Bridgford Foods
Annual Report 2015

Plain-text annual report

297645_048-1277(cid:0)Annual(cid:0)Report(cid:0)01_R1_Layout(cid:0)1(cid:0) (cid:0)2/11/16(cid:0) (cid:0)3:04(cid:0)PM(cid:0) (cid:0)Page(cid:0)1 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 I 5 Notice of 20I6 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement Bridgford Foods Corporation 1308 North Patt Street P.O. Box 3773 Anaheim, California 92803 Phone (714) 526-5533 www.bridgford.com Transfer Agent and Registrar Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company 17 Battery Place, 8th Floor New York, NY 10004 1-800-509-5586 Major Operating Facilities Independent Accountants Chicago, Illinois Dallas, Texas Statesville, North Carolina Squar Milner LLP Newport Beach, California ©2016 Bridgford Foods Corp. YW 048-1277 297645_048-1277(cid:0)Annual(cid:0)Report(cid:0)01_R1_Layout(cid:0)1(cid:0) (cid:0)2/11/16(cid:0) (cid:0)3:04(cid:0)PM(cid:0) (cid:0)Page(cid:0)3 S Bridgford Foods is pleased to report greatly improved financial results during our 2015 R fiscal year. The challenges we faced during 2014 led us to re-evaluate our operations and E make some difficult but important changes, and those adjustments were rewarded with the D 4th best year in the Company’s 83-year history. As the year progressed, we benefited from L declining costs in many aspects of our business, and those lower costs plus the elimination of operations that had been a drain on our finances in prior years produced great results. Sales during our 2015 fiscal year were $130,448,000, a decrease of 2.2% from sales of $133,401,000 in 2014. Sales on continuing operations in 2015 were $130,448,000, an increase of 3.7% from sales of $125,747,000 on those same operations in 2014. The Company recorded a net profit before taxes of $8,118,000 on operations in 2015, equal to $0.89 per share. These positive results, combined with a favorable outlook for our future performance, resulted in a reversal of the tax valuation allowance imposed in 2008 in the amount of $10,848,000, combined with a tax provision of -$3,524,000, resulting in total net income for the year of $15,442,000. O H E R A H S R U O O T SALES AND MARKETING HIGHLIGHTS In our foodservice bread division, led by Senior Vice President Dan Yost, school feeding continues to be an important part of our marketing efforts. Our “Better For You” line of products enables schools to serve healthier, better tasting bread products to their students, as we strive to help Food Service Directors across the country meet the guidelines mandated by the United States Department of Agriculture while providing meals that kids will actually eat! We introduced both Maple- and Blueberry-Flavored White Whole Wheat Biscuits during the year, and have high hopes for their future success. A major fast food chain is testing our 4-ounce Single Serve Monkey Bites in their breakfast program, and the initial response has been very positive. In the retail arena, Walmart has been testing a twin-pack of our Monkey Bites in over 700 of their stores, and the success it has enjoyed has us optimistic that the distribution will be expanded in the future. Super Target recently authorized Bridgford Ready-Dough, Bridgford Parkerhouse Rolls, and Bridgford Monkey Bread for sale in their western division beginning in the Spring of 2016. We have also been supplying the biscuit component of entrees produced by Fra’Mani Handcrafted Foods for sale in Costco. Our retail Shelf-Stable Sandwich Twin-Packs achieved greatly increased distribution during the year. Some or all varieties are currently offered in all Cabela’s and Dick’s Sporting Goods outlets, and in over 2,200 Walmarts. Our shelf-stable sandwich business with European Union customers also improved in 2015, and while business with the U.S. military remained weak, we continue to work on the development of new items with military researchers at Natick Laboratories. Our Chicago Dry Sausage and Meat Snack Division continued to make solid inroads in the grocery segment of our business. Our Direct Store Delivery (DSD) route system is an important factor in that growth, due to the service and value it allows us to provide to our customers. New products introduced during the year included Summer Sausage & Crackers, Bridgford Sweet Baby Ray’s Honey Barbecue Beef Jerky, and Bridgford Bacon Jerky. The management of our marketing efforts is in very stable hands, with Corporate Vice President Chris Cole and Division Vice President Baron Bridgford II leading the team. The Company’s presence in the world of professional bass fishing increased significantly during the year. We are now represented by five premier anglers: Randy Blaukat, Matt Stefan, Luke Clausen, Joe Uribe Jr., and Chad Randles, all of whom compete primarily in FLW (Fishing League Worldwide) events. In addition to their success on the water, these gentlemen are all first- class guys and great representatives for our brand and our products, and we are proud to have them on the Bridgford Foods team. OPERATIONS Though the 2015 fiscal year began with very high commodity costs, prices for meat, flour and fuel declined for the most part as the year progressed. Under the direction of Baron R.H. Bridgford, President of Bridgford Foods of Illinois, our Dry Sausage and Meat Snacks Division made great improvements to the processes we employ to produce our beef jerky, and we truly believe that we are currently making the most tender, consistent and flavorful jerky in the world. Our Pepperoni, Summer Sausage and other dry sausage products also proudly carry our designation as “The Premium Brand”, and command a higher price in the marketplace than our competition. Our team of managers in the frozen food division, Monty Griffith in Statesville, Jeff Robinson in Anaheim, Blaine Bridgford at Superior Foods in Dallas, and Joe deAlcuaz at Frozen-Rite, are simply the best. As a result of the success of our various Monkey Bread products, we are evaluating options to increase our production capacity in this area. We are eliminating some low-margin items at our Superior plant to provide more production hours, but we are also studying ways to add Monkey Bread production at our other locations. Director Bruce Bridgford has done a stellar job of leading our efforts to reduce our freight expenses, and the savings we have achieved in this area since he took on that role two years ago are significant. S R O T C E R I D Todd C. Andrews Vice President and Controller, Public Storage, Inc. Allan L. Bridgford, Jr. Consultant (Formerly President of Bridgford Foods of Illinois) Bruce H. Bridgford Vice President William L. Bridgford Chairman Raymond F. Lancy Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and member of the Executive Committee D. Gregory Scott Managing Director, Peak Holdings, LLC John Simmons President Paul R. Zippwald Retired (formerly Regional Vice President, Bank of America) S R E C I F F O Allan L. Bridgford Vice President and member of the Executive Committee Bruce H. Bridgford Vice President Hugh Wm. Bridgford Chairman of the Executive Committee and Vice President Michael Bridgford Assistant Secretary William L. Bridgford Chairman and member of the Executive Committee Chris Cole Vice President Joe deAlcuaz Vice President Manufacturing Bob Delong Vice President, Information Technologies Raymond F. Lancy Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and member of the Executive Committee Cindy Matthews–Morales Corporate Secretary and Controller John V. Simmons President and member of the Executive Committee Daniel R. Yost Senior Vice President S R E G A N A M N O I S I V I D Baron R. H. Bridgford President, Bridgford Processing Company of Illinois Bridgford Foods of Illinois Blaine K. Bridgford President Dallas- Superior Foods Division Bruce H. Bridgford Chairman & President, Bridgford Foods of California Joseph deAlcuaz Vice President Dallas- Frozen-Rite Division Monty Griffith Vice President Bridgford Foods of North Carolina Jeffrey D. Robinson Bakery Manager Anaheim- Bread Division Bridgford Pro Angling Team Discontinuing our Western Deli processing and distribution operations at the close of the 2014 fiscal year left us with an underutilized plant in Anaheim, and we decided to offer storage space to other businesses to generate additional income. It took most of the 2015 year to find suitable, compatible tenants, but we are now approaching capacity and bringing in steady revenues to complement our continuing bakery operations. In today’s constantly changing technology-driven world, staying up-to-date is a never-ending challenge, and we’d like to recognize Vice President for Information Technology Bob Delong for his dedication (and patience!) in keeping us up to speed both collectively and individually. FINANCIAL MATTERS Our working capital totaled $26,546,000 at October 30, 2015, $8,686,000 (48.6%) higher than at the beginning of the fiscal year, and our working capital ratio increased to 2.9 to 1 at October 30, 2015, compared to 2.2 to 1 at October 31, 2014. The increase in working capital resulted from lower payments for meat commodities, increased profitability and reestablishing our deferred tax assets. We repurchased 33,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in the amount of $283,000 ($8.58 average price paid per share) during 2015. Projected contributions totaling $1,150,000 were recorded as a current liability related to our defined benefit pension plan at October 30, 2015, and we contributed a total of $1,157,000 toward this plan during the 2015 fiscal year. The defined benefit plan was frozen in the 3rd quarter of 2006 and replaced with a 401(k) defined contribution plan. The Company paid $798,000 related to the Company’s withdrawal from the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan during fiscal 2015. We maintain a line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank in the amount of $4,000,000 which expires March 1, 2016. The Company did not borrow under this line of credit during fiscal 2015 and had no borrowings outstanding as of October 30, 2015. Shareholders’ equity totaled $35,645,000, an increase of $10,395,000 (41.2%) compared to the end of the prior year. The reversal of the tax valuation allowance, as mentioned above, coupled with net income from operations of $8,118,000, were the most significant components of this change. Our frozen defined benefit pension recognized a loss of $4,665,000 in Shareholders’ equity. This loss resulted from a change in the mortality tables used by our actuaries and lower than expected investment returns on our pension assets partially offset by an increase in the Citigroup Pension Liability Index from 4.05% in fiscal year 2014 to 4.15% in fiscal year 2015. This rate is used to compute the present value of our defined benefit pension obligations. Approximately 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock remain available for repurchase under the 2 million share repurchase plan previously authorized by the Board of Directors. Shareholders’ equity per share was $3.92 at October 30, 2015 compared to $2.77 at October 31, 2014. Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2015. We believe our control systems remain effective. Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting is included in the Form 10-K report. No significant weaknesses in internal accounting control, to the extent identified, were unresolved at the conclusion of the 2015 fiscal year. Our accounting and financial reporting team, led by Corporate Secretary and Controller Cindy Matthews-Morales, did a fantastic job working with a downsized and reorganized staff to continue to provide timely and accurate information to help us run our business profitably. SUMMARY As we begin 2016, we expect many of the trends that benefited us in 2015 to continue. While the price of pork dropped dramatically during the past year from the record highs achieved in 2014, beef prices only recently began to soften, and that gradual trend is expected to continue for the next couple of years. Flour and fuel costs also show no indication of a dramatic strengthening in the near term. The cessation of two unprofitable operations in 2014 did provide the relief we expected. Our workforce got very lean as 2014 played out, and we intend to keep it that way. As we stated in last year’s letter, tough times bring out the best in tough organizations; in many ways we have grown and benefited as a result of that disappointing year, and we’re determined to keep moving forward without repeating the mistakes of the past. Our mission remains the same: to be resilient, to be the best, to be profitable, and to enjoy doing it. We appreciate the efforts of our employees, the loyalty of our customers, and the support of our suppliers, partners and other associates as we battled our way back during the 2015 year, and we are excited about our prospects for 2016. Over our history, we’ve been fortunate to enjoy the contributions of many long-tenured associates, and one such person is Lorene Salcido, who was a key part of our team for over 41 years and a major contributor to these annual reports for most of those years. Please join us in congratulating Lorene on her recent retirement, and wishing her well in the years to come! Similarly, Paul Zippwald will be stepping down from our Board of Directors in March of 2016, and we’d like to thank him for almost a quarter-century of friendship, sage advice and rock-solid support. Respectfully, January 16, 2015 William L. Bridgford Chairman John V. Simmons President Raymond F. Lancy Chief Financial Officer SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended October 30, 2015 Commission file number: 0-2396 BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) California (State of incorporation) 95-1778176 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1308 North Patt Street Anaheim, California 92801 (Address of principal executive offices) (714) 526-5533 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on April 17, 2015 was $13,672,000. As of January 11, 2016, there were 9,079,019 shares of common stock outstanding. Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held March 9, 2016 are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10-14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. INDEX TO FORM 10K PART I Item 1. Business Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Item 2. Properties Item 3. Legal Proceedings Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Item 6. Selected Financial Data Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Executive Compensation Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules SIGNATURES Page 3 3 7 9 9 9 9 10 10 11 12 17 17 17 18 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 22 2 Item 1. Business PART I This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Bridgford Foods Corporation intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. Readers are cautioned that such statements, which may be identified by words including “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “expects,” and similar expressions, are only predictions or estimations and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following: general economic and business conditions; the impact of competitive product and pricing; success of operating initiatives; development and operating costs; advertising and promotional efforts; adverse publicity; acceptance of new product offerings; consumer trial and frequency; changes in business strategy or development plans; availability, terms and deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; commodity, labor, and employee benefit costs; changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations; weather conditions; construction schedules; and other factors referenced in this Report. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions regarding our business, which involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic and competitive conditions, and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward- looking statements. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as representation by us or any other person that the objectives or plans of our company will be achieved. The forward-looking statements contained herein speak as of the date of this Report and we undertake no obligation to update such statements after the date hereof. Background of Business Bridgford Foods Corporation (collectively with its subsidiaries, “Bridgford”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”), a California corporation, was organized in 1952. We originally began operations in 1932 as a retail meat market in San Diego, California and evolved into a meat wholesaler for hotels and restaurants, a distributor of frozen food products, a processor and packer of meat, and a manufacturer and distributor of frozen food products for sale on a retail and wholesale basis. For more than the past five years we and our subsidiaries have been primarily engaged in the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of an extensive line of frozen and snack food products throughout the United States. Bridgford Foods Corporation has not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership, or similar proceedings since inception nor have we been party to any merger, acquisition, etc. or acquired or disposed of any material amounts of assets during the past five years. Substantially all of our assets have been acquired in the ordinary course of business. Description of Business Bridgford Foods Corporation currently operates in two business segments - the processing and distribution of frozen products and the processing and distribution of snack food products. For information regarding the separate financial performance of the business segments refer to Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table shows sales, as a percentage of consolidated sales, for each business segment during the last two fiscal years: Frozen Food Products Snack Food Products Refrigerated Food Products (Discontinued) 2015 2014 39 % 61 % - % 100 % 38 % 57 % 5 % 100 % We manufacture and distribute an extensive line of food products, including biscuits, bread dough items, roll dough items, dry sausage products and beef jerky. Through the end of fiscal 2014, our direct store delivery network consisted of two separate divisions, refrigerated and non-refrigerated snack food products. Refrigerated snack food products were distributed through eight different regions located in the southwest, primarily operating in California, Arizona and Nevada. By the end of fiscal 2014, we ceased refrigerated snack food product distribution because of continued net losses. Our frozen food products division serves both 3 food service and retail customers. Approximately 160 unique frozen food products are sold through wholesalers, cooperatives, and distributors to approximately 21,000 retail outlets and 23,000 restaurants and institutions. Products manufactured, processed or packaged by Bridgford Products manufactured or processed by third parties for distribution 2015 2014 100 % - % 100 % 96 % 4 % 100 % Although we have recently introduced several new products, most of these products have not contributed significantly to our revenue growth for the 2015 fiscal year. Our sales are not subject to material seasonal variations. Historically we have been able to respond quickly to the receipt of orders and, accordingly, do not maintain a significant sales backlog. Bridgford Foods Corporation and its industry generally have no unusual demands or restrictions on working capital items. During the last fiscal year we did not enter into any new markets or any significant contractual or other material relationships. Availability of SEC Filings and Code of Conduct on Internet Website We maintain an Internet website at http://www.bridgford.com. Available on this website, free of charge, are annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and reports filed under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Code of Conduct is also available on the website. Product Distribution Methods Our products are delivered to customers using several distinct distribution channels. The distribution channel utilized is dependent upon the needs of our customers, the most efficient proximity to the delivery point, trade customs, operating segment as well as product type, life and stability. Among our customers are many of the country’s largest broadline and specialty food service distributors. These and other large end purchasers occasionally go through extensive qualification procedures and our manufacturing capabilities are subjected to thorough review by the end purchasers prior to our approval as a vendor. Large end purchasers typically select suppliers that can consistently meet increased volume requirements on a national basis during peak promotional periods. We believe that our manufacturing flexibility, national presence, and long-standing customer relationships should allow us to compete effectively with other manufacturers seeking to provide similar products to our current large food service end purchasers, although no assurances can be given. The factors that contribute to higher or lower margins generated from each method of distribution depend upon the accepted selling price, level of involvement by our employees in setting up and maintaining displays, distance traveled and fuel consumed by our company-owned fleet as well as freight and shipping costs depending on the distance the product travels to the delivery point. Management is continually evaluating the profitability of product delivery methods, analyzing alternate methods and weighing economic inputs to determine the most efficient and cost effective method of delivery to fulfill the needs of our customers. Major Product Classes Frozen Food Products Our frozen food products division serves both food service and retail customers. Approximately 160 unique frozen food products are sold through wholesalers, cooperatives, and distributors to approximately 21,000 retail outlets and 23,000 restaurants and institutions. Frozen Food Products – Food Service Customers The food service industry is composed of establishments that serve food outside the home and includes restaurants, the food operations of health care providers, schools, hotels, resorts, corporations, and other traditional and non-traditional food service outlets. Growth in this industry has been driven by the increase in away-from-home meal preparation, which has accompanied the expanding number of both dual income and single-parent households. Another trend within the food service industry is the growth in the number of non-traditional food service outlets such as convenience stores, retail stores, and supermarkets. These non- traditional locations often lack extensive cooking, storage, or preparation facilities resulting in a need for pre-cooked and prepared foods similar to those we provide. The expansion in the food service industry has also been accompanied by the continued consolidation and growth of broadline and specialty food service distributors, many of which are long-standing customers. 4  Frozen Food Products – Retail Customers The majority of our existing and targeted retail customers are involved in the resale of branded and private label packaged foods. The same trends which have contributed to the increase in away-from-home meal preparation have also fueled the growth in easy to prepare, microwaveable frozen and refrigerated convenience foods. Among the fastest growing segments is the frozen and refrigerated hand-held foods market. This growth has been driven by improved product quality and variety and the increasing need for inexpensive and healthy food items that require minimal preparation. Despite rapid growth, many categories of frozen and refrigerated hand-held foods have achieved minimal household penetration. We believe we have been successful in establishing and maintaining supply relationships with certain selected leading retailers in this market. Frozen Food Products – Sales and Marketing Our frozen food business covers the United States. Products produced by the Frozen Food Products segment are generally supplied to food service and retail distributors who take title to the product upon shipment receipt through company leased long- haul vehicles. In addition to regional sales managers, we maintain a network of independent food service and retail brokers covering most of the United States. Brokers are compensated on a commission basis. We believe that our broker relationships, in close cooperation with our regional sales managers, are a valuable asset providing significant new product and customer opportunities. Regional sales managers perform several significant functions for us, including identifying and developing new business opportunities and providing customer service and support to our distributors and end purchasers through the effective use of our broker network. Our annual advertising expenditures are directed towards retail and institutional customers. These customers participate in various special promotional and marketing programs and direct advertising allowances we sponsor. We also invest in general consumer advertising in various newspapers and periodicals including free standing inserts and coupons to advertise in major markets. We direct advertising toward food service customers with campaigns in major industry publications and through our participation in trade shows throughout the United States. Our advertising strategy includes our presence on social media and online distribution of promotional material. Snack Food Products During fiscal 2015, our snack food products division sold approximately 90 different items through customer owned distribution centers and a direct store delivery network serving approximately 15,000 supermarkets, mass merchandise and convenience retail stores located in 49 states. By the end of fiscal 2014, we ceased our route distribution operations in Canada as a cost cutting measure to concentrate on our core route business in the United States in addition to ceasing distribution of refrigerated deli food division because of continued losses. Products produced or distributed by the Snack Food Products segment are supplied to customers through either direct delivery to customer warehouses or direct-store-delivery to retail locations. We utilize customer managed warehouse distribution centers to lower distribution cost. Product delivered to the customer’s warehouse is then distributed to the store where it is resold to the end consumer. Our direct-store-delivery system focus emphasizes high quality service of our premium branded product to our customers. We also provide the service of setting up and maintaining the display and restocking our products. Snack Food Products — Customers Our customers are comprised of large retail chains and smaller “independent” operators. This part of our business is highly competitive. Proper placement of our product lines is critical to selling success since most items could be considered “impulse” items which are often consumed shortly after purchase. Our ability to sell successfully to this distribution channel depends on aggressive marketing and maintaining relationships with key buyers. Snack Food Products — Sales and Marketing Snack food products are distributed across the United States. Regional sales managers perform several significant functions including identifying and developing new business opportunities and providing customer service and support to our customers. We also utilize the services of brokers, where appropriate, to support efficient product distribution and customer satisfaction. 5 Product Planning and Research and Development We continually monitor the consumer acceptance of each product within our extensive product line. Individual products are regularly added to and deleted from our product line. Historically, the addition or deletion of any individual product has not had a material effect on our operations in the current fiscal year. We believe that a key factor in the success of our products is our system of carefully targeted research and testing of our products to ensure high quality and that each product matches an identified market opportunity. The emphasis in new product introductions in the past several years has been in single service items. We are constantly searching to develop new products to complement our existing product lines and improve processing techniques and formulas. We utilize an in-house test kitchen and consultants to research and experiment with unique food preparation methods, improve quality control and analyze new ingredient mixtures. Competition Our products are sold under highly competitive conditions. All food products can be considered competitive with other food products, but we consider our principal competitors to include national, regional and local producers and distributors of refrigerated, frozen and non-refrigerated snack food products. Several of our competitors include large companies with substantially greater financial and marketing resources than ours. Existing competitors may broaden their product lines and potential competitors may enter or increase their focus on our market, resulting in greater competition for us. We believe that our products compete favorably with those of our competitors. Such competitors’ products compete against ours for retail shelf space, institutional distribution and customer preference. Effect of Government Regulations Our operations are subject to extensive inspection and regulation by the United States Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”), the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), and by other federal, state, and local authorities regarding the processing, packaging, storage, transportation, distribution, and labeling of products that we manufacture, produce and process. Our processing facilities and products are subject to continuous inspection by the USDA and/or other federal, state, and local authorities. The USDA has issued strict regulations concerning the control of listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meat and poultry products and contamination by food borne pathogens such as E. coli and salmonella, and implemented a system of regulation known as the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (“HACCP”) program. The HACCP program requires all meat and poultry processing plants to develop and implement sanitary operating procedures and other program requirements. We believe that we are currently in compliance with governmental laws and regulations and that we maintain the necessary permits and licenses relating to our meat operations. