Quarterlytics / Consumer Defensive / Packaged Foods / Bridgford Foods Corporation / FY2004 Annual Report

Bridgford Foods Corporation
Annual Report 2004

BRID · NASDAQ Consumer Defensive
Claim this profile
Ticker BRID
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Consumer Defensive
Industry Packaged Foods
Employees 648
← All annual reports
FY2004 Annual Report · Bridgford Foods Corporation
Loading PDF…
To Our Shareholders

Bridgford  Foods  made  good  progress  during  2004  in
developing  new  products,  improving  our  plants  and
increasing our selling efforts. Unfortunately, we experi-
enced  very  high  commodity  costs  in  2004  which  have
continued into the 2005 fiscal year. The prices for meat
raw materials, especially pork, have reduced our operat-
ing  margins  to  a  break-even  level  overall,  even  with
price  increases  on  all  of  the  branded  products  we  sell.
Fuel,  energy,  health  care,  pension  and  workers’  com-
pensation  costs  all  contributed  to  our  high  expense
level in 2004.

SALES AND EARNINGS
Net  of  promotional  costs,  our  sales  in  2004  were
$137,865,000, an increase of $1,614,000, or 1.2%, over
sales recorded in the previous fiscal year. Increased sales
of  pepperoni  and  sausage  party  bites,  in  addition  to
sales of our new beef jerky shredder products, as shown
on  the  cover  of  this  report,  contributed  to  our  sales
increase.  Shipments  of  Bridgford  Old  South  Buttermilk
Biscuits  are  also  recording  greater  sales  volume.
Sandwich  sales  increased  in  2004  with  our  Ham  &
Cheese  Meal  Kits  showing  the  best  improvement.  Net
income  in  2004  was  $24,000,  a  disappointing  result,
which  was  greatly  affected  by  the  higher  commodity
costs  we  experienced.  Higher  selling  prices  were  not
enough  to  overcome  the  extraordinary  increases  in
these costs.

OPERATIONS
Our new spiral freezer system, put into operation at the
Dallas  Frozen-Rite  plant  during  late  2003,  substantially
improved  efficiency  in  filling  2004  holiday  orders  and
reducing  advance  production  storage  costs.  During
2004,  Superior  Foods  of  Dallas  developed  technology
and  equipment  to  produce  an  exciting  new  product
that will go into retail test markets in March of 2005. The
Statesville,  North  Carolina  bakery  plant  expanded  its
capacity  to  make  specialty  dough  items  for  the  food
service  trade.  Bridgford’s  Chicago  dry  sausage  factory
has established a new major product manufacturing line
scheduled  for  completion  in  the  second  quarter  of
2005, that will substantially increase Chicago plant pro-
duction.  We  have  also  reorganized  our  Anaheim  deli-
catessen foods production operations to improve pro-
ductivity and profit margins.

FINANCIAL MATTERS
Working capital at October 29, 2004 totaled $31,736,000,
$1,461,000 (4.4%) less than at the beginning of the fis-
cal year. The decline resulted from the Company’s pur-
chase  of  274,000  shares  of  common  stock  in  the
amount  of  $2,108,000  ($7.69  average  cost  per  share)
and  capital  expenditures  of  $3,444,000,  partially  offset
by  lower  dividend  payments.  The  working  capital  ratio
declined  slightly  to  3.5  to  1  at  October  29,  2004  com-
pared  to  3.7  to  1  a  year  earlier.  The  Company  has
remained  free  of  interest  bearing  debt  for  eighteen
consecutive years.
Shareholders’ equity totaled $48,664,000, a decrease of
$3,669,000  (7.0%)  compared  to  the  end  of  the  prior
year.  The decrease principally relates to common stock
purchases  noted  previously  and  the  recognition  of  an
increase  in  the  minimum  pension  liability,  which  is
recorded  in  the  Statement  of  Shareholders’  Equity
under  the  “Accumulated  Other  Comprehensive  Loss”
column.  The  increase  in  this  liability  results  from  the
application  of  a  lower  discount  rate  used  to  measure
the  accumulated  pension  benefit  obligation  and  less
favorable investment results in recent years. The Board
of  Directors  suspended  the  quarterly  cash  dividend  at
its May 2004 meeting in recognition of lower profitabil-
ity  levels  in  recent  quarters.  Approximately  130,000
shares remain available for purchase under the 1.5 mil-
lion share repurchase plan previously authorized by the
Board  of  Directors.  Shareholders’  equity  per  share  was
$4.87  at  October  29,  2004  compared  to  $5.09,  a
decrease of 4.3% compared to the prior fiscal year end.

SUMMARY
2004 was a difficult year because of the escalating costs
outlined in this report. We are working hard to reduce
these  expenses  in  2005.  Commodity  prices  remain
extremely  high  at  this  time.  We  believe  that  we  can
improve  sales  and  earnings  during  2005  through  cost
containment and sales emphasis on branded manufac-
tured  products.  We  appreciate  the  dedication  of  our
employees and directors and the support of sharehold-
ers, customers and suppliers.

Respectfully submitted,

January 18, 2005

Allan L. Bridgford 
Chairman

William L. Bridgford
President

 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION  
Washington, D.C. 20549  

FORM 10-K  
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)  
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  

For the fiscal year ended October 29, 2004  

Commission file number: 0-2396  

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION  
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)  

California 
( State of incorporation) 

95-1778176 
(I.R.S. Employer 
Identification No.) 

1308 North Patt Street  
Anaheim, California 92801  
(Address of principal executive offices)  

(714) 526-5533  
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)  

Title of Each Class 
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share 

Name of Exchange on Which Registered 
Nasdaq National Market 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required 
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2)  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained 

herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements 
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:1)  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes (cid:2) No 

(cid:1)  

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on April 16, 2004 was $21,804,000.  

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest 

practicable date:  

9,999,361 shares  
As of January 27, 2005  

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
  
  
  
  
   
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
(This page intentionally left blank.)

INDEX TO FORM 10K  

2 
PART I ................................................................................................................................................................................................

2 
Item 1. Business................................................................................................................................................................ 
6 
Item 2. Properties................................................................................................................................................................ 
Item 3. Legal Proceedings .........................................................................................................................................................
6 
6 
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ................................................................................................

7 
PART II...............................................................................................................................................................................................

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity 

7 
Securities...............................................................................................................................................................................
Item 6. Selected Financial Data .................................................................................................................................................
7 
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ................................ 
8 
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk .....................................................................................
  11 
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .......................................................................................
  11 
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ................................  12 
  12 
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.............................................................................................................................................

PART III .............................................................................................................................................................................................
  14 
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant ................................................................................................  14 
  14 
Item 11. Executive Compensation .............................................................................................................................................
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management ................................................................  14 
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ................................................................................................  14 
  14 
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services......................................................................................................................

PART IV .............................................................................................................................................................................................
  15 
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ...............................................................................................................
  15 
SIGNATURES ................................................................................................................................................................   16 

 1

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Item 1. 

Business  

PART I  

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of 
the  Securities  Act  of  1933  and  Section  21E  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  the  Company  intends  that  such 
forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. These forward-looking statements include, but are 
not  limited  to,  statements  regarding  the  following:  general  economic  and  business  conditions;  the  impact  of  competitive 
product and pricing; success of operating initiatives; development and operating costs; advertising and promotional efforts; 
adverse  publicity;  acceptance  of  new  product  offerings;  consumer  trial  and  frequency;  changes  in  business  strategy  or 
development plans; availability, terms and deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; commodity, labor, and 
employee  benefit  costs;  changes  in,  or  failure  to  comply  with,  government  regulations;  weather  conditions;  construction 
schedules; and other factors referenced in this Report.  

The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and 
uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions regarding the Company’s business, which involve 
judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic and competitive conditions, and future business decisions, all 
of  which  are  difficult  or  impossible  to  predict  accurately  and  many  of  which  are  beyond  the  control  of  the  Company. 
Although  the  Company  believes  that  the  assumptions  underlying  the  forward-looking  statements  are  reasonable,  actual 
results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. In light of the significant uncertainties 
inherent  in  the  forward-looking  information  included  herein,  the  inclusion  of  such  information  should  not  be  regarded  as 
representation  by  the  Company  or  any  other  person  that  the  objectives  or  plans  of  the  Company  will  be  achieved.  The 
forward-looking statements contained herein speak as of the date of this report and the Company undertakes no obligation to 
update such statements after the date hereof.  

Background of Business  

Bridgford  Foods  Corporation,  a  California  corporation  (collectively  with  its  subsidiaries,  the  “Company”)  was 
organized in 1952. The Company originally began its operations in 1932 as a retail meat market in San Diego, California, and 
evolved into a  meat  wholesaler for hotels and restaurants,  a distributor of  frozen  food products, a processor and packer of 
meat and a manufacturer and distributor of frozen food products for sale on a retail and wholesale basis. For more than the 
past  five  years,  the  Company  and  its  subsidiaries  have  been  primarily  engaged  in  the  manufacturing,  marketing  and 
distribution of an extensive line of frozen, refrigerated and snack food products throughout the United States. The Company 
has  not  been  involved  in  any  bankruptcy,  receivership  or  similar  proceedings,  nor  has  it  been  party  to  any  merger, 
acquisition, etc. or acquired or disposed of any material amounts of assets during the past five years. Substantially all of the 
assets of the Company have been acquired in the ordinary course of business. The Company had no significant change in the 
type of products produced or distributed, nor in the markets or methods of distribution since the beginning of the fiscal year.  

Description of Business  

The  Company  operates  in  two  business  segments  –  the  processing  and  distribution  of  frozen  products,  and,  the 
processing  and  distribution  of  refrigerated  and  snack  food  products.  The  products  manufactured  and  distributed  by  the 
Company consist of an extensive line of food products, including biscuits, bread dough items, roll dough items, dry sausage 
products and a variety of sandwiches and sliced luncheon meats. The products purchased by the Company for resale include a 
variety of jerky, cheeses, salads, party dips, Mexican foods, nuts and other delicatessen type food products.  

Products manufactured or processed by the Company .................................................................
Items manufactured or processed by third parties for distribution................................................

69%  
31%  

70%  
30%  

69%
31%

  100%   100%   100%

2004 

2003 

2002 

Although  the  Company  has  recently  introduced  several  new  products,  none  of  these  products  have  contributed 
significantly to the Company’s revenue growth for the fiscal year. The Company’s sales are not subject to material seasonal 
variations. Historically the Company has been able to respond quickly to the receipt of orders and, accordingly, the Company 
does  not  maintain  a  significant  sales  backlog.  The  Company  and  its  industry  generally  have  no  unusual  demands  or 
restrictions  on  working  capital  items.  During  the  last  fiscal  year  the  Company  did  not  enter  into  any  new  markets  or  any 
significant contractual or other material relationships.  

 2

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
The Company has two classes of similar food products, each of which has accounted for 10% or more of consolidated 
sales in the prior three fiscal years listed below. The following table shows sales, as a percentage of consolidated sales, for 
each of these two classes of similar products for each of the last three fiscal years:  

Frozen Food Products ...................................................................................................................
Refrigerated and Snack Food Products.........................................................................................

32%  
68%  

34%  
66%  

35%
65%

  100%   100%   100%

2004 

2003 

2002 

To  date,  federal,  state  and  local  environmental  laws  and  regulations,  including  those  relating  to  the  discharge  of 

materials into the environment, have not had a material effect on the Company’s business.  

Major Product Classes  

Frozen Food Products  

The Company’s frozen food division serves both food service and retail customers. The Company sells approximately 
200  unique  frozen  food  products  through  wholesalers,  cooperatives  and  distributors  to  approximately  17,000  retail  outlets 
and 21,000 restaurants and institutions.  

Frozen Food Products – Food Service Customers  

The food service industry is composed of establishments that serve food outside the home and includes restaurants, the 
food operations of health care providers, schools, hotels, resorts, corporations, and other traditional and non-traditional food 
service  outlets.  Growth  in  this  industry  has  been  driven  by  the  increase  in  away-from-home  meal  preparation,  which  has 
accompanied the expanding number of both dual income and single-parent households. Another trend within the food service 
industry  is  the  growth  in  the  number  of  non-traditional  food  service  outlets  such  as  convenience  stores,  retail  stores  and 
supermarkets.  These  non-traditional  locations  often  lack  extensive  cooking,  storage  or  preparation  facilities,  resulting  in  a 
need  for  pre-cooked  and  prepared  foods  similar  to  those  provided  by  the  Company.  The  expansion  in  the  food  service 
industry  has  also  been  accompanied  by  the  continued  consolidation  and  growth  of  broadline  and  specialty  food  service 
distributors, many of which are long-standing customers of the Company.  

The Company supplies its food service customers generally through distributors that take title to the product and resell 
it. Among the Company’s customers are many of the country’s largest broadline and specialty food service distributors. For 
these and other large end purchasers, the Company’s products occasionally go through extensive qualification procedures and 
its manufacturing capabilities are subjected to thorough review by the end purchasers prior to the Company’s approval as a 
vendor.  Large  end  purchasers  typically  select  suppliers  that  can  consistently  meet  increased  volume  requirements  on  a 
national basis during peak promotional periods. The Company believes that its manufacturing flexibility, national presence 
and  long-standing  customer  relationships  should  pose  barriers  to  entry  for  other  manufacturers  seeking  to  provide  similar 
products to the Company’s current large food service end purchasers, although no assurances can be given.  

Frozen Food Products – Retail Customers  

The majority of the Company’s existing and targeted retail customers are involved in the resale of branded and private 
label packaged foods. The same trends which have contributed to the increase in away-from-home meal preparation have also 
fueled the growth in easy to prepare, microwaveable frozen and refrigerated convenience foods. Among the fastest growing 
segments is the frozen and refrigerated hand-held foods  market. This growth has been driven by improved product quality 
and variety and the increasing need for inexpensive and healthy food items that require minimal preparation. Despite rapid 
growth,  many  categories  of  frozen  and  refrigerated  hand-held  foods  have  achieved  minimal  household  penetration.  The 
Company believes it has been successful in establishing and  maintaining supply relationships  with certain selected leading 
retailers in this market.  

Frozen Food Products – Sales and Marketing  

The Company’s frozen food business covers the United States and Canada. In addition to regional sales managers, the 
Company maintains a network of independent food service and retail brokers covering most of the states as well as Canada. 
Brokers are compensated on  a commission basis. The Company believes that its broker relationships, in close cooperation 
with  the  regional  sales  managers,  are  a  valuable  asset  providing  significant  new  product  and  customer  opportunities.  The 
regional  sales  managers  perform  several  significant  functions  for  the  Company,  including  identifying  and  developing  new 

 3

  
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
business opportunities and providing customer service and support to the Company’s distributors and end purchasers through 
the effective use of the Company’s broker network.  

The  Company’s  annual  advertising  expenditures  are  directed  towards  retail  and  institutional  customers.  These 
customers participate in various special promotional and marketing programs and direct advertising allowances sponsored by 
the  Company.  The  Company  also  invests  in  general  consumer  advertising  in  various  newspapers  and  periodicals.  The 
Company directs advertising at food service customers with campaigns in major industry publications and through Company 
participation in trade shows throughout the United States.  

Refrigerated and Snack Food Products – Customers  

The Company’s refrigerated and snack food products division sells approximately 310 different items through a direct 
store delivery network serving approximately 36,000 supermarkets, mass merchandise and convenience retail stores located 
in 49 states and Canada.  

These customers are comprised of large retail chains and smaller “independent” operators. This part of the Company’s 
business  is  highly  competitive.  Proper  placement  of  the  Company’s  product  lines  is  critical  to  selling  success  since  most 
items could be considered “impulse” items which are often consumed shortly after purchase. The Company’s ability to sell 
successfully to this distribution channel depends on aggressive marketing and maintaining relationships with key buyers.  

Refrigerated and Snack Food Products – Sales and Marketing  

The  Company’s  direct  store  delivery  network  consists  of  two  separate  divisions,  refrigerated  and  non-refrigerated 
snack food products. Refrigerated snack food products are distributed through five different regions located in the southwest, 
primarily  operating  in  California,  Arizona  and  Nevada.  Non-refrigerated  snack  food  products  are  distributed  in  seventeen 
geographic  regions  across  the  United  States  and  Canada,  each  managed  by  regional  sales  managers.  The  regional  sales 
managers  perform  several  significant  functions  for  the  Company  including  identifying  and  developing  new  business 
opportunities  and  providing  customer  service  and  support  to  the  Company’s  customers.  The  Company  also  utilizes  the 
services of brokers where appropriate to support efficient product distribution and customer satisfaction.  

