
232,281
$
292,259
(7,000)
(172)
33,527
3,704
54,466
23,602
28,693
(2,828)
(47,159)
(3,286,873)
3,405,890
(39,149)
(804,204)
321,880
(5,506)
18,191
182,184
214,931
1,309,215
112,022
1,841,217
(32,972)
(2,845,557)
(68,792)
(78,232)
479,409
274,029
—
(250,783)
739,556
(563,406)
(123,384)
(10,909)
—
—
144,690
4,368
(17,726)
(485,119)
—
(7,403)
(116,041)
(1,174,930)
(220,443)
2,537,497
2,317,054
65,000
2,193
40,744
11,234
47,016
10,471
41,643
(13,011)
(63,636)
(6,117,417)
6,193,587
(71,405)
149,921
(603,861)
(49,565)
44,269
(11,413)
(91,949)
899,381
86,847
1,740,226
(41,590)
(2,333,740)
33,005
(621,605)
(103,668)
198,922
56,017
(199,802)
(286,007)
1,277,285
(216,084)
(606,476)
(226,550)
144,615
(10,389)
12,455
(28,806)
106,051
—
(66,792)
(113,455)
271,854
(106,102)
2,643,599
2,537,497
34,000
4,853
28,064
964
37,918
12,083
55,145
(15,212)
(75,780)
(6,372,956)
6,446,659
(79,546)
(69,298)
(6,943)
(29,548)
17,517
15,756
295,935
1,600,380
72,664
1,542,517
(25,132)
(3,300,601)
34,066
(1,681,035)
(156,419)
195,760
(18,098)
(265,406)
(2,001,304)
149,951
(202,652)
2,547,688
(121,810)
—
(273,643)
6,711
(43,226)
149,428
5,500
(229,540)
(115,281)
1,873,126
167,757
2,475,842
2,643,599
$
$
$
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for taxes
Net loans and bank premises transferred to repossessed real estate and other assets
Residential mortgage loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies that became eligible
for repurchase during the period
Conveyance of other real estate owned guaranteed by U.S. government agencies
$
$
$
$
$
127,513
121,697
7,367
148,107
40,528
$
$
$
$
$
82,876
79,883
36,391
120,406
68,873
$
$
$
$
$
66,091
101,991
12,592
123,383
110,505
2017
Year Ended
2016
2015
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
87
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements of BOK Financial Corporation (“BOK Financial” or “the Company”) have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"), including
interpretations of U.S. GAAP issued by federal banking regulators and general practices of the banking industry. The
Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of BOK Financial and its subsidiaries, principally BOKF, NA, BOK
Financial Securities, Inc., The Milestone Group, Inc. and Cavanal Hill Distributors, Inc. All significant intercompany
transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests and results of operations of
variable interest entities (“VIEs”) when BOK Financial is determined to be the primary beneficiary. Variable interest entities
are generally defined as entities that either do not have sufficient equity to finance their activities without support from other
parties or whose equity investors lack a controlling financial interest. See additional discussion of variable interest entities at
Note 14 following.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Check card revenue of $19.3 million
in 2016 and $19.0 million in 2015 were reclassified from transaction card revenue to deposit service charges and fees.
Nature of Operations
BOK Financial, through its subsidiaries, provides a wide range of financial services to commercial and industrial customers,
other financial institutions, municipalities, and consumers. These services include depository and cash management; lending
and lease financing; mortgage banking; securities brokerage, trading and underwriting; and personal and corporate trust.
BOKF, NA ("the Bank") operates as Bank of Oklahoma primarily in the Tulsa and Oklahoma City metropolitan areas of the
state of Oklahoma and Bank of Texas primarily in the Dallas, Fort Worth and Houston metropolitan areas of the state of
Texas. In addition, BOKF, NA does business as Bank of Albuquerque in Albuquerque, New Mexico; Colorado State Bank and
Trust in Denver, Colorado; Bank of Arizona in Phoenix, Arizona; Mobank in Kansas City, Missouri/Kansas and Bank of
Arkansas in Northwest Arkansas. BOKF, NA also operates the TransFund electronic funds network, Cavanal Hill Investment
Management, and BOK Financial Asset Management, Inc.
Use of Estimates
Preparation of BOK Financial's Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates of future economic
activities, including loan collectability, prepayments and cash flows from customer accounts. These estimates are based upon
current conditions and information available to management. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.
Acquisitions
Assets and liabilities acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date. The
purchase price includes consideration paid at closing and the estimated fair value of contingent consideration that will be paid
in the future, subject to achieving defined performance criteria. Premiums and discounts assigned to interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities are amortized over the lives of the acquired assets and liabilities on either an individual instrument or
pool basis. Provision for credit losses is recognized for changes in credit quality after the acquisition date. Goodwill is
recognized as the excess of the purchase price over the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
Consolidated Statements of Earnings include the results of operations from the acquisition date.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets generally result from business combinations and are evaluated for each of BOK Financial's
reporting units for impairment annually or more frequently if conditions indicate impairment. The evaluation of possible
impairment of goodwill and intangible assets involves significant judgment based upon short-term and long-term projections of
future performance.
88
Reporting units are defined by the Company as significant lines of business within each operating segment. This definition is
consistent with the manner in which the chief operating decision maker assesses the performance of the Company and makes
decisions concerning the allocation of resources. The Company qualitatively assesses whether it is more likely than not that the
fair value of the reporting units are less than their carrying value, including goodwill. Reporting unit carrying value includes
sufficient capital to exceed regulatory requirements. This assessment includes consideration of relevant events and
circumstances including but not limited to macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, the financial and stock
performance of the Company and other relevant factors.
If the Company concludes based on the qualitative assessment that goodwill may be impaired, a quantitative one-step
impairment test will be applied to goodwill at all reporting units. The quantitative analysis compares the fair value of the
reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. The fair value of each reporting unit is estimated by the discounted
future earnings method. Goodwill is considered impaired if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value of
the reporting unit, including goodwill.
Intangible assets are generally composed of customer relationships, naming rights, non-compete agreements and core deposit
premiums. They are amortized using accelerated or straight-line methods, as appropriate, over the estimated benefit periods.
These periods range from 3 years to 20 years. The net book values of identifiable intangible assets are evaluated for impairment
when economic conditions indicate impairment may exist.
Cash Equivalents
Due from banks, funds sold (generally federal funds sold for one day), resell agreements (which generally mature within one to
30 days) and investments in money market funds are considered cash equivalents.
Securities
Securities are identified as trading, investment (held to maturity) or available for sale at the time of purchase based upon the
intent of management, liquidity and capital requirements, regulatory limitations and other relevant factors. Trading securities,
which are acquired for profit through resale, are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in current period
earnings. Investment securities are carried at amortized cost. Amortization is computed by methods that approximate level yield
and is adjusted for changes in prepayment estimates. Securities identified as available for sale are carried at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses are recorded, net of deferred income taxes, as accumulated other comprehensive income in
shareholders' equity. Available for sale securities are separately identified as pledged to creditors if the creditor has the right to
sell or re-pledge the collateral.
The purchase or sale of securities is recognized on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are based
upon specific identification of the security sold. A receivable or payable is recognized for subsequent transaction
settlement. Securities meeting certain criteria may also be transferred from the available for sale classification to the investment
securities portfolio at fair value on the date of transfer. The unrealized gain or loss at the date of transfer is retained in
accumulated other comprehensive income and in the carrying value of the investment securities portfolio. Such amounts are
amortized over the estimated remaining life of the security as an adjustment to yield, offsetting the related amortization of the
premium or accretion of the discount on the transferred securities.
On a quarterly basis, the Company performs separate evaluations of impaired debt investment and available for sale securities
and equity available for sale securities to determine if the decline in fair value below the amortized cost is other-than-
temporary.
For debt securities, management determines whether it intends to sell or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to
sell impaired securities. This determination considers current and forecasted liquidity requirements and securities portfolio
management. If the Company intends to sell or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the impaired debt
security, a charge is recognized against earnings for the entire unrealized loss. For all impaired debt securities for which there is
no intent or expected requirement to sell, the evaluation considers all available evidence to assess whether it is more likely than
not that all amounts due would not be collected according to the security's contractual terms. Impairment of debt securities
rated investment grade by all nationally-recognized rating agencies is considered temporary unless specific contrary
information is identified. Impairment of debt securities rated below investment grade by at least one of the nationally
recognized rating agencies is evaluated based on projections of estimated cash flows. Any expected credit loss due to the
inability to collect all amounts due according to the security's contractual terms is recognized as a charge against earnings. Any
remaining unrealized loss related to other factors would be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of taxes.
89
For equity securities, management evaluates various factors including cause, severity and duration of the decline in value of the
security and prospects for recovery, as well as the Company's intent and ability not to sell the security until the fair value
exceeds amortized cost. If an unrealized loss is determined to be other-than-temporary, a charge is recognized against earnings
for the difference between the security's amortized cost and fair value.
BOK Financial may elect to carry certain securities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in current period
income. These securities are held with the intent that gains or losses will offset changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing
rights or certain derivative instruments.
Restricted equity securities represent equity interests the Company is required to hold in the Federal Reserve Banks and Federal
Home Loan Banks. Restricted equity securities are carried at cost as these securities do not have a readily determined fair value
because ownership of these shares is restricted and they lack a market.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments may be used by the Company as part of its internal risk management programs or may be offered to
customers. All derivative instruments are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are generally reported in income as they
occur. The determination of fair value of derivative instruments considers changes in interest rates, commodity prices and
foreign exchange rates. Credit risk is also considered in determining fair value. Deterioration in the credit rating of customers
or other counterparties reduces the fair value of asset contracts. Deterioration of our credit rating could decrease the fair value
of our derivative liabilities.
When bilateral netting agreements or similar agreements exist between the Company and its counterparties that create a single
legal claim or obligation to pay or receive the net amount in settlement of the individual derivative contracts, the Company
reports derivative assets and liabilities on a net by derivative contract by counterparty basis.
Derivative contracts may also require the Company to provide or receive cash margin as collateral for derivative assets and
liabilities. Derivative assets and liabilities are reported net of cash margin when certain conditions are met. In addition,
derivative contracts executed with customers under Customer Risk Management Programs may be secured by non-cash
collateral in conjunction with a credit agreement with that customer. Access to collateral in the event of default is reasonably
assured.
Derivative instruments may be designated as cash flow hedges of variable rate assets or liabilities, or of anticipated
transactions. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income to the extent they are effective. The amount recorded in other comprehensive income is
reclassified to earnings in the same periods as the hedged cash flows impact earnings. The ineffective portion of changes in fair
value is reported in current earnings.
BOK Financial may use derivative instruments in managing its interest rate sensitivity, as part of its economic hedge of the
changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights and to mitigate the market risk of holding trading securities. Changes in
the fair value of derivative instruments used in managing interest rate sensitivity and as part of its economic hedge of changes
in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights are included in Other Operating Revenue - Gain (loss) on derivatives, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used to mitigate the market risk of
holding trading securities are included in Operating Revenue - Brokerage and trading revenue.
BOK Financial also enters into mortgage loan commitments that are considered derivative contracts. Forward sales contracts
that have not been designated as hedging instruments are used to economically hedge these mortgage loan commitments as
well as mortgage loans held for sale. Mortgage loan commitments are carried at fair value based upon quoted prices. Changes
in the fair value of mortgage loan commitments, mortgage loans held for sale and forward sales contracts are reported in Other
Operating Revenue - Mortgage Banking Revenue.
90
BOK Financial offers programs that permit its customers to manage various risks, including fluctuations in energy, cattle and
other agricultural products, interest rates and foreign exchange rates with derivative contracts. Customers may also manage
interest rate risk through interest rate swaps used by the borrower to modify interest rate terms of their loans or to-be-
announced securities used by our mortgage banking customers to hedge their loan production. Derivative contracts are
executed between the customers and BOK Financial. Offsetting contracts are executed between BOK Financial and other
selected counterparties to minimize market risk from changes in commodity prices, interest rates or foreign exchange rates. The
counterparty contracts are identical to customer contracts, except for a fixed pricing spread or fee paid to BOK Financial as
profit and compensation for administrative costs and credit risk which is recognized over the life of the contracts and included
in other Operating Revenue - Brokerage and Trading Revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Loans
Loans are either secured or unsecured based on the type of loan and the financial condition of the borrower. Repayment is
generally expected from cash flow or proceeds from the sale of selected assets of the borrower. BOK Financial is exposed to
risk of loss on loans due to the borrower's financial difficulties, which may arise from any number of factors, including
problems within the respective industry or local economic conditions. Access to collateral, in the event of borrower default, is
reasonably assured through adherence to applicable lending laws and through sound lending standards and credit review
procedures. Accounting policies for all loans, excluding residential loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, are as
follows.
Interest is accrued at the applicable interest rate on the outstanding principal amount. Loans are placed on nonaccruing status
when, in the opinion of management, full collection of principal or interest is uncertain. Internally risk graded loans are
individually evaluated for nonaccruing status quarterly. Non-risk graded loans are generally placed on nonaccruing status when
90 days or more past due or within 60 days of being notified of the borrower's bankruptcy filing. Interest previously accrued
but not collected is charged against interest income when the loan is placed on nonaccruing status. Payments received on
nonaccruing loans are applied to principal or recognized as interest income, according to management's judgment as to the
collectability of principal. Loans may be returned to accruing status when, in the opinion of management, full collection of
principal and interest, including principal previously charged off, is probable based on improvements in the borrower's financial
condition or a sustained period of performance.
Loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties may be modified in troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs"). All TDRs are
classified as nonaccruing. Modifications generally consist of extension of payment terms or interest rate concessions and may
result either voluntarily through negotiations with the borrower or involuntarily through court order. Generally, principal and
accrued but unpaid interest is not voluntarily forgiven.
Performing loans may be renewed under the current collateral, debt service ratio and other underwriting standards.
Nonaccruing loans may also be renewed and will remain classified as nonaccruing.
Occasionally, loans, other than residential mortgage loans, may be held for sale in order to manage credit concentration. These
loans are carried at the lower of cost or fair value with gains or losses recognized in gain (loss) on assets.
All loans are charged-off when the loan balance or a portion of the loan balance is no longer supported by the paying capacity
of the borrower or when the required cash flow is reduced in a TDR. The charge-off amount is determined through an
evaluation of available cash resources and collateral value. Internally risk graded loans are evaluated quarterly and charge-offs
are taken in the quarter in which the loss is identified. Non-risk graded loans that are past due between 60 days and 180 days,
based on the loan product type, are charged off. Loans to borrowers whose personal obligation has been discharged through
Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings are charged off within 60 days of notice of the bankruptcy filing, regardless of payment
status.
Loan origination and commitment fees and direct loan acquisition and origination costs are deferred and amortized as an
adjustment to yield over the life of the loan or over the commitment period, as applicable. Amortization does not anticipate loan
prepayments. Net unamortized fees are recognized in full at time of payoff.
91
Qualifying residential mortgage loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies have been sold into GNMA pools. Under
certain performance conditions specified in government programs, the Company has the right, but not the obligation to
repurchase loans from GNMA pools. These loans no longer qualify for sale accounting and are recognized in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. Guaranteed loans are considered to be impaired because we do not expect to receive all principal and interest
based on the loan's contractual terms. The principal balance continues to be guaranteed, however, interest accrues at a curtailed
rate as specified in the programs. The carrying value of these loans is reduced based on an estimate of expected cash flows
discounted at the original note rate plus a liquidity spread. Guaranteed loans may be modified in TDRs in accordance with U.S.
government agency guidelines. Interest continues to accrue at the modified rate. U.S. government guaranteed loans may either
be resold into GNMA pools after a performance period specified by the programs or foreclosed and conveyed to the guarantors.
Loans are disaggregated into portfolio segments and further disaggregated into classes. The portfolio segment is the level at
which the Company develops and documents a systematic method for determining its Allowance for Credits Losses. Classes
are based on the risk characteristics of the loans and the Company's method for monitoring and assessing credit risk.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Accrual for Off-Balance Sheet Credit Risk
The appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses and accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk (collectively "Allowance for
Credit Losses") is assessed by management quarterly based on an ongoing quarterly evaluation of the probable estimated losses
inherent in the portfolio, including probable losses on outstanding loans and unused commitments to provide financing. A
consistent well-documented methodology has been developed and is applied by an independent Credit Administration
department to assure consistency across the Company.
The allowance for loan losses consists of specific allowances attributed to impaired loans that have not yet been charged down
to amounts we expect to recover, general allowances based on estimated loss rates by loan class and nonspecific allowances
based on factors that affect more than one portfolio segment. There were no changes to the methodology for estimating general
allowances during 2017 or 2016.
Loans are considered to be impaired when it becomes probable that BOK Financial will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements. Internally risk graded loans are evaluated individually for
impairment. Substantially all commercial and commercial real estate loans and certain residential mortgage and personal loans
are risk graded based on a quarterly evaluation of the borrowers' ability to repay. Certain commercial loans and most residential
mortgage and personal loans are small balance, homogeneous pools of loans that are not risk graded. Non-risk graded loans are
identified as impaired based on performance status. Generally, non-risk graded loans 90 days or more past due, modified in a
troubled debt restructuring or in bankruptcy are considered to be impaired.
Specific allowances for impaired loans are measured by an evaluation of estimated future cash flows discounted at the loan's
initial effective interest rate or the fair value of collateral for certain collateral dependent loans. The fair value of real property
held as collateral is generally based on third party appraisals that conform to Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice, less estimated selling costs. Appraised values are on an “as-is” basis and generally are not adjusted by the
Company. Updated appraisals are obtained at least annually or more frequently if market conditions indicate collateral values
may have declined. Collateral value of mineral rights is generally determined by our internal staff of engineers based on
projected cash flows from proven oil and gas reserves under existing economic and operating conditions. The value of other
collateral is generally determined by our special assets staff based on projected liquidation cash flows under current market
conditions. Collateral values and available cash resources that support impaired loans are evaluated quarterly. Historical
statistics may be used as a practical way to estimate impairment in limited situations, such as when a collateral dependent loan
is identified as impaired at the end of a reporting period until an appraisal of collateral value is received or a full assessment of
future cash flows is completed. Estimates of future cash flows and collateral values require significant judgments and may be
volatile.
92
General allowances for unimpaired loans are based on an estimated loss rate by loan class. The appropriate historical gross loss
rate for each loan class is determined by the greater of the current loss rate based on the most recent twelve months or a ten-
year average gross loss rate. Recoveries are not directly considered in the estimation of historical loss rates. Recoveries
generally do not follow predictable patterns and are not received until well-after the charge-off date as a result of protracted
legal actions. For risk graded loans, historical gross loss rates are adjusted for changes in risk grading. For each loan class, the
current weighted average risk grade is compared to the long-term weighted average risk grade. This comparison determines
whether credit risk in each loan class is increasing or decreasing. Historical loss rates are adjusted upward or downward in
proportion to changes in average risk grading. General allowances for unimpaired loans also consider inherent risks identified
for each loan class. Inherent risks consider loss rates that most appropriately represent the current credit cycle and other factors
attributable to a specific loan class which have not yet been represented in the historical gross loss rates or risk grading. These
factors include changes in commodity prices or engineering imprecision which may affect the value of reserves that secure our
energy loan portfolio, construction risk that may affect commercial real estate loans, changes in regulations and public policy
that may disproportionately impact health care loans and changes in loan products.
Nonspecific allowances are maintained for risks beyond factors specific to a particular portfolio segment or loan class. These
factors include trends in the economy in our primary lending areas, concentration in large-balance loans and other relevant
factors.
An accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk is included in Other liabilities. The appropriateness of the accrual is determined in
the same manner as the allowance for loan losses.
A provision for credit losses is charged against or credited to earnings in amounts necessary to maintain an appropriate
Allowance for Credit Losses. Recoveries of loans previously charged off are added to the allowance when received.
Real Estate and Other Repossessed Assets
Real estate and other repossessed assets are acquired in partial or total forgiveness of loans. These assets are initially
recognized at cost, which is determined by fair value at date of foreclosure less estimated disposal costs. They are subsequently
carried at the lower of cost or current fair value less estimated disposal costs. Decreases in fair value below cost are recognized
as asset-specific valuation allowances which may be reversed when supported by future increases in fair value. Subsequent
increases in fair value may be used to reduce the allowance but not below zero.
Fair values of real estate are based on “as is” appraisals which are updated at least annually or more frequently for certain asset
types or assets located in certain distressed markets. Fair values based on appraisals are generally considered to be based on
significant other observable inputs. The Company also considers decreases in listing price and other relevant information in
quarterly evaluations and reduces the carrying value of real estate and other repossessed assets when necessary. Fair values
based on list prices and other relevant information are generally considered to be based on significant unobservable inputs.
Additional costs incurred to complete real estate and other repossessed assets may increase the carrying value, up to current fair
value based on “as completed” appraisals. The fair value of mineral rights included in repossessed assets are generally
determined by our internal staff of engineers based on projected cash flows from proven oil and gas reserves under existing
economic and operating conditions. The value of other repossessed assets is generally determined by our special assets staff
based on projected liquidation cash flows under current market conditions.
Income generated by these assets is recognized as received. Operating expenses are recognized as incurred. Gains or losses on
sales of real estate and other repossessed assets are based on the cash proceeds received less the cost basis of the asset, net of
any valuation allowances. The estimated disposal costs of real estate and other repossessed assets are evaluated by the
Company on an annual basis based on actual results.
Transfers of Financial Assets
BOK Financial regularly transfers financial assets as part of its mortgage banking activities and periodically may transfer other
financial assets. Transfers are recorded as sales when the criteria for surrender of control are met.
The Company has elected to carry certain residential mortgage loans held for sale at fair value under the fair value option.
Changes in fair value are recognized in net income as they occur. These loans are reported separately in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and changes in fair value are recorded in other operating revenue - mortgage banking revenue in the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
93
Fair value of conforming residential mortgage loans that will be sold to U.S. government agencies is based on sales
commitments or market quotes considered Level 2 inputs. Fair value of mortgage loans that are unable to be sold to U.S.
government agencies is based on Level 3 inputs using quoted prices of loans that are sold in securitization transactions with a
liquidity discount applied. The fair value is corroborated with an independent third party on at least an annual basis.
BOK Financial retains a repurchase obligation under underwriting representations and warranties related to residential
mortgage loans transferred and generally retains the right to service the loans. The Company may incur a recourse obligation in
limited circumstances. Separate accruals are recognized in Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for repurchase
and recourse obligations. These reserves reflect the estimated amount of probable loss the Company will incur as a result of
repurchasing a loan, indemnifications, and other settlement resolutions.
Repurchases of loans with an origination defect that are also credit impaired are considered collateral dependent and are
initially recognized at net realizable value (appraised value less the cost to sell). The difference between unpaid principal
balance and net realizable value is not accreted. Repurchases of loans with an origination defect that are not credit impaired are
carried at fair value as of the repurchase date. Interest income continues to accrue on these loans and the discount is accreted
over the estimated life of the loan.
The Company may also choose to purchase GNMA loans once certain mandated delinquency criteria are met. The loans that
are eligible and are chosen to be repurchased are initially recognized at fair value based on expected cash flow discounted using
the average agency guaranteed debenture rates, average actual principal loss rates and liquidity premium.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Mortgage servicing rights may be purchased or may be recognized when mortgage loans are originated and sold with servicing
rights retained. All mortgage servicing rights are carried at fair value. Changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings as
they occur.