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") oversees safety compliance and establishes certain employer responsibilities to help "assure safe and healthful working conditions" and keep the workplace free of recognized hazards or practices likely to cause death or serious injury. Failure to comply with regulations of OSHA could adversely affect our results of operations. To date, federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, have not had a material effect on our business. Importance of Key Customers Sales to Wal-Mart® comprised 31.4% of revenues in fiscal 2015 and 42.6% of total accounts receivable was due from Wal- Mart® at October 30, 2015. Sales to Wal-Mart® comprised 28.8% of revenues in fiscal 2014 and 31.8% of total accounts receivable was due from Wal-Mart® at October 31, 2014. Sources and Availability of Raw Materials We purchase large quantities of pork, beef, and flour. These ingredients are generally available from a number of different suppliers although the availability of these ingredients is subject to seasonal variation. We build ingredient inventories to take advantage of downward trends in seasonal prices or anticipated supply limitations. Most flour purchases are made at market price without contracts. We also purchases bulk flour under short-term fixed price contracts at current market prices. The contracts are usually effective for a month or less and are not material to our operations. These contracts are settled within a month’s time and no significant contracts remain open at the close of the reporting 6 period. We monitor and manage our ingredient costs to help negate volatile daily swings in market prices when possible. We do not participate in the commodity futures market or hedging to limit commodity exposure. Employees We had 507 employees at October 30, 2015, approximately 38% of whose employment relationship is governed by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements currently expire between February 2016 and March 2017. We believe that our relationship with all of our employees is favorable and contracts will be settled favorably. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we closed the refrigerated snack food products division and withdrew from the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan, terminating approximately 44 employees. Executive Officers of the Registrant The names, ages, and positions of all our executive officers as of January 15, 2016 are listed below. Messrs. Hugh Wm. Bridgford and Allan L. Bridgford are brothers. William L. Bridgford is the son of Hugh Wm. Bridgford and the nephew of Allan L. Bridgford. Officers are normally appointed annually by the board of directors at their meeting immediately following the annual meeting of shareholders. Three executive officers are full-time employees of our company, Allan L. Bridgford and Hugh Wm Bridgford worked 60% of full time and Allan L. Bridgford worked 50% of full time during fiscal 2015. Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Item 1A. Risk Factors Position(s) with our company Vice President and member of the Executive Committee Vice President and Chairman of the Executive Committee Chairman and member of the Executive Committee President and member of the Executive Committee Age 80 84 61 60 62 Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and member of the Executive Committee In addition to the other matters set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the continuing operations and the price of our common stock are subject to the following risks, each of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The risks described below are only the risks that we currently believe are material to our business. However, additional risks not presently known, or risks that are currently believed to be immaterial, may also impair our business operations. We are subject to general risks in the food industry, including, among other things, risk relating to changes in consumer preferences and product contamination as well as general economic conditions, any of which risks, if realized, could negatively impact our operating results and financial position. The food industry, and the markets within the food industry in which we compete, are subject to various risks, including the following: evolving consumer preferences, nutritional and health-related concerns, federal, state and local food inspection and processing controls, consumer product liability claims, risks of product tampering, and the availability and expense of liability insurance. The meat and poultry industries are subject to scrutiny due to the association of meat and poultry products with recent outbreaks of illness, and on rare occasions even death, caused by food borne pathogens. Product recalls are sometimes required in the food industry to withdraw contaminated or mislabeled products from the market. Additionally, the failure to identify and react appropriately to changes in consumer trends, demands and preferences could lead to, among other things, reduced demand and price reduction for our products. Further, we may be adversely affected by changes in domestic or foreign economic conditions, including inflation or deflation, interest rates, availability of capital markets, consumer spending rates, and energy availability and costs (including fuel surcharges). These and other general risks related to the food industry, if realized by us, could have a significant adverse effect on demand for our products, as well as the costs and availability of raw materials, ingredients and packaging materials, thereby negatively affecting our operating results and financial position. Fluctuations in the prices that we pay for raw materials could negatively impact our financial results. We purchase large quantities of commodity pork, beef, and flour. Historically, market prices for products we process have fluctuated in response to a number of factors, including changes in the United States government farm support programs, changes in international agricultural and trading policies, weather, and other conditions during the growing and harvesting seasons. Our operating results are heavily dependent upon the prices paid for raw materials. The marketing of our value-added products does not lend itself to instantaneous changes in selling prices. Changes in selling prices are relatively infrequent and do not compare with the volatility of commodity markets. While fluctuations in significant cost structure components, such as ingredient 7 commodities and fuel prices, have had a significant impact on profitability over the last three years, the impact of general price inflation on our financial position and results of operations has not been significant. Future volatility of general price inflation or deflation and raw material cost and availability could adversely affect our financial results. We are subject to extensive government regulations and a failure to comply with such regulations could negatively impact our financial results. Our operations are subject to extensive inspection and regulation by the United States Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”), the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), and by other federal, state, and local authorities regarding the processing, packaging, storage, transportation, distribution, and labeling of products that are manufactured, produced and processed by us. Our processing facilities and products are subject to continuous inspection by the USDA and/or other federal, state, and local authorities. The USDA has issued strict policies concerning the control of listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meat and poultry products and contamination by food borne pathogens such as E. coli and salmonella, and established a system of regulation known as the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (“HACCP”) program. The HACCP program requires all meat and poultry processing plants to develop and implement sanitary operating procedures and other program requirements. We believe that we are currently in compliance with governmental laws and regulations and that we maintain necessary permits and licenses relating to our meat operations. A failure to obtain or a loss of necessary permits and licenses could delay or prevent us from meeting current product demand and could adversely affect our operating performance. Furthermore, we are routinely subject to new or modified laws, regulations and accounting standards. If found to be out of compliance with applicable laws and regulations in these or other areas, we could be subject to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls, or asset seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, any of which could have a significant adverse effect on our financial results. We depend on our key management, the loss of which could negatively impact our operations. Our executive officers and certain other key employees have been primarily responsible for the development and expansion of our business, and the loss of the services of one or more of these individuals could adversely affect us. Our success will be dependent in part upon our continued ability to recruit, motivate, and retain qualified personnel. We cannot assure that we will be successful in this regard. We have no employment or non-competition agreements with key personnel. We depend on our major customers and any loss of such customers could have a negative impact on our profitability. We could suffer significant reductions in revenues and operating incomes if we lost one or more of our largest customers, including Wal-Mart®, which accounted for 31.4% of sales in fiscal year 2015. Many of our customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs, and food distributors have consolidated in recent years. Such consolidation has produced large, sophisticated customers with increased buying power who are more capable of operating with reduced inventories while demanding lower pricing and increased promotional programs. These customers also may use their shelf space for their own private label products. Failure to respond to these trends could reduce our volume and cause us to lower prices or increase promotional spending for our product lines which could adversely affect our profitability. With more than 80% concentration of beneficial ownership of our stock held by the Bridgford family, there are risks that they can exert significant influence or control over our corporate matters. Members of the Bridgford family beneficially own, in the aggregate, more than 80% of our outstanding stock. In addition, three members of the Bridgford family currently serve on the Board of Directors. As a result, members of the Bridgford family have the ability to exert substantial influence or actual control over our management and affairs and over substantially all matters requiring action by our shareholders, including amendments to by-laws, election and removal of directors, any proposed merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may also delay or prevent a change in control otherwise favored by our other shareholders and could depress our stock price. Additionally, as a result of the Bridgford family’s significant ownership of the outstanding voting stock, we have relied on the “controlled company” exemption from certain corporate governance requirements of the NASDAQ stock market. Therefore, among other things, we have elected not to implement the rule that provides for a nominating committee to identify and recommend nominees to the Board of Directors and have instead elected to have the full Board of Directors perform such function. Additionally, pursuant to this exemption, our compensation committee, which is made up of independent directors, does not have sole authority to determine the compensation of our executive officers, including our Chairman of the Board. 8 We participate in Multiemployer Pension Plans which could negatively impact our operations and profitability. We participate in “multiemployer” pension plans administered by labor unions on behalf of their employees. We pay union dues monthly, a portion of which is used to fund pension benefit obligations to plan participants. The contribution amount may change depending upon the ability of participating companies to fund these pension liabilities as well as the actual and expected returns on pension plan assets. Should we withdraw from the union and cease participation in a union plan, federal law could impose a penalty for additional contributions to the plan. The penalty would be recorded as an expense in the consolidated statement of operations. The ultimate amount of the withdrawal liability is dependent upon several factors including the funded status of the plan and contributions made by other participating companies. During fiscal 2014, we withdrew from the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan and recorded an estimated pension expense and a corresponding non-current liability of $798,000 related to this plan. The amount recorded was paid in October 2015. We continue to participate in other multiemployer union plans. In the event of a full or partial withdrawal from these plans, the impact to our financial statements could be material. Eminent domain and land risk regulations could negatively impact our financial results and financial position. We own real property on which we operate our processing and/or our distribution operations. As is the case with any owner of real property, we may be subject to eminent domain proceedings that can impact the value of investments we have made in real property as well as potentially disrupt our business operations. If subject to eminent domain proceedings or other government takings we may not be adequately compensated. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Not applicable. Item 2. Properties We own the following properties: Property Location Anaheim, California * Dallas, Texas * Dallas, Texas * Dallas, Texas * Dallas, Texas * Statesville, North Carolina * Chicago, Illinois ** Building Square Footage Acreage 100,000 94,000 30,000 16,000 3,200 42,000 156,000 5.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 1.5 8.0 1.5 * - property used by Frozen Food Products Segment ** - property used by Snack Products Food Segment We utilize the foregoing properties for processing, warehousing, distributing and administrative purposes. We also lease warehouse and/or office facilities throughout the United States and Canada through month-to-month rental agreements. We believe that our properties are generally adequate to satisfy our foreseeable needs. Additional properties may be acquired and/or plants expanded if favorable opportunities and conditions arise. Item 3. Legal Proceedings No material legal proceedings were pending against us at October 30, 2015 or as of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are likely to be subject to claims arising from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. In certain of such actions, plaintiffs may request punitive or other damages that may not be covered by insurance and, accordingly, no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of any such possible future claims or litigation or their effect on us. Any adverse litigation trends and outcomes could significantly and negatively affect our financial results. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. 9 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Common Stock and Dividend Data Our common stock is traded in the national over-the-counter market and is authorized for quotation on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “BRID”. The following table reflects the high and low closing sale prices reported by Nasdaq as well as cash dividends paid for each of the last eight fiscal quarters. Fiscal Year 2015 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2014 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter High $ $ $ $ High $ $ $ $ Low 8.35 $ 8.65 $ 10.81 $ 10.95 $ Low 10.16 $ 10.20 $ 10.00 $ 8.58 $ Cash Dividends Paid 7.01 $ 7.50 $ 7.38 $ 8.06 $ Cash Dividends Paid 9.36 $ 9.55 $ 7.79 $ 7.77 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 On January 11, 2016, the closing sale price for our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market was $9.57 per share. As of January 11, 2016, there were 774 shareholders of record in our common stock. The payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon future earnings, financial requirements, and other factors. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities During the period covered by this Report we did not sell or issue any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Repurchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer During fiscal year 2015, we repurchased an aggregate of 33,132 shares of our common stock for $282,540 pursuant to our repurchase plan previously authorized by the Board of Directors. The following table provides information regarding our repurchases of common stock in each of the four periods comprising the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015. Period (1) July 11, 2015 – August 7, 2015 August 8, 2015 – September 4, 2015 September 5, 2015 – October 2, 2015 October 3, 2015 – October 30, 2015 Total Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) 132,267 130,377 127,191 124,568 699 1,890 3,186 2,623 8,398 699 $ 1,890 3,186 2,623 8,398 $ 9.43 8.67 9.30 9.25 9.16 10 (1) The periods shown are our fiscal periods during the sixteen-week quarter ended October 30, 2015. (2) All repurchases reflected in the foregoing table were made on the open market. Our stock repurchase program was approved by the Board of Directors in November 1999 (1,500,000 shares authorized, disclosed in a Form 10-K filed on January 26, 2000) and was expanded in June 2005 (500,000 additional shares authorized, disclosed in a press release and Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2005). Under the stock repurchase program, we are authorized, at the discretion of management and the Board of Directors, to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock on the open market. Our Stock Purchase Plan (“Purchase Plan”) is administered by Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”) for purchase of shares of common stock (“Stock”) issued by us in compliance with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Commencing on October 15, 2015 and continuing through and including October 14, 2016, CGM shall act as our exclusive agent to purchase Stock under the Purchase Plan. This Purchase Plan supplements any purchases of stock by us “outside” of the Purchase Plan, which may occur from time to time, in open market transactions pursuant to Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. The daily purchase quantity is defined as a number of shares up to, but not to exceed, each day’s applicable Rule 10b-18 maximum volume limit (i.e. 25% of the prior four calendar weeks’ average daily trading volume); however, once per week a block of stock may be purchased that exceeds the Rule 10b-18 average daily trading volume condition, provided that no other Purchase Plan purchases are made on any day on which such a block is purchased. As of October 30, 2015, the total maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the Purchase Plan is 124,568 at a purchase price not to exceed $10.00 per share for a total maximum aggregate price (exclusive of commission) of $1,245,680. Item 6. Selected Financial Data Not applicable to smaller reporting company. 11 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations For a complete understanding, this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report. Certain statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Bridgford Foods Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing; success of operating initiatives; development and operating costs; advertising and promotional efforts; adverse publicity; acceptance of new product offerings; consumer trial and frequency; changes in business strategy or development plans; availability, terms and deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; commodity, labor, and employee benefit costs; changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations; weather conditions; construction schedules; and other factors referenced in this Report. Results of Operations (in thousands except percentages) Fiscal Year Ended October 30, 2015 (52 weeks) Compared to Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2014 (52 weeks) Net Sales-Consolidated Net sales in fiscal 2015 decreased $2,953 (2.2%) when compared to the prior year. The changes in net sales were comprised as follows: Impact on Net Sales-Consolidated Selling price per pound Unit sales volume in pounds Returns activity Promotional activity Increase in net sales – Continuing operations Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division Decrease in net sales Net Sales-Frozen Food Products Segment % $ 8.8 -7.9 1.3 1.5 3.7 -5.9 -2.2 12,440 (11,189 ) 1,834 2,215 5,300 (8,253 ) (2,953 ) Net sales in the Frozen Food Products segment in fiscal 2015 decreased $191 (0.4%) compared to the prior year. The changes in net sales were comprised as follows: Impact on Net Sales-Frozen Food Products Selling price per pound Unit sales volume in pounds Returns activity Promotional activity Decrease in net sales % $ -0.9 -2.2 -0.1 2.8 -0.4 (528 ) (1,269 ) (60 ) 1,666 (191 ) The decrease in net sales in fiscal 2015 was attributable to lower sales volumes. Selling prices per pound remained essentially unchanged from the prior year. The majority of the volume decrease took place in the biscuit category while rolls, sheet dough, monkey bread and shelf-stable categories increased slightly. Returns activity also increased slightly. Lower promotional activity due to recent favorable spending trends compared to fiscal year 2014 helped mitigate the decline in net sales. 12 Net Sales-Snack Food Products Segment Net sales, excluding intersegment sales, in the Snack Food Products segment in fiscal 2015 decreased $2,762 (3.3%) compared to the prior year. The changes in net sales were comprised as follows: Impact on Net Sales-Snack Food Products Selling price per pound Unit sales volume in pounds Returns activity Promotional activity Continuing operations - Increase in net sales Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division Total - Decrease in net sales % $ 15.4 -11.8 2.2 0.5 6.3 -9.6 -3.3 12,968 (9,920 ) 1,894 549 5,491 (8,253 ) (2,762 ) As noted above, net sales, excluding intersegment sales and discontinued operations, in the Snack Food Products segment in fiscal 2015 increased $5,491 (6.3%) compared to the prior year. The increase in net sales from continuing operations in fiscal 2015 was attributable to higher selling prices per pound partially offset by lower unit sales volume. The increase in selling prices per pound was mainly due to price increases instituted during the year and a sales mix trend favoring higher value beef products. Total beef based product sales volume was essentially flat during the year while sales of pork based products comprised the majority of the volume decrease. The volume decrease related to a significant promotion in FY 2014 that was not repeated in FY 2015 and the de- emphasis of lower margin items. Returns and promotional activity were lower than the prior year period due to the program mentioned above. At the end of fiscal 2014, we discontinued operation of our Refrigerated Deli Products Division and ceased refrigerated snack food product distribution because of continued net losses. The reduction in sales from the discontinued operation offset the increase in sales from continuing operations. Cost of Products Sold and Gross Margin-Consolidated Cost of products sold from continuing operations decreased by $6,907 (7.3%) compared to the prior year. Overhead spending decreased due to a significant reduction in workers’ compensation, facility repairs and utility costs. The Company's workers' compensation benefits cost decreased due to favorable trends in claims experience in the current fiscal year. In addition, workers’ compensation benefits cost decreased by an additional $554 due to a change in accounting method to estimate future liabilities. Increases in meat commodity costs year to date partially offset the decrease in cost of products sold as described in the segment analysis below. The gross margin increased from 29.0% to 35.9%. Change in Cost of Products Sold by Segment Frozen Food Products Segment Snack Food Products Segment Continuing operations Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division Total $ % (1,418 ) (5,489 ) (6,907 ) (4,258 ) (11,165 ) Commodity $ (Decrease) Increase -1.5 -5.8 -7.3 -4.5 -11.8 (511 ) 1,039 528 - 528 Cost of Products Sold and Gross Margin–Frozen Food Products Segment Cost of products sold in the Frozen Food Products segment decreased by $1,418 (4.5%) to $30,372 in the 2015 fiscal year compared to the prior year. Lower unit volume and to a lesser extent lower flour commodity costs of approximately $511 were the primary contributing factors to this decrease. The gross margin percentage increased from 37.3% to 39.9% during fiscal year 2015 compared to the prior fiscal year. Cost of Products Sold and Gross Margin–Snack Food Products Segment Cost of products sold in the Snack Food Products segment decreased by $5,489 (5.8%) compared to the prior year. Cost of products sold was significantly reduced due to lower pounds sold, lower workers’ compensation costs and lower utility costs. The cost of significant meat commodities increased approximately $1,039 during fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year. The gross margin earned in this segment increased from 23.8% to 33.4% in during fiscal year 2015 primarily as a result of price increases and a favorable change in product mix. 13 Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Consolidated Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") in fiscal 2015 decreased $4,338 (10.1%) when compared to the prior year. The decrease in this category did not directly correspond to the change in sales. The table below summarizes the primary expense variances in this category: Wages and bonus Product advertising Workers’ compensation Fuel Cash surrender value Outside consultants Vehicle repairs Healthcare Insurance Other SG&A Continuing operations - SG&A Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division Total 52 weeks ended October 30, 2015 October 31, 2014 Expense Increase (Decrease) $ $ 15,835 $ 3,064 (167 ) 1,485 (6 ) 1,163 525 2,271 997 13,584 38,751 - 38,751 $ 13,684 $ 4,008 585 2,146 (514 ) 1,516 751 2,048 797 13,067 38,088 5,001 43,089 $ 2,151 (944 ) (752 ) (661 ) 508 (354 ) (225 ) 223 200 517 663 (5,001 ) (4,338 ) Higher profits and profit sharing accruals resulted in increased wages and bonus in the fiscal 2015 fiscal year compared to the prior year. Costs for product advertising decreased during fiscal 2015 mainly as a result of lower sales and spending trends in the Frozen Food Products segment. Our workers' compensation benefits cost decreased due to a one-time gain of $125 on closing out older policy years. In addition, workers’ compensation benefits cost decreased by an additional $508 due to a change in accounting estimate to value future liabilities. The decrease in fuel expense was driven by per gallon fuel price decreases compared to the prior year as a result of lower cost trends in petroleum markets. The cash surrender value on life insurance policies decreased due to a decline in the value of underlying equities that support the policies compared to the prior year. Outside consulting costs decreased due to lower custom programming and human resource software processing costs. Vehicle repairs decreased due to the replacement of older fleet vehicles. Healthcare costs have increased due to recent unfavorable claim activity. Insurance expense increased due to unfavorable market conditions, higher coverage levels and unfavorable claims experience. The major components comprising the increase of “Other SG&A” expenses were increases in telephone expense, computer maintenance and outside storage. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Frozen Food Products Segment SG&A expenses in the Frozen Food Products segment decreased by $1,090 (6.9%) to $14,625 during fiscal year 2015 compared to the prior fiscal year. The overall decrease in SG&A expenses was mainly due to lower product advertising and lower workers’ compensation costs as described above. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses-Refrigerated and Snack Food Products Segment Snack Food Products Segment Discontinued Refrigerated Deli Products Division Total 52 weeks ended October 30, 2015 October 31, 2014 Expense Increase (Decrease) $ $ 24,126 $ - 24,126 $ 22,373 $ 5,001 27,374 $ 1,753 (5,001 ) (3,248 ) SG&A expenses in the Snack Food Products segment decreased by $3,248 (11.9%) to $24,126 during fiscal year 2015 compared to the prior fiscal year. Most of the decrease was due to the closure of the Refrigerated Deli Products Division at the end of fiscal 2014. 14 Income Taxes The effective income tax rate was -89.8% and 2.0% in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively. The 2015 tax benefit of $7,323 related primarily to reversal of the valuation allowance offset partially by income tax expense on book income. In fiscal year 2015, the effective income tax rate differed from the applicable mixed statutory rate of approximately 37.7% primarily due to the reversal of the entire valuation allowance of $10,848 (refer to Note 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) on our deferred tax assets. The 2014 tax benefit of $88 related to the reduction in liability on unrecognized benefits related to research and development tax credits being carried forward due to utilization of a net operating loss. ASC 740 requires that an entity's deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent its management determines that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax asset, or portion thereof, will not be realized. Management evaluated the realizability of its deferred tax assets to determine the need and appropriateness of a valuation allowance. In its determinations, Management considers items of evidence, both positive and negative, including those items outlined in ASC 740. The Company policy outlines measurable objective criteria that must be met before a release of the valuation allowance will occur. The three criteria set forth in the policy must all be satisfied before the valuation allowance can be reversed. The criteria are as follows: first, the Company’s available federal tax net operating loss ("NOL") must be zero; second, the prior thirty-six month cumulative book basis pre-tax income (loss), after considering “one-time” events, is positive; third, the Company considers its outlook of near term continued profitable operations and assesses any material negative and positive trends or events on the immediate horizon. As of October 30, 2015, the Company (1) has utilized its entire federal net operating loss, (2) has positive thirty-six month cumulative book income and (3) meat commodity costs have lowered and stabilized and we have reduced the level of significant non- performing divisions (closure of the refrigerated deli food division during the prior fiscal year). As of October 30, 2015 all three criteria for valuation allowance reversal set forth in the Company policy have been satisfied and the Company has reversed the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. Liquidity and Capital Resources (in thousands except share amounts) The principal source of our operating cash flow is cash receipts from the sale of our products, net of costs to manufacture, store, market and deliver to customers. The Company did not borrow on the line of credit during the fiscal 2015. There were no borrowings outstanding under this line of credit as of October 30, 2015. The Company is currently in compliance with all provisions of the line of credit agreement. We typically fund our operations from cash balances and cash flow generated from operations. We normally expect positive operating cash flows in the first quarter of our fiscal year from the liquidation of inventory and accounts receivable balances related to holiday season sales. We typically build inventories in the third quarter for anticipated holiday season sales that occur in the fourth and first quarters. Anticipated commodity price trends may also affect cash balances. Certain commodities may be purchased in advance of our immediate needs to lower the ultimate cost of processing or to meet customer demand. Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation Provision for losses on accounts receivable Reduction of (provision for) promotional allowances Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment Deferred income taxes, net Tax valuation allowance Changes in operating working capital Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ 15,442 $ (4,344 ) 3,050 24 2,749 (127 ) 3,170 (10,848 ) (6,000 ) 7,460 $ 2,827 28 (2,654 ) (152 ) 1,598 (1,598 ) 274 (4,021 ) $ For the fifty-two weeks ended October 30, 2015, net cash provided by operating activities was $7,460, an increase of $11,481 compared to the fifty-two weeks ended October 31, 2014. The increase is primarily related to income from operations of $15,442. During fiscal year 2015 we funded $1,157 towards our defined benefit pension plan. The Company also paid the Teamster pension withdrawal liability in full in the amount of $798. Plan funding strategies may be adjusted depending upon economic conditions, investment options, tax deductibility, or recent legislative changes in funding requirements. 15 Our cash conversion cycle (defined as days of inventory and trade receivables less days of trade payables outstanding) was equal to 79 days for the fifty-two weeks ended October 30, 2015 and 57 days for the fifty-two weeks ended October 31, 2014. The Company had a large promotional program in the Snack Food Products segment ship out just prior to year end contributing to the increase in accounts receivable at the end of fiscal 2015. For the fifty-two weeks ended October 31, 2014, net cash used by operating activities was $4,021. This result was primarily related to a net loss and an increase in inventory in the Snack Food Products segment. During fiscal year 2014, we funded $1,587 towards our defined benefit pension plan. Cash used in investing activities: Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment Additions to property, plant and equipment Net cash used in investing activities 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ $ 52 $ (1,404 ) (1,352 ) $ 163 (3,877 ) (3,714 ) Expenditures for property, plant and equipment include the acquisition of new equipment, upgrading of facilities to maintain operating efficiency and investments in cost effective technologies to lower costs. In general, we capitalize the cost of additions and improvements and expense the cost for repairs and maintenance. We may also capitalize costs related to improvements that extend the life, increase the capacity, or improve the efficiency of existing machinery and equipment. Specifically, capitalization of upgrades of facilities to maintain operating efficiency include acquisitions of machinery and equipment used on packaging lines and refrigeration equipment used to process food products. The table below highlights the additions to property, plant and equipment for the fifty-two weeks ended: Temperature control Processing equipment Packaging lines Office and building improvements Vehicles for sales and/or delivery Quality control and communication systems Computer software and hardware Forklifts Increase (decrease) in projects in process Additions to property, plant and equipment Cash used in financing activities: Shares repurchased Payments of capital lease obligations Net cash used in financing activities 52 Weeks October 30, 2015 October 31, 2014 6 $ 200 72 18 664 49 - - 395 1,404 $ 10 2,228 250 438 963 - 6 51 (69 ) 3,877 52 Weeks 2015 2014 (283 ) $ (175 ) (458 ) $ (184 ) (214 ) (398 ) $ $ $ $ Our stock repurchase program was approved by the Board of Directors in November 1999 and was expanded in June 2005. Under the stock repurchase program, we are authorized, at the discretion of management and the Board of Directors, to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock on the open market. As of the end of fiscal year 2015, 124,568 shares were still authorized for repurchase under the program. We invested in OTR (over-the-road) tractors during fiscal 2012 financed by a capital lease obligation in the amount of $1,848. After reevaluating our fleet delivery needs, we returned five OTR tractors financed by the capital lease arrangement with a remaining liability of $656 during the second quarter of fiscal 2015 that resulted in a gain of $75. The total capital lease obligation remaining as of October 30, 2015 is $725. The capital lease arrangement replaced the long-standing month-to-month leases of transportation equipment. We maintain a line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that expires on March 1, 2016. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we converted our line of credit to a revolving line of credit. Under the terms of this line of credit, we may borrow up to $4,000 at 16 an interest rate equal to the bank’s prime rate or Libor plus 1.5%. The borrowing agreement contains various covenants, the more significant of which require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, minimum net income after tax and total capital expenditures of less than $3,000. We were in compliance with all covenants as of October 30, 2015. There have been no borrowings under this line of credit during fiscal 2015. Impact of Inflation Our operating results are heavily dependent upon the prices paid for raw materials. The marketing of our value-added products does not lend itself to instantaneous changes in selling prices. Changes in selling prices are relatively infrequent and do not compare with the volatility of commodity markets. While fluctuations in significant cost structure components, such as ingredient commodities and fuel prices, have had a significant impact on profitability over the last two fiscal years, the impact of general price inflation on our financial position and results of operations has not been significant. However, future volatility of general price inflation or deflation and raw material cost and availability could adversely affect our financial results. The impact of inflation on the Company’s financial position and results of operations has not been significant. Management is of the opinion that the Company’s strong financial position and its capital resources are sufficient to provide for its operating needs and capital expenditures for fiscal 2016. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We do not currently have any off balance sheet arrangements within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K. Contractual Obligations We have remained free of interest bearing debt (excluding capital leases) for twenty-seven of the last twenty-eight years (with fiscal 2014 being the only exception) and had no other debt or other contractual obligations within the meaning of Item 303(a)(5) of Regulation S-K, as of October 30, 2015. Critical Accounting Policies The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses during the respective reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Amounts estimated related to liabilities for self-insured workers’ compensation, employee healthcare and pension benefits are especially subject to inherent uncertainties and these estimated liabilities may ultimately settle at amounts not originally estimated. We record promotions, returns allowances, bad debt and inventory allowances based on recent and historical trends. Management believes its current estimates are reasonable and based on the best information available at the time. Disclosure concerning our policies on credit risk, revenue recognition, cash surrender or contract value for life insurance policies, deferred income tax and the recoverability of our long-lived assets are provided in Notes 1 and 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements and Regulations Various accounting standard-setting bodies have been active in soliciting comments and issuing statements, interpretations and exposure drafts. For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on our financial position or results of operations, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Not applicable for smaller reporting company. Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data The consolidated financial statements required by this Item are set forth under Item 15. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Not applicable. 17  Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures Our management, with the participation and under the supervision of our Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on this evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report in their design and operation to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our management, including our Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. We maintain and evaluate a system of internal accounting controls, and a program designed to provide reasonable assurance that our assets are protected and that transactions are performed in accordance with proper authorization, and are properly recorded. This system of internal accounting controls is continually reviewed and modified in response to evolving business conditions and operations and to recommendations made by our independent registered public accounting firm. We have established a code of conduct. Our management believes that the accounting and internal control systems provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and financial information is reliable. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors meets regularly with our financial management and counsel, and with the independent registered public accounting firm engaged by us. Internal accounting controls and the quality of financial reporting are discussed during these meetings. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 16 (Communication with Audit Committees). In addition, the Audit Committee and the independent registered public accounting firm have discussed the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence from our Company and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 “Communicating with Audit Committees Concerning Independence”. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reports There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter covered by this Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In order to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), we have undertaken and continue a comprehensive effort, which includes the documentation and review of our internal controls. In order to comply with the Act, we centralized most accounting and many administrative functions at our corporate headquarters in an effort to control the cost of maintaining our control systems. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed into law by the President on July 21, 2010, permanently exempts small public companies with less than $75 million in market capitalization, such as the Company, from the requirement to obtain an external audit on the effectiveness of internal financial reporting controls provided in Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, an attestation report on internal controls over financial reporting by an independent registered 18 public accounting firm has not been presented. Section 404(a) is still effective for smaller public companies and requires the disclosure of management attestations on internal controls over financial reporting. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting based on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) (the "2013 Framework") and related illustrative documents as an update to Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) (the "1992 Framework"). The Company has determined that the 17 principles are present and functioning during our assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for our fiscal year ended October 30, 2015. Based on management’s assessment and the above-referenced criteria, management believes that the internal control over financial reporting for our fiscal year ended October 30, 2015 was effective. Item 9B. Other Information Not applicable. 19 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance PART III Information set forth in the sections entitled “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 9, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference. Information concerning our executive officers is set forth in Part I, Item 1, hereof under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant”. Item 11. Executive Compensation Information set forth in the section entitled “Compensation of Executive Officers” contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 9, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Information set forth in the section entitled “Principal Shareholders and Management” contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 9, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference. Equity Compensation Plan Information Not applicable, as we do not have any compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Information set forth in the sections entitled “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 9, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference. We are considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of Rule 5615(c)(1) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules based on our approximate 80% beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock by Bridgford Industries Incorporated and are therefore exempted from various NASDAQ Listing Rules pertaining to certain “independence” requirements of our directors. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Andrews, Scott and Zippwald, who together comprise the Audit Committee, are all “independent directors” within the meaning of Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. Our general legal counsel is the son of the former senior chairman of the board of directors. As legal counsel to the board, he currently is paid a fee of one thousand nine hundred dollars for each meeting attended. Total fees paid under this arrangement for fiscal year 2015 were approximately twenty thousand dollars. Legal services are performed on our behalf and billed by a firm in which he is a partner. Total fees billed under this arrangement for fiscal year 2015 were approximately one hundred and eight thousand dollars. Director Allan Bridgford Jr., son of the former senior chairman of the board of directors, is providing consulting services to the Chicago plant and management. The contract on behalf of the Company with Allan Bridgford Jr. is for consulting services at twelve hundred dollars per day. Total fees billed under this arrangement for fiscal year 2015 were approximately $136,000. As a member of the board of directors, he was paid a fee of one thousand nine hundred dollars for each meeting attended during fiscal 2015. Total fees paid under this arrangement for fiscal year 2015 were $16,600. He was reappointed as Director as of January 12, 2015. Real estate consultant and prospective new Board member Keith Ross currently provides consulting services to the board and management. He was paid a fee of two thousand dollars for each board meeting attended during fiscal 2015 for a total of $4,000 during fiscal year 2015. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Information set forth in the sections entitled “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” and “Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit Services And Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Accountants” contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 9, 2016 is incorporated herein by reference. 20 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules PART IV (a)(1) Financial Statements . The following documents are filed as a part of this report: Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 Consolidated Statements of Operations for years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Page 19 23 24 25 26 26 27 28 (2) Financial Statement Schedules Not applicable for smaller reporting company. (3) Exhibits (a) The exhibits below are filed or incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit Number 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 10.1 10.2 10.3 21.1 24.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 Description Restated Articles of Incorporation, dated December 29, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated July 27, 1990 (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). By-laws, as amended (filed as Exhibit 2 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). Certificate of Amendment to By-laws (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K on October 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). Bridgford Foods Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference).* Bridgford Foods Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference).* Bridgford Foods Corporation Deferred Compensation Savings Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-K on January 28, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference).* Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Power of Attorney (included as part of the signature page) Certification of Principal Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Principal Executive Officer). Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Principal Financial Officer). 101.INS XBRL Instance Document.** 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.** 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.** 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.** 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.** 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.** * Each of these Exhibits constitutes a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement. ** The XBRL information is being furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these Sections or otherwise incorporated by reference. 21 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION /s/ WILLIAM L. BRIDGFORD By: William L. Bridgford Chairman of the Board Date: January 15, 2016 POWER OF ATTORNEY We, the undersigned directors and officers of Bridgford Foods Corporation, do hereby constitute and appoint William L. Bridgford and Raymond F. Lancy, or either of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, our true and lawful attorneys and agents, to do any and all acts and things in our name and behalf in our capacities as directors and officers and to execute any and all instruments for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, which said attorneys and agents, or either of them, or their substitutes, may deem necessary or advisable to enable said corporation to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including specifically, but without limitation, power and authority to sign for us or any of us in our names and in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments; and we do hereby ratify and confirm all that the said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date /s/ WILLIAM L. BRIDGFORD William L. Bridgford Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) January 15, 2016 /s/ BRUCE H. BRIDGFORD Bruce H. Bridgford /s/ JOHN V. SIMMONS John V. Simmons Director January 15, 2016 President & Director January 15, 2016 /s/ RAYMOND F. LANCY Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, January 15, 2016 Raymond F. Lancy /s/ TODD C. ANDREWS Todd C. Andrews /s/ ALLAN BRIDGFORD JR. Allan Bridgford Jr. /s/ D. GREGORY SCOTT D. Gregory Scott /s/ PAUL R. ZIPPWALD Paul R. Zippwald January 15, 2016 January 15, 2016 January 15, 2016 January 15, 2016 Treasurer & Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Director Director Director Director 22 Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Shareholders Bridgford Foods Corporation We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the "Company") as of October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Bridgford Foods Corporation as of October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. /s/ Squar Milner LLP (formerly Squar, Milner, Peterson, Miranda & Williamson, LLP) Newport Beach, California January 15, 2016 23 BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) Current assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $146 and $144, respectively and promotional allowances of $3,061 and $5,810, respectively Inventories, less reserves of $381 and $601, respectively Prepaid expenses Refundable income taxes Deferred income taxes, less valuation allowance of $0 and $2,113, respectively Total current assets Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $60,454 and $58,450, respectively Other non-current assets Deferred income taxes, less valuation allowance of $0 and $8,486, respectively Total assets LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued payroll, advertising and other expenses Income taxes payable Current portion of non-current liabilities Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Total liabilities Contingencies and commitments (Notes 3, 5 and 6) Shareholders’ equity: Preferred stock, without par value Authorized, - 1,000 shares; issued and outstanding – none Common stock, $1.00 par value Authorized, - 20,000 shares; issued and outstanding – 9,080 and 9,113 Capital in excess of par value Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Total shareholders’ equity Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity 2015 2014 $ 5,842 $ 192 14,619 19,977 319 - - 40,757 10,235 13,666 10,644 75,302 $ 6,087 $ 5,203 96 2,825 14,211 25,446 39,657 10,302 21,292 346 133 - 32,265 12,251 13,660 - 58,176 5,780 6,029 - 2,596 14,405 18,521 32,926 - - 9,138 8,334 40,303 (22,130 ) 35,645 75,302 $ 9,171 8,584 24,861 (17,366 ) 25,250 58,176 $ $ $ See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 24 BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS For the fiscal years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) Net sales Cost of products sold Gross margin Selling, general and administrative expenses Income (loss) before taxes Provision (benefit) for income taxes Net income (loss) Basic earnings (loss) per share 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ 130,448 $ 133,401 83,579 94,744 46,869 38,657 38,751 43,089 8,118 (4,432 ) (7,324 ) (88 ) 15,442 $ (4,344 ) 1.70 $ (0.48 ) $ $ Shares used to compute basic earnings per common share 9,098,742 9,123,593 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements 25 BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) For the fiscal years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 (in thousands) Net income (loss) Defined benefit pension plans: Actuarial (loss) gain unrecognized Prior service cost Other comprehensive (loss) income from defined benefit plans Other postretirement benefit plans: Actuarial (loss) gain Prior service cost Other comprehensive (loss) income from other postretirement benefit plans Other comprehensive (loss) income, before taxes Tax benefit (provision) on other comprehensive income/loss Valuation allowance on tax benefit from items of other comprehensive income Change in other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ 15,442 $ (4,344 ) (7,525 ) - (7,525 ) (170 ) (36 ) (206 ) (3,454 ) 1 (3,453 ) (321 ) 97 (224 ) (7,731 ) (3,677 ) 2,967 - 1,054 (1,054 ) (4,764 ) (3,677 ) Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax $ 10,678 $ (8,021 ) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY For the fiscal years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 (in thousands) Shares Amount Capital in excess of par value Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Total shareholders’ equity Balance, November 1, 2013 Shares repurchased and retired Net loss Net change in defined benefit plans and other benefit plans Balance, October 31, 2014 Shares repurchased and retired Net income Net change in defined benefit plans and other benefit plans 9,134 $ (21 ) 9,191 $ (20 ) 8,748 $ (164 ) 29,205 $ (13,689 ) $ 9,113 $ (33 ) 9,171 $ (33 ) 8,584 $ (250 ) (4,344 ) 24,861 $ 15,442 33,455 (184 ) (4,344 ) (3,677 ) 25,250 (283 ) 15,442 (4,764 ) 35,645 (3,677 ) (17,366 ) $ (4,764 ) (22,130 ) $ Balance, October 30, 2015 9,080 $ 9,138 $ 8,334 $ 40,303 $ See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 26 BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the fiscal years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 (in thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: Depreciation Provision (recovery) for losses on accounts receivable Provision for promotional allowances Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment Deferred income taxes, net Tax valuation allowance Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable Inventories Prepaid expenses Refundable income taxes Other non-current assets Accounts payable Accrued payroll, advertising and other expenses Income taxes payable Current portion of non-current liabilities Non-current liabilities Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities Cash used in investing activities: Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment Additions to property, plant and equipment Net cash used in investing activities Cash used in financing activities: Shares repurchased Payment of capital lease obligations Cash dividends paid Net cash used in financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid for income taxes Transportation equipment returned originally financed by capital lease obligation 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ 15,442 $ (4,344 ) 3,050 24 2,749 (127 ) 3,171 (10,848 ) (7,090 ) 1,315 27 133 (6 ) 307 (826 ) 96 365 (322 ) 7,460 52 (1,404 ) (1,352 ) (283 ) (175 ) - (458 ) 5,650 192 5,842 $ 156 $ (656 ) $ 2,827 28 (2,654 ) (152 ) 1,598 (1,598 ) 4,470 (2,373 ) (12 ) 549 (514 ) 965 (1,602 ) - (627 ) (582 ) (4,021 ) 163 (3,877 ) (3,714 ) (184 ) (214 ) - (398 ) (8,133 ) 8,325 192 - - $ $ $ See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 27 BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands except share and per share amounts, time periods and percentages) NOTE 1 - The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Bridgford Foods Corporation was organized in 1952. We originally began operations in 1932 as a retail meat market in San Diego, California and evolved into a meat wholesaler for hotels and restaurants, a distributor of frozen food products, a processor and packer of meat, and a manufacturer and distributor of frozen food products for sale on a retail and wholesale basis. For more than the past five years we and our subsidiaries have been primarily engaged in the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of an extensive line of frozen, refrigerated, and snack food products throughout the United States. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly- owned. All inter-company transactions have been eliminated. Use of estimates and assumptions The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the respective reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Amounts estimated related to liabilities for pension benefits, self-insured workers’ compensation and employee healthcare benefits are subject to inherent uncertainties and these estimated liabilities may ultimately settle at amounts which may vary from current estimates. Other areas with underlying estimates include realization of deferred tax assets, cash surrender or contract value of life insurance policies, promotional allowances and the allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory reserves. Management believes its current estimates are reasonable and based on the best information available at the time. We test long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If an impairment is indicated, we measure the fair value of assets to determine if and when adjustments are recorded. Subsequent events Management has evaluated events subsequent to October 30, 2015 through the date the accompanying consolidated financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for transactions and other events that may require adjustment of and/or disclosure in such financial statements. Based on its review, no material events were identified that require adjustment to the financial statements or additional disclosure. Concentrations of credit risk Our credit risk is diversified across a broad range of customers and geographic regions. Losses due to credit risk have recently been immaterial. The carrying amount of cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair market value due to the short maturity of these instruments. We maintain cash balances at financial institutions, which may at times exceed the amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Management does not believe there is significant credit risk associated with these financial institutions. The provision for doubtful accounts receivable is based on historical trends and current collectability risk. We have significant accounts receivable with a few large, well known customers which, although historically secure, could be subject to material risk should these customers’ operations suddenly deteriorate. Sales to Wal-Mart® comprised 31.4% of revenues in fiscal 2015 and 42.6% of total accounts receivable was due from Wal-Mart® at October 30, 2015. Sales to Wal-Mart® comprised 28.8% of revenues in fiscal 2014 and 31.8% of total accounts receivable was due from Wal-Mart® at October 31, 2014. Business segments Our company and its subsidiaries operate in two business segments - the processing and distribution of frozen foods products, and the processing and distribution of snack food products. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. 28  Fiscal year We maintain our accounting records on a 52-53 week fiscal basis ending on the Friday closest to October 31. As part of the regular accounting cycle, fiscal years 2015 and 2014 each included 52 weeks. Revenues Revenues are recognized upon passage of title to the customer, typically upon product pick-up, shipment or delivery to customers. Products are delivered to customers primarily through our own long-haul fleet or through a Company owned direct store delivery system. These delivery costs, $3,663 and $5,045 for 2015 and 2014, respectively, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. We record promotional and returns allowances based on recent and historical trends. Revenue is recognized as the net amount estimated to be received after deducting estimated amounts for discounts, trade allowances and product returns. Promotional allowances, including customer incentive and trade promotion activities, are recorded as a reduction to sales based on amounts estimated being due to customers, based primarily on historical utilization and redemption rates. Promotional allowances deducted from sales for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 were $8,881 and $10,868, respectively. Advertising expenses Advertising and other promotional expenses are recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses. Advertising expenses for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 were $1,861 and $3,093, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents We consider all investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include money market funds and treasury bills. Cash equivalents totaled $5,842 at October 30, 2015 and $192 at October 31, 2014. All material cash and cash equivalents at October 30, 2015 were held at Wells Fargo Bank N.A. Fair value measurements We classify levels of inputs to measure the fair value of financial assets as follows: ● Level 1 inputs: Level 1 inputs are quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. ● Level 2 inputs: Level 2 inputs are from other than quoted market prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. ● Level 3 inputs: Level 3 inputs are unobservable and should be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available. The hierarchy noted above requires us to minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to use observable market data, if available, when determining fair value. The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis for the years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014. Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. Costs related to warehousing, transportation and distribution to customers are considered when computing market value. Inventories include the cost of raw materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and write down any excess or obsolete inventories to net realizable value. An inventory reserve is created when potentially slow-moving or obsolete inventories are identified in order to reflect the appropriate inventory value. Changes in economic conditions, production requirements, and lower than expected customer demand could result in additional obsolete or slow-moving inventory that cannot be sold or must be sold at reduced prices and could result in additional reserve provisions. Property, plant and equipment Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Major renewals and improvements are charged to the asset accounts while the cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the resulting gain or 29 loss is credited or charged to income. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over 10 to 20 years for buildings and improvements, 5 to 10 years for machinery and equipment, and 3 to 5 years for transportation equipment. Capital Leases Leased property and equipment that meet capital lease criteria are capitalized at the lower of the present value of the minimum payments required under the lease or the fair value of the asset at inception of the lease and are included within property, plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet. Obligations under capital leases are accounted for as current and noncurrent liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Amortization is calculated on a straight-line method based upon the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. Life insurance policies We record the cash surrender value or contract value for life insurance policies as an adjustment of premiums paid in determining the expense or income to be recognized under the contract for the period. The cash surrender value is included in other non-current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Income taxes Deferred taxes are provided for items whose financial and tax bases differ. A valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is expected that it is more likely than not that the related asset will not be fully realized. The determination as to whether or not a deferred tax asset can be fully realized is subject to a significant degree of judgment, based at least partially upon a projection of future taxable income, which takes into consideration past and future trends in profitability, customer demand, supply costs, and multiple other factors, none of which are predictable. We provide tax accruals for federal, state and local exposures relating to audit results, tax planning initiatives and compliance responsibilities. The development of these accruals requires judgments about tax issues, potential outcomes and timing. (See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Although the outcome of these tax audits is uncertain, in management’s opinion adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for potential liabilities emanating from these reviews. If actual outcomes differ materially from these estimates, they could have a material impact on our results of operations. Stock-based compensation We measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, in the financial statements based on the fair value at the date of the grant. We have not issued, awarded, granted or entered into any stock-based payment agreements since April 29, 1999. Foreign currency transactions Our foreign branch located in Canada enters into transactions that are denominated in a foreign currency. The related transaction gains and losses arising from changes in exchange rates are not material and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations in the period the transaction occurred. Our Canadian branch was closed at the end of fiscal year 2014. Comprehensive income (loss) Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income and additional minimum pension liability adjustments. Recently issued accounting pronouncements and regulations In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” to supersede previous revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP. The guidance presents steps for comprehensive revenue recognition that requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating this statement and its impact on its results of operations or financial position. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”. The guidance is part of the “Simplification Initiative” to identify and re-evaluate areas where the generally accepted accounting principles may be complex and cumbersome to apply. The guidance will require that inventory be stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value as 30 opposed to the lower of cost or market. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price for the inventory less completion, disposal and transportation costs. The guidance becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company already values inventory by the proposed method. In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”. The guidance requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The guidance becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 6, 2016 with early adoption permitted. The Company applied this guidance to its current fiscal year ending October 30, 2015. Adoption of this guidance had no material impact on the results of operations or financial position. NOTE 2 - Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions: 2015 2014 Inventories: Meat, ingredients and supplies Work in process Finished goods Property, plant and equipment: Land Buildings and improvements Machinery and equipment Asset impairment Capital leased trucks Transportation equipment Construction in process Accumulated depreciation and amortization Other non-current assets: Cash surrender value benefits Other Accrued payroll, advertising and other expenses: Payroll, vacation, payroll taxes and employee benefits Accrued advertising and broker commissions Property taxes Other Current portion of non-current liabilities (Note 3): Defined benefit retirement plan Executive retirement plans Incentive compensation Capital lease obligation Postretirement healthcare Non-current liabilities (Note 3): Defined benefit retirement plan Executive retirement plans Capital lease obligation Incentive compensation Teamster pension withdrawal liability Postretirement healthcare 31 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,268 $ 1,125 13,584 19,977 $ 1,802 $ 14,272 47,687 - 1,192 5,219 517 70,689 (60,454 ) 10,235 $ 13,660 $ 6 13,666 $ 3,589 $ 704 356 554 5,203 $ 1,150 $ 277 1,196 162 40 2,825 $ 17,362 $ 4,630 563 1,929 - 962 25,446 $ 4,716 1,447 15,129 21,292 1,802 14,254 47,352 (234 ) 1,848 5,522 157 70,701 (58,450 ) 12,251 13,654 6 13,660 4,007 1,278 327 417 6,029 1,127 467 718 241 43 2,596 10,830 4,227 1,104 640 798 922 18,521 NOTE 3 - Retirement and Other Benefit Plans: Noncontributory-Trusteed Defined Benefit Retirement Plans for Sales, Administrative, Supervisory and Certain Other Employees We have noncontributory-trusteed defined benefit retirement plans for sales, administrative, supervisory and certain other employees. In the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we froze future benefit accruals under this plan for employees classified within the administrative, sales or supervisory job classifications or within any non-bargaining class. The benefits under these plans are primarily based on years of service and compensation levels. The funding policy of the plan is to make contributions which are at least equal to the minimum required contributions needed to avoid a funding deficiency. The measurement date for the plan is our fiscal year end. Net pension cost consisted of the following: Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of unrecognized loss Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs Net pension cost 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ $ 113 $ 2,176 (3,346 ) 1,244 - 187 $ 135 2,226 (3,131 ) 830 1 61 Net pension costs and benefit obligations are determined using assumptions as of the beginning of each fiscal year. Weighted average assumptions for each fiscal year are as follows: Discount rate Rate of increase in salary levels Expected return on plan assets 2015 2014 4.15 % N/A 8.00 % 4.05 % N/A 8.00 % The benefit obligation, plan assets, and funded status of these plans as of the fiscal years ended are as follows: Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets - beginning of year Employer contributions Actual return on plan assets Benefits paid Fair value of plan assets - end of year Change in benefit obligations: Benefit obligations - beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial (gain) loss Benefits paid Benefit obligations - end of year Funded status of the plans Unrecognized prior service costs Unrecognized net actuarial loss Net amount recognized 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ $ $ $ 42,320 $ 1,157 (640 ) (1,418 ) 41,419 $ 54,277 $ 113 2,176 4,783 (1,418 ) 59,931 (18,512 ) 0 25,844 7,332 $ 39,124 1,587 2,939 (1,330 ) 42,320 49,154 135 2,226 4,093 (1,331 ) 54,277 (11,957 ) 0 18,319 6,362 We perform an internal rate of return analysis when making the discount rate selection. The discount rates were based on Citigroup Pension Liability Index as of October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 respectively. Plan assets are primarily invested in marketable equity securities, corporate and government debt securities and are administered by an investment management company. The plans’ long-term return on assets is based on the weighted-average of the plans’ investment allocation as of the measurement date and the published historical returns for those types of asset categories, taking into consideration inflation rate forecasts. Our expected employer contribution to the plan in fiscal year 2016 is $1,150. 32 During fiscal 2015, our actuary updated mortality tables from the IRS 2014 Combined Static Mortality assumptions to the SOA RP 2014 Total Dataset Adjusted to 2006 with Scale MP-2015. The change in mortality table resulted in a significant liability increase in fiscal 2015 as well as an increased net periodic pension cost (NPPC) projection for fiscal 2016. The expected rate of return on plan assets decreased from 8.00% to 7.00% effective for the 2016 fiscal year. The lower expected rate of return increases net pension costs in future fiscal years. The actual and target allocation for plan assets are as follows: Asset Class Large Cap Equities Mid Cap Equities Small Cap Equities International (equities only) Fixed Income Other (Government/Corporate, Bonds) Cash Total Target Asset Allocation 32.0 % 0.0 % 12.0 % 21.0 % 31.0 % 2.0 % 2.0 % 100 % 2015 31.1 % 0 % 13.3 % 20.3 % 30.8 % 1.9 % 2.6 % 100.0 Target Asset Allocation 2014 30.9 % 0 % 15.6 % 18.4 % 29.2 % 2.8 % 3.1 % 100.0 30.0 % 0.0 % 15.0 % 20.0 % 31.0 % 2.0 % 2.0 % 100 % The fair value of our pension plan assets and the level under which fair values were determined, using the hierarchy described in Note 1, is as follows: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Year Ended 2015 Total plan assets $ 41,419 - - $ 41,419 Expected payments for the pension benefits are as follows: Fiscal Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 Executive Retirement Plans Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Pension Benefits 1,940 2,064 2,158 2,295 2,443 14,914 $ $ $ $ $ $ Effective January 1, 1991 we adopted a deferred compensation savings plan for certain key employees. Under this arrangement, selected employees contribute a portion of their annual compensation to the plan. We contribute an amount to each participant’s account by computing an investment return equal to Moody’s Average Seasoned Bond Rate plus 2%. Employees receive vested amounts upon death, termination or attainment of retirement age. No benefit expense was recorded under these plans for fiscal years 2015 and 2014. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan In fiscal year 1991, we adopted a non-qualified supplemental retirement plan for certain key employees. Benefits provided under the plan are equal to 60% of the employee’s final average earnings, less amounts provided by our defined benefit pension plan and amounts available through Social Security. Benefits payable related to these plans and included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements were $4,907 and $4,694 at October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, respectively. In connection with this arrangement we are the beneficiary of life insurance policies on the lives of certain key employees and retirees. The aggregate cash surrender value of these policies, included in non-current assets, was $13,660 and $13,654 at October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, respectively. 33 Expected payments for executive postretirement benefits are as follows: Fiscal Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 Executive Postretirement Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ 280 78 126 280 502 2,510 Incentive Compensation Plan for Certain Key Executives We provide an incentive compensation plan for certain key executives, which is based upon our pretax income. The payment of these amounts is generally deferred over three or five-year periods. The total amount payable related to this arrangement was $3,125 and $1,359 at October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, respectively. Future payments are approximately $1,196, $900, $868, $102 and $59 for fiscal years 2016 through 2020, respectively. Postretirement Healthcare Benefits for Selected Executive Employees We provide postretirement health care benefits for selected executive employees. Net periodic postretirement healthcare cost is determined using assumptions as of the beginning of each fiscal year, except for the total actual benefit payments and the discount rate used to develop the net periodic postretirement benefit expense, which is determined at the end of the fiscal year. Net periodic postretirement healthcare cost consisted of the following: Service cost Interest cost Amortization of prior service cost Amortization of actuarial gain Net periodic postretirement healthcare cost (benefit) 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ $ 20 $ 36 - (37 ) 19 $ 18 37 - (65 ) (10 ) Weighted average assumptions for the fiscal years ended October 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 are as follows: Discount rate Medical trend rate next year Ultimate trend rate Year ultimate trend rate is achieved 2015 2014 3.94 % 8.50 % 5.00 % 2021 3.83 % 8.50 % 5.00 % 2021 The table below shows the estimated effect of a 1% increase in healthcare cost trend rate on the following: Interest cost plus service cost Accumulated postretirement healthcare obligation 2015 2014 $ $ 5 $ 80 $ The table below shows the estimated effect of a 1% decrease in healthcare cost trend rate on the following: Interest cost plus service cost Accumulated postretirement healthcare obligation 2015 2014 $ $ (4 ) $ (66 ) $ 5 78 (4 ) (64 ) 34 The healthcare obligation and funded status of this plan as of the fiscal years ended are as follows: Change in accumulated postretirement healthcare obligation: Healthcare obligation - beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial loss (gain) Benefits paid Healthcare obligation – end of year Funded status of the plans Unrecognized prior service costs Unrecognized net actuarial gain Unrecognized amounts recorded in other comprehensive income Postretirement healthcare liability Expected payments for the postretirement benefits are as follows: Fiscal Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 2015 2014 $ $ $ 965 $ 20 36 1 (19 ) 1,003 $ 1,003 - (174 ) 174 1,003 $ 880 18 37 52 (22 ) 965 965 - (212 ) 212 965 Postretirement Heathcare Benefits $ $ $ $ $ $ 41 41 41 41 86 436 401(K) Plan for Sales, Administrative, Supervisory and Certain Other Employees During the fiscal year ended November 3, 2006, we implemented a qualified 401(K) retirement plan (the “Plan”) for our sales, administrative, supervisory and certain other employees. During fiscal years 2015 and 2014, we made total employer contributions to the Plan in the amounts of $515 and $500, respectively. Teamster Pension Withdrawal Liability During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we closed the refrigerated snack food products division (a division within the Refrigerated and Snack Food Segment involving primarily deli products) and withdrew from the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan. According to the Multi-employer Pension Plan Act of 1980 we are subject to the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund Withdrawal Liability. We recorded a liability in the amount of $798 as of October 31, 2014 and expense in other selling and administrative expenses for fiscal 2014. This amount was paid in October 2015. NOTE 4 - Income Taxes: The (benefit) provision for taxes on income includes the following: Current: Federal State Deferred: Federal State 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ $ 253 $ 100 353 (6,335 ) (1,342 ) (7,677 ) (7,324 ) $ (91 ) 3 (88 ) - - (88 ) 35 The total tax provision differs from the expected amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes as follows: Provision (benefit) for federal income taxes at the applicable statutory rate Increase in provision (benefit) resulting from state income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit Research & development tax credit Non-taxable life insurance gain Change in valuation allowance Other, net 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ 2,772 $ (1,477 ) 641 (3 ) (2 ) (10,848 ) 116 (7,324 ) $ 61 (25 ) (175 ) 1,598 (70 ) (88 ) $ Deferred income taxes result from differences in the bases of assets and liabilities for tax and accounting purposes. 2015 2014 Receivables allowance Returns allowance Inventory packaging reserve Inventory overhead capitalization Incentive compensation State taxes Employee benefits Other Valuation allowance Current tax assets, net Receivables allowance Returns allowance Inventory packaging reserve Inventory overhead capitalization Employee benefits Other State taxes Incentive compensation Pension and health care benefits Depreciation Net operating loss carry-forward and credits Valuation allowance Non-current tax assets, net $ $ $ $ - $ - - - - - - - - - $ 58 $ 201 125 400 793 1 (515 ) 925 9,202 (816 ) 271 - 10,645 $ 58 163 165 452 272 8 911 84 (2,113 ) - - - - - - - 263 257 6,366 (1,280 ) 2,880 (8,486 ) - ASC 740 requires that an entity's deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent its management determines that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax asset, or portion thereof, will not be realized. Management evaluated the realizability of its deferred tax assets to determine the need and appropriateness of a valuation allowance. In its determinations, Management considers items of evidence, both positive and negative, including those items outlined in ASC 740. The Company policy outlines measurable objective criteria that must be met before a release of the valuation allowance will occur. The three criteria set forth in the policy must all be satisfied before the valuation allowance can be reversed. The criteria are as follows: first, the Company’s available federal tax net operating loss ("NOL") must be zero; second, the prior thirty-six month cumulative book basis pre-tax income (loss), after considering “one-time” events, is positive; third, the Company considers its outlook of near term continued profitable operations and assesses any material negative and positive trends or events on the immediate horizon. As of October 30, 2015, the Company (1) will extinguish its federal tax NOL, (2) has positive thirty-six month cumulative book income and (3) profitable operations are anticipated given recent positive economic factors including lower and more stable commodity costs combined with a reduction in the level of significant non-performing divisions (closure of the refrigerated snack division during the prior fiscal year). Due to the degree of judgment involved, actual taxable income could differ materially from management's estimates, or the timing of taxable income could be such that the net operating losses could expire prior to their utilization. Management could 36 determine in the future that the assets are unrealizable, materially decreasing net income in one or more periods. Following recognition, management could reinstate a full valuation allowance should operating performance decline. As of October 30, 2015, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $0 and $2,951 respectively. These loss carryforwards will expire at various dates from 2018 through 2033. In July 2006, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. This interpretation prescribed a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The guidance also discussed derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The provisions of this guidance have been incorporated into Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 740-10. In November 2015, the FASB issued guidance in ASU 2015-17 concerning the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes in an initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. All deferred tax liabilities and assets should now be classified as noncurrent in the statement of financial position to simplify presentation of deferred tax assets. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We have already adopted this guidance and the change is reflected of October 30, 2015. As of October 30, 2015, we have provided a liability of $112 for unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax matters. A significant portion of this amount would generally reduce our effective income tax rate if recognized in future reporting periods. We have not identified any new unrecognized tax benefits. As of October 31, 2014, we have provided a liability of $100 for unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax matters. A significant portion of this amount would generally reduce our effective income tax rate if recognized in future reporting periods. We have not identified any new unrecognized tax benefits. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: Balance at beginning of year Additions based on tax positions related to the current year Additions for tax positions of prior years Reductions for tax positions of prior years Settlements Balance at end of year 52 Weeks 2015 2014 $ $ 100 $ 12 2 (2 ) - 112 $ 100 - 1 (1 ) - 100 We recognize any future accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of October 30, 2015, we had approximately $6 in accrued interest and penalties which is included as a component of the $112 unrecognized tax benefit noted above. Our federal income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ended October 31, 2012 through 2014. We are subject to income tax in California and various other state taxing jurisdictions. Our state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2011 through 2014. We do not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months. NOTE 5 - Line of Credit: We maintain a line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that expires on March 1, 2016. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we converted our line of credit to a revolving line of credit. Under the terms of this line of credit, we may borrow up to $4,000 at an interest rate equal to the bank’s prime rate or Libor plus 1.5%. The borrowing agreement contains various covenants, the more significant of which require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, minimum net income after tax and total capital expenditures less than $3,000. We were in compliance with all covenants as of October 30, 2015. There have been no borrowings under this line of credit during fiscal 2015. 37 NOTE 6 - Contingencies and Commitments: We lease warehouse and/or office facilities throughout the United States and Canada through month-to-month rental agreements. Leases for semi-truck trailers expired in 2015 and are classified as operating leases. Six year leases for OTR (over-the- road) tractors expire in 2018 and are classified as capital leases. After reevaluating our fleet delivery needs, we returned five OTR tractors financed by the capital lease arrangement with a remaining liability of $445 during the second quarter of fiscal 2015 that resulted in a gain of $75. Rental payments including prior leases were $448 in 2015 and $574 in 2014. Amortization of equipment under capital lease was $225 in 2015. The following is a schedule by years of future minimum lease payments for transportation leases: Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 Total Minimum Lease Payments(a) Less: Amount representing executory costs Less: Amount representing interest(b) Present value of future minimum lease payments(c) Capital Leases Operating Leases Financing Obligations 246 246 452 944 $ (186 ) (33 ) 725 $ $ 16 - - 16 $ 262 246 452 960 (a) Minimum payments exclude contingent rentals based on actual mileage and adjustments of rental payments based on the Consumer Price Index. Contingent rentals amounted to $93 in 2015 and $116 in 2014 including prior lease arrangements. (b) Amount necessary to reduce net minimum lease payments to present value calculated at our incremental borrowing rate at the inception of the leases. (c) Reflected in Note 2, as current and noncurrent obligations under capital leases of $162 and $563, respectively. 38 NOTE 7 - Segment Information: We have two reportable operating segments, Frozen Food Products (the processing and distribution of frozen products) and Snack Food Products (the processing and distribution of meat and other convenience foods). We evaluate each segment’s performance based on revenues and operating income. Selling, general and administrative expenses include corporate accounting, information systems, human resource and marketing management at the corporate level. These activities are allocated to each operating segment based on revenues and/or actual usage. The following segment information is for the fiscal years ended October 30, 2015 (52 weeks) and October 31, 2014 (52 weeks): 2015 Sales Intersegment sales Net sales Cost of products sold Gross margin SG&A Income before taxes Segment Information Frozen Food Products Snack Food Products Other Elimination Totals $ 50,549 - 50,549 30,372 20,177 14,625 5,552 79,899 - 79,899 53,207 26,692 24,126 2,566 - - - - - - - - $ - - - - - - - $ - $ 130,448 - 130,448 83,579 46,869 38,751 8,118 75,302 1,404 Total assets Additions to PP&E $ $ 11,206 186 33,853 1,231 30,243 (13 ) 2014 Sales Intersegment sales Net sales Cost of products sold Gross margin SG&A Income before taxes Segment Information Refrigerated and Snack Food Products Frozen Food Products Other Elimination Totals Refrigerated Products Division* $ 50,740 50,740 31,790 18,950 15,715 3,235 82,661 446 83,107 63,400 19,707 27,374 (7,667 ) - - - - - - - - $ (446 ) (446 ) (446 ) - - - 133,401 - 133,401 94,744 38,657 43,089 (4,432 ) 6,650 - 6,650 4,704 1,946 5,001 (3,055 ) Total assets Additions to PP&E $ $ 11,332 201 32,427 3,601 14,417 75 - $ - $ 58,176 3,877 * = At the end of fiscal year 2014, we discontinued operation of the refrigerated snack food products division which was reported under the Refrigerated and Snack Food Products segment. NOTE 8- Unaudited Interim Financial Information: Not applicable to smaller reporting company 39  Exhibit 21.1 BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT Name of Subsidiary Bridgford Marketing Company Bridgford Meat Company Bridgford Food Processing Corporation Bridgford Food Processing of Texas, L.P.** A.S.I. Corporation Bridgford Distributing Company of Delaware (inactive) American Ham Processors, Inc.* Bert Packing Company (inactive) Moriarty Meat Company * - No shares have been issued. ** - Limited Partnership. State in which Incorporated California California California Texas California Delaware Delaware Illinois Illinois Exhibit 31.1 I, William L. Bridgford, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bridgford Foods Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. b. c. d. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. b. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Dated: January 15, 2016 /s/ WILLIAM L. BRIDGFORD William L. Bridgford, Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) Exhibit 31.2 I, Raymond F. Lancy, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bridgford Foods Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. b. c. d. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. b. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Dated: January 15, 2016 /s/ RAYMOND F. LANCY Raymond F. Lancy Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, William L. Bridgford, Chairman of the Board of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: January 15, 2016 This certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. /s/ WILLIAM L. BRIDGFORD William L. Bridgford Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: January 15, 2016 /s/ RAYMOND F. LANCY Raymond F. Lancy Chief Financial Officer, Vice President Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) This certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION _________________________________ NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS March 9, 2016 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time _________________________________ To the Shareholders of BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION: The annual meeting of the shareholders of Bridgford Foods Corporation, a California corporation, will be held at the offices of Bridgford Foods Corporation, 1308 North Patt Street, Anaheim, California 92801, on Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, for the following purposes: (1) To elect eight directors to hold office for one year or until their successors are elected and qualified. (2) To ratify the appointment of Squar Milner LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending on October 28, 2016. (3) To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any postponements or adjournments thereof. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the eight director nominees referenced in Proposal 1 and “FOR” Proposal 2. Each of the Proposals is described in greater detail in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or the Notice. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on February 5, 2016 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on Wednesday, March 9, 2016. Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, the Company has elected to provide access to its proxy materials both by sending you a full set of proxy materials, including this Notice, the accompanying Proxy Statement and Proxy Card, and the 2015 Annual Report to Shareholders, and by notifying you of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice, Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and 2015 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at: https://materials.proxyvote.com/108763 All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting. HOWEVER, TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE MEETING, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESPECTFULLY URGES YOU TO SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE. If you attend the meeting in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote your shares at the meeting. Shareholders attending the meeting whose shares are held in the name of a broker or other nominee who desire to vote their shares at the meeting should bring with them a letter or account statement from that firm confirming their ownership of shares. The meeting will be held at the principal offices of Bridgford Foods Corporation, which are located at 1308 North Patt Street, Anaheim, California 92801, one block east of Anaheim Blvd. and just south of the 91 Freeway in the city of Anaheim, California. Driving directions may be obtained by contacting the office manager at 714-526-5533. Your vote is extremely important. Please vote as soon as possible to ensure that your vote is recorded promptly even if you plan to attend the annual meeting. By order of the Board of Directors /s/ Cindy Matthews-Morales Cindy Matthews-Morales Secretary Anaheim, California February 22, 2016 (This page intentionally left blank.) BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION 1308 North Patt Street, Anaheim, California 92801 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS to be held March 9, 2016 _________________________________ PROXY STATEMENT _________________________________ GENERAL INFORMATION The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Bridgford Foods Corporation, a California corporation, which we refer to as “the Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our,” for use at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company, or the Annual Meeting, to be held at the offices of the Company, which are located at 1308 North Patt Street, Anaheim, California 92801, on Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, and at any postponement or adjournment thereof. All shareholders of record at the close of business on February 5, 2016 are entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy are being mailed on or about February, 22, 2016. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING The following questions and answers are intended to briefly address potential questions that our shareholders may have regarding this Proxy Statement and the Annual Meeting. They are also intended to provide our shareholders with certain information that is required to be provided under the rules and regulations of the SEC. These questions and answers may not address all of the questions that are important to you as a shareholder. If you have additional questions about the Proxy Statement or the Annual Meeting, please see "Whom should I contact with other questions?” below. 1. What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting? At the Annual Meeting, our shareholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the matters described in this Proxy Statement and in the accompanying Notice, and any other matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting. 2. What is a proxy statement and what is a proxy? A proxy statement is a document that the SEC regulations require us to give you when we ask you to sign a proxy designating individuals to vote on your behalf. A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card. 3. Why did I receive these proxy materials? We are providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of the Company of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting, and at any postponement or adjournment thereof. This Proxy Statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the Annual Meeting. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. However, you do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your shares. Instead, you may vote your shares using one of the other voting methods described in this Proxy Statement. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares as soon as possible in order to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting and to minimize the cost to the Company of proxy solicitation. 4. What am I being asked to vote upon at the Annual Meeting? At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to: • Vote on the election of eight director nominees to serve for one year or until their successors are elected and qualified (Proposal 1); • Ratify the appointment of Squar Milner LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending on October 28, 2016 (Proposal 2); and • Act upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. 5. Does the Board of Directors recommend voting in favor of the proposals? Yes. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote your shares • • “FOR” each of the eight director nominees; and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Squar Milner LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending on October 28, 2016. 6. Who can vote at the Annual Meeting? Only our “shareholders of record” at the close of business on February 5, 2016, the Record Date, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 9,078,507 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each matter to be voted upon by such shareholders and, upon prior notice, to cumulate votes for the election of directors as discussed in Proposal 1 below. Beneficial Owners If, on the Record Date, your shares were held in an account at a bank, broker, dealer, or other nominee, then you are the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name” and this Proxy Statement is being forwarded to you by that nominee. The nominee holding your account is considered the “shareholder of record” for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your nominee on how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the “shareholder of record,” you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your nominee. Please contact your nominee directly for additional information. Brokers, banks or other nominees holding shares of record for their respective customers generally are not entitled to vote on the election of directors unless they receive voting instructions from their customers. As used herein, “uninstructed shares” means shares held by a nominee who has not received instructions from its customers on a particular matter. As used herein, “broker non-vote” means the votes that could have been cast on the matter by nominees with respect to uninstructed shares if the nominees had received instructions. The effect of proxies marked “withheld” as to any director nominee or “abstain” as to any other Proposal, and the effect of broker non-votes on each of the Proposals, is discussed in each Proposal below. 7. What are the voting requirements to approve the proposals? All proxies, which are properly completed, signed and returned to the Company prior to the Annual Meeting, and not revoked, will be voted in accordance with the instructions given in the proxy. Please see each Proposal below for voting requirements to approve the Proposals. 8. What happens if I do not vote? Please see each Proposal below for the effect of not voting as well as the effect of withholdings, abstentions and broker non-votes. 9. What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting? The presence at the Annual Meeting of a majority of the outstanding shares, in person or by proxy, relating to any matter to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, is necessary to constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting. For purposes of the quorum, shareholders of record who are present at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy and who abstain or withhold their vote, including brokers, dealers or other nominees holding shares of their respective customers of record who cause abstentions to be recorded at the Annual Meeting, are considered shareholders who are present and entitled to vote and count toward the quorum. If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting will be adjourned until a quorum is obtained. 10. How can I vote my shares? Shareholders of record can vote by proxy or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. The persons named as proxies were designated by the Board of Directors. If you vote by proxy, you can vote by mail as described below. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” please refer to the information forwarded by your bank, broker, dealer or other nominee to see which voting options are available to you. • Vote by Mail. You can vote by mail pursuant to the instructions provided on the Proxy Card. If you hold shares beneficially in “street name,” you can vote by mail by following the voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank, trustee or 2 nominee. If you choose to vote by mail, simply mark, sign, date and return your Proxy Card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope provided with this Proxy Statement. • Vote at the Annual Meeting. Voting by mail will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. Nevertheless, to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors respectfully urges you to vote by mail. If you attend the meeting in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote your shares at the meeting. Shareholders attending the meeting whose shares are held in “street name” by a bank, broker, dealer or other nominee who desire to vote their shares at the meeting should bring with them a letter or account statement from that firm confirming their ownership of shares prior to the Record Date. All shares that have been properly voted and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting. If you sign and return your Proxy Card but do not give voting instructions, the shares represented by that proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors (as described in each Proposal below). 11. How may I attend the Annual Meeting? You are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting only if you were a shareholder as of the Record Date or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. Since seating is limited, admission to the Annual Meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. You should be prepared to present government-issued photo identification for admittance, such as a passport or driver's license. If your shares are held in “street name,” you also will need proof of ownership as of the Record Date to be admitted to the Annual Meeting, such as a letter or account statement from the bank, broker, dealer or other nominee confirming your ownership of shares prior to the Record Date, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your bank, broker, dealer or other nominee, or similar evidence of ownership. If you do not comply with each of the foregoing requirements, you may not be admitted to the Annual Meeting. The meeting will be held at the principal offices of the Company, which are located at 1308 North Patt Street, Anaheim, California 92801, one block east of Anaheim Blvd. and just south of the 91 Freeway in the city of Anaheim, California. Driving directions may be obtained by contacting the office manager at 714-526-5533. 12. What can I do if I change my mind after I vote my shares? Any proxy may be revoked or superseded by (i) executing a later proxy, (ii) giving notice of revocation in writing prior to, or at, the Annual Meeting, or (iii) attending the Annual Meeting, withdrawing the proxy and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute revocation of the proxy. If you have instructed your bank, broker, dealer or other nominee to vote your shares, you must follow directions received from your nominee to change those instructions. 13. Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting? As of the date this Proxy Statement went to press, the Board of Directors did not know of any matters which will be brought before the Annual Meeting other than those specifically set forth in the Notice hereof. However, if any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that the proxies, or their substitutes, will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. 14. Who is paying for the cost of this proxy solicitation? Solicitation of proxies will be primarily by mail, although some of the officers, directors and employees of the Company may solicit proxies personally or by telephone, facsimile or electronic mail. All expenses incurred in connection with this solicitation will be borne by the Company. The Company will reimburse brokers and others who incur costs to send proxy materials to beneficial owners of stock in the name of a broker or nominee. 15. How can shareholders nominate a candidate for election as a director? Any shareholder desiring to submit a recommendation for consideration by the Board of a candidate that the shareholder believes is qualified to be a Board nominee at any upcoming shareholders meeting may do so by submitting that recommendation in writing to the Board not later than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which the proxy materials for the prior year’s annual meeting were first sent to shareholders, or October 26, 2015 for the 2016 Annual Meeting. However, if the date of the upcoming annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the prior year’s meeting, the recommendation must be received within a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and mail its proxy materials for the upcoming annual meeting. In addition, the recommendation should be accompanied by the following information: • the name and address of the nominating shareholder and of the person or persons being recommended for consideration as a candidate for Board membership; 3 • • • • the number of shares of voting stock of the Company that are owned by the nominating shareholder, his or her recommended candidate and any other shareholders known by the nominating shareholder to be supporting the candidate’s nomination; a description of any arrangements or understandings, that relate to the election of directors of the Company, between the nominating shareholder, or any person that (directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries) controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such shareholder and any other person or persons (naming such other person or persons); such other information regarding each such recommended candidate as would be required to be included in a Proxy Statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC; and the written consent of each such recommended candidate to be named as a nominee and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director. No director nominations by shareholders have been received as of the filing of this Proxy Statement. 16. I share an address with another shareholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials? The SEC rules permit brokers and other persons who hold the Company's shares for beneficial owners, to participate in a practice known as “householding,” which means that only one copy of the Proxy Statement and annual report will be sent to multiple shareholders who share the same address unless other instructions are provided to the Company. Householding is designed to reduce printing and postage costs and therefore results in cost savings for the Company. If you receive a household mailing this year and would like to have additional copies of this Proxy Statement and/or the 2015 Annual Report mailed to you, or if you would like to opt out of this practice for future mailings, please contact your broker or other nominee record holder, or submit your request to: Bridgford Foods Corporation 1308 North Patt Street Anaheim, California 92801 Attention: Corporate Secretary Phone: (714) 526-5533 Upon receipt of any such request, the Company agrees to promptly deliver a copy of this Proxy Statement and/or the 2015 Annual Report to you. In addition, if you are currently a shareholder sharing an address with another shareholder and wish to receive only one copy of future proxy materials for your household, please contact us using the contact information set forth above. 17. Where can I find voting results of the Annual Meeting? We will announce preliminary voting results with respect to each proposal at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with SEC rules, final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days following the Annual Meeting, unless final results are not known at that time in which case preliminary voting results will be published within four business days of the Annual Meeting and final voting results will be published once they are known by the Company. 18. What is the deadline to submit shareholder proposals for the 2017 Annual Meeting? Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received at the Company’s principal office no later than October 26, 2016 in order to be considered for inclusion in the Proxy Statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. Matters pertaining to such proposals, including the number and length thereof, eligibility of persons entitled to have such proposals included and other aspects are regulated by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, if the Company is not provided notice of a shareholder proposal, which the shareholder has not previously sought to include in the Company’s Proxy Statement, by January 9, 2017, the Company will be allowed to use its discretionary voting authority when the proposal is raised at the meeting, without any discussion of the matter in the Proxy Statement. 4 19. Where can I find information about the Annual Report of the Company? The Company will furnish without charge to each person whose proxy is being solicited, upon request of any such person, a copy of the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2015, as such was filed with the SEC, including financial statements and associated schedules. Such report was filed with the SEC on January 15, 2016 and is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, as well as the Company’s website at http:// www.bridgford.com. Requests for copies of such report should be directed to: Bridgford Foods Corporation 1308 North Patt Street Anaheim, California 92801 Attention: Corporate Secretary 20. Whom should I contact with other questions? If you have additional questions about this Proxy Statement or the Annual Meeting, or if you would like additional copies of this Proxy Statement, please contact: Bridgford Foods Corporation 1308 North Patt Street Anaheim, California 92801 Attention: Corporate Secretary Phone: (714) 526-5533 5 (This page intentionally left blank.) PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS The directors of the Company are elected annually to serve until the next annual meeting of the shareholders or until their respective successors are elected and duly qualified. At the Annual Meeting, eight directors have been nominated for election. The election of directors shall be by the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares voting in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Every shareholder, or his or her proxy, entitled to vote upon the election of directors may cumulate his or her votes and give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of votes to which his or her shares are entitled, or distribute his or her votes on the same principle among as many candidates as he or she deems appropriate. No shareholder or proxy, however, shall be entitled to cumulate votes unless such candidate or candidates have been nominated prior to the voting and the shareholder has given notice at the meeting, prior to the voting, of the shareholder’s intention to cumulate such shareholder’s votes. If any shareholder gives such notice, all shareholders may cumulate their votes for candidates in nomination. Seven of the eight nominees are presently directors of the Company and were elected to the Board of Directors by the Company’s shareholders at the 2015 Annual Meeting, with the sole exception being Keith Ross, who has been selected by the Board of Directors as the nominee to replace incumbent Paul Zippwald, who has chosen not to stand for re-election. All current directorships are being filled. Unless otherwise instructed, shares represented by the proxies will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the nominees listed below. Broker non-votes and proxies marked “WITHHELD” as to one or more of the nominees will result in the respective nominees receiving fewer votes. However, the number of votes otherwise received by the nominee will not be reduced by such action. Each nominee has indicated that he is willing and able to serve as director if elected. In the event that any of such nominees shall become unavailable for any reason, an event which management does not anticipate, it is intended that proxies will be voted for substitute nominees designated by management. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED BELOW. The following table and biographical summaries set forth, with respect to each nominee for director, his age, his principal occupation and the year in which he first became a director of the Company. Data with respect to the number of shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned by each of such persons as of February 5, 2016 appears under the caption “PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT” below. Name William L. Bridgford Allan L. Bridgford, Jr. Bruce H. Bridgford John V. Simmons Todd C. Andrews D. Gregory Scott Raymond F. Lancy Keith A. Ross Principal Occupation Age 61 Chairman of the Board and Member of the Executive Committee of the Company (1)(4) 56 Retired Executive of the Company (1)(4) 63 President of Bridgford Foods of California (1)(4) 60 President and Member of the Executive Committee of the Company (4) 50 Vice President and Controller of Public Storage (2)(3)(4) 59 Managing Director of Peak Holdings, LLC (2)(3)(4) 62 Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Treasurer and Member of the Executive Committee of the Company (4) 53 Real Estate Consultant Year First Became Director 2004 2011 2009 2011 2004 2006 2013 N/A (1) William L. Bridgford, Allan L. Bridgford, Jr. and Bruce H. Bridgford are cousins. (2) Member of the Compensation Committee. (3) Member of the Audit Committee. (4) Member of the Nominating Committee. Directors William L. Bridgford William L. Bridgford has served as Chairman of the Board since March of 2006. He previously served as President of the Company from June of 2004 until March of 2006, and Secretary of the Company for more than five years. Mr. Bridgford has been a full-time employee of the Company since 1981. He has also served as a member of the Executive Committee since 2004. Mr. Bridgford is a graduate of California State University, Fullerton with a degree in Business Management. Mr. Bridgford is one of the principal owners of Bridgford Industries Inc., the Company’s majority shareholder. He brings to the Board extensive experience in the operations of the Company and provides strong leadership skills that provide strategic business guidance to the Company. The Board believes his executive managerial experience and Company knowledge base combined with his understanding of corporate values and culture qualify him to serve as a member of the Board. B-1 Allan L. Bridgford, Jr. Allan L. Bridgford Jr. served as President of Bridgford Foods of Illinois, a division of the Company, from January 1983 until his retirement in October of 2002. Mr. Bridgford is a graduate of the University of Missouri with a degree in Economics. Mr. Bridgford is one of the principal owners of Bridgford Industries Inc., the Company’s majority shareholder. He brings to the Board extensive sales, marketing and distribution experience in the food industry. The Board believes these skills and experiences qualify him to serve as a member of the Board. Mr. Bridgford is providing consulting services to the Chicago plant and management. Bruce H. Bridgford Bruce H. Bridgford has served as President of Bridgford Foods of California, a division of the Company, since March of 1999. Mr. Bridgford has been a full time employee of the Company since 1977 and earned a B.S. degree in Business with a concentration in finance and marketing from the University of Southern California. Mr. Bridgford is one of the principal owners of Bridgford Industries Inc., the Company’s majority shareholder. He provides key insight into the direct store delivery operations of the Company as well as strategic direction for the sales management and marketing functions of the Company. The Board believes these skills and experiences qualify him to serve as a member of the Board. John V. Simmons John V. Simmons has served as President of the Company and member of the Executive Committee since 2006. He previously served as Vice President of the Company for more than five years. Mr. Simmons earned a B.A. degree in Psychology from the University of Wisconsin. Mr. Simmons has extensive knowledge and experience in the areas of marketing, product research and development, trade relations and operations developed as an employee of the Company since 1979. The Board believes these skills and experiences qualify him to serve as a member of the Board. Todd C. Andrews Todd C. Andrews is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and presently serves as Vice President and Controller of Public Storage, a member of the S&P 500, headquartered in Glendale, California. Mr. Andrews has been employed by Public Storage since 1997. Mr. Andrews graduated cum laude with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with an emphasis in accounting and finance from California State University, Northridge. Mr. Andrews has extensive experience in multiple accounting and finance roles over a period of more than 20 years. In particular, Mr. Andrews is experienced in the areas of financial reporting and analysis, treasury management, SEC reporting, internal controls and procedures and operational analysis. In addition, Mr. Andrews brings a diverse set of perspectives to the Board from serving in positions in multiple industries, including public accounting, entertainment, and real estate. The Board believes these skills and experiences qualify him to serve as a member of the Board. Mr. Andrews also qualifies as an audit committee financial expert and is financially sophisticated within the meaning of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. D. Gregory Scott D. Gregory Scott is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and currently serves as the Managing Director of Peak Holdings, LLC, an investment management company based in Beverly Hills, California. Mr. Scott has been with Peak Holdings, LLC for more than the past five years. Peak Holdings, LLC and its affiliates own and manage in excess of three million square feet of office, retail and warehouse space throughout the United States. Mr. Scott brings to the Board extensive financial and managerial experience, which qualifies him to serve as a member of the Board. Mr. Scott also qualifies as an audit committee financial expert and has financial sophistication as described in the NASDAQ Listing Rules. Raymond F. Lancy Raymond F. Lancy has served as Treasurer of the Company for more than the past five years. He has also served as a member of the Executive Committee since 2001, Vice President since 2001 and Chief Financial Officer since 2003. Mr. Lancy is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and worked for ten years as an auditor at PricewaterhouseCoopers. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree with a major in Administration with high honors from California State University, San Bernardino. Mr. Lancy has extensive knowledge and experience in the areas of finance and management developed at PricewaterhouseCoopers and as an employee of the Company since July of 1992 and as Chief Financial Officer since 2003. The Board believes these skills and experiences qualify him to serve as a member of the Board. Keith A. Ross Keith A. Ross is a real estate consultant. From August 2013 to present, Mr. Ross serves as Executive Vice President of CT Realty, or CTR, a real estate investment, development and management company based in Aliso Viejo, California. At CTR, Mr. Ross is in charge of all development and is responsible for sourcing, evaluating, and closing on all commercial development opportunities. In addition, Mr. Ross serves on CTR’s Executive Committee and Investment Committee. CTR was founded in 1994 and has successfully acquired in excess of $2.5 Billion in commercial real estate properties across Northern and Southern California. Prior to joining CTR, from 2001 to 2009, Mr. Ross was 2 Founder and Principal of Centra Realty Corporation and oversaw the company’s land acquisitions, capital raises of both equity and debt, architectural design, engineering, construction and sales/leasing efforts. Centra was consistently ranked as one of the most active real estate development companies in Orange County California. Mr. Ross began his professional career at the Koll Company and was with Koll for over a decade and served in various roles from project manager to marketing before leading the real estate development efforts of the company in Southern California. Keith attended San Diego State University. He currently serves on the Board of Directors and is a Co-Founder of Miocean, a nonprofit foundation that applies proven business approaches to curb the harmful effects of urban run-off pollution. Mr. Ross brings to the board extensive real estate acquisition development experience as well as project management and marketing expertise, which qualify him to serve as a member of the Board. Public Company Directorships Except as indicated above, none of the directors have been a director of any other public company in the past five years. Board Meetings During fiscal year 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors held eleven regularly scheduled monthly meetings and no special meetings. Each of the nominees holding office during this period attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of monthly meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings of committees upon which he served. Arrangements or Understandings with Directors There are no agreements or understandings pursuant to which any of the directors was elected to serve as a director. Controlled Company Status The Company is considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of Rule 5615(c)(1) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules based on the approximate 78.8% ownership of the Company by Bridgford Industries Incorporated and is therefore exempted from various rules pertaining to certain “independence” requirements of its directors and certain requirements with respect to the committees of the Board. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Andrews, Scott and Zippwald are all “independent directors” within the meaning of Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. In addition, if elected, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Ross would qualify as an independent director. Board Committees The Board of Directors maintains three committees, the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee and the Nominating Committee. Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee for fiscal year 2015 consisted of Messrs. Andrews, Scott and Zippwald. As of the date of mailing of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Andrews, Scott and Zippwald. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee is a non-employee director, and notwithstanding that the Company is a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NASDAQ Listing Rules, each member is independent as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and administering the Company’s compensation arrangements for all executive officers. The Compensation Committee meets no less frequently than annually (and more frequently as circumstances dictate) to discuss and determine executive officer and director compensation. The Compensation Committee does not generally retain the services of any compensation consultants. However, from time to time it utilizes compensation data from companies that the Compensation Committee deems to be competitive with the Company in connection with its annual review of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee has the power to form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate, provided that such subcommittees are composed entirely of directors who would qualify for membership on the Compensation Committee pursuant to applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Director Compensation.” The Compensation Committee held one meeting during fiscal year 2015. No additional compensation is paid to directors for participation on the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter, which was adopted on October 11, 2010 and was attached as Exhibit A to the Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The charter is not available on the Company’s website. Audit Committee The Audit Committee for fiscal year 2015 consisted of Messrs. Andrews, Scott and Zippwald. The Audit Committee has been established in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and each of the members of the Audit Committee is an “independent director” as defined in Rule 5605(c)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. In addition, the Board has determined that Messrs. Andrews and Scott qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as such term is used in the rules and regulations of the SEC. 3 The Audit Committee meets periodically with the Company’s independent registered public accountants and reviews the Company’s accounting policies and internal controls. It also reviews the scope and adequacy of the independent registered public accountants’ examination of the Company’s annual financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee selects the firm of independent registered public accountants to be retained by the Company, subject to shareholder approval, pre-approves services rendered by its independent registered public accountants and pre-approves all related-party transactions. The Audit Committee held seven meetings during fiscal year 2015. Each of the members of the Audit Committee receives $350 to $550 per meeting depending on the length of each meeting attended. In addition, the Audit Committee holds a pre-earnings release conference with the Company’s independent registered public accountants on a quarterly basis. The Audit Committee operates under an Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter, which was approved on November 8, 2010 and was attached as Exhibit B to the Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The charter is not available on the Company’s website. Nominating Committee The Board of Directors has decided that the full Board should perform the functions of a Nominating Committee for the Company. It made that decision because the Board believes that selecting new Board nominees is one of the most important responsibilities the Board members have to the Company’s shareholders, and for that reason, all of the members of the Board should have the right and responsibility to participate in the selection process. Because of its status as a “controlled company” within the meaning of Rule 5615(c)(1) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules, the Company is not required to have a Nominating Committee comprised solely of independent directors. The Nominating Committee does not act pursuant to a written charter. In its role as Nominating Committee, the full Board identifies and screens new candidates for Board membership. Nevertheless, actions of the Board, in its role as Nominating Committee, can be taken only with the affirmative vote of a majority of the independent directors on the Board, as defined by the NASDAQ Listing Rules. Upon the recommendation of corporate counsel Richard K. Bridgford, the Board, by unanimous vote of its independent directors, agreed to nominate Mr. Ross as a director nominee to fill the vacancy created on the Board from Paul Zippwald’s retirement. Director Nomination Process In identifying new Board candidates, the Board will seek recommendations from existing Board members and executive officers. In addition, the Board will consider any candidates that may have been recommended by any of the Company’s shareholders who have made those recommendations in accordance with the shareholder nomination procedures described below. The Board, in its capacity as Nominating Committee, does not evaluate nominees recommended by shareholders differently from its evaluation of other director nominees. The Board also has the authority to engage an executive search firm and other advisors as it deems appropriate to assist in identifying qualified candidates for the Board. In assessing and selecting Board candidates, the Board will consider such factors, among others, as: the candidate’s independence, experience, knowledge, skills and expertise, as demonstrated by past employment and board experience; the candidate’s reputation for integrity; and the candidate’s participation in local community and local, state, regional or national charitable organizations. When selecting a nominee from among candidates considered by the Board, it will conduct background inquiries of and interviews with the candidates the Board members believe are best qualified to serve as directors. The Board members will consider a number of factors in making their selection of a nominee from among those candidates, including, among others: whether the candidate has the ability, willingness and enthusiasm to devote the time and effort required of members of the Board; whether the candidate has any conflicts of interest or commitments that would interfere with the candidate’s ability to fulfill the responsibilities of directors of the Company, including membership on Board committees; whether the candidate’s skills and experience would add to the overall competencies of the Board; and whether the candidate has any special background or experience relevant to the Company’s business. Board Consideration of Diversity The Board believes that differences in experience, knowledge, skills and expertise enhance the performance of the Board. Accordingly, the Board, in its capacity as Nominating Committee, considers such diversity in selecting and evaluating proposed Board nominees. However, the Board has not implemented a formal policy with respect to the consideration of diversity for the composition of the Board. Board Leadership Structure and the Role of the Board in Risk Management Oversight Board Leadership Structure. The Board is comprised of a total of eight directors. One of those directors, William L. Bridgford, serves as the Chairman of the Board. In this capacity, he is principally charged with fulfilling the following duties: Presiding as the Chairman of the meetings of the Board of Directors; Serving as a conduit of information between the independent directors and members of management; Approving Board of Directors meeting agendas and schedules; Calling executive session meetings of the independent directors, as needed; Reviewing information sent to the Board of Directors; 4 Working with the Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary to ensure the Board has adequate resources to support its decision-making obligations; Meeting with shareholders as appropriate; and Such other responsibilities and duties as the Board of Directors shall designate. The Company has not appointed a Chief Executive Officer. Instead, the Company has historically utilized a five-member Executive Committee to serve in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that the Executive Committee structure is appropriate for the Company because it requires a full committee of officers, each of whom bring their own experiences and perspectives to bear on their decision making, to discuss and vote on important decisions affecting the Company. The Company has utilized an Executive Committee in lieu of appointing a Chief Executive Officer for more than twenty years. See "Executive Officers" for further discussion about the role and membership of the Executive Committee. The Chairman of the Board serves on the Executive Committee. Thus, the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are intertwined to some extent. However, the Chairman of the Board, the President, and the Chief Financial Officer represent only three of the five members of the Executive Committee and no other directors currently serve on the Executive Committee. Accordingly, five of eight members of the Board are not members of the Executive Committee. The Board believes that this structure properly maintains the independence of the Board as a whole, and of the Chairman of the Board, from the Executive Committee. The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight. The responsibility for the day-to-day management of risk lies with the Executive Committee. Risk management is not viewed by the Executive Committee as a separate function, but rather is viewed as part of the day-to-day process of running the Company. It is the Board’s responsibility to oversee the Executive Committee with respect to its risk management function and to ensure that the Company’s risk management system is well-functioning and consistent with the Company’s overall corporate strategy and financial goals. In fulfilling that oversight role, the Board focuses on the adequacy of the Company's overall risk management system. The Board believes that an effective risk management system will adequately identify the material risks to the Company’s business, monitor the effectiveness of the risk mitigating policies and procedures, and provide the Executive Committee with input with respect to the risk management process. Code of Ethics The Company adopted a code of ethics that is applicable to, among other individuals, its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, and posted the code of ethics on its website at http://www.bridgford.com (and designated therein as the Code of Conduct). Any amendment or waiver to the Company’s code of ethics that applies to its directors or executive officers will be posted on its website or in a report filed with the SEC on Form 8-K. Communications with the Board Shareholders may communicate with the Board or any of the directors by sending written communications addressed to the Board of Directors generally, or to any director(s), to Bridgford Foods Corporation, 1308 North Patt Street, Anaheim, California 92801, Attention: Corporate Secretary. All communications are compiled by the Corporate Secretary and forwarded to the Board or the individual director(s) accordingly. Director Attendance at Annual Meetings The Company does not currently have a specific policy regarding director attendance at annual shareholder meetings. However, directors are strongly encouraged to attend annual shareholder meetings. All directors (then serving as directors of the Company) attended the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Executive Officers Members of the Company’s Executive Committee, comprised of the five executive officers named below, act in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The following five executive officers are elected annually to serve on the Executive Committee at the pleasure of the Board of Directors: Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Vice President and Member of the Executive Committee (1) Vice President and Chairman of the Executive Committee (1) Chairman of the Board and Member of the Executive Committee (1) President and Member of the Executive Committee Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Treasurer and Member of the Executive Committee (1) William L. Bridgford is the son of Hugh Wm. Bridgford and the nephew of Allan L. Bridgford. Hugh Wm. Bridgford and Allan L. Bridgford are brothers. Allan L. Bridgford is the father of Allan L. Bridgford, Jr., who serves on the Company’s Board of Directors. A biographical summary regarding William L. Bridgford, Raymond F. Lancy and John V. Simmons is set forth above under the caption “Directors.” Biographical information with respect to the Company’s other executive officers is set forth below: 5 Allan L. Bridgford Allan L. Bridgford, age 80, previously served as Senior Chairman of the Board from March of 2006 to October of 2011. From March of 1995 through March of 2006, Mr. Bridgford served as Chairman of the Board. He has been an employee of the Company since 1957, and reduced his work schedule to 80% in March of 2000, 60% in March of 2005 and 50% in November 2014. Mr. Bridgford’s base compensation was reduced by the same percentage as his regular work schedule reduction. Mr. Bridgford has also served as a member of the Executive Committee since 1972. He is a graduate of Stanford University with a degree in Economics. Hugh Wm. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford, age 84, has served as Vice President of the Company and Chairman of the Executive Committee since March of 1995. He previously served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company for more than five years and was a full time employee of the Company from 1955 through December 2010. Mr. Bridgford reduced his work schedule to 80% in January 2011 and 60% in November 2012. He also served as a member of the Executive Committee since 1972. Mr. Bridgford is a graduate of Stanford University with a degree in Economics and completed the Executive Program at the University of California at Los Angeles Graduate School of Business. Agreements or Understandings with Officers There are no agreements or understandings pursuant to which any of the executive officers was selected to serve as an executive officer. PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock as of February 5, 2016 by each shareholder known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, by each director and nominee for director, by each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and by all executive officers and directors as a group. The information as to each person or entity has been furnished by such person or group. Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) Bridgford Industries Incorporated 1707 Good-Latimer Expressway Dallas, TX 75226 Hugh Wm. Bridgford Allan L. Bridgford Bruce H. Bridgford Baron R.H. Bridgford 170 North Green St. Chicago, IL 60607 William L. Bridgford Allan L. Bridgford, Jr. Raymond F. Lancy John V. Simmons 1707 Good-Latimer Expressway Dallas, TX 75226 Todd C. Andrews D. Gregory Scott Paul R. Zippwald Keith A. Ross All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons) Amount and Nature of Shares Beneficially Owned Sole Voting and Investment Power Shared Voting and Investment Power(2) Total Beneficially Owned(3) Percentage of Outstanding Shares Beneficially Owned(3) 7,156,396 48,917 155,882 3,448 1,654 6,175 20,000 — 363 200 8,550 1,452 — — 7,156,396 7,156,396 7,156,396 7,156,396 7,156,396 7,156,396 — — — — — — 7,156,396 7,205,313 7,312,278 7,159,844 7,158,050 7,162,571 7,176,396 — 363 200 8,550 1,452 — 78.8% 79.4% 80.5% 78.9% 78.8% 78.9% 79.0% * * * * * * 7,403,037 7,156,396 7,403,037 81.5% * Represents ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares. (1) Unless otherwise indicated, the address of such beneficial owner is the Company’s principal executive offices, which are located at 1308 North Patt Street, Anaheim, California 92801. (2) Represents shares beneficially owned by Bridgford Industries Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“BII”) as reported on Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on April 5, 2010. Other than ownership of these shares, BII does not presently have any significant business or assets. Allan L. Bridgford, Hugh Wm. Bridgford, William L. Bridgford, Bruce H. Bridgford, Baron R.H. Bridgford and Allan L. Bridgford Jr. presently own 16.49%, 10.47%, 7.68%, 10.56%, 9.83% and 4.28%, respectively, of the outstanding voting capital stock of BII. The remaining shares of BII capital stock are owned of record, or beneficially, by 32 additional members of the Bridgford 6 family. The officers of BII jointly vote all of the Company’s shares held by BII. With respect to Hugh Wm. Bridgford, such amount also includes 1,000 shares held by his wife. (3) Applicable percentage of ownership as of February 5, 2016 is based upon 9,078,507 shares of common stock outstanding. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares shown as beneficially owned. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to community property laws where applicable, to the knowledge of the Company the persons listed above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s directors, executive officers, and holders of more than 10% of the Company’s common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock of the Company. Officers, directors and 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on the review of copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended October 30, 2015, all of the Company’s officers, directors and 10% shareholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements. COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Compensation Discussion and Analysis Compensation Overview This section provides information regarding the compensation paid to the Company’s “named executive officers” or “NEOs,” all of whom are members of the Executive Committee. The Company has historically been and continues to be principally managed by the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee, as a unit, serves as the Company’s “Chief Executive Officer.” The Executive Committee currently consists of the following five members: • Hugh Wm. Bridgford, Vice President and Chairman of the Executive Committee • Allan L. Bridgford, Vice President • William L. Bridgford, Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) • • Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) John V. Simmons, President The Company’s executive compensation program is overseen by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”), which is comprised of certain non-employee members of the Board. The basic responsibility of the Committee is to review the performance of the officers and key employees toward achieving the Company’s strategic goals and to help ensure that the Company is able to attract and retain individuals who can lead the Company to achieve those goals. Each member of the Committee is an independent director as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. One of the Company’s primary strategic goals is to increase shareholder value while meeting its objectives for customer satisfaction, improved sales and financial performance, sound corporate governance, and competitive advantage. The Company’s current emphases on controlling costs and improving profit margins on a consistent basis are also important factors which affect the Company’s compensation decisions. The Committee’s goal is to work with management to balance the Company’s financial goals and circumstances with the need to attract, motivate and retain the fully qualified and capable individuals the Company needs to meet and surpass its customers’ and shareholders’ expectations in a highly-competitive industry. Compensation Philosophy and Objectives The core of the Company’s executive compensation philosophy is to pay for performance. To that end, incentive bonus targets are set each year to reward excellent executive performance based upon the achievement of profit objectives by business units and the Company’s overall profitability based on pretax income, thus stimulating all executives to assume broad responsibility for the Company’s overall financial welfare and financial performance. The Committee’s guiding principles are as follows: • Work with management to provide a compensation program that recognizes individual contributions as well as the Company’s overall business results; • Provide reasonable levels of total compensation which will enable the Company to attract and retain qualified and capable executive talent within its industry, while also considering the Company’s current goals of controlling costs and effecting consistent improvements in its overall financial condition; • Motivate executive officers to deliver optimum individual and business unit performance; • Develop and retain a leadership team that is capable of successfully operating and growing an increasingly competitive and complex business in a rapidly changing industry; • Ensure that executive compensation-related disclosures are made to the public on a timely basis. 7 Role of the Compensation Committee The compensation of all NEOs is recommended by the Executive Committee and, after review and analysis, approved by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met one time during fiscal year 2015. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are as follows: • Review and approve, on an annual basis, the total compensation and compensation structure for the Executive Committee, including base salary, benefits, bonuses and equity compensation (if any). The Board’s evaluation of the Executive Committee’s performance is considered in setting incentives. The Committee seeks to maintain an appropriate balance, in light of overall Company performance and profitability, between the compensation of the Executive Committee and the compensation of other officers and employees generally. The Committee may also make any interim adjustments in any such compensation or plan as the Committee may deem appropriate, or as may be requested by the Board or the Compensation Committee. • Provide oversight of senior management’s decisions concerning the compensation of management, including evaluation procedures for Company officers and other executives deemed eligible for bonuses or equity compensation. • Review and approve compensation packages for new management personnel and, as needed, termination packages for departing management personnel. • Review and, as deemed necessary or desirable, oversee the administration of the Company’s stock incentive and stock purchase plans, if any. • Assist the Board of Directors and management in developing and evaluating potential candidates for executive positions. • Advise the Board of Directors in its succession-planning initiatives for the Company’s executive officers and other management personnel. • Oversee preparation of a report on executive compensation as required for inclusion in the Company’s annual Proxy Statement. Role of Management in the Compensation Determination Process The Company’s senior management team, particularly the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Executive Committee, support the Committee in the executive compensation decision-making process. At the request of the Compensation Committee, one or more members of the Executive Committee may present a performance assessment and recommendations to the Committee regarding base salaries, bonus payments, incentive plan structure and other compensation-related matters for the Company’s executives (other than with respect to their own compensation). Role of Compensation Consultant The Compensation Committee has decided not to utilize the services of a paid compensation consultant after concluding that such a consultant would provide insufficient value compared to the cost. Total Compensation for Executive Officers The compensation packages offered to the Company’s executive officers are comprised of one or more of the following elements: • Base salary; • Discretionary cash bonuses; • Post retirement healthcare and pension benefits. The Company does not have any formal policies which dictate the amount to be paid with respect to each element, nor does it have any policies which dictate the relative proportion of the various elements. The Company also does not have any formal policies for allocating between cash and non-cash compensation or short-term and long-term compensation. Instead, the Company relies on the judgment of the Compensation Committee and input and feedback from the management team, including in particular members of the Executive Committee. The Committee has no plans to adopt any such formulas, ratios or other such targets that might artificially dilute the Company’s effectiveness in achieving its overall profit objectives. In fact, all of the Company’s compensation policy decisions are made in the context of its current financial position and are subordinated to the Company’s current goal of achieving overall profitability on an annual basis. Each of the compensation components is described in more detail below. Base Salary The Company provides executive officers and other employees with base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year. The purpose of base salary is to reward effective fulfillment of an executive’s assigned job responsibilities, and to reflect the position’s relative value to the Company and competitiveness of the executive job market. Base salaries for executive officers are determined based on the nature and responsibility of the position, salary norms for comparable positions at similar companies, the expertise and effectiveness of the individual executive, and the competitiveness of the market for the executive officer’s services. The Company has successfully held most base salaries at the low end of the competitive range in order to reduce its overall cost structure and to achieve systematic improvement in the financial performance of the business without incurring a large turnover in executive talent and leadership. Any “merit increases” for the Company’s executive officers are subject to the same budgetary constraints that apply to all other employees. Executive officer salaries are evaluated as part of the Company’s annual review process and may be adjusted where justified in the context of the Company’s current focus on profitability and controlling expenses. 8 For fiscal year 2015, the Compensation Committee maintained the base salary of $4,842.62 per week for each Executive Committee member, reduced on a pro-rata basis for any member working less than a full time schedule. For fiscal year 2015, there was no base salary increase compared to fiscal year 2014. Discretionary Cash Bonuses The Company’s policy is to make a significant portion of each NEO’s total compensation contingent upon the Company’s financial performance. The Compensation Committee believes that the payment of cash bonuses based on the Company’s financial success allows the Company to offer a competitive total compensation package despite relatively lower base salaries, while aligning a significant portion of executive compensation with the achievement of positive Company financial results. However, while the payment of these cash bonuses to the NEOs is generally correlated with the achievement of positive Company financial results, there are no specific performance targets communicated to the NEOs in advance, and the bonuses are ultimately paid at the discretion of the Compensation Committee after receiving input from the Chairman of the Board. For the fiscal year ended October 30, 2015, discretionary bonuses were awarded to the members of the Company’s Executive Committee as disclosed in detail in the Summary Compensation Table. Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Compensation The Compensation Committee has concluded that long-term stock-related compensation has very limited value as an employee incentive or retention tool because the Company’s equity-based incentive awards have historically provided little or no value to the recipient. In addition, beginning in 2005, U.S. accounting rules required the Company to expense any stock option awards according to a formula which could impose a costly charge on the Company’s income statements, thereby burdening or erasing its profit margins. Because of these factors, the Company has not granted stock options or restricted stock awards for many years. Instead, the Compensation Committee aims to align the interests of the NEOs with those of the Company's shareholders by creating a link between the payment of executive compensation and the achievement of Company financial goals as described above. The Company’s 1999 Stock Incentive Plan expired by its own terms on April 29, 2009 and no additional stock options or restricted stock may be granted thereunder. Pension and Retirement Benefits Retirement Plan for Administrative and Sales Employees of Bridgford Foods Corporation. The Company has a defined benefit plan (the “Primary Benefit Plan”) for certain of its employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Primary Benefit Plan, administered by a major life insurance company, presently provides that participants receive an annual benefit on retirement equal to 1.5% of their total compensation from the Company during their period of participation from 1958. Benefits are not reduced by Social Security payments or by payments from other sources and are payable in the form of a monthly lifetime annuity commencing at age 65 or the participant’s date of retirement, whichever is later. Effective May 12, 2006, future benefit accruals under the Primary Benefit Plan were frozen. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Retirement benefits otherwise available to certain key executives under the Primary Benefit Plan have been limited by the effects of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (“TEFRA”) and the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (“TRA”). To offset the loss of retirement benefits associated with TEFRA and TRA, the Company has adopted a non-qualified “makeup” benefit plan (the “Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan”). Benefits will be provided under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan in an amount equal to 60% of their final average earnings minus any pension benefits and primary insurance amounts available to them under Social Security. However, in all cases the benefits are capped at $120,000 per year for Allan L. Bridgford and Hugh Wm. Bridgford. Benefits provided under this plan for William L. Bridgford and Raymond F. Lancy are calculated at 50% of final average earnings, capped at $200,000 per year, without offsets for other pension or Social Security benefits. Bridgford Foods Retirement Savings 401(k) Plan. The Company implemented a 401(k) plan effective May 13, 2006. The Company makes a matching contribution to each employee’s account based on pretax contributions in an amount equal to 100% of the first 3% of compensation and 50% of the next 2% of compensation contributed to the Plan. No amounts are contributed by the Company unless the employee elects to make a pretax contribution to the Plan. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Effective January 1, 1991 the Company adopted a deferred compensation savings plan for certain key employees. Under this arrangement, selected employees contributed a portion of their annual compensation to the plan. The Company contributed an amount to each participant’s account by computing an investment return equal to Moody’s Average Seasoned Bond Rate plus 2%. The purpose of the plan was to provide tax planning and supplemental funds upon retirement or death for certain selected employees and to aid in retaining and attracting employees of exceptional ability. Separate accounts are maintained for each participant to properly reflect his or her total vested account balance. No contributions or salary deferrals have been made in the past ten years. Perquisites and Other Benefits The Company provides its executive officers with `various health and welfare programs and other employee benefits which are generally available on the same cost-sharing basis to all of its employees. However, in keeping with the Company’s policy of controlling costs in connection with its profitability objectives, it does not provide any significant perquisites or other special benefits to its executive officers including, but not limited to, payment of club memberships, fees associated with financial planning, executive dining rooms or special transportation rights. The Company does not own an airplane and does not provide aircraft for executives for business or personal purposes. The Company provides post-retirement healthcare for certain executives and their spouses (who are within fifteen years of age of the employee) who have reached normal retirement age. This coverage is secondary to Medicare. Coverage for spouses continues upon the death 9 of the employee. The maximum benefit under the plan is $100,000 per year per retiree. The plan is subject to annual renewal by the Board of Directors and may be discontinued at the Board’s discretion. The plan was renewed for one year at the Board of Directors meeting held in January 2016. The combined cost of this plan during fiscal year 2015 was $19,000 for all active and retired participants. The Company pays life and disability insurance premiums on policies under which the Company’s President is the named owner and beneficiary. Employment Agreements The Company currently does not have any employment, severance, change of control or similar agreements with any of its NEOs. Refer to the compensation discussion below for information on pension, deferred compensation, and benefit-related payments payable in the event of a qualifying event such as employment termination, disability, death, or sale/merger/acquisition. Tax and Accounting Implications The Compensation Committee is responsible for considering the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides that it may not deduct non-performance-based compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid to its executive officers. The Company believes that the compensation paid under the current management incentive programs is fully deductible for federal income tax purposes. In certain situations, the Committee may approve compensation that will not meet the requirements for deductibility in order to ensure competitive levels of compensation for its executives and to meet its obligations under the terms of various incentive programs. However, the issue of deductibility has not come before the Committee in recent years and is not expected to be a concern for the foreseeable future. Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation and Frequency of Advisory Vote Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the Company held its first advisory (non-binding) shareholder vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal), and its first shareholder vote on the frequency of such say-on-pay proposal, at its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. At such meeting, the shareholders of the Company approved the overall compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and elected to hold a say-on-pay vote every three years. The second “say-on-pay” proposal was approved at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Company’s next say-on-pay proposal and frequency of such say-on-pay proposal will be presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in the Proxy Statement. 10 Summary Compensation Table The table below provides summary information concerning cash and certain other compensation paid to or accrued for the Company’s NEOs during fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Each of the NEOs named below are also members of the Executive Committee, which acts in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer of the Company. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further discussion of compensation arrangements pursuant to which the amounts listed in the table below were paid or awarded and the criteria for such payment or award. Name and Principal Position Allan L. Bridgford Vice President; Member of the Executive Committee; Former Senior Chairman of the Board Year 2015 2014 2013 Base Salary($)(7)Bonus($)(1) 144,071 0 64,636 125,908 151,090 146,689 Stock Awards($)(2) — — — Option Awards($)(3) — — — Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation($)(4) — — — Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified All Deferred Other Compensation Compensation($)(6) Earnings($)(5) 8,000 0 8,000 0 6,000 0 Hugh Wm. Bridgford Vice President; Chairman of the Executive Committee 2015 2014 2013 151,090 151,090 146,689 172,885 0 64,636 William L. Bridgford Chairman of the Board; Member of the Executive Committee (Principal Executive Officer) John V. Simmons President; Member of the Executive Committee Raymond F. Lancy Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) 2015 2014 2013 251,816 251,816 244,482 288,142 0 107,726 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013 251,816 251,816 244,482 288,142 0 107,726 251,816 251,816 244,482 288,142 0 107,726 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 0 0 165,930 355,662 137,742 58,878 62,037 0 72,813 333,625 138,017 18,600 18,400 18,200 18,600 18,400 18,200 42,976 42,776 42,576 18,600 18,400 18,200 Total($) 277,979 159,090 219,325 342,575 169,490 229,525 724,488 625,878 508,150 641,812 356,629 394,784 631,371 603,841 508,425 (1) There were no discretionary cash bonuses earned by each of the NEOs in fiscal year 2014. (2) The Company did not grant any stock awards to any of the NEOs during fiscal years 2013, 2014 or 2015. (3) The Company did not grant any option awards to any of the NEOs during fiscal years 2013, 2014 or 2015. (4) The Company did not utilize any non-equity incentive plans in order to pay compensation to its NEOs in fiscal year 2015. While it is the Company’s policy to provide each of the NEOs with an opportunity to earn cash bonuses that are correlated with the Company’s financial performance, the payment of the bonuses are ultimately subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Total Compensation for Executive Officers – Discretionary Cash Bonuses.” (5) This column includes the aggregate positive change in actuarial present value of each NEO’s accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and supplemental pension plans. In accordance with SEC rules, to the extent the aggregate change in present value of all defined benefit and supplemental pension plans for a particular fiscal year would have been a negative amount, the amount has instead been reported as $0 and the aggregate compensation for the NEO in the “Total” column has not been adjusted to reflect the negative amount. In addition, to the extent that the change in present value of any particular defined benefit or supplemental pension plan for a particular year was a negative amount, the negative amount has not been used to offset the positive change in present value associated with the other applicable defined benefit or supplemental pension plans. The aggregate negative change in the present value of the non-qualified deferred compensation plan and pension and retirement benefits for certain NEOs in certain fiscal years was as follows: (i) fiscal year 2015 Allan L. Bridgford, ($67,676), Hugh Wm. Bridgford ($83,473), (ii) fiscal year 2014 Allan L. Bridgford, ($108,940), Hugh Wm. Bridgford ($101,195), (iii) fiscal year 2013 Allan L. Bridgford, ($212,235), Hugh Wm. Bridgford ($215,627), and John V. Simmons ($60,233). (6) Consists of matching contributions to the Bridgford Foods Retirement Savings 401(k) plan made by the Company on behalf of each of the NEOs, except Allan L. Bridgford, and, for 2013 and 2014, an $8,000 payment to offset the negative impacts arising from the cancellation of supplemental executive health benefits. In addition, the amount for Mr. Simmons includes premiums in the amount of $24,376 for life and disability insurance policies issued for the benefit of Mr. Simmons and his designees. (7) Years 2013, 2014 and 2015 were 52 weeks. 11 Narrative to Summary Compensation Table See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further discussion of compensation arrangements pursuant to which amounts listed under the Summary Compensation Table were paid or awarded and the criteria for such payment or award. Grants of Plan-Based Awards There were no stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units or equity or non-equity-based performance awards granted to the Company’s NEOs during fiscal years 2015, 2014 or 2013. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End There were no outstanding options or stock awards held by any NEO as of October 30, 2015. Option Exercises and Stock Vested There were no shares acquired upon the exercise of stock options or vesting of stock awards by any NEO during fiscal years 2015, 2014 or 2013. Pension Benefits The tables below provide information concerning retirement plan benefits for each NEO and payments due upon certain termination scenarios. Retirement Plan for Administrative and Sales Employees of Bridgford Foods Corporation Normal Retirement: Benefits commence upon reaching the “Normal Retirement Date”, which is the first day of the month on or after attainment of age 65. Pension benefit payments begin on the normal retirement date and continue until death. Early Retirement: A participant may choose to retire up to ten years before the normal retirement date. If a participant retires early, the accrued pension will be reduced by a percentage to reflect the longer period over which pension benefits will be received. If a participant is married for at least one year and dies before retirement, a pension benefit will be payable to the surviving spouse for his or her life, provided certain eligibility requirements have been met. Death Benefits: Payments to a surviving spouse will begin on the first day of the month following a participant’s death but not sooner than the earliest date a participant could have elected to retire. Disability Benefits: A disability benefit is the accrued pension credited to a participant as of the date of disability. The years of credited service, present value of accumulated plan benefits and payments made during the fiscal year were as follows: For the Fiscal Year ended October 30, 2015: Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Number of Years Credited Service 57 59 42 36 23 Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) $ $ $ $ $ 987,462 $ 880,398 $ 688,442 $ 554,031 $ 501,023 $ Payments During Fiscal Year 78,398 56,427 — — — (1) The assumed discount rate used was 4.15% to compute the present value of the accumulated benefit. The IRS 2014 Combined Static Mortality table was used and an expected return on assets of 8.00% was assumed. For the Fiscal Year ended October 31, 2014: Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Number of Years Credited Service 56 58 41 35 22 Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) Payments During Fiscal Year $ $ $ $ $ 937,783 $ 837,378 $ 615,896 $ 495,153 $ 448,889 $ 77,239 55,593 — — — (1) The assumed discount rate used was 4.05% to compute the present value of the accumulated benefit. The IRS 2013 Combined Static Mortality table was used and an expected return on assets of 8.00% was assumed. 12 For the Fiscal Year ended November 1, 2013: Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Number of Years Credited Service 55 57 40 34 21 Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) $ $ $ $ $ 935,909 $ 819,155 $ 541,251 $ 433,116 $ 396,281 $ Payments During Fiscal Year 76,350 54,953 — — — (1) The assumed discount rate used was 4.65% to compute the present value of the accumulated benefit. The RP-2000 Combined Mortality Table was used and an expected return on assets of 8.00% was assumed. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) Payment of Retirement Benefit: All retirement, disability and death benefits shall be paid in monthly installments beginning on the commencement date following the participant’s retirement, disability or death and shall continue for a period of fifteen years. Normal Retirement: Benefits commence upon reaching the “Normal Retirement Date”, which means the date on which the participant has both attained age 65 and completed at least ten years of participation. SERP benefit payments begin at the normal retirement date. Early Retirement: A participant may choose to retire up to ten years before the normal retirement date if the participant has completed at least five years of participation. If a participant retires early, the SERP benefit will be determined based on the vested percentage attained as the time of retirement. Death Benefits: If a participant dies prior to having commenced receipt of benefits and is eligible for benefits hereunder, the participant’s beneficiary shall be entitled to receive an annual death benefit equal to the Normal Retirement Benefit determined as if the participant attained Normal Retirement Age on the date of his death, or, if after the Participant’s Normal Retirement Date, equal to the Late Retirement Benefit. If a participant dies after having commenced receipt of benefits, benefits shall continue to be paid but to the Participant’s Beneficiary at the same time and in the same form as the benefits would have been payable to the participant. No benefit will be payable to a participant’s beneficiary if the participant terminates employment with the Company before he is eligible for a retirement benefit and thereafter dies. Disability Benefits: A disability benefit is the vested percentage of SERP benefit credited to a participant as of the date of disability. The present value of accumulated plan benefits and payments made during the fiscal year were as follows: For the Fiscal Year ended October 30, 2015: Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy (1) A 4.15% discount rate was used to compute the present values. For the Fiscal Year ended October 31, 2014: Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy (1) A 4.05% discount rate was used to compute the present values. 13 Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) Payments During Last Fiscal Year $ $ $ $ $ 33,948 $ 40,241 $ 2,153,073 $ --- $ 2,080,368 $ 51,528 61,080 --- --- --- Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) Payments During Last Fiscal Year $ $ $ $ $ 83,238 $ 98,668 $ 2,059,689 $ --- $ 2,059,689 $ 51,528 61,080 --- --- --- For the Fiscal Year ended November 1, 2013: Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) Payments During Last Fiscal Year $ $ $ $ $ 129,653 $ 153,687 $ 1,778,672 $ --- $ 1,778,672 $ 51,528 61,080 --- --- --- (1) A 4.65% discount rate was used to compute the present values. The following table estimates the present value of SERP benefits under different employment termination scenarios as of October 30, 2015: Present Value of Benefit Upon Voluntary Termination of Employment (1) Present Value of Benefit if Disabled (1) Present Value of Benefit Upon Death (1) Present Value of Benefit Upon Involuntary Termination of Employment due to Sale/Merger/ Acquisition (1) $ $ $ $ $ 33,948 $ 40,241 $ 2,153,073 $ — $ 2,080,368 $ 33,948 $ 40,241 $ 2,153,073 $ — $ 2,080,368 $ 33,948 $ 40,241 $ 2,153,073 $ — $ 2,080,368 $ 33,948 40,241 2,153,073 — 2,080,368 Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford (2) John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy (2) (1) In each scenario above, the benefit amount shown is calculated at October 30, 2015. A 4.15% discount rate was used to compute the present values. In the case of a voluntary termination, the participant shall be entitled to the vested portion of any such early retirement benefit but shall not commence receipt of such early retirement benefit until the commencement date following the date the participant would have attained the early retirement date had the participant remained employed by the Company. Upon a finding that the participant (or, after the participant’s death, a beneficiary) has suffered an unforeseeable emergency, the Committee may at the request of the participant or beneficiary, and subject to compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, accelerate distribution of benefits under the SERP in the amount reasonably necessary to alleviate such unforeseeable emergency. (2) Death benefits for William L. Bridgford and Raymond F. Lancy are paid in the form of a monthly annuity. The actual payment amount for William L. Bridgford and Raymond F. Lancy would be determined using a discount rate similar to the rate required for qualified plans. The rate assumed for these estimates is 4.15%. 