Product Planning and Research and Development  

The  Company  continually  monitors  the  consumer  acceptance  of  each  product  within  its  extensive  product  line. 
Individual  products  are  regularly  added  to  and  deleted  from  the  Company’s  product  line.  The  addition  or  deletion  of  any 
product has not had a material effect on the Company’s operations in the current fiscal year. The Company believes that a 
key factor in the success of its products is its system of carefully targeted research and testing of its products to ensure high 
quality and that each product  matches an identified  market opportunity. The emphasis in  new product introductions  in the 
past  several  years  has  been  in  single  service  items.  The  Company  is  constantly  searching  to  develop  new  products  to 
complement  its  existing  product  line  and  improved  processing  techniques  and  formulas  for  its  existing  product  line.  The 
Company utilizes in-house test kitchens to research and experiment with unique food preparation methods, improve quality 
control and analyze new ingredient mixtures. The Company’s refrigerated and snack food products segment has established a 
new  major manufacturing  line scheduled for completion in the second quarter of  fiscal  year 2005. The Company does not 
anticipate any significant change in product-mix as a result of its current research and development efforts.  

Competition  

The  products  of  the  Company  are  sold  under  highly  competitive  conditions.  All  food  products  can  be  considered 
competitive with other food products, but the Company considers its principal competitors to include national, regional and 
local  producers  and  distributors  of  refrigerated,  frozen  and  snack  food  products.  Several  of  the  Company’s  competitors 
include  large  companies  with  substantially  greater  financial  and  marketing  resources  than  those  of  the  Company.  Existing 
competitors may broaden their product lines and potential competitors may enter or increase their focus on the Company’s 
market, resulting in greater competition for the Company. The Company believes that its products compete favorably with 
those  of  the  Company’s  competitors.  Such  competitors’  products  compete  against  those  of  the  Company  for  retail  shelf 
space, institutional distribution and customer preference.  

Importance of Key Customers  

One customer comprised approximately 14.6% of sales during the 2004 fiscal year.  

 4

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Employees  

The Company has approximately 780 employees, approximately 46% of whose employment relationship is governed 
by  collective  bargaining  agreements.  These  agreements  currently  expire  or  expired  (agreements  covering  19  union 
employees) between March 2004 and March 2007. The Company believes that its relationship with employees is favorable.  

General Risks of Food Industry  

The food industry, and the  markets  within the food industry in  which the Company competes, are subject to various 
risks,  including:  adverse  changes  in  general  economic  conditions,  evolving  consumer  preferences,  nutritional  and  health-
related concerns, federal, state and local food inspection and processing controls, consumer product liability claims, risks of 
product tampering, and the availability and expense of liability insurance. The meat and poultry industries have recently been 
subject to increasing scrutiny due to the association of meat and poultry products with recent outbreaks of illness, and on rare 
occasions  even  death,  caused  by  food  borne  pathogens.  Product  recalls  are  sometimes  required  in  the  food  industries  to 
withdraw contaminated or mislabeled products from the market.  

Risks Relating to Suppliers and Raw Materials  

The Company purchases large quantities of commodity pork, beef and flour. Historically, market prices for products 
processed  by  the  Company  have  fluctuated  in  response  to  a  number  of  factors,  including  changes  in  the  United  States 
government farm support programs, changes in international agricultural and trading policies, weather and other conditions 
during the growing and harvesting seasons.  

Risks Relating to Government Regulation  

The operations of the Company are subject to extensive inspection and regulation by the United States Department of 
Agriculture (the “USDA”), the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) and by other federal, state and local authorities, 
regarding  the  processing,  packaging,  storage,  transportation,  distribution  and  labeling  of  products  that  are  manufactured, 
produced  and  processed  by  the  Company.  The  Company’s  processing  facilities  and  products  are  subject  to  continuous 
inspection by USDA and/or other federal, state and local authorities. On July 25, 1996, the USDA issued strict new policies 
concerning contamination by food borne pathogens such as E. coli, Listeria Monocytogenes and Salmonella, and established 
a  new  system  of  regulation  known  as  the  Hazard  Analysis  Critical  Control  Points  (“HACCP”)  program.  The  HACCP 
program requires all meat and poultry processing plants to develop and implement sanitary operating procedures and other 
program  requirements  on  or  before  January  26,  1998.  The  Company  believes  that  it  is  currently  in  compliance  with  all 
material  governmental  laws  and  regulations  (including  the  January  1998  HACCP  requirements),  and  that  it  maintains  all 
material permits and licenses relating to its operations.  

On October 6, 2003, new USDA regulations regarding the control of Listeria Monocytogenes in Ready-To-Eat Meat 
and Poultry Products took effect. These regulations require environmental and/or finished product testing for harmful bacteria 
that may be present. This testing could result in products being retained, recalled or destroyed if Listeria Monocytogenes is 
detected. The Company believes that it is in full compliance with these regulations.  

Risks Relating to Dependence on Key Management  

The  Company’s  executive  officers  and  certain  other  key  employees  have  been  primarily  responsible  for  the 
development and expansion of the Company’s business, and the loss of the services of one or more of these individuals could 
have  an  adverse  effect  on  the  Company.  The  Company’s  success  will  be  dependent  in  part  upon  its  continued  ability  to 
recruit, motivate and retain qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in this regard. 
The Company has no employment or non-competition agreements with key personnel.  

 5

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Executive Officers of the Registrant  

The  names,  ages  and  positions  of  all  the  executive  officers  of  the  Company  as  of  January  1,  2005  are  listed  below. 
Messrs. Hugh Wm. Bridgford and Allan L. Bridgford are brothers. William L. Bridgford is the son of Hugh Wm. Bridgford 
and the nephew of Allan L. Bridgford. Officers are normally appointed annually by the board of directors at their meeting 
immediately following the annual meeting of shareholders. All executive officers are full-time employees of the Company, 
except for Allan L. Bridgford, who worked 80% of full-time.  

Name 

Age  
Allan L. Bridgford ................................................................
Hugh Wm. Bridgford............................................................
William L. Bridgford ............................................................
Raymond F. Lancy ...............................................................

Position(s) with the Company 

69 Chairman and member of the Executive Committee 
73 Vice President and Chairman of the Executive Committee 
50 President, Secretary and member of the Executive Committee 
51 Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and member of 

Item 2. 

Properties  

The Company owns the following facilities:  

the Executive Committee 

Property Location 

Anaheim, California .......................................................................................................
Modesto, California ........................................................................................................
Dallas, Texas ..................................................................................................................
Dallas, Texas ..................................................................................................................
Dallas, Texas ..................................................................................................................
Dallas, Texas ..................................................................................................................
Statesville, North Carolina..............................................................................................
Chicago, Illinois..............................................................................................................

Building 
Square 
Footage  
100,000 
2,500 
94,000 
30,000 
16,000 
3,200 
42,000 
156,000 

Acreage  
5.0 
0.3 
4.0 
2.0 
1.0 
1.5 
8.0 
1.5 

The foregoing plants are, in general, fully utilized by the Company for processing, warehousing, distributing and 
administrative purposes. The Company also leases warehouse and/or office facilities throughout the United States and 
Canada. The Company believes that its properties are generally adequate to satisfy its foreseeable needs. Additional 
properties may be acquired and/or plants expanded if favorable opportunities and conditions arise.  

Item 3. 

Legal Proceedings  

No material legal proceedings were pending at October 29, 2004 against the Company. The Company is likely to be 
subject to claims arising from time to time in the ordinary course of its business. In certain of such actions, plaintiffs may 
request punitive or other damages that may not be covered by insurance and, accordingly, no assurance can be given with 
respect to the ultimate outcome of any such possible future claims or litigation or their effect on the Company.  

Item 4. 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  

Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

The 2005 annual meeting of shareholders will be held at the Four Points Sheraton, 1500 South Raymond Avenue, 

Fullerton, California at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 16, 2005.  

No matters were submitted by the Company’s shareholders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended October 

29, 2004.  

 6

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
PART II  

Item 5. 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity 
Securities  

Common Stock and Dividend Data  

The common stock of the Company is traded in the national over-the-counter market and is authorized for quotation on 
The Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “BRID”. The following table reflects the high and low closing prices and cash 
dividends paid as quoted by Nasdaq for each of the last eight fiscal quarters.  

Fiscal Year 2003 

High  

Low  

Cash 
Dividends 
Paid  

First Quarter..........................................................................................................................  $  12.30  $  7.50  $ 
Second Quarter .....................................................................................................................  $  11.37  $  6.80  $ 
Third Quarter ........................................................................................................................  $ 
8.50  $  6.45  $ 
Fourth Quarter ......................................................................................................................  $ 
8.34  $  6.85  $ 

0.05 
0.05 
0.03 
0.03 

Fiscal Year 2004 

High  

Low  

Cash 
Dividends 
Paid  

First Quarter..........................................................................................................................  $ 
Second Quarter .....................................................................................................................  $ 
Third Quarter ........................................................................................................................  $ 
Fourth Quarter ......................................................................................................................  $ 

9.50  $  7.39  $ 
8.82  $  7.06  $ 
8.49  $  7.07  $ 
8.89  $  7.52  $ 

0.03 
0.02 
0.00 
0.00 

The payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend 
upon future earnings, financial requirements and other factors. The Company repurchased 274,000 shares of common stock 
in  the  amount  of  $2,108,000 in  fiscal  year  2004  under  the  1.5  million  share  repurchase  plan  previously  authorized  by  the 
Board of Directors.  

Oct. 31 
2003  
$  136,251  

Nov. 1 
2002  
$  139,202  

Nov. 2 
2001(A)  
$  152,464  

36.7%  
1,210  
0.12  
45,686  
12,489  
33,197  

17,735  
75,927  
52,333  
0.16  

36.5%  
1,138  
0.11  
46,413  
11,800  
34,613  

19,030  
77,182  
54,390  
0.26  

Nov. 3 
2000(A)(B)  
$  152,764  
37.4%
8,766  
0.80  
53,100  
14,631  
38,469  

36.5%  
6,244  
0.59  
50,677  
12,652  
38,025  

19,471  
81,238  
57,335  
0.28  

18,964  
82,681  
56,196  
0.28  

Item 6. 

Selected Financial Data  

Oct. 29 
2004  

Net Sales ..........................................................   $  137,865  
Gross Margin Percent ......................................  
Net Income ......................................................  
Basic Earnings Per Share.................................  
Current Assets..................................................  
Current Liabilities ............................................  
Working Capital...............................................  
Property, Plant and 

34.5%  
24  
—    
44,401  
12,665  
31,736  

Equipment, Net ...........................................  
Total Assets .....................................................  
Shareholders’ Equity .......................................  
Cash Dividends Per Share................................  

16,755  
74,942  
48,664  
0.05  

(In thousands, except percent and per share amounts)  

(A) Reclassified to give effect to EITF 01-09.  

(B) 53 weeks  

 7

  
  
  
   
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
Item 7. 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  

Certain statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” 
and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the 
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934.  Such  forward  looking  statements  involve  known  and  unknown  risks,  uncertainties,  and 
other  factors  which  may  cause  the  actual  results,  performance,  or  achievements  of  Bridgford  Foods  Corporation  to  be 
materially  different  from  any  future  results,  performance  or  achievements  expressed  or  implied  by  such  forward  looking 
statements.  Such  factors  include,  among  others,  the  following;  general  economic  and  business  conditions;  the  impact  of 
competitive  products  and  pricing;  success  of  operating  initiatives;  development  and  operating  costs;  advertising  and 
promotional  efforts;  adverse  publicity;  acceptance  of  new  product  offerings;  consumer  trial  and  frequency;  changes  in 
business  strategy  or  development  plans;  availability,  terms  and  deployment  of  capital;  availability  of  qualified  personnel; 
commodity,  labor,  and  employee  benefit  costs;  changes  in,  or  failure  to  comply  with,  government  regulations;  weather 
conditions; construction schedules; and other factors referenced in this report.  

The Company’s operating results are heavily dependent upon the prices paid for raw materials. The marketing of the 
Company’s value-added products does not lend itself to instantaneous changes in selling prices. Changes in selling prices are 
relatively infrequent and do not compare with the volatility of commodity markets. The impact of general price inflation on 
the Company’s financial position and results of operations has not been significant during the last three years.  

Results of Operations (in thousands)  

Fiscal Year Ended October 29, 2004 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2003  

Sales  

Sales  in  fiscal  2004  increased  $1,614  (1.2%)  when  compared  to  the  prior  year.  Sales  in  the  Company’s  frozen  food 
segment declined 3.3%, as a result of lower unit volume partially offset by increased average unit selling prices. Promotional 
spending as a percentage of sales increased to 8.6% compared to 7.2% in the prior year contributing to the sales decline in the 
frozen  food division. Sales in the  Company’s refrigerated  and snack food products segment increased 3.5% primarily as a 
result of higher unit selling prices on level unit volumes.  

Gross Margin  

The  gross  margin  declined  to  34.5%  compared  the  prior  year  at  36.7%.  Increased  meat  ingredient  costs  were  the 
principal  reason  for  this  decline.  When  combining  all  divisions,  net-selling  prices  increased  approximately  5%  on  a  unit 
volume decline of approximately 1.1 % compared to the prior fiscal year.  

Selling, General, and Administrative  

Selling,  general and administrative expenses decreased $48 (0.1%) when compared to the prior  year. Rising payroll, 
workers’ compensation insurance, fuel and finished goods storage costs were offset by a significant reduction in the provision 
for  doubtful  accounts  receivable  and  the  combined  impact  of  aggressive  cost  control  programs  instituted  by  management. 
The Company recorded an asset impairment reserve against the net book value of machinery and equipment of $54 in fiscal 
year 2004 and no asset impairment reserve in the prior year. The effective income tax rate was 38% in 2004, consistent with 
the prior year.  

Gain on Sale of Equity Securities  

The Company sold 14,014 shares of stock received as a result of the bankruptcy of a significant customer on July 26, 

2004. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of $553.  

 Fiscal Year ended October 31, 2003 compared to Fiscal Year Ended November 1, 2002  

Sales  

Sales  in  fiscal  2003  declined  $2,951  (2.1%)  when  compared  to  the  prior  year.  Sales  in  the  Company’s  frozen  food 
segment  declined  6.9%,  as  a  result  of  continued  weak  demand  and  aggressive  competition.  Sales  in  the  Company’s 
refrigerated and snack food products segment increase 0.5% primarily as a result of higher unit volumes.  

 8

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
Gross Margin  

The gross margin remained relatively consistent with the prior year at 36.7%. Increased ingredient costs during the year 
were offset by lower unit overhead due to improved volume on items processed by the Company. Overall, net selling prices 
remained relatively consistent with the prior fiscal year.  

Selling, General, and Administrative  

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $487 (1.1%). A reduction in the provision for doubtful accounts 
receivable  from  fiscal  years  2002  to  2003  contributed  to  this  decrease.  Rising  costs  for  employee  healthcare,  workers’ 
compensation,  property  and  liability  insurance,  transportation  costs,  product  displays  and  pension  expense  mitigated  the 
effect of the reduction in the provision for doubtful accounts receivable. The Company benefited from an effective income 
tax rate of 38% in 2003 compared to 49.9% in 2002. The rate in the prior year was abnormally high due to the revaluation of 
deferred tax assets due to a lower than expected state tax rate.  

Fiscal Year ended November 1, 2002 compared to Fiscal Year Ended November 2, 2001  

Sales  

Sales  in  fiscal  2002  declined  $13,262  (8.7%)  when  compared  to  the  prior  year.  All  segments  of  the  Company’s 
business were adversely affected by the recession. Sales in the Company’s frozen food division declined 7.3%, as a result of 
continued  weak  demand  and  aggressive  competition.  Sales  in  the  Company’s  direct  store  delivery  non-refrigerated  meat 
snack division declined 10.8%, primarily as a result of the weak economy and the bankruptcy of a significant customer. Sales 
in the Company’s direct store delivery Deli division also declined 5.9% due to similar factors already noted above.  

Gross Margin  

The gross margin remained relatively consistent with the prior year at 36.5%. Higher unit costs resulting from lower 
production volumes were offset by more favorable pork commodity prices. Flour prices increased during the year offsetting 
lower pork commodity prices.  

Selling, General, and Administrative  

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2,637 (6.3%) when compared to the prior year. The provision 
for doubtful accounts receivable was increased by $3,750 due to the bankruptcy of a significant customer and collectibility 
issues related to other significant accounts. In addition, the Company expensed approximately $658 in non-recurring costs 
associated  with  the  implementation  of  the  Company’s  new  information  systems  during  the  fiscal  year.  After  considering 
these factors, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 4.3% due to lower sales offset by other factors adversely 
affecting  this  category  including  rising  costs  for  employee  healthcare,  worker’s  compensation,  property  and  liability 
insurance,  transportation  costs  and  pension  expense.  The  Company  expects  to  continue  the  growth  and  modernization  of 
facilities and equipment used in the business. Income before taxes declined 77.5% as a result of the loss of gross margin in 
the  amount  of  $4,834  and  the  significant  factors  noted  above.  The  effective  tax  rate  increased  to  49.9%,  primarily  as  the 
result of the revaluation of deferred tax assets due to a lower than expected state tax rate.  