Mortgage servicing rights are not traded in active markets. A cash flow model is used to determine fair value. Key assumptions
and estimates, including projected prepayment speeds and assumed servicing costs, earnings on escrow deposits, ancillary
income and discount rates, used by this model are based on current market sources. Assumptions used to value mortgage
servicing rights are considered significant unobservable inputs. A separate third party model is used to estimate prepayment
speeds based on interest rates, housing turnover rates, estimated loan curtailment, anticipated defaults and other relevant
factors. The prepayment model is updated daily for changes in market conditions and adjusted to better correlate with actual
performance of BOK Financial's servicing portfolio. Fair value estimates from outside sources are received at least annually to
corroborate the results of the valuation model.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are carried at cost, including capitalized interest when appropriate, less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets
or, for leasehold improvements, over the shorter of the estimated useful lives or remaining lease terms. Useful lives range from
5 years to 40 years for buildings and improvements, 3 years to 10 years for software and 3 years to 10 years for furniture and
equipment. Construction in progress represents facilities construction and data processing systems projects underway that have
not yet been placed into service. Depreciation and amortization begin once the assets are placed into service.
Repair and maintenance costs, including software maintenance and enhancement costs, are charged to expense as incurred.
Software licensing costs are generally charged to expense as incurred. Software licensing costs are capitalized if the contractual
right to take possession of the software exists and it is feasible to take possession without significant penalty. Capitalized costs
are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the software or remaining contractual life of the license.
Premises no longer used by the Company are transferred to real estate and other repossessed assets. The transferred amount is
the lower of cost less accumulated depreciation or fair value less estimated disposal costs as of the transfer date.
Rent expense for leased premises is recognized as incurred over the lease term. The effects of rent holidays, significant rent
escalations and other adjustments to rent payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Ongoing technology projects of significant size or length are reviewed at least annually for impairment. Accumulated costs are
reviewed for projects or components of projects that do not support the value of the asset being developed. Findings of
obsolescence, duplicate effort or other conditions that do not support the recorded value are impaired, with the cost of the
impaired components being charged to current-year earnings.
94
Federal and State Income Taxes
BOK Financial and its subsidiaries file consolidated tax returns. The subsidiaries provide for income taxes on a separate return
basis and remit to BOK Financial amounts determined to be currently payable. BOK Financial is agent for its subsidiaries
under the Company's tax sharing agreements and has no ownership rights to any refunds received for the benefit of its
subsidiaries.
Current income tax expense or benefit is based on an evaluation that considers estimated taxable income, tax credits, and
statutory federal and state income tax rates. The amount of current income tax expense or benefit recognized in any period may
differ from amounts reported to taxing authorities. Annually, tax returns are filed with each jurisdiction where the Company
conducts business and recognized current income tax expense or benefit is adjusted to the filed tax returns.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are based upon the temporary differences between the values of assets and liabilities as
recognized in the financial statements and their related tax basis using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of changes in statutory tax rates on the measurement of deferred
tax assets and liabilities is recognized through income tax expense in the period the change is enacted. A valuation allowance is
provided when it is more likely than not that some portion of the entire deferred tax asset may not be realized.
BOK Financial has unrecognized tax benefits, which are included in accrued current income taxes payable, for the uncertain
portion of recorded tax benefits and related interest. These uncertainties result from the application of complex tax laws, rules,
regulations and interpretations, primarily in state taxing jurisdictions. Unrecognized tax benefits are assessed quarterly and may
be adjusted through current income tax expense in future periods based on changing facts and circumstances, completion of
examinations by taxing authorities or expiration of a statute of limitations. Estimated penalties and interest on uncertain tax
positions are recognized in income tax expense.
Employee Benefit Plans
BOK Financial sponsors a defined benefit cash balance pension plan (“Pension Plan”), a defined contribution plan (“Thrift
Plan”) and employee health care plans. Pension Plan costs, which are based upon actuarial computations of current costs, are
expensed annually. Unrecognized prior service cost and net gains or losses are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period
not to exceed the average remaining service periods of the participants. Employer contributions to the Pension Plan are in
accordance with Federal income tax regulations. Pension Plan benefits were curtailed as of April 1, 2006. No participants may
be added to the Pension Plan and no additional service benefits will be accrued.
BOK Financial recognizes the funded status of its employee benefit plans. For a pension plan, the funded status is the
difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation measured as of the fiscal year-end
date. Adjustments required to recognize the Pension Plan's net funded status are made through accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes.
Employer contributions to the Thrift Plan, which matches employee contributions subject to percentage and years of service
limits, are expensed when incurred. BOK Financial recognizes the expense of health care benefits on the accrual method.
Share-Based Compensation Plans
BOK Financial awards stock options and non-vested common shares as compensation to certain officers. Compensation cost is
generally fixed based on the grant date fair value of the award. The grant date fair value of stock options is based on the Black-
Scholes option pricing model. Stock options generally have graded vesting over 7 years. Each tranche is considered a separate
award for valuation and compensation cost recognition. Grant date fair value of non-vested shares is based on the then-current
market value of BOK Financial common stock. Non-vested shares awarded since January 1, 2013 generally cliff vest in 3 years
and are subject to a two year holding period after vesting. Shares awarded under the Executive Incentive Plan are subject to
downward adjustment at the discretion of the Incentive Compensation Committee. Compensation cost of non-vested shares
granted under the Executive Incentive Plan varies based on changes in the fair value of BOKF common shares.
Compensation cost is recognized as expense over the service period, which is generally the vesting period. Expense is reduced
for estimated forfeitures over the vesting period and adjusted for actual forfeitures as they occur. Stock-based compensation
awarded to certain officers has performance conditions that affect the number of awards granted. Compensation cost is adjusted
based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions.
95
Tax effects of share-based payments are recognized through tax expense. Dividends on non-vested shares that are not subject to
forfeiture are charged to retained earnings..
Other Operating Revenue
Fees and commission revenue is recognized at the time the related services are provided or products are sold and may be
accrued when appropriate. Accrued fees and commissions are reversed against revenue if amounts are subsequently deemed to
be uncollectible. Revenue is recognized on a gross basis whenever we have primary responsibility and risk in providing the
services or products to our customers and on a net basis whenever we act as an agent for products or services of others.
Brokerage and trading revenue includes realized and unrealized gains and losses from securities and derivatives held for trading
purposes and derivatives held for customer risk management programs, including credit losses, commissions earned from the
retail sale of securities, mutual funds and other financial instruments, and underwriting and financial advisory fees.
Transaction card revenue includes merchant discount fees and electronic funds transfer network fees. Merchant discount fees
represent fees paid by customers for account management and electronic processing of transactions. Merchant discount fees are
recognized at the time the customer's transactions are processed or other services are performed. The Company also maintains
the TransFund electronic funds transfer network for the benefit of its members, which includes BOKF, NA. Electronic funds
transfer fees are recognized as electronic transactions are processed on behalf of its members.
Fiduciary and asset management revenue includes fees from asset management, custody, recordkeeping, investment advisory
and administration services. Revenue is recognized on an accrual basis at the time the services are performed and may be based
on either the fair value of the account or the service provided.
Deposit service charges and fees are recognized at least quarterly in accordance with a published deposit account agreements
and disclosure statements for retail accounts or contractual agreements for commercial accounts. Item charges for overdraft or
non-sufficient funds items are recognized as items are presented for payment. Account balance charges and activity fees are
accrued monthly and collected in arrears. Commercial account activity fees may be offset by an earnings credit based on
account balances. Check card fees represent interchange fees paid by a merchant bank for transactions processed from cards
issued by the Company. Check card fees are recognized when transactions are processed. Interchange fees are generally
recognized on a gross basis. Related expenses are generally recognized as Data processing and communications expense.
Newly Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements
The following is a summary of newly adopted and pending accounting pronouncements that may have a more than
insignificant effect on the Company's financial statements.
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2014-09")
On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue by providing a more robust
framework that will give greater consistency and comparability in revenue recognition practices. In the new framework, an
entity recognizes revenue in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for
goods or services. The new model requires the identification of performance obligations included in contracts with customers, a
determination of the transaction price and an allocation of the price to those performance obligations. The entity recognizes
revenue when performance obligations are satisfied. Revenue from financial assets and liabilities is explicitly excluded from
the scope of ASU 2014-09. Management adopted the standard in the first quarter of 2018. There were no significant cumulative
effect adjustments as a result of implementation as of January 1, 2018 as our current revenue recognition policies generally
conform with the principals in ASU 2014-09.
96
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent
Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) ("ASU 2016-08")
On March 17, 2016, the FASB Issued ASU 2016-08 to amend the principal versus agent implementation guidance in ASU
2014-09. The ASU clarifies that an entity should evaluate whether it is the principal or the agent for each specified good or
service promised in a contract with a customer. ASU 2016-08 is effective for the Company for annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Management expects that
interchange fees paid to issuing banks for card transactions processed related to its merchant processing services currently
included in data processing and communication expense, will be netted against the amounts charged to the merchant in
transaction card processing revenue. For 2017, interchange fees related to merchant processing services were approximately
$39 million.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and
Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("ASU 2016-01")
On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 over the recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities.
The update requires equity investments, in general, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in
earnings. It also eliminates the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value
for financial instruments measured at amortized cost, requires entities to use the exit price notion when measuring fair value,
requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in fair value of a liability
resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the fair value option has been elected, requires separate
presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form on the balance sheet or accompanying notes,
clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale
securities in combination with the entity's other deferred tax assets, and simplifies the impairment assessment of equity
investments without readily determinable fair values. The ASU is effective for the Company for interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2017. Upon adoption, unrealized gains and losses from equity securities will be reclassified from
other comprehensive income to retained earnings. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $2.7 million of net unrealized
gains included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2016-02")
On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 to increase transparency and comparability by recognizing lease assets
and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Lessees will be required to
recognize an obligation for future lease payments measured on a discounted basis and a right-of-use asset. The ASU is effective
for the Company for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires transition through a modified
retrospective approach for leases existing at or entered into after January 1, 2017. The Company currently estimates that
implementation of ASU 2016-02 will increase reported right of use assets and liabilities by approximately $100 million to $150
million.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to
Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09")
On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 to simplify multiple aspects of accounting for employee share-based
payment transactions including accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements. The ASU
became effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those
annual reporting periods. Implementation of ASU 2016-09 decreased tax expense $2.8 million in 2017.
97
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Assets Measured at
Amortized Cost ("ASU 2016-13")
On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 in order to provide more timely recording of credit losses on loans and other
financial instruments. The ASU adds an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss ("CECL") model) that is
based on expected credit losses rather than incurred credit losses. It requires measurement of all expected credit losses for
financial assets carried at amortized cost, including loans and investment securities, based on historical experience, current
conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. ASU 2016-13 also changes the recognition of other-than-temporary
impairment of available for sale securities to an allowance methodology from a direct write-down methodology. ASU 2016-13
will be effective for the Company for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. ASU
2016-13 will be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting
period in which the guidance is effective. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-13 will have on the
Company's financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash
Receipts and Cash Payments ("ASU 2016-15")
On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, which amends guidance in ASC 230 on the classification of certain cash
receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendments address eight cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 is
effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Entities generally must
apply the guidance retrospectively to all periods presented. Adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material impact
on the Company's financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting
for Hedging Activities ("ASU 2017-12")
On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, which amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation
requirements in ASC 815 in order to improve transparency and understandability of information and reduce the complexity.
The update expands the types of transactions eligible for hedge accounting, eliminates the requirement to separately measure
and present hedge ineffectiveness, simplifies hedge effectiveness assessments and updates documentation and presentation
requirements. The update allows the reclassification of certain debt securities from held to maturity to available for sale if the
debt security is eligible to be hedged under the last-of-layer method. ASU 2017-12 is effective for the Company for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein; however, early adoption is permitted. The Company is
evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-12 will have on the Company's financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220):
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("ASU 2018-02")
On February 10, 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive
income to retained earnings for the tax effect of temporary differences originated through comprehensive income resulting from
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "stranded tax effects"). ASU 2018-02 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2018-02 and reclassified $6.6
million of stranded tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.
98
(2) Securities
Trading Securities
The fair value and net unrealized gain (loss) included in trading securities is as follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Fair Value
Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Fair Value
Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
U.S. government agency debentures
$
21,196
$
8
$
6,234
$
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
Asset-backed securities
Other trading securities
Total trading securities
Investment Securities
392,673
13,559
23,885
11,363
(517)
83
(26)
4
310,067
14,427
—
6,900
$
462,676
$
(448) $
337,628
$
(4)
635
50
—
57
738
The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2017
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Gross Unrealized
Gain
Loss
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
$
228,186
$
230,349
$
2,967
$
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities – Other
Other debt securities
Total investment securities
15,891
217,716
16,242
233,444
446
17,095
$
461,793
$
480,035
$
20,508
$
(804)
(95)
(1,367)
(2,266)
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
$
320,364
$
321,225
$
2,272
$
(1,411)
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities – Other
Other debt securities
Total investment securities
20,777
205,004
21,473
222,795
767
18,115
(71)
(324)
$
546,145
$
565,493
$
21,154
$
(1,806)
December 31, 2016
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Gross Unrealized
Gain
Loss
99
The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities at December 31, 2017, by contractual maturity, are as shown in the
following table (dollars in thousands):
Less than
One Year
One to
Five Years
Six to
Ten Years
Over
Ten Years
Total
Weighted
Average
Maturity²
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities:
Carrying value
Fair value
Nominal yield¹
Other debt securities:
Carrying value
Fair value
Nominal yield
Total fixed maturity securities:
Carrying value
Fair value
Nominal yield
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Carrying value
Fair value
Nominal yield4
Total investment securities:
Carrying value
Fair value
Nominal yield
$
102,569
$
102,414
$
74,738
74,467
$
14,929
15,538
35,950
37,930
$
228,186
230,349
1.82%
2.34%
5.06%
5.19%
2.73%
$
$
13,996
14,058
51,502
53,827
$
135,233
$
149,517
16,985
16,042
$
217,716
233,444
4.24%
4.75%
5.69%
4.36%
5.27%
$
116,565
$
126,240
$
150,162
$
116,472
128,294
165,055
52,935
53,972
$
445,902
463,793
2.11%
3.32%
5.63%
4.92%
3.97%
$
15,891
16,242
2.76%
$
461,793
480,035
3.93%
3.51
6.23
4.83
³
1 Calculated on a taxable equivalent basis using a 39% effective tax rate.
2 Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without
penalty.
3 The average expected lives of residential mortgage-backed securities were 4.8 years based upon current prepayment assumptions.
4 The nominal yield on residential mortgage-backed securities is based upon prepayment assumptions at the purchase date. Actual yields earned may
differ significantly based upon actual prepayments. See Quarterly Financial Summary - Unaudited for current yields on the investment securities
portfolio.
100
Available for Sale Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of available for sale securities are as follows (in thousands):
U.S. Treasury securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. government agencies:
FNMA
FHLMC
GNMA
Total U.S. government agencies
Private issue
Total residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Other debt securities
Perpetual preferred stock
Equity securities and mutual funds
Total available for sale securities
U.S. Treasury securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. government agencies:
FNMA
FHLMC
GNMA
Total U.S. government agencies
Private issue
Total residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Other debt securities
Perpetual preferred stock
Equity securities and mutual funds
Total available for sale securities
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
December 31, 2017
Gross Unrealized
Gain
Loss
OTTI
$
1,000
$
1,000
$
27,182
27,080
— $
181
— $
(283)
3,021,551
1,545,971
787,626
2,997,563
1,531,009
780,580
5,355,148
5,309,152
74,311
93,221
5,429,459
5,402,373
2,858,885
2,834,961
25,500
12,562
14,487
25,481
15,767
14,916
11,549
3,148
1,607
16,304
19,301
35,605
1,963
50
3,205
515
(35,537)
(18,110)
(8,653)
(62,300)
—
(62,300)
(25,887)
(69)
—
(86)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(391)
(391)
—
—
—
—
$ 8,369,075
$
8,321,578
$
41,519
$
(88,625) $
(391)
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
December 31, 2016
Gross Unrealized
Gain
Loss
OTTI
$
1,000
$
999
$
41,050
40,993
— $
343
(1) $
(400)
3,062,525
1,534,451
878,375
3,055,676
1,531,116
873,594
5,475,351
5,460,386
101,192
115,535
5,576,543
5,575,921
3,035,750
3,017,933
4,400
15,561
17,424
4,152
18,474
18,357
25,066
8,475
2,259
35,800
14,577
50,377
5,472
—
2,913
1,060
(31,915)
(11,810)
(7,040)
(50,765)
(16)
(50,781)
(23,289)
(248)
—
(127)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(218)
(218)
—
—
—
—
$
8,691,728
$
8,676,829
$
60,165
$
(74,846) $
(218)
101
The amortized cost and fair values of available for sale securities at December 31, 2017, by contractual maturity, are as shown in the
following table (dollars in thousands):
Less than
One Year
One to
Five Years
Six to
Ten Years
Over
Ten Years
Total
Weighted
Average
Maturity5
U.S. Treasury securities:
Amortized cost
Fair value
Nominal yield
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities:
Amortized cost
Fair value
Nominal yield¹
Commercial mortgage-backed securities:
Amortized cost
Fair value
Nominal yield
Other debt securities:
Amortized cost
Fair value
Nominal yield
Total fixed maturity securities:
Amortized cost
Fair value
Nominal yield
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Amortized cost
Fair value
Nominal yield4
Perpetual preferred stock. equity securities
and mutual funds:
Amortized cost
Fair value
Nominal yield
Total available-for-sale securities:
Amortized cost
Fair value
Nominal yield
$
— $
— $
$
1,000
1,000
0.87%
9,008
9,022
—
—%
2,680
2,811
3.45%
6.04%
—
—%
—
—
—%
$
—
—
—%
15,494
15,247
2.26% 6
1,000
1,000
0.87%
27,182
27,080
3.03%
22,742
22,667
970,611
965,099
1,604,465
1,590,107
261,067
257,088
2,858,885
2,834,961
1.49%
1.93%
2.03%
2.03%
1.99%
—
—
—%
—
—
—%
—
—
—%
25,500
25,481
1.59%
25,500
25,481
1.59%
0.04
9.15
7.17
14.68
$
32,750
32,689
$
973,291
$ 1,604,465
$
302,061
$
2,912,567
7.25
967,910
1,590,107
297,816
2,888,522
2.01%
1.94%
2.03%
2.01%
2.00%
2
³
$
5,429,459
5,402,373
2.04%
$
27,049
30,683
—%
$
8,369,075
8,321,578
2.02%
1 Calculated on a taxable equivalent basis using a 39% effective tax rate.
2 The average expected lives of mortgage-backed securities were 4.2 years based upon current prepayment assumptions.
3 Primarily common stock and preferred stock of corporate issuers with no stated maturity.
4 The nominal yield on mortgage-backed securities is based upon prepayment assumptions at the purchase date. Actual yields earned may differ
significantly based upon actual prepayments. See Quarterly Financial Summary –– Unaudited following for current yields on available for sale
securities portfolio.
5 Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities, because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without
penalty.
6 Nominal yield on municipal and other tax-exempt securities and other debt securities with contractual maturity dates over ten years are based on
variable rates which generally are reset within 35 days.
102
Sales of available for sale securities resulted in gains and losses as follows (in thousands):
Proceeds
Gross realized gains
Gross realized losses
Related federal and state income tax expense
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
1,309,215
$
899,381
$
1,600,380
10,223
(5,795)
1,722
11,696
(21)
4,542
15,849
(3,791)
4,691
A summary of investment and available for sale securities that have been pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements, public trust
funds on deposit and for other purposes, as required by law was as follows (in thousands):
Investment:
Carrying value
Fair value
Available for sale:
Amortized cost
Fair value
The secured parties do not have the right to sell or re-pledge these securities.
December 31,
2017
2016
$
226,852
$
229,429
322,208
323,808
7,151,468
7,089,346
7,353,116
7,327,470
103
Temporarily Impaired Securities as of December 31, 2017
(In thousands)
Investment:
Municipal and other tax-exempt
securities
U.S. government agency residential
mortgage-backed securities – Other
Other debt securities
Total investment securities
Available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt
securities
Residential mortgage-backed
securities:
U.S. government agencies:
FNMA
FHLMC
GNMA
Total U.S. agencies
Private issue1
Total residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
guaranteed by U.S. government
agencies
Other debt securities
Perpetual preferred stock
Equity securities and mutual funds
Number
of
Securities
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
100
$
145,960
$
643
$
5,833
$
161
$
151,793
$
804
1
49
—
20,091
—
1,238
3,356
3,076
150
$
166,051
$
1,881
$
12,265
$
95
129
385
3,356
23,167
$
178,316
$
95
1,367
2,266
Number
of
Securities
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
19
12,765
18
4,802
265
17,567
113
69
27
209
8
1,203,041
863,778
201,887
9,618
7,297
1,452
824,029
385,816
248,742
2,268,706
18,367
1,458,587
5,898
391
—
25,919
10,813
7,201
43,933
—
2,027,070
1,249,594
450,629
3,727,293
5,898
—
283
35,537
18,110
8,653
62,300
391
217
2,274,604
18,758
1,458,587
43,933
3,733,191
62,691
185
2
—
111
1,465,703
19,959
—
911
11,824
652,296
14,063
2,117,999
25,887
41
—
7
472
—
2,203
28
—
79
20,431
—
3,114
69
—
86
89,016
Total available for sale securities
1 Includes securities for which an unrealized loss remains in AOCI after an other-than-temporary credit loss has been recognized in income.
$ 3,773,942
$ 5,892,302
$ 2,118,360
30,648
58,368
534
$
$
$
104
Temporarily Impaired Securities as of December 31, 2016
(In thousands)
Number
of
Securities
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Investment:
Municipal and other tax- exempt
securities
U.S. government agency residential
mortgage-backed securities – Other
Other debt securities
Total investment securities
151
$
219,892
$
1,316
$
4,333
$
95
$
224,225
$
1,411
1
41
4,358
11,820
71
322
—
855
193
$
236,070
$
1,709
$
5,188
$
—
2
97
4,358
12,675
71
324
$
241,258
$
1,806
Number
of
Securities
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
1
$
999
$
1
$
— $
— $
999
$
24
15,666
22
4,689
378
20,355
91
58
31
180
6
1,787,644
964,017
548,637
3,300,298
7,931
30,238
11,210
6,145
47,593
174
72,105
18,307
25,796
116,208
13,508
1,677
1,859,749
600
895
982,324
574,433
3,172
3,416,506
60
21,439
1
400
31,915
11,810
7,040
50,765
234
186
3,308,229
47,767
129,716
3,232
3,437,945
50,999
Available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt
securities
Residential mortgage-backed
securities:
U. S. government agencies:
FNMA
FHLMC
GNMA
Total U.S. agencies
Private issue1
Total residential mortgage-backed
securities
Commercial mortgage-backed
securities guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Other debt securities
Perpetual preferred stock
Equity securities and mutual funds
171
2
—
104
1,904,584
22,987
—
—
2,127
—
—
41
38,875
4,152
—
817
302
248
—
86
1,943,459
23,289
4,152
—
2,944
248
—
127
75,064
Total available for sale securities
1 Includes securities for which an unrealized loss remains in AOCI after an other-than-temporary credit loss has been recognized in income.
$ 5,409,854
$ 5,231,605
178,249
70,818
4,246
488
$
$
$
$
Based on separate evaluations of impaired debt and equity securities, including perpetual preferred stocks, as of December 31, 2017,
the Company does not intend to sell any impaired available for sale securities before fair value recovers to the current amortized cost
and it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will not be required to sell impaired securities before fair value recovers, which may
be maturity.