14 The following table estimates future SERP payments under different termination scenarios as of October 30, 2015: Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford Payment Upon Voluntary Termination of Employment Payment if Disabled (1) Death Benefit from Plan (2) Continues to receive $4,294 for another 8 months Continues to receive $4,294 for another 8 months Continues to receive $4,294 for another 8 months Continues to receive $5,090 for another 8 months $15,950.86 per month for 180 months beginning on 10/30/15 Continues to receive $5,090 for another 8 months $15,950.86 per month for 180 months commencing after disability Continues to receive $5,090 for another 8 months $15,950.86 per month for 180 months beginning just after death Involuntary Termination of Employment Due to Sale/Merger/ Acquisition Continues to receive $4,294 for another 8 months Continues to receive $5,090 for another 8 months Lump Sum payment due at termination of $2,153,073 John V. Simmons — — — — Raymond F. Lancy $15,423.23 per month for 180 months beginning on 10/30/15 $15,423.23 per month for 180 months commencing after disability $15,423.23 per month for 180 months beginning just after death Lump Sum payment due at termination of $2,080,368 (1) Disability amount is decreased by any Company paid disability insurance policies, Social Security disability benefits, or other Federal or State disability programs. In the case of a voluntary termination, the participant shall be entitled to the vested portion of any such early retirement benefit but shall not commence receipt of such early retirement benefit until the commencement date following the date the participant would have attained the early retirement date had the participant remained employed by the Company. Upon a finding that the participant (or, after the participant’s death, a beneficiary) has suffered an unforeseeable emergency, the Committee may at the request of the participant or beneficiary, and subject to compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, accelerate distribution of benefits under the SERP in the amount reasonably necessary to alleviate such unforeseeable emergency. (2) Assumes death on October 30, 2015. The discount rate used to calculate the lump sum amount is 4.15%. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Total Compensation for Executive Officers -- Pension and Retirement Benefits” for further discussion of the pension benefits contained in the tables above. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation The table below provides information concerning deferred compensation plan benefits for each NEO during the fiscal year ended October 30, 2015. Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Executive Contributions in Company Contributions in Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Aggregate Earnings in Fiscal Year Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions Aggregate Balance at Fiscal Year End $ $ $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 73,809 $ 73,809 $ — $ — $ — $ 49,040 49,040 — — — The table below provides information concerning deferred compensation plan benefits for each NEO during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014. Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Executive Contributions in Company Contributions in Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Aggregate Earnings in Fiscal Year Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions Aggregate Balance at Fiscal Year End $ $ $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 15 — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 73,908 $ 73,908 $ — $ — $ — $ 117,105 117,105 — — — The table below provides information concerning deferred compensation plan benefits for each NEO during the fiscal year ended November 1, 2013. Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Executive Contributions in Company Contributions in Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Aggregate Earnings in Fiscal Year Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions Aggregate Balance at Fiscal Year End $ $ $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 73,530 $ 73,530 $ — $ — $ — $ 181,505 181,505 — — — The following table estimates the present value of non-qualified deferred compensation benefits under different employment termination scenarios as of October 30, 2015: Name Allan L. Bridgford Hugh Wm. Bridgford William L. Bridgford John V. Simmons Raymond F. Lancy Present Value of Benefit at Termination of Employment Present Value of Benefit if Disabled Present Value of Benefit Upon Involuntary Termination of Employment Due to Sale/Merger/ Acquisition Present Value of Benefit Upon Death $ $ $ $ $ 49,040 $ 49,040 $ — $ — $ — $ 49,040 $ 49,040 $ — $ — $ — $ 49,040 $ 49,040 $ — $ — $ — $ 49,040 49,040 — — — Effective January 1, 2016, Allan L. Bridgford and Hugh Wm. Bridgford each receive a monthly deferred compensation payment of $6,073 for seven (7) months and $6,530 for one (1) month, as compared to $6,147 prior to such date. As of October 30, 2015, eight (8) such monthly payments remained for these recipients. The deferred compensation amounts are calculated using a crediting rate equal to Moody’s Average Seasoned Bond Rate, plus 2%. This rate is subject to fluctuation. Upon death, the deferred compensation benefits are paid in a lump sum equal to the individual’s remaining account balance. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Total Compensation for Executive Officers – Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” for further discussion of the non-qualified deferred compensation benefits contained in the tables above. Director Compensation The table below summarizes the total compensation paid by the Company to directors who were not NEOs during fiscal year 2015. Directors who were NEOs did not receive any additional compensation for their services as directors. Fees Earned or Paid Cash Stock awards Option awards Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation All Other Compensation Total $ $ $ $ 19,500 $ 16,600 $ 16,800 $ 21,400 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 19,500 16,600 16,800 21,400 Name Todd C. Andrews Allan L. Bridgford, Jr. D. Gregory Scott Paul R. Zippwald The Company uses cash compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on its Board of Directors. In setting director compensation, the Company considers the demands that have been placed and will continue to be placed on the directors and the skill-level required by its directors. In addition, as with the Company’s executive officers, compensation decisions for directors are made in the context of the Company’s focus on controlling costs and increasing profitability. 16 The directors are not paid an annual retainer for their service on the Board. Instead, each non-employee director was paid $1,800 for each of the first seven Board meetings attended during fiscal year 2015 and $1,900 for each subsequent Board meeting attended in fiscal year 2015. Members of the Audit Committee were paid $350 to $550 for each Audit Committee meeting attended depending on the length of the meeting. The members of the Compensation Committee were not paid any additional compensation for their service. In addition, the directors were not paid any additional compensation for their service on the Nominating Committee. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The Company's general legal counsel is the son of Allan L. Bridgford. For his legal counsel, he currently is paid a fee of $1,800 to $1,900 for each Board of Directors meeting attended. Total fees paid under this arrangement were $20,200 in fiscal year 2015 and $19,600 in fiscal year 2014. In addition, legal services are performed on behalf of the Company and billed by a firm in which he is a partner. Total fees billed under this arrangement for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2014 were approximately $108,000 and $1,000, respectively. Director Allan L. Bridgford Jr., son of the former senior chairman of the board of directors, is providing consulting services to the Chicago plant and management. The arrangement on behalf of the Company with Allan L. Bridgford Jr. currently provides for consulting services at $1,200 per day. Total fees billed under this arrangement were approximately $136,000 in fiscal year 2015 and $173,000 in fiscal year 2014. Director nominee Keith Ross provides real-estate consulting services to the Chicago plant and management. He was paid a fee of $1,900 for each board meeting attended as a consultant during fiscal 2015 for a total of $3,800. Other than the relationships noted above, the Company is not aware of any related party transactions that would require disclosure as a related party transaction under SEC rules. The Company’s executive officers, directors, nominees for directors and principal shareholders, including their immediate family members and affiliates, are prohibited from entering into related party transactions with the Company that would be reportable under Item 404 of Regulation S-K without the prior approval of its Audit Committee (or other independent committee of the Board of Directors in cases where it is inappropriate for the Audit Committee to review such transaction due to a conflict of interest). Any request for the Company to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, or nominee for director, principal shareholder or any of such persons’ immediate family members or affiliates that would be reportable under Item 404 of Regulation S-K must first be presented to the Audit Committee for review, consideration and approval. In approving or rejecting the proposed agreement, the Audit Committee will consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant, including but not limited to, the risks, costs, and benefits to the Company, the terms of the transactions, the availability of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if applicable, the impact on director independence. The Audit Committee shall only approve those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are in or are not inconsistent with, the Company’s best interests, as determined in good faith by the Audit Committee (or other independent committee, as applicable). The requirement for the Audit Committee to review related-party transactions (defined as those transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K) is set forth in the Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter, which was approved on November 8, 2010 and was attached as Exhibit B to the Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 17 RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PROPOSAL 2 The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has, subject to ratification by the shareholders, appointed Squar Milner LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 28, 2016. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter is required to ratify the appointment of Squar, Milner, Peterson, Miranda and Williamson, LLP. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” the Proposal. Brokers have discretion to vote uninstructed shares with respect to this Proposal. Accordingly, broker non-votes will not occur with respect to this Proposal. Proxies received in response to this solicitation will be voted “FOR” the approval of Squar Milner LLP unless otherwise specified in the proxy. In the event of a negative vote on such ratification, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors will reconsider its selection. Representatives of Squar Milner LLP will be present at the meeting and available to respond to questions. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF SQUAR MILNER LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 28, 2016. Audit Fees PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Fees charged by Squar Milner LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for fiscal year 2015 were approximately $143,000. Fees charged by Squar Milner LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for fiscal year 2014 were approximately $137,000. Audit-Related Fees Audit-related fees typically consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services may include consultations related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. There were no audit-related fees billed by Squar Milner LLP for fiscal year 2015 or fiscal year 2014. Tax Fees Tax fees are comprised of services that include assistance related to state tax compliance services and consultations regarding federal and state research and development tax credits. There were no tax fees billed by Squar Milner LLP for fiscal year 2015 or fiscal year 2014. All Other Fees All other fees are comprised of fees for initial planning for certification of internal controls over financial reporting. No such fees were billed by Squar Milner LLP for fiscal year 2015 or fiscal year 2014. POLICY ON AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT SERVICES AND PERMISSIBLE NON-AUDIT SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accountants. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. During fiscal years 2015 and 2014, the Audit Committee approved all such services rendered by its independent registered public accountants. For audit services, the independent registered public accountants provide the Audit Committee with an audit plan including proposed fees in advance of the annual audit. The Audit Committee approves the plan and fees for the audit. For non-audit services, the Company’s senior management will submit from time to time to the Audit Committee for approval non-audit services that it recommends the Audit Committee engage the independent registered public accountants to provide during the fiscal year. The Company’s senior management and the independent registered public accountants will each confirm to the Audit Committee that each non- audit service is permissible under all applicable legal requirements. A budget, estimating non-audit service spending for the fiscal year, will be provided to the Audit Committee along with the request. The Audit Committee must approve both permissible non-audit services and the budget for such services. 18 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE Pursuant to a meeting of the Audit Committee on January 11, 2016, the Audit Committee reports that it has: (i) reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management; (ii) discussed with the independent registered public accountants the matters (such as the quality of the Company’s accounting principles and internal controls) required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees” (formerly known as Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16, which superseded Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012) of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; and (iii) received the written disclosures and the letter from Squar Milner LLP regarding its communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with them their independence. Based on the review and discussions referred to in items (i) through (iii) above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report for the Company’s fiscal year ended October 30, 2015. AUDIT COMMITTEE D. Gregory Scott, Chairman Todd C. Andrews Paul R. Zippwald The foregoing Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed soliciting material, shall not be deemed filed with the SEC and shall not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. 19 (This page intentionally left blank.) S R O T C E R D I Todd C. Andrews Vice President and Controller, Public Storage, Inc. Allan L. Bridgford, Jr. Consultant (Formerly President of Bridgford Foods of Illinois) Bruce H. Bridgford Vice President William L. Bridgford Chairman Raymond F. Lancy Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and member of the Executive Committee D. Gregory Scott Managing Director, Peak Holdings, LLC John Simmons President Paul R. Zippwald Retired (formerly Regional Vice President, Bank of America) S R E C I F F O Allan L. Bridgford Vice President and member of the Executive Committee Bruce H. Bridgford Vice President Hugh Wm. Bridgford Chairman of the Executive Committee and Vice President Michael Bridgford Assistant Secretary William L. Bridgford Chairman and member of the Executive Committee Chris Cole Vice President Joe deAlcuaz Vice President Manufacturing Bob Delong Vice President, Information Technologies Raymond F. Lancy Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and member of the Executive Committee Cindy Matthews–Morales Corporate Secretary and Controller John V. Simmons President and member of the Executive Committee Daniel R. Yost Senior Vice President S R E G A N A M N O S I I I V D Baron R. H. Bridgford President, Bridgford Processing Company of Illinois Bridgford Foods of Illinois Blaine K. Bridgford President Dallas- Superior Foods Division Bruce H. Bridgford Chairman & President, Bridgford Foods of California Joseph deAlcuaz Vice President Dallas- Frozen-Rite Division Monty Griffith Vice President Bridgford Foods of North Carolina Jeffrey D. Robinson Bakery Manager Anaheim- Bread Division Bridgford Pro Angling Team 297645_048-1277(cid:0)Annual(cid:0)Report(cid:0)01_R1_Layout(cid:0)1(cid:0) (cid:0)2/11/16(cid:0) (cid:0)3:04(cid:0)PM(cid:0) (cid:0)Page(cid:0)3 R E D L O H E R A H S R U O O T S Bridgford Foods is pleased to report greatly improved financial results during our 2015 Discontinuing our Western Deli processing and distribution operations at the close of the fiscal year. The challenges we faced during 2014 led us to re-evaluate our operations and 2014 fiscal year left us with an underutilized plant in Anaheim, and we decided to offer make some difficult but important changes, and those adjustments were rewarded with the storage space to other businesses to generate additional income. It took most of the 2015 4th best year in the Company’s 83-year history. As the year progressed, we benefited from year to find suitable, compatible tenants, but we are now approaching capacity and bringing declining costs in many aspects of our business, and those lower costs plus the elimination in steady revenues to complement our continuing bakery operations. of operations that had been a drain on our finances in prior years produced great results. Sales during our 2015 fiscal year were $130,448,000, a decrease of 2.2% from sales of $133,401,000 in 2014. Sales on continuing operations in 2015 were $130,448,000, an increase of 3.7% from sales of $125,747,000 on those same operations in 2014. The Company recorded a net profit before taxes of $8,118,000 on operations in 2015, equal to $0.89 per share. These positive results, combined with a favorable outlook for our future performance, resulted in a reversal of the tax valuation allowance imposed in 2008 in the amount of $10,848,000, combined with a tax provision of -$3,524,000, resulting in total net income for the year of $15,442,000. SALES AND MARKETING HIGHLIGHTS In our foodservice bread division, led by Senior Vice President Dan Yost, school feeding continues to be an important part of our marketing efforts. Our “Better For You” line of products enables schools to serve healthier, better tasting bread products to their students, as we strive to help Food Service Directors across the country meet the guidelines mandated by the United States Department of Agriculture while providing meals that kids will actually eat! We introduced both Maple- and Blueberry-Flavored White Whole Wheat Biscuits during the year, and have high hopes for their future success. A major fast food chain is testing our 4-ounce Single Serve Monkey Bites in their breakfast program, and the initial response has been very positive. In the retail arena, Walmart has been testing a twin-pack of our Monkey Bites in over 700 of their stores, and the success it has enjoyed has us optimistic that the distribution will be expanded in the future. Super Target recently authorized Bridgford Ready-Dough, Bridgford Parkerhouse Rolls, and Bridgford Monkey Bread for sale in their western division beginning in the Spring of 2016. We have also been supplying the biscuit component of entrees produced by Fra’Mani Handcrafted Foods for sale in Costco. In today’s constantly changing technology-driven world, staying up-to-date is a never-ending challenge, and we’d like to recognize Vice President for Information Technology Bob Delong for his dedication (and patience!) in keeping us up to speed both collectively and individually. FINANCIAL MATTERS Our working capital totaled $26,546,000 at October 30, 2015, $8,686,000 (48.6%) higher than at the beginning of the fiscal year, and our working capital ratio increased to 2.9 to 1 at October 30, 2015, compared to 2.2 to 1 at October 31, 2014. The increase in working capital resulted from lower payments for meat commodities, increased profitability and reestablishing our deferred tax assets. We repurchased 33,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in the amount of $283,000 ($8.58 average price paid per share) during 2015. Projected contributions totaling $1,150,000 were recorded as a current liability related to our defined benefit pension plan at October 30, 2015, and we contributed a total of $1,157,000 toward this plan during the 2015 fiscal year. The defined benefit plan was frozen in the 3rd quarter of 2006 and replaced with a 401(k) defined contribution plan. The Company paid $798,000 related to the Company’s withdrawal from the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan during fiscal 2015. We maintain a line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank in the amount of $4,000,000 which expires March 1, 2016. The Company did not borrow under this line of credit during fiscal 2015 and had no borrowings outstanding as of October 30, 2015. Shareholders’ equity totaled $35,645,000, an increase of $10,395,000 (41.2%) compared to the end of the prior year. The reversal of the tax valuation allowance, as mentioned above, coupled with net income from operations of $8,118,000, were the most significant components of this change. Our frozen defined benefit pension recognized a loss of $4,665,000 in Shareholders’ equity. This loss resulted from a change in the mortality tables used by our actuaries and lower than expected investment returns on our pension assets Our retail Shelf-Stable Sandwich Twin-Packs achieved greatly increased distribution during partially offset by an increase in the Citigroup Pension Liability Index from 4.05% in fiscal the year. Some or all varieties are currently offered in all Cabela’s and Dick’s Sporting Goods year 2014 to 4.15% in fiscal year 2015. This rate is used to compute the present value of outlets, and in over 2,200 Walmarts. Our shelf-stable sandwich business with European our defined benefit pension obligations. Approximately 125,000 shares of the Company’s Union customers also improved in 2015, and while business with the U.S. military remained common stock remain available for repurchase under the 2 million share repurchase plan weak, we continue to work on the development of new items with military researchers at previously authorized by the Board of Directors. Shareholders’ equity per share was $3.92 Natick Laboratories. at October 30, 2015 compared to $2.77 at October 31, 2014. Our Chicago Dry Sausage and Meat Snack Division continued to make solid inroads in the Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial grocery segment of our business. Our Direct Store Delivery (DSD) route system is an reporting for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2015. We believe our control systems remain important factor in that growth, due to the service and value it allows us to provide to our effective. Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting is included customers. New products introduced during the year included Summer Sausage & Crackers, in the Form 10-K report. No significant weaknesses in internal accounting control, to the Bridgford Sweet Baby Ray’s Honey Barbecue Beef Jerky, and Bridgford Bacon Jerky. The extent identified, were unresolved at the conclusion of the 2015 fiscal year. management of our marketing efforts is in very stable hands, with Corporate Vice President Chris Cole and Division Vice President Baron Bridgford II leading the team. The Company’s presence in the world of professional bass fishing increased significantly during the year. We are now represented by five premier anglers: Randy Blaukat, Matt Stefan, Luke Clausen, Joe Uribe Jr., and Chad Randles, all of whom compete primarily in FLW (Fishing League Worldwide) events. In addition to their success on the water, these gentlemen are all first- class guys and great representatives for our brand and our products, and we are proud to have them on the Bridgford Foods team. OPERATIONS Though the 2015 fiscal year began with very high commodity costs, prices for meat, flour and fuel declined for the most part as the year progressed. Under the direction of Baron R.H. Bridgford, President of Bridgford Foods of Illinois, our Dry Sausage and Meat Snacks Division made great improvements to the processes we employ to produce our beef jerky, and we truly believe that we are currently making the most tender, consistent and flavorful jerky in the world. Our Pepperoni, Summer Sausage and other dry sausage products also proudly carry our designation as “The Premium Brand”, and command a higher price in the marketplace than our competition. Our team of managers in the frozen food division, Monty Griffith in Statesville, Jeff Robinson in Anaheim, Blaine Bridgford at Superior Foods in Dallas, and Joe deAlcuaz at Frozen-Rite, are simply the best. As a result of the success of our various Monkey Bread products, we are evaluating options to increase our production capacity in this area. We are eliminating some low-margin items at our Superior plant to provide more production hours, but we are also studying ways to add Monkey Bread production at our other locations. Director Bruce Bridgford has done a stellar job of leading our efforts to reduce our freight expenses, and the savings we have achieved in this area since he took on that role two years ago are significant. Our accounting and financial reporting team, led by Corporate Secretary and Controller Cindy Matthews-Morales, did a fantastic job working with a downsized and reorganized staff to continue to provide timely and accurate information to help us run our business profitably. SUMMARY As we begin 2016, we expect many of the trends that benefited us in 2015 to continue. While the price of pork dropped dramatically during the past year from the record highs achieved in 2014, beef prices only recently began to soften, and that gradual trend is expected to continue for the next couple of years. Flour and fuel costs also show no indication of a dramatic strengthening in the near term. The cessation of two unprofitable operations in 2014 did provide the relief we expected. Our workforce got very lean as 2014 played out, and we intend to keep it that way. As we stated in last year’s letter, tough times bring out the best in tough organizations; in many ways we have grown and benefited as a result of that disappointing year, and we’re determined to keep moving forward without repeating the mistakes of the past. Our mission remains the same: to be resilient, to be the best, to be profitable, and to enjoy doing it. We appreciate the efforts of our employees, the loyalty of our customers, and the support of our suppliers, partners and other associates as we battled our way back during the 2015 year, and we are excited about our prospects for 2016. Over our history, we’ve been fortunate to enjoy the contributions of many long-tenured associates, and one such person is Lorene Salcido, who was a key part of our team for over 41 years and a major contributor to these annual reports for most of those years. Please join us in congratulating Lorene on her recent retirement, and wishing her well in the years to come! Similarly, Paul Zippwald will be stepping down from our Board of Directors in March of 2016, and we’d like to thank him for almost a quarter-century of friendship, sage advice and rock-solid support. Respectfully, January 16, 2015 William L. Bridgford Chairman John V. Simmons President Raymond F. Lancy Chief Financial Officer 297645_048-1277(cid:0)Annual(cid:0)Report(cid:0)01_R1_Layout(cid:0)1(cid:0) (cid:0)2/11/16(cid:0) (cid:0)3:04(cid:0)PM(cid:0) (cid:0)Page(cid:0)1 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 I 5 Notice of 20I6 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement Bridgford Foods Corporation 1308 North Patt Street P.O. Box 3773 Anaheim, California 92803 Phone (714) 526-5533 www.bridgford.com Major Operating Facilities Chicago, Illinois Dallas, Texas Statesville, North Carolina Transfer Agent and Registrar Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company 17 Battery Place, 8th Floor New York, NY 10004 1-800-509-5586 Independent Accountants Squar Milner LLP Newport Beach, California ©2016 Bridgford Foods Corp. YW 048-1277 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above