Liquidity and Capital Resources (in thousands except per share amounts)  

Net  cash  provided  by  operating  activities  was  $908  and  $7,929  in  fiscal  years  2004  and  2003,  respectively.  Gross 
accounts receivable balances decreased $1,346 in 2004 and increased $622 in 2003. The balance in 2004 decreased due to 
lower  overall  sales  levels  in  the  fourth  quarter  and  improved  collection  trends  compared  to  the  prior  year.  The  balance  in 
2003 increased as a result of strong fourth quarter sales compared to the prior year. Inventories increased $4,445 in fiscal year 
2004 due to significant beef ingredient inventories being stored in anticipation of the start up of a new production line in the 
first half of fiscal year 2005 and higher valuations due to commodity cost increases. In fiscal year 2003, inventories increased 
$471 due to higher unit quantities needed to support increased sales activity beginning in the last quarter of the fiscal year. 
Accounts payable decreased $968 in 2004 primarily due to an increase in the rate of processing payments. The balance of 
accounts  payable  is  consistent  with  the  current  business  cycle.  Accrued  payroll,  advertising  and  other  expenses  increased 
$930  in  2004  primarily  as  a  result  of  higher  workers’  compensation  liability  due  to  outstanding  claims  and  the  funding 
pattern of self-insured claims and an increase in accrued property taxes due to significant increases in property valuations. 
The current portion of non-current liabilities decreased $699 and $329 in 2004 and 2003, respectively, due to lower incentive 
compensation accruals as a result of lower profitability levels and slightly lower contribution requirements for the Company’s 
defined  benefits  pension  plan.  Included  in  the  current  portion  of  non-current  liabilities  is  $991  related  to  the  anticipated 
contribution required in fiscal 2005. The minimum pension liability related to the Company’s defined benefit pension plan 
increased to $4,509 at October 29, 2004 compared to $2,780 at October 31, 2003. The increase results from the application of 

 9

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
a  lower  discount  rate  being  applied  to  the  accumulated  pension  benefit  obligation  and  less  favorable  investment  results  in 
recent  years.  The  net  tax  effected  amount  of  this  liability  is  included  in  shareholders’  equity  as  an  “accumulated 
comprehensive loss” in the Statement of Shareholders’ Equity and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).  

The Company’s capital improvement expenditures increased $352 in 2004 and decreased $675 in 2003 compared to the 
prior  year.  Significant  projects  in  process  of  $1,795  at  October  29,  2004  included  equipment  to  expand  processing 
capabilities  at  the  Chicago  facility  ($1,777).  Cash  and  cash  equivalents  decreased  $4,224  in  2004  and  increased  $1,891  in 
2003.  Net  cash  flow  decreased  in  2004  primarily  as  a  result  of  lower  operating  results,  higher  investments  in  ingredient 
inventories  and  increased  capital  spending.  Improved  collections  on  accounts  receivable  and  delayed  funding  of  the 
Company’s  self-insured  workers’  compensation  program  helped  off-set  these  decreases.  Net  cash  flow  improved  in  2003 
primarily as a result of lower income tax payments and collection of amounts refundable.  

Working capital decreased $1,461 in 2004 and $1,416 in 2003. Working capital decreased in 2004 primarily due to the 
repurchase  of  274,000  shares  of  common  stock  in  the  amount  of  $2,108,  and  a  slight  increase  in  capital  expenditures  and 
payments related incentive compensation and employee benefit plans. Off-setting these decreases were lower cash dividend 
payments  compared  to  2003.  Working  capital  decreased  in  2003  primarily  due  to  the  repurchase  of  172,000  shares  of 
common  stock  in  the  aggregate  amount  of  $1,307.  The  Company  has  remained  free  of  interest-bearing  debt  for  eighteen 
consecutive  years.  The  Company  maintains  a  line  of  credit  with  Bank  of  America  that  expires  April  30,  2006.  Under  the 
terms of this line of credit, the Company may borrow up to $2,000 at an interest rate equal to the bank’s reference rate, unless 
the Company elects an optional interest rate. The borrowing agreement contains various covenants, the more significant of 
which  require  the  Company  to  maintain  certain  levels  of  shareholders’  equity  and  working  capital.  The  Company  was  in 
compliance with all provisions of the agreement during the 2004 fiscal year and there were no borrowings under this line of 
credit  during  such  period.  Management  is  of  the  opinion  that  the  Company’s  strong  financial  position  and  its  capital 
resources are sufficient to provide for its operating needs and capital expenditures for fiscal 2005.  

Contractual Obligations (in thousands)  

The Company remained  free of interest bearing long-term  debt for the eighteenth consecutive  year and had no other 
long-term debt or other contractual obligations except  for leases. The Company  leases certain transportation and computer 
equipment under operating leases expiring in 2006. Future minimum lease payments are approximately (in thousands):  

Net Lease Commitments..........................................................................................................  $ 

304  $ 

28 

2005 

2006 

Critical Accounting Policies  

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  requires 
management  to  make  certain  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and 
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses 
during  the  respective  reporting  periods.  Actual  results  could  differ  from  those  estimates.  Amounts  estimated  related  to 
liabilities for self-insured workers’ compensation, employee healthcare and pension benefits are especially subject to inherent 
uncertainties and these estimated liabilities may ultimately settle at amounts not originally estimated. Management believes 
its current estimates are reasonable and based on the best information available at the time.  

The  Company’s  credit  risk  is  diversified  across  a  broad  range  of  customers  and  geographic  regions.  Losses  due  to 
credit  risk  have  historically  been  immaterial  although  losses  in  fiscal  year  2002  were  significant  due  to  a  bankruptcy  of  a 
significant  customer.  The  provision  for  doubtful  accounts  receivable  is  based  on  historical  trends  and  current  collectibility 
risk. The Company has significant amounts receivable with a few large, well known customers which, although historically 
secure,  could  be  subject  to  material  risk  should  these  customers’  operations  suddenly  deteriorate.  The  Company  monitors 
these customers closely to  minimize the risk of loss. One customer comprised 14.6% of revenues in fiscal  years 2004 and 
2003.  

Revenues are recognized upon passage of title to the customer typically upon product pick-up, shipment or delivery to 
customers. Products are delivered to customers primarily through its own long-haul fleet or through a company owned direct 
store delivery system.  

Amounts estimated related to liabilities for pension benefits are especially subject to inherent uncertainties and these 
estimated liabilities may ultimately settle at amounts not originally estimated. Management believes its current estimates are 
reasonable and based on the best information available at the time.  

Deferred taxes are provided for items whose financial and tax bases differ. A valuation allowance is provided against 

deferred tax assets when it is expected that it is more likely than not that the related asset will not be fully realized.  

10

 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
The  Company  assesses  the  recoverability  of  its  long-lived  assets  on  an  annual  basis  or  whenever  adverse  events  or 
changes in circumstances or business climate indicate that expected undiscounted future cash flows related to such long-lived 
assets  may  not  be  sufficient  to  support  the  net  book  value  of  such  assets.  If  undiscounted  cash  flows  are  not  sufficient  to 
support the recorded assets, the Company recognizes an impairment to reduce the carrying value of the applicable long-lived 
assets to their estimated fair value.  

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements  

SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement No. 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”  

In  April  2003,  the  FASB  issued  SFAS  No.  149,  “Amendment  of  Statement  No.  133  on  Derivative  Instruments  and 
Hedging  Activities.” The statement is effective  for contracts entered into or  modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging 
relationships  designated  after  June  30,  2003.  This  statement  amends  and  clarifies  financial  accounting  and  reporting  for 
derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. This 
statement  amends  Statement  133  for  decisions  made  as  part  of  the  Derivatives  Impletion  Group  process  that  effectively 
required  amendments  to  Statement  133,  in  connection  with  other  Board  projects  dealing  with  financial  instruments  and  in 
connection with implementation issues raised in relation to the application of the definition of a derivative. The adoption of 
SAFS 149 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.  

SFAS No. 150, “Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”  

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities 
and Equity.” The statement establishes standards for how a company clarifies and measures certain financial instruments with 
characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that a company classify such instruments as liabilities, whereas they 
previously may have been classified as equity. The standard is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified 
after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective July 1, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 150 did not have a material impact on the 
Company’s financial condition and results of operations.  

FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - an interpretation of ARB No. 51”  

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - an interpretation of ARB No. 
51.”  Fin  46  addresses  consolidation  by  business  enterprises  of  variable  interest  entities,  which  have  one  or  both  of  the 
following characteristics: 1) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without 
additional subordinated financial support from other parties, which is provided through other interests that will absorb some 
or all of the expected losses of the entity, and 2) the equity investors lack an essential characteristic of a controlling financial 
interest. FIN 46 applies to variable interest entities established after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 46 did not have 
a significant impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.  

Item 7A. 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk  

The  Company  did  not  have  significant  overall  currency  exposure  at  October  29,  2004.  The  Company’s  financial 
instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents and life insurance policies at October 29, 2004 and the carrying value of the 
Company’s financial instruments approximated their fair market values based on current market prices and rates. It is not the 
Company’s  policy  to  enter  into  derivative  financial  instruments.  The  Company  does  not  currently  have  any  significant 
foreign  currency  exposure.  The  Company  does  not  engage  in  buying  or  selling  spot  or  futures  commodity  contracts.  The 
Company’s investment portfolio is not subject to significant market risk or interest rate fluctuations.  

Item 8. 

Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  

Unaudited Interim Financial Information (in thousands, except per share amounts)  

2004  

Net sales................................................................................................ $ 
Income (loss) before taxes ....................................................................
Net income (loss) ..................................................................................
Basic earnings (loss) per share.............................................................. $ 

11

January 23  
(12 weeks) 

April 16  
(12 weeks) 

July 9  
(12 weeks) 

35,322   $ 
(222)
(138)
(0.01) $ 

30,541   $ 
(336)
(209)
(0.02) $ 

29,756   $ 
(1,005)
(623)
(0.06) $ 

October 29  
(16 weeks) 
42,246 
1,602 
994 
0.10 

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales................................................................................................ $ 
Income (loss) before taxes ....................................................................
Net income (loss) ..................................................................................
Basic earnings (loss) per share.............................................................. $ 

2003  

January 24  
(12 weeks) 

April 18  
(12 weeks) 

July 11  
(12 weeks) 

32,445   $ 
(246)
(153)
(0.01) $ 

29,074   $ 
174    
108    
0.01   $ 

29,977   $ 
665    
412    
0.04   $ 

October 31  
(16 weeks) 
44,755 
1,358 
843 
0.08 

See Item 15(a) below and the index therein for a listing of the consolidated financial statements and supplementary data 

filed as a part of this report  

Item 9. 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  

the  Audit  Committee  of 

On  December  13,  2004, 

the  Company  dismissed 
PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP  as  the  Company’s  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm.  PricewaterhouseCoopers 
LLP completed the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the  year ended October 29, 2004 on January 27, 2005 
completely terminating PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s appointment as the independent registered public accounting firm for 
the  Company.  The  decision  to  change  principal  accountants  was  approved  by  the  Audit  Committee  and  the  Board  of 
Directors of the Company.  

the  Board  of  Directors  of 

The reports of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on the consolidated financial statements of Bridgford Foods Corporation 
for the years ended October 29, 2004 and October 31, 2003, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor 
were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principle.  

During  the  year  ended  October  29,  2004,  and  through  January  27,  2005,  there  were  no  disagreements  with 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing 
scope  or  procedure,  which  disagreements,  if  not  resolved  to  the  satisfaction  of  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP,  would  have 
caused it to make reference thereto in its reports on the financial statements for such years.  

During the  years ended October 29, 2004, and October 31, 2003, and through January  27, 2005, there have been  no 

reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).  

On December 14, 2004, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Haskell & White 
LLP as its new independent registered public accounting firm as of December 13, 2004 for the fiscal year beginning October 
30, 2004 and ending October 28, 2005.  

During  the  Company’s two  most recent  fiscal  years ended October 29, 2004 and October 31, 2003, and through the 
subsequent interim period ended January 27, 2005, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted Haskell & White 
LLP regarding any of the matters or events set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.  

Item 9A. 

Controls and Procedures  

An evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this annual report was carried out under the supervision and with 
the  participation  of  the  Company’s  management,  including  the  Company’s  Chairman  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  of  the 
effectiveness  of  the  design  and  operation  of  the  Company’s  “disclosure  controls  and  procedures”,  as  such  term  is  defined 
under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d -15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Management is responsible 
for  establishing  and  maintaining  adequate  internal  controls  over  financial  reporting.  Based  upon  that  evaluation,  the 
Company’s  Chairman  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  concluded  that  the  Company’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  were 
effective.  

The  Company’s  management,  including  the  Company’s  Chairman  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  has  evaluated  any 
changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period ended October 
29, 2004, and has concluded that there was no change during the Company’s fourth quarter of its 2004 fiscal year that has 
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  

The  Company  maintains  and  evaluates  a  system  of  internal  accounting  controls,  and  a  program  of  internal  auditing 
designed  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  that  the  Company’s  assets  are  protected  and  that  transactions  are  performed  in 
accordance with proper authorization, and are properly recorded. This system of internal accounting controls is continually 
reviewed  and  modified  in  response  to  evolving  business  conditions  and  operations  and  to  recommendations  made  by  the 
independent auditors and internal auditor. The Company has established a code of conduct and employs an experienced full 
time  internal  auditor.  The  management  of  the  Company  believes  that  the  accounting  and  internal  control  systems  provide 
reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and financial information is reliable.  

12

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
The  Audit  Committee  of  the  Board  of  Directors  meets  regularly  with  the  Company’s  financial  management  and 
counsel,  with  the  Company’s  internal  auditor  and  with  the  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm  engaged  by  the 
Company. Internal accounting controls and the quality of financial reporting are discussed during these meetings. The Audit 
Committee  has  discussed  with  the  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm  matters  required  to  be  discussed  by 
Statement of  Auditing  Standards No. 61 (Communication  with  Audit Committees). In addition, the independent registered 
public  accounting  firm’s  independence  from  the  Company  and  its  management,  including  the  matters  in  the  written 
disclosures  required  by  the  Independence  Standards  Board  Standards  No.  1  (Independence  Discussions  with  Audit 
Committees), has been discussed by the Committee and the independent registered public accounting firm.  

13

 
  
  
Item 10. 

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant  

PART III  

Information  set  forth  in  the  sections  entitled  “Election  of  Directors”  and  “Section  16(a)  Beneficial  Ownership 
Reporting Compliance” contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be 
held on March 16, 2005 is incorporated herein by reference. Information concerning the executive officers of the Company is 
set forth in Part I hereof under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant”.  

The Company adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 during the  first 
quarter of 2004, which applies to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting 
officer  or  controller,  or  persons  performing  similar  functions  and  other  designated  officers  and  employees.  The  Code  of 
Ethics appears on the Company’s website at www.bridgford.com.  

The Company is considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of Rule 4350(c)(5) of the National Association 
of  Securities  Dealers  (NASD)  and  is  therefore  exempted  from  various  NASD  rules  pertaining  to  certain  “independence” 
requirements of its directors. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Andrews, Gilbert, Foster and 
Zippwald are all “independent directors” within the meaning of Rule 4200 of the National Association of Securities Dealers. 
The Audit Committee has been established in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, and each of the members of the 
Audit Committee are independent directors as defined under the NASD’s listing standards. The Board of Directors believes 
that Mr. Andrews qualifies as a “financial expert” as such term is used in the rules and regulations of the SEC.  

Item 11. 

Executive Compensation  

Information  set  forth  in  the  section  entitled  “Compensation  of  Executive  Officers”  contained  in  the  Company’s 
definitive proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 16, 2005 is incorporated herein 
by reference.  

Item 12. 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management  

Information  set  forth  in  the  section  entitled  “Principal  Shareholders  and  Management”  contained  in  the  Company’s 
definitive proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 16, 2005 is incorporated herein 
by reference.  

Equity Compensation Plan Information  

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding options, warrants and rights and shares reserved for 
future issuance under the Company’s existing compensation plans as of October 29, 2004. The Company’s sole shareholder 
approved  equity  compensation  plan  is  the  1999  Stock  Incentive  Plan.  The  Company  does  not  have  any  non-stockholder 
approved equity compensation plans.  