No other-than-temporary impairment losses were recorded in earnings during 2017 and none were recorded in 2016. Cumulative
other-than-temporary impairment on available for sale securities was $55 million at December 31, 2017.
105
Fair Value Option Securities
Fair value option securities represent securities which the Company has elected to carry at fair value and are separately identified on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in the fair value recognized in earnings as they occur. Certain residential mortgage-
backed securities issued by U.S. government agencies and derivative contracts are held as an economic hedge of the mortgage
servicing rights.
The fair value and net unrealized gain (loss) included in Fair value option securities is as follows (in thousands):
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
$
755,054
$
(1,877) $
77,046
$
(1,777)
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Fair Value
Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Fair Value
Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Restricted Equity Securities
Restricted equity securities include stock we are required to hold as members of the Federal Reserve system and the Federal Home
Loan Banks ("FHLB"). Restricted equity securities are carried at cost as these securities do not have a readily determined fair value
because ownership of these shares is restricted and they lack a market. A summary of restricted equity securities follows (in
thousands):
Federal Reserve Bank stock
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
Other
Total
December 31,
2017
2016
$
$
40,746
$
279,200
243
36,498
270,541
201
320,189
$
307,240
106
(3) Derivatives
The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative contracts recorded as “derivative contracts” assets and liabilities in
the balance sheet at December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
Assets
Notional1
Gross
Fair
Value
Netting
Adjustments
Net Fair
Value
Before
Cash
Collateral
Cash
Collateral
Fair Value
Net of Cash
Collateral
Customer risk management programs:
Interest rate contracts
To-be-announced residential mortgage-
backed securities
Interest rate swaps
Energy contracts
Agricultural contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Equity option contracts
$ 12,347,542
$ 23,606
$
(18,096) $
5,510
$
— $
1,478,944
28,278
1,190,067
103,044
53,238
1,576
132,397
129,551
99,633
5,503
—
(47,873)
(960)
—
—
28,278
55,171
616
129,551
5,503
(4,964)
(196)
—
(448)
(920)
Total customer risk management programs
15,301,821
291,558
(66,929)
224,629
(6,528)
Internal risk management programs
4,736,701
9,494
(7,093)
2,401
—
5,510
23,314
54,975
616
129,103
4,583
218,101
2,401
Total derivative contracts
$ 20,038,522
$ 301,052
$
(74,022) $ 227,030
$
(6,528) $
220,502
Liabilities
Notional¹
Gross
Fair
Value
Netting
Adjustments
Net Fair
Value
Before
Cash
Collateral
Cash
Collateral
Fair Value
Net of Cash
Collateral
Customer risk management programs:
Interest rate contracts
To-be-announced residential mortgage-
backed securities
Interest rate swaps
Energy contracts
Agricultural contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Equity option contracts
$ 11,537,742
$ 20,367
$
(18,096) $
2,271
$
(704) $
1,478,944
28,298
1,166,924
101,603
48,552
1,551
126,251
123,321
99,633
5,503
—
(47,873)
(960)
—
—
28,298
53,730
591
123,321
5,503
(12,896)
(42,767)
—
(53)
—
Total customer risk management programs
14,458,046
280,643
(66,929)
213,714
(56,420)
Internal risk management programs
5,728,421
21,762
(7,093)
14,669
—
1,567
15,402
10,963
591
123,268
5,503
157,294
14,669
Total derivative contracts
1 Notional amounts for commodity contracts are converted into dollar-equivalent amounts based on dollar prices at the inception of the
(74,022) $ 228,383
$ (56,420) $
$ 20,186,467
$ 302,405
$
171,963
contract.
107
The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative contracts recorded as “derivative contracts” assets and liabilities in
the balance sheet at December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Assets
Notional1
Gross
Fair
Value
Netting
Adjustments
Net Fair
Value
Before
Cash
Collateral
Cash
Collateral
Fair Value
Net of Cash
Collateral
$ 16,949,152
$ 180,695
$
(60,555) $ 120,140
$
— $
120,140
1,403,408
835,566
53,209
580,886
100,924
34,442
64,140
1,382
494,349
4,357
—
(28,298)
(515)
—
—
34,442
35,842
867
494,349
4,357
(4,567)
(71)
—
(5,183)
(730)
Customer risk management programs:
Interest rate contracts
To-be-announced residential mortgage-
backed securities
Interest rate swaps
Energy contracts
Agricultural contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Equity option contracts
Total customer risk management programs
19,923,145
779,365
(89,368)
689,997
(10,551)
Internal risk management programs
2,514,169
10,426
—
10,426
—
Total derivative contracts
$ 22,437,314
$ 789,791
$
(89,368) $ 700,423
$ (10,551) $
689,872
Liabilities
Notional¹
Gross
Fair
Value
Netting
Adjustments
Net Fair
Value
Before
Cash
Collateral
Cash
Collateral
Fair Value
Net of Cash
Collateral
$ 16,637,532
$ 176,928
$
(60,555) $ 116,373
$
— $
116,373
1,403,408
820,365
53,216
580,712
100,924
34,442
64,306
1,365
494,695
4,357
—
(28,298)
(515)
—
—
34,442
36,008
850
494,695
4,357
(11,977)
(31,534)
(769)
(3,630)
—
Customer risk management programs:
Interest rate contracts
To-be-announced residential mortgage-
backed securities
Interest rate swaps
Energy contracts
Agricultural contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Equity option contracts
Total customer risk management programs
19,596,157
776,093
(89,368)
686,725
(47,910)
Internal risk management programs
2,582,202
25,716
—
25,716
—
Total derivative contracts
1 Notional amounts for commodity contracts are converted into dollar-equivalent amounts based on dollar prices at the inception of the
(89,368) $ 712,441
$ (47,910) $
$ 22,178,359
$ 801,809
$
664,531
contract.
108
29,875
35,771
867
489,166
3,627
679,446
10,426
22,465
4,474
81
491,065
4,357
638,815
25,716
The following summarizes the pre-tax net gains (losses) on derivative instruments and where they are recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Earnings (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Brokerage
and
Trading
Revenue
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives,
Net
Brokerage
and
Trading
Revenue
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives,
Net
Brokerage
and
Trading
Revenue
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives,
Net
Customer risk management programs:
Interest rate contracts
To-be-announced residential mortgage-
backed securities
Interest rate swaps
Energy contracts
Agricultural contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Equity option contracts
Total customer risk management programs
Internal risk management programs
Total derivative contracts
$
48,761
$
$
34,532
$
— $
38,523
$
— $
33,877
$
2,647
5,536
79
1,352
—
44,146
4,615
—
—
—
—
—
—
779
779
2,589
5,027
111
945
—
47,195
(4,592)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(15,685)
2,066
4,060
123
797
—
40,923
(209)
$
42,603
$
(15,685) $
40,714
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
430
430
As discussed in Note 7, certain derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments related to mortgage loan
commitments and forward sales contracts are included in Residential mortgage loans held for sale on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. See Note 7 for additional discussion of notional, fair value and impact on earnings of these contracts.
No derivative contracts have been designated as hedging instruments for financial reporting purposes.
109
(4) Loans and Allowances for Credit Losses
The portfolio segments of the loan portfolio are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2017
Fixed
Rate
Variable
Rate
Non-
accrual
Total
Fixed
Rate
December 31, 2016
Variable
Rate
Non-
accrual
Total
Commercial
$ 2,217,432
$ 8,379,240
$ 137,303
$ 10,733,975
$ 2,327,085
$ 7,884,786
$ 178,953
$ 10,390,824
Commercial real
estate
548,692
2,928,440
Residential mortgage
1,608,655
154,517
317,584
810,990
2,855
47,447
269
3,479,987
624,187
3,179,338
1,973,686
1,647,357
965,776
154,971
256,255
684,697
5,521
46,220
290
3,809,046
1,949,832
839,958
Personal
Total
Accruing loans past
due (90 days)1
Foregone interest on
nonaccrual loans
$ 4,529,296
$ 12,436,254
$ 187,874
$ 17,153,424
$ 4,753,600
$ 12,005,076
$ 230,984
$ 16,989,660
$
633
$
16,496
$
5
$
15,990
1 Excludes residential mortgage loans guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. government.
At December 31, 2017, loans to businesses and individuals with collateral primarily located in Texas totaled $5.8 billion or
34% of the total loan portfolio. Loans to businesses and individuals with collateral primarily located in Oklahoma totaled $3.3
billion or 19% of our total loan portfolio. Loans for which the collateral location is not relevant, such as unsecured loans and
reserve-based energy loans, are distributed by the borrower’s primary operating location. These geographic concentrations
subject the loan portfolio to the general economic conditions within these areas. At December 31, 2016, loans to businesses and
individuals with collateral primarily located in Texas totaled $5.4 billion or 32% of the loan portfolio and loans to businesses
and individuals with collateral primarily located in Oklahoma totaled $3.5 billion or 21% of the loan portfolio.
Commercial
Commercial loans represent loans for working capital, facilities acquisition or expansion, purchases of equipment and other
needs of commercial customers primarily located within our geographical footprint. Commercial loans are underwritten
individually and represent on-going relationships based on a thorough knowledge of the customer, the customer’s industry and
market. While commercial loans are generally secured by the customer’s assets including real property, inventory, accounts
receivable, operating equipment, interest in mineral rights and other property and may also include personal guarantees of the
owners and related parties, the primary source of repayment of the loans is the on-going cash flow from operations of the
customer’s business. Inherent lending risk is centrally monitored on a continuous basis from underwriting throughout the life of
the loan for compliance with commercial lending policies.
At December 31, 2017, commercial loans with collateral primarily located in Texas totaled $3.6 billion or 34% of the
commercial loan portfolio segment and commercial loans with collateral primarily located in Oklahoma totaled $2.0 billion or
18% of the commercial loan portfolio segment. The commercial loan portfolio segment is further divided into loan classes. The
services loan class totaled $3.0 billion or 17% of total loans. Approximately $1.5 billion of loans in the services class consisted
of loans with individual balances of less than $10 million. Businesses included in the services class include governmental,
educational, commercial services, consumer services and utilities. The energy loan class totaled $2.9 billion or 17% of total
loans, including $2.5 billion of outstanding loans to energy producers. Approximately 57% of committed production loans were
secured by properties primarily producing oil and 43% are secured by properties producing natural gas. The healthcare loan
class totaled $2.3 billion or 13% of total loans. The healthcare loan class consists primarily of loans for the development and
operation of senior housing and care facilities, including independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing. Healthcare also
includes loans to hospitals and other medical service providers.
At December 31, 2016, commercial loans with collateral primarily located in Texas totaled $3.3 billion or 32% of the
commercial loan portfolio segment and commercial loans with collateral primarily located in Oklahoma totaled $2.1 billion or
21% of the commercial loan portfolio segment. The energy loan class totaled $2.5 billion or 15% of total loans, including $2.0
billion of outstanding loans to energy producers. At December 31, 2016, approximately 57% of committed production loans
were secured by properties primarily producing oil and 43% were secured by properties producing natural gas. The services
loan class totaled $3.1 billion or 18% of total loans. Approximately $1.4 billion of loans in the services category consisted of
loans with individual balances of less than $10 million. The healthcare loan class totaled $2.2 billion or 13% of total loans.
110
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial real estate loans are for the construction of buildings or other improvements to real estate and property held by
borrowers for investment purposes primarily within our geographical footprint. We require collateral values in excess of the
loan amounts, demonstrated cash flows in excess of expected debt service requirements, equity investment in the project and a
portion of the project already sold, leased or permanent financing already secured. The expected cash flows from all significant
new or renewed income producing property commitments are stress tested to reflect the risks in varying interest rates, vacancy
rates and rental rates. As with commercial loans, inherent lending risks are centrally monitored on a continuous basis from
underwriting throughout the life of the loan for compliance with applicable lending policies.
At December 31, 2017, 35% of commercial real estate loans are secured by properties primarily located in the Dallas and
Houston areas of Texas. An additional 12% of commercial real estate loans are secured by properties located primarily in the
Tulsa and Oklahoma City metropolitan areas of Oklahoma. At December 31, 2016, 30% of commercial real estate loans were
secured by properties in Texas, 11% of commercial real estate loans were secured by properties in Oklahoma.
Residential Mortgage and Personal
Residential mortgage loans provide funds for our customers to purchase or refinance their primary residence or to borrow
against the equity in their home. Residential mortgage loans are secured by a first or second mortgage on the customer’s
primary residence. Personal loans consist primarily of loans secured by the cash surrender value of insurance policies and
marketable securities. It also includes direct loans secured by and for the purchase of automobiles, recreational and marine
equipment as well as other unsecured loans. Residential mortgage and personal loans are made in accordance with underwriting
policies. Credit scoring is assessed based on significant credit characteristics including credit history, residential and
employment stability. Residential mortgage loans retained in the Company’s portfolio are primarily composed of various
mortgage programs to support customer relationships including jumbo mortgage loans, non-builder construction loans and
special loan programs for high net worth individuals and certain professionals. Jumbo loans may be fixed or variable rate and
are fully amortizing. Jumbo loans generally conform to government sponsored entity standards, except that the loan size
exceeds maximums required under these standards. These loans generally require a minimum FICO score of 720 and a
maximum debt-to-income ratio (“DTI”) of 38%. Loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios are tiered from 60% to 100%, depending on the
market. Special mortgage programs include fixed and variable fully amortizing loans tailored to the needs of certain healthcare
professionals. Variable rate loans are fully indexed at origination and may have fixed rates for three to ten years, then adjust
annually thereafter.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, residential mortgage loans included $198 million and $199 million, respectively, of loans
guaranteed by U.S. government agencies previously sold into GNMA mortgage pools. These loans either have been
repurchased or are eligible to be repurchased by the Company when certain defined delinquency criteria are met. Although
payments on these loans generally are past due more than 90 days, interest continues to accrue based on the government
guarantee.
Home equity loans totaled $733 million at December 31, 2017 and $744 million at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017,
64% of the home equity loan portfolio was comprised of first lien loans and 36% of the home equity portfolio was comprised
of junior lien loans. Junior lien loans were distributed 46% to amortizing term loans and 54% to revolving lines of credit. At
December 31, 2016, 65% of the home equity portfolio was comprised of first lien loans and 35% of the home equity loan
portfolio was comprised of junior lien loans. Junior lien loans were distributed 52% to amortizing term loans and 48% to
revolving lines of credit. Home equity loans generally require a minimum FICO score of 700 and a maximum DTI of 40%. The
maximum loan amount available for our home equity loan products is generally $400 thousand. Revolving loans have a 5 year
revolving period followed by 15 year term of amortizing repayments. Interest-only home equity loans may not be extended for
any additional revolving time. All other home equity loans may be extended at management's discretion for an additional 5 year
revolving term subject to an update of certain credit information.
At December 31, 2017, 31% of residential mortgage loans are secured by properties located in Oklahoma, 30% of residential
mortgage loans are secured by properties located in Texas and 11% of residential mortgage are secured by properties located in
Colorado. At December 31, 2016, 33% of residential mortgage loans were secured by properties in Oklahoma, 29% of
residential mortgage were secured by properties in Texas, 10% of residential mortgage loans are secured by properties in New
Mexico and 10% of residential mortgage loans are secured by properties in Colorado.
111
Credit Commitments
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of conditions established in
the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a
fee. At December 31, 2017, outstanding commitments totaled $10.0 billion. Because some commitments are expected to expire
before being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. BOK Financial
uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does loans.
The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based upon management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.
Because the credit risk involved in issuing standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan
commitments, BOK Financial uses the same credit policies in evaluating the creditworthiness of the customer. Additionally,
BOK Financial uses the same evaluation process in obtaining collateral on standby letters of credit as it does for loan
commitments. The term of these standby letters of credit is defined in each commitment and typically corresponds with the
underlying loan commitment. At December 31, 2017, outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $648 million. Commercial
letters of credit are used to facilitate customer trade transactions with the drafts being drawn when the underlying transaction is
consummated. At December 31, 2017, outstanding commercial letters of credit totaled $3.2 million.
Allowances for Credit Losses
BOK Financial maintains an allowance for loan losses and an accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk. The accrual for off-
balance sheet credit risk is maintained at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated losses associated with credit instruments
that are not currently recognized as assets such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit or guarantees. As discussed in
greater detail in Note 7, the Company also has separate accruals related to off-balance sheet credit risk related to residential
mortgage loans previously sold with full or partial recourse and for residential mortgage loans sold to government sponsored
agencies under standard representations and warranties.
The allowance for loan losses consists of specific allowances attributed to impaired loans that have not yet been charged down
to amounts we expect to recover, general allowances for unimpaired loans based on estimated loss rates by loan class and
nonspecific allowances based on general economic conditions, concentration in loans with large balances and other relevant
factors.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses and the accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk related to loan commitments and
standby letters of credit for the year ended December 31, 2017 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
Provision for loan losses
Loans charged off
Recoveries
Ending balance
Commercial
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Mortgage
Personal
Nonspecific
Allowance
Total
$
140,213
$
50,749
$
18,224
$
8,773
$
28,200
$
246,159
(595)
(19,810)
4,461
4,008
(76)
1,940
116
(649)
760
2,964
(5,064)
2,451
(5,983)
—
—
510
(25,599)
9,612
$
124,269
$
56,621
$
18,451
$
9,124
$
22,217
$
230,682
Accrual for off-balance sheet
credit risk:
Beginning balance
Provision for off-balance sheet credit
risk
Ending balance
Total provision for credit losses
$
$
$
11,063
(7,419)
3,644
(8,014)
$
$
$
123
$
50
$
8
$
— $
11,244
(78)
45
3,930
$
$
(7)
43
109
$
$
(6)
2
2,958
$
$
—
— $
(7,510)
3,734
(5,983) $
(7,000)
112
The activity in the allowance for loan losses and the accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk related to loan commitments and
standby letters of credit for the year ended December 31, 2016 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
Provision for loan losses
Loans charged off
Recoveries
Ending balance
Commercial
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Mortgage
Personal
Nonspecific
Allowance
Total
$
130,334
$
41,391
$
19,509
$
4,164
$
30,126
$
225,524
43,980
(35,828)
1,727
8,075
—
1,283
(1,972)
(1,312)
1,999
7,310
(5,448)
2,747
(1,926)
—
—
55,467
(42,588)
7,756
$
140,213
$
50,749
$
18,224
$
8,773
$
28,200
$
246,159
Accrual for off-balance sheet credit
risk:
Beginning balance
Provision for off-balance sheet credit
risk
Ending balance
Total provision for credit losses
$
$
$
1,506
$
153
$
30
$
22
$
— $
1,711
9,557
11,063
53,537
$
$
(30)
123
8,045
$
$
20
50
$
(14)
8
(1,952) $
7,296
—
— $
9,533
11,244
(1,926) $
65,000
$
$
The activity in the allowance for loan losses and the accrual for off-balance sheet credit risk related to loan commitments and
standby letters of credit for the year ended December 31, 2015 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance
Provision for loan losses
Loans charged off
Recoveries
Ending balance
Commercial
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Mortgage
Personal
Nonspecific
Allowance
Total
$
90,875
$
42,445
$
23,458
$
4,233
$
28,045
$
189,056
43,464
(6,734)
2,729
(11,189)
(944)
11,079
(3,004)
(2,205)
1,260
2,167
(5,288)
3,052
2,081
—
—
33,519
(15,171)
18,120
$
130,334
$
41,391
$
19,509
$
4,164
$
30,126
$
225,524
Accrual for off-balance sheet credit
risk:
Beginning balance
Provision for off-balance sheet credit
risk
Ending balance
Total provision for credit losses
$
$
$
475
$
707
$
28
$
20
$
— $
1,230
1,031
1,506
44,495
$
$
(554)
153
$
2
30
$
2
22
(11,743) $
(3,002) $
2,169
—
— $
481
1,711
2,081
$
34,000
$
$
113
The allowance for loan losses and recorded investment of the related loans by portfolio segment for each impairment
measurement method at December 31, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total
Collectively Measured
for Impairment
Individually Measured
for Impairment
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
$ 10,596,672
$
115,438
$
137,303
$
8,831
$ 10,733,975
$
124,269
3,477,132
1,926,239
965,507
56,621
18,451
9,124
2,855
47,447
269
—
—
—
3,479,987
1,973,686
965,776
56,621
18,451
9,124
16,965,550
199,634
187,874
8,831
17,153,424
208,465
Nonspecific allowance
—
—
—
—
—
22,217
Total
$ 16,965,550
$
199,634
$
187,874
$
8,831
$ 17,153,424
$
230,682
The allowance for loan losses and recorded investment of the related loans by portfolio segment for each impairment
measurement method at December 31, 2016 is as follows (in thousands):
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total
Collectively Measured
for Impairment
Individually Measured
for Impairment
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
$ 10,211,871
$
139,416
$
178,953
$
797
$ 10,390,824
$
140,213
3,803,525
1,903,612
839,668
50,749
18,178
8,773
5,521
46,220
290
—
46
—
3,809,046
1,949,832
839,958
50,749
18,224
8,773
16,758,676
217,116
230,984
843
16,989,660
217,959
Nonspecific allowance
—
—
—
—
—
28,200
Total
$ 16,758,676
$
217,116
$
230,984
$
843
$ 16,989,660
$
246,159
114
Credit Quality Indicators
The Company utilizes loan class and risk grading as primary credit quality indicators. Substantially all commercial and
commercial real estate loans and certain residential mortgage and personal loans are risk graded based on a quarterly evaluation
of the borrowers’ ability to repay the loans. Certain commercial loans and most residential mortgage and personal loans are
small, homogeneous pools that are not risk graded.
The allowance for loan losses and recorded investment of the related loans by portfolio segment for risk graded and non-risk
graded loans at December 31, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total
Internally Risk Graded
Non-Graded
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
$ 10,706,035
$
123,383
$
27,940
$
886
$ 10,733,975
$
124,269
3,479,987
234,477
877,390
56,621
2,947
6,461
—
1,739,209
88,386
15,297,889
189,412
1,855,535
—
15,504
2,663
19,053
3,479,987
1,973,686
965,776
56,621
18,451
9,124
17,153,424
208,465
Nonspecific allowance
—
—
—
—
—
22,217
Total
$ 15,297,889
$
189,412
$
1,855,535
$
19,053
$ 17,153,424
$
230,682
The allowance for loan losses and recorded investment of the related loans by portfolio segment for risk graded and non-risk
graded loans at December 31, 2016 is as follows (in thousands):
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total
Internally Risk Graded
Non-Graded
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
$ 10,360,725
$
139,293
$
30,099
$
920
$ 10,390,824
$
140,213
3,809,046
243,703
744,602
50,749
2,893
5,035
—
1,706,129
95,356
15,158,076
197,970
1,831,584
—
15,331
3,738
19,989
3,809,046
1,949,832
839,958
50,749
18,224
8,773
16,989,660
217,959
Nonspecific allowance
—
—
—
—
—
28,200
Total
$ 15,158,076
$
197,970
$
1,831,584
$
19,989
$ 16,989,660
$
246,159
Loans are considered to be performing if they are in compliance with the original terms of the agreement which is consistent
with the regulatory guideline of “pass.” Performing also includes loans considered to be “other loans especially mentioned” by
regulatory guidelines and all residential mortgage loans guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. government that continue to accrue
interest based on criteria of the guarantor's programs. Other loans especially mentioned are currently performing in compliance
with the original terms of the agreement but may have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention,
consistent with regulatory guidelines.
The risk grading process identified certain loans that have a well-defined weakness (e.g. inadequate debt service coverage or
liquidity or marginal capitalization; repayment may depend on collateral or other risk mitigation) that may jeopardize
liquidation of the debt and represent a greater risk due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. This is
consistent with the regulatory guideline for “substandard.” Because the borrowers are still performing in accordance with the
original terms of the loan agreements, these loans were not placed in nonaccruing status.
115
Nonaccruing loans represent loans for which full collection of principal and interest in accordance with the original terms of the
loan agreements is uncertain. This is substantially the same criteria used to determine whether a loan is impaired and includes
certain loans considered “substandard” and all loans considered “doubtful” by regulatory guidelines.
The following table summarizes the Company’s loan portfolio at December 31, 2017 by the risk grade categories (in
thousands):
Internally Risk Graded
Non-Graded
Performing
Other
Loans
Especially
Mentioned
Pass
Accruing
Substandard Nonaccrual
Performing Nonaccrual
Total
$ 2,632,986
$
60,288
$
144,598
$
92,284
$
— $
— $ 2,930,156
Commercial:
Energy
Services
Wholesale/retail
Manufacturing
Healthcare
Other commercial and
industrial
2,943,869
1,443,917
472,869
2,253,497
13,927
19,263
6,653
3,186
478,951
7
26,533
5,502
11,290
43,305
2,620
2,574
5,962
14,765
—
—
—
—
8,161
239,389
19,028
137,233
27,870
27,870
—
—
—
—
70
70
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,986,949
1,471,256
496,774
2,314,753
534,087
10,733,975
117,245
691,532
831,770
980,017
573,014
286,409
3,479,987
1,832
276
275
—
—
472
2,855
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,163
784,928
24,030
1,043,435
—
—
188,327
719,670
9,179
13,075
197,506
732,745
1,163
1,692,925
46,284
1,973,686
83
88,200
186
965,776
Total commercial
10,226,089
103,324
Commercial real estate:
Residential construction
and land development
Retail
Office
Multifamily
Industrial
Other commercial real
estate
Total commercial real
estate
113,190
686,915
824,408
979,969
573,014
285,506
1,828
4,243
7,087
—
—
145
3,463,002
13,303
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage
232,492
Permanent mortgages
guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Home equity
Total residential
mortgage
—
—
232,492
—
—
—
—
875,696
1,548
Personal
Total
395
98
—
48
—
286
827
822
—
—
822
63
$ 14,797,279
$
118,175
$
241,101
$
141,334
$ 1,808,995
$
46,540
$ 17,153,424
116
The following table summarizes the Company’s loan portfolio at December 31, 2016 by the risk grade categories (in thousands):
Internally Risk Graded
Non-Graded
Performing
Other
Loans
Especially
Mentioned
Pass
Accruing
Substandard Nonaccrual
Performing Nonaccrual
Total
$ 1,937,790
$
119,583
$
307,996
132,499
$
— $
— $
2,497,868
3,052,002
1,535,463
468,314
2,140,458
433,789
9,567,816
131,630
756,418
798,462
898,800
871,673
336,488
10,960
16,886
26,532
44,472
5,309
223,742
—
4,745
—
—
—
—
37,855
13,062
15,198
16,161
8,173
11,407
4,931
825
—
—
—
—
—
390,272
21,060
178,895
30,041
30,041
470
399
—
4,434
—
6
3,433
326
426
38
76
1,222
5,521
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,793,471
4,745
5,309
—
—
—
—
58
58
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,108,990
1,576,818
514,975
2,201,916
490,257
10,390,824
135,533
761,888
798,888
903,272
871,749
337,716
3,809,046
Commercial:
Energy
Services
Wholesale/retail
Manufacturing
Healthcare
Other commercial and
industrial
Total commercial
Commercial real estate:
Residential construction
and land development
Retail
Office
Multifamily
Industrial
Other commercial real
estate
Total commercial real
estate
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage
238,769
1,186
2,331
1,417
741,679
21,438
1,006,820
Permanent mortgages
guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Home equity
Total residential
mortgage
Personal
Total
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
187,541
732,106
11,846
11,519
199,387
743,625
238,769
1,186
2,331
1,417
1,661,326
44,803
1,949,832
743,451
—
1,054
97
95,163
193
839,958
$ 14,343,507
$
229,673
$
398,966
185,930
$ 1,786,530
$
45,054
$ 16,989,660
117
Commercial:
Energy
Services
Wholesale/retail
Manufacturing
Healthcare
Other commercial and industrial
Total commercial
Commercial real estate:
Residential construction and land
development
Retail
Office
Multifamily
Industrial
Other commercial real estate
Impaired Loans
Loans are considered to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according
to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. This includes all nonaccruing loans, all loans modified in a troubled debt
restructuring and all loans repurchased from GNMA pools.
A summary of impaired loans follows (in thousands):
As of December 31, 2017
Recorded Investment
Total
With No
Allowance
With
Allowance
Related
Allowance
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized
$
$
$
$ 92,284
2,620
2,574
5,962
14,765
19,098
137,303
40,968
2,620
2,574
5,962
14,765
19,080
85,969
51,316
—
—
—
—
18
51,334
$
8,814
—
—
—
—
17
8,831
$
112,392
5,396
6,990
5,446
7,795
20,108
158,127
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
$ 111,011
5,324
9,099
6,073
25,140
27,957
184,604
3,285
509
287
—
—
670
1,832
276
275
—
—
472
1,832
276
275
—
—
472
2,855
Total commercial real estate
4,751
2,855
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage
Permanent mortgage guaranteed by
U.S. government agencies1
Home equity
Total residential mortgage
30,435
25,193
25,193
203,814
14,548
248,797
197,506
13,075
235,774
197,506
13,075
235,774
Personal
307
269
269
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,633
301
351
19
38
847
4,189
24,024
199,244
12,297
235,565
280
—
Total
$
1 All permanent mortgage loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies are considered impaired as we do not expect full collection of
$ 438,459
$ 376,201
324,867
398,161
51,334
8,831
$
$
$
$
8,861
contractual principal and interest. At December 31, 2017, $9.2 million of these loans are nonaccruing and $188 million are accruing based
on the guarantee by U.S. government agencies.
Generally, no interest income is recognized on impaired loans until all principal balances, including amounts charged-off, have
been recovered. During 2017, we recognized $7.2 million as interest income on impaired loans that meet these conditions.
118
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,229
7,632
—
8,861
Commercial:
Energy
Services
Wholesale/retail
Manufacturing
Healthcare
Other commercial and
industrial
Total commercial
Commercial real estate:
Residential construction and
land development
Retail
Office
Multifamily
Industrial
Other commercial real estate
Total commercial real
estate
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage
Permanent mortgage
guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies1
Home equity
Total residential mortgage
As of December 31, 2016
Recorded Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Total
With No
Allowance
With
Allowance
Related
Allowance
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized
$
146,897
$
132,499
$
121,418
$
11,081
$
762
$
80,100
$
11,723
17,669
5,320
1,147
8,173
11,407
4,931
825
8,173
11,407
4,931
825
29,006
211,762
21,118
178,953
21,083
167,837
—
—
—
—
35
11,116
4,951
530
521
1,000
76
7,349
14,427
3,433
3,433
326
426
38
76
1,222
5,521
326
426
38
76
1,222
5,521
28,830
22,855
22,809
205,564
12,611
247,005
199,387
11,519
233,761
199,387
11,519
233,715
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
46
—
—
46
—
9,232
7,163
2,631
949
10,870
110,945
3,921
823
539
156
76
1,747
7,262
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
25,920
1,255
193,889
10,937
230,746
7,759
—
9,014
377
—
—
—
—
—
35
797
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
46
—
—
46
—
Personal
332
290
290
Total
1 All permanent mortgage loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies are considered impaired as we do not expect full collection of
418,525
349,330
407,363
473,526
11,162
843
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
9,014
contractual principal and interest. At December 31, 2016, $12 million of these loans are nonaccruing and $188 million are accruing based
on the guarantee by U.S. government agencies.
119
Troubled Debt Restructurings
At December 31, 2017 the Company has $126 million in troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), of which $74 million are
accruing residential mortgage loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Approximately $48 million of TDRs are
performing in accordance with the modified terms. The loans designated as TDRs had $117 thousand in charge offs during the
year ended December 31, 2017.
At December 31, 2016, TDRs totaled $147 million, of which $81 million were accruing residential mortgage loans guaranteed
by U.S. government agencies. Approximately $75 million of TDRs were performing. The loans designated as TDRs had $4.7
million in charge offs during the year ended December 31, 2016.
TDRs generally consist of interest rate concessions, payment stream concessions or a combination of concessions to distressed
borrowers. During the year ended December 31, 2017, $57 million of loans were restructured. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, $52 million of loans were restructured.
120
Nonaccrual & Past Due Loans
Past due status for all loan classes is based on the actual number of days since the last payment was due according to the
contractual terms of the loans.
A summary of loans currently performing, loans past due and accruing and nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2017 is as follows
(in thousands):
Current
30 to 59
Days
Past Due
60 to 89
Days
90 Days
or More
Nonaccrual
Total
Commercial:
Energy
Services
Wholesale/retail
Manufacturing
Healthcare
Other commercial and industrial
Total commercial
Commercial real estate:
Residential construction and land
development
Retail
Office
Multifamily
Industrial
Other commercial real estate
$ 2,833,668
$
2,983,222
1,468,284
490,739
2,284,770
514,701
10,575,384
—
514
398
—
15,218
85
16,215
115,213
691,256
831,118
979,625
573,014
285,937
200
—
254
22
—
—
476
4,204
$
— $
92,284
$ 2,930,156
486
—
73
—
78
4,841
—
—
—
370
—
—
370
107
—
—
—
125
232
—
—
123
—
—
—
123
2,620
2,574
5,962
14,765
19,098
2,986,949
1,471,256
496,774
2,314,753
534,087
137,303
10,733,975
1,832
276
275
—
—
472
2,855
117,245
691,532
831,770
980,017
573,014
286,409
3,479,987
Total commercial real estate
3,476,163
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage
Permanent mortgages guaranteed by
U.S. government agencies
Home equity
Total residential mortgage
Personal
Total
1,014,588
3,435
219
—
25,193
1,043,435
22,692
717,007
1,754,287
18,978
2,206
24,619
13,468
440
14,127
133,189
17
133,206
9,179
13,075
47,447
197,506
732,745
1,973,686
964,374
681
191
261
269
965,776
$ 16,770,208
$
41,991
19,529
$
133,822
$
187,874
$ 17,153,424
121
A summary of loans currently performing, loans past due and accruing and nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2016 is as
follows (in thousands):
Current
30 to 59
Days
Past Due
60 to 89
Days
90 Days
or More
Nonaccrual
Total
— $
— $
132,499
$ 2,497,868
Commercial:
Energy
Services
Wholesale/retail
Manufacturing
Healthcare
Other commercial and industrial
$ 2,364,890
$
3,099,605
1,561,650
509,662
2,201,050
468,981
479
191
3,761
382
—
155
1,021
—
—
41
3
Total commercial
10,205,838
4,968
1,065
Commercial real estate:
Residential construction and land
development
Retail
Office
Multifamily
Industrial
Other commercial real estate
132,100
761,562
798,462
903,234
871,673
336,488
Total commercial real estate
3,803,519
—
—
—
—
—
6
6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Residential mortgage:
Permanent mortgage
Permanent mortgages guaranteed by
U.S. government agencies
Home equity
Total residential mortgage
Personal
Total
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8,173
11,407
4,931
825
21,118
3,108,990
1,576,818
514,975
2,201,916
490,257
178,953
10,390,824
3,433
326
426
38
76
1,222
5,521
135,533
761,888
798,888
903,272
871,749
337,716
3,809,046
22,855
1,006,820
11,846
11,519
46,220
199,387
743,625
1,949,832
979,386
3,299
1,280
40,594
729,493
1,749,473
17,465
2,276
23,040
13,803
337
15,420
115,679
—
115,679
838,811
589
263
5
290
839,958
$ 16,597,641
$
28,603
16,748
$
115,684
$
230,984
$ 16,989,660
122
(5) Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment at December 31 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Land
Buildings and improvements
Software
Furniture and equipment
Construction in progress
Premises and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
December 31,
2017
2016
$
71,348
$
249,139
188,826
223,163
23,348
755,824
438,489
317,335
$
$
70,552
250,311
158,155
217,399
36,743
733,160
407,311
325,849
Depreciation expense of premises and equipment was $48 million, $40 million and $34 million for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(6) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
On December 1, 2016, the Company acquired MBT Bancshares (“MBT”), parent company of Missouri Bank and Trust of
Kansas City (“Mobank”) following regulatory approval of the transaction. Mobank operated four banking branches in the
Kansas City, Mo. area. BOK Financial paid $102.5 million in an all-cash deal for all outstanding shares of MBT stock. MBT
was merged into BOK Financial and Mobank became a wholly owned subsidiary of BOK Financial on December 1, 2016. On
February 21, 2017, Mobank was merged with the Bank of Kansas City division of BOKF, NA. All branches in the Kansas City
market operate under the Mobank name. The preliminary purchase price allocation was finalized during 2017, resulting in a
$2.0 million increase in identifiable intangibles, $1.5 million decrease in premises and equipment and other repossessed assets,
and a $526 thousand decrease in goodwill.
The following table presents the original cost and accumulated amortization of intangible assets (in thousands):
Core deposit premiums
Less accumulated amortization
Net core deposit premiums
Other identifiable intangible assets
Less accumulated amortization
Net other identifiable intangible assets
Dec. 31,
2017
2016
$
6,510
$
808
5,702
44,468
21,512
22,956
35,879
29,369
6,510
60,951
20,530
40,421
Total intangible assets, net
$
28,658
$
46,931
123
Expected amortization expense for intangible assets that will continue to be amortized (in thousands):
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Core
Deposit
Premiums
Other
Identifiable
Intangible
Assets
$
732
716
697
675
649
2,233
$
4,322
$
3,970
3,834
3,477
2,628
4,725
Total
5,054
4,686
4,531
4,152
3,277
6,958
$
5,702
$
22,956
$
28,658
The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by operating segment are as follows (in thousands):
Balance, December 31, 2015
Goodwill
Accumulated impairment losses
Goodwill recognized during 2016
Adjustment2
Balance, December 31, 2016
Goodwill
Accumulated impairment losses
Goodwill recognized during 2017
Sales of consolidated merchant banking investments
during 2017
Adjustment1
Balance, December 31, 2017
Goodwill
Accumulated impairment losses
Commercial
Banking
Consumer
Banking
Wealth
Management
Funds
Management
and Other
Total
$
277,044
$
39,251
$
69,394
$
— $
385,689
—
277,044
1,210
$
(6,058) $
(228)
39,023
—
69,394
—
—
(228)
385,461
—
— $
2,126
— $
66,160
—
69,496
(6,058)
272,196
—
272,196
4,301
(5,219)
41,992
39,251
(228)
39,023
—
—
71,520
—
71,520
—
(25)
66,160
449,127
—
(228)
66,160
448,899
—
—
4,301
(5,244)
(526)
4,435
19,207
(66,160)
313,270
—
43,686
(228)
90,702
—
—
—
447,658
(228)
447,430
313,270
1 Goodwill from Mobank acquisition was not yet allocated to the segments as of December 31, 2016. Adjustment was made in 2017 for final
43,458
90,702
— $
$
$
$
$
purchase price adjustments and to allocate to the segments.
2 Completion of an external audit of Heartland Food Products resulted in a reallocation of the purchase price between net assets acquired,
intangible assets and goodwill during 2016.
The annual goodwill evaluations for 2017 and 2016 did not indicate impairment for any reporting unit. Economic conditions
did not indicate that impairment existed for any identifiable intangible assets and therefore no impairment evaluation was
performed.
124
(7) Mortgage Banking Activities
Residential Mortgage Loan Production
The Company originates, markets and services conventional and government-sponsored residential mortgage loans. Generally,
conforming fixed rate residential mortgage loans are held for sale in the secondary market and non-conforming and adjustable-
rate residential mortgage loans are held for investment. The volume of mortgage loans originated for sale and secondary market
prices are the primary drivers of originating and marketing revenue.
Residential mortgage loan commitments are generally outstanding for 60 to 90 days, which represents the typical period from
commitment to originate a residential mortgage loan to when the closed loan is sold to an investor. Residential mortgage loan
commitments are subject to both credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk is managed through underwriting policies and
procedures, including collateral requirements, which are generally accepted by the secondary loan markets. Exposure to interest
rate fluctuations is partially managed through forward sales of residential mortgage-backed securities and forward sales
contracts. These latter contracts set the price for loans that will be delivered in the next 60 to 90 days.
The unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans held for sale, notional amounts of derivative contracts related to
residential mortgage loan commitments and forward contract sales and their related fair values included in Mortgage loans held
for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were (in thousands):
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Residential mortgage loan commitments
Forward sales contracts
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Unpaid
Principal
Balance/
Notional
Fair Value
Unpaid
Principal
Balance/
Notional
Fair Value
$
212,525
$
215,113
$
286,414
$
286,971
222,919
380,159
6,523
(258)
318,359
569,543
9,733
5,193
$
221,378
$
301,897
No residential mortgage loans held for sale were 90 days or more past due or considered impaired as of December 31, 2017 or
December 31, 2016. No credit losses were recognized on residential mortgage loans held for sale for the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
Mortgage banking revenue was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
2017
2016
2015
Production revenue:
Net realized gains on sales of mortgage loans
$
45,128
$
68,947
$
Net change in unrealized gain on mortgage loans held for sale
Net change in the fair value of mortgage loan commitments
Net change in the fair value of forward sales contracts
Total mortgage production revenue
Servicing revenue
Total mortgage banking revenue
2,031
(3,210)
(5,451)
38,498
66,221
(5,311)
1,599
4,393
69,628
64,286
67,407
(784)
(1,837)
4,801
69,587
56,415
$
104,719
$
133,914
$
126,002
Mortgage production revenue includes gain (loss) on residential mortgage loans held for sale and changes in the fair value of
derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments related to residential mortgage loan commitments and forward sales
contracts. Servicing revenue includes servicing fee income and late charges on loans serviced for others.
125
Residential Mortgage Servicing
The Company generally retains the right to service residential mortgage loans sold and may purchase mortgage servicing
rights. The unpaid principal balance of loans serviced for others is the primary driver of servicing revenue.
The following represents a summary of mortgage servicing rights (Dollars in thousands):
Number of residential mortgage loans serviced for others
2017
136,528
December 31,
2016
139,340
2015
131,859
Outstanding principal balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for others
$
22,046,632
$
21,997,568
$
19,678,226
Weighted average interest rate
Remaining contractual term (in months)
3.94%
297
3.97%
301
4.12%
300
Activity in capitalized mortgage servicing rights during the three years ended December 31, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):
Balance, December 31, 2014
Additions, net
Change in fair value due to loan runoff
Change in fair value due to market changes
Balance, December 31, 2015
Additions, net
Change in fair value due to loan runoff
Change in fair value due to market changes
Balance, December 31, 2016
Additions, net
Change in fair value due to loan runoff
Change in fair value due to market changes
Balance, December 31, 2017
$
171,976
79,546
(28,064)
(4,853)
218,605
71,405
(40,744)
(2,193)
247,073
39,149
(33,527)
172
$
252,867
Changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights due to market changes are included in Other operating revenue in the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Changes in fair value due to loan runoff are included in Mortgage banking costs.
Mortgage servicing rights are not traded in active markets. Fair value is determined by discounting the projected net cash flows.
Significant assumptions used to determine fair value considered to be significant unobservable inputs were as follows:
Discount rate – risk-free rate plus a market premium
December 31,
2017
9.84%
2016
10.08%
Prepayment rate - based upon loan interest rate, original term and loan type
8.72%-15.16%
8.98%-16.91%
Loan servicing costs – annually per loan based upon loan type:
Performing loans
Delinquent loans
Loans in foreclosure
Primary/secondary mortgage rate spread
Escrow earnings rate – indexed to rates paid on deposit accounts with comparable average
life
$65 - $88
$150 - $500
$63 - $120
$150 - $500
$1,000 - $4,000
$650 - $4,250
105 bps
2.24%
105 bps
1.98%
Changes in primary residential mortgage interest rates directly affect the prepayment speeds used in valuing our mortgage servicing
rights. A separate third party model is used to estimate prepayment speeds based on interest rates, housing turnover rates, estimated
loan curtailment, anticipated defaults and other relevant factors. The prepayment model is updated periodically for changes in
market conditions and adjusted to better correlate with actual performance of BOK Financial’s servicing portfolio.
126
The aging status of our mortgage loans serviced for others by investor at December 31, 2017 follows (in thousands):
Current
30 to 59
Days
Past Due
60 to 89
Days
90 Days or
More
Total
$ 7,995,369
$
81,805
$
14,091
$
32,756
$
8,124,021
6,595,410
6,431,808
452,227
81,405
232,937
4,271
13,856
60,556
1,128
27,083
19,743
2,187
6,717,754
6,745,044
459,813
$ 21,474,814
$
400,418
$
89,631
$
81,769
$ 22,046,632
FHLMC
FNMA
GNMA
Other
Total
(8) Deposits
Interest expense on deposits is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Transaction deposits
Savings
Time:
Certificates of deposits under $100,000
Certificates of deposits $100,000 and over
Other time deposits
Total time
Total
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
28,627
$
13,906
$
8,821
359
386
383
7,702
12,393
4,722
24,817
8,776
10,123
7,303
26,202
11,894
10,643
12,429
34,966
$
53,803
$
40,494
$
44,170
The aggregate amounts of time deposits in denominations of $250,000 or more at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $797
million and $866 million, respectively.
Time deposit maturities are as follows: 2018 – $1.2 billion, 2019 – $221 million, 2020 – $86 million, 2021 – $102 million,
2022 – $132 million and $307 million thereafter.
The aggregate amount of overdrawn customer transaction deposits that have been reclassified as loan balances was $5.9 million
at December 31, 2017 and $9.7 million at December 31, 2016.