Plan Category 

Equity compensation plans 

approved by security holders 
Equity compensation plans not 
approved by security holders 

Total 

Number of securities to 
be issued upon exercise of 
outstanding options, 
warrants and rights as of 
October 29, 2004 
(a)  

Weighted-average exercise 
price of outstanding 
options, warrants and rights 
(b)  

Number of securities remaining 
available for future issuance under 
equity compensation plans as of 
October 29, 2004 (excluding securities 
reflected in column (a)) 
(c)  

250,000  $ 

—   

250,000  $ 

10.00 

—   

10.00 

650,000 

—   

650,000 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions  

Information set forth in the section entitled “Related Party Transactions” contained in the Company’s definitive proxy 

statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 16, 2005 is incorporated herein by reference.  

Item 14. 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services  

Information  set  forth  in  the  section  entitled  “Proposal  2-  Audit  Fees”  contained  in  the  Company’s  definitive  proxy 

statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 16, 2005 is incorporated herein by reference.  

14

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
Item 15. 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules  

(a)(1) Financial Statements. The following documents are filed as a part of this report:  

PART IV  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ...............................................................................................................  
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 29, 2004 and October 31, 2003......................................................................................  
Consolidated Statements of Income....................................................................................................................................................  
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity and Comprehensive Income.................................................................................  
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows ..............................................................................................................................................  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.......................................................................................................................................  

Page  
17 
18 
19 
19 
20 
21 

(2) Financial Statement Schedule  

The following financial statement is filed herewith.  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule ..........................................................  
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts ..............................................................................................................................  

  32 
  33 

(3) Exhibits  

The exhibits listed under Item 14(c) are filed or incorporated by reference herein.  

(b) The exhibits below are filed or incorporated herein by reference.  

Exhibit 
Number 
  3.5 

  3.6 

  3.7 

10.1 

10.2 

10.3 

10.4 

Exhibit 
Number 
21.1 

23.1 

24.1 

31.1 

31.2 

32.1 

32.2 

Description 

Restated Articles of Incorporation, dated December 29, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 and 
incorporated herein by reference). 

Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated July 27, 1990 (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 and 
incorporated herein by reference). 

By-laws, as amended (filed as Exhibit 2 to Form 10-K on January 28,1993 and incorporated herein by reference). 

Bridgford Foods Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan (filed as Exhibit10.1 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 and 
incorporated herein by reference). 

Bridgford Foods Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-K on January 28, 
1993 and incorporated herein by reference). 

Bridgford Foods Corporation Deferred Compensation Savings Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 
and incorporated herein by reference). 

Bridgford Foods Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and Form of Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 
S-8 on May 28, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). 

Description 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant. 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. 

Power of Attorney (included as part of the signature page) 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer. 

Certification Pursuant to Principal Financial Officer. 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley 
Act of 2002 (Principal Executive Officer). 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley 
Act of 2002 (Principal Financial Officer). 

15

 
  
  
   
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
   
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly 

caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  

SIGNATURES  

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION  
Registrant  

By: 

/s/    ALLAN L. BRIDGFORD         

Allan L. Bridgford 
Chairman 

Date: January 27, 2005  

POWER OF ATTORNEY  

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  this  report  has  been  signed  below  by  the 

following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated  

We, the undersigned directors and officers of Bridgford Foods Corporation do hereby constitute and appoint Allan L. 
Bridgford and Raymond F. Lancy, or either of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, our true and lawful 
attorneys and agents, to do any and all acts and things in our name and behalf in our capacities as directors and officers and to 
execute any and all instruments for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, which said attorneys and agents, or 
either of them, or their substitutes, may deem necessary or advisable to enable said corporation to comply with the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission 
in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including specifically, but without limitation, power and authority to 
sign for us or any of us in our names and in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments; and we do hereby ratify 
and confirm all that the said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.  

Signature 

Title 

Date 

/s/    ALLAN L. BRIDGFORD         
Allan L. Bridgford 

/s/    WILLIAM L. BRIDGFORD         
William L. Bridgford 

/s/    HUGH WM. BRIDGFORD         
Hugh Wm. Bridgford 

/s/    RAYMOND F. LANCY         
Raymond F. Lancy 

/s/    PAUL A. GILBERT         
Paul A. Gilbert 

/s/    RICHARD A. FOSTER         
Richard A. Foster 

/s/    ROBERT E. SCHULZE         
Robert E. Schulze 

/s/    PAUL R. ZIPPWALD         
Paul R. Zippwald 

/s/    TODD C. ANDREWS         
Todd C. Andrews 

Chairman 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

January 27, 2005 

President 

January 27, 2005 

Vice President and Director 

January 27, 2005 

Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer) 

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

Director 

16

January 27, 2005 

January 27, 2005 

January 27, 2005 

January 27, 2005 

January 27, 2005 

January 27, 2005 

 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Bridgford Foods Corporation  

In  our  opinion,  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of  income, 
shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position 
of  Bridgford  Foods  Corporation  and  its  subsidiaries  (the  “Company”)  at  October  29,  2004  and  October  31,  2003,  and  the 
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 29, 2004, in conformity 
with  accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America.  These  financial  statements  are  the 
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based 
on  our  audits.  We  conducted  our  audits  of  these  statements  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  Public  Company 
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable 
assurance about  whether the financial statements are free of  material  misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test 
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used 
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that 
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.  

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  

Orange County, California  

January 27, 2005  

17

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION  
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS  
October 29, 2004, and October 31, 2003  
(in thousands, except per share amounts)  

ASSETS 

Current assets 

Cash and cash equivalents.........................................................................................................   $ 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,118 and $1,429, respectively 
and promotional allowances of $2,368 and $1,847, respectively .........................................  
Inventories.................................................................................................................................  
Prepaid expenses .......................................................................................................................  
Refundable income taxes ..........................................................................................................  
Deferred income taxes...............................................................................................................  
Total current assets .............................................................................................................................  

2004  

2003  

7,972   $  12,196  

11,173    
22,478    
449    
—      
2,329    
44,401    

12,273  
18,033  
216  
732  
2,236  
45,686  

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $47,120 and $43,084, 

17,735  
respectively ....................................................................................................................................  
9,775  
Other non-current assets .....................................................................................................................  
Deferred income taxes ........................................................................................................................  
2,731  
Total assets .........................................................................................................................................   $  74,942   $  75,927  

16,755    
9,890    
3,896    

Current liabilities: 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 

Accounts payable ......................................................................................................................   $ 
Accrued payroll, advertising and other expenses ......................................................................  
Income taxes payable ................................................................................................................  
Current portion of non-current liabilities ..................................................................................  
Total current liabilities.....................................................................................................  
Non-current liabilities .........................................................................................................................  
Contingencies and commitments (Note 6) 
Shareholders’ equity: 
Preferred stock, without par value 

Authorized - 1,000 shares 

Issued and outstanding – none .........................................................................................  

Common stock, $1.00 par value 
Authorized - 20,000 shares 
Issued and outstanding - 10,002 in 2004 and 10,276 in 2003..........................................  
Capital in excess of par value....................................................................................................  
Retained earnings ......................................................................................................................  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ....................................................................................  
Total shareholders’ equity ...............................................................................................  

3,737   $ 
5,847    
913    
2,168    
12,665    
13,613    

4,705  
4,917  
—    
2,867  
12,489  
11,105  

—      

—    

10,059    
14,506    
26,832    
(2,733)
48,664    

10,333  
16,340  
27,321  
(1,661)
52,333  
$  74,942   $  75,927  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.  

18

 
   
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME  
For the years ended October 29, 2004, October 31, 2003, and November 1, 2002  
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)  

2004  

2003  

2002  

Net sales ..................................................................................................................  $ 

137,865   $ 

136,251  $ 

139,202 

Cost of products sold, excluding depreciation ......................................................... 
Selling, general and administrative expenses........................................................... 
Depreciation ............................................................................................................ 
Gain on sale of equity securities .............................................................................. 

90,306  
43,728  
4,345  
(553)

86,211 
43,776 
4,313 
—   

88,460 
44,263 
4,208 
—   

Income before taxes................................................................................................. 
Provision for taxes on income ................................................................................. 

Net income...............................................................................................................  $ 

Basic earnings per share ..........................................................................................  $ 

137,826  

134,300 

136,931 

39  
15  

24   $ 

 —     $ 

1,951 
741 

1,210  $ 

0.12  $ 

2,271 
1,133 

1,138 

0.11 

Shares used to compute basic earnings per share..................................................... 

10,131,570  

10,381,477 

10,448,271 

Diluted earnings per share .......................................................................................  $ 

 —     $ 

0.12  $ 

0.11 

Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share.................................................. 

10,131,570  

10,381,477 

10,488,683 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME  
For the years ended October 29, 2004, October 31, 2003, and November 1, 2002  
(in thousands, except per share amounts)  

Balance, November 2, 2001......................... 
Cash dividends paid ($.26 per share)  
Net income ........................................ 

Other comprehensive (loss): 

Minimum pension liability ................ 

Comprehensive loss ..................................... 

Balance, November 1, 2002......................... 
Shares repurchased and retired.......... 
Cash dividends paid ($.16 per share)  
Net income ........................................ 

Other comprehensive (loss): 

Minimum pension liability ................ 

Comprehensive income ............................... 

Balance, October 31, 2003........................... 
Shares repurchased and retired.......... 
Cash dividends paid ($.05 per share)  
Net income ........................................ 

Other comprehensive income (loss): 

Unrealized gain on investment .......... 
Minimum pension liability ................ 

Comprehensive loss ..................................... 

Shares  
10,448   $ 

Amount  

Capital in 
excess of 
par value 

10,505   $ 

17,475   $ 

10,448  
(172)

10,505  
(172)

17,475  
(1,135)

Retained 
earnings  
29,355  
(2,717)
1,138  

27,776  

(1,665)
1,210  

Accumulated 
other 
comprehensive 
income (loss)  

Total 
shareholders’ 
equity  

$ 

$ 

(1,366)

(1,366)

(295)

10,276  
(274)

10,333  
(274)

16,340  
(1,834)

27,321  

(1,661)

(513)
24  

25  
(1,097)

57,335  
(2,717)
1,138  

(1,366)

(228)

54,390  
(1,307)
(1,665)
1,210  

(295)

915  

52,333  
(2,108)
(513)
24  

25  
(1,097)

(1,048)

48,664  

Balance, October 29, 2004........................... 

10,002   $ 

10,059   $ 

14,506   $ 

26,832   $ 

(2,733) $ 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.  

19

 
   
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS  
For the years ended October 29, 2004, October 31, 2003, and November 1, 2002  
(in thousands)  

Cash flows from operating activities: 

Net income ............................................................................................................   $ 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 

Depreciation ..........................................................................................................    
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable ...........................................................    
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and equipment............................................    
(Gain) on sale of equity securities .........................................................................    
Provision for asset impairment..............................................................................    
Deferred income taxes, net....................................................................................    

Changes in operating assets and liabilities: 

Accounts receivable ..............................................................................................    
Inventories.............................................................................................................    
Prepaid expenses ...................................................................................................    
Income taxes receivable ........................................................................................    
Other non-current assets........................................................................................    
Accounts payable ..................................................................................................    
Accrued payroll, advertising and other expenses ..................................................    
Income taxes payable ............................................................................................    
Current portion of non-current liabilities ..............................................................    
Non-current liabilities ...........................................................................................    
Net cash provided by operating activities ....................................................    

Cash used in investing activities: 

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment ...........................................    
Proceeds from sale of equity securities .................................................................    
Additions to property, plant and equipment ..........................................................    
Net cash used in investing activities ............................................................    

Cash used in financing activities: 

Shares repurchased ......................................................................................    
Cash dividends paid.....................................................................................    
Cash used in financing activities ........................................................    
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents .....................................................    

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year .............................................................    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year........................................................................   $ 
Cash paid for income taxes .............................................................................................   $ 

2004  

2003  

2002  

24   $ 

1,210   $ 

1,138  

4,345    
(246)
(11)
(553)

54    

(601)

1,346    
(4,445)
(619)
732    
(74)
(968)
930    
913    
(699)
780    
908    

35    
898    

(3,444)

(2,511)

(2,108)
(513)

(2,621)

(4,224)

4,313    
915    
48    
—      
—      
1,970    

(622)
(471)

28    
1,005    
(1,075)

749    
269    
—      
(329)
(81)
7,929    

26    
—      

(3,092)

(3,066)

(1,307)
(1,665)

(2,972)
1,891    

4,208  
3,750  
(3)
—    
—    
(1,548)

(3,134)
1,603  
620  
304  
570  
(1,766)
(552)
—    
1,466  
(2,844)
3,812  

3  
—    
(3,767)

(3,764)

—    
(2,717)

(2,717)

(2,669)

12,196    
12,974  
10,305    
7,972   $  12,196   $  10,305  
1,789  

39   $ 

3   $ 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.  

20

 
   
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)  

NOTE 1- The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:  

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly 

owned. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.  

Use of estimates and assumptions  

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  requires 
management  to  make  certain  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and 
disclosure  of  contingent  assets  and  liabilities  at  the  date  of  the  financial  statements,  as  well  as  the  reported  revenues  and 
expenses during the respective reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Amounts estimated related 
to  liabilities  for  self-insured  workers’  compensation,  employee  healthcare  and  pension  benefits  are  especially  subject  to 
inherent uncertainties and these estimated liabilities may ultimately settle at amounts not originally estimated. Management 
believes its current estimates are reasonable and based on the best information available at the time.  

Concentrations of credit risk  

The  Company’s  credit  risk  is  diversified  across  a  broad  range  of  customers  and  geographic  regions.  Losses  due  to 
credit  risk  have  historically  been  immaterial,  although  losses  in  fiscal  year  2002  were  significant.  The  carrying  amount  of 
cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair market value due 
to the short  maturity of these instruments. The provision for doubtful accounts receivable is based on historical trends and 
current collectibility risk. The Company has significant amounts receivable with a few large, well known customers which, 
although historically secure, could be subject to material risk should these customers’ operations suddenly deteriorate. The 
Company monitors these customers closely to minimize the risk of loss. One customer in the Company’s Refrigerated and 
Snack Food Products segment comprised 14.6% of revenues in fiscal year 2004.  

Business segments  

The Company and its subsidiaries operate in two business segments - the processing and distribution of frozen foods, 

and the processing and distribution of refrigerated and snack food products.  

Fiscal year  

The Company maintains its accounting records on a 52-53 week fiscal basis. Fiscal years 2002, 2003 and 2004 include 

52 weeks each.  

Revenues  

Revenues are recognized upon passage of title to the customer typically upon product pick-up, shipment or delivery to 
customers.  Products  are  primarily  delivered  to  customers  through  the  Company’s  own  fleet  or  through  a  Company  owned 
direct store delivery system. These costs, $6,514, $6,877 and $6,755 for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, are included in 
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements. The Company records promotional and returns 
allowances based on recent and historical trends.  

Cash equivalents  

The Company considers all investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash 

equivalents include treasury bills of $7,215 at October 29, 2004 and $10,193 at October 31, 2003.  

21

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Inventories  

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.  

Property, plant and equipment  

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Major renewals and betterments are 
charged to the asset accounts while the cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred. When assets are 
sold  or  otherwise  disposed  of,  the  cost  and  accumulated  depreciation  are  removed  from  the  respective  accounts  and  the 
resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to income. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis over 10 to 20 years 
for buildings and improvements, 5 to 10 years for machinery and equipment and 3 to 5 years for transportation equipment.  

The  Company  assesses  the  recoverability  of  its  long-lived  assets  on  an  annual  basis  or  whenever  adverse  events  or 
changes in circumstances or business climate indicate that expected undiscounted future cash flows related to such long-lived 
assets  may  not  be  sufficient  to  support  the  net  book  value  of  such  assets.  If  undiscounted  cash  flows  are  not  sufficient  to 
support the recorded assets, the Company recognizes an impairment to reduce the carrying value of the applicable long-lived 
assets  to  their  estimated  fair  value.  The  Company  recorded  an  asset  impairment  reserve  against  the  net  book  value  of 
machinery and equipment of $54 in fiscal year 2004. This specialized machinery and equipment is related to the Refrigerated 
and Snack Food segment and cannot be used by another segment. As a result, the asset was written off in cost of sales related 
to the Refrigerated and Snack Food segment.  

Income taxes  

Deferred taxes are provided for items whose financial and tax bases differ. A valuation allowance is provided against 

deferred tax assets when it is expected that it is more likely than not that the related asset will not be fully realized.  