127
(9) Other Borrowings
Information relating to other borrowings is summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
As of
December 31, 2017
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
Balance
Rate
Average
Balance
Rate
Maximum
Outstanding
At Any
Month End
Parent company and other non-bank subsidiaries:
Trust preferred debt
Other
Total other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total parent company and other non-bank subsidiaries
BOKF, NA:
Funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Other borrowings:
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
GNMA repurchase liability
Other
Total other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total BOKF, NA
$
—
—
—
—% $
3,296
3.52% $
—%
935
11.11%
144,677
144,677
5.60%
4,231
7.00%
144,658
148,889
5.62% $
5.65%
58,628
516,335
1.00%
0.17%
58,064
433,791
0.73%
0.10%
5,100,000
1.47% 5,882,466
19,947
14,950
4.22%
2.61%
5,134,897
20,509
15,382
5,918,357
—
—%
—
1.13%
4.59%
2.38%
1.14%
—%
5,709,860
6,410,212
1.07%
7,217
3,104
144,677
80,967
536,094
6,200,000
24,139
15,506
—
Total other borrowed funds
$
5,854,537
$ 6,559,101
1.18%
128
As of
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2016
Balance
Rate
Average
Balance
Rate
Maximum
Outstanding
At Any
Month End
Parent company and other non-bank subsidiaries:
Trust preferred debt
Other
Total other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total parent company and other non-bank subsidiaries
$
7,217
1,092
8,309
144,640
152,949
3.28% $
611
3.27% $
8.27%
5.60%
2,073
2,684
74,428
77,112
16.11%
13.19%
5.59%
5.86%
BOKF, NA:
Funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Other borrowings:
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
GNMA repurchase liability
Other
Total other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total BOKF, NA
57,929
668,661
0.38%
0.02%
78,222
589,145
0.24%
0.04%
4,800,000
0.72% 5,985,656
22,471
15,292
4.26%
2.66%
4,837,763
15,637
15,670
6,016,963
—
—%
140,414
5,564,353
6,824,744
0.55%
4.74%
2.41%
0.57%
1.35%
0.54%
Total other borrowed funds
$
5,717,302
$ 6,901,856
0.60%
7,217
3,157
145,393
567,103
668,661
6,500,000
22,471
15,797
226,434
As of
Year Ended
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2015
Balance
Rate
Average
Balance
Rate
Maximum
Outstanding
At Any
Month End
Parent company and other non-bank subsidiaries:
Trust preferred debt
Other
Total other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total parent company and other non-bank subsidiaries
$
—% $
—%
—%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—% $
—%
—%
—%
—%
BOKF, NA:
Funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Other borrowings:
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
GNMA repurchase liability
Other
Total other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total BOKF, NA
491,192
722,444
0.15%
0.02%
73,219
623,921
0.09%
0.04%
4,800,000
0.48% 4,921,739
19,478
18,402
4.75%
2.70%
4,837,880
16,668
18,768
4,957,175
226,350
1.05%
226,332
6,277,866
5,880,647
0.28%
4.95%
2.35%
0.33%
1.84%
0.36%
Total other borrowed funds
$
6,277,866
$ 5,880,647
0.36%
129
—
—
—
491,192
1,008,144
5,000,000
19,478
26,058
348,076
Aggregate annual principal repayments at December 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total
Parent
Company
and Other
Non-bank
Subsidiaries
BOKF, NA
$
— $
5,695,621
—
—
—
—
956
961
965
970
144,677
10,387
$
144,677
$
5,709,860
Funds purchased are unsecured and generally mature within one to ninety days from the transaction date. Securities repurchase
agreements are recorded as secured borrowings that generally mature within ninety days and are secured by certain available
for sale securities.
Additional information relating to securities sold under agreements to repurchase and related liabilities at December 31, 2017
and 2016 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Security Sold/Maturity
U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities:
Overnight1
Long-term
Total Agency Securities
Security Sold/Maturity
U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities:
Overnight1
Long-term
Total Agency Securities
December 31, 2017
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Repurchase
Liability1
Average
Rate
525,452
—
525,452
$
$
523,914
—
523,914
$
$
516,335
—
516,335
0.17%
—%
0.17%
December 31, 2016
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Repurchase
Liability1
Average
Rate
655,529
—
655,529
$
$
655,851
—
655,851
$
$
668,661
—
668,661
0.02 %
— %
0.02 %
$
$
$
$
1 BOK Financial maintains control over the securities underlying overnight repurchase agreements and generally transfers control over securities underlying
longer-term dealer repurchase agreements to the respective counterparty.
Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Banks are used for funding purposes. In accordance with policies of the Federal
Home Loan Banks, BOK Financial has granted a blanket pledge of eligible assets (generally unencumbered U.S. Treasury and
residential mortgage-backed securities, 1-4 family loans and multifamily loans) as collateral for these advances. The Federal
Home Loan Banks have issued letters of credit totaling $272 million to secure BOK Financial’s obligations to depositors of
public funds. The unused credit available to BOK Financial at December 31, 2017 pursuant to the Federal Home Loan Bank’s
collateral policies is $1.2 billion.
In 2016, BOK Financial issued $150 million of subordinated debt that will mature on June 30, 2056. Interest on this debt bears
an interest rate of 5.375%, payable quarterly. On June 30, 2021, BOK Financial will have the option to redeem the debt at the
principal amount plus accrued interest, subject to regulatory approval.
In conjunction with the acquisition of MBT, BOK Financial assumed $7.2 million of variable rate subordinated trust preferred
debt. Interest was payable quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 2.95% on $3.1 million and three-month LIBOR plus 1.82% on
$4.1 million. This trust preferred debt was redeemed during 2017.
130
BOK Financial Securities, Inc. may borrow funds from Pershing, LLC ("Pershing"), a clearing broker/dealer and a wholly
owned subsidiary of Bank of New York Mellon, for the purposes of financing securities purchases or to facilitate funding of
investment banking activities, on terms to be negotiated at the time of the borrowing. BOK Financial Securities, Inc. had no
borrowings from Pershing outstanding at December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
In 2007, BOKF, NA issued $250 million of subordinated debt due May 15, 2017. Interest on this debt was based upon a fixed
rate of 5.75% through May 14, 2012 and is based on a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.69% thereafter. The proceeds
of this debt were used to fund the Worth National Bank and First United Bank acquisitions and to fund continued asset growth.
The outstanding balance of this subordinated debt was $226 million at December 31, 2015. The remaining outstanding balance
was called during 2016.
The Company has a liability related to the repurchase of certain delinquent residential mortgage loans previously sold into
GNMA mortgage pools. Interest is payable at rates contractually due to investors.
(10) Federal and State Income Taxes
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act"), which was enacted on December 22, 2017, reduces the federal corporate tax rate from
35% to 21% for periods beginning January 1, 2018. Provisions of the Act are broad and complex. As result, we are still
evaluating the impact that certain aspects of the Act will have on the Company's financial position and results of operations,
including recognition and measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities and the determination of effective current and
deferred federal and state income tax rates. We have made reasonable estimates of the Act's impact on net deferred tax assets
and recorded a provisional adjustment of $9.5 million, including $6.4 million of net deferred tax assets resulting from
temporary differences recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income on the Company's balance sheets. Additionally,
we recognized a provisional adjustment of $2.2 million for deferred taxes resulting from executive compensation that may no
longer be deductible.
We are not aware of any material areas where we were not able to determine provisional amounts. However, accounting for
income tax effects of the Act is still in process and provisional adjustments recognized in 2017 may be adjusted as a result of
our on-going evaluation, including subsequent guidance provided by federal and state taxing authorities and other information
as it becomes available.
131
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. As a result of the Act, deferred tax balances at
December 31, 2017 generally have been revalued from the previous combined federal and state statutory rate of 38.9% to
25.5%. Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
Deferred tax assets:
Available for sale securities mark to market
Share-based compensation
Credit loss allowances
Valuation adjustments
Deferred compensation
Unearned fees
Other
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation
Mortgage servicing rights
Lease financing
Other
Total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax assets
December 31,
2017
2016
$
12,083
$
7,598
58,666
8,102
12,215
9,265
30,859
5,779
9,360
99,191
12,222
30,262
11,877
42,541
138,788
211,232
15,817
63,112
9,973
34,880
123,782
$
15,006
$
25,877
92,748
17,923
45,363
181,911
29,321
No valuation allowance was necessary on deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
The significant components of the provision for income taxes attributable to continuing operations for BOK Financial are
shown below (in thousands):
Current income tax expense:
Federal
State
Total current income tax expense
Deferred income tax expense:
Federal
State
Total deferred income tax expense
Total income tax expense
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
141,607
$
107,379
$
117,566
14,592
156,199
11,028
118,407
12,397
129,963
25,525
869
26,394
(11,340)
(690)
(12,030)
8,397
1,024
9,421
$
182,593
$
106,377
$
139,384
132
The reconciliations of income attributable to continuing operations at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to income tax expense
are as follows (in thousands):
Amount:
Federal statutory tax
Tax exempt revenue
Effect of state income taxes, net of federal benefit
Utilization of tax credits:
Low-income housing tax credits, net of amortization
Other tax credits
Bank-owned life insurance
Share-based compensation
Revaluation of net deferred tax assets due to change in federal tax rates
Write-off of deferred tax assets related to executive compensation
Other, net
Total income tax expense
Percent of pretax income:
Federal statutory tax
Tax exempt revenue
Effect of state income taxes, net of federal benefit
Utilization of tax credits:
Low-income housing tax credits, net of amortization
Other tax credits
Bank-owned life insurance
Share-based compensation
Revaluation of net deferred tax assets due to change in federal tax rates
Write-off of deferred tax assets related to executive compensation
Other, net
Total
(9,553)
9,082
(3,874)
(2,085)
(3,264)
—
—
—
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
181,397
$
118,530
$
151,075
(12,402)
10,701
(10,544)
6,478
(5,356)
(1,455)
(3,121)
(2,817)
9,456
2,216
3,974
(4,171)
(2,085)
(2,911)
—
—
—
1,080
(1,997)
$
182,593
$
106,377
$
139,384
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
35.0%
(2.4)
2.0
(1.0)
(0.3)
(0.6)
(0.5)
1.8
0.4
0.8
35.0%
(3.1)
1.9
(1.2)
(0.6)
(0.9)
—
—
—
0.3
35.2%
31.4%
35.0%
(2.2)
2.1
(0.9)
(0.5)
(0.7)
—
—
—
(0.5)
32.3%
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of January 1
Additions for tax for current year positions
Settlements during the period
Lapses of applicable statute of limitations
Balance as of December 31
2017
2016
2015
$
15,841
$
13,232
$
4,645
—
(2,376)
5,640
—
(3,031)
$
18,110
$
15,841
$
13,374
2,226
—
(2,368)
13,232
Of the above unrecognized tax benefits, $12.2 million, if recognized, would have affected the effective tax rate.
BOK Financial recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The
Company recognized $1.2 million for 2017, $1.0 million for 2016 and $1.0 million for 2015 in interest and penalties. The
Company had approximately $4.0 million and $3.5 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at December 31,
2017 and 2016, respectively. Federal statutes remain open for federal tax returns filed in the previous three reporting periods.
Various state income tax statutes remain open for the previous three to six reporting periods.
133
(11) Employee Benefits
BOK Financial sponsors a defined benefit cash balance Pension Plan for all employees who satisfy certain age and service
requirements. Pension Plan benefits were curtailed as of April 1, 2006. No participants may be added to the plan and no
additional service benefits will be accrued. During 2017 and 2016, interest accrued on employees' account balances at a
variable rate tied to the five-year trailing average of five-year U.S. Treasury securities plus 1.5%. The rate has a floor of 3.0%
and a ceiling of 5.0%. The 2017 quarterly variable rates remained at 3.00%.
The following table presents information regarding this plan (in thousands):
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
Interest cost
Actuarial loss (gain)
Benefits paid
Projected benefit obligation at end of year1,2
Change in plan assets:
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Benefits paid
Plan assets at fair value at end of year
Funded status of the plan
Components of net periodic benefit:
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Other
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)
1 Projected benefit obligation equals accumulated benefit obligation.
2 Projected benefit obligation is based on January 1 measurement date.
Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31:
Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
December 31,
2017
2016
$
34,964
$
1,153
223
(5,443)
30,897
41,769
4,093
(5,443)
40,419
9,522
1,153
(2,041)
184
$
$
$
$
$
(704) $
$
$
$
$
$
$
38,797
1,309
(55)
(5,087)
34,964
44,190
2,666
(5,087)
41,769
6,805
1,309
(2,167)
(741)
(1,599)
2017
2016
3.30%
5.50%
3.43%
5.00%
As of December 31, 2017, expected future benefit payments related to the Pension Plan were as follows (in thousands):
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total estimated future benefit payments
$
$
2,831
2,889
2,763
2,769
2,813
25,501
39,566
134
Assets of the Pension Plan consist primarily of shares in the Cavanal Hill Active Core Fund. The stated objective of this fund is
to provide an attractive total return with a well-balanced mix of equities and bonds. The typical portfolio mix is approximately
60% equities and 40% bonds. The net asset value of shares in the Cavanal Hill Funds is reported daily based on market
quotations for the Fund’s securities. Management considers the Fund's recent and long-term performance as indicators when
setting the expected return on plan assets. The maximum tax deductible Pension Plan contribution for 2017 was $10 million.
No minimum contribution was required for 2017, 2016 or 2015.
Employee contributions to the Thrift Plan are eligible for Company matching equal to 6% of base compensation, as defined in
the plan. The Company-provided matching contribution rates range from 50% for employees with less than 4 years of service
to 200% for employees with 15 or more years of service. Additionally, a maximum Company-provided, non-elective annual
contribution of up to $750 per participant is provided for employees whose annual base compensation is less than $40,000.
Participants may direct investments in their accounts to a variety of options, including a BOK Financial common stock fund
and Cavanal Hill funds. Employer contributions, which are invested in accordance with the participant’s investment options,
vest over five years. Thrift Plan expenses were $22.8 million for 2017, $22.4 million for 2016 and $20.6 million for 2015.
135
(12) Share-Based Compensation Plans
The shareholders and Board of Directors of BOK Financial have approved various share-based compensation plans. An
independent compensation committee of the Board of Directors determines the number of awards granted to the Chief
Executive Officer and other senior executives. Share-based compensation is granted to other officers and employees as
determined by the Chief Executive Officer.
The following table presents stock options outstanding during 2017, 2016 and 2015 under these plans (in thousands, except for
per share data):
Options outstanding at December 31, 2014
Options awarded
Options exercised
Options forfeited
Options expired
Options outstanding at December 31, 2015
Options awarded
Options exercised
Options forfeited
Options expired
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016
Options awarded
Options exercised
Options forfeited
Options expired
Options outstanding at December 31, 2017
Options vested at:
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2017
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Number
793,891
$
49.05
$
8,725
—
(286,678)
(22,304)
(4,874)
480,035
—
(249,404)
(4,098)
(8,009)
218,524
—
(99,556)
(624)
(793)
117,551
243,395
93,117
51,286
$
$
—
47.86
48.90
51.32
49.75
—
47.60
55.44
53.43
51.95
—
50.35
54.95
48.75
53.26
48.17
46.22
48.62
$
$
4,821
6,793
4,592
2,829
3,429
2,241
At December 31, 2017, the weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding was 2.54 years and the weighted
average remaining contractual life of vested options was 1.16 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $3.5
million for 2017, $6.2 million for 2016 and $5.1 million for 2015.
136
The following represents a summary of the non-vested stock awards as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
Non-vested at January 1, 2015
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Non-vested at December 31, 2015
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Non-vested at December 31, 2016
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Non-vested at December 31, 2017
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
$57.66
$50.15
$58.33
$55.35
$55.87
$57.86
$86.95
$63.07
$78.70
Shares
688,611
312,755
(114,045)
(96,212)
791,109
256,670
(213,941)
(47,132)
786,706
177,807
(194,419)
(102,991)
667,103
Compensation expense recognized on non-vested shares totaled $23.2 million for 2017, $10.2 million for 2016 and $12.0
million for 2015. Unrecognized compensation cost of non-vested shares totaled $15.8 million at December 31, 2017. We expect
to recognize compensation expense of $9.9 million in 2018, $5.9 million in 2019, and $82 thousand in 2020.
Compensation cost for 296,518 non-vested shares is variable based on the current fair value of BOK Financial common shares.
All non-vested shares are subject to forfeiture for failure to meet service requirements and 297,567 non-vested shares may be
increased or decreased based on performance criteria defined in the plan documents.
During January 2018, BOK Financial awarded 150,419 shares of non-vested stock with a fair value per award of $94.77. The
aggregate compensation cost of these awards totaled approximately $14.3 million.
137
(13) Related Parties
In compliance with applicable banking regulations, the Company may extend credit to certain executive officers, directors,
principal shareholders and their affiliates (collectively referred to as “related parties”) in the ordinary course of business. The
Company’s loans to related parties do not involve more than the normal credit risk and there are no nonaccruing or impaired
related party loans outstanding at December 31, 2017 or 2016.
Activity in loans to related parties is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Beginning balance
Advances
Payments
Adjustments1
Ending balance
1 Adjustments generally consist of changes in status as a related party.
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
136,945
$
1,559,291
594,225
884,511
(1,585,865)
(1,123,747)
(125)
(218,044)
$
110,246
$
136,945
As defined by banking regulations, loan commitments and equity investments to a single affiliate may not exceed 10% of
unimpaired capital and surplus while loan commitments and equity investments to all affiliates may not exceed 20% of
unimpaired capital and surplus. All loans to affiliates must be fully secured by eligible collateral. At December 31, 2017, loan
commitments and equity investments were limited to $310 million to a single affiliate and $620 million to all affiliates. The
largest loan commitment and equity investment to a single affiliate was $223 million and the aggregate loan commitments and
equity investments to all affiliates were $323 million. The largest outstanding amount to a single affiliate at December 31, 2017
was $12 million and the total outstanding amounts to all affiliates were $16 million. At December 31, 2016, total loan
commitments and equity investments to all affiliates were $337 million and the total outstanding amounts to all affiliates were
$39 million.
Certain related parties are customers of the Company for services other than loans, including consumer banking, corporate
banking, risk management, wealth management, brokerage and trading, or fiduciary/trust services. The Company engages in
transactions with related parties in the ordinary course of business in compliance with applicable regulations.
The Company rents office space in facilities owned by affiliates of Mr. Kaiser, its Chairman and principal shareholder. Lease
payments totaled $1.0 million for 2017, $1.1 million for 2016 and $975 thousand for 2015. During 2017, the Company also
invested $580 thousand in QRC Valve Distributors, which is indirectly owned by Mr. Kaiser.
QuikTrip Corporation has entered into a fee sharing agreement with TransFund, BOKF’s electronic funds transfer network
(“TransFund”), respecting transactions completed at TransFund automated teller machines placed in QuikTrip locations. In
2017, BOKF paid QuikTrip approximately $8.3 million pursuant to this agreement. During 2017, the Company sold $1.2
million of Oklahoma state income tax credits to QuikTrip Corporation. Mr. Cadieux, a BOK Financial director, is Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman, and a significant shareholder of QuikTrip Corporation.
Cavanal Hill Investment Management, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of BOKF, NA, is the administrator to and investment
advisor for the Cavanal Hill Funds (the "Funds"), a diversified, open-ended investment company established as a business trust
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"). BOKF, NA is custodian and Cavanal Hill Distributors, Inc. is
distributor for the Funds. The Funds’ products are offered to customers, employee benefit plans, trusts and the general public in
the ordinary course of business. Approximately 93% of the Funds’ assets of $3.7 billion are held for the Company's clients. A
Company executive officer serves on the Funds' board of trustees and officers of BOKF, NA serve as president and secretary of
the Funds. A majority of the members of the Funds’ board of trustees are, however, independent of the Company and the Funds
are managed by its board of trustees.
138
(14) Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Litigation Contingencies
As a member of Visa, BOK Financial is obligated for a proportionate share of certain covered litigation losses incurred by Visa
under a retrospective responsibility plan. A contingent liability was recognized for the Company’s share of Visa’s covered
litigation liabilities. Visa funded an escrow account to cover litigation claims, including covered litigation losses under the
retrospective responsibility plan, with proceeds from its initial public offering in 2008 and from available cash.
BOK Financial currently owns 252,233 Visa Class B shares which are convertible into 415,755 shares of Visa Class A shares
after the final settlement of all covered litigation. Class B shares may be diluted in the future if the escrow fund is not adequate
to cover future covered litigation costs. Therefore, no value has been currently assigned to the Class B shares and no value may
be assigned until the Class B shares are converted into a known number of Class A shares.
On June 24, 2015, the Bank received a complaint alleging that an employee had colluded with a bond issuer and an individual
in misusing revenues pledged to municipal bonds for which the Bank served as trustee under the bond indenture. The Company
conducted an investigation and concluded that employees in one of its Corporate Trust offices had, with respect to a single
group of affiliated bond issuances, violated Company policies and procedures by waiving financial covenants, granting
forbearances and accepting without disclosure to the bondholders, debt service payments from sources other than pledged
revenues. The relationship manager was terminated. The Company reported the circumstances to, and cooperated with an
investigation by, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). On December 28, 2015, in an action brought by the SEC,
the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey entered a judgment against the principals involved in issuing the
bonds, precluding the principals from denying the alleged violations of the federal securities laws and requiring the principals
to pay all outstanding principal, accrued interest, and other amounts required under the bond documents (now estimated to be
approximately $48 million, less the value of the facilities securing repayment of the bonds), subject to oversight by a court
appointed monitor. On September 7, 2016, the Bank agreed, and the SEC entered, a consent order finding that the Bank had
violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and requiring the Bank to
disgorge $1,067,721 of fees and pay a civil penalty of $600,000. The Bank has disgorged the fees and paid the penalty.
On August 26, 2016, the Bank was sued in the United States District Court for New Jersey by two bondholders in a putative
class action on behalf of all holders of the bonds alleging the Bank participated in the fraudulent sale of securities by the
principals. On September 14, 2016, the Bank was sued in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma by 19 bondholders
alleging the Bank participated in the fraudulent sale of securities by the principals. Two separate small groups of bondholders
have filed arbitration complaints with the Financial Institutions Regulatory Association respecting the bonds. Management has
been advised by counsel that the Bank has valid defenses to the claims.
On September 15, 2017, the principal of the bond issuances filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The obligation of the principal to
pay all principal and interest on the bonds is non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. The Bank expects the Court ordered payment
plan will result in the payment of the bonds by the principals. Accordingly, no loss is probable at this time and no provision for
loss has been made. If the payment plan does not result in payment of the bonds, a loss could become probable. A reasonable
estimate cannot be made at this time though the amount could be material to the Company.
On March 14, 2017, the Bank was sued in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma by
bondholders in a second putative class action representing a different set of municipal securities. The bondholders in this
second action allege two individuals purchased facilities from the principals who are the subject of the SEC New Jersey
proceedings by means of the fraudulent sale of $60 million of municipal securities for which the Bank also served as indenture
trustee. The bondholders allege the Bank failed to disclose that the seller of the purchased facilities had engaged in the conduct
complained of in the New Jersey action. The Bank properly performed all duties as indenture trustee of this second set of
municipal securities, timely commenced proceedings against the issuer of the securities when default occurred, is cooperating
with the SEC in actions against the two principals, is not a target of the SEC proceedings, and has been advised by counsel that
the Bank has valid defenses to the claims of these bondholders. It is the opinion of management that no loss is probable at this
time.
The County of Bernalillo, New Mexico, commenced arbitration pursuant to the Arbitration Rules of FINRA seeking recovery
of $5.6 million alleging that various municipal bonds purchased by the elected County Treasurer of Bernalillo County, New
Mexico, from BOK Financial Securities, Inc. were unsuitable. The arbitration was conducted in July 2017. The arbitration
panel found the County of Bernalillo’s complaint frivolous and awarded BOK Financial Securities, Inc. attorney fees and
costs. The County has sued in the United States District Court for New Mexico to set aside the award of fees and costs to BOK
Financial Securities but not the finding that the County's complaint was frivolous.
139
On March 30, 2017, two deposit customers of the Bank sued the Bank in the District Court of Harris County, Texas. A
judgment creditor had served a garnishment summons on the Bank. The deposit customers allege that, because the Bank was
unable to produce adequate documentation of ownership of a series of deposit accounts at the Bank owned by them, they were
compelled to enter into a settlement agreement with the judgment creditor pursuant to which the Bank paid $4.2 million from
the accounts to the judgment creditor. The two deposit customers sought $7 million. The claim was mediated resulting in a
settlement in which the Bank paid the plaintiffs $1 million.
On March 7, 2017, a plaintiff filed a putative class action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
alleging an extended overdraft fee charged by BOKF, NA is interest and exceeds permitted rates. BOKF, NA was previously
sued in a class action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma making the same allegations.
Pursuant to a motion to dismiss, the Northern District of Oklahoma Court action was dismissed. Other courts considering the
question whether extended overdraft fees are interest have likewise determined such fees are not interest. BOKF, NA has
moved to dismiss the action. The Northern District of Texas Action was dismissed upon motion by the Bank with leave granted
the plaintiff to file an amended complaint. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The Bank has again moved to dismiss the
complaint, which motion to dismiss is pending before the Court. Management is advised by counsel that a loss is not probable
and that the loss, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated.
In the ordinary course of business, BOK Financial and its subsidiaries are subject to legal actions and complaints. Management
believes, based upon the opinion of counsel, that the actions and liability or loss, if any, resulting from the final outcomes of the
proceedings, will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Alternative Investment Commitments
The Company sponsors two private equity funds and invests in several tax credit entities and other funds as permitted by
banking regulations. Consolidation of these investments is based on the variable interest model determined by the nature of the
entity. Variable interest entities are generally defined as entities that either do not have sufficient equity to finance their
activities without support from other parties or whose equity investors lack a controlling financial interest. Variable interest
entities are consolidated based on the determination that the Company is the primary beneficiary including the power to direct
the activities that most significantly impact the variable interest's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of
the variable interest or the right to receive benefits of the variable interest that could be significant to the variable interest.
BOKF Equity, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, is the general partner of two consolidated private equity funds (“the
Funds”). The Funds provide alternative investment opportunities to certain customers, some of which are related parties,
through unaffiliated limited partnerships. These unaffiliated limited partnerships generally invest in distressed assets, asset buy-
outs or venture capital companies. As general partner, BOKF Equity, LLC has the power to direct activities that most
significantly affect the Funds' performance and contingent obligations to make additional investments totaling $3.4 million at
December 31, 2017. Substantially all of the obligations are offset by limited partner commitments. The Company does not
accrue its contingent liability to fund investments. The Volcker Rule in Title VI of the Dodd-Frank Act will limit both the
amount and structure of these type of investments.
Consolidated tax credit entities represent the Company's interest in entities earning federal new market tax credits related to
qualifying loans for which the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the variable
interest's economic performance of the entity including being the primary beneficiary of or the obligation to absorb losses of
the variable interest that could be significant to the variable interest. The creditors underlying the other borrowings of
consolidated tax credit entities do not have recourse to the general credit of BOKF.
The Company also has interests in various unrelated alternative investments generally consisting of unconsolidated limited
partnership interests in or loans to entities for which investment return is in the form of tax credits or that invest in distressed
real estate loans and properties, energy development, venture capital and other activities. The Company is prohibited by
banking regulations from controlling or actively managing the activities of these investments and the Company's maximum
exposure to loss is restricted to its investment balance. The Company's obligation to fund alternative investments is included in
Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
140
A summary of consolidated and unconsolidated alternative investments as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is as
follows (in thousands):
Consolidated:
Private equity funds
Tax credit entities
Other
Total consolidated
Unconsolidated:
Tax credit entities
Other
Total unconsolidated
Consolidated:
Private equity funds
Tax credit entities
Other
Total consolidated
Unconsolidated:
Tax credit entities
Other
Total unconsolidated
December 31, 2017
Loans
Other
Assets
Other
Liabilities
Other
Borrowings
Non-
controlling
Interests
$
— $
14,783
$
— $
— $
10,000
—
10,964
1,040
—
—
10,964
—
$
10,000
$
26,787
$
— $
10,964
$
11,927
10,000
1,040
22,967
$
$
52,852
$ 153,506
—
38,397
52,852
$ 191,903
$
$
47,859
22,968
70,827
$
$
— $
—
— $
—
—
—
December 31, 2016
Loans
Other
Assets
Other
Liabilities
Other
Borrowings
Non-
controlling
Interests
$
— $
17,357
$
— $
— $
10,000
—
11,585
29,783
—
3,189
10,964
1,092
$
10,000
$
58,725
$
3,189
$
12,056
$
13,237
10,000
8,266
31,503
$
$
44,488
$ 143,715
—
31,675
44,488
$ 175,390
$
$
63,329
15,028
78,357
$
$
— $
—
— $
—
—
—
Other Commitments and Contingencies
Cavanal Hill Funds’ assets include U.S. Treasury and government securities money market funds. Assets of these funds consist
of highly-rated, short-term obligations of the U.S. Treasury and Agencies. The net asset value of units in these funds was $1.00
at December 31, 2017. An investment in these funds is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or guaranteed
by BOK Financial or any of its subsidiaries. BOK Financial may, but is not obligated to purchase assets from these funds to
maintain the net asset value at $1.00. No assets were purchased from the funds in 2017 or 2016.
Total rent expense for BOK Financial was $27.5 million in 2017, $25.8 million in 2016 and $25.2 million in 2015. At
December 31, 2017, future minimum lease payments for premises under operating leases were as follows: $18.9 million in
2018, $19.3 million in 2019, $17.1 million in 2020, $15.0 million in 2021, $9.7 million in 2022 and $73.0 million thereafter.
BOKF, NA is obligated under a long-term lease for its bank premises in downtown Tulsa. The lease term, which began
November 1, 1976, is for fifty-seven years with an option to terminate in 2024 with a two-year prior written notice. Premises
leases may include options to renew at then current market rates and may include escalation provisions based upon changes in
consumer price index or similar benchmarks.
The Federal Reserve Bank requires member banks to maintain certain minimum average cash balances. Member banks may
satisfy reserve balance requirements through holdings of vault cash and balances maintained directly with a Federal Reserve
Bank. The combined average balance of vault cash and balances held at the Federal Reserve Bank was $1.9 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2017 and $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016.
141
(15) Shareholders Equity
Preferred Stock
One billion shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.00005 per share are authorized. The Series A Preferred Stock has no
voting rights except as otherwise provided by Oklahoma corporate law and may be converted into one share of Common Stock
for each 36 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at the option of the holder. Dividends are cumulative at an annual rate of ten
percent of the $0.06 per share liquidation preference value when declared and are payable in cash. Aggregate liquidation
preference is $15 million. No Series A Preferred Stock was outstanding in 2017, 2016 or 2015.
Common Stock
Common stock consists of 2.5 billion authorized shares with a $0.00006 par value. Holders of common shares are entitled to
one vote per share at the election of the Board of Directors and on any question arising at any shareholders’ meeting and to
receive dividends when and as declared. Additionally, regulations restrict the ability of national banks and bank holding
companies to pay dividends.
Subsidiary Bank
The amounts of dividends that BOK Financial’s subsidiary bank can declare and the amounts of loans the subsidiary bank can
extend to affiliates are limited by various federal banking regulations and state corporate law. Generally, dividends declared
during a calendar year are limited to net profits, as defined, for the year plus retained profits for the preceding two years. The
amounts of dividends are further restricted by minimum capital requirements.
Regulatory Capital
BOK Financial and the Bank are subject to various capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure
to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and additional discretionary actions by regulators that
could have a material effect on BOK Financial's operations. These capital requirements include quantitative measures of assets,
liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items. The capital standards are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators.
New capital rules were effective for BOK Financial on January 1, 2015. Components of these rules will phase in through
January 1, 2019. A bank falling below the minimum capital requirements, including the capital conservation buffer, would be
subject to regulatory restrictions on capital distributions (including but not limited to dividends and share repurchases) and
executive bonus payments. For a banking institution to qualify as well capitalized, Common Equity Tier 1, Tier I, Total and
Leverage capital ratios must be at least 6.5%, 8%, 10% and 5%, respectively. Tier I capital consists primarily of common
stockholders' equity, excluding unrealized gains or losses on available for sale securities, less goodwill, core deposit premiums
and certain other intangible assets. Total capital consists primarily of Tier I capital plus preferred stock, subordinated debt and
allowances for credit losses, subject to certain limitations. The Bank exceeded the regulatory definition of well capitalized as of
December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
142
A summary of regulatory capital minimum requirements and levels follows (dollars in thousands):
Minimum
Capital
Requirement
Capital
Conservation
Buffer1
Minimum
Capital
Requirement
Including
Capital
Conservation
Buffer
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
6.00%
6.00%
6.00%
8.00%
8.00%
8.00%
4.00%
4.00%
4.00%
2.50%
N/A
N/A
2.50%
N/A
N/A
7.00%
4.50%
4.50%
3,074,981
12.05% $ 2,834,532
2,870,694
11.34% 2,609,450
N/A
N/A
54,616
8.50%
6.00%
6.00%
$ 3,074,981
12.05% $ 2,834,532
2,870,694
11.34% 2,609,450
N/A
N/A
54,616
2.50%
10.50%
$ 3,455,709
13.54% $ 3,238,323
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8.00%
8.00%
3,105,117
12.27% 2,866,949
N/A
N/A
54,617
4.00%
4.00%
4.00%
$ 3,074,981
9.31% $ 2,834,532
2,870,694
8.73% 2,609,450
N/A
N/A
54,616
11.21 %
10.65 %
10.03 %
11.21 %
10.65 %
10.03 %
12.81 %
11.70 %
10.03 %
8.72 %
8.11 %
8.37 %
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets):
Consolidated
BOKF, NA
Mobank2
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted
Assets):
Consolidated
BOKF, NA
Mobank2
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted
Assets):
Consolidated
BOKF, NA
Mobank2
Leverage (Tier I Capital to
Average Assets):
Consolidated
BOKF, NA
Mobank2
1 Capital conservation buffer is effective January 1, 2016 and is phased in through 2019. The phased in capital conservation buffer was
1.25% at December 31, 2017 and 0.625% at December 31, 2016. The fully phased in requirement of 2.50% is included in the table above.
2 Missouri Bank and Trust Company of Kansas City dba Mobank was acquired by BOK Financial effective December 1, 2016 and was
merged into BOKF, NA effective February 17, 2017.
143
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
AOCI includes unrealized gains and losses on available for sale ("AFS") securities and non-credit related unrealized losses on
AFS securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment has been recorded in earnings. AOCI also includes unrealized
gains on AFS securities that were transferred from AFS to investment securities in 2011. Such amounts were amortized over the
estimated remaining life of the security as an adjustment to yield, offsetting the related amortization of premium on the
transferred securities. Unrealized losses on employee benefit plans will be reclassified into income as pension plan costs are
recognized over the remaining service period of plan participants. Accumulated losses on the interest rate lock hedge of the
subordinated debt issuance in 2005 were reclassified into income over the ten-year life of the debt. Gains and losses in AOCI
are net of deferred income taxes.
A rollforward of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is included as follows (in thousands):
Balance, December 31, 2014
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
Reclassification adjustments included in earnings:
Interest revenue, Investment securities, Taxable securities
Interest expense, Subordinated debentures
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
Gain on available for sale securities, net
Other comprehensive income (loss), before income taxes
Federal and state income tax1
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
Balance, December 31, 2015
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
Reclassification adjustments included in earnings:
Interest revenue, Investment securities, Taxable securities
Interest expense, Subordinated debentures
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
Gain on available for sale securities, net
Other comprehensive income (loss), before income taxes
Federal and state income tax1
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
Balance, December 31, 2016
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
Reclassification adjustments included in earnings:
Interest revenue, Investment securities, Taxable securities
Interest expense, Subordinated debentures
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
Gain on available for sale securities, net
Other comprehensive income (loss), before income taxes
Federal and state income tax1
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
Reclassification of stranded accumulated other
comprehensive loss related to tax reform
Balance, December 31, 2017
1 Calculated using 39% effective tax rate.
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on
Available
for Sale
Securities
Investment
Securities
Transferred
from AFS
Employee
Benefit
Plans
Loss on
Effective
Cash Flow
Hedges
Total
$
59,239
$
376
$
(2,868) $
(74) $
56,673
(48,607)
—
1,804
—
(46,803)
—
—
1,819
(12,058)
(58,846)
(22,891)
(35,955)
23,284
(41,333)
—
—
—
(11,675)
(53,008)
(20,637)
(32,371)
(9,087)
(28,170)
—
—
—
(4,428)
(32,598)
(12,708)
(19,890)
(6,408)
(503)
—
—
—
(503)
(195)
(308)
68
—
(112)
—
—
—
(112)
(44)
(68)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,804
701
1,103
(1,765)
(188)
—
—
—
—
(188)
(73)
(115)
(1,880)
2,018
—
—
—
—
2,018
785
1,233
(142)
—
121
—
—
121
47
74
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(503)
121
1,819
(12,058)
(57,424)
(22,338)
(35,086)
21,587
(41,521)
(112)
—
—
(11,675)
(53,308)
(20,754)
(32,554)
(10,967)
(26,152)
—
—
—
(4,428)
(30,580)
(11,923)
(18,657)
(6,550)
$
(35,385) $
— $
(789) $
— $
(36,174)
144
(16) Earnings Per Share
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (dollars in thousands, except per share
data):
Year Ended
2017
2016
2015
Numerator:
Net income attributable to BOK Financial Corp. shareholders
$
334,644
$
232,668
$
288,565
Less: Earnings allocated to participating securities
Numerator for basic earnings per share – income available to common shareholders
Effect of reallocating undistributed earnings of participating securities
3,561
2,883
331,083
229,785
2
1
3,383
285,182
3
Numerator for diluted earnings per share – income available to common shareholders
$
331,085
$
229,786
$
285,185
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding
65,440,832
65,901,110
68,397,215
Less: Participating securities included in weighted average shares outstanding
695,468
815,483
802,526
Denominator for basic earnings per common share
Dilutive effect of employee stock compensation plans1
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
1 Excludes employee stock options with exercise prices greater than current market price.
(17) Reportable Segments
64,745,364
65,085,627
67,594,689
60,920
58,271
96,969
64,806,284
65,143,898
67,691,658
$
$
$
$
5.11
5.11
—
$
$
3.53
3.53
—
4.22
4.21
—
BOK Financial operates three principal lines of business: Commercial Banking, Consumer Banking and Wealth Management.
Commercial Banking includes lending, treasury and cash management services and customer risk management products to
small businesses, middle market and larger commercial customers. Commercial Banking also includes the TransFund EFT
network. Consumer Banking includes retail lending and deposit services, lending and deposit services to small business
customers served through the consumer branch network and all mortgage banking activities. Wealth Management provides
fiduciary services, private bank services and investment advisory services in all markets. Wealth Management also underwrites
state and municipal securities and engages in brokerage and trading activities.
In addition to its lines of business, BOK Financial has a Funds Management unit. The primary purpose of this unit is to manage
overall liquidity needs and interest rate risk. Each line of business borrows funds from and provides funds to the Funds
Management unit as needed to support their operations. Operating results for Funds Management and other include the effect of
interest rate risk positions and risk management activities, securities gains and losses including impairment charges, the
provision for credit losses in excess of net loans charged off, tax planning strategies and certain executive compensation costs
that are not attributed to the lines of business.
BOK Financial allocates resources and evaluates performance of its lines of business after allocation of funds, actual net credit
losses and capital costs. In addition, we measure the performance of our business lines after allocation of certain indirect
expenses and taxes on statutory rates. The allocation for the prior comparable periods have been revised on a comparable basis.
The cost of funds borrowed from the Funds Management unit by the operating lines of business is transfer priced at rates that
approximate market rates for funds with similar duration. Market rates are generally based on the applicable LIBOR or interest
rate swap rates, adjusted for prepayment risk. This method of transfer-pricing funds that support assets of the operating lines of
business tends to insulate them from interest rate risk.
145
The value of funds provided by the operating lines of business to the Funds Management unit is based on rates which
approximate the wholesale market rates for funds with similar duration and re-pricing characteristics. Market rates are
generally based on LIBOR or interest rate swap rates. The funds credit formula applied to deposit products with indeterminate
maturities is established based on their re-pricing characteristics reflected in a combination of the short-term LIBOR rates and a
moving average of an intermediate term swap rate, with an appropriate spread applied to both. Shorter duration products are
weighted towards the short-term LIBOR rate and longer duration products are weighted towards intermediate swap rates. The
expected duration ranges from 30 days for certain rate-sensitive deposits to five years.
Substantially all revenue is from domestic customers. No single external customer accounts for more than 10% of total
revenue.
Net loans charged off and provision for credit losses represents net loans charged off as attributed to the lines of business and
the provision for credit losses in excess of net charge-offs attributed to Funds Management and Other.
The acquisition of Mobank on December 1, 2016 was allocated to the operating segments on February 21, 2017 when Mobank
was mered into BOKF, NA. Operations, assets and liabilities of Mobank were included in Funds Management and Other during
this time period.
Reportable segments reconciliation to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 is as
follows (in thousands):
Net interest and dividend revenue from external
sources
Net interest revenue (expense) from internal
sources
Net interest and dividend revenue
Provision for credit losses
Net interest and dividend revenue after
provision for credit losses
Other operating revenue
Other operating expense
Net direct contribution
Gain (loss) on financial instruments, net
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing
rights
Gain (loss) on repossessed assets, net
Corporate expense allocations
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling
interests
Net income attributable to BOK Financial Corp.
shareholders
Average assets
Commercial
Consumer
Wealth
Management
Funds
Management
and Other
BOK
Financial
Consolidated
$
588,938
$
96,360
$
45,024
$
111,379
$
841,701
(84,290)
504,648
13,881
490,767
206,110
226,334
470,543
52
—
(2,681)
33,958
433,956
168,809
265,147
47,218
143,578
4,783
138,795
196,231
224,323
110,703
(3,331)
172
223
67,761
40,006
15,562
24,444
38,344
83,368
(696)
84,064
301,434
246,626
138,872
—
—
387
40,562
98,697
38,393
60,304
(1,272)
110,107
(24,968)
135,075
(8,681)
328,234
(201,840)
3,279
(172)
2,071
(142,281)
(54,381)
(40,171)
(14,210)
—
841,701
(7,000)
848,701
695,094
1,025,517
518,278
—
—
—
—
518,278
182,593
335,685
—
—
—
1,041
1,041
$
265,147
$ 17,517,217
$
$
24,444
$
60,304
$
(15,251) $
334,644
8,956,713
$
7,072,622
$
(599,058) $
32,947,494
146
Reportable segments reconciliation to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as
follows (in thousands):
Net interest and dividend revenue from external
sources
Net interest revenue (expense) from internal
sources
Net interest and dividend revenue
Provision for credit losses
Net interest and dividend revenue after
provision for credit losses
Other operating revenue
Other operating expense
Net direct contribution
Gain (loss) on financial instruments, net
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing
rights
Gain on repossessed assets, net
Corporate expense allocations
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
Net income attributable to BOK Financial Corp.
shareholders
Average assets
Commercial
Consumer
Wealth
Management
Funds
Management
and Other
BOK
Financial
Consolidated
$
492,967
$
85,998
$
33,006
$
135,257
$
747,228
(58,781)
434,186
32,959
401,227
195,521
216,451
380,297
10
—
669
35,760
345,216
134,289
210,927
—
$
210,927
$ 16,998,626
$
$
37,777
123,775
4,927
118,848
224,802
249,744
93,906
(26,252)
(2,193)
979
66,411
29
11
18
—
18
8,722,372
$
$
29,043
62,049
(801)
62,850
283,222
250,994
95,078
(42)
—
—
42,378
52,658
20,484
32,174
—
32,174
6,281,127
(8,039)
127,218
27,915
99,303
(29,525)
300,401
(230,623)
26,284
2,193
(1,648)
(144,549)
(59,245)
(48,407)
(10,838)
(387)
—
747,228
65,000
682,228
674,020
1,017,590
338,658
—
—
—
—
338,658
106,377
232,281
(387)
$
$
(10,451) $
232,668
276,277
$
32,278,402
147
Reportable segments reconciliation to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 is as
follows (in thousands):
Net interest and dividend revenue from external
sources
Net interest revenue (expense) from internal
sources
Net interest and dividend revenue
Provision for credit losses
Net interest and dividend revenue after
provision for credit losses
Other operating revenue
Other operating expense
Net direct contribution
Loss on financial instruments, net
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing
rights
Gain on repossessed assets, net
Corporate expense allocations
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling
interests
Net income attributable to BOK Financial Corp.
shareholders
Average assets
Commercial
Consumer
Wealth
Management
Funds
Management
and Other
BOK
Financial
Consolidated
$
439,751
$
84,848
$
24,744
$
154,011
$
703,354
(52,313)
387,438
(6,748)
394,186
177,729
202,804
369,111
—
—
708
43,279
326,540
127,024
199,516
28,503
113,351
6,934
106,417
218,095
203,070
121,442
(4,712)
(4,853)
916
74,936
37,857
14,726
23,131
24,043
48,787
(1,083)
49,870
267,523
228,664
88,729
(204)
—
—
40,357
48,168
18,737
29,431
(233)
153,778
34,897
118,881
(4,867)
261,653
(147,639)
4,916
4,853
(1,624)
(158,572)
19,078
(21,103)
40,181
—
703,354
34,000
669,354
658,480
896,191
431,643
—
—
—
—
431,643
139,384
292,259
—
—
—
3,694
3,694
$
199,516
$ 16,284,527
$
$
23,131
$
29,431
$
36,487
8,836,327
$
5,444,483
$
9,418
$
$
288,565
30,574,755
148
(18) Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined by applicable accounting guidance as the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants in the principal market for the given asset or liability at the measurement date based on
market conditions at that date. An orderly transaction assumes exposure to the market for a customary period for marketing
activities prior to the measurement date and not a forced liquidation or distressed sale. Certain assets and liabilities are recorded
in the Company’s financial statements at fair value. Some are recorded on a recurring basis and some on a non-recurring basis.
For some assets and liabilities, observable market transactions and market information might be available. For other assets and
liabilities, observable market transactions and market information might not be available. A hierarchy for fair value has been
established which categorizes into three levels the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The three levels
are as follows:
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1) - fair value is based on unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) - fair value is based on significant other observable inputs which are
generally determined based on a single price for each financial instrument provided to us by an applicable third-party
pricing service and is based on one or more of the following:
• Quoted prices for similar, but not identical, assets or liabilities in active markets;
• Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets;
•
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, such as interest rate and yield curves, volatilities, prepayment
speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates;
• Other inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market inputs.
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) - fair value is based upon model-based valuation techniques for which at least
one significant assumption is not observable in the market.
Transfers between levels are recognized as of the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers in or out of quoted prices
in active markets for identical instruments to significant other observable inputs or significant unobservable inputs during the
year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Transfers between significant other observable inputs and significant
unobservable inputs during the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are included in the summary of changes in recurring
fair values measured using unobservable inputs.
The underlying methods used by the third-party pricing services are considered in determining the primary inputs used to
determine fair values. Management has evaluated the methodologies employed by the third-party pricing services by
comparing the price provided by the pricing service with other sources, including brokers' quotes, sales or purchases of similar
instruments and discounted cash flows to establish a basis for reliance on the pricing service values. Significant differences
between the pricing service provided value and other sources are discussed with the pricing service to understand the basis for
their values. Based on all observable inputs, management may adjust prices obtained from third-party pricing services to more
appropriately reflect the prices that would be received to sell assets or paid to transfer liabilities in orderly transactions in the
current market. No significant adjustments were made to prices provided by third-party pricing services at December 31, 2017
and 2016.
149
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis is as follows as of December 31, 2017 (in
thousands):
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
Total
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Assets:
Trading securities:
U.S. government agency debentures
$
21,196
$
— $
21,196
$
U.S. agency residential mortgage-backed securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
Asset-backed securities
Other trading securities
Total trading securities
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Treasury securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
Privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Other debt securities
Perpetual preferred stock
Equity securities and mutual funds
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities – U.S. government agency residential
mortgage-backed securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Mortgage servicing rights, net1
Derivative contracts, net of cash margin2
Liabilities:
Derivative contracts, net of cash margin2
392,673
13,559
23,885
11,363
462,676
1,000
27,080
5,309,152
93,221
2,834,961
25,481
15,767
14,916
—
—
—
—
—
1,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
392,673
13,559
23,885
11,363
462,676
—
22,278
5,309,152
93,221
2,834,961
25,009
15,767
14,916
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4,802
—
—
—
472
—
—
8,321,578
1,000
8,315,304
5,274
755,054
221,378
252,867
220,502
—
—
—
755,054
209,079
—
8,179
212,323
171,963
—
171,963
—
12,299
252,867
—
—
1 A reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value of mortgage servicing rights and disclosures of significant assumptions used to
determine fair value are presented in Note 7, Mortgage Banking Activities.