Stock-based compensation  

Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  (SFAS  No.  123),  “Accounting  for  Stock-Based  Compensation,” 
encourages,  but  does  not  require,  companies  to  record  compensation  cost  for  stock-based  employee  compensation  plans 
based on the fair market value of options granted. The Company has chosen to account for stock based compensation using 
the  intrinsic  value  method  prescribed  in  Accounting  Principles  Board  Opinion  No.  25,  “Accounting  for  Stock  Issued  to 
Employees,” and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the 
fair market value of the Company’s stock price at the date of grant as determined by the Board of Directors over the amount 
an employee must pay to acquire the stock. No grants, exercises, forfeitures or expirations have occurred during fiscal years 
2004, 2003 and 2002.  

The following balances are reflected as of November 1, 2002:  

Options Outstanding 
Exercise price 
$ 

Shares  
10  250,000  6.5 

Weighted average  
Remaining life (years) 

Options Exercisable 
Weighted average  
exercise price 
10 
$ 

Shares 
187,500  $ 

10 

Weighted average exercise price 

The following balances are reflected as of October 31, 2003:  
Options Exercisable 
Options Outstanding 
Weighted average 
exercise price 
Exercise price 
10 
$ 
$ 

Weighted average 
remaining life (years) 

10  250,000  5.5 

Shares 

The following balances are reflected as of October 29, 2004:  

Options Outstanding 
Exercise price 
$ 

Shares 

10  250,000  4.5 

Weighted average 
remaining life (years) 

Options Exercisable 
Weighted average 
exercise price 
10 
$ 

Shares 
250,000  $ 

Weighted average exercise price 

Shares 
250,000  $ 

Weighted average exercise price 

10 

10 

The  Company  adopted  the  disclosure  requirements  of  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.  123  (“FAS 
123”). As permitted by FAS 123, the Company measures compensation cost in accordance with APB 25. Had compensation 
cost for the Company’s Stock Option Plan been determined based on the fair value of the options consistent with FAS 123, 
the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:  

22

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
October 29, 
2004 

For the year ended 
October 31, 
2003 

Net income as reported ...............................................................................   $ 
Deduct: Pro forma compensation expense, net of tax.................................    
Pro forma net income..................................................................................   $ 
Basic and diluted earnings per share as reported ........................................   $ 
Pro forma basic and diluted earning per share ............................................   $ 
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic...............................................    
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted ............................................    

24  $ 

—   

24  $ 

 —    $ 
 —    $ 

1,210  $ 
74 

1,136  $ 

0.12  $ 
0.11  $ 

10,131,570 
10,131,570 

10,381,477 
10,381,477 

November 1, 
2002 

1,138 
147 

991 

0.11 
0.09 
10,448,271 
10,488,683 

The fair value of compensatory  stock options  was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing  model using the 

following weighted average assumptions at the date of issuance:  

Risk-free interest rate...................................................................................................  
Expected years until exercise.......................................................................................  
Expected stock volatility..............................................................................................  
Expected dividends ......................................................................................................  

5.34% 
6.0 years 
40.00% 
2.20% 

Basic and diluted earnings per share  

Basic  earnings  per  share  is  calculated  based  on  the  weighted  average  number  of  shares  outstanding  for  all  periods 
presented. Diluted earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus shares 
issuable on conversion or exercise of all potentially dilutive securities (stock options).  

Foreign currency transactions  

The  Company’s  foreign  subsidiary  located  in  Canada  enters  into  transactions  that  are  denominated  in  a  foreign 
currency. The related transaction gains and losses arising from changes in exchange rates are not material and are included in 
selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income in the period the transaction occurred.  

Comprehensive income (loss)  

Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business enterprise during the period from 
transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income consists of net income, the 
additional minimum pension liability adjustment and unrealized gains on equity securities. The Company’s cost basis in the 
stock  is  equal  to  the  fair  market  value  at  the  date  of  issuance.  During  fiscal  years  2004,  2003,  and  2002  the  Company 
recognized  a  minimum  pension  liability  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  SFAS  No.  87  “Employers’  Accounting  for 
Pensions”. The impact of this transaction has been recorded as a component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. No effect has 
been given to this transaction in the statement of cash flows. During fiscal year 2004, comprehensive income, net of tax, of 
$25 was recorded for an unrealized gain on investment. During fiscal year 2004, comprehensive loss, net of tax, of $1,097 
was recorded for the minimum pension liability.  

23

 
   
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Critical accounting policies  

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  requires 
management  to  make  certain  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and 
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses 
during  the  respective  reporting  periods.  Actual  results  could  differ  from  those  estimates.  Amounts  estimated  related  to 
liabilities for self-insured workers’ compensation, employee healthcare and pension benefits are especially subject to inherent 
uncertainties and these estimated liabilities may ultimately settle at amounts not originally estimated. Management believes 
its current estimates are reasonable and based on the best information available at the time.  

The  Company’s  credit  risk  is  diversified  across  a  broad  range  of  customers  and  geographic  regions.  Losses  due  to 
credit risk have historically been immaterial although losses in fiscal year 2002 were significant. The provision for doubtful 
accounts  receivable  is  based  on  historical  trends  and  current  collectibility  risk.  The  Company  has  significant  amounts 
receivable  with  a  few  large,  well  known  customers  which,  although  historically  secure,  could  be  subject  to  material  risk 
should these customers’ operations suddenly deteriorate. The Company monitors these customers closely to minimize the risk 
of loss. One customer comprised 14.6% of revenues in fiscal year 2004.  

Revenues  are  recognized  upon  passage  of  title  to  the  customer  typically  upon  product  shipment  or  delivery  to 
customers.  Products  are  delivered  to  customers  primarily  through  its  own  fleet  or  through  a  company  owned  direct  store 
delivery system.  

24

 
  
  
  
  
NOTE 2- Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions:  

Inventories: 
Meat, ingredients and supplies..................................................................................   $ 
Work in process ........................................................................................................    
Finished goods ..........................................................................................................    
$ 

Property, plant and equipment: 
Land ..........................................................................................................................   $ 
Buildings and improvements ....................................................................................    
Machinery and equipment ........................................................................................    
Asset impairment reserve..........................................................................................    
Transportation equipment .........................................................................................    
Construction in process.............................................................................................    

Accumulated depreciation ........................................................................................    
$ 

Other non-current assets: 
Cash surrender value benefits ...................................................................................   $ 
Intangible asset .........................................................................................................    
Others........................................................................................................................    
$ 

Accrued payroll, advertising and other expenses: 
Payroll, vacation, payroll taxes and employee benefits ............................................   $ 
Accrued advertising and broker commissions ..........................................................    
Property taxes ...........................................................................................................    
Others........................................................................................................................    
$ 

Current portion of non-current liabilities: 
Incentive compensation ............................................................................................   $ 
Accrued pension .......................................................................................................    
Other accrued retirement plans .................................................................................    
Others........................................................................................................................    
$ 

Non-current liabilities: 
Incentive compensation ............................................................................................   $ 
Accrued pension .......................................................................................................    
Other accrued retirement plans .................................................................................    
Post retirement healthcare.........................................................................................    
$ 

2004  

2003  

7,232   $ 
1,902    
13,344    
22,478   $ 

1,840   $ 
13,128    
36,890    
(54)
10,276    
1,795    
63,875    
(47,120)
16,755   $ 

3,229  
1,850  
12,954  
18,033  

1,840  
13,065  
35,324  
—    
9,744  
846  
60,819  
(43,084)
17,735  

9,772   $ 
118    
—      
9,890   $ 

4,164   $ 
635    
500    
548    
5,847   $ 

696   $ 
991    
475    
6    
2,168   $ 

9,316  
159  
300  
9,775  

3,225  
673  
382  
637  
4,917  

1,212  
1,136  
516  
3  
2,867  

711   $ 
8,346    
4,246    
310    
13,613   $ 

1,256  
5,203  
4,326  
320  
11,105  

25

 
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
NOTE 3- Retirement and Other Benefit Plans:  

The Company has noncontributory-trusteed defined benefit retirement plans for sales, administrative, supervisory and 
certain other employees. The benefits under these plans are primarily based on years of service and compensation levels. The 
Company’s  funding  policy  is  to  contribute  annually  the  maximum  amount  deductible  for  federal  income  tax  purposes, 
without regard to the plans’ unfunded current liability. The measurement date for the plan is the Company’s fiscal year end.  

Net pension cost consisted of the following:  

2004 

2003 

2002 

Service cost........................................................................................................................ $  1,435   $  1,177   $  1,055  
1,312  
Interest cost........................................................................................................................
(1,159)
Expected return on plan assets...........................................................................................
8  
Amortization of unrecognized (gain) loss..........................................................................
(76)
Amortization of transition asset (15.2 years) .....................................................................
41  
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs .............................................................
Net pension cost................................................................................................................. $  2,117   $  1,783   $  1,181  

226    
(76)
41    

300    
(68)
41    

1,523    
(1,108)

1,704    
(1,295)

Net  pension  cost  is  determined  using  assumptions  as  of  the  beginning  of  each  fiscal  year.  Weighted  average 
assumptions for the fiscal years are as follows:  

Discount rate.................................................................................................................................... 6.25%   6.75%   7.00%
Rate of increase in salary levels....................................................................................................... 3.75%   3.75%   4.00%
Expected return on plan assets......................................................................................................... 8.00%   8.00%   8.00%

The 1987 transition asset was fully amortized using the straight-line method over the average remaining service period 

of active plan participants at October 29, 2004.  

The benefit obligation, plan assets, and funded status of these plans as of the fiscal years ended are as follows:  

2004 

2003 

2002 

Change in benefit obligations: 

Benefit Obligations - beginning of year ................................................................
Service Cost ..........................................................................................................
Interest Cost ..........................................................................................................
Actuarial Loss .......................................................................................................
Benefits Paid .........................................................................................................

Benefit Obligations - end of year ..........................................................................

Change in plan assets: 

Fair value of plan assets - beginning of year .........................................................
Employer Contributions ........................................................................................
Actual return on plan assets ..................................................................................
Benefits Paid .........................................................................................................

Fair value of plan assets - end of year ...................................................................

Funded Status of the plans ..............................................................................................
Unrecognized prior service costs ....................................................................................
Unrecognized net actuarial loss ......................................................................................
Unrecognized net transition asset ...................................................................................
Additional accrued minimum liability ............................................................................

Accrued pension cost ......................................................................................................

2004 

2003 

27,489    
1,434    
1,705    
2,971    
(448)
33,151    

16,296    
848    
1,025    
(448)
17,721    
(15,430)

118    
10,484    
—      

(4,509)

(9,337)

22,025  
1,177  
1,523  
3,135  
(370)
27,490  

13,898  
1,000  
1,768  
(370)
16,296  
(11,194)
159  
7,544  
(68)
(2,780)

(6,339)

The accumulated benefit obligation is $27,058 and $22,635 at October 29, 2004 and October 31, 2003, respectively.  

26

 
  
  
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
The  benefit  obligation  is  determined  using  assumptions  as  of  the  end  of  each  fiscal  year.  Weighted  average 

assumptions as of the fiscal years ended are as follows:  

Discount rate.........................................................................................................................
Rate of increase in salary levels............................................................................................

2004 
5.75%  
3.75%  

2003 
6.25%
3.75%

Adverse  investment  results  have  been  experienced  in  recent  years.  In  addition,  the  discount  rate  used  to  value  the 
projected benefit obligation was lowered to 5.75% compared to 6.25% in the prior fiscal year. These factors resulted in an 
additional  minimum  liability  that  has  been  recorded  as  a  reduction  of  shareholders’  equity  in  the  accompanying  balance 
sheet.  

Plan  assets  are  primarily  invested  in  marketable  equity  securities,  corporate  and  government  debt  securities  and  are 
administered  by  an  investment  management  company.  The  plans’  long-term  return  on  assets  is  based  on  the  weighted-
average of the plans’ investment allocation as of the measurement date and the published historical returns for those types 
asset  categories,  taking  into  consideration  inflation  rate  forecasts.  The  compensation  increase  assumption  is  based  upon 
historical patterns of salary increases and management’s expectation of future salary increases for plan participants.  

The actual allocations as of the fiscal years ended and target allocation for plan assets are as follows:  

Asset Class 

Large Cap Equities ............................................................................................................  
Mid Cap Equities ...............................................................................................................  
Small Cap Equities ............................................................................................................  
Aetna General Account......................................................................................................  
Fixed Income .....................................................................................................................  
Cash ...................................................................................................................................  

2004 
63.8%  
0.0%  
0.0%  
0.0%  
29.9%  
6.3%  

2003 
64.6%  
0.0%  
0.0%  
0.0%  
33.1%  
2.3%  

Target 
Asset 
Allocation 

55.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
30.0%
0.0%

Total...................................................................................................................................   100.0%   100.0%  

100.0%

Expected payments for the pension benefits are as follows:  

Pension 
Benefits 

Other 
Postretirement 
Benefits 

Fiscal 2005................................................................................................................ $ 
Fiscal 2006................................................................................................................ $ 
Fiscal 2007................................................................................................................ $ 
Fiscal 2008................................................................................................................ $ 
Fiscal 2009................................................................................................................ $ 
Fiscal 2010-2014 ...................................................................................................... $ 

690  $ 
774  $ 
815  $ 
861  $ 
1,047  $ 
7,048  $ 

475 
512 
512 
512 
512 
12,183 

Expected Company contributions for fiscal year 2005 are $690.  

Net amounts recognized as of the end of each fiscal year are as follows:  

Accrued benefit cost ....................................................................................................... $ 
Intangible asset ...............................................................................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive income ....................................................................

$ 

2004 
(9,337) $ 
118    
4,390    
(4,829) $ 

2003 
(6,339)
91  
2,689  
(3,559)

In  fiscal  year  1991,  the  Company  adopted  a  non-qualified  supplemental  retirement  plan  for  certain  key  employees. 
Benefits provided under the plan are equal to 60% of the employee’s final average earnings, less amounts provided by the 
Company’s  defined  benefit  pension  plan  and  amounts  available  through  Social  Security.  Effective  January  1,  1991  the 
Company  adopted  a  deferred  compensation  savings  plan  for  certain  key  employees.  Under  this  arrangement,  selected 
employees  contribute  a  portion  of  their  annual  compensation  to  the  plan.  The  Company  contributes  an  amount  to  each 
participant’s  account  by  computing  an  investment  return  equal  to  Moody’s  Average  Seasoned  Bond  Rate  plus  2%. 
Employees receive vested amounts upon death, termination or attainment of retirement age. Total benefit expense recorded 

27

 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
under these plans for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $0, $71, and $377, respectively. Benefits payable related to these 
plans  and  included  in  other  non-current  liabilities  in  the  accompanying  financial  statements  were  $4,246  and  $4,326  at 
October 29, 2004 and October 31, 2003, respectively. In connection with this arrangement the Company is the beneficiary of 
life insurance policies on the lives of certain key employees. The aggregate cash surrender value of these policies, included in 
non-current assets, was $9,772 and $9,316 at October 29, 2004 and October 31, 2003, respectively.  

The Company provides an incentive compensation plan for certain key executives, which is based upon the Company’s 
pretax  income  and  return  on  shareholders’  equity.  The  payment  of  these  amounts  is  generally  deferred  over  a  five-year 
period. The total amount payable related to this arrangement  was $1,407 and $2,468 at October 29, 2004 and October 31, 
2003, respectively. Future payments are approximately $696, $395, $165, $121 and $30 for fiscal years 2005 through 2008, 
respectively.  

Postretirement health care benefits in the approximate amount of $310 and $320 are included in non-current liabilities 

at October 29, 2004 and October 31, 2003, respectively.  

The Company’s 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (“the Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors on January 11, 1999 
and 275,000 options were granted on April 29, 1999. During fiscal year 2000, 25,000 options were canceled Under the Plan, 
the maximum aggregate number of shares  which may be optioned and sold is 900,000 shares of common stock, subject to 
adjustment upon changes in capitalization or merger. Generally, options granted under the plan vest in annual installments 
over four  years  following the date of grant (as determined by the Board of Directors) subject to the optionee’s continuous 
service. Options expire ten years from the date of grant with the exception of an incentive stock option granted to an optionee 
who owns stock representing more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company, in which case the 
term of the option is five years. Options generally terminate three months after termination of employment or one year after 
termination  due  to  permanent  disability  or  death.  Options  are  generally  granted  at  a  fair  market  value  determined  by  the 
Board of Directors subject to the following:  

a.)  With  respect  to  options  granted  to  an  employee  or  service  provider  who,  at  the  time  of  grant  owns  stock 
representing more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company; the per share exercise 
price shall be no less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant.  

b.)  With  respect  to  options  granted  to  an  employee  or  service  provider  other  than  described  in  the  preceding 
paragraph, the exercise price shall be no less than 100% for incentive stock options and 85% for non-statutory 
stock options of the fair market value on the date of grant.  

No options have been granted, exercised, canceled or forfeited for the last three fiscal years.  

As of October 29, 2004, 250,000 options were outstanding at an exercise price of $10.00 per share.  

28

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
NOTE 4- Income Taxes:  

The provision for taxes on income includes the following:  

2004  

2003  

2002  

Current: 

Federal.........................................................................................................................$  1,174   $ 
99    
State............................................................................................................................. 
1,273    

Deferred: 

Federal......................................................................................................................... 
State............................................................................................................................. 

(1,358)

100    

(1,258)

$ 

15   $ 

(1,137) $  1,073  
145  
1,218  

(1,229)

(92)

1,930    
40    
1,970    

(398)
313  
(85)
741   $  1,133  

The total tax provision differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory 
federal income tax rate to income before income taxes as follows: 

Provision for federal income taxes at the applicable statutory rate.......................................$ 
Increase in provision resulting from state income taxes, net of federal income tax 

benefit .............................................................................................................................. 
Effect of change in state statutory rate.................................................................................. 
Other, net .............................................................................................................................. 

$ 

2004  

2003  

2002  

13   $ 

663   $ 

772  

1    
—      
1    
15   $ 

60  
52    
270  
—      
26    
31  
741   $  1,133  

Deferred income taxes result from differences in the bases of assets and liabilities for 
tax and accounting purposes. 

Receivables allowance..........................................................................................................   
Inventory capitalization ........................................................................................................   
Incentive compensation ........................................................................................................   
Franchise tax.........................................................................................................................   
Employee benefits ................................................................................................................   
Other .....................................................................................................................................   

Current tax assets, net................................................................................................

Incentive compensation ........................................................................................................   
Pension and health care benefits ...........................................................................................   
Depreciation..........................................................................................................................   
Asset impairment reserve......................................................................................................   
Non-current tax assets, net ..........................................................................................   

2004  

2003  

$ 

425   $ 
359    
263    
2    
1,401    
(121)

543  
388  
436  
(7)
929  
(53)
$  2,329   $  2,236  
477  
3,683  
(1,429)
—    
$  3,896   $  2,731  

270   $ 
4,798    
(1,193)

21    

$ 

No valuation allowance was provided against deferred tax assets in the accompanying statements.  

NOTE 5- Line of Credit:  

Under the terms of a revolving line of credit with Bank of America, the Company may borrow up to $2,000 through 
April  30,  2006.  The  interest  rate  is  at  the  bank’s  reference  rate  unless  the  Company  elects  an  optional  interest  rate.  The 
borrowing  agreement  contains  various  covenants,  the  more  significant  of  which  require  the  Company  to  maintain  certain 
levels  of  shareholders’  equity  and  working  capital.  The  Company  was  in  compliance  with  all  provisions  of  the  agreement 
during the year. There were no borrowings under this line of credit during the year.  

29

 
  
   
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
NOTE 6- Contingencies and Commitments:  

The Company leases certain transportation and computer equipment under operating leases expiring in 2006. The terms 
of  the  transportation  lease  provide  for  annual  renewal  options  and  contingent  rental  payments  based  upon  mileage  and 
adjustments of rental payments based on the Consumer Price Index. Minimum rental payments were $379 in fiscal year 2004, 
$400 in fiscal year 2003, and $358 in fiscal year 2002. Contingent payments were $153 in fiscal year 2004, $168 in fiscal 
year 2003, and $130 in fiscal year 2002. Future minimum lease payments are approximately $304 in the years 2005 and $28 
in 2006.  

NOTE 7- Segment Information:  

The Company has two reportable operating segments, Frozen Food Products (the processing and distribution of frozen 
products),  and  Refrigerated  and  Snack  Food  Products  (the  processing  and  distribution  of  refrigerated  meat  and  other 
convenience foods). The Company implemented a new information system in fiscal 2004. Refinements to that system have 
been made as of fiscal year end 2004 that allow segment information to be provided to the chief operating decision maker. 
Therefore, this information is presented for the fiscal year 2004. The prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the 
reportable segments presented.  

The  Company  evaluates  each  segment’s  performance  based  on  revenues  and  operating  income.  Selling  and  general 
administrative  expense  includes  corporate  accounting,  information  systems,  human  resource  management  and  marketing, 
which are managed at the corporate level. These activities are allocated to each operating segment based on revenues and/or 
actual usage.  

The following segment information is for the years ended October 29, 2004, October 31, 2003, and November 1, 2002:  

2004 

Frozen Food 
Products  

Refrigerated 
and 
Snack Food 
Products 

Other  

Elimination  

Totals  

(3,943)

(3,943)

(3,943)

—      
—      
—      

 —     $  137,865  
—    
137,865  
90,306  
43,728  
(553)
4,345  
137,826  
39  
15  
24  
74,942  
3,444  

—      
—      
 —     $ 
 —     $ 
 —     $ 

(3,943)

Sales..........................................................................  $ 
Intersegment sales.....................................................   
Net sales....................................................................   
Cost of products sold, excluding depreciation ..........   
Selling, general and administrative expenses ...........   
Gain on sale of equity securities ...............................   
Depreciation..............................................................   

Income before taxes ..................................................   
Provision for taxes on income ..................................   
Net income (loss) ......................................................  $ 
Total assets ...............................................................  $ 
Additions to property, plant and equipment..............  $ 

44,240  $ 
—   

44,240 

25,644 
13,541 
—   
1,967 

41,152 

3,088 
1,173 

93,625   $ 
3,943    
97,568    
68,605    
30,187    
(553)
2,378    
100,617    
(3,049)
(1,158)

 —    $ 
—   

—   

—   
—   
—   
—   

—   

—   
—   

1,915  $ 

12,943  $ 
211  $ 

(1,891) $ 
 —    $ 
36,433   $  25,566  $ 
3,149   $ 
84  $ 

30

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2003 

Frozen Food 
Products  

Refrigerated 
and 
Snack Food 
Products 

Other  

Elimination  

Totals  

Sales..........................................................................  $ 
Intersegment sales.....................................................   
Net sales....................................................................   
Cost of products sold, excluding depreciation ..........   
Selling, general and administrative expenses ...........   
Gain on sale of equity securities ...............................   
Depreciation..............................................................   

Income before taxes ..................................................   
Provision for taxes on income ..................................   
Net income (loss) ......................................................  $ 
Total assets ...............................................................  $ 
Additions to property, plant and equipment..............  $ 

45,765  $ 
—   

45,765 

25,901 
13,606 
—   
1,995 

41,502 

4,263 
1,620 

90,486   $ 
4,815    
95,301    
65,125    
30,170    
—      
2,318    
97,613    
(2,312)
(879)

 —    $ 
—   

—   

—   
—   
—   
—   

—   

—   
—   

2,643  $ 

14,514  $ 
634  $ 

(1,433) $ 
 —    $ 
32,599   $  28,814  $ 
2,351   $ 
107  $ 

(4,815)

(4,815)

(4,815)

—      
—      
—      

 —     $  136,251  
—    
136,251  
86,211  
43,776  
—    
4,313  
134,300  
1,951  
741  
1,210  
75,927  
3,092  

—      
—      
 —     $ 
 —     $ 
 —     $ 

(4,815)

2002 

Frozen Food 
Products  

Refrigerated 
and 
Snack Food 
Products 

Sales..........................................................................  $ 
Intersegment sales..................................................... 
Net sales.................................................................... 
Cost of products sold, excluding depreciation .......... 
Selling, general and administrative expenses ........... 
Gain on sale of equity securities ............................... 
Depreciation.............................................................. 

Income before taxes .................................................. 
Provision for taxes on income .................................. 
Net income (loss) ......................................................  $ 
Total assets ...............................................................  $ 
Additions to property, plant and equipment..............  $ 

Other  

Elimination  

Totals  

 —    $ 
—   

 —     $  139,202 
—   

(3,944)

(3,944)

139,202 

(3,944)

—      
—      
—      

88,460 
44,263 
—   
4,208 

(3,944)

136,931 

—      
—      
 —     $ 
 —     $ 
 —     $ 

2,271 
1,133 

1,138 

77,182 
3,767 

49,138  $ 
—   

49,138 

28,647 
13,826 
—   
1,950 

44,423 

4,715 
2,353 

90,064   $ 
3,944    
94,008    
63,757    
30,437    
—      
2,258    
96,452    
(2,444)
(1,220)

—   

—   
—   
—   
—   

—   

—   
—   

2,362  $ 

17,258  $ 
1,765  $ 

(1,224) $ 
 —    $ 
30,301   $  29,623  $ 
1,894   $ 
108  $ 

31

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE  

To the Board of Directors of  
Bridgford Foods Corporation  

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated January 27, 2005 also included an 
audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement 
schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related 
consolidated financial statements.  

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  
Orange County, California  
January 27, 2005  

32

 
  
  
  
  
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION  
SCHEDULE II  
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS  
(in thousands)  

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 
Changes in 
Provisions for 
Doubtful Accounts 
Receivable  

Accounts 
Written Off Less 
Recoveries  

Balance 
at Close of 
Period 

Balance at 
Beginning 
of year 

Year ended November 1, 2002 ............................................ $ 
Year ended October 31, 2003 .............................................. $ 
Year ended October 29, 2004 .............................................. $ 

779  $ 
3,419  $ 
1,429  $ 

3,750   $ 
915   $ 
(246) $ 

1,110  $ 
2,905  $ 
65  $ 

3,419 
1,429 
1,118 

Year ended November 1, 2002 ............................................ $ 
Year ended October 31, 2003 .............................................. $ 
Year ended October 29, 2004 .............................................. $ 

385  $ 
1,186  $ 
1,847  $ 

5,935   $ 
6,136   $ 
6,140   $ 

5,134  $ 
5,475  $ 
5,619  $ 

1,186 
1,847 
2,368 

Promotional Allowances  

Balance at 
Beginning 
of year  

Allowance 
for Accruals 

Promotions 
Incurred  

Balance 
at Close of 
Period  

33

 
   
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION  

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT  

Name of Subsidiary 

Bridgford Marketing Company 
Bridgford Meat Company 
Bridgford Food Processing Corporation 
Bridgford Food Processing of Texas, L.P.** 
A.S.I. Corporation 
Bridgford Distributing Company of Delaware (inactive) 
American Ham Processors, Inc.* (inactive) 
Bert Packing Company (inactive) 
Moriarty Meat Company (inactive) 

* - No shares have been issued.  

** - Limited Partnership.  

Exhibit 21.1  

State in which Incorporated
California 
California 
California 
Texas 
California 
Delaware 
Delaware 
Illinois 
Illinois 

34

 
  
  
   
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on  Form  S-8 (No. 333-79547) of 
Bridgford Foods Corporation of our report dated January 27, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial  statements,  which 
appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to 
the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 27, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statement schedule, 
which appears in this Form 10-K.  

Exhibit 23.1  

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  
Orange County, California  
January 27, 2005  

35

 
  
  
  
  
Exhibit 31.1  

I, Allan L. Bridgford, certify that:  

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bridgford Foods Corporation;  

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a 
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, 
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and  

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly 
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the 
periods presented in this annual report.  

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and 
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be 
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its 
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in 
which this report is being prepared;  

[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos 33-8238 and 34-47986];  

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our 
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered 
by this report based on such evaluation; and  

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred 
during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual 
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control 
over financial reporting; and  

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control 
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons 
performing the equivalent functions):  

a. 

b. 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial 
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize 
and report financial information; and  

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in 
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  

Dated: January 27, 2005  

/s/    ALLAN L. BRIDGFORD         
Allan L. Bridgford, Chairman 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

36

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
Exhibit 31.2  

I, Raymond F. Lancy, certify that:  

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bridgford Foods Corporation;  

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a 
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, 
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and  

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly 
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the 
periods presented in this annual report.  

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and 
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be 
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its 
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in 
which this report is being prepared;  

[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos 33-8238 and 34-47986];  

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our 
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered 
by this report based on such evaluation; and  

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred 
during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual 
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control 
over financial reporting; and  

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control 
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons 
performing the equivalent functions):  

a. 

b. 

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial 
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize 
and report financial information; and  

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in 
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  

Dated: January 27, 2005  

/s/    RAYMOND F. LANCY         
Raymond F. Lancy 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

37

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
Exhibit 32.1  

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  

I, Allan L. Bridgford, Chairman of the Board of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  

(1) 

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 29, 2004 (the “Report”) fully 
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m 
or 780(d)); and  

(2) 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results 
of operations of the Company.  

Dated: January 27, 2005  

/s/    ALLAN L. BRIDGFORD         
Allan L. Bridgford, 
Chairman of the Board 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

38

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.2  

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  

I, Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Bridgford Foods 
Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
that:  

(1) 

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 29, 2004 (the “Report”) fully 
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m 
or 780(d)); and  

(2) 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results 
of operations of the Company.  

Dated: January 27, 2005  

/s/    RAYMOND F. LANCY         
Raymond F. Lancy 
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President 
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

39

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 
 
(This page intentionally left blank.)

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS 

March 16, 2005 

To the Shareholders of 
BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION: 

The  annual  meeting  of  the  shareholders  of  Bridgford  Foods  Corporation,  a  California  corporation  (the 
"Company"),  will  be  held  at  the  Four  Points  Sheraton,1500  South  Raymond  Avenue,  Fullerton,  California,  on 
Wednesday, March 16, 2005 at 10:00 a.m., for the following purposes: 

(1) To elect eight directors to hold office for one year or until their successors are elected and 

qualified. 

(2)  To ratify the appointment of Haskell & White LLP as independent public accountants of the 

Company for the fiscal year commencing October 30, 2004. 

(3)  To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment 

thereof. 

Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 28, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at 

said meeting or any adjournment thereof. 

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. HOWEVER, TO ASSURE YOUR 
REPRESENTATION AT THE MEETING, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESPECTFULLY URGES YOU TO SIGN, 
DATE  AND  PROMPTLY  RETURN  THE  ACCOMPANYING  PROXY  CARD 
IN  THE  ENCLOSED 
POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE. If you attend the meeting in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote 
your own shares. 

                                         By order of the Board of Directors  

                                         William L. Bridgford 
                                         President and Secretary 

  /s/ 

Anaheim, California 
February 7, 2005 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(This page intentionally left blank.)

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION 
1308 North Patt Street, Anaheim, California  92801 

PROXY STATEMENT 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held March 16, 2005 

The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Bridgford Foods Corporation, a California 
corporation  (the  "Company"),  for  use  at  the  annual  meeting  of  shareholders  of  the  Company  (the  "Annual 
Meeting")  to  be  held  at  the  Four  Points  Sheraton,  1500  South  Raymond  Avenue,  Fullerton,  California,  on 
Wednesday, March 16, 2005 at 10:00 a.m., and at any adjournment thereof. All shareholders of record at the 
close of business on January 28, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting. This Proxy Statement 
and the accompanying proxy are being mailed on or about February 7, 2005. 

The persons named as proxies were designated by the Board of Directors and are officers and directors 
of the Company. Any proxy may be revoked or superseded by executing a later proxy or by giving notice of 
revocation in writing prior to, or at, the Annual Meeting, or by attending the Annual Meeting, withdrawing the proxy 
and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute revocation of the proxy. 
All proxies, which are properly completed, signed and returned to the Company prior to the Annual Meeting, and 
not revoked, will be voted in accordance with the instructions given in the proxy. If a choice is not specified in the 
proxy, the proxy will be voted FOR election of the director nominees proposed by the Board of Directors and FOR 
ratification of the Company's appointment of Haskell & White LLP as independent public accountants for the 
Company.  Management does not know of any matters which will be brought before the Annual Meeting other 
than those specifically set forth in the notice hereof. However, if any other matter properly comes before the 
Annual Meeting, it is intended that the proxies, or their substitutes, will vote on such matters in accordance with 
their best judgment. 

Solicitation of proxies will be primarily by mail, although some of the officers, directors and employees of 
the  Company  may  solicit  proxies  personally  or  by  telephone.    All  expenses  incurred  in  connection  with  this 
solicitation will be borne by the Company.  The Company will reimburse brokers and others who incur costs to 
send proxy materials to beneficial owners of stock in a broker or nominee name. 