2 See Note 3 for detail of fair value of derivative contracts by contract type. Derivative contracts in a net asset position that were valued
based on quoted prices in active markets or identical instruments (Level 1) are exchange-traded interest rate, energy and agricultural
derivative contracts, net of cash margin. Derivative contracts in a net liability position that were valued using quoted prices in active
markets for identical instruments (Level 1) are exchange-traded interest rate and energy derivative contracts, fully offset by cash margin.
150
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis is as follows as of December 31, 2016 (in
thousands):
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
Total
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Assets:
Trading securities:
U.S. government agency debentures
$
6,234
$
— $
6,234
$
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
Asset-backed securities
Other trading securities
Total trading securities
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Treasury securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
Privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Other debt securities
Perpetual preferred stock
Equity securities and mutual funds
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities – U.S. government agency residential
mortgage-backed securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Mortgage servicing rights, net1
Derivative contracts, net of cash margin2
Liabilities:
Derivative contracts, net of cash margin 2
310,067
14,427
—
6,900
337,628
999
40,993
5,460,386
115,535
3,017,933
4,152
18,474
18,357
8,676,829
77,046
301,897
247,073
689,872
—
—
—
—
—
999
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,495
4,494
—
—
—
310,067
14,427
—
6,900
337,628
—
35,204
5,460,386
115,535
3,017,933
—
18,474
14,862
8,662,394
77,046
290,280
—
7,541
682,331
664,531
6,972
657,559
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5,789
—
—
—
4,152
—
—
9,941
—
11,617
247,073
—
—
1 A reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value of mortgage servicing rights and disclosures of significant assumptions used to
determine fair value are presented in Note 7, Mortgage Banking Activities.
2 See Note 3 for detail of fair value of derivative contracts by contract type. Derivative contracts in a net asset position that were valued
based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments (Level 1) are exchange-traded interest rate and energy derivative
contracts, net of cash margin. Derivative contracts in a net liability position that were valued using quoted prices in active markets for
identical instruments based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments (Level 1) are exchange-traded interest rate, energy
and agricultural derivative contracts, net of cash margin.
151
Following is a description of the Company's valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured on a recurring
basis:
Securities
The fair values of trading, available for sale and fair value option securities are based on quoted prices for identical instruments
in active markets, when available. If quoted prices for identical instruments are not available, fair values are based on
significant other observable inputs such as quoted prices of comparable instruments or interest rates and credit spreads, yield
curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds and loss severities.
The fair value of certain available for sale municipal and other debt securities may be based on significant unobservable inputs.
These significant unobservable inputs include limited observed trades, projected cash flows, current credit rating of the issuers
and, when applicable, the insurers of the debt and observed trades of similar debt. Discount rates are primarily based on
reference to interest rate spreads on comparable securities of similar duration and credit rating as determined by the nationally-
recognized rating agencies adjusted for a lack of trading volume. Significant unobservable inputs are developed by investment
securities professionals involved in the active trading of similar securities. A summary of significant inputs used to value these
securities follows. A management committee composed of senior members from the Company's Capital Markets, Risk
Management and Finance departments assess the appropriateness of these inputs quarterly.
Derivatives
All derivative instruments are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. Fair values for exchange-traded contracts are based on
quoted prices. Fair values for over-the-counter interest rate, commodity and foreign exchange contracts are based on valuations
provided either by third-party dealers in the contracts, quotes provided by independent pricing services, or a third-party
provided pricing model that uses significant other observable market inputs.
Credit risk is considered in determining the fair value of derivative instruments. Management determines fair value adjustments
based on various risk factors including but not limited to counterparty credit rating or equivalent loan grading, derivative
contract notional size, price volatility of the underlying commodity, duration of the derivative contracts and expected loss
severity. Expected loss severity is based on historical losses for similarly risk graded commercial loan customers. Decreases in
counterparty credit rating or grading and increases in price volatility and expected loss severity all tend to increase the credit
quality adjustment which reduces the fair value of asset contracts.
We also consider our own credit risk in determining the fair value of derivative contracts. Changes in our credit rating would
affect the fair value of our derivative liabilities. In the event of a credit downgrade, the fair value of our derivative liabilities
would increase.
Residential Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Residential mortgage loans held for sale are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair values of conforming residential
mortgage loans held for sale are based upon quoted market prices of such loans sold in securitization transactions, including
related unfunded loan commitments. The fair value of mortgage loans that are unable to be sold to U.S. government agencies is
determined using quoted prices of loans that are sold in securitization transactions with a liquidity discount applied.
152
The following represents the changes related to assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant
unobservable inputs (in thousands):
Available for Sale
Securities
Municipal
and other
tax-exempt
securities
Other debt
securities
Residential
mortgage
loans held
for sale
$
9,610
$
4,151
$
Balance, December 31, 2015
Transfer to Level 3 from Level 21
Purchases and capital calls
Redemptions and distributions
Proceeds from sales
Gain (loss) recognized in earnings:
Mortgage banking revenue
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2016
Transfer to Level 3 from Level 21
Purchases and capital calls
Redemptions and distributions
Proceeds from sales
Gain (loss) recognized in earnings:
Mortgage banking revenue
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
—
—
(3,975)
—
—
154
5,789
—
—
(1,100)
—
—
113
—
—
—
—
—
1
4,152
—
—
—
7,874
6,631
—
—
(2,540)
(348)
—
11,617
3,507
—
—
(3,900)
(2,944)
—
220
119
—
Balance, December 31, 2017
12,299
1 Recurring transfers to Level 3 from Level 2 consist of residential mortgage loans intended for sale to U.S. government agencies that fail to
4,802
472
$
$
$
meet conforming standards.
153
A summary of quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3) as of December 31, 2017 follows (in thousands):
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Amortized
Cost/
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Par
Value
Fair
Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Significant
Unobservable
Input
Range
(Weighted Average)
Available for sale securities:
Municipal and other tax-
exempt securities
$
5,095
$
5,068
$
4,802
Discounted cash flows
Other debt securities
500
500
472
Discounted cash flows
Residential mortgage loans
held for sale
N/A
12,981
12,299
Quoted prices of loans
sold in securitization
transactions, with a
liquidity discount
applied
1
1
Interest rate
spread
Interest rate
spread
Liquidity
discount applied
to the market
value of
mortgage loans
qualifying for
sale to U.S.
government
agencies
6.60%-6.60% (6.60%)
92.25%-94.76% (93.75%)
6.85% - 6.85% (6.85%)
94.39% - 94.39% (94.39%)
2
3
4
3
94.75%
1 Discounted cash flows developed using discount rates primarily based on reference to interest rate spreads for comparable securities of similar duration and
credit rating as determined by the nationally-recognized rating agencies, adjusted for lack of trading volume.
2 Interest rate yields used to value investment grade tax-exempt securities represent a spread of 372 to 466 basis points over average yields for comparable
tax-exempt securities.
3 Represents fair value as a percentage of par value.
4 Interest rate yields used to value investment grade taxable securities based on comparable short-term taxable securities which are generally yielding
approximately 3%.
A summary of quantitative information about Recurring Fair Value Measurements based on Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) as of December 31, 2016 follows (in thousands):
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Par
Value
Amortized
Cost6
Fair
Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Significant
Unobservable
Input
Range
(Weighted Average)
Available for sale securities:
Municipal and other tax-
exempt securities
$
6,195
$
6,163
$
5,789
Discounted cash flows
Other debt securities
4,400
4,400
4,152
Discounted cash flows
1
1
Interest rate
spread
Interest rate
spread
5.91%-6.21% (6.16%)
90.00%-93.40% (92.20%)
6.01% - 6.26% (6.23%)
94.34% - 94.36% (94.36%)
2
3
4
3
Residential mortgage loans
held for sale
N/A
12,431
11,617
Liquidity
discount applied
to the market
value of
mortgage loans
qualifying for
sale to U.S.
government
agencies
Quoted prices of loans
sold in securitization
transactions, with a
liquidity discount
applied
93.45%
1 Discounted cash flows developed using discount rates primarily based on reference to interest rate spreads for comparable securities of similar duration and
credit rating as determined by the nationally-recognized rating agencies, adjusted for lack of trading volume.
2 Interest rate yields used to value investment grade tax-exempt securities represent a spread of 467 to 525 basis points over average yields for comparable
tax-exempt securities.
3 Represents fair value as a percentage of par value.
4 Interest rate yields used to value investment grade taxable securities based on comparable short-term taxable securities which are generally yielding less than
1%.
154
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include pension plan assets, which are based on quoted prices in active
markets for identical instruments, collateral for certain impaired loans and real property and other assets acquired to satisfy
loans, which are based primarily on comparisons to completed sales of similar assets. See Note 6 for information related to the
non-recurring fair value measurement of Mobank.
The following represents the carrying value of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and related losses
recorded during the year. The carrying value represents only those assets with the balance sheet date for which the fair value
was adjusted during the year:
Carrying Value at December 31, 2017
Fair Value Adjustments for the
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Recognized In:
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Gross charge-
offs against
allowance for
loan losses
Net losses and
expenses of
repossessed
assets, net
Impaired loans
Real estate and other repossessed assets
$
— $
—
$
7,436
3,483
$
7,626
5,481
$
12,145
—
—
6,372
Carrying Value at December 31, 2016
Fair Value Adjustments for the
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Recognized In:
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Gross charge-
offs against
allowance for
loan losses
Net losses and
expenses of
repossessed
assets, net
Impaired loans
Real estate and other repossessed assets
$
— $
—
$
539
7,965
$
11,295
2,192
$
7,594
—
—
2,527
The fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans and real estate and other repossessed assets and the related fair value
adjustments are generally based on unadjusted third-party appraisals. Our appraisal review policies require appraised values to
be supported by observed inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Appraisals that are not
based on observable inputs or that require significant adjustments or fair value measurements that are not based on third-party
appraisals are considered to be based on significant unobservable inputs. Non-recurring fair value measurements of collateral-
dependent impaired loans and real estate and other repossessed assets based on significant unobservable inputs are generally
due to estimates of current fair values between appraisal dates. Significant unobservable inputs include listing prices for
comparable assets, uncorroborated expert opinions or management's knowledge of the collateral or industry. Non-recurring fair
value measurements of collateral dependent loans secured by mineral rights are generally determined by our internal staff of
engineers on projected cash flows under current market conditions and are based on significant unobservable inputs. Projected
cash flows are discounted according to risk characteristics of the underlying oil and gas properties. Assets are evaluated to
demonstrate with reasonable certainty that crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids can be recovered from known oil and
gas reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions at current prices with existing conventional equipment,
operating methods and costs. Significant unobservable inputs are developed by asset management and workout professionals
and approved by senior Credit Administration executives.
155
A summary of quantitative information about Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements based on Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3) as of December 31, 2017 follows (in thousands):
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements
Impaired loans
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique(s)
$
7,626 Discounted cash
flows
Real estate and other repossessed assets
5,481 Discounted cash
flows
1 Represents fair value as a percentage of the unpaid principal balance.
Significant Unobservable Input
Recoverable oil and gas reserves,
forward-looking commodity prices and
estimated operating costs
Recoverable oil and gas reserves,
forward-looking commodity prices,
estimated operating costs
Range
(Weighted Average)
40% - 86% (59%)1
N/A
A summary of quantitative information about Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements based on Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3) as of December 31, 2016 follows (in thousands):
Impaired loans
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique(s)
$ 11,295 Discounted cash
flows
Significant Unobservable Input
Recoverable oil and gas reserves,
forward-looking commodity prices and
estimated operating costs
Real estate and other repossessed assets
2,192 Appraised value,
as adjusted
1 Represents fair value as a percentage of the unpaid principal balance.
2 Marketability adjustments include consideration of estimated costs to sell which is approximately 10% of the fair value.
Marketability adjustments off
appraised value2
Range
(Weighted Average)
22% - 59% (57%)1
70% - 87% (74%)
The fair value of pension plan assets was approximately $40 million at December 31, 2017 and $42 million at December 31,
2016, determined by significant other observable inputs. Fair value adjustments of pension plan assets along with changes in
the projected benefit obligation are recognized in other comprehensive income.
156
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of all financial instruments, including those financial
assets and liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring (dollars in
thousands):
December 31, 2017
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
$
602,510
602,510
602,510
1,714,544
1,714,544
1,714,544
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
5,309,152
5,309,152
Privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities
93,221
93,221
Commercial mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S.
Cash and due from banks
Interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents
Trading securities:
U.S. government agency debentures
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
Asset-backed securities
Other trading securities
Total trading securities
Investment securities:
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
Other debt securities
Total investment securities
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Treasury securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
government agencies
Other debt securities
Perpetual preferred stock
Equity securities and mutual funds
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities – U.S. government agency residential
mortgage-backed securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Loans:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total loans
Allowance for loan losses
Loans, net of allowance
Mortgage servicing rights
Derivative instruments with positive fair value, net of cash margin
Deposits with no stated maturity
Time deposits
Other borrowed funds
Subordinated debentures
Derivative instruments with negative fair value, net of cash margin
21,196
392,673
13,559
23,885
11,363
21,196
392,673
13,559
23,885
11,363
462,676
438,791
228,186
15,891
217,716
461,793
1,000
27,080
230,349
16,242
233,444
480,035
1,000
27,080
2,834,961
2,834,961
25,481
15,767
14,916
25,481
15,767
14,916
755,054
221,378
755,054
221,378
10,733,975
10,524,627
3,479,987
1,973,686
965,776
3,428,733
1,977,721
956,706
17,153,424
16,887,787
(230,682)
—
16,922,742
16,887,787
252,867
220,502
252,867
220,502
19,962,889
19,962,889
2,064,558
5,703,121
148,207
171,963
2,098,416
5,709,860
144,677
171,963
157
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
21,196
392,673
13,559
23,885
11,363
438,791
230,349
16,242
233,444
480,035
—
22,278
5,309,152
93,221
2,834,961
25,009
15,767
14,916
755,054
208,946
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4,802
—
—
—
472
—
—
5,274
—
12,432
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10,524,627
3,428,733
1,977,721
956,706
16,887,787
—
16,887,787
252,867
8,179
212,323
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
148,207
171,963
19,962,889
2,064,558
5,703,121
—
—
8,321,578
8,321,578
1,000
8,315,304
December 31, 2016
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
$
620,846
$
620,846
620,846
1,916,651
1,916,651
1,916,651
— $
—
Cash and due from banks
Interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents
Trading securities:
U.S. government agency debentures
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
Asset-backed securities
Other trading securities
Total trading securities
Investment securities:
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
Other debt securities
Total investment securities
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Treasury securities
Municipal and other tax-exempt securities
6,234
310,067
14,427
—
6,900
6,234
310,067
14,427
—
6,900
337,628
337,628
320,364
20,777
205,004
546,145
999
40,993
321,225
21,473
222,795
565,493
999
40,993
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities
5,460,386
5,460,386
Privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities
115,535
115,535
Commercial mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies
Other debt securities
Perpetual preferred stock
Equity securities and mutual funds
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities – U.S. government agency residential
mortgage-backed securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Loans:
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Total loans
Allowance for loan losses
Loans, net of allowance
Mortgage servicing rights
Derivative instruments with positive fair value, net of cash margin
Deposits with no stated maturity
Time deposits
Other borrowed funds
Subordinated debentures
Derivative instruments with negative fair value, net of cash margin
3,017,933
3,017,933
4,152
18,474
18,357
4,152
18,474
18,357
8,676,829
8,676,829
77,046
301,897
77,046
301,897
10,390,824
10,437,016
3,809,046
1,949,832
839,958
3,850,981
2,025,159
864,904
16,989,660
17,178,060
(246,159)
—
16,743,501
17,178,060
247,073
689,872
247,073
689,872
20,526,295
20,526,295
2,221,800
5,572,662
144,640
664,531
2,218,303
5,556,327
128,903
664,531
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5,789
—
—
—
4,152
—
—
9,941
—
11,617
10,437,016
3,850,981
2,025,159
864,904
17,178,060
—
17,178,060
247,073
—
20,526,295
2,218,303
5,556,327
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
999
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,495
4,494
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6,234
310,067
14,427
—
6,900
337,628
321,225
21,473
222,795
565,493
—
35,204
5,460,386
115,535
3,017,933
—
18,474
14,862
8,662,394
77,046
290,280
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7,541
682,331
—
—
—
—
6,972
—
—
—
128,903
657,559
Because no market exists for certain of these financial instruments and management does not intend to sell these financial
instruments, the fair values shown in the tables above may not represent values at which the respective financial instruments
could be sold individually or in the aggregate at the given reporting date.
158
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The book value reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and short-term instruments approximates those assets’ fair
values.
Securities
The fair values of securities are generally based on Significant Other Observable Inputs such as quoted prices for comparable
instruments or interest rates and credit spreads, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds and loss severities.
Loans
The fair value of loans, excluding loans held for sale, are based on discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates and credit
and liquidity spreads currently being offered for loans with similar remaining terms to maturity and risk, adjusted for the impact
of interest rate floors and ceilings which are classified as Significant Unobservable Inputs. The fair values of loans were
estimated to approximate their discounted cash flows less loan loss allowances allocated to these loans of $208 million at
December 31, 2017 and $218 million at December 31, 2016. A summary of assumptions used in determining the fair value of
loans follows:
December 31, 2017
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
December 31, 2016
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Residential mortgage
Personal
Deposits
Range of
Contractual
Yields
Average
Re-pricing
(in years)
Discount
Rate
0.38% - 30.00%
0.38% - 18.00%
1.74% - 18.00%
1.18% - 21.00%
0.38% - 30.00%
0.38% - 18.00%
1.74% - 18.00%
0.25% - 21.00%
0.64
0.80
2.27
0.23
0.70
0.71
2.27
0.40
0.77% - 4.67%
1.04% - 4.41%
2.11% - 4.09%
0.56% - 4.81%
0.64% - 4.60%
0.94% - 4.27%
1.71% - 4.26%
1.03% - 4.59%
The fair values of time deposits are based on discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered on
similar transactions which are considered Significant Unobservable Inputs. Estimated fair value of deposits with no stated
maturity, which includes demand deposits, transaction deposits, money market deposits and savings accounts, is equal to the
amount payable on demand. Although market premiums paid reflect an additional value for these low cost deposits, adjusting
fair value for the expected benefit of these deposits is prohibited. Accordingly, the positive effect of such deposits is not
included in the tables above. A summary of assumptions used in determining the fair value of time deposits follows:
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Range of
Contractual
Yields
0.03% - 9.64%
0.02% - 9.65%
Average
Re-pricing
(in years)
1.91
1.96
Discount
Rate
2.18% - 2.36%
1.57% - 2.00%
159
Other Borrowed Funds and Subordinated Debentures
The fair values of these instruments are based upon discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered
on similar instruments which are considered Significant Unobservable Inputs. A summary of assumptions used in determining
the fair value of other borrowings and subordinated debentures follows:
December 31, 2017
Other borrowed funds
Subordinated debentures
December 31, 2016
Other borrowed funds
Subordinated debentures
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments
Range of
Contractual
Yields
Average
Re-pricing
(in years)
Discount
Rate
0.25% - 3.49%
5.38%
0.25% - 3.50%
5.38%
0.00
16.79
0.00
16.86
1.33% - 4.04%
4.61%
0.55% - 3.22%
6.11%
The fair values of commercial loan commitments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking
into account the remaining terms of the agreements. The fair values of these off-balance sheet instruments were not significant
at December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
Fair Value Election
As more fully disclosed in Note 2 and Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has elected to carry all
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities held as economic hedges against changes in the fair value of
mortgage servicing rights and all residential mortgage loans originated for sale at fair value. Changes in the fair value of these
financial instruments are recognized in earnings.
160
(19) Parent Company Only Financial Statements
Summarized financial information for BOK Financial – Parent Company Only follows:
Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Available for sale securities
Investment in bank subsidiaries
Investment in non-bank subsidiaries
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Other liabilities
Other borrowings – Trust preferred debt
Subordinated debentures
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock
Capital surplus
Retained earnings
Treasury stock
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total shareholders’ equity
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Statements of Earnings
(In thousands)
December 31,
2017
2016
$
205,876
$
163,418
16,185
19,234
3,255,912
3,067,595
170,966
4,065
177,068
4,865
$
3,653,004
$
3,432,180
$
12,960
$
—
144,677
157,637
5,469
7,217
144,640
157,326
4
4
1,035,895
3,048,487
(552,845)
(36,174)
1,006,535
2,823,334
(544,052)
(10,967)
3,495,367
3,274,854
$
3,653,004
$
3,432,180
Dividends, interest and fees received from bank subsidiaries
$
150,149
$
15,237
$
150,308
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
Dividends, interest and fees received from non-bank subsidiaries
Other revenue
Total revenue
Interest expense
Other operating expense
Total expense
Income before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Federal and state income taxes
Income before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Equity in undistributed income of bank subsidiaries
Equity in undistributed income of non-bank subsidiaries
17,500
936
168,585
8,239
2,014
10,253
158,332
(4,305)
162,637
181,552
(9,545)
25,923
1,612
42,772
4,182
1,978
6,160
36,612
(1,920)
38,532
216,120
(21,984)
—
1,279
151,587
131
2,242
2,373
149,214
(375)
149,589
134,045
4,931
Net income attributable to BOK Financial Corp. shareholders
$
334,644
$
232,668
$
288,565
161
Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed income of bank subsidiaries
Equity in undistributed income of non-bank subsidiaries
Change in other assets
Change in other liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities
Investment in subsidiaries
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net change in other borrowings
Issuance of subordinated debentures, net of issuance costs
Issuance of common and treasury stock, net
Dividends paid
Repurchase of common stock
Net cash used in financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Cash paid for interest
(20) Subsequent Events
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2015
$
334,644
$
232,668
$
288,565
(181,552)
(216,120)
(134,045)
9,545
12
7,457
170,106
3,000
(4,355)
—
(1,355)
(7,217)
—
4,368
21,984
(2,933)
(1,285)
34,314
1,632
(26,000)
(105,520)
(129,888)
—
144,615
12,455
(116,041)
(113,455)
(7,403)
(126,293)
42,458
163,418
205,876
6,211
$
$
(66,792)
(23,177)
(118,751)
282,169
163,418
4,127
$
$
$
$
(4,931)
49
(2,818)
146,820
4,760
(41,969)
—
(37,209)
—
—
6,711
(115,281)
(229,540)
(338,110)
(228,499)
510,668
282,169
131
The Company evaluated events from the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements on December 31, 2017 through the
issuance of those consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. No events were identified
requiring recognition in and/or disclosure in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
162
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
163
Annual Financial Summary – Unaudited
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Assets
Interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents
Trading securities
Investment securities
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Total investment securities
Available for sale securities
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities
Restricted equity securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Loans
Allowance for loan losses
Loans, net of allowance
Total earning assets
Receivable on unsettled securities sales
Cash and other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and equity
Interest-bearing deposits:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing deposits
Funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
Due on unsettled securities purchases
Other liabilities
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
Tax-equivalent Net Interest Revenue
Tax-equivalent Net Interest Revenue to Earning Assets
Less tax-equivalent adjustment
Net Interest Revenue
Provision for credit losses
Other operating revenue
Other operating expense
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
Net income attributable to BOK Financial Corporation shareholders
Earnings Per Average Common Share Equivalent:
Net income:
Basic
Diluted
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
Average
Balance
Revenue/
Expense
Yield/
Rate
22,128
17,637
11,915
6,877
18,792
175,504
2,564
178,068
16,755
18,490
8,706
709,378
709,378
989,954
28,627
359
24,817
53,803
421
435
68,268
8,123
131,050
1.10%
3.51%
5.35%
2.55%
3.82%
2.12%
5.55%
2.13%
2.81%
5.80%
3.59%
4.13%
4.19%
3.36%
0.28%
0.08%
1.13%
0.42%
0.73%
0.10%
1.15%
5.62%
0.67%
$
2,009,011
521,742
$
222,782
269,207
491,989
8,403,592
49,823
8,453,415
593,744
318,744
245,133
17,176,102
(249,430)
16,926,672
29,560,450
66,922
3,320,122
32,947,494
10,220,068
458,451
2,193,273
12,871,792
58,064
433,791
5,922,588
144,658
19,430,893
9,312,989
153,528
615,217
3,434,867
32,947,494
$
$
$
$
$
858,904
2.69%
2.92%
17,203
841,701
(7,000)
695,094
1,025,517
518,278
182,593
335,685
1,041
334,644
5.11
5.11
$
$
$
Yield calculations are shown on a tax equivalent at the statutory federal and state rates for the periods presented.The yield calculations exclude security trades
that have been recorded on trade date with no corresponding interest income and the unrealized gains and losses. The yield calculation also include average
loan balances for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued and are net of unearned income. Yield/rate calculations are generally based on the
conventions that determine how interest income and expense is accrued.