At the close of business on January 28, 2005, there were 9,999,361 shares of common stock of the 
Company outstanding. The presence at the meeting of a majority of the outstanding shares, in person or by proxy 
relating to any matter to be acted upon at the meeting, is necessary to constitute a quorum for the meeting. Each 
share  of  common  stock  entitles  the  holder  thereof  to  one  vote  on  each  matter  to  be  voted  upon  by  such 
shareholders and to cumulate votes for the election of directors. For purposes of the quorum and the discussion 
below regarding the vote necessary to take shareholder action, shareholders of record who are present at the 
meeting in person or by proxy and who abstain or withhold their vote, including brokers holding customers' shares 
of record who cause abstentions to be recorded at the meeting, are considered shareholders who are present 
and entitled to vote and count toward the quorum. Brokers holding shares of record for customers generally are 
not entitled to vote on certain matters unless they receive voting instructions from their customers. As used 
herein, "uninstructed shares" means shares held by a broker who has not received instructions from its customers 
on such matters and the broker has so notified the Company on a proxy form in accordance with industry practice 
or has otherwise advised the Company that it lacks voting authority. As used herein, "broker non-vote" means the 
votes that could have been cast on the matter in question by brokers with respect to uninstructed shares if the 
brokers had received their customers' instructions. The effect of proxies marked "withheld" as to any director 
nominee or "abstain" as to a particular proposal and broker non-votes on proposals Nos. 1 and 2 is discussed 
under each respective proposal.  

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PROPOSAL 1 

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

The  directors  of  the  Company  are  elected  annually  to  serve  until  the  next  annual  meeting  of  the 
shareholders or until their respective successors are elected.  At the Annual Meeting, eight directors are to be 
elected.  The election of directors shall be by the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares voting 
in person or by proxy at the annual meeting.  Every shareholder, or his proxy, entitled to vote upon the election of 
directors may cumulate his or her votes and give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of 
directors to be elected multiplied by the number of votes to which his or her shares are entitled, or distribute his or 
her votes on the same principle among as many candidates as he or she thinks fit.  No shareholder or proxy, 
however, shall be entitled to cumulate votes unless such candidate or candidates have been nominated prior to 
the voting and the shareholder has given notice at the meeting, prior to the voting, of the shareholder's intention to 
cumulate such shareholder's votes.  If any one shareholder gives such notice, all shareholders may cumulate 
their votes for candidates in nomination.  Except for Messer’s. William L. Bridgford and Todd Andrews, each of 
these individuals has served as a director since the last annual meeting. All current directorships are being filled. 

The Company's Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominees 
named below. Unless otherwise instructed, shares represented by the proxies will be voted for the election of the 
nominees listed below. Broker non-votes and proxies marked "withheld" as to one or more of the nominees will 
result in the respective nominees receiving fewer votes. However, the number of votes otherwise received by the 
nominee will not be reduced by such action. Each nominee has indicated that he is willing and able to serve as 
director if elected.  In the event that any of such nominees shall become unavailable for any reason, an event 
which  management  does  not  anticipate,  it  is  intended  that  proxies  will  be  voted  for  substitute  nominees 
designated by management. 

The following table and biographical summaries set forth, with respect to each nominee for director, his 
age, the positions he holds in the Company and the year in which he first became a director of the Company.  
Data with respect to the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock beneficially owned by each of such 
directors as of January 28, 2005 appears on page 6 of this Proxy Statement. 

  Name 
Allan L. Bridgford 

Age 
70 

Hugh Wm. Bridgford 

73 

William L. Bridgford 

50 

Robert E. Schulze 
Todd C. Andrews 
Paul  A. Gilbert 
Richard A. Foster 
Paul R. Zippwald 

70 
39   
62 
69 
67 

Current Position at the Company(1) 
Chairman of the Board and Member of the 
Executive Committee 
Chairman of the Executive Committee, 
Vice President and Director 
President and Director and member of the 
Executive Committee        
Director 
Director 
Director 
Director 
Director, Audit Committee Chairman 

Year 
First Became 
Director 

1952 

1952 

2004 
1980 
2004 
1993 
2001 
1992 

 (1) Robert E. Schulze was President of the Company until he retired June 30, 2004.  Hugh Wm. Bridgford and 
Allan L. Bridgford are brothers.  William L. Bridgford was elected to the Board of Directors on August 9, 
2004 and he is the son of Hugh Wm. Bridgford and the nephew of Allan L. Bridgford. 

Directors 

Allan L. Bridgford, elected Chairman of the Board in March of 1995, served previously as President of the 
Company for more than five years and has been a full-time employee of the Company since 1957. Mr. Bridgford 
has served as a member of the Executive Committee since 1972.  Allan L. Bridgford reduced his work schedule 
to 80% since March of the 2000 fiscal year and his compensation was reduced as well. 

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:3)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hugh Wm. Bridgford, elected Chairman of the Executive Committee and elected Vice President in March of 
1995, previously served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company for more than five years and has 
been a full time employee of the Company since 1955 and has served as a member of the Executive Committee 
since 1972. 

Todd C. Andrews is a Certified Public Accountant and currently serves as Vice President and Controller of 
Public Storage, Inc. headquartered in Glendale, California. Mr. Andrews, a resident of Valencia, California, is a 
graduate of California State University, Northridge. 

William L. Bridgford, elected President June of 2004, served previously as Secretary of the Company for 
more than the past five years and was elected as an Executive Officer in 2001 and has been a full-time employee 
of the Company since 1987. 

Robert  E.  Schulze  was  elected  President  in  March  of  1995  and  served  previously  as  Executive  Vice 
President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company for more than five years.  Mr. Schulze retired effective June 
30, 2004. 

Paul A. Gilbert is a Senior Vice President at SmithBarney citigroup for more than ten years and was formerly 

with Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated, an investment banking firm.  

Richard A. Foster was President of Interstate Electronics Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Figgie 
International, Inc., from 1979 until his retirement in 1991.  Mr. Foster also served as Vice President of Figgie 
International, Inc. from 1986 to 1991.   

Paul R. Zippwald was Regional Vice President and Head of Commercial Banking for Bank of America 
NT&SA, North Orange County, California, for more than five years prior to his retirement in July 1992.  Mr. 
Zippwald is currently retired. 

The Company is considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of Rule 4350(c)(5) of the National 
Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and is therefore exempted from various NASD rules pertaining to 
certain “independence” requirements of its directors.  Nevertheless, the Board of Directors has determined that 
Messrs. Andrews, Gilbert, Foster and Zippwald are all “independent directors” within the meaning of Rule 4200 of 
the National Association of Securities Dealers  

During fiscal year 2004 the Company's Board of Directors held 12 regular monthly meetings. Each of the 
nominees  holding  office  during  this  period  attended  at  least  75%  of  the  monthly  meetings.  Non-employee 
directors were paid $1,050 for each meeting attended.  Employee directors received no additional compensation 
for their services. 

Board Committees 

During fiscal year 2004, Norman V. Wagner II resigned from the Board of Directors and Todd C. Andrews 
was elected to fill this vacancy. Steven H. Price died in July 2004 and William L. Bridgford was elected to fill this 
vacancy. 

The  Board  of  Directors  maintains  three  committees,  the  Compensation  Committee,  the  Nominating 
Committee and the Audit Committee. The Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Andrews, Gilbert, 
Foster,  and  Zippwald  at  the  close  of  the  Company’s  fiscal  year.  Each  member  served  without  additional 
compensation.    Each  of  the  members  of  the  Compensation  Committee  are  non-employee  directors  and 
independent as defined under the NASD’s listing standards.  The Compensation Committee is responsible for 
establishing  and  administering  the  Company's  compensation  arrangements  for  all  executive  officers.    The 
Compensation  Committee  held  two  formal  meetings  during  fiscal  2004,  each  of  which  was  attended  by  all 
committee members. 

The Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Andrews, Gilbert, Foster and Zippwald, each of whom receive 
$300 or $500 per meeting, depending on length of meeting attended.  The Audit Committee has been established 

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:4)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
in accordance with SEC rules and regulations, and each of the members of the Audit Committee are independent 
directors as defined under the NASD’s listing standards.  The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Andrews 
qualifies as a “financial expert” as such term is used in the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Audit Committee 
meets periodically with the Company's independent public accountants and reviews the Company's accounting 
policies and internal controls. It also reviews the scope and adequacy of the independent public accountants' 
examination of the Company's annual financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee recommends the 
firm of independent public accountants to be retained by the Company and pre-approves services rendered by its 
independent public accountants. The Audit Committee held monthly formal meetings during fiscal 2004.  All Audit 
Committee members attended the twelve monthly meetings, except one director who missed three meetings.  In 
addition, the Audit Committee holds a pre-earnings release conference with the Company’s independent public 
accountants on a quarterly basis.  The Audit Committee adopted a written Audit Committee Charter on May 8, 
2000 and amended the charter on August 11, 2003 

Nominating Committee 

The Board of Directors has decided that the full Board should perform the functions of a nominating 
committee  for  the  Company.  It  made  that  decision  because  the  Board  believes  that  selecting  new  Board 
nominees is one of the most important responsibilities the Board members have to our shareholders and, for that 
reason, all of the members of the Board should have the right and responsibility to participate in the selection 
process.  In  its  role  as  nominating  committee,  the  Board  identifies  and  screens  new  candidates  for  Board 
membership. Nevertheless, actions of the Board, in its role as nominating committee, can be taken only with the 
affirmative vote of a majority of the independent directors on the Board. Our Board of Directors intends to adopt a 
charter setting forth the responsibilities of the Board when acting as a nominating committee and will post a copy 
of this charter on its website at www.bridgford.com upon adoption. The Board met in May and also in August 
during fiscal 2004 to ratify the appointment of two new directors in its role as nominating committee.  

The  Director  Nominating  Process.  In  identifying  new  Board  candidates,  the  Board  will  seek 
recommendations from existing board members and executive officers. In addition, the Board intends to consider 
any candidates that may have been recommended by any of the Company’s shareholders who have chosen to 
make those recommendations in accordance with the procedures described below. The Board also has the 
authority to engage an executive search firm and other advisors as it deems appropriate to assist in identifying 
qualified candidates for the Board.  

In assessing and selecting Board candidates, the Board will consider such factors, among others, as the 
candidate’s independence, experience, knowledge, skills and expertise, as demonstrated by past employment 
and board experience; the candidate’s reputation for integrity; and the candidate’s participation in local community 
and local, state, regional or national charitable organizations. When selecting a nominee from among candidates 
considered by the Board, it will conduct background inquiries of and interviews with the candidates the Board 
members believe are best qualified to serve as directors. The Board members will consider a number of factors in 
making  their  selection  of  a  nominee  from  among  those  candidates,  including,  among  others,  whether  the 
candidate has the ability, willingness and enthusiasm to devote the time and effort required of members of the 
Board;  whether  the  candidate  has  any  conflicts  of  interest  or  commitments  that  would  interfere  with  the 
candidate’s  ability  to  fulfill  the  responsibilities  of  directors  of  the  Company,  including  membership  on  Board 
committees; whether the candidate’s skills and experience would add to the overall competencies of the Board; 
and whether the candidate has any special background or experience relevant to the Company’s business.  

Shareholder  Recommendation  of  Board  Candidates.  Any  shareholder  desiring  to  submit  a 
recommendation for consideration by the Board of a candidate that the shareholder believes is qualified to be a 
Board nominee at any upcoming shareholders meeting may do so by submitting that recommendation in writing to 
the Board not later 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which the proxy materials for the prior 
year’s annual meeting were first sent to shareholders. However, if the date of the upcoming annual meeting has 
been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the prior year’s meeting, the recommendation must be 
received  within  a  reasonable  time  before  the  Company  begins  to  print  and  mail  its  proxy  materials  for  the 
upcoming annual meeting. In addition, the recommendation should be accompanied by the following information: 
(i) the name and address of the nominating shareholder and of the person or persons being recommended for 
consideration as a candidate for Board membership; (ii) the number of shares of voting stock of the Company that 
are owned by the nominating shareholder, his or her recommended candidate and any other shareholders known 
by the nominating shareholder to be supporting the candidate’s nomination; (iii) a description of any arrangements 

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:5)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
or understandings, that relate to the election of directors of the Company, between the nominating shareholder, or 
any person that (directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries) controls, or is controlled by, or is under 
common control with, such shareholder and any other person or persons (naming such other person or persons); 
(iv) such other information regarding each such recommended candidate as would be required to be included in a 
proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (v) the written 
consent of each such recommended candidate to be named as a nominee and, if nominated and elected, to 
serve as a director. 

Code of Ethics 
(cid:1)

The Company adopted a Code of Ethics that is applicable to, among others, its principal executive officer, 
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, and 
posted the Code of Ethics on its website at www.bridgford.com.  

Communications with the Board 

Shareholders may communicate with the Board or any of the directors by sending written communications 
addressed to the Board or any of the directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Bridgford Foods Corporation, 1308 North 
Patt  Street,  Anaheim,  California  92801.    All  communications  are  compiled  by  the  Corporate  Secretary  and 
forwarded to the Board or the individual director(s) accordingly. 

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings  

Directors are strongly encouraged to attend annual meetings of the Company’s shareholders.  [All eight (8) 

directors attended the 2004 annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders.] 

Executive Officers 

The Company has four executive officers elected on an annual basis to serve at the pleasure of the Board 

of Directors: 

Allan L. Bridgford 
Hugh Wm. Bridgford 
William L. Bridgford 
Raymond F. Lancy 

Chairman(1) 
Vice President(1) 
President and Secretary (1) (2) 
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Executive Vice 
President (1) 

(1)  Members of the Company's Executive Committee that acts in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer of 

the Company. 

(2)  William L. Bridgford is the son of Hugh Wm. Bridgford and the nephew of Allan L. Bridgford. 

A  biographical  summary  regarding  Messrs.  Allan  L.  Bridgford,  William  L.  Bridgford  and  Hugh  Wm. 
Bridgford is set forth above under the caption "Directors." Biographical information with respect to the Company's 
other executive officers is set forth below: 

Raymond F. Lancy, age 51, has served as Treasurer of the Company for more than the past five years, 

was elected Chief Financial Officer in 2003 and was elected as an Executive Officer in 2001. 

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:6)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT 

The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company with respect to the beneficial 
ownership of the Company's Common Stock as of January 28, 2005 by each shareholder known by the Company 
to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company's Common Stock, by each director, and nominee for 
director by each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and by all officers and directors as 
a group. 

Amount and Nature of Shares Beneficially Owned  

Sole 
Voting and 
Investment Power 

Shared 
Voting and 
Investment Power(3) 

Total 
Beneficially Owned(2) 

7,156,396 

--   

7,156,396 

47,917 

7,156,396 

7,204,313 

155,882 
7,986 
1,654 

167,870 
31,175 
25,000 
200 
605 
2,234 
1,452 

7,156,396 
7,156,396 
7,156,396 

-- 
7,156,396 
-- 

-- 
-- 
-- 

7,312,278 
7,164,382 
7,158,050 

(4) 
(5) 

167,870 
7,187,571    
25,000 
200 
605 
2,234 
1,452 

  Name and Address 
of Beneficial Owner(1) 

Bridgford Industries 
 Incorporated 
 1707 Good-Latimer Expy. 
  Dallas, TX 75226 
Hugh Wm. Bridgford 
 1707 Good-Latimer Expy. 
  Dallas, TX 75226 
Allan L. Bridgford 
Bruce H. Bridgford 
Baron R.H.  Bridgford 
 170 North Green St. 
 Chicago, IL 60607 
Robert E. Schulze 
William L. Bridgford 
Raymond F. Lancy 
Todd C. Andrews 
Paul A. Gilbert 
Richard A. Foster 
Paul R. Zippwald 

Percentage  
of 
Outstanding 
Shares 
Beneficially Owned(2) 

71.6 

72.0 

73.1 
71.6 
71.6 

1.7 
71.9 
* 

* 
* 
* 

All directors and officers 
  as a group  (12 persons) 
* Less than one percent (1%). 

7,598,371 

7,156,396 

7,598,371 

(6) 

76.0 

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the address of such beneficial owner is the Company’s principal executive offices, 1308 N. Patt Street, Anaheim, 
California 92801. 
(2) Applicable percentage of ownership at January 28, 2005 is based upon 9,999,361 shares of common stock outstanding.  Beneficial ownership 
is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and includes voting and investment power with respect to 
shares shown as beneficially owned.  Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of 
January 28, 2005 are deemed outstanding for computing the shares and percentage ownership of the person holding such options or warrants, but 
are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person or entity. 
(3) Represents shares beneficially owned by Bridgford Industries Incorporated, a Delaware corporation ("BII"), which presently has no other 
significant business or assets. Allan L. Bridgford, Hugh Wm. Bridgford, William L. Bridgford, Baron R.H. Bridgford and Bruce H. Bridgford presently 
own 16.06%, 10.54%, 7.48%, 9.54% and 10.29%, respectively, of the outstanding voting capital stock of BII and each has the right to vote as 
trustee or custodian for other shareholders of BII representing 0%, 0%, .58%, 1.75% and .63%, respectively, of such outstanding voting capital 
stock. The remaining percentage of BII stock is owned of record, or beneficially, by 32 additional members of the Bridgford family. The officers of 
BII jointly vote all shares. 
(4) Includes 25,000 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of January 28, 2005.  
(5) Consists of 25,000 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of January 28, 2005. 
(6) Includes 50,000 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options within 60 days of January 28, 2005. 