164
Annual Financial Summary – Unaudited (continued)
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
Average
Balance
Revenue/
Expense
Yield/
Rate
Average
Balance
December 31, 2015
Revenue/
Expense
Yield/
Rate
Assets
Interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents
Trading securities
Investment securities
$
2,038,919
317,808
$
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Total investment securities
Available for sale securities
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities
Restricted equity securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Loans
Allowance for loan losses
Loans, net of allowance
Total earning assets
Receivable on unsettled securities sales
Cash and other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and equity
Interest-bearing deposits:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing deposits
Funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
Due on unsettled securities purchases
Other liabilities
Total equity
$
$
Total liabilities and equity
$
Tax-equivalent Net Interest Revenue
Tax-equivalent Net Interest Revenue to
Earning Assets
Less tax-equivalent adjustment
Net Interest Revenue
Provision for credit losses
Other operating revenue
Other operating expense
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling
interests
Net income attributable to BOK Financial
Corporation shareholders
Earnings Per Average Common Share
Equivalent:
Net income:
Basic
Diluted
10,726
9,213
12,268
7,567
19,835
173,272
3,353
176,625
6,723
17,238
12,658
593,700
593,700
846,718
13,906
386
26,202
40,494
186
248
34,902
6,059
81,889
226,442
334,812
561,254
8,799,716
67,667
8,867,383
323,695
320,975
370,600
16,357,867
(243,631)
16,114,236
28,914,870
114,773
3,248,759
32,278,402
9,744,998
414,103
2,259,242
12,418,343
78,222
589,145
6,019,647
214,842
19,320,199
8,474,230
132,539
1,002,017
3,349,417
32,278,402
$
$
764,829
17,601
747,228
65,000
674,020
1,017,590
338,658
106,377
232,281
(387)
232,668
3.53
3.53
$
$
$
165
0.27%
2.49%
5.48%
1.55%
3.04%
1.97%
4.25%
1.99%
2.26%
5.88%
3.59%
3.58%
3.63%
2.84%
0.09%
0.10%
1.35%
0.34%
0.09%
0.04%
0.33%
1.84%
0.35%
2.49%
2.60%
0.53% $ 2,031,403
149,572
3.43%
$
5.42%
2.26%
3.54%
236,193
386,122
622,315
8,937,418
2.01%
81,469
5.18%
9,018,887
2.03%
426,461
1.93%
230,140
5.37%
3.45%
380,979
3.63% 15,063,002
(200,872)
3.68% 14,862,130
2.95% 27,721,887
80,079
2,772,789
$ 30,574,755
0.14% $ 9,919,913
377,497
0.09%
1.16%
2,587,367
0.33% 12,884,777
69,149
0.24%
766,410
0.04%
4,212,417
0.58%
2.82%
276,662
0.42% 18,209,415
8,048,469
173,743
769,823
3,373,305
$ 30,574,755
2.53%
2.66%
5,580
3,055
12,932
5,971
18,903
172,582
3,341
175,923
9,264
13,532
13,602
539,426
539,426
779,285
$
8,821
383
34,966
44,170
65
282
13,857
5,100
63,474
$
715,811
12,457
703,354
34,000
658,480
896,191
431,643
139,384
292,259
3,694
$
288,565
$
$
4.22
4.21
Quarterly Financial Summary – Unaudited
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Three Months Ended
Average
Balance
December 31, 2017
Revenue/
Expense
Yield/
Rate
Average
Balance
September 30, 2017
Revenue/
Expense
Yield/
Rate
Assets
Interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents
Trading securities
Investment securities
$
1,976,395
560,321
$
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Total investment securities
Available for sale securities
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Total available for sale securities
Fair value option securities
Restricted equity securities
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
Loans
Allowance for loan losses
Loans, net of allowance
Total earning assets
Receivable on unsettled securities sales
Cash and other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and equity
Interest-bearing deposits:
Transaction
Savings
Time
Total interest-bearing deposits
Funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Other borrowings
Subordinated debentures
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
Due on unsettled securities purchases
Other liabilities
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
Tax-equivalent Net Interest Revenue
Tax-equivalent Net Interest Revenue to Earning
Assets
Less tax-equivalent adjustment
Net Interest Revenue
Provision for credit losses
Other operating revenue
Other operating expense
Net income before taxes
Federal and state income taxes
Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
Net income attributable to BOK Financial Corp.
shareholders
Earnings Per Average Common Share Equivalent:
Net income:
Basic
Diluted
6,311
4,629
3,029
1,577
4,606
45,078
545
45,623
5,770
4,956
2,389
185,614
185,614
259,898
8,914
87
6,296
15,297
145
195
21,242
2,025
38,904
228,388
234,481
462,869
8,392,231
43,685
8,435,916
792,647
337,673
257,927
17,181,007
(246,143)
16,934,864
29,758,612
49,219
3,644,284
$ 33,452,115
$ 10,142,744
466,496
2,134,469
12,743,709
63,713
424,617
6,209,903
144,673
19,586,615
9,417,351
218,684
714,075
3,515,390
$ 33,452,115
$
$
220,994
4,131
216,863
(7,000)
166,836
263,987
126,712
54,347
72,365
(127)
72,492
1.11
1.11
$
$
$
1.29%
3.47%
5.31%
2.60%
3.86%
2.16%
5.27%
2.17%
2.97%
5.87%
3.36%
4.31%
4.38%
3.50%
0.32%
0.08%
1.16%
0.45%
0.92%
0.15%
1.29%
5.68%
0.75%
2.75%
3.01%
6,375
4,122
2,942
1,650
4,592
44,579
566
45,145
5,066
4,826
2,095
187,506
187,506
259,727
8,062
90
6,378
14,530
116
140
20,105
2,070
36,961
1.27% $
3.38%
1,965,645
491,613
$
5.31%
2.69%
3.98%
221,609
254,096
475,705
2.19%
8,381,536
5.41%
46,817
2.21%
8,428,353
2.90%
684,571
5.87%
328,677
3.72%
256,343
4.29% 17,256,663
(250,590)
4.35% 17,006,073
3.49% 29,636,980
76,622
3,294,568
$ 33,008,170
0.35% $ 10,088,522
0.07%
464,130
1.17%
2,176,820
0.48% 12,729,472
0.90%
49,774
0.18%
361,512
1.36%
6,162,641
5.55%
144,663
0.79% 19,448,062
9,389,849
145,155
540,463
3,484,641
$ 33,008,170
2.70%
2.97%
$
$
222,766
4,314
218,452
—
175,710
265,934
128,228
42,438
85,790
141
85,649
1.31
1.31
$
$
$
Yield calculations are shown on a tax equivalent at the statutory federal and state rates for the periods presented.The yield calculations exclude security trades
that have been recorded on trade date with no corresponding interest income and the unrealized gains and losses. The yield calculation also include average
loan balances for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued and are net of unearned income. Yield/rate calculations are generally based on the
conventions that determine how interest income and expense is accrued
166
Quarterly Financial Summary – Unaudited (continued)
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
Average Balance
June 30, 2017
Revenue /
Expense
Yield /
Rate
Three Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Revenue /
Expense
Average Balance
December 31, 2016
Yield /
Rate
Average Balance
Revenue /
Expense
Yield /
Rate
1.04% $
3.23%
2,087,964
579,549
$
0.82% $
3.87%
2,032,785
476,498
$
5,198
3,517
2,931
1,757
4,688
42,920
725
43,645
3,539
4,399
2,386
172,139
172,139
239,511
6,437
95
6,090
12,622
96
68
15,188
2,003
29,977
$
2,007,746
456,028
$
219,385
279,987
499,372
8,332,709
51,348
8,384,057
476,102
295,743
245,401
17,129,533
(251,632)
16,877,901
29,242,350
79,248
3,046,973
32,368,571
10,087,640
461,586
2,204,422
12,753,648
63,263
427,353
5,572,031
144,654
18,960,949
9,338,683
157,438
502,068
3,409,433
32,368,571
$
$
$
$
$
209,534
4,330
205,204
—
182,252
250,885
136,571
47,705
88,866
719
88,147
1.35
1.35
$
$
$
221,684
309,252
530,936
8,509,423
57,626
8,567,049
416,524
312,498
220,325
17,135,825
(249,379)
16,886,446
29,601,291
62,641
3,291,057
32,954,989
10,567,475
441,254
2,258,930
13,267,659
55,508
523,561
5,737,955
144,644
19,729,327
9,101,763
91,529
704,978
3,327,392
32,954,989
$
5.34%
2.51%
3.76%
2.09%
6.09%
2.11%
2.92%
5.95%
3.92%
4.03%
4.09%
3.30%
$
0.26% $
0.08%
1.11%
0.40%
0.61%
0.06%
1.09%
5.55%
0.63%
$
2.67%
2.89%
4,244
5,369
3,013
1,893
4,906
42,927
728
43,655
2,380
4,309
1,836
164,119
164,119
230,818
5,214
87
6,053
11,354
64
32
11,733
2,025
25,208
$
205,610
4,428
201,182
—
170,296
244,711
126,767
38,103
88,664
308
88,356
1.35
1.35
$
$
$
167
0.55%
3.91%
5.39%
2.33%
3.60%
1.98%
5.27%
2.00%
0.99%
5.45%
3.31%
3.67%
3.72%
2.98%
0.16%
0.09%
1.12%
0.32%
0.28%
0.02%
0.61%
5.51%
0.44%
2.54%
2.69%
224,376
318,493
542,869
8,706,449
60,106
8,766,555
210,733
334,114
345,066
16,723,588
(246,977)
16,476,611
29,185,231
33,813
3,742,032
32,961,076
9,980,132
421,654
2,177,035
12,578,821
62,004
560,891
6,072,150
144,635
19,418,501
9,124,595
77,575
1,004,212
3,336,193
32,961,076
$
5.44%
2.45%
3.70%
2.02%
5.37%
2.05%
2.27%
5.52%
3.35%
3.88%
3.94%
3.15%
$
0.20% $
0.08%
1.09%
0.35%
0.47%
0.02%
0.83%
5.68%
0.52%
$
2.63%
2.81%
2,800
4,554
3,024
1,854
4,878
42,482
748
43,230
541
4,554
2,835
156,734
156,734
220,126
3,912
91
6,140
10,143
44
34
9,315
2,003
21,539
$
198,587
4,389
194,198
—
143,754
265,547
72,405
22,496
49,909
(117)
50,026
0.76
0.76
$
$
$
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report and pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”), the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness and design of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting information required to be disclosed by the
Company, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
In addition and as of the end of the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), as amended, of the Exchange Act) during the Company's fourth fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appears within Item 8, “Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.” The independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has audited the financial
statements included in Item 8 and has issued an audit report on the Company's internal control over financial reporting, which
appears therein.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information set forth under the headings “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers, “Insider Reporting,” “Director
Nominations,” and “Report of the Audit Committee” in BOK Financial's 2018 Annual Proxy Statement is incorporated herein
by reference.
The Company has a Code of Ethics which is applicable to all Directors, officers and employees of the Company, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting
officer, respectively. A copy of the Code of Ethics will be provided without charge to any person who requests it by writing to
the Company's headquarters at Bank of Oklahoma Tower, P.O. Box 2300, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74192 or telephoning the Chief
Risk Officer at (918) 588-6000. The Company will also make available amendments to or waivers from its Code of Ethics
applicable to Directors or executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, in
accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
There are no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company's board
of directors since the Company's 2017 Annual Proxy Statement to Shareholders.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information set forth under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks
and Insider Participation, “Compensation Committee Report,” “Executive Compensation Tables,” and “Director
Compensation” in BOK Financial's 2018 Annual Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
168
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information set forth under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and
“Election of Directors” in BOK Financial's 2018 Annual Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information regarding related parties is set forth in Note 13 of the Company's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
which appears elsewhere herein. Additionally, the information set forth under the headings “Certain Transactions,” “Director
Independence” and “Related Party Transaction Review and Approval Process” in BOK Financial's 2018 Annual Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information set forth under the heading “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in BOK Financial's 2018 Annual Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The following financial statements of BOK Financial Corporation are filed as part of this Form 10-K in Item 8:
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Annual Financial Summary - Unaudited
Quarterly Financial Summary - Unaudited
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules
The schedules to the Consolidated Financial Statements required by Regulation S-X are not required under the related
instructions or are inapplicable and are therefore omitted.
169
(a) (3) Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
3.0
3.1
3.1(a)
4.0
4.2
4.3
10.0
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.4.2
10.4.2 (a)
10.4.2 (b)
10.4.7
10.4.9
10.4.10
10.6
10.7.7
The Articles of Incorporation of BOK Financial, incorporated by reference to (i) Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of BOK Financial filed with the Oklahoma Secretary of State on May 28, 1991,
filed as Exhibit 3.0 to S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-90450, and (ii) Amendment attached as Exhibit A to
Information Statement and Prospectus Supplement filed November 20, 1991.
Bylaws of BOK Financial, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-
90450.
Bylaws of BOK Financial, as amended and restated as of October 30, 2007, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2007.
The rights of the holders of the Common Stock and Preferred Stock of BOK Financial are set forth in its
Certificate of Incorporation.
Subordinated Notes Indenture, dated as of June 27, 2016, between the Company and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's filing on Form 8-K filed
June 27, 2016).
Form of 5.375% Subordinated Notes due 2056 Global Security (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on June 24, 2016).
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated October 25, 1990, among BOK Financial, Kaiser, and the FDIC,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.0 of S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-90450.
Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement effective March 29, 1991, among BOK Financial, Kaiser, and the
FDIC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-90450.
Letter agreement dated April 12, 1991, among BOK Financial, Kaiser, and the FDIC, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.3 of S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-90450.
Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement effective April 15, 1991, among BOK Financial, Kaiser,
and the FDIC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 of S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-90450.
Employment and Compensation Agreements.
Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Agreement (Amended as of December 1, 2003) between
Steven G. Bradshaw and BOK Financial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.2 of Form 10-
K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.
409A Deferred Compensation Agreement between Steven G. Bradshaw and BOK Financial Corporation dated
December 31, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.2 (a) of Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2005.
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (amended as of June 30, 2013) between BOK Financial and
Steven G. Bradshaw, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.A of Form 8-K filed August 20, 2013.
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (amended June 15, 2013) between BOK Financial and Steven
Nell incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.B of Form 8-K filed September 4, 2013.
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (amended as of June 15, 2013) between BOK Financial and
Norman Bagwell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.A of Form 8-K filed September 4, 2013.
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (amended as of June 15, 2013) between BOK Financial and
Stacy C. Kymes incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.10 of Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2015.
Capitalization and Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 20, 1991, between BOK Financial and Kaiser,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-90450.
BOK Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.0 of S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-62578.
(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:19)
Exhibit
Number
10.7.8
BOK Financial Corporation Directors' Stock Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.0 of S-
8 Registration Statement No. 33-79836.
Description of Exhibit
10.7.9
10.7.10
10.7.11
10.7.12
10.7.13
10.7.14
10.7.16
10.8
10.9
21
23
31.1
31.2
32
99
101
Bank of Oklahoma Thrift Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 1995), incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7.6 of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994.
Trust Agreement for the Bank of Oklahoma Thrift Plan (December 30, 1994), incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7.7 of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994.
BOK Financial Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.0 of S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-106531.
BOK Financial Corporation 2003 Executive Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.0 of S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-106530.
10b5-1 Repurchase Plan between BOK Financial Corporation and BOSC, Inc. dated May 27, 2008,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed May 30, 2008.
BOK Financial Corporation 2003 Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, for the Chief Executive
Officer and for Direct Reports to the Chief Executive Officer, incorporated by reference to the Schedule 14 A
Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 15, 2011.
BOK Financial Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan, Amended and Restated effective April 30, 2013,
incorporated by reference to the Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 20, 2013.
Lease Agreement between One Williams Center Co. and National Bank of Tulsa (predecessor to BOk) dated
June 18, 1974, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-90450.
Lease Agreement between Security Capital Real Estate Fund and BOk dated January 1, 1988, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 of S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-90450.
Subsidiaries of BOK Financial, filed herewith.
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm - Ernst & Young LLP, filed herewith.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
Additional Exhibits.
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, (iv) the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, filed
herewith.
(b)
Exhibits
See Item 15 (a) (3) above.
(c)
Financial Statement Schedules
See Item 15 (a) (2) above.
(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:20)
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BOK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
DATE: February 27, 2018 BY: /s/ George B. Kaiser
George B. Kaiser
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on February 27, 2018,
by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.
OFFICERS
/s/ George B. Kaiser
George B. Kaiser
Chairman of the Board of Directors
/s/ Steven G. Bradshaw
Steven G. Bradshaw
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Steven E. Nell
Steven E. Nell
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
/s/ John C. Morrow
John C. Morrow
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
172
Alan S. Armstrong
C. Frederick Ball, Jr.
/s/ Peter C. Boylan III
Peter C. Boylan III
/s/ Chester E. Cadieux, III
Chester E. Cadieux, III
Jack E. Finley
/s/ Joseph W. Craft, III
Joseph W. Craft, III
DIRECTORS
/s/ Kimberley D. Henry
Kimberley D. Henry
/s/ E. Cary Joullian, IV
E. Carey Joullian, IV
/s/ Robert J. LaFortune
Robert J. LaFortune
Stanley A. Lybarger
/s/ Steven J. Malcolm
Steven J. Malcolm
/s/ Emmet C. Richards
Emmet C. Richards
David F. Griffin
Michael C. Turpen
/s/ V. Burns Hargis
V. Burns Hargis
Douglas D. Hawthorne
R.A. Walker
173
Exhibit 21
BOK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
Banking Subsidiaries
BOKF, National Association (1)
Other subsidiaries of BOK Financial Corporation
BOK Capital Service Corporation
BOKC Real Estate Corporation (6)
BOKF Capital Corporation
BOKF-CC (FSE), LLC
BOKF-CC (Collision Works), LLC
BOKF-CC (Heartland), LLC
BOKF-CC (O2 Concepts), LLC
BOKF Equity, LLC
BOKF Private Equity Limited Partnership
BOKF Private Equity Limited Partnership II
BOK Financial Securities, Inc.
Cavanal Hill Distributors, Inc.
HFP II, LLC
The Milestone Group, Inc. (5)
Subsidiaries of BOKF, National Association (1)
Affiliated BancServices, Inc.
Affiliated Financial Holding Co.
Affiliated Financial Insurance Agency, Inc.
BancOklahoma Agri-Service Corporation
BancOklahoma Mortgage Corporation
BOK Delaware, Inc. (3)
BOK Financial Asset Management, Inc. (2)
BOK Financial Equipment Finance, Inc.
BOK Funding Trust (3)
BOKFCDF Fund I, LLC
BOKF Community Development Fund, LLC
BOKF Community Development Corporation
BOKF Petro Holding, LLC
BOKF Special Assets I, LLC
BOSC Agency, Inc. (Oklahoma)
BOSC Agency, Inc. (New Mexico) (4)
BOSC Agency, Inc.. (Texas) (2)
Calicotte Ranch HOA, LLC
Cavanal Hill Investment Management, Inc.
Cottonwood Valley Ventures, Inc.
CVV Management, Inc.
CVV Partnership, an Oklahoma General Partnership
Oklahoma New Markets Fund I, LLC
Oklahoma New Markets Fund II, LLC
Oklahoma New Markets Fund III, LLC
Oklahoma New Markets Fund IV, LLC
Ottawa Land Partners, LLC (6)
Pacesetter Leasing Company
All Subsidiaries listed above were incorporated in Oklahoma, except as noted.
(1) Chartered by the United States Government
(2) Incorporated in Texas
(3) Incorporated in Delaware
(4) Incorporated in New Mexico
(5) Incorporated in Colorado
(6) Incorporated in Kansas
Exhibit 23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-44121) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the Bank of Oklahoma Master
Thrift Plan and Trust Agreement as amended October 6, 2008.
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-40280) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial Corporation
Master Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees as amended October 6, 2008.
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-79836) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial Corporation
Directors' Stock Compensation Plan.
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-32649) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial Corporation
1997 Stock Option Plan.
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-93957) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial Corporation
2000 Stock Option Plan.
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-62578) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial Corporation
2001 Stock Option Plan.
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-106530) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial
Corporation 2003 Executive Incentive Plan.
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-106531) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial
Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plan.
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-135224) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial
Corporation 2003 Stock Option Plan.
• Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-158846) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial
Corporation 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
• Registration Statement (Form S-3, (No. 333-212120) pertaining to the Reoffer Prospectus of the BOK Financial
Corporation 2016 Subordinated Note Issuance.
of our reports dated February 27, 2018, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of BOK Financial Corporation and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of BOK Financial Corporation included in this Annual Report (10-
K) of BOK Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2017.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
February 27, 2018
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Steven G. Bradshaw, President and Chief Executive Officer of BOK Financial Corporation (“BOK Financial”), certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BOK Financial;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 27, 2018
/s/ Steven G. Bradshaw
Steven G. Bradshaw
President
Chief Executive Officer
BOK Financial Corporation
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Steven E. Nell, Chief Financial Officer of BOK Financial Corporation (“BOK Financial”), certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BOK Financial;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
4. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.
d.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 27, 2018
/s/ Steven E. Nell
Steven E. Nell
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
BOK Financial Corporation
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of BOK Financial Corporation (“BOK Financial”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
Steven G. Bradshaw and Steven E. Nell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of BOK Financial,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of BOK Financial as of, and for, the periods presented.
February 27, 2018
/s/ Steven G. Bradshaw
Steven G. Bradshaw
President
Chief Executive Officer
BOK Financial Corporation
/s/ Steven E. Nell
Steven E. Nell
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
BOK Financial Corporation
RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL BANKING:
WEALTH MANAGEMENT:
TRANSACTION AND
PAYMENT PROCESSING:
MORTGAGE BANKING:
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS:
Bank of Oklahoma Tower
P.O. Box 2300
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74192
918.588.6000
GE-BA-7010