The Company is not aware of any arrangements that may at a subsequent date result in a change of 

control of the Company.  

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company's directors, 
executive officers, and holders of more than 10% of the Company's Common Stock, to file with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common 
Stock of the Company. Officers, directors and 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the 
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the Company's knowledge, based solely on the review of 
copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, 
during  the  fiscal  year  ended  October  29,  2004,  all  of  the  Company's  officers,  directors  and  10%  shareholders 
complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements. 

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

The  following  table  sets  forth  summary  information  concerning  compensation  paid  or  accrued  by  the 
Company for services rendered during the three fiscal years ended 2004, 2003, and 2002 to the Company's chief 
executive officer and the four remaining most highly paid executive officers whose salary and bonus exceeded 
$100,000 (the “Named Executive Officers”). 

Summary Compensation Table 

             Annual Compensation 

Name and Principal Position 

Allan L. Bridgford 
  Chairman of the 
  Board(1)

Robert E. Schulze 
  President(1)(4) 

Hugh Wm. Bridgford 
  Vice President and 
  Chairman of the  
  Executive Committee(1) 

William L. Bridgford  
  President and Secretary (1) 

Raymond F. Lancy (1) 
  Chief Financial Officer, 
  Vice President and Treasurer 

Year  

2004 
2003 
2002 

2004 
2003 
2002 

2004 
2003 
2002 

2004 
2003 
2002 

2004 
2003 
2002 

Salary($) 

 230,512 
213,252 
277,509 

Bonus($)  

_   
24,000(2)   
36,000(2) 

190,978 
237,536                                  30,000(2) 
    45,000(2) 
267,683 

_ 

239,458 
210,392 
257,077 

86,660 
77,480 
76,480 

150,600 
145,400 
140,000 

_ 
30,000(2)  
45,000(2)   

98,720 
83,261 
86,981 

35,000 
40,000 
49,000 

All 
Other 
Compen- 
sation($) 

73,907(3) 

159,000(3) 

- 
- 

(1) Hugh Wm. Bridgford, Allan L. Bridgford, William L. Bridgford and Raymond F. Lancy are members of the Company's Executive Committee 
which acts in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer of the Company. 
(2)  Represents  deferred  contingent  compensation  payable  over  periods  of  five  years  pursuant  to  bonuses  granted  by  the  Company's 
Compensation Committee. 
(3) Represents premiums paid by the Company in connection with split-dollar insurance policies. 
(4) Robert Schulze retired as President on June 30, 2004 and William L. Bridgford was elected to serve as President.  

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:8)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
None of the Named Executive Officers exercised options during the fiscal year ended October 29, 2004. The 
following  table  sets  forth  certain  information  concerning  the  number  of  shares  covered  by  both  exercisable  and 
unexercisable stock options as of October 29, 2004.  Also reported are the values for “in the money” options which 
represent the positive spread between the exercise prices of any such existing stock options and $8.40, the closing price 
of Common Stock on October 29, 2004, as reported by The Nasdaq National Market. 

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year 
and Fiscal Year-End Option Values 

Value Realized($) 
(market price 
at exercise 
less exercise 
price) 

Shares Acquired 
on Exercise(#) 

  Number of Securities 

Underlying Unexercised   
Options at FY-End(#) 
Exercisable   Unexercisable 

Value of Unexercised 
In-the-Money 
Options at FY-End($) 

Exercisable 

  Unexercisable 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

$ 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

25,000 

25,000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

$ 

0  $ 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Name 

Allan L. Bridgford 

Robert E. Schulze 

Hugh Wm. Bridgford 

William L. Bridgford 

Raymond F. Lancy 

(cid:1)

RETIREMENT PLAN 

The  Company  has  a  defined  benefit  plan  ("Plan")  for  those  of  its  employees  not  covered  by  collective 
bargaining  agreements.  The  Plan,  administered  by  a  major  life  insurance  company,  presently  provides  that 
participants receive an annual benefit on retirement equal to 1.5% of their total compensation from the Company 
during their period of participation from 1958.  Benefits are not reduced by Social Security payments or by payments 
from other sources and are payable in the form of fully-insured monthly lifetime annuity contracts commencing at age 
65 or the participant's date of retirement, whichever is later. Based on projections used for computing benefits under 
the Plan, the estimated annual benefits at normal or current retirement would be as follows:  

Allan L. Bridgford 
Robert E. Schulze 
Hugh Wm. Bridgford 
William L. Bridgford 
Raymond F. Lancy 

$ 63,416 
   59,591 
   63,356 
   75,481 
   68,151 

All officers 

  $329,995   

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:9)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 

Retirement benefits otherwise available to key executives under the Company's Plan have been limited by 
the effects of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 ("TEFRA") and the Tax Reform Act of 1986 
("TRA"). To offset the loss of retirement benefits associated with TEFRA and TRA, the Company has adopted a 
non-qualified "makeup" benefit plan (Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan). Benefits will be provided under this 
plan for members of the Executive Committee equal to 60% of their final average earnings minus any pension 
benefits and primary insurance amounts available to them under Social Security. However, in all cases the combined 
benefits  are  capped  at  $120,000  per  year  for  Messer’s.  Allan  L.  Bridgford,  Robert  E.  Schulze  and  Hugh  Wm. 
Bridgford. Benefits provided under this plan for William L. Bridgford and Raymond F. Lancy are calculated at 50% of 
final average earnings, capped at $200,000 per year, without offsets for other pension or Social Security benefits. 
Eligibility is determined by the Board of Directors of the Company and the projected annual benefits to be paid at 
normal or current retirement date to those presently selected are as follows:  

Allan L. Bridgford 
Robert E. Schulze 
Hugh Wm. Bridgford 
William L. Bridgford 
Raymond F. Lancy 

$  51,528   
    56,100 
    61,080 
  159,350 
  158,596 

All officers  

  $ 486,654  

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:10)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notwithstanding  anything  to  the  contrary  set  forth  in  any  of  the  Company's  previous  filings  under  the 
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate 
future filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the following reports of the Compensation Committee 
and the Audit Committee and the Performance Graph on page 12 shall not be incorporated by reference into such 
filings. 

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE 

The Compensation Committee of the Company consists of the outside members of the Board of Directors. 
As of October 29, 2004, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Andrews, Gilbert, Foster and Zippwald. 
The Company's executive compensation policy's aim is to attract, retain and motivate key employees while making 
sure that a relationship exists between executive compensation and the Company’s performance. Accordingly, the 
Company policy of compensation for its executive officers is to combine annual base salaries with bonuses based 
upon corporate performance. 

Historically, the Company has been principally managed by an Executive Committee consisting of senior 
executive officers of the Company. The Executive Committee, as a unit, serves as the Company's "Chief Executive 
Officer".  The  Executive  Committee  currently  consists  of  four  members.    The  current  members  are  Hugh  Wm. 
Bridgford, Chairman of the Executive Committee, Allan L. Bridgford, Chairman of the Board of Directors, William L. 
Bridgford, President and Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Treasurer. For the last 
several years, the Compensation Committee has determined that Messers. Allan L. Bridgford, Hugh Wm. Bridgford 
and Robert E. Schulze (retired June 30, 2004) should be compensated on an equal basis with pro-rata adjustments 
for reduced work schedules. 

The  current  compensation  plan  for  Messer’s  Allan  L.  Bridgford  and  Hugh  Wm.  Bridgford  sets  forth  a 
minimum base salary of $2,000 per week plus incentive amounts that may be earned as additional future salary 
and/or  as  deferred  contingent  compensation  ("bonuses").  The  Compensation  Committee  deems  continuity  of 
management to be an important consideration for the long-term success of the business and, therefore, payments of 
bonuses are currently deferred over a five year period. No interest is paid or accrued on the earned but unpaid 
bonuses.  Consistent with the compensation policy for all of the Company's corporate officers, as discussed below, 
the principal factor used by the Compensation Committee to determine the bonuses to be paid the members of the 
Executive Committee is the measure of the Company's performance which is based upon the Company's pretax 
income and return on shareholders' equity for the current fiscal year.  For fiscal 2004, the base salary for Allan L. 
Bridgford was $83,200 and previously deferred salary was $147,312.  For Hugh Wm. Bridgford the base salary was 
$104,000 and previously deferred salary totaled $135,458.  For Robert E. Schulze who retired June 30, 2004, the 
base salary was $68,000 and the previously deferred salary was $122,978. The substantial reductions in bonuses 
earned this year compared to the prior year relate primarily to the decrease in pretax income for the same periods.   

The Compensation Committee has elected not to provide incentive compensation to Messer’s. Allan L. 
Bridgford,  Hugh  Wm.  Bridgford  and  Robert  E.  Schulze  in  the  form  of  stock  options,  stock  appreciation  rights, 
restricted stock or other similar plans. The Compensation Committee also directs that perquisite compensation be 
minimal for members of the Executive Committee. Members of the Executive Committee are not to be provided with 
country club memberships or other similar perquisites. 

Compensation for other executive officers is recommended to the Compensation Committee by Messer’s. 
Allan L. Bridgford, and Hugh Wm. Bridgford who regularly report to the Board of Directors and the Compensation 
Committee on compensation matters relating to other corporate officers. All corporate officers, top-level managers 
and  many  midlevel  managers  receive  compensation  determined  by  performance-based  criteria,  including  both 
individual and team accomplishments. 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE 
Todd C. Andrews 
Richard A. Foster 
Paul A. Gilbert 
Paul R. Zippwald, Chairman 

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:11)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 

Pursuant to a meeting of the Audit Committee on January 26, 2005, the Audit Committee reports that it has: 
(i) reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management; (ii) discussed with the 
independent auditors the matters (such as the quality of the Company’s accounting principles and internal controls) 
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61; and (iii) received written confirmation from 
PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP  that  it  is  independent  and  written  disclosures  regarding  such  independence  as 
required by Independence Standards Board No. 1, and discussed with the auditors the auditors’ independence.  
Based on the review and discussions referred to in items (i) through (iii) above, the Audit Committee recommended 
to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report for the 
Company’s fiscal year ended October 29, 2004. 

AUDIT COMMITTEE 

Todd C. Andrews 
Richard A. Foster 
Paul A. Gilbert 
Paul R. Zippwald, Chairman 

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PERFORMANCE GRAPH 

The comparative stock performance graph shown below compares the yearly change in cumulative value of 
Bridgford Foods Corporation's common stock with certain index values for the five-year periods ended October 29, 
2004.  The graph sets the beginning value of Bridgford common stock and the indexes at $100.  All calculations 
assume reinvestment of dividends on a monthly basis.  The peer group consists of nine companies, including the 
companies that comprised the Meat Industry Group of Media General Financial Services.  The group includes Bob 
Evans Farms, Inc.; Cagle’s, Inc.; Hormel Foods Corporation; Pilgrims Pride Corporation; Sanderson Farms Inc.; 
Seaboard Corp; Tyson Foods, Inc.; and United Heritage Corporation.  The peer group index return consists of the 
weighted returns of each component issuer according to such issuer’s respective stock market capitalization at the 
beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. 

NOTE: The stock price performance shown on the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. 

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG BRIDGFORD FOODS CORP., THE S & P 500 INDEX
AND A PEER GROUP

D
O
L
L
A
R
S

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

10/29/99

11/3/00

11/2/01

11/1/02

10/31/03

10/29/04

BRIDGFORD FOODS CORP.

S & P 500

PEER GROUP

* $100 invested on 10/29/99 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends.  

Copyright © 2002, Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
www.researchdatagroup.com/S&P.htm

(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE IN CONTROL 
AGREEMENTS 

The Company has no employment contracts, severance agreements or change in control agreements. 

As discussed in the Section entitled “Compensation of Executive Officers,” the Company has established a 
defined benefit plan and a non-qualified “makeup” benefit plan for the payment of retirement benefits to its executive 
officers and key employees. 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION 

The  members  of  the  Company’s  Compensation  Committee  at  October  29,  2004  consisted  of  Todd  C. 
Andrews, Paul A. Gilbert, Richard A. Foster and Paul R. Zippwald.  No member of the Compensation Committee is a 
former or current officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.  The Company is not aware of any 
transaction involving any member of the Compensation Committee that would require disclosure for "Compensation 
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation". 

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 

The Company is not aware of any related party transactions that would require disclosure. 

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:4)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PROPOSAL 2 

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

The  Audit  Committee  of  the  Board  of  Directors  has,  subject  to  ratification  by  the  shareholders, 
appointed  Haskell  &  White  LLP  as  independent  public  accountants  for  the  Company  for  the  fiscal  year 
commencing  October  30,  2004.    PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP  was  the  Company’s  independent  public 
accountant since 1958.  In determining whether the proposal has been approved, abstentions will be counted 
as votes against the proposal and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes for or against the proposal or 
as votes present and voting on the proposal. 

Proxies received in response to this solicitation will be voted in favor of the approval of such firm 
unless  otherwise  specified  in  the  proxy.    In  the  event  of  a  negative  vote  on  such  ratification,  the  Audit 
Committee of the Board of Directors will reconsider its selection. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers 
LLP and Haskell & White LLP will be present at the meeting and available for questions and will have the 
opportunity to make a statement if they so desire. 

FEES BILLED BY PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP DURING THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED 
OCTOBER 29, 2004 AND OCTOBER 31, 2003 

Audit Fees: 

Audit fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the audit of the 2004 annual financial statements 
and the review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q in fiscal 2004 totaled 
$163,000. 

Audit fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the audit of our 2003 annual financial statements 
and the review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q in fiscal 2003 totaled 
$140,000. 

Audit-Related Fees: 

We did not incur any audit-related fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during the fiscal years 
ended October 29, 2004 and October 31, 2003.  Such audit-related fees typically consist of fees billed for 
assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our 
consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”  These services may include 
consultations  related  to  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  and  consultations  concerning  financial  accounting  and 
reporting standards. 

Tax Fees: 

Fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice 

and tax planning during the fiscal year ended October 29, 2004 totaled $4,000. 

Fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice 

and tax planning during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 totaled $77,000. 

The fees disclosed under this category are comprised by services that include assistance related to 

state tax compliance services. 

(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:5)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(cid:1)
All Other Fees: 

We did not incur any other fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during the fiscal year ended 

October 29, 2004 or during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003. 

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS 

Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must 
be received at the Company's principal office no later than October 9, 2005 in order to be considered for 
inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. 

Additionally, if the Company is not provided notice of a shareholder proposal, which the 
shareholder has not previously sought to include in the Company’s proxy statement, by December 23, 
2005, the Company will be allowed to use its discretionary voting authority when the proposal is raised at 
the meeting, without any discussion of the matter in the proxy statement. 

(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:6)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(cid:1)

OTHER MATTERS 

The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters to be acted upon at the meeting other than the 
election of directors and the ratification of the appointment of Haskell & White LLP.  If, however, any other 
matter shall properly come before the meeting, the persons named in the proxy accompanying this statement 
will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies with respect thereto in accordance with their best judgment. 

The annual report of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 29, 2004 accompanies this Proxy 

Statement but is not a part of the proxy solicitation material. 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

                                        By order of the Board of Directors 

        William L. Bridgford 

                                        President and Secretary 
February 7, 2005 

The Corporation will furnish without charge to each person whose proxy is being solicited, upon request of any such 
person, a copy of the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 29, 2004, as filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including financial statements and schedules thereto.  Such report was 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2005.  Requests for copies of such report should be 
directed to the Treasurer, Bridgford Foods Corporation, P.O. Box 3773, Anaheim, California 92803.   

FORM 10-K 

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:2)(cid:7)(cid:1)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Directors

Allan L. Bridgford
Chairman

Hugh Wm. Bridgford
Vice President

William L. Bridgford
President

Paul A. Gilbert
Senior Vice President,
Smith Barney Citigroup

Richard A. Foster
Retired (formerly
President, Interstate
Electronics Corporation)

Robert E. Schulze
Retired (formerly President
and member of the Executive Committee, 
Bridgford Foods Corporation)

Paul R. Zippwald

Retired (formerly Regional Vice President, 

Bank of America)

Todd C. Andrews
Vice President and Controller, 
Public Storage, Inc.

Officers

Allan L. Bridgford
Chairman, Board of Directors and member 
of the Executive Committee

Hugh Wm. Bridgford
Chairman, Executive Committee
and Vice President

William L. Bridgford
President, Secretary, and member
of the Executive Committee

Bruce Bridgford
President, Bridgford Foods of California

Raymond F. Lancy
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer, and member of the Executive Committee

John V. Simmons
Vice President, President Frozen Food Division

Daniel R. Yost
Senior Vice President, Frozen Food Division

Chris Cole
Vice President

Cindy Matthews
Assistant Secretary